the test table does not correspond to the truth
this model is not equal to and certainly not superior to qwq, I ran my programming tests and was disappointed.
A disappointing version. I didn't find any expected improvement compared to qwen, although I don't want to think it's just for stock price speculation.
this model is not equal to and certainly not superior to qwq, I ran my programming tests and was disappointed.
The table presents QwQ-Preview, not the final version if it's was you are comparing against.
this model is not equal to and certainly not superior to qwq, I ran my programming tests and was disappointed.
The table presents QwQ-Preview, not the final version if it's was you are comparing against.
I can read and see what's in the table. There is nothing to compare this model with, it is a game for company shares. And you want to say that it surpasses the preview, which was naturally meant in the first post.
there would be no dissatisfaction if honest information were simply provided, I love xiaomi's nonsense, I have been using their phones for a long time. Well, here's the proto disappointment.
this model is not equal to and certainly not superior to qwq, I ran my programming tests and was disappointed.
The table presents QwQ-Preview, not the final version if it's was you are comparing against.
I can read and see what's in the table. There is nothing to compare this model with, it is a game for company shares. And you want to say that it surpasses the preview, which was naturally meant in the first post.
The problem can be seen from the chart it displays. Leaving aside the arbitrary parameters filled in by Xiaomi, DS's 7B distillation model based on Qwen is much stronger than Qwen's own 32B model. The only explanation is to cater to the strong public impression of DS. This is parameter fraud.
I can read and see what's in the table.
I didn't want to offense, just help in case.
it is a game for company shares.
Maybe a valid point, I don't position myself on this.
And you want to say that it surpasses the preview
You are putting words in my mouth I never said. Just wanted to point it to you as you simply said "qwq" and I know the difference is substantial between preview and final for this particular model.
which was naturally meant in the first post
Appreciating the tone of your answer when I just wanted to help in case there was a misunderstanding, because that could have been myself...
I have been using their phones for a long time
I wouldn't...
I can read and see what's in the table.
I didn't want to offense, just help in case.
it is a game for company shares.
Maybe a valid point, I don't position myself on this.
And you want to say that it surpasses the preview
You are putting words in my mouth I never said. Just wanted to point it to you as you simply said "qwq" and I know the difference is substantial between preview and final for this particular model.
which was naturally meant in the first post
Appreciating the tone of your answer when I just wanted to help in case there was a misunderstanding, because that could have been myself...
I have been using their phones for a long time
I wouldn't...
I'm sorry for my temper. you're right about qwq. Do you think that the model matches xiaomi's description and is it fair to us? By the way, the black shark is a high-quality phone, it's been 3 years, everything is super.
I'm sorry for my temper. you're right about qwq. Do you think that the model matches xiaomi's description and is it fair to us?
I don't know, I haven't been trying the model (and am not interested in).
It really sounds like a troll, but I'm not 😂 I was actually just passing by when I saw it pop, and checked the discussions by curiosity.
I would just say: if you can fit Qwen3-30B-A3B by any mean whether its RAM or VRAM, it should be much more worth it! 3B is fast, even on CPU! For Q4_K_XL (Unsloth's) for example, it takes 20GB for 16K tokens. For 24GB 64K tokens.