Update README.md

README.md

@@ -12,3 +12,59 @@ tags:
 
 This is a merge of pre-trained language models created using [mergekit](https://github.com/cg123/mergekit).
 
+```python
+question = '''
+Prompt:
+You are a detective investigating a robbery at a museum. The robbery occurred last night between 10 PM and 11 PM. Here are the key facts:
+Security footage shows no signs of entry through the main door.
+The back door was locked, but the key is missing from the security guard's desk.
+A museum employee, Alex, was seen near the guard's desk at 9:45 PM.
+Another employee, Jordan, reported hearing a loud noise from the exhibit hall at 10:15 PM but did not investigate.
+The stolen artifact is a small, lightweight sculpture that could fit in a bag.
+The alarm system was disabled from the control room, but the exact time of deactivation is unknown.
+Task:
+Analyze the situation and determine who is most likely responsible for the robbery. Include your reasoning based on the evidence provided.
+'''
+response = assistant.generate_response(question,  max_new_tokens=2048)
+print(response)
+```
+
+```text
+Based on the evidence provided, I will analyze the situation and determine who is most likely responsible for the robbery.
+
+First, the security footage shows no signs of entry through the main door. This suggests that the thief did not enter through the main entrance. The back door was locked, but the key was missing from the security guard's desk. This indicates that the thief may have obtained the key from the guard's desk or someone else who had access to it.
+
+A museum employee, Alex, was seen near the guard's desk at 9:45 PM. This could mean that Alex was the one who took the key from the desk. Alternatively, someone else could have taken the key, but Alex's presence at the desk at that time is notable.
+
+Another employee, Jordan, reported hearing a loud noise from the exhibit hall at 10:15 PM but did not investigate. This suggests that there was activity in the exhibit hall around that time, which could be related to the robbery.
+
+The stolen artifact is a small, lightweight sculpture that could fit in a bag. This is consistent with the idea that the thief was able to take it without being detected.
+
+The alarm system was disabled from the control room, but the exact time of deactivation is unknown. This means that the thief may have disabled the alarm system themselves or someone else did it for them.
+
+Now, to determine who is most likely responsible, let's consider the possibilities:
+
+1. Alex could have taken the key from the guard's desk and then entered the exhibit hall to steal the sculpture. If Alex was the one who took the key, they could have entered the back door and stolen the artifact. However, the alarm system was disabled, so Alex may have also disabled it or someone else did.
+
+2. Jordan reported hearing a noise at 10:15 PM. If Jordan was the one who stole the sculpture, they may have entered through the back door using the key and then left before being detected. However, the key was missing from the desk, so it's unclear if Jordan took the key or someone else did.
+
+3. Another possibility is that an employee other than Alex or Jordan was involved. For example, a third employee could have taken the key and stolen the sculpture.
+
+However, based on the evidence, Alex was seen near the guard's desk at 9:45 PM, which is a key time. The back door key was missing from the desk, and Alex was present at that time. This suggests that Alex may have taken the key and then entered the exhibit hall to steal the sculpture. The fact that the alarm was disabled could mean that Alex also disabled it or someone else did.
+
+But who else could have disabled the alarm? The control room is another location. If someone else disabled the alarm, they could have done it at any time, but the robbery occurred between 10 PM and 11 PM. The fact that Alex was seen at 9:45 PM near the desk, and the key was missing, suggests that Alex was involved in the theft.
+
+Jordan reported hearing a noise at 10:15 PM, which is during the robbery time. This suggests that Jordan may have been the one who stole the sculpture, but if Alex was already inside the exhibit hall, then Jordan's presence is also a factor.
+
+However, the key was missing from the desk, which suggests that someone took it to enter the back door. If Alex took the key, then Alex could have entered the back door and stolen the sculpture. Alternatively, if Jordan took the key, then Jordan could have entered the back door and stolen the sculpture.
+
+But who was seen near the desk? Alex was seen at 9:45 PM near the desk. Jordan was not mentioned as being near the desk, only Alex. So, Alex was near the desk, and the key was missing. This suggests that Alex took the key and entered the back door. Then, Alex could have stolen the sculpture and possibly disabled the alarm.
+
+However, the alarm was disabled, but the exact time is unknown. If Alex disabled the alarm, they could have done it at 9:45 PM or later. The robbery occurred between 10 PM and 11 PM.
+
+So, the most likely scenario is that Alex took the key from the desk at 9:45 PM, entered the back door, and then stole the sculpture. The alarm was disabled at that time or later, but the thief was able to take the sculpture without being detected.
+
+Alternatively, someone else could have taken the key, but Alex was seen near the desk, so it's more likely that Alex took the key.
+
+Therefore, Alex is the most likely responsible for the robbery.
+```