Local model only has some SERIOUS issues.
Why the AR changes? I do anything, and it pushes the camera in or pulls it out. Leave the image in its original condition as Kontext does. Then the fact it changes faces for real work destroyed this model and I was hoping for a Kontext killer.
Either the workflow provided for ComfyUI is bad, or this model needs to go back in the oven. With the AR issues, and face issues I am unsure what is going on. I have seen AR issues back with SD2.0 and why 2.1 was created to fix that (mostly did but not always) but with changing Aspect Ratios and faces I find zero use for this. A bit sad about that, and hope some fix arrives soon.
same problem, a very strange thing is when using qwen chat got simliar and no AR changes result, so I guess the provided huggingface pipeline has some problems
Agreed. Hoping a fix comes soon as this is a good model otherwise.
After spending days, and days, on this model, I can safely say that it is damn near worthless for real work. Devs, what is up with the image in, change zooms, aspect ratio, etc... on the image out? Flux Kontext does not do this at all. In other words, this model is just not fit for real editing. Did you just pump and dump, or did any real, and thorough, testing happen? I know that sounds mean, but there is just no way should a model have this many issues if it was really tested in an actual image editing environment. Love what it can do, but what it changes nullifies the model completely. Image A, edit, Image B. Image B should be 100% perfectly aligned with image A with the modifications requested.
Frustrated, yes, because this had so much potential, still does if fixed, to be knee capped, and flat lined, due to those VERY terrible issues. Here is hoping you race to fix this and it is a simple (maybe VAE) fix. Looking forward to when that happens.
I always imagined there's something wrong with the image resize node in the workflow, but found out that isn't the case.
Did some testing, and looks like the zoom level differs depending on the input's AR. I got less zoom when I made my image square. I assume there are safe sizes that doesn't cause this issue, but who has a GPU that doesn't crash every other image to test the theory?
I never crashed. The deal with Flux Kontext is that it does have a node for safe AR, but I deleted that right off. 99% no issue. I have yet to get this one to never not screw with it. Leave the AR/zoom alone so I can drag it into PS and have a one to one to make further changes/edits. Sadly, this one can't do that.
Hi guys, https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI/issues/9481 This issue discussed this problem, for diffuser's users, a simple but useful solution is resizing the input image using the following size: (1024x1024γ1184x880γ1392x752γ1568x672).
That is a bandage, when Flux Kontext doe not need that. Not sure why Kontext doesn't need a fixed size for 99% of the time for me and this one does?
After spending days, and days, on this model, I can safely say that it is damn near worthless for real work. Devs, what is up with the image in, change zooms, aspect ratio, etc... on the image out? Flux Kontext does not do this at all. In other words, this model is just not fit for real editing. Did you just pump and dump, or did any real, and thorough, testing happen? I know that sounds mean, but there is just no way should a model have this many issues if it was really tested in an actual image editing environment. Love what it can do, but what it changes nullifies the model completely. Image A, edit, Image B. Image B should be 100% perfectly aligned with image A with the modifications requested.
Frustrated, yes, because this had so much potential, still does if fixed, to be knee capped, and flat lined, due to those VERY terrible issues. Here is hoping you race to fix this and it is a simple (maybe VAE) fix. Looking forward to when that happens.
Agreed!
I've tried a couple of times the new 2509 model and it doesn't seem to have the same issue.
Want to bet? Right off I tested this. Saw it, did a damn, and aligned layers in PS, sure as sin it not only had changed the zooms, AR, it even had skewed the image it gave.