Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ In the comparisons presented above, Motif 2.6B showed average performance improv
|
|
172 |
|
173 |
However, when compared against the benchmarks and scores reported in the Qwen 2.5 technical report, Motif 2.6B demonstrated a +18.55% average improvement over Llama 3 8B and a +2.63% improvement over Gemma 2 9B. See the table below for details.
|
174 |
|
175 |
-
### Comparison to Llama 3 8B and Gemma 2 9B based on scores from the
|
|
|
176 |
|
177 |
|Benchmark|Metric|Llama 3 8B|Gemma 2 9B|Motif 2.6B|Improvement(over Llama 3 8B)|Improvement(over Gemma 2 9B)|
|
178 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
172 |
|
173 |
However, when compared against the benchmarks and scores reported in the Qwen 2.5 technical report, Motif 2.6B demonstrated a +18.55% average improvement over Llama 3 8B and a +2.63% improvement over Gemma 2 9B. See the table below for details.
|
174 |
|
175 |
+
### Comparison to Llama 3 8B and Gemma 2 9B based on scores from the *Qwen2.5 technical report*
|
176 |
+
The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the [Qwen2.5 technical report](https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15115).
|
177 |
|
178 |
|Benchmark|Metric|Llama 3 8B|Gemma 2 9B|Motif 2.6B|Improvement(over Llama 3 8B)|Improvement(over Gemma 2 9B)|
|
179 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|