MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers
Abstract
MCP-Universe is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate large language models in realistic tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers, addressing challenges like long-horizon reasoning and unfamiliar tool spaces.
The Model Context Protocol has emerged as a transformative standard for connecting large language models to external data sources and tools, rapidly gaining adoption across major AI providers and development platforms. However, existing benchmarks are overly simplistic and fail to capture real application challenges such as long-horizon reasoning and large, unfamiliar tool spaces. To address this critical gap, we introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers. Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching. To ensure rigorous evaluation, we implement execution-based evaluators, including format evaluators for agent format compliance, static evaluators for time-invariant content matching, and dynamic evaluators that automatically retrieve real-time ground truth for temporally sensitive tasks. Through extensive evaluation of leading LLMs, we find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations. In addition, our benchmark poses a significant long-context challenge for LLM agents, as the number of input tokens increases rapidly with the number of interaction steps. Moreover, it introduces an unknown-tools challenge, as LLM agents often lack familiarity with the precise usage of the MCP servers. Notably, enterprise-level agents like Cursor cannot achieve better performance than standard ReAct frameworks. Beyond evaluation, we open-source our extensible evaluation framework with UI support, enabling researchers and practitioners to seamlessly integrate new agents and MCP servers while fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving MCP ecosystem.
Community
๐ MCP-Universe: Real-World AI Agent Evaluation Framework
๐ Excited to share our latest work on evaluating AI agents in real-world scenarios:
๐ Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14704
๐ GitHub: https://github.com/SalesforceAIResearch/MCP-Universe
๐ Website: https://mcp-universe.github.io/
๐ฌ Discord: https://discord.gg/t9tU77GF
What makes this special?
โ
No synthetic benchmarks, actual MCP server interactions
โ
Multi-domain coverage, 3D design (Blender), browser automation, financial analysis, location navigation, repository management, web search
โ
Complex multi-step tasks that require planning and action execution
โ
Dynamic ground truth, not static datasets
๐ Results
Even the best models struggle with real-world tasks:
- GPT-5: 43.72% success rate
- Grok-4: 33.33% success rate
- Claude-4.0-Sonnet: 29.44% success rate
This shows there's still a huge gap between current capabilities and real-world agent performance!
๐ง For Researchers & Developers
The framework provides:
- Custom benchmark creation tools
- Agent orchestration system
- Detailed evaluation reports
- Multi-server integration support
Perfect for anyone working on tool-using agents, multi-step reasoning, or real-world AI applications. Would love to hear your thoughts and see how the community uses this! ๐คโจ
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools? (2025)
- Help or Hurdle? Rethinking Model Context Protocol-Augmented Large Language Models (2025)
- MCPToolBench++: A Large Scale AI Agent Model Context Protocol MCP Tool Use Benchmark (2025)
- SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments (2025)
- CodeAssistBench (CAB): Dataset & Benchmarking for Multi-turn Chat-Based Code Assistance (2025)
- OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows (2025)
- You Don't Know Until You Click:Automated GUI Testing for Production-Ready Software Evaluation (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper