If's picture

If

Labif
3 25
Β·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

liked a dataset 8 days ago
nvidia/simready-assets
reacted to tardellirs's post with πŸ”₯ 8 days ago
Model cards say what a model is: a fine-tune of X, a quantization of Y. I built Weightprint to check that against the weights. App: https://huggingface.co/spaces/tardellirs/weightprint Data (every pair, and the copy groups): https://huggingface.co/datasets/tardellirs/weightprint It reads the header and a few bytes of every tensor (no downloads) and compares a model with the parent its card declares. 120,976 models so far. Some of what came out: - 7% of the declared fine-tunes we could compare (1,630 of 22,847) hold their parent's weights unchanged. (Corrected from 12%: quants whose values the engine doesn't decode, like bitsandbytes and FP8, had been counted as unchanged. Thanks @dipankarsarkar for the question that caught it.) - 27% of the fine-tunes we could compare are LoRA-style: only the attention and MLP matrices moved, norms and embeddings untouched. That share went from 10% in 2023 to 28% in 2026. - Of 1,668 fine-tunes named abliterated, uncensored or heretic, 53% edit only the matrices that write to the residual stream, the signature of an abliteration. The rest were trained further, merged, or are the parent's weights. - 51% of the weight bytes on the Hub are byte-for-byte repeats of another repo's files. Search any Hub id to see which layers and parts changed against its parent, or compare any two models. A sample per tensor can miss things, and some formats can't be compared yet. If a verdict on a model you know looks wrong, tell me here and I'll check it against the engine. That's what this post is for, before a longer write-up.
View all activity

Organizations

None yet