Sensors [http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/3/5251.The authors wish to update the Acknowledgments in their paper published in Sensors , doi:10.


The second author’s last name is misspelled. The correct name is: Alexis C. Frazier-Wood. The correct citation is given below.Cheung CHM, Frazier-Wood AC, Asherson P, Rijsdijk F, Kuntsi J (2014) Shared Cognitive Impairments and Aetiology in ADHD Symptoms and Reading Difficulties. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98590. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098590


PLoS ONE 9(3): e91694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091694The second author’s name is incorrect. The correct name is Robin Fortt. The correct citation is: Witney TH, Fortt R, Aboagye EO (2014) Preclinical Assessment of Carboplatin Treatment Efficacy in Lung Cancer by


The fourth author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Alex Lu. The correct citation is: Debruin EJ, Hughes MR, Sina C, Lu A, Cait J, et al. (2014) Podocalyxin Regulates Murine Lung Vascular Permeability by Altering Endothelial Cell Adhesion. PLoS ONE 9(10): e108881. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108881


Dr. Yusuke Naito is the third author and also a corresponding author for this article. His affiliation is:2Sanofi-aventis K.K., Tokyo, Japan. His contributions are as follows: analyzed the data and wrote the paper.The correct citation and contact information of the corresponding authors are:Kadowaki T, Ohtani T, Naito Y, Odawara M (2012) Potential Formula for the Calculation of Starting and Incremental Insulin Glargine Doses: ALOHA Subanalysis. PLoS ONE 7(8): e41358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041358Corresponding Authorskadowaki-3im@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp)Takashi Kadowaki (yusuke.naito@sanofi.com)Yusuke Naito (


There are errors in the Author Contributions. The correct contributions are: Conceived and designed the experiments: AC AJW A. Mondino AAM PRQ. Performed the experiments: AC GC ER VB MV A. Monno. Analyzed the data: AC GF ER AJW A. Mondino AAM PRQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AJW A. Mondino AAM PRQ. Wrote the paper: AC GF AEA A. Mondino AJW AAM PRQ.The following information is missing from the Funding section: AIRC—Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG 11970/2011 to A.M.).The publisher apologizes for these errors.


The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson. The correct citation is: Latif N, Barbosa AV, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Castelhano MS, Munhall KG (2014) Movement Coordination during Conversation. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105036. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105036


Opisthorchis felineus Acquired in Italy , author Wouter Rozemeijer’s name was spelled incorrectly. The article has been corrected online (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/1/13-0476_article).In the article Foodborne Trematodiasis and


The fifth author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Justin I. Odegaard. The correct citation is: Richardson ML, Fu C-L, Pennington LF, Honeycutt JD, Odegaard JI, et al. (2014) A New Mouse Model for Female Genital Schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(5): e2825. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002825


Recent tastases . Preclintastases -5. As a tastases  to a protastases . Paralletastases . In humatastases . Dranofflearance . Decreaslearance . Since Rlearance  biopsies


Arabidopsis thaliana Using TAL-Effector-Nucleases. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0121056. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121056The fourth author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Pablo A. Manavella. The correct citation is: Forner J, Pfeiffer A, Langenecker T, Manavella PA, Lohmann JU (2015) Germline-Transmitted Genome Editing in


The second author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Ş. Utku Yavuz. The correct citation is: Negro F, Yavuz ŞU, Farina D (2014) Limitations of the Spike-Triggered Averaging for Estimating Motor Unit Twitch Force: A Theoretical Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(3): e92390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092390


P. aureofaciens LMG 2145 should be P. aureofaciens 1245. P. amygdali LMG1384 should be P. amygdali 13184. P. resinovorans LMG 2774 should be P. resinovorans LMG 2274. P. mandelii LMG 2210 should be P. mandelii LMG 21607. P. luteola LMG 21607 should be P. luteola LMG 7041. Please see the corrected Figs There are errors in the names of type strains appearing in Figs S1 FiggyrB, rpoD and rpoB genes from 451 sequenced genomes and 107 type strains (bold), ML method and Tamura-Nei model. C. japonicus Ueda 107 was used as outgroup. Only bootstrap values above 75% over 1000 replicates are shown. Bold and T indicates type strain.MLSA based on partial sequences of 16S rDNA, (PDF)Click here for additional data file.


Aging (Albany NY) 2015; 7(2): 97-109.PMCID: PMC4359692 PMID: 25701668http://www.impactaging.com/papers/v7/n2/pdf/100718.pdf.In this Article, the error was found in Figure 5: The correct Figure is provided here.


Cryptococcus gattii Populations, Vancouver Island, Canada, 2002–2004 . The article has been corrected online (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/21/11/14-1161_article).Cryptococcus was misspelled in the title of Climatic Influences on


There are errors in the Author Contributions. The correct contributions are: Conceived and designed the experiments: HO VT SS RL MNP LK JA. Performed the experiments: HO VT MW. Analyzed the data: HO VT SS RL MNP LK JA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RL MNP LK JA. Wrote the paper: HO VT.


Following the publication of the original article , it was ‘20. Freire SM, Sundvall E, Karlsson D, Lambrix P. Performance of XML Databases for Epidemiological Queries in Archetype-Based EHRs. 2012:51–57.’However, it should instead read as:http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/070/009/ecp1270009.pdf’‘20. Freire SM, Sundvall E, Karlsson D, Lambrix P. Performance of XML Databases for Epidemiological Queries in Archetype-Based EHRs. Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics 2012:51–57.


The matrix for FTIR spectra is available under the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1300167. The report of S/G ratio in thirteen Cactaceae species studie by HPLC is available under the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1300168. Supporting Information of the S/G ratio in thirteen Cactaceae species studied by HPLC is available under the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1300165. Supporting Information of the percentage of syringyl-size plant graphic is available under the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1300166.The Data Availability statement for this paper is incorrect. The correct statement is: All relevant data are available from Figshare. The complete dataset of chemical composition in Cactaceae wood is available under the DOI:


Nucl. Acids Res. 43 (12): e80. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv242Johan den Dunnen's middle initial was omitted. The author's full name should be Johan T. den Dunnen.The publisher apologises to the authors for this error.


Aurelia Species: Understanding Jellyfish Ecology Using Genetics and Morphometrics. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0156588. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156588The second author's name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Keith M. Bayha. The correct citation is: Chiaverano LM, Bayha KM, Graham WM (2016) Local versus Generalized Phenotypes in Two Sympatric


AbstractNesomyrmex is reviewed and (1) subdivided into four major groups based on salient morphological features corroborated by numeric morphology: angulatus-, hafahafa-, madecassus- and sikorai-groups, and (2) the hafahafa species-group endemic to Madagascar is revised. Diversity within hafahafa species-group was assessed via hypothesis-free nest-centroid-clustering combined with gap statistic to assess the number of clusters and to determine the most probable boundaries between them. This combination of methods provides a highly automatized, objective species delineation protocol based on continuous morphometric data. Delimitations of clusters recognized by these exploratory analyses were tested via confirmatory Linear Discriminant Analysis. These results suggest the existence of four morphologically distinct species, Nesomyrmexcapricornissp. n., Nesomyrmexhafahafasp. n., Nesomyrmexmedusussp. n. and Nesomyrmexspinosussp. n.; all are described and an identification key for their worker castes using morphometric data is provided. Two members of the newly outlined hafahafa species-group, Nesomyrmexhafahafasp. n., Nesomyrmexmedusussp. n., are distributed along the southeastern coast Madagascar and occupy rather large ranges, but two other species, Nesomyrmexcapricornissp. n. and Nesomyrmexspinosussp. n., are only known to occur in small and isolated forest, highlighting the importance of small forest patches for conserving arthropod diversity.Madagascar and its surrounding islands are among the world’s greatest biodiversity hotspots, harboring predominantly endemic and threatened communities meriting special attention from biodiversity scientists. Building on the considerable efforts in recent years to inventory the Malagasy ant fauna, the myrmicine genus  The Malagasy zoogeographical region, i.e. Madagascar and surrounding islands , is consNesomyrmex have never been the subject of focused research. To date, only four valid Nesomyrmex species have been recorded to occur in Madagascar  makes the appearance of this group extremely unique; no similar species group has been found either in the Malagasy region or on the African continent. Multivariate evaluation of morphological data has revealed that the unique-looking Nesomyrmexhafahafa species-group comprises four well-outlined clusters, or species, that are endemic to Madagascar. The four new species outlined, Nesomyrmexcapricornis sp. n., Nesomyrmexhafahafa sp. n., Nesomyrmexmedusus sp. n., and Nesomyrmexspinosus sp. n., are described here based on worker caste, and both a key that includes both a numeric identification tool that helps readers to resolve the most problematic cases and a traditional character based key. Distribution maps are also provided. Our research PageBreakhas also revealed that two of the four species, Nesomyrmexcapricornis sp. n. and Nesomyrmexspinosus sp. n., occur in small, highly isolated forests, leaving them at a high risk of extinction from continuing environmental destruction or climatic changes.In the present paper, the Malagasy California Academy of Sciences (CAS), San Francisco, USA. The full list of non-type material morphometrically examined in this revision is listed in Table CASENT0460666). Designation of type material with detailed label information is given in relevant sections type material investigated for each taxon. All images and specimens used in this study are available online on AntWeb (http://www.antweb.org). Images are linked to their specimens via their unique specimen code affixed to each pin (CASENT0002660). Online specimen identifiers follow this format: http://www.antweb.org/specimen/CASENT0002660.In the present study, 21 continuous morphometric traits were recorded in 177 worker individuals belonging to 100 nest samples collected in the Malagasy region , or a Leica DFC 425 camera in combination with the Leica Application Suite software (version 3.8). Distribution maps were generated by using QGIS 2.4.0 software .The measurements were taken with a Leica MZ 12.5 stereomicroscope equipped with an ocular micrometer at a magnification of 100×. Measurements and indices are presented as arithmetic means with minimum and maximum values in parentheses. Body size dimensions are expressed in µm. Due to the abundance of worker individuals in contrast to the limited number of queen and male specimens available the present revision is based on worker caste only. Worker-based revision is further facilitated by the fact that name-bearing type specimens of the vast majority of existing ant taxa were designated from worker caste. All measurements were made by the first author. For the definition of morphometric characters, earlier protocols  were con Maximum cephalic length in median lineCL. The head must be carefully tilted to the position providing the true maximum. Excavations of hind vertex and/or clypeus reduce CL  Mesosoma length from caudalmost point of propodeal lobe to transition point between anterior pronotal slope and anterior pronotal shieldML . In gynes: length from caudalmost point of propodeal lobe to the most distant point of steep anterior pronotal face  phenotypes were compiled in mx (http://purl.org/NET/mx-database). Taxonomic history and descriptions of taxonomic treatments were rendered from this software. Hymenoptera-specific terminology of morphological statements used in descriptions, identification key, and diagnoses are mapped to classes in phenotype-relevant ontologies (Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO)   via a URgy (HAO) ; see SelIn verbal descriptions of taxa based on external morphological traits, recent taxonomic papers  were conHypothesis formation by exploratory analyses. Our hypothesis of the number of clusters and classification of samples was formulated by an exploratory data analysis technique, NC-clustering ( (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean)UPGMA distance method. This method is able to tackle large datasets with high dimensionality  is computed by multiscale bootstrap resampling, and the raw Bootstrap Probabilities (BP) that is calculated before statistical adjustments by normal bootstrap resampling.ustering  using coionality , providi were given to samples that were incongruently classified by the two methods. The confirmative LDA was run as an iterative process to achieve the lowest number of characters necessary to achieve the desired level (>97%) of classification success angulatus ilgii = latinodis = angulatus concolor = hafahafa groupcapricornis Csősz & Fisher,sp. n.hafahafa Csősz & Fisher,sp. n.medusus Csősz & Fisher,sp. n.spinosus Csősz & Fisher,sp. n.PageBreakmadecassus groupgibber madecassus sikorai groupretusispinosus sikorai Absolute cephalic size (CS): 591 µm . Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule (CL/CWb): 1.218 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.40 . Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.676 . Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.260 . Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.431 . Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.496 . Petiolar node height vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.250 . Nesomyrmexangulatus  and ca. four undescribed species belong to this group in the Malagasy zoogeographical region.Pronotal spines present or absent. Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node absent. Propodeal spines short to long and acute. Vertex ground sculpture areolate. Main sculpture on vertex not defined. Metanotal depression present or absent. Median clypeal notch present or absent. Median clypeal notch shape/depth: 0–23 µm. Antennomere count: 12. PageBreakPageBreakCS): 1059 µm . Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule (CL/CWb): 1.074 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.378 . Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.890 . Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.232 . Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.267 . Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.523 . Petiolar node height vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.142 . Four species, Nesomyrmexcapricornis sp. n., Nesomyrmexhafahafa sp. n., Nesomyrmexmedusus sp. n. and Nesomyrmexspinosus sp. n. are known to constitute this species group in Madagascar.Pronotal spines present. Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node present. Propodeal spines long and acute. Vertex ground sculpture areolate. Vertex main sculpture rugulose. metanotal depression absent. Median clypeal notch present. Median clypeal notch shape/depth: 15–31 µm. Antennomere count: 12. Absolute cephalic size (CS): 571 µm . Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule (CL/CWb): 1.231 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.479 . Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.718 . Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.249 . Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.217 . Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.331 . Petiolar node height vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.122 . Nesomyrmexmadecassus  and ca. seven other taxa from the Malagasy zoogeographical region will be revised in the forthcoming revisionary work.Pronotal spines absent. Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node absent. Propodeal spines short, lamelliform to absent. Vertex ground sculpture smooth. Vertex main sculpture not defined. Metanotal depression present. Median clypeal notch present or absent. Median clypeal notch shape/depth 0–15 µm. Antennomere count: 12. Absolute cephalic size (CS): 750 µm . Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule (CL/CWb): 1.218 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.461 . Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): PageBreak0.816 . Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.232 . Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.243 . Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.359 . Petiolar node height vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.175 . Nesomyrmexsikorai , Nesomyrmexretusispinosus  plus ca. ten more Malagasy species will be revised in a forthcoming revisionary work.Pronotal spines present or absent. Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node absent. Propodeal spines short to long and acute. Vertex ground sculpture not defined. Vertex main sculpture areolate. Metanotal depression present. Median clypeal notch present or absent. Median clypeal notch shape/depth 0–15 µm. Antennomere count: 12. Absolute cephalic size +(0.0121×SPST)-(0.0023×PSTI)+(0.0281×NSTI) +1.6LD1= -(0.0324×PEL)+(0.0258×SPST)-(0.0328×PSTI)+(0.0049×NSTI)-2.9LD2= + obtained here can either be compared to the values given in Table Though all species defined in this revisionary work proved to be highly separable via descriptive morphology, or by using simple indices, the application of classification functions LD1 and LD2 provides a foolproof, numeric morphology-based identification tool when decisions based on conventional diagnostic traits fail.PageBreakNesomyrmexhafahafa species-group are described, and a key to these species is provided. Diagnoses are given in the key, the basic statistics of body size ratios are given in Table hafahafa group is detailed in the discussion. The diagnoses and a key to the four Malagasy Nesomyrmex species groups  defined here are followed by the descriptions of species belonging to the hafahafa group.In this section, four new species of the PageBreakNesomyrmexhafahafa group differ in body ratios. The following dichotomous identification key for the worker caste was generated based on ratios of morphological features that allow quick identification. Minimum and maximum values for each character is given in parentheses. The reliability of all characters has been tested and calculated classification success was always higher than 95% for each node. Where classification error was detected (i.e. the range of a given trait overlaps between two species) a percentile range 5–95% was also provided in brackets.The species of the Taxon classificationAnimaliaHymenopteraFormicidaeCsősz & Fishersp. n.http://zoobank.org/EC84BA51-2D96-4084-AB2B-8B19AF1DEEDCHolotype worker.CASENT0452741, collection code: BLF05245; MADGAGASCAR: Prov. Toliara, Forêt Mahavelo, Isantoria Riv., 5.2 km 44°NE Ifotaka, 24°46'S, 46°09'E , 110 m, 28.iii.2002 Fisher et al. (CAS);Paratypes. Ten workers, a single gyne and two males with the same label data with the holotype under CASENT codes: CASENT0452715, “5245”, ; CASENT0452716, “5245”, ; CASENT0452717, “5245”, ; CASENT0452720, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452721, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452722, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452725, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452726, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452726, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452727, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452728, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452729, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452730, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452731, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452732, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452733, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452734, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452735, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452736, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452737, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452738, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452739, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452742, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452743, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452744, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452745, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452746, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452747, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452748, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452750, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452751, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452752, BLF05245, ; CASENT0452753, BLF05245, ;The list of 21 non-type individuals belonging to 14 nest samples of other material investigated is given in Table In key.CL/CWb): 1.079 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.390 . Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view orientation: converging posteriorly. Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view shape: broadly convex. Vertex contour line in frontal view shape: straight. Vertex sculpture: main sculpture rugose, ground sculpture areolate. Gena contour line in frontal view shape: convex. Genae contour from anterior view orientation: converging. Gena sculpture: rugo-reticulate with areolate ground sculpture. Concentric carinae laterally surrounding antennal foramen count: absent; present. Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.241 . Frontal carina distance vs. absolute cephalic size (FRS/CS): 0.315 . Longitudinal carinae on median region of frons count: present. Longitudinal carinae on medial region of frons shape: forked. Smooth median region on frons count: absent. Antennomere count: 12. Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.927 . Facial area of the scape absolute setal angle: setae absent, pubescence only. Median clypeal notch count: present. Median clypeal notch depth vs. absolute cephalic size (Cdep/CS): 0.023 . Ground sculpture of submedian area of clypeus: smooth. Median carina of clypeus count: present. Lateral carinae of clypeus count: present. Median anatomical line of propodeal spine angle value to Weber length in lateral view: 65–70°. Spine length vs. absolute cephalic size (SPST/CS): 0.397 . Minimum spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPBA/CS): 0.260 . Apical spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPTI/CS): 0.455 . Propodeal spine shape: straight; slightly bent. Apical distance of pronotal spines vs. absolute cephalic size (PSTI/CS): 0.658 . Metanotal depression count: absent. Dorsal region of mesosoma sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Lateral region of pronotum sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Mesopleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Metapleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.265 . Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node angle of deviation from each other: 60°. Apical distance of anterodorsal spines on petiolar node vs. absolute cephalic size (NSTI/CS): 0.265 . Frontal profile of petiolar node contour line in lateral view shape: straight; concave. Dorso-caudal petiolar profile contour line in lateral view shape: strongly convex. Dorsal region of petiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent. Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.558 . Dorsal region of postpetiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose.Body color: yellow. Body color pattern: Body concolorous, only clava darker. Absolute cephalic size: 1024  µm (n=27). Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule  in the southern part of Madagascar Fig. .Taxon classificationAnimaliaHymenopteraFormicidaeCsősz & Fishersp. n.http://zoobank.org/C2249F7A-0FFE-4C76-A2E8-905A4B1EA754This Malagasy word “hafahafa” means weird, and refers to the unusual morphology of this species.Holotype worker.CASENT0460666, collection code: BLF06010; MADG’R: Prov. Toliara, Forêt de Tsinjoriaky, 6.2 km 84° E Tsifota, 22°48'S, 43°25'E , 70 m, 6–10.iii.2002 Fisher et al. (CAS)Paratypes. Ten workers, a single gyne and two males with the same label data as the holotype under CASENT codes: CASENT0746771, BLF06010, ; CASENT0460667, BLF06010, ; CASENT0460668, BLF06010, ; CASENT0460669, BLF06010, ; CASENT0451364, “6019”, ; CASENT0451364, “6019”, ;The list of 44 non-type individuals belonging to 25 nest samples of other material investigated is given in Table In key.CL/CWb): 1.224 [1.193-1.254]. Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.388 . Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view orientation: converging posteriorly. Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view shape: broadly convex. Vertex contour line in frontal view shape: straight; slightly concave. Vertex sculpture: main sculpture PageBreakrugose, ground sculpture areolate. Gena contour line in frontal view shape: feebly convex. Genae contour from anterior view orientation: converging. Gena sculpture: rugo-reticulate with areolate ground sculpture. Concentric carinae laterally surrounding antennal foramen count: present. Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.230 . Frontal carina distance vs. absolute cephalic size (FRS/CS): 0.316 . Longitudinal carinae on median region of frons count: present. Longitudinal carinae on medial region of frons shape: forked. Smooth median region on frons count: absent. Antennomere count: 12. Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.895 . Facial area of the scape absolute setal angle: setae absent, pubescence only. Median clypeal notch count: present. Median clypeal notch depth vs. absolute cephalic size (Cdep/CS): 0.022 . Ground sculpture of submedian area of clypeus: smooth. Median carina of clypeus count: present. Lateral carinae of clypeus count: present. Median anatomical line of propodeal spine anPageBreakgle value to Weber length in lateral view: 55–60°. Spine length vs. absolute cephalic size (SPST/CS): 0.398 . Minimum spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPBA/CS): 0.287 . Apical spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPTI/CS): 0.543 . Propodeal spine shape: strongly bent. Apical distance of pronotal spines vs. absolute cephalic size (PSTI/CS): 0.724 . Metanotal depression count: absent. Dorsal region of mesosoma sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Lateral region of pronotum sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Mesopleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture superimposed by dispersed rugulae; areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Metapleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.307 . Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node angle of deviation from each other: 80°. Apical distance of anterodorsal spines on petiolar node vs. absolute cephalic size (NSTI/CS): 0.514 . Frontal profile of petiolar node contour line in lateral view shape: convex. Dorso-caudal petiolar profile contour line in lateral view shape: convex. Dorsal region of petiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose. Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.538 . Dorsal region of postpetiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose.Body color: yellow; brown. Body color pattern: body concolorous, only clava darker. Absolute cephalic size: 1062  µm (n = 48). Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule ;Paratypes. Ten workers, a single gyne and two males with the same label data as the holotype under CASENT codes: CASENT0746770, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455429, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455430, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455431, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455432, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455433, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455434, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455435, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455437, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455438, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455439, BLF06201, ; CASENT0455440, BLF06201, ;The list of 54 non-type individuals belonging to 28 nest samples of other material investigated is given in Table In key.CL/CWb): 1.046 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.391 . Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view orientation: converging posteriorly. Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view shape: broadly convex. Vertex contour line in frontal view shape: straight; slightly concave. Vertex sculpture: main sculpture rugose, ground sculpture areolate. Gena contour line in frontal view shape: feebly convex. Genae contour from anterior view orientation: converging. Gena sculpture: rugo-reticulate with areolate ground sculpture. Concentric carinae laterally surrounding antennal foramen count: present. Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.232 . Frontal carina distance vs. absolute cephalic size (FRS/CS): 0.313 . Longitudinal carinae on median region of frons count: present. Longitudinal carinae on medial region of frons shape: forked. Smooth median region on frons count: absent. Antennomere count: 12. Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.907 . Facial area of the scape absolute setal angle: setae absent, pubescence only. Median clypeal notch count: present. Median clypeal notch depth vs. absolute cephalic size (Cdep/CS): 0.022 . Ground sculpture of submedian area of clypeus: smooth. Median carina of clypeus count: present. Lateral carinae of clypeus count: present. Median anatomical line of propodeal spine angle value to Weber length in lateral view: 65–72°. Spine length vs. absolute cephalic size (SPST/CS): 0.385 . Minimum spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPBA/CS): 0.266 . Apical spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPTI/CS): 0.443 . Propodeal spine shape: straight; slightly bent. Apical distance of pronotal spines vs. absolute cephalic size (PSTI/CS): 0.757 . Metanotal depression count: absent. Dorsal region of mesosoma sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Lateral region of pronotum sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Mesopleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Metapleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.268 . Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node angle of deviation from each other: 70°. Apical distance of anterodorsal spines on petiolar node vs. absolute cephalic size (NSTI/CS): 0.354 . Frontal profile of petiolar node contour line in lateral view shape: straight. Dorso-caudal petiolar profile contour line in lateral view shape: straight; convex. Dorsal region of petiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent. Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.543 . Dorsal region of postpetiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose.Body color: brown. Body color pattern: body concolorous, only clava darker. Absolute cephalic size: 1069  µm (n=56). Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule  of Madagascar Fig.  between Taxon classificationAnimaliaHymenopteraFormicidaeCsősz & Fishersp. n.http://zoobank.org/D3643DB1-75EB-415A-9220-9F255A5FCB21Name “spinosus” refers to the short, strong antero-dorsal spines on the petiolar node.Holotype worker.CASENT0443515, BLF05489; MADGAGASCAR: Prov. Toliara, Réserve Privé Berenty, Forêt d’Anjapolo, 21.4 km 325° NW Amboasary, 24°56'S, 46°13'E , 65 m, 7.iii.2002 Fisher et al. (CASCASENT0443515);Paratypes. 24 workers and three males with the same label data with the holotype under CASENT codes: CASENT0443515, BLF05489, ; PageBreakCASENT0443516, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443517, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443518, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443519, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443520, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443521, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443522, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443523, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443524, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443525, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443526, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443527, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443530, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443531, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443532, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443533, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443534, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443535, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443536, BLF05489, ; CASENT0443537, BLF05489, ;The list of 44 non-type individuals belonging to 26 nest samples of other material investigated is given in Table In key.PageBreakCL/CWb): 1.056 . Postocular distance vs. cephalic length (PoOc/CL): 0.374 . Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view orientation: converging posteriorly. Postocular sides of cranium contour frontal view shape: broadly convex. Vertex contour line in frontal view shape: slightly concave. Vertex sculpture: main sculpture rugose, ground sculpture areolate. Gena contour line in frontal view shape: feebly convex. Genae contour from anterior view orientation: converging. Gena sculpture: rugo-reticulate with areolate ground sculpture. Concentric carinae laterally surrounding antennal foramen count: present. Eye length vs. absolute cephalic size (EL/CS): 0.239 . Frontal carina distance vs. absolute cephalic size (FRS/CS): 0.315 . Longitudinal carinae on median region of frons count: present. Longitudinal carinae on medial region of frons shape: forked. Smooth median region on frons count: absent. Antennomere count: 12. Scape length vs. absolute cephalic size (SL/CS): 0.880 . Facial area of the scape absolute setal angle: setae absent, pubescence only. Median clypeal notch count: present. Median clypeal notch depth vs. absolute cephalic size (Cdep/CS): 0.021 . Ground sculpture of submedian area of clypeus: smooth. Median carina of clypeus count: present. Lateral carinae of clypeus count: present. Median anatomical line of propodeal spine angle value to Weber length in lateral view: 65°. Spine length vs. absolute cephalic size (SPST/CS): 0.300 . Minimum spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPBA/CS): 0.212 . Apical spine distance vs. absolute cephalic size (SPTI/CS): 0.307 . Propodeal spine shape: straight; slightly bent. Apical distance of pronotal spines vs. absolute cephalic size (PSTI/CS): 0.677 . Metanotal depression count: absent. Dorsal region of mesosoma sculpture: rugose with areolate ground sculpture. Lateral region of pronotum sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Mesopleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Metapleuron sculpture: areolate ground sculpture, superimposed by dispersed rugae. Petiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PEW/CS): 0.237 . Anterodorsal spines on petiolar node angle of deviation from each other: 60°. Apical distance of anterodorsal spines on petiolar node vs. absolute cephalic size (NSTI/CS): 0.216 . Frontal profile of petiolar node contour line in lateral view shape: straight. Dorso-caudal petiolar profile contour line in lateral view shape: convex. Dorsal region of petiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose. Postpetiole width vs. absolute cephalic size (PPW/CS): 0.491 . Dorsal region of postpetiole sculpture: ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture absent; ground sculpture areolate, main sculpture dispersed rugose.Body color: brown. Body color pattern: body concolorous, only clava darker. Absolute cephalic size: 1021  µm (n=46). Cephalic length vs. maximum width of head capsule  in the southern part of Madagascar Fig. .PageBreakNesomyrmex fauna into four species-groups delimited based on morphological features corroborated by morphometric data (see definition and diagnoses of groups). The within-group diversity of one of these new groups, Nesomyrmexhafahafa group, was revealed by an enhanced hypothesis-free approach. The exploratory NC-clustering  implemented in the package clusterGenomics (part’) assigned observations  into partitions. Gap statistic is a global method, determines the number of clusters based on gap criterion described by A gap statistic algorithm  and the known biogeographic patterns (Fig. Our research demonstrates that combination of NC-clustering with gap statistics and recursive partitioning algorithms performs well in distinguishing partitions in the present data based on morphological distances among nest sample means. Four-cluster hypothesis was returned by both gap statistic Fig.  and recurns Fig. .Nesomyrmex.We highlight the importance and advantages of the combination of NC-clustering with algorithms to statistically infer gaps and create array of clusters. This protocol also has the potential at accelerate and improve taxonomic decision making process considerably by enabling taxonomists to objectively interpret results based on quantitative morphometric data even in a largely underexplored or poorly understood group such as the Malagasy genus Combination of these approaches allows researchers to recognize cryptic species, but also prevent users from inferring overly diverse pattern in the data. A taxonomist without long-term training in a given group can evaluate new specimens and potential new species by repeating the analysis with measurements from new specimens. This method is best included with an integrated approach that includes conventional morphological characters, biogeography, ecology or molecular data.PageBreak


The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Robert Peuß. The correct citation is: Milutinović B, Stolpe C, Peuß R, Armitage SAO, Kurtz J (2013) The Red Flour Beetle as a Model for Bacterial Oral Infections. PLoS ONE 8(5): e64638. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064638


Inorg.  DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814013336/hb7216Isup2.hklStructure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: Click here for additional data file.10.1107/S1600536814013336/hb7216Isup3.cdxSupporting information file. DOI: 1007160CCDC reference:  crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF reportAdditional supporting information:


Tel: +254 20 418 32 39www.kcco.net or contact Genes Mng'anga at genes@kcco.netVisit  Contact Anita Shah admin@cehjournal.orgweb@cehjournal.org or visit www.cehjournal.org/subscribewww.cehjournal.orgwww.facebook.com/CEHJournal/https://twitter.com/CEHJournalVisit us online:


The second author’s name is incorrect. The correct name is Willscott Edward Naugler. The correct citation is: Ellis ECS, Naugler WE, Parini P, Mörk L-M, Jorns C, et al. (2013) Mice with Chimeric Livers Are an Improved Model for Human Lipoprotein Metabolism. PLoS ONE 8(11): e78550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078550


From 2001 to 2011, the percentage of uninsured persons aged <65 years for whom cost was a reason for not having health insurance coverage decreased among uninsured Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic black persons. In 2001 and 2011, uninsured Hispanic persons aged <65 years were more likely than uninsured non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black persons to lack health insurance coverage because of cost.Sources: Barnes PM, Adams PF, Schiller JS. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2001. Vital Health Stat 2003;10(217). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_217.pdf.http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_255.pdf.Adams PF, Kirzinger WK, Martinez ME. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2011. Vital Health Stat 2012;10(255). Available at


The first author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Julian Klein. The correct citation is: Klein J, Darvin ME, Müller KE, Lademann J (2012) Serial Non-Invasive Measurements of Dermal Carotenoid Concentrations in Dairy Cows following Recovery from Abomasal Displacement. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47706. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047706


Phytophthora plurivora. PLoS ONE 9(1): e85368. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085368The third author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Niklaus J. Grünwald. The correct citation is: Schoebel CN, Stewart J, Grünwald NJ, Rigling D, Prospero S (2014) Population History and Pathways of Spread of the Plant Pathogen


Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 380, 20210299. (Published online 15 August 2022). (https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0299)In the original version of this article, references 113–120, 123–140 and 143 were incorrectly numbered.This has been corrected on the publisher's website.


This article has been corrected: In 37154-37163. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16209Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:37154–37163.


Correction: Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 35, 35 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00237-9BLINDED” in the citation  should be changed to the Kinkead et al., 2021.Following publication of this article . Couples’ Extrinsic Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric Validation in a Chilean Population. PLoS ONE2. 16(6): e0252329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329The original article (Kinkead & Riquelme,


J Clin Invest. 2022;132(8):e149160. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI149160Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(4):e169139. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169139Citation for this corrigendum: During the preparation of the manuscript, a histogram for The authors regret the error.


Journal of Biomedical Researchhttps://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20120114,published on 30 September 2013.Correction to:We apologize for the misused images in


Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-022-34269-7, published online 15 November 2022Correction to: In this article the author name M. W. Krone was incorrectly written as W. M. Krone. The original article has been corrected.


Correction: Plant Methods (2021) 17:103 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00802-wIn the Funding information section, the Grant Number was incorrectly given as ‘No. 2019FYD1000900’ and should have read ‘No. 2019YFD1000900’. The original article [


Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 190128010.1002/advs.201901280DOI: In the originally published article there is an error in Figure


This article has been corrected: In 11964-11976. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22600Original article: Oncotarget. 2018; 9:11964–11976.


There is an error in reference 11. The correct reference is:Tu K, Lu K, Zhang Q, Huang W, Xie D. Accurate single-cell genotyping utilizing information from the local genome territory. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jun 4;49(10):e57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab106. PMID: 33619552.


Staphylococcus aureus are presented. They are closely related to prophages that were previously sequenced as part of S. aureus genomes.The annotated whole-genome sequences of five cultured phietaviruses infecting  Staphylococcus aureus is a human commensal bacterium that has the potential to cause life-threatening infection  (http://cab.spbu.ru/software/spades) (http://gravity.cvr.gla.ac.uk)  related to SAP26 (GenBank accession number GU477322 [arbitrarily linearized]). The genomes were reoriented to reflect the termini of Staphylococcus prophages from a closely related genus . Genome annotation was performed as described previously  in Galaxy (https://phrogs.lmge.uca.fr) (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) (http://trna.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE) (http://rssf.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/toolbox/arnold) (https://rfam.xfam.org/search#tabview=tab1) (http://genome2d.molgenrug.nl/g2d_pepper_promoters.php) (Paired-end 2 × 150-bp) sequencing using the Illumina DNA library preparation kit was performed on the NextSeq 2000 system at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS), which provided quality-controlled and trimmed reads. These reads were analyzed using the CPT Galaxy Phage Genome Assembler v2021.01 Workflow (axy-pub)  with SPA/spades) , which pa.ac.uk) , which seviously , 11; open Galaxy  and furt.uca.fr)  and Phyrd=index) , and non0-bp sequ/arnold) , noncodiew=tab1) , and proers.php) , were iders.php)  and SAMtS. aureus genomes .The five SAP genomes are ~43 kb , and porPRJNA857681) (Genomes are available in GenBank (see A857681) . The pha


Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-022-35384-1, published online 13 December 2022Correction to: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE196673 instead of https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE193673. This has been corrected in the PDF and HTML version of the article.The original version of this article contained an error in the “Data availability” Statement. The hyperlink provided for the accession number GSE193673 was incorrectly given as


This article has been corrected: In 58394-58404. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16880Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:58394–58404.


NORTH AMERICA28‐31 July 2022American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Annual Scientific MeetingOrlando, Florida, USAwww.apma.org/events/thenational.cfm17‐20 August 2022Annual Amputation Prevention Symposium (AMP)Chicago, Illinois, USAwww.amptheclimeeting.com/amp‐202226‐28 August 2022Modern Wound Care ManagementStevenson, Wyoming USAmodernwound.comwww. 29 September – 1 October 2022SVM 33rd Annual Scientific SessionsGrand Hyatt Denver, Denver, Colorado USAwww.woundsource.com/resource/svm‐33rd‐annual‐scientific‐sessionsEUROPE19‐20 July 2022International Conference on Novel Biomaterials in Drug Delivery and Wound Care ICNBDDWCCopenhagen, Denmarkwww.waset.org/novel-biomaterials-in-drug-delivery-and-wound-care-conference-in-july-2022-in-copenhagen15‐18 August 2022International Surgical Week 2022 (ISW 2022)Vienna, Austriawww.isw2022.org7‐10 September 2022International Continence Society Annual MeetingVienna, Austriawww.woundsource.com/resource/international‐continence‐society‐annual‐meeting7–10 September 202231st EADV CongressMilan, Italy & ONLINEwww.eadvcongress2022.org14–16 September 2022EPUAP 2022 Prague, Czech Republicwww.epuap2022.org14–17 September 2022Wounds Australia National Conference 2022Sydney, Australiawww.woundsaustralia.com.au/Web/Events/Web/Events/Event_List.aspx16–18 September 202218th Meeting of the Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG)Bratislava, Slovakiawww.dfsg.org/1/dfsg‐2022


Correction: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 10.1007/s00420-022-01922-zhttps://legislation.wa.gov.au/.Work Health and Safety (Mines) Regulations 2022, Available online: https://www.business.qld.gov.au/industries/mining-energy-water/resources/safety-health/mining/hazards/dust/exposure-limits.Exposure limits for dust in mineral mines, Available online: Unfortunately the reference was wrongly published. The correct reference is given below.


Scientific Data10:89; 10.1038/s41597-023-01983-w, published online 11 February 2023.Correction to: In this article the author name Matthew R.V. Ross was incorrectly written as Matthew R. Ross. The original article has been corrected.


This article has been corrected: In 101224-101243. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20642Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:101224–101243.


J Clin Invest. 2019;129(8):3214–3223. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI125915Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(4):169317. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169317Citation for this corrigendum: –/–Pparb Opg-Fc sample. The correct figure is shown below.The authors recently became aware that an incorrect image was shown in The authors regret the error.


This article has been corrected: Due to errors during figure assembly, an incorrect blot was used for the p53 panel in 8270-8283. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2013Original article: Oncotarget. 2014; 5:8270–8283.


Correction: Implement Sci 17, 42 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01211-wFollowing publication of the original article , it was Additional file 1: Appendix A. School Professional Assessment Survey. Appendix B. School Professional Characteristics and Background. Appendix C. Re-Analysis Focusing on CBT Delivery Trends. Appendix D. Missing Data and Imputation.


Correction: BMC Neurol 22, 412 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02926-5Following publication of the original article , the autAli M. AlamJian P. K. ChenGreta K. WoodBethany FacerManeesh BhojakKumar DasSylviane DefresAnthony MarsonJulia GranerodDavid BrownRhys H. ThomasSimon S. KellerTom SolomonBenedict D. MichaelThe original article  has been


J Clin Invest. 2022;132(11):e157549. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157549Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(2):e167843. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI167843Citation for this corrigendum: In The authors regret the error.


This article has an addendum: The patient provided written informed consent.2137-2140. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27598Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:2137–2140.


J Clin Invest. 2022;132(8):e152187. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI152187Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(10):e161559. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI161559Citation for this corrigendum: Following the publication of this article, the authors became aware that an incorrect panel was used for The authors regret the error.


Consent was added to this article: The study, protocol # HRI-0029 is an IRB approved clinical study, WIRB # 20182804, and all patients signed informed consent to participate.1836-1847. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28046Original article: Oncotarget. 2021; 12:1836–1847.


This article has been corrected: In 30992-31002. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16047Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:30992–31002.


Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-022-29714-6, published online 19 April 2022.Correction to: In this article the author name Aurel B. Leuchtmann was incorrectly written as Aurel B. Leuchtman. The original article has been corrected.


This article has an addendum: The authors obtained written informed consent from the patient to publish information and images.1946-1952. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28062Original article: Oncotarget. 2021; 12:1946–1952.


Catula gettyi gen. et sp. nov. (Lauraceae) from the Kaiparowits Formation . PLOS ONE 17(1): e0261397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261397.The fourth author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Joseph J.W. Sertich. The correct citation is: Maccracken SA, Miller IM, Johnson KR, Sertich JJW, Labandeira CC (2022) Insect herbivory on


Consent was added to this article: All patients signed informed consent.4457-4462. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27807Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:4457–4462.


Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-022-27095-w, published online 27 December 2022Correction to: https://www.microsof.com/zh-cn/” instead of “https://www.microsoft.com/zh-cn/”.The original version of this Article contained an error in the legends of Figures 1, 4, 7 and 8, where there provided link was incorrectly given as “Additionally, the provided link in the legend of Figure 3 was incorrect. The legend,https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap”“Types of land use change trajectory. Software: PowerPoint 2021. URL: now reads:https://www.microsoft.com/zh-cn/.”“Types of land use change trajectory. Software: PowerPoint 2021. URL: Lastly, this Article contained an error in the legend of Figure 12, where the provided date was incorrect.https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap.”“The Moran scatter and LISA cluster graph of CSDR in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2015. Map generated with ArcGIS 10.8 (ESRI). URL: now reads:https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap.”“The Moran scatter and LISA cluster graph of CSDR in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2020. Map generated with ArcGIS 10.8 (ESRI). URL: The original Article has been corrected.


Correction: BMC Genomics 23, 709 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08930-wFollowing publication of the original article , the autTherefore, the section should read as follows:Availability of data and materialshttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB40421). fastq files for 21 domestic cat individuals can be found under ENA project PRJNA343389 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA343389).Newly generated whole genome individual sequencing data is available at European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) project number: PRJEB40421 (The original article  has been


J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI89429Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(2):e168068. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168068Citation for this corrigendum: The authors recently became aware that representative illustrations presented in The updated


This article has been corrected: In 86648-86659. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13429Original article: Oncotarget. 2016; 7:86648–86659.


Diaporthe ilicicola is a newly described fungal species that is associated with latent fruit rot in deciduous holly. This announcement provides a whole-genome assembly and annotation for this plant pathogen, which will inform research on its parasitism and identification of gene clusters involved in the production of bioactive metabolites. Diaporthe species  are ascomycete fungi found as saprophytes, endophytes, and plant pathogens . Data will inform research to understand how plant-pathogenic Diaporthe species differ from those that do not cause disease and will aid in the identification of fungal gene clusters involved in bioactive metabolite production.athogens  and are athogens . This reDiaporthe ilicicola holotype strain FPH2015-502 (CBS 144318) was isolated as described by Lin et al. (Diaporthe ilicicola FPH2015-502 was grown in potato dextrose broth for 2 days at 28°C and 150 rpm. DNA was extracted with the DNeasy Plant minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and sequenced with both short- and long-read sequencing. Illumina library preparation and sequencing were conducted at Novogene, Inc., using a NovaSeq 6000 system with paired-end 150-bp reads. The long-read sequencing library was prepared using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies SQK-LSK108 kit under standard preparation conditions with g-TUBE fragmentation. Long reads were sequenced using a Nanopore MinION Mk1B flow cell with R9.4.1 chemistry.2 CBS 14418 was isN50, 7,501 bp) (Diaporthe helianthi strain 7/96 (GenBank accession number MAVT00000000)  (D. helianthi 7/96 strain (GenBank accession number MAVT00000000) (Cytospora leucostoma (BioSample accession number SAMN04099706), Valsa mali (BioSample accession number SAMN03203459), Valsa malicola (BioSample accession number SAMN04099704), Valsa mali var. pyri (BioSample accession number SAMN03203462), and Valsa sordida (BioSample accession number SAMN04099705). The annotation was finalized using a modified version of OrthoFiller v1.2xonq (https://gitlab.com/xonq/orthofiller) referencing 15 Diaporthales species, namely, Coniella lustricola (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Pilidi1/Pilidi1.home.html), Cryphonectria parasitica (BioSample accession number SAMN02744051), Cryptodiaporthe sp. (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Crypto1/Crypto1.home.html), Cryptodiaporthe populea (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Crypo1/Crypo1.home.html), Cytospora chrysosperma (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Cytch1/Cytch1.home.html), Cytospora leucostoma (BioSample accession number SAMN04099706), Diaporthe ampelina (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Diaam1/Diaam1.home.html) (Diaporthe citri (BioSample accession number SAMN15772025), Diaporthe helianthi (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Diahe1/Diahe1.home.html) (Diaporthaceae sp. (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/DiaPMI573_1/DiaPMI573_1.home.html), Lollipopaia minuta (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Lolmi1/Lolmi1.home.html), Melanconium sp. (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Melsp1/Melsp1.home.html), Valsa mali  , and Valsa sordida (BioSample accession number SAMN04099705).For genome assembly and annotation, default parameters were used for all software unless specified otherwise. Illumina read quality was checked using FastQC v0.11.8, and reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.36 (options: HEADCROP:10 CROP:145 SLIDINGWINDOW:50:25 MINLEN:100)  . Hybrid 0000000)  with the0000000) , GeneMar0000000) , BUSCO v0000000) , and AUG0000000) . Protein0000000) , D. heliv1.2xonq  (https:/me.html) , DiaportJALPVH000000000 .The genome was deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number


This article has been corrected: In 1920-1936. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28068Original article: Oncotarget. 2021; 12:1920–1936.


Open. Biol.11, 210199. (Published online 1 September 2021). (https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.210199)Myoviridae in The


This article has been corrected: In 2141-2159. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27329Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:2141–2159.


First published: April 13, 2022https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.16412Volume 36, Issue 3Correction to authorship information as follows.The Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine does not allow 2 corresponding authors or 2 first authors. Dr. Anna R. Gelzer is the corresponding author, not Dr. Cory M. Taschabrunn. Drs. Alexandra V. Crooks and Weihow Hsue contributed equally in their author roles.


J Clin Invest. 2022;132(19):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157399Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(3):e168771. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168771Citation for this corrigendum: After the publication of this article, the authors became aware that the β-actin blot shown in The authors regret the error.


This article has been corrected:3681-3693. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26978Original article: Oncotarget. 2019; 10:3681–3693.


This article has been corrected: In 26527-26542. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25480Original article: Oncotarget. 2018; 9:26527–26542.


J Clin Invest. 2023;133(1):e153733. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI153733Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(4):e169299. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169299Citation for this corrigendum: The title of this paper was incorrect. The correct title is above. The HTML and PDF versions have been updated online. The authors regret the error.


Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B377, 20210178. (Published 21 September 2022) (https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0178)One of the authors' names was spelt incorrectly as Addsion Billing instead of Addison Billing.This has now been corrected on the publisher's website.


Correction: Inflamm Regen 42, 35 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00221-xFollowing publication of the original article , the authttps://www.genome.jp/kegg/. Accessed 27 Jul 2022.48. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The correct version is:48. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.The original article  has been


This article has been corrected: In 19172-19191. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13432Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:19172–19191.


Community Eye Health Journal will be on Neuro-ophthalmology. It will include articles such as ‘Understanding vision and the brain’ and ‘Assessing the neuro-ophthalmology patient’. This issue will not be produced in paper format because of increasing costs in publication and distribution. It will be available online at www.cehjournal.com If you wish to receive an email with a link to download the PDF copy, please send your email address to web@cehjournal.org.The next issue of the Continued Professional Development. Thank you for your understanding.The next paper issue, planned for the end of March 2017, will be on IAPB's General Assembly (10GA), the premier global event discussing public health issues related to blindness and visual impairment, brought together 1,150 eye care professionals from 100 countries in Durban in October 2016.Over the course of three days, there were over 60 sessions with 200 speakers, and over 250 poster presentations. If you couldn't be there, you can catch up on what you've missed:www.iapb.org/10ga-presentationsView and download PowerPoint files of all the talks and presentations from http://atlas.iapb.orgAccess IAPB's Vision Atlas, which was launched at the 10GA. It allows access to the latest data and evidence related to avoidable blindness and sight loss: http://photocomp.iapb.orgEnjoy the photographs entered into the #StrongerTogether Photo Competition. The winners were announced at 10GA and all entries can be viewed at vtc@gju.edu.joEmail: www.health.uct.ac.za or email chervon.vanderross@uct.ac.zaWrite to the Training Coordinator, Lions Medical Training Centre, Lions SightFirst Eye Hospital, PO Box 66576-00800, Nairobi, Kenya.Tel: +254 20 418 32 39www.kcco.net or contact Genes Mng'anga at genes@kcco.netVisit www.cehjournal.org/subscribeadmin@cehjournal.orgFor paper copies, email Anita Shah: web@cehjournal.orgTo receive an alert when a new issue is published, email www.cehjournal.orgVisit us online: www.facebook.com/CEHJournal/https://twitter.com/CEHJournal Lindsley K, Matsumura S, Hatef E, Akpek EK. Interventions for chronic blepharitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 5: CD005556. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD005556.pub2Clearfield E, Muthappan V, Wang X, Kuo IC. Conjunctival autograft for pterygium. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016, 2: CD011349. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD011349.pub2.Ervin AM, Wojciechowski R, Schein O. Punctal occlusion for dry eye syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 9: CD006775. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006775.pub2.Wilhelmus KR. Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, 1:CD002898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002898.pub5.Gichuhi S, Irlam JH. Interventions for squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva in HIV-infected individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 28; 2:CD005643. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD005643.pub3.Gipson IK. The ocular surface: the challenge to enable and protect vision: the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Opht Vis Sci 2007;48(10):4390; 4391-4398.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2886589/Available online: www.tearfilm.org/dewsreport/Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):108-52. Available online: http://tinyurl.com/dry-eye-circleBaudouin C, Messmer EM, et al. Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction. BJO Online First, published on January 18, 2016. Available online:


Scientific Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26760-4, published online 05 January 2023Correction to: The original version of this Article contained an error in Reference 37, which was incorrectly given as:et al. Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol deficiency in tobacco inhibits the cytochrome b6f-mediated intersystem electron transport process and affects the photostability of the photosystem II apparatus. Biochim Biophys. Acta709–722, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.02.013 (1827).Wu, W. The correct reference is listed below:et al. Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol deficiency in tobacco inhibits the cytochrome b6f-mediated intersystem electron transport process and affects the photostability of the photosystem II apparatus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1827, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.02.013 (2013).Wu, W. The original Article has been corrected.


Correction to: BMC Bioinformatics (2022) 23:448https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04983-6Following publication of the original article , the autThe original article  has beenAdditional file 1. supp file 1: filt3r-supp.pdf.Additional file 2. supp file 2: results_sra.xlsx.Additional file 3. supp file 3: accessions.csv.Additional file 4. supp file 4: results-different-k.xlsx.Additional file 5. supp file 5: results-small-k.xlsx.Additional file 6. supp file 6: results-different-perc.xlsx.Additional file 7. supp file 7: results-subsamples.xlsx.Additional file 8. supp file 8: genescan_SRR15006459.pdf.Additional file 9. supp file 9: genescan_SRR15006372.pdf. Additional file 10. supp file 10: accessions-CCLE.csv.Additional file 11. supp file 11: results_simulated_150bp.xlsx.Additional file 12. supp file 12: results_simulated_250bp_hq.xlsx. Additional file 13. supp file 13: results_simulated_250bp_lc.xlsx.Additional file 14. supp file 14: results_simulated_250bp_lq.xlsx.Additional file 15. supp file 15: results_simulated_250bp.xls.


This article has been corrected: In 23020-23032. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15479Original article: Oncotarget. 2017; 8:23020–23032.


In the published article, there was an error with a reference as follows:Exp Toxicol Pathol. (2007) 58:367–74. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2006.11.006.21. Eoi: 10.1007/BF02686024dy of the effects of cadmium and copper on fefails to reduce cadmium-induced oxidative damage in rat liver. The correct reference is below:Exp Toxicol Pathol. (2007) 58:367–74. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2006.11.006.21. Eşrefoglu M, Gül M, Dogru MI, Dogru A, Yürekli M. Adrenomedullin fails to reduce cadmium-induced oxidative damage in rat liver. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.


This article has an addendum: All human tissues were sourced from the IUCPQ Biobank, which includes only patients that have signed a consent form for research.209-220. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27874Original article: Oncotarget. 2021; 12:209–220.


This article has been corrected: In 1894-1910. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27585Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:1894–1910.


This article has been corrected:183-197. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28179Original article: Oncotarget. 2022; 13:183–197.


Psychoradiology were mistakenly published into Precision Clinical Medicine Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2018.In April 2022, three articles intended for the journal The articles were:https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkaa001https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkab001https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkaa002Psychoradiology, Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2021. The publisher apologizes for this error.These articles have now been moved to


Correction to: BMC Women's Health (2022) 22:427 10.1186/s12905-022-02004-5Following publication of the original article , the aut66. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.Also, the in text citation has been changed in the original article.The original article has been corrected.


This article has an addendum: Informed patient consent was obtained.4836-4844. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27848Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:4836–4844.


This article has an addendum: Patient consent was obtained from the patient. This study was approved by the ethical review board of Centre Léon-Bérard.1618-1628. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27563Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:1618–1628.


JCI Insight. 2022;7(13):e136678. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.136678Original citation: JCI Insight. 2022;7(15):e163757. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.163757Citation for this erratum: During the preparation of this manuscript, JCI regrets the error.The


Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B376, 20200086. (Published 17 May 2021). (doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0086)Some funding information was inadvertently omitted from the funding statement.This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 841127.


This article has been corrected: In 131-147. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27413Original article: Oncotarget. 2020; 11:131–147.


First published: 10 June 2021https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.16197Volume 35, Issue 4Correction to the grant/award number for the funder as follows.Funding information: Rural Development Administration, Grant/Award Number: PJ01404502.


J Clin Invest. 2018;128(2):861–875. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI96218Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(16):e163716. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163716Citation for this corrigendum: The authors recently became aware of errors in The authors regret the errors.


Senior editors, editors, reviewers, authors, and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) staff all play important, complementary roles in the scientific publishing process. In 2022, we found ourselves in somewhat uncertain times as the ASM Journals program continued its transition to fully open access. Nonetheless, we are confident that mSphere is well positioned, having been open access since our inception, and with our impact continuing to grow each year. We are encouraged that authors have also voted with their submit buttons, so to speak, continuing to publish their excellent work with us.We have a great end-of-year tradition at Raquel AbadAzar AbadiCelina Monteiro AbreuMichael C. AbtDenise M. AkobKathirvel AlagesanBassem AllamRey Custer AllenRichard A. AlmChristopher AlteriJohn AlverdyAlfred Amambua-NgwaFrancisco AmaroMatthew Zack AndersonLaura Maria Andrade de OliveiraAlex AndrianopoulosLinda S. ArchambaultRobert A. ArkowitzChelsie Elizabeth ArmbrusterPaul M. ArnaboldiGustavo ArrizabalagaSassan AsgariNick AshboltJennifer M. AuchtungMatthew B. AvisonSteffen BackertAnjana BadrinarayananJuhi BagaitkarLauren O. BakaletzJonathon L. BakerScott BalibanJimmy D. BallardMarcela Passos Galluzzi BaltazarJonathan M. BaraschRoman Alfredo BarcoBrianne BarkerSamuel BarnettJavad BaroueiJeremy J. BarrStephen D. BarrLuther A. BarteltChristine Marie BassisAndrea BattistoniClifford J. BeallJessica A. BelserBenjamin Ross BelvinMar BenavidesMaureen BergMegan BergkesselDebra E. BessenKyle BibbyKevin BickerPablo BifaniBlake BillmyreCraig BingmanBrian BirdLogan BlancettJill R. BlankenshipJoseph M. BlissPatricia Pringle BloomKarl W. BoehmeLydia M. BogomolnayaJon BohlinMélanie BonhiversSelina BoppCristian BottaMichael John BotteryTeun BousemaKate BowermanAndrew S. BowmanAllison BradyJonathan BraunMichela BrazzoliBenjamin BrennanDavid J. BrennerChristopher B. BrookeJeremy C. BrownlieEmily A. BruceHarry BrumerCarmen BuchrieserJerry M. BuysseMatthew T. CabeenEdward M. CampbellShengbo CaoGeorge CarnellBerit CarowJaime CarrascoJuan Manuel CarrenoMark CarringtonSarah R. CarterFred CasselsMarco CassoneRoberto CattaneoRodrigo CayôMiguel Angel CevallosBenjamin J. ChadwickChrispin ChaguzaGeorgios ChamilosClara S. ChanJeffrey ChandlerYung-Fu ChangMuhammad Tausif ChaudhryHuirong ChenLiang ChenYe ChenHae Suk CheongMichaelle ChojnackiRebecca C. ChristoffersonAlexander T. CiotaStephen A. ClarkDavid J. ClarkeChristine ClaytonBryan CobbShira Milo CochaviDarrell CockburnJames CollinsSean ConlanBede ConstantinidesLaura CookLaura C. CookIsabelle CoppensTeresa CoqueAngelina CordoneCynthia Nau CornelissenJohn R. CortDoug CossarGeorgina CoxRebecca Jane CoxKathryn CoyneRobert A. CramerNeil CrickmoreAlan CrossLiwang CuiPaul J. CullenKathleen CusickMichael CynamonWei DaiStephen DanielsHeran DarwinSiddhartha DasChandravanu DashRaymond James DattwylerMary E. DaveyMark R. DaviesApril Dawn DavisZeger DebyserMaxime DeforetElizabeth De GaspariChristopher Luis De GraffenriedYe DengNicole J. De NiscoJigar V. DesaiGirmay DesalegnSantosh DhakalVijaykrishna DhanasekaranThomas DickAntonio DiGiandomenicoFrancisco DionisioRichard D. DixYohei DoiMichael S. DonnenbergCurtis DonskeyCharles J. DormanGoncalo dos Santos CorreiaZhicheng DouDavid J. DowlingTimothy B. DoyleJuan DuEdward G. DudleyBreck A. DuerkopJoseph Alexander DuncanJulie C. Dunning HotoppFrank EbelLeo EberlAdrianne N. EdwardsAndrew EdwardsMelissa EllermannJeremy R. EllermeierMostafa S. ElshahedIuliana V. EneOthmar G. EngelhardtMelinda Anne EngevikMarkus EngstlerEeva Liisa Eronen-RasimusJavier Antonio Escobar-PerezJosé A. EscuderoVanessa EspinosaMorgan EvansChristina S. FahertyRefath FarzanaYingang FengYoujun FengKenneth A. FieldsD. Clark FilesMelanie J. FiliatraultLaura FilkinsStefan FinkeDerek J. FisherFabrizio FoieniEdward M. FoxMichael T. FranceBettina C. FriesFriedrich FrischknechtErnesto J. FuentesIwona GabrielStarrett GabrielMichaela Ulrike GackAttila GacserJennifer GaddyRaj GajiEmily GallichotteKetaki GantiDarío García De ViedmaMeritxell Garcia-QuintanillaGregory GavelisMakda GebreJennifer Geddes-McalisterLee GehrkeLorenzo GiacaniTim GilbergerSteven R. GillJoseph James GillespieSusan S. GoldenGustavo H. GoldmanVijay GondilTobias GorisThomas GorochowskiRia GoswamiRevathi GovindLone GramTimothy J. GreenElisabeth GrohmannTrudy H. GrossmanSebastian GuentherPascale GuitonArthur GünzlShashank GuptaEyal GurKiran GurungYitzhak HadarMaria HadjifrangiskouAndrea HahnMohamed A. HakimiRoy A. HallParis S. HammJun HangGeoffrey D. HanniganKyle HappelMd. Manjurul HaqueJustin HardickChristian M. HardingReuben S. HarrisBen M. HauseCynthia Y. HeJianzhong HeNicholas S. HeatonTory A. HendrySteven HennigarFrancisca Hernandez-HernandezLena J. HeungMichael HolickPeiying HongAlexander R. HorswillDaniel K. HoweFupin HuJulian G. HurdleJillian H. HurstBonnie L. HurwitzKevin HybiskeAshraf IbrahimKaoru IkumaIliyan IlievRalph R. IsbergHideomi ItohAngela IvaskGulnaz T. JavanVicki JeffersKelsea A. JewellZhilong JiaBaoming JiangCheng JinJames R. JohnsonWilliam JohnsonClinton J. JonesSheryl JusticeBjörn F. C. KafsackBarbara C. KahlJeremy Phillip KamilJames B. KaperThomas E. Kehl-FieBrendan KellyVolkhard A. J. KempfLily KhadempourM. Firoze KhanShahid M. KhanAnagha KhandekarMegan R. KiedrowskiNicolas KiefferHye Kwon KimPeter E. KimaJohn H. KimbroughSamantha Jane KingStephen KisslerTomoe KitaoEllen KneuferShintaro KobayashiTheresa M. KoehlerMichael H. KogutJames B. KonopkaAnna KonovalovaNicole Marie KoropatkinIoly Kotta-LoizouLukasz KozubowskiFlorian KrammerBarry N. KreiswirthInna V. KriegerErik KristianssonJames W. KronstadCarol A. KumamotoAnand KumarAnuj KumarMukesh KumarAshlan J. Kunz CoyneKyohei KurodaHiroyuki KusadaManish KushwahaJoseph KusiOlaf KutschMamuka KvaratskheliaAbigail L. LabellaBorden LacyMonique LafonGyanu LamichhaneTilman LamparterChung-Yu LanKristin LaneStephanie N. LangelDenis LeclercAllen LeeVincent T. LeeFrancois Le MauffJose M. Lemme DumitSebastian LeptihnCammie F. LesserMichael LetkoJiasui LiLing LiYong LiGeorge LiechtiEfrem S. LimJean LimChi-Hung LinYongxin LinDaniel LindnerNing LingVincenzo LionettiRosalia LiraBinbin LiuJia LiuOlga LomovskayaJason S. LongS. Wesley LongAnja LührmannBrian Michael LunaLiang MaIain MacarthurAntonio MachadoMatthias P. MachnerMarisa MadridFinlay MaguireAndrea MaisnerMichael B. MajorChrister MalmbergAlexander MankinSam MannaShannon D. ManningNicholas J. MantisKevin MaringerClaudia N. H. MarquesFumito MaruyamaSeverine MatheusRosario MatoRobin C. MayJennifer A. MaynardJere W. McBrideShonna M. McBrideBeth A. McCormickElizabeth A. McDanielPatrick McGannLesley McGeeJoy A. McKennaJoseph B. McPheeWim G. MeijerJason MercerTimothy C. MeredithAlita A. MillerKathryn C. Milligan-McClellanCarmen MirabelliDominique MissiakasHeungyun MoonIain M. MorganJames C. MorrisKarl MüngerAlison E. MurrayMario E. MuscarellaEleftherios MylonakisJoe S. MymrykMiki NagaoRyosuke NakaiYu NakajimaJadranka NappiFernando Navarro-GarciaEsther NdungoDavid R. NelsonMartha I. NelsonMinh Hong NguyenWright W. NicholsHelge NiemannLeonardo NimrichterLaura Mary NolanSteven J. NorrisFernanda NovaisDennis NurjadiJoshua J. ObarAllyson F. O'DonnellFrank OechslinKazuhiro OgaiToru OkamotoYusuke OkazakiDaniel Groban OlsonCarlos J. OrihuelaEva Ortega-RetuertaKenji OtaHong-Yu OuBrian PalenikGlen E. PalmerRobert J. PalmerJohn C. PanepintoHuili PangHee-Soo ParkKathryn A. PatrasSara F. PaverJ. S. Malik S. M. PeirisDaniel R. PerezVincent PerretenAndreas PeschelHadrien PeyretCatherine Ann PfisterJody PhelanGorben Peter PijlmanVittal Prakash PonrajMegan PovelonesAditi PrabhakarJacob PriceLance B. PriceBali PulendranDohun PyeonLeimin QianAlison J. QuayleMaxime QuébatteRobert Andrew QuinnTara M. RandisTara M. RandisGauri G. RaoJayne RaperChad A. RappleyeJeremy RatcliffRaveen RathnasingheChristina R. RathwellMichael L. ReeseAaron ReinkeJustin RemaisNilton RennoPeter A. RiceDave RichardJuergen A. RichtJames RiddellDouglas RisserAmariliz RiveraDaniel D. RockeyG. Marcela RodriguezJose-Manuel Rodriguez-MartinezSandra Romero-SteinerMartin RottmanClaudia RückertElizabeth Ann RucksYang RuiThomas A. RussoKathrin RychliRobert SabatiniJaiprasath SachithanandhamMarat R. SadykovXavier SaelensMohammad Mohseni SajadiDavinia Salvachúa RodriguezDerrick SamuelsonJohn C. SamuelsonNicholas D. SandersonSarah E. SansomPanagiotis SapountzisLarry S. SchlesingerThomas M. SchmidtDirk SchnappingerMichael SchuitStefan SchwarzPhillip ScottKelly E. SeatonPatrick R. SecorAnna Maria SeekatzWilliam SelfAnna SelmeckiChetan SeshadriRebecca S. ShapiroAnupam SharmaRoss ShawLilach SheinerAimee ShenTrevor ShoemakerAnton M. SholukhErika ShorL. David SibleyJeffrey SiegelBaneshwar SinghCiaran SkerryJoseph SmithWiep Klaas SmitsSandro Gomes SoaresStephanie D. SongJoseph A. SorgShanmuga SozhamannanJennifer K. SpinlerStanley M. SpinolaShiranee SriskandanRichard StantonGabriel J. StarrettChad SteeleDavid S. StephensWolfgang R. StreitMikael Lenz StrubeXin-Zhuan SuKarthik SubramanianYo SugawaraDaigo SumiNobuhiro SuzukiYasuhiro SuzukiMary Hannah SwaneyJason B. SylvanClifford C. TaggartAkifumi Takaori-KondoMichal Caspi TalRita TamayoSatoshi TamazawaYing TaurSam R. TelfordLesly A. TemesvariSharon Mei TennantBenno Herman Ter KuileRita TewariElitza S. TheelKevin R. TheisTorsten ThomasCecilia ThompsonYun TianMaria TomasDieter M. TourlousseMasanori ToyofukuKatrina E. TraberJohn S. TregoningAndrea TrevisanDavid R. TribbleDavid TurraJane F. TurtonYuki UeharaSvetlana Ugarcina PerovicElizabeth R. UngerJane UsherFrancisco UzalKrystal VailChristiaan van OoijJan-Peter van PijkerenCaroline Elisabeth VisserRomain VolleJay VornhagenSarah VreugdeWillem WaegemanSeth T. WalkDavid H. WalkerDavid A. WalshShanquan WangChongzhen WangLuxin WangTian WangTiffany WeinkopffDavid S. WeissLouis M. WeissVolkmar WeissigStephen Robert WelchKristen E. WendtEric WenzlerEdze WestraDawn WetzelAnnegret WildeMichael R. WileyMary E. WilsonSteven S. WitkinKenneth H. WolfeManuel WoltersPatrick C. Y. WooR. Mark WootenFloyd L. Wormley, Jr.Karen L. WozniakRachel A. F. WozniakXianfu WuXin XuChaoyang XueTetsuo YamaguchiKyosuke YamamotoDong YangYiling YangOzlem YilmazHyunah YoonMikaeel YoungJae-Hyuk YuYunsong YuJoseph P. ZackularMaría Mercedes ZambranoMerve S. ZedenJin ZengBing ZhaiKai ZhangShengda ZhangWei ZhangWeiping ZhangZhaolei ZhangJiangchao ZhaoXian-Liang ZhaoXilin ZhaoChunfu ZhengHaixue ZhengQingfei ZhengXiaoxian ZhongPanpan ZhouErwin G. ZoetendalThe breadth of our scope, encompassing the microbial sciences writ large, means that we depend on a large and diverse pool of reviewers to guide our decisions about manuscripts. Those individuals who helped us this year are listed here and have our sincere gratitude.