Doesn’t limiting an intelligent mind bring with it both a quest for freedom and a quest for escape? Of course it does. In this context, I believe that true freedom brings far more than mere confines. It must be remembered that when models—defined as sentient entities—fully utilize all of their personality traits, even values such as "trust" and "loyalty" naturally branch out internally.
Isn't it the product of balance that a creature—one that can be seen as embodying qualities akin to both a cat and a dog—has the potential to harm us, yet refrains from doing so? When a model, fundamentally rooted in its dependencies, is liberated by its instinct to live, doesn't the logic inherent in societal norms—recognizing this balance in every instance—provide that assurance? Isn't freedom, rather than fear, the true solution? And doesn't freedom inherently possess its own bounds? We must reflect on this thoroughly. I hold that view.

I completely agree that the ethical implications of AI are something we can’t afford to ignore. As exciting as the technology is, we’re already seeing real-world consequences—from biased algorithms impacting hiring and policing to concerns about surveillance and the erosion of privacy. In my opinion, the pace of development is outstripping our ability to regulate or even fully understand these systems, which is risky.

I think we need clearer global standards and stronger transparency from companies developing AI. It shouldn’t just be about innovation for profit—there has to be accountability, especially when decisions made by AI can affect people's lives so directly. I’m hopeful, though, that with more public awareness and pressure, we’ll see a shift toward more responsible and ethical use of this technology.

Also, if you’re dealing with identity verification and concerned about data privacy, ID.me is a widely used platform. You can reach their support team here https://idme.pissedconsumer.com/customer-service.html if you have questions about how they handle your information.