fix formatting issues

README.md

@@ -67,15 +67,10 @@ Describe data files
 Ex: All images are named <img_id>.png, each within a folder named for the species. They are 1024 x 1024, and the color has been standardized using <link to color standardization package>.
 -->
 
-
-[More Information Needed]
-
 * **Type:** JPG
-<!-- PNG if we include the smaller images
-* **Size (x pixels by y pixels):** Not yet known (downsized are 256 x 256) -->
 * **Background (color or none):** Sometimes gray sometimes white
 * **Fit in frame:** tight
-* **Ruler or Scale:** Do not think so
+* **Ruler or Scale:** No
 * **Color:** 5x6 Color checker
 
 Potential for future addition of genetic sequencing data.
@@ -88,18 +83,14 @@ The CSV also includes labels regarding the quality of the specimen: `damaged`, `
 
 ### Data Fields
 
-[More Information Needed]
-
-Suggested columns to keep:
-
 **metadata.csv:** minimal data record for the images; this is a subset of all the information potentially available for each image since curation of this dataset is still ongoing. This also means that there are some duplicative columns (e.g., there are multiple NCSU and STRI IDs). 
 - **label:** indicates quality of specimen, either `damaged`, `dorsal`, or `incomplete`.
 - **img_name_no_ext:** `FileName` without the type extension.
-source_url, --not actually a URL. it's a box location, with the folder, seems like something to potentially remove
-source_dataset -- holdover from separating them out, can remove
-- **FileName:** filename given to image (with extension, e.g., ".JPG"). Often (??) `<NCSU_id>_D.JPG`.
-- **Folder:** folder in which images or a record is kept, seems to be date followed by number; part of the "source_url"??
-- **Box:** Box in which specimen was kept? ("Box 11" or "Box 10").
+- **source_url:** not actually a URL, but a box location, with the folder.
+- **source_dataset:** All `STRI`, holdover from combination into larger dataset.
+- **FileName:** filename given to image (with extension, e.g., ".JPG"). Often `<NCSU_id>_D.JPG`.
+- **Folder:** folder in which images or a record is kept, seems to be date followed by number; part of the "source_url".
+- **Box:** Box in which specimen was kept ("Box 11" or "Box 10").
 - **Genus:** genus of the specimen; primarily "Heliconius", but also "Junonia", "Eueides", "Neruda", or "Dryas". Labeled for all images.
 - **species:** species of the specimen; 11 unique species, but mostly "erato" and "melpomene". Labeled for all but six of the images.
 - **subspecies:** subspecies of the specimen if provided, or parent subspecies if hybrid. Labeled for 168 images.
@@ -108,12 +99,13 @@ source_dataset -- holdover from separating them out, can remove
 - **id uncertain:** indicates uncertainty in the taxonomic identity of the specimen? -- 11 images, but there is another image with a question mark in the subspecies name.
 - **sex:** sex of the specimen ("male" or "female", one instance of "?", most labeled).
 
-MULTIPLE IDS -- keep for alignment and standardization later
-NCSU_id, ID from NCSU? Did all values have this or is it just NCSU prefix?
-NCSU #, --relation to NCSU ID and STRI ID?
-stri_id, --relation to NCSU id?
-STRI ID, -- relation to other versions above?
-Other ID,-- relation to other versions above?
+**Columns maintained for future clean-up and recombination**
+- `MULTIPLE IDS` -- keep for alignment and standardization later
+- `NCSU_id`, ID from NCSU? Did all values have this or is it just NCSU prefix?
+- `NCSU_num` (previously `NCSU #`) --relation to NCSU ID and STRI ID?
+- `stri_id`, --relation to NCSU id?
+- `STRI ID`, -- relation to other versions above?
+- `Other ID`,-- relation to other versions above?
 
 
 - **Date Collected:** date specimen was collected? Seem to be mostly DD-MM-YY, but not consistent.
@@ -135,7 +127,7 @@ These images were selected and labeled to use in training the [Imageomics/butter
 
 ### Source Data
 
-Images are of specimens collected by the [Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute](https://stri.si.edu/) and photographs of this subset were taken by Daniel Romero, Carlos Arias, and other members of the Owen McMilan Lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Gamboa Station.
+Images are of specimens collected by the [Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute](https://stri.si.edu/) and photographs of this subset were taken by Daniel Romero, Carlos Arias, and other members of the Owen McMillan Lab at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Gamboa Station.
 <!-- images taken by Christopher Lawrence have not been added yet, curation ongoing -->
 
 #### Data Collection and Processing
@@ -148,12 +140,11 @@ This is what _you_ did to it following collection from the original source; it w
 -->
 
 #### Who are the source data producers?
-[More Information Needed]
 <!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data.
 
 Ex: This dataset is a collection of images taken of the butterfly collection housed at the Ohio State University Museum of Biological Diversity. The associated labels and metadata are the information provided with the collection from biologists that study butterflies and supplied the specimens to the museum.
  -->
-The dataset is a collection of images taken of the McMilan Lab's collection of butterfly samples obtained from field collection surveys and several raised in captivity for genetic and other studies.
+The dataset is a collection of images taken of the McMillan Lab's collection of butterfly samples obtained from field collection surveys and several raised in captivity for genetic and other studies.
 
 ### Annotations
 There are several annotations in this data that are not standard and are very specific. Further annotation is needed. In general, taxonomic information down to the species and subspecies name is provided but is not always correct and needs double checking at this moment.
@@ -162,9 +153,9 @@ There are several annotations in this data that are not standard and are very sp
 Damage annotations were completed by Michelle Ramirez for training the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model she created.
 
 #### Who are the annotators?
-[More Information Needed]
+
 <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
-Annotation data (other than the damage labels) was provided by the McMilan Lab.
+Annotation data (other than the damage labels) was provided by the McMillan Lab.
 
 ### Personal and Sensitive Information
 [More Information Needed]
@@ -173,7 +164,6 @@ For instance, if your data includes people or endangered species. -->
 
 
 ## Considerations for Using the Data
-[More Information Needed]
 <!--
 Things to consider while working with the dataset. For instance, maybe there are hybrids and they are labeled in the `hybrid_stat` column, so to get a subset without hybrids, subset to all instances in the metadata file such that `hybrid_stat` is _not_ "hybrid".
 -->
@@ -182,7 +172,6 @@ Things to consider while working with the dataset. For instance, maybe there are
 This is a small sample of minimally curated butterfly images intended only for wing segmentation and damage detection. It is **not** intended for species classification.
 
 ### Recommendations
-[More Information Needed]
 <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
 
 This is not a complete dataset, nor is it curated for greater use. The purpose of this dataset is to provide the 207 image sample used as part of a larger training set for the [Imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo](https://huggingface.co/imageomics/butterfly_detection_yolo) model. More information on the full project can be found in the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/Imageomics/wing-segmentation).