{"id": "975e5a6a0891cc71a04e4d7dedf6cd334f7a9a88", "text": "| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|\n| 416-54-2948| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | STAFF COUNSEL | 32,000.00 | 2,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |\n| 390-44-4227| BAETZ, CONRAD E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 046-36-4592| BEESON, PETER G | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 327-46-4790| BERLOW, LISA M | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 579-46-4548| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |\n| 243-74-5787| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 243-48-4536| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR| 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-01-77 |\n| 556-78-1139| BRADY, SURELL | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 466.67 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |\n| 237-90-5178| BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | STAFF ASSISTANT | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 098-20-3182| BROWN, WILLIAM | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 438-48-7116| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 414-98-4025| BURFORD, JUDITH R | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 086-46-9506| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | CLERICAL ASSISTANT | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 438-86-9756| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 263-08-0234| COOPER, CYNTHIA SUE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 933.33 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |\n| 462-88-1832| COPELAND, EILEEN | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 460-74-1179| CORNWELL, GARY T | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 579-40-4377| CROSS, WILLIAM H | ASST TO DIR OF SECURITY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 220-36-0563| CULLINGS, JEROME A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 132-14-2717| DALY, MARTIN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 229-26-8374| DAY, CLARENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 436-62-4154| DELSA, LAWRENCE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 578-32-6132| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 14,500.00 | 1,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |\n| 324-40-6284| EBERHARDT, MICHAEL C | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |\n| 242-28-3222| ECCLES, FRANK L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|\n| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL, CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 129-22-1805 | EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 341-44-6951 | FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 082-22-5909 | FENTON, CLIFFORD A JR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN, T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 136-28-8924 | FONZI, GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 272-42-7056 | GAY, DONOVAN L | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN, ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO, DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY, JANE E | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 058-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 579-22-9353 | HACK, ALFRED S | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 251-86-1541 | HAMILTON, ALFRED P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY, DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 129-36-7823 | HAUSMAN, ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 220-48-5696 | HESS, JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE, LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 559-28-5038 | HOLT, LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK, JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH, THOMAS | STAFF COUNSEL | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON, E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 128-20-8996 | ISRAEL, MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON, MARGO E | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| DOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | APPOINTMENT | REMARKS |\n|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|-------------|---------|\n| 223-38-6743 | JOHNSON, ERNESTINE G | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | ASST DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | SECRETARY | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | RECEPTIONIST | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOLORETH W | RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 071-28-5111 | LEHNER, ROBERT J | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 042-52-4602 | LICHTENFELS, BETH ANNE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-11-77|\n| 534-50-0480 | LINDLEY, ROBIN D | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 541.67 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-18-77|\n| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 013-34-3361 | MATTHEWS, ISIAH C | SPECIAL COUNSEL | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77|\n| 526-74-9097 | MATTHEWS, LEODIS C | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-11-77|\n| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 024-24-7568 | MILLER, DONNE B | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|\n| 579-24-3862 | MORTARITY, JOHN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 403-36-7980 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A, JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN, III | DOCUMENTS CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | LAW ASSISTANT | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 235-94-3124 | SMITH, BEVERLY | CLERK TYPIST | 11,500.00 | 31.94 | 10-30-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |\n| 528-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 023-36-0715 | SPEISER, MARK A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 77.78 | 10-30-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |\n| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 264-98-4680 | SVENSON, LANCE W | XEROX MESSANGER | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|------|--------|--------------------------|\n| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER, OLIVE E | RECEPTIONIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 260-40-7319 | WALKER, ROBERT J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 087-26-0521 | WAXMAN, MEL | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 049-34-8893 | WEBB, WILLIAM A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,177.78 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |\n| 247-78-3852 | WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | STAFF ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 169-28-6880 | WILLS, MARION H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 171-38-3757 | WIZELMAN, LESLIE H | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 383-52-5221 | WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 057-40-6887 | WOLF, JAMES LERER | STAFF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 113-18-5784 | WRASE, RICHARD C | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 400.00 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| EMPLOYEES NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES USED | SALARY PROJECTION USED |\n|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------|\n| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |\n| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |\n| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |\n| INVESTIGATIVE | 111 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |\n| GRAND TOTAL | 111 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n**U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES** \n**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM** \n**Assassinations** \n**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION** \n**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 8/1/77 TO 8/31/77**\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| Robert K. Tanenbaum | 127-32-4970 | | $36,000.00 | $300.00 | 8/1/77 8/3/77 | Employee terminated 8/3/77 |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 1 | | | $300.00 | | |\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\n/5/\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10095.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 6, "total-input-tokens": 6858, "total-output-tokens": 9782, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 4455, 1], [4455, 8093, 2], [8093, 12277, 3], [12277, 15238, 4], [15238, 18397, 5], [18397, 19754, 6]]}} {"id": "e5f0a87784783fcd9a0887866c75989fbb265f50", "text": "| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD FROM | TO | P/R CHANGE | REMARKS |\n|-------------|--------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|------|-------------|------|-------------|---------|\n| 416-54-2948 | AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 32,000.00 | 2,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |\n| 390-44-4227 | BAETZ, CONRAD E | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 046-36-4592 | BEESON, PETER G | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 327-46-4790 | BERLOW, LISA M | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 579-46-4548 | BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |\n| 243-74-5787 | BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 243-48-4536 | BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 07-01-77 |\n| 556-78-1139 | BRADY, SURELL | 28,000.00 | 466.67 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-25-77 |\n| 237-90-5178 | BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 098-20-3182 | BROWN, WILLIAM | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 438-48-7116 | BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 414-98-4025 | BURFORD, JUDITH R | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 066-46-9506 | CHAMPION, OLIVER J | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 438-86-9756 | CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 263-08-0234 | COOPER, CYNTHIA SUE | 12,000.00 | 933.33 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-03-77 |\n| 462-68-1832 | COPELAND, EILEEN | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 460-74-1179 | CORNWELL, GARY T | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 579-40-4377 | CROSS, WILLIAM H | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 220-36-0563 | CULLINGS, JEROME A | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 132-14-2717 | DALY, MARTIN J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 229-26-6374 | DAY, CLARENCE J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 436-62-4154 | DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| 578-32-6132 | EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 14,500.00 | 1,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |\n| 324-40-6284 | EBERMARDT, MICHAEL C | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |\n| 242-28-3222 | ECCLES, FRANK L | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|\n| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL.CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 129-22-1805 | EVANS.EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 341-44-6951 | FACTER.JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 082-22-5909 | FENTON.CLIFFORD A.UR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN.T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 136-28-8924 | FONZI.GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 272-42-7056 | GAY.DONOVAN L. | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN.ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO.DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY.JANE E | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 058-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH.MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES.ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES.MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 579-22-9353 | HACK.ALFRED S | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 251-68-1541 | HAMILTON.GERALD P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY.DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 129-38-7823 | HAUSMAN.ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 220-48-5696 | HESS.JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE.LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 559-28-5038 | HOLT.LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK.JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH.THOMAS | BUDGET OFFICER | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON.E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 128-20-8996 | ISRAEL.MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON.MARGO E | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | APPOINTMENT | REMARKS |\n|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|----|--------|-------------|---------|\n| 223-38-6743 | JOHNSON, ERNESTINE G | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 09-06-77 |\n| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | ASST DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | SECRETARY | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | RECEPTIONIST | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOLOTHY W | RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L III | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 071-28-5111 | LEHNER, ROBERT J | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 042-52-4602 | LICHTENFELS, BETH ANNE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-11-77 |\n| 534-50-0480 | LINDELL, ROBIN D | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 541.67 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-18-77 |\n| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 013-34-3361 | MATHEWS, ISAIAH C | SPECIAL COUNSEL | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |\n| 526-74-9097 | MATTHEWS, LEODIS C | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-11-77 |\n| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L | EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| 132-24-7659 | MISITA, ANNE B | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|----|--------|---------|\n| 579-24-3862 | MORTIARY, JOHN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 403-36-7980 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN III | DOCUMENTS CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | LAW ASSISTANT | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 235-94-3124 | SMITH, BEVERLY | CLERK TYPIST | 11,500.00 | 31.94 | 10-30-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |\n| 526-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 023-36-0715 | SPEISER, MARK A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 77.78 | 10-30-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |\n| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 264-98-4680 | SVENDSEN, LANCE W | XEROX/MESSANGER | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT.WILLIAM K | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER.OLIVE E | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 260-40-7319 | WALKER.ROBERT J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 087-26-0521 | WAXMAN.MEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 049-34-8893 | WEBB.WILLIAM A | 28,000.00 | 2,177.78 | 10-03-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |\n| 247-78-3852 | WILANDER.ANNE PAUL | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 169-28-6880 | WILLS.MARION H | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 171-38-3757 | WIZELMAN.LESLIE H | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 383-52-5221 | WOLF.ELIZABETH ANN | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 057-40-6887 | WOLF.JAMES LERER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |\n| 113-18-5784 | WRASE.RICHARD C | 24,000.00 | 400.00 | 10-25-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| EMPLOYEES | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES | SALARY PROJECTION |\n|-----------|---------------------------------|-------------------|\n| NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | USED | USED |\n| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |\n| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |\n| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |\n| INVESTIGATIVE | 111 | 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |\n| GRAND TOTAL | 111 | 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON\n\nAllowed\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 1 | | | $300.00 | | |\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Committee.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10096.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 6, "total-input-tokens": 6858, "total-output-tokens": 10046, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 3907, 1], [3907, 7444, 2], [7444, 10862, 3], [10862, 13649, 4], [13649, 15921, 5], [15921, 16700, 6]]}} {"id": "49eb33d8ec0e3a0f57b676eff8ba02eededfe325", "text": "**U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES** \n**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM**\n\n**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION**\n\n**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 9/1/77 TO 9/30/77**\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| Alfred S. Hack | 579-22-9353 | | $24,000 | 1,666.67 | 9/6/77 9/30/77 | New employee |\n| Staff Investigator | | | | | | |\n| Ernestine G. Johnson | 223-38-6743 | | $24,000 | 1,666.67 | 9/6/77 9/30/77 | New employee |\n| Staff Investigator | | | | | | |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 2 | | | $3,333.34 | | |\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| 416-54-2948| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | STAFF COUNSEL | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 390-44-4227| BAETZ, CONRAD E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 046-36-4592| BEESON, PETER G | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 327-46-4790| BERLOW, LISA M | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 579-46-4548| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 243-74-5787| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 243-48-4536| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 215-52-9164| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 666.67 | 09-01-77 09-16-77 | TERMINATED 09-16-77 |\n| 258-72-6151| BROWN, CLAIRE L | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 833.33 | 09-01-77 09-20-77 | TERMINATED 09-20-77 |\n| 237-90-5178| BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | STAFF ASSISTANT | 13,000.00 | 144.44 | 09-27-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-27-77 |\n| 098-20-3182| BROWN, WILLIAM | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 438-48-7116| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 414-98-4025| BURFORD, JUDITH R | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 086-46-9506| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | CLERICAL ASSISTANT | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 438-86-9756| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 462-88-1832| COPELAND, EILEEN | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 460-74-1179| CORNWELL, GARY T | RESEARCHER | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-01-77 |\n| 579-40-4377| CROSS, WILLIAM H | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 220-36-0563| CULLINGS, JEROME A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 1,466.67 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |\n| 132-14-2717| DALY, MARTIN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 229-26-8374| DAY, CLARENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 436-62-4154| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 578-32-6132| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 324-40-6284| EBERHARDT, MICHAEL C | SECRETARY | 32,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 09-19-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-19-77 |\n| 242-28-3222| ECCLES, FRANK L | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------|---------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|\n| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL, CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 129-22-1805 | EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 341-44-6951 | FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 132-34-5625 | FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 1,200.00 | 09-01-77 09-12-77 | TERMINATED 09-12-77 |\n| 231-86-6887 | FARMER, JOHN J, JR | CLERK | 7,200.00 | 0.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | TERMINATED 08-31-77 |\n| 082-22-5909 | FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN, T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 136-28-8924 | FONZI, GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 272-42-7056 | GAY, DONOVAN L | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN, ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO, DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |\n| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY, JANE E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 059-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 251-88-1541 | HAMILTON, GERALD P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY, DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 129-38-7823 | HAUSMAN, ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 220-48-5696 | HESS, JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE, LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 559-28-5038 | HOLT, LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK, JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 1,133.33 | 09-19-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-19-77 |\n| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH, THOMAS | BUDGET OFFICER | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON, E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 128-20-6996 | ISRAEL, MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|\n| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON, MARGO E | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOROTHY W | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L, III| 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 071-28-5111 | LERNER, ROBERT J | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | 18,000.00 | 1,150.00 | 09-08-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-08-77 |\n| 518-56-7099 | MARTIN, REBECCA W | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 013-34-3361 | MATHews, ISIAH C | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | 21,500.00 | 955.56 | 09-15-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-15-77 |\n| 132-24-7659 | MISITA, ANNE B | 12,000.00 | 833.33 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |\n| 102-30-2631 | MORDANA, SARI | 19,500.00 | 812.50 | 09-01-77 09-15-77 | TERMINATED 09-15-77 |\n| 579-24-3862 | MORTARY, JOHN J | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|\n| 403-36-7960 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |\n| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 578-80-2773 | RUDDER, MIRIAM | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 528-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 264-98-4680 | SVENDSEN, LANCE W | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | 24,000.00 | 1,466.67 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |\n| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER, OLIVE E | 11,000.00 | 672.22 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |\n| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| 260-40-7319| WALKER, ROBERT J | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |\n| 020-36-4147| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER| 15,000.00 | 666.67 | 09-01-77 09-16-77 | TERMINATED 09-16-77 |\n| 087-26-0521| WAXMAN, MEL STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 247-78-3852| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL STAFF ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 169-28-6880| WILLS, MARION H SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 171-38-3757| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 383-52-5221| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n| 057-40-6887| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| EMPLOYEES NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES | SALARY PROJECTION USED |\n|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------|\n| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |\n| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |\n| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |\n| INVESTIGATIVE | 107 102 | 174,859.76 | 178,583.36 |\n| GRAND TOTAL | 107 102 | 174,859.76 | 178,583.36 |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10097.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 6, "total-input-tokens": 6858, "total-output-tokens": 9005, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 1747, 1], [1747, 5813, 2], [5813, 8770, 3], [8770, 11675, 4], [11675, 14569, 5], [14569, 16818, 6]]}} {"id": "4a6e8743bed6884b14d8a00a92a659da12495188", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BAETZ, CONRAD E | 390-44-4227 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| BEESON, PETER G | 046-36-4592 | 28,000.00 | 1,788.89 | 08-08-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-08-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| BROWN, WILLIAM | 098-20-3182 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | 438-48-7116 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |\n| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | 086-46-9506 | 9,500.00 | 343.06 | 08-18-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-18-77 |\n| CLERICAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-0264 | 34,000.00 | 0.00 | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| CROSS, WILLIAM H | 579-40-4377 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |\n| ASST TO DIR OF SECURITY | | | | | |\n| DALY, MARTIN J | 132-14-2717 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 436-62-4154 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,500.00 | 422.22 | 08-01-77 08-16-77 | TERMINATED 08-16-77 |\n| CLERICAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| FARMER, JOHN J. JR | 231-86-6887 | 7,200.00 | 600.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| FLANAGAN, T MARK | 214-60-6734 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GAY, CONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| GENZMAN, ROBERT W | 299-50-7438 | 18,000.00 | 100.00 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | 058-44-6772 | 30,000.00 | 166.67 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| GONZALES, ALBERT | 082-14-2877 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GRANT, KENNETH G | 099-20-0966 | 24,000.00 | 1,533.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-23-77 | TERMINATED 08-23-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |\n| HARDWAY, DAN L | 263-17-0952 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MA | 559-28-5038 | 27,692.30 | 2,000.00 | 08-05-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-05-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | | |\n| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |\n| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | 12,000.00 | 994.45 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-02-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| ASSISTANT DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | 577-56-7465 | 13,000.00 | 72.22 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| KELLY, JAMES P | 103-18-7227 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 066-38-5091 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| KUHN, DOROTHY W | 371-32-3731 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |\n| RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | | | | | | | |\n| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | 579-58-9975 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LEMMER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 087-48-2165 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| MASON, M C | 237-56-8144 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| MATHews, ISIAH C | 013-34-3361 | 19,500.00 | 1,516.67 | 08-03-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-03-77 |\n| SPECIAL COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| MAXWELL, ALBERT | 109-20-5111 | 24,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-16-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-16-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|--------------------------|\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | TERMINATED 08-05-77 |\n| MORTON, CECILIA T | 578-66-0125 | 12,000.00 | 166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-05-77 | |\n| MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 177-42-4376 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| O'NEILL, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| SENIOR RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| O'NEILL, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A JR | 211-38-9707 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| REEVES, FLOYD L | 254-66-1801 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 0.00 | | | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| ADM SEC'TY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |\n| RUGGER, MIRIAM | 578-60-2773 | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| MAIL/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | 029-38-8530 | 19,500.00 | 325.00 | | 08-25-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-25-77 |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4088 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 531-50-7701 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| SISSON, BETTY LO | 245-56-4327 | 14,000.00 | 350.00 | | 08-22-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-22-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| SVENDSEN, LANCE W | 264-98-4680 | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |\n| XEROX/MESSANGER | | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 36,000.00 | 0.00 | | | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 08/01/77 TO 08/30/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | 550-50-7581 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| WAXMAN, MEL | 087-26-0521 | 24,000.00 | 533.33 | 08-23-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-23-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | 247-78-3852 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| STAFF ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H | 171-38-3757 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|\n| 95 | 0 | 541,564.36 | 150,904.20 | 390,660.16 | 162,324.37 | 228,335.79 | |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10098.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 5, "total-input-tokens": 5715, "total-output-tokens": 10191, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 2847, 1], [2847, 10132, 2], [10132, 13468, 3], [13468, 20116, 4], [20116, 23661, 5]]}} {"id": "720d3db9169512529cd52ddd11275b593047afea", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-01-77 |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 28,000.00 | 222.66 | 07-01-77 | 07-11-77 | TERMINATED 07-11-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 436-62-4154 | 24,000.00 | 1,733.33 | 07-05-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-05-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | | |\n| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | 10,850.00 | 904.17 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-17-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/01/77 TO 07/31/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|\n| FARMER, JOHN J. JR | 231-86-6887 | 7.200.00 | 410.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-20-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | |\n| FLANAGAN, T MARK | 214-60-6734 | 12.000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| FONZI, AETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GAY, DONOVAN L. | 272-42-7056 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14.000.00 | 1.166.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| GONZALES, ALBERT | 082-14-2877 | 24.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GRANT, KENNETH G | 099-20-0966 | 24.000.00 | 200.00 | 07-28-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-28-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 21.000.00 | 1.750.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-01-77 |\n| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |\n| HARDWAY, DAN L | 263-17-0952 | 12.000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | 28.000.00 | 2.333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 13.000.00 | 1.083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 20.000.00 | 1.666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1366 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | |\n| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 36.000.00 | 3.511.11 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-17-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | |\n| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 32.000.00 | 2.666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | |\n| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | 12.000.00 | 1.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| KELLY, JAMES P | 103-18-7227 | 24.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 16.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-39-5091 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | 579-58-9975 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 23,000.00 | 1,916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-17-77 07-16-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-17-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 087-48-2165 | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | |\n| MASON, M C | 237-56-8144 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| MORTON, JOHN J | 579-24-3662 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 20,000.00 | 1,555.55 | 07-11-77 07-10-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-11-77 |\n| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | |\n| MORTON, LECIELA T | 578-66-0125 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 177-42-4376 | 12,000.00 | 866.67 | 07-05-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-05-77 |\n| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | |\n| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 209-46-4088 | | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | | | | | | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 531-50-7701 | | 16,000.00 | 888.89 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | 127-32-4970 | | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 07-17-77 |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | 036-34-9187 | | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | | | | | | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD RESEARCHER| | | | | | |\n| TRIPPLET, WILLIAM K | 550-50-7581 | | 30,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-17-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-17-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 247-78-3852 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL STAFF ASSISTANT | 169-28-6880 | | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| WILLS, MARION H SECRETARY | 171-38-3757 | | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |\n| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 2,416.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/01/77 TO 07/31/77\n\nOFFICE: B3000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 83 | 0 | 415,238.84 | 126,325.71 | 288,913.13 | 131,004.16 | 157,908.97 | |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\n[Signature]\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10100.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 5, "total-input-tokens": 5715, "total-output-tokens": 7833, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 6425, 1], [6425, 9621, 2], [9621, 12602, 3], [12602, 15848, 4], [15848, 16886, 5]]}} {"id": "5156a5f3c75e1636c2428d920978aa7e532801d8", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | | 12,000.00 | 300.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | | 27,000.00 | 1,050.00 | 06-17-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-17-77 |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | | 10,000.00 | 250.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | | 34,000.00 | 3,770.83 | 06-26-77 | 06-25-77 |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | P/R CHANGE - 06-26-77 |\n| CHENGWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | | 28,000.00 | 607.25 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |\n| CONZELIAN, JAMES K | 436-86-9756 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-08-1832 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 06-27-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-27-77 |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | | |\n| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | | 13,500.00 | 600.00 | 06-15-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-15-77 |\n| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | | 24,000.00 | 1,533.33 | 06-08-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-08-77 |\n| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | | 10,850.00 | 904.17 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| FARMER, JOHN J, JR | 231-86-6687 | | 3,600.00 | 230.00 | 06-08-77 | 06-30-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-08-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | CROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-29-8924 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M. SJ | 180-30-1309 | | 20,000.00 | 944.44 | 06-01-77 | 06-17-77 | TERMINATED 06-17-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| GAY, DONOVAN L. | 272-42-7056 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | | 30,000.00 | 666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-08-77 | TERMINATED 06-08-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN RESEARCHER | 212-56-6718 | | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | | 11,300.00 | 941.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |\n| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |\n| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS M | 219-58-7593 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | | 20,000.00 | 388.89 | 06-01-77 | 06-07-77 | TERMINATED 06-07-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | | |\n| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |\n| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 06-27-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-27-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | | 32,000.00 | 3,097.22 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | P/R CHANGE--06-11-77 |\n| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | | |\n| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | | 12,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-06-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-06-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A SECRETARY | 161-39-7640 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-39-5091 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LARRIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| LAWSON III, BELFORD L STAFF COUNSEL | 579-58-9975 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|------------------|\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | | 23,000.00 | 1,916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | | 47,500.00 | 3,952.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | | 47,500.00 | 0.00 | | | TERMINATED 05-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| MASON, M. C | 237-56-8144 | | 12,000.00 | 300.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |\n| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORRANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | | |\n| MORTON, CECELIA T | 578-66-0125 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | | 18,000.00 | 450.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |\n| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2391 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 0.00 | | | TERMINATED 05-31-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | | 10,000.00 | 500.00 | 06-13-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-13-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | P/R CHANGE--06-01-77 |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4068 | | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 06/01/77 TO 06/30/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | 247-78-3652 | 13,000.00 | 650.00 | 06-13-77 06-30-77 APPOINTMENT 06-13-77 |\n| STAFF ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 29,000.00 | 2,416.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | 22,000.00 | 1,038.89 | 06-01-77 06-17-77 TERMINATED 06-17-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | | | | | |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | ALLOWANCE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED | NEXT MONTH | UNUSED | PROJECTION |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------|-------------------------|--------|------------|--------|------------|\n| 73 | 0 | 308,498.97 | | 111,090.02 | 197,408.95 | 118,104.15 | 79,304.80 |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10101.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 4, "total-input-tokens": 4572, "total-output-tokens": 8273, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 6428, 1], [6428, 12832, 2], [12832, 20056, 3], [20056, 23471, 4]]}} {"id": "7054f0392a26d00d4bd057a649d604a38fd46f26", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY FROM TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|------------------|--------|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 14.000.00 | 583.33 | 05-01-77 05-15-77 | TERMINATED 05-15-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| DERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 16.000.00 | 1,333.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 18.000.00 | 1,500.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15.000.00 | 1,250.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 28.000.00 | 661.42 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-02-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 11.000.00 | 458.33 | 05-16-77 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-16-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9.000.00 | 750.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-29-77 05-28-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25.000.00 | 2,583.34 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-09-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 47.500.00 | 1,451.39 | 05-01-77 05-11-77 | TERMINATED 05-11-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-29-77 05-28-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14.000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 05/01/77 TO 05/31/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY FROM TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-------------------|--------|---------|\n| GRIMES.MARY SUSAN RESEARCHER | 212-56-6718 | 21 000 | 1.750 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| HAMILTON.GERALD P DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 251-88-1541 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-06-77 05-06-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-06-77 |\n| HESS.JACQUELINE DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 220-48-5696 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-06-77 05-06-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-06-77 |\n| HINDLE.LOUIS H CLERK | 919-58-7593 | 13 000 | 1.083 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| HITCHCOCK.CORNISH F STAFF COUNSEL | 042-40-0959 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| HOLT.LAURA MAE STAFF COUNSEL | 559-28-5038 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| HOWARTH.THOMAS BUDGET OFFICER | 015-18-1386 | 30 000 | 3.861 11 | 05-09-77 05-28-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-29-77 |\n| HUTTON.E MCK DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 226-10-4799 | 47 500 | 3.958 43 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| JOHNSON.GENE R ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 371-40-1135 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| KILKER.ELIZABETH A SECRETARY | 161-38-7640 | 16 000 | 1.333 23 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| KLEIN.KENNETH D STAFF COUNSEL | 068-38-5091 | 30 000 | 3.861 11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| LARKIN.JOYCE ANN SECRETARY | 233-92-1962 | 14 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| LAWSON III.BELFORD L STAFF COUNSEL | 579-58-9975 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| LEE.SHEILA JACKSON STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 093-42-2090 | 23 000 | 2.052 78 | 05-03-77 05-02-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-03-77 |\n| LEHNER.ROBERT J DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 071-29-5111 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| LEWIS.ALVIN B.JR STAFF COUNSEL | 205-26-3636 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| LOCKE.RALPH C RESEARCHER | 017-36-1972 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MARTIN.REBECCA W CHIEF CLERK | 518-56-7099 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MCCRAY.DENISE LOUISE SECRETARY | 577-72-8453 | 12 000 | 500 00 | 05-01-77 05-15-77 | TFRMINATED | 05-15-77 |\n| MCPHERSON.VIVIAN L EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 240-66-7674 | 16 000 | 1.333 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MORDANA.SARI LAW ASSISTANT | 102-30-2631 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MORIARTY.JOHN J STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | 579-24-3862 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MORRISON.ROBERT C SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | 403-36-7980 | 16 000 | 1.333 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |\n| MORTON.RITA L SECRETARY | 579-64-6855 | 26 000 | 00 00 | 00 00 | TERMINATED | 04-30-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | 219-64-3205 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-88-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 16,200.00 | 1,170.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-05-77 |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4439 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4088 | | 12,000.00 | 266.67 | 05-23-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-23-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 25,000.00 | 1,819.45 | 05-01-77 | 05-19-77 | TERMINATED 05-19-77 |\n| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | | 13,500.00 | 1,041.67 | 05-02-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-02-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 3,598.61 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-24-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10102.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 3, "total-input-tokens": 3429, "total-output-tokens": 6246, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 2904, 1], [2904, 6629, 2], [6629, 12525, 3]]}} {"id": "dd59c635a8d2d30242b3b4ee2938367461a76d3c", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 33,600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S. JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 38,200.00 | 3,183.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 47,500.00 | 2,232.25 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | | |\n| MESSANGER | | | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M. SJ | 180-30-1309 | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-12-7056 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 44,600.00 | 3,716.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 04/01/77 TO 04/30/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | |\n| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | |\n| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE P | 371-40-1135 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | |\n| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | 18.450.00 | 0.00 | | TERMINATED 03-31-77 |\n| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 26.000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| LAWSON III, BELFORD L | 579-58-9975 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | 47.500.00 | 1,451.39 | 04-01-77 04-11-77 | TERMINATED 04-11-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | |\n| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 18.000.00 | 1,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY POSITION NO. AND TITLE | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|---------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| O'ROURKE, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | 33,600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| O'ROURKE, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | CLERK | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | STAFF COUNSEL | | 38,200.00 | 3,103.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-58-2917 | DOCUMENT CLERK | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | RESEARCHER | | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 570-80-2773 | CLERK | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | DOCUMENT CLERK | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |\n| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | 24,354.00 | 0.00 | TERMINATED 03-31-77 | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | RESEARCHER | | 36,100.00 | 3,008.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | RESEARCHER | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | 46,700.00 | 3,891.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10103.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 3, "total-input-tokens": 3429, "total-output-tokens": 6183, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 3144, 1], [3144, 6575, 2], [6575, 10210, 3]]}} {"id": "4e34d6e2fb337df158c08a1d4875f43eb619aa56", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| BAISH, EDYTH | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 246.00 | 03-01-77 03-08-77 TERMINATED 03-08-77 | |\n| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-62-4715 | 10,000.00 | 111.11 | 03-01-77 03-04-77 TERMINATED 03-04-77 | |\n| BOSTON, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 464.67 | 03-01-77 03-08-77 TERMINATED 03-08-77 | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 21,913.00 | 100.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 P/R CHANGE -03-01-77 | |\n| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 683.33 | 03-01-77 03-20-77 TERMINATED 03-20-77 | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| FEELEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M, JR | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY POSITION NO. AND TITLE | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|---------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|\n| GAY, DOHOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | STAFF COUNSEL | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GODFREY, JAMIE E | 119-36-4041 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GRINES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | RESEARCHER | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | CLERK | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | STAFF COUNSEL | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | BUDGET OFFICER | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HUTTON, MCK | 226-10-4799 | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| JENKINS, NANCY S | 216-40-9950 | SECRETARY | 10,332.00 | 114.80 | 03-01-77 | 03-04-77 | TERMINATED | 03-04-77 |\n| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | STAFF COUNSEL | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LARRIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | STAFF COUNSEL | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 529-60-6414 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 165.67 | 03-01-77 | 03-06-77 | TERMINATED | 03-06-77 |\n| LAWSON, BELFORD L.III | 579-58-9975 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LEWIS, ALVIN B.JR | 205-26-3636 | STAFF COUNSEL | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | RESEARCHER | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | |\n| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3662 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | |\n| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECT | | | | | | |\n| DRR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECT | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 10,455.00 | 871.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| TINAJERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6905 | | 11,070.00 | 215.25 | 03-01-77 03-07-77 TERMINATED 03-07-77 | |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 03/01/77 TO 03/31/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | PAY SALARY | PAY GROSS | PAY FROM | PAY TO | REMARKS |\n|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|------------|-----------|----------|--------|---------|\n| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER| 020-36-4147 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | 17.835.00 | 1.466.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | 415-84-5593 | 13.530.00 | 1.127.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH UNUSED | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 66 | 0 | 66,545.20 | 74,994.58 | -8,449.38 | 74,718.83 | -83,168.21 | |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10104.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 4, "total-input-tokens": 4276, "total-output-tokens": 6482, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 2018, 1], [2018, 5778, 2], [5778, 12621, 3], [12621, 14438, 4]]}} {"id": "f795b04483e1ff936660c112ec28545062fcfb8c", "text": "ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 to 02/28/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BAISH, EDYTH | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |\n| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BROOKS, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| CHARDON, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 20,964.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 436-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-5826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | 549-48-4370 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 212-56-6718 | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 251-88-1541 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| SECRETARY | 220-48-5696 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| RESEARCHER | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 559-28-5038 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 015-18-1386 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 226-10-4799 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 216-40-9950 | 10,332.00 | 861.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 371-40-1135 | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| CLERK | 082-24-2085 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 161-38-7640 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 068-38-5091 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 529-60-6414 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 579-58-9975 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| SECRETARY | 149-38-9108 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 093-42-2090 | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 071-28-5111 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 205-26-3636 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| MORDANA, SARAH | 102-30-2631 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| MORTIARY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | |\n| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | |\n| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |\n| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 10,459.00 | 871.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | 15,375.00 | 1,261.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |\n| TINADERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6505 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 to 02/28/77\n\nOFFICE: B3000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 020-36-4147 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | 17,835.00 | 1,486.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | 415-84-5593 | 13,530.00 | 1,127.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 73 | 0 | 66,545.20 | 80,053.83 | 81,779.91 | 80,132.91 | 80,132.91 |\n\nCERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR DESIGNATED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269642 Page 4", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10105.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 4, "total-input-tokens": 4276, "total-output-tokens": 6091, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 2627, 1], [2627, 5835, 2], [5835, 8670, 3], [8670, 10326, 4]]}} {"id": "9b56cb03ea23d1fada8dc6ce27e49d8859267830", "text": "FEB. PAID IN MARCH\n\nDATE: 3/11/77\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|\n| Risinger, Marlin, III | 438-68-2917 | | $10,000.00 | $833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |\n\nDocuments Clerk\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 1 | | | $833.33 | | |\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\nFebruary paid in March\n\nDATE: March 8, 1977\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. On Assassinations\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|\n| Akers, Jeremy Ray | 416-54-2984 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Baish, Edyth | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Berning, Elizabeth | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |\n| Blackmer, Jon | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | | |\n| Brooten, Ken | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |\n| Chardak, Burton | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |\n| Connor, Linda | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |\n| Evans, Ed | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |\n| Facter, Jeff | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | | |\n| Fallis, Stephen | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |\n| Feeney, Rick | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |\n| Fenton, Clifford | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |\n| Fonzi, Gaeton | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |\n| Gannon, Thomas | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |\nFebruary paid in March\n\nDATE: March 8, 1977\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|\n| Gay, Donovan | 272-42-7056 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 | |\n| Gilbert, Howard | 549-48-4370 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |\n| Grimes, Mary | 212-56-6718 | | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | | | |\n| Hamilton, Gerald | 251-88-1541 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | | |\n| Hess, Jackie | 220-48-5696 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | | |\n| Holt, Laura | 559-28-5038 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | | |\n| Howarth, Thomas | 015-18-1386 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |\n| Hutton, E Mck | 226-10-4799 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | | |\n| Jenkins, Nancy | 216-40-9950 | | 10,332.00 | 861.00 | | | |\n| Johnson, Gene | 371-40-1135 | | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | | | |\n| Kelly, Francis | 082-24-2085 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |\n| Kiker, Elizabeth | 161-38-7640 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | | |\n| Klein, Kenneth | 068-38-5091 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |\n| Larson, Billie | 529-60-6414 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | | |\n| Lawson, Belford | 579-58-9975 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | | |\nFebruary paid in March.\n\nDATE: March 8, 1977\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|\n| Lazin, Terry | 149-38-9108 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Lee, Sheila | 093-42-2090 | | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | | |\n| Lehner, Robert | 071-28-5111 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |\n| Lewis, Alvin | 205-26-3636 | | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |\n| Martin, Rebecca | 518-56-7099 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |\n| McPherson, Vivian | 240-66-7674 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |\n| Moriarty, John | 579-24-3862 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | |\n| Morrison, Robert | 403-36-7980 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |\n| Orr, Patricia | 215-66-2714 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |\n| Purdy, Donald A. Jr.| 211-38-9707 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | | |\n| Ross, Ida Jane | 227-28-5345 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |\n| Sprague, Richard A. | 402-30-6486 | | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | | |\n| Tanenbaum, Robert K.| 127-32-4970 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |\n| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 036-34-9187 | | 10,455.00 | 871.25 | | |\n| Thornell, Joan Talbert | 579-54-1505 | | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | | |\nFEVERUARY PAID IN MARCH\n\nDATE: 3-8-77\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|\n| Tinajero, Dorothy R.| 427-54-6905 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Wolf, James Lerner | 057-40-6887 | | 17,835.00 | 1,486.25 | | |\n| Zevnik, Paul A. | 415-84-5593 | | 13,530.00 | 1,127.50 | | |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O AMT AVAILABLE PAY THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| CLERK HIRE CHARGES | 47 | | $59,857.98 | |\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\nFEbruary PAID IN MARCH\n\nDATE: 3-9-77\n\nU. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\nFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\n\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|\n| Boland, Colleen T. Researcher | 215-52-9164 | $10,000.00 | $833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |\n| Godfrey, Jane E. Secretary | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 2 | | | | | |\n\nCLERK HIRE CHARGES 2 $1,666.66\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\nFEBRUARY PAID IN MARCH\n\nDATE: 3/14/77\n\nU. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\nFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM\n\nOFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nOFFICE CODE: 83000\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|\n| Rosen, Merete Muff | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Researcher | | | | | | |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 1 | | | 833.33 | | |\n\nCLERK HIRE CHARGES: 1\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n**U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES** \n**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM**\n\n**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION**\n\n**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77**\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |\n|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|\n| Barrow, Giulia M. | 145-46-6759 | $10,000 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Secretary | | | | | | |\n| Strickland, Ann | 227-76-3525 | 10,000 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |\n| Secretary | | | | | | |\n\n**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| 2 | | | | | |\n\nCLERK HIRE CHARGES 1,666.66\n\nI certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND TITLE | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| AHERN, JAMES | STAFF COUNSEL | 446-54-2940 | 10,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BAUGH, EDITH | STAFF COUNSEL | 169-16-0421 | 11,700.00 | 925.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | BARRON, JULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 579-46-4548 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BLACKMER, S. JONATHAN | SECRETARY | 243-74-5287 | 11,700.00 | 925.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | STAFF COUNSEL | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BONIFER, SHERYL L | RESEARCHER | 228-82-4715 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BROOKE, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | SECRETARY | 519-42-7339 | 22,100.00 | 1,841.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | STAFF COUNSEL | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | RESEARCHER | 194-48-8264 | 22,100.00 | 1,841.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 081-12-1326 | 20,964.00 | 100.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CONNOR, LINDA M | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 231-58-8039 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 438-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | MESSENGER | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 129-22-1805 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 341-44-6951 | 16,250.00 | 1,354.17 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 132-34-5625 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | 243-46-6686 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| FONZI, GALEN | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 136-28-8824 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M. JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 180-30-1309 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 222-42-7056 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | 549-48-4370 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| GILSEAT-HOWARD M | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 212-56-6718 | 13,650.00 | 1,137.50 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 251-88-1541 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 220-48-5696 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| CLERK | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 559-28-5038 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | 226-10-4799 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 216-40-9950 | 10,920.00 | 910.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE P | 371-40-1135 | 20,800.00 | 1,733.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 082-24-2065 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 161-38-7640 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 068-38-5091 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 539-60-6414 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 529-56-9975 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 149-36-9108 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 093-42-2090 | 14,950.00 | 1,245.83 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 071-28-5111 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 205-26-3636 | 22,100.00 | 1,811.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| MARRAN, REBECCA W | 518-66-7099 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | |\n| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| MCMHORSON, VIVIAN L | 240-66-7674 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| MOLIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7880 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | |\n| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 315-66-2714 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| RUNDY, DONALD A JR | 211-38-9707 | 11,700.00 | 975.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, JANE | 227-16-5345 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 526-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |\n| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-36-6466 | 25,740.00 | 2,145.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | 227-76-3525 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 11,050.00 | 920.83 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| THOMAS, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | 15,250.00 | 1,262.50 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\n| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | |\n| TINADERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6965 | 11,700.00 | 975.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 TO 02/28/77\n\nOFFICE: 83000: SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY | PAY NUMBER | SCHEDULE | PAY | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|---------------------|-----------------|------------|----------|-----|---------------|-----------|------|------|-------|---------|\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | | | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | | |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | | | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |\n| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | | | | |\n| WOLF, JAMES-LERER | 057-40-6887 | | | | 18,850.00 | 1,570.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 415-84-5593 | | | | 14,369.66 | 1,191.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | | | | | | | | | | |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | | | | | | | | | |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNEXPENDED | NEXT MONTH | UNEXPENDED | APPROPRIATION TOTAL |\n|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|------------|------------|---------------------|\n| 73 | 0 | 34,516.00 | 83,454.93 | 48,938.93 | 85,101.93 | 134,040.86 | 20,274.93 |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\nAllowed:\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10106.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 12, "total-input-tokens": 12828, "total-output-tokens": 10931, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 1274, 1], [1274, 2506, 2], [2506, 4828, 3], [4828, 7003, 4], [7003, 8523, 5], [8523, 9941, 6], [9941, 11451, 7], [11451, 13102, 8], [13102, 15652, 9], [15652, 18614, 10], [18614, 21529, 11], [21529, 23810, 12]]}} {"id": "c0d04d1f813902d420d6f7a68d69b59905c4813c", "text": "| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|-----------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BAISH, EDITH | 169-16-0121 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BROOTEN, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | | 22,100.00 | 1,907.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | | 22,100.00 | 1,907.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | | 20,964.00 | 139.09 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | | 16,250.00 | 1,402.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | | 01-03-77 |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-01-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|-------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 13,650.00 | 1,178.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |\n| HINDLE, LOUIS M | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | |\n| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | |\n| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | |\n| JENKINS, NANCY S | 216-40-9950 | 10,920.00 | 942.66 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 20,800.00 | 1,795.56 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | |\n| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | | |\n| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 529-60-6414 | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | |\n| LAWSON, BELFORD L, III | 579-58-9975 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 14,950.00 | 1,290.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |\n| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | 22,100.00 | 1,807.78 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |\n| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|--------------------------|\n| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | | 10,000.00 | 844.45 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | | |\n| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | | |\n| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |\n| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 10,000.00 | 838.89 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| RISINGER, MARLIN. III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |\n| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |\n| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | | 25,740.00 | 2,222.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |\n| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 11,050.00 | 953.88 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 16,250.00 | 1,402.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |\n| TINAJERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6905 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 01/01/77 TO 01/31/77\n\nOFFICE: 06689, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\nU.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\nFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM\n\nPAYROLL CERTIFICATION\n\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 01/01/77 TO 01/31/77\n\nOFFICE: 06689. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL PAY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|------------|-----------|----------------|---------|\n| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 18,850.00 | 1,627.22 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | 14,300.00 | 1,234.44 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|\n| 73 | 0 | 51,629.27 | 86,145.53 | -34,516.26 | 85,101.93 | 119,618.19 | |\n\nI CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.\n\nAllowed\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | FROM TO PERIOD | REMARKS |\n|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|---------------|---------|\n| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| AMATO, CAROLYN HANSEN | 257-56-9440 | 16,000.00 | 666.67 | 12-01-76 12-15-76 TERMINATED 12-15-76 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| BAISH, EDITH | 169-16-0121 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |\n| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-0164 | 13,000.00 | 144.44 | 12-27-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-27-76 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| DONIER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | 14,000.00 | 700.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| DOHER, LEWIS JR | 205-26-3636 | 34,000.00 | 2,361.11 | 12-06-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-06-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BROGEN, KENNETH EDWARD JR | 519-42-7339 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 83.33 | 12-29-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-29-76 |\n| RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |\n| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 20,000.00 | 888.89 | 12-15-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-15-76 |\n| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | |\n| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 425.00 | 12-14-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-14-76 |\n| MESSENGER | | | | | |\n| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 26,000.00 | 1,300.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |\n| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25,000.00 | 69.44 | 12-30-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-30-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |\n| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 2,400.00 | 12-07-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-07-76 |\n| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| FEENSY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| ADMINISTRATOR | | | | | |\n| FENTON, CLIFFORD A JR | 082-22-5909 | 26,000.00 | 1,300.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |\n| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |\n| GANNON, THOMAS M SJ | 160-30-1309 | 20,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |\n| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |\n| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |\n| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |\n| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14,000.00 | 38.99 | 12-30-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-30-76 |\n| SECRETARY | | | | | |\n| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-01-76 |\n| Employee Name | Social Security Number | Pay Schedule | Annual Salary | Gross Pay | Period From | Period To | Remarks |\n|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|\n| Hess, Jacqueline | 220-48-5696 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |\n| Howarth, Thomas | 015-18-1366 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |\n| Jenkins, Nancy S | 216-40-9950 | 16,800.00 | 186.67 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |\n| Kilker, Elizabeth A | 161-38-7640 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Larson, Billie Gay | 529-60-6414 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | P/R Change - 12-01-76 |\n| Lewis, Belford L. III | 579-58-9975 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |\n| Lehner, Robert J | 071-28-5111 | 36,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-06-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-06-76 |\n| Locke, Ralph C | 017-36-1972 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Martin, Rebecca W | 518-56-7099 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| McCray, Denise Louise | 577-72-8453 | 12,000.00 | 600.00 | 12-13-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-13-76 |\n| McPherson, Vivian L. | 240-66-7674 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Mordana, Sari | 102-30-2631 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Moriarty, John J | 579-24-3862 | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |\n| Morrison, Robert C | 403-36-7980 | 14,000.00 | 700.00 | 12-13-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-13-76 |\n| Morton, Rita L | 579-64-6855 | 14,000.00 | 155.56 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |\n| Orr, Patricia M | 215-66-2717 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Orr, Phoebe Curtis | 219-64-3205 | 11,000.00 | 458.33 | 12-16-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-16-76 |\n| Ozer, Robert C | 174-32-6125 | 39,600.00 | 770.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-07-76 | | Terminated 12-07-76 |\n| Price, Patricia Lynn | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 270.83 | 12-16-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-16-76 |\n| Purdy, Donald A. Jr | 322-39-9707 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |\n| Risinger, Marlin III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 111.11 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |\n| Roberts, Antoinette Morris | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 350.00 | 12-22-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-22-76 |\n| Smith, Johanna Lynn | 528-64-5299 | 8,000.00 | 666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n| Sprague, Richard A | 402-30-6486 | 39,600.00 | 3,300.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |\n\nOffice: 06689. Select Committee on Assassinations\n\nAccounting Period 12/01/76 to 12/31/76\nACCOUNTING PERIOD 12/01/76 TO 12/31/76\n\nOFFICE: 06689, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\n\n| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |\n|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|------------------|\n| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON SECRETARY | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 116.67/ | 12-28-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-28-76 |\n| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 127-32-4970 | | 36,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-06-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-06-76 |\n| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT SPECIAL ASSISTANT | 579-54-1505 | | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |\n| TINAJENO, DOROTHY R TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | 427-54-6905 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |\n| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |\n| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 83.33/ | 12-28-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-28-76 |\n| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 886.11/ | 12-20-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-20-76 |\n\nOFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY\n\n| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNEXPENDED | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH | UNEXPENDED | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |\n|---------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|\n| 50 | 0 | 110,548.02 | 61,716.39 | 48,832.53 | 81,991.70 | 33,159.17 | | |\n\nCORRECT: SERVICES RENDERED.\nI FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE PERSONS NAMED ON THE WITHIN PAYROLL IS NOT PROHIBITED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF LAW LIMITING THE AVAILABILITY OF THE APPROPRIATION(S) INVOLVED\n\n[Signature]\n\nChairman, House Administration Comm.\n\nAllowed:\n\nEmployee paid in supplemental payroll", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10107.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 7, "total-input-tokens": 7779, "total-output-tokens": 12943, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 6027, 1], [6027, 11703, 2], [11703, 19148, 3], [19148, 20950, 4], [20950, 23724, 5], [23724, 27838, 6], [27838, 30272, 7]]}} {"id": "37f54c98f0f3acd6fd81dab9976a531136c51897", "text": "Agency Information\n\nAGENCY: HSCA\nRECORD NUMBER: 180-10125-10172\nRECORD SERIES: SECURITY VIOLATION CASE FILE\nAGENCY FILE NUMBER:\n\nDocument Information\n\nORIGINATOR: HSCA\nFROM:\nTO:\nTITLE:\n\nDATE: 07/00/1978\nPAGES: 100\n\nSUBJECTS:\nPHOTOGRAPHS AND FILM\nKENNEDY, JOHN, AUTOPSY\nBLAHUT, REGIS\nHSCA, ADMINISTRATION\nCIA, STAFF\nHSCA, FILES\n\nDOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT\nCLASSIFICATION: Unclassified\nRESTRICTIONS: Consulted\nCURRENT STATUS: Withhold\nDATE OF LAST REVIEW: 08/20/1993\n\nOPENING CRITERIA:\n\nCOMMENTS: Box 1.\n\nReleased under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case# NW 88326 Date: 2025\nSelect Committee on Assassinations\nU.S. House of Representatives\n3331 House Office Building, Annex 2\nWashington, D.C. 20515\n\n3-26-79\n\nTo whom it may concern:\n\nThis file is of an unusual nature because it deals with an incident involving a CIA employee and this committee. It has not been logged into our system by agreement with the CIA.\n\nLance Swindon\nDirector of Security\n\nIt's a very interesting story.\nJuly 14, 1978\n\nTO: Mr. G. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel and Director\nSelect Committee on Assassinations\nU. S. House of Representatives\n3331 House Office Building\nAnnex 2\nWashington, D. C. 20515\n\nRE: REQUEST BY HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS\nU. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)\nFOR LATENT PRINT COMPARISONS\n\nLetter July 13, 1978, and specimens delivered to\nLatent Fingerprint Section on July 13, 1978\n\nREFERENCE:\nEXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Addressee\nSPECIMENS:\nTwo cards bearing five transparent lifts\nFive photographs of enlarged inked fingerprints\n\nThis report supplements and confirms the\ninformation personally furnished to Mr. Kenneth\nKlein on July 13, 1978.\n\nThe specimens were examined and four latent\nfingerprints of value for identification purposes\nare present on three of the transparent lifts.\n\nThe latent fingerprint, which is present\non the lift on the card bearing the notation \"off\nback of 39E2,\" and the inked fingerprint appearing\nin the two photographs designated A-1 and A-2 in\nthe Latent Fingerprint Section were made by one\nand the same individual.\n\n(Continued on next page)\nMr. G. Robert Blakey\n\nJuly 14, 1978\n\nThe two latent fingerprints, which are present on one lift on the card bearing the notation \"B - from inside outer edge of safe door,\" and the inked fingerprints appearing in the two photographs designated B and C in the Latent Fingerprint Section were made by one and the same individual.\n\nThe remaining latent fingerprint is not identical with the inked fingerprints appearing in the five submitted photographs.\n\nThe specimens are being retained in the Latent Fingerprint Section until called for by a representative of your office.\noff back of 39E2\nA = from face of safe drawer\nB = from inside outer edge of safe door\n\nA. Flanagan, Thomas Mark\n10y Prints\n7-10-28\n2:30\n4 RB\n| Name | Approved | Date |\n|--------|----------|--------|\n| Fenton | | |\n| Hess | | |\n| Gay | | |\n| Klein | | |\n| Wolf | | |\n| Cornwall | | 7/13 |\n| Blakey | | 7-13-25 |\n\nCornwell\nSelect Committee on Assassinations\nU.S. House of Representatives\n3331 House Office Building, Annex 2\nWashington, D.C. 20515\n\nJuly 13, 1978\n\nThe Honorable Griffin B. Bell\nAttorney General of the United States\nDepartment of Justice\nWashington, D.C.\n\nAttn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch\nDeputy Assistant Attorney General\nCriminal Division, Room 2112\n\nDear Mr. Attorney General:\n\nThis is to request that the Federal Bureau of Investigation provide the Select Committee with a qualified fingerprint expert to examine certain lifted and known fingerprints, and to render an opinion as to whether they are the fingerprints of the same person.\n\nThank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.\n\nSincerely,\n\nG. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel and Director\n\nGRB: gcd\n\ncc: Danny Coulson\n| Approved | Date |\n|----------|----------|\n| Fenton | |\n| Hess | |\n| Gay | |\n| Klein | |\n| Wolf | |\n| Cornwell | |\n| Blakey | 6-21-78 |\n\nDRAFTED BY: [Signature]\nThe Honorable Griffin B. Bell \nAttorney General of the United States \nDepartment of Justice \nWashington, D. C. 20530\n\nAttn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch \nDeputy Assistant Attorney General \nCriminal Division, Room 2113\n\nDear Mr. Attorney General:\n\nThis is to request that the fingerprint cards prepared in connection with the FBI security background check on the following staff people be returned, temporarily, to the Committee:\n\nAndy Purdy \nMark Flanagan \nMitch Mars \nDan Hardway \nEddie Lopez \nLance Svendsen \nOliver Champion \nBill Cross \nBob Morrison \nBetty Lou Sisson\n\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\n\nSincerely,\n\nLOUIS STOKES \nChairman\n\nLS:dm\n\ncc: Danny Coulson\nOUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE\n\nTO: Griffin Bell\n\n| Approved | Date |\n|----------|------|\n| Fenton | |\n| Hess | |\n| Gay | |\n| Klein | |\n| Wolf | |\n| Cornwell | |\n| Blakey | 6-29-78 |\n\nDRAFTED BY: Dawn Miller\nJune 29, 1978\n\nThe Honorable Griffin B. Bell\nAttorney General of the United States\nDepartment of Justice\nWashington, D. C. 20530\n\nAttn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch\nDeputy Assistant Attorney General\nCriminal Division, Room 2113\n\nDear Mr. Attorney General:\n\nThis is to request that the fingerprint cards prepared in connection with the FBI security background check on the following staff people be returned, temporarily, to the Committee:\n\nJoseph Basteri 10/24/22\nNew York City\n\nWilliam Brown 9/18/28\nNew Orleans, LA\n\nRobert Buras 7/13/37\nMemphis, TN\n\nJudith Burford 9/14/55\nBrooklyn, NY\n\nMartin Daly 7/11/29\nClarence Day\n\nLawrence Delsa 8/11/43\nNew Orleans, LA\n\nEileen Dineen 9/14/48\nPhiladelphia, PA\n\nMarjorie Eagle 10/2/23\nNorth Carolina\n\nFrank Eccles 11/7/24\nNew York, NY\n\nAl Gonzales 4/22/23\nWashington, DC\n\nSusan Grimes 11/14/49\nPittsburgh, PA\n\nJohn Hornbeck 1/23/40\n\nE. M. Hutton 9/25/20\nHampton, VA\n\nRalph Locke 2/10/53\nBoston, MA\n\nVivian McPherson 2/4/43\nNorfolk, VA\n\nFloyd Reeves 2/25/43\nTampa, Florida\n\nGina Resnick 4/3/53\nNew Brunswick, NJ\n\nMarlin Risinger 1/28/54\nShreveport, LA\n\nHarold Rose 9/28/28\nBaltimore, MD\n\nElizabeth Selleck 12/3/48\nWenatchee, WA\n\nAnn Strickland 8/4/49\nRocky Mount, N.C.\n\nAnn Taylor 12/19/49\nSan Diego, CA\n\nJoseph Thomas 10/13/35\nMary's County\n\nWilliam Triplett 8/18/40\nDelaware, CA\n\nRobert Walker 9/11/22\nAtlanta, GA\n\nRichard Wrase 6/19/28\nNew York, NY\n\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\n\nSincerely,\n\nLOUIS STOKES\nChairman\n\nLS:dm\n\ncc: Danny Coulson\nNOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS\n\nI, William H. Cross, hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of twenty-three (23) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:\n\n| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |\n|-----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------|\n| Basteri, Joseph John | 10-24-22 | U.S.A. |\n| Brown, William | 9-8-28 | New York, New York |\n| Burford, Judith Renee | 9-24-55 | Memphis, Tennessee |\n| Daly, Martin James | 7-1-29 | New York, New York |\n| Day, Clarence Joseph | 1-8-31 | Alexandria, Virginia |\n| Eagle, Marjorie Ann | 10-2-23 | Phoenixville, Pennsylvania |\n| Gonzales, Albert | 4-22-23 | New York, New York |\n| Grimes, Mary Susan | 11-4-49 | Washington, D. C. |\n| Hornbeck, John William| 1-23-40 | Pennsylvania |\n| Hutton, Elbert McKinley| 9-25-20 | Hampton, Virginia |\n| Locke, Ralph Christopher| 2-10-53 | Boston, Massachusetts |\n| Lopez, Edwin Juan | 5-3-55 | New York |\n| McPherson, Vivian Leigh| 2-4-43 | Norfolk, Virginia |\n| Reeves, Floyd Leroy | 7-25-43 | Tampa, Florida |\n| Resnick, Gina Irene | 4-3-53 | New Jersey |\n| Risinger, Marlin III | 12-8-54 | Louisiana |\n| Rose, Harold A. | 9-28-28 | Baltimore, Maryland |\n| Strickland, Ann Lyon | 8-4-46 | Rocky Mount, N. Carolina |\n| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 12-19-49 | San Diego, California |\n| Thomas, Joseph Aloysious| 10-13-31 | Maryland |\n| Triplett, William Karrol| 8-8-40 | Delano, California |\n| Walker, Robert James | 9-1-23 | Atlanta, Georgia |\n| Wrase, Richard Charles| 6-19-28 | New York, New York |\n\nRecei'd from W.H. Cross 7/5/78 above Fingerprint Card.\n\nSigned William H. Cross\n\nTitle Assistant Director of Security HSCA\nNOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS\n\nI, William H. Cross, hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of twenty-three (23) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:\n\n| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |\n|-----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------|\n| Basteri, Joseph John | 10-24-22 | U.S.A. |\n| Brown, William | 9-8-28 | New York, New York |\n| Burford, Judith Renee | 9-24-55 | Memphis, Tennessee |\n| Daly, Martin James | 7-1-29 | New York, New York |\n| Day, Clarence Joseph | 1-8-31 | Alexandria, Virginia |\n| Eagle, Marjorie Ann | 10-2-23 | Phoenixville, Pennsylvania |\n| Gonzales, Albert | 4-22-23 | New York, New York |\n| Grimes, Mary Susan | 11-4-49 | Washington, D. C. |\n| Hornbeck, John William| 1-23-40 | Pennsylvania |\n| Hutton, Elbert McKinley| 9-25-20 | Hampton, Virginia |\n| Locke, Ralph Christopher| 2-10-53 | Boston, Massachusetts |\n| Lopez, Edwin Juan | 5-3-55 | New York |\n| McPherson, Vivian Leigh| 2-4-43 | Norfolk, Virginia |\n| Reeves, Floyd Leroy | 7-25-43 | Tampa, Florida |\n| Resnick, Gina Irene | 4-3-53 | New Jersey |\n| Risinger, Marlin III | 12-8-54 | Louisiana |\n| Rose, Harold A. | 9-28-28 | Baltimore, Maryland |\n| Strickland, Ann Lyon | 8-4-46 | Rocky Mount, N. Carolina |\n| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 12-19-49 | San Diego, California |\n| Thomas, Joseph Aloysious| 10-13-31 | Maryland |\n| Triplett, William Karrol| 8-8-40 | Delano, California |\n| Walker, Robert James | 9-1-23 | Atlanta, Georgia |\n| Wrase, Richard Charles| 6-19-28 | New York, New York |\n\nSigned [Signature]\n\nTitle Assistant Director of Security HSCA\nJune 28, 1978\n\nNOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS\n\nI, [Name], hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of eight (8) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:\n\n| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |\n|-----------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|\n| 1. Champion, Oliver John | 6-12-55 | Jersey City, N. J. |\n| 2. Cross, William Horace | 8-22-32 | Washington, D. C. |\n| 3. Flanagan, Thomas Mark | 8-25-54 | Pittsburgh, Pa. |\n| 4. Hardway, Danny Lynn | 2-15-54 | Webster Springs, W. Va. |\n| 5. Mars, Mitchell Allen | 9-13-52 | Chicago, Illinois |\n| 6. Morrison, Robert Crittendon | 7-7-33 | Glasgow, Kentucky |\n| 7. Purdy, Donald Alexander, Jr. | 4-5-51 | Philadelphia, Pa. |\n| 8. S\u00f8ndsen, Lance William | 9-8-52 | Great Lakes, Illinois |\n\nSigned [Signature]\n\nTitle [Title]\n\n[Signature]\n\n[Date] 7-28-78\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON PRINTING SLAB.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN IMPRESSION OR DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPOINTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY OFFICIALS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n3. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS.\n4. OFFICIALS OF FEDERALLY CHARTERED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO PROTECT OR MAINTAIN THE SECURITY OF THOSE INSTITUTIONS.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n2. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n3. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n4. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n5. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n6. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n7. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n8. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n9. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n10. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n11. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n12. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n13. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n14. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n15. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n16. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n17. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n18. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n19. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.\n20. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.\n\nRECORDED\nNOV 25 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 78\n\nAPR 4 1978 1750\nMAR 24 1978 1635\nWilliam Breed\n120-17 Arrow Place\nBronx, 10475, NY\nUSA\nMB 6-24-21\nBR BL\nNYC\n\nUS House of Rep\nWash. DC\n\n9-8-28\n\n15 M 5 U 00 I 12\nI 1 U 10 I\n\n09-20-3182\n\nFingerprints\n1. LOOP\n\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE MINDPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK ON THE FINGER.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING PAD.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGER ON INKING PAD, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN IMPRESSION IS INCOMPLETE, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NEW STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. RETAIN THE UNPRINTED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST MINDPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFICATION APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND FOR USE IN AUTHORIZED BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL PURPOSES.\n3. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN CONNECTION WITH CLEARANCES.\n4. PERSONS GENERALLY QUALIFIED FOR HUMAN RECOGNITION IDENTIFICATION.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n2. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n3. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n4. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n5. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n6. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n7. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n8. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n9. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n10. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.\n\nRECORDED\nAUG 16 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 9\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE PRESSURE EVENLY ON ROLLING BLANK.\n3. ROLL AND ROLL TOWARDS CENTER.\n4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. PRESSURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN AMOUNT OF DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD IS FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION OF AUTHORIZED BY STATE TO PERFORM AND AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.\n3. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.\n4. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.\n2. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.\n3. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.\n4. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.\n\nRECORDED\nJUL 7 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 36\nMartin J. Daly\n109A Frederick Circle\nCharlottesville, Virg.\nU.S.\n\n8/8/70\n\nHouse Select Committee\nOn Assassinations\n\n132-14-2717\n\nUSHOR000Z A\nUS HOUSE OF REP\nWASH. DC\n\n07 01 29\n\nM W 76 215 BlueBwn N.Y.C.\n\n14 M 07 W M00 13\n\nS 2K 001\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 37\n1. LOOP\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW\n\nTHE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTA MUST BE CLEAR\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nCENTER OF LOOP\n\nDELTA\n\nTHIS CARD IS FOR USE BY:\n\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL IN PROCESSING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERMITS.\n\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION.\n\n3. OFFICIALS OF STATE UNITS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n\n4. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n\n5. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n\n6. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n\nLEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK\n\nRECORDED\nAUG 22 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 38\nGonzales Albert\nUSHORD00Z A\nUS HOUSE OF REP\nWASH. DC\n4- 22- 23\nM-W 6\" 4\" 250 Brn Gr N.Y., N.Y.\n14 0 13 0 000 10\nM 18 R 000\n\nSelect Committee on\nAssassinations. Annex 2\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTERS INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS TIGHTLY TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN APPLICATION OR DEPARTMENT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, HAVE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR FREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES.\n3. PERSONS WHOSE OCCUPATIONS REQUIRE THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS.\n4. PERSONS WHOSE OCCUPATIONS REQUIRE THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS.\n\nAPR 3 1978 3 4\n\nRECORDED\nAPR 27 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS PROPERLY TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN APPLICANT OR DEFENDANT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MANY IMPRESSIONS FALL INTO THE PATTERN SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR FREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, REGISTRATION, OR AUTHORIZATION.\n3. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, AND LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.\n4. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, AND LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.\n\nCONTINUOUS PRINT\n1. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.\n2. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.\n3. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.\n4. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.\n\nRECORDED\nSEP 26 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 70\n\nAPR 4 1978 1750\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTERS INK.\n2. INK FINGERS EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN AMPUTATION OR DEFORMITY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IMPROBABILITY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF CONVICTION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION, OR AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL, AND COUNTY COUNCILS.\n3. PERSONS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED IN APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL LEGISLATION.\n4. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n5. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n6. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n7. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n8. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n9. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n10. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n11. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n12. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n13. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n14. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n15. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n16. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n17. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n18. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n19. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n20. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nRECORDED\nJUL 11 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 9\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 50\nRocke, Ralph Christopher\nUSHOR000Z A\nUS HOUSE OF REP\nWASH. DC\n2-10-53\nM W 5'8\" 150 bl br Boston, Mass.\n\nsecurity clearance for sensitive position\n\n017-36-1972\n\n815 Massachusetts Ave. NE\nWashington, D.C. 20002\n\nSelect Committee on Assassinations,\nWashington, D.C. 20515\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 51\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INK PAD.\n3. DRY AND DRY FINGER THOROUGHLY.\n4. POLISH FINGER FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE REGISTRED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN ANOMALY OR DEFECT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME FINGERPRINTS CANNOT BE OBTAINED, MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SHOW THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEND STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. INCLUDE ALL IDENTIFIED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT ONLY IMPRESSIONS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n\n1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n2. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n3. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n4. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n5. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n6. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n7. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n8. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nRECORDED\nAPR 29 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n1. LOOP\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW CLEAR LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n\n1. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE CLEAR AND SHOW THE CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA.\n\n2. WHORLS MUST SHOW CLEAR LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS.\n\n3. ARCHES MUST HAVE NO DELTAS.\n\nRECORDED\nJUL 27 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 9\n1. LOOP\n\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE IN EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. ROLL AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS CLEARLY TO HAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN AMOUNT OF DEFORMATION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. CHECKING AND COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, HEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERN SHOWN ON THIS CARD OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR RARELY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW\n\nTHOSE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS.\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n2. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n3. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n4. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n5. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n6. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n7. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n8. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.\n\nLEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK\n\nAPR 3 1978 3 7 9\n\nRECORDED\nAPR 29 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n| REEVES, FLOYD | LEROY |\n|---------------|-------|\n| N/A | US HOUSE OF REP WASH. DC |\n| | 7 25 43 |\n| | M B 6' 195 BR. BLK. Tampa, Fla. |\n\n254-66-1801\n\nU.S. HOUSE OF REP. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS, Washington, D.C. 20515\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK ONLY.\n2. PRESS THE INK ON FINGER BLADE.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO HAIL AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN AMPUTATION OR DISABILITY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME FINGER CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NAIL STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IRREGULARLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN RECORDING THIS APPLICANT'S CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS.\n2. OFFICIALS IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, RECORDING, AND PERMITTING AUTHORIZED BY STATE AND LOCAL LAW AND AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.\n3. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.\n4. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.\n2. PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, APPLIES TO THIS CARD. PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED ON THIS CARD IS SUBJECT TO THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER. PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED ON THIS CARD IS SUBJECT TO THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER.\n3. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.\n4. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.\n5. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.\n\nRECORDED\nMAY 2 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n\nNW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 62\nHarold A. Rose\n1907 Tadcaster Rd.\nBaltimore, Maryland 21228\n\nU.S. House of Rep.\nWash. DC\n\nSept. 28, 1928\n\nM 30 W 101\n22 U 007\n\n220-20-6648\n\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations\nSelect Committee on Assassinations\n\n227-76-3525\nTaylor Ann Furnald\nUS House of Rep\nWash. DC\n12-19-49\nF W 5'4\" 127 BL BK San Diego, Ca\nFEMALE\n0 M 25 W II 015\nM 17 U 010\n\nEmployment\n036-34-9187\n\n2506 Lakevale Dr.\nVienna, Virginia\n\nU.S. House of Representatives\nH.O.B. Annex #2\n\n[Handwritten notes and fingerprints]\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INKING ROLLER.\n2. DEPLETE THE INKING ROLLER BLANK.\n3. ROLL AND ROLL FINGER TIP.\n4. ROLL FINGER TIP UNTIL ROLLER AND AVOID ALLOWING DROPS TO SLIP.\n5. BE SURE ROLLER IS CLEAN AND RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN INKED ROLLER IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT ON THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER PRINT.\n7. IF SOME ROLLER POSITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SIMPLY\n THE NEXT ROLL THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NEW ROLLER TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. CLEARLY THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT\n MOST PRINTS HAVE FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR\n IMPROBABILITY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHE CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR USE BUT NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION.\n3. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n4. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n5. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n6. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n7. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n8. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n9. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n10. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n11. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n12. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n13. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n14. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n15. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n16. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n17. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n18. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n19. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n20. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.\n\nRECORDED\nJUL 22 1977\nIDENT. DIV. II\nWalker, Robert James\n\nUS House of Rep\nWash. DC\n\nClearance.\n\n260-40-73/9\n\nLEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY\n\nRIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. Use black printer's ink.\n2. Distribute ink evenly on inking slab.\n3. Wash and dry fingers thoroughly.\n4. Roll fingers from nail to nail, and avoid allowing fingers to slip.\n5. Be sure impressions are recorded in correct order.\n6. If an annotation or deformity makes it impossible to print a finger, make a notation to that effect in the individual fingerprint block.\n7. If some physical condition makes it impossible to obtain perfect impressions, submit the best that can be obtained with a memo stapled to the card explaining the circumstances.\n8. Examine the completed prints to see if they can be classified, bearing in mind that most fingerprints fall into the patterns shown on this card (other patterns occur infrequently and are not shown here).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. Law enforcement agencies in fingerprinting applicants for law enforcement positions.*\n2. Officials of state and local governments for purposes of employment, licensing, and permits, as authorized by state statutes and approved by the Attorney General of the United States, local and county ordinances, unless specifically based on applicable state statutes do not satisfy this requirement.\n3. All government agencies in connection with clearances.*\n4. Officials of federally chartered or insured banking institutions to protect or maintain the security of those institutions.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. Prints must first be checked through the appropriate state identification bureau, and only those fingerprints for which no disqualifying record has been found locally should be submitted for FBI search.\n2. Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-502) requires that federal, state, or local agencies inform individuals whose social security number is requested whether such disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, and if authority for such solicitation, and uses which will be made of it.\n3. Identity of private contractors should be shown in space \"employer and address.\" The contractor is the name of the agency submitting the fingerprint card to the FBI.\n4. For members, it should always be furnished in the appropriate space.\n\nMISCELLANEOUS NO. \u2014 Record: Other Armed Forces No., Passport No., Alien Registration No., Alien Registration No. (AR), Port of Entry, Selective Service No. (SS), Veteran's Administration Claim No. (VAC).\nWRAESE, Richard Charles\n\n37 Clearview Dr\nWheatley Heights, N.Y. 11798\n\nU.S. House of Rep.\nWash. D.C.\n\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations Clearance\n\n113-18-5784\n\n6-19-28\n\nM W 6'4\" 270 Bl 66 Y H Y. N Y.\n\n10\n\nm 17 R\n\n17\n1. LOOP\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST NOT SHOW\n\nTHESE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nTO OBTAIN CLEAR AND DEEP FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE THE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.\n4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AGAIN ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. PRESS IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN AMPLIFICATION OR DEFORMATION MAKES IT IMPRACTICAL TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A HAND STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR RARELY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE LAWS AND APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL AND COUNTY COMMISSIONS, UNIFICATION BOARD OR APPLICABLE STATE AGENCIES, OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENCIES.\n3. ALL OTHER AGENCIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRIMES.\n\nNOTE: THIS CARD IS NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES OR TO MAINTAIN THE SECURITY OF FINGERPRINTS.\n\nRECORDED\nAPR 4 1978 1750\n\nRECORDED\nNOV 7 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 79\n1. LOOP\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\nTHE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW\n\nBASE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n\n1. USE BLACK INK.\n2. FINGERPRINTS SHOULD BE MADE ON INKED SLAB.\n3. PRESS AND ROLL PRINTS TO OBTAIN.\n4. ROLL PRINTS FACING DOWN TO MAIL, AND AVOID ALL ONGOING HANDS TO CLIP.\n5. ALL PRINTS ARE TO BE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN INKED SLAB IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGERPRINT.\n7. IF SOME FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STATED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED. REMEMBER IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD. (SOME PATTERNS OCCUR INHERENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.)\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LIKE POLICE, AND FORENSIC, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n3. LOCAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.\n4. LOCAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.\n\nIDENTIFICATION:\n\n1. FORCES PRINTS SHOULD BE TAKEN THROUGH THE APPLICABLE FINGERPRINTING PROCEDURE AND ONLY THOSE PRINTS WHICH SHOW CLEARLY SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.\n2. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.\n3. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.\n4. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.\n\nRECORDED SEP 15 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 70\n1. LOOP\n\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.\n2. DISTRIBUTE INDIVIDUALLY ON INKING SLAB.\n3. PRESS AND ROLL FINGER, INDIVIDUALLY.\n4. ROLL FINGER FORWARD TO ROLL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. FINGER IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF AN UNUSUAL OR ELONGATED IMPRESSION IS MADE TO PERMIT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.\n7. IF SOME FINGER IMPRESSIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, HAVING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IRREGULARLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).\n\n2. WHORL\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPOINTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, LOCAL AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OR OTHER AUTHORITY BASED ON APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES.\n3. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n4. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n5. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n6. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n7. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n8. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.\n\n3. ARCH\n\nARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS\n\nRECORDED\nAUG 10 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 58\nFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20537\n\nAPPLICANT\n\nTO OBTAIN CLASSIFIED FINGERPRINTS:\n1. USE BLACK INK OR PENCIL.\n2. INK MUST BE APPLIED ON BOTH SIDES.\n3. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE CLEAR.\n4. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE TAKEN AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.\n5. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE TAKEN IN CORRECT ORDER.\n6. IF ANY FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION ON THE BACK OF THE MECHANICAL FINGER CLIP.\n7. IF ANY FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE CARD THAT CAN BE COMPLETED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.\n8. ENSURE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO BE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, READING IN MIND THAT\n9. FINGERPRINTS THAT HAVE THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR\n10. UNREADABLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.\n\nTHIS CARD FOR USE BY:\n1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.\n2. REGULARS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURCHASE OF CLOTHING, EQUIPMENT, AND SUPPLIES.\n3. AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.\n4. LOCAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS TO IDENTIFY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.\n5. EMPLOYERS OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND OTHER INDUSTRIES.\n6. EMPLOYERS OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND OTHER INDUSTRIES.\n\nINSTRUCTIONS:\n1. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.\n2. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.\n3. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.\n4. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.\n5. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.\n\nAPR 4 1978 1750\nRECORDED\nJUL 22 1977\nIDENT. DIV. 15\n| LAST NAME | FIRST NAME | MIDDLE NAME | SEX | RACE |\n|-----------|------------|-------------|-----|------|\n| | | | | |\n\n| FINGERPRINTS SUBMITTED BY |\n|---------------------------|\n| |\n\n| SIGNATURE OF PERSON FINGERPRINTED |\n|----------------------------------|\n| |\n\n| RESIDENCE OF PERSON FINGERPRINTED |\n|----------------------------------|\n| |\n\n| DATE FINGERPRINTED |\n|--------------------|\n| |\n\n| LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK |\n|------------------------|\n| |\n\n| PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY |\n|--------------------------------------------|\n| NAME |\n| ADDRESS |\n\n| DATE FINGERPRINTED |\n|--------------------|\n| |\n\n| PLACE OF BIRTH |\n|----------------|\n| |\n\n| CLASS. |\n|--------|\n| |\n\n| CITIZENSHIP |\n|------------|\n| |\n\n| REF. |\n|------|\n| |\n\n| SCARS AND MARKS |\n|-----------------|\n| |\n\nSee Reverse Side for Further Instructions\n\n| 1. RIGHT THUMB | 2. RIGHT INDEX | 3. RIGHT MIDDLE | 4. RIGHT RING | 5. RIGHT LITTLE |\n|----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------|-----------------|\n| | | | | |\n\n| 6. LEFT THUMB | 7. LEFT INDEX | 8. LEFT MIDDLE | 9. LEFT RING | 10. LEFT LITTLE |\n|---------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------------|\n| | | | | |\n\n| LEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |\n|---------------------------------------|\n| LEFT THUMB | RIGHT THUMB | RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |\n| | | |\nTo obtain classifiable fingerprints:\n1. Use printer's ink.\n2. Distribute ink evenly on inking slab.\n3. Wash and dry fingers thoroughly.\n4. Roll fingers from nail to nail, and avoid allowing fingers to slip.\n5. Be sure impressions are recorded in correct order.\n6. If an amputation or deformity makes it impossible to print a finger, make a notation to that effect in the individual finger block.\n7. If some physical condition makes it impossible to obtain perfect impressions, submit the best that can be obtained with a memo stapled to the card explaining the circumstances.\n8. Examine the completed prints to see if they can be classified, bearing in mind the following:\n Most fingerprints fall into the patterns shown below (other patterns occur infrequently and are not shown here):\n\n **WHORL**\n - **DELTA**\n - **THESE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR**\n\n **ARCH**\n - **ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS**\n\n **LOOP**\n - **CENTER OF LOOP**\n - **DELTA**\n - **THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW**\nThe item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:\n\nFile Designation \n\nBlahut File\n\nDate \n\n7-11-78 and 7-13-78\n\nFrom \n\nTo \n\n2 audio cassettes\n\nInterview and questioning of Regis Blahut\n\nTHIS ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AND TRANSFERRED TO THE NATION PROPER AND SIGNED\n\nRECORDING BRANCH. separate by at end of series\nOUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT\n\nName: Scott Breckinridge\nAddress: CIA\n\nType of Contact: Telephone\n\nI. Identifying Information:\n\nII. Summary of Contact:\n\n- Called concern on possible security violation\n- Red JFK autopsy photo\n- Wanted to talk with Regis Blahut\u2014one among others who had access to area\n- Talked informally with him\n- Wanted to take more formal, i.e., tape, statement\n\nIII. Recommended Follow-up (if any):\n\nSignature: [Signature]\n\nDATE: 11-15\nTIME: 11:30\nScott said he would recommend that he be asked to cooperate. It would all go back in 0.11.\n\nScott called back and said cleared with Garbis & Regis Bea would be told O.K. by phone.\n\nLet me know when you will need\n\nPlease let me know\n\nKasikos, 1504 Long\n\n(503)\nJuly 10, 1978\n\nTO: G. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel and Director\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations\n\nFROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security\nWilliam H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security\n\nRE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.\n\nAbout 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log. Both Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.\n\nApproximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt. Pat McGinnis, Sgt Blake and Detective Pvt McGinnis was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.\n\nThe persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.\n\nOn Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.\n\nOn June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.\nThe first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a Pvt Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Identification section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt. Alford spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of Pvt Alford, and with the consent of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt Alford which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978. Pvt Alford was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. Pvt Alford stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.\n\nRobert Morrison\nDirector of Security\n\nWilliam H. Cross\nAssistant Director of Security\nOUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT\n\nDATE: July 11 1978\n\nI. Identifying Information:\n\nName: Regis Blahut\nTelephone: \n\nAddress: \n\nType of Contact: \n\nII. Summary of Contact:\n\nOn two occasions on this date Gary Cornwell and I spoke with Regis Blahut of the CIA. We first spoke to him at approximately 11AM in Gary Cornwell's office. We spoke with him a second time at approximately 2PM at which time we recorded his statement pertaining to a breach of security at the HSCA. The recorded statement fully covers the substance of the first conversation with two exceptions:\n\n1) In the first conversation Regis originally told us that he looked through an autopsy photo book after receiving permission to do so. Later, during that same conversation, when asked from whom he received permission to look through the autopsy photo book he denied having said he received permission to look through the book and stated that he at no time received permission to look through the autopsy photo book. Both Gary and I distinctly recall him telling us at the outset of the conversation that he looked through the book only after receiving permission to do so.\n\n2) In the first conversation Regis told us that he was alone in the security room when he saw the book on the window sill and decided to look through it. However, when asked during the taped recorded conversation whether he was alone when he looked through the autopsy book he then stated that there were people present in the room when he looked through the autopsy book but that he cannot recall who they were. Once again, both Gary and I clearly recall him telling us when we first spoke with him that no one was present when he looked through the photo book.\n\nIII. Recommended Follow-up:\n\nAt the outset of the recorded conversation Regis told us that he had spoken to his superior and neither he nor they had any objections to the conversation being recorded.\n\nSignature: [Signature]\n\nForm #5\nJuly 10, 1978\n\nTO: G. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel and Director\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations\n\nFROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security\nWilliam H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security\n\nRE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.\n\nAbout 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log.\n\nBoth Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.\n\nApproximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt. Pat McGinnis, Sgt Blake and Detective Pvt McGinnis was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.\n\nThe persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.\n\nOn Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.\n\nOn June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.\nThe first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a Pvt Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Identification section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt. Alford spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff member prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of Pvt Alford, and with the consent of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt Alford which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978. Pvt Alford was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. Pvt Alford stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.\n\nRobert C. Morrison\nDirector of Security\n\nWilliam H. Cross\nAssistant Director of Security\nTo: Robert C. Morrison\nFrom: William Webb\nRe: Access to Autopsy Photographs\n\nAt 3:50pm on 5/27/78 Ida Dox, the medical illustrator, requested permission to view the Kennedy autopsy photographs along with the Medical Pannel. After trying to contact Blakey and Mathews without success, I, William Webb, authorized Oliver Champion to allow the pannel and Mrs. Dox access.\nOUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT\n\nDATE July 14 11AM\n1978\n\nI. Identifying Information:\n\nName Regis Blahut\n\nTelephone\n\nAddress\n\nType of Contact: Telephone\n\nx Person\n\nII. Summary of Contact:\n\nOn this date Gary Cornwell and myself spoke with Regis Blahut in Gary's office. Mr. Blahut stated the following:\n\n1) He lied to us in our conversation of July 13 when he stated that on the second occasion he looked through the black looseleaf binder, he put it back on the window sill after reading it. He told us that the truth was that while he was looking through the book it dropped on the floor. He stated that when it dropped on the floor some of the pages came out of the book. He became frightened that someone would enter the room at this time so he opened the black safe which contained the autopsy books and placed the black looseleaf binder and the pages which had fallen out, into the top part of the safe. Prior to him opening it to put in the book, the safe door had been completely closed (i.e. notajar), although it was not locked. He said he opened it by pressing down on the handle and pulling the door open. He stated that he did not recall whether the top part of the safe\n\nIII. Recommended Follow-up (If any):\n\nSignature: ____________________________\nhad a shelf or a drawer in it. He also stated that at this time he did not observe any of the photos to be out of the plastic sheeting which ordinarily held them in the black binder. Mr. Blahut denied however that he opened the safe at any time other than when he put the book inside.\n\n2) He stated to us that the first time he had looked through the book -- the time when Jim Conzelman took it out of the safe -- he slid one of the photos partly out of the plastic to look at it. To the best of his recollection this photo was either a photo of the brain or a photo of the bust of Kennedy. He stated this was the only time that he had observed any of the photos to be out of their plastic sheeting.\n\n3) He stated that he did not wish to allow us to make a tape recording of this statement.\nOUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT\n\nDATE 7/17/78 TIME 8:00 A.M.\n\nI. Identifying Information:\n\nName Admiral Stansfield Turner Telephone\n\nAddress Central Intelligence Agency\n\nType of Contact: Telephone XX Person\n\nII. Summary of Contact:\n\nBob Blakey and I met with DCI Turner, DDCI Carlucci and Fred Hitz of the Office of Legislative Counsel at 8:00 A.M. in Turner's office. Blakey initially noted that he had come at Chairman Stokes' request to discuss with Turner a recent security violation which had been discovered by the Committee. Blakey began by describing to Turner the nature of the Kennedy autopsy pictures, the restrictions under which the Committee has acquired and possessed them, the security precautions (separate safe, limited access, and log record) utilized to safeguard them, and the possible motives that might exist for someone unlawfully removing them from the Committee.\n\nBlakey next described the circumstances and details of the Committee's discovery, made on 6/23/78, that the autopsy\n\nIII. Recommended Follow-up (if any):\nphotos had been tampered with, and the investigation which the staff thereafter conducted, including the identification of all of those persons who had access to the security space where they were located, the fingerprinting process and results, and ultimately the questioning of Regis Blahut, the CIA employee who was in the security space on that date.\n\nFinally, Blakey recalled to Turner his (Turner's) statement made to Blakey and Cornwell on February 4, 1978, to the effect that if the Committee found any impropriety or wrongdoing on the part of any CIA employee, he would personally look into and get to the bottom of it. Blakey stated that the Chairman had been told of Turner's comment on February 4, 1978, and now requested that Turner conduct a further investigation of the Blahut matter. Blakey stated that the Committee felt such an investigation was necessary for the following reasons:\n\n1. The Committee had spoken to Blahut on three occasions (July 11, 13 and 14) about his knowledge of the tampering with the autopsy photos, on two of which, by Blahut's own subsequent admissions, he had lied about significant details, and on the last of which, by independent evidence, Blahut had also lied;\n\n2. Blahut's actions were deliberate, as evidenced\nby the fact that Blahut had opened the Committee's safe in which the photos were stored, and on the first two interviews with the Committee, he lied about having done so;\n\n3. There is only one possible innocent motive for Blahut's handling and viewing of the autopsy photos, that being personal curiosity, and the evidence unequivocally shows that personal curiosity was not the motive (a page was ripped out, a photo was removed from the plastic sheeting, the log shows that the photo book in question had not been removed from the safe by the Committee staff since September, 1977, and Blahut's story about his handling of, and access to that photo book on June 23, 1978 is patently unbelievable); and most significantly,\n\n4. Prior to at least two of the three occasions on which Blahut was interviewed by the Committee staff, he spoke to his superiors at the Agency, and after each of those conversations he told lies to the Committee about his involvement.\n\nTurner said that he had already looked into the matter, and handed us a report which had been written. Turner suggested that Blakey and Cornwell go read the report (not take a copy with them from the building), and also look at Blahut's\npersonnel file, and then let the Agency know what else he (Blakey) suggested they should do.\n\nUpon inspection, the report reflected the following:\n(a.) The Agency interviewed Blahut on Friday evening, July 14, and polygraphed him three times for roughly two hours each time on Saturday, July 15;\n(b.) Blahut's supervisors had been spoken to, and denied any involvement;\n(c.) Blahut admitted lying to the Committee;\n(d.) Blahut basically told the same story to the polygraph expert (Felippo) he had finally told the Committee on the morning of July 14, except that on July 15 he admitted that he was never given permission by any Committee staff member to view the Kennedy autopsy pictures;\n(e.) Blahut persisted in his story (but lied in doing so, according to the polygraph) that he had opened the Committee safe only once, and that was to put a photo book into the safe, and also (again, untruthfully) stated that he had only viewed the autopsy books on two occasions.\n(f.) Blahut has been assigned to a CIA operation code named MHCHILD since April, 1977.\n\nOffice of Security Chief Gambino, and Carlucci's assistant, Hav Smith, met with Blakey and Cornwell after they\n\n* Polygraph showed no deception on\n 1) didn't copy\n 2) entered wrong else\n 3) didn't call in media\n 4) not \"sent on mission\"\nhad reviewed the investigative report provided by Turner. Blakey requested that he be permitted to see Blahut's security file. Gambino refused, but offered the personnel file instead.\n\nThe personnel file reflected that Blahut had consistently received excellent ratings from his superiors, that he showed leadership qualities in his work, and that he had been commended for consistently reporting to his superiors what he had observed and done during his assignments, and alerting them to any problems he encountered.\n\nFinally, Smith and Gambino asked Blakey what he felt the Agency should do now. Blakey said that full interviews of all of Blahut's supervisors should be conducted, and written reports made. In addition, Blakey stated that new polygraphs should be taken, focusing primarily on the area that was essentially omitted on July 15, namely, the question of motive.\n\nHav Smith asked whether the Committee was going to accept the Agency's investigation after it was completed; he said he wanted to know now, that he wanted a commitment. Smith said that he was 99 percent sure that the final report would show no involvement in the tampering on the part of the Agency. Gambino said, \"We know we're clean.\" In reply, I asked how the Agency could be so sure at this early point that none of their employees except Blahut were involved, and I also commented that Smith was asking the Committee to \"buy a pig in a poke\" in suggesting that we should tell him now whether or not we would be satisfied with the Agency's investigation.\n\n* The deposition report indicated Blahut said we accused him of being a \"CIA plant.\" It also said we didn't want to tape him on the 2nd occasion. Smith was similarly briefing that each statement was untrue.\nbefore it was even conducted. Both Blakey and I stated that what we could now state was that we had come to the Agency with the suggestion that they investigate it, because we felt that from among the alternatives now available to the Committee, that alternative was the one with the best chance of success. Finally Blakey also noted that his hope was that after the Agency's investigation was complete, copies of the reports could be placed in the Agency's and the Committee's files, and that would be the end of it.\n\nThe meeting was terminated with the general understanding that Blakey's suggestions would be followed, and the Agency would let us know when they had their reports complete.\nJuly 10, 1978\n\nTO: G. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel & Director\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations\n\nFROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security\nWilliam H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security\n\nRe: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe # 102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee offices.\n\nAbout 4:05 P.M. June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security room along with Lance Svendson of Security staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several autopsy photos were lying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2, 40 E and 41 E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39 E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five, Part One. An immediate check of all books was begun by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. No other photos were found to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out recently according to the check out log. Both Mark Flanagan and Lance Svendson stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was open at 10 AM June 23, 1978 if they had been lying were they were. They both feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter safe and do this. The safe was unlocked but shut.\n\nApproximately 5 P.M. June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator Jack Moriarty three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt Pat McGinniss, Sgt Blake and Det. Pvt. McGinniss was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photos book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM June 23, 1978. Investigator Moriarty, William H. Cross or G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator Moriarty, and remained in his possession.\n\nThe persons who were in this office on June 23, 1978 other than Security personnel were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.\n\nOn June 27, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain staff members print cards. The first were received the week of June 26, 1978, and the second packet on July 5, 1978. Investigator Moriarty had contacted a Pvt. Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Department ID section and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt Alford spent one hour in Committee office checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 6, 1978 the latent prints and all\nstaff members print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt. Alford which he received for so he could take them away from Committee spaces so he could spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978 Pvt. Alford was able to obtain the fingerprint card of Regis Blahut (a former D.C. Fireman) On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford contacted William Cross of Security staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahut's prints on the safe door and one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 PM Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards. The 13 cards of lifted prints, and stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were on the inside of the safe door and on photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five Part One, and had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed at 2:55 PM July 10, 1978\n\nROBERT MORRISON\n\nWILLIAM H. CROSS\nAbout 4.05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39e1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that theses photos were from Book Five Part one A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.\n\nBook Five has not been signed out recently\n\nCheck completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing\n\nThe persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez. Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA\n\nBoth mark and lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this\nAbout 4.05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39e1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five Part one. A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.\n\nBook Five has not been signed out recently.\n\nCheck completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing.\n\nThe persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA.\n\nBoth Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this.\n\nMr Blakey was notified at 5:05 PM after he completed a meeting in his office. He stated that from now on the JFK safe will be locked at all times. If something is taken out the safe will be relocked until it is returned.\n\nI suggest that until such time as the persons using that room are finished in there we should lock all the safes at all times.\n\nBill\nJuly 10, 1978\n\nNOTICE OF RECEIPT OF\nFINGERPRINT CARDS\n\nI, [Signature], hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of the following:\n\nOne (1) FD-258 Applicant Fingerprint Card for Betty Lou Sisson, date of birth 3-11-39\n\nOne (1) Photographic copy of an Armed Forces Fingerprint Card for Lawrence J. Delsa, Jr., date of birth 8-11-43\n\nSigned [Signature]\n\nTitle Security Assistant\nHouse Select Committee on Assassination\n\nClearance\n\n245-56-4327\n1. LOOP\n\n2. WHORL\n\n3. ARCH\n\n---\n\n**INSTRUCTIONS:**\n\n1. PRINTS MUST BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION BUREAU, AND ONLY THOSE FINGERPRINTS FOR WHICH NO QUALIFYING RECORD EXISTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR FINGERPRINTING.\n\n2. THE ACT OF 1925 (45 U.S.C. 77) REQUIRES THAT FINGERPRINTS BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COLLECTION AND SUBMISSION OF FINGERPRINTS TO THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.\n\n3. FINGERPRINTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.\n\n---\n\n**LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK**\n\n---\n\n**RECORDED**\n\nAUG 29 1977\n\nIDENT. DIV. 58\n| SERVICE NO. | PLACE OF BIRTH |\n|-------------|----------------|\n| | New Orleans, Louisiana |\n\n| COLOR OF EYES | LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK |\n|---------------|------------------------|\n| Green | |\n\n| COLOR OF HAIR | WEIGHT | SEX |\n|---------------|--------|-----|\n| Black | 175 | Male|\n\n| DATE OF ENLISTMENT, APPOINTMENT, ETC. | SCARS AND MARKS | SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL TAKING FINGERPRINTS | DATE SIGNED BY OFFICIAL TAKING FINGERPRINTS |\n|--------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|\n| 13 May 62 | None | | 13 May 62 |\n\n| 1. RIGHT THUMB | 2. RIGHT INDEX | 3. RIGHT MIDDLE | 4. RIGHT RING | 5. RIGHT LITTLE |\n|----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------|-----------------|\n| | | | | |\n\n| 6. LEFT THUMB | 7. LEFT INDEX | 8. LEFT MIDDLE | 9. LEFT RING | 10. LEFT LITTLE |\n|---------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------------|\n| | | | | |\n\n| LEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY | LEFT THUMB | RIGHT THUMB | RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |\n|----------------------------------------|-----------|------------|----------------------------------------|\n| | | | |\nSince neither fingerprints nor an identifying number which is indexed in our files accompanied your request, FBI cannot guarantee in any manner that this material concerns the individual in whom you are interested.\nMr. Bannen 324-5404\na Mr. Payne.\n\nRobert J. Burde, New Orleans 7/3/37\nEileen G. Duneen (Copeland) 8/14/48\nFrank L. Eccles - 1/7/24 N.C.\nEliza K. Selleck 12/31/48 Honolulu Wa\n\nThey have Season.\n\nLawrence Dulan will make photo copy\nof Military\n\n3 x 5 tissue stating no record.\nJune 27.\n\nJune 29.\n\nOn to Aldford for which he agreed a fee of \u00a325. On the 2nd week ended July 1st, he was able to deliver the fingerprint card. I kept Blechert (a former D.C. Armagh) on the 7th July. On July 7th at 230 P.M. he contacted William Cusack, a select comm. and stated he had made an effort to locate the Blechert prints on the door and one of the photos in the back end of the house. On July 10th, 1978, Pat Aldford called to the H.S.C. office in the presence of S. Blechert. Blechert, Robert Monahan and William Cusack returned all fingerprint cards. The 13 cards identified prints, and identified a certain number of prints in several prints. In his opinion, we concluded that Major Blechert had handled these items.\nOn June 27, 1978, a request was made to the FBI for certain staff fingerprint cards. These were received the week of June 26. The record on Wednesday, July 5, 1978, showed that Mr. Colen Alford of MPDC had contacted a Mr. Colen Alford of MPDC about a request he had to make concerning known and latent lifts. During the week of June 26, Mr. Alford spent one hour in committee over which Mr. Burton of staff was present. These reflected on July 5, 1978. The latest lifts and all staff fingerprint cards from FBI were turned\napprox. 5 pm Jan 23, 1978\nat the request of Investigator\nJack Mairant - 3 members of\nthe MDC I det. unit\nresponded for the purpose of\nattempting to get latent prints\noffice Det mcgraw Sgt\nBleme and Det\nMcGrain was able to get\nlatent print - 13 separate cards\nfrom the interior of rock ad\nfrom the kennedy antique photo\nbook that was tampered with.\nThese men left at approximately\n8:35 pm 1/23/78 and thurston\nmorinig, William Cus 2 C. Robert\nPfleyer were present at all times\nduring the lifting of prints.\nAbout 4:05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five Part one. A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress. No other photos were found.\n\nBook Five has not been signed out recently.\n\nCheck completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing.\n\nThe persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA.\n\nBoth Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidentally. Someone had to go into the safe and do this.\n\n25000\n\n11/78\nAbout 4:05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that theses photos were from Book Five Part one A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.\n\nBook Five has not been signed out recently\n\nCheck completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing\n\nThe persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA\n\nBoth Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this\nBook I part 1\nPhotos removed\n3921\n3922\n402\n412\n\nTwo pages total\n4 photos\n\nOne page ripped out\n3922\n3922\n\nPhoto laying out completely\n3922\n4:05 PM 6/23/78\n\n3 photos from one of the Kennedy auto\n\nBook 5\nPage 1\nAlfred\n\n727-4118\n\nBlanket - not too great\ninside outer edge of door\n\n6 to 7 feet\nleft hand\n\nBack 39 32 - 7 points\n\nMotorcycle itself back portion\n\nRuth Thunk\n\nAlfred was in his open\nBlanket is the man\n727 4118\nACFORD\n\n7AM\nTHURSDAY\n\n121-4565\nThey were fruits in the inside of the door and on 39 & 2 plates in the front and rear. After returning all material, put Alfred lift on 255 pm.\nTO G. Robert Bleck\nDirector & Chief Counsel\nHSCA\n\nFrom: Walter H. Cox\nCounsel to the Senate\nHSCA\n\nSubject: Re: Tampering with evidence\n\nEnclosed photos located in Safe 102095 in Realty Room of Room 3381. HSC Committee on Committee Office.\nJuly 10, 1978\n\nTO: G. Robert Blakey\nChief Counsel and Director\nHouse Select Committee on Assassinations\n\nFROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security\nWilliam H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security\n\nRE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.\n\nAbout 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log. Both Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.\n\nApproximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. They were able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.\n\nThe persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.\n\nOn Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.\n\nOn June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.\nThe first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978, I spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of and with the consent of Chief Counsel C. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978, I was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. I phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. I responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel C. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. I stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials, I departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.\n\nRobert C. Morrison\nDirector of Security\n\nWilliam H. Cross\nAssistant Director of Security\noff outer plastic to 39E\nOff face of 3952\noff face of 37E2\noff face of 29E outer\nOuter: plastic 39E2 Palm\nPrint\noff outer plastic\n\nPolar Points\noff outer plastic to 39 E2\nouter plastic 39E2\noff outer plastic of 43E\nfrom inside of safe door\nouter edge\noff outer plastic of 38E Palm Print", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10172.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 159, "total-input-tokens": 181077, "total-output-tokens": 32062, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 624, 1], [624, 1030, 2], [1030, 2135, 3], [2135, 2707, 4], [2707, 2707, 5], [2707, 2724, 6], [2724, 2724, 7], [2724, 2724, 8], [2724, 2724, 9], [2724, 2724, 10], [2724, 2724, 11], [2724, 2724, 12], [2724, 2724, 13], [2724, 2819, 14], [2819, 2848, 15], [2848, 2848, 16], [2848, 2848, 17], [2848, 2848, 18], [2848, 2848, 19], [2848, 2848, 20], [2848, 3138, 21], [3138, 3908, 22], [3908, 4149, 23], [4149, 4834, 24], [4834, 5085, 25], [5085, 6575, 26], [6575, 6575, 27], [6575, 8799, 28], [8799, 10962, 29], [10962, 11983, 30], [11983, 11983, 31], [11983, 17001, 32], [17001, 17165, 33], [17165, 19754, 34], [19754, 19754, 35], [19754, 21348, 36], [21348, 21612, 37], [21612, 22691, 38], [22691, 22691, 39], [22691, 22691, 40], [22691, 22691, 41], [22691, 22691, 42], [22691, 22859, 43], [22859, 22859, 44], [22859, 22859, 45], [22859, 24022, 46], [24022, 24022, 47], [24022, 25869, 48], [25869, 25869, 49], [25869, 28920, 50], [28920, 29222, 51], [29222, 30418, 52], [30418, 30418, 53], [30418, 30758, 54], [30758, 30758, 55], [30758, 32431, 56], [32431, 32700, 57], [32700, 32700, 58], [32700, 32700, 59], [32700, 32700, 60], [32700, 32700, 61], [32700, 35149, 62], [35149, 35330, 63], [35330, 35330, 64], [35330, 35378, 65], [35378, 35378, 66], [35378, 35643, 67], [35643, 35643, 68], [35643, 35643, 69], [35643, 35643, 70], [35643, 35643, 71], [35643, 38125, 72], [38125, 38278, 73], [38278, 40613, 74], [40613, 40836, 75], [40836, 42408, 76], [42408, 42408, 77], [42408, 42408, 78], [42408, 42408, 79], [42408, 42408, 80], [42408, 42408, 81], [42408, 44431, 82], [44431, 44431, 83], [44431, 44431, 84], [44431, 44431, 85], [44431, 45992, 86], [45992, 45992, 87], [45992, 45992, 88], [45992, 45992, 89], [45992, 45992, 90], [45992, 45992, 91], [45992, 47835, 92], [47835, 49733, 93], [49733, 50767, 94], [50767, 50767, 95], [50767, 51092, 96], [51092, 51552, 97], [51552, 51811, 98], [51811, 54721, 99], [54721, 56804, 100], [56804, 58732, 101], [58732, 61643, 102], [61643, 63728, 103], [63728, 64097, 104], [64097, 65349, 105], [65349, 66140, 106], [66140, 67182, 107], [67182, 68443, 108], [68443, 69642, 109], [69642, 70942, 110], [70942, 72687, 111], [72687, 73380, 112], [73380, 76205, 113], [76205, 77400, 114], [77400, 78385, 115], [78385, 79728, 116], [79728, 80103, 117], [80103, 80167, 118], [80167, 80848, 119], [80848, 82469, 120], [82469, 82684, 121], [82684, 82959, 122], [82959, 83690, 123], [83690, 84213, 124], [84213, 84719, 125], [84719, 85749, 126], [85749, 86732, 127], [86732, 86870, 128], [86870, 86940, 129], [86940, 87141, 130], [87141, 87181, 131], [87181, 87325, 132], [87325, 87564, 133], [87564, 90389, 134], [90389, 92340, 135], [92340, 92340, 136], [92340, 92365, 137], [92365, 92365, 138], [92365, 92382, 139], [92382, 92382, 140], [92382, 92399, 141], [92399, 92399, 142], [92399, 92421, 143], [92421, 92421, 144], [92421, 92453, 145], [92453, 92453, 146], [92453, 92485, 147], [92485, 92485, 148], [92485, 92512, 149], [92512, 92512, 150], [92512, 92531, 151], [92531, 92531, 152], [92531, 92556, 153], [92556, 92556, 154], [92556, 92592, 155], [92592, 92592, 156], [92592, 92592, 157], [92592, 92592, 158], [92592, 92627, 159]]}} {"id": "66ffb6b586f949d31828fb4b3a02445965417a79", "text": "## CONTENTS\n\n| TESTIMONY OF: | PAGE |\n|--------------|------|\n| YURI IVANOVICH NOSENKO -- Resumed | 2 |\n\n## EXHIBITS\n\n| EXHIBITS | Marked | Received |\n|----------|--------|----------|\n| JFK F-2 | 10 | |\n| JFK F-3 | 11 | |\n| JFK F-4 | 18 | |\n| JFK F-5 | 24 | |\n| JFK F-6 | 32 | |\n| JFK F-7 | 49 | |\nEXECUTIVE SESSION\n\nTuesday, June 20, 1978\n\nU.S. House of Representatives,\nSelect Committee on Assassinations,\nSubcommittee on the Assassination\nof John F. Kennedy\nWashington, D.C.\n\nThe Committee met, pursuant to recess, at 6:20 o'clock\np.m., in Room 1-D, Headquarters, Central Intelligence Agency,\nLangley, Virginia, the Honorable Louis Stokes (Chairman of\nthe Committee) presiding.\n\nPresent: Representatives Stokes, Preyer, Burke, Fithian,\nDevine and Sawyer.\n\nAlso present: G. R. Blakey, G. Cornwell, M. Goldsmith,\nR. Morrison, E. Berning, M. Jackson, J. Smith, K. Klein and\nS. Brady.\n\nThe Chairman. The Committee will come to order.\n\nAt this time the Committee will resume its sitting. We\nare still in executive session by virtue of the resolution\nadopted by the Committee this past evening.\n\nAt this time the Chair will recognize Mr. Blakey.\n\nMr. Blakey. Off the record.\n(Discussion off the record.)\n\nThe Chairman. Anything further?\n\nBring the witness in.\n\nLet the record reflect that the Committee has resumed its sitting and at this time the witness, Yuri Nosenko, is back before the Committee once again.\n\nMr. Nosenko, I admonish you that you are still under the oath that you took last night.\n\nTESTIMONY OF YURI IVANOVICH NOSENKO -- Resumed\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. And at this time, then, the Committee will recognize the counsel for the Committee, Mr. Klein.\n\nMr. Klein. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nGood evening.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Good evening, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us that after the assassination you had an opportunity to be present when Oswald's file was brought from Minsk, is that right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Absolutely right.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you have an opportunity to read the entire file at that time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. How much of the file did you read?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It was simply looking, page by page, first part of the first volume.\nMr. Klein. You went through the first part of the first volume, page by page?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you go through any of the other volumes?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us that an officer named Matveev took the file away to prepare a summary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you know who wrote that summary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The summary was written by the First Department of the Second Chief Directorate.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you know who, in particular?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, I do not know.\n\nMr. Klein. And did you ever have an opportunity to read the summary that the First Department prepared?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir; I didn't see it.\n\nMr. Klein. The Russian word \"spravka\", does that mean --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Is summary, right.\n\nMr. Klein. And why were you not able to read the summary that they wrote?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, the file was taken in the First Department. I was working in the Seventh Department.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you make any attempt to read it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. Was it at all unusual that with all your\ninvolvement in the case you did not have an opportunity to\nread that file?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It was the decision of the Chief of the\nSecond Chief Directorate, given big importance to this question,\nthat a resume will be prepared by the most prestigious depart-\nment, American Department, and that is why we couldn't even ask.\n\nMr. Klein. You didn't even ask to see it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. So it was not unusual that you were not\nallowed to see it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, it was not unusual.\n\nMr. Klein. You have testified before this Committee that\nthe KGB did not allow Lee Harvey Oswald to defect because he\nwas uninteresting. You have testified the KGB did not even speak\nto Lee Harvey Oswald because he was uninteresting; and that you\ndecided he was not interesting without speaking to him.\n\nDo you know what year Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet\nUnion?\n\nMr. Nosenko. 1959.\n\nMr. Klein. In 1959, approximately how many Americans\nwanted to defect to the Soviet Union or requested permission to\ndefect?\n\nMr. Nosenko. There was a defectionist, I remember, one\nof the employees, one of the workers, who was helping to or-\norganize the American Exhibition in Moscow, Mr. Webster.\nMr. Klein. Without giving particular names, how many Americans would you say asked permission to defect in 1959?\n\nWhat would the number be?\n\nMr. Nosenko. These two were known to me -- Oswald and Webster.\n\nMr. Klein. From 1955 to 1960, what would be your best estimate as to how many Americans asked permission to defect to the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. As far as I heard, there I think was one only.\n\nMr. Klein. One other, meaning three altogether.\n\nMr. Nosenko. One besides Oswald and Webster, what I know.\n\nMr. Klein. Three?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Three.\n\nMr. Klein. Of the three, was Oswald the only one turned down because he was uninteresting?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you know any other defector who was ever turned down because he was uninteresting?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nAllow me to tell, as you have seen, and you told yourselves, how many Americans are defected. It is a very rare occasion and KGB prefers defection when they are planning, they want, these types of defectors, they like and invite those people who can\ngive them certain information which is valuable.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you recall telling this Committee yesterday that up until 1960 the Seventh Department was recruiting left and right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Absolutely right.\n\nMr. Klein. And that you recruited a woman in Utah who was --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I simply had given example of this recruitment which took place up to 1960. When Seventh Department was recruiting and giving files to the Intelligence Service, First Chief Directorate, not asking them before, is it person will be for them valuable or not.\n\nMr. Klein. And that KGB officers were getting bonus and promotions when they induced people to recruit?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. And despite that, Lee Harvey Oswald, when he asked to defect, you turned him down without even speaking to him, to find out if he had any information; is that right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, we had quite a few recruitments in '59, a very big amount of them in '59, very interesting, much, much more interesting -- professors and teachers -- and even was a CO-OP from CIA. We had quite a few recruitments, and Oswald was nothing on this base, on this foundation.\n\nMr. Klein. Would the KGB have any interest in an American student?\n\nMr. Nosenko. As I told you yesterday, KGB interested in\nstudents, but particularly those students who are studying the Russian language, Russian history, Russian economy.\n\nMr. Klein. And would they have any interest in an American who had strong anti-American views and who was a professed Marxist? Would they have any interest in that kind of person?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Here were are coming to a very interesting and sensitive question. From mid-1950, by the order of Central Committee Communist Party, Soviet Union, KGB was prohibited to make any approachment and recruitment of members of the Communist Party of the West.\n\nMr. Klein. I am not asking about a member of the Communist Party.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Your question is, and if he is some type of Marxist here, the question maybe he is possibly a member of Communist Party, and to check it for KGB very difficult if he is a member of Communist Party or not of his country.\n\nMr. Klein. Would they ask him if he is a member of the Communist Party?\n\nWould they check it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, they would not ask him.\n\nMr. Klein. They wouldn't ask him?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. Would the Soviet Union be interested in someone who was in the military and worked with radar equipment?\nMr. Nosenko. It depends. If he was corporal, private, is no big interest. If he was officer, maybe they would be interested.\n\nMr. Klein. The fact that he worked with the equipment wouldn't be enough; they would want to know what his rank was?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir; it is not enough because they had sources.\n\nMr. Klein. And in 1959 would the Soviet Union have been interested in someone who served as a radar operator on an air base where U-2s took off and landed?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir; it would be very interested.\n\nMr. Klein. It is your testimony that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was a student, who was a professed Marxist, who had --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Students? I never heard that he was a student.\n\nMr. Klein. -- who had been a radar operator and had worked on a base from which U-2 airplanes took off and landed, that he wasn't even interesting enough for the KGB to speak to him, to find out if he knew any of this information?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Klein, I understand your position, but we didn't know that he had any connection with U-2 flights. That is one thing.\n\nAnd if you, Mr. Klein, are basing on what was written by Mr. Epstein in the book, it is a little bit from the air taken ideas. Mr. Epstein even telling that how important\nfor KGB to know about such base -- that base. We knew it in '50's when I worked in GRU at the Navy, in 1950, '51, '52. We knew every base and in Japan, at this Atsugi Base, and we knew what kind of airplanes had been. We didn't know about U-2, no. Sure, it is very interesting, but when Oswald applied, requested to stay in the Soviet Union, we didn't know a word about his knowledge, anything concerning U-2 flights.\n\nMr. Klein. And you didn't ask him if he had any kind of information about that when he wanted to defect, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. And you told us that one reason that no one was working on Oswald was because all of your people were concentrating on the American Exhibition in 1959, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. Not only American Exhibition, there were other tourists and among them were interesting targets, very interesting targets.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us yesterday that things didn't --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I can explain you why, because an American Exhibition in Moscow was by the information which KGB had, I don't know how much it's right, how much it's wrong, but it was suspected quite a number of people from American intelligence community who were working on American Exhibition in Moscow, and when the work is going on against such targets,\nit is not one officer, it is a big amount of people involved on each case, because it is very serious target.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you know what date Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, I do not.\n\nMr. Klein. Mr. Chairman, I would ask that this document be marked for identification and shown to the witness.\n\nThe Chairman. Without objection.\n\n(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-2 for identification.)\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at this document --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nThe Chairman. Did counsel want to identify for the record how the document has been marked?\n\nThe Clerk. JFK-F-2.\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at this document, does it say on the top \"Visa and Registration Office, Interior Department, Executive Committee of the Moscow City Council\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you recognize that type of document?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes. It is from Department of giving Visas and Registrations, which is working under auspices of Directorate of Internal Affairs of Moscow City.\n\nMr. Klein. And does this appear to be an authentic\ndocument, an authentic copy of the document?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure.\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at Number 8, does it say what date Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet Union for the first time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. October, 1959.\n\nMr. Klein. October what?\n\nMr. Nosenko. October 16, 1959.\n\nMr. Klein. I would ask that this document be marked for identification, Mr. Chairman.\n\nThe Chairman. Without objection.\n\nWould the clerk indicate for the record?\n\nThe Clerk. JFK-F-3, Mr. Chairman.\n\n(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-3 for identification.)\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at the newspaper article clipping, on the right hand side, with the heading \"U.S. Fair in Soviet Jammed at Close,\" do you see that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. And what is the date of that story?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The date is September 4.\n\nMr. Klein. Are you aware of the fact that the American Exhibition ended on September 4, more than a month before Oswald came to the Soviet Union?\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Klein, I would like you to ask when Americans who were working for this Exhibition left Moscow.\n\nMr. Klein. I will ask you another question.\n\nYesterday, when I asked you if things got back to normal once the fair ended, did you say yes?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, till they were leave the Soviet Union. No. They are the same targets. Okay, you are right, it is closed September 4th, but does it change the importance of these people against whom KGB was working? They were still in Moscow.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you recall yesterday my asking you, did things in your department get back to normal once the fair ended, and do you recall saying yes?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I meaning fair ended when left all the people involved in work on American Exhibition, Americans when they left, and they were staying quite a long time after it was closed. It was closed for visits for Soviet citizens, but it took quite a time for them to leave.\n\nMr. Klein. You also testified yesterday that Lee Harvey Oswald was allowed to stay in the Soviet Union after he said that he was going to kill himself if they sent him home. You told us that he slashed his wrists and two psychiatrists examined him and both found him mentally unstable.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. What was the point of having the two\npsychiatrists examine him?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I think simply to be assured that it was right found decision, concerning this person. Two independent.\n\nMr. Klein. After they examined him, the decision was made to let him stay; is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is not because of the examination he was allowed to stay, Mr. Klein. You are a little bit mixing things. He was allowed to stay because KGB and Soviet Government had come to the conclusion if this person will kill himself it will bereaction in newspapers, which can in any way hurt the starting, the warming of Soviet-American relations.\n\nMr. Klein. The Soviets were worried he would kill himself in the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right, if they would not allow him to stay.\n\nMr. Klein. Could the KGB have taken him and put him on the next plane out of Russia and thereby ended their whole problem with Lee Harvey Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is a very sensitive question. He can jump out of car. If he decided, if he is mentally unstable, you don't know what he will do.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you think the KGB didn't do that because they were worried he might jump out of the car or do something like that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Simply a mentally unstable person, they\ndidn't want to go it on any such action.\n\nMr. Klein. They would rather keep him in the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, they would rather prefer they washed their hands, Mr. Klein; they are not making decision, KGB. In Soviet Union decisions are made by the Central Committee of the Communist Party, and General Secretary and Politburo, not by KGB. KGB a servant of the Politburo and Central Committee Communist Party.\n\nMr. Klein. Going by the facts as you have told them to this Committee --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. -- why wasn't he put on a plane and sent back to America?\n\nMr. Nosenko. KGB washed their hands. Then from Intourist it was given information Ministry of Foreign Trade; Ministry of Foreign Trade reported to the Soviet Government. As I said, I assumed the Chairman was surely asked; he told his opinion of the KGB, and up to the Soviet Government how they would decide.\n\nMr. Klein. Could he have been brought to the U.S. Embassy and told them he is an American, \"You take care of him; we don't want him\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It can be done, sure. It can be done, but it wasn't done.\nMr. Klein. Instead they elected to allow him to stay indefinitely in the Soviet Union and they have to worry about him every single day, what an unstable American would do, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. They didn't allow, KGB didn't allow. Soviet government allowed.\n\nMr. Klein. The facts as you have testified to them are that the KGB allowed this mentally unstable person to stay in Russia, and they sent him to Minsk to live and work in a radio factory. Then the KGB allowed this mentally unstable individual to marry a Soviet woman, and then this mentally unstable individual was allowed to join a hunting club where he had access to a gun.\n\nCan you think of any other cases in all the time you worked in the KGB where a mentally unstable person was treated in this kind of manner?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I told you I do not know any other cases of mentally unstable, excluding one code clerk, American, was also mentally ill; he was delivered in Soviet Union. I heard it. I never have worked with him, I never have seen him. And the thing is, I am sorry, but you are putting and stressing a number of questioning, and it sounds so peculiar. What does it mean, KGB allow him to marry?\n\nMr. Klein, in the Soviet Union there is by degree of Presidium of Supreme Soviet U.S.S.R. a law allowing marriage of\nSoviet citizens with foreign. A foreigner can marry a Soviet citizen, by the law. There is not a thing that KGB can in any way try not to give, not to make it possible, but this is in cases when the person who is marrying a foreigner worked in some sensitive place, let's say, in missiles, rocket industry production, was in process of any place of his working seeing classified material. In these cases, KGB will try to put different type of fences. But it is unlawful. In accordance with Soviet law, marriage is allowed; he doesn't need to ask permission of Soviet Government or anyone. And his wife, Marina, wasn't working in any place which was sensitive from the point of view of Soviet security.\n\nMentally unstable it doesn't mean that he is raving mad; it is mentally unstable.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified that not only was Oswald not spoken to when he first said he wanted to defect but even after the decision was made to allow him to remain in the Soviet Union, still nobody from the KGB spoke to him, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You also testified to the extensive resources that were devoted to put physical and technical surveillance on Oswald. You told us the men involved, the time involved, the facilities involved?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you find great contradiction --\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. -- in the fact that, on the one hand, you put all these resources into following Oswald around, trying to see who he talked to and what he does and, on the other hand, you don't even have a person go and talk to him and ask him, \"Tell us your background; tell us about yourself.\"\n\nIs there any contradiction?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Even in the United States, yes, sure, for you, for me just now American citizens, yes, sure, but there, no.\n\nMr. Klein. They don't talk to people there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. They can talk and cannot to talk, but I don't see contradiction there. Anyone, any foreigner who will be staying, even if this defector not on his own, but, let's say, KGB pushed him to stay, to defect, he still will be watched and on him will be put this same type of work that was put on Oswald, not less.\n\nMr. Klein. You talk about their society is different than ours. Is it unusual that they allow an American to defect and live there without ever questioning him, to ask him if he is an intelligence agent?\n\nMr. Nosenko. On the contrary, no doubt, let's say he was intelligence agent, what he will tell them that he was sent with mission as intelligence agent? Why to scare him? Let him live how he wants. We will be watching him. He\nwill show by his behavior, by his action.\n\nMr. Klein. They purposely don't speak to him; is that your testimony?\n\nMr. Nosenko. In this case they didn't speak with him because he didn't present interest for the KGB and because he was mentally unstable.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified that you read the reports of two psychiatrists who examined Lee Harvey Oswald at the hospital after he cut his wrist, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. You said both found him mentally unstable?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us in great detail how this decision was made to have these psychiatrists examine him.\n\nI would ask that this document be marked for identification.\n\nThe Chairman. The clerk will identify for the record the number appearing on the document.\n\nThe Clerk. It will be JFK-F-4.\n\n(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. P-4 for identification.)\n\nMr. Klein. Have you ever seen that document before?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir. I haven't seen it.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you aware that the Soviet Government\nprovided certain documents to the Warren Commission in 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir. I wasn't aware of this.\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at that document in front of you --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. -- is that a hospital record?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Oh, yes, sure. It is a hospital record.\n\nMr. Klein. And whose hospital record? Does it have a name on it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. It is from Botkin Hospital.\n\nMr. Klein. Whose name is it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Lee Harvey Oswald.\n\nMr. Klein. Does it say what date he was admitted?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Discharged, admitted 23rd, discharged 28th.\n\nMr. Klein. What year is that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. October of 1959.\n\nMr. Klein. And does it have on the bottom the diagnosis why he was in the hospital?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Incised wound of one-third of the left forearm.\n\nMr. Klein. And that date, October of 1959, is that when Oswald first came to the Soviet Union and cut his wrist?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you dates, sir. I do not remember.\n\nMr. Klein. You have in front of you the other document\nwhich told -- Number 8 -- what date he came to the Soviet Union.\n\nIs that still there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir. This is admittance to the hospital and discharge.\n\nMr. Klein. Number 8?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Arrival, October 16.\n\nMr. Klein. And the date on the hospital admittance is what date?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Twenty-third of October.\n\nMr. Klein. And would you turn to the hospital admittance form, the one I just gave you, to the third page, please?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. And do you see where it says \"History of Present Illness\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I don't see.\n\nMr. Klein. On the third page?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I have the third page.\n\nMr. Klein. It has Number 6 on the top of the page, but it's the third page on the document.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Oh, Number 6, History of Present Illness. Yes. Just a second.\n\nMr. Klein. Would you glance through that and would you tell us if this is the hospital report from when Lee Harvey Oswald cut his wrist and was taken to Botkin Hospital?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\nMr. Klein. Now, would you turn to the next to the last page. It has a 13 on the right hand side.\n\nDo you see that page?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. The next to the last page.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. And do you see where it says, two-thirds of the way to the bottom, \"Psychiatric Department\" underlined?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Would you read what is said under that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"His mind is clear; perception is correct; no hallucination or deliriums. He answers the questions legible and logically; he has a firm desire to remain in the Soviet Union; no psychiatric symptoms were noted; the patient is not dangerous for other people; his condition permits him to stay in Psychiatric Department by an order of the Assistant to the Chief Physicians, Dr. Kornika. The patient is transferred to the Seventh Ward.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Is there anything in there to indicate he is mentally unstable?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Here I do not see.\n\nMr. Klein. Does that report indicate that he was normal?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Here I do not see what I have seen. But this you receive from the Soviet Government, and if you think you received the true things, what was in file, you are wrong,\nMr. Klein.\n\nMr. Klein. And that document, according to you, is that not an authentic copy?\n\nMr. Nosenko. KGB can prepare you any document. Take the material, or ask the doctors who are cooperating with KGB and they will prepare you any document.\n\nMr. Klein. I am not asking you what they can do. Are you testifying that this document is not authentic, it is not the document?\n\nMr. Nosenko. This document never was in the file of the KGB.\n\nMr. Klein. So --\n\nMr. Nosenko. This I testify.\n\nMr. Klein. -- it is your testimony that the KGB sent us a phony document?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified before this Committee that there was periodic physical surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald which was ordered by Moscow, to be carried out in Minsk?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. And you testified in detail about that, and you told us how the physical surveillance consisted of following Oswald for a month or month and a half at a time, and there were a number of people that would be involved, is that correct?\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. It was a big operation?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Big operation? No, it's not a big operation.\n\nMr. Klein. There were a number of people involved, weren't there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is not a big operation. It is routine. In KGB it is a routine, nothing serious. It's not an operation even. It's surveillance, it's not an operation.\n\nMr. Klein. And have you ever stated that the only coverage of Oswald during his stay in Minsk consisted of periodic checks at his place of employment, inquiry of neighbors and associates and review of his mail? Have you ever stated that was the only coverage of Oswald in Minsk?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I stated before, and I stated it to you yesterday, and I state now, that the order was given, and I have seen it -- to cover him by surveillance periodical, to cover him by an agent watching in places of his living, places he is working, control over his correspondence and control of his telephone conversations.\n\nMr. Klein. My question is, have you ever stated that the only coverage was checking at his places of employment and his neighbors and associates, and not say anything about periodic, physical surveillance?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I cannot tell you what I stated. I was\nfor quite a big period of time, quite a few years, interrogated, by hours, and in different types of conditions, including hostile conditions.\n\nMr. Klein. That was by the CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Where they asked questions in such form which later my answer will be interpreted in any way, however they want to interrogate us.\n\nMr. Klein. That was by CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. And I cannot tell you what I did say. I cannot remember dates. You must understand, it's hundreds of interrogations, hundreds.\n\nMr. Klein. This period that you are telling us about, you were questioned by the CIA during that period, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sure.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you questioned during that period by FBI?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I questioned by FBI in February, yes.\n\nMr. Klein. At this time I would ask that this document be marked for identification and shown to the witness.\n\nThe Chairman. The clerk will indicate for the record the number appearing on the document.\n\nThe Clerk. Exhibit JFK-F-5.\n\n(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-5 for\nMr. Klein. These hostile interrogations you just alluded to, did they lead you to state other than the truth to these interrogators?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was answering questions which were put to me.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever not tell the truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I was telling the truth.\n\nMr. Klein. I would direct your attention --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Just a moment. Before you you have a Federal Bureau of Investigation report, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. I would direct your attention to page 29 of that report.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. The last paragraph, beginning with, \"Nosenko stated\" -- it's underlined. Would you please read that paragraph to us?\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Nosenko stated that in view of instruction from the KGB Moscow, no active interest could be taken in Oswald in Minsk without obtaining prior approval from KGB in Moscow. According to Nosenko, no such approval was ever requested or granted, and based on his experience, he opined that the only coverage of Oswald during this stay in Minsk\nconsisted of periodic checks of his places of employment, inquiries of neighbors and associates, and review of his mail.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Did you make that statement?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. What do you find here wrong?\n\nMr. Klein. Does that statement say anything about physical surveillance?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, it didn't.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you forget to tell them about the physical surveillance?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Maybe I forget; maybe they didn't put; I do not know.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you recall speaking to agents Poptanich and Gheesling on March 3rd and 4th, 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you. I do remember the date, no. I remember I was speaking with agents from FBI.\n\nMr. Klein. When you spoke to them, did you recall that they spoke to you at that time, March 3rd and 4th, about Lee Harvey Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I told you, they were speaking with me about Oswald, but I cannot tell you the date when.\n\nMr. Klein. Was it in March 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. They were speaking with me -- February and the beginning of March of 1964.\n\nMr. Klein. And did they tape the conversations?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, they were taping all conversations.\nMr. Klein. Did the agents make notes when you were talking?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Did they ever show you those notes?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you aware that the statements you were making to them were going to be written down in to a report?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever have an opportunity to see the report?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. The only one which was sent to the Warren Commission, this I have seen.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you aware that the report would be put in your file?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Must be.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you aware that report would be shown to a committee such as this investigating the assassination?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I didn't know that it would be created, the Committee, because it was 1964.\n\nMr. Klein. You didn't know that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. Did you know that this Committee -- in 1964 -- will be existing in '78, '77?\n\nMr. Klein. And were you telling them the truth when you told them that the only coverage of Oswald, and listing these things and\nnot telling them about the physical surveillance, was that the truth you told them?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I told them that there was done the work against Oswald; it was ordered, passive type of work, it's called passive. Whenever it's ordered not to make an approach, not to make a contact, not to make a recruitment, this is passive.\n\nAnything when enters besides whatever is done, contact, approaches, recruitment, attempt to recruit, it is immediately called active.\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at that report, did you tell them about the physical surveillance which you told this Committee about yesterday?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not see here, but I have no doubts. I do not know. Maybe I didn't mention that this date you said, maybe. I didn't mention but I was telling them about surveillance.\n\nMr. Klein. Didn't you tell us that you always told the truth and told everything you knew when you spoke to the FBI and the CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. If they would have asked you, \"Was there physical surveillance?\" --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, I will answer yes, it was.\n\nMr. Klein. -- you would have answered yes?\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You also testified before this Committee that in accord with the orders from Moscow that there was technical surveillance, and you told us in detail about how they tapped his phone and they would record it and make copies of it and gave it to a certain person.\n\nAgain, drawing your attention to page 29 of that same paragraph, does that say anything about the technical surveillance that you told us about?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you forget?\n\nMr. Nosenko. But, if you ask, even an agent of FBI, I doubt it, no. In KGB control of correspondence, control of telephone, it's not big deal. It's giving order to control a telephone can be given by Chief of Section, not speaking of Chief of Department, not speaking of Chief of Directorate, and not speaking to receive a warrant from the judge. Control of correspondence can be signed, permission to put control over correspondence can be done by the Deputy Chief of Section even.\n\nDo you understand what I want to tell you, it is absolutely considered, KGB, nothing important.\n\nMr. Klein. Is it a big deal to check periodically at someone's place of employment and talk to their neighbors? Is that a big deal?\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. But you told them about that, didn't you?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I tried simply to describe them what kind of, not to take active -- what does it mean, passive type of coverage of the target?\n\nMr. Klein. If they would have asked you was there any technical surveillance, then would you have told them?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I would have said they were told, even word for word, in this document said not the technical surveillance. They have a certain terminology. Let's say surveillance, it's called to lead the measurement N/N, and to control telephone to lead the measurement M.\n\nMr. Klein. If they would have said, \"Was there any technical surveillance of Oswald?\" would you have said \"yes\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure.\n\nMr. Klein. You also testified to this Committee that the KGB would have had to have known about Marina Oswald, you said, by the end of the month they would have a batch of papers?\n\nMr. Nosenko. You told me, if she had seen him, you something mentioned, 15, 13.\n\nMr. Klein. Because surveillance was on Oswald, they would have had to pick her up?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you it was in the moment when\nhe was seeing her or not. You said assume that he met her\n16 and 13, and it became known to KGB through surveillance. I\nsaid by the end of month that at least something will have on\nher, who is she, where she is working, where she studied, where\nshe work.\n\nMr. Klein. They would know that through the surveillance\non Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The fact will be known through surveillance;\nthen through other outfits of KGB they will find whatever\npossible on her.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you ever asked the following question\nand did you give the following answer:\n\n\"Question: Why wouldn't she -- referring to Marina -- have\nbeen investigated when she first met Oswald?\n\n\"Answer: They did not know she was a friend of Oswald\nuntil they applied for marriage. There was no surveillance\non Oswald to show that he knew her.\"\n\nWere you ever asked that question and did you give that\nanswer?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember my questions, and\nanswers.\n\nMr. Klein. I would ask that this document be marked for\nidentification, please, and shown to the witness.\n\nThe Chairman. The clerk will identify for the record\nthe number appearing on the document.\nThe Clerk. JFK-F-6.\n\n(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-6 for identification.)\n\nMr. Klein. Looking at that document, have you ever seen it before?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. You have never seen that before?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I never have seen it before.\n\nMr. Klein. And is that a report that says on the cover, \"Memorandum for the Record; Subject: Followup Report on the Oswald Case; Source: AEDONOR.\" Was AEDONOR your code name at one time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not know.\n\nMr. Klein. \"Date of Interview: 3 July 1964.\" Does it say that on the cover?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. And turning to the very last page, page 18.--\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Does it say, \"Thomas A. Ryan\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. \"SR/CI/KGB\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever hear of a man named Thomas A. Ryan?\nMr. Nosenko. No, I do not know a man Thomas A. Ryan.\n\nMr. Klein. Do you recall speaking to a man named Thomas Ryan?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Would you turn in this document to page 9. On page 9, the last question and answer, would you read the question for us, and read the answer?\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Why wouldn't she have been investigated when she first met Oswald?\"\n\n\"They didn't know she was a friend of Oswald until they applied for marriage. There was no surveillance on Oswald to show that he knew her.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Were you ever asked that question and did you ever --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember, sir. But if it is, it must be asked and I this answered.\n\nMr. Klein. Was that the truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. As far as I remember, those conditions in which I was asked, better ask where I was in this period of time, what conditions I was kept, and what type of interrogations were going on.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you tell us yesterday that you always told the truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. -- when you spoke about Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. Was this question relating to Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was answering what I could.\nMr. Klein. Is that the truth, that they didn't --\n\nMr. Nosenko. It's how it is put, how it is put. You see, again, why wouldn't she have been investigated. Here must be question was in this form. The investigation, not the checkup of her, but, let's say, invitation for conversation, something of this kind, it's some kind of here misunderstanding on both parts, that would be mine, and interrogator.\n\nMr. Klein. It is an inaccurate transcript?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I consider many, many things are inaccurate.\n\nMr. Klein. Is that transcribed accurately?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not know, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. That answer, do you think it is transcribed accurately, that that's your answer?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I can only explain only one thing. Let's say there was KGB found out that he had an acquaintance, Marina Prusakova. They were not married. They didn't know -- they didn't apply for marriage. What kind of first will be investigation? Checkup in archives of KGB of Byelorussia, and on the basis whatever kind of material on her will be found. Let's say, if she was ever on trial by militia, under arrest. If militia had any material, they can expand further. They can also send checkup in the place of her -- one, it's in one order, to give us the picture of the character of the target, check on him in place of his work and check in place of his living,\nin one order.\n\nBut more, farther investigation, the true investigation --\nthis is called checkup -- will be studied and they will start\nwhen they see something, let's say, suspicious in behavior of\nOswald and this his connection.\n\nIn case of Marina, when they found out that they are going\nto marry, sure, they will be more, farther investigation,\nthough investigation; but before it will only be checkup.\n\nFrom this point of view I was answering this question.\n\nMr. Klein. Let me make it simple.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. If the question was asked exactly as it appears\nhere, \"Why wouldn't she have been investigated when she first\nmet Oswald?\" would this be your answer? Is that a correct\nanswer as it appears here?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, it appears here, but I do not remember.\n\nSure, I answered and this was question, but, gentlemen --\n\nMr. Klein. Was this true? This says \"There was no\nsurveillance on Oswald to show that he knew her\" -- is that\nright or wrong?\n\nMr. Nosenko. This is what I answered, yes. It is right.\n\nIt is written here.\n\nMr. Klein. You remember answering that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Klein. How do you know you answered that?\nMr. Nosenko. You are giving me official document.\n\nMr. Klein. You have no recollection of answering this?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not have any recollection of interrogations.\n\nMr. Klein. If you answered that, were you telling the truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I don't know. I answered. Must be. This is how I answered question.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified to this Committee that the KGB decided to have Lee Harvey Oswald examined by two psychiatrists. You told us about how it was decided, who decided it, where it was decided. Then they found Lee Harvey Oswald to be mentally unstable?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. Have you ever been asked the following questions and given the following answers:\n\n\"Question: Did the KGB make a psychological assessment of Oswald?\n\n\"Answer: No, nothing, but at the hospital it was also said he was not quite normal. The hospital didn't write that he was mad, just that he is not normal.\n\n\"Question: Did the hospital authorities conduct any psychological testing?\n\n\"Answer: I don't think so. There was no report like this.\"\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I told that there was opinion of\npsychiatrists that he was mentally unstable.\n\nMr. Klein. Is what I read to you correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not know whether it is correct or wrong. I am answering you what I know.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever make a statement like that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember statements for five years, interrogation.\n\nMr. Klein. I would direct your attention to the Ryan Report.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. Page 7.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. Would you read for us the first and second questions and answers, please.\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Did the KGB make psychological assessment of Oswald?\"\n\n\"No, nothing. But at the hospital it was also said he was not quite normal. The hospital didn't write that he was mad, just that he was not normal, mentally unstable.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Please keep reading.\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Did the hospital authorities conduct any psychological testing?\"\n\n\"I don't think so. There was no report like this.\n\n\"What was the Soviets' opinion of Oswald's personality, what kind of man did they think he was?\"\n\"KGB thought he was of no interest for the country or for the KGB, that he is not normal, that he should leave the country.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Did you say anything in there about two psychiatrists examining Oswald and about reading their reports which said he was mentally unstable? Did you say anything about that there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember what I said to them; but I would like you to find out the conditions in which interrogations were done, how it was done, by what procedures, when two interrogators are seated. I never knew any names -- they never announced me names -- one playing part of bad guy and other good guy, and it starting slapping then, not physically but I mean, psychologically and in conversation, turning question upside down, however they would like, then this leave, another one will start in softer way.\n\nMr. Klein. When did this --\n\nMr. Nosenko. And I would not trust any of their documents in those periods of time. Up to 1967 when we started from the beginning, to work, Mr. Bruce Solie. That is the one thing. Second, my knowledge of language was very poor in '64. I didn't understand many questions, and none of them, excluding Mr. Deryabin, knew Russian language and Mr. Deryabin was asking me only questions concerning my biography and this type of question, but nonoperative questions.\nMr. Klein. Do you have any recollection of being asked these questions and giving the answers that you just read to us?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I told you, and I will tell, I do not remember their questions, and I do not remember my answers; but I tried to be truthful with them. Then was period of time when I have seen that they were simply was laughing at me; I rejected to answer questions, and whenever they were asking, I would answer, \"I do not remember, I do not know, I do not remember.\"\n\nMr. Klein. These answers, do they say \"I do not know, I do not remember\" or do these give responsive answers?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not trust this document prepared by people in those years.\n\nMr. Klein. Is it your testimony that these might not be accurate questions and answers?\n\nMr. Nosenko. My opinion -- I cannot tell you exactly, I say might be.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified --\n\nMr. Nosenko. One more thing: If we are going into this, a number of interrogations, I was under drugs, and on me was used a number of drugs, and I know that, and hallucinations and talking during night and sodium and everything, even many others, and a number of things were absolutely incoherent.\n\nMr. Klein. This hostile interrogation that you have been referring to, when did it begin?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Arrested me 4th of April, 1964, started\ninterrogate me in two days. They interrupted -- I don't know --\ninterrogate a month, two, made break; then again, then again\nperiod of no interrogation; then again interrogations, up to\n24 hours, not giving me possibility to sleep.\n\nMr. Klein. And this was all after April 4, 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThat is why I will not take as a document anything what\nconcerns interrogations in hostile, absolutely hostile,\nsituation.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified in detail yesterday about the\ncable which you saw which was sent from Mexico City to the First\nChief Directorate in Moscow, and you testified that you actually\nread that cable and that it told that Oswald was in Mexico City\nand he wanted permission for visa to come to the Soviet Union.\n\nDo you remember reading that cable and describing it for\nus in detail, how long it was?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever say to anyone that after Oswald\nwent to Minsk, the next time you heard of him was in connection\nwith Oswald's application to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City\nfor a Soviet reentry visa, and you did not know how Mexico City\nadvised Moscow of the subject's application; your knowledge\nresulted from an oral inquiry of your department by M.I. Turalin.\n\nDid you ever say that, that you did not know how Mexico\nCity advised Moscow of Oswald's application?\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember. I am telling you what I have seen, cable, what was told through Lieutenant-Colonel Alekseev to tell to Turalin the opinion of Second Chief Directorate Seventh Department.\n\nMr. Klein. I draw your attention to page 30 of the FBI report in front of you.\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not have it.\n\n(Pause)\n\nYes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. On the top of page 30, read for us the underlined section on the top, beginning \"The next time\" --\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"The next time Nosenko heard of Oswald was in connection with Oswald's application to Soviet Embassy in Mexico City for a Soviet reentry visa. Nosenko did not know how Mexico City advised Moscow of subject's application. His knowledge resulted from an oral inquiry of Nosenko's department by Turalin, Service No. 2, Counterintelligence in Foreign Countries, First Chief Directorate. Nosenko recalled that Turalin had orally contacted Vladimir Alexseev, Chief of Sixth Section of Nosenko's Tourist Department, with respect to Oswald. Nosenko's department had no interest in Oswald and they recommended that Oswald's request for reentry visa be denied. Nosenko couldn't recall when Oswald visited Mexico City in connection with visa application.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever say this to an FBI agent?\nMr. Nosenko. Must be I said it, it's here in document.\n\nMr. Klein. It says in here that Nosenko did not know how Mexico City advised Moscow of subject's application. Did you say that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Must be; I said this in this way.\n\nMr. Klein. And did you tell us that not only did you know how they advised them by cable but that you read the cable?\n\nMr. Nosenko. This is what I recollection.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you tell them the truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was trying to tell what I remembered.\n\nMr. Klein. And this FBI report which you just read from, would you look back on the first page and would you tell us the date of that report?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Fifth of March, 1964.\n\nMr. Klein. March 5, 1964. Is that before April 4, 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. That was before any hostile interrogations began, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Klein. And at that time you said that you did not know anything about the cable, is that right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. This is what I answered them, how I remembered.\n\nMr. Klein, I have a question. Do you understand from what psychological turmoil a person passing who defected, do\nyou understand that it is necessary time, time to settle psycholog- \nically, he doesn't know how he will be living, what he will \nbe doing, and at the same time a person feels attitude on the \npart of those who helped him to come CIA? I felt something \ngoing on.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified to us today that you didn't \nknow how wrote the summary of Oswald's file in the First Depart-\nment because you never had an opportunity to read it. Did you \never tell anyone that Fedroseve and Matveev, F-e-d-r-o-s-e-v-e \nand M-a-t-v-e-e-v of the First Department, Second Chief \nDirectorate, took the file and wrote a second \"spravka\", which \nyou told us was a summary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Summary.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever tell anybody that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Must be I told, it is again right, because \nyou see, not Fedroseve -- Fedroseve was Chief of First Depart-\nment, American Department, and I will repeat what I told you \nyesterday. Matveev has come to take file, but surely Fedroseve \nwho is Chief of American Department, he had given call to Chief \nof Seventh Department. He was involved in this; that is why I \nmentioned him. He was Chief of First American Department.\n\nHis deputy, Colonel Matveev, has come, and not alone; with him \nwas a couple of officers, has come and told that Gribanov \nordered and Fedroseve giving call to Department, we must take \nit, and took. Who of them wrote, I do not know, no doubts that Fedroseve, \nand Matveev were participated in the preparation of documents.\nThey are responsible for First American Department.\n\nMr. Klein. So you have an idea of who would have written, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. American Department, no doubts that this two will be participating or correcting.\n\nMr. Klein. But you didn't read that summary, is that right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember reading the summary.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you read it? Do you have any recollection of reading it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I haven't seen summary.\n\nMr. Klein. Are you positive that you didn't see that summary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I have seen summaries in the file of Oswald.\n\nMr. Klein. Are you positive you didn't see the summary written by the First Department after they took the file away?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember seeing. As I told you, I haven't seen it.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified that Oswald was considered normal prior to the time he cut his wrist, and even told us that you were surprised, you had no indication he would do something like that.\n\nWere you ever asked the following question, and did you give the following answer:\n\n\"In what way was the Oswald case handled differently from cases of other American defectors?\"\n\"Answer: The main difference is that he was not to be allowed to stay. He was considered to be not normal.\"\n\nMr. Nosenko. This is what cases I know, who were staying.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever say that he was considered not normal, referring to the period before he tried to commit suicide?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember; but if I said it, it's not right because we didn't know that he was normal or not normal. Up until the moment of he cut his wrist we started to suspect.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever say that he was considered not normal?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember.\n\nMr. Klein. Well, if you would have said it, would it have been correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, it would not be correct, because he cannot be considered abnormal. We didn't know anything up till he cut the wrist.\n\nMr. Klein. You testified to this Committee that you were present at a meeting with the Chief of the Seventh Department Chief of your section, Major Rastrusin, at that meeting, it was decided that Oswald should not be given permission to defect. You told us where the meeting took place, told us who was there.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us that Krupnov was not even in the\nSeventh Department at that time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Krupnov appeared a little later.\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever tell anyone that on the basis of your evaluation of Oswald, you instructed Krupnov to advise Oswald through Intourist interpreter that Oswald would not be permitted to remain in the U.S.S.R. permanently and that he would have to depart at the expiration of his visa?\n\nDid you ever tell anybody that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember. If I said it, it was wrong, not right, because Krupnov started participation only in this case when Oswald was allowed to stay. In the moment when Oswald arrived in Soviet Union, when he went in hospital, Krupnov was still not in Seventh Department. He very soon appeared later. Then it was wrong. If I stated it, it was wrong.\n\nMr. Klein. Directing your attention to the FBI report in front of you, I would like to draw your attention to page 28.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Klein. Beginning with the underlined section beginning with the first \"On the basis\" in the second paragraph, would you read this?\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Nosenko and Krupnov on the basis of this information, concluded that Oswald was of no interest to the KGB and both agreed that Oswald appeared somewhat abnormal.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Not that, the second paragraph, \"On the basis of\" --\nMr. Nosenko. \"On the basis of Nosenko's evaluation of Oswald, he instructed Krupnov to advise Oswald through the Intourist interpreter Oswald would not be permitted to remain in the U.S.S.R. permanently and that he would have to depart at the expiration of his visa, and thereafter seek reentry as a permanent resident through routine channels at the Soviet Embassy in the United States.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever say that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember saying this. It can be that simply misunderstanding, and, you see, this is not transcription from the tape. It is, I will say a summary, and I do not remember. But, if I said this, it is not right because Krupnov didn't participate it in the beginning.\n\nMr. Klein. Also it says --\n\nMr. Nosenko. It was participation of Rastrusin.\n\nMr. Klein. Also is it correct when it says in there that you made the decision and --\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I couldn't make decision, being Deputy Chief of Section.\n\nMr. Klein. Does it say anything there --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I could say my opinion, yes.\n\nMr. Klein. Does it say anything there about a meeting to determine what to do, or does it say that on basis of your evaluation, you told Krupnov to do it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It's not right. I said only that Krupnov\nappeared later. This period, what we are discussing here, was\nRastrusin involved, decision cannot be done on my own, being\nDeputy Chief of Section, decision cannot be done even being\nDeputy Chief of Section, Chief of Section, at least it\nmust be on the level of Chief of Department.\n\nMr. Klein. So it is incorrect, is that what you are saying?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is incorrect, and Krupnov -- I do not\nremember.\n\nMr. Klein. You told us, when I questioned you about the\nfact that you didn't tell the FBI that there was physical\nsurveillance, the last question I asked you, if they would have\nasked you if he was physically surveilled, would you have told\nthem, and you said yes?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sure. I will say.\n\nMr. Klein. Were you ever asked the following question\nand did you give the following answer:\n\n\"Was he physically surveilled\" and that is referring to\nMinsk, and you answered \"No, there was none\"?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It was not right, because it was order given\nand he was under periodical surveillance.\n\nMr. Klein. I draw your attention to page 9 of the CIA\ndocument in front of you, Memorandum for the Record.\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not have it.\n\nMr. Klein. The Ryan Report. I draw your attention to page\n9.\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Klein. Would you read the first question and the first answer?\n\nMr. Nosenko. \"Was he physically surveilled?\"\n\n\"No, there was none.\"\n\nMr. Klein. Did you ever give that answer to that question?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember; it's not right, the answer.\n\nMr. Klein. I would ask that this tape, which is marked 3 July '64, Reel No. 66, be deemed marked for identification.\n\nThe Chairman. Indicate for the record the marking.\n\nThe Clerk. JFK-F-7.\n\n(The item referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-7 for identification.)\n\nThe Chairman. We will recess for about five minutes.\n\n(A brief recess was taken.)\n\nThe Chairman. The Committee is back in session.\n\nDuring the recess the witness made a request of the Chair that he be permitted to make a brief statement prior to counsel for the Committee resuming interrogation.\n\nThe Chair is going to grant that request and recognize the witness at this time for such statement as he would like to make.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.\nMr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I arrived in the United States in 1964, 12th of February. I felt something was going wrong because the attitude on the part of the officers from CIA who was dealing with me, I felt was going wrong, by a number of remarks, their behavior. Besides, I was in a psychological process. It's a very big thing, when you are coming to live in a new country. I left the country where I was born, never mind, my defection was strictly on ideological basis, but still psychologically is very big thing and very serious thing.\n\nA very short period of time, April 4, I was invited on check-up for the doctor, and this checkup turned to be arrest. Arrested was in very rude form, nobody beat my physically, no, but in rude form, trying to put dignity of the person, of human being, down, kept in very hard conditions. I was smoking from 14 years old, never quitted. I was rejected to smoke. I didn't see books. I didn't read anything. I was sitting in four walls, metal bed in the center of the room and that is all.\n\nI was hungry, and this was the most difficult for me because how I tried not to think about food. I was thinking about food because all the time I want to eat. I was receiving very small amount, and very poor food. I was sitting some kind of attic; it was hot, no air conditioning, cannot breathe; windows -- no windows, closed over. I was permitted to shave once a week,\nto take showers once a week.\n\nFrom me were taken toothpaste, toothbrush. The conditions were really inhuman, conditions in this place; and later transferred in another place, which is now I know where it was, the second place, Camp Perry, where certain house and the same very, very Spartan conditions; three and a half years. Besides that, on me were used different types of drugs and sleeping drugs, hallucination drugs, and whatever I do not know, and don't want to know.\n\nWhat I want to tell you, the arrest was done illegally, without due process of law, without -- in violation of Constitution, which was found by Rockefeller Commission. It wasn't mentioned, my name, but simply nameless defector, who was over three years in extremely Spartan conditions.\n\nInterrogations were done sometimes 24 hours, not giving me an hour to sleep. Interrogations were in very hostile manner. Simply, what I would say were rejected. How long I will be, why it is without due process, no warrants; \"You will be eternally, 25 years.\" How long we would want you to keep. That is why I consider all interrogations, all materials, which concerns this period of time are illegal, and I am not recognizing them and don't want to see them. And I am asking you not to ask questions based on this interrogations, including trying to play the tape during this interrogations. For me it's difficult to return back. I passed through hell. I started new life in\n'69 only because I was true defector. I never raised this question with correspondents. I never went in press, because I am loyal to the country which accepted me, and I didn't want to hurt the country.\n\nI didn't hurt, even to hurt, the intelligence, the CIA.\n\nI didn't consider the whole CIA was responsible. Were responsible several people, for this. Thank God they are not working there anymore. They are out. If I will go in press, if I would be telling about these inhumane conditions, I will hurt not only the agencies, the intelligence service of the U.S.; I will hurt the interests of the U.S. Who would like to defect, reading in what conditions and what treatment defectors is receiving.\n\nSir, I prefer that you be using materials when it was started humane relations with me, which was started at the end of '67. I still was under arrest but I was transferred from the extremely Spartan conditions, and with me started to work Mr. Bruce Solie, who passed through the whole life, through all cases, through everything. People who were talking with me before were coming with what they were told, how to approach to me, how to treat me. They have come with made opinion, before whatever I will say yes or no. That is why I consider it is all unlawful documents in the period of interrogations done by anyone in CIA. up until the end of '67.\n\nThe Chairman. Is there anything further, Mr. Nosenko?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\n(Pages 53 thru 78, being Committee business only, are excerpted.)\nMr. Blakey. Shall I inform the witness?\n\nThe Chairman. In light of the time situation and our original intention of trying to wind up by 10:00 p.m., the Chair thinks perhaps we ought to try and invoke a five minute rule so that everybody gets a fair opportunity rather than to proceed informally and extend this matter over a long period of time.\n\nAnyone have any objection?\n\nAll right, bring the witness in.\n\n(Whereupon, at 8:43 o'clock p.m., the witness returned to the hearing room.)\n\nThe Chairman. Let the record reflect the fact the witness has again returned to the witness table and, Mr. Nosenko, at this time counsel for the Committee has concluded his questions to you and at this point in time the members of the Committee would like to be able to pose questions to you with reference to your testimony here yesterday and this evening. Is that agreeable to you, sir?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. Thank you.\n\nThe Chair at this point would invoke the five minute rule. The Chair will begin the questions.\n\nMr. Nosenko, you are now a citizen of the United States, you are now an employee of the CIA, I understand as a consultant, is that correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. On private contract. I am not an employee\nof the CIA. I am on a private contract, used as a consultant on counterintelligence of the Soviet KGB.\n\nThe Chairman. And in that capacity, sir, are you paid an annual salary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, I am paid an annual salary.\n\nThe Chairman. And what is that salary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. $35,000.\n\nThe Chairman. And --\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is the last year, because it was cost of living.\n\nThe Chairman. I see. In that capacity, do you contract out also to other persons or other organizations?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nThe Chairman. This is your sole income?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Only one sole income.\n\nThe Chairman. Has the CIA given you anything else of value other than a salary, that is, a home, anything of that sort?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir. And in the book published, written by Epstein was mentioned CIA bought me home. No, sir, I bought home on my money, nobody bought me a home, no.\n\nThe Chairman. You also now are remarried and you have --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, I am married. I am American citizen, I have five stepchildren and six grandchildren.\n\nThe Chairman. You now have a passport? Do you have a\npassport as a --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, I have a passport, which I once used being sent by the Agency in 1975, in England, for week where I was talking with British Intelligence and Counterintelligence Services, concerning my knowledge of the Second Chief Directorate, KGB in general.\n\nThe Chairman. Is that the only country to which you have traveled since your defection?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I have traveled on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency also for the last four years. I was in eleven countries. And I never received or demanded or asking any special fees for consultations with all friendly intelligence services, never.\n\nThe Chairman. Have you ever returned to Soviet Russia?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Never once in Soviet Union from 1964 and hope will never see it again.\n\nThe Chairman. And how long have you now been a consultant for CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was from 1969, from April 1969, when I was released from detention arrest.\n\nThe Chairman. Now, will you clarify for us when you first were placed under arrest?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Fourth of April, 1964.\n\nThe Chairman. And on what date had you defected?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I defected 4th of February of 1964 in Geneva,\nSwitzerland.\n\nThe Chairman. And when you were placed under arrest, where were you placed in detention?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not know, it was somewhere around Washington, close to Washington, where I was '64 and beginning '65, approximately. I don't hear any radio, I didn't see any newspaper, I do not know, didn't know anything what happen in the world for many years.\n\nI know that it was by car from Virginia where I was staying from 12 of February '64, I was taken by car for visit to doctor, and it was 30, 40 minute drive, it was in this area, but then in approximately after a year and maybe 13 months, a year and one month, roughly, I was transferred in very peculiar conditions, was put under shackles and handcuffs, blindfolded, put in the car, and don't know where I was going, only I heard, passing through city, I couldn't understand, I couldn't see anything, then I heard airplanes, I understood that I was somewhere in airport, and once I was scared to death, I think I was thinking they were returning me to the Russians. Well, they put me in airplane --\n\nThe Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, my time has expired. I want to recognize --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not know the place, sir. I know I only now found out reading the book of Daniel Schorr that I was in Camp Perry up to the end of '67. That is what I found out from\nthe book.\n\nThe Chairman. Thank you.\n\nMr. Preyer.\n\nMr. Preyer. Mr. Nosenko, one thing that comes through very strongly in your testimony is that it is a hard life to be a defector. I think to the average mentality we think it would be good for a country to welcome a defector, but to the intelligence mentality apparently a defector is immediately suspect, and you have recounted your treatment here, and apparently Lee Harvey Oswald, from your testimony, was greeted somewhat like this in the U.S.S.R. His treatment was much different from yours.\n\nOne thing he was not an intelligence agent, of course. But you have indicated that he was kept at arms' length by the KGB. The impression I get was the mere fact of being a defector caused the KGB to be less interested in him than if it was someone they had recruited?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Preyer. Although he was kept at arms' length by the KGB, in the sense that he was not contacted, it does appear that he lived very well there, relatively speaking. He certainly lived much better than you lived in your early years. That he was given a job in Minsk, he was given a pension, which is something that seems extraordinary in this country, from the Red Cross, and apparently pretty good housing conditions\nin Minsk.\n\nIs that typical way that a defector would be treated in Russia, is at arm's length?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Every defector will be watched but, sir, when you mentioned what he received being in Russia, it is very little. I can give you only one example. When defectors Martin and Mitchell, employees of NSA, who cooperated with KGB abroad, and then they defected to Soviet Union, they received extraordinary help. It is not like Oswald. Oswald is nothing.\n\nMr. Preyer. The amount of money?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The amount of money and other things, extraordinary.\n\nMr. Preyer. For Oswald were not extraordinary?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Preyer. You mentioned the other three defectors that you had known of. What sort of treatment did they receive?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I will tell you what Martin and Mitchell --\n\nMr. Preyer. Were they two of the other three?\n\nMr. Nosenko. These two, for example. I can mention others, what I heard, I never work with them, what I heard. Martin and Mitchell, by decision of Soviet Government was given them, to each one, $100,000 on their account, was given apartment, not like Oswald received, but real good apartment, so-called classless society, living high class. Each one was given car, each one received life pension a month of 5000 Soviet rubles\nup to death. And each one was helped with work. Both were\nassigned with some type of research work where they had given\nposition, let's say Martin was given position of researcher.\nBut amount of pay of his was analogical to the amount of pay\nof the Director of this Institute, besides what he is\nreceiving of pension. This is the treatment of those defectors\nwhom they want, who had given them valuable information.\n\nIn case of -- excuse me -- was Annabella Bucar defected\nsomething early '50s. She was working in American Embassy in\nPress Department. She also received, in spite of the fact\nwas making very good money in the Soviet Union, she was working\nfor Moscow Radio, she was receiving life pension of big amount,\namount approximately what in Soviet Union is received by Deputy\nof Minister, of Ministry, of this or that industry.\n\nMr. Preyer. But the defector who was not giving informa-\ntion?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Now, he will be given a little bit something,\npension like was Oswald, to Oswald given pension. I don't\nknow what was given to Webster, a worker, who was defected in '59\nand by the way, in very short period of time he decided he\ndoesn't like the life in the so-called Soviet paradise. He\nwanted to return back home, but if he received it will be\nanalogical to what Oswald received, not more.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Devine.\nMr. Devine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nWere you solicited to be a defector?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir. No, sir.\n\nMr. Devine. Why did you defect?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I defected because I for years of my life has come to number of conclusions that the whole society, the whole system, is dictatorial system, nondemocratic system, the true police state system, and especially working the KGB opened eyes for me. My defection was strictly on ideological basis.\n\nMr. Devine. Had you been out of the Soviet Union prior to your defection?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Devine. Other than to Geneva?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, I was in England twice, then I was passing through a number of countries, staying day, two, France, Belgium, Holland. I was in 1960 in Cuba.\n\nMr. Devine. You were a married man in Russia?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Devine. Had a child?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, two daughters.\n\nMr. Devine. Were you having some domestic difficulties?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I tried in 1960-'61, I tried to arrange to go to work abroad with my family, and in the last moment it fell down, and I understood I cannot go abroad with family,\nand that is why when I contacted CIA in '62, I -- psychologically\nI was ready, ideologically was ready and psychologically ready\nto defect, but the question of family was bothering me.\n\nMr. Devine. But not enough to keep you there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Not enough to keep me there. And in '64\nI has come knowing that I will never return.\n\nMr. Devine. You were willing to abandon your family?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, because I didn't see possibility\nto take family out. I was living the last four or five years\nas a man with two souls, splitted personality, one I must show\nand was showing, as good KGB officer, as a good Communist, as\na patriot of the Soviet system, the Soviet Union, and the other\npart of me, the true part I am not believing in what I am\ntelling, I am not believing in the system, I do not like it,\nI do not want it, and I consider what phony things are going\non because I was working in KGB, I knew it. I simply couldn't\nmore tolerate to be with this double splitted personality.\n\nMr. Devine. How did you dispose of your children and your\nwife in Russia?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The thing was psychologically, my had, had\nin my mind. help me. My mother was rather rich, after death of\nfather, she was very rich woman and she had a lot that will be\nenough not only for my children but their children and grand-\nchildren. From the point of view of material they will never\nsuffer.\nMr. Devine. Yes, but as a defector would there not be reprisals taken by the Soviet Union against your family?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, before the death of Stalin it could be taken drastic measures against the family, but after the death of Stalin, from middle 1950s, quite a little changes took place in the Soviet Union, and the family will not suffer.\n\nAnother thing, oh sure, will be certain things which they cannot achieve. Let's say my brother who studied later in the same Institute what I finish, Institute of International Relations, he will never have possibility to go abroad, but he will never be put in jail, can never be exiled from Moscow, the same, nothing happened with family.\n\nMr. Devine. The fact that you were a KGB man didn't your defection cause some irritation among those in power over there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure.\n\nMr. Devine. Did they want to get you back, didn't they want to get even with you?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Oh, yes, and they are looking for me.\n\nMr. Devine. But they took no reprisals against your family.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Devine. How do you know that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I do not know exactly, but you see, there were some defections before. The family didn't suffer like it was, let's say, in '40s and maybe up to death of Stalin.\n\nMr. Devine. Were those KGB defections?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Even from KGB.\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMrs. Burke?\n\nMrs. Burke. Well, I would like to go back a little bit after you decided to defect. I think you had a number of conversations with the American Embassy, was it, or was it CIA, during those ten days that you were in touch, where you negotiated whether or not you would in fact defect?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I contacted CIA in '62 and --\n\nMrs. Burke. In '64?\n\nMr. Nosenko. In '64, when I arrived in Geneva, on second day I mailed a cable, and I knew -- a prearranged addressed, and I knew that in two days somebody in appropriate place and appropriate time will meet me from CIA.\n\nMrs. Burke. And they met you --\n\nMr. Nosenko. They met me and I was meeting them every day, visiting, and when I had free time, visited secret address in Geneva.\n\nMrs. Burke. All right, during those times you were meeting them, did you negotiate in terms of what your situation would be here in the United States if you defected, or where you would go?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I put a question that what amount of salary I want, that will find for me job. This I negotiate.\n\nMrs. Burke. Did you discuss whether or not you would be imprisoned?\nMr. Nosenko. No, it never come to my mind that they would imprison me.\n\nMrs. Burke. Did you tell them that -- I think you told us you had some information you would well to them for a certain amount of money.\n\nMr. Nosenko. It's in '62.\n\nMrs. Burke. In '62 you said that. In '64 you didn't discuss any sale of any information?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, on the contrary, for the period of '62 -'64, I tried to get as much as possible information, not only to come what I knew where I participated in the department where I worked but to find out as much as possible what can be valuable to the American intelligence and I had come with some luggage.\n\nMrs. Burke. All right, well, during the time that you were talking to them about what your salary would be, the circumstances of your defection, and I assume you told them what your rank was, some of the things you worked on --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. -- did you tell them you worked on the Oswald file?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not remember, I can mention. I do not remember, honestly.\n\nMrs. Burke. Did you discuss Oswald at all with them during that period?\nMr. Nosenko. I must, sure, mentioned this fact because, no, it happened such a thing. I must mention. But I do not remember. I cannot tell you what questions were, what my answers were.\n\nMrs. Burke. Did you tell them that the Soviet Union thought that Oswald may have been a United States agent?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, I certainly -- it would be -- anyone treated. Oswald, or anyone from the United States who come to live on his own decided to defect, or they contacted him before, they will still will be suspected in a possibility that he is an agent of American intelligence, and also this fact.\n\nMrs. Burke. And is this the reason that you gave him why he was not allowed to remain in the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. The reason was that they didn't want him to stay because, KGB, because they didn't consider him an interesting target, an interesting person who has valuable information.\n\nMrs. Burke. I know that. In fact, I remember you saying something about a person would only be interesting under certain circumstances, one of which would be if they came in as a tourist and they applied a very short time before they arrived.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Oh no.\n\nMrs. Burke. And they were an add on to, for instance, the tour.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right. Right.\n\nMrs. Burke. Now, from what that report shows, it shows that\nOswald received his visa in two days to come to the Soviet Union. So he would be automatically suspect, and he would be automatically what you would call an interesting person.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, no. In this case, you see, Oswald even didn't receive a visa in United States; he received it passing through Europe.\n\nMrs. Burke. Through Helsinki?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right, in Finland, where it's process was easier than it will be in the United States. He simply bought a tour and he received, managed to receive visa.\n\nMrs. Burke. Let me just ask one other thing.\n\nDid you tell them any of your, aside from the ideological, why you wanted to defect? For instance, did you tell them anything about this promotion you thought you had when you went to, was it, Gorki?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. But then you --\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I didn't tell them. I simply said that my position, because with me, it was documented, I lied. I said my position was Lieutenant Colonel. It wasn't true. It was false statement. The same false statement was concerning recall telegram when I wanted to push the defection process.\n\nMrs. Burke. My time is up. May I just ask one question? Were you upset when you didn't get your promotion after they had --\nMr. Nosenko. No, no ma'am. I still didn't receive it. It was sent on signature. You see, they are signing, not immediately when they are received. Personnel Directorate gathering from all over the Soviet Union, from all KGBs and comment on signature to the Chairman, twice, three times a year. They were simply gathering in and didn't get enough materials. I do not know. Maybe it was signed in January. But up to my leaving, nobody informed me that it was signed. I didn't -- wasn't rejected.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.\n\nMr. Dodd?\n\nMr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nI wonder if you might let me ask you -- let me start back here, very quickly. One of the very first questions you were asked last night by Mr. Klein, was the way Mr. Klein worded the question, and I will ask you to expound on it if it is a correct recall on my part.\n\nMr. Klein asked you or stated that you arranged for your transfer to the American section of the KGB. He used the words you arranged for your transfer to that section. Is that an accurate statement? Did you want to be in that section? Did you specifically ask to be in that section?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, it wasn't accurate, it wasn't right.\n\nArrangement was done in work form. I was working after finishing Institute in GRU, Navy Intelligence, and being in 1952 New Year,\nin Moscow on New Year on a short leave, I was in company where it was one of my friends with whom I studied at the Institute. He worked in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But his father-in-law was high ranked General of MGB, in those years was called KGB, and he asked me what I am doing, this General.\n\nI said that I am working for the Navy Intelligence, GRU.\n\nDo you like this work?\n\nI said no, because I am not using what I received education.\n\nWould you like to work in MGB?\n\nI said, if it will be with the use of my disciplines which I studied at the Institute, why not? That is all. And in March after death of Stalin this general was appointed the First Deputy Minister of MGB of Beria. He remembered this conversation and several days after death of Stalin I was recalled to MGB which was called MVD in this period of time, in March of '53, and was assigned to Second Chief Directorate. This is what true statement.\n\nMr. Dodd. When you sent to the safe house or whatever it was in Geneva, in 1964, by your own admission you lied to the agent there in that you stated you had received a telegram issuing your recall back to the Soviet Union.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Dodd. Therefore, it was that important that they accept you immediately.\nDid you show anyone a telegram?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir; no, sir. There wasn't any telegram.\n\nMr. Dodd. Did they ask for a telegram?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, but, sir, what happened, I started to meet them in January, had passed three, four, five, six, seven days. I am afraid of that any moment my Chief of the Second Chief Directorate will be returning from France.\n\nMr. Dodd. I didn't ask you that, Mr. Nosenko. My question to you is, were you asked whether or not you had a copy of the telegram that you had received from the Soviet Union?\n\nMr. Nosenko. And I -- if I was even asked I couldn't give them because I cannot take it. It would be secret cable.\n\nMr. Dodd. You have answered my question.\n\nYou stated last night that -- and this might have been a supposition on your part, but I am curious about it -- you stated that it was your feeling that the intelligence community in this country considered you a dispatched agent in 1962. Is that something that you felt in 1962?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. It's --\n\nMr. Dodd. A reflection back?\n\nMr. Nosenko. A reflection back. No, no, sir.\n\nMr. Dodd. You, by your own statement, again have received some very rough treatment, inhuman treatment, to use your words, living under spartan conditions, and I am sort of brushing over\nthis very quickly, between 1964 and 1969. Certainly you\ncouldn't have been very pleased with the way you were being\ntreated by a country that you had defected to and offered to\ngive information to. So for a period of that '64, to '69,\nfive years, you went through a rather rough period in your life?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Dodd. Why did you go to work for somebody who treated\nyou like that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I, even was five year there, I didn't\nconsider that it was decision of the whole CIA. I didn't\nconsider that -- I didn't blame the whole CIA because it\nwasn't the question decided by the whole Agency. It was\ndecided question by several persons who were I consider simply\nin this period of time sick, mentally sick, not ill, but\nwere simply in fear, in scare, in mania as if KGB penetrated\neverything.\n\nMr. Dodd. Is it your statement to me that for five\nyears, while you were incarcerated in almost solitary confine-\nment, that you thought that this was the individual acts of a\ncouple of employees of this Agency?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Not employees.\n\nMr. Dod. Without the approval of the very highest\nauthority in this Agency?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I have seen Chief of Soviet Russia\nDivision, Mr. David Murphy. He was a high ranking man. It was\nhis decision, decision of Mr. Angleton, decision of Mr. Murphy, and when they are coming to Director, and I know, from my life, they can report in the way how they will report it, and the Director will accept because they are responsible people, they are sitting in this place. He is not going into details, he is not going and studying, he is not going himself visiting. The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Sawyer?\n\nMr. Sawyer. First, have you received any compensation for the period during which you were held in jail?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I received in several years later, I put the question, I want to be paid for every year which I was unlawfully arrest, the amount of money which we have agreed, with taken taxes and whatever American citizens are paying.\n\nMr. Sawyer. Did you get that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, and on this sum of money I bought the house.\n\nMr. Sawyer. I see.\n\nI will tell you what bothers me about your testimony, very frankly. You stated that they would be very interested in a member of the American intelligence community that they could even compel to defect. Here you had a willing defector, a guy who said that undoubtedly that he didn't like America, and that he did like Russia, and he wants to defect, and nobody even interrogates him, according to you, as to what exposure or\nexperience he had. He might have worked in the missile silos, he might have done anything, but nobody asked him, and that he lives there for a period of, a long period of time. Here is a guy that is totally willing to talk. It is not like approaching somebody who doesn't want to talk to you or that might not want to talk to you. And here is a fellow who was a radar operator, experienced to some degree, and I don't know to what degree, but apparently the Russians don't know to what degree either, because nobody asked him, in a highly secret air base in Japan, but they didn't ask him even about that, and it is very rare to have one come.\n\nI have listened to Radio Free Cuba, where they air all kinds of propaganda, and this guy would have been certainly good for propaganda when he loved Russia and hated the United States. And I just, with those circumstances, I very frankly find it almost impossible to believe that they did not thoroughly interrogate him at least.\n\nMr. Nosenko. They never considered him an interesting target. It was known that he served in Marine Corps.\n\nMr. Sawyer. What I am getting at, how did they know whether he was an interesting target when they never even asked.\n\nMr. Nosenko. They judging by what they know about him what in questionnaire he filled and plus what they found out from interpreter on him. He said to interpreter, he served in Marine Corps, he finished his years of service.\nMr. Sawyer. But he might have been a cryptographer in the Marine Corps. He might have been as an enlisted man, he might have been a cryptographer and know all our codes and code methodology that might help break codes and that sort of thing, but nobody ever asked him. That is what I don't understand. And I can't believe it, very frankly.\n\nMr. Nosenko. I understand, sir, but I am telling you he wasn't considered interesting target, and --\n\nMr. Sawyer. But they didn't have any facts to know whether he was interesting, and here is a guy that wants to talk to them.\n\nMr. Nosenko. But the judgment made on each person to work actively against him on the basis of his questionnaire. If in questionnaire will be said he is, let's say, professor, teacher, let's say he is working for the government, any department, but for the Federal Government, or he is an officer sure, on him will be paid attention.\n\nMr. Sawyer. Well, all right, we can drop that for a minute.\n\nBut now, he got a visa in two days in Finland. I happen to have been in Finland four years ago and wanted to get a visa, a sort of a last minute decision, to go to Leningrad, and I was told there is a minimum of 30 days before you can get a visa. Now, to issue him a visa in two days for Russia, that is very unusual, apparently, so they must have had some\ninterest in getting him there.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, what I know, there wasn't any interest\nto get him. He managed to get this visa.\n\nMr. Sawyer. All right.\n\nThe other thing I am curious about is when they interrogated\nyou so carefully here, why someone like Oswald, a known defector\nand who could well have been now a Russian intelligence agent,\ncomes back to the country, apparently CIA or FBI, or nobody\npaid a bit of attention to him, and let him wander around the\ncountry with a Russian wife at will.\n\nI have used up my time.\n\nThe Chairman. Okay. The time of the gentleman has\nexpired.\n\nMr. Fithian.\n\nMr. Fithian. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nMr. Nosenko, as I piece it together, there are four\npossibilities for this Committee to believe. Let me sketch\nout what those possibilities are.\n\nOne, that you told the truth in 1964, but you are now\nmisleading this Committee.\n\nTwo, that you told an untruth in 1964, basically your\nstatements in 1964 were not true, but you are telling the truth\nnow.\n\nThree, that in fact you were dispatched here by the KGB,\nor the Soviet Government, because of apparent but unreal\nconnections between the Soviets and Oswald and the assassination of President Kennedy. Obviously the USSR would need this for obvious reasons. They would badly need this for all sorts of international reasons.\n\nAnd finally, the fourth option is that you were dispatched here by the Soviet Government and the KGB because there was an actual connection between the KGB and the assassination of President Kennedy.\n\nThese are the items which I have picked up in the last two days that would tend to lead some people to believe the last of the four, or at least the third to the last of the four, either that the KGB dispatched you here because they needed it for political reasons, though they were not involved, or they dispatched you here because in fact they did collaborate with Oswald.\n\nFirst, Oswald goes to Russia. You say he is rejected, but they grant him a pension, however small.\n\nSecond, they grant him the pleasures of a hunting club, even though you said earlier he was mentally unbalanced, and you are allowing him to use a gun.\n\nThree, they allowed him to marry in Russia.\n\nFour, they gave him a job.\n\nNow, in -- not talking about the time when you were under stress and incarcerated, but just talking about the two months prior to that -- the FBI questioning, and the prearrest\nstory makes no sense.\n\nThe rejection of Oswald's offer to defect makes absolutely no sense to me.\n\nMr. Sawyer has just pursued that momentarily. I think that can be rejected by us, by reasonable people, prima facie. I see no reason to accept that part of your story whatsoever.\n\nThe exposition, taking you off to worry about the exposition, and so forth, was demonstrated a fraud.\n\nNo reprisals against your family. Nobody was working against Oswald, you said, yet later on you said you had seven to eight large files, you only read the first portion of one file. You said no KGB ever talked to Oswald regarding letting him defect. The reason you gave us for that was that he slashed his wrists and you concluded he was unstable. Yet prior to that discovery of his instability, you granted him a visa in two days and he asked to be permitted to defect prior to slashing his wrists, and therefore you had to make the decision prior to slashing his wrists, prior to knowing that he slashed his wrist, that you were going to reject him. That doesn't hold water either.\n\nFinally, you said in your testimony American defection was very rare. All the more reason, if it only happens once every year or a couple of times a year, or three times between '56 and '59, it is totally incredible to me that he would not have been interrogated. No reasonable person can believe that story.\nYou said he was not interesting, you were not interested in him, the KGB rejected him. Despite that, you were \"recruiting right and left all kinds of people to assist in the espionage operation.\"\n\nNow, all of these things, Mr. Nosenko, leads me to be very, very disturbed by your story because it simply just on the face of what you told us last night and tonight, can't possibly be true.\n\nIn the first place, you remember too much now. You remember too much in the way of details after 15 years. Therefore, I have great difficulty accepting any of your story.\n\nWe as a Committee of the United States Congress are charged with trying to assess what actually happened in the assassination of President Kennedy. That is the central story. You have not helped us very much. You have confused the issue. In fact, by your testimony you have led at least this member to wonder whether or not you are still working with the KGB.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nI will permit the witness to answer.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Congressman said his opinion. Do you ask me any question?\n\nMr. Fithian. I would just like to have you tell me why I shouldn't believe that you were dispatched here by the KGB, in the light of just the points I am making, in the light of the enormous differences, not in the CIA interrogation under\nduress, but in the earlier period when you were not under that kind of duress. It doesn't wash with me.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, if you want me to defend myself, I can say only one thing. I never done from the first day in the United States anything directed against this country. I tried before I has come, when I contacted '62 the CIA, and has come in '64, I tried to get as much as possible information. I am the source who told concerning existence of microphones in American embassy in Moscow. I am the man who have given, I don't know, 300 cases --\n\nMr. Fithian. We are only concerned --\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Edgar.\n\nMr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nIt is very hard to follow Mr. Fithian's comments because I would like to shift gears a little bit. BUT you indicated to our Chairman that you now act as a consultant to the CIA.\n\nIs that your only job?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is the only job.\n\nMr. Edgar. In the course of acting as consultant to the CIA, do you have access to talking with CIA employees from time to time who contact you and who assist you and protect you and give you some of the direction for your consulting?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\nMr. Edgar. Have you ever been in a conversation with any of the agents of the CIA about who might have been responsible for having you detained on April 4th, 1964?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Edgar. -- 1964.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Edgar. You indicated earlier you thought it was a man by the name of Murphy.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Murphy, Chief of Soviet, former Chief of Soviet Russian Division, and Chief of Counterintelligence, former Chief of Counterintelligence of the CIA Mr. Angleton because it cannot without him be decided.\n\nMr. Edgar. Do you know of any other KGB agents or other defectors who were held in those very same conditions?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I do not know.\n\nMr. Edgar. Were there any other prisoners held nearby that you could hear or --\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, I was in solitary absolutely confinement, no prisoner, nobody I could see.\n\nMr. Edgar. Yet you are still willing to be a consultant to the CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I am -- no. Sir, I am consultant only on the base, on my knowledge what I know about counterintelligence work of the KGB.\n\nMr. Edgar. Well, you have suggested to the Committee that your statements given to the CIA in 1964 cannot be considered\nreliable because the statements were given under duress, and\nprior to our recess a few moments ago you indicated that you\nfelt that the tapes and the FBI and the CIA interrogations of\n'64, '65, and '66 should not be considered as reliable\nstatements.\n\nIs that not correct?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, because I considered the whole arrest\nwas unlawful, without due process of law, illegal arrest,\nwhat was the finding as unlawful by Rockefeller Commission.\n\nMr. Edgar. Thank you.\n\nYou were held under those spartan conditions and you\nindicated that those statements would have to be unreliable.\n\nNow, I have three specific questions, then, to ask you.\n\nHave you ever told the CIA that these statements could\nnot be considered reliable?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure, when we started, they change the\nsituation, they moved me from spartan conditions, started to\ntalk with me as a human being, to treat me as a human being.\n\nMr. Edgar. Did you go on a point by point correction of\nany of those statements you previously made?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It wasn't in the form of simply returning\nto document, it was case by case, whatever concerns me, my\nbiography, my work, whatever cases I knew, whatever cases I\nwas involved, all questions were raised by 20, 30 times each\ncase, when it was reevaluation of all information given by me.\nMr. Edgar. And it is your testimony that after 1967, '68, when those interrogations took place, you gave accurate, truthful statements?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, whatever and how good I recollect, at the best.\n\nMr. Edgar. And those statements of '67-'68 should be considered by this Committee as the absolute truth?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Edgar. And nothing but the truth.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, yes, sir.\n\nMr. Edgar. And it is clear to you that all the questions that were raised about Oswald were also raised in 1967 and '68?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Everything was raised in this period.\n\nMr. Edgar. If, then, this Committee discovers inconsistencies in your statements that you made in 1967 and '68, after your incarceration and the illegal period that you talk about, if we find inconsistencies between that statement and the statements you gave us last night and tonight, which should we believe?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, if -- you must believe -- not you must it is up to you what you believe. But, sir, let's say was read to me by Mr. Klein a question, that I said when I said concerning Oswald, I did not mention physical surveillance. It is a big operation. It is nothing big in the KGB to put under surveil-\n\nance Soviet or foreigner, or to control telephone conversations\nor correspondence. I could maybe something miss, you see, when I mentioning. I do not have such a brilliant, brilliant mind that immediately like photographic memory, immediately return word and word. I simply was describing that it wasn't active work, that there wasn't planned recruitment, there wasn't planned approachment, contact. There was type of passive work which is called in KGB to watch him and what is it, agents, control of correspond\u00e9nce, and explaining this, I simply, I could miss that he was under surveillance.\n\nYou can return to this and tell me, uh-huh, you told in '67 you didn't mention that he was under surveillance. It is not a contradiction.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Nosenko, in reply to Mr. Sawyer's question, you indicated you were paid for the period of time that you were under arrest, that it was a lump sum payment I suppose?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. What amount of money was that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Something about, oh, about $80,000.\n\nThe Chairman. About $80,000?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nThe Chairman. Any other sum in addition to that were you paid?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I think I received about $15,000 or $20,000 when I started on my own to live, to buy furniture. I received,\nyes, in the beginning, in '69, in April. But this lump I received in '70, '71. '71.\n\nThe Chairman. So that the record is clear, you received $80,000 for the period of time you were under arrest.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nThe Chairman. In order to get started again, you were given an additional $15,000, and that was in '69.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nThe Chairman. Since 1969, to the present time, you have received $35,000 --\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, no, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. Would you --\n\nMr. Nosenko. They started, when they released me they started to pay me in the beginning $16,000. Then they raised each year, $2000, two and a half thousand were raises. I only received $35,000 this year, '78, from October of '77, approximately.\n\nThe Chairman. From October '77 to the present time you received $35,000.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nThe Chairman. Can you give us some indication of how many days you have worked during 1978?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I am working at home besides coming here when they need me, at least twice a month, and spending a week, approximately, besides traveling when they are\nsending me the last few years abroad to talk with friendly\nintelligence services. I am also working at home on my own.\nI am studying Soviet periodicals, Soviet magazines, Soviet\nnewspapers. I am making certain researches, I am trying not to\nlose what is going on, what changes taking place in policy.\n\nThe Chairman. Would it be fair to say that you sort of\nset your time and that no one else sets your time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. When I am out of this area, yes, at home,\nI am myself setting time.\n\nThe Chairman. And during the last year, how many weeks\nwould you say you have spent here at the Agency?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Not at the Agency. They are meeting me in\nother places. I am very rare visiting this place, only if they\ninvite me for a lecture or about KGB counterintelligence. But\nI am meeting them when I am in this area, under certain\nconditions, in certain places where they need me.\n\nWell, one monthly, twice I am coming. Let's say I am\nspending about 12, 13 days a month here, it can be in some\ncases seven, eight days a month, but in main the last period\nof time I am coming, the last years, I am coming almost\ntwice a month.\n\nThe Chairman. For how long?\n\nMr. Nosenko. For a week, five, six days.\n\nThe Chairman. My time has expired.\n\nMr. Preyer?\nMr. Preyer. Mr. Nosenko, your testimony has been considered a major piece of evidence, and was so considered by the Warren Commission as rebutting any Russian connection with the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald, and I think the key part of your testimony that we are concerned with, not so much the question about any inconsistencies in it, but are you right on the big question, namely, was Lee Harvey Oswald a KGB agent?\n\nI want to mention, I have been a little surprised by your testimony, by the gaps in your knowledge of Oswald, and really how little you knew about him. For example, when he went to Minsk, he was transferred out of your oversight, I take it, and as I understood you, you did not know he was married until later on, and did not know he had gone back to the United States.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Congressman, if I was staying and working '60 and '61 period in the same Seventh Department which sent file on Oswald in Minsk, I would know, but I was working in First American Department.\n\nMr. Preyer. Right. Now, I am not questioning you about that. The question I wonder, that that brings to my mind is, if Oswald had been a KGB agent, are you certain you would have known it? In other words, if you didn't even know he was married, didn't even know he had gone to the United States, couldn't he have been a KGB agent in that period without your knowledge, or are you certain --\nMr. Nosenko. No, I couldn't, you are absolutely right, I couldn't know. But in '63 when happened assassination of the President, when it was mentioned that Oswald shot the President, when it start, demanded the file back from Minsk, when started conversation with Minsk, started in KGB investigation, detailed approach. This is what --\n\nMr. Preyer. So you convinced that seeing the first section--\n\nMr. Nosenko. Seeing the first section in which the most important material in the whole file will be this in first section of the first volume.\n\nMr. Preyer. Were the rest of the sections of that file, incidentally, wire -- telephone taps?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It will be information from agents in second part. In third part will be from telephone conversations, from surveillance. In fourth part, photocopies of letters, different mail, when they checking Soviet connections, Soviet friends of Oswald.\n\nMr. Preyer. Well, on this question of your knowledge of Oswald and being in position to know about him, you knew about the cablegram from Mexico yet you did not know he had gone back to the United States. Is that because you had moved to--\n\nMr. Nosenko. Again, I returned in Seventh Department and I was working '62, '63, up to '64 in Seventh Department and the cablegram has come in Seventh Department. Seventh Department was started against Oswald in '59.\nMr. Preyer. Have you read a lot about the Oswald case in recent years?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, I read several books, what appeared. I only didn't read the last book which was written about Marina Oswald by Mrs. Priscilla Johnson. Why? Because I knew that I would appear here, that the staff of your -- your staff will be talking with me. I didn't wanted something to get -- I can, you know, mix what I knew and something to use what I got from the book.\n\nMr. Preyer. I just wondered if you had read about the Mexican cable, and perhaps through the years may have been --\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, I never have seen that it was mentioned Mexican cable. I have seen that he visited Mexico, in Mexico visited Soviet and Cuban embassies. This I have seen in books, this fact.\n\nMr. Preyer. If I have got one more moment, Mr. Chairman, to change the subject, one of the things that struck me is that when you defected, as Mrs. Burke mentioned, in Geneva, in 1964, very shortly after the Kennedy Assassination, I get the impression that the CIA or American forces to whom you defected, did not have much to say about the assassination or was not --\n\nMr. Nosenko. They are -- I mentioned must be Oswald, the asked. But they were asking different, whatever cases I can immediately give them, names, when recruited, his position,\nfrom what country, this they were interested, as much as possible\nto take this type of information. They asked me about Oswald.\nI told them what I knew.\n\nThe Chairman The ;time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Devine.\n\nMr. Devine. I don't want to know where you live, but\ndo you reside in the general area of the nation's capital?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was living in this area up to 19 -- middle\nof 1973, but FBI gentlemen -- I didn't mention , I also meeting\nFBI people when I am here, not only CIA, but they are not paying\nme anything. FBI people inform me that they have information\nthat KGB trying to locate me. Then it happened in the area\nwhere I was living in Maryland up to 1973, I was in a\nshopping center, and on me was coming a Soviet from KGB. I knew\nhis face, and this whole -- I immediately reported this and\nwe decided that for me better to move from the area where\nSoviet diplomats, KGB officer working under cover of diplomats\nare freely traveling and can spot me.\n\nMr. Devine. That person didn't recognize you?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I immediately turned and went, turned my back\nand went in another direction.\n\nMr. Devine. Have you been contacted or in touch with\nanyone from the Soviet Embassy here in Washington?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Only in 1964, the Soviet Embassy in\nWashington demanded to see me after defection.\nMr. Devine. Did you see them?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, in the State Department, in presence of American diplomats, I have seen for five, say seven minutes, Consul from Soviet Embassy and interpreter, another diplomat.\n\nMr. Devine. What did they want with you?\n\nMr. Nosenko. They ask me how could I do it, and do I understand the importance of this thing, that I defected from the country, and I said, gentlemen, nobody pushed me on this question, it is absolutely my own decision, and decision of free will, which I made long ago, and without any return. Then they told me now we know how to treat you, and what do you think about your Soviet citizenship.\n\nI said, it's automatically, I am rejecting it. I do not need. And on this I finished conversation.\n\nMr. Devine. They made no threats of reprisals against your family back there?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no. They later only, Mr. Congressman, they later sent two letters, one from wife and another from my mother. These letters were delivered by them. They visited American embassy in Moscow and had left these two letters. These letters were sent by American embassy in Moscow to State Department, State Department had given to CIA, CIA had given me these letters. I answered one short note that my decision is final, decision ideological and in spite of all\nmy love to the family, and in spite of my respect to the\nmemory of the father, I can repeat that if he was alive I would\nalso would do the same, that is all.\n\nMr. Devine. Getting back to one of Mr. Stoke's questions\nabout the amount of money paid to you for your years of\nincarceration, the fact that they gave you $15,000 or $20,000\nwhich you used for furniture and so forth, were there any\nstrings tied to either of those funds, the $80,000 or the subse-\nquently amount?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, no.\n\nMr. Devine. That you would not contact the press or\nanybody else about this?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, it never was mentioned, never.\n\nMr. Devine. No strings attached?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Devine. Finally, do you have any knowledge of any\nconnection with Oswald and the assassination of President\nKennedy?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Devine. From your connections in the KGB at that time?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Whatever I said, nothing more. I do not\nknow anything.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMrs. Burke.\n\nMrs. Burke. I have just a few random questions. You\nmentioned Priscilla Johnson's book. Did you by any chance while you were working in the American tourist area, did you have any occasion to investigate her coming to Russia or did she come during any of that time as a student?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Priscilla Johnson?\n\nMrs. Burke. Yes.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Why, yes, her name, she was a correspondent in Moscow working, and KGB didn't like her dispatches and they made very, very rude operations against her. They --\n\nMrs. Burke. What did they do.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Huh?\n\nMrs. Burke. What did they do to her?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, they wanted to get rid of her from the Soviet Union. They didn't see possibility to recruit her. They didn't see any possibility to find or to create compromising situation. They didn't like her dispatches which they were anti-Soviet. Then they decided to get rid of her, and they made such an operation in restaurant where she had dinner in evening. They put drugs in her liquor, which she was drinking, wine or vodka or whatever it would be, and she was absolutely drunk. And she was delivered in local regional, one of the regional little -- it's not clinic, it is where they deliver drunks to spend night. And they put her there and made photo pictures of her being drunk and other women drunk laying there and published an article and put even a picture. And surely\nshe was immediately recalled by her agency or her newspapers for which she was working.\n\nMrs. Burke. Do you think that is the wrong Priscilla Johnson?\n\nMr. Edgar. If the gentlewoman would yield, are you sure that you are talking about the same person?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Priscilla Johnson, yes, this correspondent, yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. Let me ask you one other question.\n\nWhen she was there, did she interview Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I know it is now reading here the books. I didn't know that she interviewed. I only found out it with living in the United States, with reading books.\n\nMrs. Burke. That she interviewed him. That didn't show in your file?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I didn't read her book -- this is what in some other books mentioned that she had interviewed him.\n\nMrs. Burke. Let me ask again about Oswald in Minsk, and first of all, can American tourists go to Minsk easily?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Minsk is open city, yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. It is an open city now. Was it an open city then?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. And when he was there, of course, I realize that you don't know and you did not keep up with what he was\ndoing there, but in reading that file, in the first few\npages or anything, did you notice anything in terms of his\ncontacts with Americans, or did you notice anything at all\nthat was extraordinary about him?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, there wasn't. For the whole his period\nof time there wasn't found any indication on suspicion,\nsuspicious meetings or anything suspicion concerning his contacts\nwith Americans.\n\nMrs. Burke. Let me -- As I understand it, it was fairly\nroutine that everyone's phone would be tapped, so that that\nwas not --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. -- your information that that would be\nnothing unusual.\n\nYou know, there is one thing that is bothering me, and\nthat is the inconsistency and the greater detail that is present\ntoday than in your earlier statements.\n\nCould you give us an explanation of why there is more de-\ntail today?\n\nFor instance, in your earlier statements I noticed you\nrefer to the interpreter as a tourist, the tourist guide, as\njust a tourist guide or an interpreter? Today you referred\nby name to that person. And again, the two psychiatrists --\n\nMr. Nosenko. I don't know even now name of this inter-\npreter. I do not remember name.\nMrs. Burke. I see. I thought --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Interpreter, I never mentioned.\n\nMrs. Burke. You never mentioned the interpreter?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I do not remember her name.\n\nMrs. Burke. It was just this officer Rastrusin?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Officer, yes.\n\nMrs. Burke. He was -- but he was the one that found -- wasn't he the one that found Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, this is the officer who reported about him.\n\nMrs. Burke. He reported it, but he didn't find him?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, interpreter found him with administration of the hotel where Oswald was staying.\n\nMrs. Burke. Oh, I see.\n\nMr. Nosenko. You see, interpreter has come in the morning to take him or has come to take him to city, to show him, as interpreter on a guide, on a tour. And she was waiting about 20, 25, 30 minutes and was concerned.\n\nThe Chairman. Time is up. One more.\n\nMrs. Burke. All right, just one more question.\n\nWhen Oswald arrived, then, he didn't speak very much Russian, is that right?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I didn't hear that he spoke in Russian.\n\nMrs. Burke. I see. Were there any notations at all in the file -- what is your understanding of his fluency in Russian\nduring the time of his stay?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Well, during time of his stay surely he started a little bit to talk, but it wasn't very, it wasn't good Russian. It wasn't even --\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.\n\nMrs. Burke. Thank you.\n\nThe Chairman. Mr. Dodd.\n\nMr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nI would like to just pick up on that line of questioning, if I could, with you, Mr. Nosenko.\n\nCorrect me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, Oswald, you were aware of Oswald's desire to defect. There was a decision, and in fact he was informed through his Intourist guide that his request had been rejected.\n\nIs that correct so far?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Is in general, but it wasn't in this ways told to him. It was in so-called, you know, soft manner. It was explained to him by through Intourist --\n\nMr. Dodd. That he would have to go through his embassy?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, that Intourist not dealing with this question. He must go through this, this, this procedures.\n\nMr. Dodd. Okay.\n\nNow, you, at the time of this, of Oswald's request, you were working in the Seventh Department of the Second Directorate which was involved with tourism?\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Dodd. Okay. Could you tell me what would be the normal operating procedures within the Soviet Union if a tourist were involved, say, in a car accident with an Intourist guide. Say a Frenchman was involved in a car accident. Assuming it was not his fault, someone hit him, what happens? Do they notify immediately the French Embassy, what steps do they take in order to deal with that individual?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I would assume, sir, that he will be, sure, he immediately will be taken in polyclinic, will be informed his embassy.\n\nMr. Dodd. Those kind of steps.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Dodd. If you had made a decision that Oswald should not be accepted in the Soviet Union, and if you find him in his room with his wrist slit, why don't you then contact the American Embassy and notify them that you have an American on your hands who just tried to kill himself?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, he wasn't an employee of American embassy.\n\nMr. Dodd. He was a tourist, though.\n\nMr. Nosenko. A tourist.\n\nMr. Dodd. And I just asked you about a Frenchman who might be a tourist and get in a car accident, and you said you would take him to the hospital, you would notify the embassy. Why\ndon't you take Mr. Oswald to the hospital and notify the American embassy?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Nobody knew that he would cut wrist.\n\nMr. Dodd. No, but you found him with his wrist cut.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right. He was delivered in hospital.\n\nMr. Dodd. Why didn't you notify the American embassy?\n\nMr. Nosenko. He wasn't dying, he wasn't serious, they made transfusion and put stitches. It is -- I am telling what I think why it was.\n\nMr. Dodd. You understand my problem here. You have got someone who you don't want to accept him. You have already made a decision that he shouldn't be allowed to defect. You walk into his room and find him with his wrist slit, it would seem to me that this guy has already indicated just by that act alone that he is not playing with a full deck of cards, and you decide then that you are going to accept him because you are worried that it might cause some embarrassment after Camp David.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. But the question to inform the Embassy, it must be passing through such stage. Intourist itself cannot contact the American Embassy.\n\nMr. Dodd. No, obviously.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. They must contact their Minister of Foreign Trade which in its turn putting question to Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet\nUnion can contact the embassy.\n\nMr. Dodd. Let me jump onto something else quickly in the time we've got.\n\nYou knew that Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Dodd. You knew by your answer to Mrs. Burke's question a minute ago that Oswald had a student's knowledge of Russian?\n\nMr. Nosenko. When he was living in Minsk, not before, before he has come. No.\n\nMr. Dodd. You didn't know that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, when he was living in Minsk, when he was in daily contact with Soviets working at the plant and having friends.\n\nMr. Dodd. Did you know that he had been a student of Marxism?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No.\n\nMr. Dodd. Did you know that he had given the U.S. embassy his notice to defect?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I know that he visited embassy and after was, he was told that he will be allowed to stay, after this.\n\nMr. Dodd. You were not aware at that time that he contacted through Intourist and eventually your office and made it known that he intended to defect or wanted to defect, you were not aware or your department was not aware that he had\nalready notified the American embassy that he intended to\ndefect?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, no, sir.\n\nMr. Dodd. You were not aware of that.\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. He wasn't under surveillance. We\ndidn't know. When he was going alone without interpreter, we\ndidn't know.\n\nMr. Dodd. I didn't ask you how you know. I just asked\nyou whether or not -- he didn't tell you that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. Nobody from KGB talked with him.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Sawyer?\n\nMr. Sawyer. When Congressman Devine asked you how you\nknew your family was okay or that they hadn't invoked any\nreprisals, I didn't get the answer.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I asked Mr. Solie in '69, '70, once\nI asked, anything about my family?\n\nMr. Sawyer. Mr. who?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Bruce Solie, CIA officer who was in\ncontact with me, '69, '70. He answered me that they are all\nright, everything okay. But he didn't went in any detail\nand I never returned more to this question. But there is another\npoint, sir. Besides the father's position, after he died, she\nwas receiving, she received pension, and besides that, for\nthe years --\nMr. Sawyer. How did you know she died?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Father died, I said. Father died in 1956. After father's death she received a pension.\n\nMr. Sawyer. I understand. You went through that before.\n\nI noticed here though, when he slashed his wrist, the psychiatric examination report here by the doctor says the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian, so he must have spoken Russian, you know, to whatever degree, when he went there. I thought you said you were always interested in someone who can speak Russian or has studied anything Russian.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Who specializes in any field of Russia, who will be working for the United States government.\n\nMr. Sawyer. But here is a guy at that time, when he first came there, within a matter of days after, the doctor says the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir --\n\nMr. Sawyer. That would have keyed interest right there, wouldn't it?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, if we knew that he studied in Columbia University, in Yale University --\n\nMr. Sawyer. Well, it says right --\n\nMr. Nosenko. In Russian Institute.\n\nMr. Sawyer. It says on the report, this was on the 21st or the 23rd or 25th of October, a week after he arrived, it\nsays the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian. So you knew he spoke Russian at that time. And yet that was one of your criteria.\n\nMr. Nosenko: Well, sir, I'm curious.\n\nMr. Sawyer. Something else I am a little curious about. Apparently, coming here, wanting to defect, wanting to leave America, wanting Russia, here is a guy that if he didn't know anything would be apparently capable of going back to the United States at the behest of KGB in areas of the country that Russian diplomats and so forth, KGB people weren't allowed to go and dig up information for them and come back. Here is a guy you didn't have to threaten, he volunteers. And it seems strange you wouldn't talk to him or be interested in him just from that point of view.\n\nAnd how -- and another thing that greatly bothers me, how did you know that he, being in the Marines, you knew that, but how did you know he wasn't a cryptographer or how did you know he wasn't stationed in the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as a guard or as a messenger or a clerk, or that he worked with U-2s, which apparently he did. Why would the KGB not at least find these things out, with a guy that wants to go to Russia, wants to be a Russian?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I only can repeat you, when on him was received the first information about his arrival, checkup was made on him. There wasn't any existing material in KGB, any\nknowledge about him. He never was before in the Soviet Union.\n\nIn judging by the question --\n\nMr. Sawyer. Why weren't they asking, why wouldn't they ask, that's the question. Why wouldn't they ask?\n\nMr. Nosenko. They are not --\n\nMr. Sawyer. Apparently they knew he could speak Russian.\n\nMr. Nosenko. -- asking Americans approaching.\n\nJudging by the questionnaire, they decided, the KGB decided, Seventh Department, he is not an interesting target.\n\nMr. Sawyer. Well, why would a person like this not even be interesting for something like the Tokyo Rose, on some kind of propaganda program where he could say how bad things were in the United States, and why he didn't want to stay there anymore and how great they were in Russia, like these propagandists do?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I am telling you why it was decided, and how KGB was thinking about him.\n\nMr. Sawyer. I yield back the balance of my time.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Fithian.\n\nMr. Fithian. Mr. Chairman, I just now got this report. I wonder if I could let Mr. Edgar go ahead of me?\n\nThe Chairman. The Chair will recognize Mr. Edgar.\n\nMr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nI have a series of questions which I hope most of which\nwill be yes and no kinds of questions.\n\nDid you conduct in the KGB a program to compromise and recruit journalists?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I was working, when I started to work in the KGB in 1953, the first year I was working against American correspondents.\n\nMr. Edgar. But the KGB, not you personally, but the KGB did have a policy of going against journalists and trying to compromise them, yes or no?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Trying to recruit or compromise them.\n\nMr. Edgar. Did they censor all the journalists' notes that they could gather from the journalists? Did they censor the notes before they allowed the story to go out?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Edgar. Priscilla Johnson interviewed Oswald on the 15th of November, 1959. Would the KGB have looked at her notes from that interview?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, they are censored not by the KGB, but there is special -- it is government organization was censoring this. Some materials are coming to the KGB, some are not coming.\n\nMr. Edgar. Well, she reveals in her article that he was a Marxist, that Oswald was a Marxist and a Marine Corps radar man. It would seem to me the KGB would have discovered that in November of 1959.\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I didn't know this in those days.\n\nMr. Edgar. Do you know a correspondent by the name of Arlene Mosby??\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, I heard such a name, Mosby, a woman who was a correspondent.\n\nMr. Edgar. In the earlier questioning of Congresswoman Burke, you were not confusing Arlene Mosby with the treatment of Priscilla Johnson?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I think it was Priscilla Johnson, the case which I described, I think so. I think so, it was Priscilla Johnson.\n\nMr. Edgar. How do you know?\n\nMr. Nosenko. What I heard from colleagues who were in KGB, who were working against correspondents.\n\nMr. Edgar. But you are not absolutely clear?\n\nMr. Nosenko. And then there was an article in --\n\nMr. Edgar. You are not absolutely --\n\nMr. Nosenko. In literary newspaper, I think it was, not in Pravda, Izvestia, but in Literary Gazette.\n\nMr. Edgar. But you are not absolutely certain?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No. I think it was Priscilla Johnson, as I said.\n\nMr. Edgar. But it could have been someone else.\n\nMr. Nosenko. An American correspondent, woman.\n\nMr. Edgar. Are you certain that after 1967 you sat down\nwith the CIA and corrected your earlier statements about Oswald, yes or no?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nMr. Edgar. We have only a few pages of written testimony, some three pages that you gave, and in fact, in the beginning part of that testimony, you indicate that you don't want to go through it again because your earlier testimony will stand for itself. I am paraphrasing what you said.\n\nWere the notes and the recordings of those corrections made and kept by the CIA?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, Mr. Bruce Solie talking with me every day for a period from the end of '67, the whole '68, 1968, '69, every conversation he was recording. But he never has come and showed his notes, transcriptions or anything. He was returning to every case, to every aspect by 20, 25, 30 times.\n\nMr. Edgar. But specifically on the Oswald case, would it be correct in our assuming that it was more than three pages of notes on specifically Lee Harvey Oswald after 1967?\n\nMr. Nosenko. If he was raising questions concerning also Lee Harvey Oswald.\n\nMR. Edgar. We have some information that Bruce Solie --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, Mr. Solie.\n\nMr. Edgar. Stated in a deposition that there is nothing on Oswald other than the three pages.\n\nMr. Nosenko. I cannot say how many pages. I know\nthat he was passing through all cases, all questions, with me\nfor the period almost two years.\n\nMr. Edgar. Who other than Bruce Solie did you talk to about\ncorrecting your earlier statements?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I wasn't correcting them. They were correcting;\nthey were talking returning back to every case.\n\nMr. Edgar. One final question.\n\nMr. Nosenko. And also besides Mr. Solie, were people coming\nfrom FBI with cases in which were interested for them.\n\nMr. Edgar. One final question. You stopped our hearing\nabout an hour ago and were concerned about our playing the tape\nand bringing up old memories, and I respect the fact that you are\nvery patriotic in coming before this Committee and helping us.\n\nWould you be willing to sit down with our staff and go\nthrough a series of written questions which outline specifically\nfor you the contradictions of your 1964, '65, '66 and early '67\ntimeframe, with the statements that you made in '67, '68 and\n'78, and indicate in a yes-no manner which statement, laid side\nby side, is true and which statement is false?\n\nMr. Nosenko. If it is the wish of the Committee, sure.\n\nMr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nMr. Fithian?\n\nMr. Fithian. Mr. Nosenko, do you remember when it was that the\nFBI first interviewed you concerning Oswald?\nMr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember dates, but --\n\nMr. Fithian. It was between February and April?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right, right.\n\nMr. Fithian. The information we have is that it was early March, the first week in March. Is that about right?\n\nNow have you talked to the FBI about that testimony at any time since then?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Gentlemen, on many, many times I have seen FBI, many, many questions raised. I cannot -- about this testimony, no, no.\n\nMr. Fithian. About the Oswald testimony?\n\nMr. Nosenko. About Oswald were asked questions, but not about this testimony. I do not remember about this testimony.\n\nMr. Fithian. My question is, there is a written transcript summary of your testimony to the FBI taken on March 5th, 1964.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Fithian. My question is, have you at any time since then visited with the FBI about this testimony?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, no, sir.\n\nMr. Fithian. Now, next, when -- what is your understanding as to when Oswald first offered to defect, when you first knew, when the KGB first knew he was interested in defecting?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I cannot give you a date.\n\nMr. Fithian. All right.\n\nWell, he filled out an application --\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, no application, in oral form. He told the interpreter in oral form.\n\nMr. Fithian. This was the Intourist?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Interpreter of the Intourist.\n\nMr. Fithian. And then the Intourist came to the KGB?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right, and it immediately was informed to KGB that this American applies, wants to stay, said to interpreter.\n\nMr. Fithian. And then you reviewed the file?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It was several pieces of pages what we had on him. It wasn't even file.\n\nMr. Fithian. But you reviewed whatever applications --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right. No it wasn't application to stay. He in oral form told the interpreter that he wants to stay Soviet Union.\n\nMr. Fithian. You reviewed the pages that he had filled out for the visa and any other sheets that you had?\n\nMr. Nosenko. He didn't -- yes, these documents, yes, for the visa, questionnaire and --\n\nMr. Fithian. Yes. What I am trying to get at is what did you have in front of you physically, knowledgeably about Oswald?\n\nMr. Nosenko. What I remember, it was it was several pages only, was questionnaire, was form of document from Intourist received how long his tour and how many days. There was checks of Oswald in archives of KGB to forms. There was information from Intourist who work with Oswald and\nMr. Fithian. All right. Let me just stop you here.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes.\n\nMr. Fithian. The forms in there by the KGB were filled out based on what information?\n\nMr. Nosenko. On his name, what he supplied who he is, when he was asking visa.\n\nMr. Fithian. But they conducted no check, no search?\n\nMr. Nosenko. It is in the archives of KGB, if he ever was in Soviet Union, on him there will be something. If he wasn't in Soviet Union but he was known to intelligence service --\n\nMr. Fithian. But you didn't have any record on that.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Nothing.\n\nMr. Fithian. And so the final question is that the only thing that you had to judge -that he was an uninteresting subject was what he had told the Intourist guide?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Right.\n\nMr. Fithian. That is the only substantive thing?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, and his questionnaire for who he is, his name, whatever he filled about himself. That's all.\n\nThe Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.\n\nThe Chair has one additional request from one member, for one additional question.\n\nMr. Sawyer?\n\nMr. Sawyer. I just have one additional question, and that is the $80,000 you got for compensation and the $15,000 or $20,000\nyou got later, that was net money after whatever taxes or whatever it was --\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, after all taxes were taken.\n\nMr. Sawyer. Thank you.\n\nMr. Dodd. Mr. Chairman?\n\nThe Chairman. Mr. Dodd?\n\nMr. Dodd. I just wondered for the record, I wondered if, Mr. Nosenko, you could tell us when you arrived in this country on February 12th, 1964, between February 12th, 1964 and April 4th, 1964, where were you in this country?\n\nMr. Nosenko. February 12 of 1964 and April 4th, I was staying in house in Virginia. I do not know address.\n\nMr. Dodd. Did you go -- did you travel at all?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir.\n\nMr. Dodd. No vacation?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Oh, I went in March on week to Hawaii I was.\n\nMr. Dodd. Were you on your own?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, no, no, with guards.\n\nMr. Dodd. It was a relaxed period for you and just a chance to rest?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Chance to get a little bit rest.\n\nMr. Dodd. Is it your knowledge that this is the normal way that defectors are treated when they come to this country?\n\nMr. Nosenko. I do not know.\n\nMr. Dodd. Just one last point, Mr. Chairman, and that is\nwith regard to the American exhibit, as a result of a statement by Mr. Klein which I understand you did not disagree with, the American exhibit ended on September 4th, 1959? That's when the termination of the exhibit was?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, he showed me an article.\n\nMr. Dodd. Is it your knowledge that employees that worked during the exhibit stayed on for a period of time after that?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Sure, to it will be disassembled, this is the whole process is going on. It is closed for visitors to visit, to look.\n\nMr. Dodd. How long a period would that have been, a week?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, more.\n\nMr. Dodd. More?\n\nMr. Nosenko. More, sure.\n\nMr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.\n\nThe Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, with reference to your earlier comments this evening regarding what transpired during your period of isolation, which you described as extreme spartan conditions, I would like to make this request of you. I think the record ought to in a very graphic way portray those conditions under which you were subjected during that period of time, and while you are complying with Mr. Edgar's request and working with the staff in terms of the contradictory data, would you also agree to work with the staff in terms of seeing that the record has a complete and accurate description --\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. --of all the conditions which you underwent during that period?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. Thank you.\n\nDid you have some?\n\nMr. Cornwell. Following up on the question that Congressman Dodd just asked you, the staff, in an attempt to determine how long it took to disassemble the exhibition, checked with a knowledgeable employee who was involved in that process in the State Department and were informed by that person that the exhibition was disassembled and the persons who were operating it had left by October the 4th, approximately 30 days after the exhibition was terminated.\n\nWould you disagree with that information?\n\nMr. Nosenko. No, sir, I cannot disagree. I do not remember. I do not know, even, when they left, no, sir.\n\nMr. Cornwell. That is all I have.\n\nThe Chairman. Anything further from the Committee?\n\nNow, Mr. Devine, do you have anything?\n\nMr. Devine. No. He is under continuing subpoena.\n\nThe Chairman. Under the rules of the Committee, Mr. Nosenko, any witness appearing before our Committee is entitled at the conclusion of his testimony to address the Committee for a period of five minutes for the purpose of clarifying anything\nfor the record or making any statement he so desires, and I want\nto at this time afford you that five minute period to make such a\nstatement, if you so desire.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I consider\nmy appearance, invitation to appear at Committee, as I told also\nthe same applies before, my meetings with the staff of the Commit-\ntee, I consider it honor, great honor for me. I will try to\nanswer whatever I remember, whatever I know as only truth, and\nbut the truth. And you would like to see me appear at any time,\nI am at your disposal and I will try to give you the only things\nwhat I know.\n\nThe Chairman. Thank you.\n\nThat is the completion of your statement, sir?\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, on behalf of the Committee and\nthe United States Congress, I want to express our appreciation to\nyou for having appeared here and having given this Committee the\nbenefit of your testimony. At this time I would remind you of\nthe terms of your agreement to work with our staff and provide\nfurther information to the Committee, that you will continue\nunder the oath administered to you by this Committee.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.\n\nThe Chairman. Thank you very much for your appearance\nhere.\n\nMr. Nosenko. Thank you, sir.\nThe Chairman. You are excused.\n\nAt this time, there being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting is adjourned subject to the call of the Chair.\n\n(Whereupon, at 10:17 o'clock p.m., the Committee was adjourned subject to the call of the Chair.)\n\n---", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10324.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 116, "total-input-tokens": 132588, "total-output-tokens": 39755, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 0, 1], [0, 382, 2], [382, 1256, 3], [1256, 2260, 4], [2260, 3319, 5], [3319, 4502, 6], [4502, 5532, 7], [5532, 6797, 8], [6797, 7969, 9], [7969, 9205, 10], [9205, 10505, 11], [10505, 11578, 12], [11578, 12538, 13], [12538, 13828, 14], [13828, 15036, 15], [15036, 16139, 16], [16139, 17438, 17], [17438, 18761, 18], [18761, 20025, 19], [20025, 21063, 20], [21063, 22076, 21], [22076, 23067, 22], [23067, 24259, 23], [24259, 25283, 24], [25283, 26505, 25], [26505, 27552, 26], [27552, 28606, 27], [28606, 29735, 28], [29735, 30733, 29], [30733, 31849, 30], [31849, 33056, 31], [33056, 34188, 32], [34188, 35325, 33], [35325, 36173, 34], [36173, 37321, 35], [37321, 38670, 36], [38670, 39825, 37], [39825, 40926, 38], [40926, 41944, 39], [41944, 43275, 40], [43275, 44594, 41], [44594, 45926, 42], [45926, 47182, 43], [47182, 48307, 44], [48307, 49790, 45], [49790, 50930, 46], [50930, 52105, 47], [52105, 53396, 48], [53396, 54640, 49], [54640, 55852, 50], [55852, 56874, 51], [56874, 58286, 52], [58286, 59725, 53], [59725, 61220, 54], [61220, 62440, 55], [62440, 63530, 56], [63530, 64694, 57], [64694, 66022, 58], [66022, 67281, 59], [67281, 68554, 60], [68554, 69927, 61], [69927, 71031, 62], [71031, 72413, 63], [72413, 73745, 64], [73745, 74926, 65], [74926, 76033, 66], [76033, 77341, 67], [77341, 78574, 68], [78574, 79909, 69], [79909, 81158, 70], [81158, 82422, 71], [82422, 83670, 72], [83670, 84991, 73], [84991, 86418, 74], [86418, 87740, 75], [87740, 88848, 76], [88848, 90139, 77], [90139, 91515, 78], [91515, 92845, 79], [92845, 94082, 80], [94082, 95251, 81], [95251, 96554, 82], [96554, 97818, 83], [97818, 99066, 84], [99066, 100151, 85], [100151, 101398, 86], [101398, 102795, 87], [102795, 104149, 88], [104149, 105457, 89], [105457, 106775, 90], [106775, 108077, 91], [108077, 109150, 92], [109150, 110481, 93], [110481, 111591, 94], [111591, 112765, 95], [112765, 113911, 96], [113911, 115068, 97], [115068, 116264, 98], [116264, 117535, 99], [117535, 118590, 100], [118590, 119702, 101], [119702, 120935, 102], [120935, 122338, 103], [122338, 123559, 104], [123559, 124724, 105], [124724, 125824, 106], [125824, 127076, 107], [127076, 128402, 108], [128402, 129577, 109], [129577, 130846, 110], [130846, 132025, 111], [132025, 133107, 112], [133107, 134393, 113], [134393, 135596, 114], [135596, 136857, 115], [136857, 137127, 116]]}} {"id": "821c0fb9c7c00e39ab578d5c7fc357e32fa1b7e2", "text": "Agency Information\n\nAGENCY: HSCA\nRECORD NUMBER: 180-10131-10325\nRECORD SERIES: SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY\nAGENCY FILE NUMBER: 014725\n\nDocument Information\n\nORIGINATOR: HSCA\nFROM: TOVAR, BERNARD HUGH\nTO:\nTITLE: DEPOSITION OF BERNARD HUGH TOVAR\n\nDATE: 06/29/1978\nPAGES: 48\n\nSUBJECTS:\nCIA, METHODOLOGY\nTOVAR, BERNARD HUGH, TESTIMONY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE\nOSWALD, LEE, RUSSIAN PERIOD, DEFECTION TO RUSSIA\n\nDOCUMENT TYPE: TRANSCRIPT\nCLASSIFICATION: Top Secret\nRESTRICTIONS: 3\nCURRENT STATUS: Redact\nDATE OF LAST REVIEW: 03/26/1997\n\nOPENING CRITERIA:\n\nCOMMENTS: Box 5\nTESTIMONY OF:\n\nBernard Hugh Tovar\n\nPAGE 2\nASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY\n\nThursday, June 29, 1978\n\nU. S. House of Representatives,\nJohn F. Kennedy Subcommittee of\nSelect Committee on Assassinations,\nWashington, D. C.\n\nDeposition of:\n\nBERNARD HUGH TOVAR\n\ncalled for examination by staff counsel for the subcommittee,\npursuant to notice, in the offices of House Annex II, Room 3370,\nSecond and D. Streets, Southwest, Washington, D. C., beginning at\n2:00 o'clock p.m., before Albert Joseph LaFrance, a Notary Public\nin and for the District of Columbia, when were present on behalf\nof the respective parties:\n\nFor the Subcommittee:\n\nMICHAEL GOLDSMITH, ESQ. Staff Counsel\n\nELIZABETH WOLF\n\nFor the Deponent:\n\n(There was representation by counsel)\nTESTIMONY OF HUGH TOVAR\n\nMr. Goldsmith. State your name for the record.\n\nMr. Tovar. I sign my name B. Hugh. My full name is Bernard Hugh Tovar.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tovar, my name is Michael Goldsmith, Senator Staff Counsel of the Select Committee on Assassinations. I have been designated by the Committee to take your deposition today. You are here voluntarily today?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You have the right to have counsel present. Do you waive that right?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Have you read a copy of the Committee's supporting resolution?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Have you had a chance to read Rule Number 4?\n\nMr. Tovar. I have.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The Committee rules provide for the transcript of a deposition to be made available to a witness and actually be delivered for retention by any witness that gives the Committee a statement. However, by virtue of the arrangement that the Committee has worked out with the CIA, the Agency has asked us to request Agency employees testifying before us to waive the right actually to receive a copy of the transcript.\nThe reason for that is because the transcript frequently will contain classified information and the Agency prefers for that information to be kept in our secure area here. So I would like to ask you to waive your right to receive a copy of your statement but in so doing, I want to assure you that you will be given a right to review the transcript for accuracy, to make comment upon it and if necessary, to give an additional statement.\n\nMr. Tovar. I agree.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to inform you that the court reporter will provide you with a transcript and the transcript will be certified by the reporter as a complete, accurate and true record of all the testimony that you give here today.\n\nNow, you are employed by the CIA, is that correct?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I had given you earlier a copy of a letter dated 23 March 1978 from Mr. Carlucci to the Chairman of this Committee. Have you had a chance to read that letter?\n\nMr. Tovar. I have.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you understand it?\n\nMr. Tovar. I understand it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Then I think we are ready to proceed to the substance of the questioning. What is your present position with the CIA?\n\nMr. Tovar. I am the Chief of the Counterintelligence\nStaff of the Directorate of Operations.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working in that capacity?\n\nMr. Tovar. Ever since a year ago April.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working with the Agency?\n\nMr. Tovar. Thirty years.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What was your assignment prior to becoming Chief of the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. I was recently returned from overseas where I was Station Chief in Bangkok and three years before that, Chief of the Station in Laos.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Prior to assuming your position as Chief of the CI Staff had you had extensive experience in the area of counterintelligence?\n\nMr. Tovar. No, not particularly. We don't as a rule specialize. We are normally generalists. I do not consider myself a counterintelligence expert.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. During the years 1959 to '63 what position did you occupy with the Agency?\n\nMr. Tovar. In 1959 I was Chief of Station in Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia.\n\nIn 1920, I came back and I was originally Deputy Chief and then Chief of the Branch in Far East Division which controls operations in the Phillipines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia,\nNew Zealand, and Oceania. That was until 1964.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Have you had a chance to review CIA\ndocument number 1817 and the pages that follow it?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, I have read these. I had not read these.\nThey were released by one of my subordinates, Mr. Friedlander.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you telling us that today is the first\nchance you had to read them?\n\nMr. Tovar. I did not read them this time. They went to\nyou, to the Committee but I have since read them.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. They were prepared by whom?\n\nMr. Tovar. Jack Friedlander, Chief of Operations. They\nwere signed by him, not prepared by him. They would have been\noriginated probably by Mr. Kowalski or Mr. Bradley, I am not\nsure which. I think Kowalski almost certainly.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The memorandum which is labeled CIA No.\n1817 was a response by the Agency to an inquiry by the\nCommittee as to whether it was standard operating procedure for\nthe Agency to debrief what in effect were repatriated defectors.\nI believe it is fair to say by way of summary that the memo\nsays that it was not in fact standard operating procedure\nduring the years 1959 to '63 to debrief such individuals. Is\nthat correct?\n\nMr. Tovar. Insofar as I understand it. My knowledge is\nlimited to what I see here before me in the paper. During this\nperiod in question I was not involved, so I didn't know what\nthe current policy was then.\n\nWhat I have been told since by those who should know is that there was no policy as set forth here.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the criteria were for selecting the 117 individuals whose files were reviewed?\n\nMr. Tovar. No. I think someone mentioned the other day that the names were incorporated in a memorandum I think originally by the FBI but I would not certify to that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tovar, since you have no direct knowledge as to the manner in which this memo was prepared and, for example, you don't know the criteria that was used for choosing these 117 people, I am not going to ask you questions pertaining to that document. I would like to request that you communicate with the Office of Legislative Counsel at the Agency and tell them the individual who was involved in the actual direct preparation of the document so that I could spend some time with him.\n\nMr. Tovar. The document, of course, is over my signature, so I stand behind the document. I am responsible for what was said there. If it is incorrect then I am incorrect in letting that document out. I have no personal first hand knowledge of the research he did to arrive at the conclusion here which he presented to me and I endorsed. I am prepared to stand behind it but I will give you his name.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I want to ask you some questions about the\ndocument. CIA no. 1818 indicates that CI Staff has completed a\nreview of the files of 117 US persons who had \"defected\" to\nthe USSR between 1959 and '63 and since returned to the United\nStates. Is that correct? '58 to '63?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like you to review the statement\nunder the name Thomas Morri.dian M-O-R-R-I-D-I-A-N. While you\nread that paragraph, I will state for the record that the way\nthe memo is set forth it indicates that it was not standard\noperating procedure to debrief such individuals, that of 117\npeople whose files were reviewed only ten were debriefed.\nThen it proceeds to list the ten individuals who in fact were\ndebriefed.\n\nI have now requested Mr. Tovar to read the first summary\nwhich is right next to the name of the first person who was\ndebriefed.\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes sir.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did that individual defect?\n\nMr. Tovar. 1947 is the year he went to the USSR. I\nassume that is the year he defected, if that is the term.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. So that in fact that individual was not\nsomeone who defected between 1958 and 1963?\n\nMr. Tovar. That is correct.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Let us look at the next individual under\nB, Joseph Marshall.\nMr. Tovar. Yes sir.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did Mr. Marshall defect?\n\nMr. Tovar. It is not clear. He was born in the US in 1897. He said he was employed in Hawaii in 1921. There is no indication whence he went to the USSR.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There is no indication he defected between '58 and '63?\n\nMr. Tovar. No. He was arrested by the Soviets in 1945. Conceivably he might have defected after that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The letter \"C\", Tommaro S-G-O-V-I-O. Would you please read that section and tell us when this individual defected?\n\nMr. Tovar. Again, he went to the USSR with his parents in the 1930s. No indication when he defected. He left the USSR in 1960. No way of telling.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. This individual did not defect between '58 and '63?\n\nMr. Tovar. At last we have no indication he did. One would assume to the contrary.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Letter \"D\", Mary Mackler, will you please read the first summary and tell us when she defected?\n\nMr. Tovar. There is no indication when she defected. She went to the USSR with her parents in 1931. Sometime after, married a Soviet.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Again, no indication she defected between\n'58 and '63?\n\nMr. Tovar. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you look at letter \"E\". Sonia and Fred A-S-I-N-I-A-N. When did they defect?\n\nMr. Tovar. They renounced their US citizenship in 1948. So I assume that is the operative year.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Will you look at the letter \"F\" now?\n\nMr. Tovar. Jack Kurasinski.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did he defect?\n\nMr. Tovar. He recounced his US citizenship in '34 and departed USSR I assume in 1934.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The point I am trying to make is that the memo responding to the Committee's inquiry makes reference to ten individuals who defected between the years '58 and '63. It then proceed to provide us with ten names. But in fact, if we continue to look through the list we will see that seven of the ten individuals did not defect during that time period. Some of them did return during that time period.\n\nMr. Tovar. And were debriefed.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. And were debriefed.\n\nMr. Tovar. Contacted.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Of the ten, perhaps three or four returned during the relevant time period. I asked those questions mainly to draw your attention to the fact that the response given was not really --\nMr. Tovar. -- precisely what you wanted?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't know the answer to that. I would assume that the criteria they applied here as best they could was when did he defect, when did he return, was he debriefed or contacted? In some cases they hit one out of three, in other cases two out of three. I think they were giving the best correlation with your criteria that they could.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that. My point might be then that the introductory section should not have stated that these were people in 1958 and '63 when in fact they were not.\n\nMr. Tovar. You are right. That is an incorrect statement. Is your requesting memo here? That is not a very good statement.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Here is the letter dated April 6, 1978 which I show you just for your information to show you what the Committee was requesting from the Agency. If you will look under number two.\n\nMr. Tovar. Then this would appear to correlate with that. You asked to indicate whether the Agency from '58 to '63 interviewed or debriefed former American defectors. So, the time they defected is not the operative consideration.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No, it was not.\n\nMr. Tovar. The time of the debriefing --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes, that would be the focus.\nMr. Tovar. So these would be at least consistent with that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes, that is true. I would like also for purposes of further clarification, to have you read the letter dated May 12, 1978 starting with the second full paragraph. It is not numbered.\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I show you that only for your background purposes, not to ask you any questions about it. In any event, I would appreciate having the name of the individual who prepared the memo passed along to the Office of the Legislative Counsel.\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes sir.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The response that was provided to the Committee indicates that the CIA had no standard procedure for debriefing returning US defectors. What was the basis for that policy or actually for the absence of the policy?\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't know. I can speculate only -- not having been there and not having any involvement -- I don't know what mentality of those in charge was at that time.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What would your speculation be?\n\nMr. Tovar. I would speculate that the contact with and debriefing, in effect the supervision of Americans in that category would be FBI's prerogative and the Agency as a rule would not have had any basic interest or reason to be involved unless there were a specific counterintelligence concern.\nMr. Goldsmith. Does the Agency today have a policy of, as a matter of routine operating procedure, debriefing returning defectors?\n\nMr. Tovar. None that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Again, would you say you relied on the FBI to conduct those interviews?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is there any coordination between the Agency and the FBI so that the Bureau is informed when someone in fact is returning?\n\nMr. Tovar. On American defectors, the type you are speaking of here?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. An American defector who is repatriated.\n\nMr. Tovar. I know of no case where they would be interested in the subject. I can't say there is a procedure in being. Knowing the way we relate to the FBI, if we knew of a case of returning Americans, say we learned it from an overseas station and it seemed of interest, we would probably refer it directly to the FBI by letter.\n\nI am speculating here because I know of no case in point.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There is no standard procedure for contacting the Bureau and informing them of a returning defector?\n\nMr. Tovar. Not that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You would be the person who would be aware of such a procedure?\nMr. Tovar. Between the Soviet-East European Division and CI Staff we should be aware of it. The two were most primarily concerned with the USSR. I think one or the other of us would inform the Bureau. This is not our primary concern: The Americans, even when they have been naughty boys, having gone to USSR and decided to return, we still don't have necessarily a professional interest in that type of person.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is the responsibility of the CI Staff within the CIA?\n\nMr. Tovar. In a couple of sentences it is a little difficult. I will tell you what we do. The CI Staff has two principal areas of activity. We are first of all a staff. Are you familiar with the staff as opposed to the division?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No, I am not.\n\nMr. Tovar. You have seen the table of organization of DDO?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. You know generally how we are organized?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. The main set of components of the Directorate is divisions and staffs. The divisions operate a function overseas. We are staff and that is in the military sense we support the Directorate and we support the Director, we support one another in an advisory capacity and in various ways. So, we are not an operating component. We don't run spies. We have\na lot of activities which impact on operations but we are not in\nthe true sense of the term an operating element.\n\nSo, having said that, the primary field of activity for\nthe CI Staff is research and analysis, and then the other,\nwhat we refer to as operations coordination. Now, that is sort\nof the term which does not -- research and analysis is clear.\nWe examine and analyze cases, essentially cases. We are not\nscrutinizing people. We are looking at intelligence operations,\nold and current, primarily things that are not terribly\ncurrent. We don't tend to follow current operations in the\nanalytic sense. We take old cases and look them over to see\nif mistakes were made, to see if we can derive lessons from\nmistakes made in the past. We publish papers for the Agency's\ncommunity at large, all in the R&A field.\n\nOn the other side we function in the sense of a true staff.\nWe keep our fingers on the activity of the Directorate overseas.\nWe monitor what they are doing, not in the sense of being\nspooky but we simply read the correspondence. We are given\nnormal distribution of most correspondence coming back from\noverseas. We keep a hand on the pulse of counterintelligence\nactivities abroad.\n\nTo do this, we obviously have to have reasonable currency\non operational activity across the board. So, we are generally\naware of the operational patterns of activity that prevail in\nvarious overseas stations. On that basis we are in a position\nto advise the DDO or Directorate as to the level of performance, the kind of activity conducted, the quality, the proper or improper degree of emphasis. We maintain an overview on behalf of DDO.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is your concentration oriented towards counterintelligence threats of a foreign nature?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, totally.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You would not be concerned at all with counterintelligence threats domestically?\n\nMr. Tovar. None whatsoever.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is it correct to say that would be the responsibility of the Bureau?\n\nMr. Tovar. Absolutely.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Now, Lee Harvey Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in 1962. While in the Soviet Union he worked as a worker in a radio factory. Upon his return I imagine there was someone concerned about his being a counterintelligence threat. Is it fair to say, and I do not want to ask you leading questions but would it be fair to say that would be more the responsibility of the Bureau rather than the Agency upon his actual return?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, the question whether or not he was, let us say, a counterintelligence threat.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. KGB agent?\n\nMr. Tovar. That would be a Bureau concern, no question\nabout that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. However, would the Agency make any effort\nto interview Oswald while Oswald was enroute from the Soviet\nUnion to the United States?\n\nMr. Tovar. You are speaking of what the Agency might have\ndone in '63 or '62?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. '62.\n\nMr. Tovar. Again, we are speculating concerning the\nintelligence of the men who were in charge then. Today I\nwould like to think we would be interested in what he is doing.\nAt the time I don't know. I would think, why not. On the\nother hand, I couldn't say they would or should be interested.\nIt was not their primary precise prerogative. I think if they\ncould, as I assume they did, the Bureau would discharge its\nresponsibilities vis-a-vis any American of questionable\npropensity, I should think they would be deferring to the\nBureau.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That would be the aspect of Oswald where\nthere was a concern that he posed a counterintelligence threat.\nWhat about the fact that Oswald may have had positive intelli-\ngence information that would have been helpful to the Agency?\nThat would not be within the jurisdiction of the Bureau?\n\nMr. Tovar. I think in that context it might have been\nappropriate for the Agency, if the assumed the point you made,\nto seek an interview with him. I think the appropriate\nvehicle for that would have been the Domestic Contact Division\nwhich I think handled most of the contacts referred to in this\nmemorandum.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is the function of the Domestic\nContact Division?\n\nMr. Tovar. They are responsible for intelligence that\ncan be checked properly and legally in the United States\nnormally through American businessmen or American persons and\nnonofficials who travel abroad and acquire intelligence of\ninterest. This is not just USSR. It could be any other\ncountry. Their primary field of activity is to contact and\ndebrief on a voluntary basis, if they so choose to respond,\nAmericans who return from overseas.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I notice that the Committee's inquiry\nconcerning the CI's policy as to returning American defectors\nwas routed to your staff, CI Staff. When the memo was prepared\nby the CI Staff for the Committee, was it done with the thought\nof representing the entire agency or just the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. It is difficult for us to presume to speak for\nthe entire Agency. I think on this matter we are speaking for\nthe Directorate of Operations, not for the entire Agency.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Fine. That is really the area with which\nI was concerned anyway, Directorate of Operations.\n\nMr. Tovar. The only other element of the Directorate of\nOperations that would be of an interest in this type of thing,\nwhich might be construed as having an interest in this type\nof activity, would be the SC Division. On this I think the CI staff could be considered as speaking for the Directorate.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is the Domestic Contact Division part of the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. No, part of the Directorate of Operations.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The response of the Agency dated April 20, 1978, which appears in CIA Number 1818, indicates that contact seems to be based on opportunity and circumstance. Then it goes on to say only ten of the 117 persons have had any contact with CIA. Would it be possible for you to go into more detail on what is meant by opportunity and circumstance?\n\nMr. Tovar. In the ascense of a policy, of a guideline, a procedure, internal instruction which says you will debrief Americans who return from having resided in the USSR, in the absence of that, this thing is left to chance obviously. I cannot explain to you how the names of these 11 passed the desk of whoever was in charge at the time, but assuming they did, my guess, and it is really only a guess, would be that the person who read that, whatever document it was, would say, \"Hmph! He looks like he might be interesting\", and perhaps would then get in contact with CCD and suggest if they get in contact with a person, let us say he is known to be living in New York, suggest that they might want to seek out his location and if possible interview him.\nI think it would be a matter of chance in the sense that the analyst or whoever it was who reviewed that document, might react, and yet he or she might not, too, depending on how they woke up that morning. It is sheer whimsy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Let me explain to you why the question whether or not it was standard operating procedure to debrief returning defectors is important to the Committee. Since the assassination of the President, there has arisen a group of researchers who have reviewed the Warren Commission Report and have reviewed releases made under the Freedom of Information Act by the CIA and the FBI.\n\nHaving reviewed these materials the argument has been made that Oswald received unusual treatment at the hands of the CIA. One example of this unusual treatment is that there is no record of Oswald having been debriefed by the CIA upon his return. For that reason, we are focusing on this issue. Is there any way you can give us guidance on how to respond to that question?\n\nMr. Tovar. I can't because I am speculating every step along the way. I would hesitate to say more than Oswald simply didn't connect with whoever happened to be looking -- let us assume his name appeared. Was his name in the list?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No. That is the list of people who were debriefed.\n\nMr. Tovar. One hundred seventeen?\nMr. Goldsmith. I haven't seen the list of 117 people.\n\nMr. Tovar. What is this?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That is a list of 350 odd people I was going to ask you about. However, since you don't have knowledge of the 117, I am not going to ask you about them.\n\nMr. Tovar. If Oswald's name was on the list, I can't explain why he might not have been contacted. Maybe he didn't appear attractive or interesting enough. I don't know what information might have been given with these names on the list, such as a memo from the FBI or State Department, whoever had originated it, what they said that would have titilated the analyst who might have seen it that would have elicited a response on the part of the analyst who would say \"Ah, let us look into this further.\"\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In particular, a lot of focus has been given to Mr. Robert Edward Webster, who appears in CIA Number 1820 who defected approximately the same time that Oswald did and returned at approximately the same time that Oswald did and who was debriefed by the CIA for two weeks in Virginia.\n\nMr. Tovar. I didn't know that he was. It doesn't say so here.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That does not indicate the extend of the debriefing. That information was obtained independently by this Committee.\n\nMr. Tovar. The name means nothing to me so I can't\nenlighten you on it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does the CIA have any affiliation with organizations in the United States who might be responsible for debriefing someone?\n\nMr. Tovar. Not that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In other words, if anyone is going to be debriefed it would be by the Domestic Contact Division?\n\nMr. Tovar. In the intelligence sense. In the sense of elucidation of intelligence, DCD would do it. A different type of inquiry, personal investigation, the Office of Security, or whoever it works through, would be the one.\n\nThe one we are talking about, DCD is the only organization I know of. I can visualize a circumstance under which operating components might seek out an individual or might have in times past but I can't think of a case in point in my own recollection. I would say, given the strictures on our operating in the United States, we would rely upon DCD to do it if they had any positive intelligence connotation. If it were of an operational nature today, the Foreign Resources Division might pursue it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. It is the division level of the Directorate. It is the division which seeks in the United States to develop potential intelligence assets for abroad. I think I had better defer to the other people on that. That is roughly where\nit stands. They certainly would not have interest in debriefing defectors that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In any event, for the purposes of summary, there is today no standard operating procedure of interviewing returning defectors?\n\nMr. Tovar. Right, insofar as I am aware, there is none.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There is no standard operating procedure between the Bureau and the CIA which would coordinate any effort to contact returning defectors and share information?\n\nMr. Tovar. None that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Turning to another area which I would like to get into briefly, would you define what a 201 file is?\n\nMr. Tovar. A 201 file is a file or files -- it could be several volumes to it -- which relates to an individual. It might pose a dicotomy, a 201 file and project file. A project file might deal with an activity, say collection operations in Timbucktu, a broad scale of activity involving several numbers of people, there might be several 201 files, A, B, C, who were associates in that project. The 201 file would be on the individual himself.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Ti would contain primarily biographic information?\n\nMr. Tovar. No. It would contain a much vaster -- some of them might contain one sheet of paper with name, rank and date of birth. But if the association with him developed and\nbecame more extensive, it might contain a considerable amount of information. If he became involved with this operation it might include operational material, intelligence operations as well, all part of the 201 complex.\n\nThe point I am making is that it is an individual file as opposed to an activity file.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. If you wanted to learn about the operations that an individual was involved in, would you go to his 201 file or to his operations file?\n\nMr. Tovar. I would go to the 201 file first. There might not be an operations file. In fact, in the vast majority of the 201 cases there are no operational files because there is no hard and fast rule on when you open a 201 file or who opens a 201 file.\n\nIf I, for example, am overseas and I become interested in a person who looks to me to have considerable promise from the operational standpoint, say a local foreign type, I might give my own local checks, I might examine my own files to see if I know anything about him. Then I say to headquarters \"here is Joe Doe. He is interesting to me for these reasons. Will you please check against headquarters records and other agencies and let me know if you have anything of interest on him.\"\n\nI might not ask for a 201 file. Headquarters might then, because they thought he was interesting, open a 201 file.\n\nConversely, I might likewise say this looks terribly interest-\ning Please open a 201 file and give me all of the information you can collect on him.\"\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that the fact that someone has a 201 file does not mean at all that the individual was involved in any operations of the Agency. If you wanted to get information of an operational nature, would you go both to the 201 file and operations file?\n\nMr. Tovar. Assuming there was information of an operational nature?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, indeed we would.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. If someone is an agent of the CIA -- I am not referring now to case officers or staff agents -- someone is a field agent for the Agency, would that fact be indicated in the 201 file?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In the Directorate of Operations someone might open up a 201 file on an individual if the person was of a potential positive intelligence significance?\n\nMr. Tovar. Or counterintelligence, either one.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That was going to be my question. The CI Staff in particular, when would you have occasion to open a 201 file?\n\nMr. Tovar. CI staff would not necessarily be the only one to open a 201 file. In the case of a person of CI interest,\na field station might have a counter-person I described earlier and become interested in him because he did have some CI attraction or interest. The station itself or the division would open the 201 file. It would not be us. The CI Staff as a rule is not involved in that type of thing.\n\nAt this stage of the game since we are not operating and we are not out soliciting new contacts, we are not working in that sense of the term, we don't to my knowledge originate 201 files.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The CI Staff does not open up 201 files?\n\nMr. Tovar. There is no reason that we couldn't.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As a practical matter?\n\nMr. Tovar. As practical matter it does not work that way. Our research is primarily focused upon established cases, cases that may even be dead, terminated, or dormant, or even current in certain cases, but as a rule not very many. 201 file is opened by someone else. We may examine those files and review them. We do review other activities. But the 201 file would be in existence. They should not be created by ourselves.\n\nIn former days when CI Staff files were segregated from the rest of the Directorate it might have been different. I don't know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When was that?\n\nMr. Tovar. Say prior to 1974, 1957. Today our files are integrated in the files of the Directorate or it is in the\nprocess of being integrated. We have been working on this. This is one of our major final exercises in the past two or three years to make sure, when you go to the central files and research a name, if there is something in the CI Staff repository that will turn up when you are making a check of the index.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Will most 201 files be open as a result of information coming into headquarters from the field, one of the field stations?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, the vast majority. In years before when they has such programs as MH Chaos, I assumed they opened 201 files of their own.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is that?\n\nMr. Tovar. MH Chaos program?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. For the record, will you indicate what that program is?\n\nMr. Tovar. I frankly would rather not because I don't know the precise definition of the program. It was a program which has been described in the press as domestic surveillance. Whether that is the correct proper designation, I don't know. Our CI Staff does not normally open a 201 file. We don't have occasion to.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the term CI/SIG stands for?\n\nMr. Tovar. Counter Intelligence/Special Investigative\nGroup, I think it is. Investigative or investigations, I don't know which.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is that group still in existence today?\n\nMr. Tovar. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did it go out of existence?\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't know exactly. Before my time. I think it ended in '73, '74, '75. I am not sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the function of that group was?\n\nMr. Tovar. Only in a very vague sort of way. I have heard about it, it was the investigative group in the CI Staff that investigated whatever the CI Staff did in those days. I can't speak to that with any first hand knowledge. I know some things they did but I would be hesitant to make a general definition of their function.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the function of that group was to investigate Agency employees who were suspected of having been penetrated?\n\nMr. Tovar. I think, because I have seen nothing in writing on the subject, but I have been given to understand that was one of their functions in the context of their responsibilities that was included. But I am no authority on the subject.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether CI/SIG would have occasion to open a 201 file?\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't know. I can speculate. I don't know.\nMr. Goldsmith. What would your speculation be?\n\nMr. Tovar. I would speculate in the days when they were functioning they probably did. You have a very unauthoritative witness on that subject.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is the relationship if any between the Office of Security and the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. We have basically different functions. The Office of Security is under the Directorate of Administration and is responsible for the personnel and physical security of the entire division. It focuses on personnel security and physical security.\n\nThe CI staff as I described it, is an element of DDO concerned with research and analysis and operation and coordination. The relation between us and the Office of Security is simply that between us and another fraternal element of the Agency which has responsibility which sometimes comes close together.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does the Office of Security maintain files which contain information of a derogatory nature on individuals, not necessarily limited to Agency employees?\n\nMr. Tovar. To my knowledge they don't. My assumption is that I have never seen what is in their files -- my assumption is that they have files only on Agency personnel. I cannot visualize circumstances under which they would maintain information on people who are not in the Agency or who had not been\napplicates for employment and then left.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is the Office of Security interested in maintaining information so that if in the future an individual was being considered for employment in some capacity with the Agency the Security Office would have that information on him?\n\nMr. Tovar. I cannot visualize that happening today.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you to read CIA 0786, which is a document that this Committee obtained from the Office of Security files on Lee Harvey Oswald.\n\nMr. Tovar. That sort of suggests they maintained such information then. I still cannot visualize there doing it today.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you think the function of the Office of Security may be different today from what it was in 1959 with regard to maintaining such files?\n\nMr. Tovar. The function, I would use the term function, I would say the policy of the Office as far as the way the office operates today. I don't know what they do intrinsically. I cannot visualize their maintaining that kind of current records today. Maybe this is historic, it was in the files since 1969. With the injunction against destroying files, the files remained.\n\nIf it was John Q. Doe appearing today in a similar context I would not visualize the Office of Security maintaining this\nkind of document.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. To whom would this document go today?\n\nMr. Tovar. You mean from the State Department?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes, a State Department document. Which is indicating that an American citizen is giving information, intelligence information to a foreign country, to whom in the CIA would that document go?\n\nMr. Tovar. I am not sure it would come to the CIA at all because the CIA does not have responsibility for that type of person. I think it would go to the FBI.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Even though the individual is overseas?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes. He is an American. Again, this is speculation. I don't know what moves the person who releases cables to the Moscow Embassy today. He might decide or somebody here in State Security might decide that CIA should see this. In that event, it probably would go to the Office of Security as a matter of information.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would information contained in this type of telegram normally lead to the opening of a 201 file?\n\nMr. Tovar. I would think not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why not?\n\nMr. Tovar. There is nothing that suggests here this is going to be of continuing interest to the CIA. This is 1959. Let us say in 1962 the man came back and another message came over and it indicated that he was available for discussion.\nor was of interest and so on and maybe there are reasons for\ndebriefing, I can visualize a 201 being opened if the matter\nwere of apparent continuing interest. I can see no reason why\na 201 would be opened in this case.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What if this telegram was followed by a\nable indicating that the individual had decided to defect?\n\nMr. Tovar. What do you mean? He is applying for Soviet\ncitizenship, so he is defecting here?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You are correct. I withdraw the question.\n\nMr. Tovar. I think basically my point is that it is a\nfact that a 201 need not be opened up on this type -- this is\na casual piece of information. If one could eliminate the\nname Lee Harvey Oswald, which raises flags, it is John Doe\nand there is nothing in this -- someone might say what an SOB\nthis is but there is nothing to indicate anything but an\nunfortunate incidental event, I would say today, \"why bother\".\nWe have enough to do without opening 201 files on people of\nthat nature.\" The encyclopedic approach is not one that we\ntry to apply.\n\nBear in mind, I am doing a lot of speculating here. I\nperhaps shouldn't.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You really aren't aware of what the\nprocedure would be in 1959 for dealing with a telegram like\nthis?\n\nMr. Tovar. No. I would still say today I would not expect\nthat kind of document to be retained in Agency files anywhere. You know, inter-departmental correspondence is firing paper in all directions all the time on an informational basis. That does not mean it is retained.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. With regard to this document, after 1959 your testimony is more or less speculation but you are saying that today you don't think that this type of document would be retained and have any special significance?\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't think so. I am scratching my head trying to visualize circumstances under which it could be retained. There is nothing of interest to the Agency. There is nothing of immediate counterintelligence interest. I don't know who would retain it or why.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. For the purpose of clarification, if the CI asked that of the CIA, by that I mean the counterintelligence aspect of the CIA concerned primarily with a foreign counterintelligence threat, in other words, foreign nationals, foreign citizens?\n\nMr. Tovar. You are asking is it?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. Primarily yes, but not solely. We are concerned with Americans of counterintelligence interest. If an overseas station is informed by somebody that an American is contacting the Soviets and is apparently engaged in what looks like espionage, we would become interested. That is\nespionage I am talking about.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand.\n\nMr. Tovar. You realize of course with the sensitivity of Americans investigations of Americans we have to be an we are extremely careful in making the determination as to when a person is of counterintelligence interest. We have very strict rules and regulations on the consideration of investigations, considerations retaining information, the rights of a person. The criteria are very stringent. They are under executive order and Attorney General guidelines. We don't approach this casually at all. It is proscribed activity.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Both as to Americans?\n\nMr. Tovar. Primarily Americans. The Attorney General is not concerned essentially with non-US persons. Our focus of sensitivity is on US persons who are US citizens or residents, aliens or US entities, organizations, which are primarily American in composition.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Again, would you focus outside the-borders of the United States?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes. Inside US is FBI.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Before when you made reference to a station overseas, you became aware of an American who might be involved in espionage for another country, you were referring to an American who was living abroad, is that correct?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, or traveling abroad.\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to show you CIA Number 788 which is the field personality file request form that was used to open Oswald's 201 file. In the middle of the page there is a box which states the term 'Other identification'. If someone wrote the number or letter \"AG\" down, what does that stand for?\n\nMr. Tovar. I have no idea. What are they referring to here? I cannot think of anything.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The form also indicates that Oswald's file was restricted. Do you know of any reason why Oswald's file would have been restricted?\n\nMr. Tovar. Where is that?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Here.\n\nMr. Tovar. No, I don't know. I don't know what criteria they would have used at that time or even today for that matter, to open a restricted file. Bear in mind, there is a lot of latitude given to the individual who opened these things. He could be a very junior analyst who for reasons of his own decided he would do it this way. Supervision would not necessarily get down there very closely behind him.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the inter-agency source register is?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is that?\n\nMr. Tovar. As I understand it, it is a register maintained in which other agencies of the government register their\ninterest in a person. Let us take, for example, you are working for the Army Intelligence and you are in Germany and you become intersted in Mr. Smith. Let us say you check Mr. Smith with the CIA and with the other agencies and in so doing you wish to have him recorded under the ISR, Inter Agency Source Registry, the entry of his name in the ISR will normally flag prior interest on the part of somebody in the government, in this case you are in the Army.\n\nI don't know what this symbol is but they put two asterisks which indicates to anybody else who checks that name later the US Army has a prior interest in that person.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What kind of interest would that be?\n\nMr. Tovar. Intelligence interest to me, potential intelligence interest. Again, the ISR may have ramifications that I am not aware of. In my experience the ISR has been the place we go to check, say, a new or potentially new source to see if there is ny other previously established government interest in the person which means keep your hands off. The military rely upon this very heavily because we coordinate their clandestine intelligence operations.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would an ISR index be checked prior to opening up a 201 file as a matter of routine?\n\nMr. Tovar. It has been so many years since I have done this. The way we have become mechanized today I would assume that a normal file check through the central files of the\nDirectorate would include or would turn up anything that was in the ISR. I am just not sure how it works.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. If someone were an agent of another intelligence organization would that be indicated in the 201 file?\n\nMr. Tovar. If it were an agent, agent of another service, that would be in the ISR only if it had been of interest to another agency which said \"Put John Doe's name in the ISR and indicate he is a US Army intelligence source,\" at the very least a person of interest to the US Army Intelligence Agency. It would not be there if the Army had not put it in. So you might not know.\n\nAgain, I think almost any agent of the military would rely upon the ISR, I would think almost certainly would be entered in the ISR, because they want to maintain control of it, to make sure nobody else gets in the way and interferes with their operations.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. So if someone were an agent it would in all likelihood be indicated in the ISR and assuming the ISR is checked by a CI person prior to opening up the file, he would take note of that fact?\n\nMr. Tovar. Say that again. Some of this is pretty fuzzy to me. I don't want to mislead you by extrapolating from my own ignorance.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. If someone is an agent of another\nintelligence service, that fact would be noted in the ISR?\n\nMr. Tovar. Another US intelligence service?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. A US military intelligence service only, yes, the military intelligence service would normally be registered in the ISR. Other than the military, the FBI intelligence assets would not be registered in the ISR to my knowledge.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. But the military tends to make that list-\ning?\n\nMr. Tovar. In my experience the military has been the primary element involved in the use and the exploitation of the ISR. Let me interpose another point here. I am not an expert in these procedures and I am way out of touch. You live most of your life overseas, you don't do these things back at headquarters. These procedures may be quite different in actuality. I am groping through my memory to see how they were dealt with on an active basis.\n\nA fellow like Bill Donnelly might enlighten you much more than I could about the ISR.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that. I think you can tell I am not pressing you for detail on it.\n\nMr. Tovar. I would like to help you. I am prepared to speculate as I have been doing on things that are somewhat beyond my direct experience and direct responsibility. There is a limit.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Now, if someone checking ISR notes that\nan individual is a military intelligence agent would the fact of that agency status be noted and a 201 file opened on that individual?\n\nMr. Tovar. I am not sure. I would think it would be. Again, I am speculating. I think almost certainly if I were doing a file check on a person whose name came from one of the field stations and it turned up the fact he was already registered in the ISR, if a person is of interest let us say, to the US Army Intelligence, that would automatically sort of proscribe further attempts on my part to go in and get involved. I think a notation would be made in the 201 file.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As a practical matter that would be a good reason for making the notation?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does the CIA regularly use the ISR?\n\nMr. Tovar. We maintain it as I understand it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. So if someone is an agent of the CIA, would that fact be noted in the ISR?\n\nMr. Tovar. No, I don't believe it would. Again, you can check on that to make certain. Donnelly I think can help much better on it. I cannot visualize all our sensitive sources being registered there.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know how internal memoranda prepared by James Angleton when he was head of the CI Staff, how internal\npaperwork relating to the JFK assassination was prepared and subsequently stored?\n\nMr. Tovar. No, I really don't. I have no idea. I have seen no documents on that subject. I have seen nothing either originated or approved or signed by him. You realize that any files on this subject are dead files. I am just doing my current job. Until you people became interested, we were not dealing with them on a daily basis.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What happens to the personal files of an individual such as Angletons or even yourself after leaving the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. After leaving the staff or leaving the Agency?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Let us take the first after leaving the CI Staff, what would happen to your personal papers?\n\nMr. Tovar. The personal file, official file on the person in the Agency is retained by the Office of Personnel.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That would govern your personal file, your personal papers. What about internal memos, soft copy type files, what would happen to them?\n\nMr. Tovar. Having been only one element of the organization during my career, it is hard to say.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I am not talking now about personnel file. I am talking about soft copy, working files that an individual may maintain.\n\nMr. Tovar. You mean the files he himself as an individual\nmaintained?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. Most individuals don't maintain personal files, I don't think. I would say, for example, anything I write, I dictate a memorandum and I send it to anybody you want to name, in a sense that is my work, I have done it but I don't keep a personal file on that. That goes into my office file. It is part of the office chronological file which is maintained by my secretary. Let us say multiply that by 500,000 over a period of years the files grow. At the time I leave I am incidental in a sense. I just happen to be the person in the job at the time. The files will still be there.\n\nThere is a normal retirement and destruction under normal conditions, retirement and destruction program which eliminates the accumulation of excessive useless material.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Most paperwork would go in this office chrono file?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, anything of significance would go in the office chrono file. Anything I write to the Directorate of Operations, DDO, CI, it is normally part of the chrono files. If I want it, it is there. It is my own file in the sense that when I am on the job I have total access to it. If I left the job and wanted to look at it six months later, it is still in the file and I would ask somebody who took my place could I see what I wrote. I would not take it with me.\nMr. Goldsmith. If it is an office chrono file does that mean that everything is filed in a chronological order?\n\nMr. Tovar. Not necessarily. Here you ought to consult my secretary. There might be a subject breakdown. Ordinarily in the front office, we don't main-ain a lot of files. There is no point in it. Let us say something I signed off on, here is a case in point, memos that are signed on my behalf or that I might have signed, if I were there that day, I would not maintain that in my front office as a rule. That would probably be maintained by the office of origination. I think if I signed it my secretary would certainly maintain a log of things that had gone through me for signature. But I don't think, I could be wrong on this, I don't think as a rule she would maintain a routine memorandum just because I happened to sign it because I sign so many things on that staff. I sign off on a host of things which are not really my creation. I am representing the staff as a whole.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know when Mr. Angleton left the CI Staff?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes. I am not certain of the precise date. I think it was either December '74 or January '75. That is the position of Chief, Counterintelligence?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. I believe he may have remained in the office for several months after that before he finally retired.\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether, after Mr. Angleton left the CI Staff, any type of followup was done by that staff on the Nosenko issue?\n\nMr. Tovar. Followup work?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes. For example, one of the issues, the key issue with regard to Mr. Nosenko was his bona fides.\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, indeed.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. After Mr. Angleton left was any additional analytical work done on that issue?\n\nMr. Tovar. A very detailed study was done by my predecessor George Kalaris. A very thorough analysis was made of the whole Nosenko question.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you referring to the Hart Report?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Other than the Hart report was any type of followup work or analytical work done after Mr. Angleton's departure?\n\nMr. Tovar. I don't know for certain. The Hart Report is a thick piece of paper. In the preparation of that report there were probably all kinds of drafts, scratchings and sort of preliminary jobs. All I know would be in the context of that report. All I know would be some representations in response to the Director's inquiry or your inquiry or someone else's inquiry as to what happened, what did it say, what does it mean, that type of thing, but really correlary efforts.\nMr. Goldsmith. Think for a moment on the Nosenko issue.\n\nAs Chief of the CI Staff, if it were demonstrated to you very clearly that the story given by Mr. Nosenko on Lee Harvey Oswald was full of contradictions and in addition to contradictions, it was in many ways simply incredible, what impact would that have on the Agency's assessment of Mr. Nosenko as being a bona fide rather than a dispatched defector?\n\nMr. Tovar. Well, it is difficult to answer. You are posing a question in a narrow sense. You are focusing on one point, Nosenko vis-a-vis Oswald and contradictions that may emerge there. I would answer by saying that again I am not an expert on Nosenko. I don't profess to have a full grasp of his bona fides or anything related to it.\n\nI would say that question alone would not be enough to satisfy me that the inquiry had been made carefully. There is much more to it than what Nosenko had to say about Oswald. There are more aspects about the bona fides issue, more than I could give you today.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I have read the Hart Report.\n\nMr. Tovar. He tried to deal with the whole consideration, the whole Oswald, the handling, the methodology. He did not go into every jot and tittle of the issue.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In fact, the Hart Report did not mention the word \"Oswald\" even one time. Even so, the question I have, if it were demonstrated to you that Nosenko's story on the\nOswald issue is untrue, cannot be believed, would that have any impact on the Agency's assessment of him as a bona fide?\n\nMr. Tovar. The first reaction would be I would be deeply distressed and concerned, I would want to know more about it. You have to extrapolate from me to the Agency. Other people have views on this other than myself. If you carried this thing further and convinced everybody, the point you made is valid, then you would have --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. We are talking hypothetically now. Let us go beyond you. If it were demonstrated to the Director of the Central intelligence Agency that the story given by Nosenko on Oswald -- I am not talking about any of the other information he gave, but on Oswald -- simply cannot be believed because, A, part of it is incredible, B, it is full of contradictions, what effect do you think that would have on the Agency's assessment of him as a bona fide defector?\n\nMr. Tovar. I literally don't know. I am not sure what the comparative weight of that point would be when considered against the backdrop of the full Nosenko question.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As Chief of the CI Staff, you would personally be troubled by that?\n\nMr. Tovar. Yes, I think I would be troubled by it. I would be troubled. I would be troubled that our current assessment is wrong. That would trouble me.\n\nAgain, I would say, too, if this is a serious proposition\nyou are making, let us say you adduced a number of analysts\nwho examined this thing thoroughly and were in a position of\nmaking that kind of judgment, I would say, \"I want to have\nthese analysts talk to my analysts because I am not in a posi-\ntion to make that kind of judgment.\"\n\nMr. Goldsmith. First of all, I am not making the statement\nthat Nosenko's story on Oswald is inaccurate in any way.\n\nSecondly, even if the story is inaccurate, I don't want\nto suggest that because of that anyone on this Committee has\nany feeling that that means Nosenko is not bona fide. My\nquestion is really very limited. A, if it were demonstrated\nthat the story on Oswald is inaccurate, what impact would that\nhave on your overall assessment?\n\nMr. Tovar. You mean demonstrably inaccurate?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Tovar. It would have to be examined. It would have\nto be examined the full panoply of the whole Oswald issue.\nI would say we will get this team of analysts and we will\nfight it out. We are talking about hypothesis.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes. I would prefer to stay away from the\nterm \"fighting it out\" because there is no one here who is in\nthe posture of making a fighting issue out of it.\n\nI no longer have any questions. I will have questions to\nask whoever on your staff participated in the preparation of\nthe memo that we discussed earlier.\nNormally whenever a witness has an opportunity to testify before the Committee at a hearing, the Committee gives him five minutes at the end to make a statement. This is not a hearing. However, if you would like to make a statement for the record, feel free to do so. If not, you will be given a chance to verify the record for accuracy.\n\nMr. Tovar. Since I have no position to present and no point to make it is probably improper to make a statement. The only think I would reiterate is that I have been sort of speculating here in many respects. Bear in mind there is an area here where I have a purview that is perhaps valid. We are talking about a lot of things which are way beyond my immediate experience and certainly my current responsibility.\n\nI would say, take some of my speculation with a grain of salt, because I don't mean to be dogmatic on these things. The procedure for handling the 201 file, there are some GS-7 girls down the line who could tell you much more about the 201 files than I would ever be able to compile for you. They are the ones you really should talk to.\n\nThings like the ISR, I know the ISR in a limited framework from the standpoint of a guy overseas who is dealing frequently with the military and registers military sources in the ISR and checks the ISR either on behalf of the military or to see if they have already registered prior interest and so on. There may be other aspects of the thing that you should get more\nprofessional advice on.\n\nI think your questions have been reasonable. I have found no objection to try to meet you more than halfway on it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Fine. Thank you very much.\n\n(Whereupon, at 3:20 p.m., the deposition was concluded.)\nCERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC\n\nI, Alfred Joseph LaFrance, the officer before whom the foregoing deposition was taken, do hereby certify that the witness whose testimony appears in the foregoing deposition was duly sworn by me; that the testimony of said witness was taken by me in stenotype to the best of my ability and thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction, that said deposition is a true record of the testimony given by said witness; that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which this deposition was taken; and further that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties thereto, nor financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.\n\nNotary Public in and for the District of Columbia\n\nMy Commission expires November 14, 1980.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10325.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 50, "total-input-tokens": 57150, "total-output-tokens": 16512, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 564, 1], [564, 606, 2], [606, 1307, 3], [1307, 2402, 4], [2402, 3623, 5], [3623, 4725, 6], [4725, 6073, 7], [6073, 7446, 8], [7446, 8634, 9], [8634, 9764, 10], [9764, 10898, 11], [10898, 12155, 12], [12155, 13449, 13], [13449, 14611, 14], [14611, 15876, 15], [15876, 17323, 16], [17323, 18501, 17], [18501, 19774, 18], [19774, 21192, 19], [21192, 22555, 20], [22555, 23880, 21], [23880, 25180, 22], [25180, 26475, 23], [26475, 27788, 24], [27788, 29172, 25], [29172, 30333, 26], [30333, 31656, 27], [31656, 32807, 28], [32807, 34023, 29], [34023, 35347, 30], [35347, 36620, 31], [36620, 37900, 32], [37900, 39187, 33], [39187, 40497, 34], [40497, 41774, 35], [41774, 43007, 36], [43007, 44421, 37], [44421, 45670, 38], [45670, 46971, 39], [46971, 48203, 40], [48203, 49475, 41], [49475, 50811, 42], [50811, 52161, 43], [52161, 53381, 44], [53381, 54777, 45], [54777, 56160, 46], [56160, 57500, 47], [57500, 58959, 48], [58959, 59200, 49], [59200, 60051, 50]]}} {"id": "dd66920645ce96cedf36d249bed0f08f413d62cf", "text": "EXECUTIVE SESSION\n\n---\n\nTUESDAY, MAY 16, 1978:\n\n---\n\nU.S. House of Representatives,\n\nSubcommittee on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy of the Select Committee on Assassinations,\n\nWashington, D.C.\n\nThe Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 4:40 p.m. in room 3370, House Annex No. 2, 2nd and D Streets, S.W.\n\nPresent: Michael Goldsmith and Dan Hardway.\n\n---\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Miss Reporter, would you please swear in the witness?\n\nThe Reporter. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony which you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do.\nTESTIMONY OF ROBERT T. SHAW\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you state your name and address for the record?\n\nMr. Shaw. Robert T. Shaw, 3715 Acosta Road, Fairfax, Virginia, 22031.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What is your present occupation, Mr. Shaw?\n\nMr. Shaw. I am undercover with the Department of State, but my actual occupation is Inspector, Office of the Inspector General, Central Intelligence Agency.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I handed you earlier a copy of a letter from the Acting Director of the Central Intelligence, Mr. Carlucci, to the Chairman of this Committee. It corresponds to JFK Exhibit No. 94 in the Committee's hearing record.\n\nHave you had a chance to read that letter?\n\nMr. Shaw. I read it just now.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you understand it?\n\nMr. Shaw. I understand it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I also would like to hand you the Committee's rules and resolutions and ask you at this time to read Rule No. 4 to yourself.\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. I read it over.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that?\nMr. Shaw. I understand it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that you have a right to counsel?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you waive that right to counsel?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not need counsel.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that, under the Committee rules, that you have a right to receive a copy of the statement you are going to give us at this deposition?\n\nMr. Shaw. I should hope so, to check it for accuracy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. However, by virtue of the arrangement that the Committee has worked out with the Central Intelligence Agency, we have been asked to request of Agency employees that they waive their right to receive a copy of the deposition for their own retention. By that, I mean we would certainly be willing to grant you access to the deposition, to correct it in any way necessary, but the Agency has requested that we ask you to waive your right to receive an actual copy of the deposition.\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no problem with that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Thank you.\n\nFor the record, I would like to say that the Committee's mandate is to investigate the assassination of the President. The scope of the mandate includes who killed the President, was there a conspiracy? We are also required to evaluate\nthe performance of the investigative agencies, specifically\nthe FBI and the CIA and to evaluate the work of the Warren\nCommission.\n\nDo you understand that as well?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Prior to coming here today, have you\ndiscussed what your testimony is going to be with any CIA\nemployee?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have not, except to tell them that I was\ngoing to tell the truth when I got over here.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In terms of discussing the substance of\nyour testimony?\n\nMr. Shaw. None whatever.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Have you discussed with any CIA employee,\npast or present, who either has been interviewed by the\nCommittee or has given a statement under oath to the Committee,\nwhat questions were asked of him or her?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you here today voluntarily and\nwithout subpoena?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, how long have you been working\nunder State Department cover?\n\nMr. Shaw. Since approximately the date I came aboard,\nbecause I was promptly sent to the Department of State for\ntraining. That would be March, 1948.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would your State Department file, if reviewed by a member of this Committee, indicate that you were actually a CIA employee?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You do not understand how the cover arrangement would work between the Agency and the Department of State?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have never had anything to do with the setting up of such cover. It would well be that there might be some sort of an indicator or flag, or something in that file that would indicate to a person who knew the ropes that I was not bona fide.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would there be a personnel file on you at the Central Intelligence Agency?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As a matter of procedure, in terms of how you get paid, do you get paid by the Department of State?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. I am under, at the present time, nominal state cover. I actually, as far as the Department of State is concerned, resigned over there in 1973, I believe. At the present time, I am paid by the Agency.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When you were working under cover, were you being paid by State at that time?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes, I was.\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar at all with the literature that has been generated by the assassination of the President and the work done by the Warren Commission?\n\nMr. Shaw. Very little. I just noticed that green book there a minute ago. I have never read that thing.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Book 5, for the record, of the Senate Committee Report.\n\nMr. Shaw. I have seen copies of the Warren Commission Report in various places around the government, but I never read it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When you were working with the State Department in other than a nominal capacity, what was your title?\n\nMr. Shaw. My last title was Special Assistant to the Ambassador and First Secretary of Embassy, Honduras.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you ever work as a consular officer?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes, I did.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When you worked as a consular officer, were you required to fulfill both responsibilities as a consular officer and as a CIA employee?\n\nMr. Shaw. To a certain extent.\n\nFor example, I have never issued a visa. I have issued a passport for another consular officer who accepted the application and I would be on the road in northwestern Mexico and issued the passport to the American citizen concerned.\nI have done a modicum of what we call protection and welfare work. This would usually involve being again on the road, stopping in, for example, in a prison to see if there was an American citizen there, to find out what the story was, why he was there, how he was being treated and that sort of thing, and relay that information to the consular when I got back.\n\nActually, I have not done much consular work. I used the cover on several occasions, but was never emersed into the role to the point where it interfered with my Agency activity.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Normally when somebody is acting under State Department cover, is the person required to hold down two jobs at the same time?\n\nMr. Shaw. It depends on the location of the person. As I understand it, people we have, for example, in the Iron Curtain countries, or the countries of Eastern Europe, do hold down virtually 100 percent full-time State Department, Foreign Service jobs. Some of the people that I have run into in my work as an Inspector for the Office of the Inspector General, notably in the Mid-Eastern countries, have spent much more time on their cover work than I did.\n\nI think that it has to do basically with the permissiveness, or lack thereof, of the operational environment that you are in. In Mexico, it was not necessary to spend much\ntime, at least not for me, on cover duties.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working for the\nOffice of the Inspector General?\n\nMr. Shaw. Since August of 1976.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you have any responsibility in the\nwriting of the 1977 Inspector General Report pertaining to\nthe CIA's handling of the investigation of the Kennedy\nassassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. None whatever.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Has anyone ever interviewed you before\npertaining to the Mexico City situation as far as it pertained\nto Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. It was about that time of '76, some-\nbody interviewed me in the CIA Headquarters building, and I\nthink it was a Senate Committee, but I am not sure. They had\nsome files.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you give your testimony under oath\nat that time?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, not that I remember.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did any CIA person ever interview you\nconcerning Lee Harvey Oswald's activities in Mexico City and\nthe operations of the Mexico City station?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would have to qualify that. We discussed\nthe subject, of course, in Mexico City at the time of the\nassassination, or immediately after the assassination.\nBut I cannot recall that I was ever called in anywhere and asked for my account of what transpired after the assassination.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Headquarters never asked you to come in and give a description, for example, of Oswald's activities, to your knowledge, in Mexico City in 1963?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. I would not have known anything about Oswald's activities anyway.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar with the photograph that was taken in 1963 that was reportedly linked to Oswald and which subsequently turned out not to be a picture of Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. I am familiar with a photograph that was identified by people at the station in Mexico City as possibly being an American-appearing person. I do not know that it was every considered to be Oswald.\n\nI think, if I remember correctly, what they were doing\u2014\n\nMr. Goldsmith. We will get into that. My question is, did anybody from Headquarters ever ask you about that particular photograph or the circumstances surrounding it?\n\nMr. Shaw. Negative.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did anybody from Headquarters ever ask you to give a statement or report as to the manner in which the surveillance operation in Mexico City were undertaken in 1963?\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Where were you serving in 1963?\n\nMr. Shaw. From about the middle of April, I was serving in Mexico City in our station.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How long did you stay in Mexico City?\n\nMr. Shaw. I stayed there until September of 1966.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who was the Station Chief in Mexico City?\n\nMr. Shaw. Winston Scott.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you give us your assessment of his competence?\n\nMr. Shaw. Competence. It is difficult, because I was not looking from on high. He was a brilliant man. He was reputed to have a doctorate in mathematics. He had an uncanny ability to remember numbers and he carried in his head the file numbers of what we called P-files in Mexico City. P stood, I think, for personality. A P number usually was four digits or so, maybe five digits.\n\nAnd he carried all these numbers in his head and he could mark something for such and such a file in black ink -- he always wrote in black ink -- putting the number down. He had a very good memory for numbers.\n\nWinn and I were friendly. We were not close. We were not on the same level at all.\n\nI considered him to be, from my standpoint, a competent,\neffective, Chief of Station.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What type of file-keeping system did he have in effect, without asking you to describe it in detail? By that, my question is directed towards his thoroughness and comprehensiveness.\n\nMr. Shaw. I would say that he probably had one of the most -- let me see -- complete file systems in being in the Agency. I think that he, my personal opinion is that he went overboard, and we had so much stuff back in our files, it was hard to believe the amount of paper we had in there.\n\nHis tendency was not to rely on cross-indexing. If you have a document, this piece of paper means something to you and you want to keep it and it has 15 names on it, he was quite capable of setting up 15 files for the same piece of paper. And we had a tremendous file room.\n\nI often wondered if we needed that much paper. It was very thorough. I am not a technician as far as managing files, but I do know that the people who worked in the file room were kept very, very busy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who were Mr. Scott's chief deputies?\n\nLet me rephrase the question. Upon which individuals did he tend to rely the most?\n\nMr. Shaw. He had one Deputy who was Allen White. As far as reliance on other people, I would say he relied very heavily on Annie Goodpasture -- not in any way in a command\nfunction, but as a Girl Friday.\n\nHe also seemed to think rather highly of a former one-time FBI agent named George Monroe.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What about David Phillips?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. Dave Phillips ran the what we called the CA side of the shop, covert action, mostly propaganda. I came to Mexico City with the understanding that I was going to head up the Cuban shop. Very soon after I arrived there, Dave Phillips was tapped -- it was while we were still in the old Embassy building.\n\nHe was tapped and named the new Cuban Office Chief.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did that happen in October '63?\n\nMr. Shaw. I don't know. I do not remember. But it was not too long after I was there, and I was asked, I think by Dave; I don't remember -- if I had any objections to continuing to serve in Cuba.\n\nI liked Dave, I respected him. I did not feel that I was being hurt, hurt careerwise, to step back and I was very interested in Cuban operations, so I did willingly, let us say, relinquish command, if you want to, of Cuban Ops and I served Dave as one more officer.\n\nLater on, after Dave left, a year or two later, I once again took over the Cuban Ops group.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You were in charge of Cuban Operations at the beginning. Then Phillips took it over at some point and\nthen, after Phillips left, you went back to that position?\n\nMr Shaw. That is right.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Our review of Agency records indicates that Phillips would have assumed that position on October of '63. Would that be consistent with your recollection?\n\nMr. Shaw. My recollection would have been, had you not told me this based on your review of the files, that it took place earlier than October, but I do not know. I really do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. My questions are going to be confined, unless I indicate to the contrary, to the period up to the end of 1963. So, from the time of your arrival in Mexico City until the end of 1963, prior to the time that Mr. Phillips assumed the position of Cuban operations --\n\nMr. Shaw. Chief.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Chief would be the word, and you had those responsibilities, what did those responsibilities include?\n\nMr. Shaw. Since it was not ratified to me upon my arrival that I was, indeed, Chief of Cuban Ops, I simply considered myself to be one more case officer working against the Cuban target. Our basic interest was in effecting penetrations of the Cuban government.\n\nWhat we wanted most of all were effective penetrations of the Cuban Embassy, the Cuban Intelligence Service, and some possible line-in to their communications set-up.\nMr. Goldsmith. In 1963, did you manage to place any penetration agents in the Cuban Embassy or consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. Did I?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did the station?\n\nMr. Shaw. There were two. I did not place either one, and I think they both pre-dated 1963.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Were those two penetration agents within the Cuban consulate or Embassy at the time of the President's assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. One was in the consulate -- LITAMIL-7 was the cryptonym. L-I-T-A-M-I-L-7. And the other one was in the Embassy -- L-I-T-A-M-I-L-9.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What information did these people give you after the assassination pertaining to the possible involvement of the Cuban government?\n\nMr. Shaw. I did not handle LITAMIL-7, and LITAMIL-9. I did handle,\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who handled LITAMIL-7?\n\nMr. Shaw. I think that it was Ray Swider, but I am not sure. I did not meet LITAMIL-7 until Ray Swider left the country.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You nevertheless have had access to the information that this individual gave to Swider?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would normally have seen copies of contact reports which were reports that we wrote -- any of us who were\ncase officers wrote -- after station meetings, and it would have been normal for me, for example, to see any information of consequence that LITAMIL-7 produced, just like it would have been normal for any other case officer in the Cuban section to see my contact reports on meetings with LITAMIL-9.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In light of that, do you know what information LITAMIL-7 gave concerning the Cuban government's reaction to the death of the President?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not recall, and I do not recall the specifics of anything. You may have something in your files with my name on it; I do not know what LITAMIL-9 produced. I do have the recollection of the sense of feeling on the part of those people that there was no exultation or jubilation or happiness whatsoever inside the Cuban Embassy at the assassination of President Kennedy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did the penetration agents ever indicate that Oswald had been to the Embassy and had stated that he was going to attempt to kill the President?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, not that I know of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did any of those agents ever indicate that Oswald had had contact with the Agency -- with the Embassy, rather?\n\nMr. Shaw. I should imagine that LITAMIL-7 probably did -- I do not recall it. But since she was in the consulate, and --since it was my understanding that Oswald's contact with the\nconsular field rather than with the Embassy field, I should imagine, given the discussions that undoubtedly took place in the Cuban Embassy after this assassination, that she probably spoke about it. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What was the name of LITAMIL-7?\n\nMr. Shaw. I'd rather not give names.\n\n(Discussion off the record.)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, in light of your response, I am certainly aware of the sensitivity of this issue and of your concern for sources and methods, and I would also make two points. One is that under the letter, you are free of your secrecy obligation. At the same time, I am not about to rely upon that letter to compel an answer out of you, because you are here voluntarily today to help us. And, as I said, because I understand your concern for a sensitive source in this case, I am not going to ask you to state for the record the name of either one of these individuals.\n\nMr. Shaw. May I say something at this point?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Shaw. It is my understanding that both of these people are, if they are still alive, are living in Mexico and I do not want to be in a position of revealing a name which could harm either of those people. I notice here that it says--\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You are referring now to the letter from Mr. Carlucci?\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\n\"To provide the affected person the opportunity to receive guidance from me or my designees on the applicability of this authorization, particularly to questions which are asked.\"\n\nI would like to get Frank Carlucci to tell me that I would reveal two names of agents, if it is necessary -- or you can find out from the file, probably, who they are.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I understand your position. I want to make sure you understand mine. I am in no way forcing you to reveal a name. Once you had demonstrated a reluctance to, then, as far as I was concerned, then the matter was terminated.\n\nMr. Shaw. No problem?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I will say that we will pursue this by contacting the appropriate people at the Agency.\n\nMr. Shaw. I think if you requested the Agency for those two names, it would probably produce them. I wouldn't want to be the guy to say it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand your position perfectly. I hope you understand mine.\n\nMr. Shaw. I do.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would not want you to go back to the Agency and say that the staff of this Committee attempted to compel an answer out of you.\nMr. Shaw. I will not say any such thing.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Fine.\n\nFor the record, would you spell the cryptonyms of these penetration agents?\n\nMr. Shaw. One of them was LITAMIL-7 -- L-I-T-A-M-I-L - 7.\n\nThe other was LITAMIL-9.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are these two agents still active?\n\nMr. Shaw. Neither one is active. I am quite sure that neither one is active.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, LITAMIL-7, was that agent working out of the consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. That agent was an employee of the consular section of the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City. LITAMIL-9 was an officer of the Embassy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, on the question of the identity of these two agents, when you go back to the Agency, could you raise this question with the appropriate individual, appropriate superior authority, and we will do the same so that some time this week we can get together on that?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not see any reason for us to get together. You can get it from them, I am sure. It is just that I have a rather strong feeling about protecting anybody who has cooperated with us.\n\nIt is not that I consider you do not have a right to that information, if you feel that you need it. It is just that I\ncannot bring myself to reveal the true name of an agent unless I am required to do so.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that concern. I certainly respect it.\n\n(Pause)\n\nI have been informed by my researcher, Dan Hardway, that the Agency is in the process of looking into this issue.\n\nMr. Shaw. Okay.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like to get into the area of the telephone taps that were in operation in 1963 against the Cuban Embassy and consulate. My first question is, what responsibility, if any, did you have with regard to the telephone tap operation?\n\nMr. Shaw. No responsibility. I saw the product, usually.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who was the individual who was in charge of that tap?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know whose responsibility it was. I rather suspect that it may have been Ann Goodpasture's, but I do not know for sure. I do not remember.\n\nThere were two telephone operations, two tap operations. One of them was unilateral and one of them was joint with the Mexican government.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Which one was the unilateral one? By that, I mean which phones were covered by the unilateral one?\nMr. Shaw. There was a mix, and I cannot recall which\nwere which. It may well have been that we were tapping some\nCuban Embassy phones unilaterally, and some of them were being\ntapped jointly. I know that there was coverage on the joint tap\noperation, which I believe was called LIENVOY. I am not sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That is correct.\n\nYou indicated that you think Ann Goodpasture may have been\nresponsible for the telephone tap operation against the Cuban\noperation. What basis do you have for that?\n\nMr. Shaw. Responsible in the sense of picking up the take.\nI am not sure of that, because I know she did some of that kind\nof work. I am not sure who did it. We used to get copies of\nthe transcripts and I remember -- I am sure I saw some of the\nCuban stuff on joint taps. And then, of course, taps that\nwere run by the Mexican government.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you review the transcripts that came\nin as a matter of regular routine?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you read all of them?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Which ones would you read?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would have been interested primarily in the\nCuban ones, and what they called the resuma -- it was sort of\na Spanish word for resume -- the resuma was a distillation,\nif you will, of the digest of the joint tap that was prepared,\nI believe, for the Mexican President. You look at the resum\u00e9, which may be two pages, and you may have the gist of what might be a whole bunch of pages of tap.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Normally, you read transcripts of conversations that took place on telephones of the Cuban Embassy, is that correct?\n\nMr. Shaw. Normally, I read some of that stuff. I do not remember whether I saw it all or not, because quite a bit of it was processed by other people. I do not know who they were, people on the outside, I suppose. And I read summaries of what appeared on these things, but I remember also, at times, seeing the verbatim -- Man Outside says so and so; Person Inside, Woman Inside, says such and such.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Sometimes you would get summary transcriptions of the summary conversations or English and sometimes you would get verbatim translations, is that correct?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. I would see them, I would not get them. They would go past me. I would see them.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was it more likely that what you would see in verbatim form, conversations that took place, for example, in Russian and had to be translated before you received them?\n\nMr. Shaw. I certainly would not see any conversations in Russian, because the Cuban Embassy did not have any Russian conversations. I cannot really answer that question. I am not really sure I fully understand it. I do remember seeing\na variety of take, what we call take, from the various tap\noperations. This take sometimes was processed into English.\nThe stuff that appeared in the resum\u00e9 was in Spanish. Sometimes\nthe conversations were typed out in Spanish and translated into\nEnglish. I prefer them in Spanish, because I am at home in\nSpanish.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How many people reviewed the take from\nthe surveillance operation of the Cuban Embassy and consular\ntelephones?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea. I assume there were quite a\nfew. The stuff was widely passed around.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, how many people\nwould review them?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How many people were in Cuban operations?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would guess five or six.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who were they?\n\nMr. Shaw. Dave Phillips.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. We are talking now about the period 1963?\n\nMr. Shaw. That is right. Dave Phillips, myself, Ray\nSwider. I am trying to think of the girl's name. We had\nvarious secretaries in there. I do not know who was the secre-\ntary in '63. Peggy Magert. I'm not sure she was there at\nthat time.\n\nOf course, Allen White would see it. Winn Scott would see\nMr. Goldsmith. They would not review every transcript or summary that came in, would then? Allen White or Winn Scott?\n\nMr. Shaw. I imagine Winn Scott; I do not know about Allen White. Winn was pretty much, he tended to review almost all of the paper that came in and out of the station.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you saying that there was no routine procedure established for who was to review the take from the Cuban telephone surveillance operations?\n\nMr. Shaw. I am saying that, when I got there, the case officers in Cuban Ops saw this stuff that was routed around through the station and that persisted during the time that I was there.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I am not sure that the answer --\n\nMr. Shaw. How that was routed, I am not sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you customarily see every conversation that came in?\n\nMr. Shaw. I doubt it. I doubt it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who would have seen the conversation and decided that it was not important enough to merit your attention?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who brought in the take from these operations to the station?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know that either, but it was my\nunderstanding that non-official cover people on the outside picked up the tapes -- don't consider this gospel, but this is my understanding -- picked up tapes from the various listening posts, some of which had been processed by people in the listening post; some of which had not. But they, in turn, either processed those tapes or took them to people to continue the processing in case they had a foreign language in them, or something, and then turn them over to the station.\n\nSomebody went out from the station, probably with a little attache case or something, and picked up takes again. It is my understanding that the person primarily involved in that was Ann Goodpasture, but I do not know for sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who was the first person that the transcripts would go to upon their arrival at the Embassy?\n\nMr. Shaw. I rather suspect Winn Scott, because I remember great numbers of those white pages that came across our desk had P numbers written on them in black ink by Winn Scott.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know how many lines were being tapped at the Cuban consulate and Embassy?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You reviewed the transcripts and summaries of these conversations for two years and you have no idea how many lines were tapped?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. This was fifteen years ago. I can give you a guess.\nMr. Goldsmith. Sure. A best guess would be helpful.\n\nMr. Shaw. I would guess three or four lines. The primary interest was in the Soviets. You had far more converage.\n\nThat is a guess.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Understood.\n\nMr. Shaw. I would guess, off-hand, two lines in the Embassy, one line in the consulate.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know if the Cuban consul's telephone was tapped?\n\nMr. Shaw. If the consulate line was tapped --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. It would have been his?\n\nMr. Shaw. Probably it would have been his, but they may have had a direct line in there. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How would a telephone tap actually work? I am talking now about the actual mechanics of the tap.\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I never had anything do do with them. I know they used to take some of their taps at what they call the junction boxes. These would be the boxes out in the street where lines came in to be fed into this central -- I would rather suspect that the joint operations were mostly done at the central, since the Mexican government simply could have issued orders, you will tap such and such a phone.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. My question is oriented towards the following. Once a tap has been placed on a line, would that\nmean that all calls, ingoing or outgoing, on that phone would be picked up, so long as the tap is in effect?\n\nMr. Shaw. So long as it is in effect, yes. Whether those would appear in the transcripts is another matter. If it was like a wrong number, or somebody saying pick up three rolls and bring them home for lunch, probably it would not appear on the transcript.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who would make that decision?\n\nMr. Shaw. Whoever transcribed the tapes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How much time would pass from the moment that a call came in until the transcription passed across your desk?\n\nMr. Shaw. I cannot answer your question with any precision. There was a system in the Embassy whereby if you had a fast-breaking situation, or something like that, you could -- I sure would like to get the transcripts of such and such a line fast, and that information would be processed and funneled back in to the Embassy or into the station on a priority basis.\n\nI would guess, offhand, that it ran -- again, this is a guess -- five, six, seven days.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What about the high priority cases?\n\nMr. Shaw. Sometimes you can get that pretty fast.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Within a day?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. We could have somebody looking for a\ncertain call, and I do not recall ever doing that. But it was my understanding that if you expected some situation, that you could levy a requirement -- for example, let me give you a for instance here.\n\nLet us suppose that we, the station, someone in the station was going to make a recruitment pitch to a Soviet officer. It would have been possible for the station to have organized things so that there was a live body and not just a machine hanging over phone calls coming in to the Soviet Embassy in case the guy called up and said, let me tell you the discussion I just had, or something like that.\n\nThis would be a little far-fetched, because a Soviet would not be likely to handle it by phone. But in a case where you are looking for something fast-breaking to protect yourself, being on top of the situation -- it would not apply much to Mexico, but if you had a revolutionary situation breaking out someplace, surely there is a possibility of getting information very quickly off any given line.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would the transcripts be reviewed by you in chronological order?\n\nMr. Shaw. I got them in batches and I would review them just in the order in which they came. I might have shuffled them in chronological order, yes. Quite often they came in four or five or six pages stapled together.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would they tend to come in chronological\norder so you read a transcript from the 15th before the 16th?\n\nMr. Shaw. Generally yes, right.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What happened to the transcripts after they were reviewed by you?\n\nMr. Shaw. They were usually routed. They had a routing sheet on it, and they would go on to somewhere else. Where they went, I do not know. Sometimes we would mark them for files. Of course, if there were a transcript in there that had specific information on somebody that we were interested in, we would mark a copy for the files and it would go into that person's -- either their P-file, which was their personnel file, or into any operational self-file that would we make, building up background information on a person, the little things like whether an officer's wife was unhappy with the maid or with living conditions or the cost or what have you of the drugstore. These little bits and pieces were built up and those came from transcripts.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would these transcripts eventually get sent to headquarters?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I will say that it was unlikely that Winn Scott ever threw anything away. It was somewhere, probably, in the file room.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What about the tapes? What would happen with the tapes after a conversation had been transcribed?\n\nMr. Shaw. Again, you are getting into an area where I\nnever had any personal experience. It is my understanding that tapes were erased and reused, and they were used over and over again. Otherwise, we would have ended up with a room full of tapes and there really was no reason to keep them.\n\nNow, I would also assume that if there was something important on a tape that they might have held it. I do not know. I do not recall ever saying, hold that tape for me. The transcript usually sufficed as the record.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know if, at the time of the assassination, that the station had a tape recording of Lee Harvey Oswald's voice?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not know if they did. I think they did not. It was my understanding that what they had was a transcript of some guy calling, again, it is my understanding. I believe he called the Soviet Embassy from the Cuban Embassy, or the Cubans called the Soviet Embassy, I am not sure. But as far as having the tape with Oswald's voice on it, I seriously doubt it.\n\n(Discussion off the record.)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to show you now what was marked here as CIA No. 197 and, for purposes of the record and for your information, the Agency has provided us with its documents. Each page has been assigned a number. The reason it has been assigned a number is so that the Agency can make sure that everything given to the Committee is returned. For\nreference purposes, we simply use those numbers for a witness when we are going through this pile of materials.\n\nNow I would like you to take a look at CIA No. 197, the second paragraph.\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. Okay.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The second paragraph indicates that the station is unable to compare the voices, as the first tape was erased prior to the receipt of the second call.\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does that suggest to you that at least one tape was still in existence on November 23rd, the date that this cable was sent? Otherwise, the second paragraph would have said the tapes had been erased, routinely, whatever.\n\nMr. Shaw. It could indicate that. It does not definitely state that. That is an interpretation, certainly.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does that refresh your memory as to whether or not there was a taping system?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not have anything in writing. This did not refresh my memory at all. This probably would have been considered. Was this after the assassination?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not think it necessarily indicates, but I am surprised that it does not say that they were both destroyed, or both erased.\nMr. Goldsmith. Please take a look at CIA 208.\n\nMr. Shaw. 208.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. And read paragraph number four. Read it to yourself, please.\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. According to paragraph number four, it indicates that it seems a voice comparison of some kind was made.\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes, or it could well be that this guy, Fineglass --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tarasoff?\n\nMr. Shaw. Remembered the poor Russian of the first tape and the poor Russian of the second tape and figured that it was the same guy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How long were tapes normally retained prior to being erased?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea. It would seem to me if you had a very productive tape, you probably would not keep it very long, once you transcribed it.\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like you to read the CS comment on CIA 239.\n\nMr. Shaw. I have read it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. According to that, it indicates that the\nnormal time lag would be two weeks. In other words, the tapes would normally be retained for a two-week period.\n\nMr. Shaw. That is what it seems to say, yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is that consistent with your memory now, at the time?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not have any idea. I was not involved in tape pick-ups or tape erasures.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The Oswald telephone calls, as we will see later on, came in within approximately four days of each other, if, as CIA 239 indicates, the tapes were normally retained for two weeks prior to being routinely erased. Does that suggest to you that the Oswald tape was, for some reason, treated in an unusual manner, because either the first call came in, let's say September 27th. By the time the second call came in, the first tape had already been erased.\n\nMr. Shaw. No, it does not suggest that to me. \u2014 what is this number here \u2014 because this message came out 9 December 63. What it suggests to me is that, subsequent to the assassination, is that the station was to hold tapes for a minimum of two weeks.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Please read into the record what 239 says.\n\nMr. Shaw. CS comment: station to erase routine tapes, Soviet Embassy, keeping normal two week lag.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does that suggest to you that the normal lag would not be two weeks?\n\nMr. Shaw. This was not addressed to me.\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that.\n\nMr. Shaw. There is no reason for me to read this anymore than there is reason for you to read that. The words stand by themselves.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. That is right, and you have just given an interpretation of those words, suggesting that that the meaning is prospective in intent. In other words, after December 9, 1963, the timelag for retention of tapes prior to erasure would be two weeks.\n\nMr. Shaw. I think it could read that, yes. I do not know what went on between Winn and the station as far as periods for keeping these, but I think what you are trying to do is lead me into a situation of pointing out that the station was remiss in destroying tapes, and I do not believe that is the case.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to indicate to you, and also for the record, that what I am trying to do here is go over questions that are raised by the documents and the Committee has no predisposition, one way or the other, to reach any particular conclusions.\n\nThe truth is that unless these questions are asked of you, both the Agency and the Committee will be criticized by people in the future who review these documents and say, why were not these questions asked of you.\n\nMr. Shaw. I can understand why you are asking the questions. I am simply not in a position to tell you, from memory\nor anything else what the normal station procedure was regarding retention of tapes, although, as I did indicate earlier, that the tapes were routinely erased and used over again. As far as the time lag, you know as much about it, and probably more than I do, by now.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What responsibility, if any, did you have with regard to the photo-surveillance operation against the Cuban Embassy and consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. I had no responsibility for that operation until after I reassumed the Cuban Ops section which would have been the day Phillips left for Mexico, probably a year or two down the road. I do know, however, that the operation -- there was a Cuban photo, or a photo operation against the Cuban Embassy.\n\nI do not remember why, but I think that observation was not active in the period when Oswald was in Mexico. If I remember correctly, the man, to the best of my knowledge who handled that, who was actually the inside case officer, if you will, was the little guy who was snapping the pictures, was a fellow by the name of Robert Zambarnadi, and I believe he is retired and living in Mexico. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who was the station case officer responsible for running the photo-surveillance operation against the Cubans?\n\nMr. Shaw. As far as I know, it was Robert Zambarnadi,\nwho was the technical officer of the station. He was a technically qualified man.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There was no one overseeing him?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not believe so, but maybe Dave was. I do not know. We used to get batches of pictures. One of the things that I would do with the agent that I mentioned earlier was that I handled was take batches of these pictures to him and sit down with him and say, did you ever see this guy, or who was that? And he'd say, that's a courier, or that's the new officer who just arrived, or I do not know who this guy was, but he came in and talked to so and so, that sort of thing.\n\nWe used to try to identify people with those pictures.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How many photo bases were there taking pictures of the Cuban consulate and Embassy?\n\nMr. Shaw. To the best of my knowledge, there was only one photo base. At times, the consulate was not covered and the Embassy was. If I may draw you a picture, this would be the block, the compound block. The Cuban Embassy was the big building up here, and there was a little gatehouse down here. I do not remember whether it was in or out.\n\nThis was the consulate, on the corner. People who would want to get visas would routinely appear here and they would send them down the street and they would go into the consulate. Sometimes they knew where they were going and they came in here,\nor they asked a cab, take me to the Cuban consulate, they\nwould probably be delivered here.\n\nThis is a block, a city block. The house from which the\nphotographs were taken is over here on this corner. The\nphotographs were taken long distance down here and here. This\nwas not always covered. This was considered more important,\nbecause it was routine -- either there was a lot of routine\nvisa stuff here.\n\nLater on, subsequent -- gosh, it must have been a year\nlater. I do not remember just when -- we developed a system,\nor somebody up here in the states who developed a system\nwhereby the camera would be triggered automatically. That is\nmovement -- sort of like a photo-electric cell or something --\nmovement up here in the picture that the camera was to cover\nwould cause a series of photos to be taken, maybe four or\nfive, zap, zap, zap, something like that.\n\nBut I believe that, at the time Oswald was in Mexico City,\nnot only was this down for some reason and not functioning,\nbut I believe, had it been functioning, that it would have\nbeen individual picture snapping. I do not think that auto-\nmatic equipment was in Mexico at that time. I could be\nwrong.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I am not going to be able to introduce\nthis diagram into the record, so I am just going to describe\nit as best as I can.\nYou indicated that on one block, on one corner of that block was a consulate building for the Cubans. The other side of the block was the Embassy building.\n\nAcross the street was the photo base.\n\nMr. Shaw. This was all wall. This was a compound.\n\nExcuse me, if I may interject. There was another building back here that had a theatre downstairs and had offices upstairs.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was that within the compound also?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Three buildings within the Cuban compound?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The photo base was located across the street. If was closer to the consulate than it was to the entrance of the Embassy?\n\nMr. Shaw. That is correct.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. From the diagram that you drew, it would seem that the location of the camera was closer to the consulate than it was to the Embassy entrance, yet you also indicated that most of the people of interest would have been entering the Embassy, not the consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. That is correct.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was not the placement of that camera in an inappropriate position?\n\nMr. Shaw. I imagine that camera was placed wherever we could get it. Getting real straight across from one of those\nembassies was very difficult.\n\nI know, had we had our druthers, we would have placed that camera closer up here and the Soviet Embassy had a similar sort of situation, a camera over here and one down here. I believe the closer the better, yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How many photo bases were there operating against the Soviet compound, without drawing a diagram?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know, but I think there must have been two or three.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Are you sure you were not the case officer overseeing the surveillance operation against the Cubans?\n\nMr. Shaw. I certainly am.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. So Mr. Zambarnardi was not working under you?\n\nMr. Shaw. I did not consider him working under me, at that time. Later on, when he was replaced and I am not sure whether Dave Phillips was there or not, I did move into this operation. I am trying to think of the cryptonym for the operation. I cannot recall.\n\nAnd the chap who then handled it was Zambarnardi's replacement, I think his name was Humphrey. That was the surname. Lou Humphrey, I think. I am not sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What was the purpose of the photo-surveillance operation?\n\nMr. Shaw. Primarily to identify people in touch with the\nforeign embassy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would everyone's picture be taken?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, no way.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Whose picture would be taken?\n\nMr. Shaw. For example, that you would normally in an operation like this be limited by time available for the photographer. You would be limited by daylight. You would not photograph a milkman, or a mailman or somebody who would be there repeatedly. You would not photograph a staffer of the Embassy if once you knew who he was, unless he was walking with somebody.\n\nYou would not photograph a regular visitor to the Embassy, if you knew who he was.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you photograph all foreigners?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I would have to say the answer is no. I never photographed any of them. Do you mean would all foreigners be photographed? I would say, given the limitations that I have enumerated, namely how long a person can sit there and watch, and they have to take a break now and then, daylight, Sundays they probably did not photograph because there is little activity. I am sure there were considerable down periods in this sort of operation.\n\nNo, I would say all foreigners were not photographed.\n\nIdeally, you would like to have a picture of anybody who went in and out of there, surely.\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand that.\n\nMy question is, while surveillance base was in operation, would a primary purpose of it be to take pictures of foreigners?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes. That would have been a primary purpose. Not necessarily foreigners, but people you do not recognize. Foreigners or Mexicans; Mexicans are foreigners to us, of course.\n\nAnother thing they did, by the way, was they tried to photograph the license plates of automobiles that came to these embassies.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. During what hours were these photo bases in operation?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I would say most likely during business hours and proper daylight conditions, when the photographer was available to do the job.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you read back that answer?\n\nThe Reporter: \"Question: \"During what hours were these photo bases in operation?\"\n\nAnswer: \"I do not know. I would say most likely during business hours and proper daylight conditions, when the photographer was available to do the job.\"\n\nMr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, when would photographers have been available to do the job?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I was not involved in these operations. I used to see quite a bit of coverage.\nMr. Goldsmith. What were your primary responsibilities when you were down there? You were not involved in the photo-surveillance operation; you were not involved -- excuse me for interrupting you.\n\nMr. Shaw. Go ahead.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You were not involved in the photo-surveillance operation and you were not involved in the wire tap operation, so, my question is, what was your primary responsibility?\n\nMr. Shaw. My primary responsibility was to try to effect penetrations of the Cuban government. I spent a good bit of time with Cubans of the non-Castro persuasion, attempting to identify Cubans of the Castro persuasion that we might go after.\n\nBy \"go after,\" I mean attempt to recruit.\n\nI spent a lot of time collecting information from the Cuban asset on the outside to process into the intelligence reports on what was happening in Cuba.\n\nWe had a system set up in Mexico City under an agent called AMSAIL who was the representative of the exile community. He would arrange to meet, help, debrief, Cubans who were arriving constantly from Cuba on the way to the United States or to Mexico or to somewhere else in the world, people who were exiting Cuba.\n\nMexico did not break relations with Cuba as did the other\ncountries of the Hemisphere. The OAS recommended that; Mexico did not do it.\n\nSo, when the refugee flow dried up in Florida, we probably had one of the most productive operations there in Mexico City regarding information on what was going on in Cuba.\n\nI spent a lot of time with AMSAIL on that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you ever try to recruit Eusbio Ascue?\n\nMr. Shaw. His name is Eusbio Ascue.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nMr. Shaw. A-s-c-u-e. First name, E-u-s-b-i-o.\n\nI did not try to recruit Ascue. That may have been attempted prior to my arrival, in which the man who would know about it, if it had been attempted, would be Mr. Thomas Hazelit.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What about Teresa Proenza?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I never made any attempt to recruit Teresa Proenza.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know if anyone ever did?\n\nMr. Shaw. I know we had an officer in Washington who had formerly served in Mexico City who was very interested in Teresa Proenza. That officer's name was Charles Anders.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is he still with the Agency?\n\nMr. Shaw. It is my understanding that he is.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What about Guillermo Ruiz?\n\nMr. Shaw. That does not even ring a bell. Ruiz is a\nvery common Spanish name. Do you want to tell me who he is or if you have anything on him? Maybe it might ring a bell.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Apparently, Mr. Ruiz was a Cuban intelligence officer at the Embassy, Cuban Embassy.\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not recall him there when I was there.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What did you say that Mr. Ray Swider's responsibilities were, if you said?\n\nMr. Shaw. I did not say. I used his name -- he was another officer, like I was, in Cuban operations.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether he had anything to do with the photo operation.\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. He may have; I do not know. I do not think he did. He may have.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. After your arrival in Mexico City, did anyone attempt to recruit Ascue?\n\nMr. Shaw. As far as I know, there was no attempt made to recruit Ascue after my arrival. My memory could be playing tricks on me. I know I never went after him.\n\n(A brief recess was taken.)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like to get into the number of people who were in Cuban Operations in October of '63, September, October of '63. Could you tell me again how many?\n\nMr. Shaw. If you could show me a list of the people at the American Embassy at that time, I think I could pretty well quickly, in the station -- if you have such a list, I probably\ncould very quickly identify those that had some connection with Cuban Ops.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The Agency has not given us that list today to have for this purpose.\n\nMr. Shaw. Do you have one lying around?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No.\n\nSo far, according to my recollection of appearances, we have Mr. Phillips, yourself and Mr. Swider.\n\nMr. Shaw. When I arrived there, Tom Hasbrook would have been there. He would have been gone by that time.\n\nJohn Zamb\u00e9rdi would have been involved in the technical ops.\n\nI am not sure whether Peggy Magret was there or not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How many case officers were there in Cuban operations?\n\nMr. Shaw. Probably just three, three or four, I am not sure.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There were three case officers, probably four?\n\nMr. Shaw. At least three, yes. Dave and Ray and myself.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was there a fourth?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I cannot recall, offhand, who else was there.\n\nWait a minute. Lorna McKay was there, as a researcher -- what was it called? Research analyst.\nMr. Goldsmith. I am interested now only in case officers. I do have a list here, referred to as CIA 169-70, which has a list of Agency employees. Would you please examine that list?\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. Okay.\n\nPerhaps there would have been myself, Ray Swider, Dave Phillips and Lorna McKay.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was Lorna McKay a case officer?\n\nMr. Shaw. Lorna McKay was not considered -- yes, I guess she was a case officer. I do not know what cases she handled. She did more of what we call INTEL analyst work. She had officer rank, I believe. I believe she was a GS-9 or -11 or something. I do not remember.\n\nBut Peggy, the girl I mentioned awhile ago, was not there until 1965. That was about it.\n\nThe ranking would have been David Phillips, myself, Ray Swider, Lorna McKay.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How did you divide up your responsibilities?\n\nMr. Shaw. Let me interject. Jack Stewart was there, but he was not in Mexico City. He was in Yucatan, in the consulate.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Fine.\n\nHow did you four divide up your responsibilities?\n\nMr. Shaw. We were given certain agents to handle and we handled those agents, and Dave Phillips would decide what\nother activities he would pass around. I notice --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Which were those other activities?\n\nMr. Shaw. Anything that might come to light that Dave would -- an ad hoc requirement, or something like that, he might ask any of us to help out, or somebody else might ask us to do something. I went out and helped surveil a meeting one time for one of these guys down here. It had nothing to do with Cuban Ops.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What procedures did the four of you establish for reviewing photographs?\n\nMr. Shaw. The only procedure that was established was route the photographs and show them to any agent, personnel, who might be in a position to identify the persons in the photographs.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did any of you identify all the photographs in the Cuban Operation Branch?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was there a system to this?\n\nMr. Shaw. If there was, I did not set it up. When I got photographs, I would show them to LITAMIL-9 and have him tell me who they were and I would write a contact report and submit it to my Chief, who was Dave Phillips.\n\nI would assume that Ray Swider probably did the same thing with his agents.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, unless there was a system for\nreviewing the photographs, you had no way of knowing that all of the photographs were being reviewed by you and other Cuban Operations case officers?\n\nMr. Shaw. I had no way of knowing. I was seeing all the photographs, that is true. I assumed I did.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You had no way of knowing that?\n\nMr. Shaw. Not unless I would have gone to pick them up from the man who took them and developed them, which I did not do.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. With regard to the transcripts, did you have any procedure for insuring that all of the transcripts were being reviewed?\n\nMr. Shaw. Did I have a procedure? No. The station routed the transcripts to the various officers. Winn Scott quite often routed them. I notice you had a transcript somewhere here --\n\nMr. Goldsmith. We will look at the transcripts later on.\n\nMr. Shaw. Winn Scott quite often routed those to a specific officer.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Were all of the transcripts pertaining to Cuban operations that were sent to the station reviewed by at least one of the Cuban operations case officers?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Was Mr. Scott a very demanding man?\n\nMr. Shaw. What do you mean by \"demanding\"?\nMr. Goldsmith. Did he expect his employees to work hard and to perform thorough, competent work?\n\nMr. Shaw. I assume he did. He never said so in so many words.\n\nIt was my understanding that until he was remarried he worked long hours in the Embassy, before I got there. Sometimes he had people in there at 9:00 o'clock at night.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Compared to other station chiefs that you had worked under, was he more demanding or less?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would not say he was any more. He expected work out of his people and got it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is it fair to say that the Mexico City station had one of the biggest telephone surveillance operations in existence?\n\nMr. Shaw. Certainly in Latin America.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Any CIA station?\n\nMr. Shaw. I don't know about any CIA station. Certainly in Latin America. It ate up a lot of man hours.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In light of the fact that Mr. Scott apparently was a demanding man and that you had one of the largest surveillance operations in effect in Latin America, your testimony today is that you do not know whether the Cuban operations case officers reviewed all of the transcripts?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not think that the prefacing was necessary. The latter part of that, in which you asked me if I am aware\nthat all of the transcripts of the Cuban Ops were examined\nby the Cuban Ops section, I would have to, again, say I do\nnot know.\n\n(Discussion off the record.)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. We just went off the record for a moment\nbecause Mr. Shaw had a question about where his car was parked\nand whether there would be any problem about that, and I\nindicated that I did not think there would be a problem.\n\nMr. Shaw, do you recall who delivered the photographs\nto the station, the tape from the surveillance operation?\n\nMr. Shaw. It was my understanding that the technician\npicked them up. Bob Zambernardi would have picked them up\nfrom the agent.\n\nYou are talking of the Cuban Embassy now?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes, and consulate.\n\nMr. Shaw. It is my understanding that he would have\npicked them up from the agent who took the photographs. The\nagent who took the photographs developed them, printed them,\nand turned the prints over to Mr. Zambernardi. That is the way\nI think it worked.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How would you actually get to review the\nphotographs? Who would bring them to you?\n\nMr. Shaw. Usually I do not remember who brought them to\nme. I have the impression it may have been Lorna McKay, but\nI could be wrong. Maybe Bob brought them to me. I do not know.\nBut I would get a batch of photographs to go through.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who had reporting responsibility for passing along the information that had been obtained from the photographs and the transcripts?\n\nMr. Shaw. There was little reporting that came out of the photographs. Usually, it yielded what we called operational information rather than intelligence information, to enable us to develop a better understanding of who was in the area, of who was in the Cuban Embassy, and what they were up to.\n\nAs far as reporting intelligence that came from those, it probably was reported by the reports section of the Embassy. Next to Winn Scott's office was the CA Chief's office and, next to that, I'm getting in the new embassy now. I don't remember where the report section was in the old embassy.\n\nWe had reports officers who actually repaired most of the reports from raw reports, if you will, reported by the case officers.\n\nAgain, I would like to point out that these photographs yielded very little reportable intelligence. It was mostly operational intelligence.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Understood.\n\nWho was George Monroe?\n\nMr. Shaw. George Monroe was a former agent, Special Agent, of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who retired or resigned, I do not know how he left the Bureau, and worked in Mexico\nCity on the outside, as a non-official cover asset for Winn Scott. Ann Goodpasture, I believe, had a lot of contact with George Monroe. I very seldom saw George Monroe. I had nothing to do with him operationally.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what his responsibilities were?\n\nMr. Shaw. I believe his responsibilities had to do with dealings with the Mexican government, liaison responsibilities. I think George was used by Winn because George had good contacts in the Ministry of Interior, which would have been sort of the equivalent of the Department of Justice here and out of that Ministry came, for example, the man who became President of Mexico. He was the station asset, contact, not agent.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. You mentioned earlier, Mr. Charles Anderson, is that correct?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Mr. Anderson had an interest in Eusbio Ascue?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not believe it was. I think it was Teresa Proenza. I do not think he had any interest in Ascue.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who was the individual who had the interest in Ascue?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. I said if it had been before my arrival, I would suspect it was Tom Hasley. He was carrying the ball down there and was responsible for that sort of\nactivity. I do not know that he did, but if it happened in, say, late '62 or somewhere in there, it probably would have been Tom who would have done that.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What was Anderson's position at the Embassy?\n\nMr. Shaw. He was not at the Embassy then. He was at the Embassy back in 1965. I do not know, for a number of years. At that time, Charlie had gone back to Headquarters and he was involved in Cuban operations from Headquarters, the details of which were not made known to me. Whether they were made known to Winn Scott or Dave Phillips or others, I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When would he have made an effort, if he did, to recruit Teresa Proenza?\n\nMr. Shaw. I am not sure that he ever tried to recruit. I am merely saying that he had a lot of interest. I do not think anybody ever tried to recruit her. If they did, they were wasting their time.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why were they wasting their time?\n\nMr. Shaw. She was a pretty tough nut. I never saw -- if I can remember -- I do not remember any vulnerability of Teresa Proenza.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What was the nature of Mr. Anderson's interest in her?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know. Some Cuban operational interest, maybe trying to get some information from her through a third\nparty. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did he spend time in Mexico City that he would have had an opportunity?\n\nMr. Shaw. He visited Mexico City quite often.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Even though he was not stationed down there, he visited often?\n\nMr. Shaw. That is correct. He made trips in and out of Mexico City.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know what Teresa Proenza's position was at the Cuban Embassy or Consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. I think by that time she was out of the Embassy, was she not? I do not remember. She left.\n\nTeresa Proenza was a Mexican. She was not a Cuban. And I am under the impression that by the time I got there, Teresa had left the Embassy. I may be wrong. I think that she was involved in cultural activities.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether Mexican intelligence would have had any penetration agents at the Cuban Embassy or consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. I think they would have tried. I do not know how effective Mexican intelligence was. I did not deal with it.\n\nIt would be assumed that they made every attempt, the Cubans were gradually removing Mexicans from their employee, from the Cuban Embassy. I think it highly unlikely that the\nMexican government, given its position, was the only government in the Western Hemisphere which maintained relations with Cuba, would have been -- it would have been highly unlikely for them to have tried to pitch a Cuban national.\n\nOn the other hand, I think it would have been likely, and would have been expected of them, to have tried to find out from any Mexican working in the Cuban Embassy what was going on.\n\nWhat this comes down to, of course, is gardeners and secretaries.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why do you make that distinction between a Cuban national and a Mexican?\n\nMr. Shaw. I make that distinction because of the flap potential. If the Mexicans had attempted to pitch a Cuban and the Cuban had not accepted that pitch and had reported it to his superiors, the Mexican Foreign Office then would have had a problem with the Cuban Foreign Ministry.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Of course, the Mexican government was also taking a risk by being involved in the liaison operation or the Agency as well.\n\nMr. Shaw. One could assume that they had measured their risk, yes, certainly. There is an element of risk in every operation. Do not get me wrong. I do not know whether they had anything going or not. I would assume, just based on my experience, that they would not have tried to pitch Cubans,\nthat they would have tried to exert subtle coercion on\nMexicans working there to report in the interest of Mexican\nnational security on what is going on in that Embassy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who would have been in a position to know\nif the Mexican government successfully penetrated the Cuban\nEmbassy or consulate?\n\nMr. Shaw. The President of Mexico would have known.\nThe chief or chiefs of the Mexican service or services.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Any American?\n\nMr. Shaw. Not that I know of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether there was any coordina-\ntion between the telephone tap operations and the photo\noperations. For example, if a conversation of interest came\nup on the tap operation, would the people monitoring the call\nbe able to contact through an intermediary the photo bases\nto warn them or indicate to them that someone is coming of\ninterest?\n\nMr. Shaw. It is my understanding that such a system did\nnot exist, and I do not believe that the guys monitoring the\ntelephone tap intercept bases were made aware of photograph\ncoverage.\n\nHowever, I would assume that a man running a technical\noperation, if he heard something exciting on the line, as\nopposed to a tape several days later, would notify his case\nofficer right away and then it might be possible for the case\nofficer, assuming a quick reaction capability, to crank up\nthe people at the photo house to take pictures. This was in\nthe most perfect of all worlds. Usually things did not work\nthat way and you end up out on the street, in the middle of\nthe night two days later, contacting whoever it is taking\nphotographs.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the Mexico City\nstation ever obtained a photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. To my understanding, they did not. I never\nsaw anything down there that looked like Lee Harvey Oswald.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you ever hear an allegation that\nCharlotte Bustos, at CIA Headquarters in Washington, found a\nphotograph of Oswald, or someone she thought to be Oswald,\nin the Headquarters files shortly after the assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I have never heard such a story. Knowing\nCharlotte -- not knowing her well, but having known her over\nthe years, I would assume that had she found such a thing\nshe would have rung a big loud bell and say, hey, look what\nI found.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. With regard to the photo operation, let\nus assume for a moment that you come across a picture of\ninterest. Did you have any way of determining on what day and\napproximately what time the picture would have been taken?\n\nMr. Shaw. Very definitely.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How would you have done that?\nMr. Shaw. The photographs were squared off and were annotated. We knew the day. We knew, usually, morning or afternoon, a.m. or p.m. Sometimes you could judge by the sequence.\n\nFurthermore, sometimes the actual time of the person going in and going out was actually annotated, if the person operating was operating manually, he would no doubt, the guy with the red-checkered Hawaiian shirt went in at 10:05. He would note that in a little log.\n\nI do not know whether he would note it on the photograph or submit the log with the number keyed to the log in the photograph. Quite often we knew to the minute when a person in a photograph came in or went out or stood in front or walked by.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I see.\n\nSo, to your knowledge, there were photo-production logs that could be checked?\n\nMr. Shaw. To my knowledge, such logs did exist, yes. Whether the logs were kept after the information was noted on the photograph, on the back of the photograph or wherever it was noted, I have no idea.\n\nThe photographs, quite often came in the form of 35 mm. contact strip prints and then blow-ups of a number of those.\n\nI recall -- I had not thought about it all these years, but usually you knew when a guy, you certainly knew when he went\nin on Tuesday morning, the 16th of May, whatever that date was.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Who would make the notations on the back of the photograph or contact print as to the time?\n\nMr. Shaw. In our case, I believe it was the man taking the photographs because he took the photographs, developed the photographs, printed them and turned them over.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. If he were to put the time on, he would have to go to his log and see what the time was and then make the entry?\n\nMr. Shaw. Right. He probably made a little notation to himself like I mentioned, the bright shirt or something. Then he would recognize that person in the photograph and make that notation.\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that the name Lee Harvey Oswald came to your attention?\n\nMr. Shaw. It would have been the evening of the day of the assassination.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How did that happen?\n\nMr. Shaw. We listened. We had a radio. I think it was one of those Zenith Trans-Oceanics in one of the Embassy offices.\n\nI was out at an agent meeting when I heard about the assassination and I came back to the Embassy and went upstairs\nand we sat and stood around that radio and I believe it was in Pat Johnson's office -- her name was something else in those days. I can't remember her married name.\n\nAnd they said something about the police said it was Lee Harvey Oswald, or something. I do not remember. That was the first time that it came to my attention.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I would like you now to take a look at CIA No. 13 which is a transcript of the conversation allegedly involving Oswald, a conversation taking place on 1 October '63. Would you please read through that?\n\n(Pause)\n\nWhen was the first time that you saw that transcript, if you have ever seen it before?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know whether I have ever seen it or not, but I may well have. I was aware that he had called the Soviet Embassy, was made aware after the notoriety of the man was established, but I do not recall ever seeing this before that.\n\nNormally, I would not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Prior to the assassination, did you see it?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. If I did, I did not pay any attention. I do not believe that it was on a Cuban line.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No, it was not.\n\nMr. Shaw. Sometimes you can tell who saw these things by\nthe initials up top.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. There are no writings or notations on that one, however.\n\nWould you please read CIA 177, which is a cable from Mexico City station dated October 8th?\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes, this is typical where they try to identify somebody that was in the Embassy at the same time. Of course, that does not sound like it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. This was the famous cable that has given rise to some of the issues that the Committee was concerned with. My first question is, did you have anything to do with the writing of this cable?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I did not. I would not have had.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know how the photograph referred to in paragraph number two of that cable was in some way linked to Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would assume, my answer to your question is no. I would assume that this was an effort on the part of the person drafting the cable to help Headquarters identify Lee Oswald, the man who had made the call.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know how she made that conclusion that the photograph reflected Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. I do not think she did. I think she merely says that we got a guy who looks like he might be an\nAmerican going in, and maybe this is the fellow. I do not see from this cable any conclusion that that is Oswald. I rather suspect they never got a picture of Oswald. This is the one that appeared there, that looked like it could be an American. Therefore, an effort was made to help Headquarters by saying a man who looked like he might be an American entered the Soviet Embassy at that time.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I agree with you, Mr. Shaw. Certainly, the cable does not say that the photograph is a photograph of Oswald. At the same time, though, it gives the information in paragraph 1 on Oswald and the second paragraph makes reference to a photograph taken of someone who appears to be North American.\n\nCertainly they would not have sent to Headquarters simply a cable indicating the existence of a photograph, so by putting the photograph in paragraph 2 immediately below the information on Oswald, although the cable does not say that the photograph is one of Oswald, it does in some way suggest that they are related.\n\nMr. Shaw. It suggests to me that they know an American who claimed to be Lee Oswald called at a certain time, and then they went to the photographs to see if they could find anybody who looked like he might be an American, and the photo they found was of a man apparently 35, athletic build, about 6 feet tall, receding hair line and so forth; and they\nsubmitted this on the off-chance that this might have been the man who made the call.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I understand your answer. I am hopeful that you understand that I am not suggesting that the cable definitely says the photograph is one of Oswald.\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not see that it does at all.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you please take a look, now, at CIA 183?\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. All right, I have read it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. This is a cable, is it not, from CIA Headquarters back to the Mexico City station responding to the earlier cable from the station reporting Oswald's contact?\n\nMr. Shaw. That is what it looks like to me.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The fifth paragraph of that cable requests that the station keep Headquarters advised of any further contacts or positive identification of Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the station ever sent any additional information to Headquarters concerning Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not, and I do not recall ever seeing this cable, either.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Today is possibly the first time that you have seen that cable?\n\nMr. Shaw. It could well be, yes. You may have one with\nmy initials on it, but I doubt it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Looking at CIA 183, there is an arrow pointed to the word \"Henry\", \"Lee Henry Oswald.\" Adjacent to the arrow it says \"sic,\" s-i-c.\n\nWhat do you think Mr. Scott was intending to indicate when he wrote \"sic\" next to the \"Henry\" in \"Lee Henry Oswald\"?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would rather suspect that he wrote this on here subsequent to the assassination when the word came out it was \"Harvey Oswald\" rather than \"Henry Oswald\" unless there is something in here that says \"Harvey.\" Is there any?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. No, there is none.\n\nMr. Shaw. I would imagine that is something he wrote on later so that they would get the file in the right name. That would be my guess.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Would you now take a look at CIA No. 14. You may also want to take a look at CIA No. 15 at the same time.\n\n(Pause)\n\nWould you identify the document that you just reviewed?\n\nMr. Shaw. What it looks like is a normal LIENVOY transcription. I see my name up here, but I don't see anything that indicates that I ever saw it. It looks like Scott and Goodpasture made checks on it. There is my name, but there is no indication, no initial on my part. Probably I did not see it.\nMr. Goldsmith. What is the date of that transcript?\n\nMr. Shaw. 28 September 1963 is what is listed on here.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you recall whether you ever saw that transcript before?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not recall. I must have seen it afterwards, because I know Sylvia Duran was a person who had dealt with Oswald.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that this transcript was linked to Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Let us backstep for a moment. The transcript that appears at CIA No. 13 contains a notation in brackets by the transcriber that this is the same person who called a day or so ago.\n\nMr. Shaw. To the Soviet Embassy.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Yes.\n\nOswald also said I was there last Saturday. The transcript you just looked at, September 28th, was for a Saturday.\n\nDo you recall whether anyone ever came to you and asked you whether you were aware of a contact by Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not recall that anybody ever came to me, and I do not think that they did. This sounds familiar. I would have heard about this after the assassination, because I remember Sylvia Duran was the person being a Mexican citizen inside the Cuban Embassy who I dealt with.\nMr. Goldsmith. In other words, the point I was making on the October 1st transcript, it refers back to something that happened a day or two earlier, possibly Saturday, and I wondered if Herb Minnell, when they were discussing this, came to you to discuss this matter?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not believe they did. Barbara probably would have processed this, but I do not recall that anybody ever came to me about it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Fine. Would you please now take a look at CIA Nos. 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20?\n\n(Pause)\n\nMr. Shaw. Here you have one that I saw. Those are my initials -- No. 19. I did not see this one.\n\nLet me see what we have got here.\n\n(Pause)\n\nI have read it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, you have read through CIA document No. 22.\n\nMr. Shaw. Yes, I have not read them carefully, but I have looked them over.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Taking a look at CIA No. 16, could you identify that document?\n\nMr. Shaw. This is a LIENVOY transcript.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is it a summary or a verbatim transcript?\n\nMr. Shaw. It is a summary.\nMr. Goldsmith. What is the date of that transcript?\n\nMr. Shaw. According to the thing in the margin, 27 September '63, 1963. This is really the same darned thing here.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. The same as the transcript that appears on CIA No. 17?\n\nMr. Shaw. It appears to be.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Approximately what time was this phone call received?\n\nMr. Shaw. It looks like something put on by pen, \"Five minutes after 4:00 in the afternoon.\" MF means a woman -- is that MF?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do not worry about that.\n\nWhen was the first time you saw this transcript?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not remember.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you see it before the assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Your name appears in the right-hand corner.\n\nMr. Shaw. My name appears there. However, it is not crossed out. If you turn over a couple of pages, you will see my initials on another thing which deals with the same period.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I will do that in a minute.\n\nDo you know whether this transcript was linked to Oswald prior to the assassination?\nMr. Shaw. I do not know whether it was or not. I gather it was not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why is that?\n\nMr. Shaw. It does not say. There is no mark on it, Oswald on here anywhere.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What are these numbers on the bottom right-hand --\n\nMr. Shaw. That is the file number.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What file would that be?\n\nMr. Shaw. That says subject file. 50-8-10-6. I do not know off-hand what that is. I think the 50 stands for Mexico. 8-10-6 would be a subject file.\n\nProbably, possibly someplace where they put information on people where they are trying to travel to the Soviet Union. I do not know; that is a guess.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Let's take a look at CIA No. 19.\n\nMr. Shaw. Okay. CIA No. 19, 27 September, that looks like my initial. It is very similar.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In the upper right-hand corner?\n\nMr. Shaw. I cannot imagine anyone else putting it there.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. This is the conversation that took place later in the day, is that correct?\n\nMr. Shaw. 27 September 63, right.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is it fair to say that this conversation took place sometime around 4:26 in the afternoon, according to\nthe documents?\n\nMr. Shaw. There is an indication there.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When did this document first come to your attention?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea, because there is no date up there. I do not know when it was circulated or anything.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know when it was first linked to Oswald?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did Herbert or Barb Minnell ever come to you to discuss this transcript or conversation with you in reference to the transcript dated October 1st?\n\nMr. Shaw. Not that I remember.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. At the bottom of CIA No. 19, it says copy Oswald P-file. Essentially, do you know when that notation was put on?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not know.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Turning back to CIA-177, there is a notation on the left-hand side of the page. It says, D:200-5-41. Do you know what that would refer to?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea what the D stands for. The 200-5-41 sounds like a file number.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know for what?\n\nMr. Shaw. No, I do not, but I would assume, again, that maybe that would be -- if it is in the 50 series, it would be\na Mexico City file. But it may be a Headquarters -- is this\na Mexico City document, or a Headquarters document?\n\nMr. Goldsmith. This is a Headquarters document.\n\nMr. Shaw. That is a Headquarters file number. I have no\nidea what the D stands for. It does not look right.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. I have asked this question before, but\nfor the record and purposes of clarification, I would like to\nask you again, to your knowledge, after the Mexico City sta-\ntion received the cable from Headquarters dated October 10th\nor 11th, did the Mexico City Station ever send any additional\ninformation concerning Oswald to Headquarters?\n\nMr. Shaw. To my knowledge, they did not, but I would\nhave no way of knowing.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you ever speak to Herb Minnell about\nthis?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Barbara Minnell?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Dave Phillips?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. What, if anything, do you know about the\narrest of Sylvia Duran shortly after the assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. I remember that Sylvia Duran was arrested.\n\nI do not know why. I could have suggested that myself, but I\ndo not remember.\nI do remember sending a message to Winn Scott suggesting that, right after the assassination, that the Mexicans put in a ring of guards around the Cuban Embassy and question everybody going in and out. I remember that idea coming out of my head.\n\nI know that Sylvia Duran was arrested. She was fair game because she was a Mexican national and the Cubans -- she did not have any Cuban diplomatic immunity.\n\nI would have thought it would have been a good idea to question her very closely. As to whether I said that she should be arrested or I had anything to do with that, I do not know. I was perfectly capable of making such a suggestion.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Headquarters was upset about that arrest?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no idea.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Headquarters did not want any Americans to confront her or to interview her?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you have any reason to believe that Oswald may have been an agent of the KGB?\n\nMr. Shaw. I have no reason to believe it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. How about an agent, asset or source of the CIA?\n\nMr. Shaw. I would think that that would be completely out of the question.\nMr. Goldsmith. For purposes of the record, could you explain why you think that would be out of the question?\n\nMr. Shaw. Because I think it would have come to light immediately had he had any CIA connections.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. In what manner?\n\nMr. Shaw. Somebody would have revealed this fact.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Had he been an agent of the CIA, asset or employee, is it possible that someone would have been able to cover that fact up?\n\nMr. Shaw. I do not think anyone could have covered up.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why not?\n\nMr. Shaw. Had he been an agent, then it would have been on the record somewhere.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Is it possible that the record could have been erased or purged in some way?\n\nMr. Shaw. I seriously doubt it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Could you give a reason?\n\nMr. Shaw. Just my belief in the integrity of the organization. It stands on that, and the people in it.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does the Agency, to your knowledge, have any safeguards to prevent records from being erased or purged?\n\nMr. Shaw. Nowadays, of course, we have laws which say you can't destroy material. I would say that the safeguards again come back to the basic integrity of the people in the organization. When you lose a President, you do not mess\naround, and I think everybody would have turned over every possible stone to find out anything they could that would be useful in determining the responsibility for that assassination.\n\nI know I would have. I was a Kennedy man, and I imagine there were a lot of us in the outfit who identified very closely with the President.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did you ever know anybody by the name of Maurice Bishop?\n\nMr. Shaw. No.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether David Phillips, or anyone else, ever used the name Maurice Bishop as an operational alias of some kind?\n\nMr. Shaw. I am not aware that they did, but I would have to answer your question no. Dave Phillips does not seem like a Maurice type, somehow.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Did Headquarters ever criticize the Mexico City station in any way for its handling of the Oswald matter prior to the assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. Not that I am aware of.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. For that matter, after the assassination?\n\nMr. Shaw. Not that I am aware of. I must add that criticism would have been conveyed to the Chief of Station rather than to the case officers.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. When Oswald returned to the United States\nfrom the Soviet Union, would it have been standard operating procedure for the Agency to have interviewed him or debriefed him in some way?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. I think that it would have been more likely for the FBI to interview him.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Why is that?\n\nMr. Shaw. Because he was an American citizen in the United States. That was the FBI's territory.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Even though Oswald worked for several years -- not for several years, but for some time -- in a radio factory while he was in Russia?\n\nMr. Shaw. I was not aware that he worked in a radio factory, but the fact that he had been in the Soviet Union, the fact that he had been in the United States Marine Corps, would indicate to me that if he had been interviewed, he would have been interviewed by the FBI.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Does not the Agency have a Domestic Contacts Division, or service, which customarily interviews people who have been abroad in Communist countries?\n\nMr. Shaw. The Agency has the Domestic Contacts Division. It used to be called O/Q Contacts. I never worked with those people.\n\nIt is my understanding that what they do is routinely debrief, if the person is willing, businessmen -- in the old days, tourists -- who had visited the Soviet Union, or to\ndebrief a man who might have other involvement in the Soviets would not, I believe, have fallen within the purview of the O/O Contacts Branch.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Do you have any knowledge of the operational activity of the CI/SIG Branch of the CIA?\n\nMr. Shaw. No. I do not know what SIG means. I have never heard of CI/SIG.\n\nCI is Counterintelligence staff. I don't know what SIG is.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I would like to thank you for your testimony today. I especially would like to thank you for spending all of this time with us. I know that you have been here since approximately 3:00 o'clock or so and it is now about 7:30. You have been very patient.\n\nCustomarily, whenever a witness testifies before the Committee, the witness is given an opportunity to make a statement for the record. This is not a hearing, but I would like to give you the same opportunity, if you would like to take advantage of it.\n\nMr. Shaw. Well, I might take advantage of it. I had not thought about it until you mentioned it, but harkening back to what I said a little while ago, I do believe that our organization was made up of, like Bill Colby has on the cover of his book over there on the next table, of honorable men, and I do not think that anyone in the organization would have\nallowed any cover-up or any destruction of evidence which might\nshed some light on the assassination of President Kennedy.\n\nI might add a little vignette. We had what it called a\nLibra Pecima which is a book that the people signed when\nthey come to a funeral or something. You may have run into\nsomething like this in the states, when you go in and sign\nin at the funeral parlor that you were there or something.\nYou express your regrets -- pecima, in Spanish, means regrets,\nor sorrow.\n\nWe had a book down in the lobby of the Embassy building\nand when I came out one day shortly after the assassination\nsomebody in the crowd yelled Spanish for Bob, and I went over\nand it was the Governor of the State of Sonora, which is\na big state up in northwestern Mexico. I had known him some\nyears earlier. He was the son of the General who was the\noutstanding military leader of the Mexican Revolution from\nabout 1913 to about 1920.\n\nHis father had been President of Mexico. His father was\nassassinated, having been elected to a second term. He was\nalready elected; he had not taken office.\n\nI was profoundly touched by the presence of this son of\nan assassinated President in the lobby of our Embassy to, in\nturn, express his sorrow to us for the assassination of our\nPresident.\n\nThat does not prove anything one way or another, but it\nmade a tremendous effect on me.\n\nAs I mentioned very early in our session today, I am not aware that there was any exultation, satisfaction, or happiness inside the Cuban Embassy over the assassination of the President. And I think, and my personal belief is, that everything points to Lee Harvey Oswald having done it, and done it alone.\n\nThere is nothing I have ever seen or heard which would lead me to accept, for one moment, any complicity on the part of my Agency or any other agency of the United States government.\n\nMr. Goldsmith. Thank you, Mr. Shaw.\n\nI would like to add that as soon as the transcript of this deposition is available, we will be in touch with you so that you can have an opportunity to review it for accuracy and again, I would like to thank you for your time and help today.\n\nMr. Shaw. I thank you, gentlemen.\n\n(Thereupon, at 7:30 p.m. the Executive Session recessed.)\nCERTIFICATE OF REPORTER\n\nI, Rosemary C. Tascione, the officer before whom the foregoing deposition was taken, do hereby certify that the witness whose testimony appears in the foregoing deposition was duly sworn by the Notary; that the testimony of said witness was taken by myself, stenomask reporter, and thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction; that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which this deposition was taken, and further, that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties thereto, nor financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.\n\nRosemary C. Tascione\nREPORTER", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2025-03-20", "created": "2025-03-20", "metadata": {"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10329.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.1.60", "pdf-total-pages": 78, "total-input-tokens": 89154, "total-output-tokens": 25215, "total-fallback-pages": 0}, "attributes": {"pdf_page_numbers": [[0, 0, 1], [0, 613, 2], [613, 1598, 3], [1598, 2819, 4], [2819, 3846, 5], [3846, 4982, 6], [4982, 6171, 7], [6171, 7487, 8], [7487, 8607, 9], [8607, 9786, 10], [9786, 10930, 11], [10930, 12236, 12], [12236, 13496, 13], [13496, 14781, 14], [14781, 15912, 15], [15912, 17252, 16], [17252, 18540, 17], [18540, 19665, 18], [19665, 20865, 19], [20865, 21968, 20], [21968, 23259, 21], [23259, 24640, 22], [24640, 25791, 23], [25791, 26910, 24], [26910, 28240, 25], [28240, 29451, 26], [29451, 30673, 27], [30673, 32037, 28], [32037, 33356, 29], [33356, 34707, 30], [34707, 35866, 31], [35866, 36767, 32], [36767, 38094, 33], [38094, 39421, 34], [39421, 40732, 35], [40732, 42092, 36], [42092, 43393, 37], [43393, 44574, 38], [44574, 45760, 39], [45760, 47008, 40], [47008, 48197, 41], [48197, 49416, 42], [49416, 50572, 43], [50572, 51846, 44], [51846, 52849, 45], [52849, 53992, 46], [53992, 55198, 47], [55198, 56359, 48], [56359, 57610, 49], [57610, 58858, 50], [58858, 60160, 51], [60160, 61390, 52], [61390, 62628, 53], [62628, 63776, 54], [63776, 65065, 55], [65065, 66335, 56], [66335, 67652, 57], [67652, 68887, 58], [68887, 70001, 59], [70001, 71161, 60], [71161, 72315, 61], [72315, 73691, 62], [73691, 74833, 63], [74833, 76027, 64], [76027, 77205, 65], [77205, 78224, 66], [78224, 79261, 67], [79261, 80373, 68], [80373, 81446, 69], [81446, 82560, 70], [82560, 83705, 71], [83705, 84924, 72], [84924, 86067, 73], [86067, 87309, 74], [87309, 88580, 75], [88580, 89909, 76], [89909, 90806, 77], [90806, 91505, 78]]}}