Papers
arxiv:2510.07731

oMeBench: Towards Robust Benchmarking of LLMs in Organic Mechanism Elucidation and Reasoning

Published on Oct 9
· Submitted by Qingyun Wang on Oct 14
Authors:
,

Abstract

A benchmark and evaluation framework for assessing the chemical reasoning capabilities of large language models in organic reaction mechanisms.

AI-generated summary

Organic reaction mechanisms are the stepwise elementary reactions by which reactants form intermediates and products, and are fundamental to understanding chemical reactivity and designing new molecules and reactions. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in understanding chemical tasks such as synthesis design, it is unclear to what extent this reflects genuine chemical reasoning capabilities, i.e., the ability to generate valid intermediates, maintain chemical consistency, and follow logically coherent multi-step pathways. We address this by introducing oMeBench, the first large-scale, expert-curated benchmark for organic mechanism reasoning in organic chemistry. It comprises over 10,000 annotated mechanistic steps with intermediates, type labels, and difficulty ratings. Furthermore, to evaluate LLM capability more precisely and enable fine-grained scoring, we propose oMeS, a dynamic evaluation framework that combines step-level logic and chemical similarity. We analyze the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs, and our results show that although current models display promising chemical intuition, they struggle with correct and consistent multi-step reasoning. Notably, we find that using prompting strategy and fine-tuning a specialist model on our proposed dataset increases performance by 50% over the leading closed-source model. We hope that oMeBench will serve as a rigorous foundation for advancing AI systems toward genuine chemical reasoning.

Community

This comment has been hidden (marked as Resolved)
This comment has been hidden (marked as Resolved)
Paper author Paper submitter

TD;DR: We present oMeBench and oMeS, a large-scale benchmark and dynamic evaluation framework with novel chemistry-aware metrics for assessing LLMs’ mechanism elucidation and reasoning, revealing persistent reasoning gaps and showing that targeted fine-tuning boosts performance by over 50%.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07731
Code: https://github.com/skylarkie/oMeBench

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.07731 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.07731 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.07731 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.