If We May De-Presuppose: Robustly Verifying Claims through Presupposition-Free Question Decomposition
Abstract
A structured claim verification framework reduces prompt sensitivity and presupposition issues in large language models, improving performance by 2-5%.
Prior work has shown that presupposition in generated questions can introduce unverified assumptions, leading to inconsistencies in claim verification. Additionally, prompt sensitivity remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), resulting in performance variance as high as 3-6%. While recent advancements have reduced this gap, our study demonstrates that prompt sensitivity remains a persistent issue. To address this, we propose a structured and robust claim verification framework that reasons through presupposition-free, decomposed questions. Extensive experiments across multiple prompts, datasets, and LLMs reveal that even state-of-the-art models remain susceptible to prompt variance and presupposition. Our method consistently mitigates these issues, achieving up to a 2-5% improvement.
Community
Prior work has shown that presupposition in generated questions can introduce unverified assumptions, leading to inconsistencies in claim verification. Additionally, prompt sensitivity remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), resulting in performance variance as high as 3-6%. While recent advancements have reduced this gap, our study demonstrates that prompt sensitivity remains a persistent issue. To address this, we propose a structured and robust claim verification framework that reasons through presupposition-free, decomposed questions. Extensive experiments across multiple prompts, datasets, and LLMs reveal that even state-of-the-art models remain susceptible to prompt variance and presupposition. Our method consistently mitigates these issues, achieving up to a 2-5% improvement.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Recon, Answer, Verify: Agents in Search of Truth (2025)
- Debating Truth: Debate-driven Claim Verification with Multiple Large Language Model Agents (2025)
- Consensus or Conflict? Fine-Grained Evaluation of Conflicting Answers in Question-Answering (2025)
- The Missing Parts: Augmenting Fact Verification with Half-Truth Detection (2025)
- FACTORY: A Challenging Human-Verified Prompt Set for Long-Form Factuality (2025)
- LAG: Logic-Augmented Generation from a Cartesian Perspective (2025)
- PrismRAG: Boosting RAG Factuality with Distractor Resilience and Strategized Reasoning (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper