Mir-2002 commited on
Commit
2666d26
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f172ea6

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +24 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -158,4 +158,27 @@ On the 35th epoch, the model achieved the following loss:
158
  | 35.40 | 58.55 | 39.46 | 52.43 |
159
 
160
  While a SacreBLEU score of 35 is a moderate score, it is important to consider that docstrings in Google style format vary extremely. Some are outliers that have extra sections
161
- that is usually not included in the general population which leads the model to generate "hallucinations".
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
158
  | 35.40 | 58.55 | 39.46 | 52.43 |
159
 
160
  While a SacreBLEU score of 35 is a moderate score, it is important to consider that docstrings in Google style format vary extremely. Some are outliers that have extra sections
161
+ that is usually not included in the general population which leads the model to generate "hallucinations". An example of this is this particular sample:
162
+
163
+ ```
164
+ Reference: Validate timestamp specified by request.
165
+
166
+ See `validate.request` for additional info.
167
+
168
+ Args:
169
+ stamp: str. Time request was made as ISO 8601 timestamp.
170
+ tolerance: int. Number of seconds request remains valid from timestamp.
171
+
172
+ Returns
173
+ bool: True if valid, False otherwise.
174
+ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
175
+ Prediction: Validate timestamp.
176
+
177
+ Args:
178
+ stamp (str): A date string in the format YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.######[+-]##:##
179
+
180
+ Returns:
181
+ bool: True if valid, False otherwise.
182
+ ```
183
+
184
+ As you can see, the model generated gibberish in the prediction's Args section specifically the string format for the date.