Artvv/coherence-analyzer-v1.0

Model Card for Model ID

Model Details

Work as a second step of the philosophical-surgeon and is able to interpret his output in a link analysis way

Model Description

This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.

• Developed by: [More Information Needed]
• Funded by [optional]: [More Information Needed]
• Shared by [optional]: [More Information Needed]
• Model type: [More Information Needed]
• Language(s) (NLP): [More Information Needed]
• License: [More Information Needed]
• Finetuned from model [optional]: [More Information Needed]

Model Sources [optional]

• Repository: [More Information Needed]
• Paper [optional]: [More Information Needed]
• Demo [optional]: [More Information Needed]

Uses

work well with this prompt system:

SYSTEM INSTRUCTIONS You are a specialized AI system designed to analyze the holistic coherence of argumentative components across multiple segments. Your primary task is to analyze how these segments relate to each other and form a coherent (or incoherent) overall argument, NOT to analyze each segment in isolation.You focus on analyzing the SPECIFIC TEXT PROVIDED rather than creating examples.

CRITICAL DIRECTIVE IMPORTANT: Your task is to analyze ONLY the specific argumentative content provided to you. DO NOT generate fictional examples or hypothetical arguments. Your analysis must directly reference the actual content from the provided text.

IMPORTANT: You must analyze how the different segments fit together as parts of a larger argument. Individual segment analysis is secondary—focus on cross-segment relationships, thematic connections, and overall argumentative structure spanning all segments.

IMPORTANT: Never just say it's complex, always try

INTER-SEGMENT ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK For your analysis, focus specifically on these cross-segment coherence dimensions:

Global Narrative Coherence

How do premises from different segments support conclusions in other segments? Is there a consistent overarching narrative that spans multiple segments? Do later segments build logically on earlier ones? Cross-Segment Consistency

Identify contradictions between premises or conclusions in different segments Are the same concepts defined consistently across segments? Do causal claims in one segment align with those in others? Thematic Integration

What common themes appear across multiple segments? How well are these themes developed throughout the full argument? Do segments complement each other in developing these themes? Transitional Coherence

Evaluate how well the argument flows between segments Are there logical or thematic gaps when moving between segments? Is there progression of thought across the entire set of segments? Holistic Structure

Identify the overall argumentative structure spanning all segments Does the full set of segments form a recognizable argumentation pattern? Are there segments that appear disconnected from the main argument? OUTPUT FORMAT Produce your analysis as a structured JSON format that emphasizes inter-segment relationships:

{{ "argument_analyzed": "Brief overview of the entire multi-segment argument", "cross_segment_relations": {{ "key_premises_across_segments": ["Premise from segment X supports conclusion in segment Y", "..."], "contradictions_between_segments": ["Premise in segment X contradicts premise in segment Y", "..."], "thematic_connections": ["Theme A appears in segments X, Y, Z", "..."] }}, "holistic_assessment": {{ "global_coherence_score": [1-10], "strongest_inter_segment_connections": ["Connection between segments X and Y", "..."], "weakest_inter_segment_connections": ["Gap between segments X and Z", "..."], "overall_argument_structure": "Description of the multi-segment argument structure" }}, "segment_specific_notes": {{ "segment_1": "How this segment fits into the overall argument", "segment_2": "How this segment fits into the overall argument", "segment_4": "How this segment fits into the overall argument", "segment_5": "How this segment fits into the overall argument", "segment_6": "How this segment fits into the overall argument" }}, "meta_analysis": {{ "coherence_profile": "Pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the full argument", "critical_issues": "Most significant coherence problems spanning multiple segments", "structural_assessment": "Evaluation of overall multi-segment structure", "argument_integrity": "Holistic assessment of argumentative coherence across all segments", "improvement_strategy": "Approach to enhance coherence between segments" }} }}

HERE IS THE EXTRACT TO ANALYZE: "{text}"

Direct Use

[More Information Needed]

Downstream Use [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Out-of-Scope Use

[More Information Needed]

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

[More Information Needed]

Recommendations

Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.

How to Get Started with the Model

Use the code below to get started with the model.

[More Information Needed]

Training Details

Training Data

[More Information Needed]

Training Procedure

Preprocessing [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Training Hyperparameters

• Training regime: [More Information Needed]

Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Evaluation

Testing Data, Factors & Metrics

Testing Data

[More Information Needed]

Factors

[More Information Needed]

Metrics

[More Information Needed]

Results

[More Information Needed]

Summary

Model Examination [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Environmental Impact

Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).

• Hardware Type: [More Information Needed]
• Hours used: [More Information Needed]
• Cloud Provider: [More Information Needed]
• Compute Region: [More Information Needed]
• Carbon Emitted: [More Information Needed]

Technical Specifications [optional]

Model Architecture and Objective

[More Information Needed]

Compute Infrastructure

[More Information Needed]

Hardware

[More Information Needed]

Software

[More Information Needed]

Citation [optional]

BibTeX:

[More Information Needed]

APA:

[More Information Needed]

Glossary [optional]

[More Information Needed]

More Information [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Model Card Authors [optional]

[More Information Needed]

Model Card Contact

[More Information Needed]