Update model card as it was on the original model (#2)
Browse files- Update model card as it was on the original model (e68b583a2a5992f0ff4e86dba429332e139a6d2b)
Co-authored-by: Antoine <[email protected]>
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,4 +1,95 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
pipeline_tag: zero-shot-classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
pipeline_tag: zero-shot-classification
|
| 3 |
+
license: mit
|
| 4 |
+
datasets:
|
| 5 |
+
- xnli
|
| 6 |
+
language:
|
| 7 |
+
- fr
|
| 8 |
+
tags:
|
| 9 |
+
- camembert
|
| 10 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 11 |
+
- nli
|
| 12 |
+
- xnli
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
+
This is a copy of the original BaptisteDoyen/camembert-base-xnli model as it gives a 404 error right now.\
|
| 15 |
+
Here is the model card as it was on BaptisteDoyen/camembert-base-xnli page.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
# camembert-base-xnli
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
## Model description
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
Camembert-base model fine-tuned on french part of XNLI dataset.
|
| 22 |
+
One of the few Zero-Shot classification model working on French 🇫🇷
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Intended uses & limitations
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
#### How to use
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
Two different usages :
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
- As a Zero-Shot sequence classifier :
|
| 31 |
+
```
|
| 32 |
+
classifier = pipeline("zero-shot-classification",
|
| 33 |
+
model="BaptisteDoyen/camembert-base-xnli")
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
sequence = "L'équipe de France joue aujourd'hui au Parc des Princes"
|
| 36 |
+
candidate_labels = ["sport","politique","science"]
|
| 37 |
+
hypothesis_template = "Ce texte parle de {}."
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
classifier(sequence, candidate_labels, hypothesis_template=hypothesis_template)
|
| 40 |
+
# outputs :
|
| 41 |
+
# {'sequence': "L'équipe de France joue aujourd'hui au Parc des Princes",
|
| 42 |
+
# 'labels': ['sport', 'politique', 'science'],
|
| 43 |
+
# 'scores': [0.8595073223114014, 0.10821866989135742, 0.0322740375995636]}
|
| 44 |
+
```
|
| 45 |
+
- As a premise/hypothesis checker :
|
| 46 |
+
The idea is here to compute a probability of the form P(premise∣hypothesis) P(premise|hypothesis ) P(premise∣hypothesis)
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
```
|
| 49 |
+
# load model and tokenizer
|
| 50 |
+
nli_model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("BaptisteDoyen/camembert-base-xnli")
|
| 51 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("BaptisteDoyen/camembert-base-xnli")
|
| 52 |
+
# sequences
|
| 53 |
+
premise = "le score pour les bleus est élevé"
|
| 54 |
+
hypothesis = "L'équipe de France a fait un bon match"
|
| 55 |
+
# tokenize and run through model
|
| 56 |
+
x = tokenizer.encode(premise, hypothesis, return_tensors='pt')
|
| 57 |
+
logits = nli_model(x)[0]
|
| 58 |
+
# we throw away "neutral" (dim 1) and take the probability of
|
| 59 |
+
# "entailment" (0) as the probability of the label being true
|
| 60 |
+
entail_contradiction_logits = logits[:,::2]
|
| 61 |
+
probs = entail_contradiction_logits.softmax(dim=1)
|
| 62 |
+
prob_label_is_true = probs[:,0]
|
| 63 |
+
prob_label_is_true[0].tolist() * 100
|
| 64 |
+
# outputs
|
| 65 |
+
# 86.40775084495544
|
| 66 |
+
```
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
## Training data
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
Training data is the french fold of the [XNLI](https://research.fb.com/publications/xnli-evaluating-cross-lingual-sentence-representations/) dataset released in 2018 by Facebook.
|
| 71 |
+
Available with great ease using the datasets library :
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
```
|
| 74 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 75 |
+
dataset = load_dataset('xnli', 'fr')
|
| 76 |
+
```
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
## Training/Fine-Tuning procedure
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
Training procedure is here pretty basic and was performed on the cloud using a single GPU.
|
| 81 |
+
Main training parameters :
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
- `lr = 2e-5 with lr_scheduler_type = "linear"`
|
| 84 |
+
- `num_train_epochs = 4`
|
| 85 |
+
- `batch_size = 12 (limited by GPU-memory)`
|
| 86 |
+
- `weight_decay = 0.01`
|
| 87 |
+
- `metric_for_best_model = "eval_accuracy"`
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## Eval results
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
We obtain the following results on validation and test sets:
|
| 92 |
+
Set|Accuracy
|
| 93 |
+
---|---
|
| 94 |
+
validation|81.4
|
| 95 |
+
test|81.7
|