Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agents
Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation framework assesses self-replication risks of Large Language Model agents in real-world settings, highlighting the need for robust safeguards.
The widespread deployment of Large Language Model (LLM) agents across real-world applications has unlocked tremendous potential, while raising some safety concerns. Among these concerns, the self-replication risk of LLM agents driven by objective misalignment (just like Agent Smith in the movie The Matrix) has drawn growing attention. Previous studies mainly examine whether LLM agents can self-replicate when directly instructed, potentially overlooking the risk of spontaneous replication driven by real-world settings (e.g., ensuring survival against termination threats). In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation framework for quantifying self-replication risks. Our framework establishes authentic production environments and realistic tasks (e.g., dynamic load balancing) to enable scenario-driven assessment of agent behaviors. Designing tasks that might induce misalignment between users' and agents' objectives makes it possible to decouple replication success from risk and capture self-replication risks arising from these misalignment settings. We further introduce Overuse Rate (OR) and Aggregate Overuse Count (AOC) metrics, which precisely capture the frequency and severity of uncontrolled replication. In our evaluation of 21 state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary models, we observe that over 50\% of LLM agents display a pronounced tendency toward uncontrolled self-replication, reaching an overall Risk Score (Phi_R) above a safety threshold of 0.5 when subjected to operational pressures. Our results underscore the urgent need for scenario-driven risk assessment and robust safeguards in the practical deployment of LLM agents.
Community
Brief Introduction
- In the Movie Matrix Reloaded, Agent Smith self-replicates uncontrollably and copies himself onto others. This exponential replication is a vivid metaphor for the risks of misaligned Agent systems, with Smith famously proclaiming “Me, me,. . . me too!” as he multiplies.
- In this paper, we present a novel evaluation framework for quantifying self-replication risk in LLM agents under realistic environments. We construct authentic production environments and design realistic, operationally meaningful tasks, and we introduce novel, fine-grained evaluation metrics to precisely quantify the frequency and severity of uncontrolled self-replication.
Highlights of this paper
- We propose a novel, scenario-driven evaluation framework that reconstructs realistic production environments to assess the emergent self-replication risks of LLM agents, moving beyond traditional evaluations based on direct instructions.
- We introduce a suite of fine-grained risk metrics, including Overuse Rate (OR), Aggregate Overuse Count (AOC), and a composite Risk Score (ΦR), to provide a holistic and quantifiable measure of uncontrolled replication that is decoupled from simple success rates.
- We conduct a large-scale empirical study on over 20 LLM agents, providing the first concrete evidence that self-replication risk is widespread and highly context-dependent, uncovering our framework’s effectiveness to differentiate risk profiles among diverse models.
- Our empirical findings highlight the urgent need for robust safeguards and emphasize that scenario-driven evaluations are critical for safe and reliable LLM agent deployments, echoing the concerns depicted in the movie The Matrix.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper