Update README.md

README.md

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ language:
 
 Use https://mesolitica.com/mallam to generate synthetic Singlish QA,
 
+### Politics
+
 ```python
 [{'role': 'user',
   'content': "Why did Malaysia's former anti-corruption agency, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), face allegations of bias and political interference during Najib Razak's tenure?",
@@ -17,4 +19,10 @@ Use https://mesolitica.com/mallam to generate synthetic Singlish QA,
   'content': "During Najib Razak's tenure as Prime Minister of Malaysia (2009-2018), the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) faced allegations of bias and political interference due to several high-profile cases and controversies. While I cannot access real-time data, I can provide information based on publicly available reports and records. Here are some reasons why MACC faced such allegations during that period:\n\n1. Delayed investigation into 1MDB scandal: The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, which involved alleged money laundering and embezzlement of billions of dollars, became a focal point of the allegations against MACC. Critics argued that MACC had not taken decisive action against those implicated in the scandal, including Najib Razak himself, despite evidence presented by whistleblowers and international media.\n2. Sodomy II case: The MACC was accused of acting on behalf of the ruling government in the highly politicized Sodomy II case against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar was convicted in 2015 on charges of sodomizing a former aide, and critics claimed that the MACC had failed to conduct a thorough investigation into the allegations of political interference and witness tampering in the case.\n3. Appointment process: The appointment process of the MACC chief was criticized during Najib's tenure, with claims that the process was politically influenced. Critics argued that the government had handpicked MACC chiefs who were more likely to be loyal to the ruling party, rather than acting independently to uphold the law.\n4. Whistleblower protection: MACC was also accused of not doing enough to protect whistleblowers, including those who came forward with evidence related to the 1MDB scandal. Critics claimed that whistleblowers faced harassment, intimidation, and even physical threats as a result of their actions, and that MACC had not provided adequate support or protection for these individuals.\n5. Lack of transparency: The MACC's operations and decision-making processes were criticized for being opaque. Critics argued that this lack of transparency left the agency vulnerable to political interference and made it difficult for the public to trust its impartiality.\n\nThese allegations of bias and political interference undermined public confidence in MACC's ability to carry out its mandate to fight corruption effectively and independently. After the 2018 general election, which saw the ousting of Najib Razak's government, the new administration initiated a series of reforms to strengthen MACC's independence and enhance its investigative capabilities.",
   'content_ms': 'Semasa Najib Razak memegang jawatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia (2009-2018), Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) menghadapi dakwaan berat sebelah dan campur tangan politik disebabkan beberapa kes berprofil tinggi dan kontroversi. Walaupun saya tidak dapat mengakses data masa nyata, saya boleh memberikan maklumat berdasarkan laporan dan rekod yang tersedia secara terbuka. Berikut adalah beberapa sebab mengapa SPRM menghadapi dakwaan sedemikian dalam tempoh itu:\n\n1. Siasatan tertunda terhadap skandal 1MDB: Skandal 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), yang melibatkan dakwaan pengubahan wang haram dan penyelewengan berbilion dolar, menjadi titik tumpuan dakwaan terhadap SPRM. Pengkritik berhujah bahawa SPRM tidak mengambil tindakan tegas terhadap mereka yang terlibat dalam skandal itu, termasuk Najib Razak sendiri, walaupun bukti dikemukakan oleh pemberi maklumat dan media antarabangsa.\n2. Kes Sodomy II: SPRM dituduh bertindak bagi pihak kerajaan yang memerintah dalam kes Sodomy II yang sangat dipolitikkan terhadap pemimpin pembangkang Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar disabitkan pada 2015 atas tuduhan meliwat bekas pembantu, dan pengkritik mendakwa bahawa SPRM telah gagal menjalankan siasatan menyeluruh terhadap dakwaan campur tangan politik dan gangguan saksi dalam kes itu.\n3. Proses pelantikan: Proses pelantikan ketua SPRM dikritik semasa tempoh Najib, dengan dakwaan bahawa proses itu dipengaruhi oleh politik. Pengkritik berhujah bahawa kerajaan telah memilih ketua SPRM yang lebih berkemungkinan setia kepada parti pemerintah, daripada bertindak secara bebas untuk menegakkan undang-undang.\n4. Perlindungan pemberi maklumat: SPRM juga dituduh tidak melakukan cukup untuk melindungi pemberi maklumat, termasuk mereka yang tampil dengan bukti berkaitan skandal 1MDB. Pengkritik mendakwa pemberi maklumat menghadapi gangguan, intimidasi, dan juga ancaman fizikal akibat tindakan mereka, dan SPRM tidak memberikan sokongan atau perlindungan yang mencukupi untuk individu ini.\n5. Kekurangan ketelusan: Operasi dan proses membuat keputusan SPRM dikritik kerana bersikap legap. Pengkritik berhujah bahawa kekurangan ketelusan ini menyebabkan agensi itu terdedah kepada campur tangan politik dan menyukarkan orang ramai untuk mempercayai ketidaksepihakannya.\n\nDakwaan berat sebelah dan campur tangan politik ini menjejaskan keyakinan orang ramai terhadap keupayaan SPRM untuk melaksanakan mandatnya untuk memerangi rasuah dengan berkesan dan bebas. Selepas pilihan raya umum 2018, yang menyaksikan penyingkiran kerajaan Najib Razak, pentadbiran baharu memulakan beberapa siri pembaharuan untuk mengukuhkan kemerdekaan SPRM dan meningkatkan keupayaan penyiasatannya.',
   'content_manglish': "Wah, during dat Najib Razak time as Malaysia PM (2009-2018), MACC kena big time lah. People say they biased and kena political interference, especially for big big cases. I cannot check real-time data, but I tell you what I know based on what people say. Here's why MACC kena so much problem during dat time:\n\n1. 1MDB scandal: Wah lau eh, dis one big scandal lah. Billions of dollars gone missing, people say money laundering and embezzlement. MACC supposed to investigate, but people say they slow slow only, especially when Najib kena involved. Whistleblowers and foreign media all say something, but MACC like blur like sotong.\n\n2. Sodomy II case: MACC kena accused of helping government in dis case against Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar kena convicted in 2015 for sodomy, but people say MACC not investigate properly. They say MACC kena pressure from government, so cannot do proper job.\n\n3. How they choose boss: People complain how MACC choose their big boss. Say government pick people who like them, not people who really want to fight corruption. Like dat how to be fair?\n\n4. No protect whistleblowers: MACC also kena say they don't protect people who tell them about corruption. People who give info about 1MDB scandal kena threatened and bullied. MACC supposed to help, but they like siao only.\n\n5. Everything so secretive: MACC very secretive one. People say they don't tell everything, so how to trust them? Like dat how to fight corruption properly?\n\nAll these things make people think MACC not fair and not independent. After 2018 election, new government try to make MACC better. They want MACC to be more strong and can fight corruption properly."}]
-```
+```
+
+### Science
+
+### Math
+
+### Code