--- license: cc-by-4.0 task_categories: - image-text-to-text - image-feature-extraction language: - en tags: - pdf - ocr - legal - government size_categories: - 100K=3.1 required for AES | 15 | 16.1% | | Stream ended unexpectedly | 9 | 9.7% | | 'NullObject' has no attribute 'get' | 5 | 5.4% | | Other errors | 18 | 19.4% | ### Temporal Coverage | Date Field | Range | Issues | |------------|-------|--------| | **Modified Date** | 1979-12-31 to 2025-03-31 | (dates in 2023-2025 are incorrect/defaulted to) | | **Created Date** | Various formats | 1,573 invalid "D:00000101000000Z" | ### Critical Assessment > [!NOTE] > Generated by Claude Sonnet-4, unsolicited (_as always_) #### Data Quality Issues | Issue | Severity | Impact | |-------|----------|---------| | **Metadata Poverty** | **CRITICAL** | 79% missing subjects kills discoverability | | **Title Degradation** | **HIGH** | 28% generic/missing titles | | **Date Inconsistencies** | **MEDIUM** | Invalid formats, future dates | | **Processing Errors** | **LOW** | 0.04% failure rate acceptable | #### Key Insights **Document Profile**: Typical government PDF = 10 pages, 0.15 MB, metadata-poor **Fatal Flaw**: This dataset has excellent technical extraction (99.96% success) but catastrophic intellectual organization. You're essentially working with 230K unlabeled documents. **Bottom Line**: The structural data is solid, but without subject classification for 79% of documents, this is an unindexed digital landfill masquerading as an archive. ---