{"id": "3b22b8a5870970d0640632f49a32ae786915f0be", "text": "FILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: LOCANOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH\n261-355412\nVOL. II\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY: THIRD AGENCY DOCUMENTS\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 16 July       |               | Jim Kelly                | James P. Kelly                 |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nContact Reports, etc., forwarded from the field.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LIROCKET-1 \u2014 P-12,244\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 27 June 1967\n\n1. I met Subject from 1300-1430 on 27 June at the Capistrano Restaurant. I paid him $2,000 M.N. as his salary for May and June. The next meeting is set for 25 July at 1300 at the Capistrano.\n\n2. Subject conducted 14 classes at the Soviet Embassy during the reporting period.\n\n6 June\n\n1530-1700 \u2014 BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, ROVANCHENKO. Subject asked if KAZANTSEV had gone out of town, as he had told Subject he would probably do. BEDRIN replied without hesitation that KAZANTSEV had gone to Moscow and wouldn't be back until about 15 June.\n\n6 June\n\n1530-1700 \u2014 BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, ROVANCHENKO. Toward the end of class, BEDRIN said there were two men who wanted to speak with Subject after class. Following class, two men Subject didn't recognize came in and GONCHARENKO and ROVANCHENKO left. The two men were introduced as Vladimir SOKOLOV and Pavel KOVALEV. BEDRIN explained briefly that they also were interested in taking English lessons, and thereupon left with the comment that he didn't believe he was needed. SOKOLOV was the first of the two to speak, repeated that he and KOVALEV wished to take lessons, and then turned things over to KOVALEV, who, he said, spoke better English than he. KOVALEV proceeded to state that he had served in Washington, D.C. for three years, had served an earlier tour in Mexico, and had been back in Mexico for about a month. (KAZANTSEV later said he and KOVALEV had served in...\nWashington at the same time.) At one point KOVALEV referred to SOKOLOV as his \"chief.\" SOKOLOV interjected that he was leaving Mexico \"sometime this year\" and wanted to brush up on his English in preparation for the 6th year English proficiency test he would have to take when he returned to the USSR. Subject said that on the whole, he got the impression that KOVALEV was replacing SOKOLOV. A schedule of two classes a week, from 1800-1930 on Tuesdays and Thursdays, was agreed upon. One of the two Soviets mentioned that the funds for their lessons would come out of the military department.\n\n1715-1830 \u2014 SOKOLOV and KOVALEV asked when Subject would suggest they have their first lesson, and Subject replied that since KAZANTSEV was away, they might as well begin immediately. The Soviets readily agreed. Subject described KOVALEV's English as good. His grammar is a little better than KAZANTSEV's, but he is not quite as fluent as KAZANTSEV. SOKOLOV's English is fairly fair, but he is decidedly behind KOVALEV and KAZANTSEV in both grammar and fluency. Nevertheless, Subject feels SOKOLOV is good enough to be in the same class as KOVALEV.\n\n8 June\n\n1530-1700 \u2014 BEDIN, GONCHARENKO, ROYANSHKO.\n1700-1830 \u2014 KOVALEV and SOKOLOV.\n\n11 June\n\n1530-1700 \u2014 BEDIN, GONCHARENKO, ROYANSHKO.\n1700-1830 \u2014 KOVALEV and SOKOLOV.\n\n15 June\n\n1520-1700 \u2014 Subject arrived at the Embassy early. BEDIN came into the Reception Room about 1520 and took Subject to the classroom (in which there has always been a TV set). Three of the guards were sitting around the TV watching the Salazar fight when Subject and BEDIN entered. GONCHARENKO\ncame in about 1530 and ROMANENKO about 1540. All watched the flight until it ended about 1550, after which the class began.\n\n1700-1830 -- KOVALEV and SOKOLOV.\n\n20 June\n\n1530-1700 -- BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, ROMANENKO.\n\n1700-1800 -- KAZANTSEV. KAZANTSEV began talking about his trip on his own initiative. He said he left Mexico City on 30 May and arrived in Moscow on 3 June. (He did not say when he returned to Mexico.) He gave no reason for the trip, but said he had \"several conferences and meetings\" in Moscow. Subject interjected that he thought the trip might have had something to do with the Middle East crisis, since it broke out just about the time KAZANTSEV left. KAZANTSEV laughed spontaneously at this idea and replied that what he knew about the Middle East wouldn't do anyone any good. He then went on to say he had spent his first weekend in Moscow with his son, who shortly thereafter left for his summer job in \"Siberia.\" He said he spent the second weekend (10-11 June) with his daughter. The daughter, according to KAZANTSEV, had planned to go \"south\" for a 2-3 week vacation in early June, but postponed the vacation when she learned her father was coming. (The implication, according to Subject, was that KAZANTSEV's trip came about fairly suddenly.) What KAZANTSEV was most interested in talking about, however, was the fact he had unexpectedly had to take his English proficiency test in Moscow. He consequently set aside the last three days of his stay for the test, which can often take that long. The first day is taken up by an oral test, and if one passes that, he goes on to the written test, which can take up to two days. KAZANTSEV, however, did so well on the oral test that he was exempted from the written test. He said his examiners gave him a \"4\" (on a 1-5 scale) and would have given him a \"5\" except for the fact he hadn't read any books in English since his last test. One is supposed to read four or five books a year in English, according\nto KAZANTSEV. In any event, KAZANTSEV was very happy with the outcome and with Subject's work in preparing him for the test. In fact, he said that although he had originally started taking lessons from Subject only to prepare for the test, he was so satisfied with his progress that he intended to stay on with Subject despite the fact the test was behind him.\n\n1800-1930 \u2014 KOVALEV and SOKOLOV.\n\n22 June\n\n1530-1700 \u2014 KAZANTSEV took the first hour and a half. He merely said BEDIN, GONCHARIKO, and ROMANENKO would not attend class that day.\n\n1700-1830 \u2014 KOVALEV and SOKOLIN.\n\n3. KOVALEV and SOKOLOV. SOKOLOV is the more simpatico of the two. While KOVALEV can be very pleasant, he seems to have an antagonistic strain and occasionally challenges Subject's teaching with: \"That isn't the way we do it in our courses,\" etc. Sometimes, in fact, the disputes on methods, points of grammar, etc. have become rather heated. On these occasions, SOKOLOV has usually stepped in more or less on Subject's side and cooled things off. At their second meeting, KOVALEV asked Subject directly what his views were on the Middle East crisis. Subject turned the question back on KOVALEV by saying he would frankly be more interested in KOVALEV's ideas, as he was sure KOVALEV was much better informed about the situation than he. KOVALEV backed away this time, claiming he didn't have much information either, but at a later class both he and SOKOLOV parroted the Soviet line about the crisis\u2014Israel was the aggressor, etc. On another occasion when the Middle East was again the topic, Subject referred to (what he recalled as) President Truman's post-World War II proposal to internationalize both the Suez and Panama canals. KOVALEV immediately objected to this idea, although he gave no indication of ever having thought about it before.\n4. KOVALEV. Subject said he mentioned KOVALEV and SONCLOV to his wife, and she immediately recalled KOVALEV as one of her students at the Mexican-North American Institute back in the late 50's or early 60's. She told Subject that he had been friendly with a number of people at the Institute (students and teachers). One of these, she recalled, was Bill CASTELAZO, a U.S. citizen who then and still teaches English and Spanish at the Instituto. CASTELAZO is about 35. He was among 20-25 persons who 7 or 8 years ago studied Russian at the Institute when it was taught for a brief time by a Russian woman. Subject's wife told Subject that KOVALEV and CASTELAZO had been very friendly and that KOVALEV had invited him to the Soviet Embassy at least twice. CASTELAZO told Subject's wife that after one of his visits to the Soviet Embassy, he was approached by someone from the American Embassy and asked to inform on the Soviets. CASTELAZO said he was repelled by the idea of being an informer and implied that he hadn't cooperated with the American. Subject said he had not known about CASTELAZO's acquaintance with KOVALEV, but had known that CASTELAZO had studied Russian and had had him to his apartment along with NOVANCHENKO, BERNIN, and DONCHARENO for his 1 July 1966 Batten-Dominion Day party.\n\n5. Subject subsequently mentioned to KOVALEV that his wife remembered having him as a student during his previous tour. Subject also remarked that his wife had mentioned that KOVALEV and his (Subject's) friend CASTELAZO had been friends. KOVALEV replied without any embarrassment that he didn't remember Subject's wife, but did remember CASTELAZO. KOVALEV asked Subject to give CASTELAZO his regards the next time he saw him.\n\n6. Other than a 1960 reference to \"Guillermo CASTELAZO\" as a 20-33 year old teacher at the Mexican-North American Institute and an author of one of the Institute's text books, there are no Station traces on\nthe C.I.A. in question. (See 50-6-55/3, C3 of 13 Sept. 1950.)\n\n7. LOGINOV. When Subject was leaving the Embassy on 15 June (about 1835), he met LOGINOV in front of the Reception Room. They talked, chiefly about sports, for about 15 minutes. LOGINOV said skiing and speed skating were two of his favorite sports, and that his greatest sporting interest in Mexico was playing tennis. Subject said that LOGINOV seemed to be an avid sportsman. LOGINOV said that he was going to Moscow on vacation toward the end of July. No reference was made to Subject teaching LOGINOV's son English when the LOGINOVs return from vacation, but Subject assumes this is still LOGINOV's wish.\n\n8. Subject to KAZANTSEV Make Tapes At Embassy Prior to Class. At one of their classes after KAZANTSEV's return from Moscow, Subject and KAZANTSEV discussed Subject's making tapes for use in connection with his three Embassy classes. It was agreed that Subject would come to the Embassy half an hour or so early once a week to make the tapes. He was to begin on 27 June (the day of our meeting). Subject did not yet know where he was to do the recording, whether he would be left alone, etc.\n\n9. Subject said he was considering having another Dominion Day Party on 1 July to which he would invite his Soviet students. I encouraged the idea and told him I'd pick up the tab.\n\n10. The week of 19 June the wife of President DIAZ Ordas called the Director of the Instituto Irlandes and asked if he could recommend a tutor for a nephew of hers. The director replied that the Institute had a good English teacher and that although he was very busy, he would ask him if he would be willing to take on the nephew. The director communicated the above to Subject, and Subject gave the Director a list of the few hours he had free. The director told Subject he would call Mrs. DIAZ Ordas back and would inform Subject if any of the hours were suitable. As of 27 June, Subject hadn't heard further from the Director.\nMEMO OF CONVERSATION\n\n27 June 1967\n\nLella BELAVAL, Visa Officer of U.S. Embassy\n\n1. I talked to Lella today about her contact with the Soviet who brought BAZAROV's passport in for a visa yesterday. She identified the Soviet from a photograph as Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, and said that he is always the one who comes to the U.S. Embassy for visas. She did not recognize the photograph of Vladislav Sergeyevich KORMUSIKIN, the Vice Consul. Actually, Lella believed that LOGINOV was a Vice Consul, said she always asks for him as such when she has to call the Soviet Embassy.\n\n2. Apparently yesterday was not the first time that LOGINOV has tried to make a date with Lella. She says that he always asks her what she does in her free time, and that she has put him off by saying that she is very busy. Once she asked her whether she spent her free time with other people from the Embassy and was surprised to hear that she usually spends her off hours with non-Embassy friends. Yesterday LOGINOV again asked her what she did in the evenings, and she said she was especially busy now because she has started taking guitar lessons. He mentioned some Soviet dance group that was coming to Mexico in a month or so and said he would like to invite her to go to see them with him. He also told her he was not married. Lella said she did not refuse the invitation outright but said that she did not know whether she would be free when they came or not.\n\n3. I told Lella a few of the facts of Soviet life: that all Soviets have to be married in order to go overseas, that LOGINOV is a KGB officer and was obviously trying to get his foot in the door of the U.S. Embassy through her, that he was undoubtedly disappointed to hear that she did not spend all her free time with other Embassy people, etc. Lella has evidently been unsure about how to react to LOGINOV's advances, has not wanted to be rude to him, and seemed relieved when I suggested that she simply decline his invitations by always being busy. She says she does not like his slick manner at all, and I gather that she has felt uneasy in having to deal with him, but now that someone has told her how to react she will have no problem.\n\n4. Lella mentioned that LOGINOV knows English but is reluctant to use it. He once read off the visa stamped in a passport in perfect English, and he also read a copy of the new visa regulations in English (to himself, but evidently understanding it all). According to the new regulations, Soviets no longer need visas for continuous transit of the U.S. (i.e., on the same flight), but LOGINOV insisted on getting a visa for BAZAROV in spite of this. (This is confirmed in LIENVOY.)\n\nJ.L. WEERING\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\nC.C.: Seminov (P. 1759)\nLOGNOV handwriting sample, received 16 June 1967, from LIRENO\n\nValentin Lognov\n15.60.55\nCounsel\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOVY-5\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 15 June 1967\n\n1. I met with Subject at the Del Paseo from 0900 to 1000. The next meeting is for 18 July at 0830 at the same place.\n\n2. On 8 June LOGINOV dropped by Subject's office to leave two tickets for the Bolshoy Ballet performance on 11 June. Subject invited LOGINOV and his wife for dinner and LOGINOV accepted for 13 June. (COMMENT: LIENVOY reports their confirming this date on 12 June). Subject said the tickets were used by his wife and son.\n\n3. The guests on 13 June were LOGINOV and wife, William de Mier (P-5552), manager of KLM in Mexico and Gustavo ORTIZ Herman (P-10971). ORTIZ was Mexico's first Ambassador to Israel and is very pro-Israel. He recently retired from the Mexican Foreign Service. His last job was Ambassador to Chile. He is 57 years old and apparently a good friend of Subject's. Subject invited ORTIZ because he knew that LOGINOV has been interested in public opinion in Mexico about the recent Israel-Arab war. Subject had been only able to give LOGINOV the opinions of Mexican Jews and he wanted LOGINOV to talk to a real Mexican. The deck was slightly loaded since Subject knew that ORTIZ is an Israeli partisan. Subject purposely avoided the subject but it was not long before ORTIZ asked LOGINOV about the Soviet position on the matter. LOGINOV answered with a banality about the USSR only wanting peace. ORTIZ then unloaded on LOGINOV for about half an hour. He told him that he had been in Israel as ambassador and had seen both sides. If the Soviets were interested in peace, why didn't they help the miserable and diseased Arabs with medicine, hospitals, job training, agricultural aid, etc? This is what they need, not tanks and jets. The Soviets are the real aggressors by arming the Arabs and egging them on. And what fools the Soviets are since the Arabs will never learn to operate any equipment, much less sophisticated stuff. Soviet hypocrisy is obvious to everybody. FEDORENKO's performance at the UN was shameful, etc. LOGINOV never answered a word. Subject later reported the above to the Israeli Ambassador who was pleased since ORTIZ is not a Jew and he is sure the above would be reported to Moscow.\n\n4. LOGINOV said he will leave on 23 July for vacation in the USSR. Subject saw Mrs. LOGINOV for the second time. Since her Spanish is extremely limited, she did not participate in general conversation. However, she handled herself well and did not seem in the least ill at ease. In a side conversation she told Subject that they have a fifteen year old daughter who is living with her mother. She said that she has known LOGINOV since the age of six as neighbors in Moscow. Finally, she said that she is a chemical engineer.\n\n5. I asked if Subject had talked to Miriam AVILA Katz (P-581) again about her contacts with our Embassy. He said he hadn't. I asked what advice he had given her. He said that he had told her to be truthful with the Americans and to be careful with LOGINOV.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nFILE: P-2712 P-11712 P-5552 P-10971 P-581\nOn the 9 May I went with my wife to the reception given by the ambassador of Checoslovakia on the occasion of his National Day. The party took place in the garden where there were a couple of tables seating about ten persons each. Most of the people seating at the tables were from embassies behind the Iron curtain, or local supporters of the extreme left such as Cordero Amador, the painter Marin-Busqued, the art critic Margarita Nelken, Ruth Rivera etc. The Soviets were there headed by Ammar Bazarov and Boris Kazantsev, present also by the name of Tchmikov, Valentin Loguinov, Tchmikov is a young man, about thirty five, speaks very good Spanish and has a rather nice wife. He invited us to attend the exhibition of a film, a Russian film at the embassy the next day, he also when we were leaving said that we had to go to his house soon and have a real Russian dinner. This kind of invitation is most unusual. I do not remember any other sovietico suggesting such a thing.\n\nIn the party there were the usual diplomatic crowd which attends parties of representation behind the Iron Curtain, Max Wery, the Belgian ambassador and his wife, the French ambassador and his wife, the French Counsellor la Tour du Pin and his wife, the architect Lopez Malo who is one of the directors of the Comit\u00e9 Organizador de los Juegos Ol\u00edmpicos, the Italian ambassador and one of his daughters, the Uruguayan ambassador, the Chilean ambassador and Enrique Cobo del Campo the counsellor of the same embassy, the Cuban ambassador Joaquin Hernandez Armas with whom we talked about Venezuela and told me that it was an stupid thing to accuse a country of trying to invade another country with half a dozen men. The chechs had plenty of beer brought checoslovak-\ntwo quin but mixed it with just as much mexican beer if you were not careful. The Brazilian ambassador was there, Guillermo Gimenez Ramirez the charge of Costa Rica, Gonzalo Almeida Urrutia, the ambassador from Ecuador, from the Foreign Office, Nu\u00f1ez Zapata and Flores Tejada. I do not remember seeing anybody from the US, but I arrived somewhat late, Kai Somerto the ambassador from Finland was present and so was the mayor general Natahn Aferi from Ghana, the ambassador was most friendly as well as Jan Hant the commercial counsellor and Jiri \u0160vastka the second secretary in charge of the consulate.\n\nNext day we went to the Soviet embassy for the exhibition of a film whose title I think was the Father of the Soldier, a rather childish film but that brought tears to the eyes of some of the embassy wives who attended. There was an small group of people, including some army officers from the Secretary de la Defensa, and Admiral Aznar Cetina, subsecretario de marina, and amiral Otal Brice\u00f1o, who after a long illness has now some new post in Marina. All the Soviet staff was present, there were two or three cuban including Curvello. There was a change, the doors of the embassy were wide open and there was no question by the people at the outside door, inside Frygov and other fellow received the visitors. There was as usual plenty of vodka, small eats but no caviar, both thing were served before and after the exhibition of the film.\n\nOn the 17th of may we went to a reception for the National day of Noruega. They have a beautiful house in Monte C\u00e1rpatos which had been built for the embassy along their norwegian style; the new ambassador is a tall gaunt, strange man, there were not many people because there was a diplomatic lunch at Relaciones and\nwhite film of the Olympics to Ram rez Vaequez. No Indian around.\nNo Greek\u2014either. Chacha Valden, formerly de Lanz Duret, with\nher new husband, licenciado Lozano. She is the owner of Universal.\nHe was nobody until he married, now he is a well known jurist.\nFrancisco Ag\u00fcera Cenarro, the director of Revista Internacional,\ntrying to impress the French ambassador with the fact that he\nhad printed an editorial on Israel if his magazine, Revista\nInternacional has a circulation of about five hundred copies, but\ngives Ag\u00fcera a good ten thousand pesos a month.\n\nIt was a fairly good party as far as diplomatic parties\ngo, but sterile in results. Nobody appeared to worry\nvery much about the war in the East, and some apple-like the\nParaguayan and the Tobias Eguizabal had the idea that everything\nhad been prepared in advance by the United States and the URSS.\n\nThat there had been a meeting in which the question had been\n\nLoguinov called me to the office to tell me he had tickets\nfor me and my wife for the Bolshoi ballet for Sunday night. We\nhad been unable to secure anything at the office.\nOn Sunday 11 June, Valentin Loguinov was able to obtain for us two good tickets for the Ballet Bolshoi at Bellas Artes and afterwards we went to have something to eat at Lady Baltimore in Madero Street. Very few people were there, which is not surprising in view of the bad quality of their food and poor service. But it was the nearest spot for a quick bite.\n\nLoguinov was very much interested in knowing what my US friends thought about the situation in the Middle East and what they would do about it. He was insistent about the possible help that the US would give to Israel, he said that the US had already given Israel a considerable amount of ammunition and planes, and specially money, the URSS had to give some help to the Arabs in view of the help given to Israel. According to him there was not the slightest doubt that Israel had been the aggressor. The URSS would never consent to any territorial gains by Israel.\n\nDuring our conversation about food, specially about seafood he let it be known that he had been in Mazatl\u00e1n several times.\n\nHe said that everything which had taken place in the Middle East had been plotted in advance by the US and Israel.\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOZY-5\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 3 June 1967\n\n1. After a long hiatus, I called Subject on ca 14 May and learned he was out of the country. I called him again on 6 June and we made a date for 8 June. The meeting was in the breakfast room of the Del Paseo Hotel from 0810 to 0915. The next meeting is at the same place at 0830 on 15 June.\n\n2. Subject was all excited about the Israel/Arab conflict and we spent the best part of the meeting discussing it.\n\n3. He said that LOGINOV called him on 5 June and pressed for a luncheon date the same day. Subject put him off until 8 June. LOGINOV wanted news on the local Jewish reaction, was everybody behind the Jews, was money being contributed, etc. Subject who was madder than hell about Soviet support of the Arabs gave him hell and to direct questions got the admissions from LOGINOV that the Israelis were acting in self-defense and that the Americans and British were not providing the Israelis air cover. LOGINOV mentioned that he would go to the USSR on home leave in July.\n\n4. On 6 June Miriam AVILA Katz, who is also very excited about the war and who told Subject that she had gone to the Israeli Embassy to volunteer to serve in Israel, told Subject that when she returned home on the evening of 5 June, LOGINOV was waiting for her on the street. His purpose was the same as wanting to see Subject, to pump her on local reactions to the war. She also gave LOGINOV hell.\n\n5. She then told Subject that in Holy Week she had been called to the American Embassy and had been asked about her contact with LOGINOV. She said that she had seen the same American (no name given) about two weeks ago. She then told Subject that LOGINOV had asked her to introduce him to \"one of her progressive friends\" or \"someone in the U.S. Embassy\" as a return for the favor of issuing a visa to Dr. Yuriy KUTLER.\n\n6. The above is a capsule account of her relationship with LEVENDERIS. I played innocent until I got the whole story but finally admitted that we had talked to her when he asked, \"if it wasn't you, who?\" I told him that AVILA had noticed that Subject was in contact with us and had in fact worried that her activities (future) might hurt him which she was definitely against.\n\n7. It appears that AVILA told Subject about us because of LOGINOV's appearance on 5 June and her emotional state about the war. I will discuss this further with Subject at the next meeting, particularly what advice he has or will give her about cooperating with us.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nFILE: P-2712 P-11712 P-381\n\nSECRET\nDOI 14 June 1967\n\nSOURCE: LINABIT\n\n14 June 67\n\nLOGINOV (P-11712) visited the Czech Embassy this day. He was driving\ndiplomatic license plate car 19 DA. He was there from 1214 to 1238 hours.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature] P-11712\nSECRET\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Contact with BESABER, 24 May 1967\n\n1. Operational - Per telcon arranged meet at BESABER's hotel room at Del Paso (204). Met from 1830-2030, 24 May. BESABER will call 30 May or 1 June to arrange next meet.\n\n2. Finances - Replenished BESABER's revolving fund.\n\n3. Substance\n   a. Re SOSWIRL - As requested at last meet BESABER turned in bio data on girlfriend he had talked to SOSWIRL operator about. (See attached note from operator). No traces. He will turn in at next meet his version of what he told her. He is most upset by this matter, particularly since I had told him that Headquarters wanted to drop him. I reiterated that he was on probation.\n   b. CHMYKHOV and LOGINOV\n      (P-8235) (P-11712)\n      1). On 20 May CHMYKHOV and LOGINOV arrived at BESABER's plant at about 1400. L was driving a brownish Chevy Impala, 34-DA. L was interested in seeing the house that BESABER had located for the Soviets. He said they wanted a house for three, possibly four months (starting 1 June) and could easily spend up to $8,000 MN per month.\n      2). BESABER could not leave the plant, but put them in touch with a Sra. LARA who took them around to seven houses, one of which they liked. They returned to BESABER's plant at about 1700, sat around for about an hour, leaving because they said the couriers were coming in that night and they had a lot of work to do. (Couriers did arrive that night).\n      3). CHMYKHOV drank heavily (scotch) but did not show any effect; LOGINOV didn't even finish one Scotch and water.\n      4). L said he would probably return to Cuernavaca in a few days to sign the lease on the house and would look BESABER up. BESABER told L that he had a friend with a tennis court and in a few weeks when the friend returned to Mexico he (BESABER) would arrange a day of tennis.\n      5). L did most of the talking although C was pleasant, told a number of good jokes (in poor Spanish) and generally impressed BESABER as being a pleasant type, not \"pesudo,\" as he assesses L.\n   c. Re COIGNE's request and as a follow-up to LIKAYAK/3's report of 28 April 1967 re Lorenzo CARDENAS (P-5409), I asked BESABER if he knew of a house of prostitution at Dr. Manuel Ugarte 1C3 A. He did not, but will check it out through the doormen of several hotels.\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\nPhineas F. SLINKARD\n\nFILE: P-8777 P-5409\n\nSECRET\nEntrada. 12:31 hrs. MP GLORIA PINTO pregunta por LOGUNOV, HD dice que no est\u00e1. GLORIA pide le digan que le llame al 23-62-85. 93-\n\nSalida al 23-62-85. 12:39 hrs. LOGUNOV saluda a GLORIA PINTO. \u00c9sta dice que lo llamaba hace rato para darle las gracias de parte de su se\u00f1ora por la visa que le dio. LOGUNOV que est\u00e1 bien, GLORIA tambi\u00e9n le llama porque RUTH va a ir a fin de semana a Valle de Bravo y le invitan a ir. LOGUNOV no puede porque el domingo sale un compa\u00f1ero a Mosc\u00fa y lo tiene que ir a despedir, pero puede ser para la otra semana. GLORIA que para el d\u00eda 27 es la Copa Davis, y tal vez no puedan ir. LOGUNOV que entonces ya ser\u00e1 despu\u00e9s. GLORIA comenta que ALFONSO va a estar a las cinco en el caf\u00e9 \"El Jujuy\". LOGUNOV va a tratar de estar all\u00ed un rato para saludarlos.\n\n- GLORIA pide paso por ella y de all\u00ed se van juntos. LOGUNOV no tiene mucho tiempo porque est\u00e1 haciendo las 50 visas de...\n\n... la Selecci\u00f3n Mexicana de F\u00fatbol, pero va a tratar de estar a las cinco en el caf\u00e9. GLORIA que est\u00e1 bien. 144-\n\n156055\n17 Mayo 1967\nP-11712\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: Miriam AVILA Katz - P-581\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 11 May 1967\n\n1. My last meeting with Subject was on 23 March, at which time she agreed to provide information on LOGINOV obtained during their normal business contact and any further social contact initiated by him. She was to call me after their next date or any other significant contact she had with him. Since I had not heard from her, I called her at her apartment about 2115 on 11 May. I apologized for calling so late, but said I had just got out of work and had a package for her I had brought back from the States which I wanted to deliver before the contents got stale. Could I drop over that night or perhaps another evening. Subject immediately recognized the \"package\" as the Benson and Hedges cigarettes I had promised her, gently protested, and then told me she was not feeling well, but the doctor had told her she had to eat, and it so happened she was just going out for a bite when I called. I consequently suggested we have dinner together, which we did from 2145-1215 at the Gondola. Afterwards, we went around the corner to her apartment for a nightcap until 0200.\n\n2. Subject had lost 8 or 10 pounds and looked a bit thin and not as attractive as I had remembered her. She told me she was simply working too hard and not eating and sleeping properly. I had some fear that she might have had some second\nthoughts in the seven weeks since she had agreed to cooperate, but it proved unfounded. She this time was relaxed from the start, was very friendly, and seemed to enjoy the opportunity to get out. (She later told me in her apartment that she didn't go out much, liked to spend her evenings at home reading, listening to records, tending to her dwarf trees, etc.) She made it clear from the start that she hadn't changed her mind by warning me half-seriously and half-playfully that I shouldn't think I could \"buy\" her with gifts. \"You've bought me up here,\" she said, tapping her head with her forefinger. \"That's the only way you'll get anywhere with me.\" Most of the evening was spent in general and (especially back at her apartment) increasingly fuzzy discussion of Israel, the Jews, her job, the Russians \"as people,\" her very humanistic philosophy about life, and I don't exactly remember what else. She is definitely a smart girl, but I think less profound and sophisticated than she tries to appear. Otherwise, she seems to be a very sincere person, and she has given me no reason to doubt or suspect anything she has told me.\n\n3. Contact with LOGINOV. Subject said she hadn't been out with LOGINOV since our last meeting and had had only one face-to-face contact with him. She said this was a little over a month ago (early April) and was occasioned by her efforts to help a client by the name of Dr. Yury KUTTLER get a Soviet visa. She said KUTTLER is a dentist and definitely a Communist sympathizer, if not a Communist. (KUTTLER has T-file 1573.) KUTTLER evidently thought he was liked by the\nRussians in return, as he initially told Subject he was expecting an official Soviet invitation to visit the USSR. As it turned out, however, he had a hard time even getting a Soviet visa. Subject finally called LOGINOV herself to try to push things along, but LOGINOV showed no willingness to facilitate things. (LIENVOY has Subject on the phone to LOGINOV on 5 April. After discussing KUTTLER's case, Subject remarked to LOGINOV that she understood that \"you (ustedes) must have some reason not to want to give him (KUTTLER) the visa.\" LOGINOV replied that there were \"reasons enough.\")\n\n4. A day or two after her telephone conversation with LOGINOV, Subject said she went over to the Soviet Embassy personally to see if she could get anywhere with LOGINOV. LOGINOV received her cordially, and for the first time asked her into his office (she said it was the first office off the outside Reception Room). She again asked LOGINOV to try to speed up the granting of KUTTLER's visa. LOGINOV hemmed and hawed, indicating that he wasn't even sure the visa would be granted. He finally told Subject that look, he had gone to KUTTLER for dental work once, and KUTTLER had charged him much too much. Consequently, he said, he wasn't going to give him a visa. Subject said she could not tell if the dentist bill was the real reason for LOGINOV's negative attitude, but when she persisted, LOGINOV finally relented and the following exchange ensued:\nLOGINOV: \"All right, Miriam, I'll do it for you (i.e., give KUTLER the visa). But you know, a favor must be repaid by a favor.\"\n\nSubject: \"All right...in that case, let me in the name of the company invite you to dinner.\"\n\nLOGINOV: \"No, Miriam, I don't mean that.\"\n\nLOGINOV then went on to say that as he had mentioned to her before, he would like her to introduce him to \"someone who would be sympathetic to us\" (i.e., to the Soviets). LOGINOV emphasized that he realized Subject might not agree with this \"someone's\" ideas, but stated that he knew Subject was the type of person who \"had respect for other people's views.\"\n\nSubject said that she replied in a casual, almost flippant manner that \"well, sure, if she met such a person, she'd introduce them.\" With this the subject was dropped and Subject left.\n\n5. LICOZY-5. Subject on her own initiative began telling me what a terrific guy her boss is. He according to her, has one of the most winning personalities of anyone she has ever met. At the same time he is extremely intelligent and shrewd.\n\n\"If he can't get what he wants through charm, he does it by pure shrewdness.\" This is why he is such a successful businessman.\n\nIn reply to a question about LICOZY-5's background, Subject said he had been born in Poland, was imprisoned by either the Poles or Germans just before or during World War II (she was rather vague on this point, and I confined myself to listening), somehow got out and joined the Russians, taking part in the Soviet invasion of Germany. Somehow he had survived all this, made his way to Mexico, where he arrived penniless, and now\nmust have a small fortune in the bank. He vividly remembers his former hardships, however, is a very generous and humane person, and every year sends clothes to people in Poland and Russia. He also has a very strong feeling for Israel. Obviously he couldn't have survived a life like this if he weren't shrewd. He has no love for the Russians, but was not above joining them to assure his own survival in World War II and can be agreeable enough toward them to retain their travel business. Subject gave absolutely no indication that she had said anything to LICOZY-5 about me.\n\n6. The conversation was the most relaxed as well as the funniest back at Subject's apartment, where we finished a bottle of vodka LOGINOV had given LICOZY-5 and LICOZY-5 had given her. Back on the subject of LOGINOV, Subject said she \"supposed\" he had tried to cultivate a lot of girls like herself...\"hadn't her?\" (I had told Subject at our last meeting that young women were among LOGINOV's favorite targets, but hadn't been able to tell what effect this \"revolution\" had on her. Now it appeared that it had hit home and that it had wounded her pride to think he not only had had ulterior motives in dating her, but had dated other girls the same way.) I didn't reply directly, but said something about LOGINOV being as smooth as they come. Subject wasn't satisfied with this, however, and pressed me: \"He has tried the same thing with other girls, hasn't he?\"\n\n\"Yes, Miriam, several,\" I finally said. This seemed to satisfy her.\n\n7. Shortly thereafter, I asked Subject if LOGINOV were\nEntrada: HP WILTSHERE (?) pregunta por LOGINOV para si puede pasar a verlo, pues se trata de la agencia de viajes Servisa. VALA dice que espera. Despu\u00e9s WELCHER comenta con LOGINOV que el estuvo en el a\u00f1o de 1945 cuando la ca\u00edda de Berl\u00edn y conoce un poco la historia de la victoria rusa sobre los nazi-fascistas. LOGINOV cambia de tema y pregunta si tiene algunas visas pendientes, WELCHER dice que tiene algunos pasaportes que pasar a recoger y sirve que lo invita a su casa.\n\nLOGINOV lo espera. 521-\n\n480: Subject (giving name as WILSHER), an American asks for LOGINOV and tells him that he just wanted to be sure that LOGINOV would be in as he had called yesterday (9 May) and he had not been in. LOGINOV tells WILSHER that 9 May is a Holiday and commemorates the Russian Victory in Berlin, Germany on 9 May 1945. WILSHER says he remembers that as he was in the war in that area at the time and remembers that. WILSHER wants to go by to see LOGINOV to pick up some passports. WILSHER also would like to invite LOGINOV out to his house. LOGINOV says he can come by to pick up the visas.\nA las 10:45 horas del d\u00eda 2 de mayo de 1967, en la Casa de Gobierno de la Ciudad de M\u00e9xico, se present\u00f3 ante el Presidente de la Rep\u00fablica, Lic. Adolfo L\u00f3pez Mateos, el se\u00f1or Dr. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda V\u00e1zquez de Coronado, Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores, quien le present\u00f3 un documento que conten\u00eda una petici\u00f3n de ayuda para la soluci\u00f3n de un problema internacional.\n\nLos Hechos:\n\nSe hace notar que el documento antes descrito se entreg\u00f3 formalmente a la Secretar\u00eda de Relaciones Exteriores.\n\nRespectuoso,\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Date: 2 de mayo de 1967]\n3 May 67\n\nIn LARK's account of his first two meetings with LOGUNOV. It appears to me that at the second meeting, 26 April, he moved in a lot faster than is customary with the Sovs. For this reason I wonder if possibly the Soviets are deliberately trying to get a look at him independent from LOGUNOV, who may well have been reporting regularly his meetings with LARK.\n\nHe understands he is not to be dangled in front of Sovs, and I told him that after today's tennis match, he is to make himself unavailable for two or three weeks for tennis (or the movies) and see what kind of initiative L is prepared to take.\n\nThis would, however, allow us to plant an American girl at the French Club if we wished and play her into L's hands. Will discuss with Paul when he returns.\n\nI agree.\n\nDogs\n\nDid show to Paul & Cynthia.\n\n[Signature]\n\nCC: Val LOGUNOV (P. dme. ch)\nVALENTIN S. LOGUNOV\n\n1. Contact. First met April 22, 1957. He asked my wife and I if he and an American born Mexican friend could join us in doubles. Saturdays the tennis courts are filled. I was reluctant at first until I realized his accent and suspected that he was one of the persons for whom I have pictures on file.\n\n2. HEILTY. Counsel of the USSR embassy.\n\n3. Susceptibility. Eager to visit the U.S. Possibly interested in the material things of life, possibly overly interested in girls. Seems convinced of the value of Marxism.\n\n4. Personality. Very friendly and direct. Wishes his embassy enjoyed club privileges such as the U.S. at the Reform Club. He likes caviar, vodka, and drinks several beers quickly. He is a little demonstrative in gestures of head and hands. It is too early to evaluate his gestures with his attitudes or the topics being discussed.\n\n5. English. He is eager to improve his English, which he speaks rather poorly. His son Dally speaks only Russian, no Spanish or English.\n\n6. Dina. His daughter, 14, is in an English school in Moscow.\n\n7. Chess. Plays, but not a fan.\n\n8. Athletics. He plays excellent tennis for someone who claims he has played less than a year and never more than once a week. He has the face, build, and carriage of a trained athlete. He has the build of a boxer or wrestler. He has the grace of a natural athlete. I would guess him to be unusually strong. He boxed when younger, plays basketball and volleyball.\n\n9. Spanish. Speaks good Spanish. Studied for one year in Moscow.\n\n10. Desire for contact. Val proposed that we meet regularly for tennis at 1000 hours every Wednesday. He asked if it bothered me to be seen with a Soviet. He said many U.S. diplomats seemed to shun him. He also suggested that we not limit our contacts to tennis but that we go to a movie sometime with our wives.\n11. **Dina-data.** Apparently has limited income. He has no servant, no TV, no telephone.\n\n12. **Leonova.** Val seemed somewhat cool about the Leonova. Naturally he knows them, but doesn't seem to consider them friends.\n\n13. **Personality.** Does not smoke. He did before.\n\n14. **U.S. Trip.** Val is going to Moscow in July. He wants to spend 2 to 3 days in New York. He said he had read much about New York but wanted to see it for himself.\n\nApril 23, 1967, P.M.\n\n1. **Contact.** Upon leaving the club, we saw and greeted Val at poolside watching his son swim. He reminded me about our Wednesday date.\n\nApril 26, 1967, 3:00 hours\n\n1. **Contact.** Our tennis date.\n\n2. **Information.**\n\n   A. **By accident.** Val asked if I had occasion to go to the U.S. embassy and if I knew anyone in the embassy. I answered no to both.\n\n   B. **FBI.** Val was still concerned about my innocence and lack of fear in being seen with a Soviet. I joked about not seeing any FBI in the area. He blushed and said he really knew that there were very many FBI agents here.\n\n   C. **Embassy telephone.** Val requested that I not use his embassy phone number on his calling card. He explained that he is all over the embassy and that it is difficult to locate him.\n\n   D. **American girls.** Val asked me if I knew any American girls here. He suggested I bring two for our tennis date. He wants to meet U.S. girls to practice his English. He said that in one year here he has failed\nto make a friend of any U.S. girls. He did pay one girl to give him lessons, but he felt she lacked background in grammar. I kidded him and implied that he was looking for something more than English lessons and that Mexican girls struck me as being far sexier. He accepted the remark that his interests in girls was more broad than just language training, but he insisted on U.S. girls.\n\nE. Svoboda defection. Val said that the Svoboda defection bothered him. He feels the U.S. bought Svoboda, that she is crazy and that her defection will hurt U.S.-USSR relations. I offered to be bought by the USSR to balance the defections. He said I wasn't worth anything to the USSR.\n\nF. Thing. Val is going out of town this weekend. He was in Acapulco recently.\n\nG. From club. Many people greeted Val at the club.\n\nH. Embassy holidays. Val said the embassy would be closed May 1-4 and that no receptions were planned. This contradicts Nick.\n\n3. Susceptibility. Nick is a U.S.-Viet. He believes that U.S. politics are in the hands of 16 men, the Rockefellers, etc. These men make fortunes off military contracts and want the war to continue. He claims that Viet-Nam is a civil war fostered by the U.S. The U.S. cannot win because the U.S. has formed an artificial barrier dividing two people. I suggested that it was not unlike Germany which is two people divided. He seemed annoyed at the comparison and tried to explain it in complex terms which I chose not to debate. I told him politics discouraged me since I knew from history that the actions of today are governed by secret agreements which we will not be privileged to learn of for another 50 or 100 years. Val hastened to say that he did not insist on talking about politics. If at any time I should like to discuss politics he is at my disposal, but is willing to discuss anything at all.\n\n4. Houston. Val has always wanted to visit Houston. He regrets the U.S. restrictions on travel there. He supposes the U.S. has any secrets there to hide. I said that he was obviously a dangerous person.\n\n5. Girl-friend. Val spoke of his girl-friend in Moscow whose sister is dying of cancer. He used the word \"girl-friend,\" but his English might be weak here. He might have meant a female acquaintance of his wife and him.\n6. \"Dialectics\". Dialectics is the law, according to Val, which proves that the U.S. cannot win in Viet-Nam\u2014a people defending its own land against invaders.\n\n5. Personality. Val plays better tennis than I. He drank three beers after our tennis. It was he who insisted we go to the bar after tennis. He told several jokes, some silly dirty, some fairly good. He will get me a copy of Soviet Life which discussed Soviet tennis. He paid for the ball-boys and for the drinks. His investment was about 16 pesos.\n\n6. Mio-data. His wife name is Alexandra. She is bothered by the altitude. He drives a green Chevy, 1961. His wife speaks little Spanish or English, and some French. He is third secretary in charge of visas to the USSR.\n\nOUTPOST\n\n1. Trying to recruit U.S. secretary. I would guess that Val is trying to state the requirements for his U.S. girlfriend in such a way as to exclude all but secretaries at the U.S. embassy. He wants someone with culture, good knowledge of the language. He did not deny, nor confirm, that his interests might be amorous, but he rejected the idea of anyone but a U.S. type.\n\nApril 27, 1967. Telephone\n\n1. Movies cancelled. Val had suggested that we go to the movies together. Then he learned that my wife enjoys Soviet movies. I cited several we had seen. He suggested that we all see the movie now at the Versailles. We agreed. He then added saying his wife was sick. Suggested we wait until next week. Reminded me of our tennis date next Wednesday.\n\nMay 2, 1967.\n\n1. Contact. I played tennis with a client. My wife played with an instructor. She mentioned to me that while we were still playing she saw Val who had dropped off his wife, another woman and Dainty. Val was very friendly, but neglected to introduce his wife or her friend. The wife nodded. On leaving the club Val was returning. We spoke for several seconds confirming our date for Wednesday. He made no effort to introduce the man with him.\nSECRET\n\nDate: April 26, 1967\n\nTo: Mr. Winston M. Scott\n\nFrom: Nathan L. Ferris\nLegal Attach\u00e9\n\nSubject: DORIS ALEKSANDROVICH KIZAN'TSEV; ET AL\n105-107 (4-26-67)*\n\nThis document is for the use of your agency only and must not be further distributed without appropriate authorization.\n\nReference is made to your memorandum dated February 28, 1967, # 11,513, captioned \"Travel of Soviets\".\n\nNo specific information has been received concerning the travel of the individuals mentioned in referenced letter.\n\nReliable sources, including Vice Consul Richard Booth, American Consulate, Veracruz, have advised that Mexican authorities are exercising strict control over visits to Soviet vessels and trips ashore by members of the crews. Loginov recently met Booth at Lopez Hormazos, shipping agents, and asked Booth if he could do something about the refusal of Mexican officials to permit crew members to come ashore.\n\nYou will be advised when additional information is received concerning this matter.\n\ncc: 11712\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Redacted]\n\n[Redacted]\n\n[Redacted]\nLILYRIC, 18 April 1967, 1018 hours this woman entered SovEmb, came out with LOGINOV at 1036 hours and they walked off together.\n4. AELITE: Subject reported that AELITE was in the store from 1200 to 1815 on 14 April. AELITE told him that he would come to Subject's home on Sunday, 23 April, for dinner. AQUALITY came in later and Subject related the above to him. AQUALITY suggested that Subject call AELITE at the Embassy on 22 April to confirm the dinner so that Subject would not waste money by preparing a dinner to which AELITE did not come. I told Subject to call AELITE on 21 April since 22 April is a Saturday and AELITE might not be at work. (COMMENT: There was no call on LIKNOV).\n\n5. On 19 April 1967 at ca 1130 4 young Mexican males arrived in a new VW with temporary permit 1091021. They entered the Embassy and talked to LOGNOV.\n\n6. Subject's notes for the period 31 March to 19 April 1967 are attached.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nSECRET\n4. AEXITE: Subject reported that AEXITE was in the store from 1200 to 1315 on 14 April. AEXITE told him that he would come to Subject's home on Sunday, 23 April, for dinner. AQUALITY came in later and Subject related the above to him. AQUALITY suggested that Subject call AEXITE at the Embassy on 23 April to confirm the dinner so that Subject would not waste money by preparing a dinner to which AEXITE did not come. I told Subject to call AEXITE on 31 April since 22 April is a Saturday and AEXITE might not be at work. (COMMENT: There was no call on LIFROY).\n\n5. On 12 April 1967 at ca 1130 4 young Mexican males arrived in a new VW with temporary permit 1991021. They entered the Embassy and talked to LOGIROY.\n\n6. Subject's notes for the period 31 March to 15 April 1967 are attached.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nSECRET\nKodak to give English lessons. It was agreed they'd discuss the matter further when Subject (not to be left out of a good thing) visited TROCONIS at Kodak to take advantage of that 30-40% discount. Subject even wanted to get me some film at these fabulous prices, but I said I didn't need any at the moment. I did say, however, that any relationship that developed between TROCONIS and the Soviets would naturally be of interest to us and I'd like to have Subject remain alert to anything he heard from either the Soviets or TROCONIS. Subject said he would.\n\nLOGINOV. As previously reported, Subject has seen LOGINOV on numerous occasions on the Embassy grounds and in the first office off the Reception Room. They usually exchange greetings in English. On 30 March, LOGINOV came up to Subject in the Reception Room and said that he'd like to speak to Subject about English lessons for his 8-year-old son. Subject said fine, and it was agreed Subject would drop into LOGINOV's office (i.e., off the Reception Room) when he was through with his classes that afternoon. When Subject returned about 1830, however, LOGINOV was just getting ready to leave and it was agreed they'd try to get together another time. They finally did so on 11 April. Subject went to LOGINOV's office about 1830 and stayed 15 or 20 minutes. LOGINOV in a very relaxed and casual manner, explained that he had an 8-year-old son whom he wanted to learn English. He said the boy knew no English and very little Spanish. He stated that they were going to Moscow on vacation in July and would be back in August, and he consequently didn't want to begin the\nlessons until they returned, but he wanted to tentatively explore the matter with Subject now. He stated\u2014in English\u2014that he would like Subject \"to go to teach\" the boy, the implication being, according to Subject, that the lessons were to be given at LOGINOV's home. If Subject couldn't give the boy lessons when it came time, LOGINOV said he hoped Subject would be able to recommend someone else. Subject said he'd be happy to teach the boy if he had time, but that it was of course too early to know whether he would be able to fit him into his schedule in August. LOGINOV said he understood and they could talk in specifics in August. LOGINOV added only that he planned to pick up a special text (or set of texts) for teaching children English when he was in Moscow.\n\n5. Subject said that LOGINOV had a pile of perhaps 30-35 passports on his desk on 11 April. Subject commented on LOGINOV's apparently heavy work load, and LOGINOV replied casually: \"Well, you know there are a lot of people who want to visit the Soviet Union.\" He continued that most of the passports on his desk were Mexican, but \"several\" were American. He then began shuffling through the pile until he came to one belonging to an American girl. He opened the passport to her picture and showed it to Subject as an illustration. Subject said he couldn't make out the name, but the picture was of a good-looking, blondish girl who appeared to be 23 or 24 years old. This was the only passport LOGINOV showed Subject, and the conversational topic was thereupon dropped. At the end of the conversation, LOGINOV stated that he certainly would appreciate it if Subject could teach his son and he'd\nget together again with Subject in August.\n\n6. I asked Subject if he thought he would have time to teach the boy. Subject said it was impossible to tell, but he could probably make time if we considered it important enough. I told Subject there was a good chance we would and in any case not to give LOGINOV a negative answer before consulting me. I explained that LOGINOV was KGB and one of the most able men in the Embassy, and warned Subject to be on his toes in his relations with him.\n\n7. Subject conducted 11 classes at the Soviet Embassy during the reporting period.\n\n28 March\n1545-1700 -- BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, ROMANCHENKO\n1700-1815 -- KAZANTSEV. BAZAROV and his wife were supposed to have their first class from 1700-1830, but KAZANTSEV said the Ambassador was too busy. No mention was made of his wife. (The BAZAROV classes are scheduled for Tuesdays and Fridays from 1700-1830. Classes for KAZANTSEV, BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, and ROMANCHENKO are scheduled for Tuesdays and Thursdays.)\n\n30 March\n1545-1700 -- BEDRIN, GONCHARENKO, ROMANCHENKO\n1700-1800 -- KAZANTSEV. KAZANTSEV said that BAZAROV expected to be tied up with the Soviet Petroleum Congress delegation and probably would not be able to make his 1700-1830 class on Friday, the 31st. If not, KAZANTSEV said, GONCHARENKO would use the time, since he was somewhat behind BEDRIN and ROMANCHENKO.\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: Ernst G\u00f6bel\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 10 April 1967\n\n1. I met Subject at his office from 1845 to 1915 on 10 April 1967. My purpose was to see if he knew Herbert Adolf Pelka (P-11712). Subject said that he didn't know either Pelka or the two German witnesses to his marriage. However he does have a friend, a secretary at Telefunken where Pelka works. He will check this girl and elicit information on Pelka.\n\n2. Subject reported that he had noticed that Ralph Wiegandt has become quite friendly at the French Club as a tennis partner of Loginov. (COMMENT: Per Liebwy Wiegandt and wife invited Loginov to dinner in March 1967). Wiegandt is a German who came to Mexico after WW II. He formerly worked for Rieboldt Chemical in Germany. His wife is from a well-known German-Mexican family from Guadalajara, n\u00e9e Bahnken. His father is a Dr. of chemistry from Stuttgart who recently came to Mexico. Wiegandt owns or has a controlling interest in Barnices Aislantes, S.A., located at Avenida Tolteca 176. This company manufactures plastic foam insulating materials. He lives in Coyocacan in a house which he recently had built, Europa 26. Subject dislikes Wiegandt whom he describes as a pushy, ambitious businessman. The implication is that he is unscrupulous and would do anything for a buck. Subject doesn't know anything about his politics. Subject will obtain more background information on him.\n\nPaul Dillon\n\nFILE: P-12330 P-11712 New P for Pelka\n\nNew P for Wiegandt\n\nSECRET\nM\u00c9XICO, D.F. A 9 DE ABRIL DE 1967.\n\nAL SR. ADOLFO BUCIO, PER\u00daCICOS EN EL DEPARTAMENTO DE TR\u00c1FICO DE LA CIA. L\u00cdNEAS A\u00c9REAS BOLIVIANAS EN EL TURCO CENTRAL AEREO EN EL A\u00d1O DE 1959, DESDE COPIABA, EL CARGO DE ENVIADO DE POSTALES.\n\nEN EL A\u00d1O DE 1963 LO TRASLADARON A LAS OFICINAS DE SABENA EN EL CENTRO, EN LAS CALLES DE LA REFORMA # 52 OCUPANDO EL CARGO DE ENVIADO DE VENTAS. EN EL A\u00d1O DE 1964 FUE NOMBRAO JEFE DE DICHO DEPARTAMENTO. EN ENERO DE 1966 INICI\u00d3 A LA CIA.\n\nEL SR. ADOLFO BUCIO TRABAJA ACTUALMENTE EN LA CIA. DE AVIACI\u00d3N \"AIR INDIA\" EN LAS CALLES DE LA REFORMA # 116 CON TELEFONO 46-67-69 EN EL DEPARTAMENTO DE VENTAS.\n\nEL SR. BUCIO EST\u00c1 CASADO CON UNA SE\u00d1ORA DE NACIONALIDAD FRANCESA, MUY A LA DECORACI\u00d3N DE CASAS Y MODISTA. Tienen su DOMICILIO PARTICULAR EN LAS CALLES DE BAH\u00cdA DE DURANGO # 10, COL. AVENIDA ANG\u00c9LICA.\n\nEN EL TIEMPO QUE TRABAJ\u00d3 AL SR. BUCIO EN EL TURCO CENTRAL AEREO BOLIVIANO HAB\u00cdA DE POL\u00cdTICA DESCOCIONDO SU POSICI\u00d3N.\n\nEL SR. BUCIO HAB\u00cdA INGL\u00c9S ESPA\u00d1OL ITALIANO Y ACTUALMENTE ESTUDIA FRANC\u00c9S.\n\nused to be quite friendly with 606W0V - less contact since B. mixed to Air India.\n\nCARDED\n\nP-11712\nSECRET\n\n30 March 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nathan L. Ferris, Legal Attach\u00e9\nFROM: Winston N. Scott\nSUBJECT: Unidentified Visitor to the Soviet Embassy\n\n1. Reference is made to our memorandum on the same subject, dated 17 March 1967.\n\n2. Attached are two photographs of the man who visited the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City on 9 March 1967 driving a car with Florida tags # 10-W-7776.\n\nTHIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.\n\nAttachment:\n\nPhotos\n\nDistribution:\n\nOriginal - Addressee, w/att., B/W\n1 = 50-2-4/A, w/o\n1 = 50-8-10/11, w/att.\n1 = P-11712, w/o\n1 = Memo Chron, w/o\n2 = Wash pouch, w/att.\n\nJonathan L. Weening/fkm\n30 March 1967\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: MIRIAM AVILA KATZ\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 23 March 1967 (La Pergola Restaurant, 1100-1615)\n\n1. Subject works at Mundos Tours, where she is in charge of travel to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. In this job, she deals with LOGINOV on visa matters. However, as far back as June 1966, LIENVOY indicated the existence of something more than simply a business relationship between them. Then in January 1967, Paul Dillon elicited from LICOZY-5 the information that Subject definitely had a social relationship with LOGINOV, as well as some basic biographic data: she was about 25 or 26 years old, a Mexican citizen with a Mexican father and \"Jewish\" mother, intelligent, definitely not pro-Soviet, and had gone to college for two years in the United States. The problem in arranging a meeting with her was to do so in such a way that she would be either disinclined or unable to say anything to LICOZY-5 or anyone else about the meeting before it took place. It was hoped that at the meeting she could be persuaded to keep the contact to herself.\n\n2. Learning on 23 March that Mundos Tours was closed that day and that LICOZY-5 was out of town, I called Subject at her apartment that morning about 1115. I identified myself as an officer at the American Embassy, stated there was a matter on which I thought she might be able to be of some help to the Embassy, and asked if she by any chance were free to have lunch with me that day, or, if not, to call me sometime later.\n\nCopies: P-117/2 P-27/2\nIf we could arrange something else. Subject professed dismay, that the American Embassy even knew she existed, let alone that she could possibly be of any help to the Embassy. She then became very defensive and only reluctantly agreed to meet me for lunch at the Fergola Restaurant at 11:00. The Fergola is just a few blocks from her apartment.\n\n3. Subject was waiting for me in front of the restaurant when I arrived a couple of minutes before the hour. I found a trim, stylishly dressed young woman with glasses and long, dark hair pulled straight back from her forehead. The glasses, exposed forehead, and hair style gave her a sophisticated look which turned out to perfectly express her personality. She did not at first strike me as particularly attractive, but this was probably because she was tensed up to the point that she was pale and expressionless and actually trembled slightly when we first spoke. I later found her, especially when she took off her glasses, to be quite attractive, and it is reasonable to assume that LOGINOV is attracted by more than her personality.\n\n4. The first 15 minutes were tough going. Subject was defensive to the point of hostility and totally unresponsive to efforts to break through to her on a personal level. Fortunately, she agreed to a drink before asking flatly what it was I wanted. I replied directly but in a friendly manner that through routine investigation, it had come to our attention that she had a social relationship with Valentin LOGINOV. I continued that while her personal life normally wouldn't be of any concern to the American Embassy, the fact was that the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City was a major base for espionage and subversion against both\nMexico and the United States and that LOGINOV was one of the Soviets' most able and active intelligence officers. One of the areas where he was most active, I continued, was in establishing relationships with young women like herself. For this purpose, I said, he used various lines, alternatively telling girls he was unmarried, divorced, or that his wife was in the Soviet Union. (This brought the first expression of any kind from Subject, who smiled faintly when I mentioned his using the line that his wife was in the USSR. According to LICOZY-5, this is what LOGINOV had told Subject.) Encouraged by the fact that Subject was at least listening, I went further into the seriousness of the Soviet presence in Mexico, hitting hard the fact that the Soviets threatened the security of both the U.S. and Mexico, individually and collectively. When I finished, I told Subject that I was telling her all this both so that she would know whom she was dealing with in LOGINOV and because I frankly hoped that understanding the situation, she would be willing to discuss LOGINOV with me.\n\n5. To my disappointment, Subject replied with undiminished defensiveness that all right, she had gone out with LOGINOV a few times. Because of her job as head of East European travel at Mundo Tours, she had met and had to deal with LOGINOV on visa matters. One day he had casually asked if she were free that night and had invited her out. He had always been helpful to her and she felt it was good business to accept the invitation. In all, she had gone out with him \"three or four times\"\u2014usually to dinner, the movies, a coffee nightcap, and then \"always\nstraight home.\" She admittedly enjoyed his company. She considered herself \"an intelligent person,\" and wouldn't go out with just anybody. He too had to be intelligent and had to be an enjoyable companion. LOGINOV fit this bill. He was \"extremely intelligent,\" very considerate, an interesting conversationalist, completely unlike the usual ill-mannered, boorish Soviet. But that's all there was to their relationship. That's absolutely all there was to it. They never discussed politics, and even if LOGINOV wanted to do so, she'd refuse, because she had absolutely no interest in politics. She had her own life to lead, and what one side said made no more dent in her than what the other side said. Reflecting for a moment on the above, Subject then added almost disgustedly that when she began seeing LOGINOV she had more or less expected that her name would wind up in the American Embassy's files.\n\n6. Subject said all of the above as though she were on the stand and showed no intention of volunteering any more. I consequently felt there was not much more I could do with her and that I had foreclosed any possibilities there might have been with the wrong approach, whatever the right one may have been. Moreover, at this moment, a well-dressed Mexican who looked to be in his early 30's came up to the table, greeted Subject, and invited himself to sit down. Subject, apparently as surprised as I, introduced him as Alejandro ALVAREZ (no Station traces) of ALVAREZ AUTOMOTRIZ, a local firm which makes springs for Volkswagens. Subject told me later that his father owns the business. Alejandro, according to Subject, had once been her professor in an accounting course at business school.\nhere in Mexico City. Subject also said that Alejandro and his firm were good customers of Mundos Tours, and that Alejandro had in fact just recently returned from a three week trip to Germany. He spoke some English.\n\n7. The appearance of ALVAREZ, who by now was ordering his first of two martinis, seemed to end any remaining chances of getting anywhere with the girl. As it worked out, however, his appearance had just the opposite effect, because it provided more than an hour of conversation on an increasingly friendly and personal level. By her second drink, Subject was even managing a few laughs. Eventually we got onto the subject of Israel, which, thanks to the information supplied by LICOZY-5, I knew she had visited and had become romantically involved with, she herself being half Jewish. I expressed considerable interest in her trip and Israel in general, and she seemed delighted to tell me about both. It then turned out that her mother\u2014who Subject said is a U.S. citizen\u2014had lived in Moldavia, had told her daughter vivid stories of pogroms carried out by the Russians against the Jews, and had fled Romania before the invading Russians (evidently during World War II.) The fact that I had been in Romania and Moldavia was good for another ten minutes of conversation and seemed to impress Subject far beyond its worth. In any event, by the time ALVAREZ left, Subject and I were on a first name basis and she was telling me how glad she was she had met me\u2014all of which I attribute to luck (ALVAREZ, who even quietly paid the check when leaving) and dubonnet cocktails.\n8. During the above conversation, we also discussed the United States, including President Kennedy, whom both Subject and ALVAREZ claimed greatly to have admired, and Subject's experience in the U.S., where she attended Kent State University in Ohio. She stated at this time that she regarded the U.S. as a second home. She also expressed love for Mexico and together with ALVAREZ, took pride in pointing to Mexico's progress.\n\n9. Following ALVAREZ's departure, Subject looked at me as though I were a bad dog or something and asked in a scolding tone how I could have ever suspected her of cooperating with LOGINOV. No, she just couldn't understand it. I replied that I hadn't suspected her and reminded her that I hadn't said I did. I then said more seriously that there was one thing that bothered me, however. On the one hand, she told me she loved Mexico and regarded the U.S. as her second country; yet on the other, she claimed to be totally apolitical. The Soviets in Mexico, I repeated, were working to undermine both countries, and proceeded to go over again much of what I had said earlier. I stated that it was incredible to me that Soviet activities in Mexico didn't make any difference to her. I had contacted her, I said, not because I had any suspicion of her, but because from the little I knew of her I had hoped she'd cooperate in helping us learn more about LOGINOV and his activities in Mexico. Subject thereupon protested that there was nothing more she could tell me. She had told me everything worth telling about their association. Moreover, she hadn't seen him since Christmas time. LOGINOV was smart, never talked about anything sensitive, and could probably never be induced to do so. The only thing\nhe had ever asked her of an even remotely suspicious or interesting nature was whether she had any friends at the American Embassy. She said she had replied tartly that she had friends everywhere, and that LOGINOV hadn't bothered her with such questions since. In short, she didn't see how she could be of any help. I replied that since it was I who need the help, this was for me to decide, that whether she liked it or not she was in contact with an important Soviet intelligence officer who was of great interest to the United States, and that now that I knew her better, I was confident she had the intelligence and judgment to help us. I did not want to interfere in any way in her personal life. Nor did I really want her to do anything in the sense that she would have to go out of her way. All I wanted was that she be as observant as possible during her normal contacts and dates with LOGINOV, to try to see into the man, what made him tick, what his problems were, whether he was satisfied with his work, how he liked to relax, what did he enjoy, what did he want, etc. Then after each substantial contact, most probably a date, I'd like to have the opportunity to sit down with her over lunch or wherever it be and discuss her observations. This was all I was asking. All right, if that's all I wanted, she'd do it.\n\n10. There was, I said, one thing I wanted to impress on her: if we were to obtain any worthwhile results, one thing was essential... Subject nodded at this point and interrupted: \"I know... keep quiet.\" I emphasized that this meant with everyone, including her family, her friends, her boss and her co-workers. Subject assured me that she could be relied upon.\n11. Contact Arrangements. Subject agreed to call me to set up a luncheon date after her next date with LOGINOV. We will meet at the entrance to the Pergola at the time and date specified. I gave her the 670 extension and asked that she use the name \"Mary\" when calling.\n\n12. There are clearly two essentials if Subject is to develop into a worthwhile asset. First she is going to have to come up with more interesting observations than simply that LOGINOV is smart. She may be able to do this by becoming a more diligent and careful observer\u2014which I think she is capable of\u2014or it may require an effort on her part to develop a closer relationship with LOGINOV. One possibility in the latter direction is to prevail upon her to become more intimate with LOGINOV than she now appears to be. On the basis of LICOZY-5's opinion that she probably sleeps around, this might be possible, although it is much too early to say. Second, Subject must prove cooperative. She strikes me as a very independent and strong-willed person, and there is no guarantee she won't change her mind or do only what she feels like doing. It is also possible that in a moment of reconsideration, she might confide in LICOZY-5, in which case her credibility would become tangled with his.\n\nRS\nRobert Steele\nSECRET\n\n17 March 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nathan L. Ferris, Legal Attach\u00e9\nFROM: Winston H. Scott\nSUBJECT: Unidentified Visitor to Soviet Embassy\n\n1. A sensitive, reliable source has reported that on 9 March 1967 a man who appeared to be an American stopped at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City to talk with Soviet Consul Valentin Sergeevich LOGINOV. The man did not enter the Soviet Embassy. He was driving what appeared to be a late model Buick Electra with Florida tags # 10-W-7776.\n\n2. A photograph of the above man will be furnished to your office when prints are available.\n\nTHIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.\n\nDistribution:\nOriginal - Addressee\n1 - 50-2-4/A\n1 - 50-8-10/11\n1 - Memo Chron\n1 - Flash pouch\n1 - P\n\nJonathan L. WEENING/frm\n17 March 1967\nRaymond PATUEL\nFrancis L. PATUEL, nee Smith.\n\nCitizenship deed, please\n\nRECORDED\n\nAttached\n\n15 Mar 67\n\nP. 11 7/12\nFrom Citizenship Office - 15 March 1957\n\nRamon PATUEL\n\nDate of Birth: 28 July 1905, Madrid, Spain\n\nDate of Naturalization - 11 April 1956, Supreme Court of N. Y. at Rochester, N.Y.\n\nNaturalization Certificate #7457155\n\nEmergency Address and Address: Mrs. Frances L. Patuel, wife, same add in Mex.\n\nLocal Address: Sierra Grande 907, Lomas, Mexico 10, D. F.\n\nAddress in U. S. - 23 River Meadow Drive, Rochester 23, N.Y.\n\nOccupation - Manager\n\nFull name of father, date and place of his birth: Enrique PATUEL,\n\nValencia, Spain Nationality - Spanish\n\nMother: Eulalia Sanchez de Molina Patuel, Madrid, Spain - Spanish\n\nName of Spouse: Frances L. Patuel, Madrid, Spain, 4 Dec. 1922 (US father) US Cit.\n\nDate and place of marriage - 18 March 1950\n\nWife native born\n\nDate of last arrival in country - 20 Feb. 1961\n\nPp #524029 issued 15 May 1957, Wash.\n\nNames of children, dates and places of birth:\n\nRaymond J. 13 February 1951, Rochester, N. Y.\n\nU.S. Residence since Natz. Residence outside U.S. since Natz.\n\n| From | To | Country | From | To |\n|------|----|---------|------|----|\n| 1956 | 1957 | Spain | 1957 | 1959 |\n| 1959 | 1961 | Mexico | 2-20-61 | Present |\n\nDate card initially typed - 1 March 1962\n\nAction taken:\n\n1 Mar 61 Appl for ppt & reg\n\n3 Mar 61 Ppt #2042590 iss valid to 3-2-64 reg. to same date. Wife included in reg only\n\n27 Feb 64 Ppt Z042990 iss 3 Mar 61 ren to full validity\n\n25 Feb 66 Issued Ppt Z522118 valid to 24 Feb 69, reg. Prev. ppt. can. & ret.\nFrances L. PATUEL  4 Dec. 1922, Madrid, Spain\n\nFather - XXXXX Austin Rodger Smith, Rochester, N. Y. 5 Aug. 1932  Cit: USA\n\nMother - Mercedes Semprun Smith, Valladolid, Spain\n\nFather native born\n\nDate of last arrival in country - 20 Feb 61\n\nPpt #524029 iss 15 May 57, Wash. (incl. in husband's ppt.)\n\nAction taken:\n\n3 Mar 61 - Ppt #2042588 iss valid to 3-2-64 reg. to same date\n\n27 Feb 64 Ppt #2042588 ren to full validity\n\n25 Feb 66 Issued Ppt #2522119 valid to 26 Feb 69, Reg. Prev. ppt. can. & ret.\n\nDate card initially typed - 1 Mar 62\n\nThere is also a card on the son, Raymond J. PATUEL, born 13 Feb 51, Rochester, N.Y.\n\nwith same info as above.\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: BESABER\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 7 March 1967\n\n1. Operational: Met BESABER at his hotel room in Del Paseo for breakfast. Meal lasted from 0800-0920. Next meet will be after Easter.\n\n2. Substance\n\na. BEKEEP: BEKEEP phoned BESABER on Friday, 3 March 1967 to invite himself, his wife and the RZADZINSKI couple down for the day on 5 March. They arrived on 5 March at about 1000, stayed until 1700.\n\nb. BESABER reported that Mrs. RZADZINSKA is three months pregnant (by her admission) and that he, BESABER, thinks that BEKEEP is the father. He cited the following as evidence:\n\n(1) The RZADZINSKIS admitted they they had been married for over five years, yet this is her first pregnancy.\n\n(2) Mr. RZADZINSKI was totally unattentive to Mrs. R. BESABER and his wife assume that after so many years of waiting for a child, Mr. R. should have shown more concern for and interest in his wife.\n\n(3) Likewise, Mr. R. was totally disinterested in the fact that he is about to become a father.\n\n(4) BEKEEP, on the other hand, showed concern for Mrs. R. when she went to sleep in the sun. Twice he suggested that Mr. R. wake her up so she would not get burned. He didn't.\n\n(5) Mrs. R. appeared interested in BEKEEP. When he went swimming Mrs. R followed, proceeded to jump on him and frolic in the water. Mrs. R. paid no attention at all.\n\n(6) Mrs. R. sat next to BEKEEP at lunch (on purpose), kept looking at BEKEEP lovingly.\n\n(7) BEKEEP, possibly embarrassed by all the attention Mrs. R. was showing him, made some very complimentary remarks about his wife. Mrs. BEKEEP, who apparently was completely oblivious to what BESABER and his wife thought was so obvious in the BEKEEP/Mrs. R. relationship, was obviously very pleased.\nbut surprised, to hear her husband speaking about her in such a complimentary way. She asked incredulously whether he really meant what he said and when BEWEEP reiterated with some embarrassment that he thought she was the best wife in the world, Mrs. BEWEEP, covered with confusion but happy said that this was the first time he had ever said such kind things about her, the first time she had been aware that he really did think she was a good wife.\n\n(8) BEWEEP seemed relaxed enough, but different. On several occasions when political matters came up, usually raised by Mr. R., he changed the subject, once asked Mr. R. almost rudely, \"Don't you have anything better than politics to talk about.\"\n\n(9) Mrs. BEWEEP said that the two couples had been in the habit of going off on weekends together. BESABER supposed that BEWEEP may have done the deed during one of their outings.\n\nc. In private conversation with BESABER, Mrs. BEWEEP asked if BESABER had heard from BESATON. When BESABER said he had not, Mrs. BEWEEP said that her husband had told her BESATON was in Colombia (SLINKARD had told BEWEEP this). She then went on to say that BESATON was the nicest man in the world. \"I don't know what he is, but he's the nicest man in the world.\" \"He introduced us to another American (obviously SLINKARD) whom we see often, but it's not the same.\"\n\nd. Mrs. BEWEEP, still alone with BESABER, was very complimentary towards the U. S. She said the U. S. was made for women, the merchandising, the packaging, the stores, etc. Moreover, the people are all nice.\n\ne. Joined by BEWEEP, Mrs. BEWEEP got off on the Russians. She explained that it was difficult to understand the Russians since she, as a Pole, belonging to the Western Cultural traditions, held so many different views about life in general. She was apparently particularly thinking of the sense of distrust in the Russian mentality. She said that the Russians here in the Embassy simply could not believe that the two daughters of the former Polish Ambassador, Jerzy GRUDZINSKI, had been permitted to stay on in Mexico after their WYNNX father's recall last year.\nSECRET\n\n-3-\n\nf. Mrs. BEWEEP told Mrs. BESABER that she was not teaching geography at the Embassy to the children of the officials.\n\ng. BEWEEP told BESABER that he thought he would remain in Mexico until the first few months of 1969, but certainly until after the Olympics of the fall of 1968.\n\nh. Tenon RZADZINSKI and wife - In addition to the information above noted regarding R. and his wife, the BESABERS picked up the following:\n\n(1) RZADZINSKI was previously stationed in Vietnam as a member of the ICC (interpreter). He speaks good English and his Spanish, although not as good, is understandable.\n\n(2) R. doesn't understand why the Americans are carrying out the war they way they are. Without in any way criticizing the American position, he did say that he found it unbelievable that they did not destroy the port of Haiphang.\n\n(3) R. had contact with Americans in Vietnam. He spent one month at the Danang air base, apparently enjoyed it.\n\n(4) R. did not get off on politics, possibly because BEWEEP apparently did not want to talk about such subjects.\n\n3. Comments\n\nWe have no information to substantiate the BESABERS supposition that BEWEEP is the father of Mrs. R's expected child. I told BESABER this. It may be true, but to have any operational significance, we would almost have to prove it.\n\n4. Plans\n\na. I asked BESABER to arrange a lunch with BEWEEP in the near future to try to see if there was anything more to the above supposition. (Lunch now set up for 4 April).\n\nb. Tentatively, BESABER will invite LOGINOV to Cuernavaca for 8 or 9 April to look at houses (for Sov Embassy retreat) and play tennis at Colonel Higgins (whom I will brief as soon as I can get hold of him).\n\nPhineas F. BLINKARD\n\nSECRET\nFebruary 28, 1967\n\nAnconsul VESACUL\n\nOCEAN SHIPMENTS: Communist Ships\n\nC-22A-50783; Veracruz L-33, 2/13/67, same subject\n\n1. EAST GERMAN SHIPS AT VESACUL.\n\nThe HEINRICH HEINE (11 photos enclosed) arrived as expected on February 15, (see referenced airmail, pgh. 1) direct from La Havre, and left for Havana February 21 in billet. The ship had planned to take a Canadian passenger (Alexander John LAMBERT, port 6, B-602224, issued Toronto, 12/13/66, age 35, occupation: 2nd class steward, Toronto 13), but he disappeared at the last minute. Blanchard planned to return to Mexico City from Cuba via the C.I. T.I., and then come back down to Veracruz to get his wife Mary (pa) who has to remain here. The Italian tourist cards of Mr. 6 yrs. Blanchard expired February 12, 1967. The local agent for the East German line stated that, recently, the honorary Consul of East Germany (a rival shipping agent) has been going aboard each East German ship to offer all possible assistance; on looking into this, said the agent, he discovered that East Germany's representatives throughout the world, wherever East Germany is not represented, have been ordered to act discreetly in representation of East German interests as well as East German interests.\n\n2. RUSSIAN SHIPS AT VERACRUZ.\n\nThe POSSIBLYS TAJUKISTANA (see referenced airmail, pgh. 2) sailed February 21, saying she was bound for Hamburg. The consular\n\nEnclosures:\n1. 11 photos of the HEINE\n2. 5 photos of the L. LOMONOSOV\n3. Crew lists of the L. LOMONOSOV, VITLUGILIS and KIYOVSK\n\nEMBASSY OF THE\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA\nMAR 01 1967\n\nRECD IN CRIF\nMEXICO, D.F.\nMEXICO\n\n200-4-79\nresearch vessel \"MIRIAD\" (3 photos enclosed) arrived February 24th, giving Cristobal as her last port, and is expected to leave late February 26th. On February 23rd, the merchant vessels \"VITLACAL\" and \"ILICOSK\" arrived in ballast from Havana, Cuba, and Habana, respectively. The former is to load an estimated 5,000 metric tons of corn and the latter an estimated 11,000. Gray lists of the three ships last mentioned are enclosed. Mexican authorities mounted a guard around the \"ILICOSK\" and refused to let anyone on or off. Soviet Consul and Third Secretary Valentin L. LOPATIN in town in connection with the visiting Russian ships, called the Consulate on February 27th, wanting to talk to the Consul, who was out of town, but showed no interest in talking to the Vice Consul. On February 23rd, a local shipping agent introduced Lopatin to the Vice Consul. Lopatin complained of the lack of hospitality shown to the Soviet scientific ship by Mexican authorities, comparing this with the significant reception the ship had received in San Francisco; he even asked if the American Consulate didn't have some relationship with Mexican immigration authorities, implying that we might be able to help them. Lopatin, who was very cordial, said he had been in Mexico City a year and a half and lived there with his family. He seemed about six feet tall, with short, reddish-blonde hair, and spoke fluent Spanish with Russian accent.\n\n2. COATLACALCO.\n\nNo Communist ships are known to have entered Coatlacalco harbor since those mentioned in page 3 of the referenced telegram. Further information is not yet available on those ships.\n\nBOOTH\nSECRET\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Contact with BESABER\n\nDATES OF MEETINGS: 23 and 28 February 1967\n\nA. Operational\n\n1. As arranged by phone CO met BESABER in latter's room at the Hotel Del Paseo, dates 23 and 28 February. Mrs. BESABER was present at the second meet. BESABER plans to be in Mexico City on 9 March and will call to arrange meet.\n\nB. Finances\n\n1. CO picked up BESABER's accounting for revolving fund. I'll reimburse him at next meet.\n\nC. Substance\n\n1. Soviets - At about 1000 on 18 February Vladimir Ivanovich SHPAKEVICH (P-8167) phoned BESABER from Cuernavaca. BESABER had never met him before. S explained he friend of Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (P-11712), that I unable to make it because some people had arrived in town. S showed interest in buying some of BESABER's products, therefore BESABER asked him to come to factory. S arrived with wife and young girl who works in the Embassy (18-19 years old, tall, good figure, dark brown hair, spoke Spanish, she wore kerchief) - this probably Tatyana MARKINA (P-12945).\n\n2. S brought almost 2000 pesos worth of stuff including two large screens. BESABER opines that this was not personal purchase, but rather either for the Embassy or operational expense deal. S also insisted that purchases be delivered to Embassy, not his house.\n\n3. S invited BESABER and wife to Army Day reception at the Soviet Embassy (28 Feb 1967), saying that he had forgotten to bring written invitation but that it would be at the gate of the Embassy (BESABER was reluctant to go and I thought it better for him to not appear overly eager so he did not go.)\n\n4. Before leaving (they stayed about 45 minutes) S told BESABER that he would probably come to Cuernavaca the following day, Sunday about noon. (he didn't.)\n\nFILE: P-8777 P-8167 P-11712 P-5163 P-12019 P-885\nP-9772\n\nSECRET\n5. After S, XXX wife and M had left BESABER picked up a\ngirl and drove to the Arosena (phonetic) hotel in downtown\nCuernavaca. Sitting in the garden of the hotel at about 1300\nhe spotted S (with his shirt off) sitting at another table\nconversing with a man who looked Russian, apparent age 25, thin,\nwavy dark brown hair. S's wife also present, but M not. BESABER\nleft after about 15 minutes without talking to S although S must\nhave seen him.\n\n6. Per CO instructions BESABER phoned L on 24 February to\napologize for not making it to the reception. During this\nconversation (LIENVOY intercepted) L said he would come to\nBESABER's house for lunch on Saturday, 25 February with about\nfive other people. He showed up at about 1545, stayed until about\n1830 with:\n\nAleksandr Mikhaylovich BROVKN (P-829) and wife\nBoris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH (P-9772) and wife\nMrs. Pavel YATSKOV (P-885)\nMrs. LOGINOV (P-11712)\n8 assorted children of above.\n\n7. They arrived in two cars, BROVKN driving a 2-year old\nlight blue Ford Falcon, LOGINOV a blue-gray Chevrolet, license\nplates 19-DA. (BESABER may be color blind - our records show\nboth cars as being green.)\n\n8. The conversation was characterized by a lot of\npropaganda on BROVKN's and LOGINOV's part. Although Vietnam was\nnot mentioned, L boasted several times that the Soviets would\nget to the moon first, complained about the Kennedy murder\nscandal, and generally spoke in an anti-American vein. BESABER\nand his wife tried to laugh them out of this theme, but with little\nsuccess.\n\n9. At one point BESABER mentioned an article he had recently\nread in Business Week about the Soviet car industry. When he\ntold LOGINOV that the article purported to be based on CIA\ninformation, L would not leave him alone until he found the\narticle and gave it to him.\n\n10. LOGINOV was obviously the superior of the three men.\nNeither MALAKHOVICH nor his wife said a word. BROVKN, after a\nfew drinks (but not drunk) started moaning about the problems\nof life, mentioned that the only thing that kept him going was his\ngood wife and children. At this point LOGINOV walked up behind\nBROVKN's chair, practically lifted BROVKN, chair and all, and\nsaid, \"We must go.\"\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n11. As far as the BESABERS could make out the only purpose of the visit (other than to get a free meal) was to invite the BESABERS to come to the Embassy to see Soviet films. Not knowing how he should react BESABER was non-committal, although he couldn't resist asking BROVINK if they had any Westerns in color. (I told BESABER he should not go to movies and if the subject came up again to tell the Soves that while he liked them as people, he didn't want to hear their propaganda either orally or from the sound track of some lousy movie).\n\n12. BESABER is less impressed by LOGINOV's intelligence than heretofore. Between L's and B's heavy-handed propagandizing (especially in the capitalistic \"ambiente\" of the BESABERS) BESABER was less than impressed with their tact.\n\n13. Mrs. BESABER reported that of the three women Mrs. YATSKOV was by far the most presentable. She learned that the YATSKOV's were on their second tour in Mexico, that they liked Mexico (Mrs. BESABER is Mexican). Mrs. BROVINK related that they had one daughter (age 14) in Moscow besides the two children with them in Mexico.\n\n14. Plans for future get-togethers include only LOGINOV. Mrs. BESABER will look for some housing for the Soves in Cuernavaca; BESABER when she has found something, they'll invite LOGINOV down to have a look at them. There is also the possibility of tennis, although both BESABERS are loathe to take any Soves to Mrs. BESABER's tennis club, practically all the members of which are Americans. I agree.\n\n15. The BESABERS proposed and I second the motion that I contact Laurence Higgins, a long-time station contact and personal friend of the BESABERS and tell them that the BESABERS are cultivating Soves in our behalf, ask him to let BESABERS bring LOGINOV, XM and possibly others to Higgins' court in Cuernavaca.\n\n16. Attached are signatures of the Soves who visited BESABER.\n\n17. Raul Morales Montoya - At 23 Feb meet BESABER handed over the attached postcard from RMH, dated 14 Feb from Colima. At the 28 Feb meet BESABER reported that RMH had phoned him from Colima on 24 Feb, reporting among other things that he would be in Colima for another month or so. He said he was working in the office of Secretaria Particular of the Governor of Colima (tel: 2-04-11) and staying at the Hotel Costeno (tel: 2-00-35).\n\nPhineas F. SLINKARD\n\nSECRET\n\n[Signature]\nOn Saturday 28 I went to a party at the house of the Greek Consul General Leander Vourvoulia, and I saw there Vladimir Loguinov engaged in a heated discussion with an American consul whose name is Sherry. Sherry was arguing that there were a lot of Chinese in North Viet Nam, and Loguinov was saying that it was a pity that such a big nation as the US should be fighting an small and poor nation like Viet Nam.\n\nI had a talk with Loguinov, who I think now is in charge of consular affairs and he told me that he thought that negotiations for the cultural agreement with Mexico were still going on, but that those who had been awarded the fellowships had already gone. But according to what he said there were quite a few more than ten.\n\nLoguinov was with his wife and talking about the Bolshoi ballet he told me that I should have rang him up and he would have taken us, me and my wife, to see the ballet and to see the dancers behind the stage. He said that the ballet was coming to Canada for the fair and probably would come again to Mexico.\n\nThe Russians will give a party for the consulate, film and drinks sometime during February.\n\nLoguinov asked me if I thought that some consulate would not show up at the Russian embassy as they did when they were invited by the Cubans. I told him that the position was entirely different because most countries had diplomatic and consular relations with the USSR.\nA las 11:14 hs. lleg\u00f3 al Club una mujer de poco m\u00e1s de 50 a\u00f1os, misma que pas\u00f3 al interior del recibidor en el cual tuvo contacto con LXXI, dicha mujer se fue a las 12:42 hs. fotos en Y-2174 (nocar)\n\nI thought this might be\n\nJohanna RAKOFF de MARCHAND,\n\nbut she must be older.\n\n3 Jan 67\n\nP-11712\nSECRET\n\n7 March 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nathan L. Ferris, Legal Attach\u00e9\nFROM: Winston M. Scott\nSUBJECT: Dr. R. W. YUDD\n\n1. Reference is made to your memorandum on Subject dated 27 February 1967.\n\n2. This office has photographs of three American-looking people who visited the Soviet Embassy from 1320 to 1336 hours on 26 January 1967, and who are probably identical with Subject, his wife and associate, Clyde WHITWELL. They were driving a Tourism car from Zacatecas, license plates 8133-H.\n\n3. It is believed that the Soviet who talked to Subject was the Consul, Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV.\n\nTHIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.\n\n# 11547\n\nDistribution:\nOriginal - Addresssee\n1 - 50-2-4/A\n1 - 50-8-10/11\n1 - P-11712\n1 - Memo Chron\n2 - Wash pouch (HWMA-31524, 7 March 1967)\nJonathan L. WEENING/fkm\n7 March 1967\nrecently rejoined RAY'S firm after previously leaving it and working for another firm in Mexico City. (The man is undoubtedly John G. PAGE, who is listed in the 1966-67 Anglo-American Directory as Sales Manager for Tele-Revista, S.A. The 1961-62 Anglo lists a John G. PAGE as being with Richard K. TONKINS & Assoc.--i.e., clearly the predecessor of \"TONKINS, RAY, MARTEL,\".) According to Subject, Mrs. PAGE's mother is Dr. Anita BR\u00dcNNER, an American and the editor of \"Mexico This Month.\" Mr. PAGE looks to be 35-40 years old and his wife about 30. PAGE is half Jewish and one of his parents was born in Russia. PAGE consequently speaks some Russian and spoke a little with KUCHEROV. LINOBBIN-1 saw RAY a few days after the film showing, and RAY mentioned that PAGE had told him that KUCHEROV had made a definite effort to make friends with him (PAGE), but that he (PAGE) had no interest in making friends with Communists.\n\n4. As it turned out, Gulliver's Travels wasn't shown after all, as the film turned out to be in very poor condition and kept breaking when run on the projector. In its place, the Soviets showed a Soviet film about a poor young woman in 19th or early 20th century Russia who marries a wealthy old man and is corrupted by her new found riches. The kids and everyone else were disappointed, but Subject found some consolation in the fact that the flick at least was clean.\n\n5. 15 February. On this date Subject and LINOBBIN-1 attended an evening reception at the Indian Embassy at the invitation of their friend K.D. FARASHAR, the Indian Consul. LOGINOV and SOKOLOV were also there, both without wives. Subject at first\nand unfortunately really didn't know of any. LOGINOV said that he probably really ought to take English lessons from a Britisher. He added that he had once taken a few lessons from a \"girl from Texas,\" but he had had to stop because of her \"Texas accent.\"\n\nLOGINOV finally said that well, look, he was having \"a little party\" the next evening and would like Subject and her husband (whom he eventually met in the course of the evening) to attend, as he would like to have her become acquainted with the Soviet Embassy, too (i.e., in addition to the Indian Embassy). LOGINOV added that perhaps she could even put something in THE NEWS about the affair. Subject accepted the invitation, although without LIMONIN-I, who was about to leave for the States, and said she'd see if she could get a photographer to the Embassy.\n\n6. 16 February. On this date Subject attended the Consular Corps gathering at the Soviet Embassy. She went with the FARASHARS. LOGINOV was the first Soviet to greet her, but within a few moments PRIKHODKO and KUCHEROV came hustling up. Subject said that LOGINOV seemed genuinely surprised that his colleagues already knew her, but he did not ask for an explanation of how. On their parts, PRIKHODKO and KUCHEROV seemed equally surprised, but also avoided asking any questions. In the course of the evening, Subject talked with PRIKHODKO, KUCHEROV, DOLGOV, Mrs. PRIKHODKO, and Mrs. SOKOLOV. LOGINOV made no effort to search her out, and she did not talk with him again until leaving, at which time she thanked him for the invitation and apologized that the NEWS photographer she had asked to come to the Embassy had not shown up. However, she said she'd try to put something in \"Around the Town.\"\ngone and spend and/or make some time with her. She said she actually felt sorry for KUCHINOV, because he just wasn't cut out for the role and she thought he probably dreaded it.\n\n8. 23 February. On this date Subject attended the Soviet Army Day reception at the Soviet Embassy. She went with Pearl GONZALEZ and an American named Bill SOLENIK, whom Pearl brought along as her escort. (KUCHINOV left an invitation for Pearl with Subject on 17 February.) According to Subject, SOLENIK is about 35 and is in \"publicity\" work here. (According to the A-A Directory, William A. SOLENIK is an executive in the International Department of Walter Thompson de Mexico.) Subject did not notice any other Americans at the reception. She talked with PRIKHODKO, Mrs. PRIKHODKO, KUCHINOV, DOLGOV, and, briefly, LOGINOV. DOLGOV said he had been with PRAVDA for six years. Subject had put a blurb about the 16 February Consular function in THE NEWS on 19 February and brought along a clipping for LOGINOV. LOGINOV said he hadn't seen it, seemed pleased, and thanked her. He then asked if she were going on the Consular Corps tour of the Mexican Home Show on 3 March. Well, no, Subject replied, why would she be, she wasn't a consul or married to one, and consequently hadn't been invited. LOGINOV replied that he thought she should go and therefore he was making her an honorary Soviet consul. Subject said that was fine with her and she'd see him at the Home Show. (I told Subject on 28 February to be careful with LOGINOV, because he was an experienced KGB officer and one of the most able men in the Soviet Embassy. This seemed to delight as much as concern Subject.)\n9. March. Subject did not at first see LOGPOV on the Home Show tour, but mid-way through the tour she felt a tap on her shoulder, turned and saw LOGPOV. They then walked along together for the last 25 minutes of or so of the tour. Subject said that nothing of interest was said and they parted without any specific mention of getting together again. Subject said LOGPOV spent most of the time criticizing the U.S. on everything from its foreign policy to its treatment of the American Indian.\n\n10. Pearl GONZALEZ. Subject told me on 8 March that Pearl had just received permission from the Cuban Government to visit Cuba as a journalist. Subject said U.S. foreign correspondents in Mexico had applied for permission to visit Cuba many times in the past, but had all been turned down. Pearl and Harold JONES of the Copley News Service, according to Subject, were the two most recent American applicants. JONES, according to Subject, was turned down. Subject said she thought Pearl was probably given permission because the Cubans believe they can lead her around by the hand and get some useful publicity out of her. Subject noted that Pearl believes Castro has done a lot of good for Cuba and that he has been unfairly treated by the U.S. press. Moreover, Subject observed, Pearl is by no means a full-fledged or experienced newspaper woman, as her only experience consists of writing society articles in THE NEWS for the last year. Subject said Pearl planned to visit the American Embassy on 8 March in order to get permission from the State Department to make the trip.\n\n11. Antonio HALIK. I asked Subject if she knew HALIK, who according to the Foreign Correspondents' Assoc. handbook, is a\nSECRET\n\n28 February 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nathan L. Ferris, Legal Attache\nFROM: Winston M. Scott\nSUBJECT: Travel of Soviets\n\n1. A sensitive, reliable source has reported that Soviet Minister Boris Aleksandrovich KAZANTSEV went to Veracruz on 25 February 1967, and that Soviet Consul Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV and Soviet Commercial Counselor Viktor Mikhailovich IVANOV planned to go on 26 February 1967 in order to attend to three Soviet ships there in port. It has also been reported that Soviet Cultural Attache Svyatoslav Fedorovich KUZNETSOV planned to be in Queretaro on 27 February 1967 to attend a ceremony at the university there.\n\n2. Any information available to your office on the activities of these Soviets in Veracruz and Queretaro would be appreciated.\n\nTHIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.\n\n# 11513\n\nDistribution:\nOriginal - Addresses\n1 - 50-2-4/A\n1 - P-11712\n1 - P-1612\n1 - P-8102\n1 - P-880\n1 - Memo Chron\n\nJonathan L. WEENING/fkm\n28 February 1967\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOZY-3\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 22 February 1967\n\n1. I had breakfast with Subject at the Hotel Del Paseo from 0900 to 1000 on 22 February 1967. Next meeting is at the same place at 0900 on 8 March 1967.\n\n2. Subject reported that he had had lunch with LOGINOV as planned. LOGINOV brought up the following topics:\n\n   a. LOGINOV brought up the Ramparts article about CIA. Subject hadn't read or heard of it. LOGINOV then said this proved that CIA was very active and said they were active in Mexico. He again asked Subject if he had any friends at the American Embassy. Subject for the nth time told LOGINOV that he hadn't been in the American Embassy and that an office boy takes care of visas, etc. at the Embassy.\n\n   b. LOGINOV then said that he was going to explain to Subject the line of the CC of the CP USSR on China. Then followed an harangue against the Chinese which Subject stated contained nothing that hadn't been in the newspapers.\n\n   c. LOGINOV said that he has a Mexican girl whom he didn't identify and asked if Subject would give her a job or find her a job. Subject asked about her qualifications, English, typing, etc. LOGINOV answered that he didn't know. Subject said to send her around and he would see. To date she has not appeared. (COMMENT: Subject said he has no intention of hiring her, if she comes, but thought we would be interested in her identify. I told him to find out as much about her as possible. However since LOGINOV didn't say what kind of a job she wanted or what she could do, I will be surprised if she comes.)\n\n   d. LOGINOV went into some detail explaining to Subject about the party he was giving at the Soviet Embassy on 16 February, for the Consular Corps. He then invited Subject.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n-2-\n\n6. LOGINOV said that Aeroflot service would be inaugurated between New York and Moscow in May. Once it is instituted local Soviets will fly to New York and catch Aeroflot there. Subject asked about U.S. visas which the Soviets have always complained about in the past. LOGINOV said that the Soviets will be travelling from Mexico to New York on Air France and Air France has agreed to handle the matter of transit visas with the U.S. Embassy. LOGINOV added that the local Soviets are looking forward to the stop off in New York which is much more interesting than Montreal. (COMMENT: If this works out we will have good advance notice of Soviet travel from Mexico and excellent passport photos).\n\n3. Subject went to the party on 16 February 1967 with his secretary and his friend, Sinai Rome, First Secretary and Consul at the Israeli Embassy. He saw PRIKHODKO briefly and PRIKHODKO's wife attached herself to him and took care of him for the evening. He noted that YATSKOV wasn't at the party.\n\n4. Rome introduced Subject to Jan JAKOWIEC. The minute JAKOWIEC heard Subject's name, he asked if he were from Mundus Tours. They then conversed in Polish. JAKOWIEC told Subject that the Polish delegation to the Olympics will come on the Batory and that the Poles are building a ship twice the size of the Batory which will be put on the Poland-New York City run next year. JAKOWIEC suggested that they get together for lunch and Subject agreed. JAKOWIEC said he would call Subject in about a week. Subject remarked that he is a sharp guy and speaks very good Russian. I told Subject that JAKOWIEC is the UB resident and instructed him not to go beyond a social relationship in any manner. Subject agreed.\n\n5. Subject still has not heard anything on the ZARUDOWSKIY-ECHAVARRIA dinner.\n\n6. Subject is travelling to Los Angeles on business for two days on 24 February. On 27 April he will go to Israel for 10 days to conduct a group of Mexicans who are going to the opening of the Mexican Pavilion at a university which was paid for by Mexican Jews.\n\n7. Per LIENNOY, NIKIFOROV called Subject on 20 February 1967 and made an appointment to come to Subject's office at 1100 on 21 February. Subject did not mention this to me. I will bring up the Subject of NIKIFOROV in an innocuous way at the next meeting.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nSECRET\n(d) LOGINOV -- Subject has frequently seen LOGINOV in the first office off the Reception Room. LOGINOV has received the majority of the 8-10 visitors who have come into the Reception Room while Subject has been there during the last year.\n\n(e) STRIZHOV -- Subject has frequently seen STRIZHOV jockeying cars around. He has also seen STRIZHOV go in and out of the gatehouse on numerous occasions.\n\n(f) SILNIKOV -- Up to several months ago, SILNIKOV used to occasionally be on guard duty when Subject entered and exited the Embassy. He has also seen him jockeying cars around.\n\n(g) SOLOMATIN -- Since Subject has been holding afternoon classes at the Embassy (since mid-January 1967), he has seen SOLOMATIN on guard duty every Tuesday and Thursday afternoon. He saw SOLOMATIN on duty only once in a while before this.\n\n(h) TUCHININ -- Subject has seen TUCHININ in the second office of the Reception Room two or three times. He has never seen him receive a visitor.\n\n(i) YATSKOV -- Subject has frequently seen YATSKOV in both the first and second offices off the Reception Room. He has seen YATSKOV receive visitors on a couple of occasions. YATSKOV has been on duty present with about half the frequency as LOGINOV.\n\n(j) ZAKHAROV -- ZAKHAROV used to be frequently on duty in the morning.\n\n3. Subject conducted 13 classes at the Soviet Embassy during the reporting period.\n\n17 January\n\n1545-1630 -- KAZANTSEV suggested that Subject give whether or not he planned to resume classes. KAZANTSEV implied he had no idea what MIKHTIN's plans\nNOTAS.\n\nViernes 17\n\nA las 12:42 Hs. entr\u00f3 al Club por la reja principal, una mujer extranjera (al parecer norteamericana) afuera de la porter\u00eda habl\u00f3 un momento con SOLO y pas\u00f3 al interior del Recibidor en el cual a las 12:50 Hs. tuvo contacto con LOO, se fue del Club a las 13:03 Hs.\n\nLa mujer mencionada vest\u00eda un traje de 2 piezas de color azul claro, era rubia, alta y delgada, usa lentes (cristales transparentes).\nLILY R. C. 17 Dec 1967\nin 1241 m, and 1303 m.\nCuerpo Consular en M\u00e9xico\nM\u00e9xico, D.F.\n\nSe\u00f1or(a)\n\n[Nombre]\n\n[Direcci\u00f3n]\n\n[Fecha]\nFiesta T\u00edpica Griega. Hemos recibido numerosas felicitaciones por la fiesta ofrecida por el Hon. Consul General de Grecia y Pres. del Cuerpo Consular, en honor de los miembros de esta organizaci\u00f3n que ha sido atendida por m\u00e1s de cien personas. Desde temprano, el d\u00eda 28 de enero, la residencia de nuestro Presidente en Paseo de la Reforma No. 2485, Lomas, lugar de tan agradable reuni\u00f3n, ha sido colmada de gente que ha venido a gozar de los pl\u00e1tanos griegos y de los bailes y m\u00fasica t\u00edpica de este pa\u00eds hermano que fueron presentados por un grupo de j\u00f3venes del Club Juvenil Hellenico-Mexicano de esta ciudad. Hubo derroche de alegr\u00eda y buen humor, se sirvieron \"bourekas\", \"kolokithia\", \"kolokithia\", \"spanakopita\", \"kourabiedes\" y varias otras especialidades griegas y se sirvi\u00f3 \"ouzo\", \"Metaxa brandy\" y otras bebidas internacionales para el deleite de los presentes entre los cuales estaban el Sr. Director General del Servicio Consular Exmo. Sr. Luis Alva Cejudo y su distinguida se\u00f1ora, y al Sr. Sub-Director del mismo servicio Consular Lic. Ra\u00fal Valenzuela y se\u00f1ora, adem\u00e1s de numerosos Consules con sus consortes y Agregados y Secretarios de las Embajadas Extranjeras en este pa\u00eds. La casa y jard\u00edn del Presidente se\u00f1or Vourvoulis, debidamente iluminados para esta ocasi\u00f3n, presentaban un panorama muy bello, as\u00ed como las caras alegres y felices de sus invitados que con su entusiasmo y alegr\u00eda contribuyeron al \u00e9xito de esta reuni\u00f3n.\n\nFiesta T\u00edpica Russa. Nuestro Honorable Colega Don Valent\u00edn Longinov, Secretario de la Embajada de la U.R.S.S., nos informa que est\u00e1 organizando una fiesta t\u00edpica Russa para el d\u00eda 15 de febrero pr\u00f3ximo, de las 19 a las 21 horas, en la cual tendremos la oportunidad de admirar los conocidos bailes y bebidas de origen Ruso. Se est\u00e1 preparando un nutritivo programa en esta ocasi\u00f3n y esperamos que un gran n\u00famero de nuestros asociados y sus se\u00f1oras podr\u00e1n asistir a la invitaci\u00f3n del Colega Longinov, que ser\u00e1 recibida por ellos alegremente. Danos las gracias de antemano a nuestro querido colega Longinov por su gentileza e inter\u00e9s en la organizaci\u00f3n de este acto que seguramente ser\u00e1 uno de los m\u00e1s interesantes de la temporada.\nVisita a la Planta General. Debido a nuestro programa de actividades en el mes de febrero, esta visita a la muy importante f\u00e1brica de L\u00edneas \"San Agust\u00edn\", se ha nuevamente aplazado hasta el 17 del pr\u00f3ximo mes, d\u00eda en que esperamos ser\u00e1 posible que un mayor n\u00famero de C\u00f3nsules podr\u00e1 hacer honor a la invitaci\u00f3n que nos ha extendido la Direcci\u00f3n de esta Empresa. La visita ser\u00e1 con se\u00f1ores y no ser\u00e1 servido un almuerzo amigable por los anfitriones.\n\nQuinta Trimestral 1967. Los recibos para el primer trimestre de este a\u00f1o, valor $150.00, no est\u00e1n presentados para su cobro. En caso de que nuestro cobrador no le encuentre en su despacho, le rogamos se dirija a la Secretar\u00eda y que le entregue un cheque por este valor, o enviarlo al Sr. Tesorero Honorable Francisco Barcel\u00f3, Calle de M\u00e9xico, cuya direcci\u00f3n es Paseo de la Reforma No. 156, 160, Piso, M\u00e9xico D.F., Mil Gracias.\nII CONVENCI\u00d3N CONSULAR INTERAMERICANA (Abril 11 - 12 en Panam\u00e1, Rep. Panam\u00e1)\n\nDistinguido Colega, Honorable Emil\u00edn Arellano, Consej General de \u2014\nPanam\u00e1 en M\u00e9xico, ha recibido una comunicaci\u00f3n del del Honorable Sr. Am-\nor\u00edn M. C\u00e1rdenas, Consej de Vinculaci\u00f3n en Col\u00f3n, Panam\u00e1, quien a la vez es\nPresidente del Comit\u00e9 Organizador de la IV Convenci\u00f3n Consular Interamericana,\ninvitando a los miembros de nuestro Cuerpo a estar presentes en \u00e9sa\nConvenci\u00f3n Consular Interamericana que tendr\u00e1 lugar en la ciudad de \u2014\nPanam\u00e1 los d\u00edas 11 al 15 de abril pr\u00f3ximo.\n\nSe ha preparado un interesante programa que abarca adem\u00e1s de las re-\nuniones oficiales, actos culturales y sociales en este hermoso pa\u00eds \u2014\nPanam\u00e1, de manera que esperamos poder informar al Sr. Presidente del Comit\u00e9 \u2014\nOrganizador que un buen n\u00famero de nuestros asociados y sus dignos esto \u2014\nnos podr\u00e1 asistir a este evento.\n\nSer\u00e1n tratados varios temas de gran inter\u00e9s y se sugiere que cada uno de\nnosotros Consules acuda al estudio de \u00e9sta Directiva, la presente o po-\nner\u00eda que desea presentar, sobre temas de inter\u00e9s com\u00fan. Favor de indi-\ncarlos a la vez al Estado y su se\u00f1ora en a asistir, para hacer las reser-\nvaciones del caso.\n\nOportunamente enviamos a cada uno de los miembros de \u00e9ste Cuerpo del \u2014\nCabo de Panam\u00e1 y del Hotel. La cuota del registro se ha fijado en \u2014\n$25.00, Moneda Americana, por persona (la se\u00f1ora no paga). Hijos menores \u2014\ncon una cuota de $10.00 M.A. Hijos y personas mayores a raz\u00f3n de $25.00 \u2014\nM.A., cada uno.\n\nPor dirigir cualquier pregunta sobre el anterior al escrito (Tel. \u2014\n25-70-12) o al Sr. Rafael Panam\u00e1, (Tel. 46-30-80), quien ha sido nombrado\nSecretario para \u00e9sta Convenci\u00f3n.\n\nLeander P. Vourvoulis\nPresidente.\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOZY-5\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 15 February 1967\n\n1. I met and had breakfast with Subject at the Hotel Del Paseo from 0900 to 0950 on 15 February 1967. The next meeting is at the Del Paseo on 22 February at 0830.\n\n2. Subject reported that after a hiatus of no contact with any Soviet since the end of December, LOGINOV called him on 13 February and asked him for lunch on the 14th. Subject was busy on the 14th but agreed to meet him on the 15th at the Cafe Escla, near Subject's place of work. Subject chose a cafe rather than a restaurant in order to keep the meeting brief. He assured me that, other than being pleasant, he wouldn't accept any assignments or requests for information.\n\n3. Subject said that the private dinner for influential Jews to talk to ECHEVARRIA at Jacobo ZABLUDOWSKI's house had not taken place. Subject will check with ZABLUDOWSKI. He said he also intends to make a courtesy call on ECHEVARRIA soon since he is a very influential man, may become President and it wouldn't harm Subject to keep his ear in.\n\n4. Subject heard from Pedro Ferriz, a partner of ZABLUDOWSKI on TV, that USIA in Mexico had payed for the TV transmission time of the recent KOSYGIN interview from London. Asked why, Ferriz answered that USIA wanted the Mexican public to know the Soviet position on Vietnam and China.\n\n5. Subject reported that the Air France inaugural flight to Red China had been cancelled due to the situation in China. I told Subject that Headquarters had expressed no interest in any case.\n\n6. I asked Subject for the details on being representative for LUXINSHE, the Red Chinese equivalent of Intourist. He said that in 1960 he attended the American Society of Travel Agents convention in Honolulu. On the way back he took a tour of the FE and NE with a group of travel agents. In Hong Kong the Hong Kong Tourist Board had a cocktail party for them. A representative of LUXINSHE was at the party and invited the group for lunch. At this lunch he offered to make them agents for his company. Everybody signed up since there was no contract involved; they were just appointed. Since then he has been on\ntheir mailing list. He never has processed a traveller to China. He thinks that Cooks is also an agent but is not sure.\n\n7. Subject said he is processing several people as tourists to the USSR in the spring and summer. No visas have been issued yet. He promised me thermofax copies of all visas.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\nSECRET\n\n30 January 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Cocktail Party with Official Bloc Representatives\n\n1. At a party given by the local head of the Consular Corps Association on 28 June, the undersigned met and again chatted with Valentin S. LOGINOV of the Soviet Embassy. He also met for the first time Jan Jakowiec of the Polish Embassy who was introduced to undersigned by LOGINOV.\n\n2. As usual LOGINOV spent most of the time conversing with undersigned provoking him on a number of issues. The undersigned answered, making a few similar comments about the Chinese Civil War. When LOGINOV mentioned Vietnam, undersigned felt it would be nice if the Soviets helped the U.S. to bring peace to that area so they could concentrate more on the Chinese Communist danger. At one point in the conversation undersigned jokingly asked LOGINOV if there were Soviet nationals in North Vietnam. The latter said, \"sure, we have many advisors there.\" The undersigned said, \"no, what he meant was behind guns or in the seats of airplanes.\" LOGINOV said absolutely not. It also seems that LOGINOV has been keeping track of the people he sees undersigned talking with at cocktail parties. For example, LOGINOV was curious to know if undersigned has seen \"his Haitian friend.\" Undersigned asked which one - the black one or the white one. LOGINOV said the white one, referring to the Haitian Vice Consul whom undersigned occasionally talks to. Undersigned said he had seen the Haitian at the Haitian National Day about a month ago but noted that the only Soviet present at that party was ANDREYEV, not LOGINOV. The latter, incidentally, corners the Haitians anytime he has a chance to, although he officially poo-poo's the Haitian regime. LOGINOV once more asked undersigned when he would come play tennis with him (this is about the fourth or fifth time). Undersigned told him he would do so after he gets invited by LOGINOV as the latter has often promised to do. One of the topics that LOGINOV mentioned was the Protection Section of the Embassy. \"Protection against whom?\" he asked. The undersigned gave him the usual lowdown on the number of tourists to Mexico and their problems. LOGINOV must have been interested in the section as he mentioned that a U.S. Vice-Consul working in that section whom he had met recently will be transferring to another post.\n\nFILES: P-11712 P-9097\n\nSECRET\n3. JAKOWIEC appears to be a man who likes to talk. His Spanish is quasi bi-lingual and JAKOWIEC says, by the way, that he learned it in Brazil. His wife is a plump, very Polish-looking woman. Her initial conversation was to laugh at some of the exchanges between LOGINOV and the undersigned. Both Mr. and Mrs. JAKOWIEC appear to speak fluent Russian. At one point in the conversation undersigned mentioned there is hardly a Pole in Poland who does not have a relative in the United States; JAKOWIEC agreed and commented that while the Poles are close to Americans in many things they are not so pleased at other things that the U. S. does. Undersigned deferred the discussion of this point for another meeting. As many of the Consular Corp members know that undersigned served many years in Vietnam, the latter felt that he should not hide this fact to the official bloc representatives as they would find out about it anyway. This came out for the first time on the occasion of this cocktail party when JAKOWIEC somehow mentioned Vietnam and the efforts of the Polish members of the Armistice Commission there. The undersigned, who has known a number of these people quite well, told JAKOWIEC that they speak French better than Polish as they were sons of Polish emigrants to France who returned to Poland after Gomulka took power. When JAKOWIEC started to imply that this indicated how wonderful things were in Poland, undersigned pointed out that the parents of the returnees, many of whom worked under very difficult conditions in France in the coal mines, preferred the hard work to the chance of working in Communist Poland.\n\n4. The next cocktail party held by the Consular Assn. will probably be held at the Soviet Embassy. The President of the Association told undersigned that LOGINOV had asked him for his agreement to hold the next party at his Embassy. A large attendance of official bloc representatives can therefore be expected at the next get-together.\n\nFrancis Sherry\nSUBJECT: Progress Report/LICU-5 (1 November 1966 - 15 January 1967)\n\nREFERENCE: H-1430/2, 1 December 1966\n\n1. The last Progress Report (see Reference) reported developments in the situation through 31 October 1966, but not included were Subject's activities at the 1967 Conference in London to which Subject traveled on 22 October 1966. This report will be presented later.\n\n2. Contacts\n\nA. Subject and KGB Case Officers\n\nApart from Subject's frequent visits in Moscow during October 1966, no former KGB case officer in Moscow, City Nachtpolizei, Subject visited his home in London for a few minutes. On 9 December, KGB case officer, called Subject down to the street outside Subject's office to present him with a KGB booklet. On 19 December, Subject visited Subject's office and spent no more than half an hour there. On 20 and 21 December, Subject was paid a brief visit by his KGB officer, KGB officer (possibly a candidate for resident) (201-120123) at Majdanek station.\n\nB. Subject and KGB City Station Case Officer\n\nIn the two months since Subject's return from Europe in mid-November, C/O, Nachtpolizei, has seen Subject six times for an average of one hour each time.\n\nThe C/O met Subject at his office on 22 November for two hours.\n\nIn December, the C/O met Subject three times, on 8 December at his office for almost two hours, on 12 December at the Hotel Majdanek for a half-hour, and on 22 December at Subject's office for an hour.\n\nOn 2 January, the C/O and his wife took Subject to the city for dinner at the Belgrade Room of the Hotel Continental, then for a former visit to Subject's home. On 12 January, the C/O met Subject at the latter's office for one hour.\n\n3. Operational Implications\n\nA. Subject/KGB\n\nSubject arrived in Moscow on 22 October 1966 to attend the INTERPOL conference.\nto which travel agents on a world-wide basis had been invited. On the 2nd, second,\nJewish holiday, the Kechiporanko, Subject's former Soviet C/O in London, came to\nvisit him at the Hotel National. Subject deliberately kept his son at his side\nso that Kechiporanko would find it difficult to have private words with him.\nHowever, Kechiporanko came to visit Subject every day thereafter until Subject's\ndeparture. Kechiporanko brought gifts of records, records, etc. Then Kechiporanko\nfound the opportunity the first thing he told Subject was that he heard Subject had been a\n\"hero\" and had been difficult in London. Subject, in his half-serious manner,\nprotested to the idea that he was a rebel and told Kechiporanko earnestly that he\ndidn't have the time, effort or inclination to indulge in the cooperation that was\nexpected of him. He gave Kechiporanko the old line about friends \"back in Russia\"\nbut that he couldn't and wouldn't put out the old effort. Kechiporanko said that\nthis was the best, because he had wanted to present Subject to his chief and now there\nwas no point to the Subject shrugged this off. Kechiporanko asked Subject if he\nwould be willing to use his office as a letter-drop. Subject said, reluctantly,\nthat he could not use a letter-drop since agents writing to his firm and to him\nwould then know of Subject's connection with the Soviets and he would then be\nexposed. For this reason, Kechiporanko told Subject to think it over and talk to\nValentin (Logunov) in London about it. Also, Kechiporanko told Subject that they\nhadn't forgotten about the \"branch office\" and that Subject shouldn't feel bad\nabout the delay in setting it up. Subject ridiculed that idea, saying that it was\nthe Soviets who should feel bad; as for him, he couldn't be bothered in the future\nwith the trip and the time involved. Kechiporanko, still not satisfied, asked if\nSubject would provide information on all changes in visa regulations for travel in\nCentral and South America. Subject said he had given this information to the\nSoviets in the past. Kechiporanko then asked Subject to continue to give such\ninformation to Valentin.\n\nSubject related to Kechiporanko that he was working in the Latin-American\nSection of the Foreign Ministry, and that he was allowed to come and go as he\npleased to visit Subject. In the context of telling Subject that he saw that\nSubject was not getting along with his Soviet friends, Kechiporanko said that he\nwould be coming back to London next year.\n\nOne day while Kechiporanko was in the hotel room, the phone rang and Subject\npicked up the phone. A female voice asked for \"Gloy.\" Subject blearily replied\nin Russian that \"Gloy\" wasn't around, but wouldn't do. In the ensuing conversa-\ntion, Subject found out that the caller was a 25-year-old student, her address and\ntelephone number, and made an appointment to see her the following day at the train station\nc. It of the Petro. Kechiporanko was all in favor of Subject making the date, and\nas a matter of fact came the next day to take Subject's son to the circus so that\nSubject would be free. [Comment: Subject said that he never did go to meet the girl,\nbut told Kechiporanko that he had gone and the girl had not shown up. Subject\nwas of the opinion this was not a provocation by the Soviets, but he shied away\nbecause he did not want to be involved in anything indiscreet.]\n\nThen Alexander Prikhodko dropped in unexpectedly at Subject's office on 9\nDecember, while Subject's wife and son were present, the Soviet asked when he could\nhave lunch with Subject, and the latter put him off telling Prikhodko to call next\nweek. [Comment: Prikhodko did not call.]\n\nOn 9 December, Valentin Logunov, who had called Subject's office by phone to\nhave Subject come down to the street, saw Subject for just a minute to present him\nwith two tickets to the Bolshoi Ballet for 9 December. [Comment: Subject attended.]\nOn 13 December, Legnino came unannounced to Subject's office and prevailed on him to come with him to Paris. The Soviet presented Subject with four bottles of vodka for Christmas, and asked Subject to send a series of personal greetings to the Soviet. Subject left Paris for Berlin after WWII - had his documentation been lost or stolen? Subject answered that it was lost.\n\nIf you can be able to enter Paris - did he have a valid French visa? Subject said he did. How long did he stay in Paris? Subject said a few months.\n\nDid he receive from service with the Polish U.S. Subject said yes. Were there any restrictions to this request? Subject said no. Did he suppose to be contacted by the Polish but not said yes, and related the story of how he was arrested in Berlin in 1941 by a Polish diplomatic courier who brought a letter from Subject's old comrade in the U.S., and how Subject answered that letter. Did Subject receive in the Polish team positive or negative? Subject said neutral. Related why, Subject replied that he believed that eighty percent of the Poles were anti-Soviet. Legnino said coming right.\n\nLegnino told how Subject was getting along with the American airman he dealt with. Subject a Latvian, and asked why. Legnino said that maybe, if Subject had the chance, he could learn more about the director of the CIA in London. Subject told Legnino it was crazy to think Subject could get that information. Then Legnino persisted in knowing whether Subject would tell the Soviets if he did get that information, Subject dismissed the topic with a few words.\n\nSubject wanted to show Legnino the documents that backed up his story on Legnino's questions.\n\nOn 13 December, Jurek Yatsak dropped by Subject's office to see if he could get his visa to leave. He brought back from Moscow. Comment: Subject had seen Yatsak a few days earlier, the Soviet's travel to London by arranging for Subject's travel to Paris to meet Yatsak. Yatsak expressed gratitude to Subject for providing him with a bottle of Canadian wine, some vodka, a decoration for the dinner of honor. Yatsak (who no longer held the post of Soviet Consul in London) told Subject that he had also prepared for what Subject had done for \"them,\" and he was sure that Subject would not let them down in the realization of their common ideals. And Yatsak further said that he was subject to every such in common, and that they should meet. It was left that Yatsak would see Subject.\n\n7. Subject's Office in City Station\n\nThe CIA met Subject at his office on 22 November 1966 to debrief him on the results of his trip to Moscow (see paragraph 3 A. above). In addition to providing information on his contacts with Kuchipenko, Subject gave incidental information concerning a famous Soviet Jew he met, and the anti-American attitude of a general agent from Chile.\n\nOn 8 December, in Subject's office, Subject reported to the CIA on his contacts with Kuchipenko and Legnino on 3 and 5 December. In response to Legnino's request, re-opened with Subject the Legnino's community support that Secretary of Governmental Economic Intelligence in his capacity as next president of Mexico. Subject related that when Jacobo Zabludovsky had come to mention the matter to Subject, bringing the fact that Subject had been proposed to one of the five influential members of the Jewish community for Scheuerle's approval (Zabludovsky did not mention the other. The CIA requested that Subject check further with Zabludovsky then have an opportunity.\nOn 17th December, the C/O directed Subject to the C/O about legitimate personal matters of Subject. On the same day, the latter was asked such questions. Subject did not answer, though he was completely puzzled by this lack of part of the sub-theme. Subject did not feel perfectly at ease in telling the truth to the C/O, and had no hesitation in showing them his documentation.\n\nOn 22 December, after having visited a Christmas gift to Subject, he told the C/O that he had met Flight Sergeant Victor J. Jackson.\n\n1. Subject mentioned that he had received a holiday-season letter from \"Dear\" Victor Jackson, U.S. Air Force Officer, now in Chile. Subject asked Subject to report the news of his going. Subject had received a letter from Air Force in January, to which Subject had replied that he would be able to report the news of his going, but did not mention C/O if \"Dear\" Victor had any interest in the taking the trip. The C/O replied that Subject would be invited.\n\nThe C/O then discussed seriously with Subject the question of taking the trip, since the break-off from the Station was really near, inasmuch as there was every prospect that he would leave the Station. Subject stated that the acceptance came from Air Force, and that he had been told to report the news of his departure. C/O asked Subject to send a letter to the Station to inform them of Subject's departure. Subject asked the C/O if there was any \"hassle\" in giving the go-ahead on passing the documentation. C/O advised Subject to pass the documentation to the Station, because he would not be the one to pass it to the C/O; Subject's role was to pass the documentation to the Station.\n\nOn 17th January 1947, the C/O (having received the Station's approval of Subject's departure) followed up the invitation from Air Force, and Subject for more details concerning the invitation from Air Force, and gave him the go-ahead to pursue the matter.\n\n4. The current C/O, Mr. Terrence R. Vachon, will turn Subject over to Mr. Vachon before Subject's departure from Mexico the end of January 1947.\nREFERENCE: HMMW-13985, 16 September 1965\n\nAttached in draft form is an SPR on Subject, which is supplemented by information in the Reference concerning Subject's activities before coming to Mexico.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\n\nAttachments:\nA. Draft SPR, herewith\nB. Photographs, herewith\nC. Sections 16 and 19 of Draft SPR, under separate cover\n\nDistribution:\n12 - C/SB, w/atts.\n2 - C/WH, w/o/atts.\n\natt 1 NSM\natt 2 + 3 HW\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nHMMA-32872\nDATE\n24 August 1967\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\nNOE FILE NUMBER\n201-285412\nSPR PREPARED BY: Jonathan L. WEENING\n\nDATE: 14 August 1967\n\n1. NAME: Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (3, 5).\n\n2. DPOB: 23 December 1927 in Moscow (28).\n   Subject has stated that he comes from Moscow (1), and his wife said they\ngrew up together in Moscow (6). He once told another source, however, that\nhe came from the northern part of the USSR (6), but this source is not\nknown for accurate reporting.\n\n3. CITIZENSHIP AND PASSPORT DATA:\n   Soviet Diplomatic Passport # 16993, issued 24 Aug 1960 (3).\n   Soviet Diplomatic Passport # 010264, issued 24 Jun 1965 (5), used currently (4).\n\n4. ETHNIC ORIGIN: Unknown.\n\n5. OTHER NAMES USED: Unknown.\n\n6. CURRENT POSITION: Third Secretary and Consul General at the Soviet\n   Embassy in Mexico City, Mexico (1).\n\n7. RELATIVES:\n   Wife: Aleksandra Dmitriyevna LOGINOVA (28). Known as \"Shura\" (1).\n   DPOB: 20 Aug 1928 in Moscow (28).\n   Passports: D-16094, used in 1962 (4).\n   D-1810010265, issued 24 Jun 1955, currently used (4).\n   Description: Plump, has reddish hair (15). Photographs are attached.\n   Languages: LOGINOVA has been studying Spanish with Carmen ROURE\n   Canosa, a local employee of the Soviets (4), since at least June 1966 through May\n   1967 (1), but her Spanish is still said to be very limited (6, 25). She is said\nto speak a little English (25), and claimed she had studied English in Moscow\n(1). She is also said to speak some French (25).\n(wife, cont.)\n\nMiscellaneous: LOGINOVA has said that she has known her husband since age six as neighbors in Moscow (6). She claims to be a chemical engineer (6). During Subject's tour in Havana, 1960-63, LOGINOVA worked in the Soviet Consulate (28). She arrived in Mexico on 10 Oct 1965, two months after her husband (4). Since Feb 1966 she had been reported as chairman of the zhenskom (Soviet women's organization), and as such has had to persuade the Soviet women to do various administrative chores, as well as being involved with running the dacha that the Soviets have had in Cuernavaca in the summers of 1966 and 1967 (1).\n\nFamily: In June 1967 LOGINOVA asked the wife of Commercial Counselor Viktor Mikhaylovich IVANOVA (201-245651) to call her mother when she got to Moscow, saying that her family lived at the Botanical Gardens (1).\n\nDaughter: Irina, born ca. 1952 (28).\n\nIn June 1967 LOGINOVA said she had a fifteen-year-old daughter, who was living with LOGINOVA's mother (in Moscow) (6). In April 1967 LOGINOVA said her daughter was in an English school in Moscow (25). Irina was reportedly with her parents in Havana, 1960-63 (28); however, she did not travel with them from Havana to Moscow on 11 May 1962 (4) and therefore may have been in Havana for only a part of Subject's tour. She has not been in Mexico.\n\nSon: Dmitriy (4).\n\nDOB: 1959 (28), birthday probably 6 August (1).\n\nDmitriy was with his parents in Havana, 1960-63 (28), and arrived in Mexico City with his mother on 10 Oct 1965 (4).\n\nSubject has expressed interest in having his son take English lessons when the family returns from home leave in August 1967 (21).\n8. LANGUAGES:\n\nSpanish: Subject speaks fluent Spanish with very little accent (11, 24).\n\nEnglish: Since 1966 Subject has been reported taking English lessons, apparently at the Instituto de Traductores e Interpretes in Mexico City (1). In April 1967 he said that he had been paying a girl [American] for lessons in English, but that she did not have enough background in grammar (25). (Comment: Subject was probably more interested in meeting American girls than in studying English in this case.) Subject's English is believed to be fair at present.\n\n9. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS:\n\nOne source described Subject as tall, blond and blue-eyed (11). Another source said that he was six feet tall and had short, reddish-blonde hair (24). Photographs are attached.\n10. PERSONALITY, CHARACTER, HABITS:\n\nAll sources agree in describing Subject as smooth and completely self-controlled. He is an aggressive conversationalist. One source described him as vulgar, crude, ill-mannered, short-tempered and a tyrant, who thinks he is a big shot (8).\n\nSubject seems to have made a play for every girl he has met. In at least one instance he has claimed to be unmarried when inviting a girl out (27). When his wife was staying at the dacha in Cuernavaca he reportedly made dates with other women (8). On 13 Sep 1966 he was seen in a cafe with a Mexican-looking woman (18).\n\nSubject is interested in sports and is good at them. In Sep 1966 it was reported that he did not play tennis (15), and by Apr 1967 he was said to be a good tennis player, claimed that he had been playing for less than a year and never played more than once a week (25). He is said to have the build of a trained athlete, the brutish look of a boxer or wrestler, and the grace of a natural athlete (25). He has said that he boxed when he was younger, and that he plays basketball and volleyball (25), also that his favorite sports are skiing and speed skating (21). He also plays chess but is not an addict (25). He has belonged to the French Club in Mexico City since ca. November 1965 (1) and has been seen there frequently on weekends, sometimes with his wife and child (15). One Sunday (20 Mar 1966) Subject and Yevgeny Nikolayevich GORLITSYN were seen playing badminton with their wives at the French Club (15).\n\nOne source reported that Subject smoked \"Fiesta\" cigarettes (8), and another source reported in Apr 1967 that Subject did not smoke (25). One source has reported that Subject downed several beers after playing tennis (25), but another source reported that on a social occasion Subject did not even finish one Scotch and water (19). On 1966 Subject and Vladislav Sergeyevich KOR MUSHKIN reported drove into the Soviet Embassy at 0300 hours roaring drunk (8), which may or may not be accurate reporting.\nSubject has apparently been taking English lessons since early 1966 at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, which is located at Tiber. He seems to have made friends with a number of people through these classes. (1) (Cf. under Contacts.)\n\nIn February 1966 it was reported that Subject's wife had bought a tape recorder (1). In June 1967 Subject himself ordered a Grundig tape recorder (1).\n\nSubject was reported having an operation on 1 Feb 1966 (17); no further details are available.\n\n11. CURRICULUM VITAE:\n\nSubject claims that he has served in the Red Army (8).\n\n(Subject's name was reportedly listed in Feb 1960 as about to be assigned to Buenos Aires as Soviet Military Attache; it would appear that either this was another person with the same name, or that Subject was being considered for assignment there as diplomatic attache.)\n\n14 Sep 1960 Subject and his family arrived in Havana, where Subject was assigned as Attache at the Soviet Embassy (3, 28).\n\nDecember 1961 Subject toured Latin America as escort and interpreter for the Dynamo soccer team (28).\n\nSep 1963 Subject and his family left Havana PCS (28).\n\n3 Aug 1965 Subject arrived PCS in Mexico City as Third Secretary assigned to the Soviet Embassy (4). Subject replaced Oleg Makstmovich NECHIPOR-ENKO as Vice Consul (1).\n10 Oct 1965\n\nSubject's wife and son arrived in Mexico (4).\n\nAugust 1966\n\nSubject was apparently promoted to Consul General after Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV left Mexico on 4 Aug 1966 for home leave. In Sep 1966 Subject was telling everyone in town that he was now the Consul (1, 6, etc.)\n\n16 Jul 1967\n\nSubject, accompanied by his wife and son, left Mexico for Moscow via Paris (4). Also travelling with them on LOGINOVA's passport was Tatyana, the daughter of Boris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH (4). Subject has told several people that this is home leave and that he will be returning to Mexico (1, 6, 21, 22).\n\n12. INTELLIGENCE AFFILIATION: Known KGB, based on his having taken over an agent previously handled by known KGB officers Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO (201-305870) and Aleksandr Vladimirovich PRIKHODKO (201-202379), as well as his other intelligence activities given below.\n13. INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES:\n(Cf. also information under Contacts, below. Subject has undoubtedly been\ndeveloping contacts, particularly with American girls, with a view toward\nintelligence possibilities.)\n\nIn December 1961 while travelling with the Dynamo soccer team, Subject\nmet a Bolivian security/official in La Paz, Bolivia and reportedly tried to\npersuade him to study in Cuba. The source, however, is believed to be a\nfabricator. (28).\n\nAfter Subject saw the soccer team off, he continued to Panama, where he\nmet with a Mexican citizen, Edmundo Fausto ZORRILLA Martinez (P-2818)\non 16 Dec 1961, and on 17 Dec 1961 Subject and ZORRILLA travelled to\nMexico City on the same plane. Subject received (US) $2,000; had ca. (US)\n$2,000 with him in Panama. (29).\n\nOn 14 Feb 1966 KGB officer Aleksandr Vladimirovich PRIKHODKO\n(201-202379) turned an agent over to Subject. (The agent had previously been\nhandled by Subject's predecessor, Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO.)\nOn 14 Apr 1966 the agent attempted to break his intelligence relationship with\nthe Soviets, although he has remained in business and social contact with them.\nSubject, occasionally joined by PRIKHODKO, has continued to give intelligence\nrequirements to the agent, and questioned him particularly about his access to\nthe U.S. Embassy and tried to persuade him to continue cooperating with\nthe KGB. On 24 Jun 1966 Subject asked the agent for information on Eduardo\nWEBELMAN and his son Mauricio. On 13 Dec 1966 Subject asked the agent\nto try to find out who the WOFACt chief in Mexico was. (6). (Comment:\nMauricio WEBELMAN was subsequently reported to be a friend of suspect\nKGB officer Yevgeny Nikolayevich GORLITSYN's.)\nOn 20 Jan 1966 Cristobal TORRES Ponce, chauffeur employed by the U.S. Embassy in Mexico, was sent to the Soviet Embassy to pick up the passport of the wife of a U.S. Embassy official who was planning a trip to the USSR. Subject talked to TORRES, asked him if he would like to visit the USSR or receive Soviet magazines, and if he knew anyone who would be willing to give him English lessons, and finally made a dinner date with TORRES for 24 Jan 1966. When TORRES did not keep the date, Subject called him on 8 and 9 Feb 1966 in an attempt to keep the contact alive. (12, 14).\n\nSubject dealt with the Federal District police several times in July 1966 in regard to a radio that had been stolen from his car. On 20 Jul 1966 the policeman (LNO) who had been handling the radio case reported to his superior, General Luis CUETO Ramirez, that Subject had offered him 5,000 pesos (4,000 dollars) a month if he would work for him. After consulting with the Minister of Interior, CUETO told the policeman to accept Subject's offer, which he reportedly did on 21 Jul 1966. Subject's first assignment to the policeman was to locate Venezuelan citizens Nicolas Juan BOSTROEM and his wife. (16). (Comment: Nothing further has been learned about this case. BOSTROM is a native Russian employed by Stephens-Adamson de Mexico, his wife teaches Russian at the Ibero-American University.)\n\nSubject has occasionally been reported visiting the small general store located across the street from the Soviet Embassy. On 5 Nov 1966 Subject reportedly questioned the store owner about occupants of one apartment building in the same block as the store, and on 6 Dec 1966 he asked general questions about the new apartment building at the end of the block. (8). (Comment: Both of these buildings contain base houses for the fixed surveillance of the Soviet Embassy.)\n14. NON-INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY:\n\nIn Mexico, Subject has consistently been reported performing consular duties. He issues visas and sees visitors to the Soviet Embassy in one of the reception rooms (21). He makes travel reservations for PCS and visiting Soviets. He is responsible when either PCS or visiting Soviets become ill and have to be sent to a hospital. He has often attended to the needs of Soviet ships in Mexican ports. He has done considerable house-hunting for the Soviets, such as looking for a new school building and for houses in Cuernavaca that would be suitable as a dacha. Subject had to sign the dacha contract in both 1966 and 1967. Subject also regularly attends the functions of the Consular Corps Association, and on 16 Feb 1967 he had the Association to the Soviet Embassy for a Russian evening. (1). In Sep 1966 Subject was reported as having become the Consul General (6, 8, 1, 11), having replaced Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV, who left Mexico for home leave on 4 Aug 1966. On 21 Feb 1967 Subject tried to get Panamanian visas for himself and Soveksportfilm representative Aleksandr Aleksandrovich NIKITIN (known KGB) to attend a Consular Congress to be held in Panama 11-15 Apr 1967 (1). The visas were refused.\n\nOn 26 Jan 1966 Subject attended a lecture given by a Mexican who was an exchange professor at a U.S. university. The lecture was sponsored by the PRI. Soviet Cultural Attache Svyatoslav Fedorovich KUZNETSOV also attended the lecture and sat on the platform, whereas Subject sat at the back of the room. (13).\n\nSubject is reported to have taken the following trips in Mexico:\n\n26-28 Oct 1965 To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship (11).\n2-4 Nov 1965 To Mazatlan with Yevgeny Nikolayevich GORLITSYN to attend to Soviet ship (1).\n4-8 Dec 1965 To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship (1, 9).\n2-5 Feb 1966 To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship (1).\n13-20 Feb 1966  To Coatzacoalcos to attend to Soviet ships. Soviet Embassy chauffeur Anatoly Pavlovich PRASICHKIN went with Subject but returned to Mexico City earlier. (1).\n\n25-28 Apr 1966  Possibly to Guadalajara with Soviet tourist visitors attending a travel conference there (1).\n\n4-9 May 1966  To Veracruz to attend to the matter of a missing Soviet sailor (1).\n\n27-30 May 1966  To Veracruz to attend to Soviet ship (1).\n\n26 Feb - 2 Mar 1966  To Veracruz with Soviet Commercial Counselor Viktor Mikhailovich IVANOV to attend to Soviet ships (1). While in Veracruz, Subject asked the U.S. Vice Consul, Richard BOOTH, if he would intercede with the Mexican authorities to get shore leave for the Soviet crew (24).\n15. CONTACTS,\n\na. Soviet Contacts:\n\nSubject has been seen coming and going at the Soviet Embassy most frequently with Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123, known KGB), for whom Subject replaced as Consul. Since Subject's departure on home leave on 16 Jul 1967, YATSKOV has been seen regularly using Subject's car.\n\nSubject has also been observed leaving the Soviet Embassy fairly often with Ivan Konstantinovich BARANOV (201-22382, 277838, known KGB sweeper) and Boris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH (201-767974, suspect KGB technician). Subject has also borrowed the cars of YATSKOV and known KGB chauffeur Vasily Stepanovich MIROSHNIKOV (21-273046), (7).\n\nIn May 1966 Subject reportedly gave the wife of Aleksandr Aleksandrovich (201-784917, known KGB) a hard time when she wanted to send her son to the USSR with another Soviet wife. NIKITIN then complained to Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Vlasov (201-202379, known KGB), who reportedly ordered Subject to get a ticket for the NIKITIN child, (1). Cf. also above, where PRIKHODKO seems to be the senior case officer for an agent currently being handled by Subject.\n\nIn May 1967 LOGINOVA mentioned that she had known Boris Aleksandrovich CHMYKHOV (201-268115, known GRU) for years, (1). (Comment: CHMYKHOV was stationed in Havana 1960-62, at the same time that Subject was there.)\n\nCf. below for report of Subject's having taken CHMYKHOV with him to Cuernavaca to meet ZAREBSKI.\n\nSubject has also been reported in contact with the following Soviets not stationed in Mexico:\n\nVitaly Konstantinovich BOYAROV (201-355606, known KGB), visited Mexico 27 May - 9 Jun 1966. On 1 Jun 1966 Subject and P.A. YATSKOV were absent from the Soviet Embassy for four hours with BOYAROV (7).\n\nVasily Vasilyevich GRIGORYEV, member of petroleum delegation that\nvisited Mexico 31 Mar - 14 Apr 1967. While GIRCORYEV was in Mexico he was reported in contact with Subject several times, once making plans to go to the movies together, also to ask Subject whether he should attend a French reception and to report the illness of one of the other Soviet delegates.\n\n(1)\n\nBoris Semenovich IVANOV (201-078078, known KGB), visited Mexico 8 - 22 Feb 1967. Subject made reservations for IVANOV in Mexico City and probably saw him off at the airport (1).\n\nYuri Vladimirovich LEBEDEV (201-213261), Minister Counselor at the Soviet Embassy in Havana. On 7 Feb 1966 Subject was reported sending something to LEBEDEV with a Soviet professor who was travelling back to Moscow via Havana (1).\n15. b. Non-Soviet Contacts:\n\n1). Alonso AGUILAR Monteverde (P-2152, 201-334259), active Marxist intellectual.\n\nOn 28 Jun 1967 AGUILAR reminded Subject that they and their wives were invited for Saturday evening to the home of Alberto PENICHE (1). (Alberto PENICHE Blanco, P-12294, manager of Ek centrist newspaper El Heraldo de Mexico, and reported as minor contributor to the PCM in 1964.)\n\n2). (Mrs.) Gloria ALFARO, no other traces.\n\nOn 5 Feb 1966 Mrs. ALFARO (possibly Gloria) wanted to talk to Subject to congratulate him on a Soviet moon probe (1). On 22 Jun 1966 Gloria ALFARO reminded Subject that they had met at the house of Mrs. SOTO (possibly Graciela, q.v.) on Christmas Eve 1965 and invited Subject to a party. Subject was unable to go but said he would call Gloria for coffee. In 1964 ALFARO gave her telephone as 35-71-30 (listed to Yolanda Vda de CACERES Butrago, Chilapas 130-A, current telephone 25-10-24). (1). Qx\n\nAlso on 22 Jun 1966 Gloria ALFARO told Subject she would like to talk with some of the Soviets, and Subject suggested getting together on Friday \"after English class\" (17). (Comment: ALFARO may have been studying English with Subject at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores.) On 3 Aug 1966 Gloria and Subject tried to agree on a date to get together, and she said she would like for him to meet a friend (female) of hers who was visiting Mexico from Central America (1).\n\n3). Ofelia ALFARO Lopez (P-11339), professor of economics at UNAM, good friend of the wife of Antonio SARMIENTO (q.v.), social contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 30 Aug 1965 ALFARO invited Sergey Sergeyevich KONSTANTINOV to her house and included Subject and Leonid Vasilievich NIKIFOROV (1).\n\n4). (Dr.) Juan Luis ALVAREZ Gayou, teacher at UNAM and Deputy Director of Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores.\nSubject presumably met ALVAREZ at the Instituto, where Subject is believed to have studied English. The first reported contact was on 11 Apr 1966, when they spoke to each other, using the familiar form of address, about having missed each other in Cuernavaca. Subject was invited to ALVAREZ' birthday party. Subject said he would see ALVAREZ the following day when he was going to have class with a new teacher.\n\nOn 13 Jun 1966 Professor Mr. ALVAREZ, Juan Luis' father, asked Subject if he would bring the projector to the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, and Subject said he would. On 12 Jul 1966 ALVAREZ, who had been out of town, asked Subject if he wanted to continue taking lessons, and Subject said yes, he would go there the following day. On 19 Nov 1966 ALVAREZ left a message for Subject to call him at 35-68-96 (listed to Natividad GAMERO de la Fuente, Hamburgo 25). On 22 May 1967 ALVAREZ asked Subject for help in typing a letter in Russian (cf. VIDIELLA). (1).\n\n5. (Ing.) Manuel ANAYA S., employee of Mexican Ministry of Hydraulic Resources, visited the USSR in summer 1966.\n\nOn 19 Jul 1966 ANAYA thanked Subject for his visa and said he would get together with Subject when he got back in order to discuss his trip (17).\n\n6. Emilia AROSAMENA Vallarina (P-10933, 201-771073), Panamanian Consul General in Mexico, in contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 15 Nov 1965 Aleksandr Vladimirovich PRIKHODKO said he wanted to introduce Subject to AROSAMENA, because Subject had some questions to ask her. Presumably related is a report that the Panamanian Counselor, Jose B. CALVO, told Subject on 19 Nov 1965 that he had no answer for Subject yet. (1).\n\n7. Miriam AVILA Katz (P-581, 201-814144), employee of Mundus Tours travel agency, about to leave Mexico to marry an American and live in New York.\nSubject was first reported in contact with AVILA in April 1966 in connection with travel booking. Subject made (1). On 2 Jun 1966 Subject flirted with her, and said he would invite her to a volleyball game (1). During the rest of 1966 Subject invited her out a few times, told her he was married but that his wife was not in Mexico, asked her to introduce him to some of her friends and especially wanted to know if she knew anyone in the U.S. Embassy. In April 1967 Subject reluctantly agreed to issue a visa to Dr. KUTTLER (q.v.), whose travel AVILA was arranging, and asked as a return favor that she introduce him to some of her friends. (26). In June 1967 Subject reportedly stopped AVILA coming out of work to ask her about the Israeli War (6).\n\n6). Cella BAYARDI Torres, no traces.\n\nOn 7 Feb 1966 an unidentified man visited Subject at the Soviet Embassy. This man came to the Embassy in a car driven by a woman, who remained in the car, with license plates registered to Cella BAYARDI Torres, Arquitecto 46, Colonia Escandon, telephone 15-34-02. The phone is listed to Francisca TORRES Vda de BAYARDI. (7).\n\n9). Lella S. BELAVAL, visa officer at U.S. Embassy.\n\nIn June 1967 BELAVAL reported that she had been in contact with Subject over visa matters, that Subject had asked her what she did in the evenings, and had whether she spent her off hours with other U.S. Embassy employees, said that he was unmarried. In June 1967 he offered to take her to the U.S. Intan Ballet when it came to Mexico. She has refused his invitations. (27).\n\n10). Carlos BLANCO Solano (P-9328), Federal Security (DFS) agent, now with Judicial Police. In 1960-61 BLANCO invited several U.S. Embassy girls out and offered his services to the U.S. Embassy. BLANCO works for Carlos CASAMADRID Miranda, who is suspected of having a clandestine relationship with KGB officer Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV.\nOn 1 Nov 1965 BLANCO called Subject at the Soviet Embassy and remarked that they had not seen each other for a long time. Subject said he would call BLANCO the following Wednesday. On 8 Sep 1966 Gracelena (q.v.), who described herself as BLANCO's friend, invited Subject to the baptism of her son Rafael's child and mentioned that BLANCO's wife Magdalena was going. On 10 Nov 1966 BLANCO invited Subject to a party for BLANCO's daughter, said they would first go to the church near Gracelena's house on Tamaulipas. On 6 Dec 1966 BLANCO told Subject that \"Comandante Carlos\" (presumably CASAMADRID) urgently wanted to see YATSKOV (q.v.), and Subject said he would have YATSKOV call him.\n\n11. Lubomir BLAZIK (P-1730, 201-206043), former Czech Second Secretary and Consul in Mexico.\n\nOn 28 Dec 1965 P.A., YATSKOV left a message for BLAZIK that Subject's wife was sick and could not attend the dinner to which the BLAZIKs had invited her.\n\n12. Rosa Martha BRACHO Sanchez (P-12038), left in November 1965 on a scholarship to study ballet in the USSR.\n\nOn 21 and 22 Sep 1966 Rosa's mother (fnl) was in contact with Subject in order to talk to him about visa problems of her two daughters who were both studying dance in the USSR. (Name of other daughter is unknown.)\n\n13. Erika KAMMERMAN (P-12843), said to be a reporter with The News (17), but this seems unlikely, no other traces.\n\nOn 21 Feb 1966 KAMMERMAN told Subject that she was going out of town the next day but when she got back she wanted to invited Subject and his wife to her house. Subject said he had no word on her papers yet. On 28 Feb 1966 she said she had been in Cozumel, Subject said he still had no word on her papers. She invited Subject to dinner with his wife, and he said he\nwould call her back. On 10 May 1966 she tried to call Subject, who was out, saying that she wanted to know about the arrival of a man from Russia. On 11 May 1966 Subject told her he still had no answer on her papers. She said she planned to take a business trip to Brussels and Paris in June and mentioned that Elke (LNU) was in Paris visiting her son. On 10 Jun 1966 Subject asked for KAMMERMANN at 18-65-61 and was told she was in Europe for a month (phone listed to importing firm Incomex, S.A., at Isabel la Catolica 45-914). On 6 Jul 1966 Subject called her at 12-78-32 (listed to the Banco de Mexico at Cinco de Mayo 2) and told her he had a document for her. On 11 Jul 1966 she told Subject that she needed his signature on the document, also sent regards to Subject's wife and children. (1).\n\n15. Ernesto CHAZARO Peregrino (P-12818, 201-800-412), assistant security chief of Astilleros de Veracruz, S.A., a shipyard in Veracruz. Said to be the adventurer-type, once worked for the Federal Security Police but was fired because of involvement in arms contraband.\n\nCHAZARO probably did meet Subject on 5 May 1966 in Veracruz. CHAZARO undoubtedly fabricated his story that Subject tried to recruit him after that and set up a 50,000 peso bank account in CHAZARO's name. (30).\nSubject's contact with CHENCINSKY has presumably been connected with Subject's taking English at the Instituto. On 24 Mar 1966 CHENCINSKY tried unsuccessfully to reach Subject. On 4 Jul 1966 CHENCINSKY told Subject that Janet (LNU, apparently Subject's teacher) had been unable to fix her working papers and had had to leave Mexico and asked if Subject's classes could be postponed. Subject agreed and said he would like to talk to CHENCINSKY. (1).\n\n6. David F. COOLBAUGH (P-12579, 201-796142), American employed with United Nations in Mexico, co-director of geological project that two Soviets were also assigned to.\n\nIn 1966 Subject was in contact with COOLBAUGH several times in regard to documenting the two Soviets working on the UN project (1).\n\n7. Ana Maria ESCOBAR (P-11858), in 1965 reported to be a student and also working as private secretary to the PRI chief for the Federal District.\n\nOn 11 Oct 1965 ESCOBAR tried unsuccessfully to reach Subject.\n\nOn 12 Oct 1965 she told Subject she had wanted to invite him to the theater the previous day because she had been given free tickets. She sent regards to Pablo (presumably Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV). (1).\n\n8. Margaret (aka Magre) FEDOR (P-12967), no other traces.\n\nOn 17 Mar 1966 FEDOR invited Subject to go on a Sunday outing with a group of friends whom Subject also knew. She mentioned that she was studying French in the evenings and was about to begin Russian classes at the United Nations. Subject said he would call her at home later. On 28 Mar 1966 Subject told FEDOR that he had stopped by her house with theater tickets but she had been out. Rebeca (LNU) had told FEDOR that the play was good. FEDOR told Subject that on Saturday there would be a discussion with Jose CORNEJO (no identifiable traces), who had been in South America, and Subject said he would go. On 8 Jun 1966 FEDOR told Subject that she\nwas going to go to the U.S. on vacation and mentioned that Daniel SEIN (no traces) had asked about Subject. Subject said he would call her later.\n\nOn 24 Aug 1966 PEDOR told Subject that there would be a discussion about India at her house on 26 Aug, and Subject said he would try to go. Sixx Subject asked her whether she knew the Soviets working on a United Nations project, but she said she did not. (Comment: PEDOR may work at the United Nations in Mexico City.)\n\n12. Enu FLORES, man employed at Mex-American travel agency.\n\nOn 15 Mar 1966 FLORES, who described himself as a friend of Gloria's and the others', asked Subject for visa information (1). (Gloria might be Gloria PINTO, cf. below.)\n\n20. Socorro FLORES (P-12259), employed at Mex-Americana de Viajes travel agency, no other traces.\n\nSubject was first reported in contact with FLORES in Sep 1965 in connection with travel reservations, and for about a year Subject continued to discuss travel arrangements and at the same time flirt with FLORES and also send regards to Susana LNU, who worked with her. On 8 Sep 1966 Subject arranged to meet FLORES in front of a movie theater. Then there was no report of contact between them, until on 13 Jun 1967 FLORES told Subject that she had a new job and asked him to call her at 27-85-50, extension 18 (no Station listing of this number). She mentioned that she had not seen him for a while. (1).\n27. (D). Rafael FUSONI Alordi (P-5119, 201-237904), Argentine diplomat, former KGB agent. In occasional social contact with Soviets, primarily through diplomatic functions.\n\nSubject met FUSONI at a consular function in January 1967 and again at a Czech Embassy reception in May 1967. Subject later called FUSONI and offered him tickets to a Bolshoy Ballet performance, and on 11 Jun 1967 they attended the Bolshoy performance together and went to supper afterwards. (23).\n\n22. (B). Moises CAMERO de la Fuente, no other traces.\n\nOn 6 Apr 1966 Subject reportedly called telephone number 2-30-65 in Cuernavaca from a pay phone (8). (This number is listed to CAMERO.)\n\n23. (C). Pearl GONZALEZ (P-11420), society editor for The News, Mexico City English language newspaper, in social contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 25 Nov 1965 GONZALEZ gave a party and invited several Soviets.\n\nSubject was one of those who attended. (10).\n\n24. (D). Alfonso GUZMAN and Carlos SANDOVAL, of Servicio Diplomatico in the Mexican Foreign Ministry.\n\nSince Aug 1966 (i.e., when Subject became Consul General), Subject has been reported dealing with GUZMAN and SANDOVAL in regard to Soviet visas. In Oct 1966 Subject had tickets for GUZMAN to a sports event, but GUZMAN was unable to go. Subject also invited GUZMAN to the Soviet Embassy reception on 7 Nov 1966. (1).\n\n25. (D). Abdel Rahman HASSAN Abdel-Rahman, First Secretary and Consul at the UAR Embassy in Mexico.\n\nOn 1 Jun 1967 Subject and HASSAN discussed consular affairs and also talked about getting together for tennis the following week (1).\n\n26. (D). (Miss) HERNANDEZ, of the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, probably identical with Gabriela HERNANDEZ Elizalde, who in 1967 was the secretary at this Institute.\nOn 29 Jun 1966 HERNANDEZ told Subject that his class would be postponed for a week because Sarita (LNU) was sick (1).\n\n27.28. Lee HIGGINS, male, no traces.\n\nOn 19 May 1966 HIGGINS tried unsuccessfully to call Subject (1).\n\n29.27. Vincent HODGINS, British citizen, sales manager of Canadian Pacific Airlines in Mexico City.\n\nOn 28 Oct 1966 HODGINS contacted Subject, saying that BRADLEY (J. E. Ralph BRADLEY, regional sales manager of Canadian Pacific) had met Subject the night before, and HODGINS wanted to discuss business with Subject. HODGINS offered to visit HODGINS in his office (1).\n\n(Comment: The Soviets began flying with Canadian Pacific when a new Aeroflot flight was put in service to Canada.) On 3 Nov 1966 HODGINS gave Subject information on flights and Subject said he would stop by his office the next week. On 24 Feb 1967 Subject was reported to have an appointment with HODGINS (1).\n\n29.28. Jan JAKOWIEC (P-9097, 201-250618), Polish Second Secretary and Consul in Mexico.\n\nSubject and JAKOWIEC seem to be good friends, in addition to being in contact with each other through consular duties (1, 19).\n\n30.29. Karen JOFFER, no other traces.\n\nOn 16 Aug 1966 Subject apologized to JOFFER that he had been busy the week before but said he could see her at 1630 hours that day (1). (Comment: This could well be a routine visa request.)\n31. (Dr.) Yury KUTTLER (P-1573), dentist, Soviet contact, Communist sympathizer.\n\nIn Apr 1966 Subject was reported making a dental appointment with the tourist agency representative, KUTTLER (1). In Apr 1967 when Miriam AVILA Katz was trying to get a visa for KUTTLER, Subject spoke scathingly of him and said he would not give him a visa unless he fulfilled all the requirements (1). Subject explained that he had once gone to KUTTLER to have some dental work done and that KUTTLER had charged him too much, and that this was why he did not want to issue him the visa (26).\n\n32. Jacques LEMAIRE, representative of French steamship company in Mexico, scheduled to leave Mexico soon, member of French Club, where he probably met Subject.\n\nOn 14 Jul 1967 LEMAIRE invited Subject to the French Embassy reception that day, but Subject was unable to go. LEMAIRE sent regards to Subject's wife (1).\n\n33. Yuliya LIPOVSKAYA, probably identical with the Julia YASCHIN listed in the telephone book as living at Mexicali 175, phone 15-35-47, presumably the wife of Salk Solomon (aka Julio) YASCHIN.\nOn 30 Nov 1965 LIPOVSKAYA contacted Subject and told him a long, rambling story about her relatives. Subject was evidently interested, urged her to visit the USSR and suggested she come to the Soviet Embassy to talk to him. On 24 Dec 1965 LIPOVSKAYA tried to call Subject but was referred by mistake to another Valentina. On 8 and 20 Jan 1966 she asked Subject if he had heard from her relative, the soccer player Lev YASCHIN, but Subject still had no news for her. (1).\n\n34. Tatiana RAKOFF Vda de MARCAND (P-370), widow of Rene MARCAND Boisselet, former professor at UNAM and director of the Yugoslav Cultural Institute. She is evidently a native Russian, but French citizen.\n\nTatiana was seen visiting Subject at the Soviet Embassy on 3 Jan and 18 Apr 1967; Subject seemed very friendly with her, and on 18 Apr 1967 left the Embassy together with her. (7). On 9 Jan 1967 it appeared that she had asked Subject for a visa. She also told him she had the information on the man who had been consul, but Subject cut her off and said that it would be better for them to get together to discuss it. On 25 Feb 1965 she told Subject she would help him join a club. On 16 May 1967 she asked Subject if he had called the Poles, but he said he had forgotten and would do it right away. (1).\n\n35. (Dr.) Alfonso MARTINEZ Alvarez (P-1799), Guatemalan leftist doctor, has house at Lake Tequesquitengo to which he often invites groups of Soviets.\n\nMARTINEZ was reported in contact with Subject in fall 1966 and January 1967 inviting Subject and other Soviets to his house on the lake. Subject was also in contact with his son, Eduardo MARTINEZ (no identifiable traces) (1).\n\n36. (General) Raul MENDIOLEA Cerecero (P-5700), deputy chief of the Federal District Police.\n\nOn 27 Oct 1966 Subject called the police to ask what MENDIOLEA's rank was (1).\n\n37. William de MIER (P-5552), British citizen, general manager of KLM airline in Mexico.\nIn May 1967 Subject was reportedly discussing Soviet travel via KLM with de MIER (1, 6).\n\n38. xxx (Lic.) Oscar OBREGON, Jr., not further identified.\n\nOn 2 Jun 1967 OBREGON, who appeared to be a friend of Subject's, told Subject he would like to invite the Bolshoy troups to his house, but Subject said they would have little time in Mexico City. OBREGON also asked Subject if he could get him some caviar, and Subject said he would bring him some back from Moscow after his vacation. (1).\n\n39. David ORNELAS, of Mundus Tours.\n\nORNELAS has been Subject's principal contact at Mundus Tours in regard to making travel bookings. There has been no indication of anything more than a business relationship between them, except that in June 1966 Subject gave ORNELAS some magazines. (1).\n\n40. Salvador PAZ Plata (P-12775), shipping agent with Representaciones Maritimas, Soviet commercial contact.\n\nOn 1 Mar 1966 it was reported that Subject had met PAZ in Mazatlan, and they used the familiar form of address with each other. During 1966 they were occasionally reported making luncheon dates or planning to get together after work. There has been no record of recent contact. (1).\n\n41. Gloria *PINTO, located at telephone 23-62-85, listed to Dr. Jose Maria *PINTO Ancira, Tiju 592, no traces on either name.\n\nOn 17 May 1967 Gloria thanked Subject for giving a visa to her sister-in-law. She said that Ruth (LNU) was going to Valle de Bravo on the weekend, but Subject said he would not be able to go. She added that Alfonso (LNU) would be at the Cafe Jujuy that afternoon at 1700, and Subject said he would try to go and would see Gloria there. On 13 Jun 1967 Gloria told Subject that her daughter did not want to work for Ralph (LNU) any more, because they wanted to send her to Pittsburgh. Subject said he could not go to the party Saturday that was to be held at the home of Ernesto ACEVEDO (no xxxxxx identifiable traces). On 12 Jul 1967 Gloria told Subject that she had everything\nready and that she would stop by the Embassy to say goodbye (perhaps going to the USSR). (1).\n\n42. (Miss) Mercedes PINTO, no identifiable traces.\n\nOn 2 Mar 1967 Mercedes PINTO called Subject, who was out of town (1).\n\n(Comment: Mercedes could be the sister-in-law of Gloria PINTO mentioned above.)\n\n43. Julio PLATAS Urbina (P-6948, 201-300319) claims to be a Soviet courier, has been in contact with the KGB, may be a provocation agent.\n\nOn 29 Oct 1965 PLATAS called, but Subject was out. On 1 Nov 1965 PLATA told Subject he had changed jobs, no longer worked for Mex Hogar but was now with the Confederacion de Trabajadores Mexicanos (labor union).\n\nSubject said he would call him, (1).\n\n44. Rafael Alfredo RAYN (P-8415, 201-357138), manager of Garza Lopez Tours.\n\nSubject has been in contact with RAYN in 1966-67 on routine travel matters. In Aug 1965 Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV asked RAYN for a chart of all commercial passenger ships operating between Veracruz and New York for the month of September 1965, including the cost of travel and baggage. In December 1965 Subject reminded RAYN of YATSKOV's request and asked him to include rail travel to New York and sea travel to Europe on the chart. RAYN never provided the chart. (11).\n\n45. Sara ROSENFIELD and husband Loyd ROSENFIELD (P-11665, 201-789388), both writers for The News.\n\nBoth ROSENFIELDS met Subject at a reception at the Indian Embassy given by the Indian Consul, K.D. PARASILAR. Subject invited them to Soviet Embassy receptions of 16 Feb and 23 Feb 1967, and invited Sara to attend the Home Show with the consular corps, which she did. On 11 Jul 1967 they again met briefly at an Indian Embassy reception. (22).\n46. Fernando SALOMON Jos\u00e9 SALOMON Vallecillo, from Nicaragua.\n\nOn 24 Oct 1966 SALOMON told Subject that he had a letter from the Socialist Party of Nicaragua addressed to the Soviet Consul and that he had come specially from Nicaragua to deliver it. Subject said he would talk to SALOMON the next day at the Soviet Embassy. (1). (SALOMON also made an appointment to see the Cuban Ambassador the same day.)\n\n47. Antonio SARMIENTO de la Barrera (P-12703), businessman who belongs to the French Club and has been reported friendly with several Soviets, particularly Subject's predecessor, Oleg Makslmovich NECHIPORENO, and currently Leonid Vasilyevich NIKIFOROV.\n\nOn 24 Apr 1966 Subject was seen playing chess at the French Club with SARMIENTO and then went swimming with his wife. As of Sep 1966 Subject was reported still very friendly with the SARMIENTOs at the French Club. (15).\n\n48. Francis S. SHERRY, consular officer of the U.S. Embassy.\n\nSubject has met SHERRY at consular corps functions. On 28 Jan 1967 they discussed playing tennis together. (20).\n\n49. (Dr.) Emilliano SORIANO Ariz (P-6741), doctor frequently consulted by the Soviets in Mexico.\n\nIn Nov 1965 Subject took a sick Soviet sailor to be treated by SORIANO. In Dec 1965 and Jan 1966 Subject himself was being treated by SORIANO. (1).\n\n50. Graciela SOTO, no traces.\n\nOn 8 Sep 1966 Graciela, who described herself as Carlos BLANCO's friend (q.v.), invited Subject to the baptism of her son Rafael's child, also mentioned Rosita, who may be Rafael's wife (no traces on Rafael or Rosita SOTO). On 9 Nov 1966 Graciela called Subject, started to chat about having a toothache and that she had tried to call him before, but Subject cut her off and said he would call her the next day and to say hello to everyone. On 10\nNov 1966 Carlos BLANCO invited Subject to a party and said they would first go to the church near Gracelita's house on Tamaulipas. (1). (One Alfredo SOTO, no traces, is listed at Tamaulipas 115.)\n\n51. Jiri SVESTKA (P-7111, 201-285441), Czech Second Secretary and Consul suspect intelligence officer.\n\nSubject and SVESTKA seem to be quite friendly, plan dinner together as well as discussing consular business (1).\n\n52. Leopoldo VAN DYCK, employee of Air France, said to be a homosexual, has been friendly with other Soviet consular officers.\n\nOn 6 and 13 Sep 1965 Subject was reported in contact with VAN DYCK in regard to visas for Air France passengers (17). On 5 Jul 1966 Subject told David ORNELAS of Mundus Tours to give VAN DYCK his regards, adding that VAN DYCK would know what kind of regards they were. (1).\n\n53. Rafael VIDIELLA Ruiz (P-4805, 201-238943), came to Mexico in 1956 with his mother, Lucia RUIZ Garcia (P-4413), who lived in Moscow for 17 years and taught Spanish there - KGB officer Aleksandr Mikhailovich BROVKIN was reportedly one of her students. In 1958-59 Rafael translated for the Soviet TASS correspondent in Mexico, in 1961 he was teaching Russian at the UCMR (Soviet Cultural Institute), and he is currently teaching at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores. His current address is Romero de Terreros 922-1, telephone 43-80-16.\n\nOn 19 May 1967 VIDIELLA's wife tried to call Subject, saying that she was calling on behalf of the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores and that her husband had written a letter in Russian about some tourists and she wanted a Russian typewriter to have it typed up on. (1).\n\n54. (Col. and Lt.) Rafael VILLAURRUTIA Lopez, also reported in contact with the Cuban Embassy in Mexico.\n\nOn 30 Jan 1967 VILLAURRUTIA said that he had to go out of town and could not keep his appointment with Subject (1).\n55. Ralph WIEGANDT (P-2254), German who came to Mexico in 1955 and has paint factory, member of French Club.\n\nOn 13 Mar 1967 Mrs. Ruth WIEGANDT, using the familiar form of address with Subject, invited Subject and his wife to Sunday dinner (1). In April 1967 it was reported that Subject was quite friendly with the WIEGANDTS at the French Club (15).\n\n56. Douglas H. WILTSHIRE, American employed with SERVISA Travel Agency.\n\nOn 10 May 1967 WILTSHIRE planned to pick up some passports from Subject at the Soviet Embassy and mentioned that he would like to invite Subject to his house (1).\n\n57. Max Michael ZAREBSKI (P-8777, 201-744856), businessman from Cuernavaca, Canadian citizen.\n\nOn 11 Oct 1966 Subject reminded the Polish Consul, JAKOWIEC, that ZAREBSKI was going to sell some of his items to the Soviets. On 13 Oct 1966 JAKOWIEC said he could introduce Subject to ZAREBSKI, or Subject could call him directly. (1). Subject had originally met ZAREBSKI at a Polish Embassy reception on 14 Dec 1965, and they finally did get together on 12 Jan 1967. Subject asked ZAREBSKI to help the Soviets find a house for a dacha in Cuernavaca, which he eventually did. On 24 Feb 1967 Subject visited ZAREBSKI's factory and had lunch with him in Cuernavaca. On 20 May 1967 Subject and Boris Aleksandrovich CHMYKHOV visited ZAREBSKI in connection with the dacha, and on 15 Jul 1967 Subject and CHMYKHOV visited the factory. (19). (Comment: Subject and CHMYKHOV had known each other before in Cuba, and both had mostkomm responsibilities for the dacha, so their going to Cuernavaca together is not remarkable, although CHMYKHOV is a GRU officer.)\n17.\n\nOPERATIONAL PLANNING DATA:\n\na. Current Residence: Ignacio Esteva 18-1 (has lived at this address during his whole tour in Mexico) (1).\n\nb. Telephone: None at home.\n\nc. Car: 1965 green Impala, diplomatic tags 19-DA (7).\n\nd. Office: Soviet Embassy, Tacubaya 204, telephone 15-60-55 (1). Often uses one of the reception rooms near the gate (21).\n\ne. Handwriting samples attached (the one in Russian was in Subject's possession, but it is not known whether he himself actually wrote it).\n18. OPERATIONAL STEPS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN NEXT YEAR:\nThe Station is reviewing all of Subject's known contacts in a search for access agents. The case of Edmundo Fausto ZORRILLA Martinez is currently being investigated as a possible Illegals lead.\nLOGNOV handwriting sample, received 16 June 1967, from LIRENO\n\nValentin Lognov\n15.6.60-55\n\nCounsel\n\u0413\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043f\u0430 \u0412\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043d\u044f\u0437\u044f\n\n\u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0438\u044f, \u043c\u0435\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f\n\n\u043f\u0430\u043c\u044f\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432, \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0421\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043e-\u041f\u0440\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0441\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0440 \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435\n\n\u043f\u0430\u043c\u044f\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0440\u044b.\n\n\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0433\u043b\u0430\u0448\u0430\u0435\u043c \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c\n\n\u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0438\u0435\u0432 \u041f\u043e\u0441\u0430\u0434, 2020\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043d\u043a\u0442-\u041f\u0435\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0431\u0443\u0440\u0433\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0433\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0443\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\nLa iglesia y la casa de la familia\nCinco de la\n6\u00bd pu\u00f1o.\n\nSource (12)\n16. PAST OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY AGAINST SUBJECT:\n\nIn addition to routine coverage of Subject's activities in Mexico, the following has been done:\n\na. Surveillance of Subject in Panama in Dec 1961.\n\nb. In July 1966 information was passed to LITEMPO-8 \"proving\" that Subject was a dangerous KGB officer in an attempt to have him declared PNG, without success.\n\nc. LICOZY-5 continues to be debriefed on his contacts with Subject, although LICOZY-5 has told Subject he will no longer act as an agent for the Soviets.\n\nd. Briefing of U.S. Embassy chauffeur whom Subject tried to develop.\n\ne. Debriefing of LICOYL-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\nf. Station Panama City helped block visas for Subject and A.A. NIKITIN in Feb 1967.\n\ng. Risen Recruitment of Subject of 201-814144, whom Subject was cultivating. Contact now dead.\n\nh. Briefing of U.S. Embassy visa officer whom Subject tried to develop.\n\ni. Debriefing of Subject of 201-800412, who claimed Subject had tried to recruit him but who appears to be a fabricator.\n\nj. Debriefing of LITEASE-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\nk. Debriefing of LIROBBIN-1 and 2 on their contacts with Subject.\n\nl. Briefing of LIROAN-1 as access to Subject's friends at the club he belongs to.\n\nm. Direction of BESABER in his contacts with Subject.\n\nn. Debriefing of LIREALM-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\no. Debriefing of LIROCKET-1.\n\np. Debriefing of LICANNY-1.\n19. SOURCES.\n\n1. LIENVOY, passim.\n2. PACY - 7250, Dec 1961.\n3. H2PA - 11914, 11 Jan 1963, passport photograph.\n4. LIPRO Travel Report.\n5. HMA - 26881, 12 Aug 65, LITEMPO passport photograph.\n6. LIC02Y-5 case file, passim.\n7. LILYRIC & LIMITED Switzerland.\n8. LIC001-1 case file, passim.\n9. LNERGO report, 21 Dec 1965.\n10. Contract report of meeting with KADIDDLE, 28 Dec 1965.\n11. LICANNY-1 case file, passim.\n12. LNPURE memorandum, 21 Jan 1966.\n13. Station memorandum, 27 Jan 1966.\n14. LNPURE memorandum, 11 Feb 1966.\n15. LIRAN-1 information.\n16. Station memorandum, information from LITEMPO - 8, 22 Jul 1966.\n17. Summary on Subject Prepared by LIENVOY, 22 July 1966.\n18. LICALLA surveillance, passim.\n19. BESABER information.\n20. Station memorandum, 30 Jan 1967.\n21. LIROCKET-1 information.\n22. LIROBBIN-2 information.\n23. LITEASE-1 information.\n34. LNPURE memorandum, 28 Feb 1967\n35. LIRCALM information.\n36. Info from Division Subject of 201-814144.\n37. Station memo of 27 Jun 1967, info from LNPURE officer.\n38. HMPW-13950, 16 Sep 1965, HMP Times on Subject.\n39. H2PA-11859, 22 Dec 1961.\n40. Information from Subj of 201-800412.\n1. Forwarded herewith is a Personality Assessment Questionnaire on LOGINOV prepared by LIREALM-1 in February 1969.\n\n2. By virtue of membership in the same club in which they are both active participants in the same activity, LIREALM-1 has known LOGINOV for a little over two years. In this club they have several mutual contacts. As a result LIREALM-1 has met LOGINOV several times at social activities in the homes of these contacts. Although LOGINOV has never been a formal target for LIREALM-1, the relationship has been close enough and of sufficient duration for LIREALM-1 to fill out a meaningful Personality Assessment Questionnaire.\n\nFrancis C. Currie\nfor Willard C. Curtis\n\nAttachment:\nPersonality Assessment Questionnaire h/w\n\nDistribution:\n(2) C/SB w/att h/w\n2 C/WH w/o att\n1 ATT (h/w)\n\nCS COPY\n\nHMMA-36581\n25 February 1969\nSECRET\n\n201-285412\nPERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE\nPERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE\n\n1. This is a new, experimental version of the Personality Assessment Questionnaire (sometimes informally called the PRQ III) which has been in use for several years. This new form is largely a checklist and thus requires far less essay-type reporting than the previous form.\n\n2. For a number of years, our operational psychologists have been developing a system for indirect assessment of target personalities. The system employs\u2014in lieu of psychological tests and interviews\u2014observations of appearance, manner, and style of behavior. Such observations are used as if they were items in a psychological test, and like test items, are weighted and analyzed to yield a personality profile. Working from the profile, operational psychologists describe the target personality's basic aptitudes, attitudes, motives and susceptibilities. The goal of the assessment is to identify feasible means of influencing the target person.\n\n3. Reliability is vastly increased when two or more observers complete this questionnaire independently. All items need not be completed; in fact, it is a rare case where contact is sufficient to complete it fully. You are encouraged to guess where complete information is lacking. Mark such items with a \"G,\" instead of the customary check mark or \"X.\" Thus, an observer with very limited contact can be expected to enter more \"G's\" than \"X's.\"\n4. Before completing the enclosed PAQ form, please provide the following information about yourself:\n\nAge: 39  Sex: M  Nationality: US\n\nSocial-cultural background:\nMiddle-class\n\nHow often have you observed the target individual?\n3 to 4 times per month over two years\n\nWhen did you last observe the target individual?\nLast week (week of 2 Feb 1969)\n\nWhat is the nature of your contact? (direct acquaintance, embassy receptions/parties, informants, debriefing of others, etc.)\nTennis club\n\n5. Can you supply a specimen of the target individual's handwriting?\nYes  No  X\n\n6. Please supply the name(s) of any person you believe qualified to provide information about the target person, that is, anyone sufficiently knowledgeable to complete this form at least in part.\n\nGloria Pinto\nPERSONALITY ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE\n\n1. DESCRIPTION\n\n1. Overall Impression. (Check the most appropriate.)\n\n1.01 Virile, athletic, practical, and socially facile (\"Hail fellow\")\n\n1.02 Virile, rugged, practical, but socially guarded (authoritarian)\n\n1.03 Rather soft and sensuous but socially pleasant and appropriate (good guy)\n\n1.04 Rather soft and sensuous but socially guarded and moody (a possible whiner)\n\n1.05 Montly, clean-cut, professional, and socially smooth (executive type)\n\n1.06 Austere, precise, and businesslike (dedicated worker type)\n\n1.07 Cultured, neat, artistic, and socially smooth (diplomatic type)\n\n1.08 Sensitive, intense, and self-preoccupied (artistic or absent-minded professor type)\n\n1.09 None of these fit. I would describe him as:\n\n2. Dress. (Check the most appropriate.)\n\n2.01 Well-groomed (natty)\n\n2.02 Neat (well-kept)\n\n2.03 Fastidious (fussy)\n\n2.04 Overdressed (prissy)\n\n2.05 Undescript (bland)\n\n2.06 Underdressed (informal)\n\n2.07 Casual (indifferent)\n2.03 Sloppy (poorly kept)\n2.09 Unkempt (bizarre)\n2.10 Style of dress\n\n2.10.01 Conventional for his culture\n2.10.02 Cosmopolitan\n2.10.03 Outdated\n2.10.04 Extreme or unique\n\n3. Head Characteristics\n\n3.01 Skull measurements:\n\n3.01.01 Side to side\nFront to back\nWide\nWide\nAverage\nAverage\nNarrow\nNarrow\n\n3.02 Forehead:\nHigh\nAverage\nLow\n\n3.03 Eyes:\nWide-set\nAverage\nClose-set\n\n3.04 Eyebrows:\n(a) Arched\n(b) Bushy\n(c) High\nAverage\nAverage\nAverage\nStraight\nSparse\nLow\n\n3.05 Is there anything about his head or head structure that requires special mention?\n\n4. General Characteristics\n\n4.01 Age, weight, height:\n\n4.01.01 How old is he? 40 \u00b1 2\n\n4.01.02 His apparent age is\nMuch younger\nAbout the same\nYounger\nOlder\nMuch older\n\n4.01.03 How tall is he? 5' 10\"\n4.01.04 Does he have a nickname: Yes ___ No X\n   If Yes, does he object to being addressed by his nickname? Yes ___ No ___\n4.01.05 Is he addressed by a diminutive? Yes X No ___\n   (Johnny, Jack, Hank, etc.)\n4.01.06 Does he have any scars or other distinguishing marks? Yes ___ No X\n   If so, please describe:\n\n4.02 Hair:\n4.02.01 Color Very light ___ Light ___ Medium X\n   Gray or white ___ Dark ___ Very dark ___\n4.02.02 Waviness Curly X Average ___ Straight ___\n4.02.03 Amount Thick ___ Average X Sparse ___\n   Balding ___ Bald ___\n4.02.04 Grooming Well-groomed ___ Unruly ___\n   Average X Unkempt ___\n4.02.05 Is there anything unusual about his hair or hair style? ___\n   If so, please describe:\n\n4.03 Eyes:\n4.03.01 Color Gray ___ Green ___ Blue ___\n   Yellowish ___ Hazel ___ Light brown ___\n   Brown ___\n4.03.02 Wears eyeglasses Always ___ To read ___ Never X\n4.03.03 Eyeglass lens\nThick ___ Average ___ Bifocal ___\n\n4.03.04 Eyeglass style\nHeavy frame ___ Rimless ___\nAverage frame ___ Contact lens ___\n\n4.03.05 Is there anything unusual about his eyes that requires special mention? If so, please describe:\n\n4.03.06 Does he take off glasses when he speaks? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.03.07 Does he use glasses to gesture? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.03.08 Does he ever wear sunglasses indoors? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.04 Complexion:\n\n4.04.01 Coloring\nRuddy ___ Dark ___ Tan ___\nLight ___ Pale ___\n\n4.04.02 Face\n(a) Scarred ___ Lined ___ Smooth ___\n(b) Beard ___ Clean-shaven ___\nMustache ___ Unshaved ___\n\n4.04.03 Describe type of mustache or beard:\n\n4.04.04 Body hair (arms, legs, chest)\nHeavy ___ Medium ___ Light ___\n\n4.04.05 Hair visible on nose?\n\n4.04.06 Hair visible on ears?\n\n4.04.07 Is there anything unusual or striking about his skin or skin coloring? If so, please describe:\n\n---\n4.05 Face:\n\n4.05.01 Expressiveness\n\nExpressive\n\nAverage\n\nInexpressive\n\nVery expressive\n\nVery inexpressive\n\n4.05.02 If expressive, is face:\n\nNatural\n\nTense\n\n4.05.03 If inexpressive, is face:\n\nRelaxed\n\nDeadpan\n\n4.05.04 In general, are facial responses:\n\nInappropriate\n\nAppropriate\n\n4.05.05 Is there anything unusual or striking about his facial expressions? If so, please describe: When tense, he arches both eyebrows and tilts his head back.\n\n4.06 Lips:\n\n4.06.01 Type\n\nProtruding\n\nPursed\n\nThin\n\nFull\n\nLoose\n\n4.06.02 Smiles\n\n(a) Spontaneously\n\nTensely\n\nMechanically\n\n(b) Very frequently\n\nFrequently\n\nAverage\n\nInfrequently\n\nNever\n\n4.06.03 Have you ever seen him smile to himself?\n\nYes\n\nNo\n\n4.06.04 If you have seen him having his picture taken, can he smile on command?\n\nYes\n\nNo\n\nOr is he wooden and rather ill-at-ease?\n\nYes\n\nNo\n\n4.06.05 If you have not seen him having his picture taken, what kind of a picture do you think he would prefer?\n\nSerious\n\nSmiling\n\n4.06.06 Is there anything about his lips or smile that is unusual or striking? If so, please describe:\n4.07 Teeth\n\n4.07.01 Shape\n   Regular X\n   Protruding\n   Average\n   Unusual\n\n4.07.02 Do you get the feeling he clenches his teeth? Yes No X\n   If Yes, under what circumstances?\n\n4.07.03 Does he have any gold teeth or unusual dental work? Yes No X\n\n4.07.04 When he smiles, does he\n   Show his teeth? Yes No X\n   Purse his lips? Yes No\n   Put hand over mouth? Yes No\n\n4.07.05 Does he put his hand over his mouth when talking?\n   Never X\n   Frequently\n   Occasionally\n   Always\n\n4.07.06 Color of teeth\n   White X\n   Dull\n   Stained\n\n4.07.07 Is there anything unusual or striking about his teeth?\n   If so, please describe:\n\n4.08 Posture:\n\n4.08.01 Straightness\n   Round-shouldered\n   Erect X\n   Slumped\n   Stiff\n\n4.08.02 Is posture maintained?\n   Consistently X\n   Variable\n\n4.08.03 Shoulders\n   Broad-shouldered X\n   Average\n   Sloping\n   Narrow\n4.08.04 Body build  Skinny ___ Average ___ Heavy X Obese ___\n\n4.08.05 When conversing, in what direction does he primarily lean in relation to the other person?  \nTowards ___ Away X Neither ___\n\n4.08.06 Does posture, when listening, differ from posture when talking?  NO  \nIf so, please describe:\n\n4.08.07 Sitting Posture  \n(a) Relaxed ___ Average ___ Stiff ___\n(b) Erect X Average ___ Slumped ___\n\n4.08.08 When in a group, is he inclined to stand still X  \nMove about in one place ___  \nLean against the wall ___  \nSit down even though others are standing ___  \nPlace his arms on others ___\n\n4.08.09 If taller than average, does he bend over to come down to the group?  Yes ___ No X\n\n4.08.10 If shorter than average, does he stand up to the group?  Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.08.11 When listening to a lecture (or watching a play or movie) does he  \nSit still, stare at the speaker X  \nMove about, fidget, change position ___\n\n4.08.12 Is there anything about his posture, carriage, or bearing that warrants special mention? If so, please describe:\n\n4.09 Hands:\n\n4.09.01 Dominance  \nRight-handed ___ Left-handed X\n\n4.09.02 Is he inclined to use his less dominant hand?  \nFrequently ___ Rarely ___  \nSometimes ___ Never X\n| Question                                                                 | Options          |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| Size of hands                                                           | Very large, Large, Average, Small, Very small |\n| His use of his hands is                                               | Graceful, Average, Awkward |\n| In normal situations, his arms hang                                   | Loose, Stiff, Average |\n| When standing (talking or listening) he has a tendency                 | To open and close his hands, Put hands in pocket, Run hand over face or hair |\n| If he puts hands in pockets, he is more likely to put them in          | Pants, Coat |\n| Nails                                                                  | Clean, not manicured, Manicured, Ragged, Dirty, Bitten |\n| If nails are bitten, to what extent?                                   | Barely, Average, Deeply |\n| Are fingers                                                            | Blunt, Average, Long |\n| Are hands                                                              | Callous, Rough, Average, Smooth, Soft |\n| In public, does he pull, rub, or pick nose                             | Rub back of neck, Run hand over face or hair, Scratch any part of his body, Pull at his clothes, Never do any of these things |\n| Does he put his arms on the table?                                     | Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never |\n| Does he put his elbows on the table?                                   | Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never |\n| When sitting at a table or desk, does he talk or listen with his head in his hands? | Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never |\n4.09.16 When talking, does he tend to\nClose his eyes ___\nPut his hand over his eyes ___\nOften ___ Sometimes ___\nRarely ___ Never ___\n\n4.09.17 If he closes or covers his eyes, is he more inclined to do it\nWhen trying to make a particular point ___\nWhen listening to someone else ___\n\n4.09.18 Does he tap fingers on table?\nNever ___ Occasionally ___ Often ___\n\n4.09.19 Is he more inclined to do this when\nTalking ___ Listening ___ Thinking ___\n\n4.09.20 Does he\nRattle change in his pocket ___\nTap with some object ___\nOften ___ Sometimes ___\nRarely ___ Never ___\n\n4.09.21 Is there anything unique about his hands or arms worthy of\nspecial mention? If so, please describe:\n\n4.10 Feet:\n\n4.10.01 Does he tend to show foot preference? Left ___ Right ___\n\n4.10.02 Does he work to keep in step when walking with someone? Yes ___\nNo ___\n\n4.10.03 Does he cross feet at ankles when seated? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.10.04 If so, which foot is over the other? Left ___ Right ___\n\n4.10.05 Does he cross legs Only when he faces in a new direction ___\nAs soon as he sits down ___\nShortly after he sits down ___\nOccasionally ___\nNever ___\n\n4.10.06 If he crosses legs, which leg is on top? Left ___ Right ___\nDepends on how he is sitting ___\n\n4.10.07 Does he change his crossed leg Depends on how he is facing\nFrequently ___ Occasionally ___ Never ___\n4.10.08 Compared to most people, does he walk\nFaster ___  Slower ___  Same speed ___\n\n4.10.09 If he is out of step with you, does he notice it and get\nin step?  Yes ___  No ___\n\n4.10.10 In conversation when he becomes intense, does he\nUncross his legs and lean forward ___\nUncross his legs and lean backward ___\nCross his legs and sit upright ___\nShift to a more erect position ___\nShift to a more relaxed position ___\nMake little change in position ___\n\n4.10.11 Are his feet\nLarge ___  Average ___  Small ___\n\n4.10.12 Are his shoes (a) Pointed ___  Average ___  Blunt ___\n(b) Highly polished ___  Average ___  Not well kept ___\n\n4.10.13 Is there anything about his feet or legs that warrants special\nmention? If so, please describe: ___\n\n4.10.14 When his legs are crossed, does he\nSit quietly ___  Move his foot ___  Swing or wiggle his leg ___\n\n4.10.15 Does he ever tap his foot?  No ___  Yes ___\n\n4.10.16 Does he swing back and forth on his\nfeet when standing and talking in a\ngroup?  Often ___  Rarely ___\nSometimes ___  Never ___\n\n4.10.17 When walking, are his steps Long ___  Normal ___  Short ___\n\n4.10.18 When he walks, do his arms\nHang loose ___  Swing with his stride ___\nSwing, but out of rhythm ___  Hang tense ___\n\n4.10.19 When he walks, do his toes\nTurn out ___  Stay straight ___  Turn in ___\n4.11 Voice:\n\n4.11.01 Is his voice pitched\nLow ___ Medium ___ High ___\n\n4.11.02 Does he speak\nQuietly ___ Average ___ Loudly ___\n\n4.11.03 In his native language, is his tone quality noticeably\nLouder ___ Quieter ___ About the same ___\n\n4.11.04 Does he have a speech impediment?\nYes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, please describe:\n\n4.12 Use of Language\n\n4.12.01 Does his native language vocabulary seem\nRich ___ Limited ___\nAverage ___ Poor ___\n\n4.12.02 In his best language, other than native, is he\nFluent ___ Barely fluent ___\nModerately fluent ___ Poor ___\n\n4.12.03 Does he pick up idioms\nQuickly ___ Slowly ___\nAverage ___ Not at all ___\n\n4.12.04 Does he learn foreign languages easily\nYes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, does he\nLearn primarily by \"feel\" and by \"trial and error\" ___\nLearn primarily from textbooks ___\n\n4.12.05 In his best second language, can he switch from his native language\nSmoothly with little hesitation ___\nEffectively with average hesitation ___\nSlowly with considerable hesitation ___\nAwkwardly with considerable embarrassment ___\n\n4.12.06 When he misuses language, does he ordinarily appear\nOblivious of it ___\nAware of, but indifferent to it ___\nAware of, and anxious about it ___\nVery aware of it and quite embarrassed ___\n4.12.07 In general, would you characterize him as\nLaconic ___ Average ___ Garrulous ___\n\n4.12.08 In ordinary conversation, does the content tend to be primarily\nPersonal ___ Impersonal ___\nInterpersonal ___ Guarded ___\n\n4.12.09 In ordinary conversation, is the content\nPrecise and to the point ___ Relevant ___\nAverage ___ To the point but rambling ___\nIrrelevant ___\n\n4.12.10 Does he\nOften discuss personal problems ___\nRarely discuss personal problems ___\n\n4.12.11 Does he use profanity in his native language?\nOccasionally ___ Frequently ___ Never ___\n\n4.12.12 Does he use profanity in an acquired language?\nOccasionally ___ Frequently ___ Never ___\n\n4.12.13 Is there anything about his manner of speech or conversational\nstyle that is unusual.\nYes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, please describe:\n\n4.13 Gestures:\n\n4.13.01 Does he gesture when he talks?\nAlways ___ Sometimes ___\nNever ___\n\n4.13.02 His most characteristic gesture is:\nPointing with finger ___\nWaving one hand ___\nSweeping both hands ___\nChopping both hands ___\n4.13.03 When he gestures, the motion is\nGraceful ___ Average ___ Mechanical ___\n\n4.13.04 When engaged in conversation, does he tense up\nOften ___ Rarely ___\nSometimes X ___ Never ___\n\n4.13.05 It is relatively easy to tell when he is really interested in a subject\nAlways X ___ Rarely ___\nSometimes ___ Never ___\n\n4.13.06 His eyes are very expressive. Always ___ Sometimes X ___ Rarely ___\n\n4.13.07 Most people would find his eyes\nBeautiful ___ Average X ___\nPleasant ___ Unpleasant ___\nSinister ___\n\n4.13.08 He maintains eye contact\nSometimes ___ Always ___ Frequently X ___\nRarely ___ Never ___\n\n4.13.09 In a group, have you ever seen him stare repeatedly at a person\nwho seemed to interest him? Often ___ Sometimes ___ Never X ___\n\n4.13.10 When he admires (follows with eyes) an attractive girl,\nhe is\nObvious ___ Average ___ Subtle X ___\nI have never seen him do it\n\nHave you ever seen him blush? Yes X ___ No ___\n\nIf Yes, describe the situation:\n\nHis political comments were successfully changed at a party. All present, including\nhimself, were embarrassed by the confrontation.\n\n4.13.11 Is there anything particularly striking and worthy of further explanation\nabout the movements he makes with his body, eyes, or head and the\nway he behaves in a group? If so, please describe:\n\nYes\n\nSee 4.05.05\n4.14 Sleep\n\n4.14.01 Does he enjoy sleep and fall off easily? Yes ___ No ___\nRead or walk to prepare himself for sleep? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.14.02 Does he rise easily? Yes ___ No ___\nPrefer to remain abed until the last moment? Yes ___ No ___\n\n4.14.03 Is he an early starter? ___\nA late starter? ___\n\n4.15 Impressions:\n\n4.15.01 To the best of your knowledge, do you think most women would find him charming pleasant average ___\nunpleasant very unpleasant ___\nsexually attractive ___\n\n4.15.02 To the best of your knowledge, do you think most men would find him charming pleasant average ___\nunpleasant very unpleasant ___\n\n4.15.03 Without prior knowledge, if you saw him on the street, would he impress you as nondescript average ___ striking ___\n\n4.15.04 Without prior knowledge and on the basis of looks alone, which of the following do you think he might be?\n\n- Peasant ___\n- Worker ___\n- Merchant ___\n- Executive ___\n- Professional ___\n- Military Officer ___\n- Artist of some type ___\n\n4.15.05 Is there anything particularly striking and worthy of further explanation about the overall impression he gives? Yes ___\nIf so, please describe:\n\nconspicuously athletic.\nlooks like boxer.\nII. BACKGROUND\n\n5. General\n\n5.01 Ethnic Background:\n\n5.01.01 Please describe his ethnic background.\n\nSlavic - blond\n\n5.01.02 How does he compare with others of this background?  \nLike most  \nA stereotype  \nNot like most  \nI would never guess his background\n\n5.02 Cultural Background:\n\n5.02.01 If he had his personal choice, do you think he is the kind of person who, living in a foreign culture would:\n\nNever change his accustomed way of living  \nMaintain his accustomed way of living but show some interest in the local culture  \nShow some interest in the local culture and adapt his ways  \nGo native if he had his chance\n\n5.02.02 Compared with his own group, he is just like all the rest of them  \nSomewhat different than most of them  \nUnique\n\n5.03 Educational Background:\n\n5.03.01 What is his educational background? Please describe:\n5.03.02 In your opinion, compared to most people in his culture with a similar background he:\n\n- Is as well-educated\n- Is better informed\n- Appears better educated than he claims\n- Appears less educated than he claims X\n- I cannot conceive of him having the background he claims\n- If you doubt his background, please comment:\n\n6. General Impression of Background (Check the most appropriate)\n\n6.01 Strong and rugged (a man's man) X\n\n6.02 Strong, rugged, but independent (a self-sufficient loner)\n\n6.03 Compassionate, sensual and understanding (a woman's man)\n\n6.04 Moody, emotional, and sometimes bitter (the \"misunderstood\" man)\n\n6.05 Forthright, intelligent, and responsible (the professional man)\n\n6.06 Proficient, intelligent, and intense (the technical man)\n\n6.07 Sensitive, cultured, and sophisticated (the \"Madison Avenue\" man)\n\n6.08 Sensitive, temperamental, and unconventional (the Bohemian man)\n\n6.09 None of these.\nI would describe him as:\nIII. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR\n\n7. General Impression. (Check the most appropriate.)\n\n7.01 The kind of a man who is usually punctual, inclined to greet everyone informally and who appears to be comfortable with himself when he enters a room.\n\n7.02 The kind of a man who is always punctual, inclined to greet everyone somewhat awkwardly and who appears to be uncomfortable when he enters a room. X\n\n7.03 The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable, who is inclined to be very warm and friendly with everyone he knows, and who appears confident when he enters a room.\n\n7.04 The kind of man who is punctual when he makes a date, but who is inclined to cancel engagements rather often, inclined to greet only those people he has met before and is somewhat retiring or standoffish when he enters a room.\n\n7.05 The kind of man who is inclined to keep you waiting but is gracious and attentive when he arrives, inclined to be precise and proper as he greets everyone and can be quite impressive when he enters a room.\n\n7.06 The kind of man who is always punctual, inclined to be very formal in his greetings and is most often stiff and unbending when he enters a room.\n\n7.07 The kind of man whose punctuality is unpredictable, who is inclined to be charming and sophisticated as he greets everyone and is quite socially poised when he enters a room.\n7.08 The kind of man who is often quite late\u2014and indifferent about it\u2014inclined to be short and curt in his greetings and is sometimes awkward when he enters a room.\n\n7.09 None of these.\nI would describe him as:\n\n8. Meeting People:\n\n8.01 When he shakes hands Does he move toward you\nor Do you most often have to move toward him\n\n8.02 When he shakes hands, is his grip\nVery firm\nFirm\nAverage\nWeak\nLimp\n\n8.03 When he shakes hands, does he\nPump your hand\nSqueeze your hand\nLet you do all the work\n\n8.04 Is there anything about the way he shakes hands worthy of special mention? If so, please describe:\n\n8.05 When he is first introduced, does he\nLook the person in the eye to whom he is being introduced\nCock his head toward the introducer but\nlook at the person to whom he is being introduced\nCock his head and look at neither\n8.06 When he first hears a name, he\n\n- Does nothing obvious to remember it\n- Repeats it as he acknowledges the introduction\n- Asks the introducer to repeat or verify it\n- Asks the person to whom he is being introduced to repeat the name\n\n8.07 If calling cards are exchanged, does he\n\n- Read the card and carefully put it away\n- Read it and stick it in his pocket\n- Carefully put it away without reading it\n- Stick it in his pocket without reading it\n\n8.08 When introducing someone, does he do so\n\n- With ease and grace\n- With some slight embarrassment or hesitation\n- With considerable awkwardness\n\n8.09 To what extent is his manner different when he is being introduced to women?\n\n- Not at all\n- Normal\n- Marked\n\n8.10 If he shows a difference, which of the following describes it?\n\n- Uses both hands when he takes her hand\n- Moves in closer when acknowledging the introduction\n- Becomes more formal and distant\n- Becomes warm and effusive\n- Becomes warm and effusive only with pretty girls\n- Is very courteous and gracious to older women\n- Varies, depending on the woman\n\nIf so, please explain:\n8.11 When introduced to a fair number of people at the same time, does he linger a bit with each person to whom he is introduced? Acknowledge the introduction quickly and wait for the next. Look toward the next person almost at the same time he is shaking hands with the person whom he has just met.\n\n8.12 In general, does he strike you as the kind of person who will:\n- Always remember a name\n- Remember names in an average manner\n- Have difficulty remembering names\n- Be very poor at remembering names\n\n8.13 Has he ever asked you to re-identify someone to whom you had previously introduced him? No ___ Yes ___\n\n9. Smoking and Eating:\n\n9.01 Smoking:\n\n9.01.01 Does he smoke?\n- Cigarettes: Regularly ___ Occasionally ___ Never ___\n- Cigars: Regularly ___ Occasionally ___ Never ___\n- Pipe: Regularly ___ Occasionally ___ Never ___\n\n9.01.02 How much does he smoke?\n- Heavy ___ Average ___ Light ___\n| Question                                                                 | Response Options |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| 9.01.03 Does he use his own lighter?                                     | Matches          |\n| 9.01.04 Is he the kind of person who is always asking for a light?       |                  |\n| 9.01.05 Does he use a holder?                                           |                  |\n| 9.01.06 Does he clip cigars?                                            |                  |\n| 9.01.07 Does he care for his pipe?                                      |                  |\n| 9.01.08 When lighting a cigarette does he obviously duck his head and cup his hands? |                  |\n| 9.01.09 Have you ever seen him hold an unlighted cigarette and wait for a pause in the conversation before lighting it? | No, Yes          |\n| 9.01.10 Have you ever seen him put a cigarette in his mouth and pause, match poised, waiting for the appropriate time to light it? | No, Yes          |\n| 9.01.11 Have you ever seen him chew on an unlighted cigar, pipe, or cigarette? | No, Yes          |\n| 9.01.12 Is he a chain smoker who lights one cigarette from another?      |                  |\n| 9.01.13 Does he smoke only after meals?                                  |                  |\n| 9.01.14 Is the presence of tobacco stain on his fingers very marked?     |                  |\n|                                                                          |                  |\n|                                                                          |                  |\n9.01.15 When smoking, does he\n(a) Allow a long ash to accumulate on his cigarette\n    Flick off ashes in a normal manner\n    Become unusually preoccupied with the ashtray\n(b) Let ashes fall to the rug\n    Cup his hand under his cigarette\n    Always use an ashtray\n\n9.01.16 Does he\n    Put out a cigarette with elaborate ashtray ritual\n    Seem to put out cigarettes in a normal manner\n    Seem careless about how he puts out a cigarette\n\n9.01.17 Does he\n    Show obvious enjoyment when smoking\n    Show average satisfaction\n    Smoke perfunctorily and mechanically\n\n9.01.18 Is he the kind of person who offers a light to others\n    Always\n    Frequently\n    Seldom\n    Never\n\n9.01.19 Is he the kind of person who\n    Will walk across a room to offer a light to a lady\n    Is conventional in how he offers a light to a lady\n    Will seldom offer a light to a lady\n\n9.01.20 To your knowledge, has he given up smoking for reasons of health?\n    Yes\n    No\n\n9.01.21 Have you ever heard him mention that he should give up smoking\n    but cannot\n    Has tried to stop but could not\n\n9.01.22 Have you ever heard him mention that he is bothered by the smell of\n    Cigars\n    Pipes\n    Cigarettes\n    Never heard him mention any of these\n\n9.01.23 Is there anything about his smoking habits that requires special\n    mention or special description? If so, please describe:\n9.02 Eating:\n\n9.02.01 Is his mode of eating Typical of most of his colleagues X\nSomewhat different than most of his colleagues\nMarkedly different than most of his colleagues\n\n9.02.02 Is he a Hearty eater X Average eater Light eater\n\n9.02.03 Is the fact that he has marked food preferences Very noticeable\nNot particularly noticeable\nNot at all noticeable\n\n9.02.04 Does he Eat with relish\nEnjoy his food in a conventional manner\nSeem indifferent to food\n\n9.02.05 Does he eat Quickly X Average Slowly\n\n9.02.06 Is he generally inclined To take second helpings\nTo take all he wants the first time around\nOften leaves some of his food untouched\n\n9.02.07 Does he Dwell on how much he misses his native foods\nShow conventional interest in local foods\nIndicate considerable interest in new and unusual foods\n\n9.02.08 (a) He does not eat while Talking Listening\n(b) He does eat while Talking X Listening\n\n9.02.09 Does he show a tendency to adapt to the table etiquette of the people with whom he is dining? Marked Average X\nMaintains his familiar style of eating at all times\n\n9.02.10 When given a chance, does he, for other than business reasons, suggest a preferred place to eat? Always Sometimes Rarely, if ever X\n\n9.02.11 When eating out It is very difficult for him to select his meal\nWaits to hear what his companion orders and orders same thing\nAlways knows what he wants very quickly\n\n9.02.12 When eating out, he is\nSomewhat extravagant when he knows you are paying\nVery cost-conscious when he knows he is paying\nVery cost-conscious no matter who is paying\nGenerally indifferent about cost no matter who is paying\n\n-23-\n9.02.13 Is he the sort of person who\nUsually wants to check the bill regardless of who is paying\nIs indifferent about the bill when someone else is paying\n\n9.02.14 When he is paying, he checks the bill\nUnobtrusively\nVery carefully (and rather obviously)\n\n9.02.15 When he pays his check, does he\nObviously count his change\nShow indifference when accepting his change\nTake his change in a normal manner\n\n9.02.16 When he deals with headwaiters, is he\nAggressive\nNormal and conventional\nSomewhat ingratiating\nBrusque\n\n9.02.17 Is he prone to complain when service does not suit him?\nTo his companion\nDirectly\nNot at all\n\n9.02.18 He handles waiters\nIn a conventional way\nOver friendly\nUnusually polite\n\n9.02.19 Is there anything about his eating habits or manners that requires\nspecial mention? If so, please describe:\n\n9.03 Overall impression of eating and smoking behavior. (Check the\nmost appropriate description.)\n\n9.03.01 A hearty eater with well-defined preferences. He eats and smokes\nwith considerable gusto but tends to be a little on the coarse and\nboorish side. It is rather easy to imagine him eating huge sand-\nwiches and drinking beer with the boys at the neighborhood bar.\n\n9.03.02 A heavy eater with limited preferences. He eats and smokes\nwith gusto but his manners are definitely coarse and boorish.\nIt is rather easy to imagine him becoming quite sharp with a\nwaiter who serves him unfamiliar food or a dish prepared in\nan unfamiliar way.\n\n9.03.03 A sensual eater who knows all the restaurants and their native\nspecialties. He is very anxious to have others try dishes he\nhas discovered. He eats with obvious pleasure, savors his\nsmokes, and though rarely gauche, he is more aware of his\nfood than his manners. It is easy to imagine him cooking and\nserving special dishes to his friends.\n9.03.04 A sensual eater who tends to eat by himself when possible. He seems to eat all types of food and has something of the air of a glutton about him. He eats with obvious pleasure, savors his smokes and afterwards will linger alone at a table with self-satisfaction. It is easy to imagine him hovering alone over the buffet at a cocktail party savoring the tidbits.\n\n9.03.05 A conventional eater who usually goes along with the crowd. He probably has food allergies that prevent him from eating certain foods. He gives the impression of enjoying smoking more than eating but his table manners are adapted to whatever situation he is in. It is easy to imagine him taking an indigestion pill in the privacy of his room.\n\n9.03.06 A conventional eater who always goes along with the crowd. He eats with little relish and rarely mentions anything about his likes or dislikes. He smokes at every opportunity, but more mechanically than with pleasure. He usually tries to adopt his manners to the situation but may be a little awkward and obvious in doing so. It is easy to imagine him grabbing a bite at a sidewalk stand at any time of day.\n\n9.03.07 A gourmet eater who has marked and varied sophisticated food tastes. Dining is quite a ritual with him, and atmosphere and service are almost as important as the food. He is graceful and cultured at table and smokes in the same manner. It is easy to imagine him dressing for dinner, enjoying fine wines and food by candlelight.\n\n9.03.08 An unconventional eater, a man who \"eats like a bird.\" He eats in a preoccupied way, obviously indifferent to his food and surroundings. It would not be surprising to learn he was a food faddist (vegetarian, health foods, etc.).\n\n9.03.09 None of these descriptions really fit. I would describe him as:\n9.04 Drinking:\n\n9.04.01 Does he drink? Not at all Average X\nA little Heavily\n\n9.04.02 Does he drink alone (solitary drinker) with others mainly for sociableness\non formal occasions only after work, at home\n\n9.04.03 Does he appear to drink primarily for the taste\nprimarily for the effect\nfor both\n\n9.04.04 His favorite drink is Beer Wine Whiskey\nVodka Gin No preference\n\n9.04.05 He prefers Cocktails Highballs Short drinks\nStraight shots\n\n9.04.06 He drinks Slowly Average X Quickly\n\n9.04.07 Does he Gulp his drink Sip his drink X\n\n9.04.08 Does he Go out of his way to get a refill\nUsually wait until asked\nAlways wait until asked X\n\n9.04.09 Attitude toward wines? Very knowledgeable\nEnjoys but not particularly knowledgeable\nIndifferent about wines\nKnows nothing, couldn't care less X\n\n9.04.10 Does he Talk at length (and obviously get pleasure from\ntalking) about his liquor preferences\nTalk about his liquor preferences no more than\nanyone else\nNever talk about his liquor preferences X\n\n9.04.11 Is he openly proud of his native drinks and does he urge others to\ntry them? Yes No X\nIs he conventionally aware of his native drinks and offer them\nwhen appropriate? Yes No\nDoes he rarely mention his native drinks and not \"push\" them?\nYes No\n9.04.12 Does he pay little attention to the drinking needs of others?\nServe drinks in a socially appropriate manner\nTend to force drinks on others\n\n9.04.13 Compared with his colleagues, what are his drinking habits?\nMarkedly different\nVery similar\nJust the same\nIf markedly different, please explain:\n\n9.04.14 When he has had a few drinks, his behavior shows\nNo noticeable change\nSome change\nA definite change\nIf a definite change, please describe:\n\n9.04.15 Does his manner of speaking change when he drinks?\nBecomes quite slurred\nShows little change\nDoes not change at all\n\n9.04.16 When he drinks, his voice becomes\nLouder\nQuieter\nNo change\n\n9.04.17 Have you ever seen him truly drunk?\nNo\nYes\nIf so, was he\nSocially active\nBoisterous\nHostile\nQuiet, withdrawn\nWell-controlled\nPoorly coordinated\nDepressed\nSexually aroused\n9.04.18 If you have not seen him drunk, would you predict that when drunk he would become\n\nVery active ___ Very passive ___\n\nVery unpleasant ___ Rather pleasant ___\n\nNever become drunk X\n\nI cannot imagine how he would act when drunk ___\n\n9.04.19 Have you ever seen him with a hangover? No ___ Yes ___\n\nIf Yes, is he the kind of person who:\n\nObviously looks hung over but functions fairly well ___\n\nLooks somewhat hung over but shows it mainly in his eyes and general manner ___\n\nObviously looks hung over and is quite vocal about how bad he feels ___\n\nDoes not look hung over in spite of what he says ___\n\n9.04.20 Is there anything special about his drinking habits that requires mention? If so, please describe:\n\n9.05 Overall impression of drinking behavior: (Check the most appropriate)\n\n9.05.01 A hearty, heavy drinker who holds his liquor well. He is always rather boisterous, and when he drinks, there is little change in behavior. ___\n\n9.05.02 A heavy drinker who often gives the impression he can drink others under the table: When he drinks, there is little change in behavior, but there is a hint that he could get quite mean if provoked. ___\n\n9.05.03 A steady drinker who obviously enjoys being \"tight.\" In a way he can be somewhat charming when drunk and can get away with a bit of the \"life of the party\" routine. ___\n\n9.05.04 A steady drinker who becomes somewhat more maudlin when drunk or tight. Tends to tell people how much he likes them and sometimes asks others whether they like him. Gives an impression that he could become quite disgusting if he got very drunk. ___\n9.05.05 A steady drinker who holds his liquor very well. He always remains quite dignified and usually maintains his poise even though others are becoming quite drunk or tight. He still remains part of the crowd, however\u2014that is, he gives few signs of being disgusted or bored.\n\n9.05.06 A light drinker who paces his drinks. He seems to drink only because it is socially necessary. As a party progresses he tends to become aloof and distant. Is likely to continue to talk about his work even when it is inappropriate.\n\n9.05.07 A light drinker who tapers off as the evening progresses. Usually manages to keep a sophisticated aloofness from others. Often singles out and associates with someone rather like himself. As the party progresses, he shows obvious distaste for anything he considers crude or boisterous. Often becomes quite sarcastic about others' behavior.\n\n9.05.08 A very light drinker who either drinks only because he has to or refuses to drink at all. Is usually not really a part of the party and is obviously annoyed when others bring him in against his wishes. Tends to be solitary and sometimes will leave unobtrusively when the opportunity presents.\n\n9.05.09 None of these descriptions really fit. I would describe him as:\n\n10. Driving and Walking\n\n10.01 Driving Behavior:\n\n10.01.01 He drives a car in an Unusually adept manner\n\nAverage or conventional manner\n\nUnusually inept manner\n\nHe does not drive\n10.01.02 He drives Very fast ____ Average ____ Very slow ____\n\n10.01.03 When he drives and talks, you get the feeling\n   He pays little attention to his driving ____\n   He pays average attention to his driving ____\n   His driving is obviously more important than his conversation ____\n\n10.01.04 Compared with his colleagues, his interest in foreign cars is\n   About the same ____ Definitely different ____\n\n10.01.05 His interest in the care and maintenance of automobiles is\n   Unusual ____ Average ____ Little or none ____\n\n10.01.06 His road courtesy is\n   Equivalent to most of his colleagues ____\n   Equivalent to the courtesy of most people I know ____\n   Unusual in that he is very courteous and cautious ____\n   Unusual in that he is rude and demanding ____\n\n10.01.07 To the best of your knowledge, he is the kind of person who\n   Can learn how to get around a strange city very quickly ____\n   Can follow a road or city map with relative ease ____\n   Gets around by asking lots of questions ____\n   Almost always depends upon others to get him where he is going ____\n\n10.01.08 When riding with someone else, is he the kind of person who is\n   very much aware of the driving and responds with the driver\u2014\n   (goes through motions of braking, braces with changing traffic)?\n   No ____ Yes ____\n\n10.01.09 When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who\n   seems to adapt to the style of driving in an average or appro-\n   priate manner?\n   No ____ Yes ____\n10.01.10 When driving with someone else, is he the kind of person who\nIs very relaxed and relatively indifferent to the driving?\n\nNo ___ Yes ___\n\n10.01.11 Is he the kind of person who\nWould never drive when drinking ___\nIs inclined to be aware when he should not drive ___\nWould always insist on driving, even when drunk ___\n\n10.01.12 Will he offer someone a lift?\nWhen it is appropriate ___\nAlmost always ___ Never ___\n\n10.01.13 Is there anything about his manner of driving that requires special\nmention? If so, please describe:\n\n10.02 Walking:\n\n10.02.01 Is he the kind of person who\nDoes a great deal of walking ___\nWalks an average amount ___\nNever walks if he can help it ___\n\n10.02.02 When he walks, his pace is\nFast ___ Average ___ Slow ___\n\n10.02.03 When you walk with him, he most often\nKeeps pace with you ___\nForces you to keep up with him ___\n\n10.02.04 When he walks, do his feet\nSwing to the right and left (outwards) ___\nMaintain a fairly parallel motion ___\nSwing inward ___\n\n10.02.05 Does he walk\nErect with head up ___\nErect with head down ___\nBent forward but eyes up ___\nBent forward with eyes down ___\nIn a very stooped manner ___\n\n10.02.06 When he is walking, he looks around\nA great deal ___ Average ___ Never ___\n\n10.02.07 When he greets someone he knows on the street, his face\nLights up ___\nShows average or appropriate expression ___\nRarely changes expression ___\n10.02.08 Is there anything unusual or striking about his gait or manner of walking? If so, please describe:\n\n10.03 Overall impression of driving and walking behaviors\n(Check the most appropriate description.)\n\n10.03.01 An active, alert individual with a purposeful stride who appears to have a very practical mind. He enjoys \"fixing things,\" appears to have sound knowledge of automobiles, and drives in a relaxed efficient manner.\n\n10.03.02 An active individual who is somewhat standoffish (or negative) toward others. His stride is fast and intent. He appears to have a practical mind, is quite possessive and protective and is reluctant to share his possessions with others. He \"fixes things\" in a matter-of-fact way, appears to have good knowledge of automobiles, and drives in a determined (sometimes even hostile) but efficient manner.\n\n10.03.03 An active, alert individual with a free-and-easy stride who appears most of the time to be in good humor. Seldom tries to fix things, but is often quite good at getting others to fix things for him. He appears to have little knowledge of automobiles but drives in a relaxed, efficient manner.\n\n10.03.04 An active individual who has a cautious tinge to his walk as though he is easily embarrassed or easily startled. He appears rather helpless and awkward when he has to \"fix things.\" He evidently has little knowledge of automobiles and drives in a careful (sometimes tense) but efficient manner.\n\n10.03.05 A well-controlled and attentive individual who walks in something of a clipped, formal manner. Although generally practical, he seldom will do anything by \"feel.\" He must read up and prepare himself when required to \"fix things.\" He appears to have acquired considerable knowledge about automobiles but drives in a somewhat mechanical or highly controlled manner.\n\n10.03.06 A well-controlled individual who is often somewhat preoccupied even in his walk. When he takes time to \"fix things\" he does so with intensity and precision. He is often very well read about automobiles and cares for his car or sees that it is cared for meticulously. However, when involved in conver-\nsation or otherwise preoccupied, he can sometimes be quite a dangerous driver.\n\n10.03.07 A well-controlled individual who has a glide (or grace) in his walk. He has little or no interest in \"fixing things\" but usually knows the best places to get things done and is inclined to be quite particular in how things are done for him. He appears to have relatively little knowledge of the mechanics of an automobile, but appreciates and takes good care of a good automobile. He drives with confidence, but usually at a fast pace with not too much awareness of others.\n\n10.03.08 A rather nervous and temperamental person who walks rapidly and rather awkwardly. He has little or no interest in \"fixing things\" and is inclined to ignore or throw away things that do not work. He appears to have little interest in or knowledge about automobiles and his driving shows it. It is sometimes frightening to ride with him.\n\n10.03.09 None of these descriptions really fit. I would describe him as:\n\n10.04 Hobbies and Sports\n\n10.04.01 Does he have any hobbies? Yes X No Don't Know\n\nIf Yes, describe his hobbies:\n\nTennis\n\nIf No or Don't Know, what is your best guess on the hobby most likely to interest him?\n\nCan't imagine him having any kind of hobby\nCollecting (What does he collect? Guns, stamps, coins, books, butterflies, etc.)\n\nAs a collector, is he Avid ___ Moderately dedicated ___ Only casual ___\n\nArtistic (painting, ceramics, etc.) ___\nMechanical (motors, hi-fi building, etc.) ___\nSkill (woodworking, model building, etc.) ___\nIntellectual (special periods in history, philosophy, etc.) ___\nActive (group dancing, such light sports as ping pong, bowling or volleyball) ___\nOutdoor (hunting, fishing, golf, etc.) ___\nSocial (chess, poker, bridge, etc.) ___\nVicarious (listening to music, attending plays, ball games, etc.) ___\nMental amusement (crossword puzzles, anagrams, cryptograms) ___\n\n10.04.02 Has he ever mentioned having had hobbies in the past? Yes ___ No ___\n\nIf Yes, give details:\n\n10.04.03 How well does he dance? unusually good ___ good ___ average ___\npoor ___ does not dance ___ do not know if he dances ___\n\n10.04.04 Describe the kind of dancing you have seen him do:\n\nFox trot, cumbias\n10.04.05 Does he play chess? Yes \u2611 No \u2610\n   If Yes, do you know he is good \u2610 believe he is probably good \u2610\n   know he is an average player \u2610 believe he is probably average \u2610\n   know he is a poor player \u2610 believe he is probably a poor player \u2612\n\n10.04.06 If you are a poker player, describe the kind of poker player you think he would be:\n   Fair \u2610\n\n10.04.07 Is he the kind of person with whom you would like to play poker? Yes \u2610 No \u2611\n   If No, explain:\n\n10.04.08 Have you heard him sing? Yes \u2612 No \u2610\n   If Yes, is his voice good \u2610 average \u2610 poor \u2612\n\n10.04.09 Does he seem to know many songs? Yes \u2610 No \u2612\n\n10.04.10 In group singing, does he often lead off with a song \u2610 sometimes lead off with a song \u2610 always follow someone else's lead \u2612\n\n10.04.11 Does he play a musical instrument? Yes \u2610 No \u2612\n   If Yes, which instrument:\n\n10.04.12 Has he ever mentioned having played an instrument? Yes \u2610 No \u2612\n   If Yes, give details:\n\n10.04.13 Does he participate in an active sports? Yes \u2612 No \u2610\n   If yes, describe:\n   Tennis, embassy volleyball\nIf No, what is your guess regarding the kind of sport that would interest him most:\n\n- He definitely is not the sports type\n- Body contact sports (football, rugby, soccer, etc.)\n- Skill sports (tennis, handball, volleyball, etc.)\n- Individual skill sports (swimming, archery, skeet, etc.)\n\nHe is likely to be interested in all kinds of sports.\n\n10.04.14 Does he play golf? Yes ___ No X\nIf Yes, does he take golf very seriously ___ take golf in an average way ___ take golf indifferently ___\n\n10.04.15 As a golfer, do you know he is good ___ believe he is probably good ___\nknow he is an average player ___ believe he is probably average ___\nknow he is a poor player ___ believe he is probably a poor player ___\n\n10.04.16 If you are a golfer, is he the kind of person you would like to play with? Yes ___ No ___\nIf No, explain:\n\n10.04.17 Does he: hunt a great deal ___ fish a great deal ___ do some hunting ___\ndo some fishing ___ never hunt ___ never go fishing ___\n\n10.04.18 Do you have information on how seriously he takes hunting or fishing? Yes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, explain:\n\n10.04.19 Has he ever mentioned participating in sports in the past? Yes X No ___\nIf Yes, give details (include any mention he may have made of medals, trophies, team membership, etc.):\n\nBoxing\n10.04.20 Have you ever heard anyone describe him as an athlete? Yes X No __\nIf Yes, give details:\n\n10.04.21 Is he the kind of person who: X is very much preoccupied with keeping in shape\nworks at keeping in shape to an average degree\nshows little interest in keeping in shape\n\n10.04.22 Has he ever indicated an interest in weight lifting? Yes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, explain:\n\n10.04.23 He is best described as: a muscular, athletic type X a strong, well-built type ___ a somewhat flabby type ___ a flabby, unathletic type ___ an effeminate type ___\n\n10.04.24 Is he mechanically inclined? Yes ___ No ___\nIf Yes, does he\nPrefer to follow instructions in books\nIgnore instructions and try to figure it out for himself\n\n10.04.25 If it were possible to provide American magazines or periodicals for him, which of the following do you think he would really enjoy:\nThe New York Times ___ Saturday Review ___ Newsweek ___\nPlayboy X Sports Illustrated X Life ___ Atlantic ___\nField and Stream ___ Popular Mechanics ___ New Republic ___\nBetter Homes and Gardens ___ Readers Digest ___\nKenyon Review ___ Ramparts ___ Scientific American ___\nChristian Science Monitor ___\n\nCan't imagine him reading an American magazine ___\n10.04.26 What books, if any, have you heard him mention as having read and enjoyed?\n\n10.04.27 What movies, if any, have you heard him mention as having seen and enjoyed?\n\n10.04.28 If he had his choice, would he most likely attend:\n   a movie ___ the theater ___ the ballet ___\n   a soccer match ___ a bull fight ___ a concert ___\n\n10.05 Office Behavior\n\n10.05.01 General Information (Check where applicable)\n\n| Informal | Delegates work |\n|----------|----------------|\n| Formal   | Can't delegate |\n| Follower of rules and regulations | Productive |\n| An innovator | Thinker type |\n| Doer | Organized |\n| Practical | Disorganized |\n| Procrastinator | Feels work is not appreciated |\n| Big memo writer | |\n\n10.05.02 Reaction of Other Workers\n\n| Subordinates | Yes | No | Don't Know |\n|--------------|-----|----|------------|\n| Like him     |     |    |            |\n| Dislike him  |     |    |            |\n| He is courteous to them |     |    |            |\n| Worries about them |     |    |            |\n| Couldn't care less |     |    |            |\n| They fear him |     |    |            |\n| Believe he is just |     |    |            |\n| He takes credit for their work |     |    |            |\n| Gives credit where due |     |    |            |\n| See him socially |     |    |            |\nSuperiors\nTrust his judgment\nLike him\nDislike him\nDelegate responsibility to him\nSee him socially\n\nIV. EMOTIONAL SET\n\n11. Temperament and Humor\n\n11.01 Temperaments\n\n11.01.01 In his relations with others would you consider him\n\n- Shy\n- Guarded X\n- Conventional and correct\n- Outgoing\n- Warm\n\n11.01.02 Is his conversational style\n\n- Awkward\n- Hesitant X\n- Comfortable\n- Easy\n- Contrived\n- Conventional\n- Voluble\n\n11.01.03 His manner of relating to women is\n\n- About the same as with men\n- More correct and controlled than with men\n- More warm and relaxed than with men X\n\n11.01.04 In general, do you think he is a person who\n\n- Loses his temper easily\n- Has a quick temper but holds it well\n- Has a normal temper X\n- Has an even temper and is rarely ruffled\n- Has an unusual amount of tolerance and would almost never lose his temper\n\n11.01.05 Have you ever seen him lose his temper? No Yes\n\nIf Yes, give a short description of the incident, including how he reacted.\n11.02 Humor:\n\n11.02.01 Is he a person whom you: Have never seen tease anyone\nHave frequently seen tease someone\nCannot imagine ever teasing anyone\nConsider his tendency to tease like that of most people\n\n11.02.02 Is he a person: Who obviously cannot take teasing\nWhom most people enjoy teasing\nWhom most people would never consider teasing\nWho obviously likes to be teased\n\n11.02.03 His sense of humor is: About like that of most people\nNotably absent\nClever\nSubtle\nDry\nHeavy\nCrude\n\n11.02.04 Does he tell jokes and anecdotes?\nNever\nSometimes\nFrequently\n\n11.02.05 As a story teller, he is: Very good\nAverage\nPoor\n\n11.02.06 Is he more inclined to tell a story: To a group of people\nQuietly to a friend or acquaintance\nOnly when encouraged\n\n11.03 Overall impression of temperament and sense of humor:\n(Check the most appropriate description.)\n\n11.03.01 He is a hearty, rollicking fellow who laughs with gusto and pleasure. His humor is forthright, not subtle, and although he is sometimes loud, he is rarely unpleasant or objectionable. Most of the time, his good humor is contagious.\n\n11.03.02 He is a hearty fellow who, when he laughs, does so with considerable gusto. However, he is frequently dour and sometimes intolerant and somewhat humorless. His humor is direct, even crude, and at times, inappropriate. He tends to be the kind of person who laughs more at people than with people.\n11.03.03 He is a good-humored fellow who sometimes can be considered jolly and carefree. His humor is clever and well timed. He is quite sensitive to the moods and feelings of others and often can do a good job appropriately livening up a party. Although something of a tease, he is never cruel or insensitive.\n\n11.03.04 He is generally a rather quiet and somewhat complacent person who, at times, can be surprisingly gay and carefree. However, when gay, he sometimes overdoes it and causes some strain for those around him. His humor is often clever but he can be quite sarcastic and even biting on occasion.\n\n11.03.05 He is an urbane fellow, generally quite conventional and appropriate. He does not necessarily appear to be a humorless person, but he seldom displays his sense of humor. It is sometimes difficult to tell whether he is in a good humor, because of the way he covers or controls his feelings. His humor is more studied than spontaneous yet it is never crude or inappropriate.\n\n11.03.06 He is a dour and humorless person, always serious and intense. It is difficult to joke around him partly because he is not responsive and partly because he seems to disapprove.\n\n11.03.07 He is a sensitive, sophisticated fellow with a subtle wit. He can be quite charming and amusing in the right sort of setting. However, there is something of an aristocratic quality to his sense of humor and he can be quite condescending towards people who do not understand or appreciate his sense of humor.\n\n11.03.08 He is an arty, somewhat cynical person who can be quite flippant at times. His humor tends to be a bit far out. He seems to have private jokes he shares with intimates. It is sometimes difficult to tell whether he is being amusing or subtly hostile.\n\n11.03.09 None of these fit. I would describe him as:\n12. Sexual Attitudes\n\n12.01 Generals\n\n12.01.01 Are his attitudes about sex\n\n- Very obscure\n- Difficult to determine\n- About average for his culture and background\n- Clearly uninterested\n- Indifferent\n- Clearly interested\n\n12.01.02 In the presence of women, he is\n\n- Stilted\n- Conventional\n- Flirtatious\n- Vulgar\n- Hostile\n- Indifferent\n\n12.01.03 Does he go to \"girlie\" shows\n\n- Often\n- Never\n- Sometimes with a group\n- Can't imagine him ever going\n- I have no idea what he thinks of \"girlie\" shows\n\n12.01.04 Does he, in the presence of male companions, talk about sex?\n\n- Often\n- Sometimes\n- Rarely\n- Never\n\n12.01.05 Is there any change in his sexual behavior and/or attitudes, after he has been drinking?\n\n- Yes\n- No\n- Have no idea\n\nIf Yes, describe the change:\n12.01.06 Do you have any idea how he feels about prostitutes? Yes ___\nNo ___\n\n12.01.07 If No, do you think he is the type who would go to a prostitute\nCannot imagine him visiting a prostitute ___\nHave nothing to base an opinion on ___\n\n12.01.08 If Yes, is he\nObviously negativistic toward prostitutes ___\nIndifferent toward prostitutes ___\nInterested in prostitutes ___\n\n12.01.09 In his relations with women, does he\nGenerally act in accordance with his age and experience ___\nGenerally act somewhat immature and inappropriate for his age and experience ___\nShow considerable facility and poise ___\nShow considerable uneasiness or awkwardness ___\n\n12.01.10 In describing an attractive woman, is he most likely to mention\nHer hair ___ Breasts ___\nEyes ___ Clothes ___\nFigure ___ Personality ___\nLegs ___ Have no idea ___\n\n12.01.11 Have you ever heard him described in any way by a woman? Yes ___\nIf Yes, what did she say? No ___\n\nathletic, virile, manly.\n\n12.02 Overall impression: Which of the following best describes him?\n\n12.02.01 He is an earthy, lusty man who shows little embarrassment about sex. He treats women appropriately, but makes little effort to conceal his admiration and attraction. He appears virile and self-confident with women, and most women seem to like it. ___\n\n12.02.02 He is an earthy, lusty man who on occasion can be crude or even vulgar. He treats women rather harshly, and can become quite pushy when attracted to a woman. He seems to be very proud of his virility. Many women would be offended or rebuffed by his aggressiveness, but this does not seem to bother him. ___\n12.02.03 He is a somewhat sensual, rather soft man who is very considerate of women. He is prone to hold a woman's hand overly long when talking to her and frequently puts his arms around women he admires. He often uses flattery and compliments but does so rather graciously. Most women usually like his attentiveness.\n\n12.02.04 He is a sensual person, but is embarrassed and insecure about it. He is a rather soft man who tries hard to be inoffensive. However, he will frequently follow attractive women with his eyes when he thinks no one is looking. He is also prone to brush against or touch women \"accidentally\" whenever he gets a chance.\n\n12.02.05 He is a self-confident, rather polished person who is proper and conventional with either men or women. He is always considerate and polite with all women and it is difficult to ascertain what his sexual attitudes and interests might be. In a group, he always behaves according to protocol and usually can be quite efficient in doing so.\n\n12.02.06 He is a self-confident and precise person who has something of the air of a professional man about him. He is polite, almost to a fault, and is inclined to go out of his way to light a woman's cigarette or see that she is properly taken care of. Nevertheless, he shows considerable distance in his relations with women. Sometimes his formality is out of place, but he will rarely, if ever, change his manners or procedures to fit the situation.\n\n12.02.07 He is a charming, urbane person and both friendly and sophisticated. He deals with women in a cultured way but shows little sensuality or sexual inappropriateness. He is neat, even dapper, and can be quite fastidious. Most of his relations with women appear to be quite platonic. He is the kind of person who likely has several very close friends who are women.\n\n12.02.08 He is a somewhat shy and indifferent person whom some people consider odd or unusual. He shows little or no interest in women in public. In general, he is a preoccupied person who only seeks out people with similar interests. There is an ascetic, asexual air about him most of the time.\n\n12.02.09 None of these fit. I would describe him as:\nV. FAMILY SET\n\n13. Marital Status\n\n13.01 Is he married? Yes X No\n\n13.01.01 Is his wife with him? Yes X No\n\n13.01.02 Does his wife go out socially with him:\n   Never ___ Seldom X Average ___ Often ___\n\n13.01.03 Is his wife: older than he ___ about his age ___\n   younger than he ___ can't tell ___\n\n13.01.04 Is his wife: unusually attractive ___ attractive to an average degree X\n   unusually unattractive ___\n\n13.01.05 Generally speaking, is his wife: socially poised ___\n   socially adequate X\n   socially gauche ___\n\n13.01.06 What languages other than her native language does his wife speak? Spanish\n\n13.01.07 Is his wife: better educated than he X less educated ___\n\n13.01.08 Has he been married before:\n   Yes ___ No ___ Can't tell X\n\n13.02 Does his wife seem to: have many friends ___ a few friends ___\n   almost no friends X\n\n13.02.01 In public, is he: very attentive to his wife ___\n   appropriately attentive to his wife ___\n   indifferent towards his wife ___\n\n13.02.02 In public, is his wife: very attentive to him ___\n   appropriately attentive to him ___\n   indifferent to him ___\n\n13.02.03 Would you characterize his wife as:\n   aggressive ___ domineering ___ Independent ___\n   complacent ___ submissive X dependent ___\n13.02.04 In the area in which she lives, does she appear to be:\nvery satisfied _____ normally satisfied X very dissatisfied _____\n\n13.03 Have you been to their home? Yes _____ No X\nIf Yes, how often?\n\n13.03.01 Are their living quarters: unusually nice for the area _____\ntypical of the area _____ unusually poor for the area _____\n\n13.03.02 Are they, as a couple: unusually good hosts _____ good hosts _____\nadequate hosts _____ somewhat inadequate hosts _____\nunusually poor hosts _____\n\n13.03.03 Does the wife seem: very comfortable as a hostess _____\nadequate as a hostess _____ somewhat tense as a hostess _____\nvery uncomfortable as a hostess _____\n\n13.03.04 Are their living quarters: a reflection of his personality _____\na reflection of both their personalities _____\na reflection of neither of their personalities _____\n\n13.03.05 In general, their furnishings are: unusually drab _____\nconventional _____ Unusually nice _____\n\n13.03.06 Is his wife: obviously very interested in her home _____\nabout as interested in her home as most women in the area _____\nobviously very uninterested in her home _____\ncannot really tell whether she is interested or not _____\n\n13.03.07 Is her social behavior at home:\nabout the same as when away from home _____\nmore comfortable than away from home _____\nless comfortable _____\n\n13.03.08 Under ordinary circumstances, are they:\nthe kind of people who entertain often and like it _____\nthe kind of people who meet their social obligations and rather enjoy it _____\nthe kind of people who enjoy entertaining only close friends _____\nthe kind of people who entertain only when they have to _____\nthe kind of people who really dislike to entertain _____\n\n13.04 Does he ever criticize his wife: Yes _____ No _____\nIf so, what is he most likely to criticize:\n13.04.01 In general, as a couple are they: obviously very compatible\nas compatible as: not: obviously not very compatible\n\n13.04.02 Is he inclined to: never appear jealous of her\nrarely appear jealous of her\noften appear jealous of her\n\n13.04.03 Is she inclined to: never appear jealous of him\nrarely appear jealous of him\noften appear jealous of him\n\n13.04.04 Is there anything about his wife that deserves special mention or\ndescription?\n\n13.05 As a husband, he is best described as:\n\n- An outgoing man who obviously is the dominant partner in the\n  marriage. He is protective of his wife and always includes her\n  when possible in his social activities.\n- An active man who is authoritarian and dominant as a husband.\n  He is possessive of his wife and tends to be demanding in their\n  relationship.\n- An outgoing man who is quite dependent upon his wife. She\n  tends to be the more dominant partner and he seems to like it and\n  expect it.\n- An active but somewhat surly man who is obviously very dependent\n  upon his wife but will rarely admit it. He may have some tendency\n  to be jealous and possessive about his wife.\n- A conventional husband who treats his wife with respect. He\n  rarely shows his feelings in public. It is difficult to tell how he\n  really feels about her.\n- A conscientious husband who takes his marriage quite seriously.\n  His wife is obviously part of the team and they both take family\n  and social responsibilities seriously.\n- A socially active man who can be quite charming with the ladies\n  even when his wife is present. They both seem to lead separate\n  but quite compatible lives.\n- A quiet man who is obviously very dependent upon his wife.\n  She looks after him rather unostentatiously but it is obvious that\n  she has considerable influence on his behavior and attitudes.\n\nX None of these fit, he is best described as:\n\ndominant partner, independent of\nwife. Indifferent to here needs\n13.06 Household:\nIs he concerned about the appearance or functioning of the household? Yes No\nDoes he make minor repairs himself? Yes No\nIf Yes, fairly competently Awkwardly\n\n14. Children\n14.01 Does he have any children? Yes X No\n14.01.01 How many? What ages 10-18 Sex of children male + female\n14.01.02 Are all the children with him? Yes No X\nIf not, where are they? girl / moscow\n\n14.01.03 Does he: pay unusual attention to his children X\npay normal attention to his children\npay little attention to his children\n14.01.04 Is his wife: an unusually attentive mother X\nan average mother\nan unusually unattentive mother\n14.01.05 Are the children: unusually well behaved X\nnormally well behaved\nunusually rowdy or difficult\n\n14.01.06 Does he: never talk about his children rarely talk about his children X\ntalk about his children as normal and appropriate\nfrequently talk about his children\nseem quite preoccupied about his children\n\n14.01.07 Are any of his children unusual in any way (frequent illness, allergies, mentally defective, crippled or deformed, unusually bright, etc.) Yes No X\nIf yes, describe circumstances:\n14.02 When his wife and family are away, he is:\n   obviously very lonely and at loose ends\n   unlikely to vary his routine\n   likely to become more active and socially aggressive\n   have no idea\n\n14.03 As a father, he is best described as:\n   An active, happy family man who is proud of his family.\n   An active family man who is inclined to be strict and\n   demanding with his children.\n   An active family man who spends a great deal of time with his\n   family. He tends to spoil his children.\n   An active but insecure family man who worries a good deal\n   about his children.\n   An active, responsible father, but has a no-nonsense attitude.\n   His work comes first and his family knows it.\n   A careful, responsible father who is conscientious about his\n   family but not particularly warm or demonstrative.\n   A carefree father who takes his family for granted. Most of the\n   time they fend for themselves and do a pretty good job of it.\n   An indifferent father, who sometimes seems oblivious of his\n   family.\n   None of these fit, he is best described as:\n\n14.04 Does he carry pictures of his family\n   wife\n   children\n   himself\n\n14.05 In his office or room, does he display pictures of his family\n   wife\n   children\n   himself\n\n14.06 Is there anything about his relations with wife or family that requires\n   special mention or description?\nVI. IDEOLOGICAL SET\n\n15. General\n\n15.01 In general:\n\nHe is a man with forthright and obvious opinions. He is capable of expressing these opinions with little apparent regard for the feelings and attitudes of others.\n\nHe is a man with many prejudices and dogmatic ideas. He can express them with heat and determination when necessary.\n\nHe is a man who is likely to turn aside controversial opinions with flippancy or humor. It is sometimes difficult to determine his opinions because it is hard to get him really serious.\n\nHe is a man who may have many strong opinions but it is difficult for him to show them. He is apologetic, diffident and often uncomfortable when an argument is in the offing.\n\nHe is a man whose true opinions are difficult to determine. He is usually diplomatic and conventional when controversial subjects or taboo subjects are discussed.\n\nHe is a man who is serious and determined to be proper and conventional. He has the manner of a well disciplined person who only says what he is supposed to say or expected to say.\n\nHe is a man who has quite sophisticated opinions. He is well read, capable of considerable articulate argument, but at times can be quite cynical or subtly sarcastic.\n\nHe is a man who is shy or taciturn about his opinions. It is very hard to get him to open up on any subject, particularly if it is controversial.\n\nNone of these fit, he is best described as:\n15.01.01 Is there any subject that tends to get his dander up? Yes ___ No ___\nIf so, what is it?\n\n15.02 Is he a man whose patriotism:\n   is obvious and intense\n   is like that of most of his colleagues\n   is guarded and not too intense\n   is difficult to determine\n\n15.02.01 On general political issues, is he:\n   unusually well informed on his country's position and attitudes\n   as informed as most of his colleagues\n   unusually poorly informed\nVII. MEDICAL\n\n16. State of Health:\n\n16.01 To your knowledge, does he have any sort of health problem?  \nYes ___ No X\n\nIf Yes, please explain:\n\n16.02 Does his wife or children have any sort of health problem?  \nYes X No ___\n\nIf Yes, please explain:  \nwife = ?\n\n16.03 Has he ever indicated that he had health problems in the past?  \nYes ___ No X\n\nIf Yes, please explain:\n\n16.04 To your knowledge, does he regularly take pills or medication of any kind?  \nYes ___ No X\n\nIf Yes, please explain:\n\n16.05 Is he the kind of person who:  \nNever talks about his health or how he feels ___  \nTalks about his health and feelings to an average degree X  \nFrequently talks about his health and feelings ___\n\n16.06 When he feels bad:  \nIt is obvious to others ___  \nIt is obvious to an average degree ___  \nMost people would never know if X  \nHave never known him to feel bad ___\n16.07 In appearance, he looks Robust and healthy X Essentially like most people his age ___ Unhealthy ___\n\n16.08 Does he have A flushed face ___ A pot belly ___ A tendency to breathe hard with exertion ___ Cold clammy hands ___ A tendency to sweat to any unusual degree ___ Foul breath ___\n\n16.09 To your knowledge, does he adhere to a special diet or health regimen? Yes ___ No ___\n\nIf Yes, please explain:\n\n16.10 As an overall impression, does he strike you as a person who is Highly energetic and tireless X Energetic, but in spurts ___ Moderately energetic ___ Lethargic, listless ___\n\n16.11 Is there anything about the state of his health or his family's health that warrants further comment?\nTO: Chief, WH Division\nINFO: Chief, SB Division\nFROM: Chief of Station, Mexico City\nSUBJECT: Subject of 201-238943\n\n1. On 29 January 1969, Samuel J. KARTASUK met with Subject to deliver the recruitment pitch as advised by Refs. Subject initially refused to cooperate on the grounds that he does not want to get involved in this type of business and that he had given the same answer to \"the other side.\" He readily admitted that he has been under intensive development by Valentin LOGINOV (201-285412) to spot Mexican students who eventually may go to WOLADY; he denied, however, that he has ever accepted the money LOGINOV continually offers him. Subject volunteered that Yuriy CHERNYSH (201-825743) is currently developing one of Subject's students (which we knew), and that Subject would like to foil CHERNYSH's attempt.\n\n2. In spite of Subject's expressions of reluctance to be recruited he answered a number of questions put to him by KARTASUK and he agreed to a follow-up meeting on 7 February. At that meeting, he submitted to more intensive questioning about his background, family, and his association with the FJSTEAL community. There were no attempts at evasion and many of his answers were corroborated by information that was already known from other sources. Subject agreed to continue meeting clandestinely with KARTASUK and to provide additional information on his contacts with LOGINOV and other members of the KGB.\n\n3. Subject's activities immediately following the pitch were monitored closely by LIEMBRACE and by LIFKAT for the week between the two meetings. The second meeting was counter-surveilled with negative results. Although the recruitment is still tenuous, we believe that it can be firmly cemented and that Subject is committed whether or not he is ready to admit it to himself at this point.\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/WH\n2 - C/SB\n\nCS COPY\n\n12 February 1969\n\n201-285412\n201-825743\nValeri V. Kostikov, I have met him but I do not know him much.\n\nValentin Kostikov, in charge of consular affairs, his wife, and family. Alexandra has been an outstanding skating star, so very nice, speak very good Spanish, and fair English. Their daughter Alexandra, sixteen years old, very sophisticated, came here for a holiday. The only child of that age we have ever seen here. They have another child, who is in Moscow. Both have been at our house for a party. In general Soviet people come alone, leaving the wives behind.\n\nDmitri Prygov, wife Natalia, have a small child born here, he has been writing a book on the Mexican revolution. We are fairly good friends. He was introduced to me by Boris Kazantsev, who invited me for lunch for the occasion. Then we go to the Soviet embassy both he and Tchmykhov are always very attentive.\n\nI know several other people from the Soviet embassy but really I could place them together with their names.\n\nExtract from HMMA-36436, 12/169 (Redtop Ops)\nSECRET 300030Z JAN 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 8912\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDTOP\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 69779\n\n1. RAISA KISELNKOVA WORKS AND LIVES AT THE SOVIET COMMERCIAL OFFICE WHICH IS ALSO THE RESIDENCE OF THE COMMERCIAL COUNSELOR, VIKTOR M. IVANOV. PER LILYRIG SHE ONLY VISITS THE SOVREM ABOUT ONCE A WEEK DURING WORKING HOURS. HOWEVER, SEVEN TIMES SINCE HER ARRIVAL SHE HAS COME TO THE EMBASSY DRIVING THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE'S DUTY VEHICLE, NORMALLY DRIVEN BY THE MEXICAN CHAUFFEUR. WE CONSIDER IT MOST UNUSUAL FOR A SECRETARY TO DRIVE.\n\n2. SHE SPEAKS GOOD SPANISH AND INvariably KNOWS MEXICAN CALLERS AND THEIR BUSINESS AT THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE. SHE USUALLY HAS IMMEDIATE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS INCLUDING ADDRESSES OF VARIOUS SOVIET TRADE ORGANIZATIONS IN THE USSR. WITH SOVIETS SHE IS USUALLY PLEASANT BUT IS CIVIL AND SHARP WITH ANYONE WHO MEXICO CONTACTS OF THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE HAVE ASKED HER TO PUSH HER AROUND. TWO MEXICAN CONTACTS OF THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE HAVE ASKED HER TO MEET THEM FOR DATES. SHE REFUSED THEM BOTH. ONE PERSISTED WITH SEVERAL CALLS. SHE FINALLY TOLD HIM SHE PREFERRED TO SPEND HER TIME WITH HER SOVIET FRIENDS.\n\nA FEW OF THE SOVIET MALES, PARTICULARLY VALENTIN S. LOGINOV, FLIRT\n\nSECRET 301 585412\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 8912 SECRET\n\nWITH HER WHEN CALLING FOR OTHER PURPOSES. SHE IS PLEASANT BUT UNENCOURAGING. SHE DOES NOT TALK WITH THE OTHER FEMALE SECRETARY, LYUDMILLA SHAPOVALOVA WHICH IS UNUSUAL SINCE THE TWO FEMALE SECRETARIES HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN FRIENDS. SHAPOVALOVA WAS VERY FRIENDLY WITH KISELNIKOV'S PREDECESSOR. HER ONLY CONVERSATION WITH ANOTHER SOVIET, OTHER THAN ROUTINE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS, WAS TO MAKE A DATE WITH THE WIFE OF THE COOK, ALEKSEY M. KUZNETSOV, TO GO TO THE MOVIES ONCE. THERE IS NO Gossip ABOUT HER AMONG SOVIET WIVES.\n\nSOURCE: LIENVOY AND LIFEAT.\n\n3. SHE IS FAIRLY ATTRACTIVE WITH A STATUESQUE FIGURE WHICH EXPLAINS WHY MEXICANS WOULD WANT DATES AND LOGINOV FLIRTS WITH HER.\n\n4. PER CURRENT INFO ONLY ACCESS TO HER WOULD BE LEGITIMATE CONTINUOUS VISITOR TO COMMERCIAL OFFICE WHICH IS NOT ENCOURAGING SINCE THEY HAVE ALREADY STRUCK OUT. SINCE CURRENT ASSETS TELL US NOTHING ABOUT HER CONTACTS OR PERSONAL LIFE, STATION WILL PUT SPORADIC LIEMBRACE COVERAGE ON COMMERCIAL OFFICE AFTER WORKING HOURS IN ATTEMPT TO DETERMINE HER ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE WORK. HOWEVER, SINCE OFFICE IS ON QUIET STREET WITH SOVIET SCHOOL NEXT DOOR AND SEVERAL SOVIET FAMILIES IN NEIGHBORHOOD, LIEMBRACE COVERAGE CANNOT BE CONTINUOUS.\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 8912 SECRET\n\n5. FILE: 201-835670.\nSECRET - SVCID for possible missing portion.\n\nKARAKASEVIC\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n31 Dec 68\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nREDCOAT\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 8545 (IN 61160)*\n\n1. SUBJECT'S LONG RESIDENCE IN SOVIET UNION AND CLOSE CONTACT WITH SOVIET OFFICIALS CONSTITUTES UNRESOLVED DEROGATORY INFORMATION AND IS DISQUALIFYING FOR COVER PURPOSES.\n\n2. IT IS REQUESTED THAT DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT BE CONTINUED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF CSI-F 10-5, PARA 18, WHICH PROVIDES FOR USE AS HOSTILE UNTIL BONA FIDES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED THROUGH FURTHER ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE. REQUEST IROUNESS REPORTING ON DEVELOPMENTS ON THESE ASPECTS.\n\n3. SUGGEST THESE CONSIDERATIONS BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN FUTURE AS STATION PURSUES ITS PROGRAM OF EXPANSION OF ACCESS AGENTS.\n\n4. FILE: 201-238943 AND 201-285412.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nWH COMMENT: *Priority POA requested in order to permit continued development toward recruitment. Subject is being considered for use as access agent to Valentin LOGINOV, Soviet Embassy Officer and known member of KGB.\n\nWILLIAM V. BROE\nC/WHD\n\nCI/OPS/WH\n\nW. V. KAUFM\nC/WH/2\n\nRELEASING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 262202Z DEC 68 CITE MEXICO CITY 8545\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\nREFS A. HMMA 35717\nB. MEXICO CITY 3281 (~46766)\nC. HMMA 36050\n\n1. REQUEST HQS EXPEDITE PRIORITY POA FOR SUBJECT 201-238943 PER REF A AND B.\n\n2. LIOVAL-1 ADVISES SUBJECT RAPIDLY APPROACHING MARTIAL CRISIS REPORTED REF C. STATION WOULD LIKE TO REINTRODUCE SAMUEL J. KARTASUK FOR RECRUITMENT ATTEMPT BEFORE HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH SUBJECT COOLS AND TO TAKE ADVANTAGE PSYCHOLOGICAL LOW POINT WHICH SHOULD APPEAR ON LIFEAT.\n\n3. FILE: 201-238943 AND 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\n\n[Signature]\nDISPATCH\n\nSECRET\n\nTO\nChief, WH Division\n\nFROM\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nSUBJECT\nRafael VIDIKLLA Ruiz (201-238943)\n\nACTION REQUIRED\nReferences: A. MEXICO CITY 8281.\nB. HHMA-35717, 28 October 1968\n\nSummary\n\n1. As reported by Ref A, Samuel J. KARTASUK succeeded in meeting with Subject in Acapulco and in spending nearly a full week with him for the purpose of establishing rapport and assessing him for possible recruitment per Ref B. Assessment by both KARTASUK and LIOYAL-1 indicates that Subject is essentially apolitical with attitudes as pro-West as pro-Soviet. KARTASUK believes, however, that he could be recruited to work against FJSTAL intelligence if he were made to believe that he is not working against the FJSTAL people.\n\n2. Recent LIFEAT reveals that Subject is having marital problems and that he consented to see a psychiatrist after his wife made good her threats to leave. According to Subject, he was diagnosed as \"psychopathic\" with problems stemming from his mother's possessive attitude. The character assessment by KARTASUK agrees with that of LIOYAL-1 but neither has called Subject \"psychopathic.\"\n\n3. While we recognize possible problems, we feel that a recruitment attempt should be made by KARTASUK. Following the recruitment we plan to have KARTASUK sever further relationship with Subject and to handle the case from inside where it can be monitored more closely.\n\nDistribution:\n3 - C/WH\n2 - C/BB\n\nCross Reference to\n\nHHMA-36050\n\nDate\n17 December 1968\n\nSECRET\n\n50-6-136/3 201-238943\nMeeting\n\n4. As reported previously, KARTASUK went to Acapulco in early November and succeeded in meeting Subject, whose plans for a vacation there with his family were confirmed by LIFET. The \"chance meeting\" came about naturally in the hotel lobby when Subject's precocious four year old daughter approached KARTASUK on the morning of 5 November.\n\n5. KARTASUK used an alias and played the role of a successful public relations man from WOLADY who was recently widowed. He had come to Mexico as a long-term tourist to help piece together his shattered world. There was instant rapport between KARTASUK and both Subject and his wife which permitted him to spend almost the entire week alone with them. As a result, KARTASUK got to know them intimately and to probe naturally into Subject's character, politics, and family relationship.\n\nAssessment\n\n6. To both KARTASUK and LIOVAL-1, Subject appears to be essentially political or, at least, politically naive. He expresses simultaneously admiration for both FJSTAL, where he lived for 17 years, and for WOLADY, where he would like to live. He believes that the political system in each is right for each and that neither system would work for the other. He feels that both the FJSTAL and WOLADY citizens want peace and are basically good but that both are victims of their political systems. Although Subject wanted at one time to return to FJSTAL, he knows that he has a better life in Mexico.\n\n7. Subject is an easy-going, extremely pleasant extrovert with a wide circle of friends whom he sees frequently. He has few scruples in regard to marital fidelity and, while his wife is not happy with his affairs, they have apparently arrived at some sort of working agreement on the subject.\n\n8. Subject has told both KARTASUK and LIOVAL-1 that he earns about $4000 (M) per month and is, therefore, forced to live on a modest scale. While he would like to live better, he is not ambitious and does not let work interfere with pleasure. LIOVAL-1 feels that Subject would find easy money a great temptation, that Subject could be influenced fairly easily, and that principles would not stand in his way.\n\n9. With KARTASUK, Subject spoke of his mother on several occasions. He accuses her of possessiveness and claims that it is for this reason that he rebels against anyone's possessing him, including his wife. This problem is apparently genuine as confirmed by LIFET in recent take. Subject consented to psychiatric treatment when his wife made good her threat to leave him (though she returned after several days). Per LIFET, Subject said that he has been diagnosed as psychopathic and that the psychiatrist lays the blame at his mother's feet.\n\nConclusions\n\n10. LIOVAL-1 has assessed Subject since early March 1968 and KARTASUK assessed him during a week of uninterrupted close association. Both assessments are virtually identical in all major respects. There is little doubt that Subject does, indeed, have some personality adjustment problems and that, if he is recruited, he will require firm handling. Neither KARTASUK nor LIOVAL-1, however, describes Subject as \"psychopathic.\"\n11. KARTASUK believes there is a reasonably good possibility that Subject would consent to recruitment, if the approach were made in such a way as to make him believe that he is working against FJSTEAL intelligence meddling and not against the FJSTEAL people and system. Additionally, we believe it may be possible to introduce stability into Subject's life, to give him firm direction and goals, and to turn some of his liabilities into assets.\n\n12. Following successful recruitment by KARTASUK, the case will be handled by an inside case officer so that developments can be monitored more closely through other assets and the risk reduced.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\nSECRET\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\nREF: HMMA-35717\n\n1. DURING WEEK OF 3 NOVEMBER, SAMUEL J. KARTASUK ARRANGED CHANCE MEETING IN ACAPULCO WITH SUBJECT OF REF WHOSE VACATION PLANS WERE CONFIRMED BY LIFEAT. USING ALIAS AND PLAYING ROLE OF LONG TERM WOLADY TOURIST WITH SIMILAR SPANISH BACKGROUND, KARTASUK SUCCEEDED IN ESTABLISHING SOLID FRIENDSHIP AND OBTAINED FAVORABLE PERSONAL ASSESSMENT DURING NEARLY FULL WEEK WITH SUBJECT AND WIFE.\n\n2. PLAN HAVE KARTASUK ATTEMPT TO RECRUIT SUBJECT AT FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO REPORT ON SUBJECT OF 221-285412, HIS OTHER FJSTEAL CONTACTS AND SPANISH COMMUNIST COMMUNITY IN MEXICO. FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL RECRUITMENT, CASE WILL BE HANDLED BY INSIDE CASE OFFICER.\n\n3. REQUEST STATUS OF POA FOR SUBJECT REF AND THAT IT BE HANDLED ON PRIORITY BASIS WITH CABLE NOTIFICATION TO STATION.\n\n4. FILE: 201-238943 AND 201-235412.\n\nSECRET\n1. Transmitted herewith is a report prepared by Keith R. LEVENDERIS which details how LOGINOV used Erast G. GAZIYEV (201-795374) to spot and set up a meeting for assessment purposes with Jorge ARTAS Duerba, a teacher at the Mexican North American Cultural Institute in Mexico City. The Soviets have long had an interest in the Institute and its personnel because most of newly arrived Americans study Spanish there. GAZIYEV has attended the Institute since his arrival in Mexico, first studying Spanish and then English.\n\n2. We are forwarding this report because it is a typical illustration of LOGINOV's modus operandi and because it clearly shows that GAZIYEV at least has the status of a KGB cooptee.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\n\nAttachment:\nReport\n\nDistribution:\n1 - C/SB, w/att.\n2 - C/WH, w/att.\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Jorge ARIAS Buerba\n\n1. Subject is a 26 year old Mexican citizen (although he looks to be in his 30's). He is a Spanish teacher at the Mexican-North American Institute and since the fall of 1967 has held a second job as the director of the Community Services Program at the American School. In April 1967 he married an American citizen from the Chicago area named Donna WEINTHALER (phonetic). They live at Juanacatlan 15, which is just around the corner from the Soviet Embassy. Home phone is 15-28-49.\n\n2. Subject was recommended as a Spanish tutor in August 1966 by Enrique GUTIERREZ Martinez (P-12667), who was then C/SB's Spanish tutor. GUTIERREZ was subsequently recruited by C/SB as a utility agent, but has since been dropped because he is related to other Station assets. On GUTIERREZ's recommendation, I began taking private Spanish lessons from Subject in August 1966. I found Subject an excellent teacher and continued taking lessons from him until December 1966. In March 1967, my wife and I had Subject as a teacher in Spanish courses we took at the Mexican-North American Institute. I have maintained intermittent social contact with Subject since March 1967, and my wife has become friendly with Subject's wife, having visited her at her apartment two or three times and having had her to our home during the day an equal number of times. I have also\n\nFile: 2671\n\nH/MATT #16 H/MMA-35465; but 1 CS COPT 201-2854/2\nkept informed to some extent about Subject through his younger brother, Javier ARIAS Buerba, from whom I have been taking Spanish lessons since July 1967.\n\n3. Subject was a casual contact of Station officer Olivia G. RAGNITI in 1965 and 1966. Other than a file card noting this contact, there is no station traces on either Jorge or Javier ARIAS Buerba.\n\n4. Subject and I from the beginning have had a very friendly and informal relationship. He is an intelligent person with a friendly, open personality and a good sense of humor. Politically, he is pro-American to the point that he magnifies our strengths and positive qualities and tends to minimize or overlook negative factors in our society. Subject knows I am with the Political Section of the Embassy and that I have been in the Soviet Union. We have consequently gotten onto the topic of Russians and Communism several times, and he has always come out a strong anti-Communist. He has one brother and two sisters living in the United States. The brother is married to an American and lives in Virginia, where he is in the construction business. One of the sisters is also married to an American and lives in California (I believe San Francisco). The second sister is married to a Polish immigrant and lives with him in Chicago. The sister in California is a naturalized American citizen. The brother and the sister in Chicago are not.\n\n5. On 24 April 1967, LIENVOY reported the following call from GAZIEV to LOGINOV:\n\nGAZ: \"I saw him, he arrived yesterday.\"\nLOG: \"Excellent. Then I'd like to see you to discuss certain things.\"\n\nGAZ: \"Then I can come there tomorrow?\"\n\nLOG: \"No, better Wednesday.\"\n\nGAZ: \"All right. He usually comes there at 6 o'clock. He got married and came here with his wife. Now they look for an apartment. I'll go there on the 10th, because I want to attend courses in English. This week I'll be busy.\"\n\nLOG: \"OK, until the next then.\"\n\n6. From this conversation, it appeared that GAZIYEV was probably talking about Subject, since:\n\n(a) GAZIYEV had been taking Spanish at the Mexican-North American Institute and I knew from Subject that Subject had had GAZIYEV in one of his classes, that Subject occasionally chatted with GAZIYEV after class, and that GAZIYEV had once given Subject an invitation to a Consular night at the Soviet Embassy (although Subject told me he had not gone).\n\n(b) Subject had gotten married that month.\n\n(c) Subject had just returned to Mexico with his bride.\n\n(d) Subject and his wife were looking for an apartment.\n\n(e) Subject normally arrived at the Institute at 1800 to teach evening Spanish classes.\n\n7. Prior to this reported telephone conversation, I had considered using Subject as an access agent against GAZIYEV, but had decided not to approach Subject on the matter unless there was evidence that his relationship with GAZIYEV was developing into something more than occasional chats between classes. I did not see much potential in approaching Subject before this with the idea of having him deliberately cultivate a friendship with GAZIYEV, as I felt Subject was living\nsuch a busy and hectic life that I would get very little out of him. Prior to his marriage, he was keeping such a hectic schedule between his Institute and private classes that he wasn't sleeping or eating properly and was having increasing problems with his health. If anything, his pace and health problems increased after his marriage and his taking of the job with the American School (although he gave up most of his private classes).\n\n8. Since the GAZIYEV-LOGINOV conversation made Subject's relations with the Soviets look much more interesting, I attempted to find out what I could about them from Subject. For a number of reasons, however\u2014including my going to the States in June\u2014we were not able to get together until 11 July. On that date I took Subject to a belated \"bachelor's lunch\" at a little Spanish restaurant downtown.\n\n9. The lunch was disappointing and, for me, misleading. I was certain that if given the opportunity, Subject would voluntarily tell me if his relationship with GAZIYEV had developed any further. When I casually brought the conversation around to GAZIYEV, however, Subject simply told me that GAZIYEV was still studying at the Institute and that he still occasionally chatted with him in the halls or over a cup of coffee in one of the near-by coffee shops during the 20-minute break between the two evening classes. Subject commented that he enjoyed talking with GAZIYEV, as he was a simpatico, interesting guy, as well as an outstanding Spanish student. He also added that they never talked politics. In reply to an offhand question about whether he had met any other Soviets through GAZIYEV, Subject\nsaid that he had not. My inclination was to believe Subject, and I went away thinking that either GAZIYEV and LOGINOV had been talking about someone else over the phone or that they had never gone beyond the stage of simply talking about Subject.\n\n10. On 1 November 1967, I ran into Subject and his brother Javier in Sanborns-Insurgentes. They were about to have a quick lunch and insisted that I join them for a cup of coffee. As soon as we sat down, Subject told me he had a problem and would like my advice. He said GAZIYEV had given him an invitation to the 7 November celebration of the Revolution at the Soviet Embassy, and although he would like to go for the experience, he was very concerned that his name would be put on \"the black list\" at the U.S. Embassy if he went. He said that he had tried to call me at the Embassy after he got the invitation to ask my advice, but had been told I was out of town. (I was in El Paso from 25-29 October.) He stated that if he had not been able to reach me in the next day or two, he was going to simply walk into the Embassy and ask to see someone from the \"security department\" about his predicament. What did I think he should do?\n\n11. I told Subject to relax and forget about going to the U.S. Embassy, as the Embassy would not give him any advice other than to tell him that it was entirely his own business whether he went to the Soviet reception or not. Besides, I asked, what made Subject think his name would be put on a \"black list\" if he went. Subject replied that he didn't know how the U.S. Embassy did it, but \"everyone knew\" the U.S. Embassy obtained the names of everyone who went in and out of\nthe Soviet Embassy. Moreover, he said, even if the U.S. Embassy refused to give him any advice, at least it would make a record of his visit and anyone who was ever interested would know his heart was in the right place. He simply did not want and couldn't afford to get into any trouble with the U.S. Embassy, he said. After all, he had an American wife, he might want to go to the States to study sometime, and they might even want to go to the States to live someday. Seeing that Subject was indeed very serious, I became more serious myself and told him that just so he wouldn't worry, I'd write a memo to the proper Embassy department stating for the sake of the record that Subject had told me he planned to attend a Soviet Embassy reception, but wished the U.S. Embassy to know he was doing it solely out of curiosity and was in no way in sympathy with the Soviet Union. Subject seemed greatly relieved and thanked me very much.\n\n12. Seizing of the fact that GAZIYEV had given Subject the invitation, I asked if Subject saw much of him anymore. Subject replied that yes, he still saw him occasionally, as GAZIYEV was now studying English at the Institute. Subject added, on his own initiative, that he had also been to GAZIYEV's apartment twice and had met another Soviet there on one occasion. He said that the first time he went to GAZIYEV's was shortly before he (Subject) got married (Subject was married about mid-April 1967) and the second time was shortly after his marriage, as he and his wife had gone to dinner at the GAZIYEV's. Subject finished eating about this time, and since he was in a hurry and had his brother with him, I didn't try to question him any further, but decided to wait and have a second go at him alone another\ntime.\n\n13. My wife and I entertained Subject and his wife at our home on 27 November, but the evening was not meant to and did not afford an opportunity to discuss the Soviets any further. Subject did tell me, however, that he had not gone to the 7 November Soviet reception after all, because, despite by assurances that there was no reason for him not to go, he felt it was simply safer to stay away from the Soviet Embassy altogether. At my suggestion, we agreed to get together for lunch sometime in the near future.\n\n14. For various reasons, including the poor state of Subject's health when I called him one day in January, we did not get together for the lunch until 7 March. This time, I played it straight with Subject, told him that I was interested in anything he could tell me about GAZIYEV and the other Soviet he had met, and questioned him closely regarding the details. Subject was completely cooperative, and I am satisfied he answered my questions to the best of his ability. It seemed to me, and still does, that there was only one possible reason why Subject had not told me on 11 July what he subsequently told me on 1 November (i.e., that he had been to GAZIYEV's home twice and on one occasion had met another Soviet there). This was that he felt somewhat guilty about going to GAZIYEV's and meeting the other Soviet there, and as long as I didn't push him too hard (which I didn't on 11 July), he felt more comfortable ignoring it. The reason he so readily mentioned the two visits and the other Soviet on 1 November was, I think, that he was genuinely concerned not to \"get into any trouble\" with the U.S.\nEmbassy over-attending the Soviet Embassy reception, wished to impress me with his sincerity about whose side he was on, and felt obliged to completely clear the record by mentioning the visits to GAZIYEV's home and meeting the other Soviet there.\n\n15. Subject stated that GAZIYEV had invited him to his apartment for dinner about a month before he (Subject) went to Chicago to get married. This means that the dinner took place about mid-March 1967. Subject said he had expected to find only GAZIYEV and his wife in the apartment, but that a third person was there when Subject arrived. Subject said GAZIYEV introduced the third person as Valentin \"something.\" When I asked if the last name were LOGINOV, Subject immediately reacted and said he was almost positive that was it. Subject's description of the Soviet also fit LOGINOV. GAZIYEV stated that LOGINOV was with the Embassy (Subject couldn't remember in what capacity) and described LOGINOV as a good friend. Subject said that the evening started off very casually, with LOGINOV expressing interest in the Spanish courses at the Mexican-North American Institute. LOGINOV, who Subject noted spoke almost as good Spanish as most of the Spanish teachers at the Institute, said he'd like to get a certificate in Spanish from the Institute and asked Subject if he could help him enroll, choose the best course for him to start with, etc. Subject replied that he'd be happy to, although it didn't seem to him that LOGINOV needed much instruction in Spanish. LOGINOV simply laughed this off, and it was agreed LOGINOV would drop around to the Institute sometime soon.\n\nLOGINOV, who took the lead in the conversation most of the evening, then began to ask Subject questions which left Subject\nwith \"no doubt\" that he (LOGINOV) was trying to feel Subject out on his political views. Subject said that he couldn't remember most of LOGINOV's questions, but he did recall that LOGINOV began the feeling-out procedure by asking Subject if he didn't find that the Americans were much poorer at learning Spanish than other nationalities. He also made various derogatory remarks about the extent of American influence in Mexico. Subject said that after about ten minutes, LOGINOV's purpose became so blatantly obvious, that he (Subject) stopped the conversation and told LOGINOV that before they went any farther, he thought LOGINOV should know that he was talking to someone who was \"100% capitalist,\" completely pro-American, and had absolutely no sympathy with Communism. (While this sounds awfully blunt and Subject was unquestionably trying to make himself look good in my eyes, the fact of the matter is that Subject does tend to be a bit blunt at times, and knowing his ideological leanings, I would not put it past him to have said exactly this.) Subject said that LOGINOV tried to backtrack a bit after this, but the conversation heated up again a few minutes later when Subject commented that he had a pretty good idea of what the Soviets were up to in Mexico. When LOGINOV asked what Subject meant, Subject related the story he once told me about having been in Veracruz a few years ago when a Soviet ship was actually or virtually put under arrest there. Subject told LOGINOV that \"everyone knew the ship was loaded with Communist propaganda.\"\n\n16. After about twenty minutes, according to Subject, politics were dropped and the conversation turned to more innocuous topics.\nSubject said that LOGINOV seemed somewhat irritated with him, but on the whole kept his composure very well and treated Subject politely for the two hours or less Subject remained. As Subject was leaving, LOGINOV again said he'd come by the Institute to see Subject in the near future, but he never did. One day in late 1967 Subject saw LOGINOV at the gas station on the corner of Tacubaya and Juana Catlan, and LOGINOV greeted Subject by name. However, they did not converse with each other.\n\n17. Subject said that GAZIYEV left most of the politically related part of the conversation to LOGINOV and never referred to the evening again. However, a few weeks after Subject returned to Mexico with his bride, GAZIYEV had Subject and his wife over to dinner (this would place the second dinner in about mid-May). This time GAZIYEV and his wife were the only others present, and the evening passed without any reference to politics. Subject stated that he still occasionally goes across the street for a cup of coffee with GAZIYEV between evening classes at the Institute, but that he has not been to GAZIYEV's apartment again and has never had GAZIYEV to his home.\n\n18. Although Subject was very aware that LOGINOV's purpose in meeting him was to assess his exploitability, he did not seem to fully appreciate that GAZIYEV had both fingered him for LOGINOV and set up the situation for LOGINOV to meet him. I spelled this out for Subject and also informed him that LOGINOV was an exceptionally capable Soviet intelligence officer. I also explained that it was very possible GAZIYEV was using the Institute to spot other candidates for interviews with Soviet\nintelligence officers, and questioned Subject about GAZIYEV's activities and contacts at the Institute. However, Subject said that as far as he could tell GAZIYEV pretty much stuck to himself at the Institute and did not have any particular friends there whom Subject knew about. Subject said he would keep his eyes open for the type of thing I was looking for, however, and would let me know if he came onto anything interesting. Subject also offered to \"play up to\" GAZIYEV and/or LOGINOV under my guidance if I wished, but I declined the offer with appropriate expressions of appreciation.\n\n19. The question that remains unanswered after all this is, of course, why LOGINOV and GAZIYEV were talking about Subject over the phone on 24 April 1967. According to Subject, the dinner which LOGINOV attended took place in March 1967, while LOGINOV did not attend GAZIYEV's second dinner, which took place about mid-May. Since I am satisfied Subject told me the truth, it would appear that the \"certain things\" which LOGINOV told GAZIYEV on 24 April he wished to discuss with GAZIYEV concerned how to handle Subject in the light of the LOGINOV-Subject encounter in March. Whatever LOGINOV had in mind on 24 April, it would appear that it was finally decided that GAZIYEV and his wife should simply have Subject and his wife over to a peaceful dinner in order to at least partially erase the memory of the first dinner.\n\n[Signature]\n\nSB/L\nSECRET 080010Z NOV 68 CITE MEXICO CITY 7994\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\nREFS: A. MEXICO CITY 7965 (143845.1)\n\nB. DIRECTOR 48827\n\n1. REVIEW OF LIENVOY TAPES REVEAL NAME OF SUBJECT CALLING LA PROVOROV IS DOUGLAS PATILLO. PATILLO SPEAKS GOOD SPANISH WITH DEFINITE AMERICAN ACCENT. CONVERSATIONS ARE IN SPANISH. ON 5 NOVEMBER PATILLO CALLED PROVOROV AT SOVIET EMBASSY TO ASK WHY PROVOROV HAD NOT GONE TO SEE HIM EVENING 4 NOVEMBER. PROVOROV STATED HE WOULD GO EVENING 5 NOVEMBER 68.\n\n2. LIEMBRACE SURVEILLANCE DOUGLAS PATILLO INITIATED MORNING 6 NOVEMBER. HE IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS PATILLO TO LIEMBRACE TEAM MEMBER WHO KNOCKED ON HIS DOOR LOOKING FOR SOMEONE ELSE. ON AFTERNOON 6 NOVEMBER LIEMBRACES FOLLOWED PATILLO TO SOVIET EMBASSY. PATILLO WALKED UP TO SOVIET EMBASSY AND SPOKE TO THREE SOVIETS AT GATE, ONE OF WHOM WAS VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV (KNOWN KGB). PATILLO SHOWED LOGINOV SOME PAPERS HE HAD IN HIS SUIT JACKET THEN ENTERED SOVIET EMBASSY GROUNDS AT 1311 HOURS. HE EXITED THE SOVIET EMBASSY AT 1351.\n\nSECRET\n\nLoginov\n\nProvov\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 7994 SECRET\n\nHOURS. SUBJECT THEN WALKED BACK TO THE HOTEL. VERY\nSURVEILLANCE CONSCIOUS IN AREA OF EMBASSY COMING AND GOING.\n\n3. IN 5 NOVEMBER CONVERSATION WITH PROKOROV, SUBJECT\nSTATED THAT PERHAPS HE WAS GOING TO OAXACA (CITY IN STATE\nOF OAXACA ABOUT 300 KILOMETERS SOUTH OF MEXICO CITY)\nAFTERNOON OR EVENING 6 NOVEMBER, THAT HE HAS TO LEAVE MEXICO\nCITY FOR LOS ANGELES ON MORNING OF SATURDAY, 9 NOVEMBER.\n\n4. LIEMBRACE SURVEILLANCE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL SUBJECT\nLEAVES MEXICO. LIEMBRACE PHOTOS AS WELL AS RESUME OF\nSURVEILLANCE WILL BE POUCHED HQS.\n\n5. LILYRIC PHOTOS WILL BE CHECKED FOR SOVIET EMBASSY\nVISITORS ON 6 NOVEMBER. LIENVOY TAPE WILL BE POUCHED HEAD-\nQUARTERS.\n\n6. IF LNERGO UNABLE TO RESOLVE ADDRESS REPORTED PARA\n2 RE (A) SUGGEST LNERGO COVER ALL FLIGHTS ARRIVING LOS\nANGELES FROM MEXICO CITY ON 9 NOV, DATE PATILLO SAYS HE HAS.\nTO RETURN TO LOS ANGELES. STATION WILL CABLE IMMEDIATE, IF\nABLE LEARN TRAVEL PLANS IN ADVANCE.\n\n7. PATILLO DESCRIPTION FROM LIEMBRACES CA 30 YEARS OLD,\nCA 18 CM, CA 176 LBS, REDDISH BLOND HAIR, PALE COMPLEXION,\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 7994 SECRET\n\nWEARING SUN GLASSES IN PHOTOS.\n\n8. FILE: 50-8-21\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, 5b via Chief, WH Station\n\nRE: TOP AERIAL\n\nVladimir Ivanovich Silantiev (201-776128)\n\nReference: Mexico City 0054 (IN 39508)\n\nForwarded under separate cover is a LNERGO report concerning subject. Persons mentioned by surname on page six of the report are identified at headquarters as the subjects of 201-265504, 201-132139, 201-763035 and 201-285412 respectively. Can the station identify any of the other persons mentioned on pages five and six?\n\nAmbrose T. SIEARICH\n\nAttachment:\n\nas stated u/a/c\n\nDistribution:\n\n2 - CC, Mexico City\n\nw/attachments w/ u/a/c\n\n201-132139, 201-265504, 201-763035, 201-285412\n\nHICW-10779\n\n16 October 1969\n\nSECRET\n\n201-776128\n\nInternal Dist:\n\n1 - 201-776129\n1 - 201-265504\n1 - 201-132139\n1 - 201-763035\n1 - 201-285412\n1 - SB/WH\n1 - SB/CI\n1 - C/WH/1\n\nSB/CI/K F. Walters rah 6991\n1. Headquarters has carefully considered the case of LIEML-1 from the standpoint of ramifications of the compromise of January 1963 and of his operational utilization by the Station. With regard to the compromise, Headquarters tends to believe that the damage done by that occurrence is somewhat greater than the Station estimates. It is obvious, however, that no one now or probably even in the future can arrive at a hard estimate of the degree to which LIEML-1 was blown. We can all agree and must assume that he has been compromised to some degree. The minimum degree of compromise would presumably be a listing of LIEML-1's name in local Soviet files, and presumably also in the Moscow headquarters control registry, as \"possible A. I. S.\" While such a label is unfortunate, could affect future assignments, and will limit his sphere of activity in Mexico, there remains a wide area of operations in which he can be employed. The Mexican authorities are, to the best of our knowledge, unaware of LIEML-1's activities and sponsorship. Given the improved operational security patterns and overall professional handling which must accompany LIEML-1's future use in the light of the unfortunate flap, we feel that he can continue to be of service at his present post. In spite of the obvious special need for a more careful weighing of operational risk versus gain factors (even more important here than in the case of the usual presumably \"clean\" non-official agent), we feel that neither the flap nor his LIEML-1 status should inhibit the Station in the energetic use of his not inconsiderable talents. Headquarters can appreciate the necessarily slow pace of the developmental activity to which he has been assigned, as well as the required alterations of his targets - both of which factors have been largely beyond Station control.\n\n(continued)\n2. In a written report on his visit to Mexico in December 1967, the visiting LIGLIE case officer recapitulated the Station's Operational Plan for LIREALM-1 which included the following points:\n\n   a. \"Penetration, monitoring, analysis and study of the PRI are to be LIREALM-1's first objective\"....\n\n   b. (FRADEN) \"urged LIREALM to spot and assess potential legal travellers to Cuba.\"\n\n   c. \"A strong tertiary target is the (HEPAIRY) Embassy.\"\n\n   d. \"Indonesians, Egyptians and Soviets have been discarded as targets.\"\n\nWhen talking to members of the Branch, Lewis W. BEAUCHAMP confirmed the above and said that the Station was considering giving LIREALM-1 a going Cuban operation to handle. Has he yet been assigned any contacts which bear on the Cuban target? LIREALM-1 was quoted as saying that he feels he can handle a heavier operational load, and so we are hoping that you have or will soon be able to turn over to him one or more established operations from which he can see tangible return, thus broadening his experience and increasing his self-confidence. Since LIRELIC-1 has been terminated we assume Subject is exploring new areas against the LIGLIE/LIRELIC target and we would appreciate advice on this.\n\n3. We recognize that very often one-time tasks, spotting, and research are performed by agents in the field without Headquarters' specific knowledge. Increased reporting on this kind of activity, which is valuable and necessary even though much of it may lead to dead ends, would give us a better understanding than we now have of the contribution which LIREALM-1 is making to the Station. Headquarters appreciates the operational reporting which the Station has been providing on LIREALM-1 and urges that it be continued on the same frequent basis.\n\nThomas W. LUND\nAction Required: FTI\n\n1. During the April 1968 debriefing of AMSLOUCH/1 in the JMNAV area, AMSLOUCH/1 provided the following information on Soviet officials with whom he is, or has been, acquainted:\n\n   a. Valentin LOGINOV (201-285412): Assigned to the Soviet Embassy in Havana several years ago. He pursued AMSLOUCH/3 (daughter of AMSLOUCH/1 and 2) when stationed in Havana, and later in Moscow. AMSLOUCH/1 described LOGINOV as a rough peasant type. AMSLOUCH/1 when in Mexico about a year ago was looking at the Mexico Diplomatic List and noticed that a LOGINOV was assigned to Mexico. AMSLOUCH/1 asked a girl working at a foreign consulate in Mexico (identity) if this was the same LOGINOV who had been stationed in Cuba. The girl replied in the affirmative, and stated the LOGINOV worked in the Soviet Consulate handling business dealings between her consulate and the Soviet Consulate. The girl described LOGINOV as \"a very nice fellow.\"\n\n   b. Colonel Fedor V. DREMEN: Military Attach\u00e9, Soviet Embassy, Havana. AMSLOUCH/1 reported that he has conversed with DREMEN on several occasions, the last one being when Cosmonaut GUGARIN was killed. AMSLOUCH/1 described DREMEN as alert, smart, speaks good Spanish, charming and very proud that he is the son of a Cosmonaut. DREMEN told AMSLOUCH/1 during one of their conversations that he had been a member\n\nAttachment:\nIdentity (USC):\n\nDistribution:\n3 - C/SE w/att.\n2 - WH/CGG w/att.\n2 - COS, Mexico City w/att.\n2 - C/WH w/att.\nof a Soviet POW camp where German soldiers were held during World War II, during which time he claimed to have learned the German language.\n\n2. A photograph of DREMOV, provided by AMSLOUCH/1, was sent to Headquarters in UFPA-20721, 13 March 1968.\n\nHilda G. VAGIONAS\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n| LOGINOV | Valentin   |             | 285412 |               |                  |                   | M           |            |           |\n\n**Additional Information:**\n\nWas assigned to the Soviet Embassy in Havana.\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n| DREMOV  | Fedor V.   | (Colonel)   |      |               |                  |                   | M           |            |           |\n\n**Additional Information:**\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n|         |            |             |      |               |                  |                   |             |            |           |\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n|         |            |             |      |               |                  |                   |             |            |           |\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n|         |            |             |      |               |                  |                   |             |            |           |\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n|         |            |             |      |               |                  |                   |             |            |           |\n\n| Surname | Given Name | Middle Name | 201- | Date of Birth | Country of Birth | City/Town of Birth | Citizenship | Occupation | Residence |\n|---------|------------|-------------|------|---------------|------------------|-------------------|-------------|------------|-----------|\n|         |            |             |      |               |                  |                   |             |            |           |\nSECRET\n\nUnder Separate Cover.\nAttachment to:\nUFCA-30172\n\nIDENTITY: Lisa HAGELBERG, employee of Finnish\nConsulate, Mexico City\n\nSECRET\n\n00 filed 201-355911\n\nfiled 201-285412\n1. As reported in reference A, LIREALM-1 joined the PDRUMEN Section of this Station on 20 October 1967. It was decided that LIREALM-1 should drop further efforts against the Soviet, U.A.R., and Indonesian targets. The decision to discontinue efforts to develop contacts among Mexicans, also made at that time, was later amended and LIREALM-1 was entrusted with the handling of LIRELIC-1 along the lines of the recommendation made in reference B. Thus, by November 1967 LIREALM-1 had two main responsibilities: a) the French target, against which he already had devoted considerable time and effort, and b) the handling of LIRELIC-1.\n\nContinued..................\n2. LIREALM-1's efforts against the local French target have produced some notable results. First, through detailed analysis of personality and other data provided by LIREALM-1, the Station selected an access agent to the official French community who was later successfully contacted and was offered a contract (see reference C). The Station is already at work on what appears to be a good lead provided by the access agent spotted and developed by LIREALM-1. It should be emphasized that LIREALM-1 was in no way connected with the approach made to the French access agent. The second item on which LIREALM-1 has made progress has been the development of a Mexican employee of the French Embassy who is used as a general courier inside the Embassy. This development, for security reasons, has been slow. LIREALM-1's \"line\" has been that a person with \"the ability\" of the courier can and should expect a better paying job than the one he currently holds. The courier ended up taking that line as his own to \"protect\" him (as he probably would have some trouble if the Embassy discovered he was looking for another job). LIREALM-1 started meeting the Mexican courier outside the French Embassy. This gave LIREALM-1 the opportunity to talk to the prospect at some length without attracting the attention of the members of the Embassy. This is as far as the Station will allow LIREALM-1 to go in this case, which is currently being reviewed to decide who will continue the development of the Embassy courier and how. LIREALM-1 will not, in any case, have any connection with the person selected for this task. He will continue to maintain contact with the courier but will start to see him less often and will admit, in the end, that finding a job for him turned out to be more difficult than expected.\n\n3. LIREALM-1 meanwhile is continuing to cultivate a number of selected members of the French Embassy and reports on their activities as a matter of routine. He has also maintained contact for some months with a wealthy Mexican businessman who is a good friend of DEVOSJOLY, the ex-French intelligence officer who provided the material for Leon URRIS' best seller Topaz. LIREALM-1, in fact, had established DEVOSJOLY's identity as coauthor of the book long before this became known publicly. He was shown by DEVOSJOLY's friend a safe at the latter's house in Mexico City full of documents probably belonging to DEVOSJOLY. This information was reported to Headquarters via \"special\" channels.\n\n4. LIREALM-1's handling of LIRELIC-1 encompasses two targets. By far the more important one is LIQOLE. The goal here is hopefully to turn LIRELIC-1 into a penetration of LIQOLE using several good contacts he has in this organization as a stepping stone. Some steps have been taken in this direction. LIRELIC-1 has addressed personal requests for assistance to current key LIQOLE personalities. He has also submitted his curriculum vitae in the hope of landing a job in LIQOLE. This has so far failed to produce any concrete LIQOLE job offer. LIRELIC-1 realizes, of course, that he is of no value to LNHRAP unless he obtains a job giving him access to hard information on LIQOLE plans and activities. The promise of a regular salary, as a matter of fact, is completely dependent on LIRELIC-1's ability to penetrate LIQOLE. In an effort to maintain interim contact, however, and help LIRELIC-1 liquidate some personal debts, the Station, via LIREALM-1, made him a loan of 3,000 pesos. Further details on the LIQOLE aspect of the LIRELIC-1 operation will be covered in the forthcoming LIQOLE/LIRELIC progress report. In addition to\nthe above, the Station made an effort to explore the possibility of using a contact which LIRELIC-1 had with a PBRUMEN citizen in Acapulco to gain another window into LIRING. This PBRUMEN citizen owns a small hotel in the Mexican resort occasionally visited by LIRING personnel. Although LIRELIC-1 himself once delivered a package sent by his Acapulco friend and managed to have one or two meetings with representatives of the LIRING Commercial Section (to discuss the possibility of \"trading\" with PBRUMEN), it was decided in the end that LIRELIC-1's access to LIRING was too superficial to be of any great benefit. This decision was bolstered by the departure for PBRUMEN in April 1968 of LIRELIC-1's PBRUMEN friend, who left for what appears to be an extended visit to try to solve complicated personal problems. Thus, with the \"shelving\" of possible operational activities against LIRING, LOGLE became LIRELIC-1's only target in April of this year.\n\n5. Unlike his contacts with the French, LIREALM-1's dealings with LIRELIC-1 have been completely clandestine. LIREALM-1 meets LIRELIC-1 under alias in out of the way restaurants and other public places. A drop constituted by a P.O. box rented by LIRELIC-1 under alias (to which both he and LIREALM-1 have keys) was set up for LIREALM-1 to receive operational messages.\n\n6. References D and E reviewed an incident which occurred on 16 January and had a direct bearing on LIREALM-1's security. It is the opinion of this Station that the person who saw LIREALM-1 talk with Raymond A. FRADYER and Wallace B. ROWTON did not positively identify either of them. References stated that this person could not have been Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, who claimed to have observed the meeting. Reference E pointed out that before joining the PBRUMEN Section in October 1967 LIREALM-1 had for some time interested himself in the activities of the Soviets at Station request. He first made contact with LOGINOV, for example, in April 1967 and met with him on the average of once a week until October 1967. Reference E also pointed out that LIREALM-1 only had four meetings with the Soviet from October 1967 to January 1968. The Station wants to emphasize once more that these were all at LOGINOV's initiative. LIREALM-1 had discontinued his efforts to maintain contact with the Soviet at Station's directive. As pointed out above, one of the main targets now handled by LIREALM-1 is the French. One of the best places to meet Frenchmen is the French Club. Station would be very reluctant to have LIREALM-1, a long-time member of that club, terminate his membership. Neither does the Station want him to be too obvious in giving the cold shoulder to the Soviet. The Station does not believe, knowing what it knows of LOGINOV, that serious and permanent damage has been done to LIREALM-1's security and believes that he can continue to provide valuable services to this Station.\n\nfor Willard C. CURTIS\nAction Required: FYI\n\nReferences:\nA. HMM-34398, 3 April 1968\nB. HMM-16364, 25 April 1968\n\n1. The purpose of this dispatch is to provide Headquarters with additional information requested in reference B in the hope that it will assist the interested components in formulating a clearer picture of the reference A incident. The Station has consulted at length with Wallace B. ROWTON on the details that are provided below as well as, of course, with LIREALM-1 himself.\n\n2. First, with regard to paragraph 2b of reference B, a fuller account of the FRADYER/ROWTON/LIREALM-1 meeting at Sanborns will, it is felt, shed more light on the impressions that Headquarters had formed of the probable identification of ROWTON as LIREALM-1's \"boss.\" The following chronological account has been prepared by ROWTON from his reports and memory in consultation with LIREALM-1 (the numbers in the left margin refer to the time at which the events mentioned below took place):\n\n1610 (January 16) LIREALM-1 met with ROWTON at the latter's home as planned. ROWTON informed LIREALM-1, much to the latter's disappointment, that unfortunately he had not as yet received the reimbursement for operational expenses ($2,357.35 AN) requested by LIREALM-1 on 10 January 1968, nor had he received from the\n\nContinued.........................\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 2 - C/WHD\n2 - C/LPGLOBE\nStation any contract or other document that LIREALM-1 might present to LIREALIC-1 as he had proposed. ROWTON explained to LIREALM-1 that he had hoped to be able to see Raymond A. FRADYER before his meeting with LIREALM-1, but that this had been impossible.\n\n1620 ROWTON then telephoned FRADYER's office (in alias, open code, and double talk) and this time managed to reach FRADYER himself. FRADYER told ROWTON that he had the money and could pass it to ROWTON that same afternoon if he felt it necessary. ROWTON replied that he preferred to pick it up as soon as convenient for FRADYER and made a date for 1630 in the corridor outside the Koala Restaurant, about three or four minutes by foot from Sanborns. ROWTON then asked LIREALM-1 to wait for him in the downstairs bar of Sanborns, where he would join him with the money. LIREALM-1 left ROWTON's home alone, and ROWTON followed about five minutes later and proceeded (by taxi) to the Koala Restaurant. ROWTON distinctly recalls waiting for FRADYER for some 15 minutes.\n\n1645 ROWTON spoke with FRADYER for about two minutes in the corridor after receiving the envelope containing the money. In reply to FRADYER's queries, ROWTON stated that LIREALM-1 was somewhat disappointed that he could not provide him with some sort of written contract for LIREALIC-1 and also because of the delay in reimbursing him for operational expenses (some of which had been disallowed). ROWTON then revealed to FRADYER that LIREALM-1 was waiting for him at the Sanborns bar so that he could pass him the money without further delay. FRADYER then regretted that he had been unable to see LIREALM-1 personally to explain the disallowance of some of the expenses. ROWTON suggested that FRADYER might take this opportunity to say a few words to LIREALM-1, especially since the latter knew that ROWTON and FRADYER were meeting at that moment somewhere nearby. FRADYER agreed but said that he preferred the gift section of Sanborns to the bar.\n\n1655 ROWTON then proceeded alone to the downstairs bar of Sanborns and found LIREALM-1 waiting. ROWTON explained that he was late because of a last-minute arrangement with FRADYER for a brief meeting in the gift shop. LIREALM-1 then paid the bill and accompanied ROWTON up the stairs in the rear to the gift section, where they found FRADYER looking over the silver display in the shop.\n\n1700 An apparently casual conversation then took place, with FRADYER and LIREALM-1 doing most of the talking and with ROWTON occasionally examining the silverware on display.\n1720 When the conversation ended, ROWTON and LIAREAL-1 moved to the men's room, where LIAREAL-1 was able to check the amount of money for him and sign the enclosed receipt.\n\n3. It will be noted from the above that the ROWTON/LIAREAL-1 meeting with FRADYER was not planned in advance (as pointed out in reference A), but was a hasty recommendation made to FRADYER by ROWTON and an equally hasty decision taken by FRADYER on the spot. ROWTON and LIAREAL-1 had met previously only in ROWTON's home, except on two occasions when ROWTON picked up LIAREAL-1 in his car in the Ciudad Deportes (near the main Mexico City bull ring) between regular meetings to pass him funds. ROWTON had never met with LIAREAL-1 at Sanborns or in any other public place prior to this meeting.\n\n4. LIAREAL-1 also amplified his written report subsequently in one significant detail. In reference to the remark of LOGINOV to the effect that he had seen him with his boss at Sanborns two Wednesdays previously when \"you had a drink in the bar and then talked to your boss,\" LIAREAL-1 told ROWTON on reflection that LOGINOV had also stated that \"you were having a drink at the bar and a man came up to you and brought you to your boss.\" This indicates that FRADYER was meant as the person described as LIAREAL-1's boss.\n\n5. With regard to where and how often ROWTON and LIAREAL-1 have had operational meetings in the past, as requested in paragraph 3 of reference B, Station files show that between 20 October 1967 and 16 January 1968 ROWTON met with LIAREAL-1 at his home ten times. Besides these meetings with LIAREAL-1 at his home, ROWTON recalls only two other meetings with LIAREAL-1, when he picked up LIAREAL-1 in his car for brief meetings to pass him funds. Since the LOGINOV/LIAREAL-1 episode, ROWTON has met with LIAREAL-1 at obscure bars to avoid possible positive identification of ROWTON in the event LIAREAL-1 was under surveillance. LIAREAL-1 has passed his reports to ROWTON between their weekly meetings via a P.O. letter drop taken out previously by LIAREAL-1 under alias. The only telephone contact that has existed between them has been brief calls to ROWTON's home by LIAREAL-1 alerting ROWTON, in double talk, that he has left an envelope at the drop.\n\n6. With regard to the frequency of LIAREAL-1's meetings with LOGINOV, mentioned in paragraph 4 of reference B, LIAREAL-1's contact reports list only four meetings during the same period, all of which occurred at the French Club, and one of which, on 2 November 1967, was a casual encounter at which very few words were exchanged. It is significant to note, however, that at the 12 November 1967 meeting, while LIAREAL-1 and LOGINOV were chatting in the showers after the match, the latter \"joked that (LIAREAL-1) should bring some of his friends from the Embassy\" to join them in playing tennis. LOGINOV added, also apparently with a slight grin, \"all of them are WOFIRM.\" FRADYER, to whom this remark was promptly reported, did not consider it to have any special meaning since he knew from personal and direct experience that LOGINOV is a born provocateur who cannot resist needling people (Mexicans and foreigners) with whom he comes into contact. WOFIRM often comes up in LOGINOV conversations, not only with FRADYER, but with persons of other nationalities. It was decided, however, to again warn LIAREAL-1 at his next meeting with ROWTON on 16 November, when LIAREAL-1 submitted his report, not to involve himself with LOGINOV. LIAREAL-1 assured ROWTON that\nhis continuing contacts with LOGINOV were at the latter's initiative and that LIREALM-1 would not make any attempt to follow up or show any unusual interest. LIREALM-1 did not report seeing LOGINOV again until 13 January 1968 (two months later), this time, as usual, on the tennis court.\n\n7. Headquarters will recall that the LIREALM-1 relationship with the Soviets dates back many months prior to the date RONTON took over his handling. The file reveals that LIREALM-1 first met LOGINOV on 22 April 1967, and that at that time LOGINOV proposed to LIREALM-1 that they meet regularly, every Wednesday, for tennis and occasionally take in a movie with their wives. This leaves no doubt that the pace was set by LOGINOV himself since he undoubtedly saw in LIREALM-1 a potential target. The situation was further complicated by the character and modus operandi of LOGINOV, as well as the limitations of LIREALM-1's cover situation at the time.\n\n8. A principal dilemma facing the Case Officer with regard to LIREALM-1's exposure to the Soviets has been his regular attendance at the French Club. Since the French target has been one of the main ones left to LIREALM-1 after the elimination of the Soviet, Indonesian, and UAR operations, it was considered necessary for LIREALM-1 to continue his normal contacts with the French. He could have dropped his membership in the club to avoid further involvement with the Soviets, but this would have broken a long-established pattern and deprived him of his principal access at that time. It was therefore ruled out as counterproductive.\n\n9. Subsequent developments appear to confirm the Station's view that LOGINOV based his provocative remark on a hunch or, at most, on a strong suspicion concerning LIREALM-1. As mentioned in paragraph 4 of reference B, such prolonged social contact between an American and a Soviet \"is almost inevitably construed on both sides to have intelligence connotations.\" The Station wishes to emphasize, however, that whatever suspicions were aroused in the mind of LOGINOV concerning LIREALM-1 were already generated months before he joined the PBRUMEN Section in late October 1967.\n\n10. In conclusion, the Station feels that nothing has been noted in the subsequent operational activity of FRADYER or ROWTON to indicate that either of them has been identified as an intelligence operative. ROWTON has had no contact of any kind with Soviets in this area, nor has he detected any surveillance, either physical or technical, of his person or home. Both he and FRADYER, however, will continue to maintain maximum security to avoid any further exposure to such persons as LOGINOV. LIREALM-1, on his part, has been able to improve his cover by opening an office and making his overt activity as plausibly commercial as possible.\n\nWillard C. CURTIS\nREFERENCE: KMA-34363, 3 April 1963\n\n1. Reference caused deep concern in Headquarters -- concern which we knew you share. To hold any agent meetings in that particular cafeteria is unorthodox enough, but to meet there with someone in the category of LINEALM/1, whose cover is of special importance, suggests an unwarranted or disdain of basic operational security which merits reprimand.\n\n2. We appreciate your candid account of the LINEALM/1-LOGINOV episode, and have several comments to make:\n\n   a. Why LOGINOV would have said, \"I saw you talking with your boss the other day\" we do not know, but the fact that he made such a banal remark with a slight grin certainly implies that he did not have ordinary commercial business in mind.\n\n   b. In the context of the dispatch it sounds rather as though LOGINOV was referring to a meeting between LINEALM/1 and one other man, not two, in which case it was probably ROTHEN and not FRADYER when he identified as the boss. (To assume that ROTHEN and LINEALM/1 had been together in the cafeteria before the brush meeting with FRADYER took place, but this may be incorrect.)\n\n3. In order to shed some additional light on the matter, we would like to know even more about this particular Wednesday meeting and the pattern of meetings which have preceded and followed it. Were ROTHEN and LINEALM/1 meeting together in the bar or cafeteria? What was the appearance of the later three-way, fifteen-minute conversation upstairs in the silver shop (i.e., casual, serious, intense, sotto-voce, conspiratorial? Was any pretense made of \"shopping\"?) Our feeling is that ROTHEN is as much compromised as\n\nDistribution:\n2 - COS/Mexico City\nLIREALM/1, but in KOTON's case the loss is less because of accepted risks in his style of operating and since we have always assumed that his cover was thin, what is important to know in this case is where and how often KOTON and LIREALM/1 have had operational meetings in the past. Considering this we had assumed the KOTON-LIREALM/1 meetings were truly clandestine.\n\n4. Another point to be resolved is the frequency of LIREALM/1's meetings with LOGINOV -- from the reference we infer that the tennis games were a frequent occurrence, although LIREALM/1 had been told almost a year ago to break contact. Even if these meetings could not have been avoided as the Station claims, why were they not reported? The issue takes on even added significance as we understand the Station and Headquarters had been in agreement for some time that LIREALM/1 was to avoid any continuing contact with Soviets. Hindsight in this case certainly proves the correctness of the earlier judgment. (Experience shows that prolonged social contact between an American and a Soviet is almost inevitably construed on both sides, and with reason, to have an intelligence connotation.)\n\n5. The fact that LOGINOV did not mention the Sanborn's meeting to FRADIER can hardly be read to mean that LIREALM/1 is clean in LOGINOV's eyes, although FRADIER would naturally have been anxious to see what, if anything, would happen when he next saw LOGINOV face to face. It is true that we have no evidence that LIREALM/1 has been \"definitely branded as a KOTON operator\" but if he is even highly suspect there is still cause for deep concern.\n\n6. Various levels and components at Headquarters are trying to evaluate and debate this episode, and we would like to have your recommendations as an aid to our decision. From the few facts that we have we believe we must proceed under the assumption that LIREALM/1 is suspect or possibly compromised in the eyes of the Soviets. Accepting this, do you consider LIREALM/1 has further utility in Mexico? If so, we would like your views as to his proposed targets and handling procedures. After receiving further details as requested in paragraph 3 and your recommendations, Headquarters will advise you its decision.\n\n7. We recognize the Station is as disturbed about this breach of basic operational judgment as Headquarters and do not wish to belabor the point. We trust however that this experience will be a lesson well learned and that in the future the Station's clandestine operational procedures will be truly clandestine and professional in style for all of the Station activities, not just LIREALM/1.\n\nErnest A. Lusby\nAction Required: FYI\n\n1. Since joining the staff of the PBRUMEN Section of this Station in October 1967, LIREALM-1 has been handled by Wallace B. ROWTON under the over-all supervision of the undersigned. His three main activities have been 1) to handle LIRELIC-1, an asset who we hope will turn into a penetration of the Mexican PRI, 2) to continue to develop rapport with and report on the local official French community, and 3) to determine the degree to which LIRELIC-1 can develop access to LIRING and its personnel. LIREALM-1 has continued to see a number of contacts he had developed before joining the PBRUMEN Section, either at Station directive or by social encounter. One of these contacts has long been Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, Second Secretary of the Soviet Embassy and known KGB officer whom LIREALM-1 first ran into while playing tennis at the French Club, where both LIREALM-1 and LOGINOV are members. Station several times asked LIREALM-1 to break contact with LOGINOV, but this has not been possible since LIREALM-1's continued membership at the French Club is desired for operational reasons and LOGINOV, who probably joined the club for similar reasons, has continued to be one of its active members.\n\nContinued..................\n2. In January 1968 LIREALM-1 presented an accounting for reimbursement by the Station to which the Station took exception. Some of the entertainment of marginal assets involved totals which the Station found to be excessive. The result of this was that after some deliberation LIREALM-1 had to pay for part of these expenses out of his pocket. On 17 January 1968 ROWTON called the undersigned to ask about reimbursement of those expenses allowed by the Station. A brush contact was arranged for this purpose in the passageway leading to the Koala Restaurant, as ROWTON indicated that LIREALM-1 needed the money as soon as possible. At the agreed time the undersigned passed an envelope to ROWTON, who informed the undersigned that LIREALM-1 was waiting in the downstairs cafeteria of the Sanborns building. The undersigned, who had not seen LIREALM-1 at Christmas time and genuinely regretted the fact that the latter had to pay for operational expenses out of his pocket, agreed to see LIREALM-1 for a few minutes. When the undersigned refused to go to the downstairs Sanborns cafeteria, ROWTON suggested that he fetch LIREALM-1 and bring him to the silver shop upstairs in the same building. A 15-minute meeting (longer than expected) ensued between ROWTON, LIREALM-1, and the undersigned in a corner of the Sanborns silver shop. The meeting started a few minutes before 1700 hours.\n\n3. On 28 January LIREALM-1 saw LOGINOV at the French Club. The following is a verbatim extract of the report written by LIREALM-1 on this meeting:\n\nI had joined Val and my wife on her side of the court for small talk with Val. He apologized for interrupting our game and suggested we go back to playing and he would watch us. We had made a date for tennis Wednesday. He would call me if his leg still bothered him or for any other reason he was unable to play. Now he said he wanted to study my game so that he could beat me Wednesday. Val walked with me as far as the net where he stopped me and the following conversation took place.\n\n\"I saw you talking with your boss the other day,\" Val said with a slight grin.\n\n\"My boss?\" I asked. I suspected nothing and seriously considered the question. I began to search back in my mind if my cover boss had ever met Val. I recalled that I had once pointed Val out to him. The conversation proceeded too rapidly for me to answer my own question. The fact is that Val has never met my cover boss.\n\n\"Yes. At Sanborns two Wednesdays ago. You had a drink in the bar and then talked to your boss.\"\n\n\"Two Wednesdays ago... At Sanborns? No. You're mistaken. My boss left about six weeks ago\u2014almost two months ago. No. I don't think I was at Sanborns.\" I answered Val honestly confused. I began to wonder who I had been with. I've often met people in the various Sanborns. I was trying to think who Val was confusing with my boss.\n\n\"Yes. Your boss. You and your boss were talking together at the Sanborns next to your embassy.\"\n\n\"No Val. My boss left at least two months ago. I can't recall the particular meeting at Sanborns that you are referring to, but I'll drink with anyone, anywhere, anytime.\" Val and I laughed. Until this moment I was answering him honestly and sincerely and might have been very convincing.\nAs it began to dawn on me what Val was driving at I turned my back and started for the baseline. It was then that I felt weak and my face would have betrayed me if I had still been facing Val. By the time I reached the baseline I was composed. We spoke no further except to comment on good shots by me or my wife during the next five or ten minutes that he stood watching us.\n\n4. The undersigned reported the above to his superiors as soon as he received LIREALM-1's report. A check of the LIEUTENANT log for 17 January showed that LOGINOV had left the Soviet Embassy at 1404 and had returned at 1708 hours. This made his presence at Sanborns at the time of the meeting between LIREALM-1, ROWTON, and the undersigned impossible, as it would have given him about 10 minutes to leave the site of the meeting, get into his car, and drive to the Soviet Embassy, an impossible feat even in light traffic. It is clear then that LOGINOV was not present at the time of the meeting but was told that LIREALM-1 met with two Americans. It was and still is the undersigned's conviction that whoever saw LIREALM-1 was unable to positively identify ROWTON or the undersigned. The undersigned reasons that had LOGINOV known that he, the undersigned, had talked to LIREALM-1, LOGINOV would have mentioned his name after failing to obtain any reaction from LIREALM-1 from mentioning the latter's \"boss.\" The undersigned believes that LOGINOV, who is not completely stupid, would have either said nothing or would have gone all the way in his statements to LIREALM-1 had he known the undersigned's name. By the same token it appears that LOGINOV failed to identify ROWTON. The undersigned had only met with one other Soviet besides LOGINOV at the time of the meeting, and that only once; and that Soviet was no longer in Mexico City when the meeting with LIREALM-1 took place. ROWTON has never had any contact, social or otherwise, with any of the Soviets.\n\n5. The undersigned is the first to recognize that meeting with LIREALM-1 at the Sanborns silver shop was a thoroughly unwise move. He wishes to emphasize that this was the only meeting at the time that he had held with LIREALM-1 outside of a safehouse. All meetings between the undersigned and LIREALM-1 have since been held under the most secure conditions on the edge of the Federal District and, in one case, beyond. While this does not make this decision any wiser, he also wants to emphasize the fact that it was made on the spur of the moment, to quote the old cliche, because the undersigned \"felt sorry\" for LIREALM-1 because of the latter's financial difficulties with the Station over his last accounting. The undersigned unwisely put LIREALM-1's morale for a brief moment over basic security considerations. He is not in the habit of doing this as a matter of course. The day before his next scheduled tennis meeting with LIREALM-1 the following Wednesday, LOGINOV called LIREALM-1 and asked to be excused as his leg had worsened. The week after that LOGINOV showed up for his regular tennis game with LIREALM-1 but made no mention of his previous conversation with him two weeks before. The undersigned waited to complete a review of this case until he met LOGINOV face to face at one of the Consular Association functions. Because of the visits of Soviet athletes and artists which kept LOGINOV busy, however, this meeting did not materialize until 28 March. Although the undersigned and LOGINOV talked to each other off and on for more than two hours on this occasion during a visit to the local Home Fair, LOGINOV never mentioned anything about the Sanborns meeting. He has never brought LIREALM-1's name to the attention of the undersigned.\n6. During a recent visit to the Station, a representative of the LPGLOBE staff at Headquarters was given the complete details of the above incident by LINEALM-1. He also reviewed the same incident with the undersigned and the Deputy Chief of Station. The LPGLOBE representative mentioned on this occasion that in his opinion the above incident should have been reported by cable. The undersigned stated then and wants to repeat now that this was not done because 1) it would have served no purpose to alert Headquarters without giving all the facts, which were not known at the time, and 2) the Station wanted to review all elements of this case to report the incident objectively, fairly, and completely. The undersigned told the LPGLOBE representative that he would consider documentation of this case complete after having the opportunity of meeting LOGINOV face to face again. As pointed out above, this did not occur until 28 March. Nothing in the operations conducted by the undersigned, LINEALM-1, or ROWTON has indicated that the Soviets positively identified either the undersigned or ROWTON so as to definitely brand LINEALM-1 as a NOFIRM operator.\n\nRaymond A. Frady\nfor Willard C. CURTIS\n1. On 8 March 1968 after 201-827966 failed to show for two scheduled meetings (on the previous evening he had agreed to submit to a debriefing), the area of his hotel was checked by the undersigned. On a main street near the hotel the undersigned almost bumped into Valentin S. LOGNOV (201-138129). A few minutes later Ivan K. BARANOV (201-277838) was observed photographing the area (including the undersigned) with an 8mm movie camera. LOGNOV was standing near BARANOV observing the undersigned. LILYRIG reports that LOGNOV and BARANOV were absent together from the Soviet Embassy during the period in question.\n\n2. Another meet with 201-827966 was arranged by telephone for 12:30 on 9 March. From 12:28 to 12:48 the entrance to the hotel where the meeting took place was staked out by BARANOV and Vladimir A. DOLGOV (201-763035). BARANOV was carrying a 35mm camera with a larger telephoto lens. Visual identification of DOLGOV was tentative. However in view of LILYRIG reports that DOLGOV was absent from the Soviet Embassy for the period in question and that all other possible candidates were accounted for, the identification has been confirmed. In addition we have photos of DOLGOV wearing sunglasses identical to the ones he wore during the counter-surveillance.\n\n3. Although we have had previous indications that DOLGOV is probably a KGB officer the Station feels that his participation in this counter-surveillance is sufficient to list him as known KGB.\n\n4. We can also add photographer to BARANOV's technical duties.\n\nDistribution:\n12 - C/SB\n2 - C/WH\n\nMICROFILMED\nDATE 12 March 1968\nCOPY\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\n201-277838\n201-763035\n201-285412\nB-201-827966\nD-50-5-3\n\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\nHMMA-34271\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\nDATE 12 March 1968\nNOTICE NUMBER 50-5-3\nEnclosed is a finished copy of the SPR on Subject forwarded in draft under Reference dispatch.\n\nMonroe B. DIFFENDAL\n\nDistribution:\n3 - COS, Mexico City w/att 3 COPY\n\nAttachments: A 1 - 15 and 16 and 17 herewith\nB 16 and 19 Under Separate Cover 15 FEB 1968\n\nIDMN-16150\n8 February 1968\n201-285412\n\n1-SB/O/WI w/atts\n1-SB/C1/K w/atts\n1-NH/1 w/o atts\n1-RID w/atts\n\nC/SB/O/WI\nC/SB/C1/K\n\nC/NH/1\n\nSECRET\n\nOFFICE SYMBOL\nOFFICE NAME\nDATE\nEST.\n\nC/285412\n\nOFFICER'S SIGNATURE\n\nDISPATCH\nSECRET\n\nPREPARED BY: JONATHAN L. WEEING\nDATE: 14 August 1967\nCUBA NUMBER: 201-195412\nA-NUMBER:\n\n1. NAME: Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (3, 5)\n\n2. DPOB: 23 December 1927 in Moscow. (28)\n\nSubject has stated that he comes from Moscow (1), and his wife said they grew up together in Moscow. (6) He once told another source, however, that he came from the northern part of the USSR (8), but this source is not known for accurate reporting.\n\n3. CITIZENSHIP AND PASSPORT DATA:\n   a. Soviet Diplomatic Passport # 16993, issued 24 August 1960. (3)\n   b. Soviet Diplomatic Passport # 010264, issued 24 June 1965 (5), used currently. (4)\n\n4. ETHNIC ORIGIN: Unknown.\n\n5. OTHER NAMES USED: Unknown.\n\n6. CURRENT POSITION:\n   Third Secretary and Consul General at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. (1)\n\n7. RELATIVES:\n   c. Wife: Aleksandra Dmitriyevna LOGINOVA. (28) Known as \"Shura\". (1)\n      DPOB: 20 August 1928 in Moscow. (28)\n      Passports: D-16094, used in 1962. (4)\n                  D-010265, issued 24 June 1955, currently used. (4)\n      Description: Plump, has reddish hair. (15) Photographs are attached.\n      Languages: LOGINOVA has been studying Spanish with Carmen ROURE Canosa, a local employee of the Soviets, since at least June 1966 through May 1967 (1), but her Spanish is still said to be very limited. (6, 25) She is said to speak a little English (25), and claimed she had studied English in Moscow. (1) She is also said to speak some French. (25)\n      Miscellaneous: LOGINOVA has said that she has known her husband since age six as neighbors in Moscow. (6) She claims to be a chemical engineer. (6) During Subject's tour in Havana, 1960-63, LOGINOVA worked in the Soviet Consulate. (28) She arrived in Mexico on 10 October 1965, two months after her husband. (4) Since February 1966 she had been reported as chairman of the Zhenkem (Soviet Women's Organization), and as such has had to persuade the Soviet women to do various administrative chores, as well as being involved with running the dacha that the Soviets have had in Cuernavaca in the summers of 1966 and 1967. (1)\n7. RELATIVES: Continued\n\nd. Family: In June 1967 LOGINOVA asked the wife of Commercial Counselor Viktor Nikhaylovich IVANOY (201-245651) to call her mother when she got to Moscow, saying that her family lived at the Botanical Gardens. (1)\n\ne. Children:\n\n1) Daughter: Irina, born ca. 1952. (28)\n\nIn June 1967 Subject said he had a fifteen-year-old daughter, who was living with LOGINOVA's mother (in Moscow). (6) In April 1967 LOGINOVA said her daughter was in an English school in Moscow. (25) Irina was reportedly with her parents in Havana, 1960-63 (28); however, she did not travel with them from Havana to Moscow on 11 May 1962 (4) and therefore may have been in Havana for only a part of Subject's tour. She has not been in Mexico.\n\n2) Son: Dmitriy. (4)\n\nDOB: 1959 (28), birthday probably 6 August. (1)\n\nDmitriy was with his parents in Havana, 1960-63 (28), and arrived in Mexico City with his mother on 10 October 1965. (4) Subject has expressed interest in having his son take English lessons when the family returns from home leave in August 1967. (21)\n\n8. LANGUAGES:\n\na. Spanish:\n\nSubject speaks fluent Spanish with very little accent. (11, 24)\n\nb. English:\n\nSince 1966 Subject has been reported taking English lessons, apparently at the Instituto Interpretes Traductores in Mexico City. (1) In April 1967 he said that he had been paying a girl (American) for lessons in English, but that she did not have enough background in grammar. (25). (COMMENT: Subject was probably more interested in meeting American girls than in studying English in this case.) Subject's English is believed to be fair at present.\n9. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION AND PHOTOS:\n\nOne source described Subject as tall, blond and blue-eyed. (11) Another source said that he was six feet one and had short, reddish-blond hair. (24) Photographs are attached.\n10. PERSONALITY, CHARACTER, HABITS:\n\na. All sources agree in describing Subject as smooth and completely self-controlled. He is an aggressive conversationalist. One source described him as vulgar, crude, ill-mannered, short-tempered and a tyrant, who thinks he is a big shot. (6)\n\nb. Subject seems to have made a play for every girl he has met. In at least one instance he has claimed to be unmarried when inviting a girl out. (27) When his wife was staying in the dacha in Cuernavaca he reportedly made dates with other women. (8) On 13 September 1966 he was seen in a cafe with a Mexican-looking woman. (18)\n\nc. Subject is interested in sports and is good at them. In September 1966 it was reported that he did not play tennis, (15) and by April 1967 he was said to be a good tennis player, claimed that he had been playing for less than a year and never played more than once a week. (25) He is said to have the build of a trained athlete, the brutish look of a boxer or wrestler, and the grace of a natural athlete. (25) He has said that he boxed when he was younger, and that he plays basketball and volleyball (25), also that his favorite sports are skiing and speed skating. (21) He also plays chess but is not an addict. (25) He has belonged to the French Club in Mexico City since ca. November 1965 (1) and has been seen there frequently on weekends, sometimes with his wife and child. (15) One Sunday (20 March 1966) Subject and Yevgeniy Nikolayevich GORLITSYN were seen playing badminton with their wives at the French Club. (15)\n\nd. One source reported that Subject smoked \"Fiesta\" cigarettes (8), and another source reported in April 1967 that Subject did not smoke. (25) One source reported that Subject downs several beers after playing tennis (25), but another source reported that on a social occasion Subject did not even finish one Scotch and water. (19) On 8 February 1966 Subject and Vladislav Sergeyevich KORUSHKIN reportedly drove into the Soviet Embassy at 0300 hours roaring drunk (8), which may or may not be accurate reporting.\n\ne. Subject has apparently been taking English lessons since early 1966 at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, which is located at Tiber 113 very near the U.S. Embassy. He seems to have made friends with a number of people through these classes. (1) (Cf. under Contacts)\n\nf. In February 1966 it was reported that Subject's wife had bought a tape recorder. (1) In June 1967 Subject himself ordered a Grundig tape recorder. (1)\n\ng. Subject was reported having an operation on 1 February 1966 (17); no further details are available.\n\n11. CURRICULUM VITAE:\n\nSubject claims that he has served in the Red Army. (8)\n\n(Subject's name was reportedly listed in February 1960 as about to be assigned to Buenos Aires as Soviet Military Attach\u00e9; it would appear that either this was another person with the same name, or that Subject was being considered for assignment there as D diplomatic attach\u00e9.)\n\n14 September 1960: Subject and his family arrived in Havana, where Subject was assigned as Attach\u00e9 at the Soviet Embassy. (3, 28)\n\nDecember 1961: Subject toured Latin America as escort and Interpreter for the Dynamo soccer team. (28)\n11. CURRICULUM VITAE: Continued.\n\n11 May 1962: Subject, his wife and son transited Mexico City enroute from Havana to Montevideo (4), presumably on their way to Moscow on home leave.\n\nSeptember 1963: Subject and his family left Havana PCS. (28)\n\n1 August 1965: Subject arrived PCS in Mexico as Third Secretary assigned to the Soviet Embassy. (4) Subject replaced Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO as Vice Consul. (1)\n\n10 October 1965: Subject's wife and son arrived in Mexico. (4)\n\nAugust 1966: Subject was apparently promoted to Consul General after Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV left Mexico on 4 August 1966 for home leave. In September 1966 Subject was telling everyone in town that he is now the Consul. (1, 6, etc.)\n\n16 July 1967: Subject, accompanied by his wife and son, left Mexico for Moscow via Paris. (4) Also travelling with them on LOGINOV's passport was Tatiana, the daughter of Boris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH. (4) Subject has told several people that this is home leave and that he will be returning to Mexico (1, 6, 21, 22).\n\n12. INTELLIGENCE AFFILIATION: Known KGB, based on his having taken over an agent previously handled by known KGB officers Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO (201-305870) and Aleksandr Vladimirovich FRIKHODKO (201-202379), as well as his other intelligence activities given below.\n\n13. INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES:\n\n(Cf. also information under Contacts, below. Subject has undoubtedly been developing contacts, particularly with American girls, with a view toward intelligence possibilities.)\n\na. In December 1961 while travelling with the Dynamo soccer team, Subject met a Bolivian security service official in La Paz, Bolivia and reportedly tried to persuade him to study in Cuba. The source, however, is believed to be a fabricator. (28)\n\nb. After Subject saw the soccer team off, he continued to Panama, where he met with a Mexican citizen, Edmundo Fausto ZORRILLA Martinez (P-2818) on 16 December 1961. On 17 December 1961 Subject and ZORRILLA travelled to Mexico City on the same plane. Subject had ca. (US) $2000 with him in Panama. (29)\n\nc. On 14 February 1966 KGB officer Aleksandr Vladimirovich FRIKHODKO (201-202379) turned an agent over to Subject. (The agent had previously been handled by Subject's predecessor, Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO.) On 14 April 1966 the agent attempted to break his intelligence relationship with the Soviets, although he has remained in business and social contact with them. Subject, occasionally joined by FRIKHODKO, has continued to give intelligence requirements to the agent, who has questioned him particularly about his access to the U.S. Embassy and tried to persuade him to continue cooperating with the KGB. On 24 June 1966 Subject asked the agent for information on Eduard WEBELMAN and his son Mauricio. On 13 December 1966 Subject asked the agent to try to find out who the KOFIRE chief in Mexico was. (6) (COMMENT: Mauricio WEBELMAN was subsequently reported to be a friend of suspect KGB officer Yevgeniy Nikolayevich GORLITSYN's, 201-773422).\n13. INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES: Continued\n\nd. On 20 January 1966 Cristobal TORRES Ponce, chauffeur employed by the U.S. Embassy in Mexico, was sent to the Soviet Embassy to pick up the passport of the wife of a U.S. Embassy official who was planning a trip to the USSR. Subject talked to TORRES, asking him if he would like to visit the USSR or receive Soviet magazines, if he knew anyone who would be willing to give him English lessons, and finally made a dinner date with TORRES for 24 January 1966. When TORRES did not keep the date, Subject called him on 8 and 9 February 1966 in an attempt to keep the contact alive. (12, 14)\n\ne. Subject dealt with the Federal District police several times in July 1966 in regard to a radio that had been stolen from his car. On 20 July 1966 the police an (LHU) who had been handling the radio case reported to his superior, General Luis CUETO Ramirez, that Subject had offered him 5,000 pesos (4,000 dollars) a month if he would work for him. After consulting with the Minister of Interior, CUETO told the policeman to accept Subject's offer, which he reportedly did on 21 July 1966. Subject's first assignment to the policeman was to locate Venezuelan citizens Nicolas Juan BOSTROEM and wife. (16) (COMMENT: Nothing further has been learned about this case. BOSTROEM is a native Russian employed by Stephens-Adamson de Mexico, his wife teaches Russian at the Ibero-American University.)\n\nf. Subject has occasionally been reported visiting the small general store located across the street from the Soviet Embassy. On 5 November 1966 Subject reportedly questioned the store owner about the occupants of one apartment building in the same block as the store, and on 6 December 1966 he asked general questions about the new apartment building at the end of the block. (15) (COMMENT: Both of these buildings contain base houses for the fixed surveillance of the Soviet Embassy.)\n\n14. NON-INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY:\n\na. In Mexico, Subject has consistently been reported performing consular duties. He issues visas and sees visitors to the Soviet Embassy in one of the reception rooms. (21) He makes travel reservations for PCS and visiting Soviets. He is responsible when either PCS or visiting Soviets become ill and have to be sent to a hospital. He has often attended to the needs of Soviet ships in Mexican ports. He has done considerable house-hunting for the Soviets, such as looking for a new school building and for houses in Cuernavaca that would be suitable as a dacha. Subject had to sign the dacha contract in both 1966 and 1967. Subject also regularly attends the functions of the Consular Corps Association, and on 16 February 1967 he had the Association to the Soviet Embassy for a Russian evening. (1) In September 1966 Subject was reported as having become the Consul General (6, 8, 1, 11), having replaced Pavel Antonovich VATSOV, who left Mexico for home leave on 4 August 1966. On 21 February 1967 Subject tried to get Panamanian visas for himself and Soveksportfilm representative Aleksandr Aleksandrovich NIKITIN (known KGB) to attend a Consular Congress to be held in Panama 11-15 April 1967. (1) The visas were refused.\n\nb. On 26 January 1966 Subject attended a lecture given by a Mexican who was an exchange professor at a U.S. university. The lecture was sponsored by the PRI. Soviet Cultural Attach\u00e9 Svyatoslav Fedorovich KUZNETSOV also attended the lecture and sat on the platform, whereas Subject sat at the back of the room. (13)\n\nc. Subject is reported to have taken the following trips to Mexico:\n\n26-28 October 1965: To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship. (1)\n\n2-4 November 1965: To Mazatlan with Yevgeny Nikolayevich GORELITSYK to attend to Soviet ship. (1)\nSECRET\n\n14. NON-INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY: Continued\n\n4-8 December 1965: To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship. (1, 9)\n\n2-5 February 1966: To Mazatlan to attend to Soviet ship. (1)\n\n13-20 February 1966: To Coatzacoalcos to attend to Soviet ships. Soviet Embassy chauffeur Anatoly Pavlovich FRASHCHIKIN went with Subject but returned to Mexico City earlier. (1)\n\n25-28 April 1966: Possibly to Guadalajara with Soviet Inturist visitors attending a travel conference there. (1)\n\n4-9 May 1966: To Veracruz to attend to the matter of a missing Soviet sailor. (1)\n\n27-30 May 1966: To Veracruz to attend to Soviet ship. (1)\n\n26 February-2 March 1967: To Veracruz with Soviet Commercial Counselor Viktor Mikhailovich IVANOV to attend to Soviet ships. (1) While in Veracruz, Subject asked the U.S. Vice Consul, Richard BOOTH, if he would intercede with the Mexican authorities to get shore leave for the Soviet crew. (24)\n\n15. CONTACTS:\n\na. Soviet:\n\n1) Subject has been seen coming and going at the Soviet Embassy most frequently with Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123, known KGB), whom Subject replaced as Consul. Since Subject's departure for home leave on 16 July 1967, YATSKOV has been regularly using Subject's car. Subject has also been observed leaving the Soviet Embassy fairly often with Ivan Konstantinovich BARANOV (201-277838, known KGB sweeper) and Boris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH (201-767974, suspect KGB technician). Subject has also borrowed the cars of YATSKOV and known KGB chauffeur Vasily Stepanovich MIROSHNIKOV (201-273046). (7)\n\n2) In May 1966 Subject reportedly gave the wife of Aleksandr Aleksandrovich NIKITIN (201-784917, known KGB) a hard time when she wanted to send her son to the USSR with another Soviet wife. NIKITIN then complained to Aleksandr Vladimirovich PRIKHODKO (201-202379, known KGB), who reportedly ordered Subject to get a ticket for the NIKITIN child. (1) Cf. also above, where PRIKHODKO seems to be the senior case officer for an agent currently being handled by Subject.\n\n3) In May 1967 LOGINOVA mentioned that she had known Boris Aleksandrovich CHMYKOV (201-268115, known GRU) for years. (1) (COMMENT: CHMYKOV was stationed in Havana 1960-62, at the same time that Subject was there.) Cf. below for report of Subject's having taken CHMYKOV with him to Cuernavaca to meet ZAREBSKI.\n\nSubject has also been reported in contact with the following Soviets not stationed in Mexico:\n\n4) Vitaly Konstantinovich BOYAROV (201-355606, known KGB), visited Mexico 27 May - 9 June 1966. On 1 June 1966 Subject and P.A. YATSKOV were absent from the Soviet Embassy for four hours with BOYAROV. (7)\n\n5) Vasily Vasilyevich GRIGORYEV, member of petroleum delegation that visited Mexico 31 March-14 April 1967. While GRIGORYEV was in Mexico he was reported in contact with Subject several times, once making plans to go to the movies together, also to ask Subject whether he should attend a French reception and to report the illness of one of the other Soviet delegates. (1)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\na. Soviet:\n\n6) Boris Semenovich IVANOV (201-078078, known KGB), visited Mexico 8-22 February 1967. Subject made reservations for IVANOV in Mexico City and probably saw him off at the airport. (1)\n\n7) Yury Vladimirovich LEBEDEV (201-213261), Minister Counselor at the Soviet Embassy in Havana. On 7 February 1966 Subject was reported sending something to LEBEDEV with a Soviet professor who was travelling back to Moscow via Havana. (1)\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n1) Alonso AGUILAR Monteverede (P-2152, 201-334259), active Marxist intellectual.\n\nOn 28 June 1967 AGUILAR reminded Subject that they and their wives were invited for Saturday evening to the home of Alberto PENICHE. (1) (Alberto PENICHE Blanco, P-12294, manager of centrist newspaper El Heraldo de Mexico and reported as minor contributor to the FCM in 1964.)\n\n2) (Mrs.) Gloria ALFARO, no other traces.\n\nOn 5 February 1966 Mrs. fnu ALFARO (Possibly Gloria) wanted to talk to Subject to congratulate him on a Soviet moon probe. (1). On 22 June 1966 Gloria ALFARO reminded Subject that they had met at the house of Mrs. SOTO (possibly Gracilala, q.v.) on Christmas Eve 1965 and invited Subject to a party. Subject was unable to go but said he would call Gloria for coffee. Gloria gave her telephone as 35-71-30 (listed in 1964 to Yolanda ALFARO Vda de CACERES Buitrago, Chiapas 130-A, current telephone 25-10-24). (1) Also on 22 June 1966 Gloria ALFARO told Subject she would like to talk with some of the Soviets, and Subject suggested getting together on Friday \"after English class.\" (17) (COMMENT: ALFARO may have been studying English with Subject at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores.) On 3 August 1966 Gloria and Subject tried to agree on a date to get together, and she said she would like for him to meet a friend (female) of hers who was visiting Mexico from Central America. (1)\n\n3) Ofelia ALFARO Lopez (P-11339), professor of economics at UNAM, good friend of the wife of Antonio SARMIENTO (q.v.), social contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 30 August 1965 ALFARO invited Sergey Sergeyevich KONSTANTINOV to her house and included Subject and Leonid Vasilyevich KNIKIFOROV. (1)\n\n4) (Dr.) Juan Luis ALVAREZ Gayou, teacher at UNAM and Deputy Director of Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores,\n\nSubject presumably met ALVAREZ at the Instituto, where Subject is believed to have studied English. The first reported contact was on 11 April 1966, when they spoke to each other using the familiar form of address about having missed each other in Cuernavaca. Subject was invited to ALVAREZ' birthday party. Subject said he would see ALVAREZ the following day when he was going to have class with a new teacher. On 13 June 1966 Professor fnu ALVAREZ, Juan Luis' father, asked Subject if he would bring the projector to the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, and Subject said he would. On 12 July 1966 ALVAREZ, who had been out of town, asked Subject if he wanted to continue taking lessons, and Subject said yes, he would go there the following day. On 19 November 1966 ALVAREZ left a message for Subject to call him at 35-65-96 (listed to Natalia CAMERO de la Fuente, Garbure 251. On 22\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n5) (Inr.) Manuel ANAYA S., employee of Mexican Ministry of Hydraulic Resources, visited the USSR in summer 1965.\n\nOn 19 July 1966 ANAYA thanked Subject for his visa and said he would get together with Subject when he got back in order to discuss his trip. (17)\n\n6) Emilia ARCSAMENA Vallarina (F-10933, 201-771073), Panamanian Consul General in Mexico, in contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 15 November 1965 Aleksandr Vladimirovich FRINKHODKO said he wanted to introduce Subject to ARCSAMENA, because Subject had some questions to ask her. Presumably related is a report that the Panamanian Counselor Jose B. CALVO told Subject on 19 November 1965 that he had no answer for Subject yet. (1)\n\n7) Miriam AVILA Katz (F-581, 201-814144), employee of Mundus Tours travel agency, about to leave Mexico to marry an American and live in New York.\n\nSubject was first reported in contact with AVILA in April 1966 in connection with travel bookings Subject made. (1) On 2 June 1966 Subject flirted with her, and said he would invite her to a volleyball game. (1) During the rest of 1966 Subject invited her out a few times, told her he was married but that his wife was not in Mexico, asked her to introduce him to some of her friends and especially wanted to know if she knew anyone in the U.S. Embassy. In April 1967 Subject reluctantly agreed to issue a visa to Dr. KUTTLER (q.v.), whose travel AVILA was arranging, and asked as a return favor that she introduce him to some of her friends. (6) In June 1967 Subject reportedly stopped AVILA coming out of work to ask her about the Israeli War. (6)\n\n8) Celia BAYARDI Torres, no traces.\n\nOn 7 February 1966 an unidentified man visited Subject at the Soviet Embassy. This man came to the Embassy in a car driven by a woman, who remained in the car, with license plates registered to Celia BAYARDI Torres, Arquitecto 46, Colonia Escandon, telephone 15-34-02. The phone is listed to Francisca TORRES Vda de BAYARDI. (7)\n\n9) Leila S. BELAVAL, visa officer at U.S. Embassy.\n\nIn June 1967 BELAVAL reported that she had been in contact with Subject over visa matters, that Subject had asked her what she did in the evenings, whether she spent her off hours with other U.S. Embassy employees, and had said that he was unmarried. In June 1967 he offered to take her to the Ukrainian Ballet when it came to Mexico. She refused his invitations. (27)\n\n10) Carlos BLANCO Solano (F-9328), former Federal Security (DFS) agent, now with Judicial Police. In 1960-61 BLANCO invited several U.S. Embassy girls out and offered his services to the U.S. Embassy. BLANCO works for Carlos CASANADRID Miranda, who is suspected of having a clandestine relationship with KGB officer Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV.\n\nOn 1 November 1965 BLANCO called Subject at the Soviet Embassy and remarked that they had not seen each other for a long time. Subject said he would call BLANCO to get together the following Wednesday. (1) On 8 September 1966 Graciela SOTO (q.v.), who described herself\n15. CONTACTS: Continued.\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n10) Carlos BLANCO Solano Continued\n\nas BLANCO's friend, invited Subject to the baptism of her son Rafael's child and mentioned that BLANCO's wife Magdalena was going. (1) On 10 November 1966 BLANCO invited Subject to a party for BLANCO's daughter, said they would first go to the church near Graciela's house on Tamaulipas. (1) On 6 December 1966 BLANCO told Subject that \"Comandante Carlos\" (Presumably CASARADRID) urgently wanted to see YATSKOV, and Subject said he would have YATSKOV call him. (1)\n\n11) Lubomir BLAZIK (P-1730, 201-206043), former Czech Second Secretary and Consul in Mexico.\n\nOn 28 December 1965 P.A. YATSKOV left a message for BLAZIK, that Subject's wife was sick and could not attend the dinner to which the BLAZIKs had invited her. (1)\n\n12) Rosa Martha BRACHO Sanchez (P-12038), left in November 1965 on a scholarship to study ballet in the USSR.\n\nOn 21 and 22 September 1966 Rosa's mother (fnu) was in contact with Subject in order to talk to him about visa problems of her two daughters who were both studying dance in the USSR. (1) (Name of other daughter is unknown.)\n\n13) Erica CAMERMAN (P-12843), said to be a reporter with The News (17), but this seems unlikely, no other traces.\n\nOn 21 February 1966 CAMERMAN told Subject that she was going out of town the next day but when she got back she wanted to invite Subject and his wife to her house. Subject said he had no word on her papers yet. On 28 February 1966 she said she had been in Cozumel, Subject said he still had no word on her papers. She invited Subject to dinner with his wife, and he said he would call her back. On 10 May 1966 she tried to call Subject, who was out, saying that she wanted to know about the arrival of a man from Russia. On 11 May 1966 Subject told her he still had no answer on her papers. She said she planned to take a business trip to Brussels and Paris in June and mentioned that Elke (LNU) was in Paris visiting her son. On 10 June 1966 Subject asked for CAMERMAN at 18-65-61 and was told she was in Europe for a month (phone listed to importing firm Incomex, S.A. at Isabel la Catolica 45-914). On 6 July 1966 Subject called her at 12-75-32 (listed to the banco de Mexico at Cinco de Mayo 2) and told her he had a document for her. On 11 July 1966 she told Subject that she needed his signature on the document, also sent regards to Subject's wife and children. (1)\n\n14) Ernesto CHAZARO Peregrino (P-12815, 201-800142), assistant security chief of Astilleros de Veracruz, S.A. a shipyard in Veracruz. Said to be the advertent-type, once worked for the Federal Security Police but was fired because of involvement in arms contraband.\n\nCHAZARO Probably did meet Subject on 5 May 1966 in Veracruz. CHAZARO undoubtedly fabricated his story that Subject tried to recruit him after that and set up a 50,00 peso bank account in CHAZARO's name. (30)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n15. (Lie.) Jacobo CHENCINSKY, director of the Instituto de\nInterpretres y Traductores, located at Tiber 113.\n\nSubject's contact with CHENCINSKY was presumably been\nconnected with Subject's taking English at the Instituto.\nOn 24 March 1966 CHENCINSKY tried unsuccessfully to reach\nSubject. On 4 July 1966 CHENCINSKY told Subject that Janet\n(LNU, apparently Subject's teacher) had been unable to\nfix her working papers and had had to leave Mexico and\nasked if Subject's classes could be postponed. Subject\nagreed and said he would like to talk to CHENCINSKY. (1)\n\n16) David F. COOLBAUGH (P-12579, 201-796142), American\nemployed with United Nations in Mexico, co-director of geological\nproject that two Soviets were also assigned to.\n\nIn 1966 Subject was in contact with COOLBAUGH several times\nin regard to documenting the two Soviets working on the\nUN project. (1)\n\n17) Ana Maria ESCOBAR (P-11858), in 1965 reported to be a\nstudent and also working as private secretary to the FRI chief\nfor the Federal District.\n\nOn 11 October 1965 ESCOBAR tried unsuccessfully to reach\nSubject. On 12 October 1965 she told Subject she had\nwanted to invite him to the theater the previous day\nbecause she had been given free tickets. She sent\nregards to Pablo (presumably Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV). (1)\n\n18) Margaret (aka Magre) FEDOR (P-12967), no other traces.\n\nOn 17 March 1966 FEDOR invited Subject to go on a Sunday\nouting with a group of friends whom Subject also knew.\nShe mentioned that she was studying French in the\nevenings and was about to begin Russian classes at the\nUnited Nations. Subject said he would call her at home\nlater. On 28 March 1966 Subject told FEDOR that he had\nstopped by her house with theater tickets but she had\nbeen out. Rebeca (LNU) had told FEDOR that the play\nwas good. FEDOR told Subject that on Saturday there\nwould be a discussion with Jose CORNEJO (no identifiable\ntraces), who had been in South America, and Subject said\nhe would go. On 8 June 1966 FEDOR told Subject that she\nwas going to go to the U.S. on vacation and mentioned\nthat Daniel SEIN (no traces) had asked about Subject.\nSubject said he would call her later. On 24 August 1966\nFEDOR told Subject that there would be a discussion about\nIndia at her house on 26 August, and Subject said he would\ntry to go. Subject asked her whether she knew the Soviets\nworking on a United Nations project, but she said she did\nnot. (1) (COMMENT: FEDOR may work at the United Nations\nin Mexico City.)\n\n19) Fnu FLORES, man employed at Mex-American travel agency.\n\nOn 15 March 1966 FLORES, who described himself as a friend\nof Gloria's and others', asked Subject for visa\ninformation. (1) (Gloria might be Gloria PINTO, cf. below.)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n20) Socorro FLORES (P-12259), formerly employed at Mex-Americana de Viajes travel agency, no other traces.\n\nSubject was first reported in contact with FLORES in September 1965 in connection with travel reservations and for about a year Subject continued to discuss travel arrangements and at the same time flirt with FLORES and also send regards to Susana LNU, who worked with her. FLORES invited Subject to dinner with some of her friends. Subject was very interested in knowing who the friends were, but FLORES said they were not the Americans, because she hadn't seen them. On 8 September 1966 Subject arranged to meet FLORES in front of a movie theater. Then there was no report of contact between them, until on 13 June 1967 FLORES told Subject that she had a new job and asked him to call her at 27-85-50, extension 18 (no Station listing of this number). She mentioned that she had not seen him for a while.\n\n21) Rafael FUSONI Alordi (P-5119, 201-237904), Argentine diplomat, former KGB agent, in occasional social contact with Soviets, primarily through diplomatic functions.\n\nSubject met FUSONI at a consular corps function in January 1967 and again at a Czech Embassy reception in May 1967. Subject later called FUSONI and offered him tickets to a Bolshoy Ballet performance and on 11 June 1967 they attended the Bolshoy performance together and went to supper afterwards. (23)\n\n22) Moises GAMERO de la Fuente, no other traces.\n\nOn 6 April 1966 Subject reportedly called telephone number 2-30-65 in Cuernavaca from a pay phone. (8) (This number is listed to GAMERO.)\n\n23) Pearl GONZALEZ (P-11420), society editor for The News, Mexico City English language newspaper, in social contact with several Soviets.\n\nOn 25 November 1965 GONZALEZ gave a party and invited several Soviets. Subject was one of those who attended. (10)\n\n24) Alfonso GUZMAN and Carlos SANDOVAL, of Servicio Diplomatico in the Mexican Foreign Ministry.\n\nSince August 1966 (i.e. when Subject became Consul General), Subject has been reported dealing with GUZMAN and SANDOVAL in regard to Soviet visas. In October 1966 Subject had tickets for GUZMAN to a sports event, but GUZMAN was unable to go. Subject also invited GUZMAN to the Soviet Embassy reception on 7 November 1966. (1)\n\n25) Abdel Rahman HASSAN Abdel-Rahman, First Secretary and Consul at the UAR Embassy in Mexico.\n\nOn 1 June 1967 Subject and HASSAN discussed consular affairs and also talked about getting together for tennis the following week. (1)\n\n26) (Miss) Fnu HERNANDEZ, of the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, probably identical with Gabriela HERNANDEZ Elizalde, who in 1967 was the secretary at this institute.\n\nOn 29 June 1966 HERNANDEZ told Subject that his class would be postponed for a week because Sarita (LNU) was sick. (1)\n\n27) Lee HIGGINS, male, no traces\n\nOn 19 May 1966 HIGGINS tried unsuccessfully to call Subject. (1)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n28) Vincent HODGINS, British citizen, sales manager of Canadian Pacific Airlines in Mexico City.\n\nOn 28 October 1966 HODGINS contacted Subject, saying that BRADLEY (J.E. Ralph BRADLEY, regional sales manager of Canadian Pacific) had met Subject the night before, and HODGINS wanted to discuss business with Subject. Subject offered to visit HODGINS in his office, (1) (COMMENT: The Soviets began flying with Canadian Pacific when a new Aeroflot flight was put in service to Canada.) On 3 November 1966 HODGINS gave Subject information on flights and Subject said he would stop by his office next week. On 24 February 1967 Subject was reported to have an appointment with HODGINS. (1)\n\n29) Jan JAKOWIEC (P-9097, 201-250618), Polish Second Secretary and Consul in Mexico.\n\nSubject and JAKOWIEC seem to be good friends, in addition to being in contact with each other through consular duties. (19)\n\n30) Karen JOFFER, no other traces.\n\nOn 16 August 1966 Subject apologized to JOFFER that he had been busy the week before but said he could see her at 1630 hours that day. (1) (COMMENT: This could well be a routine visa request.)\n\n31) (Dr.) Yury KUTTLER (P-1573), dentist, Soviet contact, Communist sympathizer.\n\nIn April 1966 Subject was reported making a dental appointment with KUTTLER. (1) In April 1967 when the tourist agency representative, Miriam AVILA Katz, was trying to get a visa for KUTTLER, Subject spoke scathingly of him and said he would not give him a visa unless he fulfilled all the requirements. (1) Subject explained that he had once gone to KUTTLER to have some dental work done and that KUTTLER had charged him too much, and that this was why he did not want to issue him a visa. (26)\n\n32) Jacques LEMAIRE, representative of French steamship company in Mexico, scheduled to leave Mexico soon, member of French Club, where he probably met Subject.\n\nOn 14 July 1967 LEMAIRE invited Subject to the French Embassy reception that day, but Subject was unable to go. LEMAIRE sent regards to Subject's wife. (1)\n\n33) Yuliya LIPOVSKAYA, probably identical with the Julia YASCHIN listed in the telephone book as living in Mexico City 175, phone 15-35-47, presumably the wife of Solomon (aka Julio) YASCHIN.\n\nOn 30 November 1965 LIPOVSKAYA contacted Subject and told him a long rambling story about her relatives. Subject was evidently interested, urged her to visit the USSR and suggested she come to the Soviet Embassy to talk to him. On 24 December 1965 LIPOVSKAYA tried to call Subject but was referred by mistake to another Valentin. On 8 and 20 January 1966 she asked Subject if he had heard from her relative, the soccer player Lev YASCHIN, but Subject still had no news for her. (1)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n34) Tatiana HAKOFF Vda de MARCHAND (P-370), widow of Rene MARCHAND, boisselet, former professor at UNAM and director of the Jurcsalav Cultural Institute. She is evidently a native Russian, but French citizen.\n\nTatiana was seen visiting Subject at the Soviet Embassy on 3 January and 16 April 1967; Subject seemed very friendly with her, and on 16 April 1967 left the Embassy together with her. (7) On 9 January 1967 it appeared that she had asked Subject for a visa. She also told him she had the information on the man who had been consul, but Subject cut her off and said that it would be better for them to get together to discuss it. On 25 February 1967 she told Subject she would help him join a club. On 16 May 1967 she asked Subject if he had called the poles, but he said he had forgotten and would do it right away. (1)\n\n35) (Dr.) Alfonso MARTINEZ Alvarez (P-1799), Guatemalan leftist doctor, has house at Lake Tequesquitengo to which he often invites groups of Soviets.\n\nMARTINEZ was reported in contact with Subject in fall 1966 and in January 1967 inviting Subject and other Soviets to his house on the lake. Subject was also in contact with his son, Eduardo MARTINEZ (no identifiable traces). (1)\n\n36) (General) Raul MENDIOLEA Cer\u00e9cer (P-5700) deputy chief of the Federal District Police.\n\nOn 27 October 1966 Subject called the police to ask what MENDIOLEA's rank was. (1)\n\n37) William de MIER (P-5552), British citizen, general manager of KLM airline in Mexico.\n\nIn May 1967 Subject was reportedly discussing Soviet travel via KLM with de MIER. (1, 6)\n\n38) (Lic.) Oscar OBREGON, Jr., not further identified.\n\nOn 2 June 1967 OBREGON, who appeared to be a friend of Subject's, told Subject he would like to invite the Bolshoy troops to his house, but Subject said they would have little time in Mexico City. OBREGON also asked Subject if he could get him some caviar, and Subject said he would bring him some back from Moscow after his vacation. (1)\n\n39) David ORNELAS, of Mundus Tours.\n\nORNELAS has been Subject's principal contact at Mundus Tours in regard to making travel bookings. There has been no indication of anything more than a business relationship between them, except that in June 1966 Subject gave ORNELAS some magazines. (1)\n\n40) Salvador PAZ Flata (P-12775), shipping agent with Representaciones Maritimas, Soviet Commercial contact.\n\nOn 1 March 1966 it was reported that Subject had met PAZ in Pazarlan, and they used the familiar form of address with each other. During 1966 they were occasionally reported making luncheons dates or planning to get together after work. There has been no record of recent contact. (1)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n41) Gloria PINTO, located at telephone 23-62-85, listed to Dr. Jose Maria PINTO Ancira, Tajin 592, no other traces on either name.\n\nOn 17 May 1967 Gloria thanked Subject for giving a visa to her sister-in-law. She said that Ruth (LHU) was going to Valle de Bravo on the weekend, but Subject said he would not be able to go. She added that Alfonso (LHU) would be at the Cafe Juju that afternoon at 1700, and Subject said he would try to go and would see Gloria there.\n\nOn 13 June 1967 Gloria told Subject that her daughter did not want to work for Ralph (LHU) any more, because they wanted to send her to Pittsburgh. Subject said he could not go to the party Saturday that was to be held at the home of Ernesto ACEVEDO (no identifiable traces). On 12 July 1967 Gloria told Subject that she had everything ready and that she would stop by the Embassy to say goodbye (perhaps going to the USSR). (1)\n\n42) (Miss) Mercedes PINTO, no identifiable traces.\n\nOn 2 March 1967 Mercedes PINTO called Subject, who was out of town. (1) (COMMENT: Mercedes could be the sister-in-law of Gloria PINTO mentioned above.)\n\n43) Julio PLATAS Urbina (P-6948, 201-300319), claims to be a Soviet courier, has been in contact with the KGB, may be a provocation agent.\n\nOn 29 October 1965 PLATAS called, but Subject was out. On 1 November 1965 PLATA told Subject he had changed jobs, no longer worked for Mex-Hogar but was now with the Confederacion de Trabajadores Mexicanos (labor union). Subject said he would call him. (1)\n\n44) Rafael Alfredo RAYN (P-8415, 201-357138), manager of Garza Lopez Tours.\n\nSubject has been in contact with RAYN in 1966-67 on routine travel matters. In August 1965 Pavel Antropovich YATSKOV asked RAYN for a chart of all commercial passenger ships operating between Veracruz and New York for the month of September 1965, including the cost of travel and baggage. In December 1965 Subject reminded RAYN of YATSKOV's request and asked him to include rail travel to New York and sea travel to Europe on the chart. RAYN never provided the chart. (1)\n\n45) Sara ROSENFIELD and husband Loyd ROSENFIELD (P-11665, 201-789388), both writers for The News.\n\nBoth ROSENFIELDS met Subject at a reception at the Indian Embassy given by the Indian Consul K. D. PARASHAR. Subject invited them to Soviet Embassy receptions of 16 February and 23 February 1967, and invited Sara to attend the home show with the consular corps, which she did. On 11 July 1967 they again met briefly at an Indian Embassy reception. (22)\n\n46) Fernando Jose SALOMON Vallecillo, from Nicaragua.\n\nOn 24 October 1966 SALOMON told Subject that he had a letter from the Socialist Party of Nicaragua addressed to the Soviet Consul and that he had come specially from Nicaragua to deliver it. Subject said he would talk to SALOMON the next day at the Soviet Embassy. (1) (SALOMON also made an appointment to see the Cuban Ambassador the same day.)\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n47) Antonio SARMIENTO de la Barrera (F-12703), businessman who belongs to the French Club and has been reported friendly with several Soviets particularly Subject's predecessor, Oleg Maksimovich KHEIFEROV, and currently Leonid Vasilyevich NIKIFOROV.\n\nOn 24 April 1966 Subject was seen playing chess at the French Club with SARMIENTO and then went swimming with his wife. As of September 1966 Subject was reportedly still very friendly with the SARMIENTOS at the French Club. (15) On 17 December 1965 Mrs. SARMIENTO invited NIKIFOROV to a Christmas party and said to bring Subject and Sergey Sergeyevich KONSTANTINOV along. (1)\n\n48) Francis S. SHEERRY, consular officer of the U.S. Embassy. Subject has met SHEERRY at consular corps functions. On 28 January 1967 they discussed playing tennis together. (20)\n\n49) (Dr.) Emiliano SORIANO Ariz (F-6741), doctor frequently consulted by the Soviets in Mexico.\n\nIn November 1965 Subject took a sick Soviet sailor to be treated by SORIANO. In December 1965 and January 1966 Subject himself was being treated by SORIANO. (1)\n\n50) Graciela SOTO, no traces.\n\nOn 8 September 1966 Graciela, who described herself as Carlos BLANCO's friend (q.v.), invited Subject to the baptism of her son Rafael's child, also mentioned Rosita, who may be Rafael's wife (no traces on Rafael or Rosita SOTO). On 9 November 1966 Graciela called Subject, started to chat about having a toothache and that she had tried to call him before, but Subject cut her off and said he would call her the next day and to say hello to everyone. On 10 November 1966 Carlos BLANCO invited Subject to a party and said they would first go to the church near Graciela's house on Tamaulipas. (1) (One Alfredo SOTO, no traces, is listed at Tamaulipas 115.)\n\n51) Jiri SVESTKA (F-7111, 201-285441), Czech Second Secretary and Consul, suspect intelligence officer.\n\nSubject and SVESTKA seem to be quite friendly, ban dinner together as well as discussing consular business. (1)\n\n52) Leopoldo VAN DYCK, employee of Air France, said to be a homosexual, has been friendly with other Soviet consular officers.\n\nOn 6 and 13 September 1965 Subject was reported in contact with VAN DYCK in regard to visas for Air France passengers. (17) On 5 July 1966 Subject told David ORNELAS of Mundus Tours to give VAN DYCK his regards, adding that VAN DYCK would know what kind of regards they were. (1)\n\n53) Rafael VIDIELLA Ruiz (F-4805, 201-238943), came to Mexico in 1956 with his mother, Lucia RUIZ Garcia (F-4413), who lived in Moscow for 17 years and taught Spanish there. A Soviet officer Aleksandr Mikhailovich BROVNIK was reportedly one of her students. In 1958-59 Rafael translated for the Soviet TASS correspondent in Mexico, in 1961 he was teaching Russian at the IICMR (Soviet Cultural Institute), and he is currently teaching at the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores. His current address is Romero de Terreros 922-1, telephone 43-80-16.\n15. CONTACTS: Continued\n\nb. Non-Soviet:\n\n53) Rafael VIDIELLA Ruiz (P-4805, 201-238943) Continued\n\nOn 19 May 1967 VIDIELLA's wife tried to call Subject, saying that she was calling on behalf of the Instituto de Interpretes y Traductores, and that her husband had written a letter in Russian about some tourists and she wanted a Russian typewriter to have it typed up on. (1)\n\n54) (Col. and Lieut.) Rafael VILLAURRUTIA Lopez, also reported in contact with the Cuban Embassy in Mexico.\n\nOn 30 January 1967 VILLAURRUTIA said that he had to go out of town and could not keep his appointment with Subject. (1)\n\n55) Ralph WIEGANDT (P-2254), German who came to Mexico in 1955 and has paint factory, member of French Club.\n\nOn 13 March 1967 Mrs. Ruth WIEGANDT, using the familiar form of address with Subject, invited Subject and his wife to Sunday dinner. (1) In April 1967 it was reported that Subject was quite friendly with the WIEGANDTS at the French Club. (15)\n\n56) Douglas H. WILTSHERE, American employed with SERVISA Travel Agency.\n\nOn 10 May 1967 WILTSHERE planned to pick up some passports from Subject at the Soviet Embassy and mentioned that he would like to invited Subject to his house. (1)\n\n57) Michael ZAREBSKI (P-8777, 201-744856), businessman from Cuernavaca, Canadian citizen.\n\nOn 11 October 1966 Subject reminded the Polish Consul, JAKOWIEC, that ZAREBSKI was going to sell some of his items to the Soviets. On 13 October 1966 JAKOWIEC said he could introduce Subject to ZAREBSKI, or Subject could call him directly. (1) Subject had originally met ZAREBSKI at a Polish Embassy reception on 14 December 1965, and at another on 4 October 1966, and they finally did get together on 12 January 1967. Subject asked ZAREBSKI to help the Soviets find a house for a dacha in Cuernavaca, which he eventually did. On 24 February 1967 Subject and several other Soviets visited ZAREBSKI's factory and had lunch with him in Cuernavaca. On 20 May 1967 Subject and Boris Aleksandrovich CHMYKHOV visited ZAREBSKI in connection with the dacha, and on 15 July 1967 Subject and CHMYKHOV visited the factory. (19) (COMMENT: Subject and CHMYKHOV had known each other before in Cuba, and both had mestkom responsibilities for the dacha, so their going to Cuernavaca together is not remarkable, although CHMYKHOV is a GRU officer.)\n\n16. PAST OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY AGAINST SUBJECT:\n\nUnder Separate Cover\n17. OPERATIONAL PLANNING DATA:\n\na. Current Residence: Ignacio Esteva 18-1 (has lived at this address during his whole tour in Mexico). (1)\n\nb. Telephone: None at home.\n\nc. Car: 1965 green Impala, diplomatic tags 19-DA. (7)\n\nd. Office: Soviet Embassy, Tacubaya 204, telephone 15-60-55. (1)\n\n   Often uses one of the reception rooms near the gate. (21)\n\ne. Handwriting samples attached (the one in Russian was in Subject's possession, but is not known whether he himself actually wrote it).\n\n18. OPERATIONAL STEPS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN NEXT YEAR:\n\nThe Station is reviewing all of Subject's known contacts in a search for access agents. The case of Edmundo Fausto ZORRILLA Martinez is currently being investigated as a possible Illegals lead.\n\n19. SOURCES: Under Separate Cover.\n16. FAST OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY AGAINST SUBJECT:\n\nIn addition to routine coverage of Subject's activities in Mexico, the following has been done:\n\na. Surveillance of Subject in Panama in December 1961.\n\nb. In July 1966 information was passed to LITEMPO-8 \"proving\" that Subject was a dangerous KGB officer in an attempt to have him declared PNG, without success.\n\nc. LICOZY-5 continues to be debriefed on his contacts with Subject, although LICOZY-5 has told Subject he will no longer act as an agent for the Soviets.\n\nd. Briefing of U.S. Embassy chauffeur whom Subject tried to develop.\n\ne. Debriefing of LICOWL-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\nf. Station Panama City helped block visas for Subject and A.A. NIKITIN in February 1967.\n\ng. Recruitment of Subject of 201-814144, whom Subject was cultivating. Contact now dead.\n\nh. Briefing of U.S. Embassy visa officer whom Subject tried to develop.\n\ni. Debriefing of Subject of 201-800412, who claimed Subject had tried to recruit him but who appears to be a fabricator.\n\nj. Debriefing of LITEASE-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\nk. Debriefing of LIROBBIN-1 and 2 on their contacts with Subject.\n\nl. Briefing of LIROAN-1 as access to Subject's friends at the club he belongs to.\n\nm. Direction of BESABER in his contacts with Subject.\n\nn. Debriefing of LIREALM-1 on his contacts with Subject.\n\no. Debriefing of LIROCKET-1.\n\np. Debriefing of LICANNY-1\n19. SOURCES:\n\n1) LIENVOY, passim.\n2) FACY-7280, December 1961\n3) HZFA-11914, 11 January 1962, passport photographs\n4) LIFIRE travel reports\n5) HNKA-26881, 12 August 1965, LITEMP passport photographs.\n6) LICOZY-5 case file, passim.\n7) LILYRIC & LIMITED surveillance\n8) LICOWL-1 case file, passim.\n9) LNERGO report, 21 December 1965\n10) Contact Report, of meeting with KADIDDLE, 28 December 1965\n11) LICANNY-1 case file, passim.\n12) LNFURE memorandum, 21 January 1966\n13) Station memorandum, 27 January 1966\n14) LNFURE memorandum, 11 February 1966\n15) LIRGAN-1 information\n16) Station memorandum, Information from LITEMPO-8, 22 July 1966.\n17) Summary on Subject prepared by LIENVOY, 22 July 1966.\n18) LICALLA surveillance, passim\n19) BESABER information.\n20) Station memorandum, 30 January 1967\n21) LIROCKET-1 information\n22) LIROBBIN-2 information\n23) LITEASE-1 information\n24) LNFURE memorandum, 28 February 1967\n25) LIREALM Information\n26) Info from Subject of 201-814144,\n27) Station memo of 27 June 1967, info from LNFURE officer\n28) HNWK-13985, 16 September 1965, Hqs traces on Subject.\n29) HZFA-11859, 22 December 1961\n30) Information from Subject of 201-880412.\n\u0413\u0443\u0440\u044c\u0435 \u0412\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0435\u0435\u0432\u0443, \u043e\u043d\u043e \u0436\u0435\n\u0441\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0430\u043d\u043e, \u043c\u0435\u0436 \u0442\u0435\u043c \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438\n\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u044f\u0442\u043e, \u0430 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0438\n\u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u0430\u043a\n\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430\n\u0432\u0430\u043c\u0438.\n\n\u0421 \u0443\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c,\n\n[\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c]\n\n\u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0435\u0439 \u0418\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447\n\n[\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c]\n\n\u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0435\u0439 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0444\u0438\u043d\u043e \u0412\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0435\u0435\u0432\n\n\u0421\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0435 (6)\n\nCARDED\nLOGINOV handwriting sample, received 16 June 1967, from LIRENO\n\nTalanta Loginov\n15.6.55\nConsul\nLoigtes y de la California\nGinola\n6 1/2 pes.\nChief, WH Division\nChief, SB Division\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nREDCOAT/Termination of Contact with Subject of Reference\n\nREFERENCE: HMAW-15980, 7 December 1967\n\n1. A draft dispatch on Subject of Reference was prepared in August, but through an oversight, was never typed and sent out. As stated in that draft, Mexico City Station no longer has any operational interest in Subject and does not plan to seek an Operational Approval for her. We regret this delay in reporting. The text of the draft dispatch follows.\n\n2. Subject advised on 2 August 1967 that she planned to leave for the United States within the next two weeks to marry an American citizen and would thereafter settle in New York City. She identified her fianc\u00e9 as:\n\nMarty HARRIS\nAge 35\n152 E. 35th St.\nNew York, N.Y.\nTel. 680-0544\n\nShe said he is a textile engineer, but that she did not know the name of the firm he worked for. HARRIS, according to Subject, is Jewish. She said they will be married in early September in a\n\n......continued\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/WH\n2 - C/SB\n\n201-285412\nHMAW-33769\n29 December 1967\nCS copy filed\n201-51203\nSECRET\n201-814144\nsynagogue in Philadelphia, which is HARRIS's parents' home. They will thereafter take up residence at HARRIS's current New York address.\n\n3. Subject said that she had originally met HARRIS while he was vacationing in Mexico and had maintained a correspondence with him. In July of this year, he called her from New York and asked her to meet him in Cozumel the week of 24 July. During a week together in Cozumel, Subject decided to get married. Subject said she thought that one day she would like to return to Mexico with her husband to live, but that their present plans were to remain in New York indefinitely.\n\n4. In view of Subject's plans to leave Mexico indefinitely, we no longer have any operational interest in her and do not plan to seek an Operational Approval for her.\n\n5. Subject stated she had had no social contact with Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-255412) since December 1966, although she had seen him several times on business since then. She reported on 11 May that her only noteworthy encounter with him since December took place in April in connection with efforts on her part to secure a Soviet visa for a leftist client of hers. LOGINOV balked at granting the visa because of alleged personal dislike of the applicant, but finally gave in as a \"personal favor\" to Subject. He stated bluntly, however, that Subject should realize \"a favor must be repaid by a favor\" and renewed in much more direct terms a prior request that Subject introduce him to someone among her friends who was or was inclined to be sympathetic toward the Soviet Union. Subject replied somewhat flippantly that she'd keep the request in mind in case she met or thought of anyone in this category. (Subject had earlier reported that LOGINOV had once specifically asked her if she had any friends in LNPUR, but that she had dodged the question and he had not pursued it.)\n\n6. LICOZY-5 told Francis J. COIGNE in June 1967 that on 5 June LOGINOV had pressed him for information on the local Jewish reaction to the Arab-Israeli war. LICOZY-5 also stated that on 5 June Subject, who was very excited about the war and had even gone to the Israeli Embassy to volunteer to serve in Israel, had told him that when she returned home from work on the evening of 5 June, LOGINOV was waiting for her on the street and tried to pump her for information on local Jewish reactions to the war. LICOZY-5 stated that Subject told him she gave LOGINOV hell for the Soviets' support of the Arabs.\n\n7. LICOZY-5 stated that Subject told him that in March she had been called to LNPUR and had been asked about her contact with LOGINOV. She added, according to LICOZY-5, that she had seen the same LNPUR officer (no name given, according to LICOZY-5) a couple weeks earlier. LICOZY-5 said that she also told him that LOGINOV had asked her to introduce him to \"one of her progressive friends\" or \"someone in LNPUR.\"\n\n8. The above represented a capsule account of Subject's relationship with her case officer, Keith H. LEVENDERS. COIGNE played innocent until he got the whole story, but finally admitted that he had talked to the girl. COIGNE told LICOZY-5 that Subject had no contact with us and had in fact worried that her activities in our behalf might create trouble for him. Asked by COIGNE what advice he had given Subject, LICOZY-5 said that he had told her to be truthful with the LNPUR officer and to be careful with LOGINOV.\n\n9. On 2 August, during a very friendly \"farewell\" lunch, LEVENDERS asked Subject both about her most recent contacts with LOGINOV and whether anyone knew of her contact with LNPUR. (She had previously given the strongest assurances that she could be counted on to keep this contact confidential.) With respect to\nthe first question, she stated that LOGINOV had come to her office a couple of times on visa and Soviet travel business, but that she otherwise had not seen him. Although given ample opportunity, she said nothing about LOGINOV having waited for her in front of her apartment or about his questioning her about local reaction to the Israeli-Arab war. As for the second question, she assured LEVENDERSIS that she had told no one of her contact with him or LOGINOV.\n\n10. We are inclined to believe that Subject lied about not telling anyone of her contact with us because it would have been extremely embarrassing for her to admit that she had failed both to follow instructions and to keep her promise. While it is uncertain exactly why she did tell LICOZY-5, the apparent timing (the second day of the Israeli-Arab war) suggests it was the result of her agitated state of mind, her anger at the Soviets for their support of the Arabs, her possible imminent departure for Israel and the uncertainty of her fate, and her warm regard and respect for LICOZY-5 as a fellow pro-Zionist. (Subject, whose mother is Jewish and who became romantically involved with Israel and Zionism after visiting Israel a couple of years ago, told LEVENDERSIS on 2 August that she had indeed gone to the Israeli Embassy to volunteer to serve in Israel and had been immediately accepted because she had had training in nursing. She said she had been told to stand by for transportation to Israel and had expected to be called literally at any minute. She said that the brevity of the war had made her services unnecessary, however.)\n\n11. While it is clear Subject lied about not having revealed her contact with LNPURE to anyone, we are inclined to believe that LICOZY-5 made up the story of LOGINOV waiting for Subject in front of her apartment and questioning her about local reaction to the war. Knowing LICOZY-5, it seems very possible that he invented the story in order to explain why Subject confided in him - i.e., she was already emotionally upset about the war and when LOGINOV contacted her she understandably told Subject, which led to her revealing the whole story. In any event, we consider the case closed and do not intend to pursue the question of who is telling the truth with LICOZY-5.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\nREFERENCE: MEXICO CITY 3524, 17 November 1967\n\n1. Transmitted herewith is the debriefing of Subject on her contacts with Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412).\n\n2. The Station intends to recontact Subject upon her return to Mexico in order to assess her short-term possibilities against LOGINOV.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\n\nAttachment:\nContact Report\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/SH, v/att.\n3 - C/SH, v/att.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: Elizabeth Duncan WILDE\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 12 December 1967\n\n1. A Headquarters officer made arrangements by telephone for me to interview Subject on 12 December. She was told that I would arrive at Toledo at 10:30 and call her. However, my plane developed mechanical trouble and I called her from Pittsburg to advise that I would be 3 hours late. I arrived at Toledo at 13:30 and called her. We agreed that I would come to her mother's apartment at 14:30. The interview lasted from 14:30 to 18:30. During the last hour we were joined by her mother but, since she is senile and hard of hearing, we were able to continue talking without interruption.\n\n2. I introduced myself as Peter Clark from the Embassy in Mexico. Subject accepted me without question and immediately began telling her story which was about the same as we had received from the political officer. The telling took only 10 minutes. I had considerable difficulty in taking her through a chronological account and holding her to one subject. It became obvious that she is a very self-centered person who is not interested in others unless they make a strong impression on her which LOGINOV obviously did. She is impossible on names, dates or times, asking me at least three times during the interview to repeat my name. On the other hand she was completely cooperative and did not appear to be withholding or distorting information.\n\n3. The following account of her contacts are pieced together from her chaotic account and, thus, is by no means perfect:\n\na. She was in Mexico about 10 days on her most recent trip and met LOGINOV about a week before she left (ca 10 November). She met him at a party given by a Spanish couple (names forgotten) at their home in the southern part of the city to which her host, Dr. Frederico MARIN (see below) had been invited. It was a large party which included Mexicans, foreigners and diplomats. She met LOGINOV through a German man whom she had just met (van Henrichs or Kendrichs, no meaningful traces.) She talked to LOGINOV on and off for an hour. After an exchange of amenities she remarked that he spoke good English. He said it needed improvement and asked if she would be willing to give him lessons. She would like to but must leave in a week. He asked if she had any American friends who could teach him. She explained that she had friends when she lived in Mexico from 1954 to\n1956 but they are all gone now. However she offered to make inquiries and suggested that he go to the American Embassy to find a teacher. He answered that both the American Embassy and his own would frown on the idea and would not think well of it. Later she asked what he would do with his English once he had learned it. He answered that he would like to go to the United States. What would your government think of that? He answered, \"Well we all have to better ourselves\". During this discussion he got the story of her life including the fact that she has written a book which is still in manuscript (see below). He expressed interest and asked to read it. She said she had a copy and he asked her to drop it off at his embassy. He also said that he doesn't like Mexicans but prefers the company of Americans who are more like Russians. Upon parting it was agreed that she would drop by his embassy to give him the manuscript.\n\nb. Two days later she dropped by his embassy and he talked to her in the outside reception area. She left him the manuscript and told him that he could keep it until she returned to Mexico. He gave her his card. He told her that she shouldn't call him because his phone was always tapped (she assumed he meant it was tapped by his own people). He added that he supposed the same thing happened at the American Embassy and asked, if she went there often. She answered that she had only been there twice in her life. He again inquired about her American friends in Mexico and she answered that she had no current ones. He again said he would like to meet Americans and asked her again to look for an American who could teach him English. On parting he said he would call her before she left (he knew that she was leaving in a few days to take care of her sick mother).\n\nc. He called a day or so later and came over at ca 10:00 to Dr. MARIN's house where she was staying (not on LIENVOY). He asked when she would be back and how could he contact her in the United States. She gave him her mailing address and promised to answer if he wrote. He again asked her to find him an English teacher. She asked him, if he ever thought of going to the United States. Smiling, he answered, \"Yes, who doesn't dream of going.\" He added that he can't go anywhere until he learns the language. She asked, if he would like to make a change. He answered that he has to be careful because he has a mother and family in the USSR. (From this Subject inferred that he would like to change and is only afraid of penalizing his family). He left on the note that she would try to find him a teacher and would contact him upon her return to Mexico.\n\nd. Subject and Dr. MARIN agreed that LOGNOV was a fine person and they should help him get a teacher. Dr. MARIN suggested that Subject go to the American Embassy since they give English classes.\nSECRET\n\n- 3 -\n\n(Comment: Mexicans still commonly believe that the Mexican - North American Cultural Institute is part of the Embassy). Therefore Subject went to the Embassy on the morning of 16 December and was referred to a Mexican girl on the second floor (USIS). Subject told this girl her story and received the names of several teachers at the Institute. As she was leaving she thought that the Embassy would be interested in her story and thus fell into the hands of the political officer. She then went back to the Soviet Embassy but LOGINOV was not in so she left the list of teachers with the guard for him. She left Mexico the next day, 17 December.\n\n4. LILYRIC photo coverage shows that Subject was at the Soviet Embassy from 13:35 to 13:42 on 16 November (after leaving the American Embassy). She arrived and departed in a taxi. LILYRIC also reports that LOGINOV was out from 13:14 to 13:52 on that date which confirms Subject's statement that he was not there. LILYRIC photo coverage also shows that Subject visited the Soviet Embassy from 11:20 to 11:54 on 10 November 1967, arriving and departing by taxi, (her first visit to the Embassy). Again, LILYRIC has LOGINOV in the Embassy from 09:07 to 13:45 on that date, thus confirming that Subject actually did see him. Thus her first meeting with LOGINOV at the party was probably on 6 or 8 November 1967. On 7 November LOGINOV was at the reception in the Embassy. LIENVOY has no information on a social engagement for LOGINOV at that time.\n\n5. From her account it was obvious that she was extremely impressed with LOGINOV both physically (\"he is such a handsome man\") and as a person. From her conversations she concluded that he liked Americans and was interested in meeting them, that he is really interested in learning English so that he can go to the United States and that, somehow, he didn't want his own people to know about these interests and intentions. In fact, LOGINOV did a fine job in debriefing her and in keeping the contact open. This type of activity has become standard for him in Mexico.\n\n6. Although the subject of his marital status never came up, Subject assumes that LOGINOV is single. \"He acts like a single man\". He loves parties and dancing and sports. (Again, standard behavior for him.)\n\n7. BIOGRAPHIC DATA:\n\nElizabeth Duncan WILDE was born Elizabeth DUNCAN on 28 December 1918 in Tallahassee, Florida. Her parents were prosperous farmers outside Tallahassee who lost everything in the depression. They then moved to Toledo where her father and brothers gradually built up a successful construction business. Her father died about 10 years ago. Her mother is 81 and is expected to live two or three months. In 1942 she married Elliot H. JACKSON in Dallas, Texas.\nThey were divorced 4 years later. In 1948 she married William P. STORY III in California. They divorced in 1948. In 1954 she came to Mexico and opened the Scientific Institute for the Correction of Obesity located at Reforma 376. At this time she met and became friends of Dr. MARIN and his wife. On 11 December 1956 she married Russel H. WILDE in Norwalk, Conn. They have been separated for seven years. WILDE who is 15 years her senior was for 37 years a member of the New York law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton and Garrison. He left this firm 4 years ago and now is associated with the firm Shelleck, at 485 Madison Ave. He lives at the Yale Club in NYC. In 1957 she sold her institute to her employers. She has been in and out of Mexico ever since, always staying with Dr. MARIN. She also travels regularly to Europe. Her current address is 2024 New Bedford Rd., Spring Lake, N.J. Telephone 449-4230 (unlisted). She is currently living with and caring for her mother at 2829 North Kendale Dr., Apt. 101, Toledo, Ohio. Telephone 419-474-0348. She has no children. She has a generous allowance from her current husband.\n\n3. ASSESSMENT:\n\nSubject was obviously a very handsome woman who appears to have spent her better years running through a series of wealthy husbands and lovers. As noted above, she is extremely self-centered and is uninterested in other people as people. Thus she is a poor observer and reporter. She has a \"bug\" on Jews and Negroes. She went into great detail on how American \"ZIONISTS\" control all the information media in the United States and even influence government policy. This is a \"conspiracy\" which is currently engaged in supporting the Negro movement, especially moving into white housing. This is the subject of her book, noted above. She has also had 4 accidents in the last four years (two fires in her home and two automobile accidents) which she considers a plot against her. She suspects an old, vindictive lover from whom she broke when she discovered that he was a Jew. Although Subject is not nearly as bad as the above distillation would suggest, she is slightly unstable. She is very much interested in helping us against LOGINOV and stated several times that she would cooperate completely. She is clearly not suitable for a long-term or complicated relationship with LOGINOV but could be used on a short-term basis to introduce another person or to be an instrument in a provocation.\n\n9. At the conclusion of the interview, Subject was told that, although she had every reason to interpret events as she did, LOGINOV specializes in contacting and developing Americans as he did her. From her story, there was no reason to believe that he was displaying vulnerabilities. Therefore we have no reason for her to attempt to prolong the relationship or cultivate him. On the other hand she has to contact him in order to get back her manuscript. She is not to suggest further contact but is to report to us any further contact\nSECRET\n\ninitiated by LOGINOV. Obviously disappointed, Subject agreed to obey instructions. After she has reobtained the manuscript she is to call the Station (x870, Betty calling for Bill Smith) and set a time for the meeting \"at the house\" (Dr. MARIN's) or at \"the Cafe\" (Cafe Mississippi). Subject expects to return to Mexico sometime in the spring of 1968.\n\n10. Dr. Frederico MARIN is Subject's host in Mexico. He is a pediatrician who owns a hospital or sanitorium (name and location unknown) in Mexico City. He served as a medical officer with the U.S. Army in World War II. Subject first met him and his wife in 1954 when she opened her institute. They have been close friends ever since. His wife died a year ago. She gave his address as Rio Duero 54, telephone 11-63-60 (no Station traces but checks out in the telephone book). She made me promise that I would not contact him because, as a Mexican, he wouldn't want to get involved between Soviets and Americans. However, when Subject returns we intend to meet him through her to investigate his possible usefulness and as a means of further assessment of Subject.\n\n11. PLANS:\n\nDebrief Subject after her next contact with LOGINOV and meet and assess Dr. MARIN for possible use.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\nREFERENCE: HMA-32769, 10 August 1967\n\nMonroe H. Heidemann took over the handling of LIBOCKET-1 from Keith R. Levender in on 26 July 1967. There has been no change in the objectives of the operation, and meetings with LIBOCKET-1 have continued to be devoted largely to debriefing him on his sessions with the Soviets. Forwarded herewith is Heidemann's progress report for the period 1 August through 8 December 1967.\n\nFor/Willard C. CESTIS\n\nAttachment:\nProgress Report\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/WI, w/att.\n2 - C/SS, w/att.\n\nLOGONK\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nDISPATCH SYMBAE AND NUMBER\nDATE\nHMA-32739\n26 December 1967\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\nSHORT\n201-789767\n\n501-265412\nSECRET\n\nPROGRESS REPORT\n\n1. This report governs the activities of LIROCKET-1 in the period 1 August to 8 December 1957. During this period, with the exception of a summer break, LIROCKET-1 maintained his role as a teacher at the Soviet Embassy. In an effort to summarize the more salient occurrences during this period, we have endeavored to present it, as far as possible, in a chronological manner under the name of the individual to whom the material is related.\n\n2. Boris Alekseyevich KAZANTSEV (201-038975). On 1 August, KAZANTSEV verbally admonished Vladimir Alekseyevich GONCHARENKO (201-760865) for arriving at the class some 10 minutes late and for having neglected to pay LIROCKET-1 on this date. KAZANTSEV, quipped to LIROCKET-1 that \"these young men are becoming more irresponsible.\" Pavel Fedorovich KOVALYEV told LIROCKET-1 that he was preparing invitations for the departure of one of LIROCKET-1's previous students and that he would put one aside for LIROCKET-1. KAZANTSEV interrupted and stated, \"I'm inviting the teacher and I will give him the invitation.\" KOVALYEV made no further comment on the subject. Later, when alone, KAZANTSEV told LIROCKET-1 that he was the \"number two man in the Soviet Embassy\" even though he holds the number three position. He referred to himself as the Charge d'Affaires. This was the first time that KAZANTSEV had ever spoken of his rank or position to LIROCKET-1.\n\n3. On 17 August KAZANTSEV studied for one hour with LIROCKET-1. LIROCKET-1 commented that KAZANTSEV's level of fluency exceeded all of his other students. According to KAZANTSEV, upon his return home in June, he was required to take his English language examination and scored a final mark of 4.5 out of a possible 5. KAZANTSEV lost the 1/2 point only because he had not read any English language books during the previous months.\n\n4. On 24 August, KAZANTSEV stated that his wife had been having stomach trouble of a undisclosed origin. She had just returned from the hospital where she underwent tests to determine the nature of her illness.\n\n5. During the class of 29 August, KAZANTSEV read an article in the English language newspaper, The News, pertaining to the diminution of the male sex drive among heavy smokers. This triggered a long monologue by KAZANTSEV on the evils of pornographic literature. KAZANTSEV found this aspect of Western society distasteful and serving no useful purpose.\n\nSECRET\n\nNO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION\n6. On 31 August, KAZANTSEV told LIROCKET-1 that Semyon Tarasovich BAZAROV (201-040227) was again interested in taking English lessons from LIROCKET-1. LIROCKET-1 commented that he might be able to accommodate BAZAROV only from mid-September to the end of November. KAZANTSEV left the room and contacted BAZAROV. Upon returning KAZANTSEV stated that BAZAROV would have pressing obligations in connection with the forthcoming anniversary and Olympics and could not begin classes until sometime thereafter.\n\n7. On September, KAZANTSEV commented that he would like to continue studying English because he expected to return PCS to his country at the end of 1967 or early 1968. KAZANTSEV acknowledged that he might be asked to stay on during the Olympics. However, he indicated that this was unlikely to prevent him from returning. KAZANTSEV reiterated his desire to depart Mexico in the near future.\n\n8. On 10 October, KAZANTSEV received several pocket books in English which he had requested LIROCKET-1 to pick out for him. LIROCKET-1 selected them from his own library. KAZANTSEV stated that he did not care what subjects were chosen; he wanted them only to improve his reading ability. He did mention, however, that he preferred not to read books which had either violence or pornography as their central theme. LIROCKET-1 brought a book on science fiction which did not particularly interest KAZANTSEV, a book on ballet, and a book on the FBI in which KAZANTSEV seemed very interested. KAZANTSEV stated that he would have to discontinue all of his classes from 10 October to 16 November as he was scheduled for vacation during this period.\n\n9. On 16 November, KAZANTSEV interrupted a class containing Vladimir Makalovitch GONCHARENKO (201-760368) and Yevgeniy Ivanovich BEDRIN (201-760220) to announce that he would not study that day. Immediately, BEDRIN wheeled around and told KAZANTSEV very explicitly that he should remain and study. To this KAZANTSEV replied in English, \"See the pressure my chief puts on me\". It was quite apparent to LIROCKET-1 that BEDRIN was in charge of the language lessons and that KAZANTSEV was seemingly very hesitant to defy BEDRIN's challenge. KAZANTSEV stated that he had wanted to take a week leave, but in deference to BEDRIN's wishes, KAZANTSEV remained during the rest of the class, although his presence was somewhat of a disruptive factor. Later during the class, LIROCKET-1 had KAZANTSEV and BEDRIN ask each other questions in English - an exercise which KAZANTSEV enjoyed in that his English is superior to BEDRIN's. However, BEDRIN rose to the occasion, comporting himself in a fine manner, and there ensued a lively exchange of questions and answers on non-controversial topics.\n\n10. GONCHARENKO was absent from class from 10 August to 19 September. During this period he was on home leave.\n\n11. On 19 September GONCHARENKO returned to class and LIROCKET-1 complimented him on his improved English facility. GONCHARENKO stated that he had worked diligently on his English during this summer vacation. During the period 19 September to 7 December, GONCHARENKO did not attend classes regularly.\n12. BEDRIN was absent from class from 10 August to 19 September. During this period he was on home leave.\n\n13. On 19 September, BEDRIN returned to class and commented that he had not looked at his English lessons since August. BEDRIN related that he had spent most of his vacation in the Leningrad area which is his home as well as his wife's.\n\n14. On 21 September the subject of conversation turned to alcoholic beverages. BEDRIN stated that he couldn't drink vodka like he used to as it gives him too much of a hangover the following day. BEDRIN stated that he preferred whisky (Canadian Club and Seagram's) to any other drink.\n\n15. During the classroom discussion of books on 10 October, LIROCKET-1 noted that BEDRIN has somewhat of an obsession with books of a pornographic nature. BEDRIN had previously remarked to LIROCKET-1 that he enjoys a good spicy story and that during a 1966 layover in Brussels, he sought out and enjoyed viewing a number of sex movies.\n\n16. On 12 October, LIROCKET-1 commented that he might visit the States during the last of October. BEDRIN, privately, asked LIROCKET-1 to purchase for him two 7 inch reel recording tapes and two 8 inch reel tapes. BEDRIN said that \"another friend\" had brought him some tapes in the past. This was the first time BEDRIN had ever requested LIROCKET-1 to perform any personal favor. On 31 October BEDRIN canceled the order relating that he did not need the requested tapes inasmuch as a \"friend\" had purchased some Grundig tapes for him while in the US.\n\n17. On 16 November, BEDRIN strongly advised KAZANTSEV to remain for his class rather than skipping it. (See KAZANTSEV, 16 November incident).\n\n18. Valentin Mikhailovich KORNYUKHIN (201-774727) began classes on 21 November, in the company of KAZANTSEV. KORNYUKHIN possesses good, fluent English although his grammar is somewhat unpolished. He speaks with a decidedly British accent. KORNYUKHIN stated that he had been in Mexico for approximately five months and had served previously in Burma from approximately 1962-65. After his assignment in Burma, KORNYUKHIN had worked in Moscow (1965-67). KORNYUKHIN appears to be between 35 and 40 years of age, blonde hair, trim, athletic appearing approximately 6 feet tall and weighing between 165-170 pounds.\n\n19. On 23 November, KAZANTSEV and KORNYUKHIN studied together. During the lesson a slight difference of opinion arose between the two over what their government's position was during the 1964 Cyprus crisis. The exchange reflected the obdurate, somewhat dogmatic character of KORNYUKHIN. LIROCKET-1 characterized KORNYUKHIN as\npossessing very strong and fixed ideas. KORNYUKHIN did not appear to be swayed by KAZANTSEV's official position and spoke openly and forcefully to him.\n\n20. On 29 November, during the course of a discussion, KAZANTSEV and KORNYUKHIN again became embroiled in an animated debate. KORNYUKHIN debated KAZANTSEV in an effective and energetic manner seemingly unafraid of correcting or disputing KAZANTSEV. The argument was not personal nor was there any apparent evidence of rancor between the two.\n\n21. On 7 December, KORNYUKHIN studied along with LIROCKET-1. LIROCKET-1 soon discovered that KORNYUKHIN was somewhat of a chameleon in his personality in that he was completely different without the presence of KAZANTSEV. KORNYUKHIN manifested a friendly, affable, and responsive manner, gratefully accepting any criticism from LIROCKET-1 regarding his use of the language and giving up all pretensions of being a hard-nosed personality. LIROCKET-1 garnered the impression that KORNYUKHIN wants to be liked and that his character ambivalence may be a front in order to impress KAZANTSEV. During their conversation, KORNYUKHIN commented that he was having some difficulty in adjusting to Mexico and its weather. In discussing India, KORNYUKHIN stated that India was better off than China, but that the Indians were unmanageable, unorganized, and uncontrollable. KORNYUKHIN stated that he was more impressed with Burma than either India or Mexico.\n\nMISCELLANEOUS\n\n22. During the 28 September class, LIROCKET-1 was sought out by Yergent Nikolayevich GORLITSYN (201-775422) who began talking to LIROCKET-1 in fairly adequate English, capable of making a conversation. GORLITSYN commented that he preferred to study his English along rather than in a class with a tutor. GORLITSYN also stated that he would be required to take his English exam in the near future and that he would hermetically seal himself off for one week while he prepared for it. GORLITSYN stated that he wanted \"to maintain his 20% bonus\" by passing the English exam. LIROCKET-1 views GORLITSYN as somewhat of a bumpkin, not particularly intelligent, but a plodder. He appears to be a loner in his relationships with others of the same nationality.\n\n23. During this same class, Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412) spoke briefly with LIROCKET-1. LOGINOV asked LIROCKET-1 if he would have time to teach English to his eight-year-old son. LIROCKET-1 stated that the hours requested by LOGINOV for lessons would be impossible to accommodate. LOGINOV then began talking of his love for sports and his background as a former judge in Olympic skiing as well as referring to various other sports including tennis. LOGINOV's English is good, although not as fluent as KAZANTSEV's. LOGINOV's problem seems to be a lack of practice. LIROCKET-1 characterized LOGINOV as a highly perceptive individual with a keen sense of intelligence.\nFUTURE PLANNING\n\n24. Future planning: LIROCKET-1 will continue to teach at the Soviet Embassy, Mexico two days per week for a total of five hours. His work appears to be quite satisfactory and he is apparently well regarded as a teacher by the Soviet Embassy. LIROCKET-1 assesses KORNYUKHIN as the most interesting pupil with whom he is in contact and, accordingly, intends to concentrate his efforts toward establishing a social rapport with KORNYUKHIN which will lead to an exchange of visits. LIROCKET-1 has been given several Personality Assessment Questionnaires for use in recording observable behavioral patterns in his students.\nSECRET 2023332 CITE MEXICO CITY 3872\n\nDIRECTOR INFO JMWAVE\n\nSENSITIZED\n\nREF MEXICO CITY 2785 (11/11/23)\n\n1. Lienjoy coverage Soviet Embassy produced several items in last few months showing that employee Mexican Foreign Ministry later identified as Carlos Sandoval y Nucino who took care of Mexican visas for Communist nationals was on very friendly personal terms with Soviet diplomats Pavel A. Yatskov and Valentin S. Logvinov. Both KGB. Although Sandoval must have dealt with Cubans, there is no indication he developed friendship with local Cuban officials.\n\n2. Station was becoming interested in Sandoval as possible asset against local Soviets when Sandoval, per Lienjoy, informed Ogino 24 Nov he was being transferred to Mexican Embassy, Havana. Lienjoy surveillance on Liring-2 spotted latter at church ceremony (he stood outside) and reception Sandoval's wedding Dec to Lucia Blakeley. Soviets, however, did not appear in attendance. Sandoval left for Havana with wife 11 Dec.\n\n3. Station somewhat puzzled at sudden appearance Liring-2 and absence of Soviets at Sandoval wedding. Lifeat coverage\n\nSECRET\n\n31. 365412\nSANDOVAL HOME 4 TO 14 DEC SHOWED HIS PARENTS VERY ANTI-COMMUNIST AND THOROUGHLY UNHAPPY AT SON'S CUBAN ASSIGNMENT, HOPING HE WILL NOT BRING BACK \"THOSE CUBAN IDEAS.\"\n\n4. BECAUSE OF LISAGA OPERATION, STATION WILL MAKE NO EFFORT TO ESTABLISH CONTACT WITH SANDOVAL FOR POSSIBLE UNILATERAL EXPLOITATION. AS IT POSSIBLE, HOWEVER, THAT SANDOVAL WAS BEING DEVELOPED OPERATIONALLY BY SOVIETS, WHO MAY CONTINUE DEVELOP HIM IN CUBA. PLAN BRIEF LISAGA ON SANDOVAL AFTER CHECKING WITH LIELEGANT.\nSECRET 171740Z CITE MEXICO CITY 3524\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\n1. SUBJECT IS ELIZABETH DUNCAN WILDE, LATE FORTIES, PO BOX 425, SPRING LAKE, NEW JERSEY. NO STATION OR EMBASSY TRACES.\n\n2. ON 16 NOV SUBJECT WALKED INTO EMBASSY AND WAS INTERVIEWED BY POLITICAL OFFICER. SUBJECT SAID SHE IN CONTACT VALENTIN LOGINOV (201-285412) WHOM SHE MET DURING LAST 3 OR 4 WEEKS FOR FIRST TIME. SAID SHE MET HIM SOCIALLY THROUGH A FRIEND WHO SHE SAID WAS GERMAN WRITER AND REFUSED TO NAME HIM. LOGINOV SAID HE WANTED TO TAKE ENGLISH LESSONS FROM SUBJECT (A STANDARD PLOY WITH HIM WHEN MEETING AMERICANS). LATER LOGINOV TOLD HER HE WANTS TO \"GO OVER TO THE OTHER SIDE\". SHE SUGGESTED HE CONTACT THE EMBASSY. HE ANSWERED HE AFRAID TO AND DOESN'T KNOW HOW. SHE ASKED HIM IF HE WANTED HER TO CONTACT EMBASSY FOR HIM. HE SAID YES, IF SHE COULD DO IT TACTFULLY. SHE CLAIMS SHE WALKED IN WITH HIS KNOWLEDGE. HE ALSO MENTIONED HAS A PROBLEM WITH HIS MOTHER AND SISTER IN THE USSR. SUBJECT SAID SHE LEAVING MEXICO\n\nSECRET 201-285412\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 3524 SECRET\n\n17 NOV BY AIR FOR SAN ANTONIO TO PICK-UP HER CAR AND PROCEED TO NEW YORK. SAID SHE WAS IN SAN FRANCISCO ONE MONTH AGO AND UPON RETURNING LEFT CAR IN SAN ANTONIO AND FLEW TO MEXICO. SHE SAW LOGINOV LAST AT PARTY ON 15 NOV. DOESN'T KNOW IF WILL CONTACT LOGINOV BEFORE LEAVING. ALTHOUGH SHE HAD HIS CARD WITH EMBASSY PHONE NUMBER, SHE SAID LOGINOV TOLD HER NOT TO CALL HIM THERE SINCE BOTH AMERICAN AND SOVIET EMBASSY PHONES ARE BUGGED. HE ADDED THAT SOVIET EMBASSY BUGS ITS OWN PHONES. THUS CONTACT TO LOGINOV HAS TO BE THROUGH MUTUAL FRIENDS. SHE STATED SHE RETURNING MEXICO 13 DEC AND PROMISED TO RECONTACT THE POLITICAL OFFICER.\n\n3. SUBJECT WAS RELUCTANT TO START TALKING ABOUT LOGINOV, REFUSED TO NAME GERMAN AND OTHER MUTUAL FRIENDS BECAUSE THEY ARE MEXICAN LEFTISTS AND DIDN'T WANT TO RAT ON THEM. SHE REFUSED TO STAY LONG ENOUGH FOR POLITICAL OFFICER TO CONTACT STATION. SHE APPEARS TO BE CONVINCED THAT LOGINOV IS SERIOUS ABOUT DEFECTING. POLITICAL OFFICER DESCRIBED HER AS RATIONAL PERSON.\n\n4. ABOUT HERSELF SUBJECT SAID SHE LIVED IN MEXICO FOR TWO YEARS (NO DATES) WHEN SHE RAN A CLINIC FOR OBESE PEOPLE\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 3524 S E C R E T\n\nWHICH FOLDED. THEN RETURNED US WHERE MARRIED FOR SECOND TIME.\n\nSHE COMES TO MEXICO OFTEN AND ALWAYS STAYS WITH A MEXICAN\n\nDOCTOR, NAME FORGOTTEN BY POLITICAL OFFICER. THUS NO WAY TO\n\nCONTACT HER HERE. THIS DOCTOR IS WIDOWER AND OWNS A HOSPITAL.\n\nPOLITICAL OFFICER SUSPECTS THEY LIVE TOGETHER. SHE INTIMATED\n\nSHE IS WEALTHY AND LOOKS AND ACTS LIKE SHE IS.\n\n5. LOGINOV'S ONLY GERMAN CONTACT KNOWN TO STATION IS\n\nRALPH WIEGANDT, 19 MARCH 1931 IN VIENNA, AUSTRIA, GERMAN\n\nCITIZEN. WORKED RIEBOLT CHEMICAL IN GERMANY PRIOR TO\n\nENTERING MEXICO IN MAY 55. NOW MANAGER AND AT LEAST PART\n\nOWNER OF FIRM MANUFACTURING PLASTIC FOAM INSULATING MATERIAL.\n\nCONTACT APPEARS TO BE SOCIAL AND BEGAN AT SPORTS CLUB WHERE\n\nBOTH MEMBERS. SOURCES LIRGAN-1, LIENVY AND GOBERNACION\n\nFILE.\n\n6. STATION HAS ARRANGEMENTS WITH POLITICAL OFFICER TO\n\nINTERVIEW SUBJECT AS SOON AS SHE REAPPEARS. ALTHOUGH ABOVE\n\nSKETCHY AND VERY INCOMPLETE AND LOGINOV IS ONE OF LAST LOCAL\n\nSOVIETS STATION WOULD EXPECT TO DEFECT, STILL SOVIETS IN\n\nTROUBLE HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO TAKE MORE UNORTHODOX STEPS.\n\nWOULD ALSO NOT DISCOUNT POSSIBILITY THIS IS PROVOCATION ON\nPAGE 4 MEXICO CITY 3524 SECRET\nLOGINOV'S PART. WHATEVER HIS NOTIVE, IF SUBJECT'S STORY HOLDS WATER, FEEL CONTROL OVER HER ASAP MOST DESIRABLE. SINCE THERE ARE SEVERAL FLIGHTS TO SAN ANTONIO A DAY, IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCOMPANY HER FROM MEXICO AND FEEL IT UNADVISABLE TO TRY TO INTERCEPT AND DEBRIEF HER AT AIRPORT. THEREFORE HQS MAY WISH TO CONSIDER CONTACTING AND DEBRIEFING HER AT HER HOME. SHE SAID WILL DRIVE FROM SAN ANTONIO TO NEW YORK. PLS ADVISE.\n\n7. REQUEST TRACES ON SUBJECT AND WIEGANDT.\nSECRET\nSECRET 192843Z CITE MEXICO CITY 3291 19 OCT 67 IN 75783\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDTOP LCIMPROVE\n\n1. PER LIENVOY ON 17 OCT FOREIGN OFFICE OFFICIAL TOLD LOGINOV HE RECEIVED A CABLE FROM MEXEMB IN MOSCOW ASKING FOR VISA FOR OLEG M. NECHIPORENKO (201-335370) WHO IS REPLACING YATSKOV. LOGINOV ASKED HIM TO EXPEDITE VISA SINCE \"WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR IT FOR SEVERAL DAYS\". OFFICIAL ASKS WHEN YATSKOV IS LEAVING. LOGINOV ANSWERS HE CAN'T LEAVE UNTIL AFTER NECHIPORENKO ARRIVES.\n\n2. BOTH LOGINOV AND PRIKHODKO ON RETURN FROM RESPECTIVE HOME LEAVES TOLD LICOZY-5 THAT NECHIPORENKO WOULD RETURN TO MEXICO IN OCTOBER. BOTH SAID THAT HE WOULD NOT RETURN TO CONSULAR WORK BUT WOULD BE GIVEN OTHER WORK IN THE EMBASSY. NOTE THAT YATSKOV ON RETURN FROM HOME LEAVE IN SEPT 66 QUIT HIS CONSULAR JOB AND \"HAS GIVEN OTHER WORK IN THE EMBASSY\" PER LOGINOV TO LICOZY-5.\n\n3. IN VIEW ABOVE AND ABSENCE OTHER CANDIDATES, IT APPEARS NECHIPORENKO WILL TAKE OVER YATSKOV'S KGR JOB.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nChief, SB Division\nChief, WH Division; COS, Caracas\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nNikolay Dmitriyevich CHERNYSHEV, Repatriate from Venezuela\n\n1. According to LIENVOY on 4 September 1967, Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412), Consul of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City placed a call to Havana, Cuba stating that he had in Mexico a family of 5 persons that had to be sent from Cuba to Odessa by boat. LOGINOV said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had ordered that their passage be paid to the border of the USSR. The family name was given as CHERNYSHEV. According to LOGINOV the family had been given permission to live in Groznyy in the USSR by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.\n\n2. On 7 September 1967, LICZY-5 reported that LOGINOV had booked passage to Cuba for a Russian emigre, Nikolay CHERNYSHEV and his family. CHERNYSHEV's wife was born in Italy and his three children Igor, Nataliya and Sergey were all born in Venezuela. LOGINOV also stated to LICZY-5 that the CHERNYSHEVS were repatriates from Venezuela.\n\n3. Plans to send the CHERNYSHEV family to the USSR via Cuba were apparently changed because LIFIRE reported their departure for the USSR via Montreal via Canadian Pacific Airlines Flight 582 on 28 September 1967. The following information on the CHERNYSHEV family was available from the LIFIRE report:\n\n......continued\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/BB\n2 - C/WB\n2 - COS, Caracas\n\nHUMA-33265\n11 October 1967\nSECRET\n200-4-64\nNikolay Dmitriyevich Chernyshev, Age given as 48. Venezuelan Citizen since 1955. Born in Yuzaburgo, Estonia. His occupation was given as Mechanic. His address in Caracas, Venezuela was given as La Costanera Caraballeda. He travelled on Venezuelan Passport 287722. He and his family had been issued Mexican visa (valid for 180 days) in Caracas, Venezuela on 6 September 1967.\n\nLaura OFERRARA Strizzi Chernyshev, wife of Subject. Age given as 42. Citizenship given as Italian and apparently travelling on Italian Passport 1091.\n\nIgor Nikolayevich Chernyshev, son, 12 years old, travelling on his father's passport.\n\nNataliya Nikolayevna Chernyshev, daughter, 11 years old, travelling on father's passport.\n\nSergey Nikolayevich Chernyshev, son, 8 years old, travelling on father's passport.\n\nCitizenship for all three children was given as Venezuelan.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\nREFERENCE: HMMA-32616, 25 July 1967\n\nSubject and his family returned to Mexico City from home leave in the USSR on KLM Flight 684 arriving 27 August 1967 (Source LIFIRE). The LOGINOV family travelled on the same flight as the Mikhail Mikhailovich DYAKONOV (201-793094) family and Lyudmila Aleksandrovna KARABACH (wife of 201-787785). Subject travelled on Soviet Diplomatic Passport D-010264 and his wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyevna and son, Dmitriy travelled on Soviet Diplomatic D-010265. Per reference the LOGINOV family departed Mexico on home leave 16 July 1967.\n\nGrace H. Farnsworth\nfor Willard C. CURTIS\n\nSR TRAVEL INPUT PROGRAM\n\nDistribution:\n12 - C/SB\n2 - C/WH\n\nCS COPY\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nHMMA-33028\n11 September 1967\nSECRET\n201-285412\nSECRET\n\nRIO DE JANEIRO\nINFO: BUENOS AIRES\n\nREDTOP AEASSAULT\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 34352*\n\n1. INITIAL PRESS RELEASE NAMES VICTOR VIZGUNOV AS KGB OFFICER WHO MET LOGINOV (SUBJ OF REF) WHILE LATTER CAIRO. AIRMAILING CLIPS TO RONALD WARNER SOON AS RECD FROM PRETORIA.\n\n2. IF STATION CONCURS, SUGGEST HINT TO ALAGORAS SINCE VIZGUNOV EXPOSED WOULD BE EFFECTIVE PROP PLAY IF THEY WOULD CONTACT ALMITTEN AND SUGGEST HE \"REVEAL TO PRESS\" HIS EXPERIENCE WITH VIZGUNOV WHILE IN CAIRO.\n\n3. RIO DE JANEIRO: ABOVE SUGGESTION DEPENDENT ON EFFECT STATION FEELS SUCH EXPOSE WOULD HAVE ON CURRENT WOFAC RELATIONSHIP.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n*Spy story broke in Sb African press 9 Sep 67.\n\nC/SB/CI/P: T JUICE\nSB/CI/K: \nSB/O/WH: \nWH/5: \nWH/4: \n\nWH/COPS: \n\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nForwarded herewith are character sketches prepared by Douglas J. FEINGLASS on the following Soviet consular officers stationed in Mexico City:\n\nValentin Sergeevich LOGINOV (201-285412)\nVladislav Sergeevich KORMUSHKIN (201-744341)\nVladimir Ivanovich SHPAKEVICH (201-343894)\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\n\nAttachments:\nSketches\n\nDistribution:\n1 - C/BB, w/atts.\n2 - C/WH, w/o/atts.\nTHE CONSULAR SECTION OF THE USSR EMBASSY IN MEXICO CITY\n\nThe consular section consists of three persons:\nValentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV - consul (third secretary)\nVladislav Sergeyevich KORUSKIN - vice consul (Attache)\nVladimir Ivanovich SHPAKEVICH - vice consul (third secretary)\n\nWith such a seeming-scarcity of work for the Consulate, it would be sufficient to have only one man for it. But the Soviet Embassy has to have three men handling consular duties. The Consulate is open to visitors twice a week and only two hours a day. Even that is too much for an occasional person who desires a visa for visiting the USSR. However, in addition to their regular duties, the consuls have to arrange various matters relating to visiting Soviet cargo vessels, artistic and cultural groups, etc. On several occasions, they had to do many errands outside of their overt field of activity. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why, in many instances, they cannot be reached on the telephone. All three of them speak fluent Spanish and have no difficulty in getting around and acquiring Mexican friends. Given below are their respective character sketches.\n\nConsul LOGINOV is a rather recent arrival (two years in Mexico) and not very experienced in his job. However, he is learning the ropes quite rapidly and carries a lot of weight among the Embassy staff. LOGINOV is the one who orders cars\nto be sent for any visiting dignitary or a performer. He, apparently, scrutinizes and approves the names of doctors and dentists patronized by the Embassy personnel. Recently a Man on Duty said over the phone that LOGINOV had forbidden to be given out the address of a German dentist, whom the Soviets visited quite frequently before.\n\nLOGINOV is also in charge of making up a duty roster for appointing a Man on Duty who would be responsible for anything that took place at the Embassy on that particular day. No one, except the ambassador, seems to be exempt from that duty. On a few occasions LOGINOV encountered hostility to his arbitrary manner of making up the duty roster. Thus, when a Man on Duty called Nikolay Sergeyevich LOGINOV, Press Attach\u00e9 and a (former?) Cultural Officer, and told him that LOGINOV put his name down as the responsible Man on Duty for the Embassy for that day, LOGINOV said that he was very busy and let LOGINOV do it himself.\n\nObviously LOGINOV had made a number of secret enemies with his dictatorial manners and his disdainful, monotonous, and slow way of talking. His medium- to high-pitched voice sounds as if he is extremely bored with the world and asks his interlocutor a favor just by talking to him.\n\nHis physical appearance seems to confirm that impression. A few newspaper photos show him as a youngish and rather good-looking individual with curly light-brown hair and with\na continuous smile on his lips. Unquestionably, his type of charm appeals to elderly ladies and LOGINOV is quite aware that he is attractive to the other sex. Without a doubt, he tries to capitalize on it and with his fluent Spanish probably tries to ensnare Mexican females. There is no indication that LOGINOV has tried anything of the sort with the Soviet wives. One of the reasons may be that he would not like his wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyeva, a very formidable woman indeed, to get wind of it. On the other hand, the Mexican woman may seem to be more exotic and attractive to LOGINOV than his own countrywomen, in especial his wife, who is a large unattractive female.\n\nNevertheless, LOGINOV seems to be quite pleasant, with a nice cultured voice, and gets along with her husband well thanks to her good humour and social activity. She has been quite prominent in Nestkom work and in the children's summer camp. Shortly after their arrival, LOGINOV bought a tape-recorder for his wife for 115 dollars. Whether it was to be used for music, or other purposes, has not been determined.\n\nOnce in a while, LOGINOV goes on drunken sprees. Thus, on 12 February 1966, he and KORUSHKIN drove us to the embassy gate at three a.m., pounded on the gate, blew their horn and had altercations with Stanislav Sergeyevich SELINOV, who was on duty at that time.\nAnother very prominent trait of LOGINOV's character is his extreme chauvinism, bordering on jingoism. In reference to other nationalities, LOGINOV uses such deprecatory epithets as: \"Amerikashki\", \"Chidovka\", \"Yamchura\", etc.\n\nIt is doubtful if LOGINOV has any true friends. His sneering attitude is probably the reason for it. Although he made several errors in judgment in his work and social behaviour, LOGINOV by no means is a fool and should be kept in mind for any possible developments.\n\nVLADISLAV SERGEYOVICH KORUSHKIN, vice consul (Attach\u00e9), is a young man about thirty-three years of age, rather stocky, with blond wavy hair over a high forehead. A pair of heavy-rimmed glasses gives him the appearance of a very intellectual person. On the whole, KORUSHKIN has the air of an easy-going fellow, who can make friends almost overnight. KORUSHKIN and his wife are exceptionally close friends with ANATOLIY VLADIMIROVICH KARASCH, employee of the Commercial Office, and his wife. Both families visit each other quite frequently.\n\nBesides occasional drinking bouts, KORUSHKIN has not been known to practice any skirt-chasing, since his wife, INNA NIKOLAYEVNA, is not a bad-looking woman herself, and both seem to be getting along smoothly. KORUSHKIN is a practicing physician at the Embassy and is quite in demand.\nwhenever any of the Soviets or his family is ill. KORUSHKIN is also quite active in consular affairs and does most of the leg work for LOGINOV. He is also very active in Red Cross functions, where he is in charge of the Children's section. KORUSHKIN is quite an amiable, energetic and pushy individual and can be quite rude and nasty at times. Undoubtedly, he is looking forward to being a full-fledged consul in time to come. The impression of KORUSHKIN'S ambition and pushy trait in his character is intensified by the sound of his rapid and energetic but pleasant baritone voice.\n\nA curious fact should be cited here. Shortly after his arrival, KORUSHKIN purchased a tape-recorder for 165 dollars or 70 dollars more than the one bought by his \"boss\" LOGINOV. Why?\n\nIt seems that in the future, KORUSHKIN may slow down somewhat, but his inner drive and energy will nevertheless make him a more adroit and skillful individual. His further progress should be watched with interest and caution.\n\nVladimir Ivanovich SHPAKOVICH, vice-consul (third secretary) seems to be able to handle any job that comes along. Previously he was mentioned as an assistant Cultural Attach\u00e9, then substituted for the Press Attach\u00e9, while that position remained vacant, and quite recently, while the two consuls are on leave, he has started calling himself \"consul\".\nSHPAKEVICH is of very ordinary appearance, of slight build and dark complexion and is unmarked by any outstanding features, with the exception of a noticeably receding hairline. He wears glasses sometimes. His voice is even pleasing than his looks. It has the unusual chameleon peculiarity of sounding like someone else's. Even SHPAKEVICH'S closest friends cannot recognize his voice at times and he delights in taking advantage of it. Occasionally SHPAKEVICH would call a friend on the phone and start talking in rapid Spanish. When the friend is duly confused and does not know what to say, SHPAKEVICH breaks into an explosive guffaw that somehow lacks true merriment. Since SHPAKEVICH repeats this crude joke time after time it is obvious that his sense of humour is quite rudimentary.\n\nOrdinarily SHPAKEVICH is a cautious individual who dislikes making decisions of importance. He said that he was getting clobbered whenever a decision was wrong. However, SHPAKEVICH can be quite impertinent at the wrong moment and with the wrong person. Thus, when attached to the dancer, PLISETSKAYA'S group as an interpreter in Puebla, SHPAKEVICH called the Embassy about some trivial matter and wanted to talk to ambassador BAZAROV. A man on duty told him that BAZAROV was taking his mid-afternoon rest and was not to be bothered. But SHPAKEVICH persisted in his desire to talk to BAZAROV. Finally BAZAROV took the phone and when he\nFound out what SHPAKEVICH wanted to tell him, BAZAROV gave him a verbal lashing that actually sizzled. Nevertheless, later SHPAKEVICH called again and asked for the ambassador. The Man on Duty, Ivan Fedorovich SOLOVATIN, told SHPAKEVICH, \"Ah, he roasted you and no before for disturbing his rest and now you want some more of it?\" But SHPAKEVICH was not to be put off and SOLOVATIN with a sigh buzzed BAZAROV again. At first BAZAROV was angry but later calmed down and discussed with SHPAKEVICH the well-being of PLISETSKAYA and her group. The above incident may characterize SHPAKEVICH in American vernacular as a \"pest\" and a \"jerk\". Both expressions describe his true nature quite well.\n\nIt is doubtful if this one-time assistant of the cultural attach\u00e9 had any extensive schooling. Such inadmissible expressions as, for instance, \"Ya khochu doloshit'ya\" is a clear indication of his low educational level.\n\nBut with all his shortcomings, SHPAKEVICH is probably well liked by the majority of the Soviets. He is easy to get along with, especially with his friends. His closest friends are the families of the Soviet correspondents, the KUZMINYS and the SOLOVYS, and he is also very intimate with Leonid Ksilyevich (Leenka) KUZMINOV, Intourist representative. Sometimes both of them get together with the aim of draining a bottle of cognac. However, there was\nno indication that SHPAKEVICH was ever vicious or dead drunk. He is neither a skirt-chaser, although with his fluent Spanish and a human tank for a wife, SHPAKEVICH would be justified in investigating greener pastures among the Mexican women. But he is decidedly devoid of any imagination.\n\nDespite her great bulk, SHPAKEVICH's wife, Tatyana Ivanovna, seems to be a very amiable person and all the Soviet wives agree that she is very \"nice\". Tatyana is two years SHPAKEVICH's junior, but she acts like a protective mother hen towards him. She has high blood pressure and that was probably why she left for Moscow over a month ago. Consequently SHPAKEVICH is here all by himself for the present and some of his friends, who refer to him simply as \"SHPA\", invite him occasionally for dinner or lunch.\n\nYet SHPAKEVICH can also hurt some people's feelings with his callous indifference. Once, when Nina Atanasyevna NIKITINA, wife of the film's representative, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich, begged SHPAKEVICH to drive her home from the Embassy, since she was dead tired after running errands for the Nekton, SHPAKEVICH told her in an indifferent manner that he had no desire to do so and walked away. NIKITINA was so hurt by SHPAKEVICH's attitude that she cried in the street on her way home. Acts of this nature cannot endear him to some people and by all indications, SHPAKEVICH does not seem\nto be a very bright individual. Thus, he is being used for any conceivable job that presents itself, but only in the capacity of a temporary stop-gap, as an interpreter, or even as an errand-boy.\nSECRET\n\nChief, WH Division\n\nChief, SB Division\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nREDCOAT/LEIMPROVE/LIROBBIN\n\nLIROBBIN-1 and -2 Progress Report, November 1966 - July 1967\n\n1. The Station continued to maintain contact with the LIROBBINs during the reporting period for the dual purpose of monitoring their relations with the Soviets and using them as sources of information on their heterogeneous social circle. Dwindling contact between the Soviets and the LIROBBINs since March suggests, however, that the Soviets may have lost their earlier interest in the couple.\n\n2. LIROBBIN-1 and -2 had the following contact with the Soviets during the reporting period:\n\n7 November: LIROBBIN-1 and -2 attended the 7 November Soviet Embassy celebration at the invitation of Aleksandr V. PRIKHODKO (201-202739).\n\n20 November: LIROBBIN-1 and -2 attended a Soviet film showing at the Foreign Press Club put on by PRIKHODKO and Vladimir A. DOLGOV (201-763035).\n\n24 November: LIROBBIN-1 and -2 and PRIKHODKO were among the guests at a Thanksgiving dinner given by Pearl GONZALEZ.\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/WH\n2 - C/BB\n\nSECRET\n\nHMMA-32761\n\n201-789387\n201-789388\n\n10 August 1967\n1 December: LIOBEBIN-1 bumped into PRIKRODO in a coffee shop in the vicinity of several boys' schools. PRIKRODO appeared to be deeply engaged in conversation with an unidentified Mexican boy who appeared to be about 20 years old and a student. PRIKRODO greeted LIOBEBIN-1, but neither introduced the boy nor asked LIOBEBIN-1 to join them. PRIKRODO was still talking with the boy when LIOBEBIN-1 left.\n\nEarly December: At the invitation of PRIKRODO and Valentin I. KUCHEROV (201-738017), LIOBEBIN-1 and -2 attended a reception in honor of the Bolshoi Ballet at the Soviet Embassy.\n\n3 February: LIOBEBIN-1 and -2 and their daughter attended a dinner and film showing at the Soviet films office along with another American couple the LIOBEBINs had introduced to PRIKRODO. PRIKRODO and KUCHEROV were the hosts.\n\n15 February: LIOBEBIN-1 and -2 met Valentin S. LOGINOV (201-285412), for the first time, at an Indian Embassy reception.\n\n16 February: At LOGINOV's invitation, LIOBEBIN-2 attended a Consular Corps gathering at the Soviet Embassy. LIOBEBIN-1 had left for the United States that morning. PRIKRODO and KUCHEROV both appeared genuinely surprised at seeing LIOBEBIN-2 and learning that she knew LOGINOV. LOGINOV, for his part, also seemed surprised that PRIKRODO and KUCHEROV knew LIOBEBIN-2.\n\n17 February: KUCHEROV came over to LIOBEBIN-2's apartment during the afternoon with an invitation to the Soviet Army Day reception which he had promised on 10 February to deliver personally. As KUCHEROV knew, LIOBEBIN-1 had left for the U.S. KUCHEROV invited himself in for several drinks and stayed for two hours talking about nothing. At one point he noticed a scratch on LIOBEBIN-2's knee and used the opportunity to administer a sympathetic caress which wound up going down the length of her leg. He did not attempt to follow up this amorous gambit, however, and finally left with nothing more than a good-bye bear hug.\n\n23 February: LIOBEBIN-2 attended the Soviet Army Day Reception at the Soviet Embassy, where she talked primarily with PRIKRODO, KUCHEROV, and LOGINOV. She also spoke briefly with LOGINOV, who invited her to go along on a Consular Corps tour of the Mexican Horse Show.\n\n3 March: LIOBEBIN-2 went on the tour of the Horse Show, during which she talked with LOGINOV for about 25 minutes.\n31 March: LIROBBIN-2 telephoned PRIKHOZKO about a week in advance and invited him to dinner on this date. He accepted, but failed to show up and never called to apologize.\n\n13 July: LIROBBIN-2 met LOGINOV at an Indian Embassy reception. During a brief conversation with him he told her he was about to leave for the USSR on vacation and that PRIKHOZKO would be doing the same later in the month.\n\n3. As can be seen from the above rundown, none of the LIROBBINS' Soviet contacts have made any effort to see them since early March, and PRIKHOZKO even missed a dinner party without so much as calling to apologize. It therefore appears that the LIROBBINS have at least temporarily been put on the shelf by the Soviets, if not dropped altogether. We expect to get a more definite reading in the fall, when the large number of Soviets now on vacation, including PRIKHOZKO and LOGINOV, have returned and the Soviets have resumed their normal routines.\n\n4. In the course of the reporting period, the LIROBBINS also provided information on 14 non-Soviet acquaintances of interest to the Station.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\n1. LIFIRE reports the departure for Moscow via New York and Paris of Subject, his wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyevna and their son, Dmitriy, aboard Air France Flight 700 on 16 July 1967. Subject traveled on Diplomatic Passport D-010264. Subject's wife and son travelled on Diplomatic Passport D-010265. Also travelling with the LOGINOV family was Tatyana Borisovna MALAKHOVICH, eight-year-old daughter of Boris Aleksandrovich MALAKHOVICH (201-767974), Employee of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City, who travelled on LOGINOV's Diplomatic Passport D-010265.\n\n2. Sources indicate that the LOGINOVs departed on home leave. On 12 July 1967 LIROBIN-2 reported that LOGINOV mentioned that he was going on vacation in the USSR on 16 July. On 15 June 1967, LICOZY-5 reported that LOGINOV had also mentioned to him that he was going on vacation in the USSR in July. LIENVOY indicated that Subject and his wife were leaving on 16 July 1967 with a three-day stopover in Paris, France.\n\nDistribution:\n1/2 - C/SB\n1 - C/WH\n\nCR TRAVEL INPUT PROGRAM\n\n07 Aug\n1967\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nB201-767974\n\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\nHMMA-32616\n\nDATE\n25 July 1967\n\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\n\nNO FILE NUMBER\n201-285412\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, WH Division\n\nREDACT/POA for Subject of Reference\n\nAction Required: Submission of PRQ Parts I and II.\n\nReference: MEXICO CITY-1638, 3 June 1967\n\nA Provisional Operational Approval was granted for use of Subject of reference as an access agent to the Subject of 201-295412 (MB Officer in Mexico City). Please submit PRQ Parts I and II in order that a full Operational Approval can be requested.\n\nLaura J. Uttinger\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 1 - COS, Mexico City\n\n201-295412\n\n10 July 1967\n\nSECRET\n\nWH/1 J. Zerance Jfr 4167\n\n1 - RT\n1 - Chrono\n1 - SB/WH\n\nSubject of ref: Miriam AVITA-Katz\n\nC/WH/1 W. J. Kaufman\nSubject: LIEFEX reports, 5, 6, 7, 8.\n\nAttachment:\n\n1. LIEFEX reports, 5, 6, 7.\n2. State copy of LIEFEX passport, 8/7.\n\nDate: 28 April 1977\n\nCS COPY\n2. M. M. reported the arrival on 7 May 1967 via\n\nC. M. C. Jamaica, Professor, no passport number\nrecorded; local address: Calle 37, Mexico, D.F.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\nNombre: ARTECHEA\nEdad: Nacionalidad: Pasaporte:\n\nDimitri DIMITRAC\n\nLlegada: Aerol\u00ednea: JUN 30 1967\n\nSalida: Aerol\u00ednea: Punto de Desembarque:\n\n17 de abril 1967 Cuba 465 Havana\n\nVisa Mexicana Expedida en:\n\n\"Tramita\" o Congreso de P\u00e1ticos\n\nP\u00e1gina: 3280 CS COPY\n| Nombre (p.) | Ciudad | Nacionalidad | Pasaporte |\n|------------|--------|--------------|-----------|\n|            |        |              |           |\n\n| Llegada    | Aerol\u00ednea |\n|------------|-----------|\n|            |           |\n\n| Salida     | Aerol\u00ednea | Punto de Desembarque |\n|------------|-----------|----------------------|\n|            |           |                      |\n\nVisa Mexicana Expedida en:\nSECRET\n\nSECRET 081940Z CITE MEXICO CITY 1707\n\nPRIORITY DIRECTOR INFO PRIORITY PANAMA CITY, MONTERREY (POUCH)\n\nINTEL\n\nSUPDATA: SOURCE RAYMOND A FRADYER FROM SUBJECTS DURING\nCONSULAR OFFICERS MEETING 7 JUNE. NO LIASON.\n\nRI INDEX. REF DIRECTOR 07730.\n\nFILED: 081940Z\n\nS-E-C-R-E-T\n\n201-285-412\nCOUNTRY: USSR/CZECHOSLOVAKIA/EGYPT/ISRAEL\n\nDOI: 7 JUNE 1967\n\nSUBJECT: DISBELIEF EVIDENCED BY SOVIET AND CZECH OFFICIALS OF EGYPTIAN CHARGES OF UNITED STATES INTERVENTION IN NEAR EAST CRISIS\n\nACQ: MEXICO, MEXICO CITY (7 JUNE 67) REPORT NO. HMM-11,179\n\nSOURCE: COMPETENT AMERICAN OBSERVER WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE CONVERSATION WITH THE COMMUNIST OFFICIALS IN QUESTION.\n\n1. DURING INFORMAL CONVERSATION ABOUT THE NEAR EAST CRISIS ON 7 JUNE 1967 VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV, SOVIET CONSUL IN MEXICO CITY AND KNOWN KGB MEMBER, AND JIRI SVESTKA, CZECH CONSUL AND IDENTIFIED MEMBER OF THE CZECH INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, EXHIBITED EVERY INDICATION OF DISBELIEF OF EGYPTIAN CHARGES THAT UNITED STATES' AIRCRAFT HAVE PROVIDED SUPPORT TO ISRAELI FORCES. IN WHAT CAN BE INTERPRETED AS TACIT ADMISSION OF THE FALSITY OF EGYPT'S CHARGES, SVESTKA SAID, \"WELL, ANYTHING GOES DURING WAR.\"\n\n2. FIELD DISSEM: STATE ARMY NAVY AIR FBI CINC SO\n\nREPORT CLASS: CONFIDENTIAL/NO FOREIGN DISSEM\n\nC-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L\nREFERENCE: HUMA-30795, 8 December 1966\n\n1. Transmitted herewith are copies of (a) a sketch of the interior of the gatehouse just inside the front gate of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City and (b) a sketch of the interior of the Reception Room and offices adjoining the gatehouse. Both sketches were prepared by LROCKET-1 and are current as of May 1967. LROCKET-1 has been in the Reception Room approximately 55 times, the gatehouse about 15 times, and the first office twice.\n\n2. Control of Routine Visitors to the Embassy during Business Hours. According to LROCKET-1, traffic through the front gate is essentially controlled by a single guard who operates the gate latch electronically by means of a release button inside the gatehouse. In the course of approximately 125 visits to the Soviet Embassy from January 1966 to the present, LROCKET-1 on occasion has seen as many as three guards in the gatehouse at one time, but there has usually been only one guard present when he has entered and exited the gate (usually about 0915 and 1145, respectively, on Mondays and Fridays prior to mid-January 1967, and about 1530 and 1800 on Tuesdays and Thursdays from mid-January to mid-May 1967). Even when more than one guard has been present, it has appeared that only one of the guards has actually been on duty and that the others have simply been lounging in the gatehouse for want of anything better to do. LROCKET-1 has never seen any of the guards carry arms and has never seen weapons of any kind in the gatehouse. He has seen the following five persons on guard:\n\n- CONTINUED -\n\nAttachments:\n(a) Sketch - Interior gatehouse\n(b) Sketch - Interior Reception Room\n\nDistribution:\n2 - CSR, w/atts., H/W\n1 - ChM, w/atts., H/W\n\nCS COPY\nduty (identified from mug shots): Ivan Petrovich KARCHIN (201-792164), Valentina Georgiyevna MUKHINA, wife of Anatoly Aleksandrovich MUKHIN (201-293944), Stanislav Sergeyevich SILNIKOV (201-271103), Ivan Fedorovich SOLOMATIN (201-307933), and Nikolay Ivanovich ZAKHAROV (201-779288).\n\n3. To gain entry through the foot gate, the would-be visitor presses the white doorbell button to the left of the foot gate. This button rings a buzzer inside the gatehouse. The guard on duty promptly looks through the observation window which directly faces the footgate. If, presumably, the guard is satisfied that the caller or callers do not look dangerous or suspicious, he disengages the gate latch electronically by pressing one of the two release buttons inside the gatehouse. After the gate latch disengages, it is up to the caller to push (or, when the caller is leaving, pull) the gate open and then close it behind him. The gate locks automatically when closed. According to LIROCKET-1, there is a keyhole on the inside of the gate, but there definitely is no keyhole on the outside. LIROCKET-1 has never seen anyone open the gate with a key.\n\n4. LIROCKET-1 has been present in only about five instances when non-Soviets in vehicles have sought admittance through the vehicle gate, which is adjacent to the foot gate. In each of the five instances, the callers have been delivery men whose trucks have apparently been recognized by the guard. In each instance, the truck has pulled up with its nose to the vehicle gate and the guard has walked to the gate and opened it manually. The vehicle gate consists of two doors which open inward. It is secured by one dead bolt from one door to the other. LIROCKET-1 has never noticed a padlock on the gate. After being admitted to the Embassy grounds, the trucks in each case have driven unaccompanied to and parked under the porte-cochere on the north side of the main Embassy building. After closing the gate, the guard has returned to the gatehouse, where - although LIROCKET-1 has never actually observed a guard doing so - he has evidently telephoned someone inside the main building to give notification of the truck's arrival.\n\n5. LIROCKET-1 has been present perhaps 25 times when pedestrian callers (delivery men, students, persons on visa business) have rung the foot gate buzzer, and in each instance the guard has routinely let them in without going to the gate to question them or observe them more closely. On one occasion, as many as four young Mexican males who appeared to be university students rang the buzzer while LIROCKET-1 was inside the gatehouse, and the guard let them in in the routine manner.\n\n6. Once inside the gate, the pedestrian caller is expected to present himself at the gatehouse door, which is usually left open, and state his business. The guard then either goes next door to summon an Embassy official from one of the two offices of the Reception Room, or, as in Subject's case, uses the interphone to call someone inside the main building. (In LIROCKET-1's case, the guard calls one of his Soviet students.) If instructed to have the caller wait, the guard shows him into the Reception Room. LIROCKET-1 himself has been asked to wait in the Reception Room about 35 times. On approximately 15 occasions, he has been invited into the gatehouse by the guard on duty to chat. On the latter occasions, he has either remained in the gatehouse until one of his Soviet students has appeared to escort him into the main building or has left the gatehouse after a few minutes and gone to the Reception Room to continue waiting for one of his students to arrive. On approximately 60 of LIROCKET-1's visits to the Embassy,\nthe guard has been instructed by the person on the other end of the interphone to show LIROCKET-1 to the classroom. (Except for two occasions, the Soviets have always used the first room on the left just inside the main entrance to the main building for Subject's classes.) When the guard does show LIROCKET-1 into the classroom, he leaves the gatehouse for between 1 and 3 minutes (depending on whether he opens the classroom windows). The guard has been alone in the gatehouse about half of the 60 times he has shown Subject into the classroom, and has consequently left the gatehouse unattended for 1-3 minutes on approximately 30 occasions.\n\n7. Offices off the Reception Room. There are two offices off the Reception Room. The first office is known from other sources to be used for visa interviews. The second office is presumably used for the same purpose. The first office opens directly into the Reception Room. The second office is at the back of the first office and is entered either through the first office or through an outside door. (LIROCKET-1 has never seen the outside door used, however.) One or both of the offices were occupied by Soviets about 20% of the roughly 40 times LIROCKET-1 was in the Reception Room prior to mid-January 1967 (usually on Monday and Friday mornings between 0915 and 0930). The Soviets frequently left the door to the first office, and somewhat less frequently to the second office, open when they were present. The first door or both doors were sometimes also left open when no Soviet was present. When the door to the first office or the doors to both offices were open and LIROCKET-1 sat opposite the door to the first office, he could see about a quarter of the interior of the first office and a small part of the interior of the second office. Although official Soviet visa hours are only on Tuesdays and Fridays (from 1100-1300), LIROCKET-1 saw Soviets in both offices with about equal frequency on Monday and Friday mornings. From what LIROCKET-1 could see, the Soviets rarely seemed to be busy with desk work, but confined themselves to looking over newspapers, opening mail, chatting with each other, etc. Frequently Soviets went into one of the offices for just a moment and then left. Since LIROCKET-1 has begun going to the Embassy about 1530 on Tuesdays and Thursdays, however, he has always found the door to the first office shut and both offices evidently empty. (COMMENT: This is probably explained by the fact that the Embassy lunch break is from 1400-1500.)\n\n8. LIROCKET-1 recently had occasion to visit Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412), the Soviet Consul, in the first office from approximately 1830-1900 on a Thursday. At this time he found LOGINOV doing paper work and a stack of 30-35 passports on his desk. LIROCKET-1 also recently stepped into the first office to see LOGINOV at 1830 on a Tuesday, but LOGINOV was just leaving and LIROCKET-1 did not stay. LIROCKET-1 has never been inside the second office. His sketch of the second office is based on what he has been able to see from the Reception Room and the first office. In order not to be conspicuous, he purposely did not look around the first office when he was in it and consequently does not know what kind of furnishings, if any, are on the far side of the first office.\n\n9. From January 1966 to January 1967, LIROCKET-1 was in the Reception Room on 8-10 occasions when other non-Soviet visitors came in. The Soviet interviewer ushered the visitors into one of the offices and closed the door to the first office on about four of these occasions. On two occasions, the Soviet interviewer ushered the visitor into the first office and did not bother to close the door. On four or five occasions, the Soviet interviewer came out into the Reception Room to talk with the visitor in LIROCKET-1's presence. In each of the six or seven cases in which Subject was able to hear the conversation, the Soviet and the visitor were discussing visa matters.\n10. LIOCKIT-1 estimated that while he was present in the reception room between January 1966 and January 1967, he observed Soviets in the first office about four times as often as in the second office. From mug shots, he identified the following Soviets as having been the primary users of the two offices during the times he was present:\n\n(a) LOGINOV, one of the two Soviet Vice-Consuls until he became Consul in September 1966. LOGINOV is known KGB. LIOCKIT-1 frequently saw him in the first office and saw him receive several visitors.\n\n(b) Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123), Second Secretary and the Consul until September 1966. YATSKOV is known KGB. LIOCKIT-1 saw YATSKOV with about half the frequency of LOGINOV. YATSKOV used both offices. LIOCKIT-1 also saw YATSKOV receive visitors.\n\n(c) Vladislav Sergeyevich KORUSHKIN (201-744341), Vice-Consul and probably KGB. LIOCKIT-1 saw him walk in and out of the first office several times, but never saw him receive visitors.\n\n(d) Ruslan Aleksandrovich TUCHIN (201-205304), the radio and TV correspondent and suspect GRU. LIOCKIT-1 saw him in the second office two or three times, but never saw him receive a visitor.\n\n[Signature]\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\nSECRET 051602Z CITE MEXICO CITY 1036\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 90320\n\nAPOLOGIES FOR MISTAKE IN LILYRIC LOG. ACTUAL LILYRIC PHOTO SHOWS CAR HAD FLORIDA 66 TAGS 10-W-6776.\n\nSECRET\n\nLogan\n\n201-5-5-712\nSECRET\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 0699 (IN 22585)*\n\nFLORIDA 66 TAGS 10-W-7776 ISSUED TO NEGRO LABORER FOR 59 OLDSMOBILE. VIEW DISCREPANCY, CAN YOU PROVIDE YEAR OR COLOR OF TAGS MENTIONED REF.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n*Man in late model Buick Electra with Florida tags 10-W-7776 stopped at Soviet Embassy.\nSECRET 341925Z CITE MEXICO CITY 3972\nDIRECTOR\nREDCOAT\nREF: DIRECTOR ILWGO\n\n1. STATION OFFICER HAD LUNCH WITH SUBJECT REF 23 MARCH. AFTER INITIAL RELUCTANCE, SHE AGREED REPORT PERSONALITY DATA AND OTHER INFORMATION HE LOGINOV ACQUIRED DURING NORMAL BUSINESS AND SOCIAL CONTACT WITH HIM, STATED SHE HAD GONE OUT WITH HIM SEVERAL TIMES, USUALLY TO DINNER, MOVIES, COFFEE NIGHTCAP AND THEN \"ALWAYS STRAIGHT HOME.\" DESCRIBED LOGINOV AS VERY INTELLIGENT AND INTERESTING, UNLIKE USUAL BUREAUCRATIC SOVIET. SAID HE ONCE ASKED HER IF SHE HAD ANY FRIENDS IN LYPURG, BUT THAT SHE HAD AVOIDED QUESTION AND LOGINOV HAD NOT PURSUED MATTER. STATED THEIR CONVERSATION OTHERWISE STRICTLY SOCIAL.\n\n2. SUBJECT IMPRESSED AS INTELLIGENT, SOCIABLE, ATTRACTIVE AND ON SOPHISTICATED SIDE. ALTHOUGH INDEPENDENT-MINDED, APPEARED RATIONAL AND PRO-WOLJADY. SITUATION NOT OPPORTUNE TO GET BID REQUESTED REF. BUT SUBJECT AND LYPURG CITIZENSHIP SECTION REQUESTED FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFO:\n\n1. SUBJECT 1955, 635435, 5-55 7, 644556, 8, 9, 88.\nB. MOTHER IS SARA LOUISE KAIZ DE AVILA, U.S. CITIZEN\nBORN 26 NOVEMBER 1914 TOLEDO, OHIO. MOTHER HAS RESIDED\nMEXICO SINCE CA 1939. NO STATION TRACES.\n\n3. SUBJECT TO CONTACT C/O AFTER NEXT DATE WITH LOGINGU.\nWILL GET SUBJECT'S DPOB AND DATA ON MEXICAN FATHER AT THAT TIME.\nSECRET\n\nBT\n1. Subject was recruited in May 1963 to accept Soviet recruitment if approached during a visit to the USSR in May-June 1963. Following his return to Mexico, he reported that no effort had been made to recruit or, to his knowledge, cultivate or compromise him. The Station maintained sporadic contact with Subject between June 1963 and August 1964, during which time he furnished limited information on Soviet travelers to and from Mexico and on Soviet interest in increasing tourist traffic between Mexico and the USSR.\n\n2. The Station was notified in August 1964 that Subject's POA had been cancelled. There was then no further contact with him until January 1966, although during the latter part of 1965, Subject on his own initiative gave the LNPURE officer with whom he regularly dealt on visa matters information on Soviet visitors to Mexico, as well as on the visit of the Moscow Symphony to Mexico. The LNPURE officer passed this information on to the Station. In January 1966, Subject advised the LNPURE officer that he was in contact with Pavel Antonovich YATSKOV (201-120123) and Valentin Sergeyovich LOGINOV (201-285412), both of whom had asked him for information on sea and rail travel between Mexico, New York, and Europe. At this time, the LNPURE officer turned Subject over to a new Station case officer who debriefed Subject and obtained his agreement to supply personality information on LOGINOV. Subject stipulated at this time, however, that he did not want to become involved in clandestine meetings or take money, and expressed the desire to meet the case officer in the LNPURE officer's office following the conclusion of Subject's visa business.\n\n(Continued)\nThe LNPUR officer also informed the case officer that Subject had previously mentioned that he had once been \"approached\" to supply information on Soviet travelers on a regular basis and had refused to do so. Subject evidently did not specifically say that he had been approached by WOLADY, but this was clearly the implication. Subject told the LNPUR officer that he was willing to supply information he considered unusual or especially interesting, but was not willing to supply information on a routine basis.\n\n3. The Station had no contact with Subject between 6 January and 28 September 1966. On 20 September, the Station learned from LICOST-5 that Subject had been invited along with several other Mexican travel agents to attend an Intourist conference in Moscow from 24-29 October. A meeting was consequently arranged with Subject for 28 September through the LNPUR officer.\n\n4. Subject told the Station officer who met him that he had been meaning to contact the Station about his forthcoming trip, which, he said, he assumed was what the case officer wanted to talk about. He gave the case officer a copy of his invitation to the Intourist conference and on his own initiative offered to provide the Station with a full report of the conference when he returned. However, he stated that he was not interested in working for the Station on a permanent, \"agent\" basis, in meeting under clandestine circumstances, or taking money. He was willing to help to the extent he was explained, because he believed basically what we did about current world problems and, after all, had lived in WOLADY for many years and regarded it as his \"second home\". On the basis of this interview and a review of Subject's file, Subject impressed the case officer as a somewhat disingenuous egotist who, despite a genuine sympathy for WOLADY, regarded his cooperation with the Station primarily as a means of insuring his business contacts with LNPUR and as something which had to be kept to a minimum lest it limit his independence or detract him in any way from his business and personal interests. This impression served as the basis for the evaluation of Subject contained in Reference A.\n\n5. The case officer's impression of Subject changed considerably with the next meeting, which was held on 18 October. At this meeting, the case officer gave Subject a defensive briefing for his trip and went over general reporting requirements. Subject surprised the case officer with his friendliness and cooperativeness, and went to great pains to explain that he was more than willing to cooperate with the Station as long as he did not become so deeply involved in intelligence work that his business or personal life was adversely affected. The case officer was impressed by Subject's apparent sincerity and got the definite impression that ever since receiving the Intourist invitation, Subject had been fearful he was again going to be asked to accept a double agent role which, if it materialized, would require him to become far more deeply involved in intelligence work than he wished. Sensing both Subject's relief at not being asked to undertake a more demanding assignment and his concern to make it clear that his heart was nevertheless in the right place, the case officer used the opportunity to again pose the question of whether Subject would be willing to report on a routine basis on persons who booked travel through his agency to the USSR. The case officer told Subject that this information could be forwarded to the Station through the LNPUR officer and assured him that his cooperation in supplying such information would not involve him in a series of escalating intelligence assignments. Evidently satisfied that his role would remain a limited one, Subject agreed to report the desired information on a regular basis. Moreover, he volunteered to check with other travel agencies in order to fulfill specific requirements for information on travelers to the Soviet Union who did not book their travel through his agency.\n6. Subject was thoroughly debriefed upon his return from the USSR in early November 1966, at which time he continued to exhibit the same friendliness and cooperativeness noted in paragraph five. He reported that he was aware of no effort to assess, cultivate, or compromise him in the USSR. He provided information both on the formal proceedings of the conference and on individual Soviet and foreign participants, as well as on a Spanish businessman he met in Moscow. This information resulted in three Field Information Reports (HUMA-10,870, 30 November 1966; HUMA-10,871, 30 November 1966; HUMA-10,872, 30 November 1966), one dispatch to Madrid (HUMA-30725, 1 December 1966), and a second to Santiago (HUMA-30749, 2 December 1966). Since furnishing information on his trip to the USSR, Subject has provided information on the travel of the Bolshoi Ballet in Mexico, on a Mexican traveler to the USSR, and on a Soviet student group which was slated to visit Mexico, but which for unknown reasons failed to arrive at the last minute.\n\n7. The only Soviet Subject has recently been in contact with is LOGINOV, whom he occasionally sees on visa matters. According to Subject, their relationship during the past year has been strictly of a business nature and LOGINOV has shown no interest in extending it beyond this. Subject consequently appears to have little to offer in the way of an access agent to the Soviets in the foreseeable future. However, as the manager of one of five Mexican travel agencies Intourist and because of his apparently excellent contacts with key personnel of the other four travel agencies, he promises to be a useful referent on persons who book travel in Mexico to the Soviet Union and other Communist countries.\n\n8. Despite the regularization of our relationship with Subject and his increased cooperativeness, we do not feel we are currently in a position to ask him to undergo an SGSWRL interview. The relationship between the case officer and Subject at this time is essentially one of equals in which Subject is voluntarily assisting INFORC out of ideological motivation. It is true that his strong business interest in maintaining friendly relations with INFORC and INPURE provides us with a degree of control, but we feel that at present it is better left as a form of tacit control than brandished even subtly. It is our opinion that Subject would regard an SGSWRL interview as an effort both to increase our control over him and to draw him deeper into the intelligence business. Such a reaction would in all probability undo much of our recent progress with Subject. Consequently, we would prefer to postpone an SGSWRL interview until either we further solidify our relationship with Subject or we wish to use him in more sensitive work.\n\nfor\nWillard C. CURTIS\nSECRET 1523302 CITS MEXICO CITY 0699\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\n1. PER LILYRIC ON 9 MARCH A MAN DRIVING WHAT APPEARS TO BE LATE MODEL BUICK ELECTRA WITH FLORIDA TAGS 13-W-7776 STOPPED AT SOVIET EMBASSY AND TALKED WITH CONSUL VALENTIN S. LOGINOV. MAN DID NOT ENTER EMBASSY.\n\nSECRET\n\nLOGINO\n\n201 285412\nSECRET\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 0653 (IN 20404)\n\nREDIRECT\n\nNO EGS TRACKS MISS MIRIAM AVILA KATZ. UNLESS ADVISED TO CONTRARY,\n\nWILL INITIATE FOA.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n81/0/WH Cormier (phone)\n\nWilliam V. Broe\nC/AGID\n\nAUTHENTICATING OFFICER\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 131816Z CITE MEXICO CITY 0653\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDCOAT\n\n1. REQUEST HQS TRACES ON MISS MIRIAM AVILA KATZ, MEXICAN CITIZEN BORN CA 1941. ATTENDED COLLEGE IN OHIO FOR TWO YEARS, PROBABLY ABOUT 1959-1960. CURRENTLY EMPLOYED MUNDOS/TOURS TRAVEL AGENCY, MEXICO CITY.\n\n2. PER LIENVOY AND LICOZY-5, SUBJECT IS IN SOCIAL CONTACT WITH VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV, 201-285412. ACCORDING LICOZY-5, SUBJECT IS INTELLIGENT AND DEFINITELY NOT PRO-SOVIET.\n\nSECRET\n\nBT\n\nSECRET\n\n201-285412\n| SUBJECT OF DOCUMENT | DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|\n|                     |                         |\n\n| RE FILE NO. | DISPATCH OR SOURCE DOC. SIGNAL NO. | DATE |\n|-------------|-----------------------------------|------|\n|             |                                   |      |\n\n| SOURCE CRYPTO | DATE OF INFO | EVALUATION |\n|---------------|--------------|------------|\n|               |              |            |\n\n| ANALYST | DATE PROCESSED | DISSEMINATED IN | DATE |\n|---------|----------------|-----------------|------|\n|         |                |                 |      |\n\n| DOCUMENT DISPOSITION | TRANSFERRED TO | BY FILE NO. |\n|-----------------------|----------------|-------------|\n|                       |                |             |\n\n| CROSS REFERRED TO THIS FILE | TRANSFERRED TO | BY FILE NO. |\n|-----------------------------|----------------|-------------|\n|                             |                |             |\n\n**Pertinent Information:**\n\nLUGINOV, VALERIY SERGEYEVICH\n201-274412\nSLX M INB. P.\n\nCIT P.\n\nIN CONTACT WITH DORIS SERGEYEVICH IVANOV\n201-274412\n\nFILE IN 201-255412\n\nFILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.\n\nSECRET\n\n301-255412\nSECRET\n\nPANAMA CITY INFO DIRECTOR\n\nRED COAT LCIMPROVE\n\nREF: A. HMA 31376\nB. MEXICO CITY 8463\nC. PANAMA CITY 0983\nD. EZP 8730\n\n1. PER LIENVOY VALENTIN S. LOGINOV 201-285412 TOLD PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATION HE WANTS TO GO TO REF A CONVENTION AND BRING FRIEND ALEKSANDR N. NIKITIN, SOVEXPORT FILM REP \"WHO WENT TO FILM FESTIVAL IN PANAMA LAST YEAR.\" LOGINOV ASKED PRESIDENT TO ARRANGE VISAS FOR BOTH \"IN ORDER TO AVOID DIFFICULTIES.\" PRESIDENT CONTACTED LOGINOV LATER AND SAID HE HAD CHECKED WITH PANAMANIAN CONSUL IN MEXICO, EMILTA AROSEME\u00d1A, WHO TOLD HIM THERE NO PROBLEM IN VISA FOR LOGINOV AS CONSUL ATTENDING CONVENTION BUT THAT NIKITIN MUST MAKE FORMAL VISA APPLICATION WHICH SHE MUST SUBMIT TO HER GOVERNMENT.\n\n2. PLEASE ATTEMPT BLOCK NIKITIN'S VISA. YOU MAY TELL LIAISON HE IS KGB OFFICER WHO AS SOVEXPORTFILM REP\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 0469 SECRET\n\nHAS NO CONSULAR OR DIPLOMATIC STATUS, AND THUS DOES NOT HAVE LEGITIMATE REASON TO ATTEND CONVENTION. S BLOCKING LOGINOV'S VISA MAY BE AWKWARD SUGGEST YOU INFORM LIAISON HE IS NOTORIOUS KGB OFFICER. PER PACY 7280, 19 DEC 61 LOGINOV TRANSITED PANAMA 16 AND 17 DEC 61 ESCORTING SOVIET FOOTBALL TEAM. HYPOTHESIS COVERT BAGGAGE SEARCH REVEALED ENVELOPE CONTAINING LARGE SUM AMERICAN BILLS. IF THIS INFO USABLE LOCALLY SUGGEST YOU SAY MONEY UNDOUBTEDLY WAS FOR TRANSMITTAL TO A LA COMMUNIST PARTY.\n\nSECRET\n\nBY\n\nSECRET\n| SUBJECT OF DOCUMENT | DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|\n| LOGINOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH | 201-285412 |\n| SEX M DUB 7 | 050-005-000 |\n| CIT USSR | MMMA-31376 |\n| OCC 2 | 14 FEB 67 |\n| MEXICO REF FACT THAT CUBAN AND SOVIET MARS OF MEXICO CONSULAR ASSOCIATION MAY SEIZE OPPORTUNITY GIVEN THEM BY INVITATION TO ATTEND FOURTH INTERAMERICAN CONSULAR ASSO TO SEEK PANAMANIAN VISAS. | |\n\nFILE IN 201-285412\nIn accordance with Reference A, Russell K. MUGARE (alias Ted KELLY) joined Mr. L. A. SALOM for a meeting with BESABER on 28 January (see Reference A) and met the latter alone for 45 minutes on 2 February.\n\n2. After determining that BESABER has had social contact with Subject of 201-203412 (Name A), Subject of 201-116900 (Name B), and AF-116900, we discussed with respect to Soviet officials in Mexico City, related to these three officials. In the course of the conversations, we told BESABER that Name A is a known KGB officer and that he is a known KGB officer, but that we have no hard evidence to identify REJUVEN as an intelligence officer. He was told that our principal objective in his contact with Soviet officials is to obtain personality data and operational information for use against such Soviets to effect their destruction in the future. Since BESABER has been working with us extensively on the Polish target for over two years, none of the above was new to him.\n\n3. Subject had the following to say about each of the Soviets mentioned above:\n\na. Name A\u2014This Soviet is just learning to handle himself well in the social situation demanded by his position in the Embassy. BESABER believes he can be brought into a situation where he could be induced to talk and his hair down. Given situation sufficiently persuasive, he could be an easy target for a reasonably pretty and well-dressed female.\n\nDuring the one social occasion through Polish Embassy, at which BESABER had an opportunity to observe, this Soviet showed concern to REJUVEN, which was because of the latter's social status and high position standing or because of his actual intelligence affinity between the two could not be determined.\n\n(Correlated)\nCONCLUSION OF\n\n1. The case has been a difficult one.\n\n2. On occasion, in the last few months, there have been a number of problems.\n\n3. After some thought, the conclusion is that he be moved to another area.\n\n4. He has been making this statement on nothing more than \"feel.\" Later in the conversation, SCHEER said that he would be able to test his belief.\n\n5. Eventually, use of his New York address (idea of headquarters to be forwarded) is known to SCHEER as a homosexual. SCHEER believes that this can be used to provide the opportunity. It was suggested that SCHEER's penchant for tennis (of which SCHEER was earlier advised) might provide the entree since SCHEER's wife is an avid tennis player. From the above, SCHEER's assessment of SCHEER's emphasis on everything we already know concerning the defendant's talents, abilities, social charm, etc.\n\n6. SCHEER has given the following requirements with respect to the above: (1) the idea of a change in the MILITARY (after 1945) to a city after his return.\n\n7. SCHEER's social relationships and activities involved in their non-official social activities, including involvement with them. To look for an opportunity to see every day of the week, to be able to determine whether the defendant's reference is not to be used for any other purpose.\n\n8. The defendant's social relationships and activities involved in their non-official social activities, including involvement with them. To look for an opportunity to see every day of the week, to be able to determine whether the defendant's reference is not to be used for any other purpose.\n\n9. The defendant's social relationships and activities involved in their non-official social activities, including involvement with them. To look for an opportunity to see every day of the week, to be able to determine whether the defendant's reference is not to be used for any other purpose.\n\n10. The defendant's social relationships and activities involved in their non-official social activities, including involvement with them. To look for an opportunity to see every day of the week, to be able to determine whether the defendant's reference is not to be used for any other purpose.\nCONTINUATION OF\nDISPATCH\n\nThis letter is to inform you of the potential financial benefits of expanding our business operations into several countries. The idea is to diversify our risk by investing in new markets. With our help, he could expand his business into several countries and, thus, provide us with extensive cover possibilities (even in Europe) and the opportunity to take the risk without assurance that his losses, should they occur, will be completely covered through his association with us.\n\nRussell K. Kucharek\n\nDistribution: CTS, Mexico City W/atts/USA\n\nAttachment: Identity Sheet\nIDENTITY SHEET\n\nIDENTITY A Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV\nIDENTITY B Col. Vladimir Nikolayevich SOKOLOV\nIDENTITY C Mr. Tom Taran\nSECRET 270756Z CITE MEXICO CITY 0117\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nTELEPHONE REDUX\n\nREF: A. MEXICO CITY 9937 (\\gamma \\delta \\zeta \\theta \\iota \\kappa \\lambda \\mu \\nu \\xi \\omega \\rho \\sigma \\tau \\upsilon \\phi \\chi \\psi \\omega)\n\nB. DIRECTOR 69152\n\n1. FOLLOWING ARE CHANGES TO PLAN MEET REGARER WASH:\n   A. REGARER BOOKED AT SHERATON PARK HOTEL, 2663\n      WOODLEY ROAD N.W., NOT SHERATON AS STATED REF A.\n   B. DUE ETA (WIA AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 57)\n      REGARER WILL STAND BY IN HOTEL FOR CALL REF B REF 3 BETWEEN\n      2000 AND 2130, 28 JAN.\n\n2. DURING RECENT TRIP MEXICO MACHANE TOLD STATION\n   HE WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO REGARER RE SOVIET MATTERS,\n   (LOGICALLY IN PARTICULAR.\n\nSECRET\n\nST\n\n201-285412\nREFERENCE: H.I.A.-30722; 1 December 1966\n\n1. Transmitted herewith is a Progress Report on LIOXY-5 for the period 1 November 1966-13 January 1967.\n\n2. We are having LIOXY-5 check further into the details of and his own prospects for making the Air France inaugural flight to Shanghai referred to in paragraph 3 B. According to the local Air France manager, he suggested that LIOXY-5 participate in the flight, the flight is scheduled for late April or early May 1967. According to the Air France manager, although the Air France route to Shanghai has been operative since the fall of 1966, it is customary to have an official inaugural flight in which specially invited travel agents take part.\n\n3. In view of LIOXY-5's long-time double agent role and his poor reporting in the past, we doubt there is much to be gained from having him take the proposed trip. Consequently, unless YZ Division has particular interest in LIOXY-5 making the trip, we plan to tell him that we have no interest in him doing so. Please advise us by 20 February of any YZ interest.\n\nFor/Edward C. Curtis\n\nAttachment:\nProgress Report\n\nDistribution:\n2 - CWR, w/att., H/Y\n1 - CES, w/att., L/Y\n1 - C/NOUSSE, w/att.\nJanuary 1977\n\nSUBJECT: Progress Report/ Update (1 November 1966 - 15 January 1967)\n\nRECEIVED: USA-20721, 1 December 1966\n\n1. The last Progress Report (see reference) reported developments in the operation through 31 October 1966, but not included were Subject's activities at the INTELSAT Conference in Moscow to which Subject traveled on 22 October 1966. These activities will be reported below.\n\n2. Contacts\n\nA. Subject and KGB Case Officer\n\nSubject's frequent visits in Moscow during October 1966 from a former KGB case officer in Mexico, Oleg Nekhiporov, Subject since his return to Mexico from his European and Israel trip in mid-November has seen KGB officers on four occasions for a total time of less than an hour.\n\nIn Moscow, where Subject was attending the INTELSAT Conference, Subject was visited briefly every day in his room at the Hotel National by Nekhiporov, from 24 October through 26 October.\n\nFirst contact by the Soviets on Subject's return to Mexico was effected by KGB case officer Alexander Vladimirovich Prishchepov (201-202279) on 3 December in Subject's office for a few minutes. On 4 December, KGB case officer, Oleg Nekhiporov, Subject's regular KGB case officer, called Subject down to the street outside Subject's office to present him with KGB Ballet tickets. On 19 December, Nekhiporov visited Subject's office and spent no more than half an hour there. On 20 or 21 December, Subject was paid a brief visit by KGB case officer and possible candidate for contact (201-120129) at Subject's office.\n\nB. Subject and KGB City Station Chief Officer\n\nIn the two months since Subject's return from Europe in mid-November 1966, the C/O, Ivanov A. Kornilov, has seen Subject six times for an approximate total of nine hours.\n\nThe C/O met Subject at his office on 22 November for two hours.\n\nIn December, the C/O met Subject three times, on 6 December at his office for almost two hours, on 12 December at the Hotel Reforma for a half-hour, and on 22 December at Subject's office for an hour.\n\nOn 7 January 1967, the C/O and his wife took Subject and his wife out for dinner at the Belvedere Room of the Hotel Continental Mexico, to reciprocate for a former invitation to Subject's home. On 12 January, the C/O met Subject at the latter's office for one hour.\n\n3. Operational Update\n\nA. Subject/ KGB\n\nSubject arrived in Mexico on 22 October 1966 to attend the INTELSAT Conference\nIn which travel again on a world-wide basis had been limited. On Subject's second day in London, the Natchiporosko, Subject's former Soviet C/O in Mexico, came to visit him at the Hotel National. Subject deliberately kept his own way his idea so that Natchiporosko would find it difficult to have private words with him. However, Natchiporosko came to visit Subject every day thereafter until Subject's departure, bringing gifts of records, novels, etc. when Natchiporosko found the opportunity the first thing he said Subject was that he heard Subject had been a \"robot\" and had been difficult in Mexico. Subject, in his half-serious manner, postulated the idea that he was a robot and told Natchiporosko earnestly that he didn't have the time, effort or inclination to indulge in the cooperation that was expected of him. He gave Natchiporosko the old line about friends \"hasta la vista\" but that he couldn't and wouldn't put out the old effort. Natchiporosko said that was too bad because he had wanted to present Subject to his chiefs and now there was no point in it. Subject shrugged this off. Natchiporosko asked Subject if he would be willing to use his office as a letter-drop. Subject said, reprovingly, that that was not a very smart idea\u2014since agents writing to his firm and to him would then know of Subject's connection with the Soviets and he would thus be exposed. Nevertheless, Natchiporosko told Subject to think it over and talk to Valentin (Lastov) in Mexico about it. Also, Natchiporosko told Subject that they hadn't forgotten about the \"branch office\" and that Subject shouldn't feel bad about the delay in getting it up. Subject ridiculed that idea, saying that it was the Soviets who should feel bad; for him, he couldn't be bothered in the future with the trip and time involved. Natchiporosko, still not chastened, asked if Subject would provide information on all changes in IIA regulations for travel in Central and South America. Subject said he had given this information to the Soviets in the past. Natchiporosko then asked Subject to continue to give such information to Valentin.\n\nSubject elicited from Natchiporosko that he was working in the Latin American Section of the Foreign Ministry, etc. that he was allowed to come and go as he pleased to visit Subject. In the context of telling Subject that he was not Subject was not getting along with his Soviet friends, Natchiporosko said that he would be coming back to Mexico next year.\n\nOne day while Natchiporosko was in his hotel room, the phone rang and Subject picked up the phone. A woman voice asked for \"Olga.\" Subject bellowingly replied in Russian that \"Olga\" wasn't around, but couldn't he do. In the ensuing conversation Subject found out that the caller was a 25-year-old student, her address and telephone number, and made a date to meet her the following day at the Latin Section of the Petro. Natchiporosko was all in favor of Subject making the date, and in a matter of fact asked the next day to take Subject's son to the circus so that Subject would be free. (Comment: Subject said that he never did go to meet the young girl, but told Natchiporosko that he had gone and the girl had not shown up. Subject was of the opinion that this was not a promotion by the Soviets, but he asked away because he did not want to be involved in anything interesting.)\n\nThen Alexander Irinovsko dropped in unexpectedly at Subject's office on 9 December, while Subject's wife and son were present, the Soviets asked him if he could have lunch with Subject, and the latter put him off telling Irinovsko to call next week. (Comment: Irinovsko did not call.)\n\nOn 8 December, Valentin Lastov, who had called Subject's office by phone to invite Subject to come down to the office, told Subject for just a minute to present him with two tickets to the Soviet Ballet for 9 December. (Comment: Subject attended.)\nOn 29 December, Loginozov was introduced to Subject's office and presented on\nhis own initiative with him nothing. The Subject presented Subject with four bottles\nof vodka for Christmas, and began to ask Subject a series of personal questions:\n1) How had Subject left Poland for Paris after WWII - had his documentation been\nlegal or illegal? Subject assured that it was legal.\n2) How was he able to enter Paris - did he have a valid French visa? Subject said\nhe did. How long did he stay in Paris? Subject said a few months.\n3) Was he released from service with the Polish OSS? Subject said yes. Were there\nany conditions to this release? Subject said no. Was he supposed to be arrested\nby the police? Subject said yes, and related the story of how he was contacted in\nParis (in March 1945) by a Polish diplomat who brought a letter from\nSubject's old boss in the OSS, and now Subject assured that latter. Had Subject's\nresponse to the Polish boss positive or negative? Subject said neutral. A key\nquestion, Subject replied that he believed that eighty percent of the Polish were anti-Soviet.\nLoginozov said \"you are right.\"\n\nLoginozov asked Subject to go walking along with the American airlines he had\nwith. Subject said fine, and added why. Loginozov said that maybe, if Subject was\nin the chance, he can turn the name of \"the director of...\" in Paris. Subject\ntold Loginozov he was wrong to think Subject could get that information. When Loginozov\npersisted in knowing whether Subject would tell the director if he did get that\ninformation, Subject dismissed the topic with a coy \"maybe.\"\n\nSubject promised to show Loginozov the documents that backed up his answers to\nLoginozov's questions.\n\nOn either 30 or 31 December, Paul Yatskov dropped by Subject's office to give\nhim some gifts he had brought back from Moscow. Yatskov said Subject had done\nYatskov a favor during the holiday season in Moscow by arranging for Subject's travel\nin Paris to assist Yatskov. Yatskov expressed great gratitude to Subject and presented\nhim with a bottle of Cognac and a box of vodka, a decorative box and 100 roses\nof carnations. Yatskov (no longer with the post of Soviet Consul in Mexico, and is\na possible candidate for KGB residency) told Subject that he is also grateful for\nthis Subject has done for \"him,\" and to be sure that Subject will not leave \"him\"\nalone in the realization of their common ideals. Yatskov further stated that\nhe and Subject have very much in common, and that they should meet. It was\nleft that Yatskov would call Subject.\n\nB. Subject/Paris City Station\n\nThe C/O has Subject at his office on 30 December, 1965 to discuss him on the\nresults of his trip to Moscow (see paragraph 3 A. above). In addition to providing\ninformation on his contacts with KGB officials, Subject gave incidental information\nconcerning a female Soviet Jew he met, and the anti-American attitude of a travel\nagent from Chile.\n\nIn a separate in Subject's office, Subject reported to the C/O about his brief\ncontacts he had had with KGB officials and Loginozov on 29 and 30 December. The C/O, in\nresponse to a Station request, requested with Subject the topic of the Jewish\ncommunity support that Secretary of the Communist Party is alleged to have sought\nin his candidacy for next president of Poland. Subject related again the story of\nhow Jacob Zalkind had come to mention the matter to Subject, including the fact\nthat Subject was being pressured to use one of the five in identical members of the\nJewish community for Soviet Jewish support (Zalkind did not mention the others).\nThe C/O reminded that Subject should further with Zalkind only if he had the\nopportunity.\nOn 13 December, Subject reported to the C/O about Logan's personal questions regarding the subject's work (see paragraph 3.4 above). The C/O asked Subject if he had received a letter from Logan. Subject said he had not, and thought it was completely useless to ask the subject about the subject's work. Subject said he felt perfectly at ease in telling the truth to the subject, and had no hesitation in showing them his documentation.\n\nThe C/O dropped by Subject's office on 22 December, after having mailed a Christmas gift of flowers to Subject's home the previous day. Subject reported to the C/O that he had met Victor's replacement, Victor H. Franco.\n\nSubject mentioned that he had received a holiday season letter from Sidney, who was now a U.S. State Department official in Chile. Subject had also received a letter from the subject in Chile through Subject. Nothing ever came of it.\n\nSubject reported that he had received a firm invitation from the manager of the hotel in Mexico to go on the August flight of Air France to New York (Shanghai), possibly in April 1957, to which Subject had replied that he \"would love to go.\" The C/O asked Subject if he had any interest in attending the trip. The C/O replied that Subject would be interested.\n\nThe C/O then discussed seriously with Subject the importance of how complete his report was from the subject's work. Subject was asked about his conduct (the C/O told Subject that the subject's conduct was \"higher up,\" which incidentally the C/O did not share). The C/O asked Subject to explain his relationship to Logan's request to report the name of the \"Chief\" in Mexico, and his willingness to turn over the subject's documentation over to the subject. Subject's reply was that he had told the subject that his report was more than adequate because he had only written a letter to the subject, and everything else (the subject's objective) was left to the subject's discretion. He explained his willingness, even more his desire, to see the subject's documentation to the subject, because he wanted to know those details. Subject asked the subject to look at the subject's documentation to the subject, and gave him the go-ahead to pursue the matter.\n\nOn 12 January 1957, the C/O was received the subject's expression of interest in seeing Subject's file. The subject from Air France asked Subject for more details concerning the invitation from Air France, and gave him the go-ahead to pursue the matter.\n\nThe current C/O, Francisco J. Colinas, will turn Subject over to Francisco J. Colinas before leaving the subject's office on 12 January 1957.\nREFERENCE: MEXICO CITY-9930,\n\n1. BESABER first met LOGINOV casually on 14 December 1965 at a Polish Embassy reception for a visiting Parliamentary delegation. No plans were made for recontact, although cards were exchanged and BESABER reported that LOGINOV was quite friendly.\n\n2. It was not until 4 October 1966, almost a year later, that BESABER again ran into LOGINOV at another Polish Embassy reception, this one in honor of the departing Polish Ambassador. On that occasion LOGINOV expressed an interest in buying some of the mosaics that BESABER produces. When LOGINOV found out that Mrs. BESABER was an avid tennis player, he let it be known that he was too, and would enjoy getting together for a game. (Parenthetically, he mentioned that he played regularly at the French Club, but that he did not enjoy the atmosphere there because there were too many Germans.) Finally, when BESABER mentioned that he very much liked Russian vodka, LOGINOV said he would sell him some at Embassy discount prices.\n\n3. On 13 October 1966 LOGINOV tried unsuccessfully to contact BESABER by phone to purchase some mosaics for the Russian athletes who were in town in connection with the \"Little Olympics.\" BESABER unfortunately never got the message that LOGINOV left (although we picked it up on LIENVOY).\n\n4. The Station decided at this point to have BESABER wait for LOGINOV to make the next move, but when by 15 December\n\n- CONTINUED -\n\nDistribution:\n2 - CBB\n1 - CWH\n\nCS COPY FILED IN 201-744856\n\nFile in 201-285412\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\n201-285412\n\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\nHMMA - 31099\n\nDATE\n17 JANUARY 1967\n\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\n\nFILE NUMBER\n201-744856\nthere had not been any signs of action, BESABER was instructed to try to get in touch with LOGINOV regarding the purchase of vodka (for Christmas). When Christmas passed without any luck in contacting LOGINOV (BESABER was extremely busy during this period) we decided to change tactics a bit.\n\n5. Per Station instructions BESABER phoned LOGINOV on 12 January 1967 and made arrangements to drop by the Embassy the following morning to show LOGINOV the catalogs of his mosaic ware. BESABER was instructed to take advantage of this meet to try to establish some kind of reason for continuing the relationship (tennis and vodka buying were suggested). As it turned out LOGINOV gave BESABER the necessary opening. After a cursory, but polite look at BESABER's catalogs he LOGINOV dismissed this subject by saying that he was not in the immediate market for any of BESABER's merchandise, but might be in the future. He then changed the subject, mentioned that he was in charge of looking for a house in Cuernavaca to be used by Embassy personnel (LIENNOY confirms that LOGINOV has the responsibility for renting a house in Cuernavaca as a summer retreat for wives and children.) LOGINOV told BESABER that he was prepared to pay 5,000 NN ($400.00 U.S.) per month for June, July and August 1967. He wants a four-bedroom (or more) house with a heated swimming pool and garden. LOGINOV mentioned that in 1966 the Embassy had rented a house on Calle Humboldt, that they had liked it, but that he was not sure they could get a lease again this year. He several times asked BESABER, who lives in Cuernavaca, to help him in locating a suitable house. BESABER of course said he would be delighted to assist LOGINOV and promised to phone him as soon as he found something. On this note the meeting ended.\n\n6. BESABER will be out of town for two weeks (on vacation in Acapulco and in the U.S., as set forth in reference.) In the meantime, he will get one of his employees to look for housing for LOGINOV in Cuernavaca. Shortly after his return to Mexico (about 6 February) he will contact LOGINOV with a suggestion that he come down to look at whatever housing leads have been developed and/or to play tennis and enjoy a day in Cuernavaca.\n\n7. The purpose of this exercise is to establish a familiar social relationship between BESABER and LOGINOV, one that will permit the Station to further assess LOGINOV. To date BESABER's first impressions were not particularly enlightening other than his feeling that LOGINOV is susceptible to further social development. The Station will encourage this activity with BESABER and it will be helpful if Headquarters personnel, if they see BESABER during reference trip, also encourage him.\n\n8. One further matter for the record; BESABER was first introduced to LOGINOV by BEKEEP. They again were together at the Polish Embassy on 4 October 1966. Although BESABER has not told BEKEEP of his meet with LOGINOV on 13 January it is only because BESABER has not seen BEKEEP since before Christmas. BESABER has been instructed to be perfectly open with BEKEEP about having met LOGINOV and in fact it may turn out that LOGINOV and BEKEEP will visit BESABER together. (LOGINOV referred to the possibility in his 13 January meet with BESABER).\n9. The Station sees no reason why BESABER cannot handle the development of BEKKEP and LOGINOV at the same time. Where possible we will try to have BESABER arrange to cultivate them separately, but since the two targets are personal friends and see each other quite frequently, we plan to have BESABER be quite candid in mentioning his relationship with one to the other.\n\n10. Finally, we are well aware that since BESABER may well be compromised to the Poles, his relationship with LOGINOV will have to be considered in this light. On the other hand there seems little to be lost, and possibly a great deal to be gained by having BESABER continue to try to develop a close relationship with this Soviet target.\n\nfor/Willard C. CURTIS\nSECRET 1406452 CITE MEXICO CITY 9930\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDTOP BEDOX DUYOUR BESABER\n\n1. BESABER FLYING WASHINGTON AT OWN EXPENSE TO ATTEND\nCONVENTION OF SOCIETY OF PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, PLASTICS DIVISION.\nWILL ARRIVE 28 JAN, STAY SHOREHAM HOTEL. CONVENTION STARTS\n31 JAN, ENDS 3 FEB, AT WHICH TIME BESABER PLANS GO NEW YORK\nFOR FEW DAYS, THEN RETURN MEXICO.\n\n2. STATION BELIEVES IT WOULD BE USEFUL FOR HIS PERSONNEL\nINTERESTED IN CASES OUTLINED PARA 3, BELOW, TO MEET BESABER\nFOR DISCUSSIONS. IT WOULD ALSO BE GREATLY APPRECIATED IF\nHE WERE TAKEN OUT FOR AT LEAST ONE MEAL AND GIVEN PAT ON BACK\nFOR HIS EFFORTS WOFACT'S BEHALF.\n\n3. CASES IN WHICH BESABER ACTIVELY ENGAGED AT PRESENT\nARE:\n\nA. REEVEP.\n\nB. SUBJ MEXICO CITY 9928\n\nC. SUBJ 201-285412. STATION WILL PROVIDE DETAILS THIS\nRECENT LEAD BEFORE BESABER'S ARRIVAL WASH.\n\n4. BESABER HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY INSTRUCTED STANDBY HIS\n\n6061 NOV 501 285412\nSECRET\n\nPRIORITY SAN JOSE INFO: ROUTINE MEXICO CITY, SANTIAGO, BOGOTA\n\nREDTOP\n\nREFS: A. MEXICO CITY 9862 (IN74189) NOT SENT BOGOTA\n     B. SAN JOSE 9061 (IN 75041) NOT SENT BOGOTA\n     C. SAN JOSE 9063 (IN75195) NOT SENT BOGOTA\n     D. DIRECTOR 64371 (BEING RELAYED SAN JOSE)\n\n1. SEE PARA C REF D FOR TRACES KACHATUROV. ALL INFO AND TRACES ON SUBJ.\n\n2. LIAISON MAY ALSO BE TOLD VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH LOGINOV (201-285412) OF REFS A AND B IS KNOWN KGB.\n\n3. STATION MAY WISH USE ABOVE TO BLOCK ISSUANCE OF VISA AND, OR IF TOO LATE, ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT SUBJ AND NOVOSTI (IN VIEW REF C) THRU CONTROLLED STATION PRESS ASSET. FOR THIS PURPOSE POUCHING MATERIAL ON NOVOSTI UNDER TM 964310. ALSO HQS PLANS DISCUSS WITH HUEDE-2 DURING HIS VISIT.\n\n4. REQUEST STATION POUCH ANY POSSIBLE COVERAGE SUBJ ACTIVITIES AND CONTACTS SAN JOSE AS HQS INTERESTED EXPLOITING SOV INTELL USE OF PRESS COVER.\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICERS\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n\nUS COPY\n\n201-285412\n5. FOR BOGOTA: KACHATUROV HAS APPLIED COSTA RICAN VISA FOR PRESS EXCHANGE NEGOTIATIONS.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10173-10135.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 341, "total-input-tokens": 394869, "total-output-tokens": 142502, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 507, 1], [507, 556, 2], [556, 2048, 3], [2048, 3664, 4], [3664, 5641, 5], [5641, 7464, 6], [7464, 9398, 7], [9398, 11374, 8], [11374, 14100, 9], [14100, 14196, 10], [14196, 17258, 11], [17258, 19005, 12], [19005, 20770, 13], [20770, 21862, 14], [21862, 23029, 15], [23029, 25601, 16], [25601, 25825, 17], [25825, 28197, 18], [28197, 29246, 19], [29246, 30641, 20], [30641, 32246, 21], [32246, 33689, 22], [33689, 35301, 23], [35301, 36868, 24], [36868, 37958, 25], [37958, 38496, 26], [38496, 39355, 27], [39355, 41203, 28], [41203, 42664, 29], [42664, 44927, 30], [44927, 46870, 31], [46870, 47925, 32], [47925, 48053, 33], [48053, 48053, 34], [48053, 48053, 35], [48053, 48053, 36], [48053, 48869, 37], [48869, 49686, 38], [49686, 51312, 39], [51312, 52978, 40], [52978, 54335, 41], [54335, 55834, 42], [55834, 56954, 43], [56954, 57730, 44], [57730, 59246, 45], [59246, 60962, 46], [60962, 62605, 47], [62605, 64303, 48], [64303, 65890, 49], [65890, 67618, 50], [67618, 69307, 51], [69307, 70586, 52], [70586, 71488, 53], [71488, 71602, 54], [71602, 73068, 55], [73068, 73718, 56], [73718, 75458, 57], [75458, 77579, 58], [77579, 79304, 59], [79304, 80931, 60], [80931, 82566, 61], [82566, 84399, 62], [84399, 86594, 63], [86594, 88959, 64], [88959, 90368, 65], [90368, 90664, 66], [90664, 90664, 67], [90664, 90664, 68], [90664, 90664, 69], [90664, 91622, 70], [91622, 93263, 71], [93263, 94979, 72], [94979, 96631, 73], [96631, 98325, 74], [98325, 99439, 75], [99439, 101206, 76], [101206, 103546, 77], [103546, 105079, 78], [105079, 105499, 79], [105499, 105545, 80], [105545, 105545, 81], [105545, 105626, 82], [105626, 107800, 83], [107800, 108677, 84], [108677, 110382, 85], [110382, 112534, 86], [112534, 112849, 87], [112849, 115235, 88], [115235, 117220, 89], [117220, 119025, 90], [119025, 122924, 91], [122924, 126429, 92], [126429, 128494, 93], [128494, 129012, 94], [129012, 130417, 95], [130417, 132062, 96], [132062, 132828, 97], [132828, 134846, 98], [134846, 136143, 99], [136143, 137026, 100], [137026, 138714, 101], [138714, 140558, 102], [140558, 142434, 103], [142434, 143152, 104], [143152, 144937, 105], [144937, 145651, 106], [145651, 147470, 107], [147470, 149280, 108], [149280, 151161, 109], [151161, 152905, 110], [152905, 154186, 111], [154186, 156062, 112], [156062, 157464, 113], [157464, 159219, 114], [159219, 160568, 115], [160568, 161656, 116], [161656, 163580, 117], [163580, 165560, 118], [165560, 167240, 119], [167240, 169023, 120], [169023, 170887, 121], [170887, 172523, 122], [172523, 173012, 123], [173012, 173260, 124], [173260, 173359, 125], [173359, 173583, 126], [173583, 173652, 127], [173652, 173652, 128], [173652, 175046, 129], [175046, 175894, 130], [175894, 176180, 131], [176180, 177034, 132], [177034, 177071, 133], [177071, 178479, 134], [178479, 179258, 135], [179258, 180244, 136], [180244, 180992, 137], [180992, 181856, 138], [181856, 182763, 139], [182763, 183824, 140], [183824, 184666, 141], [184666, 185878, 142], [185878, 187626, 143], [187626, 188953, 144], [188953, 190261, 145], [190261, 191493, 146], [191493, 192510, 147], [192510, 193811, 148], [193811, 194992, 149], [194992, 195830, 150], [195830, 196781, 151], [196781, 198121, 152], [198121, 198944, 153], [198944, 200040, 154], [200040, 200938, 155], [200938, 202593, 156], [202593, 203957, 157], [203957, 205576, 158], [205576, 207377, 159], [207377, 209164, 160], [209164, 210405, 161], [210405, 211227, 162], [211227, 212815, 163], [212815, 214237, 164], [214237, 215711, 165], [215711, 217101, 166], [217101, 219235, 167], [219235, 220471, 168], [220471, 221434, 169], [221434, 222462, 170], [222462, 223734, 171], [223734, 224941, 172], [224941, 226237, 173], [226237, 227203, 174], [227203, 228591, 175], [228591, 230403, 176], [230403, 231166, 177], [231166, 232768, 178], [232768, 234938, 179], [234938, 236173, 180], [236173, 237970, 181], [237970, 239896, 182], [239896, 241017, 183], [241017, 242372, 184], [242372, 243775, 185], [243775, 244223, 186], [244223, 245088, 187], [245088, 245786, 188], [245786, 247693, 189], [247693, 248689, 190], [248689, 249891, 191], [249891, 251140, 192], [251140, 251259, 193], [251259, 252342, 194], [252342, 252881, 195], [252881, 254398, 196], [254398, 257530, 197], [257530, 258195, 198], [258195, 259043, 199], [259043, 259839, 200], [259839, 261302, 201], [261302, 262820, 202], [262820, 264395, 203], [264395, 266036, 204], [266036, 267695, 205], [267695, 269444, 206], [269444, 271075, 207], [271075, 272818, 208], [272818, 274504, 209], [274504, 276160, 210], [276160, 277594, 211], [277594, 277594, 212], [277594, 278622, 213], [278622, 279702, 214], [279702, 279791, 215], [279791, 280644, 216], [280644, 282495, 217], [282495, 284282, 218], [284282, 285758, 219], [285758, 286024, 220], [286024, 289084, 221], [289084, 289257, 222], [289257, 289919, 223], [289919, 293541, 224], [293541, 296481, 225], [296481, 297840, 226], [297840, 300377, 227], [300377, 303887, 228], [303887, 306702, 229], [306702, 308374, 230], [308374, 311008, 231], [311008, 312263, 232], [312263, 315502, 233], [315502, 319199, 234], [319199, 320398, 235], [320398, 322174, 236], [322174, 322648, 237], [322648, 324738, 238], [324738, 326355, 239], [326355, 326567, 240], [326567, 329754, 241], [329754, 332780, 242], [332780, 336501, 243], [336501, 339496, 244], [339496, 342674, 245], [342674, 345706, 246], [345706, 348608, 247], [348608, 351350, 248], [351350, 354277, 249], [354277, 357017, 250], [357017, 359707, 251], [359707, 362653, 252], [362653, 365628, 253], [365628, 368018, 254], [368018, 368793, 255], [368793, 370190, 256], [370190, 371358, 257], [371358, 371562, 258], [371562, 371657, 259], [371657, 371702, 260], [371702, 372829, 261], [372829, 376553, 262], [376553, 378856, 263], [378856, 379256, 264], [379256, 381669, 265], [381669, 384519, 266], [384519, 387276, 267], [387276, 390251, 268], [390251, 391507, 269], [391507, 392162, 270], [392162, 394609, 271], [394609, 397747, 272], [397747, 400346, 273], [400346, 403238, 274], [403238, 403875, 275], [403875, 405000, 276], [405000, 405484, 277], [405484, 406490, 278], [406490, 407634, 279], [407634, 408788, 280], [408788, 409288, 281], [409288, 410242, 282], [410242, 411689, 283], [411689, 412561, 284], [412561, 413302, 285], [413302, 414115, 286], [414115, 414487, 287], [414487, 415869, 288], [415869, 417289, 289], [417289, 418639, 290], [418639, 419958, 291], [419958, 421303, 292], [421303, 422728, 293], [422728, 424089, 294], [424089, 425475, 295], [425475, 425671, 296], [425671, 426825, 297], [426825, 429131, 298], [429131, 430242, 299], [430242, 431422, 300], [431422, 432061, 301], [432061, 432209, 302], [432209, 432380, 303], [432380, 432638, 304], [432638, 433053, 305], [433053, 433343, 306], [433343, 434333, 307], [434333, 436066, 308], [436066, 439756, 309], [439756, 443744, 310], [443744, 444953, 311], [444953, 445159, 312], [445159, 445460, 313], [445460, 446471, 314], [446471, 446753, 315], [446753, 448436, 316], [448436, 452465, 317], [452465, 455264, 318], [455264, 455558, 319], [455558, 455860, 320], [455860, 456334, 321], [456334, 457538, 322], [457538, 458362, 323], [458362, 458906, 324], [458906, 459349, 325], [459349, 461081, 326], [461081, 463266, 327], [463266, 463865, 328], [463865, 463992, 329], [463992, 464678, 330], [464678, 465865, 331], [465865, 468266, 332], [468266, 472159, 333], [472159, 475823, 334], [475823, 478431, 335], [478431, 480082, 336], [480082, 483339, 337], [483339, 484073, 338], [484073, 484964, 339], [484964, 485952, 340], [485952, 486055, 341]]}}
{"id": "a8f985c98bb4fdced92a42abde763bcb00767ce2", "text": "FILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME:  KING, MARTIN LUTHER, JR.\n201-760-966\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY:\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 2-28-67       | 2-28-67       | RAGIN LINNEY             |                                |\n| 2-29-67       | 2-29-67       | WILLIAM A. WILK          |                                |\n| 2-29-67       | 2-29-67       | KEVIN T. SMITH           |                                |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE.\n| CIA NO. | DOCUMENT DATE | COPIES | DOCUMENT TITLE | ATTACHMENTS | CLASS |\n|---------|---------------|--------|----------------|-------------|-------|\n| 0 & 1   | CSCI 316/01702-68 | 3      |                |             | B     |\n\n**Recipient**\n\nS.J. Papich  \nFederal Bureau of Investigation  \nRoom 845, Riddell Bldg.  \n1730 K Street, N.W.  \nWashington, D.C.\n\n**Signature (Acknowledging Receipt of Attached Documents)**\n\n[Signature]\n\n**Office**\n\n[Office]\n\n**Date of Receipt**\n\n2 May 1959\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Director\nFederal Bureau of Investigation\n\nSUBJECT: Dr. Martin Luther KING, Jr.\n\n1. Reference is made to this Agency's out message number 94370 dated 23 April 1968 concerning the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther KING, Jr.\n\n2. On 16 April Roderick Clifton BROWN, a Panamanian national born 1 July 1917 in British Honduras, voluntarily appeared at the Department of National Investigations (DENI) of the Republic of Panama and signed a deposition, the highlights of which are as follows:\n\n   (1) On 26 October 1962 he served as cook/seaman aboard the Texaco S.S. Southampton which docked at Mobile, Alabama.\n\n   (2) While on a shore visit to the Mobile airport on the morning of 26 October 1962 in the company of two fellow Panamanian seamen, he was approached by Marvin P. LITRELL, owner of LITRELL Motor Co., 921-23 South Clinton Street, Athens, Alabama, who after ascertaining BROWN was a Panamanian seaman, asked if he knew of Dr. Martin Luther KING, Jr.\n\n   (3) LITRELL inquired whether BROWN was interested in employment, the details of which were unspecified. He went on to describe Dr. KING as \"Our greatest problem who is causing us much trouble.\" He gave BROWN a business card to use in the event he was interested in pursuing the employment offer.\n\n   (4) On 28 January 1963 BROWN wrote LITRELL from New York City, stating he was interested in a job and\nrequested $75 for travel from New York City to Mobile. On 2 February 1963 BROWN received a reply from LITTRELL, restating that he had a job waiting for BROWN in Alabama, but questioning why $75 was needed since the fare was less than $40 by bus.\n\n(5) After discussions with a relative and friends in New York City, BROWN suspected that the LITTRELL job offer was related with assassination plans for Dr. KING. Therefore he did not respond to the LITTRELL letter and dismissed the incident until the death of Dr. KING in April 1968. BROWN returned to Panama in 1964.\n\n3. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the LITTRELL letter and the Spanish language deposition made by BROWN, as well as an English translation of the deposition as described in paragraph 2 of the referenced out message.\n\nFOR THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR PLANS:\n\nSigned: James R. Hunt\n\nJAMES ANGLETON\n\nCSCI-316/01702-68\n\n3 Enclosures\n\nWH/2/Panama/G. Hodges:cib 2 May 1968\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 1 - Addressee, w/atts\n1 - CI/R&A (Dummy)\n1 - CI/LIA (Dummy)\n2 - CI/OPS/DO, w/atts\n1 - WH/2/Panama\n\nBased on: PANAMA CITY 6180 (IN 97566)\n| TO | ROOM NO | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n|----|---------|---------------|--------------------|\n| 1  | 111/RE6C | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 2  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 3  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 4  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 5  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 6  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 7  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 8  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 9  | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 10 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 11 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 12 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 13 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 14 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 15 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 16 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\n| 17 | 6/4/64 | 15 APR 1968 | x |\nSECRET TELEPOUCH\n\nDISP NO - UFGA-29884\nFILE NO - NONE\nDATE - 06 APRIL 1968\nINDEXING - NONE\nMICROFILM - NONE\nTO - CHIEF, WH DIVISION\nINFO - CHIEF, WH/COG - CHIEF, WOLME\nFROM - COS, JMWAVE\nSUBJECT - SUMMARY OF CUBAN MEDIA TREATMENT OF DEATH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., 14 APRIL 1968\nREFERENCE - UFGA-29877\n\nIN ADDITION TO THE SUMMARY OF CUBAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE MARTIN LUTHER KING ASSASSINATION TRANSMITTED IN REFERENCE, THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY FOR 8-9 APRIL HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY THE AMOIS - ON GRANMA, 0 APRIL, PAGE ONE - JUMOBILIZATION OF 55,000 TROOPS TO REPRESS THE NEGROES** A THE ARTICLE REPORTED ALL THE DISTURBANCES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED IN THE U.S. AS A RESULT OF THE DEATH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING.\n\nWH GRANMA, 0 APRIL, PAGE 3 A JWITH THE ASSASSINATION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING THE IDEOLOGY OF NON-VIOLENCE HAS DIED** A AN INTERVIEW WITH FLOYD MCKISSICK, NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE CONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY /CORE/. THIS SIMPLY MEANS THAT NON-VIOLENCE HAS CEASED AS A MEANS OF FIGHTING. THE PEOPLE CANNOT BE TAUGHT TO BE NON-VIOLENT WHILE WE ARE INVOLVED IN A VIOLENT WAR IN VIETNAM. NON-VIOLENCE CANNOT BE PREACHED TO THE BLACK PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO FACE VIOLENCE EVERY DAY ON THE STREETS OF THIS COUNTRY.** THIS WAS SAID IN A TELEPHONE CONVERSATION BETWEEN RADIO HABANA AND FLOYD MCKISSICK. WHEN ASKED ABOUT THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ASSASSINATION OF KING, MCKISSICK REPLIED - JJI REPEAT THAT WE ARE MAKING NO PREDICTIONS, BUT THE SECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29884 PAGE ONE\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29884 PAGE TWO\n\nAMERICAN NEGRO IS NOT WILLING TO CONTEMPLATE IMPOSSIBLY THE ASSASSINATION OF OUR LEADERS, OUR HEROES, AND OUR PEOPLE.\"\n\nEM GRANMA, 0 APRIL, PAGE 3 A ARTICLE BY JUAN MARRERO ENTITLED, JJ\"THE AMERICAN NEGROES ARE WRITING THEIR FINEST PAGE OF HEROISM.\" JJAGAINST ALL THAT AND MUCH MORE, THE NEGROES ROSE UP TODAY IN MORE THAN SIXTY CITIES. AND IT IS LOGICAL TO EXPECT NEW PAGES OF HEROISM. STOKELY CARMICHAEL, THE NEGRO LEADER, GAVE THIS WARNING ONE DAY AFTER THE DEATH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING - WHAT HAPPENED ON THE NIGHT WE LEARNED OF THE ASSASSINATION OF DR. KING IS NOTHING COMPARED TO WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.\" JJ\n\nRM GRANMA, 0 APRIL, PAGE 3 A JJ\"THE WIDOW OF LUTHER KING HEADS THE MARCH IN MEMPHIS.\" THE ARTICLE TELLS ABOUT THE MARCH AND SHOWS PHOTOGRAPHS OF IT.\n\nTM RADIO REBELDE NEWSCAST, 1 APRIL /755 A.M./ A JJ\"A TENSE CALM REIGNS IN THE U.S. BUT IT IS A PRELUDE TO SERIOUS EVENTS. NATIONAL MOURNING DECREED BY LYNDON JOHNSON FOR YESTERDAY, 1 APRIL, MARKS A LESSENING OF DEMONSTRATIONS WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO START UP AGAIN AT ANY MOMENT.\" JJ\n\nYM RADIO REBELDE NEWSCAST, 1 APRIL /955 A.M./ A JJ\"FORWARD WITH BLACK POWER UNTIL CAPITALIST MISERY, THE FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF HUMAN INJUSTICE, IS OVERTHROWN\" SAID THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF CHILE IN A CABLEGRAM SENT TO THE AMERICAN NEGRO LEADER, STOKELY CARMICHAEL, ON THE OCCASION OF THE ASSASSINATION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING.\" JJ\n\nUM RADIO LIBERACION, 1 APRIL /1230 P.M./ A THIS NEWSCAST REFERS TO A DEMONSTRATION IN WHICH 200 LATIN AMERICAN, ASIAN, AND AFRICAN STUDENTS WERE SAID TO HAVE PARTICIPATED IN FRONT OF THE U.S. EMBASSY IN WARSAW, POLAND, AS A PROTEST OVER THE DEATH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING.\n\nMARK F. EFFIELD\nDISTRIBUTION\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29884 PAGE TWO\nVIA TELEPOUCH\n3 A C/WHD\n2 A C/WH/COG\n2 A C/WOLINE\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29884 PAGE THREE\nBY\n| TO | ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n|----|----------|---------------|--------------------|\n| 1. | WH/REC   | 15 APR 1968   | Wc                 |\n| 2. | WH/006   |               |                    |\n| 3. | WH/100   |               |                    |\n| 4. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 5. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 6. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 7. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 8. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 9. | WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 10.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 11.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 12.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 13.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 14.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 15.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 16.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n| 17.| WH/006/EVO |            |                    |\n\n**Microfilmed APR 15 1968**\n\n**Doc. Micro Ser.**\n\n8-6-10C routed to WH/006/EVO for retention. 10C retained for WH/006/EVO file.\n\n12. File released into 201-760966 and 19-4-105.\n\nRelates to 19-4-105.\n\n**File Title:** 019-004-105\n\n**File Number:** 201-760966\nSECRET TELEPOUCH\n\nDISP NO - UFGA-29877\nFILE NO - NONE\nDATE - 29 APRIL 1968\nINDEXING - NONE\nMICROFILM - NONE\nTO - CHIEF, WH DIVISION\nINFO - CHIEF, WH/COG - CHIEF, WOLIKE\nFROM - CHIEF OF STATION, JMWAVER\nSUBJECT - SUMMARY OF CUBAN MEDIA TREATMENT OF THE DEATH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, TAI APRIL 1968\n\nTHE FOLLOWING SUMMARY OF CUBAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE MARTIN LUTHER KING ASSASSINATION DURING THE PERIOD 5-8 APRIL HAS BEEN PREPARED BY THE AMOTS-\n\n1. EM GRANMA /HAVANA DAILY NEWSPAPER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CUBA/, 7 APRIL 68, FRONT PAGE - \"LAST MINUTE NEWS - MARTIN LUTHER KING ASSASSINATED IN MEMPHIS, U.S.A. ACCORDING TO FIRST REPORTS, LUTHER KING HAS BEEN SHOT BY A 'WHITE WELL-DRESSED YOUNG MALE.'\"\n\n2. EM GRANMA, 7 APRIL, FRONT PAGE - \"TWENTY-SEVEN PERSONS HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE U.S. AS A RESULT OF THE FIGHTING WHICH HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE THE ASSASSINATION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING. IN WASHINGTON ALONE THERE ARE 750 WOUNDED AND 4,186 PERSONS ARRESTED. SNIPERS CONTINUE TO BE ACTIVE IN DIFFERENT CITIES IN THE U.S. THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE CAPITOL ARE UNDER HEAVY GUARD.\" /FULL INFORMATION GIVEN./\n\n3. EM GRANMA, 7 APRIL, LAST PAGE - \"TO RICHMOND TO LIBERATE RAP BROWN.\" \"WASHINGTON, 7 APRIL, ASSOCIATED FRENCH PRESS - AFP, FRENCH NEWS AGENCY AMX LEAFLETS WERE DISTRIBUTED HERE THIS MORNING, URGING THE NEGRO PEOPLE OF WASHINGTON TO GO TO RICHMOND TO LIBERATE RAP BROWN.\" \"THE LEAFLETS CALLED ON THE NEGROES TO FORM A MOTORCADE AND LEAVE FOR RICHMOND TOMORROW, MONDAY.\"\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE TWO\n\n4. GRANMA, 1 APRIL, LAST PAGE - ARTICLE ENTITLED \"PRINCIPAL NEGRO ORGANIZATIONS IN THE U.S.\", BY JUANA CARRASCO. THE ARTICLE SAYS THAT NEGRO ORGANIZATIONS ARE DIVIDED INTO TWO GROUPS - THE VIOLENT ONES AND THE NON-VIOLENT ONES. IT MENTIONS THE FOLLOWING AMONG THOSE WHICH ADVOCATE THE USE OF VIOLENCE - CONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY /CORE/, STUDENT NON-VIOLENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE /SNCC/, BLACK MUSLIMS, BLACK PANTHER PARTY, BLACKSTONE RANGERS, THE ALERT PATROL, REVOLUTIONARY ACTION MOVEMENT /RAN/, THE BLACK GUARDS, THE DEACONS, AND \"THE U.S.\". THE FOLLOWING NEGRO ORGANIZATIONS ARE MENTIONED AMONG THOSE WHICH ADVOCATE NON-VIOLENCE - NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE /NAACP/, NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, AND THE SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE /SCLC/.\n\n5. GRANMA, 1 APRIL, LAST PAGE - \"ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO BLAME CARMICHAEL FOR THE OUTBREAK OF RACIAL VIOLENCE IN THE U.S.\".\n\n6. GRANMA, 1 APRIL, LAST PAGE - \"RACIAL CLASHES BETWEEN NEGRO AND WHITE AMERICAN SOLDIERS IN JAPAN.\"\n\n7. GRANMA, 1 APRIL, LAST PAGE - \"THE AMERICAN NEGRO PEOPLE.\"\n\n8. GRANMA, 1 APRIL, LAST PAGE - \"MARTYRS OF THE NEGRO STRUGGLE.\"\n\n9. RADIO LIBERACION AND RADIO PROGRESO /HAVANA RADIO STATIONS/, 6 APRIL, 12 A.M. AND 12 NOON - \"THE CHIEF OF THE MISSION TO CUBA OF THE SOUTH VIETNAMESE NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT HAS SENT A MESSAGE TO AFRO-AMERICANS ON THE ASSASSINATION OF THE LEADER, MARTIN LUTHER KING. THIS MESSAGE SAYS THAT THE CRIME WHICH WAS COMMITTED AGAINST MARTIN LUTHER KING UNMASKS THE EVIL FACE OF THE RULERS AND RACISTS OF THE UNITED STATES.\" \"THE MESSAGE OF THE VIETNAMESE MISSION IN HAVANA ENDS BY SAYING THAT, WITH THE ASSASSINATION OF LUTHER KING, ALL THAT HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED BY THE RULERS OF THE UNITED STATES IS TO POUR OIL ONTO THE FLAMES OF THE STRUGGLE OF AFRO-AMERICANS.\"\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE THREE\n\nAND THAT THESE FLAMES ARE RISING VIOLENTLY TO PUT AN END TO ALL THE OPPRESSION AND INJUSTICE WHICH IS FOUND IN THE UNITED STATES, WHICH HINDERS THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.\n\n10:00 PM RADIO LIBERACION, 5 APRIL, REP P.M. - \"STOKELY CARMICHAEL, LEADER OF BLACK POWER, SAID - \"WE NEGROES MUST ARM OURSELVES WITH RIFLES AND PISTOLS AND LAUNCH AN ASSAULT ON THE STREETS OF THE CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN REPRISAL FOR KING'S ASSASSINATION.\"\n\nCARMICHAEL PREDICTED THAT THERE WILL BE EXECUTIONS IN THE STREETS AS A RESULT OF KING'S ASSASSINATION. HE ALSO PREDICTED THAT THE VIOLENCE WHICH HAS BEEN UNLEASHED BY NEGROES AS A RESULT OF KING'S DEATH WILL BE PALE AS COMPARED TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN AMERICAN CITIES.\n\n11:00 PM RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL, REP P.M. - \"HIS KING'S DEATH SHOWS ONCE AGAIN THAT THE EXPLOITED MASSES CAN ONLY ANSWER REACTIONARY VIOLENCE WITH REVOLUTIONARY VIOLENCE.\"\n\n11:00 PM RADIO PROGRESO, 5 APRIL, REP P.M. - \"CARMICHAEL SAID DURING A TELEPHONE INTERVIEW THAT \"A SERIOUS MISTAKE HAS BEEN MADE IN ASSASSINATING DR. KING BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN THE LEADER OF A MOVEMENT WHICH URGED THE NEGRO PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES NOT TO BURN THE CITIES, NOT TO COMMIT ACTS OF VIOLENCE. THIS MEANS THAT IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO START AN ALL-OUT REVOLUTION.\" CARMICHAEL ADDED - \"SERIOUS INCIDENTS HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN 35 CITIES WHERE THERE HAVE BEEN FIRES, SHOOTING, FIGHTING, AND DEATHS AS A RESULT OF THE CRIME COMMITTED AGAINST DR. KING. NATURALLY, OTHER SIMILAR THINGS WILL TAKE PLACE. GUERRILLA WARFARE WILL RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGH THE CITIES BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY EVIDENT THAT WE CANNOT OPENLY REBEL AGAINST THE POLICE.\" STOKELY CARMICHAEL ENDED THE INTERVIEW BY SENDING AFFECTIONATE REGARDS TO THE REVOLUTIONARY CUBAN PEOPLE AND THEIR LEADER, FIDEL CASTRO RUIZ.\"\n\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE THREE\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE FOUR\n\n13. RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL, 7 P.M. /JUAN /MARI /BRAS,\nSECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE MOVEMENT FOR THE INDEPENDENCE OF PUERTO RICO, MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IN A LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE INTERVIEW - \"DR. LUTHER KING'S ASSASSINATION WILL UNDOUBTEDLY PRECIPITATE THE REBELLION OF THE NEGRO PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL THE ABUSES OF WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN THE OBJECT.\"\n\n14. RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL, 7 P.M. /THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT OF THE ASIAN, AFRICAN, AND LATIN AMERICAN PEOPLES SOLIDARITY ORGANIZATION /AALAPSO/ SENT A MESSAGE OF CONDOLENCE TO THE SNCC ON THE ASSASSINATION OF LUTHER KING.\"\n\n15. \"THE AALAPSO'S MESSAGE TO THE AMERICAN PACIFIST ORGANIZATION ENDS AS FOLLOWS: \"WE BEG YOU TO EXPRESS TO THE FAMILY OF MARTIN LUTHER KING AND TO ALL AFRO-AMERICANS OUR DEEPEST SORROW OVER HIS DEATH, OUR DECISION TO SUPPORT YOUR STRUGGLE, AND OUR DEEP CONVICTION THAT THIS TERRIBLE CRIME--WHICH SHOWS US THAT ARMED REVOLUTIONARY VIOLENCE IS THE ONLY WAY OF ACHIEVING GENUINE LIBERATION--WILL HELP STRENGTHEN THE STRUGGLE OF THE AFRO-AMERICAN PEOPLE WHICH IS ALREADY AIMED IN THE DIRECTION OF A TOTAL CONFRONTATION.\"\n\n16. RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL, 7 P.M. /JAGUSTIN /GONZALEZ/\nMARTINEZ, BISHOP OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF CUBA, MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IN A SPECIAL INTERVIEW - \"MAY THE TRAGIC DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS GREAT LEADER AT LEAST HELP TO SPEED UP THE ARRIVAL OF THE DAY WHEN EVERY MAN IN HIS NATION AND IN ALL OTHER NATIONS WILL BE TREATED WITH THE RESPECT WHICH IS DUE TO THEM AS HUMAN BEINGS.\"\n\n17. RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL, 7 P.M. /REVEREND RAFAEL PASTOR,\nOF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN LUYANO, HAVANA, MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IN A SPECIAL INTERVIEW - \"HIS BROTHERS, THE AMERICAN NEGROES, WILL LEARN MUCH FROM HIS DEATH. WE CAN ALMOST ASSURE THAT THEY, THE AMERICAN NEGROES WHOSE DIGNITY AND DECORUM HAS BEEN CRUSHED, WILL COME BACK TO LIFE AFTER CENTURIES OF LETHARGY AND\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE FIVE\n\nWILL RISE FROM THEIR GRAVES AND FORM AN INVINCIBLE ARMY.\"\n\n\"RADIO LIBERACION, 5 APRIL, 6 P.M. EDITORIAL COMMENTS\nCRITICIZING THE NON-VIOLENT LINE WHICH WAS ADVOCATED BY LUTHER KING,\nSAYING THAT THIS LINE WAS INOPERATIVE. \"MARTIN LUTHER KING DID NOT\nPREACH VIOLENCE BUT HE WAS THE VICTIM OF VIOLENCE. HE DID NOT\nUNLEASH VIOLENCE BUT VIOLENCE MOVED HIM DOWN.\"\n\n\"RADIO HABANA, 5 APRIL 68, 12 P.M. \"JOHNSON POSTPONED\nHIS TRIP. HE CALLED THE CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS--WHO WERE MORE OR\nLESS UNDER CONTROL--TO GO TO THE WHITE HOUSE. JOHNSON APPEARED ON\nTELEVISION. HE EXPRESSED HIS ANGUISH AND HIS SORROW. HE MADE\nINSPIRED COMMENTS ABOUT MARTIN LUTHER KING. THESE ACTIONS AND THESE\nWORDS HIDE FEAR OVER THE WAVE OF JUST VIOLENCE WHICH IS STARTING TO\nSPREAD THROUGH THE UNITED STATES.\"\n\n\"AT A TIME WHEN COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS MIGHT BE UNDERWAY, UNDER DIFFICULT CONDITIONS,\nTHIS NEW CRIME WIDENS THE CHASM WHICH DIVIDES THE PEOPLE OF THE\nUNITED STATES AND INCITES THE PEOPLE TO PROMOTE DISTURBANCES WHOSE\nFAR-REACHING EFFECTS ARE HARD TO PREDICT.\"\n\n\"THE ASSASSINATION OF\nMARTIN LUTHER KING CONFIRMS THAT THE VIOLENCE OF IMPERIALIST RACISTS\nIS ONLY ANSWERED EFFECTIVELY WITH THE VIOLENCE OF THE REVOLUTIONARY\nSTRUGGLE.\"\n\nMARK F. EFFIELD\nDISTRIBUTION\nVIA TELEPOUCH\n3 A C/WHD\n2 A C/WHD/COG\n2 A C/WOLINE\n\nSECRET TELEPOUCH UFGA-29877 PAGE FIVE\n| TO: | ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n|-----|----------|---------------|--------------------|\n| 1.  |          | 6 APR 1968    |                    |\n| 2.  |          |               |                    |\n| 3.  |          |               |                    |\n| 4.  |          |               |                    |\n| 5.  |          |               |                    |\n| 6.  |          |               |                    |\n| 7.  |          |               |                    |\n| 8.  |          |               |                    |\n| 9.  |          |               |                    |\n| 10. |          |               |                    |\n| 11. |          |               |                    |\n| 12. |          |               |                    |\n| 13. |          |               |                    |\n| 14. |          |               |                    |\n| 15. |          |               |                    |\n| 16. |          |               |                    |\n| 17. |          |               |                    |\n\n**CHRONO DETACHED**\n\n**MICROFILMED**\n\nAPR 15 1968\n\nDOC. MICRO. BER.\n\nPlease route on separate Routing slip to Dick Ober, Staff, 2nd floor, 2nd floor, 2nd floor.\n\n92-4-16\n\n022-004-016.\n1. Attached for Headquarters retention are one copy each of statements on the death of Martin Luther King by the Dominican Communist Party (PCD), the Communist 14th of June Revolutionary Movement (MR-14J), and various trade unions. All appeared in the 7 April 1968 issue of El Nacional.\n\n2. The text of the PCD statement makes reference to the visit of Stokely Carmichael to the Latin American Solidarity Organization Conference (LASO), quotes a statement by Fidel Castro on Carmichael and the concept of \"Black Power,\" and expresses the solidarity of the PCD with the struggle of North American Negroes. The MR-14J statement, only available in gist, says that King's death reveals the profound crisis existing within US society and shows that for the \"racist forces,\" violence is the only law and is applied to internal and external enemies alike.\n\n3. Neither statement issues a call to violence on the part of US Negroes.\n\nStewart R. Pataker\n\nATTACHMENT:\nAs Stated Herewith\n\nDISTRIBUTION:\n3 - Chief, WH Division w/att: h/w\n3 - Files w/att\n\nDATE TYPED: 10 Apr 68\nDATE DISPATCHED: 22-4-16\nCondenan Asesinato De Martin Luther King\n\nDos organizaciones izquierdistas condenaron hoy la muerte del reverendo Martin Luther King. En comunidades separadas el Partido Comunista Dominicano y el Movimiento Revolucionario 14 de Julio dicen solidarizarse con el movimiento negro de los Estados Unidos.\n\nEl PCD se\u00f1ala que el asesinato del l\u00edder pac\u00edfico ha tenido \"una respuesta\" en la violencia desatada en las ciudades m\u00e1s importantes de los Estados Unidos que ha obligado a que el presidente Johnson cancelara su viaje al exterior para conversaciones de paz en Vietnam.\n\nDices respaldar la rebeli\u00f3n, y los pronunciamientos del l\u00edder negro Stokely Carmichael en que el \u00fanico camino en los Estados Unidos para librarse de la violencia de los males que padecen ese pueblo es la violencia revolucionaria que derribar\u00e1 el sistema imperialista.\n\nEl PCD demand\u00f3 de las organizaciones pol\u00edticas y sindicales desarrollar actividades en apoyo a la lucha de los negros norteamericanos.\n\nPor su parte el 14 de Junio consider\u00f3 que el asesinato del Premio N\u00f3bel de la Paz revela la profunda crisis en que ha entrado la sociedad norteamericana.\n\nDemuestra, seg\u00fan el 14 de Junio, que para las fuerzas raciales la \u00fanica ley en la violencia y que esta es aplicada a todo enemigo interno o externo que se revele contra el imperio brutal.\n\nEntiende la organizaci\u00f3n pol\u00edtica que la muerte del reverendo Luther King es una gran ense\u00f1anza para los de su raza que sufren la opresi\u00f3n racial.\nPARTIDO COMUNISTA DOMINICANO (PCD)\n\n\u00a1Nuestra solidaridad plena con la lucha de los negros norteamericanos, como parte que es de la lucha de todos los oprimidos de la tierra!\n\nEl r\u00e9gimen de los monopolios imperialistas norteamericanos se comove por la acci\u00f3n de los pueblos desde fuera con Vietnam al frente, y desde dentro con el gran movimiento por los derechos civiles y por la paz. El asesinato de L\u00father King, ser\u00e1 presentado como la obra de la mano fant\u00e1stica de un racista; pero queda clara la responsabilidad de los interesados en liquidar la acci\u00f3n civil por la violencia, de los interesados en imponer la mordaza a los reclamos del pueblo que cada vez m\u00e1s lucha organizadamente y que comprende los objetivos de esa lucha, de los monopolios imperialistas.\n\nLa violencia engendra violencia, luchas siglos de explotaci\u00f3n y de represi\u00f3n han pasado hasta que en los \u00faltimos a\u00f1os el negro norteamericano comienza a organizar su resistencia; y en ello el papel de L\u00father King es innegable, de los m\u00e1s altos m\u00e9ritos, de la m\u00e1s encomiable abnegaci\u00f3n, aunque su pr\u00e9dica de paz no haya sido comprendida por todos los oprimidos ni la m\u00e1s apropiada como lo demuestra su propia muerte.\n\nLos negros constituyen en los Estados Unidos el sector m\u00e1s explotado de la clase obrera en el nivel de sueldos, en la discriminaci\u00f3n social que asume formas raciales, en la proporci\u00f3n de los que participan en el ej\u00e9rcito, en los papeles de seguros sociales; por lo que la discriminaci\u00f3n y su respuesta en la lucha por los derechos civiles tiene caracter\u00edsticas esencialmente cl\u00e1sicas aunque asuma formas raciales, y por lo que crecientemente este fen\u00f3meno se comprende por las propias masas blancas que apoyan los reclamos civiles de la poblaci\u00f3n de raza africana marginada de la sociedad.\nGreen Disturbios\nInfluiran en Dolar\n\nARIS, 6 de abril (AP). El\nllamado de los disturbios raciales\nen Estados Unidos, cuya primera\nmanifestaci\u00f3n fue el asesinato del\npadre de la paz, Martin Luther King, reper-\ncuete en una nueva crisis del d\u00f3lar,\nque hoy aqu\u00ed los observadores\nhanseado.\n\nEn efecto, el desencadenamiento\nde la violencia va a obstaculizar\nla disponibilidad presupuestaria\ndel Tesoro de Estados Unidos.\n\nTambi\u00e9n se comprueba ese re-\ntraso en las escuelas y centros\nsociales, as\u00ed como la estrecha co-\nrelaci\u00f3n que existe entre el sub-\nempleo de una inmensa masa y\nla disponibilidad para los\ndisturbios raciales, agrega el ex\nministro franc\u00e9s.\n\nPor ello, Washington proyecta\nhacer adoptar r\u00e1pidamente un pro-\nyecto de ley el que Martin Luther\nKing ha propuesto.\n\nLa situaci\u00f3n es cr\u00edtica, y el\nTesoro de Estados Unidos\nha de tomar medidas dr\u00e1sticas\npara evitar una crisis financiera.\n\nLa medida m\u00e1s importante\nser\u00eda la reducci\u00f3n de los\ngastos presupuestarios,\nque hoy est\u00e1n en niveles\nexcesivos.\n\nLa situaci\u00f3n es cr\u00edtica, y el\nTesoro de Estados Unidos\nha de tomar medidas dr\u00e1sticas\npara evitar una crisis financiera.\n\nLa medida m\u00e1s importante\nser\u00eda la reducci\u00f3n de los\ngastos presupuestarios,\nque hoy est\u00e1n en niveles\nexcesivos.\n\u00a1PROTESTAMOS POR EL ASESINATO DE MARTIN LUTHER KING!\n\u00a1SOLIDARIDAD CON LOS NEGROS EN LUCHA!\n\nMartin Luther King, l\u00edder pacifista del movimiento negro norteamericano, Premio N\u00f3bel de la Paz, ha sido asesinado por los opresores de su pueblo y de todos los pueblos explotados del Mundo.\n\nSU DELITO: Luchar por la liberaci\u00f3n de los negros, contra la discriminaci\u00f3n racial, contra las vejaciones y la explotaci\u00f3n que sufren sus hermanos de raza en los Estados Unidos. Es el \"delito\" que le cargan quienes gobernaban para el mal a todos aquellos que se rebelan, que luchan por la libertad.\n\nLa muerte de King ha conmovido al Mundo porque evidencia en forma aterradora hasta d\u00f3nde pueden llegar los raciamientos racistas que controlan el poder en los Estados Unidos.\n\nLa violencia rebeld\u00eda de los negros y de todos los dem\u00f3cratas corrientes de nuevo a estremecer la sociedad norteamericana.\n\nLa solidaridad internacional con su causa se expresa en m\u00faltiples formas.\n\nY nosotros, los obreros dominicanos, elevamos nuestra voz de protesta y llamamos a la solidaridad activa con toda manifestaci\u00f3n de lucha, que dentro y fuera de los Estados Unidos, exprese el repudio a ese hecho bochornoso.\n\nAdoptamos esta actitud consistente de que al sumarnos a la protesta mundial nos colocamos junto al sector m\u00e1s oprimido y vejado de la clase obrera norteamericana: los trabajadores negros. Y de que esos sufrimientos de frente a los poderosos que con hipocres\u00eda unos y con cinismo otros, dicen lamentar la muerte del l\u00edder negro, mientras preparan las bayonetas para tratar de aplastar la lucha desenfrenada, nada.\n\nNada han hecho los gobernantes y obligados de nuestra tierra en protesta por el asesinato de Luther King. Duros interminables habr\u00e1n realizado si la acci\u00f3n justiciera de los pueblos ha terminado con la vida de Johnson o de otro magnate de la explotaci\u00f3n imperialista. Pero Luther King era un representante de los negros explotados, un luchador por los derechos civiles de los negros que a su entender no merec\u00eda homenaje alguno.\n\nSin embargo, Luther King tiene en nosotros a sus representantes dominicanos, a los que encarnamos en esta tierra los intereses del trabajo y del progreso de toda la humanidad. Y por eso, en esta ocasi\u00f3n, tambi\u00e9n damos un paso al frente:\n\nLlamamos a todos los hombres honestos de nuestra Patria a manifestar su solidaridad con la causa de los negros norteamericanos.\n\nLlamamos a las dem\u00e1s organizaciones de trabajadores a repudiar el asesinato de Luther King y a solidarizarse con la lucha de los negros norteamericanos.\n\nLlamamos a la Universidad Aut\u00f3noma de Santo Domingo y a los ayuntamientos democr\u00e1ticos del pa\u00eds, para que, amparados en su autonom\u00eda, declaren tres d\u00edas de duelo por el asesinato de Luther King.\n\nQue en las f\u00e1bricas, en las escuelas, en las oficinas y en todos los centros de trabajo se rinda homenaje al l\u00edder asesinado y se exprese nuestro apoyo al pueblo negro de los Estados Unidos que es criminalmente colocado en la primera l\u00ednea de fuego en Vietnam, al mismo tiempo que en su propio pa\u00eds se le somete a la m\u00e1s cruel explotaci\u00f3n.\n\n\u00a1MANTENGAMOS LA SOLIDARIDAD ACTIVA HASTA QUE NUESTROS HERMANOS NEGROS DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS CONQUISTEN TODOS SUS DERECHOS!\n\nFEDERACION DE TRABAJADORES REVOLUCIONARIOS UNIDOS DEL DISTRITO NACIONAL (PETRUDINA)\nFEDERACION NACIONAL DE TRABAJADORES PORTUARIOS\nFEDERACION NACIONAL DE TRABAJADORES DE LA INDUSTRIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION Y SUS AFINES (FENATRAICA)\nSINDICATO PORTUARIO DE LOS MOLINOS DOMINICANOS\nSINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES PORTUARIOS DE AHRIMO (POJAS)\nSINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES DE LOS MOLINOS DOMINICANOS\nSINDICATO DE LA SOCIEDAD INDUSTRIAL DOMINICANA (MANCERA)\nASOCIACION DE CUBREPIEZAS INDEPENDIENTES (ACORCHI)\nASOCIACION DE EMPLEADOS DE LA UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE SANTO DOMINGO\nSINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES TELEFONICOS\nSINDICATO DE COBRADORES DE AFOBIJES DE SANTO DOMINGO\nSINDICATO DE OPERARIOS SASTRES DEL DISTRITO NACIONAL\nSINDICATO DE OBREROS Y EMPLEADOS DEL AYUNTAMIENTO DEL DISTRITO NACIONAL\nSINDICATO DE LA PAPELERA INDUSTRIAL\nSINDICATO NACIONAL DE CARPINTEROS\n\n022-004-016\n\nEl Nacional\n7 abril 1968\n| SUBJECT OF DOCUMENT | DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|\n|                     |                         |\n\n| RS FILE NO. | 201-111911 |\n|-------------|------------|\n| SOURCE DOC. | 201-760966 |\n| SYMBOL NO.  | SEX M DOB 7 |\n| DATE        | 11 MAR 68 |\n| SOURCE CRYPTO | FBI |\n| DATE OF INFO | INFO RE PLANS FOR A MASSIVE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE DEMONSTRATION IN THE NATIONS CAPITAL THIS SPRING |\n| EVALUATION  |            |\n\n| ANALYST | DATE PROCESSED | DISSEMINATED IN | DATE |\n|---------|----------------|-----------------|------|\n|         |                |                 |      |\n\n| CROSS REFERENCE TO THIS FILE | TRANSFERRED TO |\n|------------------------------|----------------|\n|                              | RS FILE NO.    |\n|                              |                |\n\n| PERTINENT INFORMATION |\n|-----------------------|\n| KING, MARTIN LUTHER   |\n| 201-760966            |\n| SEX M DOB 7           |\n| OCC 7                 |\n| CIT 2                 |\n| INFO RE PLANS FOR A MASSIVE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE DEMONSTRATION IN THE NATIONS CAPITAL THIS SPRING |\n\nFILE IN 201-260266\nACTION REQUIRED: For your information\n\n1. IDEN A, a cleared and willing contact, provided the following information which was obtained during a surveillance of IDEN C. The surveillance was a joint effort of IDEN A and local ODENVY. ODENVY is not aware that IDEN A has passed the information to JNWAVE.\n\n2. On Thursday, 19 May 1966, a surveillance was instituted from Room 618 of IDEN B on adjoining Room 620, which was occupied by IDEN C and his aide IDEN D. The surveillance was initiated at 11:00 a.m. and terminated at 5:15 p.m. During the conversation between IDENS C and D and another unknown Negro male, believed to be IDEN E, references were made to the Florida Gubernatorial Race; a trip to Bimini; and several miscellaneous sex experiences.\n\n3. On 20 May 1966 a search was made of rooms 620 and 622 after IDENS C and D moved out. Forwarded under separate cover are copies of items found in the waste baskets and dressers; a hotel bill, and a list of telephone numbers which were called on 18 - 19 May 1966.\n\n4. Of special interest among these items was a note which stated, IDEN F, please call Long Distance Operator IDEN G. IDEN H, according to IDEN A, is an identified member of the Communist Party. Also, an envelope of IDEN B with the name IDEN I. This person may have been one of the occupants of the room who remained in the company of IDENS C and D overnight.\n\n5. JNWAVE traces were negative on all personalities mentioned above as well as those names appearing in the date forwarded under separate cover. JNWAVE has carded only those personalities who reside in the JNWAVE area.\n\nAttachment:\nA. IDENS A-1 u/s/c\nB. ITEMS u/s/c\n\nDISTRIBUTION:\n3 - Chief/KUSODA w/att\n1 - Chief, WH Division w/o att\n\nDATE TYPED: 15 July 1966\nDATE DISPATCHED: 15 July 1966\nD'SPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER: UFCT - 16828\nHEADQUARTERS FILE NUMBER: 16828\nSeparate Cover Attachment A to UFGT - 16828\n\nIDEN A  Lt. Leslie J. Van Buskirk\n         Chief, Criminal Intelligence\n         Dade County Public Safety (Metro)\n         Miami, Florida\n\nIDEN B  Miami International Airport\n\nIDEN C  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.\n\nIDEN D  Bernard Lee\n\nIDEN E  Dr. Brown\n\nIDEN F  Dr. King, Jr.\n\nIDEN G  #71, Homestead, N.Y.\n         Telephone # 487-5199\n         Mr. Harry Wachtell and signed Lillian\n\nIDEN H  Mr. Harry Wachtell\n\nIDEN I  Miss Maxine Thurston\n\nDistribution:\n\n1 - Chief, WH Division\nDear Mr. Martin,\n\nI am writing to inform you of a change in my address. My new address is 40 W 135th St, NY, NY. My office number is 206-9593, and my home number is 702-9861.\n\nPlease make the necessary changes to your records.\n\nSincerely,\n\n[Signature]\n\nIf and when your address and/or school changes after joining CTA, please correct on post card or phone CTA (313-2333). This will insure services.\n\nBack side of card.\nFRIDAY\n29\nAPR. 1966\n\n-APPOINTMENTS-\n\n8:00\n8:30\n9:00\n9:30\n10:00\n10:30\n11:00\n11:30\n12:00\n1:00\n1:30\n2:00\n2:30\n3:00\n3:30\n4:00\n4:30\n5:00\n5:30\n\nDr. King Jr.\nPlease call\nLong Distance\nOperator 71\nHastings New York\n487-5199\nMr. Harry Wachtel\n(Lunch)\n| QUANTITY | DESCRIPTION | PRICE |\n|----------|-------------|-------|\n| 1        | Cabana Hat | 14.95 |\n| 2        | Socks      | 2.45  |\n| 1        | Necktie    | 7.95  |\n| 1        | Sweater    | 29.5  |\n| 1        | Jacket     | 30.0  |\n\nTotal: $135.00\n\nTHANK YOU\n\nPlease keep this copy for reference.\n\nNo. 122912 Rec'd by 6/4/10\nMEMORANDUM\n\nFrom: [Name]\nDate: [Date]\n\nSubject: Phone Calls - 5/18/66\n\n- 696 - 8521 111 - COCA M. KINSEY 1405 NW 51 ST.\n- NE-4 - 4842 111 - ALICE FRANCIS 4731 NW 15 AVE.\n- 758 - 7650 111 - MAXINE THURSTON 26th Rotary Pl.\n- NE-5 - 1275 111 - GEORGE A. MILLER 2535 N. RIVER DR., MIN.\n- NE-5 - 2058 111 - PATRICIA D. REEVE 1001 N. W. 12 AVE, MIN.\n- NE-5 - 4941 111 - MRS. MARY J. McCOY 4950 N. W. 15 COURT, MIN.\n- 888 - 5211 111 - SEE OTHER SIDE\n- NE-3 - 33 111 - NATIONAL AIRLINES\n\n5/19/66\n\n- 661 - 2511 111 - U. OF MIAMI, ASHE MEMORIAL BLDG.\n- M07 - 0006 111 - W. IVAN HOY 5881 S. W. 52 TER.\n- 377 - 3681 111 - GREATER MI. URBAN LEAGUE\n- 758 - 7659 111 - MAXINE THURSTON 1307 N. W. 81 TERR.\n- 374 - 4212 111 - I. CHALKS FLYING SERVICE, MACARTHUR CAUSE.\n- 377 - 9445 111 - MACKAY AIRLINES, FORT LAUD.\n- 635 - 1275 111 - SEE GEORGE A. MILLER ABOVE.\n- 751 - 6692 111 - WCKT TELEVISION STATION\n- 691 - 3311 111 - NAT. AIRLINES\n- NE-4 - 4842 111 - ALICE FRANCIS 4731 NW 15 AVE.\n888-5211\nAIRWAYS HOTEL\n\"Motel\"\nLENNYS HIDEAWAY\nL.A. WIEN INVESTMENTS\nMIAMI AIRWAYS HOTEL\nMIAMI AIRWAYS MOTEL\n5055 N.W. 36 St.\n### Diners Club Receipt\n\n**Establishment:**\n- **The Diners Club**\n- **3212113884**\n- **Sheraton Chicago Hotel**\n- **Chicago, Ill.**\n\n**Record of Charge:**\n- **Date:** 11/15\n- **Amount:** $1100\n- **Taxes:** $51\n- **Tips and Misc.:** $2.75\n- **Total:** $1253.75\n\n**Cardholder's Signature:**\n- Handwritten signature: \"S. Nelson 23456789\"\n\n**Note:** The amount of the charges recorded herein were incurred by Mr. and Mrs. Martin L. King Jr. for the sum amount of the charges shown above.\n\n**Cardholder's Receipt:**\n- **Cardholder:** Diners Club\n- **Expiry:**\n\n---\n\n**Handwritten Notes:**\n- \"723 9126\"\nMr. King\n\n8:30 P.M.\n\nMiss Hines\n\n8:30\n\nAt 1 Willey Dr.\n\nby good dinner\n\nMiss Marine Houston\n| Item | Description | Amount |\n|------|-------------|--------|\n| 1    | Ties        | 20     |\n| 2    | Shirts      | 15     |\n| 3    | Slacks      | 12     |\n| 4    | Suits       | 20     |\n| 5    | Ties        | 7      |\n\nTotal: 37471\n| TO | ROOM NO | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER INITIALS |\n|----|---------|---------------|------------------|\n| 1  |         | 12/4          |                  |\n| 2  |         |               |                  |\n| 3  |         |               |                  |\n| 4  |         |               |                  |\n| 5  |         |               |                  |\n| 6  |         |               |                  |\n| 7  |         |               |                  |\n| 8  |         |               |                  |\n| 9  |         |               |                  |\n| 10 |         |               |                  |\n| 11 |         |               |                  |\n| 12 |         |               |                  |\n| 13 |         |               |                  |\n| 14 |         |               |                  |\n| 15 |         |               |                  |\n| 16 |         |               |                  |\n\n**WEH DIAMOND - DELETED**\n\n**FB1 Request**\n\n**Reclassification**\n\n100-2-18\nPlease transmit to the Legal Attach\u00e9 the attached memo which is in response to his inquiry of 17 March 1966.\n\nLeon S. TOZALL\n\nAttachment:\nMemo re Martin Luther King, Jr. 201-760-066\n\nDistribution:\n2 - COS, London w/att\n2 - Chief, WE w/att\n\nCS COPY\n\n100-002-018\n201-760450\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\nDATE\nSECRET\n\nQ/00A-19623\n30 March 1966\nSECRET\n\nSUBJECT: MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.\n\nWe have no information that Subject appeared at a rally in Oslo to date, nor does the Embassy have knowledge of a future visit of KING to Norway.\n\nAny future information which becomes available will be forwarded to you. We have also taken due note of your desire that the Norwegian authorities not know of your interest in Subject's activities.\n\nCS COPY\nTO: Director\nFederal Bureau of Investigation\nAttention: F. S. J. English\n\nFROM: Deputy Director for Plans\n\nSUBJECT: Martin Luther King, Jr.\n\n1. Reference is made to a communication from your Bureau dated 20 August 1964, concerning proposed travel to Western Europe of Martin Luther King, Jr. Reference notes that subject planned to visit Rome, Italy, on 18 and 19 September 1964.\n\n2. This Agency has received the following information on subject from a source who is considered unreliable. Mr. Martin Luther King, Jr. met with various leaders of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) and of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) on 18 September 1964 in Rome. He discussed with these Italian politicians the program of demonstrations against segregation in the United States which are to be organized in Italy during the months immediately ahead. Mr. King reportedly conferred with PCI Senator Valerio Spada and with PSI Senator Paolo Vittorini, and with Deputy Minister D'Amato of the Italian Socialist Party of Proletarian Unity (PSIUP).\n\n3. This Agency is unable to evaluate the above report.\n\nThe information in paragraph two has been made available to your Bureau's representative in Rome.\n\nCSC: 316/32051-64\n\nWE/CE/ R. Brockmeyer: ace (21 November 1964)\n\nDistribution:\nOrig: 1 - Addressee\n1 - CI\n1 - CIA\n1 - FI (201-760966)\n2 - WE/CE\n\nBased on: GFR-6733 dated 20 October 1964\n\nSECRET\n\nCS COPY\n\n30 Mar 1964\n| FROM | TO | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------|----|------|--------------------|----------|\n|      | W. J. Searle | 23 Nov 1966 | CE | 23 Nov 1966 | orig 2014, unit 1 |\n|      | J. H. Moore | 25 Nov 1966 | CE | 23 Nov 1966 | orig 2014, unit 1 |\n|      | B. B. Bocelli | 80/82/4 | CE | 23 Nov 1966 | orig 2014, unit 1 |\n\nHandwritten notes:\n- 201-760-966\n- Signed by [unreadable]\n- Handwritten note: \"Thank you, W. J. Searle, 1974\"\nREFERENCE: OIRT-6733, 20 October 1964\n\nACTION REQUIRED: For your information.\n\nForwarded herewith is a memorandum prepared for PRESSLAND's information concerning an article attributed to Martin Luther KING that appeared in the 22 October issue of the PCI organ, Vie Nuove. Also forwarded is a copy of the 24 October issue of Rinascita which reprints on its last page an article by KING that, according to an editorial note, was originally published in The Nation.\n\nKenneth L. Pettijohn\nKENNETH L. PETTIJOHN\n\nAttachments: as stated.\n\nDistribution: 3-C/WE, w/atts.\n\nNOV 17 1964\nSUBJECT: Article by Martin Luther King in Vie Nuove, 22 October 1964.\n\n1. The article entitled \"What We Negroes Ask of the President\" and attributed to Martin Luther King, published on pages 15 and 17 of the 22 October 1964 issue of the Italian Communist Party organ Vie Nuove, is a straightforward expression of the hopes and aspirations of the American Negro population and of its determination to continue the struggle by non-violent means until full social and economic equality has been obtained. The article does not contain anything which could be considered as typical communist propaganda nor anything that seems to be directed specifically to a communist audience. The article, under King's byline, would be perfectly proper for any American publication.\n\n2. At the beginning of the article, Vie Nuove includes the following editorial comment:\n\nThe racial problem is one of the subjects that most divides the American states in this presidential election. This article, by Martin Luther King, that we published exclusively, illuminates its most dramatic aspects and expresses the requests that the colored population advances to the entire nation. It is a denunciation of the inequality of rights that goes beyond the secular racial question. The \"you must respect my person\" is a request that the problem of Democracy poses for everyone.\n\n3. Despite the date of its publication the article appears to have been written some months ago. This is evident from King's reference in the article to the fact that the Civil Rights Bill was before Congress at the time he was writing the article. The Bill, it will be recalled, was enacted into law on 2 July 1964. The conclusion to be drawn from this is that the article's appearance in Vie Nuove or at least, its composition by King, is not the direct result of any contacts that King may have had with PCI officials during his visit to Rome in mid-September.\nLotta di classe e riunificazione politica\n\nInterviste con Vecchietti Lombardi\n\nLa politica del Ventesimo\n\nLe decisioni di Mosca, per l'importanza del loro avvenimento, per il peso che esso \u00e8 chiamato ad avere nelle prospettive della vita sovietica e del movimento operaio internazionale, non potevano non suscitare interrogativi, non diventare argomento di riflessione e di dibattito ben oltre le frontiere dell'Unione Sovietica. La procedura di quelle decisioni e il modo contraddittorio, tale da lasciare ancora vaste zone d'ombra, col quale sono state comunicate, hanno certo determinato una certa tensione, che \u00e8 che l'affanno della crisi del centro-sinistra e del naufragio delle sue prospettive politiche impedisce a certi democratici e a taluni socialisti di guardare al di l\u00e0 dei voti delle prossime elezioni municipali, anche quando si tratta della prospettiva mondiale. Con il risultato, crediamo, di non veder chiaro n\u00e9 quello che pu\u00f2 accadere nel mondo, n\u00e9 quello che accadr\u00e0 nel municipio.\n\nA noi spetta ribadire, anche in questa occasione, una politica che ci pare fondamentale...\nCarri armati a Jackson\ndi Martin Luther King\n\nMart\u00edn Luther King Jr. ha dichiarato, in un'intervista, che l'assunzione del potere \u00e8 stata un'azione giusta per il premio Nobel della pace. Dall'ultimo dei suoi rapporti pubblicati, \u00e8 stato rivelato che The Nation, la rivista che ha pubblicato l'intervista, ha poste in evidenza le sue idee in un articolo. La rivista ha riferito che King ha parlato delle questioni che affliggono il paese, e ha sottolineato la necessit\u00e0 di un cambiamento radicale per affrontare i problemi sociali.\n\nPer molti anni, il passato, la storia dei diritti civili \u00e8 stata ostacolata da una confusa molteplicit\u00e0 di tattiche. Nel primo periodo del governo Kennedy, si \u00e8 sostenuto che la posizione di Kennedy era che l'assunzione del potere era necessaria per determinare il cambiamento. Prima ancora che il movimento per i diritti civili inizi\u00f2 una campagna in quella direzione, l'assunzione del potere \u00e8 stata un'azione giusta per il premio Nobel della pace. Dall'ultimo dei suoi rapporti pubblicati, \u00e8 stato rivelato che The Nation, la rivista che ha pubblicato l'intervista, ha poste in evidenza le sue idee in un articolo. La rivista ha riferito che King ha parlato delle questioni che affliggono il paese, e ha sottolineato la necessit\u00e0 di un cambiamento radicale per affrontare i problemi sociali.\n\nLa brutalit\u00e0 politica con la consapevolezza, o nel migliore dei casi, tra l'indifferenza della comunit\u00e0, \u00e8 una esperienza quotidiana dei negri in troppe zone del Sud. I negri vivono in uno stato di polizia che, paradossalmente, prospera in senso a una repubblica democratica. In tale situazione, un'occasione di denuncia del governo federale, seguita da un processo che si trasforma in un'oppressione eccessiva. Non si rende conto, infine, che quel tipo di comportamento, da parte della polizia, \u00e8 abituale e non eccezionale.\n\nLa brutalit\u00e0 politica con la consapevolezza, o nel migliore dei casi, tra l'indifferenza della comunit\u00e0, \u00e8 una esperienza quotidiana dei negri in troppe zone del Sud. I negri vivono in uno stato di polizia che, paradossalmente, prospera in senso a una repubblica democratica. In tale situazione, un'occasione di denuncia del governo federale, seguita da un processo che si trasforma in un'oppressione eccessiva. Non si rende conto, infine, che quel tipo di comportamento, da parte della polizia, \u00e8 abituale e non eccezionale.\n\nMolti si domandano come mai le dimostrazioni e le lotte nel Sud ten-\n| FROM | TO | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------|----|------|--------------------|----------|\n| BID/DEP | WE/Supt | 29 OCT 1964 | | |\n| | | | | |\n| WE/14 | 29 OCT 1964 | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| C/WE/4/RE | 2 NOV 1964 | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| C/WE/4/CE | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| WE/4/CE/RE | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| C/OPS/WE | 6 6 66 | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| WE/14/CE | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| RTB | | | | |\n\n**NOTES:**\n- 5-6: We should investigate FBI wanting to know more about the contact of these reported meetings. It could make a world of difference in the investigation.\n- Dept. in attached Oct. 67, being forwarded to FBI in CEC.\n- 316/2051-67.\n- Drafted 6/20/61.\nFor Your Information.\n\n1. Following is a translation of a report on the subject: \"The Mission of Luther KING with the Italian Left\", dated 28 September 1964 and attributed to DEPLENARY/7, from Luigi PINTOR, from information coming into the editorial offices of L'UNITA. The Station received the report on 1 October 1964.\n\n\"Luther KING, noted Protestant negro Pastor and 'leader' of the anti-racist movement in the United States, met with various leaders of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) and of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) on 18 September in Rome. In particular, KING conferred with PCI Senators Velo SPANO and Ugo BARTESAGHI, with PSI Deputy Lucio LUZZATO, and with Senator Paolo VITTORELLI of the Italian Socialist Party of Proletarian Unity. KING discussed with the above-named politicians the program of demonstrations against segregation in the United States, which are to be organized in Italy during the months immediately ahead.\"\n\n2. The same report was also received from DEDICATOR/4 who has access to the DEPLENARY establishment and thus it is not considered as confirming the DEPLENARY/7 information.\n\n(Continued)\n\nAttachment: h/w.\nCopy of a report passed to local ODENVY rep.\n\nDistribution:\n3-C/WE, w/att.\n3. Given the source of the above report, we view it with some reserve. In this connection, we noted the 19 September issue of L'UNITA, which reflected an article on KING's private audience with Pope Paul held the preceding day. According to L'UNITA, immediately after the audience, in St. Peter's Square, KING stated that \"Pope Paul was most clear on the fact that both he, personally, and the Catholic Church support the cause of civil rights\". The article also states that in a press conference held at Fiumicino Airport after the audience KING said, \"The Pope will shortly make a public statement on racial segregation\". We have no other information at this time.\n\n4. Attached is a copy of the report which we have passed to the local ODENVY representative.\n\nRANDOLPH A. MEDBORD\nCONFIDENTIAL\nNO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION\n\nCOUNTRY: Italy/USA\n\nSUBJECT: Meeting of Dr. Martin Luther King with Italian Leftist Personalities\n\nDATE OF INFO: 28 September 1964\n\nPLACE & DATE ACQ: Italy, Rome (1 October 1964)\n\nFIELD REPORT NO: OIRT-06733\n\nSOURCE: An unwitting leftist-oriented journalist (P) with contacts in Italian Communist Party (PCI) circles in Rome from information that was available to editorial offices of L'Unita, the PCI daily newspaper. Reports from this source over the past few years have varied from mediocre and below in quality and in accuracy. Appraisal of Content: 3.\n\nLuther King, noted Protestant negro Pastor and \"leader\" of the anti-racist movement in the United States, met with various leaders of the Italian Communist Party (PCI) and of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) on 18 September in Rome. In particular, King conferred with PCI Senators Vello Spano and Ugo Bortesaghi, with PSI Deputy Lucio Luzzato, and with Senator Paolo Vittorelli of the Italian Socialist Party of Proletarian Unity (PSIU). King discussed with the above-named politicians the program of demonstrations against segregation in the United States, which are to be organized in Italy during the months immediately ahead.\n\nField Comment: Given the source of the above report, we view it with some reserve. In this connection, we noted the 19 September issue of L'Unita, which reflected an article on King's private audience with Pope Paul held the preceding day. According to L'Unita, immediately after the audience, in St. Peter's Square, King stated that \"Pope Paul was most clear on the fact that both he, personally and the Catholic Church support the cause of civil rights\". The article also states that in a press conference held at Fiumicino Airport after the audience King said, \"The Pope will shortly make a public statement on racial segregation\". We have no other information at this time.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\nNO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION\n\nSTATE\n\nDIA\n\nARMY\n\nNAVY\n\nAIR\n\nNSA\n\nAID\n\nOEC\n\nNote: Field distribution endorsed by\n\nTOTALS\n\nLIAISON\n\nCOORDINATING SELECTING\nLuther King, noto pastore protestante negro, \u00e8 leader del movimento antirazzista degli Stati Uniti, si \u00e8 incontrato il 18 settembre u.s. a Roma con diversi esponenti del PCI e del PSI. In modo particolare egli ha conferito con l'on Vello Spano, del PCI, l'on Ugo Bertessi, l'on Lucio Luzzatto del PSIUP e col senatore Paolo Vittorelli del PSI. Il Pastore King ha discusso con loro le manifestazioni contro il segregazionismo negli Stati Uniti, che si dovrebbero organizzare nei prossimi mesi in Italia.\nOGGETTO: La missione di Luther King presso le sinistre italiane\nVALUTAZIONE: Ottima\nFONTE: Attendibile/UU\n\nLuther King, noto pastore protestante negro, \u00e8 \"leader\" del movimento antirazzista degli Stati Uniti, si \u00e8 incontrato il 8 settembre u.s. a Roma con diversi esponenti del P.C.I. e del P.S.I.\n\nIn modo particolare il King ha conferito con il Sen. Vincenzo Spano, della vice presidenza della Commissione Centrale di Controllo del P.C.I., con l'On. Ugo Bartesaghi (P.C.I.), con l'On. Lucio M. Luzzatto del P.S.I.U.P. e con il Sen. Paolo Vittorelli del P.S.I.\n\nIl pastore King ha discusso con i predetti uomini politici il programma di manifestazioni contro il segregazionismo negli Stati Uniti, che si dovrebbero organizzare nei prossimi mesi in Italia.\n\nRiferita da Luigi Pintor. Notizie affluite alla redazione de \"l'Unit\u00e0\".", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10173-10166.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 48, "total-input-tokens": 54864, "total-output-tokens": 17670, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 662, 1], [662, 1152, 2], [1152, 2532, 3], [2532, 3632, 4], [3632, 4320, 5], [4320, 5796, 6], [5796, 7546, 7], [7546, 7638, 8], [7638, 8927, 9], [8927, 10403, 10], [10403, 12251, 11], [12251, 14132, 12], [14132, 16056, 13], [16056, 17433, 14], [17433, 18682, 15], [18682, 19771, 16], [19771, 21239, 17], [21239, 23011, 18], [23011, 24250, 19], [24250, 28343, 20], [28343, 29474, 21], [29474, 31315, 22], [31315, 31840, 23], [31840, 31840, 24], [31840, 32259, 25], [32259, 32501, 26], [32501, 32834, 27], [32834, 33806, 28], [33806, 33932, 29], [33932, 34529, 30], [34529, 34529, 31], [34529, 34621, 32], [34621, 34859, 33], [34859, 35871, 34], [35871, 36229, 35], [36229, 36625, 36], [36625, 38028, 37], [38028, 38472, 38], [38472, 39048, 39], [39048, 40962, 40], [40962, 42057, 41], [42057, 44508, 42], [44508, 45175, 43], [45175, 46402, 44], [46402, 47184, 45], [47184, 49253, 46], [49253, 49756, 47], [49756, 50585, 48]]}}
{"id": "f82c35afbe76bc9c33e57d0d3ba33f4419c9e89a", "text": "SECRET\n\nTo: Chief, MID\nFrom: Chief of Station, Havana\n\nSUBJECT: Commercial Matters\n\nEnclosure: Lienal Guillermo SOTO Prieto\n\n1. When Subject was arrested on 21 September 1957, a number of scraps of paper containing incomplete notes were found in his possession. The following names were legible:\n\n   Eduardo GARCIA, Av. 23 between Calles 16 and 17, Vedado.\n   No previous record in Station files.\n\n   [Dr. Salvador] MANSO, Avenida 9 No. 802, Tel. 89-1388.\n   Files show him to be a professor at the University of Havana and father of Salvador MANSO Valdes who has a long record of Communist activities.\n\n   Angelito MANSO, Calle 20 No. 272-2, Tel. 7-1388.\n   Files show him to be a member of the Communist Party, currently active in cultural organizations.\n\n   Agusto GARCIA, Calle 165, Apt. 12-bajo. No previous file record.\n\n   Gilberto LEON, Calle 165, Apt. 12-bajo. No previous file record.\n\n   Gilberto LEON, Calle 165, Apt. 12-bajo. No previous file record.\n\n   R. D. CALDERON, Calle 16, Casa 16.\n   This person may be associated with the Cuban Communist Party, with whom he was active in 1955. He was a member of the National Executive Committee of the Party and the International Committee of the Party.\n\n   Lienal Guillermo SOTO PRIETO, Calle A y 14, Regla.\n   No previous record in files.\nSECRET\n\nOtto FUCHS, Calle Estralla 209, Havana.\n\nFiles reflect that he was a Communist sympathizer at the University of Havana during 1953. He was a member of the Committee for the Defense of Guatemala in 1954.\n\nKarel VICK, Calle F No. 105 y Lino, Havana.\n\nHe is a leader of the youth section of the Communist Party.\n\nAn unconfirmed report dated 15 May 1954 from a reliable source stated that LESNICK is a Communist sympathizer and a very good friend of Lionel SOTO. In a recent interview in connection with his application for a U.S. visa, LESNICK admitted knowing SOTO but said he did not share SOTO's views.\n\nBaldemar de RIOS, Calle Santria 52, Tel. 2-205 (Havana).\n\nRios's notes contained the name Baldemar de RIOS and directly beneath it in parenthesis the name \"Guerra.\" RIOS was a Puerto Rican student at the University of Havana. He was anti-Communist but claimed to be anti-Communist. \"Guerra\" is unidentified.\n\nMarquesa de TITIMA, Tel. 2-1177; Calle F No. 160, apt. 17 y 19, Vedado, Havana.\n\nThe Marquesa de TITIMA is not identifiable from station files. Her husband, the Marquesa de TITIMA, was a Spanish monarchist who is believed to have died in 1953.\n\nDr. Luis PAVEL, Barrio Yumby, Calle Narciso Lopez 70.\n\nNo pertinent information in files.\n\nGetah VENTURA, Sligo, Tel. U-3169 and W-3169.\n\nWife of Lionel SOTO. In 1953, she was vice-president of \"Nacional,\" a Communist-front cultural organization.\n\nCarmen VENTURA, Calle Valles 103, 2nd floor; her girl friend (name unknown) lives at Calle 103, Francisco 102, 2nd floor.\n\nIn 1955, VENTURA was a law student at the University of Havana and attended the Communist Party's congress in Feb. 1955. She returned to Cuba and became active in several organizations.\n\nDr. Alberto LEIVA, Calle Campanario 306, Tel. 4-865.\n\nNo previous record.\n\nLeila LEIVA, Tel. U-356.\n\nShe is a printer and was active in 1953 in Pro-Peace Movement in Cuba.\nSECRET\n\n27 November 1957\n\nManuel (no last name given), Tol. 7-0-1508 (Alicia Alonso Ballet School).\n\nUnidentified.\n\nSantiago CUBAS, Calle Lemparilla 65, Havana.\n\nNo previous record.\n\nRene AVILLES (Capote), Calle 3 y 25, apt. 21, Havana.\n\nFiles show that in 1956 he was a student at the University of Havana and President of the Student Federation (School of Law). At the same time he was known as a leader of the Youth Group of the Ortodox Party.\n\nDr. Alejandro GONZALEZ, Clinica Koteu, Calle Concepcion y 8th, Vibora, Havana.\n\nNo previous record.\n\nRigoberto LOPEZ, Publicidad Siboney, Calle 26 No. 1004, 2nd Floor, Kelly, Havana.\n\nMember of executive council of Nuestro Tiempo, USA.\n\n2. The following addresses are located outside of Cuba:\n\nLa A. Research Bureau\n199 Broadway, New York City.\n\n(Raf: THU-1610, 26 May 1952) Reported to have mailed publication to Anibal ESCALERA, PSP representative in Cuban Congress in 1952. Publication was described as anti-U.S. and supporting Communist line.\n\nVOSSEL\n259 East 57th Street\nBrooklyn 3, New York\n\nNo record.\n\nMaria Teresa GARCIA\nP.O. Box 125\nColonia Sta. Maria\nMexico, D. F.\n\nFiles show a Maria Teresa GARCIA as member in Havana of National Council for Defense of Infantry in December 1952.\n\nAndres ESCALERA\nMorelia 59, Dep. II\nMexico, D. F.\n\nNo previous file record.\nSECRET\n\n27 November 1957\n\nGraciela AYALA\nIsabel La Catalina 207\nMexico, D. F.\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nAlice AYALA\n15 of September 110\nMexico, D. F.\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nB. V. P. C.\nA Condens Eight Street\nLondon IV 1\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nJ. VENGER\n61 Rue de Courche\nParis\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nLeo LARRO\n60 Rue d'Argent\nParis II\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nJ. REVIS or RIVER\n15 Rue Pierre - Julio\nArgenteuil (So. France)\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nRafael MARES\nCasilla 1192\nQuito\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nAndres GILBERT\nDr. Luis ELEZAR\nB. A.\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nJulia ALVAREZ\nRua Duque de Saldanha No. 117\nPorto\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nCarlos ALVAREZ\n150 Varas al norte de Hotel\nHavana\n\nPossibly identical with pro-\nCommunist Guatemalan newspaper\nnamed Carlos ALVAREZ Jarvis.\n\nCartago, G. R.\n\nAgosto COMIS (or COMIS)\nPlaza Marconi 19\nR (para breve en Ranco)\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nBendito ALVAREZ\nPlaza Barza Vista 2 - 312\n(no city name)\n\nNo previous file record.\n\nEstela LOPEZ\nPortugal 116\nSantiago\n\nNo previous file record.\nSECRET\n\nThere were numerous telephone numbers with no indication to whom they belonged. AMICUS traced the numbers, but only the following were of persons with Communist connections. (Telephone numbers are not conclusive in view of the custom in Cuba to sell the telephone and number to anyone willing to pay the price. The buyer may have no other relationship to the previous owner of the phone.)\n\nA-5-8763\nRosario JIM\u00c9NEZ de la Cueva\nCalle Aguila No. 10, bajo\nesq. San Mart\u00edn y San Rafael\nHabana\n\nShe is the mother of Antonio EUSEBIO Jim\u00e9nez, who was a friend of SOTO's when they were both students at the University of Habana. He is now in Santa Clara, Cuba.\n\nA-5-8752\nHerm\u00ednio Mar\u00eda FELIPE Daza\nand Herm\u00ednio Mar\u00eda FELIPE Rojo\nCalle S\u00edtio No. 229, ent. Limited y Compa\u00f1\u00eda\n\nRojo is the father of SOTO's former wife, Gloria Mar\u00eda FELIPE Daza.\nHerm\u00ednio Mar\u00eda FELIPE Daza is her brother.\n\nB-3667\nDr. Jos\u00e9 A. SOTO Lizarus, M. D.\nAvenida 17 No. 3001, ent. 34 y 36\nHabana, Habana\n\nNo previous record.\n\nF-3136\nSalvador L. PINTO\nCalle 9 No. 302, 2do. a 15\nYedado, Habana\n\nPossibly identical with a former consul of the Dutch Consulate in Habana. He is travelling outside of Cuba at present but will return in a month or two.\n\nE-4572\nJavier FELIPE PINTO\nCalle 6, Secci\u00f3n 116, ent. 2 y 3\nVibora, Habana\n\nHe is the father of Amelia FELIPE PINTO (E-953), who was a member of the Communist Party in Cuba. She was arrested by SIM (1953), she admitted knowing Amelia SOTO.\n\nX-1763\nSherwin-Wilkens Company of Cuba\nCalle V No. 212, ent. L\u00ednea Habana Central y 12\nReparto Estatista\n\nIt is not known where SOTO might be calling there; however, Sherwin-Wilkens has had labor trouble with the Communists in the past.\nSECRET\n\nSOTO was sentenced to six year's imprisonment on 3 November 1957. He is confined at El Principe Prison, but should be transferred to the prison on the Zola of Pina soon.\n\n[Signature]\n\nShelby L. O'Neal\n\nDistributions:\n4 - Washington\n2 - Pina\n\n510/5cm\n25 November 1957\n\nSECRET\n\n201-55292\n| FROM: RI/AN | TO: WH/REG | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------------|------------|------|--------------------|----------|\n|            | BARTON     | 5 Nov | E/B                |          |\n| 2.         |            | 6 Nov | C                  |          |\n| 3.         |            | 6 Nov | C                  |          |\n| 4.         |            | 6 Nov | C                  |          |\n| 5.         |            | 6 Nov | C                  |          |\n| 6.         |            | 21 Nov| C                  |          |\n| 7.         |            | 25 Nov| C                  |          |\n| 8.         |            |       |                    |          |\n| 9.         |            |       |                    |          |\n| 10.        |            |       |                    |          |\n| 11.        |            |       |                    |          |\n| 12.        | RI/BD      | 27 Nov|                    |          |\n| 13.        | RI/BD      |       |                    |          |\n| 14.        | RI/FI      | 1400L |                    |          |\n\n**NOTE:** If a copy or attachments are removed from the attached document, note the location of the copy and/or attachment herein. If this RECORD COPY is to be retained in the files at the Desk, call the Central File Section for permanent loan.\n\n**RECORD COPY**\n\n**FILE TITLE:**\n\n**FILE NUMBER:**\n\n**DATE PROCESSED:** 31 Oct 52\n\n**INDEX:**\nTO: Chief, WHD\nFROM: Chief of Station, Havana\nSUBJECT: General\u2014Operational/JUKEEL\n\nReference: DIR 38896, 8 October 1957\n\nAction Required: None, information only.\n\n1. In accordance with reference, there follow details of Subject's case. Attachment A is a memorandum furnished to the local COMCIB which reviewed the derogatory information in Station files on Subject. Attachment B is a paraphrased copy of the COMCIB cable to Washington recommending a favorable decision in his non-immigrant visa case.\n\n2. By virtue of Subject's youth, his record to date, and his promising future, he was listed as a JUKEEL target in June 1957. Contact was established with him in about August 1957 as a consequence of his non-immigrant visa application, and about six meetings have been held with him since that time, ostensibly for the purpose of fully clarifying his visa status. When and if Subject obtains his visa, HQ Part I will be forwarded according to established JUKEEL procedure.\n\n3. For Headquarters information, the fabricated information mentioned in paragraph 2B of Attachment A is that reported in HMK-95L, 5 January 1955, and HMK-94L, 25 December 1954. AMTIES admitted to Humphrey I. EBERHARD on 26 August 1957 that this information was fabricated.\n\nAttachments: U/S/C\nA-Memo, Subject: (Subject of Reference) 4 pages in triplicate U/S/C\nB-COMCIB Cable No. 200, 1 page in triplicate, dated 2 October 1957 U/S/C\n\nDistribution:\n1 - Washington w/attaches U/S/C\n2 - Files w/attaches\n\n25 October 1957\n\nAFY/mn\n\nSECRET\nCLASSIFICATION\n\nRI COPY\n| TO: (Office designation, room number, and building) | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |\n|--------------------------------------------------|------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| WH 046 Bldg                                      | 12 Nov 69 | 49                |                                                                                                  |\n| 2.                                               |      |                   |                                                                                                  |\n| 3.                                               |      |                   |                                                                                                  |\n| 4.                                               |      |                   |                                                                                                  |\n| 5.                                               |      |                   |                                                                                                  |\n| 6.                                               |      |                   |                                                                                                  |\n\n**POUCH MATERIAL**\n\n**SEPARATE COVER ENCLOSURE**\n\n**EXPEDITE**\n\n781-21925-2\nThe following information is furnished as of interest to you in determining Subject's security status:\n\n1. A report from an official source described as reliable, dated 20 December 1951, and evaluated as possibly true, stated that groups from the Ortodoxo party led by Subject reportedly collaborated with the Partido Socialista Popular in the planning of the protest against the Cuban Government's plans to build the \"Old Cut\" canal. The report went on to state that on 11 December 1951, the Cuban press published an article concerning a call made by Subject in the name of the national executive committee of the Ortodoxo Youth to all youth organizations, including the Juventud Socialista (JS, Cuban Communist youth organization), and other organized centers of public opinion to attend a meeting at radio station C.O.R. on 10 December 1951 in order to join in the protest. Approximately 25 persons were reported to have answered the call, of whom 15 were described as Communists and the remainder as Ortodoxos many of whom had had close ties with the Communists in the past.\n\n2. Several subsequent investigations failed to confirm that there was any collaboration between the JSF and other opposition groups in the protest against the Canal Via Cuba. All indications were that the Ortodoxo opposition groups made the protest to attack the Government and thus found themselves in conflict with the Communists, a favorite target of the Government. Subject's version of the incident was that only one Communist, Naim VALDES, spoke up at the meeting and was promptly asked by Subject to leave, which he did.\n\n3. Another report from the source mentioned in paragraph 1, dated 5 January 1952 and evaluated as possibly true, stated that a meeting between certain Ortodoxo leaders and the JSF had been concluded for the purpose of coordinating the latest protests. Subject, Mario RIVADILLO, both Ortodoxo youth leaders, Francisco L. V. Ordonez, Jose VENEZUELA, FIDU president, Anselmo FIALLO, Catholic youth member and JSF follower, and Carlos Rafael RODRIGUEZ and Ignacio GARCIA Suarez, both Communists, were said to have attended one of the meetings leading up to this act. Anti-Fidel propaganda issued by the \"Frente Obrero Ortodoxo Comunista\" was said to have been found on the person of an Ortodoxo leader from Oriente Province detained by SM on 3 January 1952.\n2. On 28 August 1957, a source within SIM, considered usually reliable, when queried concerning the reports from official sources of Orthodox-Communist collaboration and specifically concerning the part with the Communists involving Dajabon and others mentioned in paragraphs 1A above, said that these reports were false (repeated) and had been fabricated to denigrate the more active and vocal opponents of the Batista regime. Subject denied that the Orthodox ever cooperated with the Communists. He claimed that he has never met Carlos Rafael RUIZ (Dajabon) or, for that matter, any of the key Communist leaders except Lazaro FELIX, who was once painted not to his liking in Havana City.\n\n3. A. An unverified report dated 16 July 1957 from a source whose reliability was described as fair stated that Max LEBEDEV is a Communist sympathizer and a very good friend of Lionel FIDEL, editor of Vanguardia Cubana and Communist leader in the University of Havana. The report concerned LEBEDEV's candidacy for the office of Secretary General of the University of Havana.\n\nB. Subject, when asked if he knew Lionel FIDEL, said that he knew him but that he did not share his views. It is noted that the same report mentioned that it was very doubtful if the University of Havana was going to send a delegation to the Youth Congress (Communists) in Berlin, a statement hard to reconcile with the presence of a Communist sympathizer as a candidate for Secretary General of that organization.\n\n4. A. An article in Arg of 27 September 1957 reported a protest against a SIM raid on the Casa de la Cultura. Included in the list of persons signing the protest were names of many prominent Communists as well as that of Subject.\n\nB. Subject admitted signing this protest and stated for the record that he signed in good faith as an anti-Franquist and not as a Communist sympathizer.\n\n5. A. An article in Prensa Libre of 12 March 1958 reported declarations of the Cuban Committee for Guatemala against the aggression against that country. Subject's name was listed among the signers of the declaration as a member of the Committee.\n\nB. Subject stated that he signed the declaration in the sincere belief that Guatemala was a democratic country and that democratic forces had to defend that country against forces which would maintain it in economic subjection and political backwardness. He added that many non-Communists of like belief also signed the declaration. He added that when ARBEX went behind the Iron Curtain it became clear that Guatemala really had been in danger of becoming a Communist beachhead.\n6. A. An article in Hoy of 28 January 1953 reported that Subject was a member of the Juventud Ortodoxa of the presidency of the Congreso Martiano por los Derechos de la Juventud and published a photograph showing Subject at the speakers' table. Another article in Hoy of 3 March 1953 reported that Subject and several other youth leaders appeared at Hoy offices with a declaration signed by the Consejo Permanente of the Congreso Martiano. The Congreso was described as Communist-dominated by the author of the memorandum to the Visa Section dated 9 November 1955.\n\nB. Subject described the Congreso as an opposition maneuver against the Government in which many Cuban youth institutions participated, including the Communists. He said that he, himself, participated in the Congreso strictly as a representative of the Juventud Ortodoxa in opposition to the Government and in no sense as a collaborator or sympathizer with the Communists. Regarding the visit to Hoy offices, Subject said that the group in question visited many newspaper offices, not just that of Hoy.\n\n7. Subject prefaced his remarks by stating that he had recognized the Communist danger as early as 1950. He brought several documents purporting to show his attacks on Communism. The documents are attached, and pertinent extracts therefrom are set forth below in translation. Subject requested that the documents be returned when need for them no longer existed.\n\nA. Extracts from \"El Pensamiento Politico e Ideologico De La Juventud Cubana,\" dated 1 July 1950, signed by Max LEMUS, Presidente, Jose CRUZ, Vice-Presidente, Salvador LOPEZ, Oscar BORRAS, Jose SALAZAR and Josefa SALOMON.\n\n(1) (page 13, criticizing BATISTA's collaboration with the Communists) \"Around the middle of 1937, the Communist Party, alleging as a public pretext that BATISTA has ceased to be the center of the most reactionary forces not only in returning to legality but also in landing to the regime in power all its political backing and is mobilizing the working masses in his support.\"\n\n(2) (page 14, more criticism of BATISTA and his collaboration with the Communists) \"The first general elections held following the promulgation of the new Constitution, to which BATISTA went as presidential candidate of the old political forces and of the Communist Party, served only to 'civilise' in its exterior aspects the power which that man had been exercising over the country for more than five years....\"\n\n*AN EXAMINATION OF THE PHOTOGRAPH DOES NOT SHOW SUBJECT.\nTHE STATEMENT HE ATTENDED WAS DENIED AS FALSE BY SUBJECT.\n(3) (page 15, analyzing Communist Party tactics of the time) \"The Communist Party, whilst a short time before under the German-Russian pact had unleashed an active campaign for Cuban neutrality 'in the face of a war of imperialism', but which later, following the Nazi attack on Russia, was defending the most active belligerency of Cuba in the struggle 'to defend the Axis', converted itself into the strongest proponent of 'national unity'....\"\n\n(4) (page 33, summarizing political sentiments), \"These democratic convictions mean that we are radically opposed to the 'totalitarianism' that is the most outstanding characteristic of the regime imposed by Stalin in Russia.\"\n\n(5) (page 35, clarifying his anti-imperialist stand), \"On the other hand it is fitting to clarify that we shall not adjust the anti-imperialist stand of the Cuban revolutionary movement to suit the foreign policy of any country, as is the manner of procedure of the Communist Parties closely linked to Russia and its current government.\"\n\nA. A copy of an undated, unidentified newspaper clipping reported an act of the Avantguard Oratorio in honor of Julio Antonio Mella, in rebuttal to Communist attempts to identify Mella as a Communist, and specifically in reply to an article by Juan Manuel entitled \"Mella Es Nuestro.\" A picture of Subject speaking at this act is attached.\n\nB. An extract from the article \"Cuba Frente Al Osmal\" by Subject, published in Havana of 15 January 1955, page 45, in which he accuses the Government of being Communist: \"The arbitrary violation of University autonomy, the repeated coercion of the Judicial Power, the subjection of the Tribunal de Guant\u00e1n and other similar acts, characterized the conduct of the Government in the first three years of its government....\"\n\nAndrew F. Morton\n\nDistribution:\n1 - Visa Section\n2 - Files\n\n29 August 1957\nAFM/afm\nSECRET\n\nATTACHMENT B\nSeparate Cover Attachment to HKH-A-1002\n31 October 1957\n\nCABLE WIRGON 200, 2 October 1957\n\n1. Subject is Max LESNICK y Menendez, non-immigrant visa applicant born 8 September 1930 in Vuelta, Las Villas, Cuba. Profession, salesman. President of Juventud Ortodoxa and Orthodox party leader in opposition to BATISTA. He is currently in hiding from police until the heat is off. In 1954, he signed the Comite Cubano declaration in favor of Guatemala. He was referred to as a Communist sympathizer through collaboration between Ortodoxos and Communists and friendship with known Cuban Communists possibly embracing Section 212 (a) (27) and (25).\n\n2. Security checks show no indications of collaboration with Communists. Latter at times tried to get on the bandwagon of all opposition groups including the Ortodoxos. Specific information from Cuban Government sources regarding Ortodoxo-Communist pacts were later admitted to the local CAS as fabrications. LESNICK states that he signed the Pro-Guatemala declaration against big foreign business domination of Latin American affairs as did many other Cubans. He states that he is only acquainted with student Communist leaders at the University of Havana. He denies that he collaborated with the Communists during the past or present and brings published articles dating back to 1950 which indicate his anti-Communist stand. His name appears in the Soundex for questioning.\n\n3. The local CAS is especially interested in the case. A favorable decision is recommended by the visa officers.\n\n4. LESNICK plans attend Inter-American Press Association meeting to be held 12 October in Washington, entering New York 12 October at 1135 p.m. via Cubana airline.\nTO: The Secretary of State  \nAttention: Mr. E. Toomin Bailey  \nDirector, Office of Security  \n\nFROM: Deputy Director, Plans  \n\nSUBJECT: LESNICK y MENENDEZ, Max  \n\n1. Reference is made to your ST memorandum 67/76, dated 7 October 1957, subject as above, whose name you desired checked against the files of this office. The files contain information concerning Max LESNICK which has been already disseminated to the Department of State as indicated below:\n\n   a. CSB 18971 dated 8 April 1954, subject: Character Assassination of Dr. Ramiro AREANO Alainas.\n\n   b. CS 53861 dated 17 March 1955, subject: Communist Influence in the PCE Habana University.\n\n   c. CS 77501 dated 7 November 1955, subject: Status of the Political Opposition.\n\n   d. CS 87250 dated 14 March 1956, subject: Activities and Plans of Cuban Revolutionaries.\n\n   e. CS 3,118,636 dated 11 June 1957, subject: Political Opinions of Rafael GARCIA Barcena, Opposition Leader.\n\n2. In addition, you are referred to the following Department of State despatches:\n\n   a. Despatch L86, dated 22 June 1949, from Habana, Cuba, subject: Proposed Cuban National Congress for Peace and Democracy.\nb. Despatch 100, dated 23 July 1954, from Havana, Cuba, subjects: Organized Individuals in Cuba that identified themselves with Arbenz Administration.\n\nc. Despatch 1232, dated 28 January 1952, from Havana, Cuba, subjects: New National Executive Committee of Partido Del Pueblo Cubano (Gritojazo).\n**REQUEST FOR SECURITY INFORMATION**\n\n**To:** DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANS (CIA)  \n**From:**  \n**Date:** 10/4/57\n\n**NAME:** Max Leshnick y Menendez  \n**DATE OF BIRTH:** Sept. 8, 1920  \n**PLACE OF BIRTH:** Huelva, Las Villas, Cuba\n\n**SEX:** M  \n**MARITAL STATUS:** Single  \n**CITIZENSHIP:** Cuban\n\n**ADDRESS:** Cuba  \n**OCCUPATION AND NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER:** President Juventud Ortodoxa, and Orthodox Party leader.\n\n**ADDITIONAL IDENTIFYING DATA:**\n\n**DIVISION OR AGENCY:** VISA OFFICE - Security Branch  \n**REASON FOR REQUEST, OR TYPE OF PROGRAM:** VISA - Security Case  \n**URGENT:** To attend inter-American press association, October 12, 1957, Washington, D.C., via New York.\n\n**NAME OR REQUESTING OFFICER:**  \n**DATE:** 10/4/57\n\n**RESULTS OF THIS REQUEST FOR SECURITY INFORMATION:**\n\n- [ ] NO RECORD  \n- [ ] SECURITY INFORMATION ATTACHED  \n- [ ] NO DEROGATORY INFORMATION  \n- [ ] OTHER (Use reverse only for reporting)\n\n**CHECKED BY:**  \n**DATE:**  \n\n**FOR USE OF DIVISION OF SECURITY:**\n\n**VISA OFFICE SECURITY ENCLAVE**\n\n**DEPT. OF STATE**\n\n**Encl-1**  \n**RI COPY**\n\n**V/00765022**\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: HAVANA\nACTION: WH 5\nINFO: CI, CI/OPS, FI, FI/OPS, FLRI 2, S/C 2\n\nLESNICK - ATTACHMENT\n\nTO: DIR\nINFO: CITE HAVA 037\n\nREF: A. DIR 38898 (OUT 98169)\nB. HKHA 3653\n\nSUBJ PROMINENT ORTHODOX YOUTH LEADER, JMREEL CONTACT (SEE REF B) PAST TWO MONTHS. FURNISHED DOC INFO PROVE ANTI-COMMIE STAND. STATION REVIEWED DEROG INFO PER ODACID CABLE 200, CLEARED SATISFACTION CONSULAR OFFICER HANDLING CASE. WILL POUCH DETAILS. URGE ODACID EXPEDITE FAVORABLE DECISION AND CLEARANCE INS IDLEWILD.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: REQUESTED CLARIFICATION STATIONS INTEREST ISSUANCE VISA TO MAX LESNICK REPORTED IN ODACID CABLE NO. 200 2 OCT.\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No.\n| FROM | TO | ROOM NO | DATE | OTHERS | INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------|----|---------|------|--------|----------|----------|\n| RI/FI | Cubalco | 20 | 6/24/57 | 6/24/57 | Cubalco | COPY DETACHED |\n\n**NOTE:** A copy or attachment is removed from the attached document, and the blank of the copy and or attachment is to be returned to the file in the file section for permanent loss.\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nFrom: [Redacted]\n\nReport No: [Redacted]\n\nLocal File No: [Redacted]\n\nNo. of Pages: 2\n\nNo. of Enclosures: None\n\nApproved By: [Redacted]\n\nDistribution: 1 - Wash w/mat\n\nBy copy to: 1 - Santiago de Cuba\n\n2 - Embassy, Local Attach\u00e9\n\n2 - Files\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nSUBJECT: Mario Daniel RIVADULLA y Casado\n\nComments: (Dr.) Jos\u00e9 Antonio RIVADULLA, Attach\u00e9, arranged an introduction to RIVADULLA on 8 July, and he has since been seen by Palmer on several occasions.\n\nThe 5 January 1955 report was from KNOX (HK-951); the 6 November 1955 report from ACIU (HK-27); both were appraised as 3. RIVADULLA, who was denied a visitor's visa in November, 1955, largely on the strength of these two reports from the Station, is still interested in obtaining the visa and willing to clarify his status via the J3 and J5 with the local ORICED.\n\nIt is believed this report will assist in answering that portion of the latest article requirements list, forwarded under HK-4-2379, concerning RIVADULLA.\nIn a private conversation on 8 July 1957, Mario Daniel Rivatella y Carcedo, a national leader in the youth sector of the Injured Orthodox Party, made the following comments:\n\n1. The idea of Communist penetration of the Orthodox youth organization was either a threat or a reality. The Orthodox youth organization and the Cuban Communist Youth Organization (CUCY) have existed for over 20 years. The Cuban Communist Party (PCC) and the Cuban Youth Organization (OCM) have been active in Cuba, however, all of the opposition parties and their youth sectors participated with Communist representatives in opposition meetings and shared a platform with them. This procedure on the part of the opposition parties had nothing to do with the Cuban Communist Party, but was carried on for strictly tactical purposes by each opposition group. It is a Communist practice to use without authorization the names of leaders of other opposition groups in their manifestos and declarations of their. In fact, Rivatella's name was used by the Communists in a number of occasions without his knowledge and he had recently been a guest in the press to clarify that he is not a Communist, and never has been a Communist, a sympathizer or a follower. He has been active in Orthodox Party affairs since the 1930s and believes the Communist ideology and political theory is not applicable to the Cuban situation and that it holds nothing of value for Cuban politics.\n\n2. At the time of the 1954 general elections, the combined numerical strength of the Orthodox Party youth was between 70,000 and 80,000. Since that time, however, the National Revolutionary Alliance (ARN, National Revolutionary Party) led by President Fidel Castro, and the 26th of July Movement, under the leadership of Fidel Castro, have been active in Cuba. It is a fact that the PCC group is at present numerically smaller. Rivatella will shortly return from the Orthodox youth organization and affiliate himself with the PCC. He is a great admirer of Fidel Castro who he believes has a bright political future in Cuba. In the other hand, Rivatella (with the Orthodox Party, a national leader of the Orthodox Youth Organization) has not had the opportunity to meet with the letter's appeal to Cuban youth. He appeals to Rivatella to PCC that the several important sectors of the Orthodox Party youth organization should be united.\nField Report\n\n1. Several previous reports from this office, dated 6 November 1952, and 5 January 1953, from independent sources, and whose contents were confirmed by other reports, stated that a person named Koval was involved in certain activities of the KGB and CIA on one hand, and the Orthodox youth on the other hand, whose purpose was support of KGB activities. Koval, a national leader of the Orthodox youth, was accused of being a Communist or a sympathizer of the KGB within the Orthodox youth and was expelled in the past. This office has not been able to confirm the existence of the reported facts.\n\n2. The newspaper Pravda, 13 December 1956, carries a statement by the Orthodox youth leader, in which he denies authorization to the KGB to use his name upon a document signed by Cuban Communists, that asked for guarantees for 10 of July revolution to be carried out in the Sierra Maestra and a speech by Koval. Koval, in his speech, said that while they fully support the message of the document, they refuse to join in signing it with those (i.e., the Cuban Communists) who do not take the same position for the Hungarian revolutionaries who died by the thousands in Budapest. They conclude by saying that their protest statement clarifies their support of guarantees for the 20 of July revolution, their desire for a just solution to Cuba's political problem, and their sentiments against those (i.e., the Cuban Communists) who still have not satisfactorily explained the Soviet crime committed in Hungary.\n\n3. The newspaper Pravda, 30 April 1957, and Pravda, 5 May 1957, contain a statement by the leader of the Orthodox youth, in which he says that during a recent interview, several persons became involved in a discussion in matters made by a member of the Anti-Communist Party, as being accused as Communists by the KGB. The leader of the Orthodox youth, a participant in the round-table, replied that he didn't know about the others mentioned, but he did not believe Koval was a Communist, but would investigate the matter. After ridiculing Koval in the role of private detective, Koval says that he doesn't have to reiterate his anti-Communist convictions or his anti-KGB record, nor repeat that he is not, nor has ever been, a Communist or anything else. He concludes by challenging Koval to find any Communist antecedent in his records.\n\n4. Koval announced his new KGB affiliation in the local press during the last week of July 1957.\nNecro\n\nProfessional and Businessmen\n\nAntonio M. de la Cruz\nLuis M. de la Cruz\nAntonio M. de la Cruz\n\nLawyer\nEconomic counselor, investment broker\nBusinessman, works with Hodges textile interests\n\nPoliticians\n\nNicol\u00e1s Trujillo\nJos\u00e9 P. de la Cruz\nAnselmo Trujillo\nAndr\u00e9s Trujillo\nEugenio Trujillo Navarro\nDiego Trujillo Navarro\n\nFidel (A) leader in Matanzas Province\nAge: 40\n\nDistribution\n3 - Washington\n2 - Miami\n\n6 June 1957\nMiami\n1. LOCAL COMMIE: ST. JOSE RASSIP YSALQUE, SOCIEDAD CULTURAL NUESTRO TIEMPO, CALLE 23 NO 965, VEDADO, HAVANA.\n\n2. LOCAL YOUTH ADDRESSEES ALL IN HAVANA: EL PRESIDENTE, SECCION JUVENIL, PARTIDO DE PUEBLO CUBANO, PLAZA DE MARTI NO 109. EL PRESIDENTE, FEDERACION ESTUDIANTIL UNIVERSITARIA, UNIVERSIDAD DE LA HABANA. EL PRESIDENTE, SECCION JUVENIL, PARTIDO NACIONALISTA REVOLUCIONARIA, SR. JOSE PARDO LLADA, RADIO COCO, AVENIDA 8 ESQ. YVAR 314. SR. EDUARDO CORRELL NAVARRO, SUBSECRETARIO DE EDUCACION, MINISTERIO DE EDUCACION, OFICIOS Y MURALLA. SR. MANUEL GONZALEZ, DIARIO NACIONAL, CONSULADO 252. SR. ULISES CARDO, PRENSA LIBRE, MANRIQUE 653. SR. LUIS ORTEGA ORTEGA, CAMARA DE REPRESENTANTES, CONGRESO NACIONAL. (SR.) RODOLFO NIEVES, DIRECTOR \"JUVENTUD OBRERA\", 19 NO 466, VEDADO. (SR.) FRANCISCO ROJAS CHAVEZ, COYUNTURA JUVENIL DE LA CTC, AVENIDA EL NO 1419, LARIAMAR. CONTENT: MAIL SENT FROM IRRON COUNTRY. MAY BE INTERCEPTED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nIT IS FORBIDDEN TO MAKE A COPY OF THIS MESSAGE\n\n19-4-1971\n10 May 57\n\nDistribution: 1 = Washington (1 to EOD)\n\nBy copy to: 1 = Secretary, Local Attach\u00e9\n2 = Files\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comment:\n\n[Handwritten text]\n\nClassification: SECRET\nSECRET\n\nFIELD INFORMATION REPORT\n\nCOUNTRY: Cuba\n\nSUBJECT: Felino Antonio Cecilio\n\nREPORT NO.: 651-1162\n\nDATE OF INFO: 27 April 1957\n\nDATE ACQUIRED: 2 May 1957\n\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Havana\n\nDATE OF REPORT: 10 May 1957\n\nSOURCE, SOURCE EVALUATION, APPRAISAL OF CONTENT: Cuban government official with contacts in Cuban security agencies (2). Appraisal of Content: 2.\n\n1. On orders from Col. Comrade CAPITANA Ugalde, Chief of the Direction Department of the Cuban National Police, Subject was arrested on 27 April 1957 and confined in the 11th Precinct Station in Havana. At the time of his arrest, Subject had in his possession copies of Fundamento del Poder, Cuba and the Communist Manifesto, both in Spanish, and copies of the Cuban Communist Party's newspaper, Marte and Fidelidad (1956), among other Communist materials. A subsequent investigation of MARTINEZ by an agent of the Fuerza para la Represion de Actividades Comunistas (FURAC, Bureau for Repression of Communist Activities) revealed the following information:\n\n2. MARTINEZ was born in Havana on 23 August 1927, his father being Cecilio MARTINEZ Gonz\u00e1lez and his mother Alicia Mart\u00ednez Correa. He resides with his parents at Calle Calzada de Manzana No. 25, ground floor, in Mantilla. He is single and a student in the final year at the Commercial Sciences School of the University of Havana. For the past year and a half he has also been employed in the Lighting Department of the Electric Sales Company, Calle Oficios 11, Havana. Subject has a sister named Carmen Mart\u00ednez Ortega, aged 32 years, married to Roberto M\u00c9NDEZ, who is employed as an electrician in the Artesana Company store, Havana. His sister is a graduate of the Normal School but is not presently working. He did not recall his sister's address.\n\nMARTINEZ stated that both he and his parents are registered in the Central Havana Municipal Electoral Juntas; he is a member of the Orthodox Party and his father a Liberal Party member. He was a member of the Catholic Youth (Juventud Cat\u00f3lica) from 1943 until 1951. He declared that on several occasions, FURAC agents had approached him to join the Cuban Communist Youth Organization but that he had not done so.\n\n3. Under interrogation, MARTINEZ said he was not a member of the Cuban Communist Party but sympathized with Communist doctrine. He is a member of the Centro de la Juventud (1956) and was formerly a member of the Asociaci\u00f3n Latinoamericana Libre (ALAL, Free Latin American Association). In 1951 he was second vice-president of the Commercial Sciences Student Association at the University of Havana.\nIn 1953 he attended the Fourth World Youth Festival held in Warsaw, Poland. MARTINEZ stated he left Cuba by air for the United States, where he remained for several days visiting a number of universities; he departed from the United States for France via sea and, upon his arrival in France, took a train direct to Moscow. While attending the Festival, he was invited by members of the Chinese delegation present to visit Communist China. MARTINEZ accepted, traveling across the USSR to China, where he remained for a short period of time. He returned to Cuba via Czechoslovakia, Austria, France, and Spain. His complete trip lasted approximately six months.\n\nField Comments:\n\n1. Office files reflect that MARTINEZ was one of three Cuban delegates of the Cuban University Students' Federation to the Fifth National Student Congress of the U.S. National Student Association (NSA) held in Bloomington, Indiana, in August 1954. The Cuban delegates denounced dictatorship in general and succeeded in having the Congress pass a resolution condemning the Batista dictatorship specifically. On 3 March 1953, contains an article showing Subject active with MARTINEZ, Ra\u00fal V\u00c1ZQUEZ Vives, and Armando ALDANA, among others, in organizing a Congress Martiano por los Derechos de la Juventud. On 10 June 1954, contains an invitation to the public issued by the Pro-Cuban University Students' Committee, to attend a meeting. Subject is shown as a member of this Committee, together with student Communist V\u00c1ZQUEZ, Ra\u00fal V\u00c1ZQUEZ Vives, and Armando ALDANA, among others. A report dated 5 August 1955, from a source whose reliability had not been determined, indicated MARTINEZ was an active Cuban Communist Party leader who had traveled to Communist China and the USSR.\n\n2. V\u00c1ZQUEZ, who until recently was a prominent Communist student leader at the University of Havana, has been the subject of numerous reports in his past.\n\n3. \"Nuestro Tiempo\" is a Cuban Communist cultural front organization.\n\n4. According to office files, Subject signed a statement by the Free Latin American Association distributed in October 1954 together with Cuban Communists Col\u00e1s and Aurelio RAMIREZ Arroyo, (Dr.) Ra\u00fal V\u00c1ZQUEZ Vives, and reported organizers of the Association in a Cuban Communist-front organization.\nSECRET\n\nFrom: Havana\n\nReport No.: HUN-1677\n\nLocal File No.: 2\n\nNo. of Pages: Two\n\nNo. of Enclosures: None\n\nReport Made By: Shelby L. Overstreet\n\nApproved By: Sherwood P. Rothen\n\nDistribution:\n\nBy copy to: 1-Washington\n\nOrally to: None\n\n1-Embassy\n\n2-Files\n\nSource Cryptogram:\n\nReferences: HUN-1677, 27 March 1957\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nSubject: Views of Rafael GARCIA Barcena on Cuban Political Situation\n\nComments: OVERSTREET was interested in meeting Rafael GARCIA Barcena because of the report that Subject was instrumental in influencing the political thinking of Ramon BARTUN, former Cuban Military Attach\u00e9 in Washington, now serving a six-year term in prison for conspiracy to overthrow the Cuban Government. The introduction was made by ROYCE, a law student at the University who had known Subject when he was a professor. OVERSTREET and Subject have become friends because of their mutual friendship for BARTUN.\n\n68-3/38636\n\nFILE IN 201-299258\n\nSECRET\n\nNI COPY\n\n19-9-5-7\nSECRET\n\nFIELD INFORMATION REPORT\n\nCOUNTRY: Cuba\n\nSUBJECT: Views of Rafael GARCIA B\u00e1rzana on Cuban Political Situation\n\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Havana\n\nSOURCE, SOURCE EVALUATION, APPRAISAL OF CONTENT:\nSource: Qualified American Observer (A) from an Opposition Political Leader (P).\n\nAppraisal of Contents:\n\n1. Rafael GARCIA B\u00e1rzana said that recently he had been in conference with Roberto GRAU Y GRAU, leader of one of the three factions of the Partido del Pueblo Cubano (Orthodox) and that he had been asked to try to bring together the three factions of the Orthodox Party: the groups of AGUAYO, ECHAVEZ, and CARLOS F\u00c1CQUEZ STERLING.\n\n2. GARCIA B\u00e1rzana would like to maneuver himself into the position of being the Orthodox candidate for President of Cuba in the 1958 elections. He said that it is too soon to attempt a reconciliation in the Party and that his own tactic is to maintain contact with all the opposition political leaders in the hope that at a propitious time he will be the one person about whom no faction would have any strong objections. Subject said there was no first-class political party in Cuba but that the Orthodox were the least objectionable and the name of the party had not been tarnished as was true of the Aut\u00e9nticos, nor was it a party of petty politicians seeking power. Of the three factions in the Orthodox, OCHOA controls the party political machinery, AGUAYO controls the exiles and revolutionary group in which youth and students are prominent, and ECHAVEZ STERLING leads only a small segment of the party. He said that the \"Orthodox Youth will not present a difficult problem within the party once they can be convinced that the way to power is not through violence but through participation in the 1958 elections. The Youth are strong enough to vote a presidential candidate but probably will not take a leading part in selecting one. He did not feel that KENNEDY or FRANCISCO was a great deal of influence among the Youth at present. He said that Mart\u00ed and V\u00c1ZQUEZ was the most respected of the Youth leaders. This group eschews violent revolutionary action.\n\n3. GARC\u00cdA B\u00e1rzana pictures himself as the person who can influence the Orthodox Youth to abandon revolutionary methods, and toward this end he is writing a series of articles for such widely-read magazines as Pueblo Cubano which he points out to the Youth that times have changed since he (GARC\u00cdA B\u00e1rzana) led the Youth in the assault on Casa Columbia. He said that his complete reversal of policy is going to cost Cuban youth, but he feels it is the only way to bring unity to the party and prepare for the elections of 1958. He fears that May will be a month of increased violence in Havana; but, once the revolutionaries realize that they have\nnot accomplished anything, they will be more amenable to suggestions to prepare for the elections in 1953.\n\n4. GARCIA B\u00e1rzana feels that the Ortodoxo Party has only about a 25 per cent chance of winning a Presidential election -- not because it could not command enough votes, but because the current regime of terror is not likely to permit an opposition party to come into power. They have gone too far on the road to government by assassination, imprisonment, and torture to give up their power, he said. Nevertheless, in his opinion there is no alternative to an election. He feels that, even if the Ortodoxos cannot elect a President, they may elect a number of Senators and Representatives in Congress. He will propose that Ramon BARQUIN be run as a candidate for the Senate even if BARQUIN is still in prison at the time of the elections. He did not believe that there were any legal obstacles.\n\n5. Regarding Fidel CASTRO, he said that CASTRO was an impetuous and perhaps even an irresponsible leader, but one who could not be ignored in any new government because of the youth of the country he represents an ideal and for this reason no stable government could be formed without him. He said he differed with CASTRO on the matter of military principles. He does not believe that CASTRO will be able to attract any significant defections or support from the Army. He said that CASTRO originally believed that, if he could only establish a beachhead in Oriente, show strength in that area, while at the same time show the Army that he had supporters in Havana by agitating here, he would be able to find support in the Army itself, particularly in Camp Columbia. This was CASTRO's big mistake, according to GARCIA B\u00e1rzana. Since CASTRO cannot take Camp Columbia, he is isolated. GARCIA B\u00e1rzana did not believe that CASTRO was ultra-nationalistic but that apparently some of his followers were from the same group of the propaganda of the 26th of July Movement. GARCIA B\u00e1rzana, because of his previous influence among Cuban youth, apparently sees himself as the person to offset or balance the impulsiveness of CASTRO if his group ever comes to power.\n\nField Comment:\n\nRafael GARCIA B\u00e1rzana was one of the founders of the Partido del Pueblo Cubano (Orthodox) but separated from it because of differences of opinion with the leaders Roberto AGUARDE and Jose VASCO Llada. He had been a University professor and instructor of military psychology at the Cabana Fortress and at one time had considerable following among Cuban youth and many friends in the Cuban Army. In April 1953 he was sentenced to three years' imprisonment for conspiracy against the BATISTA Government but was released by amnesty in June 1954. Since then he has refrained from revolutionary activities and has been occupied with writing mildly anti-Government articles for various publications and maintaining contact with the principal leaders of the opposition parties. In a forthcoming article to appear in Havana he will exhort the youth of Cuba to give up their violent revolutionary activities and to seek power through elections in 1953.\nSECRET\n\n22 Aug 56\n\nFrom: Habana, Cuba\n\nReport No: HN-1292 Local File No:\n\nNo. of Pages: 2\n\nNo. of References:\n\nReport Made By: John A. Pellegrino\n\nInterpretation: Walter A. Grawemeyer\n\nDistribution:\n\n1 - Headquarters (1 to IED)\n\nBy copy to:\n\n1 - Havana, Cuba\n\nOrally to:\n\n2 - Files\n\nSource Credibility: See below\n\nReferences: HN-1292\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nSUBJECT: Activities of the Juventud Socialista\n\nSOURCE:\n\nPara. 1: ANONYMOUS-1\n\nPara. 2: ANONYMOUS-5\n\nPara. 3: ANONYMOUS-12\n\nClassification\n\nSECRET\n\n15-01-15\nSECRET\n\nSubject: Activities of the Juventud Socialista\n\nReport No: HEM-1332\n\nDate of Information: 7 July - 13 August 1956\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nDate Acquired: 8 July - 14 August 1956\n\nEvaluation: Para. 1: 2\n\nPara. 2-3: Documentary\n\nSource: Para. 1: 3\n\nPara. 1: Cuban with close contacts in university student circles (2).\n\nPara. 2-3: Member of the Cuban Communist Youth Organization (3).\n\nPara. 4: Person close to Communist University students (4).\n\n1. On 6 August 1956 Antonio MACEO Ferrer, student Communist leader, was seen at the University of Havana distributing a flyer-sheet of the Juventud Socialista (JS, Cuban Communist Youth Organization) titled \"Path of Cuban Youth.\" He had a bundle of approximately 500 copies of this document. On 19 August, MACEO and IRENE, student Communists, also distributed a similar leaflet of the JS official JS bi-weekly publication, at the University.\n\n2. The above flyer-sheet also appeared as a page insert in the 1 August issue of \"Habana,\" the official organ of the JS. The flyer-sheet consists of a letter, dated 2 August 1956 at Havana, from the JS National Executive Committee to Cuban youth. After setting out the Cuban Communist line against partial elections and for revolutionary action on 12 August against the BACIJA Government, the letter states: the Executive Committee has decided to appeal to the national leadership of all opposition youth organizations and other \"institutions of the new generation\" to join in immediate acts of protest against that Government. The letter states the Committee has approved a new letter to Cuban working people and student youth, which will shortly be circulated. A portion is dated 10 July by the Communist Party Youth in their meeting hall in that city. Among others, it is said, leaders of the following groups attended:\n\n- Communist Party Youth\n- Authentic Party Youth (both CNAU and PNO sections)\n- Juventud Socialista\n- National Federation of Secondary School Students\n- Student Federation of Havana\n- Nationalist Revolutionary Party Youth\n\nClassification\n26 of July Movement Youth\nCertain working youth\n\n3. The letter lists the following agreements arrived at at this meeting:\n\n1) Publish a manifesto denouncing partial elections and calling for mass action against the UNPAC Government.\n\n2) Name a youth commission to contact leaders of each political party demanding that they repudiate partial elections.\n\n3) Send a letter to the Federaci\u00f3n Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU, University Students' Federation) in Havana demanding that they declare a truce to any UNPAC member supporting partial elections.\n\n4) Create \"fighting committees\" (comit\u00e9s de lucha) in every youth center regardless of politics.\n\n5) Carry out a commemorative march on 12 August.\n\nThe letter closes by indicating that the Committee agrees wholeheartedly with the results of the 18 July meeting in Oriente Province and invites all youth groups to unite in support of the above agreements.\n\n4. Sources state that, as a result of the 18 July convention in Santiago de Cuba, the J3 is promoting a similar youth meeting for Havana.\n\nField Report, Havana Libre, 8 July 1956, published an agreement of the National Council of the Organized Youth, over the signatures of\n\nJorge L. S\u00e1nchez, Secretary/President, FEU/FEU/FEU, (Cuban Forces)\n\nand others, rejecting the proposed partial elections. Avance,\n7 July 1956, carried an article stating that several J3 leaders\nhad met and announced the J3 opposed the partial elections and would\npass judgment upon such of its members as had accepted the Government's\nelectoral plans in their present capacity of opposition party leaders.\n\nAmong such leaders were named Luis M. Garc\u00eda, new Secretary General\nof the Partido Nacionalista Revolucionario (PNR, Nationalist Revolutionary\nParty), and Emilio J. S\u00e1nchez, political chief in Oriente Province.\n\nInformation, 9 July, said in an article that the secondary school\nassociation in Santiago de Cuba had met and agreed to a united front\nagainst partial elections. J3 officials also met and participated as a\ndemonstration and it was agreed to conduct a strike march in the city on 12\nAugust. The local press of 12 August reported that J3 and 32 students\nwere arrested in Santiago on 11 - 12 August in connection with public\nmanifestations against the Government.\n| FROM | TO | RECV NO | DATE | OFFICE INITIALS | TELEPHONE | COMMENTS |\n|------|----|---------|------|----------------|-----------|----------|\n| WH   |     | 046     | 28.46|                 |           |          |\n|      | M  |         |      |                 |           |          |\n|      | M  |         |      |                 |           |          |\n|      | 27.46|        |      |                 |           |          |\n|      | 17.46|        |      |                 |           |          |\n|      | 24.46|        |      |                 |           |          |\n|      | 14.00|        |      |                 |           |          |\n\n**DISCERNED**\n\n**FILE IN 201 209258**\nSubjects: Revolutionary Activities\n\nComments:\n\n1. A copy of the letter summarized in Paragraph 1 is on file at this Station.\n\n2. The information contained in Paragraph 2 was obtained by AGIVALENT from Juan FUENTES Yero and Roberto LEON Lamas.\nSubject: Revolutionary Activities\n\nReport No: EEU-1216\n\nDate of Information: 12-13 February 1956\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana\n\nDate Acquired: 14 February 1956\n\nEvaluation:\n\nDate of Report: 14 February 1956\n\nSource:\n\nPara. 1 - Cuban Government Official (3)\n\nPara. 2 - Cuban with good contacts in opposition circles (3)\n\nfrom revolutionary plotters (1)\n\nAppraisal of Content: Para. 1 - Doc.\n\nPara. 2 - 3\n\n1. There follows a summary of a confidential letter sent on 12 February 1956 by the Chief of the Department of Direction of the Cuban National Police to the Chief of the Department of Investigation concerning revolutionary plans by Communists and oppositionists to create disturbances on 13 February, the anniversary of the death of student Rub\u00e9n BASTIDA, and on the Cuban national holiday, 24 February 1956:\n\n\"The leader appears to be Fidel CASTRO, who from abroad is directing over 20,000 youths throughout the island. Other leaders are:\n\n- EUGENIO RODRIGUEZ of the Federaci\u00f3n Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU; University Students' Federation).\n- Augusto CHAP\u00cd TRUJILLO, FEU leader, national director of the Juventud Socialista (JS, Communist Youth group), who has just been elected president by the School of Philosophy and Letters.\n- Gustavo MAR\u00cdN of the Movimiento de la Ra\u00edz, who is closely connected with the Communists of the University.\n- Oscar GONZ\u00c1LEZ.\n- Jos\u00e9 L\u00d3PEZ of the Juventud Obrera Insurreccional.\n- Dr. Antonio CORONA, long-time Marxist but pseudo-Orthodox director of insurrectional line.\n\nAs a prelude to the commemoration of the fall of student BASTIDA, they will again mobilize national opinion, this time in a united front of struggle with the sugar, port, and transportation workers, whom they say they have on their side.\n\n\"Communist and oppositionist youths are spreading defeatist rumors to the effect that the year 1956 will be tragic in national history, the political situation is very dangerous, a feeling of insecurity reigns. The Communist and oppositionist student brigades of the so-called Popular Front of Guido BARGA In\u00e1in and others are painting...\"\non the walls of houses Marxist notices such as 'Abajo BATISTA' and '126 de Julio' and waging a campaign of proselytism in favor of the so-called 'Revolutionary Emigres,' this is, the mobilization of Fidel CASTRO.\n\n2. The source of a previous report on plans for a revolutionary coup on 26 February 1956 has furnished the following additional information:\n\n\"The conspiracy is continuing to develop favorably, and there is a danger that the revolution may break out any time before 26 February.\n\nAmong the revolutionary leaders are Juan Fuentes Yero and Roberto \"Robo\" Lema. Also involved is Raul Fuentes, a Ct. who has returned to Cuba. Almost all the revolutionary leaders who were in exile are now in Cuba. It is possible that Dr. Angelito Rangel Arango may also be back here.\n\nThe meetings held at the farm of Fidel CASTRO's cousin near Cienfuegos have been attended by officers and enlisted men of the Army and the National Police. Last week important meetings were held on Thursday and Saturday, attended by Fidel CASTRO, his brother, and his sister.\n\nThe preparation for the revolution has started with the placing of bombs and petrol. The person who placed the petrol in the National Capitol last Friday was Juan Cortes.\n\nThe revolutionary plotters include in their violent plans the elimination of different persons connected with the BATISTA regime. One of the first to be eliminated is General Rafael Calixto Curbelo, Chief of the National Police, who it is expected will be eliminated by police officers connected with the conspiracy. Another possible victim is Raul Fuentes.\n\nSince 1 February a group of revolutionaries from Habana have been in Camag\u00fcey, including one man from Cienfuegos, Habana Province, who is to eliminate three persons from Camag\u00fcey. The revolutionary leader in Camag\u00fcey is Miguelito Llarena, who suffered imprisonment and torture during the dictatorship of MACHADO.\n\nGroups of revolutionaries from Habana are in all the capitals of the province, working with the local groups. The revolutionaries predict that there will be much bloodshed.\"\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nField Reports\n\n1. The confidential letter to the Cuban DI is considered to be an obvious attempt to put the major blame on Communist elements for recent anti-government demonstrations as evidenced by the reference to paintings on the walls of houses such as \"Abajo Batista\" and \"26 de Julio\" on Communist motives. Recent reports also indicate that the FID is opposed to the acceptance of Communist support in its demonstrations and refused permission to Cuban and other DI members to participate in the 10 January event honoring FID. The contents of the confidential letter are therefore evaluated as \"CUBAN\".\n\n2. No information is available to confirm the reported presence in Cuba of Ernesto Fidel Castro, Fidel Castro or Aureliano S\u00e1nchez Aybar.\nDATE: 23 NOVEMBER 1955\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nSUBJECT: CARLOS RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ\nFBI FILE NO: NONE GIVEN\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nFrom: Habana\n\nReport No.: HX-1111 Local File No.: 1\n\nNo. of Pages: 1\n\nNo. of Enclosures: None\n\nReport Date: 11-21-44\n\nApproved By: Shawood P. London\n\nDistribution:\n\nBy copy to:\n\n1 Wash.\n\nOrally to:\n\nNone\n\nFiles\n\nSource Credibility: AN/ELI\n\nReferences:\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nAN/ELI furnished the information in the attached report at our request. Although a considerable amount of it is background, it does tend to answer some of the questions raised in HX-1111 and is therefore being forwarded.\n\nAN/ELI claims that he obtained the information in the report from direct conversations with Carlos Pardo Serrano and his secretary Dr. Luis Guzman. Fernandez, Rolando Masperez, Jose Pardo Llada, Enrique Pizarro de Paredes, Chief of Publicity for the Presidential Palace; and Carlos Marquez Sterling.\nThe following report was received from an active member of the political opposition:\n\nAs a result of differences which arose between Carlos PRIO and Ra\u00fal CASTRO, Ra\u00fal CASTRO, after PRIO succeeded ORAU as President in 1948, the PRIO, as well as other groups, one headed by PRIO known as \"Organizaci\u00f3n Nacionalista de la Juventud\" and another known as \"Antifascistas Nacionales\", after the break between PRIO and ORAU, ORAU endeavored to form the \"Partido de la Unidad\" to enter the 1952 elections. However, with CASTRO's coup d'\u00e9tat on 10 March 1952 and PRIO's exile in the U.S., ORAU remained in Cuba speaking in the name of the opposition. When CASTRO announced elections for November 1952, ORAU reorganized and registered the Partido Aut\u00e9ntico, of which he was actually no longer a member, and declared that he would oppose CASTRO as presidential candidate in the national elections. ORAU's move from PRIO's group, represented in Cuba by the \"official\" party, was under the direction of Antifascistas Nacionales, without legality.\n\nPRIO, VANDA and other PRIO leaders therefore declared themselves against CASTRO and his supporters and refused to support them during the elections. CASTRO's supporters, however, were elected to public office in the November 1952 elections.\n\nAmong PRIO's principal supporters are the following:\n\nCarlos PRIO\nRa\u00fal CASTRO\nEugenio CASTRO\nLuis FERN\u00c1NDEZ\nFidel CASTRO\nCarlos CASTRO\nSergio CASTRO\nJos\u00e9 CASTRO\nMiguel CASTRO\nClassification\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\nThe Partido del Pueblo Cubano (Ortodoxo), founded by Eduardo Chibas, was organized by president members of the PSC(A) as a political party to oppose PRD's organization. It was undoubtedly the majority party in Cuba in 1952 and until Chibas' death remained a strong political force drawing its strength from the masses. However, with Chibas' death and PRD's exile it faded in importance and today is small and divided.\n\nDr. Carlos Mart\u00ednez Sterling, who has presidential ambitions, attempted to take over control of the party after Chibas' death but was unsuccessful in holding it intact. Ra\u00fal Chibas, brother of Eduardo, now heads one faction of the party. Another faction, Ortodoxa Libre, has been formed by Carlos Mart\u00ednez Sterling. Dr. Antonio Mart\u00ednez Prada, who was denied membership in the original Ortodoxo party, has a leading role in the \"Ortodoxa Libre,\" still another faction of the original group is headed by Roberto Mart\u00ednez, who also has presidential ambitions, while another group of followers of the original Ortodoxo Party remain loyal to Mart\u00ednez, a member of the Directive Council of the Party. OCHIA has refused to accept the guarantees of the MELITA government and return to Cuba from Miami and thus does not participate directly in Ortodoxo activities at present. Still another group of Ortodoxo members either are favorable or sympathetic to the \"unification\" thesis introduced by Mart\u00ednez and his followers. At a recent meeting of the party at Teatro Var\u00edet\u00e9, AMONTE and other leaders were present, and there was considerable talk of promoting armed revolt against the present regime. \"Del Chibas,\" who is now in Miami, has an armed force of about 100 men called \"Chief of the Government\" of Mariana. MAR\u00cdN, a young Ortodoxo, is at present in Venezuela, planning an armed expedition for Cuba which reportedly will be brought in by a group of fishermen via La Colona, Pinar del R\u00edo.\n\nComment. In order to clear up the confusion created by sources concerning the PSC(A), it is pointed out that the original Ortodoxo Charter drawn up by the Ortodoxo on 23 March 1952 was signed by AMONTE, OCHIA, MART\u00cdNEZ STERLING, Pepe Chibas, Antonio Mart\u00ednez Prada, and others with independent tendencies. The president of this, the \"Unified\" Ortodoxo, is Ra\u00fal Chibas. Recently MAR\u00cdN's Ortodoxo split from the \"Unified\" Ortodoxo and formed the Ortodoxa Libre. Another group known as the Registered Ortodoxo is under the leadership of Federico Fern\u00e1ndez Casas. Apparently sources, in commenting on the various \"groups\" headed by AMONTE, Ra\u00fal Chibas, and OCHIA, is referring to the popular following these individuals have within the \"Unified\" Ortodoxo. They do not as such represent a separate segment of the Ortodoxo party.\nProbably the most politically active and influential segment of the Ortodoxo party is the youth branch, the Juventud Ortodoxo (JO). It has representation in just about every town in the country and is particularly active at the University of Havana. Dr. Francisco Vidal, University professor and member of the Directiva Council of the Ortodoxo Party, is adviser of the JO. CATRO is well known for his leftist leanings. Actually, when the Partido Ortodoxo was in the original stages of organization, Communists at Havana University prepared and circulated in organizing the JO. The JO frequently attacks the U.S. with slogans that dictatorships exist in Latin America because their anti-communism pleases the U.S. On 27 September, for example, Dr. Palacios, a well-known Ortodoxo prominent in JO activities, stated on a television question-and-answer program that the dictatorship of Batista subverts because the Department of State is flatly anti-Communist, which is not anti-Communist but anti-democratic. The following are some of the more prominent pro-Communists who influence the Juventud Ortodoxo.\n\nMax Vald\u00e9s, director of the Juventud Ortodoxo, is Secretary of the Consejo de la Juventud, organized by the Comunista, and has signed numerous Marxist manifestos.\n\nMax Vald\u00e9s, who was an active Communist propagandist in the University, has signed all Marxist manifestos issued at the University and has been seen on different occasions with Alfredo Vidal and Ra\u00fal Vald\u00e9s Vivo, (well-known Communists) close friends of his.\n\nSalvador Vald\u00e9s, Juventud director, has a Communist background and is a member of the same University group.\n\nMr. Vald\u00e9s, pro-Communist, has signed manifestos in favor of Castro and against the 1953 anti-Communist legislation. He is a member of the same University group.\n\nThe Movimiento de Liberaci\u00f3n Radical is a move to form public opinion and not a political party. It is built around the worldwide movement of \"Catholic Action\" with branches in Cuba in the Juventud de Acci\u00f3n Cat\u00f3lica, Juventud Estudiantil Cat\u00f3lica, Juventud Obrera Cat\u00f3lica, and Juventud Universitaria Cat\u00f3lica. These organizations are forbidden by the Church to make part as such in national politics. However, An\u00edbal Vald\u00e9s and Andr\u00e9s Vald\u00e9s Vivo and other members of the organizations have gotten together with other intellectuals and formed the Movimiento de Liberaci\u00f3n Radical to oppose the present regime. This movement, which is purely ideological, has no Communist influence up to the present time.\n\nThe Movimiento de la Juventud is also not a political party but rather a movement to arouse public interest, has gained little strength to date. Its chief spokesman, Jos\u00e9 Antonio Llada, manages to keep it alive with propaganda, but there is little likelihood that it by itself will reach a position of any importance on the local political scene.\n\nAs independent movements, neither the Movimiento de Liberaci\u00f3n Radical nor the Movimiento de la Juventud has little or any chance of becoming strong.\nenough to register as a political entity. Their strength, if any, will be\nin the number of followers they can count on to join one of the registered\nopposition parties in the next election and the amount of influence they can\ntherefore assert on the party's policy.\nCONFFIDENTIAL\n\nSubject: Anti-Communist Propaganda\nIssued by the FBI\n\nReport No.: EX-622\n\nDate of Information: 9 February 1955\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nDate Acquired: 12 February 1955\n\nEvaluation: Para 1 - 0-2\n\nDate of Report: 23 February 1955\n\nSource: Controlled American\n\n1. A one page mimeographed sheet entitled \"A Cuba Plane for Nixon\" was written and edited in the offices of the Federacion Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU) at the University of Havana. At least several hundred copies were run off on the mimeograph machine owned by the Faculty of Commercial Sciences and were distributed throughout the university grounds by Armando Milian. There was some street distribution in the near vicinity of the University. The sheet was placed on the copy desk of the FEU plant which took place during the week preceding the Nixon visit. There abortive plans included a street demonstration against the visit.\n\n2. The mimeographed sheet asks the question, \"Why did you come Mr. Nixon?...To help the revolution of power by Batista?...To extend the official action of giving away our natural resources to United States monopolies?...To support the tactics of Batista against Castro and prevent him one of the Cuban and dictator...With regard to the above, the undersigned protests this visit which interferes in our internal affairs and attacks our dignity even more than the defiling of the statues of our heroes by the Yankee soldiers and of Cuban women.\n\nLuis Carlos Menocal\nJose Nildago Perez\nR. Alfonso Llanes\nRamiro Vidal\n\nThe sheet then concludes with the note, \"The press, radio and television under the orders of Batista and the North American Embassy have repeated these declarations.\"\n\nField Comments:\n\n1. The clandestine communist publication Cuba General of 16 February 1955 asserts 7000 copies of the sheet were distributed.\n\n2. The clandestine communist mimeographed newsletter Havana Continental of 15 February 1955 quotes in extenso the FBI sheet.\n\nClassification: CONFIDENTIAL\n\n19-7-2-108\nFrom: Havana, Cuba\n\nReport No.: W3-551\n\nLocal File No.: 10-18\n\nNumber of Pages: 1\n\nNumber of Enclosures: None\n\nReport Made by: Stephen H. Karmarkoff\n\nApproved by: Henry T. Bachelet\n\nDistribution:\n\nBy copy to:\n\n2 - Wash\n1 - Embassy and LA\n1 - File\n\nOrally to: None\n\nSource Cryptonym: AMPIEDARCH/1 via AMPIEDARCH/II\n\nReferences: EK-961, 13 January 1955\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nEvaluation of source is for distribution to AMPIEDARCH/II.\n\nFILE IN 201-2092 SP\n\nINDEX\n\nCLASSIFIED\n\nFILE IN 201-2092 SP\n\nINDEX\n\nCLASSIFIED\nSubject: Communist Influence in the FEU, University of Havana\n\nReport No.: H-951\n\nDate of Information: 10-20 January 1955\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nDate Acquired: 28 January 1955\n\nEvaluation: B-\n\nDate of Report: 2 February 1955\n\nSource: Controlled American\n\n1. Communist activities in the University, particularly in connection with Federacion Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU, Federation of University Students) affairs, have increased during the last few weeks. Almost daily informal meetings are being held by Ramon VALDES Vives, Carlos SANCHEZ, Leonel SANCHEZ, ALEJANDRO, and Luis DONOS RODRIGUEZ. Usually these conversations concern election campaigns in the various student organizations, and facilities for the preparation and distribution of propaganda.\n\n2. Indicative of FEU attitude toward the communists, students Roberto VIVITE and Federico SANCHEZ de la Raza commented, \"the present and former regimes of the FEU have been obliged to work with the red elements since these elements were better disciplined for combat against the government.\"\n\n3. On 10 January 1955 a crowd of a hundred or so students took part in a ceremony on the 10th Anniversary of the death of Communist youth leader Julio Antonio Mella. President in the ceremony were: Jose MACHADO, Andres LUNA, Leciel ALONSO, Alberto VIVIANO, Ramon VALDES Vives, Ramon VIVIANO, Jose A. VIVIANO, and Max LAGUARDIA.\n\n4. At the ceremony there was distributed a 12 page pamphlet entitled, \"Ideas de Ideas,\" purportedly written by Julio Antonio Mella. Although mildly against the Batista government, the bulk of the articles in the pamphlet are anti-United States, anti-capitalist, and in short typical communist propaganda.\n\nSource Comment: Paragraph 2 is more true than the FEU leaders themselves would like to believe. The FEU, unfavored with the \"red aces\" has long been notorious for empty, loud-mouthed sessions and propaganda. The reds simply inject a little more organization and intellectual reality and thus create a more effective appeal. All Latin students have a streak (large or small) of anti-U.S. sentiment, but not all will follow any empty-headed jerk who gets up to scream about \"imperialism.\" A large percentage will respond to a subtle intellectual \"realism,\" particularly where it is pinned down for their participation. They certainly agree but with the \"intellectual antimony\" explanation.\n\nMission Comment: Official Electoral on 11 January 1955 contains a photograph of the ceremony mentioned in paragraph 3.\n\nClassification: SECRET\n\n19-4-110-18\nThe attached report is based on information extracted from a secret report submitted by [REDACTED] to the chief of [REDACTED], with the exception of paragraph 3. Information in that paragraph was received verbally from [REDACTED].\nSECRET\n\nSubject: Past between Cuban Communists and Orthodox Party Leaders\n\nPlace Acquired: Habana, Cuba\n\nEvolution: D-3\n\nSource: Controlled American\n\n1. A past has been completed between leaders of the Partido Socialista Popular (PSP, Cuban Communist Party) and certain leaders of the Orthodox Party for the purpose of combating the Falista regime. Among those present at the meetings which led to this past end which were held in the law offices of Dr. E. P. Peralta, located at Calle O'Reilly No. 107, were Carlos Rafael Rodriguez, Communist, Gregorio Garcia Ponce, Communist, Francisco M. Ortiz, Marxist, and Antonio L. Martinez, leader of the Orthodox youth, Jose Antonio, president of the Federation of Students University, and a member of the Catholic Youth and a follower of former president Carlos Prio. Other meetings were held in the law offices of Communist lawyers, located in the Plaza de la Catedral, Havana, and in the offices of radio station Radio Progress, and Antonio Martinez. The agenda for all these meetings was \"CONTRA FALISTA.\"\n\n2. Behind this past is the desire of the Orthodox leaders involved to seize control of the leadership of the Orthodox Party and realize by the PSP that it needs to stir up its adherents with some strong action and to prove to the Cuban people that its charges against president-elect Fulgencio Batista have been legitimate ends. The past calls for a two-phase attack on the Government, the first phase being the propaganda campaign against the proposed \"Via Cuba\" canal, to convince the masses that Batista is a traitor, and the second phase being one of aggressive action. The latter action would have as its objective the sabotage of the national economy and would be accomplished, mainly, by incurring with the major shipping lines and the shipping activities. Included in this action is the setting fire to sugar plantations on a large scale, agitation among the sugar workers over salary and disciplinary questions, a \"strike\" (strike strike) movement in the port workers' sector over the creation of bulk shipments of sugar which would pave the way for the union of the port workers and sugar workers, and the intensification of strikes and the support of strikers' demands in all industries. The final step would be the launching of another propaganda campaign, begun by members of student, industrial workers, and professional men's organizations, prior to the assumption of the presidency by Batista.\n3. The Servicio de Inteligencia Militar (SIM) is reported to have seized anti-Castro propaganda issued by the Movimiento Fidelista Cubano. The propaganda was found on the person of an Oriente leader from Oriente Province, who was detained by SIM on 3 January 1958.\n\nField Comment:\n\n1. Information was received by the Legal Attach\u00e9 on 27 December 1957 from a source active in the revolutionary underground in Cuba that Cuban Communists were directing a plan to set fire to sugar cane fields in order to sabotage the Cuban sugar crop. Participating in the plan were revolutionaries opposed to the present Cuban administration.\n\n2. Communist role in the anti-Government campaign on the subject of the \"Fita Cuba\" canal was previously reported.\nFrom: Havana, Cuba\n\nReport No: HMI-921\nLocal File No: L-6\n\nNo. of Pages: 2\nNo. of Enclosures: none\n\nReport Made By: Shown A. L. Lippman 1/24\nApproved By: Henry T. Burcher\n\nDistribution:\nBy copy to: 2-Wash\n1-Emb & LA, NA\n2-Files\n\nOrally to: none\n\nSource Component: AUCJET\n\nReferences: HPL-921\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nSubject: Communist Activity Against Proposed \"Via Cuba\" Canal\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\n19-4-117-7\nSubject: Communist Activity Against Proposed \"Via Cuba\" Canal\n\nReport No: HX-943\n\nDate of Information: 10-20 December 1954\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nDate Acquired: 10-20 December 1954\n\nEvaluation: B-3\n\nDate of Report: 29 December 1954\n\nSource: Controlled American\n\n1. On 9 December 1954, the Servicio de Inteligencia Militar (SIM, Cuban Military Intelligence Service) received information that the Partido Socialista Popular (PSP, Cuban Communist Party) had plans to launch a strong anti-Government campaign based on the subject of the proposed \"Via Cuba\" canal. The PSP planned to remain behind the scenes and to use as many elements of the opposition as it could to sponsor its propaganda line that the present Government had sold out to the United States and that the proposed canal was merely an extension of the Panama Canal. Groups from the Ortodoxo Party (Partido del Pueblo Cubano Ortodoxo), led by Luis A. Ferrer, reportedly collaborated with the PSP in the planning of the protest campaign against the canal. Cuban intellectuals and professional men, sympathetic to Communism or connected in one way or another with the PSP, were to be the ones who would launch the campaign, stressing the selling-out-of-sovereignty theme and the need for a popular referendum before any Cuban government made any treaty or agreement affecting the territorial integrity of the nation.\n\n2. On 11 December 1954, the Cuban press published an article concerning a call made by Luis A. Ferrer in the name of the national executive committee of the Ortodoxo Party, to all youth organizations, including the Juventud Socialista (JS, Cuban Communist youth organization) and other organized centers of public opinion, to attend a meeting at radio station C.O.C.O. on 13 December 1954, in order to join in the protest against the Government's plan to build the \"Via Cuba\" canal. On 16 December 1954, at nine o'clock in the evening, approximately 85 persons met at radio station C.O.C.O. in answer to LERMA's call or in accordance with instructions from the PSP. About 35 of these persons were Communists, representing \"barrio\" (ward) committees of the PSP in Havana or Communist labor syndicates, and the remainder were Ortodoxo members, many of whom had had close ties with the Communists in the past. Among the latter were LERMA, Francisco Macias, and Mario Pizarro. Present also was Manuel Rodriguez, owner of the radio station and recently elected representative on the Partido Revolucionario Socialista (PRS) ticket, who advised a SIM officer at the meeting that he had permitted the meeting to go on the air after learning of the Communist infiltration and had only allowed the participants the use of the station's hall because there was no radio commentator and journalists had made such a commitment to LERMA and he could not let PALDO claim down.\n3. The evening's program included speeches by four persons, representing the Ortodoxo party and Cuban youth, who attacked the economic, labor, and social policies of the Government, the absorption of Cuban oil by \"Yankee Imperialists,\" the interference of the United States government in the affairs of the Latin American nations and its support of those which were dictatorships, as well as the proposed plan of the Cuban government to build a canal which would involve the ceding of more Cuban territory to foreign interests (i.e., the United States). The meeting closed with the creation of committees charged with formulating public protest throughout Cuba against the present regime and against \"Yankee Imperialism.\"\n\n4. In addition to the role it played in organizing the meeting at radio station C.O.C.O. on 16 December 1954, the FSP has also succeeded in arousing popular sentiment against the proposed canal among the university students, members of labor unions, and members of educational, cultural, and civic institutions. It has been stressing in its propaganda that the canal will constitute a principal military target and place the country in the danger zone of atomic nuclear bomb warfare. The FSP leaders consider this anti-canal movement as a rallying point for all anti-estadista elements which can possibly be converted into the long-sought \"National Democratic Front.\" Jos\u00e9 F. Cueto Liada who championed the \"Voto Negativo\" (vote against ESTISTA) prior to the general elections of 1954, has also called on the matter of the proposed canal to attack the present government by calling for a \"total union of the masses in defense of the national integrity and the complete liquidation of the present regime.\" During his television program on 17 December 1954, another vehicle being used by the FSP to spread its anti-canal propaganda in the Asociaci\u00f3n Latino-Americana Libre, a cultural organization reported to be a Communist front, whose board of officers includes a Communist leader and a Communist youth leader of national standing, Dr. J. A. Val and Gregorio M. O'Hara, respectively.\n\nField Comments\n\n1. El Diario Varec\u00e1n (clandestine Communist publication), No. 69, dated 8 December 1954, contained an article which denounced, in very strong language, the plan to build the \"Via Cuba Canal.\" Approximately a week later the overt Cuban press took up this subject, presenting the pros as well as the cons, and was still carrying articles on it as late as 20 December 1954.\n\n2. President-elect Fulgencio Batista and the present chief of the Cuban Navy, Contralmirante Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda U. Calder\u00f3n, have issued public statements defending the plan to build the canal and blaming the Communists for launching \"an insidious campaign against a project as nationalistic as the \"Canal Via Cuba\" would be\" and accusing the opposition elements who have taken advantage of that campaign to attack the present government. Despite these statements and others by other government officials, the defense of the proposed project has been so weak, both technically and politically, that public sentiment against the project has apparently increased considerably since mid-December 1954.\n| Date | Officer | Initials | Comments |\n|------|---------|----------|----------|\n| 25 MAR 1954 | WH | E | 10. Remo CARANO, alcina |\n| | 3/10/54 | E | Copy Detached |\n\n**DISSEMINATED IN SO**\n\n**NOT DISSEMINATED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS**\n\n1. **Date:** 25 MAR 1954\n2. **File:** 201-0376-2\n3. **File:** 201-0376-2\n4. **File:** 201-0376-2\n\n**FILE IN:** 201-209258\nSECRET\n\nCONTROL - U.S. OFFICIALS ONLY\n\nHKN - 737\n\nPage 1\n\n1. AMPUTES advised GROVER on 7 March 1954 that he had been instructed by his chief to prepare a \"paquete\" (trans-pp) of subject, and as directed, he had prepared a false report emphasizing subject's communist connections and activities. He made available the original draft of his memorandum which is identical to a memorandum received by Ambassador GARZON from the head of the Cuban Army on 8 March. Also included with the memorandum to the Ambassador was a copy of a letter allegedly sent from Paris by subject to Fidel CASTRO, leader of the attempted uprising in Santiago de Cuba in July 1953, and presently serving a sentence at the Isle of Pines penitentiary.\n\n2. It is not known at this time whether the letter included with the memorandum sent to Ambassador GARZON is a copy of a legitimate piece of correspondence, or whether this also has been fabricated by the KGB to give added strength to their character assassination effort. We will endeavor to clarify this point at a future meeting with AMPUTES. Copies of the letter to CASTRO are forwarded herewith to Headquarters and Paris.\n\nSECRET\n\nCONTROL - U.S. OFFICIALS ONLY\n\nHKN - 737\n\nPage 2\n\n9 March 1954\n\n201 - 53702\nSubject: Dr. Ramiro ALARCO Alcain\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nEvaluation: as indicated\n\nSource: Controlled American\n\nDate of Information: 1950-date\n\nDate Acquired: 8 March 1954\n\nDate of Report: 9 March 1954\n\nSECRET\n\n1. The Cuban Government, to further discredit subject, has prepared a memorandum containing a series of false charges concerning his communist connections and activities. The memorandum was prepared by the Cuban Servicio de Inteligencia Militar for forwarding to the United States Government with the intention that action would then be taken by the United States to remove subject's wife from her present employment with the United States Army in Paris.\n\n2. There follows an English translation of the points covered by the SMI in the memorandum of false accusations:\n\nDr. Ramiro ALARCO Alcain, an attorney, is a relative of ex-President Juan GUAL Bas Martin. During GUAL's regime, ALARCO was appointed Chancellor of the Cuban Embassy in Oslo, Norway, but was relieved of his post after he was detained by the Norwegian authorities for possession of a shipment of contraband nylon hose. Upon his return to Cuba, he was detained by the Bureau of Investigations when a sample case of precious stones was found among his personal effects.\n\nALARCO is an affiliate of the Partido del Pueblo Cubano (Ortegista), and a member of the Committee of Attorneys for that party.\n\nALARCO is a member of the revolutionary group which includes (a) Palma, (b) LECHE, (c) Fidel CASTRO, (d) Eloy GARCIA, and (e) ALARCO, and was a participant in the uprising at Cienfuegos, Santiago de Cuba, in the summer of 1953. He is a close friend of Fidel CASTRO (long-time militant of the Revolutionary Socialist) and his brother, Ra\u00fal CASTRO, also a communist, both of whom are presently in prison for participation in the communist-sponsored Santiago uprising. ALARCO attended the meeting of Cuban oppositionists in Montreal in July 1953, and along with Fidel CASTRO, Ra\u00fal CASTRO, and Sec. ALARCO, he was a member of the communist party in the territory of Palma, representing the Partido Unico de los Trabajadores Comunistas-Cubanos-Ortegistas. ALARCO is reported to have represented the communist interests, although he was charged with defense of the Ortegista policy, and was known to have been in contact with communist leaders. He has been cited on several occasions as a \"comunista de apoyo filial,\" and as such has permitted the Cuban communist party to infiltrate various elements which were formerly\nhostile to the communists. ARANGO is believed to belong to the secret\ncadres of the Partido Socialista Popular, although his activities have\nbeen carried on behind an Orthodox Front, such as in the case of\nLEONCIO, Vicente ARANGU, et al.\n\nAt present, ARANGO and his wife are in Paris, having left Cuba on\n10 December 1953 in the company of Osvaldo ANDRES Perez, who had sought\nasylum in the Haitian Embassy in Havana, and both individuals are reported\nto be in contact with the revolutionary Orthodox-Communist-Friista elements,\nthrough a clandestine worldwide communist communications system. The wife\nof ARANGO, who is reported to be a member of the Swedish Royal family, is\npresently employed in the office of the United States Army in Paris.\n\nField Reports\nFiles of this office indicate the following concerning subject,\nin addition to the information set out in our memorandum of\n19 May 1953:\n\nA Legal Attach\u00e9 report of 3 April 1957 states that Ramiro ARANGO\nAlain was appointed Chancellor of the Cuban Embassy in Moscow\nat the age of 27, on the recommendation of Justo JUAREZ, President\nof the Partido Socialista Popular (PS), Rafael P\u00c9REZ, and Dr. OSCAR CALLE. He was not known to have engaged in\ncommunist activities, but was reported as \"inclined toward socialist\ntheories.\" At the time of this appointment, ARANGO had no\ndiplomatic experience.\n\nIn August 1952 subject was arrested by the SD for activities\nagainst the regime.\n\nOn 16 September 1953, subject was arrested for activities against\nthe government, and taken to La Habana. At this time a consider-\nable number of known opponents were arrested, including the\nPSF leaders Edmundo FELA and Josu\u00e9 GROGU.\n| Type | Book No. | Date | Page | Officer's Initials | Comments |\n|------|----------|------|------|-------------------|----------|\n| 3    | 123      | 12/15/19 | 412 | R.               | Revolutionary activities in the Caribbean |\n| 3    | 456      | 12/15/19 | 412 | R.               | Finished |\n| 3    | 789      | 12/15/19 | 412 | R.               | CS-DB-1669, 5000, in line to R-1-522 |\n\n**Notes:**\n- CS-DB-1669, 5000, in line to R-1-522\n- Finished\n\n**Date:** 2 Feb 1954\n\n**File In:** 2Q1-200255\nTO: Chief, MI\nFROM: Chief of Mission, Havana\nSUBJECT: Operational\nSPECIFIC: Report of Revolutionary Preparations in Central America Against Cuban Government\n\n1. No additional information concerning alleged plans of the Caribbean Legion to attack the Batista government has been received by the Mission. The latest available information regarding revolutionary activities against that government is contained in HX-418.\n\n2. Reports received in the past concerning the Caribbean Legion's attempts to enlist BATISTA's support for Legion revolutionary activities have been given a low evaluation (as to content), as indicated in the pertinent portions of HX-167 and HX-397. To date the Mission has received no information which would warrant changing such an evaluation.\n\n3. Indications here are that the Batista regime is too preoccupied with a possible revolt attempt originating within the country to permit planning for any offensive action against any other country in the Caribbean. Recent friendly overtures by BATISTA, in the form of decorations bestowed on Hector TRUJILLO of the Dominican Republic and PEREZ Jimenez of Venezuela, also serve to indicate that the present Cuban government is not contemplating any action against those countries.\n\n4. As to a possible attack on the Batista regime from outside Cuba, the Cuban Armed Forces and security agencies have long been alerted to a possible air attack on key installations in Havana as well as multiple assaults from the sea. Recent visits by RICA and CHILE have been mentioned as possible take-off points for the planes to be used in the air attack.\n\n5. The Mission has no information to confirm the allegations made in the attachment to the Department of State Instruction cited in the referenced dispatch concerning the...\nSECRET\n\nemphasizing the concentration of arms in the hands of Cuban youth leaders. \n\nDistribution\n3 - Vich\n1 - File\n\n20 January 1959\n\nSECRET\n\n20-7-36-1971\nSECRET\n\nCuba\n\nEvaluation of Report of Revolutionary Preparations in Central America Against Cuban Government\n\nEl January 1954\n\nCuba, Havana\n\n1. No additional information concerning alleged plans of the Caribbean Legion to attack the Batista government have been received in Havana, Cuba. Reports received there in the past concerning the Caribbean Legion's attempts to enlist Batista's support for Legion revolutionary activities have been given a low evaluation. To date the Havana Mission has received no information which would warrant changing such evaluation.\n\n2. Indications in Cuba are that the Batista regime is too preoccupied with a possible revolt attempt originating within the country to permit planning for any offensive action against any other country in the Caribbean area. Recent friendly overtures by Batista, in the form of decorations bestowed on Hector Espinillo of the Dominican Republic and Felix Jimenez of Venezuela, also serve to indicate that the present Cuban government is not contemplating any action against those countries.\n\n3. As to a possible attack on the Batista regime from outside Cuba, the Cuban armed forces and security agencies have long been alerted for a possible air attack on key installations in Havana as well as multiple airfields from the sea. Mexico, Costa Rica, and Guatemala have been mentioned as possible take-off points for planes to be used in the air attack.\n\n4. There has been no information received which would confirm the allegations concerning the concentration of arms in the hands of Cuban youth leaders. Jose Rolando, Max Lescot, and Pedro Guerra are well-known leaders of the Juventud Ortodoxa (Orthodox Youth) and, as such, have participated in youth opposition activities against the Batista government, demanding the restoration of the Constitution of 1910 and the holding of general elections.\n\nDistribution: GCI\n\nSECRET 16 Feb. 54\n\nFEB\nSECRET\n\nTO: Case, WD\nFROM: Acting Chief of Station, Lima, Peru\nSUBJECT: General\n\nSpecific: Douglas Hadden Allen\n\nAction required by Headquarters: For information and such action as is deemed necessary.\n\n1. Douglas Hadden Allen is President of the Astoria Importing & Manufacturing Company, Inc., in Iquitos, Peru, and a director of the Cerro de Pasco Corporation. He is personally acquainted with Ambassador Harold W. Titelman.\n\n2. On 18 September 1953, Subject talked at this Station to see Winthrop T. Heggan, who was out of Lima at that time. He talked with Jane C. Heggan and at her suggestion that he talk with the Chief of the Political Section stated that he wanted to talk only with Heggan, that he had confidential information on Rafael Payleitich Trujillo, Prefect of Iquitos (and brother of former Communist functionary, Rafael Payleitich Trujillo), and some Communist literature which had come into his possession. Subject returned to the United States on 2 October 1953 without trying to contact Heggan again.\n\n3. Former agent Duffield, who has made a nuisance of himself by calling sporadically at this Station, told Heggan on 1 October 1953 that he was planning to apply for an immigration visa to the United States and that Subject had tried to contact Heggan on Duffield's behalf in connection with the anticipated application. Duffield further claimed that Subject has a close friend who is a senior official of CIGNA from whom he had gotten Duffield's name, and that Subject had shown Duffield a picture of a Peruvian Communist which Duffield remembered having submitted to this Station five or six years ago. It seems quite likely that Duffield gave Subject Heggan's name.\n\n4. In connection with another matter (LIMA-0140), Heggan contacted the subject of Duffield, who, in the course of conversation, told of having received a letter (encl. 1) through\nSECRET\n\nSPLA-78\nPage 4\n\nHis New York office from Subject. This letter forwarded a report (believed to be encl. 2) to Ernesto NICOLINI, Subject of SPLA-78, also told of having cocktails on several occasions in New York City several months ago with Subject and Ambassador TITUS. During one of these get-togethers Subject stated that a report (believed to be encl. 2) had been made available to KURAN.\n\n5. On 15 January 1954, DUTERRE volunteered a copy of enclosure 2 with the explanation that NICOLINI had sent it to him especially for KURAN but that NICOLINI wanted it back. When questioned as to the source of the document, DUTERRE said that he did not know the identity of the source but that it had come from an English aviator. The document provided by DUTERRE has not been shown to Subject of SPLA-78.\n\n6. SPLA-78 and references, and LIMA-0219 suggest that Augusto ROVERO Lovo, Minister of Government and Police, Mariano Aljoven, a confidential investigator on President CHILA's staff; Ernesto NICOLINI, a prominent and wealthy Peruvian businessman; DUTERRE, employee of Ernesto NICOLINI; and Luis QUEVEDO NICOLINI, nephews and employees of Ernesto NICOLINI, are associated in some sort of intelligence work, which is separate from the intelligence activities of Alejandro ESPARZA, Director of Government and Municipalities, who is immediately inferior to ROVERO Lovo in the Ministry of Government. On the basis of the foregoing data and references, it appears that Subject is involved with intelligence operatives of the Peruvian Government on one hand, and is in contact with KURAN and other U.S. Government officials on the other hand.\n\n7. It is noted that enclosures 1 and 2 both have the initials \"KURAN\", presumably the initials of Subject's secretary.\n\n[Signature]\n\nWhitney T. Haysman\n\nAnthony T. Haysman\n\nEnclosures:\n1. Ltr dated 25 Nov 53, in trip\n2. Rpt copied 18 Nov 53, in trip\n\nDistribution:\n3 - Rep, w/encls as noted\n2 - Files, w/encls (2 copies)\n\n2600. 1/4\n\nSECRET\nEarly in April of 1952, about a month after the Coup de Etat of General Fulgencio Batista, the deposed president, Dr. Carlos Prio Socarras entrusted to his ex-minister of Education and State, Dr. Aureliano Sanches Arango, the responsibility of organizing a vast subversive movement, created to oppose in turn Batista, and return to power the Cuban Revolutionary Party (Partido Revolucionario Cubano). This was at all possible. The first steps taken by Dr. Sanches Arango were to give a political form to the movement, and to create favorable conditions for an uprising (putch) at the precisely opportune moment, to be called \"the zero hour.\" Immediately after Batista took over, the PRC, having lost prestige of any kind of influence, since all former officials were dismissed by Batista. Hence Dr. Sanches Arango began to reconstruct the PRC, placing in the positions of command some of the most sincere members of the party, most of whom had formerly been in secondary status in party affairs, and in Government offices.\n\nWhile Dr. Antonio de Varona was again made President, men such as Dr. Araceli Acu\u00f1a, Dr. Armando Hernandez and a few others, became the most prominent figures of the Party. Immediately, the PRC began a campaign of passive legal opposition to the administration of the Batista Government, whose every step received the condemnation and adverse criticism of the Propaganda Committee of the Party. In addition, three times a week in the newspaper, Free Press (Prensa Libre), articles by Dr. Araceli Acu\u00f1a and Dr. Prio Socarras pictured the present Government as a \"do nothing\" one, with policies of lack of policies, contrary to the public interest. At the same time the articles were designed to restore to the Party the faith which formerly it had enjoyed from the Cuban masses.\n\nIn the meantime, Dr. Sanches Arango initiated the opposition by force in the Central American countries. Almost immediately he found that the reconstructed PRC was gaining no ground with the people and that he would have to create a new political formula to draw to the side of the opposition of insurrection, the general populace, by now disgusted not only with the Batista Government, but with the PRC as well. It was proposed that Dr. Roberto Aguirre, head of the People's Party (Partido del Pueblo Cubano), have an interview with Dr. Prio in Miami, but the former declined on the ground that his party wanted to remain neutral in the whole affair. However, Emilio M. Chacon opposed openly the ideas of his chief (Dr. Aguirre) advocating an alliance of the two parties to make the opposition more effective. To this end, he went to Guatemala to see Dr. Sanches Arango. While there, conferences were held in the home of Dr. Paul Cogswell, then Ambassador of Guatemala in Cuba, and new Foreign Minister of the Government of Colonel Arbenz. These talks resulted in the creation of the two parties. On the return of Dr. Chacon to Cuba, eventually the amalgamation was effected with equal administration on the part of both of the parties. This end was hastened by a surreptitious visit of Dr. Arango (Sanches) to his native soil (he was then a political refugee in Guatemala).\n\nFrom the moment Batista took over the power in Cuba, Guatemala placed itself unconditionally on the side of Dr. Prio and served as a base for the military preparation of the conspiracy. Immediately the Caribbean League (logical) at the time reduced to impotency, began to function again, to take a preponderant\npart in Latin American relations. In the latter part of 1952, the military plan was drawn up by S\u00e1nchez Arango with the aid of Foreign Minister Paul Oviedo and often in the conferences the presidential candidate, Costa Rica, Jos\u00e9 Figueres took an active part, creating the support of Costa Rica should be elected president. Dr. Juan Jos\u00e9 Arango participated as well, to the extent of using his influence with the Guatemalan Army officials that they might join the movement later. On the Caribbean coast of Guatemala is a place called Livingston. To the east there is a road which leads to a little native village (Indigena) near for the moment forgotten by this agent. To the southwest of this place, there is a very bad road which ends in a little valley at the end of which there is a series of low hills. Back of these hills is located camp of the Caribbean Legion. Here is established the General Headquarters of the Guatemalan Army. There exists here a force of 4,000 men regularly trained, quartered and fed. \"Our practice is held daily under the direction of General Abelardo Cordero, veteran of the Spanish Civil War and one of the organizers of the movement of Cayo Guadalupe.\"\n\nThe force situated here is divided into two battalions, one named Battalion 4, PAULO ES LA TOLLENEZEAU, the other Battalion 5, IGORIO AQUINO. The force is divided into small groups and taught to use machine guns (towed type), also hand-type automatic rifles, automatic repeating rifles L-1. Nearly all the officers are veterans of the Spanish Civil War. In addition to the military practice, the officers get together once a week for conferences over historical and political matters as expressed by Juan Jos\u00e9 Arango, Ram\u00f3n Balderas, Aureliano S\u00e1nchez Arango, etc.\n\nNear Livingston there is a little gulf on which is situated Puerto Barrios. South of this port, there is a tiny port not marked on the map, named Montecristo. In this place with landing craft, practiced to land with the idea of disembarking in Cuba. From Montecristo, several shipments of arms have been made to Cuba. The other large concentration of men and arms is in Costa Rica.\n\nNorthwest of Puerto Lim\u00f3n on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica, there is a place known as La Virgen. Back of this reached by a small country road, back of some low hills, is found the camp. Here are 2,000 men or more divided into three battalions, 1st Augusto Cesar Sandino, 2nd Erazo, 3rd Antonio Kato. A little north of this camp, there is a kind of landing field which contains from (English) Lancaster bombers, originally from Canada by Ingeniero Carlos Navia in Canada. The men in this camp carry English repeating rifles, but they also have Thompson machine guns and Mortars machine guns with plenty of ammunition. The men in Guatemala also have this additional arm.\n\nThe plan is that on landing in Cuba of the \"patriots\" these arms will be given to all the civilians who are sympathetic with the cause. Cubans generally are more familiar with this type of arm than the English repeating rifles, which is not easy to learn in a few minutes. The majority of the planes are English. The leader of the outfit is a Canadian named Christopher, who was a Captain TAF during the war, flying Lancaster bombers. He is a personal friend of Carlos Figueres. This camp did not amount to much when Ulloa Gato was President of Costa Rica, but the minute Figueres came to power, the arms and men began to\nflow in, in quantity, from Guatemala, which has been the great center for the accumulation of arms. From a place in British Honduras named Middles, many rifles were secured with the connivance of British officers stationed there, then passed across the border.\n\nThe plan of invasion is as follows: When the zero hour comes, planes from Costa Rica and Guatemala will arrive at Habana prepared to drop bombs over the most important military posts in Cuba. As stated before, the crews of these planes are English \"mercenaries\" who, for money have agreed to take part in this adventure, regardless of their politics. Coincidentally, the men from the camps in Central America will be landed in various parts of the Island. At the same time there will appear in the streets numbers of both parties, well armed, to battle the local police, capture them, take over the civil authority. While all this fighting is going on, leaders of the political parties under the direction of Kusten (Kerensky) and Jesus Dominguez Cortes will capture the persons most prominent of the actual administration, who, once the revolution is successful, will be put in jail under the charge of murder. With this action, it is expected that most of the citizens will come over to the side of the conspirators. Judging from things heard by this agent in an interview held in a hotel between Juan Jose Arrieta and Ex-Colonel Cortes in Havana, the battle is set to take place before the general sale of the next sugar crop, about January of next year. While not within the province of this agent, he has learned that General Fornon is favorable to the conspiracy, sending arms of Argentine manufacture to the Central American camps.\n\nOn various occasions, cargoes of arms of different makes and kinds have been introduced into the Island, a procedure now only very difficult because of the vigilance of the Cuban airforce, who constantly patrol the seas between Cuba and Central America. This agent knows about the following demonstrations: In the lands of \"Cuba, orthodoxy, truth,\" headed by Jose Pimentel, and Bernardos, plane \"Cuban,\" there are more than 600 machine guns besides 10,000 grenades (hand type) all of Mexican manufacture. The arms are hidden in the \"place\" of the son of Jose Pimentel, Cortes, in Pina del Rio. In the hands of Pedro, former head of the youth movement in Havana, are about 100 machine guns, 50 grenades and 10 or 12 rifles M-1. The arms are hidden in a house situated near the \"Central Toledo\" property of the secretary general of the workers of that central.\n\nED 11/10/53\nThe fact that the Communist Party of Cuba would take the measures described in the attached report is not considered surprising. As can be seen from a study of Embassy dispatches and from our past reports on this subject, the FCP is finding itself in an increasingly worse position, politically, financially, and psychologically. The greatest strength of the FCP comes from its own members, by US standards, at least, expected. The current report suggests that the FCP has been weakened by internal dissension. It is only logical, therefore, that communist strength remains, at present, in the field where Marxist ideology has always been used to the best advantage, that of the agrarian workers. It is probable that the FCP, as a political party, will no longer copy the weight and respect it has in the past, at least until economic conditions in Cuba grow much worse, or until the present East-West tension diminishes considerably. Until recently, two possible solutions to the FCP's present predicament lay in its uniting with the Ortodox Party or with the FCP. Assuming the Ortodox Party, it is known that the leftist groups within that party (Vloostin, etc.) are anti-communist and are militating for a pact with the communists (the copy of a memorandum from E. T. GRAIN to the Ambassador, dated January 23, 1952, copy of which is attached), but, so far, have been checked by the anti-communist elements within the Ortodox Party. Until recently, conservative anti-DATISTA elements in Cuba stated with conviction that DATISTA would join with the communists in a selfish attempt to gain the Presidency. However, DATISTA, in two articles appearing in October, November 2 and 13, 1951, closed the door on rumors of this kind by stating the only way the FCP and the FID could unite would be if the FCP would publicly state that, in case of an international conflict, the FCP would side with the United Nations and against Russia. An interesting sequel to this statement, and possibly connected with it, was a leaflet distributed in the streets of Havana in early January entitled: \"To the Workers of the FID and to the People of Cuba,\" signed by Comandante FRANCO VELAS (Cuban), leader of the Blocos (Blocos del Pueblo), which is known for its leftist and pro-American sympathies. In the leaflet, FRANCO VELAS claimed that DATISTA had tried to destroy him and expel him from the Blocos, purportedly, because FRANCO VELAS had tried to defend \"the interest of the working classes and of the Blocos within the FID, a real and decided opposition line to the government, and is described that a united oppositionist front be formed to defend...\"\nThe pamphlet went on to say that \"the action of Fidel is a direct aid to the very government we are fighting, a government which uses the fascist system to destroy the leaders of the workers by putting ministers and thieves at the head of the syndicates, attacking the union halls and serving the ends of the exploiting magnates and oppressing and pursuing the true workers.\"\n\nIt is felt that the value of the attached information is primarily to point out a possible new force in the Cuban political scene, composed of labor groups, within the PCC and the Ortodox Party, who are dissatisfied with their own national party leadership and who can and probably will join with similar groups in the PCC in an attempt to get power for themselves.\nSubject: Recent Communist Advances Within the Anti-Government Labor Movement\n\nPlace Acquired: Havana, Cuba\n\nEvaluation: C-\n\nSource: Controlled Source\n\nThe two main centers of communist penetration and sympathy in the Cuban syndical movement are found in the Alianza Obrera del Partido Acci\u00f3n Cat\u00f3lica and in the Confederaci\u00f3n General de Trabajadores del Partido Socialista Popular (CUT). These groups have shown hostility for anti-communist labor leaders who have tried to join them despite the fact that these labor leaders are well-known for their honesty, ability, and good intentions in furthering the labor movement in Cuba. In the past few months, and more particularly within the past few weeks, the collaboration between these groups and the Partido Socialista Popular syndical element has become so close that it has alarmed the anti-communist Confederaci\u00f3n de Trabajadores de Cuba.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: As has been previously reported, the present political, as well as financial condition of the Cuban Communist Party is extremely serious. It would appear that the stigma of a past with the communists is sure political death for other political parties in the coming elections of June 1952. This has forced the PNP into an isolated position from which there does not appear to be any escape through aligning itself with another political party.\n\n2. The communists have been and are now carrying on a campaign in these syndicates to penetrate and undermine the anti-government labor sections in an effort to gain control of these groups at a later date. This campaign was waged in three stages.\n\na. The first stage was the communists' penetration of the anti-communist syndicates, paying up their union dues and using their voices and votes in the union meetings to propose and elect their candidates for committee positions.\n\nb. The second stage was to sow seeds of doubt among the members of these groups in joining with any of the anti-communist labor federations or with the government CIO by accusing the CIO leaders of having sold themselves out to the employers and to the government which are depicted as the enemies of the laboring man. The communists have always tried to exploit the anti-government feeling in these labor groups - particularly within the Alianza Obrera del Partido Socialista Popular - in an effort to destroy the anti-communist labor leaders in the various syndicates.\n\nClassification\nThe third stage, which seems to be going on now, is the ever increasing number of reproaches between the Ortodoxo and PAU labor leaders and the communists. This is the result of a and b (above), and is perhaps hastened by the strong movement of dissatisfaction with the PAU regime combined with their desire to vote this regime out of power in the forthcoming elections.\n\nAs an example of the success of this campaign, sources supply the following.\n\nIn the Sindicato Provincial de Obreros de la Gema de la Habana, elections for a new executive committee were held January 17, 1952. The anti-communist candidate led by Ramon F. A. won by more than 100 votes receiving 322 votes in all. However, the Ortodoxo candidates within the sindicato, supported by the communists and members of the Bloque Obrero del PAU, obtained 217 votes. In the Sindicato Textilera de San Antonio de los Ba\u00f1os, elections were also held recently. Again, the Ortodoxo, communist, and members of the PAU united against the anti-communist candidates. In this case, the anti-communist candidates won by only 16 votes, the anti-communists obtaining 141 and the opposition obtaining 125 votes.\n\nIn the Sindicato de Obreros y Empleados de Crucellas, S. A., the leadership is held by the Ortodoxo, Emilio Llano and Fernando. Up until recently, these leaders were in sympathy with the anti-communist CTC. However, they have recently permitted the entry of communists into their sindicato without requiring them to pay up their back dues. These leaders have also become friendly with the communist leader, Angel Torres, who is a member of the PSP Executive Committee of the Carro district, and two other communists, one an (ind) and another who goes by the name \"Praga-Miquel\".\n\nCONCLUSIONS: We have no traces on Angel Torres. His name does not appear as a delegate to the Habana PSP Municipal Assembly from the Carro district.\n\nThese communists and the two Ortodoxo leaders of the Crucellas sindicato are often seen together in the Club Crucellas which is opposite the Crucellas plant. At the present time, there is a good deal of labor unrest in this plant because the owners are attempting to reduce the labor force. Some of the workers are reporting that the sindicato join with the government CTC so that the latter body will take action and prevent them from losing their jobs. In answer to this, the Ortodoxo leaders in the plant are saying that the Crucellas workers will have to solve this problem by themselves as the government CTC is only the \"tool of the employers and of PAU who has sold out to the big industrialists\". The workers are tired, demoralized and discouraged and are saying, \"And was this the reason the communists were expelled from the CTC? It was a thousand times better under Leoncio!\" A desire to join any group which might help them in their present plight - including the communists - is now becoming stronger.\nSOURCE COMMENT: The owners of the Grumelle plant are in the process of reducing the labor force by 50-60% and hope to maintain the same production rate as before. The dismissed workers will be transferred to a new plant in the process of construction where the detergent, \"FAB\", is to be manufactured. The workers are discouraged because they claim that the work performed in the Grumelle plant requires all of the present labor force and the company should hire additional men to work in the FAB plant. The attempt of the Grumelle owners to reduce the labor force in this manner is against standing labor laws of the country, but the Grumelle syndicate led by the Grumelle labor leaders who are being advised by their communist friends, is taking advantage of the present situation to furthering their own interests.\nTo: The Ambassador\n\nFrom: E. T. Crain\n\nSubject: Dr. Portell Vila warns Embassy that Cuban left-wingers are trying to bring Communists into the party.\n\nDr. Portell Vila called today at the Embassy and during the course of the conversation spoke of his grave preoccupation regarding the efforts of Cuban left-wingers to bring Communists into the party.\n\nHe stated that Pardo Llada, Eduardo Torroja, Florentino Antu\u00f1a, Max Lerner and others were trying to get Communists into the Christian party. He said that, specifically, they were trying to get the notorious Communist, Salvador G\u00f3mez Ag\u00fcero, not only into the Christian party but to run as an Christian candidate for senator. He said that a group of Cuban left-wingers approached him on the matter to learn his views and he told them he would resist such a move with all his strength.\n\nPortell Vila said he considered the matter so urgent that he at once wrote an article entitled \"The Communist\" which he was going to try to get into El Mundo of January 29 instead of Wednesday the 30th which is the day of the week when his column usually appears. He said this would be an extension of his article published January 20 in El Mundo.\n\nI told Portell Vila that while the Embassy maintained a strict neutral attitude in the matter of Cuban politics, it would have a very deep interest in anything pertaining to the Communists when we considered an enemy common to all free countries and free national political parties. I congratulated him on his efforts to keep Communists out of his own Christian party and wished him every success in this undertaking. I said I assumed that if the party announced notorious Communists as Christian candidates for office that the party would probably lose a lot of support from persons who did not wish to be associated with Communists. I added that I hoped my assumption was not mere wishful thinking. He stated that it was definitely not wishful thinking. He stated that it was definitely not wishful thinking and that to exactly what would happen. He said that he would nevertheless oppose the efforts of Pardo Llada and company with all the strength at his command, regardless of whether an association with Communists was or lost votes for the Christian party.\nDr. Portela Villa indicated that he would try to keep me informed of developments within the Mexican party in so far as they related to the Communist. I thanked him, indicating that my sole interest in the matter was the general threat of Communism to all free nations and particularly Communist success or failure in infiltrating into democratic political parties.\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nFrom: Havana, Cuba\n\nReport No: TIC-1266, Local File No: 30-348\n\nNo. of Pages: 5\n\nNo. of Copies: 1\n\nDistribution: Wash 1\n\nOrally to:\n\nNo other distribution.\n\nSource: Cryptov: Antikar\n\nReferences: ID-777, TIC-1266\n\nSource, Operational Data, and Comments:\n\nOur TIC-1266 tried to answer as fully as possible\nID-777 but it was realized that time that more complete in-\nformation on the Juventud Socialista would be appreciated by\nHeadquarters. Antikar, therefore, was requested to supply us\nwith information which we felt equivalent had not supplied\npreviously. The attached report confirms partial information\npreviously supplied by Antikar and supplies additional in-\nformation of interest.\n\nFILE IN 201-209258\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nSUBJECT: Further Information on the Juventud Socialista.\n\nREPORT NO.: 261-1365.\n\nDATE OF INFORMATION: 2 Jan 51.\n\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Havana, Cuba.\n\nDATE ACQUIRED: 4 Jan 51.\n\nEVALUATION: P-3.\n\nDATE OF REPORT: 22 Jan 51.\n\nSOURCE: Controlled American.\n\n1. The PSP (Partido Socialista Popular, Cuban Communist Party) high command maintains continued interest in a very large degree in the Juventud Socialista organization. One of the principal tasks of the communist party is to maintain the direction of a strong communist youth movement which will respond only to the ideological foundation of the communist party. In the PSP, the most persistent voice of this communist principle is that of Dr. Roca, who takes a personal interest in the direction of the Juventud Socialista and constantly watches over its activities through trusted lieutenants. Many of the present leaders of the PSP were formerly leaders of the Juventud Socialista, the former Juventud Socialista. Men of this type are Severo Ag\u00fcero, Ag\u00fcero Su\u00e1rez, and Osvaldo M\u00e1rquez, prominent PSP members in Camag\u00fcey Province. On its own part, the Juventud Socialista maintains a close liaison with the National Executive Committee of the PSP through its leader, Flavio Ravo, who attends the weekly meetings of the National Committee.\n\n2. The caliber of the Juventud Socialista direction is high. Its leaders are militant communists and many members of the Juventud Socialista National and Provincial Committees have been political candidates for various government offices in past elections. Second to Flavio Ravo in the leadership of the group is Luis A. Mart\u00ed, both of these men are political candidates in recent elections and have attended various conferences abroad. Other leaders of note are: Lionel Soto, School of Philosophy, Havana University; Bienvenido Mart\u00ednez, a well-known political leader; Pedro P\u00e9rez, a well-known political leader; and Geovina Villar, all children of the well-known communist leader, C\u00e9sar Villar, who are educated in Russia; Julio Acosta, Bienvenido Su\u00e1rez, Rafael V\u00e1zquez Vivas; Ram\u00f3n Calzada, Juventud Socialista member from the Villas Province; Eidel D\u00edaz, of Oriente Province; and F. P. (Fm) of the printing section of the Juventud Socialista. Other youth leaders not members of the Juventud Socialista but closely tied up with their activities are: Alfredo Guti\u00e9rrez, Enrique V\u00e1zquez, Luis Arag\u00f3n, and E. P. (Fm) of the Ortodox Party, and Humberto L. Apalacio, President of the Juventud of the PAU (Partido Acci\u00f3n Unitaria) and Director of the newspaper, Vanguardia Unitaria.\n3. The structure of the Juventud Socialista is like that of the PSP. It has committees in all the districts (barrios) of the City of Habana and in the larger cities of the interior. Up until now the Juventud Socialista has not had, according to source, clandestine leaders to take the place of the present overt leaders in case the party is outlawed, nor does it now have these clandestine leaders. However, source feels that there are many secondary and less well-known leaders within the Juventud Socialista who would be able to assume the direction of a clandestine communist youth organization if the PSP decided such an organization should be set up. Source supplies the following names as possible clandestine leaders of such an organization: Juli\u00e1n Acosta, \"Juventud Socialista\" (youth representative) of the CTC (Confederaci\u00f3n de Trabajadores de Cuba) (Communist) a few years ago; Bienvenido Garc\u00eda, who is the \"reasonable\" Juventud of the CTC (Communist) at present; Federico, Pita, and Georgina Vila, Habana University; and Hector Camacho, communist youth leader at the Ariguana textile plant in Santa, Habana Province.\n\n4. The FIDIO Administrative's anti-communist attitude over the past six months has not visibly affected unfavorably the unity of the Juventud Socialista, according to source. Source gives as an example the fact that the ranks of the Juventud Socialista are composed of proven communist militant youths. Source claims he knows of only one case of defection from the Juventud Socialista ranks, that of a youth named Elito Capestany, Juventud Socialista leader in the Escuela de Artes y Oficios, who has joined the Communist Party.\n\nCurrent: As is well known, in other communist parties under similar circumstances and as we have previously reported, some communists have been instructed to infiltrate other political parties. It is difficult to understand how source can conclude positively that the Capestany case was one of defection from the Juventud Socialista.\n\n5. It is true, however, that the PSP has examined very carefully the ranks of the Juventud Socialista for signs of bourgeois weakness. The barrio committees of the PSP established similar committees of the Juventud Socialista with the purpose\nin mind of gaining new members for the party as a whole. The methods by which they tried to attract new members for the Juventud Socialista were made up of sewing clubs for girls, English classes, parlor games, and, from time to time, dances. This method had good results as far as getting the youth to draw closer to the Juventud Socialista; however, racial feeling militated against the complete success of this method for many white girls found that they were expected to mix and dance with Negroes, which was against their personal convictions. As a result of this racial prejudice, the majority of Negro girls among the Juventud Socialista ranks is noticeable. The FSP has now managed to purify the ranks of the Juventud Socialista in preparation for a harder life ahead. The former sewing circles, parlor games, and dances have disappeared and in their place entertainment less conducive to stirring up racial prejudice, such as excursions into the country, etc., are taking place. Today, the Juventud Socialista ranks can more or less be counted upon to act in a united fashion for the good of the FSP and to follow the orders of their leaders.\n\n6. Although there are no official figures on the membership of the Juventud Socialista, sources use as a yardstick the fact that on one occasion Flavio Rivas stated that there were more than 15,000 socialist youths in the nation and that of these more than 10,000 were in the city of Havana. Source believes that there is probably an overlap between a member of the Juventud Socialista who is of voting age and also affiliates with the FSP during elections. Taking into account this duplication of membership, source believes that the 15,000 figure is correct.\n\n7. The present activities of the Juventud Socialista are listed as follows:\n\nA. The most important job of the Juventud Socialista is its support of the peace-partisans' movement. This consists of direct demonstrations, making signs for various parades, collecting signatures, etc.\n\nB. The Juventud Socialista constantly tries to maintain good relations with other political youth organizations, such as the Juventud del PUE, of the Orthodox, and of the Aut\u00e9nticos libres. The Juventud Socialista also tries to influence\nand keep friends with the FEU (Federaci\u00f3n Estudiantil Universitaria) of Havana University, the Masonic youth known as the AJLP, and various schools and universities throughout the island.\n\nC. They carried out certain demonstrations or propaganda in support of the communist \"Plan Cubano contra la Crisis\" and the \"Conferencia en Defensa de la Memoria Nacional.\"\n\n8. In a national committee meeting of the PJP in June 1950 the directors of the party recommended that the Juventud Socialista spend its energy on the following assignments:\n\nA. To work through peasant associations - or organize such associations where they did not exist - in an effort to get such groups to support the partisans of peace movement.\n\nB. Make similar efforts among the negroes, intelligentsia, factories, schools, etc.\n\nC. To explain to these masses that the U.S.S is standing for peace along with the popular democracies and China and to demonstrate that the imperialist U.S. stands for war.\n\nD. Unite the peasants to the right of the working-class movement against the PNP Government and imperialism. The Juventud Socialista should understand that the most important task of all is to perpetuate and further the partisans of peace movement.\n\n9. Recent activities of the Juventud Socialista have been concerned with objections to the U.N. entering into the Korean problem and the printing and distribution of their new peer-age magazine, Casasahel. The Juventud Socialista has participated in the past and now participates in worker activities, distributing manifestos, attending parades, etc. Sometimes they have fought with the Movimiento Juvenil de la CTC (Government) or with elements of the Acci\u00f3n Revolucionaria Guiteras (ARG) in certain parades or to protect their propaganda signs, etc.\n\n10. Placido MUNO in his position as leader of the Juventud Socialista maintains constant contact with youth leaders of the Orthodoxos, PAU, Aut\u00e9nticos Libres, AJLP, various student leaders, and protestant religious youth groups. Apart from this, source\ndoes not supply any indication that EAMO carries on clandestine liaison with or penetration activities into other youth groups.\n\n11. The Comisi\u00f3n Juvenil of the CTC (Communist) is the same type of organization as the Juventud Socialista but with a different name. The only difference between these two is that the Juventud Socialista is a well-organized unit with a definite membership, whereas the Comisi\u00f3n Juvenil is under the direction of the CTC (Communist) and its membership is mainly made up of Juventud Socialista members with non-communist youths forming the balance. The head of the Comisi\u00f3n Juvenil of the CTC (Communist) is Eleonora S\u00e1nchez, a Negro, with his deputies, H\u00e9ctor CARBONELL and Julio LACADO, also Negroes. The official statements and acts of these men are guided and directed by Carlos F. RUIZ DE LA RUA, one of the communist leaders of the CTC. The activities of the Comisi\u00f3n Juvenil are limited mainly to parades and demonstrations of the CTC itself and they do not have an organized existence in the same manner as the Juventud Socialista. Membership of the Comisi\u00f3n Juvenil is on a much more reduced scale than that of the Juventud Socialista.\nSTATE DEPT DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 22 JUNE 1949\n\nCLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED\n\nSUBJECT: PROPOSED CUBAN NATIONAL CONGRESS FOR PEACE AND DEMOCRACY\n\nSTATE FILE NO: NO. 486, AMERICAN EMBASSY, HAVANA, CUBA\n**PERSONALITY (201) FILE REQUEST**\n\n**SECTION I**\n\n| NAME | SEX | NAME VARIANT |\n|------|-----|--------------|\n| Lesnick-Menendez, Max | M | |\n\n**SECTION II**\n\n| COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE | ACTION DESE | SECOND COUNTRY INTEREST | THIRD COUNTRY INTEREST |\n|-----------------------|-------------|-------------------------|------------------------|\n|                       |             |                         |                        |\n\n**SECTION III**\n\n| COMMENTS |\n|----------|\n| Punched |\n\n**INSTRUCTIONS:** Form must be typed or printed in block letters.\n\n**SECTION I:** List 201 number, name and identifying data in the spaces provided. All known aliases and variants (including maiden name, if applicable) must be listed. If the identifying data varies with the alias used, a separate form must be used. Write UNKNOWN for items you are unable to complete.\n\n**SECTION II:** List cryptonym or pseudonym, if assigned. If true name is sensitive, obtain 201 number from 201 Control Desk and complete Section I and Section III. Use a separate form, enter the 201 number and complete Section II and Section III. Submit each form separately.\n\n**SECTION III:** To be completed in all cases.\nFBI DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 31 DECEMBER 1973\n\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\n\nSUBJECT: MAX LESNICK, AKA MAX HIKARO LESNICK-MENENDEZ\n\nFBI FILE NO: 105-3492 (MIAMI)\nSECRET\n\nDO DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201 DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE.\nPERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCUMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM IP/FILES.\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M\n201-0733547\n12 DEC 73\nLX-03850\n\nAMFREE-1 (classified as good source with retentive memory) was in Cuba from 59-64 (free) and in prison from 64-mid-73, charged with illegally attempting to leave the country - got 9 yrs. He 54 yrs old, Am. cit., turned over to FBI Nov 73.\n\nSrc said LESNICK was an officer with Fidel and as of 2 Aug 73 was in Miami working for magazine Replica - src described Lesnick as \"red as a beet\". When he returned Miami from Cuba, he contacted by Lesnick who wanted to write an article for magazine - src later got anonymous phone call telling him Lesnick dangerous and not to go to interview - he didn't.\n\nDATE 10 JAN 74\n09050053\n\nSECRET\nEZ IMPDET CL BY 054979\n201-209258\nFFI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 1973\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: DIRECTORIO REVOLUCIONARIO (DR)\nFFI FILE NO: 105-20202 (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 8 NOVEMBER 1973\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: DIRECTORIO REVOLUCIONARIO (DR)\nFFI FILE NO: 105-20202 (MIAMI)\nFBI DOCUMENTS.\n\nDATE: 25 SEPTEMBER 1969.\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN.\nSUBJECT: ROJANDO ARCARIO NASFERRER POJAS\nFBI FILE NO: 2-156 (MIAMI).\n\nDATE: 15 OCTOBER 1968.\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN.\nSUBJECT: UNKNOWN SUBJECT, AKA: COMMITTEE OF CUBANS FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE UNITY OF THE EXILE.\nFBI FILE NO: 105-16515 (MIAMI).\n**United States Department of Justice**\n\n**Immigration and Naturalization Service**\n\n**Director, Central Intelligence Agency**\n\n2430 E Street, N.W.,\nWashington, D.C. 20505\n\nAttention: Deputy Director, Plans\n\nPlease furnish any derogatory information that may be contained in your files concerning the following person.\n\n**FBI Ident. Number:** None\n\n**Last Name:** Lesnick\n**Middle Name:** Menendez\n**First Name:** Max Edgardo\n\n**Date of Birth:** September 8, 1930\n\n**Place of Birth:** San Antonio de las Vueltas, Las Villas, Cuba\n\n**Present Nationality:** Cuba\n\n**If Married, Widowed, or Divorced:** Give full name and date and place of birth of spouse or former spouse. Include wife's maiden name. Give dates and places of all marriages or divorces.\n\nMirlam Alvarez-Digal; dob March 26, 1932 Havana, Cuba; married December 29, 1955 Havana, Cuba; same address.\n\n**Parents:**\n- **Father:** Lesnick, Samuel; 7-23-03 Polonia; res. Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.\n- **Mother:** Menendez, Maria Teresa; 2-23-10 Las Villas, Cuba; res. Miami, Florida\n\n**Organizations:**\n- Federation Estudiantil Univ. Havana, Cuba, 1949-51\n- Ortopedico Varity, Director, Juventud Ortopedico, 1951, 1957-60\n- Segundo Frente de la Sierra del Escambray, Natl. Secy, 1957-60\n\n**Residence Last 15 Years:**\n- 2122 SW 22nd Terrace, Miami, Florida, Feb 1967 - Present\n- 1236 SW 22nd Ave., Miami, Florida, Dec 1961 - Feb 1967\n- 960 SW 10th Court, Miami, Fla., Sep 1961 - Dec 1961\n- 16th Ave., 2-B Sta., Miami, Fla., July 1961 - Sep 1961\n- 1332 NW 2nd Street, Miami, Fla., Jun 1961 - July 1961\n- 1332 NW 2nd Street, Miami, Fla., Jun 1961 - Jul 1961\n\n**Employment:**\n- Unemployed, Miami, Florida, Present\n- Self employed, WMIE Radio Station, NewsComentator, Miami, Feb 1965 - Apr 1967\n- Cadena Oriental de Radio, and Radio Periodico El Nacional, Diario Nacional, Havana, Cuba, Feb 1959 - Sep 1960\n\n**Last Admission to U.S.:**\n- 01-26-61 KEY: 212(4)(5)\n\n**U.S. Passport No.:** 261-72-9903\n\n**Social Security No.:** 261-72-9903\n\n**Reason for Request:**\n- Perm. Res. Investigation\n\n**Army Forces Serial No.:**\n- 105-1510\n- 105-2492\n- 105-2489\n- 105-2424\n- 64869 San Antonio 3-50-61\n\n**For Agency Reply:**\n- All to CSCI-3/761, dated 27 March 1961\n- Subject: Lesnick Menendez, Max\n\n**Central Intelligence Agency**\n\n(3)\n**United States Department of Justice**\n\n**Immigration and Naturalization Service**\n\n**Applicant's Name:** Lesnick Max Edward\n\n**Date of Birth:** 09/08/30\n\n**Nationality:** Cuban\n\n**Alien Registration No.:** 45-64529\n\n**City and Country of Birth:** Villas, Lpa, Villa\n\n**Social Security No.:** 12-12-12\n\n**Family Name:** Lesnick\n\n**First Name:** Max\n\n**Date of Birth:** 09/08/30\n\n**City and Country of Birth:** Villas, Lpa, Villa\n\n**Father's Name:** Lesnick\n\n**Mother's Name:** Lesnick\n\n**Spouse's Name:** (If None, So State)\n\n**First Name:** Lesnick\n\n**Date of Birth:** 09/08/30\n\n**City and Country of Birth:** Villas, Lpa, Villa\n\n**Place of Marriage:**\n\n**Date and Place of Marriage:**\n\n**Applicant's Residence Last Five Years:**\n\n| Street and Number | City | Province or State | Country | From Month | Year | To Month | Year | Present Time |\n|-------------------|------|-------------------|---------|------------|------|----------|------|--------------|\n| 123 Main St.      | City | Province          | Country | 10/01/57   | 1957 | 11/01/57 | 1957 | Present      |\n\n**Lesnick Menendez Max Edward**\n\n**Applicant's Employment Last Five Years:**\n\n| Full Name and Address of Employer | Occupation | From Month | Year | To Month | Year | Present Time |\n|----------------------------------|------------|------------|------|----------|------|--------------|\n| 123 Main St.                     |            | 10/01/57   | 1957 | 11/01/57 | 1957 | Present      |\n\n**Last Foreign Residence of More Than One Year:**\n\n| City | Country | From Month | Year | To Month | Year | City | Country |\n|------|---------|------------|------|----------|------|------|---------|\n|      |         | 01/01/57   | 1957 | 12/31/57 | 1957 |      |         |\n\nThis form is submitted in connection with application for:\n\n- Naturalization\n- Adjustment of Status\n- Other (Specify)\n\n**Signature of Applicant or Petitioner:**\n\n**Date:**\n\n**Signature:**\n\n**Note:** False sworn statements are punishable by law for knowingly and willfully making a false statement or concealing a material fact.\nDATE: 18 AUGUST 1946\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: PARTIDO DE LA REVOLUCION (PR)\nFBI FILE NO.: 105-10748 (MIAMI)\nSECRET\n\nPRIORITY DIR CITE WAVE 675P\nNO NMAC\n\n1. FULL INITIAL INFO RE MAX LESNIK ROLE IN SURFACING OF CUBAN DELEGATION TO UN PRESS RELEASE RE TEXT 12 OCT CUBAN GOVT NOTE TO U.S. GOVT. PRIMARY SOURCE IS AMLINK 1 SOME CONFIRMATORY DATA FROM AMOS.\n\n2. MORNING 19 OCT MAX LESNIK MENENDEZ 201-209258 WAS IN OFFICES SEGUNDO FREnte NACIONAL DE ESCAMBAY (SFNE) WHEN MAIL RECEIVED. INCLUDED WAS PLAIN MANILA ENVELOPE SENT AIRMAIL, NO ADDRESS SEEN. ADDRESSED ONLY TO STREET ADDRESS, WITH SNFE NAME NOT APPEARING. ENVELOPE OPENED TO ENVELOPE WHICH CONTAINED COPIES OLD CASTRO AND CUBA ARA SPEECHES PLUS TYPED COPY OF TYPE D \"PRESS RELEASE\" OR \"FOR\" HEADED CUBA MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS, THREE-PAGE SPANISH LONGFORM TEXT.\n\n3. LESNIK BEGAN TRY DETERMINE IF OTHER EXILE GROUPS OR AMERICAN PRESS ELEMENTS HAD RECEIVED COPIES RELEASE. CHECKS WITH USIA, AP, TIME WERE NEGATIVE. PASSED LESNIK QUERY JORGE VOLSKY OF USIA (WHO NOW HAS CHANGED HIS STRINGER ALLEGIANCE FROM NEW YORK TIMES TO NY TIMES HERALD.\n\n201-209258\n21 OCT 65\nTRIBUNE PHONED MIAMI COORDINATOR CUBAN AFFAIRS WHO REPLIED HAD NO\nKNOWLEDGE MATTER. VOLSKY THEN PHONED BARNARD COLLIER NYHT LATIN\nAMERICAN CORRESPONDENT WHO CHECKED BY PHONE WITH CUBAN UN DELEGATION.\nPERSON WHO ANSWERED PHONE, APPARENTLY A SECRETARY, CONFIRMED EXISTENCE\nOF PRESS RELEASE BUT WAS VAGUE RE POSSIBLE DISTRIBUTION. LESNIX\nREAD FROM RELEASE AND COMMENTED ON CONTENTS DURING HIS RADIO PROGRAM\nNIGHT IS OUT. COLLIER BROKE STORY IN NYHT MORNING 20 OCT.\n4. CUBAN EXILE CIRCLES SPECULATE THAT PERSON WITHIN OR HAVING\nCONTACT WITH CUBAN UN MISSION STOLE COPY OF RELEASE AND SENT IT\nANONYMOUSLY TO SFNE. NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THIS OR ANY OTHER THEORY\nSECRET\nCFN 636 MAX LESNIX UN 12 U.E. ANSLINA I AMOT 19 201 209258\nSEGUNDO FREnte NACIONAL DE ESCAMOSAY SFNE SFNE NOT APPEARING DIEGO\nMEDINA CASTRO GUEVARA D SPANISH USIA AP TIME JORGE VOLSKY USIA NEW IOWA\nTIMES NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE MIAMI NO KNOWLEDGE VOLSKY BARNARD\nCOLLIER NYHT LATIN AMERICAN CUBAN UN 19 OCT COLLIER NYHT 20 OCT\nUN SFNE NO EVIDENCE\nBT\nSECRET 1960812\nDIR CITE WAVE 5089\nTYPIC AMKNOB AMRAZZ AMOT\nREF DIR 31265\n\n1. AMRAZZ/1 DISCREETLY SOUNDED EXILE COMMUNITY WAVE AREA ON\nREF ROMS WITH FOLLOWING RESULTS:\n\nA. IDEN A TOLD AMRAZZ/1 ON 7 AUG 65 THAT AMJAG/7 (201-209258)\nHAD RECENTLY SAID THAT CONFLICTING REPORTS (NATURE AND MEDIUM NOT\nSPECIFIED) ISSUED BY KUBARK AND ODDEAT RE DOMINICAN CRISIS RESULTED\nIN DOWNGRADING KUBARK, AND SINCE CRISIS IT RUMORED (NOT SPECIFIED\nBY WHOM) ODDEAT WOULD BE SUBSTITUTED ANY MOMENT FOR KUBARK IN\nHANDLING PBRUMEN PROBLEM. IDEN A ADDED HE SURE AMJAG/7 EMPLOYED\nBY KUBARK AND ASSUMED HE GOT INFO FROM HIS KUBARK CONTACT.\n\n(WAVE COMMENT) IN BOTH DAILY RADIO PROGRAM (IDEN B) AND NEWSPAPER\n(IDEN C) HE RUNS, IDEN A HAS CONSISTENTLY FOLLOWED ANTI KUBARK LINE\nSET BY AMBANG/1 INCLUDING HINTS THAT KUBARK BEING BASED OUT OF\nPBRUMEN OPS; IN MEET WITH AMRAZZ/1, IDEN A PRESUMABLY USED AMJAG/7\nNAME WHO HIGHLY RESPECTED ORDER LEND CREDENCE TO RUMOR AND THREW\nAMJAG/7-KUBARK TIE FOR MORE WEIGHT. AMJAG/7 CONSIDERED VERY.\n\nSECRET\n\n201-209257\n17 Aug 65\n\n201-352352\nSECRET\n\nSECRET, BELIEVED NOT KNOWN IN EXILE COMMUNITY AS HAVING ANY KUBARK TIES.\n\nB. AMTRUNK/1 (201-352252) TOLD AMRAZZ/1 10 AUG 82 OF UNSPECIFIED RUMORS IN EXILE COMMUNITY RE POSSIBLE ODBeat TAKEOVER OF ANTI PBRUMEN ACTIVITIES. TIME AND EXTENT ODBeat TAKEOVER NOT KNOWN. AMTRUNK/1 SEES NO DRASTIC CHANGE EVEN IF RUMOR TRUE BUT SAID HE NOTICED GRADUAL DECREASE KUBARK PERSONNEL IN AREA SINCE FALL AMBIDDY/1 AND CORRESPONDING INCREASE ODBeat AGENTS. ADDED HE PERSONALLY KNEW PBRUMEN IN AREA EMPLOYED BY ODBeat BUT DECLINED PROVIDE NAMES. (WAVE COMMENTS: MANY MEMBERS AMWORLD ALLUDED TO NO CLAIMED KUBARK STATUS. DECREASE THESE TYPES SINCE DISANDMENT AMWORLD COULD ACCOUNT FOR ALLEGED REDUCTION NUMBER KUBARK AGENTS WAVE AREA.)\n\n2. WAVE FEELS RUMORS GENERATED SOME EXTENT BY AX-GRINDERS LIKE IDENA AND BY OPPORTUNISTS HOPING FOR OVERALL CHANGE WHICH MIGHT ENABLE THEM GAIN ODYOKO SUPPORT FOR OWN PERSONAL AIDS. NEWSPAPER IDENA CONTRIBUTED TO START OF RUMORS BY PLAYING UP ODENVY \"INVESTIGATION\" KUBARK ACTIVITIES SANTO DOMINGO AND HINTING NEW CHIEF KUBARK INDICATED PHASE OUT CIVILIAN CONTROL ANTI-PBRUMEN OPS.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFN 5089 31065 AMRAZZ/1 RQMS A AMRAZZ/1 7 65 AMJAG/7 201-209258\n\nNOT SPECIFIED KUBARK ODBeat RE DOMINICAN NOT SPECIFIED PBRUMEN\nAMJAG/7 B C A ANTI AMBANG/1 OPS AMRAZZ/1 A AMJAG/7 AMJAG/7\nNOT KNOWN AMTRUNK/1 201-352252 AMRAZZ/1 10 NOT KNOWN AMTRUNK/1\nNO DRASTIC AMFIDY/1 AMWORLD AMWORLD AX-GRINDERS A ODYKE D\nODENY SANTO DOMINGO OPS\nBT\nSECRET 1900612\n\nDIR CITE WAVE 5090\n\nTYPIC AMKNOE A RAZZ AMOT\n\nREF WAVE 5089 (35072)\n\nIDEN A: MAX EDGARDO LESNIX MENENDEZ (201-209258).\n\nIDEN B: \"REPLICA\" PROGRAM DAILY 1845-1900 HRS, WMIE.\n\nIDEN C: REPLICA NEWSPAPER\n\nIDEN D: PATRIA NEWSPAPER, BATISTIANO WEEKLY.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFN 5090 5089 A MAX EDGARDO LESNIX MENENDEZ 201-209258 B \"REPLICA\" 1845-1900 HRS WMIE C REPLICA D PATRIA BATISTIANO WEEKLY\n\nBT\n\nSECRET\n\nB 201-352252\n\n201-209258\n\n19 Aug 65\nFBI DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 29 JANUARY 1965\n\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\n\nSUBJECT: SECOND NATIONAL FRONT OF ESCAMBAY (SNFE)\n\nFBI FILE NO: 105-6243 (MIAMI)", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10173-10170.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 102, "total-input-tokens": 116623, "total-output-tokens": 39358, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 0, 1], [0, 1299, 2], [1299, 3195, 3], [3195, 4512, 4], [4512, 5572, 5], [5572, 7269, 6], [7269, 7563, 7], [7563, 8991, 8], [8991, 10527, 9], [10527, 12052, 10], [12052, 12052, 11], [12052, 14415, 12], [14415, 17010, 13], [17010, 19577, 14], [19577, 21439, 15], [21439, 23157, 16], [23157, 24307, 17], [24307, 24604, 18], [24604, 25695, 19], [25695, 26439, 20], [26439, 26819, 21], [26819, 27832, 22], [27832, 30213, 23], [30213, 32672, 24], [32672, 32672, 25], [32672, 33103, 26], [33103, 34132, 27], [34132, 34319, 28], [34319, 36903, 29], [36903, 39183, 30], [39183, 40180, 31], [40180, 42923, 32], [42923, 46041, 33], [46041, 46574, 34], [46574, 48637, 35], [48637, 50899, 36], [50899, 51590, 37], [51590, 51833, 38], [51833, 53918, 39], [53918, 55993, 40], [55993, 56756, 41], [56756, 56869, 42], [56869, 56869, 43], [56869, 57699, 44], [57699, 59179, 45], [59179, 61911, 46], [61911, 64919, 47], [64919, 65185, 48], [65185, 65185, 49], [65185, 65185, 50], [65185, 67194, 51], [67194, 67726, 52], [67726, 70265, 53], [70265, 70496, 54], [70496, 72960, 55], [72960, 73701, 56], [73701, 74123, 57], [74123, 76969, 58], [76969, 80157, 59], [80157, 80515, 60], [80515, 81751, 61], [81751, 84252, 62], [84252, 85922, 63], [85922, 86424, 64], [86424, 88210, 65], [88210, 88365, 66], [88365, 90274, 67], [90274, 92147, 68], [92147, 94131, 69], [94131, 97622, 70], [97622, 101055, 71], [101055, 103629, 72], [103629, 106271, 73], [106271, 107014, 74], [107014, 109432, 75], [109432, 112340, 76], [112340, 113158, 77], [113158, 115409, 78], [115409, 115775, 79], [115775, 116497, 80], [116497, 119080, 81], [119080, 121319, 82], [121319, 123554, 83], [123554, 125583, 84], [125583, 126756, 85], [126756, 126947, 86], [126947, 128131, 87], [128131, 128284, 88], [128284, 129357, 89], [129357, 129617, 90], [129617, 129617, 91], [129617, 129933, 92], [129933, 132206, 93], [132206, 134267, 94], [134267, 134386, 95], [134386, 135399, 96], [135399, 136412, 97], [136412, 137460, 98], [137460, 138706, 99], [138706, 138913, 100], [138913, 139356, 101], [139356, 139497, 102]]}}
{"id": "25a40d604505967eccc4f6a8b443fceb1cea979b", "text": "MATERIAL REVIEWED AT CIA HEADQUARTERS BY\nHOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF MEMBERS\n\nFILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: LESTICK MAX\n201-209255\nVOL. II\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY: THIRD AGENCY DOCUMENT\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 10:05         | 12:10         | Betsy Palmer             | Betsy Palmer (Authenticated)   |\n| 9/4/78        | 9/7/78        | Pat Orr                  | Pat Orr                        |\n| 11/6/78       |               |                          |                                |\n|               |               |                          |                                |\n|               |               |                          |                                |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nSECRET\n\nDEFERRED TELEPOUCH\n\nACTION: OG/PCD-7 (850) INFO: ODPO-D, RF, FILE, DORECORD. (10/M)\n\n79 1972436\nPAGE 001\nTOR: 0918422 FEB 79\nSOM 20190\n\nSECRET 0917482 FEB 79 DEFERRED TELEPOUCH\n\nCITE SANTO DOMINGO 20190\n\nTO: WASHINGTON,\n\nFOR: LA/COG INFO LA/CARIB,\n\nSUBJECT: WNIINTEL FGI EMPYREX TRACE\n\n1. EMPYREX (LIAISON) REQUESTS TRACESON MAX L E S N I C K\n   MENENDEZ BORN 8 SEPT 1930, HAVANA, CUBA; JOURNALIST WHO IS\n   REQUESTING VISA TRAVEL DOM REP FOR BUSINESS TRIP. SUBJECT APPEARS\n   TO BE IDENTICAL WITH MAX EDGARDO L E S N I C K MENENDEZ (201-209258),\n   CUIS PRINTOUT NO. 151438. STATION TRACES CONTAINED UFG-01709,\n   20 OCT 62 AND UFG-03590, 10 SEPT 63, INDICATE LESNICK ANTI-CASTRO\n   CUBAN EXILE BROADCASTER AND STATION IS PERPLEXED SUBJECT'S\n   INCLUSION IN CUIS.\n\n2. INDEX: LESNICK, FILE: 201-209258, RVW 9 FEB 09,\n   DRY 0981.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nDO DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201\nDOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE.\nPERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCU-\nMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL\nINFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED\nFROM IP/FILES.\n\nLESNIX, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M\n200-CC6-495/18\nDATE-01586\n13 JAN 78\nTREA\nP3\n\nDIRECTOR AND PUBLISHER OF REPLICA, A SPANISH\nMAGAZINE PRINTED IN MIAMI.\nATTENDED MEETING FOR PURPOSE OF ORGANIZING A\nSECRET ANTI-CASTRO GROUP.\n\nDATE 06 FEB 78\n09517279\n\n201-209258\n\nSECRET\nEZ IMPRINT CL BY 054979\nCABLES FROM: DIRECTOR, FBI\n\nDATE: 16 NOVEMBER 1977\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nSUBJECT: CUBAN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES IN THE U.S.; FBI - CUBA\n\nDATE: 6 AUGUST 1977\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nSUBJECT: WILD STALLION; INTERNAL SECURITY - CUBA-PANAMA\n**Biographic Information**\n\n| Last Name | First Name | Date of Birth | City and Country of Birth | Place of Marriage |\n|-----------|------------|---------------|---------------------------|------------------|\n| Lesnick   | Max        | 9/2/30        | Voelitz, Cuba             |                  |\n| Menendez  |            |               |                           |                  |\n\n**Father**\n\n| Last Name | First Name | Date of Birth | City and Country of Birth | Place of Marriage |\n|-----------|------------|---------------|---------------------------|------------------|\n| Lesnick   |            | 1903          | Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic |                  |\n| Menendez  | Teresa     | 1910          | Miami, Fla                |                  |\n\n**Former Husbands or Wives**\n\n| Last Name | First Name | Date of Birth | City and Country of Birth | Place of Marriage |\n|-----------|------------|---------------|---------------------------|------------------|\n| Alvarez   | Miriam     | 8/26/32      | Havana, Cuba              | Havana, Cuba     |\n\n**Applicant's Residence Last Five Years**\n\n| Street and Number | City | Province or State | Country | From | To |\n|-------------------|------|-------------------|---------|------|----|\n| 5530 Sardina      | C. Gables | Fla | U.S.A. | Jan 75 | |\n| 1730 Pizarro      | C. Gables | Fla | U.S.A. | Jan 73 | Jan 75 |\n| 2122 S.W. 22 Terr.| Miami | Fla | U.S.A. | March 66 | Jan 73 |\n\n**Applicant's Last Address Outside the United States of More Than One Year**\n\n| Street and Number | City | Province or State | Country | From | To |\n|-------------------|------|-------------------|---------|------|----|\n| Banos 205         | Havana | Havana | Cuba | 56 | Jan 61 |\n\n**Applicant's Employment Last Five Years**\n\n| Full Name and Address of Employer | Occupation | From | To |\n|-----------------------------------|------------|------|----|\n| 2994 N.W. 7 St. Miami, Fla. 33125 | President | Oct. 67 | |\n\n**Naturalization**\n\n- **Date of Naturalization**: Oct. 67\n- **Place of Naturalization**: Miami, Fla.\n\n**Other Information**\n\n- **Naturalization**: Yes\n- **Adjustment of Status**: No\n\n**Applicant:**\n\n- **Name**: Lesnick-Menendez, Max\n- **Alien Registration Number**: 012-542-416\n\n**Other Agency Use**\n\n- **INS USE (Office of Origin)**\n- **Office Code**: 1-4-6-9\n- **Type of Case**: MIA\n- **Date**: Apr 2, 1977\n- **Number**: 01-209258\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nSTAFF\n\nCONF: CAS INFO: FILE\n\nTO: PRIORITY PANAMA CITY INFO LA/MIA/MIAMI-Y\n\nUNINTEL RYSAT PERAMPART MHSPIKE Y\n\nREFS: A. DIRECTOR 934495\n\nB. DIRECTOR 933647\n\nC. PANAMA CITY 38750 [IN 076237] Y\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION (LESS 203'S) MAY BE PASSED TO THE\nITS INTERNAL 420TH FOR INFO ONLY:\n\nA. ALDO INOCENCIO VERA SERAFIN (201-0326634) DPOB\n\n28 JULY 1928, CAIBARIEN, LAS VILLAS, CUBA. FORMER UNDERGROUND LEADER\nAGAINST BATISTA 1955-59 AND PROMINENT MEMBER IN 26TH OF JULY\nMOVEMENT. HELD SEVERAL POSITIONS IN CASTRO'S EARLY REVOLUTIONARY\nGOVERNMENT INCLUDING THAT OF CHIEF OF THE TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS\nDEPARTMENT (DTI), THE MAIN INTELLIGENCE ORGAN OF THE CUBAN NATIONAL\nPOLICE. ARRIVED IN U.S. WITH WIFE AND BABY AS A REFUGEE ON 13 MARCH\n1961. ISSUED PERMANENT U.S. ALIEN REGISTRATION NO. A-12-486-223 IN\nJUNE 1965. IN 1972 MOVED TO PUERTO RICO. VERA WAS VERY ACTIVE IN\nANTI-CASTRO CUBAN EXILE GROUPS UP UNTIL THE TIME HE WAS KILLED BY UNKNOWN\nASSAINTS ON 25 OCTOBER 1976 IN SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO-Y\n\nDATE: 201-306634\n\nRECORD COPY\n\nCLASSIFICATION\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nE 2 IMPDET\n\nCL BY: ---\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nSTAFF\n\nCONF: INFO: FILE\n\nDIRECTOR\n\n936139\n\nDISSENY BY:\n\nRETURN TO PER\n\nB. MAX EDGARDO L\u00c9SNICK (201-0209258) DPOB 8 SEPT\n\n1930, VUELTAS, LAS VILLAS, CUBA. FLED TO U.S. IN JANUARY 1961. ISSUED PERMANENT U.S. ALIEN REGISTRATION NO. A-12-542-416 IN JANUARY 1961. HAS BEEN THE PUBLISHER OF THE SMALL EXILE NEWSPAPER \"REPLICA\" IN MIAMI SINCE 1963 AND A COMMENTATOR FOR A DAILY NEWS PROGRAM \"RADIO ANTI-CASTRO REPLICA\" SINCE 1964. INVOLVED WITH SEVERAL CUBAN EXILE GROUPS. Y\n\n2. ADDED INFO ONLY:\n\nA. THERE ARE NUMEROUS FBI REPORTS ON VERA AND HIS ACTIVITIES WHILE A MEMBER OF VARIOUS EXILE GROUPS AND ESPECIALLY CONCERNING VERA'S INVOLVEMENT WITH THE GROUP ACCION CUBANA (AC), WHICH IS A SMALL CUBAN EXILE TERRORIST GROUP HEADED BY ORLANDO BOSCH AVILA AND WHICH HAS CLAIMED CREDIT FOR A NUMBER OF BOMBINGS AGAINST CUBAN EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES. BHERALD HAS HAD CONTACT WITH VERA OFF-AND-ON SINCE 1964. BESIDES THE CONTACT DESCRIBED IN REF B VERA WAS BEING CONSIDERED IN 1964 FOR THE AMWORLD PROGRAM, BUT THIS DID NOT MATERIALIZE. AN INTERESTING NOTE IS FACT THAT VERA WAS REGISTERED BY THE ARMY WITH ISR FOR THE PERIODS JANUARY - JULY 1964 AND AUGUST 1964 - APRIL 1966, BOTH TIMES BEING DROPPED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Y\n\nDATE:\n\nORIG:\n\nUNIT:\n\nEXT:\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCED BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nCL BY: 007255\nB. CONCERNING LESNICK, SEVERAL FBI REPORTS INDICATE LESNICK WAS ASSOCIATED WITH ORLANDO BOSCH AND WAS INVOLVED IN AND SUPPORTED A NUMBER OF CUBAN EXILE REVOLUTIONARY GROUPS' TERRORIST ACTIVITIES. ANOTHER FBI REPORT INDICATED THAT LESNICK RECEIVED MONEY FROM PANAMA IN CONNECTION WITH NARCOTICS TRAFFIC AND ALLEGEDLY WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ARREST IN PANAMA OF GABRIEL GREGORIO RODRIGUEZ, WHO WAS SUSPECTED OF PLOTTING AGAINST THE TORRIJOS GOVERNMENT IN PANAMA. THE LATEST FBI INFO ON LESNICK RECEIVED IN SEPTEMBER 1974 REPORTED THAT LESNICK AND ORLANDO BOSCH WERE NO LONGER COOPERATING BECAUSE OF AN ARGUMENT OVER MONEY. LESNICK WAS ONCE CONTACTED BY THE HAVANA STATION IN AUGUST 1957 AS PART OF THAT STATION'S LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT OF OPS ASSETS. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF ANY FURTHER OPERATIONAL INTEREST.\n\n4. FILE: 201-0209258, 201-0326634. E2 IMPDET-A\n\nLA COMMENT: A. INDICATED TRACES ON VERA AND LESNICK WOULD FOLLOW SEPARATELY.\n\nB. INFORMED ADDRESSES OF ASSASSINATION OF VERA ON 25 OCTOBER 1976 AND GAVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY CONTACT WITH VERA.\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nSTAFF\n\nCONF: INFO: FILE\n\nDIRECTOR\n\n936139\n\nDISSENY BY:\n\n0 NOES\n\n0 RETURN TO PER\n\nC. REQUESTED TRACES ON VERA AND LESNICK AND ASKED HAS INDICATE WHAT INFO COULD BE PASSED TO THE 470TH.\n\nDC/LA/COG W. MURRAY {IN DRAFT}\n\nC/LA/CAR\n\nAC/CI/06/AT\n\nAGC/DDO\n\nPCS/LSH/MIL\n\nPCS/ITG\n\nDATE: 29 OCTOBER 1976\n\nORG: LESLIE BRUDZINSKI/PAULETTE DANCY MEH\n\nUNIT: LA/PNC/PA\n\nEXT: 1454\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCED BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PF BITED\n\nCL BY 007255\nSECRET\n\nSTAFF 2819472 DIRECTOR 934475\n\nCONF: CLA8 INFO: FILE: W/ 1/3/74 1/3/74\n\nDDD 305000 1/3/74 1/3/74 1/3/74 1/3/74 1/3/74\n\nTO: PRIORITY PANAMA CITY INFO LAMiami Y\n\nUNINTEL RYBAT HYPOCH MHSPIKE Y\n\nACD 0000 0000 0000 0000\n\nREFS: A. PANAMA CITY 38780 [IN 078745]\n\nB. PANAMA CITY 38750 [IN 076237]\n\nC. DIRECTOR 931642 Y\n\n3. HEADQUARTERS IN PROCESS OF NOTIFYING DEA OF FBI REQUEST DESCRIBED REF C. FURTHERMORE, WE RECOMMENDING TO DEA THAT SINCE ALDEREGUIA IS A REGISTERED DEA CI THEY MAY WISH INFORM FBI OF THEIR INTEREST, IF THEY HAVE NOT DONE SO ALREADY Y\n\n2. NO HEADQUARTERS TRACES ON OCHOA AND MAYO. TRACES ON ALDO VERA (201-0326634) AND MAX LESNICK (201-0209258) FOLLOW SEPARATELY MOSTLY BUT WILL BE FOR STATION USE ONLY. A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF INFO IS FROM FBI AND MAY NOT BE PASSED TO 470TH WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF FBI. BECAUSE OF NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION INVOLVED IT WOULD BE BETTER IF 470TH MADE OWN QUERY TO FBI FOR THIS INFORMATION. BELIEVE IN FUTURE THAT ANY SUCH REQUESTS FROM 470TH FOR INFORMATION SHOULD BE DIRECTED THROUGH THEIR OWN COMMUNICATIONS CHANNELS TO THE FBI SINCE WE ARE NOT AT LIBERTY TO DIVULGE TO ONE AGENCY INFORMATION\n\nDATE:\n\nORIG:\n\nUNIT:\n\nEXT:\n\nLESNICK 207\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nSECRET\n\nCL BY: IMPDET\n\nE 2\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nSTAFF\n\nCONF: INFO: FILE\n\nDIRECTOR\n\n934495\n\nDISSEM BY:\n\n0 - READ\n0 - RETURN TO PER\n\nFROM ANOTHER. MOREOVER, SINCE INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED REF B ARE U.S.\nPERSONS, DIRECT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE 470TH AND THE FBI\nPARTICULARLY DESIRABLE.\n\nFILE: 201-281197, 56-2-4, 56-8-11. E2 IMPETUOUS\n\nLA COMMENT: A. STATION ASKS IF FBI HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT ALDERGUA\nINS REGISTERED IN ISR AS SOURCE OF DEA.\n\nB. REQUESTS TRACES ON CUBAN EXILES CONNIE O CH O A,\nALDO V E R A, MAX LESNICH, AND FNU MAYO.\n\nC. NOTIFIES ADDRESSES THAT IN RESPONSE TO HEADQUARTERS\nMEMO TO FBI ON ACTIVITIES OF ALDERGUA FBI WISHES\nINITIATE DISCREET INVESTIGATION OF ALDERGUA'S\nACTIVITIES IN U.S. ADVISES HEADQUARTERS GIVING SUCH\nCONCURRENCE.\n\nDC/LA/COG U. MURRAY {IN DRAFT}\n\nPCS/LSN/ID C. ENRIGHT {IN DRAFT}\n\nPCS/LSN/MIL FRANTZ {IN DRAFT}\n\nPCS/NC N. DAVIS {IN DRAFT}\n\nREBRRBPCS/ITC P. PLUMB {IN DRAFT}\n\nAC/CI/OG/AT H. ARCHER {IN DRAFT}\n\nAGC/DDO A.E. GOLDIN {IN DRAFT}\n\nC/LA/CAR\n\nDATE: 28 OCTOBER 1976\n\nORIG: LESLIE BRUDZINSKI: MEH\n\nUNIT: LA/PNC/PA\n\nEXT: 1454\n\nC/LA\n\nCLASSIFICATION: REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\nSECRET 2021322 OCT 76 STAFF\n\nCITE: PANAMA CITY 38799\n\nTO: DIRECTOR INFO MIAMI, FL\n\nMAINTAIN HIGH PRIORITY INTEL\n\n1. On 26 October, KIEPOCH passed station copy of report on alleged Cuban exile terrorist activity from an apparently new source of origin in Miami. Report is not dated, but 26/2 date stamp indicates it was received on 22 October. Even though written, is not identified in handwritten document. It provides address and phone numbers in Miami area which should make his identification feasible. Writer appears to be proprietor of \"PASCO\" 2601 16th St., Miami, FL. Twenty-third Street, Hollywood, FL. Phone 363-7344 (office); 366-2277 (home). Additional phone 854-4231 followed by rotation (my house). We have no idea how document reached KIEPOCH, but we speculate he learned it could have brought it from Miami. The writer is a known militant (US) for his services.\n\n2. Presumably to establish his bona fides and substantiate his access to info of value to Panamanians, writer submitted lengthy report on alleged recent Cuban exile activity accompanied...\nBY LONG LIST OF CUBAN EXILE ACTIVISTS, DOCUMENT CONTAINS FAMILIAR\nALLEGATIONS OF CUBAN INVOLVEMENT IN THIS ACTIVITY. DOCUMENT STATES\nTHAT ORLANDO BOSCH IS UNDER ARREST IN VENEZUELA TOGETHER WITH LUIS\nPULIDO CARRILLES ALIAS \"EL SABIO\". BOSCH WAS TRAVELING ON COSTA\nRICAN PASSPORT AND ALSO HAD NICARAGUAN, DOMINICAN AND CHILEAN\nPASSPORTS.\n\n1. REPORT LISTS BOSCH'S CONTACTS AS \"MIGUEL P\u00c9REZ\" IN NICARAGUA\nDESCRIBED AS CLOSE TO GENERAL ANASTASIO SOTOMAYOR ORLANDO NUNEZ\nIN COSTA RICA AND MARIO RIVADILLO IN SANTO DOMINGO. POSADA IS\nDESCRIBED AS EX-NAVY, ARMY OFFICER, AND WORKED FOR VENEZUELA'S\nDIGESTO FOR EIGHT YEARS AND THEN ORGANIZED PRIVATE DETECTIVE AGENCY\nWHICH EMPLOYED OVER 1,000 MEN. POSADA, ACCORDING TO THE WRITER,\nDIRECTED ALL VIOLENT ACTIONS IN VENEZUELA AGAINST THE COMMUNISTS.\nHIS ALIAS WAS \"INSPECTOR BARRIO\" AND ALSO \"EL CALICHE\". THE RECENT\nOPERATION AGAINST THE CURAMA PLANE WAS MOUNTED BY POSADA, ASSISTED\nBY ALDO VERA. THE WRITER CONTINUES BY STATING THAT BOSCH'S RECENT\nTRIP TO VENEZUELA WAS AN ATTEMPT TO SETTLE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN\n\"ALDO'S WING\" AND CORU. BOSCH'S MISSION WAS SUCCESSFUL IF IT\nAPPEARS TRUE AND ALDO'S GROUP WILL UNITE. ALDO VERA IS REPORTEDLY\nIN PLANTATION. THE WRITER ADDS THAT ALDO VERA WILL ENTER\nVENEZUELA IN NOVEMBER 75 TO MOUNT A SERIES OF ATTACKS AGAINST CUBAN EMBASSIES IN CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA.\n\n4. IT IS NOT ENTIRELY CLEAR FROM TEXT, BUT IT SEEMS AFTER\n   1. ACCORDING TO CUBAN REPORTS, SHE WAS ORIGINALLY JAIL IN\n   CUBA, BUT ALLOWED TO TRAVEL TO PANAMA SINCE SHE HAS ALREADY SERVED\n   HER SENTENCE. SHE WOULD THEN TRAVEL FROM PANAMA TO VIETNAM\n   WHERE SHE WOULD BE OF SERVICE TO THE WRITER.\n\n5. THE WRITER CLAIMS THAT ENRIQUE ARIAS WAS ALL SET TO GO TO\n   PANAMA DURING THE RECENT UNREST THERE. ARIAS WAS TO HAVE BEEN\n   FLEETED BY JOE MENDELA, AN AMERICAN WHO IS WELL KNOWN TO CUBAN GOVERN-\n   MENT. JOE MENDELA AND ROLANDO MARTINEZ, WHO ARE IN CONTACT WITH CIA,\n   WILL INTRODUCE THE WRITER TO ARIAS AND IMPROVE WRITER'S ACCESS\n   TO ARIAS WHO IS OF INTEREST TO PANAMANIANS.\n\n6. STATION POUCHING CURRY OF ALLEGED CUBAN MAIL ACTIVISTS TO\n   ADDRESSES.\n\n7. FLIGHT 507-4/3, E2 IMPACT\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 212272 OCT 76 STAFF\n\nCITE: PANAMA CITY 38750\n\nTO: PRIORITY L/Miami Info Director,\n\nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT\n\nREF: PANAMA CITY 38750 (.......\n\n1. 470TH NIGP SUCCEEDED IN HOLDING OPS MEETING WITH SOURCE 301 NIGHT OF 19 OCT. IN COURSE OF THAT DEBRIEFING, 301 REPORTED FOLLOWING:\n\nA. HE WAS SENT ALONE TO MIAMI BY GN 5-2, LTC. NORIEGA, ON 14 OCT. RETURNED TO PANAMA NIGHT 15 OCT. HIS MISSION WAS TO CONTACT SALVADOR ALDEREGUIA TO OBTAIN INFO ON CUBAN EXILE ACTIVITY IN CONNECTION WITH SABOTAGE OF CUBANA AIRLINER OFF BARBADOS.\n\nB. 301 REACHED ALDEREGUIA THROUGH CUBAN EXILE FEMALE NAMED CONNIE OCHOA WHO FUNCTIONS AS MISTRESS TO BOTH 301 AND ALDEREGUIA. ALDEREGUIA NAMED CUBAN EXILES ALDO VERA AND (FNU) MAYO, A VETERINARIAN, AS HAVING HAD ROLE IN SABOTAGE OPERATION, BUT SAID PRINCIPAL FIGURE WAS ORLANDO BOSCH. ALDEREGUIA SAID THAT BOSCH HAD GONE TO NICARAGUA WHERE ANASTASIO SANCHEZ GAVE HIM UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT OF MONEY TO MOUNT OPERATION. BOSCH PROCEEDED...\nTO CARRIES TO CARRY IT OUT. ALDEREGUIA ALSO NAMED CUBAN EXILE\n\nC. AFTER 321 RETURNED TO PANAMA, HE WAS INVITED TO DINNER\nAT HOME OF AMADO PADRON, KNOWN CUBAN INTEL OFFICER IN CUBAN EMBASSY\nPANAMA CITY, NIGHT 16 OCT. CUBAN AMBASSADOR GARCIA WAS ALSO PRESENT.\nGARCIA PRAISED 321 EFFUSIVELY FOR PREVIOUS INFO 321 HAD PROVIDED TO\nCUBANS FROM MIAMI EXILE CONTACTS. GARCIA SAID THAT FIDEL CASTRO\nUSED IT EXTENSIVELY IN PREPARING HIS 15 OCT SPEECH.\n\nD. 321 WILL BE ASKED BY NORIEGA TO GO TO MIAMI AGAIN IN\nNEAR FUTURE, PROBABLY FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION ON SAME SUBJECT.\n\n2. IF 321 GOES TO MIAMI AGAIN 470TH WILL SEND STUDLEY TO\nMEET HIM THERE TO MONITOR HIS CONTACTS WITH EXILE COMMUNITY. CONTACT\nWITH 321 IS MUCH EASIER IN MIAMI THAN IN PANAMA. 470TH WILL INFORM\nFBI AS REQUIRED BY COORDINATION RULES. WOULD APPRECIATE MIAMI\nSTATION ASSISTANCE TO STUDLEY IF REQUIRED. MIGHT BE ESPECIALLY\nHELPFUL IF MIAMI CAN PROVIDE RAPID LOCAL TRACES ON NAMES THAT HE\nGETS FROM 321.\n\n3. STATION TRACES ON OCHOA AND MAYO NEGATIVE. NAME ALDO VERA\nIS ON CURRENT ON G-2 WATCHLIST, IDENTIFIED AS PUERTO RICAN RESIDENT\nAND \"DANGEROUS.\" DO NOT KNOW WHETHER THIS IDENTICAL TO SAME NAME.\nIN PARA 28 ABOVE I BELIEVE IT LIKELY, MAX LESNICK IS ALMOST CERTAINLY EDITOR OF \"REPLIC\" MAGAZINE IN 1974 AND SUBJECT OF LENGTHY MIAMI FBI REPORT DATED 25 SEPT 74 (FBI FILE NO. 105-3442) DEALING WITH ENMITIES WITHIN MIAMI EXILE COMMUNITY.\n\n4. REQUEST ADDRESSEE TRACES ON OCHOA, VERA, MAYO AND LESNICK. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT INFO MAY BE PASSED TO 470TH.\n\n5. FILE: 95-2-4; 201-0933219. E2 IMPDET\nSECRET 2115462 OCT 76 STAFF\n\nCITE LA/MIAI 25518\n\nTO: PRIORITY PANAMA CITY INFO DIRECTOR,\n\nW/INTEL RYBAT PERAMPAK\n\nREF: PANAMA CITY 38750 (W/076237)\n\n1. ONLY STATION TRACES ON SUBJECTS REF ARE ON ALDO WER A SERAFIN, WHO INVOLVED WITH HAITIAN/CUBAN EXILE GROUPS PLANNING INVASION OF HAITI IN 1966. (MAY PASS 472TH).\n\n2. WISH REMIND PANAMA CITY, LA/MIAI STATION RECORDS AND FILES ON CUBAN EXILES ARE VERY LIMITED AND THEREFORE ANY ASSISTANCE WE PROVIDE 472TH REPS WOULD NOT BE AS MEANINGFUL AS HQS TRACES.\n\n3. FILE: 56-2-4, 221-0933215, E2 IMPDET\nLESNIK, Max\n\nCUBA\n\nSubj reportedly in SNTO working on anti-Castro Radio program broadcast over Radio Caribe, but doubt seriously he is being considered as Director, especially in view of his Cuban nationality.\n\n(SNTO-1366, 18 Mar 63, IN-88859)\nLESNICK, MAX\nSEX M DOB 08 SEP 30\nCUBA, LAS VELAS\nCIT CUBA ?\nOCC EDITOR\nA USA\nREF UFCA-12336, 13 NOV 63\nATR USA KEY WEST FLK 26 JAN 61 REQUESTING\nPOL ASYLUM FORER RADIO PROPAGANDA CUBA,\nSTATES NOT COMMIE OR SYMPATHIZER. PUBLISHER\nAND EDITOR OF REPLICA NEWSPAPER. 001 NOV 63.\nCORS CARD WAS LESNICK, MAX MENENDEZ\nUFG.\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-209258\nSEX M DOB ?\nCIT DOMINICAN REPUBLIC\nOCC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC\nA DOMINICAN REPUBLIC\nSUBJ HAD MEETING W/SUBJ OF 201-239298\nJURE. SUBJ COMMITTED HIMSELF OFFICIALLY TO\nBEHALF OF JURE IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.\n\nLesnick, Max\n\nSubject who is on editorial staff of newspaper\nsaid that within one week the first edition\nof Replica, a four-page newspaper, will be\navailable in 5,000 copies within the Cuban\nexile community. Its format will be almost\nin tabloid form and it may appear three times\na month. The printing cost for each issue will\nbe $200.\n\nCSUB-3/657,382\n22 Oct 63\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-209258\nSEX M DOB ?\nCIT USA ?\nOCC ?\nESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEWSPAPER REPLICA\nTO COUNTERACT PRO-BATISTA PROPAGANDA IN\nTHE CUBAN EXILE COMMUNITY, THE SUBJECT\nIS AN EDITOR.\nLESNIK, M.  \n\nCuba\n\nSukij, Cuban rational, recently rumored made Chief Radio CARIBE.\n\n(WAVE-5865, (IN-87544), 16 Mar 63)\nDATE: 1 JUNE 1976\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nSUBJECT: ANTI-CASTRO ACTIVITIES - INTERNAL SECURITY - CUBA\nSBI FILE NO: NONE GIVEN\n(CABLE FROM DIRECTOR, FBI)\nmuch the stories of Horace Alger.\n\nBut not everyone in the Miami area appreciates the Cubans' accomplishments. In fact, the refugees are beginning to encounter an anti-Cuban backlash. The friction between Cubans and their \"Anglo\" neighbors is different from the problems faced by most minority groups in the nation, if only because here the Cubans have become the majority\u201452 per cent of the population in Miami, 35 per cent in suburban Hialeah. But their numbers and their success are the heart of the problem. \"I've never seen anti-Cuban feeling so bad,\" says Rafael Villaverde, a Bay of Pigs veteran turned community organizer in Little Havana. \"Before, the Cubans were competing for low-level jobs. Now they're competing for the job of bank president, corporation executive, even mayor. We are starting to step on toes.\"\n\nThe Cubans are themselves divided over the issue of U.S. defense with Castro's Cuba. More and more exiles are gung-ho about the notion of liberating Cuba at any cost. But there are those who refuse to concede defeat. Last month, that difference of opinion apparently led to a killing in Miami and the threat of more violence to come.\n\nScuffle: Much of the Ango-Cuban tension has been erupting in changing neighborhoods. In one southwest Miami community, Cuban and Anglo families have been feuding for months. In January, a shot was fired during one scuffle. \"There is a real bitterness now in many middle-class white communities,\" says Miami attorney William Coburn, especially among people who grew up here and whose neighbors are mostly Cuban. Late last year, the mayor of Hialeah, Dale Bennett, publicly denounced the fact that \"hundreds of old-timers have moved out of the Cuban community,\" warned Bennett. \"The people who have come in from Cuba don't like to take over the State of Florida and turn it into Cuba. But unfortunately for them this is America.\"\n\nMrs. Mary Ortwick, a longtime Miami resident, agrees. \"What the sign says, she complains, \"and the people refuse to speak anything but Spanish. Why should I have to learn Spanish?\"\n\nThat is one of the non-Latinos' most persistent complaints. A particular target of their outrage has been a bilingual education program requiring thousands of English-speaking children in eight elementary schools to learn Spanish. Latin students are learning English. Last November, the Anglo community rose up to elect to the school board an opponent of such programs, replacing the board's only Cuban-American member. So far, he has had no luck in getting the program curtailed, and the resentment persists.\n\nKilling: Many Cubans these days do not go as innocently as they once did to the notion of going back to a liberated Cuba. \"Morally, we are still at war with Castro,\" says Max Schick, Cuban publisher of the Spanish-language magazine Replicia. \"But realistically we know the situation is different. We have been in Miami for a long time. We may have to fight for our children to go to school here. This is where we live.\" The deaths, however, are not so rare. In 1973, Luciano Nieves, 43, a former captain in Castro's army, was shot to death in a Miami parking lot only a few days after he had been a witness in a libel suit. The killing, police believe, was the work of anti-Castro terrorists who may have been responsible for as many as 50 bombings during the past year. A few days after the murder, a \"hit list\" was found targeting a dozen other prominent exiles.\n\nDespite their fraternal struggles and their fierce ethnic pride, the Cuban-Americans are steadily moving into the American mainstream. What they need now is political power. \"We were economically successful, years ago,\" says Miami city commissioner Manolo Rebozo, who in 1973 became the first Cuban-American to be elected to office in Florida. \"But political power is not as important at the time.\" Currently, Cubans account for only 10 per cent of the registered voters in Miami and 23 per cent in Hialeah. But they are beginning to sign up for U.S. citizenship in record numbers and to demand jobs as civil servants, policemen and teachers. The Cubans may never jump into the melting pot, but they know what it takes to claim a place by the fire.\n\nNewsweek, March 17, 1975\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: UNION MUNDIAL ANTICOMUNISTA (UMA)\nFBI FILE NO: 105-22199 (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 20 AUGUST 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET - NO FOREIGN DISSEMINATION\nSUBJECT: RUBEN DARIO NASCIMANNA CORREA\nFBI FILE NO: 105-21878 (MIAMI).\nSECRET\n\nDO DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201 DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE.\n\nPERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCUMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM IP/FILES.\n\nLESNIK, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M.\n201-0889544\nHVCA-19960\n13 AUG 74\n\nCIT CUBA\n\nRES USA, FLA, MIAMI, HAD INTERVIEW IN HIS MIAMI OFFICE W/ ALFONSO JIMENEZ RAMOS, 201-0889544, 12 JUN 74 PHOTO ATTACHED\n\nDATE 21 AUG 74\n\n09150870\n\n201-209258\n\nSECRET\n\nF2 IMPET CL BY 056979\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 31 JULY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: ACCION ORIANA (AC)\nFBI FILE NO.: 106-21947 (MIAMI)\n(COPY AVAILABLE IN FILE OF\nORLANDO BOSCH\nAVILA - NO. 4 OF THIS TRACF)\n\nDATE: 29 JULY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nSUBJECT: ORLANDO GARCIA BENITEZ\nFBI FILE NO.: 106-21901 (MIAMI)\nSECRET 2319162 JUL 74 STAFF\n\nCITE WH/MIAI 22190 (ENNIS ACTING)\n\nTO: DIRECTOR INFO PANAMA CITY,\n\nRYBAT\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 577760\n\n1. FOLLOWING IS VERBATIM EXCERPT FROM JULY 23 MIAMI NEWS COLUMN \"MIAMI AL DIA\" BY HILCA INCLAN:\n\n\"WHO IS THE AGGRESSOR AND WHO IS THE VICTIM IS THE QUESTION IN THE LATEST OF CUBAN EXILE SQUABBLES.\n\n\"PEDRO MARTINEZ, A FIGURE IN VARIOUS EXILE REVOLUTIONARY ORGANIZATIONS, SAYS MAX L E S N I K, EDITOR AND OWNER OF REPLICA MAGAZINE AND NEWSPAPER, AND STAFFER MIGUEL A L V A R E Z POINTED GUNS AT HIM AND ORDERED HIM OUT OF DADE COUNTY JUNE 26, OUTSIDE MARTINEZ' HOME, 1800 NW, 24TH AVE.\n\n\"MARTINEZ FILED CHARGES AGAINST BOTH MEN WITH THE STATE ATTORNEY AND RETAINED ATTORNEY ELLIS RUBIN TO FIGHT THE CASE FOR HIM.\n\n\"LESNIK SAYS IT WAS MARTINEZ WHO FIRST THREATENED HIM AND ONE OF HIS PHOTOGRAPHERS, ESTEBAN MARTIN.\n\nSECRET\nLESNIK SAYS HE AND ALVAREZ THEN SET UP A MEETING WITH MARTINEZ AND TALKED TO HIM, BUT NEVER POINTED GUNS AT HIM, OR THREATENED TO KILL HIM. NO SHOTS WERE FIRED AND NO ONE WAS HURT.\n\n\"I ONLY TOLD HIM THAT IF HE DIDN'T SHAVE UP SOMEBODY WOULD TAKE HIM OUTSIDE THE COUNTY TO CHATTANOOGA. LESNIK SAYS, \"HIS LATEST FAD IS TO SAY I'M HIS ENEMY\".\n\n\"HE SPECULATED MARTINEZ COULD BE CONNECTED WITH A NEW GROUP CALLING ITSELF (UMA), THE SPANISH INITIALS FOR WORLD ANTI-COMMUNIST UNION. UMA HAS TAKEN CREDIT FOR VANDALISM AGAINST CUBAN STORES WHICH SELL REPLICA. UMA SAYS THE MAGAZINE IS COMMUNISTIC.\n\n\"BOTH MEN HAVE AGREED TO HAVE THEIR VERSION OF THE STORY TESTED BY A LIE DETECTOR. LESNIK ALREADY GAVE HIS VERSION AS SWORN TESTIMONY TO THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. ATTORNEY RUBIN WROTE A LETTER TO THE STATE ATTORNEY CHARGING A 'WATERGATE TYPE COVERUP' IN THE CASE AND DEMANDING WARRANTS BE ISSUED OR INFORMATIONS (SIC) FILED AGAINST LESNIK AND ALVAREZ WITHIN 24 HOURS.\n\n\"I THINK BOTH RUBIN AND MARTINEZ ARE TWO PUBLICITY\nSEEKERS, KEEPING EACH OTHER COMPANY, LESNIK SAYS.\"\n\n2. FILE: 56-9-20, E2, IMPDET\nFBI DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 23 JULY 1974\n\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\n\nSUBJECT: UNION MUNDIAL ANTICOMUNISTA (UMA)\n\nFBI FILE NO: 105-22159 (MIAMI)\nSECRET\nBLACK TAPE DOCUMENT\n\nTO: RID/Files, GC-52\nFROM: LA/RMO, 7631, 1906\n\nI certify that the enclosed document is the CS Copy, has been properly input to the CS Records System, and that its Dennison Tickets and back-flap (where applicable) are stapled to the outside of this envelope, together with a completed Form 2021, to restrict the file (Form 2021 required only for document classified to a 201 file).\n\nDoc. Symbol and Number\nDIR-570490\n\nDate of Document\n3 July 74\n\nDoc. is Classified to RID File No. 201-209258\n\nSECRET\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nTO: PANAMA CITY INFO MEXICO CITY\n\nRE: PANAMA CITY 23150 [IN-29439241]\n\n1. FYI ONLY: LESNICK INVOLVED IN DEFENSE WITNESS IN ONGOING COURT CASE IN WASHINGTON. LESNICK POSSIBLY CIS AGENT, OR AT LEAST HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL MEMBER OF CUBAN EXILE COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN TERRORIST ACTIVITIES. DUE SENSITIVITY COURT CASE, ADVISABILITY APPROACHING FBI HAS ABOUT INVESTIGATION OF LESNICK AND/OR NASCUNANA JR. WILL REQUIRE FURTHER STUDY. WILL ADVISE.\n\n2. WILL POUCH TO PANAMA CITY COPIES OF PREVIOUS FBI REPORTS ON LESNICK AMONG APPARENT CONCERN OF FBI IS ACTIVITY LESNICK AS UNREGISTERED AGENT PANAMANIAN GOVT. INCLUDING ALLEGATION THAT HE SOURCE OF INFO RESULTING IN ARREST IN PANAMA OF GABRIEL GREGORIO RODRIGUEZ. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COURT CASE OF PARA 1. ADVISE TO JUDGE FROM FBI REPORTING. NASCUNANA WAS IN MIAMI JAN 74 ACTING AS CASE OFFICER FOR LESNICK AND AN EMPLOYEE OF LESNICK'S NAMED MARIO CABRERA. TRACES FOLLOW BY DISPATCH.\n\n3. ANY FURTHER INFO MCKERTHY MIGHT COME ACROSS WOULD BE\n\nDATE: 7/18/74\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE REPRODUCTION OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nOUTGOING MESSAGE\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nFILE: 201-770319, 201-204288 (CLESNICK). E2 IMPORT A\n\nSUBJECT: RUBEN DARIO NASCUNANA CORREA OF PANAMA HANAH 6-2.\n\nCGC EO DIETEL (PHONE)\n\nSECRET\n\nDATE: 2 JUL 79\n\nG/C: NICKERSON/J. GALLETT\n\nU/C: LH/2/P\n\nE/C: 1764\n\nREPRODUCTION\n\nSECRET\n\nCL UF: 051047\nSECRET 282127 JUN 74 STAFF\n\nCITE PANAMA CITY 28250\n\n1. DIRECTOR INFO MEXICO CITY, MANAGUA.\n\n2. STONE HYPOCH.\n\n3. MANAGUA 21218 (in 272441)\n\n4. MEXICO CITY 28479 (in 273035)\n\n1. FLOYD H. MCNERTNEY (NDC) HAS BEEN ABLE TO IDENTIFY\n\nTHE SUBJECTS OF REFERENCES AS FATHER (M A S C U N A A\n\nJENZALEZ) AND SON (M A S C U N A A CORREA) THRU NATIONAL\n\nGUARD FILES. MCNERTNEY REPORTS THAT SON IS NOW WORKING\n\nFULL-TIME AS NATIONAL GUARD LIASON WITH THE THREE\n\nGUARD OFFICERS STATIONED IN PANAMA. HE FURTHER IS OF THE\n\nOPINION THAT SON, BECAUSE OF ATTITUDE, REPEATED TRIPS TO\n\nCUBA, AND EXTENSIVE ASSOCIATION WITH CUBANS BOTH ON AND OFF\n\nDUTY, HAS BEEN RECRUITED BY C.I.S. BASED ON HIS KNOWLEDGE OF\n\nMAX. L E S N I C K. MCNERTNEY FURTHER SUSPECTS THAT ANY\n\nRELATION BETWEEN THESE TWO INVOLVES ONE OR BOTH OF TWO THINGS,\n\nONE, GOP MAY BE USING LESNICK AND MAGAZINE \"REPLICA\" AS ANTI-\n\nU.S. PROP MECHANISM ON CANAL ZONE ISSUE AND/OR FOR INVESTIGATIVE\n\nCOVERAGE OF PANAMANIAN EXILE ACTIVITIES IN MIAMI WITH\n\nSECRET\nMASCUNANA, JR, AS THE CHANNEL. TWO, DGI MAY BE USING\nMASCUNANA, JR, AND LESNICK TO COVER CUBAN EXILES IN MIAMI,\nBECAUSE OF THE VERY OVERT NATURE OF MASCUNANA - CUIS\nRELATIONSHIP WE SUSPECT THE FORMER.\n\n2. IN ANY CASE, MASCUNANA CORREA IS EX-ASSET OF OURS\nWHO CAN IDENTIFY HIS THREE FORMER CASE OFFICERS (VEAUSSELL,\nSOLLIDAY, AND LYNAM) AND PROBABLY ALL STATION LIASON\nOFFICERS SINCE 1977. HE FURTHER REPORTEDLY HEAVILY INVOLVED\nIN DRUG TRAFFIC AT PRESENT TIME. WE CONCERNED THAT IF ANY\nWORD OF THIS INVESTIGATION GETS BACK TO HYGRUFF-1 HE IS\nGOING TO BLAME US. TO PROTECT OUR EQUITIES, REQUEST\nHEADQUARTERS CONTACT FBI AND DETERMINE REASON FOR, AND\nDETAILS OF, FBI INVESTIGATION. FURTHER REQUEST THAT ANY\nFURTHER INVESTIGATION OF SUBJ BE COORDINATED WITH STATION.\n\n3. REQUEST TRACES LESNICK.\n\n4. INDEX AND FILE: 281-2772319. E2 IMPDET\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nDC DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201\nDOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DC FILE.\nPERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCU-\nMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL\nINFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED\nFROM IP/FILES.\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M\n201-0770319\nPACY-28950\n28 JUN 74\n\nGCP MAY BE USING SUBJ AND MAGAZINE REPLICA AS\nANTI-U.S. PROP MECHANISM OF CANAL ZONE ISSUE\nAND/OR FOR INVESTIGATIVE COVERAGE OF PANAMANIAN\nEXILE ACTIVITIES IN MIAMI WITH MASCUNANA, JR\n201-0770319 AS THE CHANNEL\n\nDATE 27 AUG 74\n09162006\n\nSECRET\nE2 IMPDET CL BY 054979\nFBI DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 28 JUNE 1974\n\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\n\nSUBJECT: MAX LESNICK\n\nFBI FILE NO.: 105-3492 (MIAMI)\nFBI DOCUMENT (CROSS REFERENCE SHEET)\n\nDATE: 25 JUNE 1974\n\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\n\nSUBJECT: \"ZERO\" (AN ORGANIZATION)\n\nFBI FILE NO: 1-7-22094; 9-2690 (MIAMI)\n\nDOCUMENT AVAILABLE IN IP/CFS\nSECRET 2621132 JUN 74 STAFF\nCITE PANAMA CITY 28924.\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY, MANAGUA INFO DIRECTOR.\n\n1. STATION IN RECEIPT OF REQUEST FROM FBI MEXICO CITY\nVIA CONSUL FOR ANY INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON RUBEN DARO\nM. S. C. U. N. A. A. 2ND LT. NATIONAL GUARD. SUBJ MAY BE\nIDENTICAL WITH RUBEN DARO M. S. C. U. N. A. A. CORREA\n(1-770-14) PANAMANIAN 2ND OFFICER IN OFFICIAL CAPS\nWITH CUBAN INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS STATIONED IN PANAMA. MAY ALSO BE\nIDENTICAL WITH SUBJ OF SAME NAME, A TRAFFICKING UNKNOWNS WHO\nREPORTED AS MEMBER OF PANAMANIAN CONSULAR CORPS STATIONED\nMANAGUA AS OF OCTOBER 73. FBI GIVES THEIR SUBJECTS 509\nFL. PANAMA CITY, 13 MAY 41 AND RESIDENCE AS VILLA ESPADA 3365.\nPANAMA CITY. MASCUNANA CORREA'S FATHER IS PANAMA CITY.\n17 APRIL 42. LAST KNOWN ADDRESS CALLE 6 AND AVENIDA 8.\n2. BUREAU REQUEST STATES THAT MASCUNANA (FBI #105-13993)\nIS SUBJ OF INVESTIGATION BECAUSE OF CONTACT WITH MAX\n\nL. E. S. N. I. C. K., EDITOR OF \"REPLICA\" MAGAZINE, MIAMI WHI IN\nJRN SUBJ OF FBI SECURITY INVESTIGATION. FLOYD M. MCERTNEY\n(LOC) IS IN DAILY CONTACT WITH FIRST MASCUNANA ABOVE AND ALSO\n\nSECRET\nKNOWS LESNICK AS PRO-CASTRO LEFTIST.\n\n3. BECAUSE OF OUR ODS INTEREST STATION HAS ADVISED CONSUL THAT WE WILL REPLY TO FBI REQUEST THRU OUR CHANNELS.\n\n4. FOR MANAGUA: CAN YOU PROVIDE MATRONYMIC AND CURRENT LOCATION OF MASCUNANA THE CONSUL?\n\n5. FOR MEXICO CITY: PARA ONE MAY BE PASSED FBI. CAN YOU OBTAIN ANY FURTHER IDENTIFYING INFO FROM FBI?\n\n6. INDEX ALL FILE: 201-7783. X-REF 58-9-1. 22\n\nS C R E T\nSECRET\n\nDO DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201\nDOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE.\nPERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCU-\nMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL\nINFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED\nFROM IP/FILES.\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M.\n201-0770319\nPACY-28924\n26 JUN. 74.\nCIT CUBA\nOCC NEWS\nRES USA, MIAMI, EDITOR, REPLICA MAGAZINE PRO-\nCASTRO LEFTIST, SUBJ OF SECURITY IN INVESTIGA-\nTION IN CONTACT WITH RUBEN DARIO MASCUNANA\n\nDATE 07 AUG 74\n09151106\n\n20-209258\n\nSECRET E2 IMPDET Q. BY 054979\nSECRET\n\nDC DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201 DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE. PERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCUMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM 1P FILES.\n\nLESNICK, MAX\n201-0209258\nSEX M\n019-300-026\nWHIM-21546\n17 APR 74\n\nMENTIONED AS ONE OF LEADERS OF FREnte DE LIBERACION NACIONAL DE CUBA.\n\nDATE 16 MAY 74\n09108246\n\nS.E.C.R.E.T\nE2 IMPDET.CL.BY.054979\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 27 MARCH 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: ANTI-CASTRO ACTIVITIES\nFBI FILE NO: 105-1742 (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 14 MARCH 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: REVOLUTIONARY MEDICAL UNION\nDR. HUMBERTO LUIS FONTANA MENDEZ\nFBI FILE NO: 105-71604 (MIAMI)\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 14 MARCH 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: AGENT CUBANA (AC)\nFBI FILE NO: 105-21947 (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 28 FEBRUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: MAX LESHICK\nFBI FILE NO: 105-3492 (MIAMI)\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 20 FEBRUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: ALFREDO SANTIAGO SOLEH ALVAREZ\nFBI FILE NO: NONE GIVEN (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 13 FEBRUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: DIRECTORIO REVOLUCIONARIO (DR)\nFBI FILE NO: 105-21599 (MIAMI)\n\nFBI DOCUMENTS\n\nDATE: 11 FEBRUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: JOS\u00c9 ANTONIO CALATAYUD RIVERO\nFBI FILE NO: 105-21599 (MIAMI)\n\nDATE: 16 JANUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: ORLANDO HOCH AVILA\nFBI FILE NO: 105-2856\n\nFBI DOCUMENT\n\nDATE: 15 JANUARY 1974\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: FREnte CUBANO DE LIBERACION\nFBI FILE NO: 105-21592", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10173-10171.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 50, "total-input-tokens": 57520, "total-output-tokens": 14426, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 961, 1], [961, 1823, 2], [1823, 2458, 3], [2458, 2695, 4], [2695, 5094, 5], [5094, 6249, 6], [6249, 7594, 7], [7594, 8652, 8], [8652, 9121, 9], [9121, 10413, 10], [10413, 11540, 11], [11540, 12607, 12], [12607, 13847, 13], [13847, 14755, 14], [14755, 15720, 15], [15720, 16879, 16], [16879, 17272, 17], [17272, 17816, 18], [17816, 18060, 19], [18060, 18060, 20], [18060, 18060, 21], [18060, 19146, 22], [19146, 19267, 23], [19267, 19267, 24], [19267, 19267, 25], [19267, 19418, 26], [19418, 23642, 27], [23642, 23642, 28], [23642, 23925, 29], [23925, 24535, 30], [24535, 24835, 31], [24835, 25680, 32], [25680, 26694, 33], [26694, 26775, 34], [26775, 26912, 35], [26912, 27439, 36], [27439, 28536, 37], [28536, 28816, 38], [28816, 29816, 39], [29816, 30659, 40], [30659, 31339, 41], [31339, 31456, 42], [31456, 31646, 43], [31646, 32728, 44], [32728, 33128, 45], [33128, 33764, 46], [33764, 34306, 47], [34306, 34581, 48], [34581, 34807, 49], [34807, 35427, 50]]}}
{"id": "8e284ecf619c2fa5c4e6e5697d64eaf68d5bbad4", "text": "10 May 1960\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Payment to Edward G. Tichborn (P)\n\n1. On 9 May this office received a telegram (in the file) from Tichborn (P) dated 5 May 1960 in which he stated that he had not yet received his check for $500.00 from Ashmead, Hanniford & Associates.\n\n2. The undersigned contacted Mr. Thomas Strange, Cover Division, to find out the reason for this delay. After following up this request he informed me that said check had cleared Tichborn's (P) California bank on 27 April, the Federal Reserve on 29 April and is now in Cover Division as a cancelled check.\n\n3. I tried to phone Tichborn (P) late Monday afternoon (9 May) but he was not in his office. I reached him this morning and advised him that the money had been deposited in his bank on the date noted above. Tichborn (P) said he had not checked with the bank but would do so.\n\nEvalena S. Vidal\nPolitical Action Division\nLLF429 0B154 LA610\nL LLJ201 PD LOS ANGELES CALIF 5 250P PDT\nHENRY DARKIN\nPO BOX 8105 SOUTHWEST STATION WASHDC\nNO WORD FROM (ASHMEAD) YET. PLEASE CHECK. MAY HAVE MISMAILED.\nBEST REGARDS\n(HENRY LOPEZ)\n\n201(253)263\n08", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10030.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 3, "total-input-tokens": 3429, "total-output-tokens": 461, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 912, 1], [912, 912, 2], [912, 1126, 3]]}}
{"id": "055cd1e256cb3139d30a1430c085f3a400016868", "text": "25 April 1960\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Payment to Bivard G. Tichborn (P)\n\nTichborn's (P) accountings for the advance given him in connection with his Cuban trip were processed and found in order. The remaining half of his salary ($650.00) which was to be paid upon the completion of his assignment was then processed through the appropriate Finance and Cover channels (hand-carried). The check, drawn on Ashmead, Hanford Associates in the amount of $650.00 was cleared and left with Cover Division late Friday afternoon 22 April 1960. Cover Division said it would be forwarded that day to Ashmead, Hanford Associates in Philadelphia who would then mail it to Tichborn's (P) California bank, on the following Monday - 25 April 1960.\n\nSvalena S. Vidal\n\nOrig. - Subject File\n1 - Chrono", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10033.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 1, "total-input-tokens": 1143, "total-output-tokens": 251, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 794, 1]]}}
{"id": "53d5bb722de2096456931e26044d20f3e686ca07", "text": "RETURN TO CIA\nBackground Use Only\nDo Not Reproduce\n\n4 February 1960\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Meeting with Henry P. Lopez at Carleton Hotel. PP/PA\nrepresentatives were Horace Davis and Evelina Vidal. WH\nrepresentatives were Robert Reynolds (Ritcher) and Philip\nToomey (Thompson). The meeting took place 15 January 1960\n1200 hours to 1510 hours.\n\nHe read the PP staff report on opposition groups (sanitized) and the\nreport (sanitized) on the (Indian political action) operation.\n\nLopez was briefed by Mr. Reynolds on the current situation in Cuba.\nHe was given a check for $1300 and instructions to call Benjamin Evans\nat the Embassy and use the name Fred Morse.\n\nMr. Lopez stated that he foresaw no problems in getting around in Cuba.\nHe mentioned that one of his friends in the Harvard Graduate School,\nRegina Boti Leon, was now in the Castro cabinet and that he and Boti had\ndated the same girl who was now in New York. He intended to phone the\ngirl on his stop-over in New York to renew acquaintance.\n\nLopez was told about security precautions and that Mr. Evans would\nbrief him further on contacts to be made. Mr. Davis asked when he would\nbe back here and Lopez said about the second of February. Davis said that\nwe would tape his remarks at that time. Lopez was asked to keep accurate\naccount of his arrivals and departures for accounting purposes.\n\n(P. Toomey)\nWH/PA/PP", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10036.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 1, "total-input-tokens": 1180, "total-output-tokens": 396, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 1387, 1]]}}
{"id": "5f095a39c4f3afef59e84ff54339f59e12754725", "text": "SECRET\n\n1 February 1960\n\nSUBJECT: Meeting with Henry F. Lopez at the Statler-Hilton Hotel on 1 February 1960 from 1000 hours to 1530 hours.\n\n1. Those present were: Mrs. Vidal FP/PA, Alexander Hunter (Williams) FP/PA, Charles Penney (Twiss) MI/PA, and Philip Toomey (Thompson) MI/PA.\n\n2. Mr. Lopez gave a report of his contacts in Cuba after receiving his notes which were brought up by Mr. Joel and given to Mr. Lopez by Mr. Cooney. Mr. Lopez said that he had given biographical sketches of Escobar, Basco, Lauriano Batista, Martinez Fraga, Ruben de Leon and Sanchez Arango to the Station representative. He had also turned over a report of Martinez Fraga on the aims of the Revolucion de la Revolucion.\n\n3. Mr. Lopez's report was taped and a transcript will be forwarded to MI by FP/PA.\n\n4. Specific recommendations made by Mr. Lopez included having Herbert Matthews go to Havana and try to influence Castro. Matthews has a good reputation throughout the 25th of July Movement and could help in an approach to Castro. A visit by Ed Hurwitz to do a broadcast on Cuba was also recommended. Mr. Lopez feels that Castro will be in power for a long time to come and that we should try to influence him. He is seriously affected by any defections and these might be encouraged.\n\n5. Castro can be hit by defections of overworked and countermanded officials. Two men who were mentioned as ripe for defection are Rafa in Hacienda and Cepeda in Comercio. Mr. Lopez also recommended contact with Padre Alberto de Castro in Cienfuegos. This padre was formerly Fidel's instructor. When Fidel was in Cienfuegos he was scolded by Padre Castro when Fidel treated with great respect according to Basco. The padre and Fidel spent about one and one half hours alone together at this time. This priest should be checked as a possible influence on Fidel. The possibility of a split between Fidel and Ra\u00fal should be exploited. Ra\u00fal is cold and mean and the fact that he is Fidel's brother does not carry too much weight.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10037.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 1, "total-input-tokens": 1180, "total-output-tokens": 537, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 1999, 1]]}}
{"id": "4f4ff6f4f50a6ae78c3ece31d33650029d893878", "text": "MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD:\n\nSUBJECT: Debriefing of Edward G. Tichborn(P)\n\n1. Edward G. Tichborn(P) arrived in Washington from his trip to Cuba during the night of 31 January 1960. He was debriefed at the Hotel Statler from about 1000 to 1530 hours on 1 February. Those present at the debriefing were Messrs. O3 (Phil Toomey) and Charles Penney from WH Division, Mr. Alexander Hunter (PP/EAD), and the undersigned. This debriefing was very interesting and resulted in a good deal of pertinent information. The three and a half reels of tape derived therefrom are now being transcribed by this office. Some of the more salient points are noted below.\n\nII\n\n2. Some of the operational information and suggestions offered by Tichborn are the following:\n\na. There appears to be little chance of a coalition of the opposition groups at this time or in the near future since they are not well organized and each group xxx would want to be the leader of such an effort. Also, according to the members of the opposition to whom Tichborn talked, it is the general consensus of opinion that Fidel Castro is in no danger of losing his grip or the devotion of his followers for some time to come.\n\nb. Fidel Castro seems to become most upset and almost panicked by defections. Possessing a \"Messianic-type complex\" he cannot bear the thought of someone leaving the fold. Rather than to let such defections pass unnoticed, he feels compelled to give reasons and make excuses. This then blows the matter up perhaps out of proportion and quickly becomes a matter of public knowledge. Tichborn feels that the inducement of defections could perhaps have more effect on Castro than any other single, rational action we might undertake.\n\nc. There appears to be a relatively long-standing schism between the brothers Fidel and Raoul Castro. Raoul is the more cold individual. As an example, Fidel once ordered some 400 prisoners to be returned safely to their homes, but Raoul had a number of them killed. The general feeling in Cuba is that Fidel is not a Communist, but that Raoul is undoubtedly at least a fellow-traveller. Developing or exploiting this schism could therefore, be operationally advantageous. (The fact that they are brothers would probably have little effect on Fidel who has already reduced xxxxxx the land holdings of his mother and another brother in conformity with the agrarian reform program and who jailed his sister, and fired a Minister, over a shake-down on an insurance deal.)\n\n3. Of special operational interest were several individuals Tichborn mentioned who might have some influence on Fidel Castro and hence might be of\noperational interest. They are:\n\na. Father (Padre) Alberto de Castro: he is a Jesuit priest presently located in Caracas, Venezuela, who had been a teacher of Fidel Castro during his youth. Castro was in Venezuela and saw Father de Castro there during which time the latter criticized Fidel for some of his actions. In spite of the fact that this remonstration occurred in front of some of Fidel's men, and they later treated him with great respect, it was felt by Tichborn's source that this information, and by Tichborn, that Father de Castro undoubtedly has some influence over Castro. Tichborn suggested that it would be of value to determine whether or not Fidel has any regular contact with Father de Castro and if so, what operational potential he might have.\n\nb. \"Harb\" Mathews: he is a journalist with the N.Y. Times and was the only American newspaperman covering the Castro story prior to his final success. While Tichborn was in Cuba, a front page article appeared in Revolution (the regime's press spokesman) on Mathews. It was a sort of editorial and praised Mathews as a \"real man\" and one who understood the revolution and its aims. Tichborn feels that it might be to our advantage to get into contact with Mathews since he appears to have the confidence of the administration.\n\nc. Professor Rosco: Subject is on the faculty of the Universidad de Villanueva and is a contemporary of Fidel Castro. They were classmates and both were debaters although according to Rosco, Castro did not make the Debating Society of which he was a member. Once after the revolution, Rosco attended a speech Castro made and after the oration, the latter asked Rosco what he thought of it. Upon hearing some criticism, he wanted to know how it could have been improved. Since Castro was leaving for Venezuela and the United States he asked Rosco to accompany him in order that they could discuss the matter further. Tichborn feels that Rosco (a member of the opposition) probably has more influence on Castro than Rosco realizes and that this possibility would be worth looking into.\n\nd. Edward R. Murrow: he produced a TV program on Castro and Tichborn feels that he might have established a rapport with Castro during this period.\n\n4. One of the contacts Tichborn made in Cuba (the Director of Tourism) asked him if he knew of anyone who would be interested in coming to Cuba on an all-expenses-paid visit in order to write articles (or other similar propaganda) on present day Cuba. Tichborn mentioned Cleo Roberts, a popular radio and TV commentator in Los Angeles as a possible candidate. (Tichborn also discussed this matter with Horace W. Davis.) Tichborn will mention this possibility to Roberts upon his return to California.\n\n5. While in Cuba, Tichborn accidentally met a young lady who later revealed to him that she was \"an agent for the State Department\". He felt that this was a security matter and that it should be brought to our attention for that purpose. Mr. (Toomey) did not recognize the name; it is being further checked out with WH Division. The incident and the details will be made the subject of a separate memorandum for CI Staff.\n6. On the administrative side, Mr. Tichborn will forward by mail his financial accounting, one copy to the cover company and the other to Henry W. Darkin(f). The cover letter which was provided him the event that he came to the attention of the Cuban authorities was returned to us and is now in his file. (There was no necessity for its use.) Tichborn inquired as to the possibility of receiving reimbursement for medical expenses which will undoubtedly be incurred upon his return to California due to a possible hernia which developed in New York on his return trip en route to Washington. This is being checked out by this office. Tichborn departed for Los Angeles (having been taken to Friendship International Airport by Henry W. Darkin) at about 1800 hours on 1 February 1960.\n\nEvalena S. Vidal", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10038.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 3, "total-input-tokens": 3466, "total-output-tokens": 1564, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 2633, 1], [2633, 5786, 2], [5786, 6587, 3]]}}
{"id": "ce01003323ec5efa9ab145e40f20aab2954ce309", "text": "Edward G. Tichborn's bank is as follows:\n\nBank of America\nWilshire-Sweetzer Branch,\n6507 Wilshire Blvd.,\nLos Angeles 48, California\n\nThe check for the $2,000 operational advance was drawn on a check of the cover company. It was mailed from Washington with an accompanying letter written by Tichborn stating that it should be deposited to his Commercial Account. Date of writing and forwarding was 15 January 1960.\n\nThe $650 check for \u00bd of his total salary, should be mailed to the same bank and credited to his Commercial Account.\n\nE.S.V.\n19 Jan 60", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10041.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 1, "total-input-tokens": 1143, "total-output-tokens": 184, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 548, 1]]}}
{"id": "7bc1878e45583eb2d9b338b2e857bdb8bd1f8de4", "text": "Dear Mr. Tichborn:\n\nThe following is set forth as clarification of your present mission, and the procedures which will be followed in the conduct of it. Please indicate your agreement by signing below.\n\nA. Operational\n\n1. You will be briefed generally on some aspects of the Cuban situation while in Washington on this date.\n\n2. The major briefing to be given you concerning the local political situation, security precautions, and more detailed instructions on your present mission will be undertaken upon your arrival in Havana.\n\n3. Upon arrival in Havana a tourist card will be issued by the Cuban Immigration authorities. You will give your true name and occupation in the United States and state that you are in that area as a \"tourist\".\n\n4. Your initial contact in Havana will be with IDEN A (name and telephone number attached hereto). When making this call, you will identify yourself as Fred Morse.\n\n5. IDEN A will then give you the briefing mentioned in paragraph 2 above.\n\n6. IDEN A will also arrange to put you in contact with about two individuals for the purpose of starting you on your assignment. It is anticipated that other leads and contacts will result from these introductions, both in Havana and the interior.\n\n7. When talking to any local contacts you make while in Cuba, your cover story will be the following: that you are talking to them on the behalf of some (unnamed) American businessmen and investors in order to assess discreetly their position and legal resources as concerns the revolutionary laws and to determine the possibility for future financial development and investments.\n8. We are providing you with a letter from a cover company (attached hereto) which you will use only in the case of extreme emergency in the event that you come to the attention of the Cuban authorities. This letter states that you are there on a vacation and that this company has asked you to get some first-hand information on the subjects mentioned in paragraph 7 above while there if you are so inclined. This will provide you with a plausible excuse for being both a tourist and one interested in talking with local personalities.\n\n9. Your mission generally is to talk with as many knowledgeable persons as possible regarding the political situation in Cuba, with special emphasis on the opposition, its strengths, weaknesses, plans and programs. Of particular interest is the possibility or feasibility of a coalescence of these opposition groups.\n\nB. Administrative\n\n1. While on your present assignment you will keep a record of your expenses which will enable you to submit the required accounting for funds upon your return. In keeping the accounts you should note times of arrival and departure, detailed notation of expenses incurred, and the rate of exchange obtained when exchanging U. S. dollars into local currency.\n\n2. Upon your return you will submit two accountings. One will include your salary under \"services rendered\", and also your expenses and will be in true name to the following company:\n\n   Ashmead, Manifold Associates\n   1615 Spruce Street,\n   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania\n\n3. The second accounting will also include salary and operational expenses and will be submitted in pseudonym to:\n\n   Henry W. Darkin\n   P. O. Box 8105\n   Southwest Station\n   Washington, D. C.\n\n   [Signature]\n\n   [Date]", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10043.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 2, "total-input-tokens": 2323, "total-output-tokens": 767, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 1614, 1], [1614, 3337, 2]]}}
{"id": "a781064a3037064e323287439d8e6312cf7d5de3", "text": "RETURN TO CIA\nBackground Use Only\nDo Not Reproduce\n\n27 October 1959\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Cover Division\nATTENTION: Mr. Strange (x-8264)\nSUBJECT: (Henry P. Lopez) 05\n\n1. To confirm your conversation with (same name) on 26 October 1959 vs request that backstopping facilities be provided for Subject by the following organization:\n\n   Ackerman, Manifold Associates\n   1615 Spruce Street\n   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania\n\n2. Subject will send a true copy of his expenses to this organization and at the same time he will submit to PS/PAO, via a post office box address, a detailed accounting in accordance with Agency regulations.\n\n3. For your information Subject's address is:\n\n   6505 Wilshire Boulevard\n   Los Angeles, California\n\n4. Subject's pseudonym is forwarded under separate cover.\n\nHorace W. Davis\nActing Chief\nPolitical Action Division\n\nDistribution:\nOrig. & 1 - addressee\n1 - chrono\n1 - Subject file", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10058.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 1, "total-input-tokens": 1180, "total-output-tokens": 285, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 909, 1]]}}
{"id": "585a8e4dad18a582736a40b764814a78320cc878", "text": "FILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: LOCANDY, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH\n201 - 285412\nVOL. III\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY: THIRD AGENCY DOCUMENTS\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 28 JULY 72    | 10:30         | TIM KELLY                | James P. Kelly                 |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nFILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: LOCANDY, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH\n201 - 285412\nVOL. III\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY: THIRD AGENCY DOCUMENTS\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 28 JULY 28    | 10:54         | MAL KELLY                | James P. Kelly                 |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nSECRET\n\n22 July 1969\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, SB\nVIA: Chief of Station\nSUBJECT: Celebration of Polish National Day, 22 July 1969\n\n1. The undersigned attended the celebration of the Polish national day at the Polish Residence on Insurgentes Sur on 22 July 1969. The following points were the most significant:\n\n   a. The only Soviet the undersigned could identify was Col. Konstantin Nikandrovich BOGATYREV, the Soviet Military Attache. Someone the undersigned's wife talked to mentioned the presence of the Soviet Consul, but this certainly was neither Valentin LOGINOV nor Yuriy CHERNYSH, and the undersigned did not meet that person.\n\n   b. Whether the Cubans were invited or not, they were not in attendance.\n\n   c. Jiri SVESTKA, of the Czech Embassy, was there. Per SB Section briefing, the undersigned mentioned his departure and told SVESTKA that at least he would remain in Mexico. SVESTKA said that this would not be the case, that he is scheduled to leave within 15 days for Czechoslovakia. The undersigned then mentioned a conversation with his Czech friend in which the latter told him that he expected to stay in Mexico for quite a while longer. SVESTKA denied ever having said this, pointing out that he was glad to return home. The undersigned made no further comments.\n\nSECRET\nd. The ex-Haitian Ambassador, Julio Jean PIERRE-AUDAIN, was seen by the undersigned but left before he could talk to him. In view of the fact that PIERRE-AUDAIN ceased to be Ambassador of Haiti a long time ago, the undersigned feels that his presence at the Polish national day celebrations has some significance. He remembers that PIERRE-AUDAIN was also present at the celebration of the Czech national day this year. In other words, the Communists have made it a point to maintain contact with him, probably in view of the fact that PIERRE-AUDAIN may return to Haiti if something happens to DUVALIER and may secure a position of some importance in his country.\n\n2. The President of the Consular Association, YOURVOULIAS, told the undersigned that he would contact LOGINOV at the Soviet Embassy to see whether the latter would agree to a joint celebration of both the undersigned's and LOGINOV's departures in a party to be held for both of them at the same time. LOGINOV is not scheduled to leave Mexico until September 1969, a departure postponed from the original schedule of late July or early August.\n\nRaymond A. FRADYER\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - 7 (Consular Corps)\n(1) - P-11712 (LOGINOV)\n1 - P-7111 (SVESTKA)\n1 - P-5407 (PIERRE-AUDAIN)\n\nRAF:1mp\nSECRET\n\n22 July 1939\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, SB\n\nVIA: Chief of Station\n\nSUBJECT: Celebration of Polish National Day, 22 July 1939\n\n1. The undersigned attended the celebration of the Polish national day at the Polish Residence on Insurgentes Sur on 22 July 1939. The following points were the most significant:\n\n   a. The only Soviet the undersigned could identify was Col. Konstantin Nikandrovich Bogatyrev, the Soviet Military Attach\u00e9. Someone the undersigned's wife talked to mentioned the presence of the Soviet Consul, but this certainly was neither Valentin Loginov nor Yuriy Chernysh, and the undersigned did not meet that person.\n\n   b. Whether the Cubans were invited or not, they were not in attendance.\n\n   c. Jiri Svestka, of the Czech Embassy, was there. Per SB Section briefing, the undersigned mentioned his departure and told Svestka that at least he would remain in Mexico. Svestka said that this would not be the case, that he is scheduled to leave within 14 days for Czechoslovakia. The undersigned then mentioned a conversation with his Czech friend in which the latter told him that he expected to stay in Mexico for quite a while longer. Svestka denied ever having said this, pointing out that he was glad to return home. The undersigned made no further comments.\n\nSECRET\nd. The ex-Haitian Ambassador, Julio Jean PIERRE-AUDAIN, was seen by the undersigned but left before he could talk to him. In view of the fact that PIERRE-AUDAIN ceased to be Ambassador of Haiti a long time ago, the undersigned feels that his presence at the Polish national day celebrations has some significance. He remembers that PIERRE-AUDAIN was also present at the celebration of the Czech national day this year. In other words, the Communists have made it a point to maintain contact with him, probably in view of the fact that PIERRE-AUDAIN may return to Haiti if something happens to DUVALIER and may secure a position of some importance in his country.\n\n2. The President of the Consular Association, VOURVOULIAS, told the undersigned that he would contact LOGINOV at the Soviet Embassy to see whether the latter would agree to a joint celebration of both the undersigned's and LOGINOV's departures in a party to be held for both of them at the same time. LOGINOV is not scheduled to leave Mexico until September 1969, a departure postponed from the original schedule of late July or early August.\n\nRaymond A. FRADYER\n\nDistribution:\nOrig. - 7 (Consular Corps)\n1 - P-11712 (LOGINOV)\n1 - P-7111 (SV\u011aSTKA)\n1 - P-5407 (PIERRE-AUDAIN)\n\nRAF: Imp\nContact Report\nSubject: L1041-1 (R-5903)\nDate of meet: July 17 at Hoyt 19 at 1430 hrs\n\n1. Prearranged meet which lasted 90 minutes.\n   Next meet: August 17 at the same place.\n\n2. On Friday July 11 L1041-1 gave a regular language class\nto L-1 and L-1 stated his interest to meet the Sov girl at L1041-1's\nhouse. In the course of conv L-1 explained to L1041-1 why he believed\nthis was important to him or in other words he gave him the cover story\nabout which we spoke at our previous meet. L1041-1 assured L-1 that\nhe would bring the Sov girl (Lilla L1041-1) to his house.\n\n3. On July 16 at 1000 hrs, i.e., at their next class L1041-1 told\nL-1 that he was to go to the Sov Emb to visit L1041-1 and he found him\nthis time. In the course of conv with LCG he (L1041-1) told him about\nmeeting Lilla and his plans to invite her to his home and show her around.\nLCG told him that Lilla was his secretary and that he should not dare to\nget close to her.\n\n4. LCG felt defeated with this development, because he believed that\nhe was on the way developing something for us. I told L-1 that there was\nno reason of feeling bad about this fact, especially, because LCG was\nleaving relatively soon and the girl would remain here.\n\n5. L-1 told me that on July 11 L1041-1 had taken an old\npicture in which there was an advertising picture for girls in a shiny blouse\nand he asked L-1 can he give to LCG if he wanted. LCG apparently,\nL1041-1 showed the picture to LCG and wanted to joke with the picture but\nLCG became very angry about the fact that international figures are\nused for cheap ads. L-1 suspected that LCG might have asked from there\nin our talk that L1041-1 stated his case.\n\n6. L-1 plans taking a trip to the vacation starting the second\nweek of...\nMemo for the Records\n\nSUBJECT: First Sistone and Fraeler Cover Job Outing with Consular Corps\n\nBrief Initial Exposure to Soviets Logino and G. Leznev\n\n1. Terence D. Sistone and Fraeler, both under Consular cover, accompanied (with wives) Fraeler on an outing of the \"Cuerpo Consular en Mexico\", a social club open to all consular officers (regardless of nationality) to new Ford factory in Cuautitlan, lunch and excursion of.\n\nSpan. col. Convent at Tepotzotlan from 1000 to 1600hrs. on 17 July 1969.\n\nConsular Corps is creature of Amer. cit and ex-Consul Gen. of Greece, Leander T. Vourvoulis, who led excursion. In addition to helping the two new Sta. officers work into consular cover and make contacts, the purpose of the outing in part was to see at first hand the Sov, Bloc and Cubans who belong to the CC. Three Sovs showed, no identifiable Bloc and no Cubas. MMK\n\nNo other particularly interesting cons. types but door opened to meet people at future CC meets.\n\n2. Three Sovs who showed were Valentin Logino, well-known to Sta. as KGB under cons. cover, and two men of Commercial Sec. of Sov. Emb. Both Sistone and Fraeler independently identified Lew N. Leznev as one of two commercial types from mug book were unable identify the other, who was quiet and hardly talked as he tagged along. G. Leznev was also quiet but was engaged twice by Sistone in conversation. One one occasion G said he had been in Mexico short time, was there as result recent Sov-Mex trade agreement, just happened to be around and invited with colleague to Ford outing. On other occasion G said Tepotzotlan church and general art more ornate and in, receive than Byzantine church-monuments he familiar with in Moscow. Spoke Span. with heavy accent and didn't talk much but was quite fluent nevertheless. MMK.\n\nSistone also took briefly to Logino and introduced by Fraeler as Fraeler replacement. However conversation innocuous and uninteresting compared to constant verbal sparring betw. Fraeler and Logino which Sistone will defer to Fraeler to report if he sees fit.\n\nSECRET\nMEMO FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUB: Meeting of our group Consular de Mexico, 17 July 69\n\nFR: G. A. FERRELL\n\n1. On 17 July 69 FERRELL and wife attended their first Consular Corps meeting with two other station Officers and wives. FERRELL was introduced to Lev GOLYEV, 201-250177, P-13,766 and Valentin LOGINOV, 201-253112, P-11712 of the Soviet Embassy and to another Russian, unidentified, who appeared very reluctant to talk. GOLYEV was very civil but a bit less expansive than his colleague, LOGINOV, who engaged in a constant verbal bantering with FERRELL. LOGINOV and FERRELL have established a solid rapport which enables them to engage in the aforementioned antics without repercussion. LOGINOV was accompanied by his wife, a very charming, quite woman, who speaks acceptable Spanish. She manifested a real interest in the chemical department of the plant, to the point of explaining certain charts and symbols to LOGINOV. She probably has had some chemical training. LOGINOV himself appeared self-assured, sophisticated and able. He appeared not the slightest concerned over the verbal battle with FERRELL, and held his own during the exchanges. He looks strong physically, especially his hands, which could have been used for a weapon. He possesses a winning smile which he used to his advantage, i.e., a manner of making a loss for words, but come the smile. At one time during the exchange, LOGINOV was captured into a smile from FERRELL, prompting a SISTONE to write in his notebook, \"I wonder if he's numbered, as I would enjoy being in a very well-organized group, with a number assigned to me.\"\n\nFILE: P-13,766\n\nCR: 11,712\n2. SOLOVIEV was, as previously stated, more reserved. He stayed in the background and accompanied the unidentified Russian during most of the tour. FURMAN was introduced to him but little conversation passed between them. He appeared a little stiff, more the Russian stereotype of the reserved, social-ill-at-ease person. But this was just an impression as FURMAN had no chance for an in-depth conversation. SOLOVIEV seemed to possess decent Spanish. He stated he was from the commercial section. Hopefully subject will attend other Corps meetings and FURMAN will have an opportunity to speak to him at greater length.\n\n[Signature]\n\nO A FURMAN\nMemo for the Records\n\nSUBJECT: First Sistone and Farellan Cover Job Outing with Consular Corps\nBrief Initial Exposure to Soviets Loginov and Golenzov\n\n1. Terence O. Sistone and Farellan, both under consular cover, accompanied (with wives) Fradyer on an outing of the \"Cuerpo Consular en Mexico\", a social club open to all consular officers (regardless of nationality) to new Ford factory in Cuautitlan, lunch and excursion of Span. col. Conv. at Tepoztlan from 1000 to 1000hrs, on 17 July 1969. Consular Corps is creature of Amer. cit and ex-Consul Gen. of Greece, Leander P. Vourvouline, who led excursion. In addition to helping the two new Sta. officers work into consular cover and make contacts, the purpose of the outing in part was to see at first hand the Sov. Bloc and Cubans who belong to the CC. Three Sov. showed, no identified Bloc and no Cubans. All had no other particularly interesting cons. types out door opened to meet people at future CC meets.\n\n2. Three Sovs who showed were Valentin Loginov, well-known to Sta. as KGB under cons. cover, and two men of Commercial Sec. of Sov. Emb. Both Sistone and Farellan independently identified Lev N. Golenzov as one of two commercial types from mug book were unable identify the other, who was quiet and hardly talked as he tagged along. Golenzov was also quiet but was engaged by Sistone in conversation. On one occasion Golenzov said he had been in Mexico short time, was there as result recent Sov.-Mex trade agreement, just happened to be around and invited with colleague to Ford outing. On other occasion Golenzov said Tepoztlan church art more crude and less resolute than Byzantine church-monuments he familiar with in Moscow. Spoke Span. with heavy accent and didn't talk much but was quite fluent nevertheless. Sistone also talked briefly to Loginov and introduced by Fradyer as Fradyer replacement. However conversation was monotonous and uninteresting compared to constant verbal sparring between Fradyer and Loginov which Sistone will defer to Fradyer to report if he sees fit.\n\n17 July 69\nP. 117/12\nMemo for the Records\n\nSUBJECT: First Sistone and Ferlem Cover Job Outing with Consular Corps\nBrief Initial Exposure to Soviets Loginov and Gofen Zev\n\n1. Terence D. Sistone and Ferlem, both under Consular cover, accompanied (with wives) Fralyer on an outing of the \"Cuerpo Consular en Mexico\", a social club open to all consular officers (regardless of nationality) to new Ford factory in Cuautitlan, lunch and excursion of Span. col. Convant at Tepotzotlan from 1100 to 1900 hrs, on 17 July 1959. Consular Corps is creature of Amer. cit and ex-Consul Gen. of Greece, Leander P. Vourvoulis, who led excursion. In addition to helping the two new Sta. officers work into consular cover and make contacts, the purpose of the outing was to see at first hand the Sov. Bloc and Cuban who belong to the CC. Three Sovs showed, no identified Bloc and no Cuba. All are no other particularly interesting cons. types but door opened to meet people at future CC meets and.\n\n2. Three Sovs who showed were Valentin Loginov, well-known to Sta. as KGB under cons. cover, and two men of Commercial Sec. of Sov. Emb. Both Sistone and Ferlem independently identified Lev N. Gofen Zev as one of two commercial types from my book were unable identify the other, who was quiet and hardly talked as he tagged along. Gofen Zev was also quiet but was engaged twice by Sistone in conversation. One one occasion G said he had been in Mexico short time, was there as result recent Sov.-lex trade agreement, just happened to be around and invited with colleague to Ford outing. On other occasion G said Tepotzotlan church and general art core ornate and is, repressive than Byzantine church-ornaments he familiar with in Moscow. spoke Span. with heavy accent and didn't talk much but was quite fluent nevertheless. Sistone also talked briefly to Loginov and introduced by Fralyer as Fralyer replacement. However conversation in noxious and uninteresting compared to constant verbal sparring betw. Fralyer and Loginov which Sistone will refer to Fralyer to report if he sees fit.\n\nSECRET\nContact Report\n\nSubject: LIBACON-1 (P-4805)\n\nDate of Meet: July 9 at P\u00e2r\u00e2ne\u0219ti Restaurant-Bar (Newton) at 1630\n\n1. Prearranged meet; L-1 came on time; the meet lasted 2 hours and 30 minutes.\n\n   Next meet: Wed July 16 at 1630 at pick up place in Jacobedo with Gutenberg\n\n2. On July 9 at 0915 hrs L-1 went to the Sov Embassy to look for LOGNOV (P-11,712). A Sov girl receptionist told him that LOG was not in and told him that he could wait in the reception room or wait for him by the waiting room of LOG's office. L-1 preferred to remain with the receptionist(girl). He left after 55 minutes without seeing LOG.\n\n3. When L-1 came to the receptionist and asked for LOG she in turn asked him was he not L-1 (by first name only), son of their language teacher. L-1 answered affirmatively and in turn asked her what was her name and how does she know him. She stated that her name was Alla LNU and that she recognized L-1 by his voice from calling for LOG. (NOTE: L-1 feels positive that at least 4 months have passed since a woman answered the phone when he asked for LOG).\n\n4. In the beginning of the conv L-1 found out that the girl was from Moscow which certainly pleased L-1 because he had what to talk about. She complimented L-1 for speaking Russian without an accent, which was not the case with L-1's mother, the language teacher at the Sov Emb.\n\n5. Results of this conversation:\n\n   a. Alla LNU is in Mexico city less than a year. She is bored to death here and is looking forward to returning to Moscow as soon as she will be allowed.\n\n   b. She said that Mexico had a pleasant climate, but all she knows about Mexico is Oaxutla and even when she is invited there she has no company of her own (sic).\n\n   c. With regard to her schooling, after she finished\nhigh school she went to a school for mechanical technicians where she studied about a year and gave it up because she did not like it. She competed to enter the school of modern languages at the university but she failed. Then, she entered the K.I.M.O. (L-1 does not know what it stands for) and after 5 months she had to go to Mexico.\n\nd. L-1 told her that he would look her up occasionally and she appeared to be pleased with the idea.\n\ne. Description: apparent age 25 - 26; height about 5 ft 3 in (possibly less); hair light brown; very nice eyes (L-1 does not remember the color); build rather stout; face rather long; in general pleasant appearance.\n\n6. Before leaving L-1 left with her a note for LOG in which he stated that he can still be reached at the Institute between 1500 and 1600 hrs and at home and added his phone numbers and concluded that if he did not hear from LOG it would prove he had a friend who turned out to be no good.\n\n7. During L-1's waiting in the reception room Yuriy OMAHNIK passed by and they exchanged few un consequential words. L-1 asked YO did he give LOG the message he sent to LOG from that party (at Andrei's OMAHNO) and he said that he did it with pleasure and added few words of his own. When YO left L-1 asked Alla when was LOG leaving and she said LOG would leave in October '69.\n\n8. At 1510 hrs of the same day LOG phoned to L-1 in the Institute and after some verbiage they agreed to meet on Monday July 14 at the Marinera restaurant at 1500 hrs (AV Chapultepec with or near Liverpool). Both of them stated that they would be there without fail.\n\n9. With regard to the meet LOG - L-1 I repeated my previous instruction to L-1 concerning his attitude if LOG comes out again with the request to meet LIOVAL-L.\n\n10. With regard to L-1's acquaintance with Alla I suggested L-1 to ask his mother about her. There is a possibility of finding out her full\nname and whether she is married or not. L-1 should also mention to LOG the fact that he met Alla while waiting for him. Depending on the findings L-1 should consider inviting Alla to his house for lunch one Sat or Sun and take her with his wife and child to the Parque Asturiano to spend the afternoon. I told L-1 that I would pay for the expenses for lunch and possible entertainment. L-1 will discuss the matter with me before doing anything.\n\n11. L-1 reported that he had a 90 minutes talk with Karel VENIHL (see Attachment) and I debriefed him on the same. There were very few facts which were not covered in the previous report on VENIHL.\n\n12. As it became obvious that the working part of the meet was over L-1 stated that he would really feel bad and blow off his top if he did not see KARASUK until the end of the month. I told him that KARASUK had put a long period of work in the States and consequently his leave was extended for the same amount of time and I can spend that time where he pleased. L-1 commented that in that case he would extend the deadline of becoming nasty to Aug 20. I laughed. L-1 commented that probably I was not able to understand how much he was attached to KARASUK.\n\nMcPernald\nContact Report\nSubject: Jimmy SABRI P.13, FSD\nDate of meet: July 7 in Subject's car and Insurgentes Sambora's Her\n\n1. A meet was prearranged with Subject for July 7 at Del Paseo at 1400 hrs. Subject phoned to our office in the course of the morning to msg confirm the arrangement. (FERNALD was trying to reach Subject to change the place of meet, but he was not able to reach him). Subject did not show up at the Del Paseo and after waiting 40 minutes P went home (his office). At 1535 hrs P was informed by the office that Subject called several times and his latest statement was that he would be in front of the Cine Latino (across the Refrana from our Embassy). P came there on time but Subject was not around. Due to heavy rain P was bound to stay there and at 1630 hrs Subject showed up in an impressive Pontiac Boneville, blue with light top, plates WSD 735, Texas, Hemisfair (Black). Subject waved to P to get in the car.\n\n   Next meet: Friday July 11 at Boneville at 1400 hrs.\n\n   In the car Subject stated to P that he goofed, because he went to the restaurant where we met twice previously and after some waiting and picking he looked at his notebook and realized that he was at the wrong place. He apologized. Then, Subject stated that he had to return the Boneville and take another car and he asked P to have a ride with him. Subject took the car to Leibnitz and parked it in front of the apt building at 297. He excused himself for few minutes took newspapers, a small bundle and 2 miniature bottles of some liquor and entered the apt. About 5 minutes later he returned and we entered an old, beat up Valiant without license plates and the ride is hard to tell.\n\n2. During the first ride Subject told P that LCO phoned him on Friday July 4 and told him that they would have to postpone their test scheduled for the next day because he (LCO) would be out of town on Sat and Sun. P wanted to meet with Subject on Mon or Tue.\nand Subject told him that he would be taken and working with American businessmen who would arrive on Sunday. Subject added that they would bring a tennis hat for LOG (they did). LOG said that he would want to visit Josephine ALVAREZ, probably on Thursday July 10, but would phone him to arrange for a meet before coming to his (and Josephine's) apt. LOG also reminded Subject to prepare him for that meet a written report on the opinion of Mexican government officials about the Interamerican Economic Conference at Port of Spain.\n\n3. After returning from the apt Subject told P that LOG had phoned to Josephine and told her that he would visit them on Thursday a little after 2000 hrs and that he would bring to Josephine 2 bottles of Vodka.\n\n5. Then, Subject asked P when should he arrange for a meet with LOG, because in front of Josephine they do not speak about politics. P told Subject that the logical thing to do would be to take advantage of the social gathering with LOG to make arrangements for their next meet. Subject agreed and asked P whether our security people decided to give or not to give the directory to him for passing it LOG. P told Subject that he ceased the matter by bringing into the picture a nonexisting Patricia which we were not able to produce. Therefore, the first step is getting rid of Patricia, which means to get to the point of P's first instruction: Subject really has no close friend or contact in the U.S. Embassy and is willing to develop one if LOG insists on getting the directory. Subject is willing to follow LOG's instruction regarding how to go about it. With regard to \"Patricia\" Subject will have to state that she did not return from her leave and he does not know why.\n\n6. At that point Subject and P were already at the Diana Circle and Subject suggested that they stop for a drink in Insurgentes at Sanborns which is only a couple of blocks from his office and P agreed. They remained there about 50 minutes.\n\n7. Subject stated that the directory has become a problem.\ncommented that the existing problem was created by Subject and his not compliance with the instruction; the only way out of it now is to do what F told him in the car.\n\n9. In reply to F's question Subject stated that the 2 Americans who arrived here on Sunday July 6 were interested in investing capital in a low-income housing project for people of low income. He added that one of them is owner of a mining corporation and the other one is from the Beneficiary (if remembered correctly) Insurance Co. He believes that they were satisfied with the findings but it will take about a month before the deal materializes, because the approval of appropriate board was needed.\n\n9. Subject showed to F a calling card of Mr. C. Lester McGee (or MacGee), President of Moon Valley Mining Corporation, 3113 Oakland Ave (or Street), Dallas, Texas. There were at least two other addresses listed which F did not remember. Subject went on to say that Mr. MacGee was interested in buying platinum, but Subject told him that Mexico had no platinum and that once the Sovs were trying to sell a quantity in Mexico. Mr. MacGee told Subject to look into the matter and explained him the mechanics of the deal. Sovs would have to make a firm offer to a Swiss company which is controlled by a Canadian company which is in fact a subsidiary of an American company. Ultimate destination of the platinum is the U.S. Reportedly, the deal is all the way through a clean legal commercial transaction and terms of payment would be Irrevocable, Confirmed Letter of Credit, cash on delivery in Switzerland. The initial purchase would be 5,000 ounces but there is still to buy up to 1 million dollars worth of platinum. Subject asked F should he ask LOG are the Sovs interested in the deal.\n\n10. F told Subject he should tell about it to LOG if there is a commission for the person who facilitates the deal. According to Subject there is a U.S.L. commission per ounce if he can provide the goods. F told Subject he should express the desire that LOG obtain the info himself and if the answer is favorable and the price right then LOG can introduce Subject to the Sov official who will\nbe authorized to close the deal. Subject agreed to emphasize the attractiveness of the commission and the advantage of the fact that the deal is handled in Switzerland and consequently the commission is also paid there. F told Subject that he wanted to know in detail LOG's reaction concerning the commission. Subject should also play around with the theme that it would be ideal if LOG could travel to Switzerland to introduce him to the right person (Sov) and similar.\n\n11. Subject commented that the buyer is serious and it remains to be seen are the Sov willing to sell at a convenient for them but still fair price. Subject went on to say that if the deal was to go well he would have to go to Switzerland, and this arises another problem, i.e. how long would it take for him to get American Passport, because he is presently documented by his Birth Certificate. F told him to start thinking about passing that bridge when he comes to it.\n\n12. Subject appeared to be satisfied with F's attitude in the above conversation and he commented that with this matter showing up plus the tennis hat and the written report there should be enough for a meet with LOG. F told Subject that he wanted a carbon copy of the report he would hand to LOG and Subject promise to make one.\n\n13. Then, Subject observed that in order to place the business talk with LOG in the right perspective he would have to see LOG before Mr. McGee and his companion leave, which means the latest on Wed noon. F told him to go ahead and make arrangements which would be normal if he was trying to push the platinum deal, but if he gets to see LOG before Thur at his (Josephine) apt, he should advise F by phone, i.e. leave a message for F to ring him up.\n\n14. Comment by Fernald:\n\nb. Even if nothing comes out of the platinum deal, which is quite likely, conversation about it and the associated commission, should give us some reading on LOG on one hand and on the other shed more light on the personal relation between Subject and LOG.\n\nb. The so called social relation between Josephine and LOG is interesting, to say the least.\nATTACHMENT\nJuly 9, 1969\n\nSubject: Valentin LOGINOV (P-11,712)\n\nSource: Jimmy SABORI\n\n1. According to Source LOG phoned him on Friday July 4 at 1100 hrs and told that he would be out of town on July 5 and 6 and, consequently, would want to reschedule their meet. LOG proposed Monday or Tuesday and Source told him that he would be busy with some American businessmen. LOG concluded that he wanted to visit Josephine ALCAYAGA Segues this week and will do it probably on Thursday (July 10), but will phone earlier.\n\n2. According to Source LOG does not miss a week to give a ring to Josephine ALCAYAGA just to say Hello.\n\n3. During the phone conversation mentioned in para 11 above LOG reminded Source that he was interested in having next week in writing what Mexican officials thought about the American promises made at the Interamerican Economic Conference in Fort of Spain.\n\n4. The following are LOG's statements made to Source some of their previous meets:\n\n   a. LOG has a Life Insurance for 1 million Pesos with Monterrey Compania de Seguros, S.A. in Mexico City.\n\n   b. LOG told Source that it was good to have a friend \"on the other side\", meaning American side, because one can never tell what might happen.\n\n   c. LOG says not having money of his own.\n\n   Rfernald\nContact Report\nSubject: LIAOVIN-1 (7-4305)\nDate of Meet: July 2 at Paris-Mexico Restaurant at 1640 Hrs.\n\n1. Prescheduled meet to which Subject came on time and seeing me he drove around several blocks and returned to the prescheduled place 6 minutes later.\n   I paid L-1 $1,000 salary for June '69.\n   Next meet: July 9 with the pick up at the same place at 1615 hrs.\n\n2. L-1 told me about the evening he spent with LIOVAL-1 at the Sov show. He reported the matter exactly as LIOVAL-1 did and added that in spite of his intention to meet with some members of the Sov group he did not find time to do it.\n\n3. With regard to the visit he promised to make to LOGIKOV L-1 stated that he was not able to make up his mind in doing it, because he feared that LOG might suspect him for showing so much interest in him now and previously he was avoiding him. I repeated my request that he go and see LOGIKOV before we meet next week. He said he would do it on Friday July 4 at 1015 hrs.\n\n4. I told L-1 that I wanted him to do more writing for me in accordance with our previous agreement. He promised to do it, and I believe that while he is with me he seriously means what he says.\n\n5. As the Attach\u00e9 will show L-1 spoke about his talk with Erel WENTZL and he was instructed to obtain more info, especially factual info.\n\n6. I gave Subject his copy of the First Circle in Russian and he was pleased to get the book.\n\n7. L-1 is still living harmoniously with his wife and L-1 is convincing himself that he wants to live with his wife and does not want to give his her a reason for quarreling.\n\n8. I talked to L-1 about the meet that he associate with Sov.\n\nREMARKS\n\nJuly 5, 1969\nJuly 5, 1969.\n\nSubject: Valention LOGIOV - Bio Sketch by LIPACON-1\n\nRemarks:\n\n1. Concerning the problems which LOG has with his colleagues LIPACON-1 was not able to offer specific examples. In at least 3 instances LOG spoke to L-1 that the psychological atmosphere within the Sov Embassy is horrible and depressing. LOG stated that there was not a single person in the Embassy in which one can confide; everybody is ready to cut others throat just to advance; if there is nothing the colleagues can pin against a person they start intriguing hoping that one might lose his temper and commit something stupid which would be sufficient to harm the person involved; if one asks for advice he would in no time find out that he was considered incompetent.\n\nIn Fall 1968 L-1 invited LOG to attend a party and told him that Yuriy CHERNISH (P-13,042) would be there. LOG stated that he would not come, because it would mean or getting himself in trouble or getting CHERNISH in trouble; to keep away from Sov colleagues is the only of keeping out of troubles, concluded LOG.\n\n2. With regard to the statement that LOG was committing errors by exerting pressure on other people L-1 stated that he reported LOG's renewed attempt to recruit Miguel Angel. In doing so LOG abandoned his tact and ignored the sensitivity of the other person; LOG talk to L-1 in Cuautla took place in less than a month from LOG's pitch to Miguel Angel; the way LOG spoke to L-1 made it evident that LOG disregarded ops security rules. Such things did not happen before and L-1 concluded that LOG went all out to achieve some success before he leaves LPS: \"cost what it may\".\n\n3. When L-1 stated that he believed that LOG would be a good person under normal conditions, he meant that he believed that LOG is basically a good person and would be acting and behaving as a good person in his normal environment, i.e., if he remained as a truck on the farm, or he was a tractor driver or a truck driver and similar, because in such conditions LOG would do a good job and would not have to depend on rental capability which he does not have.\n4. L-1 does not know why LOG expresses such a great love and admiration for Spain and Spaniards. L-1 feels positive that LOG was never in Spain; he has no reason to believe that LOG did any extensive reading about Spain; in fact L-1 believes that LOG knows about Spain what he heard from Spaniards who live in the USSR and, apparently, he was associating with a number of them in Moscow.\nValentin Leginov\n\nEdad aproximada de 43-45 a\u00f1os, aunque aparenta menos. F\u00edsicamente de complecci\u00f3n atl\u00e9tica, alto. Juega muy bien al tenis. Recientemente qued\u00f3 en segundo lugar en el campeonato del D.F. que tuvo lugar en el Club Francia, donde practica este deporte. Cuida much\u00edsimo su condici\u00f3n f\u00edsica y m\u00e1s que nada su apariencia. En este sentido es muy vanidoso. Muy pocos amigos sabe que tiene una hija de 16-17 a\u00f1os. Cuando le preguntan si tiene hijos hable solo de su hijo de 11 a\u00f1os de edad. Le da pena presentar a su mujer, que es muy amable y buena, porque se ve de m\u00e1s edad que \u00e9l. No fuma, toma muy poco, aunque cuando la ocasi\u00f3n requiere de tomar mucho aguardiente y siempre se le ve sereno. Es muy amable en el trato. Nunca trata de imponer sus ideas, pero siempre pendiente de convencer por las buenas a sus contrincantes. Cuando ve que no puede hacer lo \u00faltimo, rompe diplom\u00e1ticamente las relaciones amistosas con el sujeto.\n\nEn sus ideas es de la escuela estalinista: solo cuenta lo Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica y la \u00faltima l\u00ednea a seguir del Partido. Eso quiere decir que no tiene ideas propias. Sigue rid\u00edculamente la \"l\u00ednea\" porque sabe muy bien que es la \u00fanica forma r\u00e1pida y eficaz de escalar en su carrera. Le gusta much\u00edsimo la vida buena, tipo occidental, aunque antes se dejar\u00eda cortar un brazo que confes\u00e1rselo as\u00ed mismo. Es muy ambicioso y se ve que tiene problemas con sus compa\u00f1eros de trabajo. Habla despectivamente de ellos. No le gusta nada la idea de tener que permanecer en Mosc\u00fa los dos a\u00f1os que vienen. Le dijo que har\u00eda lo posible que al transcurrir esos a\u00f1os lo mandaran de preferencia otra vez a M\u00e9xico. Su ilusi\u00f3n m\u00e1s grande es trabajar en Espa\u00f1a. Adora a los espa\u00f1oles. La forma de ser de los mejicanos no le gusta. Por eso si quiere regresar, quiere decir que prefiere cualquier lugar donde vivir, menos Rusia. Creo que precisamente\nporque ya tiene que partir en julio, es por lo que \u00faltimamente est\u00e1 cometiendo errores. Quiere hacer _[corto]_ a como de lugar, presionando a la gente de _[corto]_ que antes jam\u00e1s hac\u00eda. El d\u00eda 3 de mayo lo vi en Cuauht\u00e9moc, y sabiendo que yo no quiero trabajar para \u00e9l, me insisti\u00f3, llegando al extremo de preguntar si pod\u00edamos abordar a mi alumno John, sin seguir preguntar por la personalidad y forma de pensar de John. En los 15 minutos que estuvimos juntos no habl\u00f3 m\u00e1s que de eso. Cuando yo le dije que ya le hab\u00eda dicho antes que no me gustaba esa clase de trabajo, me contest\u00f3 que \u00e9l cre\u00eda que lo que me pasaba es que ten\u00eda miedo. La forma m\u00e1s inocente de hacerme picar! A continuaci\u00f3n, me invit\u00f3 a comer el d\u00eda 8 para seguir hablando de lo mismo. En el fondo creo que todo eso revela cierta inocencia y muchas ganas de progresar, para llevar una vida muy diferente a la que llevan los ciudadanos sovi\u00e9ticos. Creo que quiere dejar una gran impresi\u00f3n a sus jefes para no quedar trabajando indefinidamente en el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Mosc\u00fa. No s\u00e9 hasta qu\u00e9 punto sus ambiciones puedan guiarlo, a progresar incluso por medio de atropellar v\u00edctimas. Como persona y en condiciones normales me parece bueno, generoso y fiel amigo. Sin embargo la verdad es que nunca lo llegu\u00e9 a conocer muy bien, en parte posiblemente porque casi desde el principio sent\u00eda instintivamente que quer\u00eda algo de m\u00ed, muy aparte de nuestra amistad y en parte porque con todo y la confianza que llego a tener conmigo jam\u00e1s se descubri\u00f3 por completo, ni mucho menos. Es extensamente cauteloso.\n\nResumiendo: Mi impresi\u00f3n es que es una buena persona, de buenos sentimientos, pero que una vez metido en \"ese trabajo,\" por razones que desconocemos, hace todo lo posible por destacar.\nEdad aproximada de 43-45 a\u00f1os, aunque es una\npersona fuertemente de complejo atl\u00e9tico, alto.\nLleg\u00f3 muy lejos al f\u00fatbol. Directamente qued\u00f3 en el equipo\nde f\u00fatbol de su escuela del D.F. que tuvo lugar en\nel Club Franc\u00e9s, donde practic\u00f3 el deporte. Cuenta\nmuch\u00edsimos en condiciones finas y m\u00e1s que nada en\nf\u00fatbol. En este sentido es muy versado. Hizo\nmucho tiempo antes que tuviera una hija de 15-17 a\u00f1os,\ncuando le preguntaron si ten\u00eda hijos hab\u00eda una sola de su\nhijo de 15 a\u00f1os de edad. Le dijeron que ten\u00eda una\nhija, que es muy agradable y buena, pero se ve de\nm\u00e1s edad que \u00e9l. No parece, tiene muy poco, aunque\ncuando la cama se queda de tomar mucho aguardiente\ny nunca se le ve beber. Es muy agradable en el bote.\nHace tanto tiempo que no viene, pero siempre por\ndudar de conocerlo por las buenas a ver continuamente.\nCuando se ve un poco hace la \u00faltima, siempre y\nsiempre la \u00faltima, siempre se mueve con el bote.\nEn su casa es de la mejor. Hab\u00eda dos hijos de\nsu mujer, uno y la \u00faltima l\u00ednea de su padre.\nLe gustaba mucho el bote, pero nunca se le ve\u00eda\nbeber. Fue siempre un buen bote, pero nunca se\nve\u00eda beber. En su casa se ve\u00eda siempre la mesa\nbien cubierta, aunque nunca se ve\u00eda comer en ella.\nfuera la escena en sus brazos. La muchacha, que llevaba la primavera en sus mejillas, caminaba hacia el puente que al trancarse en medio de la orilla, prisionero de la brisa, se dirig\u00eda.\n\nLa muchacha se detuvo en el puente. Al verla, la muchacha se puso en pie. Por suavemente, lentamente, se puso en pie. Luego, se dirigi\u00f3 hacia el puente, que se iba desvaneciendo en el horizonte. Al final, se despidi\u00f3 de la muchacha, envuelta en la brisa, que se iba desvaneciendo en el horizonte.\nNo se trata de hacer un an\u00e1lisis, pero en general, a pesar de que no se ha mencionado a ning\u00fan individuo en particular, la verdad es que nunca he llegado a conocer muy bien, en parte por el mismo hecho de que no he tenido el placer de estar en contacto con \u00e9l. En parte de nuestra amistad y en parte porque con todos y la confianza que lleg\u00f3 a tener en m\u00ed, fue dif\u00edcil, pero mucho menos...\n\nLa informaci\u00f3n contaba...\n\nSin embargo, mi impresi\u00f3n es que ha una buena parte de buenos resultados, pero que... en una regla de... en este trabajo, por supuesto que... en... hace...\nContact Report\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI\nDate of Meet: July 1 at Sepo-Paris at 1000 hrs\n\n1. This meet was held in lieu of the one scheduled for June 30 at 1400 hrs. Subj requested the postponement of the meet by phone on grounds that LOGINOV did not show up for the meet on June 25 and another meet with him was arranged by phone and will take place on June 30 at 1400 hrs. FERNALD phoned to Subject the same day of his call and arranged to see him at Sepo-Paris restaurant at 1900 hrs. F who came to the meet place 5 minutes earlier found Subject there waiting for him. The meet lasted 5 hours in spite of the fact that F paid the bill 2 hours before Subject decided to leave.\n\nNext meet: Monday July 7 at the Del Parso at 1400 hrs. Note: F will change the meet place to a more modest restaurant.\n\n2. Subject immediately asked what was the decision concerning the Emb directory which LOGINOV was asking for. F told Subject that the directory was his last worry and that he would like to hear how did the things go with LOGINOV. Subject started speaking about the meet (see separate attach.) By the time Subject was through with his description of the meet, F obtained a more convenient table and as we moved to it. F requested Subject to write additional data to his FSQ-I which he did promptly. Then F asked him to write the chronology sequence of his contacts with LOGINOV which Subject did by looking in his agenda and he did it without hesitation.\n\n3. At this point Subject told F that he had seen him in the vicinity of the place where he met with LOGINOV. F stated that he was there and that the purpose of being there was that Subject see him. He asked did F also see LOG and F stated that when he saw LOG coming he moved in the direction from which Subject was coming. F concluded by saying that the fact that F was there himself should be sufficient to assure Subject that we keep operational matters restricted to a minimum of persons for reasons of security.\n\n4. F looked at what Subject wrote concerning his meet with LOG.\nand told Subject that according to the phone message he left for F it appeared that LOC did not come to the meet scheduled for June 25 and not as he put it on paper. Subject repeated what he wrote and confirmed that on June 20 LOC did not show up and on June 25 LOC did not come and Subject did not show up (LICRA surveillance confirmed the latter statement). F observed that on his first meet with Subject on June 23 Subject said that he had a meet with LOC on June 25 and told him that he had no time to try to get the directory. Subject showed no embarrassment and he told F that he must have misunderstood Subject's statement.\n\n5. F told Subject that he did not follow F's instruction in speaking to LOC about the directory, specifically, by bringing up a name of Patricia which created a problem without which he would be much better off. The fact is that Subject knows nobody in the U.S. Embassy. Subject was of the opinion that we can always introduce him to a person in the Emb who can play the role of being his acquaintance. F told Subject that we were not pulling rabbits out of a hat and all our actions were conducted within limits of security. That Subject was suggesting was a complete disregard for our as well his own security and the best thing he can tell LOC on their next meet was that \"Patricia\" did not show up as yet.\n\n6. It may be noted that F's attempt to debrief Subject on what transpired at each of his meets with LOC did not bear desired results. Subject stated the facts he mentioned to F on their first meet and started repeating himself as he was going on. Therefore, F decided to get as detailed as possible description of the last meet and Subject was cooperative. Although, Subject spoke about the last meet at the beginning of our meet he did not seem trying putting it in sequence as it took place. From what Subject stated previous meets it may be worthwhile noting that Subject had a party at his apt on June 10 and he asked LOC to come to the party. LOC explained Subject that he did not like to be seen in large groups and he sent Subject 2 bottles of Vodka for the party. Subject also stated that in 2-3 instances he promised LOC to bring him a tennis hat from the U.S. Actually, LOC would like to have 2 tennis hats, one with a visor and the other type with a rip around, size large. Subject had an opportunity of doing it, but at the proper moment he forgot about it. LOC still brings up the fact that Subject forgot about him and\nhis hate. Subject asked if it was possible to get those hats for him. F said he did not know if it can be done.\n\n7. Subject asked F what type of a reception will be given on the 4th of July by the Emb and was there something arranged that any American could drop in, as signing the book at the Emb. F promised to phone to Subject in case there was something like that.\n\n8. After covering the ground as contained in the 3 attachments F asked Subject was he willing to back his statements with a polygraph test (F used the expression 'lie detector test'). Subject reacted by asking when did we want him to take the test. F commented that he did not say that Subject would be given one, he only asked would he be willing to take one, if we asked him to do it. Subject stated that he was willing to take the test at any time. Then, he started asking questions about the test, especially, who usually gets it and how it works. With regard to who gets F stated that anyone involved in matters having bearing on the security of the U.S. and as to how it works, there is nothing to it; it registers when a person says a lie as the stomach digests automatically anything a person eats.\n\n9. Comments by FERNALD:\n\na. This meet enables us to have a better insight of Subject's personality.\n\nb. There are valid indications that Subject is not withholding important info concerning his personal history nor his activity.\n\nc. His claim to have numerous and to an extent influential contacts appears to be acceptable.\n\nd. He also appears to be cooperative, but has a tendency to deviate from the instruction given to him concerning his attitude toward OCCINC. It is possible that this is due to his conviction that he knows OCCINC better than we do and that we are too dogmatic and not enough flexible. At the same time this may be due to the fact that he loves clandestine activity for the sake of pleasure he gets out of the game as such on one hand and on the other, he might fear that our proposed course of action may alienate OCCINC from him, in which case he would be left without a game he likes.\n\ne. It appears quite obvious that Subject's financial conditions are not good, but, apparently, he has a scatter, is well dressed and does not have to worry about being hungry. Therefore there is left enough room for him to lead the life he pleases.\n\nFERNALD\nTorneo Mixto de Tenis en el Club France\n\nEl Torneo Mixto de Tenis 1969 \"AMISTAD\", que concluy\u00f3 en d\u00edas pasados, estuvo muy animado.\n\nEl organizador de este evento deportivo fue Adri\u00e1n Aguilar, para despedir a Valentin Longinov, quien pr\u00f3ximamente partir\u00e1 al extranjero.\n\nResultaron triunfadores: Hans Kasperek, Beatriz Bacon y Vicky Aguilar. En este grupo, el doctor Luis Torres, Nils de Correa, Bill Bacon, Ruben Rojas, Gloria de Pinto, Adri\u00e1n Aguilar, Valentin Longinov y Ruth Wiegand obtuvieron el primero, segundo y tercer lugares, respectivamente.\n\nPor la noche, los esposos Pinto, Jos\u00e9 y Gloria ofrecieron una fiesta en su residencia, donde fueron entregadas los trofeos. Aqu\u00ed las fotos...\n\n1: Hans Kasperek, Beatriz Bacon y Vicky Aguilar.\n2: En este grupo, el doctor Luis Torres, Nils de Correa, Bill Bacon, Ruben Rojas, Gloria de Pinto, Adri\u00e1n Aguilar, Valentin Longinov y Ruth Wiegand.\n3: Los ganadores del Torneo. Hans Kasperek, Beatriz Bacon, Vicky Aguilar, Valentin Longinov, Nils de Correa.\nContact Report\n\nSubject: James SABORI\nDate of Meet: June 23 at Subject's Apt at Bahia de Sta Barbara 20/306\n\n1. Arrangements for this meet were made through the office and the fact that the phone which Subject left with our office was out of order made it necessary that FERNALD call on Subject at his apt. It may be noted that Subject is in the process of moving and the only furniture in the living room of the above mentioned apt consisted of two beaten up easy chairs w/o arm rest and a sort of an end table loaded with papers and a telephone; another phone was on the floor in the corner of the room. There was so much dust on the floor that it is difficult to believe that the apt was in any use during the last 10 days.\n\n2. Subject's NEW ADDRESS: Leibnitz 297 apt 7 phone 31-53-93\n   Office: Fraccionadora de Bajio, Insurgentes Sur 429 office 12\n   (first floor), phone 64-63-47.\n   Subject can be reached home until 0930 in the morning and in the office between 1100 and 1400 hrs and in the afternoon between 1700 and 2000 hrs. Subject stated that it would be rather difficult to find him in his office because of his frequent \"in and out\" work.\n\n3. CONVO with us; Subject was told that once he was placed in contact with the \"proper people\" he should use from now on the extension 670. He will identify himself as Sr. ARIZCO (allegedly his mother's surname) and will ask for Sr. Virgil (BALDINI) FERNALD alias.\n\n4. FERNALD showed Subject his official looking credentials under alias of Virgil Z. BALDINI and after he read them quite carefully, FERNALD stated that now Subject knew that he was speaking to the right person and Subject commented that he was satisfied with his bona fide.\n\n5. I first asked Subject few personal questions; the phone is out of order because he requested that it be transferred to his new apt and on Saturday (June 21) when he saw that the phone was not in operation he called \"his friend Carlos RICART\" to put pressure on the Telephone Co. but nothing could be done in view of the week-end; the elevator in the\nbuilding is often out of order, because there are too many children in the building; Subject is married and has 2 children, but he is presently separated from his wife; as the children finished the High School his wife wanted them to continue their schooling in the U.S.; Subject avoided specifying what school his children attended here and called the school \"the American High School; Subject has been in Mexico 4 years and his wife only 2 years; as much as he loves Mexico so much his wife did not get used to Mexico and did not want to remain any longer here; the fact that he did not want to leave Mexico resulted in their physical separation; according to Subject it is only a matter of days that his family left for San Jose, California, which Subject called his home town; Subject claims that his family (paternal side) comes from Milan, Italy; his great-grandfather came to New York, NY, and followed the gold rush to California where he apparently did well; for reasons unknown to Subject his grand father moved from California to Arizona and then to Mexico (Sinaloa) where Subject's father was born; in the same breath Subject stated that he, too, was born in Mexico and when I commented that it would be logical that he have a dual citizenship, Subject did quite bit of talking to confuse the the previous statement; during the revolution all the records were burned and he has only the certificate of baptism issued by a Mexican church and in fact it was possible that he was born on the U.S. side of the border; Subject claims he could not care less about the possibility of claiming Mexican citizenship, he is an American and it suits him well to live in this country as a TOURIST; in the Fraccionadora de Pajio he works with a partner, who entered the company as owner of 2 large chunks of land; Subject had no money but he is the person who through his connections obtained from a Mexican bank a decision that the bank would mortgage up to 90 per cent every structure he and his partner complete; now he is in the stage of obtaining American investment capital to carry out the construction of low income housing (I do not recall the location Subject mentioned); of course Subject went through financial difficulties and is still facing some of them, but nothing serious; he has a car of his own; he is moving out of this apt and will sub-let it and make few hundred pesos per month on the difference of present price and what he is paying; this type of transactions cannot get him in trouble, because Mexicans do not care about such things; he has a friend in the Sernacion\nwho once showed him that the Government had more than a foot high file on him and Subject told him they should not bother trying to do something against him because they cannot even kick him out of the country; he has a friend to whom he is authorized to turn if he is in any kind of trouble and he asked his Government to dial the phone which he gave him and the phone was answered by CENRCS of the Presidency; Subject claims that he has influential friends in practically every ministry (Secretaria) of the Federal government; Subject also prides himself with women friends he has and they are also influential.\n\n6. In answer to the question Subject stated that he called on Mr. [redacted] at the U.S. Embassy because he had a fairly close relation with Valentin LOGINOV (P-11,712) of the Soviet Embassy and he would not want to be judged wrongly if the GOVERN people get to know about his friendly relation with LOGINOV.\n\n7. F commented that he hoped that Subject realized that the title on his credentials really spells Counter Intelligence, which, for example, means that if F saw Subject robbing a bank he could not care less because that would be the matter concerning the criminal police, or if was charged for having a child out of wedlock, because that would be a matter for the judiciary authority, but when it comes to spies then that is a matter which concerns F and the service he is working for. In view of the well established fact that LOGINOV is a spy and Subject is his friend (sic) this matter is of concern for the American Counter Intelligence. Therefore, would appreciate if Subject stated clearly what was the purpose of his visit to the U.S. Embassy. Subject answered without hesitation nor embarrassment that he believed that he made himself clear even at the Embassy that he wanted to cooperate with the U.S. Service and be of help as much as it stood in his power. F commented that he would probably ask Subject does he still want to help the U.S. Counter Intelligence before we close our next today.\n\n8. In reply to F's questions Subject stated:\n\na. He met LOGINOV at a social party in the house of Dr. Frederico PARIN, who is as is commonly known a Communist by his ideology. He does not know were there other Soviet officials at the party. LOGINOV first\nspoke to Subject in a heavy accented broken English and was delighted when Subject suggested that they speak Spanish. LOGINOV's general line of conv was that the essential thing in life is understanding and to be able to understand others one must get to know them; this in turn calls for having as many friends as possible. The same applies to countries and nations. Before leaving the party LOGINOV stated that he would like to become friendly with Subject and asked him would he be willing to meet with him. Subject agreed and they met next Friday at the Tecali Restaurant.\n\nb. The conv at the Tecali was to an extent dealing with the theme of friendship and understanding with an added emphasis that if there was understanding and, consequently, friendship between the U.S. and Soviet Union we would be living in a much better world. Subject stated his agreement with LOGINOV's views. In a further part of the conv LOGINOV was interested in knowing whether Subject had many friends in Mexico. Subject claims to have stated that he had many good friends here. (Note: It is quite likely that he bragged about the number of influential friends he had here). At the end LOGINOV told Subject that he would like to see him again and Subject asked him to come to his house. According to Subject, LOGINOV asked would not the fact of receiving a Sov official compromise Subject or lead him into some kind of troubles. Subject assured him that the receiving of a Sov or any foreign official could not affect him in no way. Then, LOGINOV asked Subject would they be alone and Subject answered affirmatively. (Note: At this point Subject indicated that he received LOGINOV at the apt at the Jelititz 297). Finally, LOGINOV agreed to come to Subject's apt.\n\nc. In the apt LOGINOV did not feel at ease for some time. Initially, he did not drink from the Vodka which\nSubject poured and he drank only after Subject took a sip out of LOG's glass (Remark: This certainly sounds exaggerated). During the evening LOG was repeatedly speaking about his need to have friends make new new friendships and was pointing out that Subject was able to help in that respect. Subject stated to LOG that he offered to LOG to introduce him to any friend of his he wished. In the course of conversation LOG was asking Subject various questions concerning politics, economy, and trade in Mexico and Subject was answering with a degree of familiarity with topics. LOG felt that Subject was well informed and he asked him how come that he was so well informed, is he perhaps a WOIRI man. Subject laughed at the question and added that in fact he hated WOIRI and everything associated with it. LOG gave Subject his phone (apparently the cell phone) and told Subject that he should not be phoning to him and that it was better if they agreed in advance when and where they would meet next.\n\nd. From this point Subject gave up describing chronologically the developments. He stated that there were about 10 additional meetings with LOG. The place they used most extensively was the La Cava. They usually were meeting at 2000 hrs, i.e., the time when the restaurants have the minimum of guests. Subject believed that LOG started using La Cava more frequently for their meet because of the fact that the recall closed.\n\ne. Subject stated that out of pure curiosity he observed LOG coming to their meeting place. LOG leaves his car 5 - 7 blocks away from the place, boards a bus, gets out a block beyond the meeting place and comes walking slowly and making occasional stops to observe whether he was followed. Then they get in a restaurant together, gives a good look to every person in the restaurant and remains especially watchful if he sees two men together.\n1. Subject stated that the leitmotif of LOC during these\nmeetings was \"help me and I will be able to help you\",\n\"get me (or provide me with) the info I need and I will\nprovide you with info you might need\". Among the most\nsought info by LOC was personality info on Mexican\npoliticians and, especially, indications as to who\nwill be the next President of Mexico. LOC is very\nmuch interested does ECHAVARRIA stand a better chance\nto become the next President than ECHAVEZ PRIETO.\nLater it became an obsession to find out what was\nREAL reason for Rockefeller's trip to LA countries.\nLOC discounted the fact-finding as any reason, because,\naccording to him the U.S. embassies and the CIA in\nthose countries know everything that is to be known.\nConsequently, LOC is convinced that there must an\nimportant reason for ROCKEFELLER's trip. Subject added that\nthere were many other minor questions concerning the\nMexican scene which interested LOC and to a fair\nextent he was able to get the answers. Nevertheless,\nLOC started asking Subject did he have friends in the\nU.S. Embassy here. Subject was answering casually\nwith an \"of course\". On the meet Subject had with\nLOC on June 9 at La Cava LOC told him that he needed\nan Embassy phone directory and he asked Subject can\nhe get him one. Subject promised to try. LOC brought\nto Subject's attention that he needed the \"HW directory\nbecause the Embassy changes the directory every six\nmonths.\n\n2. In reply to 78 question Subject stated that LOC told\nhim that he needed all the info he was asking for to\nadvance politically in his career on one hand and on\nthe other to dispel misunderstanding to which the\nlack of info may easily lead.\n\n3. With regard to LOC Subject described him as a likeable\nperson with quite liberal view on international pol-\nitics; he passionately hates Krushchov and is\ndeeply concerned over the danger Red China represents to the world; he advocates that the U.S. and Sov Union should design a mutual defense pact and liquidate the China until there is still time; he believes that Sov Union and the U.S. are entitled to act in defense of their own interests and \"to hell with what the rest of the world says\"; he admires the determination and dynamism of Americans.\n\n9. After getting through this portion P told Subject does he still feel that he should get and give LCG the Emb Phone Directory. He stated that he was willing to do what we told him to do, but he believed that if he came to the meet with LCG on June 25 without the directory, LCG would consider him as worthless, since he was not able to obtain something which he can get in some other way. Then P commented that the directory was a tightly controlled matter and to get one would practically mean to swipe one from somebody else. Subject stated that he was convinced that LCG would not care for a directory which he stole, because he is interested in subject having a friend in the embassy through whom he would have access to info, and presenting the directory would be an indication that Subject had a friend there.\n\n10. Then Subject replied negatively to a theoretical possibility of obtaining a directory \"legally\", P told him that he must necessarily be aware of the fact that LCG would not be satisfied with a statement that he obtained the directory from a woman or man friend; LCG would insist in knowing the name and the address of the person who is his friend. Subject pretended not to be convinced about this but did not try to argue about it.\n\n11. Then P told Subject that whether he admits it to himself or not that he was trying to maneuver himself into was a double agent role which is by no means an enviable role. A person who is offering his cooperation to the U.S. under such conditions should be aware that every piece of info passed to the opposition, in this case LCG, must be cleared and approved by an U.S. officer which, if nothing else, is a time consuming proposition. Subject replied said \"time is money\". P commented that only productively used time is money.\n12. In a heavy and serious tone P stated that he must ask now subject whether after the explanation he gave he is still willing to cooperate with the U.S. Service under the condition that he would follow our instruction and guidance without any reserve. Subject answered YES and added that he was ready and willing to do whatever we tell him to do.\n\n13. P asked Subject did LCG tell him when he was leaving Mexico. Subject stated that LCG did not mention his departure and Subject felt certain that there was no immediate departure in sight.\n\n14. P told Subject that he would want him to think this matter over and discuss it with some of his colleagues and, therefore, would like to see him tomorrow. Subject stated that he would be busy in the morning and when P asked him what about the afternoon, Subject asked what about having a lunch together. P agreed and picked up LCG at the place and it was agreed that they would meet in the restaurant at 1400 hrs.\n\n15. P feels that Subject is a sort of a Soldier of Fortune, a pleasant and long talker; among his Mexican contacts not mentioned above are D. Figueira and Augustin BARRIOS Gomez. To impress P with closeness of his relations with BARRIOS Gomez, Subject showed P ASOC annual pass for all the movie houses in town and added that ASOC gave him the pass. This fact might be interesting but it does not dispel the temptation to consider Subject to be a name dropper.\n\nBruce H. Fernald\n\nP.S. Subject mentioned that LCG gave him some caviar and vodka. P connected that Subject should not be surprised if P told him that we knew about it.\n\nIn speaking about the directory P told Subject that he, and LCG as well, would realize that we can take out extra no extra codes and that we have all those lists and all the codes (to the embassy) and all those who to help.\n\nInscription on a Jelapa Madhouse.\nContact Report\n\nSubject: LIMACO-1 (P-4305)\n\nDate of Report: June 21 at the Cafeteria JET at 1100 hrs.\n\n1. This meet was held in lieu of the prearranged meet for June 13 which L-1 cancelled by phone. Due to the peculiarities of L-1's working habits I was not able to reach him by phone until June 20 at 1600 hrs. when this meet was arranged.\n\n   Next meet: Wednesday July 2 at 1615 hrs at the previous pick up place.\n\n2. On June 16 L-1 was without car and he felt obliged to cancel the meet. He stated that he felt happy to have made up with his wife and to be living again at home. He told me about his arrangement to go to the Russian show with LIOVAL-1 and wife. He described me the developments as LIOVAL-1 reported them to me.\n\n3th With regard to his 2 \"contact\" with LOGINOV which he hinted by phone, there was nothing to it. L-1 was at a party given by Andrea CATANO (P-13,545) on June 14 at her house and YURIY CHERNISH (P-13,042) was there and they exchanged few words about LOGINOV (see the attachment). L-1 stated that he was not with LOGINOV since the encounter in Cunilla and did not speak to him since the attempt to reschedule the lunch which was missed on May 8. Therefore, the story L-1 gave to LIOVAL-1 on June 13 about LOGINOV being disappointed with the fact that he had to return home, etc., is quite likely, no connection with any recent developments.\n\n   Further, it is quite obvious that L-1 did not know then about the fact that LOGINOV was postponed 3 - 4 months.\n\n4. L-1 stated that A. CATANO and her mother told him that they had expected EKATYREV (P-11,751) to attend their party, but he neither came nor excused himself by phone. L-1 did not know how it came to the point that EKATYREV was invited to the party. L-1 considered it as a significant fact that CHERNISH came to that party with his wife. L-1 interpreted this fact to the effect that CHERNISH gave up the idea of having a romance with ANDREA CATANO, but wanted to preserve and maintain friendship with her and her family. According to L-1 it is quite certain\nATTACHMENT\nJune 22, 1969\n\nSubject: LOGINOV (P-11,712)\n\nSource: LIBACON-1 (P-4903)\n\n1. On June 14 Yuriy CHERNISH (P-13,042) told Source that LOGINOV's departure from Mexico was postponed to October or November (L-1 does not remember which month to stated).\n\n2. L-1 requested CHERNISH to tell LOGINOV that L-1 was disappointed with LOGO's attitude toward him; he promised to call him and he never did.\n\n3. CHERNISH promised to relay the message and commented that LOGO should have more time for his friends now that he does not have the work which every departure and moving bring with them.\n\nComment: L-1 was told he should try to contact LOGO himself and instead of using other persons as messengers. Once more he promised to do it in a matter of days.\n\nREP.\n20 June 1969\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: James SABORI\n\n1. At 1300 hours on 20 June Subject, on the recommendation of Bob JOHNSON (formerly with LNEGO in Guadalajara), came to the Embassy and contacted COS. Subject apparently has known JOHNSON and had asked JOHNSON to whom he could talk in the Embassy about a delicate matter. JOHNSON had recommended COS, identifying him only as a First Secretary.\n\n2. Subject identified himself as an insurance salesman who is in Mexico as a tourist and who apparently hopes to do some business here. He is of Italian origin and apparently has lived in Texas and California. At the present time, he is living at Bahia de Santa Barbara #20, apartment 308. Telephone number is 31-53-93.\n\n3. Subject's story was that he has been in contact with Valentin LOGINOV (P-11, 112) (he showed COS LOGINOV's card) and, as a matter of fact, has had no less than 12 contacts with him. He is scheduled to have dinner with LOGINOV tonight (20 June) at 2000 hours but he would not say where as he was afraid that COS would contact the CIA people and surveil him. He is also scheduled to have dinner with LOGINOV on 25 June. In the past, they have had dinner at such places as La Cava and the other Tocalli Restaurant.\n\n4. Subject refused to say very much about the nature of his contact with LOGINOV. His reason for contacting COS was to get a copy of the latest Embassy phone directory, which LOGINOV had asked him for. He wanted to bring it to LOGINOV so that LOGINOV would do things for him. He did not say exactly what LOGINOV could do for him except that LOGINOV had invited him to visit the Soviet Union. LOGINOV has also given him several bottles of vodka. He was not worried about what LOGINOV could get out of him because, after all, he was just an insurance salesman. In other words, he seemed to be enjoying playing games with LOGINOV and was not particularly ready to cooperate with us. COS said that he would have to contact the \"proper people\" to see about the phone book. Subject asked COS to do that and said that he would call COS at 1800 hours on 20 June to get the answer. He also said that if the \"proper people\" were interested, they could contact him at the address and phone number given above.\n5. When Subject calls at 1800 hours, he will be told that COS has gotten in touch with the \"proper people\" and that a representative of these people will call Subject on 23 June. As for the phone book, COS will say that this is entirely out of his hands and that the man who contacts Subject on 23 June will presumably deal with that.\n\n6. My plan at present is to have Bruce H. FERNALD (P) call Subject on 23 June and attempt to get as much of a debriefing as possible without being hostile or aggressive. I am looking at the long-range possibilities here because, unless there are unexpected developments, it is probably too late to use this against LOGINOV. However, if Subject has really been cultivated so assiduously by LOGINOV, the chances are that LOGINOV will turn him over to his successor, assuming that Subject continues to show the promise that he has apparently shown thus far. I want FERNALD to get as much as he can out of Subject without either frightening Subject away from LOGINOV or ruining the possibility of future cooperation against LOGINOV's successor. As for the phone book, I have no intention of passing it, at least without knowing a lot more about what is going on. Subject can be told and can pass on to LOGINOV that this is a tightly controlled publication and that it will not be very easy to come by (that is, unless he manages to steal one on his own). Also, if Subject (who is, at least to our current knowledge, unwitting of COS' affiliation) mentions COS' name to LOGINOV, LOGINOV's appetite may be greatly wetted to find out that his new contact has gone right to the top.\n\n7. There are no Station traces on Subject.\n\n8. Subject called at 1800 hours 20 June. He was given the message in paragraph 5 and agreed to await a call from \"the proper people\" at 0900 hours on 23 June. He also agreed to stall on the phone book.\n\nVincent P. RIZZUTO\n\nFile: P-11,712\nSECRET\n\n17 June 1969\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: LIREALM-1 CONTACT WITH ADEIHERD.\n\n1. The attached report from LIREALM-1 was received on 16 June 1969. LIREALM-1 verbally added the following comments to the information in the report:\n\na. Although they have not attended any social functions together since their last encounter, it is LIREALM-1's opinion that ADEIHERD is generally avoiding direct contact with him. Only once since LIREALM-1 told ADEIHERD that he was insulted by ADEIHERD's request that LIREALM-1 work for him has ADEIHERD asked LIREALM-1 to play tennis. LIREALM-1 has seen ADEIHERD on various occasions at the French Club, but neither have made any effort to speak to the other.\n\nb. ADEIHERD requested permission to bring a Mexican couple to the 21 June guards dinner. This was a strange request since the party was intended to include only those who had participated in the tennis tournament at the Club. Permission was granted, however, and LIREALM-1 will attempt to determine the identity of the Mexican couple at the party.\n\nc. Both LIREALM-1 and his wife are convinced that ADEIHERD is avoiding introducing his Soviet friend to the friends of LIREALM-1's wife. She has placed herself in a position, on a couple of occasions, where ADEIHERD had to be almost impolite in not introducing his friend to LIREALM-1's wife, but he has chosen not to do so.\n\n2. Based on the instructions given LIREALM-1 after the last incident between him and ADEIHERD, he has not gone out of his way to engage ADEIHERD in conversation or cultivate him socially. This might explain ADEIHERD's standoffishness and/or his apparent unwillingness to introduce his new friend. More information on this subject will be available after the 21 June dinner.\n\nDistribution:\n1 cy to C/53\n1 cy P-11185\n\nAndrew E. PELLEGRINI\n\nP 11, 712\nSUBJECT: NEW SOVIET AT FRENCH CLUB\nDATE OF INFO: 26 MAY 86\nSOURCE: MRS. JOHN FRANCIS\n\nValentin was seen playing with a Soviet. The Soviet is new to the club and a beginner at tennis.\n\nHe has a mustache, dark hair, is somewhat shorter and thinner than Val.\n\nOne might assume that this is Val's replacement observer at the French Club, if this was Val's assignment.\n\n(4 Jun w/o Val)\n\nSubject has been seen occasionally at the club since the above report, but with no regular pattern. Val has made no attempt to introduce him.\n\nSaturday, 21 June. This will be a combination farewell party for Val and the award dinner for our tennis group. Val will receive a cup for winning third place in our mixed doubles tournament. The party will be at the home of the Pinos.\n\nJ.F.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LIONEL-1 (T-)\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 11 June 1969\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\n1. As arranged last month, I picked Subject up on the corner of Nilo and Holchor Campo lateral at 1100. We drove to the Tastee Freeze in Polanco for coffee and not until 1300. Next meeting will be on 9 July at 1100, same pick-up place.\n\n2. Subject seems like a real diamond in the rough with earthy and sensible philosophy. I was surprised at his promptness and the fact that he doesn't forget meeting dates, even though they're arranged a month ahead and there's no confirmation. He told me that he frequently gives away candy and stuff to the little Sov kids who come in, feeling that they'll remember it years from now when they're fed a line of propaganda about the West and that this will make an impression and help offset all the bad things they hear.\n\n3. I brought with me the Soviet mug flash cards to have Subject identify those who come into his store frequently and whom he refers to by his own personal crypts (since he usually doesn't know their names). Following is the key to identifications:\n\n\"The Professor\": AITANOFF\n\"Boris\": PODLESNOY\n\"Pablo\": KOVALY\n\"Tito Espa\u00f1ol\": SOKOLOV\n\"Valentin\": LOGINOV\n\"Administrator\": KIRITTOV\n\nThere are also other who come to the store but who have no fixed\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOMIN (P-7152)\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 11 June 1969\n\nDesignations:\n\n4. Subject had the following comments and observations to make as we went through the cards:\n\nSOLOMATIN (P-7152): departing POS on 28 June 1969. He's suffering with an ulcer. He takes sleeping pills constantly and has been complaining about the great amount of work he has. Said his mother in the USSR (who neither smokes nor drinks) is very religious. She keeps a picture of Christ hidden at home and many of her women friends come to pray in front of it. SOLOMATIN did not come to Subject's house for dinner on 1 June as planned because he couldn't get permission. SOLOMATIN's wife will have 3 months off when they return to the USSR in order to rest up from her work here, but SOLOMATIN will have only 22 days off. He's going to take charge of some wood working shops with lathes and other machinery.\n\nPOLECHNY (P-1238): mild, speaks very little Spanish.\n\nSCHWARTZ (P-6372): speaks very good Spanish. Very aggressive and not very pleasant.\n\nFLEISCHER (P-6370): strikes subject as affable.\n\nHERRMANN (P-6370): about to leave, replacement not known.\n\nHERRMANN (P-6370): his wife is a doctor.\n\nSCHWARTZ (P-6372): nice guy; speaks good Spanish; decent diplomatic and gentlemanly type.\n\nLEVIN (P-6372): very much guy. Likes obscene pictures.\n\nLEVIN (P-6372): his wife is a member of the secret police.\n\nLEVIN: on 10 May, two private cars came into the store. One spoke very good Spanish, and I subject to a coiled a...\nDiplomatic World\n\nUS Embassy Wives' Meet Set for Monday\n\nBy MARIA SOCORRO PEREZ GARCIA\n\nThe next meeting of the U.S. Embassy Wives Group will be at 10 a.m. Monday in the chancery of the embassy, Reforma 205, featuring a talk on Mexican archaeology and art. The new staff of the group is: honorary chairman, Mrs. Henry Dearborn; chairman, Mrs. George Rylander; and vice chairman, Mrs. Morris Rothenberg.\n\nMembers of the Consular Corps headed by Leander P. Younkins will give a farewell party for U.S. consul Antonio Cerestino and Russian consul Valentina S. Leopoldina at 6 p.m. today in the American Club, Guadalajara. The Soviet Union and U.S. consuls have completed their duties here and will return to their countries soon.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LIROCKET-1\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 29 May 1969 at Paris en Mexico\nNext meeting is 26 June same place at 1300 hours\n\n1. Subject had little to report. His notes on two sessions\n   with KAZANTSEV are attached. KAZANTSEV said that he had no news\n   on his departure and now thinks he will probably have to stay in\n   Mexico until a new ambassador is appointed.\n\n2. Subject called NIKITIN once and was not able to get ahold\n   of him. He has not tried again but I asked him to keep at this. I\n   showed Subject photos of most of the Soviet officials. He recognized\n   a good many of them by fact if not by name and made the following\n   comments on some of them:\n\n   a. PRIKHODKO (P-22/0) - Speaks English and was going to\n      take lessons from Subject but never got around to it.\n\n   b. TUCHININ (P-3390) - Sees him occasionally; not very\n      friendly.\n\n   c. GORDEYEV (P-13,091) (Subject knew his name) - Speaks\n      English quite well; wanted to take lessons from Subject but\n      could not get Embassy to pay for the lessons.\n\n   d. CHMYKHOV (P-6235) - Has seen him fairly frequently but\n      does not know him. Appears unfriendly.\n\n   e. BOLSHAKOV (P-13,430) - Subject says he is the new guard.\n\n   f. BOGATYREV (P-11,381) - Every time Subject sees him he\n      is carrying a camera. For a long time, Subject thought he was\n      a tourist.\n\n   g. KARCHIN (P-11,829) - One of the guards at the gate and\n      due to return to Moscow soon.\n\n   h. SOLOMATIN (P-7452) - Another guard at the gate.\n\n   i. KORUSHKIN (P-11,707) - Subject sees him often. He is\n      a driver.\n\n   j. LOGINOV (P-11,712) - He is a tennis player. He wanted\n      Subject to teach his children English. LOGINOV's son is\n      presently studying with the Embassy's female English teacher.\n      LIROCKET-1 says he is a nice guy.\nContact Report\nSubject: LIBACON-1 (F-4805)\nDate of Meet: May 21 at the Paris-Mexico Restaurant\n\n1. This meet was held in lieu of the one scheduled for May 14 which L-1 postponed by phone. L-1 was at the pick up place 10 minutes before the scheduled time but I was there still earlier and I observed nothing suspicious in terms of stakeouts or surveillance. The meet lasted 75 min. NEXT MEET: Wednesday May 28 at the same pick up place.\n\n2. As we met L-1 stated that he cancelled the last week meet because he was seized by one of his nervous crisis of hysteria followed by depression (sic). He immediately added that he prepared for me nothing because in his condition he was not able to do any work.\n\n3. In the restaurant he kept on describing what effect the nervous crisis has on him and he added that he still felt depressed. During his description he did not indulge in dramatizing the matter.\n\n4. I asked him what happened to the lunch he was supposed to have with LOGINOV and he repeated what he told me by phone on May 8 and added that LOGINOV was to call him but did not do it. He added that if LOGINOV had called during the past 8 days the phone would be answered only if his wife was home. I told him that this fact was a reason for him to ring up LOGINOV, because, as we discussed and agreed on the last meet, it would serve no good purpose to L-1 if LOGINOV would characterize him as a not desirable person from the Sov point of view. He commented that he believed LOGINOV was a friend of his to the extent that he would not do such a thing to him. I countered by stating that he insisted in considering LOGINOV to be his friend, but what ever LOGINOV asked from him he turned him down with a NO; to preserve good will of a person it is necessary to meet some of his requests and the best is to do it when it does no harm to anybody and at the same time does not set L-1 involved in any of LOGINOV's schemes. He agreed with my reasoning, as he did at the last meet, but it is to be seen what will he do about it.\n\n5. To change the subject I asked L-1 to return. He said\nhe knew nothing about VENDEL, except, that his wife gave birth to a child during his absence and he added that if VENDEL had returned he would have heard about it.\n\n6. Speaking about Larel he recalled the fact that Carol HIRSH, an Ecuadorian girl of 22 approx. returned to Mexico and she will be taking an intensive course of Russian from L-1. He stated that he spoke to KARTASHEV about this girl; she was here and worked with the Olympic committee as an interpreter; after the Olympics she went to Ecuador and now she returned here; she came with her mother who found her an apartment in Rio Elba where they had a warming up party on Friday May 9; her father is a well to do physician in Quito, Ecuador; she has no permit to work in Mexico which means that her father will pay the expenses of her stay here; in view of his nervous crisis he did not keep in touch with her, but he believes that her mother had returned to Quito by now; LOGINOV knows her from some of the parties L-1 and his friends were giving during the Olympics or briefly after them.\n\n7. He forgot to tell me that he was with Andrea CANTANO (P-13,546) after she returned from her trip to the US and Canada and she told him that she definitely broke with CHERNISH (P-13,042) by telling him that she had a boy friend about whom she is serious and who is a jealous type; he (O) is welcome to come to her (parents) home when he wishes, but she is in no position to meet with him out.\n\n8. I asked L-1 was it possible that LOGINOV, who according to him was driving hard to attain achieve some success before he leaves, might have attempted to recruit Juan Luis ALVARES, director of the language school on Tiber, during the past 2 months. L-1 stated that he doubted that JLA would even want to see LOGINOV because LCG in many instances ignored JLA's requests through L-1 to pass by the school. L-1 went on to say that if by incident LCG got hold of JLA and made an attempt to enlist his services, L-1 was positive that JLA would have turned him down. (NOTE: This leaves unsolved what was L-1 speaking about when he spoke about the good time LOGINOV and JLA had together at unknown date).\n\n9. I tried to explain to L-1 that he should do some writing for us along the lines of what our previous agreement. He promised.\n10. As much as L-1 is a compulsory talker, during this meet he was rather on the quiet side, i.e., he spoke when he was asked something. He had only 2 drinks and he took some food with them. He was interested in leaving on time which was pleasant news to me.\n\n11. On the way to his car I asked L-1 what he thought about the death of 16 Sov Generals in 25 weeks. He commented to the effect that a publicized purge of big wheels is intended to silence the opposition and this may be necessary in view of the fact that a number of soldiers will start returning from Czechoslovakia and their stories would be the opposite of what the government used as excuse for invading Czechoslovakia.\nTurnover Report\nSubject: LIOVAL-1\nDate of Meet: May 13\n\n1. On May 13 at 1930 hrs COIGNE met with FERNALD and briefed him on LIOVAL-1's past and present operational activity as well as gave an outline for future handling of LIOVAL-1. At 2030 hrs C and F met with LIOVAL-1 at NOYO 19 restaurant where in the course of a farewell dinner the turnover was effected.\n\n   Next F - L-1 meet: May 21 at 1330 hrs at the same restaurant.\n\n2. Comment:\n   a. During the next two month F and L-1 will hold personal meets twice a month.\n   b. L-1 can be reached during working days on phone 23-99-34 from 0800-1410 hrs at his school; on phone 75-10-03 at home except Wednesdays when he will be home from 1600-1700 hrs.\n   c. L-1 can use the extension 670 to leave a message for F (whom he knows under the alias of Victor Brandon). L-1 will usually stated that he wants to see F on a given day and time, which means that he will be waiting for F at a restaurant which will be selected as their meet site on their next meet.\n\n3. Security:\n   a. Standard security practices will be applied to F - L-1 personal meets and other operational activity.\n   b. On their next meet a new meet site will be selected.\n   c. For internal use only: C instructed F that with regard to what can be said to L-1 there was no use of getting into the security for the sake of security; if it would serve any useful purpose of telling L-1 that\nwe recruited LIBACON-1, then he should be told about it.\n\n4. Admin & Finance:\n   a. L-1 considers it probable that he owes LIBACON-1 payment for several lessons. He will ascertain the amount and P will pay it on the next meet.\n   b. C informed L-1 about the status of the order of a Polboat and was told that when it comes P will deliver it to him.\n   c. With regard to ops expenses former agreement remains in power.\n\n5. Operational:\n   a. L-1 reported on LIBACON-1's statements to him about LOGINOY on May 2 (reported separately). This provided a taylor made opening for operational directives.\n   b. L-1 will continue his contact with LIBACON-1 through language classes, because LIBACON-1 is still a person of interest to us.\n   c. We received from other sources info that LOGINOY would leave POS in July. In view of the fact that Sov IS officers are judged home by the mecanical computation of their activity abroad, our experience shows that a good number of them try to embellish their record in the last 2-3 months before their departure by establishing contacts and making recruitment attempts with disregard for security rules and sound operation-practices. We have sufficient indications that LOGINOY falls in this category of Sov IS officers without trying to determine whether LIBACON-1's statements to L-1 may be an additional indication to that effect. As far as we know LOGINOY it would be in line with his recent behavior if he approached L-1.\n   d. If L-1 is approached by LOGINOY or another Sov official he will act friendly and speak about his friendship with Pavel YATSKOV. L-1 will make a remark to the effect that PI failed to keep his promise and send him\nhis Moscow address.\n\ne. If LOGINOV, or whoever it may be, disclaims knowledge about L-1 - YATSKOV friendly relation, L-1 will speak in terms that this fact ought to be a common knowledge in the Sov Embassy.\n\nf. If the person making the approach accuses L-1 for trying to buy a Sov official (PY), L-1 pretend that the approacher is grossly mistaken and will open a barrage of questions to determine what was known here about the PY case. If the correct sum involved in that case is mentioned, or place the pitch was made or other detail(s) indicating that the approacher is cognizant of this specific case, L-1 will politely ask what the approacher wanted from him and will not hesitate to tell him that the same offer applies to the approacher.\n\ng. If LOGINOV makes the approach under the pretext of wishing to maintain friendly relation with L-1 and admits knowing PY and having heard about PY's friendship with L-1 he will be treated friendly and L-1 will invite him to a dinner and let him talk. In such a case it would be obvious that LOGINOV would want to pass L-1 to somebody else.\n\nh. When, whoever it be, would attempt to recruit L-1 he will stick to his guns of being an American patriot and will turn him down by stating that he was able to make a better offer to the recruiter.\n\nEHFernald\nATTACHMENT to TURNOVER Report\nMay 15, 1969.\n\nSubject: Rafael VIDIELLA R\u00edos (P-4805)\nValent\u00edn LOGINOV (P-11,712)\n\nSource: LIOVAL-1 (P-)\n\n1. On May 2 Rafael gave a language lesson to LIOVAL-1 and on that occasion he stated that LOGINOV had taken Juan Luis, Director of the language school on Tiber, for a day of having fun. It was not clear whether Juan Luis and LOGINOV had a night on the town or they went out of town for a whole day \"to have some fun\".\n\n2. Rafael told L-1 that he did not understand such an attitude of LOGINOV, because he considered LOGINOV to be a good friend of his; he was surprised that LOGINOV did not invite him together with Juan Luis, in fact, he could not explain to himself how something like that could happen.\n\n3. Rafael went speaking about LOGINOV for some time about how good he is basically as a man; how pleasant companion he is and what a good friend he is.\n\n4. L-1 pointed out that there was nothing factual nor significant in what he said about LOGINOV, but L-1 was puzzled by the fact that \"out of the blue sky\" Rafael was speaking about LOGINOV and kept on speaking and speaking.\n\n5. L-1 believed that Rafael's pride was hurt immensely by the fact that LOGINOV ignored him, especially, when there was a chance of having some fun. Therefore, L-1 told Rafael that it was possible that LOGINOV wanted to invite him too, but was not able to reach him by phone, which would not be unusual in view of the fact that Rafael is practically never home.\n\n6. On this same occasion Rafael asked LIOVAL-1 if he would be kind to pay him the lessons which he owed him. In view of the irregularity of Rafael's appearances to give lessons L-1 was not certain whether he owed anything or not. Rafael corroborated his request by stating that\nhis wife writes down every payment Rafael receives and the book shows that no payment was received since Jan or Feb 27 (IIP does not remember which month was mentioned). L-1 stated that if it so, then, Rafael must be right. Because he was short of cash he paid him M$ 150. - and stated that he would pay the remainder the next time, i.e. the next lesson, which was scheduled for Wed May 7 at 1700 hrs. (NOTE: Rafael had a meet with MIP on the same day at 1620 hrs, and it was him to pick up this day and time. Rafael came to this meet on time).\n\n7. The fact that Rafael did not show up for the lesson was no surprise to L-1. Nevertheless, about 1830 Rafael's wife phoned to L-1 and asked to speak to her husband. When L-1 stated that he was not there she commented that he was supposed to be there at 1800 hrs. About an hour later she called again and L-1 had to state that he did not come at all. Then, she requested L-1 to give to Rafael the sweater of her daughter which was accidently left at L-1's place. Of course nothing happened, but since that moment L-1 did not hear from Rafael nor his wife. L-1 pointed out that this was unusual, because if Rafael skips a lesson he calls the next day and never later than the third day to apologize. Further, the sweater which Rafael was to pick up from L-1, according to the wife's statement, was a part of their daughter's kindergarten uniform. L-1 concluded that he was inclined to believe that Rafael got angry with him or because he questioned the correctness of the claim for payment or because he placed him on a spot by telling his wife that he did not show up at L-1's place.\n\n8. L-1 was told not to take the matter so seriously since there was still a chance that Rafael and his wife were on a war path and they had no time for anything else. L-1 was requested to try to contact Rafael or his wife as soon as possible. L-1 considered that May 15 (Teachers Day) would be the best time to do it and there was no objection on his choice of date since it offered a better chance of finding Rafael home.\n\n9. L-1 was also requested to bring to Rafael's attention that the irregularity of lessons inconveniences him quite bit on one hand and on the other Rafael loses the money........\n\n10. Comment by MIP: The fact that L-1 pointed out that Rafael talking about LOGNOV does not mean that anything happened recently, still calls\n12 May 1969\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Nathan L. Ferris\nLegal Attach\u00e9\n\nFROM: Winston M. Scott\n\nSUBJECT: CHEN (fnu)\nCTC #7115\nWANG (fnu)\nCTC #3763\n(105-6578)\n\n1. Reference is made to your memoranda dated 18 January 1968 and 25 April 1969. Reference is also made to our memorandum dated 29 January 1968, #12,823.\n\n2. In order to assist you in the investigation being carried out by your Headquarters, attached herewith for your retention are two copies each of those handwriting specimens available on persons assigned to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City in December 1967. There are no fingerprint specimens available. Listed below are the names of those Soviets whose handwriting specimens are being forwarded herewith.\n\n   a. Nikolay Ivanovich KUZNETSOV, Employee (MI Representative), Soviet Commercial Office. Possibly KGB.\n\n   b. Nikolay Sergeyevich LECNOV, was Second Secretary, Press Attach\u00e9 at the Soviet Embassy. Known KGB. Departed PCS December 1968.\n\n   c. Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, Third Secretary, Consul, Soviet Embassy. Known KGB.\n\n   d. Vasily Stepanovich NIKOSHENIKOV, was Employee (Chauffeur), Soviet Embassy. Known KGB. Departed PCS September 1968.\n\n   e. Boris Nikolayevich VOSKODOY/IKOV, Second Secretary, Cultural Attach\u00e9, Soviet Embassy. Probably KGB.\n\n   f. Pavel Antonovich YATSEKOV, was Second Secretary, Soviet Embassy. Known KGB. Departed PCS 6 December 1967.\n\n3. There is no other information available locally on Subject case.\n\nAttachment: b/w\n\nSECRET #13,778\nSECRET\n\nTHIS INFORMATION IS FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE. IT MUST NOT BE DISSEMINATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART OUTSIDE YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATING OFFICE IN MEXICO CITY.\n\nGrace H. FARMILANT:mes\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 1 - Addresssee w/att h/w\n1 - 50-5-8 w/o att\n1 - P-1112 w/att already in file\n1 - P-992 w/att already in file\n1 - P-11,712 w/att already in file\n1 - P-8518 w/att already in file\n1 - P-2280 w/att already in file\n1 - 885 w/att already in file\n1 - 50-2-4/1 w/o att\n1 - Memo chrono w/o att\n2 - Headquarters pouch (return to FARMILANT)\nLIBACON-1\nBriefs on Keet Held May 7 from 1630 to 2035 hrs.\n\nThen came I asked till what hour he can be with me. He said 1630.\nAt 1615 I paid the bill, but he insisted that we stay a little longer\nand for the rest he would pay the bill; he had 2 additional drinks\nwhile I had my third coffee and a drink.\n\nAs we got together he told me that he was on May 3 with his\nwife at Cuautla and as he was entering the pool area LOGIN7 was leaving.\nLOG cornered him for a 15 minutes talk which consisted of persuading\nLIBACON into making some arrangements that LOG would be able to meet\nLOGIN7. When LIBACON turned him down LOG insisted that they have a lunch\non Thur. May 8 at the restaurant El Perro Andaluz (or similar) at\nthe Copenhagen about 1230 hrs. LIBACON accepted.\n\nLIBACON brought me a bio sketch on LOGIN7, which was an\ninteresting paper. We discussed the paper which enabled me to obtain\nexplanations and facts on which LIBACON based his general statements.\n\nLIBACON readily gave me info on Prof. E. LIBAN. There was\nnot much, but sufficient to ascertain that he did not attempt to\nwithhold info from us. (This was best - much better detail needed)\n\nHe also gave me some info on KAPEL WENDL who is presently\nconducting a tour of Mexicans through Europe and was in Prague with the\ngroup a day before Dubcek was kicked out...\n\nHe teachers of Spanish at the Sov Emb other than his mother\nLIBACON did not know anything but promised to ask his mother on Sat\nwhen she will be at his home.\n\nIt took me some time to explain to LIBACON what attitude to\ntake toward LOG during the lunch.\n\nDetailed report will be prepared. Now\nhanding in notes on my instruction to LIBACON concerning how to\nhandle the lunch with LOG. Also handed in is the bio sketch on LOG.\nATTACHMENT\nMay 8, 1969\n\nValentin LOGINOV (7-11,712)\n\nSource: LIRACON-1 (P-4805)\n\n1. On May 3 Source went with his family to Cuautla to spend a day out of town. There, as he arrived he bumped into LOGINOV who was leaving. They talked 15 minutes.\n\n2. LOGINOV asked Source was he still giving language lessons to that American (LIOVAL-1). As Source answered affirmatively LOG told Source that he would like to meet LIOVAL-1. SOURCE stated that LIOVAL was not only a student who pays his lessons but was also a good friend of Source. Then LOGINOV became quite blunt and aggressive; he outright demanded that LIRACON introduce him to LIOVAL. LIRACON tried to reason out with LOGINOV that by meeting LIOVAL he would achieve nothing because LIOVAL was a good family man, a person conscious of his responsibility for 4 children, liberal in his way of thinking but definitely a patriot and a person who is attached to his way of life and could not care less about Socialism. LOGINOV then insisted that he and LIRACON have a lunch together \"next\" week to talk this matter over. LIRACON agreed to lunch with him on May 8, i.e., a day after he meets with me.\n\n3. LIRACON told me that he would stick to his guns and refuse LOGINOV's request to introduce him to LIOVAL. One of special reasons for doing so, in addition to his desire of not getting involved with that gang (KGB), was that he considered LIOVAL to be a friend of his and would not want to do anything which could make LIOVAL suspect that LIRACON was a KGB collaborator.\n\n4. Other than the fact that LIOVAL exists I know nothing about him, but the sole fact that he is an agent of our forced me to assume that he was picked up for a good reason and that we must have an objective for holding him. Therefore, I felt that it would not be wise to let LIRACON shut the door to a possibility (how much remote it may be) that we counted on the possibility that LIOVAL be approached or contacted by a Sov official. Further, I kept in mind that we would not want LIRACON to slip into a double agent role. Therefore, I instructed LIRACON:\na. He wishes to be on friendly terms with LOGINOV, but certainly it is not a friendly attitude if LOGINOV asks him something impossible. (Try to get LOG to do explaining).\n\nd. Repeat description of LIOVAL's personality as he did in Cuautla and ask what can LOGINOV possibly achieve by meeting LIOVAL. It is anticipated that LOGINOV may be brief and say that this would be his problem and that all EXILED LIBACON had to do is to arrange for an introduction.\n\nc. LIBACON will insist that he does not want to get involved \"in that kind of business\", especially, because it was clear to him that even if LOGINOV achieves nothing, he lost nothing, but LIBACON is a sure loser because he would lose a friend and possibly get tagged as a Sov spy.\n\nd. If LOGINOV does not break off his insisting at this point, LIBACON will state that he would agree on a plan, if LOGINOV had one, by which LIOVAL would be in LIBACON's company, but no introduction of LOGINOV as a friend of LIBACON would be made. We played it back and forth discussing various possibilities, but important was that LOGINOV should come up with a plan and that LIOVAL be given a possibility of saying to LIBACON that he did not want to come.\n\ne. After the lunch LIBACON will go to his institute and I would phone him there to find out at which point the conv with LOGINOV ended.\nATTACHMENT\nMay 8, 1969.\n\n(P-11,712)\n\nSubject: Postponement of Valentin LOGINOV - LIRACON-1 Lunch.\n\nSource: LIRACON-1 (P-4605)\n\n1. In accordance with the prearrangements I phoned to LIRACON-1 to the language institute at 1455 hrs to hear how did the scheduled lunch go.\n\n2. LIRACON-1 stated that a pm student of his postponed his lesson for a half of an hour and that he phoned to LOGINOV to come to the restaurant they were to lunch about 45 minutes later than they had agreed to meet there. LOGINOV told LIRACON that in that case he preferred to postpone the lunch to the beginning of the next week and that LOGINOV would phone to LIRACON-1 to set the date and time.\n\n3. According to LIRACON-1, LOGINOV sounded friendly on the phone.\n\nRHF\nValentin LGINOV\n\nEdad aproximada de 43-45 a\u00f1os, aunque aparenta menos. F\u00edsicamente de compleci\u00f3n atl\u00e9tica, alto. Juega muy bien al tenis. Recientemente qued\u00f3 en segundo lugar en el campeonato del D.F. que tuvo lugar en el Club Francia, donde practica este deporte. Cuida much\u00edsimo su condici\u00f3n f\u00edsica y m\u00e1s que nada su apariencia. En este sentido es muy vanidoso. Muy pocos amigos saben que tiene una hija de 16-17 a\u00f1os. Cuando le preguntan si tiene hijos habla solo de su hijo de 11 a\u00f1os de edad. Le da pena presentar a su mujer, que es muy amable y buena, porque se ve de m\u00e1s edad que \u00e9l. No fuma, toma muy poco, aunque cuando la ocasi\u00f3n requiere de tomar mucho aguardiente y siempre se le ve sereno. Es muy amable en el trato. Nunca trata de imponer sus ideas, pero siempre pendiente de convencer por las buenas a sus contrincantes. Cuando ve que no puede hacer lo \u00faltimo, rompe diplom\u00e1ticamente los relaciones amistosas con el sujeto.\n\nEn sus ideas es de la escuela estalinista: solo cuenta lo Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica y la \u00faltima l\u00ednea a seguir del Partido. Eso quiere decir que no tiene ideas propias. Sigue fidel\u00edsimamente la \"l\u00ednea\" porque sabe muy bien que es la \u00fanica forma r\u00e1pida y eficaz de escalar en su carrera. Le gusta much\u00edsimo la vida buena, tipo occidental, aunque antes se dejar\u00eda cortar un brazo que confesar\u00edase as\u00ed mismo. Es muy ambicioso y se ve que tiene problemas con sus compa\u00f1eros de trabajo. Habla despectivamente de ellos. No le gusta nada la idea de tener que permanecer en Mosc\u00fa los dos a\u00f1os que vienen. Le dijo que har\u00eda lo posible que al transcurrir esos a\u00f1os lo mandaran de preferencia otra vez a M\u00e9xico. Su ilusi\u00f3n m\u00e1s grande es trabajar en Espa\u00f1a. Adora a los espa\u00f1oles. La forma de ser de los mexicanos no le gusta. Por eso si quiere regresar, quiere decir que prefiere cualquier lugar donde vivir, menos Rusia. Creo que precisamente\nporque ya tiene que partir en julio, es por lo que \u00faltimamente est\u00e1 cometiendo errores. Quiere hacer esto a como de lugar, presionando a la gente de que antes jam\u00e1s hac\u00eda. El d\u00eda 3 de mayo lo vi en Cuauht\u00e9moc, y sabiendo que yo no quiero trabajar para \u00e9l, me insisti\u00f3, llegando al consejo de preguntar si pod\u00edamos abordar a mi alumno John, sin siquiera preguntar por la personalidad y forma de pensar de John. En los 15 minutos que estuvimos juntos no habl\u00f3 m\u00e1s que de eso. Cuando yo le dije que ya le hab\u00eda dicho antes que no me gustaba esa clase de trabajo, me contest\u00f3 que \u00e9l cre\u00eda que lo que me pasaba es que ten\u00eda miedo. La forma m\u00e1s inocente de hacerme picar! A continuaci\u00f3n, me invit\u00f3 a comer el d\u00eda 8 para seguir hablando de lo mismo. En el fondo creo que todo eso revela cierta inocencia y muchas ganas de progresar, para llevar una vida muy diferente a lo que llevan los ciudadanos sovi\u00e9ticos. Creo que quiere dejar una gran impresi\u00f3n a sus jefes para no quedar trabajando indefinidamente en el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Mosc\u00fa. No s\u00e9 hasta qu\u00e9 punto sus ambiciones puedan guiarlo, a progresar incluso por medio de atropellar v\u00edctimas. Como persona y en condiciones normales me parece bueno, generoso y fiel amigo. Sin embargo la verdad es que nunca lo llegu\u00e9 a conocer muy bien, en parte posiblemente porque casi desde el principio sent\u00eda instintivamente que quer\u00eda algo de m\u00ed, muy aparte de nuestra amistad y en parte porque con todo y la confianza que lleg\u00f3 a tener conmigo jam\u00e1s se descubri\u00f3 por completo, al mucho menos. Es extremadamente cauteloso.\n\nResumiendo: Mi impresi\u00f3n es que es una buena persona, de buenos sentimientos, pero que una vez metido en \"ese trabajo,\" por razones que desconocemos, hace todo lo posible por destacar.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: RESABER (P-8777)\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 10 April 1969\n\n1. In response to RESABER's phone call, I met him at his hotel room in the Aristos from 1430 until 1545. Next meeting will be on Tuesday evening, 15 April at home.\n\n2. Subject had nothing new to report on contacts with BEDOXERS, but said that he is now raring to go on any requirements I might levy. He said that all of his financial problems are now solved (as I surmised they would). Essentially, he has sold 50% of his business (INZA) to a syndicate-group that is paying off Subject's debts. They will construct a big new factory complex in Cuernavaca to bring all of Subject's manufacturing enterprises under one roof and double capacity. They're also going to open up offices and a showroom on Insurgentes Sur. Subject figures he will probably stay active for a couple of years more and then sell his remaining 50% for about a half million dollars.\n\n3. I told Subject again that I am now anxious for him to establish a social relationship with SPYRA (P-6601) and that I am no longer interested in his developing MAJCHCHRZAK per se. I suggested that he might use MAJ simply as an entree to meeting SPYRA, ostensibly to work out a cultural program of Subject's grandfather's music as mentioned previously. Subject said that he would get on it right away and would try to call the Ambassador on Tuesday when Subject is back in town.\n4. I also asked Subject to get back in touch with Boris CHEYKOV (P-6235) and Valentin LOGINOV (P-11,712) to warm up the relationship. I pointed out that we should be prepared to have Subject in a position to give them gifts in the event Headquarters approves the plan to bug some of Subject's Trojan horses. Unless there is some reasonably good contact established in advance, his presenting gifts will appear too contrived. Subject agreed and said that he would give them a phone call soon to try to get together for drinks. Judging from past history, CHEYKOV will be ready to see Subject for a night on the town in August.\n\n5. I paid Subject $3000 (NN) constituting half of his retainer for three months (Jan., Feb. and March) and agreed to have the balance of $3000 for him on Tuesday. He gave me a pile of hotel bills and other expenses which will be charged against the $3000 revolving fund he has outstanding. He asked me if I could get him a case of champagne, a couple of bottles of cognac, a bottle of gin. I told him that I'd see if these are available and that, if they are, I would charge them against either his salary or fund rather than as outright gifts as in the past.\n\nTimothy M. ARCHEBOLD\nVal apparently waiting for me to make first move. I saw that Val was not playing, but looking for a partner while talking to Meche Pinto and another girl. He was two courts away from me. I finished playing with my opponent. I couldn't see walking over to Val and invite him to play. He knew I was finished. He also owed me an apology for the cancelled luncheon date.\n\nI shouted loudly to a ball-boy to find my favorite trainer. Val dashed over to say he would like to play.\n\nExcuse for missed lunch. I \"what happened to our luncheon date\", I asked with no smile. Val said that Dimi had been bitten badly by a dog. I told Val that I had already heard that story and that Dimi had been bitten nearly a week before our date. Once again I did not smile and gave him little opportunity for a gracious acceptance of a poor excuse. It was clear that I was annoyed. I could see from Val's expression that he was embarrassed and off-balance. He has a peculiar facial expression when he has been put at a disadvantage.\n\nVal admitted that the bite had been much earlier, but he explained that the wound had become inflamed and he had to take Dimi to a doctor. I saw Dimi and he had one of the smaller Band-aids on his arm. He seemed to be having no discomfort.\n\nI accepted Val's excuse tacitly.\n\nWe played. Unfortunately Val won 6-3, 6-1. I remind you that I switched to my left arm some time ago and am still at a disadvantage. I still apologize for letting the barbarian win. I had to leave at 1145. Immediately three other men invited Val to make a fourth for doubles. I had hoped to talk to him when we finished.\n\nConversation, I finally had to interrupt Val while the men were still warming up and take him to a corner of the court.\n\nI told Val that I had hoped to tell him something at the lunch and on several other occasions but was always interrupted. Now I wanted to tell him what I had in mind. I wanted him to understand that his political jokes had embarrassed me. That I did not want to create a scene and had never commented on them, but I would not tolerate them in the future.\nI said that his offer to give me money to work for his government had embarrassed me in front of our mutual friends. Further, my polite refusal to make an issue of his approach could have been interpreted as tacit acceptance of his offer to pay me for treason against my country.\n\nVal interrupted and said it was all a joke and that he thought I appreciated that it was nothing more than a joke.\n\nI said I knew it was a joke, but could not speak for our audience. My position as a businessman here could be jeopardized if someone thought we were serious.\n\nI told Val that in any case, joking or not, I do not discuss politics or religion with my friends, particularly here in Mexico.\n\nHe acted very surprised and amused.\n\nI pointed out that I consider myself a guest in a very hospitable but foreign country. \"These people are my hosts. You are a diplomat. You can, you must discuss politics. It is your job. I cannot. I actually am not interested in politics. I am not well versed in politics. But if you must talk politics with me, let us go some where in private, without an audience. If you want to discuss business, fine! I know that subject and I like it, and I am even better with an audience, particularly Mexican!\"\n\nVal had his transparently disturbed, distressed and disadvantaged look. He promised never to discuss politics with me again. He apologized. He said he understood what I meant.\n\nF--- him!\nSUBJECT: Gloria Pinto\nDATE OF INFORMATION: 26 March 1969, 1300-1355 hours.\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Office of John Francis\nREPORT BY: John Francis\n\nTelephone call to my office. Gloria called to say she was having some trouble finding clients for my business. She asked when she could see me. I suggested immediately and she arrived about one hour later.\n\nPersonal chat prior to business. Gloria followed good Mexican custom in chatting lightly before getting to the matter about which the meeting was called.\n\nMeche and San Luis Potosi. I asked Gloria if she were going to San Luis Potosi this year for the Holy Week tennis tournaments. She said that she had planned to do so but was unable to find someone to go with her at the last moment. Pepe did not want to go, and would not let her go by herself unless accompanied by several other women or by Meche. Meche refused to go saying she would have no fun if with her mother and planned to go to Corpus Christi by herself.\n\nPepe to Europe again. Gloria volunteered that she was annoyed with Pepe. She deplores his Latin attitude about the double standard. She has been prohibited to take several brief trips to various cities in Mexico to see friends and family. She is not welcome to accompany Pepe on his trips. Yet he will soon take another month off to travel either to Europe or to South America. Gloria said that she has been waiting all these years for her children to grow up so that she could go with Pepe on his trips. Now that they are grown up, she finds that she still is expected to stay home.\n\nGloria watched carefully. Gloria must account for her time very carefully to Pepe during the day. And under no circumstances can she stay out after dark. Pepe apparently disapproves of Gloria working for me. He does not like the idea that she will be visiting businessmen throughout the city both in their offices and homes. He has expressed his disapproval, but Gloria has chosen to ignore it.\n\nWant to send Meche to U.S. Gloria wants to fight the attitude of superiority over women that Latin men have, but on behalf of her daughter, not herself. Gloria feels that she will never be able to enjoy anything close to equal treatment and consideration with Pepe. But she feels that her daughter should escape from this Latin degradation. Two or three years working in New York or San Francisco is Gloria's dream for Meche.\nNo luck with business. Gloria seems very enthusiastic about working for me. Not so much to help me, but to give herself an excuse to get out and do something. Further, she wants to determine whether she can actually do something other than raise children. She was married when very young and has never worked. She hopes eventually to start some business of her own. She probably wants to have a shape of some kind. Working for me is a trial for herself. She hopes to prove to herself that she can succeed in business and meeting people.\n\nThe approach she has been taking with my business has been unsuccessful so far. I have given her the one which is most time-consuming and one which I would not have been able to do by myself. There are other approaches, but I have not outlined these to her as yet.\n\nWe discussed her approach and some modifications of it. We agreed to review her sales approach after the Holy Week and decide whether to proceed along different lines.\n\nDiscussion of Val. Having completed our business I raised the matter of Val. I reminded her that I had explained to her some time ago that I was annoyed with Val's treatment of me in public, namely his flagrant attempts to recruit me in the presence of mutual friends. I told her that I still hadn't had a chance to talk to Val in private. I repeated that all I wanted to do was make it clear to him that I hold him in great esteem as a person, valued his friendship, was not interested in assisting his government, and wanted him to stop jeopardizing our friendship with his offensive approaches, whether subtle and implied or direct and coarse.\n\nI told Gloria that I had planned to have lunch with Val today. I enjoy Val's company; rarely have a chance to chat quietly; don't like to eat lunch by myself; and looked forward to explaining to Val my position before he completely destroyed any chance for us to continue as friends.\n\nNot aware of accident to Dmitri. I told Gloria that Val had excused himself from our lunch date due to an accident to his son. She did not know of any accident other than the dog bite the previous week.\n\nGloria said that his declining my invitation might have been an afterthought. That he did not want to hurt my by being seen with me in a public place.\nAvoids \"hurting\" his friends. Gloria then told me that Val never accepted an invitation to have coffee with her or Pepe or to dine out. He explained to her that it could hurt her to be seen with him. She gave an example of when she was invited to the ballet with Val and a group of friends.\n\nAfter the ballet, Pepe and Gloria invited Val to join them for dinner. Val declined. Pepe and Gloria went to the Hoyo 19. Shortly after they arrived, Val and a large number of embassy officers also arrived. Val steered them away from Pepe and Gloria. Shortly afterwards a man arrived, sat at a remote table and took notes while watching the Soviets.\n\nVal works mornings only. Gloria mentioned that Val is in the embassy only in the morning. This was in response to my statement that I had tried to call the embassy and talk to Val to find out what had happened to Dmitri, but since he was out, I would call in the afternoon. She added that he of course works in the afternoon, but outside the embassy. I said \"trying to buy gringos\". She said \"trying to convince Mexicans\".\n\nCOMMENTS\n\nIt seems to me highly unlikely that Val is really concerned about the welfare of his friends seen with him. It seems quite clear that he considers Gloria and Pepe, and perhaps me, as potential assets. He does not want to be seen with us because we would lose our value to him. He told Gloria that they should confine their contacts to the French Club. This seems to confirm the suspicion that he believes that this is a secure place to meet people.\n\nIt is possible that he checked with his colleagues and they were of the opinion that my choice of the Llave de Oro for lunch was too public, exposed us to too many Americans.\n\nI feel that Gloria has served a very useful purpose in this matter. If she is working for Val, which I doubt, she is in a position to see that my business is indeed legitimate, time-consuming, and with considerable financial potential. Further, she is in a position to relay to Val my unwillingness to cooperate with him and his government and my threat to take the matter to the embassy if his harassment continues.\n26 March 1969\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nFROM: Samuel J. KARTASUK\n\nSUBJECT: Rafael VIDILLAS Ruiz\n\n1. A meeting was held from 1300 to 1445, 25 March 1969 in the Chalupas Restaurant located on Reforma, one block east of Prado Norte. Next meeting is scheduled for 1630, 26 March 1969 at VIPS Restaurant on the Periferico, North of Ejercito Nacional.\n\n2. I parked my car three blocks from the meeting site and arrived in the area at 1255. Subject was already seated at a table waiting. We had lunch and remained there talking until 1445. He mentioned how much he appreciated the two books (in Russian) which I loaned him and said that he was nearly through with the last one. He said he would turn them over to VICTOR. (I had already informed him that he would be meeting a man named VICTOR during my absence). He asked if we could obtain for him the three other books written by the same author who wrote \"Cancer Ward\". He said \"Cancer Ward\" was the second book written by the author. The 1st book was \"First Circle\", the 2nd was Cancer Ward, the 3rd was \"______ Ivanov\", and the last was \"Easter ______\". He commented on how favorably impressed he was by the 2nd book. I said I would give VICTOR this information and I thought we could probably turn up with some of them.\n\n2. INFORMATION CONCERNING LOGINOV (P-11, 712):\n\nSubject said that he has not (definitely) talked to LOGINOV in over two months. He thought it very strange that LOGINOV has not called him at all. At the last meeting with LOGINOV, LOGINOV told Subject that he was going back to Russia in July 1969, and that he would remain there for at least two (2) years. LOGINOV said that he would probably then go to some other country but had no idea where. Subject did not call LOGINOV and invite him to VIPS party on 1 March.\nSubject said that if LOGIKOV received an invitation to ANDREA's party, that it might have come from CHRYSTSH (P-13.042). During his conversations with ANDREA, she never mentioned the fact that LOGIKOV went to the party. She never told Subject exactly who went.\n\n3. Concerning ANDREA CATANO:\n\nAbout ten days ago ANDREA went to Commercial Mexicana to do the weekly grocery shopping. Subject dropped by her house while she was gone. Shortly after arriving at her house, she called home and he talked to her on the phone. She said that she had some problems at the store and asked if he could come down and bring some money. He went with her brother, and on arriving at the store found her in custody of two managers and a Policeman. They had caught her trying to walk out with a stolen jar of face cream (she admitted it) and she did not have the money to pay for it. Subject talked to the managers, telling them that she was just a young girl, etc., and convinced them to do nothing about it. Rafael paid for the face cream and they took her home. (Rafael thinks this is a very unusual side of her character that he has never seen before).\n\nANDREA has not mentioned CHRYSTSH to Subject since my last report.\n\nRafael said that he will begin to pump ANDREA for some further information (in a discreet way). As far as he knows, she has not seen CHRYSTSH lately. (Perhaps since the party on 1 March).\n\n4. Concerning Rafael's MOTHER AND HER WORK AT THE EMBASSY:\n\n(I asked Subject several questions about his mother, but he dodged them. He seemed unwilling to discuss her, and after several tries I stopped pushing). Rafael said that his Mother has one particular student in Spanish (at the Embassy) who has repeatedly expressed the desire to meet and become friends with Rafael. His Mother likes the man (her student) and said that she will shortly invite him home for dinner so that he and Rafael can become acquainted. (Rafael by now is suspicious of any Embassy official who wants to become friends). The man is\nV. LOGUNOV\n\nAlto, de figura atl\u00e9tica, muy bien parecido. Un tipo f\u00edsico muy ruso.\n\nExpresi\u00f3n de cara muy seria, pero bondadosa. Est\u00e1 solo o en compa\u00f1\u00eda, siempre est\u00e1 pendiente de su compostura. Se nota que le preocupa much\u00edsimo la impresi\u00f3n que pueda causar en los de m\u00e1s. En la conversaci\u00f3n cuida mucho sus palabras, tratando de parecer ingenio y sobre todo muy sencillo. Caricaturing de inteligencia sobresaliente, trata de explotar su supuesta sencillez e ingenuidad para convencer a los dem\u00e1s de lo que dice, piensa o siente.\n\nJam\u00e1s se pone violento en una discusi\u00f3n, si no puede contestar como es debido los argumentos inteligentes de su interlocutor pone una cara ingenuamente triste o alegremente sencilla. As\u00ed jam\u00e1s pierde un amigo por muy diferentes opiniones o ideolog\u00eda que \u00e9ste tenga.\nLUNCH: Script for meeting with Valentin\nDATE OF MEETING: March 24, 1969\n\nDear for meeting, I find it very difficult to talk on the tennis court. Last Saturday was no exception. We are either playing tennis or sunbathing by a group of our friends. There is something I've wanted to say to you, to make clear, for several weeks, and the only way I could be sure of having your undivided attention, in private, was this lunch.\n\nDr. Gomez! luncheon, your offer of money. Several weeks ago, at Luis Gomez' house, you offered to give me a large sum of money if I could help you and your embassy. You made this offer in front of a number of our mutual friends.\n\nI realize that your offer was not entirely serious\u2014but not entirely in jest. The more I thought about your offer, the more it bothered me, the harder I got. What you did was put me in a very embarrassing position. You suggested that I commit treason against my country, and you made the offer in front of our friends. The fact that I chose not to create a scene could have been interpreted by our audience as possible interest in your offer.\n\nNot interested in your offer. In the event that you have any doubts, let me make it clear that I am not interested in your offer. I find the offer offensive and provocative.\n\nAffection for Val. Both my wife and I like you and Alexandra. And my boys like Dmitri. We would like to maintain your friendship with you. But you are seriously jeopardizing that friendship.\n\nUninterested in politics. I am not interested in politics. I realize that this is your business. Well, that's your problem, not mine. I am a business man and devote all my time to business. Even so, I don't have time to learn all there is and all I need to know about doing business. Any spare time I have I will devote to learning more about business. I cannot afford the time to prepare myself for political discussions with you or anyone else.\n\nAvoid religion and politics. Even when a discussion touches upon something about which I think I know enough to comment, I will not discuss politics or religion with friends. I do not believe it is possible to discuss these topics without upsetting someone. There are too many other things about which one can talk safely, namely, weather, sports, girls, etc. Furthermore, I am a Jew in a Jewish country. I am grateful for the hospitality of this country. It is a wonderful place to live\u2014a wonderful place to work. I will be even more careful.\nnot to upset my gracious hosts.\n\nPolitical points. Just for the record, let me make a few statements which I would never make in front of our friends\u2014to avoid embarrassing you, to avoid creating a scene, to honor any resolution not to discuss politics.\n\n1. Soviet imperialism, unjustified. I believe that your country is characterized by totalitarian imperialism\u2014a system for more destructive than constructive\u2014a system which is expert in taking away and destroying what others have created, but is incapable of producing creative ideas of its own.\n\n2. UNITED STATES SYSTEM. I believe that the United States has produced the greatest political-economic system, the most (almost too) democratic system that man has ever seen.\n\n3. Soviet responsibility for Viet Nam. The USSR is our enemy in Viet Nam. You supply 90% of the arms and money needed by the North Vietnamese. It is not a question of our withdrawing or ceasing the war; it is up to you to do so. The USSR is continuing the war. You know it and I know it.\n\n4. SOVIET anti-Semitism. The Soviets, you by your own confession, are anti-Semites. Your role of support of the continued troubled state in the near east is unjustifiable and misanthropic.\n\n5. BERLIN WALL. Unjustified and embarrassing to you.\n\n6. CZECHOSLOVAKIA. Unjustified and embarrassing to you.\n\n7. HUNGARY.\n\n8. PERU.\n\n9. G-Virus mentality. You are like the student in a class who receives a near-failing grade. When questioned by his father, he answered that everyone else got D's. Your country in has been getting near-failing grades in internal economics and external policies. You hope to see everyone else fail so that you don't look so bad.\n\nThis is just a sampling of some of my opinions. I am sure that you can accept many of these beliefs. But I am sure that if I had the time I could document my opinions\u2014yet historically never can.\nI repeat, I am not interested in discussing politics with you or anyone else. I value your friendship too much to risk it that way. But there is something else at stake.\n\nRisk to American business. Your provocative statements to me in public can make it difficult for me to do business here. I think there is a great opportunity here to do business, and I want to take advantage of it. You are jeopardizing this. I have studiously avoided political involvement here. You make such involvement inevitable.\n\nThreat to go to embassy. If you continue to harass me, I will go to the US Embassy and report your harassment to the Security Officer. I will even ask to see someone in the CIA. And if I don't get satisfaction there, I'll go to the Mexican Foreign Office and tell them my story. I'll ask them to see that the harassment is stopped and that I be protected from further provocations.\n\nWould prefer not to do so. There are several reasons why I would rather not do all that.\n\n1. First. It would probably put you on the spot. This would serve no real purpose since someone else would simply take over your assignments. And I consider you a personal friend, and would not want to see you in turn harassed by the Foreign Service or denied entry to the United States. I would hope some day you might be assigned to the United States and see it first hand.\n\n2. Second. I have had very little contact with the embassy. I have very little confidence in civil servants. They usually are working for the government because they could never survive in private business. This may or may not be the case in your own embassy. The exception that proves the rule is our economic section which I have found helpful on various occasions.\n\nIf I were to report you to the embassy, I would probably be harassed by all the little functionaries far more than you have been able to do.\n\nIf the CIA knew that I had a Soviet for a friend, I am sure that they would have all sorts of ideas about what I should say to you. This is one of the reasons I have never invited you to my home\u2014and probably never will. I do not want the CIA to know of our friendship and to try to use it.\nUnwilling to help CIA. I would not be willing to cooperate with the CIA for several reasons.\n\n1. First, I don't think you people are really accomplishing anything of value. If the same amount of money that is now spent on espionage were diverted to constructive free enterprise, the standard of living of both countries would rise to levels where no one would have the time for the present suicidal foreign involvements.\n\nAs a businessman I know that if you can't measure an activity in dollar profits, it should either be revised or discontinued.\n\n2. Second, the end-result of doing business with the CIA would be to get you to defect to our side.\n\nFrom what I know of you, and of life in the United States, you would not be happy in our country.\n\nOh, if you get in trouble somehow with your own people, by all means, offer your services to the CIA, but, please, leave me out of it.\n\nBut just for money, don't come to the US. They would probably offer you a fortune for your little secrets. The government has no idea of how to place a value on things and are delighted to spend the taxpayers money\u2014fortunately I no longer pay US taxes\u2014Mexican taxes are high enough. But don't do it. You wouldn't be happy. It's a great country. We have wonderful people. They'd probably do everything possible to make you comfortable, but you would never be happy.\n\nIf a CIA man ever offers you money to defect or to give up your few secrets, tell him to STICK IT UP HIS ASS. And that's what I'm telling you to do! STICK IT UP YOUR ASS!\n\nDON'T WASTE YOUR LUCK. I realize that if you keep trying, someday you'll succeed. That nothing ventured, nothing gained. Someday you will find an American who will be willing to work for you. There is nothing you could ever give him that would make him really happy. For his sake, I don't wish you any luck.\nTelephone call. Val called me at my office. I assume the call was from a public telephone booth, since there was considerable background noise of traffic. He would not identify himself to my secretary, but said that he was a friend.\n\nInvited me to drink. Val asked if it would be convenient for me to get together this afternoon for a drink. I checked my schedule and said that today would not be a good day. Instead I suggested that he be my guest for lunch on Wednesday.\n\nLunch date. I told him to meet me Wednesday at 1400 hours at the Llave de Oro.\n\nThere was much discussion about how to find the Llave de Oro. He was not familiar with the restaurant, nor with the passage with its restaurants and shops. I had to explain that it was bordered by Liverpool, Cono, Londres and Insurgentes.\n\nCamera not the reason. I assumed that Val's call was going to be attributed to his interest in selling his camera through me. Therefore, I referred to his camera and reminded him not to forget it. He said that this was not the reason he called and that he really wasn't in a big hurry to sell it. He said he wanted to chat with me.\n\nI told him to bring the camera anyway since I had just this morning spoken to my friend who owns a camera store and was sure I could dispose of his camera for him. He did perk up then and show some interest in the camera.\nSUBJECT: Valentin Logunov\nDATE OF INFORMATION: March 22, 1969\nPLACE ACQUIRED: French Club\n\nTennis: Val had come, probably thinking that my partner and I would complete our match with Val and Rech. My partner, however, was out of town this weekend. Rech went out to create a way. Val and Gloria Pinto (the mother of Rech) were playing singles when I arrived. I had a singles tournament myself and did not join them until an hour later. We then formed a doubles group. I played with Pepe Pinto, and Val played with Gloria against us.\n\nAs is always the case, there is very little opportunity for conversation during a tennis match. Val did make a few stupid comments of apolitical nature, but entirely harmless, such as, addressed to me, haven't you any control over your friends the Russian Chinese?\n\nI did not get a chance to confront Valentin about his provocative comments and how they jeopardized our friendship.\n\nVal asked me if I had given any thought to his request the previous week. I could not believe that he was going to open the matter about his offering me money for \"secrets.\" Therefore, I was genuinely curious about what request. He reminded me that he had spoken of a movie camera he wanted to sell and which I had stated that I thought I could dispose of it for him through friends of mine, on consignment. I told him to bring me the camera and I would see what I could do.\n\nI then told Val that there was something I had wanted to talk to him about anyway, and hoped we could get together sometime soon to do so. He stated that he would not come to the club tomorrow. He offered to take me to lunch sometime during the week.\n\nThis is not exactly what I had in mind for an informal and not too pleasant statement of my position about his approach to me. But I feel it can be used and will achieve the desired effect. Unfortunately, he might spend the next few days wondering if I am about to accept his approach.\n\nDmitri bitten by dog. The main topic of conversation during the brief moments available between games or sets of tennis was Dmitri. Dmitri was bitten by the dog belonging to the Counselor of the Soviet Embassy. Apparently the bite was fairly deep in his right forearm and several large veins, hence there was much bleeding, probably an asset under the circumstances. The dog has been impounded to be watched for ten days, to determine whether Dmitri should undergo rabies shots or not. Val said that the dog had bitten four or five children already and that he, Val, would shoot the dog when the ten days are up.\n\nIt is conceivable that this is a point of friction now for Val between his Counselor and him.\nMy wife and Ruth Niegandt were present at a lunch of women tennis players. In the course of their conversation they discussed the other mixed doubles group to which they both belong, including Valentin Bogunov. My wife told Ruth that she was looking forward to having her turn of having the entire group at our home for lunch. But that we were waiting for Val to leave for Moscow. My wife said that she thought it ill-advised for an American to entertain a Soviet. Ruth agreed.\nCommission Agent. Gloria and I have been talking for some time about what she might do to keep herself busy and make a little money. I offered to discuss the matter with her months ago in either to hire her myself or find a job for her. This luncheon date was to explain to her what job I had for her.\n\nDiscussion of job. The first hour was spent discussing the job I could offer her. This would involve her following up on a list of Americans and Englishmen in the D.F. to whom I sent some promotional literature recently. These are potential clients for one of the services of my business.\n\nI gave Gloria a looseleaf notebook with copies of all my promotional literature to date, including Spanish translations of the pertinent literature. I also gave her a couple dozen envelopes with a complete set each of literature and contracts.\n\nShe is eager to start. She wants to test her ability to deal with people. Once she has built up her self-confidence she might leave me to start her own business. We agreed that this would be best for her, but in the meantime I was certain (and certain) that she would be able to find some clients for my business.\n\nConfidential. Gloria asked me if I had told anyone, including my wife, about her possibly working for me. I said that I had not. She prefers not to tell anyone until she knows if she is qualified or not.\n\nSince that time, in recent days, it appears that she has not only told her family, but has been asked about the job. Peso even scolded her, saying that married women should not work. Gloria said she was simply ignoring his Latin attitude.\n\nMention of Val. Gloria mentioned Val first in an offhand comment about his departure soon for Mexico.\n\nMy concern about Val. I told Gloria that Val had annoyed me the last time I saw him, two weeks ago. I said I didn't know whether he was serious or just kidding, but that if I thought about it, the more it bothered me. I finally decided that he might have been seriously offering me money for secrets betraying my country.\n\nI told Gloria that I seriously considered telling Val to the embassy, but said that report would not have been worth the trouble. She said that all of it was\nof the things that she described like those Val's in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde behavior. Most of the time he is a very likeable guy, and suddenly he just does something provocative.\n\nGloria was aware of intelligence activities of Val, though she spoke in euphemisms and figures of speech. Gloria did state that she is aware of Val's role as an intelligence officer. She seemed much more direct to this role than I had expected. I guess I really expected her to be naive about Val's intelligence activities. I even think I expected her to deny such activities had I been the first to mention or suggest them. Such was not the case. She referred to his activities and those of his friend Tchernych.\n\nI was particularly surprised at her sophisticated attitude about Tchernych. I personally could have doubted his intelligence activities if I hadn't personally seen him conducting a clandestine meeting on a dark street corner in San Angel late at night.\n\nI chose this opportunity to manifest a certain naivet\u00e9 on my part. I challenged her statement about Tchernych. I further stated that I doubted very much that the published reports were true that 70 percent of the Soviet embassy personnel were intelligence officers.\n\nI said that Val was not the first Soviet that I had met. I said that I used to play chess with a Soviet quite regularly and that I knew he was \"one of those\". Neither of us (Gloria and I) ever used any overt term such as \"spy\" or \"intelligence officer\", etc.\n\nGloria said that Val had offered her a lot of money to work for the Soviet embassy. She said she feels Val is miscast, that Moscow has made a very bad choice\u2014she is too human, not cold enough for that kind of work.\n\nDr. Alfonso Martinez. Dr. Martinez is a communist and a school chum of Pepe's. Gloria introduced Val and Martinez some two years ago. After this meeting they have been very close friends. He loans Val and the embassy his house in Tegucigalpa for weekend parties. His property includes a swimming pool, tennis court, dining area, picnic area, house with several bedrooms, etc. Gloria was invited to this house this Sunday, March 30th.\n\nAlexandra, better known, Gloria, said that she felt Alexandra had a better personality for their work\u2014able diplomat, colder, more mature. Val is a little boy.\n12 March 1969\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nFROM: Samuel J. KARTASUK\n\nSUBJECT: Rafael VIDILL\u00c1 RUIZ (P-505)\n\nA meeting was held from 1130 to 1430, 11 March 1969, in Chalupas Restaurant on Ave. Reforma, one block west of Reforma and Prado Norte. The date and hour of the next meeting will be established by telephone. Subject will pick up Kartasuk on Reforma, in front of the Anthropology Museum at a specified time.\n\n1. I parked my car three blocks north of the Chalupas and walked to the meeting site arriving there at 1125. Subject was waiting at a table reading one of the Russian books I had previously given him. We met, talked, and conducted our meeting over a period of three hours and then parted company.\n\n2. The initial conversation was general. He at first commented on how well he liked the two books he had received from me, and made some statements on the truth of their context. We ordered some breakfast and I then asked him if he would mind filling out the questionnaire (PRQ) I had with me, explaining that it was merely routine. He readily agreed and I gave it to him and helped him fill it out. (PRQ submitted on 12 March). After completing the form I brought out a list of questions I wanted to ask and began going through them. He answered all of those he could, providing the following information:\n\n   Rafael Martinez, Owner of the Plaza Hotel:\n\n   Rafael does not remember Martinez full name but promised to obtain it at the first opportunity. Martinez has a wife and son. The wife originally comes from Santander, Spain. His son (no name remembered) is about 18 or 19 years of age, (8 years ago, now about 26) and at times was helping around the desk of the hotel when Rafael was teaching his father Russian. (1960-1961). Rafael gave Martinez Russian for about 6 months, during which time Martinez learned to speak and understand fairly well. Martinez never discussed why he wanted to learn Russian with Rafael, nor did they talk politics, either Russian or American.\nWhen Rafael met PRINNOKO (P-2273) at the Plaza Hotel, PRINNOKO later mentioned that he had some business with MARTINEZ concerning tourists and tourism, but did not expound on the subject. MARTINEZ never discussed his association with PRINNOKO and Subject did not ask. During the latter part of 1962 Rafael went to the hotel and by chance saw four or five Soviets in MARTINEZ office. He heard them talking, but did not go into the office. He thinks he has seen one of these Russians since but does not know the name of any of them. MARTINEZ never mentioned them or their business with him. In September 1968, just prior to the Olympics, Rafael went to see MARTINEZ, trying to drum up some more private Russian lessons. MARTINEZ told him that he was ready to take any more Russian lessons, but that he was very interested in learning German as soon as possible. MARTINEZ said that he was currently (then) taking lessons, but that he did not like his teacher. (Did not say who his teacher was). Rafael offered to bring a teacher from his Institute. MARTINEZ mentioned that the German Olympic team would be staying at his hotel. Shortly after Rafael brought a girl from the Institute named Gerda (LNU) to see MARTINEZ. While there they were invited to lunch and met three Mexican men and a tall German who said he was a representative of the German team. They had lunch, conversed about general things, and Rafael and the girl left. The girl later said that MARTINEZ had continued taking German lessons from his old teacher. This was the last time Rafael saw MARTINEZ. Rafael could supply no biographical data on MARTINEZ, or any further information on any connections with Soviets. Subject has not heard any other Soviet mention either MARTINEZ or the Plaza Hotel.\n\nB. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOGINOV (P-11712) AND JUAN LUIS, DIRECTOR OF THE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE ON TIBER:\n\nIn about 1965 or 1966, LOGINOV went to the Institute to take English lessons. He took lessons for about 6 to 8 months. The lessons were private, but given at the Institute by an American girl named Janet (LNU - Rafael does not remember her last name, and she is no longer there). It was in this manner that JUAN LUIS met LOGINOV.\nJUAN LUIS mentioned to Rafael that he liked LOGINOV, and they seemed fairly friendly. It was at the end of this period that Rafael was introduced to LOGINOV by JUAN LUIS. When LOGINOV terminated his lessons he no longer visited the Institute. JUAN LUIS often sent his regards to LOGINOV via Rafael, and asked that LOGINOV come to see him. This was mentioned by Rafael, but LOGINOV continually told Rafael to \"forget it\", but did ask Rafael to return the regards. Rafael never questioned LOGINOV on why he did not go back to the Institute, but as far as Subject knows, LOGINOV has not been back. Rafael has had many discussions with JUAN LUIS but he has never mentioned any other Soviets in Mexico. As far as his politics go, JUAN LUIS is a confirmed Leftist in ideas but Rafael would not call him a Communist. Rafael believes that Juan Luis was merely a friend to LOGINOV and had no direct relations with him other than their association through lessons.\n\nC. Andrea CATANO (P-13,946):\n\nAndrea has mentioned to Rafael that she met CHERNISH (P-13,042) at the Space Exhibit while she was working there. She also met several other Soviets there. She became friends with them and invited them to her house for a dinner party on two occasions. Rafael, invited by her, went on both occasions. On the first occasions there was a Russian woman, blond, about 36 years old named VALENTINA (LNU) who spoke very good Spanish; a man named MISHA (LNU), supposedly an Electrical Tech from DUBRO Space Center near Moscow, about 37 years old and tall, who spoke excellent Spanish and who later wrote a letter to one of Andrea's girlfriends in Mexico City (not named); and BORIS (LNU), about 37 years old, thin, nervous but with a lot of vitality and personality. Boris spoke excellent Spanish also, and Rafael thought it very unusual that he drank American Whiskey and Coca-cola. (Rafael says this is unusual for Russians). Rafael thought MISHA a little suspicious, that he might be KGB (he knows that in cases such as this, no one is allowed to go anywhere with being accompanied by the KGB) because MISHA spoke excellent Spanish and seemed to be the only one who did not really fit.\nThe other Soviet was named VLADIMIR (LVM), about 57 years old, and did not speak any Spanish at all, but was very nice. According to Rafael, he was the only true scientist there, (also from Cuba).\n\nAt the second party the Russian woman did not come. Andrea American boss from the exhibit came however with a Mexican man. (Rafael does not remember his name). Rafael says he was a nice guy. He was about 43 years old, tall and smoked a cigar. He joked with the Russians and told them to be careful because Andrea was his spy. They all laughed. He came with two dark Mexicans and left shortly after dinner. Rafael said he drank a considerable amount and left drunk. CHIRYSH did not attend either of these parties. Andrea however invited him over on other occasions. On one occasion CHIRYSH brought another Soviet to Andrea whom he said was a military man. (No name mentioned by Andrea). Andrea said that this one was a pain in the ass because he was so serious it through the group (her mother also) into a depressed state. After the exhibit CHIRYSH started calling Andrea at home and inviting her to meet him in various cafes, which she did. He cautioned her to never call him at the embassy. He was invited to her house many times and often sat and discussed his politics (any all other topics) with her and her mother. Her mother took issue with his politics. Her mother liked CHIRYSH but does not know that Andrea is seeing him on the side. She would not approve of Andrea going out with CHIRYSH at all. CHIRYSH began making amorous advances to Andrea and tried to talk her into going to bed with him. Andrea told Rafael that he is a very nice guy, she liked him, but was afraid. She said that he almost convinced her to go to bed, and that it is her decision that she is no longer going to see CHIRYSH for fear of doing so. Rafael had cautioned her about what she had to lose if she did. She continues to like CHIRYSH however.\n\nAndrea had a party on 1 March and asked Rafael to invite LOGINOV. CHIRYSH went to this party. Rafael did not bother to ask LOGINOV at all.\nAndrea has often extended an invitation to LOGINOV through Rafael, but when Rafael mentions this to LOGINOV, LOGINOV has told him to forget it because other people from his Embassy are seeing her and LOGINOV does not want to appear there and cause trouble. LOGINOV did not expound and Rafael did not ask further explanation. Rafael thinks that CHERNYSHEV really wants to take Andrea to bed, but he also thinks that CHERNYSHEV is up to other things also. He has no idea what, but just suspects.\n\n3. The meeting with Rafael, after three hours, was cut short at this time because he had some obligations. His general daily schedule is as follows:\n\nMonday: 1500-1600 Classes at the Institute, general.\n1630-1730 Private classes at the Institute.\n\nTuesday: 1000-1100 Private lessons for ABRIANA at Institute.\n1130-1230 \" \" \" MUNOZ \" \"\n1500-1600 Classes at Institute, general.\n1600-1730 Classes at Institute, Private.\n\nWednesday 1500-1600 Classes at Institute\n1830-1930 Private lessons on Palms to CHRISTINA\n2000-2100 Private lessons, John BLANKENHAG\n\nThursday 1500-1600 Classes at Institute\n1630-1730 Classes at Institute\n1830-1930 Private lessons, Maria LUIZ\n2000-2100 Private Lessons, John BLANKENHAG\n\nFriday 1500-1600 Lessons at Institute\n1600-1730 Lessons at Institute.\n\nAt the end of the meeting I gave him an envelope with 1,000.00 pesos in cash in it. He accepted it graciously and said that that would last him about 24 hours considering the debts he had to pay. He laughed. I brought out a receipt and asked him if he would mind signing it for me. I said it was for accounting purposes (he did not ask). He said \"Sure\" and signed it immediately. We left the restaurant, walked to his car, and said goodbye until next meeting.\nWe stood by the car talking for about three minutes, and I promised to call him during the afternoon of Friday, 14 May. On departing he grinned and said to say hello to all of his associates that he doesn't know. I said \"Sure will\" and walked away.\n\nSamuel J. Kartsuk\n\nNote: I asked him to finish one with a complete small, reasonably and character which are legion. He off later to be some are all times he has had contact with.\n\nS.J.K.\n\nSeems to be coming along very much - J.P.R.\nSalida el (651153).-1330.-Valent\u00edn y Heche quedan de verse el s\u00e1bado a las 1000h. en el club para jugar y Valent\u00edn pide le avisa a Bill. Heche acepta.- 771.----------\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\n\nCOMES MADE\n\n110960\n\n-5 MAR. 1960\n1. Date: LIRAIN/1\n2. Date & Site of Meeting: 12/06, 5/3/69; Reform Hotel 7/2.\n3. Next Meeting: 12/09, 12/3/69; Camino Real Hotel.\n4. Reports/Information Given by Agent:\n\nLIRAIN/1 gave Roston four pages for insertion into the HUMINT target notebook which he had previously prepared and turned over to the Station.\n\nLIRAIN/1 also gave Roston a memo on his recommendations with regard to the outstanding balance of the loan to LIRAIN (1,000.00 pesos), in which LIRAIN/1 proposes to see LIRAIN once more and to obtain from him a receipt acknowledging the outstanding balance of the original loan.\n\nA third report given to Roston reveals what appears to have been an approach made to LIRAIN/1 by Valentin Loguinov on 2 February, 1959, at the home of a mutual friend, Luis Gomez. Loguinov again made reference to his previous allegations concerning LIRAIN/1's affiliation with WCMACT but this time said that he was prepared to pay \"a lot\" of money for any information LIRAIN/1 might obtain for him. L/1 reported to Roston that he financed as best he could, alleging that the only person he was close to in the WCMACT complex was an official in the economic section. LIRAIN/1 commented to Roston that he felt certain at this point that Loguinov was bluffing concerning his having actually seen L/1 with WCMACT officers \"several times\" in Caracas and that this was a prelude to an approach to LIRAIN/1 that Loguinov had been planning for some time.\n\n5. Administrative:\n\nLIRAIN/1 gave Roston an accounting for his 1,500 peso revolving fund which showed a total of disbursements of 12,078.75. L/1 explained that this sudden increase in his expenditures was due to his new operations against the PAREXEN target. He stated that he expected the following recurring expenses every month:\n\n- LIRAIN/1 salary: 1,500.00\n- LIRAIN/1's rent: 1,500.00\n- LIRAIN/1's salary: 1,500.00\n- LIRAIN/1's rent: 1,500.00\n- Rent for 6th meeting with WCMACT: 1,500.00\n- Miscellaneous: 1,500.00\nSince these recurring expenses would be a minimum of 17,000.00 pesos per month, LIREMA/1 requested that his revolving fund be increased from 1,500.00 to 12,000.00, and that Newton, in addition to reimbursing him for the 9,078.75 he spent in excess of his last advance, give him an additional 12,000.00 pesos as his new revolving fund so that he would be able to pay the operational expenses required.\n\n6. Guidance/Information Given to Agent:\n\nNewton agreed with LIREMA/1 concerning the approach of Loguinov and promised to give I/1 Station guidance on his future relationship with Loguinov. Newton asked I/1 to move very cautiously with regard to implicating the WOLADY economics officer before receiving specific guidance from the Station.\n\nNewton promised to refer the request for an increased revolving fund to the Station in the hope of having the necessary money at the next meeting.\n\nWallace B. Newton\nSUBJECT: Valentin Logunov\nDATE OF INFORMATION: February 2, 1969\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Party at the home of Dr. Luis Gomez.\n\nOur tennis group meets occasionally at each others homes, for lunch, dinner, or just drinks. Luis Gomez invited us this time to his home in Xxxx Pedregal for lunch.\n\nAfter I had made a point of not sitting near Val, several women wanted to change places and Val and another person changed places putting Val next to me.\n\nHe opened the old issue by saying that he assumed I was working for the company. He said that he had seen me personally \"several times\" at Sanborns with American intelligence officers. I asked who he saw me with. He avoided the question. I then volunteered that it must have been Bill Spruce, with whom I frequently have lunch. He asked what section Spruce was in. I answered the economic. He seemed disgusted, and said Spruce wasn't worth anything.\n\nVal then said that he wanted me to know that he was prepared to pay a lot of money for any information I might obtain for him. I said I'd talk to Spruce about it and see if he had anything to sell so that I could take my commission. I added that Spruce would probably faint or tremble with terror\u2014this pleased Val greatly.\n\nI then asked Val if the Americans had ever offered him any money for his information. He averted my eyes and answered \"not yet.\"\n\nCOMMENTS\n\nVal is an ass!\n\n\"Several times\" is, of course, inaccurate and shows that he is guessing. It seems very unlikely that he saw me even the one time.\n\nVal probably regrets that we have not approached him. But he is not so stupid that he does not realize that we know he has no trade, profession, skills, or talents which would make life for him anywhere outside of Russia and government service possible. Val is doing the only thing he knows how, and he knows it, and he must realize that we know it. Hence, defection for him is out of the question. He would only make a short-term profit in doing so.\n\nI have invited Bill Spruce to lunch this week. I will develop him as my excuse and answer for any further provocations by Val. Spruce, incidentally, is a very clever and helpful person. My last meeting with him was two years ago and I am still benefitting from his advice. He has since transferred to the finance section, but this should not affect his value to me and my cover.\nSUBJECT: Valentin Logunov\nDATE OF INFORMATION: February 1, 1969, 1200 hours.\nPLACE ACQUIRED: French Club\n\nInterest in American School. Val asked me if I could recall the address of the American school. He will call me for it. He wants to have his son Dmitri participate in some activities with the children at the school in order to learn English. Dmitri finishes school at the Russian embassy at 1400 hours. Val hopes that maybe there are some afterschool activities such as football for Dmitri.\n\nCOMMENT\n\nThis may be just Val's innate stupidity. Maybe he really couldn't find the American School in the telephone directory.\n\nPerhaps Val already knows of some after-school activity of which I am unaware. Maybe he already knows that someone's child is there, someone he wants to meet. Perhaps he wants an excuse to wander about the school, meeting people.\n\nPerhaps Val couldn't care less about the school. Perhaps he is hoping for an excuse to call me, suggesting our children practice English together. Perhaps he is preparing the ground to go to someone else he already has in mind to explain that there is no convenient program of after-school activities for Dmitri. He might ask that person to agree to have Dmitri play with his children.\n\nIt just occurred to me that for the first time in many months Valentin spoke Russian to me. While I was playing tennis he shouted to me in Russian, \"You really are playing with your left now.\" And later, \"You look tired.\" When I answered that I was and that I had a head-ache, he looked particularly pleased. Normally he doesn't even answer my Good Morning in Russian. Perhaps he is preparing the way for me to suggest an exchange in language lessons; he helps me with my Russian and I help my boys play with Dimi in English.\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE FILE\n\nSUBJECT: Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (P-11712)\n\nAttached are five LIEMBRACE Soviet Target of Opportunity reports which cover the period 12 December 1968 which was the first surveillance to four follow-up surveillance reports on the first one. On 12 December 1968 the LIEMBRACE team picked up LOGINOV in Colonia Buenos Aires in the company of an unidentified Mexican man. The LIEMBRACE team followed the Mexican man, who got into a Renault Dauphine with placas 390 HS. A LIKAYAK check revealed that the placas were listed to Ignacio VALLINA Barros and Susana de VALLINA Fabre. A further LIKAYAK check revealed that the VALLINAS did not live at this Adolfo Prieto address and no further action was planned.\n\nOn Thursday, 2 January 1969, LIEMBRACE-5 went into Sears Department Store on Ejercito Nacional and thought that the store detective was identical to the man spotted with LOGINOV on 12 December 1968. LIEMBRACE-14 said that although the store detective looked a lot like the man seen with LOGINOV, he was not identical. Photos of this store detective are attached.\n\nOn Friday, 3 January 1969 the LIEMBRACE team went to Sears Store on Ejercito Nacional to check out this store detective. The people at Sears said that if a name were given to them, they would cooperate.\n\nOn Thursday, 9 January 1969, the LIEMBRACE team picked up the store detective as he was leaving work. The store detective went to a house at Lago Chico 142-A. Prior to that he went to an address at Avenida Claveria 84-1.\n\nOn Friday 10 January 1969 the LIEMBRACE team gave us the result of a check at these addresses. They are the following:\nSECRET\n\nName of the store detective: Jaime LOZANO Sanchez\nLago Chico 142-A, apartment 12-A\n\nName and address of his \"girlfriend\": Avenida Claveria 34-1\nLeonor LEAL widow de MEDICIS.\n\nThis information is for the file. No concrete results of the LIEMBRACE check were obtained, as the man who got into the Renault with places 380 US does not appear to be identifiable with the Sears store detective.\n\nGraced: ARMILANT\nPhotos of Lee\nYou did it\nTaken by Lembke Team\n311 Thursday\n3 Jan 1969\nSOURCE: LIEMBRACE\n\nDATE: Viernes 10 de enero de 1969.\n\nFILE:\n\nSUBJECT: Investigaci\u00f3n del detective de la tienda Sears Roebuck, Ej\u00e9rcito Nacional.\n\nNombre: Jaime Lozano S\u00e1nchez\nDirecci\u00f3n: Lago Chica No. 142-A, interior 12-A.\nDomicilio de su amiga, tal vez su amante: Av. Claver\u00eda No. 64-1. Su nombre es L\u00e9onora Leal Vda. de Medici.\nSUBJECT: Surveillance of Suspect contact of Soviet-LOGNOV\n\n1930 Presentes en Sears Roebuck de M\u00e9xico, S.A., Ej\u00e9rcito Nacional.\n\n1947 Sale el sujeto por la puerta de empleados. Lleva una bolsa grande de papel de la tienda.\n\n1949 Sube a un plymouth, 1949, color azul, placas No. 768 G\u00c1 que estaba dentro del estacionamiento de Sears y se va.\n\n2005 Se estaciona frente a un edificio de deptos. que est\u00e1 en la Av. Claver\u00eda No. 84 Z.P 16.\n\nAntes de llegar aqu\u00ed dio varias vueltas innecesarias, como chec\u00e1ndose.\n\n2008 Se baja del carro con la bolsa de papel. Entra al edificio y entra al depto. No. 1 en la planta baja.\n\n2010 Sale del edificio. Parece que no le abrieron. Sube al carro y permanece ah\u00ed.\n\n2015 Sale una mujer del edificio. Se acerca al carro y habla con el sujeto y \u00e9ste se baja del carro con la bolsa y entra con la mujer al depto. No. 1. La mujer abre con llave.\n\n2120 Sale el sujeto solo. Sube a su carro y se va.\n\n2123 Entra a una vecindad que est\u00e1 en Lago Chiem No. 142-A y abre con llave a la vivienda No. 12 o 13, no se pudo ver bien porque estaba muy oscuro.\n\n2145 Cancelamos.\n\nNOTA: No pudimos preguntar por \u00e9l en Sears, porque no estaba la empleada de Personal.\nSUBJECT: Investigaci\u00f3n sobre el detective de Sears Roebuck, Ej\u00e9rcito Nacional.\n\nEn las oficinas de personal nos dijeron que ten\u00edan 10 detectives y que no nos pod\u00edan proporcionar los nombres de todos; que si nosotros si les d\u00e1bamos el nombre de la persona que nos interesaba, ellos nos dar\u00edan los datos que solicitamos.\n\nThis appears to be somewhat in the dark but if you wish I will give you the name Ignacio VELINA Barros - to whom plates 380 HS are registered?\n\nWhy not?\n\nS\u00ed!\nSOURCE: LIEUTENANT\n\nDATE: Jueves 2 de Enero de 1969.\n\nPARTICIPANTS: 1, 5, 14.\n\nFILE:\n\nSUBJECT: Surveillance of the suspect serial contact\n\nEn un reporte del d\u00eda 18 de Diciembre de 1963, en el que 5 y 14 vieron a LOGINOV acompa\u00f1ado de un hombre tipo mexicano caminando por un puente de peatones del viaducto Miguel Aleman que est\u00e1 a la altura de la calle Eje Dos. Y que despu\u00e9s este \u00faltimo se fue en un Renault negro, placas No. 590 HS, y lo perdieron entrando al viaducto.\n\n5 fue el martes 31 a la tienda Sears de Ej\u00e9rcito Nacional y le pareci\u00f3 que el detective de esta tienda es el mismo que se vio con LOGINOV. Llevamos a 14 para que tambi\u00e9n lo identificara. Dice 14 que se parece mucho, pero que no es. 5 dice que est\u00e1 seguro que s\u00ed es.\n\nEn la descripci\u00f3n que dieron ellos ese d\u00eda dijeron que en la cara se le ve\u00eda como que hab\u00eda tenido acne, y este no tiene ninguna marca de esas. De todas maneras lo fotografiamos.\n\nBuscamos el Renault en el estacionamiento y no estaba.\nSUBJECT: Surveillance of Soviet target of opportunity\n\n1358 Se localiza en el puente de peatones del Viaducto Miguel Aleman, a la altura de la Calle Bjo-2, Col. Buenavista, a Loginov atravesando el puente a pie acompa\u00f1ado de un hombre tipo mexicano, como de 35 a 40 a\u00f1os, 1.75 m. de estatura, 80 kgs., pelo negro ondulado, con entradas grandes a los lados, cejas gruesas, tez morena, cutis lleno de cicatrices de acn\u00e9, vestido con traje completo caf\u00e9 claro y corbata.\n\n1401 Se despiden en Concepci\u00f3n Mendoza y Dr. Andrade. Se cancela a Loginov.\n\n1412 El sujeto llega al restaurante Amancio Tapatio de Ni\u00f1o Perdido y Obrero Mundial. Recorre el restaurante, como buscando a alguien.\n\n1415 Sale y espera en la puerta.\n\n1500 Entra nuevamente al restaurante y habla por tel\u00e9fono. No se pudo ver el n\u00famero ni escuchar nada por que hab\u00eda m\u00fasica de mariachi dentro del restaurante.\n\n1508 Termina de hablar por tel\u00e9fono y sale y se va caminando.\n\n1511 Sube a un Renault Dauphine, 1961, negro, maltratado, placas 580 HS, que estaba estacionado en las calles de Esparta y Bol\u00edvar. Se va.\n\n1516 Se pierde en la entrada al Viaducto, rumbo al Oriente. No se pudo alcanzar porque detr\u00e1s de \u00e9l entraron tres carros lentamente y ya no se pudo localizar.\n\nCOPIES MADE\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE FILE\n\nSUBJECT: New Soviet Embassy Car\n\nLILYIC reported that Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (P-11712) entered the Soviet Embassy on 23 February 1969 in a 1969 Chevrolet Chevelle. LOGINOV, according to LILYIC, was scheduled to go to the border the week of 16 Feb 1969 to pick up his new car.\n\nSECRET\n\nHLES: 50-8-10/7\ncc: P-11712\nHe was very much in favor of the writers who have been suppressed in Russia. Subject said that when he first arrived in Mexico his major desire was to visit a bookstore. When he managed to visit one he was amazed at the variety of literature for sale which was absolutely banned to Russians. He could not help feeling nervous while in the bookstore, and later cried when he got home. (Due to the sections he said). At the first opportunity he began buying and reading all of the books he could afford. It took him a long time in order to be able to sit in a public area and openly read a book without feeling some kind of fear.\n\nAs regards to Cuba, he has heard conflicting stories. He believes that Castro has done some good for the Cubans, (by raising their standard education level), but that from stories he has heard, the Cubans had a much higher economic standard of living (than Mexico) prior to the Castro regime. He has often discussed these politics with LOGINOV. In a crowd LOGINOV tends to say good things about Castro and the Cuban regime, but when alone with Subject LOGINOV sneers at Castro and condemns the regime. This attitude leads Subject to believe that the official Soviet attitude (real attitude) towards Cuba is one of disgust. During discussions in a group, LOGINOV has stated that they (Soviets) are not in favor of Guerillas operating in Central and South America. He has repeated this while privately talking with Subject.\n\nDuring part of the conversation I began telling him about the standards of living in the U.S. and what it might be like living there. We discussed different parts of the U.S. in terms of Geography and what it had to offer. Subject repeated that his wife always thought that it would be devine living in the U.S. and that he still had hopes of going there in the future to live.\nDuring about 1947 or 1948, I was in London offering to stand living there a Soviet passport. The Soviet Embassy in the Russian Embassy. Every three months they had to go (individually) to an office with an official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to pick up a slip of paper from the host, who was an old Russian Colonel. They then took this slip of paper back to the apartment where they lived and presented it to the person in charge of the apartment. The person then wrote on the slip that they had permission to live there for three months. They returned to the embassy where the Colonel stamped it and put his initials. This had to be done every three months. Whenever they traveled they had to take this slip with them. Subject thinks that their travel was limited to 500 or 600 kilometers, but is not sure. He said the Colonel became a good friend of his and later advised him not to get a Soviet passport since it might limit his traveling in the free world. Prior to leaving Russia he was not interviewed by anyone or asked any questions.\n\nHe has known LOGINOV about 3 years. He was introduced to LOGINOV three years ago by JUAN LUIS, the director of the Language Institute (where Subject now works). After the introduction they went to the Director's apartment on Saturday for drinks and he became friendly with LOGINOV. Prior to about 6 months ago LOGINOV had merely been a friend, but had indicated that Subject offer information on his students. In the past six months LOGINOV has made about three direct offers, outlining that Subject prepare and give him personal information on his students, especially those who might be in a position to go to the States. (He wants the usual personal information, including their attitude towards Americans). Subject has refused LOGINOV on each occasion. He said that he did not attend the meeting arranged for Saturday, 1 February, because he slept late and was not interested. He had previously said that the meeting was on the corners of FDR and KENNEDY, but during this meeting he said he was in error. The meeting was supposed to be on the corners of FDR and KENNEDY.\n\nContact report\n\nName: KAFTASOV\n\nSubject: Rafael Vidalova Ray\n\nDate: 8 January 1969\nSubject met PRIKHOZHO in the Plaza Hotel (See previous Contract Report). PRIKHOZHO was there to meet the owner, and after they (he and PRIKHOZHO met) talked by the phone booth they went to the bar to meet the owner. The owner did not show up and they then went to PRIKHOZHO's apartment where Subject stayed for dinner. While there he met CHIRKISH. Subject said that CHIRKISH did not ever try to recruit him for anything (he said that I must have misunderstood him during the previous meeting. CHIRKISH is playing around with ANDRA, who can go to the S. anytime she wants. He said I must have mistaken him). CHIRKISH is about 37 years old and ANDRA just turned 17. ANDRA has told Subject that she has kissed CHIRKISH on several occasions and really likes him. Subject is very angry about this and says that CHIRKISH has no business picking on ANDRA, and he knows that CHIRKISH (Subject) is up to no good. Subject would like to put a stop to this but does not know how. (I used this as an argument but to no avail).\n\nPRIKHOZHO is a friend of engineer (EN) MARTINEZ, a Mexican who owns the hotel PLAZA and the HACIENDA VISTA MIRADA. MARTINEZ is not about 60 years old. Subject taught MARTINEZ Russian about 6 years ago and has not seen him since. During this time he also taught a man named Miguel MORA, a Mexican engineer, and he since visited Chirikov's house. MORA is like a brother to MARTINEZ. Subject is not aware of the connections between the three.\n\nSubject's father lives in subject (as resident) and writes to the family (both he and his mother in one letter) about once a week or less. Subject\n\nSubject is a writer of the Daily in Moscow, writes political articles, etc.\nSUBJECT: Gloria Pinto\n\nDATE OF INFORMATION: January 31, 1969, 2100-2200 hours.\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Restaurant Nomadica, Nica.\n\nA group of ten of us celebrated New Year's Eve together.\n\nBusiness at Soviet embassy. Gloria wants to purchase a foreign lamb coat. Alexandra Borodinov has one she would be willing to sell, but Gloria believes it would be too hot for Mexico, having been lined for Moscow weather. Gloria thinks that the commercial counselor of the Soviet embassy would be interested, willing, and able to help her in obtaining a Soviet coat.\n\nGloria also wants to open a shop. She thought that maybe she could handle imported Soviet goods. Her children are now old enough to take care of themselves, she feels unneeded, hence the interest in opening a shop. She has checked with the Comino Real and learned that shop space rents for 12000 pesos per month. She would probably work for someone else for a while to learn the problems involved, before opening her own shop. She admits to very little education. She has never worked in her life.\n\nWants help from me. The last time I saw Gloria she reminded me that on New Year's Eve I promised to give her problem some thought. Frankly, there is something she could do for my cover business. I need someone who is attractive, mature, but not necessarily very intelligent, and not necessarily very experienced, to contact potential clients, to sell a service. I think Gloria could fit this requirement. I had in mind a commission agent: someone who would receive no salary, but would receive a 20% percentage each month of the income due to clients she obtained. Let's say she would bring me 100 clients over a period of two or three years. Let's say further that each client would represent an income of 250 pesos per month. She would receive .20 x 250 x 100 = 5000 pesos per month as long as those clients continued, and whether she continued to work for me or not. She could work as little or as much as she wanted, though I would probably set a quota of one new client per week. She would end up the year making 2500 pesos per month, averaging 1250 pesos per month over the year. She has her own car. I would probably reimburse her for gasoline and entertainment expenses.\nI mention this in some detail because I think it really would suit Gloria and would help my business. If I used her, it would probably preclude her use viciously against the Soviets. Further, before using her, some thought ought to be given to the possibility that she might already be working for the Soviets (which I doubt) and could be targeted against us.\n\nSoviets interest in Gloria. I would not attempt to explain why the Soviets might be interested in Gloria as a target. My guesses would be a waste of time considering that the Soviet section has probably given this sort of thing a great deal of experienced thought. I do believe that Valentin and Gloria might be having an affair for strictly personal and non-operational reasons. I further believe that Valentin might actually be paying his own way at the French Club to pursue a sport he is fairly good at and enjoys\u2014and not as an excuse to go to the French Club to find potential recruits.\n\nOur interest in Gloria. I can see a possible use of Gloria if recruited by false Mexican secret service. The scenario would go something like this:\n\nWe (the Mexican secret service) have observed that she (Gloria) has been seen in the company of Valentin. We know Valentin to be a very dangerous and destructive person to Mexico.\n\nWould she be willing to report on Valentin, his personality, his views, his activities as far as she is aware of them.\n\n(Later) Would she be willing to make comments which would encourage Valentin to try to recruit her. Such comments would be that she has met diplomats from various embassies, knows students who are anarchists and communists, is growing more and more disappointed with the U.S. foreign policy, especially since that imperialist Nixon has taken over, etc.\n\nUltimate use. The eventual value of Gloria would be:\n\n1. Report vulnerabilities of Val.\n2. Report the content when Val is discontented, critical of his superiors, ready to defect.\n3. Report what at least some of the targets of the Soviets might be\u2014namely her assignments from Val.\n3. Report what at least some of the targets of the Soviets might be\u2014namely her assignments from Val.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nFROM: Samuel J. KANTASUK\n\nSUBJECT: Rafael VIZUELLA, contact with on 29 January 1969.\n\n1. KANTASUK left his car in a parking lot in the Zone 30 and walked to the vicinity of Sanborns on Reform and Tiber. At 12:05 I called the language school where Subject teaches and was told that he had not yet arrived for class. I called again at 1:05 and was informed that he was already in class. At 1:45 I began waiting in front of the Language school for Subject to come out. He came out at 1610 and we walked towards Sanborns. I invited him to go to La Mansion Restaurant on Insurgentes Sur but he said that he had a class scheduled from 1630 to 1800. We went to the Sanborns bar and had a drink. I told him that I thought that two girls I had previously not were going to meet me at the La Mansion at 1700 and that I wanted him to go with me. After some discussion he decided that he could postpone the class until Friday, but would have to wait until 1630 for the pupil to arrive, in order to inform her. We left the bar at 1630 and encountered the student by the magazine stand. Subject made his excuses, and we started walking to his car. (Subject had not wanted to miss his class, and after some discussion in the bar, he offered me his car in order that I might go to La Mansion and get the girls. I told him that I also wanted to eat, and that there was a possibility that the girls wouldn't show up. He finally consented after some consideration).\n\nWe arrived at La Mansion shortly before 1700 and went inside, leaving the car parked in the Restaurant lot. After sitting down and ordering drinks and a steak, I told him that I would like to discuss a few important items that had a lot to do with his future. (I had mentioned during the previous meeting that I had some business to talk to him about). I began by telling him that in our relationship I had neglected to mention something important. I told him that my meeting him in Acapulco was not an accident. I had gone there for the express purpose of meeting him after considerable planning. Subject just sat there with a blank, numb look on his face, and asked me if I were the U.S.\nor the Police, or something. I said \"no, I'm an Intelligence Officer for the U.S. Government,\" and showed him my I.D. card. He looked at it, raised his eyebrows, but never changed the expression on his face. (From the look on his face, one might think he was watching a Bugs Bunny cartoon). I said that our files show that for some years he has considerable contact with members of the Soviet KGB. Before I could go any further he stated that he was not a member of the KGB, nor did he ever work for them. I said that that was what we believed, and that was also why I wanted to talk to him. I had a proposition to make to him. Before I could continue, he said that he had often been approached (Currently and in the past) by the KGB to work for them. At present he is being hounded by Valentin (LOGINOV) to report on his Mexican friends. He considers the KGB to be a bunch of bastards (Cabrera) and that he does not believe in all of this under the table saying, nor does he believe in what the KGB are trying to do, and if I'm involved in this work, and I am asking him the same thing, then I'm the same kind of bastard that the KGB are. He said for some time now, LOGINOV has called him, met him, and asked that he (Subject) meet Mexicans (students) who are either going to the U.S. or look like they might be promising in that respect, and that he (Subject) prepare biographical data and other details about their current life, and arrange for them to meet LOGINOV at parties, etc. LOGINOV, during each meeting with Subject, brings an envelope with 500 pesos in cash in it, and continually offers this to Subject. Subject says that he doesn't say yes or no, but that to date he has not furnished any information and has not accepted any money. He likes his friends and students, and any cooperation with LOGINOV (along these lines) would make him feel like a Judas. Besides, these students are young, and nice people, and the KGB bastards should keep their hands off them. He said that he appreciated the fact that I immediately showed him an official I.D. card and declared myself, because LOGINOV did not even have the decency to do that. LOGINOV has never showed him anything at all (in I.D.)\nand never even extended the courtesy of telling him why he wanted the\ninformation on Mexican students, but Subject knew LOSINOV in KGB and doesn't\nappreciate the approach by LOSINOV. If LOSINOV had approached him honestly,\nshowed him I.D. and talked about the idealism involved in what he wanted,\nSubject might have paid more attention, but he (Subject) did not like the\ndishonest way LOSINOV went about it, offering money and trying to con him.\nSubject said, granted, he needs money, and the 500 pesos always looks good,\nbut that if he started doing what LOSINOV wanted, the sight of the money would\nmake him sick afterwards. I told him that we were not interested in his\nstudents, but that we wanted to stop the KGB in their efforts to undermine\nother nations and direct sabotage against the U.S. He might not like the idea\nof under-the-table dealing, but it was a real fact of life. If it were not\nfor the current under-the-table conflict, the world would probably be rushed\ninto a nuclear war, and he knew what that meant. What was going on in the\nespionage field was actually a deterrent, and that the people involved were\ncomposed of the best minds of two worlds. I recalled his (Subject) two world\npowers opinions (previously expressed by him) and asked him what he planned to\ndo. He couldn't return to Russia; his current future prospects in Mexico were\nnot too promising, and he had previously mentioned that he wanted to go to the\nU.S. If it's true that there are only two important powers in the world, then\nhe had better seriously consider where he wants to place his marbles. Opportunity\ndoesn't knock every day, and he was talking to a representative of the U.S.\nGovernment at the moment, who was making a proposition directly to him (Subject).\nSubject said that that was all true; he at first wanted to return to Russia but\nafter seeing some things in Mexico he realized that he could never be happy in\nRussia again because of the oppressive regime and the lack of freedom. (He\ncited the recent Russian invasion of the Czechs and said that it made him sick\nto see the Russians do this). He said that he was not happy in Mexico but that\nhe could live here O.K.\nHe had previously tried to go to the U.S. but had been turned down. In any case, he had made friends here, and this was his life, and he has no intention of either screwing his friends or being an informer, either for the KGB or for their U.S. equivalent. The first person he has to live with is himself, and the realization that he is a spy against his own friends would be enough to mentally ruin him, regardless of any money received. I told him that one of our efforts is trying to block the KGB when they go after people that turn out to be his friends. He can think that he (Subject) is not involved, but that is far from the truth. He may not work for the KGB, but his associations with them have been known for some time and that a thick file already exists on him. I know him personally now, and like him, and if he refuses to work with me I'm obligated to write it up that way. My superiors will later sit down with me and ask the results, and I'll tell them that Rafael is a nice guy, honest, sincere, and I firmly believe that he is completely honest. This however will not answer the question why he will not cooperate, and when it is put on paper it will just be a cold report lacking personality, and the paper will indicate that he might be working for the KGB regardless of any opinions tacked on to the bottom. In a case like this, protocol between the U.S. and Mexican Governments require that we eventually turn over to them any reports on people in their country who might be involved with the Russians in efforts against Mexico.\n\nIn his case, his file would be turned over to the Mexicans and then he can imagine what could happen. By the time the Secret Service stopped harassing him, or he wound up in jail, he would be living a miserable life. All this just for being innocent. For this reason, and for reasons involving the fact that as a real person in a real world he can't afford just to sit on the middle of the fence, he should seriously consider my proposition.\nSubject said that what I mentioned sounded like a threat, and that if it was, it still wouldn't make any difference; he would rather go to jail or be harassed by the police than to cooperate, either with us or the KGB. I told him that what I said was not a threat but a reality, and that he should appreciate the fact that I'm being frank with him instead of trying to do what LOGINOV did, to con him. I was only asking. I was a friend regardless what his decision was, and that if its \"No\", then I'll do everything in my power to see that he remains untouched and unharmed, but that I can't guarantee anything because a bureaucratic structure was involved and I didn't have the final say. I told him that unless everything he had told me during our previous association was complete B.S., then he had a duty to at least consider what I was asking.\n\n(By now we had been at this from 1700 to about 1930). Finally he asked me what I would want of him. I said that I wanted him to work with me directly against the KGB and that I had no interest in his friends or students at all. If he was concerned about the KGB bastards bothering his friends, this was his chance to help me do something about it. We can't operate alone. He has the intelligence, the ability and the opportunity to do a great deal and he should involve himself. If only for the ideals that he has previously expressed.\n\n(He thought about it for a few moments and began to talk about Yuriy CHIRKISH). He said that for instance CHIRKISH was another KGB man who had approached him to report on Americans. LOGINOV had told him that he (LOGINOV) couldn't get along with Americans and consequently was only interested in working with Mexicans, but CHIRKISH tried to recruit Subject to work against Americans. Subject refused.\n\nCHIRKISH however was trying to work on ANDREA (Subject's friend) and this made him damned mad. The girl ANDREA was only about 16 or 17, and a sweet little girl, and they (KGB) had no business trying to pick on her. Subject said that he was in the Plaza hotel one day waiting to make a phone call, and that he heard the man in the phone booth speaking fluent Russian. Then the man got through and said that he was the 1st Secretary and asked Subject if his name was in the...\nThe 1st Secretary said that he recognized Rafael because he had seen his picture. During the conversation the Secretary asked Rafael over to dinner that night and he accepted. When Rafael arrived, he was introduced to Chichkov who made overtures of friendship which later led to the attempted recruitment. In the meantime Rafael had introduced Chichkov to Andrea and now regretted it.\n\n(This led into further conversation about the KGB and I asked him about Chichkov.)\n\nHe said that he has worked for Chichkov but that he had no idea that Chichkov was KGB. Chichkov had never made any attempt to recruit him for anything. He later mentioned that he might know Voskodtikov by first name, but could not be sure of the last name. (I didn't try to describe him.) Subject mentioned other Soviets who are KGB during fast moving conversation but I did not take notes. My aim was the recruitment and I tried to keep the conversation channeled towards that end. During the conversation Subject said that at one time his mother had confided in him that they had tried to recruit her several times in Moscow to work against Spaniards and Latin Americans who visited. The KGB had once threatened her but when she consulted that she would consult her husband, they told her to forget it. He said that she had known many members of the KGB, KGB and now KGB, but that she still refuses to work for them in their business.\n\nAfter considerable more discussion along the same lines, Subject finally thought a bit and said that he would agree to work with me on one condition only. The condition was that I would not ask him to inform on, or work against, any of his friends or students, including Cell, Ventura or Andrea in particular, and that if any thing should happen to him as a result of his work for me, that I would promise to take care of his wife and child. I agreed to his condition, restating that my only concern was the KGB. I said however that in the future if I could prove to him, or convince him, that any of his local acquaintances were directly involved with the KGB then I would expect him to help me.\nHe said that was fair enough. He said that today, 20 January, he had a\nrestaurant date with LOGINOV at 1230. He was to meet LOGINOV at a\nrestaurant on the corner of Ave. Paseo and Paseo. He wanted to know what he\nshould do with LOGINOV. I told him to be very careful that he doesn't change\nhis attitude one bit, and to continue for the time being with LOGINOV just as\nif nothing at all had happened. I said that the Soviets do have a department...\nat this he interrupted and said \"SHUSH\" and grinned. I said yes, they do\noperate now and then, and that the Soviets would not be very happy to discover\nthat their friend had anything at all to do with us. I said that even though\nwe treat each other as gentlemen, they are capable of being tough at times.\nHe said not to worry, that he was an excellent actor, and LOGINOV would never\nsuspect a thing.\n\nDuring the time I was trying to convince him, he said that I was\nforgetting one thing. He assured me that he was 80% Socialist and 20% capitalist,\nand he firmly believed that Socialism was good for some countries, including\nRussia. He said that because of that he didn't see how I could ever have any\nconfidence in him. I answered by saying that everyone was entitled to their\nideals, and I too believed in certain forms of Socialism. The encouraging thing\nwas that he believed in something, and that was his right as an individual.\nWe in the U.S. are entitled to our beliefs, and are not restricted in our reading\nmatter or what we said on street corners. If he wanted to, he could stand on\nthe steps of the Lincoln monument and give a speech on socialism and no one\nwould bother him provided he didn't cause a riot, disturb the peace or break some\nlocal law. We have Socialists who are still good citizens. He then talked\na little about the restrictions in Russia in reading matter and talking, but\nsaw my point.\n\nBy 2115 we were in agreement on his cooperation with me involving\nthe above mentioned conditions. I asked him to meet me on Wednesday, 5 February,\nat 1230 at CHALUPAS Restaurant on Reforma (just across the Paseo). He\nknew where it was and agreed to meet me. I cautioned him again to be very careful\nin his dealings with LOGINOV and to take precautions as he came to the meeting.\nJust prior to leaving the restaurant he said that after this he was going out and got drunk. (I don't remember where he said he was going, but it might have been CILLA). In cautioning him, he has said that he would not say a word, even to his mother or wife. He left the restaurant at 21:30. He wanted to give me a ride, or have me go get drunk with him, but I said that even though I wouldn't mind it, that three of my associates were waiting about three blocks away for my report, and that I had to tell them what happened...they were very anxious about this. We parted in the doorway and he drove off as I walked in the other direction. I later caught a cab to town and left it in the vicinity of my car.\n\n**REMARKS:**\n\nDuring the conversation Subject mentioned the names of various Soviets, but I was not taking notes and preferred to channel the conversation back to the recruitment pitch. I thought the details could be obtained later if he was recruited.\n\nDuring the pitch the only one who was nervous was me. Subject displayed a \"cool\" which was amazing. When I presented my credentials and the pitch he never batted an eyelash...just continued slightly smiling. I noted no reaction at all. It could be that he still thought I was kidding, or playing some game. In any case, either he works for the other side, or he is indeed cool to an admirable point.\n\nWe (I) talked from 1700 to about 2030 without making any headway. Up until that time I had gotten an emphatic \"NO\". I almost gave up before another approach produced a little result. I think that prior assessments which state that he will do anything for money is entirely false. At the moment the recruitment is still on thin ice, and subject is serious about involving his friends. Perhaps after he gets his feet wet (if it lasts that long) and has some experience he can be brought around to do almost anything.\nFor the meanwhile however I would be very careful not to cast any reflections on his friends, (left or not) the Russian people, Republican Spaniards in general, or anything else that he has expressed a definite opinion on. If all of the foregoing is really legitimate, the success of the recruitment so far has been due to friendship and my willingness to see just about everything his way. This will take time to change.\n\nSincerely,\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\n\nThis letter date is really good for some reason.\n\nI would expect some further cooperation.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\nA. What did he say after pitch?\nB. What did he say when he was asked to see the officer in the room?\nC. What did he tell the officer?\nD. Who was the KGB officer that he tried to recruit? Where? Details.\nE. Being contact with the KGB was useful? Can government help in case of KGB involvement?\nF. When, where did he apply to go to US? Details.\nG. Did he approach by himself?\nH. Did he contact KGB officer in Canada?\nI. Did he know that they took an interest in him? What specific exhibit did he have to show? Spies, Sears, local Sears in his name...\n(1) Query: Of the 1st. - did he come with him? (If so, in contact with more?)\n\n(2) Concerning not reporting on friends - cite Andrew Carter as good example - they did to\n\nThis - need his help.\n30 January 1969\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: C/Cuba\n\nFROM: C/IC\n\nSUBJECT: LIREALM-1's Soviet Contacts at the French Club\n\n1. Without encouraging any further contact between LIREALM-1 and the Soviets but simply taking advantage of the fact that he does continue to see them, I would appreciate continuing information on the following points:\n\n   a. Anything new learned about the activities of LOGINOV and CHERNISH, even the fact that they were at the club for certain hours on certain dates, with whom they played tennis or talked, etc.\n\n   b. Any indications that either LOGINOV or CHERNISH have any interest in anyone at the club.\n\n   c. Continuing assessment and biographic data on Gloria PINTO and her husband with the view of approaching both or either.\n\n2. I would also appreciate a detailed assessment of LOGINOV based on the relationship to date. The same for CHERNISH.\n\n3. As KGB officers both are of priority interest.\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT : BEAVER (P-8777)\n\nDATE OF MEETING : 22 January 1969\n\n1. Following a phone call from Subject, I met him at his hotel room for lunch. The meeting lasted from 1435 until around 1600. The next meeting will be arranged by phone when Subject is back in Mexico City.\n\n2. During the past month, Subject was ill with flu and following recovery, spent all of his time on business matters rather than on subjects of operational interest. As usual, he is up to his ears in financial woes, though he just discovered that his position is not nearly as bad as he thought.\n\n3. Subject said he thinks Polish Ambassador MAJORZAK may come to visit him in Cuernavaca this Sunday, though plans are not definite. I urged him again to get busy courting MAJ. a bit more aggressively and not to let the relationship grow cold. Subject said that the reason he has not been more active lately is that Lolita is in the early months of pregnancy and has not been feeling up to any large-scale entertaining.\n\n4. Yesterday afternoon, 21 January, Subject ran into Valentin LOGINOV at Florencia and Hamburgo. They exchanged brief greetings and LOGINOV commented \"We have had a very good beginning of the year.\" (whatever that means).\n\n5. Subject recently received a post card from BENZEP advising that BENZEP has seen Subject's sister in Warsaw. Nothing more than this other than routine greetings.\n\n6. Subject said that his secretary has been looking for an\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE FILE\n\n10 JANUARY 1968\n\nSUBJECT: Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (P-11712)\n\nOn 16 December 1968 LICALLA reported that a light-complexioned woman had entered the Soviet Embassy grounds at 1106 that day. She was seen exiting at 1122 hours. While inside the Soviet Embassy grounds, this woman had contact with Subject (LOGINOV).\n\nLILYRIC reported that on that same date, 16 December 1968, an unidentified light-complexioned woman had entered the Soviet Embassy at 1106 hours. She was exiting at 1122 hours. She was driving a car with D.F. plates 964 FC. LIKAYAK reported on 7 January 1969 that these plates were registered to:\n\nRaquel URTULER de DALLAL\nResidence: Rio No 95 - 1\nMexico 5, D.F.\n\nThey are registered to a 1965 Opel Sedan.\n\nThere are no Station Traces on the woman cited above. Attached are photographs of the woman seen in contact with LOGINOV, as well as the LIKAYAK plate check results.\n\nGrace H. FARMILANT\n\nYou sure it's not Raquel Welch?\n\nCARDED\nTHIS WOMAN WAS SEEN ENTERING CLUB AT 1105 HOURS. SHE ARRIVED IN A CAR WITH D.F. PLACAS 904 PC (being checked). ACCORDING TO LICALLA, A BLONDE WOMAN WHO WAS SEEN ENTERING AT SAME TIME HAD CONTACT WITH VALENTIN S. LOGINOV (P-11712), KNOWN KGB OFFICER. ACCORDING TO LICALLA THIS WOMAN EXITED AT 1122 HOURS, WHICH IS SAME TIME LILYRIC HAS HER EXITING.\nASUNTO: PLACAS\n\nA quien corresponda\n\nPRESENTE:\n\nSe permite informar el resultado de la investigaci\u00f3n de las placas que enseguida especifico.\n\nPlaca N\u00b0 964-FC-Ferenece a un coche Opel sed\u00e1n particular modelo 1965 motor 112X1652121 con canje de placas en 1963 a nombre de RA\u00daL URTUBAR DE BAILLAL con domicilio en las calles de R\u00edo Poo N\u00b0 95 interior 1 de la zona postal 5, D.F.\nViernes 13\n\nHoy empezaron 6 trabajadores a reparar y pintar algunos salones del interior del Edificio.\n\nHe seguido viendo a 2 mujeres que se encuentran en el club desde el mes de Octubre, estos sujetos entre otras fotos aparecen en las 23, 30 y 31 del Rollos C - 2313.\n\nLunes 16\n\nA las 1100 hs. un Hombre y 2 Mujeres al parecer extranjeros, salieron del club por la roja principal, en el recibidor tuvieron contacto conmigo.\n\nA las 1122 hs. una Mujer rubia y que vest\u00eda de color verde y sali\u00f3 del club por la roja principal, la mujer mencionada entr\u00f3 a las 1106 hs. y en el recibidor tuvo contacto conmigo.\n\nMartes 17\n\nEste d\u00eda en una ocasi\u00f3n de las \"Mujeres Casuales\" salieron varios hombres usados que posiblemente sean para la casa que va habitar el Hombre y su familia.\n\nFirma: [Firma]\n\nFecha: 17 de diciembre de 1948\n\n[Signature]\nCONTACT REPORT:\n\nSUBJECT: LIROBIN/1 and 2\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 4 December 1958\n\n1. The undersigned met with LIROBIN/1 and 2 at the LIROBIN apartment on 4 December from 1215 to 1300 hours. The next meeting will occur when one of the LIROBIN's contacts REIDEMANN via telephone.\n\n2. LIROBIN/2 reported that both of the LIROBINS attended a cocktail party at the home of the Indian Embassy Counselor ( ), FNU PARASHAR, at which they met the LOGINOV's (P-11712). LOGINOV again refused to carry on any of the conversation in English even though English was the common language used by the guests. At one point during the evening, Mrs. PARASHAR addressed LOGINOV in front of all the guests and chided him for not using his English remarking that \"everyone here knows that you speak English\". LOGINOV stared at her icily, but did not comment in either Spanish or English. LOGINOV spoke briefly with L/1 inquiring what L/1's duties were with the newspaper and gave every indication that he was unaware of L/1's column. Mrs. LOGINOV was quite cordial and inquired if L/2 had been to the film festival in Acapulco. L/2 replied that she had not to which Mrs. LOGINOV countered by remarking that she had seen L/2's friends - the SARATOVS (P-13125) - at Acapulco. L/2 stated that no effort was made to involve the LOGINOV's in polemics during the evening and that LOGINOV did not appear to know the majority of the approximate 16 guests who represented almost every nationality. The LIROBIN's were the only Americans with the exception of Edward KENTOY and his Mexican wife. LOGINOV did not spend an inordinate time with any particular individual nor did they remain late.\n\n3. Additional information was obtained re Arnold BILGUN which\n\nREIDEMANN will fashion into a report. The BILGUN's are invited to\ndinner at the LIROBIN's on 6 December together with the BILGUN's and others.\n\nLOGINOV, REIDEMANN\nGloria is a very attractive and vivacious woman of 40 or 45 years. She is the center of gravity of a group of tennis enthusiasts, ranging in age from Koch, Gloria's daughter of 19 or 20 to Licenciado Preciado (a deputy from PAN) of perhaps 65 years or more. It is doubtful that Gloria would encourage an affair with Valentin. Her interest in Val is probably that of everyone else's, as a Soviet, he is a novelty. He is also probably attractive to women who like British men. Gloria, in any case, is married to a very soft-spoken and considerate person.\n\nEXTENT OF SOCIAL CONTACTS. It seems likely that Val and Gloria and their families have come together socially at intervals. It is doubtful that they are intimate friends, but likely that they (the Pintos) are the closest friends that Val has among the Mexicans.\n\nVAL'S INTEREST IN GLORIA. Val's interest in Gloria is probably more complex than her interest in him. First, he probably has entertained the possibility of an affair with Gloria. Val has spoken frequently of his interest in girls. Gloria could easily be a sexual target for Val\u2014self-appointed, of course.\n\nFurther, Gloria organizes tennis groups and informal tournaments. Through her Val is likely to meet a number of Mexicans.\n\nIt seems highly unlikely that Val would try to recruit either Gloria or Pene. They enjoy a fairly luxurious life, Pene being a fairly successful physician. Neither Pene or Gloria take life seriously enough to become intellectual communists. Philosophy is certainly not their reading of choice during idle hours. Gloria is primarily interested in sports. She was national champion of water-skiing several years in a row. Now she is devoting herself to tennis which she plays reasonably well. Dancing is probably her next great interest. In my opinion she does not have sufficient time left to devote to Marxism or economics or politics. She seems particularly ill-informed on about politics.\n\nTHE RETURN. Pene returned from four weeks in Europe last Tuesday, November 26th. Their son, Pepito, travelled with him.\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\n\\[ \\text{\\textcopyright 11712} \\]\n\n\\[ \\text{\\textcopyright 13223} \\]\nA FAVOR FOR OUR NEW CLIENT. It would be very\nhelpful indeed for us to invite the Pintos to dinner. We\nhave maintained contact with them through tennis at least\ntwice a week. There have been occasional dinners among\nourselves.\n\nWe could also invite Valentin with or without the\nPintos. Valentin has done us at least one favor which\nwe have not reciprocated, an invitation to the Moscow\nCircus.\n\nGLORIA'S FEELING ABOUT THE US. I believe that Gloria\nis less anti-American than the average middle-class Mexican.\nShe has travelled to the US many times for vacations and\nshopping. She knows the US rather well, but she does not\nseem pro-US.\n\nRECRUITABILITY OF GLORIA. I am convinced that she\nwould never agree to work for the US. She might consider\nworking for a false-flag \"terrorist\" if she were told\nthat Val has been observed participating in some heinous\natrocities and supplying arms and money to the communist\nstudent activists, for example. Her ultimate objectives\nare not clear in my mind. I doubt that she could ever\nagree to recruit Valentin to defect to Mexico. I am sure\nshe could never recruit him as an agent of Mexico. It\ndoes seem possible that she might be able to get him\nto reveal his disappointments and grievances\u2014information\nwhich might be of value to us.\n\nPINTOS AND II. As of the moment I have insufficient\ninformation about the Pintos to prepare a complete file I\nor II. If it is deemed of interest, we could exchange\ninvitations during the next few weeks in order to obtain\nthe necessary information.\nSUBJECT: MEETING WITH GLORIA PINTO\nDATE OF INFORMATION: December 21, 1968, 1100 hours\nPLACE ACQUIRED: French Club\n\nI saw Gloria talking to Iouri Tchernych. I joined them. Gloria was turning on all of her not inconsiderable charm. Invited Iouri to her posada. Then asked what she should see at the Soviet embassy about a business deal she had, was told this would be Ivanov. Gloria said she knew him and described him as big and corpulent. Apparently this was correct\u2014according to Iouri's reaction.\n\nGloria asked Iouri where he worked and was told with Valentin. He added that this is the department you must come to if you want to visit the Soviet Union.\n\nLater I saw Iouri with his wife and son. She is rather attractive, tall. Pavel, is about three years old, and a very handsome little boy.\n\nDATE OF INFORMATION: December 23, 1968, 2000 - 0200 hours\nPLACE ACQUIRED: Posada at Gloria's\n\nVal and his wife and Iouri and his wife and about 40 to 50 other people were present. Val's wife brought pirojki\u2014delicious.\n\nGloria invited us to spend next weekend with them and 3 or 4 other couples at Val's at Bravo. Valentin and his wife will be there. We accepted.\nGloria Pinto, tennis companion of Valentin LOGINOV.\n\n1. A resume of their relationship. His attitude towards her, hers to him. Any indications of sexual involvement?\n\n2. Bio data on Pinto, marital relations, assessment of her, could she be approached to talk about her relationship with LOGINOV, how, through whom?\n\nDoes LOGINOV still go to French Club? How often. With whom does he associate. In short a report on his current activities\u2014contacts at French Club.\n\nI'll query LIREALM1 on new info 26/11/68.\n\nDon't see LIREALM1 report mid-December 68.\n\nI got photos. No report from LIREALM1.\n\nLIREALM1 has been asked for info again. WP-11712.\n\nWP-11712.\n<Cub>\n\n10/1\n\nHaters on Tony or Antonio\n\nVALERS:\n\nPlease ask LREH for detailed\nfor data assessment and any\nfurther info on contacts with ad\ninterest in 206/1000\n\n[Signature]\n\n11/12\n\n[Marked]\n\nP-11/85\nI. THE REQUEST. For various reasons, I would like to know if there is any information in the files on Tony.\n\nINTEREST IN RUSSIAN. Tony has shown an unusual interest in Valentin Logunov. He recently made a date with Val to play tennis at the French Club. Tony admitted to making quite an effort to keep his date, despite other commitments which had come up. Val, however, did not show and did not call Tony. Tony seemed far more annoyed than would be normal under the circumstances.\n\nTONY'S FATHER, AMERICAN. Tony has a large family here and in the US. His father is an American and Tony speaks excellent English. He is very friendly, well-liked, pro-US, excellent tennis player.\n\nAntonio Valero\n\nP-10712\nSUBJECT: LIROBINS/1 P-11665\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 14 November 1968\n\n1. The undersigned met with LIROBINS/1 at his apartment on 14 November from 1500 to 1630 hours. LIROBINS/2 was ill in bed (flu) and was unable to participate in this meeting. The LIROBINS daughter, Lisa, was present in the house during the meeting which prompted REIDEMANN to inquire of L/1 if the daughter was aware of the type of relationship which the LIROBINS had with REIDEMANN. L/1 replied that \"they\" had told their daughter inasmuch as she had come to suspect such a relationship over the past year or so. REIDEMANN felt that it would be of little purpose, at this time, to admonish the LIROBINS and dropped the subject. REIDEMANN has found the LIROBINS to be woefully lacking in general security principles and has strived, in a tactful manner, to point out past shortcomings and possible security hazards - especially with regard to telephone conversations.\n\n2. In response to REIDEMANN's question regarding attendance at the 7 November reception, L/1 stated that they had both attended. L/1 commented that there appeared fewer people this year than last. As a matter of fact, L/1 could identify only two people in the entire throng that he had previously known. They were: the Indian Embassy Counsellor (?), FNU PARASAR and an American couple, Lulu Vargas-Villa & LEE (wife), who is the correspondent for La Union (Valparaiso); La Prensa (Buenos Aires); El Tiempo (Bogota) and resides at Platon 445 - 2nd floor, Tol: 20-10-23. The LIROBINS spoke briefly with both of the above parties as well as SARATOV (P-13125), SYCHEN (P-11113), LOGIKOV (P-11712) and PARENO (P-2270). The conversation adhered to generalities such as the Olympics, food, etc. L/1 noted that the majority of the guests\nappeared to be Mexicans - a large number of them clad in their everyday clothes. There was also a sprinkling of Mexican student-appearing types. For the record, L/1 reported that his automobile is a 1965 blue, two-door, Oldsmobile bearing Oklahoma license plates, ZS-8546 (1968 plates).\n\n3. With reference to SARATOV's party on the evening of 13 November, L/1 commented that he and L/2 arrived at the party at approximately 2000 remaining until ca. 0030, 14 November. The LIROBBINS were the last to leave although they departed only minutes after the rest of the guests. The guest list included: The LIROBBINS, Arnold Bilgore and wife Joanne, Roger Cudney (Radio VIP) and wife, and the Saratovs. English was the common language spoken and L/1 noted that both the Saratovs handled the language with ease although as the evening progressed and SARATOV's liquor consumption increased his fluency and articulation became more labored. L/1 stated that SARATOV pushed liquor very hard the entire evening starting out with two pre-dinner drinks and then serving vodka in accompaniment to the borsch. Wine was served with the main course, Chinese beef, prepared by Nataliya SARATOVA. Dessert was accompanied with brandy and the evening progressed with long drinks after dinner. L/1 stated that SARATOV drank with the group although L/1 doubted that SARATOV matched the men drink for drink. Mrs. SARATOVA appeared at ease and seemed to enjoy the conversation. L/1 assessed her as a woman who complemented her husband and made a charming and vivacious appearance. L/1 seemed to be struck with SARATOV's apparent \"sincerity\" in his enjoyment of the evening and his \"candor\" in the discussions. For the most part, the conversation edged away from any controversial subjects; seemingly all were content to dwell upon \"Old Mexico\" of 20 years ago and the joys of simple living in the city. During a discussion of the style of night life in Mexico, SARATOV remarked that he enjoyed\na good strip-tense performance now and then relating that he had seen a number of them when he was in the States. SARATOV spoke nostalgically of his life in the States admitting that he missed many aspects of his life there. L/1 remarked that the conversation was largely centered around comments by the BILGORES and L/1 and L/2 inasmuch as the CUDNEYS were very reserved and seldom expressed themselves to any degree. L/1 commented that to the best of his knowledge the CUDNEY's and SARATOV's had first met and the dinner party held by the LIROBBINS. L/1 expressed some surprise in that the CUDNEY's were invited as they are rather shy and inexpressive. Toward the end of the evening, L/1 was able to raise the question of the Soviet invasion of the CSSR. SARATOV staunchly defended the Soviet and Warsaw Pact occupation claiming that it was a necessary move because of the increasing aggressiveness of the West Germans and that the avowed purpose of West German truculence was to put pressure on both the CSSR and East Germany in hopes of reunifying Germany. SARATOV did not become emotional over his defense, but left little doubt that he wholeheartedly approved of the Soviet move into the CSSR. Neither the BILGORE's or the LIROBBINS pursued the issue although L/1 commented to SARATOV that he was not convinced by SARATOV's defense of Soviet actions. In short, L/1 felt that the evening went off smoothly and as the LIROBBINS departed SARATOV walked them down the steps and solicitously inquired of L/1 as to whether they (SARATOV's) had entertained properly and if all had been satisfied with the SARATOV's production. L/1 found this vaguely out of keeping with SARATOV's personality and somewhat gauche. L/1 noted that the SARATOV apartment was modern and well-kept giving every evidence of having been lived in. The SARATOV's possess a large European make combination phono-radio set which was tuned to light FM music for background. SARATOV stated that he had inherited this from his predecessor. SARATOV's one child (age 9) was in bed when the guests arrived. Upon departing, SARATOV inquired of the LIROBBINS if they planned to attend the\nforthcoming Acapulco film festival. L/1 stated that he was not sure if he would journey there and SARATOV stated that he and his wife planned to attend.\n\n4. LIROBBIN/1 stated that during a recent conversation which he had with Stratford JONES (US citizen representing AP in Mexico), JONES commented that he knew both SARATOV and SYCHEV. JONES remarked that he had been to a party at SYCHEV's during the Olympics. Furthermore, JONES related that he knew the KUCHEROV's (TASS) and that Mrs. KUCHEROV had been sent home before the departure of KUCHEROV. JONES strongly implied that security reasons were behind the rather abrupt departure of Mrs. KUCHEROV. L/1 did not press the issue any further.\n\n5. LIROBBIN/1 also reported that the Foreign Press Club is in a chaotic state in that the president, Jose QUIROGA, has accused the club director, Katherine MANJARREZ, of embezzling funds. The truth of the matter, however, seems to be that QUIROGA is engaged in either shady dealing or is guilty of sloppy administration of finances. At any rate, L/1 commented that all members must pay cash for all services and that the club's creditors are pushing for cash payments of all services. The \"scandal\" seems to have shaken the Club and many members are staying away until the financial situation is corrected.\n\n6. The undersigned inquired of L/1 as to whether he knew of any US citizens who might be looking for an apartment. L/1 stated that he was currently unaware of anyone desiring housing but that he would keep his ears open and make a few discreet inquiries without revealing that he knows of any vacancies.\n\n[Signature]\n\nNORRO N. REIDEMANN\nMEMORANDUM FOR: DC/IC/SB\n\nVIA: Chief of Station\n     C/IC\n\nSUBJECT: Consular Corps Visit to Veracruz\n\n1. The undersigned visited Veracruz on 9 and 10 November together with other members of the Consular Corps on an official visit to that city. Although the Cubans were scheduled to attend and official diplomatics proclaiming them guests of the City of Veracruz were prepared, none of them showed up, including Lino SALAZAR Chia, who is stationed in Veracruz. The Czechs, East Germans, and Poles for a number of reasons also failed to go on this trip. Thus, the only Communist representative was Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV, with whom the undersigned had plenty of opportunity to talk. It seems that LOGINOV, at least for public consumption, considers the undersigned \"his friend.\" LOGINOV was accompanied by his wife.\n\n2. The following were the main points of interest discussed by LOGINOV:\n\n   a. The Soviet appeared very anxious to get the undersigned's opinion on a subject to which he kept going back time and again during the visit: the position of the Richard M. NIXON administration vis-a-vis Communist China. Specifically, what LOGINOV wanted to know was what the chances are that the NIXON administration might attempt to bring about a rapprochement between Communist China and the United States. LOGINOV approached this topic from various directions, and the undersigned had the distinct impression that he had received a specific query on this subject. At one point, LOGINOV stressed the importance of Communist China to his country, indicating that his government is becoming increasingly concerned with developments there.\nb. Connected with the above was LOGINOV's concern for peace in Vietnam. For the first time that the undersigned can remember, a Soviet stated that the United States and his country had \"a common interest of utmost importance\" in bringing peace to Vietnam. That the Soviet interest may be connected with their concern about Communist China was indicated by LOGINOV when the latter indicated that peace should be obtained in Vietnam as a way to keep out the Chinese Communists. This did not prevent LOGINOV from making the usual noises in favor of the National Liberation Front and the Vietcong, blasting away at South Vietnamese militarism.\n\nc. While talking about the Middle East, LOGINOV said that the Soviet Union was in the Mediterranean to stay and fully intended to give such support to the Arab nations in that area as to someday \"get rid of Israel.\" LOGINOV specifically stated, \"The Jews have it coming to them, and the day of reckoning is coming.\" The undersigned was curious to know whether this was prompted on LOGINOV's part by a dislike of the Israelis or an anti-Semitic feeling. LOGINOV was quite blunt and categorically stated that he for one \"hated all Jews,\" and did not hide his profound anti-Semitism. LOGINOV added that Jews are parasites who have little nationalism other than that generated by the Zionist cause. He implied that those Jews left in the Soviet Union are foreigners who have done little to help the Soviet cause. The undersigned pointed out that anti-Semitism has been a long Russian tradition, dating back to before the Revolution, and deplored this obvious discrimination. He added that this reminded him of the anti-Semitism of the party which not so long ago made mass murder of Jews a matter of national policy.\n\nd. It took LOGINOV about one day to bring up the Sucesos para Todos article. The undersigned jokingly asked him whether this was a Soviet or Cuban sponsored joke, saying that rumor had it that Sucesos was financed by both the Soviets and the\nCubans. LOGINOV denied this, saying that the staff of Sucesos could not be put by any stretch of the imagination into the category of \"Communists.\" He then point-blank asked the undersigned whether he belonged to the organization mentioned in the article. The undersigned laughingly answered that if such trashy publications as Sucesos were believed by anyone \"of course he belonged to that organization.\" LOGINOV laughed and made a few more noises about how Sucesos obtained the undersigned's name. The latter replied that his name was probably selected at random from stolen pages of the Embassy directory or other such document. He added that if LOGINOV had wanted his phone number he would have been glad to have given it to him rather than see it appear in Sucesos.\n\ne. The discussion the undersigned had with LOGINOV in Guadalajara about the KGB was apparently not forgotten by the Soviet, for the latter pulled out of his purse a copy of the stamp commemorating some KGB anniversary that the undersigned had mentioned to him. The undersigned has no idea of the reasons for this gesture. One of the topics which seems to embarrass LOGINOV the most is the number of visas he signs at the Soviet Embassy. Whenever LOGINOV gets a little too pointed in his provocations, the undersigned raises this subject, with LOGINOV invariably giving a little laugh and no answer.\n\nf. LOGINOV indicated that he was aware that the undersigned had met with Jiri SVESTKA at the time of the Soviet intervention in Czechoslovakia and asked for his opinion of SVESTKA. The undersigned made no bones about the fact that he had a long lunch with the Czech. He said he had found him to be \"muy de la izquierda,\" adding that unfortunately SVESTKA belonged to the very small minority of his country which had welcomed Soviet intervention. The undersigned predicted that the Soviets would have considerable trouble with Czechoslovakia and pointed out that this serious error had tarnished the cause.\nof the Soviet Union. He said, for example, that the Soviet intervention was very unpopular in Mexico. This seemed to draw a little blood from LOGINOV, as he abruptly interrupted the undersigned and asked, \"Where is it popular?\"\n\nRaymond A. FRADYER\n\nDistribution:\n- Orig - 7 (Consular Corps)\n  1 - P-11712 (LOGINOV)\n  1 - P-7111 (SYESTKA)\n\nRAF:Imp\nSUBJECT: LIROBINS/1 and 2.\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 15 October 1965\n\n1. The undersigned met with LIROBINS/1 and 2 at their apartment on 15 October from 1600 to 1730 hours. The LIROBINS were informed that REIDMANN would be out of the country for the next two weeks and, accordingly, were requested to contact C. should they obtain information which they deem perishable and of urgency. The ROBINS will contact C. either at MEX or at home via telephone. A supplementary report on the activities of Pearl GONZALEZ is attached to this Contact Report as a Memorandum for the Record (separate).\n\n2. LIROBIN/2 reported that on 2 October Aleksandr FRIKHOF (P-2270) delivered an invitation to the LIROBINS to attend a reception at the Soviet Embassy for the Soviet Olympic team. FRIKHOF did not come in and visit with the LIROBINS but merely made out an invitation for the LIROBINS to attend. Both the LIROBINS attended the function arriving at approximately 1930 and departing about 2130. The reception was rather poorly organized and there were few people in attendance from the Mexico City community. The LIROBINS stated that they were the only American journalists and recognized no other guests with the exception of a Mexican movie star/director, Amillo FERNANDEZ (\"El Indio\") and wife. During the reception, LIROBIN/2 saw SARIKOV (P-15125) who approached the LIROBINS and apologized for the fact that he had not been able to hold his party. SARIKOV said that he had been extremely busy with the Olympics which occasioned him to go out to the airport every day as well as doing the work of others who he implied had been shirking their duties. SARIKOV repeated his regret that he had not been able to organize the promised party, but assured the LIROBINS that as soon as the Olympics were over\nhe would invite the LINGOINS (and others) to a special party. The LINGOINS noted that SHENY (P-11113) was not in attendance at this reception. The LINGOINS also passed a few light remarks with LOGINOV (P-11712) regarding the forthcoming reception and the Olympics. L/1 noted that LOGINOV spoke to them in fluent English although he had previously denied to L/1 and L/2 that he spoke or understood English.\n\n[Signature]\n\nKONROB N. KHEIDMAIN\n\nAttached letter second army survey\n\nBy L/2 12/13/19\nMr. Loyd Rosenfield\nSIDELINES\nBaldwin, N.Y.\nMexico, D.F.\n\nDear Loyd Rosenfield of the SIDELINES Dept.;\n\nMy father was a government official in Greece -\nWe are now here in Mexico. We know for sure that the\nC.I.A. of the United States engineered the military take-over\nof the Greek government and the erection of the present\npolice state that exists there.\n\nIn Peru, I suspect a similar course of events has\ntaken place.\n\nWe would like to stay here in Mexico: Do you think that\nthe militarists of Mexico are planning to take over the\ngovernment of Mexico? Doesn't it make sense that if\nthe militarists are able to create a state of civil\ndisorder that they will be granted more power, to the\nextent that they will become the acting government of\nMexico, like the governments which have recently come\ninto being in Greece and Peru? Couldn't the terrorist\ngroups like the \"Murro\" and the so-called \"Communists\"\nbe in actuality employees of the militarist institutions\nof this country whose purpose it is to frustrate a\nsituation which only the military-police state could\ncontrol?\n\nAnd lastly, I know you have no way of responding to this\nlast question but I will ask it anyway: Don't you think\nthat the American C.I.A. is at least as influential here\nin Mexico and Latin America as it has been in my country?\n\nRespectfully yours,\nLILYRIC (Y-2844) 24 Sept 68 - Two unidentified Mexicans entered the Soviet Embassy at 1025. They were seen talking to LOGINOV, and left at 1038.\nSOURCE: LILYRIC\n\nDATE: 24 Sept 1968\n\ntwo Mexicans met with Valentin Loginoa at 10:38\n17 September 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Telecon with LICOZY-5 on 12 September 1968\n\n1. LICOZY-5 reported that Henryk SOBIESKI recently called him and identified himself as the replacement for Jan JAKOWIEC. He said that JAKOWIEC will leave in about a month, as soon as the Olympics are completed. He also invited LICOZY-5 for lunch on 17 September stating that he had greetings from an old friend. I told LICOZY-5 to listen to what SOBIESKI says but to turn him down flat, if a pitch is attempted.\n\n2. LICOZY-5 also reported that BAKULIN and his wife left on 10 September with the daughters of KAZANTSKEV, LOGINOV and DYAKONOV (confirmed by LICALLA).\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Stamp: Copies Made]\n21 August 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Soviet Travel\nSOURCE: LICOZY-5\n\nOn 21 August 1968 Subject reported that he has made reservations for the following air travel from Mexico to the USSR for 10 September 1968:\n\na. Valentin and Vera BAKULIN (P-6059). Source does not know if this is PCS or TDY.\n\nb. The daughter of Valentin LOGINOV (P-11712). She is 16 years old and is returning to the USSR after spending the summer with her parents.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nFiles:\nP-2712 P-6059 P-11712\nSUBJECT: Julio PLATAS Urbina, born 10 October 1941 in Empalme, Sonora\n\n1. It has come to our attention that Julio PLATAS Urbina, an agent of the Soviet KGB, is presently living in Bacobampo, Sonora. PLATAS has been known to us since 1961, when he was in contact with Alexander BROVKEV, a KGB officer who was then and still is attached to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City as a Third Secretary. In 1965, PLATAS was in contact with Valentin LOGINOV, a KGB officer who is a Third Secretary and Consul of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico.\n\n2. The exact nature of PLATAS's KGB assignments is unknown to us, but he is believed to be a courier, carrying both money and drugs in behalf of the KGB. His courier duties are also believed to have brought him in contact with the Communist Party of Mexico.\n\n3. PLATAS is believed to have traveled considerably throughout Latin America, and is known to have been in Argentina and Great Britain in 1967. According to our information, he has just received a new assignment, a courier mission which may begin as early as 1 August 1968.\n\n4. We would appreciate receiving the results of your interrogation of PLATAS particularly since he is alleged to have knowledge of Soviet attempts to recruit personnel of the U.S. Embassy in Mexico.\n\nV.P. RIZZUTO: wgp (26 July 1968)\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - LITEMPO-8\n1 - P-6948\n1 - P-1890\nA - P-11712\n\n1-5-6 6-7-12\nUna Recepci\u00f3n de Valent\u00edn Loguinov\n\nEl se\u00f1or Valent\u00edn S. Loguinov, jefe de la secci\u00f3n consular de la embajada de la URSS, y su esposa Alexandra D. de Loguinov, ofrecieron una elegante recepci\u00f3n el mi\u00e9rcoles por la noche en la embajada rusa. La reuni\u00f3n fue en honor de un grupo de amistades y miembros del cuerpo consular, del que el se\u00f1or Loguinov es socio activo e integrante de la mesa directiva. Tambi\u00e9n para darle la bienvenida a su hija, joven de 15 a\u00f1os, quien acaba de llegar procedente de Rusia para disfrutar de una temporada de vacaciones en nuestro pa\u00eds.\n\nEl se\u00f1or Loguinov hizo la presentaci\u00f3n de varios de los artistas estrellas del Circo Russo, entre ellos el gran mago Emil Kio. Se sirvi\u00f3 un exquisito sashimi con pl\u00e1tanos t\u00edpicos de la cocina rusa, vinos internacionales y el imprescindible vodka.\n\nAsistentes: el licenciado Luis Alba Celada y se\u00f1ora, Antonio Certosino y Ema Soto de Certosino, Francisco Barret y se\u00f1ora, David Wiesley y su esposa Jane, Karl Jacobson y su esposa Maria D. N. Parashar, su esposa Arvindkumar e hijo Rabi, Jut N. S. y Anca, Mar\u00eda Fon...\n8 JULY 1968.\n\nI ran traces on the people mentioned in the LITEMRO report attached. Only identifiable traces were on Higinio GOMEZ (Jr.). These are attached.\n\nFROM\n\nSB/BEANBALL\nRe: CALLE NEBRASKA 160\n\nSource: L/3\nDate: 1 July, 1968\nRef.: Station request, 25 June, last.\n\nAttached, for our retention, is a report on the inhabitants of the Apt. bldg. at captured address.\n\nIndef\n\nValentin Logino\nP. 11712\nPierre Marchand\n\ncc P. 370\ncc 50-6-71/4\nRELACI\u00d3N DE HABITANTES QUE VIVEN EN EL EDIFICIO NO. 160 DE LAS CALLES DE ESPA\u00d1A.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 1.- HENRY C. FLETCHER, D. NACIONALIDAD INGLESA NO TIENE OCUPACI\u00d3N FIJA Y TRABAJA EN LA DEFENSA NACIONAL DONDE ES MUY CONOCIDO, TIENE UN AUTOM\u00d3VIL FORD VIEJO.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 2.- PENDIENTE NO HAY QUIEN DE DATOS.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 3.- SRA. MARIA VIVIENDO EN SU MARIDO TIENE TUCO DE HABER MUERTO Y VIVE SOLA NO TIENE NING\u00daN OCUPACI\u00d3N NI VEH\u00cdCULO.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 4.- ING. JOS\u00c9 BRAVO ORTIZ ESPINOSA, TRABAJA EN LA COMISI\u00d3N NACIONAL DE ENERG\u00cdA NUCLEAR EN EL N. 33 DE LA CARRETERA M\u00c9XICO TOLUCA, TIENE UN AUTOM\u00d3VIL JAGUAR PLACAS 691-EU Y UN VALIANT MODELO 1965 PLACAS 690-EU.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 5.- SRA. RAFAEL GONZ\u00c1LEZ NO HAY QUIEN DE DATOS DE EL.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 6.- LIC. ARTURO LARIOS RODR\u00cdGUEZ TIENE SU DESPACHO EN AVE. 16 DE SEPTIEMBRE NO. 76-401 TIENE UN AUTOM\u00d3VIL PLYMOUTH K MOD 1966.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 7.- HIGINO G\u00d3MEZ SERRANO, DUENIO DE LA CASA DE PUBLICIDAD POL\u00cdTICA, SU ESPOSA NO SABE LA DIRECCI\u00d3N Y NO APARECE EN EL DIRECTORIO TELEF\u00d3NICO TIENE UN AUTOM\u00d3VIL PACKARD MOD 1956.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 8.- JOSE V. URALEY GERENTE DE VENTAS DE LA CIA. GARNER-BERGER, SU ESPOSA NO SABE LA DIRECCI\u00d3N Y TAMBI\u00c9N APARECE EN EL DIRECTORIO TELEF\u00d3NICO TIENE UN AUTOM\u00d3VIL FORD 200.\n\nDEPTO. NO. 9.- SRA. MARSHALL ES MASAJISTA A DOMICILIO NO TIENE AUTOM\u00d3VIL.\n\nFatima Marshall, wife of Jose Marshall\n\n1 de julio de 1968.\nGOMEZ, HIGINIO (Spaniard)\n4-2-0-26\n8-2-3-5 r.3\n\nGOMEZ, Higinio (Jr.)\n\nEmployed by the Weyerhauser Paper Company in Mexico\n\nMEMO\n4 Apr 66\nP 12591\n\nCopy of the memo attached\nThe Consul General\n\nC/PRO - T. Frank Crigler\n\nManuscripts of \"General\" Morton SLOANE\n\nJust after 5:00 PM last Friday, Sr. Higinio G\u00f3mez Jr., previously unknown to me but whose calling card indicates that he is employed by the Weyerhaeuser Paper Company here, brought to the Protection and Welfare Office a blue canvas bag containing two book-length manuscripts. Sr. G\u00f3mez stated that he had found the bag containing the manuscripts in the elevator of the office building in which he works, at Reforma No. 308, opposite the Embassy. He said that he was ignorant as to the identity of their author, as well as who it might have been who had left them in the elevator. He had examined them briefly, he said, and then decided that they ought immediately to be brought to the Embassy.\n\nThe cardboard cover sheets of both manuscripts identified the author as Morton SLOANE, and one of these showed his address to be \"General\" Morton SLOANE, c/o Mr. J. Edgar Hoover, Chief of the F.B.I., 9th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. The books were entitled \"Swords along the Shore,\" and \"Kokotam - Folklore of the Incas.\" A cursory examination of the former revealed a clumsy hate theme, charging minority groups in the United States with selling out to the communists. The latter was apparently a romantic treatment in novel form of Pizarro's conquest of Peru.\n\nAs you are aware, the manuscripts were delivered to you on the same day for storage and subsequent disposition.\n\nC/PRO: Crigler/SH\n\nLIMITED OFFICIAL USE\n\nRECEIVED\n\nCARDED\n\nLIMITED OFFICIAL USE\n\n[Signature]\n\nMORTON SLOANE\n\nP-12571\nFiesta Nacional de Islandia\n\nDavid N. Wiesley, c\u00f3nsul general honorario de la embajada de Islandia y su esposa, Gene Galt de Wiesley ofrecieron una recepci\u00f3n el lunes \u00faltimo, en la residencia del consulado con motivo del aniversario n\u00famero 34 de la independencia de ese pa\u00eds... Islandia se constituy\u00f3 en rep\u00fablica el a\u00f1o de 1914, dejando de ser posesi\u00f3n de Dinamarca a la que hab\u00eda pertenecido desde 1874.\n\nLos invitados esa noche fueron el licenciado Egil Nyegaard, embajador de Noruega y se\u00f1ora; Hans von Haffner, embajador de Dinamarca y se\u00f1ora; Tord Gornasen, embajador de Suecia, y se\u00f1ora; Joaqu\u00edn Hern\u00e1ndez Armas, embajador de Cuba, y se\u00f1ora; Valent\u00edn S. Loguinov y se\u00f1ora; Bok Hyung Lee y se\u00f1ora; Marta Fonseca Guardia de Jim\u00e9nez; Rafael Miranda Fern\u00e1ndez y se\u00f1ora; Thomas Te-Ken Kao y se\u00f1ora.\n\n1. Con el anfitri\u00f3n, se\u00f1or David Wiesley, tercero a la izquierda, Bok Hyung Lee, L.P. Vovnovich, Jiri Svestka y Antonio Cortesino.\n2. Mininali Sarabhai, Rabindranath Parnabhar y Minnal Nahdevma.\n3. Kappo Lee y Zel Rafeston.\n4. Norland.\n5. Patson y Nils Oskar Dietz.\n6. En este grupo Valentin Loguinov, Betty Wiesley, Yuri Charnish y Alexandra de Loguinov.\n\nEl HERALDO\n26 Junio 65\nJulio 02 1971\n25 June 1968\n\nSUBJECT: Nebraska 180\n\nPlease give this address to Mike and ask him to get us the names of the tenants in this building and where they work. It's an apartment building.\n1. I met Subject in his room at the Del Paseo from 1430 to 1615. The next meeting will be arranged by telephone.\n\n2. LOGINOV. Not hearing from LOGINOV after their telephone conversation on 10 May, Subject called him on 30 or 31 May. Subject told LOGINOV he couldn't remember who was supposed to call whom about setting a date for the LOGINOVS' visit to Subject's home, and he just wanted to check to see that they hadn't gotten their signal crossed. LOGINOV said that it wasn't that he was waiting for Subject to call, but simply that a free date hadn't opened up yet. LOGINOV said that it didn't look as though he was going to be able to get to Subject's home for the next couple of weeks, but that he definitely wanted to take Subject up on his invitation and would call him just as soon as he definitely knew he would have a free Saturday or Sunday when he could come.\n\n3. I instructed Subject to leave the initiative for the next contact to LOGINOV.\n\n4. Pedro DALMA. DALMA is the general manager of \"MEXAMA\" in Cuernavaca. The firm deals in citric acid. To the best of Subject's knowledge, DALMA was born in Hungary and came to Mexico about 10 or 15 years ago. He is a member of the \"Industrial Club\" in Cuernavaca, and Subject occasionally meets\n\nCc: P-117/2\nhim there. Subject said that DALMA has tried to be friendly with him for several years and has many times invited Subject and his wife to his home. Subject said he has never liked DALMA, however, and has always found a way out of the invitations. One reason he didn't like DALMA, Subject said, was that he always seemed to have something good to say about Communist Hungary. About nine months ago, DALMA took a trip to Hungary, and whenever Subject has seen him since then, he has made a point of telling Subject how good conditions are in Hungary and how happy everyone is there. Subject said he thought we should therefore have the fellow's name in our files.\n\n5. DESABER'S PERSONAL LIFE. In late March, Subject told me about a woman he had met on a business trip to New York earlier in the month. Her name is Velia SANCHEZ Belmont, Mexican citizen, age approximately 33. Subject happened to sit next to her on the flight to New York, struck up a conversation, and ultimately spent a few nights with her in New York.\n\n6. Subject told me that Velia was once married to an American singer, but had been divorced and subsequently become the mistress of Julian RODRIGUEZ Adame, a former Mexican Secretary of Agriculture (under LOPEZ Mateos) and currently the President of the International Cotton Association. Subject said that through RODRIGUEZ Adame, Velia had gotten to know many of the top people in the PRI and had become particularly friendly with the wife of Alfonso MARTINEZ Dom\u00ednguez, the new head of the PRI. Subject said that Velia had become fairly wealthy as the result of her influential contacts and now owned an apartment\nin New York City, a house in Mexico City, and a second house in Acapulco, where she also had a sizable piece of undeveloped land. Subject described Velia as both extremely intelligent and a tremendous sexual partner, and speculated that because of her excellent political contacts, she might from time to time be able to provide some interesting information on the Mexican political scene.\n\n7. I was in Acapulco on 6 and 7 April, and at Subject's invitation spent the afternoon of 7 April with him and Velia on the beach at the Pierre Marques Hotel. Subject introduced me (by phony name) as a business contact from the States, and I had the opportunity to talk with Velia at intervals throughout the afternoon. As Subject told me, she is attractive, well-built, intelligent, polished, very sharp, and evidently very shrewd. She also speaks very good English. She told me she had just returned two days ago from a shopping trip to New York with the wife of MARTINEZ Dominguez. She said the se\u00f1ora is really just a country woman and had asked her to go with her to New York to help her pick out a new wardrobe, which she needed for her new role as the wife of the leader of the PRI. We later drove to Velia's house for a drink, and from its size and location (overlooking the bay between the zocalo and the Caleta Hotel, it would indeed appear she had a considerable amount of money.\n\n8. On 3 June, Subject told me that his romance with Velia had gotten out of hand, as she was extremely demanding and possessive and wanted him to divorce his wife and marry her. The problem, Subject said, was that he felt just strongly enough\nabout her that he couldn't just dismiss the idea. Moreover, his wife had learned about Velia, and although she was accustomed to Subject's philandering, she recognized that Velia was a little different from Subject's other girl friends and was extremely upset. Subject asked my opinion and advice, and for what it was worth, I told him I thought he was crazy to even think of breaking up his family and his marriage with a woman whom he claimed to still love and who was tolerant to the point that Subject was able to have both her and all the routine extracurricular activity he wanted at the same time. I pointed out that this certainly wouldn't be the case with Velia, who would probably poison him if he even looked at another woman. After batting this around for some time, Subject finally said he agreed with me and that if he couldn't simply keep Velia on the string, he'd have no choice but to drop her. This is hardly to say, however, that this is what Subject will do, and I suspect Velia will continue to disrupt Subject's personal life for some time to come.\n\n9. As for our possible use of Velia\u2014and she does seem to have the credentials to be one of the great female spies\u2014there are clearly two considerations which should be mentioned. First, any attempt to use Subject in her exploitation (at least at this point) would further complicate his relations with her and presumably further disrupt his personal life. Second, based on what I know about her from Subject and from personal contact, I am afraid that if we did succeed in recruiting her for whatever\npurpose, we would sooner or later find that we had a genuine\nMexican tigra by the tail.\n\nSB/A - I agree with\nabove, but you\nmust check with\nRESABER some time to\nsee what has become\nof the Cal. UP Res. 2nd\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LIOVAL-1 P-8903\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 31 May 1968\n\n1. COIGKE and I met with Subject at the Dairy Queen on San Antonio from 1600 to 1635 hours. Subject will call if anything of interest develops during COIGKE's home leave, and I will meet him at the Dairy Queen at the time specified over the phone.\n\n2. Subject said he had a good friend by the name of Donald BRIGGS who was planning to visit him in Mexico for about three weeks beginning the first or second week of June. BRIGGS, according to Subject, teaches Spanish at Florida State and speaks some Russian. Subject said he mentioned BRIGGS's upcoming visit and the fact BRIGGS knows some Russian to VIDIELLA at class on 27 May. VIDIELLA perked up at this and suggested that he, Subject, BRIGGS, and his (VIDIELLA's) good friend Valentin (LOGINOV)\u2014as a group of Russian speakers\u2014all get together for an evening. VIDIELLA suggested that they go to his French girl friend's apartment and have a blast re-late with girls and boose. VIDIELLA then asked if Subject thought BRIGGS would mind if a Soviet Embassy official came along. Subject said he was sure BRIGGS wouldn't mind, and they agreed to make definite plans at a later date.\n\n3. Subject said that VIDIELLA mentioned that his mother had taught Spanish to Valentin in Moscow.\nSECRET\n\n27 May 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: The Record\n\nVIA: Chief, SB\nChief of Station\n\nSUBJECT: Consular Corps Visit to Guadalajara, 17 and 18 May 1968\n\n1. Among the 30 odd members of the Mexico City Consular Association who traveled to Guadalajara for a semi-official visit to that city on 17 and 18 May 1968 were Valentin Serebrovich LOGINOV and Party CHUMINSK, representing the Soviets; Jiri SWESTRA, representing the Czechs; and Enrique GARCIA LABRADA and Lino SALAZAR Chia, representing the Cubans. SALAZAR was a surprise to everybody since he is stationed in Veracruz. It must be said, however, that at least one other representative of the Veracruz Consular Association (a Guatemalan or Dominican) also traveled with the group. Travel to and from Guadalajara was by train, giving ample opportunity for a variety of conversations. The undersigned also found himself seated on several occasions next to the Soviets and the Cubans, with whom he also conversed while visiting points of interest listed in the official program of the visit.\n\n2. CICARD certainly made an effort to be as sociable as possible in his dealings with the undersigned. By the end of the visit, as a matter of fact, and in spite of several rather pointed discussions, CICARD appeared to have become the undersigned's good friend, walking about with his arm around the undersigned's shoulder and calling him by his first name. The undersigned found CICARD far more reasonable than his colleague, SALAZAR, and he learned that he could have a fairly frank discussion with him without CICARD's showing irritation or anger. This was important since on several occasions the undersigned made the Soviets laugh at the expense of the Cubans. While on an official visit to the Guadalajara cathedral, in a receiving room adjacent to the cathedral the undersigned asked CICARD what his religion was. CICARD said he was a Communist. The undersigned then pointed out that for a Communist country, Cuba certainly got along splendidly.\nwith the Vatican, to the point where it had an Ambassador to the Vatican and had celebrated some months ago some distinction accorded by the Pope to the Papal Nuncio in Havana by lighting up the churches at government expense. CICARD readily admitted that there were many \"good Communists\" in Cuba who were also good Catholics, even, he said, among people fairly high up in the government. He, CICARD, was a dedicated revolutionary, however, who did not give any part of his loyalty to the regime to any type of religion. CICARD went on to emphasize that the close CASTRO relations with the Vatican were a demonstration of the democratic nature of Fidel's regime. On several instances the undersigned joked about Raul CASTRO's recent speech which brought about the nationalization of every last small enterprise and further rationing in Cuba of such things as beer and soft drinks. On one occasion he also told CICARD that the latter's country was at the end of its rope economically, with hard currency reserves at an all-time low since the CASTRO revolution. CICARD agreed that the \"economic situation of his country was bad,\" particularly as far as hard currency reserves were concerned. He naturally attributed this in part to the so-called American blockade and in other part to the efforts that had previously been made by the government to buy as much machinery as possible to go on with its plan of industrial expansion. When the undersigned mentioned shortages of meat, fruit, et cetera, CICARD readily admitted these were being sold to purchase badly needed equipment. As far as the sugar crop was concerned, he also admitted that the one of this year would not match that of last year, but he would not agree that it would not go over 5,000,000 tons. He and his colleague, however, repeated time and again that they were convinced, as Fidel has promised them, that by 1970 Cuba would have a 10,000,000 ton harvest of sugar. As a matter of fact, the date 1970 came up in the conversation about other matters, as if that date were that from which Cuba would have no more economic problems. Someone in the group mentioned to CICARD that there had been rumors in the press of rapprochement between Cuba and the United States. CICARD said he did not think so because, he said, relations between the two countries were at present \"very bad.\" The undersigned jokingly asked CICARD about Cyrus Eaton's visit and the purpose of it. All CICARD could say was that Eaton had a meeting with Fidel (photographs of Eaton and CASTRO appeared in the local newspapers). As to the reason for the trip, CICARD rather\nsarcastically pointed out that that was up to the Ministry of Information and claimed to know nothing about it. On the return trip to Mexico City CICARD broached the topic of the eight beatniks who had recently been arrested by the Mexican police as they were about to board the plane for Cuba and deported to the United States. The undersigned kept a straight face throughout this and told him he knew nothing about it. CICARD protested that news of the arrests and deportation had reached the press. The undersigned told him that he had seen nothing of the sort. CICARD then went on to blame the incident on the American Embassy, which, he said, was behind the arrests and deportation. The undersigned pointed out that the Embassy had other things to do than to concern itself with, according to CICARD's own description, beatnik-type students. This was, in any case, a Mexican matter and it was not surprising that the people were arrested and deported, as the Mexicans had arrested and deported many other beatniks of all nationalities. During a rather heated exchange the previous night in which Yuri S. CHERNYSH and Ji\u0159\u00ed SV\u011aSTKA were also present, CICARD boasted that Puerto Rico would soon find its freedom. The undersigned really opened up on him and blandly told him that the United States had held a referendum in Puerto Rico, during which it had offered statehood or independence, but the Puerto Ricans preferred to maintain the status which they now enjoy with the United States. He also told CICARD that the two or three bombs that had blown up on the island in recent months and were no doubt the work of the Cubans were probably one of the worst pieces of stupidity that the regime had committed. The undersigned went on to blast CICARD in front of his Communist friends for the policy of aggression pursued by Cuba in Latin America, even against the advice of the Soviets and other foreign Communists. He said he could not imagine how Cuba could continue with such a program after the rout it suffered in Bolivia and Peru. CHERNYSH and SV\u011aSTKA, who were listening to this, remained silent during this exchange. CICARD, with a sarcastic laugh, said that Bolivia and Peru were one thing, but what about Colombia, Venezuela, and Guatemala? The undersigned told him that these so-called revolutionary movements had badly suffered in the last few months. The control the Cubans claimed to exercise over these movements was also doubtful, as some of these movements had openly criticized the Cubans. The previous day during a visit\nto the Center for International Friendship in Guadalajara, CICARD also boasted of the moral necessity for the Cubans to help free Latin Americans from the drudge of misery and oppression. When the undersigned jokingly asked whether this included Mexico, CICARD said that the Cubans had to watch themselves in that country and would do nothing there. The undersigned, by way of conclusion, warned him that any effort in Mexico was doomed, as the Cubans would get nowhere in that country even if they tried. At another point of the visit both CICARD and SALAZAR denied vehemently that Cuba had supported any opposition movement in Mexico or that it had backed guerrilla movements in Guerrero and elsewhere. Both CICARD and SALAZAR several times joked in the presence of their Soviet friends that any American aggression against Cuba would probably mean Russian reprisals against the United States, but that Cuba in any case was ready for any alternative.\n\nWhile at the Hilton Hotel, where the group stayed in Guadalajara, the undersigned, who was looking out a window overlooking the garden in the back of the hotel where the pool is, spotted CICARD, SALAZAR, and CHERNYSH late on the evening of 18 May, just prior to leaving for the railroad station, engaged in an animated conversation. While CICARD looked over his shoulder, SALAZAR scribbled something on the paper which he handed CHERNYSH. The same day, about half an hour before going to the Station, Reynaldo CEPEDA Hernandez and his wife arrived at the Hilton, where they were eventually introduced to the undersigned by CICARD as \"our First Secretary.\" The undersigned later asked CICARD what CEPEDA was doing there since he was not part of the group and since the Cubans have no consulate in Guadalajara. With a broad smile CICARD said he was on \"vacation.\" At one point of the visit, the bus used by the group left without the undersigned, the Cubans, and the representative of Ecuador and his wife. It was agreed to proceed to the banquet which was to be held at Chapala, some 57 kilometers away, by taxi, if the taxi could not first locate the bus in the city. The bus was not located, and the little group proceeded to Chapala, where to the undersigned's amazement CICARD paid for the entire taxi trip and refused money from the others.\n\n3. Lino SALAZAR is undoubtedly one of the most uncouth, vulgar, and all-around uneducated men the undersigned has ever met. A light mulatto, SALAZAR speaks with such a heavy\nSECRET\n\n-5-\n\nNegro-type accent that it is almost impossible to understand him. As a matter of fact, both LOGINOV and CHERNISH told the undersigned that the latter seemed to understand SALAZAR far better than they did. At every possible moment he could squeeze in some Communist propaganda SALAZAR threw in a CASTROist tirade, whether it was relevant to the conversation and the moment or not. He tried to embarrass the wife of the South Korean representative who was with the group by asking her whether every Korean woman had a wart over her lip as she did. Fortunately, the wife of the Korean representative speaks very little Spanish and hardly any English, and the undersigned just would not translate. He also, in her presence, launched into a tirade about South Korea, which the undersigned cut off by telling him that he did not know what he was talking about and that North Korea was the bottom of the barrel as far as nations were concerned. SALAZAR said that in Veracruz the Americans avoided him, but that this was all right with him since he had no business with them. He boasted that he was at the battle of the Bay of Pigs, which, he said, was one of the most tremendous battles of modern times. Since the Russians were listening to this the undersigned turned towards them and asked how many men had died in Stalingrad. LOGINOV said about a million and a half. The undersigned then turned to SALAZAR to say that if a thousand men had been hurt at the Bay of Pigs he would be very surprised. Both SALAZAR and CICARD on several occasions blasted Cuban exiles in the United States, saying that they were men without honor and social responsibility who were afraid to work. The undersigned maintained that on the contrary the exiles, who arrived without a dime, had given a very good accounting of themselves in the work department, as most of them had started new and successful commercial enterprises in the United States. SALAZAR and CICARD said this might be so, but that in any case they had no courage, as if they did not agree with the CASTRO regime they should be in Cuba fighting it. SALAZAR has the manners of an arrogant dog, whistles at the table during dinner, uses obscene language in front of ladies, and, as pointed out above, never fails to give out with strong \"patria o muerto\" music. During the banquet at Chapala on 18 May SALAZAR, who had come with an expensive camera as did CICARD, took pictures of each member of the group so obviously that the undersigned walked up to him and asked him if he did not want his signature as well, to the great amusement of the Soviets who overheard\nSECRET\n\n4. There was no doubt from LOGINOV's statements to the undersigned that the Soviet had made at least some mental notes before he went on the trip about subjects he should raise with the undersigned. Vietnam, of course, was profusely discussed, but LOGINOV also wanted to know about the state of the election campaigns in the United States and about the March of the Poor on Washington. One afternoon that LOGINOV was with CHERNYSHEV, the undersigned told him that he could not imagine how the Soviets could favor the candidacy of Bobby KENNEDY, an aristocrat and millionaire who had never worked with his hands and was liberally spending the family fortune to influence people's minds, when Hubert HUMPHREY, for example, was far more to the left in the American political spectrum and obviously had the support of the labor unions. No matter what the undersigned said, the Soviets found something good to say about KENNEDY, who appears to be the candidate the Soviet Union would most like to see as the next President. The two Soviets laughingly remarked that the undersigned's apparent dislike for KENNEDY might one day cost him his job. The undersigned said that fortunately the American Government was not at the mercy of the prevailing winds as were the governments of \"other countries.\" The manner in which LOGINOV went about collecting his \"information\" was interesting and amusing. For example, on the way to Guadalajara, when the undersigned and LOGINOV were alone in the corridor of their coach, LOGINOV mentioned the armistice negotiations in Vietnam. The undersigned, as he has done many times in the past, emphasized that this opportunity to find an adequate peace should not be thrown away, as a breakdown in negotiations might increase the tempo of the war to the point where a much larger conflict could result. LOGINOV agreed that no one, including his country, wanted such a conflict and indeed a maximum effort should be made to find peace in Vietnam. The undersigned reiterated that much depended on the Soviets, as the latter obviously had some influence over the North Vietnamese Government. He then said that peace was possible providing that\ntwo main conditions were met. At that point someone came by and interrupted the conversation for a good two or three minutes. Rather than renew the argument he could see LOGINOV wanted to develop, the undersigned started to talk about the cattle in the fields, Mexican agriculture, et cetera. LOGINOV listened to this for one or two minutes and then reminded the undersigned he had said something about conditions for the peasants. The undersigned said that the primary condition for peace was for North Vietnam to pull out all of its troops from South Vietnam. Before he could mention the second condition, someone again interrupted the conversation, handed the undersigned and LOGINOV drinks, and remained for a good five minutes. After his departure, the undersigned again talked about something else, but again LOGINOV, after one or two minutes, doggedly went back to the original discussion and wanted to know what the second condition was. The undersigned then told him that this condition was that really free elections be held in South Vietnam. About half an hour later, LOGINOV opened up on the March of the Poor, whereupon the undersigned referred him to a recent article in the U.S. News and World Report listing the salaries of various workers in the United States. Electricians, for example, are listed as making $7.50 an hour. In short, the undersigned pointed out, to be really poor in the United States takes a lot of doing, or rather, a lack of doing. He said he wished the United States could do as the Soviets do and send people without a desire to work or the will to assume responsibility to re-education camps in Siberia and elsewhere. LOGINOV confirmed, in fact, that that was what the Soviet government was doing. LOGINOV also touched upon the search for the assassin of Martin Luther KING, whereupon the undersigned told him that the United States lacked the regimentation of the Soviet Union and the heavy state controls over the population so that it was difficult at times to find a man in that nation of more than 200,000,000 people in one or two days. He also told LOGINOV that it remained to be seen who put the assassin up to his act. The undersigned, of course, mentioned that the assassination was an abominable deed, as KING was probably the most reasonable of the black leaders. He said that had the white extremists, as LOGINOV called them, been behind the assassination, it is probable that Stokely CARMICHAEL or Rap BROWN would have been shot. During the ride on the bus and out of the clear blue, LOGINOV asked the undersigned\nwhether he had met J. Edgar Hoover. The undersigned said he had not. LOGINOV then said that he was a bachelor. The undersigned said that if he was it was probably because in his 40 years as head of the FBI he had had an awfully lot to do. The undersigned then pointed out that the FBI was a thoroughly respected organization in the United States which had the support of the people. LOGINOV then switched to the CIA, but the undersigned told him that unlike the FBI, on which quite a bit was known to the American people, very little filtered out about the CIA. LOGINOV made one more crack about the periodic changes at the helm of the CIA and dropped the subject. A somewhat similar conversation occurred a little later between the undersigned, LOGINOV, and CHERNYSH when unexpectedly LOGINOV mentioned something about the KGB and its dedication to the protection of the Soviet people and the Constitution. The undersigned asked LOGINOV for a sample of the stamp commemorating the 50th anniversary of the KGB. Neither CHERNYSH nor LOGINOV seemed to know that such a stamp existed but launched into praise of the service which assured the protection of the Soviet people with such a light hand. The undersigned returned that the KGB was an organization with a terrible reputation overseas, where, contrary to what the Soviets had just told him, they appeared to maintain numerous stations. LOGINOV then pointed out that the United States police did not have a light hand and, as he put it, cracked heads any time they had a chance. The undersigned said that, on the contrary, when a firm hand had to be used, the police had a very bad time of it during everyday life, as recent decisions of the Supreme Court made law enforcement a very difficult business because of the emphasis given by the Court to the respect and protection of human rights. Surprisingly enough, neither the Soviets, nor the Czechs, nor the Cubans had much to say about recent race riots in the United States other than to confirm for themselves that quite a bit of damage had been done. The undersigned had the opportunity to talk to LOGINOV alone about the recent speech of Fidel CASTRO and the following nationalization of businesses and restrictions imposed on the Cuban people. LOGINOV, who, incidentally, made no bones about the fact that his country is much opposed to CASTRO's policy of expansion of terrorist activities in Latin America, said that the complete nationalization of private business in Cuba was an action with which he \"did not agree.\" He said that the Cuban Communist state\nwas a young one and on occasion claimed to know more than those who have been purifying Communism for 50 years and more. The undersigned joked about the fact that the Soviet Union would have to give the Cubans petroleum free if the sugar crop this year was as bad as it appeared to be. LOGINOV had a good chuckle over this but did not comment.\n\n3. The undersigned, who has already had the feeling that Jiri SVESTKA apes the Soviets, copies their line, and mimics their comportment, had confirmation of all this during the trip. SVESTKA was one of the first to raise the topic of Vietnam and pour oil over the fire. During dinner in the dining car on the way to Guadalajara, where he sat with the undersigned and the two Soviets, the topic of the Red army came up. The undersigned, who had previously told the Russians that he served for a brief time with that army, said that he had great admiration for the military feats of the Russians. This led SVESTKA to say that the Red army was never beaten. The undersigned then gave SVESTKA a short refresher course in what had happened in Warsaw in 1920 or 1921, when a Franco-Prussian army led by Gen. Maxime WEGAND and Gen. Jozef PILSUDSKI beat an invading Soviet army, which had, among other things, Joseph STALIN as its commissar. SVESTKA tried to dispute the fact that this took place, whereupon the undersigned offered to buy him a history book. That seemed to prevent SVESTKA from making any other expeditions into history during the remainder of the trip. Most of the discussions with the Czech, Soviets, and Cubans were on extremely friendly terms, in spite of their pointedness at times. During the night of 18 May, during the train trip back to Mexico City, a particularly heated discussion took place in a compartment where CHERNYSH, SVESTKA, and CICAK were present. This discussion will be reviewed in the next paragraph. Suffice it to say that at one point SVESTKA intervened in the defense of CHERNYSH to say something about how indebted Czechoslovakia was to the Soviets. The undersigned then told him that if it had not been the decision of President Franklin D. ROOSEVELT, at the urging, apparently, of STALIN, to stop the advance of the United States army into Czechoslovakia to allow the Russians to liberate Prague, the armistice would not have been signed. Soviet troops occupying Czechoslovakia, and \"things might have been completely different for the Czech nation.\" When SVESTKA claimed to be bewildered by this statement, the\nundorsigned even more blindly asked him if he meant to say that Czechoslovakia would have become a Communist power had the Soviet armies not occupied the country by the end of the war. SVESTKA said that there was no doubt about this, that the coming of the Communist regime in Czechoslovakia had been inevitable because of the historical and social background of the Czechs. The undersigned expressed horror at a statement like this, which did not take into consideration the fact that such anti-Communists as Jan MASARYK and Eduard BENES were the fathers of the Czech state. SVESTKA then went on to say that indeed neither MASARYK nor BENES had been Communist, but that neither had any deep knowledge of the inborn desires of the Czech people. The undersigned told him that this was enough to make both MASARYK and BENES turn over in their graves. He pointed out that there had been a violent exchange, according to the Mexican press, between the Czech and Soviet papers over MASARYK, with the Russians saying that MASARYK had participated in an attempt to kill Nikolai LENIN. CHERNYSH said that this was a pack of lies, that he had reviewed the Soviet press for that period and found nothing about MASARYK. This was quickly endorsed by SVESTKA. When the undersigned once more stated his belief that people who had known better would take the first opportunity to overthrow Communism, both CHERNYSH and SVESTKA started speaking at the same time. The undersigned pointed out that the Russian people had never known anything other than a curb on personal freedom and very strong central government, but the Czechs, the Poles, the Hungarians, and others had known differently. Such people were thirsty for personal freedoms and direct control over their destiny. When CHERNYSH said he doubted this, the undersigned reminded him that it was Russian tanks that had crushed the students and workers' revolt in Hungary in 1956. He also pointed to the recent quiet but radical revolution which had taken place in Czechoslovakia, saying that, for example, the day after the right to strike had been re-established practically all workers struck to protest 20 years of mismanagement, poor housing, and lack of freedom. From that point on SVESTKA remained silent, apparently having been shaken up. The undersigned allowed himself to think that in several years at least the Czechs, like the Romanians before them, would be governing themselves without having first to check with Moscow. This discussion ended about 1:30 in the morning. At 9:00 the undersigned saw LOGINOV, with whom he had a chat about various\nthings. He inquired about SVESTKA. LOGINOV said he had briefly seen him on his way to the dining car, but commented that SVESTKA looked mighty unhappy about something. It was obvious to the undersigned that, as mentioned above, the previous night's discussion had really shaken up the Czech, who was worrying about how things would turn out in Czechoslovakia and about his future. SVESTKA, as a matter of fact, mentioned to the undersigned when he saw him a few minutes later that he had felt that part of the previous night's discussion had been conducted in what he phrased as a rather cool atmosphere. This feeling was obviously not shared by CHERNYSH, despite the heat of the discussion, who warmly greeted the undersigned the next morning, and unless the undersigned is very much mistaken, appeared to have a sort of liking for him.\n\n3. The undersigned finds CHERNYSH a fairly easy man to talk to. Not that CHERNYSH is not a dedicated Communist, but he seems to enjoy a good discussion, probably because he finds this a good opportunity to pass on typical Communist views. Before the discussion the night of 10 May mentioned above, during which CHERNYSH was one of the main participants, the Ukrainian and the undersigned had previously discussed such things as Western-style elections and the right to strike. On both topics CHERNYSH obviously was not on the same wave length as the undersigned. He appeared to believe his statements to the effect that a strike was unnecessary in a society dedicated to the well-being of the workers. It would only cripple an economy struggling hard to meet local demands. On the subject of elections CHERNYSH was even further away from the Western view. He pointed out that some Americans, and perhaps the undersigned, did not have any particular liking for any of the candidates for presidential elections. This made the element of choice a very marginal benefit, if benefit it was. The picking of a president and a political leader inside the government where these men could be thoroughly tested and screened was a much better prospect. The undersigned naturally explained at length that, according to the old cliche, \"variety is the spice of life,\" and that choice is a born right. The undersigned said that he would never be able to live in a place where he could not pick his close friends, his family companions, or the people scheduled to represent him in the republic. That seemed to make no dent\nin all of CHERNYSH's arguments. The undersigned scored a little more during the previously mentioned discussion during the night of 18 May. He then had a better chance to compare the American Constitution with the Soviet one, underscoring the elements of centralism and curbs on personal choice. The discussion of the role of the Russians in World War II permitted his question of whether the Russians had fought for their country or for their regime. The undersigned told CHERNYSH that his contact with Soviet soldiers during the War had left no doubt in his mind that the latter had fought for their country and families first, and much later to back up their regime. Both SVESTKA and CHERNYSH naturally argued with this view, particularly SVESTKA, who at times can be more pro-Soviet than the Soviets. As pointed out above, CHERNYSH seems to like the undersigned's company, and the farewell between him and the undersigned at the station in Mexico City appeared to be particularly warm. This, of course, is not viewed by the Cubans or SVESTKA with a particularly good eye.\n\nRaymond A. FRADYER\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - 7 (Consular Corps - Mexico City)\n1 - P-13042 (CHERNYSH)\nO - P-12712 (LOGINOV)\n1 - P-7111 (SVESTKA)\n1 - P-10758 (SALAZAR)\n1 - P-1861 (CICARD)\n1 - P-10757 (CEPEDA)\n\nRAF: Imp\nSECRET\n\n17 May 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: The Record\n\nVIA: Chief, SB\nChief of Station\n\nSUBJECT: Celebration of the Czech National Day, 9 May\n\n1. The celebration of the Czech national day on 9 May was held at the residence of the Czech Ambassador, Karel HANUS, in Polanco, where the undersigned estimated that the crowd numbered at least 150 people. The only other Americans present were Mr. Wallace W. STUART, head of the Political Section, and Mr. David N. WIESLEY, Honorary Consul of Iceland. The undersigned was a little bit surprised to see Rodolphe BABOUN, the new Haitian Acting Ambassador, in attendance with a colored Haitian. BABOUN, as a matter of fact, spoke briefly to the Cuban Ambassador, Joaquin HERNANDEZ Armas.\n\n2. The undersigned had several little discussions with Jiri SVESTKA, Czech Consul and known intelligence officer. When he casually reminded SVESTKA that Czechoslovakia was an industrial power before World War I and that Czech products flooded Western Europe, SVESTKA sharply commented that his country was still an industrial power. When the undersigned mentioned that MASARYK was very popular in the United States, SVESTKA countered that that was no doubt because he had lived as an exile in the United States. SVESTKA cut short a remark by the undersigned about the effort currently being made to throw light on MASARYK's death by saying, \"There is no doubt that he committed suicide.\" SVESTKA showed himself on this occasion a rival of LOGINOV as far as provocations are concerned. After the undersigned answered comments on the Negro problem and forthcoming urban terrorism and guerrilla warfare in the United States, SVESTKA mentioned the \"overt letter\" to the American Ambassador which appeared in various local newspapers. He hinted that the incident \"described\"\nin the open letter was not only a blunder on the part of Ambassador FREEMAN, but also indicative of the superiority complex of the United States. At one point, when Valentin LOGINOV had joined in the discussion, the undersigned retorted that the man who had written the article was a fourth-class writer without a dime who somehow had found the thousands of pesos necessary to place his editorial. When the Czech and the Russian laughed, the undersigned continued that if the Soviet Union wanted to give money to the Mexican Communist Party to engage in such shenanigans to amuse the local members of socialist countries, it was fine with the Americans, as this is just about all it could hope to achieve. SVESTKA and LOGINOV naturally denied that their countries had anything to do with the Mexican Communist Party, not to speak of the overt letter on the Ambassador. The undersigned, tongue in cheek, then pointed out that he was glad to tell them for their information that a Communist Party did exist in Mexico. Perhaps the most interesting reaction of SVESTKA came towards the end of the party just before the undersigned left. During a discussion which included SVESTKA, LOGINOV, one of the Soviet military attaches (a tall colonel with white hair), another Russian, and a youngish, short, and chubby member of the Mexican Foreign Ministry the undersigned expressed a thought that the two systems of government, the capitalist and the soviet, were gradually inching closer together. When SVESTKA allowed himself to doubt it with a nasty little laugh the undersigned naturally could not resist telling him to have a look at what was going on in his country. The reaction of SVESTKA was both immediate and noticeable. He sort of straightened out, jerked his head back, opened his mouth, dropped the ashes of his cigar on the floor, and obviously bit his tongue as he said nothing. From the above and from the fact that SVESTKA plans to drive to the next Consular Association meeting in Guadalajara with his Soviet colleagues, the undersigned feels that SVESTKA is not only a lackey of the ex-NOVOTNY regime, but very probably in the employ of the Soviet KGB. He seems to be inseparable from LOGINOV and has lately mouthed the same provocations in the same techniques, showing himself more and more aggressive, a thing which he was not a year ago.\n3. Among other nasty little remarks made by LOGINOV, including references to the open letter against the Ambassador, the war in Vietnam, the Negro problem, the difficult financial position of the dollar, et cetera, was a reference to this Station. LOGINOV at one point asked the undersigned where he worked (not the first time he had asked this). The undersigned told him that he worked in the Consular General's Office. LOGINOV then said, \"What about the fifth floor?\" The undersigned told him that the fifth floor comprised both the Ambassador's Office and the Political Section. LOGINOV went on to say something like, \"I know about the Ambassador, but what about the other offices, those occupied by WOFIRM?\" The undersigned let that one go by as LOGINOV had obviously found it very funny. He proceeded to pay back the Soviets a little later by counting on his fingers the number of visas issued at the Soviet Embassy each year, the number of cultural exchanges handled by the Embassy staff, and \"all the work done for trade promotion with Mexico.\" The undersigned felt that the Soviets probably issued some five visas a month, if that many, had about ten cultural exchanges a year, and had practically no trade with the Mexicans. What, then, he asked, were the 40 odd \"diplomats\" in the Soviet Embassy doing in Mexico? LOGINOV laughed, but he laughed green and promptly broke off this conversation.\n\n4. The undersigned had no opportunity to talk at any length with Ambassador HANUS, who was very busy at the reception. The Ambassador, however, greeted him warmly and gave him a prolonged bear hug as he left. The undersigned had no talk with the Cubans except a few words which he exchanged with Sergio MARTINEZ, whom he had not met before.\n\nRaymond A. FRADYER\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - 7\n1 - P-8691 (Hanus)\n1 - P-5510 (Wiesley)\n1 - P-12397 (Baboun)\n1 - P-7111 (Svestka)\n1 - P-11712 (Loginov)\n\nRAF: Imp\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: BESABER P-8777\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 16 May 1968\n\n1. I met Subject in his room in the Del Paseo Hotel from 1415-1630. The next meeting will be arranged by telephone.\n\n2. LOGINOV. Subject reported that LOGINOV called him at his factory in Cuernavaca on Friday, 3 May. LOGINOV said he had some visitors who would like to buy a few things to take back with them to Russia and asked if it would be convenient if he brought them down to Subject's factory on Saturday afternoon, 4 May. Subject said fine and invited LOGINOV and the visitors to come back to his house for a few drinks after they finished shopping. LOGINOV gratefully accepted and said they would be there at 1330. (Per LIENVOY--see attached transcript--LOGINOV called BEMEEP on 3 May to ask for Subject's telephone number.)\n\n3. LOGINOV arrived (in 19 DA, a dark blue Chevy) at the factory at 1345 with three other persons:\n\n   (a) A big, fat, plain, peasant-looking woman by the name of \"IGOROVA,\" \"IGANOVA,\" or something similar. LOGINOV introduced her as a commercial representative, but did not elaborate.\n\n   (b) A second Russian woman whose name Subject couldn't remember. She looked to be 33-35 years old and wore glasses. LOGINOV did not mention her profession, and she seemed simply to be a friend of the first woman.\n\ncc: P-9097 P-11712\n(c) The son of one of the above two women. He appeared to be about 12 years old.\n\n4. LOGINOV and his three companions shopped for about an hour while Subject worked in his office, and in the end bought 450-500 pesos worth of merchandise (at wholesale prices, of course). Subject and the four Russians then left together, got into their respective cars, and drove to Subject's home with Subject leading the way. When they were driving into Subject's driveway, Subject, in view of his wife and two children and the four Russians, accidentally ran over and broke the back of one of the BESABERS' beloved dachshunds. Chaos reigned for the next ten minutes as Subject went into the house, got his pistol, and returned and shot the dog while the children screamed. Mrs. BESABER tried to suppress her own tears and shoo away the children at the same time, and the four Russians sat aghast in their car and watched. LOGINOV acted extremely sorry and did his best to console Mrs. BESABER and Subject. Mrs. BESABER recovered quickly, however, and soon had all the adults seated in the living room. Subject served the first round of drinks, and within a half hour everyone was at least reasonably relaxed again.\n\n5. LOGINOV was the only one who did not take an alcoholic drink. He wore dark sunglasses all afternoon and explained that he had to stay away from liquor because he was taking antibiotics for an eye infection. Despite this ailment and inability to take a drink, LOGINOV was nevertheless more sociable and friendly than Subject had ever seen him. He also struck Subject as being\nmore relaxed than in the past. He brought the BESABERS two bottles of vodka and two cans of caviar, asked why Subject hadn't called or visited him at the Embassy, addressed Subject only as \"tu\" (where he had formerly mixed \"tus\" and \"ustedes\" with Subject), enthusiastically toured the BESABERS' new house, and patiently translated for the two Russian women, neither of whom spoke Spanish or English. The conversation was generally dull, however, and nothing even mildly controversial was discussed. The Russians finally left about 1700.\n\n6. In the course of the conversation, Mrs. BESABER asked LOGINOV when they were ever going to get together to play tennis. (Mrs. BESABER had of course previously invited LOGINOV to play tennis with her sometime at the home of a retired American gentleman in Cuernavaca (i.e., Col. Lawrence HIGGINS) who was a good friend and who had an exceptionally good court.) LOGINOV replied that he still wanted very much to play, but that it was always a question of time for him. \"Why didn't LOGINOV come down to Cuernavaca next Saturday morning (11 May)?\" Subject interjected. He (LOGINOV) and Mrs. BESABER could play tennis in the morning while Subject was working, and then they could all spend the afternoon at home relaxing. LOGINOV replied that that sounded great, but asked what he was going to do with his wife and child. Mrs. BESABER answered that of course they expected him to bring Mrs. LOGINOV and the child with him. LOGINOV said that would be very nice and he'd like to accept the invitation right at that moment, but he was afraid that his schedule was such that he was going to have to hold off on a definite answer until later in the week. OK, said Subject, \"will you call me, or shall I\ncall you?\" Well, replied LOGINOV, why didn't they leave it that if he didn't hear from Subject, he would call Subject, and vice versa. Subject agreed.\n\n7. Subject said he waited until Friday morning, 10 May, to hear from LOGINOV, and when LOGINOV didn't call, he called LOGINOV (confirmed by LIENVOY). LOGINOV, according to Subject, said he was afraid he was not going to be able to make it, after all, because the Mayor of Moscow was visiting Mexico and he would be tied up with the Mayor on Saturday. Subject said he suggested that perhaps they could make it for the following Saturday, then. LOGINOV replied that he thought he might be able to make it then, but, again, he couldn't say for sure just then. \"But anyway,\" LOGINOV added, \"we're going to be seeing each other more often because we've (i.e., the Soviet Embassy) taken a house on Calle Umbolt (in Cuernavaca) for the summer, and I'll be coming down to Cuernavaca every weekend.\" Subject expressed pleasure at this and said that he'd expect to hear from LOGINOV sometime soon then. LOGINOV assured Subject he would.\n\n8. BEWEEP. BEWEEP called Subject in Cuernavaca about 1400 on 10 May. He said he wanted to tell Subject that a Polish musical group was about to open at Bellas Artes and would be playing some of Subject's grandfather's music. (Subject's paternal grandfather was a pupil of Franz Liszt and, according to Subject, is generally regarded in Poland as the second greatest Polish composer next to Chopin.) BEWEEP asked if Subject was going to be in Mexico City the following week and if he'd have time to accompany BEWEEP to Bellas Artes for a performance. Subject said that unfortunately, he wouldn't be able to go, but suggested that\nBENEEP bring the musicians to his home in Cuernavaca for an afternoon. BENEEP said he wasn't sure if they could work it into their schedule, but he'd check and let Subject know if they could come. (Neither Subject nor BENEEP said anything about the \"vacation trip\" they discussed on 10 April.)\nOut at 1350, LOGINOV talks to YAKOVETS and tells him that LOG would like to go to Cuernavaca tomorrow to see SYRETSKIY. So can YAK give him the phone No of SYR, because several comrades are going on home leave and would like to buy few things. OK, a minute. LOG will have to call early in the morning to the factory and go there after 2 PM. His phone No is 2-09-15, his name is NIKOLAI ZARITSKIY and the factory is on Calle 7777 Taxco. OK.\n\nThanks.\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE FILE\n\nSOURCE: LILYRIC\n\n3 MAY 1968\n\nSUBJECT: VISIT TO THE SOVIET EMBASSY, MEXICO CITY OF UNIDENTIFIED AMERICAN-LOOKING COUPLE.\n\n3 de Mayo de 1968.\nFRIDAY\n\n16:07 Sr y Srita entran Sur (Norteamericanos)\n16:37 Los mismos salen Norte\n\nEstuvieron con Log.\n\nEl hombre como de 25 a\u00f1os aprox., guapo, con ropa sport.\nLa mujer como de 23 a\u00f1os aprox.\n\nPhotos attached\n\nFILE: 50-3-10/11\n\ncc P-11762\nSECRET\n\n3 May 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: (fnu) LAMBERT, British Subject\n\n1. At 0945 hours 2 April 1968, Subject called for Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV and left a message that he was the person who was going to give LOGINOV English lessons. He also left his telephone number: 11-02-88. (This is listed in the reverse directory for Maya Internacional SA de CV; it does not appear however in the current telephone directory.)\n\n2. At 1208 hours on 2 April, Sra. Cora (fnu) tells LOGINOV that the teacher she recommends for him is 21 years of age, studying for his doctorate in literature in Mexico, and prior to returning to England is willing to give lessons; he is presently giving classes for other PhD's.\n\n3. At 1320 hours, LAMBERT tells LOGINOV that Sra. Cora told him to get in touch with LOGINOV regarding English lessons. LAMBERT would like to talk about it. LOGINOV agrees, but says he is very busy right now and will call LAMBERT at the end of the week to make arrangements.\n\n4. Source: LIENVOY 2 April 1968, all on 15-60-55.\n\nWanda L. VERMILY\n\nFile:\nP-11712\n\nNote: Memo to SMITH on 2 May 68\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n2 May 1968\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT : LIOVAL-1\n\nDATE OF MEETING : 30 April 1968\n\n1. Subject called me on 29 April and we agreed to meet at the restaurant \"Bocana\". The meeting lasted from 14:30 to 15:40. I advanced Subject 500 MN for his Russian lessons. Next meeting is at the Bocana at 13:45 on 17 May.\n\n2. Subject reported that he had gone by the IICMR to inquire about Russian lessons but was totally unimpressed. He gave his name and talked to the Director of Courses whose name he didn't get. He will write up the details for the next meeting.\n\n3. He then contacted VIDIELLA at the latter's Institute and invited him out to discuss Russian lessons. Since it wasn't a personal matter VIDIELLA suggested that they bring along a couple of the students. Odile MORISSET, a French teacher also came along. They went to Sanborn's cocktail lounge. While talking Sra. MORISSET (she is divorced) invited Subject to her home for a party and said he could spend the night with her if he came. She gave her address as, Paris 7, Apt. 5. Subject described her as ca. 40 years old. Later VIDIELLA told Subject that MORISSET will sleep with anybody and that he usually shacks up with her on Fridays.\n\n4. Subject told VIDIELLA that he had gone to the IICMR but it looked poor. VIDIELLA agreed, saying the teachers are no good. He did not say that he is or was connected with the IICMR. VIDIELLA suggested that Subject take private lessons from him. Subject protested that he would need accreditation which he could use for further formal study. VIDIELLA said Subject could study with him and then take exams at the Institute which would give him a certificate for that level. He said the Director would be glad to do this. So they agreed, VIDIELLA will give Subject private classes at Subject's afternoon school twice a week from 19:00 to 20:00 on Mondays and Wednesdays. Price will be 50 MN per lesson. Subject paid him 400 MN in advance. The first lesson was on 29 April. Since 1 May is a holiday Subject will go to VIDIELLA's apt. He gave his address as Romero de Terreros 1153 apt. 1 (we had 9922, apt. 1) and telephone 43-60-16.\n5. In the presence of all VIDIELLA boasted about his great Soviet friend, Valentino, the consul (this is obviously LOGINOV). The two students and MORISSET all seemed to know LOGINOV personally. One of the students asked VIDIELLA if he had been invited to the Soviet 1 May celebration. He said that he hadn't. He then asked Subject, if he knew any Soviets. Subject answered as casually as he could that he had known one casually with whom he used to go fishing and changed the subject. Subject didn't feel that VIDIELLA was fishing for information but I am not so sure.\n\n6. I briefed Subject on what to look for in his lessons with VIDIELLA, to take short notes, and to have a written report for our next meeting.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\nSECRET\n\nMay 2, 1968\nNo. 080\n\nSUBJECT: Soviet Cultivation of British Subjects\n\n1. It has come to our attention that the Soviets, specifically KGB officers, have been looking around for English language instructors. One KGB officer, Valentin Sergeevich LOGINOV, is notorious for using this tactic to assess contacts who may be of use to him.\n\n2. Among the persons in whom LOGINOV is reported to have shown interest are two British subjects:\n   a. A young student, (fnu) LAMBERT, who is studying for a doctorate in literature in Mexico and who prior to returning to Britain is giving English lessons.\n   b. Walter James PLUMB, Director of the Anglo-Mexican Institute.\n\n3. It is suggested that you might wish to contact these individuals to determine if the Soviets are indeed cultivating them. I would appreciate receiving the results of such interviews.\n\nW.L. VERMILYEH: vgp\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - SMICA\n1- 50-2-6\n2- P-11712\nLICALLA - 26 APRIL 1968\n\nUNIDENTIFIED WOMAN WHO SEEN INSIDE SOV EMBASSY AT 1040 HOURS.\nENTERED RECEPTION ROOM WITH LOGINOV, LEFT SOV EMBASSY AT 1052 HOURS.\n\nFILE P-11712\nI believe we should index all names connected w/ Fr. KURGUS.\nAgree? Yes.\n\n23 Apr 68\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Initials]\n\nP.S. Nicolas KURGUS\n(1 - 13,262)\nEl Padre Kurgus (...y no es comunista) se lleva\nMuchos Cuid! a Rusia\n\n\u00a1FELIZ VIAJE!\n\nPor ANA Mar\u00eda Loragi.\n\nCon un corte celebr\u00f3 el aniversario \u00faltimo por la noche en el teatro hablaron los numerosos pa-\nsantes invitados quienes el domingo 26 del actual saldr\u00e1n para viajar en un avi\u00f3n a la Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica en un viaje recreativo y cultural.\n\nEl viaje que comprende 7 d\u00edas en Mosc\u00fa, 3 en Leningrado, 3 en Kiev y 3 en Par\u00eds, fue anunciado por el reverendo padre Pedro Nicol\u00e1s Kurgus O.P., director de la Provincia Interamericana de los Hermanos de la Instrucci\u00f3n, en el reciente encuentro con el se\u00f1or Valentin Legunov, Consul de la U.R.S.S.\n\nEl padre Kurgus, quien adem\u00e1s el anuncio con conocidas agencias de viajes, representadas por los se\u00f1ores Jos\u00e9 Antonio Salazar, Antonio Quintero y Joseph A. Ruben, anunciaron en el momento del mencionado cortejo.\n\nA la reuni\u00f3n, asistieron el embajador de honor, la se\u00f1ora Judith C. A. Kurgus, y la directora de la Provincia Interamericana, quien fue recibida por el representante del se\u00f1or Legunov, en las instalaciones del consulado, en las cuales se realizaron las presentaciones de \"Casa Blanca\", en las cuales los futuros viajeros pudieron conocer y visitar las instalaciones que visitar\u00e1n pr\u00f3ximamente.\n\nEn el cortejo, adem\u00e1s de los mencionados, se encontraron numerosos invitados, entre ellos, el embajador de honor, la se\u00f1ora Judith C. A. Kurgus, y la directora de la Provincia Interamericana, quienes fueron recibidos con un cordial saludo por el se\u00f1or Legunov, en las instalaciones del consulado, en las cuales se realizaron las presentaciones de \"Casa Blanca\", en las cuales los futuros viajeros pudieron conocer y visitar las instalaciones que visitar\u00e1n pr\u00f3ximamente.\n\nEn el cortejo, adem\u00e1s de los mencionados, se encontraron numerosos invitados, entre ellos, el embajador de honor, la se\u00f1ora Judith C. A. Kurgus, y la directora de la Provincia Interamericana, quienes fueron recibidos con un cordial saludo por el se\u00f1or Legunov, en las instalaciones del consulado, en las cuales se realizaron las presentaciones de \"Casa Blanca\", en las cuales los futuros viajeros pudieron conocer y visitar las instalaciones que visitar\u00e1n pr\u00f3ximamente.\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\n29 March 1968\n\n1. On the occasion of the visit of the local Consular Association to the \"Home Fair\" on 28 March the undersigned conversed on and off with Jiri SVESTKA (P-7111), Second Secretary of the Czechoslovak Embassy and known member of the Czech Intelligence Service. The undersigned asked SVESTKA what was going on in his country. The Czech launched into an explanation which sounded like a recitation. The essence of his comments was that when leaders have lost touch with the people, they should be replaced. The recent changes in Czechoslovakia would ensure more democracy for the people and would more closely represent their views and take care of their needs. Fifteen years in power, he said, is a long time for a leader. The undersigned pointed out that the recent changes in Czechoslovakia might not please \"everybody\", SVESTKA agreed that this was bound to happen, but that his country had the right to do what it wanted without worrying too much about the opinion of some of its neighbors. The undersigned then went one step further and pointed out that ULBRICH from East Germany for one seemed to be worried about possible repercussion of the Czech reforms on his regime. SVESTKA said he did not care what ULBRICH said or did and repeated that the Czechs are masters of their country. When the undersigned pointed out that the new president was not a member of the Communist Party but had headed a Czech Division that fought with the Russians SVESTKA agreed that this was a good choice that should please a lot of people. Throughout his talk with the undersigned, however, SVESTKA tried to play down the degree to which things are going to change in his country as a result of recent reforms.\n\n2. Just to test SVESTKA a little further, the undersigned asked him what he thought of the U.S. elections. With a broad grin SVESTKA stated that Senator KENNEDY would undoubtedly be the next president. When the undersigned replied that he hoped not, SVESTKA said, \"If I were an American I would vote for him.\" Valentin LOGINOV of the Soviet Embassy joined the conversation at this point. The two went on to say that KENNEDY was the only candidate for peace and social justice, that he had their moral support and sympathy (this given reports for an intel. report) etc. SVESTKA added that the war in Vietnam was good for the U.S. economy. The undersigned told him that the USSR manufactured more rockets than bathtubs and more machine guns than cars.\n\nRaymond S. FRADYER\n\nP. 11712\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Jorge ARIAS Buerba\n\n1. Subject is a 26 year old Mexican citizen (although he looks to be in his 30's). He is a Spanish teacher at the Mexican-North American Institute and since the fall of 1967 has held a second job as the director of the Community Services Program at the American School. In April 1967 he married an American citizen from the Chicago area named Donna WEINTHALER (phonetic). They live at Juanacatlan 15, which is just around the corner from the Soviet Embassy. Home phone is 15-28-49.\n\n2. Subject was recommended as a Spanish tutor in August 1966 by Enrique GUTIERREZ Martinez (P-12667), who was then C/SB's Spanish tutor. GUTIERREZ was subsequently recruited by C/SB as a utility agent, but has since been dropped because he is related to other Station assets. On GUTIERREZ's recommendation, I began taking private Spanish lessons from Subject in August 1966. I found Subject an excellent teacher and continued taking lessons from him until December 1966. In March 1967, my wife and I had Subject as a teacher in Spanish courses we took at the Mexican-North American Institute. I have maintained intermittent social contact with Subject since March 1967, and my wife has become friendly with Subject's wife, having visited her at her apartment two or three times and having had her to our home during the day an equal number of times. I have also\n\nFiles: P-12671\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\nP-117/2\nkept informed to some extent about Subject through his younger brother, Javier ARIAS Buerba, from whom I have been taking Spanish lessons since July 1967.\n\n3. Subject was a casual contact of Station officer Olivia C. RAGNITY in 1965 and 1966. Other than a file card noting this contact, there are no Station traces on either Jorge or Javier ARIAS Buerba.\n\n4. Subject and I from the beginning have had a very friendly and informal relationship. He is an intelligent person with a friendly, open personality and a good sense of humor. Politically, he is pro-American to the point that he magnifies our strengths and positive qualities and tends to minimize or overlook negative factors in our society. Subject knows I am with the Political Section of the Embassy and that I have been in the Soviet Union. We have consequently gotten onto the topic of Russians and Communism several times, and he has always come out a strong anti-Communist. He has one brother and two sisters living in the United States. The brother is married to an American and lives in Virginia, where he is in the construction business. One of the sisters is also married to an American and lives in California (I believe San Francisco). The second sister is married to a Polish immigrant and lives with him in Chicago. The sister in California is a naturalized American citizen. The brother and the sister in Chicago are not.\n\n5. On 24 April 1967, LIENVOY reported the following call from GAZIYEV to LOGINOV:\n\nGAZ: \"I saw him, he arrived yesterday.\"\nLOG: \"Excellent. Then I'd like to see you to discuss certain things.\"\n\nGAZ: \"Then I can come there tomorrow?\"\n\nLOG: \"No, better Wednesday.\"\n\nGAZ: \"All right. He usually comes there at 6 o'clock. He got married and came here with his wife. Now they look for an apartment. I'll go there on the 10th, because I want to attend courses in English. This week I'll be busy.\"\n\nLOG: \"OK, until the next then.\"\n\n6. From this conversation, it appeared that GAZIYEV was probably talking about Subject, since:\n\n(a) GAZIYEV had been taking Spanish at the Mexican-North American Institute and I knew from Subject that Subject had had GAZIYEV in one of his classes, that Subject occasionally chatted with GAZIYEV after class, and that GAZIYEV had once given Subject an invitation to a Consular night at the Soviet Embassy (although Subject told me he had not gone).\n\n(b) Subject had gotten married that month.\n\n(c) Subject had just returned to Mexico with his bride.\n\n(d) Subject and his wife were looking for an apartment.\n\n(e) Subject normally arrived at the Institute at 1800 to teach evening Spanish classes.\n\n7. Prior to this reported telephone conversation, I had considered using Subject as an access agent against GAZIYEV, but had decided not to approach Subject on the matter unless there was evidence that his relationship with GAZIYEV was developing into something more than occasional chats between classes. I did not see much potential in approaching Subject before this with the idea of having him deliberately cultivate a friendship with GAZIYEV, as I felt Subject was living\nsuch a busy and hectic life that I would get very little out of him. Prior to his marriage, he was keeping such a hectic schedule between his Institute and private classes that he wasn't sleeping or eating properly and was having increasing problems with his health. If anything, his pace and health problems increased after his marriage and his taking of the job with the American School (although he gave up most of his private classes).\n\n8. Since the GAZIYEV-LOGINOV conversation made Subject's relations with the Soviets look much more interesting, I attempted to find out what I could about them from Subject. For a number of reasons, however\u2014including my going to the States in June\u2014we were not able to get together until 11 July. On that date I took Subject to a belated \"bachelor's lunch\" at a little Spanish restaurant downtown.\n\n9. The lunch was disappointing and, for me, misleading. I was certain that if given the opportunity, Subject would voluntarily tell me if his relationship with GAZIYEV had developed any further. When I casually brought the conversation around to GAZIYEV, however, Subject simply told me that GAZIYEV was still studying at the Institute and that he still occasionally chatted with him in the halls or over a cup of coffee in one of the near-by coffee shops during the 20-minute break between the two evening classes. Subject commented that he enjoyed talking with GAZIYEV, as he was a simpatico, interesting guy, as well as an outstanding Spanish student. He also added that they never talked politics. In reply to an offhand question about whether he had met any other Soviets through GAZIYEV, Subject\nsaid that he had not. My inclination was to believe Subject, and I went away thinking that either GAZIYEV and LOGINOV had been talking about someone else over the phone or that they had never gone beyond the stage of simply talking about Subject.\n\n10. On 1 November 1967, I ran into Subject and his brother Javier in Sanborns-Insurgentes. They were about to have a quick lunch and insisted that I join them for a cup of coffee. As soon as we sat down, Subject told me he had a problem and would like my advice. He said GAZIYEV had given him an invitation to the 7 November celebration of the Revolution at the Soviet Embassy, and although he would like to go for the experience, he was very concerned that his name would be put on \"the black list\" at the U.S. Embassy if he went. He said that he had tried to call me at the Embassy after he got the invitation to ask my advice, but had been told I was out of town. (I was in El Paso from 25-29 October.) He stated that if he had not been able to reach me in the next day or two, he was going to simply walk into the Embassy and ask to see someone from the \"security department\" about his predicament. What did I think he should do?\n\n11. I told Subject to relax and forget about going to the U.S. Embassy, as the Embassy would not give him any advice other than to tell him that it was entirely his own business whether he went to the Soviet reception or not. Besides, I asked, what made Subject think his name would be put on a \"black list\" if he went. Subject replied that he didn't know how the U.S. Embassy did it, but \"everyone knew\" the U.S. Embassy obtained the names of everyone who went in and out of\nthe Soviet Embassy. Moreover, he said, even if the U.S. Embassy refused to give him any advice, at least it would make a record of his visit and anyone who was ever interested would his heart was in the right place. He simply did not want and couldn't afford to get into any trouble with the U.S. Embassy, he said. After all, he had an American wife, he might want to go to the States to study sometime, and they might even want to go to the States to live someday. Seeing that Subject was indeed very serious, I became more serious myself and told him that just so he wouldn't worry, I'd write a memo to the proper Embassy department stating for the sake of the record that Subject had told me he planned to attend a Soviet Embassy reception, but wished the U.S. Embassy to know he was doing it solely out of curiosity and was in no way in sympathy with the Soviet Union. Subject seemed greatly relieved and thanked me very much.\n\n12. Seizing of the fact that GAZIYEV had given Subject the invitation, I asked if Subject saw much of him anymore. Subject replied that yes, he still saw him occasionally, as GAZIYEV was now studying English at the Institute. Subject added, on his own initiative, that he had also been to GAZIYEV's apartment twice and had met another Soviet there on one occasion. He said that the first time he went to GAZIYEV's was shortly before he (Subject) got married (Subject was married about mid-April 1967) and the second time was shortly after his marriage, as he and his wife had gone to dinner at the GAZIYEVS'. Subject finished eating about this time, and since he was in a hurry and had his brother with him, I didn't try to question him any further, but decided to wait and have a second go at him alone another\ntime.\n\n13. My wife and I entertained Subject and his wife at our home on 27 November, but the evening was not meant to and did not afford an opportunity to discuss the Soviets any further. Subject did tell me, however, that he had not gone to the 7 November Soviet reception after all, because, despite by assurances that there was no reason for him not to go, he felt it was simply safer to stay away from the Soviet Embassy altogether. At my suggestion, we agreed to get together for lunch sometime in the near future.\n\n14. For various reasons, including the poor state of Subject's health when I called him one day in January, we did not get together for the lunch until 7 March. This time, I played it straight with Subject, told him that I was interested in anything he could tell me about GAZIYEV and the other Soviet he had met, and questioned him closely regarding the details. Subject was completely cooperative, and I am satisfied he answered my questions to the best of his ability. It seemed to me, and still does, that there was only one possible reason why Subject had not told me on 11 July what he subsequently told me on 1 November (i.e., that he had been to GAZIYEV's home twice and on one occasion had met another Soviet there). This was that he felt somewhat guilty about going to GAZIYEV's and meeting the other Soviet there, and as long as I didn't push him too hard (which I didn't on 11 July), he felt more comfortable ignoring it. The reason he so readily mentioned the two visits and the other Soviet on 1 November was, I think, that he was genuinely concerned not to \"get into any trouble\" with the U.S.\nEmbassy over attending the Soviet Embassy reception, wished to impress me with his sincerity about whose side he was on, and felt obliged to completely clear the record by mentioning the visits to GAZIYEV's home and meeting the other Soviet there.\n\n15. Subject stated that GAZIYEV had invited him to his apartment for dinner about a month before he (Subject) went to Chicago to get married. This means that the dinner took place about mid-March 1967. Subject said he had expected to find only GAZIYEV and his wife in the apartment, but that a third person was there when Subject arrived. Subject said GAZIYEV introduced the third person as Valentin \"something.\" When I asked if the last name were LOGINOV, Subject immediately reacted and said he was almost positive that was it. Subject's description of the Soviet also fit LOGINOV. GAZIYEV stated that LOGINOV was with the Embassy (Subject couldn't remember in what capacity) and described LOGINOV as a good friend. Subject said that the evening started off very casually, with LOGINOV expressing interest in the Spanish courses at the Mexican-North American Institute. LOGINOV, who Subject noted spoke almost as good Spanish as most of the Spanish teachers at the Institute, said he'd like to get a certificate in Spanish from the Institute and asked Subject if he could help him enroll, choose the best course for him to start with, etc. Subject replied that he'd be happy to, although it didn't seem to him that LOGINOV needed much instruction in Spanish. LOGINOV simply laughed this off, and it was agreed LOGINOV would drop around to the Institute sometime soon. LOGINOV, who took the lead in the conversation most of the evening, then began to ask Subject questions which left Subject\nwith \"no doubt\" that he (LOGINOV) was trying to feel Subject out on his political views. Subject said that he couldn't remember most of LOGINOV's questions, but he did recall that LOGINOV began the feeling-out procedure by asking Subject if he didn't find that the Americans were much poorer at learning Spanish than other nationalities. He also made various derogatory remarks about the extent of American influence in Mexico. Subject said that after about ten minutes, LOGINOV's purpose became so blatantly obvious, that he (Subject) stopped the conversation and told LOGINOV that before they went any farther, he thought LOGINOV should know that he was talking to someone who was \"100% capitalist,\" completely pro-American, and had absolutely no sympathy with Communism. (While this sounds awfully blunt and Subject was unquestionably trying to make himself look good in my eyes, the fact of the matter is that Subject does tend to be a bit blunt at times, and knowing his ideological leanings, I would not put it past him to have said exactly this.) Subject said that LOGINOV tried to backtrack a bit after this, but the conversation heated up again a few minutes later when Subject commented that he had a pretty good idea of what the Soviets were up to in Mexico. When LOGINOV asked what Subject meant, Subject related the story he once told me about having been in Veracruz a few years ago when a Soviet ship was actually or virtually put under arrest there. Subject told LOGINOV that \"everyone knew the ship was loaded with Communist propaganda.\"\n\n16. After about twenty minutes, according to Subject, politics were dropped and the conversation turned to more innocuous topics.\nSubject said that LOGINOV seemed somewhat irritated with him, but on the whole kept his composure very well and treated Subject politely for the two hours or less Subject remained. As Subject was leaving, LOGINOV again said he'd come by the Institute to see Subject in the near future, but he never did. One day in late 1967 Subject saw LOGINOV at the gas station on the corner of Tacubaya and Juanacatlan, and LOGINOV greeted Subject by name. However, they did not converse with each other.\n\n17. Subject said that GAZIYEV left most of the politically related part of the conversation to LOGINOV and never referred to the evening again. However, a few weeks after Subject returned to Mexico with his bride, GAZIYEV had Subject and his wife over to dinner (this would place the second dinner in about mid-May). This time GAZIYEV and his wife were the only others present, and the evening passed without any reference to politics. Subject stated that he still occasionally goes across the street for a cup of coffee with GAZIYEV between evening classes at the Institute, but that he has not been to GAZIYEV's apartment again and has never had GAZIYEV to his home.\n\n18. Although Subject was very aware that LOGINOV's purpose in meeting him was to assess his exploitability, he did not seem to fully appreciate that GAZIYEV had both fingered him for LOGINOV and set up the situation for LOGINOV to meet him. I spelled this out for Subject and also informed him that LOGINOV was an exceptionally capable Soviet intelligence officer. I also explained that it was very possible GAZIYEV was using the Institute to spot other candidates for interviews with Soviet\nintelligence officers, and questioned Subject about GAZIYEV's activities and contacts at the Institute. However, Subject said that as far as he could tell GAZIYEV pretty much stuck to himself at the Institute and did not have any particular friends there whom Subject knew about. Subject said he would keep his eyes open for the type of thing I was looking for, however, and would let me know if he came onto anything interesting. Subject also offered to \"play up to\" GAZIYEV and/or LOGINOV under my guidance if I wished, but I declined the offer with appropriate expressions of appreciation.\n\n19. The question that remains unanswered after all this is, of course, why LOGINOV and GAZIYEV were talking about Subject over the phone on 24 April 1967. According to Subject, the dinner which LOGINOV attended took place in March 1967, while LOGINOV did not attend GAZIYEV's second dinner, which took place about mid-May. Since I am satisfied Subject told me the truth, it would appear that the \"certain things\" which LOGINOV told GAZIYEV on 24 April he wished to discuss with GAZIYEV concerned how to handle Subject in the light of the LOGINOV-Subject encounter in March. Whatever LOGINOV had in mind on 24 April, it would appear that it was finally decided that GAZIYEV and his wife should simply have Subject and his wife over to a peaceful dinner in order to at least partially erase the memory of the first dinner.\n\nSB/L\nLOGUNOV, Mrs. Valentin\n\nNovember 7, 1967. 1100 hours.\nSource: My wife.\n\nFrench Club. My wife talked to Logunov at the French Club. There seemed to be considerable doubt about their communication. Logunov might have said that she had just played tennis, or was about to play tennis, or plays tennis occasionally. It seems likely that she did not play and was not about to play. She probably came to the club for the steam bath. She was in a hurry, possibly to leave the club.\n\nCharles\n\nMrs. Small. (Wife of American communist with jewelry shop on Nica). Soon for the first time at the French Club. She was practicing alone with a ball boy. She had no partner.\n\nCOMMENT\n\nIt is possible that Mrs. Logunov and Mrs. Small are part of a communications channel. Logunov's haste might have been due to the unexpected appearance of my wife and the risk that Small might arrive while my wife was still in the vicinity.\n\nSource: Wilson.\nExtracts from LIREALM-1 contact reports\n\n10 May 1967\n\nLOGINOV played tennis at Munder with S.S. Abdel Rahman Hassan Abdel-RAHMAN, 1st Secretary and Consul at UAR Embassy. This was the first time they had played together. (played doubles with LIREALM and his wife).\n\n14 May 1967\n\nLIREALM played tennis at Munder with LOGINOV. LOGINOV's son Dmitry was there, speaks absolutely no Spanish or English. Also played with Jacques LEMAIRE. LOGINOV said his wife had had several heart attacks in Mexico and cannot play tennis. LOGINOV said he wanted Dmitry to learn English, like his sister in Moscow. LOGINOV said he knew Jean BINEAU, when asked if he knew any French diplomats. LOGINOV claimed to have been in Soviet Navy, then immediately entered the Foreign Service Institute and straight into foreign service after that.\n\n17 May 1967\n\nLOGINOV plays tennis left-handed. An instructor commented that he was convinced LOGINOV had played much more than the one year he admits to. The instructor said he had never seen LOGINOV play with an instructor.\n\n20 May 1967\n\nLIREALM saw LOGINOV at Munder but did not play with him.\n\n25 Jun 1967\n\nLOGINOVA said she was chemist, but did not say whether she had ever worked in that profession. The LOGINOVs never eat any food at the club, but LOGINOV drinks beer there. The week before LOGINOV played in mixed doubles match with 16 year old girl and won a small silver cup. LOGINOV had a Russian movie camera with him and took pictures of people at the Club. LOGINOV talked to a Mexican named Jose Manuel LNU, connected with some Mexican ministry that assists SovEmb personnel; LOGINOVA said Jose Manuel was very sympathetic to them; LOGINOV said they had met at the Canadian or French Embassy.\n\n10 Jun 1967\n\nLOGINOVA seems intelligent, educated, quiet but friendly. Her Spanish is not as bad as LOGINOV had indicated.\nValentin's friends, June 30, 1967.\n\nContact. My lawyer celebrated his 40th birthday on June 30. Jim and Connie Pollack offered their home at Calero 76 in San Angel for a party for my lawyer. Of the 12 to 14 people at the party the following are part of a group who have organized a Great Books type club. At least once, and possibly twice or three times they have invited Valentin Loginov.\n\nDoug Wiltshire\nTinnie Davis\nAlexander \"Sandy\" Reed\nWerner Thurau\n\nDoug Wiltshire, about Kasri. Doug claimed that Kasri, his partner is pro-U.S. and anti-Masser. He believes that Kasri's wife is the secretary to the ambassador.\n\nWerner Thurau. The Anglo-American directory lists Werner as British. My lawyer states that he is actually Danish. He previously lived in San Angel to the Lomas address now shown in the directory. He since has moved back to Aida in San Angel and lives one or two doors from Tinnie Davis. He is listed as vice-president of Jeffrey Manufacturing. He is reported to have studied at Oxford.\n\nMy lawyer, who is one of the more brilliant humorous-type intellectuals in Mexico has described Werner as the most brilliant person he has met in Mexico. Werner's friends are agreed, behind his back, that Werner is \"ill-employed\", that he is earning far less than he deserves. His standard of living strikes his friends as austere.\n\nSheila O'Sullivan Kabbo Thurau. Sheila is the wife of Werner and was not at the party due to illness. She is an actress, attractive, extrovert, and the sometime mistress of Jim Tiernay (spelling?) the former head of the Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico, now at the home office in New York. I have often run across Sheila, but this was the first time I saw Werner.\n\nWerner Thurau, about Valentin. As Werner was introduced to me he acted very surprised. He explained that he thought I was someone else, a friend of his, Valentin Loginov. He claimed that we\ncould be twin brothers. My wife overheard this performance and felt it was highly overplayed. My opinion was that this was a conversation starter, nothing more. Werner expected me to show interest in his having met a Russian. I did. Werner then told me about the book group. I had heard of it before through my lawyer and through Valentin. I had never before realized they were around the same group. Werner spoke of only one occasion when Valentin was there\u2014he did not say there were not other occasions. Valentin spoke of several occasions. Werner described Valentin as good-natured, narrow intellectually and curious.\n\nI did not acknowledge knowing Valentin but avoided the issue. I do not know who knew Valentin and first invited him to the group. I do not know how often the group meets or where.\n\nComments\n\nI found Werner to be very interesting and charming. I have held the same opinion about his wife for some time. I believe I could develop him if it were of interest.\n\nWerner deserves to be checked. Everyone seems agreed that there is something missing here.\n\nI would not mind belonging to a book group\u2014I have in the past. This one should be real swinging and might have Val as a permanent visitor.\n11 October 1967\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: L: 10742\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 10 October 1967\n\n1. I met with Subject at the restaurant of the Del Paseo from 09:15 to 10:00. Next meeting to be arranged by phone. Subject will take a month's vacation with his family from 26 October to 23 November. He will go to South Africa and other countries in Africa.\n\n2. During the week of 2 September, PRIKHODKO came to Subject's office to announce that he was back from home leave. Subject asked him about the status of the proposed Soviet tourist office. PRIKHODKO said that the Mexican Government had turned it down. Specifically SALVAT had told the Soviets that the tourist exchange between the Soviet Union and Mexico was so insignificant that it did not justify a reciprocal exchange of tourist offices (Comment: Evidently the Mexicans used the reciprocity issue to deny the Soviet request.)\n\n3. PRIKHODKO also said that Oleg NECHIPORENKO (P-7442) would arrive in Mexico in October and that he would have a job in the Embassy, not in the consulate.\n\n4. While PRIKHODKO was in Subject's office, Senador ECHEVARRIA, the brother of the Secretary of Gobernacion came in and Subject introduced them.\n\n5. Finally, PRIKHODKO mentioned that YATSKOV would be leaving soon PCS (Comment: As I mentioned earlier, I'll bet that NECHIPORENKO replaces YATSKOV).\n\n6. The next day LOGINOV called Subject and asked him to come to a cafe near Subject's office. LOGINOV started off by calling Subject a son-of-a-bitch. He said, \"Look at all the contacts you have in Mexico, even ECHEVARRIA's brother\". He then went on to berate Subject for refusing to continue to work for the Soviets. He became quite heated at times. Subject repeated all the arguments he had used earlier about willing to be friends but refusing to help the Soviets in a clandestine capacity. During the discussion LOGINOV asked if Subject knew the \"legal counsellor\" of the US Embassy.\nBy this he meant the Embassy's lawyer, not the legal attach\u00e9. Subject just laughed at him.\n\n7. On 7 October Miguel ALEMAN JR. came to Subject and said that he and Jacobo ZABLUDOWSKY had just seen Ambassador BAZAROV. They wanted BAZAROV to make arrangements to get them to the USSR for television coverage of the 50th Anniversary celebrations. BAZAROV had told them that things were very tight but if they went to Subject and he could arrange accommodations, BAZAROV would see that they got to the USSR. (Comment: From LIENVOY we know that the two had an appointment with BAZAROV on 9 October and that they had been agitating for permits for about a week. I feel that by sending them to Subject, BAZAROV was giving them the brush off. If the Soviets were really interested in seeing them go, they would handle it differently.)\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: BESABER P-3777\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 28 September 1967\n\n1. I met Subject in his room at the Del Paseo from 1415-1530. Subject will call me a day in advance to set the date of the next meeting, which as usual will be in the Del Paseo.\n\n2. Subject had not seen or talked with CHMYKHOV or any other Soviet since he and CHMYKHOV were out together on the evening of 4 August. At that time, CHMYKHOV suggested that he and Subject have dinner together the next time Subject was in Mexico City. Subject agreed and told CHMYKHOV he'd call him the next time he was in town. Due to Subject's tight schedules on his visits to Mexico City, however, it wasn't until 28 September that he called CHMYKHOV. When Subject called the Embassy, however, he was told CHMYKHOV wasn't in. He therefore asked for LOGINOV, who proved to be in. LOGINOV immediately recognized Subject's voice and sounded very pleased to hear from him. He stated that he had had a wonderful holiday in the USSR (he returned on 27 August), but was now swamped with work. He added that he had planned to call Subject as soon as he got things under control. Subject thereupon said that he was actually calling for CHMYKHOV, because he didn't think LOGINOV had returned to Mexico yet. LOGINOV replied that CHMYKHOV wasn't in just then, but they'd both very much like to visit Subject in Cuernavaca. Subject said that he'd like to have them, but suggested they hold off for a week or so until the weather got better. LOGINOV agreed and said he'd talk to CHMYKHOV.\n\ncc: P-6235 P-11712\nabout a time. In any case, LOGINOV said, they wouldn't just drop in on Subject, but would call ahead of time.\n\nf\n\nSB/L\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Erika Camerman\n\nSOURCE: LICOZY-5\n\n1. On 7 September 1967 I asked Source about Subject. He knows her well.\n\n2. The Camerman's are Rumanian Jews who came to Mexico about 15 years ago. Eugene was a brilliant man who started with nothing and ended up very wealthy. Several years ago he attempted to negotiate trade between Mexico and Rumania but without results. He died of a heart attack about two years ago.\n\n3. Erika is a charming, intelligent, cultured west-European type. She is not a leftist. She owns and runs INCOMEX at Isabella la Catolica 45 (telephone 18-65-61) and (12-88-32), a wine and cheese importing company. On ca. 1 September she left Mexico to some \"bad\" in Austria for a month. At Source's suggestion she added 2 weeks in Israel to view the conquest.\n\n4. They have a daughter, Marina, who is stunningly beautiful. Marina met and married a German Gentile in New York for which her mother and family ostracized her. Source does not know where Marina is at present.\n\n5. Although I did not mention my reason for interest, Source stated that if Erika is in touch with Soviets it would only be to get their business. She would not find Soviets either ideologically or personally attractive.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nSECRET\n13 September 1967\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LICOZY-5\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 7 September 1967\n\n1. I had breakfast with Subject at the Del Paseo from 0900 to 1000. Next meeting will be arranged by phone. Subject will go to Montreal for a conference on tourism to Israel from 23 to 26 September.\n\n2. Subject had lunch with LOGINOV on 31 August. LOGINOV brought him caviar which Subject had requested and paid for. The following Subjects came up:\n\n   a. LOGINOV volunteered that NECHIPORENKO (P-7442) will return to Mexico in the fall. Subject asked if NECHIPORENKO would return to Consular work. LOGINOV said that he would not but would have other work in the Embassy. (Comment: I will bet that he replaces YATSKOV).\n\n   b. The larger part of the lunch was devoted to LOGINOV asking Subject about his trip to Israel and Subject's gleeful lists of captured Soviet equipment.\n\n   c. LOGINOV said he has reports that Mexican right wing youth groups are planning to sabotage the celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the Revolution and asked Subject for information. Subject said he had no information on, or, contacts with groups of that nature.\n\n3. The following Mexicans have booked travel to the USSR with Subject. They are all local Jews with relatives in the USSR:\n\n   a. Mr. & Mrs. Samuel KASOVICH\n   b. Abraham YANOFSKY to Moscow and Tashkent\n   c. Pedro BRAILOVSKY to Moscow, Kiev and Leningrad.\n\n4. Subject has booked passage to Cuba for a Russian emigre, Nikolay CHERNESHOV and his family; wife born in Italy and children, Igor, Natalia and Sergio all born in Venezuela. LOGINOV told Subject that they are repatriates from Venezuela and that they will go from Cuba to the USSR on a Soviet cargo ship.\n5. Subject has checked with Adolfo de la Huerta of Salvat's office about the Soviet application for a tourist office. De la Huerta had heard about it but said it was not their affair and would be handled by Gobernacion.\n\n6. David KLEINMAN, ca 55 yrs. old, born in Russia recently made reservations to go to Moscow during the celebration of the 50th anniversary. He will go in a private capacity as a tourist. Subject described him as an orthodox Communist and was particularly galled that KLEINMAN, a Jew called Israel an aggressor.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\nTHE CONSULAR SECTION OF THE USSR EMBASSY IN MEXICO CITY\n\nThe consular section consists of three persons:\n\nValentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV - consul (third secretary)\nVladislav Sergeyevich KORUSKIN - vice consul (Attache)\nVladimir Ivanovich SHPAKEVICH - vice consul (third secretary)\n\nWith such a seeming-scarcity of work for the Consulate, it would be sufficient to have only one man for it. But the Soviet Embassy has to have three men handling consular duties. The Consulate is open to visitors twice a week and only two hours a day. Even that is too much for an occasional person who desires a visa for visiting the USSR. However, in addition to their regular duties, the consuls have to arrange various matters relating to visiting Soviet cargo vessels, artistic and cultural groups, etc. On several occasions, they had to do many errands outside of their overt field of activity. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why, in many instances, they cannot be reached on the telephone. All three of them speak fluent Spanish and have no difficulty in getting around and acquiring Mexican friends. Given below are their respective character sketches.\n\nConsul LOGINOV is a rather recent arrival (two years in Mexico) and not very experienced in his job. However, he is learning the ropes quite rapidly and carries a lot of weight over the Embassy staff. KORUSKIN is the one who orders and\nto be sent for any visiting dignitary or a performer. He, apparently, scrutinizes and approves the names of doctors and dentists patronized by the Embassy personnel. Recently a Man on Duty said over the phone that LOGINOV had forbidden to be given out the address of a German dentist, whom the Soviets visited quite frequently before.\n\nLOGINOV is also in charge of making up a duty roster for appointing a Man on Duty who would be responsible for anything that took place at the Embassy on that particular day. No one, except the ambassador, seems to be exempt from that duty. On a few occasions LOGINOV encountered hostility to his arbitrary manner of making up the duty roster. Thus, when a Man on Duty called Nikolay Sergeyevich LOGINOV, Press Attach\u00e9 and a (former?) Cultural Officer, and told him that LOGINOV put his name down as the responsible Man on Duty for the Embassy for that day, LOGINOV said that he was very busy and let LOGINOV do it himself.\n\nObviously LOGINOV had made a number of secret enemies with his dictatorial manners and his disdainful, monotonous, and slow way of talking. His medium- to high-pitched voice sounds as if he is extremely bored with the world and does his interlocutor a favor just by talking to him.\n\nHis physical appearance seems to confirm that impression. A few newspaper photos show him as a youngish and rather unassuming individual with curly light-brown hair and with\na contemptuous smile on his lips. Unquestionably, his type of charm appeals to elderly ladies and LOGINOV is quite aware that he is attractive to the other sex. Without a doubt, he tries to capitalize on it and with his fluent Spanish probably tries to ensnare Mexican females. There is no indication that LOGINOV has tried anything of the sort with the Soviet wives. One of the reasons may be that he would not like his wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyeva, a very formidable woman indeed, to get wind of it. On the other hand, the Mexican women may seem to be more exotic and attractive to LOGINOV than his own countrywomen, in especial his wife, who is a large unattractive female.\n\nNevertheless, LOGINOV seems to be quite pleasant, with a nice cultured voice, and gets along with her husband well thanks to her good humour and social activity. She has been quite prominent in Kastkom work and in the children's summer camp. Shortly after their arrival, LOGINOV bought a tape-recorder for his wife for 115 dollars. Whether it was to be used for music, or other purposes, has not been determined.\n\nOnce in a while, LOGINOV goes on drunken sprees. Thus, on 12 February 1936, he and KOMAROV drove us to the Embassy gate at three a.m., pounded on the gate, blew their horn and had altercation with Stanislav Sergeyevich SIMONOV, who was on duty at that time.\nAnother very prominent trait of LOGINOV's character is his extreme chauvinism, bordering on jingoism. In reference to other nationalities, LOGINOV uses such deprecatory epithets as: \"Amerikashki\", \"Chinovka\", \"Nemchura\", etc.\n\nIt is doubtful if LOGINOV has any true friends. His sneering attitude is probably the reason for it. Although he made several errors in judgment in his work and social behaviour, LOGINOV by no means is a fool and should be kept in mind for any possible developments.\n\nVLADISLAV SERGEYEVICH KORUSKIN, vice consul (Attache), is a young man about thirty-three years of age, rather stocky, with blond wavy hair over a high forehead. A pair of heavy-rimmed glasses gives him the appearance of a very intellectual person. On the whole, KORUSKIN has the air of an easy-going fellow, who can make friends almost overnight. KORUSKIN and his wife are exceptionally close friends with Anatoly Vlasimirovich KIRABACH, employee of the Commercial Office, and his wife. Both families visit each other quite frequently.\n\nBesides occasional drinking bouts, KORUSKIN has not been known to practice any skirt-chasing, since his wife, Nina Nikolayevna, is not a back-licking woman herself, and both seem to be getting along nicely. M. KORUSKIN is a practicing physician at the Embassy and is quite in demand.\nwhenever any of the Soviets or his family is ill. KORUSKIN is also quite active in consular affairs and does most of the leg work for LOGINOV. He is also very active in Krestkom functions, where he is in charge of the Children's section. KORUSKIN is quite an energetic and pushy individual and can be quite rude and nasty at times. Undoubtedly, he is looking forward to being a full-fledged consul in time to come. The impression of KORUSKIN'S ambition and pushy trait in his character is intensified by the sound of his rapid and energetic but pleasant baritone voice.\n\nA curious fact should be cited here. Shortly after his arrival, KORUSKIN purchased a tape-recorder for 155 dollars or 70 dollars more than the one bought by his \"boss\" LOGINOV. Why?\n\nIt seems that in the future, KORUSKIN may slow down somewhat, but his inner drive and energy will nevertheless make him a more astute and skillful individual. His further progress should be watched with interest and caution.\n\nVladimir Ivanovich SHAKHVIN, vice-consul (third secretary) seems to be able to handle any job that comes along. Previously he was mentioned in an article in Cultural Affairs, then substitute for the Press attach\u00e9, and in written permission obtained various, but quite recently, while in the embassy, etc., in the office of the cultural attach\u00e9, etc.\nCONTRACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: 2-5777\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 27 July 1967\n\n1. I met Subject from 1522-1545 on 27 July in his room at the Del Paso Hotel. The next meeting is scheduled for 4 August at 1400 at the Del Paso. Subject will call on the 3d or 4th to give me his room number.\n\n2. Motion of Subject's Products. Subject will hold a private exhibition of his factory's latest lines of furniture and artifacts at the Hotel Presidente from 2-4 August, between 1000 and 2000. Sanborn's buyers will get a sneak preview on Tuesday, 1 August. Subject will consequently be in Mexico City from 31 July thru 4 August. He said he planned to send out invitations to all the Dibassos, but had not yet done so.\n\n3. Subject's GUN. Subject had neither seen nor heard from GUN.\n\n4. Col. Lawrence HUNTING. Subject's wife learned from Mrs. HIGGINS that the Colonel is due back in Mexico on 12 or 14 August.\n\n5. GROSHOV. GROSHOV dropped in on Subject at Subject's home in Cuernavaca about 1800 on Wednesday, 26 July. After having and having around for a few minutes, GROSHOV finally said that look, they were friends now and he wanted to ask Subject's advice on a matter. The doctor whom Subject had recommended for GROSHOV's son, GROSHOV said, had diagnosed the boy's stomach trouble as an advanced case of one of the worst strains of amoebas and had advised that the child be kept in bed and under observation. GROSHOV said the child was consequently being kept in bed at home in Mexico City.\n\nThe doctor, according to GROSHOV, had also expressed concern that the amoebas...\nSubject by the time I saw him to lead him to decide to tell CHERNOV, when he called him at the Embassy, to come to the Del Paseo (Subject's hotel) rather than the Presidente, where clients and acquaintances might from all his Soviet friends. I told Subject to handle it the way he wanted, but just not to bring me a restaurant bill for six ballerinas and their escorts. I told Subject that his near-term objective should be simply to establish as much rapport with CHERNOV as possible, with the view to finding out what kind of person he is and what he has on his mind. I said he should consider CHERNOV his main target for the present time and urged him to take advantage of any opportunity to get together with him alone.\n\n7. Subject apologized for his 200 story about his encounter with CHERNOV being a bit spotty, but he said he had a hard time understanding CHERNOV and wasn't able to follow everything he said. Subject said CHERNOV's Spanish is not good, he speaks very fast, and continually jumps from one subject to another. On the whole, Subject said, he had the impression CHERNOV was another nervous person and much less sure of himself than, for example, LOGINOV. Subject said that whereas he always felt he had to be on his guard with LOGINOV, he felt completely relaxed with CHERNOV and felt he dominated their relationship.\n\n8. Invitation to ANDREYEV SMALL PARTY. Subject gave me an invitation he had received in the mail to a despedida for ANDREYEV on the evening of 31 July. (The invitation was formally issued by KAZANTSEV. See attachment B.) Subject said that although he was going to be in Mexico City on the 31st, he expected to be completely tied up with preparations for the opening of his exhibit the next day and unless I had a special reason for wanting him to go to the reception, he was going to have to skip it. I told him that in view of the circumstances there was no need for him to go.\n1. I met Subject at the Del Paseo Hotel from 1350 to 1410 on 13 July and from 1945 to 1530 on 19 July. The next meeting is scheduled for the Del Paseo on 26 July. Subject will call in to arrange the time.\n\n2. Call on GOMARY. On 13 July Subject reported that he still hadn't been able to get through to GOMARY at the UAR Embassy, as the number GOMARY had given him was always busy. I gave Subject three additional numbers from the Diario Oficial and he tried all of them in my presence. He got through on the last one, managed to reach GOMARY, and spoke with him for about three minutes in English. The tone of the conversation tended to confirm GOMARY's claim that he is on very close and informal terms with GOMARY. Subject asked why GOMARY hadn't come to his home the previous two weekends. GOMARY excused himself by saying he had simply been too busy, but wanted very much to see Subject. Subject replied that he was in town at the Del Paseo and why didn't GOMARY come up to his hotel room that evening. GOMARY readily agreed to do so about 2030.\n\n3. Subject reported on 19 July that GOMARY had arrived at the hotel room about 2050 on 13 July and stayed for two hours. At the conclusion of their meeting, Subject invited GOMARY to come to his home in Guernica with his fianc\u00e9e on Sunday, 16 July. GOMARY agreed and visited Subject in Guernica from 1900-2000 on the 16th, but without his fianc\u00e9e, who he said was ill.\n\nThe hotel meeting on 13 July was by far the most profitable, as it gave Subject an opportunity to talk with GOMARY alone and at length over several drinks. The presence of Subject's wife on the 16th inhibited the conversation.\n\nSubject submitted the attached report (original given DCS) describing the\n\nThis... New P has been requested for GOMARY (pp. 1-3) P-10056\nP-235 (pp. 1-3) P-235 (pp. 1-3)\nP-11712 (pp. 3-4) P-235 (pp. 1-3)\nP-235 (pp. 3-4)\nhelp. His positive reaction to the idea of talking to \"the older\" American would seem to be confirmation of this.\n\n4. (p. 3) While no future meeting was scheduled, Subject and GORKOV parted on the 14th with the mutual understanding that Subject would get in touch with GORKOV either to discuss further GORKOV's business future or to arrange a meeting with Subject's American friend.\n\n5. (p. 3) Subject said it was his wife's understanding from Mrs. HERN\u00c1NDEZ that Mr. HERN\u00c1NDEZ would return to Mexico sometime during the week of 31 July.\n\n6. Subject said that he thought a sizable amount of money\u2014such as $1,200 U.S. per month, would be a vital, although not the primary, factor in recruiting GORKOV to remain in place. The prime incentive, in Subject's view, would obviously be the opportunity to help Egypt.\n\n4. Contact with the Soviets. GORKOV called Subject at home about 1000 on Sunday morning, 15 July. GORKOV said he was at the Soviet dacha in Guanajuato and that he and LOSKOV had gone to Subject's factory about 1700 on Saturday, the 15th, in order to present Subject with three bottles of vodka, but the guard had told them Subject had left. (Subject said he left the factory about 1630.) GORKOV said that LOSKOV had left Guanajuato because he was leaving for the USSR on vacation, but he (GORKOV) was still around and could Subject come over to the dacha. And oh, yes, GORKOV's child was sick with some form of dysentery and could Subject recommend a pediatrician? Subject said that despite the uncivilized hour, he got dressed and went over to the dacha about 1100. GORKOV was overflowing with friendship, kept urging everyone from the smallest child to the oldest woman to go up and say hello to Mr. REXER, and weekly presented Subject with one bottle of vodka.\nHe explained that they had drunk the other two bottles. About 1115 or so, Savitski began arriving at the desk in droves; Subject estimated 20 men and 15 women arrived in all. One of the newcomers to walk in was AMERINO, who seemed to be greatly surprised to see Subject and to learn that Subject and CHIKHOV knew each other. Subject stayed for about 40 minutes in all. CHIKHOV stayed with him the entire time and talked incessantly\u2014mostly about nothing and often so rapidly that Subject had a hard time understanding his faulty Spanish.\n\n5. In speaking of LOGINOV, CHIKHOV did say that LOGINOV is responsible for \"matters inside Mexico,\" while he (CHIKHOV) \"supervised Latin American countries outside Mexico.\" CHIKHOV did not elaborate on or give any hint as to what kind of \"matters\" he was talking about. As Subject was leaving, CHIKHOV urged him to come to the Embassy the next time he was in Mexico City and they would have a few drinks. CHIKHOV then said that as a matter of fact he was coming back to Guanajuato the next weekend and would like to see Subject then. Subject said to give him a call. (NOTE: Subject is unusually busy right now because of his approaching trip to the U.S.\u2014in about two weeks, but told me he would try to get together with CHIKHOV for a drink. I urged him to do this.) In all, Subject said he had the impression from CHIKHOV's general department that LOGINOV had told him to look after Subject while he (LOGINOV) was gone.\n\n6. Communist activity in the State of Morelos. Subject said that Cesar KER, the Jefe de Investigaciones of the Polic\u00eda Judicial in Guanajuato came by his home on the evening of 17 July to ask about a room-divider screen made of the turquoise mosaic material that Subject's factory specializes in. KER told Subject that he'd prefer \"not to pay too much for it,\" and Subject being Subject and also hoping we might make it up to him, obliged by offering him one my below cost. Delighted, KER stayed on awhile and\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Telecon with LIROBIN-2 on 12 July 1967\n\n1. LIROBIN-2 called the Station at 1345 on 12 July and left a message for me to call her. I reached her about an hour later. She said she had met LOGINOV at a party at the Indian Embassy on the evening of 11 July. During a brief conversation with him, he told her he was going to the Soviet Union on vacation on 16 July. He also said that PRIKHODKO was going to the USSR on vacation on 26 July. A minute later, he said PRIKHODKO was leaving on 29 July.\n\n2. Subject said he had had no other contact with any of the Soviets since March. (It will be recalled that she invited PRIKHODKO to dinner on 31 March, but he did not come.) Subject said she would call PRIKHODKO in a few days, mention that LOGINOV had said he was going on vacation, and invite him over before he left. She will let me know what happens.\n\nSB/L\n\nFile cc: P-11712\nP-2270\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\u041b\u0435\u0433\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430 (1772)\n\u041a\u0443\u043d\u0436\u0443\u043a (1735)\n\u041a\u043e\u043b\u043e\u043c\u044b\u0447\u043a\u0430 (1772)\nSB/12\n\nInfantry - the return of you can check if the sieves\n\n07/12 09:30 Station\nI checked up on\nVidella - she doesn't appear. Am checking\nwith Charlotte today\n\nP 11/7/2\nsee P 4805\n\nsee file\nJF/March 17, 1968\nSUBJECT: VALENTIN LOGUNOV\n\nMusic Hall de Moscow\n\nValentin invited our tennis group to be his guests at the final performance of the Ballets Russe at the Arena Mexico. The total group was about 15 persons.\n\nAlexandra not present. Val's wife, Alexandra, was not among the group. Val made no comment about why she was not there. No one else asked, that I know of.\n\nCzechs. Three Czechs were among the group. The introductions were badly handled and I was unable to learn the identity of the Czechs. Val and they spoke Spanish, not Russian or Czech.\n\nOdile Mauricee. (Spelling not certain for last name). Odile was invited by Val. She is Canadian, about 35, not unattractive, but careless in her dress. She struck me as being slightly masculine. She is a teacher of French in the mornings at the University of the Americas. In the afternoons she teaches at an Institute for Translators and Interpreters on Rio Tiber.\n\nWe were waiting for a mutual friend of Odile and Val, Rafael. He never arrived. I asked Odile who Rafael was. She explained that he was a teacher and her drinking buddy. Every afternoon around 4-5 she and Rafael can be found in the bar across the street from the institute.\n\nOdile had been drinking beer, probably quite a bit, prior to joining us that evening. She has lived in Mexico for 15 years. Her French, English and Spanish are fluent. She seemed to prefer French, though I felt her English was better.\n\nShe dressed oddly with white bobby socks. She did not fit in with the rest of the group. And I'm sure she didn't care. She seems to go to all Soviet embassy functions.\n\nShe might possibly be an intimate friend of Val's, if not a mistress, at least an occasional bed-partner. She commented (within the context of tennis, which was the topic of conversation at the moment) that one night Val told her he had to go home early (11 PM) because he was going to play in a tennis tournament the following day.\nSECRET\n\n11 March 1968\n\nSTAKE-OUT REPORT\n\nDATE: 8 March 1968\n\n1. I checked the Hotel Prince from 09:45 to 09:50 and noticed nothing unusual. I was outside the Hotel Alfer from 09:50 to 10:30 - nothing unusual. I then checked the Prince again at 10:40 for 5 minutes and noticed nothing.\n\n2. I checked the Hotel Prince at 16:50 and saw two women and two men (Soviets) talking in the lobby. Then at the Hotel Alfer from 16:55 to 17:40. Nothing except a man at 17:30 who looked very European. This man looked into the lobby of the hotel, then into the adjacent garage, then back to the hotel then out of the area. He definitely was not a local Soviet.\n\n3. At 17:40 I went back to the Hotel Prince to see if the entertainers were there. At 17:50 two men left who could be Soviets. I followed them to see if they were speaking Russian. I turned the corner from Luis Moya onto Juarez going east, I almost bumped into LOGINOV who was coming west on Juarez. I recognized him immediately and I felt that he recognized me. I continued along Juarez for a bit and then came back to see where LOGINOV went. I then stood on the other corner of Juarez and Luis Moya for 3 or 4 minutes. At this time I noticed a Soviet across Juarez (at the west side of the Juarez monument). He looked like KOLOMYAKOV but with too much hair. This Soviet was taking panoramic shots across Juarez. As his camera approached me, I stepped behind a kiosk. However, in the minutes before I noticed him, he could have been photographing me. A moment later I noticed LOGINOV about 10 yards from the Soviet. Both saw that I had spotted them. The Soviet with the camera then drifted west, photographed the Juarez monument and went further west. LOGINOV then went off in the same direction. I then went to report the above to CLASTONBURY at the Hotel Alfer after checking that I was not followed. I got there at 18:02.\n\n4. The Soviet had a small camera which appeared to be 8 mm. Thus I doubt if he got identifiable pictures of me.\n5. We checked out of the hotel at 18:30. At 18:40 we saw LOGINOV's car ahead of us on the Reforma headed toward the Soviet Embassy. Two men were in it whom I did not recognize.\n\n6. LILYRIC has LOGINOV and BARANOV leaving the Soviet Embassy in LOGINOV's car at 15:36 on 8 March. Neither were back by 18:30 when LILYRIC secured. I instantly recognized BARANOV's photos as the Soviet with the camera.\n\n7. Also per LILYRIC, LOGINOV left the Embassy in his car at 09:41 and returned on foot at 10:51. This was the period we were waiting for Subject. However he could not have seen me at the Hotel Prince since I left there at 09:50 the first time and at 10:40 the second time.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n| Sujetos | N\u00b0 Hora | OBSERVACIONES | Veh\u00edculos |\n|---------|---------|---------------|-----------|\n| Geat    | 20 0902 | que poco antes hablaba con Chem en el cuarto nuevo. |           |\n|         |         | se dirige al sur del Edificio. |           |\n| Onoha y Kola | 21 0907 | que ven\u00edan de la reja principal, platicando pasan por la terraza y se va al sur del Edificio. |           |\n| Klim    | 22 0911 | ven\u00eda de hablar con Solo en la Porter\u00eda, pasa por la terraza y se va al sur del Edificio. |           |\n| Shil    | 23 0958 | y unos trabajadores, pasan afuera del cuarto nuevo y se van al garaje. 1015 Ha. se dirigen a la puerta principal del Edificio. |           |\n| Zobi    | 24 0959 | que poco antes llegaron al Club, salen del cuarto nuevo y se dirigen a la reja principal por la cual salen del Club. |           |\n|         | 1014    | Zobi regresa al Club y vuelve acomarse al cuarto nuevo al parecer busca a alguien, despu\u00e9s sale del Club. |           |\n| M.Y.Kaz | 25 1003 | ven\u00edan de la Porter\u00eda, platicando pasan por la terraza y se van al sur del Edificio. |           |\n| L.Y.Tuch | 26 1042 | que platicaban frente al Recibidor, pasan por la terraza hacia el sur del Edificio. |           |\n|         | 27 1121 | entra al Club un Dodge Negro placas antiguas 464-AP. |           |\n| Log     | 28 1122 | en dicho veh\u00edculo ven\u00edan 2 Hombres y una Mujer (mexicanos) los recibe Log y juntos entran al Recibidor. |           |\n| Korn y Rine | 29 1200 | que ven\u00edan del Recibidor, pasan por la terraza hacia el sur del Edificio. |           |\nHenley C 53197\n13 February 1968\nLoganov + ? in black Dodge\nUnidentified people who were in black badge 464 AF\nPlaca No. 461-17 - Coche Dodge Particular - modelo 1966 dado de alta en Mayo de 1966 a nombre de IGNACIO MARTINEZ CARPINTERO con domicilio en las calles de Ar\u00edneos No. 128 colonia Iztapalapa, zona postal 13 D. F. motor 603334 sed\u00e1n.\n\nAtentamente K-10\n1. Agent: LINEALM/1\n2. Date and Site of Meeting: 12/2/68, Tecali Bar, Mariano Escobedo, 1700.\n3. Date and Site of Next Meeting: Same place, same time, 19/2/68.\n4. Administrative: No administrative matters discussed.\n5. Information/Instructions Passed to Agent:\n\nRoston advised LINEALM/1 to continue his same line with his friend Valentin Loguinov. He agreed with LINEALM/1 that since Loguinov did not bring up the matter of his \"boss\" since his first reference to it at 27/1/68 at the French Club, Loguinov probably has not given further thought to the matter. (Loguinov had two opportunities to bring the matter up again with LINEALM/1 and did not do so).\n\nRoston also advised LINEALM/1 to continue to push LINEALIC/1 into the PHI but agreed that in the light of the current uncertainty as to whom might emerge as the future leader, LINEALIC/1 should not attach himself too firmly to any one individual, but rather await the outcome of the 27/2/68 convention.\n\n6. Information/Reports Given to Case Officer by Agent:\n\nLINEALM/1 gave Roston his reports 050/JF and 051/JF, attached herewith, together with the latest LINEALIC/1 report passed to LINEALM/1 through the drop.\n\nWallace B Roston\n\n[Signature]\n\nCopies Made\n\n[Signature]\nFebruary 7, 1943, 1645-1845 hours.\nFrench Club\n\nInto for tennis. Val was 45 minutes late for our tennis match. I take this as meaning that he no longer suspects me of working for the company, or at least his suspicions have been sufficiently allayed to permit him to risk missing a contact with me. He obviously is not willing with my answers to his earlier questions.\n\nI am no longer a target. When we talk now, I have the definite feeling that he has neither thought at all about our meeting in advance, nor has he been briefed in advance by his people. Our conversation is spontaneous, frank, and frequently boys down.\n\nHeating about Gloria Pinion, Val seemed genuinely bored about Gloria. She is not young, but definitely attractive, athletic, sympathetic, and has organized several tennis groups, always careful to include Val. He seems completely unappreciative of her efforts in his behalf.\n\nVal asked no leading questions and made no provocative remarks about our policy.\n\nTalking about personnel cuts at U.S. embassy. Val asked if it is true that 10 percent of the personnel would return to the U.S. He asked if I knew anyone personally who would be affected. I stated that the only person I really knew at all was Ruth Ortega. I asked that the embassy wouldn't possibly due without her. Val showed considerable interest in Ortega and our contact. I brought her along for tennis so that I could have that contact with Ortega for business not social, and that she probably was a little too old for tennis.\n\nGirls. Val was still on the girl phase. He hoped I could recommend some American girls to him. He asked me if I was interested in girls. I admitted that I was but didn't like to mix them with other activities. I said I liked tennis here, chess there, and girls there, but not mixing them. I then quoted an old Russian song: \"Pierwsze dziecko, pierwsze dziecko, sza-\"... I don't know the rest.\"\nFebruary 10, 1966, 2100-0200 hours\nHone of Gloria and Pogo Pinto\n\nTo this dinner, Gloria has organized a tournament. Prior to the first match she invited all the participants to a cocktail-dinner in her home.\n\nVal late. Val was late, explaining that his wife had a doctors appointment. He also said that he had spent the day at a party in honor of the ambassador who soon will leave.\n\nVal might leave. Val was asked by a provocative German if he too would soon be leaving. Val explained how most people leave after three years, or when the ambassador they have been serving leaves. He said there was a possibility that he might leave, but he refused to express his opinion about such a likelihood.\n\nParty much on Val. Everyone at the party seemed to want to kid Val, or, in the case of the German, come as close as possible to insulting him. I refrained from this attack. I asked Val if he were always treated as sort of a novelty at parties, with people attacking him. He said no, but that most parties were diplomatic or his own Soviet community. He explained the Germans behavior as typical of the short-sighted, ill-informed and vulgar Soviets.\n\nAlexandra. Alexandra spoke little during the evening and needed help from Val frequently to explain that was said in Spanish. However, she seems very intelligent and very calm.\n1 February 1968\n\nTO : Chief, Cuba\nFROM : C/SB\nSUBJECT: Valentin LOGINOV (P-11712)\n\n1. LIMITED reports that on 18 January 1968 LOGINOV entered the Soviet Embassy at 17:11 in his own car (19 DA). He was still in the Embassy at 19:00 when LIMITED went off duty.\n\n2. LILYRIC was not working on 18 January.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n1. A check at the building confirms that Subject lives at Ignacio Esteva 21 - apt. 2. Near the door bell at the main entrance in the slot corresponding to apt. 2 Subject's name appears: V.S. LOGINOV.\n\n2. The building is quite new and it has 5 floors. The 1st (ground) floor houses the Instituto de cronometrologia, and on the 2nd 3rd floor there are 2 apt per floor. The building has no garage.\n\n3. Apparently there is no portero in the building because there is no bell for the portero. The \"interphone\" enables tenants to identify visitors and open the door electrically.\nLogins ordered\nfor for\nGraciano Esteva\n# 21/2\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: BEGABER\n\nDATES OF MEETINGS: 11 and 19 January 1968\n\n1. I met Subject in his room at the Del Paseo Hotel from 1415-1545 on 11 January and from 1415-1515 on 19 January. The next meeting will be arranged by telephone.\n\n2. The Soviets. As of 19 January, Subject had not seen or talked with any of the Soviets since his telephone conversation with LOGINOV on 28 September. Subject did, however, receive a Christmas card from LOGINOV. With my agreement, Subject sent inexpensive gifts along with Christmas cards to LOGINOV and CHEYKHOV, but they weren't delivered until the week of 15 January. Subject explained that before Christmas, he assigned his salesman the job of delivering a score of Christmas gifts, including LOGINOV'S and CHEYKHOV'S, around town, but shortly after Christmas, found that the salesman had not delivered any of them. This discovery caused Subject to fire the salesman, who had been increasingly derelict in performing his job over the past few months and who, Subject had recently learned, had begun taking dope. Subject consequently wrote \"better-late-than-never\" notes on the cards accompanying the undelivered gifts and had his new salesman deliver them. I have instructed Subject to leave the initiative for the next contact up to the Soviets.\n\n3. Salim COHARY. Subject ran into COHARY on the street one day during the first week of January. COHARY seemed delighted\n\nFile cc: P-6235 (p.1)  P-10,056 (p.1-2)\nP-11712 (p.1)  P-9097\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\nP-11712\nSUBJECT: Policeman recruited by LOGINOV\n\n1. This case started about fifteen months ago and the only info we know of is the ROSETTLE couple that LOGINOV asked the policeman to check on. Is the case active? What requirements are being given to the policeman by LOGINOV? Are any Americans involved? Have any other Soviets been involved? LOGINOV specialises in US operations. He may be giving the policeman assignments in support of his US operations.\n\n2. Please check this with 12 and 4 and let us know what the status is.\n\nTks.\n\n17 Jan 68\n\n[Signature]\n\nOrig to JKB (fn 11712-8)\n1-50-6-614\nP file on LOGINOV P-11712\n\nSECRET\n\n17 Jan 68\n\n[Signature]\n\nP-11712\nMiguel Juan Betancur\nUnigualan cit\nNature Russ employed Stephens-\nAdamsan de Mejico.\nWife Teaches Repas at Shero-\nAmer Univ.\n3. V. 1967\n\nLet me tell you, sir, the answer is yes.\n\nHe knows a little of care, believes in \"dead.\"\nCOS\nC/3B\n\nI hold this because we sent 4 TEMPE-8 a menu in new tourist office and didn't want to make too much of a good thing.\n\nDr\n24 August 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: COS\nFROM: C/ SB\nSUBJECT: Policeman Recruited by LOGINOV\n\n1. In reviewing LOGINOV's SPR which WEENING has just completed, I note that LOGINOV recruited this policeman 18 months ago and that his first requirement was on the BOESTROM couple. At that time we gave LITEMPO-8 traces on LOGINOV saying that he was a dangerous KGB officer. LITEMPO-8 subsequently mentioned that the case was continued and that he, himself, was directing it.\n\n2. If you think that LITEMPO-8 will cooperate, I would like to know the following about this case:\n\n(a) Is it still active?\n\n(b) Did the policeman pass info to LOGINOV on the BOESTROM couple? If so, what? Was there any follow-up?\n\n(c) What type of requirements has LOGINOV given to the policeman? Are any Americans involved?\n\n(d) Have any other Soviets been involved with this case?\n\n(e) Who is handling him while LOGINOV is in the USSR on vacation (he left Mexico on 16 July)?\n\n3. As a basis for discussing this case you could mention that we are especially concerned about LOGINOV because he specializes in US operations. He tried to recruit a chauffeur at the Embassy and tried to develop a female Foreign Service Officer (true). You might also say he is running a sensitive case into the US (false). Thus many of his requests to the policeman may be in support of American operations although this would not necessarily be apparent. Therefore we would like to know what he is asking for. Our traces would help both ourselves and LITEMPO-8, etc.\n4. Depending on LITEMPO-8's reaction, you might even suggest that LITEMPO-8 take advantage of LOGINOV's absence from Mexico in the USSR to request Relaciones not to give him a new visa because of his intelligence activity as detailed by LITEMPO-8.\n\nHe has been back for a month or more.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nDistribution:\nK - P-11712\n1 - 5Q-6-91/2\nMEMO FROM LEGAL ATTACHE\n\nDATE: 10 JANUARY 1968\n\nSUBJECT: INSTITUTO DE INTERCAMBIO CULTURAL MEXICANO-RUSO, MORELIA (MEXICAN-RUSSIAN INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL EXCHANGE, MORELIA) (105-1016 - 1/10/68)\n\nCLASSIFICATION: SECRET\nXXX GUF note: BIRTHDAY COULD BE EITHER KOLONYAKOV's OR MIROSHNIKOV's. I HAVE DIFFERENT DATES OF BIRTH IN JAN 1926 FOR BOTH THOUGH. VLADIMIR KLINOV KORNYUSHIN AND SOLOMATIN WERE ALSO BORN 1928 (DAY AND MONTH UNKNOWN). ANYONE'S GUESS IS AS GOOD AS MINE.\n\nGUF\n\nOut to 11-09-60 at 1155. LOGOVA asks MALYSHINA for IVANOVA and asks her when did they come back. Last night. Well, they are gathering tomorrow evening at the Embassy to celebrate someone's birthday and there will be a lot of people and they have to present him with a gift. Let's make a collection and buy him a silver pitcher and two glasses. /long discussion/. Alright, but let's keep NATASHA as a teacher of English for the kids. Final\n\nP-11712\nP-1612\nP-497\nP-6518\n\n156055\n11 ERE. 1933\nSECRET\n\n11 January 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE FILE\n\nSUBJECT: Visit of Unidentified Woman to Soviet Embassy grounds\n\n1. LICALLA reported that at 1203 hours on Tuesday 9 January 1968, an unidentified woman, described by LICALLA as a \"Northamerican type\" entered the Soviet Embassy. This woman entered the receiving room and came out into the courtyard of the Soviet Embassy grounds at 1206 hours. While in the garden (courtyard) she spoke to Yuri S. CHERNISH (P-13042), Vladimir Sergeyevich KORUSHEKIN (P-11707) and to Vladimir Agafonovich DOLGOV (P-9774). From 1215 hours until 1226 hours, when she again entered the reception room in the company of Valentin S. LOGINOV (P-11712), she spoke in the courtyard to DOLGOV. LICALLA reported that this unidentified woman departed the Soviet Embassy at 1252 hours.\n\n2. Attached for Vladimir A. DOLGOV's (P-9774) file are LICALLA photos of this woman taken with DOLGOV. (FOR WOPIRM USE ONLY).\n\nGrace H. FARMILANT\nSB\n\nFILES\nP-9774 w/att\nP-13042 w/o/att\nP-11707 w/o/att\nP-11712 w/o/att\nSECRET\n\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT : LICOZY-5\n\nDATE OF MEETING : 5 January 1968\n\n1. I met Subject at the Koala from 09:15 to 09:50. I will call him in the week of 15 January to arrange delivery of his liquor.\n\n2. Subject gave me the travel info on IVANOV which has already been forwarded to San Jose.\n\n3. Subject reported that LOGINOV visited him a few days before Christmas bearing 6 bottles of Vodka, red and black caviar and a lacquered box. He mentioned that NIKOFOROV and KORMUSIKIN had had a car accident. Also that NECHIPORENKO had arrived but that either he or someone in his family had been sick ever since arrival.\n\n4. LOGINOV used the occasion to renew the old pitch. He said that with the celebration of the 50th anniversary everybody is contributing. What would LICOZY-5 contribute? Subject then gave LOGINOV a pair of sun glasses with a built in transistor radio (as a Christmas gift). LOGINOV said he meant not personal favors but something for the cause. He then asked Subject to spot a Mexican employee of the American Embassy. Subject laughed at him and repeated all the old arguments about not working for the Scvs. He told LOGINOV that, if he wanted to be friends, then stop bringing up these old requests.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - P-2712\nL - P-11712\nSECRET\n\n5 January 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Berta NAVARRO, Member of Fuerzas Armadas de America Latina (FALA)\n\nSOURCE: LICOZY-5\n\n1. Source stated that Subject is the sister-in-law of his old friend Lic. Juan SALDA\u00d1A who used to be in Relaciones and is now Sub Director General of Accion Social of the Departamento del D.F. Subject is the sister of SALDA\u00d1A's wife, Fernanda and is 24 years old.\n\n2. A few weeks ago SALDA\u00d1A brought Subject to Source asking the latter to give Subject a job. Subject told Source that she had formerly worked at UNAM and had been arrested in a group which had bombed the Bolivian Embassy in Mexico. She was held and interrogated but because of SALDA\u00d1A's influence, she was released after 2 months without charges. However, the police refused to let her work at UNAM and told her that they would have to approve any job she undertook. She still has to report to the police every 3 days. Subject told Source her story because she knew that the police would check with him.\n\n3. Subject told Source the following about herself and the FALA:\n\n   a. The FALA has 76,000 members.\n\n   b. Her superiors told her that the PCM tipped off the Mexican authorities about those involved in the bomb throwing. The PCM did this because terrorism is against their line and harms the peaceful diffusion of Communism.\n\n   c. The FALA works on the cell basis so that each member knows only a few people. However, she worked as liaison between Mexico and Poza Rica and knows more members there. The FALA members in Poza Rica are Pemex workers.\n\n   d. The FALA is financed by the Cuban Embassy.\n4. Valentin S. LOGINOY (P-11721) came into the office a few days after Subject started work and asked about her (she is replacing Miriam AVILA Katz). Source gave LOGINOY a brief resume of the above. LOGINOY's only comment was \"they are nuts.\"\n\n5. There are no traces on Subject, but there are several cards on SALDANA.\n\nFrancis J. COIGNE\n\nFile:\nOrig - 50-9-8\n1 - P-2712\n1 - P-11712\nDate: November 25, 1967\n\nTo: Mr. Henry Dearborn\n    Deputy Chief of Mission\n\n    Mr. Wallace W. Stuart\n    Counselor for Political Affairs\n\nFrom: Nathan L. Ferris\n    Legal Attach\u00e9\n\nSubject: INSTITUTO DE INTERCAMBIO CULTURAL MEXICANO-RUSO\n        (MEXICAN-RUSSIAN INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL EXCHANGE),\n        GUADALAJARA, JALISCO\n        105-367 (11-23-67)\n\nThis document is for the use of your agency only and neither it nor its contents should be further distributed without appropriate authorization.\n\nEnclosed are two memoranda, dated and captioned as above, which may be of interest to you.\n\nEnclosures (2)\n\nCC: Mr. Winston M. Scott (Encs.-2)\n    Army Attach\u00e9 (Encs.-8)\n\n    American Consulate General, Guadalajara (Encs.-2)\n    (Through Counselor for Consular Affairs)\n\nGROUP 1\nExcluded from automatic downgrading and declassification\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nSource: T-1\n\nAugust 3, 1937\n\nMembers of the IICM at Guadalajara held a picnic for visitors at the II Soviet Cultural Week at Chapala, Jalisco, on August 3, 1937, lasting from 1:30 p.m. until 1:00 p.m. Noted among the visitors were the following:\n\n- Professor ADELINA ZELENSKA\n- SOLOI ZELENSKY\n- VALENTIN LONCHHOV\n- STANISLAV INDIA\n- SOLOI ZELENSKY\n- VLADIMIR LUCHEV\n- Professor ADELINA LONCHHOV\n- STANISLAV CHYCHY\n\nThe II Soviet Cultural Week at Guadalajara, Jalisco, began on August 7, 1937, with a reception at the IICM office with about 700 persons present. Noted among the persons present were the following: SOLOI ZELENSKY, SOLOI ZELENSKY, VLADIMIR LUCHEV, Professor ADELINA ZELENSKA, STANISLAV CHYCHY, STANISLAV INDIA, and VALENTIN LONCHHOV. A cocktail party was held after the inauguration ceremonies, and many Russian and other Iron Curtain country magazines were given to the public.\n\nSource: T-1\n\nAugust 12, 1937\n\nOn the night of August 10, 1937, Russian documentary type movies were shown to about 110 persons at the Social Security Theatre at Guadalajara. These movies were sponsored by the IICM.\n\nSource: T-1\n\nAugust 21, 1937\n\nOn the night of August 11, 1937, about 50 persons were entertained by EMILIO YAMAG and LUIZ LOCA playing the violin and the piano. This event was sponsored by the IICM as part of the II Soviet Cultural Week.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\nSUBJECT: Operational Meeting with LINGCHI/1 (P-117/1)\n\nDATE OF MEETING: 24 November 1937\n\n1. The undersigned met with LINGCHI/1 on 24 November from 1200 hours to 1545 hours at an in-town safe house. From 1205 to 1245 the meeting was conducted in L/1's car inasmuch as the safe house was occupied during this period. The next meeting is scheduled for the same safe house on 8 December at 1500 hours.\n\n2. The following meetings between L/1 and the below named Soviets occurred during the months of October and November:\n\n   a. Classes of 3 October: BEREZIN (P-9037) and GONCHARENKO (P-9379) studied on this day from 1530 to 1700. KAZANTSEV (P-860) studied from 1700 to 1800.\n\n   b. Classes of 5 October: In the morning of this day, an unidentified Soviet phoned Mrs. ROCKETT (L/1 was out of the house) and requested her to inform L/1 that there would be no classes that day. No reason was given, either then or subsequently, for this cancellation.\n\n   c. Classes of 10 October: BEREZIN & Goncharenko studied from 1530 to 1700. KAZANTSEV came at 1610, interrupting class, to pick up several pocket books which he had previously asked L/1 to procure for him. L/1 selected them from his own library. KAZANTSEV stated that he did not care what subjects were chosen; he wanted them only to improve his reading ability. He did mention, however, that he preferred not to read books which had either violence or pornography as their central theme. L/1 brought a book on science fiction (Kaz. was not particularly interested in this), a book on ballet, and a book on the TSI which KAZANTSEV seemed very interested. KAZANTSEV said that he would not be taking class today and that they would all discontinue classes after 12 Oct. KAZANTSEV stated that he was supposed to take his vacation from 12 Nov. and 14 November. Signed: P-117/1\n\nP-117/1\n\nCOPIES MADE\nand concluded that they could be too busy with the upcoming October 15th anniversary. L/1 noted that although BEDIN had not expressed interest in the books given him in 1967, he was interested in obtaining books of a geographical nature. BEDIN has previously remarked that he liked a good spy story and that during a 1966 layover in Brussels, he (BEDIN) sought out and enjoyed seeing some old movies there.\n\n4. Classes of 12 October: (Last class until 14 November).\n\nBEDIN and GO BEDIN studied from 1530 to 1700. MAMIN did not study.\n\nBEDIN told L/1 to come to the Embassy near the end of October in order to pick up his invitations for the 7 November anniversary. L/1 mentioned that he might be going to the States during the last of October. BEDIN asked L/1 to bring him two 7 inch recording tapes and two 5 inch reel tapes. BEDIN commented that \"another friend\" had previously brought him some tapes. This was the first time BEDIN had ever requested L/1 to perform any personal favor.\n\n3. On 12 October L/1 drove to the Embassy to pick up his invitations. L/1 met by BEDIN who gave him two invitations. L/1 commented that he was not now planning to return to US. BEDIN stated that he did not need the requested tapes himself as a \"friend\" had purchased some Grundig tapes for him while in the States.\n\n4. On 7 November L/1 attended the Soviet celebration. L/1 was not accompanied by his wife since he had to teach classes that evening and therefore stayed only from 1700 to 1830 hours. By his own testimony, L/1 consumed some 14 shots of vodka during this period, yet managed to teach two classes that evening. L/1 agreed that the classes were conducted in a voluble spirit. L/1 was met at the gate by CORITZ, who then passed him on to LEGINSKY. BEDIN commented that he was still interested in possibly hiring Enrique UTERRA as an English language teacher for his son. In the reception line L/1 met MAMIN and wife, who introduced him to the new military attach\u00e9 (name forgotten by L/1) with whom he had an animated\nconversation in Spanish. The military attach\u00e9 spoke very good Spanish and indicated to L/1 that he would probably begin to study English within the next few months. The attach\u00e9's English was very poor. L/1 then met GOLYCO and had the usual cocktail sherry with them.\n\nBENEN and GOLYCO, in turn, introduced L/1 to KU GOLYCO, allegedly a representative of the \"Ministry of Culture\" of the USSR who, in that capacity, was accompanying the Soviet Ballet on Ice tours. GOLYCO spoke in fluent English with L/1 commenting that he had studied English in the USSR. His home is Kiev. L/1's impression of GOLYCO was that GOLYCO did not appear to be the \"cultural type\". GOLYCO was very imprecise as to his actual role and duties with the Ice Ballet. GOLYCO's dress was somewhat haphazard and he impressed L/1 as somewhat unrefined and a heavy. GOLYCO, according to L/1, is about 40-45 years of age, 6'1\" in height, 160-165 pounds, grey hair and thin-faced (angular).\n\nL/1, emboldened by a few cocktails, requested two tickets for the Ice Ballet from GOLYCO. GOLYCO politely acquiesced and said he would get two of the best seats. L/1 was then introduced to the assistant director and the director of the orchestra by GOLYCO who translated in a seemingly suave manner. With this show of friendliness on the part of the Soviets, L/1 KHN decided to invite them all to his house for a buffet supper within the next few weeks. GOLYCO and his associates were visibly pleased and L/1 also extended the invitation to BENEN. BENEN said he would try and make all the arrangements and a tentative date of 9 or 10 December was agreed upon. L/1 was then introduced to the Armenian Ambassador, GALTACHYAN, with whom he conversed in English. GALTACHYAN has good English facility. GALTACHYAN appeared to be on good terms with a number of Soviets and knew BENEN quite well. GALTACHYAN is tall and thin, pronounced Slavonic features, and possesses a strong, forceful, dynamic personality. L/1 and GALTACHYAN had a friendly talk and when parting GALTACHYAN left open\nthe possibility of meeting together specially. As 2/1 was leaving the\noffice, they exchanged a few words, and then 2/1 walked over to 1/1 with whom he proposed to meet, and they\ndrank to the USSR.\n\n5. Beginning with 15 November, the following classes were held:\n\na. Classes of 15 November: GONCHARNO arrived 10 minutes\nlate for classes at 1530. He informed 1/1 that neither KAZANTSEV or\nBERIN would be available for classes that day. Then, apparently as an\nafter-thought, GONCHARNO commented that he would not attend classes\neither.\n\nb. Classes of 16 November: 1/1 met BERIN who gave him two\ntickets for the Ice Ballet. BERIN and GONCHARNO entered at 1530. At\n1620 KAZANTSEV entered and interrupted the class to announce that he would\nnot study that day. Irritatedly BERIN wheeled around and told KAZANTSEV\nvery explicitly that he should remain and study. To this KAZANTSEV replied\nin English, \"See the pressure my Chief puts on me!\" It was quite apparent\nthat BERIN was in charge of the language lessons and that KAZANTSEV was\nseemingly very hesitant to defy BERIN's challenge. (C.O. note: This\nmay signify that BERIN's rank is considerably more than a Second Secretary\nwithin the internal organization of the Embassy). KAZANTSEV stated that\nhe wanted to take a week's leave, but in deference to BERIN's wishes\nKAZANTSEV finally remained during the rest of the class, although his\npresence was a somewhat disruptive factor. GONCHARNO, who had remained\nsilent for the most part, became somewhat bored and dispirited by KAZANTSEV's\nantics and therefore exited the class at 1640 - some 20 minutes before the\nend of the lessons. BERIN and KAZANTSEV remained and 1/1 had them ask\neach other questions in English - an exercise which KAZANTSEV enjoyed in\nthat his English is superior to BERIN's. However, BERIN rose to the\noccasion, conducted himself in a fine manner, and there ensued a lively\nexchange of answers and questions on non-controversial topics.\nUpon departing, KORNIUSHIN stated that he would join the KGB in November and would join the KGB in November. He identified a new unit in KGB, KGB, (Valentin Mikhailovich), a second a security in the KGB.\n\nc. Classes of 21 November: KORNIUSHIN and GORSHKIN studied from 1530 to 1700. At 1700 KORNIUSHIN entered together with KORNIUSHIN. KORNIUSHIN possesses good, fluent English although his grammar is quite rough. He speaks with a decidedly British accent. LOR KORNIUSHIN commented that he had served in Burma (approximately from 1962-65) and more recently (1965-67) had been working in Moscow. KORNIUSHIN is married and stated that he had been in Mexico some four months. KORNIUSHIN appears to be between 35-40 years of age, blonde hair, trim, athletic appearing, approx. 6 feet tall and weighing between 165-170 pounds.\n\nd. Classes of 23 November: KORNIUSHIN and GORSHKIN studied from 1530 to 1700. GORSHKIN commented that his wife and two children were ill with the flu. KORNIUSHIN and KORNIUSHIN arrived at 1700 and studied until 1800. During the lesson a slight argument or difference of opinion arose between KORNIUSHIN and KORNIUSHIN over what the official Soviet position was during the 1954 Cyprus crisis. (L/1 could not recall the substance over what they differed on). L/1 then queried them as to what the official position was on the present crisis. They both replied that they didn't know as yet what the position of the USSR was on the current Cyprus dispute. The exchange reflected the obtuse, somewhat dogmatic, character of KORNIUSHIN. L/1 characterized KORNIUSHIN as possessing very strong and fixed ideas. KORNIUSHIN did not appear to be swayed by KORNIUSHIN's position and spoke openly and forcefully to him. Upon departing L/1 spoke with LOGINOV regarding the possible employment of an English teacher for LOGINOV's children. LOGINOV commented that a Soviet English-speaking teacher employed the new teaching his son. L/1 had recently met a NEW JOURNAL through William (W) FENT, Director of the British Institute.\nMr. Johnson, a British citizen, is the one in seeking the position.\n\nAlthough I/1 was not keen to hire him, he was interested in him during\nthe interview and wanted to send a strong recommendation as\nfor Johnson's credentials. (Johnson is a lawyer by profession and is\nmarried). I/1 became more interested in Johnson and told I/1\nthat he might be able to use his services in two or three months.\n\nThe undersigned instructed I/1 to obtain more bio information (full name,\netc.) on Johnson and to monitor the progress of Johnson in attempting\nto obtain a teaching position at the University.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\n\n[Date]\nL/1 stated that he preferred to study English alone rather than in a class or with a tutor. L/1 commented that he would be required to take his English exam in March in the near future (time not specified) and that he would need to prepare for it. L/1 stated that he wanted to \"maintain his 25% bonus\" by passing this English exam. L/1 views English as somewhat of a bumpkin, not particularly intelligent, but a plodder; and a loner in his relationships with others - as far as L/1 can discern. L/1 was not able to attend classes as he was to accompany a group from the international diplomatic community on a special tour to the Museum. L/1 also spoke briefly with L/1. L/1 asked L/1 if he would have time to teach his son (3 or 5 years old). English, in the company of another Soviet boy, between the hours of 1700 and 2000 any day of the week. L/1 stated that these hours were impossible for him, but might be able to arrange another time. L/1 said that he would give this consideration. L/1 then began talking of his love for sports and his background as a former judge in Olympic skiing as well as refereeing various other sports including tennis. This was all discussed against the backdrop of the Olympics. L/1's English is good, although not as fluent as L/1's. L/1's only problem seems to be a lack.\n\nLIROCKET-1 Contact Report\n31 Oct. (16 Nov. 67)\n1.- Don Manifestos de entrada del barco Almac\u00e9n Occidental \"LUSITANIA\" que entre al Puerto de Veracruz, el d\u00eda 3 de Nov./67, procedente de Almac\u00e9n Occidental y sali\u00f3 de este puerto el d\u00eda 7 de Nov./67. Habiendo dejado una probadora para el Sr. Valent\u00edn Hern\u00e1ndez, de la Embajada Rusa en M\u00e9xico, D.F. Una caja de efectos personales, para el Sr. Dimitri D. Prugov, de la Embajada Rusa en M\u00e9xico, D.F.\n\n2.- Tres copias fotost\u00e1ticas del cable puesto desde la habana, Cuba a los pos y linos, S.A., avis\u00e1ndole de la llegada del barco cubano ULYSSE al Puerto de Progreso, para que sean atendidos, este barco entre el d\u00eda 7 de Nov./67 a Progreso, Yucat\u00e1n. Esta informaci\u00f3n se lo pase por velofono al Sr. Miguel, el d\u00eda 8 de Nov./67, a las 8 y 45 p.m., por haberse nos pasado el dato directamente desde Veracruz.\n\n3.- Manifestos de Consignataria de Nuevos Muebles, diciendo que el barco de nacionalidad ruso \"LENINSKY KOMSOMOL\", sali\u00f3 el d\u00eda 4 de Nov./67, del Puerto del Mariel, Provincia de \"Inar del R\u00edo, Cuba, en la otra, habiendo llegado al Puerto de Veracruz, a cargar m\u00e1s el d\u00eda 8 de Nov. de 1967.\n\n4.- Lista de tripulantes del barco ruso \"LENINSKY KOMSOMOL\" que entre el d\u00eda 8 de Nov./67, procedente del Mariel, Cuba.\nNovember 2, 1967, 1130 hours.\n\nCasual contact. Logunov was entering the French Club as I was leaving. He asked me to stay long enough to play a couple of sets of tennis with him. I had to decline due to previous commitments. We both agreed to look for each other for tennis some day after the 50th anniversary celebrations next week.\n\nNovember 11, 1967, 1100-1200 hours.\nSource: Direct. At French Club.\n\nTennis. Logunov and I played doubles with two women. Everyone seemed to permit themselves to tease Logunov about the embassy's celebration of the 50th anniversary and about the numerous requests that everyone seemed to have made for gifts and souvenirs from Russia. Val has signed up for a tournament of mixed doubles which begins tomorrow. I too have been invited and accepted.\n\nAttitude. Logunov seemed very friendly and anxious to continue our friendship. His motives, however, seem strictly for tennis.\n\nCompanion. Earlier I saw Logunov playing tennis with a rather tall and heavy-set person who left when Logunov approached my wife and me. Later, when dressed, this person passed by to say goodbye to Logunov, in Russian. He is obviously an embassy type.\n\nNovember 12, 1967.\nSource: Direct. At French Club.\n\nLogunov played tennis with still another member of his embassy. We did not have an opportunity to talk on the courts. We did see each other in the showers. He showed great interest in playing soon and said he would call me to arrange the date and time. He joked that I should bring some of my friends from the embassy, all of whom are CIA. We could have an international tournament. I told him that none of my friends played tennis. He misinterpreted and thought I said that I knew no one at the embassy\u2014he looked disappointed. I corrected him and said that I did indeed know embassy people, but that none played tennis and that I doubted very much if my friends were CIA, FBI or anything else.\nLICALLA- 2 DECEMBER 1967\n\nANOTHER INTERESTING KGB TRIO?\n\nValentin LOGINOV, Oleg NECHIPORENKO (arrived PCS 29 NOV 1967),\nand Pavel YATSKOV, whom NECH is replacing.\n\nFile: F-11712\n| TO | ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | DATE FORWARDED | OFFICERS INITIALS |\n|----|----------|---------------|----------------|-------------------|\n| 1  | 5R/X/WH  | 24 Aug 1972   |                |                   |\n| 2  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 3  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 4  | 5R/BIC   | 24 Aug 1972   | 01 Sep 1972    | DK                |\n| 5  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 6  | 5R/RIS   | 23 Aug 1972   |                |                   |\n| 7  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 8  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 9  |          |               |                |                   |\n| 10 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 11 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 12 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 13 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 14 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 15 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 16 |          |               |                |                   |\n| 17 |          |               |                |                   |\n\nIt is the responsibility of the 5330 area desk to screen field files for duplication and incorporate in CS Headquarters files, per Chief, 53.\n**DISPATCH**\n\n**SECRET**\n\n**TO:**\nChief, Soviet Bloc Division\n\n**CC:**\nChief, Western Hemisphere Division\n\n**FROM:**\nActing Chief of Station, Mexico City\n\n**SUBJ:**\nO Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-285412)\n\n**ACTION REQUESTED:**\nMicrofilm\n\n---\n\nForwarded herewith are the Station's Personality File on Subject for inclusion into his Headquarters 201-File. The file has been purged of all Headquarters correspondence.\n\n---\n\n**Distribution:**\n\n- C/SHU w/atts n/v.\n- C/SHU w/o/atts.\n\nFile not forwarded directly to SHU/WH by 1944/58 on 22 Aug 72.\n\n---\n\n**IMPDET**\n\n---\n\n1 att. (2 att. filed 201-file)\n\n---\n\n**CS COPY**\n\n---\n\n**CROSS REFERENCE TO**\n\n**DISPATCH NUMBER AND RECIPIENT**\n\n**DATE**\n\n16 August 1972\n\n---\n\n**CLASSIFICATION**\n\n**SECRET**\n\n---\n\n**NO FILE NUMBER**\n\n201-285412\n| X-REF. | SYMR. NUMBER | DOC. DATE | DOC. FILED IN |\n|--------|--------------|-----------|---------------|\n| 201-0285412 | HMMA-35637 | 16 MAR 70 | 201-0789963 |\n\nThe above document(s) are cross-referenced to the 201 file cited under left margin. For information concerning the location of the file containing the record copy document, call files section, extension 4127.\n1. Subject was fifteen minutes late for the meeting scheduled for 1600 hours, claiming a terrible hangover and exhaustion, having spent most of the previous night with BXX, drinking. (I am quite sure that immediately upon his arrival and after making his explanation for being late he asked that his car was in the shop for repairs, but at the end of the unproductive meeting he walked to his car parked only half a block away from the cafe. I walked with him and commented on his earlier remark regarding repairs but he denied saying anything about it.)\n\n2. Subject had not yet seen LUBA but said that he planned to attend a party allegedly to be given by Lyublina (not Sergio's wife) at which time he will attempt to elicit info re LUBA's recent trip. Incidentally, Subject stated that Sergio had returned to Mexico 3 or 4 months ago. (It had been my understanding that Sergio was still in Moscow.) Subject had not seen either of the SERGIOs for several months.\n\n3. We chatted at great length about many innocuous topics, Russian literature, Mexican food, etc. At one point I attempted to have him work on LUBA's file, but he begged off, returning again to his exhaustion, etc. However, we scheduled a 1000 hour meeting at the J2I cafe for tomorrow. 25 August, 1945, stating to be in good condition enabling him to tackle the case at that time. (Personally, I am not in favor of doing this sort of work in a restaurant.)\n\n4. During our discussion of the LUBA literature Subj. asked me if I could get him a copy of SERGIO's \"IXLAD ISLANDS\" published in Russia, I said I would try.\n\n5. Subject is going to try to get away for a short vacation in Acapulco sometime in Sept. and he hopes that I can join him. I made no comment.\n\n6. While waiting for Subj. I was reading \"Sports Afield\" which I threw on a chair when Subject arrived. About halfway through the meeting Subj. asked me if I were interested in hunting and fishing and when I replied in the affirmative he quickly came up with a \"brilliant\" idea. He said he has a student an American friend, who is studying hunting and fishing, and he thought it would be a terrific idea for him to introduce this man, whom he would like to see so we could hunt and fish together. I told him I was not ready for this sort of thing yet, perhaps later.\n\n7. Subj. has a trip to England but has a date with his wife at the \"HILTON\" in London, on the 25th of August, apparently arranged. Subj. had been told he was very interested in the type of work we are asking him to do, but hopes he can have a more active role in the work. He said: \"I am to go to London, or any other part of England in order to do your bidding. I told him he was to do that, but not to think about it at this time, but even if he were to accept it, he would require much additional training. He laughed and said, \"I am only saying I understand your position.\"\n\n8. SERGIO. Subject is a strong, cocky, young, with a tendency to wander off into unrelated topics. He is a bit of a con artist, he seems to love everyone and is certainly a bit of a charmer. He is quite agreeable. He met to terminate the case after he had been arrested and given a serious briefing as to what this is all about. It is too early for me to tell whether he can be brought\ndown out of the clouds to face reality and I imagine a rather dull daily existence. I think he would like to be, and maybe is, an avid reader of literature. Perhaps he entertains thoughts of becoming a writer someday. He apparently enjoys putting away a good deal of alcoholic beverages.\n\n[Signature]\n\nDouglas P. [Last Name]\nAugust 6, 1967\n\nContact Report\nSubject: Jimmy FARKHI (P-13, P30)\nDate of Meet: Aug 5 at Continental Rest from 2000 to 2300 hrs.\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and S came on time. The purpose of the meet was to debrief S on his meet with LOC which took place the previous evening and proceed with the filling of the PAQ as well as to give necessary ops instruction. The purpose was achieved.\n\nNext meet: August 18 at the same time and place.\n\n2. The fact that LOC started the meet with a talk about books appeared to S to be curious. No doubt that LOC was peddling some Communist ideological tidbits, especially, justification of Sov international policy. Briefly, too much freedom is not good. Americans and their foreign policy is naive; they worry more about the world opinion than about their national interest; if they want to do something they consult everybody and everything to find out an ages old fact that nobody can satisfy everybody; Nixon's trip to Romania was outright a provocation aimed at Sov Union, except, if it was a product of naivenease.\n\n3. S was really surprised to hear LOC giving up so easily on the matter of the US Emb phone directory, but he was outright disappointed when LOC stated that he nor any of Sov Emb officials would want to meet with LOC. Further, S was shocked up when he directly told that he was to be Sov agent assigned to collect info about Red China and Nat Chinese policy concerning Sov - Red Chinese conflict from a Chinese Emb official. Although, he did not mention it to WASHDC, it was obvious that S did not like at all the idea that big money was spoken but there was no mention of money right now, i.e. during the period \"S will be working on winning TANG's confidence\".\n\n4. P reminded S that he told him at their previous meet concerning his involvement with the Chinese and said that if it was not clear then what P meant LOC spelled it out in clear terms. S, convinced that he did not want to go to see TANG before speaking to P, because he wanted to follow our instruction. This was said to please P on one hand and on the\nother to appease his (s) own fear from the mere possibility that something might go wrong and he would have nowhere to turn to. F told him that going to TANG only in connection with the matter of publishing the article could do him no harm; denying having contact with LOG recently is not sufficient; TANG could bring up the question for an extensive purpose of wanting to send a message to S Sov friend and the fact of not seeing each other during the past 2 - 3 weeks means nothing whatsoever, because S is supposed to be able to reach a friend; S must be ready to meet any question by TANG not by denying previous statements but by emphasizing that he was thinking carefully about what he told TANG and he reached the conclusion that that would get him in a situation he was never before and consequently, knows nothing about possible consequences; therefore, he decided to keep out a field he is ignorant in.\n\n5. As far as the other requirements concerning the Chinese are concerned, F told S to do nothing for the time being and, especially, to keep away from trying to ascertain the names of Mexicans working in the Chinese Bar. S should claim that he was spending his time on trying to get the name of the next Presidential candidate before the President sends the name of the candidate to ERI for approval. Further, S can always be in no more hurry than LOG was to get him an answer on the platinum deal.\n\n6. In spite of his reactions concerning the business part of the meet, S was flattered with LOG's invitation to spend a day with him and his family in Guatia to celebrate his birthday together. F asked F would it be appropriate if he and Josephine took a present to Mrs. LOG, as for example, a silver brooch or something similar. F told him that the maximum he could take for Mrs. LOG and the toy was a box of chocolate candies in the value of 100. F did not imply that he would pay for it.\n\n7. S read through the remainder of the ERI and it was true that he was able to give very few answers if he did not have an opportunity to observe LOG in the circle of his family and in conditions less formal than they usually meet. It may be noted that I read the questionnaire 2 - 3 times to be sure I what he had to pay attention. S was requested that F bring his back the portion he already filled out because he was not\ngive additional info and correct some of the given answers.\n\n8. At the end of the meet S stated that he did not have his car this evening because Josephine needed it. F told him that he was willing to pay him a taxi, but he was not able to give him a ride. F is quite sure that the car which S uses is Josephine's and that it is on S' disposal only when she does not need it. Further, if S ever wanted to identify F's car it is extremely doubtful that he would have ventured into setting excuses in an evening with such lousy weather as it was last night.\n\n9. Byproduct of the talk about the car was that we learned Josephine a.k.a. she is 49. According to S nobody would believe that she was more than 40.\n\nE. Bernhard\nATTACHMENT\nAugust 6, 1969\n\nSubject: Jimmy FABORI (P-15850) Report on His\nMeet with LOGINOV (P-11,712) on Aug 4 at Esmoros-San Angel\nat 2000 hrs.\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and it lasted 2 hours and 15 minutes.\n   As in all previous cases S and LOG met in front of the restaurant. LOG\n   came 3 minutes earlier.\n   THEIR NEXT MEET: On Aug 16 S and Josephine are to come to\n   Ouaatla at the \"Zanoe\" about 1000 hrs to\n   be guests of LOG and his family (to celebrate\n   S birthday which is on Aug 15 ).\n   On Aug 25 at Esmoros-San Angel at 2000 hrs a\n   business meet will be held.\n\n2. LOG and S 2 Vodka cocktails, club sandwich and a beer. LOG\n   claimed that he had already eaten something and S felt a stomach dis-\n   comfort.\n\n3. LOG asked S did he finish reading the book (in English) about\n   Rasputin which he gave him about a month ago. S answered affirmatively\n   and they spoke about the book. LOG promised to give S another book, written\n   a a British , titled \"USSR 1941-45\" or similar. LOG wants S to be\n   familiar with the suffering of Sov people during the WW II.\n\n4. Then, LOG asked S what was the situation with the US Embassy\n   Phone Directory. S stated that the fictitious girl Patricia showed up\n   for few day and returned to the States for family reasons. He brought\n   up in a conv with her the Directory and she told him that it was tightly\n   controled. S left it at that point and he told LOG that he would have\n   to start working on the matter from scratch if LOG wanted the Directory\n   but S would appreciate LOG's suggestions as to how to go about it. LOG\n   told S to forget it because he know that the directory was well controled.\n\n5. The next question by LOG was what progress did S make with\n   Mr. TANG. S told him about his meet with TANG on Aug 1 (See FINALLY's\n   FABORI Contact Report dated Aug 7, '69). LOG listened to the story\n   without interrupting and then he told S that he was not certain that\nTANG was a member of the Chinese Emb staff here, because he did not find his name in the diplomatic list. Further, he told S that he was doing a good job, which he appreciated, but he must be very cautious because the Chinese are clever people and extremely suspicious.\n\n6. In reply to S' question LOG stated that for anyone of them (Sov Emb official) would meet with TANG, because that it too dangerous. S queried what was dangerous about it and LOG stated that there was always a chance that they (TANG and LOG or another Sov) might be seen together and that would be very bad. S went on to tell S that it would be his job to develop friendly relations with TANG or possibly another Chinese official and slowly obtain from him the info LOG and his embassy needed; LOG will guide him as to how to go about it and if they show confidence in S he will have it made and Sova (LOG used the expression: VE) would pay him very well for that job. S commented that he had believed that what he was doing he did out of personal friendship with LOG and not for money. LOG smiled at S' statement and added that in addition to money they (Sova) enable S to travel to Sov Union and have a vacation on the Black Sea.\n\n7. While S was thinking whether to say something or keep quiet, LOG told him that the next time he went to TANG he should limit his conv to the publishing of the article about Nat China and if needed deny that he had any contact with his Sov friend (LOG) since he met TANG; S' job is to win TANG's confidence and that is a slow process with the Chinese. Then, in answer to LOG's question S stated that there were to Mexicans (a woman and a man) working at the Chinese Emb. LOG told him to get their names and addresses. S commented that this was not as simple as it sounded, because one cannot just ask a person what was his name and address. LOG commented that even this was a matter which cannot be rushed; first get their names and later obtain the address.\n\n8. There was another thing S should do; find out how many Chinese live in Mexico City and determined which ones were the influential ones and among the latter ones determine which are the most influential; he can start working on this by dropping in a better Chinese restaurant and trying to develop some acquaintances; it can be assumed that those who go to restaurants are people who have money and those who have money are\nusually influential. S agreed with LOG and expected LOG to tell him that he would pay for the visiting of Chinese restaurants, but LOG kept quiet.\n\n9. S had no intention to skip the talk about money and he told him that the publishing of the article about Kat China may end in a blind alley if TANG does not supply at least a half a page of advertising. LOG did not want that to happen and he told S that he (LOG) would give him MN 1,000 if the printing of the article should be held because of lack of advertising. S brought to LOG's attention that half of page of advertising brings to Pierre (RUDIAN) 1,500 pesos. LOG felt that he would pay that money as a price of keeping the door open to the Chinese Emb for S. To put some costing on the pill S added that he would try to obtain an ad or two from Chinese restaurants, but he doubted that the owners would be interested in advertising in a magazine which is far from being well known. Just the idea that S contemplated going to Chinese restaurants pleased LOG's ear.\n\n10. LOG was interested in the status of the Presidential race and S told him that it narrowed down to four candidates and that all the indications were in the direction that ECHAVARRIA was to be the official PRI candidate. S believed that by Aug 20 he would know the name of the candidate. In reply to LOG's question S stated that the candidate will be publicly known Sept 15-20.\n\n11. LOG wanted to give more time to be positive of the name of the Presidential candidate and he decided that their next (business) meet would be on Aug 25 at the same time and place. LOG immediately added that he did not forget that S birthday was on Aug 15 and that he believed that it would be the best if they celebrated together in Cuautla on Ema Aug 16. LOG added that on that day his wife and son would be with him in Cuautla and S should bring along Josephine; LOG will bring a bottle of \"Russian\" champagne and pic-nic style food; there will be bottle of Vodka for Josephine and a bottle of (P does not remember what) for S plus the book he previously mentioned. LOG added some more description about what a wonderful day they would have together. They are to meet in Cuautla about 1000 hrs at the \"HenceB. LOG will be there without fail because he will pick up his son who is now attending the \"Russian School\"\nin Cuernavaca; the son speaks only Russian and English and LOG is looking forward to the fact that his son will be obliged to speak English all day; LOG's wife speaks a little Spanish and there will be no problem for her and Josephine to understand each other. S promised to be there.\n\n12. Last moment assignment for S: LOG hold an info that TANG speaks Russian. If S succeeds to verify this fact LOG would like to know where did TANG learn Russian.\n1. Agent/Subject: LICOZY-5\n\n2. Case Officer Vincent P. RIZZUTO\n\n3. Date and site of contact: 4 Aug 69 at Restaurant Parque\n\n4. Date and site of next meeting: Subject will call\u2014see below\n\n5. Administrative (salaries, accountings, etc.)\n\nSubject mentioned near the close of the meeting that he owed me $600 (US) for the TV set which COIGNE had obtained for him. I said that I thought this was a gift but Subject said no, he insisted on paying for it and would do so shortly. Meanwhile, a part has burned out and he cannot obtain a replacement in Mexico because this particular model is not made in Mexico. He will call in with the details and I will try to get it for him.\n\n6. Information/Instructions passed agent:\n\nNone\n\n7. Report/Information received from agent: (use back if necessary)\n\nSubject had been in Europe and Israel for several weeks since our last meeting. Nothing of particular interest developed on this trip.\n\nBefore he left, Subject was invited by NECHIPORENKO (P-7442) to celebrate the latter's birthday (which happens to be 4 July). Subject tried to beg off but NECHIPORENKO refused to take no for an answer and actually came to Subject's apartment with KOSTIKOV to bring Subject to NECHIPORENKO's apartment. Since NECHIPORENKO's wife was away, three girls from the Planitsky Chorus were awaiting the three men. Considerable drinking was done and Subject said it was obvious why they had asked him since the third girl needed a partner. Her name was Nina BUCHAROVA. Subject said that all of the girls were quite attractive and \"available for anything.\" Subject said that he understood that most of the girls in the Chorus fit this category and that they would simply wait until their housemother was asleep before going out and getting some action.\n\nSubject and NECHIPORENKO actually have a good personal relationship.\n\n8. Security:\n\nNone\n\n(see attached sheet)\n\npage 2\n\n9. Miscellaneous:\n\nSubject solved a mystery of where GISTTNER was during his recent visit. Subject had met GISTTNER at the airport and had wined and dined his family during most of the time that GISTTNER was here. No wonder GISTTNER had no time for LIBERTY or anybody else.\nSubject believes that NECHIPORENKO is very intelligent. He speaks the best Spanish of any of the Soviets known to Subject and due to this facility as well as his looks, can pass for a Mexican. Subject believes that NECHIPORENKO was given the task of cultivating and attempting to re-recruit him after LOGINOV failed. Subject had some interesting comments about LOGINOV (P-11,712) which seem to jive with other comments which have been made about him. LOGINOV had apparently originally been given the task of re-recruiting Subject. When he failed, he felt rebuffed and has since been very cool towards Subject. Subject believes that LOGINOV either has or thinks he has been given bad marks by his superiors for having failed with Subject. LOGINOV is probably jealous or NECHIPORENKO who has at least managed to retain Subject's friendship. Subject says that LOGINOV is not dumb and that he uses his good looks to great advantage particularly with women.\n\nSubject has recently had some dealings with IVANOV (P-1612) who is furious for the following reason: Formerly Soviets leaving Mexico would take KLM or Sabena to Europe where they would pick up Aeroflot the following day. KLM and Sabena would pay overnight hotel costs. Now, however, the Soviets are picking up Aeroflot in New York. Because of rescheduling, however, they still must spend at least one night in New York. The airlines will not pay this and IVANOV wanted Subject to cover it. Subject refused for the very sound reason that it did not make sense for him to pay $20 for selling a $127 ticket from which his profit was only $9. IVANOV became furious and Subject yielded by agreeing to pay for IVANOV's accommodations and he said he would do it for those becoming as friendly, such as NECHIPORENKO, but he would not do it as a general rule. While Subject was away, however, his wife went overboard and got IVANOV four rooms (for two people). Now Subject is furious.\n\nOn 31 July Subject was visited by PRIKHODKO (P-2270) who came in carrying a copy of Pravda or Izvestiya. Subject quoted the old saw, \"There is no truth in Pravda and no news in Izvestiya,\" and PRIKHODKO got mad claiming Subject was acting very unfriendly by making anti-Soviet propaganda. PRIKHODKO was very serious. This is probably as good and as accurate a thumbnail sketch on PRIKHODKO that we are likely to get. PRIKHODKO, who said that he was leaving in September, had visited Subject to find out what Subject knew about a congress of Jewish intellectuals which is to be held in mid-September in Bogota to discuss the Jewish problem in the Soviet Union. PRIKHODKO wanted to know who was going from Mexico. Subject told PRIKHODKO that he had not heard of the congress but would check into it. He did check with someone at the Israeli Embassy who was horrified to learn that word had gotten out since at this time knowledge of the congress is confidential. Subject told me that he would tell PRIKHODKO that he had been unable to learn anything, reasoning that to tell him about it would get him involved with further requirements and would be working against the best interests of the Jews. I told Subject that I agreed completely.\n\nSubject said that the Sputnik group which was due in June never did get Mexican visas and their trip has been cancelled. On the other hand, a delegation of about a dozen Soviets is due in August for a Congress of eye, ear, nose, and throat specialists, and still another group of a dozen is due in September for a congress of soil mechanics. Since these are official delegates as opposed to the sputnik group who were tourists, they will have no trouble getting Mexican visas.\n\nSubject himself will be going to Budapest from 1 to 7 November for the IICA congress. Subject is world chairman of this group which apparently is in the International Convention Organization.\n\nSubject has received several letters from the Sputnik translator he met on his recent trip to the Soviet Union. She had received the dictionary that he had sent her from Rome and the art books he had sent her from Mexico but not a pair of glasses he had sent her by KLM. Subject will look into this. He is obviously quite fond of this girl and appeared to be seeking my reassurance that she was not a KGB provocateur. I repeated that I had said before which is that the possibility she is should be considered but that under the\nAugust 2, 1969\n\nContact Report\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13,630)\nDate of Meet: August 1 at Restaurant LYN Le Club and Bonaparte Bar\nfrom 2000 to 2340 hrs\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and S came on time. The main purpose\nof the meet was to have fill the PAQ on LOGINOV (P-11,712), which was\naccomplished to a satisfactory degree, i.e. 26 pages out of 53. Further,\nFERNALD wanted to check what S has done or prepared for his next meet\nwith LOO which is scheduled for Monday Aug 4 at 2000 hrs (this will be\ncovered in the following para).\n\nNext meet: Tuesday August 5 at the Restaurant-Bar Continental\nat 2000 hrs.\n\n2. On Friday Aug 1 at 1400 hrs S called on CHIN-HSIEN TANG, Minister\nCounselor of the Nat Chinese Emb at his office. The purpose of the\ncall was to explain that the magazine La Mission goes to press the latest\non the 18th of the month and it was too late to have anything published\non Nat. China. In accordance with the instruction S received from Pierre\nRUMIAN, S told TANG that in publishing such articles the magazine writes\nthem according to the wishes of the embassy of the country about which\nthey are written. Because embassies pay only the subscription, they\nusually see to it that at least a half of page of advertising is in-\ncluded in the same issue.\n\n3. TANG expressed understanding for such a practice and stated that\nhe was interested in having an article on the Republic of China and\nprobably one on Chien-Kai-Shek and that he would see to it that a proper\namount of ads be purchased.\n\n4. TANG went on to ask which embassies are subscribers of the\nmagazine and which use it for publishing articles. S stated that practically\nall embassies are subscribers and almost all of them had their articles\npublished at one time or the other. TANG, apparently, was not satisfied\nwith this answer and he asked point blank was the Sov Embassy a sub-\nscriber.\n\nWhen S answered affirmatively, TANG asked S did he know anybody\nin the Sov Embassy. S stated that he was on friendly terms with an official of the Sov Embassy. TANG commented that this was unusual, because Sovs make friends with nobody. S stated again that he had no other way of calling his relation with the Sov official than a personal friendship. In reply to TANG's question S stated that he preferred not to mention the name of his Sov friend and TANG asked what position did S's Sov friend have. S replied that as far as he knew the Sov official was quite high up (sic). TANG continued his questioning: what was the nature of S's relationship with the Sov, was it a business type relationship; how often did they see each other; where did they meet. S stated that he never transacted any business with the Sov and they meet about twice a month for a dinner or lunch in various restaurants. S added that the Sov plays tennis every week-end and that he (S) sometime goes to watch him playing (Note: the latter statement is not true). TANG asked did S play tennis and he answered negatively.\n\n6. At this point S asked was he interested in meeting his Sov friend and TANG stated that he was. Then, S asked TANG what should he say to his Sov friend. TANG commented that this was a good question and he told S that he would think about it. Consequently, he asked S could he pass by on Monday or Tuesday (Aug 4 or 5) and S said he would.\n\n7. In reply to S's question S stated that he intended to tell LOG exactly what transpired on his meet with TANG and that he planned visiting TANG on Monday so that he would be able to tell LOG did TANG decide to meet LOG.\n\n8. P told S that he was going too far in pleasing LOG and was getting in a deeper and deeper mess by getting involved with the Nat Chinese; it was obvious from the attitude of Mr. TANG that he read him through and was taking his time to find something out of the whole scheme. Therefore, S should also take it easy and not rush to see TANG on Monday, i.e. before seeing LOG; further, he should stick to his previous decision that it was rather dangerous to be meeting with LOG often.\n\n9. S felt that LOG would press for a meet with S as soon as possible once he got to know that TANG had opened the possibility of wanting to meet with LOG. P considered this to be possible and impressed on S that\nit was up to him to stall.\n\n10. At this point S asked P would we help him out if he got in trouble on account of his association with LOG. P replied that he was trying to instruct him how to keep out of trouble and it appeared that S did not care much about what P was telling him. P reacted quite strongly to P's statement by saying that P was wrong, or at least incorrectly interpreted S's attitude; as far as he (S) is concerned he is willing to discontinue meeting with LOG immediately, if we tell him to do so. P answered that if we wanted him to drop LOG we would have told him to do it. Nevertheless, S as an American is certainly aware of the fact that the US Service and, consequently, the US security is getting nothing out of S's collaboration with LOG; in view of the fact that LOG will remain here only about 2 months more we felt it would be the best to leave the matter take its normal course and find its natural end; we were and continue to be interested in keeping him out of trouble, but to achieve this the most important thing was that he carry out our instruction as he received it; we badly need that S fullheartedly comply with our instruction; if S's association with the KGB (sic) continues after the departure of LOG we would probably be willing to continue our relationship with S only if we were able to count on his sincerity and complete complying with every instruction he may receive from us. S stated that it was clear to him that he could not count on any help from us if he got himself in trouble by acting on his own. P left it at that.\n\n11. As the working part of the meeting ended about 1040 hrs S stated that he was broke and did not anticipate to be in a better financial condition for two additional months. S turned this theme one way and the other until he came out with the request for about 50.- Dollars. P answered that he would look into the matter and we left the INN Le Club and started walking. S, was obviously fearing that the meet would break up and he would go home without any money, and complained that the place (the INN) was good for writing purposes but the food was lousy (true) and no drinks were served and that if he was not broke he would have invited P to a brandy. P reacted by offering a brandy. Once at the bar S asked P could he give him some money this evening. P felt it would serve no purpose if he stalled more and he gave S 5000.- and obtained a receipt for the same.\nContact Report\nSubject: LIMOSCH-1 (W-4905)\nDate of Meet: July 20 at Restaurant Firenze at 1630\n\n1. Prearranged meet to which L-1 came 10 min early. The meet lasted 2 hours and 30 min.\n   Next meet: Wednesday Aug 6 at the same place at 1630 hrs.\n\n2. L-1 came to this meet in much better shape than he was last time in spite of the fact that he complained of being tired. He wanted to eat something, but he did not feel he was having a full meal. He had 4 drinks (Rum and Coke).\n\n3. L-1 handed me a personality sketch which he prepared on BROWN which is not much by itself, but it could be useful for personality assessment of B.\n\n4. I questioned as much as I was able without tipping my hand, about his visit to the Sov Emb on July 9. I detected no indication of deception nor withholding of info on his side.\n\n5. In the course of debriefing L-1 on his meet with LCG I made my comments and gave him necessary instruction, which are covered in the following para.\n\n6. As L-1 mentioned LCG questioning about LIOV/L-1 he immediately pointed out that the whole thing made no sense to him after LCG repeated statements at the last meet that he was not interested in LIOV/L-1. I told L-1 that it made little sense to me, except, if LCG wanted to ascertain was L-1 telling him the truth. Then I added that I wished LIOV/L-1 had made some statement which L-1 could relay to LCG to see what would be his reaction. L-1 suggested that once in the past he told LCG that LIOV/L-1 told him that he used to know a Sov diplomat here whom he considered to be his friend and was disappointed when the Sov diplomat tried to recruit him, because it was obvious that the friendship was a pretense. LCG heard this he laughed and said that this was one of the old clumsy methods which are no longer used. (L-1: I did not know about...\nthis fact and would appreciate whether it is contained in the files)\n\n7. With regard to Victor I. RAMOS P. (cr R) there is little to\nbe said which was not mentioned in the Attachment f 1. His calling\nnumber and the following phrases printed: 46-77-17; 46-15-78 and on the\nback was written 32-09-95. I am not inclined to take at the face value\nLOCH's statement that he knew nothing about RAMOS, especially, in view\nof the fact that RAMOS ought to be attending the ILCM for some time to\nbe able to speak some Russian and pronounced well. L-1 is willing to\nmake the translation RAMOS wants if he finds no difficulty in handling\nthe terminology.\n\n8. LOCH's reaction on ILCM's plan to show the Sov film at the\nCP center at Versailles appears to be interesting.\n\n9. L-1 was again puzzled with LOCH's hints that L-1 should do something\nfor the Socialist cause genuinely dislikes the idea of getting involved\nin the EGB work. I told him that I also did not want him to get involved\nin any way for EGB but I did not want him to be cast aside by Sov officials;\nthere will be things L-1 can do to show the good will and what he does\ndoes amount to nothing as is the case with the showing of the Sov film;\nthe most important is that he does nothing without checking with me.\n\n10. According to L-1, LOCH never before revealed his political\nway of thinking as much as he did in his statements concerning the\nexcessive freedom in the USSR and other Socialist countries.\n\n11. In answer to my question L-1 stated that he brought up the\nquestion of not being invited by LOCH to his apt, because on the previous\nmeet I asked him whether he was ever in LOCH house. This correct and\nI asked L-1 this question having in mind the filling out of the FAQ.\nI saw in L-1's agenda under Aug 8 LOCH address plus 1900 hrs. I told L-1\nthat if he is received by LOCH as a friend that it will be necessary that\nhe (L-1) give a farewell dinner for LOCH at his place. As a matter of fact\nbefore breaking up the evening L-1 should ask LOCH and his wife which\ndate in Sept they would be able to come to L-1's house; he will add that\nhe would appreciate if LOCH brought along one or two Sov couples. If LOCH\nwishes who else would be there L-1 will state he did not plan having anyone\nelse, but if LOCH wishes to he was willing to invite anyone LOCH suggested.\nPurpose of this suggestion from the point of our interest is quite obvious.\n\n12. After the debriefing I asked 2-1 to start filling out the INQ and it 10 pages were completed. The work was going slower than I anticipated because it is not only a matter of translating but also explaining the questions.\n\nE. Fernald\nATTACHMENT #1\nJuly 31, 1969.\n\nSubject: LIBAGON-1 (P-4805) - LOGIKOV (P-11,712) Meet\nat Restaurant Fonda del Retiro on July 28 at 1300 hrs\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and L-1 was in front of the restaurant\n4 min before LOG. The meet lasted about 90 minutes.\nTHEIR NEXT MEET: Friday August 8 at LOG's Apt at Ignacio Esteva\n21/2 at 1900 hours.\n\n2. No cocktails were taken before the meal and with the meal beer\nwas drank. LOG lead off with questions concerning L-1's family, health,\nwork and entertainment.\n\n3. Among questions concerning L-1's work there were also questions\nconcerning LIOVAL-1: was L-1 giving him classes regularly; was LIOVAL-1\nasking L-1 questions about the USSR or Sov officials; did LIOVAL-1 make\nany statements which would show \"how he treats politically\" (sic). L-1\ngave routine answer pointing out that LIOVAL-1 does not hesitate to speak\nabout his family matters and work, but he never asks questions of any\nkind; he takes his language classes regularly; there were no statements\nconcerning political matters.\n\n4. L-1 told LOG that July 24 or 25 a young man Victor I RAMOS\ncalled on him in the evening at home and told him that he needed a transla-\ntion of about 20 pages of Russian text into Spanish and that he\nwas sent by LOG and he asked him who was the person. LOG stated that he\ndid not know the person and since it was a matter of translation he (LOG)\nsent him to L-1 hoping that he may earn some money by making the translation\nL-1 asked LOG did he know that RAMOS spoke some Russian which he learned\nat the KGBM. LOG stated that he was not aware of that fact. L-1 will\nmake the translation if he can handle the terminology dealing with economy.\n\n5. L-1 told LOG that he spoke to MUNOZ about the Sov film and\nthat MUNOZ was pleased with the offer. Due to the fact that MUNOZ is\npresently undergoing a treatment he was not able to make arrangements\nfor showing of the film. In reply to LOG's question L-1 stated that\nMUNOZ wanted to show the film in the Communist Party Centro (sic) at\nTransunion\nVersailles, LOG exclaimed that for heaven's sake he did not anything like that; he wanted this to be entirely on private and personal basis without political elements involved; to show the film at Versailles would be stupid, it would just enable the imperialists to blast in the papers that the Soviets were getting involved in internal political matters of Mexico; in view of the coming Presidential elections this could be blown up into a scandal. L-1 remarked that he saw no difference in showing the film in the OCPentro or in the Centro Asturiano as LOG wanted originally. LOG explained at length the difference and L-1 promised to have another talk with MU\u00d1OZ.\n\n6. L-1 told LOG that quite recently he saw in the press something written to the effect that there are presently in the USSR 4 types of detention (concentration) camps and he wondered whether that was an indication that the freedom in the USSR was being trimmed again. LOG stated that \"this was pure imperialist propaganda\". He went on to say that in the USSR the cafes are full of people and that one can hear them even criticizing the government. He added that in his opinion there is too much (demasiado mucho) freedom in the USSR and other Socialist countries. If Stalin was alive it could not happen that while the people in America are openly protesting against the war in Vietnam and against imperialism a Socialist country as Czechoslovakia rises its people in favor of American and West German imperialism. \"Too much freedom in the USSR results with still more freedom in other Socialist countries; this is no longer freedom, it is a shameful betrayal of Socialism; I hope that it will be realized soon that Stalin was right\", said LOG.\n\n7. At this point LOG worked in a hint to L-1 that he should do something for the Socialist cause. L-1 sounded his old tune saying that he saw nothing he could do and added that now when LOG opened him the door to the American Intelligence Service through Victor RAKOS (actually working for The Economist Intelligence Unit, S.A., Reforma 116 - 801 D) he would find out would they pay him well and if they would he would work for them, because anyway the Soviets never gave him anything. When LOG asked him what the hell he was speaking about, L-1 stated that he was joking and LOG commented that L-1 had never done anything to help the Soviet effort and consequently, they were not able to pay him anything. LOG asked for him and his wife, etc. and added that he (LOG)\nnever invited him to his house, while at the time he had met BROVIN\nhe was invited to BS house after they met the second or third time.\nLOG told L-1 he had no intention of keeping L-1 away from his house,\nbut he wanted him to know that since the time BROVIN was here certain\nthings had changed; previously the Sov Embassy was paying the rent for\nthe apts of their officials and now the officials have to pay the rent\nfrom their salary. Consequently, LOG lives in a small, modest apt and he\ndoes not feel that it is adequate for receiving people. L-1 commented\nthat LOG's statement made him feel bad because he believed that they were\nfriends and that formalities were not necessary among them. LOG counter-\nacted this by saying that L-1 and his wife were invited to his apt on\nWed July 30, but he did not want L-1 to be surprised to see in what kind\nof apt a Sov Dipl officials was living. L-1 thanked for the invitation\nand stated that it was impossible to him to come before 2030 hrs on Wed\nbecause he had late classes. LOG felt that 2030 was rather late and they\nagreed that my L-1 and his wife would come to LOG's for dinner on Friday\nAug 8.\n\nEMPerinal\nContact Report\nSubject: Mervyn SABORI (P-13,870)\nDate of July 22 at the Raffaello from 2000 to 2125 hours.\n\n1. This meet was held in lieu of the one scheduled for the previous evening to which S did not come. In the course of the morning of July 22 I tried to reach S by phone at his office but he did not come there. In the afternoon he phoned to our office and left the message to call his home. I called about 1625 when I returned from another ops meet, but S was not in. Josephine told me that he would be back in 30 minutes. Then I called at 1700 hrs Josephine told me that S called from out and told her that he was going to the airport and that I should call about 1800 hrs. At 1815 hrs a maid answered the phone and told that S was out but would return home soon. At 1900 hrs the maid gave me the same answer. At 1930 hrs Josephine answered and passed the phone to S. We arranged this meet.\n\nNext meet: August 1 at the Chez Le Club at 2000 hrs.\n\n2. S did not go through much of trouble to explain the reason he did not come to the meet the previous day. He said that he did not write in his notebook the time of the meet and he went to the Raffaello at 1400 hrs just to see whether I was there; in the evening he went to movies with Josephine \"because, anyway he was not sure when we were supposed to meet. I listened to his explanation without comment.\n\n3. Inevitably, the moon landing was the first topic. S spoke about his excitement while watching the TV on July 20 in the evening and he concluded that 217 congratulated him on the great American success and explained the failure of the Luna 15 by saying that it must have landed on a rock and toppled down. At this point I asked S when did he see 217 and he answered that they had their meet on Friday July 19. Silly\u2014silly I had to ask S how could 217 congratulate him on the successful moon landing which took place two days later. It took a second or two until S told me that 217 extended his congratulations by phone. Silly. It is possible that I meet with 217 took place as was scheduled and there was no talk about the moon landing but an emotional description of the feat carried to the statement about 2000 congratulations. It is also\nthat S met with LOC on 10th evening (July 21), i.e., at the time S was supposed to meet with me and he did not have the guts to tell me that he left me waiting and he went to meet with LOC.\n\n4. I went to the debriefing of S on his meet with LOC. Most of the aspects of that meet are self-explanatory. Nevertheless, there are new interesting factors concerning S' future meets with LOC. It may be noted that S requested less frequent meet on basis of suggestion I made to him during the brief meet of July 10. Another factor is the rattling of big money.\n\n5. There are facts which are naive and contradictory as far as LOC is concerned. LOC will work out a plan which is to provide security to their personal meets on one hand and on the other he invited S to come to the French Club.... LOC did not appear a serious operator if he felt that S was able to lead TAO in convs about military strength of Red China.\n\n6. The previously heralded friendship between LOC and TAO boils down to a bubble. On the other hand, my attempt to debrief S on the activity of TAO was just a little better than nothing. (Till prepare a separate Attachment).\n\n7. As the attachment I show I discussed in detail the question of S' phone call to LOC on July 10.\n\n8. I also showed to S 10 pages of the LOC and he felt confident to be able to answer them and similar set. In fact, the restaurant Raffello does not lend itself to the exercise of doing any writing there. Therefore we agreed to meet in my 1st hotel for the purpose of filling out the LOC.\n\n9. I asked to him to receive any answer on his application (sic) meaning the LOC. I told him that I would have advised him if I had anything to that respect. So as it looked that the question indirectly meant all we intend to give him some money.\n\nSincerely\nRe: Phone call to LCC on July 10\n\n1. JS stated without hesitation that he phoned to LCC on July 10, i.e. the day their next took place.\n\n2. JS believes that he made his first phone call (the one recorded by LEMOY) about 1100 hrs. He was told to call in an hour and he DID CALL more or less an hour later. Then, he was told that LCC was still busy and that he should call in 30 minutes. JS CALLED AS HE WAS TOLD and after quite bit of waiting LCC came to the phone. Consequently, JS made THREE calls to the same phone number.\n\n3. All THREE calls which JS made were answered by the same male voice. There was no indication that the male answering the phone recognized JS's voice in any of his two back calls.\n\n4. JS recalls that when he made his second call and stated that it was \"Vladimir calling\" the operator understood that \"calling\" was the second name and he asked JS how to spell it, which required some explaining.\n\n5. JS is positive that at no time during his 3 calls he mentioned any kind of second name.\n\n6. English was spoken at the request of the operator.\n\nComment: Apart of the fact that the event did take place, there should verify the assumption that at least 3 back calls were made. There were no indications that JS tried to dictate or spell a letter. It is possible that the operator was cut off at the beginning of the first call and back calls.\nATTACHMENT # 2\nJuly 24, 1969\n\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13,830) Report on\nMeet with LOGINOV (P-11,712) on July 18 at SSFe-Paris\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and it lasted about two hours. The previously used procedure was followed: S and LOG met in front of the restaurant and they entered it together. As usually, LOG was sharp in appearing at on the spot.\n\nTHEIR NEXT MEET: On Aug 4 at Saaborne Insurgentes-Taquena at 2000 hrs.\n\n2. Course of the Meet.\n\nLOG asked S why he did not come \"to play tennis with him\" at the French Club on July 12. S explained that he was not feeling well and that he did not recover completely from the flu which he had all week. S added that only for the reason of keeping the word given to a friend (LOG) he came to this meet. Nice words by LOG who concluded that he brought 2 bottles of Vodka which can be used as \"a medicine\" for colds and similar discomforts.\n\n3. As it could be expected after such an opening of the meet LOG was interested was S able to accomplish something for him. S told him that he had done what he promised and gave LOG the written report which LOG read. When he finished the reading LOG remarked that S did not sign the report. When S said that he was willing to do it right there, LOG said that it was not necessary and that he was only joking.\n\n4. LOG spent considerable amount of time in questioning S about the reasons, consequences which the cancellation of PEKEX contract(s) with some US oil companies. At certain point the questions lacked clarity and S asked LOG point blank what was he driving at. LOG stated that S should realize that the USSR is the second largest producer of oil in the world (sic) and that he was interested in finding out was it possible for the USSR to step in where the Americans kicked out (sic). S told LOG that it was difficult to go more wrong than LOG was in his thinking, because if Mexicans did not want Americans involved in their oil business it was positively certain that they wanted no foreigner, re-\n- 2 -\n\ngardless of who they may be, to have anything to do with Mexican oil industry.\n\n5. LOG commented that the USSR was very much interested in establishing strong economic interchange, especially trade, with Mexico and were not finding the right atmosphere nor proper response in Mexico. He asked S what, in his opinion, could or should be done to overcome this situation. S answered that he believed that the Soviets ought to change their mentality if they wanted to trade with Mexico, namely, in the field of trade they should forget about Socialism and adapt the Capitalistic mentality; to trade with Mexico Soviets would have to establish industrial plants here and to do it Mexicans must have 51 per cent share in each case, which means the controlling stock; in reality this does not mean that Mexicans would invest 51 per cent of the value........\n\n6. LOG went to the other item of the written report and he asked S how he went about in contacting Chin-Wei TANG, counselor of the Nat Chinese Emb. S told him about posing as a reporter for the magazine La Nacion and going there on recommendation of Pierre RUDIAN (see FERNALD's previous contact report). S added that in the Sept issue of the magazine there would be an article dealing with Nat China and the Peiping - Moscow conflict and if needed another article on Chiang-Kai Shek would be published. LOG told S that he was pleased with the manner in which S handled the task he gave him. LOG did not discuss the contents of this part of S's report and he questioned S about CETANG; he wanted to know S in a position to keep this acquaintance alive and develop it in to a sort of friendly informal relationship; he (LOG) knew TANG from some formal diplomatic gatherings and he liked the person. S believed that he was able to keep alive the established acquaintance and was not able to guess as to how far he would be able to develop it. LOG suggested that S do not allow too much time to pass until his next visit to TANG. S said that he could call on TANG on Fri July 25 to explain him that he did not succeed in getting the article in the Aug issue of the magazine and will publish it in Sept issue; at the same time S will make it known that he was interested in getting the material for an article on Chiang-kai Shek which should keep the doors open for another visit.... S was in his element when he was describing this and LOG was not finding enough word to praise S and at the same time to encourage him to all he can\nto bring his relationship with TANG to a point that LOG could meet TANG in a friendly unofficial manner. LOG concluded that for such a job he was willing to pay $ in terms of thousands of Dollars. After the dust of verbage settled LOG told S that he should try to feel out TANG was he willing to speak about the military strength of Red China. LOG explained to S that presently the Soviets were completely in dark as to the military strength and operational organization of the Red Chinese army; they have no way of acquiring the info because even if they had friends in Red China none of them dared to maintain contact with Sov officials nor officials of other Socialist countries which are known to be on the Sov side; Nat China has many spies in Red China and they are well informed on all aspects of developments in Red China; it is possible that TANG would be willing to make arrangements with his government for exchange of info, especially, military info between the USSR and the Rep. of China and this would be beneficiary to the USSR and the USA. LOG went on to tell S that he should think in terms of using RUDIAN for getting to meet TANG out of his embassy; be that a party or whatever might be needed, the expenses will taken care of by LOG, because money is no problem.\n\n7. Then, LOG stated that S should arrange something to enable LOG to meet RUDIAN in a small, family type, circle. S was caught by surprise and told LOG that he told him that he and RUDIAN were quite often seeing each other. LOG stated that he knew RUDIAN well and was in many instances with RUDIAN at receptions and other formal social functions, but he never had an opportunity to be with RUDIAN in friendly and informal circumstances. S commented that the only problem he found in trying to make such an arrangement was in the fact that RUDIAN often, sometime even twice in a week, drops in to see S at his (Josephine's) apt but he never announces his visits in advance more than an hour or two before he comes.\n\n8. LOG asked S what happened to the US Emb phone directory; did the girl (friend of S) return. S answered that he did not have the slightest idea what was going on. \"because in his condition (of health) he did even go to check did the girl return\".\n\n9. LOG was proposing that they meet in the course of the next week but S told him that he felt that they were meeting too often and in view\nof his status of a tourist it may be assumed that the Gobernacion carry\nout spot checks on him; if he was to be seen by the Gobernacion or Security\nagents in company of LOG it is pretty certain that they would take him\nin and interrogate him; he thinks that this can be avoided if they do not\nsee each other so often.\n\n10. LOG agreed with S' reasoning and added that he himself realized\nthat they were getting together too often and he also cannot be 100 per\ncent sure that he is not tailed some-time. Therefore, he will out a plan\nby which they will be able to see each other whenever it is needed and\nwill limit their regular personal meets to twice per month. He went on\nto tell S that he would pick up an appropriate spot on which S will place\na chalk sign when he needs to see LOG urgently; LOG will pass by the place\nevery morning and if he sees the sign he will erase it which will assure\nS that he undetood his request and they would then meet the same evening\nat a place (restaurant) which they would select only for this purpose.\nLOG concluded by stating that this was the general idea and that he would\nwork out the details which he will explain to S on their next meet which\nthey would hold in two weeks, i.e. August 4.\n\n11. S commented that the plan looked good and if LOG was sure that\nit would work then there was no need for them to meet more than one a\nmonth. LOG stated that 2 meets per month were needed in spite of the\nfact that he was positive that his system was dependable.\n\n12. S told LOG that he did not spend any of the MN 400.- he gave\nhim for the purpose of establishing contact with an official of the\nNat Chinese Emb and consequently wanted to return the money. LOG told\nhim to keep it for himself and that he would give him money, as much as\nneeded, if he had an opportunity to entertain TANG.\n\n13. There was some un consequential talk and LOG told S to come\nto the French Club any Saturday and that he would teach him to play\ntennis. LOG explained that he was going to the club every Saturday\nabout 1000 hrs; S will be allowed to enter if he says that LOG was\nwaiting for him.\n\nEifernald\nContact Report\n\nSubject: Jimmy SANCHEZ (P-13,830)\n\nDate of Event: July 15, 1949 at Lechler Campo & Leibnitz Coffee Shop at 1500 hrs.\n\n1. The meet was arranged by phone. On July 17 S phoned to our office and requested that FARMER ring him up the next morning. After numerous fruitless attempts F finally reached S at his house at 1730 hrs. S told F that he was with a Chinese the previous day and would see him again on that afternoon at 1400 hrs. S concluded that on the basis of his first encounter with the Chinese he prepared a report for his friend (LOGINOV) whom he would see the same evening at 2000 hrs. F told S that he would want to see what he wrote before he gives it to LOG and a meet was arranged at the above indicated location.\n\n2. F asked S how did he manage to see Mr. Chin-Hsien Tang and where did he see him. S stated that Pierre Audibert helped him. F phoned to the Nat China Emb and said that S, a collaborator in the La Mission, would like to visit the Emb and talk to a person who would be able to give him some info for an article he was preparing for La Mission. On July 17 about 1700 hrs S went to the Emb and after saying that he was coming from Pierre Audibert he was received by TANG, Counselor of the Emb. S stated that he was interested in preparing an article concerning China - Sov ideological conflict, Mao territorial claims and repeated border clashes; S would want have some views of Nat China government on these problems. TANG stated that he, for his government, had any interest in the ideological conflict between Peking and Moscow; with regard to Mao territorial claims there was no doubt that they were legitimate. The fact that he was bring up this claims tends to indicate that Mao position was weak within the country and his ruling party, and therefore, he did not seek an issue which would unite the leaders and people around him; such a political play may lead to war. S claims that he asked TANG on which side would that. TANG be in case of war between Nat China and the USSR and TANG told him that such a decision would be made by a special top level department of their government. In S' remark that Nat China cannot\ncount on American assistance to return to the mainland, TANG stated that Nat China Government was aware of the fact that the USA cannot help them in that matter without getting involved in war with Mao's forces, which Nat China understands and considers that such a war would serve no purpose.\n\n3. According to S after 10 - 15 min of talking TANG gave S some material and told him to return the next day to pick up additional material which he could use for his article. Therefore, S went to the Nat China Emb on July 18 at 1400 hrs and got some of their publications in English. To keep the door open for additional visit S requested some material on Chien-kai Shek and TANG told him that it would take some time to get it. TANG also asked did S or La Mission have connections with Sove here and S stated they did not, but the Sove were subscribers to the magazine. Reportedly, this visit lasted about 20 minutes.\n\n4. After reading the paper (report) which S prepared for LDC I asked S was the Julian CARRILLO FLORES the same person whom he mentioned previously to me to his source on the Port of Spain meet Conference and referred to him as Eduardo. S claims that he knew of no Eduardo CARRILLO FLORES, and if he had stated that it was Eduardo it must have been a slip of tongue. As for Julian, he is a Department (unknown which) Chief in ENEX.\n\n5. In reply to F's question S stated that the US companies affected by the ENEX decision were Continental Oil, Gulf Gas (or oil) and Felly Oil from California.\n\n6. In reply to F's question S stated that he did not go to the French Club on Saturday July 18 with LDC because he was not feeling well. He added that because of his condition (flu) he was keeping himself away from his office; he was still not well (remark: true) but he felt much better.\n\n6. I asked F what he thought about the development of S's relationship with LDC. I said there was not much to think about, because LDC was getting all he wanted and it was obvious that we had no possibility of getting anything from S because he brought us in the picture at the time it would make no sense to try to change anything. I commented that it\nwas not his intention to cut us short, but to the contrary, he wanted to be of help to us. F calmly stated that S was still able to do that if he timely reported acquaintance with any other Sov official and follows our instruction for every further step he makes in relationship with such an official. F said that we could count on him.\n\n7. S stated after some thinking that he had connections in practically every branch of the Mexican government, but definitely had none in the Seguridad de Estado. F commented that this was understandable because the Security keeps itself separated from politicking which enables this organization to carry out its duties without interference of politicians. F added that the Security people are excellently trained and were amazingly efficient in their work. It was evident that F's statements left S worried. F took advantage of the silence and added as an afterthought that in his opinion it would be wise if S thinned his meets with LOG to 2, maximum 3, per month.\n\n8. F changed his previously prearranged meet with S from Sat July 19 to Monday July 21 at 2000 hrs. S did not have his notebook with him and he assured F that he would not forget it. This meet lasted 30 min.\n\nP.S. S did not show up on July 21 meet.\nPETROLEOS MEXICANOS\n\nPlaticando con el se\u00f1or Julian Carrillo Flores, hermano del Sec. de Relaciones Exteriores, Lic. Antonio Carrillo Flores, sobre la cancelaci\u00f3n de todos los contratos de extranjeros que efectuaban con Petroleos Mexicanos, fue por iniciativa del director actual, Ing. Reyes Heroles y no de la presidencia.\n\nDesde luego, lleva la aprobaci\u00f3n del se\u00f1or Presidente D\u00edaz Ordaz de que ninguna rama extranjera tenga nada que ver con el petr\u00f3leo de la naci\u00f3n. No fue iniciativa de la Presidencia sino todo se prepar\u00f3 dentro de Petroleos Mexicanos especialmente El se\u00f1or Reyes Heroles, Lic. Sergio Cenhusa y el Lic. Carlos Zorrilla De La Garza Evia, subdirector de Finanzas. El Lic. Jesus Reyes Heroles y el Lic. Carlos Zorrilla De La Garza son los principales responsables y se inclinan mucho hacia la mexicanizaci\u00f3n de todo en Petroleos Mexicanos.\n\nEmbajada de la Rep\u00fablica de China\n\nMinistro Plenipotenciario - Consejero del Embajador, Ch\u00edn-Ision Tang:\n\nPl\u00e1tique con el sr. Tang sobre el problema de Ruso-Chino en la frontera del r\u00edo Usuri Isla de Dalnsei llamada en Chino Tsenpa.\n\nEl caso que las Tse-tung en realidad necesita tanto una diversi\u00f3n de sus problemas internos como consolidar el Ej\u00e9rcito Rojo un enemigo para unir al pueblo. Ya que los Estados Unidos es un cuento viejo y que no amenazan sus fronteras, el m\u00e1s l\u00f3gico es la Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica. Los terrenos que reclama son realmente Chinos pues en el a\u00f1o 1847 Zar Nicol\u00e1s I logr\u00f3 anexar a Rusia la cuenca del r\u00edo Amur y en el a\u00f1o 1853 arrancaron a China la margen norte del mismo r\u00edo. Las Tse-tung ya es m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de lo que pensaba y para el ya no hay retorno. Si se recrudece, pierde tanto al Ej\u00e9rcito Rojo as\u00ed como la uni\u00f3n del mismo pueblo. Ahora tiene que seguir adelante y solo que el camino que indica a la guerra, en el trato de San Petersburgo Rusia est\u00e1 m\u00e1s de otro 700 kil\u00f3metros cuadrados de la China occidental de la provincia de Sinkiang. As\u00ed que en realidad el problema de la isla de Chensao no est\u00e1 circunscrito a ella, que en s\u00ed no vale la pena.\n\nLe pregunto a que lado est\u00e1n ellos en este problema y el me respondi\u00f3: \"el lado que m\u00e1s nos convenga\". Le dije que el lado de Tse-tung tiene un aliado y con el jefe volver\u00e1n a China. Ellos tienen un departamento estrat\u00e9gico que estudia con quien y cuando es el mejor tiempo de regresar y con quienes m\u00e1s les conviene.\nLos terrenos que pide Mao Tse-tung de Rusia\n\nNicol\u00e1s Muraviev, en representaci\u00f3n de Zar Nicol\u00e1s I\n1840-47 anexa hasta el r\u00edo Azur.\n1853 anexan la margen norte del r\u00edo.\n\n( La superficie de la cuenca es de unos 400 mil kil\u00f3metros cuadrados.) Incluye el puerto de Vladivostok, el mar de Jap\u00f3n y al oeste, el propio r\u00edo Ussuri.\n1864 anexan 440 mil kil\u00f3metros cuadrados de la China occidental.\n1881, anexan 70 mil kil\u00f3metros cuadrados del trato de San Petersburgo.\n(Provincia China de Sinkiang)\n\nDespu\u00e9s de la Primera Guerra Mundial Rusia se echa sobre Mongolia y se posesiona de la parte de Manchuria.\n\n1954 Mao Tse-tung pide al gobierno Ruso, Nikita Kruschev que regresen los terrenos que les prometi\u00f3 Lenin regresar.\n\nRusia se niega! He aqu\u00ed la furia de Mao Tse-tung.\nSECRET\n\nDO DOCUMENT EXTRACT\n\nTHE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SUBJECT OF THIS 201 DOSSIER HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM ANOTHER OFFICIAL DO FILE. PERSONS PERFORMING NAME TRACES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE DOCUMENT FROM WHICH THIS EXTRACT WAS PREPARED CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT AND SHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM IP/FILES.\n\nLOGINOV, VALENTIN\n201-0235412\n750-610-001\n018-921311\n30 SEP 76\n\nREPLACED OLEG MARSHOVICH NECHIPORENKO AT SOVIET EMBASSY, MEXICO CITY AUG 65\n\nDATE 06 DEC 76\n09456506\n\nSECRET\nF2 IMPDET CL NY 054979\n201-385412\nAugust 26, 1969.\n\nContact Report\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13, 230).\nDate of Meet: August 26 at Chez Rene at 1400 hrs\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and S came on time. The meet lasted two hours and 30 minutes.\n\n2. S apologized for not bringing the copy of the report he gave to AEDIEHARD; he did not think of it this morning when he left the house.\n\n3. I told S that the fact that AEDIEHARD would remain here at least five additional months did not please me, because I was not able to let the things go the way they were going until now and be just an observer. In reply to my questions S stated he was ready and determined to anything we tell him to do; he is willing to drop the association with AEDIEHARD; he is equally ready to do or tell AEDIEHARD anything we instruct him even if it was certain that AEDIEHARD would drop him; he is willing to go through any doings we consider necessary. I believe S was sincere in his statements.\n\n4. I told S not to call A under any circumstances before their next meet (Sept 10); keep away from the Chinese Emb; if he gets the add from Lau Restaurant S can advise JOS by phone; take proof of the article as was promised but avoid any comm whatsoever; if Josephine feels like going to the French Club on Sat (Aug 30) S can go with her, but I see no point in him going along alone. S stated that he understood what he was told and he would not do a move without checking with me.\n\n5. S asked in a matter of fact tone that he would like to know where he stood with us; did we want him to carry out the work we request for patriotic reasons; do we intend give him a salary or make a worthwhile present. I told him that he can rest sure that we realized that he was not in a financial position to be able to work out of patriotic feelings, and consequently he would be paid for his work as much as it is worth to us.\n\n6. No next incident: According to the statement of Dr Enrique BOLANOS Cacho, cousin of GDO with whom GDO plays domino every Tuesday.\nat Loa Pinos, L. Echevarria is the man; the race narrowed to 2 persons, Echevarria and Ortie Mena; Mena is out because of reasons of health. The statement was made Sunday to ING. ESPZJO3 and S got it from BARRIOS Gomez Monday afternoon. (Note I phoned to S Monday morning and he did have any news on this topic.)\n\nB'Fernald\nSubject: Jimmy SANORI (P-13,630) Report on His Meet\nwith AEDIEHARD (P-11,712) on Aug 25 at Samborsa-San Angel at 2000 hrs\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and it lasted 90 minutes. No changes in\nthe pattern of meeting and A came on time.\n\nTHEIR NEXT MEET: Sept 10 at the same place at 2000 hrs.\nS was invited to come on Sat at 1030 hrs to\nthe French Club with Josephine. S not sure he\nwill go.\n\n2. A apologized for not going to Cuautla on Aug 16. Lots of nice\nwords about thinking about S and Josephine all day that rainy day.\n\n3. A had a surprise for S; few days ago he received orders to remain\nin Mexico at least 5 months more (sic). When S asked was he not pleased with\nthe order, A stated that he was practically packed up and he had made\nplans regarding the places he wanted to visit and it was pleasure in\nunpacking and so much less he liked the idea of cancelling his plans.\nS asked several questions about A's wife and A was giving normal answers.\nAt no time did A belittle his wife and he stated that she was 40 years old.\n\n4. S handed to A a written report on what he accomplished with the\nChinese. A thanked for the same and told S to get the article published\nby all the means; do all possible to get the ad from the Luau Restaurant;\nkeep in touch with WONG or TANG but make sure there is a bona fide reason\nto go to see them, example, to tell them that the ad was obtained, show\nthem the script of the article before it is published and similar; be very\ncareful because Chinese are highly suspicious people.\n\n5. Then, A asked S why TANG was not listed in the Dip List. S stated\nthat it was evident from TANG's calling card that he just recently arrived\nhere. A accepted the explanation and told S that WONG was listed in the\nDip List as a counselor and that he (A) had confused TANG with WONG and\nthat it was WONG who spoke Russian.\n\n6. At this point A handed to S an envelope containing $500 and\nhe told S he wanted him to have that money for accidental expenses.\nwhile calling info for A. S pretended he was hesitant to receive money but did not drag the story long (from fear that A might change his mind).\n\n7. After the brief \"ceremony\" about giving and accepting the money A asked S did he have any news about the US Embassy Phone Directory. S reminded A that he told at their last meet that he had no way of getting it. A asked S did he know anybody working in the US USIS. When S answered that he did not think so A told him there was a number of girls working for USIS, they work on the 3rd floor (of the Emb building) and several of them live in the Hotel Geneva; they carry out some propaganda; A is not sure \"how far\" can one get with them (in terms of having good time), but there is no problem of getting them (although, the interest is limited to one girl) to go out for dinner and dancing. This is something S should look into.\n\nS commented to the effect did A have an idea how much it takes to take a chick like those for an evening of good time; such a bill runs about MN 700. A replied that money was no problem; if S lines up something it is enough if he phones him a day earlier and he will bring him the money.\n\n8. At this point A gave S the following instruction: If S ever needs something from A, as money, or he has something for A he should call the Emb and state that he wants to speak to Vladimir of the Consulate and stress that it was Vladimir calling. If A is in his office he will take the phone and there will be \"just mucho gusto de saludarle\" from both sides. If A is not there he(S) is to request to give the message that Vladimir called. The call should be made in the morning if possible. Regardless, whether S gets to speak to A or not he is to go the same evening at 2000 hrs to their meet place at Samborne-San Angel.\n\n9. S he would see what could be done and asked A was it possible that he was not able to do anything about the platinum. A apologised that it skipped his memory to tell S that he spoke to their Commercial Counselor Viktor IVANOV (full name mentioned by A) about the matter and that VI wanted first to know through which Swiss bank would the transaction be carried out; terms of the deal the buyers propose and be advised that Swiss were not interest in any deals which would be less than 1 million US Dollars. As soon as S submits the info, S and IVANOV will start working on the deal; if IVANOV leaves before the deal is closed it will not\naffect the deal because ITAROV will be able to back it in Moscow. S commented that it sounded good and that both of them will make a nice sum of money. With a smile on his face A told S that he did not want any money because he had all the money he wanted. A commented that this was the case which makes it evident that they were in position to help each other: A facilitates the platinum deal for S and S get hold of a girl who can bring out the phone directory for couple of hours.\n\n10. A asked the regular question as to who will be the next President of Mexico. S told him it will be Luis Echevarria, but this is still not positive. A did not ask for the source of info.\n\n11. S asked A who was the girl in the restaurant he waved to and she waved back. S stated it was the girl with whom he played tennis.\n\n12. S was not able to recall one more thing A asked him to do or find info about.\n\n13. The meet ended with a talk about birthdays. A has his on Dec 25 and his wife earlier. A made it known that his wife would accept with pleasure a birthday present as a bracelet.\nSubject: V. Lentin SOLOV (P-11, 927)\n\n1. In accordance with arrangements made in my presence of EHP during the previous meet with Source, engineer Manuel KOSTONI on his wife has invited Subject and his wife ANNA KOSTONI SOLOV for a drink on Sunday Nov 1 at 1900 hrs. Source and wife were also invited. This get-together lasted 3 - 3\u00bd hours.\n\n2. The party was pleasant and Subject appeared satisfied to be able to have somebody with whom he could speak his language. He was quite talkative, while his wife was rather reserved. Nevertheless, then Source stated that on Nov 3 will be 13 years since he arrived in Mexico and wanted to celebrate the occasion with a dinner at his place and have the same company together. Subject and his wife commented that the celebration would have to be postponed, because Anna de KOSTONI and immovable Sokolov will be on a business trip. They both accept the invitation for the dinner to take place a day or 2 after Anna KOSTONI and SOLOV return to town.\n\n3. It was interesting to note that Subject and his wife Lyudmila stated that ANNA KOSTONI lived in Moscow in the same building or the same complex of buildings and that they were very close friends. Lyudmila went on to say that ANNA KOSTONI daughter was now 18 of age and that she was outright a beauty. ANNA KOSTONI was proud about the fact that his daughter was admitted to the Institute (Source believes: of Technology) in Moscow. Subject and his wife also stated that ANNA KOSTONI was doing fine back home, but no details were mentioned as to what.\nSubject spoke about the place he was living in, and added that there were several few families living in the same building. He started the listing with HANASHI and source instructed by asking that he knew HANASHI and explained how he got to know him. Source went on to say that in connection with the same job he got to know HANASHI. Subject and wife commented that HANASHI had left PRC some time ago. Source said he did not know it, because he believed that HANASHI would remain here until he completed a 5-year stay and he did not believe that the 5 years already passed. Subject and wife said they did not know how long he was here but were positive that he left PRC.\n\nSubject asked Source whom else did he know in the Sov Emb. Source stated that he presently knew very few because a number of his friends left. He mentioned he knew CHINASHI, whom he liked as a person. There were no comments from Subject and his wife. Then source stated that he also knew HANASHI but found it difficult to get closer relationship with him \"because he is a dry person\". Subject started smiling and nodding his head in sign of approval, but Subject's wife remained motionless and looked reproachfully at her husband.\n\nSubject's wife spoke that the fact of having their own car here was of great advantage for her, because \"the Embassy has strongly recommended to wives of Sov officials never to use taxis which obliges them to wait for their husbands or embassy chauffeurs to take them around to for shopping or social visits\".\n\nSource considers Subject to be a single man, with bit a moment, talkative, firmly attached to the region despite from which\nhe comes, inclined to wish to encourage imaginations about the progress in the field, but in the field of personal interest. His wife acts as an aristocrat, dresses according to fashion (not Sov) and feels self-important. No doubt she has her eye on luxury.\n\n8. Except for the fact that they mentioned they had a 12-year-old son Sergey, there was no mention of other children nor any problems in connection with children.\n\n[Handwritten note:]\n\nI.2. Attached is subject address and phone as he personally wrote it for source. [Handwritten note:]\n\n[Handwritten note:]\n\nalready filed as sample.\nSECRET\n\nSoviet Operational Contacts:\n\nAKHUNOFF made the following contacts concerning what appeared to her to be operational contacts and/or nodes operated by Soviet intelligence officers in Mexico:\n\nFabricating conducted 23-26 April 1970:\n\nLOGINOV - During the affair between AKHUNOFF and LOGINOV, they went to the movies once or twice a week, the Futurama and Cine Kod being the theaters most frequently attended. LOGINOV always made some sort of contact during these outings, according to AKHUNOFF. She stated that he usually left his seat about 2300 hours and went out to the lobby for some time. She did not know where the contacts were actually made.\n\nOnce she and LOGINOV encountered, apparently accidentally, outside the Cine Kod theater, a Mexican Army Colonel, who was introduced to her by LOGINOV as \"Col. Sergio.\" In this instance LOGINOV did not excuse himself to have a private conversation with the Mexican. \"Col. Sergio\" was described by AKHUNOFF as about 40, tall, no mustache or glasses, thick, curly hair, appeared to be of Spanish descent. The woman with \"Col. Sergio\" appeared to be about 25 years old and was introduced as his wife (which AKHUNOFF doubted because, as she put it, he didn't treat her as one would a wife, but rather as a mistress). AKHUNOFF knew nothing more about this Mexican and never saw him again.\n\nOn another occasion, LOGINOV and AKHUNOFF met an American in front of the Futurama theater. LOGINOV introduced him to her as \"Col. Michael.\" AKHUNOFF stated that he was dressed in civilian clothes. He\nSECRET\n\nhad blond hair, was of medium height, no glasses, large grey eyes\n(AKIMOV thought him quite attractive). LOKHIN told \"Michael\" that he\nwould call him the next day on urgent business. \"Michael\" was alone.\n\nAKIMOV stated that they did not have a private conversation. She\nestimated this encounter took place about September 1959.\n\nGOLUSHOV - AKIMOV stated that GOLUSHOV used her in the\nsame manner, i.e., took her about 3 times in all to Cine Chapultepec, then\nleft her during the movie to make some sort of contact.\n\nDebriefing conducted 12-16 Nov 1970:\n\nConcerning Soviet Contacts in the Mexican Police: AKIMOV\nstated that she overheard GOLUSHOV and LOKHIN talk about many contacts which\nthey had in the police here. She said she had also overheard GOLUSHOV,\nLOKHIN, and GOLUSHOV talk about how many good police contacts the Soviets\nhave. However, each specific example which AKIMOV could give concerned\nsome non-operational favor which the Soviets could get taken care of, e.g.,\nwhen the Soviets wanted to get something through Adunan; when some Soviet\nwas missing and police cooperation was needed; getting advance notice when\nsome demonstration hostile to the Soviets was about to take place, etc.\n\nShe was not able to recall any hints that Soviets had operational contacts\nin the police; agents reporting on what the police were doing; assets who\nassisted Soviets operationally in some way. However, AKIMOV thought\nthe Soviets probably have such assets.\n\nConcerning Soviet contacts in West German Police: AKIMOV\nrecalled that when she went to Germany as interpreter for Soviet surgeon\nand textbook writer, Poblo AKIMOV, in January 1959 (they went to Cologne\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nWest Germany on Commercial Ministry business), the Soviet Ambassador in\nWest Germany stated that the Embassy had some pull points within the West\nGerman police who helped them to protect the Soviets (in context that it\nwas dangerous times; some Soviet official could be kidnapped by the enemy,\netc.) AEIDRIFF noted that KORUSKIN was quite old and very pro-regime.\n\nMiscellaneous operational notes - AEIDRIFF had no knowledge\nof Soviet safe houses or safe apartments. She stated that many Soviet\nvisitors stayed at the Hotel Vierjahres or in two other hotels near the\nSoviet Embassy (she couldn't remember names). She did not know whether the\nSoviets had any sort of special arrangement or contacts in these hotels.\n\nAEIDRIFF stated that she had attended several parties at\nwhich Mexicans also were present (she recalled specifically parties at the\nhomes of KORUSKIN, PAULIN, LOGINOV) and in each instance the Soviet\nofficer, at some point during the evening, had a private conversation with\na Mexican guest. (Unfortunately, AEIDRIFF was unable to recall the names\nof any of the Mexicans she met on these occasions, and of course there is\nno way of knowing whether such private conversations were operational\nmeetings.) AEIDRIFF commented that at purely Soviet parties, husbands all\nways went off together and talked business, and if wives approached, they\nstopped their conversation.\n\nDebriefing conducted 1-5 June 1970:\n\nKORUSKIN - AEIDRIFF commented that she thought KORUSKIN\nmade operational meetings in the Brezen Bar, since she often saw him\nsitting in that bar, wearing dark glasses and trying to look inconspicuous.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n(ADEIRIFF sometimes passed by this box and would look inside, although she never used it.)\n\nKUPLYAKOV - Possible PCI Contact - ADEIRIFF stated that she was told by Daniel Montiel (Daniel HERN\u00c1NDEZ Montiel, 201-636351), the Soviet's chauffeur, that his brother, who is a Central Committee member of the PCI and who worked on the PCI publication \"La Voz de M\u00e9xico,\" was in contact with KUPLYAKOV. In addition, ADEIRIFF stated that she believed Armando VERDUGO (iden with Armando MART\u00cdNEZ Verdugo, 201-851726) had an uncle, also named Armando VERDUGO, who is First Secretary of the PCI and who is in contact with KUPLYAKOV. At least this was strongly inferred by Montiel, according to ADEIRIFF. (Editor note: Armando MART\u00cdNEZ Verdugo, 201-636351, who is brother of Armando, is First Secretary of PCI).\n\nADEIRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV always seemed to be very interested in and knowledgeable of what appeared in \"La Voz de M\u00e9xico\" and in the PCI publication \"La \u00c9poca.\" She stated that, in general, KUPLYAKOV paid so much attention to local politics and seemed to be so well informed on PCI matters that she felt certain he had something to do with the PCI.\n\nADEIRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV's wife was a good friend of Salvador GONZ\u00c1LEZ Harin, head of the Fondo de Cultura Popular. GONZ\u00c1LEZ' wife works in the Museum of Anthropology. GONZ\u00c1LEZ sold a lot of Soviet books, according to ADEIRIFF, and for that reason was in contact with KUPLYAKOV, but she commented that GONZ\u00c1LEZ may also have been utilized by KUPLYAKOV in some other operational way. Most of KUPLYAKOV's contacts seem to be journalists. (There were the people ADEIRIFF saw talking to him at receptions, etc.).\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n-5-\n\nAMHERST stated that Leopoldo ARNAL, whose wife is the daughter of David Alfredo SQUIRRELS, is another Soviet agent who is handled by KUPINAKOV (she heard VASOVSKY talk about this). AMHERST said that ARNAL works with Eduardo ARNUL (economic consultant for \"Minera Continental, S.A.\", mentioned in Commercial Office). She also stated she knew that ARNAL went at times to the Embassy to see KUPINAKOV. AMHERST said that ARNAL goes to Moscow every year or so. (ARNAL identical with Leopoldo ARNAL Faster, 201-117559).\nSECRET\n\nDebriefing conducted 23-25 April 1970: ALEKSEEV stated that\n\nLOKHIN went out at nights often during this period and told her it was\nto make \"contacts.\" LOKHIN also stated that his work during this period\nwas some of the most dangerous he had ever done. ALEKSEEV was certain\nthat these \"contacts\" involved in student riots. ALEKSEEV related that\nonce at Auto Club, LOKHIN made a meeting with a group of youths who were\nin another car (Falcon). Another time, some 2 or 3 days later, LOKHIN\nhad KITOPOLSKY give him some shotguns which KITOPOLSKY had charge of.\nLOKHIN got the guns about 2200 or 2300; the guns were returned the next\nmorning. Others who seemed to be going out all the time at night during\nthe student riots (and talking about their meetings in general the next\nmorning) were LOKHIN, KONNOUSHKIN, NIKIFOROV. ALEKSEEV never heard\nmention of money being passed during this period (i.e., to Soviet assets\ninvolved in riots) nor any mention of any names or positions of assets\n(This not in agreement with some of Don James info). GORSHKOV seemed to be\ninvolved also.\n\nDebriefing conducted 12-16 May 1970: ALEKSEEV was again\nquestioned on her knowledge of Soviet activities during the 1958 student\ndisorders. She reported that all she really knew was that the Soviets were\nvery busy during this period; that LOKHIN told her he was going out every\nnight to make \"contacts;\" that she overheard Soviet case officers talking\nat various times during this period to effect that they very busy, making\nmany contacts; that the situation was potentially explosive and a dangerous\ntime for them to be making such contacts. ALEKSEEV told us was with LOKHIN\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n-7-\n\nwhen he met with some \"youths\" in private conversations. However, ACHIRIFF stated she did not ever hear any mention of any names of Soviet contacts in relation with the student disorders, any mention of the level of involvement of these contacts in the student organizations, any mention of Soviet guidance to the student movement, financing of the student movement, or the like. She really doesn't know that the Soviets had any contacts with direct access to information to these activities, but she strongly assures that they did, based on their level of activity and the strong tenor that LOGINOV and other case officers gave to the idea that the contacts they were making were dangerous ones for them to be seen with during this period.\n\nDebriefing conducted 3-6 June 1972: ACHIRIFF questioned re 1958 student disorders again, for clarification previously reported details. She stated that the Soviets had some different types of rifles in the Commercial Office which served as samples of guns which they were trying to sell commercially in Mexico. One night about 11 o'clock, during the period of student riots, LOGINOV came to the Commercial Office with MITROFAN (ACHIRIFF was there watching TV). They got \"some\" rifles - ACHIRIFF could not see how many or what kind. They took them out in some sort of bags. The next morning \"some\" rifles were returned to the Commercial Office, but ACHIRIFF doesn't know whether all of them were brought back. She doesn't know whether or not LOGINOV might have been duty officer for the Embassy for that night.\n\nACHIRIFF stated that MITROFAN's trip back to the USSR during the 1958 riots may well have been to report on the riots. However, she didn't know that this was the case and never specifically told her so.\n\nSECRET\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Conversation with Ed ELLY with USIS\n\nDATE: 3 December 1969\n\n1. On 3 December 1969 I had a brief conversation with Ed ELLY to find out if he knew any of the Soviets at the French Club, and to brief him on these individuals. He did not know either CHERNYSHEV (P-13,042) or SHVCHINKO (P-13,623) by name and when I showed him pictures, he said that he did not recognize them by sight either. Since he is a relatively good player and they are relatively poor, it is not likely that they would play together. He said, however, that he would keep his eyes open for them and would try to identify some of the contacts they appear to be making at the French Club. I explained to him who the two Soviets were and why we were interested in them, and he said that he would be only too happy to do what he could.\n\n2. I also asked him about Gloria PIETO (P-13,223) and showed him a picture of her, but while he thinks he may have seen her, he does not know her. He will check with his wife who may very well know her since she is a regular player and probably more or less in the same league with Gloria. I told ELLY that Gloria had been very close to LOGINOV (P-11,712) and that I was interested to find out if she would now, since he has departed, transfer her attention to one of the other Soviets. (I was specifically interested in finding out whether or not Gloria and CHERNYSHEV had met on the morning of 29 November as indicated by LOGINOV, but ELLY had not been at the French Club that morning.)\n\n3. ELLY commented that he had found it hard to make contacts at sports clubs in Mexico than in other countries. Mexicans were particularly difficult to become friendly with and it was not at all uncommon to have a tennis match with no personal contact whatsoever. He said, however, that he thought the French Club was better than most in Mexico City. Even though the people at the French club were rather clanish, it was easier to get to know them there than, for example, at Chapultepec.\n\nSECRET\n\nVincent P. RIZZUTO\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Recruitment of Dianne de la Vega, 31 Oct 69\n\n1 November 1969\n\nF. 11, 712\n\nsay about anything, much whether it be American or Russian. He is only interested in booze and women. I would say this is a pretty accurate description of TUCHIN (who is now gone--replaced by EFLUTE's friend PERFILIEV).\n\n5. Subject has also met LOGINOV, for whom she did not have too much respect. She didn't think him very smart, and he was constantly saying foolish things against the United States. When I asked if LOGINOV had ever made a pass at her, she said no, but then she never saw him when his wife was not along. (Again, she has come up with a pretty accurate thumbnail description.)\n\n6. Getting back to SARATOV, they have remained good friends (since the Olympics, and the friendship extends to SARATOV's wife. Subject and Natasha are very friendly, and I would like to keep it this way, for several reasons. I don't think there has been any sex between Subject and SARATOV (although I could be wrong, and I will ask, and I think get the truth). Subject is well aware of the friction between SARATOV and wife, and has a matter of fact Natasha has said quite openly that she intends to leave SARATOV in about a year. They have an 11-year-old son to whom she is very attached, and since he must return to the USSR to complete his schooling, she is going to return with him. In effect, she has chosen her son over her husband. Subject does not know whether Natasha's overly close attachment to her son (she won't go out in the evening until he is in bed, etc.) is the result of SARATOV's playing around, or vice-versa, but it is a fact, and it irritates the hell out of SARATOV. On the other hand, Natasha is attractive, intelligent, and if anything more firmly attached to the Soviet Union than SARATOV himself. Recently she offered to give Subject Russian lessons. Since Subject is the type of person that can't easily do something like that even though it has real practical use,\nContact Report\n\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13,830)\n\nDate/Place of Meet: Expxx Oct 7 at Chas Rene East at 1414 hrs.\n\n1. The meet was arranged by phone and S came about 14 min late.\n   NEXT MEET: Oct 10 (Friday) Insurgentes Sur & Extremadura\n   at 1100 hrs.\n\n2. According to S his last meet with AEDIEHARD was on Aug 25. A had\n   arranged a meet with S for Sept 10, but A did not come to that meet. Two\n   days later, i.e. after he did not come to the scheduled meet A phoned to\n   S' apt in the afternoon when he was not home and after exchange of nice\n   words with Josephine he told her that he was not able to keep his ap-\n   pointment with S two days ago and he wanted to apologize for not showing\n   up and that he would ring up S in a day or two. Because there were no calls\n   from A for few days (sic), S decided to give him a ring and advise him\n   that he had something for him, namely, S had in his possession a duplicated\n   copy of an \"Agreement\" concerning the Platinum deal. As it is evident\n   from the mentioned copy of the Agreement the same was signed and the\n   Buyer's Agent signature was legalized by the U.S. Consul in Mexico City\n   on Sept 25.\n\n3. Although, this story lacks accuracy in terms of dates, it is\n   substantially different from the one S gave to PERNALD on Sept 12, the\n   date of their last personal meet. Inspite of the vagueness concerning\n   the dates and absence of details, this story appears to be much closer\n   to truth, than the version of Sept 12.\n\n4. S gave me for copying a technical copy of the above mentioned\n   Agreement concerning the Platinum transaction. As is evident from the\n   wording of the Agreement S would have nothing to do with Buyer or Buyer's\n   Agent. The Agreement places S on the Seller's side or at the best makes\n   him middle man between the actual Seller and Buyer's Agent. P did not\n   read the Agreement in the restaurant (during the meet) and made no com-\n   ments with regard to the Platinum transaction as such.\n5. S asked P should he ring up A from the restaurant to ask for a meet with him. P told S that A had left or was about to take off the same afternoon. Instead of commenting on the fact the A left without even indicating to S that he might leave, S stated that this situation was giving him an opportunity to find out for us who was A's replacement. P told him that it was a common knowledge as to who was A's replacement and that the only thing to ascertain positively was whether A had dropped him (S) or the developments prevented A from meeting with S.\n\n6. Therefore, P suggested to S to phone to the Sov Emb by using the duple talk (code) which A gave him and see what happens. If another person tells him that A left Mexico, S should ask how was he to go about a transaction he intimated with A. If the answering person insists in knowing what was it about, which is doubtful, S should limit himself to the statement that it is a commercial matter involving large amount of money, and it reached the stage that an action should be taken.\n\n7. S promised to phone to the Sov Emb on Oct 8 about 1000 hrs and P told him that he would give him a ring about 1500 hrs.\n\n8. P told S that he intended to discuss a serious matter with him but did not have all the facts on hand as yet. P added that he would have all the facts the latest Thursday Oct 9 and he asked S to come on Friday Oct 10 to the place mentioned in para 1 above at 1100 hrs and that they would go to an adequate place for such a conversation. S offered that the conv could be held in his apt and P told that it would be against our practices.\n\n9. As far as his present activity was concerned, S stated that he was doing a lot of running in connection with his attempt to sell the unfinished hotel on the Calate Beach in Acapulco.\n\nBHPernald\nCOUNTRY OF MEXICO\nCITY OF MEXICO, D.F.\n\nAGREEMENT\n\nTHIS AGREEMENT made as of the date of the signatures hereto, by and between the undersigned SELLER'S AGENT, as agent for an undisclosed Foreign Principal, hereinafter referred to as SELLER, and the undersigned BUYER'S AGENT, as agent for another undisclosed Foreign Principal, hereinafter referred to as BUYER;\n\nWHEREAS, Seller's Agent represents, as authorized agent, a Foreign Principal or entity, who are the owners of certain amounts of Platinum and also represents that Seller's Agent, being an American citizen, has no rights, title or interest, either legal or equitable in and to said Platinum, and is acting as Agent solely for a commission; and\n\nWHEREAS, Buyer's Agent represents that his principal desires to purchase Platinum from a Foreign Principal or entity, being a domestic American company, has no rights, title or interest, either legal or equitable in and to said Platinum, and is acting as Agent solely for a commission;\n\nNOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants and conditions hereinafter contained, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties as follows:\n\n(a) Seller's Agent agrees to sell and Buyer's Agent agrees to purchase approximately One Hundred Thousand (100,000) troy ounces of Platinum core or less in shipments of Twenty Thousand (20,000) ounces monthly, priced on the basis of 1000 fineness, the same to be a transaction through a mutually acceptable bank in Zurich, Switzerland.\n\n(b) In connection with the said purchase and sale, the following procedure shall be followed:\n\n(1) Upon the execution of this agreement, the Buyer's Agent shall take immediate steps to cause to be issued to the Foreign Commercial Bank, Bellevuestrasse 82, Zurich, Switzerland, a divisible, transferrable, irrevocable, unconditional and without recourse, letter of credit payable in U.S. currency, in an amount sufficient to purchase the first shipment of Twenty Thousand (20,000) troy ounces of Platinum issued by a bank acceptable to Seller's Agent. The said letter of credit shall be in the form set forth, attached hereto and made a part hereof; a non-negotiable copy of the letter of credit so posted shall be furnished to Seller's Agent to examine.\n\n(2) Ten (10) banking days herefrom is granted to Buyer's Agent to deposit said letter of credit from the date of acceptance of this agreement and signature thereof.\n(3) Seller's Agent shall deliver the first shipment and the documents at the Port of a Commercial Bank, within twenty (20) banking days after the posting of the letter of credit and thereafter shall continue such deliveries until all of said Platinum has been delivered, such delivery of all of said Platinum to be completed within One Hundred Eighty (180) days after the posting of the letter of credit.\n\n(4) For the payment of such transaction, the Seller's Agent shall cause to be exhibited to the Buyer's Agent the documentation to be delivered to Buyer's Agent to effect said sale, to-wit: (a) Warehouse receipt, (b) Intransit permit and (c) Assay report;\n\n(5) Thereupon, the Buyer's Agent shall provide Seller's Agent with satisfactory evidence of insurance by which the Seller's Agent and his principals are protected against all hazards from the loss of said Platinum during the time it is being assayed by Buyer's Agent's assayer (should Buyer's Agent desire an assay by his assayer) and extend to the time of payment as herein provided, it being understood that legal title shall not pass to Buyer's Agent or his principals until payment in full has been made to Seller's Agent;\n\n(6) Payment shall be made by the said bank from the letter of credit on deposit within five (5) banking days from the date of delivery of the Platinum to the bank in Zurich, Switzerland, and payment shall be made on the basis of the accompanying assay certificates provided, however, that within this five (5) banking day period Buyer's Agent may have the Platinum assayed by a recognized assayer of his own choosing, in which event the Seller's Agent shall have his representative of his choice on hand with the Buyer's assayer at the point of assay for the purpose of observing the assaying of any material which may be of any material in the subject of this agreement. If the parties hereto do not agree with the results of such assaying, then each may select an umpire and these two shall select a third umpire and the conclusion of any two of these umpires as to the value of the Platinum referred to herein shall bind the parties. Such umpire procedure shall be completed and a report made within the period not to exceed five (5) additional banking days. If this umpire procedure is used, and while it is being used, payment shall first be made immediately on the basis of Seller's Agent's assay, as to the undisputed amount, with the disputed amount to await payment until the umpire's report has been made, whereupon payment shall immediately be made on the umpire's report for the amount, if any be determined due by umpire's report. When no assay is requested by Buyer's Agent, payment shall be made immediately on the basis of the assay certificates which accompany the material. The expense of Buyer's assay shall be to the Buyer, and the cost, if any, of the umpires shall be paid equally by Buyer's and Seller's Agents.\n\n(7) Buyer's Agent shall assume the cost of packaging and freight insurance, transfer to airport and all responsibility of the Platinum once payment has been completed to Seller's Agent. At this point, Seller's Agent shall be completely free of any responsibility in regard to said Platinum.\n\n(c) It is specifically understood that neither the Seller's Agent nor the Buyer's Agent shall under any condition disclose to anyone, except the Seller's Agent's undisclosed principals and the Buyer's Agent's undisclosed principals respectively, the nature of this agreement.\n(d) This Agreement to the extent it contravenes any national or local government laws, ordinances or regulations of Switzerland or the United States of America, shall be deemed null and void.\n\n(e) Performance under this Agreement shall be excused for and so long as forces majeure, acts of God, strikes, war in which either country is involved, or any similar force majeure cause which may interfere with the performance beyond the control of the parties hereto.\n\n(f) Seller's Agent shall provide Buyer's Agent a warehouse receipt in-transit permit, and an assay report with each shipment.\n\n(g) All notices which may be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing by prepaid cable, airmail, or by personal service to Buyer's or to Seller's Agent at the address listed below.\n\n(h) The price of said Platinum shall be Ninety-five ($95.00) U.S. Dollars per Troy ounce per 1000 fine.\n\n(i) Seller's Agent expressly agrees that if Buyer's Agent shall have furnished a letter of credit as specified in sub-paragraphs (1) and (2) of Section b above, and Seller's Agent shall fail to deliver all of said Platinum as provided in sub-paragraph (3) of Section b above, and the documentation referred to in paragraph (4) of Section b above, then Buyer's Agent, at his option shall be entitled to cancel this contract and neither party shall have any further obligation hereunder.\n\nSeller's Agent\n\nBuyer's Agent\n\n[Signatures]\n\n[Stamp: American Consul]\nSUBJECT: LEBANON 1\n\nDATE, TIME, PLACE: 6 Oct. 1100-1200, JET Cafe.\n\n1. Subject arrived at the Cafe five minutes late (unusual for him) fairly bubbling over with \"good news\". Subject had a little difficulty getting to LOI's Embassy des edda at 1100 hrs. as he had planned. It seems that the neighbor with whom he had planned to leave his child was not at home and so he had to wait until his wife came home, at about 200 hrs. Subj arrived at the Embassy at about 2020 hrs where he was warmly greeted by LOI. After only a few words of greeting, Mrs. LOI fixed Subj a drink and a sandwich, and LOI excused himself saying he had to take care of the many guests and telling Subj to make himself at home, \"you are more or less one of us.\" It should be noted that LOI did not introduce anyone to Subj. Subj soon approached Yuri GORENISH and a rather long, innocuous conversation ensued. Michael P. DAVIDOVSKY approached the pair and was introduced to Subj by GORENISH. (Card attended.) Subj was very taken with DAVIDOVSKY's charm and simplicity and learned that the latter had at one time been a \"locksmith,\" (?) and having studied at the \"International Diplomatic Institute\" received this appointment as private secret to the ambassador.\n\n2. During one of Subj's free moments he approached Pavel KOVALYEV, whom he recognized from the army Day party which attended, but he could not recall his name. KOVALYEV said he thought he recognized Subj's face but could not place it. Subj then told him that his mother taught Spanish at the Embassy (actually Subj told me he is not sure she is still doing so.) KOVALYEV said he was interested in forming a small group to study Spanish and have Subj teach it and the latter heartily agreed to do so. KOVALYEV promised to phone Subj at the earliest opportunity. Subj asked KOVALYEV how the latter's could be addressed, i.e., what was his position at the Embassy? He replied that he was more or less attached to the military attach\u00e9's office.\n\n3. Subject not a young lady, Tanya LIT, and husband name unknown. They have been in Mexico for three months. Very little, if anything else, was said but Subj was impressed with the girl, physically, this is. Subj left the party around 2000, got a bear hug from LOI and was escorted to the door by KOVALYEV. Subj having only had two drinks while at the party went to Chili's but she was out, so he went elsewhere (no identification) where he spent the night \"talking.\"\nEn Honor del C\u00f3nsul de la Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica\n\nEl se\u00f1or Valentin S. Logunov, c\u00f3nsul de la Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica en M\u00e9xico, y su distinguida esposa Alejandra de Logunov, regresar\u00e1n en fecha pr\u00f3xima a su pa\u00eds; por ello un grupo de amigos ofrecieron en d\u00edas pasados una fiesta para despedirlos.\n\nLa cita fue ala en San \u00c1ngel, en la residencia del doctor Luis G\u00f3mez Correa quien junto con su esposa Silvia M. de G\u00f3mez atendieron a sus hu\u00e9spedes de maravilla.\n\nEsa noche la cena estuvo riqu\u00edsima... Platillos t\u00edpicos de los dos pa\u00edses, complementados con el tradicional vodka. M\u00fasica popular rusa ameniz\u00f3 la velada de la que se disfrut\u00f3 hasta las primeras horas del domingo.\n\n1. Mercedes Pinto, Gloria Z. de Pinto y Alejandra de Longunov.\n2. Beatriz Bacon\n3. Ralph Wigan.\n4. El anfitr\u00f3n de esa noche doctor Luis G\u00f3mez Correa con el agasajado se\u00f1or Valentin S. Longunov y don Tomas Lopez Sanchez.\n5. Lourdes Aguilar, CONTENTISIMA, toda la noche con ella Manuel Hernandez.\n6. FLASH!!! Virginia Fernandez de Aguilar y Ruth B. de Wigan.\n7. Doctor Jose Maria Pinto y Adrian Aguilar.\n8. \u00a1MIRADITAS! de... Guillermo Marcos a Vicky Aguilar.\nOctober 4, 1963.\n\nContact Report\n\nSubject: LIGONAL-1 (P-6903)\n\nDate/Place of Meet: Oct 3 at Kent, Hoyt at 1330 hrs.\n\n1. Prearranged meet to which L-1 came 10 min. early.\n   Next meet: October 16 at the same place at 1430 hrs.\n\n2. Since our last meet (Sept 19) L-1 had not seen LIGONAL-1 who in two instances apologized (2-3 days after the class was due) for not holding the class because he was not feeling well. In both cases it was obvious to L-1 that he was dead drunk when he phoned. In view of the fact that LIGONAL-1 did not phone to L-1 for a whole week, L-1 gave him a ring on Oct 2 and he promised to give a lesson to L-1 at 1630 hrs of Oct 3.\n\n3. L-1 explained me that his working schedule in the new scholar year keeps him busy in the morning and the afternoon, except Friday afternoons, which makes it difficult on him to be free to tie himself twice a week for LIGONAL-1's class which most of the time does not take place. L-1 felt that nothing would be lost if he reduced the Russian language classes to one per week, which would be more than he ever actually had in the past. I told him to go ahead and suit himself.\n\n4. I told L-1 that AEDISHARD was scheduled to leave in about a week and it would be interesting to ascertain whether LIGONAL-1 knew it. L-1 will show to LIGONAL-1 the Excelior of Sept 25 in which the Sov Emb farewell party was announced. L-1 felt bad about the fact that he did not even have a chance to see AEDISHARD face to face.\n\n5. L-1 asked could he remind LIGONAL-1 that he promised to make some arrangements which would enable L-1 to meet Alla (GLEPOVA P-13, 462/) and suggest that AEDISHARD's departure was opening the possibility to do something along that line. I told L-1 that there was no reason to expect that LIGONAL-1 would accomplish anything, but L-1 should be after him on the basis of his former promise.\n6. I told L-1 that he should tell LIRACON-1 that a person he knew quite well 3-4 years ago returned to the US Embassy and that this American Embassy official was a very close friend of a dear friend of his (L-1). I explained to L-1 that such news would certainly please LIRACON-1 for several obvious reasons, but it was more important to ascertain whether LIRACON-1 would relay such news to some of his Sov acquaintances. If it happens that ARDINARD's replacement or another Sov official attempt to contact L-1 through LIRACON-1, it would be an indication that LIRACON-1 got the news of L-1's US Embassy contact. L-1 liked the idea and will give the story to LIRACON-1.\n\n7. At this point it may be recalled that L-1 had met NECHIPORENKO (P-7442) at the time he had met YATSEV.\n\n8. Comment by BHP:\n\nIn view of the fact that NECHIPORENKO by himself is a determined KGB case officer who is aggressive in pursuing American targets, I felt that we stand to lose nothing by adding to L-1 a label of having a contact in the US Embassy.\n\nBHPernald\nSECRET\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: The Record\nFROM: C/CUB\nSUBJECT: Visit to the Soviet Embassy, Night of 1 October 1969; Occasion: Despedida for Valentin LOGINOV\n\n1. As members of the Cuerpo Consular, Terence D. SISTONE and his wife were formally invited to Valentin LOGINOV's despedida. The scheduled hours on the invitation were from 7:00 to 9:00. Actually, they arrived at about 7:45 and left at about 9:15. SISTONE had two main purposes in attending the reception: 1) to determine LOGINOV's replacement, and 2) to meet the Cubans present, if any. On the first count SISTONE was successful. Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO was formally introduced to the crowd as LOGINOV's replacement by Mr. KAZANTSEV, the Soviet Charg\u00e9. On the second count SISTONE was not successful. The only Cuban present that he recognized from mug photos was Rafael MIRABAL Fernandez, who quite obviously avoided any contact with SISTONE, rather furtively staying on the other side of the room at all times. In all, SISTONE talked to some nine Soviet Embassy officials that he could recognize from the mug book and had somewhat extensive conversation with three, LOGINOV; KAZANTSEV, the Charg\u00e9; and Eduard Anatolyevich SARATOV, TASS representative. For cover\npurposes SISTONE, of course, also had to spend much of his\ntime with fellow members of the Cuerpo Consular, mostly with\nLeander YOURVOULIAS, the Cuerpo Consular president and ex-\nGreek Consul General, and Sra. Marta FONSECA Guardia de\nJIMENEZ, the Consul from Costa Rica and Cuerpo Consular\nsecretary. SISTONE also met a Mexican engineer, Alfonso\nSIBAJA C., who is married to a Greek woman who is Press and\nCultural Attache for Greece. SIBAJA is therefore active in,\nthough not a member of, the Cuerpo Consular. It is very\nearly to tell, of course, but a man like this could conceivably\nbecome an access agent to either Soviet or Cuban officials.\n\n2. At the entranceway SISTONE met and recognized\nCol. Konstantin Nikandrovich BOGATYREV, the Soviet Military\nAttache. Both on this occasion and later in the evening\nBOGATYREV seemed to have a forced grin on his face. He\nexchanged pleasantries but provided nothing of significance.\n\n3. In the reception area inside, SISTONE greeted Valentin\nLOGINOV and his wife, who readily recalled SISTONE and wife\nfrom the excursion to the Ford factory in July. LOGINOV also\nrecalled that SISTONE was Raymond A. FRADYER's replacement\nand asked after the latter: Had he yet arrived in Paris?\nSISTONE said that he understood that FRADYER probably had\narrived by now. SISTONE asked LOGINOV when he was leaving\nfor the Soviet Union. LOGINOV answered that he was leaving\nSECRET\n\n-3-\n\non 7 October and that en route he was visiting New York City, a place that he was anxious to visit. He added that he would not be visiting Paris to see his friend FRADYER. LOGINOV all evening was a very amiable host, circulating and talking to practically everyone present. About half the time he was surrounded by a circle of very young and apparently unattached Mexican ladies - perhaps university students. Mrs. LOGINOV was quite transformed from the very drab woman of the Ford excursion. She was quite dressed up, even attractive, and did her best to be a charming hostess, although this was obviously a forced chore for her. (Later in the evening she busied herself pointing out what she thought to be the choicest items on the buffet table.) Valentin LOGINOV invited SISTONE and his wife to visit him in Russia. SISTONE answered to the effect that this would be wonderful someday if he, or the Russian Government would pick up the tab. LOGINOV replied that that was not necessary because all Americans are so rich they can afford a trip anywhere. Later, talking to SARATOV (see paragraph 9 below), SISTONE was told that LOGINOV would be spending three days in New York City. Later in the evening LOGINOV had his picture taken, probably by a press photographer, with SISTONE's wife, and he was in general quite gallant with her. In the little speech following the buffet, LOGINOV thanked VOURVOULIAS for his few words of farewell and the Cuerpo.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nConsular gift of a silver plate. He ended his speech by saying, \"Thanks on my wife's behalf and mine. You all have been very attentive to my great country.\" About the only times that LOGINOV seemed reflective and serious during the evening were during this little speech and later in saying good-by to SISTONE (accompanying this with an abrazo). LOGINOV's last words to SISTONE were said with much real or imagined feeling: \"You Americans and we Russians have to be real friends in these days of the world.\"\n\n4. Negatively, SISTONE did not see LIREALM-1; SAO's friend, Yuriy VANOVSKY; or Chief, SB's friend, Boris CHMYKHOV, at the Soviet reception. Since there were over 100 people milling about, SISTONE, of course, could have missed those people.\n\n5. Prior to the buffet, SISTONE met again Leon (Spanish version of Lev) N. GOLOUZOV, a member of the Soviet Commercial Staff. SISTONE had met GOLOUZOV on the Ford excursion as well, and the two chatted briefly about that trip. GOLOUZOV gave SISTONE his calling card, which is attached.\n\n6. Standing beside GOLOUZOV, and obviously a very junior officer under the latter's wing, was Vladimir PETROV, also of the Soviet Commercial Office. Following the example of big brother, PETROV also gave SISTONE his calling card, which is attached. PETROV looked to be no more than in his late 20's.\nSECRET\n\n-5-\n\nHe is almost baby faced, has sort of a pug nose, is perhaps 5' 9\" tall, is of medium to slim build, and has light hair. PETROV said he had only been in Mexico two weeks and was terribly confused by the vehicular traffic, which is much noisier and extensive than that of Moscow. Although he speaks Spanish quite well, he said that this is his first tour in Latin America.\n\n7. Also early in the evening SISTONE met Vladislav Sergeyevich KORMUSHKIN, Soviet Vice Consul. He is a fairly tall, heavy built, athletic-looking young man with a very strong handgrip on being introduced. KORMUSHKIN was almost the only Russian with whom SISTONE talked who did not even try to be friendly. He just stood around most of the evening, listening and looking very ill at ease.\n\n8. SISTONE only met Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO, LOGINOV's replacement, very briefly and on an occasion when LOGINOV was not around. Therefore, SISTONE was not formally introduced by title or as FRADYER's replacement to NECHIPORENKO. This man looks very Latin and could mix in a crowd on the street without any difficulty. He stayed very much in the background all evening. During the little ceremony in which he was introduced by the Charg\u00e9 as LOGINOV's replacement, he was asked when he had previously served in Mexico by the latter. He replied he had been in Mexico from 1960 (or 1961) to 1965.\nSECRET\n\n-6-\n\nThe Charg\u00e9 described him as a young man advancing rapidly in the Soviet Foreign Service. He also said he had been a Military Attach\u00e9 before but is now a Second Secretary and is taking over as Consul. The Charg\u00e9 described NECHIPORENKO as a non-Great Russian. SISTONE missed his nationality, if it was mentioned. The Charg\u00e9 hastened to add that NECHIPORENKO's wife, however, is Great Russian.\n\n9. Possibly the longest conversation SISTONE had with any Russian was that with Eduard Anatolyevich SARATOV, the TASS representative. SISTONE was introduced to him by Findley HOWARD, local Pan American representative. SARATOV was the only one with whom SISTONE spoke in English. All other conversation with Russians and other non-Americans was in Spanish. SARATOV is a very smooth, gallant man-about-town. He seemed to really enjoy talking to Americans and other non-Russians at the reception, and bowed and established rapport with the ladies of all ages. He said he has been in Mexico two years, is married, and has one son in the fourth grade, who is naturally attending the Embassy school and who will be sent next year to the Soviet Union for his further education. He asked SISTONE how many children he has and commented on the answer, five, by saying that in his business it is not practical to have many children. SISTONE asked him how he gets his news to send home. SARATOV replied that he is obliged to send home\ndaily a resume of the most important Mexican events, much of which he obtains from the Mexican press. He added, with a smile, that he, of course, has to supplement such newspaper accounts with information from his own contacts. SISTONE asked if this meant, among other things, getting handouts from Government offices. SARATOV dismissed such sources as unimportant. He said this daily resume which he sends home by Telex takes him about two or three hours. He said he is the lone TASS representative here. He has his own office separate from the Embassy and prefers it that way. SARATOV claimed to have traveled around Mexico quite a bit. He seemed to be impressed with the Yucatan and wanted to know if SISTONE has visited there. The latter replied that he has not yet visited the Yucatan since being stationed here, but that, as a tourist, he had seen the ruins there some years ago. SARATOV said that he is from Siberia, and in answer to a SISTONE question said he thinks the Georgians are the warmest and friendliest people of the Soviet Union. SARATOV obviously likes to brag about having been stationed previously in Washington. He also said he would very much like to have been assigned to the new TASS office being opened in San Francisco. According to SARATOV, per an agreement between the United States and the U.S.S.R. the former will have a Consulate in Leningrad and the latter a Consulate in San Francisco. The opening of\nthe TASS office in San Francisco is somehow connected with the establishment of the Consulate. In speaking of LOGINOV's three days in New York, SARATOV said he would recommend three things for him to visit: a good steak house, a good Chinese restaurant, and Rockefeller Center Music Hall.\n\n10. Somewhat after the despedida ceremony, SISTONE noted the Charg\u00e9, Boris Aleksandrovich KAZANTSEV, alone and introduced himself. From a distance KAZANTSEV looks extremely young for his high position; closer up he looks a little older. KAZANTSEV was extremely affable when he learned that SISTONE was a new member of the Cuerpo Consular. He said he is a member of an equivalent organization among the diplomats and in that context knows Mr. Wallace STUART quite well. He said he was extremely privileged a couple of nights previously to be able to shake Astronaut ARMSTRONG's hand and talk to him. He thinks the space program a wonderful adventure for both our countries, and he mentioned the current negotiations between the American Atomic Energy Commission and its Russian equivalent in working out the rules for use of peaceful nuclear energy. While affable, KAZANTSEV does not impart any feeling of sincerity whatsoever. He seems transparently cynical, and reminds one of a second-rate American politician. After the above conversation and when SISTONE was talking to a Mexican airport official, for some reason KAZANTSEV reapproached\nSECRET\n\n-9-\n\nSISTONE and said to him and the Mexican that he hoped there would be a rapprochement soon between the United States and Cuba. SISTONE cannot figure out why KAZANTSEV made that remark at that particular time unless 1) he thought the Mexican airport official was a Cuban, or 2) he had been briefed by LOGINOV not only on the fact that SISTONE is FRADYER's replacement, but that FRADYER had somehow been connected with Cuban operations.\n\n11. SISTONE only met Yurly CHERNYSH, Soviet Vice Consul, very briefly to shake hands near the end of the evening. He was easily recognizable from his very light gray hair.\n\n12. SISTONE was only sure of one Cuban's being present, Rafael MIRABAL. At one time, SISTONE thought he saw a gentleman who looked a little like Ambassador Joaquin HERNANDEZ Armas, but at second glance he did not think so. There was no doubt in SISTONE's mind that MIRABAL was avoiding him. On one occasion, MIRABAL was quite close, within earshot, and may well have heard SISTONE either talking English to a fellow American or his wife, or discussing something American. Thereafter, every time SISTONE tried to work his way toward MIRABAL, the latter would shortly move further away. Twice SISTONE talked to people that vaguely looked like they might be Cubans from the mug book, only to discover in both cases that they were Mexican.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n13. One of the above Mexicans turned out to be Alfonso SIBAJA C., who described himself as a mechanical engineer and industrial consultant. His address is Ezequiel 82, Mexico 14, D.F., and his telephone number is 17-88-85. This man is the husband of a lady he described as Press and Cultural Attache of the Greek Embassy. SISTONE was also introduced to her somewhat later and got the impression that she is not Greek but either all Mexican or perhaps of partial Greek ancestry. SIBAJA and SISTONE exchanged calling cards (SIBAJA's is attached). SIBAJA said that he and his wife attend such functions as this reception quite frequently and definitely recalled not having met SISTONE before. The latter explained his recent arrival. SIBAJA claimed that he is a good singer of folklore songs and that his wife knows how to dance them. They have performed spontaneously quite often at diplomatic and consular affairs. Asked whether he would be going on the Cuerpo Consular excursion scheduled for late October, SIBAJA said he would like to go. He is a working man, however, and was not sure he could get away. SIBAJA and wife and SISTONE and wife established rapport rather easily, and all agreed they should meet again rather shortly. SIBAJA said that he is of partial French ancestry. He looks as though he might be Mideastern, however. He is proud that he is from JUAREZ' home state of Oaxaca. It would seem to SISTONE that this is\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n-11-\n\nthe kind of man who might be used as a fairly nonsuspicious access agent to either the Soviets or the Cubans. He obviously circulates in their social milieu. SISTONE intends to follow up on this man. He said he lives in Colonia Lindavista, where SISTONE's wife's relatives are concentrated. He has a son going to Colegio Tepeyac in that area.\n\n14. The only Americans SISTONE was aware of at the reception were 1) Clyde SNIDER, Chief of the Visa Section of the Consulate, 2) Findley HOWARD, of Pan American, and 3) David WIESLEY, American businessman and Honorary Consul of Iceland.\n\n15. Considering the fact that SISTONE was only in the Soviet Embassy a little over one hour and had to spend a good part of his time talking to SNIDER, VOURVOULIAS, and that real pain-in-the-neck, Sra. JIMENEZ, he considers his contact with Soviets about the maximum that could be achieved under the circumstances.\n\nAttachment:\nCopy of calling cards (3)\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - SIBAJA (new P), w/att\n1 - P-11712 (LOGINOV), w/o att\n\nTDS: Imp\nSUBJECT: LIBACC 1\n\nDATE: 1 Oct., 1970 - 1730, El Farito Rest. & Hotel Emperor.\n\n1. I arrived ten minutes prior to the appointed time, noting Subject's car parked around the corner, entered the restaurant and found Subj without difficulty.\n\n2. Without any preliminaries to speak of, Subj told me that he had interesting news for me. As he hesitated for a moment I asked him if he had been invited to the despedida this evening. He was a bit shocked and probably disappointed, but with a \"no, what\", but recovered quickly and admitted that this was to have been the interesting news - yes he had been invited and was going. He explained that he had made a phone call to the Embassy to invite LQGMCY to his house for a farewell party, but the latter turned the tables and invited Subj to the despedida. Subj claimed that he told LQG that this in reality a \"dirty deal\", but LQG countered with the claim that he was unable to return urgently and nor he was too busy to consider personal invitations. (Subj did not appear to be unhappy with this turn of events.) Subj promised to keep his eyes and ears open and fervently hoped that LQG could introduce him to his replacement, the unofficial one.\n\n3. Above, of course, took only a few minutes, the rest of the time Subj discussed women, food, drink, and related topics. He would like, he said, to be better acquainted with all the people (works at Sovemb) when he considers to be an exceptionally interesting girl, although married. (I don't believe he is a position to do much about this. I believe he is capable of seducing a lot of girls, but I don't see how he could work up much access to this woman.)\n\n4. Subj gave a copy of a short paper (written in Russian) he worked up on his friend EKAS who lives in San Juan del Rio, near Cordoba. Subj is very anxious to have us help this individual but I still don't see much point in it. I asked Subj if EKAS is acquainted with anyone at the Sovemb and was told that he might know one or two the knock Aus/Span six (names?) who are employed there. EKAS is one of these himself. A translation of the document is attached.\n\n5. Subj is a very friendly, likable chap, but I do not think he would find it difficult to fabricate something, whether it be important or otherwise. This is purely an opinion, so far, based on nothing concrete.\n\n6. Subject expressed a desire to have a \"blast\" with me sometime with no reference to business. I said I would consider it, perhaps it would be amusing.\n\nD.F.D.\n\nD.F.D.\n1 October 1969\n\nBelow is translation of document written by LIBACI 1 re His friend\n\nH\u00c9NARES who lives in San Juan del R\u00edo.\n\n\"H\u00c9NARES\n\nA Spaniard born in the province of ASTURIAS. During the Spanish Civil War was taken to the USSR with other children. Completed his elementary schooling in Spanish children's schools. Entered Leningrad University majoring in history, and following graduation was given a chair in the same department. Arrived in Mexico, I believe, in 1957, with the aid of his sister, who lives in San Juan del R\u00edo, is a manager of a restaurant. H\u00e9naire is a very intelligent, sensitive fellow. Always studied with pleasure. His very fond of nature and animals. During periods of vacation from the elementary schools, instead of just fooling around as did the other kids, he would work as a shepherd, water boy, in vineyards, took long walks, read, etc., and always tried to be a loner. Therefore, he was not very well liked, was teased, and once, knowing that he was not a good swimmer, was thrown from a steep bank into the river ALERCA. My mother dropped him out. He always loved her, and to this day has great affection for her. Whenever he visits Mexico he never fails to call on her. Being acquainted with his character and sentiments, I would say that now, living in a big city, he suffers greatly. I suppose that because of his loneliness he ingratiated a stupid, old-fashioned, Indian girl. His political views are the most liberal, and being an intelligent fellow, he was never placed in an uncomfortable position, although he was not fully trusted.\n\nI think, that were it possible to use these characteristics, we could use him to our great advantage.\"\n\nI told subject that we would make no move whatsoever until, and perhaps not even then, he provided me with personal biographic data re the above individual.\n\nD.F.D.\n\nD. F. D\u00cdAZ-ES\u00d3N\n\u041d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u044b\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0435, \u0432 1937 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0443 \u0432 \u0411\u0435\u0440\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043b\u0430\u0441\u044c \u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0447\u0430 \u0441 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0449\u0435\u043c \u043f\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0435. \u041c\u044b \u043e\u0431\u0441\u0443\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u0438 \u0438 \u0442\u0435\u0445\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438. \u0412\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0445\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0443\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0438 \u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e. \u0412 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u044b, \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434 \u043d\u043e\u0432\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0430\u043c\u0438. \u041d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0435, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0430\u044f \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u0443 \u0438 \u0442\u0435\u0445\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0443. \u0412\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0445\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0443\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0438 \u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e. \u0412\u0430\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0445\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0443\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0438 \u0438 \u0441\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e.\n...\nACTION: Secstate WASBDC\n\nMEXICO 5364\n\nFOR FBI\n\nVISAS HORSE Valentin LOGUNOV C-3 December 23, 1927\nMoscow, employee of Soviet Embassy in Mexico. Arr.\nNew York October 7, 1969 via Air France Flt. 700.\nDep. New York October 10 via Aeroflot. Accompanied\nby wife, Alexandra LOGUNOVA August 20, 1928 Moscow,\nand son, Dimitri LOGUNOV born 1959.\n\nMCMURDO\n\nDrafted by C/VIS:CWSnider/ml\n10/1/69\n\nAttaching Officer C/VIS:CWSnider\n\nR11712\nMexico\n\nTo September 27, 1969\n\n1. Talking to various people, such as Guillermo Tardiff, no information has been circulated or has circulated regarding the fact that Carrillo Flores did not attend the interview of Raul Roa, foreign minister of Cuba and president D\u00edaz Ordaz.\n\n2. By going to the General Assembly of the United Nations, lic. Carrillo Flores, secretary of Foreign Relations is out of the presidential race by constitutional reasons.\n\nAccording to people who may be considered as knowing about politics Carrillo Flores never had a chance to be nominated because of his close associations with United States bankers.\n\n2. On the 18 of September I went to the national day celebration at the Chilean embassy, where I met Kazantsev who invited me to go to their embassy on the first of October for a farewell party for Valentin Lomguinov, who is leaving soon. The new Czechoslovakian ambassador was with Kazantsev. I arrived late and many people had already left. Wallace Stuart was there, the new Rau ambassador, the Ghana ambassador, the Paraguayan charg\u00e9 d'affaires, an several other diplomats of minor importance. The Chilean colony seems to be quite large.\n\n[Signature]\n\nLogunov\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nSUBJECT: LIBACON 1\n\nDATE, TIME & PLACE: 25 Sept. 69, 2030 - 2200 hrs., Florence Rest.\n\n1. Subj arrived eight minutes late and realising same, apologised. He appeared to be in a good mood and when asked told me that he and his wife were now getting along very well. He claimed that he called LOGNOV at the Embassy on the morning of the 15th and asked that their dinner engagement for that evening be postoned. According to Subject LOG told him that their dinner had been scheduled for the 15th, not the 16th, so Subj assumed assumed LOG was correct. I reminded Subj that to the best of my recollection it had been for the 15th. In any event, Subj said LOG took the postponement very well, especially when Subj confirmed with LOG again that the latter was not leaving in October, perhaps not even in November. Subj apologized to LOG, explaining that his wife had just taken on a new job, was nervous about it, and in addition, was taking care of her parents dog and birds, and was simply not in condition to have a party. (I am not sure Subj went through with this explanation to LOG or to me only.) Subj plans to visit LOG at the Embassy on the 29th, 30th, or the first of October, at which time he will set a date for the dinner, hopefully he said, for the same week. If the dinner is to be held prior to Libac on the evening of the first of Oct. Subj will call the office, (as in the past) and so inform the party on the other end. Our next meeting is scheduled for 1600 hours, 1 Oct., at the \"El Hortino\" (?) Rest. annex in the Suites Emporador.\n\n2. Subject's wife, described as a \"bilingual\" secretary/typist is now employed by \"Orbita S. Lamenta\", and is paid 3,500 monthly. Subj, claims that she will be earning 3,000 by next month, if everything goes well. One of the partners at this (?) of this establishment is Andrei Gavino Michelena.\n\n3. Subj then asked me if I/check a street map of Moscow and see if I could find VL. NEZHNOVA on it. I told him I could but would not give him an answer one/or the other unless he would provide me with a satisfactory reason. After extracting a promise from me that I would not laugh at him, he proceeded to tell me about a recent experience he had with a medium at Andre's home. He prefaced his story with an assurance that he is an atheist and does not believe in the hereafter nor in spiritualism; in particular, nevertheless, he was shaken with the experience. He claimed that the medium (name unknown to Subj.) did not go into a trance, nor turn off any of the lights, but simply used Subj. if he had ever known a girl by the name of Tanya while Subj. lived in a small town near Ivanova (not far from Moscow.) Subj. claimed that he recalled a girl by that name, that he met her were only about 10 yrs. of age at the time, and that they used to go mushroom gathering together. He said he broke out in a cold sweat when he medium asked this question because he was absolutely positive that no one in Mexico would remember the girl's name nor the episode. The medium then said, speaking for Tanya, \"Korov o Kafichka\" (hello, Rafael). Subj. claims that the medium has no knowledge of the Russian language and that he had not been called \"Kafichka\" since early childhood. Subj. The medium explained that Tanya had died six months ago and was not present in the room. Through the medium, Tanya explained (in Spanish) that she had been married to a Valentin Blas 7, now living at 1111, Boshiana,\na.t. 23, Moscow. Subj was not sure he had the correct numerical address, nor did he know what region of Moscow the street was in. Tanya further explained that KIRASOV was engaged in some unspecified underground work, possibly anti-government activity, and that one member of this group was actually employed by the KGB. He was not further identified.\n\nb. Subj then went on to relate two other \"odd\" experiences he had had prior to his coming to Mexico. They are not worth repeating here. I told Subj I would try to locate the afore mentioned street on the Moscow map but that I did not take any of this very seriously. Although Subj realized that I was amused by this tale he was not angered by my attitude, saying he did not know what to make of it himself.\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\nDATE: 23-IX-69\n\n1. Salesman\n   [Signature]\n\n2. Supervisor\n   John Francis\n\n3. Date/meeting\n   27-IX-69, 2000-0300 hours\n   Site: Home of Dr. Luis Gomez, Irloclas 221\n\n4. Date/next mtg.\n   Site\n\n5. Administrative\n   Nothing.\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n   Nothing.\n\n7. Report by salesman\n   1. Party. The occasion was a farewell party given by our\n      tennis group in the home of Dr. Gomez for DIXAND, who leaves\n      October 7th or 8th for Moscow. In addition to myself and my\n      wife, the following were present:\n\n      Gloria Pinto\n      Pepa Pinto\n      Luis Gomez\n      Sylvia Gomez\n      Mercedes Pinto (elderly writer, aunt of Pepa, mother of\n      Ruben, mother of Pitucha who is the wife of Herb\n      Wallace)\n      Ruben Rojas, actor in TV soap operas (novelas)\n      and the legitimate theater.\n\n   8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n   Please instruct me as to whether or not you want me to\n   attend the reception Wednesday, and if so, what to look for\n   besides meeting DIXAND's replacements. Can you call off the\n   FAY?\n\n   [Signature]\n\n   P. 11, 7/2\nThe party was very gay, excellent food brought by each of the guests, much music, dancing, and drinking. No politics. Everyone was in a very friendly mood.\n\n2. Formal farewell reception. Wednesday, October 1, at 1900 hours at the Soviet embassy will be the formal party for DEMAND.\n\nThe Platos, Cozas and possibly others from our group will attend this party. I do not know how big it will be.\n\nDEMAND was disappointed when I said I would not attend, but that this was no reflection on my friendship for him. I stated that I felt it unwise for an American to visit the Soviet embassy. I was afraid that the FBI or CIA would learn of my visit. Val was very insistent and said he'd be disappointed if we did not come. Later in the evening he brought up the subject again and insisted there would be no way anyone could know if I were present or not\u2014there would be no risk to me\u2014no names would be recorded. I said I would think about it, but doubted that we would come.\n\n3. DEMAND's replacement. During the course of the evening speeches were made, or at least semi-formal comments and wishes of good luck to DEMAND and his wife. DEMAND said that his replacement would be at the farewell party at the embassy and he hoped we would all meet him. Ralph Wiegandt stated that he wanted DEMAND's replacement to know that he, the replacement, would be welcome in our group. Our group is somewhat international and has given us all a chance to exchange views. We would report losing contact with the Soviets. DEMAND then mentioned that his replacement is something of a sportman.\n\n4. Yuri Schornich. I told DEMAND that I hadn't seen Yuri for a long time. I asked what had happened to him. He answered that Yuri had been on vacation for a while. This does not account for the many months, perhaps five or six, that I have not seen Yuri. I did not press the issue.\n\n5. DEMAND first. DEMAND seemed to be indifferent to Popo's presence. When he danced with Gloria he often seemed very intimate\u2014dancing close, whispering and giggling, soulful looks. Gloria did not try to control this situation, but rather participated. My wife later reported that while dancing with DEMAND he also tried to flirt with her, but on a more discreet level, holding her too close, squeezing her hand meaningfully, etc.\n\n6. Dr. Coza's comments. We arrived promptly at 2000 hours. We were the first guests to arrive and the only guests for nearly an hour. During this time Dr. Coza made several comments of interest. First, let me say that I have thought that Luis\nwas a communist sympathizer, despite his wealth. He became famous\nsome time back by successfully saving back on a hand that was\namputated in an accident. He is a doctor with Seguro Social.\nMexico since has shown his stuff to the world as Mexico's great\nhand surgeon. He travels around the world attending medical\nconventions and is the principal host to medical conventions\nhere in Mexico. An elaborate book was published by Seguro\nSocial on surgery of the hand and Luis' work in that field.\nI mention the above since it seems to set the stage for someone\nwho might believe that socialism and socialized medicine is\ngood, because he himself has profited so greatly from it.\n\nFurther, Luis and Sylvia had made it known for quite some\ntime that they wanted to have the farewell party for DEHARD\nin their home. I always felt that this was due to communist\nsympathy. Now I don't know. And I am at a loss to explain why\nthey insisted upon holding the party. They do not seem to be\nclose friends of DEHARD, are somewhat different in social\nand intellectual status, and no longer seem to me to be com-\nmunist sympathizers.\n\nLuis commented that DEHARD's son would probably come\nto the party since they have no maid. Incidentally, he did not\ncome. He then stated that the boy still speaks no Spanish at all.\nHe added that the boy has lived in Mexico for five years and\nbefore that for several years in Cuba. Luis explained that\nthe Soviets are afraid to have their children see how the world\nreally is. Luis added that Khrushchev saw a super-market in\nLos Angeles and simply couldn't believe his eyes. Luis was\nfrankly critical of the Soviets and their intellectual isolation-\nism.\n\n7. DEHARD MIGHT RETURN. DEHARD and his wife both con-\nceded that there was a good chance they might come right back\nto Mexico. She told me that if she did, she would like to teach\nin Russian. We had exchanged a few elementary words during the\nevening.\n\nShe began: \"I'm not sure if I can speak Russian. I'm sure if\nhe would have offered to have heard\nsomething which made him say what\nhe did.\"\nMEMORANDUM\n\nM\u00e9xico, D.F., Septiembre 26 de 1969.\n\nCon relaci\u00f3n al asunto del italiano, que hemos tratado, me permito indicarte que la amistad se inici\u00f3 por la necesidad de traducir unos documentos oficiales que nos solicitaba la Secretar\u00eda de Gobernaci\u00f3n, por medio de los cuales deb\u00edamos demostrar el nombre correcto de un cliente.\n\nDicha amistad se ha conservado bajo un nivel normal y m\u00e1s o menos se inici\u00f3 hace aproximadamente un a\u00f1o, sin que se hayan tenido otras citas como no es para tomar algunos tragos o almuerzo.\n\nSin embargo, el d\u00eda de ayer mismo se hizo una cita la cual se llevar\u00e1 a efecto el d\u00eda de ma\u00f1ana y ya se permitir\u00e1 informar te m\u00e1s sobre el particular.\n\n[Signature]\n\nThis is LIBASSO-1. Note on LIBASSO, whom we expect to meet at a restaurant on 27 Sep. Purpose is for LIBASSO-1 to establish and maintain social relations with LIBASSO-1 for assessment and possible development for a position by someone else. Our choice is to see future notes.\n\n[Signature]\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief SB\n\nINFO: Chief, CUBA\n\nSUBJECT: Relationship Between ADEIEHARD and Gloria PINTO\n\n26 September 1969\n\n1. In response to a conversation between Chief, SB, and the undersigned, LIREALM-1 was questioned in detail on 25 September concerning the relationship which exists between ADEIEHARD and Gloria PINTO with a view toward possible embarrassment of ADEIEHARD before his superiors.\n\n2. LIREALM-1 and his wife both believe (but have no proof) that it is probable that Gloria PINTO is having or has had an affair with ADEIEHARD. Both LIREALM and his wife are close friends of the PINTO's and know that Gloria is strongly attracted to ADEIEHARD who is both physically and intellectually superior to her husband. Due to Gloria's continued friendship with ADEIEHARD at the French Club and other places, LIREALM-1 feels sure that Gloria's husband, Pepe, does not yet know of the affair.\n\n3. LIREALM-1 characterized Pepe PINTO as: sweet, slow-witted and below average in Intelligence. He is a physician specializing in lung disorders, born in the Canary Islands. He considers himself a Spaniard with the characteristic Spanish lack of respect for women. He attempts to tightly control Gloria's activities while, according to Gloria, having as many affairs himself as he can. Gloria greatly resents Pepe's attitude toward her. Pepe is basically defensive and would not want anyone to know if Gloria were having an affair with another man. He would probably deny it if anyone said so, even if he were aware of it. He would take it out on Gloria, however, and would probably beat her and restrict her movements even more closely.\n\n4. In view of the above, it would certainly appear that there would be nothing to gain, and perhaps much to lose, by any attempt at exposing her supposed affair with ADEIEHARD. Since she now appears to be in contact with SHEVCHENKO, much better to hope for better developments in this case.\n\nAndrew E. FELLENGEN\n\nSECRET\n1. Agent/Subject: LICOZY-5\n2. Case Officer Vincent P. RIZZUTO\n3. Date and site of contact: 25 September - Cafeteria Parque\n\nParagraph 5 (continued)\n\nIt off than attempt to collect the money. There are sufficient funds in the project.\n\nParagraph 7 (continued)\n\nis more to this invitation than meets the eye and that the KGB will be going all out to recruit him. I think Subject may be right and I think he should probably find a good excuse for not going.\n\nSubject states that he had complained to KAZANTSEV (P-880) about the shoddy treatment he had been getting from LOGINOV (P-11,712). Never before had he been forced to \"stand in line\" for Soviet visas for his clients. In the past, he had been able to send passports to the Soviet Embassy any day\u2014never mind the office hours\u2014and get the passports back with visa the same day. Subject says that LOGINOV himself finally admitted that this was because Subject had been uncooperative (meaning that he had refused to let LOGINOV recruit him). Subject says unequivocally that LOGINOV is leaving PCS by the end of October and that he is not being replaced by a newcomer. Subject understands that NECHIPORENKO, who in a former tour had worked in the Consular Section, will take over as Chief of the Consular Section when LOGINOV leaves.\n\nSubject says that KAZANTSEV is about to leave (in fact, Subject thought KAZANTSEV had already left) and that both a replacement for him and a new ambassador were on the way. I told Subject that as far as I know, KAZANTSEV was to be replaced by another consular who would be Charg\u00e9, but Subject insisted that an ambassador had been named and would be coming soon. He did not know who the ambassador would be.\n\nSubject remarked that both IVANOV and NIKITOV had left and he said that NIKITOV was, he thought, a very decent person.\n\nSubject said that PRIKHODKO (P-2270) had come to see him to say goodbye. PRIKHODKO had said, almost with tears in his eyes, that Subject had been a very good friend and that he would never forget him. He invited Subject and wife to come visit him in Moscow. Then when Subject asked PRIKHODKO for his address, PRIKHODKO hemmed and hawed and said that he didn't really have an address yet but that Subject could write him in care of Latin American Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Subject remarked that PRIKHODKO was undoubtedly being sincere, but when you came right down to it, he was just as hemmed in and afraid as anything of the others. Subject said that it was a real tragedy that the Soviet system made such robots out of good people.\nMisiones Diplom\u00e1ticas\n\nEL EMBAJADOR de China, Chih-Ping Chen, asiste como miembro de la delegaci\u00f3n de su pa\u00eds a la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. Regresar\u00e1 a mediados de diciembre. En M\u00e9xico est\u00e1 como encargado de negocios el ministro consular Chih-Hsiang Tang, el embajador de Argentina, Enrique Mart\u00ednez Paz, y una vez en honor del secretario de Comunicaciones y Transportes, Antonio Padilla Segura, a la que asistieron varias antiguas del antifranco y del nacionalismo. Keith William Baker, secretario de la embajada de Australia y su esposa Mar\u00eda Magdalena Ramirez, regresar\u00e1n de su luna de miel en Acapulco en la pr\u00f3xima... Wolfgang Reimer, representante del Ministerio de Comunicaciones, est\u00e1 en M\u00e9xico en pl\u00e1ticas con funcionarios del gobierno y dirigentes de los hombres de negocios. Varios diplom\u00e1ticos de la embajada de B\u00e9lgica le dieron la bienvenida en el aeropuerto... Regres\u00f3 y asumi\u00f3 sus funciones el decano del cuerpo diplom\u00e1tico, embajador de los Pa\u00edses Bajos, bar\u00f3n Schelto van Heemstra. Estuvo varias veces de vacaciones en su patria... La Comisi\u00f3n Cultural del Cuerpo Consular en M\u00e9xico, organizadora de la conmemoraci\u00f3n de los d\u00edas 27, 28 y 29 de octubre, prepar\u00f3 un programa que mantendr\u00e1 a los delegados muy ocupados y contentos durante esos tres d\u00edas. Visitaron las grandes empresas como la Fundidora, Higuerita y L\u00e1mina, la Cervecer\u00eda...\nMemorandum\n\nTO: RIZZUTO through ARCHBOLD\nFrom: FERNALD\n\nSubject: AEDIKHARD (P-11,712) & Thoughts on possibility of Pitching Him\n\n1. Assuming it was agreed that A should be pitched before his PCS departure, because there are no indications that he would be more susceptible to an approach later when he comes to a new post abroad in a few years and, to the contrary, it is more likely that he would be still more daring, more self-confident and more determined to advance and solidify his position within the KGB, I wish to add some views of mine to the list of possibilities as to how a pitch could be carried out.\n\n2. My views and thoughts on this subject will be based on the possible use of existing assets and means. I am fully aware that there will be plenty of room for improvements, additions and modifications of what will be said in the following paras.\n\n3. As far as I know we are lacking adequately solid facts in which we could put our teeth, i.e. we do not possess worthwhile mentioning material which we could use to exert a desired pressure on A.\n\n4. I am inclined to believe that we are in a position to make a serious attempt to obtain a \"pressure argument\" through the use of existing assets which are targeted against A and that it can be done without taking an undue risk.\n\n5. As a move in this direction I was thinking in terms of having recorded a SABORI-A meet for which we would prepare SABORI. To be more specific I have in mind a situation along the following lines:\n\n   a. In going to one of his next meets with A, SABORI should carry on his person a transmitter. I am not in favor of a body recorder, because the recording time is limited and it requires the bearer to be turning it on and off, while the transmitter can be set and it requires no action by the bearer on one hand and on the other the bearer is under the impression that\nevery action and statement of his is recorded from the moment the transmitter is strapped on him.\n\nb. SABORI should go to such a meet with expression of a person who is in exceptionally good mood, because of a business success and he was given a substantial advance on his commission. After A and SABORI have their routine two drinks, SABORI will state to A that he would pick up the tab for the evening (after being treated by A so many times) but he would want to celebrate the occasion. It would be desirable that A agrees on a drink or two to please S, but even if that does not take place, it is anticipated that A would want to accompany S in his good humor. What ever be the case, the situation lends itself to a free talking, critical commenting and some bitching, just to play it big. It will be up to us to prepare S as to how to run the conversation to get out of A a few statements which he would not like his superiors to know about.\n\nc. As far as S is concerned I believe that he can be persuaded to carry a transmitter on his person and as a reason for requesting it we could tell him that it represented a complimentary element to the PAQ which he made on A, because the psychologist who reviewed his PAQ considered it essential to have a tape covering one meet. There is no way of hiding the fact that we will be recording what is transmitted, but we will not have to give any explanations regarding how it will be done.\n\nd. I hope that one way or the other we will be in possession of a tape which could be used as a pressure factor. From there on all becomes a matter of manipulation: S may request a meet with A under the pretext that that the people interested in the platinum deal sent to C their specialist, who would like to clear some\nquestions before opening the Letter of Credit and that it was essential that the person who arrived here be A, because that will strengthen S' position in the deal. I mentioned the platinum deal because it would give some common ground to the new person being introduced on the scene, but some other story might be as good.\n\n6. The new person showing up under the platinum deal or any other pretext would be a case officer of ours. I feel that such a person should at first sight show that he was a Yankee, that he be versed in platinum or what ever the pretext may be and that he should be a Russian language speaker. I am inclined to believe that after some business talk and after creating an atmosphere of mutual understanding there would be no problem for the case officer to start speaking Russian. If A takes this fact in good mood and the business conversation continues in Russian, S would be in a position to excuse himself as a person who was no longer needed. It is almost impossible to anticipate what would be A's reaction to the fact that S wanted to leave. If insisted that S stay, we will have to accept it. Nevertheless, S will be instructed to \"go to the bathroom\" for a while and the case officer will have to use this opportunity to drop his cover and go on with his job. He will have in his pocket a reel of tape to counteract A's emphatic refusal (which we must anticipate).\n\nf. It may be mentioned that S will not have to know anything about the existence of the tape and as far as the case officer is concerned S may have to be satisfied with the explanation that the c.o. was the psychologist who decided that he wanted to meet A in person. Of course, A may not bear out this cover, but that will be at the stage of developments when we could not care less.\n\nc. There is no doubt that S will be burned whether the\nthe things turn out right or wrong, but S will be left only with guesses as to what transpired between the case officer and A in Russian.\n\nh. It is the fate of any officer making the pitch to be burned if the exercise ends in anything less than a success. Therefore, it would be worthwhile considering to get a suitable language speaker case officer from Eqs for this purpose.\n\n6. I am aware of the fact that the above discussed scheme has a quite certain weakness in as much as it is built on and around an untested asset as S is. Nevertheless, in terms of security and protection of Agency/Station assets the scheme is advantageous, which is self-evident.\n\n7. It should be assumed that S might come up with some objections when it comes to introducing another person to A from fear that he would deal himself out of the game and terminate his usefulness to us. I do not consider it difficult to put him at ease.\n\n8. For your consideration and comments.\n\nEHFernald\n\nThis is not a bad plan, but I think it needs some\n\nThe following points come to mind:\n\n1) I think S should not be used as an unknown quantity to build any type of rapport and\n\n2) I question the efficacy of what is suggested to be essential, a technical approach. Why not be worry about what's on the tape (he can say he was just saying it for the record) and his reaction which will likely be favorable.\n\n3) I doubt we can get a technically adequate tape\n\n4) The letters now may help to clear some points\n\nNevertheless, was brought out with the problem of hand: had to make a\nAgree that blackmail won't work - but in reading file, one thing that stands out (to me at least) is the energy with which ABELEHARD pursues his career. Believe he is ruthlessly ambitious to get ahead. If we are willing to burn SADORI, it might be advantageous to insert senior Russian speaking staffer as suggested in this paper (but without transmitter) who will make A offer to think over on long cold Moscow nights prior to his arrival at a new post. Our offer will consist of first, sowing seeds of discontent on fact that he is now 42 years old and has not risen to the heights in his profession that he could have. (He is only listed as 3rd Secretary while younger men are 1st and 2nd Secretaries.) I don't know his KGB rank but it can be intimated that we know his rank could be higher. Talking fast, we could then suggest to A that we will work out a plan in his absence whereby we can aid his future career by putting him in his path advantageous situations such as allowing him to \"recruit\" a U.S. official at his next post. In return, he would service our requirements during his tour. Our working relationship with A could have a time limit with control factors on both sides. \"No answer is wanted now. Report the approach if you wish. The offer will be good upon your arrival at the new post wherever it is.\" (A, of course, will think the talk is recorded so there must be some way of assuring him it is not. SADORI, naturally, must be absent.)\n\nNot a bad idea, but the intermediating should be someone else. I would not SADORI. I don't want burning SADORI, but I think burning ABELEHARD's case in him would produce every desired effect. Anyway, unless ABELEHARD does anything wrong, I think not likely, unless they are careless.\n\nVFR\n1. Salesman/Contact: John Francis - LREACM-1\n2. Supervisor: John P. Sanderson - CVP/P\n3. Meeting date/time: \n   location: \n4. Next mtg date/time: \n   location: \n5. Administration: \n6. Instructions issued: \n7. Report from salesman:\n   Gloria Pino called JF's wife A to inform her that the funeral service for ADELEHARD will be Saturday 23rd at home of Mr. Gomez. He leaves 8-24-69.\n8. Competition activity: \n9. Sanderson comments: \n\nNote copy for CLEB use.\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman\n   Oleg Chevchenko\n\n2. Supervisor\n   John Francis\n\n3. Date/meeting\n   13-IX-69, 1000-1100 hours\n   Site\n   French Club\n\n4. Date/next mtg.\n   None planned\n   Site\n\n5. Administrative\n   Not applicable\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n   Not applicable\n\n7. Report by salesman\n   Has been playing tennis for two years. However, has always been active in sports, especially basketball and volleyball.\n\n   Hovde. Asked is I new Bill Hovey (could have been Hovde). Said this was a businessman, an American but with military rank. The Directory shows\n\n   Col. William J. Hovde (Am.); wife, Norma G. (Am.). Destilby S.A., Miguel Cervantes Saavedra 25, z.17. Tel. 45-65-60. Res. Rio Escondido 20, Lomas-Hip., z.10. Tel. 20-71-38. Clubs: ChapGolf, WhFr, NavyL.\n\n   Note: Win's address is Rio Esc. 16.\n\n8. Competition\n   See item #9.\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n   1. It is possible that Oleg had been planning to contact me and had deliberately had placed himself in my path.\n   2. It is also possible that Oleg, like all the other Soviets, hates to spend money and would rather play with another club member than to spend money on an instructor. He may be trying to build up a group of friends or acquaintances with whom he can play.\n\nP-11, 7/12\n9. Supervisor's comments (continued)\n\n3. If he had been looking for me, it could be that he has been asked to step in where Val failed. That is, as an American friend, I never invited Val to my home. He never met other Americans through me. Note, however, that he never invited me to his home either\u2014though he did invite us frequently to various events which were under the auspices of the Soviet embassy. We did not but rarely accept. One such occasion was the Moscow circus.\n\n4. If he had been looking for me, it could be that he wants to assure his acceptance by our tennis group where Gloria Pinto is a possible target. Oleg has gotten to Gloria, but I, the American who is somewhat and sometimes hostile to Soviets, might be considered a stumbling block. Perhaps he, Oleg, will try to reach all the other members of the group individually so that an invitation by Gloria to one of our functions will meet with general acceptance.\n\nSCENARIO OF CONTACT\n\nI arrived about 0900 and took an instructor.\n\nAbout 0950 Oleg arrived to play with and instructor on the adjoining court. He made no effort to greet me. He had been pointed out to me by Val, but I had not been pointed out to him do my knowledge\u2014though it is certain that Oleg and Val must have discussed the \"players\" in their \"game\" and counted me as possibly on the other team. That is, I am sure that Val has pointed me out to Oleg, but Oleg would not have wanted to acknowledge this.\n\nAt 1000 my hour was up and I told my instructor I was through\u2014I did not want to continue for another hour. As I was paying my instructor I noticed that Oleg was paying his. It is very unusual and possibly even bad form to take an instructor for less than half-an-hour. I am suggesting that he wanted to be free to contrive an accidental meeting with me.\n\nI set a course for one of the several gates from the courts we were using. I could see that Oleg had headed for the same gate (this could have been perfectly natural) and at a speed which after some thirty yards would bring him to the gate at the same moment as I (this was not entirely natural).\n\nSince I had an excuse to greet him, having had him pointed out in front of Pepe Pinto the preceding week, I did so. I asked said Good Morning and asked if Val were here. He looked very pleased (I thought possibly relieved) when I took the initiative and recognized him.\nOleg said that Val had not arrived as far as he knew. I said I had been training to get ready for Val. I wanted my revenge for last week.\n\nOleg seemed amused by this and immediately asked if I would like to play with him since Val was not here. I agreed. We found a court and played for about one hour. Oleg won 6-3, 6-4.\n\nOleg is very athletic in appearance and played and excellent game for someone who has played for only two years (if this is true). He has enormous muscular thighs. It escapes me what sport would produce this, other than weightlifting. Weightlifting is out since his upper torso, though muscular, is far less developed than his legs. Basketball does not seem likely to produce his particular kind of development.\n\nOleg is pleasant. Speaks excellent Spanish. Has not made any political comments (yet!). Seems more intelligent, but less extroverted than Val.\n\nOleg asked if I were with the American Embassy. I answered \"no, I have my own business\". It was then that he asked if I knew another \"Bill\" who is in private business and who has an army rank. Oleg thought the other person was a major.\n\nI left at this point. Oleg stayed on to play some more. My wife could not see him and it is not therefore, known with whom or how much longer Oleg did play. Val was not seen during the course of the morning. The Pintos are in San Francisco.\nSeptember 11, 1969\n\nContact Report\n\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13,830)\nDate of Meet: Sept 10 at Sanborns-Lafragua at 1700 hrs\n\n1. Prearranged meet and S came 10 min early.\n   NEXT MEET: Friday Sept 12 at Chez Rene at 2000 hrs.\n\n2. Instead of receiving the Agency Contract from the Moon Valley Corp.\n   Dallas, Texas, he received a phone call (his phone was connected) on\n   Sept 10 in the morning and was requested to sign the contract immediately\n   and return it by registered mail. The caller (Lester MacGhee) told S that\n   the contract was mailed \"Registered-Return Receipt\" on Mon Sept 9th. S con-\n   cluded that he expected receiving it on Sept 11, but more likely on Sept. 12.\n\n3. S was disappointed because he counted on showing the contract to\n   AEDIEHARD that evening and the absence of the contract will necessitate\n   another meet with A when the contract arrives. FERNALD repeated to S that\n   he needed a Xerox copy of the same and decided to meet with S on Sept 12\n   to debrief him on his meet with A and get a copy of the contract.\n\n4. S will not have much to report to A when he meets him that evening.\n   S went to the Hotel Geneve where a friend of his used to be a manager and\n   was disenchanted when he found out that he no longer worked there. The new\n   manager did not want to show him the register of guests and his attempt\n   to spot a girl or girls who lived in the hotel and appeared to be working\n   bore no results, because all he was able to see or exchange few words were\n   tourists. S spoke to TANG by phone to inform him that the Luan manager\n   wanted to check with the embassy on the size of the ad he was to place\n   in the monthly MISSION. TANG stated that he would take care of that and\n   he reminded S that TANG wanted to see the article before it was printed.\n   Other, than to capitalize on the info that Echevarria would be the next\n   President of Mexico and speak about the platinum deal S had practically\n   nothing to report.\n\n5. F repeated the instruction he gave S on Sept 8 with regard to\n   stalling IS activities with A and as far as the platinum deal was concerned\n   it was made clear that his fair and square will determine our attitude.\n\nBiff Fernald\n1. I am writing on the 20th, 1930, and I am already there. First thing I said was that he could not stay, but I was having trouble with his life, but the only thing due to his past behavior, a previous incident, and I had stayed out all night. But I told him that I would not identify and I did not just do it. I do not feel at this time, that this is a particularly important thing.\n\n2. The thing I noted for my position in the future, was:\n\n(a) The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n(b) The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n3. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n4. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n5. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n6. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n7. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n8. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n9. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n10. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n11. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n12. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n13. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n14. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n15. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n16. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n17. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n18. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n19. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n20. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n21. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n22. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n23. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n24. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n25. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n26. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n27. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n28. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n29. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n30. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n31. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n32. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n33. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n34. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n35. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n36. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n37. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n38. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n39. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n40. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n41. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n42. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n43. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n44. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n45. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n46. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n47. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n48. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n49. The position of the President (according to subject)\n\n50. The position of the President (according to subject)\nContact Report\n\nSubject: Jimmy SABORI (P-13,830)\nDate of Meet: Sept 8 at Cez Rene at 1400 Hrs\n\n1. The meet was prearranged and S came on time. The meet lasted about 3 hours.\n   NEXT MEET: Sept 10 at 1700 hrs at SAMBORNS-La fragua if S does not request to see me earlier.\n\n2. S was advised by phone from Dallas, Texas, that the Moon Valley Corporation was able to meet the Sov requirements concerning the platinum deal and that they mailed on Sat Sept 6 a contract (agency contract) to S which enables him to purchase 10 ounces of platinum per month from the Sov seller (an export company). According to the same phone message the contract provides for a US$3,00 commission per ounce.\n\n3. S hopes to receive the contract before he meets with AEDIE:AND on Sept 10 at 2000 hrs. On his own initiative S decided that he would want to show the contract to FERNALD before taking it to A. That was the reason for arranging another meet with F before the scheduled meet with A.\n\n4. The generous commission provided for by the contract enables S to offer to A US$1,00 per ounce. Even if the minimum required by Sovs is purchased a 21.5% commission per oz. would still net $20,000., according to S's estimates. S anticipates that the purchases would go above the required minimum. S was taking in consideration the possibility that A would not want to accept any commission. Therefore, S came up with a scheme by which there would be a bank account for A and the money would be his, whether he wanted it or not, or better said, it would be up to him to decide when he wanted to use it.\n\n5. At this point it may be mentioned that apart from the fact whether the Sovs would want to close the platinum deal the entire above mentioned account is strictly S's interpretation of what he was told over the phone.\nand only the copy of the Moon Valley Agency Contract with S will clarify many questions one would like to ask right now. Nevertheless, it appears to be probable that an Agency Contract was promised to S.\n\n6. In spite of the fact that at the time of this writing one can deal only with \"ifs\", it is worthwhile mentioning that S believes that A would like to facilitate S to get the deal, because in that case S would be on one hand morally obliged to him and on the other S would have collected a nice sum of money. In turn this would make A feel that he obtained a satisfactory control factor over S and the rest is quite obvious. Other than recurring methods which are quite rarely used against people as S, we are in a situation of a very uncomfortable spectator left with a hope or a which that A might go for the commission.\n\n7. As far as S's willingness to give to A the attractive chunk of money is concerned he is doing it for a double purpose: to please us (indirect protection of his interest) and to protect his interest directly by assuring A's willingness to help him in getting the deal.\n\n8. Although, our situation is not pleasant (if the deal is to materialize) we are not helpless onlookers. S mentioned that if it comes to closing of the deal he will have to travel to Zurich, Switzerland, and for that he needs a passport. How much S is aware of our control position (by enabling him to get a passport fast or dragging its granting) can be best illustrated by the fact that he told P that he would certainly put aside a worthwhile sum for P. Needless to mention that P gave him a damn good lecture when he made his silly statement. Nilly-willy P was obliged to turn weakness into strength and S understood that he could as well forget about the deal (if it comes his way) if he would not play it fair and square with us.\n\n9. S brought up quite reasonably the question that A would most likely put pressure on him to get producing along the lines of assignments against the US Embassy and as the first thing the question of obtaining the Embassy phone directory would be thrown in S's lap.\n\n10. P told S that because of the new development in the platinum business P will allow S to follow A's instruction in as to how to go about getting the directory. P told him to go ahead and look up all the USIB\ngirls he can find in the Hotel Geneve and report to A his findings. P pointed out that we demand from him to stall as much as possible. On S remark that he should have something to report to A when he sees him on Sept. 10 P commented that he will have no objection that S report his findings.\n\n11. S really stalled all he was able in connection with the Chinese Embassy; he did not go there at all, because he still did not obtain the ad from the restaurant Lusau.\n\n12. After the above conv S completed the PAQ, which is attached hereto.\n\n13. S told P that his home phone was disconnected because he did not have money to pay the bill of MN 632. This happened at inconvenient time because the Moon Valley from Dallas, Texas, was not able to reach him and they were obliged to contact him through a friend of his. P anticipated that S would in one or the other way be asking for money and he had with him a filled receipt for MN 500. which he gave him. P implied that he would give him a couple hundred pesos more at his earliest convenience.\n\n14. Then, S spoke about the presidential race and stated that the Gobernacion Secretary Echevarria would be the PRI official candidate and that the public announcement to that effect would be made on Sept 19. P phoned this info to ARCHBOLD. See Attachment.\n\nEH Fernald\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nFROM: CUBA/PRELEMENT\n\nSUBJECT: Recent and Proposed Contact Between LIREALM-1 and ADEIHEARD\n\n1. At the 5 September 1969 meeting between LIREALM-1 and Andrew E. PELLEMENT, the following information was received from and discussed with LIREALM-1:\n\n   a. LIREALM-1, following Station advice, the recent incident where ADEIHEARD approached LIREALM-1 with an offer to pay LIREALM-1 for any information he could obtain from the U.S. Embassy, has avoided contact with ADEIHEARD at the French Club. LIREALM-1's wife, an almost daily visitor to the Club, has been asked by LIREALM-1 to note ADEIHEARD's activities and associates and report anything interesting to LIREALM-1.\n\n   b. Mrs. LIREALM recently told LIREALM-1 that for a number of consecutive Saturdays, ADEIHEARD had brought a young lady, whom Mrs. LIREALM thinks to be German, to the Club as his guest. Mrs. LIREALM did not attempt to determine the identity of the female, but reported the information to her husband. She has noted no other items of interest in ADEIHEARD's pattern of activities at the Club. He has not seemed to single out any individual as a tennis partner, nor is he frequently seen socializing with anyone in particular while at the Club.\n\n2. LIREALM-1 was advised that the Station had learned that ADEIHEARD will not return to MEXHARSH immediately as originally thought, but he will probably remain in Mexico for another five months. LIREALM-1 was told that this information was not yet public knowledge, but the Station would like LIREALM-1 to confirm this if possible. This led to a general discussion of LIREALM-1's association with ADEIHEARD since the recent incident. LIREALM-1 was instructed that it was not the Station's wish that he avoid contact with ADEIHEARD, but rather that he not single out ADEIHEARD for special attention or closely court his friendship. It is the writer's opinion that a sufficient time has elapsed since the last incident for LIREALM-1 to again renew some association with ADEIHEARD, and a particularly opportune chance to do so is available: LIREALM-1 and ADEIHEARD both belong (as has previously been reported) to a group of tennis enthusiasts at the Club who take turns entertaining each other in their homes. To date, all the members of this group have given parties except LIREALM-1. Mrs. LIREALM, following the incident and thinking that ADEIHEARD was soon to depart, has stated that she did not want to have ADEIHEARD in her home since he represents a government so opposed to the principles of her government, etc. Based on ADEIHEARD's extension in Mexico and the fact that the LIREALM's owe their friends a party, LIREALM was instructed to plan a party for the group and to include ADEIHEARD and his wife in the group invited. At the party, LIREALM-1 should not focus an undue amount of attention on ADEIHEARD, but should take advantage of the opportunity to renew their general friendship and let the matter, more or less, take its own head from there. As a first step in this general direction, LIREALM-1 plans to go to the Club over the weekend of 6-7 September at times when ADEIHEARD usually plays tennis to at least say hello.\nSECRET\n\n3. A second reason why both LIREALM-1 and his wife plan to go to the Club is to see if they can identify the new \"girl-friend\" of AEDIEHARD. LIREALM-1 says he almost always carries his camera with him when he goes to the club and frequently takes pictures of his wife and their friends. Under this pretext, he will try and take a picture of the girl friend if the opportunity presents itself where it will not come to the attention of AEDIEHARD.\n\n4. LIREALM-1 is preparing a written report in some greater detail concerning AEDIEHARD and his relationship with him since the incident. He will also attempt to see if his can get any more details about the girl friend from his wife.\n\n5. The substance of the above including the idea for the party has been verbally reported to C/58 and he is in accord with the plan for the party, which will be, at least in part, paid for out of Station funds.\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman: Val. Logunov + Friend\n2. Supervisor: Mrs. J. J. Francis\n3. Date/meeting: 31 August 1969 AM\n   Site: French Club\n4. Date/next mtg.\n   Site:\n5. Administrative\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n   MORE DETAILS TO BE OBTAINED:\n   NAME, CAT, PICTURES, ETC.\n   SEE 9 BELOW\n\n7. Report by salesman\n   Val was seen again with\n   the girl presumed to be\n   German.\n\n8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n   Mrs. J. J. Francis instructed not to\n   record every movement and contact\n   of Val but, record and call to our\n   attention:\n   1. Contacts when reported in\n      quantity,\n   2. Other Soviets accompanying\n      Val,\n   3. Unusual or suspicious behavior.\n| 1. Salesman | Party for Tennis Group |\n|-------------|------------------------|\n| 2. Supervisor | John Franklin |\n| 3. Date/meeting | 5-10-67 |\n| Site | |\n| 4. Date/next mtg. | |\n| Site | |\n| 5. Administrative | |\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n\n7. Report by salesman\n\nMrs. Joan Francis reports having explained to one of all included in the meeting that some family members here in the meeting were unwilling to invite the tennis group to her home as long as they were meeting as still here. The reasons she expressed involved the 969 Soviet support of the Viet Cong effort.\n\n8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n\nI agree that there is no reason for us to reverse our opinion of a reversal to Soviet aid. This time a reversal would be suspicious. Our stand was to positively oppose to an increased flow\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman: VALENTIN COVINO\n2. Supervisor: JOHN FRANCIS\n3. Date/meeting: 6-18-69, 11:30 - 1:30\n   Site: LUNCH CAFE\n4. Date/next mtg.\n   Site:\n5. Administrative\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n\n7. Report by salesman\n\n   NOTE: I WILL LEAVE IN OCTOBER. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO SEVERAL DAYS IN NEW YORK. I'M BLOOMING UP IN HIS ENGLISH FOR THE OCCASION.\n\n8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n\n   HIS GIRL-FRIEND CAME NOT WITH HIM THIS TIME. I PLAYED TENNIS WITH HIM (AND TWO OTHERS).\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman: Cleg (Lily) - Cuenca\n2. Supervisor: [Blank]\n3. Date/meeting: 6.18.69 - ISO\n   Site: [Blank]\n4. Date/next mtg. [Blank]\n   Site: [Blank]\n5. Administrative: [Blank]\n\n6. Instructions to salesman: [Blank]\n\n7. Report by salesman:\n   Auxiliary Meeting: Attache, his musical.\n   Tennis: He is better at tennis than Valentin.\n   Was seen playing w/Gloria Pinto & two other people, unknown.\n   Valentin supposed name & post.\n   According to Mr. Cleg, plays weekly & Wednesdays for a period.\n   And then a period of absence.\n\n8. Competition: [Blank]\n\n9. Supervisor's comments:\n   It appears that Cleg has increased himself and Gloria's presence.\n   Despite her obvious preference for the company of Valentin.\nPRODUCT SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman\n   KAREN ELLY + HUSBAND\n\n2. Supervisor\n   MRS. JOHN FRANCIS\n\n3. Date/meeting\n   4-10-69 AM\n   Site\n   FRENCH CLUB\n\n4. Date/next mtg.\n   11-10-69 AM\n   Site\n   FRENCH CLUB\n\n5. Administrative\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n\n7. Report by salesman\n   KAREN + HER HUSBAND CAME TO MEXICO ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO FROM CHILE. THEY LIVE IN LOMAS. HER HUSBAND IS IN THE EDUCATION DEPT. HE IS NOT IN THE OFFICIAL LIST. SHE IS A CLASS \"A\" TENNIS PLAYER. HE IS PROBABLY \"B\". HE WAS PLAYING WITH GORDON JONES ON SUNDAY.\n\n8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n   THIS COUPLE COULD MEET VALENTIN LOGUNOV. VAL IS A CLASS \"C\" PLAYER.\nPROOF OF SALES REPORT\n\n1. Salesman: Paul for Tennis Group\n2. Supervisor: John Francis\n3. Date/meeting: 11-15-69\n4. Date/next mtg.: Site\n5. Administrative\n\nCOPIES MADE\n\n6. Instructions to salesman\n\n7. Report by salesman\n   Mrs. John Francis report having\n   explaining to one of all including\n   some family known persons here\n   willingness to invite the tennis\n   group to her house as long as\n   she will probably\n   in all meeting\n   as expressed involved the 90%\n   Soviet support of the Viet Cong\n   effort\n\n8. Competition\n\n9. Supervisor's comments\n   I agree that there is no\n   reason for us to reverse our\n   opinion of accession to Soviets\n   at this time. A reversal would\n   be suspicious. Our stand was\n   to remain opposed to be reversed now\n\nFILE:\nP-11/185\nP-11/712\nContact Report\n\nSubject: IJOV/L-1 (1-3903)\n\nDate of Report: Sept 4 at Hoyo 19 Rest at 1340 Hrs.\n\n1. The meet was prearranged.\n   Next meet: Sept 11 at the same place at 1330 hrs.\n\n2. During the language class on 1on Sept 1 IIRACO'1 told L-1 that he had a lunch with ANDREWS on Aug 29 and on that occasion A accepted to come to IIRACO'1's house for dinner on Sept 15 about 1900 - 1930 hours. IIRACO'1 added that Yuriy CHEKYSHEV (F-13,642) would also attend the dinner.\n\n3. IIRACO'1 told L-1 that he wanted to invite to the same dinner L-1 with wife, Mrs. REX and Odil, but his wife refused to have more guests than the two Sov couples, because they did not have sufficient space and could not afford to spend the amount money the additional number of guests would cost. He went on to state that even this way he was in a quite embarrassing situation because he would not have money to buy more than a bottle of Castillo rum.\n\n4. L-1 thanked IIRACO'1 for thinking of him and added that he would not have been able to come for dinner that evening because he had to give a class which he was not able to cancel. IIRACO'1 felt relieved, but he appeared to be very nervous. L-1 added, as xxxxxx an afterthought that he would bring to IIRACO'1 a bottle of whisky, because his friend Octavio from Katunoro was scheduled to come to town before Sept 15 and he usually brings him a couple of bottles of whisky; if not sooner L-1 was certain that Octavio would call on him Sept 14 or 15 the latest and in that case L-1 could hand the bottle to IIRACO'1 on the evening of the party at 2100-2130 hrs. IIRACO'1 felt that this would be great and that L-1 could remain with his guests for a drink.\n\n5. L-1 commented that the above mentioned developments made it unnecessary for him to go through the ritual of asking to have his classes at IIRACO'1's place. Further, IIRACO'1 told L-1 that he had asked ANDREWS for the fishing knife L-1 had requested, but A did not know whether they had them on stock and if there were any he would bring it\nto the dinner.\n\n5. IJOVAI-I felt certain that LIBACO-1 was very nervous during the class and, especially, when he spoke about his meet with ADEISHARD and the forthcoming dinner. He went to the bathroom 4 times in an hour and a half (he usually goes twice when served the same amount of liquor). This lead L-1 to speculate that there might be something fishy in the connection with the dinner, including the possibility that ADEISHARD requested to meet L-1 at LIBACO-1's place and that his wife spoiled the plans by limiting the number of people. To keep the matter from developing into wishful thinking I told L-1 that it was possible that LIBACO-1 felt embarrassed for not being able to invite him to the dinner. L-1 commented that LIBACO-1 had no reason to tell him anything about the dinner and if he kept it to himself there would have been no reason for embarrassment. We agreed that there was no reason to speculate, but to wait and see. L-1 stated that his hopes went high because LIBACO-1 told him that ADEISHARD told him that his departure was patroned and that he did not count on leaving before the end of December '69. Difficulty in finding a suitable replacement was given as reason for postponement of departure.\n\n7. Requirement: In view of the fact that LIBACO-1 is used to see at L-1's place whisky which does not have the tax tags (stamps), because he normally gets his from Octavio (a Customs inspector in Matamoros), L-1 requested that I supply him a bottle of whisky which entered the country tax free. (L-1 usually has the Old Far).\n\n8. For his personal use L-1 would like to borrow a John Flain catalogue, the issue valid after Aug 18, '69.\n\nBIFernald\nSUBJECT: LIBERTY 1\n\nDATE: 3 Sept. 1733 - 1734, Almada - London.\n\n1. Subject was already at the meeting site when I arrived ten minutes after the hour - 1st because of another domestic and business matter. He had to leave early to pick up his wife and child and take them home, therefore asked if we could continue our meeting at a later hour, same day. I had no objection so we agreed to meet at Sunborn's, Tiber Reform, and proceed elsewhere from there point.\n\n2. Subject did not press me any further for me to his meeting with 100 as I had requested but assured me that he recalled it vividly. He then proceeded to describe it to me without any prompting by me.\n\n3. Subject met 100 at the rendezvous del refugio, 165 liverpool, at 1100 hours, 29 May, as had been arranged. They stayed in the restaurant for approximately 90 minutes. 100 asked Subj if he had seen any of his American friends lately and Subj replied that he had seen John and \"Alex\" in the usual manner, i.e., as students. 100 asked the opinion that Subj was being \"surrounded\" by ants and didn't Subj feel the same way. Subj denied that this was so, at least as far as he was concerned, but if 100 felt that some of these people were \"intelligence\" types, he, the subj certainly did not feel that way. 100 then asked Subj how he was fixed financially and the latter said he was as broke as usual. 100 then suggested that Subj could have a little extra money if he would only agree to write a report or two about these Americans. Subj told 100 that he had already reported orally all he knew about John and Alex and that he was little paid in reporting it in writing. 100 then suggested that he would pay for such reports and thus help Subj out of his financial difficulties. When asked by Subj, 100 offered to pay 20 pesos for each report, claiming that \"we have unlimited funds for this sort of thing\". Subject did not accept any condition and said that \"as a fellow Soviet I would hate to accept any money for such a favor.\" 100 insisted that this small amount would help Subj take the vacation he was so eager to take. 100 told Subj that he had bad news, he would not be able to return to Moscow on the first of Oct as he had wished. A replacement for him is not available and he therefore has no idea when he will depart. In fact he had heard that he could have brought his replacement with him to this meeting, but no luck. In any event Subject invited 100 and his wife to come to his home for a farewell (1) dinner on 15 Sept at 1200 hours. 100 asked Subj to invite Miguel and NEREDO and wife along, and Subj agreed. Subject commented to me that the 15th was a particularly bad date, having forgotten that this was a big holiday. He will let me call 100 and see if he still wants to keep the date.\n\n4. Subject told me that NEREDO had confided in him to the effect that 100 had tried to recruit him by writing reports on his friends but NEREDO refused. NEREDO made subject promise that he would not bring a word of this to anyone.\n5. I told him that we were not in favor of his playing a double agent, at least at this time. However, I would discuss the possibility of his writing a report for us with my superiors and let him know about the decision at a later meeting. I also told him to do an I.D. with a brief report as though for L.O. but to give it to us instead. He promised to do so but I have doubts that he will do it. I explained to him that a double agent is not permitted to keep money received from both sides and that any money he might receive from L.O. for whatever purpose or for any reason, would have to be turned over to us. He seemed to understand this reasoning very well.\n\n6. We met at Sembol's as an angel and I am not very happy about this site for a meeting place. Although nothing untoward happened as far as I saw, we will not meet there again. We did not have from there as I had planned to but instead as a mere sitting in a rather dark corner. I did not press a move. It is not a pleasant and I suppose with good reason, that Sembol is very active in regard to espionage in general. For example, he claimed that he did not like the meaning of the term \"resident.\" I suggested that this term could hardly have any use or meaning inside the USSR. Most of subjects' youth was great outside of Moscow, in a small village ten about 100 miles northwest of Moscow. Subject claimed that he is becoming more and more interested in working with us, not so much against the Soviet Union but for the dignity and freedom of humanity.\n\n7. I asked Sembol if he had read the Pankhurst Papers. He claimed that he read for a copy once or twice but never had been able to obtain it. I would like to read it in detail if possible. I think it was right on his eyes a bit more but I really don't know where he could get a chance to read it without revealing the fact to his wife or someone else.\n\n8. Next meeting is scheduled for 10 Sept, 2000 hours, Florence Rest.\nList of Soviets in Mexico passed out to all Case Officers on 27 Aug 69\n\nLOGINOV, Valentin Sergeyevich\nOfficial Function: Third Secretary (Consul)\nWife: Aleksandra Dmitrievna\nResidence: Ignacio Esteva 21-2 (Tacubaya)\nCar: 31 DG (69 Green Chevie Chevelle)\nIntel Status: Known KGB\nTour in Mexico: Aug 1965 -\nClubs: Consular Association, French Club\n\nHe is primarily targeted against Americans at the US Embassy and specifically RVROCK. He is a ladies man who cultivates American women. He is an extremely active and skilled intel officer who deliberately needles US citizens whom he believes to be RVROCK. Attempted an open recruitment pitch to LIREALM-1 after so accusing him. Has recently lowered requirements for an Embassy phone book and info to American female Embassy employees. Additionally has recently requested an agent to cultivate a Chinese Embassy employee from whom he wants info re relations between Soviets and National Chinese against the Chicanos. LOGINOV is scheduled to leave Mexico PCS in mid-October. Avid tennis player; has wide range of Mexican and third national contacts.\nContact reports, etc., forwarded from the field.\nUSSR, Moscow\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs,\nConsular Section,\nValentin LOGINOV\n\nTranslated by: M.A.\nOn 7 Nov. 70\n\nMexico, 2 Nov. 1970\n\nDear Valya,\n\nIt doesn't seem to be true, but it is. I am writing a letter (to you).\nSeveral times I got ready to write, but couldn't because of either laziness\nor too much work.\n\nOne and a half years have gone by since you left. My wife and I remember\nyou often, more so, because there are practically all new and some very serious\nfaces in the Embassy (now). I went to the reception on the Red Army Day, but\nsince I didn't have an invitation, they didn't let me in, even though CHERNYSH\nand NECHIPORUKHOV tried to help me. As you see, my brother, times change. In\nour days, i.e. when you were here, everything was simpler and I would say even\ngayer.\n\nWell, enough of complaining. I'll now turn to the news. The most important\nnews, at least for me, is that Tega is expecting. We are waiting for the\n\"Parisian package\" approximately in February. It would be nice to have a son,\nsince we are not going to produce more children. But if it is a girl, that too\nwould be nice. I will feel as though I am in a harem.\n\nI am studying English and French seriously. In 2-3 years my wife and I\nwant to move to Spain. I have had enough of Mexico. I have been living here\nfor 14 years. On the other hand, with the knowledge of languages, one can earn\na better living in Spain. You know yourself that life is much happier in Europe.\nLast year 21 million tourists visited Spain. One can make a good living through\ntourism, and without much difficulty.\n\nI continue working in the Institute. We bought a good lot on Rin Street and\nbuilt a three-story building. Juan Luis's wife is also expecting their second\nchild.\n\nPlease extend our big hello to your wife. We remember her often. You have\nbear\na very nice and kind wife. Looking forward to your news, we embrace you.\n\nRafael Vidlova\n\u0421\u043b\u0435\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0439 \u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442 \u043d\u0435 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d. \u041f\u043e\u0436\u0430\u043b\u0443\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u044c\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0447\u0435\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0435 \u0438\u0437\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u044f \u043c\u043e\u0433 \u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c.\n\u0413\u043e\u0440\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0441\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0438 \u0434\u0443\u043c\u0430\u0442\u044c.\n\n\u0413\u043e\u0440\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0436\u0430\u043b\u0435\u0442\u044c \u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u043b\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043e \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043c. \u041a\u0430\u043a \u0431\u044b \u043d\u0438 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u043e \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u043e, \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0430. \u0412\u0441\u0435\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0447\u0442\u043e-\u0442\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0441\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e. \u0412\u0441\u0435\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432\u043e\u0437\u043c\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0437\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0441\u0432\u043e\u044e \u0436\u0438\u0437\u043d\u044c. \u0412\u0441\u0435\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0448\u0430\u043d\u0441 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044c\u0435. \u0412\u0441\u0435\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043b\u0443\u0447\u0448\u0435\u0435.\n\n\u041f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u043e \u0438 \u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e. \u041d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0434\u0443\u043c\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c. \u041d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0442\u0435\u0440\u043f\u0435\u043b\u0438\u0432\u044b\u043c \u0438 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0440\u043d\u044b\u043c. \u041d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u043c \u043a \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0436\u0438\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044f\u043c. \u041d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u043c \u043a \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c.\n\n\u041d\u043e \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0430\u043a \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0448\u043d\u043e. \u0413\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0441\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044f\u0435\u043c\u0441\u044f. \u0413\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u044f\u0435\u043c \u043d\u0430\u0434\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443. \u0413\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043c\u044b \u043d\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0431\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043c \u043e \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0438\u0445 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u044f\u0445.\n\n\u0413\u043e\u0440\u044c\u043a\u043e \u0441\u0438\u0434\u0435\u0442\u044c \u0432 \u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438 \u0438 \u0434\u0443\u043c\u0430\u0442\u044c.\n\n\u041a\u043e\u043d\u0435\u0446 \u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\u043c\u0430.\n\n[\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c]\n| TO   | ROOM NO | DATE | OFFICER | INITIALS |\n|------|---------|------|---------|----------|\n| SB/X/EU |         | 21   |         | X        |\n| SB/X/EU |         | 3 - JAN 1973 | Fritz |          |\n| VIVIAN |         | 8 JAN 1973 |       |          |\n\n1-3 year refused?\nReference: ESBW-13096, 14 November 1972\n\n1. As requested in Reference, Station queried INBREED as to why they had included Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV (201-0285412) in their list of Soviets who had been PNG'd or expelled from various countries in the past five years.\n\n2. In INBREED's reply to our query, they stated that in the periodic \"Das Beste\" there was an extract from the Reader's Digest of 1 January 1972, of a book titled \"Moscow's Attack on Mexico\" by John Barron. From this article it was learned that the KGB officer LOGINOV met secretly with Mexican students at the time of the student demonstrations in Mexico in 1968. In March 1971, when five Soviet officials were PNG'd from Mexico, it was believed that Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV was among those ousted.\n\n3. Upon learning that LOGINOV served in the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City as Third Secretary/Vice Counsel from August 1965 to October 1969, INBREED has now advised the Station that LOGINOV's name erroneously appeared in their list of Soviets who had been PNG'd.\n\nRonda W. SCHWEERS\n\nDistribution:\nC/SB\n3-C/EUR\nE2 IMPDET\n\nCS COPY\n\nDATE: 20 December 1972\nSECRET\n\nLOGINOV, Valentin Sergeyevich\n\nBorn: 23 December 1927, Moscow.\n\nWife: Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, born 20 August 1928, Moscow\n\nChildren: Two\n\nLOGINOV was an Attache at the Soviet Embassy in Havana from September 1960 to September 1963. He was Third Secretary/Vice Consul at the Embassy in Mexico City from August 1965 to October 1969, replacing NECHIPORENKO. We have no information to indicate he has ever been expelled from a country. He accompanied a Soviet soccer team on a Latin American tour as escort and interpreter December 1961.\n\nLanguages: Fluent Spanish and poor English\n**SECRET**\n\n**EXTRACT AND CROSS REFERENCE**\n\n| DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION |  |\n|-------------------------|--|\n| DOC. SYMBOL & NO.       |  |\n| DATE OF DOC.            |  |\n| FILE CLASSIFICATION OF RECORD COPY |  |\n\n| DOC. SUBJECT |  |\n|--------------|--|\n\n| SOURCE INFORMATION |  |\n|-------------------|--|\n| SOURCE CRYPTOKEY |  |\n| DATE OF INFO.     |  |\n| EVALUATION        |  |\n\n**TEXT OF EXTRACT (Also cite doc. distribution, Dissem. No., etc. - if applicable)**\n\nLOGINOV, VALENTIN\n201-285412\nSEX M 000 7\nCIT ?\nOCC ?\nNAME APPEARS ON LIST FROM SWISS INTEL SERV WHICH REQUESTS BIO DATA/PHOTOS OF SGVS PNGD OR EXPELLED FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES DURING LAST FIVE YRS\n\nR 7202032C49\n\nIndicate The Subject, Project Or 201 File No. In Which This Form Is To Be Filed.\n\n| SUBJECT OF 201 (Last, First, Middle) |  |\n|-------------------------------------|--|\n| 201-7, 5, 4/12                      |  |\n| DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION | FILE CLASSIFICATION OF RECORD COPY |\n|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|\n| DOC. SYMBOL & NO.       |                                   |\n| DATE OF DOC.            |                                   |\n\n| DOC. SUBJECT            |                                   |\n\n| SOURCE INFORMATION      | EVALUATION                        |\n|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|\n| SOURCE CRYPTOGRAPHY     | DATE OF INFO.                      |\n\nTEXT OF EXTRACT (Also cite doc. distribution, Dissec. No., etc. - if applicable)\n\nLOGINOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH\n201-285412\nSEX M DOB. 7\nCIT USSR\nGCC 3RD SECY\nSOVIET EMBASSY\n< MEXICO, MEXICO\n\n731\nR 7111230503\n\nIndicate The Subject, Project Or 201 File No. In Which This Form Is To Be Filed.\n\nSUBJECT OF 201 (Last, First, Middle) 201-\n| TO | ROOM NO. | DATE | OFFICERS |\n|----|----------|------|----------|\n| 1. |          |      |          |\n| 2. |          | 13/4 | D2      |\n| 3. |          |      |          |\n| 4. |          |      |          |\n| 5. |          | 28 SEP 1970 |          |\n| 6. |          |      |          |\n| 7. |          |      |          |\n| 8. |          |      |          |\n| 9. |          |      |          |\n| 10. |        |      |          |\n| 11. |        |      |          |\n| 12. |        |      |          |\n| 13. |        |      |          |\n| 14. |        |      |          |\n| 15. |        |      |          |\n| 16. |        |      |          |\n\n**FROM:**\n\nRID/AN\n\nCARROLL ED\n\nEP-813\n\nGA50\n\nTUBE QTY.\n\n**TO ACTION BRANCH**\n\nIf file no. and title shown are not proper, insert proper file no. below and forward document to RID AN.\n\n**PROPER FILE NO.**\n\n**TO: ALL ADDRESSEES**\n\nFILL IN SECTION 1 ON BACK, IF APPROPRIATE\n\n**COMMENTS**\nForwarded herewith is a completed PCQ in Spanish on Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOV. This PCQ was prepared by AEMIDRIFF and was turned in on 6 August 1970. The Station is not retaining a copy of this PCQ.\n\nAttachment:\nPCQ Form - h/w\n\nDistribution:\nC - Chief, SB, w/att\n1 - Chief, WH, wo/att\n\nCS COPY\n\n| CROSS REFERENCE TO | DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER | DATE |\n|--------------------|-----------------------------|------|\n|                    | HMMA-39325                  | 16 August 1970 |\n\nSECRET\n\n201-285412\nAntes de completar el siguiente Cuestionario para evaluar la Personalidad, s\u00edrvase suplir la siguiente informaci\u00f3n acerca de s\u00ed mismo:\n\nEdad  \nSexo  \nNacionalidad  \n\nAntecedentes sociales y culturales:\n\n\u00bfCon qu\u00e9 frecuencia ha observado usted al sujeto?\n\nCasi cada d\u00eda\n\n\u00bfCu\u00e1ndo observ\u00f3 por \u00faltima vez al sujeto?\n\n6 de octubre, 1968\n\n\u00bfQu\u00e9 tipo de contacto tiene usted con \u00e9l? (trato directo, recepciones o fiestas en las embajadas, informantes, interrogatorio de otros, etc.)\n\n\u00bfPuede usted producir una muestra de la escritura del sujeto?\n\nS\u00ed  \nNo\n\n\u00bfPuede usted suplir el nombre de alguna persona o los nombres de varias personas que en su opini\u00f3n est\u00e9n capacitadas para suministrar informaci\u00f3n sobre el sujeto? En otras palabras, personas con suficiente conocimiento para completar al menos parte de este cuestionario.\nCUENTIONARIO PARA EVALUAR LA PERSONALIDAD\n\nI. DESCRIPCI\u00d3N\n\n1. **Descripci\u00f3n general** (Marque la descripci\u00f3n m\u00e1s apropiada)\n\n1.01 Viril, at\u00edpico, pr\u00e1ctico, de f\u00e1cil trato social (masculino)\n\n1.02 Viril, robusto, pr\u00e1ctico, cauto en su trato social (autoritario)\n\n1.03 Blando y afectivo pero socialmente agradable y apto (buena persona)\n\n1.04 Blando y afectivo, pero socialmente cauto y taciturno (posible quejumbroso)\n\n1.05 Masculino, de aspecto agradable y profesional, socialmente pulido (ejecutivo)\n\n1.06 Auster, preciso y sistem\u00e1tico (trabajador aplicado)\n\n1.07 Educado, refinado, art\u00edstico y socialmente pulido (diplom\u00e1tico)\n\n1.08 Sensible, intenso y ensimismado (tipo artista o profesor distra\u00eddo)\n\n1.09 Ninguna de las descripciones es adecuada. Yo lo describir\u00eda en la siguiente forma:\n\n2. **Vestido** (Marque la descripci\u00f3n m\u00e1s apropiada)\n\n2.01 Bien arreglado (elegante)\n\n2.02 Limpio (bien cuidado)\n\n2.03 Estricto (minucioso)\n\n2.04 Exquisito (refinado)\n\n2.05 Indistinto (desgarbado)\n\n2.06 Poco arreglado (no acicalado)\n\n2.07 Descuidado (indiferente)\n2.03 Mal perfumado (ajado)\n2.05 Desali\u00f1ado (chocante)\n2.10 No\u00f1o de vestir\n\n2.10.01 De acuerdo con sus antecedentes culturales\n2.10.02 Cosmopolita\n2.10.03 Pasado de moda\n2.10.04 Extremado o \u00fanico\n\n3. Caracter\u00edsticas de la cabeza.\n\n3.01 Medidas del cr\u00e1neo:\n3.01.01 De lado a lado\nDel frente hacia atr\u00e1s\nAncho __ Proced\u00eda __ Estrecho __\nAncho __ Proced\u00eda __ Estrecho __\n\n3.02 Frente:\nAncha __ Proced\u00eda __ Estrecha __\n\n3.03 Ojos:\nApartados __ Proced\u00eda __ Juntos __\n\n3.04 Cejas\na) Arqueadas __ Proced\u00eda __ Derechas __\nb) Espesas __ Proced\u00eda __ Escasas __\nc) Altas __ Proced\u00eda __ Bajas __\n\n3.05 \u00bfHay algo de su cabeza o de la estructura de su cabeza que requiera menci\u00f3n especial?\n\n4. Caracter\u00edsticas generales\n\n4.01 Edad, peso, estatura:\n4.01.01 \u00bfQu\u00e9 edad tiene?\n4.01.02 Su edad aparente es\nMucho m\u00e1s joven __ M\u00e1s joven __\nM\u00e1s o menos la misma __ Mayor __\nMucho mayor __\n\n4.01.03 \u00bfQu\u00e9 estatura tiene?\n\n182 cm\n4.01.04 \u00bfTiene apodo?  \nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfle molesta que lo llamen por \u00e9l?  \nS\u00ed  No  \n\n4.01.05 \u00bfResponde a un diminutivo (Juanito, Pepito, etc.)?  \nS\u00ed  No  \n\n4.01.06 \u00bfTiene alguna cicatriz u otra marca distintiva?  \nEn caso afirmativo, descr\u00edbala.  \nS\u00ed  No  \n\n4.02 Cabello:  \n\n4.02.01 Color  \nMuy claro  Claro  Mediano  \nCano o blanco  Oscuro  Muy oscuro  \n\n4.02.02 Onda  \nRizado  Promedio  Lacio  \n\n4.02.03 Cantidad  \nEspeso  Promedio  Escaso  \nTiende a la calvicie  Calvo  \n\n4.02.04 Cuidado  \nBien cuidado  Rizado  \nPromedio  Desgastado  \n\n4.02.05 \u00bfHay algo poco corriente en su cabello o su peinado?  \nEn caso afirmativo, describa:  \n\n4.03 Ojos:  \n\n4.03.01 Color  \nGris  Verde  Azul  \nAmarillo  Avellanado  \nCasta\u00f1o  Casta\u00f1o Oscuro  \n\n4.03.02 Usa espejuelos  \nSiempre  Para leer  Nunca  \n\n3\n4.03.03 Cristales de los espejuelos\nGruesos ___ Promedio ___\nBifocales ___\n\n4.03.04 Estilo de los espejuelos\nArmadura gruesa ___\nSin armadura ___\nArmadura corriente ___\nLentes de contacto ___\n\n4.03.05 \u00bfTienen sus ojos alguna caracter\u00edstica poco corriente que requiera menci\u00f3n especial? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n\n4.03.06 \u00bfSe quita el los espejuelos mientras habla? S\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.03.07 \u00bfGesticula con los espejuelos? S\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.03.08 \u00bfUsa alguna vez espejuelos oscuros bajo techo? S\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.04 Tex\n\n4.04.01 Color\nRubicundo ___ Oscuro ___ Testado ___\nClaro ___ P\u00e1lido ___\n\n4.04.02 Cara\na) Con cicatrices ___ Arrugada ___ Lisa ___\nb) Con barba ___ S\u00ed ___ No ___\nCon bigote ___ S\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.04.03 Describa el tipo de bigote o de barba:\n\n4.04.04 Pelo o vello del cuerpo (brazos, piernas, pecho)\nEspeso ___ Medio ___ Escaso ___\n\n4.04.05 \u00bfSe le ven pelos en la nariz? ___\n\n4.04.06 \u00bfSe le ven pelos en las orejas? ___\n\n4.04.07 \u00bfTiene su piel o el color de su piel alguna particularidad poco com\u00fan? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n4.05 Cara:\n\n4.05.01 Expresividad Expresiva __ Procedo __ Inexpresiva __\n\nMuy expresiva __ Muy inexpresiva __\n\n4.05.02 Si la cara es expresiva, es Natural __ Tensa __\n\n4.05.03 Si la cara es inexpresiva, es Tranquila __ Completamente Inexpresiva __\n\n4.05.04 En general, sus reacciones faciales son\n\nInapropiadas __ Apropiadas __\n\n4.05.05 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica poco com\u00fan en sus expresiones faciales? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n\n4.06 Labios:\n\n4.06.01 Tipo Salientes __ Prunciados __ Finos __\n\nCrueles __ Flojos __\n\n4.06.02 Sonr\u00ede a) Espont\u00e1neamente __ De manera tensa __\n\nMec\u00e1nicamente __\n\nb) A menudo __ Como el promedio __ Poco __ Nunca __\n\n4.06.03 \u00bfLo ha visto usted alguna vez sonre\u00edr solo? S\u00ed __ No __\n\n4.06.04 Si lo ha visto hacerse retratar\n\n\u00bfPuede sonre\u00edr cuando se lo piden? S\u00ed __ No __\n\n\u00bfSe ve t\u00edmido o inc\u00f3modo? S\u00ed __ No __\n\n4.06.05 Si no lo ha visto hacerse retratar\n\n\u00bfQu\u00e9 tipo de fotograf\u00eda cree usted que preferir\u00eda?\n\nSor\u00eda __ Sonriente __\n\n4.06.06 \u00bfTienen sus labios o su sonrisa alguna caracter\u00edstica poco com\u00fan o llamativa? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n4.07 Dientes\n\n4.07.01 Forma\nRegular  Procedo  \nSaliente  Desusada\n\n4.07.02 \u00bfTiene usted la impresi\u00f3n de que aprieta los dientes?  S\u00ed  No\nEn caso afirmativo, bajo cu\u00e1les circunstancias?\n\n4.07.03 \u00bfTiene dientes de oro o trabajo dental poco com\u00fan?  S\u00ed  No\n\n4.07.04 Cuando sonr\u00ede, \u00bfse le ven los dientes?  S\u00ed  No\n\u00bfFrunce los labios?  S\u00ed  No\n\u00bfSe tapa la boca con la mano?  S\u00ed  No\n\n4.07.05 Al hablar, \u00bfse tapa la boca con la mano?\nNunca  Frecuentemente  A veces  Siempre\n\n4.07.06 Matiz de los dientes  Blanco  Apagado  Manchado\n\n4.07.07 \u00bfTienen sus dientes alguna caracter\u00edstica poco com\u00fan o llamativa?  En caso afirmativo, describala:\n\n4.08 Pata\n\n4.08.01 Derecha  Ligeramente encorvado  Encorvado  \nErecto  Tieso\n\n4.08.02 Mantiene su postura  Constantemente  No siempre\n\n4.08.03 Hombros  Ancho de hombros  De hombros ca\u00eddos  \nProcedo  De hombros estrechos\n4.08.04 Complexi\u00f3n\nFlaca / Promedio / Corpulenta\nGorda\n\n4.08.05 En conversaci\u00f3n, \u00bfhacia d\u00f3nde se inclina principalmente con relaci\u00f3n a la otra persona?\nHacia la otra / En direcci\u00f3n opuesta\nDe ninguna forma\n\n4.08.06 \u00bfEs su postura mientras escucha diferente de cuando habla?\nEn caso afirmativo, describa:\n\n4.08.07 Postura sentado\na) Reposada / Promedio / Tensa\nb) Recta / Promedio / Desplomada\n\n4.08.08 Cuando est\u00e1 en un grupo, tiende a\nEstarse quieto\nMoverse sin andar\nRecostarse a la pared\nSentarse aun si otros est\u00e1n parados\nEcharle el brazo a otros\n\n4.08.09 Si su talla es m\u00e1s que la com\u00fan, \u00bfse inclina para que su estatura se avenga m\u00e1s al grupo? S\u00ed / No\n\n4.08.10 Si es menos que la com\u00fan, \u00bfse para derecho para avenirse al grupo? S\u00ed / No\n\n4.08.11 Cuando asiste a una conferencia (o pieza dram\u00e1tica o pel\u00edcula)\nSe sienta quieto y mira al conferenciante\nSe mueve en su asiento, parece inquieto, cambia de posici\u00f3n\n\n4.08.12 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica en su postura, porte o maneras que requiera menci\u00f3n especial? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n\n4.09 Manos:\n\n4.09.01 Mano dominante\nDerecha / Izquierda\n\n4.09.02 \u00bfTiene a usar su mano menos dominante? Frecuentemente\nRaramente / A veces / Nunca\n4.09.03 Tama\u00f1o de las manos: **Grande** **Grande** **Promedio** **Peque\u00f1a** **Peque\u00f1a**\n\n4.09.04 Usa las manos: **Con gracia** **De manera com\u00fan** **Torpe**\n\n4.09.05 Normalmente, sus brazos est\u00e1n: **Sueltos** **Tensos** **Promedio**\n\n4.09.06 De pie, hablando o escuchando, tiende a:\n- **Abrir y cerrar las manos**\n- **Moverse las manos en los bolsillos**\n- **Pasar la mano por la cara o el cabello**\n\n4.09.07 Cuando se mete las manos en los bolsillos, tiene mayor tendencia a ponerlas en:\n- **El del pantal\u00f3n**\n- **El de la chaqueta**\n\n4.09.08 U\u00f1as: **Limpia, sin manicura** **Con manicura** **Promedio** **Desiguales** **Sucias** **Mordidas**\n\n4.09.09 Si tiene las u\u00f1as mordidas, \u00bfhasta qu\u00e9 grado?\n- **Superficial** **Promedio** **Profundo**\n\n4.09.10 Tienen dedos: **Cortos** **Promedio** **Largos**\n\n4.09.11 Sus manos son: **Callosas** **Asperas** **Promedio** **Lisas** **Suaves**\n\n4.09.12 En p\u00fablico:\n- **Se hala la nariz, se la frota, se la hurga con los dedos**\n- **Se frota la nuca**\n- **Se pasa la mano por la cara o la boca**\n- **Se rasca alguna parte del cuerpo**\n- **Se hala la ropa**\n- **Nunca hace nada de esto**\n\n4.09.13 Pone los brazos en la mesa: **A menudo** **A veces** **Raramente** **Nunca**\n\n4.09.14 Apoya los codos en la mesa: **A menudo** **A veces** **Raramente** **Nunca**\n\n4.09.15 Sentado a una mesa o escritorio, habla o escucha con la cabeza en las manos: **A menudo** **A veces** **Raramente** **Nunca**\n4.09.16 Mientras habla, tiende a Cerrar los ojos\nPonerse la mano sobre los ojos\nA menudo A veces Raramente Nunca\n\n4.09.17 Si cierra o se cubre los ojos, se inclina m\u00e1s a hacerlo\nCuando trata de explicar algo\nCuando escucha a otra persona\n\n4.09.18 \u00bfTamborilea en la mesa con los dedos?\nNunca A veces A menudo\n\n4.09.19 Se inclina m\u00e1s a hacer esto cuando\nHabla Escucha Piensa\n\n4.09.20 Acostumbra Traqueterar con las monedas en el bolsillo\nJuguetear con alg\u00fan objeto\nA menudo Algunas veces Raramente Nunca\n\n4.09.21 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica en sus manos o brazos que requiera menci\u00f3n especial? En caso afirmativo, describala.\n\n4.10 Pies\n\n4.10.01 \u00bfTiene a usar primero uno u otro pie?\nIzquierdo Derecho\n\n4.10.02 Caminando con otro, \u00bfse esfuerza por ir al par? S\u00ed No\n\n4.10.03 \u00bfCruza los pies por los tobillos cuando se sienta? S\u00ed No\n\n4.10.04 De ser as\u00ed, \u00bfqu\u00e9 pie va encima? Izquierdo Derecho\n\n4.10.05 Cruza las piernas\nSolamente cuando cambia de orientaci\u00f3n\nTan pronto como se sienta\nUn rato despu\u00e9s de sentarse\nA veces Nunca\n\n4.10.06 Si cruza las piernas, \u00bfqu\u00e9 pierna va encima? La izquierda La derecha Depende de c\u00f3mo est\u00e1 sentado\n\n4.10.07 \u00bfCambia la pierna que cruza?\nDepende de su orientaci\u00f3n relativa\nCon frecuencia A veces Nunca\n4.10.03 Comparado con la mayor\u00eda, camina\nMis r\u00e1pido ___ Mis despacio ___ A igual velocidad ___\n\n4.10.07 Si su paso no va al par con el de usted, \u00bflo nota y cambia de paso?\nS\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.10.10 En conversaci\u00f3n, cuando se interesa con calor,\nDescruza las piernas y se inclina hacia delante ___\nDescruza las piernas y se inclina hacia atr\u00e1s ___\nCruza las piernas y se sienta derecho ___\nCambia a una posici\u00f3n m\u00e1s derecha ___\nCambia a una posici\u00f3n m\u00e1s reposada ___\nCambia poco de posici\u00f3n ___\n\n4.10.11 Sus pies son ___ Grandes ___ Promedio ___ Peque\u00f1os ___\n\n4.10.12 Sus zapatos son\na) Puntiagudos ___ Promedio ___ Redondeados ___\nb) Muy lustrosos ___ Promedio ___ Mal cuidados ___\n\n4.10.13 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica relacionada con sus pies o piernas que requiera atenci\u00f3n especial? En caso afirmativo, describala ___\n\n4.10.14 Cuando tiene las piernas cruzadas,\nSe sienta quieto ___ Mueve el pie ___ Mueve o mueve la pierna ___\n\n4.10.15 \u00bfColoca el suelo con el pie?\nS\u00ed ___ No ___\n\n4.10.16 \u00bfSe mece sobre los pies cuando est\u00e1 parado y hablando en un grupo?\nA menudo ___ Raramente ___\nA veces ___ Nunca ___\n\n4.10.17 Cuando camina sus pasos son ___ Largos ___ Promedio ___ Cortos ___\n\n4.10.18 Cuando camina, sus brazos ___ Cuelgan sueltos ___\nSe ponen de acuerdo con su paso ___\nSe ponen, pero fuera de tiempo ___\nSe mantienen tensos ___\n\n4.10.19 Camina con los pies ___ Hacia afuera ___ Hacia el frente ___\nHacia adentro ___\n4.11 Voz:\n\n4.11.01 Tiene timbre\n   Bajo ___ Promedio ___ Alto ___\n\n4.11.02 Habla en voz\n   Baja ___ Promedio ___ Alta ___\n\n4.11.03 En su lengua materna su tono de voz es notablemente\n   M\u00e1s alto ___ M\u00e1s bajo ___ M\u00e1s o menos lo mismo ___\n\n4.11.04 \u00bfTiene alg\u00fan impedimento vocal? S\u00ed ___ No ___\n   En caso afirmativo, describalo:\n\n4.12 Uso del idioma\n\n4.12.01 Su vocabulario en lengua materna parece ser\n   Rico ___ Limitado ___ Promedio ___ Pobre ___\n\n4.12.02 En el idioma que mejor domina, aparte del materno, tiene\n   Plena fluidez ___ Escasa fluidez ___\n   Bastante fluidez ___ Ninguna fluidez ___\n\n4.12.03 Aprende frases idiom\u00e1ticas\n   Pronto ___ Despacio ___ Normalmente ___ No las aprendo ___\n\n4.12.04 \u00bfAprende lenguas extranjeras con facilidad? S\u00ed ___ No ___\n   En caso afirmativo,\n   Aprende principalmente \"de oficio\" y experimentando ___\n   Aprende principalmente usando libros ___\n\n4.12.05 Con respecto a su mejor idioma extranjero, puede cambiar de\n   su idioma nativo\n   F\u00e1cilmente y sin vacilaci\u00f3n ___\n   Eficientemente y con vacilaci\u00f3n promedio ___\n   Despacio, con bastante vacilaci\u00f3n ___\n   Torpemente y con bastante cortes\u00eda ___\n\n4.12.06 Cuando usa mal el idioma, generalmente parece\n   No darse cuenta ___\n   Darse cuenta pero con indiferencia ___\n   Darse cuenta, con inquietud ___\n   Darse cuenta, muy avergonzado ___\n\n11\n4.12.07 En general, lo describir\u00eda como\n\n- L\u00e1ctico\n- Preciso\n- V. Locuaz\n\n4.12.08 En conversaci\u00f3n ordinaria, el tema tiende a ser primordialmente\n\n- Personal\n- Impersonal\n- Interpersonal\n- V. Cauto\n\n4.12.09 En conversaci\u00f3n ordinaria, el contenido es\n\n- Preciso y a prop\u00f3sito\n- Apropiado\n- V. Preciso\n- A prop\u00f3sito pero con ambages\n- Inapropiado\n\n4.12.10 Tiende a\n\n- Discutir a menudo problemas personales\n- Raramente discutir problemas personales\n\n4.12.11 \u00bfUsa lenguaje soez en su idioma materno?\n\n- En ocasiones\n- V. Frecuentemente\n- Nunca\n\n4.12.12 \u00bfUsa lenguaje soez en un idioma aprendido?\n\n- En ocasiones\n- V. Frecuentemente\n- Nunca\n\n4.12.13 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica poco com\u00fan en su manera de hablar o en su estilo de conversaci\u00f3n?\n\n- S\u00ed\n- No\n\nEn caso afirmativo, describala:\n\n4.13 Gestos\n\n4.13.01 Cest\u00edcula al hablar\n\n- Siempre\n- Algunas veces\n- Nunca\n\n4.12.02 Su gesto m\u00e1s caracter\u00edstico es\n\n- Apuntar con el dedo\n- Agitar una mano\n- Barrer con las manos\n- Trozar con las manos\n4.13.03 Cuando postura, sus movimientos son\nAgradados  Procedo  Nocivos\n\n4.13.04 Cuando se le habla, se pone tenso\nA menudo  Raramente\nA veces  Nunca\n\n4.13.05 Es relativamente f\u00e1cil saber si realmente le interesa un\nasunto determinado\nSiempre  Raramente\nAlgunas veces  Nunca\n\n4.13.06 Sus ojos son muy expresivos\nSiempre  Algunas veces\nRaramente\n\n4.13.07 La mayor\u00eda dir\u00eda que tiene ojos:\nHermosos  Procedo\nAgradables  Desagradables  Siniestros\n\n4.13.08 Mantiene contacto visual\nSiempre  Frecuentemente\nAlgunas veces  Raramente  Nunca\n\n4.13.09 En un grupo, \u00bflo ha visto clavar la vista repetidamente en\nuna persona que parece interesante?\nA menudo  Algunas veces  Nunca\n\n4.13.10 Cuando admira (sigue con los ojos) a una muchacha atractiva,\nlo hace\nCon desparpajo  Como cualquiera\nCon disimulo  Nunca lo ha visto\n\u00bfLo ha visto usted sonrojarse?\nS\u00ed  No\nSi su respuesta es afirmativa, describa la situaci\u00f3n:\n\n4.13.11 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica particularmente notable y que requiera\nmayor explicaci\u00f3n relacionada con los movimientos de su cuerpo,\nsus ojos, y la forma en que se comporta en un grupo?\nEn caso afirmativo, describala:\n4.14 H\u00e1bitos de dormir\n\n4.14.01 \u00bfLe gusta dormir y se duerme f\u00e1cilmente? S\u00ed / No\n\u00bfLe encanta en preparaci\u00f3n para dormir? S\u00ed / No\n\n4.14.02 \u00bfLe levanta f\u00e1cilmente? S\u00ed / No\n\u00bfPrefiere quedarse en casa hasta el \u00faltimo minuto? S\u00ed / No\n\n4.14.03 \u00bfLe gusta madrugarse? Comenzar el d\u00eda tarde? S\u00ed / No\n\n4.15 Impresiones\n\n4.15.01 De acuerdo con lo que conoce de \u00e9l, cree que la mayor\u00eda de las mujeres lo encontrar\u00eda\n\nEncantador / Agradable / Promedio / Desagradable / Muy desagradable\n\n4.15.02 De acuerdo con sus conocimientos, cree usted que la mayor\u00eda de los hombres lo encontrar\u00eda\n\nEncantador / Agradable / Promedio / Desagradable / Muy desagradable\n\n4.15.03 Si no lo conociere, usted y lo viera en la calle, lo calificar\u00eda de\n\nTipo indefinido / Promedio / Llamativo\n\n4.15.04 Sin conocimiento previo y bas\u00e1ndose s\u00f3lo en su apariencia, lo tomar\u00eda por\n\nCampesino / Dirigente / Obra / Profesional / Comerciante / Oficial Militar / Alguna otra categor\u00eda\n\n4.15.05 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica notable y que, requiera mayor explicaci\u00f3n relacionada con la impresi\u00f3n general que \u00e9l da? En caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase describirla.\nII. ANTECEDENTES\n\n5. Generales\n\n5.01 Origen \u00e9tnico:\n\n5.01.01 Sirvase describir el origen \u00e9tnico del sujeto:\n\n5.01.02 A juzgar por otros del mismo origen, es\n\nComo la mayor\u00eda\nPersonificaci\u00f3n del \"tipo\"\nDiferente a la mayor\u00eda\nImposible para m\u00ed conocer su origen\n\n5.02 Antecedentes culturales\n\n5.02.01 Si de \u00e9l depende, \u00bfcrees usted que, viviendo en una cultura extranjera\n\nNunca cambia su manera de vivir habitual?\nMantiene su manera de vivir habitual, pero muestra alg\u00fan inter\u00e9s en las costumbres locales?\nSe interesa en las costumbres locales y se adapta?\nSi puede, vive como los del pa\u00eds?\n\n5.02.02 Dentro de su grupo es\n\nComo todos los otros\nAlgo diferente de los otros\nUnico\n\n5.03 Educaci\u00f3n\n\n5.03.01 \u00bfQu\u00e9 ense\u00f1anza ha tenido? Describala:\n\nEn paralelo del Instituto de Educaci\u00f3n\nIntensivo\n\n15\n5.03.07 En su opini\u00f3n, comparado con la mayor\u00eda de sus cong\u00e9neres culturales,\n\nTiene igual instrucci\u00f3n\nEst\u00e1 mejor informado\nParece estar mejor instruido de lo que dice\nNo puedo creer que tenga la instrucci\u00f3n que dice\nSi duda de sus antecedentes, expl\u00edquese.\n\n6. Impresi\u00f3n general de sus antecedentes (Marque la descripci\u00f3n m\u00e1s apropiada)\n\n6.01 Fuerte y robusto (\"de pelo en pecho\")\n6.02 Fuerte, robusto, pero independiente (solitario, autosuficiente)\n6.03 Compasivo, sensual y comprensivo (popular con las mujeres)\n6.04 Cambiante, emotivo y a veces amargado (\"incomprendido\")\n6.05 Directo, inteligente y responsable (profesional)\n6.06 Diestro, inteligente e intenso (t\u00e9cnico)\n6.07 Sensible, refinado y mundano (que busca impresionar con apariencias)\n6.08 Sensible, de car\u00e1cter voluble, fuera de lo corriente (bohemio)\n6.09 Ninguna de estas cabe.\n\nYo lo describir\u00eda as\u00ed:\nIII. COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL\n\n7. **Impresi\u00f3n General.** (Marque la m\u00e1s apropiada.)\n\n7.01 El tipo de hombre que acostumbra ser puntual, tiende a saludar a todos con sencillez y parece sentirse satisfecho consigo mismo al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.02 El tipo de hombre que es siempre puntual, tiende a saludar a todos con alguna cortes\u00eda y parece sentirse inc\u00f3modo al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.03 El tipo de hombre cuya puntualidad es imprevisible, tiende a ser muy calido y amigable con todos sus conocidos y da impresi\u00f3n de confianza en s\u00ed mismo al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.04 El tipo de hombre puntual cuando hace una cita pero que tiende a romper compromisos con cierta frecuencia, tiende a saludar s\u00f3lo a los que ha conocido antes y es un tanto retra\u00eddo y hurado al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.05 El tipo de hombre que tiende a hacerse esperar pero es cort\u00e9s y atento cuando llega, tiende a ser preciso y correcto al saludar a todos y puede dar una gran impresi\u00f3n al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.06 El tipo de hombre muy puntual, que tiende a ser muy formal en el saludo y las m\u00e1s de las veces es r\u00edgido e inflexible al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.07 El tipo de hombre de puntualidad imprevisible, que tiende a ser atractivo y pulido en su saludo a todos y tiene gran aplomo social al entrar en una pieza.\n7.08 El tipo de hombre que a menudo llega muy tarde y no le preocupa, que tiene a ser breve y brusco al saludar y a veces da la impresi\u00f3n de torpeza al entrar en una pieza.\n\n7.09 Ninguna de las anteriores.\n\nYo lo describir\u00eda as\u00ed:\n\n8. Presentaciones:\n\n8.01 Al dar la mano Avanza hacia la otra persona\n\nLas m\u00e1s de las veces el otro tiene que avanzar\n\n8.02 Al dar la mano, el apret\u00f3n es:\n\n- Fuerte\n- Promedio\n- Flojo\n- Imperceptible\n\n8.03 Al dar la mano\n\n- Sacude la del otro\n- Aprieta la del otro\n- Deja que el otro apriete\n\n8.04 \u00bfHay algo en su manera de dar la mano que deba mencionarse? En caso afirmativo, describalo.\n\n8.05 Al ser presentado por primera vez\n\n- Mira al otro directamente en los ojos\n- Inclina la cabeza hacia el que presenta pero se fija en el presentado\n- Inclina la cabeza y no mira a nadie\n8.06 Cuando oye un nombre por primera vez\n\n- No aparenta esforzarse por recordarlo\n- Lo repite al responder a la presentaci\u00f3n\n- Pide al que lo presenta que lo repita o lo confirme\n- Pide al presentado que lo repita\n\n8.07 Si se cambian tarjetas\n\n- Lee la tarjeta y la guarda con cuidado\n- Lee la tarjeta y la mete en el bolsillo\n- Cuidadosamente la guarda sin leerla\n- La mete en el bolsillo sin leerla\n\n8.08 Cuando presenta a otros lo hace\n\n- Con facilidad y donaire\n- Con cierta cortes\u00eda o vacilaci\u00f3n\n- Con bastante torpeza\n\n8.09 \u00bfQu\u00e9 diferencia hay en su manera al ser presentado a una mujer?\n\n- Ninguna\n- La normal\n- Notable\n\n8.10 Si se porta de modo diferente, \u00bfqu\u00e9 descripci\u00f3n es aplicable?\n\n- Usa ambas manos para estrechar la de ella\n- Se acerca m\u00e1s al responder a la presentaci\u00f3n\n- Es m\u00e1s ceremonioso y distante\n- Es caluroso y efusivo\n- Es caluroso y efusivo s\u00f3lo con las chicas bonitas\n- Es muy cort\u00e9s y amable con mujeres de edad\n- Var\u00eda seg\u00fan la mujer\n- En tal caso, explique\n8.11 Al ser presentado a un n\u00famero regular de personas\n\nDedica un momento a cada una\nResponde a cada presentaci\u00f3n r\u00e1pidamente y espera la siguiente\nMira a la persona siguiente casi a la vez que saluda a la que acaba de conocer\n\n8.12 En general, \u00bfle parece a usted persona que\n\nSiempre recuerda un nombre?\nTiene retenci\u00f3n normal?\nRecuerda nombres con dificultad?\nRecuerda nombres muy mal?\n\n8.13 \u00bfLe ha pedido a usted alguna vez que vuelva a identificar a una persona a quien ya usted le ha presentado anteriormente?\n\nNo  S\u00ed  \n\n9. H\u00e1bitos de fumar y comer\n\n9.01 H\u00e1bito de fumar:\n\n9.01.01 Diga si fuma\n\nCigarrillos  Tabacos  Pipa\n\nPor costumbre  Por costumbre  Por costumbre\n\nA veces  A veces  A veces\n\nNunca  Nunca  Nunca\n\n9.01.02 \u00bfCu\u00e1nto fuma?\n\nMucho  Promedio  Poco\n9.01.03 Diga si usa su propio Encendedor Paquete de f\u00f3sforos\n9.01.04 Diga si es el tipo de persona que\nSiempre pide lumbre\nA menudo pide lumbre\nGeneralmente tiene su propia lumbre\nSiempre tiene su propia lumbre\n9.01.05 Diga si usa boquilla Con cigarrillos Con pipa\nSiempre Siempre\nA veces A veces\nNunca Nunca\n9.01.06 Despunta los tabacos Siempre A veces Con los dientes\n9.01.07 Diga si cuida la pipa Minuciosamente Como todos\nNo la cuida\n9.01.08 Al encender un cigarrillo\nBaja visiblemente la cabeza y ahueca las manos\nLo hace sin ceremonia mientras habla\n9.01.09 \u00bfLo ha visto usted retener un cigarrillo sin encender y aguardar una pausa en la conversaci\u00f3n para encenderlo? S\u00ed No\n9.01.11 \u00bfLo ha visto usted retener en la boca un tabaco, una pipa o un cigarrillo sin encender? S\u00ed No\n9.01.12 Es fumador constante --\nEnciende un cigarrillo con otro\nPasa hasta la colilla y enseguida enciende otro\nSiempre tiene encendido un cigarrillo aunque no lo fume mucho\n9.01.13 Pasa Solamente despu\u00e9s de las comidas\nSolamente cuando alguien le ofrece cigarrillo\nEntre el plato principal y el postre cuando otros fuman\n9.01.14 Muchas de tabaco en los dedos Muy notables\nVisibles\nApenas visibles\nNo tiene\n9.01.15 Al fumar\n\n(a) Deja acumular mucha ceniza en el cigarrillo\nSacude la ceniza normalmente\nPresta extraordinaria atenci\u00f3n al cenicero\n\n(b) Deja caer la ceniza en la alfombra\nPone la mano abocada bajo el cigarrillo\nSiempre usa el cenicero\n\n9.01.16 Al apagar el cigarrillo, diga si\n\nUsa el cenicero con mucha ceremonia\nParece apagarlo de manera normal\nParece descuidado al apagarlo\n\n9.01.17 Diga si\n\nFuma con visible fruici\u00f3n\nFuma con placer normal\nFuma por fumar, mec\u00e1nicamente\n\n9.01.18 Diga si es persona que ofrece lumbre a otros\n\nSiempre ______ Raras veces ______\nCon frecuencia ______ Nunca ______\n\n9.01.19 Diga si es persona que\n\nCruza la pieza para brindar lumbre a una dama\nBrinda lumbre a una dama como cualquiera lo har\u00eda\nRara vez ofrece lumbre a una dama\n\n9.01.20 Que usted sepa, \u00bfha dejado de fumar por motivos de salud?\n\nS\u00ed ______ No ______\n\n9.01.21 Diga si le ha o\u00eddo decir que\n\nDeber\u00eda dejar de fumar pero no puede\nHa tratado y no ha podido dejar de fumar\n\n9.01.22 Diga si le ha o\u00eddo decir que le molesta el olor de\n\nTabacos ______ Pipal ______ Cigarrillos ______\nSi nunca le ha o\u00eddo mencionar ninguno de los tres ______\n\n9.01.23 \u00bfTienen sus h\u00e1bitos de fumar alguna particularidad que requiera menci\u00f3n o descripci\u00f3n especial? En tal caso, descr\u00edbala.\n9.02 H\u00e1bitos de comer\n\n9.02.01 En sus h\u00e1bitos de comer es algo distinto a la mayor\u00eda de sus colegas\nNotablemente distinto a la mayor\u00eda de sus colegas\n\n9.02.02 Como es cantidad Abundante Promedio Peque\u00f1a\n\n9.02.03 El hecho de que tiene marcadas preferencias en el comer es\nMuy notable\nNo muy notable\nNada notable\n\n9.02.04 Come con\nFruici\u00f3n\nPlacer corriente\nIndiferencia\n\n9.02.05 En el comer es R\u00e1pido Promedio Lento\n\n9.02.06 Generalmente tiende a\nServirse de nuevo\nServirse del todo una sola vez\nDejar parte de lo que se sirve\n\n9.02.07 Diga si Explica la mucha falta que le hacen sus comidas nativas\nSe interesa normalmente en las comidas locales\nSe interesa bastante en las comidas nuevas o extra\u00f1as\n\n9.02.08 (a) No come mientras Habla Escucha\n(b) Si come mientras Habla Escucha\n\n9.02.09 Su tendencia a adaptarse a los modales a la mesa de la gente con quienes come es\nNotable Promedio\nNinguna; como como siempre ha acostumbrado\n\n9.02.10 Dada la oportunidad, por motivos no de negocios, sugiere un lugar preferido para comer\nSiempre A veces Raras veces o nunca\n\n9.02.11 En el restaurante. Se le hace muy dif\u00edcil escoger la comida\nEspera a que el otro pida y entonces pide lo mismo\nSiempre sabe r\u00e1pidamente lo que quiere\n\n9.02.12 En el restaurante es\nAlgo extravagante si sabe que usted va a pagar\nAtento al precio si sabe que \u00e9l mismo va a pagar\nAtento al precio no importa qui\u00e9n vaya a pagar\nIndiferente al precio no importa qui\u00e9n vaya a pagar\n9.02.13 En el tipo de persona que\nRegulamente se le compara la cuenta, no importa qui\u00e9n\nvaya a pagar.\nNo se ocupa de la cuenta si otro va a pagar.\n\n9.02.14 Cuando \u00e9l paga, comprueba la cuenta.\nDiscretamente. ___. Muy cuidadosamente (y sin d\u00edzimlo).\n\n9.02.15 Cuando \u00e9l paga la cuenta. Cuenta el vuelto sin d\u00edzimlo.\nMuestra indiferencia al aceptar el vuelto.\nToma el vuelto de manera normal.\n\n9.02.16 En su trato con el jefe de camareros es ___.\nAgresivo ___. Normal y convencional ___.\nAlgo servil ___. Brusco ___.\n\n9.02.17 Si no le place el servicio tiende a quejarse.\nA su acompa\u00f1ante ___. Directamente ___. No se queja ___.\n\n9.02.18 Trata a los camareros ___. Seg\u00fan la costumbre general.\nCon excesiva confianza ___. Con desusada cortes\u00eda ___.\n\n9.02.19 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica en sus h\u00e1bitos de comer o en sus\nmaneras que merezca mencionar especial? De ser as\u00ed, describala:\n\n9.03 Impresi\u00f3n general de sus h\u00e1bitos de comer y fumar. (Marque la\ndescripci\u00f3n m\u00e1s apropiada).\n\n9.03.01 Persona de enorme apetito y preferencias bien definidas.\nCome y fuma con bastante fruici\u00f3n, pero tiende a ser un\npoco r\u00fastico y tosco. Es f\u00e1cil imaginarlo comiendo grandes\nemparedados y tomando cerveza con sus amigos en la taberna\ndel barrio.\n\n9.03.02 Persona de enorme apetito y preferencias limitadas. Come\ny fuma con fruici\u00f3n pero sus modales son definitivamente\ntoscos y r\u00fasticos. Es f\u00e1cil imaginar su aspereza con el\ncamarero que le sirve comida extra\u00f1a o preparada de manera\ndesusada.\n\n9.03.03 Persona de comer sensual que conoce todos los restaurantes\ny sus especialidades. Se enoga en que otros prueben los\nplatos que \u00e9l ha descubierto. Come con visible placer,\nsaborea sus cigarrillos, y aunque raramente se muestra tosco,\nse preocupa m\u00e1s de su comida que de sus modales. Es f\u00e1cil\nimaginarlo cocinando y sirviendo platos especiales a sus\namigos.\n9.03.04 Persona de comer sensual que tiende a comer solo si puede. Parece comer de todo y tiene cierto aire de gil\u00f3n. Come con visible fruici\u00f3n, saborea sus cigarrillos y luego se queda a la mesa solo, regode\u00e1ndose. Es f\u00e1cil imaginarlo solo rondando la mesa de los bocadillos en un ed\u00e9n, golosinando.\n\n9.03.05 Persona de comer rutinario que generalmente hace lo que los dem\u00e1s. Probablemente padece de alergias que le impiden comer ciertos alimentos. Da la impresi\u00f3n de gustarle m\u00e1s fumar que comer, pero sus modales a la mesa se adaptan a cualquier situaci\u00f3n. Es f\u00e1cil imaginarlo tomando pastillas digestivas en su cuarto.\n\n9.03.06 Persona de comer rutinario que generalmente hace lo que los dem\u00e1s. Come con alg\u00fan desgano y raras veces habla de lo que le gusta o no le gusta. Fuma cada vez que puede, pero m\u00e1s mec\u00e1nicamente que con fruici\u00f3n. Por lo general trata de adaptar sus modales a la situaci\u00f3n pero posiblemente con alguna torpeza y sin disimulo. Es f\u00e1cil imaginarlo comiendo algo a la carrera en alg\u00fan puesto callejero a cualquier hora.\n\n9.03.07 Gastr\u00f3nomo cuyo refinamiento en el comer es pronunciado y extenso. A la mesa es muy ritualista y para \u00e9l el ambiente y el servicio son casi tan importantes como la comida. Es apreciado y culto a la mesa as\u00ed como al fumar. Es f\u00e1cil imaginarlo cambiando de ropa para comer y disfrutar buen vino y finos platos a la luz de candeleras.\n\n9.03.08 Persona de comer desusado, diminuto. Come de modo preocupado, indiferente a la comida y a lo que le rodea. No ser\u00eda sorprendente que tuviera man\u00edas gastron\u00f3micas (de vegetariano, de f\u00f3rmulas especiales, etc.).\n\n9.03.09 Nada de esto cabe. Yo lo describir\u00eda as\u00ed:\n9.04.31 Acostumbra beber\nNunca ______ Procedo ______\nPoco ______\nMucho ______\n\n9.04.02 Bebe\nS\u00f3lo (bebedor solitario)\nCon otros mayormente por ser amigable\nEn ocasi\u00f3n de ceremonia\nDespu\u00e9s del trabajo, en casa\n\n9.04.03 Parece beber\nPrincipalmente por el gusto\nPrincipalmente por el efecto\nPor ambos\n\n9.04.04 Prefiere beber\nCorveza ______ Vino ______ Whiskey ______\nVodka ______ Ginobla ______ No tiene preferencia ______\n\n9.04.05 Prefiere\nC\u00f3cteles ______ Jibola ______ Licor casi puro ______\nTragos sin mezcla ______\n\n9.04.06 Bebe\nDespacio ______ Normalmente ______ R\u00e1pido ______\n\n9.04.07 Bebe\nDe un trago ______ A sorbos ______\n\n9.04.08 Despu\u00e9s de la primera bebida\nSe empe\u00f1a en conseguir la segunda\nAcostumbra esperar a que le ofrezcan otra\nSiempre espera a que le ofrezcan otra\n\n9.04.09 En cuanto a vinos\nEs muy entendido\nLe gustan pero no es muy entendido\nLo son indiferentes\nNi los conoce ni le importa\n\n9.04.10 En cuanto a sus preferencias en la bebida\nLas explica en detalle (y con gran complacencia)\nNo habla de ellas m\u00e1s de lo corriente\nNunca habla de ellas\n\n9.02.11 En cuanto a las bebidas de su tierra natal\n\u00bfSe enorgullece francamente de ellas e invita a probarlas?\nS\u00ed ______ No ______\n\n\u00bfLas tiene en cuenta normalmente y las ofrece si corresponde?\nS\u00ed ______ No ______\n\n\u00bfLas menciona raras veces, sin insistir en hacerlas probar?\nS\u00ed ______ No ______\n9.04.12 \u00bfSe ocupa poco de si beben o no los dem\u00e1s?  \n\u00bfSirve la bebida de modo socialmente apropiado?  \n\u00bfTiene a obligar a otros a beber?  \n\n9.04.13 En comparaci\u00f3n con sus colegas, \u00bfc\u00f3mo son sus h\u00e1bitos en cuanto a la bebida?  \nEn extremo diferentes  \nMuy parecidos  \nM\u00e1s o menos los mismos  \nSi son en extremo diferentes, s\u00edrvase explicar:\n\n9.04.14 Cuando ha empu\u00f1ado varias veces, su comportamiento  \nNo cambia visiblemente  \nCambia algo  \nCambia de veras  \nSi cambia de veras, s\u00edrvase describirlo:\n\n9.04.15 Cuando bebe  \nSe como las palabras  \nHabla casi normalmente  \nHabla como siempre\n\n9.04.16 Cuando bebe, su tono de voz  \nSe eleva  \nSe suaviza  \nNo cambia\n\n9.04.17 \u00bfLo ha visto usted alguna vez ebrio de veras?  \nS\u00ed  \nNo  \nEn tal caso, se mostraba  \nSocialmente activo  \nRuidoso  \nHostil  \nTranquilo, retra\u00eddo  \nCon dominio propio  \nPoco coordinado  \nDeprimido  \nSexualmente excitado\n9.04.13 Si se lo ha visto ebrio, \u00bfcrees que en estado de embriaguez se pondr\u00eda\n\nMuy activo\nMuy pasivo\nMuy desagradable\nBastante agradable\nNunca se embriaga\nNo lo imagino c\u00f3mo actuar\u00eda si se embriaga\n\n9.04.19 Diga si lo ha visto al d\u00eda siguiente de una borrachera,\n\nEn caso afirmativo diga si es un tipo que\n\nDeja ver los efectos pero funciona bastante bien\nDeja ver un poco los efectos, pero mayormente en los ojos\ny su comportamiento general\nDeja ver los efectos y se queja mucho del malestar\nque siente\n\nNo se ve mal, diga lo que diga\n\n9.04.20 \u00bfHay algo especial en sus h\u00e1bitos de beber que requiera\nmenci\u00f3n? De ser as\u00ed, s\u00edrvase describirlo:\n\n9.05 Impresi\u00f3n general como bebedor (se\u00f1ale la m\u00e1s apropiada):\n\n9.05.01 Bebedor expansivo y en cantidad a quien no afecta mucho el\nlicor. Siempre es muy bullicioso y al beber cambia poco.\n\n9.05.02 Bebedor en cantidad que a menudo da la impresi\u00f3n de poder\nbeber m\u00e1s que nadie. Cuando bebe cambia poco de conducta\npero se transmite que si se le provoca se puede poner muy\nviolento.\n\n9.05.03 Bebedor constante a quien se ve que le gusta estar achis-\npado. En cierto modo es algo simp\u00e1tico cuando lo est\u00e1 y\npuede ser la diversi\u00f3n principal en una fiesta.\n\n9.05.04 Bebedor constante que se pone un poco m\u00e1s sensiblero cuando\nse embriaga o embriaga. Tiende a decir a otros lo simp\u00e1-\nticos que le son y a veces les pregunta si lo hallan sim-\np\u00e1tico. Da la impresi\u00f3n de poder enceirse muy repulsivo si\nse pone muy beodo.\n9.05.05 Debe ser constante a quien afecta muy poco el licor. Siempre conserva muy bien su dignidad y generalmente mantiene su aplomo aun cuando otros est\u00e1n poni\u00e9ndose muy ebrios. Sin embargo, no se a\u00edsla del grupo, o sea que da poco indicio de desagrado o aburrimiento.\n\n9.05.06 Debe ser parco que espacie los tragos. Parece beber s\u00f3lo por imperativo social. Seg\u00fan adelanta la fiesta se va poniendo reservado y distante. No es extra\u00f1o que siga hablando de su trabajo aunque no venga a cuenta.\n\n9.05.07 Debe ser parco que bebe menos y menos seg\u00fan pasan las horas. Generalmente consigue mantener una reserva de hombre de mundo para con los dem\u00e1s. A menudo se compara con alguno que se le parezca. Seg\u00fan transcurre la fiesta demuestra franco desagrado por todo lo que crea burdo o ruidoso. A menudo critica con sarcasmo la conducta de otros.\n\n9.05.08 Debe ser muy parco que o bien beba por compromiso o se niegue a beber. Generalmente no forma parte realmente del grupo festejante y se ve que lo molesta que lo hayan tra\u00eddo contra su voluntad. Tiende a estar solo y en la primera oportunidad se escabulle.\n\n9.05.09 Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones lo cuadra. Yo lo describir\u00eda as\u00ed:\n\n10. H\u00e1bitos de Conducir y de Caminar\n10.01 H\u00e1bitos de conducir:\n10.01.01 Como conductor de autom\u00f3vil\n\n| Es inusitadamente diestro | Tiene destreza promedio | Tiene desusada falta de destreza | No cuenta, pues no conduce |\n|---------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------|\n\n29\n10.01.02 Conduce a velocidad\nMuy alta  Procedo  Muy baja\n\n10.01.03 Mientras conduce y conversa, da la impresi\u00f3n de que\nPresta poca atenci\u00f3n al manejo\nPresta atenci\u00f3n procedo al manejo\nSin duda le parece m\u00e1s importante conducir que conversar\n\n10.01.04 Comparado con sus colegas, su inter\u00e9s en autos\nimportados es\nM\u00e1s o menos el mismo\nMuy diferente\n\n10.01.05 Su inter\u00e9s en el cuidado y la reparaci\u00f3n de autos es\nInsatisfecho  Procedo  Poco o ninguno\n\n10.01.06 Su cortes\u00eda como conductor es\nComo la de la generalidad de sus colegas\nComo la de la generalidad de la gente que usted conoce\nFuera de lo normal por lo cort\u00e9s y cortes\u00eda\nFuera de lo normal por lo burda y exigente\n\n10.01.07 Por lo que a usted le consta, es el tipo de persona que\nSe familiariza muy pronto en una ciudad extranjera\nUsa bastante bien un mapa de caminos o croquis urbano\nSe las arregla haciendo muchas preguntas\nCasi siempre depende de que otros lo gu\u00eden a donde va\n\n10.01.08 Como pasajero, \u00bfes persona muy consciente de la tarea\ndel conductor y reacciona al par con \u00e9ste (o sea, hace\nc\u00f3mo que aplica los frenos, se adapta en su asiento, a\nlos cambios en el tr\u00e1fico, etc.)?\nNo  S\u00ed\n\n10.01.09 Como pasajero, \u00bfes persona que parece adaptarse al\nmodo de conducir del que va al tim\u00f3n, de manera\ncorriente o apropiada?\nNo  S\u00ed\n10.01.10 Como pasajero en un autom\u00f3vil, \u00bfes persona que permanece muy en calma y relativamente indiferente a la manera de manejar del conductor?  \nNo  S\u00ed  \n\n10.01.11 Es persona que  \nNunca conducir\u00eda mientras bebo  \nTiene a saber cu\u00e1ndo no debe conducir  \nSiempre insistir\u00eda en conducir, aun estando ebrio  \n\n10.01.12 Ofrece llevar pasajero  \nCuando es apropiado  \nCasi siempre  S\u00ed  \nNunca  \n\n10.01.13 Hay algo sobre su manera de conducir que deba mencionarse?  \nDe ser as\u00ed, descr\u00edbalo:  \n\n10.02 H\u00e1bitos al caminar  \n10.02.01 Es la clase de persona que  \nCamina mucho  S\u00ed  \nCamina lo mismo que la mayor\u00eda  \nNunca camina si puede evitarlo  \n\n10.02.02 Cuando camina, su paso es  \nR\u00e1pido  Promedio  S\u00ed  \nLento  \n\n10.02.03 Cuando usted camina con \u00e9l, usualmente  \nCamina al paso suyo  S\u00ed  \nObliga a usted a caminar al paso de \u00e9l  \n\n10.02.04 Cuando camina mueve los pies  \nA derecha o izquierda (hacia afuera)  \nM\u00e1s o menos paralelos  \nHacia adentro  \n\n10.02.05 Camina  \nErecto con cabeza alta  S\u00ed  \nErecto con cabeza agachada  \nAgachado pero con los ojos en alto  \nMuy agachado  \n\n10.02.06 Cuando camina mira alrededor  \nMucho  De manera normal  S\u00ed  \nNunca  \n\n10.02.07 Cuando saluda a alguien que conoce en la calle, su cara  \nSe ilumina  S\u00ed  \nNuestra expresi\u00f3n normal o apropiada  \nNunca cambia de expresi\u00f3n  \n\n31\n10.02.03 \u00bfHay algo en su actitud o paso que sea inusual? En caso afirmativo, describalo:\n\n10.03 Descripci\u00f3n general de sus h\u00e1bitos al conducir o caminar:\n\n10.03.01 Individuo activo y despierto de paso resuelto que parece tener una mente muy pr\u00e1ctica. Le gusta reparar cosas, parece tener buen conocimiento de autom\u00f3viles y conduce de manera calmada y eficiente.\n\n10.03.02 Individuo activo que es algo retra\u00eddo (o negativo) con los dem\u00e1s. Su paso es r\u00e1pido y resuelto. Parece tener una mente pr\u00e1ctica, es muy celoso de lo que posee y lo protege con exceso y no le gusta compartirlo. Repara cosas sin alardes, parece tener buen conocimiento de autom\u00f3viles y conduce de manera resuelta (a veces hostil) pero eficiente.\n\n10.03.03 Individuo activo y despierto de paso despreocupado, que parece estar de buen humor la mayor\u00eda del tiempo. Casi nunca trata de arreglar cosas pero a menudo es muy diestro en hacer que se las arreglen. Parece tener poco conocimiento de autom\u00f3viles pero conduce de manera calmada y eficiente.\n\n10.03.04 Individuo activo que camina algo cautelosamente, como que es f\u00e1cil abochornarlo o sorprenderlo. Parece algo inseguro y lento cuando tiene que reparar algo. Evidentemente tiene poco conocimiento de autom\u00f3viles y conduce de manera cuidadosa (a veces tensa) pero eficiente.\n\n10.03.05 Individuo due\u00f1o de s\u00ed mismo y atento que camina de manera algo cortada y formal. Aunque en general es individuo pr\u00e1ctico, casi nunca trata de hacer nada a ciegas. Tiene que leer las instrucciones y prepararse antes de reparar algo. Parece haber adquirido bastantes conocimientos sobre autom\u00f3viles, pero conduce de manera algo mec\u00e1nica y muy controlada.\n\n10.03.06 Individuo due\u00f1o de s\u00ed mismo que a menudo est\u00e1 algo preocupado hasta al caminar. Cuando se toma el tiempo de reparar algo lo hace intensamente y con precisi\u00f3n. A menudo sabe mucho de autom\u00f3viles y cuida el suyo o se ocupa de que lo cuiden meticulosamente. Sin embargo, cuando est\u00e1 en conversaci\u00f3n o preocupado con algo, puede a veces ser conductor muy peligroso.\n10.03.07 Individuo due\u00f1o de s\u00ed mismo que camina con soltura y gracia. Tiene poco o ning\u00fan inter\u00e9s en arreglar cosas pero generalmente conoce los mejores lugares en que encargar trabajos y tiende a ser muy exigente en cuanto al trabajo que se le hace. Parece tener relativamente poco conocimiento del funcionamiento de un autom\u00f3vil, pero aprecia y cuida bien de uno bueno. Conduce con confianza pero generalmente a velocidad y sin darse mucha cuenta de otros.\n\n10.03.08 Persona bastante nerviosa y temperamental que camina r\u00e1pida y torpemente. Tiene poco o ning\u00fan inter\u00e9s en saber reparar cosas y se inclina a ignorar o botar las cosas que no trabajan bien. Parece interesarse poco y tener poco conocimiento de autom\u00f3viles y su manejo de conducir lo demuestra. A veces espanta tener que viajar con \u00e9l de conductor.\n\n10.03.09 Ninguna de estas descripciones cabe. Yo lo describir\u00eda como sigue:\n\n10.04 Entretencimientos, deportes\n\n10.04.01 \u00bfTiene alguna ocupaci\u00f3n favorita? S\u00ed / No / No s\u00e9\nSi su respuesta es afirmativa, describa sus ocupaciones favoritas:\n\nS\u00ed / No / No s\u00e9\n\nSi su respuesta es \"No\" o \"No s\u00e9\" \u00bfcu\u00e1l cree usted que ser\u00eda la ocupaci\u00f3n que le interesar\u00eda m\u00e1s?\n\nNo puedo imagin\u00e1rmelo con alguna ocupaci\u00f3n favorita\nColeccionista (\u00bfQu\u00e9 colecciona? Armas de fuego, monedas, libros, mariposas, etc.)\n\nComo coleccionista es Avido Inter\u00e9s y Despreocupado\n\nArtes (Pintura, cer\u00e1mica, etc.)\n\nMec\u00e1nico (motor, equipo fonogr\u00e1fico, etc.)\n\nDestrezas (carnicer\u00eda, construcci\u00f3n de modelos, etc.)\n\nIntelectual (historia, filosof\u00eda, etc.)\n\nActividades (baile en grupos, deportes ligeros como el ping-pong, juego de bolos o v\u00f3leibol)\n\nDeportes al aire libre (caza, pesca, golf, etc.)\n\nJuegos sociales (ajedrez, p\u00f3ker, bridge, etc.)\n\nEspectador (afici\u00f3n, asistir a obras de teatro, a juegos de pelota, etc.)\n\nDistracci\u00f3n mental (crucigramas, anagramas, criptogramas, etc.)\n\n10.04.02 \u00bfHa mencionado alguna vez haber tenido ocupaciones favoritas en el pasado? S\u00ed No\n\nEn caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase dar detalles:\n\n10.04.03 \u00bfC\u00f3mo baila? Extremadamente bien Bien Normalmente Mal No baila No s\u00e9 si baila\n\n10.04.04 Describa la clase de bailes que le ha visto ejecutar.\n10.04.05 \u00bfJuega ajedrez?\nS\u00ed  V  No\nSi su respuesta es afirmativa, \u00bfsabe usted si juega bien?\n\n\u00bfCree usted que probablemente juega bien?\nS\u00ed  V  No\n\u00bfSabe usted que juega medianamente?\n\n\u00bfCree usted que probablemente juega medianamente?\nS\u00ed  V  No\n\u00bfSabe usted que juega mal?\n\n\u00bfCree usted que probablemente juega mal?\n\n10.04.06 Si usted sabe jugar p\u00f3ker, diga la clase de jugador de p\u00f3ker que cree que \u00e9l ser\u00eda:\n\n10.04.07 \u00bfEs la clase de persona con quien le gustar\u00eda a usted jugar p\u00f3ker?\nS\u00ed  V  No\nSi su respuesta es negativa, explique por qu\u00e9:\n\n10.04.08 \u00bfLe ha o\u00eddo usted cantar?\nS\u00ed  V  No\nEn caso afirmativo, es su voz Buena  Promedio  Mala\n\n10.04.09 \u00bfParece saber muchas canciones?\nS\u00ed  V  No\n\n10.04.10 Cantando en grupo,\n\n10.04.11 \u00bfToca alg\u00fan instrumento musical?\nS\u00ed  V  No\nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfqu\u00e9 instrumento?\n\n10.04.12 \u00bfHa mencionado alguna vez haber tocado alg\u00fan instrumento?\nS\u00ed  V  No\nEn caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase dar detalles:\n\n10.04.13 \u00bfPractica alg\u00fan deporte activo?\nS\u00ed  V  No\n\nTennis, Voleibol, Ping-Pong\n\nFue en Tennis donde obtuve mi primera medalla.\nSi su respuesta es negativa, \u00bfqu\u00e9 clase de deportes cree usted que le interesar\u00eda m\u00e1s?\n\n- No es tipo para deportes\n- De contacto f\u00edsico (f\u00fatbol, rugby, soccer, etc.)\n- De destreza (tenis, bal\u00f3n de mano, v\u00f3leibol, etc.)\n- De destreza, individual (nataci\u00f3n, tiro de flechas, tiro de pichones, etc.)\n- Puede que le interese todo\n\n10.04.14 Juega golf? S\u00ed No\n- En caso afirmativo, \u00bflo toma muy seriamente?\n- \u00bfLo toma de manera normal?\n- \u00bfLo toma con indiferencia?\n\n10.04.15 Como jugador de golf, \u00bfsabe usted que juega bien?\n- \u00bfCree que probablemente juega bien? S\u00ed No\n- \u00bfSabe que juega medianamente? S\u00ed No\n- \u00bfCree que probablemente juega mal? S\u00ed No\n\n10.04.16 Si usted juega golf, \u00bfes \u00e9l la clase de persona con quien le gustar\u00eda a usted jugar? S\u00ed No\n- En caso negativo, explique por qu\u00e9:\n\n10.04.17 Diga si Caza mucho Pesca mucho Caza a veces Pesca a veces Nunca caza Nunca va de pesca\n\n10.04.18 \u00bfSabe usted si toma las ocupaciones de cazar y pescar seriamente? S\u00ed No\n- En caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n10.04.19 \u00bfHa mencionado alguna vez haber practicado deportes en el pasado?\n- En caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase dar detalles (incluya cualquier referencia que el pueda haber hecho a medallas, trofeos, participaci\u00f3n en alg\u00fan equipo, etc.):\n\nTennis / tenis / tenis / medallas / trofeos / medallas / trofeos / los a\u00f1os de 1989\n10.04.20 \u00bfHa o\u00eddo usted a alguien describirlo como atleta?\nEn caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase dar detalles: S\u00ed \u2611 No\n\n10.04.21 Diga si es persona que\n- Se ocupa mucho de mantenerse en buenas condiciones f\u00edsicas \u2611\n- Trata bastante de mantenerse en buenas condiciones\n- Se interesa poco en mantenerse en buenas condiciones\n\n10.04.22 \u00bfHa indicado o alguna vez tener inter\u00e9s en levantar pesas?\nEn caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase explicar: S\u00ed \u2611 No \u2611\n\n10.04.23 Diga si es tipo m\u00e1s bien\n- Musculoso y atl\u00e9tico\n- Fuerte, de buena constituci\u00f3n \u2611\n- Algo flaco\n- Poco y nada atl\u00e9tico\n- Afeminado\n\n10.04.24 \u00bfTiene inclinaci\u00f3n a la mec\u00e1nica?\nEn caso afirmativo, diga si\n- Prefiere seguir instrucciones de los libros \u2611\n- No se ocupa de las instrucciones y trata de arregl\u00e1rselas por s\u00ed mismo\n\n10.04.25 Si fuera posible suministrarle revistas y publicaciones de EE.UU., \u00bfcu\u00e1les de las siguientes cree que lo gustar\u00edan realmente?\n- El New York Times\n- Saturday Review\n- Newsweek\n- Playboy \u2611\n- Sports Illustrated \u2611\n- LIFE \u2611\n- Atlantic\n- Field and Stream\n- Popular Mechanics\n- New Republic\n- Better Homes and Gardens\n- Readers Digest (Selecciones) \u2611\n- Kenyana Review\n- Ramparts\n- Scientific American\n- Christian Science Monitor\n\nNo puedo imagin\u00e1rmelo leyendo una revista de EE.UU.\n10.04.26 \u00bfQu\u00e9 libros le ha o\u00eddo mencionar haber le\u00eddo con placer, si ha mencionado alguno?\n\n10.04.27 \u00bfQu\u00e9 pel\u00edculas le ha o\u00eddo mencionar haber visto con placer, si ha mencionado alguna?\n\n10.04.28 Si \u00e9l pudiera escoger, probablemente ir\u00eda:\n- Al cine\n- Al teatro\n- Al ballet\n- A un partido\n- De so\u00f1ar\n- A una corrida de toros\n- A un concierto\n\n10.05 Comportamiento en la oficina\n\n10.05.01 Informaci\u00f3n general (Marque lo aplicable)\n\n| De trato f\u00e1cil | Encarga su trabajo a otros |\n|---------------|---------------------------|\n| Formal        | No puede encargar a otros |\n| Atento al reglamento | Productivo |\n| Innovador     | Pensador                  |\n| Actuador      | Organizado                |\n| Pr\u00e1ctico      | Desorganizado             |\n| Dilatador     | Piensa que no le aprecian su trabajo |\n| Adicto a los memor\u00e1ndums | |\n\n10.05.02 Reacci\u00f3n de otros trabajadores:\n\n| Subalternos | S\u00ed | No | No sd |\n|-------------|----|----|-------|\n| Lo estiman  |    |    |       |\n| No lo estiman |    |    |       |\n| Es cort\u00e9s con ellos |    |    |       |\n| Se preocupa por ellos |    |    |       |\n| No se ocupa para nada |    |    |       |\n| Lo toman |    |    |       |\n| Lo consideran |    |    |       |\n| Se atribuye el trabajo que ellos han hecho |    |    |       |\n| Reconoce m\u00e9rito en justicia |    |    |       |\n| Lo tratan socialmente |    |    |       |\nSuperiores\nConf\u00edan en su criterio\nLo estiman\nNo lo estiman\nLe encargan responsabilidad\nLo tratan socialmente\n\nIV. CONSTITUCI\u00d3N EMOCIONAL\n\n11. Temperamento y humorismo\n\n11.01. Temperamento:\n\n11.01.01 En su trato con otros usted lo considera\nT\u00edmido\nCauto\nConvencional y correcto\nAmistoso\nC\u00e1lido\n\n11.01.02 Su estilo de conversaci\u00f3n es\nPoco diestro\nVaciante\nArtificial\nConvencional\nVoluble\n\n11.01.03 Su trato hacia las mujeres es\nM\u00e1s o menos el mismo que hacia los hombres\nM\u00e1s correcto y controlado que hacia los hombres\nM\u00e1s c\u00e1lido y f\u00e1cil que hacia los hombres\n\n11.01.04 En general, diga si cree que es persona que\nSe enfada f\u00e1cilmente\nPuede enfadarse f\u00e1cilmente, pero se controla\nTiene genio normal\nTiene buen genio y se altera raramente\nEs en extremo tolerante y casi nunca se enfadar\u00e1\n\n11.01.05 \u00bfLe ha visto usted alguna vez enfadarse?\nNo\nS\u00ed\n\nEn caso afirmativo, describa brevemente el incidente, incluyendo la reacci\u00f3n de \u00e9l:\n11.02.01 Es persona a quien usted\nHasta ha visto bromear con otro\nFrecuentemente ha visto bromear con otro.\nLo se puede imaginar que bromee con otro\nConsidera normal en cuanto a gustarle bromear\n\n11.02.02 Es persona\nQue notoriamente no tolera las bromas\nCon quien a la mayor\u00eda le gusta bromear\nCon quien a la mayor\u00eda nunca se le ocurrir\u00eda bromear\nA quien claramente le gusta ser objeto de bromas\n\n11.02.03 Su sentido del humor es M\u00e1s o menos como el de la mayor\u00eda\nNotablemente ausente Avispado\nSutil Seco Tosco Burdo\n\n11.02.04 Cuenta chistes y an\u00e9cdotas Nunca A veces\nFrecuentemente\n\n11.02.05 Escuchando cuentos es\nMuy bueno Promedio\nPobre\n\n11.02.06 Se inclina m\u00e1s a hacer un cuento A un grupo\nAparte a un amigo o conocido\nSolamente cuando lo animan\n\n11.03 Expresi\u00f3n general del temperamento y sentido del humor:\n(Ver la descripci\u00f3n m\u00e1s apropiada)\n\n11.03.01 Tipo carpechano que r\u00ede con gran placer.\nSu sentido del humor es directo, no sutil, y aunque\na veces es ruidoso, raramente es desagradable o\nreprobable. La mayor\u00eda del tiempo su buen humor\nes contagioso.\n\n11.03.02 Tipo carpechano que cuando r\u00ede lo hace con bastante placer.\nSin embargo, es frecuentemente seco y a veces poco\ntolerante y algo desprovisto de buen humor. Su bromas\nson directas, hasta crudas y a veces impropias. Tiende\nto ser la clase de persona que se r\u00ede de otros y no con\notros.\n11.03.03 Tipo bienhumorado que a veces puede ser considerado alegre y despreocupado. Sus chistes son avispados y oportunos. Es muy sensible a los estados de \u00e1nimo y sentimientos de otros, y a menudo puede animar una fiesta muy apropiadamente. Aunque hasta cierto punto le gusta bromear con otros, nunca es cruel o insensible.\n\n11.03.04 Generalmente es tipo algo tranquilo y afable que a veces puede volverse sorprendentemente alegre y despreocupado. Sin embargo, cuando est\u00e1 alegre a veces se extralimita y molesta un poco a los que est\u00e1n a su alrededor. Sus bromas son a menudo avispadas pero puede volverse muy sarc\u00e1stico y aun mordaz en ocasiones.\n\n11.03.05 Tipo de buenas maneras, generalmente muy convencional y propio. No aparece desprovisto de buen humor necesariamente, pero lo muestra muy raramente. A veces es dif\u00edcil conocer si est\u00e1 de buen humor, debido a su manera de esconder y frenar sus sentimientos. Tiene humorismo intencionado m\u00e1s bien que espont\u00e1neo pero nunca burdo o impropio.\n\n11.03.06 Tipo austero y sin venia humor\u00edstica, siempre serio e intenso. Es dif\u00edcil bromear en su presencia, en parte porque no responde a ello y en parte porque parece serio molesto.\n\n11.03.07 Tipo sensato y de mundo, de sutil venia humor\u00edstica. En un ambiente adecuado puede ser muy atractivo y divertido, pero su humorismo tiene cierta cualidad aristocr\u00e1tica y puede ser muy condescendiente con los que no entienden o no aprecian su humorismo.\n\n11.03.08 Tipo artificioso algo c\u00ednico que a veces puede ponerse muy impertinente. Sus chistes tienden a ser un poco desorbitados. Parece tener chistes privados que comparte con sus \u00edntimos. A veces es dif\u00edcil saber si trata de ser chistoso o sutilmente hostil.\n\n11.03.09 Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones le cabe. Yo lo describir\u00eda como sigue:\n12. **Actitudes sexuales**\n\n12.01 **Generales:**\n\n12.01.01 Su actitud hacia lo sexual es\n\n- Muy oscura\n- Dif\u00edcil de determinar\n- Normal para su cultura y antecedentes\n- Carente de inter\u00e9s\n- Indiferente\n- De inter\u00e9s bien definido\n\n12.01.02 En presencia de mujeres es\n\n- T\u00edpico\n- Corriente\n- Vulgar\n- Hostil\n- Indiferente\n\n12.01.03 Asisto a espect\u00e1culos donde act\u00faan mujeres semidesnudas\n\n- A menudo\n- Nunca\n- A veces, en grupo\n- No puedo imagin\u00e1rmelo en tales sitios\n- No s\u00e9 lo que creo de tales espect\u00e1culos\n\n12.01.04 Entre hombres, habla de lo sexual\n\n- A menudo\n- A veces\n- Raramente\n- Nunca\n\n12.01.05 \u00bfCambia en su comportamiento y/o actitudes sobre lo sexual despu\u00e9s de beber?  \n\n- S\u00ed\n- No\n- No s\u00e9\n\nEn caso afirmativo, describa el cambio:\n12.01.06 \u00bfTiene usted idea de su opini\u00f3n acerca de las prostitutas?\nS\u00ed  No\n\n12.01.07 Si no, \u00bfcree usted que es tipo que\nIr\u00eda donde una prostituta\nNo puedo imaginarlo con una prostituta\nNo tengo fundamento para opinar\n\n12.01.07 Si tiene idea, diga si dicha opini\u00f3n es de\nNegativismo hacia las prostitutas\nIndiferencia hacia las prostitutas\nInter\u00e9s en las prostitutas\n\n12.01.09 En sus relaciones con las mujeres, act\u00faa\nGeneralmente de acuerdo con su edad y experiencia\nGeneralmente con poca madurez, que no concuerda\ncon su edad y experiencia\nCon bastante soltura y equilibrio\nCon bastante inquietud e torpeza\n\n12.01.10 Al describir a una mujer atractiva es m\u00e1s probable que\nmencione\nEl pelo  Los senos\nLos ojos  La ropa\nLa figura  La personalidad\nLas piernas  No se\n\n12.01.11 \u00bfHa o\u00eddo usted a una mujer describirlo?\nS\u00ed  No\nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfqu\u00e9 dijo de \u00e9l la mujer?\n\n12.02 Impresi\u00f3n general: \u00bfCu\u00e1l de las siguientes descripciones le\nviene mejor:\n\n12.02.01 Es hombre elemental, robusto, que no parece apocarse en\nmateria del sexo. Trata a las mujeres apropiadamente,\npero hace poco esfuerzo por esconder su admiraci\u00f3n y\natracci\u00f3n. Parece viril y confiado hacia las mujeres y a la\nmayor\u00eda de ellas les agrada.\n\n12.02.02 Es hombre elemental, robusto, que ocasionalmente puede ser\nburdo o hasta vulgar. Trata a las mujeres algo desesperadamente\ny puede volverse muy insistente cuando le atrae una mujer.\nParece estar muy orgulloso de su virilidad. Su agresividad\nofender\u00eda o repeler\u00eda a muchas mujeres, pero eso a \u00e9l parece\nno importarle.\n12.02.03\n\nEs hombre algo sexual, blando, muy atento con las mujeres. Se inclina a retener la mano de una mujer m\u00e1s de lo necesario al hablarle y a menudo echa el brazo a mujeres que admira. A menudo usa lisonjas y frases de cortes\u00eda pero lo hace de manera agradable. A la mayor\u00eda de las mujeres les gustan sus atenciones.\n\n12.02.04\n\nEs hombre sensual, pero en forma pensosa e insegura. Es hombre blando que se esfuerza por no ofender. Sin embargo, frecuentemente sigue con la mirada a una mujer atractiva cuando cree que nadie lo mira. Tambi\u00e9n se inclina a tropezar con las mujeres o a tocarlas \"accidentalmente\" cuando tiene oportunidad.\n\n12.02.05\n\nEs hombre confiado y bastante pulido que es correcto y convencional hacia hombres y mujeres y es dif\u00edcil adivinar sus actitudes o intereses sexuales. En un grupo siempre se comporta de acuerdo con las reglas y usualmente de manera muy eficiente.\n\n12.02.06\n\nEs hombre confiado y preciso, con cierto aire de profesional. Es cort\u00e9s hasta el l\u00edmite y se toma las mayores molestias por encenderle el cigarrillo a una dama o ocuparse de que est\u00e9 bien atendida. Sin embargo, en sus relaciones con las mujeres es bastante distante. A veces su formalidad est\u00e1 fuera de lugar pero raramente o nunca cambia sus modales o procedimientos de acuerdo con la situaci\u00f3n.\n\n12.02.07\n\nUn hombre agradable y educado que es al mismo tiempo amistoso y de mundo. Trata a las mujeres de modo culto pero muestra poca sensualidad o impropiedad sexual. Es aseado y hasta apuesto, y puede ser muy meticuloso. La mayor\u00eda de sus relaciones con las mujeres parecen ser muy plat\u00f3nicas. Es el tipo de persona que probablemente tiene varias amigas f\u00edlicas.\n\n12.02.08\n\nEs hombre algo t\u00edmido e indiferente, considerado por algunos singular o extra\u00f1o. Muestra poco o ning\u00fan inter\u00e9s en las mujeres en p\u00fablico. En general es persona preocupada que solamente busca la compa\u00f1\u00eda de otras con intereses similares. La mayor\u00eda de las veces tiene cierto aire asc\u00e9tico y asexual.\n\n12.02.09\n\nNinguna de las anteriores descripciones cabe. Yo lo describir\u00eda as\u00ed:\nV. VIDA FAMILIAR\n\n13. Estado civil\n\n13.01 \u00bfEst\u00e1 casado? S\u00ed / No\n\n13.01.01 \u00bfVive su esposa con \u00e9l? S\u00ed / No\n\n13.01.02 \u00bfVa su esposa a funciones sociales con \u00e9l? Nunca / Raramente / Normalmente / A menudo\n\n13.01.03 Su esposa es mayor que \u00e9l / M\u00e1s o menos de su edad / M\u00e1s joven que \u00e9l\n\n13.01.04 Su esposa es extremadamente atractiva / Atractiva / Normalmente poco atractiva\n\n13.01.05 En general, su esposa es socialmente D\u00edestra / Aceptable / Incapta\n\n13.01.06 Adem\u00e1s de su lengua materna, \u00bfqu\u00e9 otros idiomas habla su esposa?\n\n13.01.07 Se esposa es m\u00e1s instruida que \u00e9l / Tan instruida como \u00e9l / Menos instruida que \u00e9l\n\n13.01.08 \u00bfEstuvo \u00e9l casado anteriormente? S\u00ed / No / No s\u00e9\n\n13.01.09 En caso afirmativo, s\u00edrvase dar detalles si los conoce.\n\n13.02 Su esposa parece tener muchas amistades / Tener pocas amistades / No tener casi amistades\n\n13.02.01 En p\u00fablico, para con su esposa, \u00e9l es muy atento / Bastante atento / Indiferente\n\n13.02.02 En p\u00fablico, para con \u00e9l, su esposa es muy atenta / Bastante atenta / Indiferente\n\n13.02.03 Describir\u00eda usted a su esposa como agresiva / Dominante / Independiente / Complaciente / Sumisa / Dependiente\n13.02.04 En la zona donde ella vive, parece estar: **Muy contenta**\n\n13.03 \u00bfHa estado usted alguna vez en su casa? **S\u00ed** **No**\n\n13.03.01 La vivienda de ellos es: **Extremo elegante para la zona**\n\n13.03.02 Como anfitriones, los esposos son: **Insatisfechos buenos**\n\n13.03.03 Como anfitriona, la se\u00f1ora parece: **Muy en su ambiente**\n\n13.03.04 Su vivienda: **Refleja la personalidad de \u00e9l**\n\n13.03.05 En general el mobiliario es: **Descolorido**\n\n13.03.06 La se\u00f1ora est\u00e1: **Visiblemente interesada en su casa**\n\n13.03.07 El comportamiento social de ella en casa es: **M\u00e1s o menos el mismo que fuera de ella**\n\n13.03.08 Normalmente son gente que: **Recibe a menudo y le gusta hacerlo**\n\n13.04 \u00bfCritica \u00e9l a su esposa? **S\u00ed** **No**\n\nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfqu\u00e9 es lo que se inclina m\u00e1s a criticar?\n13.04.01 En general, como matrimonio son:\nVisiblemente compatibles\nVisiblemente poco compatibles\n\n13.04.02 El se inclina a:\nNunca parece celoso de ella\nRaramente parece celoso de ella\nParece a menudo celoso de ella\n\n13.04.03 Ella se inclina a:\nNunca parece celosa de \u00e9l\nRaramente parece celosa de \u00e9l\nParece a menudo celosa de \u00e9l\n\n13.04.04 \u00bfTiene la esposa alguna caracter\u00edstica que requiera menci\u00f3n o descripci\u00f3n especial?\n\n13.05 Como esposo, se le puede describir m\u00e1s bien como:\n\nHombre expresivo que es visiblemente el c\u00f3nyuge dominante en el matrimonio. Tiende a proteger a su esposa y cuando es posible siempre la incluye en sus actividades sociales.\n\nHombre activo que como esposo es autoritario y dominante. Es poseyente con su esposa y tiende a ser exigente con ella.\n\nHombre expresivo que depende mucho de su esposa. Ella tiende a ser el c\u00f3nyuge dominante y \u00e9l parece estar a gusto y esperar que as\u00ed sea.\n\nHombre activo pero de genio algo despierto que visiblemente depende mucho de su esposa pero raramente lo confiesa. Puede tener alguna tendencia a ser celoso y poseyente con su esposa.\n\nHombre como la mayor\u00eda que trata a su esposa con respeto. Raramente delata en p\u00fablico lo que siente. Es dif\u00edcil conocer sus verdaderos sentimientos por ella.\n\nHombre consciente de sus deberes que toma su matrimonio muy seriamente. Su esposa corre parejas con \u00e9l y ambos toman en serio las obligaciones de familia y sociales.\n\nHombre socialmente activo que puede ser muy galante con las damas aun en presencia de su esposa. Parecen llevar vidas separadas pero muy compatibles.\nHombre tranquilo que visiblemente depende de su esposa en alto grado. Ella se ocupa de \u00e9l de manera poco ostentosa pero es visible que influye bastante en su comportamiento y actitudes.\n\nNinguna de las anteriores descripciones le viene bien. Yo lo describir\u00eda como sigue:\n13.06\nEjercita:\n\u00bfSe ocupa de la apariencia o el funcionamiento de su casa?\nS\u00ed / No\n\u00bfHace reparaciones de poca importancia por s\u00ed mismo?\nS\u00ed / No\nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfc\u00f3mo hace?\nMediamente bien? Torpemente? (S\u00ed / No)\n\n14. Hijos\n14.01\n\u00bfTiene \u00e9l hijos?\n\n14.01.01\nN\u00famero de hijos: 2\nEdades: 11\nSaxo: H / M\n\n14.01.02\n\u00bfViven todos sus hijos con \u00e9l?\nEn caso negativo, \u00bfd\u00f3nde viven?\nS\u00ed / No\n\n14.01.03\nSe ocupa de sus hijos\nDe manera insustancial\nDe manera normal\nPoco\n\n14.01.04\nSu esposa es\nMadre insustancialmente atenta\nMadre normal\nMadre insustancialmente indiferente\n\n14.01.05\nLos hijos se comportan\nInsustancialmente bien\nNormalmente bien\nEn extremo camorristas, dif\u00edciles\n\n14.01.06\nDiga si \u00e9l\nNunca habla de sus hijos\nRara vez habla de sus hijos\nHabla de sus hijos cuando corresponde\nHabla de sus hijos con frecuencia\nParce muy preocupado por sus hijos\n\n14.01.07\n\u00bfTiene alguno de sus hijos algo anormal (constituci\u00f3n enfermiza, alergias, defecto mental, deformidad o par\u00e1lisis, especial inteligencia)?\nS\u00ed / No\nEn caso afirmativo, describalo:\n\nEn hijo: [Descripci\u00f3n]\nDesde [Fecha]\nPor [Causa]\n[Fecha]\n[Descripci\u00f3n]\n14.02 Cuando esposa y familia est\u00e1n ausentes de casa\nSe ve muy solo y sin saber qu\u00e9 hacer\nMantiene probablemente su rutina\nProbablemente intensifica su actividad social\nNo se lo que hace\n\n14.03 Como padre, se le puede describir mejor as\u00ed:\n\n- Padre de familia activo y feliz, orgulloso de su familia.\n- Padre de familia activo que tiende a ser estricto y exigente con sus hijos.\n- Padre de familia activo que pasa mucho tiempo con ella. Tiende a malcriar a sus hijos.\n- Padre de familia activo pero inseguro que se preocupa mucho con sus hijos.\n- Padre activo y responsable, pero que no tolera tonter\u00edas. Su trabajo es primordial y la familia lo sabe.\n- Padre responsable y cuidadoso, cumplidor con su familia pero no muy afectuoso o expresivo.\n- Padre despreocupado que no pierde suena por la familia. La mayor\u00eda del tiempo sus miembros se las arreglan por su cuenta, con buen \u00e9xito.\n- Padre indiferente que a veces parece no darse cuenta de su familia.\n- Ninguna de las anteriores descripciones le viene bien. Puede ser descrito mejor como sigue:\n\n14.04 Diga si lleva fotos de\n\n| Su familia | Su esposa | Sus hijos | S\u00ed mismo |\n|------------|-----------|-----------|----------|\n\n14.05 En su oficina o cuarto exhibe fotos de\n\n| Su familia | Su esposa | Sus hijos | S\u00ed mismo |\n|------------|-----------|-----------|----------|\n\n14.06 \u00bfHay alguna caracter\u00edstica en sus relaciones con su esposa o su familia que requiera menci\u00f3n o descripci\u00f3n especial?\nVI. POSICION IDEOL\u00d3GICA\n\n15. General\n\n15.01 En general:\n\nEs hombre de opiniones francas y evidentes. Es capaz de expresar dichas opiniones sin importarle al parecer los sentimientos y actitudes de otros.\n\nEs hombre de muchos prejuicios e ideas dogm\u00e1ticas. Puede expresarlos acalorada y resueltamente cuando es necesario.\n\nEs hombre que posiblemente desv\u00eda opiniones de controversia con ligereza o buen humor. A veces es dif\u00edcil conocer sus opiniones porque es dif\u00edcil hacerlo hablar con seriedad.\n\nEs hombre que puede tener muchas opiniones firmes pero se lo hace dif\u00edcil mostrarlas. Tiende a disculparse y a mostrar timidez y desasosiego cuando se acerca una discusi\u00f3n.\n\nEs hombre cuyas verdaderas opiniones son dif\u00edciles de conocer. Usualmente es diplom\u00e1tico y convencional cuando se discuten temas pol\u00e9micos o prohibidos.\n\nEs hombre serio y resuelto a portarse en forma apropiada y convencional. Tiene las maneras de una persona bien disciplinada que solamente dice lo que se supone decir o lo que otros esperan que diga.\n\nEs un hombre de opiniones muy educadas. Est\u00e1 bien informado y es capaz de sostener un argumento de manera considerablemente articulada, pero a veces se vuelve c\u00ednico o utilitariamente sarc\u00e1stico.\n\nEs hombre t\u00edmido y taciturno en cuanto a sus opiniones. Es muy dif\u00edcil hacerlo expresarse sobre un tema, particularmente si es tema pol\u00e9mico.\n\nNinguna de las anteriores descripciones sirve; se le describe mejor como sigue:\n15.01.01 \u00bfHay alg\u00fan tema que tiende a ponerlo col\u00e9rico? S\u00ed ___ No ___\nEn caso afirmativo, \u00bfcual es?\n\n15.02 Es hombre cuyo patriotismo es\nPatente e intenso\nComo el de la mayor\u00eda de sus colegas\nCauteloso y no muy intenso\nDif\u00edcil de precisar\n\n15.02.01 En asuntos generales de pol\u00edtica\nGeneralmente est\u00e1 bien informado sobre la posici\u00f3n\ny actitud de su pa\u00eds\nEst\u00e1 tan bien informado como la mayor\u00eda de sus colegas\nEst\u00e1 extremadamente mal informado\nVII. HISTORIAL M\u00c9DICO\n\n16. Estado de salud\n\n16.01 \u00bfQu\u00e9 usted sepa, \u00bftiene \u00e9l alg\u00fan problema de salud? S\u00ed ___ No ___\nEn caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n16.02 \u00bfTienen su esposa o hijos alg\u00fan problema de salud? S\u00ed ___ No ___\nEn caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n16.03 \u00bfHa indicado alguna vez haber tenido problemas de salud en el pasado? S\u00ed ___ No ___\nEn caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n16.04 \u00bfQu\u00e9 usted sepa, \u00bftoma regularmente p\u00edldoras o medicina de alguna clase? S\u00ed ___ No ___\nEn caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n16.05 Es persona que: Nunca habla de su salud o de lo que siente\nHabla como todos de su salud o de lo que siente Frecuentemente\nhabla de su salud o de lo que siente ___\n\n16.06 Cuando se siente mal: Todos se percatan ___ Se nota de modo normal ___\nLa mayor\u00eda de la gente no lo notar\u00eda ___\nNunca ha sabido que se sienta mal ___\n\n53\n16.07 Su aspecto es\nRobusto y saludable\nEspecialmente como la mayor\u00eda a su edad\nEnfermizo\n\n16.08 Cabeza\nCara saludable \u2713\nBarriga grande\n\nTos y falta de aliento al esforzarse\nManos fr\u00edas y h\u00famedas\nTendencia a sudar\ndemasiado\nMal aliento\n\n16.09 \u00bfUsted sopra, \u00bftiene dieta o r\u00e9gimen especial?\nS\u00ed \u2713 No\n\nEn caso afirmativo, explique:\n\n16.10 De manera general, lo parece individuo que\nTiene mucha energ\u00eda y no se cansa nunca \u2713\nTiene energ\u00eda, pero no siempre\nTiene energ\u00eda moderada\nEs let\u00e1rgico, indiferente\n\n16.11 \u00bfHay algo en cuanto a su salud o la de su familia que deba ser comentado en detalle?\n\n1) Ha sido mucho a\u00f1os en que no es malo de ligado y estrago. Tiene dieta especial de vegetales y est\u00e1 tomando medicinas constantemente.\n\n2) En hijo padre de epilepsia desde muy ni\u00f1o. Tiene 1 o 2 ataques al a\u00f1o.\nSoviet Operational Contacts:\n\nADMIRIFF made the following comments concerning what appeared to her to be operational contacts and/or modus operandi of Soviet intelligence officers in Mexico:\n\nDebriefing conducted 23-26 April 1970:\n\nLOGINOV - During the affair between ADMIRIFF and LOGINOV, they went to the movies once or twice a week, the Futurama and Cine Mod being the theaters most frequently attended. LOGINOV always made some sort of contact during these outings, according to ADMIRIFF. She stated that he usually left his seat about 2300 hours and went out to the lobby for some time. She did not know where the contacts were actually made. Once she and LOGINOV encountered, apparently accidentally, outside the Cine Mod theater, a Mexican Army Colonel, who was introduced to her by LOGINOV as \"Col. Sergio.\" In this instance LOGINOV did not excuse himself to have a private conversation with the Mexican. \"Col. Sergio\" was described by ADMIRIFF as about 40, tall, no mustache or glasses, thick, curly hair, appeared to be of Spanish descent. The woman with \"Col. Sergio\" appeared to be about 25 years old and was introduced as his wife (which ADMIRIFF doubted because, as she put it, he didn't treat her as one would a wife, but rather as a mistress). ADMIRIFF knew nothing more about this Mexican and never saw him again.\n\nOn another occasion, LOGINOV and ADMIRIFF sat an American in front of the Futurama theater. LOGINOV introduced him to her as \"Col. Michael.\" ADMIRIFF stated that he was dressed in civilian clothes. He\nSECRET\n\nhad blond hair, was of medium height, no glasses, large grey eyes.\n\n(AEMIDRUFF thought him quite attractive). LOGINSKY told \"Michael\" that he\nwould call him the next day on urgent business. \"Michael\" was alone.\n\nAEMIDRUFF estimated that they did not have a private conversation. She\nestimated this encounter took place about September 1959.\n\nCOLCUSOV - AEMIDRUFF stated that COLCUSOV used her in the\nsame manner, i.e., took her about 3 times in all to Cine Chapultepec, then\nleft her during the movie to make some sort of contact.\n\nDebriefing conducted 12-16 May 1970:\n\nConcerning Soviet Contacts in the Mexican Police: AEMIDRUFF\nstated that she overheard COLCUSOV and DYOMIN talk about many contacts which\nthey had in the police here. She said she had also overheard KOLCHAKOV,\nBAKULIN, AND CHERKOV talk about how many good police contacts the Soviets\nhave. However, each specific example which AEMIDRUFF could give concerned\nsome non-operational favor which the Soviets could get taken care of, e.g.,\nwhen the Soviets wanted to get something through Aduana; when some Soviet\nwas missing and police cooperation was needed; getting advance notice when\nsome demonstration hostile to the Soviets was about to take place, etc.\n\nShe was not able to recall any hints that Soviets had operational contacts\nin the police; agents reporting on what the police were doing; assets who\nassisted Soviets operationally in some way. However, AEMIDRUFF thought\nthe Soviets probably have such assets.\n\nConcerning Soviet contacts in West German Police: AEMIDRUFF\nrecalled that when she went to Germany as interpreter for Soviet surgeon\nand textbook writer, FEDOR KUSOV, in January 1963 (they went to Cologne\nSECRET\nWest Germany on Commercial Ministry business), the Soviet Ambassador in West Germany stated that the Embassy had some paid agents within the West German police who helped them to protect the Soviets (in context that it was dangerous there; some Soviet official could be kidnapped by the enemy, etc.) AEMIDRIFF noted that AIVASOV was quite old and very pro-regime.\n\nMiscellaneous operational notes - AEMIDRIFF had no knowledge of Soviet safe houses or safe apartments. She stated that many Soviet visitors stayed at the Hotel Vierges or in two other hotels near the Soviet Embassy (she couldn't remember names). She did not know whether the Soviets had any sort of special arrangement or contacts in these hotels.\n\nAEMIDRIFF stated that she had attended several parties at which Mexicans also were present (she recalled specifically parties at the homes of KOLCHANOV, BAKULIN, LOGINOV) and in each instance the Soviet officer, at some point during the evening, had a private conversation with a Mexican guest. (Unfortunately, AEMIDRIFF was unable to recall the names of any of the Mexicans she met on these occasions, and of course there is no way of knowing whether such private conversations were operational meetings.) AEMIDRIFF commented that at purely Soviet parties, husbands all ways went off together and talked business, and if wives approached, they stopped their conversation.\n\nDebriefing conducted 1-6 June 1970:\n\nKORUSKIN - AEMIDRIFF commented that she thought KORUSKIN made operational meetings in the Bremen Bar, since she often saw him sitting in that bar, wearing dark glasses and trying to look inconspicuous.\nSECRET\n\n(AIMIDRIFF sometimes passed by this bar and would look inside, although she never went in.)\n\nKUPLYAKOV - Possible PCM Contact - AIMIDRIFF stated that she was told by Daniel Montiel (Daniel M\u00c9NDEZ Montiel, 201-238951), the Soviet's chauffeur, that his brother, who is a Central Committee member of the PCM and who worked on the PCM publication \"La Voz de Mexico,\" was in contact with KUPLYAKOV. In addition, AIMIDRIFF stated that she believed that Armando V\u00c9RUGO (iden with Armando MART\u00cdNEZ Verdugo, 201-851726) had an uncle, also named Armando V\u00c9RUGO, who is First Secretary of the PCM and who is in contact with KUPLYAKOV. At least this was strongly inferred by Montiel, according to AIMIDRIFF. (Editor note: Arnelco MART\u00cdNEZ Verdugo, 201-064254, who is brother of Armando, is First Secretary of PCM).\n\nAIMIDRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV always seemed to be very interested in and knowledgeable of what appeared in \"La Voz de Mexico\" and in the PCM publication \"La \u00c9poca.\" She stated that, in general, KUPLYAKOV paid so much attention to local politics and seemed to be so well informed on PCM matters that she felt certain he had something to do with the PCM.\n\nAIMIDRIFF stated that KUPLYAKOV's wife was a good friend of Salvador GONZALEZ Mar\u00edn, head of the Fondo de Cultura Popular. GONZALEZ' wife works in the Museum of Anthropology. GONZALEZ sold a lot of Soviet books, according to AIMIDRIFF, and for that reason was in contact with KUPLYAKOV, but she commented that GONZALEZ may also have been utilized by KUPLYAKOV in some other operational way. Most of KUPLYAKOV's contacts seem to be journalists. (These were the people AIMIDRIFF saw talking to him at receptions, etc.).\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n-5-\n\nARMERIFF stated that Leopoldo ARENAL, whose wife is the daughter of David Alfredo SEQUEIROS, is another Soviet asset who is handled by KURINNOV (she heard VASINSKY talk about this). ARMERIFF said that ARENAL works with Eduardo ARANJO (economic consultant for \"Minera Continental, S.A.\", mentioned in Commercial Office). She also stated she knew that ARENAL went at times to the Embassy to see KURINNOV. ARMERIFF said that ARENAL goes to Moscow every year or so. (ARENAL identical with Leopoldo ARENAL Pastor, 201-117950).\nSECRET\n\nSoviet Involvement in Student Disorders of 1968:\n\nDebriefing conducted 23-26 April 1970: AMIDRIFF stated that\nLOGINOV went out at nights often during this period and told her it was\nto make \"contacts.\" LOGINOV also stated that his work during this period\nwas some of the most dangerous he had ever done. AMIDRIFF was certain\nthat these \"contacts\" involved in student riots. AMIDRIFF related that\nonce at Auto Cine, LOGINOV made a meeting with a group of youths who came\nin another car (Falcon). Another time, some 2 or 3 days later, LOGINOV\nhad MITOPOLOSKI give him some shotguns which MITOPOLOSKI had charge of.\nLOGINOV got the guns about 2200 or 2300; the guns were returned the next\nmorning. Others who seemed to be going out all the time at night during\nthe student riots (and talking about their meetings in general the next\nmorning) were KOLSHAKOV, KOROCHKIN, NIKIFOROV. AMIDRIFF never heard\nmention of money being passed during this period (i.e., to Soviet assets\ninvolved in riots) nor any mention of any names or positions of assets\n(This not in agreement with some of Pan Jansen info). CHIKOV seemed to be\ninvolved also.\n\nDebriefing conducted 12-16 May 1970: AMIDRIFF was again\nquestioned on her knowledge of Soviet activities during the 1968 student\ndisorders. She reported that all she really knew was that the Soviets were\nvery busy during this period; that LOGINOV told her he was going out every\nnight to make \"contacts:\" that she overheard Soviet case officers talking\nat various times during this period to effect that they very busy, making\nmany contacts; that the situation was potentially explosive and a dangerous\ntime for them to be making such contacts. AMIDRIFF twice was with LOGINOV\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nwhen he met with some \"youths\" in private conversations. However, AMIRIYEV stated she did not ever hear any mention of any names of Soviet contacts in relation with the student disorders, any mention of the level of involvement of those contacts in the student organizations, any mention of Soviet guidance to the student movement, financing of the student movement, or the like. She really doesn't know that the Soviets had any contacts with direct access to information to these activities, but she strongly assumes that they did, based on their level of activity and the strong tenor that LOGINOV and other case officers gave to the idea that the contacts they were making were dangerous ones for them to be seen with during this period.\n\nDebriefing conducted 1-6 June 1970: AMIRIYEV questioned re 1968 student disorders again, for clarification previously reported details. She stated that the Soviets had some different types of rifles in the Commercial Office which served as samples of guns which they were trying to sell commercially in Mexico. One night about 11 o'clock, during the period of student riots, LOGINOV came to the Commercial Office with MITOPOLSKI (AMIRIYEV was there watching TV). They got \"some\" rifles - AMIRIYEV could not see how many or what kind. They took them out in some sort of bags. The next morning \"some\" rifles were returned to the Commercial Office, but AMIRIYEV doesn't know whether all of them were brought back. She doesn't know whether or not LOGINOV might have been duty officer for the Embassy for that night.\n\nAMIRIYEV stated that NECHIPORUKHOV's trip back to the USSR during the 1968 riots may well have been to report on the riots. However, she didn't know that this was the case and never specifically told her so.\n\nSECRET\n| X-REF. | SYM NUMBER | DOC. DATE | CLASSIFICATION |\n|--------|------------|-----------|----------------|\n| 201-285412 | HMMA-38637 | 06 APR 70 | 201-789963 |\n\nThe above document(s) is cross referenced to the 201 file cited under left margin.\nSECRET 252314Z FEB 70 CITE MEXICO CITY 2565\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESERATED REDTOP AEMIDRIF FJPASTIME\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 2557 (IN 03/735) 26 FEB 11031930\n\n1. PER REF, AEMIDRIF CONTINUED REVIEW OF PHOTOS WITH HQS DEBRIEFER AND LITENPO-14. REVIEW OF 63 PHOTOS (INCLUDING WIVES) DURING 20 AND 21 FEBRUARY SESSIONS PROVIDES FOLLOWING HIGHLIGHTS IN ADDITION TO OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WAS ALREADY KNOWN:\n\nVALENTIN BAKULIN: CHIEF OF ONE OF AEGRIP SECTIONS, EXPERIENCE IN LATIN AMERICA FROM PRIOR TOURS BRAZIL AND ARGENTINA.\n\nLEV GOLOUZOV: WORKS UNDER BAKULIN (WHICH TENDS CONFIRM AEGRIP STATUS PREVIOUSLY SUSPECTED). WHILE DRUNK AND RASTY, INFORMED AEMIDRIF SHE BEING SENT HOME.\n\nSERGEY PROVOROV: WORKS UNDER BAKULIN. AEGRIP.\n\nNIKOLAY SOKOLOV: CHIEF OF REFERENTURA.\n\nLYUDMILA SHAPOVALOVA: WORKS UNDER SOKOLOV. SERVED IN CUBA AT ONE TIME.\n\nALEKSANDR KOZLOV: WORKS IN REFERENTURA UNDER CHARGE OF PHOTO PROCESSING AND MICROFILMING. AEGRIP AT INTERNAL SECURITY AND AS WATCHDOG. HAPPY AND GEESEABLE PERSON.\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 2565 SECRET\n\nVLADIMIR TSERADZE: WORKS IN REFERENTURA BUT IS ALSO UNDER ORDERS OF BAKULIN. TIMID, DOMINATED BY WIFE.\n\nYURIY ROYANENKO: WORKS IN REFERENTURA. FREQUENTLY ACCOMPANIES PAVEL KOVALEV OUT AT NIGHT. DRINKS A LOT AND HAS TROUBLE WITH WIFE BECAUSE OF IT.\n\nYURIY KUFLYAKOV: HAS JOB SIMILAR TO KOLONYAKOV'S. VERY IMPORTANT PERSON WITHIN EMBASSY AND HAS ACCESS TO REFERENTURA. VERY REFINED AND CULTURED. MANY IICMU CONTACTS THROUGHOUT MEXICO AND ALSO CULTIVATES FRIENDSHIPS WITH DIRECTORS OF MUSEUMS, LIBRARIES AND OTHER SUCH INSTITUTIONS.\n\nBORIS CHMYKOV: VERY EXPERIENCED. SEEMS TO HAVE PERFORMED BRILLIANTLY IN PAST WITH NO FAILURES. SOMETHING OF A LADIES' MAN AND HAS, ON OCCASION, BEEN MIXED UP IN INTERNAL SCANDAL. ENAMORED OF SOKOLINA. TRAVELS FREQUENTLY THROUGHOUT MEXICO.\n\nVLADISLAV KORMUSHKIN: AEKICK. SERVED IN BRAZIL, SEVERAL MONTHS IN FRANCE AND FOUR TO SIX MONTHS IN ARGENTINA. SPEAKS SPANISH, FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE.\n\nVALERIY KOSTIKOV: AEKICK\n\nALEK KOROLEV: AEKICK\n\nVLADIMIR MAKAROV: NOT CERTAIN, BUT PROBABLY AEGRIP. HOWEVER, FREQUENTLY ACCOMPANIES BOLSHAKOV. APPEARS COLD AND CUNEL. ONE SECRET\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 2565 SECRET\n\nOF AEMIDRIF'S WATCHDOGS DURING JANUARY 1970. SPENT TIME IN RED CHINA.\n\nIOAKIM BULAVIN: ASSIGNED TO COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUT DOES NOT PHYSICALLY WORK THERE. PROBABLY WORKS FOR KOLOMYAKOV, AEGICK REZIDENT.\n\nSERGEY VERBENYEV: RIS, SERVICE UNKNOWN, PERFORMS INTERNAL SECURITY AND WATCHDOG FUNCTIONS.\n\nVLADIMIR GORDEYEV: BELIEVES HE AEGICK WORKING FOR SOKOLOV AND KOLOMYAKOV.\n\nPAVEL KOVALEV: CONSIDERS HIM DANGEROUS. SPEAKS SPANISH AND ENGLISH ALMOST WITHOUT ACCENT. HAS MANY FRIENDS IN GOVERNACION.\n\nANATOLIY STEKLYANNIKOV: BACHELOR, BODYGUARD FOR KOVALEV. WORKED FOR SECRET POLICE IN MOSCOW AFTER THREE YEARS IN MILITARY. WILL RETURN MOSCOW SOON.\n\nKONSTANTIN BOGATYREV: CHIEF OF ALL GROUPS OF MILITARY INTEL IN MEXICO. (AEMIDRIF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED CHMYKOV AS AEGRP CHIEF. STATION BELIEVES CHMYKOV POSSIBLY CHIEF FOR THOSE UNDER CIVILIAN COVER BUT JUNIOR TO BOGATYREV.)\n\nCLEG SHEVCHENKO: SPEAKS SPANISH WITH ARGENTINE ACCENT. THIS IS FIRST TOUR IN LATIN AMERICA.\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 4 MEXICO CITY 2565 SECRET\n\nVALENTIN LOGINOV: ALTHOUGH HAD AFFAIR WITH AEMIDRIFF, RECALL SIX MONTHS EARLY WAS DUE TO SOME FAILURE AND NOT TO AFFAIR.\n\nVALERIY SOKOLIN: RECALLED SIX MONTHS EARLY DUE TO SOME FAILURE ALSO.\n\nVIKTOR IVANOV: LIKED TO LIVE WELL. OWNED 27 SUITS AND OFTEN CHANGED TWO OR THREE TIMES A DAY. GOOD FRIEND OF OCTAVIANO CAMPOS SALAS, SECRETARY OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE. NOW IN MOSCOW IN CHARGE EXPORTING FURS FOR SOYUZPUSHNINA.\n\nBoris Kazantsev: Served in Cuba where had some problem or flap due to drinking and his character. Dominated by wife who influences many of his decisions. Wife works as typist in Referentura. She very jealous of husband, yet flirts with younger officers which has caused marital problems.\n\nFedor Yevseyev: Believes he is, probably aegrip. Bodyguard for ambassador and currently for charge. Believes he has no other function.\n\nMikhail Davydovskiy: Graduated MFA Academy about three years ago. Mexico is first post. Aegrip. Has access to Referentura. Frequently accompanies Kazantsev and Yevseyev.\nHAS MARITAL PROBLEMS DUE TO NEUROTIC WIFE AND FACT HE HAS,\nBY FORMER WIFE, EIGHT YEAR OLD CHILD WHO MENTALLY RETARDED FROM\nINFANTILE PARALYSIS.\n\nDMITRIY DYAKONOV: MEMBER OF CENTRAL COMMITTEE CPSU.\nBELIEVES HE AEKICK HAS MANY FRIENDS IN GOBERNACION AND RELACIONES\nEXTERIORES. SERVED IN ARGENTINA AND BRAZIL. MORE REFINED AND\nINTELLIGENT THAN PRESENT CHARGE, KAZANTSEV.\n\nBORISKOLOMYAKOV: AEKICK REZIDENT, THIRIEST IN IMPORTANCE IN\nEMBASSY. GRADUATE ACCOUNTANT, SERVED AS ACCOUNTANT IN USSR,\nARGENTINA AND FIRST TOUR MEXICO. RETURNED TO MEXICO AS REZIDENT.\nVERY STRAIGHTFORWARD, STRONG PRINCIPLES. DRINKS MODERATELY.\nCLOSE FRIENDSHIPS WITH ARGENTINE DIPLOMATS. FREQUENTLY TRAVELS\nWITH KAZANTSEV, SOMETIMES WITH BOLSHAKOV.\n\nYEVENIY FEDIN: FOURTH IN IMPORTANCE IN EMBASSY.\nFREQUENTLY WORKS IN REFERENTURA. HAS FEW FRIENDS WITHIN EMBASSY\nBECAUSE OF FICKLE CHARACTER, AND FACT HE AT ROOT OF MANY INTERNAL\nINTRIGUES BY SENDING ANONYMOUS ACCUSATORY LETTERS.\n\nVALERIY NIKOLAYENKO: AEKICK. IN CHARGE OF ASSIGNING\nHOUSING AND FURNISHINGS. SPENT SIX MONTHS IN CUA AS EMPLOYEE,\nRATHER THAN DIPLOMAT, BEFORE MEXICO. ATTENDED MFA ACADEMY IN\nMOSCOW.\n\n2. FILE: 291-835670. CP-1  SECRET\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Operation Road Course\n\nREFERENCES:\nA. Our memorandum dated 9 December 1959, same subject.\nB. Memorandum No. S-69/4745, dated 10 December 1959, same subject.\n\n1. The following comments from CAS/HEX on References are forwarded for your information. In an effort to identify \"George\", CAS/HEX obtained the following information from reliable sources concerning the 3 and 4 October 1959 meeting between Subject and the Soviets.\n\n2. CAS/HEX sources reported the presence of certain Soviets at the Soviet Embassy on the morning of 4 October 1959, which is when the debriefing of Subject took place. Although the presence of some of these Soviets have been reported previously in Reference A, the context of the observations could indicate that possibly one or more of these individuals was involved in the interview of Subject on 4 October 1959.\n\n3. Yevgeny Ivanovich FEDIN was seen entering the Embassy on 4 October at 0930 hours. He was seen working in Window #12, which is in his and Yuriy Viktorovich KUPINAYOV's office. This office is also used for receiving VIP visitors. FEDIN was seen exiting the Embassy with Mikhail DAVYDOSKY and Lev GOLIKOV at 1240 in an automobile carrying license plates \"SS 65\".\n\n4. Boris Pavlovich KOLCHAKOV was seen entering the Embassy on 4 October 1959 at 0910 hours. At 0910 hours, KOLCHAKOV was observed speaking with Vladimir Sergeyevich KOKUBIN in the garden of the Embassy, then KOLCHAKOV entered the main Embassy building by the main entrance. At 1007 hours, KOLCHAKOV was again observed in the garden speaking with Valentin Sergeyevich KOKOV, after which both went\ninto the receiving room just inside the gate into the Embassy grounds. It was a \"Soviet\" car, as described in his debriefing report, that this conversation in the garden might have occurred during one of the times \"Soviet 23\" (as described by Subject) left the room. KONSHIN was seen exiting the Embassy at 12:34 hours that day in an automobile carrying license plates \"89 DD.\"\n\n5. Valeriy Sergeyevich KONSHIN was seen entering the Embassy at 0910 hours on 4 October in the company of KONSHIN, driving an automobile with license \"76 DD.\" Other than the conversation mentioned in paragraph 4 above, he was not seen again until 1324 hours when he exited the Embassy alone. It is not known when KONSHIN left the Embassy.\n\n6. Oleg Sergeyevich KOROBEY was seen entering the Embassy on 4 October 1969 at 0940 hours driving a dual-control car from a local driving school. The car and instructor then departed. KOROBEY entered the main Embassy building and was not seen again until 1240 hours, when he exited the Embassy on foot.\n\n7. Valentin Sergeyevich LOGIKOV was seen entering the Embassy at 0930 hours the morning of 4 October 1969. He was seen exiting the Embassy in his car, license plates \"31 DD,\" at 0913 hours and was seen entering the Embassy again at 0930 hours in the same vehicle. At 1016 hours he was seen exiting again in car \"31 DD\" with LOGIKOV. The above is brought to your attention because all of these Soviets are known KGB officers (except KOROBEY, who is carried as a suspect KGB), and all have at least passable English speaking ability.\n\n8. Attached is a photograph of Comrade Ivanovich KUZNETSOV, who might have been the driver for car \"23 DD,\" in which Subject was smuggled out of the Soviet Embassy on 4 October 1969. Since his wife, Yelizaveta Ivanovna KUZNETSOVA, may have been with him, her photograph is attached. Also attached is a photograph of Yevgeniy Grigor'evich KOROBEY, who might be identical with the woman who met Subject at the gatehouse as he entered the Embassy on 4 October.\n\n9. With reference to the emergency instructions for Subject on the last page of Reference B, CAS/SS reports that they were not briefed concerning this emergency means of com-\n10. Please advise if Subject was able to identify any of the Soviet individuals he met, utilizing the photographs which we loaned to you during our meeting on 10 December 1969. We would also appreciate learning if Subject is able to identify KUZNETSOV, KUZNETSOVA, and KROSHKOVA, whose photographs are attached.\n\n11. It is requested that your office return all photographs of the Soviets in Mexico which we have passed to you previously, including attached photographs.\n\nAttachments:\n1 - Photograph of KUZNETSOV\n2 - Photograph of KUZNETSOVA\n3 - Photograph of KROSHKOVA\n\nJohn C. Murray\nChief, WH/1\n\nDISTRIBUTION:\nOrig. and 1 - 902 (w/att)\n1 - SH/XCH (for filing in AKEASTRO 201-107668)\n1 - SB/CI/O\n1 - CI/LI\n1 - CI/OPS\n1 - 201-163926 (FEDIN)\n1 - 201-744341 (KORUSKIN)\n1 - 201-284412 (LOGINOV)\n1 - 201-221160 (KOSHELEV)\n1 - 201-837232 (KUZNETSOV) (w/att 122)\n1 - 201-269710 (KROSHKOVA) (w/att 2)\n1 - 201-873878 (SCHLASE-1)\n1 - George tempo file\n1 - Chrono\n\nWH/1: LEOsborne: 1mr/3EM 4137/1973\n\nSECRET\n10) Valentin Sergeevich LOGINOV: He left on the 6th of October for Moscow, six months before the completion of his tour. He was head of the consular section and the lover of \"aya. Apparently the causes for his sudden return were 1) having been \"aya's lover; and 2) not having had good results from his work and, according to \"aya, some kind of failure. He was in Mexico on two different occasions.\n\nShe states that during the time she was having an affair with Valentin LOGINOV, who was chief of the consular section, he occasionally took her out at night to places where she knew he made contact with persons who seemed to be Mexicans. She says that she doesn't know with which persons he made contact, nor if they were \"Mexicans or not, because she never saw them, but that he, on several occasions took her to these places: the Cine \"Mod on Aves Lomas de Tecamachalco, the Cine Futurama in Colonia Lindavista, the drive-in theater called Autocinema del Valle, the drive-in called Autocinema Satellite and the Cine Tlaltelolco. When she accompanied him to those places, he left the car and she remained in it; that he would go for 10, 15 or 20 minutes to converse with those people. He never told her who these persons were nor what they talked about.\nSECRET 221715Z FEB 70 CITE MEXICO CITY 2539 (FRALLETT ACTING)\n\nIMMEDIATE DIRECTOR\n\nCESENSIZED REDTOP AEMIDRIF FJPASTIME\n\nREF MEXICO CITY 2517 (NO28714)\n\n1. DEBRIEFER REPORTS SLOW BUT STEADY PROGRESS WITH AEMIDRIF, WHO BEGINNING TO ACCEPT DEBRIEFER AS FRIEND. LITEMPO-14 TAKING LEAD IN DEBRIEFING (WHICH AEMIDRIF SEEMS PREFER AT THIS POINT), WITH DEBRIEFER CHIMING IN OCCASIONALLY AS \"INTERPRETER\". SINCE SPANISH IS COMMON LANGUAGE TO ALL THREE, MOST IF NOT ALL OF DEBRIEFING WILL BE IN SPANISH. L-14, WHO HANDLING AEMIDRIF VERY WELL AND WHO VERY AMENABLE TO ALL SUGGESTIONS FROM DEBRIEFER, IS TAKING COMPLETE NOTES AND IS DICTATING NOTES ONTO TAPE. FIRST TAPE NOW BEING TRANSCRIBED. WILL CABLE HIGHLIGHTS.\n\n2. AS OF EVENING 20 FEBRUARY, AEMIDRIF HAD STARTED GOING THRU PHOTOS OF SOVIET PERSONNEL WITH DEBRIEFER AND L-14. CLEARLY READING IS THAT AEMIDRIF HAS NO KNOWLEDGE INTEL ACTIVITIES OR CONTACTS AND PROBABLY LITTLE IN WAY OF OPS LEADS. HOWEVER, SHE SHOULD BE ABLE CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF SOVIET MISSION MEXICO CITY.\n\n3. AEMIDRIF IN GOOD SPIRITS AND ADJUSTING WELL, BUT IN SOMEWHAT POOR HEALTH, WITH COLD, FEVER BLISTERS, AND INTESTINAL PROBLEMS (FOR\n\nSECRET\n\nCC COPY.\n4. RE PERSONAL HISTORY, AEMIDRFF SAID SHE REISED BY FAMILY OF GERMAN-SPEAKING UKRAINIAN JEWS. WAS MEMBER KOMSOMOL FROM AGES 14 TO 28. SHE THEN LEFT KOMSOMOL AND CLAIMS SHE DID NOT JOIN COMMUNIST PARTY BECAUSE SHE \"MARRIED\" NUCLEAR PHYSICIST NAMED MIKHAIL ALEKSANDROVICH ALEKSANDROV, WHO DIED AT AGE 28 IN 1967. ACTUALLY MARRIAGE NOT OFFICIAL SINCE MIKHAIL'S MOTHER WAS OPPOSED, BUT EVERYONE KNEW THEY LIVED TOGETHER. GERMAN WAS AEMIDRFF'S MAIN LANGUAGE AT UNIVERSITY (SHE NOW CAN READ BUT NOT SPEAK IT, ALSO READS FRENCH AND KNOWS SOME ENGLISH WORDS). GOT JOB WITH MINISTRY OF FOREIGN TRADE, AND THRU INFLUENTIAL FRIENDS MADE THERE GOT TRAVELING ASSIGNMENTS AFTER DEATH OF MIKHAIL. WENT TWICE TO LEIPZIG, ONCE TO EAST BERLIN, AND ONCE TO COLOGNE FOR SIX DAYS. SAYS SHE HAD WANTED TO COME TO MEXICO SINCE TIME, TEN YEARS AGO, WHEN SHE HEARD MEXICAN SINGERS WHO APPEARING MOSCOW.\n\n5. AEMIDRFF SAID SHE WENT AROUND WITH AEDIEHARD \"ALL THE TIME\" UNTIL HIS RECALL, BUT SAYS THAT RECALL WAS NOT CAUSED BY THIS AFFAIR. AEDIEHARD WAS RECALLED DUE TO SOME \"FIASCO\" WHICH OCCURRED ABOUT THREE MONTHS PRIOR TO RECALL. AEMIDRFF CLAIMS TO KNOW NO DETAILS. EARLIER STATEMENT THAT HE HAD BEEN RECALLED.\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 2539 SECRET\n\nBECAUSE OF HER WAS APPARENTLY MEANT TO BE JOKE.\n\n6. AEMIDRIFF DID NOT START GOING OUT WITH URUENA AND FRIENDS\nUNTIL AFTER AEDIEHARD DEPARTURE. SHE NOW SEEMS HAVE NO DESIRE SEE\nURUENA, WHO SHE BELIEVES RAN OUT ON HER. SHE VAGUE ABOUT FUTURE\nPLANS, BUT SEEMED HAPPY TO LEARN SHE MIGHT BE ABLE STAY AT SAFESITE\nTHRU END FEBRUARY.\n\n7. DEBRIEFER BELIEVES AEMIDRIFF IS ESSENTIALLY APOLITICAL.\nSHE PROBABLY TELLING ALL, OR NEARLY ALL SHE KNOWS, PERHAPS HOLDING\nBACK AT PRESENT ON SOME PERSONAL THINGS.\n\n8. NO SECURITY PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN SAFESITE AREA.\n\n9. FILE 201-835670. GP-1\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 1419652 FEB 70 CITE MEXICO CITY 2472 (Pralleti Acting)\n\nIMMEDIATE DIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED EDITOR AERIDIFF FJPASTIME\n\nSECTION ONE OF TWO\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 2462 (IN 025/42)\n\n1. FOLLOWING IS GIST OF DEBRIEFING OF AERIDIFF EVENING\n\n12 FEBRUARY BY LITENPO-14.\n\n2. SUBJECT WAS BORN 1939 (31 AUGUST PER IMMIGRATION DOCUMENT). MOTHER DIED IN CHILDBIRTH. FATHER WAS ENGINEER WORKING FOR GOVERNMENT WHO IN 1943, WHILE WORKING IN SIBERIAN FACTORY ON MILITARY PROJECT, WAS ACCUSED OF SABOTAGE. NEVER SAW HIM AGAIN. SHE WAS RAISED BY GIRLFRIEND OF HER FATHER AND ONLY RELATIVE IN USSR IS MARRIED SISTER BORN ABOUT 1939. SUBJECT STUDIED LINGUISTICS AND GYMNASTICS AT UNIVERSITY OF MOSCOW. MARRIED (DATE NOT STATED) MIKHAIL LNU WHO WAS STUDENT OF PHYSICS AND MATH AT UNIVERSITY OF MOSCOW. HUSBAND DIED 1967 AS RESULT OF RADIATIONS RECEIVED IN EXPERIMENTS. SUBJECT WAS IN COLOGNE, WEST GERMANY, AT THAT TIME, WORKING AS AIDE AND INTERPRETER FOR SOVIET SCIENTIST OR LITERARY FIGURE. AFTER HUSBAND'S DEATH, SUBJECT WORKED AS INTERPRETER SEVERAL TIMES AT LEIPZIG FAIR. HAS ALSO BEEN IN EAST BERLIN.\n\n3. SUBJECT SAID SHE ACQUAINTED WITH UN TRANSLATOR RECENTLY\n\nSECRET CS COPY\n\n[Signature]\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 2472 SECRET\n\nARRESTED FOR ESPIONAGE (ALEXANDER V. TIKHOMIROV). MET HIM IN\nMOSCOW WHEN HE WAS STUDYING AT INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN RELATIONS. AT\nTHIS TIME SHE WORKING FOR MINISTRY OF FOREIGN TRADE, IN ADJACENT\nBUILDING. TIKHOMIROV HAD REPUTATION OF BEING ONE OF BEST\nTRANSLATORS OF HIS TIME.\n\n4. SUBJECT EARNED 2500 PESOS (APP. USD) PER MONTH PLUS\nSMALL QUANTITY RUBLES DEPOSITED IN MOSCOW. STATED SHE NEVER HAD\nOR HOLDS ON TO MONEY BECAUSE SHE ALWAYS LIKED TO BUY NICE THINGS.\n\n5. EVER SINCE ARRIVAL IN MEXICO SUBJECT HAS BEEN REPRIMANDED\nFOR HER TASTES WHICH WERE \"OUTSIDE EMBASSY WORK\", ABOVE ALL IN\nMORAL QUESTIONS, BUT ALSO FOR DYEING HER HAIR, WEARING PANTS,\nAND NOT BUYING SAME CLOTHES EMBASSY WIVES USUALLY BOUGHT. SHE\nHAD FOLLOWING \"MORAL\" PROBLEMS:\n\nA. SHE WAS MISTRESS OF FORMER HEAD OF CONSULAR SECTION\n(VALENTIN LOGINOV) WHO WAS SENT HOME WHEN THEIR RELATIONSHIP\nDISCOVERED. SHE HERSELF WAS PAROUSED EVEN THOUGH THEY\nFIRST SAID SHE WOULD RETURN WITH LOGINOV.\n\nB. ON 13 DECEMBER 69 SHE SNEAKED OFF TO CUERNAVACA WITH\nURGENA FOR WEEKEND. WHEN HER ABSENCE DISCOVERED ON 14\nDECEMBER SOVIETS LOOKED ALL OVER MEXICO CITY AND EVEN ASKED\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 2472 SECRET\n\nPOLICE TO HELP LOOK, WHEN SHE RETURNED SHE WAS THOROUGHLY INTERROGATED BUT DID NOT WANT TO REVEAL WITH WHOM SHE HAD GONE. ALEXANDR NIKITIN TOOK THE RAP, SAYING HE HAD BEEN WITH HER. FOR THIS REASON SHE WAS NOT PUNISHED BADLY, ALTHOUGH SHE WAS THREATENED WITH BEING SENT HOME. WHEN NIKITIN REALIZED THAT HE WAS GOING TO BE PUNISHED HE DENIED COMPLETELY THAT HE HAD BEEN WITH HER THAT WEEKEND.\n\n6. SUBJECT MET URUE\u00d1A ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO AT PARTY GIVEN BY HER FORMER CHIEF (VIKTOR IV\u00c1NOV, WHO SUBJECT DESCRIBED AS VERY NICE PERSON WHO LOVED TO GIVE PARTIES AND WHO HAD MANY MEXICAN CONTACTS). SAW URUE\u00d1A FREQUENTLY AS HE REPRESENTED MEXICAN FIRM DEALING WITH COMMERCIAL OFFICE (ECROC). ALL HER CONTACTS WITH MEXICAN FRIENDS WERE MADE THROUGH URUE\u00d1A. (SUBJECT STATED SHE MET MANY OTHER MEXICANS, WHOSE NAMES SHE DOES NOT RECALL, IN HER FREQUENT VISITS TO MUSEUMS, THEATERS, AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES. SOMETIMES THESE MEXICANS WOULD PICK HER UP AND BRING HER HOME, ALTHOUGH SHE NEVER TOLD THEM HER NAME OR OCCUPATION.) THROUGH URUE\u00d1A SUBJECT MET GROUP OF FREE-SPENDING YOUTHS, MANY OF SPANISH BACKGROUND (AS IS URUE\u00d1A), AND SHE ENJOYED GOING OUT WITH THEM. SHE SAID SHE HAD ALWAYS BEEN FREE SPIRIT WHO DID NOT LIKE THE\n\nSECRET\nRESTRICTIONS CUSTOMARY IN HER COUNTRY AND, THEREFORE, SHE WOULD OFTEN GO TO THE MOVIES BEHIND THE BACKS OF HER EMBASSY AND HER CHIEFS. IT WAS IN THIS WAY SHE BEGAN TO GO OUT WITH URUENA AND HIS GROUP. SHE SAID THAT HER CHARACTER HAD ALWAYS BEEN A LITTLE ADVENTUROUS AND AT TIMES CAUSED HER PROBLEMS. LITEKPO-14 COMMENTED THAT FROM HER CONVERSATION IT CLEAR SHE IS GIRL OF \"NOT VERY STRICT MORAL CONDUCT.\" ON THE CONTRARY, SHE IS WOMAN WHO ENJOYS CONTACT WITH MALES VERY MUCH.\n\n7. SUBJECT DECIDED STAY IN MEXICO WHEN SHE LEARNED SHE TO BE SENT HOME 8 FEBRUARY (ORIGINAL DATE WAS 4 FEBRUARY). LEARNED THIS FROM MALE COLLEAGUE (THUS FAR UNIDENTIFIED) WHO WAS DRUNK. DOES NOT KNOW IF COLLEAGUE TOLD HER OUT OF KINDNESS OR DRUNKENNESS. SHE IN TURN TOLD URUENA WHO SAID HE WOULD FIND HELP, SAID HE COULD NOT HELP PERSONALLY BUT WOULD GIVE HER KEYS TO HIS APARTMENT.\n\nON 6 FEBRUARY SHE SUSPECTED PROVOCATION WHEN, AS SHE ENTERED LOCAL PHARMACY, TWO WOMEN APPROACHED HER PROPOSING THAT SHE REMAIN IN MEXICO. NOT KNOWING HOW THESE WOMEN COULD KNOW THAT SHE WAS RETURNING, SHE SUSPECTED THAT THE WOMEN HAD BEEN SENT BY HER EMBASSY, PARTICULARLY SINCE SHE HAD JUST SEEN FIRST SECRETARY \"BORIS\" (PROBABLY KOLCHYAKOV, POSSIBLY CHMYKOV). BORIS HAD\nPAGE 5 MEXICO CITY 247C SECRET\n\nALWAYS GREETED HER AFFECTIONATELY BUT THIS TIME, ON SEEING HER, HE IGNORED HER. ON 7 FEBRUARY SHE AGAIN ASKED URUENA FOR HELP, SAYING IF HE DID NOT THERE WAS NO WAY OUT--EITHER SHE RETURNED TO SOVIET UNION AND SUFFERED CONSEQUENCES, OR SHE COMMITTED SUICIDE IN MEXICO. URUENA THEN INTRODUCED HER TO ONE RICARDO FIERRO, WHO HID HER FOR TWO DAYS. (STATION COMMENT: THIS VERSION OF SEQUENCE OF EVENTS APPEARS SOMEWHAT GARbled. ADDITIONAL DETAIL RE ACTUAL ESCAPE CAME IN CONVERSATION WITH FLUTED WHEN SUBJECT SAID SHE HAD RECEIVED PERMISSION TO GO TO FAREWELL PARTY 7 FEBRUARY. PARTY WAS IN APARTMENT IN WHICH SHE TOOK REFUGE.)\n\n8. SINCE DEFECTION SUBJECT HAS BEEN TRYING TO FIND URUENA, WHO WAS DUE TO RETURN FROM MONTERREY, WHERE HE HAD GONE ON 6 FEBRUARY. RICARDO FIERRO HAS BEEN GO-BETWEEN, AND HE REPORTED ON 11 FEBRUARY, THAT \"DUE TO THE SITUATION\" URUENA COULD NOT MOVE.\n\n9. URUENA'S SISTER KARI, WHO WORKS FOR MAGAZINE \"GENTE,\" CALLED SUBJECT WHEN SHE LEARNED OF BOMB EXPLOSION ACROSS STREET FROM COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CASE WHICH RESULTED IN FIRST REMOVAL OF LITENPO-12 PER PARA 1 MEXICO CITY 2444). KARI KNEW THAT MAN WHO HAD BEEN KILLED WAS CLOSE FRIEND OF MEXICAN MISSION CHAUFFEUR DANIEL HOMIEL (WHO HAS WORKED FOR MISSION FOR 15 YEARS). SECRET\n\nSECRET\nPAGE 6 MEXICO CITY 2472 SECRET\n\n10. CONFRONTATION OF SUBJECT IN GOVERNACION WAS ATTENDED\nBY OLEG NICHIPORENKO, CHARGE BOHIS KAZANTSEV, AND ONE OTHER SOVIET\nIDENTITY NOT CLEAR. SUBJECT STATED ALL THREE SPOKE TO HER\nNICELY, SAYING THAT IF SHE NEEDED ANYTHING SUCH AS MONEY OR CLOTHING,\nTHEY WOULD SEND IT TO HER. THEY WERE HER FRIENDS AND WERE ONLY\nTRYING TO HELP HER. BUT AT END OF INTERVIEW WHEN SHE SAID THAT\nSHE WAS REMAINING IN MEXICO AND IT WAS BETTER THAT THEY FORGOT\nABOUT HER, KAZANTSEV TOLD HER THAT \"THE LONGER SHE STAYED THE WORSE\nIT WOULD BE FOR HER WHEN SHE RETURNED.\"\n\n11. FILE: 201-635670.\nSECRET\nREFERENCE: A. HUMA 37833, 12 September 1969\nB. TELA 37226, 10 October 1969\n\n1. The two Personality Assessment Questionnaires on AEDIKHARD which were transmitted as separate cover attachments to Reference A were unfortunately not received until 30 September, by which date we knew from a visa cable sent the State Department by the Embassy in Mexico City that AEDIKHARD was departing PCS one week thereafter, on 7 October. Reference B confirmed that departure.\n\n2. Since but one week was available for the completion of the MECHUSH assessment, and its transmittal to the Station, we decided not to go ahead with it. The PAQ's have been made a part of AEDIKHARD's file, and should he appear in the future outside the USSR, an assessment can be made at that time.\n\nNorma W. LETCHWORTH\n\nDistribution:\n3-C03, Mexico City\nReference: DIRECTOR 27830, 7 August 1969\n\n1. LIFIRE reported the PCS arrival in Mexico City of the HAZURIN family on 30 October 1969 aboard Air France flight 707 from New York City. Subject travelled on Soviet Diplomatic Passport D-027105 and his wife, Lidiya Petruna, and son, Andrey, travelled on Soviet Diplomatic Passport D-027106.\n\n2. Per Reference cable, Subject was scheduled to replace Valentin Sergeyevich LOGINOY (201-285412). Subject will be replacing LOGINOY in slot but apparently not in position. Oleg Makinovich NECHIPORENKO (201-305870) was introduced at LOGINOY's farewell reception at the Soviet Embassy as LOGINOY's successor as \"Head of the Consular Section.\" Since we do not have passport coverage on Air France flights, we were unable to obtain Subject's passport, which would indicate his title.\n\n3. Subject was escorted into the Soviet Embassy on his first day in Mexico by NECHIPORENKO.\n\n4. Photographs and further information on Subject will be forwarded when received.\n\n5. A 201 number for Subject is requested.\n\nfor/John A. PROBST\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/SH\n1 - C/WH\nCS COPY FILED IN 50-8-10\n\nDATE\n30 October 1969\n\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\n\nDISPATCH NUMBER\nHMA-38043\n\nDISPATCH STATION AND NUMBER\n\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\n\nMARKED FOR DESTRUCTION\nNO DESTRUCTION REQUIRED\nONLY QUALIFIED DEER CAN READ DESTRUCTION\n\nACTION REQUIRED\nDIRECTOR 27830, 7 August 1969\n\nCLASSIFICATION\nSECRET\n\nMARKED FOR DESTRUCTION\nNO DESTRUCTION REQUIRED\nONLY QUALIFIED DEER CAN READ DESTRUCTION\n\nACTION REQUIRED\nDIRECTOR 27830, 7 August 1969\n| TO | ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n|----|----------|---------------|--------------------|\n| 1. | C1/LS 2-C-35 | 31 OCT 1969 |                    |\n| 2. |          |               |                    |\n| 3. | GB/100   |               |                    |\n| 4. |          |               |                    |\n| 5. |          |               |                    |\n| 6. |          |               |                    |\n| 7. |          |               |                    |\n| 8. |          |               |                    |\n| 9. | GB/20    | NOV 5 DEC 1969 |                    |\n| 10.|          |               |                    |\n| 11.|          |               |                    |\n| 12.|          |               |                    |\n| 13.|          |               |                    |\n| 14.|          |               |                    |\n| 15.|          |               |                    |\n| 16.|          |               |                    |\n| 17.|          |               |                    |\n\n**FROM:** RID 20\n\n**TO:** ALL ADDRESSEES\n\n**PROPERTY FILE NO.:**\n\n**FILL IN SECTION 1 ON BACK, IF APPROPRIATE**\n\n**COMMENTS:**\n\n**SECRET**\n\n(WHEN FILLED IN)\n\n**ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET**\n\n**INSTRUCTIONS:**\n\n1. Fill in Sect. 2 on back. Detach back flap and forward to RID.\n2. Destroy front cover sheet, unless it records significant action taken or comments requiring preservation.\n\n**TO: ACTION BRANCH:**\n\nIf file no. and title shown are not proper, insert proper file no. below and forward document to RID: AN.\nDATE: 17 OCTOBER 1969\nCLASSIFICATION: NONE GIVEN\nSUBJECT: LOGINOV, VALENTIN S.\nLOGINOV, DMITRY V.\nLOGINOVA, ALEXANDRA T.\nSECRET\n\nTO\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nREDLEG AEDIEHARD AEKICK\n\nREF: A) MEXICO CITY-1638 (IN 62539)*\n\nB) DIRECTOR-14106, 21 JUNE 69**\n\n1. SUBJECT OF REF ASSIGNED 201-853538. Jimmy Sobor.\n\n2. REF B ADVISED NO RECORD SUBJECT. RETRACES UNDE.\n\nNAME VARIATION IN PRQ NEGATIVE. COVERT NAME CHECKS WITH\nNATIONAL AGENCIES PENDING.\n\n3. STATION IS REQUESTED TO CONTINUE PROCESSING CASE\nUNDER CSI-F-10-5, PARA 19. PRIMARY EMPHASIS SHOULD BE ON\nSUBJECT'S RELATIONSHIP WITH AEDIEHARD (201-285412) WHO HAS\nBEEN CULTIVATING SUBJECT SINCE FEBRUARY 69. SUBJECT EVIDENTLY\nATTRACTIVE TO AEKICK ON BASIS WIDE RANGE OF CONTACTS AMONG\nPROMINENT MEXICANS.\n\nFILE: 201-853538; 201-285412.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n301 2854/2\nWH Comment: *Request Headquarters and National Agencies traces.\n\n**Forwarded early Headquarters traces.\nSTATE DEPT TELEGRAM\nMEXICO 5364\nDATE: 1 OCTOBER 1969\nCLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED\nSUBJECT: VISAS HOUSE VALENTIN LOGUINOV...\n1. Subject, accompanied by his wife, Aleksandra Dmitriyevna, and son, Dmitriy, departed Mexico City PCS on 7 October 1969. They travelled to New York via Air France Flight 700. From New York they would fly Aeroflot to Moscow.\n\n2. Subject and his wife were honored by several going-away parties, one of which was given on 1 October at the Soviet Embassy.\n\n3. Subject stated several times before he left that he hoped that he would return to Mexico and said that there was a good chance he would come back.\n\n4. Subject introduced Oleg Maksimovich NECHIPORENKO (201-305870) as his replacement as Chief of the Consular Office of the Soviet Embassy. Subject replaced NECHIPORENKO as Vice-Consul when he arrived PCS in August 1965.\n\n5. We do not have any information as yet as to the arrival of Anatoliy Sergeyevich KAZURIN (201- ), who according to DIRECTOR 27650, 7 August 1969, is scheduled to replace LOGINOV.\n\n6. Forwarded herewith is transit visa information as well as copies of the passports used by Subject and his wife.\n\nAttachment:\nPassport and visa h/w\n\nDistribution:\n(2) C/SB w/att h/w\n(1) C/WH w/o att\n\nCS COPY\n\nMICROFILMED\nOCT 23 1969\nDOC. MICRO. SER.\nLa Embajada de la Uni\u00f3n de Rep\u00fablicas Socialistas Sovi\u00e9ticas saluda muy atentamente a la Embajada de los Estados Unidos de Am\u00e9rica y tiene el honor de solicitar que se sirva extender las visas de tr\u00e1nsito en los pasaportes diplom\u00e1ticos del Sr. VALENTIN LOGUINOV, Tercer Secretario de la Embajada de la URSS en M\u00e9xico, su esposa Sra. ALEXANDRA LOGUINOVA, con el hijo DMITRI.\n\nLas personas mencionadas salen de M\u00e9xico a Nueva York el d\u00eda 7 de octubre de 1969 por la C\u00eda \"Air France\" y van a continuar su viaje rumbo a Mosc\u00fa el d\u00eda 10 de octubre por la C\u00eda \"Aeroflot\".\n\nLa Embajada de la URSS agradece de antemano la atenci\u00f3n que la Embajada de los Estados Unidos de Am\u00e9rica tenga a bien de prestar a esta solicitud y aprovecha la oportunidad para reiterar las seguridades de su m\u00e1s alta y distinguida consideraci\u00f3n.\n\nM\u00e9xico, D.F. 30 de septiembre de 1969.\n\nA LA EMBAJADA DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AM\u00c9RICA\n| APELLIDO | NOMBRE | SEGUNDO NOMBRE | DOCUMENTO DE IDENTIDAD |\n|----------|--------|----------------|------------------------|\n| LECUINOV | VALENTIN |                |                        |\n\n| RESIDENCIA | Ignacio Esteva 21-2 |\n\n| FECHA Y LUGAR DE NACIMIENTO | DIA | MES | A\u00d1O |\n|-----------------------------|-----|-----|-----|\n| Moscu                      | 23  | 12  | 1929 |\n\n| SEXO | PROFESION | NACIONALIDAD | FECHA DE NACIMIENTO |\n|------|-----------|--------------|---------------------|\n| M    | Diplomado | Rusia        | 7-5-1940            |\n\nNotas:\n- Se ha firmado por la persona en la que se indica.\n- Se ha firmado por la persona en la que se indica.\n- Se ha firmado por la persona en la que se indica.\n\nFirma del autorizado: [Firma]\n\nFecha de firma: [Fecha]\n| APELLIDO | NOMBRE | SEGUNDO NOMBRE | DOCUMENTO DE IDENTIDAD |\n|----------|--------|----------------|------------------------|\n| LOPEZ   | TALENTO | P. | DIP. |\n\n| RESIDENCIA | DIA | MES | A\u00d1O | F\u00c9 | FECHA Y LUGAR DE NACIMIENTO |\n|------------|-----|-----|-----|----|-----------------------------|\n| G. E.      | 03  | 12  | 1932|    |                             |\n\n| G\u00c9NERO | OJOS | ESTATURA | NACIONALIDAD | SEXO | PROFESI\u00d3N | INGRESO Y PROPOSITO DE ESTAICA EN LAS F.E. |\n|--------|------|----------|--------------|------|-----------|------------------------------------------|\n| M.     |      |          |              |      |           |                                          |\n\nFirma del autorizado:\n\n[Signature]\n\nFirma del autorizado por la Direcci\u00f3n General de las F.E.\n\n[Signature]\n\nFecha: 25/07/1940\n\n[Signature]\nUNION\nDES R\u00c9PUBLIQUES\nSOVI\u00c9TIQUES SOCIALISTES\nPASSEPORT\nDIPLOMATIQUE\n\n\u0414 \u2116 010264\n\n\u0421\u041e\u042e\u0417 \u0421\u041e\u0412\u0415\u0422\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425\n\u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425\n\u0420\u0415\u0421\u041f\u0423\u0411\u041b\u0418\u041a\n\u0414\u0418\u041f\u041b\u041e\u041c\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0419\n\n\u0414 \u2116 010264\n\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u044a\u044f\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043e, \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043d \u0421\u041e\u042e\u0417\u0410 \u0421\u041e\u0412\u0415\u0422\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0420\u0415\u0421\u041f\u0423\u0411\u041b\u0418\u041a\n\n\u041b\u041e\u0413\u0418\u041d\u041e\u0412 \u0412\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043d \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0435\u0435\u0432\u0438\u0447,\n\n\u0422\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0439 \u0441\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0430\u0440\u044c \u041f\u043e\u0441\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0432 \u041c\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0438\u043a\u0435,\n\n\u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0443\n\n\u0418\u041c\u0415\u041d\u0415\u041c \u0421\u041e\u042e\u0417\u0410 \u0421\u041e\u0412\u0415\u0422\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0420\u0415\u0421\u041f\u0423\u0411\u041b\u0418\u041a\n\n\u041c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0418\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0414\u0435\u043b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442 \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0438 \u0414\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0413\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0443\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0435\u043f\u044f\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0446\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u0449\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u043e\u043a\u0430\u0437\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0435\u043c\u0443 \u0432\u0441\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435.\n\n\u041f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d \u043d\u0430 \u041f\u042f\u0422\u042c \u041b\u0415\u0422\n\n24 \u0438\u044e\u043d\u044f 1935 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430\n\n\u0417\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u041c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430 \u0418\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0414\u0435\u043b \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\nLe titulaire du pr\u00e9sent, citoyen de l'Union des R\u00e9publiques Sovi\u00e9tiques Socialistes\n\nValentin LOGUNOV,\n\nTresi\u00e8me Secr\u00e9taire de l'Ambassade de l'URSS\n\nau Mexique,\n\nse rend \u00e0 l'\u00e9tranger\n\nAU NOM DE L'UNION DES R\u00c9PUBLIQUES SOVI\u00c9TIQUES SOCIALISTES\n\nLe Minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00c9trang\u00e8res pr\u00eate toutes les autorit\u00e9s civiles et militaires de l'URSS et des Pays Amis de laisser passer librement le titulaire du pr\u00e9sent passeport et de lui accorder aide et protection en cas de besoin.\n\nCe passeport est valable pour cinq ans\n\n24 juin 1956\n\nLe Suppl\u00e9ant du Ministre des Affaires \u00c9trang\u00e8res de l'URSS\n\nPour traduction conforme\n\u041e\u0442\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043a\u0430 \u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430. \u0420\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0443\u0438\u0440\u0443\u0435\u043c.\n\u0421\u0440\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u0449\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\n\u043f\u043e \" \" 19 \u0433.\nLe d\u00e9lai du pr\u00e9sent passeport est prolong\u00e9\njusqu'au \" \" 19 \u0433.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u0449\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\n\u043f\u043e \" \" 19 \u0433.\nLe d\u00e9lai du pr\u00e9sent passeport est prolong\u00e9\njusqu'au \" \" 19 \u0433.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u0449\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\n\u043f\u043e \" \" 19 \u0433.\nLe d\u00e9lai du pr\u00e9sent passeport est prolong\u00e9\njusqu'au \" \" 19 \u0433.\n\n\u0414\u0438\u043f\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\n\u0414\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\n\n\u0422.\n\u0414\u0438\u043f\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\n\n\u0414\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\n\u041c\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0432\u0430 46\n\n\u0414\u0438\u043f\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\n\n\u0414\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\n\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\n\n\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\n\nEMBAJADA DE MEXICO en la\nU.R.S.S.\nVISA DIPLOMATICA No. 136\nVALIDA por\n\nDobr\u00e1 utilizarse antes\ndel d\u00eda:\n\nMosc\u00fa, 19-12-1975\n\n\u041f\u043e\u0434\u043f\u0438\u0441\u044c\nESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS\n\nSECRETARIA DE RELACIONES EXTERIORES\n\nDIRECCION GENERAL DEL CENSO NACIONAL\n\nVISA N\u00b0 304\n\nSE AGRADA AL HOMBRE DE ESTE PASEANTE\n\nSr. Valent\u00edn Lagunero\n\nSecretario de la\n\nEmbajada de la ORU\n\nPara leer y firmar a la fecha de\n\nREPUBLICA\n\nMEXICO, D.F., 26 DE JULIO DE 1917\n\nSECRETARIA DE\n\nRELACIONES EXTERIORES\n\nN\u00b0 01034\n\nCERTEZ DE SU EXCELENCIA\n| APELLIDO | NOMBRE | SEGUNDO NOMBRE | DOCUMENTO DE IDENTIDAD |\n|----------|--------|----------------|------------------------|\n| Logro\u00f1o | Alejandro | | pas dep. |\n\n| RESIDENCIA | FECHA LUGAR DE NACIMIENTO | D\u00cdA | MES | A\u00d1O |\n|------------|--------------------------|-----|-----|-----|\n| Ignacio Esteban | Moscu | 20 | 8 | 28 |\n\n| SE\u00d1AS | PROFESI\u00d3N | DIRECCI\u00d3N Y PROPIEDAD DE ESTANCIA EN LOS EE.UU. |\n|-------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------|\n|       |           |                                               |\n\nHOGAR: Tr\u00e1nsito 710-910\n\nEstimado que la persona de que se trata se encuentra al servicio de la naci\u00f3n en los EE.UU. y que el presente documento se encuentra en su poder.\n\nCertifico que la informaci\u00f3n que figura en la presente solicitud, incluyendo las declaraciones que forman parte de la misma, es cierta y completa.\n\nEl informante fue entrevistado por m\u00ed y se solicit\u00f3 que firmara en su presencia.\n\n(Firma del solicitante)\n\nSembrado para la Direcci\u00f3n General de la DIA\n\nR\u00fabrica: 15-257 (DIA)\n\nFecha: 12-25-74\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\n\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0435\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420, \u0433\u0435\u043d\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043b-\u043b\u0435\u0439\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0430\u043d\u0442\n\u0421\u041e\u042e\u0417\u0410 \u0421\u041e\u0412\u0415\u0422\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425\n\u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0420\u0415\u0421\u041f\u0423\u0411\u041b\u0418\u041a\n\n\u041b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u0430 \u0413\u0440\u0438\u0433\u043e\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0432\u043d\u0430,\n\n\u0441\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0430\u0440\u044c \u0413\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\u0432 \u041d\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0431\u0438\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0435.\n\n\u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0437\u0430 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0443 \u0441 26 \u0438\u044e\u043d\u044f 1939 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430.\n\n\u0418\u041c\u0415\u041d\u0415\u041c \u0421\u041e\u042e\u0417\u0410\n\u0421\u041e\u0412\u0415\u0422\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0418\u0425 \u0420\u0415\u0421\u041f\u0423\u0411\u041b\u0418\u041a\n\n\u041c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0418\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0414\u0435\u043b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442 \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0433\u0440\u0430\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u0432\u043e\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435\n\u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0438 \u0414\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0413\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0443\u0441\u043a\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0435\u043f\u044f\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\n\u0432\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0446\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u0449\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0430 \u0438 \u043e\u043a\u0430\u0437\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0435\u043c\u0443 \u0432\u0441\u044f\u043a\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435.\n\n\u041f\u0430\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d \u043d\u0430 26 \u0438\u044e\u043d\u044f 1939 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430.\n\n26 \u0438\u044e\u043d\u044f 1939 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430.\n\n\u0417\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u041c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\n\u0418\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0414\u0435\u043b \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420.\nLe titulaire du pr\u00e9sent, citoyen de l'Union des R\u00e9publiques Sovi\u00e9tiques Socialistes\n\nAlexandra LOBNOVA,\n\n\u00e9pouse du Troisi\u00e8me Secr\u00e9taire de l'ambassade de l'URSS au Mexique,\n\nse rend \u00e0 l'\u00e9tranger avec son fils Dmitri, n\u00e9 en 1959\n\nAu nom de l'Union des R\u00e9publiques Sovi\u00e9tiques Socialistes\n\nLe Minist\u00e8re des Affaires \u00c9trang\u00e8res pr\u00e9te toutes les autorit\u00e9s civiles et militaires de l'URSS et des Pays Amis de laisser passer librement le titulaire du pr\u00e9sent passeport et de lui accorder aide et protection en cas de besoin.\n\nCe passeport est valable pour\n\n24 ans\n\nMoscou, le 24 Juin 1965\n\nLe Secr\u00e9taire du Ministre des Affaires \u00c9trang\u00e8res de l'URSS\n\nPour traduction conforme\n\u0414\u0438\u043f\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\n\n\u0414\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\n\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\n\n- 7 -\n\u0414\u0438\u043f\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0432\u0438\u0437\u0430\n\n\u0414\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0432\u044b\u0435\u0437\u0434\u0430 \u0438\u0437 \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420\n\u0434\u043e 1965 \u0433.\n\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0442\n\n\u041c\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0432\u0430, 6 \u0438\u044e\u043b\u044f 1965 \u0433.\n\n\u0412\u0438\u0437\u0430 \"Visa\"\n\nEMBAJADA DE MEXICO en la\nU.R.S.S.\nVISA DIPLOMATICA No. 137\nVALIDA por 30 d\u00edas\nDeber\u00e1 utilizarse antes\ndel d\u00eda:\n\nMosc\u00fa, JUL. 6, 1965\n\n[Signature]\nESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS\n\nSECRETARIA DE RELACIONES EXTERIORES\n\nEMISI\u00d3N GENERAL DEL CEREMONIAL\n\nVISA N\u00daMERO 905\n\nSE AUTORIZA AL INTEGRANTE DE ESTE PASAPORTE\n\nDon Alejandro Lagunero\n\ny a sus hijos menores, esposo,\n\ndel Secretario de la Embajada de la Uni\u00f3n Sovi\u00e9tica,\n\npara salir y entrar a la Rep\u00fablica Mexicana\n\nHACIA EL 15 DE OCTUBRE DE 1967\n\nM\u00c9XICO, D. F., 13 JULIO 1967\n\nSECRETARIA DE RELACIONES EXTERIORES\n\nEMISI\u00d3N GENERAL DEL CEREMONIAL\n\nVISA N\u00daMERO 905\nSECRET 092388Z OCT 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 1638\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREDLEG AEDIEMARD AEKICK (5V91241)\n\nREFS: A. MEXICO CITY 0810, 27 JUNE 1969\n\nB. HMAA 37513, 14 JULY 1969\n\nC. HMAA 37846, 22 SEPTEMBER 1969\n\n1. REFS PROVIDED FULL BIO DATA AND REQUESTED TRACES JIMMY SABORI.\n\nTO DATE NO REPLY RECEIVED.\n\n2. REQUEST RESULTS RVROCK AND LNHARP AGENCY TRACES ASAP.\n\n3. FILE: 201- SABORI.\n\nSECRET\n\f\n**DISPATCH**\n\n| CLASSIFICATION | PROCESSING ACTION |\n|----------------|-------------------|\n| SECRET         | MARKED FOR DESTRUCTION |\n| XX             | NO INDEXING REQUIRED |\n|                | ONLY QUALIFIED DESK |\n|                | CAN JUDGE INDEXING |\n|                | MICROFILM |\n\n**Chief, SB Division**\n\n**Chief, WH Division**\n\n**Chief of Station, Mexico City**\n\n**SUBJECT**\n\nREDTOP AEKICK AEDIEHARD\nTransmittal of PAQ\n\n**ACTION REQUIRED**\n\nREFERENCES\n\nAction Required: For review by MKCRUSH\n\nTransmitted herewith are two Personality Assessment Questionnaires completed by LIBACON-1 and IDENTITY on AEDIEHARD. The Station would welcome any comments or assessment MKCRUSH might make on the basis of these reports. The Station is not retaining copies of these PAQs.\n\nJohn A. Arezmendi\n\nFor/John A. PROBERT\n\nAttachment:\n1. IDENTITY u/a/c\n2. PAQ h/w\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/SB w/att h/w and u/a/c\n1 - C/WH w/att #1 u/a/c; w/o att #2\n\nS/C ATT'D BY 21/11\nDated 24 SEP 69\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\n\n| DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER | DATE |\n|----------------------------|------|\n| HVM-37833                  | 12 September 1969 |\n\nSECRET\n\n2:1-285412\nLIBACON-1 Progress Report\n\n1. Forwarded herewith is Bruce H. FERMAID's progress report on LIBACON-1, covering the period 30 January to 15 August 1969.\n\n2. As FERMAID's report indicates, steady progress has been made in developing LIBACON-1 into a responsive agent. LIBACON-1's credentials vis-a-vis the Soviets are excellent, and he is learning to use these credentials to the Station's benefit. He was reluctant at first, possibly because he did not want to do the same thing for RVROCK that he refused to do for AEXKIE. Patient handling by FERMAID seems to have overcome this reluctance, and LIBACON-1 now responds well to direction.\n\n3. So far, there seems to be no reason to suspect the sincerity of LIBACON-1's relationship with RVROCK. He developed strong personal affection and professional respect for both KARTASUX and FERMAID, and his turnover to Douglas F. DITMANSON on 16 August 1969 represents an effort to strengthen the emotional attachment, which seems to be so important to him, by providing him with a case officer who speaks his native tongue. And, although LIBACON-1's private life is a mess, we will watch closely to see that this does not cause any greater problem than occasional missed meetings and delays in completing assignments.\n\n4. In the next phase of LIBACON-1's activity, we expect to concentrate on two things:\n\n   a. Strengthening the ties with AEDINHARD (there have been indications that AEDINHARD's tour may not be ending shortly after all, in which case he will remain a prime Station target).\n\n   b. Spotting additional agent prospects, as suggested by Reference A.\n\nAttachment\nProgress Report h/w\nIDAMS u/s/c\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/WH w/att h/w and u/s/c\n1 - C/EN w/att h/w and u/s/c\n\nfor/Horace E. PRALLETT\nPROGRESS REPORT\n\nSubject: LIBACON-1\n\nPeriod Covered: January 30 to August 14, 1969\n\n1. LIBACON-1 was recruited by Samuel J. KARTASUK on January 30 and was handled by him until March 26. During this period they held nine ops meetings.\n\n2. Bruce H. FERNALD took over LIBACON-1 on March 26 and handled him to August 14, when he turned him over to Douglas F. DITMANSON. During this period 16 ops meetings were held.\n\n3. After a fine recruitment job KARTASUK also accomplished the difficult task of converting LIBACON-1's agreement to work for KARTASUK personally into a regular working arrangement.\n\n4. Of the nine meetings KARTASUK held with LIBACON-1, actually only six were working meetings. Info was obtained on LIBACON-1's personal background as well as his ops potential. LIBACON-1 was SGSWIRLED with satisfactory results. Further, LIBACON-1 was motivated to work for us and he was mentally prepared to accept another handler. During this period the condition which LIBACON-1 had placed on his agreement to work for us was respected (i.e., that he would not be asked to report on his personal friends such as Standards, his students, or Mexicans to whom he was emotionally attached). LIBACON-1 did complete for KARTASUK a 15-line written report on AEDIEHARD.\n\n5. FERNALD encountered no problems in getting along with and handling LIBACON-1, whom he got accustomed to following instructions and to submitting reports in writing.\n\n6. LIBACON-1's initial attitude was that he had agreed to work, or more accurately, to assist us in our work against AEKICK, but he was determined to keep himself away from everybody and everything associated with AEKICK. He did not see AEDIEHARD for more than four months, and when they met accidentally in a resort, LIBACON-1 was decisively turning down everything AEDIEHARD asked for. He went so far as to accept a luncheon appointment with AEDIEHARD, and then a day before it was to take place he postponed it indefinitely.\n\nSECRET\n7. FERNALD succeeded in convincing LIBACON-1 that he should maintain social or friendly personal contact with AEDIEHARD and his colleagues and that he could do it without either giving in to his or their demands, or at the other extreme, without saying no to everything they mention or ask for. LIBACON-1 followed instructions and went to AEDIEHARD's office to ask him why he had not called him for ten weeks. The result was that LIBACON-1 had two luncheon meetings with AEDIEHARD in July, and on August 8 LIBACON-1 and his wife were dinner guests of AEDIEHARD and his wife at their apartment. The AEDIEHARDS agreed to come to LIBACON-1's place for a farewell dinner in September and in the meanwhile LIBACON-1 and AEDIEHARD will meet for a luncheon on August 29.\n\n8. FERNALD insisted from the beginning of his handling of LIBACON-1 that the latter prepare bio sketches on the MIHARSHORS he knew personally and on Spaniards who had lived in the USSR. LIBACON-1 prepared bio sketches, which are actually personality assessments, on AEDIEHARD, IDENTITY A, IDENTITY B, IDENTITY C, and IDENTITY D. The latter two reports showed that he would also report on two Spaniards who are close friends of his, in spite of his earlier conditions. Further, FERNALD instructed LIBACON-1 to contact a good friend of his (IDENTITY E) when the latter returned from a longer trip to Czechoslovakia. LIBACON-1 carried out the assignment well and reported (orally) about IDENTITY E's observations, impressions, and conclusions concerning what he saw and heard during his stay in his country. IDENTITY E is also a good personal friend of LIBACON-1.\n\n9. From the above it can be seen that LIBACON-1 has developed into a person who has confidence in us, and he accepts without reservation that we know what we are doing.\n\n10. In analyzing LIBACON-1's written reports it can easily be seen that LIBACON-1 takes his assignments seriously and when he makes a statement about a person he is scrupulous about drawing only that conclusion which can be corroborated with facts. LIBACON-1 is equally serious and reliable when he reports about his meetings with AEDIEHARD. He first reports the course of the meeting and reports AEDIEHARD's statements verbatim, as much as possible. Then, he uses his area knowledge and the knowledge of the person to relay the actual meaning of the statements. FERNALD not only believes that LIBACON-1's reporting is reliable, but he also feels that one can depend on LIBACON-1 to use his knowledge of the area and people to separate the appearance and verbiage from the facts, be they good or bad.\n\n11. An assessment of the moral and political reliability of LIBACON-1, from the point of view of his work and activity on our behalf, can only be favorable. The same cannot be said when one views his personal life. In this field he has many problems, which, generally speaking, are a result of the fact that while he is intellectually mature (or at least adequately mature for his age),\nWhen it comes to emotions he acts like a toon-ager. LIBACON-1 is aware of this fact and he ascribes it to the fact that he grew under conditions of regimentation and moral terror; and when he found himself in a world in which people live free and there are no restrictions on personal activities, as long as they do not violate the laws of the country, he remained possessed by the desire to enjoy this freedom. Fortunately, his personal immaturity affects his work for us only to the extent that he occasionally may not complete an assessment; but when he does do a job he does it very well.\n\n12. To conclude: Although LIBACON-1 has his problems, there are restricted to the area which does not affect his reliability, dependability and loyalty to us and our cause. It is felt that LIBACON-1 will be still more productive and easier developed when handled by a case officer speaking Russian; i.e., the language of his formative years.\n\nBruce H. FERNALD\nSECRET\n\nu/s/c Attachment to HMA-37762, 27 August 1969\n\nIDENTITIES\n\nIDENTITY A - Vasil CHICHKOV (201-207254)\nIDENTITY B - Aleksandr BROVKIN (201-185114)\nIDENTITY C - Ricardo CASTELLOTE\nIDENTITY D - Carmen CASTELLOTE de WOLNY\nIDENTITY E - Karel WENDEL (201-267892)\n**SECRET**\n\n**DOCUMENT TRANSFER AND CROSS REFERENCE**\n\n| SUBJECT OF DOCUMENT | DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|\n|                     |                         |\n\n| FILE NO. | DISPATCH OR SOURCE DOC. SYMBOL NO. | DATE |\n|----------|-----------------------------------|------|\n|          |                                   |      |\n\n| SOURCE CRYPTOGRAM | DATE OF INFO | EVALUATION |\n|-------------------|--------------|------------|\n|                   |              |            |\n\n| ANALYST | DATE PROCEEDED | DISSEMINATED IN | DATE |\n|---------|----------------|-----------------|------|\n|         |                |                 |      |\n\n**DOCUMENT DISPOSITION**\n\n| CROSS REFERRED TO THIS FILE | TRANSFERRED TO RE FILE NO. |\n|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n|                             |                             |\n\n**PERTINENT INFORMATION**\n\nLOGINOV, VALENTIN SERGEYEVICH\n201-2H5412\nSEX M (008)\nCIT ?\nNCC ?\nVOICE SAMPLE ATTACHED.\n\n040-008-010\nIMMA-17724\n20 AUG 69\nP2\n\nR 6909030717\n\nFILE IN 201-285412\n\nFILE THIS FORM IN FILE NO.\nSECRET\n\n07 17 02 AUG 69\n\nCITE DIRECTOR\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nREDTOP AENICK\n\n1. ACCORDING TO SENSITIVE HEADQUARTERS SOURCE, MEXICAN DIPLOMATIC VISAS REQUESTED FOR ANATOLI MAZURIN, WIFE AND SON. MAZURIN SCHEDULED TO REPLACE LOGINOV.\n\n2. VISA REQUEST SUBMITTED U.S. EMBASSY MOSCOW PROVIDES FURTHER BIO DETAILS AS FOLLOWS: ANATOLIY SERGEYEVICH MAZURIN, DPOB 25 SEPTEMBER 1938 AT ANNENKA; WIFE, LIDIYA PETROVNA, DPOB 17 MARCH 1941 AT MOSCOW; SON, ANDREY ANATOLYEVICH, DPOB 31 DECEMBER 1963 AT MOSCOW.\n\n3. NO HEADQUARTERS TRACES MAZURIN OR FAMILY.\n\n4. FILE 201-285412 AND 201-\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nAC/SB/X/WH\n\nSB/CI/O\n\nWH/1\n\nWILLIAM V. BROE\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICERS\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 242346Z JUN 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 0763\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\nEDTOP AEXICK\n\nREF MEXICO CITY 0713 [2U 86362]\n\n1. FERNALD MET SUBJECT REF 23 JUNE. SUBJECT EXPLAINED HE HAD FIRST MET AEDIEHARD IN FEB 69 AT PARTY AT HOME OF LOCAL COMMUNIST DR. FEDERICO MARIN (STATION TRACES CONFIRM MARIN LEFT WING CONTACTS BUT NO PREVIOUS RECORD SPECIFIC FJSTEAL CONTACTS). SUBJECT ACCEPTED AEDIEHARD INVITATION TO DINNER AND RELATIONSHIP FLOURISHED ON BASIS \"FRIENDSHIP AND UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN US AND USSR\". IN COURSE OF MEETINGS (AT LEAST ONCE IN SUBJECT'S APARTMENT) SUBJECT DROPPED NAMES OF \"INFLUENTIAL MEXICAN FRIENDS\" (AMONG THOSE MENTIONED TO FERNALD WERE INDUSTRIALIST CARLOS TROUYET, PRESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SECRETARY JOAQUIN CISNEROS, JOURNALIST AGUSTIN BARRIOS GOMEZ, AND PAINTER DAVID ALFARO SIQUEIROS) WHICH APPARENTLY LED AEDIEHARD TO BELIEVE SUBJECT MIGHT BE WELL-INFORMED ON MEXICAN SECURITY. AEDIEHARD ASKED NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ON POLITICAL MATTERS, SUCH AS: DOES LUIS ECHEVERRIA HAVE BETTER CHANCE OF BECOMING MEXICAN PRESIDENT THAN ANTONIO CARRILLO FLORES; AND WHAT IS REAL PURPOSE OF ROCKEFELLER MISSION (FACT-FINDING COULD NOT BE REAL PURPOSE SINCE EMBASSIES AND\n\nCS COPY\n\nSECRET\n\n25 June 69\n\n201-285412\nCIA in these countries must know everything there is to know.\n\nRecently Aediehard asked if subject had friends in LNPure. When subject said he did (without specifying names) Aediehard asked him to get phone directory, which he needs as LNPure changes directory every six months (true). At 20 June meeting subject told Aediehard he had not yet had chance to try obtain directory, but promised try have one for 25 June meeting.\n\n2. Aediehard has carefully probed subject by asking if he not afraid of having FJstealer to his home (subject replied this would not affect him in any way); by suggesting that subject \"so well informed he must be WOFIRM agent\" (subject laughed this off and told Aediehard he hated WOFIRM); and by explaining to subject he needs the info he asked for \"on one hand to advance in his career and on other hand to prevent misunderstandings to which lack of info can easily lead\". While Aediehard gave subject his phone number, he told subject not to use it. Meetings (usually in restaurants) are arranged in advance, and subject has noted that Aediehard parks six blocks away from meeting place, takes bus to point one block past meeting place, then slowly walks back observing surroundings. Meetings scheduled for hours when restaurants normally quite empty.\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 0763 SECRET\n\nAND AEDIEHARD LOOKS OVER CLIENTEL CAREFULLY.\n\n3. STATION DOES NOT INTEND RUN SUBJECT AS DOUBLE. AMONG OTHER REASONS, WE WOULD BE FORCED COME UP IMMEDIATELY WITH PHONE DIRECTORY AND NAME OF PERSON WHO SUPPLIED IT. SUBJECT ACTUALLY DOES NOT KNOW ANYONE IN LNPURE, AND HE HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED ADMIT TO AEDIEHARD THAT HE HAS NO CURRENT CONTACTS IN LNPURE AND THUS HAS NO READY SOURCE FOR DIRECTORY. HE IS TO ADD THAT HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IT WOULD BE HARD TO DEVELOP SUCH CONTACTS. STATION HOPES THIS CANDOR WILL DISCOURAGE OR DELAY AEDIEHARD'S USE OF SUBJECT AS AGENT AGAINST LNPURE WITHOUT DESTROYING RELATIONSHIP, LEAVING STATION FREER TO SHAPE RELATIONSHIP TO WOFIRM ADVANTAGE (ASSUMING STATION ASSESSMENT OF SUBJECT IS FAVORABLE). FERNALD INITIAL IMPRESSION IS THAT SUBJECT IS SOLDIER OF FORTUNE TYPE. HE OBVIOUSLY CONTACTED LNPURE BECAUSE HE AFRAID HE GETTING IN TOO DEEP; MAY ALSO BELIEVE THERE MONEY TO BE MADE IN GAME HE THUS FAR ENJOYING. NEXT FEW MEETINGS WITH FERNALD WILL BE DEVOTED TO OBTAINING BIO AND BACKGROUND DATA AS WELL AS COMPLETE DETAILS HIS DEALINGS WITH AEDIEHARD.\n\n4. AEDIEHARD PCS DEPARTURE NOW SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER (PER LIREALM-1) OR OCTOBER/NOVEMBER (PER LIBACGN-1 FROM 201-825743).\n\n5. FILE 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 210046 JUN 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 8713\n\nPRIORITY DIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED REDTOP AEXICK\n\n1. REQUEST PRIORITY TRACES JAMES SABORI, BORN ABOUT 1929,\n   CITIZEN OF ITALIAN EXTRACTION, RESIDENT OF TEXAS AND CALIFORNIA,\n   CURRENTLY IN MEXICO ON TOURIST VISA SELLING INSURANCE.\n\n2. SABORI WALKED INTO COS 20 JUNE ON RECOMMENDATION BOB\n   JOHNSON, FORMER LNERGO AGENT GUADALAJARA, NOW RETIRED IN TEXAS.\n   JOHNSON HAD RECOMMENDED COS AS LNPURE FIRST SECRETARY WITH WHOM HE\n   ACQUAINTED.\n\n3. SABORI CLAIMED HE HAS HAD 12 MEETINGS WITH AEDIEHARD,\n   WITH NEXT MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR EVENINGS 20 AND 25 JUNE. SABORI\n   WOULD NOT SAY MUCH ABOUT NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP, EXCEPT THAT AEDIE-\n   HARD HAD ASKED HIM PROCURE LNPURE TELEPHONE DIRECTORY, WHICH\n   WAS REASON FOR HIS CONTACT WITH COS. WHEN ASKED WHY HE WOULD WANT TO\n   FULFILL SUCH A REQUEST, SABORI ANSWERED THAT THERE REALLY WAS NOT\n   MUCH THAT AEDIEHARD COULD GET OUT OF HIM, AN INSURANCE SALESMAN,\n   BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO DO LITTLE FAVORS IN RETURN FOR FAVORS\n   AEDIEHARD COULD DO FOR HIM. AS EXAMPLE, AEDIEHARD HAD INVITED HIM\n   TRAVEL FJSTEAL. COS SAID HE HAD NO AUTHORITY TURN OVER PHONE BOOK.\n\nSECRET\n\nJUL 28 1969\n\nDOC. MICRO BGN\n\n21 JUN 69\n\n201-285412\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 0713 SECRET\n\nSABORI SUGGESTED COS CONTACT \"PROPER PEOPLE\" AND HE WOULD CALL COS FOR ANSWER. ALSO SAID HE HAD NO OBJECTION TO \"PROPER PEOPLE\" CONTACTING HIM AT LOCAL ADDRESS.\n\n4. SABORI CALLED COS AT 1800 HOURS 20 JUNE AND AGREED TO AVOID CALL AT 0900, 23 JUNE. WAS TOLD PERSON CONTACTING HIM WOULD HAVE ALL FURTHER ADVICE, TO WHICH HE ALSO AGREEABLE.\n\n5. PLAN HAVE BRUCE H. FERNALD CONTACT SABORI 23 JUNE TO ATTEMPT TO GET DETAILS OF CONTACTS WITH AEDIEHARD WITHOUT FRIGHTENING SABORI OFF AND WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH CHANCES AEDIEHARD WILL TURN OVER SABORI TO SUCCESSOR. UNLESS THERE ARE DRAMATIC DEVELOPMENTS, STATION SEES THIS AS CHANCE TO GET AGENT IN ON GROUND FLOOR WITH SUCCESSOR RATHER THAN OPPORTUNITY TAKE LAST-DITCH ACTION AGAINST AEDIEHARD. WILL NOT PROVIDE PHONE BOOK BUT WILL TAKE PASSIVE ATTITUDE, EVEN IN FACE SABORI REFUSAL PROVIDE FURTHER DETAIL, UNTIL HE TURNED OVER TO AEDIEHARD SUCCESSOR.\n\n6. INDEX SABORI. FILE: 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 142334Z MAY 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 0238\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED REDTOP AEKICK AEDIEHARD\n\nREF DIRECTOR 01478\n\n1. ASSUMPTION PARA 2 REF CORRECT.\n\n2. FILE: 201-238943; 201-751909; 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\n12 MAY 1969\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\nDESPITE ALEXANDER ALDIEHARD\n\nREFERENCE A: MEXICO CITY 0159 (IN 54970)**\n\nB: MEXICO CITY 0152 (IN 54251)**\n\n1. AGREE WITH GUIDANCE GIVEN LIBACON-1 PER PARAGRAPH 2, AND WITH STATION OBJECTIVES FOR USE LIOVAL-1 PER PARAGRAPH 3, OF REFERENCE B.\n\n2. ASSUME LIOVAL-1 HAS BEEN BRIEFED NOT TO APPEAR ANXIOUS, SHOULD HE BE CONTACTED BY ALDIEHARD, AND THAT THE LATTER SHOULD BE THE ONE TO GENERATE THE MOMENTUM FOR SUBSEQUENT CONTACTS.\n\n3. FILE: 201-238943; 201-751909; 201-285412.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nCSB/X/WI\n\n*Originators Comments: ALDIEHARD flatly demanded that LIBACON-1 introduce him to LIOVAL-1, a request which LIBACON-1 was reluctant to honor. ALDIEHARD said that such an introduction was important to his career.\n\n**ALDIEHARD did not actually state that an introduction was important to his career but left that impression with the reporting source.\n\nCITATION\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 091932Z MAY 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 0159\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED: REDTOP AEKICK AEDIEMARD\n\nREF MEXICO CITY 0152 (M 54239)\n\n1. 8 MAY LUNCH MEETING DID NOT TAKE PLACE. LIBACON-1 PHONED AEDIEMARD TO POSTPONE FOR 45 MINUTES BECAUSE OF CONFLICT WITH CLASS. AEDIEMARD REPLIED IN THAT CASE HE WOULD CALL LIBACON-1 TO ARRANGE LUNCH FOR FOLLOWING WEEK.\n\n2. CLARIFICATION PARA 4 REF: AEDIEMARD DID NOT ACTUALLY SAY THAT MEETING LIOVAL-1 WAS IMPORTANT TO HIS CAREER. THIS WAS LIBACON-1'S INTERPRETATION BASED ON EVIDENT IMPORTANCE TO AEDIEMARD OF MEETING LIOVAL-1. LIBACON-1'S CLEAR IMPRESSION THAT AEDIEMARD HAVING TROUBLES AT WORK (AEDIEMARD SPEAKS CONTEMPTUOUSLY OF HIS COLLEAGUES), AND AEDIEMARD'S STATEMENT EARLIER IN CONVERSATION THAT HE NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO SPENDING NEXT TWO YEARS AT HOME.\n\n3. FILE: 201-283412, 201-283943, 201-751009.\n\nSECRET\n\nCS COPY\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 090040Z MAY 69 C.P. MEXICO CITY 9152\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\n1. IN CHANCE 15-MINUTE MEETING AT OUT OF TOWN SWIMMING RESORT 3 MAY, AEDIEHARD SUDDENLY AND DESPERATELY BRACED LIBACON-1 TO INTRODUCE HIM TO LIOVAL-1. AEDIEHARD PREVIOUSLY AWARE LIOVAL-1 LIBACON-1 CONTACT AND HAD AT TIMES FISHED FOR INTRODUCTION BY OCCASIONALLY ASKING LIBACON-1 TO PUT HIM ON CONTACT WITH PERSONS WHO COULD TRAVEL TO WOLADY, BUT HAD NEVER BEFORE MENTIONED LIOVAL-1 BY NAME. WHEN LIBACON-1 RESISTED BY STATING LIOVAL-1 NOT ONLY HIS STUDENT BUT ALSO GOOD FRIEND WITH WHOM AEDIEHARD COULD ACHIEVE NOTHING BECAUSE OF LIOVAL-1'S PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND POLITICAL CONVICTIONS, AEDIEHARD BECAME ABUSIVE AND FLATLY DEMANDED THAT LIBACON-1 MAKE INTRODUCTION. LIBACON-1 CONTINUED TO REFUSE (HE IS TRULY OPPOSED TO MAKING INTRODUCTION AS HE DOES NOT WANT TO GET INVOLVED WITH AEKICK AND DOES NOT WANT TO DO ANYTHING WHICH WOULD MAKE LIOVAL-1 SUSPECT HE IS INVOLVED WITH AEKICK) AND AEDIEHARD EVENTUALLY INSISTED THEY MEET FOR LUNCH FOLLOWING WEEK TO DISCUSS MATTER FURTHER.\n\n2. LIBACON-1 SELECTED 8 MAY FOR LUNCH (SO THAT HE COULD\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 0152 SECRET\n\nREPORT ABOVE TO CASE OFFICER AT SCHEDULED 7 MAY MEETING. CASE OFFICER INSTRUCTED LIBACON-1 TO CONTINUE BE RELUCTANT IN ORDER TO FORCE AEDIEHARD TO LAY HIS CARDS ON TABLE AND TO DO ALL PLANNING FOR INTRODUCTION. ON OTHER HAND, LIBACON-1 NOT TO BE SO RELUCTANT AS TO PUT HIMSELF ON AEKICK BLACKLIST AND HE SHOULD EVENTUALLY AGREE MAKE INTRODUCTION IF AEDIEHARD CONTINUES INSIST.\n\n3. STATION OBVIOUSLY INTERESTED IN HAVING LIOVAL-1 MEET AEDIEHARD NOT ONLY FOR CONTINUED CLOSE ASSESSMENT AEDIEHARD BUT ALSO TO NOTE ANY AEKICK REACTION TO LIOVAL-1'S INVOLVEMENT IN AEKITE CASE. LIOVAL-1 HAS BEEN BRIEFED ON HOW TO REACT IF APPROACHED BY AEDIEHARD. STATION ALSO WISHES BE IN POSTION TO INTRODUCE PERSONS OF ITS CHOICE TO AEDIEHARD AND/OR HIS SUCCESSOR VIA LIBACON-1 IN FUTURE. HE SHOULD THEREFORE NOT BURN HIS BRIDGES BY ADAMANT REFUSAL INTRODUCE LIOVAL-1.\n\n4. LIBACON-1 SURPRISED BY AEDIEHARD'S COMPLETE \"LOSS OF COOL\" IN INSISTING ON INTRODUCTION. AEDIEHARD EVEN INDICATED THAT MEETING LIOVAL-1 WAS IMPORTANT FOR HIS CAREER AND THAT IF HE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL HE MIGHT HAVE TROUBLE GETTING ANOTHER TOUR ABROAD. HE NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO RETURNING HOME. (STATION COMMENT: ABOVE AND RECENT LIREALM INCIDENT INDICATE AEDIEHARD FEELS SELF UNDER INCREASING\nPAGE 3 MEXICO CITY 0152 SECRET\n\nPRESSURE TO PRODUCE PRIOR TO DEPARTURE.\n\n5. FILE: 201-285412, 201-238943, 201-751909.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 032343Z APR 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 9722\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\nTOP LIREALM AEDIEHARD AEXICK\n\nREF. MEXICO CITY 9456 (n 12827)\n\n1. ON 22 MARCH LIREALM-1 SAW AEDIEHARD AT CLUB. THERE WAS NO OPPORTUNITY FOR AN EXTENDED PRIVATE CONVERSATION. THEY DISCUSSED A MOVIE CAMERA WHICH AEDIEHARD WANTS TO SELL AND LIREALM SAID HE MIGHT FIND A BUYER. THEN TOLD AEDIEHARD THAT HE HAD SOMETHING HE WANTED TO TALK ABOUT AND HOPED TO GET TOGETHER SOON TO DO SO. AEDIEHARD SAID HE WOULD CALL LIREALM DURING WEEK AND TAKE HIM TO LUNCH.\n\n2. ON 24 MARCH AEDIEHARD CALLED LIREALM AT LATTER'S OFFICE FROM PHONE BOOTH (STREET NOISE IN BACKGROUND) TO MAKE LUNCH ON DATE. LIREALM-1 SUGGESTED 26 MARCH AND INVITED AEDIEHARD TO A KEY CLUB WHICH LIREALM USES FOR BUSINESS LUNCHES. AEDIEHARD DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE CLUB BUT AGREED.\n\n3. MORNING OF 26 MARCH AEDIEHARD CALLED LIREALM AT OFFICE TO CANCEL LUNCH GIVING SON'S DOG BITE AS EXCUSE (A THIN ONE SINCE IT HAPPENED A WEEK PREVIOUSLY). HER COMMENT: STATION SUSPECTS AEDIEHARD CASED KEY CLUB AND FOUND NOT TO HIS LIKING SINCE IT IS PRIVATE.\n\nCS COPY\n\nSECRET\n\n4 APR 69\n\n201-255412\n4. On 30 March Lirealm again saw Aediehard at Club. Let Aediehard know he displeased at luncheon cancellation and considered excuse a dodge. (Aediehard's son was there with small bandaid on arm.) From his expression, Aediehard was embarrassed and off-balance.\n\n5. After tennis Lirealm got Aediehard aside to tell him purpose of lunch was to tell him that his joking and needling of Lirealm had embarrassed him in front of Mexicans, particularly recent offer of money. Aediehard interrupted to say it was only a joke. Lirealm said he considered it malicious and he would not tolerate such behavior in front of friends in future. Aediehard apologized profusely, said had no bad intentions and promised not repeat it in future.\n\n6. Lirealm reported Aediehard was completely unprepared for above exchange and was transparently disturbed, distressed, and disadvantaged.\n\n7. Lirealm will continue to be friendly to Aediehard without going out of his way.\n\n8. Will report any further developments.\n\n9. File: 261-265412 and 261-77337.\n\nSECRET\n\nSECRET\n(13) On 12 December 1968 two team members spotted Valentin S. LOGINOV (known KGB) walking with an unknown Mexican male. After LOGINOV departed the Mexican remained at a restaurant for an hour appearing to be waiting for someone. The Mexican finally departed after making a phone call and was lost in heavy traffic. The team members obtained the Mexican's license plate number from which he was identified as Ignacio VALLINA Barros.\n\nFrom notes for COS Conference, 24-28 March 1969\n\n26.285412\nReference: A. HMA-23764, 28 December 1966\nB. HMA-16769, 11 October 1966\n\n1. Per LIEVY Subject of References (Subject) contacted AEDISHARD at 10:15 on 6 February 1966. Subject said that she was in Mexico for a few days before returning to the USA and had just spent two weeks in Acapulco. She invited AEDISHARD for lunch but he could not make it. He agreed to visit her at the home of her aunt (reported in Reference A) at 19:00 the same day.\n\n2. When Subject had not contacted the Station, she was called at the home of her aunt the next morning, 7 February, and a meeting was set for 10:00. Both on the phone and at the meeting, Subject had a severe hangover.\n\n3. Subject gave full information on her call to AEDISHARD on 6 February. She said that she was just about to call the case officer on 7 February when he called her. She did not call in on 6 February because she wanted to wait until after she saw AEDISHARD so that she would have something to report. She stated that she had not visited Mexico since the trip reported in Reference A when she first met AEDISHARD because she is tied down with the care of her mother who is still alive. She had sent two or three letters to AEDISHARD but he had never answered them and on 6 February AEDISHARD said that he had not received them.\n\nAttachment:\nAddress u/a/c\n\nDistribution:\n2 - C/22 u/a/c\n2 - C/22 u/a/c\n\nES CFTI 201-285419\n\n201-285419\n\nHMA-23764\n17 March 1966\n\nS: C: R: Copy in\n4. As previously, Subject's reporting was terribly confused. Almost every point left her into conflicting statements. She said that ADELEHARD arrived at her hotel's home at 18:30 on 5 February. About four women and Subject were there. They were all guests at the luncheon to which ADELEHARD had been invited. The male guests had long since departed to their jobs. ADELEHARD made his usual impression on all the girls, none of whom he had met before. They all loved him. ADELEHARD stayed until 22:00 when he left pleading a previous appointment.\n\n5. ADELEHARD debriefed her on her activities since they last met and told her that he could be coming to New York on vacation. She invited him to visit her and gave him her address and telephone number (under separate cover). She asked about the manuscript of her book which she had left with him. He told her that it was in good hands and that he was looking for a publisher. She told him that she was leaving on the morning of 9 February and he promised to see her again before she left. Actually, ADELEHARD spent considerably more time charming the other ladies than he spent talking to Subject.\n\n6. At 11:30 on 7 February, Subject called ADELEHARD in the case officer's presence. He was not in. She was told to call later which according to LIZZIE she did but he was still not in.\n\n7. The case officer called her again on the evening of 8 February but since ADELEHARD had not contacted her, she was not told. She was instructed to call the station before contacting ADELEHARD on her next visit. She departed on the morning of 9 February.\n\n8. Since ADELEHARD did not engage in significant conversation with her and made no attempt to see her a second time, it would seem that he had no interest in her. This is not surprising since ADELEHARD could hardly escape the same assessment of her that the case officer had. She made an even worse impression than at the first interview\u2014a totally self-centered person who could not even remember the last names of the women who met ADELEHARD although she can talk endlessly about them on how they relate to her. Her mind is totally distracted.\n\n9. In view of the above, the Station believes that Subject would be of no use against ADELEHARD and plans to terminate her, if she reappears in Mexico.\n\nEvan J. Enye\nfor Willard G. Curtis\nSECRET\n\nSEPARATE COVER ATTACHMENT\nTO INDIAN-3 729, 17 MARCH 1949\n\nElizabeth Duncan\nP.O. Box 425\nSpring Lake, New Jersey\n\nTelephone No: 201-449-3309\nSECRET\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\nREDTOP LIREALM AEDIEHARD AEXICK\n\nREF A. DIRECTOR 81831\n\nB. MEXICO CITY 9421 (CN 10973)\n\n1. LIREALM BRIEFED ON REF A PLAN ON 11 MARCH. HE IS IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT AND FINDS IT IN HARMONY WITH HIS COVER STATUS AND TEMPERAMENT. WHETHER AEDIEHARD AGREES TO QUID PRO QUO OR NOT, BOTH LIREALM AND STATION BELIEVE THAT TALK WITH AEDIEHARD WILL STRENGTHEN LIREALM'S COVER. LIREALM IS ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT CONTINUED CONTACT WITH AEDIEHARD ON BASIS QUID PRO QUO.\n\n2. IN EVENT AEDIEHARD DOES NOT AGREE TO QUID PRO QUO AT FIRST ENCOUNTER BUT CONTINUES TO PROVOKE OR HARASS LIREALM, BOTH LIREALM AND STATION CONSIDER IT ESSENTIAL FOR LIREALM TO WALK IN IMMEDIATELY IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT ORIGINAL PLAN FORWARD IN MEXICO CITY 9375 AND 9381. THIS FEATURE WILL BE AUTOMATIC ON FIRST WORKING DAY AFTER ENCOUNTER, LIREALM HAVING CHECKED WITH THE STATION IN ADVANCE.\n\n3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDERS TO STAY AWAY FROM AEDIEHARD, LIREALM HAS SCHEDULED LEGITIMATE BUSINESS TRIP ON 15 MARCH WEEKEND. HE IS COMMITTED TO PLAY AEDIEHARD IN A TENNIS TOURNAMENT.\n\nCS COPY\n\nSECRET\n\n201-285-412\nPAGE 2 MEXICO CITY 9456 SECRET\n\nAND WILL SCHEDULE IT FOR 22 OR 23 MARCH. HOWEVER, IF NATURAL OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO AEDIEHARD OCCURS EARLIER, I.REALM WILL USE THIS OPPORTUNITY.\n\n4. SHOULD LPAURORA SLUG BE USED THIS TRAFFIC?\n\n5. FILE: 201-285412; 201-773337.\n\nSECRET\n\nRECORD OF ACTION\n\nThe following action is authorized:\n\nSigned: [Signature]\n\nR.O. 5310 - 1.4b 56/R40\n\nNote: If applicable, cite reasons and coordinate if appropriate.\nSECRET 102307Z MAR 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 9421\nDIRECTOR\n\nDESPACHO BEDTOP LIREALM AEDIEHARD AEKICK\n\nREF DIRECTOR 81831\n\n1. STATING FULLY CONCEALED PLAN CONTAINED REF. LIREALM-1\n\nWILL BE BRIEFED ON 11 MARCH.\n\n2. IN CONSIDERING TARGETING AEDIEHARD, HE HAS TOLD LIREALM-1\nAND OTHERS IN GROUP THAT HE RETURNING HOME IN JUNE. DOES NOT KNOW\nIF IT IS PCS OR HOME LEAVE. HOWEVER, HIS WIFE TOLD LIREALM THAT IT\nWILL BE PCS AND THAT SHE CANNOT WAIT. SINCE AEDIEHARD ARRIVED PCS\nIN AUGUST 1965, HE IS ABOUT READY FOR PCS TRANSFER.\n\n3. FIE: 201-285412 AND 201-773337.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET 07005 2 MAR 69 CITE MEXICO CITY 9375\nDIRECTOR\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\nREDTOP LIREALM AEKICK\nRFS: A. MEXICO CITY 9375 C IN\n7 MAR 1969.\n\nB. DIRECTOR 81435\n\n1. LIREALM WILL AVOID CONTACT WITH 201-285412. HOWEVER\nLIREALM PARTICIPATING IN TENNIS TOURNAMENT WHERE MIGHT SEE HIM\nBUT CAN EASILY AVOID CONVERSATION.\n\n2. RE PARA 3 REF B: STATION IS INTERESTED IN SUGGESTION\nOF POSSIBLE EXPLOITATION OF THIS INCIDENT AND BELIEVES\nSOMETHING COULD BE DONE WITHOUT REVEALING LIREALM'S TRUE\nWOFIRM STATUS. MOST INTERESTED IN HAVING HEADQUARTERS IDEAS.\n\n3. FILE: 201-773337; 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\n\nRECORDS OFFICER STAMP\n\nThe following action is\nauthorized: [Signature]\n\nR.O. (C) 01-01-69\n\nNote: Incorporation of\n\nUS COPY\n\nSECRET\n\n7 MAR 69\nSECRET\n\n1. FOLLOWING FROM LIREALM-1 SECOND WRITTEN REPORT AND DEBRIEFING ON 6 MARCH.\n\nA. LIREALM-1 AND 201-285412 (SUBJECT) ARE MEMBERS OF AN INFORMAL GROUP WITHIN THEIR CLUB WHICH REPAIRS TO ONE OF GROUPS HOME EVERY SECOND SUNDAY FOR LUNCH AFTER TENNIS. 2 MARCH INCIDENT OCCURRED AT SUCH A LUNCH WITH CA 25 PEOPLE PRESENT.\n\nB. DISCUSSION WAS NOT OUT OF EARSHOT OF OTHER GUESTS BUT AT TABLE DURING LUNCH. SUBJECT MADE AN ATTEMPT TO KEEP IT PRIVATE. IN FACT, AFTER STATING HE HAD SEEN LIREALM SEVERAL TIMES AT SANBORN'S WITH INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS, SUBJECT TURNED TO A GERMAN GUEST AND ASKED, \"DO YOU THINK THAT LIREALM COULD EARN AS MUCH MONEY AS HE DOES, DOING WHAT HE SAYS HE DOES, WITHOUT HELP FROM WOFIRM?\" THE GERMAN, GOING ALONG WITH THE JOKE SAID, \"OF COURSE NOT\".\n\nC. SUBJECT PRESENTED THE WHOLE THING AS A JOKE BUT WITH A DEFINITELY MALICIOUS TWIST.\n\nSECRET\n\n201-285412\nD. THIS PROVOCATION OF HIS CONTACTS IS STANDARD PRACTICE WITH SUBJECT. HE SEEMS TO HAVE A COMPULSION TO COME UP WITH SLIGHTLY OFFENSIVE PROVOCATIONS. TWO WEEKS AGO AT A SIMILAR LUNCH AT ANOTHER GERMAN'S HOUSE, HIS PROVOCATIONS OF SEVERAL GERMANS ON NIXON'S VISIT TO BERLIN AND ELECTION OF PRESIDENT THERE LED TO HIM INSULTING HOSTS AND LEAVING IN A HUFF SHORTLY BEFORE HE WOULD HAVE BEEN EVICTED.\n\nE. LIREALM FEELS THAT HIS HARPING ON LIREALM'S WORK FOR WOFIRM IS SUBJECT'S STANDARD PROVOCATION FOR HIM (LIREALM AND WIFE ARE ONLY AMERICANS IN GROUP) AND THAT SUBJECT HAS NO HARD INFO ABOUT HIS WOFIRM CONNECTIONS. HOWEVER, LIREALM ALSO FEELS THAT IF SUBJECT IS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THIS PROVOCATIVE LINE WITHOUT EFFECTIVE REBUTTAL, LIREALM CAN BE MADE TO LOOK TO FOOL IN THE GROUPS EYES. IN LIREALM'S ESTIMATE NONE OF GROUP SUSPECTS HIS STATUS IN MEXICO BUT THINK THAT THE WOFIRM LINE IS JUST SUBJECT'S WAY OF PROVOKING THE ONLY GRINGO IN THE GROUP.\n\n2. LIREALM STATED THAT SUBJECT IS VERY GOOD IN DISHING IT OUT TO EVERYBODY BUT INvariably COMES OUT A POOR SECOND IN REPARTEE AFTER DELIVERING INITIAL DIG. HE CAN NOT TAKE IT, IS THIN SKINNED, AND EMBARRASSES EASILY.\n3. PLAN OUTLINED PARA 4 REF WAS PRESENTED TO LIREALM WITH PROVISO IT IS SUBJECT TO HIS CONCURRENCE. HE WAS ENTHUSIASTIC SINCE IT PARALLELS HIS OWN THINKING. HE BELIEVES THAT IT WOULD EFFECTIVELY SILENCE SUBJECT, IS GUARANTEED TO THROW HIM INTO DEEP EMBARRASSMENT AND CONFUSION, AND BURN HIM WITHIN THE GROUP SINCE LIREALM WOULD LIKE TO HAVE CONFRONTATION WITH OTHERS PRESENT SINCE WHOLE GROUP KNOWS HOW SUBJECT NEEDLES HIM AND SEVERAL HEARD SUBJECT OFFER HIM MONEY. STATION CONCURS IN THIS ADDITION TO PLAN.\n\n4. HOWEVER, SUBJECT PREFERS NOT TO WALK-IN TO MR. SPRUCE SINCE HE IS HIS ONLY SOURCE OF BUSINESS TRAVEL ADVICE IN THE EMBASSY. HE SUSPECTS THAT SPRUCE WOULD ATTEMPT TO PRY. THEREFORE, AGREED HE WOULD WALK-IN TO SECURITY OFFICER, INDICATE THE NATURE OF HIS PROBLEM, AND ASK TO TALK TO A WOFIRM REP.\n\n5. STATION IS CONVINCED THAT PARA 4 REF PLAN WITH ABOVE MODIFICATIONS WILL EFFECTIVELY TERMINATE SUBJECT'S PROVOCATIONS, IS PERFECTLY NATURAL FOR A PERSON IN LIREALM'S POSITION, AND WILL STRENGTHEN HIS COVER VIS-A-VIS HIS AND SUBJECT'S MUTUAL FRIENDS. THEREFORE, URGE PROMPT HQS CONCURRENCE.\n\n6. FILE: 201-77337 AND 201-285412.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nTO: PRIORITY MEXICO CITY\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\nREFERENCES: A. DIRECTOR-81435\nB. MEXICO CITY-9375 (IN 08492)\nC. MEXICO CITY-9381 (IN 08490)\n\n1. 201-285412 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED AEDIEHARD.\n\n2. THERE APPEAR TO BE TWO KEY OBJECTIVES WHICH SHOULD BE\n   SOUGHT IN THIS LIREALM/AEDIEHARD DEVELOPMENT. THEY ARE:\n   A. PROTECT AND STRENGTHEN LIREALM'S COVER IN A NATURAL\n      MANNER, AND\n   B. OPERATIONALLY EXPLOIT AEDIEHARD'S AGGRESSIVE ATTITUDE\n      IN POSITIVE TERMS SO THAT STATION CAN DEVELOP ADDITIONAL\n      ACCESS TO HIM WHILE MAINTAINING THAT WHICH IS ALREADY EXISTENT.\n\n3. IF OUR ACTIONS ARE CAREFULLY PLANNED, THESE OBJECTIVES\n   NEED NOT CONFLICT. REVIEW OF AEDIEHARD'S FILE REVEALS FOLLOWING\n   GENERAL CONCLUSIONS:\n   A. DESPITE HIS AGGRESSIVE ATTITUDE AND VISIBILITY, THERE\n      DO NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY SIGNIFICANT SUSCEPTIBILITIES.\nB. HIS ACTIONS COULD BE INTERPRETED AS THOSE OF AN RIS OFFICER TRYING TO ATTRACT ATTENTION TO HIMSELF FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER. HE IS NEITHER PARTICULARLY SUAVE NOR SUBTLE IN HIS PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS. YET HE IS CRAFTY, QUICK ON HIS FEET, AND MAKES FAST DECISIONS AND ACTS ON THEM. HE IS DEFINITELY SOCIALLY ACTIVE AND MORE UBQUITOUS THAN MANY OTHER SOVIETS IN MEXICO. THIS VISIBILITY, HIS APPARENT MOBILITY, HIS KNOWN KGB AFFILIATION, AND HIS OUTWARD PERSONALITY MERIT OUR CONSIDERATION FOR PLACING HIM ON STATION'S PRIORITY TARGET LIST.\n\n4. WHILE THE PLAN OUTLINED IN MEXICO CITY 9356 AND FURTHER MODIFIED IN MEXICO CITY 9375 WOULD EFFECTIVELY TERMINATE LIREALM/AEDIEHARD RELATIONSHIP AND CERTAINLY BE NATURAL ACTION FOR U.S. BUSINESSMAN TO TAKE (THEREBY IN HARMONY WITH LIREALM'S COVER), PERHAPS THIS ACTION (REPORTING TO THE EMBASSY HIS CONTACT WITH AEDIEHARD) IS NOT NECESSARY AT THIS TIME. WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVE FOR STATION'S CONSIDERATION SUBJECT, NATURALLY, TO\n\n(continued...)\nMODIFICATION:\n\nA. LIREALM WOULD ATTEMPT AVOID CONTACT AND CONVERSATION WITH AEDIEHARD FOR NEXT FEW DAYS.\n\nB. THEN, AFTER PERHAPS ONE WEEK OR MORE, LIREALM WOULD SEEK OUT AEDIEHARD AND ASK TO SPEAK WITH HIM ALONE.\n\nC. LIREALM WOULD FIRMLY EXPLAIN TO AEDIEHARD THAT HE ENJOYS TALKING WITH HIM ON OCCASION WHEN THEY CHANCE TO MEET BUT THAT AEDIEHARD'S CONSTANT PUBLIC NEEDLING AND JOKING ABOUT LIREALM'S SUPPOSED CONNECTION WITH WOFIRM WAS CAUSING HIM EMBARRASSMENT IN MEXICAN/AMERICAN BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND HAD TO STOP. LIREALM WOULD TELL SUBJECT THAT AS PATRIOTIC AMERICAN CITIZEN HE HAD SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME THINKING ABOUT REPORTING THIS CONTACT TO AMERICAN EMBASSY AND EXPLAINING TO U.S. OFFICIALS HIS PREDICAMENT VIS A VIS AEDIEHARD'S JOCULAR BUT INSISTENT PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS.\n\nD. LIREALM WOULD THEN STATE THAT HE HAD NOT DONE SO FOR THREE REASONS:\n\n(continued...\n(1) He did not want to cause embarrassment for a diehard in event U.S. officials would take some action either through Mexican government or directly with Soviet officials.\n\n(2) He did not want to cause trouble for himself in event U.S. officials decided to investigate him. He felt that regardless whether they did investigate him or not, they would place him on some sort of \"suspicious list\" and this could handicap his business interests and social relationships with various embassy couples with whom he and his wife were friendly.\n\n(3) He saw no reason why he could not continue to see a diehard socially as before but that he knew that if he reported to embassy he would probably be asked to cease this contact in his best interests and those of the embassy.\n\nE. Lirealm would then ask for quid pro quo. \"Let us continue as friends, such as Leonov and I were, but drop this\n\n(continued...)\nSPY ACCUSATION BUSINESS OR I WILL HAVE NO RECURSE BUT TO PROTECT MYSELF AND REPORT TO THE EMBASSY.\"\n\n5. THIS ACTION ON THE PART OF LIREALM IS IN PERFECT HARMONY WITH ACHIEVING OBJECTIVE NUMBER ONE: PROTECTING AND MAINTAINING LIREALM'S COVER. HOPEFULLY IT WOULD SET STAGE FOR CONTINUING CONTACT WITH AEDIEHARD ON PROFITABLE BASIS SO THAT WE CAN PROFESSIONALLY ASSESS THIS SOVIET WHICH FULFILLS THE SECOND OBJECTIVE. WE EVALUATE LIREALM'S REPORTING ON HIS SOVIET CONTACTS AS ACCURATE, LUCID, AND USEFUL. THE RECENT ON AEDIEHARD COMPLETED BY LIREALM IS POSITIVE STEP IN RIGHT DIRECTION. HOWEVER, SHOULD AEDIEHARD PERSIST WITH HIS GAMES PLAYING WE HAVE NOT CLOSED DOOR ON LIREALM GOING TO THE EMBASSY AND CARRYING OUT ACTION DESCRIBED IN STATION MESSAGES. THUS THIS OPTION STILL VALID.\n\n6. APART FROM SEEKING TO OBTAIN ABOVE OBJECTIVES BY TAKING THE INITIATIVE WE ALSO AVOID A LIREALM WITHDRAWAL FROM AEDIEHARD WHICH, NO MATTER HOW WELL PLANNED, SOVIETS WOULD PROBABLY SUSPECT AS SOME FORM OF DEFENSIVE ACTION ON LIREALM'S PART IN VIEW OF HIS\n\n(Continued...)\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\nAUTHENTICATING OFFICER\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE'S PROHIBITED.\nEXPOSURE BY SUBJECT. ACTION SUGGESTED THIS MESSAGE KEEPS CONTACT OPEN, WE MAINTAIN INITIATIVE, DOES NOT PRECLUDE TAKING DEFENSIVE ACTION IN FUTURE SHOULD AEDIEHARD STUBBORNLY PERSIST, AND IS NATURAL FOR SOMEONE LIKE LIREALM GIVEN THIS SORT OF SITUATION. ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE HERE IS FOR STATION TO DETERMINE THROUGH CONTINUED CONTACT PLUS ADDITIONAL ACCESS TAILORED TO LIREALM'S INFORMATION WHETHER OR NOT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENTAL EFFORT AIMED AT RECRUITMENT SHOULD BE INITIATED.\n\n7. THE ABOVE PROPOSAL IS OFFERED TO THE STATION FOR CONSIDERATION. STATION IS IN BEST POSITION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THIS TYPE OF EXPLOITATION OF CONTACT WITH AEDIEHARD CAN BE EFFECTIVE IN TERMS OF FURTHER PROFESSIONALLY ASSESSING THE TARGET AND IN CONSIDERATION OF LIREALM'S OTHER OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES. IN NO WAY DO WE WISH TO HAVE THIS ACTIVITY CONFLICT WITH LIREALM'S ABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCT HIS OTHER PRESENT OR PLANNED OPERATIONAL EFFORTS.\n\n(CONTINUED...)\nSECRET\n\nTO PAGE SEVEN\n\n8. WELCOME STATION COMMENTS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO ABOVE PLAN.\n\n9. FILE: 201-285412, 201-773337.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nHQS. COMMENT: References concern discussions for operational exploitation of LIREALM/AEDIEHARD relationship.\n\nSB/CI/96\nSB/XO\nC/NH/1\n\nCLOSED\n\nWilliam L. Broe\nC/NH\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICERS\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n**REQUEST FOR CODE DESIGNATION**\n\n| REQUEST FOR | PSEUDONYM | ALIAS | CRYPTONYM |\n|-------------|-----------|-------|-----------|\n| NAME ASSIGNED | RICHARD |       |           |\n\n| BRANCH | CASE OFFICER | BADGE NUMBER | HOME PHONE |\n|--------|--------------|--------------|------------|\n| SUEZ   | L. C. M. | 1234567890   | 1234567890 |\n\n**DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR AGENT (what, where, etc.)**\n\nSubject is a Soviet KGB officer in Mexico City.\n\n| STATUS | STAFF EMPLOYEE | CONTRACT EMPLOYEE | STAFF AGENT |\n|--------|----------------|-------------------|-------------|\n|        |                |                   |             |\n\n| TYPE OF ACTIVITY | FI | CI | CA |\n|------------------|----|----|----|\n|                  |    |    |    |\n\n| IS THIS TO BE USED IN CABLE TRAFFIC | YES | NO |\n|-------------------------------------|-----|----|\n|                                     |     |    |\n\n**LIST ANY PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED PSEUDONYM OR CRYPTONYMS**\n\n**THIS PORTION IS DETACHED AND THE ABOVE IS SENT TO CABLE SECRETARIAT ON CRYPTONYMS ONLY THAT WILL HAVE CABLE TRAFFIC**\n\nSignature: [Signature]\n\nDate: 28/5/12\n\n**FILE NUMBER (201 Project Subject)**\n\n2611\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nIMMEDIATE MEXICO CITY\n\nREDTOP LIREALM AEKICK AERIAL\n\nREF: MEXICO CITY 9356 (IN 07511) *\n\n1. PLEASE CABLE DETAILS 6 MARCH DEBRIEFING AS SOON AS AVAILABLE.\n\n2. IN INTERIM LIREALM SHOULD TAKE NO ACTION WITH RESPECT TO REPORTING HIS CONTACT WITH LOGINOV UNTIL FURTHER GUIDANCE RECEIVED FROM HEADQUARTERS. PREFERABLY, HE SHOULD AVOID CONTACT WITH LOGINOV IF POSSIBLE, UNTIL WE HAVE COLLECTIVELY REVIEWED WITH STATION VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES FOR ACTION.\n\n3. REVIEW OF LOGINOV FILE REVEALS COMPLEX PAST HISTORY OF DEALINGS WITH MEXICANS AND OTHERS WHICH WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR POSSIBLE PRESENT EXPLOITATION OF LIREALM DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT EXPOSING HIS TRUE WOFRM STATUS. WILL ADVISE. (Mar 69)\n\n4. FILE 201-773537, 201-285412. *Station reported overture made to LIREALM by LOGINOV.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10065.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 562, "total-input-tokens": 659057, "total-output-tokens": 214432, "total-fallback-pages": 1}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 510, 1], [510, 1020, 2], [1020, 2311, 3], [2311, 3560, 4], [3560, 4853, 5], [4853, 6102, 6], [6102, 7848, 7], [7848, 9908, 8], [9908, 11535, 9], [11535, 12179, 10], [12179, 14253, 11], [14253, 16309, 12], [16309, 18074, 13], [18074, 19969, 14], [19969, 21184, 15], [21184, 23122, 16], [23122, 25147, 17], [25147, 27302, 18], [27302, 29405, 19], [29405, 30678, 20], [30678, 32348, 21], [32348, 34450, 22], [34450, 34838, 23], [34838, 36700, 24], [36700, 38474, 25], [38474, 39675, 26], [39675, 40160, 27], [40160, 40734, 28], [40734, 42766, 29], [42766, 45242, 30], [45242, 47590, 31], [47590, 48594, 32], [48594, 50643, 33], [50643, 53235, 34], [53235, 55520, 35], [55520, 57376, 36], [57376, 59245, 37], [59245, 61079, 38], [61079, 63267, 39], [63267, 65119, 40], [65119, 67168, 41], [67168, 67927, 42], [67927, 70172, 43], [70172, 72066, 44], [72066, 73894, 45], [73894, 74661, 46], [74661, 75952, 47], [75952, 77458, 48], [77458, 78185, 49], [78185, 80012, 50], [80012, 82095, 51], [82095, 84375, 52], [84375, 85060, 53], [85060, 86466, 54], [86466, 88145, 55], [88145, 89445, 56], [89445, 91207, 57], [91207, 93585, 58], [93585, 95071, 59], [95071, 95636, 60], [95636, 97387, 61], [97387, 99466, 62], [99466, 100802, 63], [100802, 101542, 64], [101542, 103405, 65], [103405, 105168, 66], [105168, 106578, 67], [106578, 107786, 68], [107786, 109869, 69], [109869, 111281, 70], [111281, 113654, 71], [113654, 115915, 72], [115915, 118035, 73], [118035, 119811, 74], [119811, 121819, 75], [121819, 122616, 76], [122616, 125073, 77], [125073, 126936, 78], [126936, 129093, 79], [129093, 130924, 80], [130924, 132273, 81], [132273, 134912, 82], [134912, 135390, 83], [135390, 137572, 84], [137572, 139859, 85], [139859, 141839, 86], [141839, 144035, 87], [144035, 146202, 88], [146202, 148271, 89], [148271, 150001, 90], [150001, 150484, 91], [150484, 150724, 92], [150724, 152684, 93], [152684, 153592, 94], [153592, 155924, 95], [155924, 157695, 96], [157695, 159336, 97], [159336, 159751, 98], [159751, 159821, 99], [159821, 160152, 100], [160152, 161333, 101], [161333, 161811, 102], [161811, 162787, 103], [162787, 164037, 104], [164037, 164381, 105], [164381, 166211, 106], [166211, 168421, 107], [168421, 170101, 108], [170101, 172328, 109], [172328, 174266, 110], [174266, 174367, 111], [174367, 174468, 112], [174468, 176622, 113], [176622, 178822, 114], [178822, 180997, 115], [180997, 182991, 116], [182991, 185254, 117], [185254, 187359, 118], [187359, 189603, 119], [189603, 191482, 120], [191482, 192050, 121], [192050, 192599, 122], [192599, 192792, 123], [192792, 193709, 124], [193709, 195160, 125], [195160, 196136, 126], [196136, 196484, 127], [196484, 196484, 128], [196484, 196484, 129], [196484, 196484, 130], [196484, 196860, 131], [196860, 197695, 132], [197695, 199577, 133], [199577, 201718, 134], [201718, 203240, 135], [203240, 204398, 136], [204398, 205050, 137], [205050, 205249, 138], [205249, 205953, 139], [205953, 207716, 140], [207716, 209683, 141], [209683, 211834, 142], [211834, 213475, 143], [213475, 215113, 144], [215113, 217110, 145], [217110, 219088, 146], [219088, 219435, 147], [219435, 221219, 148], [221219, 221712, 149], [221712, 223039, 150], [223039, 223184, 151], [223184, 223184, 152], [223184, 223269, 153], [223269, 223988, 154], [223988, 224487, 155], [224487, 225866, 156], [225866, 226950, 157], [226950, 227126, 158], [227126, 227392, 159], [227392, 228752, 160], [228752, 228924, 161], [228924, 230500, 162], [230500, 231696, 163], [231696, 231879, 164], [231879, 233143, 165], [233143, 234779, 166], [234779, 236405, 167], [236405, 237977, 168], [237977, 238182, 169], [238182, 239484, 170], [239484, 241477, 171], [241477, 244085, 172], [244085, 246627, 173], [246627, 249101, 174], [249101, 251719, 175], [251719, 253892, 176], [253892, 256459, 177], [256459, 259028, 178], [259028, 261524, 179], [261524, 264125, 180], [264125, 266572, 181], [266572, 267862, 182], [267862, 269656, 183], [269656, 272007, 184], [272007, 273910, 185], [273910, 275237, 186], [275237, 276817, 187], [276817, 278552, 188], [278552, 280261, 189], [280261, 280555, 190], [280555, 281004, 191], [281004, 281410, 192], [281410, 281410, 193], [281410, 282532, 194], [282532, 284662, 195], [284662, 285394, 196], [285394, 286316, 197], [286316, 286486, 198], [286486, 286486, 199], [286486, 286629, 200], [286629, 288820, 201], [288820, 291339, 202], [291339, 292778, 203], [292778, 294298, 204], [294298, 295873, 205], [295873, 297514, 206], [297514, 299173, 207], [299173, 300917, 208], [300917, 302548, 209], [302548, 304290, 210], [304290, 305976, 211], [305976, 307631, 212], [307631, 309052, 213], [309052, 309052, 214], [309052, 309978, 215], [309978, 311826, 216], [311826, 313720, 217], [313720, 314930, 218], [314930, 316851, 219], [316851, 317696, 220], [317696, 319250, 221], [319250, 319369, 222], [319369, 320634, 223], [320634, 322335, 224], [322335, 322887, 225], [322887, 324269, 226], [324269, 325687, 227], [325687, 327036, 228], [327036, 328352, 229], [328352, 329682, 230], [329682, 331235, 231], [331235, 333154, 232], [333154, 335022, 233], [335022, 336797, 234], [336797, 338766, 235], [338766, 339694, 236], [339694, 339740, 237], [339740, 339740, 238], [339740, 339740, 239], [339740, 339740, 240], [339740, 339740, 241], [339740, 339740, 242], [339740, 339931, 243], [339931, 341876, 244], [341876, 343863, 245], [343863, 344554, 246], [344554, 346113, 247], [346113, 346172, 248], [346172, 346223, 249], [346223, 346474, 250], [346474, 347702, 251], [347702, 349611, 252], [349611, 350938, 253], [350938, 351259, 254], [351259, 351833, 255], [351833, 351879, 256], [351879, 353379, 257], [353379, 354033, 258], [354033, 354158, 259], [354158, 354259, 260], [354259, 354390, 261], [354390, 355905, 262], [355905, 356252, 263], [356252, 356469, 264], [356469, 357216, 265], [357216, 358239, 266], [358239, 359523, 267], [359523, 361140, 268], [361140, 361522, 269], [361522, 362373, 270], [362373, 363749, 271], [363749, 365593, 272], [365593, 367611, 273], [367611, 369648, 274], [369648, 371600, 275], [371600, 373636, 276], [373636, 374255, 277], [374255, 375612, 278], [375612, 376828, 279], [376828, 378740, 280], [378740, 378918, 281], [378918, 380410, 282], [380410, 381193, 283], [381193, 381566, 284], [381566, 384826, 285], [384826, 385151, 286], [385151, 387229, 287], [387229, 389559, 288], [389559, 390279, 289], [390279, 392225, 290], [392225, 394618, 291], [394618, 396943, 292], [396943, 397393, 293], [397393, 399555, 294], [399555, 403923, 295], [403923, 405862, 296], [405862, 408156, 297], [408156, 410599, 298], [410599, 412410, 299], [412410, 414732, 300], [414732, 415046, 301], [415046, 417074, 302], [417074, 419557, 303], [419557, 420714, 304], [420714, 422920, 305], [422920, 424706, 306], [424706, 426073, 307], [426073, 428077, 308], [428077, 430565, 309], [430565, 432954, 310], [432954, 435074, 311], [435074, 437243, 312], [437243, 439395, 313], [439395, 440651, 314], [440651, 443003, 315], [443003, 443769, 316], [443769, 444322, 317], [444322, 446309, 318], [446309, 446633, 319], [446633, 448608, 320], [448608, 451043, 321], [451043, 452118, 322], [452118, 453660, 323], [453660, 455299, 324], [455299, 455891, 325], [455891, 457434, 326], [457434, 459111, 327], [459111, 460750, 328], [460750, 462436, 329], [462436, 462963, 330], [462963, 464631, 331], [464631, 466408, 332], [466408, 468452, 333], [468452, 470454, 334], [470454, 472445, 335], [472445, 474251, 336], [474251, 476662, 337], [476662, 480156, 338], [480156, 481603, 339], [481603, 484046, 340], [484046, 485164, 341], [485164, 487021, 342], [487021, 488061, 343], [488061, 489283, 344], [489283, 490683, 345], [490683, 492156, 346], [492156, 493501, 347], [493501, 494875, 348], [494875, 496303, 349], [496303, 497739, 350], [497739, 499170, 351], [499170, 500535, 352], [500535, 501982, 353], [501982, 503018, 354], [503018, 505515, 355], [505515, 507378, 356], [507378, 507872, 357], [507872, 507876, 358], [507876, 508303, 359], [508303, 509495, 360], [509495, 512949, 361], [512949, 513708, 362], [513708, 514811, 363], [514811, 517339, 364], [517339, 519406, 365], [519406, 520385, 366], [520385, 522343, 367], [522343, 524910, 368], [524910, 526283, 369], [526283, 528148, 370], [528148, 529908, 371], [529908, 531748, 372], [531748, 533291, 373], [533291, 535040, 374], [535040, 535496, 375], [535496, 536760, 376], [536760, 539129, 377], [539129, 540487, 378], [540487, 542698, 379], [542698, 546033, 380], [546033, 547828, 381], [547828, 550147, 382], [550147, 551459, 383], [551459, 554635, 384], [554635, 555536, 385], [555536, 556222, 386], [556222, 557030, 387], [557030, 557532, 388], [557532, 558265, 389], [558265, 558913, 390], [558913, 559693, 391], [559693, 561718, 392], [561718, 563392, 393], [563392, 566396, 394], [566396, 568341, 395], [568341, 569436, 396], [569436, 569485, 397], [569485, 571386, 398], [571386, 571514, 399], [571514, 572154, 400], [572154, 572154, 401], [572154, 572426, 402], [572426, 573554, 403], [573554, 574140, 404], [574140, 575028, 405], [575028, 575878, 406], [575878, 576811, 407], [576811, 577318, 408], [577318, 578136, 409], [578136, 579193, 410], [579193, 580097, 411], [580097, 580894, 412], [580894, 581942, 413], [581942, 583022, 414], [583022, 583873, 415], [583873, 585068, 416], [585068, 586501, 417], [586501, 587731, 418], [587731, 589153, 419], [589153, 590494, 420], [590494, 591481, 421], [591481, 592607, 422], [592607, 593715, 423], [593715, 594509, 424], [594509, 595379, 425], [595379, 596668, 426], [596668, 597479, 427], [597479, 598467, 428], [598467, 599233, 429], [599233, 600423, 430], [600423, 601691, 431], [601691, 603135, 432], [603135, 604973, 433], [604973, 606629, 434], [606629, 607989, 435], [607989, 608880, 436], [608880, 610338, 437], [610338, 611866, 438], [611866, 613157, 439], [613157, 614468, 440], [614468, 616500, 441], [616500, 617722, 442], [617722, 618648, 443], [618648, 619707, 444], [619707, 621019, 445], [621019, 622267, 446], [622267, 623638, 447], [623638, 624565, 448], [624565, 625920, 449], [625920, 627717, 450], [627717, 628460, 451], [628460, 629997, 452], [629997, 632059, 453], [632059, 633199, 454], [633199, 633995, 455], [633995, 635570, 456], [635570, 635842, 457], [635842, 636953, 458], [636953, 638403, 459], [638403, 639849, 460], [639849, 640292, 461], [640292, 641116, 462], [641116, 641921, 463], [641921, 643454, 464], [643454, 645159, 465], [645159, 646786, 466], [646786, 648480, 467], [648480, 649015, 468], [649015, 650739, 469], [650739, 652518, 470], [652518, 652761, 471], [652761, 653745, 472], [653745, 654876, 473], [654876, 655875, 474], [655875, 656922, 475], [656922, 658090, 476], [658090, 659727, 477], [659727, 661917, 478], [661917, 662915, 479], [662915, 664169, 480], [664169, 665368, 481], [665368, 666556, 482], [666556, 667172, 483], [667172, 668347, 484], [668347, 669512, 485], [669512, 670763, 486], [670763, 671997, 487], [671997, 673287, 488], [673287, 673898, 489], [673898, 674714, 490], [674714, 676250, 491], [676250, 677811, 492], [677811, 677932, 493], [677932, 678610, 494], [678610, 678714, 495], [678714, 678838, 496], [678838, 679999, 497], [679999, 680901, 498], [680901, 681679, 499], [681679, 682507, 500], [682507, 682659, 501], [682659, 683172, 502], [683172, 683787, 503], [683787, 684257, 504], [684257, 684591, 505], [684591, 684591, 506], [684591, 684956, 507], [684956, 684956, 508], [684956, 684956, 509], [684956, 686037, 510], [686037, 686037, 511], [686037, 686607, 512], [686607, 687277, 513], [687277, 687370, 514], [687370, 687649, 515], [687649, 687649, 516], [687649, 688108, 517], [688108, 688108, 518], [688108, 688108, 519], [688108, 688485, 520], [688485, 688487, 521], [688487, 689628, 522], [689628, 691373, 523], [691373, 693340, 524], [693340, 696326, 525], [696326, 697280, 526], [697280, 697543, 527], [697543, 698659, 528], [698659, 699375, 529], [699375, 700588, 530], [700588, 701870, 531], [701870, 703139, 532], [703139, 704365, 533], [704365, 705338, 534], [705338, 705539, 535], [705539, 706518, 536], [706518, 707381, 537], [707381, 708486, 538], [708486, 709764, 539], [709764, 709890, 540], [709890, 710996, 541], [710996, 712039, 542], [712039, 712531, 543], [712531, 713966, 544], [713966, 716289, 545], [716289, 716437, 546], [716437, 717529, 547], [717529, 717962, 548], [717962, 718522, 549], [718522, 719241, 550], [719241, 720119, 551], [720119, 721286, 552], [721286, 722430, 553], [722430, 723270, 554], [723270, 724270, 555], [724270, 725140, 556], [725140, 726037, 557], [726037, 727207, 558], [727207, 728162, 559], [728162, 728554, 560], [728554, 729718, 561], [729718, 730576, 562]]}}
{"id": "aa6134ed0d4320d4938284a3217dd3c9d97d8b17", "text": "MATERIAL REVIEWED AT CIA HEADQUARTERS BY\nHOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS STAFF MEMBERS\n\nFILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME: **LOPEZ, HENRY P**\n\n201-253203\n\nVOL. II\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES:\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION:\n\nROOM:\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY:\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 6/5/74        | 10/5/74       | LEO                      | Elmer J. Long                  |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nREFERENCE: MEXI-2755, dated 11 March 1965\n\nForwarded herewith is the coverage of Henry Lopez' telephone for the period 17 February 1962 to 26 March 1962.\n\nStuart R. Pataker\nfor Willard C. Curtis\n\nThe following action is authorized by: R/2AR\n\nS: John Blake Smith\nR.O. 1962\n\nAttachment:\n1. As Stated (HEREWITH)\n\nDistribution:\n1. WH w/att h/w\n3. Files\n\nCS COPY\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\n\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\n\nDATE\n\nMEXI-25595\n17 March 1965\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, Benefits and Services Division/OP\n\nWILLIAM\n\nHospitalization Claim - Edward C. VICKERS\n\n(a) EMT - 5701, dated 9/22/65\n(b) EMT - 6030, dated 12/9/65\n\n1. Please inform subject employee that a check in the amount of $542.93 was forwarded to DZARN on 4 November 1965. This amount represents all benefits payable under subject's Contract Hospitalization Insurance policy for the claim he submitted with reference (a).\n\n2. If subject has any further questions regarding transmittal of his settlement, he should contact DZARN.\n\nJames K. Herriott\n\nJAMES K. HERIOTT\n\nDistribution:\n3, CIO-Mexico City\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nOP/BSO/IB KLuchalski 11c 5109\n\n1 ID\n\nAC/ID\n\n1 VII\n\nWII/Pers.\nTO: MEXICO CITY\n\nFROM: DIRECTOR\n\nCONF: WIL 8\n\nINFO: VR, FILE, RID COPY, OF 2\n\nSIG-GEN\n\nTO: MEXI\n\nINFO\n\nCITE DIR\n\nREFS: A. DIR 47834\n\nB. MFX1 T/A 64-66\n\nSINCE TICHBORN PAID BY STATION, LOAN SHOULD BE CARRIED BY STATION AND $125 PAYROLL DEDUCTION APPLIED.\n\nACCORDINGLY, HQRS T/A'ING LOAN TO STATION AND RETURNING DOCUMENTATION.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nSally Tichborn\n\n201 file\n\nWILLIAM V. BROE\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nChief, IM Division\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nADMINISTRATIVE/PROCEDURAL\n\nOvert and Covert 1964 Income Tax Forms of Edward G. TICORN\n\nACTION REQUIRED: Per Paragraph 1\n\nREFERENCE: MEXI 5550\n\n1. Please query Jerome H. BALSIS in regard to the location of the 1964 overt and covert tax returns and payment check in the amount of $1774.00 of Edward G. TICORN and advise.\n\n2. TICORN states that he passed the only two copies of each return and the check to BALSIS on 29 April 1965. Further states that BALSIS told him he would completely audit both returns to assure their accuracy in regard to mathematical computations and application of tax liability. BALSIS was to return a copy of the overt return for TICORN's retention.\n\n3. A thorough search of Station files failed to uncover the subject tax returns and check or any transmittal record of returns or payment.\n\n4. Since TICORN will be extremely hard pressed to duplicate the returns without a copy of the overt return, the location of the returns is very important.\n\nWILLARD C. CURTIS\n\nDistribution:\n3 - WIP\n\n201-253263\n\n1947-6033\n\n10 December 1965\nSECRET 081945Z\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 5559\n\nREF: DIR 62414\n\n1. 1964 COVERT TAX RETURNS FOR BENADUM, LIMOTOR 19 (BARBARA C. HUGIO), PINEINCH, SANDAMANIE BEING SENT BY HMMT 6219 IN 1st DEC POUCH. NOT POUCHED EARLIER AS OVERLOOKED IN STATION ADMIN FILES.\n\n2. RETURN FOR CAZAZZUS SENT HMMT 5399 APR 23 (JOINT WITH DOUGLAS J. FEINGLASS). RETURN FOR LIFUED 3P, NOW RITA N. BLAZIK, SENT HMMT 5908, 28 OCT 65.\n\n3. LINUFF 1 SUBMITTED RETURN THROUGH OVERT CHANNELS; SIGNED COPY BEING POUCHED KGS.\n\n4. WILL REPORT ON TICHBORN SEPARATELY.\n\nSECRET ADVIS. HMMT 5399 APR 23\n\nCFN 5559 62414 1964 BENADUM LIMOTOR 19 BARBARA C HUGIO PINEINCH SANDAMANIE HMMT 6018 19 NOT POUCHED CAZAZZUS HMMT 5399 APR 23 DOUGLAS J FEINGLASS LIFUED 3P RITA N BLAZIK HMMT 5908 28 OCT 65\n\nLINUFF 1 KGS\n\nBY:\n\nSECRET\n\n[Signature]\n\n26/33203\nSECRET 080108Z\nDIR INFO LAPA ZITE MEXI 5541\nKICAFER LICOLIC\n\n1. SINCE TICHBORN MAY WELL BE NEEDED IN LAPA NEXT SPRING,\nSTATION AND THOMAS W. LUND (IDEN) HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSED COVER\nPOSSIBILITIES WITH HIM. WHILE NO CONCRETE PROPOSAL FORTH COMING,\nHAVE CONCLUDED THAT PART OF PROBLEM STEMS FROM HIS NEVER HAVING\nBEEN IN BOLIVIA, AND STATION LAPA NOT HAVING PEOPLING OF HIM AND\nHIS CAPABILITIES.\n\n2. SUGGEST BRIEF VISIT TICHBORN TO LAPA UNDER TOURIST COVER TO\nCONSULT WITH LAPA OFFICERS AND SURVEY COVER POSSIBILITIES.\nTHIS MONTH BEST TIME FROM MEXI STANDPOINT; NEXT ISSUE LIREAM\nPUBLICATION HAS JUST GONE TO PRINTERS AND HE RELATIVELY\nFREE TRAVEL. TICHBORN FULLY COOPERATIVE, ANXIOUS TO SERVE IF\nNEEDED.\n\nSECRET\n\n59669 TICHBORN LAPA THOMAS W. LUND NO CONCRETE NOT HAVING LAPA\nMONTH BEST TIME LIREAM\n\nSECRET\n\nTichborn\n201 fil\n3.1. 28.3.63\nPLS ADVISE WHEN HQS CAN EXPECT 1964 COVERT TAX RETURNS REQUESTED HQS-4366. IF NOT RECEIVED SOON, KUBARK MAY BE FORCED REVEAL TRUE NAMES TO IRS WHO WILL THEN TAKE DIRECT ACTION.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nRequested 8 delinquent 1964 Covert Income Tax returns.\n\nWH/B&F\n\nWilliam V. Broe\nC/ND\n\nW. J. Kaufman\nC/WH/1\nDIR INFO LAPA CITE MEXI 5309 (EASSY ACTING)\n\nKICAPER LIREAM\n\n1. AFTER EXTENSIVE CONSULTATION WITH TICHBORN, STATION UNABLE\nDEVELOP ACCEPTABLE PROPOSAL FOR HIS COVER IN LA PAZ. HAVE EXAMINED\nAND DISCARDED THESE MAIN POSSIBILITIES:\nA. LAWYER WITH MINING CLIENTS,\nB. WRITER WITH FOUNDATION GRANT,\nC. PRODUCER OF POSSIBLE MOVIE.\n\n2. IN REGARD TO CIA: TICHBORN BELIEVES HE CERTAIN TO RUN INTO:\nHENRY HILL, WHO LEGITIMATELY INTERESTED IN BOLIVIAN ANTIMONY\nMINING, HAS CONSULTED IN PAST WITH TICHBORN, AND WOULD RECOGNIZE\nFISHY NATURE HIS PRESENCE LA PAZ. TICHBORN\nBELIEVES HILL WOULD REACT BADLY, SPEAK WORD THEIR MUTUAL CIRCLE.\n\n3. PROPOSAL IS SMELLS TOO STRONGLY OF OPERATION CAMELOT, AND WOULD\nOPEN TICHBORN TO ATTACK EVEN FROM THOSE TO WHOM THIS COVER MIGHT\nAPPEAR PLAUSIBLE.\n\n4. PROPOSAL IC WOULD IMMEDIATELY DRAW ATTENTION FROM ALFARO\nMUTIS, CLOSE ACQUAINTANCE OF TICHBORN, AND LATIN AMERICAN REP OF.\n\nTichborn\n\n001-233203\nVENTIETH CENTURY FOX.\n\nMUTIS JOB IS TO TRAVEL AREA, KEEP CLOSE TRACK OF ANY AND ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN CINEMA FIELD. TO HIM THIS COVER WOULD APPEAR LUDICROUS, AS IT WOULD TO TICHBORN-MUTIS CIRCLE OF ACQUAINTANCES IN MEXICO.\n\n5. ALL ABOVE IDEAS ARE, OF COURSE, COVER FOR STATUS ONLY. COVER FOR ACTION WITH PROMINENT POLITICAL PERSONALITY MUCH MORE DIFFICULT PROBLEM, AND STATION AGREES THAT CLANDESTINITY PROBABLY ONLY RECURSE. WHILE MEXI NOT CLOSELY FAMILIAR OPS CLIMATE LA PAZ, SPECULATE THAT TICHBORN WOULD QUICKLY BECOME OBJECT OF CURiosity IN SMALL CAPITAL. HE DEFINITELY NOT LITTLE GRAY MAN TYPE, AND MEXI CONSIDERS THAT JOB OF CONCEALING SIGNIFICANT BEHIND SCENES ROLE IN FAST MOVING POLITICAL SITUATION COULD UNDULY TAX HIS TRADECRAFT.\n\n6. TICHBORN HAS SUBMITTED MEMO MAKING ABOVE POINTS PLUS SOME SPECULATION REGARDING USE OF FALSE IDENTITY, WHICH STATION CONSIDERS UNREALISTIC, WILL POUCH ADDRESS.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFN 530 TICHBORN LA PAZ CLIENTS (MAY TICHBORN HENRY WILL ECLIVIAN & ANTIMONY MINING LA PAZ CAMELOT. IC ALFARO MUTIS FOX TICHBORN-MUTIS\nNOT CLOSELY LA PAZ TICHEER SMALL CAPITAL NOT LITTLE GRAY MAN TYPE\n\nUNDULY TAX MEMO\n\n91\n5 November 1963\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, CI/CA\nATTENTION: Mr. Brown\nREFERENCE: WH/1 Memorandum\u201410-June 1963\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN\n(201-253203)\n\n1. This is to confirm telephone conversation this date between Mr. Lally of your Office and Mr. Halliwell of WH/1.\n\n2. WH/1 again requests that a new Operational Approval be expedited on Subject. TICHBORN'S project is awaiting this action in order to undergo renewal for FY 1966.\n\n3. Please advise this Office if any further action is required by the Branch.\n\nW.J. Kaufman\nChief, WH/1\n\nDistribution:\nOrig. & 1 - Addressee\n1 - Dosier\n\nDDP/WH/1/Zorance:bp\nSECRET\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, Western Hemisphere Division\nEdward G. TICHBORN, Administrative\n\nAction Req: Para 2\n\nReferences: A. HMTT = 5791, 22 Sept 65\nB. HXXI 5449\nC. HMTT = 5271\n\n1. Due to operational requirements a meeting was not held with Edward G. TICHBORN by an Admin representative, however, the items noted below were briefly discussed with him by telephone on 26 October.\n\n2. TICHBORN was advised information would be forwarded to the Station and, upon his return to the Station, he should ask his contact about the items\u2014both as a reminder and for fuller explanation. As will be noted, there is a time element concerned with c. below.\n\na. Reference A (Transmittal of hospitalization claim). TICHBORN asked about the claim and was advised the dispatch was received 3 October and the separate cover was received by the Insurance Branch on 25 October. The Insurance section has agreed to expedite the claim and it is expected Finance will advise the Station of the amount of reimbursement to TICHBORN within the next two-three weeks.\n\nb. Reference B (Concerned signing the contract amendment forwarded by Book Dispatch 5178). The provisions of the 3E regarding signing the amendment still pertain. The subject was very briefly but, by no means thoroughly, explained. In this connection, it had been planned to have him read the two attached pamphlets \"Your Social Security\" and \"Social Security Amendments\u20141965\". If cover or operational considerations do not preclude, the pamphlets may be given to TICHBORN to either read and return to the Station or to retain.\n\nCONTINUED...\n\nHMS - 4279 28 October 1965\n\nSECRET\n\nWM/Pers/U.S. Renehan: gms 6376\n\nDistribution:\n1 = WM/Pers wo/att\n1 = WM/1 wo/att\n1 = WM/Reg wo/att C/WM/PERS\n\nC/WM/1\nc. Reference C (Transmitted Income Tax Information in response to Box Dispatch 4659). The Tax Committee was checked regarding TICHORN and advised they needed additional explanatory information from TICHORN prior to being able to compute an assessment and bring his under the revised tax procedures. TICHORN could not recall sufficient facts and figures to provide the required information. He was therefore advised it was to his benefit to submit the information to the Station as soon after his return as practicable.\n\n(1) Other Income. He had indicated receipt of fees but did not state whether they were the result of work outside the U.S. or if they were received while in and as a result of work in the U.S. If the fees were earned as a result of work outside the U.S., they are excludable for federal tax purposes.\n\n(2) Itemized Deductions. He had indicated under \"other\" $1400, but did not provide any breakdown or explanation as to what the amount represented. It is necessary to provide sufficient supporting information to enable the Committee to recognize the amount as an allowable item. He also indicated a loss of $2,000 on investments. Explanatory facts are required such as dates, when, reason for the loss (sale of stock at $X versus cost of $X or whatever), whether the loss was a carryover from prior year(s), etc. It is better that too much information be provided rather than too little.\n\nTICHORN is to provide the information in writing with his certification as to completeness and accuracy for transmittal to Headquarters. If the information is received within the first part of November it is likely the revised procedures will be applied for the 1963 tax year.\n\nErnest A. Lushy\n\nAttachments:\nAs Stated\n\nDistribution:\n2 - CGS, Mexico City\nMEMORANDUM FOR: WH/BAF\n\nSUBJECT: Transfer of funds via CCS/EC to LINEAH Activity, Mexico City\n\nREFERENCE: DIR 33750 3 Aug 65\n\nIt is requested that $3,500.00 from Project LILIPUT be transferred through CCS/EC to the LINEAH activity in Mexico City. The details on the actual transfer from a New York bank to the Instituto Cultural Inter-American, Banco Nacional de Mexico, Sucursal Lomas, Mexico D.F., Mexico of $4,500.00 allegedly being made by Cunn Canfield, and a Cashier's check from a New York bank for $4,000.00 allegedly donated by Robert Dowling to be posted to the Station from Headquarters, have been discussed with CCS/EC.\n\nW.J. Kaufman\nChief, WH/1\n\nDistribution:\n\nOrig. & 1 - Addressee\n1 - CCS/EC\n1 - 50-126-36/2\n>1 - 201-253203 (WH/1)\n1 - WH/1\n\nDDP/WH/1/Halliwell:bp 28 Oct 65\nSECRET 141750Z\nDIR CITE MEXI 5027\nLICOLIC LIREAM\nREF A DIR 49356\nB MEXI 5025 (N 72965)\n\n1. TICHBORN ETA NEW YORK 17 OCT, WILL WAIT CONTACT HILTON HOTEL.\n\n2. IN ADDITION TICHBORN COVER AND FUTURE OF MAGAZINE, SUGGEST HQS AND TICHBORN WORK OUT MORE ADVANCED METHOD OF FUNDING LIREAM.\n\nPRESENT ARRANGEMENTS NO LONGER APPEAR ADEQUATE.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFA 315 17 OCT 5025 TICHBORN ETA 17 OCT HILTON HOTEL HQS AND TICHBORN WORK OUT MORE NO LONGER\n\nSECRET\n\nHQS CONSIDERED TICHBORN NEW YORK TRIP.\n\nNicholson 201\n\n201 - 25-3 203\nActive Records: 10,000\n\n1. Electronic data processing methods of the Internal Revenue Service have made it necessary to effect a procedure to enter Social Security self-employment records directly into computers, transferred for more current records (Independent Contractors) who do not have an available Social Security number on their contracts. Such individuals will be transferred the Social Security number and protection applicable to other Federal employees. Instructions at this time are that it will require a change in the 1965 tax year to continue implementation.\n\n2. The attached memorandum is for your information and includes a contract form for Independent Contractors in the new procedure. Acceptance of the individual is predicated upon a Social Security number as a lesser rate for the same period.\n\n3. It is suggested that individual union officers acquire the above to inform the employees.\n\nAttachments: 1. Contract\n\nDistribution:\n\n2 - C/PEPS\n1 - W/1\n1 - W/2\n1 - W/3\n1 - W/4\n1 - W/5\n1 - W/6\n1 - W/7\n1 - W/8\n1 - W/9\n1 - W/10\nSECRET\n\nMr. Edward C. Tichborn\n\nDear Mr. Tichborn:\n\nReference is made to your current contract with the United States Government, as represented by the Contracting Officer.\n\nArrangements have been recently completed allowing certain independent contractors of this organization to obtain social security credits by covering such individuals under the social security tax provisions applicable to employees. These arrangements also include a provision for retroactive applicability to the beginning of the 1965 tax year. This can be done only for reasons of security since the procedure results in reducing the social security tax from the self-employed rate to the employee rate. For example, in January of 1965 the tax rates were 5.4% and 3-5/8% respectively.\n\nAs a consequence thereof, said contract is amended by deleting all reference to social security and by adding the following paragraph:\n\n\"Effective 1 December 1964, social security taxes will be covertly deducted by this organization from your compensation in the same manner and to the same extent as would be done if you were a Government employee. Security reasons make this procedure necessary. Its implementation does not imply in any manner the actual creation of an employee-employer relationship. Your legal status under this agreement continues to be that of an independent contractor.\"\n\nIf you receive or expect to receive full or partial social security credits from overt sources you will so notify this organization and an adjustment will be made or covert deductions discontinued, depending upon the circumstances. Further, if you should subsequently receive overt social security credits, evidence thereof will be submitted to this organization. In such event your covert credits will be erased and your covert deductions returned.\n\nAll other terms and conditions of said contract remain in full force and effect.\n\nUNITED STATES GOVERNMENT\n\nSIGNED\n\nBY\n\nContracting Officer\n\nSECRET\n\nGroup 1 - Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification.\nREF: MEXI 4855 (IN 60704)*\n\n1. REFERENCE LOAN APPROVED. TA LOAN TO HQS.\n\n2. OBTAIN AND SEND TO HQS FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SIGNED BY TICHBORN.\n   A. PROMISSORY NOTE IN THE AMOUNT OF LOAN.\n   B. RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING FUNDS RECEIVED.\n   C. MEMO AUTHORIZING PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS HIS SALARY EFFECTIVE 1 NOVEMBER 65 OF $125 MONTHLY.\n\n3. PROJECT LICOLIC WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR EXTRA $3000 TO PROVIDE LOAN STIPULATING REPAYMENT OVER TWO YEAR PERIOD.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n*MEXI 4855 Request approval TICHBORN $3,000 for purchase car in US.\nSECRET 27234452\n\nDIR CITE HX1 4355\n\nLICOLIC\n\n1. PRO APPROVAL ADVANCE TICKET 3000 DOLLARS FOR PURCHASE CAR IN US. WILL WORK OUT REGULAR REPAYMENT SCHEDULE. DISCUSS WITH ANGELITA.\n\n2. TICKET MUST EXIT AND REENTER MEXICO PRIOR TO PLANS TRAVEL LAREDO, PICK UP CAR, FRESH VISA.\n\nSECRET\n\nCNP 4255 TICKET 3000 IN US 13 OCT CT\n\nSECRET\n\nTick for 20125321\n\n20125320\nAction Required: Priority\n\nThe following agents in Mexico City are delinquent in the filing of their 1964 Covert Income Tax returns. You are requested to obtain these outstanding returns as soon as possible since delinquent tax returns are subject to 6% statutory interest on the unpaid tax due from 15 April to the date of payment, and in addition are also subject to a penalty of 5% per month, not to exceed 25% of the tax liability.\n\nJeremy K. BENADUM\nSandra B. CAZAZZUS\nLIFEUD/30\nLHUFF/1\nLIMOTOR/19\nJoyce C. RHEINCH\nJohn R. SANDAMANTE\nPhilip K. TESSAROLO\nEdward G. TICIBORN\n\nErnest A. LUSBY\n\nDistribution:\nOrig 6 1 - COS, Mexico City\nSECRET 032232Z\nDIR CITE MEXI A330\nLIREAM DTDORIC\n\n1. TICBORN WILL ATTEND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENERAL\nSEYANTICS, SAN FRANCISCO, NINE TO THIRTEEN AUGUST, AT INVITATION\nORGANIZER S.I. HAYAKAWA. HE IS SCHEDULED TO SPEAK ON NINE AUGUST\nAND LEAD PANEL DISCUSSION ON THIRTEEN AUGUST. AT HAYAKAWA'S\nSUGGESTION HE WILL MOUNT LIREAM DISPLAY AND WILL DO WHATEVER\nELSE APPROPRIATE TO PUSH PRODUCT.\n\n2. PLANS TO BE IN CONTACT WITH EDGAR KAISER (THROUGH HAYAKAWA)\nCHAIRMAN BOARD KAISER INDUSTRIES, AND WITH PHILANTHROPIST NORMAN\nSIMON (THROUGH JUNE WAYNE, HEAD OF TAMARIND GALLERY). ALTHOUGH\nNEITHER TICBORN NOR STATION PARTICULARLY SANQUINE POSSIBILITY\nCONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD LIREAM FROM THESE PERSONALITIES BELIEVE\nSUCH PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITY ON HIS PART HELPS SUPPORT HIS COVER.\n\n3. HE WILL ALSO CALL ON WALLACE STEGNER, HEAD OF CREATIVE\nWRITERS CENTER AT STANFORD AND ON ARTHUR COONS, EX-PRESIDENT OCCIDENTAL\n\nCOLLEGE, THROUGH WHOM HE HOPES TO BE INTRODUCED TO SUCH CALIFORNIA\nCULTURAL FOUNDATIONS (UNSPECIFIED) AS MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN LIREAM.\n\nSECRET\n\nTicborn 201\n\n201-253203\nSECRET\n\n4. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTACT TICHBORN (PERHAPS IN REGARD TO\nSUBJECT #1 4312) WE WILL BE BEVERLY HILTON LOS ANGELES FROM\nFOUR TO EIGHT AUGUST AND AT FRANCIS DRAKE SAN FRAN EIGHT TO THIRTEEN\nAUGUST.\n\nSECRET\n\nGEN: 4332 TICHBORN GENERAL SEMANTICS SAN FRANCISCO S I HAYAKAWA\nHAYAKAWA'S LIFEAH EDGAR KAISER HAYAKAWA KAISER NORMAN SIMON.\nJUNE WAYNE TAKING NEITHER TICHBORN NOR STATION LIFEAH WALLACE\nSTEGNER STANFORD ARTUR COONS EX-PRESIDENT OCCIDENTAL\nCOLLEGE CALIFORNIA LIFEAH HOS TICHBORN 4312 BEVERLY HILTON LOS\nANGELES FRANCIS DRAKE SAN FRAN\n\nSECRET\nMEMORANDUM FOR:\n\nChief, WA Division\n\nSUBJECT: Self-Employment Credit for Social Security Coverage\n\nEdward O. Stenberg\n\n1. The responsibility for filing Schedules SE (Form 1040) \"U. S. Report of Self-Employment Income\" with the Social Security Administration for credit to the taxpayer's social security account has been delegated to this office for those individuals who have filed covert returns.\n\n2. In order to discharge this responsibility and to ensure that each contract agent receives full social security credit for any self-employment tax paid through the Covert Unit, it is necessary for this office to prepare the Schedule SE (Form 1040) for each taxpayer for secure transmission to the Social Security Administration. In order to complete Form SE for Subject Contract Agent, it is necessary that the following information (designated by an \"X\") be furnished:\n\n   X  Tax Name (As it appears on Subject's Social Security Card)\n\n   X  Social Security Number\n\n   X  Statewide address currently applicable or the address used when the taxpayer last resided in the U. S.\n\n   X  Type of business activity to be reflected in reporting Social Security credits from self-employment, such as management consultant, translator, writer, etc.\n\n3. Since a three year statute of limitations applies to the filing of self-employment schedules for social security coverage, it is requested that the above information be furnished as soon as possible. Any questions regarding this subject should be directed to 60/100/Covert Tax Branch.\n\nS. M. O'Keeffe\nChief, Covert Tax Branch\nMEMORANDUM FOR: CI/OA\n\nATTENTION: Mr. Lally\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (201-253203)\n\nREFERENCES: CI/OA Memorandum of 30 September 1964\nCI/OA Memorandum of 3 June 1961\n\n1. All of the information requested on Subject has now been submitted to your office. Project LICLICLIC, which provides support for TICHBORN, describes Subject's duties as follows:\n\n   a. Subject moves in Mexican leftist and Marxist intellectual circles with a good range of associations in this milieu; in this context, he has successfully developed and now publishes an intellectual magazine under Station direction.\n\n   b. He is available to the WH Division for travel to other Latin American countries for political assessments or for ad hoc assignments involving contact with local political figures of interest.\n\n   c. He is used to handle dissident or disaffected Communists or far leftists where contacts are required by other Stations and where CA objectives are involved.\n\n2. It is requested that a new OA on Subject be expedited.\n\nW. J. Kaufman\nChief, WH/1\n\nDDP/WH/1/CHalliwell:1jc (10 June 1965)\n\nDistribution:\nO & 1 - Addresses\n1 - 201-253203\n\nSECRET\nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND REVIEW\n\n| TO:          | 3 June 1965 prc |\n|--------------|----------------|\n| WH/1 - R. Armijo | 201-253203    |\n| FROM: CHIEF, CI/OA |                |\n| 7th Edward P. Brown |                |\n| SUBJECT: LOPEZ, Henry P. |            |\n\nIN ORDER THAT FURTHER CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN YOUR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW, OR REVIEW INFORMATION AS INDICATED.\n\n| PRO 1 | REVIEW OF STAFF/O Dossier |\n|-------|---------------------------|\n| PRO 2 | REVIEW OF STAFF/O COLLATERAL INFORMATION |\n| FIELD TRACES | REVIEW OF SECURITY OFF., REPORT AT CI/OA |\n| HI TRACES | REVIEW OF SEC. OFF., CONCURRENCE MEMO AT CI/OA |\n| OPERATIONAL AND DIVISION TRACES | REVIEW OF FBI REPORT AT CI/OA |\n| RESULTS OF TECHNICAL INTERROGATION | REVIEW OF ATTACHED REFERENCE |\n| GREEN LIST | OTHERS (See Remarks) |\n\nNOTICE: FIRST | 2ND | 3RD AND FINAL |\n\nREMARKS:\n\nReceipt is acknowledged of PRO Part II.\n20 May 1965\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: CI/CA\n\nATTENTION: Mr. Lally\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN\n(201-253203)\n\nTo further assist you in your reinvestigation of TICHBORN,\nthere is attached a copy of an updated FRQ Part II on him.\n\nW. J. Kaufman\nChief, 45/1\n\nAttachment:\nFRQ Part II (1 copy)\n\nDDP/NI/1/JZerance:jm (20 May 1965)\n\nDistribution:\nO & 1 - Addressed\n1 - 201-253203\nSECRET 1917572\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 3465\n\nREF A HMMW 13631\nB HMM 261030\nC HMM 26033\nD HMMT 5461\n\nREFS B AND C APPARENTLY CROSSED REF A IN POUCH. IN ADDITION\nREF D IN THIS WEEK'S POUCH SHOULD CONTRIBUTE.\n\nSECRET\n\nCEN\n\nSECRET\n1. The Station, after reference incident, felt more strongly than ever that it really did not have a complete assessment of TICHORN in the sense of what is his real ideological viewpoint. This is not to say that the Station was overly concerned that TICHORN was flirting with the opposition. As a result of the events described below, the Station feels it has a reasonably clear idea on these points now.\n\n2. On 15 May, being a Saturday and two days prior to TICHORN entering a Mexican hospital for a long-delayed and somewhat apprehensive (on his part) hernia operation, TICHORN was in an unusually loquacious mood for a luncheon engagement with the Station case officer. He showed little opposition to three good Manhattan and, for the first time, the Station case officer felt he was seeing clearly TICHORN \"the person\" and not TICHORN \"the lawyer\". In other words, there was no protective veneer involved in the rather long luncheon discussion which followed. The issue which brought forth the entire discussion was reaction of the Mexican intellectual to the Dominican Republic situation. In the process, TICHORN brought out very sincerely, passionately, and clearly the following points:\n\na. When he was a trial lawyer in California for five years, his real inclinations were what he termed \"leftist\". He harbored a number of \"reservations\" about the way that things were or were not happening in the U.S. under the U.S. system. These were private thoughts and reservations and did not translate\n\n-continued-\n\nDistribution\n\n3- WH\n\n231-253202\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\n\nDISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER\n\nHMNT-5661\n\nDATE\n\n17 May 1965\n\nCLASSIFICATION\n\nSECRET/REMARKS\n\nDESIGNATED\n\nNO. 5 FILE NUMBER\nthemselves into action, but nonetheless points of real concern to him. Then, he came to Mexico for a period to get \"that\" novel and writing off his chest; during that period, he saw the Mexican system and some of the Latin American Systems. At that juncture, he became very much aware of the fact that it was the \"system\" that counted, in spite of whatever imperfections existed, and that there \"was, and is, nothing that can anywhere nearly approach the U.S. system\". As he said, \"Sure, there are a lot of things wrong, because of decisions made by human beings who are fallible and have their own interests to look after, but there is so much good and so many compensations on the plus side of the system and the way it works, you can afford to recognize the wrongs and work them out within the system\". He said that this was so obvious from abroad that he just wondered why he ever had worried about incidents and didn't realize that it was the \"system\" that mattered.\n\nb. He told about some of the discussions he had had with leftist Mexican intellectuals on these points such as, \"Is the Soviet system capable of producing and absorbing such pictures as 'Dr. Strangelove' or having a John Steinbeck write a 'Grapes of Wrath' and run off with all prizes in the writing and motion picture field? Can you even approximate that in Mexico? Witness the furore over 'The Children of Sanchez' here while the 'Grapes of Wrath' was every bit as harsh with respect to similar circumstances in the U.S. and won everything.\" On and on. In so many words, our system thrives on \"self-criticism\", and there are things to criticize, but what other system in this world is not only permissive of that, but thrives on it. And so on. He has no doubts about any governmental/social/political/economic system in any combination being able to even approach it.\n\n3. The foregoing is a very brief synopsis of a rambling and long philosophic discussion on these points in which TICHBORN concluded his statement and, even, tirade (his Latin heritage had gotten the better of him at that point) with the statement that \"My philosophy on this point, and my present sentiments, have been forged in the fire of thinking as a leftist critic and having come to see and understand a great deal; and they can't tell me a damn thing about what is the best system nor on the basis of their present circumstances in their own countries have they any right or basis for criticizing the U.S. and its actions. Nothing is perfect, and I can't defend it as being perfect, but for every imperfection they try to show me in the U.S. and what it has or has not done, I can show them hundreds in their country and any other one they try to hold up as a model.\"\n\n4. In so many words, at least the Station case officer at the present time is satisfied in his own mind that TICHBORN was speaking sincerely during this discussion and there is no question in the Station's mind about where TICHBORN stands ideologically even though he may be considered \"left of center.\"\n\n5. Since this issue seems to hover constantly in the background with TICHBORN as far as KUBARK is concerned, the Station felt it would be a good idea to register the foregoing incident and appraisal with Headquarters.\n\n[Signature]\n\nWilliam C. CURTIS\nAC REQ: Submission of updated PRQ Parts I and II\n\nREF: DIP 96004, 26 March 1965\n\nSince KUBESK is reprocessing TICHBORN's clearance, they have requested an updated PRQ Part I and a new PRQ Part II. Please submit additional biographic information since 1959 and full details of Subject's use by the Station in order that we may facilitate the reprocessing.\n\nChester D. DAINOLD\n\nDistribution:\nO & I - COS, Mexico City\n\n20 - 253203\n11 May 1965\n\nSECRET\n\n1 - RI\n1 - Chrono\nSECRET 112007Z\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 3353\n\nREF A. DIR 68802, 11 MAY 65\n\nB. HXMT-5265, 11 MAR 65\n\n1. REF B FURNISHED INFO ASKED REF A.\n\n2. RETURNS DISPATCHED AS FOLLOWS: HAMMARQUIST HXMT-5170, 1 FEB 65 ITEM 48 POUCH 4517; TESSAROLO HXMT-5012, 9 NOV 64 ITEM 44 POUCH 4443; TICHBORN HXMT-5111, 17 DEC 64 ITEM 77 POUCH 4482; LINDUFF 4525\n\nONE HXMT-5205, 11 FEB 65 ITEM 81 POUCH 4525\n\nSECRET\n\nON REQUESTED INCLINE TAX FINS,\n\nSECRET\n\nTICHBORN 101\n\n201-253263\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WHF\nINFO OF 65 UR FILE\n\nTO: MEXI\nINFO\nCITY OR\n08802\n\nREF: IDNS-3992, 3 MAR 65*\n\nPLS FORWARD OVERDUE COVERT INCOME TAX RETURNS ON HAMMARQUIST,\nTESSAROLO, TICHBORN AND LIRUFF ONE ORIGINALLY REQUESTED SEPT 1964.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n* Requested overdue income tax returns be forwarded.\n\nDesmond Fitzgerald\nC/WD\n\nTichborn\n\nW. J. Kaufman\nC/WD/1\nREFERENCE: DIR-56004 (IN 53853), dated 26 March 1965\n\nForwarded herewith is an updated PRQ-I on Henry P. Lopez. It was completed on a local Spanish form since this type of form looks much less official than the others.\n\nStewart R. Patchen\nfor\nWillard G. Curtis\n\nAttachment:\n1. As Stated (HEREWITH)\n\nDistribution:\n1 - WHD w/att hw\n2 - Files\n\nMMMA-26033\n6 May 1965\nSECRET\n1. Nombre completo: HENRY P. LOPEZ\n   (Primer nombre) (Apellido paterno) (Apellido materno)\n\n2. Su firma corriente\n\n3. Nombre al nacer, (si es distinto) ENRIQUE L. LOPEZ\n\n4. Aliases, apodos o cambios legales en su nombre (indique brevemente en que tiempo, la raz\u00f3n para su uso, y a donde)\n\n5. a. Fecha de nacimiento 5/18/30 b. Lugar de nacimiento MAY 1 1930\n   DENVER, COLORADO\n\n6. Ciudadan\u00eda en la actualidad U.S.A. Raza\n\n7. Nacionalidad al nacer y cualquier otra nacionalidad que haya adquirido despu\u00e9s (si distinta del No. 6) U.S.A.\n\n8. Residencia en la actualidad (direcci\u00f3n) SIERRA APARTMENT 249\n   Due\u00f1o o inquilino\n\n9. Direcci\u00f3n permanente (si es distinta de la indicada en el No. 8)\n\n10. Su ocupaci\u00f3n en la actualidad (puesto, sueldo) LAWYER\n\n11. Ha sido usted naturalizado como ciudadano de los Estados Unidos? X\n    Indique la fecha y a nombre de qui\u00e9n se expidi\u00f3 el certificado de naturalizaci\u00f3n\n\n12. Parientes, amigos, personas con quienes corresponde en los Estados Unidos, Nombre y Direcci\u00f3n:\n   MR. JOS\u00c9 LOPEZ 5111 HUNTING AVE. LOS ANGELES, CALIF.\n   MR. ALFREDO LOPEZ 3301 WILSON AVE. PASADENA, CALIF.\n   MR. SANDER JENSEN 515 11TH ST. LONG BEACH, CALIF.\n13. Padre - Nombre completo, ocupaci\u00f3n, direcci\u00f3n actual, fecha y lugar de nacimiento, nacionalidad al nacer y nacionalidades subseguintes:\n\nJos\u00e9 P. L\u00f3pez, 5201 Bullock Ave., Los Angeles, California. Nacido el 25 de octubre de 1890 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1915.\n\n14. Madre - (la misma informaci\u00f3n que del padre)\n\nHermelina Mart\u00ednez de L\u00f3pez, 5201 Bullock Ave., Los Angeles, California. Nacida el 16 de abril de 1895 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1915.\n\n15. Esposa (o marido): nombre completo, nombre de soltero, fecha y lugar de nacimiento, fecha y lugar del matrimonio, nacionalidad al nacer y cualquier otra nacionalidad que haya tenido despu\u00e9s, direcci\u00f3n actual, divorcio, anulaci\u00f3n de matrimonio. (De la misma informaci\u00f3n en cualquier otro matrimonio anterior que haya tenido)\n\nMildred Garc\u00eda L\u00f3pez, nacida el 15 de mayo de 1923 en Hermosillo, Sonora. Naci\u00f3 el 15 de mayo de 1923 en Hermosillo, Sonora. Se cas\u00f3 con Jos\u00e9 P. L\u00f3pez el 15 de mayo de 1945 en Los Angeles, California. Se divorci\u00f3 de Jos\u00e9 P. L\u00f3pez el 15 de mayo de 1945 en Los Angeles, California.\n\n16. Hijos: nombre completo, sexo, fecha y lugar de nacimiento, nacionalidad actual y cualquier otra nacionalidad que haya adquirido despu\u00e9s, direcci\u00f3n actual.\n\nJos\u00e9 L\u00f3pez, nacido el 27 de febrero de 1937 en Los Angeles, California.\n\nGregory L\u00f3pez (alg\u00fan nombre), nacido el 6 de agosto de 1939 en Los Angeles, California.\n\nDorothy L\u00f3pez, nacida el 17 de septiembre de 1937 en Los Angeles, California.\n\n17. Hermanos y hermanas: nombre completo, sexo, fecha y lugar de nacimiento, nacionalidad, direcci\u00f3n actual.\n\nAlfredo L\u00f3pez, nacido el 5 de julio de 1914 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1937.\n\nJoseph L\u00f3pez, nacido el 25 de febrero de 1918 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1937.\n\nBeatrice L\u00f3pez, nacida el 25 de febrero de 1918 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1937.\n\n18. Parientes al servicio de cualquier gobierno, nombres y puestos que ocupan.\n\nAlfredo L\u00f3pez, nacido el 5 de julio de 1914 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1937.\n\n(Alfredo L\u00f3pez, nacido el 5 de julio de 1914 en Chihuahua, Chihuahua, M\u00e9xico. Nacionalidad mexicana. Ingres\u00f3 en 1937.)\n19. Indique todos los carnets de identidad que tiene, con fechas, n\u00fameros, lugar donde fueron expedidos y fecha hasta que sean v\u00e1lidos.\n\n15 August\n\nIssued at Buenos Aires, Argentina\n\n20. Religi\u00f3n. Es miembro de alguna orden religiosa?\n\nCatholique\n\n21. Afiliaciones pol\u00edticas, en la actualidad y anteriormente\n\nDemocrat\n\n22. Viajes fuera del pa\u00eds en que reside - pa\u00eds que visit\u00f3, fechas, prop\u00f3sito del viaje, gente y firmas comerciales que visit\u00f3.\n\nSeveral - you have all the data\n\n23. Educaci\u00f3n - escuela en que asisti\u00f3, lugar, cursos, diplomas, fechas.\n\nUNIVERSITY OF DENVER 1942-43 B.A. Political Sci.\nHARVARD UNIV. GRAD SCHOOL 1945-46 Economics\nHARVARD LAW SCHOOL 1946-48 Bachelor of Laws\n\n24. Idiomas y dialectos (indique si los sabe bien, regular o mediocremente)\n\nIdioma SPANISH Habla ___ Leo ___ Entiende ___\n\nIdioma ENGLISH Habla ___ Leo ___ Entiende ___\n\nIdioma ___ Habla ___ Leo ___ Entiende ___\n\n25. Servicio militar - fechas, de que pa\u00eds, que unidad, grado, facci\u00f3n, donde prest\u00f3 sus servicios, decoraciones, cuando fue licenciado y por qu\u00e9. D\u00e9 detalles si alguna vez fue prisionero de guerra.\n\nU.S. ARMY 1942-44 Letterman Medical Corp, Co. B, 1st\n\n26. Indique de que organizaciones ha sido o es socio (profesionales, sociales, pol\u00edticas, etc.)\n\nHarvard Club de Medell\u00edn\n27. Habilidades especiales, capacidades, aficiones, (radio, fotograf\u00eda, etc.)\n\n28. Situaci\u00f3n monetaria - sueldo, dep\u00f3sitos en los bancos, bonos, propiedades.\n\n29. Datos de empleos - clase de trabajo, sueldo, fechas, patrones, direcciones, razones para dejar el empleo. Incluya empleos que haya tenido con cualquier gobierno.\n\n30. Ha escrito algo? De detalles incluyendo t\u00edtulos de libros, art\u00edculos, casa impresora, fechas.\n\nEnumere las personas que viven en su misma direcci\u00f3n, sus socios \u00edntimos (individuos o grupos), sus correspondientes dentro y fuera del pa\u00eds.\n\n32. D\u00e9 cinco personas como referencias, con direcciones:\n33. Antecedentes de Corte - La Corte, fecha, detenciones, cargos, fallos, etc.\n\n34. Descripci\u00f3n:\n\n| Edad          | 44  |\n|---------------|-----|\n| Edad que representa | 44  |\n| Postura       | 5'10\" |\n| Peso          | 170 lbs |\n| Altura        | 5'10\" |\n| Dientes       | completo |\n| Ojos          | marr\u00f3n |\n| Pelo          | negro |\n| Forma de la cara | oval |\n| Cicatrices    | more |\n| Cutis         | brillo |\n| Figura        | elegante |\n| Sexo          | Male |\n| Aspecto general | elegante\u00edsimo |\n| Facciones prominentes | more |\n| Otras facciones distintivas | more glasser |\n\n35. Otros datos biogr\u00e1ficos y comentarios.\nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND REVIEW\n\nTO: WH/1 - R. Arrijo\nFROM: CHIEF, CI/DA\nEdward P. Brody\n\nC NO. 201 - 253203\n\nSUBJECT: LOPEZ, Henry P.\n\nIN ORDER THAT FURTHER CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN YOUR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW, OR REVIEW INFORMATION AS INDICATED.\n\n| PRO I | REVIEW OF STAFF/D Dossier |\n| PRO II | REVIEW OF STAFF/D COLLATERAL INFORMATION |\n| FIELD TRACES | REVIEW OF SECURITY OFF. REPORT AT CI/DA |\n| AT TRACES | REVIEW OF SEC. OFF. CONCURRENCE MEMO AT CI/DA |\n| OPERATIONAL AND DIVISION TRACES | REVIEW OF FTR REPORT AT CI/DA |\n| RESULTS OF TECHNICAL INTERROGATION | REVIEW OF ATTACHED REFERENCE |\n| GREEN LIST | OTHERS (See Remarks) |\n\nNOTICE: FIRST | SECOND | THIRD AND FINAL |\n\nREMARKS:\n\n**** FINAL INVESTIGATIVE REPORT\n\nThis field inv. report contained no derog on Subj. It was reviewed by the WH/1 desk officer on 6 May. It disclosed that Subj's cover since his residence in Mexico City is holding up very well re his friends and associates in Los Angeles. They report that LOPEZ is believed to be working for motion pix and legal work in Lexi. and that he enjoys a good income of around 30,000. (It's around 23th).\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH\nINFO: C/0 A, VR, FILE\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nINFO: C/0 A, VR, FILE\n\nLICOLIC\n\nREF: DIR 90817\n\nPLS FORWARD UPDATED BIO DATA PRQ I SINCE OCT 1959\nAND NEW PRQ II EDWARD G. TICHBORN.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nWH Comment: Ref-KUDESK reprocessing clearance on Subj.\n\nDESMOND FITZGERALD\nCHIEF\nWHD\n\nW. J. KAUFMAN\nCHIEF\nWH/1\n\nFAX 201-253203\nREFERENCE: HIC-3432, 22 April 1964\n\n1. The delay in answering reference should not be construed as lack of desire or intent, on the part of TICHORN or the Chief of Station, that the case be submitted to the Board of Review for Shortages and Losses for consideration, but rather as an administrative delay of getting the facts, people, papers, etc., together and in one place for submission.\n\n2. Attached is a statement prepared by TICHORN regarding the loss of funds and containing the pertinent circumstances of the case. The sub-paragraph numbers are in accordance with, and relating to, the requirements of paragraph 3, a of HIC 34-350. The information requested in sub-paragraphs numbered 8 through 12 is answered jointly by Stewart R. PATANEK and Jerome H. BALSIS who were assigned to investigate the matter by the reporting official.\n\n3. PATANEK and BALSIS talked with TICHORN, at different times, regarding the shortage of funds and the happenings as related to them were substantially the same as outlined in TICHORN's statement. Since there is no other way to verify the facts and TICHORN has proven himself to be truthful and forthright in his dealings with the Station his statement regarding the loss of funds is accepted as fact.\n\n4. Since TICHORN is authorized travel expense \"on actual, reasonable, and necessary expense basis\" it does not seem sensible for him to have reported the loss of funds in other than the way he says actually happened.\n\n(continued)\n\nDistribution:\n3 - IC, w/att\n5. It is recommended that TIC1508 be allowed the amount of $575.00, representing loss of funds while enroute from Parama City to Buenos Aires on 25 March 1963, and a credit T/A be sent to Station to clear the advance established in TIC1508's account by Headquarters T/A 10295A, dated 23 June 1963.\n\nWILLARD C. CURTIS\n\nThis is to certify that the above report, to the best of my knowledge and belief, includes all information pertinent to the consideration of the settlement of the account.\n\nWILLARD C. CURTIS\nSECRET 0618452\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 2712 (EASBY ACTING)\n\nLICCLIC\n\nREF DIR 78516\n\nREF DIP 69715\n\nTICHBORN GOING BE TIED UP WITH FOURTH ISSUE GRANITILE\nFROM APRIL THRU LATE MAY IF ANY PLANS NEAR FUTURE RE REF.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFN\nReference: DIR 67851\n\nAction Required: FYI\n\n1. Forwarded herewith is the referenced amendment Edward G. TICHBORN's contract which provides for a one year extension effective 19 November 1964 and a compensation increase from $9,000 to $12,000.\n\n2. During Subject's recent TDY in Washington it was made clear to him that this substantial pay raise and extension of his contract was on the basis that TICHBORN continue to devote 85 to 90% of his time to KUBARK activity. In view of the fact that Subject is currently handling only one intellectual project for the Station, please explain to him that in the event that his work load reverts to the 50 to 65% level, he cannot expect to continue to receive the present amount of compensation. During Subject's talks at Headquarters, it appeared that TICHBORN understands this most clearly. As a contract agent, he is remunerated on the basis of services rendered. In return for this arrangement, the government makes no claim on income he might receive from his private business activities. Obviously it is our hope that coupled with the occasional full-time assignments in other WH countries levied on TICHBORN, that the Station will be able to continue to utilize Subject's services at the high level of activity which will justify his current compensation.\n\nChester D. DAINOLD\n\nAttachment: Amendment, h.w.\n\nDistribution: Orig & 1 - COS, Mexico City\n\n201-253203\nSECRET\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, CI Division\n\n1963 Covert Income Tax Returns\n\nReference: HEMS 3700, September 1964\n\nPlease reply to reference which concerned the delinquent Covert Income Tax Returns of:\n\nOtto HANMARQUIST\n\nLIEUT-1\n\nPhilip K. TESSAROLO\n\nEdward C. TICHEORN\n\nChester D. DAIGOLD\n\nDistribution:\nOrig 5 1 - COS, Mexico City\n\n3 MAR 1964\n\nHEMS 3092\n\nSECRET 201-209600\n\nRI\nChrono\n\nWH/1\n\nJane Zerance: jah\n\n4523\nREFERENCE: H003-3952, dated 15 January 1963\n\n1. Referenced dispatch has caused TICHBORN and the Station to become aware of some new problems with the Mexican banking system. As Headquarters may not be aware, TICHBORN has a dollar account with a Mexico City bank for his personal affairs. Mexican banks do not return cancelled checks to the depositor, but only provide statements. TICHBORN requested his bank to provide him with his cancelled check (on a loan basis) so that copies could be made of it. It developed over a period of several weeks that the bank could not locate this check nor had it been run through TICHBORN's account. Since ample time had expired (it was mailed in June 1964), the bank checked all accounts of persons with TICHBORN's last name on the theory that it might have been run through someone else's account (not an unusual occurrence here). It had not that the bank could discover.\n\n2. As a result, TICHBORN is stopping payment on the check with the bank, writing the office with which he filed his overt income tax, advising that office of the circumstances, and requesting some word back whether or not, in fact, that office received and cashed the check. If the check was received, TICHBORN will provide the Station with a copy of the letter so stating and remove the \"stop payment\" order on the check. If the check was not received (mail is another problem), then TICHBORN will send another check and a copy of the interchange of correspondence on the matter with the bank and the income tax authorities will be provided Headquarters. It is hoped this will be satisfactory.\n\n3. The only reason the Station is providing all the gruesome details on the foregoing is so that Headquarters will have some understanding of the Mexican banking problems should questions of this nature arise again.\n\nDistribution:\n3 - WND\n2 - Files\n\nWillard C. CURTIS\n\nfor\n\nTICHBORN\n\n24 February 1963\nCentral Cover Staff concurs in your proposal to use subject for the purpose indicated. In keeping with the requirement placed upon CCS to maintain an accurate register of current nonofficial cover activity, you are specifically requested to advise CCS/NC promptly by memorandum when subject has been activated. The pseudonym assigned subject should be provided CCS/NC at the time notification of activation is forwarded. If notification of activation is not received in CCS/NC one year from above date it will be assumed proposed use did not materialize.\n\n\u2610 If check mark appears here, information of interest concerning subject or his employer is in CCS/NC files. After operational approval is received, and prior to making arrangements for initial contact thereunder, you are specifically requested to confer with CCS/NC concerning other Agency interests possibly affected and the advisability of additional coordination.\n\n\u2610 If check mark appears here the proposed use of subject requires DDP approval under CSI 240-6, para. 5. Please review CSI 240-6 and initiate action as appropriate.\n| 1. SUBJECT (TYPE NAME IN ROM. (FS - SURNAME IN UPPER CASE) |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Barry D. Lopez 20-253303-C7/PA                              |\n| 2. ALIAS, VARIANT SPELLING, ETC NUMBERS, ETC.              |\n|                                                            |\n| 3. DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH                                 |\n| 4. 26 May 1920 Denver, Colorado                           |\n| 5. PRESENT ACTIVITIES AND OCCUPATION                       |\n| Legal Advisor to motion picture company Productions        |\n| Marc IV, S. A.                                            |\n| Mexico D. F., Mexico                                      |\n| 6. OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES, EDUCATION                    |\n| LLB Harvard Law School 1948                               |\n| Phi Beta Kappa 1942                                        |\n| Writer and Lecturer                                       |\n| 7. PAST ACTIVITIES INCLUDING MILITARY SERVICE             |\n| ACTIVITY                                                  | LOCATION | DATES |\n| US Army Medical Corps 1942-1943                            | La As, Calif. | 1945-57 |\n| Attorney, specializing in trial work                      |          |       |\n| Subject active in California state politics; ran          |          |       |\n| unsuccessfully for Secretary of State, 1953                |          |       |\n| 8. OTHER SIGNIFICANT DATA (POLITICS, RELIGION) - ADD EXTRA SHEETS WHEN NEEDED |\n| Democrat Catholic                                         |\n| 9. DESCRIPTION (HEIGHT) (WEIGHT) (EYES) (HAIR) (FACE) (OTHER) |\n|                                                            |\n| 10. SPOUSE (IF WIFE, GIVE MAIDEN NAME)                     |\n| Mildred McGregor born Lexington, Kentucky                  |\n| 11. OTHER MEMBERS OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY AND ASSOCIATES       |\n| 12. THREE-STEP CHILDREN, SONS AND DAUGHTER (SUCH AS \"DEROGATORY\" MAY RESULT IN A SEARCH THAT DOES NOT FULLY MEET REQUIREMENTS) |\n| See Green List 077832 April 1959                           |\n| 116322 July 1961                                           |\n\nINSTRUCTIONS: INSERT CARBON; FILL OUT FORMS COMPLETELY; SEND BOTH SHEETS TO F/D.\nTO: R. Armijo\nFROM: F1/D\n\nA. SEE DOSSIER ON SUBJECT IN F1/D BIOGRAPHIC FILES.\nB. A MEMORANDUM IS ATTACHED HERETO.\nC. WITH THE LIMITED IDENTIFICATION PROVIDED IN THE REQUEST, F1/D IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE IS INFORMATION ABOUT THE SUBJECT OR NOT.\n   Except\nD. F1/D HAS NO INFORMATION ON SUBJECT. IF INFORMATION ABOUT THE SUBJECT APPEARS AT A LATER DATE, IT WILL BE REPORTED TO YOU AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.\nE. THE SUBJECT OF THIS REQUEST IS APPARENTLY THE SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING:\n\n* Previous green list request from PP/PAD, 13 Apr 59, op, GL 77832, No record.\n  WH/PO/B, 7 July 1961, op, GL 111621, No record.\n\nNOTE TO THE ORIGINATING OFFICE:\n\nWHEN THE SUBJECT IS NO LONGER IMPORTANT TO YOUR OFFICE, THIS SHEET, WITH THE FOLLOWING CANCELLATION NOTICE COMPLETED, SHOULD BE SENT TO F1/D.\n\nREVIEW YOUR FILE OF THESE SHEETS FREQUENTLY, AND SEND TO F1/D THE SHEETS FOR PERSONS THAT ARE NO LONGER OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST TO DEMAND A CONTINUING NAME CHECK. PLEASE DO NOT TIE UP F1/D'S FACILITIES WITH CONTINUING SEARCHES FOR INFORMATION THAT IS NOT REQUIRED.\n\nTO: F1/D\nFROM:\n\nCANCEL THE STOP CARD FOR THIS REQUEST\nSECRET\nREQUEST FOR APPROVAL OR INVESTIGATIVE ACTION\n\nTO: COOPERATIONAL APPROVAL AND SUPPORT DIVISION\nCHIEF, INVESTIGATION AND SUPPORT DIVISION, OFFICE OF SECURITY\nCHIEF, PERSONNEL SECURITY DIVISION, OFFICE OF SECURITY\n\nFROM: R. Arriaga\n33/1\n382607\n4523\n\nSUBJECT: Henry P. Lopes\nCRYPTONYM, PSEUDONYM, AKA OR ALIASES\nEdward O. Tichborn\n\nPROJECT: TICIC\nCIA/FO FILE NO.\nRI 201 FILE NO.\nSO FILE NO.\n251203\n\n1. TYPE ACTION REQUESTED\n\n| PROVISIONAL OPERATIONAL APPROVAL | PROVISIONAL PROPRIETARY APPROVAL |\n|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|\n| OPERATIONAL APPROVAL             | PROPRIETARY APPROVAL              |\n| PROVISIONAL COVERT SECURITY APPROVAL | COVERT SECURITY APPROVAL         |\n| COVERT SECURITY APPROVAL         | SPECIAL INQUIRY (30 FIELD INVESTIGATION) |\n| CONTRACT TYPE A                   | CONTRACT TYPE B                   |\n\n2. SPECIFIC AREA OF USE\n\nMexico\n\nDuring past FY subject has assisted in the development and publishing of an intellectual journal. Also political action missions to other Latin American countries.\n\n3. FULL DETAILS OF USE\n\n4. INVESTIGATION AND COVER\n\nA. U.S. GOVERNMENT INTEREST MAY BE SHOWN DURING INVESTIGATION? [X]\n\nB. CIA INTEREST MAY BE SHOWN DURING INVESTIGATION? [X]\n\nC. IS SUBJECT AWARE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT INTEREST IN HIM? [X]\n\nD. IS SUBJECT AWARE OF CIA INTEREST IN HIM? [X]\n\n5. INDICATE ANY LIMITATIONS OR COVERAGE IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SUBJECT.\n\n6. SUGGEST \"COVER PRETEXT\" TO BE USED IN CONDUCTING PERSONAL INVESTIGATION OF SUBJECT.\n\n7. DO YOU PLAN TO MAKE SUBJECT WITNESS OF AGENCY OR GOVERNMENT INTEREST? [X] YES [NO]\n\nIF NO INVESTIGATION OUTSIDE CIA, EXPLAIN FULLY\n\n8. PR2 AND GREEN LIST STATUS\n\n| PR2 OR EQUIVALENT, IN (2) COPIES ATTACHED | PR2 IS WILL BE FORWARDED |\n|------------------------------------------|--------------------------|\n| GREEN LIST ATTACHED, NO: 167603          |                          |\n\n9. RI TRACES\n\n| NO RECORD | WILL FORWARD |\n|-----------|-------------|\n\n10. DIVISION TRACES\n\n| NO RECORD | WILL FORWARD |\n|-----------|-------------|\n\n11. FIELD TRACES\n\n| NO RECORD | WILL FORWARD |\n|-----------|-------------|\n\n12. DEROGATORY INFO.\n\n| LIST SOURCES CHECKED | DEROGATORY ATTACHED |\n|----------------------|---------------------|\n\n13. SIGNATURE OF BRANCH CHIEF\n\nSECRET\n\n2/11/23\nSubject: Review of 1963 Overt and Covert Tax Returns\n\nFrom: [Name]\n\nTo: [Name]\n\nDate: 17 December 1963\n\n1. Headquarters review of [Name]'s 1963 overt and covert tax returns revealed that he reported his covert income on the overt return and that the tax computation on the overt return was incorrect. The covert return appears to be correct, however, it will be necessary for [Name] to advise Headquarters whether correspondence has been received from [Office] regarding the apparent error in the overt tax computation.\n\n2. It is, generally, the rule that a copy of the cancelled check, in payment of the overt tax liability, be forwarded to Headquarters even if covert income is reported on the overt return.\n\n3. It would be appreciated if [Name] would forward his cancelled check, or a copy thereof, with the above requested information.\n\nDistribution:\n\n[Name] - Mexico City\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\n\n[Date] 15 January 1964\n\n[Office]\n\n[Office]\n\n[Office]\n\n[Office]\nSECRET 3822457\nDIR INFO PALO CITE MEXI 2132\nDNDORIC OXOPERA\nREF A MEXI 2073\nB DIR 75171\n\nTICHBORN HAS SO MANY COMMITMENTS FOR SPECIFIC TIMES BY LETTER, ETC. TO VARIOUS PEOPLE ON THIS TRIP IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO REVERSE HIMSELF NOW AND RESCHEDULE. ASSUMING LUND WILL BE PRESENT IN MEXI FOR SEVERAL WEEKS, TICHBORN COULD TOUCH BASE WITH LUND ON MORNING 23 JAN WHEN HE WILL BE BACK IN MEXI.\n\nIF OK WITH LUND.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFM\n\nSECRET\n\nTICHBORN\n\nDec 25 1963\nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND REVIEW\n\nTO: WH/1 -- J. Halliwell\nFROM: CHIEF, CI/DA /jul, L\u00e1zaro C. Gonz\u00e1lez\nSUBJECT: C - 77119\n\nIN ORDER THAT FURTHER CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN YOUR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW, OR REVIEW INFORMATION AS INDICATED.\n\nPRO 1\nPRO 2\nFIELD TRACES\nRI TRACES\nOPERATIONAL AND DIVISION TRACES\nRESULTS OF TECHNICAL INTERROGATION\nGREEN LIST\n\nNOTICE: FIRST SECOND XX THIRD AND FINAL\n\nREMARKS:\n\nSince the original traces were run in 1959, and in light of questionable information developed, it is requested that a new 772 request for amendment with updating of all traces and new Green List request be submitted. On the 772, please supply full details of use by the Mexico City Station.\n\nAn updating of the biographic data submitted in 1959 will facilitate matters.\n\nWH/1 is again reminded that no Operational Approval for use exists at this time.  \n\nUnless appropriate action is taken within 30 days, this case will be closed.\n\n201-253203\nIN HQS DISCUSSIONS WITH TICHBORN IT TENTATIVELY AGREED THAT\nEARLY DECEMBER 1964 MIGHT BE A SUITABLE TIME FOR TICHBORN VISIT DOMREP\nTO MAKE ASSESSMENT OF REID'S PUBLIC IMAGE AND RECOMMENDATIONS HOW TO\nIMPROVE SAME. HOWEVER, IN VIEW EXCELLENT AND THOROUGH ASSESSMENT ALONG\nSIMILAR LINES PROVIDED BY RECENT JNTUBA REPRESENTATIVES HQS CONSIDERS\nDESIRABLE THAT VISIT BY TICHBORN SHOULD BE MADE AT APPROPRIATE LATER\nDATE AND WITH MORE SHARPLY DEFINED OBJECTIVES. WILL ADVISE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n| TO: | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|-----|------|---------------------|----------|\n| 1.  |      |                     | 1. Please att to base dc. HNMA-24860 in 201-253203 which we on file. Charge to your office. |\n| 2.  |      |                     |          |\n| 3.  |      |                     |          |\n| 4.  |      |                     |          |\n| 5.  |      |                     |          |\n| 6.  |      |                     |          |\n| 7.  |      |                     |          |\n| 8.  |      |                     |          |\n| 9.  |      |                     |          |\n| 10. |      |                     |          |\n| 11. |      |                     |          |\n| 12. |      |                     |          |\n| 13. |      |                     |          |\n| 14. |      |                     |          |\n| 15. |      |                     |          |\n\n**SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:**\n- POCO does not have original copy of dispatch. Please locate dispatch and forward to us for 6201 file.\n- Libby, POCO 64135\n- Someone suggested the number should be HNMA, Mexico City.\n| TO: (Office designation, room number, and building) | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Mark each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |\n|--------------------------------------------------|------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| 1. DCO/CO/2nd Lt. Allen | 1/30/19 | | The original copy is lost if it is not in your file while it should be. |\n| 2. | | | |\n| 3. | | | |\n| 4. | | | |\n| 5. | | | |\n| 6. | | | |\n| 7. | | | |\n| 8. | | | |\n| 9. | | | |\n| 10. | | | |\n| 11. | | | |\n| 12. | | | |\n| 13. | | | |\n| 14. | | | |\n| 15. | | | |\n**DISPATCH**\n\n**CLASSIFICATION**\n\n**SECRET**\n\n**TO**\n\nChief, WHD\n\n**INFO.**\n\nChief, KUWOLF\n\n**FROM**\n\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\n**SUBJECT**\n\nGeneral - Operational/Specific - Edward G. TICHBORN Letter of Resignation to William D. KIMROY.\n\n**REFERENCE:** MEXI-1745, dated 25 November 1964\n\nForwarded as a separate cover attachment to this dispatch is a copy of the letter which TICHBORN prepared and forwarded to KIMROY on 25 November 1964.\n\nStewart R. Patchen\nfor\nWillard C. Curtis\n\n**Attachment:**\n\n1. As Stated (ENDER SEPARATE COVER)  CS COPY\n\n**Distribution:**\n\n- 2 - WHD w/att u/s/c\n- 1 - KUWOLF w/att u/s/c\n- 4 - Files\n\n**CROSS REFERENCE TO**\n\n| DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER | DATE |\n|----------------------------|------|\n| IBDA-24860                 | 1 Dec 64 |\n\n**CLASSIFICATION**\n\n**SECRET**\n\n**MICROFILM**\n\n**NO INDEXING REQUIRED**\n\n**MARKED FOR INDEXING**\n\n**ONLY QUALIFIED DESK CAN JUDGE INDEXING**\n\n**ACTION REQUIRED - REFERENCES**\n\n**261 - 25-3-603**\nDear Mr. Thomas:\n\nDue to increased demands upon my time from other clients, I find it necessary to relinquish my duties as legal counsel for the ILR here in Mexico, and I do so with great reluctance. One of my heretofore-lesser clients has recently expanded his activities in certain real estate developments in Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta, thereby necessitating frequent absence from Mexico City. Then, too, I had underestimated the amount of time and effort required to satisfactorily attend the various legal and administrative matters confronting CEDS. Should you so desire, I could recommend other legal counsel; but I am inclined to feel that the Centro's principal problems would be of an administrative nature rather than a legal one.\n\nAs for my legal fees to date, I am submitting a bill for $650.00 U.S. Cts. This represents a total of 65 hours at the rate of $10.00 per hour. My regular fees amount to $20.00 per hour, but, in keeping with my own political affinity for labor causes, I have reduced them to the lesser figure.\n\nMay I thank you again for your confidence and good will in having chosen me as legal counsel for your organization's activities in Mexico. I shall be happy to give you a personal report of my observations on my next trip to New York.\n\nSincerely yours,\n\nHenry P. Lopez\n\nCS COPY\n\n8274  H. 24860  201-853 303\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Contract Personnel Division\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN\n\nPlease extend for a period of one year with the following amendment the present contract of Edward G. TICHBORN, which was due to expire 18 November 1964:\n\n\"Increase in basic compensation to $12,000 per annum effective 1 December 1964; and additional compensation of $1,500.00 Collyrs for full time services rendered in June, July and August of 1964.\"\n\nDesmond Fitzgerald\nChief\nWestern Hemisphere Division\n\nDDP/WH/DF/CRHalliwell:kte (20 November 1964)\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 1 - Addressee\n1 - WH/Personnel\n1 - WH/1/Mexico (201-\n1 - WH/1/Mexico Memo file\n1 - WH/Registry\n\nDec 25 1964\nSECRET 121750 Z\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 1558\n\nLICOLIC\n\nREF A DIR 63360\n\nB MEXI-QTO-1559\n\nCONCUR ALTHOUGH REF B MAY ALTER SOME CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED.\n\nSECRET\n\nCFN\n\nAND RECORD IN C/5 AS OF 1500, 12 NOV 64.\n\n** RE TICHBORN CONTRACT. SECRET\n\n201-253203\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH-8\nINFO: R/AN, CA/04, CO2, OP2, OF3, VR, B/CEN\n\nTO: MEXI\nINFO: 63360\nCITE DIR\n\nETC/LOCIC\n\nREF: IMMA 24353\n\n1. EDWARD G. TICHIBORN DISCUSSED TERMS HIS KUBARK CONTRACT DURING VISIT HQS EARLY NOVEMBER. HQS AGREES PRESENT KRRXRR EXPIRING CONTRACT CALLED FOR ABOUT TWO-THIRDS SUBJ'S TIME. TICHIBORN POINTED OUT PER REFERENCE HE NOW ENGAGED NINETY PERCENT TIME FOR KUBARK.\n\n2. SUBJECT STATION CONCURRENCE HQS RECOMMENDS NEW ONE-YEAR KRRXRRR CONTRACT PROVIDE RAISE FROM $9000 TO $13000 PLUS $3000 QUANTERS PER ANNUM. ALSO LUMP SUM PAYMENT 1500 DOLLARS FOR COMPENSATION HIS RECENT FULL TIME SERVICE FUASPEN. ADVISE IF YOU CONCUR EXTEND HIS CONTRACT ONE YEAR EFFECTIVE 19 NOVEMBER.\n\n3. HQS TOLD TICHIBORN WE CONSIDERED HIS SERVICES VALUABLE AS WELL AS HIS EVER-MILLINGNESS DEPART ON SHORT NOTICE ASSIGNMENTS OTHER DIVISION AREAS. OBVIOUSLY THIS PROPOSED RAISE WITH WHICH SUBJECT WOULD BE MOST HAPPY SINCE STILL IMPOSES NO RESTRICTIONS ON HIS SOMETIME OUTSIDE LEGAL WORK, WILL BE WITH UNDERSTANDING HE CONTINUE DEVOTE NEAR FULL-TIME MANAGEMENT AND HANDLING ORRINE AND ORMANTLE PLUS OTHER STATION ASSIGNMENTS.\n\nCONTINUED 201-253203\n4. DISPATCH FOLLOWS ON QRMINE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND REVIEW\n\nTO: WH/1 - J. Hallwall\n\nFROM: CHIEF, CI/OA\n\nSUBJECT: L/C Edward P. Brown\n\nLOPEZ, Henry P.\n\nIN ORDER THAT FURTHER CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN YOUR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW, OR REVIEW INFORMATION AS INDICATED.\n\n| PROJ | REVIEW OF STAFF/O OFFICE |\n|------|--------------------------|\n| PROJ II | REVIEW OF STAFF/O COLLATERAL INFORMATION |\n| FIELD TRACES | REVIEW OF SECURITY OFF. REPORT AT CI/OA |\n| HI TRACES | REVIEW OF SEC. OFF. CONCURRENCE MEMO AT CI/OA |\n| OPERATIONAL AND DIVISION TRACES | REVIEW OF FBI REPORT AT CI/OA |\n| RESULTS OF TECHNICAL INTERROGATION | REVIEW OF ATTACHED REFERENCE |\n| CHECK LIST | OTHERS (See Remarks) |\n\nNOTICE: FIRST | SECOND | THIRD AND FINAL\n\nREMARKS:\n\nIf it is still your intention to utilize Subject, please comply with CI/OA memorandum of 30 September 1964. You will note that original OA was granted to PP/PAD in 1959; therefore, in essence, no approval exists on Subject.\n1. BELIEVE 3 OR 4 NOW GOOD DATES FOR WINTERROD TICHBORN MEETING NEXT. WILL CONFIRM WITH TICHBORN WHEN HE VISITS HQS.\n\n2. PER REP B PARA 3: HUYETTE NOW BELIEVES THAT QRMANGER SHOULD REOPEN CORRESPONDENCE WITH DTGODOWN. SUGGEST TICHBORN PROMPT QRMANGER TO SEND HUYETTE COPY QRMANTLE WITH COVERING LETTER SUGGESTING NEW YORK MEETING. THEN HUYETTE COULD RESPOND, WITHOUT APPEARING OVER EAGER, ALONG SPECIFIC LINES NOTED REP B.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n[Signature]\n\nRobert L. Larrabee\nC/CA/13\n\nREPRODUCTION AT OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 2322322\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 1396\n\nREFS A MEXI 1219 (93/63)\n\nB DIR 53655\n\nC DIR 56520\n\n1. TICHBORN ETA WASH NOW OCT 25 AND WILL MAKE CONTACT INDICATED REF B.\n\n2. ASIDE FROM GENERAL DISCUSSIONS ON ORMINE AND ORMANTLE TICHBORN EXPECTED TO DISCUSS FOLLOW SPECIFIC ITEMS:\n   A. LIMULAX CONTRACT AND CHANGE IN COVER FUNDING FOR ORMINE.\n   LIMULAX STILL WANTS BETTER ASSURANCE THAN DIAACOON AS SIGNATORY TO CONTRACT AND, IN ANY EVENT, WOULD LIKE SIGNED COPY OF CONTRACT.\n   (ALL COPIES POUCHED TO MHS). TICHBORN TOLD TO BRING SIGNED COPY BACK WITH HIM FROM PBPRIME IF ALL POSSIBLE TO TAKE SOME HEAT OFF THIS ISSUE.\n   B. JUAN BOSCH BOOK SINCE LIMULAX SUGGESTING HANDLING PUBLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION SOMEWHAT DIFFERENTLY THAN ORIGINALLY CONTEMPLATED AND STATION NOT CERTAIN COMPATIBLE WITH PRESENT ARRANGEMENTS ON FINANCING IT.\n   C. TICHBORN CONTRACT PER HMNA-24353.\n\n3. TICHBORN SENT LETTER TO THOMAS, BRINGING PROSPECTUS, AND THREE COPIES ORMANTLE AIRMAILED PER REF C.\n\nSECRET\n\n2001064 96921\n\n253203\nSECRET 201610Z\nMEXI INFO DIR-CITE PALP 2532\n\nDIDORIC QKOFERA\n\nREF MEXI 1219 (10-93163) A\n\n1. RE PARA 2 REF, WINTERROOD WOULD PREFER 3-4 NOV. WILL CONTACT STATION FIRST AS PLANNED AND STATION CAN ARRANGE MEETING WITH TICHBORN.\n\n2. NO INDEX.\n\nSECRET\n\n# QUERIED IF TICHBORN COULD SEE WINTERROOD ON U.S. TRIP OR ON RETURN TO MEXI 3 OR 4 NOV.\nREFERENCE: HMA-24450 dated 8 Oct 64.\n\n1. As Headquarters is aware, Edward G. TICHBORN is in Mexico on a tourist visa and with a number of \"associations\" (i.e., law firm in PBPRIME, TV and movie contacts in Mexico) which have sufficed to provide satisfactory superficial cover for his presence and activities here up to this time. However, he has been here long enough now and made enough trips to other Latin American countries where a continuation of this tourist status and present cover arrangements should be changed for something more substantial. All of this became apparent when he began to try to obtain his working papers. TICHBORN's profession, of course, is that of a lawyer, but he cannot practice this profession in Mexico under Mexican law. Therefore, to find a peg for working paper approval, something else had to be found. None of his numerous present cover associations or stories had enough substance to provide a sufficiently plausible basis for working papers. The corporation being created for the QRMANTLE activity under the cover story being used (e.g., fairly affluent PBPRIME interested in culture and intellectuals trying to get something of the QRMANTLE nature started and then, interest PBPRIME foundations in picking it up) will not support an application for working papers. As a result, the Station and TICHBORN were casting about for something else with more depth and durability.\n\n(continued)\n\nAttachment:\n1. Identity (UNDERSEPARATE COVER)\n\nDistribution:\n- 2 - WHD w/att u/a/c\n- 1 - KUWOLF w/att u/a/c\n- 3 - Files\n\nCROSS REFERENCE TO\nHMA-24450\nDATE 13 Oct 64\nCLASSIFICATION SECRET\nFILE NUMBER 50-6-118/2\nFFN: 1-4277\n2. During the week of 27 September, an old friend of TICHBORN's, Identity A, came up with the following proposition:\n\na. Identity A owns Identity B which operates out of Mexico City and distributes PBRIHE shows dubbed into Spanish throughout the Caribbean and South American area. The business has been in existence for some time and, according to TICHBORN, is thriving. Identity A said that his business had reached a point where he needed legal assistance of various types, but was not prepared to turn it over to just any local lawyer since it involved a wide range of problems.\n\nb. Identity A, who knew from conversations with TICHBORN that the latter was thinking about getting Mexican working papers, made an offer to TICHBORN. He said that he would provide TICHBORN with office space and telephone in his present office area in downtown Mexico City on Reforma if TICHBORN would just advise him on what local lawyers to see on these various legal problems and act as a very general legal advisor to him on dealings with these people. He and TICHBORN figured this would take, perhaps, 5% of the latter's time. Further, and most important, Identity A said he would provide the basis with Identity B for TICHBORN obtaining his working papers. For various reasons, however, Identity A desired an answer right away (within several days).\n\n3. The Station checked out Identity A in Station files and found that there had been some previous traffic on him in the period, 1957-61: HOC-11-334 dated 19 December 1957; HMM-A-9445 dated 12 February 1958; DIR-40866 dated 20 May 1961; DIR-41304 dated 22 May 1961; DIR-41303 dated 23 May 1961; DIR-41298 dated 23 May 1961; and MEXI-8095 dated 23 May 1961. As will be noted, the May 1961 traffic concerned TICHBORN coming to Mexico and being employed as legal counsel to Identity A. (This never really reached fruition although TICHBORN used an association with Identity A, which was never more than close social contact and an interest in show business, as one of his various cover stories.) In all this traffic, there was not any derogatory information developed on Identity A. Therefore, the Station on strength of the timing required and this previous traffic told TICHBORN to go ahead with the arrangement since it is not only essential for his local activities, but will provide him with stronger and readily-available cover for any further Latin American trips (i.e., FUASPEH) he might be required to make. TICHBORN has been told, to transact an absolute minimum of his business for KUBARK at this office on his regular projects. (e.g., QRMIHE and QRMASTLE).\n\n4. Hopefully, this will also straighten out the working papers problem on some sort of rational basis in the near future.\n\n[Signature]\n\nfor\n\nWillard C. CURTIS\nSECRET\n\nSeparate Cover Attachment 41 to -\n\nHMAA-24457\n\nIdentity A - John Nichols MANSON III\n\nIdentity B - Magnum TV and Mark IV Productions\n| FROM: | RID/67 |\n|-------|--------|\n| TO: | RID/67 |\n| ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n| 1. | C/0/11 |  |\n| 2. |  |  |\n| 3. |  |  |\n| 4. |  |  |\n| 5. |  |  |\n| 6. |  |  |\n| 7. |  |  |\n| 8. |  |  |\n| 9. |  |  |\n| 10. | RID/67 |  |\n| 11. |  |  |\n| 12. | RID/67 |  |\n| 13. |  |  |\n| 14. |  |  |\n| 15. |  |  |\n| 16. |  |  |\n| 17. | RID/67 |  |\n\n**TO: ACTION BRANCH**\n\nIf file no. and title shown are not proper, insert proper file no. below and forward document to RID/AN.\n\n**TO: ALL ADDRESSEES**\n\nFill in Section 1 on back, if appropriate.\n\n**COMMENTS**\n\n- Your recommendation for subject and content.\n- For information only.\n\n**FED PROCESSING FILE NUMBER**\n\n50-6/16/3\n\n**NOTE:**\n\nThe file is not to be opened by the DIA. It is to be opened by the DIA only if the DIA has been notified of the contents of the file and has been authorized to open the file by the DIA.\nREFERENCE: HOMA-24352, dated 22 September 1964.\n\n1. As probably can be discerned from previous communications on this subject, the Station has never been too certain about the original understandings with Subject on his relationship with KUBARK. At least some understandings have been supplementary to the formal contract (such as his availability for extended trips to Latin American areas in election periods). This is no complaint on the part of the Station, but merely a prelude to a matter which the Station brought up with TICHBORN in connection with his intellectual magazine and QRMINE activities.\n\n2. It has been the Station's inference, from talking to TICHBORN as well as communications on other aspects of his relationship with KUBARK not covered in his contract, that he is not to be considered a full-time contract agent. In other words, he has outside activities in the legal and other fields here which it was understood would provide additional income to him at the time he entered into his original relationship with KUBARK. As can be discerned from his biographic data, he has operated at a level and enjoyed an income outlook that would not be satisfied by the present contractual arrangements on salary. It has become obvious to the Station, however, that if he is to handle, properly, present requirements being imposed on him by the Station a very high percentage of his available time is going to be involved.\n\n(continued)\n3. Taking all the foregoing into consideration and to avoid complications with his present projects or TICHBORN, the Station asked him what understanding he had on the proportion of his time to be devoted to KUBARK activities. He said that his present contract was predicated on approximately 60 to be 2/3 of his time being utilized by KUBARK. His present estimate is that he is devoting 85 to 90% of his time to KUBARK activities; and, if he is to do the kind of job that is desired on the two intellectual projects recently acquired, he will sustain that percentage. Of course, he continues to be available for appropriate election of political assignments (such as FUASPE) in other countries from time to time; but, it has to be recognized that when he is absent from Mexico, this represents 100% of his time.\n\n4. The Station agrees with his analysis on current commitments against his time on behalf of KUBARK. Therefore, it was indicated to TICHBORN that he should be prepared to take up this matter with Headquarters at the time he makes his late October trip to PEPRIKE in connection with the new intellectual magazine (see reference) and that the Station would request Headquarters to be prepared to discuss the matter at that time. It is the Station's understanding that his present contract extension expires 19 November 1964.\n\n5. The Station would like to emphasize that this matter was brought up at its initiative in order to try (a) to assure that demands being placed on TICHBORN recently could be reasonably expected to be fulfilled and (b) to get a complete understanding on all aspects of TICHBORN's contractual status (written and unwritten) so that neither the Station nor TICHBORN get committed to these continuing activities and suddenly find themselves in contention about the time/salary involved. It should also be emphasized that TICHBORN has not complained about recent requirements, but has devoted whatever time required to handle them and do the job expected.\n\n[Signature]\nfor\nWillard C. CURTIS\nReference: HPMW-12847, 21 August 1964\n\nEdward G. TICHBORN's contract should be renewed. Station is awaiting his return from Chile to discuss possible changes, which will be forwarded as soon as possible.\n\n[Signature]\nfor\nWillard G. CURTIS\n\nDistribution:\n\n- WHD\n- Files\n\nCS COPY\n\n201-253203\n\n4 September 1964\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief WH Division\n\nSubject: 1963 Covert Income Tax Returns\n\nACTION REQUIRED: REFERENCES\n\nPRIORITY\n\n1. According to the records in the Office of Finance, the following named individuals have failed to file the required Covert Income Tax returns for 1963. Since the due date for Income Tax Returns is 15 April for individuals physically present in PEPRIME on that date and 15 June for individuals who are abroad on 15 April, all of the following individuals are now delinquent with respect to their PEPRIME Income Tax responsibilities:\n\n   Otto BAHNQUIST  Mexico GOA\n   LIBBY - 1  Mexico GOA\n   Philip K. TESSAROLO  Project LIEBROSS\n   Edward G. TICHBORN  Project LICOLIC\n\n2. It is requested that steps be taken to procure the outstanding tax returns as soon as possible since delinquent tax returns are subject to 6% statutory interest on the unpaid tax due from 15 April to date of payment and in addition are also subject to a penalty of 5% per month (not to exceed 25% of the tax liability) for failure to file tax returns.\n\nChester D. DAISOLD\n\nDistribution:\nGrig & 1 COG, Mexico City\n\n26/25/3263\n\n4 September 1964\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, WH/1\n\nSUBJECT: 1963 Covert Income Tax Returns\n\n1. According to the records in the Compensation and Tax Division, Office of Finance, the following named individuals are required to file Covert Income Tax Returns for 1963, but have failed to do so to date. The due date for Income Tax Returns is 15 April for individuals physically present in the United States on that date and 15 June for individuals who are abroad on 15 April. Therefore, all of the following listed individuals are now delinquent with respect to their U.S. Income Tax responsibilities:\n\n   Otto HAGGARQUIST  Mexico OCA\n   LIBUFT/1  Mexico OCA\n   Philip K. TESSAROLO  Project LIMBOSS\n   Edward G. TICHBORN  Project LICOLIC\n\n2. It is requested that steps be taken to procure the outstanding tax returns as soon as possible since delinquent tax returns are subject to 6% statutory interest on the unpaid tax due from 15 April to date of payment and in addition are also subject to a penalty of 5% per month, not to exceed 25% of the tax liability, for failure to file tax returns.\n\n3. It is also requested that WH/2 be furnished with a copy of any correspondence going to the Field with respect to this subject.\n\n   Desmond Fitzgerald\n   Chief\n   Western Hemisphere Division\nSubject's contract will expire 18 November 1964. Please advise by return dispatch whether the contract should be renewed and if any changes are desired.\n\nChester D. DAINOLD\n\nDistribution:\nOkl - COS, Mexico City\nSECRET 122282\nSAGO INFO DIR CITE MEXI 3553\nFUASPE\nEDWARD G. TICHBORN ETA LIMA 0700 17 AUG AND ETA SANTIAGO 1130\n17 AUG VIA CANADIAN PACIFIC. CHECKED FLIGHT SCHEDULES FROM ANTOFAGASTA\nAND FEARS STOPOVER THERE CAN TIE HIM UP THREE DAYS. IF STOPOVER\nDESIRED ANYWAY PLS INFORM MEXI BY COB 15 AUG.\nSECRET\n\n[Handwritten note: Tichborn's 201]\nPAY TICHBORN $993.30 EFFECTIVE PAY PERIOD ENDING 31 MAY 1964.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: STATION REQUESTS AMOUNT FIELD SALARY TO PAY TICHBORN.\nFUASPEX TICHBORN\n\nREF: MEXI 9577 (IN 88422)\nSAGO 7034 (IN 89145)\n\n1. CONCUR TICHBORN MAKE ARRANGEMENTS PER PARA 1 B REF.\n\n2. TICHBORN IDENTIFYING HIMSELF AS HENRY SHOULD CONTACT WALLACE R. PARLETT AS SOON AS HE ARRIVES NEW YORK TO SET UP BRIEFING IN WASH NOT LATER THAN 28 MAY. TICHBORN COULD LEAVE FOR SAGO ON 29 MAY. PARLETT'S OFFICE EXTENSION IS 6868. HOME NUMBER IS IN VIRGINIA SECTION OF WASH DIRECTORY.\n\n3. FOR SAGO: IN ORDER TO AVOID OVERLAPS AND CROSSING OF LINES IT IMPORTANT STICK TO CONCEPT, TICHBORN'S UTILIZATION PER REF B.I.E., HE WILL BE STATION EYES AND EARS BUT NOT BECOME INVOLVED IN ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN FOR INDEPENDENTS OR OTHER ELEMENTS.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: *REF RYBAT.\n\nDESMOND FITZGERALD\nC/WH/3\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nGERARD DROLL\nC/WH/2\nAUTHORIZING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 220357Z\nDIR INFO SAGO CITE MEXI 9577\n\nREF DIR 22437 &\n\n1. TICHBORN PREPARED LEAVE FOR SAGO WEEKEND 30-31 MAY. SOME\nPROBLEMS INVOLVED BUT NOT INSURMOUNTABLE:\n\nA. TICHBORN HAS NUMBER COMMITMENTS INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL MAGAZINE\nTRYING TO GET OFF GROUND. MEXI EDITOR AND NUMEROUS OTHER MEXI\nINTELLECTUALS ALREADY BEING PULLED INTO EFFORT. NUMBER PEOPLE\nALREADY BEING CONTACTED FOR ARTICLES, ETC. SO FAR GONE IN THIS THAT\nCANNOT BACK OUT OR DEFER LAUNCHING MAGAZINE WITHOUT KILLING TICHBORN\nWITH LEFTIST INTELLECTUAL AND OTHER CIRCLES HERE FOR GOOD. FURTHER,\nAT THIS STAGE, WILL NEED BADLY TICHBORN GUIDANCE IN ORDER TO KEEP EFFORT\nFROM GOING AWAY. THEREFORE, TICHBORN WILL HAVE TO MAINTAIN SOME KIND\nOF INTERIM CONTACT WITH THIS. PROBABLY CAN BE HANDLED BY MAIL THRU HIS\nWIFE, BUT VERY POSSIBLE HE WOULD NEED MAKE ONE OR TWO VERY SHORT\nTRIPS BACK TO MEXI DURING SOME PART OF THIS PERIOD FOR THIS PURPOSE\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nCopy No.\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nAND SOME OF THIS PRIVATE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WHICH HE CANNOT JUST DROP FOR PERIOD. THIS COULD BE ARRANGED AT TIME DEEMED BEST BY SAGO AND TICHBORN CONSIDERING ALL FACTORS.\n\nB. TICHBORN COVER UP TO THIS POINT ON MUCH SHORTER TRIPS HAS BEEN INTEREST IN LOS ANGELES MOVIE COMPANY AND SOME SHORT TERM MOVIE INTEREST IN AREA TO WHICH HE WENT. HOWEVER, DO NOT BELIEVE THIS WOULD SATISFY TWO TO THREE MONTH STAY. TICHBORN SUGGESTED IDEN 1 WHOSE INTERESTS HE ACTUALLY REPRESENTING AS LAWYER TRYING FIND INVESTORS, ETC. THIS COULD INVOLVE SURVEY TRIP TO LATIN AMERICA ON ITS BEHALF WITH LETTER FROM IDEN 2 WHO REMAIN UNWITTING. THIS COULD BE LAID ON BY TICHBORN AT TIME HE MAKES SCHEDULED 27 MAY BUSINESS TRIP TO NEW YORK. SINCE IDEN 1 LOCATED WASHINGTON, HE SEE IDEN 2 EASILY AT THAT TIME, GET LETTER, AND ALSO ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR BRIEFING HIS MIGHT DESIRE GIVE. THEN, HE COULD LEAVE FROM WASHINGTON FOR SAGO ON WEEKEND.\n\n2. ADVISE.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHETHER EDWARD G. TICHBORN AVAILABLE 2-3 MONTH TOY SAGO BEGINNING ASAP.\nSECRET 220353Z\nDIR INFO SAGO CITE MEXI 9578\n\nDESENSITIZED\nREF MEXI 9577 (MT 54422)\n\nIDEN 1 - SOCIEDAD ANONIMA DE LUZ Y FUERZA ELECTRICA INTER-AMERICANA,\nWASHINGTON, D.C. NEW COMPANY IN FORMATIVE STAGE.\nIDEN 2 - CARLOS MCCORMICK, PRESIDENT OF SALFEI.\nSECRET\n13 May 1964\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Contract Personnel Division\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN\n\nPlease extend for a period of six (6) months the present contract of Edward G. TICHBORN which was due to expire on 18 May 1964.\n\nW. E. Brooks\nC/WH/Support\n1. As indicated in Ref B in mid-1962, it was station understanding until fairly recently that Tichborn's primary mission here was to be available for election and other political action assignments in hemisphere for, if need be, extended periods of time. In so many words, he assigned here for base operations with Mexico having right use him within those limitations. Obviously, Mexico could not saddle him with normal amount of projects requiring routine and assured management under these conditions. However, used him for number one-shot and temporary assignments plus initiating and handling project Lifizz which as much as station felt could be done without tying him down too much. Ref C in mid-1963 apparently recognized that station was using him somewhat more than originally contemplated. Project Licolic noted he would not be handling intellectual journal project. Project Lifizz or some replacement, plus remaining available for short-duration political action assignments in other areas.\nIF DRACOON PUBLISHING CENTER CONTACTS IDES (WHICH PERFECTLY\nAGREEABLE TO STATION), THEN APPEARS TO STATION THAT TICHEBORN WILL\nHAVE SUFFICIENT TO KEEP HIM BUSY. BELIEVE HGS. WILL AGREE WITH\nTICHEBORN CONTACTS AND PAST HISTORY HERE WITH LEFTIST INTELLECTUAL\nTYPES THIS IS FIELD MOST SUITABLE FOR HIM AND NO POINT IN TRYING\nTO PUCK STRAIGHT PROPAGANDA OR YOUTH STUDENT OPERATIONS TO HIM.\nHE QUITE VALUABLE AND HAS UNIQUE CAPABILITY THIS FIELD AND IS GIVEN\nNUMBER ASSIGNMENTS BY STATION WHICH WOULD FIND DIFFICULT\nSATISFY WITH ANYONE ELSE: FOR EXAMPLE, CULTIVATING CEDRIC BELFRAGE\nAND GETTING HIS VIEWPOINTS ON HIS CUBAN VISIT OF SOME DURATION.\n\n2. BASED ON FOREGOING, STATION RECOMMENDS THAT PRESENT CONTRACT\nARRANGEMENT REMAIN IN EFFECT SINCE STATION MOVING HIM INTO APPROPRIATE\nACTIVITIES AS OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF AND HE BEING KEPT BUSY.\n(STATION HAS AVERAGE THREE MEETINGS WEEK WITH HIM).\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: *CONCERNED HGS REVIEW OF PROJECT LICOLIC.\nSECRET 688121Z\nDIR CITE NEXI 2349\nLCFLUTTER\nREF DIR 19396 Y\n\n1. AGREE TEST THOSE NAMED REF EXCEPT LIMOTOR 19 WHO TESTED OCT 63, LIMORE WHO CASE OFFICER FEELS UNDER NO OBLIGATION BE TESTED AND WOULD BE ALIENATED.\n\n2. STATION NOT NOW IN CONTACT WITH LIKAYAK 20. HOPE ESTABLISH CONTACT SOON TO GET FEEL OF LIKAYAK 2 ALTER E30. ONCE THIS DONE AGREE LCFLUTTER DESIRABLE.\n\n3. WISH ADD UMPSTAL TO LIST.\n\n4. ADVISE TEAM ITINERARY.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: REQUESTED CABLE WHETHER STA CONCURS LCFLUTTER CANDIDATES.\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: W/H 8\nINFO: CI/6A, OS 2, VR, FE 6\n\nLCFLUTTER\n\nREF: MEXI 9284* (IN 73450)\n\n1. EDS3 SUGGESTS STATION CONSIDER LCFLUTTER FOR FOLLOWING:\n   A. LIMOPZ-1 AND 2 BECAUSE OF STPESO SECURITY.\n   B. CARRIER AND CONTRACT AGENTS WHO HAVE NEVER BEEN\n      FLUTTERED: CLACKETT, WIMPHEN, WILSTED, REHABUR, TICHERN.\n      PREPARED, LIMAYAK-2 AND 30, LIMOPZ-16.\n   C. BELIEVE RIZON AND SIMONCINI WHO PREVIOUSLY\n      FLUTTERED SHOULD BE REFLUTTERED.\n   D. LIMOPZ-2, LIMHNET, AND LITTLE BECAUSE OF\n      SECURITY OF SENSITIVE OPS.\n\n2. CABLE WHETHER STATION CONCURS ON ALL OR HOW MANY SO\n   KUBODA CAN PLAN TRIP ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR INTERVIEWS.\n3. FOR APPROVED TO LCFLUTTER LIMAYAK-16.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n[Signature: Include Service's suggestions for issuance.\n\n[Signature: Phone]\n\n[Signature: Draft]\n\n[Signature: Approval]\n\n[Signature: Coordination]\n\n[Signature: Authentication]\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n\nCopy No. 253203\nSECRET\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\n\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\n\nACTION: CA/O 4*(CA/O COPY SLOTTED AT 2045 15 APR BP)\n\nINFO: CA 2, CA/PEG, CA/PROP, CI/OPS, CI/OA, WH 7, VR\n\nSECRET-1522252\n\nPRIORITY LIR GUAT CITE MEX1 9020 (EASY ACTING)\n\nREF A GUAT 3836(15 62001)\n\nB DIP 14135 (NOT SHT GUAT)\n\n1. TICHBORN PRESENTLY OUT OF TOWN, BUT RETURNS 17 APR. HE TRYING\nGET REF 8 OFF GROUND, SO THIS NOT BEST TIME FOR ABSENCE. HOWEVER,\nASSUME TRIP WOULD BE FOR WEEK OR LESS AND IF THIS GENERAL\nTIMING SATISFACTORY WITH ALL CONCERNED, CAN RELEASE SOON AS TRAVEL\nCAN BE ARRANGED. ADVISE.\n\n2. NO INDEX.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: *ACTION UNIT DETERMINED AS THOUGH INDICATOR DTOORIC USED.\n\n**REQUESTED TIME SCHEDULE FOR TICHBORN.\n\n201-253203\nSECRET 2017382\n\nDIR INFO PALT CITE MEXI 6739 (EASY ACTING)\n\nSTORIC QXOPERA\n\nREF DIR 36971\n\n1. LAST MEETING TECHBORN (T) HAD WITH XIRAU (X) ABOUT FOUR WEEKS AGO. BUT THEREAFTER HAS BEEN AVOIDING HIM-SINCE CANNOT GO BEYOND STATE EXPRESSION STRONG INTEREST UNTIL GO-THRU SOME DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN T AND X NARROWED FACT X FEELS NEEDS ASSURANCE CONTINUITY AND SECURITY IN JOURNAL VENTURE PRIOR ABANDONING OTHER SIDE INCOME POSSIBILITIES TO DEVOTE TIME AND EFFORT REQUIRED JOURNAL. THIS INFERS SALARY FOR X WHICH T THINKS WILL NEED BE FIVE TO SIX HUNDRED DOLLAR RANGE PER MONTH ONCE PROJECT UNDERTAKEN T FEELS CAN GET X WORK WITH HIM ON PRELIMINARY COST STUDIES AND OTHER DATA FOR REIMBURSEMENT X'S TIME AND WHATEVER OTHER COSTS INVOLVED WITHOUT NECESSITY ANY LONG-TERM COMMITMENT. T ESTIMATES THIS TAKE AT LEAST TWO WEEKS AT TOTAL COST $700 (U.S.). THIS MUST BE DONE TO GET ENOUGH PRELIMINARY DETAIL FOR PROJECT SUBMISSION.\n\n2. IN ADDITION, TWO OTHER PRELIMINARIES SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN SOONEST:\n\nA. INITIATE ACTION FOR T'S MEXICAN WORKING PAPERS WHICH REQUIRED\nBEFORE WE CAN SERVE IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY WITH JOURNAL OR JOURNAL\nCORPORATE MECHANISM TO BE SET UP. THIS TAKES ABOUT MONTH IF NO\nHITCHES AND COST ESTIMATED $628(U.S.) IN \"GRATUITIES\" FOR VARIOUS\nMEXICAN OFFICIALS INCLUDING INCIDENTAL TAX AND LEGAL FEES.\n\nB. START CORPORATION PAPERS. PLAN IS FOR I HAVE LAW FIRM\nHANDLE INCORPORATION IN FIRM'S NAME FOR SILENT CLIENT WHICH UNDERSTAND\nIS COMMON PRACTICE HERE. STOCK CERTIFICATES TO BE BEARER TYPE AND\nTO BE HELD BY I FOR ASSURED CONTROL. ESTIMATE WILL REQUIRE AT LEAST MONTH\nIF NO SNAGS AND COST $180(U.S.) INCLUDING REQUIRED\nGRATUITIES. CORPORATE CAPITAL REQUIRED IS $4,000(U.S.) WHICH MUST\nBE OF DEPOSIT WITH BANK FOR MEXI AUTHORITIES.\nVERIFICATION AT TIME INCORPORATION BUT MAY BE SPENT ANYWAY DESIRED\nAFTER INCORPORATION OR IF PROJECT DOES NOT GO THROUGH MAY BE WITHDRAWN\nFROM BANK AND RETURNED KUBARK. I'S STORY TO LAW FIRM WILL BE HE\nSTARTING CORPORATION AS FLYER IN CULTURAL FIELD NOT ONLY SINCE\nFILLS IMPORTANT VOID, BUT BECAUSE HE HOPES LATER ATTRACT BIG\nFOUNDATION MONEY(I.E., FORD OR ROCKEFELLER) AND, THEN, IN SOME\nSALARIED CAPACITY I WILL GET CUT PROCEEDS. THIS EMINENTLY REASONABLE\nHERE.\n\n3. BASED FOREGOING, REQUIRE AUTHORITY USE $2,000(U.S.)\nDATA FUNDS TO UNDERTAKE DEVELOPMENTAL ACTION IN ORDER GET X WORK\nON PROSPECTUS, POSSIBLE ASSISTANTS, CONTRIBUTORS, ETC. AND OTHER\nFACETS. $400 CORPORATE CAPITAL DEPOSIT WILL BE REQUIRED LATER\nWHEN CORPORATION FORMATION NEAR FINAL STAGE. IF DESIRE TO TAKE\nSUCCESSIVE STEPS, THEN ONLY $700 REQUIRED BUT MUST RECOGNIZE THIS\nWILL SPAN OUT CONSIDERABLY TIME OF STARTING ACTIVITY.\n\nC/S COMMENT: \"MRS ANXIOUS THOUGHT WORK OUT DETAILS JOURNAL.\"\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\n\nCONF: WH 5\nINFO: ADOP, C/CA 2, C/C1, DO/S, D/OP, VR\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\nREF: A. DIR 03351\nB. MEXI 8448-5\n\n1. HQS HAS BEEN ADVISED CONFIDENTIALLY THAT TICHBORN NO\n   LONGER UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR REY APPOINTMENT. NO REASON GIVEN.\n\n2. TICHBORN SHOULD NOT REPEAT NOT BE ADVISED OF THIS INCIDENT.\n\n3. IT ASSUMED TICHBORN NOW REMAIN IN PLACE. REPLY TO\n   REF B BY SEPARATE MESSAGE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nSPASST/DD/P Gordon Mason (phone)\n\n*IN 30532\n\nJ. C. KING\nC/WHD\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICERS\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n\nCopy No.\n\n261-253203\nSECRET 6223032\nDIR CITE MEXI 5455\n\n1. EDWARD G. TICHBORN ON EMERGENCY LEAVE TO HANDLE UNEXPECTED LITIGATION CASE IN CALIF. HE DEPARTED MEXI ON 2 MAR AND EXPECTS RETURN 6 MAR. HE CAN BE REACHED THRU IDEN.\n\n2. NO INDEX.\n\nSECRET\n\n[Signature]\n\n201-253203\nSECRET 023305Z\nDIR CITE MEXI 8458\nREF MEXI 8458 (w 30666)\nIDENT ALLEN KAUFMAN, ATTORNEY\nBEVERLY HILLS, CALIF.\nSECRET\n\n[Signature]\n\nJul 25 3203\n\nSECRET\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nCopy No.\nSECRET\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\nACTION: C/W 5 (WH COPY SLOTTED AT 2100, 25 FEB 64 (DD))\nINFO: ADDP, D/OP, DOS, VR\n\nSECRET 26519\n\nPRIORITY DIR CITE MEXI 8384\n\nREF DIR 83351 P\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\n(CS COMMENT: REQUESTED OPINION TICHBORN.)\n\nNO NITE ACTION\n\n1. FOLLOWING IS SUMMARY OPINION OF TICHBORN, FROM OFFICERS WHO HAVE DEALT WITH HIM: EXCELLENT CHARACTER AND COMPLETE LOYALTY TO COYOTE. ALTHOUGH AT STATION REQUEST TICHBORN HAS DEALT IN MEXI WITH PERSONS OF FAR LEFT, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION THAT HIS POLITICAL INCLINATIONS ARE ANYTHING BUT COMPLETELY PRO-PBPRIME. THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT HIS ABILITY AT ANY CHORE INTERESTING ENOUGH TO STIMULATE HIM. HE IS EXTREMELY LUCID, AND HIS MIND CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS BRILLIANT. HE HAS AN EVEN, PLACID TEMPERAMENT. HIS JUDGEMENT APPEARS TO BE SOUND (ALTHOUGH IN MEXI HIS ASSIGNMENTS HAVE USUALLY BEEN OF THE TYPE IN WHICH HE FOLLOWED STATION GUIDANCE). HE IS NOT GOOD AT DETAIL, SUCH AS REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING. IN ESSENCE, HE IS A SHARP OPERATOR, WHO COULD PROBABLY DO WELL IN POSITION OF IMPORTANCE.\n\n2. STATION NOT IN POSITION TO COMMENT ON HIS LEGAL ABILITY. HIS LOCAL ACTIVITY FALLS IN THE PUBLIC RELATIONS CATEGORY (AS A PBPRIME CITIZEN HE NOT ALLOWED PRACTICE MEXI).\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nCopy No. 261-253-203\nSECRET\n\n24 FEBRUARY 1961\n\nMEXICO CITY\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\n\nFROM: J. C. H.\n\nSUBJECT: CONSIDERING EDWARD G. TICHBORN FOR IMPORTANT APPOINTMENT IN LEGAL FIELD. O'BRIEN KNOWS HE WORKS FOR INDIAN AND WE MUST GIVE AUTHORITY TO OPINION OF HIS CHARACTER, ABILITY, TEMPERAMENT, AND JUDGMENT. WITHOUT ADVISING TICHBORN, REQUEST YOU CABLE DATA AND OPINIONS OF YOURSELF AND OFFICERS WHO HAVE DEALT WITH HIM. WE HAVE HIGHEST OPINION OF HIM.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nJ. C. H.\n\nRELEASING OFFICER\n\nAUTHENTICATING OFFICER\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSECRET 040362\n\nPRIORITY DIR INFO PRIORITY GUAT CITE MEXI 8361\n\nDESENSITIZED\n\nREF DIR 98833\n\n1. TICHBORN CONTACTED ESGAIN-7 BY TELEPHONE AT 1700 LOCAL 3 FEB. WILL MEET AT 1730 LOCAL 3 FEB.\n\n2. AWAIT FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: *RE PLS CABLE REPORT ON INITIAL CONTACT AND INSTRUCTIONS WILL FOLLOW.\nTO: MEXICO CITY, GUATEMALA CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: C/WH 5\nINFO: ADDP, C/61, VR\n\nDESIGNATED ESGAIN\n\nREFS: A. DIR-97680*\nB. DIR 97691**\n\n1. ESGAIN 7 PHOSED CALGOND MORNING 3 FEB FROM MEXICO CITY\nAND GAVE NEW ADDRESS: HARIANO ESCOBEDO 479, APART-\nMENT 203, TELEPHONE 45 6440 EXTENSION 203. PLS HAVE TICHERON\nMAKE CONTACT UNDER ALIAS ASAP.\n\n2. IF TICHERON NOT AVAILABLE, PLS HAVE ETSINGER MAKE\nTELEPHONE CONTACT ASAP. PLS CABLE REPORT ON INITIAL CONTACT\nAND INSTRUCTIONS WILL FOLLOW.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nWH COMMENTS: *Iden staying with wife at Continental Hilton.\nExpects contact.\n\n**Gives true name of Iden.\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nINFO: GUATEMALA CITY\n\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH S\nINFO: CI, CI/3PS, CI/OA, VR\n\nTO: DODORATE MEXI\nINFO: ROUTINE GUAT\n\nSUBJECT: REPAIR 7964\n\nX. CONSIDER USE YICHORN UNDER ALL S. MAKE CONTACT AT ONCE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nCS COMMENT: *IN 08477.\n\nJ. C. KON\nC/WH\n\nWH/3/CA\nWH/3/MEXI\nWH/OPS\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n\nCopy No. 1/3\n\nAUTHORIZING OFFICER\n\nSECRET\n\n1389a\n\nRI COPY\n\nRI COPY\n\n201-253203\nSECRET 292129Z\n\nPRIORITY DIR INFO PRIORITY GUAT CITE MEXI 7984\n\nREF: DIR 97690\n\nPREFER NOT USE ETSINGER ON ESSAIN 7 OR OTHER OP UNTIL STA AND HQ BOTH SATISFIED SECURITY ASPECTS. SUGGEST USE TICHBORN TO CONTACT INITIALLY AND IF DESIRED, PATAKER CAN TAKE OVER ON HIS ARRIVAL. ON RECEIPT REPLY WILL MAKE CONTACT.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: REQ CONTACT IDEN, HOGW 3547.\n\nFell Tichborn 207\n\n201253203\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED\n\nCopy No. 1\nChief of Station, Mexico City\n\nChief, WH Division\n\nKUWOLF/Operational, Status of Projects on Principal Agents\n\nAction: As Stated Below\n\nREPS: A. HMA-11534\n     B. HMA-21914\n     C. DIR-63033\n     D. DIR-61786\n     E. MEX-5613\n     F. DIR-55204\n     G. HMA-22041\n\n1. Now that Douglas Preapane's conversion has been approved, Headquarters requests that the Station submit a Project outline for his support. Headquarters is aware that the Station had drafted this project but was holding it until PREAPANE's new status became clarified.\n\n2. Station is also requested to submit a project on Edward G. TICHEBORN as per references D and F. In reply to reference E, TICHEBORN is considered a Station Mexico City agent which means that his salary should no longer be charged to JUNOPLAR/10.\n\n3. With reference to LIEBONY-1, the Station indicated in paragraph 4 of reference G, that with the arrival of SANDMANIE it might possibly drop this agent. In the event Station decides to continue using LIEBONY-1, please submit an amendment to LIPLUM Project or a separate support project for LIEBONY-1.\n\nOliver G. GALBOND\n\nDistribution:\nCal - COS, Mexico City\n\n5 November 1983\n21 October 1963\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Audit Staff\n\nTHROUGH: SSA-DD/S\n\nSUBJECT: Report of Audit of Project JHPOPLAR/10\n1 April 1962 - 31 March 1963\n\nREFERENCES:\nA. Memorandum for Chief, WH Division, subject as above, from Chief, Audit Staff dated 22 August 1963\n\nB. Memorandum for Comptroller, subject: \"Headquarters Treatment of Advances to Projects Funded Through Projects JHPOPLAR/10 and JHPOPLAR/12\", from Chief, Audit Staff, dated 24 September 1963\n\n1. The following is WH Division's reply to paragraph 5 of reference A:\n\na. The JHPOPLAR/10 Administrative Plan will be revised to incorporate the recommendations made in subject report.\n\nb. Investigation by WH Division determines that the salary of Edward G. Tichborn has been charged improperly to JHPOPLAR/10. A new project is being initiated against which Tichborn's salary will be charged.\n\nc. Appropriate Declarations of Trust will be obtained from project personnel for the University City Bank account.\nd. The Division is initiating action to close the project's account at the First National Bank.\n\n2. The revised Administrative Plan, referred to in paragraph 1 above, will include changes which reflect the recommendations made in reference 1.\n\n(Signed) W. E. Brooks\n\nJ. C. King\nChief, DI Division\n\nDistribution:\nOrig. & 1 - Addressee\n1 - SSA-DD/S\n1 - FD/Proprietary Accounts Section\n1 - DI/7\n1 - DI/3 - Mexico\n1 - DI/BF\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\nACTION: WH 8\nINFO: PG 2, CA 2, CI/CA, RF 2\n\nSECRET 170218Z\nDIR CITE: MEXI 5813\nC/S COMMENT: REQUESTED PROJECT RENEWAL\nREQUESTS FOR LICHEN, LICOAX, LILISP C, LILISP X, LINOCOLE,\nLITAIN. ALSO REQUESTED STA FORWARD NEW PROJECT OUTLINES\nTO COVER TICHBORN AND RIKON\n\nKUWOLF\n\n1. HMMA-21914 POUCHED 9 AUG IS GENERAL STATION COMMENT ON KUWOLF\nRENEWALS. AS REFERENCE INDICATES DISPATCHES POUCHED 9 AUGUST NOT\nRECEIVED MEXI KUWOLF DESK AS OF 16 AUG SUGGEST VALUE OBTAINING HMMA-21914\nASAP.\n\n2. STATION UNAWARE APPARENTLY SIGNIFICANT LAG BETWEEN ARRIVAL\nDISPATCHES HOS AND DELIVERY TO DESK. HMMA-21864, ACCORDING TO REF,\nHAD NOT HIT DESK AS OF 16 AUGUST YET SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECEIVED HOS\n8 AUG. PLEASE ADVISE IF THIS IS NORMAL DELAY. IF SO CERTAIN MATTERS\nNOW TREATED DISPATCHES WILL OF NECESSITY BE SUBJECT CABLE TRAFFIC.\n\n3. REF PARA TWO REF. TICHBORN RECRUITED AND BEING PAID FROM HOS.\nSTATION HAS AVOIDED UTILIZATION TICHBORN IN PROJECTS SO TIME CONSUMING\nAS TO PROHIBIT TRAVEL, AS IT WAS UNDERSTOOD HE WAS TO BE KEPT IN\nREADY STATUS FOR INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENT. SHOULD THIS UNDERSTANDING\nBE RETAINED NEW PROJECT FOR TICHBORN, OR CAN MEXI NOW CONSIDER HIM\nAS PRIMARILY MEXI AGENT?\n\nSECRET\n\nGROUP 1\nEXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DOWNGRADING AND DECLASSIFICATION.\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No.\n13 June 1963\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (p), Amendment of Contract\n\n1. It is requested that the contract, as amended for Edward G. TICHBORN, Contract Agent, be further amended effective 1 June 1963 as follows:\n\n   a. Increase basic compensation from $8,000 to $9,000 per annum.\n\n   b. Provide additional compensation for quarters procurement at the rate of $3,000 per annum for self and dependents.\n\n   c. Extend the period of the contract for an additional year.\n\n   d. All other provisions of the contract remain in effect.\n\n2. The increase in compensation as recommended by the Mexico City Station is based on the manner of TICHBORN's performance and the increased amount of time which he devotes to Agency requirements.\n\n3. The WH Division concurs with the Station recommendation. TICHBORN has become an increasingly valuable and productive covert asset.\n\nW. E. BROOKS\nChief, WH Support\nDESENSITIZED\n\n1. LINLUCX MET BY OUTSIDE CASE OFFICER TURING 31 MAY. TOLD CASE OFFICER HE DISTRESSED BECAUSE \"LEARNED DAY BEFORE DEPARTING PART THAT WIFE HAD CANCER.\" SAID HE BEEN THINKING RECENTLY OF \"RESIGNING\" FROM KURABA, BECAUSE IT SEEMED TO BE \"GOOD FRIEND THAT BAD SERVANT.\" ADOPTED HOWEVER THAT HE HAD NOT MADE FIRM DECISION.\n\n2. FYI AT LAST MINUTE IT WAS NECESSARY TO SUBSTITUTE LEO C.\n\nREASON FOR TICHORN AS OUTSIDE CASE OFFICER. THIS ONE FACT LICORRY-I APPROACHED TICHORN SHORTLY BEFORE LICIETY ARRIVAL REQUESTING TICHORN MEET-LINLUCX AS SOON AS LICIETY ARRIVED NEVI. STATION.\n\nIN PLANNING FOR TICHORN AS CASE OFFICER, HAD NOT REALIZED TICHORN KNOWN TO LICORRY BY 31 MAY.\n\nS.E.C.R.E.T.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Redacted]\nSECRET 212325Z\n\nDIR CITE MEXI 4670\n\nREF. HMMV-11562\n\n22 MAY 1963\n\nIN 43671\n\n1. STATION AGREES HQS EVALUATION TICHBORN AND CONCURS SALARY INCREASE AND HOUSING ALLOWANCE AMENDMENT. ALSO AGREE INSURANCE RIGHTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED CONTRACT.\n\n2. BELIEVE RAISE SHOULD BE $1,000 PER ANNUM WITH HOUSING AT $3,030, WHICH TOTAL MEETS TICHBORN'S OWN REQUEST. THESE FIGURES PROPOSED TO TICHBORN (WITHOUT COMMITMENT) 21 MAY AND ACCEPTABLE TO HIM.\n\nSECRET\nACT: Cable comments on Contract renewal and amendment\n\n1. While TICHBORN was at Headquarters in April, he said he needed $8,000 per year more than the $8,000 plus expenses he receives under his present contract. He cited the high cost of living in Mexico, and the increased amount of time he is spending on behalf of KUBARK, at the expense of his cover. He said that his financial situation will soon force him to spend more time on his law practice, limiting his availability to KUBARK.\n\n2. Headquarters thinks highly of TICHBORN, and we regard him as an excellent long time asset who might possibly be converted to career agent in the future, when his legal practice is less lucrative, or he chooses to work almost full time for KUBARK.\n\n3. Meanwhile, Headquarters believes that the fairest arrangement for KUBARK and for TICHBORN, would be to keep him in contract status, raising his salary. This would ensure KUBARK's continued utilisation of his valuable services, would assure the maintenance of a strong cover, and at the same time would give TICHBORN the incentive to work hard at his cover and would permit him to realise the return from his cover efforts. If TICHBORN were converted to Career Agent status now, there would be almost, if not total offset of his cover income.\n\n(continued)\n4. Headquarters suggests that when TIEGBORN's contract is renewed as of 19 May 1963 for two years, it be amended to increase his salary by $1,000 per year, and that additional compensation of $3,500 per year be included for housing. The whole amount would be taxable. A clause can also be added to the contract authorising TIEGBORN to apply for the special life and hospitalisation insurance given Contract Agents.\n\n5. Please discuss the proposal in paragraph 4 and/or any Station ideas with TIEGBORN, but avoid making any commitments. Since the present contract expires on 19 May, it is requested that the Station cable its views on TIEGBORN's future use and proper pay.\n\nEND OF DISPATCH\n| TO | ROOM NO. | DATE RECEIVED | OFFICER'S INITIALS |\n|----|----------|---------------|--------------------|\n| 1  | /w/1/3   |               |                    |\n| 2  | NEXT     |               |                    |\n| 3  | Line     |               |                    |\n| 4  | w/1/1 Van |               |                    |\n| 5  | PK       |               |                    |\n| 6  | w/1/3/May|               |                    |\n| 7  | Boston   |               |                    |\n| 8  |          |               |                    |\n| 9  |          |               |                    |\n| 10 |          |               |                    |\n| 11 |          |               |                    |\n| 12 |          |               |                    |\n| 13 |          |               |                    |\n| 14 |          |               |                    |\n| 15 |          |               |                    |\n| 16 |          |               |                    |\n| 17 | RID/FI   |               |                    |\n\n**Comments:**\n- Copy detached\n- To be released with ext. 53203\n\n**File Title:**\n- [Handwritten text]\n\n**Date Microfilmed:**\n- 24 April 63\n\n**Document Number:**\n- MMMA 21148\n1. Station Mexico regrets that, to date, it has been unable to obtain the Reference report from Tichborn. As Headquarters is aware, Tichborn, while brilliant and articulate, is not always dependable, especially when it comes to routine tasks. It is true, however, that Tichborn has been extremely busy traveling for KUBARK, and is at the moment on another of his frequent trips.\n\n2. In any event, Tichborn has promised to provide the report as soon as he returns from his present trip. It will be forwarded when received from him.\nSECRET 842234Z\nMEXI INFO DIR CITE BUEN 9288\n5 APR 1963\n\n1. TICHBORNE RETURNING EVENING 5 APRIL. PLEASE ADVISE WIFE.\n   ALSO PLS REITERATE OUR APPRECIATION OF HIS EFFORTS HERE AND AT SAME\n   TIME REMIND HIM THAT HE AGREED TO GIVE US A FULL REPORT HIS BUEN VISIT.\n\n2. FOR DIR: TICHBORNE ABLE DEVELOP IN SHORT TIME AVAILABLE\n   GOOD FEELING FOR LOCAL SITUATION THROUGH CONTACTS DEVELOPED ON HIS\n   OWN INITIATIVE PLUS CONFERENCES WITH KEY STATION PERSONNEL, INCLUDING\n   REUTLINGER AND BUCHEK.\n   INTERVIEWED\n   250 PERSONS FROM NEWS\n   VENDORS TO SENIOR BUSINESS LEADERS. UNABLE MAKE CONTACT WITH\n   BICENTER WHO INDICATED THAT DUE PRESENT MILITARY CRISIS HIS EVERY\n   MOVE COVERED BY NEWSMEN, THUS HE PREFERRED NOT SEE TICHBORNE.\n\nSECRET\n\nS/C HOTEL PORTION GARBLED-BEING SVCD.\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division\n\nSUBJECT: Edward O. TICHBORN (p), Contract Amendment\n\n1. It is requested that the contract for Edward O. TICHBORN, Contract Agent, be amended to delete the current paragraph 2. Travel and Operational Expenses and insert:\n\n\"2. Travel and Operational Expenses. You will be advanced or reimbursed funds on an actual, reasonable and necessary expense basis for those expenses incurred by you in connection with such travel as may be directed or authorized by the Government and while on temporary duty away from your permanent post of assignment. In addition, you will be advanced or reimbursed funds for necessary operational expenses as specifically approved by the Government. Payment and accounting for all expenses incurred hereunder will be in substantial conformance with applicable Government regulations.\n\nThe effective date of the amendment should be as of the effective date of the contract, 19 May 1961.\n\n2. The above request is corrective in nature as it was not intended to change the travel expense provision which had been in effect during his previous contract.\n\nW. E. SEOKS\nChief, VH Support\n19 March 1963\n\nPaul O:\n\nTichborn's original contract provided for travel on an actual expense basis. This was when he was working on a daily or job rate basis.\n\nThis contract was terminated and a new contract was written in May 1961. He was given $8,000 per year and the reimbursement for operational travel section reads: \"This may include per diem in lieu of subsistence.\"\n\nNone of Tichborn's travel claims have been processed since the new contract has been effective. All travel claims submitted by him starting in June 1961 have been submitted on an actual expense basis.\n\nFinance takes the view that the \"This may include per diem---\" as restricting Tichborn to per diem only plus of course operational expenses. Processing Tichborn's old accounts on this basis would require him to refund several hundred dollars.\n\nAn amendment to the contract would take care of these old accounts as submitted.\n\nOptions:\n\n1. Get refund from Tichborn\n2. Amend contract to cover actual expenses to present date.\n3. Amend contract to cover actual expenses past and future.\n\nWhat are your wishes?\n\nCurrie\nSECRET 1121352\nMEXI INFO DIR CITE BUEN 9047.\nRECEIVED\nREF: MEXI 3703 (10 82504)\n11 MAR 1963\nIN3870\n\n1. FEEL TOY CAN BE LIMITED TEN WORKING DAYS. PLEASE ADVISE ETA AND TRUE NAME TICHBORN.\n\n2. CONTACT PLAN: TICHBORN (AS MR. WILLIAMS) SHOULD CALL 46-3248 DURING OFFICE HOURS AND ASK FOR KEN TO ARRANGE LUNCHEON MEETING SAME DAY AT NOGARO HOTEL, J.A. ROCA 562. WILL BE MET IN LOBBY WHERE HE SHOULD BE SEATED AND READING \"TIME\" MAGAZINE.\n\nSECRET\n\nC/S COMMENT: *SUBJ AVAILABLE MID-MARCH.\n\n201-253203\n\nSECRET\n\nEXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DOWNGRADING & DECLASSIFICATION\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\n1. Referenced dispatch was discussed with the Ambassador on 6 March. He said that in talking with Oliver G. GALLON and others in Headquarters in early 1962 as well as with Chief, INTELLIGENCE, he had expressed great appreciation for the assistance rendered by Edward G. TICHECORN. He said that he still felt that a similar survey, made a year or so after the first one, would be most helpful in assessing significant changes in the outlook of the various segments of Salvadoran society. Also discussed was the possible utility of an early April 1962 survey on the issues and personalities as they might develop during the forthcoming elections, presently scheduled for 29 April 1962. However, the Ambassador concluded that he was, of course, aware that there are other priority needs for TICHECORN's services.\n\n2. While the Station would welcome another visit by subject, it does not appear that the need for a general survey is so pressing as it was a year ago. It is doubted that basic conditions have changed greatly, and the changes which have taken place have been fairly well covered in COMINT reporting. With regard to the pre-election estimate, mentioned above, it should be noted that there are no other parties to date in the field except the government party, the Partido Conciliacion Nacional (PCN), and only the PCN has thus far put forward candidates for President and Vice President. Unless postponed, the closing date for announcements is 12 March. In other words, at the moment it appears that the net result of the overwhelming victory of the PCN in the elections of last December has made the forthcoming elections a mere formality.\n\n3. The Station will appreciate early advice of a second visit by TICHECORN, if his schedule permits.\n\nSTEPHEN H. KARHAN\n\nSRK/gsm\n\n7 March 1962\n\nDistribution:\n3-WHD\n1-Mexico City\nSECRET\n\nDATE: 27 FEB 63\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: BUENOS AIRES\nACTION: C/SH 5\nINFO: ADDP, C/SH 5, S/C 2\n\nFILE\n\nFEB 27 2215Z 63\n\nROUTINE\n\nSECRET\n\nDESPARATED\n\nREF: MARY-7795 (NOT SENT MEXI)\n\n1. REQUEST ADVICE ON AVAILABILITY TICHBORN FOR VISIT BUEN WITHIN\nNEXT MONTH. PURPOSE TO MAKE INITIAL CONTACTS AND SURVEY LOCAL ISSUES,\nPERSONALITIES AND POWER ELEMENTS TO BE FACTORS ELECTIONS NOW\nSCHEDULED 23 JUNE HAVING IN MIND HIS RETURNING IN LATE MAY\nFOR PERIOD THROUGH ELECTIONS SHOULD DEVELOPMENTS INITIAL VISIT\nSO WARRANT.\n\n2. EFFORTS BY RENTLINGER TO CONTACT IDENTITY HAVE REVEALED\nTHAT HE NOT ARAMBURU CAMPAIGN MANAGER NOR CURRENTLY DIRECTLY\nINVOLVED IN HIS CAMPAIGN. THIS MAY WELL BE TO OUR ADVANTAGE\nSINCE WE PREFER THAT TICHBORN CONTACT A BROAD RANGE OF POLITICAL\nLEADERS AND GROUPS. HOWEVER PREFER TO EXPLORE IDENTITY POSITION\nFURTHER BEFORE TICHBORN CONTACT TO REQUEST HE NOT ADVISE IDENTITY OF\nTRIP YET.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n201-253-203\n\nK\n\nSECRET\nDATE: 27 FEB 63\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: BUENOS AIRES\nACTION: C/W 5\nINFO: ADDP, C/CA 2, S/C 2\n\nTO: MEXI\nINFO: KAPOK\nDIR: CITE BUEN 8971\n\nREF: BUEN 8970 (IN 75985)\nIDEN IS JULIO PIACINTINI.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n201-253-203\n\nGROUP I\nSECRET\nEXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC DECLASSIFICATION.\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nUPON RETURN TICHDORN NEXTI, CARA STATION WILL APPRECIATE AS\nDETAILED INFO AS POSSIBLE ON IDENTITIES BUSINESSMEN CONTACTED,\nTECHNIQUES DESIRED AND GENERAL INSPECTIONS, ETC.\n\nC/S COMMENT: \"MC CORMICK INVITED TO CARA BY \"GROUP OF BUSINESSMEN\" WHO WANT\nINSTRUCTIONS IN POLITICAL ELECTION TECHNIQUES.\"\nDATE: 2, FEB 63\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\nACTION: WH 8\nINFO: CA 2, CI/OPS, CI/DA, S/C 2\n\nREF: MEXI 3290 (IN 61084)\nIDENT OF REF MR HENRY (HANK) LOPEZ.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nCARA INFO\\DIR CITE MEXI 3298\n\n1. FYI: MEXI STATION CONTRACT AGENT EDWARD G. TICHBORN (IDEN) ARRIVING CARA TWO FEBRUARY FOR FOUR DAY VISIT. HIS BUSINESS PERSONAL AND NO CONTACT WITH STATION PLANNED.\n\n2. TICHBORN TRAVELING WITH MR. CARLOS MCCORMICK, MOGUL OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE. MCCORMICK INVITED TO CARA BY \"GROUP OF BUSINESSMEN\" WHO WANT INSTRUCTION IN POLITICAL ELECTION TECHNIQUES. MCCORMICK INSISTED THAT TICHBORN, WHO HANDLED SPIDEAL CAMPAIGN IN PRIME SPANISH-SPEAKING AREAS, ACCOMPANY HIM ON TRIP.\n\n3. SHOULD ABOVE ACTIVITY NEGATIVELY CROSS WIRES WITH CARA STATION OPERATIONS, OR SHOULD CARA WISH CONTACT TICHBORN FOR ANY REASON, HE STAYING TAHANACO AND WILL RESPOND TO \"FRIEND OF DAVE'S\".\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nGUNTINFO DIR CITE MEXI 293911N41500\nREF DIR 494554\nTICHBORN ETA GUAT 2 JANUARY PAN AM 501. WILL REGISTER\nBILTMORE HOTEL AND AVOID CONTACT FROM \"FRIEND OF DAVE\".\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: REQUESTED TICHBORN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO GO TO GUAT AND ASSESS\nPUBLIC OPINION ON MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, AND TRENDS.\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\nACTION: WH 8 (WH NOTIFIED AND COPY SLOTTED AT 1550 DEC 62)\nINFO: CA 2, CI/OPS, CI/CA, S/C 2\n\nPRITY CIE SITE MEXI 2748 IN29417\nREF DIR 41116 (OUT 85000)\nDIR 41364 (OUT 95732)\nMEXI 2426 (IN) 12015\n\n1. TICHBORN REPORTS TWO TELEPHONE CALLS TO HIS HOME FROM ARGENTINA DURING HIS ABSENCE. PRESUMES CALLS FROM SUBJECT OF REFS OR HIS AIDE TO DISCLOSE POSSIBILITY TICHBORN APPROACHING CERTAIN AMERICAN COMPANIES WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY INDICATED WILLINGNESS \"SUPPORT\" SUBJECT REFS SHOULD WE DECIDE RUN FOR PRESIDENCY.\n\n2. WHAT SHOULD TICHBORN'S RESPONSE BE SHOULD CALLS COME THROUGH? ADVISE SOONEST.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: \"REF KAPOK.\"\n1. IF REF CALLS ARE FROM BICENTER GROUP, TICHBORN SHOULD DECLINE ACT AS FUND RAISER, AND IF POSSIBLE SHOULD DISCOURAGE BICENTER FROM ATTEMPT TO RAISE CAMPAIGN FUNDS IN PBPRIME. REALIZE THIS MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR TICHBORN HANDLE GRACEFULLY. PERHAPS TICHBORN COULD PLEAD PREVIOUS BUSINESS COMMITMENTS AS EXCUSE. IN ANY CASE HQS WILL REFER TO HIS JUDGMENT RE IMPLEMENTATION.\n\n2. HQS REASONING RE ABOVE IS THAT FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF PBPRIME BUSINESS INTERESTS COULD PREJUDICE BICENTER REPUTATION AND ELECTION PROSPECTS.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nWh Comment: *Tichborn has received telephone calls from Argentina.\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: GUATEMALA CITY\nACTION: WH 8\nINFO: CA 2, CA/PEG, CI/OA, S/C 2\n\nREF: MEXI 2665 (IN 24747)*\n\nTICHBORN TRIP IN JANUARY DESIRED.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: * REQ. ADVISE IF TICHBORN TRIP EARLY JANUARY DESIRED.\nPRITY DIR INFO PRITY NEXT CITY GUAT 2534 IN 20632\n\nREF: DIR 49455 (and 99279)\n\nWE BELIEVE AUTHORITATIVE SURVEY PUBLIC OPINION IN CAPITAL, OTHER MAIN CITIES AND RURAL AREAS WOULD BE VERY VALUABLE IN CONNECTION FUTURE POLITICAL ACTION ONS HERE. WE THEREFORE WELCOME TICHBORN ASSIGNMENT IF HE CAPABLE SUCH SURVEY.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: REQUESTED TICHBORN BE MADE AVAILABLE TO GO TO GUAT AND ASSESS PUBLIC OPINION ON MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES AND TRENDS. HE IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN IN MEXICO CITY.\n1. REQUEST TICHDRN BE MADE AVAILABLE SOON TO GO TO GUAT AND ASSESS PUBLIC OPINION ON MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, AND TRENDS. IN RECENT GUAT CITY MAYORALITY ELECTION, AREVALO SUPPORTER, VILLAGRAN KRAMER, RAN SURPRISINGLY STRONG SECOND, EVEN WITHOUT AREVALO'S EXPRESS ENDORSEMENT. DESIRE CHECK PARTICULARLY ON SENTIMENT OUTSIDE GUAT CITY; EVENTS SHOW THAT LEFTIST TREND IN THAT CITY DOES NOT PROVE SIMILAR TREND IN OTHER AREAS. PLS ADVISE.\n\n2. FOR GUAT: TICHDRN IS U.S. CITIZEN LAWYER IN MEXI CITY WHO ALSO WRITER, HAS DONE VALUABLE SURVEY OF OPINION IN SAN SALVADOR. RECOMMEND TICHDRN CONSULT STATION ON ARRIVAL. PLS COMMENT.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nWH/3/GUAT\n\nWH/COPS\n\nJ. C. KING\nC/WH/3\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nTO: DIRECTOR\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\nACTION: C/WH 3 (C/WH TEMPO COPY SLOTTED 0400, 10 OCT) RD\nINFO: ADDP, C/CA 2, C/C1, S/C 2\n\nTO: DIR\nINFO: BUEN\nCITY: MEXI. 2170\n\nRE: DIR 41118 (OUT 85000)\nDIR 41364 (OUT 85432)*\n\nDECLASSIFIED\n\n\"TICHBORN ARRIVING NEW YORK 12 OCTOBER.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\"\n\nC/S COMMENT: *HOS STATED THEY HOPEFULLY AWAITING FAVORABLE WORD TICHBORN ABLE TAKE ASSIGNMENT INTERPRETER/ESCORT OFFICER.\n\nS-E-C-R-E-T\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: C/WH 5\nINFO: ADDP, C/C1, S/C 2\n\nTO: OPIM\nINFO: ROUTINE BUEN\n\nC/S COMMENT: *IDEN (UNIDENTIFIED) COMING U.S. 41364\n\nKAPOK\nON UNOFFICIAL VISIT BEGINNING 10 OCT. HOS CONSIDERING\nTICHBORN AS ESCORT OFFICER 16-20 OCT. QUERIED ANY REASON HE\nNOT AVAILABLE OR UNABLE UNDERTAKE JOB.\n\nREF: DIR 41118 (OUT 85000)*\n\n1. HOS HOPEFULLY AWAITING FAVORABLE WORD TICHBORN ABLE TAKE\nREF ASSIGNMENT AS IT CONSSENSUS HERE HE MAN FOR JOB, ON\nASSUMPTION ALL FAVORABLE PLS INSTRUCT TICHBORN:\n\nA. ARRIVE NEW YORK CITY EARLIEST DATE, IF\nPOSSIBLE BY 12 OCTOBER.\n\nB. CHECK INTO HOTEL OF CHOICE.\n\nC. PHONE METROPOLITAN 8-0469, WASHINGTON, D.C.,\nIDENTIFYING SELF TRUE NAME, REPORTING NAME OF HOTEL AND ROOM\nHE STAYING AND ASK THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RELATED TO\nMR. NELSON. (THIS IS 24 HOUR ANSWERING SERVICE AND UPON\nRECEIPT OF INFO HOS CASE OFFICER WILL PHONE TICHBORN TO\nARRANGE EARLIEST MEETING IN NEW YORK FOR COVER AND ASSIGNMENT\nBRIEFING.)\n\n2. ADVISE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nSECRET\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: C/WH 5\nINFO: ADDP, C/PG, C/CA 2, C/C1, S/C 2\n\nHAPUK\nUNITED STATES\n\n1. IDEM COMING EXTE ON UNOFFICIAL VISIT BEGINNING 10 OCTOBER. AS IDEM IS OF GREAT INTEREST TO US, WE PLAN TO PROVIDE INTERPRETER/ESCORT OFFICER DURING 10 DAY VISIT.\n\n2. WE ARE CONSIDERING TICHERON AS ESCORT OFFICER 16-28 OCTOBER. PLEASE CABLE PRITY ANY REASON IF NOT AVAILABLE OR UNABLE TO UNDERTAKE. IN MEANTIME AND IF IDEM REPORTS FAVORABLE SUGGEST TICHERON BE ALERTED TO POSSIBILITY OF VISIT AND MAKE PRELIMINARY PREPARATIONS.\n\nIDEAL ARRIVE NEW YORK BY 15 OCTOBER. TRUE VALUE OF IDEM SHOULD NOT BE REVEALED TICHERON UNTIL ASSIGNMENT FIRM.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nTO: MEXICO CITY BUENOS AIRES\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: C/WH 5\nINFO: ADDH, C/PG, C/CA 2, C/C1, S/C 2\n\nTO: PRITY LEXI INFO LURU\n\nKAPOK\n\nREF: DIR 41118 (CUT OUT5000)\n\nIDEN - GENERAL PEDRO ARAMBURU\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nCable Sec: *Pls fill in number of attached cable as ref.\nDIR CITE MEXI 1927\n\n1. EDWARD G TICHBORN HAS RECEIVED INVITATION TO BE GUEST SPEAKER AT SESSION OF HARVARD CENTER LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES SEMINAR 17-22 SEPTEMBER. UNDERSTAND THIS WILL BE KICK-OFF MEETING YOUNG LATIN POLITICAL LEADERS PRIOR TO TWO MONTH OBSERVATION OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS.\n\n2. STATION FEELS TICHBORN ATTENDANCE VALUABLE OPPORTUNITY TO CULTIVATE MEXICAN DELEGATES. ALSO WOULD BOLSTER HIS COVER, AND PROVIDE EXCELLENT CONTACTS FOR FUTURE REQUIREMENTS OTHER COUNTRIES.\n\n3. TICHBORN MUST RESPOND TO INVITATION IMMEDIATELY. HE WILL ACCEPT UNLESS HEADQUARTERS ADVISES OTHERWISE PRIOR TO 14 SEPTEMBER.\n\n4. WILL ADVISE TICHBORN TRAVEL PLANS WHEN FIRM SHOULD HIS WISH TO CONTACT.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nEDM-10859, 2 August 1962\n\n1. Edward G. TICHNOR is available at any time for JETPA travel. Trips of more than five weeks would be difficult, both for the Station and for TICHNOR. (He is currently handling operation JETPA, which is so sensitive that the Station would be reluctant to use an interim cut-out.)\n\n2. In the case of Leo C. REILICH, he can of course be released as requested by Headquarters for JETPA. His absence will, as previously noted, work considerable hardship on the Station's current JETPA program. REILICH handles JETPA, which takes very little time; JETPA-16, which takes considerable time; and JETPA-15, which is almost a full-time job. In the latter project, for instance, he meets with his principal agents almost daily, and with his Station case officer at least five times a week. It would be extremely difficult to release him during the six-week period immediately prior to elections at the National University each year (usually September, October). Since REILICH, in his cover capacity, is active as a professor, as much lead time as possible is requested prior to travel requests. As an example, REILICH is already signed up to deliver lectures in September in November of this year. Reference dispatch says travel for JETPA would require a minimum of three weeks, but does not mention the possible maximum. Primarily for cover reasons, and secondarily for operational reasons, the Station feels that any travel lasting more than four weeks would be almost impossible to accept. In spite of the above restrictions the Station will, of course, release REILICH at any time for any period if Headquarters feels his contribution will be greater elsewhere.\n\nAllard C. Curtis\n\n3 - WED\n2 - Files\n\nDATE TYPED: 7 Sept. 1962\nDATE DISPATCHED: 11 Sept. 1962\n\nHEADQUARTERS FILE NUMBER: 1977\n\nSECRET\n\n50-123-0\n1. There are a number of countries where we want to begin detailed political systems analyses as a basis for election planning. To have in mind here a \"nuts and bolts\" examination of the building blocks of the political parties and the political systems used in countries such as Peru and Chile among others.\n\n2. While planning on the above is at this stage still tentative, we would like an indication from Mexico and San Juan stations as to the availability of FICOSUR and REMICIE (separately) in Mexico and REMICIE-1 in Puerto Rico to go on such survey missions for a minimum of 3 weeks sometime during the next 4 months. We understand that Remicie Station would much prefer that we use FICOSUR rather than REMICIE for this type of survey but we would like to test the capabilities of REMICIE in this field if it is at all possible to break him loose from his current activities.\n\n3. Addressers' comments are solicited.\n\nEND OF DISPATCH\nOperational/Headquarters Debriefing of TICHBCRN\n\nACTION REQUIRED: FYI\n\nHerewith attached are the original and one copy of the Headquarters report of the debriefing of Edward TICHBCRN which took place in ZRMETAL in early June, 1962. It is requested that the original be passed to the local ODACID chief, after the Station has insured that the report has been sterilized to its satisfaction.\n\nEND OF DISPATCH\n\nDistribution:\n2 - San Salvador\n\nAttachment:\nHeadquarters report\n\nDATE TYPED: 8 August 1962\nDATE DISPATCHED: 10 AUG 1962\nHSSW-1844\nHEADQUARTERS FILE NUMBER\n201-253203\n6 August 1962\n\nThe following information was derived from a transcription of a tape made during a meeting with Edward TICHBORN in early June 1962 in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the meeting was to debrief TICHBORN concerning his opinions and experiences gained from a recent trip to El Salvador. TICHBORN spoke from notes for the first part of his report (pp 1-6) and answered specific questions for the remainder.\nI would like to go into several of the things that I have previously covered in my report. First of all, I am happy to say that the radio schools started by BURON'S Group seemed to have gotten off to a very good start. There have been about 100 sets distributed so that there are about now something like 10,481 students enrolled in 1,000 of the radio schools. It's apparently had very good success. They publish books that go along with the radio classes. As you probably will remember, there was a literacy campaign that was fashioned after the idea that was promulgated by Father SALCEDO in Columbia. Interesting to me is the fact that the radio schools have received about 1,400 letters with suggestions and praise and various other commentaries. One of the problems they are having right now is there isn't a transmitter powerful enough to get much beyond the capital. I understand that a transmitter is on route and it would certainly be a big boon to them. It seems to me that the radio is probably the most effective way of getting out to the groups in the outlying areas. There are no newspapers to speak of, and once you get the listeners hooked on the radio, then of course, you can go from literacy campaigns into various other things we have in mind. Incidentally, these radios as you probably realize are on a fixed frequency, and the program is lead by a priest, named Father Manuel MOLINA SIERRA.\n\nSpeaking about the priest, it is interesting to note that there has apparently been a considerable shift in the attitude of the Catholic Church with respect to reforms in San Salvador. It would not be surprising to note that this is probably a hemisphere-wide, if not a world-wide attitude on the part of Pope John, the 23rd. You might even kind of correlate this to what is happening in Spain and also in Portugal. In El Salvador, itself, the Bishop issued a letter sometime back with the last several months calling for social reforms and for immediate changes within the social structure of El Salvador. As I mentioned to you earlier, it caused considerable consternation with the so-called ruling 14. As a matter of fact, the ambassador mentioned to me that they have been complaining recently that they have lost the big three pillars of strength that they had, the army, the Church, and the American Embassy. As was predictable and I think I mentioned this in my last report, the so-called 14 and some of\nthe less wealthy people in El Salvador have looked askance at the Alliance for Progress. I think you will remember that in my last report I predicted that we would have problems with respect to many reforms if they were to be the sine qua non of aid from the United States.\n\nWith respect to the Church, I think it might be a good idea to give some very detailed study as to how we can exploit to the best possible extent, the apparent change within the Church not only in El Salvador but all over Latin America. I think that it might be a thing that we should sit around or someone sit around for a considerable time trying to analyze all the ins and outs, and how we can fit this into the whole program of action in Latin America.\n\nNow you ask me in our informal chats about the structure of these as far as the nationalities of the people involved in the hierarchy. I think it's in the upper structure, Spaniards and Italians, but in the lower structures most of the people are from El Salvador and some from Guatemala and that their natural inclination would be to go with the people. I think I mentioned in my earlier report that very frequently the priests in their early masses (say at 5:00, 6:00 or 7:00 a.m. would be attended naturally by the low-income groups) would ask for social changes and reforms. At the later masses, they would change the attitudes of their sermons because of the different economic complex of the people attending church. It's interesting to note that the Bishop's letter that was issued with respect to reforms got a very angry reaction from the 14.\n\nNow one of the things that I note with respect to the general political atmosphere in San Salvador is that there seems to be a considerable confusion among the people with respect to some of these reforms. Let's take for example, the minimum salary. It is one of the cornerstones of reform by the present ruling JUNTA, and it will be carried through by President-elect RIVERA. As of right now, there seems to be a very calculated campaign on the part of business and on the part of financiers to confuse the people, and they have done a good job of it. I remember talking to many people asking them candidly, \"what is this minimum salary all about?\" Many of them told me the government has decided that they can be paid only so much and no more. In other words, they have really converted it into an idea that this is maximum salary. Also there has been a considerable laying off of all people in certain\nfactories and the reason being given, that the government now makes it impossible for us to keep a full staff, and therefore we are reducing. This, of course, could have very serious effects on any ability of the government to carry through its reforms with respect to minimum wage. Interesting enough, there are even people in the lower classes, who having been confused by what it means, are very definitely against the whole idea of minimum wage. I think, here again, it is a necessity for the government either to acquire a newspaper or to buy a considerable interest in one of them and also to do a job of publicizing and getting the message across with respect to the general class of laborers. However, I anticipate that this difficulty\u2014that the people, with the economic power, are in a good position to at least partially sabotage this particular reform by the simple expedient of just laying people off and blaming it on the government. Let's face it, with respect to political reform in Latin America, the thing that is most meaningful to people is not political liberty, but \"bread in the belly.\" We have got to constantly bear in mind that when we, with our own criteria of political liberties here in the United States, go into Latin America we have got to realize that sometimes the right to vote and the right to express our views is a meaningless concept to a peasant who really is worried about whether he gets one tortilla or two tortillas; it's the bread that is the biggest political factor in any part of Latin America. In this respect, it is interesting to note that whereas the last time I was in El Salvador there was a lot of talk about Fidel Castro that was just kind of spontaneous and extemporaneous on the part of some several hundred people that I talked to. This time I also went through many of the low-income barrios out in the countryside and talked to a great number of people, and a great number of them kept mentioning Martinez who was the president for about 10 to 12 years back, 1934 to 45. Many of them, particularly, the older people spoke rather nostalgically about the times of Martinez when there were jobs and when the prices were low and when even though the wages were low, you could buy a full meal and could get comparatively comfortable housing. Of course, it is known that Martinez is one of the worst tyrants that they have had there; and for a long time the thing they remember is not the repressive measures that he took, not the number of people that were slaughtered under his orders. The thing that is remembered now mostly is the fact that there were more jobs, that the prices were low, etc. We've got to constantly hear\nin mind that the things that are mostly meaningful to these\ngroups of people is whether they are working, the price\nstructure, and just the general bare economic needs that are\nmet by any government. I want to talk now for a moment about\nthe Alianza para Progresso and some of my impressions about\nhow it's doing, not only in El Salvador, but in Guatemala and\nsome of the other countries that I observed. One of the most\nimmediate impressions that I get is during the last few months\nis that the Alianza para Progresso has been terribly over\npublicized. I think we made a serious mistake in arousing\nexpectations in Latin America that may not be met. As a\nmatter of fact, I know from talking with many of the people\nthere that the expectations they have simply are not within\nthe reckoning of what the United States has planned. I even\nthink it's unfortunate if we have a slogan, that the Alianza\npara Progresso as a slogan is open to serious attacks both\nhumorously and satirically. As a matter of fact, already\nmany people even our friends are beginning to use the slogan\nby way of criticism. I have in mind recently, that the foreign\nminister of Honduras was in Mexico and in a public statement\nsaid, \"we have a lot of alliance but no progress.\" And of\ncourse in the schools in El Salvador, there are all kinds of\nturnings about twisting the words around by way of criticism.\n\nWhat I mean by over publicizing and sloganizing is the\nfact that almost all over Latin America, the newspapers are\nreporting an outpouring of millions and millions of dollars,\nand as you might expect they convert the figures into pesos,\nor other local currency whatever you happen to be, so that\nthere is an announcement saying that the Alianza para Progresso\nhas allocated 10 million dollars and then they convert that\ninto 120 million pesos; it sounds like an awful lot of money.\nImmediately people have grandiose ideas about what is going\nto be done with all this money when in effect it is only a\nrequest for that kind of money that has been done. We have,\nbasically speaking, still some problems among Congress as to\nhow much money is going to be allocated. Let me give you a\nspecific case about what I feel is an over publicizing of\nthe Alliance's program. In El Salvador there was an announce-\nment in the papers that three million dollars had been allo-\ncated by the United States Government for the building of\nschools. Now, 3 million dollars converted into local currency\nis something like seven and half million colones. That's a\nbig sum of money down there and, of course, it got tremendous\nplay in all the newspapers. Well it turned out, what the\nAlliance had in mind, along with the Junta, was to build one\nhundred small schools. This would be 100 schools worth\naround $30,000 a piece. Well, one of the model schools, right\nnow, is in the process of constructions in one of the neigh-\nborhoods in El Salvador. While I was there, there was\nconsiderable snide criticism by the press; by a lot of the population that this was a poor example of Alliance for Progress spending. It was a small school; it was within the desired $30,000 budget, but I am thinking that most of the people in El Salvador having talked about 7,500,000 colones, were expecting palaces to be built. Suddenly you have a very small school, and it was being criticized by the press; by the people at large. The next day, quite fortunately, the Minister of Education very obly took this issue and quieted it by saying: \"We said we are going to build schools, not palaces.\" But I think that even this criticism could have been avoided had we announced rather that the expenditure of 3 million dollars or 7,500,000 colones, had we just announced that the Alliance for Progress, in cooperation with the El Salvador government, was going to build 100 small schools and say so without any more dressing it up, not even mention the amount of money that was going to be spent in total because then no one could expect more than a small school. Also I think it would have been better to have the first schools outside El Salvador, possibly in a little town like Santa Tecla or one of the other neighboring towns; and then build the school right next to the old school so that there would be a marked contrast in every way. You could see it immediately. Certainly there is always land available near all the old schools, and just destroy the old school when you've built the new one; and then really to do a public relations job, get statements from the teachers, from the students, and, perhaps, have the oldest school teacher in the neighborhood lay the cornerstone to the school. Really do a public relations job of it on a very personal basis rather than trying to stagger people with huge sums of money. This is what I mean by talking in huge figures when you can do a better job and arouse less expectation. When you have few expectations, almost anything is better; so I think if we talk little and act big, we're going to be much better off in the long run.\n\nI think also a very highly over-publicized group is the Peace Corps. Here again, I think we're setting ourselves up for some possible difficulty. All of this publicizing is very good for consumption here in the United States; but in the world we're living in now, the same kind of propaganda gets outside the United States. Already there are all kinds of jokes about the Peace Corps. Its done a terrific job of publicizing here in this country. They get great coverage in\nall the big picture magazines. In time there's going to be a musical comedy about the Peace Corps. All this is great stuff as far as the United States is concerned, but I'm afraid it is going to create serious problems abroad. Actually the actual observable benefit of the Peace Corps in the various areas will be very minimal when you consider, for example, they have about 29 people that will be in the Peace Corp in San Salvador. They're not going to be able to make much of a dent in separate communities, because they are separated. As I understand it, from talking to the manager of the Peace Corps for the Central American area; most of these kids will be alone in the villages they are going to, and whatever they do is not going to be very observable as far as the general population is concerned. Unfortunately, one of the things that we haven't yet learned in our thinking about these under-developed countries is the fact that we do such naive things as this: there is an elderly lady about 63 years of age that has been assigned to one of the small villages in southern El Salvador and her expertise is home economics. If you have ever been to one of these small villages and if you have seen that they subsist, and I say subsist, merely on a small supply of beans and maybe one or two tortillas; and the difference between the supply of one or two tortillas is a very meaningful one. When you start talking about balancing the diet and varying the diet and having a home economics expert to teach them this, this gets pretty ironic. This is precisely the thing that could easily be open to criticism and easily open to satire. I can imagine if I were someone in a position of Dr. Jose Rodriguez Ruiz, who was a very left leaning Dean of the School of Economics in El Salvador\u2014if I really wanted to cede on one issue and ridicule it, I would talk about this person who was an expert on home economics; balanced dieting; and how many vegetables you should have; what variety of vegetables, how much cottage cheese you should have; and the whole thing in the balanced diet. I could murder this whole thing in very short time and make it very ridiculous.\n\nI think these are things that we've got to think about. We've got to think about all the possible weaknesses, how this thing can be turned around. I know that in the United States, I know that in the hometown of this woman (she's from Nebraska) it sounds absolutely marvelous, and this home economics expert is going down to a little Latin American country and tell them all about home economics, but from the point of view of the Latin American it's sheer irony and it's susceptible to attack.\nWith respect to your question about the influence of the Church with the campesinos in other parts of the community, I think that it's probably true all over Latin America that the Church has great influence on the thinking of the population. It's interesting to note that in San Salvador and Mexico the real churchgoers are the women and not the men, but the men are very certain that their wives go to church so that they're their surrogates and that they take their children along with them. Although they are not great churchgoers, I think they are Catholics and are greatly influenced by the priests.\n\nYou asked whether the people in El Salvador are aware that there have been food shortages in Cuba and that the Castro program is undergoing serious difficulties and the answer to that is \"yes\". As a matter of fact I was interested in this when I talked to various people, including cab drivers and boys that shine your shoes, people working in the markets, and some of the campesinos. There is an awareness, certainly in the city, that Castro is having his difficulties. One of the things that is interesting and, of course, I think this may be referable to their Church influence, is that the word Communism per se still has a serious effect on people. I think it's one of the things they talk about--social reform, etc., etc., but, the tag Communism is still a very harsh tag in the Latin American mind. I think this is one of the serious errors Castro made from his point of view was to declare himself a Communist and a Marxist-Leninist because many people that might have gone along with him at that moment got frightened off. There is an awareness that he is having troubles and that the Revolution hasn't gone along the way it has. Also there was a lot of talk among a certain group of people that I talked with--these were some workers from a textile mill, that there had been an awful lot of killing that was done by Castro. Apparently, there had been pictures of a lot of executions in some of the Latin American newspapers; and this has had an effect on them.\n\nWith respect to the government prosecuting anyone for violation of the minimum wage law: As far as I understand, it's still in its infancy. I think the belief of the government is that if they start to impose any violations this might have a serious effect in getting the program across. But in this respect, I'd like to mention the seventh day wage that was passed about a year ago when I\nwas in Salvador apparently is working fairly well. You'll recall that this was accepting with the Bible that if anyone worked for six days (this was referable to the campesinos) he was entitled to the seventh day pay. I was worried at the time and mentioned my worries to Choretic (Phenetic) and also the Minister of Economics who was at breakfast with us at that time, that one of the possible dangers of any reform is that it is not carried through intelligently and forcibly. It is better not to have a reform, not to announce a new idea, not to arouse expectations, if there is going to be violation of those expectations. At that time it was contemplated that the army would administer the program of the seventh day pay. Apparently they have changed their mind on that and have a civilian group that is administering the program; there has been no real scandal with respect to violations of this. I was a little fearful that a local army guy would get paid off by some of the big plantation owners and thus be permitted to do all kinds of violations. Apparently this has not happened, and they've been pretty effective in the administration.\n\nMy big objection at that time was that again the minimum salary thing was not properly publicized. They could have had all kinds of radio and television programs, interviews with the campesinos, and asked them what they felt about this and actually doing that kind of public relations job which they did not do. I think this is true with all these reforms. I think that they have got to be brought to the people where you get reaction from the people as to the extent of the change, any reform has on their personal existence. This again is a matter of attitude, a matter of technique in public relations.\n\nWell, it is certainly true that there has been a considerable amount of publicity about the Alianza para Progresso. I was not aware that it was this specific group that was pushing the program of publication. However, harking back to a previous statement, I think that there is a serious possibility that over publicizing of the Alianza will cause more trouble than we can at present anticipate. As a matter of fact some of the problems are already beginning to arise. I had a long talk with Ambassador Williams on this, and I think we both agreed that we ought to soft pedal much of the talk about the Alianza; and certainly to stay away from these enormous figures of millions of dollars. As far as the people in Latin America\nare concerned they really think the world is going to change overnight and expect it to change overnight. When the changes aren't forthcoming, they are going to be very embittered and we may possibly create enemies we need not have had.\n\nI have in mind talking with one man; he was a newspaper vendor and I happened to see a headline about the Alianza para Progreso, and this of course gave me an opening to talk to him about it. I said, \"What is this going to mean to you?\" He said, \"I understand they are going to give me a new house.\" Someone standing close to him said, \"What do you mean\u2014they're going to give you a house,\" and they actually had an argument about the thing. The man selling the newspapers insisting that's what they were going to do\u2014build him a new house, etc. The other man saying that's all propaganda, it's all demagogy; they say this all the time and nothing is going to occur. The chances are very strong that this man will not get into a house. The chances are almost equally strong that he won't even get an apartment because you cannot possibly meet the housing shortage in such a place as San Salvador, where I doubt more than 10% of the people have adequate hygienic dwellings. So here again, well at least, this newspaper vendor has gotten an enormously overblown notion about what we're going to do. It may be that in his particular case, he is more aware of the Alianza and more aware of the million dollars because he is selling newspapers and magazines and he is reading about it all the time. Here again I think is one of the dangers with respect to the publicity about the Alianza.\n\nI think I mentioned in my report about a year ago it might be a good idea to get some experts in public relations, and that they might be recruited from such places as Mexico and Puerto Rico where you have people who have worked with either government agencies, with some of our embassies, or with some of the public relations firms such as General Rubicam & Noble Advertising and other very widely-known public relations groups in Latin America. I think it might be a good idea for the government to have someone counseling him and particularly on any wide shifts of policy on how to present it to the public. I think it would be an enormously effective way in presenting the programs of the government, and it would be a good investment they could make at this point. And I don't just mean getting the\nordinary Madison Avenue slick. I think it ought to be a person who has had some experience dealing with the Latin American temperament because any program has to arise out of the psyche of the people that are being dealt with.\n\nIncidentally, I did see some of the pictures and some of the coverage that was given Rivera during his election campaign and whoever handled that, I think, was very effective; and I've suggested to the Ambassador that he might suggest that the same people or person he retained to accompany Rivera into his position as president.\n\nI think one of the key persons with respect to the left in El Salvador is the Dean of the School of Economics whose name is Jose Rodriguez Puiiz. He is also the son of the president of the University. Now first a word about the young son\u2014he gave a lecture on Marxism one of the nights I was there, and I went to the lecture. The hall was filled to capacity; there were people standing in the doorways, and I would estimate there were 400 or 500 people there. It was a rather interesting experience because from what I heard I had been led to believe that it would be kind of a rabble rouser and that he would try to instigate the people into action. Actually what I saw was\u2014personally it was very moving, really. He has kind of the manner of a priest. His voice tends to tremble at first; but as he got more involved, he lost the tremor in his voice and sounded more like a very intense professor. The interesting thing was when he spoke about the United States, it was more in symbolic terms; there was nothing of real harsh personal rancor either in his voice, his manner, or in what he was actually saying; but it was almost as if he were referring to an abstraction of the United States. He didn't take off on the Ambassador personally. He just talked about American ambassadors and he was bitter, less inclined to be sarcastic than merely bitter. He is a very effective human being. I note as I sat there, he moved the audience that he had, emotionally. I could see one of them kind of swallowing and the tears running down eyes of the girl to the left of me. There was really no attempt to rabble rouse as such, there was no attempt to get the people out in the streets as it were. Toward the end he made a very interesting statement\u2014he said: \"We know that there are changes necessary, we know that we have got to free ourselves of the imperialist yoke of the United States, and we know that these changes have got to come through us; no one is going to help us but ourselves,\" but he says in making those\nchanges come about, let us be careful that we do not ruin and that we do not set back our program by taking precipitous action, without plan. Suddenly, it came almost as a jarring note, he said\u2014well perhaps we're not ready to act yet, but whatever we do, we've got to do it reasonably so that we don't lose the revolution as such. I don't know whether he had reference to the fact that maybe in Cuba the revolution did not work because certainly he was very pro Castro. I think that there was a kind of note of wariness in his talk, and it is interesting.\n\nI suggested to the ambassador that it might be a good idea for him to set up a meeting with Guillermo Moscoso with the older Jose Napoleon Rodriguez Ruiz who was the rector of the University, and possibly ask this younger fellow, the Dean of the School of Economics to come along and try in effect to have Moscoso say, \"Look, I know you probably disagree with a lot that we're doing and you are very skeptical about the Alianza para Progresso; you're very skeptical about the United States per se. Maybe in many senses you're right, maybe in the past you had reason to feel that there has been imperialism, but we want to indicate to you that we have a change of attitude and just give us a chance and I need your counsel and you're an economist and I want to know. I realize that we may disagree, but I wanted to meet you anyway.\" I think that there is a possibility that a person in his frame of mind and I say this is only a possibility and it may be very minimal as a possibility; but there is a chance that we may be able to recreate some kind of tie with him so that he is not as bitter and antagonistic. I do not think, at least from hearing that lecture, that evening that he is entirely beyond the pale; and bear in mind that there were no Americans, there was no one in the audience (that I could detect at least) who were not from El Salvador itself. I realize that there may be various opinions with respect to this, but I did suggest it to the ambassador. He thought it might be a good idea and he may very well do that.\n\nApparently the father, Jose Rodriguez Ruiz, Sr. (Napoleon), is a person who is approachable. He is not as far to the left as his son. He is a liberal, but he is not considered a Communist. There is, I understand, something in the Embassy about him, but apparently it has been checked out and it is felt that he is not a Communist. In any event, there has been an invitation extended to him to come to the United States. I think, as a matter of fact, that with many of these people that if they were to come to\nthe United States and given some kind of chance to observe the United States first hand, they would be less bitter about us. I think that they have adopted some very domestic notions about us; they believe some of what they see in the movies; kinds of snatches of newsreels about the situation in the South. Actually, they have a very distorted notion, and some of it is a very sincere distorted notion. They really believe some of the things they've heard. I think if they would see us first hand they might feel differently. Just as I think sometimes when a lot of these fellows go to Russia or Cuba, they come back disillusioned that it isn't what they have been told it is. I know that I've talked to some people in Mexico who have seen Cuba first hand during the last year and have had noticeable changes of mind as to what it is. It's one thing to hear all the good things that the leftists say about a thing, but it's another thing when you actually go there and observe some of the tyrannical atmosphere. I think the same thing is true on the reverse that you can disillusion people by sending them to Russia or to Cuba or behind the Iron Curtain. Just as sometimes you can rub away some of the misimpressions, erroneous impressions by sending people to the United States and having them live on a campus for example, such as Cambridge, Michigan, or any such place where they can see first hand that we're not the oppressors that they have been led to believe for a long time. Much of this is really lack of exposure.\n\nDuring the time that I was in El Salvador about 10 days ago, there arose a serious problem of the deportation of Salvadorans from Honduras; and it was all over the newspapers, and very strong statements were issued both in the editorials and by people over the radio about chasing out some of the Salvadorans that had been working in Honduras for a long time. Apparently there has been a rapprochement; there were meetings between the foreign ministers and I think the problem may be resolved.\n\nIt's interesting to note that El Salvador is the most heavily populated country of Central America. I think they have a population of about 120 per square mile, whereas Honduras and Nicaragua have something like 15 or 17 per square mile. Therefore, you have a very definite problem of space and overpopulation in San Salvador. The other thing is traditionally the people of San Salvador are supposed to be the hardest workers in Central America. I remember that Antonio Rivera, a very well-known attorney in San Salvador, said that the Salvadorans were referred to as the\nJapanese of Central America because they're the tough workers. Also there is a considerable amount of Salvadoran capital that is in various industries throughout Central America which is an interesting thing to me. The comparison to the Japanese seems to be very appropriate in this situation.\n\nI think that the real focus of trouble, if there is going to be any, would be either the Labor unions or I think more particularly in the University. My feelings about Central America, generally, is that your revolutions do not come from the campesinos or they do not even come from the lower classes. They generally are the middle-class groups or the low-middle-class groups. I think in Havana, for example, Batista was overthrown, not by the campesinos but by the middle classes; and then the campesinos came in afterwards because there was very little doing outside of Havana even in the Sierra Madres, there was only Castro with a small group of people. When Batista really fell is when he had so damn much trouble inside of Havana. He fled and left because he was having problems of sabotage in Havana itself and not because Castro was seriously threatening him from the Sierra Madres, for he had actually withdrawn about a month before, if you recall.\n\nI think with respect to the situation in Santo Domingo, here again Union Civica Nacional was made up by the intellectuals and by the middle classes and not by the campesinos. As a matter of fact, Trujillo has tremendous support and adulation among many of the campesinos and his real basic political strength was from the low economic groups. As a matter of fact the Secret Police was recruited from the lower barrios where he had the toughest little juvenile delinquents you could imagine as a Secret Police, and this was a real force. The interesting thing is that right after Trujillo died, the first big mass meeting that his son had was in the poorest barrio in Santo Domingo because he knew that's where Trujillo still had basic strength.\n\nI think the same thing is true in San Salvador. I don't think it will be the campesinos that will give you the trouble; it will be the students. With respect to the student situation, I think they might borrow leaf from PRI's book in dealing with the students. I think the government ought to make a very strong attempt to form a liaison with the universities and whenever they get some apt pupils to give them a job in the government, to bring them into the various positions within the government and the same thing with professors, to have them as economic advisors.\nwherever they can. They're human beings\u2014once, they'll be flattered and another thing, they'll need the money. I think one of the things that might be helpful with respect to the situation in the universities is to try and catch some of these students in the high school level. I suggested to the ambassador, a plan that would be something comparable to the Rotary Club's scholarships that are given in Colorado. I remember that when I was going through high school, I was given $10 a month by the Rotary Club and I was given a sponsor. I used to meet him once a month and we'd have lunch. I remember this very strongly because it was meaningful to me to have this kind of relationship. I think that many of the businessmen in San Salvador could get the bright young guys in the high schools who are actually the guys who become the effective leaders in the college. Get them on the high school level and become friends with them. Once they have gotten to know some of the people who are supposed to be the ogres that they later talk about, and have had some actual financial help from them; they are more apt to be approachable. At least the person who has been their sponsor during the time in high school can approach them. I think we have got to start working on this at a stage before they get to the university. Your leaders can be spotted, the people who are going to be your most effective in colleges can be spotted in the high schools. I think that is the time to start bringing some of the people in close contact with the government, also the business community. I talked to the ambassador about this and he said he felt it was a good idea and was going to talk to some of the people about it. I think, bearing in mind, that the universities are really power seats in many of the Latin American countries. We have got them to accept this as a starting point and then work with this and find out what are the elements that produce the leaders and when do the leaders first become observable and try to catch them at the earliest possible time. I think it would ameliorate much of the situation with respect to the students. The other thing (still on the university thing) I've observed in places that I have been is that the newspapers in these universities really are not newspapers. I think the leftist newspapers are really truly ineffective as far as appealing to the middle span. The same thing with the rightist, you have either the right or the left. The Catholics, generally speaking, have newspapers that are more costly; and they are very dogmatic to the right. Then you have the leftist students who have poorly printed or poorly mimeographed newspapers to the left. I suspect that the vast number of students who are in the middle never have any newspapers and here,\nI think, is a fertile field for us to get into the act. I saw a newspaper in El Salvador called the Daily News; it's an American newspaper. I don't know who is the editor of it, but it is really truly a newspaper and it's a good job. It is well edited; it is a newsy periodical and I think it could be used as a format for many of the newspapers in some of these Central American universities. In Mexico I think you would have to have a printed newspaper because there are more resources, but a lot can be done with mimeographed newspapers if they are made into newspapers. My suggestion would be that you have actual news, gossip columns in these newspapers about who is going with whom and all that sort of stuff, have student programs, have actual news about lectures that are given; and make it about two-thirds news and about only one-third editorial. Once you get people in as readers then they will read some of your editorial comment. Also it can become the organ to the middle because none of the middle groups in any of the universities I have ever seen have a newspaper that speaks for them. I think, for example, and I mentioned this to Dave Phillips and Bill Carlson in Mexico, that there isn't an effective student newspaper at the University of Mexico. This is a place where you have 83,000 students and this is the growing middle class, these are the spokesmen. They don't have a newspaper, and I think it might be a good idea, for example, to have some kind of symposium in El Salvador where you invite prospective editors of student newspapers to study the techniques of typography; to study the techniques of what makes a newspaper readable. Actually La Quincena that is published in Mexico, for example, is obviously a political tract. There isn't one single article that appears that doesn't have a political pitch, a very strong anti-leftist pitch. Frankly, it is a boring newspaper and typographically it looks very presentable; it's an expensive project. Interesting enough in the third issue of it they had a big editorial page saying we are not supported by the American Embassy. We have gathered our own funds, etc. Well, \"He thinketh thou protestest too loudly,\" is certainly true in that situation. As I understand it we are not really sponsoring the newspaper, but it has the look of it. None of these newspapers have any ads or anything of this nature. I think that when you don't have any ads or you don't have any (parental where-with-all) it is always suspected of being a paid-for newspaper. I think even in these little mimeograph sheets we could always find people who would give a nominal sum, say even a dollar a month, for just\nan ad just so you could use an ad advertising their book store or dry goods store to give it the appearance of a newspaper that is making its own go and it is not just a paid-for propaganda piece. I think there is a great need for these kinds of newspapers in all of these universities. I would be tickled to death, as a matter of fact, for I have a special interest in this thing, to give whatever help I can. I know that the Ambassador in Salvador is very interested in this. He is a former newspaper editor. He edited the student newspaper and of course it hit him immediately as a good idea. I edited a student newspaper and perhaps that is why I am especially aware of this kind of thing, but I think we've missed the boat many years in this. I think even if we have to edit the newspaper ourselves, these organs should be in the universities.\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nTO: SALVADOR\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH 8\nINFO: ADDP, PG 2, CI, CI/OPS, CI/CA, S/C 2\n\nREFERENCE: 4192* (IN 48642)\n\nAMBASSADOR AWARE TICHBORN AND NOLTENIUS ARE ACQUAINTANCES.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nRE: AMBASSADOR AWARE OF TICHBORN'S CONTACT WITH MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS JULIO MILLERINO.\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nDIR INFO MEXI CITE SALV 4142\n\nREF. DIR 15052 (act 90798)\u00b2\nSALV 4119 (NOT SENT MEXI) (2/4/62)\n\n1. MINDEF HAS INFORMED ARMY ATTACHE MATTHEWS RIVERA CANNOT\n   LEAVE BEFORE 11 JUNE.\n\n2. STATION AS YET UNABLE CONFIRM ANY NOLTENIUS TRAVEL PLANS\n   FOR IMMEDIATE FUTURE.\n\n3. HAS AMBASSADOR AWARE TICHBORN CONTACT WITH NOLTENIUS.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nCS COMMENT, *IF PRESIDENT RIVERA AND OR MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS JULIO\nNOLTENIUS COMING TO ZIRETAL, ADVISE HCS ETA. TICHBORN PLANNED CONTACT NOLTENIUS\nIN ZIRETAL FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT AND POSSIBLE INTRODUCTION TO RIVERA.\n\nR1 COPY\n1. If President Rivera and or Minister of Public Works Julio Holtzhuus coming to Zinetal, advise his ETA.\n\n2. Tichborn plans to contact Holtzhuus in Zinetal for further development and possible introduction to Rivera.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\nCONTACT REPORT\n\nMEMORANDUM: of Contact and Conversation Date 5 June 1962\n\nSUBJECT: Henry Lopez\n\n1. Messrs. Dick Onderkirk and Porter Goss contacted Subject at the Shoreham Hotel in room 506 N on 5 June to debrief him on his current travel in El Salvador. Subject will be in Washington until Thursday, 7 June. At the Subject's request a further briefing will take place Wednesday, 6 June at 0930 hours with the benefit of a tape recorder. Subject believed that there was sufficient material to warrant a detailed question and answer type discussion and stated that he preferred this form reporting.\n\n2. During the course of luncheon, at which the majority of the meeting was conducted, the following items of interest were brought out in conversation. Most topics were discussed in generalities in view of the arranged formal briefing scheduled for the following morning with a recorder.\n\n   a) Subject feels that there is a chance for real stability in the Rivera government with the proper support from the US Government.\n\n   b) Subject stated that a slight disparity existed in the direction being taken between the State Dept (Ambassador) on the one hand and the COS on the other. Specifically, Subject believed that COS was supporting elements too far to the right.\n\n   c) The military is apparently a true \"third force\" and not aligned with the U.S. families, but broken up into conservative senior officers and an emerging more liberal junior officer corps. Subject believed that there may be a possibility of getting to the campesinos through the liberal element of the military, but not to the U.S. families.\n\n   d) U.S. families are becoming isolated and have neither the full support of the church, the military, or the government. The attitude toward the minimum wage rate of the Rivera government seems to be \"pay one half as many twice as much.\" The cooperation of the U.S. families is needed for the econo...\ndevelopment of the country, but as of now they are all the way right. As for the minimum wage concept, the campesinos apparently do not grasp it a meaning.\n\ne) The church is not so far right that it supports the 1% families and it is tending more towards the relative left.\n\nf) The Alliance for Progress has been badly handled, as have some of the activities of the Peace Corps. Subject believes that too much has been promised through propaganda already without corresponding results. He believes the danger of the program falling into ridicule is great if the US continues to promise only, or continues its badly managed publicity play program.\n\ng) Discussion of the student University papers yielded Subject's opinion that they are largely ineffective because they deal in polemics rather than fact and news items, and because the ones with too good format are obviously US puppets.\n\nh) Less conversation about Fidel Castro is evident in public, although the Fidel movement is still to be reckoned with. Recently there has been a resurgence of the Martinez - dictator of the 1950's - good old days when everybody had a job. This sentiment was very expressed by some campesinos.\n\n3. Subject mentioned that he had both high and low level contacts in El Salvador and had managed to get a reading of public opinion and private belief. Apparently it is a mistake for Rivera to delay the inauguration so long after the election, at which time a favorable image of the Col was successfully kept before the public, but which is now wearing off.\n\n4. Subject proposed the following courses of action in certain fields that were discussed in more depth.\n\nc) Radio is the best means of communication with the campesinos. Subject was impressed with the results of the operation run by the Catholic priest in Bolivia using pre-beamed radios. He considers that a similar operation\nwould be extremely valuable if properly handled.\n\nb) Recommends that the Li families be approached on a millionaire to\nmillionaire basis to cooperate with a reasonable reformist movement.\n\n(c) That the son of Rodriguez, son, is head of the Economics\nDept at the University\u2014be approached by Moscoso and himself and asked\nto cooperate for at least a year's trial basis. The son is a very moving\norator, but Marxist oriented, and skeptical about the success of the\nAlliance, but not an inflammatory type\u2014would be a fair contestant in any issue.\n\nd) That an effective student/youth newspaper be developed which\nis a newspaper and not a propaganda sheet, which appeals to the student\nbody.\n\ne) That he use his newly formed contacts\u2014the Minister of Public\nWorks\u2014Julio A. \u2014 to get an introduction to Rivera when he is\nin Washington. Subject claims a very intimate relationship with Julio\nin Washington that would provide a close contact with Rivera.\nCLASSIFIED MESSAGE\n\nDATE: 4 JUN 62\n\nTO: DIRECTOR\n\nFROM: MEXICO CITY\n\nACTION: WH 8\n\nINFO: CA 2, CA/PRG, S/C 2\n\nDIR INFO SALV CITE MEXI 0977\n\nREF DIR 13809 Out 05702*\n\nTICHBORN SCHEDULED DEPART MEXI 4 JUNE WITH STOPOVER NYC, FOR\nARRIVAL HQS MORNING OF 5 JUNE. WILL PHONE 5 JUNE PER REF.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: *HQs CONCURS TICHBORN HQS CONSULTATION TO BEGIN APPROX 4 JUNE.\nTO: MEXICO CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH 8\nINFO: CA 2, CA/PRG, S/C 2\n\nREF: NSXI 2927 (IN 12609)\n\nHCS OXYGEN PARA 2 REF. ADVISE ETA. CONTACT MR. FORREST SHIVERS OR MR. AL FEDERER AT 356 8073 IN ZENTAL BETWEEN 0800 AND 1700 HOURS WEEKDAY UNTIL ARRIVAL.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nTH Consent: *Advise concurrence TICHBORN has consultation to begin approx 4 June.\n\nJ. C. KING\nC/O HD\nRELEASING OFFICER\n\nH/3/LAXCO\nH/0/PS\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nAUTHENTICATING OFFICER\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nDIR INFO SALV CITE MEXI 0927\n\nREF MEXI 0763 (34356) *\n\n1. TICHBORN RETURNED MEXI 25 MAY AFTER COMPLETING SURVEY SALV POLITICAL AND EDUCATIONAL FIELDS AND HOLDING DISCUSSIONS SALV ODACID CHIEF AND COS. TICHBORN REPORTS SALV SURVEY HIGHLY COMPLEX AND AS RECOMMENDED IN SALV, HE REQUESTS APPROX TWO DAY CONSULTATION HQS TO PRESENT HIS REPORT, DISCUSS SALV DEVELOPMENTS AND DEVISE POSSIBLE ACTION PROGRAM.\n\n2. FOR SALV HQS: ADVISE CONCURRENCE TICHBORN HQS CONSULTATION TO BEGIN APPROX 4 JUNE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nCS COMMENT: TICHBORN WOULD ARRIVE SALV 16 MAY.\n1. The Station had been aware of KELICH's association with Congressmen since 1958. Frankly, however, the Station was not aware of the extent to which KELICH engaged in political election activities until receipt of Reference and a discussion with KELICH's Headquarters is correct in considering him qualified for political action operations involving elections.\n\n2. Perhaps Station Mexico's comments were colored by the desire not to lose KELICH's services too temporarily. His cover occupation as a professor at the National University makes it difficult for him to leave classes for CIA assignments. He is also handling the Station operations. One of them, LUCAS, involves meetings with his Station officers at least three times a week. In these circumstances, such as the present student strike situation, KELICH and the Station staff officers must meet daily.\n\n3. Also pertinent is the fact that Howard C. TICHERN has qualifications in the election field which are certainly superior to KELICH's. (See RH-00417 for Headquarters evaluation.) Furthermore, Station Mexico has understood that TICHERN's assignment in Mexico was based on the premise that he would be on hand for just such assignments. Although Station Mexico is using TICHERN, it has constantly been in mind that he may be called on to travel at any moment, as he is doing this date in the States. Finally, the Station feels strongly that TICHERN is a personability better suited to such assignments.\n\n4. In summary, KELICH will be available for any assignment in any area requested by Headquarters. At the same time, Station Mexico will appreciate Headquarters consideration of TICHERN for such assignments, for the reasons stated above.\n\nVillard C. Curtis\n\n18 May 1962\n\nMatters:\n1 = OUD\n2 = Files\nRE DIR 09174 (OUT 81006)*\n\nTICHBORN WILL ARRIVE 16 MAY VIA PAA AT 1210.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/3 COMMENT: HQS CONCURRED TICHBORN TDY SALV TO REAPPRAISE POLIT SIT.\nTO: SAN SALVADOR, MEXICO-CITY\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH 8\nINFO: CA 2, CA/PRG, S/C 2\n\nTO: SALV\nINFO: NEXTI\n\nREP: SALV 4099 (IN 31340)*\n\n1. HQS CONCURS TICHBORN TDY SALV PER REP REQUEST.\n2. NEXTI: PLS ADVISE SALV DATES TICHBORN AVAILABLE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nUNI COMMENT: Ambassador Williams requests Edward G. Tichborn travel Salvador to reappraise political situation.\nDIR INFO RIOD CITE MEXI-0414\n\nALSHOOP\n\nREF: RIOD 6974 (CIV 68985)*\n\nFYI: DUE PLANNED PERSONAL BUSINESS TRIP IN LOS ANGELES FROM 2 THRU 9 APRIL, LOPEZ AVAILABLE FOR REF TRIP ANY TIME THEREAFTER.\n\nIN CONSIDERING COVER POSSIBILITIES FOR REF TRIP, HQS MAY WISH TO UTILIZE LEGITIMATE LOPEZ COVER AS LAWYER WHO NOW REPRESENTING MEXI-U.S. BUSINESS INTERESTS IN PROMOTING LA INDUSTRIAL USE NEW COFFEE BEAN REFINING MACHINE.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: *REQUESTED BACKGROUND CAPABILITIES AND COVER FOR MR. LOPEZ.\nTO: RIO DE JANEIRO\nFROM: DIRECTOR\nCONF: WH 8\nINFO: CCG 2, C1, C1/GPS, C1/0A, S/C 2\n\nPRIORITIES\n\n1. EDWARD O. TICHBORN (P) IS KUBARK CONTRACT AGENT RESIDENT MEXI.\n   BORN DENVER 1920 OF MEXICAN PARENTS, ACTIVE SEVERAL YEARS CALIFORNIA\n   STATE POLITICS MOST RECENTLY DURING KENNEDY CAMPAIGN AND AS PRESIDENT\n   YOUNG DEMOCRATS CLUB. WAS MANAGER CAMPAIGNS JAMES ROOSEVELT AND HELEN\n   GAGAN DOUGLAS IN EARLY FIFTIES AND WAS 1958 CANDIDATE FOR CALIFORNIA\n   SECRETARY OF STATE WHICH CAMPAIGN HE LOST DESPITE GETTING MORE VOTES IN\n   LOS ANGELES AREA THAN ANY DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR ANY OFFICE IN HISTORY.\n\n2. TICHBORN HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED VALUABLE POLITICAL ASSESSMENT\n   ASSIGNMENTS IN CUBA, EL SALVADOR AND DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. HE IS PERSONABLE,\n   INTELLIGENT, SHREWDED, AGGRESSIVE AND APPEARS TO HAVE WELL-DEVELOPED\n   SECURITY SENSE. HE OPERATIONALY INVOLVED MEXI BUT GENERALLY AVAILABLE FOR\n   SHORT (UP TO TWO WEEKS) ASSIGNMENTS ELSEWHERE. HIS COVERS AS INDEPENDENT\n   LAWYER WITH BUSINESS CLIENTS AND MEXI OFFICES IN LOS ANGELES AND MEXI AND AS\n   EMPLOYEE TELEVISION FILM PRODUCER MEXI GIVE HIM MOBILITY THROUGHOUT SPANISH\n\nCOORDINATING OFFICER\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nAMERICA. EGS UNABLE DETERMINE SUITABILITY HIS COVER FOR BRAZIL.\n\n3. RIOD SHOULD DECIDE FEASIBILITY USE TICHBORN BRAZIL AFTER CONSIDER-\nATION OF TICHBORN'S EVALUATION HIS COVER WHICH MOST REQUESTED CABLE RIOD\nSECRET.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nVII COMMENT: EGS REQUESTED BACKGROUND, CAPABILITIES, COVER TICHBORN.\nPRITY DIR INFO PRITY MEXI CITE RIOD 6974\n\nALSWOOP\n\nREF DIR 49629 (C/3745)\n\nSTATION DOES NOT HAVE KNOWLEDGE CAPABILITIES MR. LOPEZ.\n\nREQUESTED VISIT ON ADVICE MR. LEE SMITH WHO NO LONGER HERE.\n\nIN VIEW SERIOUS SECURITY HAZARDS NOW BECOMING EVIDENT BELIEVE\n\nLOPEZ VISIT REQUIRES DETAILED PLANNING. THEREFORE, REQUEST\n\nCABLE HIS BACKGROUND, CAPABILITIES AND COVER.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: *REQUESTED CABLE DECISION RE MOST EFFECTIVE TIME FOR LOPEZ\n\nVISIT TO BRAZIL.\n1. In February or March 1961 Subject, a contract agent (Identity under separate cover) presently based in Mexico, was sent on TDY to El Salvador to make a private evaluation of general social, economic and political conditions in that country. Upon his return, Subject wrote a lengthy report which has been useful as background information concerning El Salvador as of early 1961.\n\n2. On an official visit to El Salvador in early February 1962, the Chief, HUMINT Support, visited Ambassador Williams. The Ambassador said that he was pleased with Subject's accomplishments during the visit described in paragraph 1, above, and requested that Subject again present to El Salvador on TDY. This is the first word to reach Headquarters that the Ambassador had expressed such a desire.\n\n3. The CGS, San Salvador is requested to ascertain what specific tasks the Ambassador has in mind for Subject at this time.\n\nEND OF DISPATCH\n\nAttachment:\nIdentity, u/s/c\n\nDistribution:\n2 - San Salvador, w/att as noted\n2 - Mexico City, w/att as noted\nIDENTITY\n\nHenry Lopez\n\nSeparate cover attachment - 2025-1326\n\nDated - 26 February 1962\n\nSECRET\n| TO: | DATE | METHOD | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|-----|------|--------|-------------------|----------|\n| C/WR/3 | 2 FEB 1962 |        |                   | Please detach your copy |\n| DC/USD |      |        |                   | 1-3: I don't know why he wants copies at this time |\n| C/WR/3 |      |        |                   | 4-6: I do see me |\n|        |      |        |                   | 3 & 4: We should get the station to find out the purpose of the proposed visit |\n\nNiles - file required and force sheet in advertising charts\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, WMD\n\nSUBJECT: Request from Ambassador Williams, El Salvador\n\n1. While visiting with Ambassador Williams and the COS during my recent trip to San Salvador, the Ambassador mentioned the good work done by Mr. Henry Lopez whom the Agency had sent to El Salvador for TDY.\n\n2. The Ambassador was so pleased with the accomplishments of Mr. Lopez that he asked me to convey to you his desire that Mr. Lopez be sent again on TDY.\n\nPAUL E. ARNISON\nChief, WE Support\nDUE PERSONAL COVER BUSINESS COMMITMENTS AND RELATED SECURITY ASPECTS, TICHBORN REPORTS REF TRIP FOR APPROX TWO MONTH PERIOD EXTREMELY DIFFICULT ARRANGE. IN ADDITION, TICHBORN, IN ABSENCE RIKON, NOW HANDLING LILISP C, OTHER RELATED STUDENT OPS WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT CONTACTS. STA SUGGESTS, WITH TICHBORN CONCURRENCE, IF OP REQUIREMENTS PER REF STILL ABLE BE FULFILLED, TICHBORN COULD ARRANGE LOCAL ACTIVITIES PERMIT WEEK-TEN DAY COLOMBIAN VISIT DURING MID FEB WITH FOLLOW-UP WEEK-TEN DAY VISIT IN MARCH.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: QUERIED IF SUBJ AVAILABLE GO COLOMBIA ASSIST STA PLANNING CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10068.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 176, "total-input-tokens": 207569, "total-output-tokens": 54619, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 572, 1], [572, 1010, 2], [1010, 1010, 3], [1010, 1728, 4], [1728, 2205, 5], [2205, 3309, 6], [3309, 4101, 7], [4101, 4938, 8], [4938, 5239, 9], [5239, 6162, 10], [6162, 7210, 11], [7210, 7297, 12], [7297, 7900, 13], [7900, 9656, 14], [9656, 11420, 15], [11420, 12208, 16], [12208, 12721, 17], [12721, 13766, 18], [13766, 13766, 19], [13766, 15792, 20], [15792, 16313, 21], [16313, 16669, 22], [16669, 17307, 23], [17307, 18380, 24], [18380, 18939, 25], [18939, 20510, 26], [20510, 21644, 27], [21644, 22630, 28], [22630, 22993, 29], [22993, 23211, 30], [23211, 24900, 31], [24900, 28175, 32], [28175, 28642, 33], [28642, 29088, 34], [29088, 29461, 35], [29461, 29831, 36], [29831, 31002, 37], [31002, 33333, 38], [33333, 34616, 39], [34616, 35241, 40], [35241, 35873, 41], [35873, 37088, 42], [37088, 37444, 43], [37444, 37444, 44], [37444, 38947, 45], [38947, 39456, 46], [39456, 39671, 47], [39671, 41079, 48], [41079, 41510, 49], [41510, 43418, 50], [43418, 44508, 51], [44508, 46726, 52], [46726, 47850, 53], [47850, 50139, 54], [50139, 51101, 55], [51101, 51558, 56], [51558, 52595, 57], [52595, 53081, 58], [53081, 54190, 59], [54190, 54811, 60], [54811, 55778, 61], [55778, 57126, 62], [57126, 57781, 63], [57781, 58023, 64], [58023, 59183, 65], [59183, 59230, 66], [59230, 60260, 67], [60260, 60802, 68], [60802, 61800, 69], [61800, 62138, 70], [62138, 63788, 71], [63788, 66554, 72], [66554, 66694, 73], [66694, 67576, 74], [67576, 69023, 75], [69023, 71048, 76], [71048, 71356, 77], [71356, 72504, 78], [72504, 73767, 79], [73767, 73978, 80], [73978, 74314, 81], [74314, 74460, 82], [74460, 75319, 83], [75319, 76305, 84], [76305, 77363, 85], [77363, 77620, 86], [77620, 77862, 87], [77862, 78864, 88], [78864, 79824, 89], [79824, 80327, 90], [80327, 81306, 91], [81306, 82002, 92], [82002, 83078, 93], [83078, 84720, 94], [84720, 85319, 95], [85319, 85570, 96], [85570, 85791, 97], [85791, 87118, 98], [87118, 87671, 99], [87671, 87983, 100], [87983, 88587, 101], [88587, 89059, 102], [89059, 89531, 103], [89531, 90692, 104], [90692, 91658, 105], [91658, 92078, 106], [92078, 93429, 107], [93429, 94374, 108], [94374, 95095, 109], [95095, 95536, 110], [95536, 96834, 111], [96834, 97523, 112], [97523, 98743, 113], [98743, 99274, 114], [99274, 100050, 115], [100050, 101207, 116], [101207, 102300, 117], [102300, 102915, 118], [102915, 104746, 119], [104746, 105687, 120], [105687, 106019, 121], [106019, 106316, 122], [106316, 106489, 123], [106489, 107211, 124], [107211, 107543, 125], [107543, 108204, 126], [108204, 108802, 127], [108802, 109029, 128], [109029, 109552, 129], [109552, 110344, 130], [110344, 110821, 131], [110821, 111903, 132], [111903, 112593, 133], [112593, 112876, 134], [112876, 113577, 135], [113577, 115403, 136], [115403, 116343, 137], [116343, 116917, 138], [116917, 117335, 139], [117335, 119760, 140], [119760, 122251, 141], [122251, 124932, 142], [124932, 127865, 143], [127865, 130423, 144], [130423, 133084, 145], [133084, 135553, 146], [135553, 138038, 147], [138038, 140463, 148], [140463, 143034, 149], [143034, 145636, 150], [145636, 148230, 151], [148230, 150800, 152], [150800, 153589, 153], [153589, 156257, 154], [156257, 157106, 155], [157106, 157474, 156], [157474, 158045, 157], [158045, 158279, 158], [158279, 160202, 159], [160202, 162071, 160], [162071, 163014, 161], [163014, 163392, 162], [163392, 163903, 163], [163903, 164456, 164], [164456, 166221, 165], [166221, 166380, 166], [166380, 166744, 167], [166744, 167250, 168], [167250, 168470, 169], [168470, 168772, 170], [168772, 169241, 171], [169241, 170272, 172], [170272, 170367, 173], [170367, 170912, 174], [170912, 171391, 175], [171391, 172007, 176]]}}
{"id": "d1b9dd7f3866fdb56f1b6b9a9610afec5fb44680", "text": "FILE TITLE/NUMBER/VOLUME:  LOPEZ, HENRY P.\n201-253203\nVOL. IV\n\nINCLUSIVE DATES: ____________________________\n\nCUSTODIAL UNIT/LOCATION: ____________________________\n\nROOM: ____________________________\n\nDELETIONS, IF ANY: ____________________________\n\n| DATE RECEIVED | DATE RETURNED | REVIEWED BY (PRINT NAME) | SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL |\n|---------------|---------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 11/5/76       | 11/5/76       | 1/4/77                    |                                |\n\nNO DOCUMENTS MAY BE COPIED OR REMOVED FROM THIS FILE\nPRITY DIR MEXI CITE TRUJ 1006\n\nREF DIR 00793 (OUT 76/77) **\n\n1. DO NOT HAVE REF. ASSUME THIS IS LOPEZ IF SO CONCUR.\n\n2. THE EXILE MOVEMENT IS LIVING MAINLY IN HOTEL COMMERCIAL.\n\nSUBJ MAY WISH MINGLE WITH THIS TYPE. LOCATION CLOSE TO SPORADIC\nPOLITICAL ACTIVITY IN COLON PARK.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENTS: DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE TO YOUR 4 CABLES.\n\n**HOS STATED IT WOULD LIKE EDWARD G. TICHBORN TO RETURN TO DOMINICAN REPUBLIC\nSOONEST TO STUDY SITUATION IN DEPTH.\n\n201-253203\nDIR INFO TRUJ CITE MEXI 8499\nRE DIR 02142 (out 77356)\n\nTICHBORN AVAILABLE MAKE REF TRIP DEPARTING MEXI 30 JULY.\nSINCE TICHBORN HAS COVER BUSINESS CLIENTS NYC, WILL MAKE CIRCUITOUS\nROUTE TO HQS VIA NYC INSTEAD LOS ANGELES. WILL LAY OVER NYC 30\nJULY AT STATLER HOTEL, ARRIVE WASH MORNING 31 JULY AND CONTACT HQS\nTHAT TIME.\n\nC/S COMMENT: *ACTION UNIT DETERMINED AS THOUGH INDICATOR DIVOUR 4 CABLES.\nPRITY DIR MEXI CITE TRUJ 1025\n\nREP MEXI 8435 (CIN40025)\n\nDYVOUR\n\n1. STATION AGREES TOURIST COVER NOT SUFFICIENT PERMIT EXTENDED\n\nSTAY DOM: REP FOR POLITICAL STUDY IN DEPTH. ESSENTIAL TICHBORN HAVE\nADEQUATE BACKSTOPPED COVER TO JUSTIFY HIS TASK WITH VARIOUS POLITICAL\nTYPES BOTH IN GOVT AND IN OPPOSITION.\n\n2. TARGETS OF INTEREST ARE POL: UNION CIVICA NACIONAL; 14TH\nOF JUNE MOVEMENT; MOVIMIENTO POPULAR DOMINICANO (PRO CASTRO); PARTIDO\nREVOLUCIONARIO DOMINICANO; AND PARTIDO DOMINICANO.\n\n3. JOURNALIST COVER WOULD GIVE BEST ACCESS.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nC/S COMMENT: RE-LIBELER ATTEMPTS MAKE COVER ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMREP TRIP.\n\nSECRET\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nPRITY DIR MEXI CITE TRUJ 1005\nREF DIR 00793 (OUT 76177) 5*\n\n1. DO NOT HAVE REF. ASSUME THIS IS LOPEZ IF SO CONCUR.\n2. THE EXILE MOVEMENT IS LIVING MAINLY IN HOTEL COMMERCIAL.\nSUBJ MAY WISH MINGLE WITH THIS TYPE. LOCATION CLOSE TO SPORADIC\nPOLITICAL ACTIVITY IN COLON PARK.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n\nG/S COMMENTS: *DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE TO YOUR 4 CABLES.\n*HAS STATED IT WOULD LIKE EDWARD G. TICHBORN TO RETURN TO DOMINICAN REPUBLIC\nSOONEST TO STUDY SITUATION IN DEPTH.\n\n201-211699\n433303\n\n201-25-3203\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. Copy No\nFRITY TRUJ DIR CITE MEXI 8435\n\n1. DUE PREVIOUS BUSINESS/TRAVEL COMMITMENTS, TICHBORN UNABLE\nMAKE REF TRIP UNTIL LAST WEEK JULY. T WILLING GO DOMREP THAT TIME\nBUT FEELS TOURIST COVER TOO LIGHT FOR EXTENDED TRUJ VISIT TO OBTAIN\nSITREP IN DEPTH AS REQUESTED, PARTICULARLY IN VIEW SMALLNESS AND TIGHT\nSECURITY OF TARGET CITY. (10 2630)\n\n2. FYI PER MEXI-8235, LIBELER STILL ATTEMPTING MAKE COVER\nARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMREP TRIP. MEXICAN NEWSPAPERS REFUSED GRANT HIM\nCOVER DOCUMENTATION AS SPECIAL REPORTER, BUT IT NOW POSSIBLE HE\nABLE ARRANGE COVER BACKSTOPPING AND INTERVIEWS/ENTREES WITH TOP\nDOMREP OFFICIALS USING HIS PAST BACKGROUND AS MEXICAN INDEPENDENT\nWRITER AND BOOK AUTHOR OF LA POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND PERSONALITIES.\nL EXPECTS FINAL COVER AND TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS WITHIN NEXT SEVEN DAYS.\n(10 3842)\n\n3. STA ATTEMPTING FINALIZE LITEA-1 DOMREP ASSIGNMENT PER MEXI-8416.\n\n4. IN VIEW T'S COVER LIMITATIONS PER PARA 1 ABOVE, ADVISE SOONEST\nHQ'S VIEWS RE DESIRABILITY T MAKE TRIP.\n\nREQUESTS HQS REQUIRE-\nMENTS INDICATED REF FOR POSSIBLE USE TICHBORN, LIBELER, AND LITEA-1\nTRAVEL TO DOMREP. (END OF MESSAGE)\n\nC/S COMMENT: *DISSEMINATION APPLICABLE TO DYOURL 4 CABLES.\n\nREPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED.\nSPEED LETTER\n\n| TO: | N/12/S |\n|-----|--------|\n| FROM: | OSG-OC, 2 H 18, Hes |\n\nSUBJECT: LOPES, Henry P.\n\nA review of OSG/OC records indicates Subject has an Operational Approval which is five years old or older. Updating the OA is required at this time. If updating is required, OSG/OC will need the following:\n\na. Updated PRQ 1\u2014new information reflecting changes in address, employment, family status, etc. (There is normally no need to submit a complete new PRQ 1 form.)\n\nb. Updated traces together with current operational use and area of use.\n\nNote: 1. PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE SQUARE BELOW AND RETURN TO OSG/OC.\n\n2. The existing OA will continue in effect until updating is completed and your office notified of results.\n\nREPLY\n\n| DATE |\n|------|\n|      |\n\n1. [ ] Active case. Agent is currently being utilized. (If case requires updating, Dask will forward update traces and PRQ 1 to OSG/OC.)\n\n2. [ ] Inactive case. Agent is no longer active and OA should be cancelled and OSG/OC folder returned.\n\n3. [ ] An Office of Security approval has superseded the OA which is thus no longer required. Please cancel OA and return folder. (Please specify type of current OS clearance. CSC, Other.)\n\nCSC [ ], Other [ ]\n\n01/01/84\n\nRESPONDENT'S FILE\n\nCONFIDENTIAL\nDecember 19, 1968\n\nMt. Miguel Tirado\n2925 Waverley Drive\nLos Angeles, California\n\nDear Friend,\n\nMerry Christmas!\n\nI regret that it has taken this long to settle the matter of your letter of September 22, 1968, but better late than never, I guess. Although your efforts in our behalf with Hank were not successful, we do appreciate the fact that you and your wife went out of your way to try to help us.\n\nI referred the matter of your late moving bill to the appropriate individual. Unfortunately, this bill was received too late, as all your accounts had been settled. He has asked me to extend his regrets on this matter.\n\nPlease accept my best wishes for a Joyous Christmas and the hope that 1969 will indeed be a good year for you and yours.\n\nSincerely,\n\nGale\n\nEnclosure: $267.00 Check\nMorgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York\n\nNew York, December 17, 1968\n\nPay\n\nTo the order of MIGUEL TIRADO\n\nNOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS\n\nAuthorized Signature\n\n267 AND 00CTS\n| No. | Officer | Date     | Comments |\n|-----|---------|----------|----------|\n| 1   | Mr. Allen | 22 Nov 1945 | 2-3 This is the first time since 1938. The letter was not made. Do you think it could be used for Oct. 1946? |\n| 2   |          |          |          |\n| 3   |          |          |          |\n| 4   |          |          |          |\n| 5   |          |          |          |\n| 6   |          |          |          |\n| 7   |          |          |          |\n| 8   |          |          |          |\n| 9   |          |          |          |\n| 10  |          |          |          |\n| 11  |          |          |          |\n| 12  |          |          |          |\n\nIn reply: [Signature] 2/1/46\n1. This office has been advised that the above named individual commenced on the rolls of Agent Cover Staff as of Oct. 31, 1968.\n\n2. The Social Security Act requires that Social Security earnings be reported to the Agency on which Social Security earnings were received. These Social Security Act credits will be reported to Office of CIA-IA-Contract Agents Accounts Section because of the individual's current status at the time these were earned.\n\n3. It is requested that all Social Security Act credits be reported to Office of CIA-IA-Contract Agents Accounts Section because of the individual's current status at the time these were earned.\n\n4. Please indicate by signing in the appropriate space whether subject's earnings may be reported with:\n\n   (a) CIA as the employer\n\n   (b) Army as the employer\n\n   (c) An ostensible non-official employer\n\n   (d) Central Cover Staff\n\n   (e) Other\n\n   Signature\n\n   Address:\n\n   Central Cover Staff\n\n   Then an ostensible employer is to be selected; the operating division will also indicate the general type of business activity in the area in which the individual could have been employed, and Central Cover Staff will furnish this office the full name and address of an appropriate ostensible employer.\n\n5. Prompt attention to this matter is necessary in the interest of final closing of subject's personnel accounting. A copy of this letter of 27 November 1968 is established for furnishing the information required.\n\n   Signature\n\n   Contract Agents Accounts Section\n22 October 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: OF/GSTD/GAAS\n\nTHROUGH: DJ/Personnel\n\nSUBJECT: Contract Agent Cover Report for Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\nContract Agent Edward G. TICHBORN (P) was paid by his cover company, WUSALINE, $17,000 in calendar year 1967 and $11,333.28 for the period 1 January to 31 August 1968. He was also upon termination paid through a second DO cover company a one-time lump sum taxable payment of $3,111.00. The latter payment was made on 12 September 1968. TICHBORN's effective termination date was 31 August 1968.\n\nGale W. Allen\nDO/CD/G\n\nCC: DO/Personnel\n| TO: | OFFICER DESIGNATION, ROOM NUMBER, AND BUILDING | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |\n|-----|-----------------------------------------------|------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| 1.  | C/E/IB                                        |      |                   |                                                  |\n| 2.  | 6/00/CO                                      | 14/10|                   |                                                  |\n| 3.  | DO/CO/C                                       |      |                   |                                                  |\n|     | 210C Key Building                            |      |                   |                                                  |\n|     | ATTN: Gale W. Allen                          |      |                   |                                                  |\n\n**FROM:** Christopher D. Costanzo\n\n**E/IB**\n\n**482607**\n\n**1564**\n\n**14 October 1968**\nMEMORANDUM FOR: DO/CO/C\nATTENTION: Gale W. Allen\nSUBJECT: Howard T. FAZZARE\nREFERENCE: Your Memorandum dated 26 September 1968.\n\n1. In the reference you stated that DO will send FAZZARE a sterile check for his expenses incurred in his efforts to persuade TICHBURN's wife to agree to an assignment in Spain. You also forwarded a bill which FAZZARE sent for additional air freight expenses from Madrid for which he has not been reimbursed.\n\n2. EUR does not wish to reimburse FAZZARE for this claim. When he resigned from the Agency he submitted his final accounting and signed a Quit-Claim for all expenses. In his note to you, a copy of which you forwarded with reference, he asked that you forward his bill \"to the Spanish Section for reimbursement if not too late...\" We would appreciate it if you could send FAZZARE a note when you forward his sterile check and state that we are sorry but this final accounting has been completed, that the books have been cleared, and that it is indeed too late to authorize additional funds.\n\nChristopher D. Costanzo\nE/IB\nMEMORANDUM\n\nTo: NPL\nCC: JOT /\nFrom: RHO 'N'\n\nSubject: Advances\n\nAttached are summaries of advances received by you from TCA, ICAP and Devco for the major portion of 1967 and all of 1968 and of the accountings submitted by you for these advances.\n\nThe net result is as follows:\n\n| Company | Net Balance Due |\n|---------|-----------------|\n| ICAP    | $179.93         |\n| TCA     | ($11.00)        |\n| DEVCO   | $33.45          |\n\nTotal due from NPL $202.38\n\nI am also returning the various xerox copies of accountings belonging to you.\n\nUnfortunately, although you have given us a summary of the accountings for the January and February 1968 TCA advances of $500. - each, we still find no record of the detail of these accountings in our files.\n\nPlease review the attached and discuss with myself or John Trask at your convenience.\n| Date                  | Description                                      | Advances | Trip Expense | Additional Payment |\n|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------|--------------------|\n| January 2, 1967       |                                                  | $500.00  |              |                    |\n| June 22, 1967 (via TCA)|                                                  | 1,200.00 |              |                    |\n| September 8, 1967     | Trip to Puerto Rico                              | (500.00) | $509.75      | $9.75              |\n|                       | February 12 to 17, 1967                          |          |              |                    |\n| September 30, 1967    | Trip to Washington, D.C.                         | (39.45)  | 39.45        |                    |\n|                       | June 21 and 22, 1967                             |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Madrid, Paris etc.                       | (458.83) | 458.83       |                    |\n|                       | June 25 to July 16, 1967                         |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Washington, D.C.                         | (53.60)  | 53.60        |                    |\n|                       | August 5 and 6, 1967                             |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Washington, D.C.                         | (80.60)  | 80.60        |                    |\n|                       | September 9, 1967                               |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Washington, D.C.                         | (31.80)  | 31.80        |                    |\n|                       | September 12 and 13, 1967                        |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Boston, Mass.                            | (99.88)  | 99.88        |                    |\n|                       | September 22 to 25, 1967                         |          |              |                    |\n| October 2, 1967       | Received from HPL                                | (435.84) |              |                    |\n|                       | Subtotal                                         | $0.00    | $1,273.91    | $9.75              |\n| October 16, 1967      |                                                  | 500.00   |              |                    |\n| December 31, 1967     | Trip to Mexico-Los Angeles-Texas                 | (447.93) | 447.93       |                    |\n|                       | October 17 to October 27, 1967                   |          |              |                    |\n| June 14, 1968         |                                                  | 75.00    |              |                    |\n| June 25, 1968         |                                                  | 600.00   |              |                    |\n| September 11, 1968    | Trip to Los Angeles                              | (452.92) | 452.92       |                    |\n|                       | July 1 to July 9, 1968                           |          |              |                    |\n|                       | Trip to Washington, D.C.                         | (94.22)  | 94.22        |                    |\n|                       | July 9 to July 11 and August 6 and August 7, 1968|          |              |                    |\n|                       | BALANCE DUE ICAP                                  | $179.93  | $2,268.98    | $9.75              |\n| Description                                      | Amount  |\n|-------------------------------------------------|---------|\n| Remainder of October 16, 1967 Advance           | $52.07  |\n| June 14, 1968 Advance                           | $75.00  |\n| Remainder of June 25, 1968 Advance              | $52.86  |\n| **Total**                                       | **$179.93** |\n| Date                  | Advances | Trip Expense | Additional Payment |\n|-----------------------|----------|--------------|--------------------|\n| January 9, 1968       | $500.00  |              |                    |\n| February 21, 1968     | 500.00   |              |                    |\n| April 18, 1968 (via ICAP) | 250.00  |              |                    |\n| June 13, 1968         |          | (250.00)     | $308.18            |\n| Trip to Los Angeles   |          |              | $124.08            |\n| April 17 to 21, 1968  |          |              |                    |\n| August 20, 1968       | 50.00    |              |                    |\n| September 10, 1968    |          | (44.38)      | 44.38              |\n| Trip to Cambridge, Mass. |        |              |                    |\n| August 13 to 15, 1968 |          |              |                    |\n| Received from HPL     |          | (5.62)       |                    |\n| September 30, 1968    |          | (474.00)     | 474.00             |\n| Trip to Caracas, Venezuela |      |              |                    |\n| January 1968          |          |              |                    |\n| Trip to Caracas, Venezuela |      |              |                    |\n| February 1968         | (537.00) | 537.00       |                    |\n| BALANCE DUE HPL       | ($11.00) | $1,363.56    | $124.08            |\n\n**DETAIL OF BALANCE DUE HPL**\n\n- Remaining Balance of January 9, 1968 Advance: $26.00\n- Excess on February 1968 Caracas Trip Accounting over Advance: (37.00)\n- ($11.00)\nOctober 16, 1967 - Advance $250.00\n\nDecember 31, 1967\nTrip to Mexico-Los Angeles-Mexico\nOctober 17 to October 27, 1967 (216.55)\n\nBALANCE DUE DEVOCO $33.45\nMEMORANDUM FOR: RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBRINY - Termination Settlement with Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\n1. The undersigned on 12 September 1968 went to New York to effect a termination settlement with Edward G. TICHBORN (P). A hotel room at the Shoreham Hotel, 33 West 53rd Street, was obtained for a meeting place. There were two principal aspects to the settlement:\n\n   a. secure TICHBORN's acceptance of an amendment to his contract providing for a one-time lump sum taxable payment of $3311.00 and releasing the U.S. Government from any further claim and,\n\n   b. insure that TICHBORN had, as of 31 August 1968, administratively severed his relationship with WUSALINE, particularly that his accountings for expenses incurred in 1968 were submitted, recorded by WUSALINE, and certified correct and proper by both TICHBORN and WUBRINY/II.\n\n2. The first part of the settlement went smoothly. TICHBORN on 12 September 1968 readily accepted the amendment to his basic contract. He brought along for the Covert Tax Unit a copy of his 1966 income tax return which the undersigned had stipulated as a requirement for settlement. He was given his one-time lump sum taxable payment of $3311 in two checks ($2833.62 and $477.38) drawn on a D0 proprietary company (WUTACTIC) which will issue TICHBORN a Form 1099 for income tax filing. He readily endorsed and gave to the undersigned the check for $477.38 in settlement of the amount he owed WH Division from his tour in Mexico City.\n\n3. Through no fault of TICHBORN, the administrative severance from WUSALINE did not go as smoothly. In spite of several requests by both TICHBORN and the undersigned,\nWUBRINY/11 did not have ready a list of expenses incurred by TICHBORN in 1968 for checking by the undersigned and certification by TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11. WUBRINY/11 telephoned to say that his accountant was unable to locate some of TICHBORN's accountings. The undersigned then requested WUBRINY/11 to join him and TICHBORN. The undersigned had a partial list of TICHBORN's expenses previously submitted by WUBRINY/11. The undersigned enjoined TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 to prepare a complete list of expenses for 1968. TICHBORN was asked to record the purpose of each expense. The undersigned emphasized in WUBRINY/11's presence that TICHBORN should ensure that no expenses chargeable to WUBRINY/11's private firm were charged to WUSALINE. Both TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 were reminded that all expenses on the Venezuela project were chargeable to WUBRINY/11's private firm as well as one-half of the expenses on the Mexican Border project. TICHBORN said that he would get all of the accountings from WUBRINY/11's comptroller to determine which, if any, accountings were missing and, as requested, to note the purpose of the expenses. It was agreed to meet the following morning of September 13, 1968 on this matter.\n\n4. On the morning of September 13, 1968, TICHBORN telephoned the undersigned to say that he was able from his records to supply the missing data. He also said that notations on the records obtained from the comptroller showed that he had, in fact, submitted the accountings that were missing. TICHBORN concluded from this that WUBRINY/11's private firm had lost the missing accountings. TICHBORN also said that a few of the charges on the partial list of expenses which the undersigned had given him to review should have been charged to WUBRINY/11's private firm. The undersigned then requested TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 to meet with him at noon so that the undersigned could review the accountings and obtain certifications from TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11. Both agreed to the meeting. Subsequently, TICHBORN telephoned to say that he and WUBRINY/11 were all set to come to the undersigned's hotel when the unwitting comptroller took all the financial statements to review them again. TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 were in no position to retain the statements and thus could not meet as scheduled. Both TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 agreed that the accountings were now in order. The undersigned again informed TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 by phone that each must certify that the expenses were proper charges to WUSALINE. WUBRINY/11 was instructed to mail the list to the undersigned as soon as possible.\n5. Certain other administrative matters were taken up with TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 during the afternoon of 12 September 1968. The undersigned secured agreement from TICHBORN and WUBRINY/11 that TICHBORN's services on WUBRINY/1's Venezuela project were as great as any other officer who worked on it and that, therefore, WUSALINE should receive for TICHBORN's services on this project compensation at least equal to that given any officer in WUBRINY/1's private firm. The undersigned obtained from TICHBORN the two credit cards (American Express and Pan American air travel card) issued to him under WUSALINE sponsorship. The undersigned asked TICHBORN if he had charged any expenses under these cards since 31 August 1968. TICHBORN said that he had entertained a movie producer who visited him as an outgrowth of his trip to California to develop a movie adjunct to his cover. For this reason, TICHBORN opined that the Agency should pay for the expense. The undersigned said that TICHBORN was not authorized to incur any further expenses after 31 August 1968. TICHBORN then readily agreed to pay the expense.\n\n6. There is a possibility that WH Division may want TICHBORN to take an operational TDY in Chile. TICHBORN was alerted to this possibility. He expressed interest in the assignment, but pointed out that he now has to get a job and that, consequently, his availability will depend upon his job situation.\n\n7. TICHBORN was extremely friendly and cooperative and the settlement was amicably effected.\n\nGale W. Allen\nDO/CO/C\n\nGWA/ekw\n\nOrig - TICHBORN file\n1 - C/DOCO, DC/DO, C/DO\n1 - WUBRINY chrono\n\nSECRET\nMEMORANDUM FOR: The Record\n\nSUBJECT: Project NURACTIC - Funding Through WICAMP\n\n1. On Monday afternoon, the undersigned was requested by Mr. Gale Allen, DO/CO, to provide a mechanism for funding $3,311.00 to an agent he was terminating (Edward G. Tichborn (P)). Mr. Allen is traveling to New York on Thursday, 12 September 1968 and would like to pay the termination bonus to Tichborn at that time. Prior to our discussion, Mr. Allen had arranged for the funds to be paid by sterile check. However, Mr. Randall, DO/RF, suggested that he consult DO/CM for a funding mechanism in order to insure proper tax reporting by Tichborn.\n\n2. Mr. Allen explained to the undersigned that Tichborn had been employed, until his termination, by one of the Project WUSBNY entities. Apparently, there is an unwitting comptroller in the WUSBNY entity and there was no reasonable story that could be offered to explain the $3,311.00 termination bonus. Therefore, it is necessary to use another entity that can provide a Form 1099 for tax purposes.\n\n3. Since WICAMP has sufficient funds in its bank account to manage a $3,311.00 disbursement, it was decided to utilize this company. Mr. Allen was advised to stop the sterile check process and to have the $3,311.00 voucher approved and forwarded to DO/CM for payment instructions. At that time, the undersigned will prepare a Request for Advance of Funds (NURACTIC) in the amount of $689.00 and Payment Instructions for $4,000.00 ($3,311.00 plus $689.00). This procedure is being followed in order that WICAMP can show a slight profit as well as to prevent the exact same amount of money being received and disbursed.\n4. GOODBEE was advised of the above and will have the funds ready for Mr. Allen on Thursday morning for his pick-up. GOODBEE was also provided TICHIBORN's address and Social Security Number for the preparation of the Form 1099.\n\nDonald G. Lemieux\nDO/CM\nalso served as the Paris-based correspondent for several Brazilian publications. He was recruited in 1958 and has successfully performed difficult operational tasks in China, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, Brazil, and the USSR. VINDICO/1, who projects himself as a left-wing correspondent, is the representative of Italian, Swiss, and Canadian publications and is currently in contact with a number of U.S. representatives. He is available for temporary foreign assignments and is fluent in Spanish, Portuguese, German, French, and English. VINDICO/1 is a reliable, productive intelligence agent who is still in eliciting information and assessing targets of interest.\n\nC. ALAMO/1 (Identity C) who is now second in command of the ministry mentioned in Reference A, and has become extremely busy during the past year, especially in all administrative work in the ministry. Although he still has wide access contacts and daily contact with leading members of the government party, his recent promotion has been greatly facilitated and his present capabilities now limit the political action field. It is believed that he can understand the situation in Chile.\n\nIt is reported that TICHECO and VINDICO/1 would be the most desirable candidates.\n\nSylvia B. Johnson\n\nDistribution:\n3 - COI, Santiago\n\nAttachment:\nIdentity, a/e/a\nSECRET\n\nUnder separate cover attachment to:\n\nEC-3-7409\n\n6 September 1968\n\nIDENTIFIED\n\nA. Henry F. Lopez\nB. Louis H. Vlachos\nC. Antonio F. Ponce Fabre\u00f1o\n\nSECRET\n\nSECRET\n| FROM | AC/DO  \n|      | Rm. 3-C-19 Hqs. |\n| TO  | C/DO/COG  \n|     | Rm. 210 - Key Bldg. |\n|     | Mr. Allen  \n|     | 19 Aug 68 |\n|     | 2833.34  \n|     | 477.38  \n|     | 3310.72  \n|     | Tuchman 201 |\n|     | 201-253203 |\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Contract Personnel Division\n\nTHROUGH: Assistant for Non-Staff Personnel\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (P) - Contract Agent\n\n1. Subject has been given 30 days notice as provided in his contract, to the effect that his contract will be terminated 31 August 1968.\n\n2. Subject was initially employed in 1959 and was transferred to DO Division in July of 1967 from the WH Division. In the course of discussing the termination of his services, subject stated that during his tenure with the WH Division, he had been promised certain bonuses upon termination of his Agency service. The WH Division has agreed to a termination payment of $3,370.72 which represents two months' salary of a per annum salary of $17,000 plus $277.18 in settlement of his accounting which is non-taxable.\n\n3. In addition it is requested that the following statement be included in the amendment:\n\nYou release and forever discharge the United States Government and any Agency, Department or Instrumentality thereof and its agents, officers, employees and representatives from any and all claims, demands and liabilities in any form or by any party whatsoever throughout the world arising from services performed by you for the United States Government under said contract.\n\n4. Attached is signed Notice of Termination in duplicate.\n\n[Signature]\nW. T. MONTGOMERY\nChief, DO Support Group\n\nAttachment: as stated\n\nDistribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee, 1 - Asst for Non-Staff Pers., 1 - DO/PERS\n1 - WH/BF, 3 - DO/SG, DC/DO/SG/Im\n1 - DO/CO/Allen\nMEMO TO: AG\nFROM: LH (TICH BORN)\nIN RE: Meetings with KT re Spain\n\nI had several long conversations with KT regarding various aspects of potential assignment in Spain:\n\na) long confab over two drinks after our joint session Wednesday afternoon;\nb) shorter talk on plane ride to New York;\nc) extended conversation on Thursday evening, when we had dinner with our respective spouses - 6:30 PM to 2:00 AM.\n\nOur many hours together (with and without our wives) produced two principal conclusions:\n\n1. Reinforced my wife's objections to moving to Spain, also convincing me that it would be prejudicial for my children.\n\n2. Convinced me that, even if there were no family objections to moving, it would be unwise to establish permanent residence in Spain because of the security risks involved therein. Both KT and I feel that several in-and-out trips would accomplish our purposes without running the risk of appearing implausible in that traditionally-suspicious country.\nA. Family objections to moving:\n\n1. Health hazards - My wife's fears about hepatitis and other diseases (originally aroused by Mike's casual reference to same) were amply reinforced by MT and wife's pointed cautions about food and water.\n\n2. Negative effect on my children - When my wife explained Greg's school difficulties since moving from Mexico (he failed three subjects last semester and is attending summer school), both MT and wife flatly said that it would be risky and perhaps permanently damaging to move him once again. Mrs. T, who is a professional guidance counselor for children, fully agreed with the child psychologist who has advised us against moving Greg out of the United States at this time. Having fallen behind in his reading skills while in Mexico (i.e., in relation to U.S. standards), he's now suffering certain psychological setbacks that are related to his scholastic difficulties.\n\nB. Security risks of projected cover:\n\nEven if there were no family objections to our moving to Spain, my conversations with MT have convinced me that our present \"cover arrangements\" will not support permanent residence in Spain.\nAs I had previously surmised, MT says that Spain is an inordinately suspicious country - that almost everyone suspects all foreigners of some ties with foreign banks. He himself was frequently told to his face that he was a bank employee, and he told us that at our two meetings last Tuesday and Wednesday. He says that government officials and the kind of higher-up business tycoons we're shooting for (he saw our list) are almost pathological in their suspicions.\n\nMT: \"You're going to have to live like a rich man to have access to those people, and no rich man would move to Spain with his family unless he had already established the kind of business activity that would pay him enough to warrant such a move. Here prospecting for business opportunities might draw such a man for short look-around visits, but he would look pretty foolish moving his whole family just to 'prospect.' Those sharp-nosed Spanish industrialists would smell you out within a few months, perhaps a few weeks.\"\n\nMT agrees with all of us that the movie cover offers the best and least-expensive chance for penetration, but here again he argues against establishing perman\nResidence:\n\n\"My father and brother (president of Associated Distributors of Spanish-Speaking Films) have been in motion pictures all their lives, and I know from my peripheral exposure to the business that no producer would establish permanent residence unless he's actually filming a big picture. Until he actually starts shooting, the producer flies in and out of the country, rushing back to Hollywood or New York to work on other picture deals. Movie people are expected to be jet-setty; they don't travel with their goddamned families, certainly not kids. As a \"bachelor\" producer with a temporary suite at the Hilton or Ritz, where you could invite Mr. Tycoon to mingle with starlets and models, you could be quite plausible as a guy who's still looking for the right picture deal to jell (perhaps for a couple of years)....\"\n\nIn view of our previous inactive relationship with our Iberian associate (and Mike's continued skepticism), I frankly agree with ET's reservations about establishing permanent residence while in the \"prospecting stage.\" The over-all prospects and utility of Paci amistades (also TCA) could be compromised by an implausible cover at any stage.\n| FROM: | SD/3/OSD | ROOM G-E-Z3 |\n|-------|----------|-------------|\n| TO:   |          |             |\n| DATE  |          |             |\n| OFFICER'S INITIALS |          |             |\n| COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |          |             |\n\n1. Chief 0005\n2. Mr. Jones\n3. Mr. Smith\n4. Mr. Brown\n5. Mr. Johnson\n6. Mr. Davis\n7. Mr. Williams\n8. Mr. Martin\n9. Mr. Anderson\n10. Mr. Johnson\n11. Mr. Brown\n12. Mr. Smith\n13. Mr. Jones\n14. Mr. Martin\n15. Mr. Anderson\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief DODS\nATTENTION: James Wright\nSUBJECT: LETTER ADDRESS\n# 306 312\n\n1. With reference to your verbal request of 14 June 1968, the following action was taken concerning facility\nPost Office Box 432, Church Street Station, New York City, New York\nCancelled\n\nx Added as co-addressee\n\nEnrico Cortez\n\nDeleted as coaddressee\n\n2. Any inquiries concerning the above action should be directed to the Special Facilities Desk of this Office, Room GE 73, Headquarters, extension 6851.\n\n[Signature]\nDeputy Director of Security (IOS)\nTichborne Greenhist\nreferred # 189405\non 26/June/85.\n\n[Signature]\nSECRET 251314Z JUN 68 CITE MADRE 5\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 09586\n\nESTIMATE IMPORT DUTY AT $1,500. IN ADDITION\nTHERE WILL BE 22 1/2 PER CENT LUXURY TAX ASSESSED\nON VEHICLE BASED ON VALUE APPRAISED BY SPANISH\nCUSTOMS. SUGGEST PROJECT ESTIMATE OF $2,000.\nTO COVER ALL IMPORT COSTS.\n\nSECRET\n\nBY\n\nTickborn\n\nSECRET\n\n201.253.203\nSECRET\n\nMADRID\n\n24 22 42z JUN 68\n\nCITATION DIRECTOR 10834\n\nQUHELP\n\nREF: A. DIRECTOR 09712\nB. MADRID 5263 (IN 36209)\n\n1. SYMPATHIZE WITH FAZZARE DESIRE CONSUMMATE PERSONAL PLANS OUTLINED REF B AND WE WILLING HE TDY AT HQS AT END OF TWO WEEK VACATION WITH WIFE IN NEW YORK AREA. THIS WAY NO BREAK PERSONAL PLANS. NO NEED COVER SUDDEN BREAK WITH FRIENDS AND NO NEED EXTRA EXPENSE LATER ROUND TRIP. WILL DETERMINE TICHBORN AVAILABILITY 15 16 17 JULY.\n\n2. DO NOT SEE HOW FAZZARE'S FUTURE PLANS WITH WOFIRM (ENTERTAINING VISITING SPANIARDS IN WOLADY AND PERIODIC VISITS LOCAL WOPLAY OFFICE) REQUIRE INVOLVED FAMILY DISCUSSIONS OR ARRANGEMENTS WITH EMPLOYER. POINT REMAINS FAZZARE NOW FORMALLY TERMINATING CONTRACT AND WE ANXIOUS END HIS DISAPPOINTINGLY SHORT TOUR WITH MINIMUM EXPENSE.\n\n/CONTINUED/\nSECRET 2118052 JUN 68 CITE MADRID 5263\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nQHLP\n\nREF: DIRECTOR 09712\n\n1. FAZZARE HAD ORIGINALLY EXPECTED BRING FAMILY MADRID, WITH TENTATIVE IDEA RENEWING CONTRACT AT END OF YEAR. DUE FAMILY COMPLICATIONS (BUSINESS AFFAIRS OF HIS AGED FATHER-IN-LAW, HEALTH HIS AGED MOTHER AND AUNT), HOWEVER, HIS WIFE FOUND IT IMPOSSIBLE LEAVE HOME CITY. HE HAS THEREFORE NOT SEEN WIFE FOR A YEAR, FOR REASONS OF WOFIRM CONVENIENCE AND NOT HIS OWN. HE HAS PROMISED WIFE THEY WILL HAVE UNBROKEN TWO WEEKS VACATION NEW YORK FROM MOMENT HIS PLANE LANDS. SHE HAS THEREFORE MADE ENGAGEMENTS FOR BOTH WITH FAMILY FRIENDS IN NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT AND EXPECTS FAZZARE RETURN HOME WITH HER THEREAFTER.\n\n2. MORE IMPORTANT, HIS COVER OFFERS NO PLAUSIBLE REASON HE COULD GIVE THE FRIENDS WITH WHOM HIS WIFE HAS MADE ENGAGEMENTS, IF HE SHOULD SUDDENLY BREAK FIRM PLANS AND GO TO WASHINGTON FOR THREE DAYS.\n\n3. FAZZARE CAN MAKE NO SOLID PLANS WITH WOFIRM UNTIL HE HAS TALKED SERIOUSLY WITH WIFE AND TWO SONS AND CONSULTED HIS\n\nSECRET\n\n201-253263\nPAGE 2 MADRID 5263 SECRET\n\nEMPLOYER IN HOME CITY. UNTIL HE HAS OPPORTUNITY HOLD THESE\nDISCUSSIONS HE WOULD THEREFORE BE UNABLE CONDUCT ANY MEANINGFUL\nOPERATIONAL DISCUSSIONS AT HOS. THEREFORE ISSUES RAISED OSMA-\n11812 COULD NOT BE RESOLVED UNTIL FAZZARE DISCUSSES FUTURE WITH\nFAMILY AND EMPLOYER.\n\n4. STATION CONSIDERS FAZZARE USE OF MUCH IMPORTANCE IN\nCOMING YEARS. TICHBORN WILL BE ABLE REPLACE HIM IN SOME AREAS\nAND PICK UP SOME OF HIS CONTACTS BUT FACT REMAINS FAZZARE HAS\nUNIQUE ACCESS CERTAIN TARGETS. STATION EXPECTS TICHBORN TO BECOME\nVALUABLE COMPLEMENT TO FAZZARE OPERATION AND OPEN GROUND FAZZARE\nCANNOT, BUT HE WILL NOT BE A SUBSTITUTE. THIS SHOULD BE BORN IN\nMIND WHEN TICHBORN AND FAZZARE MEET.\n\n5. ON REF PARA 3, STATION HAS NO COPY FAZZARE CONTRACT. IF\nTERMINATION STATEMENT NEEDED IN SOME OTHER FORM THAN OFFICIAL\nREPORT OF DECISION TO TERMINATE AS IN OSMA 23801 OF 30 APRIL 1968,\nPLEASE ADVISE AS TO FORM AND PHrasing.\n\n6. REQUEST APPROVAL TRAVEL AS IN REF PARA 1 BUT REPLACING\nTDY STOPOVER WASHINGTON WITH ROUND TRIP CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON ON\nTDY IN AUGUST.\n\nSECRET\n\nBT\n\nSECRET\n21 June 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBRINY - Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\n1. At the request of Chief, DO/COC, the WOFIRM medical staff arranged for TICHBORN to be examined by a specialist in back disorders to check the nature of TICHBORN's back problem. TICHBORN had earlier injured his back when a bench on which he was sitting in the laundry room of his apartment collapsed. Since his injury, TICHBORN has, of course, been under the care of a doctor in New York. A back brace and physical therapy exercises have led to considerable improvement. However, in view of plans for TICHBORN's PCS assignment to Spain, a check by an independent specialist was deemed advisable.\n\n2. TICHBORN's appointment was with Dr. Henry L. Feffer, 2520 L St. N.W., Washington, D.C. at 11:15 hours on 19 June 1968. TICHBORN used the alias of Enrique Cortez with a New York post-office address supplied by the Office of Security, to wit:\n\n   P. O. Box 432\n   Church Street Station\n   New York, N. Y. 10008\n\nHe paid the bill of $38.50 upon leaving. The receptionist asked the name of TICHBORN's doctor and where the report should be sent. TICHBORN gave a fictitious name and address of a doctor in New York and said that Dr. Feffer knew where to send the report. (The report will be sent to Dr. Borscherding of the WOFIRM Medical Staff who will call C/DO/COC.)\n\n3. At a luncheon meeting at Fort Myer after the examination, TICHBORN informed Chief, DO/COC and the undersigned that Dr. Feffer had been more positive than TICHBORN's doctor in New York that TICHBORN does not have a ruptured disc. Dr. Feffer recommended physical therapy.\nexercises varying somewhat from those prescribed by TICHBORN's New York doctor. TICHBORN said that his back pains him toward the end of the day. Dr. Feffer opined that this condition should be cleared up within three months.\n\n4. TICHBORN appeared to be in excellent spirits at the luncheon. He was very enthusiastic about movie deals as a substantial part of his cover arrangements. He obviously is at home in this field and believes it will give excellent access to operation targets in Spain. TICHBORN has contacts in the U. S. movie industry, one of whom is a friend interested in making a movie in Spain. TICHBORN plans to meet this friend and other contacts in Los Angeles the first week of July.\n\n5. At the request of EUR/IB/Spain, the undersigned asked TICHBORN to be available in Washington, D. C. during the period 8-10 July 1968 to meet the contract agent whom TICHBORN will be replacing in Spain. TICHBORN agreed to do so and also to stay loose later in July for conversation with the Deputy Chief of Station, Madrid.\n\n6. The undersigned informed TICHBORN that from the cover point of view, it would be desirable for TICHBORN, enroute to Spain, to view the operation of WURINY/E in Greece. While there, we would like TICHBORN to assess a Greek whom WURINY/E considers to have good operational potential.\n\n7. TICHBORN said that he has not received a reply from the IRS to his request for a copy of his 1966 income tax return (requested by C/DO/Pers). TICHBORN said that he is, therefore, writing another letter.\n\nGale W. Allen\nDO/C\n\nCC: TICHBORN file\nWURINY/Ops\nchrono\nSECRET\n\nMADRID\n\n19.23 12 JUL 68\n\nNEED ASAP FOR TICHDORN PROJECT ESTIMATE IMPORT DUTY INTO SPAIN FOR HIS POV WHICH 1968 FORD STATION WAGON.\n\nEND OF MESSAGE\n1 June 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, OD/3/OSD\n\nSUBJECT: Enrico Cortez (A)\n\n1. As discussed with Mr. Gilbert of your office on 14 June 1968, it is requested that this above named subject be added to:\n\nP. O. Box 432\nChurch Street Station\nNew York, New York 10003\n\n2. The individual involved is a covert asset of this Division who will possibly need the address to give to an un-cleared medical specialist in the D.C. area when subject undergoes treatment on 19 June 1968. Should he not have to provide the address, you will be advised to terminate further interest. If he has to give it, we will want daily service through August 1968 with any mail received forwarded to the undersigned.\n\nJames F. Wright\nChief, OD/Security\n\ncc: Mr. Gale Allen\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, EUR/IB/Spain\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBRINY - Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\n1. Forwarded herewith is the revised proposal from WUBRINY/1 to Edward G. TICHBORN (P) covering the latter's assignment to Spain. It differs from the original in that the journalistic feature is dropped in favor of strictly commercial endeavors. Added is the possibility of developing a movie deal for submission to investors.\n\n2. TICHBORN had two meetings with QUSALT/1, both of which went well from the cover point of view. The first meeting involved TICHBORN and QUSALT/1, while TICHBORN brought his wife for the second in which QUSALT/1 was wined and dined. TICHBORN said that QUSALT/1 is all in favor of TICHBORN's proposed assignment. However, in view of past WUSALINE/Iberia inactivity, QUSALT/1 has an attitude of \"I will believe it when I see it.\" QUSALT/1 was particularly intrigued with the possibility of a movie deal and said that Spain is by far the cheapest place to make movies.\n\n3. The one disquieting feature of the meetings with QUSALT/1 concerned TICHBORN's wife. She took the occasion to query QUSALT/1 on all aspects of living in Spain. All went well until the subject of health came up. QUSALT/1 commented that everyone should expect to get hepatitis and said that he had a severe case. This comment shook TICHBORN's wife whose best friend in Mexico caught hepatitis and whose children subsequently got it.\n\n4. The undersigned specifically asked TICHBORN if his wife's concern with hepatitis posed the possibility of a refusal to accompany him. TICHBORN said that he thought not, but that he was going to drop the matter for a week. The undersigned stressed to TICHBORN that the Agency views his assignment as very important as\nevidenced by the favorable terms offered him. We have done considerable staff work on his assignment and don't have another suitable candidate immediately available. Should TICHBORN not be able to go to Spain, it would be a severe blow. TICHBORN said that he appreciates our position and did not see any reason to worry. The undersigned said that we are preparing a contract for TICHBORN and would like to make it for at least three years. TICHBORN agreed, saying that he too prefers a long-term contract.\n\nGWA/ekw\n\nDistribution:\nOrig - Adse\n1 - C/DOCO, DC/DO, C/55\n1 - TICHBORN file\n1 - chrono\nSECRET\n\nDIRECTOR\n\nQUHELP\n\nREF: OSM# 11012\n\n1. BELIEVE TICHBORN IS LOGICAL CHOICE TO MEET AND\nDEVELOP SELECTED INDIVIDUALS NOW UNDER CULTIVATION BY\nFAZZARE. BOTH TICHBORN AND FAZZARE ARE INTERESTED IN\nPROBLEMS OF LATIN AMERICANS LIVING IN AMERICA. BOTH ALSO\nINTERESTED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE SPANISH LITERATURE.\n\n2. SUGGEST WE CONTRIVE MEETING THIS SUMMER OF\nFAZZARE AND TICHBORN IN NEW YORK OR CALIFORNIA FOR\nPURPOSE (A) EXCHANGING IDEAS RE OPERATIONAL POSSIBILITIES\nSPAIN AND (B) ARRANGING HOW TICHBORN CAN PICK UP\nSELECTED FAZZARE CONTACTS WITHOUT IMPEDING FAZZARE'S\nFUTURE USEFULNESS TO WOFIRM IN SPAIN.\n\n3. ADVISE IF CAN BEGIN PLAN TOWARD SUCH MEETING.\n\nSECRET\n\nBY\n\nSECRET\n\n201-253203\nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND REVIEW\n\nTO: E/EB, Richard Long\nFROM: CHIEF, CI/CA, Edward P. Brum\nSUBJECT: LOPEZ, Henry P.\n\nIN ORDER THAT FURTHER CONSIDERATION MAY BE GIVEN YOUR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL IN THIS CASE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW, OR REVIEW INFORMATION AS INDICATED.\n\n- Review of Staff/Office\n- Review of Staff/Collateral Information\n- Review of Security Off. Report at E/EB\n- Review of SEC. OFF. CONCURRENCE MEMO AT E/EB\n- Review of FBI Report at E/EB\n- Review of Attached References\n- Other (Specify)\n\nNOTES: [ ] Initial [ ] Signature [ ] Third and Final\n\nThis will acknowledge receipt of your memorandum (dated 3 June 1968) requesting amendment to Subject's OA.\n\nBefore the OA may be amended, all Field and Headquarters traces (including Green List) must be brought up to date.\n\nIt is also requested that you bring bio data up to date from 1968.\nMEMORANDUM FOR: CI/OA\nVIA: C/DO/CO\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (P), 201-253203\nAmendment of OA\n\n1. European Division, with the cooperation of Domestic Operations Division, plans to assign Edward G. TICHBORN to Madrid, Spain under deep cover on a PCS basis in late summer of 1968.\n\n2. Since October 1966, TICHBORN, DO Division, working as a local representative of the proprietary WUSALINE in Madrid, Spain, was able to provide access to priority targets in Spain which might be provided by the WUSALINE Spanish affiliate, WUSALINE/Iberia. The results of this trip indicated that such access did exist and could be exploited by the assignment of a qualified officer as the WUSALINE representative in WUSALINE/Iberia. This assignment was offered to TICHBORN in the summer of 1967 but he was unable to accept it for personal reasons at that time. TICHBORN is now available for the assignment and we hope to place him in Madrid by September 1968.\n\n3. TICHBORN's new assignment will involve the following operational duties:\n\n   a. To identify, cultivate, and acquire intelligence from those individuals and groups within Spain who now play, and can be expected to play in the post-Franco period, a significant role in determining Spanish domestic and foreign policy.\n\n   b. To spot and assess individuals within the above group for possible recruitment by other Station assets.\n4. It is not anticipated that TICHBORN himself will attempt recruitments nor that he will be required to break his cover. Contact with the Madrid Station will be maintained under secure conditions at all times.\n\n5. Upon his assignment to Spain, TICHBORN will fall under the operational and administrative control of Europe Division. DO Division will provide cover support. He will be supported under Project QUELOOM.\n\n6. It is requested that Subject's OA be amended to the above assignment.\n\nWilliam Sorrels\nAC/E/IB\n\nCoordinated:\n\nC/DO/CC\n\nDistribution:\nOrig. & 1 - Address:\n1 - C/DO/CC\n1 - 201-253203\n1 - E/IB-MemoChron\n| TO: | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|-----|------|--------------------|----------|\n| EUR/IB/S/Dick. Long | 22 May 1968 | | |\n| 4 B 2607 | | | |\n\n**FROM:** Gale Allen, DO/G 210-A Key Bldg.\n\n**EXTENSION NO.:** 3689\n\n**DATE:** 22 May 1968\nMEMORANDUM FOR: RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBRNY - Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\n1. The undersigned met with TICHBORN at 1630 hours on 19 May 1968 at the undersigned's room in the Shoreham Hotel, 33 West 53rd Street, New York City. TICHBORN was still suffering from an injured disc and either stood or lay down on the bed during the course of the meeting. He said that he had been fitted for a back harness which he would get the following day. If his back did not improve with the harness, going into traction would be necessary. TICHBORN said that his back injury occurred when a bench on which he was sitting in the laundry room of his apartment collapsed. He said that he is meeting with a representative of the insurance company with which his apartment owner is insured to seek compensation. He had previously asked for and was mailed a list of benefits under his Army hospitalization policy. TICHBORN can sit down, but when sitting, it is very painful for him to get up.\n\n2. Per agreement with Chief, EUR/I/Spain, the undersigned offered TICHBORN a fee of $25,000 out of which TICHBORN will have to pay his own housing and educational expenses. Inasmuch as the normal housing allowance for Spain is $3,680.00 a year and the educational allowance for two children $1,120.00 or higher, the offer to TICHBORN amounts to a $20,000 base salary. TICHBORN was informed that additional benefits outside his basic fee would include:\n\n   a. Round-trip transportation less than first-class for him and his family to Spain and return to New York,\n\n   b. Cost of shipping and storage of household effects,\n\n   c. Temporary lodging allowance of $9 per day per adult and children over 11 up to 90 days with an additional $5 per day per child if the lodging has no kitchen facilities (TICHBORN has two children, a boy age 13 and a girl age 11).\n\nSECRET\nd. Transportation allowance of $50 per month,\n\ne. Ongoing expenses\n\nTICHORN was satisfied with his basic fee, commenting that it was much better than Mexico. He then added that money does not mean as much to him as it did, because his agent feels that TICHORN's book will be a good seller and earn a lot of money. TICHORN opined that the temporary lodging and transportation allowances are low. The undersigned pointed out that these allowances are applicable to staff employees and that they have been found adequate.\n\n3. The undersigned noted that TICHORN, by virtue of his association with WUSALINE and WUSALIFY and his 1967 trip to Spain, is in an excellent cover position for this assignment. He has also had the opportunity to meet the Agency representative in Madrid with whom he will be dealing. The undersigned gave TICHORN a copy of WUBRINY/I's letter outlining TICHORN's cover assignment (unamended copy attached). The undersigned noted that the senior officer of the firm participating with WUSALINE in WUSALINE/iberia in late 1966 had suggested that a developer of new business be obtained. This overture was followed by TICHORN's exploratory trip in June 1967. Subsequently, a WUSALIFY company for which TICHORN is a legal consultant, followed up on TICHORN's trip by sending a geologist to assess several abandoned silver properties. In this way, the stage should be well set for TICHORN as outlined in the cover letter prepared by WUBRINY/I.\n\n4. At 1800 hours, WUBRINY/I and WUBRINY/II joined the meeting to discuss cover arrangements. The undersigned emphasized that the arrangement would not only have to be plausible, but, in due course, there would have to be commercial results. TICHORN was also emphatic on this point. He suggested that the cover letter also include the possibility of putting together a movie deal. TICHORN said that he is thoroughly at home in the movie field and finds it a good access to targets of operational interest. WUBRINY/I seized eagerly upon TICHORN's suggestion, stating that he had always wanted to finance a movie deal. WUBRINY/I said that he\nwould amend the cover letter to include this possibility. Both the undersigned and WURRINY/1 stressed the importance of TICHBORN's obtaining U. S. clients to represent in Spain. Some further training for TICHBORN was recommended by WURRINY/1, including visits to certain WUSALINE affiliates. The undersigned concurred, stating that a visit to WUSALINE's affiliate in Greece would be particularly useful because TICHBORN might also do an assessment there on a Greek associated with WUSALINE's affiliate.\n\n5. WURRINY/1 said that QUSALT/1 is coming to the U. S. the third or fourth week in May 1968. It was agreed that WURRINY/1 and TICHBORN would gear up to get QUSALT/1's endorsement of TICHBORN developing business for WUSALINE/iberia.\n\n6. Both TICHBORN and the undersigned informed WURRINY/1 that employment terms have been agreed upon and opined that these terms might be more liberal than WURRINY/1 would privately extend. The undersigned said that the Agency would embody TICHBORN's employment terms in a contract from which commercial terms could be drawn. The undersigned added that all of the funding of TICHBORN would not necessarily have to be accomplished through WURRINY/1.\n\n7. TICHBORN owes the Agency $199.99 on an old loan. TICHBORN promised faithfully to send the undersigned a check in this amount prior to 31 May 1968.\n\n8. The Covert Tax Unit desires a certified copy of TICHBORN's income tax-filing for 1966. TICHBORN said that he had been unable to locate one and had asked the IRS for a copy.\n\n9. TICHBORN's wife is concerned about schools in Spain. The undersigned gave TICHBORN information on schools in Spain as obtained from EUR/1/Spain and from a friend who spent three years in Spain.\n\n10. TICHBORN said that he would like to go alone to Spain in August so as to be able to make arrangements in advance for his family.\n11. An amended cover letter is awaited from WUBRNY/1 as well as QJSALT/1's response to TICHBORN's assignment.\n\nGale W. Allen\nDO/C\n\n1 - EUR/IB/S/Dick Long\n1 - C/DOCO\n1 - TICHBORN file\n1 - chrono\nMay 15, 1968\n\nHenry P. Lopez, Esq.\n5900 Arlington Avenue\nNew York, N.Y.\n\nDear Henry,\n\nI have carefully considered your most interesting idea of activating our relationship in Madrid.\n\nYour operations with us here have been entirely satisfactory from our standpoint; and indeed, the volume of client business that you have been able to develop exceeded our expectations. On the other hand you say that some of these clients will follow you to Spain, and it would appear that the market in Spain for consulting services is somewhat less competitive than is the case here, so the eventual prospects could be good.\n\nAs you may know, our operation in Athens, which has worked out extremely well (although it involved a lot of hard work and trouble) came about in just the same way: after a year or so in the office here George Economakis one day suggested that he might be able to start a similar operation in Athens, to which we eventually agreed; it has all grown from there, and has been a most satisfactory business.\n\nIn considering your idea, I have thought of two categories into which your work might be divided: things which can be done through the medium of ICAE, etc., which certainly needs filling up, and things which can be done separately from it. We take up each category in turn.\n\n1. **ICAE-related**\n\n   a. **Joint venture with BMIF, S.A.**\n\n      We have formed the joint venture with BMIF, S.A., which is based in Madrid, the understanding was that we would make a serious long-term effort to get business for them and for our clients.\n\n      To date we have not found it possible to carry out...\nthis prospecting owing to budgetary limitations and a lack of spare time. Also, the other ICAP offices abroad have been too busy with their own affairs to think too much about getting business for each other.\n\nAs you may know, part of the original idea was that George Train would carry out this representative function with the American business community, but in the event, he developed a close relation with a Spanish bank, and devoted most of his available time to their concerns.\n\nBANIF has become restive as a result, and in fact yesterday I received a letter from them which raises the issue of winding up the arrangement.\n\nThe first activity, therefore, which I feel you could most advantageously carry out on our behalf in Spain would be that of seeking new business for ICAP Iberia. After an initial familiarization with the work of the office, I would suggest that you might call on the U.S. firms operating in Madrid and offer the services of ICAP Iberia. You can get a list of such firms through the Department of Commerce. There is also an American Club in Madrid (of which George Train was a founder) whose members would certainly be appropriate for such prospecting.\n\nAfter you have prospected the American business community, you could go on to the European firms operating in Spain, in the same way.\n\nI doubt if ICAP Iberia has the time for such extensive prospecting, so your work here would be valuable to them, I would think.\n\nAnother related area in which your services could be of help would be in helping in client relationships with U.S. clients that have begun working with ICAP Iberia or BANIF or are on the point of doing so.\n\nTo the extent that your existing Latin American or U.S. clients would need your services in Spain, you would naturally want to have prime responsibility for their affairs yourself. You would want to determine which of their needs could best be served by ICAP Iberia, using BANIF S.A. and other possible sources of support, and which you should handle separately or through New York.\nAs you know, ICAP Corporation and BANIF own approximately equal shares of ICAP Iberia. ICAP Iberia, in turn, gives first refusal on all consulting work to BANIF, but receives what amounts to a 30% override on such work. In other words, our indirect interest in consulting work which we get for BANIF through ICAP Iberia is 15%, which comes off the top.\n\nWe would be pleased to allocate to you a share in our interest in any such work brought in through your efforts (and recognized for fee purposes by ICAP Iberia and BANIF) as follows: 7\u00bd% (i.e., half of our indirect interest) of all fees during the first year after the actual commencement of billings for each client; 5% during the second year; and 2\u00bd% of all subsequent business.\n\nAnother sector where you could work directly with ICAP Iberia is related to the foregoing, and is simply U.S. law. To the extent that you could provide an in-house U.S. legal capability for them, particularly with respect to U.S. corporate practice and tax matters, I am sure this would be helpful.\n\nFinally, correspondence is essential to international business. We do not hear from our Spanish friends as we do from George Economakis or Giovanni Manes. The result is that we do not know what is going on in Spain, and do not have them on our minds. I am sure that if you were there you would keep us informed of opportunities, and as a result we could do a more effective job for them. In addition, you could act as the point of liaison between ICAP Iberia and the other ICAP affiliates.\n\n(This would of course involve your knowing the strengths and weaknesses of the other ICAPs, so as a first order of business I would request that you spend two or three weeks in ICAP Dallas, ICAP Italia and on a general prospection in France, Germany, and Benelux.)\n\n2. Activities outside of ICAP Iberia.\n\nBy far the most important of these is generating a placement capability for investment opportunities developed by ICAP Iberia. I do not think we expected when we started ICAP Iberia that the most important figure in this company would be one who was not even on the management at that time, namely Tony Lykardopulo. The really profitable side of our business is, as you know, the entrepreneurial one, not the professional one.\nIt is fine to have good ideas and to carry out thorough feasibility studies, but if you do not have a client who will go into these plans, they will not do you much good. Until Tony came along, ICAP Hellas did four or five studies a year for their own account, which they did not consummate. Now they seem to be in about the same position we are, which is that before we proceed with the full study we have sold the deal, and the study is mostly by way of documentation and background. Most investors come in on our say-so on the telephone, not in response to any documents. Tony has this power, and the others in ICAP Hellas, for some reason, generally do not. If you personally could carefully study every aspect of deals that BANIF might work up, and then present them to individuals, which we might suggest, there is a fair chance that we can do a real job of merchandising, which we can never do on writeups.\n\nThe second capability you might be able to develop for us outside the ICAP Iberia channels is related to the foregoing, namely to generate securities business for this office, just as Tony Lykiardopulo does. Our Special Account has the best performance record of any readily available investment medium that a foreigner is likely to see, and it has been getting better as time has gone on. It makes an excellent illustration of our capabilities in the investment management line. You would not be required to actually place our services with individual investors whom you might meet, but if you could identify them, and determine their needs in a preliminary way, on one of my periodic trips I could discuss our operation with them, and in the course of time there is little doubt that we would develop a slowly growing clientele. In addition, Tony Lykiardopulo can come to Madrid from time to time and maintain contact. Alternatively, you might eventually discover a customer's man in a brokerage house who would like to join us in the rather more elegant world of investment counsel, and we could make an arrangement directly with him.\n\nYou have spoken from time to time of your desire to increase the proportionate amount of time which you spend on creative writing and your interest in collaborating on a book on the \"Establishment\" in Spain, which in fact I agree with you is a fascinating subject that I have never seen well written up. Certainly, there is no case I know of where a quite tightly-knit aristocracy (or oligarchy) really runs things the way it does there. Anyway, making contact with some of the figures in that group could certainly tie in nicely with the various activities mentioned above.\nFinally, of course, we have your existing clients and their various interests in Spain, to which you have referred. You would need to allocate your time between these various activities as at present, letting us know where we stood.\n\nAll in all, it adds up, in my opinion, to a workable package, with, I would say, perhaps even more upside potential than the arrangements under which we are operating in New York now.\n\nAfter consultation with our directors, therefore, I am happy to tell you that we are willing, in principle, to go ahead with this plan, and to negotiate a detailed understanding at your convenience.\n| TO: (Officer designation, rank number, and building) | DATE | OFFICE'S DETAILS | COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |\n|---------------------------------------------------|------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| 1. Chief 164 R 15/18                              |      |                  | DON:                                             |\n| 2. McIntosh                                      | 4 B 26/69 |                  | You know his performance in the survey trip to Spain. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | His main contribution was in the illustrative work. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | He was associated with several development projects in Venezuela. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | He also has served as an author and editor. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | Although his primary duties involved administrative efficiency in financial reporting, |\n|                                                  |      |                  | I have not had any problems. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | In fact, the auditor who recently checked his reporting found his report detailed and fully |\n|                                                  |      |                  | explained. He is a valuable asset to the agency and I hope we can get him for this work. |\n|                                                  |      |                  | We will let you know within two weeks or sooner. |\n\nSignature: [Signature]\nSECRET\n\n25 May 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DC\n\nVIA: Chief, DC/CO\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. Tischhorn (F)\n\n1. The undersigned on 23 May 1967 reviewed in H/Division Tischhorn's 201 File (4 folders) and related operational files. Particular attention was given in this review to Tischhorn's security.\n\n2. The files reflect that Tischhorn is very security conscious. There is no evidence that Tischhorn was ever suspected of being a KGB operative.\n\n3. Tischhorn practiced law in California and was active in state and national politics. He was recruited as a political advisor on a part-time basis in 1959 by the CIA Staff. In 1962, he was taken on full-time under contract by H/Division and assigned to Mexico City. His cover for this assignment was publishing and movie interests in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America. In Mexico City he published a magazine, Tischhorn aired his left-wing intellectualism. The CIA Staff review in 1965 stated that Tischhorn's cover story was completely accepted by his friends and associates. The KGB/OF of Tischhorn in 1965 revealed that he had informed only his wife of his association with KGB/OF.\n\n4. The files reflect that Tischhorn is very sensitive about security. He balked at working with a KGB/OF officer in Mexico City, because a friend told Tischhorn that the KGB/OF officer not only was KGB/OF but had openly admitted it in the street. A proposed trip to Bolivia was aborted because Tischhorn felt there was no suitable cover.\n\n5. Tischhorn has traveled extensively in Latin America on training and election assignments. These countries include Mexico, Brazil, and Chile. Tischhorn's Republic of Bolivia files, which Tischhorn used his legal, publishing, and movie cover. It is understood that he also maintained undetected, although this was not noted in the quick review of the files. He can, of course, be debriefed in detail at this point.\n6. The files show that Tichborn's magazine, Diplomat, was funded through Tichborn by various individuals through intermediary made by CCI. The AD/NI/6 investigated Tichborn on any Foundation funding. Tichborn could recall only one instance of Foundation funding, from 1963-1964 when Bankers Trust issued a loan to the Fairfield Foundation. There is also a reference in the files that one, Louis Morier, was informed that CICID also supported Diplomat.\n\n7. The files reflect very favorably on Tichborn's performance - the reports by the Mexican Embassy and one from CCI/Canto Domingo are most complimentary. On the negative side, administrative details were high.\n\n8. The undersigned has consulted with Chief, WH/CA that if DO will take over Tichborn's contract, WH will pay Tichborn's salary and expenses for the first quarter of FY 1958. Chief, WH/CA is awaiting DO's decision.\n\n9. The undersigned is very favorably impressed by Tichborn. By 1 October, it is believed that Tichborn will be sufficiently well-trained in commercial and investment banking practices to do legal-business consulting on a fee basis for MUSLIM. He should be able, depending on the number of operational requirements, to earn a part, if not all, of his salary. On this basis, it is recommended that DO assume administration of Tichborn effective 1 July 1958, with the understanding that WH Division will defray Tichborn's salary and expenses during the first quarter of FY 1958.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Date: 26 May 1957]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Date: 21 May 1957]\n\ncc: Barry/Support\nChief of Station, Madrid\n\nChief, Europe Division\n\nOperational/Edward G. TICHBORN\n\nReference: OSW-23330, 11 January 1968\n\nAction: Your comments are requested.\n\n1. We regret our delay in responding to Reference and proceeding correspondence on this case. We will attempt below to answer the questions posed and comment where pertinent, keyed to paragraph 2 of Reference.\n\na. MUSALINE Iberia can, in principle, be used as an information collection mechanism. The type of requirements to be levied via MUSALINE would have to be consistent with that organization's past and present dealings with MUSALINE Iberia, i.e., commercially logical and feasible. Operating on this assumption, we believe that both general and specific requests for information could be levied and could cover a wide range of economic and commercial topics. We solicit your ideas on such requirements.\n\nb. This subject was investigated with TICHBORN during a visit he made to Headquarters during the week of 20 January 1968. There seems to be little doubt that TICHBORN could obtain the necessary interviews, write an article, and have it published in a publication such as Life International. In considering this proposition, however, we wonder just what a trip would accomplish. We foresee that TICHBORN would obtain biographic and limited assessment data on certain high-level economic figures. He might also obtain some positive intelligence information by elicitation. But, given TICHBORN's background and talents, the most important gain, especially should a favorable article subsequently appear in print, would be in his establishment of viable personal contact with those persons interviewed. Therein lies the problem, that of transferring the relationship established by TICHBORN to someone else in the Station. We feel that you will agree that this is a difficult thing to do. In short, will the benefit to us from a short (possibly two/three weeks) foray by TICHBORN be worth the\n\nAttachments: USC\n1. TICHBORN notes\n2. Identities\n\nDistribution:\n3 - COS, Madrid w/att\n\n(continued)\nnecessary investment in time, money and effort. Included in the latter would be Chief/LICENS approval. Such approval always requires solid operational justification and such justification would be especially necessary in this case, due to the probable publication outlet involved, Life International. We are inclined to think that such a trip would not be worth it, unless, and this is a possibility discussed below in paragraph 2, TICHEBORN were to be assigned PCS to Spain for a period of a year or more.\n\nc. Also discussed with TICHEBORN during his recent visit was the subject of his contacts with Spaniards in his home city and of his use in assessing and developing visiting Spanish contacts of the Station who might be steered to him. In the former category, we determined that TICHEBORN has not yet been active in making new contacts but would be willing to do so, on a selected basis. The question here is, when would we wish him to meet and develop? (TICHEBORN's immediate reaction was to suggest he meet the Spanish ambassador to Washington.) Unless the Station has some specific candidates in mind, we believe the most profit to be had from this exercise initially, would be to give TICHEBORN the task of assembling a spotting report on Spaniards in his home city engaged in commercial activities to whom, presumably, TICHEBORN would be able to logically develop access. We feel that to give him a broad assignment of reporting on any and all Spaniards he meets would be self-defeating. Of the list of potential targets, those selected Spaniards visiting TICHEBORN's city who might be steered to him by the Station, we feel that cover considerations will have to be carefully handled in order to protect TICHEBORN's new solid cover. TICHEBORN currently is covered as a business consultant and attorney under Identity A. He is specifically identified with Identity B and, when required, as on his trip to Spain, with WUSALINE. We would be perfectly willing to consider using TICHEBORN in this way provided the targets were carefully selected and could be steered to TICHEBORN without endangering his cover.\n\nd. In answer to paragraph 2d of the Reference, we are forwarding under separate cover copies of the reports which TICHEBORN submitted to Headquarters after his return. We can find no indication that these were sent to you at the time, although that was our intention. In any event, they appear to constitute additional detail to verbal reports provided to the Station by TICHEBORN while he was there last year.\n\n3. As the Station notes, the question of a PCS assignment to Madrid for TICHEBORN was solved last year due to a variety of reasons, both personal and professional. Recent discussions with NOPLAY, however, indicate that such an assignment should not be ruled out. It is possible that TICHEBORN would be available for PCS assignment to Spain in '59, assuming that suitable cover arrangements can be worked out. In this regard, his assignment to Madrid as WUSALINE's man in WUSALINE Iberia might be a logical extension of his past and present activities. In view of the Station's comments in paragraph 3c of Reference, we would appreciate your thoughts on this and on any other cover possibilities which come to mind. Granted that such an assignment is presently no more than a long range possibility, it is nevertheless an attractive one, worth an exchange of views.\n\n3. Developments cited in paragraphs 3a and 3d of the Reference are welcome as both appear to constitute potential access of value. We will be most interested in your progress.\n\n4. The case of QUESAL/1 is, as ever, a thorny one. We will comment on it by separate dispatch.\n\n5. To sum up, Headquarters is also impressed with TICHEBORN's potential as indicated by his all-to-brief visit to Spain last year.\n\n(continued)\nJudging from his performance there it appears that he would be a valuable addition to the Station effort against the unilateral target, if he were to be assigned to Spain. His utility here, or on a brief TDY assignment from here is, we feel, far less and can only be taken advantage of by a realistic selection of any tasks we may ask him to perform. There is little doubt that he can meet Spaniards of interest, the problem lies in how to follow up at long range, of how to transfer a relationship established by TIGHORN to someone else who could take operational advantage of it. Otherwise, we will end up with a long list of names and little else. On this basic point, a summation of the specific items dealt with above, we would welcome an exchange of views with the Station.\n\nHOWARD G. DOBBS\nIdentity A: Train, Cabot & Associates, Inc.\n\nIdentity B: Silver Resources Corporation, a company organized by Train, Cabot & Associates.\n2 February 1968\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Land Development Project - Valencia, Venezuela\n\n1. Contract Agent Edward G. TICHBORN (P) under Project WUBRNY has a major role in subject project which is being developed by a consortium of private and Venezuelan businessmen who have retained TICHBORN's services. The two principal Venezuelans involved financially in this project are Luis Ramon Bigott and Pablo Henning. Through these individuals, either socially or on a professional basis, TICHBORN has access to:\n\n   a. Eugenio Mendoza - businessman\n\n   b. Pedro Tinoco - lawyer and advisor to IBEC and David Rockefeller.\n\n   c. Luis Ignacio Mendoza - lawyer\n\n   d. Jose Cordido Freytes - lawyer and partner of ex-foreign minister Arismendi.\n\n   e. Diego Cisneros - owner of largest television station; has Pepsi Cola franchise for Venezuela, Brazil and Central America; owns ice cream manufacturing plant; is largest distributor of U.S. films.\n\n   f. Irwin Klein - good friend of TICHBORN's who works for Cisneros; formerly worked for the American Broadcasting Company.\n\n   g. Jose Mayobre - Minister of Petroleum; formerly head of ECLA; close friend of Pablo Henning, and also known personally by TICHBORN.\nh. Fila Henning - wife of Pablo Henning; daughter of one of Venezuela's richest men whose name TICHBORN could not recall; studied at the Maryknoll College, Tarrytown, New York; was sympathetic to Perea Jimenez.\n\n2. TICHBORN has also met Mr. Harold Horan who is Executive Secretary of the American Chamber of Congress.\n\n3. It is anticipated that TICHBORN will be meeting the contacts noted above as well as additional contacts in the event the project continues to move ahead favorably. Should any of TICHBORN's contacts merit operational assessment and development, DO personnel concerned with Project WUBRNY would be glad to work with WH/3/Venezuela.\n\nGale Allen\nDO/CO\n\nDistribution:\n1 - For the Record\n1 - WH/3/Venezuela\n1 - WUBRNY file\n1 - DO/CO Chrono\n1 - WUBRNY file\n| FROM | TO | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------|----|------|--------------------|----------|\n| DO/CO/Gale Allen GJ-64 | C/DO/CO Rm. 502 - 1750 Bldg. | 1 February 1968 | Gale | Take it easy to LAF INT. This goes to INT. Gale took Band Area. Feb 24th 64 also filed R2 |\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief/E/IB/G\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBRINY - Possible Operational Support of Madrid Station Objectives by Edward G. TICHBORN (P)\n\nREFERENCE: OSMA 23, 350 Dated 11 January 1968\n\n1. Per Mr. Long's request, the undersigned on 30 January 1968 discussed with Edward G. TICHBORN (P) possible support of Madrid Station objectives as raised in ref. It was confirmed that:\n\n   a. WUSALINE/Iberia can be used as an information collection mechanism in cases where information requirements can be couched in plausible economic and commercial terms for contractual surveys.\n\n   b. TICHBORN can assess and develop selected Spanish contacts of Madrid Station who may be visiting New York and who desire introductions in US commercial circles.\n\n   c. TICHBORN can develop Spaniards in New York as may be of operational interest to the Madrid Station. TICHBORN has not made an effort to develop Spaniards in New York but is willing and able to do so for any designated as operational targets. If desired, TICHBORN thinks he can meet the Spanish Ambassador to the U.S. through a friend, Senator Jose Montoya of New Mexico.\n\n   d. TICHBORN feels that he could write an article concerning leading Spanish industrialists and bankers for publishing in a prominent publication, such as \"Life International.\" TICHBORN believes that he has excellent bonafides for such a task because he previously published in \"Life International\" a four-page spread on birth control in Latin America. This article was favorably reviewed. TICHBORN suggested a related article on the population explosion in Europe and its effect on business as a possible topic for interviewing leading Spanish businessmen. TICHBORN,\nas a result of journalistic collaboration with Katherine Anne Porter, is represented in New York by a top literary agent, Monica McCall. TICHBORN thinks that it would take him two to three weeks in Spain interviewing top Spanish industrialists and bankers. He would send letters in advance to these targets informing them of his proposed itinerary, the purpose of his trip, and enclosing copies of his previous articles with favorable reviewer comments. He could be essentially a free lance journalist or have a business purpose as well. In the latter connection, it is of interest that following TICHBORN's trip to Spain, WUBRINY/1 sent a geologist to WUSALINE/Iberia to look into acquisition of silver properties in Spain. This purely commercial development appears to be a direct result of TICHBORN's trip and thus enhances TICHBORN's commercial bonafides.\n\n2. It is understood that E/IB/S has a copy of TICHBORN's report for dispatch to the Madrid Station per ref.\n\n3. Personnel concerned with Project WUBRINY will be glad to work with E/IB/S in any follow-up to the possibilities noted above.\n\nS\n\nGale Allen\nDO/CO\n\nDistribution:\nOrig & 1 - Address:\n1 - C/DO/CO\n1 - C/DO & DC/DQ\n1 - WUBRINY file\n1 - Chrono\nReference: OSMA 22,778\n\n1. Madrid has awaited a report of TICHBORN's trip to Spain and some response to the various proposals made in Reference Dispatch. SHERIDAN carried back the message that TICHBORN would not be assigned PCS to Madrid as suggested he might be in DIR 32794. We have a high opinion of TICHBORN's talents, so this was a disappointment.\n\n2. Regarding the proposals we made about how TICHBORN might continue to be useful in his target \"Study on Dynamics of Spain As an Economic Entity\" (see DIR 13385), there are several that we would like Headquarters to review:\n\n   a. Can WUSALINE Iberia be used as an information collection mechanism?\n\n   b. Has further thought been given to TICHBORN's writing, an article (possibly for \"Life International\") on leading Spanish industrialists and bankers?\n\n   c. Can TICHBORN develop Spaniards in his home city for Madrid Station? Can the Station ask selected Spanish contacts, who will be travelling to TICHBORN's city, to look up TICHBORN as a means of assessing and developing them?\n\n   d. Is TICHBORN preparing a report or contemplating any follow-up action to Reference trip?\n\n3. Reference provides sufficient details to make all these questions clear. If Headquarters can give us a status report on the above questions and where we now stand with TICHBORN and WUSALINE, we can in turn make suggestions on how we believe TICHBORN's talents can be used in the future. As mentioned above, we have a high opinion of his ability and we hope we can benefit from it. In the meantime,\nthere are several developments relating to TICHBORN/WUSALINE, etc. that should be mentioned.\n\na. The Station is now in direct contact with IDEN G of Reference.\n\nb. If he can be cleared, Station plans to attempt to recruit QUSALT/1.\n\nc. The Station is no longer considering WUSALINE Iberia as a possible cover mechanism.\n\nd. The Station (through HARRIOTT and NOGGLE) has met IDEN B. of Reference.\n\n4. We would appreciate Headquarters help in putting some momentum back into the Mission TICHBORN embarked on and on which he made a good start.\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Signature]\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Project WUBYZAS Status Report\n\nREFERENCE: Memorandum for Record, dated 23 January 1968, Same Subject\n\n1. Ref. noted that John A. BLENKINSOP (P) had suggested certain changes in his proposed contract and that these suggested changes had been referred to the OGC for comment.\n\n2. Attached are the OGC comments on BLENKINSOP's suggested changes. In brief, the OGC stood firm on the proposed contract as written and rejected BLENKINSOP's suggested changes. One change suggested by BLENKINSOP, i.e. to allow interim hotel expenses greater than $1000.00 in Istanbul, if necessary, was considered administrative by the OGC and left to DO for decision. In view of the rejection of BLENKINSOP's other suggested changes, it was decided to accept BLENKINSOP's request for interim hotel expenses to exceed $1000.00 if necessary. BLENKINSOP's suggested change reads \"Barring extraordinary circumstances, these expenses are not to exceed the amount of $1000.00.\" In his justification for this change, BLENKINSOP notes that time in transit for furniture could extend to six weeks and that in this case hotel expenses could be closer to $2000.00.\n\n3. WUBRINY 11 was advised on 24 January 1968 of our position on the contract. He will relay it to WUBRINY 1 and/or BLENKINSOP. BLENKINSOP's reaction is awaited.\n\nGale Allen\nDO/CO\n\nDistribution:\n1 - For the Record\n1 - WUBYZAS File\n1 - DO/CO Chrono\n| TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Number each comment by whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |\n|---------------------------------------------------|------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| C/DO/CO (Mr. Davis)                               |      |                    |                                                                                  |\n| Chief, DO                                         |      |                    |                                                                                  |\n| Mr. Allen                                         |      |                    |                                                                                  |\n| 2/14/68                                           |      |                    |                                                                                  |\n\nForm 610 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS \u25a1 SECRET \u25a1 CONFIDENTIAL \u25a1 INTERNAL USE ONLY \u25a1 UNCLASSIFIED\nMEMORANDUM FOR: RECORD\n\nSUBJECT: Agreement with WUBRINY/1 to Defray a Portion of Edward G. TICHBORN's (P) $17,000 Annual Contract Fee.\n\n1. Chief, DOCO, DC/DCO, Mr. Ed Welch, and the undersigned met on 3 January 1968 with WUBRINY/1 and WUBRINY/11. WUBRINY/1 had previously agreed in principle to buying a portion of TICHBORN's time. He was asked at the 3 January meeting to make a specific proposal on this matter. It was pointed out to WUBRINY/1 that the Agency does not have at this time any operational requirements for TICHBORN and that, ideally, TICHBORN's $17,000 annual contract fee would be offset completely by commercial fee income.\n\n2. WUBRINY/1 said that he is forming a development company in Venezuela for a land development project in which TICHBORN could be very useful the next six months. He proposed that the development company retain TICHBORN for six months at $5,000. If the project is continued, TICHBORN will be retained for a higher figure for the next six months plus a bonus if the project is successful. The company will, of course, also defray TICHBORN's expenses incurred on the land development project. For the Agency and Project WUBRINY, the agreement with WUBRINY/1 means that WUSALINE will expend $3,500 to retain TICHBORN for the next six months.\n\n3. The Venezuelan Desk was advised that TICHBORN will be going to Venezuela on 10 January 1968 and will be spending considerable time there during the next six months. The Venezuelan Desk was very receptive to exploiting TICHBORN operationally and prepared a detailed cable for COS/Caracas. However, this proposed cable was modified by WH Division upper.\nechelons to a notification that TICHBORN will be in Venezuela. As of 9 January, there had been no response by COS/Caracas.\n\nGale N. Allen\nDOCO\n\nGWA/ekw\n\nOrig- Mr. Davis (C/DOCO)\nC/DO\n1 - WUBRNY/Ops\n1 - DOCO chrono\n1 - TICHBORN 401\n| TO (Office designation, room number, and building) | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) |\n|--------------------------------------------------|------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 2.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 3.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 4.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 5.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 6.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 7.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 8.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 9.                                               |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 10.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 11.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 12.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 13.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 14.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n| 15.                                              |      |                    |                                                                                                 |\n\n**CONTAINS:**\n\n- Travel Vouchers\n- Performance Reports\n- Earning Statements\n- Medical Records\n- Contract Copies\n- Credit Cards\n\n**CALL IP/FILES EXT. 6867 FOR ATTACHMENTS, RECORDS CENTER JOB NO. 22/15 BOX NO. 5**\n\n**201-253203**\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DO/CN\n\nATTENTION: Mr. Donald G. Lemieux\n\nSUBJECT: Funding of Project WUBRINY through Project WUTACTIC/WUGLITTER\n\n1. As you know, WUTACTIC/WUGLITTER currently holds $17,338.58 of Project WUBRINY funds consisting of:\n   a. $3,000.00 from NE Division to reimburse WUSALINE for support of Staff Agent Martin J. UNGRICH (P),\n   b. $1,659.51 from Project WUTANDY to reimburse WUSALINE for an operational survey in Spain,\n   c. $5,000.00 from WH Division to reimburse WUSALINE for support of Contract Agent Edward G. TICHBORN (P),\n   d. $7,679.07 remaining of Project WUBRINY/P funds\n\n2. Transmitted under separate cover is a billing from WUSALINE to WUTACTIC/WUGLITTER in the amount of $17,265.50. Please arrange for a check to be drawn in the favor of WUSALINE in this amount and sent to WUSALINE Attention: the author of the billing.\n\n3. Would appreciate completing this transaction prior to 31 December 1987. If the check route is not feasible, a bank transfer would be all right. Necessary data for a bank transfer can be supplied, if needed, by telephone. By my calculations, the remainder of Project WUBRINY funds in WUTACTIC/WUGLITTER after this funding will be $73.08.\n\nGale W. Allen\nDOCO\n\nOrig & 1 - DO/CN\n1 - Tichborn 201\n1 - UNGRICH file\n1 - DO/CO chrono\n1 - ICAP/Iberia\n1 - F/Support\n\nDec 23 1987\nDecember 20, 1967.\n\nSr. Ismael Aguila\nPresident\nDiamond de Panama\nS.A.\nApartado 4297\nPanama City, Panama\n\nDear Ismael:\n\nPlease forgive me for not having submitted my accounting sooner than this. As you know, I have been away from New York on several trips and my correspondence has accordingly fallen behind. Should there be any question concerning the data which you will find on the attached sheet, please let me know, and I shall be happy to submit any clarification you desire.\n\nAt the moment I am devoting all my time to the Sattelite City project in Venezuela, and have consequently let matters ride with respect to the Mexican border development program.\n\nPlease let me know when you are coming to New York, for I would like to take you to that wonderful Latino restaurant you mentioned in our recent phone conversation.\n\nUn abrazo carinoso\n\nHenry P. Lopez.\n**EXPENSE REPORT**\n\n| Date   | Description                                                                 | Amount  |\n|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|\n| Oct. 3 | American Management Assoc. Conference on business problems of Spain          | $175.00 |\n| Oct. 4 | Mayflower Hotel Discussions regarding border development                     | 36.58   |\n| Oct. 4 | American Express Spanish trip regarding silver mines                         | 574.30  |\n| Oct. 13| Reimburse Lopez Extra expenses regarding border dev.                          | 88.32   |\n| Oct. 16| Advance to Lopez Expenses Mexico-San Antonio-Los Angeles regarding border development | 250.00  |\n| Oct. 30| Charged to TCA Expenditures re ICAP general                                   | 39.40   |\n| Nov. 14| Diners Club Entertainment Mex Consul ICAP general                             | 18.10   |\n| Nov. 14| American Express Entertain various officials re border dev.                   | 62.58   |\n| Nov. 14| Vision Travel Inc. 1/2 of plane fare for Mexico-L.A. trip                     | 201.22  |\n\n**Total Expenses** $1,465.50  \n**Total Consulting Fees** $15,000.00  \n**Total Due** $17,265.50\n| FROM | EXTENSION NO. | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|------|---------------|------|---------------------|----------|\n| C/MI/Contracts/WSRenehan 3D 5321 | 4460 | 16 November 1967 | | |\n| 1. | | | | |\n| 2. | | | | |\n| 3. | | | | |\n| 4. | | | | |\n| 5. | | | | |\n| 6. | | | | |\n| 7. | | | | |\n| 8. | | | | |\n| 9. | | | | |\n| 10. | | | | |\n| 11. | | | | |\n| 12. | | | | |\n| 13. | | | | |\n| 14. | | | | |\n| 15. | | | | |\n\n**TO:** (Office designation, room number, and building)\n\n- C/DO/SS 1715 BLDG\n- C/DO/Pers 17 51 BLDG\n\n**RECEIVED**\n\n- 1\n- 2\n- 3\n- 4\n- 5\n- 6\n\n**FORWARDED**\n\n- 1\n- 2\n- 3\n- 4\n- 5\n- 6\n\n**COMMENTS**\n\n- File Tebben\n- File Tebben\n- File Tebben\n\n**Date:** 16 November 1967\nMemorandum  SECRET\n\nTO: C/DO/Pers\n\nFROM: C/WH/Contracts\n\nDATE: 16 November 1967\n\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN, Insurance Premiums\n\n1. It is requested your office effect necessary arrangements for Edward G. TICHBORN to forward future insurance premiums directly to a DO component for related processing.\n\n2. Heretofore TICHBORN has been sending his check for premiums to:\n\n   Mr. William Rodgers\n   P.O. Box 10146\n   Woodridge Station\n   Washington, D.C. 20018\n\n3. It was noted that on his last check, TICHBORN had of course signed the check in true name but had also inserted \"TICHBORN Medical Insurance\". It would appear to be advisable to brief TICHBORN on the use of a pseudonym.\n\n[Signature]\n\nMr. Renahan\n\nSECRET\n\nBuy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan\n| TO: | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|-----|------|---------------------|----------|\n| WH/B&F 3D5325 | 9/27 | 7/29 | (Handwritten notes) |\n| C/WH/SS | 29/Sept | CL | (Handwritten notes) |\n| C/DODS (Allen) | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n| | | | (Handwritten notes) |\n29 September 1967\n\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DODS\nATTENTION: Mr. Gale Allen\nFROM: Chief, WH Division\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (P) - Settlement of Outstanding Account\nREFERENCE: Memorandum from C/WH, dated 29 August 1967 - Same subject\n\n1. During a meeting on 13 September 1967, C/WH/B&F advised subject that monthly payments of $125.00 had been received through May 1967 and that funds due him from TDY travel in the amount of $175.01 were applied as his June payment.\n\n2. TICHBORN stated he thought he had mailed a check for $125.00 and he would check his records when he returned to New York. As of this date no check has been received.\n\n3. It is requested that TICHBORN be contacted and advised that the loan payment he promised has not been received; and that he should forward his check in the amount of $375.00 which will currently pay his loan through 30 September 1967.\n\n4. Please advise WH/B&F accordingly.\n\nWilliam V. Broe\nChief\nWestern Hemisphere Division\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DO/Personnel\n\nSUBJECT: Renewal and Amendment of the Contract for Edward G. Tichborn (P)\n\n1. It is requested that the contract for contract agent Edward G. Tichborn (P) be extended for another year from 1 October 1967 through 30 September 1968.\n\n2. It is further requested that Tichborn's contract be amended to permit profit sharing along lines as follows:\n\n\"It is anticipated that in the conduct of your cover duties, you will represent various clients on a fee basis. In the event such fees, less all approved allocable expenses, exceed your basic compensation of $17,000, the excess over $17,000 will be split 50-50 between you and your cover company, except that your total compensation shall not exceed the highest salary for a GS-15 as may prevail during the period of your contract.\"\n\nGale W. Allen\nDOCO\n\nCA: 0 & 1 - DO/Perma\n1 - Tichborn file\n1 - DOCO chemo\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, WH/BAF\n\nSUBJECT: Reimbursement of Proprietary Project VUSALINE for Salary and Expenses of Edward G. TICHORN (P) (201-253203)\n\n1. A DO proprietary company (VUSALINE) under Project VUSALINE provided cover and funding for contract agent Edward G. TICHORN (P) (WH Project UOACE) during the period 1 October 1966-30 June 1967. It was agreed between WH and DO Divisions that DO would assume operational responsibility for TICHORN on 1 July 1967, but that WH Division would continue to bear TICHORN's salary for the first quarter of FY 1968. It was also agreed that WH Division would reimburse DO Division for operational expenses funded by VUSALINE during the period 1 October 1966-30 June 1967. These expenses amount to $2,750.99. WH Division previously transferred $14,750 to DO Division for salary and expenses of TICHORN.\n\n2. It is requested that WH Division reimburse DO Division additionally in the amount of $4,585.99 covering the $2,250.00 balance of TICHORN's salary ($17,000-14,750) and the $2,335.99 expenses incurred prior to 30 June 1967. Payment instructions are attached.\n\n[Signature]\n\nV. E. MONTGOMERY\nChief, DO Support Group\n\nDOCO/Gale Allen/ekw (11 Sep 67)\n\nDistribution:\n1 - DO/BAF\n1 - 201-253203\n1 - DOCO chrono.\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nTO: Office of Finance\n\nFROM: DO/CH\n\nDATE: 11 September 1967\n\nSUBJECT: Request for Covert Payment (Other Than Cash and Treasury Check)\n\nIt is requested that payment authorized on attached documents reflecting obligation reference number (or other divisional ref. No.) be made in the following manner:\n\n1. Payment to: See Below\n\n   | Name or Payee (From) | Amount |\n   |----------------------|--------|\n   |                      | $4,988.98 |\n\n2. Method of Payment\n\n   a. By check:\n      (1) Devised Cover Check. Account No.\n      (2) Bank Cashier's Check (specify city by checking below)\n\n      | City       | Account No. |\n      |------------|-------------|\n      | Atlanta    |             |\n      | Boston     |             |\n      | Chicago    |             |\n      | Cleveland  |             |\n      | Dallas     |             |\n      | Denver     |             |\n      | Los Angeles|             |\n      | Minneapolis|             |\n      | Miami      |             |\n      | New York   |             |\n      | Philadelphia|            |\n      | Richmond   |             |\n      | San Francisco|           |\n      | Washington |             |\n\n   *Checks in any amount up to $25,000.00 from New York; $10,000.00 from Dallas; $2,500.00 from Washington are available for immediate delivery.\n\n   b. By deposit, bank transfer, etc. to Payee's Bank Account:\n      Banking instructions to effect deposit (for use by Requesting Officer or Compensation and Tax Division)\n      Complete the following:\n      (1) Account Name: Diamond Do Panes, S. A.\n      (2) Account Number: 123-456-789\n      (3) Bank Name: Chemical Bank New York Trust Company\n      (4) Bank Address: 345 Third Avenue\n      (5) Transfer: \u2610 via Mail \u2610 Bank Wire or \u2610 Cable\n      (6) Payment to be originated from Dallas\n\n   c. If payment is to be originated by Foreign Bank, specify country and complete section b.(1) through (7) above. Discuss details with Monetary Division, Field Operations Branch, ext. 3523.\n\n3. Payment by other means: Contact Monetary Division Banking Branch Officer, ext. 3493.\n\n4. Check will be picked up at \u2610 6E29 Bldgs. or \u2610 (Specify)\n\n5. When transaction is complete notify Donald G. Lennex, ext. 11-61172\n\nDonald G. Lennex, DO/CH\n\nFREDERICK C. HINES, C/O/CH 11-61172\n\nFOR USE BY OFFICE OF FINANCE ONLY\n\n| Method of Payment | Account No. | Code | Bank |\n|-------------------|-------------|------|------|\n|                   |             |      |      |\n\nCHECK ON: BANK\nPAYABLE TO: BANK\n\nACTION BY BANK\n\nCHECK DEPOSIT MAIL BANK CABLE TELEPHONE\n\nSECRET\nSECRET\n\nTo: Office of Finance\n\nDate: 11 September 1957\n\nSUBJECT: Request for Covert Payment (Other Than Cash and Treasury Check)\n\nIt is requested that payment authorized on attached documents reflecting obligation reference number (or other divisional ref. No.) be made in the following manner:\n\n1. Payment to: [Name]\n\n   [Amount]\n\n2. Method of Payment\n\n   a. By check:\n      (1) [Name]\n      (2) [Name]\n\n   b. By deposit, bank transfer, etc. to Payee's Bank Account:\n      Banking instructions to effect deposit (for use by Requesting Officer or Compensation and Tax Division)\n      Complete the following:\n      (1) Account Name: [Name]\n      (2) Account Number: [Number]\n      (3) Bank Name: [Name]\n      (4) Bank Address: [Address]\n      (5) Transfer: [Method]\n      (6) Payment to be originated from [Name]\n\n   c. If payment is to be originated by Foreign Bank, specify country and complete section b.(1) through (6) above. Discuss details with Monetary Division, Field Operations Branch, ext. 555.\n\n3. Payment by other means: Contact Monetary Division Banking Branch Officer, ext. 555.\n\n4. Check will be picked up at [Location] or [Location]\n\n5. When transaction is complete notify [Name]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\n\n[Date]\n\n[Office of Finance]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Name]\n\n[Date]\n\n[Office of Finance]\n| TO | OFFICER DESIGNATION | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS |\n|----|---------------------|------|---------------------|----------|\n| 1. | C/WH/B&P            | 29/67|                     |          |\n| 2. |                     |      |                     |          |\n| 3. | C/WH/SS             | 29/67|                     |          |\n| 4. |                     |      |                     |          |\n| 5. |                     |      |                     |          |\n| 6. | C/DODS              | 3/08/67|                  |          |\n|    | ATT: GAIL ALLEN     |      |                     |          |\n\nArranged meeting between Teddern and WH 18+E officers on 13 Sept.\n\nFile Teddern 201.\nMEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DODS\nATTENTION: Gale Allen\nFROM: Chief, WH Division\nSUBJECT: Edward G. TICHBORN (F) - Settlement of Outstanding Accounts\n\n1. The finance records of WH Division Budget and Fiscal Branch reflect an outstanding unaccounted for balance of funds amounting to $3,613.38. This amount represents unaccounted for funds utilized by TICHBORN while on assignment in Mexico City with the LIREAM project. TICHBORN has been advised previously as to the nature of what these unaccounted for funds represent and was to contact WH Division when he was in the Headquarters area for further discussion and settlement.\n\n2. In addition, TICHBORN received a loan from the Agency which he is required to repay at the rate of $125.00 per month. He is presently two months in arrears in payments, of which his current loan balance is $1,074.99.\n\n3. It is requested that your office advise TICHBORN regarding the settlement of the unaccounted for funds of $3,613.38, and also that the amount of $250.00 is due on his loan.\n\n4. Please advise WH/B&F accordingly.\n\n[Signature]\nJacob D. Esterline\nActing Chief\nWestern Hemisphere Division\nThe function balances around 0.5, which is a very creditable result. The function is not linear, which may be due to incomplete data. The function is in Reference A, but it has been extrapolated. The function is in Reference B, and the values are about a factor of two. The function is in Reference C, and it might be expected to have a similar shape. The function is in Reference D, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference E, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference F, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference G, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference H, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference I, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference J, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference K, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference L, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference M, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference N, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference O, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference P, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference Q, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference R, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference S, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference T, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference U, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference V, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference W, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference X, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference Y, and it is more complex. The function is in Reference Z, and it is more complex.\nCONFIDENTIAL\nList with the names and positions of the people involved in the project:\n\n1. Ted Richmond, Producer of \"The Paper\" Film\n2. Enrique de Villota, President of IMMO Films\n3. Florentino M. M. M., President of IMMO Films\n4. Joaquin de la Rosa, member of the Roca family (ship-building) in Mallorca\n5. Donald B. L. L., President of International Commodities Company\n6. M. J. C. C., American Legation\n\nConfidential\n1. Acquaintances:\n\n2. Emilia Acosta (mother of Acosta family, which owns large drug and a textile company)\n\n3. Emilio Acosta, one of Acosta family which owns large textile and construction company (owned by CIA) and a client of Rob ROY's\n\n4. Young member of Acosta (Brandy) family whose name was not supplied\n\n5. Emilio Acosta, independent movie producer\n\n6. Maria Acosta de Robles, a young sculptress who is reportedly a close friend of Emilio Acosta de Robles\n\n7. Alvaro Acosta-Castillo (MNR) already know him\n\n8. Susana Acosta, movie star, accompanied by young playboy type whose name escapes me.\n\nMany others...\n1. [Nombre 1], [Cargo 1]\n2. [Nombre 2], [Cargo 2]\n3. [Nombre 3], [Cargo 3]\n4. [Nombre 4], [Cargo 4]\n5. [Nombre 5], [Cargo 5]\n6. [Nombre 6], [Cargo 6]\n7. [Nombre 7], [Cargo 7]\n8. [Nombre 8], [Cargo 8]\n9. [Nombre 9], [Cargo 9]\n10. [Nombre 10], [Cargo 10]\n11. [Nombre 11], [Cargo 11]\n12. [Nombre 12], [Cargo 12]\n13. [Nombre 13], [Cargo 13]\n14. [Nombre 14], [Cargo 14]\n15. [Nombre 15], [Cargo 15]\n16. [Nombre 16], [Cargo 16]\n17. [Nombre 17], [Cargo 17]\n18. [Nombre 18], [Cargo 18]\n19. [Nombre 19], [Cargo 19]\n20. [Nombre 20], [Cargo 20]\n\n[Signature]\n[Name]\nCONFIDENCIAL\n\n1. Manuel Jos\u00e9 S\u00e1nchez, Presidente Interino, C.A.\n2. Juan Jos\u00e9 Cervera\n3. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda S\u00e1nchez, Marqu\u00e9s de Casa C\u00f3rdoba\n4. Jos\u00e9 Cervera P\u00e9rez, Uni\u00f3n Electr\u00f3nica\n5. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Villas Tobarra, B.A. Cruz\n6. Joaqu\u00edn \u00c1lvarez Rodr\u00edguez, Banco Central\n7. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Urrutia y Larrinaga\n8. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Arceo y Villarreal, Marqu\u00e9s de Castilla\n9. V\u00edctor de S\u00e1enz de Madina, Marqu\u00e9s de Tr\u00edano\n10. Eugenio Callejo, Ministro de Hacienda, S.N.C.\n11. Ignacio Echevarr\u00eda, Marqu\u00e9s de Abajo\n12. Ignacio Villalobos Villalba, Banco Central\n13. P\u00edo de \u00c1lvarez G\u00f3mez, Ministro, S.N.C.\n14. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Landa y de las Fuentes, B.E.P.\n15. Felipe de Guzm\u00e1n y Vargas, Marqu\u00e9s de Fontalba\n16. Benito Jos\u00e9 de Terreros y Aranda\n17. Juan Antonio de Arana y \u00c1lvarez, P.I.M.E.C.\n18. Juan de la Cueva\n19. Pedro P. de Guadarrama G\u00f3mez\n20. Luis Est\u00e9vez y G\u00f3mez, Ministro de Hacienda\n21. Ram\u00f3n Fern\u00e1ndez Ariza, Ministro\n22. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Villalobos, Marqu\u00e9s de Castilla\n23. Carlos Gonz\u00e1lez G\u00f3mez, S.N.C.\n24. Eduardo S\u00e1nchez\n25. Carlos M. de la R\u00faa, C\u00e9sar de la R\u00faa\n\nCONFIDENCIAL\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\n1. Luisa E. Smith\n2. Robert Smith\n3. Juan Gonz\u00e1lez y Silva, contador\n4. Alejandro de Luna y Puga\n5. M. Ram\u00edrez, ingeniero\n6. Agust\u00edn del Guadalupe, abogado\n7. Alfredo Gonz\u00e1lez Reyes\n8. Mar\u00eda Garc\u00eda, se\u00f1ora Forbush\n9. Frank Brown, ingeniero\n10. L\u00f3pez-L\u00f3pez y Mart\u00ednez, abogado\n11. Marqu\u00e9s de Vereda, de la Cinta, campesino\n12. Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Arredondo y Mart\u00ednez de Rosas, conde de Hertiga\n13. Carlos de Miranda Cruz, conde de Casa Hertiga\n14. Antonio Gonz\u00e1lez Valdez\nI. Can ICAP-DANEP serve our operational needs?\n\na) Present status:\n\nAs we all undoubtedly realize, our relations with ICAP have been rather loose and underdeveloped due largely to budgetary limitations. We have, in effect, a nice-sounding relationship called \"ICAP IBERIA S.A.\" - with a rather impressive board of directors - but we have generated almost no business to date. As Miguel Echegaray so wryly observed: \"After all, Hank, we've had less than $200 income for ICAP IBERIA, and that wouldn't even pay one day's overhead in this office.\" As a consequence of our limited business activity with their office, I doubt that ICAP figures very prominently in the over-all plans of the ICAP people. Nevertheless, they have explicitly stated that the ICAP-DANEP combination has considerable potential \"if you would in New York would invest a little more time and energy to certain Spanish problems.\" They apparently feel that we have access to American business firms who could actively engage in joint ventures with some of their Spanish clients - or that ICAP itself could invest therein.\nThe EMIF people also feel that we should be able to \"feed\" the clients for market surveys and feasibility studies. I've read two of their more impressive studies, and I'm inclined to believe that this particular suggestion has some merit. With this thought in mind, I suggested that Echegaray send me a copy of the study they did for Clin Matheson, so that we might duplicate on the Xerox and thereafter show it to prospective clients.\n\nThere should be a number of other ways in which we can strengthen our ties with EMIF - all of them requiring time, effort and money - and I strongly suggest that we do so because I am also fairly well convinced that EMIF EMIF (through its association with EMIF) can be developed into a viable channel to the target people. I discussed this at great length with our Latin representative in Madrid, and we have agreed: a) that there is a considerable operational need for close contact with the target businessmen, and b) that EMIF offers at least one channel to those people. (I'll discuss at least two other channels later on in this report.)\n\n2) EMIF EMIF (EMIF) EMIF EMIF\n\nMost of the officers of EMIF are also officers of ICAP ICAP S.A., but I should like to discuss their background and contacts as they relate to EMIF.\n1. **Echegaray**\n\nEchegaray is the number-three man at ENUSA and the person most directly involved with the bank. He is generally a very pleasant and intelligent person, but if we should ever consider recruiting him for the bank, I would recommend against such a move. Aside from certain personal traits (a tendency to be a plunger and general antipathy), Mike is often excessively outspoken and indiscreet. In a strongly-Catholic country he frequently blasts the Church without bothering to ascertain the religious inclinations of the person he's addressing \u2014 and his political views are bristled about with equal abandon. Furthermore, I have a feeling that Echegaray wants to get out of Spain and perhaps out of the investment business. Perhaps he's one of those perpetually-discontented human beings who are always bitching about their jobs or resident countries but never make the move \u2014 which suits me.\n\n2. **Alonso-Castillo**\n\nAlthough frankly skeptical about hiring Echegaray for the bank, I am intrigued with the notion of recruiting his colleague Alonso-Castillo. As a permanent legal adviser to the Spanish Government at cabinet level (Ministro del Gabinete de Estado), he is obviously\nvirgin to the fourth to be interested in. Moreover, he seems to have a penchant for a bit of intrigue. Some time ago he acted as a \"spy man\" for George Brown, the Labor leader, who gave Alonso-Castrillo a large bundle of questions for certain Spaniards who were engaged in combating police influence in labor. And in recent years he has served as the \"Secretary\" of the shadow cabinet of Don Juan de Bourbon, attending periodic meetings in Lisbon even though he \"knows it's a lost cause.\" I rather suspect he would enjoy a little extra cash, but his principal reason for helping the bank would be the psychological satisfaction of being involved in something with an international flavor and political hanky-panky. In addition to his duties at BANEF, Alonso-Castrillo is a member of the board of directors of the following firms: Farmacia, S.A. (medical drugs), Fenib\u00e9rica, S.A. (antibiotics), Inmobiliaria Centro, S.A. (real estate), Artes Gr\u00e1ficas Agui (printing), Artes Gr\u00e1ficas Clavilena (printing).\n\nHe's a lawyer with a taste for scholarly pursuits as evidenced by his having worked for Master's Degrees in International Law at Harvard and at Paris University. Moreover, he's an associate professor of International Law at the University of Madrid and has published several books and articles.\nI was unfortunately unable to get much of a \"line\" on this gentleman. During my several visits to RUMIF he was heavily involved in negotiating what Echevarry characterized as \"a very big and complicated deal with some French and American financiers.\" In any event, we saw each other only briefly - but I got the impression that ICAP-SEBRA has not developed sufficiently to engage his interest.\n\nFor the record we might note that Ruiz de Alda is on the board of directors of the following firms: Algodonera de Castilla S.A. (cotton ginning), Energia e Industrias Aragonenses S.A. (power producer and chemical manufacturer), Hilaturas Alda S.A. (a family company engaged in cotton spinning).\n\nEchevarry informed me that Ruiz de Alda has close personal ties with Luis Ureta, managing director of Banco Hispano Americano; Alfonso Pueyo, president of Banco It\u00e1lico; and Felipe Carri\u00f3n Basadre, Conde del Cadagua, president of Banco Vizcaya.\nOne of Bob Rodney's chief associates is CASTILLO URBIA FIGUERIA, a member of a distinguished family headed by Luis Urbia y Gavil\u00e1n, Conde de Las Cottanas, the owner of Minero Sider\u00fargica de Fontarrabia. His company is listed as one of hundred largest enterprises in Spain.\n\nAs a preface to my remarks about Castilla, I should like to point out that I had previously met with George Train and Miguel Echegaray, and I had asked them to name some of the outstanding figures in banking, manufacturing, utilities, chemicals, construction, etc. Except for two or three of the better-known names, neither Train nor Echegaray seemed to have such information at the tip of the fingers, but they both took my previously-prepared check list of categories and volunteered to fill in the blanks during the next few days.\n\nThat same afternoon I dropped in at Bob Rodney's office and casually mentioned that I would like to identify Spain's top business leaders for a possible moonlighting-on-the-job article for FORTUNE magazine. \"Well, that's easy,\" said Bob, \"My two associates know all about them.\" He then introduced me to Castilla Urbia Figueria and Ciriaco de las Barceras, both about 25 years old and quite attractive in their miniskirts. Having glanced at my list, Bob said, \"Will you please tell Sarah Lopez the names of the leading bankers in Spain?\"\n\nWithout a second's hesitation, they named the ten leading banks.\nand then told me the same or directed that, also adding such\nsentries as \"Alfonso and Ignacio Pardo really have more say-so\nat the Banco Industrial than their brother Antonio,\" or \"Don Ignacio\nVillalobos is rather old now, so Luis Escobar will probably take\ncharge of the Banco Central pretty soon.\"\n\nThen I asked about manufacturing, construction, food\nprocessing, automobiles and aeroplanes, utilities, etc., they\nrecited off scores of names (plus intra-family marital connections)\nlike two chatty IBM machines, not once referring to the several\nnotes of index cards they had previously prepared for Rooney.\nAfter they had finished their amazing ad-lib performance, Bob\nand I checked the notes I had taken against the information listed\nin his \"file of Spain's 500 outstanding business and society\npeople,\" and they matched perfectly - not one error. I later\nchecked their data with the information published in LAS PRIMERAS\nINVERSIONES ESPA\u00d1OLAS, edited by the Sociedad Editorial de Econom\u00eda\ny Finanzas, and here again it proved correct in every respect.\nAt no time did Miguel Echegaray, Alfonso Castirillo, George Train,\nAnthony Cesaretti (or anyone else I met) demonstrate such an\nencyclopaedic knowledge of names and businesses related thereto.\n\nAside from the consideration of future marital prospects,\nI simply can't imagine what has motivated these girls in their\naccumulation of such data, but I was further flabbergasted by\nCasilda's 12th birthday during the next several days. Soon after\nour initial meeting I escorted Casilda to a party given by\nCasilda Casilda. (3)\n\nCasilda Casilda, having been invited to accompany the party Romayas. During the party she introduced me to twenty or thirty people, many of them friends of her family, and after each introduction she would give me a thumbnail sketch of the person we had just met: profession, family background, marital status, relatives, schooling, name-of-wifey, etc. On the following night she took me to a pre-dinner cocktail party at the home of Jaime Cisneros, whose family controls Kelvinator de Espa\u00f1a. There I met the Marqu\u00e9s de Casa Trespe\u00f1as, Graciela Abell\u00f3 (of the Abell\u00f3 drug production), Juan Huarte (head of Huarte y Cia. construction company), a playboy member of the Ezquerra family, Benito Sorojo (an independent movie producer), Haku Navarro de Zubillaga (young sculptress who is apparently a close friend of Princess Beatriz de Saboya), and an actress named Rosanna Yanni, who was accompanied by a young yeh-yeh playboy whose name was mumbled by Casilda. Incidentally, she speaks with a Madridese lisp that is often confusing to my Mexican ear.\n\nAt the urging of CD (and with my willing assent), I spent considerable time and money cultivating Casilda \u2014 dinner dance on Saturday, to the bullfights at Toledo with an American crowd, and a brief visit with Casilda and her off-and-on fianc\u00e9 in Paris, where he presumably studies at the Sorbonne. Casilda had planned to go to Paris for Casilda Day (the Spanish ambassador, Carlos de Miranda Guer, is a family friend), and she suggested\nthat I stop there en route to New York \"to meet by perhaps chance.\"\n\nI was assured that this would involve no extra plane fare,\nand invited to that a brief stop-over would probably attention\nin this with Casilda, since we both feel will prove to be a\nvaluable source of information. And during my brief stay in\nParis I realized that she was probably \"cultivating\" me for\na very specific purpose: the maternal (Figueroa) side of her\nfamily has some silver mines which have not been in production\nsince the Civil War, and Bob Buckley had told her that I rep-\nresented a group of New York investors who are looking for\nsilver properties. She broached the subject on the day I\nleft Paris, and I asked her to forward any and all available\ninformation on the said mines. If, in fact, the Figueroses\ndo have economically-operable mines, we could then establish\ngenuinely firm relations with the Ustas, Figueroses, Griclos,\nand others.\n\nIn any event, I would suggest that we maintain close\nrelations with Casilda Ustas Figuerosa and her friend Gloria de las\nBarcenas.\nIn the following list is a list of the largest business enterprises in Spain and the names of the persons who own or control them. Whenever possible I have noted the importance for each company, bearing in mind that Spanish businessmen are not always totally candid in their financial statements. But aside from the accuracy or inaccuracy of these reports, one soon realizes that certain individuals and/or families control two or more of these companies and perhaps many others of lesser magnitude. And in my conversations with several industriales (Zaragoza, Valencia, Alonso-Casillas, Cervera, Carreras, et al) some of these same names kept popping up time and again, thus leading me to conclude - at least tentatively - that the following individuals or families are the leading industrialists and financiers of Spain:\n\n1. Juan March Cervera\n2. Pedro Cervera Barba, Conde del Cervera\n3. Ignacio Villalonga Villalba, Marques de la Vara Inclan\n4. Alfonso Pierre - and brothers Ignacio and Arturo\n5. Jose Maria Criel, Marques de Casa Criel\n6. Marques de la Cueva (Casa de la Cueva)\n7. Luis Urquijo y Landaeta - and other Urquijos\n8. Joaquin Urquijo Estiniques\n9. Eduardo Urquijo Cagolatruch\n10. Eduardo Urquijo Cagolatruch\nBanking in Spain is dominated by the \"Big Five\", which include the Banco de Bilbao, Banco de Vizcaya, Banco de Santander, Banco de Madrid, and Banco de Valencia. These banks are located in the commercial and industrial centers of the country. Several of these banks are closely linked to various members of the banking families, and many actively serve on the boards of the largest companies in Spain.\n\n**Banco Central**\nIgnacio Villalonga Villalba, Marqu\u00e9s de la Vega Incl\u00e1n\nLuis Escobar is apparently next in line\n\n**Banco Espa\u00f1ol de Credito (BENEST)**\nMarqu\u00e9s de la Sota - G\u00f3mez-Abascal family\n\n**Banco Hispano-Americano**\nJos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Escudero, Chief of Board\nLuis Escobar is director\n\n**Banco de Vizcaya**\nPedro G\u00f3mez de Urrutia, Conde del Cadagua\n\n**Banco Bilbao**\nAlfonso de Borb\u00f3n family allegedly controls\n\n**Banco Espa\u00f1ol**\nAlfonso, Antonio and Ignacio Pierr\u00f3\n\n**Banco de Santander**\nMarcelino Bot\u00edn\n\n**Banco Urquijo**\nMostly owned by Urquijo family\nJuan Blasco is managing director\nValores en MM/pts\n\n- Mecanica Espanola\n- Electricas de Cataluna\n- Cia Sevillana de Electricidad\n\nEmpresa Nacional de Electricidad (UNEDSA)\nLuis Saenz de Tejada de Urban\nInmovilizado Neto 5,451,699,000 pts\n\nEmpresa Nacional Hidroel\u00e9ctrica de Ribagorza\nJose Maria Aguirre Gonzalez (EMER)\nInmovilizado Neto 11,453,093,000 pts\n\nElectra de Vizcaya S.A.\nLuis Maria de Ybarra\nInmovilizado Neto 3,624,349,000 pts\n\nElectricas Leonesias S.A.\nLuis de Usia y Gualda (Conde de los Gaitanes)\nInmovilizado Neto 1,916,921,000 pts\n\nElectricas Reunidas de Zaragoza S.A.\nGonzalo Jose Ibanez\nInmovilizado Neto 4,002,272,000 pts\n\nElectricas de Cataluna S.A.\nJuan March Cervera\nInmovilizado Neto 12,918,555,000 pts\n\nHidroel\u00e9ctrica Espanola S.A.\nJose Maria Oriol, Marques de Casa Oriol\nInmovilizado Neto 24,821,133,000 pts\n\nIberduero S.A.\nPedro Carvajal Basabe, Conde del Cadagua\nInmovilizado Neto 22,661,143,000 pts\n\nUnion Electrica Madrile\u00f1a S.A.\nJose Cabrera Felipe\nInmovilizado Neto 6,641,013,000\nCompa\u00f1\u00eda Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles S.A.\nFelipe de Cabo y Urquijo, Arques de Fontalba (Urquijo)\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,237,063,000 pts\n\nSociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Construcciones Zuberoa & Wilcox\nLeandro Jos\u00e9: Erroneo o Ibarra (Ibarra)\nInmovilizado: 2,835,555,000 pts\n\nCia. Euskalduna Construcci\u00f3n de Egu\u00edluz\nJuan Antonio de Alzamora y Zavala\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,193,262,000 pts\n\nGeneral Electrica Espa\u00f1ola S.A.\nPedro Carre\u00f1o y Basabe, Conde de Cadagua (here again)\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,499,264,000 pts\n\nMateriales y Construcciones S.A.\nJoaqu\u00edn Reig Rodr\u00edguez\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,278,432,000 pts\n\nAltos Hornos de Vizcaya S.A.\nJuan de Aguirre (de Aguirre again)\nInmovilizado Neto: 15,590,663,000 pts\n\nS.A. de Sociedad\nPedro P. de Gandarias Urquijo (Urquijo again)\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,686,985,000 pts\n\nSociedad Metall\u00fargica Duro Falguera\nLuis de Urquijo y Landecho, Marqu\u00e9s de Bol\u00edvar\nInmovilizado Neto: 4,262,745,000 pts (Urquijo)\n\nEmpresa Nacional Sider\u00fargica S.A. (INSA)\nAureo Fern\u00e1ndez Avil\u00e9s\nInmovilizado Neto: 27,764,834,000 pts\n\nEspa\u00f1ola de Zino S.A. (ZINSA)\nIgnacio Villalba (shall but note Villal)\nInmovilizado Neto: 61,219,310,000 pts\n\nMinero Sider\u00fargica de Ponderosa\nLuis de Uss\u00eda y Gavelda, Conde de los Gaitanes (Uss\u00eda again)\nLuis de Uss\u00eda y Gavelda\nInmovilizado Neto: 1,062,120,000 pts\nA. J. C. I.\nJos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Valle Taberner\nInmovilizado Neto 3,047,617,000 pts\n\nTec-Car\u00fa\u00f1ena\nPedro de Cuenca y Bastida, Conde de C\u00e1diz\nInmovilizado Neto 1,231,755,000\n\nEnerg\u00eda e Industrias Aragonesas S.A.\nC\u00e9sar Mar\u00eda de Urquijo y Landecho\nInmovilizado Neto 200,518,000 (note: Peir\u00f3)\n\nIndustrias Qu\u00edmicas Canarias S.A.\nConqu\u00edn Raig Rodr\u00edguez\nInmovilizado Neto 423,594,000 (small - but note Peir\u00f3)\n\nNitritos de Castilla S.A.\nJos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Arteche y Chavarr\u00ed (de Arteche again)\nInmovilizado Neto 1,177,443,000 pts\n\nSociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Fabricaciones Nitrogenadas S.A. (Sefanitr\u00f3)\nV\u00edctor de Chavarr\u00ed y And\u00fajar, Marqu\u00e9s de Tr\u00edano\nInmovilizado Neto 1,472,574,000 pts\n\nSociedad Nacional Industrias Aplicaciones Cal\u00fascas (SNICA)\nEugenio Caldeiro Montes-R\u00edos\nInmovilizado Neto 7,911,754,000 pts\n\nUni\u00f3n Espa\u00f1ola de Explosivos\nIgnacio Herrero Garc\u00eda, Marqu\u00e9s de Alcal\u00e1\nInmovilizado Neto 3,612,436,000 pts\n\nCompa\u00f1\u00eda Espa\u00f1ola de Petr\u00f3leos S.A.\nIgnacio Villalonga Villalba (note: this name)\nInmovilizado Neto 7,019,770,000 pts\n\nEmpresa Nacional Calvo Sotelo (ENCASE)\nMiguel \u00c1ngel Ochoa Arru\u00f1ach\nInmovilizado Neto 11,759,223,000 pts\n\nRefiner\u00eda de Petr\u00f3leos de Espa\u00f1a S.A. (REPESA)\nJos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda de Lagunza y de las F\u00edbas\nInmovilizado Neto 4,359,932,000 pts\nTRANSPORT AND ACCESSORIES\n\nCitroen Hispania S.A. produced 22,700 in 1955\nF.I.M.S.A. produced 11,034 in 1955\nBarri\u00e9re Diesel S.A. produced 6,710 in 1955\nFASA Renault produced 8,141 in 1955\nMotor Iberica produced 6,834 in 1955\n\nSociedad An\u00f3nima Fabricaci\u00f3n de Neum\u00e1ticos Michelin\nRoberto K. Luiscaux Michelin\nInmovilizado Neto 2,125,212.00 pts.\n\nProductos Pirelli S.A. (tires)\nGuillermo Ascoitia y Muesca\nInmovilizado Neto 2,484,173,000 pts.\n\nSociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Autos de Turismo, S.A.T.\nJose Ortiz Echague\nInmovilizado Neto 3,627,515,000 pts.\n\nFOOD AND BEVERAGES\n\nSociedad General Azucarera de Espa\u00f1a\nAlejandro Fernandez de Araoz\nActive Disponible y Realizable 1,343,241,013 pts.\n\nS.A. de Aguila\nJose Antonio de la Gasta\u00f1eta\nADR 2,876,921,000 pts.\n\nCompa\u00f1\u00eda de Industrias Agr\u00edcolas\nManuel Garc\u00eda de Cisneros\nCapitales Permanentes 1,471,423,000 pts.\nInstitution\n\nTASS S.A.\n\nMarta Guzm\u00e1n\nCalle Barrio del R\u00edo Jes\u00fas y Bartolo Arrieta\n\nEMT S.A.\n\nJos\u00e9 Ram\u00f3n\nCalle Barrio de la Concepci\u00f3n\n\nKIAZ S.A.\n\nMart\u00ed brothers (Irene, Juan and Felipe)\nSeveral companies in roads, horses, furniture\n\nAgust\u00edn S.A.\n\nJos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Aguirre Gonzalo\nOne of the oldest and largest construction companies\n\nUnited Pictures and Distribution\n\nCervia Films\n\nCatalina Gonz\u00e1lez\nLargest producer, distributor, exhibitor in Spain\n\nIzaro Films S.A.\n\nFlorentino Reynal\nLargest distributor and exhibitor in Madrid\n\nFerito Films\n\nEnrico Ferito\nIndependent producer (allied with Paramount Pictures)\n\nInstruments and Equipment\n\nFranca Espa\u00f1ola S.A.\n\nGuillermo Pinto y C\u00eda\nPublishes El Sol, largest daily, and other papers\n\nDiario Vanguardi\u00e1\n\nCerde de Gato\nLargest daily in Barcelona, publishes many, etc.\n\nAguilar S.A.\n\nAguilar family\nLeading book publisher, also magazines\nCasa de la Rosa\nCasa de la Rosa\nCity-building company based in Palma, Mallorca\n\nHotels and Resorts\n\nCadena Hoteles S.A.\nFederico brothers\nOwn about 30 hotels on Costa del Sol\nBegan as travel agency and booked\n\nHUSA S.A.\nHotel chain mainly controlled by James Cuntal\nHas about 14 hotels in Spain\n\nDepartment Stores\n\nCallejas Preciados\nJose Fernandez Rodriguez\nHave about 17 stores throughout Spain\n\nEl Corte Ingles\nPeach Arecos\nHave about 5 stores\n| Company Name | Address | City, State/Province |\n|--------------|---------|---------------------|\n| Arco Steel Corporation | 703 Curtis Street | Middletown, Ohio |\n| Bank of America | 35/41 Front Street | New York, N.Y. |\n| Borden Foods Company | 250 Madison Avenue | New York, N.Y., 10017 |\n| California Texas Oil Corp. | 250 Madison Avenue | New York, N.Y., 10017 |\n\n**American Firms, Subsidiaries and Affiliates - Spain**\n\n**1. Arco Steel Corporation**\n- Address: 703 Curtis Street, Middletown, Ohio\n- Affiliates: Arco, S.A., Arco San Pedro 17, Barcelona (16), Manufacturer of steel tubing, distributor.\n\n**2. Bank of America**\n- Address: 35/41 Front Street, New York, N.Y.\n- Affiliates: 1) Banco Comercial para America, S.A., Paseo de la Castellana 15, Madrid (1), Commercial banking.\n- 2) Banco Intercontinental Espa\u00f1ol, Paseo de la Castellana 29, Madrid (2), Investment banking.\n\n**3. Borden Foods Company**\n- Address: 250 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10017\n- Affiliates: 1) Borden, S.A.E., Calle de la Castellana 15, Madrid (15), Distribution of foodstuffs.\n\n**4. California Texas Oil Corp.**\n- Address: 250 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10017\n- Affiliates: 1) California Texas Oil Corp., Paseo del Prado 25, Madrid (24), Oil refining.\n\n**Affiliates of above concern:**\n- Arco, S.A.\n- Arco San Pedro 17, Barcelona (16)\n- Borden, S.A.E., Calle de la Castellana 15, Madrid (15)\n- California Texas Oil Corp., Paseo del Prado 25, Madrid (24)\n- Oil refining.\nContinental Can Company\n122 Third Avenue\nNew York, N.Y. 10017\n\nContinental International Finance Corporation\n271 South La Salle Street\nChicago, Illinois\n\nDeere and Company\nMoline, Illinois\n\nB&G Chemical Company\n1500 Main Street\nMidland, Michigan\n\n1) Deere & Company, S.A.\n   271 South La Salle Street\n   Chicago, Illinois\n   Tractors, farm equipment, and investments.\n\n2) Continental Can Company, S.A.\n   122 Third Avenue\n   New York, N.Y. 10017\n   Metal container manufacturer.\n\n3) Continental International Finance Corporation\n   271 South La Salle Street\n   Chicago, Illinois\n   Finance and investment services.\n\n4) Deere and Company\n   Moline, Illinois\n   Tractors, farm equipment, and investments.\n\n5) B&G Chemical Company\n   1500 Main Street\n   Midland, Michigan\n   Chemicals and plastics.\n\n1) Cia. Metalurgica del Sur, S.A.\n   Avda. Andres Segovia 21\n   Lima, Peru\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n2) Cia. Metalurgica Andaluza, S.A.\n   Seville, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n3) Cia. Metalurgica Logronesa, S.A.\n   Logrono, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n4) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n5) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n6) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n7) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n8) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n9) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n10) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n11) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n12) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n13) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n14) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n15) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n16) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n17) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n18) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n19) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n20) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n21) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n22) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n23) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n24) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n25) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n26) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n27) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n28) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n29) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n30) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n31) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n32) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n33) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n34) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n35) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n36) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n37) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n38) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n39) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n40) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n41) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n42) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n43) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n44) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n45) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n46) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n47) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n48) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n49) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n\n50) Cia. Metalurgica de Envasos, S.A.\n    Madrid, Spain\n    Manufacturer of metal containers.\n2) Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.\n\n3) Firestone Hispania, S.A.\n   Avenida 606\n   Madrid, Spain\n   Manufacturer of tires and other rubber products.\n\n4) Corporaci\u00f3n Espa\u00f1ola de Pl\u00e1sticos, S.A.\n   Libra 1\n   Manufacturer of plastic articles\n\nAffiliates of Firestone Hispania:\n\na) Rambler-Brucke, S.A.\n\nb) Nuvit, S.A.\n\nc) Ximenez y Compa\u00f1\u00eda, S.A.\n\nd) Julio Gal\u00e1n, S.A.\n\ne) Mecanocentro Catalana, S.A.\nFood Machinery Corporation\n1050 Valencia Avenue\nSan Jose, California 95126\n\nInternational Machinery Corporation Espa\u00f1ola, S.A.\nDr. Mara\u00f1\u00f3n 35\nMadrid (16)\nSale and rental of food processing machinery.\n\nFood Machinery & Chemical Co.\n(T.C. Corporation)\nP.O. Box 1176\nSan Jose, California\n\nFood Machinery Espa\u00f1ola, S.A.\nPza 29\nValencia 3\nManufacturer of fruit packing machinery.\n\nGeneral Electric Company\nInternational Division\n159 Madison Avenue\nNew York, N.Y. 10016\n\n1) International General Electric Company of Spain, S.A.\nC/Plaza Espa\u00f1a\nA.M. Jose Antonio 28\nMadrid (16)\nRepresentations.\n\n2) General Electric Espa\u00f1ola, S.A.\nPaseo Federico Moyano 6\nMadrid\nManufacturer of electric machinery and equipment.\n\n3) Electrificaci\u00f3n Espa\u00f1ola, S.A. (E.E.E.S.A.)\nC/General Guti\u00e9rrez 3\nMadrid\nManufacturer and distribution of electric household appliances.\n1) Monsanto Chemical Co.\n   600 Lindbergh Boulevard\n   St. Louis, Missouri 63166\n   (Through the Panamanian subsidiary).\n\n2) Monsanto Agropecuaria de Espa\u00f1a, S.A.\n   Escuela 366\n   Zaragoza (16)\n   Manufacturer of feed supplements.\n\n3) Monsanto, S.A.\n   Escuela 367\n   Zaragoza (16)\n   Manufacturer of plastic materials.\n\nAffiliates of above concern:\n\na) Monsanto Tezontle, S.A.\n\nb) Equo Qu\u00edmica, S.A.\n\nc) S.A.E., S.A. de Desarrollos Industriales.\n\n2) Phillips Petroleum Company\n   Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003\n\n3) Cemex, Empresa para la Industria Petrol\u00edfera, S.A.\n   Avda. General\u00edsimo 36\n   Saltillo (16)\n   Petrochemicals manufacturer.\n\n4) Phillips, S.A.\n   Industrias Qu\u00edmicas de M\u00e9xico, S.A.\n   Saltillo (16)\n   Manufacturer of plastic containers.\n\n5) Phillips Oleoqu\u00edmica, S.A.\n   (Affiliate of Bartlesville in 1971)\n   Saltillo (2)\n   Petrochemicals products.\n1) U.S. Steel Company\n35 William Penn Place\nPittsburgh, Pennsylvania\n\n2) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nManufacturer of iron and steel.\n\n3) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nManufacturer of electrical machinery.\n\n4) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nManufacturer of television and receivers.\n\n5) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nIndustrial Projects.\n\n6) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n7) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n8) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n9) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n10) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n11) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n12) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n13) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n14) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n15) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n16) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n17) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n18) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n19) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n20) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n21) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n22) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n23) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n24) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n25) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n26) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n27) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n28) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n29) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n30) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n31) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n32) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n33) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n34) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n35) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n36) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n37) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n38) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n39) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n40) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n41) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n42) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n43) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n44) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n45) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n46) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n47) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n48) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n49) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n50) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n51) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n52) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n53) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n54) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n55) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n56) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n57) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n58) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\n\n59) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nSales subsidiary.\n\n60) Acesa, S.A.\nAvenida de la Victoria, 2\nMadrid (16)\nPetroleum exploration.\nDuring our last session in Madrid, our bank representative\n\n...and I discussed the possibility and advisability of re-\n\ncountry having a representative in a part-time basis.\n\nBut we have a public relations office which specializes in public-\n\nizing motion picture productions during the shooting phase\n\nand therefore has good contacts with producers, directors,\n\nactors, etc. In countries like Spain movie people are much\n\nsought-after by local businessmen and their spouses, and they\n\nfrequently mix with the top echelons of society and govern-\n\nment. (The Spanish government, incidentally, frequently sub-\n\nsidizes motion pictures which \"portray the better aspects of\n\nour country.\") Bob took me to a party hosted by Cesario\n\nGonzalez, largest movie producer and distributor in Spain,\n\nand there I met the following: the Marques de Villac de la\n\nSierra (Bank of Spain), Compan de la Roca (railroad ship-building\n\nfamily), Florentino Bayona (Madrid's principal theatre owner),\n\nTed Richman (producer of the Hal Roach films), Lee J. Cobb,\n\nand several other people from Madrid's high-society business\n\ncommunity.\n\nIn addition to his regular publicity job, Roach\n\nhas another big asset: his wife, Dorothy, who is the most\n\nbeautiful and charming woman I can imagine by entire stay in\n\nSpain. Owing from the attention she received at the Gonzalez\n\nparty, I believe of those upper-crust people started to know...\nThe Romans quite well - I would guess that Barbara opens\nmy doors for Bob. On one particular evening when I took\nthe Romans to dinner at one of the better restaurants, we\nran into Mr. and Mrs. Felipe Martinez (he's one of the\nbrothers who own Martinez y Cia., one of Spain's largest con-\nstruction companies and a client of Bob's), and both the\nMartinez pushed over Barbara and begged her to drop by for a\nSunday brunch since Bob would be out of town on business.\n\nI first met Rodney in Mexico City when he was handling\npublicity for the production of VIVA KARLA, a movie starring\nBrigitte Bardot and Jeanne Moreau. You may recall that I\ninterviewed Moreau for DIALOGUES and was invited to spend several\ndays with the company when it went on location near Veracruz.\nWell, during those few days Bob and I became rather close friends,\nand I had a good opportunity to observe him under a variety\nof circumstances, professional and otherwise. He's intelligent,\ndirect, holds his liquor well, and has the kind of inquisitive-\nness that could be useful to the bank. He seems rather non-\npolitical to me, but I would assume that he probably votes\nDemocratic.\n\nSince he has just expanded his office, thereby increasing\nhis overhead, Bob would probably welcome some additional cash\nand might therefore be amenable to recruitment. And, of course,\nwe must bear in mind that his two associates are Casilda Uria\nFigueroa and Clara de las Barcas, the two well-connected\nwomen I have mentioned elsewhere. It would be most helpful\nFor us to have access to Rooney's cross-referenced list of\n\"Syria's top business and society people,\" which was\nprepared for him by the information service involved.\n\nCD has asked if I could approach Rooney to work for us,\nand I very emphatically pointed it out that it would be such\nas risky. If he should turn us down - or even if he should\naccept - I would be fully exposed to him and to some of our\ncurrent friends. Consequently, I think he should be approached\n(if, indeed, we decide to do so) by someone totally unrelated\nto me or to ICAP.\nThe Institute is located in Barcelona and is a graduate school of the University of Navarra, which is directed by OPUS DEI.\n\nThe director of this most impressive organization is Professor Antonio Valero, who is also currently President of the European Association of Management Training Centers, of which OPUS DEI is an active member. The Institute's work is carried out in several directions: basic and applied research, management training and executive development programs, education in business management for university students, international programs, documentation and information services, etc.\n\nMoreover, most of OPUS DEI's professors are engaged independently as consultants to private firms.\n\nTop management officials from all parts of Spain attend the annual seminars of the Institute, and there is little doubt that OPUS DEI's having and will continue to have a considerable influence on the business life of the country.\n\nAn indication of OPUS DEI's direct influence is the fact that the Institute's president, clearly stated that \"the success of the Institute is measured by the number of its graduates who are able to find employment in the business world.\" Although many Spanish are not to characterize the OPUS DEI as \"prestigious,\" the fact that a businessperson tells his son \"any young man who attends OPUS DEI will have a head-start in business.\"\nI was surprised to visit the IESE in its close\nproximity to the Harvard Graduate School of Business. A considerable\nproportion of its alumni and faculty is Harvard-educated,\nand many of the advisors and visiting professors are also\nfrom the \"other side of the Charles River.\" On the attached\nsheet I have listed the names of IESE people who have attended\nHarvard's business school.\n\nOne should also note the practicality of the IESE directors\nin selecting Barcelona as its headquarters, even though the\nparent institution (the University of Navarra) is located\nin Pamplona.\nABADIA POCHINO, Leopoldo\nDirector Ingeniero de Industrias Textiles, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Zaragoza.\nTitulado en la Escuela de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad de Harvard.\nPol\u00edtica de Empresa.\n\nALBERTI RICART, Alberto (*)\nDirector Ingeniero Naval, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Navales de Madrid.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico.\nComportamiento Humano en la Organizaci\u00f3n.\n\nALONSO NICOL\u00c1S, Fernando\nDirector de Industrias Textiles, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Zaragoza.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico Visita.\nDirecci\u00f3n Comercial.\n\nANGANIZA RAM\u00cdZ, Antonio\nIngeniero en Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona.\nProfesor Mercad\u00f3logo, Escuela de Altos Estudios Mercantiles de Barcelona.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico.\nPol\u00edtica de Empresa.\n\nARQUER ARMANGUE, Joaqu\u00edn de\nDirector Ingeniero Industrial, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Barcelona.\nProfesor Agrupado.\nComportamiento Humano en la Organizaci\u00f3n.\n\nBAY\u00d3N MART\u00cd, Gabriel (*)\nIngeniero en Ciencias, Universidad de Barcelona.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico.\nRelaciones Externas.\n\nBILLOT FONTE, Manuel (*)\nIngeniero en Ciencias, Universidad de Barcelona.\nProfesor Agrupado.\nPol\u00edtica de Empresa.\n\nCAMACHO Y FERN\u00c1NDEZ DE CANEDO, Fernando\nDirector de Industrias Textiles, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Madrid.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico Visita.\nDirecci\u00f3n Financiera.\n\nCAVALL\u00c9 PINOS, Carlos\nDirector Ingeniero Industrial, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Barcelona.\nTitulado en la Escuela de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad de Harvard.\nProfesor Agrupado.\nDirecci\u00f3n de Producci\u00f3n.\n\nDURANTE CAGIGAL, Jos\u00e9 (*)\nDirector de Industrias Textiles, E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Comercio, C\u00e1diz y Postrera, de Madrid.\nColaborador Cient\u00edfico.\nDirecci\u00f3n de Producci\u00f3n.\n\nL\u00d3PEZ DE S\u00c1NCHEZ, Antonio\nIngeniero en Ciencias, Universidad de Valencia.\nProfesor Agrupado.\n\n(*) Titulado en Harvard.\nASISTENTES DE INVESTIGACI\u00d3N\n\nDONARDO VILARANCA, Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda\nFacultad de Ingenier\u00eda, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nFRANCISCO ARANZAZU\nFacultad de Ingenier\u00eda, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nJUAN DE LA CRUZ, Francisco\nFacultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nJAVIER LOPEZ, Esteban Pedro\nFacultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nMIGUEL GARC\u00cdA, Jos\u00e9 O\nFacultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nJUAN DAVILA, Juan Jos\u00e9 A\nFacultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona\nDepartamento de Econom\u00eda\n\nCon el fin de realizar una investigaci\u00f3n sobre el tema, se han consultado los siguientes documentos:\n\n1. Documento de la Facultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona, correspondiente al a\u00f1o acad\u00e9mico de 1955-56.\n2. Documento de la Facultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona, correspondiente al a\u00f1o acad\u00e9mico de 1956-57.\n3. Documento de la Facultad de Ciencias Econ\u00f3micas, Universidad de Barcelona, correspondiente al a\u00f1o acad\u00e9mico de 1957-58.\nNo se proporcion\u00f3 un texto para representaci\u00f3n en formato natural.\nMost of our contacts in Madrid will be with the wealthy and influential industrialists in Spain, and I'm happy to note that I might be able to meet him on a casual social basis through an old friend and Harvard alumnus, Paul Temple, president of Ebro Electric, S.A., and president of the National S.A., a subsidiary of Compania de Ebro Electricidad, which is principally owned by Clark March. I spent considerable time with Paul during my brief stay in Barcelona and gathered (from certain remarks between him and an associate) that he has a close personal relationship with Clark and Ebro Electric March. He, in fact, offered to introduce me to Clark March on my next visit to Barcelona\u2014probably for lunch or dinner. Moreover, Paul expressed great interest in my projected Fortune-style article on Spanish financiers and industrialists and has offered to advise me on the best people to meet and to introduce me to some of his business friends in Barcelona and Madrid.\n**ACCOUNTING**\n\n**TRIP TO SPAIN**\n\nAdvanced on June 24 by ICAP: $1,200\n\n**Expenditures:**\n\n| Date       | Description                                      | Amount |\n|------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 25 June, 1967 | Trip to NY airport & tip                        | $10.75 |\n|            | Trip to airport                                 | $5.00  |\n|            |                                                   | $15.25 |\n| 26 June, 1967 | Trip to airport (Madrid)                        | $5.00  |\n|            | Trip to hotel (got gyped in unmeted cab)         | $4.00  |\n|            | Trip of hotel                                   | $7.50  |\n|            | Hotel room                                       | $15.00 |\n|            | Total service plus tips                         | $4.10  |\n|            | Telephone                                        | $5.00  |\n|            | Breakfast                                        | $1.50  |\n|            | Lunch at Chiguray + tip                         | $12.20 |\n|            | Drinks at Romey + coffee                        | $7.20  |\n|            | Car fare                                         | $1.60  |\n|            | Phone calls                                      | $0.50  |\n|            | Dinner at Romey (tip there only)                 | $2.50  |\n\nTotal: $55.75\n| Date  | Description                                      | Amount |\n|-------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 27 Jun | Laundry & valet                                 | 3.60   |\n|       | Breakfast & tip                                 | 1.80   |\n|       | Phone call                                       | 0.50   |\n|       | Cat food                                         | 1.00   |\n|       | Lunch of Donald Daniel (attorney)                | 13.50  |\n|       | Drinks & Medicine (at attorney)                  | 4.20   |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | Dinner & Medicine (long hair only)               | 7.20   |\n|       |                                                  | 46.20  |\n| 28 Jun | Breakfast                                       | 1.80   |\n|       | Cat food                                         | 1.00   |\n|       | Phone call                                       | 0.50   |\n|       | Total dinner & meals                            | 1.80   |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | Drinks & Lopez-Munoz (attorney)                  | 9.50   |\n|       | Drinks & Rematti (more produce)                  | 3.50   |\n|       | Dinner & Cat Munoz & Guillaume                   | 23.00  |\n|       | Cat food & above                                 | 1.20   |\n|       |                                                  | 58.00  |\n| Date  | Description                                      | Amount |\n|-------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 19 Jun | Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.50   |\n|       | Valet                                            | 2.00   |\n|       | Laundry                                          | 4.10   |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | Long distance call (N.Y. office)                | 23.80  |\n|       | Lunch                                           | 9.50   |\n|       | cab fare + tips                                 | 1.50   |\n|       | Drinks at Union + tips                           | 5.20   |\n|       | Dinner at the Tidewater (3 drinks)               | 7.50   |\n|       |                                                 | 62.35  |\n| 20 Jun | Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.50   |\n|       | Long distance to home                           | 27.18  |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | cab fare + tips                                 | 1.50   |\n|       | Lunch at Colgatey (beer + dinner)                | 19.30  |\n|       | Drinks at Daniels + Kenzetti (more people)      | 7.80   |\n|       | cab fare + tips                                 | 1.50   |\n|       |                                                 | 67.98  |\n| Date       | Description                        | Amount |\n|------------|------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 1, 1947 | Breakfast                          | 1.80   |\n|            | cab fare + tip                     | 1.20   |\n|            | phone call                         | .60    |\n|            | Drink w/ medicine + honey          | 3.00   |\n|            | Snack w/ medicine (my share)       | 1.20   |\n|            | Hotel room                         | 15.00  |\n|            | Dinner w/ Betty + Dessert          | 17.50  |\n|            | cab fare + tip                     | 1.20   |\n|            |                                    | 46.50  |\n| July 2, 1947 | Breakfast                          | 1.60   |\n|            | Hotel room                         | 15.00  |\n|            | phone call                         | .60    |\n|            | Lunch w/ Richard + Stines (more produce) | 3.50 |\n|            | cab fare + tip                     | 1.60   |\n|            | Dinner + tip                       | 3.00   |\n|            |                                    | 43.20  |\n| Date   | Description                  | Amount |\n|--------|------------------------------|--------|\n| July 3 | Breakfast                    | 1.80   |\n|        | Cab fare                     | 1.50   |\n|        | Valet                        | 1.50   |\n|        | Hotel room                   | 15.00  |\n|        | Dinner w/ Wine & Bartender   | 21.50  |\n|        | Drinks w/ Roomy              | 5.40   |\n|        | Phone calls                  | 6.00   |\n|        | Total                        | 57.30  |\n\n| July 4 | Description                  | Amount |\n|--------|------------------------------|--------|\n|        | Breakfast                    | 1.80   |\n|        | Cab fare                     | 2.00   |\n|        | Lunch w/ Train - Chicago     | 17.10  |\n|        | Hotel room                   | 15.00  |\n|        | Phone calls                  | 1.60   |\n|        | Laundry                      | 5.40   |\n|        | Valet                        | 1.75   |\n|        | Drink w/ Daniels             | 2.15   |\n|        | Dinner w/ Roomy (Mr. & Mrs.) | 13.20  |\n|        | Total                        | 59.20  |\n| Date   | Description                                      | Amount |\n|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 5 | Breakfast + Tip                                 | 1.70   |\n|        | Lunch                                           | 1.90   |\n|        | Hotel room                                      | 15.00  |\n|        | Book on \"American Express\" (500 pts)            | 15.00  |\n|        | Magazine + drink                               | 1.40   |\n|        | Drinks w/ Robert + luncheon (more people)       | 8.20   |\n|        | Dinner w/ Robert (my share)                     | 8.70   |\n|        | Total for above + tip                          | 53.70  |\n\n| July 6 | Breakfast + Tip                                 | 1.90   |\n|        | Lunch                                           | 3.20   |\n|        | Velt + Tip                                      | 3.00   |\n|        | Hotel room                                      | 15.00  |\n|        | Shoe rental                                     | 1.70   |\n|        | Lunch w/ Bob, Sandra (lunch)                    | 11.20  |\n|        | Drinks w/ Aparna + Medora                       | 4.50   |\n|        | Dinner w/ Col. Gardner (attorney)               | 14.10  |\n|        | Total for above + tip                          | 56.00  |\n| Date   | Description                                      | Amount |\n|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 7 | Breakfast + tip                                 | 2.10   |\n|        | Cat fare + tip                                  | 1.75   |\n|        | Lunch + Cola (drinks)                           | 12.70  |\n|        | Hotel room                                      | 15.00  |\n|        | Dinner + drink + tip                            | 2.50   |\n|        |                                                | 39.75  |\n|        |                                                | 38.75  |\n| July 8 | Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.80   |\n|        | Hotel room                                      | 15.00  |\n|        | Long distance call to office                    | 27.18  |\n|        | Lunch                                          | 3.25   |\n|        | Cat fare + tip                                  | 1.40   |\n|        | Phone call                                      | .60    |\n|        | Dinner + Cola (drinks)                          | 19.20  |\n|        |                                                | 70.33  |\n|        |                                                | 70.33  |\n| Date  | Description                                      | Amount |\n|-------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 7| Breakfast                                        | 1.70   |\n|       | Coffee                                           | 1.40   |\n|       | Lunch w/ dinner (or share of lunch with)         | 14.80  |\n|       | (more crock at Toledo)                           |        |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | Dinner w/ Hiram Coll. Dinner (Tokyo)             | 7.50   |\n|       | Chabu calla                                      | 1.60   |\n|       | Drink w/ Hiram                                  | 2.50   |\n|       | Dinner w/ Hiram + Lee J. Coll. (only)            | 6.50   |\n|       |                                                  | 49.90  |\n|       |                                                  | 49.90  |\n| July 10| Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.80   |\n|       | Laundry                                          | 5.10   |\n|       | Valet                                            | 1.00   |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 15.00  |\n|       | Lunch w/ Elephant Reginald (22.80)               | 11.60  |\n|       | Coffee                                           | 1.90   |\n|       | Dinner w/ Hiram + Joseph & Le Blanc (Tokyo)      | 7.10   |\n|       | Drink w/ Elephant-Castello                       | 3.60   |\n|       |                                                  | 46.50  |\n|       |                                                  | 46.50  |\n### July 11, 1967\n\n| Item                                      | Amount |\n|-------------------------------------------|--------|\n| Breakfast + tip                          | 1.50   |\n| Hotel room                                | 15.00  |\n| Phone calls                               | 1.00   |\n| Cab fare                                  | 1.70   |\n| Lunch                                     | 2.70   |\n| Drinks at Union Station, Boston            | 1.80   |\n| Dinner at Union Station                   | 10.00  |\n| **Total**                                 | **38.20** |\n\n### July 12, 1967\n\n| Item                                      | Amount |\n|-------------------------------------------|--------|\n| Breakfast + tip                          | 1.80   |\n| Cab fare to + from airport + tip         | 1.90   |\n| Lunch + Catering                         | 2.10   |\n| Cab to Madrid airport + tip              | 2.20   |\n| Luggage - excess weight                   | 2.90   |\n| Tape to Madrid hotel maid                | 9.00   |\n| Tape to hotel + airport parking          | 1.00   |\n| Barcelona airport to Hotel               | 2.70   |\n| Tape at Barcelona airport + Hotel        | 1.00   |\n| Hotel room                               | 9.20   |\n| Long distance call to NY office          | 32.75  |\n| Dinner                                   | 3.80   |\n| **Total**                                 | **72.85** |\n| Date       | Description                                      | Amount |\n|------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 13, 1967 | Breakfast & Tip                                  | 1.60   |\n|            | Hotel room                                       | 9.20   |\n|            | Lunch at Paul Temple                             | 12.80  |\n|            | Cab fare                                         | 1.60   |\n|            | Dinner at Lice Stainer (my share)                | 9.40   |\n|            | Phone calls                                      | 4.00   |\n|            |                                                  | 35.40  |\n| July 14    | Breakfast & Tip                                  | 1.60   |\n|            | Lunch at Stainer (my share)                      | 3.10   |\n|            | Cab to Barcelona airport & Tip                   | 2.70   |\n|            | Tip to maid & porter (Barcelona)                 | 1.30   |\n|            | Tip at Barcelona airport                        | .50    |\n|            | Excess weight (luggage)                          | 1.50   |\n|            | Bus & Cab from Rome airport to hotel             | 2.50   |\n|            | Hotel room (Rome) + tax                          | 23.00  |\n|            | Banks of Tiberi, Venice + fees                    | 1.20   |\n|            |                                                  | 49.70  |\n| Date  | Description                                      | Amount |\n|-------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 15 | Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.90   |\n|       | Hotel room                                       | 25.00  |\n|       | Lunch                                           | 2.00   |\n|       | Dinner or dinner + fare (share)                 | 8.70   |\n|       | Cab fare + tip                                  | 2.50   |\n|       | Total                                           | 40.90  |\n\n| Date  | Description                                      | Amount |\n|-------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| July 16 | Breakfast + tip                                 | 1.75   |\n|       | Lunch                                           | 2.90   |\n|       | Phone calls                                      | .70    |\n|       | Drink of Hawaii                                  | 3.20   |\n|       | Cab + bus to Paris airport                      | 2.70   |\n|       | Tips at hotel + airport                         | 3.00   |\n|       | Tips at N.Y. airport                            | .75    |\n|       | Tips: NY airport to home + tip                  | 10.75  |\n|       | Total                                           | 23.75  |\n\n| Description                                      | Amount |\n|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| Paris airport tax 25 Fr                          | 5.00   |\n| Barcelona airport tax                            | 2.80   |\n| Purchase of travel tickets                       | 12.00  |\n\nTotal: 23.75\n**Expenditure Trip to Wash**\n\n**June 20**\n- Cab from home to airport + tip: $8.25\n- Lunch at Henry Koch (my share): $3.20\n- Hotel room: $18.90\n- Cab fare to hotel from Wash airport: $4.25\n- Tips at airport + Hotel: $1.00\n- Drink at Spanish Consulate attache: $4.30\n- Cab fare: $1.40\n- Long distance call to NY office: $8.23\n\n**June 21**\n- Breakfast: $1.20\n- Lunch at Cong. Hotel (my share): $6.68\n- Phone calls: $1.00\n- Valet service + tip: $1.25\n- Cab to Wash airport + tip: $4.25\n- Tips at hotel + Wash airport: $1.00\n- NY airport to home + tip: $23.83\n\nTotal: $42.23\n| Description                                      | Amount   |\n|--------------------------------------------------|----------|\n| Totals for trip to Spain                         | $1092.01 |\n| Totals for trip to Washington                    | $66.06   |\n| Credit card charges for Spain                    | $455.58  |\n| Credit card charges for Washington               | $26.61   |\n| Credit card charges for Spain                    | $482.49  |\n| Paid out in cash                                 | $675.58  |\n| Total to be accounted for                        | $1200.00 |\n| Total cash payments                              | $675.58  |\n| Due ICAP Corp                                    | $524.42  |\n\n**Addendum**\n\n- Airfare\n  - Plane fare to Spain, paid by ICAP: $526.30\n  - Plane fare to Wash. (Credit card ICAP): $33.00\n  - Total: $559.30\n1158.07\n557.30\n1717.37\n164.60\n123.54\n1945.51\n286.00\n1659.51\nTo be credited to\n\n9. met. 200.62\n53.60\n31.20\n126.00\n\n30 June. Balance column debit\n3. 4108.54\n2750.60\nWH returned\n1658.54\n526.30\n132.24\nTo balance 20.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10174-10069.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 154, "total-input-tokens": 180832, "total-output-tokens": 51186, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 588, 1], [588, 1066, 2], [1066, 1462, 3], [1462, 2155, 4], [2155, 2719, 5], [2719, 3944, 6], [3944, 5202, 7], [5202, 5991, 8], [5991, 6171, 9], [6171, 6877, 10], [6877, 8394, 11], [8394, 8964, 12], [8964, 10043, 13], [10043, 11103, 14], [11103, 11934, 15], [11934, 15655, 16], [15655, 16032, 17], [16032, 17595, 18], [17595, 17750, 19], [17750, 19392, 20], [19392, 21991, 21], [21991, 23603, 22], [23603, 25250, 23], [25250, 25503, 24], [25503, 25503, 25], [25503, 26815, 26], [26815, 26983, 27], [26983, 27212, 28], [27212, 28742, 29], [28742, 29710, 30], [29710, 30853, 31], [30853, 32005, 32], [32005, 33181, 33], [33181, 33719, 34], [33719, 34257, 35], [34257, 34323, 36], [34323, 34646, 37], [34646, 35439, 38], [35439, 36465, 39], [36465, 37561, 40], [37561, 39189, 41], [39189, 40768, 42], [40768, 40923, 43], [40923, 41664, 44], [41664, 43403, 45], [43403, 43998, 46], [43998, 44682, 47], [44682, 45585, 48], [45585, 46959, 49], [46959, 47580, 50], [47580, 47827, 51], [47827, 49664, 52], [49664, 51762, 53], [51762, 53607, 54], [53607, 53801, 55], [53801, 55412, 56], [55412, 57450, 57], [57450, 59709, 58], [59709, 62338, 59], [62338, 62956, 60], [62956, 64726, 61], [64726, 66612, 62], [66612, 68155, 63], [68155, 70215, 64], [70215, 74029, 65], [74029, 74826, 66], [74826, 74963, 67], [74963, 76179, 68], [76179, 76951, 69], [76951, 77232, 70], [77232, 78920, 71], [78920, 80131, 72], [80131, 81667, 73], [81667, 82234, 74], [82234, 83649, 75], [83649, 84745, 76], [84745, 86383, 77], [86383, 86614, 78], [86614, 89897, 79], [89897, 91223, 80], [91223, 92088, 81], [92088, 93316, 82], [93316, 94008, 83], [94008, 94786, 84], [94786, 95329, 85], [95329, 96296, 86], [96296, 97185, 87], [97185, 98443, 88], [98443, 100995, 89], [100995, 102290, 90], [102290, 102995, 91], [102995, 104125, 92], [104125, 104125, 93], [104125, 105765, 94], [105765, 105765, 95], [105765, 105765, 96], [105765, 105765, 97], [105765, 105765, 98], [105765, 105778, 99], [105778, 106185, 100], [106185, 106801, 101], [106801, 107354, 102], [107354, 108415, 103], [108415, 108415, 104], [108415, 108892, 105], [108892, 109982, 106], [109982, 111243, 107], [111243, 112439, 108], [112439, 113739, 109], [113739, 114675, 110], [114675, 116088, 111], [116088, 117647, 112], [117647, 119156, 113], [119156, 120216, 114], [120216, 121440, 115], [121440, 122431, 116], [122431, 123409, 117], [123409, 124700, 118], [124700, 125934, 119], [125934, 126783, 120], [126783, 127665, 121], [127665, 128112, 122], [128112, 129579, 123], [129579, 135118, 124], [135118, 135512, 125], [135512, 136357, 126], [136357, 137225, 127], [137225, 141794, 128], [141794, 141794, 129], [141794, 143204, 130], [143204, 144719, 131], [144719, 145265, 132], [145265, 146636, 133], [146636, 147210, 134], [147210, 149035, 135], [149035, 149035, 136], [149035, 149035, 137], [149035, 150238, 138], [150238, 150305, 139], [150305, 151275, 140], [151275, 152656, 141], [152656, 154124, 142], [154124, 155515, 143], [155515, 156621, 144], [156621, 157744, 145], [157744, 159074, 146], [159074, 160331, 147], [160331, 161940, 148], [161940, 163349, 149], [163349, 164777, 150], [164777, 166425, 151], [166425, 166995, 152], [166995, 167841, 153], [167841, 168052, 154]]}}