Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| Objective | |
| This file outlines a structured approach to evaluate the financial health of a company using a set of key financial ratios and metrics. The model analyzes these ratios, applies context-specific logic, and derives a health score on a scale from 1 to 10. This score—known as the QuantiNeuron Health Check Score—serves as a snapshot indicator of the company's current financial viability. | |
| Metrics and Ratios | |
| 1. Liquidity Ratios | |
| Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities | |
| Interpretation: A ratio between 1.5 and 3.0 is generally considered healthy. Below 1 indicates potential liquidity issues, while above 3 could signal inefficient capital allocation. | |
| Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities | |
| Interpretation: A ratio above 1 indicates that the company can cover short-term obligations without selling inventory, suggesting robust liquidity. | |
| Logic: | |
| If Current Ratio < 1 or Quick Ratio < 0.8, mark as “Weak Liquidity.” | |
| If Current Ratio is between 1.5 and 3 and Quick Ratio > 1, mark as “Healthy Liquidity.” | |
| 2. Profitability Ratios | |
| Gross Profit Margin = (Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue | |
| Interpretation: Indicates core profitability before operational expenses. Higher values signal cost efficiency. | |
| Net Profit Margin = Net Income / Revenue | |
| Interpretation: Represents final profitability after all expenses. Higher percentages generally indicate a profitable business. | |
| Return on Assets (ROA) = Net Income / Total Assets | |
| Interpretation: Shows how effectively assets generate profit, with values over 5% considered healthy. | |
| Logic: | |
| High margins and ROA (>5%) indicate strong profitability, labeled as “Strong Profitability.” | |
| If either margin is consistently low (<5%) over recent periods, flag as “Profitability Concern.” | |
| 3. Leverage Ratios | |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity | |
| Interpretation: A ratio below 2 is typically favorable, as it indicates less reliance on debt. | |
| Interest Coverage Ratio = Earnings Before Interest & Taxes (EBIT) / Interest Expense | |
| Interpretation: Values above 3 suggest that the company can comfortably pay its interest expenses. | |
| Logic: | |
| If Debt-to-Equity < 2 and Interest Coverage > 3, label as “Low Financial Risk.” | |
| If Debt-to-Equity > 3 or Interest Coverage < 1.5, flag as “High Financial Risk.” | |
| 4. Efficiency Ratios | |
| Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue / Total Assets | |
| Interpretation: High values indicate efficient asset utilization. | |
| Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory | |
| Interpretation: High turnover rates indicate efficient inventory management. | |
| Logic: | |
| If Asset Turnover is above industry average and Inventory Turnover shows strong movement, mark as “Efficient Operations.” | |
| Low turnover rates suggest operational inefficiencies, flagged as “Operational Concern.” | |
| 5. Growth Ratios | |
| Revenue Growth Rate (year-over-year or quarter-over-quarter) | |
| Interpretation: Positive, sustainable growth indicates business expansion. | |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth = (EPS in current period - EPS in prior period) / EPS in prior period | |
| Interpretation: Consistent positive EPS growth implies profitability and investor confidence. | |
| Logic: | |
| Strong growth in Revenue and EPS indicates “Positive Growth,” while negative trends raise “Growth Concerns.” | |
| Scoring Logic: QuantiNeuron Health Check Score | |
| To derive a QuantiNeuron Health Check Score (1-10), we assign weighted values to each category based on their contribution to financial health. This score is a weighted aggregate that emphasizes profitability and liquidity, followed by leverage, efficiency, and growth. | |
| Step 1: Assign Ratings (1-10) for Each Metric | |
| Based on each metric’s analysis, assign scores: | |
| 10 = Very Strong | |
| 8-9 = Strong | |
| 6-7 = Above Average | |
| 4-5 = Average | |
| 2-3 = Below Average | |
| 1 = Very Weak | |
| Step 2: Weighted Category Score Calculation | |
| Apply weights to each category: | |
| Profitability: 25% | |
| Liquidity: 20% | |
| Leverage: 20% | |
| Efficiency: 15% | |
| Growth: 20% | |
| Calculate weighted scores for each category: | |
| Category Score | |
| = | |
| ( | |
| Category Rating | |
| ) | |
| × | |
| Weight | |
| Category Score=(Category Rating)×Weight | |
| Step 3: Aggregate for Final Score | |
| Sum up the weighted scores to derive a total score out of 10. | |
| Step 4: Determine Health Check Tier | |
| Score 9-10: “Excellent Health” (Low risk, high profitability) | |
| Score 7-8: “Good Health” (Generally strong but minor areas to improve) | |
| Score 5-6: “Moderate Health” (Mixed performance; moderate risk) | |
| Score 3-4: “Poor Health” (Significant concerns in multiple areas) | |
| Score 1-2: “Critical Health” (Severe financial distress) | |
| Example Walkthrough | |
| If the model processes a company and finds: | |
| Liquidity metrics in the healthy range, | |
| Profitability metrics above average, | |
| High leverage ratios, | |
| Efficient operations, | |
| Moderate growth, | |
| The model might assign: | |
| Liquidity = 7, Profitability = 9, Leverage = 4, Efficiency = 8, Growth = 6 | |
| Calculating weighted scores: | |
| Liquidity Score = | |
| 7 | |
| × | |
| 0.2 | |
| = | |
| 1.4 | |
| 7×0.2=1.4 | |
| Profitability Score = | |
| 9 | |
| × | |
| 0.25 | |
| = | |
| 2.25 | |
| 9×0.25=2.25 | |
| Leverage Score = | |
| 4 | |
| × | |
| 0.2 | |
| = | |
| 0.8 | |
| 4×0.2=0.8 | |
| Efficiency Score = | |
| 8 | |
| × | |
| 0.15 | |
| = | |
| 1.2 | |
| 8×0.15=1.2 | |
| Growth Score = | |
| 6 | |
| × | |
| 0.2 | |
| = | |
| 1.2 | |
| 6×0.2=1.2 | |
| Total Health Check Score = | |
| 1.4 | |
| + | |
| 2.25 | |
| + | |
| 0.8 | |
| + | |
| 1.2 | |
| + | |
| 1.2 | |
| = | |
| 6.85 | |
| 1.4+2.25+0.8+1.2+1.2=6.85 | |
| Output | |
| you will return: | |
| A QuantiNeuron Health Check Score on a 1-10 scale. | |
| A Health Summary, outlining strengths and weaknesses based on metrics. | |
| A Recommendation Statement, if necessary, for areas needing attention. | |