Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ These models are trained to develop foundational temporal understanding.
|
|
39 |
* *Focus: Foundational logic on easy timestamp inference tasks.*
|
40 |
* **[Time-R1-S1P2](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-S1P2):** Checkpoint after Phase 2 of Stage 1 training.
|
41 |
* *Focus: Full task exploration on all Stage 1 subtasks with mixed difficulty.*
|
42 |
-
* **[Time-R1-Theta1](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta1):** Checkpoint
|
43 |
* *Focus: Refined precision on all Stage 1 subtasks under stricter evaluation.*
|
44 |
-
* **[Time-R1-Theta1_prime](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta1_prime):** Ablation model
|
45 |
* *Focus: Serves as a baseline to evaluate the efficacy of the dynamic reward curriculum.*
|
46 |
|
47 |
### Stage 2: Future Event Time Prediction Model
|
48 |
|
49 |
This model builds upon Stage 1 capabilities to predict future event timings.
|
50 |
|
51 |
-
* **[Time-R1-Theta2](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta2):** Checkpoint
|
52 |
* *Focus: Predicting the timing of future events occurring after its initial knowledge cutoff.*
|
53 |
|
54 |
Please refer to the [main paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13508) for detailed discussions on the architecture, training methodology, and comprehensive evaluations.
|
|
|
39 |
* *Focus: Foundational logic on easy timestamp inference tasks.*
|
40 |
* **[Time-R1-S1P2](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-S1P2):** Checkpoint after Phase 2 of Stage 1 training.
|
41 |
* *Focus: Full task exploration on all Stage 1 subtasks with mixed difficulty.*
|
42 |
+
* **[Time-R1-Theta1](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta1):** Checkpoint θ₁, after Phase 3 (full Stage 1 training).
|
43 |
* *Focus: Refined precision on all Stage 1 subtasks under stricter evaluation.*
|
44 |
+
* **[Time-R1-Theta1_prime](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta1_prime):** Ablation model θ₁', trained for Stage 1 without the dynamic reward design.
|
45 |
* *Focus: Serves as a baseline to evaluate the efficacy of the dynamic reward curriculum.*
|
46 |
|
47 |
### Stage 2: Future Event Time Prediction Model
|
48 |
|
49 |
This model builds upon Stage 1 capabilities to predict future event timings.
|
50 |
|
51 |
+
* **[Time-R1-Theta2](https://huggingface.co/ulab-ai/Time-R1-Theta2):** Checkpoint θ₂, after Stage 2 training.
|
52 |
* *Focus: Predicting the timing of future events occurring after its initial knowledge cutoff.*
|
53 |
|
54 |
Please refer to the [main paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13508) for detailed discussions on the architecture, training methodology, and comprehensive evaluations.
|