uid
int64 7.2k
9.09k
| person
stringlengths 6
29
| institution_name
stringlengths 11
62
| pdf_files
sequencelengths 0
22
| pdf_data
stringlengths 2
1.56M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
7,934 | Roberto González Echevarría | Yale University | [
"7934_101.pdf",
"7934_102.pdf"
] | {"7934_101.pdf": "Donate | Read the Print Edition Subscribe | Join the 22, 2025 Spanish prof on unexpected leave | 3:08 09, 2016 Amid persistent allegations of sexual harassment and abuse of power within the Spanish and Portuguese Department, Spanish professor Roberto Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda \u201970 \u2014 who has been at the heart of many of the allegations \u2014 is not at Yale this term, although no public explanation of his absence has been given. Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda\u2019s absence has become something of a taboo subject within a department already plagued by confusion and secrecy, according to faculty members, graduate students and undergraduates interviewed. The professor\u2019s two undergraduate courses, one about \u201cDon Quixote\u201d and the other about Spanish Golden Age theater, were unexpectedly canceled from online course offerings in late August, with no explanation given to students or staff. The Provost\u2019s Office sent a confidential memo on Aug. 31 to the ladder faculty in the Spanish and Portuguese and Comparative Literature \uf002 2/22/25, 8:27 Spanish prof on unexpected leave - Yale Daily News 1/4 Departments, in which Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda holds appointments, although professors interviewed would only confirm the existence of the memo, not its contents or whether it addressed Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda\u2019s one-semester leave of absence. The controversy surrounding Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda, a professor renowned for his scholarship in Spanish literature, first emerged in March 2015, when an anonymous group of graduate students wrote a letter to the department and University administrators decrying the allegedly negative atmosphere and abuse of power within the department. The letter singled out Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda, accusing him of sexual harassment. The department has also struggled in the past two admissions cycles, not matriculating a single new graduate student. The department\u2019s youngest graduate students are currently in their third year, meaning they have already finished their graduate coursework. Professors in the department were told this spring to adjust their teaching schedules as they would only be teaching undergraduate courses. In response to the department\u2019s struggles, University administrators announced in spring 2015 a broad review of the department, which led to changes such as a mandatory sexual harassment training session for the department\u2019s faculty members and the arrival of an external director of graduate students. However, the review did not recommend any disciplinary action against faculty members, and administrators never publicly linked the sexual harassment training to the allegations against Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda. Now, his unexplained absence has left some students searching for answers but afraid to ask for them wanted to take one or even two of [Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda\u2019s] classes, so the cancellations really left a big hole in my schedule,\u201d said an undergraduate Spanish major, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue have asked a couple of professors and they 2/22/25, 8:27 Spanish prof on unexpected leave - Yale Daily News 2/4 avoided the topic. In this department, you can\u2019t ask certain things or people might get mad or offended. The information is so contained but it affects everyone.\u201d Two undergraduate Spanish majors and two graduate students in the department interviewed said they did not know why Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda was taking a leave of absence, although they had all heard about the previous allegations against the professor. One Spanish undergraduate major said there is a sense that the Gonz\u00e1lez Echevarr\u00eda\u2019s absence is a \u201chidden\u201d topic, as faculty members the student has reached out to either did not know the situation or could not talk about it department source knowledgeable about the situation, who also requested anonymity, said that the provost\u2019s memo was \u201cstrictly confidential.\u201d The source said the administration\u2019s lack of transparency in addressing issues in the department is ironic, as the department\u2019s opaque decision-making process is one of the issues that caused the initial discontent and subsequent review think the University administration is creating more problems for itself by adopting such an absurdly secretive policy,\u201d the source said. The cancellation of the two courses has also caused logistical difficulties. The source noted that the changes mean that upper-level seminars have to take in many more students than is usually allowed. Various administrators interviewed confirmed Gonzalez Echevarria\u2019s leave of absence but declined to comment further. Department Chair Rolena Adorno said Gonzalez Echevarria will return to teaching in the spring. Faculty of Arts and Sciences Dean Tamar Gendler said faculty members take leaves of absences for a variety of reasons, but said she 2/22/25, 8:27 Spanish prof on unexpected leave - Yale Daily News 3/4 could not comment further on specific cases out of respect for the privacy of faculty members CO., INC. 202 York Street, New Haven 06511 | (203) 432-2400 Editorial: (203) 432-2418 | [email protected] Business: (203) 432-2424 | [email protected] 2025 2/22/25, 8:27 Spanish prof on unexpected leave - Yale Daily News 4/4", "7934_102.pdf": "Donate | Read the Print Edition Subscribe | Join the 22, 2025 Former Spanish prof alleges sexual harassment, retaliatory firing in lawsuit | 3:04 07, 2017 Susan Byrne, a former professor in the Spanish and Portuguese Department, has filed a lawsuit claiming that she faced sexual harassment and bullying from professors in the department and was denied tenure for speaking out against it. The lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, claims that the department perpetuated a culture of harassment and discrimination. It levels multiple allegations against Roberto Gonzalez Echevarria \u201970, a professor of Hispanic and comparative literatures, claiming he repeatedly made crude comments to and about female professors in the department, played with the hair of undergraduate and graduate students and \uf002 2/22/25, 8:27 Former Spanish prof alleges sexual harassment, retaliatory firing in lawsuit - Yale Daily News 1/4 \u201csurprised\u201d Byrne with a kiss on the mouth in front of hundreds of colleagues at a 2014 party. The Spanish and Portuguese Department has faced repeated allegations of sexual misconduct and misuse of power over the last three years. The University\u2019s spring 2015 climate review, which concluded in December of that year, led to a series of changes in both leadership and organization. According to the lawsuit, Echevarria, department chair Rolena Adorno and department professor Noel Valis made \u201cunsupportive and negative\u201d statements to Byrne about her work between October 2014 and February 2015 \u201cin retaliation for plaintiff\u2019s speaking out against discrimination and harassment and to deny plaintiff a full-year sabbatical awarded under Yale University\u2019s tenure-track system to all associate professors on term.\u201d Byrne was denied tenure in 2015 and terminated from Yale on June 30 following months of appeals, per the lawsuit. She claims that her going public about the department\u2019s \u201cdiscriminatory practices in tenure cases\u201d in February 2015 at a University forum attended by faculty members and administrators resulted in her being \u201ccast out as a victim.\u201d \u201cDefendant acted with reckless disregard for Plaintiff\u2019s right to be free of retaliation for her speech related to sexual harassment and discrimination involving members of the Department and students under the care and supervision of the Department,\u201d the lawsuit reads. University spokesman Tom Conroy declined to comment on the suit. Byrne had been at the University since 2008, underwent tenure review in 2015 and learned she had been denied in early 2016, a decision she twice appealed through the Provost\u2019s Office. The vote to deny Byrne tenure was 3-2. Despite a request for the administration 2/22/25, 8:27 Former Spanish prof alleges sexual harassment, retaliatory firing in lawsuit - Yale Daily News 2/4 to recuse Echevarria, Adorno and Valis from the vote, they were allowed to participate and each voted against granting Byrne tenure. The three professors involved have since been removed from their leadership positions within the department. \u201cThey had an excellent scholar, someone who was top notch in her field and declared so by the same people who, after she came out and provided information about the harassment going on, decided that the very same work they said was excellent was not good enough,\u201d said Jacques Parenteau, Byrne\u2019s attorney. \u201cYou don\u2019t have to go to Yale to figure out this is retaliation.\u201d The lawsuit alleges violations of Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, and seeks Byrne\u2019s reinstatement as associate professor with tenure and punitive damages. Parenteau said that per state proceedings, Byrne filed her claim in the summer of 2016 and it that has remained pending at the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities for a year, adding that the University could have offered her the available \u201cremedy\u201d \u2014 an apology and reinstatement with tenure \u2014 during that period trial will not occur for at least a year, Parenteau said, as federal court cases typically do not go to trial for 18 months. Byrne \u2014 who was granted her request for an unpaid leave of absence for the 2016\u201317 academic year and permission to hold a position at another university during that time \u2014 joined the faculty at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in 2016, according to its Department of World Languages and Cultures website. She is represented by attorneys from Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau, a New London-based firm that specializes in employment and benefit law. 2/22/25, 8:27 Former Spanish prof alleges sexual harassment, retaliatory firing in lawsuit - Yale Daily News 3/4 After two years of limited or no enrollment, at least five graduate students will be joining the Spanish and Portuguese department this fall CO., INC. 202 York Street, New Haven 06511 | (203) 432-2400 Editorial: (203) 432-2418 | [email protected] Business: (203) 432-2424 | [email protected] 2025 2/22/25, 8:27 Former Spanish prof alleges sexual harassment, retaliatory firing in lawsuit - Yale Daily News 4/4"} |
8,550 | Alvaro Ribeiro | Georgetown University | [
"8550_101.pdf",
"8550_102.pdf"
] | {"8550_101.pdf": "The Hoya \u2022 June 16, 2021 \u2022 former-provost-amid-allegations-of-sexual-misconduct/ Georgetown Revokes Honorary Degree From Former Provost Amid Allegations of Sexual Misconduct By Katie Hawkinson CW: This article discusses sexual misconduct on campus. Please refer to the end of the article for on- and off- campus resources. Georgetown University rescinded all honorifics from former Provost J. Donald Freeze, S.J., following allegations of sexual misconduct from an alumnus. On June 11, President John J. DeGioia \u201979 \u201995) sent a universitywide email regarding allegations from a former undergraduate student that Freeze forced him to engage in nonconsensual kissing and touching. In response to this news, the university has revoked all honorifics awarded to Freeze, including an honorary degree granted in 1991. Freeze worked at Georgetown from 1971 to 1991, serving as assistant dean before he was named provost in 1979. \u201cWe are grateful to the alumnus who came forward with his experiences and we condemn in the strongest possible terms any clergy abuse,\u201d DeGioia wrote in a universitywide email | Georgetown University has revoked all honorifics, including an honorary degree, from former Provost J. Donald Freeze, S.J., following allegations of sexual misconduct from a former undergraduate student. To address these allegations, DeGioia has established a working group of the board of directors, a subset of the board that will oversee the university\u2019s response. The Working Group will be led by DeGioia and staffed by three Georgetown graduates, including Thomas A. Reynolds \u201974), chair-elect of the board of directors. The working group has begun work with the East Province of the Society of Jesus, an organization that assigns Jesuits to Georgetown and other East Coast schools, to increase transparency and communication between the two organizations. DeGioia wrote that the university hopes to address sexual assault policies to better uplift survivors. \u201cWe see these steps as the continuation but not the end of our work, and we are committed to continuing to partner with the alumnus to ensure that not only University policies but also Province policies are as strong as possible in supporting survivors,\u201d DeGioia wrote. The East Province did not respond to The Hoya\u2019s request for comment in time for publication. DeGioia\u2019s email brings to light the 16th publicly known, Georgetown-affiliated priest or nun implicated in a sexual misconduct case. In 2019, The Hoya reported on 13 priests and one nun who were credibly accused of sexual abuse. The 15th, Fr. Alvaro Ribeiro, S.J., was accused of sexual harassment while teaching at Georgetown from 1992 to 2010. Previously, in February 2019, the university rescinded Cardinal Theodore McCarrick\u2019s honorary degree after he was expelled from the priesthood for sexual abuse. This decision came after The New York Times reported allegations of sexual abuse against McCarrick in June 2018. In the subsequent months, Catholic student groups on campus advocated for the university to condemn McCarrick. Degioia wrote that Georgetown has prioritized preventing sexual abuse from clergy members in recent decades. \u201cThe safety of the Georgetown community is our first priority. In the years since Father Freeze was Provost, we have implemented strong policies and procedures to provide support for sexual abuse survivors, including survivors of clergy sex abuse, and programs to safeguard our community from sexual misconduct of any kind by any member of our University,\u201d Degioia wrote. Individuals can report sexual misconduct by a Jesuit by contacting the province\u2019s victim advocate at [email protected]. Resources: On-campus resources include Health Education Services (202-687-8949) and Counseling and Psychiatric Service (202- 687-7080); additional off-campus resources include the D.C. Rape Crisis Center (202-333-7273) and the D.C. Forensic Nurse Examiner Washington Hospital Center (844-443-5732). Individuals can also report sexual misconduct by a Jesuit by contacting the province\u2019s victim advocate at [email protected]. If you or anyone you know would like to receive a sexual assault forensic examination or other medical care \u2014 including emergency contraception \u2014 call the Network for Victim Recovery of D.C. at 202-742-1727. To report sexual misconduct, you can contact Georgetown\u2019s Title coordinator at 202-687-9183 or file an online report here. Emergency contraception is available at the located at 1403 Wisconsin Ave and through H*yas for Choice. For more information, visit sexualassault.georgetown.edu.", "8550_102.pdf": "The Hoya \u2022 January 24, 2020 \u2022 Jesuit Sexually Harassed Students. Georgetown Let Him Resign. By Mason Mandell and Sana Rahman This article discusses sexual misconduct at Georgetown University. Please refer to the end of the article for on- and off-campus resources. John had known Fr. Alvaro Ribeiro, S.J., his former English professor and chaplain-in-residence in Copley Hall, for a full semester when the alleged incidents began in December 1997. What started as an uncomfortable request for a hug turned into a series of increasingly uncomfortable episodes, including offers of alcohol and pornography and Ribeiro shaking his penis in front of John, who is referred to by a pseudonym for privacy. After John reported the inappropriate behavior to Rev. William Byron, S.J., the rector, or head, of the Georgetown Jesuit Community in spring 1998, Ribeiro left campus for three semesters under a sabbatical leave of absence, despite being at least one semester short of qualifying, according to Georgetown University archives. Ribeiro returned to Georgetown in spring 2000, teaching English classes for freshmen and seniors until 2007. Ribeiro died in 2013. Ribeiro resigned from Georgetown in March 2010 after an investigation into unwanted touching of students and other inappropriate behavior, according to a university spokesperson. The investigation, overseen by Georgetown\u2019s Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity & Affirmative Action in consultation with the Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus, has not been made public until Wednesday. University President John J. DeGioia \u201979 \u201995) affirmed Georgetown\u2019s support for survivors and condemned sexual misconduct in response to The Hoya\u2019s inquiry about Ribeiro condemn in the strongest possible terms sexual misconduct in our community and am deeply sorry for the experiences of survivors,\u201d DeGioia wrote in a statement to The Hoya. \u201cAs a University, when responding to reports of sexual misconduct, we must hold ourselves to the highest standards in pursuing prompt and appropriate responses.\u201d In interviews with The Hoya, three friends and family members confirmed hearing about the misconduct from John during and after the incidents took place. Additionally, former Dean of the College Rev. Robert Lawton, S.J., who would have approved Ribeiro\u2019s sabbatical, said he heard Ribeiro had been put under restriction sometime after the alleged incident. Lawton did not specify the details of a restriction spokesperson from the Maryland Province, which oversees the university\u2019s Jesuit Community, declined to comment on the restriction mentioned by Lawton or communication between the Jesuits and the university. The Society of Jesus takes all allegations of inappropriate conduct seriously, and its ethical policies include guidelines on behavior toward people 18 years or older, according to the spokesperson. Georgetown has been affiliatied with 14 other clergy who were plausibly or credibly accused of sexual abuse, according to a March 2019 investigation by The Hoya. John\u2019s account and the incidents investigated by the are now the only publicly documented cases of clerical misconduct against Georgetown students. Ribeiro is also the first known Jesuit to engage in misconduct while serving on Georgetown\u2019s faculty was terrified really was.\u201d The harassment started at the end of John\u2019s sophomore fall, when Ribeiro saw him in their Copley floor common room and congratulated him on getting a good grade in his class. Ribeiro then asked for a hug was kind of a shy 19-year-old,\u201d John said in an interview with The Hoya. \u201cIt did feel a little uncomfortable to me, but was kind of like, \u2018Ah alright, that\u2019s cool, maybe that\u2019s just the way he shows congratulations | Fr. Alvaro Ribeiro, S.J. engaged in sexual misconduct with a student from 1997 to 1998. Georgetown let him resign in 2010. At the beginning of the spring semester, John ran into Ribeiro in a Copley elevator after doing laundry. Ribeiro began mentioning several poems and explained to John that they all had one common theme: penises few days later, Ribeiro asked John if he would help the priest return a stereo system to the Pentagon City Mall. Despite his growing discomfort from the incidents, John felt obligated to assist Ribeiro didn\u2019t know how to say no to him,\u201d John said. \u201cHe was a Jesuit, was my professor, and just kind of felt like don\u2019t want to do it, but sure. I\u2019ll help him out.\u2019\u201d At the mall, Ribeiro offered to buy John a Playboy magazine, alcohol, a suit, a sit-down dinner and to take him to a movie, all of which John declined. The inappropriate conduct culminated a few weeks later when John, after playing basketball, walked to the Yates Field House sauna and passed Ribeiro in the locker room. After John went into the sauna alone, Ribeiro entered soon after, saw John and told him to wait. Ribeiro then returned, having changed into only a towel. In the sauna, Ribeiro took off his towel and began to sway back and forth, shaking his penis in front of John. Ribeiro then asked John about his upcoming summer plans. \u201cThis is not good have to get myself out of here,\u201d John remembers thinking. When John attempted to evade the situation by saying he had to study for upcoming exams, he remembers Ribeiro telling him, \u201cHey, you should shower now\u201d \u2014 something John feared was an invitation to shower with him. Erika Summers \u201901), a friend of John\u2019s at the time, told The Hoya she remembers John mentioning a priest engaging in inappropriate conduct. John\u2019s older brother, who also knew Ribeiro, recalls his brother explaining the incidents at the sauna and the mall. Rasheen Carbin \u201998), another friend of John, recalls John in 2014 describing multiple incidents of misconduct by a priest. Reporting Ribeiro John, who is now 41 and works in marketing, was initially reluctant to report the conduct to authorities. He was convinced to report the episodes to Byron in spring 1998 by his brother and Fr. Wayne Knoll, S.J., his brother\u2019s professor who died in 2013. Byron declined to respond to a request for comment by The Hoya, explaining he could not discuss a misconduct allegation against Ribeiro because of confidentiality agreements between rectors and the Jesuit community. John was skeptical of reporting the episodes in part because he feared the consequences, but decided to come forward as a way to protect those in the future whom Ribeiro might harass. \u201c[Georgetown] was the only school had wanted to go to, and now I\u2019m a sophomore and don\u2019t know what the repercussions of me coming forward for something like this would be,\u201d John said wasn\u2019t necessarily swayed by the advances, but perhaps someone else would be \u2014 perhaps someone else could be put in a more vulnerable situation.\u201d After John reported the inappropriate episodes to Byron, Ribeiro left as his floor\u2019s chaplain-in-residence, according to John. Soon after, John remembers hearing Ribeiro would be put on leave of absence. John also remembers being told Ribeiro was undergoing treatment, although the type and purpose of treatment was never specified. There is no publicized documentation of Ribeiro\u2019s treatment. While Ribeiro became a chaplain-in-residence soon after joining the university in 1992, annual directory records show Ribeiro no longer served as chaplain-in-residence after 1999. Class schedules indicate that Ribeiro returned to teaching classes in spring 2000 after a three-semester hiatus. While university and Jesuit records state Ribeiro was on sabbatical during the semesters away, Ribeiro was short at least one semester of fulfilling the 12-semester teaching requirement for a sabbatical of one year or less, according to the 1999 faculty handbook. Departures from the requirements were not normal but could occur in exceptional circumstances, such as promising academic opportunities, according to Lawton, who was the dean of the College from 1989 to 1999. Lawton could not recall Ribeiro\u2019s 1999 sabbatical. After his three-semester leave, Ribeiro continued to teach English classes until 2007, including an advanced senior seminar during which he took a few students to London for a literary prize award ceremony Ribeiro also served as an \u201cunofficial chaplain\u201d for the university\u2019s football team, something former Georgetown football Head Coach Robert Benson recalls positively think he was first of all a friend and a mentor to everyone in the Georgetown football program, players and coaches included,\u201d Benson said in an interview with The Hoya. \u201cHe had a passion for Georgetown football that was very unique was not informed\u201d: Accountability The 2010 investigation by IDEAA, which compiled information from both the Maryland Province and Georgetown, found that Ribeiro had violated codes of conduct, according to a university spokesperson. \u201c[The investigation] found that Fr. Ribeiro had engaged in inappropriate conduct towards students, including failing to abide by professional boundaries and the unwanted touching of students\u2019 posteriors while clothed, in violation of Maryland Province and Georgetown rules,\u201d a university spokesperson wrote in an email to The Hoya. The university did not specify whether Georgetown was notified of John\u2019s allegations in 1998 or whether the university took action in response to the allegations. Lawton said he did not know of any allegations against Ribeiro during his tenure as dean. It was not until he left to become president of Loyola Marymount University in 1999 that Lawton heard Ribeiro had been placed under restriction. Penn Szittya, an English professor and former chair of the English department from 2005 to 2008, had also never heard of the allegation or any restrictions on Ribeiro, he wrote in an email to The Hoya was not informed of this history or of any restrictions related to Ribeiro\u2019s conduct, either by the Administration or by any previous Chairs,\u201d Szittya wrote. \u201cNor, as a full-time faculty member and colleague of Ribeiro\u2019s during the period you describe (1998 forward), did hear of any such restrictions spokesperson from the Maryland Province declined to comment on communication between the Maryland Province and the university. An accused priest leaving immediately after a report of sexual harassment reflects how the church and Jesuits have historically handled abuse, according to Patrick Wall, a former priest and current attorney who represents victims of clerical abuse. The Society of Jesus has strengthened its policies in the last two decades by ensuring that those who abuse minors are moved out of ministry, according to a spokesperson from the Maryland Province Jesuit is always temporarily removed from ministry during the investigation into alleged abuse of a minor, regardless of the alleged victim\u2019s current age,\u201d the spokesperson wrote in an email to The Hoya. While Jesuits have emphasized their response toward misconduct against minors, that outlook misses the gray areas of students who were just above the minor age at the time of the abuse, according to Wall. The President\u2019s Office and the Provost\u2019s Office did not respond to The Hoya\u2019s request for access to university records on Ribeiro. John has periodically thought about Ribeiro\u2019s return to campus \u2014 something that came to the surface when he visited Yates years after graduating and saw Ribeiro in the locker room saw two gentlemen being extremely friendly with each other,\u201d John said. \u201cWhen the two people turned around, it happened to be him, and what appeared to be a very young man. And wondered if he, that young man, had experienced something like had, if he felt any pressure. But felt at that point that had put the information forward and Georgetown had made the decision about what they wanted to do with him.\u201d On-campus confidential resources include Health Education Services (202-687-8949), located in Poulton Hall on the corner of 37th and streets, and Counseling and Psychiatric Services (202-687-6985), located behind Darnall Hall. Additional off-campus resources include the D.C. Rape Crisis Center (202-333-7273), the National Sexual Assault Hotline (800-656-4673), the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) (877-762-7432) and SNAP\u2019s Washington, D.C. chapter (703-801-6044). If you or anyone you know would like to receive a sexual assault forensic examination or other medical care, including emergency contraception, call the Network for Victim Recovery of D.C. (202-742-1727). To report sexual misconduct to the university, you can contact Georgetown\u2019s Title coordinator (202-687-9183) or file an online report here. For more information, visit sexualassault.georgetown.edu. If you have information to share with The Hoya regarding this investigation, contact us at [email protected] or 421 Leavey Center, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057."} |
8,783 | Luis Jaime Castillo Butters | U.S. National Academy of Sciences | [
"8783_101.pdf",
"8783_102.pdf"
] | {"8783_101.pdf": "\uf007Michael Balter \uf0178/25/2020 12:40:00 Home \uf054Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary PhD? Peru's glorious Machu Picchu WikiMedia Commons/Pedro Szekely Late last June first reported on a litany of misconduct allegations against Peruvian archaeologist Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, including sexual harassment, sleeping with students, bully, retaliation, and related behavior. Castillo is a professor of archaeology at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru (PUCP), which is currently investigating the charges in various ways. No sooner had published my report than Castillo's defenders and enablers--of which there are many, including at his power base and elsewhere--began attacking me and my reporting. More importantly, however, these dishonest attacks were also targeted at Castillo's victims, who have been portrayed as liars on social media and in the self-satisfied whisper network that Castillo's friends (and would-be friends, because he is really loyal to no one but himself) keep churning in the most cowardly way possible. They do not have the courage to distance themselves from Castillo because they owe him their careers in many cases. That led some of the survivors to write an open letter in July, pointing out that they and their bad experiences were real, and that those who would try to defend Castillo had their own very self- centered reasons for doing so. As they put it at the time: \"We came forward for multiple reasons\u2014because it is time, or because the pain you caused began to heal, or because we built an international network of support. All of us, however, are driven by our ethical responsibility to protect those who may unknowingly cross your destructive path. We fight to prevent you from further harming students and colleagues. It is time to put an end to your abuse. It is time to dismantle the architecture of impunity that has enabled and facilitated your rise to power. Enough is enough.\" Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary PhD? \uf099 \uf09a \uf0e1 Social Media The truth at last, or at le some of it, about Peter Rathjen, the of Adelaid the of Melbourne, the of Tasmania, etc. [Updat Sept 3, 2020: University Melbourne \"leader\" final speaks] Popular Posts StatCounter Search Search this site My book about Neolithic Catalhoyuk in Turkey and the origins of civilization, th paperback edition. For more informatio about it, please visit The Goddess and the Bull The Goddess and the Bull \"Lying is done with words and also with silence.\" --Adrienne Rich Quotes of the Moment 2/22/25, 8:28 Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary\u2026 1/5 Over the weeks since last wrote about Castillo, a number of colleagues have approached me with stories and examples of corruption on Castillo's part, almost all involving playing fast and loose with Peru's priceless culture and archaeology. Castillo has served as both vice-minister of culture (August 2013 to April 2015) and also minister of culture (for a brief period last year.) Although some of the allegations of corruption would require considerable investigative reporting to unravel--and must be regarded as allegations only at this time--they are no doubt best left to some enterprising Peruvian reporters rather than a North American journalist. However, one accusation did involve a U.S. institution, Yale University, and found it relatively straightforward to report on. While Castillo was still vice-minister of culture was told, he was involved in the final arrangements between Peru and Yale to inventory the artifacts and human remains from Machu Picchu that Peru had fought hard to get repatriated. This inventory was essential to settling a lawsuit Peru had filed against Yale which led to their return. Castillo was told, tried to convince Yale to give him an honorary PhD as the price for signing off on these final details fight for Peru's heritage. The citadel of Machu Picchu, 2500 meters above sea level in mountains not far from today's city of Cusco, was built in the 15th Century by the Inka. But beginning in 1526, when the Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizzarro and his men first encountered the Inka, the Empire's days were numbered. By 1572 the Inka were completely defeated by the Spanish, and Machu Picchu was left abandoned to the voracious growth of the surrounding jungle. There are a few reports of archaeologists and plunderers coming across the citadel over the centuries. But the real \"discovery\" of the site by Western archaeologists dates from 1911, when Hiram Bingham, a historian at Yale, conducted the first of three excavation campaigns at Machu Picchu, with the support of Yale and the National Geographic Society--and the authorization of the Peruvian government of the time. (See this article for a brief history of the excavations and a detailed history of the legal issues and history.) Between 1911 and 1916, Bingham shipped thousands of artifacts and human remains to Yale's Peabody Museum, including mummies and other bones, jewelry, and pottery. But beginning in 1918, the Peruvian government began demanding the return of the artifacts key issue was whether the artifacts had been loaned to Yale or if the university had taken full ownership of them, a not uncommon dispute given the kind of callous plundering of national treasures Western archaeologists and governments were inclined to carry out whenever they could get away with it (think of the Parthenon marbles and so many other examples.) The dispute lingered for decades, until 2001, when the Peruvian government made a serious attempt to convince both Yale and the to return the artifacts. Yale resisted for a number of additional years, but did reach a tentative agreement with Peru in 2007; when that fell through, Peru filed suit against Yale, in 2008. After a series of legal maneuvers over the next two years, the two sides reached an agreement in November 2010, with the help of the U.S. Senator from Connecticut, Christopher Dodd. The agreement required that an inventory be carried out, but that Yale would return everything to Peru. And in 2011, Yale and Peru agreed to partner up to create a museum and research center in Cusco devoted to the study of Machu Picchu and the Inca culture. Vice-Minister of Culture Luis Jaime Castillo Butters asks for a piece of the action. In November 2012, the last of the artifacts taken from Machu Picchu by Bingham were flown to Cusco, including some 35,000 pottery fragments. This third and final batch of artifacts, packed into 127 boxes, completed the repatriation. But there was still more to do. For one thing, according to sources familiar with the details, the Ministry of Culture had to sign off on the full return of the artifacts, so that the Foreign Affairs Ministry could in turn notify the U.S. District judge in the case that the agreement between the parties had been fully met. Only then would the judge ratify the settlement and end the case. But before the Ministry of Culture would sign off, sources say, Yale had to negotiate with the ministry about a number of details concerning the collection--including finalizing the inventories of artifacts and also whether or not certain faunal (animal) specimens should be included. These discussions, which stretched into 2013, involved on Yale's side Richard Burger, the university's leading Machu Picchu expert; and on the Peruvian side, then vice- minister for culture, Luis Jaime Castillo Butters. \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Michael Balter View my complete profile About Me Enter your email address: Subscribe Delivered by FeedBurner Subscribe via email 2/22/25, 8:28 Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary\u2026 2/5 While the negotiations over these issues were going on--they reportedly dragged over a number of months--Burger began to tell friends and colleagues that Castillo was asking Yale to give him a honorary PhD am told that Burger took this request very seriously at the time, and also that Castillo was actively in search of such degrees, even though he had received his real PhD from in 2012. \"He had been looking for honorary degrees for a long time,\" says one Peruvian official. Although Burger declines to discuss many details of the episode on the record, he did confirm to me that Castillo had made the request, although he now says that he did not take it seriously--despite what he told colleagues back in 2013 did not think of Castillo's remark about an honorary degree as a serious request,\" Burger told me last month, \"nor did treat it seriously. This is not something that Yale would have considered. It was not pursued have seen no evidence that Yale did consider it seriously. But given what Burger told his colleagues, it seems quite likely that Castillo did mean it seriously. But even if he really was joking, some archaeologists say, that does not make it any better. \"As Vice-Minister of Culture of Peru, Luis Jaime Castillo Butters should comport himself like an honorable representative of his country and serious protector of Peru's cultural patrimony,\" one archaeologist who works in Peru commented. \"Even a 'joke' can be construed as a mafia-like request for favors. But given [Castillo's] reputation as a bully and one who does quid pro quo to cement his power, this was certainly not a joke The truth at last, or at least some of it, about Peter Rathjen, the of Adelaide, the of Melbourne, the of Tasmania, etc. [Updated Sept 3, 2020: University of Melbourne \"leader\" finally speaks Can science stop sexual harassment in higher education review of the latest contribution from Kate Clancy and her colleagues Posted by Michael Balter have been a working journalist for more than 40 years, beginning in Los Angeles as an investigative reporter and then in Paris as a travel, food, and science writer. For more than 20 years have covered anthropology and archaeology writer for Science, Audubon, Scientific American, SAPIENS, and other publications have also covered sexual misconduct for The Verge, Scientific American, and others write about mental health, especially schizophrenia; and engage in occasional media criticism returned to the in October 2017 after 30 years in Paris, and now live in the New York City area, where currently teach journalism at City College of New York previously taught journalism at Boston University and New York University.) For more about me and what do, copies of my articles, information about my book, and other goodies, please visit You may like these posts 2/22/25, 8:28 Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary\u2026 3/5 9 Comments Anonymous said\u2026 *Shakes head* Luis Jaime Castillo Butters doesn\u2019t just pimp out students, he also tries to pimp out Peru\u2019s cultural heritage for his benefit. May he never rise to power again. August 25, 2020 at 2:53 Michael Balter said accidentally deleted the following Anonymous comment: \"You are told\" that Burger took the request seriously at that time but when you asked him directly he told you that he took it as a joke.... And said \"joke\" didn't affect the negotiations... So Castillo made a joke... Maybe you should keep focusing on the harassment issue new semester is starting at La Catolica, is he going to teach again? Is any other abuser is teaching? My response: The fact that Burger told colleagues at the time that Castillo was seriously trying to get Yale to give him an honorary PhD is fully relevant to evaluating the question of Castillo\u2019s intent. There is no conflict between reporting on his alleged corruption and the harassment issues, all go to the overriding issue of his abuse of power. August 26, 2020 at 10:33 Anonymous said\u2026 How do you know Castillo did not affect the negotiations? It seems highly suspect that the paperwork dragged on for months. Sounds like Trump with Ukraine. You can\u2019t argue there was no corruption just because it wasn\u2019t ultimately successful. Sexual harassment is a manifestation of abuse of power, so it\u2019s absolutely relevant to the overall picture of Castillo\u2019s personality. August 26, 2020 at 8:11 Anonymous said\u2026 Donate for Michael Balter's Go Fund Me: Freedom of the Press Defense Fund Kurin v. Balter Michael has been sued for $10 million for reporting the truth against an academic's serious misconduct - retaliating against students who reported sexual assault from her husband. So far, nearly $8,500 has been raised of $20,000 goal. Please support Michael and help to keep integrity in academia. If your family and friends were treated that way, you would not want to stay quiet, would you? You are probably aware that Kurin was trying to defend other bullies and harassers, including Peter Rathjen who has been found by an Independent Commissioner Against Corruption to be guilty of misconduct. Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Castillo, ejected from U.S. National Academy of Sciences for sexual harassment, sues Academy and its president for millions of dollars [Updated June 4, 2023: Judge grants defendants's motion for dismissal] Bones claimed by disgraced Santa Barbara anthropologist Danielle Kurin to be those of a missing teenager turn out to be not human, but animal, most likely from a cow. Was a fraud perpetrated on a grieving mother and a traumatized community? [Updated Sept 22, 2022 real forensic anthropologist weighs in] Why did a leading #MeToo reporter subpoena a leading #MeToo advocate? [Updated June 22] Post a Comment 2/22/25, 8:28 Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary\u2026 4/5 Copyright \u00a9 2025 Balter's Blog The report has made reference to Balter's blog, which was critical in initiating the investigation. This confirms Balter's integrity as a journalist. Balter is taking a lot of risk to make the world a better place for you, your children and future generation. Please donate to Balter's movement. August 26, 2020 at 11:58 Anonymous said\u2026 There is something more serious about the management that Luis Jaime Castillo did when he was vice minister, and that is that taking advantage of his position and that has a drone company, he sold these equipment to the cultural directorates of Cusco, Ayacucho, Trujillo and Lambayeque, where had and still has his corrupt partners who facilitate all these bad deeds in exchange for favors of all kinds. These actions must be registered in the purchases of the time that he was vice minister. This type is the worst that exists in Peruvian Archeology and unfortunately it has already dirtied all the good image of archeology. They must investigate him for all his crimes and go to jail. Richard Burger is afraid of retaliation, Castillo is a specialist in influence peddling August 30, 2020 at 8:41 Michael Balter said\u2026 Re the last comment: As said in the post above have heard so many allegations of corruption on Castillo\u2019s part, and they seem to be common knowledge don\u2019t know the Peruvian news media, but do they have the guts and the independence to investigate these things know there have been some reports but they have not really delved deeply into Castillo\u2019s role. Anyone with any ideas, please post them here as a comment. August 30, 2020 at 9:00 Anonymous said\u2026 There is a website called Lima Gris ( and another Mano Alzada ( who must take up this case of corruption of drones. The worst of all is that these equipment, for example in Cusco, are deposited in a damp and dark room, in frank deterioration, the same happens in the other places mentioned, because Castillo is the only one that offers the complete service (training, management and maintenance) of the drones, that is, he did his business thinking about the future. Maybe they will make the complaint, but in Peru everything is corruption and Castillo is part of that corrupt network that is the Ministry of Culture, and just like in the PUCP, it will not happen to him and then everything will be an anecdote, and he will continue to commit crimes of all kind. Castillo is powerful in influences, but he is a decadent intellectual, he means almost nothing at that level and he knows it, but he accepts himself! August 31, 2020 at 12:13 Anonymous said\u2026 Castillo's favorite book: The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene. It was required reading in one of his courses. Castillo taught his students to follow those laws without questioning its morality. October 9, 2020 at 4:12 Anonymous said looked up the book the above commenter mentioned. This explains a lot of Castillo\u2019s methods. Everyone should read this summary to guard against these manipulative and dishonest people: Remember that Machiavelli himself ended up penniless and powerless. December 25, 2020 at 2:42 Post a Comment 2/22/25, 8:28 Did Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters try to shake down Yale University for an honorary\u2026 5/5", "8783_102.pdf": "\uf007Michael Balter \uf0173/11/2022 11:05:00 Home \uf054Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and that of his university to retaliate against those who told the truth about him. An update on a grotesque #MeToo story. [Update: Court hearing is April 8] ][Updated April 4: Inst Andean Studies issues strong statement of support]] The man pictured above, Luis Jaime Castillo Butters--former culture minister of Peru and current archaeology professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru (PUCP) in Lima--has twice been found by key institutions with which he was affiliated to have committed sexual harassment of students. First, his own university upheld the allegations (which first reported in June 2020), when PUCP's sexual harassment commission examined the evidence and found it to be highly credible. On that occasion, however, Castillo could not be disciplined or fired because the relevant anti- harassment policies were not in effect at the time he committed the abuses. Then, last October, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in which Castillo had been an international member, ousted him from the organization after its own investigation found him to have committed misconduct. During these events, Castillo has repeatedly threatened survivors of his abuse and other witnesses with defamation lawsuits, including this reporter (as of yet, he has taken no action against me, despite threats from his attorney that he would do so.) However, Castillo, with the enabling and support of the PUCP, has begun to follow through on the threats. He has now sued a truth-teller, Lima-based anthropologist Marcela Poirier, for Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and that of his university to retaliate against those who told the truth about him. An update on a grotesque #MeToo story. [Update: Court hearing is April 8] ][Updated April 4: Inst Andean Studies issues strong statement of support]] \uf099 \uf09a \uf0e1 Social Media The truth at last, or at le some of it, about Peter Rathjen, the of Adelaid the of Melbourne, the of Tasmania, etc. [Updat Sept 3, 2020: University Melbourne \"leader\" final speaks] Popular Posts StatCounter Search Search this site My book about Neolithic Catalhoyuk in Turkey and the origins of civilization, th paperback edition. For more informatio about it, please visit The Goddess and the Bull The Goddess and the Bull \"Lying is done with words and also with silence.\" --Adrienne Rich Quotes of the Moment 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 1/11 defamation. Castillo is asking the court to award him 200,000 Peruvian soles (about $50,000 U.S.) and to jail her for 30 months. In her report on the action by the NAS, Science reporter Meredith Wadman described Poirier's role: \"Marcela Poirier, an anthropologist with a Ph.D. from Purdue University who worked for 1 year at a field school that Castillo Butters frequently visited, filed a complaint with in the spring that included the commission\u2019s report and asked the academy to oust Castillo Butters. Now a manager of cultural and educational resources in Lima, she told ScienceInsider today that NAS\u2019s move 'sends the message that change is possible, and that justice\u2014however imperfect\u2014can be achieved.'\" (Note: Marcela Poirier was not one of my informants and was not one of the survivors wrote about in my blog.) As if that were not bad enough, Castillo's university, the PUCP, is threatening students who disseminated allegations on social media against Castillo and another professor accused of misconduct, Daniel Parodi, with suspension. (For Peruvian press reports, in Spanish, see here and here; and this Twitter thread which provides some visual details of the campaign against misconduct by faculty.) And as if that were not bad enough, Peruvian police attacked students who were demonstrating outside the university, demanding that it take action (click link to see video.) According to the Peruvian press reports, the complaints against Castillo and Parodi were shared on social media by student organizations, including the Federation of Students of the and the Federated Center of Letters. The site Wayka.pe quoted 19 year old Adriana Verastegui, Gender Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Federated Center for General Studies: \"We thought it important to alert other students about the public complaints against these professors.\" In retaliation, Castillo and Parodi reported her and others to officials for \"defamation.\" Scarlett Huanis, another student denounced by both Castillo and Parodi, said: \"It is not the first time that we have been forced to publicly demand more concrete actions from the university on issues of bullying and sexual harassment of female [students and teachers.] \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 \uf054 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Michael Balter View my complete profile About Me Enter your email address: Subscribe Delivered by FeedBurner Subscribe via email 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 2/11 La Republica/ Lucia Castro have not personally investigated the allegations against Parodi, so will not say more about him here. But my reporting has found convincing evidence of significant misconduct, including harassment, bullying, and sleeping with students, against Castillo. After my first report, cited above, some of Castillo's supporters, along with a crew of sycophants who owed their careers to Peru's most powerful archaeologist, began attacking the survivors who had come forward as well as myself. The survivors bravely issued a letter defending their allegations, and have written myself about the lies that Castillo's supporters have spread about them and my reporting. In response to all of these allegations, and even to the NAS's decision to eject Castillo from its ranks- -the first time the Academy has ever expelled an international member--the has done absolutely nothing to protect students from his abuses. Thus Castillo continues to teach his classes at PUCP. (Castillo is still teaching; late word is that Parodi has now been removed from his classes) The university gave the Peruvian publication La Republica its supposed reasons for not acting against Castillo: \"Por otro lado, en cuanto a las investigaci\u00f3n que se realiz\u00f3 hacia los docentes denunciados en redes sociales, Ana Neyra se\u00f1al\u00f3 que las anteriores comisiones de investigaci\u00f3n de la n o pudieron encontrar ninguna prueba probatoria para sancionar al docente Luis Castillo, a pesar de que se cuenta con una investigaci\u00f3n period\u00edstica y cinco testimonios de por medio en su contra.\" Google translation: 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 3/11 \"On the other hand, regarding the investigation that was carried out towards the teachers denounced in social networks, Ana Neyra [the PUCP's secretary of instruction] pointed out that the previous investigation commissions of the could not find any probative evidence to sanction the teacher Luis Castillo, despite the fact that he has a journalistic investigation and five testimonies against him.\" (Note that this is not correct. The evidence against Castillo was indeed probative, according to the sexual harassment commission, but he got off essentially on a technicality.) In addition, Castillo, who has long had an affiliation with Harvard, first formal and now informal, has recently been showing up at Zoom talks about Andean archaeology featuring Harvard professors, according to witnesses. His presence has reportedly caused a great deal of discomfort among many in the virtual audience. What is to be done? With a few notable exceptions, including of course the brave survivors of Castillo's abuses and truth- tellers like Marcela Poirier, the archaeology community has been pretty silent about all of these attacks on colleagues in Peru fighting against sexual misconduct and bullying. As have reported, some archaeologists, including some based in the U.S., apparently not wanting to get on the wrong side of Peru's most powerful archaeologist, have actually either defended him directly or attacked his accusers. It's time for that to stop and for things to change course think it is entirely reasonable to insist that the archaeology community (and the broader scientific community) come to the defense of those who are under attack by abusers, to raise their voices (and not just anonymously on this blog, sorry to say), and make their intentions clear. In my view, Castillo must be completely isolated from the archaeology community, all collaborations with him must cease, and the should be directly called out for its enabling of him by refusing to take any action. Perhaps the comments section of this blog can serve as a forum for discussion of what can be done, as well as updates on what is being done (as has been the case on some of these blog posts, to good effect.) \"Enough with intimidation\" Update March 18: The hearing in Castillo's case against Marcela Poirier will be held online on the morning of April 8 am one of the witnesses for Marcela; Castillo has also mustered a long list of apparent \"character\" witnesses. Please watch here for regular updates, and please do what you can- -either as individuals or organizations--to come to Marcela's support. 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 4/11 38 Comments Anonymous said\u2026 Update April 2: Please see comments below for the text of an urgent plea sent to the leadership of the Society for American Archaeology and which has gone unanswered for more than two weeks. Update April 4: The Institute for Andean Studies, the professional organization most closely associated with Castillo's area of study, issues a strong statement of support. This is the way the step up Support builds for Peruvian anthropologist Marcela Poirier, target of vicious retaliation by a powerful sexual harasser [Update April 4: Institute of Andean Studies issues strong statement of support Paleontology's #MeToo enablers Posted by Michael Balter have been a working journalist for more than 40 years, beginning in Los Angeles as an investigative reporter and then in Paris as a travel, food, and science writer. For more than 20 years have covered anthropology and archaeology writer for Science, Audubon, Scientific American, SAPIENS, and other publications have also covered sexual misconduct for The Verge, Scientific American, and others write about mental health, especially schizophrenia; and engage in occasional media criticism returned to the in October 2017 after 30 years in Paris, and now live in the New York City area, where currently teach journalism at City College of New York previously taught journalism at Boston University and New York University.) For more about me and what do, copies of my articles, information about my book, and other goodies, please visit You may like these posts Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Castillo, ejected from U.S. National Academy of Sciences for sexual harassment, sues Academy and its president for millions of dollars [Updated June 4, 2023: Judge grants defendants's motion for dismissal] Bones claimed by disgraced Santa Barbara anthropologist Danielle Kurin to be those of a missing teenager turn out to be not human, but animal, most likely from a cow. Was a fraud perpetrated on a grieving mother and a traumatized community? [Updated Sept 22, 2022 real forensic anthropologist weighs in] Why did a leading #MeToo reporter subpoena a leading #MeToo advocate? [Updated June 22] Post a Comment 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 5/11 You\u2019d think that now after the Comaroff widely-publicized backlash, LJC\u2019s sycophants would be less eager to jump to his aid as before. Enabling faculty are starting to realize that there are severe personal consequences for not doing their homework. March 12, 2022 at 9:47 Anonymous said\u2026 You\u2019d think so, but except for the retired ones (2) all the rest have been, and continue to be quite comfortable with the whole issue. Two years and not a single word of condemnation. March 15, 2022 at 11:56 Anonymous said\u2026 If senior faculty cannot muster up the courage to deal with someone like Castillo, and if those same faculty are advising their students to be just as cowardly, how can anyone expect that he would not go from one abuse to another as he did? This was from a comment referring Kurin, but it certainly applies to Castillo and his enablers too. March 16, 2022 at 1:28 Anonymous said\u2026 Word around the archaeological community is that his enablers are still vigorously advocating for him. He's the gatekeeper for the tight inside group of Andeanists that control that field but also sit on hiring, tenure promotion, granting committees etc. in general around the country. We already know who all these people are as they are continually discussed in this blog with regard to connected cases with Urton, Kurin, Boytner etc. One call from anyone in this network can insure that a qualified candidate isn't hired for example no matter what field they are in. That's why colleagues in general are silent. Its time for a new generation of Peruvian archaeologists to start outing this cabal even if it means closing Peru to investigators conducting fieldwork there for a period of time. You begin by using the authority of the committees over which you do have control. It has worked in the past in other countries globally. It was extraordinarily successful in Mexico in the early 1980's for example. This is the only way to get rid of network stooges like Castillo. On networks in anthropology. March 18, 2022 at 9:49 Anonymous said think Castillo\u2019s enablers have to come to light in order for public pressure to do its work. We know his main enablers at Harvard: Urton and Quilter. We still need to know who else in the is enabling him. But let\u2019s start with the Peruvian enablers (they are so many) These are the who presented letters of support for Castillo during the 2020 process: Elsa Tomasto faculty) Julio Saldana \u2013 in charge of the lab) (Castillo\u2019s former student) Ema Perea (Museo Nacional de Arqueologia Antropologia e Historia) (Castillo\u2019s former student) Fernando Zvietcovich Maria Herrera Lopez Andre Servan Rochabrunt March 18, 2022 at 1:05 Anonymous said\u2026 Most people seem to be under the impression that Jeffrey Quilter is operating as the front man since so many of the other colleagues have been directly connected with all of the scandals discussed on this blog. What's really at stake is the future of archaeology in Peru. March 19, 2022 at 12:55 Michael Balter said\u2026 Re the last two comments: It seems clear that many are afraid to go against Castillo because they fear he can block their work in Peru. That\u2019s true of Peruvians, Americans, and anyone else who works there or wants to. So the ticket of entry to work on Peruvian archaeological sites is looking the other way while Castillo pursues an anthropologist who reported him to the NAS, which then investigated and found the allegations to be credible and substantiated. While she is possibly in jail, that critical archaeology work will go on and others will pursue their careers. Are archaeologists moral and principled researchers, or cowards who value their careers over justice, fairness, and the right of young women to have careers in the field? That is what is at issue here and what will be tested in the coming weeks. Fortunately, some are doing the right thing, but right now, most are not. Sad. March 20, 2022 at 5:36 Michael Balter said\u2026 And just a hint, some may find themselves on the wrong side of this faster than they think. There is a lot going on and there are some very determined colleagues who know how to stick up for someone who is in trouble. March 20, 2022 at 5:45 Anonymous said\u2026 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 6/11 whatever is going on here, the notion that Castillo can block people's work in Peru is simply not the case. Even the most cursory investigation will reveal many people with no or poor relationships with Castillo, both Peruvian and foreign, working with permits granted by the Ministry of Culture. Perhaps there is more to the story than that March 20, 2022 at 7:27 Anonymous said\u2026 Well, actually Castillo blocked Steve Bourget from continuing his work on Moche on the north coast of Peru. Bourget did not get along with Castillo. Bourget never conducted fieldwork in Peru again. So there\u2019s that. But beyond this case, the thing is that Castillo was Vice Minister of Culture of Peru during 2013-2018 and Minister of Culture in 2019. The problem is not that he blocked everyone he didn\u2019t like, but that he had the power to do so, and in some cases he actually did. Further, he gave many key positions to his people, many of whom still work in the Ministerio, because of him. And let\u2019s remind we are not just talking about a powerful professor here, we are talking about someone who got to the highest power position in a country wonder how many personal favors Castillo asked for him and his people, as a government official, which is totally corrupt. March 21, 2022 at 3:22 Anonymous said\u2026 Not sure it matters, but Castillo's time as Vice Minister ended in 2015, not 2018 and he was Minister for only 3 months in 2019. Didnt see many holdovers when doing permit applications this year but perhaps there are still some. And understand that Bourget was banned for repeated permit violations but maybe someone has more info-mine is third hand March 21, 2022 at 7:06 Anonymous said\u2026 Bourget was essentially Chris Donnan's protege so wouldn't be surprised to learn there are politics behind the Bourget situation. My understanding from hearsay around and earlier posts on this blog was that Stanish engineered getting Castillo into UCLA. However Donnan declined to work with him and given his temper with regard to those who Castillo feels have slighted him wouldn't be surprised if he took it out on Bourget. But don't know the background on Bourget's projects either. March 22, 2022 at 8:58 Michael Balter said\u2026 Where is Steve Bourget now? He does not appear to be at Austin anymore. If someone here knows him, perhaps they can call his attention to these comments and ask him to weigh in. March 22, 2022 at 9:04 Anonymous said\u2026 Last known whereabouts at Geneva. Major publication in 2016. Maybe he has retired? March 22, 2022 at 9:48 Anonymous said\u2026 Bourget retired from some museum in Geneva a few years ago...seems to have dropped off the map. Castillo started at and finished course work before Stanish got there assume he was Donnan's student because who else could he have been working with but that was a long time ago- around 1990 if memory serves. March 22, 2022 at 12:56 Anonymous said\u2026 To \u201cAnonymous said\u2026March 22, 2022 at 12:56 PM\u201d \u201cCastillo started at and finished course work before Stanish got there assume he was Donnan's student because who else could he have been working with but that was a long time ago- around 1990 if memory serves.\u201d See more details here (search \u201cStanish\u201d) March 22, 2022 at 2:27 Anonymous said\u2026 Castillo received his Ph.D. in 2012. Stanish and Nair were the Andeanists on the committee. March 22, 2022 at 9:16 Anonymous said\u2026 Now that we\u2019re in the middle of the SAA\u2019s meetings and that Sandweiss is going to be the new President wonder which will be his position as an Andean archaeologist regarding Castillo mean he should be expelled from the SAA. April 2, 2022 at 8:16 Michael Balter said\u2026 I'm not sure Castillo is still a member of SAA. Perhaps someone should check the member directory. So here is what's happening wrote a plea to the board and staff asking that support Marcela 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 7/11 Poirier heard nothing for more than a week wrote again. Deb Nichols accidentally copied me on an email the whole group, saying that was making \"demands\" on SAA. Below is what actually wrote to them have been using the meeting hashtag to try to bring this to the attention of the meeting attendees in Chicago hope the will not turn out to be a morally bankrupt organization hope it has learned its lessons since the Yesner affair of 2019 (some people are still lying about what happened then.) Please make sure everyone sees this. Sent March 18, still no response from anyone in SAA: Dear colleagues, This is an urgent appeal to members of the board of the SAA, and some past presidents was not able to find email addresses for a few current board members, so would be grateful if someone could share this with them. As you probably know, Peruvian archaeologist and former culture minister Luis Jaime Castillo Butters was ejected from the National Academy of Sciences last October, after an investigation upheld allegations of sexual harassment against him. This was the second institution to find the charges credible; earlier the sexual harassment commission of the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Castillo's home institution, came to similar conclusions, although for \"technical reasons\" the university has not seen fit to discipline him. One of the researchers who reported Castillo to the was Marcela Poirier, a Peruvian anthropologist. Marcela's role is briefly outlined in this news story in Science about the Academy's action: academy-sciences Castillo is now suing Marcela for defamation in the Peruvian courts, asking about $50K in damages and also that she be jailed for 30 months. Despite her evident courage, she is very scared about what might happen. The hearing of the case will be held the morning of April 8 using the Google online platform. Marcela has three witnesses who will appear on April 8, including me; Castillo has 15, all of whom appear to be \"character\" witnesses am a witness because my reporting on Castillo's misconduct was instrumental, as all involved agree, in the two institutions deciding to launch investigations--as the Science story makes clear number of colleagues who might have been witnesses for Marcela have declined to appear out of fear of Castillo's power over who gets to work in Peru. Thus the intimidation process is already well established.) This lawsuit is a blatant attempt by a powerful archaeologist to intimidate Marcela and all other survivors into silence, past, present, and future. It is also direct retaliation against Marcela for her whistleblowing to the believe that these actions, and Castillo's conduct, are in direct violation of the SAA's anti-harassment guidelines. Thus urge you to do anything you can to support Marcela, for example by issuing a statement condemning this retaliation, or in other ways encouraging the anthropology/archaeology communities to speak out both formally and informally hope that as colleagues of Marcela's and believers that women in anthropology should be able to pursue their careers without fear of harassment, you will lend your support don't need to tell you that if Castillo succeeds in this action, it will be a clear signal to survivors of abuse and their supporters that they are better off keeping silent. If you have any questions or want to see my reporting on Castillo in detail, please let me know. With thanks and best regards, Michael Balter April 2, 2022 at 8:29 Michael Balter said\u2026 PS--As you can see from what wrote the leadership made no \"demands\" on them. The demands Deb and the others are sensing are those coming from their own bad consciences. Thus does the world turn. Pathetic that this is what \"academia\" has become. April 2, 2022 at 8:56 Anonymous said\u2026 Btw, Hundreds of Peruvians, including important Feminist Organizations and Institutions have signed a public statement in support of Marcela. April 2, 2022 at 10:08 Michael Balter said\u2026 Yes, the Peruvians are being very brave in going up against one of the most powerful academics in the country, and a former culture minister. It would be good to see that kind of bravery among 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 8/11 American academics. Pardon my bitterness. The American Anthropological Association has also refused to do anything to support Marcela will be publishing that exchange, with an analysis, later on. April 2, 2022 at 10:15 Anonymous said would have thought better of Deborah Nichols. April 3, 2022 at 8:52 Anonymous said\u2026 Some of the comments here have strayed rather far from the original and sustained accusations. They have moved to the ad hominem and are not always fully informed. 1. Deb now should receive our concern, our support, our care, and if you are so inclined, our love and prayers hope those who disparage her here are simply unaware rather than hateful. 2. Castillo Butters, Poirier, and Balter are not members of the SAAs. If you want to change something, join. 3. The charter focuses on archaeology and its practice. Where the original charges applied to that focus, the SAAs took and will take action. But this law suit has moved beyond that realm into a dispute between private individuals who are not members about issues that derive from, but are now well beyond, archeological practice. 4. There is real and valid concern that the effect of a statement, if one were issued, would be the opposite of that desired. Such an attempt to help Dra. Poitier might hurt her in unintended ways. 5. Dan Sandweiss is not President of the SAAs. He is President Elect and as such is prohibited to speak for the society. It is unreasonable to think he would. To sum up hope comments will cease hurtful ad hominem attacks against people who do not deserve them. Effective action is not always loud and loud words are not always effective. April 4, 2022 at 12:32 Michael Balter said\u2026 In response to the previous comment, which do not agree with--smacks of a wordy and somewhat bureaucratic attempt to avoid taking any responsibility for what happens to a colleague threatened with jail--the Institute of Andean Archaeology has taken a very different approach: april-2022 think this is the way that institutions and organizations should respond to situations where moral issues are involved, in keeping with the responsibilities of archaeologists and anthropologists to be engaged with what goes on their fields, positive and negative. We make rules which restrict our agency, and then we pretend to be bound by them. This is morally bankrupt when questions of justice are involved. April 4, 2022 at 12:37 Michael Balter said\u2026 Sorry, the Institute of Andean Studies. April 4, 2022 at 12:38 Michael Balter said\u2026 While am here would not have asked the to issue a statement concerning the Marcela Poirier case if did not have good reason to believe that such an action would be helpful to Marcela and welcome by her. Please stop the dishonesty and gaslighting, it's disgusting and not worthy of serious academics. April 4, 2022 at 12:49 Anonymous said\u2026 Michael, not everyone who disagrees with your tactics is \"disgusting,\" \"dishonest,\" or \"gaslighting.\" It is wrong for any journalist to engage in such ad hominem attacks support Dra. Poirier and absolutely reject what Castillo Butters has done and is now doing. The SAAs and AAAs already have strong statements about harassment and assault, and others are following suit. More importantly, they take action, including in the root causes underlying this case. But they do not have and in my opinion never should have ethical statements concerning legal cases between private non-members that do not concern anthropology. This is a defamation case, and hope it fails. But it is no longer about archaeology. If this were a felony case about assault on a project or a civil case about harassment, It would be appropriate for both organizations to get involved, and hope to hell they would. But please, if you wish to be taken seriously, you need to stop attacking people who share your moral indignation but not your tactics. You are not only preaching to the choir, you are attacking it. April 4, 2022 at 1:16 Michael Balter said\u2026 I'm going to leave it mostly to others to discuss this, but a criticism of inaction by is not \"ad hominen,\" by definition, because it goes directly to the disagreement about tactics, which is legitimate, relevant, and to the point. If the tactics follow from moral cowardice, which think they do, that is not my doing nor my responsibility. In fact in this case the has so far decided not to adopt any \"tactics\" at all, but to use controversies about me as an excuse for doing nothing. That has been going on for years now. 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 9/11 April 4, 2022 at 1:23 Michael Balter said am far, far from the only one who has had issues with the SAA's historical failure to do the right thing in harassment/abuse cases, as think most reading this will know. April 4, 2022 at 1:29 Anonymous said\u2026 So, the SAA\u2019s had Castillo in their as an international liaison for Latin America in 2018? Not just Peru, but Latin America. Sure, public accusations came out in 2020, but the accusations against him regarding serial sexual harassment happened in 2014 and before. While this was happening, he was part of SAA\u2019s ethics task force. archive/valuingarch_report.pdf?sfvrsn=4cb34c44_4 Castillo is even part of the 2020 ethics report! (start at page 27) archive/valuingarch_report.pdf?sfvrsn=4cb34c44_4 April 4, 2022 at 11:35 Anonymous said\u2026 On April 4, 2022 at 12:32 PM, Anonymous said: \u201c1. Deb now should receive our concern, our support, our care, and if you are so inclined, our love and prayers\u201d But by your very own logic, we should not. By your very own logic, this is really a medical issue between a private individual and her endometrial cancer. This too, has nothing to do with archaeology and its practice. By your very own logic, it was inappropriate for the leadership to even bring it up in the opening session, and plead the members to solemnly reflect on Deb\u2019s situation. Anonymous also said: \u201c2. Castillo Butters, Poirier, and Balter are not members of the SAAs. If you want to change something, join.\u201d And this is exactly why you are not gaining support in our ranks, Balter. The is full of entitled people like Anonymous who believe that supporting a colleague in need should be restricted to those who pay a membership fee (assuming they can afford to), even if they further acknowledge that a terrible wrong is unfolding in front of our eyes. People who argue against \u201cad hominem\u201d attacks, and then follow to shoot the messenger of the survivors. April 5, 2022 at 3:14 Michael Balter said\u2026 Re the last comment agree with the commenter\u2019s point that the failure so far by the to support Marcela is hypocritical. But this is a failure of the leadership, which as far as know has not presented the possibility of supporting her to the membership nor even made the membership aware of this case. The leadership has not responded at all to my pleas, other than Deb\u2019s statement to them that am making \u201cdemands\u201d (she is dealing with the situation despite her unfortunate illness, with which sympathize of course.) Also, it is not \u201cBalter\u201d who is not gaining support, it is Marcela. Going back to the Yesner affair and earlier, a lot of falsehoods have been spread about me and my reporting, which unfortunately a lot of gullible, uninformed individuals have tended to believe. It\u2019s been very convenient to use criticisms of my \u201ctactics\u201d as an excuse to ignore the plight of the many survivors whose stories have helped to tell. Now we are seeing this with the serious attacks on Marcela Poirier\u2014oh, this is Balter\u2019s thing, so we are justified in doing nothing. It\u2019s not me who is threatened with 30 months in jail, it is Marcela. The court hearing is this Friday. The Institute of Andean Studies, the organization that brings together researchers in Castillo\u2019s own field, has spoken clearly. So should the SAA. There is still time. April 5, 2022 at 5:48 Anonymous said\u2026 Peruvian press coverage of the case: que-lo-denuncio-por-hostigamiento-sexual/ April 7, 2022 at 8:43 Anonymous said\u2026 According to Peruvian sources, irregularities at the court hearings have raised concerns: que-lo-denuncio-por-hostigamiento-sexual/ 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 10/11 Copyright \u00a9 2025 Balter's Blog Does anybody know more about this matter? April 18, 2022 at 1:51 Anonymous said\u2026 The Comisi\u00f3n Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDDHH), a coalition of human rights organizations in Peru, has indeed raised their concerns regarding in particular the judge's decision for the hearings to remain private : few days ago, on April 28th, the Observatory for the protection of human rights defenders, a joint program by the International Federation for Human Rights and the (SOS-Torture Network) published an urgent appeal for actions on behalf of Marcela Poirier defensora-de-los-derechos-de-las-mujeres contra-la-defensora-de-derechos-de-la-mujer-marcela-poirier April 30, 2022 at 1:25 Anonymous said\u2026 Peruvian media coverage of the case this is national scandal in Peru: de-prision/ June 3, 2022 at 10:54 Anonymous said\u2026 Science coverage of the case: harassment-case June 3, 2022 at 10:55 Post a Comment 2/22/25, 8:28 Twice confirmed sexual harasser Luis Jaime Castillo Butters, archaeologist and former culture minister of Peru, uses his power and\u2026 11/11"} |
8,621 | Leslie Beitsch | Florida State University | [
"8621_101.pdf",
"8621_102.pdf",
"8621_103.pdf"
] | {"8621_101.pdf": "January 10, 2022 Laurel Fulkerson, Ph Interim Vice President for Research Florida State University 3012 Westcott North Tallahassee, Florida 3230 [email protected] Dear Dr. Fulkerson am writing to follow-up on the most recent communication of May 13, 2021, followed by a teleconference on June 8, 2021, between and the Florida State University (\u201cUniversity\u201d) regarding Dr. David Gilbert. When we last communicated, we concurred with your plan to relinquish R01 HG010658 and R01 GM083337, with Dr. Gilbert as Principal Investigator (PI), monitoring by the Department Chair during the time Dr. Gilbert remained employed at the University, and assurance of no recurrent problems. Based on this discussion, we were under the impression that this issue was resolved, and appropriate sanctions were applied by the University. However, further information on the allegations involving Dr. Gilbert were raised to our attention in the recently published (November 16, 2021) article entitled determines 3 professors guilty of sexual misconduct\u201d (\u201cnews article\u201d). The article raises concerns about the severity of Dr. Gilbert\u2019s violations, compared to what the University previously reported to NIH. Relatedly, it raised concerns about whether or not the 10-day leave was adequate for (re)training. In addition, there are inconsistencies in the University\u2019s report and the media report on the date of his resignation from the University. This causes us to question the seriousness of the allegations and University oversight in several other recent cases of harassment reported to NIH. Specifically, in the May 13, 2021 letter to and during the June 8, 2021 teleconference, it was noted that the University reprimanded Dr. Gilbert in April 2020 for violating the University\u2019s sexual harassment policy and that sanctions and remediation activities were imposed. Furthermore, the University did not provide specific details of the allegations, and informed that the comments that led to the determination of violation were subtle, ones that could be \u201cmisinterpreted\u201d by the women. The reprimand included suspension without pay for 10 days, with progressive monitoring by the Department Chair. The letter dated May 13 noted that Dr. Gilbert was \u201ccontrite\u201d and \u201cexpressed remorse.\u201d The letter also noted that Dr. Gilbert was \u201cmoving to the San Diego Biomedical Research Institute in the next several months understood that, as of both May 13 and June 8, 2021, Dr. Gilbert remained employed at the University, planned to move to San Diego Biomedical Institute, and was closely monitored by the University. The news article published on November 16, 2021, paints a different, and more serious, picture of Dr. Gilbert\u2019s misconduct. The article includes the following key information that the University did not previously report to NIH: \u2022 Dr. Gilbert made multiple inappropriate and offensive sexual comments with little room for misinterpretation, and engaged in unwelcomed touching. For example, the news article notes that he emailed a student describing an erotic dream that included the student, and said he hoped something like that would happen in the future. He also told the student he had named his sailboat \u201cBlow me,\u201d and invited her to travel to Japan with him and kissed her on her neck. \u2022 Contrary to being remorseful and contrite, Dr. Gilbert stated that some of the accusations were \u201chearsay, taken out of context, or false.\u201d \u2022 Dr. Gilbert reportedly resigned a few months after the investigation concluded in April 2020, the year before the most recent letter from dated May 13, 2021. \u2022 If he had resigned in 2020, it is unlikely that he was under progressive monitoring by the Department Chair in 2021. In addition to Dr. Gilbert, we have previously worked with you on two other work environment cases which came to our attention, involving Drs. Leslie Beitsch and Gregg Stanwood. We also learned of a new work environment case by another faculty member, Dr. Ross May, in the news article. In January of 2021, we learned that Dr. Leslie Beitsch was reprimanded for making unwelcome sexual advances to three (3) women. Each woman alleged that Dr. Beitsch touched their thighs while seated. An investigation started in July 2019. Dr. Beitsch was reportedly found in violation of the University\u2019s Sex Discrimination and Sexual Misconduct Policy after an investigation by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Compliance. Although the University\u2019s report to was limited to the findings from the 2019 investigation, we learned that Dr. Beitsch\u2019s pattern of behavior dated back to 2014. Dr. Beitsch wrote a letter of commitment in an application (K01 HL159040-01) submitted by on October 9, 2020, a year after his reprimand letter dated October 7, 2019, as department chair. Based on the news article regarding Dr. Gilbert, we hope this case was not minimized and if there is a chance that happened, we presume you will review again. In February of 2020 learned that Dr. Gregg Stanwood allegedly made inappropriate sexual jokes to an academic program specialist at the University. The University assessed the complaints and determined that it did not meet the standard required by the University to proceed to investigations. Dr. Stanwood was funded by R21MH116429, which concluded in 2021, and has at least one grant application under review (e.g., R21 OH012124). We similarly hope that the case was not minimized. In November of 2021 learned in the news article about a new work environment case involving Dr. Ross May, namely that he was fired from the University after he allegedly pressured a student to get drunk, hugged her \u201cin a forceful way\u201d in a photograph and made a bet with another student that he could have sex with her by the end of the semester. Incidents reportedly took place in 2019, and the investigation completed in 2020. Dr. May submitted two grant applications to in 2015 and 2016 (R21 NR015985-01 and R34 AT008803-01), although the applications were ultimately not funded. We would like to know if the alleged events were linked to NIH-funded activities. The University has previously stated that the Medical School and the University are deeply committed to providing an inclusive and safe learning and working environment. However, given the information that has received to date via news articles involving four faculty members remains concerned about the research environment at the University. The Grants Policy Statement, also included as a term and condition on all grant awards, states in Section 4, Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates, that recipients are expected to provide safe and healthful working conditions for their employees and foster work environments conducive to high-quality research. In addition, please provide with updated University-wide actions it is taking to assure that NIH-funded research and training is conducted in a civil, safe, and respectful environment, free from discrimination and unlawful harassment. Please include the following: 1. Any retrospective reviews, or other steps the University has taken in light of these new revelations regarding Dr. Gilbert in the news article, to determine if the University provided sufficient review and oversight on the above referenced cases that were raised to NIH\u2019s attention; 2. The policies and procedures in place to prevent discriminatory harassment and other discriminatory practices, including any changes or proposed changes resulting from these incidents; 3 description of how the University responds to allegations of discriminatory practices, including required notifications to Office of Civil Rights; 4. Institutional policies and procedures for requesting prior approval of a change in status of the Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) or other senior/key personnel if administrative or disciplinary action is taken that impacts the ability of the or other key personnel to continue his/her role on the award described in the training grant application; and 5. The oversight and internal controls the University has in place to ensure that individuals are complying with the above-referenced policies and procedures. Please include whether the University intends to reassess its framework of policies and procedures to determine if they successfully prevent discriminatory harassment and other discriminatory practices ensuring that NIH-sponsored research is conducted in a civil, safe, and respectful environment, free from discrimination and unlawful harassment, in light of the above information. We ask that you provide your responses within 60 days of the date of this letter. Sincerely, -s- Michael Lauer Michael Lauer Deputy Director for Extramural Research One Center Drive, Building 1, Room 144 Bethesda 20892 301-496-1096 [email protected]", "8621_102.pdf": "Quotable... \u201cThe mistakes of the past are valuable lessons for the future.\u201d -- Lailah Gifty Akita Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your browser. Case in Point: Lessons for the proactive manager November 2020 Vol. 12 No. 11 Subscribe! When first addressed the global pandemic in this publication in March never imagined that we would be approaching the end of the year with the same issues continuing throughout the world. It has been a year we could never have imagined when we began 2020 with the usual excitement of a new year. As thought about this pandemic, risk management, and the higher education industry, a couple of points came to mind. Here at AU, we have been very fortunate to have navigated this event extremely well due to excellent leadership. However, there are things we would probably do differently if we knew then what we know now. One suggestion have for all institutions in higher education is to document the lessons we\u2019ve learned for specific areas of operation as well as at an institutional level. We need to ensure we don\u2019t lose the lessons learned through this crisis. Who knows? They may come in handy in a few years. I\u2019d suggest documenting answers to the following kinds of questions: 1. What did we do right in the pandemic? 2. What did we do wrong in the pandemic? 3. What do we wish we\u2019d have done that we didn\u2019t do? Just a few thoughts you might consider to help your institution be better equipped to manage the next big thing. We again invite you to review the events in higher education over the past month with a view toward proactive risk management. As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions. M. Kevin Robinson Associate Vice President Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy Follow us onTwitter 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 1/7 Information Security & Technology Events Nov 24: Data Breach: Illinois Valley Community College has sent out more than 160,000 letters to current and former students, faculty and applicants warning them that their data may have been compromised in connection with a data breach back in April. Cheryl Roelfsema, IVCC's vice president for business services and finance, said that, as of now, the school is unaware of any incidents related to the data obtained from the breach. (link) Fraud & Ethics Related Events Nov 24: Wire Fraud former Purdue University professor and his wife, accused of funneling more that $1 million in National Science Foundation research money into a private company that served as a front to pay for their own personal expenses, were sentenced Monday to two years of probation and will have to pay a combined $1.6 million in restitution. The two were ordered jointly and severally liable to pay a total of $1.6 million in restitution, $1,351,996 of which goes to the National Science Foundation and $300,000 to the Indiana Economic Development Corp. (link) Nov 20: Embezzlement former Chicago State University professor and interim dean is facing federal charges alleging she embezzled more than $650,000 from a student-based organization and used the funds for herself and her family. Carmita Coleman, 49, was charged Friday in the Northern District of Illinois court with four counts of wire fraud following a five-year scheme from 2011 to 2016 in which she allegedly took $651,272 from a national student organization that works to improve minority representation in the pharmacy industry. (link) Nov 17: Embezzlement: Special agents from the State Auditor's Office arrested a 60-year-old former Northeast Mississippi Community College employee, charging her with embezzlement and asking her to pay nearly $70,000. Amy Haynie is accused of embezzling cash from one of the college's petty cash fund and from students as they paid various college-related fees. Haynie was able to manipulate the records of how cash was collected and deposited. The lack of internal controls allowed her to hide the scheme for nearly four years. (link) Nov 16: Admissions Scandal/Bribery former Harvard University fencing coach and the chief executive of a telecommunications company were arrested on Monday on charges they engaged in a bribery scheme aimed at securing the admission of the businessman's two sons to the Ivy League school. Federal prosecutors in Boston said Jie \"Jack\" Zhao paid more than $1.5 million in bribes so that Peter Brand, the former coach, would help his sons get into Harvard by recruiting them to the men's fencing team. (link) Nov 13: Foreign Funding Fraud medical researcher and professor who had been working most recently at Ohio State University pleaded guilty Thursday to a charge stemming from what prosecutors called a sophisticated scheme to transfer U.S.-backed research to China. Song Guo Zheng, 58, of suburban Hilliard, and his research groups secured more than $4.3 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health for projects while receiving overlapping funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, according to a criminal complaint unsealed this year. (link) 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 2/7 Nov 11: Fraud: The head of a suburban Chicago biotechnology company swindled the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics out of more than $1.6 million for personal protective equipment it urgently needed last March as the coronavirus was beginning to unfold here, federal authorities say. The equipment, they said, was never delivered to the hospital. Instead, they allege, the man used money he had defrauded from the Iowa City hospital and another university hospital to buy two Maserati automobiles and a Land Rover sport-utility vehicle. (link) Nov 03: Embezzlement former Unity College employee has pleaded guilty in federal court in Bangor to wire fraud, according to the United States Attorney's Office in Maine. Beth Bing, 49, of Waterville pleaded guilty Thursday to making unauthorized purchases on her Unity College credit card and using fraudulent telephone and email communications, according to court documents. Bing, who worked in finance for the college, racked up transactions totaling $516,834, according to federal prosecutors. From September 2015 through October 2019, Bing made \"personal purchases and payments, both over the internet and in point-of-sale transactions,\" without the knowledge or approval of Unity College officials, according to court records. (link) Compliance/Regulatory & Legal Events Nov 30: Discrimination Lawsuit: It has been 18 months since researchers from the University of Southern California exposed \"a palpable climate of anti-Blackness at Southwestern College\" that included Black employees being called racial slurs and being overlooked for promotions. And even though the South Bay community college has taken significant steps to address the report's findings, a group of five current and former Black employees have filed a discrimination lawsuit, suggesting the problems persist. (link) Nov 21: Public Records Lawsuit: This week, Brennan will face the next chapter in her fight against LSU. She's set to testify Monday afternoon in a court hearing over LSU's refusal to release full, unredacted police reports that she filed after her encounter with Guice. After Brennan and Today, which broke her story this week, filed a public records lawsuit against the university released some police reports this week. But the reports do not include Guice's name, and has continued to redact names of suspects, witnesses and victims in police reports that it has released to the public. Brennan called the reports that did release to her -- short on details, names blacked out -- \"a slap in the face.\" (link) Nov 20 Violations former University of Alabama associate athletics director violated ethical conduct rules when he received money in exchange for facilitating a meeting between the father of a student-athlete, a financial advisor and the financial advisor's representative, according to a decision released by the Division Committee on Infractions. The violations were discovered as part of a broader scheme involving money and influence in college basketball. (link) Nov 19: Sexual Misconduct Florida State University dean reprimanded a high-ranking chair within the College of Medicine after an investigation into sexual misconduct complaints by the school's Office of Equal Opportunity and Compliance. In separate interviews with lead investigator Amber Wagner, an human resources administrator, three women who worked at the college reported what they perceived to be unwelcome sexual advances from Dr. Leslie Beitsch, chair of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine at the College of Medicine. (link) 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 3/7 Nov 19: Allegation Damages Lawsuit McGill student who was accused of sexual assault is now suing the university, a student paper, two student organizations and his accuser, saying his life has been unfairly ruined. Declan McCool, 24, is seeking $1.5 million in damages. McCool had just been elected the vice-president of McGill's student society last February when he was told that another student had accused him of sexual assault. He wasn't told who the accuser was, he said, or given details of the accusation, but he was required to defend himself before a committee of four engineering students. (link) Nov 18: Child Pornography McNeese State University faculty member is under arrest after an inappropriate image appeared in the background during an online class, according to university officials. Steven Stinnett, 48, was arrested late Tuesday on four counts of pornography involving juveniles. Stinnett was released at 8:20 a.m. Wednesday on $100,000 bond, set by Judge Sharon Wilson. Stinnett is a physics professor, according to his LinkedIn page. (link) Nov 18: Murder Charge University of Notre Dame employee has been charged with murder. Nijinsky Dix, 37, is also a PhD student at the University of Illinois Chicago. She's accused of killing her ex-boyfriend in Washington, D.C. on Saturday. Police say she may have been stalking her ex following their three month relationship, which ended in May. According to the University, Dix is the director of the Talent Search Upward Bound program. They say they are aware of her arrest and will cooperate with law enforcement as appropriate. (link) Nov 18: Sexual Harassment Settlement: The University of Michigan has reached a $9.25 million settlement with eight women who were sexually harassed by Martin Philbert, the former provost and chief academic officer at the school, the school and the women's lawyers confirmed. The names of the eight women were not released. The settlement did not include Philbert himself. The women could still file a lawsuit against him. (link) Nov 18: Title Allegations: Current and former female student-athletes, angered by what they call mistreatment of sexual misconduct victims by Colorado State University's athletic department, are making their grievances public in a show of solidarity. They assert athletic administrators have repeatedly failed to notify the university's Title compliance office within 24 hours after a reported incident, as required by federal law and university protocol related to sex discrimination protections. (link) Nov 17: Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Settlement: The prestigious University of California system has reached a proposed $73 million settlement with seven women who accused a former gynecologist of sexual abuse. As part of the class-action lawsuit, more than 6,600 patients of Dr. James Heaps could receive part of the settlement - even if they have not accused the former University of California, Los Angeles, gynecologist of abuse. (link) Nov 16: Title IX: For more than a year, people at the highest levels of the Louisiana State University athletic department fielded complaints about their prized running back, Derrius Guice. Early in the spring 2016 semester, a member of the diving team told her coach and an athletic department administrator that Guice raped her friend after she'd passed out drunk at a party. (link) Nov 15 Compliance: When Turner Yates arrived at Missouri in the summer of 2015, so much seemed possible. Former Missouri head coach Sasha Schmid had personally recruited her, and Yates was excited for her future. But just a year later, Yates was transferring. She says that she was pressured to play through an ankle injury so severe that after her freshman year, she had to undergo reconstructive surgery. Dating back to at least 2015, former Missouri tennis players say team trainers mishandled injuries and coaches held practices that violated rules and created a culture that fostered a lack of trust. (link) Nov 12: Race in Admissions appeals court on Thursday upheld Harvard University's use of race in undergraduate admissions, rejecting a challenge by affirmative action opponents who said 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 4/7 the elite Ivy League college's policy discriminates against Asian Americans. Opponents of the decision by the first circuit court of appeals in Boston promised to appeal to the supreme court, where legal experts believe the 6-3 conservative majority could use the case to end more than 40 years of allowing race as a factor in higher education admissions. (link) Nov 11: Sexual Harassment: When Colorado State University student Lacey Mitchell met construction management assistant professor Ronald Holt, she remembers connecting with him over their shared love for artwork. \"He was the first construction teacher had,\" Mitchell said. \"He taught Construction 150.\" In the fall of 2019, Mitchell was trying out for a beauty pageant. Though she had her headshots taken, she agreed to a photoshoot offered by Holt. (link) Nov 11: Sexual Assault/Negligence Lawsuit: Lycoming College allegedly permitted an environment that allowed female students to be victimized in sexual assaults, according to a former student who filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. Middle District Court. The student, identified as Jane Doe, said that she was sexually assaulted by a men's basketball player in a dormitory two years ago. She has since transferred to another college claiming she felt unsafe at the liberal arts college. (link) Nov 10: Stalking/Harassment UConn police officer was arrested Tuesday after he harassed, photographed and stalked two coworkers, a top prosecutor said. Peter J. Zavickas, 54, a 17-year veteran assigned to the university's Avery Point campus in Groton, was arrested and charged with two counts each of electronic stalking, second-degree stalking, third-degree computer crime and fifth-degree computer crime. Authorities accused Zavickas of stalking two public safety employees by tracking their movements through university surveillance videos and by following them in person on UConn's Storrs campus, according to a warrant for his arrest. (link) Nov 05: Patterns in Sexual Abuse: Ohio State's Task Force on Sexual Abuse released a report Thursday identifying two principle themes that emerged in its work and analyzing patterns in chronic sexual abuse in higher education. The task force, which was assembled in fall 2019, reviewed public records of past sexual abuse cases in higher education nationwide, according to a university press release. Using those records, the task force was charged with discovering recurring patterns and identifying barriers to reporting incidents of misconduct, and identifying best practices to encourage reporting and for providing support for victims and survivors. (link) Campus Life & Safety Events Nov 30: Attempted Murder former Lehigh University student and chemistry major could face at least 20 years in prison after admitting that he laced his roommate's food and drink with a poisonous heavy metal. Yukai Yang pleaded guilty Monday to a single felony count of attempted murder after admitting he poisoned his roommate with the heavy metal, thallium. Yang acknowledged in court that he purchased the thallium used to poison his roommate. (link) Nov 24: Hazing: The University of Iowa has suspended -- effectively deregistering -- its Acacia Fraternity for high-risk hazing and a long list of violations, like berating new members for \"religious, political beliefs, or racial/ethnic identity,\" including during an initiation ceremony at the Masonic Temple of Iowa City. \"All new members were berated and called demeaning and misogynistic names at various times during Initiation Week,\" according to a lengthy investigative report provided to The Gazette following a public records request. (link) 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 5/7 Nov 22: Greek Life: For years has been plagued by dangerous and sometimes illegal behaviors within its clutch of fraternities and sororities. Now, one year after the tragedy, the scope of that misconduct is coming into focus. An investigation by the Union-Tribune revealed that in the five years leading up to the accident, Greek chapters were widely and repeatedly called to account for a slew of violations. They allowed underage students to drink alcohol, performed abusive hazing rituals, and were accused of sexual harassment and assault, according to confidential records obtained through the California Public Records Act. (link) Nov 10: Vandalism man has admitted to spray-painting a racial slur on and otherwise damaging Iowa State University property in August. Nathan Page, 19, pleaded guilty Tuesday to criminal trespass and fourth-degree criminal mischief, both serious misdemeanors. Page was a freshman at Iowa State at the time of the crime. (link) Nov 11: Abuse Allegations: Wichita State and Gregg Marshall are expected to part ways in the coming days, a source told Sports, confirming a report from Stadium's Jeff Goodman on Tuesday night. The 57-year-old Marshall, who took Wichita State to the 2013 Final Four and is the winningest coach in school history (331-121), had been subject to a months-long investigation after allegations surfaced earlier this year regarding multiple verbal and physical incidents against former players and staff members. (link) Nov 06: Sexual Assault former Susquehanna University student has been found guilty of two misdemeanor counts of indecently assaulting her roommate in Hassinger Hall the day after the May 2019 commencement. But, a Snyder County jury Thursday acquitted Pratigya Thakur, 21, of the Bronx, N.Y., of rape. She remains free on $10,000 bail pending sentencing. She is no longer a student at Susquehanna. (link) Nov 05: Abuse Allegations: Midway through her freshman season at Oregon State, Kyla Waiters locked herself in the bathroom, and a concerned teacher's assistant called 911 just thought didn't want to live anymore,\" Waiters said. Her decision a few months earlier to accept a scholarship to play volleyball for coach Mark Barnard's team had been seeded with promises and hope. Before a single semester had passed, all that was gone. (link) Nov 02: Hazing: According to an affidavit signed by Police, Terry Pat Reynolds has been arrested for criminal hazing and failure to seek assistance after a Phi Kappa Psi pledge was put on life support after being hazed in Mid-October. Police say Reynolds then instructed the pledges to finish all the alcohol given to them and wouldn't let them leave until they had. Witnesses told police that Reynolds kept bringing out more alcohol, saying they hadn't finished the previous bottles fast enough. (link) Nov 01: Campus Sit-in Against Violence: The Students for Survivors Coalition has decided to end their sit-in following the releasing of a statement this evening from Clemson University President Jim Clements acknowledging the issue of interpersonal violence on college campuses. The Students for Survivors Coalition originally began the sit-in on Oct. 21, demanding more resources for victims of interpersonal violence and sexual assault be made available to survivors on Clemson's campus. (link) If you have any suggestions, questions or feedback, please e-mail me at [email protected]. We hope you find this information useful and would appreciate hearing your thoughts. Feel free to forward this email to your direct reports, colleagues, employees or others who might find it of value. Back issues of this newsletter are available on our web site. 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 6/7 If you have any suggestions for items to include in future newsletters, please e-mail Robert Gottesman at [email protected]. Back to top \u00a9 Redistribution of this newsletter, with or without modification, is permitted provided Auburn University Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy is listed as the source. 2/22/25, 8:29 Case In Point 7/7", "8621_103.pdf": "1 Sexual Harassment on the Campus Spotlight on Problems and Solutions Report by the Faculty Senate Task Force on Sexual Harassment March 16, 2022 Prof. Petra Doan, Chair Prof. Todd Adams, Prof. Enrique Alvarez, Prof. Fran Berry Prof. Michael Blaber, Prof. Ralph Brower, Prof. Kathryn Jones Prof. Irene Padavic, Prof. Xinlin Tang 2 Section One: Purpose and Context for the Task Force During the Spring semester of 2021, an article in the Florida Phoenix by Lucy Morgan (Morgan 2021a) revealed that longtime Professor Richard Feiock had resigned from the University in the wake of sexual harassment complaints. More disturbingly, the article revealed that Professor Feiock had been the subject of a series of such complaints dating from 1991 and yet had remained a professor in the Askew School of Public Administration. He resigned immediately prior to being interviewed by FSU\u2019s Human Resources Office, which had been charged with investigating the most recent (2020) complaint Tallahassee Democrat article by Dobson (2021) also highlighted the case and raised concerns about how the University had handled it, given the years-long history of harassment complaints against this faculty member. After discussion in the Florida State University Faculty Senate Steering Committee, Senate President Dr. Eric Chicken called for the formation of a Task Force on Sexual Harassment to investigate recent sexual harassment cases. He invited several Faculty Senators to be members and provided the task force with the following charge: The initial charge and focus of this task force is understand the failings of recent harassment cases in terms of (1) reporting up the chain, (2) lack of openness, (3) timely action by admin, (4) reporting of findings. Longer term specific goals include determining ways to: reduce the number of incidents reduce the suffering of the victims make it clear how individuals can file complaints - including skipping supervisors who do not follow up let everyone know what is unacceptable behavior ensure people know their responsibility to report unacceptable behavior receive the numbers / frequency of complaints and the actions taken The Faculty Senate Task Force on Sexual Harassment began meeting in May of 2021. The Task Force interviewed faculty from the Askew School as well as faculty from other Colleges where complaints of sexual harassment had occurred, including in the College of Arts and Sciences and the College of Health and Human Sciences. These interviews focused on assessing which aspects of the complaint process, the investigatory process, and the communication processes went well and which were in need of improvement. We also interviewed Vice President for Faculty Development and advancement, Janet Kistner; Associate Vice President for Human Resources, Renisha Gibbs; Director of the Title Office, Tricia Bucholz; Director of HR-Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, Michelle Douglas; Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer, Robyn Blank; Dean of the College of Medicine, John Fogarty; Dean of the College of Health and Human Sciences, Michael Delp; Chair of Biological Sciences, Dr. Thomas Houpt; representatives of the Graduate Assistants Union; and several faculty members. 3 We read documents from universities with high-profile sexual harassment cases to assess how they had revamped their reporting, investigatory, and communication processes in the wake of the investigations. We examined data from the Academic Sexual Misconduct Database (Libarkin, n.d.), an independent website that gathers publicly-available data. Finally, we gathered data from regarding the number of complaints and investigations related to sexual harassment in recent years, and reviewed public reporting of these incidents. We also reviewed redacted investigation reports for the five recent cases this report covers. Regarding the scope of this report, sexual harassment complaints of student-on-student harassment go through the Title office, and sexual harassment complaints involving staff and faculty are addressed by Human Resources, in the Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (HR-EDI). The Task Force focused on the problems and possible solutions for the latter group and thus did not consider student-student harassment. The Task Force\u2019s goal is to report the experiences of people in the community who have been involved in the sexual harassment complaint and investigation processes, to provide details of problems experienced in these processes, and to offer thoughts about possible improvements. The members of the Task Force recognize that the potential for harm is great both for parties affected by harassment as well as for faculty members subjected to spurious complaints of harassment. It is not within the Task Force\u2019s authority to adjudicate the merits of any of these cases, but we do wish to highlight the seriousness of these issues. Accordingly, this report takes as its focus both the prevention of future harassment and the assurance that the reporting process and the subsequent investigations are transparent, thorough, and fair. The remainder of this report is divided into several sections. The second section presents a brief review of the literature regarding the extent, definitions, and consequences of campus sexual harassment at the national level. The third identifies points of weakness in FSU\u2019s processes by reporting on recent cases. The final section offers recommendations for improvements and identifies areas that need further study as continues to act on its commitment to protecting faculty, staff, and students from sexual harassment. Faculty Senators can access the investigative reports and the Memorandum by Robyn Blank (Blank 2021) outlining communication procedures in sexual misconduct cases by signing onto the Faculty Senate Canvas page. Section 2: Sexual Harassment in U.S. Universities The Faculty Senate Task Force recognizes that the viral expansion of the \u201cMe Too\u201d movement has helped shine a light on the seriousness and pervasiveness of sexual harassment in U.S. universities. Although not a thorough literature review, this section outlines the extent of the problem, definitions, some characteristics of perpetrators and victims, and the consequences faced by parties who have been harassed. The problem is pervasive. The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) recently conducted an intensive study of the levels and effects of the sexual harassment of undergraduate and graduate students by faculty or staff 2018). The 4 Report indicates that more than 50 percent of women faculty/staff and 20\u201350 percent of women students have experienced sexual harassment at universities (p. 172). Another national study is by the Association of American Universities, which conducted a climate survey at 33 universities with a total of 181,754 respondents, comprising 108,221 undergraduates and 73,531 graduate and professional students (Cantor et al., 2020). The researchers found that 42 percent had reported being harassed at least once since they had enrolled. Another recent study, conducted throughout the University of Texas System (Swartout 2018), found that 20 percent of undergraduate and graduate female science students, over 25 percent of female engineering students, and over 40 percent of female medical students had experienced sexual harassment on the part of faculty or staff (Swartout, 2018 similar study conducted of the Pennsylvania State University System revealed that one-third of undergraduates, 43 percent of graduate students, and half of medical students had been harassed by faculty or staff. These numbers suggest that the problem of sexual harassment is widespread. Definitions of sexual harassment vary. One that is useful was developed by the National Academy of Sciences Study on Sexual Harassment 2018; 28). The defines sexual harassment as a form of discrimination that is composed of three categories of behavior: (1) gender harassment (verbal and nonverbal behaviors that convey hostility, objectification, exclusion, or second-class status about members of one gender), (2) unwanted sexual attention (verbal or physical unwelcome sexual advances, which can include assault), and (3) sexual coercion (when favorable professional or educational treatment is conditioned on sexual activity). This definition is similar to the one developed by the Association of American Universities, which defines it as consisting of sexual connotations that interfered with an individual\u2019s academic or professional performance, limited the individual\u2019s ability to participate in an academic program, or created an intimidating, hostile, or offensive social, academic, or work environment (Cantor et al.). Another useful definition comes from the Office of Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Education (U.S. Department of Education, n.d.). It holds that sexual harassment refers to sex- based conduct that satisfies one or more of the following: (1) quid pro quo harassment by an employee of an educational institution\u2014meaning that an employee offers something to a student or other person in exchange for sexual conduct; (2) unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would find to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to an education program or activity; or (3) sexual assault (as defined in the Clery Act), dating violence, domestic violence, or stalking (as defined in the Violence Against Women Act). Each of these categories of misconduct is a serious violation that jeopardizes a victim\u2019s equal access to education. All these definitions make clear that harassing behavior can be either direct (targeted at an individual) or ambient (a general level of sexual harassment in an environment). The study (2018, p. 32) includes the following useful heuristic: 5 Figure 1. Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, p. 32. 6 It can be hard to estimate the prevalence of sexual harassment because of difficulties collecting data direct query about having experienced it or not, for example, garners far lower positive responses than does a set of questions that instead itemize the specific behaviors that constitute sexual harassment but do not use the label (Ilies et al., 2003). This seems to point to a tendency for respondents to introduce distance between themselves and the category. Similarly, of the three major categories of harassment displayed in Figure 1, researchers have found that women who experience gender harassment (versus the sexual-advances type represented by the other categories) are seven times less likely to categorize the experience as sexual harassment (Holland and Cortina 2013). Hesitancy to report also makes it difficult to gather accurate data: over half (59 percent) of respondents who had experienced sexual harassment did not report it to their employer, the EEOC, the police or the media (Vagins and Gatta 2019, p. 5). Finally, the underrepresentation of women of color and sexual- and gender-minorities likely produces unreliable rates of prevalence for these vulnerable populations 2018). Nevertheless, it is possible to draw some conclusions about groups that are more likely to have been harassed. The Report notes that women are more likely than men to be targets of sexual harassment (NASEM, 2018, p. 171 survey of graduate and undergraduate students by the Association of American Universities (AAU) reveals that women graduate students were more likely than women undergraduates to have experienced harassment. The most marginalized populations, especially women of color, experience harassment at greater rates (e.g., Buchanan, Settles, and Woods 2008; Clancy et al. 2017; Cortina 2004; Cortina et al. 1998). Women who identify as lesbian, bisexual, or as having a non-normative gender-identity also are more likely to experience harassment, as are men who identify as gay, bisexual, and gender non-normative. One study of 629 employees in higher education (147 sexual-minority women, 82 sexual- minority men, 219 heterosexual women, and 181 heterosexual men) indicated that nearly 70 percent of sexual minorities (of both genders) experienced gender harassment, whereas only 30 percent of heterosexuals (of both genders) experienced it (Konik and Cortina 2008, p. 324). As for perpetrators of harassment, some basic characteristics tend to appear. Men are more likely than women to perpetrate sexual harassment (NASEM, p. 171). In the field of graduate biomedical and health sciences, one study (Espinoza and Hsiehchen 2020) used targeted Google searches and found that between 1982 and 2019, 125 faculty had been accused of sexual misconduct and that these incidents involved at least 1,668 targets. Particular faculty members represented a wide range of institutions, but over one-third came from institutions ranked in the top 50 universities by News & World Report. The vast majority of accused faculty members were men (97.6%), and the vast majority of the people they sexually harassed were women (91.5%). Most of the faculty perpetrators were senior faculty and administrators, including full professors, department chairs, and deans. The consequences of sexual harassment are profound for those who have experienced it. The national study found that 19 percent of student respondents had experienced harassing actions that had interfered with their academic or professional performance, negatively impacted their ability to participate in an academic program or had created an academic, work, or social environment that was intimidating, hostile, or offensive (Cantor et al., 2020 p, xiii). The Report highlighted the fact that \u201cwomen\u2019s experiences of sexual harassment are associated with reductions in their professional, psychological, and physical health 7 2018, p. 68) and pointed to three types of effects: reduction in the ability to perform in a work environment, reduction in school performance (i.e., GPA; degree acquisition), and reduction in personal health and well-being study of 311members of the American Association of University Women (Vagins and Gatta 2019) found pervasive negative impacts for women faculty who had experienced harassment large majority (86%) had experienced at least one form of sexual harassment during their careers smaller percentage had experienced sexual coercion (12%), unwanted sexual attention (61%), and sex-based harassment (65%). The consequences included decisions to leave a job early (38%) and disrupted career advancement (27%). Finally, the report highlighted the physical and emotional toll on women who have experienced harassing behaviors. Sexual harassment is a serious issue that damages employees and students and that reflects poorly on a university; thus, it deserves careful scrutiny and action by higher-level administrators to ensure that steps are taken to reduce its incidence. Section 3: Review of Recent Sexual Harassment Cases at This section provides a brief review of some recent cases of sexual harassment and misconduct. It begins with an overview of institutional data provided by Human Resources on cases since 2008 that involved a faculty member. The locus of investigation at has shifted over the years, and Human Resources took responsibility beginning in 2008. We note that the shifting of the responsibility for investigation has led to confusion about the housing of data from earlier cases. Following the overview of institutional data some of the highly visible cases in recent years are reviewed. The media have covered these incidents, so the information is not new, nor is the Task Force investigating or revisiting the findings of these cases; the intent is to unpack the processes set in motion once a complaint was made. The cases occurred in four colleges--Social Sciences and Public Policy, Arts and Sciences, Medicine, and Health and Human Science\u2014and the Task Force interviewed faculty and administrators familiar with these cases. These cases are not exhaustive of all misconduct and harassment cases, but they are high visibility cases that offer useful lessons. As noted above, investigative reports on the cases can be found on the Faculty Senate website. The first case considered below is that of Prof. Richard Feiock, Professor in the Askew School of Public Administration in the College of Social Sciences and Public Policy. This case is especially troubling since his pattern of harassment extended over a 30-year time horizon. The next is the case of Prof. David Gilbert in the Department of Biological Sciences in the College of Arts and Sciences. It is followed by the case of Dr. Ross May in the Family Institute in the College of Health and Human Sciences. The last set of cases are from the College of Medicine, and concern Dr. Leslie Beitsch and Dr. James Zedeker. 8 Institutional Data The Task Force requested that the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Office in Human Resources provide recent data on the number of complaints, formal investigations, and outcomes of cases for the past 14 years. These data are presented graphically below and show an average of two instances of substantiated sexual harassment cases each year over the period 2008-2021 substantiated determination means that the allegations, as determined through a thorough investigation, are a violation of policy. We now turn to details of the recent cases in the four colleges mentioned above. 9 Incident in the Askew School of Public Administration and Policy in the College of Social Sciences and Public Policy Numerous allegations of sexual misconduct by Professor Richard Feiock of the Askew School of Public Administration and Policy arose over a more-than-30-year timeframe. During that lengthy period, the office responsible for investigations changed, and the most serious problems with investigation and sanctions described below predate the formation in 2008 of the current HR-Equity, Diversity and Inclusion office. Professor Feiock\u2019s inappropriate conduct was initially reported to Askew School faculty in 1988, and a report was filed in 1991 with Steve Edwards, the Dean of Faculties (today the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement fills a similar position) based on allegations from several students. In response to these complaints, the former Dean of the College of Social Sciences (now the College of Social Sciences and Public Policy), Chuck Cnudde, told Professor Feiock to receive counseling but imposed no further sanctions. Over the years, colleagues and students continued to observe Professor Feiock engaging in harassing behaviors toward women students at conferences and in social settings off campus. Students discussed upsetting incidents with faculty, but asked that their complaints not be formalized. Specific incidents in 2005 and 2016 generated reports of inappropriate touching and sexual propositions, but these did not result in formal sanctions. Although Dean Rasmussen was made aware of these continuing concerns, he chose to take no other action. In fact, despite these incidents, beginning in 1991, Professor Feiock was tenured and promoted twice. Moreover, due presumably to his strong record of research funding, he was subsequently appointed to an endowed chair and another named chair. He became well known in the field of public administration because of his prolific research and publishing, and this renown attracted students to his \u201clocal governance laboratory,\u201d which operated in a somewhat secretive climate, making it difficult for faculty colleagues to monitor activities there. The lack of administrative action may be why a \u201cwhisper network\u201d arose within and the Askew School and also among women scholars in the broader Public Administration field. This whisper network accumulated numerous alleged but unreported instances of misconduct. Some of the affected parties were female international faculty at other universities and international students in the Askew School who may have felt that their funding status or future career trajectories were dependent on Professor Feiock\u2019s research funds, supervision, and professional networks. But a number of the concerns came from domestic students, so his advances were not directed only at international women students. Askew School faculty also received informal reports from prospective international women students who chose to avoid the Askew School because of Professor Feiock\u2019s reputation. In early January, 2020, another sexual misconduct case arose when several Askew School doctoral students received a string of text messages involving a recently departed visiting doctoral student from China who had been sponsored by Dr. Feiock review of these exchanges revealed messages between Professor Feiock and the woman student, several of which expressed his attraction and \u201clove\u201d for her. The students who received the emails shared them with Askew School faculty, and two senior professors filed separate reports about the case 10 to FSU\u2019s Title office. The office acted swiftly, and based on the severity of the reports made a determination within 72 hours. Upon being advised of the results of the initial investigation, Dean Tim Chapin of the College of Social Sciences and Public Policy placed Professor Feiock on administrative leave and instructed him to have no contact with students or others involved in the case. The investigators learned, however, that Professor Feiock had contacted the victim to advise her about what to tell investigators, and Dean Chapin subsequently warned him again about the no-communications directive. An investigation immediately ensued, and students and faculty were interviewed by FSU\u2019s compliance investigators. The Human Resources office notified the National Science Foundation (NSF), Dr. Feiock\u2019s granting agency, at the start of the investigation and at its conclusion. The University also took possession of records, emails, and computer files in Professor Feiock\u2019s office, which included, among other things, what appeared to be a photo of Professor Feiock\u2019s genitals. In March, 2020, Dean Tim Chapin was directed by higher administration to approve Professor Feiock\u2019s request to resign--one day before Professor Feiock\u2019s scheduled interview with the University\u2019s investigators. The investigation was terminated at that time, without a finding of substantiated or unsubstantiated. Communication about the case was limited continued to work with the Dean to provide information to those who were impacted, particularly the students who were currently enrolled in the program and had worked with Professor Feiock year later, in March 2021, after the Morgan newspaper articles, Dean Chapin and Renisha Gibbs, Associate for Human Resources, invited students, faculty and staff to attend a Town Hall meeting about combatting sexual harassment to discuss the case and its aftermath. Askew School faculty were frustrated in their efforts to get copies of the final report. The case was not publicly disclosed, even to the faculty who had made formal complaints, until Lucy Morgan, a Pulitzer-prizewinning journalist with the online Florida Phoenix, published a series of four articles beginning in March, 2021, about the case and the consequences to former women students of Professor Feiock\u2019s behavior. After the first of Ms. Morgan\u2019s articles, the story was also picked up by other local and national print and broadcast media. The University does not produce a public report on investigations, including sexual harassment investigations, due to privacy/confidentiality concerns (Blank, 2021). However, all reports and documents are subject to public records request and are accessible (with appropriate redactions) via a public records request to FSU\u2019s Office of the General Counsel. Following publication of the first Morgan article, the Askew School faculty wrote a letter to all Public Administration students and the administration in which they acknowledged their failure to protect students and asked the University to likewise acknowledge its institutional failures, which, they stated, included the following: a) failing to properly heed earlier accusations and discipline Professor Feiock, b) awarding distinguished chairs to Professor Feiock despite administrators\u2019 knowledge of earlier infractions, c) failing to retain records at the University level of any complaints or disciplinary actions and e) the University\u2019s failure to report the 2020 incident in a timely manner so as to allow victims, faculty, and others to find closure and to provide factual information to other universities where Professor Feiock was seeking employment. 11 The Askew faculty also presented several proposals to the Faculty Senate in April 2021, where they received mixed reactions (See Minutes of the Faculty Senate for April 14, 2021). But the Senate\u2019s discussion about apparent institutional missteps over the years led Senate President Dr. Eric Chicken to appoint a task force to provide analyses and recommendations about the broader set of issues around sexual misconduct on campus. Despite the profoundly negative impact of the Feiock case on the affected women students and on the image of the Askew School and the University, a few small steps taken by Askew School faculty, alumni, and by Tim Chapin, the Dean of the College of Social Sciences and Public Policy (COSSPP) have led to positive consequences, as follows: 1) Following the Florida Phoenix articles, Askew faculty led several group counseling sessions with current students and doctoral program alumni, and, although sometimes characterized by considerable angst, these sessions were productive in helping people begin to process their concerns and feelings. 2) The Askew School administered a climate survey to solicit doctoral students\u2019 perceptions of the sexual misconduct situation and then used the information to inform department-level planning for counseling sessions and department-level training. 3 Dean Chapin conducted a series of townhall meetings with faculty and staff regarding the Feiock case and general issues about campus sexual misconduct, during which he affirmed the College\u2019s commitment to helping create a campus where sexual misconduct has no place. 4) The Askew School faculty sought and received training from FSU\u2019s Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion about sexual-misconduct reporting obligations Dean Chapin also organized a number of HR-led trainings for faculty, staff, and students in the College. These trainings were attended by roughly 75 individuals who work and study in the college. 5) COSSPP\u2019s Allyship Committee, led ably by Professors Deana Rohlinger and Will Butler, also met regularly about this, provided feedback to the College community, and shared feedback and advice on how to move forward. 6) The Allyship Committee and leadership are working with units to institutionalize a Climate Survey, and learned that several units (Urban and Regional Planning, Sociology, and Geography) already were doing regular climate surveys. 7) Askew School faculty and doctoral alumni informally advised networks within the profession about the Feiock case, which precluded his ability to gain employment in some university positions, including ones in China, South Korea, Taiwan, and the Philippines. 12 8) The Askew School\u2019s presentation to the Faculty Senate precipitated a discussion that led to the formation of the Sexual Harassment Task Force. 9) Two doctoral program graduates published an article about the case (Young and Wiley 2021), entitled \u201cErased: Why Faculty Sexual Misconduct is Prevalent and How We Could Prevent It.\u201d Visibility in an important journal for professional education in Public Administration may help guide other programs dealing with similar issues. These two graduates also precipitated Lucy Morgan\u2019s interest in the case. 10) As a result of exposure given to the Feiock case, several professional associations within Public Administration subfields have formally undertaken open dialogue to address the problems of sexual misconduct and harassment. For example, at its annual conference in November, 2021, the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action sponsored a colloquium in which several Askew School graduates, in concert with other concerned scholars, formulated a set of recommendations from which the Association is building a code of professional conduct. Thus, while many aspects of the 30-year career of Professor Feiock are very troubling, the attention it garnered has led to some positive changes in the local setting and at the national professional-association level. Incident in the Department of Biological Science, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. David Gilbert was a Professor in Biological Science from 2006-2021, and during most of that time was also the J. Herbert Taylor Distinguished Professor of Molecular Biology. On January 9, 2020, Dr. Gilbert sent an email to a Biology graduate student describing an erotic dream involving her. The student had had previous conversations with Dr. Gilbert in which he had made unwanted sexual comments, and he also had invited her to go on an international trip with him \u201cin lieu of his wife,\u201d from whom he had recently separated. The student found his behavior inappropriate and discussed it with other students in the Department. From these conversations, she learned of other incidents of sexual comments made by Gilbert as well as unwanted attention bestowed on female students and employees. The student then filed a complaint with the Human Resources Office and informed mandatory reporters in the Department, who also reported the student's concerns to the Human Resources Office. The student met with a Victim Advocate to discuss disclosure options and arranged a meeting to be held with met with the student, her boyfriend (a fellow Biology graduate student) and her faculty-member Advocate for an information session. The three options were explained: 1) report only, no action; 2) formal complaint with a possible investigation and determination of policy applicability; and 3) informal resolution to address the behavior without a predetermination of a policy violation. The student chose option #3. The student later explained to another faculty member that she had found the information about how to initiate an investigation confusing. She explained to her faculty advocate that she found the verbal explanation unclear in regard to the procedural steps taken in an \u201cinformal 13 investigation\u201d relative to those taken in a \u201cformal investigation.\u201d (And the Task Force notes that the Sexual Misconduct Policy does not use the word \u201cinformal.\u201d) It turns out that she hadn\u2019t gone through the steps to file a formal investigation. The faculty advocate who assisted her in communicating with the similarly found the process of initiating a formal investigation confusing. After further interaction with HR-EDI, which clarified the steps that would follow from each of the three choices, the student chose option 2, formal complaint. The practice of communicating procedures verbally during a meeting promotes positive interactions that are important to affected parties, but receiving the information at the same time in written form, as well, might lessen the chance of confusion for affected parties who are understandably upset. In the course of the investigation, the interviewed an undergraduate student, several graduate students, several faculty, and Dr. Gilbert. The interview notes include appendices with email chains and text threads supplied by the interviewees, and Dr. Gilbert confirmed several incidents. The Human Resources office notified the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Gilberts\u2019 granting agency, at the start of the investigation and at its conclusion. The investigation concluded on April 17, 2020, with a report finding that it was more likely than not that Dr. Gilbert had engaged in behavior of a sexual nature that was both severe and pervasive and that had created a hostile environment, in violation of the University\u2019s Sex Discrimination and Sexual Misconduct Policy. Substantiated allegations that contributed to the findings included the email about the erotic dream and several other comments to the initial reporting party, inviting an undergraduate student to canoe with him near his home; inviting a female student to accompany him on a trip to Japan unrelated to any academic purpose, kissing an undergraduate student on the neck at a laboratory party, and multiple sexual comments to female students. Per protocol, the finding was referred to the Human Resources Faculty Relations office, which works with college administrators (Provost, Dean, Chair) to determine the appropriate discipline. Dr. Gilbert was suspended without pay for 10 days and lost the title of J. Herbert Taylor Distinguished Professor of Molecular Biology. In the summer of 2021, Dr. Gilbert voluntarily left to take a position at the San Diego Biomedical Research Institute. Incident in the Family Institute and the Department of Family and Child Sciences in the College of Health and Human Sciences Dr. Ross May was hired as a post-doctoral fellow at the Family Institute, where he worked from 2012-2014 and was supervised by the Director of the Family Institute. In 2014, he was appointed as the Associate Director of the Family Institute, and in 2016 he was appointed as a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Human Development and Family Science formal complaint was made in February of 2020 alleging that at a going-away party for a student during the Fall, 2019, semester, Dr. May had pressured a student to get drunk, hugged her \u201cin a forceful way\u201d (as visible in a photograph), and bet another student $50 he could have sex with her by the end of the semester. An investigation was undertaken by staff from the Human Resources Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Office. The investigator interviewed Dr. May and a number of faculty and graduate 14 students who were witnesses to these events. The investigation was completed in May, 2020, and determined that the claims were substantiated and that \u201cDr. May has engaged in a pervasive pattern of inappropriate and unprofessional behavior over the past four years with both undergraduate and graduate students over whom he has held a position of authority.\u201d Moreover, the investigative report substantiated the allegation of a Hostile Academic Environment Based on Sexual Misconduct (Sexual Harassment). Accordingly, a termination letter was sent by Dean Michael Delp, notifying Dr. May of his termination and giving him approximately two months to continue working with Dr. Fincham to transfer data-collection methodologies that were critical to the completion of this grant-funded research. Upon separation from FSU, he was removed from the system. However, unbeknownst to many, he continued to work with Dr. Fincham on the data and manuscripts, and he invoiced for the time he worked as an independent contractor. Upon learning of Dr. Fincham\u2019s actions in retaining Dr. May determined that payment was due, since he had already completed the invoiced work. The original termination letter included a proviso specifying that Dr. May not come to campus or have any interaction with students, and this was agreed to by all parties. Upon learning that Dr. May had been included on several emails between an researcher and students working on that project, in violation of the proviso, the Dean intervened to halt such communications and to discipline the researcher who had initiated them faculty member told the Task Force that the faculty and graduate students were never appraised of the circumstances of Dr. May\u2019s termination and were upset about this silence. When Task Force members interviewed Dean Delp and asked about this, he said that after reviewing the policy on sexual harassment reporting, he felt that it was improper and likely illegal for him to distribute a letter containing the details of Dr. May\u2019s termination. He consulted with and Provost Sally McRorie and requested that the General Counsel approve such a notification. He was informed that the Provost would send a letter informing faculty of the incident and Dr. May\u2019s termination. In discussion with six faculty in that department, however, the Task Force noted that none could find a record of an email announcing this termination, although provided the Task Force with a copy of an email to the department\u2019s faculty from Provost McCrorie dated April 30, 2021. Since then, Dr. May has found alternative employment newspaper article in the Pensacola News Journal reported that Dr. Ross May was teaching two online classes at the University of West Florida, and continued: \"The university was unaware of this investigation when Ross May was hired as an adjunct instructor,\" said Provost George Ellenberg. \"The extensive background checks the university routinely conducts do not show incidents such as this; however, we are currently analyzing the process that was used to hire May\" (Wood November 16, 2021 Google search indicates that Dr. May was subsequently employed by Tallahassee Memorial Hospital for a period of time. Once again, it is unclear if the employer was aware of the reason for his termination. 15 Incidents in the College of Medicine Incident 1 Dr. Leslie Beitsch has a from Harvard University and an from Georgetown University. He was on the faculty at Florida State University from 2003-2021 and served as Chair of the Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine in the College of Medicine current female employee working in the College of Medicine filed a formal complaint regarding an incident of unwelcome sexual advances from Dr. Beitsch. In the course of the investigation, two additional former female employees were identified and interviewed. These events occurred between 2014 and 2019. Each woman alleged that Dr. Beitsch touched her thigh while seated at various events. According to the investigation, there was no \"collusion\" among the women, meaning that their accounts were independent and not the product of conversations among themselves. The University found the allegations substantiated and determined that they constituted a conflict of interest due to Dr. Beitsch\u2019s institutional authority in the College and the women\u2019s subordinate work positions. The finding was referred to Human Resources Faculty Relations who worked with the Dean of the College of Medicine, Dr. John Fogarty, in determining the appropriate discipline. Dr. Beitsch received an official reprimand in October 2019, was directed to take sexual misconduct training (which he did), and was informed that a recurrence would result in further disciplinary action. Dr. Beitsch was in the state\u2019s Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) and had made it clear for several years that he planned to retire in 2021. He stepped down from his Chair role in December 2020 to allow a smooth transition for his replacement in January 2021. Dr. Beitsch retired as planned in July 2021; his stepping down as Chair and his retirement were unrelated to any investigation. Incident 2: Dr. James Zedaker was an Associate Dean in the College of Medicine and was a faculty member in the School of Physician Assistant Practice from 2016-2022. He also served as Director of University Special Projects for the Health and Emergency Operations 19 Clinic from 2020-2022. Two female staff who worked at the Covid testing/vaccination site but were not students or faculty in the Physician Assistant program alleged that Dr. Zedaker made discomfiting comments, sent sexually-oriented texts, and bought them unsolicited gifts. Human Resources responded quickly and initiated a formal investigation. Text exchanges confirmed by investigators include Dr. Zedaker having asked one of the women, a subordinate, to dinner on Valentine's Day, inviting her on trips that he would cover financially where they would share a hotel room, and offering to come over to her house. The other woman reported having received a $5,000 bonus and was subjected, either in person or by text, to comments about her appearance and requests for hugs. The office interviewed the women, along with Dr. Zedaker, who denied many of the allegations but admitted others. The investigation found that objectively, based on a reasonable 16 person standard, his actions were romantic and/or sexual in nature, could be interpreted as romantic and/or sexual advances, were unwelcome, and were potentially grooming in nature. On December 21, 2021, Dr. Zedaker submitted his resignation, with an effective date of January 14, 2022. The Dean wrote to the College\u2019s faculty/staff/and students that same day informing them of his resignation and the reason. Section 4: Recommendations In this section, the Committee offers 21 recommendations, drawing on findings from the cases described in Section 3. 1. We recommend that the Administration produce a flow chart of the investigative process, with hyperlinks to various sections of the Sexual Misconduct Policy. The KnowMore website is quite strong on resources for getting help and support but less strong when it comes to sending complainants directly to information about their particular concern. The complainant needs to realize the need to click on \u201cTitle IX\u201d and from there has to move down five places before arriving at FSU\u2019s Anti-Sexual Misconduct Policy, the document that describes the process used to investigate complaints about students, about employees, and about FSU-School personnel. (The policy can be found here.) The document is 50 pages long and describes the general policy, followed by long appendices about each of the three groups (students, employees School employees). Even readers experienced with complex policies can become confused, thinking they are reading material that applies to all three parties, when in fact it applies to only complaints about a student respondent, for example. The Task Force envisions a flow chart that starts by directing the reader to the three types of complaint. The flow chart would then itemize each step of the complaint, investigation, and resolution, with hyperlinks for each item. The Task Force members believe such a system would make the process much more understandable. Another possibility is to create a document that contains much of the information in the Policy but is more accessible to the average user, and create hyperlinks from the flow chart link to this new document. We envision a document that is not as legalistic as the Policy and yet contains more information on the process than does the University\u2019s Sexual Harassment Training video. 2. The Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion webpage should be updated to include sexual harassment as an area falling under its purview. Neither sexual harassment nor sexual misconduct appears on the homepage, even though this office is the main body for reporting and investigating these behaviors. This omission minimizes the importance of the issue and should be corrected. 3. We recommend that response and communication practices be clearly specified so that affected parties know exactly how the process plays out and approximately how long each phase lasts. 17 The Task Force heard a great many complaints from affected parties about having felt completely \u201cin the dark\u201d during the course of the investigation. The office should respond to an initial complaint within 2 or 3 business days, if possible, and should keep the affected party informed as each step is undertaken. 4. We recommend that review the public-facing security settings on the \u201creport.fsu.edu\u201d website and that it provide a link to the Sexual Misconduct Policy. The \u201creport.fsu.edu\u201d site is a main way to report an incident. But several members of the task force, some of whom used a Google search rather than going directly to the report (as might a complainant), saw a \u201cnot secure\u201d identifier, which could potentially lessen a person\u2019s willingness to file a report. The reporting form itself is a secure site, but it is important that the method for arriving there is, as well, since it might increase the report rate. Another modification is to add a link to the Sexual Misconduct Policy in the introductory paragraph of the reporting form, as potential reporters may be uncertain about what constitutes harassment, which might reduce willingness to report. 5. We recommend that when a complainant or someone with a question is interviewed by personnel in one of the offices associated with sexual harassment, they be given a written document that describes the reporting options. Ideally the options would be components in the flow chart referenced above. In the Biological Sciences case, the affected party had thought she had filed a formal complaint, when, in fact, she had chosen an informal one. The options were verbally laid out at a meeting with EDI, but it seems that a verbal explanation conveyed at a meeting where the affected party is understandably upset was not enough. The affected party did not fully understand the implications of the choice she made, nor did the faculty member who accompanied her. This does not mean the information wasn\u2019t conveyed; it means that it wasn\u2019t conveyed effectively, which could perhaps be remedied by including a written explanation of the options. Finally, such information needs to be easily accessible, perhaps in a document that is more user-friendly than the official Policy, as noted in Recommendation 1. 6. We recommend, to the extent possible, that identifying information about an affected party be redacted. The Task Force heard from interviews with students that some hesitate to file a complaint because of concerns about retaliation and other possible negative consequences, and thus never hears of some complaints. While the names of affected parties do not appear in investigative reports, other identifying information, for example, about the nationality or year in school of an affected party, should be redacted, to the extent permitted by law. 7. We recommend that in order to mitigate any perception of bias that an outside investigator be hired in cases where a conflict of interest exists between a respondent and an administrator assigned a role in the investigation or resolution and in cases where the respondent brings in large amounts of grant funding. 18 It is important that the University community have confidence in the impartiality of an investigation. The Task Force is not implying that any investigations have lacked integrity but instead that perceptions matter. Thus, in cases where a relative of a respondent is in the office of a member of the investigation team or when a respondent brings in large amounts of grant funding or is otherwise in a powerful position, the investigation should be conducted by an impartial third party. Doing so would allay any perception that relationships, institutional power, or grant-getting might have influenced the process. 8. We recommend better communication when an investigation is completed and the charges substantiated. Section 3 reports a wide range of experiences on the dimension of communication and transparency after an investigation is completed. At one end was the Dean of the Medical School who emailed employees about the most recent investigation immediately after it was concluded. At the other end was the lack of notification in regard to the Feiock investigation, which faculty only became aware of when the Tampa Bay Times article appeared, despite their requests for information. In the College of Health and Human Sciences case, it seems no notification was apparently received by faculty, leaving them to rely on a newspaper article for information. 9. We recommend that the University create guidelines indicating who--whether HR, Department Chairs, or Deans\u2014is responsible for notifying faculty, staff, and students of the results of an investigation in which the claims were substantiated. As it stands, there appears to be confusion about whom, if anyone, informs the campus community about the results of an investigation. In some cases it has been the Dean, in others the Chair, and in others no one. Guidelines indicating the roles of these groups in information- dissemination are in order, keeping in mind restrictions about campus-wide announcements per the Robyn Blank Memorandum (Blank 2021). 10. We recommend that a secure home in a specified office be designated for the personnel files of faculty for whom claims were substantiated. Currently, these files have a secure home. But Universities, like all organizations, reorganize from time to time, and if the home were to move to a different office, having an established mechanism to preserve the security and integrity of the reports is essential. In the past, these kinds of changes have led to problems. In the Feiock case, the University could find no record of complaints, perhaps because the responsibility for investigations changed offices. Regardless of the reason, a secure home in a specified central office and in each College should be established so that reports are kept secure long term. 11. We recommend mitigating students\u2019 concern about possible retaliation for reporting sexual misconduct by ensuring that a student\u2019s funding and advisement will continue uninterrupted despite a report. We further recommend that this policy be advertised on the website and that the Provost contribute any funding needed to ensure students\u2019 funding continuation. 19 Students in good academic standing who depend on financial aid and advising from responding parties should be held harmless. Affected graduate students should be reassigned to other supervisors or office spaces immediately rather than awaiting a finding before remediating action is taken. Currently, this is the practice, and is what happened in the Biology and Askew School cases. The University takes \u201cinterim measures\" in which office works with departments to ensure that impacted parties remain \"whole\" during and after an investigation. The Task Force recommends that this policy be widely advertised in order to assuage any student fears about stepping forward. We further recommend that a dedicated source of funding be identified to support impacted students who might otherwise lose their funding; continued funding should not be contingent on the availability of College funds. By making this policy known, it should encourage more students to come forward. 12. We recommend greater transparency about the criteria used in a determination of responsibility and about the penalties associated with a violation. The Committee notes that better access to basic information about the types of information the investigative team considers in making a determination would go a long way towards inspiring confidence in the outcome. The criteria clearly appear in an appendix in the 50-page policy (see page 28 in the Policy), but finding them requires more searching than is desirable. Similarly, the sanctions listed in the Policy (page 28) should be more readily accessible. One possibility is for the flow chart described in Recommendation 1 to include a link to these spots. 13. We recommend that Administrators refrain from using the term \u201czero tolerance\u201d to describe their orientation to sexual harassment and misconduct. This expression is often taken to mean that policy violation will result in termination. In the case of sexual misconduct and harassment at FSU, however, it means that each case will be pursued vigorously and thoroughly. To avoid misunderstanding, it is better to simply eschew the expression. If it is used, an explanation should be made about what is meant by it. 14. We recommend that when a respondent is not interviewed, either because of leaving employment or any other reason, the Investigative Team should nevertheless reach a conclusion based on available evidence. In the Public Administration case, because the respondent left employment without having been formally interviewed, a formal finding in the case was never made. The Committee believes that when a responding party refuses to testify on their own behalf (perhaps because they have left the institution) that does not constitute a reason to stymie an investigation. Instead, the report could note that an attempt was made to gather the respondent\u2019s perspective, the respondent declined, and so a finding was reached without that information. 15. We recommend that the University appoint a Task Force to consider ways to post a public-facing report about substantiated cases. We recommend that a University Task Force be established to examine ways to make the findings of substantiated cases more readily available without having to submit a public-records request, and this should be done while keeping within the constraints outlined in Robyn Blank\u2019s 20 memorandum. There are several arguments in favor of such a site. Posting this information would allow the University to \u201cget out in front\u201d of a situation rather than having to respond to media reports. Providing the information from a centralized office also would have the advantage of relieving individual deans/chairs of the burden of informing units, an area where communications have broken down in the past. Such a site also ensures that colleagues and students who might work with respondent are aware of the situation. Finally, doing so would reduce the need for interested parties to file public records requests in order to gather information about the cases. 16. We recommend that the University create a website, updated annually, indicating the number of complaints received, number of investigations completed, and number of investigations found substantiated and unsubstantiated. Presenting such data would reassure the University community and others that action is taken on all complaints. It would also give some sense of the prevalence of harassment. 17. We recommend that public records requests for case reports be responded to more promptly. The Committee encountered significant time lags in obtaining some reports. Requests filed for two different reports took 2.5 and 4.5 months to be fulfilled. The two most recent requests from the Task Force were responded to in 1-2 days. 18. We recommend taking whatever action is possible to apprise future employers about the harassing behavior of a respondent once they have left FSU. Committee members appreciate that alerts all federal funding agencies with which the respondent has dealings of accusations of harassment and outcomes of investigations. The Committee also recognizes that it is difficult to alert potential employers other than via a \u201cwhisper network,\u201d since potential employers number in the thousands. We note, however, that all employees are required to be evaluated annually for the preceding calendar year\u2019s activity. These reports become part of the employee\u2019s permanent file, which potential employers can request as they go about due diligence. Thus, even in the event of separation from the University, the annual evaluation could explain the reasons for a negative evaluation. 19. We recommend that an academic authority, either the Provost or the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement, be more clearly identified as the \u201cgo to person\u201d in cases where an affected party believes that their claims have not been heard. While current practice identifies these role incumbents as serving this function, the Task Force recommends making their commitment more explicit. The former Dean of the College of Social Sciences, David Rasmussen, failed to act for many years on reports, including from the Chair, regarding Dr. Feiock\u2019s harassing behavior. The Committee believes that the KnowMore website should make it clear that in cases where an affected party feels the case is being blocked at a 21 lower level that they are welcome to approach the Provost or the Vice President of Faculty Development and Advancement for redress. 20. We recommend that the University\u2019s mandatory sexual harassment training be readily available for those who want a refresher course. The KnowMore website link to training goes to a presentation geared to students, ( Finding the Sexual Harassment Training module designed for employees turns out to be a daunting task. After going to my.fsu.edu, one clicks the \u201cHR\u201d icon, selects \u201cLearning and Development,\u201d selects \u201cRequest Training Enrollment\u201d from the menu. Then the employee selects \u201cSearch by Course Name\u201d and types in a term likely to work, in this case \u201cSexual,\u201d and hits \u201cSearch.\u201d In the table that appears, in the row labelled. \"NonDiscrimin/Sexual Misconduct,\u201d they would click on \u201cView Available Sessions,\u201d and from there click on the session named \u201c3000 person can then enroll and wait up to two hours for Omni and Canvas to synch direct link to the training module from a website devoted to sexual harassment would be an improvement. 21. We recommend that the University devote resources to training principles aligned with those put forth by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Math. The report (2018) concludes that positive effects were mostly likely when training included the following elements: \u2022 lasted more than 4 hours \u2022 was conducted face-to-face \u2022 included active participation with other trainees on interdependent tasks \u2022 was customized for the audience, and \u2022 was conducted by a supervisor or external expert. We would add that the training also should be culturally competent and sensitive to differences in various cultural and linguistic contexts and to the experiences of people with diverse sexual and gender identities. The University\u2019s existing Green Dot bystander-intervention program incorporates many of these elements and might serve as a model for meeting these suggestions. The program is available to faculty, staff, and students task force member attended a three-hour workshop and believed that some of the principles\u2014which align with those endorsed by the NASEM\u2014 would apply to faculty trainings, as well. He was impressed with the quality of the training, particularly with how well small groups worked together to respond to the scenarios presented. The session was participatory. Trainees gathered in groups of six or eight and heard live presentations of cases, after which the groups brainstormed interventions. The Task Force member found the training effective for several reasons: a) it was participatory, b) group dialogue uncovered aspects of cases that individuals might have overlooked, c) the cases presented were nuanced, which generated thoughtful dialogue, and d) it was sensitive to varied cultural contexts, such as faculty and students coming from international settings and those 22 communicating in English as a second language (although it did not address the experiences of people with diverse sexual and gender identities). At the present time requires employees to complete an online training course, and units may also request training presentations, which in non-pandemic times are delivered face-to-face. We note that online training, while efficient, is generally less effective than live training 2018). And we also note that the Task Force has heard reports that HR\u2019s live presentations tend to be generic and not particularly geared to the situations confronted by faculty and students. The Task Force recognizes the considerable resources that adopting the recommendations would require. Nevertheless, on an issue that is so vitally important, where the lives of vulnerable populations on the line, such resource allocation is appropriate. Conclusions The sexual harassment investigation and determination process should place the health and well- being of the people involved first and foremost. The reputation of the institution should be a secondary consideration. Protecting victims and reducing their number is key, while keeping in mind that the accused party is not guilty until an investigatory process determines that a claim is substantiated. We believe that is committed to the protection of all members of the community, and we hope that the Task Force\u2019s findings about what does and does not work and the recommendations for improvements are useful in attaining that goal. We begin with the observation that the investigation, treatment of affected parties, and responsiveness to requests for information have improved dramatically over the past 30 years task facing the University now is to assure faculty, staff and students\u2014and affected parties, in particular\u2014that present-day complaints will be handled in a way that encourages confidence in the process. The purpose of the Task Force was to look into recent sexual harassment cases with an eye to understanding what went wrong and how could improve existing processes. The Faculty Senate President asked the Task Force to pay special attention to possible problems in reporting up the chain, openness and transparency, the timeliness of administrative action and the reporting of findings. Longer term specific goals include determining ways to reduce the number of incidents, reduce victims\u2019 suffering, suggest improvements to the complaint-reporting process, clarifying how to ensure community members understand what constitutes unacceptable behavior, and set up a system for ascertaining the frequency of complaints and their resolution. The Task Force gathered information from national reports regarding the pervasiveness of the problem, the groups most likely to be affected by it and the groups most likely to engage in it, and the consequences for individuals. We then gathered data on several recent cases at FSU. In doing so, we turned to investigative reports gained via public-records requests, newspaper coverage, examination of policies and websites, and extensive interviews with administrators, faculty, and students. Based on 23 these data, we arrived at a set of recommendations that we believe will make a safer haven for faculty, staff, and students. They can be summarized as follows. We believe that communication can be improved on a number of dimensions. The 50-page Sexual Misconduct Policy is the sole document laying out procedures. It is comprehensive but difficult for a layperson to follow, since it covers separate procedures for three different groups (students, faculty, FSU-School faculty) and because it is, understandably, written legalistically. We suggest adding a flow chart describing the investigative process, with hyperlinks to various sections of the Sexual Misconduct Policy. The flow chart could also be used when counseling affected parties face-to-face about their options, as hearing options is complemented by seeing them written out. Other communication improvements entail advertising actions the University already engages in, for example, the practice of guaranteeing continued funding and immediate remedies for a student complainant and the practice of having the right to turn to the Provost or the of Faculty Development and Advancement if an affected party believes a complaint is not being followed through on at lower levels. It is one thing to have procedures in place and another to ensure that people are aware of them. This matters, as it is likely to increase reporting rates. Effective training is key to any organizational change, and at the most minimal level, the existing online training module could be more easily accessible, and at the maximal level, training could be revamped in accordance with the guidelines that recommend that training last several hours, be conducted face-to-face, include active participation, be customized for the audience, and be conducted by a supervisor or external expert. The Task Force would like to see greater transparency when an investigation concludes that charges were substantiated, although we acknowledge the difficulty in doing so, as laid out in Robyn Blank\u2019s (2021) memorandum. Our investigation showed that results are unattainable except by public-records requests and that communication about a case to faculty, staff, and students in a unit was not always forthcoming. Many involved parties expressed frustration at having to turn to newspaper accounts to gain information. To the extent possible, efforts should be undertaken to not leave the University community in the dark about substantiated complaints. The Task Force is concerned that responding parties found to have violated the Sexual Misconduct Policy can seemingly find other employment with an employer unaware of their misconduct, and we would like to see steps taken\u2014most obviously including substantiated claims in personnel records\u2014so that such information is readily available when an employer vets a potential hire. Including such information in a personnel file might entail changing the current practice wherein a finding is simply not reached if the responding party leaves finding, with caveats about how the responding party did not respond, could be reached in such cases, making it more likely that a potential employer will see the information. Finally, the creation of a website regularly updated with the number of complaints received, number of investigations completed, and number of investigations found substantiated and unsubstantiated would reassure the University community and others that action is taken on all complaints. Besides offering some sense of the prevalence of harassment, such a site would also reassure members of the University community that action is taken on all complaints. 24 In sum, the Task Force concludes that the process has greatly improved in recent years, and we look forward to further improvements in the future. References Blank, Robyn. 2021. \u201cInquiry outcome for review of communication procedures in sexual misconduct cases.\u201d Memorandum to Dr. Eric Chicken Board of Trustees, August 6. Office of Compliance and Ethics, Florida State University. [Available on Faculty Senate website.] Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., & Woods, K. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among black and white women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 347-361. Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Harps, S., Townsend, R., Thomas, G., . . . Madden, K. (2019). Report on the campus climate survey on sexual assault and misconduct. The Association of American Universities, Westat, Rockville, Maryland. Retrieved from 2019.pdf. Clancy, K. B., Lee, K. M., Rodgers, E. M., & Richey, C. (2017). Double jeopardy in astronomy and planetary science: Women of color face greater risks of gendered and racial harassment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 122(7), 1610-1623. doi: Cortina, L. M. (2004). Hispanic perspectives on sexual harassment and social support. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 30(5), 570-584. Cortina, L. M., Swan, S., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Waldo, C. (1998). Sexual harassment and assault: Chilling the climate for women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 419-441. doi: Dobson, B. (2021, March 23, 2021, updated March 24, 2021). No place in our community\u2019 for sexual misconduct dean tells faculty following controversy. Tallahassee Democrat. Retrieved from harassment-wont-tolerated-florida-state/6968733002/. Accessed on March 9, 2022 Espinoza, M., & Hsiehchen, D. (2020). Characteristics of faculty accused of academic sexual misconduct in the biomedical and health sciences. JAMA, 323(15), 1503-1505. doi: Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 192- 208. doi: Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work\u2010 related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta\u2010analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 607-631. doi: Konik, J., & Cortina, L. M. (2008). Policing gender at work: Intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 313-337. doi: Libarkin, J. (2019). Academic Sexual Misconduct Database. n.d. misconduct-database.org 25 Morgan, L. (2021, March 14, 2021 ). Longtime prof resigned in sexual misconduct case: \u2018There is a huge sense of disgust over the allegations\u2019 Florida Phoenix. Retrieved from case-there-is-a-huge-sense-of-disgust-over-the-allegations/. Accessed on March 9, 2022 NASEM. (2018). Sexual harassment of women: climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: Swartout, K. (2018). University of Texas Climate Survey: Report on the University of Texas System Campus Climate Survey. In P. A. Johnson, S. E. Widnakk, & F. F. Benya (Eds.), Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering and medicine (pp. 275-292). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. No date. and Vagins, D. J., & Gatta, M. (2019). Limiting Our Livelihoods: The Cumulative Impact of Sexual Harassment on Women's Careers. American Association of University Women. Wood, T. (2021, November 16, 2021). Professor fired from for sexual misconduct now teaching online at UWF. Pensacola News Journal Retrieved from misconduct-now-teaching-online-uwf/8636448002/. Accessed on March 9, 2022"} |
7,378 | Jerome A. Cerny | Indiana State University | [
"7378_101.pdf",
"7378_102.pdf",
"7378_103.pdf",
"7378_104.pdf"
] | {"7378_101.pdf": "WTHR.com is the news leader for Indianapolis and Central Indiana. Get the best news, weather, sports and traffic information from Channel 13. 61076_G David MacAnally/Eyewitness News Terre Haute, October 29 - On university campuses, human sexuality is a topic. Indiana University has one of the world's best known sex research institutes. In Terre Haute, at Indiana State, there are questions about a now defunct sex research lab run by former professor and psychologist Jerome Cerny. Attorney General suspends sex researcher's license Author: wthr.com Published: 12:00 October 30, 2003 Updated: 7:21 August 26, 2016 13News Top Stories | 9 a.m update, Feb. 22, 2025 Ad 1 of 1 Ad 1 of 1 2/22/25, 8:30 Attorney General suspends sex researcher's license | wthr.com 1/3 The Indiana Attorney General has suspended his license. \"We felt that Dr. Cerny represented a clear and immediate danger to the public heath and safety become of the sexual allegations levied against him,\" said Deputy Indiana Attorney General Barclay Wong. Professor Cerny was studying human sexual response in his male students but, according to civil lawsuits and state investigators, he stepped way over the line. He basically abuses his role as a supervisor and researcher towards these students,\" said Wong.\"The allegations are of both a physical and verbal nature.\" He allegedly touched the genitals of student subjects as he attached them to diagnostic machines. Even unwanted touching and grabbing in the hallways. According to Wong, most of the people that Dr. Cerny molested were not official research participants. No consent forms had been signed. Cerny left Indiana State last year. He and the university now face civil suits. War Thunder | Sponsored Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now Camper Van Deals | Search ads | Sponsored Crossout | Sponsored Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to \u2026 Play Now 2/22/25, 8:30 Attorney General suspends sex researcher's license | wthr.com 2/3 War Thunder | Sponsored Join new Free to Play War Thunder Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now ARTICLE... 2/22/25, 8:30 Attorney General suspends sex researcher's license | wthr.com 3/3", "7378_102.pdf": "Former researcher under scrutiny Ex-Kinsey Institute employee accused of sexual molestation By Adam Aasen Nov 18, 2003 1:00 am former Indiana State University professor and researcher at the Kinsey Institute may have his psychologist license revoked for allegedly sexually harassing his research subjects.\\nThis summer, four students filed a complaint with the Indiana attorney general's office, alleging professor Jerome A. Cerny, 59, inappropriately touched their genitalia and made sexual comments during research. The complaints contain four counts of inappropriate conduct between September 1994 and June 2002. \\nCerny will defend his license in front of the Indiana State Psychology Board at a hearing Nov. 21. \\nThe Board suspended his license in an emergency session May 16. \\nISU closed Cerny's lab in 1996 following two similar student accusations. From September 1998 to August 1999, Cerny went on sabbatical where he did research on psychophysiological processes of sexual behavior at the Kinsey Institute.\\nJennifer Bass, spokesperson for Kinsey, said no one was aware of any past complaints against Cerny when he was accepted to the Institute. She said there were no complaints made during his time at the Kinsey Institute.\\nMichael Morse, an student from 1992 to 1997, discussed his contact with Cerny in 1996.\\nMorse, a psychology major, said he was eager to be a research subject to add to his resume. He showed up at Cerny's lab, but was turned down because he didn't meet the criteria.\\nIn 1997, Cerny allegedly approached Morse, then a senior, and asked if he was still interested in being a subject. Morse said it was typical of his style of recruitment. \\nMost of the subjects were enrolled in his courses and were not paid. Instead, they received \"massive amounts\" of extra credit -- a half-hour in the laboratory in exchange for almost a grade higher in some cases, Morse said.\\nMorse said he was told by Cerny, both verbally and in a written consent form, that his genitals would only be viewed once during the ejaculatory latency research. Morse said Cerny asked This website uses cookies Preferences Accept 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 1/9 him to masturbate to a pornographic movie while he talked to him over an intercom. For almost three hours, Morse unsuccessfully tried to ejaculate wearing the plethysmograph. Cerny then told him to use his hand and then Morse ejaculated. Cerny then allegedly grabbed Morse's penis.\\nDuring the procedure, Morse said Cerny touched his penis at least eight times during a two-day period, for \"vague and ambiguous reasons.\"\\nMorse said he felt uncomfortable, but didn't say anything at that moment.\\n didn't even realize that anything was wrong until he tickled my sides at the water fountain outside of class,\" he said. \"Then realized something terribly wrong went on.\"\\nCerny did not wish to comment when called at his home Monday night.\\nIn the complaints, the counts detail Cerny's relationship with students, including accusations Cerny massaging, pinching and tickling. The complaints also claim Cerny suggested that he stay in the room with the subjects and watch them masturbate. In his lab, students also claim Cerny asked them to help him design a more ergonomic chair. One student agreed and took his pants off so Cerny could trace his legs, buttocks and testicles on paper.\\nShelly Mazo, director of the Indiana State Psychology Board, said a board of seven members will vote on whether or not to revoke Cerny's license.\\nBass said regardless of the outcome of Cerny's hearing, situations like these are always detrimental to the sexual research field.\\n\"Doing sex research is a very, very sensitive topic,\" she said. \"We need to provide more protections for people involved, both researchers and subjects.\"\\nBass said researchers should never touch a subject or be in the room when they are performing personal sexual acts. Most of all, she said subjects need to know what will actually occur in the study and their rights to privacy.\\n\"Most subjects don't know they can back out at any time,\" she said\\nMorse said he felt the same way.\\n was just in terror of him,\" he said literally felt that could not get out of there unless finished the project. It had nothing to do with science.\" \\nThe public hearing will begin at 9:15 p.m., Friday at the Indiana Government Center South, Room 1, in Indianapolis. \\n-- Contact campus editor Adam Aasen at [email protected]. Around the Web Find Useful Knowledge Ethereal Search Engine Nine Kinds of Ancestors You Could Find on Your Family Tree Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Changes This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 2/9 Fear of God founder surprised by Indiana basketball\u2019s decision to ditch uniforms Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness Four Ways Food Banks Are Feeding Kids Right Now Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro Get Mortgage Advice Close to Home Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? How Long Should Keep My Car? This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 3/9 Michigan Dusty May signs contract extension amid Indiana men\u2019s basketball speculation This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 4/9 women's basketball defeats Ohio State 71-61 This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 5/9 This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 6/9 Indiana basketball programs won\u2019t wear Fear of God uniforms in \u2018any upcoming games nagging guilt\u2019: Trombonist shares inappropriate interaction with Jacobs professor Indiana is nearing universal school choice. Critics decry \u2018slow bleed\u2019 on public education What\u2019s on the agenda for the upcoming Board of Trustees meeting? What would red light and speed cameras mean for traffic safety in Bloomington? This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 7/9 Get updates on the Daily Rundown. See the day's top headlines and weekly recaps every Friday UP! This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 8/9 Indiana Daily Student 812-855-0763 [email protected] 601 E. Kirkwood Ave., Bloomington 47405-7108 About Us Staff List Contact Us Employment FAQs Advertising Privacy Terms Classifieds Events Health Religious Powered by Solutions by The State News All Content \u00a9 2025 Indiana Daily Student This website uses cookies 2/22/25, 8:30 Former researcher under scrutiny - Indiana Daily Student 9/9", "7378_104.pdf": "1 J. JONES, Plaintiff, vs and CERNY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) 2:03-cv-325 In an Amended Complaint filed on February 3, 2004, Cory Jones (\u201cJones\u201d) named Indiana State University (\u201cISU\u201d) as defendant for counts and Dr. Jerome Cerny (\u201cCerny\u201d) as defendant for counts III-IX. On December 1, 2004, Cerny moved to sever claims against ISU. The court, finding that the current joinder of claims is not prejudicial to Cerny and that the severance of claims would cause unnecessary expense and delay Cerny\u2019s Motion for Separate Trials. I. Background The following facts are alleged by plaintiff Cory Jones in his Amended Complaint: Cerny, during times relevant to the claim, was a Professor of Psychology at and accordingly, an employee of ISU. At the end of the fall semester of 1999, Cerny met Jones after being appointed as his supervisor. Soon after, Cerny began inquiring into Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> 1The court assumes from context that these sexual experiments were in some way related to Cerny\u2019s academic work. 2Jones did not specify the date upon which this event occurred. 2 Jones\u2019s sex life. In the spring of 2002, Cerny again inquired into Jones\u2019s sex life and touched Jones inappropriately on several occasions. Subsequently, Cerny learned that Jones was facing possible disciplinary action for disrespecting another professor and offered to assist Jones with that problem. In conjunction, Cerny convinced Jones to participate in one of his sexual experiments.1 Cerny asked Jones to remove his pants and sit naked on a paper on a chair for the stated purpose of designing a new ergonomic chair.2 Cerny drew an outline around Jones\u2019s legs, buttocks, and testicles. On June 7, 2002, Cerny coerced Jones to engage in another sexual experiment; Cerny took Jones to his lab and asked him to disrobe. Cerny explained that the sexual experiment would be private and that Jones could use the intercom system if he became uncomfortable with the situation. Then, Cerny instructed Jones to attach a rubber band and wire to the base of his penis and to put a vibrator tube over the penis to complete a sexual experiment. While Jones was performing the instructed experiment, Cerny entered the room, touched Jones, and remained in the room for the duration of the experiment. In addition, Cerny made comments to Jones about his penis and testicles. Prior to the incident with Jones, the Board of Trustees (\u201cthe Board\u201d) had received several complaints from students about Cerny\u2019s sexual misconduct. According to Jones, the Board had actual knowledge of Cerny\u2019s sexual experiments with students as Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> 3 early as 1997. Jones alleges nine counts arising from these facts: Count is an action against the Board under Title of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 (\u201cTitle IX\u201d). Count is an action against the Board of Trustees under Indiana state law for negligent retention, negligent supervision, negligence, and respondeat superior. The remaining counts are against Cerny for violation of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983, assault and battery, negligence, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. II. Standard for Separate Trials Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(b) states: \u201c[t]he court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third- party claim, or any separate issue . . . .\u201d Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b). Only one of these criteria need be satisfied for a court to order a separate trial. Berry v. Deloney, 28 F.3d 604, 610 (7th Cir. 1994). However, before ordering separate trials, the district court must be satisfied that separation will not unfairly prejudice the non-moving party. Houseman v. U.S. Aviation Underwriters, 171 F.3d 1117, 1121 (7th Cir. 1999) (citing Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, 11 F.3d 957, 964 (10th Cir.1993)). Furthermore, the court should weigh the cost to the parties and the judicial system of having to conduct two or more trials instead of one against the prejudice avoided by the moving party. Avitia v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Inc., 49 F.3d 1219, 1224 (7th Cir. 1995). This process of Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> 4 weighing these gains against losses is committed to the discretion of the district judge. Id. Other district courts within the Seventh Circuit have refused to sever claims when the alleged prejudicial evidence would probably be allowed in both trials. McCleland v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 1995 374185 at *2 (N.D. Ill. 1995). In McCleland, the Court held that \u201cin light of the likelihood that each plaintiff would be able to testify in the other\u2019s trials . . . granting separate trials would result in a waste of judicial resources.\u201d Id. III. Analysis Cerny contends that evidence admissible in counts against would not be admissible against him in counts III-IX. Specifically, Cerny maintains that the following would normally be inadmissible to prove liability for counts III-IX: evidence of his prior alleged misconduct involving students from 1981-2001, investigative reports stemming from prior alleged misconduct, memoranda among department heads at ISU, and testimony of student witnesses in actions against Cerny from 1981-1998. According to Cerny, allowing this evidence to be considered in counts would be prejudicial, and to avoid such prejudice, the counts should be tried separately. The court disagrees. Given the limited amount of discovery completed, the court cannot conclude that evidence regarding Cerny\u2019s prior alleged misconduct is inadmissible. Further, the court cannot say that such evidence, if admissible, would be unduly prejudicial. In the present case, the court finds it premature to consider whether evidence of Cerny\u2019s prior alleged misconduct and intra-organizational communications within Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> 5 would be admissible in counts III-IX. However, the court notes that under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 415, where a defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant\u2019s commission of another offense of sexual assault is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant. Fed. R. Evid. 413, 415. Thus, the court has reason to believe that evidence regarding Cerny\u2019s past would be admissible to prove certain elements of the causes of action in counts III-IX. Even if the evidence would be inadmissible for proof in counts if the counts were separated, the court cannot say that separate trials would be warranted in the present case. With respect to the criteria in Rule 42(b), separate trials would not further convenience or be \u201cconducive to expedition and economy.\u201d The remaining criteria upon which trials could be separated is prejudice. Without a more thorough understanding of the evidence regarding Cerny\u2019s prior alleged misconduct, the court cannot say that it would be prejudicial. Moreover, the court cannot say that prejudice, if present, would outweigh the substantial costs to Jones and the judicial system of holding separate trials. For instance, if Jones must admit the testimony of the same witnesses and the same documents in two trials, both he and the court will incur unnecessary costs and duplication of effort. In his motion, Cerny suggested that most of these costs could be avoided by joining counts with Morse v. Board of Trustees of Indiana State University at Terre Haute, Case Number 2:04-cv-00221-LGM-WGH. Since Morse was dismissed, the seemingly cost-effective joinder of counts is no longer possible. Lastly, the court finds that a limiting instruction and a motion in limine would be Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> 6 an effective way to minimize prejudice in this case. In sum, the court has reason to believe that the evidence upon which Cerny\u2019s motion is based might be admissible with respect to counts III-IX; separation based on prejudice would be hollow under those circumstances. Even if keeping counts joined would result in the admission of evidence otherwise inadmissible for counts III-IX, the court cannot say that such evidence is unduly prejudicial. Finally, even if the evidence were prejudicial, the court doubts that the prejudice would outweigh the burden placed upon the plaintiff and the judicial system. III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the court Cerny\u2019s Motion for Separate Trials this 21st day of June 2005. ______________________________ United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Electronic Copies to: Philip C. Eckert [email protected] John F. Ittenbach Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: <pageID> _______________________________ United States District Court Southern District of Indiana 7 [email protected] James S. Stephenson [email protected] Wayne E. Uhl [email protected] Case 2:03-cv-00325 Document 53 Filed 06/21/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: <pageID>"} |
7,628 | Sujit Choudhry | University of California – Berkeley | [
"7628_101.pdf",
"7628_102.pdf",
"7628_103.pdf",
"7628_104.pdf",
"7628_105.pdf",
"7628_106.pdf",
"7628_107.pdf"
] | {"7628_101.pdf": "Berkeley law dean Sujit Choudhry resigns after sex harassment suit By Michael Pearson 3 minute read \u00b7 Updated 12:35 EST, Fri March 11, 2016 (CNN) \u2014 University of California at Berkeley law school dean Sujit Choudhry has resigned amid an uproar over the school\u2019s handling of sexual harassment claims against him Berkely placed Sujit Choudhry on leave Wednesday and he resigned a day later, but says he will defend himself against the allegations 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 1/8 an uproar over the school s handling of sexual harassment claims against him. Administrators said Thursday that they were wrong in not removing Choudhry following a July 2015 report substantiating the claims. Choudhry now becomes the second Berkeley law dean forced out by sex harassment claims since 2002, and the second prominent faculty member accused of such conduct in the last year. \u201cWe can and must do better as a campus administration,\u201d Chancellor Nicholas Dirks and Provost Claude Steele said in a statement. \u201cWe must move in the direction of stronger sanctions, and in doing this we want and need the broad input of the campus community.\u201d Choudhry\u2019s administrative assistant, Tyann Sorrell, complained of nearly daily sexual harassment by Choudhry involving \u201crude and demeaning\u201d conduct and unwanted kissing, hugging and other physical conduct, according to a report provided by the school. In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Alameda County Superior Court, she said the conduct began soon after Choudhry took over as dean in July 2014. It started, she said, with \u201cbear hugs\u201d but soon progressed to kissing and other unwanted contact. \u201cInvariably, in response to Choudhry\u2019s hugs she would keep her arms at her sides and make her body go limp until she thought he was done,\u201d according to the lawsuit. \u201cThen, so as not to upset him, she would politely push him off. In response to his kisses she would freeze and try to pretend it did not happen.\u201d In the lawsuit, Sorrell said she repeatedly brought the issue up to superiors, but school officials failed to act to stop the conduct. Probe finds merit to sex harassment claims The lawsuit came seven months after a campus investigation found merit to Sorrell\u2019s claims, saying Choudhry has engaged in a daily pattern of \u201cunwelcome conduct of a sexual nature\u201d that personally and professionally affected the assistant and violated school policy. According to the report, Choudhry acknowledged some of the behaviors, but said they occurred less frequently than Sorrell claimed. At the time, Steele docked Choudhry\u2019s pay by 10%, required him to undergo counseling and to apologize to his assistant. But he allowed the dean to go on leading the prestigious law school, considered one of the best in the nation. 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 2/8 After Sorrell filed the lawsuit, the university placed the dean on indefinite leave Wednesday day later, the school announced he had stepped aside. \u201cWe believe the dean\u2019s resignation is an outcome in the best interests of Berkeley Law and the university as a whole,\u201d Dirks and Steele wrote. \u201cAt the same time we are under no illusion that a resignation could or even should bring this matter and broader, related issues to a close.\u201d Berkeley protects perpetrators, students claim Student leaders said Thursday that they were disgusted by what had happened. \u201cThis incident highlights Berkeley\u2019s history of insulating those who perpetuate sexual violence against members of our community and the culture that allows them to thrive,\u201d Coalition For Diversity Co-Chair Kyneshawau Hurd and student association member Sloan Patrice Whiteside said in an open letter to school officials. In a statement following the leave announcement but before his resignation, Choudhry said he agreed to step aside to prevent the lawsuit from becoming a distraction to the school. \u201cWhile disagree with the plaintiff\u2019s claims and allegations, and will defend against them am unfortunately unable to comment on the substance of the lawsuit,\u201d he said in a statement provided by the school. \u201cHowever can say that cooperated fully with, and take extremely seriously, the University\u2019s confidential investigation into this matter and ensuing sanction will continue to cooperate fully with the University as matters unfold.\u201d Choudhry remains a member of the faculty. It is unclear whether he will retain that position. In 2002, John Dwyer was forced to resign from his post as dean of the Berkeley law school over sexual harassment allegations involving a former student, according to the school. Last year, an astronomy professor at the school resigned following disclosure of sexual harassment claims involving him. Up next Sean \u2018Diddy\u2019 Combs moves to dismiss federal charge, arguing statute\u2019s \u2018racist origins\u2019 2 minute read i i f i i i i 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 3/8 Senior prosecutor quit after being told to investigate Biden climate spending 5 minute read Supreme Court rules that government watchdog fired by Trump may temporarily remain on the job 5 minute read What to know about Ed Martin, the right-wing activist Trump tapped to be DC\u2019s top prosecutor 8 minute read Trump\u2019s antisemitism order leaves colleges uncertain and bracing for crackdown 7 minute read Most read 1 Trump administration fires top general and Navy chief in unprecedented purge of military leadership 2 Recording reveals new details on controversial employee 3 Trump wants to shake up the Postal Service. Here\u2019s what it\u2019ll mean for your deliveries. 4 From bashing Zelensky to lobbying senators, Vance settles in as Trump\u2019s No. 2 5 Supreme Court rules that government watchdog fired by Trump may temporarily remain on the job 6 Human remains returned by Hamas to Israel confirmed as those of former hostage Shiri Bibas 7 Pentagon announces it plans to fire 5-8% of civilian workforce 8 Even for an administrative hearing, Luigi Mangione draws crowds at New York City courthouse 9 Dow tumbles more than 700 points as inflation and tariff fears mount 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 4/8 10 Yankees stun baseball world with new facial hair policy Sean \u2018Diddy\u2019 Combs moves to dismiss federal charge, arguing statute\u2019s \u2018racist ... Senior prosecutor quit after being told to investigate Biden climate spending Supreme Court rules that government watchdog fired by Trump may Trump administration fires top general and Navy chief in unprecedented ... Recording reveals new details on controversial employee Trump wants to shake up the Postal Service. Here\u2019s what it\u2019ll mean for your ... 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 5/8 Sign in World Politics Business Markets Health Entertainment Tech Style Travel Sports Science Climate Weather Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Features Watch Listen Search CNN... Live Listen Watch 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 6/8 About Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Ad Choices Accessibility About Newsletters Transcripts \u00a9 2025 Cable News Network Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All Rights Reserved Sans \u2122 & \u00a9 2016 Cable News Network 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 7/8 2/22/25, 8:30 Sujit Choudhry resigns Berkeley law dean after sex harassment claims 8/8", "7628_102.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal Nov 9, 2016 Case No. 16-cv-05281 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2016) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Delegate legal research to CoCounsel, your new legal assistant. Try CoCounsel free Case No. 16-cv-05281 11-09-2016 CHOUDHRY, Plaintiff, v CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants United States District Judge Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Summaries Case details 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/16 Plaintiff Sujit Choudhry seeks to enjoin pending disciplinary proceedings initiated by the University of California (\"the university\" or \"UC\") in response to allegations of sexual harassment. Choudhry argues that the proceedings violate his constitutional rights because they are based on the same complaint that the university already investigated and resolved last year. Regardless of how history may judge the manner in which the university has handled this case, federal intervention at this stage is not warranted. The disciplinary process is an ongoing state judicial proceeding that implicates important state interests and offers adequate opportunities for Choudhry to raise his constitutional challenges. Abstention is proper under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Choudhry's motion therefore must be denied Choudhry became dean of the Berkeley School of Law (\"Berkeley Law\") in June 2014. In March 2015, Tyann Sorrell, his executive assistant, complained that Choudhry's verbal and physical behavior upset and distressed her. Sorrell's complaint triggered an investigation into Choudhry's conduct. The UC's Office for Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination (\"OPHD\") interviewed Sorrell, Choudhry, and other witnesses, reviewed documentary evidence, *2 and compiled a report. The concluded that Choudhry violated the sexual harassment provisions of the Policy on Sexual Harassment and Sexual Violence and submitted its report to Executive Vice Chancellor Claude Steele for review. After discussing the report with other administrators, Steele reduced Choudhry's salary, required Choudhry to apologize to Sorrell and to attend training on appropriate behavior, and announced an intent to monitor Choudhry's conduct. On July 30, 2015, Steele communicated his decision by letter to Choudhry and indicated that he could be subject to further disciplinary action, \"up to and including termination as Dean,\" if he violated the university's policy again. Choudhry Decl., Ex. 16. Choudhry complied with Steele's plan of action and continued as dean. 2 On March 8, 2016, Sorrell filed a law suit against Choudhry and the university alleging sexual harassment and retaliation. Shortly thereafter, 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/16 Choudhry offered to resign as dean which Steele accepted. On March 10, 2016, Steele and Chancellor Nicholas Dirks announced Choudhry's resignation in a statement to the Berkeley Law community. They said: \"we are under no illusion that a resignation could or even should bring this matter and broader, related issues to a close\" and \"we must move in the direction of stronger sanctions.\" Reply at 7 President Janet Napolitano also responded publicly to Sorrell's suit. On March 9, 2016, the Sacramento Bee published an editorial regarding the allegations against Choudhry and astronomy professor Geoff Marcy, who was reportedly \"forced to step down [due to] charges of serial groping.\" Mehta Decl., Ex. 2. The editorial quotes Napolitano as saying deans are normally disciplined at the campus level,\" but \"[p]eople ought to be able to come to work without being groped, as a minimal standard.\" Id. On March 11, 2016, Napolitano wrote to Dirks to ask that he institute disciplinary proceedings against Choudhry \"through the Privilege and Tenure process\" and ensure that Choudhry not return to campus for the remainder of the term. Id., Ex. 1. On March 15, 2016, Vice Provost for Faculty Janet Broughton notified Choudhry that the report had been referred to her for assessment under the Faculty Code of Conduct, and that she would be appointing one or two faculty members to investigate possible violations of the code. At the close of that investigation, around September 15, 2016, the university filed disciplinary *3 charges which were referred to the Academic Senate Committee on Privilege and Tenure. 3 The disciplinary charges are pending. Pursuant to Academic Senate Bylaw 336, the Privilege and Tenure Committee will appoint a Hearing Committee, consisting of at least three members\u2014not including any members who cannot \"objective[ly] consider[]\" the case\u2014to review the charges, hear the evidence and arguments, and make a recommendation to the Chancellor. Mehta Decl., Ex.14 (\"Hearing Committee members shall disclose to the Hearing Committee any circumstances that may interfere with their objective consideration of the case and recuse themselves as appropriate.\") Prior to the formal hearing, the chair of the Hearing Committee will schedule a conference for both sides to exchange a list of witnesses and 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/16 copies of exhibits to be presented at the hearing. At the hearing, which will be recorded, \"each party shall have the right to be represented by counsel, to present its case by oral and documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.\" Id. The Hearing Committee \"may, upon an appropriate showing of need by any party or on its own initiative, request files and documents under the control of the administration.\" Id. At the hearing, \"the Chancellor or Chancellor's designee has the burden of proving the allegations by clear and convincing evidence.\" Id. If the Hearing Committee makes recommendations adverse to Choudhry, he will have a further opportunity, after the hearing, to request that the recommendations not be adopted. In the meantime, over the course of the spring and summer, both Steele and Dirks resigned from their posts, citing personal reasons. Then, in August 2016, Choudhry, through his counsel, informed the university that he would return to his office at Berkeley Law in the fall. On September 6, 2016, Choudhry published an open letter in the Daily Californian telling his side of the story. That day, there was a protest at the law school responding to Choudhry's letter and, two days later, Berkeley Law students, faculty, and staff members attended a town hall meeting to discuss the situation. In that meeting, Choudhry says, students accused him of committing sexual assault and labeled him a predator; sentiments which he claims the university administrators validated. On September 15, 2016 the university informed Choudhry that his office would be *4 moved from the main law school building to a different university building. 4 Choudhry remains a tenured faculty member. He is not currently scheduled to teach, but he has been assigned research, administrative, and service projects. He maintains an office on campus, although administrators have encouraged him to work remotely whenever possible. He did not receive summer funding, but he continues to receive his salary and administrative support. On September 15, 2016, Choudhry filed suit against the UC, under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 and 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e, claiming violations of his constitutional rights and racial discrimination. Choudhry alleges due process violations based on 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/16 deprivations of his property and liberty interests. Specifically, he claims a property interest in the finality guaranteed by Steele's July 2015 \"settlement\" and liberty interests in teaching and being free from unfair stigma. He also alleges violations of the equal protection clause and racial discrimination because he is of South Asian descent and other employees, who are not members of a protected class, \"have been found to have committed actual predatory conduct yet been treated more favorably.\" Comp. \u00b6 170.1 1 The amended complaint, filed while this motion was pending, also includes a claim for First Amendment violations Choudhry moves for a preliminary injunction to stop the university from completing the pending disciplinary proceedings. Such proceedings, Choudhry argues, will cause him further, irreparable harm if allowed to continue. In opposition, the university advances two arguments. First, it argues abstention is proper under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Second, it contends Choudhry has not established entitlement to an injunction. Because Younger abstention is appropriate, the second argument need not be addressed. A. Younger Abstention In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court held that federal courts sitting in equity cannot, absent exceptional circumstances, enjoin pending state criminal proceedings. 401 U.S. at 43-54. It later extended the Younger principle to civil enforcement actions \"akin to\" criminal proceedings, *5 Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 604 (1975), and to suits challenging \"the core of the administration of a State's judicial system.\" Juidice v. Vail, 430 U.S. 327, 335 (1977). In Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Association, the high court identified three factors that together warrant abstention: (1) \"an ongoing state judicial proceeding,\" (2) which \"implicate[s] important state interests,\" and (3) in which \"there [is] an adequate opportunity [] to raise constitutional challenges.\" 457 U.S. 423, 433- 434 (1982). For many years, lower courts treated these factors as the established test for Younger abstention. 5 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/16 In Sprint Communications Inc. v. Jacobs, \u2014 U.S. \u2014, 134 S.Ct. 584 (2013), the Supreme Court clarified that a court should only consider the Middlesex factors after it has established that a state proceeding fits within the Younger doctrine. Id. at 593 (\"Divorced from their quasi-criminal context, the three Middlesex conditions would extend Younger to virtually all parallel state and federal proceedings, at least where a party could identify a plausibly important state interest.\"). It held that Younger abstention is limited to the \"three exceptional categories\" of cases identified in New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of New Orleans (NOPSI), 491 U.S. 350, 367-68 (1989). Id. at 592. Those categories are: (1) \"parallel, pending state criminal proceeding[s],\" (2) \"state civil proceedings that are akin to criminal prosecutions,\" and (3) state civil proceedings that \"implicate a State's interest in enforcing the orders and judgments of its courts.\" Id. at 588. 1. Quasi-Criminal Proceedings The university argues that the proceedings against Choudhry are akin to criminal proceedings, and thus fit into the second category. Choudhry disagrees. He contends that the proceedings resemble more closely a private dispute resolution than a quasi-criminal enforcement action. Quasi-criminal proceedings have several distinguishing features. They \"are characteristically initiated to sanction the federal plaintiff, i.e., the party challenging the state action, for some wrongful act.\" Sprint, 134 S.Ct. at 592. \" [A] state actor is routinely a party to the state proceedings and often initiates the action.\" Id. Additionally, the proceedings often begin with internal investigations that \"culminat[e] in the filing of a formal complaint or charges.\" Id. *6 6 Comparing Sprint with Middlesex illustrates the scope of the second category. The Supreme Court found Younger applicable in the latter, but not in the former. In Sprint, a national telecommunications service provider submitted its fee dispute with a local telecommunications carrier to a state agency, the Iowa Utility Board (\"IUB\"). In Middlesex, a New Jersey state ethics committee initiated disciplinary proceedings against an attorney. The Supreme Court found the IUB's adjudicative authority in Sprint \"was invoked to settle a civil dispute between two private parties, not to sanction 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/16 Sprint for commission of a wrongful act.\" Id. at 593. By contrast, in Middlesex, the ethics committee proceedings were quasi-criminal because \"an investigation and formal complaint preceded the hearing, an agency of the State's Supreme Court initiated the hearing, and the purpose of the hearing was to determine whether the lawyer should be disciplined for his failure to meet the State's standards of professional conduct.\" Id.; see also Middlesex, 457 U.S. at 438 (Brennan, J., concurring in judgment) (noting the \"quasi-criminal nature of bar disciplinary proceedings\"). The proceedings bear the hallmarks of a quasi-criminal proceeding outlined in Sprint. The UC, a state institution, initiated the proceedings preliminary investigation preceded the filing of formal charges. The investigation was commenced to sanction Choudhry for alleged misconduct. Choudhry faces \u2014at the conclusion of the process\u2014the possibility of serious sanctions. See Baffert v. Cal. Horse Racing Bd. 332 F.3d 613 (9th Cir. 2003) (proceeding against trainer was quasi-criminal \"[b]ecause [his] license was at issue and could be suspended or revoked\"). Given these circumstances, the proceedings are indeed \"akin to a criminal prosecution.\" 2 2 Choudhry argues that the \"cannot make Younger applicable by characterizing [his] conduct as 'quasi-criminal.'\" Reply at 2, n.1. Yet, in evaluating whether a state proceeding is quasi-criminal, the Supreme Court has considered whether the civil proceedings are related to criminal laws. See, e.g., Huffman, 420 U.S. at 604 (describing the civil nuisance action as \"closely related to criminal statutes which prohibit the dissemination of obscene materials\"); Trainor v. Hernandez, 431 U.S. 434, 444 (1977) (pointing out that \"[t]he state authorities also had the option of vindicating these policies through criminal prosecutions\"). Courts have found similar disciplinary proceedings to warrant abstention. See Cameron v. Ariz. Bd. of Regents, 2008 4838710 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2008) (university faculty disciplinary proceedings); Sanchez v. Arizona Board of Regents, 2015 6956288 (D. Ariz. Nov. 10, 2015) *7 (university student disciplinary proceedings); Doe v. Hazard, 152 F. Supp. 3d 859, 865 (E.D. Ky. 2016) (same); Jackson v. Univ. of Ky., 2016 3951084 (E.D. Ky. July 20, 2016) (same); Williams v. Red Bank Bd. of Ed., 662 F.2d 1008, 1015 (3d Cir. 1981), overruled on other grounds by Schall v. Joyce, 885 F.2d 101, 108-109 (3d Cir. 1989) (disciplinary proceeding against public school teacher); Ingber v. 7 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/16 N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., 2014 2575780 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2014) (same). Choudhry claims these cases are inapposite because they were either decided before Sprint or they rely on pre-Sprint precedents. Most of the cases, however, rely on Middlesex. They analogize state-university and public school disciplinary proceedings to attorney discipline proceedings. See Cameron, at *3; Ingber, at *4; Doe, at 865. Sprint distinguished Middlesex and harmonized it\u2014it did not overrule the holding that state attorney discipline proceedings fit within the Younger doctrine. Primarily, Choudhry argues that the proceedings are not quasi-criminal because the is not \"exercising a 'regulatory power' to revoke [his] license to practice or teach law, but is attempting to alter its own employment relationship with him.\" Reply at 3. In support, he relies on ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 754 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2014). There, a nurse staffing service, ReadyLink, purchased workers' compensation insurance from the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). During an audit found ReadyLink had failed to disclose certain payroll payments, so it billed ReadyLink for an additional premium. ReadyLink appealed that decision to the California Department of Insurance and an administrative law judge approved SCIF's premium calculation. ReadyLink then petitioned for a writ of administrative mandamus in state court and also filed a complaint against in federal court. The Ninth Circuit found that the state proceeding \"plainly was not a civil enforcement proceeding\"\u2014noting that \"SCIF, acting as a private party, audited and billed ReadyLink for its yearly premium\" and \"ReadyLink, a private party, requested agency review of that decision.\" Id. at 760. It reasoned that, \"[i]f the mere 'initiation' of a judicial or quasi-judicial administrative proceeding were an act of civil enforcement, Younger would extend to every case in which a state judicial officer resolves a dispute between two private parties.\" Id. In ReadyLink, the state proceeding aimed to resolve a dispute between two parties. There was no preliminary *8 investigation or formal charges, nor was the proceeding commenced to sanction ReadyLink. To the contrary, the state proceeding was initiated by ReadyLink. 8 Choudhry focuses on the nature of the parties' relationship (employer- employee), rather than on the nature of the proceedings. Such focus, however, contradicts the Supreme Court's reasoning in Sprint and other 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/16 courts have already rejected it. In Gonzalez v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 755 F.3d 176 (3rd Cir. 2014), the Third Circuit found abstention was proper where a state agency instituted disciplinary proceedings against an employee. The agency suspected the employee had made false statements, internally investigated the falsity of the statements and, after confirming them to be untruthful, lodged a formal statement of charges against him. The court reasoned that, \"[b]y filing this formal Statement of Charges, the Commission\u2014an arm of the State of New Jersey\u2014initiated the administrative disciplinary hearing to sanction [the employee] for his 'wrongful' conduct. This is a textbook example of a quasi-criminal action. \" Id. at 182. The same is true here. 2. Additional Factors The conclusion that the university proceeding is quasi-criminal in nature, and thus fits within the Younger doctrine, does not end the inquiry. The three Middlesex factors\u2014(i) ongoing state judicial proceeding, (ii) which implicates important state interests, and (3) in which there is an adequate opportunity to raise constitutional challenges\u2014must also be satisfied. See Sprint, 134 S.Ct. at 593. a. Judicial Proceedings Choudhry contends that the proceedings are not judicial in nature. The UC's process, however, provides the accused notice of the charges, a hearing before an independent fact-finding panel, the assistance of an attorney or advisor, the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, the opportunity to call witnesses and to present relevant evidence. If the panel makes recommendations adverse to Choudhry, he can present to the Chancellor additional reasons why the university should not follow the panel's recommendations. The Ninth Circuit has held that when these circumstances are present\u2014where there is legal representation at an adjudicatory *9 hearing\u2014the proceeding is \"quasi-judicial.\" See Baffert, 332 F.3d at 617-18. 9 3 3 Choudhry argues that the panel does not \"adjudicate the matter,\" but only \"makes findings, conclusions, and a recommendation\" to the Chancellor. Reply at 5. Yet, the disciplinary hearing in Middlesex was similarly held 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/16 before a panel of three or more members of the ethics committee, who were \"required to prepare a written report with its findings of fact and conclusions\" for the full committee. 457 U.S. at 427. The same was also true in Cameron, 2008 4838710, at *2-3, and Sanchez, 2015 6956288, at *1. b. Important State Interest Choudhry does not specifically dispute the second Middlesex factor, aside from his claim that the is acting as a private party. Generally, a state's interest in administering quasi-criminal proceedings \"without interference is [] significant.\" Baffert, 332 F.3d at 618. Here, the proceedings implicate the state's important interests in \"ensuring the smooth functioning of its state university system and the integrity of its tenure process,\" Cameron, 2008 4838710, at * 4, and \"establishing a fair, transparent, and just disciplinary system,\" Sanchez, 2015 6956288, at *3. c. Adequate Opportunity to Raise Constitutional Challenges Choudhry argues that the pending proceedings provide no adequate opportunity to raise constitutional claims. He points to no reason, however, why he cannot raise those arguments before the Hearing Committee. Moreover, if the proceedings result in an adverse decision, Choudhry can challenge that decision in state court, where he may certainly raise his constitutional arguments. The Supreme Court has, on multiple occasions, affirmed decisions to abstain notwithstanding a state agency's refusal or inability to consider federal challenges in the initial administrative proceedings, where those challenges could be presented during state-court judicial review. See, e.g., Middlesex, 457 U.S. at 435-36; Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc., 477 U.S. 619, 629 (1986). In determining whether a federal plaintiff has an adequate opportunity to raise his constitutional claims during state-court judicial review of an administrative decision, courts ask whether \"state law clearly bars the interposition of the constitutional claims.\" Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 425- 26 (1979). In making this determination, courts consider whether state law raises *10 procedural barriers to the presentation of the federal challenges. See id. at 430. Choudhry points to nothing which suggests California courts are procedurally barred from considering his federal challenges during their 10 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/16 review of the UC's disciplinary proceedings. In fact, California courts have repeatedly recognized their authority to consider constitutional challenges during appellate review of administrative decisions. See, e.g., Woodbury v. Brown-Dempsey, 108 Cal. App. 4th 421, 429-30 (2003) (reviewing writ petition brought by students claiming school violated their due process rights in expulsion proceedings). Choudhry argues that his case is unique because \"he seeks to enforce his clear entitlement not to be subjected to a second process.\" Reply at 4. The pending proceedings, he claims, are unconstitutional in their entirety. Yet, other plaintiffs have advanced similar arguments and no exceptions have been made. See, e.g., Williams, 662 F.2d at 1022; Sanchez, 2015 6956288, at *3; Ingber, 2014 2575780, at *4. In Middlesex, the attorney challenged his disciplinary proceedings as unconstitutional, arguing that the underlying disciplinary rule violated his First Amendment rights. He claimed, like Choudhry, that \"there was no opportunity in the state disciplinary proceedings to raise his federal constitutional challenge to the disciplinary rules.\" 457 U.S. at 435. The Supreme Court rejected this argument. It found that the plaintiff \"failed even to attempt to raise any federal constitutional challenge in the state proceedings,\" and \"point[ed] to nothing . . . to indicate that the members of the Ethics Committee, the majority of whom are lawyers, would have refused to consider a claim that the rules which they were enforcing violated federal constitutional guarantees.\" Id. Moreover, it noted that the New Jersey Supreme Court entertained the constitutional issues raised by the plaintiff during judicial review. Id. at 436. The high court reiterated that abstention is based upon the theory that \"'[t]he accused should first set up and rely upon his defense in the state courts, even though this involves a challenge of the validity of some statute, unless it plainly appears that this course would not afford adequate protection.'\" Id. (citing Younger, at 45). Choudhry must do the same here. The state proceedings afford Choudhry an adequate opportunity to raise his constitutional claims. 3. Exceptional Circumstances There are some exceptions to the Younger doctrine. When state proceedings are brought in *11 bad faith or for the purpose of harassment, federal equitable principles justify intervention. There might also be \"extraordinary 11 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/16 circumstances in which the necessary irreparable injury can be shown even in the absence of the usual prerequisites of bad faith and harassment.\" Younger, 401 U.S. at 53. Choudhry argues his case is exceptional for two reasons: (1) the state tribunal is biased and (2) he will suffer irreparable injury absent relief. a. Bad Faith and Bias Choudhry argues that bad faith and bias preclude Younger abstention. He contends that the \"outcome [of the disciplinary proceedings] is all but preordained.\" Mot. at 21. The bar for establishing bias is high. \"Without a showing to the contrary, state administrators 'are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.'\" Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 56 (quoting U.S. v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 421 (1941)). Only in rare situations is the probability of actual bias on the part of the decisionmaker too high to be constitutionally tolerable, like where \"the adjudicator has a pecuniary interest in the outcome\" or \"has been the target of personal abuse or criticism from the party before him.\" Id. at 46-47; see also Partington v. Gedan, 961 F.2d 852, 862 (9th Cir. 1992) (bad faith requires an \"allegation of repeated harassment by enforcement authorities with no intention of securing a conclusive resolution by an administrative tribunal or the courts [] or of pecuniary bias by the tribunal\"). Courts do not normally consider assertions of bias prior to the completion of an adjudicative proceeding. U.S. v. Litton Indus., Inc., 462 F.2d 14, 17 (9th Cir. 1972). \"Only in the 'exceptional' case where the court is presented with undisputed allegations of fundamental administrative prejudice will the court interrupt the progress of the adjudicative hearing.\" Id. Choudhry argues that President Napolitano and other administrators have shown bias. He claims Napolitano \"describe[ed] his conduct - falsely - as 'grop[ing]'\" and \"order[ed administrators to institute a disciplinary proceeding \"aimed at stripping him of his tenure and dismissing him from the University.\" Mot. at 6. Napolitano's quote about \"groping,\" however, was not explicitly directed at Choudhry. In fact, it was included in a Sacramento Bee editorial directly following the editorial board's description of Professor Geoff Marcy's conduct as \"serial *12 groping.\" Mehta Decl., Ex. 2. Napolitano 12 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/16 also did not \"order\" the Chancellor to \"strip\" Choudhry of his tenure, but rather directed him to \"institute disciplinary proceeding against Mr. Choudhry through the Privilege and Tenure process.\" Id., Ex. 1. She did not recommend any particular sanction and the available sanctions include several short of termination. Id., Ex. 4. Choudhry also points to the statements that Dirks and Steele made after his resignation: \"we are under no illusion that a resignation could or even should bring this matter and broader, related issues to a close\" and \"we must move in the direction of stronger sanctions.\" Reply at 7. The statements, on their face, relate to \"this matter and broader, related issues.\" While they indicate that the administrators may be working towards a policy of stronger sanctions, they do not establish that the Hearing Committee or the Chancellor cannot judge Choudhry's case fairly on the basis of its own circumstances. Choudhry also alleges that bias taints the university's general atmosphere. He notes that the specific individuals responsible for adjudicating his case will be drawn from the Academic Senate, a body that passed a motion to grant Sorrell an award for outstanding service to the university. Mehta Decl., Ex. 7. These allegations are insufficient to impute bias on the yet unannounced members of the hearing committee. See Kenneally v. Lungren, 967 F.2d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1992) (refusing to impute bias from some members of an agency to others). Choudhry provides no specific or actual proof of bias on the part of any person responsible for adjudicating his case, nor could he because those people have not yet even been selected. Moreover, the Academic Senate procedures specifically provide for recusal of any committee member who cannot fairly review his case. While Choudhry has provided some allegations of potential bias, none overcomes the presumption of honesty or suggests that the began its proceedings solely to harass him. His allegations of bias are insufficient to justify interruption of the proceedings. b. Irreparable Injury Choudhry also argues that Younger abstention is inappropriate because he will suffer irreparable harm if the proceedings continue. He says: \"Either this Court hears his claims now, or Defendants inflict irreparable harm, period.\" Reply at 6. To establish an exception to *13 Younger, a plaintiff must 13 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/16 be facing an irreparable injury that is both \"great\" and \"immediate.\" Younger, 401 U.S. at 46.4 4 Younger suggests that irreparable injury may possibly be established by showing that a challenged state statute is \"'flagrantly and patently violative of express constitutional prohibitions in every clause, sentence and paragraph, and in whatever manner and against whomever an effort might be made to apply it.\" Id. at 53-54 (citation omitted). In NOPSI, the Supreme Court considered whether Younger's \"posited exception for state statutes 'flagrantly and patently violative of express constitutional prohibitions' ought to apply equally to state proceedings and orders flagrantly and patently violative of . . . constitutional prescription[s].\" 491 U.S. at 367. It declined to decide the matter \"since the proceeding and order at issue d[id] not meet that description.\" Id. Choudhry does not argue that his case falls within this specific exception. -------- Choudhry relies on Mannes v. Gillespie, 967 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir. 1992). There, the Ninth Circuit ruled that \"a claim that a state prosecution will violate the Double Jeopardy Clause presents an exception to the general rule of Younger.\" Id. at 1312. Choudhry cites no authority for extending Mannes outside the narrow criminal context where defendants are entitled to special protections. Indeed, \"the mere possiblity of erroneous initial application of constitutional standards will usually not amount to the irreparable injury necessary to justify a disruption of orderly state proceedings.\" Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 484-85 (1965). Generally, post-administrative hearing judicial review of constitutional challenges is sufficient. See Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n, 477 U.S. at 629; Middlesex, 457 U.S. at 436; Robinson v. California State Bar, No. 15-MC-80129-JD, 2015 3486724, at *5 (N.D. Cal. May 28, 2015). For this reason, courts have applied Younger in comparable cases, even where plaintiffs have alleged due process violations. See Sanchez, 2015 6956288, at *4 n.3; Ingber, 2014 2575780, at *1. Choudhry's allegations of immediate injury do not rise to the exceptionally high level required to warrant federal judicial intervention. Absent relief, Choudhry faces the stress of a second proceeding and expense of defending himself. \"Mere injuries, however substantial, in terms of money, time, and energy necessarily expended in the absence of a stay, are not enough.\" Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61 (1974); see also Younger, 401 U.S. at 46 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 14/16 (recognizing that financial injuries that are \"incidental to every criminal proceeding brought lawfully and in good faith\" do not constitute great and irreparable injury in the legal sense). Choudhry argues he is currently \"unable to go to work or teach,\" Mot. at 20, but he is still a tenured faculty member, paid *14 by the university, with research and administrative duties and an office in a university building. The \"disruption of workers' lives and habits\" does not generally threaten irreparable harm. Graphic Commc'ns Conference--Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters Local 404M v. Bakersfield Californian, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 1125-26 (E.D. Cal. 2008); see also Levich v. Liberty Cent. Sch. Dist., 258 F. Supp. 2d 339, 344-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (no irreparable harm where \"plaintiff has not been suspended from his employment duties and continues to be employed by the School District, receiving full pay and benefits\"). Though the stress and expense of the proceedings may be substantial, these immediate injuries do not justify federal interference with the activities of the state. 14 An injunction is not warranted on this record. Younger and its progeny require that federal courts abstain from interfering with ongoing state proceedings absent bad faith, harassment or other exceptional circumstances. No such exceptional circumstances have been shown. For this reason, Choudhry's motion for preliminary injunction is denied ORDERED. Dated: November 9, 2016 /s/_________ United States District Judge About us 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 15/16 Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 8:30 Choudhry v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., Case No. 16-cv-05281 | Casetext Search + Citator 16/16", "7628_103.pdf": "His lawsuit names the University of California regents and President Janet Napolitano and seeks unspecified damages. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images California This article is more than 8 years old Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination School treated white staff who committed sexual misconduct more leniently while threatening him with campus ban and loss of tenure, Sujit Choudhry says Staff and agencies Fri 16 Sep 2016 00.02 The former dean of the University of California, Berkeley law school has filed a lawsuit accusing school officials of singling him out because of his race for a second investigation of sexual harassment allegations. Sujit Choudhry says in a federal discrimination lawsuit filed Thursday in San Francisco that the University of California has treated white faculty 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 1/6 members and administrators found to have committed sexual misconduct more leniently while threatening him with a campus ban and loss of tenure. His lawsuit names the University of California regents and Janet Napolitano, the school\u2019s president, and seeks unspecified damages message seeking comment from the University of California was not immediately returned. Choudhry resigned as dean in March amid faculty outrage that he had been allowed to remain in the position after a campus investigation substantiated sexual harassment allegations from his executive assistant. Most recently, outrage flared again after he returned to campus this month to work. The woman at the center of his case, his former executive assistant Tyann Sorrell, said at the time that his presence could \u201csilence victims from coming forward\u201d. As described in a university report and Sorrell\u2019s lawsuit, she said Choudhry treated her like his personal \u201cmaid\u201d and began hugging and kissing her without permission. According to her claim, he eventually touched her on a \u201cnear daily basis\u201d and allegedly rubbed and caressed her arms and shoulders while she typed. Choudhry admitted touching her \u2013 but disputed some specifics of her allegations \u2013 and the university concluded that he had violated sexual harassment policies. His salary was reduced by 10% to $373,500 for one year as punishment. After Sorrell, 41, filed a lawsuit, the case went public and sparked intense backlash, with critics saying the university had failed a victim and given an offensively light sanction to a powerful administrator. Choudhry subsequently stepped down as dean but remained on the faculty, and Napolitano in March requested that Choudhry be barred from returning to campus for the rest of the semester. In his lawsuit, Choudhry said the University of California opened a second investigation of him for the same conduct after Sorrell filed the lawsuit and after reports it had mishandled cases of serious sexual misconduct. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and a court order stopping the second disciplinary process. 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 2/6 Most viewed 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 3/6 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 4/6 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 5/6 2/22/25, 8:31 Ex-dean accused of sexual harassment sues Berkeley for racial discrimination | California | The Guardian 6/6", "7628_104.pdf": "Sujit Choudhry sues system over sex harassment discipline By Alexandra Yoon-Hendricks Sep 16, 2016 Former Berkeley School of Law dean Sujit Choudhry sued the Board of Regents \u2014 among other university-related parties \u2014 on Thursday, alleging that he was the victim of racial discrimination and that the university was attempting to deprive him of his reputation and career. The lawsuit comes after campus outcry over Choudhry\u2019s return to campus this fall as a Berkeley Law faculty member, despite having resigned as dean in March after allegations of sexual harassment came to light campus Title office found that his behavior toward his former executive assistant, Tyann Sorrell, violated sexual misconduct policies. In March President Janet Napolitano, who is named in the lawsuit, called for a second disciplinary hearing for Choudhry, which could result in Choudhry being fired. He initially was punished with a 10 percent cut to his dean salary for one year, among other sanctions, and campus officials were widely criticized for implementing punishments that many have called too lenient. The lawsuit alleges that \u201cno one has ever suggested that Professor Choudhry\u2019s conduct was sexually motivated or predatory\u201d and accuses Napolitano of using Choudhry\u2019s case to \u201cimprove the University\u2019s image as well as her own.\u201d In two grievances filed in the past year, Choudhry has challenged the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings against him by Berkeley\u2019s Academic Senate division per Napolitano\u2019s request. \u201cBy targeting Professor Choudhry, who is of South Asian descent and a non- U.S. citizen, the University hopes to deflect attention from its failure to meaningfully punish Caucasian faculty and administrators who were found to have committed appalling sexual misconduct, and from the fact that it deserted Ms. Sorrell,\u201d the lawsuit alleged. Choudhry\u2019s attorney could not immediately be reached for comment. In addition to the regents and Napolitano, Choudhry\u2019s lawsuit also names Berkeley administrators Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, interim Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Carol Christ, Vice Provost for the Faculty Benjamin Hermalin and former vice provost for the faculty Janet Broughton as defendants. \u201cAt this point what can be said is that the University intends to mount a vigorous and successful defense,\u201d said Berkeley spokesperson Dan Mogulof in an email spokesperson could not immediately be reached for comment Berkeley has been grappling with a string of high-profile sexual harassment scandals in the past two years. In October 2015, former astronomy professor Geoffrey Marcy resigned amid sexual harassment allegations. In addition, Graham Fleming was removed from his role as Berkeley Global Campus ambassador in March, after having resigned in April 2015 2/22/25, 8:31 Sujit Choudhry sues system over sex harassment discipline | Archives | dailycal.org 1/2 from his post as vice chancellor for research amid allegations of sexual harassment. In the past five years Berkeley\u2019s Title office has found that 19 campus employees violated sexual harassment policies. [documentcloud url=\" Sujit-Choudhry-sues-the-university.html\"] 2/22/25, 8:31 Sujit Choudhry sues system over sex harassment discipline | Archives | dailycal.org 2/2", "7628_105.pdf": "21, 2025 CT2025 \uf015\uf054 World Reuters March 11, 2016 \uf39e \ue61b \uf232 \uf08c \uf0e0 The law school dean for the University of California at Berkeley resigned his post on Thursday after admitting to physical contact with his executive assistant that campus officials said violated the school's sexual harassment policy. The departure of Sujit Choudhry, 46, who faces a lawsuit by his accuser, came amid heightened scrutiny of the way in which colleges and universities across the country have dealt with allegations of rape and sexual abuse on campuses. School teacher transferred for sexually harassing two students Choudhry has admitted to engaging in unwanted physical contact with his assistant on multiple occasions, including hugging and kissing her. He has also admitted to holding her hands to his waist and touching her shoulders and arms from behind while she sat at her desk, according to a university statement. But Choudhry, who will remain on the law school faculty for the time being, has denied sexually harassing his assistant. The assistant, who was not named in an investigative report from the school's Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination, also complained that Choudhry directed her to perform personal tasks on his behalf, such as mailing mortgage documents and finding him a laundromat. The move came a day after the school said Choudhry was going on indefinite leave over the issue. An announcement about an interim replacement for the position of dean will be made as soon as possible, the school said. Choudhry said in a statement he had fully cooperated with the school in its investigation and denied he engaged in sexual harassment. Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint over sexual harassment complaint Choudhry has admitted to engaging in unwanted physical contact with his assistant on multiple occasions Join Us Join Us Hooters plans bankruptcy filing to restructure Hooters plans bankruptcy filing to restructure business business Robert Davi worries his politics Robert Davi worries his politics could cost him role in Goonies could cost him role in Goonies sequel sequel Updated 2 hours ago Robert Davi shares concern that his outspoken conservative views may prevent him from reprising his role in Goonies 2. Jerry Butler, legendary Jerry Butler, legendary singer and Illinois politician, dies singer and Illinois politician, dies at 85 at 85 Updated 3 hours ago Jerry \u2018The Iceman\u2019 Butler, iconic singer and longtime Illinois commissioner, passes away at 85. 'Now we see why 50 Cent needs 'Now we see why 50 Cent needs heavy security' \u2014 Internet reacts heavy security' \u2014 Internet reacts to his GoFundMe campaign for to his GoFundMe campaign for Big Meech\u2019s bills Big Meech\u2019s bills Updated 3 hours ago The internet reacts as 50 Cent launches a GoFundMe for Big Meech, poking fun at the Black Mafia Family co-founder. Real reason behind Martin Real reason behind Martin Fowler\u2019s \u2018EastEnders\u2019 exit Fowler\u2019s \u2018EastEnders\u2019 exit revealed revealed Updated 3 hours ago James Bye reveals why he decided to leave \u2018EastEnders\u2019 after 10 years, marking an emotional exit for Martin Fowler 2/22/25, 8:31 Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint 1/5 will immediately begin a leave of absence as Dean of Berkeley Law, in order to ensure that this lawsuit does not become a distraction for the Law School, the University, and our community,\" Choudhry said in a statement on Wednesday. Choudhry's accuser has been placed on paid leave until she is ready to return to work, the school said. Teacher arrested for harassing students in Karachi The Daily Californian student newspaper reported that the lawsuit was filed on Tuesday and it alleged Choudhry subjected other women at the school to unwanted advances as well previous dean at the school, John Dwyer, resigned in 2002 following allegations from a former law school student that he sexually harassed her. Last October Berkeley astronomy professor Geoff Marcy also resigned over sexual harassment allegations Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Name (required) Email (required) Write your comment here Post comment Israel to free 602 prisoners, Hamas to release six hostages on Saturday Sao Paulo bus crash kills 12 university students in Brazil Lebanon to hold Nasrallah\u2019s funeral this Sunday Justin Trudeau claps back at Trump after Canada defeats in 4 Nations final 2/22/25, 8:31 Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint 2/5 Google: Global search engine or just India\u2019s cheerleader? Trump declares himself \u2018King\u2019\u2014Will Google validate it like the \u2018Gulf of America\u2019?\" You May Like by Taboola Sponsored Links War Thunder Techno Mag Tips and Tricks Crossout Play War Thunder now for free Play Now Access all channels anywhere, anytime This is What Your Fingers Say About Your Personality Shooter Action Play Now Kendal Swanson identified as alleged pilot of Delta flight that crashed upside down in Toronto Delta upside-down plane crash allegedly involved all-female crew Pressure on exchange rate worries Kanye West and 50 Cent react to Rocky\u2019s acquittal after not guilty verdict 2/22/25, 8:31 Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint 3/5 Pakistan Business World Opinion Life & Style T.Edit Sports Blog Prayer Timing Pakistan Weather Forecast Pakistan Karachi Weather Lahore Weather About Us Online Advertising Feeds Subscribe to the Paper Cricket News Football News News News Style Guide Privacy Policy Copyright Code of ethics Scriptwriter Nasir Adeeb Reveals Details of Kubra Khan and Gohar Rasheed's Love Story Was Delta plane crash pilot a hire revolution : reflecting on the opportunities and challenges Night at the Museum: the Lahore Chapter Rekindling the Indo bromance The mango republic The myth of Central Asia's trade potential Pakistan's rising population: a neglected emergency 2/22/25, 8:31 Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint 4/5 Entertainment News Videos Islamabad Weather Contact Us Careers News News Mobile App This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from. Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted \u00a9 2025 The Express Tribune. 2/22/25, 8:31 Indian-American Berkeley law school dean resigns over sexual harassment complaint 5/5", "7628_106.pdf": "/ / Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know The Ladies Finger October 5, 2016, 13:35:36 Home World Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know Advertisement This March, a 41-year- old woman named Tyann Sorrell filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court, suing Sujit Choudhry, the former Dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, for sexually harassing her over a two-year period while she was his executive assistant.... Home Video Shorts News 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know \u2013 Firstpost 1/4 By Maya Palit This March, a 41-year- old woman named Tyann Sorrell filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court, suing Sujit Choudhry, the former Dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, for sexually harassing her over a two-year period while she was his executive assistant. She sued the university too, for what she thought was an exceedingly casual treatment of her case the previous year. In 2015, the University of California\u2019s Office of Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination decided that Choudhry was guilty of harassing Sorrell, but didn\u2019t do much about it \u2014 they deducted 10 percent of his salary for one year (which still left him with a whopping $373,500, or approximately Rs 2.5 crore), asked him to write her a formal apology and undergo counselling. Choudhry resumed teaching in the faculty a few weeks ago, having resigned as Dean in March this year after taking a leave of absence because of faculty outrage, not official legal pressure. Advertisement In a new and bizarre turn of events, he is now playing the victim. Choudhry sued the university on 15 September, accusing it of racial discrimination in its interrogation of him over allegations of sexual harassment. Choudhry\u2019s complaint, in a nutshell, laments the fact that the university has treated several white sexual offenders better in the past, and that it has picked on his South Asian descent to deflect from its shirking of responsibility. Home Video Shorts News 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know \u2013 Firstpost 2/4 Find us on YouTube Subscribe This Week in Explainers: Why South Korea's incentives to women to have babies isn't working to drop food aid into Gaza: Why the task is complicated Tags Top Shows Related Stories Continue Reading Home Video Shorts News 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know \u2013 Firstpost 3/4 Who was Amarnath Ghosh, the Indian classical dancer shot dead in the US? Anant Ambani, Radhika Merchant pre-wedding: Why Jamnagar was chosen as venue About Firstpost Web Stories World India Explainers Opinion Sports Cricket Tech/Auto Entertainment Vantage NETWORK18 News18 Money Control TV18 Forbes India Sitemap Subscribe Now Copyright @ 2024. Firstpost - All Rights Reserved is on YouTube Home Video Shorts News 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley's Sujit Choudhry allegedly sexually harassed his employee: What you need to know \u2013 Firstpost 4/4", "7628_107.pdf": "Tyann Sorrell, who went public with her claims against dean Choudhry last year, says the deal \u2018insults all who suffer harassment at the hands of those with power and privilege\u2019. Photograph: Ramin Talaie/The Guardian California This article is more than 7 years old Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges Law dean Sujit Choudhry will remain a faculty member \u2018in good standing\u2019 until next year, as critics say the deal shows how powerful men avoid consequences Sam Levin in San Francisco Tue 18 Apr 2017 20.51 The former University of California, Berkeley, law dean whose sexual harassment case sparked national outrage has reached a deal with the school that allows him to maintain tenure, receive research funding and avoid charges. Although university investigators concluded that Sujit Choudhry had sexually harassed his executive assistant while he was dean, the university is 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 1/7 ending its disciplinary process and allowing the professor to remain a faculty member \u201cin good standing\u201d until he \u201cvoluntarily\u201d resigns next year, according to newly released documents. Tyann Sorrell, who went public with her claims last year that Choudhry repeatedly touched her inappropriately when she was his assistant, slammed the settlement terms, saying in a statement: \u201cThis deal insults all who suffer harassment at the hands of those with power and privilege.\u201d The professor\u2019s attorney said the settlement \u201ccontains no admission of liability for sexual harassment\u201d. The agreement ends one of the most high-profile cases of faculty misconduct at an American university in recent years, at a time when there have been increasingly tense debates about harassment, gender discrimination and sexual violence in academia. The settlement \u2013 which also stipulates that Choudhry will not teach courses in his final year, but can still access travel reimbursements and research funding of more than $97,000 \u2013 was the latest example of men in powerful positions avoiding serious consequences despite formal findings of misconduct, critics said. \u201cIt\u2019s extremely disappointing,\u201d Leslie Levy, Sorrell\u2019s attorney, said in an interview on Tuesday. \u201cThis is a reflection of the university once again not taking this issue seriously, and it\u2019s a reflection of privilege breeding privilege.\u201d Sorrell spoke at length with the Guardian last year about her harassment case and her frustrations with the university\u2019s response. Choudhry hugged and kissed her without her permission, touching her on a \u201cnear daily basis\u201d and one time putting her hands on his waist before kissing her, according to her claim. She said the behavior led her to experience severe anxiety and depression. Although the university\u2019s investigation substantiated her claims \u2013 and Choudhry admitted to touching her \u2013 the administration\u2019s punishment constituted a salary reduction by 10% to $373,500 for one year. Sorrell subsequently filed a lawsuit that received international attention and led Choudhry to resign as dean. Amid ongoing accusations that the university had failed to support Sorrell with its light sanction of the dean of the prestigious law school, two high- profile administrators resigned. 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 2/7 As part of his settlement, Choudhry has agreed to drop a grievance he filed against university officials, challenging their disciplinary review process. The outcome resembles a pattern of tenured professors facing minimal punishment for misconduct while university staff found to have violated harassment policies are often fired. In 2016, the university was also accused of mishandling sexual harassment cases involving a famous astronomy professor and a professor of south and south-east Asian studies. Separate from the resolution in Choudhry\u2019s disciplinary process, the university and Choudhry also reached a settlement agreement with Sorrell in the lawsuit she filed. As part of that agreement, Chouhdry has agreed to pay $50,000 to her attorneys and $50,000 to not-for- profit groups that focus on sexual harassment and assault. Sorrell is not receiving any money from Choudhry, according to Levy. The university has not disclosed the terms of its settlement with Sorrell, but a spokesman, Dan Mogulof, said: \u201cSorrell has received payment for the injury she claims she incurred as a result of Prof Choudhry\u2019s actions.\u201d Steven Herman, Choudhry\u2019s attorney, said in an email that the settlements \u201clet him, and importantly, his wife and children, move on from a difficult situation that has dragged on for over a year\u201d. The agreement with the university, he claimed, meant \u201chas explicitly recognized that he has always been, and remains, a tenured faculty member in \u2018good standing\u2019\u201d. \u201cThe University acknowledges that Professor Choudhry did not act with sexual intent and never posed a risk to anyone,\u201d Herman added. Levy emphasized that Sorrell was not part of the agreement between Choudhry and the university and had no control over the terms. The The campus at Berkeley. Sujit Choudhry\u2019s was one of the most high-profile cases of faculty misconduct at an American university in recent years. Photograph: Alamy 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 3/7 Most viewed decision to allow Choudhry to remain a faculty member was an \u201cinsult to the professors who are in good standing\u201d, she said. Sorrell, who has returned to her job as a law school executive assistant, is trying to move forward with her life, but remains affected by the case, Levy added. \u201cShe\u2019s very much still in the process of healing from both the harassment by Choudhry as well as the university\u2019s appalling response to it.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 4/7 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 5/7 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 6/7 2/22/25, 8:31 Berkeley dean in sexual harassment case keeps tenure and avoids charges | California | The Guardian 7/7"} |
7,398 | Choong Mo Kang | Julliard School | [
"7398_101.pdf",
"7398_102.pdf",
"7398_103.pdf",
"7398_104.pdf",
"7398_105.pdf"
] | {"7398_101.pdf": "Norman Lebrecht January 23, 2015 letter (reproduced) went out to Juilliard staff last night from the college president, Joseph W. Polisi. Extract am writing to let you know that the School has received a report alleging sexual misconduct by faculty member Choong Mo Kang. His alleged misconduct involved a student. Juilliard reported this matter to law enforcement and has prohibited Mr Kang from returning to School premises. Mr Kang has been suspended pending further action by the School. Share this article Find Useful Knowle Free ChatGPT Extension Op Home About Slippedisc Contact Login \uf002 2/22/25, 8:32 Exclusive: Juilliard suspends faculty member for 'alleged sexual misconduct' - Slippedisc 1/5 Juilliard is cooperating fully with the external law enforcement investigation\u2026 The School does not tolerate inappropriate or illegal conduct, investigates all allegations thereof and takes definitive and corrective actions based on the results of those investigations. UPDATE: Choong denies the charges. See here. \uf177 Previous post Next post \uf178 Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Exclusive: Juilliard suspends faculty member for 'alleged sexual misconduct' - Slippedisc 2/5 Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Exclusive: Juilliard suspends faculty member for 'alleged sexual misconduct' - Slippedisc 3/5 Norman Lebrecht February 20, 2025 Backstage, last night, the pianist took the plunge Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The West-East Diwan Orchestra has been rehearsing in Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 Herbert Fritsch\u2019s production of The Barber of Seville Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The Orquesta de Extremadura, serving Spain\u2019s poorest region TODAY: + Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Exclusive: Juilliard suspends faculty member for 'alleged sexual misconduct' - Slippedisc 4/5 \"We use cookies and other data collection technologies to provide the best experience for our customers. You may request that your data not be shared with third parties here: \"Do Not Sell My Data \uf39e \uf099 \uf0e1 Quick Links Home Contact Subscribe Login Cookies & Privacy Policy Terms of Use Contact [email protected] Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Exclusive: Juilliard suspends faculty member for 'alleged sexual misconduct' - Slippedisc 5/5", "7398_102.pdf": "Student Council asks Juilliard to cancel James Levine appearance, issues statement Read the open letter from the Student Council to the administration of the School and the greater Juilliard Community Avatar photo Juilliard Student Council December 3, 2017 Opinion Dr. Joseph Polisi, President Ara Guzelimian, Provost and Dean Dr. Adam Meyer, Associate Dean and Director, Music Division The views and opinions expressed in The Citizen-Penguin are solely those of its contributors and do not represent those of The Juilliard School or any of its employees. The Juilliard School is not responsible for any of the content found in The Citizen-Penguin or for the accuracy of any information it contains. 2/22/25, 8:32 Student Council asks Juilliard to cancel James Levine appearance, issues statement \u2013 The Citizen-Penguin 1/3 Joseph Soucy, Assistant Dean for Orchestral Studies Cc: Damian Woetzel, President-Designate To the above and the greater Juilliard community: We are devastated to learn of conductor James Levine\u2019s history of sexual abuse. We believe sexual violence has no place in the performing arts. We respectfully ask the administration: 1. to cancel Levine\u2019s 2/23/18 Juilliard Orchestra-Lindemann Program appearance in the Peter J. Sharp Theater, and employ different conducting personnel as necessary, and 2. to make a statement to the Juilliard community about Levine\u2019s conduct. We note that Juilliard dealt decisively with the recent sexual misconduct revelations surrounding Drama alumnus Kevin Spacey and ex-Music faculty Choong Mo Kang. We hope for a commensurate response to this weekend\u2019s disturbing news. We urge survivors of sexual violence to strive to find the courage to continue speaking out. We look forward to the day when sexual abuse by leaders in our fields is unthinkable, but we know it is still all too common. In this case, we believe a swift and meaningful response is a necessary step toward that vision. The Juilliard Student Council *** CORRECTED: Letter from Student Council said the concert was 2017, but it is in 2018. Avatar photo Juilliard Student Council December 3, 2017 Opinion / / 2/22/25, 8:32 Student Council asks Juilliard to cancel James Levine appearance, issues statement \u2013 The Citizen-Penguin 2/3 3 thoughts on \u201cStudent Council asks Juilliard to cancel James Levine appearance, issues statement\u201d Editor-in-Chief December 4, 2017 at 1:16 pm REMOVED: One comment asking the School to defend its response to another cases in the past, which included the names of accused perpetrators REMOVED: Because we are student-run and student-owned, we don\u2019t have the legal resources to confidently publish names of accused perpetrators, and are unable to fact-check the comment Shana Parkeharrison December 5, 2017 at 8:26 am 2/23/18\u2026. not 2017 Editor-in-Chief December 5, 2017 at 9:55 am Corrected! Thank you Comments are closed. The Citizen-Penguin The views and opinions expressed in The Citizen-Penguin are solely those of its contributors and do not represent those of The Juilliard School or any of its employees. The Juilliard School is not responsible for any of the content found in The Citizen-Penguin or for the accuracy of any information it contains. Domain & Hosting: Bluehost / Seal illustration: Jake Faunce This was a Hiya, Scout! design / 2/22/25, 8:32 Student Council asks Juilliard to cancel James Levine appearance, issues statement \u2013 The Citizen-Penguin 3/3", "7398_103.pdf": "Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding By Jaime Prisco Updated: Feb 02 2015, 16:29 The Juilliard School has suspended Korean faculty member Kang Choong-mo after a report of alleged sexual misconduct lead to an internal investigation. Kang claims there was a misunderstanding in the matter. 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 1/7 Allegedly, there was a report filed against Kang, 55, about misconduct with a student. Since the report, Kang has been prohibited from returning to the school premises. According to Slipped Disc, a letter went out to the Juilliard staff from college President Joseph W. Polisi explaining the situation am writing to let you know that the school has received a report alleging sexual misconduct by faculty member Choong-mo Kang. His alleged misconduct involved a student. Juilliard reported this matter to law enforcement and has prohibited Mr. Kang from returning to school premises. Mr. Kang has been suspended pending further action by the school,\u201d he said. But Kang has given an interview to a Korean media site, saying that the alleged misconduct never happened and that is it all a misunderstanding. \u201cJuilliard is a school that teaches dance and music, so there are stringent rules on physical contact. The rule says that ahead of any physical contact need to ask the student\u2019s permission, and didn\u2019t know this,\u201d he said. 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 2/7 He continued by saying the he touched student\u2019s fingers and hands while instructing on the piano, which the student found to be inappropriate. \u201cThe student, who have taught for two years, stated humiliation as the reason for the report. I\u2019ve taught for 20 years this way, and never has this kind of contact surfaced as an issue have not resigned from Juilliard have been suspended as per the rules, and the investigation is ongoing,\u201d he said. Kang began teaching at Juilliard in 2011. He has won a number of music competitions, including the Frinna Awerbuch International Piano and the Washington International competitions, and has performed solo with the London and Moscow philharmonic orchestras. 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 3/7 Opera Star Montserrat Caball\u00e9 Receives Six-Month Suspended Prison Sentence and a \u20ac240,000 Fine for Tax Evasion [UPDATE] Davide Livermore Replaces Helga Schmidt as Art Director of the Palau de les Arts in Valencia After Suspension and Arrest \u00a9 2025 Classicalite All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission. 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 4/7 The Musical Scandal That Made Jerry Springer a Cultural Flashpoint Chantelle Nassari's Accessibility Role in 'Wicked' Sparks Global Change 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 5/7 Lencia Kebede Makes History as First Black Actress to Play Elphaba in Broadway's 'Wicked' 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 6/7 About Us / Contact Us / Terms of Service / Privacy Policy \u00a9 2025 THECLASSICALITE. All Rights Reserved 2/22/25, 8:32 Juilliard Teacher Kang Choong-mo Suspended After Alleged Sexual Misconduct, Claims Misunderstanding 7/7", "7398_104.pdf": "Norman Lebrecht February 02, 2015 The pianist Choong Mo Kang, suspended ten days ago and reported to the New York police for alleged sexual misconduct, has given an interview to Korean media about the charges. He says: \u2018Julliard is a school that teaches dance and music, so there are stringent rules on physical contact. The rule says that ahead of any physical contact need to ask the student\u2019s permission, and didn\u2019t know this Home About Slippedisc Contact Login \uf002 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 1/6 Kang went on to say that he touched the student\u2019s fingers and hands while instructing on the piano. \u2018The student, who have taught for two years, stated humiliation as the reason for the report. I\u2019ve taught for 20 years this way, and never has this kind of contact surfaced as an issue.\u2019 He added have not resigned from Julliard have been suspended as per the rules, and the investigation is ongoing.\u2019 \uf177 Previous post Next post \uf178 Share this article: \uf39e \uf099 \uf0e1 Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 2/6 \u00bb Capital is at risk Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 3/6 TODAY: + Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 4/6 Norman Lebrecht February 20, 2025 Backstage, last night, the pianist took the plunge Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The West-East Diwan Orchestra has been rehearsing in Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 Herbert Fritsch\u2019s production of The Barber of Seville Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The Orquesta de Extremadura, serving Spain\u2019s poorest region\u2026 \uf39e \uf099 \uf0e1 Quick Links Home Contact Subscribe Login Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 5/6 \"We use cookies and other data collection technologies to provide the best experience for our customers. You may request that your data not be shared with third parties here: \"Do Not Sell My Data Cookies & Privacy Policy Terms of Use Contact [email protected] Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:32 Suspended Juilliard professor states his defence - Slippedisc 6/6", "7398_105.pdf": "Subscribe Photos Video World Sports Opinion Entertainment & Art Lifestyle Finance Business National North Korea Entertainment & Arts K-pop Films Shows & Dramas Music Theater & Others Sat, Feb Korean faculty member at Julliard under probe Posted Updated Kang Choong-mo By Kwon Ji-youn Julliard is conducting an internal investigation into a report of sexual misconduct by a Korean member of its faculty. Local media reported Thursday that a report filed with the school alleged that pianist Kang Choong-mo's sexual misconduct involved a student and that Julliard filed a follow-up report with the law enforcement. Kang has been prohibited from returning to school premises. In a letter to members of the Julliard Community, President Joseph Polisi said Julliard is \"cooperating fully with the external law enforcement investigation,\" and that it \"does not tolerate inappropriate or illegal conduct and investigates all allegations thereof.\" However, Kang told the vernacular Chosun Ilbo on Thursday that he has never sexually harassed a Most Read in Entertai 1 leaves Ko Copyrigh 2 Cha Joo-y dream be 3 Lee Ji-ah for grand Japanese she cut ti parents 4 K-drama shorter s episode f 5 Apple of evokes no first love remake 2/22/25, 8:32 Korean faculty member at Julliard under probe - The Korea Times 1/3 [email protected] More articles by this reporter student. \"Julliard is a school that teaches dance and music, so there are stringent rules on physical contact,\" he said. \"The rule says that ahead of any physical contact need to ask the student's permission, and didn't know this.\" Kang said that he touched the student's fingers and hands while instructing on the piano and this student found this problematic. \"The student, who have taught for two years, stated humiliation as the reason for the report,\" he said. \"I've taught for 20 years this way, and never has this kind of contact surfaced as an issue.\" Kang said that Julliard suspends all school personnel undergoing investigation upon being reported. Kang has been suspended pending further action by the school have not resigned from Julliard,\" he said have been suspended as per the rules, and the investigation is ongoing.\" Classical music fans who have come across the news of Kang's alleged misconduct say that it is hard to believe. Norman Lebrecht, a British commentator on music, detailed President Polisi's letter regarding Kang's alleged misconduct on his website, and visitors commented that Julliard has handled the situation poorly. One visitor wrote in disbelief know Mr. Kang and know he is definitely not a person who would do such a thing.\" Another wrote, \"This is not a matter that should be broadcast on the Internet. It is an investigation in progress.\" Kang, 55, began teaching at Julliard in 2011. He has won a number of music competitions, including the Frinna Awerbuch International Piano Competition and the Washington International Competition, and has performed solo with the London Philharmonic Orchestra and the Moscow Philharmonic Orchestra. He studied at Seoul National University, and earned his master's degree from the San Francisco Conservatory and his Artist's Diploma from Peabody Conservatory. Follow Kwon Ji-youn on Twitter @jennajykwon Top 10 Stories 1 Koo h indefinite Barbie Hs 2 N. Korea use 'strat in respon Korea 3 Ukraine o sending o Korean Korea 'po 4 Wearing Vietnam entry den $3,000 fi 5 Why (som hate Chin 6 Korea str protests renewed claim ove 7 Trump in facilitate investme China fro in strateg 8 Trump se into allie concerns geograph to conflic 9 advanced economy crypto bo blockcha 10 confi children for adopt infamous Home Recommended Contents For You Taboola \ud6c4\uc6d0\ub9c1\ud06c Actor Kim Sae-ron found dead at home YouTuber faces backlash for taking down videos about Kim Sae-ron after her death Actor Yoo Ah-in released after getting suspended sentence in drug case Bayern Munich beat Tott Hotspur in Seoul 2/22/25, 8:32 Korean faculty member at Julliard under probe - The Korea Times 2/3 & Publisher: Oh Young-jin Digital News Email: [email protected] Tel: 02-724-2114 Online newspaper registration No: \uc11c\uc6b8,\uc54452844 Date of registration: 2020.02.05 Masthead: The Korea Times Copyright \u00a9 koreatimes.co.kr. All rights reserved. About Us Introduction History Contact Us Products & Services Subscribe E-paper Service Content Sales Site Map Policy Code of Ethics Ombudsman Privacy Statement Terms of Service Copyright Policy Family Site Hankook Ilbo Dongwha Group Lee Ji-ah apologizes for grandfather's pro-Japanese past, says she cut ties with parents Actress Kim Sae-ron laid to rest Actor Lee Ha-nee addresses real estate purchase allegations, denies illegal practices Play War Thunder now for free Explore Affordable Camper Van Options Access all channels anywhere, anytime 2/22/25, 8:32 Korean faculty member at Julliard under probe - The Korea Times 3/3"} |
7,819 | Han Reichgelt | University of South Florida – St. Petersburg | [
"7819_101.pdf",
"7819_102.pdf"
] | {"7819_101.pdf": "\uf078 About Contact Advertise Full Issues Staffing at St. Petersburg Home \u0000 2016 \u0000 November \u0000 21 \u0000 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \uf073November 21, 2016 \uf007Devin Rodriguez Campus News News 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 1/19 Han Reichgelt: Top academic administrator removed from his position in Feb. 2015. Courtesy of St. Petersburg Dr. Han Reichgelt was ousted as the university\u2019s top academic administrator in February 2015 after he propositioned a female professor and made sexually offensive remarks. The abrupt departure of Reichgelt, just eight months after he was hired, has been shrouded in secrecy since he was transferred to a nine-month online teaching post in the College of Business and ordered to attend diversity training off campus. But records obtained by the Crow\u2019s Nest show that Reichgelt admitted making sexual advances and engaging in unwelcome conduct toward the professor while they were attending an off-campus event in late 2014. Shocked, the professor reported the incident to university administrators. They investigated and concluded on Jan. 14, 2015, that Reichgelt had violated the university\u2019s policies on diversity and equal opportunity and sexual misconduct/sexual harassment. Seven weeks later, Reichgelt resigned at the direction of Regional Chancellor Sophia Wisniewska, who offered no public explanation for a move that stunned the campus St. Petersburg administrators remained mum on the case, saying that the university does not comment on personnel matters, until last week, when advised that the Crow\u2019s Nest was preparing a news story on the reasons behind Reichgelt\u2019s ouster. 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 2/19 In a written response to inquiries made by the Crow\u2019s Nest, Dr. Chitra Iyer, the associate vice chancellor for administration, said that the university reacted promptly to the complaint, investigated it thoroughly and then took \u201cprompt corrective action.\u201d Reichgelt resigned, with \u201ca substantial reduction in pay,\u201d completed the required training and continued teaching because he \u201cis a tenured faculty member,\u201d Iyer wrote. Asked if the female professor was satisfied by the university\u2019s response, Iyer responded, \u201cWe can\u2019t speak for the complainant.\u201d Reichgelt, who is teaching four online business courses this semester, declined to comment, referring the newspaper to Iyer. \u201cThe matter is settled,\u201d he said. Records show that the female professor \u2013 whose name is blacked out in the records \u2013 and Reichgelt were socializing at a bar during an off-campus event when the incident occurred. According to the professor, Reichgelt put his arm around her waist, tried to kiss her and asked her to have sex with him. His invitation \u2013 which the stunned professor rebuffed \u2013 followed what she later called \u201coverall misogynistic talk about how women have but should not have all the power when it comes to sex, how \u2018rape is one thing but sexual harassment is another,\u2019 how men are hard wired to \u2018f\u2014\u2019 and how the hunt is every bit as pleasurable as the kill.\u201d She said that Reichgelt told her that \u201cas a man, if you get the kill and get to f\u2014 the woman, that is great, but what men really want is the hunt.\u201d According to the professor, later that night, Reichgelt sent her a \u201cseemingly half-hearted, drunken text apology \u2013 \u2018Sorry probably was out of order.\u2019\u201d 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 3/19 Three weeks after the incident, the professor wrote a letter to Reichgelt that she never sent him. Instead, she shared it with university investigators. In the letter, she described her reaction to his behavior, its effect on her emotions and its potential impact on her career. \u201cAs a man, you may not be able to fully understand the sadness, disappointment, and disillusionment have felt,\u201d she wrote have worked very hard to find myself where am professionally. Like many of us in academia have sacrificed a lot of my life \u2013 my time, my energy, my family \u2013 for my career. \u201cNow, the direction my career was taking seems untenable given the irreparable damage this situation has had on our professional relationship. \u201cRight now,\u201d she continued do not feel comfortable in an environment to which have dedicated my career \u2026 Beyond my general discomfort have to live with the fear you are angry that reported this and, consequently, will attempt to sabotage me in small or covert ways. \u201cEqually fear that you, in an attempt to overcompensate for your wrongdoings, may lean toward granting me special favors that are not based on my merit. \u201cWhat fear most, though, is that you will do this to someone more vulnerable than I.\u201d According to the records, Reichgelt had two conversations with Iyer, the university administrator who led the university\u2019s investigation. In her report, dated Jan. 14, 2015, Iyer recapped the professor\u2019s allegations and her 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 4/19 anguished assertions in the lengthy letter she wrote to Reichgelt but did not send. Iyer also summarized two conversations with Reichgelt about the incident. He acknowledged, Iyer wrote, that he was drunk and tried to make a pass, which the professor rebuffed. \u201cIt was stupid and apologized \u2026 through a text message.\u201d Reichgelt was aware of his inappropriate behavior, Iyer wrote. He acknowledged he may have made the comments reported by the professor but \u201ccould not recall the exact words.\u201d According to Iyer, when asked about his comments on sexual harassment, Reichgelt said, \u201cLook have issues with interactions between men and women \u2013 it is more rules-based than being spontaneous or based on relationships. There are boundaries and probing those boundaries is not allowed.\u201d In a written response to Iyer\u2019s findings that he had violated university policies, Reichgelt acknowledged what he called \u201cmy highly inappropriate and regrettable behavior.\u201d But he also took issue with the way the investigation was conducted. He said that he was \u201cnever fully informed\u201d that a formal complaint had been filed, and wrote that would have been more careful in my comments had known that everything said could be shared\u201d with the professor. Once he learned that the professor \u201choped for a more sincere apology,\u201d Reichgelt wrote, he wanted to extend one. But twice the investigator told him to wait \u201cuntil the (investigative) process had run its course.\u201d Reichgelt also complained that Iyer had taken some of his comments out of context. He took particular exception to this quotation she attributed to him: \u201cLook have issues with 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 5/19 interactions between men and women \u2013 it is more rules based rather than being spontaneous or based on relationships.\u201d That comment, he said, was directed at \u201cpolicies related to Title and how in my view they have the potential to negatively impact the spontaneous interactions between people.\u201d While it \u201cis completely unrelated\u201d to the professor\u2019s complaint, Reichgelt wrote, \u201cfor the record do believe that creating an environment in which mothers feel compelled to tell their sons that they need to obtain a consenting text from their partners at every stage of a sexual encounter is worrisome, just as it is worrisome that fathers of African-American and biracial sons feel compelled to have \u201cThe Talk\u201d with their sons about how to behave when they are stopped by a police officer.\u201d Under the prodding of the federal government and the administration of President Barack Obama, colleges and universities around the country have stepped up their efforts to crack down on sexual harassment and assault on their campuses. At USFSP, the policies are spelled out in university guidelines, and faculty members have been directed to stress that policy in their syllabi and conversations with students. Training on the issue is conducted during orientation for new employees, Iyer said, and there is a training video on the university website. For the last two years, Student Government has sponsored events to underscore the \u201cIt\u2019s On Us\u201d pledge to take a stand on sexual assault and violence. Twice in recent months Tampa has been embarrassed by newspaper disclosures that 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 6/19 the university hired highly paid administrators without knowing they had faced charges of inappropriate sexual behavior in their previous jobs. Last month, the university acknowledged it did not know that Herb Maschner had sexually harassed a 28-year-old graduate student at Idaho State University. Last week he was removed from his post as director of a new geosciences center on the Tampa campus. He remains as a professor. In June, the university fired Samuel D. Bradley, the director of its advertising and communications department, after learning he had resigned from Texas Tech University after an investigation into his relationships with students. In response to a question from the Crow\u2019s Nest, Iyer said conducted a background check before hiring Reichgelt. \u201cWe are not aware of any evidence of this type of conduct prior to hire or since this incident,\u201d she wrote. Information from the Tampa Bay Times was used in this report. The Victim: She Feels \u2018Sadness, Disappointment, Disillusionment\u2019 Excerpts from a letter that the professor wrote to Dr. Han Reichgelt but never sent. Instead, she gave it to university investigators. Han hope you will receive this letter as it is intended, which is to be informative and to seek resolution to what has been, for me, an extremely difficult situation. Although your 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 7/19 seemingly half-hearted, drunken text apology (\u201cSorry probably was out of order\u201d) was appreciated must admit was hoping (expecting) a sober and genuine apology for the way you acted \u2026. Of course have no idea what exactly you remember about that evening, which makes this writing difficult. However write under the assumption that you have at least some recollection of your inappropriateness \u2013 asking me what motivation would need to go to bed with you, asking for \u201cjust you and I\u201d to leave the bar together, trying to kiss me, putting your arm around me and squeezing my waist, asking if wanted to \u201ctry this\u201d and, when declined, saying \u201cwe probably should wait until you are promoted,\u201d and your parting comment about how you \u201ctried hard\u201d but that your effort was wasted. And, this does not include your overall misogynistic talk about how women have but should not have all the power when it comes to sex, how \u201crape is one thing but sexual harassment is another,\u201d how men are hard wired to \u201cfuck\u201d and how the hunt is every bit as pleasurable as the kill (\u201cas a man, if you get the kill and get to fuck the woman, that is great, but what men really want is the hunt\u201d). To say the least, your words and actions made me uncomfortable. After all, you are the Regional Vice Chancellor of \u2026. Despite \u201cthe evening\u201d and despite your failure to offer a sincere apology desperately wanted to believe that your behavior did not really reflect who you are as a person or as a professional because truly care about our institution. Prior to the event had been so excited about your and Sophia\u2019s leadership and direction of the university had considered you to be an excellent Vice Chancellor was impressed with your transparency and the decency of your interactions with faculty and, prior to this situation had taken every opportunity available to me to praise you on these accounts genuinely respected you and probably what hurt me the most is that thought you respected me. In fact, naively thought our easy rapport and growing professional relationship was based on mutual respect, not a hidden sexual agenda. In light of what happened now question my judgment of our professional relationship and of your character. As a man, you may not be able to fully understand the sadness, disappointment, and disillusionment have felt, but do hope that you will try to see things from my perspective have worked very hard to find myself where am professionally. Like many of us in academia have sacrificed a lot of my life \u2013 my time, my energy, my family \u2013 for my career. 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 8/19 Now, the direction my career was taking seems untenable given the irreparable damage this situation has had on our professional relationship am not comfortable in your presence, and suspect you are not comfortable in mine, which makes my job \u2026 extremely difficult. Prior to making the decision to report your behavior was belaboring each and every interaction with you for fear that my intentions would be misperceived. Now am simply avoiding you altogether and it seems you are doing the same no longer get to enjoy the camaraderie we were developing as colleagues and that other faculty get to enjoy with you \u2013 undeniably an important part of a job that, to be successful, requires good relationships. And, while sincerely hope things will normalize in time, right now do not feel comfortable in an environment to which have dedicated my career \u2026. Beyond my general discomfort have to live with the fear you are angry that reported this and, consequently, will attempt to sabotage me in small or covert ways. Equally fear that you, in an attempt to overcompensate for your wrongdoings, may lean toward granting me special favors that are not based on my merit. What fear most, though, is that you will do this to someone more vulnerable than I. In my genuine attempt to find a place of resolution leave you with one question: How do you suggest we proceed? The Investigator: \u2018There is Sufficient Information To Support The Allegation\u2019 Excerpts from a report by Dr. Citra Iyer, who investigated the professor\u2019s allegations. Dr. Reichgelt was provided an opportunity to present his perspective and side of the story. When Dr. Reichgelt was asked \u2026 what he remembered \u2026, he responded tried to make a pass \u2026 and (she) said no.\u201d When probed further whether he recalled anything else, he said was drunk and tried to \u2026 and (she) said no.\u201d He said, \u201cIt was stupid and apologized to (her) through a text message.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 9/19 When probed further about his conduct, he denied there is any other situation out there like this and stated that this type of incident will not happen again. In response to the question relating to concern about institutional risk as a result of his behavior, Dr. Reichgelt responded,\u201d You tell me what need to do. If need to disappear, you let me know.\u201d \u2026. When asked about his drinking, he said that he is not a heavy drinker. He said that he likes to socialize over drinks, but that he does not have a drinking problem. \u2026. When asked whether he understood how his behavior had impacted (the professor), he said he was surprised by how hard (she) was taking this. He said it was not a value judgment, but rather a reflection of his own misinterpretation of (her) reaction. He said the person who would need to evaluate the future would be him, not (her). When asked how he would respond to (the professor\u2019s) question in the letter, which asked of him, \u201cIn my genuine attempt to find a place or resolution leave you with one question: How do you suggest we proceed?,\u201d Dr. Reichgelt said he could talk to (her) and ask for forgiveness. If the decision is that it is not workable, he said he would be the \u201conly person who has to disappear CONCLUSION: Dr. Reichgelt has admitted to making sexual advances and engaging in conduct that was unwelcome \u2026. While Dr. Reichgelt stated that he could not recall his exact words regarding women, he acknowledged he may have made comments, such as \u201csexual harassment is bullshit,\u201d and \u201cwe\u2019ll wait till you\u2019re promoted.\u201d Although this was a one-time incident, the totality of Dr. Reichgelt\u2019s behavior during this incident was severe. Additionally, even though there is no known existing pattern of conduct by Dr. Reichgelt in this regard, there is a significant power differential between the two parties, in addition to his comments being an aggravating factor. Dr. Reichgelt is the chief academic officer for and (the professor is) in a subordinate position \u2026 Based on the totality of the circumstance and the statements gathered, there is sufficient information to support the allegation that Dr. Reichgelt engaged in inappropriate conduct in violation of USF\u2019s Diversity and Equal Opportunity Policy #0-007 and Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Harassment Policy #0-004. 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 10/19 conclusion of cause is recommended in this matter. The Aggressor: He Acknowledges \u2018Highly Inappropriate and Regrettable Behavior\u2019 Excerpts from Dr. Han Reichgelt\u2019s written response to the university investigator\u2019s findings was never fully informed that a formal complaint had been lodged against me, or the details of the subsequent process. While fully acknowledge (the professor\u2019s) right to file a complaint, and feel no resentment or anger towards (her) for doing so would have been more careful in my comments had known that everything said could be shared with (her) \u2026. The description of the process and interviews omits what regard as important facts. For example, both in our initial conversation on December 19, and a second conversation on January 12 was instructed not to contact (the professor only became aware on December 19 that (the professor) had hoped for a more sincere apology. Naively or perhaps overly optimistically thought that (her) acknowledgement of my text \u2026 and a professional email exchange between us on a different matter afterwards meant that we were rebuilding our professional relationship would have been more than willing to issue a deeper apology as soon as became aware of (the professor\u2019s) desire for one but the conditions imposed by the investigator made this impossible \u2026. In many cases, the reports of my conversations with the investigator leave out the context in which my comments were made. For example, \u2026 the investigator writes: \u201cWhen asked whether he understood how his behavior impacted (the professor), he said he was surprised by how hard (she) was taking it.\u201d The investigator fails to mention that in the same exchange quoted from (the professor\u2019s) letter which states \u2026 \u201cAs a man, you may not be able to fully understand the sadness, disappointment and disillusionment have felt believe that the context is relevant. Also on page 3, the investigator reports that am alleged to have said: \u201cLook have issues with interactions between men and women \u2013 it is more rules-based rather than being spontaneous or based on relationships.\u201d The context in which this comment was made 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 11/19 was a conversation on policies related to Title and how in my view they have the potential to negatively impact the spontaneous interaction between people. Inclusion of the context, rather than merely quoting a few poorly formulated remarks out of context, would in my view have significantly altered the connotation of my remarks. And, although it is completed unrelated to (the professor\u2019s) complaint, for the record do believe that creating an environment in which mothers feel compelled to tell their sons that they need to obtain a consenting text from their partners at every stage of a sexual encounter is worrisome, just as it is worrisome that fathers of African-American and biracial sons feel compelled to have \u201cThe Talk\u201d with their sons about how to behave when they are stopped by a police officer. However, as said, my concerns about the atmosphere that we are in danger of creating are completing irrelevant to my highly inappropriate and regrettable behavior towards (the professor). \u2026 Finally, and most distressingly, the investigator included in her reports comments that explicitly asked her not to include was not aware that our conversations took place as part of a formal process in which all my comments could be reported. Had known would not have made them. In particular explicitly asked on both occasions for my comment about my willingness to step down not to be shared with (the professor), not because will not step down should the institute decide that this is the appropriate sanction, but because felt that sharing this comment might put pressure on (the professor) not to exercise her right to lodge a complaint against me. The fact that, according to the report, (the professor) expressed the fear that \u2026 reporting my inappropriate behavior might lead to institutional instability would seem to bear this out. (The professor) ends her letter with the sentence \u201cIn my genuine attempt to find a place of resolution leave you with one question: How do you suggest we proceed share (the professor\u2019s) desire to find a resolution but cannot see how a resolution can be reached if we continue to follow the current process and in particular continue to prohibit direct communications between (the professor) and me. 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 12/19 University Reacted Promptly and Decisively, Administrator Says Dr. Chitra Iyer, the university\u2019s associate vice chancellor for administration, issued this response to the Crow\u2019s Nest inquiry about the sexual harassment case against Dr. Han Reichgelt, the former regional vice chancellor for academic affairs takes allegations of sexual harassment seriously. Consistent with our policies and standards, as soon as we were made aware of the allegation, an investigation was initiated and measures were taken to protect the complainant. Once the facts were fully investigated, prompt corrective action was taken. As a result of these actions, Dr. Reichgelt resigned his senior leadership position, which resulted in a substantial reduction in pay. He was also required to complete training, which was accomplished. No further violations of any policies of any kind have been alleged in regard to Dr. Reichgelt since the incident in 2014. Crow\u2019s Nest: Was the professor satisfied by the university\u2019s response? \u201cWe can\u2019t speak for the complainant.\u201d CN: Was Dr. Reichgelt\u2019s background thoroughly explored before he was hired by the university? Was there any evidence that he had engaged in this kind of behavior before conducted a background check prior to hiring Dr. Reichgelt. We are not aware of any evidence of this type of conduct prior to hire or since this incident.\u201d CN: Dr. Reichgelt\u2019s photo, resume and contact information are still on the College of Business website and he answers the phone number listed there. Has his nine-month appointment as an online professor been extended? If so, for how long? \u201cDr. Reichgelt is a tenured faculty member.\u201d CN: Since the incident occurred, has the university taken additional steps to ensure that administrators, faculty and staff are aware of university policy on sexual harassment, sexual violence and other gender-based harassment? 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 13/19 \u201cTo prevent sexual harassment, sexual violence and gender-based harassment, faculty, staff and students receive Title IX, sexual harassment training and Violence Against Women\u2019s Act (VAWA) training. This is conducted at new employee orientation for employees. The training is also available in a video format on the website.\u201d Key Dates in The Reichgelt Case May 30, 2014 \u2013 The university announces the hiring of Dr. Han Reichgelt, a dean at Southern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, Ga., as regional vice chancellor of academic affairs \u2013 the top academic post on campus. Late 2014 \u2013 According to a female professor, Reichgelt makes sexual advances and vulgar comments to her while they are attending an off-campus event. She rebuffs him and files a complaint with university administrators. Dec. 19, 2014 \u2013 The university interviews Reichgelt about the incident. Jan. 12, 2015 \u2013 The university has a follow-up interview with Reichgelt. Jan. 14, 2015 \u2013 Dr. Chitra Iyer, the regional associate vice chancellor for administration, completes a report describing the allegations, Reichgelt\u2019s response, and her conclusion. \u201cThere is sufficient information to support the allegation that Dr. Reichgelt engaged in inappropriate conduct\u201d that violated the university\u2019s policies on diversity, equal opportunity and sexual misconduct/sexual harassment, Iyer writes. Feb. 5, 2015 \u2013 In a letter to the university, the female professor says Reichgelt\u2019s behavior and comments \u201cwere so blatantly misogynistic, inappropriate and unlawful that I\u2019m struggling to put this matter behind me.\u201d She feels harmed, isolated and \u201cextremely concerned about the short and long-term effects this will have upon my academic career, not to mention my personal well-being.\u201d Feb. 9 \u2013 Reichgelt acknowledges \u201cmy highly inappropriate and regrettable behavior\u201d toward the professor. But in his written response to the university\u2019s findings, he also complains that he was \u201cnever fully informed that a formal complaint had been lodged against me.\u201d He was prohibited from making \u201ca deeper apology\u201d to the victim, he writes. 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 14/19 +8 0 And some of his comments reported by Iyer omit the context, which would have \u201csignificantly altered the connotation of my remarks.\u201d Feb. 27 \u2013 Without public explanation, the university announces Reichgelt\u2019s resignation. In a letter accepting the resignation, Regional Chancellor Sophia Wisniewska says he will be moved to a nine-month appointment in the College of Business. She also directs him to complete diversity training off-campus. March 18 and April 28 \u2013 The Crow\u2019s Nest files requests under Florida\u2019s Public Records Law seeking emails to and from Wisniewska and Reichgelt in the weeks leading up to his ouster. April 15, 2016 \u2013 After delaying for 13 months, the university releases more than 1,600 pages of emails. They show Reichgelt\u2019s sudden departure followed a diversity complaint and that the university worked out a plan to limit publicity. The emails shed little light on the particulars of the case. November 2016 \u2013 Additional records obtained by the Crow\u2019s Nest show that Reichgelt was ousted following a sexual harassment complaint from the female professor. The university says he remains at as a tenured faculty member. \uf185Post Views: 9,470 Written by: Devin Rodriguez on November 21, 2016. Last revised by: Ryan CallihanApril 29, 2017. Related Posts 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 15/19 Will need a new regional chancellor soon? Christian Hardigree named a finalist for Murray State University\u2019s presidential search \uf073February 14, 2025 \uf007Alisha Durosier and Campus Rec boost access to sustainable transportation at \uf073February 13, 2025 \uf007Jenna Nicastro \uf177Previous: Climate Change: Forgotten Issue of 2016 Next: \uf178 Thrown into the Spotlight: An Interview with Laraine Ruiz Campus News News Arts and Life Campus Campus News 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 16/19 3 thoughts on \u201cSexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer\u201d G. M. Killenberg says: November 22, 2016 at 9:18 pm Congratulations to the Crow\u2019s Nest for doing what a college newspaper should do \u2014 conduct investigative reporting. News media too infrequently use freedom of information laws to unlock public records that officials try to keep confidential without justification. Here, the Crow\u2019s Nest showed local journalists how get results and publish the information responsibly. Reply Pingback budget: Deep cuts, big salaries \u2013 The Crow's Nest Eve Hunt says: June 30, 2019 at 11:59 pm You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but find this matter to be actually something which think would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I\u2019m looking forward for your next post will try to get the hang of it Reply Leave a Reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 17/19 Name * Email * Website Post Comment Recent Posts How exchange students readjusted to life in the U.S. \uf101 Wilkes\u2019 record-tying night powers Bulls to win over \uf101 Will need a new regional chancellor soon? Christian Hardigree named a finalist for Murray State University\u2019s presidential search and Campus Rec boost access to sustainable transportation at \uf101 New lieutenant governor hopes to champion inclusivity and civic engagement at \uf101 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 18/19 All Rights Reserved \u2013\u2013 The Crow's Nest 2023. Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Fairy by Candid Themes. usfcrowsnest 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual Harassment Incident Led To Ouster Of Top Academic Officer \u2013 The Crow's Nest 19/19", "7819_102.pdf": "Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader By Claire McNeill Times staff Published Nov. 22, 2016 Han Reichgelt resigned last year as St. Petersburg's new Regional Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs after a few months in the post. The reason wasn't clear until this week, when the student newspaper, the Crow's Nest, reported that he sexually harassed a professor. [Times files] Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 1/9 \u2014 Questions of sexual misconduct have plagued the University of South Florida in recent months, with two high-profile faculty members stripped of their titles after issues at previous universities surfaced. Now another sexual harassment case has surfaced with the release of new information on last year's abrupt ouster of St. Petersburg's top academic officer. Internal documents detail the sexually charged comments and propositioning of a female professor that led to Han Reichgelt's hasty and unexplained resignation in February 2015 Reichgelt tried to kiss the professor and asked what it would take for her to have sex with him, according to an internal report. The professor said Reichgelt's advances took place amid his \"overall misogynistic talk\" about how women have all the power when it comes to sex, how \"rape is one thing but sexual harassment is another,\" how men are \"hard-wired to f---\" and how \"what men really want is the hunt,\" the report said. The documents, first obtained by student newspaper The Crow's Nest, include a letter from Reichgelt acknowledging his \"highly inappropriate and regrettable behavior.\" Reichgelt, who is still employed at the school, expressed disappointment on Tuesday that the contents of the documents were not kept confidential. \"The documents speak for themselves,\" he said made a mistake was punished for it, and you know think that's that.\" Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 2/9 Reichgelt had been drinking when he made the comments in December 2014, the professor told Chitra Iyer, regional associate vice chancellor for administration and author of an internal investigation. After the professor declined Reichgelt's sexual advances, he told her, \"We should probably wait until you're promoted,\" and called his come-ons a \"waste of an effort.\" Later, the professor said she got a text from him that said, \"Sorry was probably out of order Before that night, Reichgelt had always been professional and kind, the professor wrote in a letter. Now she felt uncomfortable, fearing retaliation or undeserved special treatment. \"What fear most, though, is that you will do this to someone more vulnerable than I,\" she wrote. Ultimately, she felt obligated to report his actions. Her name was withheld. Reichgelt told Iyer he couldn't recall what exactly he had said, but knew it was \"stupid\" and inappropriate. He vowed it wouldn't happen again, and said, \"If need to disappear, you let me know.\" He also told Iyer he takes issue with the \"rules-based\" approach to interactions between men and women. \"There are boundaries and probing those boundaries is not allowed,\" he said. Iyer concluded that he had crossed a line. \"Although this was a one-time incident, the totality of Dr. Reichgelt's behavior was severe,\" she wrote. Soon after, he stepped down takes these allegations seriously, Iyer wrote in an email to the Times. She said the university's investigation was prompt, as was corrective action, while Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 3/9 protecting the complainant throughout. Sexual harassment by men in top positions has been an issue of late for the System. The university has made headlines as revelations surfaced that two faculty members were investigated for sexual misconduct at previous jobs, raising questions about the university's hiring process In late June removed Samuel Bradley as director of the Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications after finding that he tried to suppress a report detailing inappropriate relations with students at Texas Tech University. The report says one student was hospitalized for emotional distress, another delayed graduation, and Bradley's wife broke a car windshield after finding him in bed with a student commissioned an independent report that found employees had made mistakes in hiring Bradley, such as failing to request his personnel records. The university has since implemented a more rigorous hiring process. This month stripped another high-paid administrator of his title, removing Herb Maschner as head of a school technology center. Officials admitted they had not known that a previous employer found Maschner to have engaged in inappropriate, on-campus sexual behavior. Court papers say Maschner sexually harassed a graduate student at Idaho State University, forcibly kissing and groping her in October 2013. While a newspaper in Idaho readied a report on the lawsuit this fall, a year after Maschner's arrival at USF, Maschner told his boss about the harassment finding. Weeks later removed him as executive director of the new center, saying the change \"will facilitate greater productivity and success for him and his colleagues Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 4/9 Reichgelt underwent a background check before his hiring, Iyer said. She said is \"not aware of similar conduct prior to hire or since this incident.\" Before becoming USFSP's regional vice chancellor of academic affairs in summer 2014 with a salary of $190,000, Reichgelt served as dean of the school of computing and software engineering at Southern Polytechnic State University in Georgia. He had degrees in cognitive science, philosophy and psychology granted him tenure that fall. In his resignation letter eight months later, he told Chancellor Sophia Wisniewska am no longer confident that can serve you and this wonderful institution with the level of quality that you and the institution deserve.\" Wisniewska replied believe that your resignation is in the best interest of this institution.\" She told him he would be moving to a nine-month faculty appointment in what is now the Kate Tiedemann College of Business. With reduced duties, he now makes $152,505 while teaching online classes in information systems. At USFSP's direction, he has completed training in diversity, Title and the Violence Against Women Act, which new hires also complete at employee orientation said the university may discipline tenured faculty for just cause, though \"each case is different and appropriate discipline is based on the facts of the case Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 5/9 Deputy Managing Editor/Enterprise Florida teachers remind immigrant students to look past barriers Yesterday \u2022 The Education Gradebook Straz Center expands arts education with tap dance program Yesterday \u2022 Entertainment outlines plans for upcoming presidential search Yesterday \u2022 The Education Gradebook Pasco schools plan to add walls to 700 open classrooms Feb. 20 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Florida voucher group wins state approval after changing course on payments Feb. 20 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Long-struggling Tampa charter school shuts its doors Feb. 19 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Florida schools seek hurricane relief as lawmakers prepare budgets Feb. 19 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Pasco County middle school is getting a new principal Feb. 18 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Wisniewska appointed Dr. Martin Tadlock the new regional vice chancellor for academic affairs this spring. Contact Claire McNeill at [email protected] or (727) 893-8321. Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 6/9 Pinellas schools aim to recoup millions spent on hurricanes Feb. 18 \u2022 The Education Gradebook will search for new president. Here\u2019s what to expect. Feb. 18 \u2022 The Education Gradebook Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 7/9 Contact Help Chat Customer Service Submit a News Tip Contact Account Digital access Home delivery Newsletters Manage my account Donate Subscriber e-Newspaper e-Newspaper App About Times Publishing Company About us Connect with us Careers Advertise Times Total Media Media Kit Place an ad Public Notices Classifieds Best of the Best Local Ads Shop Champa Bay Shop Bucs Hardcover Book Lightning Hardcover Book Photo Reprints Article Reprints Article Licensing Historic Front Pages Meeting Backgrounds More News in Education Expos Homes Sponsored Content Special Sections Apps Podcasts Archives \u00a9 2025 All Rights Reserved Times Publishing Company Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 8/9 Privacy Policy Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 8:33 Sexual harassment prompted hasty ouster of academic leader 9/9"} |
7,530 | Sylvester Oliver | Rust College | [
"7530_101.pdf",
"7530_102.pdf",
"7530_103.pdf",
"7530_104.pdf",
"7530_105.pdf",
"7530_106.pdf",
"7530_107.pdf",
"7530_108.pdf"
] | {"7530_101.pdf": "Student Calls Professor a Rapist & Predator / August 30, 2013 OXFORD, Miss high school teacher lost his teaching license after a 16- year-old girl accused him of rape, but Rust College in Mississippi hired him anyway and he forcibly raped a student in his office, the woman claims in court. Jane Doe sued Rust College and former professor Sylvester Oliver, in Federal Court. Doe also claims the college president threatened to fire anyone who cooperated in the investigation or litigation involving her rape. Rust College is a historically black liberal arts college in Holly Springs, Miss., 35 miles southeast of Memphis. Doe says in the lawsuit that Rust College hired Sylvester twice. It let him resign after a student accused him of sexual improprieties, then he lost his teaching license for similar behavior in Memphis, then Rust hired him back and he raped Doe, she says in the complaint. \"In its student handbook, defendant Rust College touts itself as a church-related institution 'committed to the moral and social tenets prescribed by the United Methodist Church' and warns that 'any students engaging in extra and pre- marital sexual intercourse will be subject to disciplinary action,'\" the complaint states. \"The student handbook further states that situations involving sexual morality are in direct conflict with the college's mission. Regrettably, this language is not included in the institution's faculty handbook but by reasonable implication extends to the faculty of Rust College in its interactions between faculty and students.\" Colleges and universities for years have struggled with policies on teacher- student sex, as most college students are legally adults. One retired college vice president told Courthouse News that most colleges prefer to sweep the issue under the rug. \"Professors would bust a gut if we told them what they could do on their own time,\" the longtime college administrator said. In her lawsuit, Doe claims that Rust College allowed Sylvester to resign after he was accused of having \"an inappropriate sexual relationship with at least one female student.\" Sylvester then went to work for Memphis City Schools, but was fired and lost his teaching license after a 16-year-old girl accused him of raping her, Doe says in the complaint. Then, she says, Rust College hired him back. Try Litigation Reports or Log in Friday, February 21, 2025 | Back issues Log in to CasePortal Saturday, February 22, 2025 Free Litigation Reports Find Judicial Opinions 2/22/25, 8:34 Student Calls Professor a Rapist & Predator | Courthouse News Service 1/3 \"Oliver was employed with defendant Rust College in the early 2000's as a professor,\" Doe says in the lawsuit. \"During his initial tenure, defendant Oliver had an inappropriate sexual relationship with at least one female student at defendant Rust College, and was informally asked to resign from his position. \"In 2005, defendant Oliver was hired by Memphis City Schools in Memphis, Shelby County, Tenn., to serve as a teacher at Northside High School. During his tenure at Northside High, a 16-year old student reported that defendant Oliver molested her in a vacant classroom of the school. \"Following a full investigation of the 16-year-old's report of rape, which included statements of several students and a review of school security tapes, defendant Oliver was terminated by Memphis City Schools. Pursuant to Tennessee law, defendant Oliver was afforded the legal opportunity to be represented by counsel and appeal the firing and the underlying basis of the firing therefore. He ultimately chose not to pursue appeal. \"On January 26, 2006, Memphis City Schools notified the Tennessee State Board of Education's Office of Teacher Licensing and informed them that defendant Oliver had been terminated as a result of being accused of raping a student copy of the January 26, 2006 correspondence is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 ...\" Nonetheless, Doe says, Rust College rehired Sylvester. She was a Rust student in the 2012-13 school year, she says, and on Sept. 7, 2012, \"while attempting to seek advice from defendant Oliver, plaintiff was forcibly raped in his office on defendant Rust College's premises by defendant Oliver.\" Doe says that \"(s)hortly after the rape,\" she reported it to the college and to the Holly Springs Police Department. But the college did not fire Sylvester, she says. \"On October 2, 2012, defendant Oliver was indicted by a grand jury in Marshall County, Mississippi for sexual battery,\" Doe says in the complaint. \"Following his arrest, defendant Oliver voluntarily resigned his faculty post at the college.\" Doe continues: \"Based on investigation and belief, this is not the first time that defendant Oliver has sexually assaulted and/or forcibly raped a female student at Rust College. \"In fact, defendant Oliver is not the only male employee of defendant Rust College who has sexually assaulted a student or other employee at Rust College. \"David Beckley, president of Rust College, has communicated to faculty, staff, and employees of Rust College that anyone who cooperates in the investigation and/or litigation of claims arising out of plaintiff's rape will be terminated. \"Throughout his tenures at defendant Rust College, defendant Oliver used the college as a 'hunting ground' for victims of his perverted desire for sexual gratification.\" Doe claims the college fosters an environment in which male professors can sexually assault students and colleagues and get away with it. She claims Rust College turned a blind eye to Oliver's sexual exploitation of students, failed to discipline and report him to authorities, and concealed his pattern of sexual misconduct. She seeks compensatory and punitive damages for sexual battery, vicarious liability, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violations of 2/22/25, 8:34 Student Calls Professor a Rapist & Predator | Courthouse News Service 2/3 Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Connect with us on our social channels: \u00a9 2025, Courthouse News Service About Us / Masthead / Advertise / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Support federal law. She is represented by Ursula Holmes with The Cochran Firm of Memphis. Rust College Vice President Ishmell Edwards told Courthouse News the school cannot comment on pending litigation. \"Safety of our students is a primary concern of our college,\" Edwards said. \"We are very proud of our record and we will continue to focus on serving our students while maintaining the safety of our campus community.\" Categories Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world. enter your e-mail address Additional Reads Japan\u2019s manga lures French readers craving something different February 21, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Subscribe to Closing Arguments Submit 2/22/25, 8:34 Student Calls Professor a Rapist & Predator | Courthouse News Service 3/3", "7530_102.pdf": "Advertise with us Report ad By The Associated Press | Posted - Jan. 24, 2015 at 8:10 a.m. Leer en espa\u00f1ol Estimated read time: Less than a minute This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story. OXFORD, Miss civil lawsuit filed by nine women alleging sexual misconduct by a former professor at Rust College is scheduled for trial Feb. 1, 2016, in U.S. District Court in Oxford. The lawsuit alleges misconduct by former professor Sylvester Oliver dating back over a decade. Rust College in Holly Springs is named as a co-defendant. The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal reports ( the case was initiated by a Rust College student who accused Oliver of forcing himself on her in his office more than two years ago. Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court U.S. Home 0 \uea8c \ue700 \ue600 \ue954 \ue901 Save Story News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 1/7 Advertise with us Report ad U.S. The Associated Press The filing spawned both criminal and civil cases. Several other women joined the civil case as Jane Does, accusing Oliver of sexual misconduct dating back to the 1993-1994. ___ Information from: Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, Copyright \u00a9 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed Most recent U.S. stories Judge cancels Mayor Eric Adams' trial and leaves corruption charges intact until mid-March Judge extends block on Musk's from Treasury systems restores some jobs of fired employees, pledges to hire 7,700 seasonal workers Related topics News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 2/7 restores some jobs of fired employees, pledges to hire 7,700 seasonal workers New York Yankees drops ban on beards after 49 years Utah, other states file joint status report affirming constitutionality of Section 504 0 Pending Comments More stories you may be interested in 0 News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 3/7 Advertise with us Report ad 1. Utah identified as man killed in Ririe Reservoir helicopter crash 2. Baby rushed to hospital after ingesting pill found at home, police say 3. Former Colorado sheriff's deputy convicted of homicide in shooting death of man in crisis 4. Utah, other states file joint status report affirming constitutionality of Section 504 5. Salt Lake man avoids prison in sentencing for I-15 shooting in 2009 News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 4/7 6. Man, 48, hit by 2 semitrucks and killed while walking on I-84 near Idaho border 7. How Salt Lake City's tallest building aims to be an 'icon' 8. Republicans in the complicated crosshairs of and government layoffs 9. Search for toddler, mother continues in Salt Lake City amid overnight temperature concerns 10. Utah woman offered to bless items for money, but never returned property, police say Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5. Enter your email Sign Me Up By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 5/7 Advertise with us Report ad News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 6/7 \uea8c \ue700 \uea92 \ue900 \uea9d \ue903 \uea93 Mobile Apps | Newsletter | Advertise | Contact Us | Careers with KSL.com | Product Updates Terms of use | Privacy Statement Notice | Manage My Cookies Public File Report Public File Radio Public File Radio Public File | Closed Captioning Assistance \u00a9 2025 KSL.com Broadcasting Salt Lake City | Site hosted & managed by Deseret Digital Media - a Deseret Media Company News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court | KSL.com 7/7", "7530_103.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Doe v. Rust Coll Mar 18, 2015 NO. 3:14CV28 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2015) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Delegate legal research to CoCounsel, your new legal assistant. Try CoCounsel free NO. 3:14CV28 03-18-2015 2 v OLIVER, and BECKLEY, in his official capacity as President of Rust College Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/6 Presently before the court is a motion by Defendants Rust College and David Beckley to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Upon due consideration of the motion, responses, and complaint, the court is ready to rule Plaintiff, Jane Doe 2, attended Rust College, a defendant in this action, in the early 1990s. Plaintiff performed some clerical work for Defendant, Professor Sylvester Oliver, during 1993. One afternoon, Oliver allegedly asked Plaintiff to come by his office to pick up some tapes that needed to be transcribed. Plaintiff alleges that once she arrived at his office, Oliver overpowered her, pushed her down on his desk, and raped her. Plaintiff subsequently reported the attack to an administrator at Rust College. No investigation was commenced, however; nor was Oliver disciplined. Plaintiff asserts that she became pregnant as a result of the assault though she later miscarried. On February 14, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this court against Defendants Rust College, Sylvester Oliver, and David Beckley, the President of Rust College. Plaintiff asserts claims of violation of Title IX; negligence; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; premises *2 liability; and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants Rust College and David Beckley filed this motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2 complaint must contain a \"short and plain statement... showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). For a plaintiff to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, \"a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'\" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests both the legal and factual sufficiency of a plaintiff's complaint. Id. at 679. Though motions to dismiss are \"viewed with disfavor and [are] rarely granted,\" the burden rests on the plaintiff to prove her claim should go forward. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, 224 F.3d 496, 497 (5th Cir. 2000). When deciding a 12(b)(6) motion, the court \"must 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/6 limit itself to the contents of the pleadings, including attachments thereto.\" Id. at 498. To meet her burden, a plaintiff cannot rest merely on \"labels and conclusions\" or \"a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action.\" Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Instead, a plaintiff must demonstrate that facts pleaded allow the court \"to draw a reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.\" Id. at 556. In deciding whether a plaintiff has met her burden, the court \"must accept as true all of the allegations contained in a complaint,\" except for those allegations which are mere legal conclusions. Ashcroft, at 678. Any legal conclusions in a complaint must be supported by factual allegations. Id. Ultimately, plaintiff's complaint must \"nudge his claims... across the line from conceivable to plausible.\" Id. at 680 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 547 rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is the proper vehicle by which to assert a *3 limitations defense where a plaintiff's complaint shows affirmatively that his claims are time barred.\" Doe v. Linam, et al., 225 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734 (S.D. Tex. 2002) (citing Herron v. Herron, 255 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir. 1958)). 3 Defendants assert that dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against them is appropriate because Plaintiff's claims are time-barred. The court first addresses this argument in regard to Plaintiff's claim that Defendants violated Title of the Education Amendments. Rust College is a private educational institution located in Holly Springs, Mississippi. Title of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits any educational institution receiving federal financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of sex. 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq. Rust College is a recipient of federal funds and as a result is bound by Title IX. Congress, however, has not provided a statute of limitations applicable to claims brought under Title IX. The court, therefore, must \"borrow\" a limitations period from the most closely analogous state statute. DelCostello v. Int'l Bhd. Of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 158 (1983). Title claims in Mississippi borrow the three-year general personal injury limitations period. See Chestang v. Alcorn State University, 820 F. Supp. 2d 772, 777 (S.D. Miss. 2011); Miss. Code Ann. \u00a7 15-1-49. 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/6 Plaintiff's claims for negligence; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; and premises liability are also subject to Mississippi's three-year general personal injury limitations period. See Pitt v. Watkins, 905 So. 2d 553, 558 (Miss. 2005) (holding that \u00a7 15-1-49 applies to claims for negligence); Carter v. Citigroup, 938 So. 2d 809, 817 (Miss. 2006) (holding that \u00a7 15-1-49 applies to claims for negligent hiring). Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is subject to a one-year limitations period. Miss. Code Ann. \u00a7 15-1-35. See *4 also Jones v. B.L. Development Corp., 940 So. 2d 961 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006) (applying \u00a7 15-1-35 to a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress). 4 The conduct giving rise to this action occurred in 1993. In accordance with the applicable statutes of limitations, Plaintiff must have filed her claims for violation of Title IX; negligence; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; and premises liability within three years \u2014 that is, by the year 1996. In accordance with the applicable limitations period for the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, Plaintiff must have brought such claim within a year, or by the year 1994. Plaintiff, however, did not file her complaint until February 14, 2014, twenty years after the conduct occurred. Plaintiff does not dispute the applicability of the aforementioned limitations periods. Instead, Plaintiff contends that her cause of action did not accrue in 1993 but accrued years later. Plaintiff creatively argues that her injury was not the sexual assault itself but instead the Defendants' inaction when it knew of Oliver's proclivity for assaulting young females but did nothing to prevent such conduct. In essence, Plaintiff contends the \"discovery rule\" should apply to these facts. Similar arguments have been made and rejected in both federal and state courts. See Doe v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School, 302 F. App'x 386 (5th Cir. 2010); Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, 947 So. 2d 983, 986 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). 1 1 The \"discovery rule\", when applicable, tolls a statute of limitations, and the focus of the rule is on \"the time that a plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence, that it probably has an actionable injury.\" First Trust Nat'l Ass'n v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 220 F.3d 331, 336 (5th Cir. 2000). 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/6 Accrual of a federal cause of action is a matter of federal law. Frame v. City of Arlington, 657 F.3d 215, 238 (5th Cir. 2011). \"Accrual occurs the moment the plaintiff becomes aware that he has suffered an injury or has sufficient information to know that he has been injured.\" Id. At the time she was assaulted, Plaintiff was aware of her injury, the perpetrator, and the perpetrator's employer. Plaintiff also knew that Defendant had failed to act after she *5 reported the incident to Rust College administration in 1993. Plaintiff's claim for violation of Title IX, therefore, accrued in 1993, and this claim is consequently time-barred. 5 In Mississippi, a cause of action \"accrues when it comes into existence as an enforceable claim, that is, when the right to sue becomes vested.\" Bullard v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 941 So. 2d 812, 815 (Miss. 2006). In actions involving a latent injury, however, \"the cause of action does not accrue until the plaintiff has discovered or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury.\" Miss. Code Ann. \u00a7 15-1-49 latent injury is present only where a plaintiff will be precluded from discovering the injury \"because of the secretive or inherently undiscoverable nature of the wrongdoing\" in question. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co. v. Guy, 682 F.3d 381, 393 (5th Cir. 2012). The discovery rule in Mississippi applies only to the discovery of the injury and is not applicable to the discovery of the cause of the injury. Id. The discovery rule does not apply in the present case because Plaintiff was aware of her injury, both the assault and Defendants' failure to act, at the time it occurred. Plaintiff was put on notice at that time to inquire as to her possible claims against Defendants. Plaintiff's state law claims accrued in 1993 and are, therefore, untimely For the foregoing reasons, the court finds that Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is well taken and should be granted separate order in accordance with this opinion shall issue this day. This, the 18 day of March, 2015. th /s/ Neal Biggers B. BIGGERS, JR. 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/6 About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 8:34 Doe v. Rust Coll NO. 3:14CV28 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/6", "7530_104.pdf": "38\u00b0 Jackson 2 Weather Alerts In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 News Watch Live First Alert Weather (Mississippi News Now settlement is reached in a sexual misconduct case against Rust College. The school has paid an undisclosed amount of money in the civil case brought by three former students. By settling the case the college's president David Beckley and former professor Sylvester Oliver avoided going to trial. In 2013 a woman filed a federal lawsuit claiming that Oliver raped her in his campus office and that the college knew he had a history of sexually assaulting women. Eight other women joined the lawsuit dating back to 1993. Copyright 2015 MSNewsNow. All rights reserved. Settlement reached in sexual misconduct case against Rust College By Shderia Thompson Published: Oct. 12, 2015 at 3:26 2/22/25, 8:34 Settlement reached in sexual misconduct case against Rust College 1/4 Most Read Crossout | Sponsored Camper Van Deals | Search ads | Sponsored Packaging Machines | Search Ads | Sponsored Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Play Now Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Top Packaging Trends In 2024 (Take Look) Search Now Villas in Dubai | Search Ads | Sponsored Laser Cutting Machines | Sponsored dimmi-chi-chiama.it | Sponsored Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now 14 Unique Cat Breeds You Don't See Everyday \uf144 Woman killed in 18-wheeler crash on I-20 in Brandon Suspect shot after attempting to rob Jackson business \u2018Verified gang member\u2019 arrested after allegedly shooting person met on dating app \uf057 2/22/25, 8:34 Settlement reached in sexual misconduct case against Rust College 2/4 \uf144 Jackson police investigating \u2018possible homicide\u2019 after woman\u2019s body appeared to have been \u2018physically assaulted\u2019 Mississippi coroner raises money for family of woman killed while walking to work \uf144 Suspect driving stolen vehicle arrested in woods after police chase \uf144 Infant killed in crash on I-40 \uf144 Hospital patient charged after \u2018brutally\u2019 attacking nurse, breaking \u2018every bone\u2019 in her face, deputies say \uf057 Public Inspection File - 601-960-4436 Closed Captioning/Audio Description Terms of Service Privacy Policy Report Applications Advertising Non-Discrimination Certification Digital Marketing News Watch Live First Alert Weather Sports Programming Careers About Us Send In News Tips 715 South Jefferson Street Jackson 39201 (601)948-3333 2/22/25, 8:34 Settlement reached in sexual misconduct case against Rust College 3/4 \uf057 At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 2/22/25, 8:34 Settlement reached in sexual misconduct case against Rust College 4/4", "7530_106.pdf": "Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court By Associated Press Saturday, January 24, 2015 OXFORD, Miss civil lawsuit filed by nine women alleging sexual misconduct by a former professor at Rust College is scheduled for trial Feb. 1, 2016, in U.S. District Court in Oxford. The lawsuit alleges misconduct by former professor Sylvester Oliver dating back over a decade. Rust College in Holly Springs is named as a co-defendant. The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal reports ( ) the case was initiated by a Rust College student who accused Oliver of forcing himself on her in his office more than two years ago. The filing spawned both criminal and civil cases. Several other women joined the civil case as Jane Does, accusing Oliver of sexual misconduct dating back to the 1993-1994. According to the civil suit, Oliver was caught in the act of assaulting another student in 2003 and asked to resign. Rust College rehired Oliver in 2008, despite knowledge of his prior behavior. Because of that, Rust College and president David Beckley are also named as co-defendants in the federal civil case. Oliver avoided a criminal trial in November by pleading guilty to sexual battery in Marshall County Circuit Court. As part of a plea agreement, Oliver was sentenced to 15 years, suspended, and placed on five years of supervised probation. Oliver will not serve any jail time unless he violates his probation. 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 1/7 ___ Information from: Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, Copyright \u00a9 2025 The Washington Times, LLC. Please read our comment policy before commenting. New York City sues to force feds to give back $80 million in migrant money Trump fires Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman C.Q. Brown, chief of naval operations also out Judge says Musk\u2019s can access federal employee data Advertisement 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 2/7 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 3/7 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 4/7 Trump signs order using to limit Chinese investment in national security sectors Trump fires Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Supreme Court rebuffs Trump\u2019s attempt to oust special counsel \u2014 for now Trump signs order to impose retaliatory tariffs for digital taxes Theme park spotlight: Universal Epic Universe\u2019s Dark Universe The Associated Press sues Trump officials over ban from White House events 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 5/7 3 shot and killed outside Louisville, Kentucky, motor vehicle office, police say officials prepare to ditch fiction justifying Green New Deal Cost-cutting Pentagon to begin axing civilian jobs next week, officials say Kash Patel sworn in as director Trump launches probe into Maine schools after president\u2019s clash with governor over trans athletes Judge releases hold on Trump\u2019s plan to slash Vance in Munich strikes at core of leftist censorship, tyranny Trump fires 20 Biden immigration judges 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 6/7 Advertisement 2/22/25, 8:34 Date set for Rust College, Oliver civil trial in court - Washington Times 7/7", "7530_107.pdf": "29\u00b0 Memphis Closings and Delays \uf00d 7 Weather Alerts In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 Watch Live Solutions Digital Desk Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse Lawsuits expected to be filed against Rust College Published: Feb. 14, 2014 at 4:29 | Updated: Feb. 16, 2014 at 2:47 2/22/25, 8:34 Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse 1/5 Mid-South law firm announced new sexual abuse allegations against Rust College employees Friday afternoon. The accusations come after former professor, Sylvester Oliver, was arrested and indicted for allegedly raping a female student when she went to him for course advice. Oliver has not been convicted on the charge and is currently awaiting trial. The civil lawsuits are now in the hands of the federal courts. In the documents, eight new alleged victims say they were sexually abused. Lawyers at The Cochran Firm claim the college's president knew and did nothing. Six Rust College students and two staff members have now come forward with new sexual abuse allegations against former professor Oliver and another former employee. \"We actually cut it off at 1993, but we have claims back to 1978,\" noted one representative of the firm. \uf057 2/22/25, 8:34 Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse 2/5 Oliver is waiting to go to trial over a charge that he raped a student who came to him for course advice. Attorney Sam Cherry alleges Oliver left a previous job as a Memphis teacher after allegations of abusing a student there. He was never charged. Oliver's attorney denied both the criminal allegations and the new claims in the lawsuit. \"He was aware of a lot of the sexual misconduct that was occurring and did nothing,\" said Cherry. Lawyers for the firm said they would share findings with law enforcement but have not been asked. Attorneys for the alleged victims believe more people out there may have a story to tell. \"You go to these people thinking that they are people you can trust, people you can look up to, people who have your best interest at heart,\" added Cherry. Rust College's president said the school does not have an updated statement. On Thursday, officials could not comment on the pending case and said the school would continue to focus on serving students and maintaining safety. Get the latest from Action News 5 anytime: iPhone | iPad | Android Alerts | Email Alerts | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram Copyright 2014 WMC-TV. All rights reserved. Most Read Packaging Machines | Search Ads | Sponsored Crossout | Sponsored Camper Van Deals | Search ads | Sponsored Top Packaging Trends In 2024 - Take Look Search Now Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now Why You Should Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More 14-year-old at center of Amber Alert found safe \uf057 2/22/25, 8:34 Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse 3/5 \uf144 Germantown homeowner found dead after fire erupts amid police investigation \uf144 Infant killed in crash on I-40 \uf144 Devil in the Details: New revelations concerning the West Memphis Three from a former lead attorney \uf144 Gas station ordered to stop selling gas after failing test \uf144 Memphian who served 21 years in prison to help Trump admin. as \u2018pardon czar\u2019 Condemned South Carolina killer chooses to be executed by firing squad \uf144 Emmitt Martin back in custody, bond revoked after accusations of harassment \uf057 2/22/25, 8:34 Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse 4/5 \uf057 Public Inspection File - (901) 726-0501 Report Closed Captioning/Audio Description Privacy Policy Terms of Service Advertising Digital Marketing At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 Watch Live News Special Reports First Alert Weather Sports Community About Us Schedule Action News 5 1960 Union Avenue Memphis 38104 (901) 726-0555 2/22/25, 8:34 Eight lawsuits filed against Rust College employees over alleged sexual abuse 5/5", "7530_108.pdf": "Advertise with us Report ad By The Associated Press | Posted - Oct. 10, 2015 at 12:21 p.m. Leer en espa\u00f1ol Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story. TUPELO, Miss. (AP) \u2014 Rust College has paid an undisclosed sum to settle a sexual misconduct case brought by three former students at the Holly Springs campus. The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal reports ( by settling the civil case, the college, president David Beckley and former professor Sylvester Oliver avoided trial. \"The case has been settled and the terms are confidential,\" said Sam Cherry, senior partner for the Cochran Firm in Memphis that represented the women. \"Our clients are all satisfied.\" The federal lawsuit was filed in August 2013 by one woman, alleging that Oliver raped her in his campus office and that the college knew he had a history of sexually assaulting women. The lawsuit asked for $2 million in damages. Eight other women joined the lawsuit with allegations dating back to the 1993-94 school year. Skip the John Hancock Sold Verified Sellers Secured Payme Trusted Financ Rust College settles with accusers U.S. Home 0 \uea8c \ue700 \ue600 \ue954 \ue901 Save Story News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 1/7 Advertise with us Report ad In March, Senior U.S. District Judge Neal Biggers Jr. dismissed six of the claims, claiming the three-year statute of limitations had run out Attorneys for the three remaining women said they were ready to go to trial and felt the evidence would have led to a victory in the trial that was scheduled for February 2016. \"We took over 25 depositions and felt confident,\" Cherry said. \"The litigation has clearly heightened the awareness of sexual assault and sexual harassment on the campus.\" The initial complainant said Oliver raped her in his office in September 2012. She reported the assault to a college employee and got no response. She then reported it to the Holly Springs Police Department. Less than a month later, Oliver was indicted by a grand jury and resigned from the college. Jane Doe 6 said that Oliver groped her in a computer lab and later in his office. When she reported the incidents to a female and a male faculty member, both said reporting it to the administration would not do any good. In 2011, Jane Doe 7 said Oliver made sexual advances toward her. She reported it and had a meeting with several college administrators. They said the incident did not meet harassment criteria and did not discipline Oliver. This is not the first time Oliver has settled to avoid a trial. News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 2/7 U.S. The Associated Press In November 2014, Oliver avoided a criminal trial by pleading guilty to the sexual battery of Jane Doe. The plea agreement allowed him to avoid jail time \u2014 a suspended sentence and five years' probation \u2014 but he will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. ___ Information from: Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, Copyright \u00a9 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Most recent U.S. stories Judge cancels Mayor Eric Adams' trial and leaves corruption charges intact until mid-March Judge extends block on Musk's from Treasury systems restores some jobs of fired employees, pledges to hire 7,700 seasonal workers Related topics 0 Pending Comments 0 News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 3/7 Netanyahu decries release of wrong body as a ceasefire violation. Hamas pledges to investigate Utah, other states file joint status report affirming constitutionality of Section 504 US-Mexico border encounters for January dipped amid increased moves to halt illegal immigration More stories you may be interested in News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 4/7 Advertise with us Report ad 1. Utah identified as man killed in Ririe Reservoir helicopter crash 2. Baby rushed to hospital after ingesting pill found at home, police say 3. Former Colorado sheriff's deputy convicted of homicide in shooting death of man in crisis 4. Utah, other states file joint status report affirming constitutionality of Section 504 5. Salt Lake man avoids prison in sentencing for I-15 shooting in 2009 6. Man, 48, hit by 2 semitrucks and killed while walking on I-84 near Idaho border 7. How Salt Lake City's tallest building aims to be an 'icon' 8. Republicans in the complicated crosshairs of and government layoffs 9. Search for toddler, mother continues in Salt Lake City amid overnight temperature concerns 10. Utah woman offered to bless items for money, but never returned property, police say News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 5/7 Advertise with us Report ad News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 6/7 \uea8c \ue700 \uea92 \ue900 \uea9d \ue903 \uea93 Mobile Apps | Newsletter | Advertise | Contact Us | Careers with KSL.com | Product Updates Terms of use | Privacy Statement Notice | Manage My Cookies Public File Report Public File Radio Public File Radio Public File | Closed Captioning Assistance \u00a9 2025 KSL.com Broadcasting Salt Lake City | Site hosted & managed by Deseret Digital Media - a Deseret Media Company News Sports Beyond Series Brandview Radio Obituaries 25 2/22/25, 8:35 Rust College settles with accusers | KSL.com 7/7"} |
8,484 | Yuval Peres | University of Washington | [
"8484_101.pdf",
"8484_102.pdf",
"8484_103.pdf",
"8484_104.pdf"
] | {"8484_101.pdf": "Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis / AGGIE. Professor Yuval Peres, facing allegations of sexual harassment, recently gave a lecture hosted by Mathematics Department at the Mathematical Sciences Building on the Davis campus. Peres, who worked at Berkeley for over a decade, left position at University of Washington under threat of investigation Updated at 11:21 p.m. on Dec. 5, 2019 Yuval Peres, a mathematics professor known for his work in the probability research field, gave a lecture at Davis on Wednesday, Nov. 6. Peres, who previously worked as a professor at the Berkeley from 1993 to 2006; as an unpaid affiliate at the University of Washington (UW) from 2006 to 2012; and as a researcher in the Microsoft Theory Group from 2006 to 2018, has been publicly accused by three women of sexual misconduct. Peres did not respond to The California Aggie\u2019s requests for comment regarding the allegations against him. He had previously addressed his behavior in an email from November 2018 regret all cases in the past where have not followed this principle [of not making invitations to junior researchers that may be viewed as intimate],\u201d he said in a recently publicized letter to a group of mathematics professors had no intention to harass anyone but must have been tone deaf not to recognize that was making some people very uncomfortable. As wrote above promise to adhere to this principle in the future.\u201d Abigail Thompson, the current chair of the math department at Davis, which advertised the lecture on its website, said that the department is currently \u201caddressing this issue.\u201d She said she did not know who in the department knew about the allegations against Peres before he was invited to campus, though she did acknowledge via email that \u201csome people in the department were aware of the allegations several days before the event took place.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis - The Aggie 1/5 Peres\u2019 accusers include Dana Moshkovitz, an associate professor of computer science at the University of Texas, Austin; Animashree Anandkumar, the Bren professor of computing and mathematical sciences at CalTech and Lisha Li, the founder and of Rosebud AI, a company that produces tools to create and edit photographs and videos. The Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action confirmed that Peres resigned from his affiliate position in 2012 \u201cafter receiving notice that the university would be investigating allegations of sexual harassment source stated that Peres had left the Microsoft Theory Group and that the company had nothing further to share about his time there. Moshkovitz said that she was harassed by Peres while still a Ph.D. student at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel in 2007. In a 2009 public statement, Moshkovitz said that she had first met Peres as an undergraduate student in 2004 while touring the U.S. \u201c[The trip] influenced my life in many ways did not expect,\u201d Moshkovitz wrote. \u201cSome of those ways were quite unfortunate.\u201d While in the U.S., Peres was friendly and introduced her to his family and his colleagues, with no indication of the behavior that was to come. In 2007, Moshkovitz received an email from Peres saying that he was in the U.S. and wanted to meet regarding her postdoctoral studies. Moshkovitz agreed to the meeting. In her statement, Moshkovitz wrote that Peres moved their meeting from a coffee house to his home, where he offered her wine, even though she told him she did not drink alcohol. He then sat close to her on the sofa and repeatedly grabbed her hand, insinuating that her behavior in 2004 had led him to view their interactions in a romantic light. When Moshkovitz tried to leave, he followed her out of the house. \u201cHe told me that he was sorry, he misinterpreted my behavior,\u201d Moshkovitz wrote was quite stunned by this last remark. That man had invited me to a \u2018job interview.\u2019 He had pretended it was a job interview for almost the entire meeting acted like a person in a job interview, which thought was, until realized otherwise. This must have misinterpreted your behavior\u2019 is outrageous.\u201d Moshkovitz said that although she was supported by friends and family after the incident, the experience \u201cundermined her trust in people.\u201d She added that \u201csexual harassment is not about sex. It is not about love. Sexual harassment is about hunting down.\u201d Moshkovitz said she contacted officials at the Microsoft Theory Group in Redmond, Wash., where Peres was working at the time. She received an email saying that they were \u201cconcerned about what happened and that [they] were looking into it,\u201d however, she said she never heard from them again. She later learned that Peres had been promoted shortly after the incident. Microsoft has faced criticism for its treatment of women. According to a 2018 article in the Seattle Times, it remains a predominantly male-dominated tech company, compared to Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and LinkedIn. In the company\u2019s \u201cengineering ranks,\u201d the higher the pay grade, the fewer women there are. Between 2009 and 2018, 16 women sued Microsoft in both state and federal courts for \u201cgender discrimination, sexual harassment, or gender- related retaliation.\u201d Microsoft won only one of the cases that went to trial. And, according to The Guardian, \u201cBetween 2010 and 2016, women in technical jobs at the company lodged 108 complaints of sexual harassment, 119 complaints of gender discrimination, eight complaints of retaliation and three complaints of pregnancy discrimination.\u201d In the Seattle Times article, one Microsoft intern said no charges were filed after she reported to both the company and the police that she was raped by another intern after an event. Another woman alleged that her manager repeatedly propositioned her and sent her inappropriate emails. After she reported the behavior, she was moved to a different unit, only to find that her office was \u201cjust two doors down from her harasser.\u201d Another female employee was confronted by her supervisor after reporting his \u201cdemeaning behavior\u201d and \u201cunfair performance reviews.\u201d Following the publication of the Seattle Times article, Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith provided \ue809 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis - The Aggie 2/5 a summary of the company\u2019s efforts regarding diversity and inclusion, citing the progress the company has made in the last several years. Christopher Hoffman, a current professor at who frequently visited the Microsoft Theory Group to work on projects, had heard from several sources that Peres was attempting to \u201cre-integrate himself back into the mathematical community\u201d following the allegations am a big believer in forgiveness, but before we get to a stage of forgiveness there has to be some honesty about the women who he harassed and the lies that Yuval told to enable their harassment,\u201d Hoffman said think the math community would be making a big mistake if they re-integrated someone and started the forgiving progress before there was any honest appraisal of what had happened.\u201d Hoffman did postdoctoral studies with Peres at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem from 1996\u20131997, and later worked with him at UW. He said that Peres was \u201cvery generous towards [him],\u201d and found his later resignation from abrupt, adding that he received no explanation from the university for his departure. He did not hear about the sexual misconduct allegations until later. \u201cThe more information heard and the more detailed [the allegations have] become, definitely, the more upsetting they\u2019ve been,\u201d Hoffman said. \u201cThe first things that heard were all very vague and third-hand and now I\u2019ve read statements that people have written and that was definitely much more upsetting than just hearing rumors.\u201d Peres\u2019 pattern of behavior was not limited to his time at UW. In November 2019, Lisha Li, a former Ph.D. student at Berkeley, said on Twitter that she and another graduate student studying probability both experienced similar harassment. \u201cAbout time it is called out so that no more students are harassed,\u201d Li wrote. Animashree Anandkumar, a professor at CalTech, wrote on Twitter in November 2018 that she \u201chad a nauseating experience with Peres when [she] was younger,\u201d adding that at the time she \u201cwas junior and felt powerless.\u201d Lior Pachter, who worked as a mathematics professor at Berkeley from 2001 to 2017, and who now works as a Bren professor of computational biology, computing and mathematical sciences at CalTech, said via email that concerns were raised in the equity committee of the math department at Berkeley after Peres had left his full- time position at the university. When asked why he did not immediately file a report regarding Peres\u2019 behavior, Pachter said that he felt the report was already being adequately addressed by the committee handling such concerns. Following a public records request by The Aggie Berkeley said it had no information regarding any sexual misconduct by Peres. Thomas Scanlon, who currently chairs the equity committee in the math department at Berkeley, said in an email that he heard about Peres\u2019 behavior only after Peres had gone to work at and his position at Berkeley had converted to adjunct status. The departmental website indicates that Peres held an adjunct position at Berkeley until 2011. \u201cIt is not the role of the equity advisor to address complaints of misconduct,\u201d Scanlon said. \u201cIn practice, most complaints pass through the Department Chair. Since do not have firsthand knowledge of how such reports were investigated by our administration, it is best that not speculate on what may have happened.\u201d After he was contacted by The Aggie, Michael Hutchings, who was recently appointed as mathematics department chair at Berkeley, wrote that he \u201cwould not help [\u2026] try to dig up rumors and allegations about the Berkeley math department.\u201d Later, after Peres resigned from and no longer worked at Microsoft, Pachter chose to publicize a November 2018 letter written by computer science, applied mathematics and mathematics professors Irit Dinur, Oded Goldreich and Ehud Friedgut, who currently work at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. The letter warned the mathematical community about allegations that had been made about Peres and alleged that Dinur, Goldreich and Friedgut knew of \u201cat least five additional cases of him approaching junior female scientists, some of them students, with offers of intimate nature, behavior that has caused its victims quite a bit of distress since these offers were \u2018insistent.\u2019\u201d Goldreich said via email that he disagreed with the publication of the email. When asked why he had chosen to publish the letter, Pachter said that \u201cit corroborated for me what had heard. When saw this letter from a lot of \ue809 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis - The Aggie 3/5 these colleagues thought should make this public [\u2026] because it\u2019s dangerous to have a sexual harasser working with students thought that students should know.\u201d In December 2018, the Centre de Recherches Math\u00e9matiques at the Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al released a statement condemning Peres\u2019 actions. They said they were not aware of the allegations against him when he was the Andr\u00e9- Aisenstadt Chair at the Centre. Goldreich clarified in an email that while he and his colleagues have no official documentation about Peres, \u201cWe acted based on information revealed to us, in person and privately, directly and indirectly, by several of [Peres\u2019] victims. The dilemma we were facing was whether or not to remain [silent] in [the] face of this information, which we considered reliable although it was not subjected to any formal legal procedure.\u201d Goldreich wrote that this feeling was not unique \u2014 others had faced the same moral dilemma. \u201cWe believe that many others in the research community, who have (directly or indirectly) heard of similar [incidents] involving Peres or other people, faced the same dilemma,\u201d Goldreich said. \u201cThe choice of doing nothing is a default one, but it has a huge cost in a reality in which there are no adequate ways of handling such instances, which are not [in the] realm of criminal law.\u201d Goldreich noted that many victims have legitimate reasons for choosing not to file complaints. He said that the current social climate in academia affects who chooses to formally complain to supervisors about this behavior. \u201cThe aforementioned refusal [to file a complaint] should not cast doubts on the allegations nor should it be viewed as a personal (moral or ethical) failure on the part of the victims; it is actually the rational choice given this reality,\u201d Goldreich wrote. Karen Kelsky, founder and president of The Professor Is In, \u201cwhich provides advice and consulting services on the academic job search and all elements of the academic and post-academic career,\u201d wrote to The Aggie about the impact that sexual harassment can have on women pursuing careers in academia. \u201cWhat my research on sexual harassment in the academy revealed to me is that harassers (almost entirely men) have multiple kinds of impact on their victims (almost entirely women),\u201d Kelsky wrote. \u201cThey might impact career options, in that women are forced to change programs or institutions or fields, to their own detriment (perhaps losing grant support or mentorship or years of credit along the way).\u201d She noted that such experiences can have serious effects on women\u2019s mental health and can deter them from pursuing job opportunities at institutions of higher education. According to Kelsky, \u201ca strong, unequivocal response\u201d is necessary to ensure that survivors are not those who end up facing professional and personal consequences because of their choice to, or not to, report. \u201cTime and again, these perpetrators, even when found guilty, are permitted to rehabilitate themselves after just a few months or years, and given the chance to reclaim their authority and status,\u201d Kelsky wrote. \u201cThat not only re- victimizes victims, but gives the perpetrator access to new victims, and tells other vulnerable individuals that they are not safe, and that they do not really \u2018belong\u2019 in academic spaces.\u201d She described the ripple effect that this kind of institutional decision-making can have. \u201cIn the end we are all impoverished because one perpetrator often silences scores or hundreds of people whose scholarly contributions the world will never get to know,\u201d Kelsky said. \u201cThis is why created the #MeTooPhD hashtag.\u201d Hoffman similarly believes that academic institutions need to be more proactive in the way that they handle allegations of sexual misconduct hope that [universities] do not just try to end their affiliation but try to actively make sure that the complaints of victims are investigated,\u201d he said. Written by: Rebecca Bihn-Wallace \u2014 [email protected] Correction previous version of this article incorrectly characterized Mathematics Department Chair Abigail Thompson\u2019s understanding of the department\u2019s knowledge of the allegations levied against Peres. Thompson did not state whether or not anyone in the department was aware of the allegations before the event took place. When asked if \u201canyone in the department [was] aware of these allegations before [Peres] was invited,\u201d she responded \ue809 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis - The Aggie 4/5 do not know who was aware.\u201d Thompson additionally clarified that \u201csome members of the department were aware of the allegations several days before the event took place.\u201d The Aggie regrets this error. \ue809 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis - The Aggie 5/5", "8484_102.pdf": "Bits of Reviews and commentary on computational biology by Lior Pachter An outrage at Davis November 6, 2019 in sexual harassment | by Lior Pachter Yesterday found out via a comment on this blog that Yuval Peres, a person who has been accused by numerous students, trainees, and colleagues of sexual harassment, will be delivering a lecture today in the Davis Mathematical Physics and Probability Seminar. The facts am aware of at least 11 allegations by women of sexual harassment by Yuval Peres (trigger warning: descriptions of sexual harassment and sexual assault): 1. Allegation of sexual harassment of a Ph.D. student in 2007. Source: description of the harassment by the victim. 2. Allegation of sexual harassment by a colleague that happened when she was younger. Source: description of the harassment by the victim. 3. Allegation of sexual harassment of a woman prior to 2007. Source: report on sexual harassment allegations against Yuval Peres by the University of Washington (received via a Freedom of Information Act Request). 4. Allegation of sexual harassment by one of Yuval Peres\u2019 Ph.D. students several years ago. Source: report on sexual harassment allegations against Yuval Peres by the University of Washington (received via a Freedom of Information Act Request). 5. Allegation of sexual harassment of a colleague. Source: personal communication to me by the victim (who wishes to remain anonymous) via email after wrote a post about Yuval Peres. 6. Allegation of sexual harassment of a graduate student. Source: personal communication to me by the victim (the former graduate student who wishes to remain anonymous) via email after wrote a post about Yuval Peres. 7. Recent allegations of sexual harassment by 5 junior female scientists who reported unwanted advances by Yuval Peres to persons that leading figures in the community describe as \u201cpeople we trust without a shred of doubt\u201d. Source: a letter circulated by Irit Dinur, Ehud Friedgut and Oded Goldreich. The details offered by these women of the sexual harassment they experienced are horrific and corroborate each other. His former Ph.D. student (#4 above) describes, in a harrowing letter included in the University of Washington Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) disclosed report, sexual harassment she experienced over the course of two years, and many of the details are similar to what is described by another victim here. The letter describes sexual harassment that had its origins when the student was an undergraduate (adding insult to injury the University of Washington did not redact her name with the disclosed report had extreme difficulty 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 1/15 reading some of the descriptions, and believe the identity of the victim should be kept private despite the University of Washington report, but am including one excerpt here so that it\u2019s clear what exactly these allegations entail (the letter is 4.5 pages long): Trigger warning: description of sexual harassment and sexual assault \u201cWhile walking down a street he took my hand took it away with pressure but he grabbed it by force was pretty afraid of getting in a fight with my PhD advisor. He stroked my hand with his fingers said stop, but he ignored it started talking about math intending to make the situation less intimate. But he used me being distracted and put his arms around my waist touching my bud was in shock. We came by a bench. He asked me to sit down removed his hands and sat down far from him. He came closer and told me that had a body like a barbie doll changed topic again to math, but he took my hand and kissed the back of my hand freed my hand with a sudden move, and saw him leaning towards me touching my hair and trying to kiss me felt danger and wanted to go home. Yuval was again holding my hand, but this time there was no resistance from me thought if let him hold my hand it is less likely that he harms me. Arriving at my home he tried to give me a kiss was relieved when he drove away.\u201d The victim sent this letter to the chairs of the mathematics and computer science departments at the University of Washington and made a request am not the only female who was sexually harassed by Yuval Peres and am convinced that was not the last one. Therefore hope with this report that you take actions to prevent incidents like this from happening again.\u201d Instead of passing on the complaint to Title IX, and contrary to claims by some of Yuval Peres\u2019 colleagues that appear in the University of Washington disclosure report that the case was investigated, the chairs of the University of Washington math and computer science departments (in a jointly signed letter) offered Yuval Peres a path to avoiding investigation: \u201cAs you know from our e-mail to you [last week], your resignation as well as an agreement not to seek or accept another position at the University will eliminate the need for the University to investigate the allegations against you.\u201d Indeed, Yuval Peres resigned within two months of the complaint with no investigation ever taking place. This is the email the victim received afterwards from the chair of the mathematics department, in response to her request that hope with this report that you take actions to prevent incidents like this from happening again\u201d: 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 2/15 believe this resolution [Yuval Peres\u2019 resignation] has promptly and effectively addressed your concerns.\u201d At least 8 women have since claimed that they were sexually harassed. Seminar and a dinner As is customary with invited speakers, the organizer of the seminar today wrote to colleagues and student in the math department at Davis on Monday letting people know that \u201cthere will be a dinner afterward, so please let me know if you are interested in attending.\u201d Here is a description of a dinner Yuval Peres took his Ph.D. student to, and a summary of the events that led to him and his Ph.D. student walking down the street when he forcibly grabbed her hand: Trigger warning: description of sexual harassment and sexual assault tried to keep the dinner short, but suddenly he seemed to have a lot of time. He paid in cash in contrast to dinners with other students, and offered to take me home. In his car half way to my place he said he would only take me home if show him my room was living in a shared apartment with other people thought it was a joke and said no. He laughed and grabbed my hand. Arriving at home said goodbye. But when got out of the car he said that promised to show him my room said that did not. However, he followed me to the backdoor of the house. Fortunately some of my roommates were at home. It bothered Yuval that we were not alone at my home, so he said we should take a walk outside felt uncomfortable but still needed to talk about my PhD thesis work. While walking down the street he took my hand took it away with pressure but he grabbed it with force wonder how many graduate students at Davis will feel comfortable signing up for dinner with Yuval Peres tonight, or even be able to handle attending his seminar after reading of all the sexual harassment allegations against him? The challenge is particularly acute for women know this from comments in the reports of sexual harassment that I\u2019ve read, from the University of Washington disclosed report, and from personal communication with multiple women who have worked with him or had to deal with him. Isn\u2019t holding seminars (which are an educational program) that women are afraid to attend, and are therefore de facto excluded from and being denied benefit of, in a department that depends heavily on federal funding, a Title violation? Title federal law states that 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 3/15 43 comments Comments feed for this article November 6, 2019 at 3:34 pm Davis grad student November 7, 2019 at 12:59 pm Concerned mathematician November 8, 2019 at 11:12 am Lior Pachter November 9, 2019 at 3:34 am Please Stop. November 9, 2019 at 9:21 am Alex Jones Thank you for this post, we have notified all grad students of these allegations and linked your post(s). Reply Invited as seminar speaker at Stony Brook University 11/14/2019 LocationID=41 Reply I\u2019ve received word that the seminar has been canceled. Reply What you may not realize is that your repeated efforts to destroy this man\u2019s reputation (which assume are well- intentioned) carry a lot of collateral damage for his many female coauthors. Enough is enough, please stop already. Reply Lior was with you until the near end of the post. Of course, no women are being excluded from the seminar. They are \u201cNo person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.\u201d An opinion It\u2019s outrageous that Davis\u2019 math department is hosting Yuval Peres for a seminar and dinner today. [Update November 10th, 2019: after reading this post a former Ph.D. student at Berkeley wrote that \u201cAnother PhD student in Berkeley probability and both experienced this as well. About time this is called out so no more new students are harassed.\u201c] 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 4/15 November 9, 2019 at 10:04 am Lior Pachter November 9, 2019 at 11:08 am Alex Jones free to go and focus on the (probably beautiful) math that Yuval discusses. Is the fact that they feel they cannot go a title violation? Let\u2019s change the situation and instead say that Yuval was an ordinary mathematics professor (or researcher) but wrote a blog about how to pick up (not necessarily mathematical) girls at bars. Would you say that him writing the blog is now a title violation if some women would feel uncomfortable going to a seminar in which he was the speaker due to the blog agree that Yuval should absolutely not have been invited to give a talk. However think saying it is a title violation because women are being excluded is completely ridiculous. Reply First, a quote from the report. It is from a (female) professor: \u201cI, myself, though never harassed by Yuval, was extremely uncomfortable in going to any conference he was invited to talk in, and even to attend, after heard of his continuing misbehavior a few years ago. What should do or say simply didn\u2019t want to be out there, out of solidarity with women knew were harassed, as well as of general discomfort with the absurdity and the unethical situation. As a result __intentionally__ avoided several lectures and also a conference in [REDACTED] when knew he was going to be there.\u201d Second, in mathematics in general, and in this case in particular, a \u201cseminar\u201d is an event that combines a lecture with a dinner. The dinner involves close proximity and interaction with the speaker. One might sit next to him. (Beautiful) mathematics is not the only topic of conversation at dinner. Furthermore, access to the speaker is a key part of the \u201cseminar\u201d event. It provides professional access to students and faculty. It is a benefit. So no, this is not just about listening to \u201c(probably beautiful) math will not engage in your ill-specified hypothetical do think that it\u2019s highly problematic when faculty behave in ways that make it very difficult, impossible, or dangerous, for students of a certain group to interact with them. What exactly does or does not rise to a Title violation do not know. I\u2019m no expert asked a question. My understanding from your comment is that your answer to my question is no. Reply Thank you for the response Lior. It seems, though, that you completely missed my point. Never did say that mathematics was the only part of the seminar. My only point was that women are not being excluded. You did not *just* ask a question; while asking a 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 5/15 November 9, 2019 at 5:41 pm Lior Pachter November 10, 2019 at 1:06 pm eventhisoneistaken November 11, 2019 at 7:06 am Lior Pachter November 11, 2019 at 7:10 am eventhisoneistaken question, you made a statement when you said \u201cIsn\u2019t holding seminars (which are an educational program) that women are afraid to attend, and are therefore de facto excluded from\u201d. The question \u201cwhen did you stop beating your wife?\u201d contains a statement as well. The point of the hypothetical is to show the difference between women feeling uncomfortable going somewhere and them being excluded. Of course, the fear of being sexually harassed doesn\u2019t compare to the uncomfortability felt being near someone who writes a blog about how to pick up girls, but the point is the same. And by the way doubt anyone thinks Yuval will behave inappropriately at the dinner given all that has happened (and doubt he ever behaved very inappropriately in a big group setting). I\u2019ve visited many math departments in my career and while some are healthy and equitable environments, I\u2019ve unfortunately encountered too many situations where think it was legitimate to ask \u201cwhen will you (math department consisting almost entirely of men) stop beating your wife (female graduate students, postdocs and faculty who are routinely subjected to sexual harassment and assault)?\u201d But wait, it gets worse! metoo squared Israeli men are generally not known to be delicate snowflakes, but these two sure are horrified easily. [Omer find to be rather horrific\u201d; Lior: \u201cexperienced [\u2026] horrific\u201d.] Both Lior and Omer played an active role in the #canceling of Yuval Peres, and for the record, we judge that in this bout of horrified posts, Omer \u2026 Continue reading 12 posttenuretourettes Do read the whole thing to the end. Reply Have you coauthored any preprints or papers with Yuval Peres? Reply What difference would that make? At this point, the bigger story is you, not 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 6/15 November 12, 2019 at 11:37 am Anon November 12, 2019 at 11:40 am eventhisoneistaken November 12, 2019 at 8:49 am Elizabeth Batory Yuval. You really believe that there are people out there who will find this idiocy enthralling, don\u2019t you. It\u2019s almost sad. Reply \u2026 says the guy I\u2019m considering banning from my blog for repeated trolling. While it is very kind of Professor Pachter to bring this to our attention am a little puzzled. While Professor Peres had certainly displayed poor judgment am not aware of any criminal proceeding against him, or am aware of any retaliation he might have undertaken against people who had rebuffed him. (of course, if Professor Pachter is aware of either would be delighted to hear of it). So, bad judgment it is. Now, what is Professor Pachter proposing? Is he advocating a complete boycott of Professor Peres? Does this extend to not citing his papers? Not buying the (excellent) books he has coauthored? If we are to cite Professor Peres\u2019 papers, then our graduate students will benefit greatly from talking to Professor Peres in person (even more so because he is one of the leading probabilists of the last thirty or so years). If Professor Pachter advocates the complete erasure of Professor Peres from mathematics and computer science, surely this would extend to the erasure of Pontryagin and Vinogradov (persecuted Jews in the Soviet Union), Teichmuller and Bieberbach (Nazis), Lorentz (Nazi), Bloch (axe murderer), Severi (fascist), R. L. Moore (racist), J. J. Silvester (physically abused his students), all the ancient greeks (owned slaves), William Thurston and J.E. Fornaess (married their graduate students, so they must have exhibited even worse judgment than Professor Peres)? Or does Pachter follow in the steps of Teichmuller, who was instrumental in banning Edmund Landau from his Professorship at Gottingen, but would come to Landau for private seminars, since he believed he (Teichmuller) had a sufficiently strong moral constitution to avoid pollution by the Jew Landau await clarification anxiously. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 7/15 November 12, 2019 at 8:55 am eventhisoneistaken November 12, 2019 at 9:06 am Elizabeth Batory November 12, 2019 at 10:31 am Anon November 12, 2019 at 10:30 am Anon November 12, 2019 at 10:47 am Elizabeth Batory November 12, 2019 at 11:36 am Anon November 12, 2019 at 11:41 am Elizabeth Batory The ancient Greeks didn\u2019t just \u201csexually harass\u201d their students \u2014 they elevated shtupping them to a philosophical ideal! Reply You are correct. The most famous instance of this was Socrates\u2019 relationship with Alcibiades (see Plutarch\u2019s biography of the latter). Wow, sexual harassment must be good then! This makes sense to me because my brain works very good. Ah, yes, the well-known principle that anything which is not criminal is perfectly fine. How could Pachter have forgotten about this. Reply Dearest Anon am afraid that you are either very dense, or are trolling. If you were to actually read my comment, you will see that many people mentioned actually did commit crimes (including crimes against humanity), and so the question stands even if you believed that Professor Peres\u2019s behavior was tantamount to a crime against humanity (do you?) You began your comment with am not aware of any criminal proceeding against him\u201d. If the point was not to minimize Peres\u2019 actions, what was it? As for the rest, well, it\u2019s all very stupid since Pachter has never suggested anything remotely resembling what you\u2019re talking about. My point was to put Peres\u2019 actions in context. However, since your point seems to be to insult have no interest in continuing this conversation. Have a nice life, dearest Anonymous Coward! 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 8/15 November 16, 2020 at 3:31 pm Elizabeth Batshottery November 12, 2019 at 11:06 am eventhisoneistaken November 12, 2019 at 11:42 am Elizabeth Batory November 12, 2019 at 6:37 pm Alex Jones \u201cOthers were bad, so we should ignore this one.\u201d Well, you obviously stepped outside for a when the rest of us were learning logic, or was it ethics. Just to finish up with your stupidity, you whined hysterically about someone below \u201cposting anonymously\u201d. Are you trying to tell us we should believe you are posting with your real name and it just happens to be Elizabeth Batory? Reply Posting anonymously is fine and good (if do say so myself), but it does help to stick to a consistent unique handle, so we know if we\u2019re dealing with a single or multiple personalities. (This does not exclude the possibility that the multiple personalities occupy the same skull.) Or it would if the specimen in question had ever uttered an interesting or original thought, which is not the case. Reply Our anonymous friend\u2019s only interest is to troll and derail the conversation, so while what you are saying is correct, it is of no interest to it. Reply am not aware of any criminal proceeding against him\u201d. \u2013> \u201cName search\u201d under \u201cSearch for a person\u201d \u2013> \u201caccept\u201d (at bottom of page) \u2013> Peres, Yuval, Enter code, \u201cSubmit don\u2019t speak for Pachter, but here are my best guesses. \u201cNow, what is Professor Pachter proposing? Is he advocating a complete boycott of Professor Peres?\u201d Yes, in the sense of banning *him* from the community. \u201cDoes this extend to not citing his papers? Not buying the (excellent) books he has coauthored?\u201d No. No. \u201cIf we are to cite Professor Peres\u2019 papers, then our graduate students will benefit greatly from talking to Professor Peres in person (even more so 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 9/15 November 20, 2019 at 10:21 am valuevar December 5, 2019 at 9:29 pm Lior Pachter December 7, 2019 at 10:13 pm Lior Pachter December 25, 2019 at 12:45 am Yuval Peres because he is one of the leading probabilists of the last thirty or so years).\u201d Okay. That is a downside to the boycott. The upside is an increased confidence that he won\u2019t harass anyone else in the community and to show that there are consequences for sexual harassment. \u201cIf Professor Pachter advocates the complete erasure of Professor Peres from mathematics and computer science, surely this would extend\u2026\u201d This whole paragraph is moot, because the \u201cif\u201d condition you gave does not hold presume (as explained above await clarification anxiously hope you have it. If the aim is to keep Peres from harassing others, and perhaps refraining from giving the impression that he is welcome in some sort of \u201cclub\u201d, yet we still want students and colleagues to be able to talk to him in person, then the solution could be simply to invite him for a seminar, state explicitly that there will be *no* seminar dinner or other social activities, and arrange for him to meet with students and colleagues only under senior supervision, with this fact being known to both students and colleagues. If judged necessary, he can also be privately told that he should not seek social contact with people in the department agree that there should be consequences for poor behavior, but there have already been very serious consequences of a different kind. Reply Rebecca Binh-Wallace has written an article about YP\u2019s visit to the Davis math department: Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis Reply The link works. As it stands your comment is just a link to infowars. So will delete it. Reply Could we take some action about his mathoverflow activity as well 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 10/15 December 27, 2019 at 12:03 pm Tim Bonners January 7, 2020 at 12:42 pm Dog Patch 6 January 7, 2020 at 2:24 pm PhD Student January 7, 2020 at 2:49 pm Student January 8, 2020 at 4:34 am Anon He frequently interacts with grad students via his posts there as well think this helps him integrate back into the community without ever addressing the pain he has caused. Reply don\u2019t like that suggestion think he should not be allowed to integrate back into the academia community yet, via talks at seminars, etc, but don\u2019t think he should be banned from using a website, such as math overflow. Reply find this whole post and thread to be disgusting. You have gone out of your way to try to destroy a man\u2019s reputation. Yuval is a brilliant mathematician, eccentric at times, yes, but a brilliant mathematician. Reply OK. How about you ask university\u2019s administrators how this pimple-faced imbecile got into this country in the first place? Reply OK. How about you ask university\u2019s administrators about how this pimple faced imbecile even got into the country in the first place the \u201cnumber 1 student\u201d from university view=bio Reply Being eccentric does not include abusing power or sexually harassing anyone! Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 11/15 January 12, 2020 at 12:55 am Anon 2020 January 12, 2020 at 12:35 pm Lavuy Serep January 16, 2020 at 2:27 am Caveman find comments and reactions of the type made by Dog Patch above both confusing and disappointing am confused because the issue here is not Yuval\u2019s merits as a mathematician, but his actions as a human. Shall we accept all poor behavior from those who excel at one skill or another? While well accomplished as a mathematician, Yuval clearly needs to take his current time-out and reflect on how to be a better person do not advocate for a life-time ban, but clearly it is not yet time for business as usual without some reflection and discussion on what Yuval did. Finally don\u2019t understand the comment that it is Lior who has ruined Yuval\u2019s reputation. The only person who did that is Yuval, by his own actions. And the evidence shows it was not one lapse of judgement, but a continued pattern, with many opportunities for self correction along the road am somewhat troubled by \u201ctrial by internet\u201d, but nothing publicly posted has been untrue. The truth will set you free hope Yuval can come out the other side of this, but he is nowhere close as far as can tell. Reply Anon 2020 think both points you bring up are stupid. First, obviously Yuval\u2019s merits as a mathematician are relevant. The better he is, the more impactful and detrimental his time out would be. Taking things to the (insane) extreme, suppose his mathematical output was 10 times that of all other mathematicians combined (not just quantity of output, quality as well); then it would make no sense to give him any time out. Second, Lior did ruin Yuval\u2019s reputation and career. True, it is Yuval\u2019s fault Yuval did those things, but you cannot deny that Lior caused his firing/resignation and took the situation to a whole new level. Reply > \u201cYuval clearly needs to take his current time-out and reflect on how to be a better person.\u201d That was exactly the language and logic used unironically (as is done here, too) in the Cultural Revolution when sending people to the gulags, re- education centers etc. Of course the whole series of attacks on Peres also reeks of a struggle session in which the students get to settle scores with their teachers. 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 12/15 January 12, 2020 at 4:41 am eventhisoneistaken January 16, 2020 at 3:25 am Caveman In academia today, Cult Rev herd behavior has become pervasive, all- powerful (forget about any protections associated with tenure), and easily focused against particular targets. This is a larger and more important story than the evolution of sexual harrassment standards. Reply @Anon 2020: ok, I\u2019ll bite. Without defending Yuval\u2019s (alleged) behavior, I\u2019m trying to get a sense of proportion. If not a lifetime ban, then how long? Suppose you\u2019re a math department chair at a decent university \u2014 that that would be thrilled, under normal circumstances, to hire someone of Yuval\u2019s caliber. How long before you\u2019d be willing to consider hiring him? 2 years? 5? 10? 25? Reply The imperious outrage against Peres is unbelievably hypocritical coming from the specific people who have set this campaign in motion. Of the people writing the letters and blog campaigns on this matter, several (at least 3 by my count, including Pachter) are actually married to people in their own field. All of these marriages are between more senior/famous men and less senior, less well-known women in the field. Which is of course a very common mode of mating for women in math, CS, physics, philosophy and other male dominated subjects of women in such fields date or marry within the field, for more or less obvious sociological reasons. Given the sex ratio and females\u2019 higher interest (compared to males) in older partners, the women usually can and do choose to do this dating with men in the field who are more senior and accomplished than themselves woman at the 60th percentile can command a man at the 95th percentile, or something like that. Given all this, a guy in Peres\u2019 position, that is, a senior but not senior-citizen superstar, is entirely correct to take the Bayesian prior probability of \u201cthis 40th percentile female grad student might be interested in my advances\u201d to be orders of magnitude higher than the same figure for a random woman from the general population: the intra-departmental sexual calculus is different, because it is. And since the couplings and marriages are visibly and regularly happening in any large department, and range from tolerated to celebrated, he would see evidence throughout his career that dating women from the office is not, per se, deviant behavior. The other feature that changes things is that the aforementioned male- dominated fields have an obviously high percentage of autistic, Asperger or 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 13/15 January 16, 2020 at 9:41 am stem tree dweller January 16, 2020 at 11:51 am Caveman undersocialized individuals, disproportionately male. This does not mean that prevailing social norms should automatically be relaxed, but it does mean that there will, just as a matter of statistics, inevitably be a lot of men who will respond dysfunctionally to the peculiarities of the intra-academic dating environment. Draconian mass punishment after the fact is not a reasonable mechanism for enforcing the norms, especially norms that are changing over time. Preventive and educational approaches are more appropriate when a lot of the people are not realistically likely to \u201cget it\u201d just because it is written somewhere in a code of conduct. Pachter & Co are well aware of all this. It is incredibly hypocritical to have literally built their own lives around the assortative mating possibilities that are enthusiastically pursued in every academic environment, and at the same time treat it as outrageous that Peres and others like him might calibrate their own behavior to account for the reality of this dating market (which is a huge but publicly unacknowledged driver of behavior within the field). Reply You are completely overlooking the fact that he made advances on someone whom he was in a position to hire, and also on his PhD student. Everything you said does not apply to that. Reply have not overlooked it. Plenty of the academic meat market, possibly including marriages or other relationships of the individuals leading the public attack on Peres, involves people in-a- position-to hire, grade, recommend, etc. Something that you and most other commenters are overlooking in this regard is that the professional conflict of interest by crusaders such as Pachter or Anima Anandkumar. People who develop a reputation for relentlessly attacking and shaming others in the name of moral purity acquire a career superweapon for themselves: anyone who could potentially find themselves the target of such a campaign, or just does not want to have experiences of the sort that Steve Pinker and Scott Aaronson have had with Anima, learns to defer to such crusaders in all sorts of professional settings, giving them more power and career advantages over others who don\u2019t engage in the purity- contest-with-live-ammunition. How many times, for example, did Pachter get his way because (unknown to him) somebody had some dirty laundry and did not want to get on Lior\u2019s bad side? Imagine the leverage he gains over in situations where it *isn\u2019t* unknown to him, and Lior knows that knows that Lior knows that knows\u2026 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 14/15 January 16, 2020 at 3:39 pm Lior Pachter January 16, 2020 at 5:23 pm Caveman Turning sexual harrassment (or racism, discrimination, and other not-quite- illegal crimes proved by ex parte reports) into nuclear weapons against the perpetrators also means that arms control is needed to prevent actual or potential abuses by the white knights crime is an unlawful act so a crime cannot be \u201cnot-quite-illegal\u201d. They are mostly social crimes, not legal crimes (at the moment) and certainly not felonies. Which is what allows them to be prosecuted in ways that are more irregular and more punitive than anything that would go through a court. The 3 Israelis\u2019 letter on the Stanford email list stated that nothing they heard in the reports of Peres\u2019 behavior was illegal, which is consistent with all that has come out since then. At most one case, the one with the PhD student featured on this blog post, sounds like something that could prevail in a civil court (had it somehow been captured on video, and if all the rest of the facts that might develop would favor only the accuser). In the meantime, the man\u2019s career is being dismantled with no end in sight. By the way, with regard to the Terry Speed case, your wife was his PhD student. Obviously this creates many possibilities for your private and public campaign against him, years after the fact, being a personally motivated vendetta rather than merely a principled enforcement of universal standards against harassment. It\u2019s very convenient that Speed has to defend himself or resign, but the white knights such as yourself do not need to explain the background to bringing the case. 2/22/25, 8:35 An outrage at Davis | Bits of 15/15", "8484_103.pdf": "Yuval Peres \u05d9\u05d5\u05d1\u05dc \u05e4\u05e8\u05e1 Peres in 2005 Born 5 October 1963 Jerusalem, Israel Nationality Israeli Alma mater Hebrew University of Jerusalem Awards Lo\u00e8ve Prize (2001) Davidson Prize (1995) Scientific career Fields Mathematics Institutions Hebrew University of Jerusalem University of California at Berkeley Microsoft Research Doctoral advisor Hillel Furstenberg Yuval Peres Yuval Peres (Hebrew: \u05e4\u05e8\u05e1 \u05d9\u05d5\u05d1\u05dc; born 5 October 1963) is an Israeli mathematician best known for his research in probability theory, ergodic theory, mathematical analysis, theoretical computer science, and in particular for topics such as fractals and Hausdorff measure, random walks, Brownian motion, percolation and Markov chain mixing times.[1] Peres has been accused of sexual harassment by several female scientists.[2] Peres was born in Israel and obtained his Ph.D. at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1990 under the supervision of Hillel Furstenberg.[3] After his Ph.D. Peres had postdoctoral positions at Stanford and Yale. In 1993 Peres joined the statistics department at Berkeley. He later became a professor in both the mathematics and statistics departments.[3] He was also a professor at the Hebrew University.[4] In 2006 Peres joined the Theory Group of Microsoft Research.[5] By 2011 he was principal researcher at Microsoft Research and manager of the Microsoft Research Theory Group, an affiliate professor of mathematics at the University of Washington and an adjunct professor at the University of California, Berkeley.[6] Peres was awarded the Rollo Davidson Prize in 1995 and the Lo\u00e8ve Prize in 2001.[3] The work that led to the Lo\u00e8ve Prize was surveyed in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society key breakthrough was the observation that certain (hard to prove) intersection properties for Brownian motion and random walks are in fact equivalent to (easier to prove) survival properties of branching processes. Education and career Recognition 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres - Wikipedia 1/5 This led ultimately to deep work on sample path properties of Brownian motion; for instance, on the fractal dimension of the frontier of two-dimensional Brownian motion and precise study of its thick and thin points and cover times.\"[3] Peres was an invited speaker at the International Congress of Mathematicians in 2002. In 2011, he was a co-recipient of the David P. Robbins Prize for work on the maximum overhang problem. That year he also delivered the Paul Tur\u00e1n Memorial Lecture.[7] In 2012 he became a fellow of the American Mathematical Society.[8] In 2016, he was elected a foreign associate of the National Academy of Sciences.[9] In July 2017, he was a plenary lecturer at the Mathematical Congress of the Americas.[10] Peres has been accused of sexual harassment by several female scientists, including Dana Moshkovitz, Anima Anandkumar and Lisha Li. Moshkovitz said she was harassed by Peres on an informal job interview and she reported this to the Microsoft Theory Group. She also said that Peres was promoted shortly after her report.[2] Peres resigned from an affiliate position at the University of Washington in 2012. The university said he resigned \u201cafter receiving notice that the university would be investigating allegations of sexual harassment.\u201d [2] In November 2018 three Israeli computer scientists Irit Dinur, Oded Goldreich and Ehud Friedgut wrote a letter to the community mentioning some allegations of sexual harassment against Peres and proposed a guideline of not making invitations to junior researchers that may be viewed as intimate.[2] In response Peres wrote a letter to the community and said regret all cases in the past where have not followed this principle had no intention to harass anyone but must have been tone deaf not to recognize that was making some people very uncomfortable. As wrote above promise to adhere to this principle in the future.\"[11] Levin, David A.; Peres, Yuval; Wilmer, Elizabeth L. (2009). Markov Chains and Mixing Times. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society 978-0-8218-4739-8. 2nd ed., 2017.[12] Hough, J. Ben; Krishnapur, Manjunath; Peres, Yuval; Vir\u00e1g, B\u00e1lint (2009). Zeros of Gaussian Analytic Functions and Determinantal Processes. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.[13] M\u00f6rters, Peter; Peres, Yuval (2010). Brownian Motion. Cambridge University Press.[14] Lyons, Russell; Peres, Yuval (2016). Probability on Trees and Networks ( dlyons/prbtree/prbtree.html). Cambridge University Press.[15] Bishop, Christopher J.; Peres, Yuval (2017). Fractals in Probability and Analysis. Cambridge University Press.[16] Karlin, Anna; Peres, Yuval (2017). Game Theory, Alive. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.[17] Allegations of sexual harassment Books 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres - Wikipedia 2/5 Official Website ( Yuval Peres ( at the Mathematics Genealogy Project David P. Robbins Prize for the paper Maximum Overhang ( rch/blog/maximum-overhang-optimum-reward/?from=http%3A%2F%2Fresearch.microsoft.com%2 Fen-us%2Fnews%2Ffeatures%2Fperesrobbins-030311.aspx), by Mike Paterson, Yuval Peres, Mikkel Thorup, Peter Winkler, and Uri Zwick. Plenary talk by Yuval Peres at the 2011 Joint Mathematics Meetings in New Orleans ( eb.archive.org/web/20121104001015/ es New Model For Proof-Checking ( r-new-model-for-proof.html), by Brown University computer scientist Claire Mathieu, describes Yuval Peres's influence on rigorous proofs in computer science. 1. Ravindran, Sandeep (25 September 2018). \"Profile of Yuval Peres\" ( 73/pnas.1813856115). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (39): 9646\u20139648. doi:10.1073/pnas.1813856115 ( 0027-8424 (h ttps://search.worldcat.org/issn/0027-8424 6166848 ( es/PMC6166848). 2. \"Yuval Peres, math professor with series of sexual misconduct allegations levied against him, gives lecture at Davis\" ( s-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations-levied-against-him-gives-lecture-at-uc-davis/). 5 December 2019. 3. David Aldous (October 2001). \"Peres Receives 2001 Lo\u00e8ve Prize\" ( 0109/people.pdf) (PDF). Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 49 (9): 999\u20131000. 4 citation\" ( Retrieved 17 November 2019. 5 talk page\" ( ems/#!speakers). Microsoft. Retrieved 17 November 2019. 6. \"2011 page\" ( us/um/people/peres/). Archived from the original ( eres/) on 18 October 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2013. 7. \"Tur\u00e1n Memorial Lectures\" ( 8. \"List of Fellows of the American Mathematical Society\" ( t). Retrieved 23 February 2013. 9. \"National Academy of Sciences Presentation ceremony\" ( ory/members/20022807.html). 29 April 2017. 10. \"Mathematical Congress of the Americas 2017\" ( 11. \"Stanford Theory Seminar mailing list archive\" ( nar/2018-November.txt). 28 November 2018. External links References 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres - Wikipedia 3/5 12. Reviews of Markov Chains and Mixing Times: H\u00e4ggstr\u00f6m, Olle (2010). Mathematical Reviews 2466937 ( hscinet-getitem?mr=2466937). Aldous, David (March 2019). The Mathematical Intelligencer. 41 (1): 90\u201391. doi:10.1007/s00283-018-9839-x ( 3918079 ( S2CID 125379648 ( Konstantopoulos, Takis (2019 Review. 61 (3): 631\u2013634. doi:10.1137/19N974865 (http s://doi.org/10.1137%2F19N974865 3989422 ( em?mr=3989422). S2CID 201743233 ( Durrett, Richard (September 2019). \"Review\" ( -chains-and-mixing-times-0 Reviews. 13. Review of Zeros of Gaussian Analytic Functions and Determinantal Point Processes: Beliaev, Dmitry (2011). Mathematical Reviews 2552864 ( scinet-getitem?mr=2552864). 14. Reviews of Brownian Motion: Rabinovitch, Peter (May 2010). \"Review\" ( motion-0 Reviews. Schilling, Ren\u00e9 L. (2011). Mathematical Reviews. Burdzy, Krzysztof (2011 Review. 53 (2): 384\u2013385. doi:10.1137/SIREAD000053000002000375000001 ( 3000002000375000001 2830324 ( 30324). Gut, Allan (September 2011). Journal of the American Statistical Association. 106 (495): 1220\u2013 1221. doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.br1109 ( 23427587 ( 2894777 ( ms.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2894777). S2CID 219594877 ( CorpusID:219594877). 15. Reviews of Probability on Trees and Networks: Durrett, Richard (May 2017). \"Review\" ( -trees-and-networks Reviews. Miclo, Laurent. Mathematical Reviews 3616205 ( etitem?mr=3616205). 16. Reviews of Fractals in Probability and Analysis: Das, Tushar (November 2017). \"Review\" ( robability-and-analysis Reviews. Croydon, David A. Mathematical Reviews 3616046 ( t-getitem?mr=3616046). 17. Reviews of Game Theory, Alive: Hunacek, Mark (June 2017). \"Review\" ( alive Reviews. Aazami, Amir Babak (December 2018 News. 49 (4): 11\u201312. doi:10.1145/3300150.3300154 ( S2CID 56176729 ( 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres - Wikipedia 4/5 Retrieved from \" 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres - Wikipedia 5/5", "8484_104.pdf": "Bits of Reviews and commentary on computational biology by Lior Pachter Yuval Peres November 28, 2018 in sexual harassment | Tags: sexual harassment, Yuval Peres | by Lior Pachter The post concerns Yuval Peres, a principal researcher in the Microsoft Theory Group [update Dec. 26, 2018 is no longer employed at Microsoft] and a former colleague of mine at Berkeley. Below is a copy of an email sent yesterday to numerous theory of computer science professors worldwide, and published on the Stanford Theory Seminar List. It corroborates information heard about Yuval Peres a number of years ago when was a mathematics professor at Berkeley. At the time was asked to keep the information heard confidential, and did so because the person who discussed it with me was, understandably, afraid of retaliation. Now wonder to what extent my silence allowed his harassment of women to continue unabated also wonder when the leaders of the statistics department at Berkeley, where Peres used to work, and where Terry Speed was a professor emeritus before reported him, will end their culture of silence. Hello all, This is an email composed by Irit Dinur, Oded Goldreich and me. The purpose of this email is to share with you concerns that we had regarding the unethical behavior of Yuval Peres. The behavior we are referring to includes several recent incidents from the past few years, on top of the two \u201cbig\u201d cases of sexual harassment that led to severe sanctions against him by his employer, Microsoft, and to the termination of his connections with the University of Washington. Together with two colleagues who are highly regarded and trusted by us, we have first and second-hand testimonies (by people we trust without a shed of doubt) of at least five additional cases of him approaching junior female scientists, some of them students, with offers of intimate nature, behavior that has caused its victims quite a bit of distress since these offers were \u201cinsistent\u201d. While the examples that we encountered from the last few years do not fall under the category of sexual harassment from a legal point of view, they certainly caused great discomfort to the victims, who were young female scientists, putting them in a highly awkward situation, and creating an atmosphere that they\u2019d rather avoid (i.e., they would rather miss a conference or a lecture than risk being subjected to repeated intimate offers by him). We wish to stress that his aggressive advances toward young women, usually with no previous friendly connections with him, puts them 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 1/82 in a vulnerable position of fearing to cross a senior scientist who might have an impact on their career, which is at a fragile stage. We believe that the questions of whether or not Yuval Peres intended to make them uncomfortable, and whether or not he would or could actually harm their scientific status are irrelevant; the fact is that the victims felt very stressed to a point that they\u2019d rather miss professional events than risk encountering the same situation again. Needless to say, it is the responsibility of senior members of our community to avoid putting less senior members in such a position. Our current involvement with this issue was triggered by an invitation Yuval Peres received to give a plenary talk at an international conference next year. We felt that this invitation sends a highly undesirable message to our community in general, and to the women he harassed in particular, as if his transgressions are considered unimportant. We sent an email conveying our concern to the organizers of the conference, suggesting that they disinvite him. With our permission, they forwarded a version of our letter (in which we made changes in order to protect the identity of the women involved) to Yuval Peres. They did not reveal our identity, rather they told him that this is a letter from \u201csenior members of the community\u201d. In our letter we included a paragraph describing a general principle that should be followed. The principle is senior researcher should not approach a junior researcher with an invitation that may be viewed as intimate or personal unless such an invitation was issued in the past by this specific junior to that specific senior. The point being that even if the senior researcher has no intimate/personal intentions, such intentions may be read by the junior researcher, placing the junior in an awkward situation and possibly causing them great distress. Examples for such an invitation include any invitation to a personal event in which only the senior and the junior will be present (e.g., a two-person dinner, a meeting in a private home, etc). Yuval\u2019s reply was rather laconic, in particular, he did not address the issue of his behavior in the past couple of years. However, he did write certainly embrace the principle described in boldface in the letter. This seems to be the right approach for any senior scientist these days.\u201d The reason we are copying this to all of you (as opposed, for example, to using bcc) is related to the islanders\u2019 paradox: we believe that the fact that everyone knows that 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 2/82 218 comments Comments feed for this article November 28, 2018 at 6:21 am Ehud Friedgut Dear Lior am unhappy with your decision to post this, and feel you should have requested our permission first urge you to remove the post immediately, as it is only a matter of hours before his family will be alerted to this, and have no desire to harm his kids, parents, siblings and, of course, wife. In any case, until you do so am also sending below his response to our letter. Reply everyone knows is a significant boost to holding Yuval Peres accountable for his future actions. We\u2019re also bcc\u2019ing several young women who already aware of Yuval Peres\u2019s actions, in order to keep them in the know too. We understand that sending this out to a large number of people without offering Yuval Peres the chance to respond may be considered unfair. However, after weighing the pros and cons carefully we believe this is a good course of action. First of all, because it is clear that the victims did not invent his offers and their ensuing feelings of anxiety and stress. Secondly, we know that Yuval Peres has been confronted in a face to face conversation by a senior colleague, and it did not end his behavior, so we think it\u2019s important to stay vigilant in protecting the younger members of our community. Thirdly, the information in this letter will reach (or has already reached) almost all of you in any case, so the main effect of the letter is making what everyone knows into public knowledge. Finally, although his response to the organizers did include the minimum of declaring he accepts the guiding principle that we stated, it did not include any reference to the ongoing behavior we described- neither regret nor concern nor denial. So it\u2019s not easy to assume that he truly intends to mend his ways. We hope that our actions will contribute to the future of our community as an environment that offers all a pleasant and non-threatening atmosphere. Sincerely, Irit Dinur, Ehud Friedgut, Oded Goldreich 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 3/82 November 28, 2018 at 8:43 am Lior Pachter November 29, 2018 at 12:09 am Audrey Fu November 28, 2018 at 6:24 am Ehud Friedgut Hi Ehud did not choose to make this letter public. It was made public by others, e.g. Omer Reingold, who posted it to the stanford-theory list which linked to I\u2019m my post ( When saw it there realized could not in good faith blog about it, given the information had heard independently appreciate very much Omer\u2019s statement on the matter and his forwarding of the email to the Stanford theory list, as well, of course, your and your coauthors\u2019 courage in sending it around. Reply Dear Ehud (and Lior am just a reader of this blog post and not involved in matters mentioned in the letter. Nonetheless wanted to thank you and the other two co-writers of this email for taking sexual harassment seriously and for speaking up also wanted to thank Lior for sharing this email. Most victims of sexual harassments keep quiet because of the humiliation from the harassment itself and because of the denial and hostility in the society when the harassment is revealed to the public, as displayed in several despicable comments here. It is therefore particularly noble and respectable for you and others to lend your voice to the junior researchers and to sexual harassment victims in general. The general reaction in other sexual harassment cases has shown that even though most victims do not speak up and most people do not bother to leave comments, actions similar to yours are immensely respected and silently applauded by the majority in the society. Academia (and elsewhere) needs more people like you. Reply \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014 Dear Ehud, Irit and Oded, Dear email recipients: This is my community, and greatly appreciate each and every one of you. As you can imagine am sad to see this email but understand it arises from genuine concern of the authors do wish they had written to me directly rather than through intermediaries disagree with some claims in the email but let me start by emphasizing that embrace the passage: 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 4/82 senior researcher should not approach a junior researcher with an invitation that may be viewed as intimate or personal unless such an invitation was issued in the past by this specific junior to that specific senior. The point being that even if the senior researcher has no intimate/personal intentions, such intentions may be read by the junior researcher, placing the junior in an awkward situation and possibly causing them great distress. Examples for such an invitation include any invitation to a personal event in which only the senior and the junior will be present (e.g., a two-person dinner, a meeting in a private home, etc regret all cases in the past where have not followed this principle had no intention to harass anyone but must have been tone deaf not to recognize that was making some people very uncomfortable. As wrote above promise to adhere to this principle in the future. In order to show that am not trivializing the concerns of Ehud, Irit and Oded will regretfully rescind my acceptance to deliver a keynote talk in the conference that sparked their message apologize to the organizers of that conference and wrote to them separately have collaborated with about 300 researchers in my career, many of them women, and most of my success is due to those collaborations lot of those collaborations took place in two-person lunches and dinners but usually when the collaborators knew each other well). In particular consider my early work with Claire Mathieu and my recent book with Anna Karlin as some of the high points of my career. In the last gave four talks, three of them based on collaborations with brilliant young women completely agree that it is crucial that we present a welcoming atmosphere to these women. If any one of you has further suggestions, you are very welcome to write to me personally at this address. Yours, Yuval \u2014\u2014\u2014- \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014- From: Ehud Friedgut Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2018, 10:07 Subject: Sexual harassment To: ofer zeitouni , Itai Benjamini , Ronen Eldan , David Peleg , Michal Irani , Robert Krauthgamer , Jennifer Chayes , Christian Borgs , Anna Karlin , Ronitt Rubinfeld , Noga Alon , Benjamin Sudakov , Michael Krivelevich , Asaf Shapira , Michal Karonski , Andrzej Rucinski , Wojtek Samotij , Ron Peled , James R. Lee , Nati Linial , Avi Wigderson , Gil Kalai , Penny Haxell , Tamar Ziegler , Dorit Aharonov , , , , , , , , , Cc: Irit Dinur , Oded Goldreich 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 5/82 Hello all, This is an email composed by Irit Dinur, Oded Goldreich and me. The purpose of this email is to share with you concerns that we had regarding the unethical behavior of Yuval Peres. The behavior we are referring to includes several recent incidents from the past few years, on top of the two \u201cbig\u201d cases of sexual harassment that led to severe sanctions against him by his employer, Microsoft, and to the termination of his connections with the University of Washington. Together with two colleagues who are highly regarded and trusted by us, we have first and second-hand testimonies (by people we trust without a shed of doubt) of at least five additional cases of him approaching junior female scientists, some of them students, with offers of intimate nature, behavior that has caused its victims quite a bit of distress since these offers were \u201cinsistent\u201d. While the examples that we encountered from the last few years do not fall under the category of sexual harassment from a legal point of view, they certainly caused great discomfort to the victims, who were young female scientists, putting them in a highly awkward situation, and creating an atmosphere that they\u2019d rather avoid (i.e., they would rather miss a conference or a lecture than risk being subjected to repeated intimate offers by him). We wish to stress that his aggressive advances toward young women, usually with no previous friendly connections with him, puts them in a vulnerable position of fearing to cross a senior scientist who might have an impact on their career, which is at a fragile stage. We believe that the questions of whether or not Yuval Peres intended to make them uncomfortable, and whether or not he would or could actually harm their scientific status are irrelevant; the fact is that the victims felt very stressed to a point that they\u2019d rather miss professional events than risk encountering the same situation again. Needless to say, it is the responsibility of senior members of our community to avoid putting less senior members in such a position. Our current involvement with this issue was triggered by an invitation Yuval Peres received to give a plenary talk at an international conference next year. We felt that this invitation sends a highly undesirable message to our community in general, and to the women he harassed in particular, as if his transgressions are considered unimportant. We sent an email conveying our concern to the organizers of the conference, suggesting that they disinvite him. With our permission, they forwarded a version of our letter (in which we made changes in order to protect the identity of the women involved) to Yuval Peres. They did not reveal our identity, rather they told him that this is a letter from \u201csenior members of the 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 6/82 community\u201d. In our letter we included a paragraph describing a general principle that should be followed. The principle is senior researcher should not approach a junior researcher with an invitation that may be viewed as intimate or personal unless such an invitation was issued in the past by this specific junior to that specific senior. The point being that even if the senior researcher has no intimate/personal intentions, such intentions may be read by the junior researcher, placing the junior in an awkward situation and possibly causing them great distress. Examples for such an invitation include any invitation to a personal event in which only the senior and the junior will be present (e.g., a two-person dinner, a meeting in a private home, etc). Yuval\u2019s reply was rather laconic, in particular, he did not address the issue of his behavior in the past couple of years. However, he did write certainly embrace the principle described in boldface in the letter. This seems to be the right approach for any senior scientist these days.\u201d The reason we are copying this to all of you (as opposed, for example, to using bcc) is related to the islanders\u2019 paradox: we believe that the fact that everyone knows that everyone knows is a significant boost to holding Yuval Peres accountable for his future actions. We\u2019re also bcc\u2019ing several young women who already aware of Yuval Peres\u2019s actions, in order to keep them in the know too. We understand that sending this out to a large number of people without offering Yuval Peres the chance to respond may be considered unfair. However, after weighing the pros and cons carefully we believe this is a good course of action. First of all, because it is clear that the victims did not invent his offers and their ensuing feelings of anxiety and stress. Secondly, we know that Yuval Peres has been confronted in a face to face conversation by a senior colleague, and it did not end his behavior, so we think it\u2019s important to stay vigilant in protecting the younger members of our community. Thirdly, the information in this letter will reach (or has already reached) almost all of you in any case, so the main effect of the letter is making what everyone knows into public knowledge. Finally, although his response to the organizers did include the minimum of declaring he accepts the guiding principle that we stated, it did not include any reference to the ongoing behavior we described \u2013 neither regret nor concern nor denial. So it\u2019s not easy to assume that he truly intends to mend his ways. We hope that our actions will contribute to the future of our community as an environment that offers all a pleasant and non-threatening atmosphere. Sincerely, 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 7/82 November 29, 2018 at 9:00 pm Kaizer November 28, 2018 at 6:28 am Rick Durrett November 28, 2018 at 6:52 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) November 28, 2018 at 7:15 am eventhisoneistaken November 28, 2018 at 7:20 am Anon November 28, 2018 at 8:37 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) November 28, 2018 at 8:59 am Lior Pachter November 28, 2018 at 9:52 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) Irit Dinur, Ehud Friedgut, Oded Goldreich Reply Always wondered why got along so well with my female batchmates but had the smirk of the worlds most burdened man when we wanted to run some thoughts by him. Weird world this! Reply can\u2019t believe you posted this slanderous piece. Reply You can\u2019t? It is a disgusting hit piece, but completely in character for Pachter. Reply Lior Pachter is just the sort of creep to get #metooed. Just wait. It is not signed by Pachter recall you accused certain people pointing out thje obvious of \u201cbesmirching\u201d your character for what you deemed merely impartial faciliation of certain discussion can\u2019t tell how all thjat squares in your mind, but then I\u2019m not a specialist. @Anon By a happy coincidence, @Ehud Friedgut\u2019s comments have clarified Pachter\u2019s role. The letter he cites was (at least semi-private, since the recipient list is not short hope you are clear on what mean now. You apparently did not even read the post, because if you did you would see that it is not who wrote the email nor is it who made it public saw it on the Stanford Theory List ( So no, the letter posted was not private, nor was it semi-private am not at all clear on what you mean. @Lior Pachter did not catch the Stanford Theory list reference, it is true, 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 8/82 November 28, 2018 at 6:10 pm Anima November 28, 2018 at 10:59 am Nicolas Bray November 28, 2018 at 11:26 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) November 28, 2018 at 8:29 pm Nicolas Bray but this only makes the guilt shared between yourself and the authors. The letter (and your post) accuse Yuval of some unspecified inappropriate behavior in public, leaving people to imagine the worst, and thus blackening a man\u2019s name with no grounds whatever/. The initial authors are cowards also \u2013 if they thought it was inappropriate for Peres to speak at whatever conference it was, fair enough, they could have written him directly, and asked him to withdraw. All three authors of the letter are very senior people, and it is not like some grad students living in fear of the great and mighty Peres. This is disgusting cowardice and lack of honor on the part of all four \u201caccusers\u201d. See my comment below was subjected to sexual harassment, it was unmistakable and it was gross. Yes, u should imagine the worst with Yuval because that is what women researchers have experienced Hi Rick, For something to be slander, it has to be false. HTH, Nick Reply The letter alleges that the acted improperly, in an unspecified (but clearly not criminal, and not even harassing [according to the letter itself] way). It also alleges that disciplinary action was taken by and MSFT. Presumably, such action (if, indeed, it existed) was taken confidentially, so the only way the authors of the letter became aware of it was gossip. So, to summarize: this post is not slander, it is not libel, but it malicious gossip, so while the people involved cannot be sued (at least as far as know) the readers can (and in several cases am aware of, have) lose all respect for them. By contrast, Peres, whatever inappropriate things he may or may not have done, is now the victim. Hi Igor think it\u2019s really neat how you manage to have an epistemology so radically strict that basically anything that doesn\u2019t happen directly in front of your eyes is in some realm of unknowability while also managing to believe that, e.g., Barack Obama was born in Kenya. If 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 9/82 November 28, 2018 at 9:15 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) didn\u2019t know any better, I\u2019d say that you just believed whatever you felt like and constructed post hoc rationalizations to justify yourself! Meanwhile, even ignoring the novel things alleged in this email, we see: 1) Dinur, Goldreich, and Friedgut, who have no apparent motive to lie and would clearly be harmed professionally if they did so, state forthrightly that there were \u201ctwo \u2018big\u2019 cases of sexual harassment\u201d against Peres which were found to have merit by Microsoft and the University of Washington 2) They not only state this but do so in a manner which suggests this is common knowledge for their intended audience (i.e., top researchers in the field of theory) 3) Peres himself For anyone with even the slightest grasp on reality, rather than the sad jumble that resides within your skull, it\u2019s incredibly obvious that Peres has sexually harassed multiple women. HTH, Nick Thank you for your thoughtful response. You will notice, however, that Lior\u2019s audience is the audience you refer to, but the big wide world out there (including, as Friedgut points out, Yuval\u2019s family, which is not part of the research community). The question is: what is the purpose of their letter? If it is to not have Yuval speak at some conference, the proper way to do this is for them to contact him directly. If it is to apprise the world of his alleged malfeasance, they should do so, and not beat around the bush (actually, an even better way is to contact him, and have him clear the air, probably with the aid of his attorneys, and his employer (and attorneys) especially as he seems happy to publicly recant). They way they did it does result in reputational damage (to themselves), but it did not have to. Also, certainly facts being \u201cwell-known\u201d in a community does not actually mean that they are not gossip have certainly been around long enough to see plenty of outright falsehood attain the status of well-known facts. Now, we ask: what is the purpose of Lior Pachter\u2019s shouting from the rooftops? The only purpose see is \u201cvirtue signaling\u201d, since he has no direct connection (that am aware of) with Peres, and his only connection to the whole affair is his subscription to the Stanford Theory list find him appointing himself the guardian of public morals nothing short of repulsive. Speaking of repulsive, please cut out your insults. It makes you look like an idiot, which assume, is not your goal. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 10/82 November 28, 2018 at 9:35 pm Lior Pachter November 28, 2018 at 10:30 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) Dear Igor, So that readers may be aware of a significant conflict of interest in our exchanges must include here a link to my previous blog post that centered on your hijacking of a mathematics journal to further your misogynist goals: Regarding this post, you asked who wrote it for decided to repost the letter from the Stanford theory list because thought women and men in *all* of the areas Yuval works in should be aware of his behavior. Readers of my blog include people from mathematics (specifically combinatorics), computer science and probability/statistics, all fields which are relevant here. Finally, it appears that you have lost all respect for me and that you find me and my blog repulsive (your words). You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and if this is how you feel perhaps you should stop reading my blog and commenting on it? You are of course welcome to continue spewing your vitriol here don\u2019t censor- but also imagine that many readers, like me, understand at this point what you think and don\u2019t need to have it repeated ad nauseam. Lior Dear Lior, Thanks for the comments. First of all disagree with your characterization of my activity as misogynistic. Second do appreciate the fact that you do not censor. Third do have respect for you intellectually, but that has the curious effect of making me more unhappy about your vicious attacks on people (after all, who cares about what some idiot says? But you are not an idiot). Fourth have been (and still am) hoping to understand what it is that drives you. My theory, as you know, is that it is virtue signaling, but am sure you don\u2019t agree, so there is some cognitive dissonance. Fifth, as you by now know am severely triggered by witchhunts (since these had completely corrupted the intellectual atmosphere in Eastern Europe during my childhood, and resulted in the untimely demise of tens of millions of people do not expect that you will cause the latter, but you, and the likes of BethAnn McLaughlin, are doing your part to accomplish the former hope you understand that). In the particular case of Yuval had written a paper with him (he did much more of the work than did), so if you like, you can consider it a conflict of interest. That said am perfectly with him facing the consequences of his actions, with the proviso that due process is followed. What you are doing is not due process (but a witchhunt, see above). If, for example, Yuval loses his 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 11/82 November 29, 2018 at 12:09 am Nicolas Bray job at because they fear bad PR, and not actually because of whatever it was he did, well, then, a grave injustice will have been done do hope we understand each other. Igor Rivin: \u201cThank you for your thoughtful response cannot accept your thanks because it was not, in fact, a thoughtful response. It was merely an enumeration of things obvious to anyone who read that letter with the intent of actually understanding the situation rather than constructing rationalizations to defend sexual harassers. \u201cYou will notice, however, that Lior\u2019s audience is the audience you refer to but the big wide world out there\u201d That is completely irrelevant to the context in which invoked the intended audience of the letter. \u201c(including, as Friedgut points out, Yuval\u2019s family, which is not part of the research community).\u201d That is indeed unfortunate and any suffering they feel is yet another thing that Peres should feel deeply guilty for (although will not hold my breath). \u201cThe question is: what is the purpose of their letter?\u201d No, this is not \u201cthe question\u201d. The authors of the letter had their purpose in writing it but that purpose is not of great interest to me. *My* purpose is that every single sexual harasser is made to answer for what they\u2019ve done and that would-be harassers cower in fear of the consequences they might face. \u201cThey way they did it does result in reputational damage (to themselves), but it did not have to know this is difficult for you to understand but most people do not share your perverse sense of what makes for a good reputation. Most people actually admire those who take action to stop harm from occurring. \u201cNow, we ask: what is the purpose of Lior Pachter\u2019s shouting from the rooftops? The only purpose see is \u201cvirtue signaling\u201d, since he has no direct connection (that am aware of) with Peres\u201d Again, what is a mystery to you is plain to see for those you do not have your shortcomings. Lior\u2019s purpose is to stop Peres from harassing more women and the motivation you find so perplexing is a genuine hatred of sexual harassment. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 12/82 November 29, 2018 at 8:15 pm Lior Pachter November 28, 2018 at 6:50 am Ehud Friedgut November 28, 2018 at 8:42 am Lior Pachter Your citation of Lior\u2019s lack of direct connection is revealing. Most people understand that it is possible for someone to care about things that do not directly affect them. \u201cSpeaking of repulsive, please cut out your insults. It makes you look like an idiot, which assume, is not your goal.\u201d Igor, insulting you is very much the appropriate thing to do. Your grimy attempts to take the high road here do not change the fact that you are a truly terrible person. It was brought to my attention that my claim that don\u2019t censor could be viewed as incompatible with my blog comments policy which is that reserve the right to reject comments if they contain inappropriate content\u201d (see would like to clarify that the comment policy articulated on the About page is the one follow on this blog. The number of comments have not approved, except for one post which closed for comments is about 1 a year. Dear Lior am unhappy with your decision to post this think you should have requested our permission first urge to remove the post immediately, as it is only a matter of hours before this reaches his kids, parents, wife, etc., and see no reason to inflict this on them. Also, until you remove it am posting his answer to our letter below. Please remove this post! Ehud Reply Hi Ehud did not choose to make this letter public. It was made public by others, e.g. Omer Reingold, who posted it to the stanford-theory list which linked to I\u2019m my post ( When saw it there realized could not in good faith blog about it, given the information had heard independently appreciate very much Omer\u2019s statement on the matter and his forwarding of the email to the Stanford theory list, as well, of course, your and your coauthors\u2019 courage in sending it around. Lior Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 13/82 November 28, 2018 at 7:01 am fedster9 November 28, 2018 at 6:11 pm Anima November 29, 2018 at 4:05 am fedster9 November 28, 2018 at 7:14 am wouldeveryonepleasegrowup do not understand how \u2018persistent\u2019 \u2018intimate\u2019 offers \u2018do not fall under the category of sexual harassment from a legal point of view\u2019. Depending on the jurisdiction people in a \u2018position of trust\u2019, might, or might not, go to a junior colleague or a student and say \u2018how about we have sex?\u2019, but once they are told, \u2018Thanks for the beautiful offer, but no thanks\u2019, any further attempt qualifies as harassment, right? and the same would be for a request for a date, right? If that is not the matter at hand, what are we talking about here also do not understand this senior researcher should not approach a junior researcher with an invitation that may be viewed as intimate or personal unless such an invitation was issued in the past by this specific junior to that specific senior\u2019. Does it mean is it ok for students to hit on their supervisors? How is this acceptable? What the hell is going on? Reply am not bothered by dinner invitations personally. Yuval is a sexual predator. there is no ambiguity. Dinner is not the issue. He made a gross move on me and that is the issue here. Reply First off am genuinely sorry to read you did not feel safe in your work settings, that is a big burden to bear. What am trying to understand is: how is it that someone can be a sexual predator (i.e. there is a consistent and predictable pattern of illegal behaviour) and yet said person does manage to be so without falling outside the bounds of the law (since the letter Lior posted states \u2018the examples that we encountered from the last few years do not fall under the category of sexual harassment from a legal point of view senior researcher should not approach a junior researcher with an invitation that may be viewed as intimate or personal unless such an invitation was issued in the past by this specific junior to that specific senior think this principle needs some clarification. For example maybe the junior person one time issues an invitation that could 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 14/82 November 28, 2018 at 7:42 am PalyB November 29, 2018 at 1:22 am eventhisoneistaken November 28, 2018 at 3:30 pm eventhisoneistaken November 28, 2018 at 3:33 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) be viewed as intimate or personal (but didn\u2019t mean it that way), and this does not entitle the senior person to repeatedly issue such invitations. Reply To anyone of conscience and/or intellect, your reaction is perfectly predictable \u2026 yet the letter was still posted. Perhaps you can gain civil perspective on this issue, and perhaps you cannot. In any case, here it is in the hopes that you will absorb both its truth and principle: The divisiveness of this situation as described lies not in the willingness of the authors to post the letter, but rather in the willingness of some males of our species to treat females in such a fashion. Anyone with significant work experience is likely to have already witnessed how males often treat females verbally, with personal interaction, and in all-male conversation, and so there certainly isn\u2019t anything to debate regarding the theory of the described scenario. The only debate is whether you trust the statement offered by the several authors of the letter, who were willing to put themselves into possible harm\u2019s way in order to issue that letter. At the very least would hope you can agree with the social principle that in a professional environment (in particular in an environment where one\u2019s intellect is the primary tool being utilized), female colleagues are, literally to be treated in such a manner. Reply Which part of the Zuleikha project do you object to, Nicolas Bray? It clearly states that the issue is men *falsely* accused of harassment. Do you not think such men have rights? Deserve protection? Reply People like Lior Pachter are causing women very real harm: pachters/ Reply Do you think he cares? He only cares about his own virtue signaling. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 15/82 November 28, 2018 at 8:32 pm Nicolas Bray November 28, 2018 at 11:13 pm eventhisoneistaken November 28, 2018 at 11:38 pm Nicolas Bray November 28, 2018 at 11:50 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) November 29, 2018 at 12:40 am Nicolas Bray This is like watching a pair of monkeys try to discuss group theory: it\u2019s really not that complicated but they\u2019re congenitally incapable of understanding it. Replying to Nicolas Bray: There is a substantive argument being made here (at the link) about harm to women, which you completely evade. You call us monkeys yet you\u2019re the one flinging poo. No, there is not a substantive argument being made at the link. It is like the rest of the sophistry you churn out, except perhaps more disingenuous than usual since, as we both know, you do not give a shit about harm to women. And didn\u2019t call you monkeys. It\u2019s an analogy agree with my learned colleague. Instead of flinging poop (an analogy, of course), why don\u2019t you articulate your position and enlighten us. Your \u201csophistry: comment sounds like a typical don\u2019t care about facts o reason just care about my feelings, which has been playing in a tight loop coming from the left for the last, oh, 100 years or so. You disagree? State your case cogently was going to actually write something but think I\u2019ll let eventhisoneistaken make the case for me. Please consult the following post: #MenToo and the Zuleikha project Amidst the #metoo moral panic, you can count on to provide a contrarian voice. This time, however, we\u2019d like to try our hand at some real-life activism. The precise details will emerge in future posts, but for now we\u2019re recruiting our multitudes of loyal readers for assistance. The #mentoo hashtag (apparently) documents the various \u2026 Continue reading 6 posttenuretourettes 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 16/82 November 29, 2018 at 9:16 am eventhisoneistaken November 28, 2018 at 5:56 pm Anima November 28, 2018 at 7:23 pm Anon November 28, 2018 at 8:38 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) November 28, 2018 at 8:40 pm Nicolas Bray November 28, 2018 at 8:11 pm Anima Which part of the Zuleikha project do you object to, Nicolas Bray? It clearly states that the issue is men *falsely* accused of harassment. Do you not think such men have rights? Deserve protection had a nauseating experience with yuval peres when was younger know many other women who did. This is an open secret and yet nothing is ever done. He invited me to 1-1 dinner when was younger didn\u2019t anything twice have had dinner with so many amazing male researchers and that is not the issue. As we were leaving he hugged me closely and gave me this looks and invited me to the swimming pool. It was unmistakable. This is textbook sexual harassment and there is no ambiguity here felt worthless and it really affected my self esteem when was younger was so angry wanted to discuss research with him and all he did was to treat me like a piece of meat. Reply Thank you Anima, for your courage to share your experience publicly have a female friend who shared with me (5-10 years ago) that she had an almost identical \u201cnauseating experience\u201d with Yuval. She did share it with people at Microsoft Research, but did not make it public (for multiple reasons, among them, fearing retaliation). Reply Fair enough respect your courage in sharing your experience (and am sorry you had it). On the other hand, this does not change my opinion of the inappropriateness (the mildest word could find) of Lior et al\u2019s zero-information smears. Reply I\u2019m so sorry that you had to deal with that. The horrible irony is that it\u2019s the victims of sexual harassment who so frequently feel worthless when it\u2019s people like Peres who should be too ashamed to show their faces in public. Reply And it is sickening that Yuval gives examples of his female collaborators as 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 17/82 November 29, 2018 at 4:53 am Yuval Rabani November 29, 2018 at 7:50 am Lior Pachter November 29, 2018 at 1:21 pm Nicolas Bray evidence of his good behavior. It is a classic behavior of sexual predators to make sure they have female allies Reply don\u2019t have any firsthand information regarding the specific case, but do want to point out a couple of more general issues that come up through the discussion: 1. Lior believe, confesses to a violation of Title requirements that apply to American universities, whereby professors are obligated to report allegations of sexual harassment, **even if the source of information requests confidentiality**. Israeli universities (at least the one work at) are subject to different regulatory requirements, whereby professors who do not hold one of a number of administrative positions (such as department chair) are obligated to report **unless confidentiality is requested believe the Title requirements are damaging, because they often mean that a harassed individual is isolated from seeking useful advice (for instance, from their advisor or from a female faculty member), unless they\u2019ve already decided on their own that they don\u2019t mind that a formal complaint be filed. This places victims in a very lonely position. 2. That said, my very limited information indicates that often the advice that is given in confidence by (well-meaning) powerful researchers in such cases is very poor. It\u2019s more or less \u201cshut up because we\u2019re helpless and you might get hurt.\u201d Anima has tweeted eloquently the effects of shutting up: simmering frustration at feeling worthless and in a toxic environment. It often doesn\u2019t take much to do something at least somewhat useful about it, and some relatively small but quick response is often a lot better than doing nothing. In part, it\u2019s better because feeling helpless is lousy, but it may also help deter future misbehavior. Reply To clarify, the confidential information that was relayed to me (and the request for confidentiality) was done in a setting of a small committee where others were present including more senior people in the department who would have been the ones to report to therefore don\u2019t believe was in violation of Title in this specific case but your point is well taken. Title reporting requirements override requests for confidentiality. Reply I\u2019m curious what point you\u2019re making with point 1. It begins with a tone of 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 18/82 November 29, 2018 at 4:23 pm Yuval Rabani November 29, 2018 at 6:24 am Anonymous2718 November 29, 2018 at 6:36 am Oded Goldreich accusation but it ends with a criticism of the basis of that accusation. The result is somewhat hard to interpret. Reply didn\u2019t intend to accuse, just to alert Lior as to possible implications of his post. But the main point was trying to convey is that believe Title reporting requirements are harmful. It\u2019s one thing to require department chairs and the like to ignore confidentiality requests. It\u2019s a completely different thing to extend this requirement to everyone think it is a good thing to shine light on behavior that we do not wish to tolerate in society. But think the way forward is not simply to villainize and ostracize the perpetrators but help them get the treatment or help they need to change know Yuval Peres and some of his circle, who think he would consider friends, personally. When first started to hear about these allegations asked one of these people to talk with him and perhaps guide him towards getting help or counseling, but the person chose to ignore the issue or not get involved. We need to give space to the victims of sexual harassment to state what has happened to them (the more people that are willing to come forward and relate their stories, the better), and also to understand the reasons for why harassment exists and address it \u2013 not simply by punishment. That is treating the symptoms and not the underlying problem. Reply As another co-author of the original email wish to join Ehud request that you remove the post or at least anonymize the offender\u2019s name (by using a label as NAME) as well as identifying information wish to stress that this request is made on behalf of myself and not as a result of any request made by anyhow else (incl do realize that you have no legal obligation to follow our request, but think that ethics goes beyond the law. This is actually the case wrt the subject of our letter; we rejected the opinion that this issue should be left to the law enforcing institutes, let alone that the recent cases we focused on ,may not be illegal, and thought that violations of ethics count too and may be handled at the level of the relevant community and rely on less rigid procedures. (Indeed, the rigid procedures seem to hinder the treatment of such cases, since the victims prefer not to risk using them.) 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 19/82 November 29, 2018 at 1:46 pm Lior Pachter For this reason, we chose not to make our letter totally public (e.g., to post in on blogs of our own friends), but rather to share its contents with a large set of colleagues. We did take into account that they may share it with their own colleagues, but assumed that publicity will stop at the borders of the relevant research communities. The posting on Stanford\u2019s theory\u2019s mail digest was/is an ***unintended*** consequence of our permission to forward our mail to that group. Indeed, many asked us for explicit permission to forward to others, which we granted, and two have asked for permission to post on a departmental/group list, which we granted too. In retrospect think we made a mistake in not stating our assumptions and/or requests explicitly. What would have said is: 1. You have permission to share with friends and colleagues, and do not need to notify us of doing so. 2. We will grant permission to post on a dept-mailing list, but wish to be notified of this. 3. Please do not post our text on a public media such as a blog or webpage, and please forward the above instructions to whoever you forward our text. Turning back to my second paragraph believe that keeping the current post will hinder rather than promote the cause we are fighting for. Oded Goldreich Reply Hi Oded, Thanks for posting appreciate the clarification of the intended audience of your letter, and your request for me to delete or redact the post. First think it\u2019s helpful that briefly describe my policy for editing the blog have always been careful to accompany edits/updates with a log (usually of the form [update: date, change do sometimes fix very minor typos without a log (for example a missing letter) when the change does not alter meaning. Overall think of the blog as do of the arXiv; my posts and the associated comments are intended to be permanent. With that in mind, neither deleting the post nor redacting names is compatible with my policy but nevertheless have carefully considered your request. You state that your intent was \u201cto share [the letter\u2019s] contents with a large set of colleagues\u201d and that the \u201cpublicity will stop at the borders of the relevant research communities note that the letter was sent to 34 recipients who collectively work in 16 institutions. Perhaps the letter was bcc-ed to additional recipients, but at least insofar as the public recipient list goes don\u2019t agree that it consists of \u201ca large set of colleagues\u201d. There are huge gaps in terms of institutions and senior faculty/scientists that Yuval interacts with posted your letter on my blog not to fill in those gaps but so that *junior* faculty, postdocs and students would find out about his \u201caggressive advances toward young women, usually with no previous friendly connections with 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 20/82 November 29, 2018 at 1:48 pm Lior Pachter him [that] puts them in a vulnerable position of fearing to cross a senior scientist who might have an impact on their career thought it important that students, postdocs and junior faculty would find out that there have been \u201ctwo \u2018big\u2019 cases of sexual harassment that led to severe sanctions against him by his employer\u2026.and to the termination of his connections with [a] University thought about whether to post or not carefully, because as said above the posts are permanent, and also know they are generally widely read decided to do it because did not believe that could in good conscience, given my past knowledge of his behavior which was corroborated by your letter, *not* alert future potential victims was influenced by your collective reputation (yourself, Irit and Ehud), people have held in high regard my whole career, and by your statement that your letter was triggered by \u201cfirst and second-hand testimonies (by people [you] trust without a shed of doubt) of at least five additional cases.\u201d In terms of what your letter or this post will hinder or promote will say that it is my belief that propagating information about harassment only among senior colleagues perpetuates a culture of power imbalance where senior faculty hold all the cards. It has been my experience in academia that senior faculty do not always sit down with new trainees and warn them of all the predators they know about, nor have observed \u201cword of mouth\u201d to be very effective at conferences. For these reasons will not remove the blog post nor redact it. Lior Reply Hi Oded, Thanks for posting appreciate the clarification of the intended audience of your letter, and your request for me to delete or redact the post. First think it\u2019s helpful that briefly describe my policy for editing the blog have always been careful to accompany edits/updates with a log (usually of the form [update: date, change do sometimes fix very minor typos without a log (for example a missing letter) when the change does not alter meaning. Overall think of the blog as do of the arXiv; my posts and the associated comments are intended to be permanent. With that in mind, neither deleting the post nor redacting names is compatible with my policy but nevertheless have carefully considered your request. You state that your intent was \u201cto share [the letter\u2019s] contents with a large set of colleagues\u201d and that the \u201cpublicity will stop at the borders of the relevant research communities note that the letter was sent to 34 recipients who collectively work in 16 institutions. Perhaps the letter was bcc-ed to additional recipients, but at least insofar as the public recipient list goes don\u2019t agree that it consists of \u201ca large set of colleagues\u201d. There are huge gaps in terms of institutions and senior faculty/scientists that Yuval interacts with 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 21/82 November 30, 2018 at 3:36 am Oded Goldreich posted your letter on my blog not to fill in those gaps but so that *junior* faculty, postdocs and students would find out about his \u201caggressive advances toward young women, usually with no previous friendly connections with him [that] puts them in a vulnerable position of fearing to cross a senior scientist who might have an impact on their career thought it important that students, postdocs and junior faculty would find out that there have been \u201ctwo \u2018big\u2019 cases of sexual harassment that led to severe sanctions against him by his employer\u2026.and to the termination of his connections with [a] University thought about whether to post or not carefully, because as said above the posts are permanent, and also know they are generally widely read decided to do it because did not believe that could in good conscience, given my past knowledge of his behavior which was corroborated by your letter, *not* alert future potential victims was influenced by your collective reputation (yourself, Irit and Ehud), people have held in high regard my whole career, and by your statement that your letter was triggered by \u201cfirst and second-hand testimonies (by people [you] trust without a shed of doubt) of at least five additional cases.\u201d In terms of what your letter or this post will hinder or promote will say that it is my belief that propagating information about harassment only among senior colleagues perpetuates a culture of power imbalance where senior faculty hold all the cards. It has been my experience in academia that senior faculty do not always sit down with new trainees and warn them of all the predators they know about, nor have observed \u201cword of mouth\u201d to be very effective at conferences. For these reasons will not remove the blog post nor redact it. Lior Reply Dear Lior disagree with your interpretation of our choice to sent our email to a group of 30-35 senior researchers. Our objective was to make *them* aware so that *they* take actions of various types, incl warning potential victims. That is believe that taking potentially controversial actions aimed at changing things in the community is primary the responsibility of the more senior, who can afford to take the risks involved. In order words view our email as a call to duty, rather than as \u201cclosing ranks.\u201d In any case agree that alternatives ways of action would have been reasonable too, but this is the way we chose (and was asking you to respect it \u2014 see next). Indeed see the issue at hand as respecting a request for avoiding public posting of a message that the authors did not intend to be *widely public*, 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 22/82 November 30, 2018 at 12:37 am turing but failed to spot a loophole that allowed their message to be posted on a public log/archive (i.e., Stanford\u2019s). (Indeed, why is that log public natural tendency to accommodate these not-careful-enough authors stands in contrast here with potential principles/policies/practices of maintaining a blog, including the one you pointed out. Still, in my opinion, the violation of these potential editorial principles can be justified by citing my explicit request (i.e., \u201cblaming\u201d me) and replacing the name of the offended by (or \u201cname withheld\u201d). Ditto for other identifying information guess that at this time asking to remove the entire post and the numerous comments is not reasonable. In addition to respecting a reasonable request of a colleague, out of sheer collegiality think that our joint cause will be better served this way. Whatever could have been achieved wrt NAME, was achieved already, and now look at the wider perspective. From that perspective, given the sensitivity of these issues, respecting the wishes of the victims and also of the reporters is of paramount importance. Needless to say, the victims come first, at \u201cinfinitely\u201d greater priority than the reporters, but still the reporters are of priority viz a viz anything else (but the victims)\u2026. Finally, let me point out that you could have written a post of yourself about NAME, without quoting our text in full but rather informing the readers of its contents (esp., the claims it makes wrt existence of reliable evidence regarding unwanted initiate propositions and what these have caused the victims). This would have served your goal of \u201cnot keeping silent\u201d jst as well, but without using \u201cmy hand\u201d towards your goals. Dear Oded, You, Irit and Ehud have chosen to compose this email and widely share it. Surely it occurred to you that a fully public posting such as this was possible and, indeed, probable. The responsibility for the outcomes (good or bad) of this rests on your shoulders, not Lior\u2019s, and you should not expect it to be taken down. By now this is indexed by Google and so forth am torn about whether support your actions. On one hand, it seems clear that something should be done regarding Yuval\u2019s behavior (and do not doubt your accusations). This email is something, which is better than nothing. On the other hand, \u201conline lynchings\u201d lack any semblance of process or proportionality certainly hope this is not a model for how sexual harassment allegations should be handled. Regards junior theory person. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 23/82 November 30, 2018 at 4:14 am Oded Goldreich November 30, 2018 at 7:17 am Anonymous November 30, 2018 at 9:23 am Oded Goldreich Reply Dear turing was not trying to push the responsibility to Lior, but rather asked him to remove the name of the offender from the copy of our email that he cited am well aware, that have no legal right to ask this, but still think that do have a moral right to ask this do believe that an email can be sent to a wide circulation and readers be asked not to be made totally public. That is see a difference between sharing it with relevant people (within our community) and making it available to the wide public (via a public blog). Our failure, as see it, is in not making this request explicit wonder what Lior or others would have done in such a case share your general dilemma about the handling of such cases, when the victims are typically unwilling to file a compliant with some official body that has official juristic mechanisms. But think that at this case things are quite straightforward, since the two relevant facts we stated were: (1) that proposals that can be reasonably interpreted as intimate were made, and (2) that the impact of these on the victims was devastating (e.g., skip[ping conferences, lectures, and job opportunities). We don\u2019t really need the offender\u2019s perspective wrt (1), unless we believe that the victims are insane, and hat the offender\u2019s view is irrelevant wrt (2). Note that make no claim regarding the offender\u2019s intentions in the proposals \u2014 for this we would need to hear him and maybe cross-examine him \u2014 but rather that it was reasonable to interpret the proposals in that way. (Actually believe that different interpretations are unreasonable, but this is not part of our accusation.) Sorry, but why are you the gatekeeper of who should know this information and who should not and many of my friends in the theory community would not have known anything if it weren\u2019t for this blog post because we are not senior, are not close to any of those you chose to e-mail, and are not at Stanford. To be honest, it sounds like you only care about those at prestigious institutions and that you do not care if members of the community who are not at places like Stanford get harassed. Reply Just saw this really cannot handle this media think answered your question in my last two emails. Again, I\u2019m not a gatekeeper, but believe have some moral rights on my own texts. And we thought that the right action at this time was to call a large group of seniors for actions of various types, per their duties of seniority. We kept the option of wider circulation for later (and recall that none of this is 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 24/82 November 30, 2018 at 9:36 am Anonymous November 30, 2018 at 10:13 am Oded Goldreich new staff). It is perfectly for others to act differently (i.e., make a public statement of their own), but why do they use our text (rather than extract some facts from it) in blunt violation of our wishes? Hi Oded. It might not be new stuff to you (or to those you\u2019ve chosen to inform), but it certainly is very new to a large group of vulnerable people who, arguably, are the ones who actually need this information. As a young female academic who has (very recently) had some sub-optimal interactions with the subject of this post would have very much appreciated knowing about the two \u201cbig\u201d incidents which seem to have been handled largely behind closed doors. Maybe this knowledge would have changed my experiences, and the experience of others. Very likely, there is knowledge out there (kept very neatly in the \u201cright\u201d circles) that would prevent future negative experiences will have, but due to concern for the perpetrators (and the disruption of *their* life/work/family), that information will not reach me in time. It\u2019s fine that you did not want your text replicated in this public forum, but the initial protests (albeit, which came from Ehud) were regarding how this publicity would affect the subject\u2019s personal life. When will this community start caring about mine am not Ehud, i\u2019m Oded wonder if you really rear my text carefully. It should have been clear to you that we were deeply concerned about the situation exactly because we care about junior female researchers and the price that they pay, regardless of their affiliation missed the unkind comment re affiliation before, but fully pardon it since it is clear that we are all very emotional about this issue and for good reasons\u2026) This specific case is a story that has been going on for years, some institutions took some actions and some did not am not aware of the exact details of all, since these institutions kept it secret. Although we did hear first and second hand of the old stories (at the said institutes), we felt that we should not act on them (given that these institutes have supposedly investigated and decided on specific actions), but there are indeed at the background. What called us to action were the accumulation of more recent stories of unwelcomed proposals of intimate nature (or to be more careful \u2014 as I\u2019ve been above \u2014 proposals that can be reasonably interpreted as having an intimate nature). At some point, we decided to act, and took a specific course of action (see our posted text, which reports on part of it). Why we did not act before is a good 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 25/82 November 30, 2018 at 4:34 pm Anonymous December 1, 2018 at 2:57 am Oded Goldreich question. It has to do with the fact that his main community only borders ours, with the fact that with time we learned more and more stories, with the fact that it takes time to investigate the stories (while being respectful of the victims), and more. We decided to take a specific course of action admitted that would consider other courses of actions (like a public post) reasonable, but we decided to do it differently. Our considerations are not adequate for a public post. Given all circumstances fail to see why it was so urgent to post our email on a public blog, a day or so after it was sent and without consulting us. And, again, there were also other alternatives. But Lior has had his considerations and acted as he did respect it, but still may think that he did a mistake. Finally, let\u2019s remember that we are all on the same side of the struggle for a better society (or at least better research community), in which junior females will be free from the anxiety of imposing propositions that do not respect their autonomy and hinder their life. Oded know that you are not Ehud, which is why qualified my statement with that note. And you are correct: One day might not make a difference (although, it very well *might*). Rather it is the 10+ years that this has been ongoing as an \u201copen secret\u201d that bothers me. Any vitriol you may have detected in my post was unintended, or at the least, was certainly not directed towards Lior, you, or the other writers of the email am well aware that there are good people in this community (you lot included), who are hoping and striving for a better, more inclusive environment. But, please note that what might not seem \u201curgent\u201d to you *is* exactly that to me, and many people like me. One week \u2014 one day \u2014 can make the difference to stop an interaction that pushes someone to quit a position (there have been several events that have shaken me enough to be quite close to that). So, while not directly aimed at you, please do excuse my frustration on just now finding out that everything that has happened with this specific case in the last several years could have been prevented if the people involved (again, not just you) were more concerned with the safety of future victims than of the \u201cappropriateness\u201d of the course of action. To Anonymous@4:34pm do sympathize with your anger and frustration and pardoned you already for being a bit harsh. What was important for me was to clarify where (and others) stand wrt this annoying phenomenon. We are extremely upset and would do our best to eliminate it. But we do ask for your trust and comradeship, while understanding that this is not a trivial request nor easy to grant. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 26/82 November 30, 2018 at 1:37 am Anonymous November 30, 2018 at 4:25 am Anonymous November 30, 2018 at 5:53 am Oded Goldreich Regarding your specific points. Yes, it seems that this was going on for many years, but *we* only heard of it a few months ago (maybe a year don\u2019t recall). Recall that this is not exactly our community (definitely not mine \u2014 I\u2019m doing proper). At some point it down on us that, since it does not seem to stop, we should act. We had to confirm the rumors, and do so without harming the victims, who are not people we know well. Doing so took some time. Then, we tried one action, and it did not seem to yield satisfactory results, and so we went for the current one. Within such a context, another day or a week does not seem that crucial, although there is a non-negligible probability that another abuse will occur exactly at that time period. On the other hand, the odds are not that high (esp., given our second action, which has had a tremendous effect (before the post!); if they were, I\u2019d not say that a day/week does not matter much. You may disagree with my calculations, but please believe me that they are not based on indifference to potential suffering of others. I\u2019d say the same if this was risking my own suffering with the same odds. Please trust us more. Oded Thank you, Lior, for sharing this agree with your assessment that junior members of the community, especially students, were largely *not* aware of this situation until now. To a woman at the start of her career in TCS, this sort of information is critical; it disappoints me to see how many would prefer to shelter the accused rather than consider the interests of the wider community. Reply \u201cIn terms of what your letter or this post will hinder or promote will say that it is my belief that propagating information about harassment only among senior colleagues perpetuates a culture of power imbalance where senior faculty hold all the cards. It has been my experience in academia that senior faculty do not always sit down with new trainees and warn them of all the predators they know about, nor have observed \u201cword of mouth\u201d to be very effective at conferences. For these reasons will not remove the blog post nor redact it have nothing more to add, but think this is a very solid justification for this post am a junior woman, and have never personally been warned about harassers. Thank you, Lior, for posting this. Reply The question whether we are better off or not with Lior\u2019s post is not the one 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 27/82 December 4, 2018 at 9:21 pm Anonymous raised can see PROs and CONs, and short-term vs long-term considerations. Of course, an opinion of a junior female may carry more weight here than that of a senior male, but still\u2026 Anyhow, the question raised is whether it was for Lior to reproduce a letter sent over in restricted (but not private) distribution, without asking for the authors\u2019 content, and to refuse their request to remove or detract it, all in service of what he believes to be the promotion of good. Would it be for somebody in my dept to post a message send on the dept\u2019s distribution list (which includes hundreds of subscribers)? Does the answer change if explicitly ask in my email not to do so don\u2019t think we should seek categorical answers to such questions, but rather circumstantial ones. In my opinion, in the current circumstances, Lior should have acted as Ehud and asked. But do view his different opinion as legitimate and do not hold it against him. Still maintain mine don\u2019t like BLOGs in general, and may not read further posts and respond to them will be happy to discuss anything over email (regardless of the number of people being CCed see a fundamental difference between corresponding in email (even in a large group) and public posts. Oded Goldreich Reply Dear Oded, You have defended your decision multiple times in this thread without elaborating on the CONs except that it would negatively affect offender\u2019s family. Shell assume this is the only you have to offer? It is also enlightening that all the past and present institutions who have or might have taken seret disciplinary action against the said offender have made exact same decision of not making any of it public and keep it tightly wrapped with chosen senior principals. With your continual demands to follow this same pattern to Lior suggests that you are in full agreement with how any such future offenders should be dealt with even if it were to general similar outcome of decade long continuation of behaviour pattern as in this specific case. I\u2019m also not unable to avoid the impression that you and other authors of the email might be for such offenders to exist in the community as long as they follow the principles you and other authors have laid out in email and deemed to be sufficient to prevent the damages. This sort of decisions that would affect wide community are clearly being taken in select biased circle without any visibility, review or acceptance of the members for the policies being proposed. In any case, I\u2019m still interested in list of CONs you have to offer against making this information public. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 28/82 November 30, 2018 at 11:07 am Anonymous November 30, 2018 at 11:52 am Oded Goldreich November 30, 2018 at 12:43 pm lovelace November 30, 2018 at 1:59 pm Josh Benningham am disheartened to see the tone of some of the comments criticizing Ehud, Irit, and Oded. It is clear to me that they are doing their best to help correct some of the problems in the field with no real personal benefit to them am a female undergraduate in computer science, and it has been very uplifting to see such influential researchers spend their time to help minorities in this field. Clearly reasonable people can disagree on what was the optimal course of action, but seeing that several senior people do care about this issue has made me more hopeful about my future in this field. Thank you for your efforts. Reply Thanks for these kind words (@11:07am). It does empower me. But don\u2019t worry, I\u2019m not offended at all by the critiques nor by the tones, although one might have been offended by some of the remarks view these remarks as demonstrating a feeling of distrust at seniors and/or at males, and view the problem as being the circumstances that led some to such a distrust. What we need to do is change the circumstances, and in the meanwhile build some trust in one another. Till then, we should not be too taken back by the distrust. Thanks again for caring about our feelings. Oded Reply I\u2019d also like to express my great appreciation for Ehud, Irit, Oded, and Lior for the various ways you have helped and will help junior women in the future with the email (Ehud, Irit, Oded), the blog post (Lior), and all of your sincere discussions in these comments make no stance on the appropriateness of the blog post. This comment is meant to show my sincere and tremendous appreciation on the part of a junior female researcher for the effort and care you have shown. Regardless of whether the email was meant to be public, Ehud, Irit, and Oded chose to send it with the knowledge that backlash is likely and *have* (along with Lior) taken that backlash valiantly as demonstrated here in the comments. Thank you, Ehud, Irit, Oded, and Lior. Reply think Yuval should have been given a chance to respond found incredibly unconvincing the four reasons given in the 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 29/82 November 30, 2018 at 3:40 pm Lior Pachter November 30, 2018 at 11:39 pm Josh Benningham email that he should not be given the chance think analogues of those reasons could apply to any case of potential misconduct \u2014 one cannot simply repeat the allegations and their impacts as reasons the accused should not have a chance to respond. Certainly blogging about situation makes it reach a much wider audience. Reply In terms of Yuval being given a chance to respond: 1. He was sanctioned for his harassment and he did not respond. More women were harassed. 2 senior colleague confronted him and he did not respond. More women were harassed. 3. He received a letter from conference organizers detailing concerns with his behavior and even then, he did not respond. After all of these non-responses, in a bid to prevent harassment of more women, three of his colleagues who seem to have been alarmed drafted a letter and sent it to 34 other senior colleagues. The only reasonable thing can think of to say to Irit Dinur, Ehud Friedgut and Oded Goldreich is thank you. Thank you. By the way, with the Dinur-Friedgut,-Goldreich letter public Yuval did respond (see above), and his response was that he \u201cmust have been tone deaf\u201d. Given that he was sanctioned and confronted and still harassed women have to say don\u2019t really understand what he means. He also added that he collaborated with many women which is another way to say \u201cplease think of all the women i *didn\u2019t* sexually harass!\u201d He also apparently regrets not following some principle and he did apologize to some conference organizers. What he did *not* do is articulate any regret for what his actions did to the women he harassed (on these very pages one of them talks about how he made her feel worthless and negatively affected her self esteem), voice any concern for their welfare, nor apologize to them. That seems to me to be a much bigger problem than whether or not he should have been given (yet) another chance to respond. Reply Good points. You have changed my mind, and now agree with you. One nitpick though \u2014 it seems Yuval did show some regret when he said will regretfully rescind my acceptance to deliver a keynote talk in the conference that sparked their message\u201d. His email is weird though. It seems like he is taking some responsibility but not really\u2026 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 30/82 November 30, 2018 at 10:52 pm Not Disclosing December 1, 2018 at 2:39 am Oded Goldreich thank Anima for her courage to give a public testimony. With that testimony, any right, if anybody even had, to request Lior to redact Yuval Peres name is gone. Irit, Ehud, and Oded, we are thankful to you to take concrete action to bring the issue to the community, but please do realize that as soon as one of the victims made her testimony public, the issue has become public, and none of us have any right to request Lior for confidentiality. Further, Yuval Peres has to bear any consequences, whether it is his family finds out or his close friends (including non-scientists) do. Certainly Anima had to suffer the harassment, and her family and friends can also find out, and that is why her courage is worthy of our gratitude. Reply will be addressing Josh\u2019s comments at length later, but let me start by replying to \u201cNot Disclosing\u201d. We did not ask for comments of others to be removed view such a request as utterly immoral. We asked for our own 5text to be removed or detracted. Now admit that the publicity has had some benefits \u2014 most importantly, in my opinion, empowering victims and potential victims (not only of NAME). But do see a problems with a practice of not respecting requests of authors\u2019 regarding their text, even when this is done in the promotion of good am not saying that this should be disallowed categorically, but rather that one should carefully examine the circumstances still maintain that in this case it would have been better to anonymize the text, and this can still be done and affect future google searches. But let me turn to a much more important issue am not satisfied by Lior\u2019s answer to Josh, and by Josh accepting it. As far as I\u2019m concern, the main argument is as follows (reproduced and augmented from a prior comment of mine): In this case [as well as similar ones] things are quite straightforward, since the two relevant facts are: (1) that proposals that can be reasonably interpreted as intimate were made, and (2) that the impact of these on the victims was devastating (e.g., skipping conferences, lectures, and job opportunities). We don\u2019t really need the offender\u2019s perspective wrt (1), unless we believe that all victims are insane, and the offender\u2019s view is irrelevant wrt (2). Note that make no claim regarding the offender\u2019s intentions in the proposals \u2014 to support such a claims we would need to hear him and maybe cross- examine him \u2014 but rather claim that it was reasonable to interpret the proposals as intimate/sexual. (Actually believe that different interpretations are unreasonable, but this is not part of my claim (1).) 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 31/82 December 1, 2018 at 3:28 am Saint Thomas December 1, 2018 at 5:59 am Oded Goldreich To summarize, the reason that confirmation is not really necessary is that the claimed facts are so simple/elementary that verification is a futile exercise in formalities am best know for research in cryptography that promoted use of precise/formal definitions, however never saw definitions/formalism as a goal (but rather as a tool to clarify complex issues).] Second, confirmation is not possible since the victims refused to disclose their identity, whereas providing even basic details of the specific proposal (e.g., where and when) would disclose their identity (at least to NAME), or at the very least they were reasonable in fearing that this may happen 9and may have negative consequences on their well-being). This is a crucial point that refers to all cases of sexual harassment. Combined with the claim that confirmation is not really necessary (when a handful of people testify of the same basic/elementary behavior), this means that if we seek a social change then we should not insist on the futile formal exercise. The mention of the social is not a coincidence. In contrast to the imaginary perception (currently promoted by Neo-liberalism) by which the foregoing violation can be understood in terms of interaction between two individuals who live in outer space, these violations take place within a social context. It is not making an inappropriate proposal to Y, where both may be considered equal regarding the proposal and/or the situation. It is a senior- male making an inappropriate proposition to a junior-female in a social context in which seniority carries power and the male-female axis is aligned with power relations in the society at large. Just try to imagine the scenario of a junior-female making an inappropriate proposal to a senior-male. All this is meant to say that one should not be surprised that victims of sexual harassment are extremely reluctant to complain. Indeed, saints as Anima and do exist, but one cannot base a social order on saints. The fact is that all those who have informed us of such proposals in the past (and a few who informed us in private following our email to the selected group) preferred to remain unanimous. Reply \u201csaints\u201d as Anima? Oded, it seems you are being sarcastic here. Reply Did not mean to be sarcastic. Why do you think so? Unless misunderstood, she came out public saying she was harassed by NAME. If this is not the case, then i take the saint label back. In any case, what meant to say is that we cannot rely on people doing such heroic deeds. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 32/82 December 1, 2018 at 6:40 am Doubting Thomas December 1, 2018 at 8:12 am Oded Goldreich December 1, 2018 at 3:53 am Oded Goldreich December 1, 2018 at 9:58 am Not Disclosing The victims who chose to be anonymous are not less saintly or less heroic. It is their choice and let us respect that choice think either you or are confusing saints with victims do respect and am empathic of all victims, but was using saints to refer to those who chose to file a complaint, with no intention to disrespect those who did not (i.e., not being a saint is being human\u2026). In any case, my point is that social order cannot and should not rely on extraordinary actions (as filing complaints in current circumstances WRITE: Indeed, saints as Anima and the victim-that-complained-to-the-employer-of do exist, but one cannot base a social order on saints. The fact is that all those who have informed us of such proposals in the past (and a few who informed us in private following our email to the selected group) preferred to remain unanimous. Reply You certainly have copyright to your original text, but not on the information am with you that the entire letter should not be reproduced without the consent of at least one author. Though your objection is not with the text, since at some point you permit Lior to reproduce the text but redact Yuval\u2019s name. So your objection is with the information, and the information does not belong to you. You could have a moral right if you had requested confidentiality (of the information) from the original recipients, but even there, your intend was that the original recipients disseminate the information as they deemed fit to protect the future junior female scientists. One of the recipient deemed fit to post it on a public mailing list, and a reader of the public mailing list (Lior) deemed it fit to post it on a blog. Bottom line of my opinion is that you have moral and as a matter of fact, even legal right to ask Lior to remove your text. You created it, and you have copyright on it. Redacting Yuval\u2019s name is not your call though. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 33/82 December 1, 2018 at 10:20 am Oded Goldreich December 1, 2018 at 10:15 pm Not Disclosing would be fine with him stating the information as something he has read on a distribution list, and would have appreciated him getting in touch with us and consulting about that matter before posting anything. If the information is public, supposedly regardless of our email, then why does he need to rely on us and post our email? If it relies on our email, then he does need our consent, since it should have been clear (although we neglected to state it explicitly) that we did not intend it to be posted on a public place such as a blog. We did not say that the original recipients were free to disseminate as they deem fit, and none of them understood it so. Some asked for permissions, and \u2014 if recall right \u2014 at some point we said that people should feel free to forward to friends etc. No recipient (till now\u2026 as far as know\u2026) has posted it on a public mailing list. Two have posted it on a dept-mailing list, and one of these lists is logged on a public domain, a fact that neither the poster nor we knew\u2026. Before proceeding, let me stress that we are holding a discussion of a secondary point, which do care about too, but no reader should get the idea as if don\u2019t see it as secondary to the actual contents of this entire thread. Still, the question pose is whether this is the behavior we want to see (wrt confidentiality of emails), in general and in such cases think that adopting the norm that one can post any contents that one received by mistake, without consulting the sender, is going to hurt the cause of making our community safe from unwelcomed propositions of intimate nature and other forms of inappropriate behavior, since email discussions regarding violations play a role in our struggle and protecting their non- publicity may be important. Oded get your viewpoint. Usually, my understanding is, when content is given (your email), that still belongs to the author. But the information in the content belongs to recipient as much as the sender, unless confidentiality is expected. The original email you wrote, it gives no expectation of information being confidential. My viewpoint is that it is wrong to violate your content rights by replicating your email. But also see that your primary objection is to the information, since you requested to redact Yuval Peres name. Once a victim has publicly testified, then even if confidentiality of the information was expected, that expectation is now lost. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 34/82 December 1, 2018 at 3:44 am Tom December 1, 2018 at 6:37 am Oded Goldreich December 1, 2018 at 6:51 am Tom December 1, 2018 at 8:15 am Oded Goldreich Again agree that Lior is wrong by violating your copyright, both morally and even legally in some jurisdictions. Once you have given him the notice to remove the content, which you clearly have numerous time above, he should remove your content, and rewrite the information in his own words and form agree with Oded that their step was reasonable and there was no immediate need for public stone pelting which Lior seems to be fond of. It would be good if it stops all future harassments but at the same time it may create an unnecessary distrust between senior male researchers and junior female researchers. Capital punishment has not ended rapes and mob lynching wont stop sexual harassment. Another point want to make is about mental harassment (not of sexual nature) which young male researchers face sometimes from senior male researchers. Although community in general is friendly, there are bullies who demoralize young members. In my opinion, this is not \u201cless serious\u201d than sexual harassments know people who decided to switch to other field by being subjected to this. Reply Tom\u2019s comment finds me on the guilty side do recall a few times was too aggressive in seminars or in voicing critique in person was carried away by my passion regarding contents and presentation (see later tried to correct the damage, in face to face discussion, and also tried to be more careful in the future. Oded Reply Dear Oded, please do not be guilty. You are a much loved member in the community. It is important to criticize, give honest feedback even if it is harsh. But what pointed out is based on a few stories where these boundaries were transgressed understand on one hand, seniors should be thoughtful and considerate towards juniors, on the other hand juniors should be resilient enough and should not take every criticism to heart. Oded, thank you for spending so much time in community service. Hope these discussions help all of us to have better behaviors. My heart goes out to the victims, to Yuval, to Oded, Irit, Ehud, Lior. Let there be understanding and empathy. in our heart am sorry if hurt you or Lior. Reply You did not hurt me at all took offense at none of the reactions read here, but did not read all only read those who 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 35/82 December 2, 2018 at 12:15 pm Anonymous December 2, 2018 at 2:54 pm Take Legal Action replied to my own comments, since felt obliged to do so. In general have principled as well as practical reservations regarding participating in blog discussions. But once I\u2019m forced to place a comment feel obliged to answer candid responses. Reply Thank you for posting this. As someone who also had some unpleasant interactions with as a female graduate student a decade ago, and as someone who watched him invited a female undergraduate to his hotel room have to say appreciate this being posted on a public blog. This may have been an open secret, but it certainly wasn\u2019t known to me or my friends at the time, and wish it had been Googled \u201cYuval Peres sexual harassment\u201d only a few months ago. I\u2019ve always wondered what lines, exactly, he\u2019s crossed in his career have to confess that I\u2019m bothered that even after all this publicity still do not know. It\u2019s all very hush-hush: the \u201cbig cases\u201d were apparently settled behind closed doors. Until this blog post never even knew (although certainly surmised) that other people had had the same experience don\u2019t know what the right answer here is, and don\u2019t like online lynch mobs, but certainly in this case, the publicity is way overdue. Reply feel very bad for all of the women who have been negatively affected by Yuval (ranging from a single bad experience to possibly ruining their academic careers have been thinking about this for a while, and cannot understand/rationalize why Microsoft did not fire Yuval already after the first incident was reported, nor at any point in time over the last ten years. My understanding is that multiple women have reported their negative encounters (unwanted advances/sexual harassment) with Yuval to Microsoft and to the University of Washington over the last ten years. My understanding is that has reacted very quickly, and cut their ties to MSR, but Microsoft is still employing Yuval to this day. How can the and legal departments from Microsoft justify this? You have credible reports that a person has repeatedly made unwanted sexual advances to young women (possibly sexually harassed them \u2013 although am not a lawyer), possibly shown the behavior of a sexual predator (although am not a lawyer), and he does not stop this behavior after he is told do so, and still, he is employed by Microsoft to this day believe that Microsoft is liable for employing such a person, and creating a work environment where such a person interacts with young women, in particular after Microsoft has been notified multiple times about his behavior? Think about all the female 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 36/82 December 2, 2018 at 3:52 pm Take Legal Action December 2, 2018 at 7:20 pm Anonymous December 2, 2018 at 4:11 pm Anon December 4, 2018 at 9:55 pm Anonymous employees, PhD students, interns, visitors, etc. that were at and have interacted with Yuval after Microsoft already knew about Yuvals previous behvior. Microsoft has \u201cendangered\u201d all of them think, all of the women who have been negatively affected by Yuval (while at Microsoft) can sue Yuval personally and Microsoft as a company, and they would have a pretty strong case, given that it now seems clear there was not just a single incidence, but multiple cases that have been reported to Microsoft. Of course understand if some or all of them women do not want to come forward and/or go through such a legal process. Reply PS: To clarify, by \u201csuing Microsoft mean \u201csuing for compensatory and punitive damages\u201d on the order of hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars\u2026 Reply agree and think there should be a formal inquiry into all the organizations and people that protected a known sexual predator whose results are made public. This reminds me of the case if Larry Nassar who was protected by officials presumably because he was a big deal. Reply It doesn\u2019t do you credit to speculate like this\u2026 Reply Speculation is only occurring because the corporations, institutes as well as the authors of the email presenting themselves as defender of the victims have decided that public is too naive to know all the details and those details must be kept within the circle of few people that they feel wise and of higher intellect to handle it \u201ccorrectly\u201d. This has been cause in virtually every sexual harasser being let go with slap on the hand and run his operations for decades. It is sad to see this being continued here in exact similar vein while authors of the email spin this as some sort of moral obligations for themselves to continue this old ritual without justification or clear reasoning beyond invoking trivial legalities such as being copyright holder of the text. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 37/82 December 2, 2018 at 5:13 pm Lany December 2, 2018 at 7:33 pm Fire Yuval December 3, 2018 at 1:09 am Anima December 3, 2018 at 3:08 am Anon very tragic situation, most of all for the victims who lived through these experiences once and are now probably reliving them mentally again. Can someone with the knowledge of the details explain when the five additional cases mentioned in the original posting happened? Before or after was sanctioned by and UW? Reply have seen that bastard drool over young female researchers for sooo long. Despite appearing to be extremely sweet on the surface, he is a dick to you unless you are a female or a genius male. Knowing him for over a decade strongly believe that he will never change his behavior and will only refine his approaches in the future and might still get away very cleverly. The only solution to this is to get him fired from Microsoft. Maybe a bunch of us could contact Eric Horvitz about our experiences with Yuval or sign a collective petition to get Yuval fired. Its so strange that no strong action is being taken against him despite all the shit he does. Reply am so disappointed that most of the comments focus so heavily on pseudo intellectual debate on privacy and moral rights to reveal yuval peres as a sexual predator. Very few acknowledged the big stress have to undergo with these public statements (and a big thank you to ones who could emphasize with it am doing this on behalf of all the women what are unable to do so and we all deserve justice want to put an end to how he is abusing his position to prey on young women who have no idea didn\u2019t grow up in the theory community was an outsider who found interesting connections between statistical physics and machine learning, pretty much on my own was looking forward to discussing this with yuval had no freaking clue! No one warned me. He was free to visit all Microsoft labs and talk to Microsoft Faculty Fellows and other outsiders know have a better picture of the extent of abuse wish someone like Lior existed when was younger but better late than never! Reply Dear Anima, we are sorry for what happened to you and would like to ensure that women members in our 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 38/82 December 3, 2018 at 12:43 pm Nicolas Bray December 3, 2018 at 4:39 am Gabriel Nivasch community are protected. But there is reason why we are debating about privacy and moral rights to reveal yuval in public think Oded-Irit-Ehud\u2019s action was reasonable and as a natural next step one could forward the email to all women members in the community. With workshops like women in theory, women in probability, women in ML, we can easily create such mailing lists and start a whisper campaign against the persons who cross ethical lines. We can also give them warnings through their friends and employers. We can keep watch on their behaviors. If these actions does not stop their misconducts, we can go for stricter actions. What we do not want is to do justice in a way that is similar to mob lynching. Everyone deserves to present their side of the story. Yuval is surely not the most evil, mysoginistic, predator guy out there. So it is natural to give him another chance to rectify his mistakes and to say sorry. Killing a criminal would surely stop the crimes he would do in future, but is it the right way to deal with criminals and crimes? Reply One thing you\u2019ll notice about this \u201clynch mob\u201d situation is that Yuval Peres is very, very much still alive. I\u2019d suggest that you go google image search the words \u201clynch mob\u201d and consider how those people might have felt about their brutal, horrific deaths being compared to someone having unpleasant but true things said about them. And then feel very bad about yourself, as you should. Dear Anima, First, let me offer my sympathies to you. The sexual harassment that you, as well as the other women, underwent, was wrong. Sexual harassment can cause women to abandon the community. Hence, it can also hurt the community itself. We have a moral obligation to stand up against it. I\u2019m sure the overwhelming majority of the \u201csilent readers\u201d of this post agree with the above, and feel similar sympathies for the affected women, even if they didn\u2019t publicly express them. Now, regarding the other topic of discussion here in the comments. The discussion was whether the letter written by Friedgut et al should have been made public or not. Two of the letter\u2019s authors are unhappy that Lior made the letter public. (Strangely, they tried to make the letter sort-of half- public, without realizing that that had a very slim chance of working.) 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 39/82 December 3, 2018 at 8:00 am Anonymous December 3, 2018 at 2:33 am eventhisoneistaken December 3, 2018 at 4:04 am Anon2 My personal opinion is that, after having unsuccessfully tried other things, and after carefully checking all the facts, going public was the right thing. It was important. But nevertheless, even if the authors are now angry at Lior for making the letter public without their consent, they still were the ones who wrote the letter. And they did it in order to stand up for you and the other harassment victims. Reply Yeah, no one warned me, either, and was definitely in the same community as Yuval! People watched really sketchy interactions involving myself and my friends, and no one ever said anything. Thank you for signing your name. I\u2019m not part of these communities anymore quit academia after my post doc) and I\u2019m a bit hesitant to do so, but perhaps should. Do you really think firing him is sufficient? What if he gets a job somewhere else? Reply It is natural to be empathetic to one\u2019s friend, even if he/she is accused. This is a natural human tendency, not a \u201cwhite powerful male only\u201d phenomenon. If you know about the Avital Ronell case (a feminist woman professor who is accused to sexually harass a male grad student), quite a few leading feminist women friends of her supported her. Similar thing happened with french me too movement. Some interesting things are coming out in this issue 1. Harasser often thinks he/she does not have evil intention. Proper counseling is needed here. 2. Only friends discussing the matter may not help. One may not take the friends seriously. The proper course of action should be of reprimanding through both friends and non-friend colleagues and employers. The idea of creating a list of potential harassers and mailing it through women-only /community specific lists seems to be reasonable. Public blogging and social media shaming should be the final step, not the knee jerk reaction step. This is not to protect the accused (every member including the accused deserves fair treatment) but to ensure that the atmosphere in the community does not become vitriolic due to other factors such as difference of opinions and ideologies, professional rivalry etc. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 40/82 December 3, 2018 at 6:39 am APostDoc December 3, 2018 at 8:37 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) December 4, 2018 at 10:16 pm Anonymous December 3, 2018 at 8:01 am Anonymous December 3, 2018 at 9:04 am Dana Moshkovitz It took thoudsands years of civilization to go from \u201cthe rule of the mob\u201d to \u201cthe rule of the law\u201d. As a kind, we have learnt through awfull examples, like McChartism and witch hunts, that the best way to trial and punish guilty people is through institutions of law, after a procedure that might be lenghty and feel cumbersome but preserves the rights of both accusers and the accused. Of all the people, it is pretty astonishing to see a university professor reverting back to public shaming and witch hunting as a way to achieve justice. But it is too risky to point out, so \u2018ll just join the crowd, and cheer, and watch it burn. Reply In case you did not notice, Lior\u2019s life mission is reverting to the rule of the mob. Sad, but there you have it. Reply No one is against \u201cfair trial\u201d clause. But for the fair trial to happen, the charges must be brought in public, trial must proceed in public and judgement must be handed out in public with appropriate sentencing or absolving of guilt to the accused. In this case, like many others, no details are being made public, no one knows what proofs or defences occurred and no one is certain what exact punishment was handed out to the accused, if any, by his employer. It is customary to keep some details of the case such as names of victims confidencial but here we are talking about secret court that places itself as higher above the public eye. The entire self- appointed judge and jury system has apparently decided it needs to execute such that public is deliberately kept unaware with any of the accusations as well as outcomes of the proceedings. Reply Whoops. That last comment was supposed to go on here. Reply Back in 2007, while was a PhD student at Weizmann, Yuval Peres asked to meet me to discuss my post-doc. Microsoft Research was one of the top places for post-docs in theoretical computer science, so met him. He showed me a presentation of his research, discussed problems he was thinking about, and talked about Microsoft Research. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 41/82 Then he offered me wine refused), tried to sit too close to me kept my distance) and grabbed my hand, twice said was uninterested and pulled my hand back couldn\u2019t believe this was happening left immediately. Later reported the incident to relevant people at Microsoft. Several months later learned that Yuval Peres became the head of Microsoft\u2019s theory group in Redmond. Seeing Yuval\u2019s behavior suspected that the incident with me was part of a larger pattern of behavior of his. When was a post-doc at Princeton in 2009 wrote a public essay describing what happened and urged the relevant people to take action didn\u2019t mention Yuval by name because didn\u2019t want to hurt his family, but did disclose his name to leaders of our research community. When was an assistant professor at learned of two other cases of harassment by Yuval, before and after mine. The one that happened a few years after mine was particularly painful to me, because it felt preventable, and because it caused a lot of direct damage to the young student involved suspected that there were other incidents, but didn\u2019t know for sure until received the email from Ehud Friedgut, Irit Dinur and Oded Goldreich last week. I\u2019m relieved that the information is now public, and hope that it will prevent future incidents. ======= This is the public essay wrote in 2009: My Personal Experience with Sexual Harassment In 2004 was 21 and in my first year of PhD, still at Tel-Aviv University. My advisor at the time sent me to the for a month-and-half \u201ctour\u201d. It was quite an experience for me. It influenced my life in many ways did not expect. Some of those ways were quite unfortunate was too young, and it was very premature met many new people on this trip. Some of them were very nice to me stayed in people\u2019s homes and got invited to dinners, parties and hikes. Three years later, in 2007 got an email from one of the people that met during the 2004 trip. In 2007 was a year away from finishing my PhD at the Weizmann Institute, and that person wanted to meet me regarding my post- doc. That person was a professor who was very nice to me back in 2004. In the few days that spent where he was, he invited me to dinner with his family, asked me to join him and his colleagues on some near-by hike, explained mathematical stuff to me, introduced me to people, and so on had no connection with him since 2004. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 42/82 Following his email in 2007 met this man at some coffee shop near his parents\u2019 house. He had arrived from the just a few hours earlier. He had some presentation of his research that he showed me and he talked to me about the place he was at and the people there. At some point he said that the coffee shop was too loud, and asked me if it would be ok to continue our conversation in his family\u2019s house agreed was at his house in the met his family]. When we got to the house, things started to become weird. He suggested a glass of wine told him never drink. He suggested \u201cjust epsilon refused sat on the sofa, because thought he would sit on the armchair. He came to sit on the sofa next to me sat as far as could, on the very edge of the sofa was unsure what was going on. He continued to show me the presentation, and that was ok. Then he started talking about 2004, telling me how much impressed him. He grabbed my hand took away my hand, telling him that did not want that think that was shivering and my voice trembled as well. At that point it was already clear what was going on, and just could not believe it was actually happening. He grabbed my hand for the second time, telling me that it was \u201cok\u201d. It was not, but it was sort of weird, because it felt just like my father\u2019s hand took my hand away again looked at my watch and told him, in what thought to be a somewhat theatrical gesture; that it was too late and had to go, and went out of there as fast as could. My car was parked right next to his house, and walked fast. He followed me outside, and then he stopped. He told me that he was sorry, he misinterpreted my behavior was quite stunned by this last remark. That man had invited me to a \u201cjob interview\u201d. He had pretended it was a job interview for almost the entire meeting acted like a person in a job interview, which thought was, until realized otherwise. This must have misinterpreted your behavior\u201d is outrageous. [And it is a bad clich\u00e9.] Each and every instinct had told me to ignore this remark and just get away from there as fast as could. But it was outside, and was next to my car with my keys in my hand, so figured he would not be able to harm me. So asked him what exactly he could misinterpret in my behavior. He told me that nothing; that it was something in 2004. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 43/82 This only added to my astonishment. There could not have been anything to misinterpret in 2004, because could never think of that man (married, father to children, twice my age, professor) in a romantic sense. More than that, the very thought that someone could attribute such intents to my 21 year old self simply frightened me. It was quite a trauma for me, because this experience shook my very foundations: it undermined my trust in people. Fortunately for me, my family and friends reacted very well, and that helped preventing any poisonous thoughts that could have arose. But this experience was interesting. It made me understand, immediately, what most people never understand: that sexual harassment is not about sex, and it is not about love. Sexual harassment is about hunting down. And both parties obey the rules of hunt felt trapped was terrified and ran away. He had the patience and the sensitivity of a hunter. It was not the sensitivity of a lover, by the way. The difference is that a lover cares. What are even more interesting than the general principle are the specifics of this concrete case: the man, and me, and the circumstances that led to this evening. Mostly do not know, and would not speculate. What is clear is that the man did a fundamental mistake: he had some impression of me, and he mistaken it with my-real-flash-and-blood-self would expect a person with several tens of years of life experience not to make such harmful \u201cmistakes\u201d. But he did, and got hurt, and had to decide how wanted to handle this. The first thing did when got home was to tell my family and my advisor. But then the question was what wanted to do next. First, there is the legal aspect. As far as understand, and do not have any sort of legal education, what that man did is against the Israeli law. The relevant law is called \u201cthe law for equality of opportunities in work\u201d from 1988, with corrections from 1995 and 1998. The law references \u201cthe law for prevention of sexual harassment\u201d from 1998. The law forbids a job giver, someone acting on behalf of the job giver, or any other employee, to perform \u201csexual harassment\u201d in a person seeking a job. \u201cSexual harassment\u201d is any one of several acts. One of these acts is making offers of a sexual nature when the person in question showed that he/she is not interested in such offers advise those that are interested to look up these laws and read them, as well as the legal work that was done around them. It is very interesting. There is also the ethical aspect. Institutes, universities and large corporations usually have detailed ethic codes that address sexual harassment. While did not check the ethics code of the particular place that man was at assume that his actions violate this code as well. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 44/82 strongly felt that this man should face what he did. This is morally true and this is simple common-sense. However did not feel that should be the one directly confronting that man, nor was interested in such a role. What decided to do was to write what happened to the people who were in the appropriate position at the place where this man was thought that they were the best people to handle this, both because of their position and because of their long acquaintance with the man also had some presumption about these people thought that they were \u201cgood people\u201d. So asked for their intervention decided not to file charges against that man, because felt that this situation can still be judged in the realm of relationships between people and ethics, rather than that of law also wanted to avoid any sort of fuss around this, for my sake. Shortly after sent the email to those people, they sent me a brief response which liked. It said that they were very concerned about what happened and they were looking into it. The email ended with \u201ctake care found this response human and sensitive, as well as practical and to the point, and was glad that decided to handle things the way did never heard from those people again few months later learned that the man was \u201cpromoted\u201d to an influential position. In retrospect guess that everyone, but me, already knew about this \u201cpromotion\u201d at the time that everything happened find it extremely strange, though, that it did not truly alert anyone that one of the first things that that man did with the power that was placed in his hands was what he did that evening in Israel had no connection with that man or with those people since 2007. In the two years that passed since happened to see the man, unexpectedly and from distance, two or three times. Why do write this essay now? Because can. There was some prosaic trigger: someone said to me \u2013 in a completely neutral setting \u2013 this awful word \u201cepsilon\u201d [it\u2019s awful only when used to neglect something that is non negligible], for the second time in my life, and almost choked was amazed that almost choked, that it still bears such influence on me. But the deeper reason is that now is the first time that can write this text in this form. It took time, it took a change of scenery, and it took independence already had all the ideas that appear in this text a few days after this whole thing happened. But could never write this text in this form then; just like probably would not have written this text in this form if had written it in a later point of my life. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 45/82 dedicated a lot of thought to what would be the \u201cright\u201d way to handle this do not know whether this text is this \u201cright\u201d way, but do not know what else can do believe that exhausted the direct ways to handle this. And believe that it should be handled, and it should be handled properly. What is \u201cProper Handling\u201d? In my opinion, any sort of \u201cproper handling\u201d must consist of: (1) Acknowledgement: Acknowledgment of my position and my viewpoint as reflected in this essay, and \u2014 much more importantly \u2014 acceptance of the probable truth of this essay made efforts to tell the story exactly the way it happened. Some people, like my parents, who witnessed me coming back home upset and distracted after this happened, or my advisor to whom sent an email right away and who had a long conversation with me on the phone about the incident, have no problem accepting what told them as truth. They saw the immediate outcome, and they know me very closely and are very well aware of my reliability. For other people, especially people who do not know me, accepting this essay might be difficult. From those people only hope for kindness and good judgment. (2) Reaction: When wrote this essay decided that was willing to risk my privacy if can use my case to help myself and others figured out that what happened already had some unfortunate practical implications on my life, as tried to keep my distance both from the man and from the people who chose not to handle the incident properly missed lectures that wanted to hear (when that man was the speaker), turned down invitations to give talks did not want to be that man\u2019s guest again did not apply to certain post-doc positions did not want that man or those people to be my bosses). Basically, what happened was that was forced into this traumatic, undesirable incident. Then, instead of this matter being handled immediately, letting me move on with my life had to move on with my life knowing that have to be careful of certain people. That\u2019s no way to live. And expect that living like this in the future will lead to even more undesired practical implications on my life. That\u2019s unfortunate care a lot about my life think that some action must be taken. What happened indicates a severe ethical failure of a person who is in an influential position. It indicates bad judgment, and it indicates abuse of power. This sort of things is dangerous, and do not think that we should underestimate them do not think that we should overestimate them either do not know whether this man had ever done something like this before, whether he thought of doing something like this before, or what happened to his \u201cthought process\u201d following this incident. All know is what happened in 2007. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 46/82 think that the people in the appropriate position should react exactly to what happened, and do so effectively. And any sort of reaction must take appropriate measures against something like this ever happening again. In addition think that we, as a community, must do something in the broader sense (more on this is in the \u201creflections\u201d section below). Some Reflections was \u201csexually harassed\u201d. \u201cIt happened to me.\u201d Of course, to use this term \u201csexual harassment\u201d and say that \u201cit happened to me\u201d is artificial. There was never an \u201cit\u201d that happened to me. There was just one man who did something that he should not have done. But think that there is an \u201cit\u201d such as \u201csexual harassment think so because felt it, strongly experienced \u201csexual harassment also think that there is an \u201cit\u201d as \u201csexual harassment\u201d because there should be an \u201cit\u201d here. This is something that we, mathematicians, do: we invent imaginary concepts if they help us explain the world better think that there is \u201csexual harassment\u201d because the horrifying feeling that you walked right into a dangerous \u201ctrap\u201d, is something that is not captured by the definition of \u201ccourtship\u201d, because the feeling that someone misused the trust that you put in him/her because of his/her position, is not part of normal relationships between a young person and an older, influential person think that it is a good mental exercise to try putting yourself in the shoes of someone who experiences sexual harassment, to try to understand. Of course, if you did not experience something, even if you try real hard to imagine how it is like, you are bound to miss the most trivial things. But still think that this is an important exercise also recommend the following intellectual exercises: What would you do if your child/close-family-member-you-feel- responsibility-to/ told you something like what wrote? What would you do if your student told you something like this? Your friend? What would you do instead of those people who got the letter from me in 2007? What do you do as a bystander? First of all, it is my strong conviction that each and every one of us, male or female, and all of us as a community, has to understand sexual harassment. In particular, we have to understand sexual harassment in academia. Keep in mind that academia is based on strong authority/mentorship relations (e.g. professor-student) among people who are [typically] adults [though usually there is a significant age difference]. Like with every concept we encounter, we should look at \u201csexual harassment\u201d, we should wonder what it means, [and in this case, since we are talking about an inherently-social problem] we should talk about it. And we should root it out. We must. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 47/82 December 3, 2018 at 12:49 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 4:34 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 9:38 am a theorist It should have been clear to this man that he should not do what he did, and it should have been clear to him, even if he lacked the wisdom to understand it by himself. It would have been clear to him if this was the \u201cstatus quo\u201d, if this was \u201ccommon knowledge thought that it was, and think that it is for most of the people that know. But what this evening, and the conversations that had with people because of it, taught me, is that it is not sufficiently clear. It is not sufficiently clear even to highly intelligent people, and even to people that care a lot about their opinion. And it could have been clearer to almost all the people know. Reply Dana am so sorry that you have also been harassed by Yuval cannot begin to imagine how this must have felt at the time, and what you went through! Also: thank you also for your courage to share your story publicly. This will help other women, and it helps bolster the case against Yuval and Microsoft. What is interesting to me, is that not only is there a pattern of bad behavior on Yuval\u2019s side over many (10+) years \u2013 but also on Microsoft\u2019s side. If understand this correctly, there have been multiple incidents, now at least going back to 2007, where Microsoft has been alerted about an incident, and decided not to take action against Yuval. And in some cases they did not even get back to the women, perhaps hoping that they would give up by themselves. Given the size of the Microsoft Corporation, this is truly unfathomable (but guess not unheard of). Reply Dana,I\u2019m sorry about your experience and thank you for your essay. This is one of the most insightful have read about this issue, and really gives a powerful perspective about the importance and magnitude of this problem in our community hope we can move quickly toward a fair, just, and empathetic solution. Reply Thank you for writing this, Dana. Thanks also to Anima. And thanks to Irit, Ehud, and Oded. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 48/82 December 3, 2018 at 11:30 am Ehud Friedgut December 4, 2018 at 8:16 am Anon December 3, 2018 at 2:12 pm Marnie Dunsmore Dana, thanks very much for your courage to tell your story in public! If had to put an example in a textbook on this topic, an example that exemplifies the total imbalance in power between the parties involved, this would be it. When is a person more vulnerable than when their job application is being considered? And how obtuse and indecent does one have to be to make a pass at someone who is at their mercy (professionally) at that point? Kudos to you for getting up and leaving immediately, and for reporting it to his boss. To this day am bewildered that he wasn\u2019t fired for this. In retrospect, that would probably have been a much better outcome for him than the path he\u2019s currently walking down. Reply Dana think that you are a brave woman and that you did exactly the right thing in all respects! You are not a prophet and shouldn\u2019t chastise yourself for not doing more at the time. Ehud respect you but think that you let the cat out of the box. The whole purpose of the public letter (as you halfheartedly admit) was to expedite the sacking of Yuval. It may be a legitimate cause under the circumstances (I\u2019m not in a position to make a judgement) but you guys should be ready to admit that openly. Oded (and Ehud): I\u2019m unimpressed from you failing to realize the inevitable effect of sending a mass email on such a sensitive topic. Every 10 year old girl understands it. Are you playing dumb or what? N.B. I\u2019m not in the CS/probability community and wasn\u2019t exposed to this filth until recently Reply \u201cTo this day am bewildered that he wasn\u2019t fired for this.\u201d Really? Lawsuit claims sexual harassment rife in Microsoft\u2019s \u2018boys\u2019 club atmosphere\u2019 harassment-lawsuit-lacklustre-response 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 49/82 December 3, 2018 at 2:59 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 3:12 pm For the men who don't work with women December 3, 2018 at 8:36 pm Anonymous December 3, 2018 at 10:27 pm Anon Reply Wow did not know about this lawsuit (even though, if had seen the headline would have read the article). This is horrifying\u2026 Reply If more men worked with women, if women felt that they were treated with respect, taken seriously, and that they had no problem working with people, then they would not be so afraid to say no to a dinner or swimming or whatever invitation (not that inappropriate invitations should be issued). The problem is that many men don\u2019t work with women, or they work with them on paper but in practice treat them worse than their male mentees/collaborators can think of plenty of examples at both universities and at Microsoft. Just take a look at the group that Yuval is part of. There is not even one woman there and some of the researchers in that group don\u2019t have even a single paper co-authored with a woman (or very few). Why? These are not people that started publishing yesterday. Women are afraid because they feel isolated and the people who treat them like shit and ignore and dismiss them are just as much to blame for having created this environment. Reply I\u2019ve never had trouble being taken seriously, and certainly didn\u2019t accept invitations to swimming or anything obviously inappropriate. But there\u2019s often a power imbalance other than male/female. If you\u2019re invited to dinner by a really influential person in your area and there are going to be other professors there, should you go? Even if your previous experience leads you to suggest that the person inviting you might have something in mind that you might not? It\u2019s a hard balancing act. Reply Actually, the theory group at Microsoft was created thanks to Jennifer Chayes, who also led the group for many years before 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 50/82 December 3, 2018 at 8:47 pm Jennifer Chayes December 3, 2018 at 9:26 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 9:42 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 9:34 pm Anon moving to Boston. She is now the head of the Microsoft Research branches in Boston and Montreal. Reply In response to Dana Moshkovitz\u2019s post want you to know we at Microsoft take these situations very seriously. We investigated at the time and we imposed discipline. We don\u2019t comment publicly on confidential personnel matters, but do want to assure you that we take these matters very seriously and we discipline employees when appropriate. And we will continue to investigate when we hear of new concerns and will take action as needed. Reply Jennifer: Yuval had a large number of young female visitors, students, and subordinates over the years since disciplinary actions were taken by Microsoft and then by the University of Washington. Were those visitors given any warning? Was there another member of the Redmond theory group who was told of these events so they could take measures to prevent future abuses? Was there ongoing monitoring by Microsoft in any capacity? If the answer to those questions is no, and the behavior continued with other visitors and employees, do you think Microsoft should be held accountable for the lack of continued oversight apologize for commenting anonymously when you have done so publicly, and hope it\u2019s clear that am addressing the questions of culpability towards Microsoft (and you as their representative), and not toward you personally. Reply [ Despite the monicker \u201cAnon\u201d and the typographical and thematic similarity of the two comments want to make it clear that Anon 9:26pm (me) and Anon 9:34pm (someone else) were not coordinated in any way. ] Jennifer: thanks for commenting on this. However, given the personal stories on this board, and the accumulated evidence over the last 10 years, it sounds almost cynical when you write that \u201cMicrosoft takes these situations very seriously.\u201d For once, Dana wrote that \u201cshe never heard back from Microsoft!\u201d. Second, future visitors/interns/PhD 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 51/82 December 4, 2018 at 6:42 am An observer December 4, 2018 at 8:16 am Anonymous December 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm Anonymous December 4, 2018 at 10:49 pm Anonymous students/etc. were not warned about Yuval (as know personally), and have been harassed by him, even after Dana had reported her incident. So, it seems obvious that, even if Microsoft did something (but what was it, given that Yuval was the head of the Theory group for many years, and is still a Principal Scientist), it was not enough by a large margin\u2026 Reply think what Jennifer is saying in plain English is that Yuval is going to get the sack from Microsoft very soon (probably even before Mourinho). I\u2019m not saying this out of schadenfreude or with any sentiment. (I\u2019m merely a spectator of this ugly game.) It\u2019s just the only logical outcome. Reply As someone who visited Yuval at Microsoft Research after 2007 can confirm that no warning was given. None at all. We had no idea. Reply Dear Jennifer, It is sad to see your standard corporate response of \u201cwe will continue to investigate when we hear of new concerns and will take action as needed was disciplined and harassment had continued. He is disciplined again, so what\u2019s new would like to see dissolving this corporate policy of keeping harassment complaints secret. If an employee beats up a student on your campus and caused harm, you would report the incident to police. Why is it the case that you would keep everything secret when an employee causes much more longer term harm to a student? We expected better from you. Reply Very sad to see this passage in Dana\u2019s essay and does not align at all with Jennifer\u2019s statement: Shortly after sent the email to those people, they sent me a brief response which liked. It said that they were very concerned about what happened and they were looking into it. The email ended with \u201ctake care found this 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 52/82 December 11, 2018 at 1:41 pm Anon December 3, 2018 at 9:18 pm sanctimonious hypocrite December 3, 2018 at 9:26 pm Lior Pachter December 4, 2018 at 3:50 am Nicolas Bray response human and sensitive, as well as practical and to the point, and was glad that decided to handle things the way did never heard from those people again few months later learned that the man was \u201cpromoted\u201d to an influential position. In retrospect guess that everyone, but me, already knew about this \u201cpromotion\u201d at the time that everything happened. Reply One has to wonder if the time it took Microsoft to act was because knew something about senior management at MSR. It is time for to come clean on why it took this long, and carry out a public investigation on this topic. Reply also wonder when the leaders of the statistics department at Berkeley, where Peres used to work, and where Terry Speed was a professor emeritus before reported him, will end their culture of silence.\u201d Why don\u2019t you wonder that for your own department too? Peres and Speed\u2019s exploits are child\u2019s play compared to Professor Bonaparte\u2019s: Reply this story is about a professor at Berkeley am not employed there but when was did see this post and alerted a number of people to it and matters related to it. There are also a number of other problems in that department, e.g. Reply Hi sanctimonious hypocrite just wanted to say that always find it strange when people comment on these posts with their speculations about Lior\u2019s internal state rather than the actual issue at hand (sexual harassment, in case you forgot). Best, Nick 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 53/82 December 4, 2018 at 12:09 pm eventhisoneistaken December 4, 2018 at 1:06 am Jane December 4, 2018 at 8:20 am Anonymous December 4, 2018 at 11:05 am Anonymous December 5, 2018 at 12:36 am another female anon Reply How ironic, Nicolas Bray, that you call out others for mind-reading people\u2019s internal states, while that is precisely what you did to me (\u201cyou do not give a shit about harm to women\u201d). And you still haven\u2019t answered my question about what you find objectionable in defending wrongfully accused men. You\u2019re not obligated to respond, of course \u2014 but then again, I\u2019m not posting this for your benefit. It boggles my mind that after Dana\u2019s complaint he was still made the head of the theory group at Microsoft. There are not that many postdoc opportunities, and probably most young female theorists at some point went through an interview or at least a visit with his group. How many of them were subject to this kind of treatment we\u2019ll never know\u2026 Reply Or maybe, just maybe, the mission is to bring these long-hidden stories into the light. Let\u2019s stick to the specifics here: do you think this is a witch hunt? Is Yuval being unfairly targeted? In case you haven\u2019t noticed, many \u201cofficial\u201d channels were tried before making things public. Reply As a female grad student do not think this is a witch hunt have heard first- and second-hand stories from friends who trust. People have been dealing with this very carefully as it matters to their career and it is unfortunate that it affected their professional choices in different ways. Thank you Anima and Dana for sharing your stories in public feel sorry for what happened and you are both very brave in many ways. Thank you Irit, Ehud and Oded for the letter do not want to get into the debate on intellectual property but thank you for making this matter public, Lior. We appreciate for what all of you have done. Reply From the statements of people who claim to be harassed by YP, it is clear that, whatever actions were done by Microsoft and others behind the closed doors, they were insufficient because harassment 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 54/82 December 4, 2018 at 10:45 am Crypto Winter December 4, 2018 at 3:08 pm MadHatter December 4, 2018 at 11:00 pm Anonymous continued. So do think that in this particular case the email was justified. Also cannot speak for the authors of the email, but if were to send out such an email, it wouldn\u2019t be an easy decision to make: one has to choose between being potentially not fair to and potentially hurting more females think, given the circumstances, the authors made the right choice, and thank them for that. That said think it is our responsibility to view such an action as very extreme and not make it a standard \u201cway to go hope everyone agrees with me that, just like women deserve to live in a world where they don\u2019t worry about being harassed, men deserve to live in a world where they don\u2019t worry about being falsely accused of harassment. Part of that is to make sure that we have efficient administrative or legal process for these cases (so we don\u2019t have to resort to sending emails out of despair, and warning each other through a gossip network cannot believe that didn\u2019t do anything to at the very least make sure that would\u2019t talk to female colleagues in private one-to-one. And thanks to everyone who spoke out. As a person who was once touched in a non-sexual, but nevertheless very weird way \u2013 at a conference, by another female whom even didn\u2019t know can only imagine how bad Dana felt. It would be great if we all respect each other\u2019s boundaries, especially in a professional environment. Reply Jennifer Chayes: It seems to me essential to divulge more information publicly, if you want to make the claim that Microsoft takes these situations seriously and you impose discipline. The current public account is according to Dana, that she complained and Yuval was promoted to head of the theory group can see you not wanting to disclose confidential company information, but what you\u2019re saying seems to be contradicting to the current public facts. Reply From Dana\u2019s essay, It seems that he was already promoted before the incident. But Microsoft should be ashamed and held responsible for the fact that there were others who were later similarly harassed by the person, even after the details of Dana\u2019s case were known to them. Reply My read of Dana\u2019s essay is that was promoted several months after she had 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 55/82 December 5, 2018 at 3:00 am Lucas Gerin December 5, 2018 at 8:20 pm Jake December 6, 2018 at 8:57 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) December 6, 2018 at 9:39 am Carina December 6, 2018 at 10:47 am Boaz Barak filed the complaint. Also, she was never informed about the outcome of her complaint or that any action at all that was taken which is contrary to the \u201ccomfort email\u201d that she had received. The claim that some action had indeed been taken would remain forever in doubt unless this veil of corporate secrecy to protect offenders is destroyed. Dear Lior work in the field of Combinatorics & Probability would like to thank you for publishing this letter also support all the young women who have courageously witnessed. Reply have to admit I\u2019m a little surprised and disappointed that none of the other math and tcs blogs follow have been brave enough to talk about this at all. (Theory DIsh gets a pass due to Omer Reingold being the person who lit the spark here in the first place) Reply How does kicking someone qualify as bravery? Reply Talking about something openly, and risking the blowback, usually takes quite a bit of courage (whether or not you agree with the decision to do it can\u2019t speak for other theory blogs but will eventually post something about this, and reflection on sexual harassment in general, on the Windows on Theory blog am hoping to have a guest blog by someone more qualified than me (and in particular offered the original letter writers to post), but if don\u2019t find such a person will post something myself. It is not a trivial topic, and it is more important to get it right than to get it fast. (Also the fact that the blog aggregator is currently down might cause some theory blogs to wait with posting things in general, and about this in particular.) Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 56/82 December 8, 2018 at 1:40 pm Igor Rivin (@igriv) February 19, 2020 at 3:18 pm Random Guy June 5, 2020 at 7:26 am Another random guy praying for a postdoc, ergo the cowardice December 6, 2018 at 11:20 am Igor Rivin (@igriv) December 6, 2018 at 11:54 am Carina @Anonymous coward: You are missing the point completely. Dear Boaz: When really do you plan on posting? It\u2019s been over a year since your comment conjecture that none of the theory people will post anything concrete about Peres\u2019 actions simply because there is a sickening trait of diplomacy that runs through the community. @Random guy don\u2019t think it is diplomacy per se. It is self-servingness in the garb of diplomacy. Saying something concrete will inevitably burn bridges, and might cause them to miss out on a grant/collaboration/Nature paper. Even after being senior and \u201cuntouchable\u201d in terms of reputation, obviously your grant and induction onto Simons\u2019 board is more important than what a female researcher has to go through. The trick to wimp out of saying anything concrete is to use vapid self-effacing phrases like am not at all qualified to comment on this\u201d. You don\u2019t need to read research on sexual harassment to say that it is scarily atrocious that that Yuval wasn\u2019t fired long ago, after what seem like multiple complaints. Clearly, someone at Microsoft decided to retain him because his worth as a researcher meant more to them than the harm that was being caused by him to innocent women don\u2019t see any other plausible explanation. Furthermore, I\u2019d add that people need to call out the kind of response that Jennifer Chayes gave, and insist that a clear detailed account be given about why Yuval wasn\u2019t fired after multiple complaints. More importantly, who made the decision to not fire after, say, three complaints? To me, that person is the biggest problem in all this. @Carina Blowback? This is an echo chamber, where everyone is kicking the guy when he is down. Pathetic. Reply Igor: You, and several others, have been openly critical of Lior\u2019s decision to post this. So yes, there has been blowback. Surely Lior anticipated this, but chose to post it anyway. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 57/82 December 8, 2018 at 12:24 am Anonymous December 6, 2018 at 1:36 pm eventhisoneistaken December 6, 2018 at 3:37 pm Carina December 6, 2018 at 3:46 pm eventhisoneistaken December 6, 2018 at 6:33 pm Anonymous December 8, 2018 at 2:07 am [email protected] December 8, 2018 at 5:22 pm Anonymous December 9, 2018 at 11:28 am Anon1984 At the same time you are not very concerned about having taken advantage of scientists with less power than him and having systematically harassed people. Apparently molesting someone when they are down is not on equal footing with kicking them when they are down. @carina Oh yeah, I\u2019m sure Lior hesitated a thousand times before posting this: Will Igor Rivin get me fired from my job? Block my grants/reject my papers?.. Reply Surely not, and he can safely assume that no one will pretend their job is at risk as a result of his criticisms. Reply Well, not quite. That\u2019s only true if you espouse the right-thinking opinions. I, for example, have good reasons for maintaining my anonymity. And of course, Yuval\u2019s job is very much put at risk as a result of this post. As it should have been at least ten years ago is no longer at MSR. Reply want to thank Irit Dinur, Ehud Friedgut, Oded Goldreich, and Lior Pachter for making this issue public. Although have known Yuval for several years and admire his research was blissfully unaware of this disgusting behavior am sorry to everyone who was victims of this behavior hope that this teaches others to not abuse their power, and also that Yuval faces the consequences for his actions. Reply would think that this community, above all, would recognize that 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 58/82 December 9, 2018 at 12:07 pm Lior Pachter December 9, 2018 at 12:47 pm Anonymous December 9, 2018 at 1:33 pm Marnie Dunsmore distances and relations between points in high dimensional spaces are often measured and compared with rather arbitrary metrics. The unwritten \u201cethical rule\u201d that someone in a position of power shouldn\u2019t hit on someone with less power is ridiculous is not a particularly attractive guy, while the girls were no doubt much better looking feel really sorry for the ugly ones (in the most general sense). While walking around with your fly open reflects badly, there is nobody that needs to be \u201cprotected\u201d unless it gets to the point that actual written law has been broken. The career of a brilliant scientist has just been destroyed because someone didn\u2019t have thick enough skin to deal with an offer to go swimming. There have been so many others (Walter Lewin comes to mind hope your contributions to science make up for YPs. +1 for Trump. Reply If you don\u2019t have a thick enough skin to comment in your name then perhaps you are not in the best position to opine on how thick the skin of others ought to be. Reply What does any of this have to do with how good looking is am bewildered by your \u201clogic\u201d. It\u2019s ok for him to hit on women whose careers he can influence because he\u2019s not, in your view, good looking? Seriously, wtf? You also conveniently do not acknowledge that according to Dana\u2019s account, he touched her without her consent. In fact, after she had explicitly indicated she was not interested in his overtures. Reply don\u2019t know what Yuval Peres did or didn\u2019t do, but it is problematic when someone crosses boundaries in what is obviously understood to be a business or academic discussion do feel sad for Yuval, Walter Lewin, Sergio Verdu and many of the other men who have developed a pattern of pursuing sexual relationships in inappropriate work and professional contexts started my career in Canada where there is no title IX, so tend to frame these problems in a more general context than the definitions of title IX. The problem in these cases, is that this happens all the time for women in science, engineering, and computer science. If there is direct or even indirect supervision authority of the person crossing a professional boundary (not necessarily sexual), the junior person is then left with a double bind. They can speak up and say they think the behavior is inappropriate, or they can simply play along. It is much easier to play along than to speak up. And 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 59/82 December 9, 2018 at 1:42 pm Carina December 9, 2018 at 12:51 pm Anonymous unfortunately, even in minor situations like asking a person to not repeatedly over talk or dismiss a woman\u2019s technical inputs, any feedback that a more respectful behavior is needed is frequently met with hostility and reprisal. In an academic setting, the reprisal doesn\u2019t even have to be obvious. Just withholding or downgrading someone on a letter of reference can have a devastating effect on the career of a junior person. Over the long run, for women, the withholding of professional support and in its place, expecting subordination, complicity (sexual and otherwise), and \u201cwork wifing\u201d, is to destroy the advancement of women in computer science and electrical engineering. Unfortunately, Anon1984, I\u2019ve run into versions of you almost every week during my career. It is emotionally and professionally crippling to work with you. Regarding Walter Lewin: my husband, an PhD, was a great admirer of Walter. But upon reading the reported facts of the case, he could not but conclude that made a very difficult but necessary decision. Walter\u2019s behavior was repeated, calculated, meant to subjugate, and intentional. To justify his behavior is to declare that women are not worthy of respect and equal, professional treatment in an academic setting (or otherwise). The recent report certainly describes how pervasive sexual harassment, gender harassment and gender bias are in academic fields. And it also describes how much in denial a large number of people are regarding this issue. So, Anon1984, I\u2019m not surprised by your remark see this attitude all the time. But don\u2019t expect the culture of silence that you have benefitted from for the last century, to continue. Reply have heard a lot of people express the view that women, particularly young women with nascent careers, need to have thicker skin. At the same time, it seems that senior men with well-established careers need to be treated with great care, like a Faberg\u00e9 egg don\u2019t understand this \u2013 can someone explain? Reply Perhaps the contributions of the many women who will chose to pursue scientific careers because they will be less likely to face harrassment and coercion make up for the contributions of the \u201cbrilliant\u201d YP. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 60/82 December 9, 2018 at 9:18 pm Anon1984 December 9, 2018 at 11:19 pm Marnie Dunsmore Reply Carina, Faberege eggs and prolific scientists are rare. Just because someone studies math, it doesn\u2019t mean they will become an Einstein or Noether. Just because someone is \u201ccreepy\u201d should their career be ruined? If Turing endearingly asked me out for a date should fall to pieces and give up math? Who knows, maybe would like it. If, as an adult can\u2019t make that decision for myself then I\u2019ve got other problems don\u2019t understand why it\u2019s contradictory to have an intimate mathematical discussion and then switch gears to test the waters for physical intimacy. If the person says no, fine. From the accounts above it doesn\u2019t sound like went much beyond an inquiry. Perhaps he had dual motives and hopes in arranging the meeting to discuss both math and physical intimacy \u2013 so what? He touched someone\u2019s hand \u2013 the horror! What if he were an unmarried, good looking guy \u2013 would all women in math be off limits for him? Did he explicitly threaten to ruin someone\u2019s career if they didn\u2019t sleep with him think the \u201cvictims\u201d here are going too far. My points regarding attractiveness/ugliness (or powerful/weak) are 1) that no one would ever be able to ask the weakest person in the room out on a date and 2) the metric used to compare relative strength is not adequately defined. Lior, you are right fear the repercussions of using my real name. Does that mean am being harassed? As a male who is not particularly assertive am continually subject to the same oppressive forces that Marnie talks about. They are not unique to women. Sometimes am not the smartest person in the room, so in all likelihood maybe really should do more listening than talking. If you want to work with a dominant person you had either be dominant yourself or learn how to leverage the submissive role. Dominance hierarchies are very common in nature and evolve for a reason. We are not all Einsteins. We need to teach both women and men how to say no and assertively express their boundaries. There is no such thing as the utopic \u201csafe zone don\u2019t support career limiting harassment, but at the same time think we should all be a bit less prudish. Didn\u2019t your parents teach you to always look both ways before crossing the street? Oh my God, a car came by! Reply @Anon1984 \u201cAs a male who is not particularly assertive am continually subject to the same oppressive forces that Marnie talks about. They are not unique to women.\u201d That\u2019s true, Anon1984, but according to a recent Pew Center Study on discrimination in fields, women experience: 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 61/82 December 10, 2018 at 11:01 am Carina December 10, 2018 at 5:30 pm Jonathan Cohen -pay discrimination at five times the rate of men, -gender bias at four times that of men, -slights and marginalizing behaviors at three times that of men -passed over for promotion at twice the rate of men comes-in-many-forms-for-todays-working-women/ Reply @Anon1984: First of all want to thank you for answering my question appreciate it, and found your answer quite interesting think there is a great deal of empathy out there for someone like YP; and, in general think that\u2019s a good thing. But don\u2019t believe this is incompatible with also having a good deal of empathy for a junior researcher, especially if she\u2019s a student or postdoc who has not yet achieved any measure of job security (let alone had the chance to show the world how much she can contribute bad experience for someone at an early stage can be career- altering, especially if it happens during an interview. If talent is indeed rare, shouldn\u2019t we as a community be extra careful not to lose it in our younger generations? On the other hand, if you feel someone is at risk of losing his/her job unfairly, then your issue should really be with the employer. It\u2019s the employer who actually has the power to make that decision. To suggest that a young woman should suck it up and stay quiet (isn\u2019t that what it means to have \u201cthick skin\u201d?) because you are worried that someone in a position of power may actually listen to her is think, misguided. The people responsible for decisions are the people who make them. We should all be allowed to share our personal experiences and opinions without being accused of putting someone else\u2019s job at risk. Reply I\u2019m surprised nobody has pointed out the obvious flaw in Anon1984\u2019s reasoning. If person has an influence over person B\u2019s career and person makes a sexual advance on person B, then person fears that saying \u201cno\u201d will harm their career. This is a perfectly reasonable fear. First of all, person has no idea whether person will harm their career if they say \u201cno\u201d. Second, even assuming person has no bad intentions, just by basic human nature (as you seem to be interested in), it is quite common for person to end up with a more negative view of person B, which will at least subconsciously harm person B\u2019s future career. Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 62/82 December 13, 2018 at 6:26 am Jake December 10, 2018 at 2:23 am Oded Goldreich I\u2019m also a male who is not particularly assertive but I\u2019m also someone who pays attention and knows that am absolutely not \u201csubject to the same oppressive forces\u201d. (And not only did my parents \u201cteach (me) to always look both ways before crossing the street\u201d they also taught me \u201cit\u2019s your responsibility not to hit pedestrians when you\u2019re driving\u201d) Reply refrained from responding for the last week or so after was told that my responses contribute to the visibility of this post, whereas (as might have hinted in my past responses have principled reservations re the first posting on this thread as well as regarding blogs in general. But feel a duty to respond to the last post of Aron1984, which well articulated his position while basing it on two common but fundamentally flawed myths. So allow myself to violate for a moment my own principles (as did already in the past\u2026) and respond. The first myth that underlies Aron1984\u2019s position is the myth of the race of geniuses (or Ubermenschen). According to this myth, great progress in the various spheres of culture is the work of geniuses that are fundamentally different from ordinary humans (or even ordinary actors in the field careful version of this myth will admit that these geniuses are only revealed by their act of genius, but insist that all/most significant/fundamental discoveries (let alone \u201crevolutions\u201d and \u201cparadigm shifts\u201d) were performed by such geniuses, who are therefore our only/best hope for the next such breakthroughs believe that it will be easy to disprove the very last assertion (i.e., that next breakthrough is due to an old \u201cgenius\u201d) by an empirical study, although it may be the case that identified geniuses contribute more than the other best actors in the field (and much of this has to be attributed to the resources that these identified geniuses receive like higher level of job security, becoming a center of flocking, etc). Furthermore think the differences between the \u201cmatrix of abilities\u201d of different experts in the field is far smaller than normally conceived. In particular, the difference between ability to understand a breakthrough (done by others) and the inability (of a non-expert) to follow it is much larger. Hence, putting aside for a moment the moral perspective, I\u2019m not sure that the elimination of an identified genius is more harmful to the field than the elimination of ten other researchers (which may have a similar chance to make the next breakthrough). 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 63/82 December 11, 2018 at 5:24 am Anon The second myth is that we live in a gender-blind society in which the position of females (in various circumstances) can be analyzed exactly as the position of males (or be reduced to it). Believing this myth requires an extraordinary level of social blindness: not seeing the difference in socialization from age zero (till death) in the society at large, and ditto regarding the \u201cimplicit biases prefer the term unconscious biases) that play a role also in our research communities (and even within progressive males and females). More generally, assuming that all humans have a similar emotional structure and therefore can act similarly in similar circumstances (i.e., if can just say then so can all) is also a mistake. The differences between emotional structure is huge, and so if you want to know what is reasonable to expect 9as an emotional reaction to X), then you better poll a few humans (and try to have a diverse poll\u2026) rather than just infer from yourself. Reply It is unsettling to see mild responses to @Aron1984\u2019s absurd assertions. Acoording to @Aron1984, it should be perfectly acceptable that a person in position of career impacting power actively \u201cinvestigates\u201d the possibilities of sexual favors with sub-ordinates. In the world according to @Aron1984, no one should object if a faculty member asks a female student to sleep with him. Further, if student happen to say no, she should fully trust faculty member to not feel sexually rejected, and react to her negatively with any retribution. If her career gets negatively impacted after this event, it wouldn\u2019t be because of she denying sexual favor but because she was unfit for the job. By extension, this would be applicable to all men in position of power including politians, police, judges, managers, deans, supervisors and so on. As an inevitable corollary to this proposition it shouldn\u2019t then be crime to just include the question to all female job applicants if they would be willing to sleep with their supervisors on the job. It also doesn\u2019t escape to me how flexible, if any, ethical boundary this commentor posses direct implication of his argument is that a so called \u201cgenius\u201d should be allowed to commit crime on lesser \u201cnon-genius\u201d mortals. So perhaps should have been perfectly fine if he ever drunk drive and killed few people. May be if a \u201cgenius\u201d happen to enjoy kidnapping and then physically torturing a person in his basement, that tortured person should be happy that his sacrifice is helping with the whims of maintaining the existence of a \u201cgenius\u201d and he needs to be thankful to his contributions. Human rights, freedom, will \u2013 all that should cease to exist for lesser mortals when they interact with a \u201cgenius\u201d. Personally haven\u2019t seen such weak line of argument in decades and feel praying for all females who will come in contact with @Aron1984. My 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 64/82 December 11, 2018 at 9:56 am Carina December 11, 2018 at 4:55 pm Marnie Dunsmore apology if my description became bit graphic but hopefully this illustrates inevitable and necessary consequences of commentor\u2019s arguments. Reply @Anon: Let me just say something about my own \u201cmild\u201d response. The thing is, the views that Anon1984 articulates are quite common. Good people have these views. (And, 100 years ago, basically everyone would have agreed.) It has been a long \u2013 and somewhat painful \u2013 road for me to process that. Similarly, one thing I\u2019ve learned over the past year or so is just how many (good) people believe that women are genetically/biologically less likely to be highly intelligent (let alone geniuses), which of course reinforces Anon1984\u2019s point\u2026 because the assumption is that none of those younger women will ever rise to YP\u2019s scientific stature strongly disagree with all of this, of course, but think that taking too hard a line on the people who have these ideas just encourages them not to voice them, and then there\u2019s no chance to even argue about it. It\u2019s really hard to critique an idea if it\u2019s not out in the open. Reply \u201cIt has been a long \u2013 and somewhat painful \u2013 road for me to process that When was a graduate student at the University of British Columbia in the 1990s, the work station cluster in the building was being used as a porn harvester and server (a harbinger of pornhub). It was set up by senior graduate students and a few professors think it was widely known that this was going on, but nobody said anything about it was strongly encouraged to keep quiet about it. Also at was told by the wife of my first thesis supervisor (hey switched supervisors after this), that women had no mathematical ability and that they were not capable as engineers. Also during my graduate studies, one of the computer science professors that went to talk to about his work on mathematical treatments for singularities was livid that had made an appointment to come to talk to him. He made some nasty comment to me as tried to have a mathematical discussion with him had never met this guy before was just interested in his work, and my thesis supervisor had told me to go to talk to him. At the time was completely baffled by this. This actually happened when Maria Klawe had been head of the department at for a few years. Everyone was all cheery about the great strides women were making in and with Maria as head of the department think this just goes to show the divide 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 65/82 between the way universities market the advancement of women in to the public, compared to the actual experiences of women in these fields. At a semiconductor startup, my manager stood over my desk while was trying to meet a deadline to \u201ctape out\u201d my design, explaining to me that women couldn\u2019t design integrated circuits because they didn\u2019t have any spatial ability. At a Santa Clara startup worked at within the last five years, one of the other engineers at my paygrade decided to regularly order me around, demand that sort and deliver his mail and insist that respond immediately to his every request on a daily basis. This guy also started voicing off in our office space for hours at a time (while was trying to do my work) about painful ways to kill people. He would launch diatribes about politicians he would like to knock off with an automatic weapon. Having been an engineering student in Ottawa, Canada, in 1989 when 14 women engineers were targeted and killed \u201cfor being women engineers\u201d at Polytechnic in Montreal did not take his behavior lightly emailed the (it was a seven person startup) and said that thought these behaviors were inappropriate and that this person was creating a hostile work environment. Basically, at this point, the hired a team of attorneys, and wanted me to be legally deposed. This seems to be a standard practice in Silicon Valley to silence women who report sexual harassment or a hostile work environment. Hey, we\u2019re just office decorations regardless of our work product, and the male engineers, no matter how unproductive or destructive of the work environment, are untouchable. Then there was the large Silicon Valley semiconductor company where was assigned junior design tasks, even though had been told when was recruited that would be mentored into a lead/principal design position. When asked for more challenging and appropriate to my experience assignments was laid off. Oh, and the recent job at a large government agency where was treated like an admin and significantly underpaid compared to similarly or lesser experienced male coworkers. Again, the assignments were contrary to what had been told would be doing when was hired. If they would just say that they wanted me there as compliant and silent window dressing to make it look like they cared about hiring and developing women engineers, of course would not have taken these jobs. In my experience, it is virtually impossible to report gender harassment, or gender discrimination without reprisal. Even if you want to make the mildest and most conciliatory communications about what you are experiencing, be prepared to get nowhere or worse. Don\u2019t be surprised if there is retaliation. It is very, very common and almost institutionalized, at least in Silicon Valley and in high tech. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 66/82 December 11, 2018 at 8:05 pm Anon December 11, 2018 at 9:30 pm Marnie Dunsmore In my experience, most of the people communicate these kinds of experiences to have one of four responses: 1. they tell me need to toughen up and be \u201cless sensitive\u201d, rather than ask for better treatment, 2. they tell me something like: \u201cwhat did you expect? you should have known what you were getting into when you became an engineer\u201d 3. they deny and equivocate 4. they become fearful and noncommunicative (because they know that anyone associated with a harassment or discrimination report is in for trouble) In STEM, seeing women primarily as sexual objects, non-technical support staff, and of lesser capability technically, rather than as equal participants in the workforce and research community, is the norm, rather than the exception. Comments like those of Anon1984 don\u2019t surprise me at all just assume now that a large portion of the workforce thinks like this to varying degrees. Some women also think like this, by the way. It is sad and maddening, but if there is a silver lining, it is that more people are becoming aware that these assumptions and stealth behaviors are the norm. Women\u2019s absence from physics, engineering and computer science is not because of their lack of ability. It is because of their systematic subordination think that Anon1984 is saying that if somebody in a position of power asks you to have sex with them and you refuse, and then there is no retribution and no professional consequences then nothing bad has happened. However if somebody asks you to have sex with you, you say no, and then experience retribution or negative career consequences then believe that Anon1984 would advocate complaining and raising the issue to (or whoever) after which the perpetrator should be punished understand that you might find this point of view simplistic but think that there is also a good case for a straightforward approach to life. I\u2019m not saying that you should adopt this approach when casting a judgement on YP, but then I\u2019m not sure why it\u2019s anybody\u2019s responsibility to cast a judgement on other than G*d and the Microsoft department also think you exaggerated Anon1984 claims. It\u2019s a typical tactic: \u201crefute the exaggerated claim\u201d. Reply believe that Anon1984 would advocate complaining and raising the issue to (or whoever) after which the 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 67/82 December 11, 2018 at 9:01 am Anonymous perpetrator should be punished understand that you might find this point of view simplistic but think that there is also a good case for a straightforward approach to life.\u201d Has Anon1984 ever complained to about this kind of issue? For one, many companies do not have an \u201cHR\u201d. Most start-ups don\u2019t. Second mostly will use every strategy possible to silence the person reporting an inappropriate behavior almost never takes action. Dana\u2019s experience is typical. No action and no feedback does do one thing: they assess the risk of a lawsuit as soon as they get a harassment report. If the person reporting inappropriate behavior actually manages to find an attorney who will take their case, and they are not bound by an arbitration agreement, they are in for years of very stressful and time consuming legal rangling as the current class action lawsuit (Moussouris versus Microsoft) shows mostly exists to collect evidence it can use against someone reporting harassment or discrimination. They rarely will act against a high value employee, unless the evidence is inescapable. Think about the Susan Fowler case. She had cell phone snapshots of the harassing emails she was receiving from her boss, and she still couldn\u2019t get to take action to protect her. If you work in a startup, many states in the US, including California, pre- empt companies with less than 50 employees from legal obligations. Because most attorneys won\u2019t touch a harassment or discrimination case until it has been looked at by the EEOC, it is virtually impossible for a person reporting harassment to get legal representation if they have worked for a start up. All of this is to say that Anon1984\u2019s idea that a person who thinks they have experienced harassment can effectively report their concern to and expect fairhanded treatment is very, very na\u00efve. Anon1984 is living in a fantasy world. Too many video games or Star Trek episodes, perhaps? Yes, I\u2019m shocked that anyone is proposing that it\u2019s to hit on subordinates can say that even the \u201cI\u2019m not taking you seriously, I\u2019m just hitting on you\u201d vibe is deeply demoralizing (which is as far as my interactions with went.) Not having codes of conduct about this is detrimental to women\u2019s careers. And fail to see how physical attractiveness has anything to do with this would like senior researchers was discussing mathematics with not to treat me like a piece of meat. That\u2019s surely not too much to ask. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 68/82 December 12, 2018 at 5:42 am Ariel Gabizon December 12, 2018 at 12:01 pm Anonymous person December 12, 2018 at 12:30 pm Anonymous person December 13, 2018 at 3:10 am G3 December 16, 2018 at 3:31 am Jed Cooper Reply think it might be good to make some well-defined rules for cases we agree are inappropriate person with power making a pass at someone with less power\u201d is vague, and might even be too general and include scenarios we would intuitively agree are fine. For example think there should be a rule that \u201cIf the stated purpose of the meeting had a job offer element, the offeror should not be allowed to make a romantic/sexual move\u201d. As see it, this was the rule that was broken by in Dana\u2019s case. He suggested they meet to discuss her postdoc \u2013 him being a researcher at microsoft and her a PhD student towards the end of her thesis, that is a \u201cjob offer element\u201d of the meeting; and thus, no romantic move should\u2019ve been made at that meeting. You could argue that a more general rule should also hold \u2013 e.g. no math/cs professor should ever hit on any math/cs student in any context. Perhaps..honestly I\u2019m not sure there are no reasonable exceptions to that rule..but maybe let\u2019s start with things we agree on, and make them known official rules in the scientific community. Reply Looks like Microsoft Fired Him :0 Reply Looks like his homepage is gone: us/research/people/peres Reply Correct is not listed among Microsoft employees anymore. Reply am much surprised by the contents of your posts on and was previously unaware of these particular examples of harassment. There are some others that have heard about, or experienced. Here are some thoughts and questions that you may wish to consider. You show courage, and you seem successful where mighty businesses and universities have been failing. The technique you employ does resemble a \u201cjob lynch\u201d, in that both subjects 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 69/82 December 16, 2018 at 10:30 am Lior Pachter had to leave their main and famous institutions soon after the truth became public wonder, did anything happen to the human resources personal and higher administrators who were successfully hiding these matters for over a decade, and thus, in the latter case, served as accomplices in repeated sexual harassment looked in passing at the speaker/participant/organizer list of the international conference likely referred to in your post above. It is a high profile event, and may not be the one you meant, it serves as an example. With everything we know on now, both in terms of ethical standards and general attitude and behavior towards peers, he would not particularly stand out in this crowd. Compliments to exceptions. And it is sad to be writing that according to everything we know on TS, he seems ethically superior to the non-exceptions on that list. Indeed, university professors, mathematicians in particular, can well advance in career in spite of, and sometimes due to, their more or less exposed unethical and even abusive characters. Is the situation better in the administration? So natural questions seem to be: what happens next? what happens in the long run? In the Wild West, the first few lynches were probably courageous acts that quickly \u201cremoved\u201d the dangerous offenders from the innocent and fragile, unprotected by law and order. But then, as we know, this evolved in something highly undesirable. Encouraged by your successes, there could soon be unethical but otherwise highly influential and respectable peers, or groups of such peers, composing open letters and websites of similar nature, however based on false evidence. Their aim would be to ruin their rivals\u2019 reputations, get their jobs, get even or get ahead. What could prevent this from happening? Reply 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 70/82 December 16, 2018 at 7:23 am eventhisoneistaken December 16, 2018 at 12:59 pm Anonymous Yuval Peres The post concerns Yuval Peres, a principal researcher in the Microsoft Theory Group [update Dec. 26, 2018 is no longer employed at Microsoft] and a former colleague of mine at Berkeley. Below is a copy of an email sent yesterday to numerous theory of computer science professors worldwide, and published on the Stanford Theory \u2026 Continue reading 218 Bits of Reply @jed cooper \u201cTheir aim would be to ruin their rivals\u2019 reputations, get their jobs, get even or get ahead.\u201d How do you know none of those motives were involved in the case? \u201cWhat could prevent this from happening?\u201d Absolutely nothing. But hey \u2014 eggs, omelette few innocent men losing their jobs and becoming permanently unemployable is a small price to pay to tear down the patriarchy. For those few who do care, keep in mind the Zuleikha project: #MenToo and the Zuleikha project Amidst the #metoo moral panic, you can count on to provide a contrarian voice. This time, however, we\u2019d like to try our hand at some real-life activism. The precise details will emerge in future posts, but for now we\u2019re recruiting our multitudes of loyal readers for assistance. The #mentoo hashtag (apparently) documents the various \u2026 Continue reading 6 posttenuretourettes Reply Why do you make this about the case of wrongly accused innocents when in this particular case it is not? The obvious 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 71/82 December 16, 2018 at 1:13 pm Anonymous December 16, 2018 at 2:56 pm eventhisoneistaken December 16, 2018 at 11:04 am Marnie Dunsmore conclusion rather is that just as mob justice was replaced by a system of justice that works (at least in principle) fairly, for cases of sexual harrassment there will be a system of justice and punishment that actually works. So that a man who is on record for at least 3 cases of sexual harrassment would not have been allowed to stay in his position for over 10 years. Reply It\u2019s interesting you don\u2019t have the same level of concern for the many-more- than-few men *and* women whose psychological and physical well being has been ruined in silence for years and years. No one is suggesting that it is ok to punish people for no good reason, but the subject here is those who are unfairly accused. Why is this still so hard for you to wrap your mind around? Reply It\u2019s interesting that you\u2019re able to read my mind and know who do or don\u2019t have concern for (are you Nicolas Bray, by chance?). Concern for victims of harassment is amply represented on this thread \u2014 some justified, some overblown. Concern for falsely accused men is rather underrepresented seem to be the only one expressing it. In a saner world might get a word of thanks for introducing a diversity of opinions into this echo chamber am Not a Feminist, but. . .\u201d: Hegemony of a Meritocratic Ideology and the Limits of Critique Among Women in Engineering Authors: Carroll Seron, Susan Silbey, Erin Cech, Brian Rubineau Abstract: Engineering is often described as an enduring bastion of masculine culture where women experience marginality. Using diaries from undergraduate engineering students at four universities, the authors explore women\u2019s interpretations of their status within the profession. The authors\u2019 findings show that women recognize their marginality, providing clear and strong criticisms of their experiences. But these criticisms remain isolated and muted; they coalesce neither into broader organizational or institutional criticisms of engineering, nor into calls for change. Instead, their criticisms are interpreted through two values central to engineering culture: meritocracy and individualism. Despite their direct experiences with sexism, respondents typically embrace these values as ideological justifications of the existing 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 72/82 December 22, 2018 at 11:18 pm James Charter December 26, 2018 at 5:21 am Lior Pachter December 28, 2018 at 5:27 pm Anonymous December 28, 2018 at 5:29 pm Lior Pachter December 29, 2018 at 9:52 pm Anonymous January 7, 2019 at 3:36 am tomthebeaver distributions of status and reward in engineering and come to view engineering\u2019s nonmeritocratic system as meritocratic. The unquestioned presumption of meritocracy and the invisibility of its muting effects on critiques resembles not hegemonic masculinity\u2014for these women proudly celebrate their femininity\u2014but a hegemony of meritocratic ideology. The authors conclude that engineering education successfully turns potential critics into agents of cultural reproduction. journalCode=woxb Reply Lior, the first sentence of this post is incorrect. \ud83d\ude42 Reply Thanks for pointing that out updated the post to note that no longer works at Microsoft. Reply How do you know he is no longer employed? Was an announcement made about this, or do you just know because he is no longer on Microsoft\u2019s website first noticed his name absent from the Microsoft website, and later heard information (by now corroborated via a number of different sources) that he is no longer employed there have not seen an announcement from Microsoft. Microsoft doesn\u2019t make public announcements when it let\u2019s go of it\u2019s employees. For instance Alexander Holroyd and David Bruce Wilson were fairly recently laid off from the theory group without any announcement as such case is totally different though think a public statement by Microsoft now would be really helpful to the community. His webpage also no longer has his Microsoft or Berkeley 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 73/82 January 9, 2019 at 5:39 pm Jamie January 10, 2019 at 7:21 am Tyrion January 10, 2019 at 9:08 am Jamie January 10, 2019 at 6:05 pm Anonymous affiliations. Without a doubt, men must above all treat women with respect, and even more so when they are in a position of power. It is clear how poisonous sexual harassment is. However, in these discussions, something else should be recognized. Most men by nature have strong sexual drive, which can easily override their logic and common sense. It makes them take huge risks. An unattractive young man can have enough poisonous experiences with women to turn him into a harasser rather than lover. Is any horny man who is not a smooth operator (good with women) a sexual harasser, especially if he is unattractive? Is Mr. Peres an evil person, or is he also a victim in some sense? He clearly crossed the line in Dana\u2019s story, but where is that line? Let us suppose Mr. Peres\u2019 marriage turned sexless for one reason or another. His entire life revolved around academia, so let\u2019s suppose he didn\u2019t have many opportunities to make female friends outside of it. Is there a way he could have found a lover in his life circles that was appropriate? If a female student told him how much she enjoyed his class, would it be inappropriate for him to make any advances at all, after the class was over? Let her know he found her attractive without being insistent know what he did was wrong, and at the very least he could have said he was sorry, but cannot help but think that we judge him too harshly because he is an unattractive man who hit on women way outside his league. Reply But Dana is not in Scott\u2019s league either am disgusted by your assumption that Yuval\u2019s physical appearance has anything to do with this. Reply Mr. Peres was not proposing marriage, he was trying to hook up, and his attempt was way too direct. Of course, his looks have everything to do with what counts as crossing the line, or being too insistent. But that was not my main point. That\u2019s a ridiculous stance. I\u2019ve had lots of \u201cunattractive\u201d guys hit on me and it\u2019s 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 74/82 January 14, 2019 at 3:29 am Anonymous February 10, 2019 at 1:42 pm Graduate student February 10, 2019 at 2:23 pm Lior Pachter not usually disturbing. What\u2019s disturbing is when it\u2019s someone in power who should really know better. I\u2019m afraid that your actions won\u2019t serve women well in the long run. the-metoo-era-avoid-women-at-all-cost consequences-of-metoo/2018/12/04/9c7e0418-f80e-11e8-8d64- 4e79db33382f_story.html?utm_term=.a9c29bf1e6ce Reply this is an important issue to discuss but i\u2019m afraid Lior Pachter is not a person of moral qualifications to bring it up. he is notorious for his bad character and seemingly taking joy in destroying people. some years ago in this weblog he deliberately attacked a poor graduate student who was a rising star and on the academic job market. everybody except him agrees that he did so for the purpose of trashing someone who was in a vulnerable position, seems like it gives him the chills. read about this story here and judge for yourself The network nonsense of Manolis Kellis This is the second in a series of three posts (part1, part3) on two back- to-back papers published in Nature Biotechnology in August 2013: Baruch Barzel & Albert-L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Barab\u00e1si, Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations, Nature Biotechnology 31(8), 2013, p 720\u2013725. doi:10.1038/nbt.2601 Soheil Feizi, Daniel Marbach, Muriel M\u00e9dard & Manolis Kellis, Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct \u2026 Continue reading 67 Bits of Reply Your comment reminds me that need to blog about the paper \u201cNetwork Enhancement: a general method to denoise weighted biological networks\u201d from the Batzoglou and Leskovic groups. Amazingly in their paper, they show that Kellis\u2019 network deconvolution (by 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 75/82 April 1, 2019 at 6:33 am Anonwoman April 16, 2019 at 6:30 pm intrust antivirus software June 8, 2019 at 12:56 pm Anonymous July 26, 2019 at 8:19 am Aaron the way, Kellis was not a graduate student at the time but a professor at MIT), performs *worse* than \u201cRAW\u201d which is the method consisting of not doing anything to the raw data (!) They show this for both a a biological network problem and an image identification problem. Not only was the Kellis paper fraudulent, despite protestations at the time the method is useless. Thanks for the reminder! On a separate note, what you have done here is a combination of an ad hominem attack coupled to a straw man argument, both applied for the purpose of distracting from a very serious matter of sexual harassment have decided to approve and leave your post up here (despite the fact that you did not provide a legitimate email address as requested per the policy of this blog), because it is illustrative of the sexism that pervades science. The chills get are of thinking of the damage people like you inflict on a day-to-day basis in your workplace. Reply Hey guys am just reading this am baffled and shocked at Yuval\u2019s predatory behavior congratulate Lior for going against the wishes of the so once respected Oded. And lost my respect for Oded who requested to redact information on this issue. This is pretty low on his end. It must have taken courage as fellow researcher to go against such authority and for that, Lior, you deserve extra kudos. @Jamie, there are escort services that Yuval should have kept using instead of going after his own young sheep. Forgive me to mention this but i feel like there\u2019s also a cultural sense of this is behavior from my experience. Reply agree Anonwoman, Yuval\u2019s behavior was predatory. And cant say many people out there have Lior\u2019s kind of bravery. He has my respect. Reply Yuval seems to be the defendant in King county court case BEP201210. Do a name search in wonder if this has anything to do with his sexual harassment charges. Reply This is a question specifically to Marnie Dunsmore, but anyone else can feel free 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 76/82 August 23, 2019 at 9:55 pm Robbie Parker November 5, 2019 at 3:09 pm Anon November 7, 2019 at 6:49 am Anonymous November 8, 2019 at 1:43 pm November 8, 2019 at 4:59 pm Anonymous November 9, 2019 at 6:01 pm Lior Pachter to chime in. Dr. Dunsmore states that in fields both sexual harrassment and sexism (and the subjugation of women in the workplace that results from this) has been the norm in the and Canada (although in my opinion, UBC\u2019s computer labs being a post server is a separate issue, although problematic in its own right.) My question is how the work environment for women in highly technical but non fields \u2014 for example, in finance, medicine, or medical research \u2014 compare am asking because wonder if the corrosive environment for women in tech indicative of a much wider problem with corrosive work environments in general, or is particularly worse than other areas. Reply think Yuval\u2019s contributions to mathematics and TCS, and the absolute beauty of his work, outweigh his misconduct, which he apologized for and won\u2019t do in the future. Reply \u2026 and somehow he continues to be invited to give talks in otherwise well respected academic departments\u2026 Reply Someone should add all this stuff to his Wikipedia page: Reply think that there was a mention of this on his Wikipedia page, but it was removed. Reply One Wikipedia editor reported claims that had asked his collaborators to \u201csanitize\u201d his article. title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FPedantisch&type=revision As of right now the paragraph on sexual harassment on his wikipedia page has 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 77/82 January 16, 2020 at 12:56 pm Caveman January 16, 2020 at 1:37 pm Elizabeth Batory January 16, 2020 at 3:06 pm Lior Pachter been restored: Leaving aside the petty vindictiveness and the spectacle of anonymous commenters demanding Peres be publicly perma-shamed on his most visible biographic page \u2014- putting that stuff on his page is an abuse of the Wikipedia editorial standards. He is not a public figure, and all the references are to blogs and e-mail lists in which the material is written by interested and self-involved parties. Wikipedia requires (ostensibly) reliable sources published by (ostensibly) disinterested third parties. The only published report is in a Davis college newspaper article written by an undergraduate, probably not fact checked, and consisting of a cut and paste from the online blog discussions. Meanwhile, the accusations against Peres are all ex parte reports; the famous accusation letter on the Stanford email list stated that his conduct does not rise to the level of illegal sexual harassment; and (as the letter complained) while Peres\u2019 reply includes an apology, it does not concede that actual harassment occurred. So there are problems with the notability and the sources, by Wikipedia standards. Of course, if interested parties start pushing the Peres matter into higher- profile publications in order to bolster it for permanent inclusion on Wikipedia, that would be pretty evil. I\u2019d consider that a far higher degree of manipulation than Peres boosters editing the page (which is no worse, in fact better, than Peres detractors adding the accusations to the page, as it would reverse a violation of the content standards). Reply Dear Caveman, You don\u2019t seem to understand the main principle here: Pachter and his cronies think that Professor Peres is evil. This opinion justifies destroying Professor Peres\u2019 reputation and livelihood by any means necessary. So far, they have been quite successful. Wikipedia has a commenting system and guidelines in place for what content is deemed acceptable for pages. In the case of this story there has been extensive debate on the issues you raise (see For the record have not participated in editing the Wikipedia pages nor have asked anyone else to do so did check the references you allude to and the page currently has none to my blog. As a factual matter, there is one reference to the Stanford server (for 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 78/82 January 16, 2020 at 5:00 pm Caveman January 16, 2020 at 5:04 pm Lior Pachter YP\u2019s letter), and multiple references to an article published in The California Aggie (the official Davis newspaper): sexual-misconduct-allegations-levied-against-him-gives-lecture-at-uc-davis did not solicit the publication of that article, however did interview with the journalist who called me to let me know she was writing the piece, and some of my remarks are quoted in the story. The journalist did corroborate what wrote here ( at-uc-davis/), noting that \u201cThe Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action confirmed that Peres resigned from his affiliate position in 2012 \u2018after receiving notice that the university would be investigating allegations of sexual harassment.'\u201d You were not interviewed by a \u201cjournalist\u201d, but by a college student doing a minor in writing. Her sole journalistic activity consists of writing pieces about campus life for the college newspaper, and for some reason she decided to engage in activism by means of this article. Still, the reliability of the article itself can be evaluated. The college journalista wrote an unbelievably long and detailed hit piece, a term paper dossier on Peres\u2019 career and the impact of sexual harassment on women. She laundered some of the accusations (Anima, Lisha Li) into outright factual assertions about Peres (\u201cPeres\u2019 pattern of behavior was not limited to his time at UW\u201d); a real journalist at a real newspaper would have used qualifiers such as \u201calleged\u201d or been censored by the legal department. She made public records requests to obtain information from Berkeley (spoiler: \u201cno information regarding any sexual misconduct by Peres\u201d). All this digging for a campus life report on an event nobody on campus had paid much attention to. Of her sources at Berkeley, one gave her a polite brush-off, and the other characterized her inquiry, presumably correctly, as an attempt to \u201ctry to dig up rumors and allegations\u201d. The length, literally, to which she went makes the article appear to be either deliberate activism, a hit piece solicited by interested parties, or a naive college student going overboard. Pretty much no speaker in the history of university math lectures has had such a long and hostile Deep Dive into his background published in relation to a technical talk that did not make any waves on campus before or after the event. Whether the author did this on her own behalf or at the behest of others is not clear but to cite this as some neutral and reliable source for Wikipedia is ridiculous. Again, I\u2019m not sure why you are raising concerns about Wikipedia on my blog encourage you to move this discussion to where it is relevant. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 79/82 November 9, 2019 at 1:07 pm John Nirenberg November 9, 2019 at 5:50 pm Lior Pachter November 10, 2019 at 4:57 pm John Nirenberg November 12, 2019 at 3:23 pm Kay Kirkpatrick December 1, 2019 at 8:45 am How did Dana Moshkovitz not hear the word \u201cepsilon\u201d very often in her life???? Only two times ever?? Reply She makes clear that she is talking about the experience of hearing the word refer to something outside of mathematics that is non negligible, yet presented as negligible, i.e. use of the word to diminish something that\u2019s not unimportant general comment think a statement like Dana\u2019s, which is incredibly difficult to write, let alone share publicly, demands more than knee-jerk commentary and off-the-cuff responses suggest you consider carefully re- reading her statement, that you consider thoughtfully what she is saying, and that you then reflect on the implications of her experience. Reply don\u2019t think it is clear consider mathematics \u201cneutral apologize for my off-the-cuff response. Upon reflection think focused on the epsilon thing as a defense mechanism for (not) processing the heavy stuff she was saying feel very bad for her and am proud of her for speaking out. Medicine is part of STEM, and recommend reading Walking out on the Boys by Francis K. Conley. Things are similarly bad across all the fields you mentioned. Academia is second only to the military in terms of rates of sexual harassment. The rate of harassment in the financial industry appears to be similar to academia, although that industry has had large lawsuits which may have had an effect on behavior. Reply You mentioned that the rates of harassment in the financial industry appears to be similar to academia, and that academia is second only to the military in terms of rates of sexual harassment. 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 80/82 March 15, 2021 at 11:08 pm anonymous March 24, 2021 at 6:27 pm Anonymous March 24, 2021 at 6:40 pm Anonymous March 31, 2021 at 3:28 am Yuval Filmus I\u2019m curious to see which industries or sectors (public or private) have the lowest rates of sexual harassment. After all, if specific industries or sectors have high rates of harassment, it stands to reason that there are other industries that presumably have lower rates of harassment. Reply Yuval gave a talk at Kent State University last month am disgusted at how everyone forgets and normalizes sexual predators like him think in a few years he will resume his life back in academia and people move on from all the harm and pain he has inflicted without ever apologizing or even acknowledging it feel sick to my stomach to be in such a community. Reply ph.org/journals/of_article.php? jrn=jems&doi=1030 All Yuval\u2019s recently published papers have affiliation at Kent State University. Reply His upcoming talks are affiliated as \u201cvisiting Kent State University\u201d. Reply The goal of the original authors of the letter against Yuval Peres was never to have him cancelled completely. They considered the situation in which a serial sexual harasser is given honor after honor to be ludicrous. Now that Yuval Peres is stripped out of all positions of power, that his misdeeds are revealed to the public, that his character has (rightly) been assassinated, the original goal has been accomplished (and more). Yuval Peres will never be able to \u201cresume his life back\u201d and to have his reputation rehabilitated. His past will always follow him. He wasn\u2019t able to find a permanent position anywhere. The best he could find so far is a visiting 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 81/82 March 31, 2021 at 11:46 am Lior Pachter May 3, 2024 at 1:13 am jeffrey position at a rather low-profile university. Hopefully the lesson has been learned, if not by Yuval Peres himself, then by the community-at-large. Mathematics will gain nothing from preventing further positive contributions of Yuval Peres to probability theory. The community should make sure that his past actions are well-known, and he should not be put in positions of power (including writing recommendation letters, editing journals, organizing workshops, and so on). Even talks could be awkward. But writing papers does not seem objectionable enough to me. Reply Just a note that Yuval Peres is a \u201cResearch Assistant\u201d at Kent State. Reply Well, Peres is now a professor at Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications (BIMSA): In this recent talk on April 28, 2023, he proposes to supervise new PhD students to work with him\u2026. (see the last three minutes of the recording). Yuval Peres: Some highlights from the history of p Yuval Peres: Some highlights from the history of p\u2026 2/22/25, 8:35 Yuval Peres | Bits of 82/82"} |
7,290 | Serwyn Bialer | Columbia University | [
"7290_101.pdf",
"7290_102.pdf",
"7290_101.pdf",
"7290_102.pdf"
] | {"7290_101.pdf": "prof Bialer charged with sexual harassment student meets with her history professor to discuss her ideas for an upcoming paper. Seated next to his student, the professor begins caressing the student and invites her out for dinner, saying that if she wants to do well in the class, she should spend more time with him student is working late one night filing papers in his employer's office. After talking informally and joking with the student, his boss tells him that she finds him very attractive and has secretly admired him for months. She then asks him to sleep with her that night in exchange for a favorable letter of recommendation student in a literature class is consistently offended by sexist jokes and sexual innuendos her professor makes in class. When the student voices her distaste for the jokes, the professor accuses her of having no sense of humor. Sexual harassment can be defined in many ways: requests for sexual favors, unwelcome sexual advances, and other verbal abuse or physical conduct of a sexual nature, all are part of what constitutes sexual harassment. It usually occurs when someone in a position of authority abuses that authority to obtain sexual favors. More than one million female college students experience some form of sexual harassment during their academic career. At Columbia, 40 cases of sexual assault have been reported in the last five years, but statistics are deceiving, for national surveys report that sexual harassment is a widely under-reported crime. Some victims are sometimes too fearful of retaliation, or too embarrassed or traumatized by the experience to report the incidents, while others do not recognize sexual harassment when it occurs. Furthermore, some victims of sexual harassment at Columbia do not know what steps should be taken when they are harassed, or even what the University's policy toward sexual harassment is. Some have charged that Columbia's policy of strictly guarding alleged harasser's right to privacy might exacerbate the harassment problem here by allowing harassers to go unnamed, but continue their harassment. Spectator's three-part series on sexual harassment will examine a harassment case here, the University's grievance policy, and how some schools have dealt with the harassment issue by limiting the intimacy of relationships between faculty and students. By female graduate student has filed a formal grievance for sexual harassment against Professor of Political Science Seweryn Bialer. The student, who asked not to be identified, said Bialer pressured her for dates and a long-term relationship. The student claims the propositions began less than two weeks after the student began working for Bialer, who is the director of Columbia's Institute of International Change. [Box titled: Sexual Harassment: The Hidden Crime - first in a series] Over the next three semesters, the student claims Bialer made her offers ranging from invitations to fancy restaurants, to an invitation to spend the night, to a suggested long-term relationship as Bialer's mistress. \"It was a relationship characterized by extreme power imbalance,\" she said. \"As a student in this professor's field was extremely intimidated and felt threatened.\" Bialer refused to speak about the harassment procedures unless Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) Gillian Lindt and Provost Robert Goldberger commented on the case. Goldberger refused to comment, and Lindt could not be reached for comment. According to the student, the harassment began when Bialer cancelled a meeting they had scheduled because he was too tired. He proposed that they work later that day at his apartment\u2014 the plan being that they would \"work, grab a bite to eat, and then continue working,\" the student said arrived at the apartment and drinks were served. We did some work and all the time assumed that 'a bite to eat' was around the corner, but instead we ended up at a fancy restaurant was told to leave my books and we would come back to work,\" the student said. \"After we got back to his apartment, we hadn't started to work again when he began to make sexual advances towards me. He left the room and reentered the room having removed his trousers. He asked me to spend the night, and said 'no,'\" the student added. After the student refused Bialer's proposition, she said she excused herself and left the apartment. Bialer and the student had already arranged another working session for the next day, she said. \"When arrived at the University, he told me that he had left his materials at home. He said it in front of other people so was manipulated into going back to his apartment. It was a way to get me back alone in the apartment.\" \"Upon arrival, drinks were served, although never asked for anything,\" the student continued. \"He then suggested that we establish a long term arrangement where would be his mistress refused. Even after refused was told would be taken care of,\" she added. According to the student, Bialer asked her out to dinner again that same evening. \"He said, 'Oh, come on, we'll just be friends,' and very reluctantly agreed to have dinner with him. This proved the power relationship knew had to coexist with this person and was to work with him for months more.\" According to the student, more dinner invitations followed over the next two semesters. She said that more than once when he called her on the phone asking her for dinner and she refused, he ended the conversation by saying, \"I'm waiting for you.\" Furthermore, the student charged that Bialer began to reduce her job responsibilities in retaliation for her refusal to submit to his sexual advances felt this was a form of retaliation. It was a result of the sexual advances and felt very humiliated.\" According to the student, Bialer had no reason to terminate her employment for him because the quality of her work was consistently acceptable. \"My work was used and not thrown aside received no verbal or written criticism.\" The next semester, a new student was assigned her job and she was assigned to a different professor in the same office who did work outside her main field of interest. While she said her grades suffered during this time and she felt a total loss of autonomy and control, she didn't want to quit. The student said she discovered that three other women in the same office had also been sexually harassed by Bialer, each more than once. \"When asked other women in the office about him and realized that wasn't the only one harassed ironically felt a sense of relief. This proved that it wasn't me instigating the situation,\" she said. The student said that once she learned about these other women, she decided to confront Bialer and tell him her feelings about the whole situation. She refused to discuss exactly what was resolved at the meeting. While the sexual offers stopped at that point, she said Bialer continued to retaliate. \"He made comments about me to other professors, and heard about fabricated stories about me through other professors,\" she said. After the sexual harassment ended, the student decided to take charges against Bialer to the administration. Under the University's current grievance procedures, a person who believes she is the victim of sexual harassment can take her case either to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, or to any member of the 27-member university panel on sexual harassment. The panelists provide confidential counseling, make appropriate referrals for further action, and attempt to solve the problem informally, according to Rosalind Fink, director of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Fink said that when students or employees come to one of the panelists, they are first encouraged to take informal actions. The victim may be advised to write the harasser a letter describing the chain of events surrounding the facts of the alleged harassment, then describing how the writer feels about the events that occurred, and finally saying what the writer wants to happen next. If the victim is willing to be identified she may also ask a panelist to meet with the alleged harasser to ask him to discontinue his behavior. Students also have the option of meeting with the chair of the harasser's department. If all of these avenues have been exhausted and the student is still being harassed or is unsatisfied with the severity of actions taken against the professor, the University Office of General Council will investigate the situation before the student files a formal grievance. If the student is not satisfied with the results of this investigation, she may follow the formal grievance procedure where her case is assigned a review officer. Under the University's Discrimination Grievance procedure, the review officer first tries to resolve the student's complaint informally. If this is not possible, the officer must conduct another investigation and render a decision within 30 working days. If the student is still unhappy with the results of the review officer's decision, she may appeal to an appeal officer who reviews the review officer's decision and conducts any proceedings that he or she deems appropriate, rendering another decision within 30 working days. The decision of the appeal officer is final and is not subject to further review other than the reserved right of the President and the Trustees of the University. According to University General Counsel Mason Harding, there have been only three sexual harassment cases in the last five years in which the University has had to conduct its own investigation. \"In two of the cases, the harassers did not have much to say for themselves, so they were fired,\" Harding said. Harding added that in the most recent case, which fits the description of the student who accused Bialer of harassment, his office made an investigation and concluded that the Univer- See HARASS, 11> [The image includes a photograph labeled PHOTO\" showing Seweryn Bialer, who appears to be wearing glasses] sity had no basis to do more than give a warning to the harasser. According to Harding, the review officer also concluded independently that the case only warranted a warning to the professor. The student who charged Bialer with harassment said that she first brought her case to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action in July of 1985. She said she was encouraged to have the University conduct its own investigation first. After consenting to this procedure, the student said she asked the Office of the General Counsel under what circumstances a tenured faculty person could be dismissed asked the General Counsel in writing whether sexual harassment constitutes serious personnel misconduct which could warrant a professor's dismissal. But the University refused to interpret its own statutes to me and said that it was neither 'practical' nor 'productive' to respond to my requests,\" the student said. Associate General Counsel Beryl Abrams refused to comment on this case, saying that all sexual harassment cases are confidential. The students said she was not satisfied with the way in which the University investigation was conducted because whe was not allowed to meet with the harasser. She has charged Columbia with attempting to quiet the investigation because of Bialer's prominence in his field. \"The University encourages you to have the General Counsel do an investigation first so that it can keep the whole thing very confidential and so they can fire a faculty person only if they want to. They wanted this harasser to stay at the University and they're doing anything to keep him,\" the student said. But Fink said that a professor's professional status is not considered in harassment cases am confident that appropriate steps will be taken, even if a faculty person is highly respected or famous,\" Fink said. The student said that when the investigation by the General Counsel concluded, the investigators issued what she called a \"grossly jumbled report\" and decided that Bialer should not be fired, but they classified him as having a \"gregarious and open manner.\" \"My question is, is being gregarious and having an open manner exclusive of being a sexual harasser?\" the student asked say, no!\" Two days after the General Counsel investigation ended in December of 1985, she filed a formal grievance and was assigned a review officer. The student complained she was not given the chance to screen the review officer to see if he or she were adequately trained in processing sexual harassment cases wanted a competent and knowledgable person, capable of weighing the evidence judging my case,\" she said. According to Harding, the review officer can be a faculty member, dean or director in the University, and he or she is chosen based on who the accused harasser is. \"The review officer must be someone suitable for the level of the person accused. If a tenured faculty member is accused you cannot have a junior faculty member act as the review officer,\" Harding said. According to the student, the review officer asked her to negotiate and bargain her position without knowing anything about Bialer's position. \"He could take my written statement and present a defense for weeks and weeks and was totally in the dark didn't know anything about his testimony for heard no oral communication of his position. He had fifty-one pages from me and had half a page of things about his position,\" the student said. \"They don't issue findings until you refuse to continue your grievance. How did know what they were asking me to sign would be accepting his version without knowing the facts,\" she said. The student said that during the review officer's investigation, she was not given any weekly status reports on the case. According to the student, both Yale and M.I.T. have grievance procedures which provide for periodic reports to the complainant as the status of the complaint was writing my review officer and not getting any answer. When did get an answer, the answer was all glossed over. It makes you lose confidence,\" she said. The student refused to reveal the name of the review officer, so she could not be reached for comment. According to Harding, there is nothing written in the University's formal grievance procedure that requires the review officer to send the harassment victim a status report on the progress in the case. In the spring of 1986, the review officer reached a decision identical to the decision made by the University lawyer in the initial investigation. The student said she appealed because she was unhappy with the conclusions made by the review officer did not agree with the conclusions she drew. She made incorrect assumptions about sexual harassment and had incorrect facts which believe can prove,\" she said. The student refused to show the reporter the written decision made by the review officer and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action refused to give the report because it is made confidential. According to the student, she appealed the review officer's decision and brought her case to an appeal officer where the case is still pending. The student refused to comment on the present status of case.", "7290_102.pdf": "The Bialer Controversy: Sexual Harassment At Columbia By Leora Joseph The application of the sexual harassment policy at Columbia has been, at best, confused Spectator article published November 21, 1986 stated part of the policy. \"In the event an employee is found to have acted in an improperly discriminatory manner or committed sexual harassment, an appropriate record of that finding and any disciplinary action may be placed in the employee's personal file.\" Columbia University does not record the case on the employee's file. The only sanction that the University takes are either a warning or a dismissal. On Saturday March 21, 1987 Columbia College and Barnard cosponsored a Dean's Day for their alumnae in Washington. The keynote speaker was Dr. Seweryn Bialer who spoke on \"the Soviet Future.\" Bialer is a renowned scholar. For this reason he was asked to address the Washington event. Bialer, however, was found guilty of sexual harassment. In her review officer's decision of March 19, 1986, Gillian Lindt stated that: The accused by his own admission made sexual advances to the complainant have concluded that in this instance the professor engaged in behavior inappropriate to a faculty member of this University\u2014behavior which, however, was perceived by the complainant as having the effect of unreasonably interfering with her work . . . In my view this behavior . . . demeaned and threatened the student and thus constitutes a form of sexual harassment as defined under the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines on sexual harassment and as adopted by Columbia's Policy Statement on Sexual harassment. Presumably, following Columbia University sexual harassment policy, Bialer was issued a warning. Nothing was written on his personal file, even though the Review Officer's report presents evidence of repeated harassment by Professor Bialer of the student in question. Although University General Counsel Mason Harding told the Spectator (11/21/86) that \"if it's a repeated action, then action should go on record,\" no such action was taken by the University. Ironically, not only was Professor Bialer found guilty and no concrete punitive action was taken but he was honored at Dean's Day. According to sources, the deans in whose name Dean's Day was being held received information packets protesting Bialer's appointment as keynote speaker. Included in this packet was the review officer's decision. However, no successful attempt was made to replace Professor Bialer as the keynote speaker. The Bialer case illustrates the unwillingness of society's institutions to recognize sexual harassment as a crime perpetrated on women. Barnard values women for their intellectual capability, not as sexual objects. It is a disgrace that Bialer, who violated the essence of our community was chosen to represent us"} |
7,771 | Brad Carlin | University of Minnesota | [
"7771_101.pdf",
"7771_102.pdf"
] | {"7771_101.pdf": "\u2018It was a worst nightmare situation for me.\u2019 Photograph: Marcio Jose Sanchez Artificial intelligence (AI) This article is more than 7 years old As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' Sexual harassment and groping allegations against a suspended researcher are part of an industry culture that condones sexist behavior, women say Sam Levin in San Francisco Fri 22 Dec 2017 11.00 atherine Heller felt helpless. The Duke University professor was at a statistics conference last year when, she said, she witnessed Steven Scott, a senior artificial intelligence (AI) researcher at Google, make sexual advances on one of her female students. According to Heller, when she spoke to Scott later at an event dinner, he was defensive and told the professor that she should be nice to him considering that he had secured her a Google-funded faculty research award. \u201cIt was pretty shocking that he would say something like that,\u201d said Heller, 38, who alleged that Scott had also tried to kiss her in an elevator at a conference in 2010, forcing her to push him off. \u201cIt was disturbing what had happened to my student. It was a worst nightmare situation for me as a female adviser to a female student.\u201d The day after the incident, Heller said her student was distraught and talked about dropping out of the field for the first time. Given that Scott was not employed by her university, Heller didn\u2019t know how she could report his behavior What is AI? Show 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 1/8 Last week, following sexual harassment and groping allegations by another woman in data science, Google suspended Scott. The episode marks the latest sexual misconduct controversy to hit the tech sector and academia at a time when women in Silicon Valley, entertainment and media are publicly speaking out in record numbers, bolstered by the viral #MeToo campaign. The allegations against Scott, who declined to comment, has shone a harsh light on harassment in the male-dominated field of statistics, data science and machine learning. Some said misconduct was common \u2013 especially at conferences that blend professional work with socializing \u2013 and that serial harassers rarely face consequences. In some cases, sexual misconduct has pushed women out of the field altogether. Beyond the personal devastation, there is long-term damage for machine learning and AI, a sector that is dramatically reshaping society, sometimes with powerful technology plagued by harmful biases. Women have been sharing stories in the wake of a blogpost by Kristian Lum, a statistician at the Human Rights Data Analysis Group. In an interview, Lum said she hoped her story would help other women come forward can\u2019t spend the rest of my life going around trying to block people who know are bad actors,\u201d said Lum, 33. \u201cIt does take an emotional toll \u2026 What we really need is a broader conversation and culture change.\u201d Lum\u2019s post did not name Scott, but Bloomberg and other sources have confirmed that he is the man identified as \u201cS\u201d in her story Google spokeswoman also confirmed Scott\u2019s suspension. In her viral Medium post, Lum said was the \u201cworst offender\u201d in the field and that at a 2010 conference, he befriended her and a friend \u201cacting interested in our research\u201d. But while swimming with a group of conference participants, she wrote repeatedly grabbed me under the water, putting his hands on my torso, hips, and thighs\u201d. He picked her up and carried her away, she continued struggled, gently at first and then more forcefully, and he let me go.\u201d Others were targeted, she said: \u201cHe relentlessly pressured my friend, a female graduate student, to have sex with him.\u201d At a Google reception a few years later stood behind Lum and talked loudly about \u201cbanging smokin\u2019 hot chicks\u201d, and when she gave him a look, \u201che replied that was just jealous that he wasn\u2019t talking about me\u201d, she wrote. After the alleged groping incident in 2010, she said she became increasingly frustrated with the culture that condones this kind of behavior, contributing to her decision to leave academia really felt embarrassed by the whole thing,\u201d she said in an Katherine Heller. Photograph: Courtesy of Katherine Heller repeatedly grabbed me under the water, putting his hands on my torso, hips, and thighs Kristian Lum 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 2/8 interview, adding: \u201cThere certainly was a critical mass of people who did know, and really nothing was being done about any of this.\u201d Scott declined to respond to a detailed list of allegations, citing Google\u2019s ongoing investigation. In her post, Lum also said a professor had recently made an offensive joke about sexual assault and had sent her Facebook messages, referencing sex and porn. He was later identified as Bradley Carlin, a University of Minnesota biostatistics professor, who sent an apology about his \u201cill-considered joke\u201d to the Guardian and declined to comment further pending a university investigation. \u2018We are losing role models\u2019 Since she published her story, Lum said she had heard from many women with similar stories and several who said they left the field or were considering leaving due to harassment. Heller said that she was anxious to even report Scott to her university, even though there was little the school could do about a researcher at a private company was worried about what consequences this could have for my career. And that\u2019s nothing compared to what consequences this could have for my student\u2019s career,\u201d she said, adding that although some women are now feeling more emboldened to speak up, \u201ca lot of people are still scared to come forward\u201d. Lum is well aware of the importance of diversity in her field. She has researched predictive policing programs, exposing how flawed data and can replicate and exacerbate racially biased law enforcement practices. \u201cWe are losing role models for the next generation of women,\u201d she added. \u201cAnytime you are losing a researcher, you are losing whatever advances they could\u2019ve made.\u201d Algorithms have also suffered from gender biases. It was recently revealed that Google Translate was producing sexist results by automatically matching male pronouns to certain professions and traits. Amy Cho, co-founder of an education startup that is using AI, said she quit a previous tech job due to sexual harassment and HR\u2019s lack of response. \u201cThe system is so broken. So much more of the onus is placed on the victim than the harasser.\u201d Vulnerable graduate students may choose not to report mistreatment at all and instead leave the field, said Lisa Lendway, a Macalester College statistics professor. \u201cIt\u2019s hard enough to go through a program. To have that on top of it probably would\u2019ve just quit.\u201d Contact the author: [email protected] Kristian Lum. Photograph: Picasa/Courtesy of Kristian Lum The system is so broken. So much more of the onus is placed on the victim than the harasser \u200bAmy Cho 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 3/8 More on this story Google walkout: global protests after sexual misconduct allegations 1 Nov 2018 Google's 'bro-culture' meant routine sexual harassment of women, suit says 1 Mar 2018 Google gave top executive $90m payoff but kept sexual misconduct claim quiet \u2013 report 25 Oct 2018 Most viewed 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 4/8 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 5/8 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 6/8 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 7/8 2/22/25, 8:36 As Google researcher accused of harassment, female data scientists speak of 'broken system' | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The G\u2026 8/8", "7771_102.pdf": "Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field Sexual harassment accusations have hit another corner of the tech industry, with allegations involving prominent artificial intelligence researchers, including one at Google, a leader in the field. Mark Bergen and Jeremy Kahn (Bloomberg San Francisco Sat, December 16, 2017 exual harassment accusations have hit another corner of the tech industry, with allegations involving prominent artificial intelligence researchers, including one at Google, a leader in the field. Data scientist Kristian Lum wrote in a blog this week that a man she called \"S\" grabbed her inappropriately at an industry conference in 2010 and said he took advantage of another woman she didn\u2019t identify on separate occasions. Two people who were told about the conduct from two alleged victims told Bloomberg the man is Steven Scott, a senior researcher at Google. Lum also wrote that a well-respected academic touched her inappropriately on the leg at the same conference and later sent her innuendo-laced messages. The man was later identified as Bradley Carlin, an expert in biostatistics, by people familiar with the alleged conduct. 2/22/25, 8:36 Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field - World - The Jakarta Post 1/5 The allegations were widely discussed on social media, drawing supportive comments and similar stories from researchers in academia and leading tech companies, including Alphabet Inc.\u2019s Google and Microsoft Corp. Eric Horvitz, a Microsoft research director, called Lum\u2019s post a \"powerful and important report\" \"I\u2019d love to tell my side of the story, but I\u2019m afraid you\u2019ll need to get it from [email protected],\" Scott wrote in an email, referring to Google\u2019s public relations department. \"Google is investigating the matter,\" Gina Scigliano, a company spokeswoman, said. Scott has been suspended from Google as of Friday, according to a person familiar with the matter. Carlin, a professor at the University of Minnesota, referred questions to the school, which said it is aware of the accusations but declined to comment further. The researchers involved are experts in Bayesian statistics, which underpins a powerful type of known as machine learning. The accusations have surfaced during a growing debate over the lack of diversity among machine learning researchers and whether computer scientists are paying enough attention to bias \u2013 including gender and racial bias \u2013 in the data sets they are using to train systems. The allegations came to light after the recent conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) in Long Beach, California. Some attendees complained that aspects of some parties held during the conference were inappropriate and potentially offensive to women. They also condemned a joke about sexual harassment made by Carlin, a 2/22/25, 8:36 Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field - World - The Jakarta Post 2/5 member of an amateur band that performed at the closing night party. Carlin, the band\u2019s keyboardist, joked about the sexual misconduct allegations that forced the resignation of U.S. Senator Al Franken. After several attendees complained on Twitter that making light of sexual harassment was inappropriate, Carlin apologized on the band\u2019s Facebook page. Lum, who was not at the conference, learned of the incident and then wrote in the blog that she was \u201cunsurprised to learn that a person involved in making the troubling comments is a well-respected academic who is widely known to behave inappropriately at conferences.\u201d Without naming Carlin directly, Lum said the academic had touched her inappropriately on the leg during an informal presentation she gave at a Bayesian mathematics conference in 2010. He also commented on her dress, saying it \u201cwas too sexy\u201d for such an academic talk. Over the ensuing years, she wrote, the person sent her several innuendo-laced or inappropriate private Facebook messages, including messages in which he discussed watching pornography would like to defend myself against her accusations, but the matter has already been referred to my university\u2019s team, which I\u2019m told will be conducting a full investigation into the matter,\" Carlin wrote in an email to Bloomberg, referring to the University of Minnesota\u2019s Equal Employment Opportunity department. \"So I\u2019ve been instructed not to say anything more publicly pending the results of that investigation.\" Evan Lapiska, a spokesman for the university, said the school is \"aware of public accusations\" involving Carlin but declined to comment further citing privacy protections. 2/22/25, 8:36 Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field - World - The Jakarta Post 3/5 Lum declined to comment. In her post, she detailed further incidents of alleged harassment at the same 2010 conference. The \"worst offender,\" she wrote, was a researcher that she only identifies as \"S.\" At the end of the conference, while she was swimming with other researchers, the person grabbed Lum without her consent and put \u201chis hands on my torso, hips, and thighs,\u201d according to the post. Other female mathematicians spoke similarly to Lum about S, Lum added. And she wrote that he had \"taken advantage of a junior person\" under the influence of alcohol. She said that several years later at another conference, during a reception hosted by Google, she overheard the same person bragging to friends about \u201cbanging smokin\u2019 hot chicks.\u201d When Lum gave him a castigating stare, he told Lum she was only jealous he hadn\u2019t been talking about her, according to the blog knew it would be even more difficult to get people to find S\u2019s behavior problematic since he is employed by a large tech company,\" she wrote. The person in Lum\u2019s post is Scott, a director of statistics research at Google, according to two people familiar with the situation. Katherine Heller, an assistant professor at Duke University, recognized Scott in Lum\u2019s description and told Bloomberg that he had acted inappropriately with a former student of hers. Heller also said that several other female researchers had reached out to her with similar stories about other men in the field after Lum\u2019s blog post was published. \"There really is just a lot of sexual harassment of women in Bayesian statistics and machine learning,\" Heller said. Another person in the field said she had witnessed Scott\u2019s actions with women in the past, but asked not to be identified given the sensitivity of the topic. 2/22/25, 8:36 Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field - World - The Jakarta Post 4/5 \u201cThank you for having the courage to speak out about this terrible behavior,\" Jeff Dean, head of Google\u2019s Brain unit, tweeted to Lum. \"This has no place in science, math, statistics, computing, or anywhere else.\u201d Dean was commenting generally and he didn\u2019t respond to an email asking about Scott. Lum said that after she saw in October that \"S\" had been nominated as a candidate for the board of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis (ISBA), she brought concerns about his behavior to the organization\u2019s president and he was removed from the ballot. Scott, who has been at Google since 2008, was a candidate for the board and is no longer on the ballot, according to ISBA\u2019s website and one person with knowledge of the organization who spoke to Bloomberg. Kerrie Mengersen, ISBA\u2019s president, did not respond to questions about Scott. But she said in an email that she and ISBA\u2019s executive committee supported Lum coming forward with her account. \u201cThe Executive Committee takes any report of inappropriate behavior very seriously,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have a great Society and a proud record of including women as members and as leaders. However, like many societies, we have recognized that we need to do more.\u201d Mengersen said the organization was in the process of establishing protocols for appropriate behavior and support mechanisms for members who have been harassed. 2/22/25, 8:36 Google researcher accused of sexual harassment, roiling field - World - The Jakarta Post 5/5"} |
8,824 | Mark Rosenberg | Florida International University | [
"8824_101.pdf",
"8824_102.pdf",
"8824_103.pdf",
"8824_104.pdf"
] | {"8824_101.pdf": "News Resignation Sexual Harassment Published Jan 24, 2022 at 5:50 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way Free ChatGPT Browser Sider 0 Florida International University (FIU) President Mark Rosenberg is facing a harassment investigation after resigning on Friday, citing his and his wife's health conditions. By Ayumi Davis Fellow Newsweek Is Trust Project Member News Article $1 Login 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 1/15 In a statement shared by FIU's Board of Trustees on Sunday, Rosenberg, 72, said that he \"caused discomfort for a valued college\" because of issues resulting from the impact of his wife's medical condition on him unintentionally created emotional [not physical] entanglement have apologized apologize to you take full responsibility and regret my actions,\" Rosenberg said in the statement. The school hired an independent law firm to head the investigation, according to the Miami Herald woman in her 20s who worked closely with Rosenberg confided in a colleague, telling them that the university president had been harassing her for months, the Herald reported. The harassment allegedly started in October, according to the Herald. The woman rejected his advances, saying they made her feel uncomfortable. Rosenberg repeatedly apologized, saying it would not happen again. However, a few weeks later he did the same thing, the woman claimed. She again expressed her discomfort. After it allegedly happened a third time, the woman distanced herself from Rosenberg, telling a college she could not work with him any longer, the Herald reported. Dean Colson, a member of the Board of Trustees, launched the investigation after Rosenberg told him what occurred, according to the Associated Press. The woman was placed on paid administrative leave $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 2/15 It took several weeks for the woman to agree to talk with investigators, which she did on Wednesday, the Herald reported. On Thursday, Rosenberg was given the choice to either resign or be terminated during an emergency meeting of FIU's Board of Trustees, according to AP. The statement from Rosenberg on Sunday \"provides greater insight into his resignation of Friday,\" Colson said in the statement. \"It also provides insight into why the Board did not believe Friday was the appropriate time to celebrate the many accomplishments of the past 13 years,\" Colson said in the statement. \"We are deeply saddened and disappointed by the events requiring his resignation.\" Florida International University President Mark Rosenberg is facing a harassment investigation after resigning on Friday, citing his and his wife's health conditions. Above, Rosenberg speaks to the media about a pedestrian bridge near Florida International... More $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 3/15 Colson said in the statement that has \"strong personnel and workplace conduct policies\" and takes all workplace conduct seriously. He said the university \"remains committed to enforcing its policies thoroughly and swiftly.\" Rosenberg originally released a statement announcing his resignation on Friday, citing \"recurring personal health issues\" and \"the deteriorating health of my wife, Rosalie.\" Kenneth Jessell, FIU's chief financial officer and senior vice president of finance and administration, was nominated as interim president by the trustees, according to West Point Grads Demand Alum Resign as Rep Over Oath Keepers Membership Professor Says Pedophiles Should Be Called 'Minor-Attracted People' Professor Quits Amid Investigation Into 'Homophobic and Misogynistic' Posts Anti-Woke University of Austin Hires Professor Accused of Tranpshobia Request Reprint & Licensing Submit Correction View Editorial Guidelines $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 4/15 Royally Abandoned: Celebrities Who've Moved On From Meghan Markle Herbeauty Mom Covered Baby In Tattoos And The Internet Is Shocked! Herbeauty 12 Greatest Selfies Of The Year From All Over The World Herbeauty These Twins' Captivating Beauty Strikes Us With Awe Herbeauty What\u2019s Jennifer Aniston Got To Do With The Latest Obama Drama? Herbeauty Drastic Transformations: Camila Cabello And Other \u0421elebs Herbeauty $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 5/15 Newsweek Radio Embracing Trump Derangement Syndrome, Expect Social Security Payment Delays For Justice! With Rakim\u2026 Finally Good Week for Trump\u2019s Opposition? The Josh Hammer Show Fight Night at Princeton: Josh Hammer v. Dave Smith on U.S.- Israel Relations Top Stories 'Trump Before Trump': How Hungary Foreshadows America's Right-Wing Embrace $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 6/15 Donald Trump Blasted After Ousting Joint Chiefs Chairman 'CQ' Brown $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 7/15 Trump's Birthright Executive Order\u2014Experts Call It Direct Violation of 14th Amendment $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 8/15 Ayumi Davis One in Four Canadians See as 'Enemy' Country About the writer $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 9/15 Trending $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 10/15 01 21 comments 02 25 comments 03 31 comments 04 405 comments 05 7 comments \u2190 Back To Homepage What Is MyDogeDividend? What to Know About Stimulus Check Website Judge Halts Deportations After Trump 'Invasion' Claims Stimulus Check Creator Came Up With Plan in a Dream Trump Acknowledges Russia 'Attacked' Ukraine but Defends Putin When Are March 2025 Social Security Payments Coming $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 11/15 By Jim Banks By Matt Robison Sen. Jim Banks: Trump Leading America Into New Golden Age | Opinion The Dealmaker-in-Chief Just Sold Off America's National Security | Opinion Trump Is Creating a Deep State | Opinion By Ross Rosenfeld Munich's Blind Spot\u2014the Security Threats Europe Refuses To See | Opinion By Tanya Goudsouzian Vance in Munich and Foreign Policy Realism for the Modern World By Josh Hammer The Dealmaker-in-Chief Just Sold Off America's National Security | Opinion By Matt Robison Diplomats Aren't Ready for Primetime\u2014But They're Learning | Opinion By Benjamin Jensen, Yasir Atalan, And Ian Reynolds Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Green MAGA' Will Need Blue Allies | Opinion By Tim Ryan And Justin Zorn $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 12/15 U.S. World Science Health Rankings Opinion Entertainment Fact Check My Turn Education Events Sports Podcasts Better Planet Better Workplaces Vault Mightier Autos Newsletters Unconventional Vantage Experts Subscriptions Digital+ Monthly (Ad Free Trial) $1.00 Digital+ Yearly $49.00 Premium Monthly $9.99 Premium Yearly $99 Sen. Jim Banks: Trump Leading America Into New Golden Age | Opinion By Jim Banks Trump Has Betrayed Our Allies and Our Principles | Opinion By David Faris Polish Foreign Minister Key to Poland's Prosperity | Opinion By Rados\u0142aw Sikorski In Japan, Cautious Optimism About Trump 2.0 | Opinion By Mark Joseph The Two-State Solution Died With Ariel and Kfir Bibas | Opinion By Casey Babb Use Degraded by a Grade | Opinion By Tom Rogers $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 13/15 Voices Trending Israel at War Vladimir Putin Russia-Ukraine War Donald Trump Newsletters in your inbox See all The Bulletin (Daily) See Sample The Gist of It (Daily) Geoscape (Twice a Week) The 1600 (Daily) Inside Trump Policy (Weekly) Sports Daily (Daily) The Josh Hammer Report (Weekly) See Sample For The Culture (Three Times a Week) See Sample Discoveries (3 Times a Week) Like & Subscribe (Daily) Breaking News (As it Breaks) The Debate (Twice a Week) Pawsitively (Daily) Better Planet (Weekly) Newsweek Pulse (2x3 Times a Month) Email address Sign up now You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy In The Magazine March 07 2025 Issue $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 14/15 Company About Us Masthead Diversity Announcements Archive Policies and Standards Mission Statement Leadership Newsletters Press Center Editions: U.S. Edition \u65e5\u672c Polska Rom\u00e2nia Contact Advertise Careers Contact Us Corrections Terms of Use Cookie Policy Copyright Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Terms of Sale Privacy Settings \u00a9 2025 $1 2/22/25, 8:36 College President Said Health Caused Resignation, But Harassment Investigation is Under Way - Newsweek 15/15", "8824_102.pdf": "Former President Mark Rosenberg to return to school in teaching role after stepping down from admin post By Miami Team October 13, 2022 / 9:48 Miami -- Florida International University's former president, who resigned the administrative post over misconduct allegations filed by a female co-worker, is expected to return to the college in a teaching role. In an email statement to 4, an spokesperson confirmed that Mark Rosenberg, 73, will return to the campus next January to teach an elective course. He will be paid just shy of $377,000 to serve as an instructor for the class. The former university leader has been on a paid sabbatical since leaving the post nine months ago. According to the Miami Herald, he was still earning his $502,578 salary while on sabbatical.. But when he returns to lead the spring semester class at the Steven J. Green School of International & Public Affairs, his salary will drop by nearly $126,000, officials said News Weather Sports Videos Miami Shows 69\u00b0 Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:36 Former President Mark Rosenberg to return to school in teaching role after stepping down from admin post Miami 1/3 Rosenberg resigned the university's presidency after a woman who worked with him in his office accused him of making unwanted sexual advances. \"I've obviously done a lot of reflection during my sabbatical,\" Rosenberg told the Herald Wednesday. \"And I'm excited to be coming back have a lot of appreciation for the university and the people who work there.\"' More from News Nunez unanimously approved as interim president by Board of Governors students' unforgettable moments at South Beach Wine and Food Festival Former Miami-Dade firefighter faces charges in training exercise death How to watch Dolphins Cancer Challenge this Saturday Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:36 Former President Mark Rosenberg to return to school in teaching role after stepping down from admin post Miami 2/3 \u00a92025 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Details 4 News Sports Weather Contests Program Guide Sitemap About Us Advertise Television Jobs Public File for Public File for / My TV33 Public Inspection File Help Applications Report \u00a9 2022 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. In: College Miami Team The Miami team is a group of experienced journalists who bring you the content on CBSMiami.com. Twitter Facebook Instagram Watch News 2/22/25, 8:36 Former President Mark Rosenberg to return to school in teaching role after stepping down from admin post Miami 3/3", "8824_103.pdf": "What are you looking for? Search Home \u203a News \u203a Florida International U\u2019s disgraced president is back (Inside Higher Ed) In the Media Florida International U\u2019s disgraced president is back (Inside Higher Ed) 21 October, 2022 Florida International U\u2019s disgraced president is back Florida International University\u2019s president is returning to campus as a professor\u2014to the tune of $377K per year\u2014after a sexual harassment scandal. Full article Extract: Mark Rosenberg, Florida International University\u2019s longtime president, stepped down in January. He initially said it was due to a family matter but later admitted that he\u2019d been accused of inappropriate conduct involving a subordinate. Contact Search 2/22/25, 8:37 Florida International U's disgraced president is back (Inside Higher Ed) 1/3 Rosenberg, who is also a tenured professor of political science at FIU, has since been on research leave, receiving his full presidential salary of $502,579. Now he plans to return to the faculty in the spring term, co-teaching two courses (the university initially said he\u2019d be teaching just one course per term) at a salary of $376,934. He\u2019s eligible for a $30,000 research budget and a staff assistant, as well. (\u2026) Ann Olivarius, a sexual discrimination and harassment lawyer, in a statement said that was \u201cpassing the trash,\u201d a term used to describe how academic institutions have been known to quietly allow harassers to move on to other colleges and universities. In this case, however is accused of \u201cpassing the trash\u201d to itself. Type: In the Media Topics: Higher Education, Sexual Harassment Tagged: Ann Olivarius, Florida International University, Title IX, Women's rights What are you looking for? Search Contact us FAQs Practice Areas Case Studies Privacy Policy Legal Notices Feedback and Complaints Statement on Modern Slavery YouTube LinkedIn Instagram 2/22/25, 8:37 Florida International U's disgraced president is back (Inside Higher Ed) 2/3 Facebook Our solicitors and attorneys are licensed to practice in England and Wales, Ireland, and the following states: California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registered number 498087 | Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Some photos on this website are stock images and do not depict clients or people associated with the firm. McAllister Olivarius \u00a9 2025 Designed and produced by Stone Creative Design 2/22/25, 8:37 Florida International U's disgraced president is back (Inside Higher Ed) 3/3", "8824_104.pdf": "Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment staffer claims Rosenberg called her \u2018princess,\u2019 asked to be her \u2018lover,\u2019 followed her, took pictures Sanela Sabovic, Reporter Andrea Torres, Digital Journalist Published: March 2, 2022 at 4:53 Updated: March 3, 2022 at 6:54 Tags: Miami-Dade County, University Park, Education rip current statement in effect for Coastal Broward and Coastal Miami Dade Regions Sexual harassment Lt. Gov Nunez board member names Nu\u00f1ez a plans to build\u2026 Former 2 ESPA\u00d1OL Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 1/8 \u2013 An investigator reported the former president of Florida International University admitted to asking a woman under his direct supervision if \u201ccompanionship was of interest\u201d to her in October, but she said that what he actually asked was if she wanted to become his \u201clover.\u201d She said he later started to call her a \u201cprincess\u201d and the situation escalated to her crying about her work environment. The woman told investigators her boss insisted on meeting her at a hotel in Las Vegas, commenting on her clothing and asking if she had dressed nicely for him. She also reported that during a dinner in November, he told her he was \u201cin love\u201d with her and \u201cwanted to marry her\u201d and take care of her \u201cfinancially and professionally.\u201d On Tuesday, despite this and other situations the woman described, the independent investigator concluded there was no evidence of sexual harassment while acknowledging the boundary breaches included a \u201csubstantial disparity in age\u201d and an \u201cobvious power dynamic.\u201d Mark B. Rosenberg announced his resignation on Jan. 21. In his resignation letter, he attributed his decision to \u201crecurring personal health issues and to the deteriorating health\u201d of his wife. He later released a statement saying he had \u201cunintentionally created emotional (not physical) entanglement\u201d with an staffer as his wife was suffering from dementia and diabetes. Rosenberg, 72, got married in 1974 and he started teaching political science at in 1976. After working for the state, he returned to FIU. He started his service as the university\u2019s fifth president in 2009. His resignation was after the public research Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 2/8 university hired a law firm to look into the woman\u2019s allegations. Attorney Eric D. Isicoff, who has a commercial litigation practice in Miami, handled FIU\u2019s internal probe. The woman met Rosenberg while she was a student at and started working in his office in 2019, and as part of her job, she often went to dinners and games with Rosenberg, according to the report. The woman told Isicoff the relationship started to become uncomfortable in May when the president allegedly said her boyfriend was not \u201cgood enough.\u201d She told Isicoff, \u201che would not have lunch without her and started hugging her ... followed her ... took pictures of her,\u201d sent her romantic songs, and behaved like he \u201cwas offering to find her an apartment in Coral Gables and pay for it,\u201d according to Isicoff\u2019s report. Isicoff reported he found the woman to be \u201ccredible\u201d and reviewed all of the text messages between her and Rosenberg, which included a \u201cMissing you already!\u201d text from him. He concluded that although there was \u201cnothing that could be construed as constituting sexual harassment,\u201d the text messages \u201creveal an uncomfortable and inappropriate level of familiarity and informality.\u201d In a 15-page report provided to FIU\u2019s board of trustees, Isicoff concluded Rosenberg, now a tenured faculty member, was \u201cunprofessional,\u201d \u201ccrossed\u201d boundaries, and \u201cdisplayed extremely poor judgment.\u201d According to the report, it\u2019s up to the faculty advisory board to decide if will do anything further to deal with the findings. Read the full report below: Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 3/8 Download this 1 of 15 \ue9c6\ue9a2 Copyright 2022 by Local10.com - All rights reserved Sanela Sabovic Sanela Sabovic joined Local 10 News in September 2012 as an assignment editor and associate producer. In August 2015, she became a full-time reporter and fill-in traffic reporter. Sanela holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in communications with a concentration in radio, television and film from DePaul University. email facebook twitter Andrea Torres The Emmy Award-winning journalist joined the Local 10 News team in 2013. She wrote for the Miami Herald for more than 9 years and won a Green Eyeshade Award. email Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 4/8 Marketplace Sell Your Items - Free to List Visit Full Marketplace Duluth Trading Men's Button Mock-Neck Jacquard Fleece Sweats... $34 E. | sellwild.com Baby Female Border Collie Bicolor A. | sellwild.com GIFT: Apple AirPod 2nd Generation $100 W. | sellwild.com #1 3D Scanner Pop 3 $500 W. | sellwild.com Tom\u2019s Shoes 6.5 Silver /Rainbow $14 R. | sellwild.com Large Adidas Mens Black Pullover Hoodie Sweatshirt DQ3096 $24 B. | sellwild.com Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 5/8 Powered by Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 6/8 PINS! MOlife Goodyear blimp is ready for the Pro Bowl. Write Comment.. MOlife Marathon Weekend is half over- in days not distance. Write Comment.. Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 7/8 Listings Email Newsletters Feeds Closed Captioning / Audio Description Contact Us Careers at Terms of Use Privacy Policy Public File Applications Report Do Not Sell My Info 1.0 Host Exhibit Cookie Preferences If you need help with the Public File, call (954) 364-2526. Copyright \u00a9 2025 Local10.com is published by INC., a Berkshire Hathaway company Recommended Videos Advertisement This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link: Privacy Notice 2/22/25, 8:37 Sexual harassment probe: Ex president shows \u2018extremely poor judgment\u2019 8/8"} |
9,061 | Eugene Robert Anderson | Marietta College | [
"9061_101.pdf",
"9061_102.pdf",
"9061_103.pdf",
"9061_104.pdf",
"9061_105.pdf"
] | {"9061_101.pdf": "charges/article_8d2cbf06-1b30-540d-b783-a9f202138f1c.html Marietta professor convicted on slew of child porn charges Athens Staff Aug 26, 2002 -- The largest child pornography trial in Ohio history in terms of pornographic images has resulted in the conviction of a former Marietta College professor on 108 of 133 indictments. In Washington County Common Pleas Court on Friday, a seven-man, five-woman jury returned a guilty verdict Friday on 108 charges against Eugene Robert Anderson, 52, the former information technology director at Marietta College. All along, the case has been followed closely in Athens because a co-defendant of Anderson, the late Robert Sandford, worked as a computer engineer for Ohio University and allegedly committed related crimes from a computer on the Athens campus. Sandford died mysteriously last March of toxic poisoning from a chemical used to enhance the growth of plants. That case is still under investigation in Washington County. Anderson resigned his Marietta College position early in 2001, about a month after the Dec. 15, 2000 raid of his campus office and his home in Vienna, W.Va. He had been at the school since 1981. Judge Susan Boyer set Anderson's sentencing for Oct. 24. Had Anderson been convicted on all 138 original counts, he faced a maximum of 575 years in prison and a maximum fine of $1.1 million. Washington County Prosecutor Michael Spahr said he had not yet calculated the maximum sentence on the 108 conviction counts. Some of the counts carry a maximum one-year sentence and others four to 8 years, he said. Anderson was convicted on: 2/22/25, 8:38 Marietta professor convicted on slew of child porn charges | Local News | athensnews.com 1/4 * 36 counts of pandering sexually-oriented matter involving a minor; * 20 counts of complicity in pandering sexually-oriented matter involving a minor; * 14 counts of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material; * 28 counts of complicity in illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material; * Five counts of promoting prostitution; * Three counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor; * One count of unauthorized use of computer or telecommunications property; * One count of corrupting a minor. Anderson was found not guilty on 25 counts, and five others were dismissed during the three-week trial. Scott Longo of the Ohio Attorney General's Office served as lead prosecutor in the case. He said, to his knowledge, the Anderson trial was the largest ever in Ohio history with regard to the amount of pornographic materials involved and could conceivably be the largest ever in the nation. Longo, who works closely with the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and Identification's Computer Crimes Unit, was invited to lead the prosecution of the case because of his knowledge of computers and his close working relationship with the agents who would be testifying in the trial. \"My computer knowledge is somewhat limited,\" said Spahr know how to turn one on, turn one off, and do a little word processing. Given that the defendant in the case was an expert in computer technology, it made perfect sense to accept the attorney general's offer to have Mr. Longo come down here and lead the prosecution team.\" Still, it may have been Spahr's closing summation that swayed the jury. He likened Anderson's crime to a robber who walks into the bank and says to the teller, \"This isn't a bank robbery; it's a non-returnable loan.\" He characterized as \"bunk\" Anderson's \"blame it on the other guy\" defense, adding that by the very nature of his position as director of information technologies at Marietta College, Anderson knew what was going on. During the trial, Anderson's 2/22/25, 8:38 Marietta professor convicted on slew of child porn charges | Local News | athensnews.com 2/4 attorney, George Cosenza, had attempted to lay the blame on Sandford, a former colleague and lover of Anderson's, according to Anderson's testimony. \"That was his job. He had to know,\" Spahr said about Anderson, noting that he had done been in his position at Marietta College for 20 years. Throughout the three-week trial, defense attorney George Cosenza reiterated his opening argument -- that the images were placed on a secret server, computers, and discs by Sandford, a computer engineer at OU. The images, although erased from the computers, CDs and server, were retrieved through the use of special software that makes a mirror image of the original computer, including all deleted images. Sandford had worked for Anderson at Marietta College prior to taking a similar position at in 1999. That same year, Sandford installed a secret server, known as \"Caleb,\" on the Marietta College campus, to which only he and Anderson had access. Several months before his death in March, Sandford told officials that someone had attempted to poison him with a tainted batch of cookies left in his vehicle on Sandford's death found the presence of the plant fertilizer as well as rat poison, which was reported to have been in the batch of cookies. Washington County authorities have yet to release their final report on Sandford's death. Sandford's parents, who declined comment, sat in the back of the court throughout the three-week trial. Spahr praised the jury's diligence and attention to detail. He said he was concerned the jury wouild get confused by the technical aspects of the trial, but noted that they showed great attention to detail throughout the three-week trial. The jury, which began deliberations at 2:30 p.m. Thursday, was out for 9 1/2 hours before returning their verdict. It took nearly 45 minutes for bailiff Renee Marshall to read the verdict to the court. \"This person had been preying on young people for decades,\" Spahr told the media in a post-verdict press conference. \"He's been living in chat rooms, looking for young boys. He talked to them about things of a sexual nature that you can't even talk about on television or the radio. It was pretty digusting.\" 2/22/25, 8:38 Marietta professor convicted on slew of child porn charges | Local News | athensnews.com 3/4 Nearly 60 pornographic images were entered into evidence in the case, all of which depicted young boys in various sexual acts. In addition, several short pornographic movies were entered into evidence, all of which involved young boys engaged in sex acts. The state also retrieved some 8,000 chats in gay chat rooms where Anderson found some of his boys, and more than 150,000 pornographic images on a secret server on the Marietta College campus that was designed to pull such images off the Internet by the use of what computer experts called a \"robotic arm.\" The robot was programmed to exclusively pull out pornographic images, primarily those dealing with children. The court went through nearly 150 prospective jurors in the case, many of whom said they could not stomach seeing such pornographic images, before seating the jury after their verdict was released, as did the defendant. And Cosenza left the court immediately after the verdict and did not return media calls left at his Parkersburg office. Anderson faces similar charges in West Virginia in October. The Wood County Circuit Court returned an 86-count indictment against Anderson earlier this summer. Wood County Prosecutor Ginny Conley said the charges involve \"use, possession and distr 2/22/25, 8:38 Marietta professor convicted on slew of child porn charges | Local News | athensnews.com 4/4", "9061_102.pdf": "Parsons pleads guilty in former Marietta College professor\u2019s murder \u2014 The killer of a former Marietta College professor who was in prison on sex charges pleaded guilty to the murder Wednesday in Fayette County, W.Va. Timothy Parsons, 42, of Boone County, W.Va., was originally indicted in May on a first-degree murder charge for the death of Eugene Robert Anderson in January at the Mount Olive Correctional Complex in Fayette County. Anderson, 66, was 13 years into his sentence for more than 130 charges relating to child pornography and prostitution in Washington and Wood counties. He had yet to begin serving time on the most recent conviction of sexual abuse of two minors, to which he pleaded guilty in December of 2/22/25, 8:38 Parsons pleads guilty in former Marietta College professor\u2019s murder | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 1/4 2015 in Kanawha Circuit Court and was sentenced to a minimum additional 60 years in prison after the first 180 years for the previous cases. Formerly the director of information technology and an associate computer science professor at Marietta College, Anderson was first investigated in December of 2000 when substantial evidence led to search warrants for Anderson\u2019s residence in West Virginia, his car and office at Marietta College, officials said. Law enforcement seized computers and computer media containing more than 100,000 still images depicting children engaging in explicit sexual conduct, videos of the same and more than 8,000 chats between Anderson and both adult and juvenile males that showed Anderson was grooming further victims, officials said. Anderson was convicted of 108 child pornography and prostitution charges in Washington County, 22 charges in Wood County in 2003 and another 20 charges in Kanawha County in 2015. He was sentenced to a cumulative 240 years in prison. Parsons was serving two life sentences without a possibility of parole for killing his wife and mother-in-law and raping a 15-year-old girl after showing the child his wife and mother-in-law\u2019s bodies in May 2012. On Wednesday, Parsons pleaded guilty to one charge of second-degree murder and said in court that the reason he killed Anderson was because of a dispute over a Bible verse. \u201cHe said they had gotten into an argument over a Bible verse and even though Parsons was only eighth-grade educated, he was right about the scripture,\u201d said Fayette County Prosecutor Larry Harrah. \u201cApparently this upset Anderson, who thought as a (former) college professor he would know more than an eighth-grade level.\u201d According to Harrah, Parsons said in court Wednesday that Anderson \u201ctook a hit out on him\u201d and was willing to pay someone to take Parsons\u2019 life. 2/22/25, 8:38 Parsons pleads guilty in former Marietta College professor\u2019s murder | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 2/4 \u201cSo (Parsons) said he took matters into his own hands to get Anderson before he could get him,\u201d said Harrah. When Anderson was found dead in the recreational yard of the prison, authorities determined he was killed with a shiv. \u201cIt was on video and he confessed to it so it was a pretty easy case,\u201d said Harrah. \u201cThe judge could sentence him for any number of years between 10 and 40 and has the option to run his sentence concurrent or consecutively to the other life sentences.\u201d Harrah said before the plea agreement was finalized he tried to reach out to family of Anderson but could only find one relative. \u201cOn every case try to talk with the family about what we\u2019re doing with a plea but the only person that ever visited (Anderson) in prison was one first-cousin,\u201d said the prosecutor. \u201cHe didn\u2019t have anyone that cared.\u201d Parsons\u2019 sentencing on the new murder conviction will take place Sept. 7. Mount Olive, West Virginia\u2019s only maximum security facility, houses 1,100 inmates. It was immediately placed on lockdown after the stabbing in January but this wasn\u2019t the first nor was it the last time an inmate lost their life in the facility. On June 12, 2015, David Munday, 50, of Hedgesville, died after suffering some sort of \u201cmedical episode\u201d after attacking a counselor. On March 19, 2016, Russell L. Hager, 47 of Logan County, W.Va., died after being stabbed in the head and neck with a metal shank. On April 5, 2017, Earl Parsons, 30, of Huntington, died in a fight near his cell prison is basically a small city and they get a hold of things,\u201d said Paul Simmons, acting deputy commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Corrections. \u201cI\u2019ve seen improvised homemade pieces of whatever, broom handles, any piece of metal, toothbrushes, spoons. And a level five facility 2/22/25, 8:38 Parsons pleads guilty in former Marietta College professor\u2019s murder | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 3/4 is where you\u2019re more prone to have violence because that\u2019s the end of the line for security. It\u2019s where the most violent offenders go.\u201d Mount Olive is built in a butterfly pod-style with an open recreation yard in the center with mirrored living and work quarters on the sides. The facility has one mess hall for the general population of inmates and those in segregation are fed meals in their cells. \u201cWe end up having some offenders in there that may not be in for murder,\u201d said Simmons. \u201cBut if you can\u2019t behave in the lower levels that\u2019s where you go.\u201d Simmons said he was surprised by the murder of Anderson. \u201cHe\u2019d been there for a long time,\u201d he said. \u201cBut that\u2019s prison Today's breaking news and more in your inbox Email Address I'm interested in (please check all that apply) (Required) Daily Newsletter Breaking News Obituaries Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? (Required) Yes No 2/22/25, 8:38 Parsons pleads guilty in former Marietta College professor\u2019s murder | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 4/4", "9061_104.pdf": "17\u00b0 Huntington Flood Advisory Is In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 News Weather Latest Video \uf002 CHARLESTON, W.Va former Marietta College professor has been sentenced to at least 60 years in prison in West Virginia after pleading guilty to sexually abusing two boys in the late 1990s. 65-year-old Eugene Anderson pleaded guilty on Monday in Kanawha County Circuit Court to 10 sexual abuse counts and eight counts of third-degree assault. Judge Tod Kaufman agreed to Anderson's request for a maximum sentence. The sentence will run consecutive to lengthy sentences Anderson received in child pornography cases in West Virginia and Ohio more than a decade ago. While imprisoned in West Virginia, Anderson confessed to a state police trooper that he sexually abused a 13-year-old boy and a 14-year-old boy. He told Kaufman that these victims hadn't received justice. Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges gavel. (courtesy Online gavel. (courtesy Online) (KCRG) By The Assoicated Press Published: Dec. 15, 2015 at 10:09 Crossout | Sponsored Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now 2/22/25, 8:38 Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges 1/5 Most Read Camper Van Deals | Search ads | Sponsored Villas in Dubai | Search Ads | Sponsored Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Laser Cutting Machines | Sponsored dimmi-chi-chiama.it | Sponsored SearchPad | Sponsored Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now Step Into History At 9 Ancient Temples Around The World Book Your Low Priced Cruise (See Offers) Explore lowest priced offers today \uf144 Four new stores coming to Ashland Town Center \uf144 \u2018They are the most evil criminals on earth\u2019: Nearly 40 arrested in joint operation \uf144 Man arrested in sexual abuse cases from decades ago \uf057 2/22/25, 8:38 Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges 2/5 Latest News One lane reopen after Route 2 tanker crash \uf144 Hospital patient charged after \u2018brutally\u2019 attacking nurse, breaking \u2018every bone\u2019 in her face, deputies say \uf144 First flu-related pediatric death of the season reported in Ohio \uf144 Man arrested in deadly shooting 11-year-old girl dies by suicide after bullies threatened to call on her family Kentucky flooding death toll climbs to 20 First pediatric flu death reported in Ohio \uf057 2/22/25, 8:38 Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges 3/5 \uf144 \uf144 Staying alive in Division First Alert Forecast \uf144 oHIO \uf144 Weather Extra | Quiet for a change \uf144 \uf144 Logan County PSD\u2019s water tanks are working normally after flooding issues \uf144 Weather Extra | Quiet for a change \uf057 News Investigates Sports Tri-State Weather Lottery High School Scores Contact Us Dual Doppler Radar Hometown Hero 645 Fifth Avenue Huntington 25701 (304) 697-4780 2/22/25, 8:38 Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges 4/5 \uf057 Public Inspection File [email protected] - (304) 697-4780 Terms of Service Privacy Policy Applications Report Advertising Digital Marketing Closed Captioning/Audio Description At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 High School Sports Work for Weather Cams College Sports Advertise With Us Closings Ohio Lottery Pro Sports 2/22/25, 8:38 Former Marietta College prof sentenced on sex abuse charges 5/5", "9061_105.pdf": "Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison Convicted for child pornography, prostitution, abuse Former Marietta College professor Eugene Robert Anderson, sentenced to more than two centuries in prison on child pornography and prostitution charges in 2003, was killed Sunday in a West Virginia prison. (Photo Provided former Marietta College professor sentenced to more than two centuries in prison on child pornography and prostitution charges in 2/22/25, 8:39 Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 1/5 2003 was killed Sunday in a West Virginia prison. Eugene Robert Anderson, 66, was eight years into his sentence for more than 130 charges relating to child pornography and prostitution in Washington and Wood counties. He had yet to begin serving time on the most recent conviction of sexual abuse of two minors, to which he pleaded guilty in December 2015 in Kanawha Circuit Court and was sentenced to a minimum additional 60 years in prison after the first 180 years for the previous cases. Lawrence Messina, director of communications for the West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety, said the fatal incident occurred at the Mount Olive Correctional Complex. An open investigation by the West Virginia State Police continues into Anderson\u2019s death. \u201cThe facility will remain in lockdown as the state troopers do whatever they believe is prudent to investigate what happened,\u201d said Messina. Anderson was killed Sunday evening after an apparent assault by one or more fellow inmates. He was fatally injured around 6 p.m. in an outdoor recreation area and the facility was immediately placed on lockdown. Messina said a makeshift weapon had been recovered but no one has been charged. Lt. Michael Baylous, West Virginia State Police spokesman, said officers are still investigating and interviewing witnesses. 2/22/25, 8:39 Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 2/5 He said the plan at present is to complete the investigation and present the findings to the prosecuting attorney for presentation to a grand jury. Anderson\u2019s impact is one vividly remembered by officials in Washington County, more than a decade after he was convicted was just thinking about him the other day; he wasn\u2019t a rough and tough guy,\u201d recalled former Washington County Prosecutor Michael Spahr. \u201cAnderson was in his 50s when he was arrested and we tried him. He looked like a typical professor can\u2019t imagine him getting into a fight in prison.\u201d Retired Marietta Police Det. Sgt. Rick Meek said the investigation into Anderson began with an unrelated case of property crime in which the suspect, Jay Johnson, provided information on Anderson in exchange for a reduction of his charges. \u201cThat was certainly the catalyst,\u201d said Meek. \u201cSpahr sent him to me and (Johnson) told me that we should be looking at Anderson.\u201d Meek said law enforcement in Washington and Wood counties had suspected Anderson of improper conduct with minors for a while but had yet to find substantial evidence to open an investigation until December of 2000. The investigation led to search warrants for Anderson\u2019s residence in West Virginia and his car and office at Marietta College where officers seized items that included computers and computer media. More than 100,000 still images depicting children engaging in explicit sexual conduct were found, along with videos and more than 8,000 chats between Anderson and both adult and juvenile males. \u201cIt was really frustrating for us because the man was a computer genius and we had never dealt with a computer crime,\u201d said Alison Cauthorn, Washington County assistant prosecutor don\u2019t think this county had ever seen or has ever seen anything like it. The chats were extremely graphic and he talked about acts that he had engaged in and identified 2/22/25, 8:39 Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 3/5 himself as a professor at a liberal arts school interested in underage males.\u201d The joint investigation between local law enforcement agencies and the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation revealed not only the pornographic images, videos and online chats, but also the grooming and sexual interaction between Anderson and several minor males from the Parkersburg area. \u201cCases like this are always especially difficult,\u201d said Cauthorn. \u201cYoung men can have a more difficult time processing and discussing sexual abuse so getting folks to come forward was hard.\u201d Throughout the three-week trial of Anderson in August of 2003, the jury bore witness to several of the images, chats and first-person accounts of Anderson\u2019s actions. \u201cThe jury had to deliberate each count individually and they had to look at this child pornography he had downloaded,\u201d said Spahr. \u201cAnderson was very stoic throughout the whole trial and don\u2019t think he had any friends or family there.\u201d The death of Anderson came as a shock to those who worked on his case in Washington County, especially after the consecutive sentences were ordered. \u201cHe received what he deserved in sentencing; he preyed upon youth in our community and God only knows how deep those scars go,\u201d said Meek. Cauthorn recalled preparing for the original indictment throughout 2001 and said even her memory of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 is skewed because of it was working on identifying the pornographic images to use for that indictment with Sgt. Meek,\u201d she said. \u201cIt makes you numb. But once we knew we hit the first count and that the jury understood how serious the offenses were, we knew we had him.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:39 Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 4/5 Anderson was ultimately convicted of 108 child pornography and prostitution charges in Washington County, 22 charges in Wood County in 2003 and another 20 charges in Kanawha County in 2015. He was sentenced to a cumulative 240 years in prison. Anderson arrived at Mount Olive in July 2003. His parole hearing was scheduled for 2085 while a projected release date was 2148. He was formerly the director of information technology and an associate computer science professor at Marietta College. (Jess Mancini contributed to this story Today's breaking news and more in your inbox Email Address I'm interested in (please check all that apply) (Required) Daily Newsletter Breaking News Obituaries Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? (Required) Yes No 2/22/25, 8:39 Eugene Robert Anderson killed in prison | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel 5/5"} |
8,176 | Robert Peterson | Morehouse College | [
"8176_101.pdf",
"8176_102.pdf",
"8176_103.pdf"
] | {"8176_101.pdf": "Morehouse assistant professor Robert Peterson is accused of buying underage students alcoholic drinks, as well as groping one student's genitals during a study abroad trip 23, 2020 Morehouse College is facing accusations that it did nothing to come to the aid of a student who was allegedly being sexually harassed by a faculty member. According to a new lawsuit, the victim was a first-year student at the school when he participated in a study-abroad trip to Brazil in May 2015, at which time the alleged harassment began, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports. The student, who was a minor at the time, claims that assistant professor Robert Peterson ordered him alcoholic drinks on the flight to Brazil and then groped his genitals on the flight. Peterson allegedly ordered alcoholic beverages for other underage students at a pool party during the trip and also allegedly sent sexual images to the students. \u201cPeterson was known as a professor that exchanged good grades for sex,\u201d the complaint claims. Despite multiple Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment 18 1867 18, 2015 IMAGES) Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 1/8 reports on the professor\u2019s behavior, little was done. The reports: One faculty member reported the alleged harassment to a department chair, but it wasn\u2019t forwarded to the office assigned to handle such complaints. The student said he filed a formal complaint in December 2017, but Morehouse said it didn\u2019t receive the complaint. The student resubmitted the complaint in January. The student said his grades suffered and he left the school in the fall of 2017. He claimed that officials did little to assist him when he tried to return to school at the start of this semester. The student is now seeking unspecified monetary and punitive damages, per the lawsuit that was filed last week. Meanwhile, Peterson, the professor in question, has \u201cvehemently denied\u201d all allegations, according to AJC. The reports: Documents filed by the student\u2019s attorney said Peterson was put on administrative leave and an external investigator recommended termination Cynthia Erivo To Host The 78th Tony Awards At Radio City Mus Barbie And Black In Fashion Council Team Up On Partnership Inside The Black Beauty Club\u2019s Black Beauty Talks Event Wi The 8 Best Moments From Part One Of 'The Real Housewives of Delicious Black-Owned Sparkling Wines To Toast With Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 2/8 The has ordered institutions to stop using \u201cracial preferences\u201d in admissions, financial aid, hiring, or any other areas 19, 2025 The Trump administration has given schools and universities across the country just two weeks to eliminate diversity initiatives or risk losing federal funding. In a memo issued Friday, the U.S. Department of Education ordered institutions to stop using \u201cracial preferences\u201d in Department Of Education Gives Schools Two Weeks To Cut Porgrams Or Risk Losing Federal Funding SCHOOL. | LOCATION: TAMARAC, FLORIDA, USA. Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 3/8 admissions, financial aid, hiring, or any other areas. Schools have 14 days to eliminate any practice that considers race as a factor, a move that could dramatically reshape campus life. Educators across the country are scrambling to assess their risk, weighing whether to fight for policies they believe are legally sound. The sweeping directive could upend everything from college application essays to faculty hiring and student organizations. The memo frames the crackdown as an effort to combat discrimination.\u201cWith this guidance, the Trump Administration is directing schools to end the use of racial preferences and race stereotypes in their programs and activities\u2014a victory for justice, civil rights laws, and the Constitution,\u201d said Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor. \u201cSchools have been operating on the pretext that selecting students for \u2018diversity\u2019 or similar euphemisms is not selecting them based on race. No longer. Students should be assessed according to merit, accomplishment, and character\u2014not prejudged by the color of their skin,\u201d Trainor added. The backlash from civil rights groups and higher education leaders was swift. Many argue the vague language is designed to have a chilling effect, pressuring schools to abandon any programs touching on race\u2014even those that could hold up in court. \u201cCreating a sense of risk around doing work that might promote diverse and welcoming campuses is much more of the goal than a clear statement of existing law,\u201d Jonathan Fansmith, senior vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, an association of college presidents told the Associated Press. The directive builds on Trump\u2019s previous executive order banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs and cites the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that struck down race- conscious college admissions.\u201cPut simply, educational institutions may neither separate nor segregate students based on race, nor distribute benefits or burdens based on race,\u201d the memo states. The Education Department is also slashing $600 million in grants for teacher training programs that promote concepts like DEI, critical race theory and social justice activism, calling them \u201cdivisive.\u201d Uncertainty over how far this anti order will reach was evident during last week\u2019s confirmation hearing for education secretary nominee Linda McMahon. When asked whether Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 4/8 courses on African American history would violate the president\u2019s order, McMahon admitted she wasn\u2019t sure. Article continues after video. Despite the pressure, some education leaders are urging schools not to overreact. The School Superintendents Association has reminded members that the new guidance is not legally binding, and any funding cuts would require lengthy investigations. \u201cWe\u2019re not certain a district should do anything beyond reading the guidance, talking to their legal counsel, and gauging community interest in keeping existing programs,\u201d said Sasha Pudelski, the group\u2019s director of advocacy. At the heart of the memo is a direct challenge to college admissions policies. The guidance warns that schools cannot use essays as a way to infer an applicant\u2019s race\u2014a key concern since the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling left room for students to discuss race in personal statements. Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged this possibility but cautioned that colleges could not use essays as a loophole to achieve racial diversity. More Videos The Department of Education Extends Student Loan Legacy or Lose Is It Our Job to Educate White People About Racism? Tommy Is Losing It on \"Power Sign up for Newsletters to see more of Black Women\u2019s Boundlessness Email Address* The Department of Education Extends Student Loan Pay\u2026 The Department of Education Extends Student Loan Payment Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 5/8 The memo also targets schools that have eliminated standardized testing requirements. It argues that dropping and requirements to increase racial diversity is unlawful, even though many universities have moved away from standardized tests over concerns that they favor wealthy students. Longstanding practices\u2014such as recruiting in underrepresented areas or obtaining lists of potential students based on academic and demographic factors\u2014could now be seen as legal risks. Scholarships for students of specific racial backgrounds are also under scrutiny. While legal experts continue to debate whether the Supreme Court\u2019s decision extends to financial aid, some institutions have already removed racial criteria from certain scholarships. The National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators is working to understand the memo\u2019s implications. \u201cThe last thing students need when making plans about how to pay for college is uncertainty over when or whether they will receive financial aid they\u2019ve been relying on,\u201d the group said in a statement to the Associated Press. Trump has called for eliminating the Education Department altogether, and Elon Musk\u2019s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has already slashed dozens of federal contracts it deemed wasteful By clicking Subscribe Now, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy Diptyque Eau Rose Hair Mist Parfums de Marly Valaya Hair Perfume prev next Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 6/8 New Music This Week: Keke Palmer Fights \u201cImposter\u201d Syndr With \u2018Keep Your Wonder Moving,\u2019 Lindsay Adams Paints Bridal Bliss: Najie and Asher Celebrated Love And Caribbean Lori Harvey Partners With Elisa Johnson's Eyewear Brand On 9 Lifestyle Items You Need From Amazon\u2019s Presidents\u2019 Day... Our Company Customer Service Essence Ventures Change Your Address Contact Us Job Opportunities Internships Media Kit Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 7/8 ESSENCE.com is part of Communications, Inc. Essence may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice. \u00a92024 Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Essence.com Advertising Terms Home Love Celebrity Beauty Hair Fashion Festival of Culture Sign In 2/22/25, 8:39 Lawsuit Claims Morehouse College Ignored Student's Complaints Of Sexual Harassment - Essence | Essence 8/8", "8176_102.pdf": "r e e a s e v a l u a t i o n $ Student Sues Morehouse College 1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Suite #410 Washington 20036 24/7 Availability (202) 955-4529 [email protected] D.C. 202-955-4529 301-250-1957 703-548-4529 a 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 1/10 student has filed a lawsuit against Morehouse College, alleging that the administrators didn\u2019t address his sexual harassment complaints against an associate professor. According to the lawsuit, the sexual harassment began during a study-abroad trip to Brazil in May 2015. The student said professor Robert Peterson ordered him alcoholic drinks on the flight and touched his genitals. The lawsuit also alleges that Peterson ordered alcoholic beverages for other underage students at a pool party during the trip and sent sexually explicit photos to them. \u201cPeterson was known as a professor that exchanged good grades for sex,\u201d the lawsuit says faculty member informed a department chair about the incident, but it was never sent to the office that deals with complaints like that. The student claimed he set a formal complaint in December 2017, but the school said it never received it. He sent in another complaint in January. Peterson was put on administrative leave and now no longer teaches at Morehouse College. He has continuously denied the allegations against him. The student said his grades started to suffer and he left the school in the fall of 2017. When he tried to return at the beginning of this 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 2/10 semester, administrators did little to help him. He is asking for unspecified monetary and punitive damages from the lawsuit. Unfortunately, this isn\u2019t the first time a professor has been accused of sexual harassment. Since August, Vanderbilt University professor David Sweatt has been on leave as the university investigates sexual assault claims made by a student. Sweatt allegedly drugged and sexually assaulted a student at a conference in 2015. The school found out about the accusations in 2017, but said there wasn\u2019t enough evidence for action at the time. In August 2018, the university was provided with additional information about the alleged assault that warranted an official investigation. To read more news stories on a wide range of topics, check out the news feed at Cohen & Cohen 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 3/10 Injury Attorneys \u2013 Get the Compensation You Deserve! Whether you have been injured in a car accident, a malpractice victim CASE! Watch Video 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 4/10 injured on the job, as the result of shoddy craftsmanship, or in a slip and fall, we can help! Our experienced, competent attorneys excel in all areas of personal injury law 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Our team is available and ready to help you with your case. Feel free to contact us via the form below or call us 24/7 at 202-955-4529 Your Name Your Email 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 5/10 Your Phone How Were You Injured \"The legal team at Cohen & Cohen did a great job really appreciate the hard work on gating my compensation in a fair amount of time. Special thanks to Kris for a wonderful job.\" Jose Rivera had a great experience with the team at Cohen & Cohen. From my intake attorney, Adam, to the paralegal, Bryan, who worked with me regularly for months to document and prepare my case, to Jill, the attorney who secured my settlement feel fortunate to have had their representation and expertise on my side.\" Lea Harvey Common Types of Compensation For Common Types of Compensation For Personal Injury Personal Injury 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 6/10 Read more Illinois Attorney General Sues Suburban Bus Company Over Alleged Discrimination The Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed... read more Parkland Massacre Survivors Sue County for Allegedly Violating Their Civil Rights Several Parkland, Fla. shooting survivors have... read more Family of Boy Shot Dead for Holding a Toy Gun File Lawsuit The family members of a 13-year-old boy who was killed by Sonoma... read more 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 7/10 Washington DC, Maryland, Virginia Find a Car Accident Lawyer Near Me As referenced in this site, Cohen, Stanley, Leighton and Rodney refers to the \u201cdoing business as\u201d designation. The legal name of this entity is Cohen, Stanley, Leighton and Rodney, PC. Some images on this site may be stock images, including those of individuals \u203a Our Team \u203a Services \u203a Press \u203a Testimonials \u203a Personal Injury Blog \u203a Jury Instructions \u203a Sitemap \u203a Accessibility Our Team Press Room Our Services Testimonials 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 8/10 If you need a car accident lawyer, we are here to help. Call us 24/7 at (202) 955-4529 (DC), (301) 250-1957 (MD), or (703) 548-4529 (VA). Personal Injury Blog Jury Instructions Sitemap Accessibility Personal Injury Lawyer Car Accident Lawyer Truck Accident Lawyer Motorcycle Accidents Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Birth Injury Dog Bite Construction Accidents Train Accidents 1730 Rhode Island Avenue Suite #410 Washington, D.C. 20036 (At the corner of Rhode Island and Connecticut Ave, NW) 24/7 Availability (202) 955-4529 [email protected] 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 9/10 Other Resources Car Accident Lawyer \u00a9 2025 Cohen & Cohen | Disclaimer 2/22/25, 8:39 Student Sues Morehouse College - Washington Injury Attorneys 10/10", "8176_103.pdf": "Morehouse investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean By Mark Strassmann July 22, 2019 / 6:51 News Atlanta \u2014 An assistant dean at Morehouse College is under investigation for sexual misconduct. Students posted their complaints on social media and one said officials at the school ignored his allegations. Michael Key's tweeted allegations rocked all-male Morehouse College. In the post, Key accused DeMarcus Crews, an assistant dean and student housing director, of repeated unwanted touching \u2014 including pinching \u2014 and sexual comments Full Episodes Eye On America On the Road Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:39 Morehouse College: School investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean DeMarcus Crews - C\u2026 1/5 \"He always targets freshman see it every day and it just sickens me,\" Key said. \"It is very predatory.\" Key said Morehouse never followed up when he complained in January of 2018. Another Morehouse student retweeted Key's allegations with his own complaints. Morehouse put Crews on unpaid administrative leave and said it's investigating. Key complained through the Department of Education's Title office. It has 372 ongoing investigations into sexual harassment and sexual violence on college campuses nationwide. One case involved Robert Peterson, a former Morehouse sociology professor student complained that Peterson gave him alcohol and groped him on a school Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:39 Morehouse College: School investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean DeMarcus Crews - C\u2026 2/5 \u00a9 2019 Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. trip to Brazil in 2015. He's angry with Morehouse too, but wants to remain anonymous. \"They were aware of me getting sexually assaulted and they did nothing about it,\" said the student, who is represented by attorney Cade Parian. Peterson denied the allegations. But Crews did not respond to News. Morehouse said it will \"take the necessary action to protect the safety of its students.\" Meanwhile, Key left Morehouse and is looking for a new college. In: Morehouse College Mark Strassmann Mark Strassmann is News' senior national correspondent based in Atlanta. He covers a wide range of stories, including space exploration. Strassmann is also the senior national correspondent for \"Face the Nation.\" More from News How Trump's layoffs upended one probationary staffer's life Amid Navy's demand for subs, recruitment efforts for shipbuilders begins in schools Virginia county balances economic benefits of data centers with drawbacks Immigration judge among 20 fired by Trump says \"caseload will balloon\" Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:39 Morehouse College: School investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean DeMarcus Crews - C\u2026 3/5 Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Join new Free to Play War Thunder Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy.\u2026 Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This Box, We Explain! Why You Should Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Crossout: New Apocalyptic Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy.\u2026 Top Packaging Trends In 2024 - Take Look Search Now Book Your Low Priced Cruise (See Offers) Explore lowest priced offers today. Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Quote Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:39 Morehouse College: School investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean DeMarcus Crews - C\u2026 4/5 Copyright \u00a92025 Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy Cookie Details Terms of Use About Advertise Closed Captioning News Store Site Map Contact Us Help Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now 14 Unique Cat Breeds You Don't See Everyday Watch News 2/22/25, 8:39 Morehouse College: School investigating allegations of \"predatory\" sexual misconduct against assistant dean DeMarcus Crews - C\u2026 5/5"} |
8,220 | Mohamed Muqtar | University of California – Berkeley | [
"8220_101.pdf",
"8220_102.pdf",
"8220_103.pdf",
"8220_104.pdf",
"8220_105.pdf",
"8220_106.pdf"
] | {"8220_101.pdf": "'Wholly unacceptable': Former Cal Athletics employee guilty of sex misconduct, report says By Christie Aguilar May 17, 2018 Mohamed Muqtar, a former Cal Athletics employee, was found to have violated Berkeley\u2019s sexual violence and sexual harassment policy, according to an internal investigation. In mid- January, former Cal women\u2019s basketball player and current player Layshia Clarendon filed a lawsuit against the Board of Regents, alleging that she was sexually assaulted by Muqtar. An investigation, which is now closed, was then launched by the campus\u2019s Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination.Muqtar has been terminated from his position as of May 11, 2018, according to a statement from Cal Athletics. He \u201cwas found to have violated the university\u2019s sexual violence and sexual harassment policy, involving several former student-athletes,\u201d the statement said total of seven women alleged abuse by Muqtar, with claims dating back nearly 20 years, but Clarendon\u2019s case has received the most publicity.In its statement, Cal Athletics called the report\u2019s findings \u201cappalling\u201d and \u201cwholly unacceptable,\u201d adding that such misconduct has \u201cno place\u201d on campus.\u201cOur primary goal as an athletic department is to support and provide an outstanding student-athlete experience, and it pains us to hear about these actions by one of our employees who student-athletes turned to as a trusted adviser,\u201d Cal Athletics said in the statement. 2/22/25, 8:40 'Wholly unacceptable': Former Cal Athletics employee guilty of sex misconduct, report says | Archives | dailycal.org 1/1", "8220_102.pdf": "Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating By Miranda Leitsinger Mar 21, 2019 Save Article Donate 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 1/7 general view of the sunset during the Colorado Buffaloes game against the California Golden Bears at California Memorial Stadium on November 24, 2018, in Berkeley. (Ezra Shaw/Getty Images Berkeley officials said Thursday they\u2019re investigating allegations that football coaches and athletes harassed a female student working for the team. 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 2/7 The woman shared her accusations in a public post on Facebook on Wednesday, alleging that a coach tried to force her to have sex with him, saying will get you fired if you do not have sex with me.\u201d Another coach followed her home, telling her she \u201cwould look amazing in a bikini,\u201d she wrote. She identified herself as Paige Cornelius and also detailed constant harassment on the field and on social media. Cornelius, who said she was on the sports medicine squad, did not respond to requests for comment does not normally name alleged survivors of sexual assault but decided to do so since Cornelius has shared her story publicly on social media. Cornelius said the harassment began on her first day on the job. Sponsored #MeToo Unmasks the Open Secret of Sexual Abuse in Yoga Investigation of Famed S.F. Yoga Teacher Carries On, Despite Resignation Amid Sexual Misconduct Allegations 'Lead by Example,' Says California Professor Who Has Accused Virginia's Fairfax of Sexual Assault 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 3/7 \u201cHours after practice my Instagram begins to blow up, DM\u2019s with creepy messages, asking me to come over, inviting me to parties. I\u2019m in college this is normal, or what has been normalized, and expected to get this from the players,\u201d she wrote in her Facebook post. \u201cWhat did not expect was the ruthless, endless, and persistent sex harassment from the coaches.\u201d That harassment allegedly included coaches staring at her body, a coach asking her personal questions, like whether she had a boyfriend and what her \u201ctype\u201d was, and players and staff sending her messages on social media or via text. Cornelius said she withdrew from school in March to seek therapy for post-traumatic stress she suffered as a result of her experience working for the team. She said she had reached out to Head Coach Justin Wilcox and Athletic Director Jim Knowlton, as well as other coaches and athletic administrators about the alleged harassment, but had not gotten a response. \u2018What did not expect was the ruthless, endless, and persistent sex harassment from the coaches.\u2019 \u2014Student who worked on the Cal Football team Cal Athletics said it has sent Cornelius\u2019 allegations to the campus Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination, which is responsible for investigating such accusations. \u201cThese allegations go against the very core of our values,\u201d Cal Athletics said in a statement. \u201cCal Athletics is and will always be committed to fostering a culture where everyone feels safe, welcome and respected. All of those associated with the department are expected to maintain ethical standards at all times.\u201d Knowlton said his department would lend its full backing to the campus inquiry into the allegations and would support any \u201cappropriate consequences as required by the outcome\u201d of it. \u201cThese allegations are surfacing in the midst of a concerted and ongoing effort across our department that began several years ago to educate and engage our staff and student\u2010athletes about preventing and responding to sexual harassment and violence,\u201d he said in a statement. \u201cThrough formal training sessions for coaches, staff and student\u2010athletes, we have been clear and consistent about our refusal to tolerate this most egregious form of misconduct. If necessary, we will do more.\u201d Stanford Law Professor Deborah Rhode said those efforts don\u2019t appear to be adequate. 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 4/7 \u201cThe message hasn\u2019t filtered down.What you need is cultural change.If these allegations are anywhere close to truth, this is not one bad apple,\u201d she said. Last year Berkeley fired an assistant director in its athletics department, Mohamed Muqtar, after an internal investigation substantiated claims of sexual violence and harassment brought by seven women athletes, including All-Star Layshia Clarendon and The (San Jose) Mercury News reported News\u2019 reporter Peter Jon Shuler contributed to this report. Stay in touch. Sign up for our daily newsletter. California News Fears for the Feds: San Diego Prosecutors Who Aided J6 Cases Face Trump Trouble His daughter has an ultra-rare genetic disorder. His push to treat it just hit a major milestone National Marine Sanctuary is almost here Email Address: Sign Up 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 5/7 To learn more about how we use your information, please read our privacy policy Radio Podcasts Events Newsletters Mobile Apps For Educators For TV/Film Producers News Science Arts & Culture Technology Labor Crossword Donate Help Center About Staff Report Careers Accessibility Corporate Sponsorship Financial and Files Contact Us Copyright \u00a9 2025 Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service Privacy Policy 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 6/7 2/22/25, 8:40 Student Alleges Cal Football Coaches Sexually Harassed Her Berkeley Investigating 7/7", "8220_103.pdf": "Cal report substantiates claims of sexual harassment 7y - Kate Fagan Women's Power Rankings: Notre Dame takes over the No. 1 spot 3d - Michael Voepel Beck, Cavinder luxury cars stolen; man arrested 20h - Andrea Adelson Texas coach Schaefer receives 3-year extension 2d Watkins' 28, Iriafen's double-double key win 2d Shirley 2nd women's coach to reach 900 wins 3d Irish top women's poll for 1st time since 2019 5d UConn stops Gamecocks' home win streak at 71 6d - Alexa Philippou Vandy's Blakes nets 55, sets freshman mark 6d South Carolina has work to do, UConn is back as a title contender and Texas might be the hottest team of all 5d - Michael Voepel, +2 More How a wild week shook up the women's Top 25 -- and what comes next 5d Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against ex- athletic department employee 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 1/9 Love, Abby: The forever friendship between the UConn Huskies and one magical fan Share An internal investigation by the University of California-Berkeley has substantiated claims of sexual violence and harassment against longtime athletic department employee Mohamed Muqtar. On April 17, Cal sent copies of the finished report to the seven women, all former Cal student-athletes, who claimed abuse by Muqtar dating back nearly 20 years. Among the women is current All-Star Layshia Clarendon, whose lawsuit filed in January jump-started the school's investigation into Muqtar. Clarendon's accusations against Muqtar include a physical assault in 2009-10, during her freshman year at Cal, when she was 18 years old copy of the report was also sent to the Cal athletic department by deputy Title compliance officer Yohance Edwards. When reached by ESPN, Cal Athletics confirmed that it had fired Muqtar, effective May 11, and offered the following explanation: \"Our primary goal as an athletic department is to support and provide an outstanding student- athlete experience, and it pains us to hear about these actions by one of our employees who they turned to as a trusted adviser. The findings described in the report are appalling, wholly unacceptable and have no place in our department, on campus or anywhere.\" Kate Fagan May 16, 2018, 08:31 Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 2/9 The report, obtained by ESPN, said the investigation was conducted by an outside investigator for Cal's Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination (OPHD). According to the report, \"Based on consideration of [Cal's sexual harassment and sexual violence policy] and the relevant information gathered through the investigation ... the investigator found that the conduct as described ... is and that [Muqtar] is therefore for a violation of the policies.\" The report addressed complaints made by seven women. In the document, Muqtar's name is redacted, and he is listed as \"respondent.\" When contacted by ESPN, four of the complainants confirmed that the redacted name, the \"respondent,\" was Muqtar. When reached on his cellphone in January, Muqtar said he had \"no comment\" on Clarendon's pending lawsuit and immediately hung up. Repeated calls to the same cellphone number this week went straight to voicemail. Muqtar was initially put on investigatory leave on Dec. 12, 2017, after the school was notified of Clarendon's pending lawsuit, which claims negligence on the part of the regents who oversee Cal. Muqtar, 61, was directed to have no contact with former or present Cal student-athletes or recruits and was ordered to not enter the school's athletic facilities without permission. According to the report, the athletic department had until the end of May -- 40 days from the delivery of the internal investigation report -- to implement a decision on the employment status of Muqtar, who is the assistant athletic director for student services. He started work in the athletic department nearly 25 years ago. Separately, on May 4, Alameda County Superior Court threw out Clarendon's civil lawsuit against Cal because the statute of limitations had expired. In California, the statute of limitations in cases of personal injury for someone 18 years or older is two years. Jennifer Bandlow, Clarendon's lawyer, said they would appeal the ruling, contending that in Clarendon's case, the clock on the statute of limitations shouldn't have started because her injuries did not manifest immediately. In fact, according to Bandlow, Clarendon did not begin to understand the alleged assault and its implications until she started therapy in 2017. \"Ms. Clarendon was assaulted in 2009 when she was 18 years old, and like many survivors, her psychological harm from the assault did not manifest until years later, in 2017,\" Bandlow said. \"This ruling effectively bars Ms. Clarendon, and others like her, from seeking civil redress of her psychological injuries.\" Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 3/9 Outside the Lines has spoken at length with Clarendon, as well as with nearly a dozen other former Cal student-athletes and administrators, about their experiences with Muqtar. Many spoke on the record and are willing to put their names to their experiences. In total, the women paint a picture of someone they initially saw as a father figure and whom the Cal athletic department billed as a mentor and friend -- a man who gradually earned, then shattered, their trust. The question of what Cal Athletics knew about Muqtar's behavior over the course of his nearly 25-year employment is still unanswered. Nearly all of the women spoke with expressed incredulity at the possibility that everyone in the athletic department was in the dark, labeling Muqtar's behavior an \"open secret.\" For its part, Cal Athletics said it aimed to get to the bottom of this important question, offering the following: \"Regarding whether we should have known about such allegations sooner, that is something we want to know and are looking into in order to gain an understanding of what did or did not occur previously.\" *** Clarendon started at Cal in 2009. Raised in San Bernardino, California, she chose Cal because it \"just felt like home. It was the one place that felt like, when stepped on campus, it was so eclectic and different.\" Atlanta Dream guard Layshia Clarendon, a member of the Cal women's basketball team from 2009 to 2013, says she was sexually harassed by an athletic department employee her freshman year. Getty Images Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 4/9 Like many Cal student-athletes, Clarendon was introduced to Muqtar on her recruiting visit. Once officially on campus, she began stopping by his office and hanging with him, as did so many of Cal's student-athletes. According to Clarendon, as well as the other former student-athletes, Cal positioned Muqtar as the hub of the athletic community: He was well-connected, friends with famous Cal alumni such as former star Jason Kidd and current quarterback Aaron Rodgers. \"He was just the mayor in that way like he knew everyone ... he made you feel good about yourself and made you feel like you were important when you were around him,\" Clarendon said. Technically, Muqtar was in charge of ensuring that student-athletes received their books. But according to Clarendon, student-athletes would often joke that they weren't sure what Muqtar's role was -- besides hanging out with student-athletes in his office and in coffeehouses just off campus. He was a long-tenured member of the Cal athletic department yet never elevated past a midlevel position. Muqtar's former office in Haas Pavilion, which houses much of the athletic department, was situated between the men's and women's basketball facilities, making it a natural gathering place. But former Cal student-athletes say his appeal was more than proximity: He was charming, close with all of Cal's high-profile athletes and donors, and the athletic department allegedly leaned on him to \"grease the wheels\" with football and men's basketball recruits. One current employee of the Cal athletic department, who requested anonymity because of employment status, openly wondered why Muqtar was allowed to spend much of his time in coffeehouses, socializing with student-athletes. This employee said the answer was always, \"That's just Mo Former Cal player alleges sexual assault in suit 7y \u2022 Kate Fagan Athletes say 'me too' \ue085 7y star Stewart was molested as a child 7y Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 5/9 Muqtar's office was often filled with athletes, and Clarendon says she was frequently one of them during her freshman year. Soon, she was meeting Muqtar off campus, along with other student-athletes, for pizza. Muqtar, Clarendon says, would either get the meals comped by the restaurant or pick up the tab. (Both are violations of rules.) The more time Clarendon and Muqtar spent together, the more Muqtar allegedly began steering the conversation into more sexual territory. \"There were times he would talk about inappropriate things, but at the moment, that felt like me talking to my friend, talking to someone could trust,\" Clarendon said. \"So discussions about sex or who are you dating and what are you guys doing when you engage in sex ... looking back now realize that's very manipulative, and that was him opening the door, like slowly but surely gaining more and more of my trust.\" When asked about the possibility that Muqtar, in addition to his other alleged behavior, also violated rules, Cal responded, \"The does provide some flexibility for coaches and staff to buy occasional meals for student-athletes. We have no reason to believe that meals were any more than occasional. Staff are expected to maintain ethical conduct at all times.\" But according to Clarendon, one night during her freshman year, Muqtar invited her back to his apartment to watch a music video. While there, Clarendon excused herself to the bathroom. She says Muqtar walked in on her, pinned her against the wall and digitally penetrated her. Clarendon remembers requesting to leave his apartment immediately after and Muqtar driving her home. While at Cal, Clarendon says, she never told anyone what happened. Only years later, in therapy, while playing for the WNBA's Atlanta Dream, did she begin processing the alleged assault, she says. In April 2017, she penned an essay for Mic titled, \"As a sexual assault survivor walked alone in my shame for years.\" Then, in January, she filed the aforementioned lawsuit, which also names Muqtar as a defendant have to regain my life back, in so many ways,\" Clarendon said. \"Because of this one incident that someone took, this one moment and don't remember how long it lasted -- but it doesn't matter. It's the violation of my body, my spirit and the person am.\" When asked why she filed suit this year, Clarendon said it was because she doesn't want to have to be a stranger to Cal anymore: \"It puts all the onus on me to avoid Cal and to avoid the spaces that I've lived in, where I've worked so hard to become a college athlete and worked so hard to get a degree from here and so hard to go to the Final Four. Now this is a Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 6/9 space that doesn't feel like it's my own anymore. It feels like something that was taken from me.\" Clarendon also felt compelled to protect other young student-athletes, those just stepping on the Cal campus, from her alleged experience. And, according to the eight other former Cal female athletes who were contacted by OTL, Clarendon's concern was valid. Many recalled similar experiences with Muqtar and were willing to tell their stories. According to these interviews, Muqtar's alleged behavior ranged from harassment -- including late-night phone calls during which the women interviewed believed he was masturbating -- to physical assault. Most stories had a similar pattern: a period of grooming followed by casual inquiries into sexual activity, late-night calls, masturbation (over the phone and in his office, with the door closed) and sometimes escalation to physical assault. Tess McCoy (n\u00e9e Zatica) played volleyball for Cal from 1999 to 2004. According to McCoy, older teammates now remember being warned by previous teammates to \"stay away from Muqtar.\" But that whisper network did not reach McCoy's class. Her allegations about Muqtar mirror that of so many others, including inappropriate sexual discussion and late- night calls. One night, McCoy says, she even found herself at Muqtar's apartment. When he began rubbing her shoulders, she immediately left without saying anything. She never reported the interaction. Another former Cal student, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic, described how, over the course of several months, Muqtar took her under his wing. Then, one evening while he was giving her a ride in his car, he allegedly began moving his hand toward his crotch and said think about these female athletes, and my d--- gets hard,\" according to the former student. She took this as an overture and immediately got out of the car former women's basketball player, who requested anonymity on behalf of her family, alleges that Muqtar frequently called her late at night to discuss sex. He also allegedly masturbated in front of her while in his office at Haas Pavilion. Kristy Patterson (n\u00e9e Begin) was a swimmer at Cal during the 1999-2000 season. Her swimming career was cut short because of three shoulder surgeries, and it was during this difficult period that she started spending more time with Muqtar. \"His M.O. was to prey on those who were vulnerable,\" she said. Patterson wrote a letter this month to Jay Larson, Cal's senior associate athletic director of compliance and Muqtar's former supervisor. In the letter, which was obtained by OTL, she included the following description of Muqtar's alleged behavior: \"He played puppet-master with personal relationships had with other Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 7/9 fellow student-athletes. He set up his prey by using other athletes as bait, falsely spreading rumors, upset those involved and would strike when the chaos level was just right. ... He would call me late at night and ask me to give him details about how liked to have sex, what like to have done to me, and details about my partner and their body parts.\" Continued Patterson in the letter: \"This entire situation should be an embarrassment to the Regents, and the University of Cal athletic department. Failing to recognize inappropriate relationships with athletes by its employees and failing to listen to prior complaints about Mohamed is completely unacceptable.\" One such prior complaint came from swimmer Jenna Rais, who competed for Cal from 2001 to 2004 and who says she noticed allegedly troubling behavior by Muqtar. On Jan. 13, 2010 -- during Clarendon's freshman year -- Rais sent an email to, among other top athletic department officials, then-Cal chancellor Robert Birgeneau and then-athletic director Sandy Barbour. Within that email, which was obtained by and which focused on detailing a separate issue, Rais warned of Muqtar's alleged behavior. She said Muqtar \"physically harassed\" her in his office and \"displayed verbally harassing and inappropriate behavior,\" according to the email. In addition, a former Cal instructor who frequently worked with student-athletes said that numerous student-athletes confided in her about what they alleged was inappropriate behavior by Muqtar. During her tenure, the instructor said, she twice approached athletic department officials -- in 2006 and 2007 -- with concerns about Muqtar. On both occasions, the instructor said she was told nothing could be done unless the women were willing to come forward with details. She spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect the women who confided in her. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 8/9 Many of the women who spoke on the record to Outside the Lines suggested that they have been in touch with numerous additional student-athletes -- both current and former -- who are not yet ready to speak openly about Muqtar. Clarendon, for her part, says her main objective in filing the lawsuit and speaking publicly is to prevent any future student- athletes from enduring similar harm don't want it to be real,\" Clarendon said don't want to acknowledge it even remember how hard it was to write those words: I'm a sexual assault survivor. These words still don't feel like my own. And this is the hardest thing I've had to do.\" Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:40 Cal report substantiates star Layshia Clarendon's sexual harassment claims against former athletic department employee - \u2026 9/9", "8220_104.pdf": "( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 1/79 Mohamed Muqtar is one of 262 celebrities, politicians, CEOs, and others who have been accused of sexual misconduct since April 2017 DOM\u00cdNGUEZ C\u00c1RDENAS D\u00cdAZ 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 2/79 Updated: Jan. 9, 2019 Update July 16, 2021: This list was created in 2017 as a way to represent the scope of the Me Too movement. Though the list, compiled from news reports, could never be exhaustive, the goal was to document the range of people across industries who were the subject of sexual misconduct reports. The list was updated periodically until February 2020; it has not been updated since then. In the intervening period, some of the people on this list have faced legal or professional consequences, while in other cases, further action was not supported or taken. While the Me Too movement continues to have an impact, this list is not an ongoing record of allegations and their outcomes; rather, it is meant as a snapshot of a particular moment in time. The list was updated periodically until February 2020, and is no longer being updated regularly. Harvey Weinstein. Mario Batali. Louis C.K. As the Me Too movement gained prominence, more than 250 powerful people \u2014 celebrities ( spacey-sexual-assault-allegations-house-of-cards), politicians ( moore-republican-party), CEOs ( sexual-misconduct-terdema-ussery-earl-k-sneed-mark-cuban), and others \u2014 were the subject of sexual harassment ( politics/2017/4/19/15361182/bill-oreilly-fox-harassment-allegations-fired), assault ( weinstein-sexual-harassment-assault-accusations), or other misconduct ( thrush-new-york-times) allegations. At the movement\u2019s height, more survivors came forward nearly every day, many of them inspired and emboldened by those who had gone before. Vox compiled a list of influential people from a variety of industries who faced new public accusations of sexual misconduct after Fox News host Bill O\u2019Reilly was forced to resign in April 2017. The list was updated periodically until January 2019, and is no longer being updated regularly. We decided to start our list with O\u2019Reilly because his departure from Fox helped set the stage for reports against Harvey Weinstein \u2014 which, in turn, helped raise awareness around the Me Too movement ( harvey-weinstein-harassment-assault) and kick off the reckoning around sexual misconduct that continues to this day, in Hollywood ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 3/79 harassment-hollywood-metoo), Washington ( and-politics/2018/1/30/16933376/congress-sexual-harassment-fix-bill), and around the country. Many (though not all) of the people accused have denied the allegations. Some say the reported behavior never happened, while others argue that their behavior was not intended to be sexual. Those who reported they were harassed, assaulted, or subjected to misconduct, however, have often said it affected them deeply, leaving some with lasting trauma and sometimes forcing them from their chosen careers. The Me Too movement and its impact ( movement-sexual-harassment-law-2019) are ongoing, and the list below is only a snapshot of the allegations that became public during a particular moment in time. Click to view the accused in the following fields: Arts & Entertainment 101 Media 57 Business & Tech 18 Politics 46 Other 40 Arts & Entertainment There are 101 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported December 2018 Frankie Shaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/frankie-shaw) Michael Weatherly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-weatherly) September 2018 Steven Wilder Striegel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steven-wilder-striegel) August 2018 Gerard Depardieu (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/gerard-depardieu) Chase Finlay (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chase-finlay) Asia Argento (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/asia-argento) July 2018 Rick Day (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rick-day) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 4/79 June 2018 Chris Hardwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-hardwick) May 2018 Morgan Freeman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/morgan-freeman) Luc Besson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/luc-besson) Boyd Tinsley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/boyd-tinsley) Ameer Vann (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ameer-vann) Junot D\u00edaz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/junot-diaz) April 2018 Allison Mack (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/allison-mack) Nicholas Nixon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nicholas-nixon) March 2018 John Kricfalusi (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-kricfalusi) Sherman Alexie (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sherman-alexie) February 2018 Jeff Franklin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff-franklin) Philip Berk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/philip-berk) Daniel Handler (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/daniel-handler) Patrick Demarchelier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-demarchelier) Seth Sabal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/seth-sabal) Andre Passos (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andre-passos) Greg Kadel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/greg-kadel) David Bellemere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-bellemere) Karl Templer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/karl-templer) Vincent Cirrincione (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/vincent-cirrincione) Paul Marciano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-marciano) January 2018 Charlie Walk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-walk) Scott Baio (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/scott-baio) David Copperfield (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-copperfield) Barry Lubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/barry-lubin) Michael Douglas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-douglas) Joel Kramer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/joel-kramer) Bruce Weber (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bruce-weber) Mario Testino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mario-testino) Aziz Ansari (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/aziz-ansari) James Franco (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-franco) Stan Lee (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/stan-lee) Ben Vereen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ben-vereen) Paul Haggis (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-haggis) Albert Schultz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/albert-schultz) Dan Harmon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dan-harmon) December 2017 Dustin Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dustin-marshall) T.J. Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-j-miller) Morgan Spurlock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/morgan-spurlock) Jon Heely (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jon-heely) Melanie Martinez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/melanie-martinez) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 5/79 Bryan Singer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bryan-singer) Peter Martins (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/peter-martins) James Levine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-levine) November 2017 Israel Horovitz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/israel-horovitz) Geoffrey Rush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/geoffrey-rush) Jean-Claude Arnault (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jean-claude-arnault) John Lasseter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-lasseter) Murray Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/murray-miller) Sylvester Stallone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sylvester-stallone) Ron Jeremy (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron-jeremy) Andy Henry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-henry) Jesse Lacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jesse-lacey) Tom Sizemore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-sizemore) Mark Schwahn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-schwahn) Peter Aalb\u00e6k Jensen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/peter-aalbaek-jensen) Eddie Berganza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eddie-berganza) Richard Dreyfuss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/richard-dreyfuss) Gary Goddard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/gary-goddard) Andrew Kreisberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrew-kreisberg) George Takei (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-takei) Steven Seagal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steven-seagal) Louis C.K. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/louis-c-k) Matthew Weiner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matthew-weiner) Russell Simmons (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/russell-simmons) Robert Knepper (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-knepper) Jeffrey Tambor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeffrey-tambor) Ed Westwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-westwick) Adam Venit (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/adam-venit) Danny Masterson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/danny-masterson) Nick Carter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nick-carter) Brett Ratner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brett-ratner) Dustin Hoffman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dustin-hoffman) October 2017 Andy Dick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-dick) Jeremy Piven (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeremy-piven) Kevin Spacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kevin-spacey) Kirt Webster (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kirt-webster) Ken Baker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken-baker) Ethan Kath (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ethan-kath) James Toback (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-toback) David Blaine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-blaine) Chris Savino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-savino) Bob Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bob-weinstein) Tyler Grasham (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tyler-grasham) Lars von Trier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lars-von-trier) Roy Price (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy-price) Oliver Stone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/oliver-stone) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 6/79 Ben Affleck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ben-affleck) Nelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nelly) Harvey Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harvey-weinstein) August 2017 Hadrian Belove (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/hadrian-belove) Shadie Elnashai (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/shadie-elnashai) Roman Polanski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roman-polanski) July 2017 Robert \"R.\" Kelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-r-kelly) Media There are 57 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported August 2018 Les Moonves (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/les-moonves) July 2018 Kimberly Guilfoyle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kimberly-guilfoyle) Antonin Kratochvil (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/antonin-kratochvil) Christian Rodriguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/christian-rodriguez) April 2018 Tom Brokaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-brokaw) March 2018 Michael Ferro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-ferro) February 2018 Alex Jones (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex-jones) Ryan Seacrest (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan-seacrest) Daniel Zwerdling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/daniel-zwerdling) January 2018 Patrick Witty (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-witty) Dayan Candappa (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dayan-candappa) Robert Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-moore) Ross Levinsohn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ross-levinsohn) James Rosen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-rosen) Kevin Braun (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kevin-braun) Steve Butts (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-butts) H. Brandt Ayers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/h-brandt-ayers) December 2017 Adrian Carrasquillo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/adrian-carrasquillo) Andrew Creighton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrew-creighton) Mike Germano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mike-germano) Rhys James (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rhys-james) Jason Mojica (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jason-mojica) Don Hazen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/don-hazen) Leonard Lopate (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/leonard-lopate) Jonathan Schwartz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jonathan-schwartz) Tavis Smiley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tavis-smiley) Ryan Lizza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan-lizza) Marshall Faulk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/marshall-faulk) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 7/79 Ike Taylor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ike-taylor) Heath Evans (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/heath-evans) Eric Weinberger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-weinberger) Donovan McNabb (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/donovan-mcnabb) Tom Ashbrook (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-ashbrook) Dylan Howard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dylan-howard) Lorin Stein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lorin-stein) John Hockenberry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-hockenberry) November 2017 Matt Lauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-lauer) Garrison Keillor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/garrison-keillor) Charlie Rose (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-rose) Glenn Thrush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/glenn-thrush) Matt Zimmerman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-zimmerman) Kaj Larsen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kaj-larsen) Vince Ingenito (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/vince-ingenito) Jann Wenner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jann-wenner) Michael Hafford (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-hafford) David Corn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-corn) October 2017 Michael Oreskes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-oreskes) Hamilton Fish (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/hamilton-fish) Mark Halperin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-halperin) Leon Wieseltier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/leon-wieseltier) Knight Landesman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/knight-landesman) Lockhart Steele (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lockhart-steele) September 2017 Harry Knowles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harry-knowles) Charles Payne (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charles-payne) August 2017 Eric Bolling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-bolling) April 2017 Sean Hannity (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sean-hannity) Bill O'Reilly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill-o-reilly) Business & Tech There are 18 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported October 2018 Andy Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-rubin) Richard DeVaul (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/richard-devaul) Amit Singhal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/amit-singhal) August 2018 Demos Parneros (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/demos-parneros) February 2018 Terdema Ussery (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/terdema-ussery) January 2018 Steve Wynn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-wynn) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 8/79 December 2017 Max Ogden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/max-ogden) Harold Ford Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harold-ford-jr) Sam Isaly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sam-isaly) November 2017 Shervin Pishevar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/shervin-pishevar) Howie Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/howie-rubin) October 2017 Caleb Jennings (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/caleb-jennings) Robert Scoble (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-scoble) Scott Courtney (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/scott-courtney) June 2017 Chris Sacca (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-sacca) Dave McClure (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dave-mcclure) Justin Caldbeck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/justin-caldbeck) Travis Kalanick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/travis-kalanick) Politics There are 46 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported November 2018 Eric Bauman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-bauman) October 2018 Albert J. Alvarez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/albert-j-alvarez) September 2018 Charles Schwertner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charles-schwertner) Brett Kavanaugh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brett-kavanaugh) David Keyes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-keyes) August 2018 Tom Frieden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-frieden) Nick Sauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nick-sauer) July 2018 Corey Coleman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/corey-coleman) Mel Watt (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mel-watt) Curtis Hill (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/curtis-hill) May 2018 Eric Schneiderman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-schneiderman) Clay Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/clay-johnson) April 2018 Tony C\u00e1rdenas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tony-cardenas) Benton Strong (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/benton-strong) Benjamin Sparks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/benjamin-sparks) February 2018 Nicholas Kettle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nicholas-kettle) Ed Crane (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-crane) Cristina Garcia (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cristina-garcia) January 2018 Burns Strider (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/burns-strider) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 9/79 Patrick Meehan (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-meehan) Jeffrey Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeffrey-klein) Eric Greitens (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-greitens) December 2017 Corey Lewandowski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/corey-lewandowski) Andrea Ramsey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrea-ramsey) Bobby Scott (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bobby-scott) Ed Murray (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-murray) Dan Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dan-johnson) Alex Kozinski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex-kozinski) Trent Franks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/trent-franks) Borris Miles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/borris-miles) Carlos Uresti (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/carlos-uresti) Matt Dababneh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-dababneh) Rub\u00e9n Kihuen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ruben-kihuen) November 2017 Blake Farenthold (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/blake-farenthold) John Conyers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-conyers) Wesley Goodman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/wesley-goodman) Al Franken (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/al-franken) Jeff Kruse (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff-kruse) Calvin Smyre (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/calvin-smyre) Steve Lebsock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-lebsock) Roy Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy-moore) Dwayne Duron Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dwayne-duron-marshall) Tony Mendoza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tony-mendoza) October 2017 Raul Bocanegra (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/raul-bocanegra) George H.W. Bush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-h-w-bush) Donald Trump (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/donald-trump) Other There are 40 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported September 2018 Cody Wilson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cody-wilson) August 2018 Ron Carlson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron-carlson) Avital Ronell (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/avital-ronell) June 2018 Francisco Ayala (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/francisco-ayala) Mark Mellor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-mellor) May 2018 Roland G. Fryer, Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roland-g-fryer-jr) George Tyndall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-tyndall) April 2018 William Jacoby (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-jacoby) March 2018 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 10/79 William Strampel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-strampel) Keith Raniere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/keith-raniere) Bill Hybels (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill-hybels) Robert Reece (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-reece) Mike Isabella (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mike-isabella) February 2018 Jorge Dom\u00ednguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jorge-dominguez) Lawrence Krauss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lawrence-krauss) Michael Feinberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-feinberg) Earl K. Sneed (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/earl-k-sneed) Sean Hutchison (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sean-hutchison) Alec Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alec-klein) January 2018 Paul Shapiro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-shapiro) Wayne Pacelle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/wayne-pacelle) John Kenneally (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-kenneally) Mohamed Muqtar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mohamed-muqtar) Jeremy Tooker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeremy-tooker) Andy Savage (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-savage) December 2017 Charlie Hallowell (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-hallowell) Brad Kern (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brad-kern) Ken Friedman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken-friedman) Mario Batali (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mario-batali) November 2017 Larry Nassar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/larry-nassar) Andr\u00e9 Balazs (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andre-balazs) October 2017 Todd Heatherton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/todd-heatherton) William Kelley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-kelley) Paul Whalen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-whalen) Erick Guerrero (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/erick-guerrero) John Besh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-besh) David Marchant (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-marchant) September 2017 T. Florian Jaeger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-florian-jaeger) April 2017 Cristiano Ronaldo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cristiano-ronaldo) October 2014 Neil deGrasse Tyson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/neil-degrasse-tyson) Back to 1 / 101 Frankie Shaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/frankie-shaw) Creator and star, Showtime's Publicly reported December 17, 2018 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 11/79 Multiple staffers have said she mishandled sex scenes, and one says she took off her own shirt in a dispute over onscreen nudity. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cShe uses this idea of being feminist and a progressive as camouflage.\u201d \u2014 anonymous staffer ( claims-1170077) Michael Weatherly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-weatherly) Actor, CBS's Bull Publicly reported December 13, 2018 co-star says he made inappropriate comments to her, including a rape joke. After she confronted him, she was written off the show. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cMy story is true and it\u2019s really affected me.\u201d \u2014 Eliza Dushku, actress ( harassment.html) Steven Wilder Striegel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/steven-wilder-striegel) Actor Publicly reported September 6, 2018 woman has said he sexually abused her when she was 14. He pleaded guilty to two felonies in 2010 in connection with the allegations, and served six months in jail. 20th Century Fox has deleted a scene featuring him from The Predator. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( story.html have no shame for what was done to me am not the one who needs to carry that shame.\u201d \u2014 Paige Carnes, who reported that Striegel abused her ( 20180912-story.html) Gerard Depardieu (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/gerard-depardieu) Actor Publicly reported August 30, 2018 An actress has said he raped her. French authorities are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThe actress told police she had been assaulted by the actor twice this month at Depardieu\u2019s home in Paris.\u201d \u2014 the New York Magazine vertical The Cut ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 12/79 Chase Finlay (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chase-finlay) Former principal dancer, New York City Ballet Publicly reported August 28, 2018 woman said he shared naked pictures of her without her consent. He has left the New York City Ballet. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[Finlay] had been secretly recording and saving explicit photographs and videos of [Alexandra Waterbury] while she was without clothing and/or while the two were engaged in sexual activities.\u201d \u2014 lawsuit filed by Alexandra Waterbury against New York City Ballet ( Asia Argento (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/asia-argento) Actress, director, #MeToo advocate Publicly reported August 19, 2018 man says she sexually assaulted him when he was 17. She has been fired from Factor Italy. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( utm_source=twitter) 3 ( \u201cMy trauma resurfaced as she came out as a victim herself.\u201d \u2014 Jimmy Bennett, actor ( assault-claim-1136667?utm_source=twitter) Rick Day (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rick- day) Photographer Publicly reported July 24, 2018 Multiple men have reported sexual assault or other sexual misconduct by Day during photo shoots. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( [Day] \u201cgot way too handsy on just about every part of my body.\u201d \u2014 Zach Zakar, model ( assault/#gs.Eq88fT8) Chris Hardwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-hardwick) Co-founder, Nerdist; host, Talking with Chris Hardwick Publicly reported June 14, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted and emotionally abused her suspended his show, but has reinstated it after an investigation. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 13/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cI\u2019m still recovering from being sexually used.\u201d \u2014 Chloe Dykstra, actress ( Morgan Freeman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/morgan-freeman) Actor; co-founder, Revelations Entertainment Publicly reported May 24, 2018 Eight women have alleged sexual harassment and \u201cinappropriate behavior,\u201d including sexually charged remarks and unwanted touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cWe knew that if he was coming by \u2026 not to wear any top that would show our breasts, not to wear anything that would show our bottoms.\u201d \u2014 senior production staff member on the film Now You See Me ( freeman-accusations/index.html) Luc Besson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/luc- besson) Director Publicly reported May 19, 2018 Multiple people have said he raped, sexually assaulted, or sexually harassed them. French police are investigating the rape allegation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( became his private Barbie doll whom he could control, dress and break.\u201d \u2014 Sand Van Roy, actress ( france-1202869487/) Boyd Tinsley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/boyd-tinsley) Violinist; former member, Dave Matthews Band; member, Crystal Garden Publicly reported May 17, 2018 man has sued Tinsley, saying Tinsley subjected him to unwanted touching and masturbated in front of him, among other unwanted behavior, while they were bandmates in Crystal Garden. Tinsley has been fired from the Dave Matthews Band. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[H]e was masturbating next to me while was sleeping, and he had his hand on my ass\u201d \u2014 James Frost-Winn, trumpet player ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 14/79 Ameer Vann (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ameer-vann) Rapper; former member, Brockhampton Publicly reported May 11, 2018 Two women have said he was verbally abusive or emotionally manipulative to them in relationships, and others have made secondhand allegations that he had sex with underage girls. He has since left Brockhampton and the group has issued an apology. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cNot only is he a predator and cheater, he also degrades women\u201d \u2014 Rhett Rowan, singer-songwriter ( allegations/) Junot D\u00edaz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/junot-diaz) Author; creative writing professor Publicly reported May 4, 2018 woman has reported that he forcibly kissed her, and others have said he subjected them to misogynistic or verbally abusive behavior. He has resigned as chair of the Pulitzer Prize Board, and has launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( was an unknown wide-eyed 26 yo, and he used it as an opportunity to corner and forcibly kiss me.\u201d \u2014 Zinzi Clemmons, author ( Allison Mack (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/allison-mack) Actress Publicly reported April 24, 2018 She has been charged with sex trafficking in connection with allegations that she recruited women to become \u201cslaves\u201d in the group Nxivm. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cMs. Mack was one of the top members of a highly organized scheme which was designed to provide sex to [Nxivm co-founder Keith Raniere]\" \u2014 assistant attorney Moira Penza ( know.html) Nicholas Nixon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nicholas-nixon) Photographer; former photography professor, Massachusetts College of Art and Design 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 15/79 Publicly reported April 4, 2018 Multiple former students have said that Nixon made inappropriate comments, sent them inappropriate emails, or asked them to pose nude. He has retired from MassArt and is the subject of a Title investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( far/9O4Yyd0CBlGSiW33Tb8tcI/story.html) 2 ( \u201cIt felt like the conversation always led back to sex.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Boston Globe ( classroom-how-far-too-far/9O4Yyd0CBlGSiW33Tb8tcI/story.html) John Kricfalusi (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-kricfalusi) Creator, The Ren & Stimpy Show Publicly reported March 29, 2018 One woman has said Kricfalusi sexually abused her when she was a minor, while another says he subjected her to sexually inappropriate behavior when she was a minor and later sexually harassed her. Cartoon Network and Adult Swim have said they will not work with him in future. Sources/more info: 1 ( bftwnews&utm_term=.ffGE92N2A#.whxjWOpO0) \u201cMy entire life had been suspended in John\u2019s since was fourteen.\u201d \u2014 Robyn Byrd, professor ( bftwnews&utm_term=.ffGE92N2A#.whxjWOpO0) Sherman Alexie (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sherman-alexie) Author Publicly reported March 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or unwanted advances toward them. He has declined a literary prize and delayed the publication of an upcoming memoir. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( declines-literary-prize) 3 ( amid-sexual-harassment-claims [\u2026] felt that he had so much power that should probably not make a fuss about this.\u201d \u2014 Elissa Washuta, author ( the-record) Jeff Franklin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeff-franklin) Former showrunner, Fuller House Publicly reported February 28, 2018 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 16/79 He has been accused of making inappropriate comments about his sex life in the workplace, and giving women he dated bit parts on Fuller House. He has been dropped from the show, and his deal with Warner Bros. will not be renewed. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cStudio executives were warned that Franklin \u2018was a walking lawsuit waiting to happen.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Cynthia Littleton, Variety ( Philip Berk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/philip-berk) Former president, Hollywood Foreign Press Association Publicly reported February 22, 2018 man has reported that Berk groped him. The is investigating the incident. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt ill felt like a little kid felt like there was a ball in my throat thought was going to cry.\u201d \u2014 Brendan Fraser, actor ( Daniel Handler (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/daniel-handler) Author, also known as Lemony Snicket Publicly reported February 21, 2018 Multiple women say he made inappropriate sexual comments in front of and about them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt was way over the line, and made me feel smaller.\u201d \u2014 Allie Jane Bruce, children's librarian ( metoo) Patrick Demarchelier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/patrick-demarchelier) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them. The magazine publisher Cond\u00e9 Nast has stopped working with him \u201cfor the foreseeable future.\u201d Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt hurts my heart so much to think of how many girls, many my own daughter\u2019s age who have had to fend off or give in to his advances because didn\u2019t speak up at the time.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, in an email to a modeling group ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Seth Sabal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/seth- sabal) Photographer 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 17/79 Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cThree models have accused Sabal of sexual harassment during the mid-2000s.\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Andre Passos (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andre-passos) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 woman has said he inserted his fingers into her vagina during a shoot when she was a teenager. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cFormer model Dasha Alexander said she was 15 when he inserted his fingers in her vagina while taking her picture about 20 years ago, saying it would give the photos \u2018more emotion.'\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Greg Kadel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/greg-kadel) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances when they were teenagers, while another said he pressured her to strip naked. Cond\u00e9 Nast and Victoria\u2019s Secret have stopped working with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cKadel helped the teenager land gig after gig with Victoria\u2019s Secret, all while subjecting her to ongoing harassment, she said, until she refused to work with him\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) David Bellemere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-bellemere) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to unwanted touching and other inappropriate behavior. Victoria\u2019s Secret has cut ties with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 18/79 felt like had no choices.\u201d \u2014 Madisyn Ritland, model ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Karl Templer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/karl-templer) Stylist Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he touched them inappropriately or aggressively during shoots. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe was trying to get me naked. [\u2026] He was trying to pull off my clothes without my permission.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Vincent Cirrincione (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/vincent-cirrincione) Talent manager Publicly reported February 2, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them, and several said he preyed specifically on young women of color. He has shut down his agency. Sources/more info: 1 ( women-are-accusing-him-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/02/259e8196-f590-11e7-b34a-b85626af34ef_story.html? utm_term=.3c5fd3c7283a) 2 ( close-agency-after-accusations-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/05/557debd0-0ab8-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html? utm_term=.48f8a9e3ec1b) \u201cThe price paid for having my good professional relationship with him was giving up my sense of self, of wholeness, of personal worth.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( henson-to-stardom-now-9-minority-women-are-accusing-him-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/02/259e8196-f590-11e7-b34a- b85626af34ef_story.html?utm_term=.3c5fd3c7283a) Paul Marciano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/paul-marciano) Co-founder, Guess Publicly reported February 1, 2018 woman has reported that he repeatedly subjected her to unwanted touching, kissing, and other advances. He has stepped away from daily responsibilities at Guess. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 19/79 \u201cIt took a huge toll on my confidence and self-worth wanted to quit modeling.\u201d \u2014 Kate Upton, model ( Charlie Walk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charlie-walk) Former president, the Republic Group Publicly reported January 29, 2018 Multiple women have accused him of harassment and inappropriate touching. He has left the Republic Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cYou would instant message me throughout the day making sexual remarks. Truly vulgar words and ideas. Pervasively.\u201d \u2014 Tristan Coopersmith, psychotherapist ( Scott Baio (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/scott-baio) Actor Publicly reported January 27, 2018 woman has reported that Baio sexually abused her when she was a minor, and a man has said Baio sexually harassed him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe was playing not only on my emotions, but my hormones and all of those things.\u201d \u2014 Nicole Eggert, actress ( 1202681478/) David Copperfield (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-copperfield) Magician Publicly reported January 25, 2018 woman has reported that he drugged and sexually assaulted her when she was 17. Sources/more info: 1 ( remember my clothes being taken off.\u201d \u2014 Brittney Lewis, former model ( 1988/) Barry Lubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/barry-lubin) Former clown, Big Apple Circus 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 20/79 Publicly reported January 23, 2018 woman has reported that he pressured her to pose for pornographic photos when she was 16. He has resigned from the Big Apple Circus. Sources/more info: 1 ( just felt really confused and lost and ashamed.\u201d \u2014 Zoey Dunne, former circus performer ( resigns.html?smid=tw-nytmetro&smtyp=cur) Michael Douglas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-douglas) Actor Publicly reported January 18, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her and masturbated in front of her. Sources/more info: 1 ( realized he thought he could do anything he wanted because he was so much more powerful than was.\u201d \u2014 Susan Braudy, writer ( moment-1075609) Joel Kramer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/joel-kramer) Stunt coordinator Publicly reported January 13, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually abused her when she was underage, and another says he sexually assaulted her. He has been dropped as a client by Worldwide Production Agency. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 1202243097 was 12, he was 36. It is incomprehensible.\u201d \u2014 Eliza Dushku, actress ( Bruce Weber (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bruce-weber) Photographer Publicly reported January 13, 2018 Multiple men have said he pressured them to pose nude or subjected them to unwanted touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( felt helpless. [\u2026] Like my agency said, he has a lot of power.\u201d \u2014 **Josh Ardolf, model ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 21/79 Mario Testino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mario-testino) Photographer Publicly reported January 13, 2018 Multiple men have said he groped them or masturbated in front of them, or made unwanted advances. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe was a sexual predator.\u201d \u2014 Ryan Locke, model ( Aziz Ansari (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/aziz- ansari) Actor, comedian Publicly reported January 13, 2018 woman has said he subjected her to unwanted touching and pressure to have sex during a date. Sources/more info: 1 ( cried the whole ride home. At that point felt violated.\u201d \u2014 Grace, to Babe.net ( James Franco (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-franco) Actor; founder, Studio 4 film school Publicly reported January 11, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he engaged in inappropriate or sexually exploitative behavior with them. Sources/more info: 1 ( feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable.\u201d \u2014 Sarah Tither-Kaplan, actress and filmmaker ( 20180111-htmlstory.html) Stan Lee (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/stan- lee) Comic book writer; former editor-in-chief, Marvel Comics Publicly reported January 9, 2018 Multiple nurses have accused Lee of sexually harassing them while they were caring for him, and another woman has alleged that he masturbated in front of her and groped her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 22/79 \u201cThe owner at the nursing company has openly said to people that Stan has sexually harassed every single nurse that has been to the house.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Mail ( nurses.html) Ben Vereen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ben-vereen) Actor, director Publicly reported January 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to inappropriate comments or unwanted touching, including pressing his genitals against them. Sources/more info: 1 ( just felt powerless because thought really needed his help and guidance.\u201d \u2014 Kim, actress, to the New York Daily News ( assault-hair-article-1.3738684) Paul Haggis (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/paul-haggis) Director, screenwriter Publicly reported January 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he raped or forcibly kissed them. He has resigned as chair of the board for Artists for Peace and Justice, a charity he founded. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) 2 ( misconduct-allegations/1021400001 felt like my life could have been over.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Associated Press ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) Albert Schultz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/albert-schultz) Actor; artistic director, Soulpepper Theatre Company Publicly reported January 3, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he committed sexual battery or sexual harassment against them. He is taking a leave of absence from the Soulpepper Theatre Company. Sources/more info: 1 ( didn\u2019t have a name for it at the time, but did fall into a depression.\u201d \u2014 Patricia Fagan, actress ( 1.4470036) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 23/79 Dan Harmon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dan-harmon) Writer; producer; creator, Community Publicly reported January 2, 2018 former employee has reported that he sexually harassed her, and he has admitted to and apologized for the behavior. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt took me years to believe in my talents again, to trust a boss when he complimented me and not cringe when he asked for my number.\u201d \u2014 Megan Ganz, writer ( Dustin Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dustin-marshall) Founder, Feral Audio podcast network Publicly reported December 21, 2017 former partner says he abused and harassed her. He is shutting down Feral Audio. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cOne night he broke into my house and crawled into bed with me, saying that we \u2018really needed to talk\u2019\u201d \u2014 Abby Weems, musician ( T.J. Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-j- miller) Actor, comedian Publicly reported December 19, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her, and others have said he harassed them or made abusive or transphobic comments. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt is unfathomable to me that he doesn\u2019t understand that he actually put me through something have to live with [\u2026] that completely, completely set the tone for my sexual adult life.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( punching-a-woman) Morgan Spurlock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/morgan-spurlock) Director Publicly reported December 14, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 24/79 He said he has been accused of rape and sexual harassment. He has stepped down from his production company and other companies have cut ties or stopped distribution of his projects. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( misconduct/950744001/) 4 ( refinery29-1202228279/) 5 ( n829581) \u201cWe stand in solidarity with the victims.\u201d \u2014 spokesperson for Pretty Matches and Refinery29, announcing the suspension of a docuseries on women's issues that Spurlock was to produce ( matches-refinery29-1202228279/) Jon Heely (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jon- heely) Director of music publishing, Disney Publicly reported December 8, 2017 He is accused of sexually abusing two underage girls. He has been charged with three felony counts of child sexual abuse and suspended without pay from Disney. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cImmediately upon learning of this situation tonight, he has been suspended without pay until the matter is resolved by the courts.\u201d \u2014 Disney spokesperson, to Variety ( 1202634502/) Melanie Martinez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/melanie-martinez) Singer-songwriter Publicly reported December 5, 2017 woman has said that Martinez raped her. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.jwvZEZe9a#.niyNlNbAD) 2 ( happened never said yes said no, repeatedly. But she used her power over me, and broke me down.\u201d \u2014 Timothy Heller, singer ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F by-a-former-friend) Bryan Singer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bryan-singer) Director 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 25/79 Publicly reported December 4, 2017 man has sued Singer, saying he was raped by Singer at the age of 17. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cHe smirked and said, if say anything, he was very popular and could basically ruin my reputation.\u201d \u2014 Cesar Sanchez-Guzman ( Peter Martins (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/peter-martins) Retired ballet master in chief, New York City Ballet Publicly reported December 4, 2017 Multiple people say he sexually harassed or verbally or physically abused them, or abused his power through sexual relationships with other dancers. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( accusation.html?action=click&contentCollection=Dance&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article) 3 ( action=click&contentCollection=Dance&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article) 4 ( 5 ( \u201cHe\u2019s yanking me around to the left and to the right, he\u2019s digging his left thumb and his middle finger felt like he was piercing my muscle.\u201d \u2014 Victor Ostrovsky, former student, School of American Ballet ( ballet-new-york-city-physical-abuse.html) James Levine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-levine) Former conductor, Metropolitan Opera Publicly reported December 3, 2017 Multiple men have reported that he sexually abused them, some when they were teenagers. He has been fired from the Met, and the Ravinia Festival has cut ties with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( saw him as a safe, protective person, he took advantage of me, he abused me and it has really messed me up.\u201d \u2014 Ashok Pai ( Israel Horovitz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/israel-horovitz) Playwright Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Multiple women have said that he sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, or raped them. The Gloucester Stage theater has cut ties with him. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 26/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( share&referer= felt close to him like a grandfather, but also he was a somewhat famous guy whose time felt privileged to have. [\u2026] For the man who represented all that, to treat me the way he did, was the ultimate betrayal.\u201d \u2014 Maia Ermansons ( share&referer= Geoffrey Rush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/geoffrey-rush) Actor Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Two former co-stars have said he subjected them to unwanted sexual comments and inappropriate behavior. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( nytimes) \u201c[T]here was a small shaving mirror over the top of the partition between the showers and he was using it to look down at my naked body.\u201d \u2014 Yael Stone, actress ( smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes) Jean-Claude Arnault (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/jean-claude-arnault) Photographer; influential Swedish cultural figure; husband of Swedish Academy member Publicly reported November 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he raped or sexually harassed them. He was convicted on two counts of rape in Sweden and sentenced to two and a half years in prison. The allegations caused the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Literature to be delayed. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201c[T]here had been no flirtation or touch just found a hand up my crotch.\u201d \u2014 Gabriella H\u00e5kansson, author ( John Lasseter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-lasseter) CEO, Pixar and Walt Disney Animation Studios Publicly reported November 21, 2017 Multiple people said he had a pattern of sexually harassing women. He has taken a leave of absence from Pixar. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_source=twitter&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral) 2 ( 1059594) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 27/79 \u201cHe hugged and hugged and everyone\u2019s looking at you. Just invading the space.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Hollywood Reporter ( detailed-by-disney-pixar-insiders-1059594) Murray Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/murray-miller) Writer, Girls Publicly reported November 17, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her when she was 17 years old. Police have launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cAt some point woke up in Murray\u2019s bed naked. He was on top of me having sexual intercourse with me. At no time did consent to any sexual contact with Murray.\" \u2014 Aurora Perrineau, actress ( Sylvester Stallone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sylvester-stallone) Actor Publicly reported November 16, 2017 woman has reported that he and another man sexually assaulted her when she was 16. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cI\u2019m kind of scared and I\u2019m very ashamed don\u2019t want anybody else to have that happen to them, but don\u2019t want to prosecute.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to police, according to the Daily Mail ( forcing-teen-threesome.html) Ron Jeremy (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron- jeremy) Adult film actor Publicly reported November 15, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or sexually assaulted them, or subjected them to unwanted touching. He has been dropped from at least two industry events. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt felt like he had preplanned this in his head, like he did this to everybody.\u201d \u2014 Lynsey G., journalist ( Andy Henry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andy-henry) Casting staff Publicly reported November 15, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 28/79 Multiple women say he told them to take off their clothes as part of what he described as an acting exercise. He was fired from the show and his firm in 2008 as a result of the reports, and placed on a leave of absence from his job in 2017 when the reports became public. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt really planted a seed in my head, that maybe wasn\u2019t good enough. Of, what did do wrong?\u201d \u2014 Catherine Black, actress ( disrobing-1058398) Jesse Lacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jesse-lacey) Lead vocalist, guitarist, Brand New Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Two women have said he solicited explicit photos from them when they were minors, along with other sexually abusive behavior. The band has postponed upcoming shows. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( misconduct-postpones-tour) 3 ( \u201cThis will definitely stay with me for the rest of my life.\u201d \u2014 Nicole Elizabeth Garey ( exploitation-of-minors/) Tom Sizemore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-sizemore) Actor Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Multiple cast and crew members have said he sexually abused a young girl on a film set, and he has been convicted of physically abusing and harassing an ex-girlfriend. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( movie-set-in-2003-then-clicks-delete/) \u201cAt one point her eyes got just huge, like she could\u2019ve vomited was watching her.\u201d \u2014 Robyn Adamson, actress, describing the girl Sizemore allegedly abused ( sizemore-was-removed-movie-set-allegedly-violating-11-year-old-girl-1057629) Mark Schwahn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mark-schwahn) Showrunner, One Tree Hill and The Royals Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed, manipulated, or made inappropriate comments to them while they worked on The Royals or One Tree Hill. He has been fired from The Royals. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 29/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( wauchope-1202207461/) \u201cMany of us were spoken to in ways that ran the spectrum from deeply upsetting, to traumatizing, to downright illegal. And a few of us were put in positions where we felt physically unsafe.\u201d \u2014 18 female cast and crew members of One Tree Hill, in an open letter ( 1202614198/) Peter Aalb\u00e6k Jensen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/peter-aalbaek-jensen) Co-founder (with Lars von Trier), Zentropa production company Publicly reported November 12, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped them or helped create a hostile working environment. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( saw women being degraded. According to the Zentropa propaganda would be part of an \u2018alternative work culture\u2019, but in reality encountered an old-fashioned, patriarchal power structure.\u201d \u2014 Anna Mette Lundtofte, writer and journalist ( of-degradation-and-sexual-harassment) Eddie Berganza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eddie-berganza) Former editor Comics Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( was physically ill from being stressed all the time and trying to hide it just felt like needed to get out, however could.\u201d \u2014 Liz Gehrlein Marsham, children's author ( utm_term=.wkWbqwBwk#.arwQAjRjW) Richard Dreyfuss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/richard-dreyfuss) Actor Publicly reported November 10, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her over a period of years, once exposing himself to her. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=vulture&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 30/79 \u201cHe created a very hostile work environment, where felt sexualized, objectified, and unsafe.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Teich, writer ( utm_campaign=vulture&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1) Gary Goddard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/gary-goddard) CEO, the Goddard Group Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Eight men have reported that he sexually abused them when they were minors. He has taken a leave of absence from the Goddard Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cMy vulnerability was exploited was molested by Goddard, my best friend was raped by him \u2014 and this went on for years.\u201d \u2014 Anthony Edwards, actor ( Andrew Kreisberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrew-kreisberg) Former showrunner, Supergirl, Arrow Publicly reported November 10, 2017 More than a dozen people who worked with him have said he had a pattern of sexual harassment, including unwanted kissing and touching. He has been fired by Warner Bros Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cIt was an environment in which women \u2014 assistants, writers, executives, directors \u2014 were all evaluated based on their bodies, not on their work.\u201d \u2014 Anonymous male writer, to Variety ( 1202612522/) George Takei (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/george-takei) Actor Publicly reported November 10, 2017 man reported that Takei drugged and groped him. The accuser has since walked back most of the story. Sources/more info: 1 ( bftwnews&utm_term=.rnvvpkMzrM#.ohpvqj5O35) 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 31/79 just want him to apologize for taking advantage of our friendship.\u201d \u2014 Scott R. Brunton, former actor and model ( of-drugs-assault/) Steven Seagal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steven-seagal) Actor Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or behaved threateningly toward them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( weinstein-scandal thought about like was the last girl that day. How many girls had to take off their clothes? How many girls had to do more?\u2019\u201d \u2014 Jenny McCarthy, actress ( 1202205465/) Louis C.K. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/louis- c-k) Comedian Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them, in some cases by masturbating in front of them wide release for his upcoming film and his standup special have been canceled; several media companies have ended their relationships with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was just actually sort of common knowledge in the comedy world. [\u2026] People made jokes about it all the time.\u201d \u2014 Rebecca Corry, comedian ( Matthew Weiner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matthew-weiner) Showrunner Publicly reported November 9, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( 1201895936/) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 32/79 had the Emmy, but instead of being able to use that as a launch pad for the rest of my career, it became an anchor because felt had to answer to speculative stories in the press eventually walked away instead of fighting back.\u201d \u2014 Kater Gordon, writer ( mad-men-1201895936/) Russell Simmons (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/russell-simmons) Music executive Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of rape, sexual assault, or battery. He has stepped down from his companies. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( 5 ( couldn\u2019t open the doors couldn\u2019t open the windows. The car was moving. The driver did not stop. He did not take me to 19th Street. He took me to your apartment.\u201d \u2014 Jenny Lumet, screenwriter ( guest-column-1062934) Robert Knepper (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-knepper) Actor Publicly reported November 8, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of sexual assault. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News_now_2017-12- 05%2007:39:00_HLewis&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews just sat there and cried for a while. My dress was torn was dirty.\u201d \u2014 Susan Bertram, costume designer ( veteran-costume-designer-1055914) Jeffrey Tambor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeffrey-tambor) Actor Publicly reported November 8, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or forcibly kissed them. He has left the show Transparent. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 33/79 \u201cGiven the journey and circumstances of my life was used to being treated as a sexual object by men \u2014 this one just happened to be famous.\u201d \u2014 Trace Lysette, actress ( Ed Westwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ed-westwick) Actor Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of sexual assault or rape. Several television shows have been postponed or have paused his involvement while police investigate. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cMy other friends and people around me told me it was best not to say anything, to not be \u2018that girl\u2019 and that no one would believe me.\u201d \u2014 Aur\u00e9lie Wynn, former actress ( utm_term=.pgNaQoboN#.geWag8w8K) Adam Venit (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/adam-venit) Agent Publicly reported November 3, 2017 man has reported that Venit sexually assaulted him. Venit was suspended for a month and has been demoted. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cThis whole thing with Harvey Weinstein is giving me PTSD. Why? Because this kind of thing happened to ME.\u201d \u2014 Terry Crews, actor ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2F executive-amid-harvey-weinstein-allegations) Danny Masterson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/danny-masterson) Actor Publicly reported November 2, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped them. He has been written out of Netflix\u2019s The Ranch, and law enforcement has begun an investigation into the case. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 34/79 \u201cAccording to a report filed with the Los Angeles Police Department, the woman said Masterson raped her while she was \u2018passed out,\u2019 and when she awoke and realized he was raping her, she struggled with him until he choked her and she passed out again.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( accusations_us_59fa8410e4b01b474048242a?9o4) Nick Carter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nick-carter) Lead singer, Backstreet Boys Publicly reported November 2, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her in 2003. Prosecutors have declined to bring criminal charges because the statute of limitations has expired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( told him to stop, but he didn\u2019t.\u201d \u2014 Melissa Schuman, former singer ( Brett Ratner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/brett-ratner) Producer, director Publicly reported November 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually assaulted or harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( don\u2019t know how different would be today \u2014 less hardened, less jaded, more trusting, all those things \u2014 if it never happened.\u201d \u2014 Natasha Henstridge, actress ( allegations-article-1.3605363) Dustin Hoffman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dustin-hoffman) Actor Publicly reported November 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cMy heart aches for the awkward virgin with the bad hair who had only been kissed three times in her life, laughing as the man her father\u2019s age talked about breasts and sex want to weep that she found this charming.\u201d \u2014 Anna Graham Hunter, writer ( guest-column-1053466) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 35/79 Andy Dick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy- dick) Actor and comedian Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple people said he groped and harassed men and women on film sets. He has been fired from two films. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cHe systematically went woman by woman and just said a bunch of gross things almost mechanically, robotically, and made every single one of them uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vulture ( Jeremy Piven (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeremy-piven) Actor Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually assaulted or harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( ran outside and hailed a cab and just burst into tears cried the entire way back to my hotel.\u201d \u2014 Tiffany Bacon Scourby, ad executive ( Kevin Spacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kevin-spacey) Actor Publicly reported October 29, 2017 Multiple men have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them, or made sexual advances when they were underage. He has been fired from House of Cards and police are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.iu423zYw1Y#.nevrx9d73d) 2 ( 3 ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) 4 ( 5 ( 6 ( 7 ( 8 ( \u201cWhat he left me with, more than what he took from me, was a sense that deserved this. And that\u2019s the knot I\u2019m still untangling.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vulture ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 36/79 Kirt Webster (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kirt-webster) Publicist Publicly reported October 27, 2017 man has said Webster sexually assaulted him. Webster has stepped away from his firm. Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct) 2 ( \u201cFor years was so ashamed, and since then, I\u2019ve overdosed once and I\u2019ve slit my wrists another time.\u201d \u2014 Austin Rick, former country singer ( exec-kirt-webster-of-sexual-misconduct) Ken Baker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken- baker) Senior correspondent News Publicly reported October 26, 2017 Two women have said he sexually harassed them. He is not appearing on air while investigates. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( almost feel like it\u2019s a power trip. It\u2019s like can do these things.\u2018\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Wrap ( about-a-sex-toy/) Ethan Kath (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ethan-kath) Co-founder, Crystal Castles Publicly reported October 24, 2017 former bandmate has reported that he raped and physically and psychologically abused her. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt has taken me years to recover from enduring almost a decade of abuse, manipulation and psychological control am still recovering.\u201d \u2014 Alice Glass, singer ( James Toback (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-toback) Director, screenwriter Publicly reported October 22, 2017 More than 200 women have reported unwanted touching or advances, including several who said he masturbated in front of them. He has been dropped by his agent. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 37/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was shocked and frozen and didn\u2019t know what to do thought if resisted, it could get worse.\u201d \u2014 Terri Conn, actress ( story.html) David Blaine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-blaine) Magician Publicly reported October 19, 2017 woman has reported that he raped her. Police are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAfter this happened didn\u2019t want to go out, and didn\u2019t want to go to my castings wouldn\u2019t get the job because now was insecure.\u201d \u2014 Natasha Prince, art dealer ( Chris Savino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-savino) Animator; creator, The Loud House Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them or subjected them to unwanted advances or other inappropriate behavior. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( had an opportunity to work at Nickelodeon a long time ago and didn\u2019t take the job because knew he would be inside the studio.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Cartoon Brew ( allegedly-offered-animation-work-exchange-sexual-favors-154152.html) Bob Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bob-weinstein) Producer; co-founder, the Weinstein Company Publicly reported October 17, 2017 woman has said that he sexually harassed her over a period of months. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe didn\u2019t want a friendship. He wanted more than that.\u201d \u2014 Amanda Segel, showrunner ( Tyler Grasham (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tyler-grasham) Former agent 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 38/79 Publicly reported October 17, 2017 Multiple men have said that he sexually assaulted them or made unwanted advances. He has been fired, and police have launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( told him no but he asked me to cuddle and kiss didn\u2019t want it to ruin my career, so did.\u201d \u2014 Brady Lindsey ( Lars von Trier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lars-von-trier) Director Publicly reported October 17, 2017 woman has accused him of a months-long pattern of sexual harassment. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( didn\u2019t comply or agree on being sexually harassed. That was then portrayed as me being difficult. If being difficult is standing up to being treated like that, I\u2019ll own it.\u201d \u2014 Bj\u00f6rk, singer-songwriter ( Roy Price (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy- price) Former head, Amazon Studios Publicly reported October 12, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has resigned from Amazon. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was shocking and surreal.\u201d \u2014 Isa Hackett, executive producer ( top-exec-roy-price-1048060?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News_now_2017- 10-12%2014:27:54_ehayden&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews) Oliver Stone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/oliver-stone) Director Publicly reported October 12, 2017 One woman has reported that he groped her, while another said his behavior after a meeting made her uncomfortable. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.com%2Fmovies%2Fcarrie-stevens-harvey-weinstein-oliver-stone%2F) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 39/79 still remember the cocky grin on his face like he got away with something.\u201d \u2014 Carrie Stevens, model and actress ( misconduct) Ben Affleck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ben-affleck) Actor Publicly reported October 10, 2017 Two women have reported that he groped them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F harvey-weinstein-sexual-harassment had to laugh back then so wouldn\u2019t cry.\u201d \u2014 Hilarie Burton, actress ( Nelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nelly) Rapper Publicly reported October 7, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cAfterward, Greene says she was screaming she wanted off the bus \u2026 and an entourage member pushed her off, and Nelly threw a $100 bill at her and said, \u2018Bye bye ( Harvey Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harvey-weinstein) Producer; co-founder, the Weinstein Company Publicly reported October 5, 2017 More than 80 women have reported that he sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, or raped them, in incidents dating back decades. He has been fired from the Weinstein Company. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cJust his body, his presence, his face, bring me back to the little girl that was when was twenty-one. [\u2026] When see him, it makes me feel little and stupid and weak.\u201d \u2014 Asia Argento, actress ( weinsteins-accusers-tell-their-stories) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 40/79 Hadrian Belove (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/hadrian-belove) Former executive managing director, Cinefamily Publicly reported August 23, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her, and others say he judged female employees on their looks and dated subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cWhen started volunteering was told he liked to test the new meat.\u201d \u2014 Karina Chacham, former volunteer, Cinefamily ( utm_term=.qfPWBKZkV#.enDOJrjZa) Shadie Elnashai (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/shadie-elnashai) Former vice president, Cinefamily board of directors Publicly reported August 23, 2017 Multiple people have said he inappropriately touched or pursued female subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cShadie doesn\u2019t watch the movies \u2014 he just hits on girls in the back.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to BuzzFeed News ( Roman Polanski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/roman-polanski) Director, producer, writer Publicly reported August 15, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or sexually abused them when they were under 18. He has pleaded guilty to statutory rape. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHow do know there aren\u2019t other victims? How do know that he\u2019s not still doing this?\u201d \u2014 Marianne Barnard, artist ( deserted-beach-10-years-old/) Robert \"R.\" Kelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-r-kelly) Singer-songwriter Publicly reported July 17, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 41/79 Multiple people have accused him of controlling the sex lives and even eating habits of women who live in his properties. He was acquitted in 2008 of child pornography charges. His lawyer, publicist, and assistant have quit, and Spotify has stopped promoting his music. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.kpQrXj1YE1#.bjlVK6xdPx) 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cR. Kelly is the sweetest person you will ever want to meet. [\u2026] But Robert is the devil.\u201d \u2014 Asante McGee ( utm_term=.lyYOrOKpJ#.psgJKJazA) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 57 Les Moonves (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/les-moonves) Former Publicly reported August 6, 2018 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them. He has stepped down from CBS. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( harassment-claims) 3 ( \u201cWhat happened to me was a sexual assault, and then was fired for not participating.\u201d \u2014 Illeana Douglas, actress and writer ( of-sexual-misconduct) Kimberly Guilfoyle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kimberly-guilfoyle) Former Fox News host Publicly reported July 27, 2018 Multiple people have said she showed colleagues photographs of male genitals, discussed sexual matters at work, or was emotionally abusive. She has left Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cSix sources said Guilfoyle\u2019s behavior included showing personal photographs of male genitalia to colleagues (and identifying whose genitals they were)\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( news_us_5b5a6064e4b0b15aba96f4de) Antonin Kratochvil (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/antonin-kratochvil) Photojournalist 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 42/79 Publicly reported July 16, 2018 Multiple people have said he harassed and groped them or others. He has resigned from the photo agency he helped found. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( [\u2026] didn\u2019t say anything because didn\u2019t want to be seen as, you know, the cliched hysterical woman complaining about things.\u201d \u2014 Anastasia Taylor-Lind, photojournalist ( Christian Rodriguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/christian-rodriguez) Photojournalist Publicly reported July 16, 2018 Multiple women say he sexually harassed them, in many cases after offering them mentorship or a job. He has been dropped by the prestigious photographers' collective Prime. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cHe jumped on the bed, he was on top of me, making pictures.\u201d \u2014 Lina Botero, photographer ( Tom Brokaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-brokaw) Journalist; former anchor Nightly News Publicly reported April 26, 2018 Three women have said he made unwanted advances toward them in the 1990s. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( felt powerless to say no. He could ruin my career.\u201d \u2014 Linda Vester, former correspondent ( correspondent-1202789627/) Michael Ferro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-ferro) Former chair, Tronc Publicly reported March 19, 2018 Two women have said Ferro subjected them to unwanted kissing or touching in what they thought were business meetings. Others have said he behaved inappropriately with female employees. He has resigned from Tronc. Sources/more info: 1 ( suddenly realized that was alone in this apartment with him and that it might not be very easy to leave.\u201d \u2014 Kathryn Minshew, startup co-founder ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 43/79 Alex Jones (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex- jones) Founder, Infowars Publicly reported February 28, 2018 woman has reported that he groped her, sexually harassed her, and made a racist comment toward her, as well as created a hostile work environment for other women. Sources/more info: 1 ( knew that he had specifically touched my behind at that moment as a sly come-on that other people may not notice.\u201d \u2014 Ashley Beckford, former production assistant, Free Speech Systems ( Infowars-employees-claim-Alex-Jones-harassed-them.html) Ryan Seacrest (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ryan-seacrest host Publicly reported February 26, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually harassed and assaulted her, including groping her and grinding his genitals against her. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAs proud as am and as strong as a woman as am, as smart as am and as much work as I\u2019ve done with therapists, it really affected me.\u201d \u2014 Suzie Hardy, stylist ( Daniel Zwerdling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/daniel-zwerdling) Former investigative correspondent Publicly reported February 6, 2018 Multiple people have reported that he sexually harassed them or engaged in inappropriate behavior. He has retired from NPR. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( sexual-misconduct-claim) \u201cNow I\u2019m literally afraid of men in the workplace.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Current ( Patrick Witty (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/patrick-witty) Photojournalist; former National Geographic photographer Publicly reported January 29, 2018 Multiple women say he subjected them to unwanted kissing or advances. He no longer works at National Geographic. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 44/79 \u201cIt felt like he didn\u2019t take me or my work seriously.\u201d \u2014 Andrea Wise, photographer and editor ( misconduct) Dayan Candappa (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dayan-candappa) Chief content officer, Newsweek Media Group; former Americas editor, Reuters Publicly reported January 29, 2018 subordinate at Reuters reported that he repeatedly sexually harassed her. He was removed from his job at Reuters. Newsweek placed him on leave after the Reuters case became public, but reinstated him after an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThe next day in the office, he told her she was \u2018heartbreakingly beautiful,\u2019 according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Rossalyn Warren, BuzzFeed News ( utm_term=.unkPVGXGN#.beodeVlVa) Robert Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-moore) Former managing editor, New York Daily News Publicly reported January 22, 2018 Multiple former employees have said he sexually harassed co-workers. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( complaint) 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe had all the power there.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to HuffPost ( Ross Levinsohn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ross-levinsohn) Former publisher, Los Angeles Times Publicly reported January 18, 2018 He has been sued in two separate sexual harassment lawsuits. He was placed on unpaid leave at the Los Angeles Times, and then resigned. After an investigation cleared him, he was named of a new unit within the Times\u2019s parent company, Tronc. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cRoss created a definite frat boys' club [\u2026] They openly would rate women.\u201d \u2014 Jessie Dennen, former recruitment chief, Alta Vista ( behavior-trail-la-times-publisher-s-career) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 45/79 James Rosen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-rosen) Former chief Washington correspondent, Fox News Publicly reported January 10, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he made unwanted advances toward them. He has left Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn a shared cab ride back from a meal, Rosen groped her, grabbing her breast. After she rebuffed his advance, Rosen sought to steal away her sources and stories related to his interests in diplomacy and national security.\u201d \u2014 David Folkenflik ( harassment-claims) Kevin Braun (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kevin-braun) Former editor-in-chief News Publicly reported January 5, 2018 He has been placed on leave to complete treatment for inappropriate behavior, including sexual harassment. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe will be on an indefinite leave of at least six months to address personal matters that have negatively affected his relationship with the company and our staff.\u201d \u2014 Michael Witt, publisher News ( Steve Butts (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-butts) Former editor-in-chief Publicly reported January 3, 2018 An employee has reported that he committed sexual harassment, and a former employee says he mishandled her report of sexual harassment by another co-worker. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow) \u201cHe told me, \u2018Don\u2019t be so uptight about it.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Kallie Plagge, editor ( utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow) H. Brandt Ayers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/h-brandt-ayers) Chair of the Consolidated Publishing Company, which publishes the Anniston Star Publicly reported January 1, 2018 Multiple women say he spanked them against their will when they worked with him at the Anniston Star in Anniston, Alabama. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 46/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( spanked/) 2 ( ac32-a7243e990784.html) 3 ( accused-of-spanking-female-employees-in-1970s/?utm_term=.edb39ca6070f was still determined to be a reporter after that. [\u2026] But hated Brandy Ayers with every cell in my body.\u201d \u2014 Veronica Pike Kennedy, former Anniston Star reporter ( assaulting-reporters-in-s/article_097db56a-ef17-11e7-ac32-a7243e990784.html) Adrian Carrasquillo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/adrian-carrasquillo) Former White House correspondent, BuzzFeed News Publicly reported December 27, 2017 co-worker reported receiving an inappropriate message from him. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2017-12) 2 ( \u201cIn responding to a complaint filed last week by an employee, we learned that Adrian violated our Code of Conduct by sending an inappropriate message to a colleague.\u201d \u2014 BuzzFeed spokesperson, to Business Insider ( adrian-carrasquillo-following-harassment-claims-2017-12) Andrew Creighton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrew-creighton) President, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 woman said she was fired after she turned down a sexual relationship with him. He has been placed on leave. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThere is a toxic environment where men can say the most disgusting things, joke about sex openly, and overall a toxic environment where women are treated far inferior than men.\u201d \u2014 Sandra Miller, former head of branded production, Vice Media ( sexual-harassment.html?_r=0) Mike Germano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mike-germano) Chief digital officer, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 Two women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or touched them inappropriately. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 47/79 \u201cMany women join at an early and vulnerable point in their career. For some, sexual harassment and conscious and unconscious prejudice have overshadowed their future in journalism and severely damaged their confidence.\u201d \u2014 Vice workers, in an open letter ( Rhys James (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/rhys-james) Producer, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 woman reported that he made racist and sexist comments to her. He has been placed on leave. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAmong Ms. Fuertes-Knight\u2019s claims were that a Vice producer, Rhys James, had made racist and sexist statements to her, including asking about the color of her nipples and whether she slept with black men.\u201d \u2014 Emily Steel, New York Times ( Jason Mojica (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jason-mojica) Former head of Vice News Publicly reported December 23, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to unwanted touching or advances, or retaliated after a sexual relationship. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAs women, we get harassed everywhere and we don\u2019t feel compelled to report it because it\u2019s not considered a reportable offense.\" \u2014 Abby Ellis, journalist ( Don Hazen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/don- hazen) Former executive editor, AlterNet Publicly reported December 21, 2017 Multiple women say he sexually harassed them. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( utm_term=.xyMwBwRPo#.jmnP1PNaM) \u201cEvery in-person meeting had with him, which understood to be a requirement of my employment, felt like an excuse for him to sexually harass me.\u201d \u2014 Laura Gottesdiener, journalist ( utm_term=.prwXAXGVm&bftwnews#.sbX2J2Lqm) Leonard Lopate (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/leonard-lopate) Former radio host Publicly reported December 21, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 48/79 Multiple people say he made inappopriate comments or sexually harassed them. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cLeonard definitely said inappropriate things to me and my coworkers lot.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Jonathan Schwartz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jonathan-schwartz) Former radio host Publicly reported December 21, 2017 Two women say he made inappopriate comments to them, and one of them says he also touched her in an unwelcome way. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt wasn\u2019t the least bit traumatic. It was inappropriate.\u201d \u2014 Kerry Nolan, radio host ( Tavis Smiley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tavis-smiley) Host, Tavis Smiley Publicly reported December 13, 2017 Multiple people have said he had sexual relationships with subordinates and created an abusive and threatening environment. His show has been suspended. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cSome witnesses interviewed expressed concern that their employment status was linked to the status of a sexual relationship with Smiley.\u201d \u2014 Daniel Holloway, Variety ( Ryan Lizza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan- lizza) Former reporter, New Yorker Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has said he engaged in sexual misconduct. He has been fired by the New Yorker. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cOur client reported Mr. Lizza\u2019s actions to ensure that he would be held accountable and in the hope that by coming forward she would help other potential victims.\u201d \u2014 Douglas H. Wigdor, lawyer for the accuser ( _r=0) Marshall Faulk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/marshall-faulk) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 49/79 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cFaulk would ask Cantor \u2018deeply personal and invasive questions\u2019 about her sex life; he also fondled her breasts and groped her behind, according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Ike Taylor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ike- taylor) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cTaylor sent Cantor \u2018sexually inappropriate\u2019 pictures and a video of him masturbating in the shower, according to the filing.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Heath Evans (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/heath-evans) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt\u2019s outrageous conduct.\u201d \u2014 Laura Horton, lawyer for Jami Cantor, a former Network stylist who is alleging sexual harassment ( Eric Weinberger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-weinberger) President, the Ringer; former Network executive producer Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Ringer. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cWeinberger sent \u2018several nude pictures of himself and sexually explicit texts\u2019 and told Cantor she was \u2018put on earth to pleasure me,\u2019 according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 50/79 Donovan McNabb (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/donovan-mcnabb) Analyst, ESPN; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by ESPN. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cDonovan McNabb, a former analyst, also texted her explicit comments, according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Tom Ashbrook (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-ashbrook) Former radio host Publicly reported December 8, 2017 More than 20 current and former employees have said he verbally abused or intimidated them, or subjected them to unwanted touching. After an investigation, he has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( worry that Tom\u2019s behavior discourages young women from continuing in journalism.\" \u2014 anonymous, to ( Dylan Howard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dylan-howard) Editor, National Enquirer, Us Weekly, and other publications Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple former employees said he sexually harassed women at work. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt\u2019s almost like had Stockholm syndrome.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the ( Lorin Stein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lorin-stein) Former editor, Paris Review Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple people have said he made unwanted advances on them, fostered a workplace culture in which looks mattered more than work, or had sex with subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 51/79 \u201cHe wanted us to be pretty, he wanted us to act that role, and if we didn\u2019t, we weren\u2019t in the light of favor.\u201d \u2014 Deirdre Foley-Mendelssohn, editor ( smid=tw-share&_r=0) John Hockenberry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-hockenberry) Retired radio host Publicly reported December 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them or sent unwanted sexual or suggestive messages. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe\u2019d been very supportive of me, and thought he\u2019d only been like that because he wanted to sleep with me.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Cut ( Matt Lauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-lauer) Former anchor, Today show Publicly reported November 29, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them, including one who said she passed out during an assault. He has been fired from NBC. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.rsDwWBw6x#.smoOjYO5Z) 2 ( 3 ( action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=66154191&pgtype=Homepage&_r=0) \u201cHe couldn\u2019t sleep around town with celebrities or on the road with random people, because he\u2019s Matt Lauer and he\u2019s married. So he\u2019d have to do it within his stable, where he exerted power, and he knew people wouldn\u2019t ever complain.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Variety ( Garrison Keillor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/garrison-keillor) Founding host Prairie Home Companion Publicly reported November 29, 2017 woman reported that he subjected her to unwanted sexual touching. He has been dropped by Minnesota Public Radio and the Washington Post syndicate. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( compa) 3 ( stand-out/?utm_term=.861a89aa22f1) 4 ( simply-touching-a-womans-bare-back/?utm_term=.a40b5a33fa3a) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 52/79 \u201cMinnesota Public Radio (MPR) is terminating its contracts with Garrison Keillor and his private media companies after recently learning of allegations of his inappropriate behavior with an individual who worked with him.\u201d \u2014 Minnesota Public Radio statement ( garrison-keillor-and-a-prairie-home-compa) Charlie Rose (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charlie-rose) Former anchor This Morning; former host, Charlie Rose Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple women have said that he sexually harassed them. He has been fired by CBS, PBS, and Bloomberg. Sources/more info: 1 ( and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.879296022b7a) 2 ( accusations-n822691) \u201cEverybody is terrified of him. [\u2026] He creates this environment of constant fear. And then he\u2019ll shine a spotlight on you and make you feel amazing.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( harassed-them--with-nudity-groping-and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html? utm_term=.aa939cb97a9d) Glenn Thrush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/glenn-thrush) Reporter, New York Times Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple women have said that he made unwanted advances toward them. He was suspended by the New York Times and removed from the White House beat. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hate feeling obligated to make him think think everything is fine. [\u2026] It\u2019s been this thing hanging over me feel like have to be nice to this person just because he knows people.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vox ( Matt Zimmerman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-zimmerman) Former executive News Publicly reported November 16, 2017 Multiple people have said he pursued relationships with young women who worked with him, and sent inappropriate text messages. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 53/79 \u201cWe have recently learned that Matt Zimmerman engaged in inappropriate conduct with more than one woman at NBCU, which violated company policy. As a result, he has been dismissed News spokesperson ( claims-1058026) Kaj Larsen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kaj- larsen) Former bureau chief, Vice Publicly reported November 15, 2017 woman has reported that he subjected her to unwanted touching and inappropriate sexual comments. He is no longer at the company. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt felt like a threat. [\u2026] The way he looked at me, the way he grabbed my arm remember feeling scared.\u201d \u2014 Phoebe Barghouty, former Vice associate producer ( vice-of-toxic-sexual-harassment-culture) Vince Ingenito (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/vince-ingenito) Former editor Publicly reported November 13, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her and a female co-worker. In March, he said he had been laid off. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt got to the point where couldn\u2019t work for multiple hours a day because was having panic attacks, so decided to quit.\u201d \u2014 Kallie Plagge, editor ( Jann Wenner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jann-wenner) Publisher, Rolling Stone Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple people have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them or subjected them to unwanted advances or touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hadn\u2019t known exactly how violating sexual harassment really was until felt the pull inside myself as he dangled that contract in front of my face (at the time was quite desperate for work), while on the other hand was filled with revulsion over his proposition.\u201d \u2014 Ben Ryan, writer ( Michael Hafford (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-hafford) Freelance writer; former \"Male Feminist\" columnist at Broadly, a Vice Media site 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 54/79 Publicly reported November 3, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or abused them. He has been banned from contributing to Vice websites. Sources/more info: 1 ( think was in very deep denial that somebody who everybody knows and likes his writing would be capable of hurting me that much.\u201d \u2014 Helen Donahue, former Vice writer and social media editor ( allegatio-1819266286) David Corn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-corn bureau chief, Mother Jones Publicly reported November 2, 2017 Multiple people have said he engaged in inappropriate workplace behavior, including unwanted touching and rape jokes. Mother Jones investigated previous reports, and did so again when new information surfaced, finding no misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn the summer and fall of 2014, some women staffers reported that they had quit pitching stories involving rape because David\u2019s reactions made them so uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 a former Mother Jones staffer ( 244482) Michael Oreskes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-oreskes) Former senior vice president of news and editorial director, NPR; former editor, New York Times Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them. He has resigned from NPR. Sources/more info: 1 ( women/2017/10/31/a2078bea-bdf7-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.b4dda71446b3) 2 ( \u201cThe worst part of my whole encounter with Oreskes wasn\u2019t the weird offers of room service lunch or the tongue kiss but the fact that he utterly destroyed my ambition.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( harassment-by-two-women/2017/10/31/a2078bea-bdf7-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.b4dda71446b3) Hamilton Fish (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/hamilton-fish) Former publisher, the New Republic; former president, the Nation Institute Publicly reported October 29, 2017 Multiple people said he subjected female employees to inappropriate remarks, touching, and unfair treatment. He has resigned from the New Republic. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 55/79 \u201cIt all took place against a backdrop where there was no personnel handbook and no one in an role.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to HuffPost ( women_us_59f79183e4b0c0c8e67c258e) Mark Halperin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mark-halperin) Political journalist and author Publicly reported October 25, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them, in some cases by pressing his genitals against them. He has been dismissed by News and MSNBC, and a book and project have been canceled. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cFor the last 11 years have had to watch this guy find success in every other news organization.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Leon Wieseltier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/leon-wieseltier) Former literary editor, the New Republic; founding editor, Idea Journal of Politics and Culture Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. The magazine he was to head has been shuttered. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( didn\u2019t feel like there was ever any recourse for his behavior, because he was treated as a powerful, even untouchable, person, certainly more important and indispensable than me.\u201d \u2014 Katherine Marsh, writer ( Knight Landesman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/knight-landesman) Former publisher, Artforum Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple women and men have accused him of sexual harassment or unwanted touching. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhenever I\u2019d see him my body would contract in fear so started avoiding him.\u201d \u2014 anonymous ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 56/79 Lockhart Steele (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lockhart-steele) Former editorial director, Vox Media Publicly reported October 20, 2017 former employee has reported unwanted kissing and touching by him. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[S]uddenly, in the dark corner of the car, he was kissing my neck.\u201d \u2014 Eden Rohatensky, developer ( fucking-creeps-119f0cbd3f07) Harry Knowles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harry-knowles) Founder, Ain't It Cool News Publicly reported September 23, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them. He has stepped down from Ain\u2019t It Cool News. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cHarry sexually harassed me. He has sexually harassed other women in this community for years. This wasn\u2019t an anomaly. He is a predator.\u201d \u2014 Britt Hayes, film writer ( ) Charles Payne (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charles-payne) Host, Fox Business; contributor, Fox News Publicly reported September 18, 2017 woman says that he raped her, and that Fox retaliated against her when she reported the experience. Payne was suspended but has returned to work following an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( _r=0&referer= 2 ( \u201cIn July of 2013 was raped by Charles Payne. [\u2026] In July of 2017 was raped again by Fox News.\u201d \u2014 Scottie Nell Hughes, political commentator ( payne.html?_r=0&referer= Eric Bolling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric- bolling) Former host, Fox News Publicly reported August 4, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 57/79 Multiple people say he sent unsolicited photos of male genitals to at least 3 colleagues. He has left Fox News, and his show has been canceled. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cThe women did not solicit the messages, which they told colleagues were deeply upsetting and offensive.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( messages_us_5984d2bbe4b0cb15b1be6d65?hd6) Sean Hannity (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sean-hannity) Host, Fox News Publicly reported April 21, 2017 former Fox News guest has said he asked her to come back to his hotel, and did not invite her back on his show after she refused. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cAfter said wouldn\u2019t go to his hotel was blacklisted from Fox News.\u201d \u2014 Debbie Schlussel, lawyer and blogger ( harassment-claim-n750211) Bill O'Reilly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill- o-reilly) Former host, Fox News Publicly reported April 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. He has been fired from Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was like street harassment in the office.\u201d \u2014 Perquita Burgess, former Fox temp worker ( sexual-harassment-995841) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 18 Andy Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andy-rubin) Former Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 Google employee accused him of coercing her into oral sex, and a company investigation found her claim credible, according to two Google executives. He resigned from Google in 2014 with a $90 million exit package. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 58/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cShe agreed to meet him at a hotel, where she said he pressured her into oral sex.\u201d \u2014 New York Times ( Richard DeVaul (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/richard-devaul) Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 woman whom DeVaul had interviewed for a job says he invited her to what she thought was a professional meeting, then asked her to take off her shirt and offered her a back rub. He has apologized for an \u201cerror of judgment,\u201d and Google has taken unspecified \u201ccorrective action.\u201d Sources/more info: 1 ( didn\u2019t have enough spine or backbone to shut that down as a 24-year-old.\u201d \u2014 Star Simpson, engineer ( Amit Singhal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/amit-singhal) Former Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 An employee said that he groped her, according to three people briefed on the incident. He resigned and received an exit package worth millions of dollars, they said. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn 2015, an employee said Mr. Singhal groped her at a boozy off-site event attended by dozens of colleagues, said three people who were briefed on the incident.\u201d \u2014 New York Times ( Demos Parneros (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/demos-parneros) Former CEO, Barnes & Noble Publicly reported August 28, 2018 former employee said he sexually harassed her. He was fired for this and other violations of company policies, according to Barnes & Noble. Sources/more info: 1 ( [Parneros was] \u201cterminated for sexual harassment, bullying behavior and other violations of company policies.\u201d \u2014 Barnes & Noble board of directors ( lawsuit.html) Terdema Ussery (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/terdema-ussery) Former president and CEO, Dallas Mavericks; former president of global sports, Under Armour Publicly reported February 20, 2018 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 59/79 Multiple women say he subjected them to unwanted advances or touching, or other inappropriate behavior, while they worked for the Mavericks or Under Armour. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt trapped, frozen, scared.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Sports Illustrated ( cuban-response) Steve Wynn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-wynn) Founder, Wynn Resorts; former finance chair, Republican National Committee Publicly reported January 27, 2018 Dozens of people have said that he pressured female employees to perform sex acts, exposed himself, or engaged in unwanted touching. He has resigned from the and from Wynn Resorts. Sources/more info: 1 ( 1516985953) 2 ( 3 ( was not brave enough to say, \u2018How dare you?\u2019\u201d \u2014 Shawn Cardinal, former personal assistant to Wynn's ex-wife ( of-sexual-misconduct-by-las-vegas-mogul-steve-wynn-1516985953) Max Ogden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/max-ogden) Computer programmer; executive director, Code for Science & Society Publicly reported December 15, 2017 former partner reported that Ogden was sexually abusive, controlling, and coercive. Ogden has stepped down from leadership roles with Code for Science & Society and the Dat Project. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( think \u2014 all the time \u2014 about my silence. How it protected him while he abused me & protects him now.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Lord, web developer ( Harold Ford Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harold-ford-jr) Former managing director and senior client relationship manager, Morgan Stanley; former representative (D-TN) Publicly reported December 7, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed and intimidated her. He has been fired from Morgan Stanley, but the bank now says he was not fired for sexual misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 60/79 \u201cThe woman alleged that Ford engaged in harassment, intimidation, and forcibly grabbed her one evening in Manhattan, leading her to seek aid from a building security guard.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( psa) Sam Isaly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sam- isaly) Co-founder, managing partner, OrbiMed Publicly reported December 5, 2017 Multiple people have reported that he sexually harassed female employees. He announced plans to retire. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( harassment-allegations/933808001/) 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt was like a fact of life that everyone had to accept. Sam just did what he could get away with.\u201d \u2014 Yanping Ren, former OrbiMed intern ( Shervin Pishevar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/shervin-pishevar) Venture capitalist; co-founder, Sherpa Capital Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Multiple woman say he sexually assaulted or harassed them. He has resigned from Sherpa Capital. Sources/more info: 1 ( multiple-women) 2 ( wanted to get career advice, and it was twisted into something else.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Bloomberg ( sexual-misconduct-by-multiple-women) Howie Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/howie-rubin) Former portfolio manager, Soros Fund Management Publicly reported November 3, 2017 Three women have reported that he raped and beat them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhile arrogance and self-import may convince certain men otherwise, neither money nor power gives any person the right to victimize a woman.\u201d \u2014 Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for one of the women ( women-in-penthouse-dungeon/) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 61/79 Caleb Jennings (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/caleb-jennings) Former lead Chicago organizer, Fight for 15 (SEIU) Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple staffers reported that he had a sexist attitude and physically assaulted a female staffer, who was later fired criminal court found him not guilty of assault. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cThe sexist and aggressive attitude of Caleb Jennings has created a toxic environment and fear inside the office of the FF15.\u201d \u2014 four Chicago organizers, in an email to SEIU's president ( utm_term=.loVMKgYgn#.fke9KO0OA) Robert Scoble (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-scoble) Blogger; co-founder, the Transformation Group Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually assaulted or harassed them. He has resigned from the Transformation Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( allegations/789071001/) \u201cIt made me sick to work with him, but also he was offering so much help. [\u2026] As women we sometimes have to make tough choices. Do want to call him out, or do want to advance my career?\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to TechCrunch ( women-after-going-sober/) Scott Courtney (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/scott-courtney) Former executive vice president, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple people have said he had a history of relationships with young female staffers, who were later promoted. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cQuestions were raised about Executive Vice President Scott Courtney relating to a romantic relationship between a staff person and a supervisor.\u201d \u2014 Mary Kay Henry international president ( utm_term=.kamE9wKw5#.wbXe01w1v) Chris Sacca (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-sacca) Retired venture capital investor 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 62/79 Publicly reported June 30, 2017 woman reported that he touched her face without her consent. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThere is such a massive imbalance of power that women in the industry often end up in distressing situations.\u201d \u2014 Susan Wu, entrepreneur and investor ( sexual-harassment.html?_r=0) Dave McClure (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dave-mcclure) Investor; co-founder, 500 Startups Publicly reported June 30, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her, and another says he made an unwanted advance. He has said he made inappropriate advances to multiple women and has resigned from 500 Startups. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt\u2019s the worst position to be in when you feel helpless about something you know was outright wrong.\u201d \u2014 Cheryl Yeoh, entrepreneur ( Justin Caldbeck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/justin-caldbeck) Co-founder, former managing partner, Binary Capital Publicly reported June 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them. He has resigned from Binary Capital. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhile we\u2019re happy that he apologized and we\u2019re happy especially for the support of the amazing women and men, our strong preference would have been to not be in this position to begin with.\u201d \u2014 Leiti Hsu, co-founder of the startup Journy ( making-unwanted-advances/) Travis Kalanick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/travis-kalanick) Founder, Uber Publicly reported June 17, 2017 female employee has said he visited a bar with escort services, along with her and other employees, making her uncomfortable. Multiple employees also reported discrimination, sexual harassment, and a toxic environment at the company. Kalanick has resigned. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 63/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cEvery time something ridiculous happened, every time a sexist email was sent, I\u2019d sent a short report to just to keep a record going.\u201d \u2014 Susan J. Fowler, former Uber engineer ( uber ) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 46 Eric Bauman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-bauman) Former chair, California Democratic Party Publicly reported November 28, 2018 Multiple people say he made sexually explicit comments in the workplace and other professional settings, and engaged in unwanted touching. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt really embarrassed, almost ashamed, and uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 Grace Leekley, temporary party staffer ( 20181128-story.html) Albert J. Alvarez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/albert-j-alvarez) Former chief of staff, New Jersey Schools Development Authority Publicly reported October 10, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her when they both worked on New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy\u2019s campaign. He has resigned from his position with the New Jersey schools. Sources/more info: 1 ( criminal-allegation-642671?mod=article_inline) 2 ( straight up said: \u2018This is not consensual.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Katie Brennan, chief of staff, New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency ( assault-accusation-in-new-jersey-exposes-a-national-dilemma-1539542172) Charles Schwertner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charles-schwertner) Texas state senator (R-Georgetown) Publicly reported September 25, 2018 graduate student at Austin said he sent her an explicit text message Austin investigation found it was \u201cplausible\u201d that a third party had sent the message, though Schwertner did not fully cooperate with the investigation. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 64/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct-claim/asnidSImg1fcb2FNBZ8iCO/) 2 ( \u201cPlease stop the inappropriate texts, it is unprofessional.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, graduate student, in a message to Schwertner ( related-investigation-charles-schwertner/) Brett Kavanaugh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/brett-kavanaugh) Supreme Court justice Publicly reported September 14, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her, another has said he thrust his genitals in her face without her consent, and others have said they witnessed abusive or inappropriate behavior by him. After a hearing and investigation into some of the allegations, he was confirmed to the Supreme Court. Sources/more info: 1 ( kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress) 2 ( about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html) 3 ( supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez) 4 ( 5 ( thought that Brett was accidentally going to kill me.\u201d \u2014 Christine Blasey Ford, psychology professor ( statement-for-senate-hearing) David Keyes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-keyes) Former spokesperson for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel Publicly reported September 11, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her, and three others have said he tried to bully them into sex. He has resigned as Netanyahu\u2019s spokesperson. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt was completely nonconsensual.\u201d \u2014 Julia Salazar, New York state Senate candidate ( israel.html) Tom Frieden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-frieden) Former director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Publicly reported August 24, 2018 woman reported that he groped her. He has been charged with sexual abuse, forcible touching, and harassment. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 65/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( idUSKCN1L91PV) 2 ( saw his face again and realized all this man had been doing was protecting himself.\u201d \u2014 the woman who has reported that Frieden groped her ( busted-groping-20180824-story.html) Nick Sauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nick-sauer) Former state representative, Illinois (R-51st district) Publicly reported August 1, 2018 An ex-girlfriend has said he posted nude photos of her on a fake Instagram account without her consent. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cNick would use [a fake Instagram account] to direct message men with my photos to engage in graphic conversations of a sexual nature.\u201d \u2014 Kate Kelly, ex-girlfriend of Nick Sauer ( Corey Coleman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/corey-coleman) Former personnel chief, Federal Emergency Management Agency Publicly reported July 30, 2018 He is under investigation in connection with allegations that he sexually harassed an employee and created an environment in which women were hired as possible sex partners for male employees. He has resigned from FEMA. Sources/more info: 1 ( employees-agency-chief-says/2018/07/30/964da518-9403-11e8-80e1-00e80e1fdf43_story.html?utm_term=.8feb29dc11f9) 2 ( complaints/2018/08/02/52d9785e-964f-11e8-810c-5fa705927d54_story.html?utm_term=.b182fd5f90b3) \u201cWhat we uncovered was a systemic problem going back years.\u201d \u2014 William \"Brock\" Long administrator ( some-as-possible-sexual-partners-for-male-employees-agency-chief-says/2018/07/30/964da518-9403-11e8-80e1- 00e80e1fdf43_story.html?utm_term=.8feb29dc11f9) Mel Watt (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mel- watt) Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency (Democrat) Publicly reported July 27, 2018 An employee has said he sexually harassed her. He is under investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( metoo-story/?utm_term=.6010e94fbbba) 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 66/79 felt vulnerable and unsafe.\u201d \u2014 Simone Grimes, supervisory program management analyst ( watches-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-house-will-hear-another-metoo-story/?utm_term=.6010e94fbbba) Curtis Hill (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/curtis-hill) Attorney general, Indiana (Republican) Publicly reported July 2, 2018 lawmaker, two staffers, and another woman have said he touched them inappropriately. He is under criminal investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hill/868706002/) 3 ( appointed/826870002/) \u201c[H]e grabbed my hand and moved both of our hands over my butt, lingering there before releasing me.\u201d \u2014 Niki DaSilva, Indiana state Senate aide ( memo-detailing-allegations-against-hill/868706002/) Eric Schneiderman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-schneiderman) Former attorney general, New York (D) Publicly reported May 7, 2018 Multiple women have said he physically abused them, in some cases during sex. He has resigned. After an investigation, prosecutors announced he would not face criminal charges. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cTaking a strong woman and tearing her to pieces is his jam.\u201d \u2014 Michelle Manning Barish, writer and activist ( attorney-general-of-physical-abuse) Clay Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/clay-johnson) Political technoogy expert; former lead programmer, Howard Dean campaign Publicly reported May 4, 2018 Two women have said he sexually assaulted them, and others have said he made inappropriate sexual comments. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 67/79 \u201c[B]efore could say anything, the next thing remember is was pinned on his bed.\u201d \u2014 Sarah Schacht, former Howard Dean campaign staffer ( dean-campaign_us_5aebb6d7e4b0c4f1932090ac?pdb) Tony C\u00e1rdenas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tony-cardenas representative (D-CA) Publicly reported April 27, 2018 woman has sued, alleging that an unnamed elected official sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager. C\u00e1rdenas has confirmed he is the subject of the suit, though he denies the allegations. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( abuse/2018/05/03/0f2ef7d8-4f04-11e8-af46-b1d6dc0d9bfe_story.html?utm_term=.2d65cb07fae2) \u201cThe suit alleges sexual battery, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.\u201d \u2014 Dakota Smith, Los Angeles Times ( Benton Strong (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/benton-strong) Former associate director for communications, Center for American Progress Action Fund; former employee, Seattle Office of Sustainability and Energy Publicly reported April 23, 2018 Two women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or sent unwanted, sexually explicit text messages. Another woman reported that he harassed and assaulted her after a breakup in college. He has resigned from his job with the city of Seattle. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.ovxDYDMne#.vp8QvQOwn surely expected better out of an organization that housed a national campaign on sexual assault.\u201d \u2014 Mary, in a memo to ( utm_term=.ovxDYDMne#.vp8QvQOwn) Benjamin Sparks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/benjamin-sparks) Political adviser Publicly reported April 4, 2018 Sparks\u2019s ex-fianc\u00e9e has said that he sexually enslaved and battered her. He has been fired from the consulting firm where he was the political affairs director and has been charged with misdemeanor domestic battery. Sources/more info: 1 ( her-his-sex-slave/) 2 ( woman-his-sex-slave/) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 68/79 \u201cOver the last month it escalated into very rough sex where he\u2019d actually hurt me.\" \u2014 anonymous, to the Las Vegas Review-Journal ( says-las-vegas-gop-campaign-adviser-made-her-his-sex-slave/) Nicholas Kettle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nicholas-kettle) Former Rhode Island state senator (R-Coventry) Publicly reported February 19, 2018 He has been charged with video voyeurism for allegedly sending nude photos of a woman without her knowledge, and with extorting sex from a teenage state House page. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( house-page) 3 ( \u201cMr. Kettle stated that he needed to be \u2018stealthy\u2019 and was asking [the friend] for advice on how to take a video without [his girlfriend] knowing.\u201d \u2014 Robert Hopkins, Rhode Island state police detective ( girlfriend-to-married-friend/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_StephMachado) Ed Crane (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed- crane) Co-founder, Cato Institute Publicly reported February 8, 2018 Multiple woman say he sexually harassed them, and others say he made inappropriate comments about women\u2019s bodies and clothing in the workplace. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_content=buffer16e91&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer) \u201cThe minute she left he turned to all the men in the room and went, \u2018Man, I\u2019d love to have her sit on my face.\u2018\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Politico ( utm_content=buffer16e91&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer) Cristina Garcia (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/cristina-garcia) California state Assembly member (D) Publicly reported February 8, 2018 Multiple men have reported that she groped them or made unwanted advances. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( spin-the-bottle-complaint-says/?utm_term=.b3da754dce8d) \u201cShe looked at me for a second and said, \u2018I\u2019ve set a goal for myself to fuck you.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Politico ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 69/79 Burns Strider (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/burns-strider) Former adviser, Hillary Clinton presidential campaign (2008); former leader, Correct the Record Publicly reported January 26, 2018 woman reported that he sexually harassed her while they worked on the Clinton campaign, and multiple former colleagues say he was fired from Correct the Record after sexual harassment allegations there. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2008.html?smid=tw-share) \u201cShe told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed her shoulders inappropriately, kissed her on the forehead and sent her a string of suggestive emails\u201d \u2014 Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick, New York Times ( to-shield-a-top-adviser-accused-of-harassment-in-2008.html?smid=tw-share) Patrick Meehan (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/patrick-meehan representative (R-PA) Publicly reported January 20, 2018 former aide reported that he made unwanted advances toward her. He has been removed from the House Ethics Committee and will not seek reelection. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cMr. Meehan professed his romantic desires for her \u2014 first in person, and then in a handwritten letter \u2014 and he grew hostile when she did not reciprocate, the people familiar with her time in the office said.\u201d \u2014 Katie Rogers and Kenneth P. Vogel, New York Times ( harassment.html) Jeffrey Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeffrey-klein) New York state senator (D-Bronx) Publicly reported January 10, 2018 woman says he forcibly kissed her. The New York state Democratic Party has called for an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cAll of a sudden there was a hand on the back of my head and he shoved his tongue down my throat.\u201d \u2014 Erica Vladimer, former New York state Senate staffer ( misconduct_us_5a5531cbe4b03417e872f80e?4ps) Eric Greitens (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-greitens) Governor, Missouri (R) Publicly reported January 10, 2018 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 70/79 According to an investigative report, he coerced a woman into oral sex, claimed to have taken a compromising photo of her, and threatened to release it if she told anyone. He has been charged with invasion of privacy. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe stepped back saw a flash through the blindfold and he said: \u2018you\u2019re never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, on a tape obtained by ( affair#.WlbpAn6BIAA.twitter) Corey Lewandowski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/corey-lewandowski) Political commentator; former campaign manager for Donald Trump Publicly reported December 22, 2017 woman has filed a sexual assault complaint against him, saying he slapped her twice on the buttocks. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was completely demeaning and shocking.\u201d \u2014 Joy Villa, singer ( Andrea Ramsey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrea-ramsey) Former candidate for the House of Representatives (D-KS) Publicly reported December 15, 2017 man has reported that she sexually harassed him and retaliated when he rejected her advances. She has dropped out of her congressional race. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAfter rejected her, she told me she now was hearing bad things about my performance and on June 13, 2005, terminated my employment.\u201d \u2014 Gary Funkhouser, former employee, LabOne ( Bobby Scott (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bobby-scott representative (D-VA) Publicly reported December 15, 2017 woman reports that he sexually harassed her. Sources/more info: 1 ( denied-lawmaker/955214001/) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 71/79 was propositioned to have a sexual relationship with my boss that did not want was retaliated against was wrongfully terminated and was blackballed.\u201d \u2014 M. Reese Everson, author and attorney ( alleges-sexual-harassment-strongly-denied-lawmaker/955214001/) Ed Murray (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed- murray) Secretary of state, Wyoming (R) Publicly reported December 14, 2017 woman says that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( assaulted/article_2f1faf41-90a7-52b4-b6c6-bbf374843977.html#utm_source=trib.com&utm_campaign=%2Femail- updates%2Fbreaking%2F&utm_medium=email&utm_content was disgusted and horrified.\u201d \u2014 Tatiana Maxwell, real estate developer ( secretary-of-state-ed-murray-sexually-assaulted/article_2f1faf41-90a7-52b4-b6c6- bbf374843977.html#utm_source=trib.com&utm_campaign=%2Femail- updates%2Fbreaking%2F&utm_medium=email&utm_content=) Dan Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dan-johnson) Former state representative (R-KY) Publicly reported December 12, 2017 woman reported that he sexually assaulted her when she was 17. He killed himself shortly after the allegations were published. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( resign/) 3 ( his-widow-calls-it-a-high-tech-lynching/?utm_term=.de8f0844cfb5) \u201cWhat you did was beyond mean, it was evil.\u201d \u2014 Maranda Richmond, in a message to Johnson ( Alex Kozinski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/alex-kozinski) Retired judge Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Publicly reported December 9, 2017 Multiple former employees have said he showed them pornography, touched them inappropriately, or made inappropriate sexual comments to them. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct/2017/12/08/1763e2b8-d913-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.48dd2ff565cf) 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 72/79 3 ( allegations) \u201cIt wasn\u2019t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people \u2014 my professional colleagues \u2014 to do so as well.\u201d \u2014 Emily Murphy, former clerk ( kozinski-accused-of-sexual-misconduct/2017/12/08/1763e2b8-d913-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.c956f1b10870) Trent Franks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/trent-franks) Former representative (R-AZ) Publicly reported December 7, 2017 House sources said that he approached two female staffers about acting as a gestational surrogate for his wife and him. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was asked a few times to look over a \u2018contract\u2019 to carry his child, and if would conceive his child would be given $5 million.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Borris Miles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/borris-miles) State representative (D-TX) Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple people have said that he subjected women to unwanted advances, sexual comments, or forcible kissing. Sources/more info: 1 ( just remember thinking need to go, and need to not be here anymore.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( capitol) Carlos Uresti (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/carlos-uresti) State representative (D-TX) Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe put his hands on me, he ogled me would not get in an elevator with him.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( capitol) Matt Dababneh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-dababneh) Former California state Assembly member (D) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 73/79 Publicly reported December 4, 2017 woman has reported that he exposed himself to her and masturbated in front of her, and another has said he harassed her. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( bathroom/) 2 ( \u201cDuring the time he blocked me in that room, my instincts were focused on escaping without physical contact and in a way that would not cause a scene.\u201d \u2014 Pamela Lopez, lobbyist ( harassed-her-in-a-bathroom/) Rub\u00e9n Kihuen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ruben-kihuen representative (D-NV); former Nevada state senator Publicly reported December 1, 2017 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.iiPJY3D5AD#.uuJqGL8648) 2 ( \u201cYou don\u2019t really know what to say when a senator tells you, like, \u2018Nice ass.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Nevada Independent ( persistent-unwanted-sexual-advances) Blake Farenthold (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/blake-farenthold representative (R-TX) Publicly reported November 30, 2017 former staffer sued him, alleging gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and creating a hostile work environment. He used taxpayer money to settle the claim. He will not seek reelection. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt\u2019s definitely turned my life upside down.\u201d \u2014 Lauren Greene, former communications director for Farenthold ( sexual-harass-greene-278869) John Conyers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-conyers) Former representative (D-MI) Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple former employees have said he sexually harassed female staffers. He has resigned. 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 74/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( says/2017/12/05/17057ea0-d9bb-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.37d0bbc4ae44 was basically blackballed. There was nowhere could go.\" \u2014 anonymous, to BuzzFeed ( utm_term=.jaYwr3D3b#.uxxxQ5g5V) Wesley Goodman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/wesley-goodman) Former state representative (R-OH) Publicly reported November 17, 2017 man reported that Goodman groped him, and multiple men said he sent them unwanted or inappropriate sexual or suggestive messages. He quit after it was revealed that he had a consensual sexual encounter with a man in his office. Sources/more info: 1 ( gop-star/2017/11/17/b3b4b8da-c956-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html) 2 ( goodman/) 3 ( male.html) \u201cHe also asked how much \u2018p******y was getting and wondering what was doing on Friday and Saturday nights.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( gop-rep-wes-goodman/) Al Franken (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/al- franken senator (D-MN) Publicly reported November 16, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped or otherwise harassed them. He has announced that he will resign from Congress. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was stunned and incredulous felt demeaned felt put in my place.\u201d \u2014 anonymous former elected official in New England, to Jezebel ( franken-tried-to-g-1820849687) Jeff Kruse (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff- kruse) Oregon state senator (R-Roseburg) Publicly reported November 15, 2017 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 75/79 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed or inappropriately touched them. He has been relieved of committee assignments and is under investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhat made all of this worse is that not only was continuing to experience this behavior, [\u2026] but was witnessing this happen to other women.\u201d \u2014 Sara Gelser, Oregon state senator (D-Corvallis) ( Calvin Smyre (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/calvin-smyre) Georgia state representative (D-Columbus) Publicly reported November 10, 2017 woman reported that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHow many stories of assault and harassment have never been told because of political connections?\u201d \u2014 Jehmu Greene, political commentator ( Steve Lebsock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-lebsock) Former state representative, Colorado (D-Thornton) Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them. The Colorado House of Representatives has voted to expel him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cOn Monday, for the first time in nearly two years, I\u2019m going to come to a building where I\u2019m not going to be worried about retaliation from someone stood up to.\u201d \u2014 Faith Winter, Colorado state representative ( Roy Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy- moore) Former judge; 2017 Senate candidate Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually abused or assaulted them, or pursued them sexually or romantically when they were teenagers. Sources/more info: 1 ( 32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.512aedc10bfb) 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 76/79 felt like had done something bad. And it kind of set the course for me doing other things that were bad.\u201d \u2014 Leigh Corfman, customer service representative ( initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html? tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.d9990836f257) Dwayne Duron Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/dwayne-duron-marshall) Former chief of staff to Rep. Brenda Lawrence (D-MI) Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple women have said he made inappropriate comments or engaged in unwanted touching in the workplace. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cShe\u2019s complicit because she knows. [\u2026] She knows he makes comments. She knows he rubs the back and rubs the shoulders.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, about Rep. Lawrence, to Politico ( aide-244617) Tony Mendoza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tony-mendoza) California state senator (D-Artesia) Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple people have said that he behaved inappropriately with a female legislative fellow and other staffers. He is under investigation and has been stripped of his leadership positions. Sources/more info: 1 ( 1513299672-htmlstory.html) 2 ( 3 ( 1517619265-htmlstory.html) \u201cShe said she feared for her job if she refused the invitations.\u201d \u2014 Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times ( mendoza-under-investigation-for-1517619265-htmlstory.html) Raul Bocanegra (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/raul-bocanegra) Former California state Assembly member (D) Publicly reported October 27, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped them or made unwanted advances. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( election/) 3 ( misconduct/) 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 77/79 \u201cHe grabbed me with one hand, grabbed my head and shoved his tongue into my mouth.\u201d \u2014 Sylvia Castillo, former student mentorship program coordinator ( lawmaker-accused-of-groping-fellow-staffer-will-not-run-for-re-election/) George H.W. Bush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/george-h-w-bush) Former president Publicly reported October 25, 2017 Multiple women have said he groped them during photo ops. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cAt the very moment when was feeling honored to be recognized for my work and to raise money for this important organization that believe in, President Bush made clear to me that because am a woman can be objectified, sexualized, reduced to a body part.\u201d \u2014 Christina Baker Kline, novelist ( Donald Trump (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/donald-trump) President of the United States Publicly reported October 15, 2017 More than a dozen women have accused him of sexual assault, harassment, or other misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( her-consent-the-white-house-denies-the-charge/2019/02/25/fe1869a4-3498-11e9-946a-115a5932c45b_story.html? utm_term=.a63ec198874b) \u201cHe was like an octopus. [\u2026] His hands were everywhere.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Leeds, businesswoman ( hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top- news) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 40 Mohamed Muqtar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mo muqtar) Assistant athletic director for student services, University of California Berkeley Publicly reported January 17, 2018 former student-athlete has said he sexually assaulted her, and another has said he behaved inappropriately. He is on admi university. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 78/79 \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf WRITING: Anna North, Constance Grady, Laura McGann, Aja Romano EDITING: Michelle Garcia, Susannah Locke, Eleanor Barkhorn DESIGN: Amanda Northrop, Christina Animashaun DEVELOPMENT: Ryan Mark, Kavya Sukumar EDITING: Tanya Pai LEAD: Kainaz Amaria Images: AP, Getty Images, Vjeran Pavic, Wikicommons ( Terms of Use ( \u2022 Privacy Policy ( \u2022 \u00a9 Vox Media, Inc. ( All rights reserved want the shame to not be my own anymore want the shame to fall on him\u201d \u2014 Layshia Clarendon player ( 2/22/25, 8:41 Mohamed Muqtar Berkeley assistant athletic director for student services, sexual misconduct allegations 79/79", "8220_105.pdf": "Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation May 17, 2018 / 4:36 San Francisco (AP) \u2014 The University of California at Berkeley has fired a longtime member of the athletic department after an investigation found he violated the university's sexual violence and sexual harassment policy with former student- athletes, including women's basketball player Layshia Clarendon. Clarendon, a current guard for the WNBA's Atlanta Dream, filed a lawsuit in January against now-terminated Cal staffer Mohamed Muqtar \u2014 who initially had News Weather Sports Video 48\u00b0 Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:41 Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation San Francisco 1/5 been placed on paid leave as Cal launched its investigation. The school said Thursday that Muqtar was fired effective last Friday, releasing a statement saying, \"it pains us to hear about these actions by one of our employees who student- athletes turned to as a trusted adviser.\" Clarendon was at Cal from 2009 to 2013. When she filed the lawsuit, Clarendon posted on Twitter: \"It feels there is a big level of responsibility there for me, to make sure this doesn't continue. And he doesn't continue to harm other people.\" She also tweeted that she had filed the lawsuit because want the shame to not be my own anymore, because it's not my shame to carry, but it's something that I've had to carry.\" She continued: \"It's a horrible thing to live in silence, to carry that pain and that weight and the guilt.\" See More 00:00 00:00 Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:41 Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation San Francisco 2/5 In the civil suit, Clarendon claimed that Muqtar sexually assaulted her in his apartment during the 2009-2010 school year. The lawsuit said Muqtar invited Clarendon back to his apartment to watch a jazz concert video. At some point, the suit claims, Clarendon excused herself to use the restroom. While inside, the suit said that Muqtar opened the door and assaulted Clarendon. The suit stated that Clarendon's injuries \u2014 which includes severe mental pain, shock and depression \u2014 were delayed until the spring of 2017. The assistant director of student services, Muqtar had been working for the university for more than 25 years, the school said. \"Our thoughts are with the survivors and providing them with the resources they need through the healing process,\" the school said in a statement. \"No one should be subject to unwanted advances or verbal or physical abuse, and we encourage any member of our campus community who has experienced sexual violence or sexual assault to reach out for help, which can include counseling, academic accommodations, information about the reporting process, and more.\" \u00a9 Copyright 2018 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Associated Press contributed to this report. More from News Sonoma State University students, faculty to rally against budget cuts police union tells embattled Sheriff Corpus not to attend upcoming event Vallejo school board to close 2 schools amid budget cuts; more closures to follow Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:41 Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation San Francisco 3/5 \u00a9 2018 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Dublin High brawl sends 2 students to hospital, locks down campus Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy Join new Free to Play War Thunder Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Why You Should Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Top Packaging Trends In 2024 - Take Look Search Now Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Explore Affordable Camper Van Options Learn More The Cost Of Amusement Park Equipment From Mexico Might Surprise You (See Prices) Learn More Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 8:41 Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation San Francisco 4/5 \u00a92025 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Details Contact News Sports Weather Program Guide Sitemap About Us Advertise Television Jobs Public File for / CBS5 Public File for / KPIX+ Public Inspection File Help Applications Report Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now Elderly Woman Lives in an Old Shed - Take a Peek Inside! Don't judge before you see the inside Amusement Park Equipment In Mexico Might be Given Away For Almost Nothing! Learn More Passive Income Ideas Sitting at Home Watch News 2/22/25, 8:41 Cal Fires Athletic Department Employee After Sexual Assault Investigation San Francisco 5/5", "8220_106.pdf": "Woman accuses Cal players, staff of harassment 6y - Kyle Bonagura Nebraska nixes Tennessee home-and- home plan 22h - Adam Rittenberg Beck, Cavinder luxury cars stolen; man arrested 20h - Andrea Adelson Share The University of California's athletic department has referred allegations of sexual harassment to its Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination, the school said in a statement Wednesday. Cal's response came after a former sports medicine intern in the athletic department outlined several alleged instances of sexual harassment she said involved unnamed Cal Kyle Bonagura Mar 21, 2019, 10:56 Woman accuses Cal players, staff of harassment 2/22/25, 8:41 Woman accuses Cal players, staff of harassment 1/3 Elee, Terps commit, top '26 DE, nixes other visits 15h - Eli Lederman Former Portis joins Delaware State staff 22h Texas latest programs to nix spring games 2d - Dave Wilson football players, coaches and staff members. \"We are aware of the very disturbing public allegations made on social media,\" Cal's statement read. \"Allegations of sexual violence and sexual harassment by campus employees are confidential unless officials determine policy is violated, and disciplinary action has been decided.\" Cal student Paige Cornelius wrote in a Facebook post that in March 2018 she had \"medically withdrawn from school, seeking intensive therapy and psychiatry for the post traumatic stress syndrome and anxiety that happened from the time spent working for the Cal Football team.\" Cornelius outlined what she said were several alleged instances of sexual harassment involving players, coaches and staff members, including being told will get you fired if you do not have sex with me\" by someone she identified as a member of the coaching staff. Cornelius later told in a phone interview that last fall she reached out to Cal athletic director Jim Knowlton, football coach Justin Wilcox and other staff members about her experiences but did not receive a response. This was partly the reason she went public with her story, she said. Cornelius said that the man who threatened to get her fired if she withheld sex from him was a volunteer assistant. He is no longer with the program, a source told ESPN. It is unclear what led to his departure from Cal or when it occurred. Cornelius wrote on Facebook that she often was objectified by players and staff. \"If responded please leave me alone to a [direct message on social media was answered back with, 'I'm going to treat you like the hoe that you are,'\" she wrote. After Cornelius blocked one staff member on Instagram, she said she noticed him following her home. She says he caught up to her outside her home and suggested they go to the pool together, because he thought she would \"look amazing in a bikini.\" \"This coach is still employed by Cal Football, just to make that clear,\" she wrote. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:41 Woman accuses Cal players, staff of harassment 2/3 On Thursday, Knowlton sent a letter to season ticket holders and donors describing the action taken by the department after learning of the allegations. The letter said, in part, that \"we will lend our full moral and operational support to the campus inquiry into these allegations. We will support the imposition of appropriate consequences as required by the outcome of that inquiry.\" Last year, an internal investigation by the university substantiated claims of sexual violence and harassment against former athletic department employee Mohamed Muqtar, who was fired in May. Seven former Cal student-athletes said Muqtar abused them for nearly 20 years. \"Campus prevention and response efforts have increased in recent years,\" Cal's statement read. \"All university staff and all students are required to complete sexual harassment and sexual violence prevention training. In addition, the athletic department sponsors supplementary formal training for coaches, staff and student-athletes in sexual violence awareness and prevention, bystander intervention, and campus reporting procedures.\" Cal's athletic department does not have its own specific conduct process, nor does it investigate allegations or cases on its own, but it follows the university's policy and works in concert with campus professionals who are responsible for those areas, the school's statement said. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 8:41 Woman accuses Cal players, staff of harassment 3/3"} |
7,342 | Deal Hudson | Fordham University | [
"7342_101.pdf",
"7342_102.pdf",
"7342_103.pdf",
"7342_104.pdf",
"7342_105.pdf",
"7342_106.pdf",
"7342_107.pdf"
] | {"7342_101.pdf": "This is a beta version of Search: All Names for Search Deal Hudson Deal Wyatt Hudson Born: 30-Nov-1949 Birthplace: Denver Gender: Male Religion: Roman Catholic Race or Ethnicity: White Sexual orientation: Straight Occupation: Religion Party Affiliation: Republican Nationality: United States Executive summary: Karl Rove's favorite Catholic Deal Hudson, publisher of the Catholic news magazine Crisis, came to the attention of Karl Rove after he published an article recommending that the Republican party could garner Democratic Catholics if only the would reach out to regular churchgoers. From there it was just a short hop to an informal position on George W. Bush's 2000 Presidential campaign. In his capacity as informal adviser Hudson tutored Bush on the Catholic worldview and reportedly even vetted some of his more important speeches. In January 2003 Bush appointed Hudson to serve on the President's Council on Service and Civic Participation, along with such luminaries as Bob Dole, John Glenn, Cal Ripken, Steve Young, Cokie Roberts, Dixie Carter, Sean Astin, and Richard Parsons, among others. Hudson originally came from academia: formerly an associate professor of philosophy at Fordham University (1989-95) and then a visiting professor of medieval studies at NYU. He also chaired the Philosophy department at Mercer University, where he taught for nine years. It was while teaching at Fordham that Cara Poppas, one of Hudson's 18-year-old philosophy students, filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against the professor, claiming that he had sexual intercourse with her after she got drunk in a bar. The suit was reportedly settled out of court for $30,000, Hudson subsequently surrendered his tenure and started his life over in New York. The incident remained quiet for ten years, until the news broke in August 2004. Hudson promptly resigned from his informal post on Bush's 2004 campaign, declaring: \"While remain fervently committed to supporting President Bush's re-election think it best that no longer play a role as an adviser in this year's campaign.\" Interestingly, in September 2003 Hudson opined that the vexatious sexual molestation crisis afflicting the Catholic church was caused by -- yes, yes: those \"predatory homosexuals\" in the priesthood -- but also a general lack of doctrinal conformity think that dissent is the major cause of the sexual abuse crisis because it has loosened priests and laity alike from their core beliefs, and particularly the core beliefs about sexual morality.\" Formerly a Southern Baptist minister. 2/22/25, 8:43 Deal Hudson 1/2 Father: Jack Wyatt Hudson Mother: Mildred Emmie Deal Wife: Nancy Mae Myers (m. 31-Aug-1971, div., annulled 1982) Wife: (div., annulled 1986) Wife: Theresa Ann Carver (m. 29-May-1987) High School: Arlington Heights High School, Fort Worth University Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin Theological Divinity, Princeton University University: PhD, Emory University (1979) Professor: Fordham University (1989-95) Professor: New York University Professor: Mercer University, Atlanta Crisis Publisher Aspen Institute Mortimer Adler Fellow (1992-94) Capital Research Center Christian Coalition Catholic Alliance, Board of Directors Republican National Committee Santorum 2000 Sexual Harassment Lawsuit filed 1995, reportedly settled for $30,000 Converted to Catholicism Feb-1982 New Create a map starting with Deal Hudson Requires Flash 7+ and Javascript. Do you know something we don't? Submit a correction or make a comment about this profile Copyright \u00a92019 Soylent Communications 2/22/25, 8:43 Deal Hudson 2/2", "7342_102.pdf": "BishopAccountability.org Editor Mary Matalin Stands by Her Disgraced Potomac Man By Dermot McEvoy Publishers Weekly January 9, 2008 As chairman of the Republican National Committee's \"Catholic Outreach\" effort in 2004, Deal W. Hudson set himself up as the arbiter of Christian morality, questioning whether John Kerry should receive Holy Communion because of his pro-choice stance, asserting that the Pope really was for the war in Iraq and denouncing those who supported stem-cell research. And Hudson wasn't delicate in his tactics\u2014he got Ono Ekeh, a father of three, fired from his job at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Secretariat for African American Catholics for running a pro- John Kerry Web site. \"If you're going to play in the sandbox,\" Hudson said of Ekeh's firing, \"then you have to take the consequences of your public utterances and your public actions.\" All of which makes him the perfect person to write a book titled Onward, Christian Soldiers: The Growing Political Power of Catholics and Evangelicals in the United States, a manifesto coming in March from Threshold Editions, Mary Matalin's conservative imprint at Simon & Schuster. Perfect, that is, if\u2014as Threshold is betting\u2014the target audience of religious conservatives is willing to overlook a sex scandal that has twice derailed Hudson's career and that, coincidentally, is detailed in another new book, Politicus: The Strange and Scary Tribes That Run Our Government by Dana Milbank (Broadway Books). \"Deal Hudson has owned up to his actions and it does not undermine his contribution to activating conservative Christian voters, or the quality of Onward, Christian Soldiers,\" a spokesperson for the imprint told in an email. \"If books were published based solely on authors' past personal histories, there would be far fewer books indeed.\" In 1994, while he was a tenured professor at Fordham University, Hudson, who was married, had a sexual encounter with one of his female students, Cara Poppas, an 18-year-old freshman. Soon after, the student left Fordham and filed a sexual abuse suit. The claim against the school was eventually dismissed, but Hudson resigned and paid $30,000 to settle the case. Hudson seemed to have quietly put the incident behind him until 2004, when the then-powerful political operative was the subject of an expose in the National Catholic Reporter. According to the National Catholic Reporter, Hudson took Poppas out for a night of drinking with some other students. Later, in the evening, he brought Poppas, who by then was very drunk, to his office and initiated sexual contact with her. Milbank reports on the rise and fall of Hudson in Homo Politicus. \"Well had come across him before the National Catholic Reporter,\" Milbank told PW. \"[He was] someone would call frequently to ask about what's going on in the White House, what's going on in the Hill\u2014the same relationship had with Jack Abramoff. And then all of this exploded one day and unfortunately ended my use of Hudson as a source inside the White House. Not because of my lack of interest, but because they cut him off.\" Hudson once again resigned and today is less well-known that other subjects profiled in Homo 2/22/25, 8:43 Editor Mary Matalin Stands by Her Disgraced Potomac Man, by Dermot McEvoy, Publishers Weekly, January 9, 2008 1/2 Politicus, which include Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, Judy Miller, Donald Rumsfeld, Bernie Kerik and even President Bush. They are a breed Milbank calls the \"Potomac Man\"--alpha politicos more interested in serving themselves than the public. Threshold's editor-in-chief Mary Matalin, adviser to many of the powerful, including Vice President Dick Cheney and publisher of Karl Rove's forthcoming book, remains loyal to her former Republican colleague. \"Deal Hudson's contributions to advancing conservative ideas and idealism is seminal,\" she said in an email to have always felt privileged to work with him and honored to publish him.\" Hudson declined to talk to PW. But in a galley for Onward, Christian Soldiers, he owns up to past deeds: \"Prior to the 2004 election, in late August stepped down from my role as Catholic advisor to the White House and the left-wing Catholic newspaper that supported John Kerry published a lengthy expos about me on its Web site. The article contained documents from a supposedly sealed file at Fordham University, where as a philosophy professor had had a sexual encounter with a female undergraduate in February 1994. My wife already knew about it, but the public disclosure was devastating to my family, to those whom worked with at Crisis magazine, and to me acknowledge then, as do now, that was completely responsible for this incident, which deeply regret. Needless to say did not want this revelation to harm the president, so departed as quietly as the press would allow.\" He also goes on to talk about his career changes and concludes: \"In the aftermath of this horrific experience can see why was personally attacked.\" Milbank said he's not surprised by Hudson's refusal to let scandal keep him out of the limelight think he has lived,\" said Milbank, \"by one of the core principles of the Potomac Man\u2014just make sure they spell my name right. Absolutely, can't hurt him. Shame is something for other cultures.\" When told that the name of Hudson's new book was Onward, Christian Soldiers, all Milbank could utter was \"Oh, boy.\" He recovered enough to say, \"There's a long history in that deep vein of forgiveness that certainly runs through the modern religious conservative movement that's apparently more Protestant than Catholic. There are many other cases of people using their sin or moving on from sin to get some sort of a public recovery.\" And in some cases, a book deal. Any original material on these pages is copyright \u00a9 BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. 2/22/25, 8:43 Editor Mary Matalin Stands by Her Disgraced Potomac Man, by Dermot McEvoy, Publishers Weekly, January 9, 2008 2/2", "7342_103.pdf": "LF100LA Discharge Steadily We have an Warehouse in Germany, Fast Shipping, and a Delivery time of 5-7 Working Days Contact Us By David D. Kirkpatrick, New York Times Aug 19, 2004 Bush campaign adviser quits over prior sex case Deal Hudson, the publisher of the conservative Roman Catholic journal Crisis and the architect of a Republican effort to court Catholic voters, said he is resigning as an adviser to the Bush campaign because of a newspaper's investigation into accusations of sexual misconduct involving a student at a college where he once taught. Watch More Newsletters Sign in 2/22/25, 8:44 Bush campaign adviser quits over prior sex case 1/4 \"No one regrets my past mistakes more than do,\" Hudson wrote in a column posted Wednesday on the online edition of National Review announcing his resignation. \"At the time dealt with this in an upright manner, and the matter was satisfactorily resolved long ago,\" he wrote, without specifying the accusations. Hudson, 54, said he has been happily married for 17 years. Called for comment, he declined Article continues below this ad The investigation is being conducted by the National Catholic Reporter, according to some people who have spoken to the Catholic newspaper. At Fordham University, a Jesuit school in New York where Hudson taught from 1989 to 1995, a university spokeswoman confirmed that the episode had led to Hudson's resignation. The spokeswoman, Elizabeth Schmalz, said: \"Fordham followed its policy rigorously in this matter and initiated an investigation upon receipt of the student complaint. The professor later surrendered his tenure at Fordham.\" Schmalz added, \"Something inappropriate was done person involved with the university's investigation said that a female undergraduate in one of Hudson's classes reported to the university that, after she had become drunk at a bar, Hudson made sexual advances toward her. Hudson has been an influential adviser to President Bush and a close friend of the White House political strategist Karl Rove since the late 1990s. Hudson first caught Rove's attention by publishing a study in Crisis in 1998 arguing that Republican candidates could make inroads among traditionally Democratic-leaning Catholic voters by focusing on regular churchgoers, a strategy that dovetailed with Bush's emphasis on \"compassionate conservatism.\" 2/22/25, 8:44 Bush campaign adviser quits over prior sex case 2/4 Aug 19, 2004 David D. Kirkpatrick Hudson signed on as an adviser to Bush's 2000 presidential campaign. For the last four years, he has been a prominent participant in a weekly conference call held by the Republican National Committee each Thursday with influential Catholic supporters. William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said Hudson has played an almost indispensable role reaching out to Catholics for the White House. Donohue said Hudson's resignation will inevitably set back the Bush campaign's efforts with Catholic voters. \"He was the ultimate networker,\" Donohue said think it will be hurt because of the ties that Deal had.\" Around The Web Powered by Find Useful Knowledge By Ethereal Search Engine Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Changes By The New Normal of Selling a Home Today By 2/22/25, 8:44 Bush campaign adviser quits over prior sex case 3/4 The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy By Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Mind More Accessible to All By Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness By Stop Paying Too Much for Your Prescriptions - Compare Prices, Find Free Coupons, By Walmart Center for Racial Equity Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Justice By Four Ways Food Banks Are Feeding Kids Right Now By Let's Play Typeshift Really Bad Chess Flipart Cross|word SpellTower About Contact Services Quick Links \u00a9 2025 Hearst Communications, Inc. Terms of Use Privacy Notice Notice at Collection Your Privacy Rights (Shine the Light Industry Opt Out Your Privacy Choices (Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads) Top 2/22/25, 8:44 Bush campaign adviser quits over prior sex case 4/4", "7342_104.pdf": "\uf099 \uf16d \uf002 \uf0c9 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment | 12/31/2018 Fordham Offers \u201cNo Comment\u201d To Allegations of 1960\u2019s Clergy Abuse by Peter Mullin Co-Sports Editor with Bill Donahue Co-Editor-in-Chief (Originally published 11/19/2008) In April of 1994 an 18-year-old freshman walked into the office of the Dean of Fordham College at Rose Hill, a place that, according to the University\u2019s mission statement, concerns itself with fostering an \u201cenvironment that celebrates and protects the dignity of the human person.\u201d Inside the confines of that office the young woman started the process of protecting that dignity. She told the Dean a story of how, after a night of drinking in the city, her philosophy professor took advantage of her in his office. By the end of the semester, her professor had resigned. Ten years later that scene would come to national attention in an article by Joseph Feuerherd published in the National Catholic Reporter. The story detailed the alleged 1994 sexual misconduct of Deal W. Hudson, a top advisor to George W. Bush\u2019s 2004 re-election campaign, while he was a tenured professor of philosophy at Fordham. That July, Fordham spokeswoman Elizabeth Schmalz issued a statement to saying, \u201cSexual Harassment is not tolerated at Fordham University.\u201d It continued, \u201cFordham followed its policy rigorously in this case and initiated an investigation into the matter upon receipt of the student\u2019s complaint.\u201d The Dean in the article, described as \u201csympathetic\u201d and giving \u201cevery indication that he believed [the girl\u2019s] story,\u201d was Father Joseph M. McShane, S.J., Fordham University\u2019s current president. In 1994, it appears that he listened intently to the aggrieved student and quickly iniated actions to remove Mr. Hudson from his position. And in 2004, Father McShane presided over the University when it publicly and explicitly denounced sexual harassment after the allegations against Mr. Hudson surfaced in the media. Why then, after compassionately and publicly dealing with a case of alleged sexual harassment, did Father McShane and Fordham University take a seemingly different approach in handling another, more recent allegation of sexual abuse on campus? Why have they remained so silent Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 1/6 As reported in the New York Times on October 21, 2008, a pair of advocacy groups for victims of clergy sex abuse say that two Jesuits accused of molesting children were sheltered on campus well after Fordham was made aware of the situation. The groups\u2013the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests and BishopAccountability.org\u2013held a press conference on Fordham Rd. outside of Murray-Weigel Hall, the infirmary for the New York Province of the Society of Jesus. According to the organizers, that event was the first time the accusations against Rev. Eugene J. O\u2019Brien, S.J., a former President and Principal of the Fordham Preparatory High School, and Rev. Roy A. Drake, S.J., a former science teacher at the Prep School, were made public. Father O\u2019Brien is accused of molesting a former Fordham Prep student over a period of several years, starting when the alleged victim was a student at the high school from 1964 to 1966. The alleged victim, a 58-year-old who spoke at length to the paper on the condition of anonymity, said that the priest molested him on numerous occasions, including several of which he claims occurred during a trip through Europe with Father O\u2019Brien and five other Prep students don\u2019t know if was raped or penetrated, but was violated,\u201d Father O\u2019Brien\u2019s accuser told the paper. \u201cHe would jump in the bed with me and would just shut down, close my eyes and go somewhere else,\u201d he said of the man he recalled as \u201ca real father figure.\u201d After the alleged incidents of sexual molestation, the now-middle aged man said he \u201cjust repressed it all,\u201d even to the point that he allowed Father O\u2019Brien to perform his marriage ceremony. The alleged victim also claims to have had an encounter with Father Drake in the Fordham University Seismic Observatory, next to Freeman Hall. Inside the observatory, Father Drake attempted to molest him was literally running around in circles around this table to get away from him until could escape.\u201d He repressed the memories until 1997, when he met a counselor for victims of clergy sex abuse who, he says, helped him go through the process of bringing his allegation to the attention of the University was after an apology, some kind of an explanation to what had happened,\u201d he said. According to a copy of a 1997 settlement available online, the ensuing lawsuit involving Father O\u2019Brien was settled for $25,000. In addition to the Jesuit priest, the New York Province of the Society of Jesus, the Archdiocese of New York, Fordham University, and Fordham Prep were named in the settlement and released from any \u201cpast, alleged or actual, current and future liabilities.\u201d When the paper attempted to confirm the terms of the settlement by contacting the office of Rev. Thomas R. Slon, S.J., the executive assistant to the head of the New York Jesuits who spoke with the Times, he was unavailable for comment. Peter Feuerherd, a communications consultant for the Province who spoke with the paper, said he was not familiar enough with the situation to comment. In the Times article, Father Slon would neither confirm nor deny the terms of the 1997 settlement regarding Father O\u2019Brien. Joseph Zwilling, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of New York, when asked by the paper to confirm the terms of the settlement, said the Archdiocese \u201ccould not find anything in the files.\u201d According to the anonymous accuser, the most emotional day of his life came when he met Father O\u2019Brien again in 1997. At that meeting, Father O\u2019Brien blamed his actions on alcohol abuse and would not apologize wanted an Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 2/6 admission of guilt,\u201d the alleged victim told the paper. He says he was never concerned with taking the Jesuits down. \u201cIt\u2019s [about] accountability,\u201d he said. * * * An anonymous source who was interviewed by the paper for this report claims he was raped and sodomized by Father Roy Drake in 1968. In extensive interviews with the paper, this source said Father Drake provided him with alcohol and then raped him in the bedroom of the Jesuit\u2019s apartment on Fordham\u2019s campus when he was 13 years old. The alleged attack occurred the night before a weekend ski trip to Hunter Mountain that the 8th grader was invited to go on by a friend who went to Fordham Prep. Though he says he was able to keep the incident secret until 2002 or 2003, when the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in archdioceses nationwide he says he wondered what had happened to Father Drake. In 2005, after two years of searching, he says he found Father Drake listed on the Internet as living at Murray-Weigel Hall. In October of that year, he had his attorney inform the Jesuits and Fordham University in writing of Father Drake\u2019s presence on the campus of Fordham University. According to the advocate group Bishop-Accountability.org, Father Drake resided in Murray-Weigel from 1994 until some point in 2006. He notified the school in order \u201cto remove Father Drake from any proximity and contact with high school and college kids,\u201d the source said. \u201cIf can protect one, or two, or five kids, whatever ages would be providing a service,\u201d he continued. In October 2007, he was assured by the head of the New York Province that \u201cRoy Drake is not in a position of access to minors.\u201d Though it is believed that Father Drake died this past August, the paper has been unable to ascertain exact details about his whereabouts during the final few years of his life or even a confirmation of his death. According to BishopAccountability.org, in 2006 he was transferred to a sexual abuse treatment center in Missouri. But a fall 2006 Jesuit newsletter describes Father Drake as a liaison between the residents of Murray-Weigel Hall and a construction company performing renovations. Finally, an August newsletter from the Jesuits of the Missouri Province lists Father Drake\u2019s death as occurring on August 21 in the Bronx. But in the Times article, Father Slon of the New York Jesuits would not confirm that Father Drake had died. * * * * In April of this year, Pope Benedict made his first trip to the United States. The Holy Father raised eyebrows across the country with his repeated acknowledgements of the pain and suffering that plague the many American Catholics whose lives have been affected by the clergy sexual abuse scandals of the last decade am deeply ashamed and will do whatever is possible so that this does not happen in the future,\u201d said the Pope just before landing in the United States for his April visit, the reported. \u201cIt is more important to have good priests than many priests. We will do everything possible to heal this wound.\u201d In regards to the Pope\u2019s statements in the United States, Father McShane told the Times, \u201cNone of us expected it, but everyone is grateful that he did. What he realized is that this is a pastoral visit and he must be pastor to those who are hurt most \u2014 and that is the victims.\u201d Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 3/6 With the Pope in town and Father McShane on the front page of the Times, the anonymous source felt it was time to contact Fordham once more. In a letter obtained by the paper, dated May 8, 2008, the alleged victim asked the university president to \u201creach out in a pastoral and healing manner\u201d to prove to him that his and the Holy Father\u2019s words were more than \u201chollow and deceitful pronouncements.\u201d Eight days later, Father McShane responded with a short, 58-word letter that acknowledged the alleged victim\u2019s letter, but simply referred him to his lawyer regarding \u201can amicable resolution of this matter.\u201d The letter\u2019s recipient was less than pleased. Calling the response he received \u201cgarbage,\u201d he terms the treatment he has received from the University, Fordham Prep, and the New York Province since he first reported his incident three years ago \u201clike ripping a scab off an old wound.\u201d Five months later, he decided to go public with these accusations, and soon he and the leaders of his supporting advocacy groups were standing on Fordham Road. \u201cFor three years wanted to give Fordham, the Archdiocese, and the Jesuits every opportunity to do the right thing,\u201d he told the paper. \u201cThey have done absolutely nothing in three years.\u201d * * * * As of press time, Fordham University has remained silent. The official university response came from Bob Howe, Fordham\u2019s Director of Communications, who declined to comment, citing school policy. The Province and the Archdiocese have also chosen not to comment. And the office of the President of Fordham Preparatory School, Rev. Kenneth Boller, S.J., did not return the paper\u2019s request for an interview. When the paper again attempted to contact Fordham, this time after discovering the public statement given by the school in 2004 regarding the sexual harassment allegations involving Mr. Hudson, the response was the same. \u201cWe\u2019re not commenting,\u201d said Mr. Howe. And thus the question remains. Why have the school and its administration chosen to handle this affair in secrecy? Why, when the university has shown in recent history an ability to openly and efficiently deal with a public situation of sexual harassment, can it not find the means to do the same in this case? Indeed, this entire ordeal raises quite a few questions about transparency in Fordham University\u2019s administration. But from the looks of it, we\u2019re not about to get any answers 2008 Melania Trump\u2019s White House Christmas Spectacular Weakened Women\u2019s March Still Packs a Political Punch Glen Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 4/6 07/12/2019 at 2:04 pm am sorry the original article is no longer available on line. The comments made over the years by those personally impacted were interesting and went a long way to understanding the depravity of these priests Leave a comment ANTI\u2026 Welcome to the paper, Fordham University\u2019s free speech journal for news, analysis, comment, and review. Fighting the man since 1972 US! Pitch us your article ideas via this fancy link right here ARTICLES!!! Or come to our weekly meetings at McGinley 2nd floor, every Tuesday at 9pm TWITTER! My Tweets Select Month An Incredibly Definitive List of (some of) the Pride Flags We Found God on Yelp Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 5/6 Follow the paper \uf203\uf202\uf215 Website Powered by WordPress.com. Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy 2/22/25, 8:44 Fordham\u2019s Silent Treatment \u2013 the paper 6/6", "7342_105.pdf": "Also by Joe Feuerherd To get the story behind this story, read today's Washington Notebook, Joe Feuerherd's weekly Web column on NCRonline.org. From the Editor By Tom Roberts Deal Hudson, the influential Catholic publisher and political operative, attempted, in his words, \"to get a head start\" on a story that Washington correspondent Joe Feuerherd has been working on for more than four months. Hudson's ploy was to write a National Catholic Reporter The Independent Newsweekly Breaking News This week's stories | Home Page Posted Thursday, August 19, 2004 at 1:57 p.m The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bush's Washington By Joe Feuerherd Washington Editor's note: Deal Hudson announced Aug. 18 that he would be giving up his position with the Republican National Committee in reaction to questions posed by \"a liberal Catholic publication.\" In recent days has tried repeatedly to meet with Hudson to get his response to questions about his departure from Fordham University in 1994 following allegations of an inappropriate sexual relationship with a freshman female student. The university said Hudson \"surrendered\" his tenure. He also paid a settlement of $30,000 to terminate a lawsuit that the student brought against him on the basis of these allegations. This past March 17, having paid tribute to the saint who drove the snakes from Ireland, George W. Bush - - first lady to his left, Irish prime minister to his right -- bounded off the Roosevelt Room podium. As he began to work the crowd of Irish Americans and Gaelic-wannabees, the president noticed a familiar face, a fellow Texan, among those assembled at the annual St. Patrick's Day White House gathering. \"Immediately after George Bush spoke,\" recalled former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican Ray Flynn, \"the first person he greeted was Deal Hudson.\" Heady stuff, perhaps, to be the first among the gathered Catholic glitterati to be singled out by the most powerful man in the world. But by now Hudson -- publisher of the conservative Catholic monthly Crisis, Bush political operative, and one-time philosophy professor -- was accustomed to the treatment. Hudson, a 54-year-old, thrice-married former Baptist minister, is a regular White House visitor, a leading Bush campaign Catholic proxy, and a widely quoted partisan unafraid to use his pen to serve the Bush cause. In more than two dozen interviews conducted by over a four-and-a-half-month period, mostly with former friends and Hudson's ideological kin, a complicated portrait emerged. Though few of those interviewed would speak on the record, many of them painted a far less flattering picture of Hudson than his public moralizing would suggest, and several raised questions about the allegations that ended his academic career. Still, Hudson does not shy away from the political limelight. In May he told the Washington Post that Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry should be denounced from the pulpit \"whenever and wherever he campaigns as a Catholic.\" Politics and religion fully meshed earlier this year when Hudson led an effort to oust a low level employee, Ono Ekeh, from his job at 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 1/12 response to a yet-unpublished story. (See link below.) He was able to place the response on the Web site of National Review, the conservative magazine. As an aside find it intriguing that National Review would allow its Web site to be used in such a fashion. The publication to which Hudson referred was never named; no one ever called to confirm whether we were doing a story or to determine the nature of the piece. The National Review allowed Hudson to characterize the unpublished story -- which was still in the process of being written -- as an unfair look at his personal life. He raises an important issue, and it deserves to be addressed. All of us, as Hudson put it, have done things in our lives that we regret. But not everyone is a public figure, seeking the spotlight and rubbing elbows regularly with the most powerful in the land. Most of us don't regularly publicly denounce those whose personal behavior we think deficient; fewer still have the power to get someone fired for maintaining a political Web site because we disagree with its content; or to claim with some validity that we are responsible for getting like-minded Catholics appointed to positions of power at the highest levels of government. Rarer even are those among us who think our lives important or interesting enough to pen confessional memoirs before reaching retirement age. Hudson was understandably proud of his achievements, and he wields his power with a bravado that rarely shuns the limelight. That's one of the reasons we decided to do a profile. Feuerherd did what any responsible journalist working on a profile would do -- he talked to friends and colleagues who knew the subject in a variety of situations, professional and personal. That's when the ugly chapter at Fordham University came to light. We sent Hudson documentation on the incident and told him we would like to speak to him face-to-face to get his response. He chose not to, responding instead through another publication's Web site. The material (which became the subject of a lawsuit) showed a clear abuse of his authority as a teacher involved with an 18-year-old freshman girl in one of his classes and is certainly relevant to the story of someone whose political and public mission relies heavily on public moralizing, often about personal sexual ethics. It was Hudson himself who wrote that it is a \"lie that a person's private conduct makes no difference to the execution of their public responsibilities don't agree with him entirely since think the private conduct of adults, particularly the activity of peer consenting adults, is their own business. It becomes a matter of concern when the conduct is not among equals, but involves a relationship where one of the two is clearly in a position of authority and responsibility. Tom Roberts is editor, his e-mail address is: [email protected]. the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Secretariat for African American Catholics (NCR, April 23) because Ekeh hosted a \"Catholics for Kerry\" Web site. \"Look,\" wrote Hudson in his widely circulated e-mail column, \"it's one thing for a Catholic to be a pro-life Democrat -- that in itself is a perfectly legitimate position and consistent with our Catholic faith. However, it's completely unacceptable to follow Ekeh and trade away our pro-life responsibilities.\" Ekeh was forced to resign. Politics aside, did Hudson have any personal regret that Ekeh, a father of three young children, had lost his job? Not in the least. \"If you're going to play in the sandbox,\" Hudson told NCR, \"then you have to take the consequences of your public utterances and your public actions.\" In a recent fundraising letter, Hudson pledged that Crisis would be taking \"a close [emphasis in original] look at some of the bishops who are allowing their local politicians to get away with\" the \"deception\" of calling themselves Catholic while voting for abortion rights. \"They [the bishops] are scared of him, afraid that he's going to attack them,\" says a leading Republican Catholic layman with close ties to the American hierarchy. Hudson's rise to influence and his status as public arbiter of Catholic morals is all the more remarkable given that almost 10 years to the day of the 2004 St. Patrick's Day celebration, the then-Fordham University philosophy professor stood accused of breaching the bounds of the professor-student relationship. According to documents obtained by NCR, Hudson invited a vulnerable freshman undergraduate, Cara Poppas, to join a group of older students for a pre- Lenten \"Fat Tuesday\" night of partying at a Greenwich Village bar. The night concluded after midnight in Hudson's Fordham office, where he and the drunken 18-year-old exchanged sexual favors. The fallout would force his resignation from a tenured position at the Jesuit school, cost him $30,000, and derail a promising academic career. It threatened public disgrace. But that was not Hudson's fate. Instead, he got another chance -- and made the most of it. *** 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 2/12 Deal Hudson's Statement The following was posted to the Web site of National Review Aug. 18: The Price of Politics: Getting ahead of a potential distraction Deal Hudson Power in Washington is directly related to access -- the ability to get phone calls taken by influential senators, key cabinet officers, top name journalists, well-wired lobbyists , and, most important, access to that disembodied entity known as the \"White House.\" Hudson's got A-list access. On Jan. 8 he was in the East Room for a presidential meeting with leaders of the National Catholic Educational Association. Later that month, on the day of the annual antiabortion March for Life, Hudson hosted the kick-off of the Republican National Committee's \"Catholic Outreach\" effort, where his leadership was praised by Chairman Ed Gillespie. The previous month, Hudson joined William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, former Reagan and Bush speechwriter Peggy Noonan, Kathryn Jean Lopez, associate editor of National Review magazine, and Vincentian Fr. David O'Connell, president of Catholic University, for a Roosevelt Room presidential briefing. On May 26, Hudson was one of nine conservative religion writers who joined Bush in the Oval office for an interview prior to the president's meeting with Pope John Paul II. That's the Deal Hudson Washington knows. Largely unfamiliar to the capital's movers and shakers just five years before, he has parlayed his position at the once-sleepy Crisis into significant influence on both church and state. He's respected by some, feared or disliked by many across the ideological spectrum, but taken seriously by all those who watch Catholic machinations in the capitol. Today, his columns and e-mail missives can get a staff person at the U.S. bishop's conference removed from a job or force a response from the conference's general secretary on the bishops' commitment to support the Federal Marriage Amendment; a year ago, his pique over a meeting between some American bishops and a group of \"dissidents\" led leaders of the U.S. Catholic hierarchy to spend a day with their conservative critics. He summarized his relationship with the Bush administration in a Nov. 2003 letter to Crisis supporters continue to lead an informal Catholic advisory group to the White House, as well as communicate with various White House personnel almost every day regarding appointments, policy, and events. These efforts have helped to place faithful, informed Catholics in positions of influence.\" While there's an element of publisher self-promotion and puffery in Hudson's letter, he was telling the truth. \"He's probably the most prominent lay Catholic [recognized] by the Bush Administration,\" says Flynn. Says a conservative Catholic activist: \"The White House has a Catholic strategy and its name is Deal Hudson.\" From his perch at Crisis, Hudson transformed himself into a classic Washington power broker -- counseling the administration on appointments and dispensing opinions from his modest row house basement office in tony Dupont Circle. It wasn't his first such transformation. *** 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 3/12 Deal Wyatt Hudson was born Nov. 30, 1949, in Denver, the only son of Mildred Emmie Deal (hence the unusual moniker) and Jack Wyatt Hudson. He was raised in Fort Worth, Texas. It was, Hudson recalled in his 2004 memoir, an \"ordinary middle-class upbringing\" though, apparently, not without its bumps. In American Conversion, Hudson, by then a philosophy professor at Atlanta's Mercer University, recalled his first visit to a Catholic confessional. \"We spent much time talking about my parents and my sisters had not realized until then how much baggage had been carrying around since my Forth Worth days had always been told a burden would be lifted in confession, but wasn't prepared for the demons that were released that day.\" Graduated from Fort Worth's Arlington Heights High School in the late 1960s, Hudson entered the University of Texas-Austin. \"Like all teenagers entering adult life,\" recalled Hudson thirsted for the bonds of genuine fellowship to compensate for the kind of disappointment most of us experience in family life found this fellowship in a Southern Baptist Church.\" In American Conversion, Hudson describes the summer of 1971. He and a group from Atlanta's Ridglea West Baptist Church traveled to the Mexican village of San Benito, where he found himself questioning the goal of \"converting\" the Catholic townspeople. Later that summer, on Aug. 31, Hudson married Nancy Mae Myers, an event that merited no mention in American Conversion. Hudson pursued his master of divinity at Princeton Theological Seminary in the early 1970s and was \"licensed to preach,\" though his doubts about the Baptist approach to things aesthetic was emerging. \"Something seemed wrong,\" he wrote later, \"about a Christian outlook that excluded all the world's greatest writers and artists from the conversation about truth.\" At Atlanta's Emory University Hudson pursued his PhD and served as associate minister at Atlanta's Druid Hills Baptist Church. He oversaw the youth ministry. \"He ran a fantastic youth group,\" recalled John Strickland, a 46-year-old member of Druid Hills who, as a teenager, first encountered Hudson. \"He had a very dynamic presence and he cared about the kids,\" said Strickland. \"He had his hands full\" with homework clubs, Sunday school and Bible study, trips, summer Bible school, and socials. The group met in the church's youth center, dubbed the \"upper room.\" The teenagers performed a controversial Christmas play in which Herod's slaughter of the Holy Innocents was depicted. \"The Catholic imagination at that time had grown accustomed to seeing biblical stories embellished by theatrical, often funny and bawdy, treatment,\" Hudson wrote. But it was a little much for the more conservative Baptists. \"The elders of the church were not used to having that type of thing presented,\" agreed Strickland. Hudson engaged the teenagers in discussions about films and novels -- further raising eyebrows among those Baptists who viewed the Bible as the sole source of genuine wisdom. Later, as chairman of the Mercer University Philosophy Department, and at Fordham, his innovative teaching methods and conservative outlook became a Hudson trademark. That same dynamism was evident at Emory. At the university's prestigious Institute of the Liberal Arts, Hudson made his mark. Former classmates recall a charismatic presence -- a gifted conversationalist, first- rate intellect, and a sophisticated charmer. His first marriage dissolved in Atlanta (\"she'd just had it with him,\" recalled one classmate) and a second one was short lived. Hudson alludes to the time in his 2004 memoir. \"About a year before my [1982] conversion was jolted by the sudden departure of someone loved but whose love had not treated well. The hurt was compounded by my sense of failure spent many months in a daze hoping to win her back but without any progress was to blame and knew it.\" 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 4/12 Meanwhile, his spiritual journey was leading to Catholicism, one of a particularly orthodox bent. \"He was increasingly expressing conservative and right wing Christian theological positions,\" recalls a classmate. Yet Hudson was not only embracing conservative Catholicism, but a belief system that allowed him to explore faith expressed in art, music, philosophy and, not least, literature. Evelyn Waugh, Sigrid Undset, Walker Percy, Flannery O'Connor, Georges Bernanos were among the authors he read -- \"one after another\" -- as he grappled with Catholicism. But \"of all the novelists read on my way into the church,\" wrote Hudson, \"none touched me more deeply than Julian Green\" whose novels \"reflect [the] struggle between sexual desire and the desire for God.\" Hudson was awarded a doctorate in 1979 and joined the faculty at Mercer. \"He was a very fine teacher \u2026 because he had some very innovative ideas for engaging his ideas \u2026 and students were interested in approaching philosophy and theology through topics that had natural interest to them,\" Peter Brown, a 33-year veteran of the Mercer University Philosophy Department told NCR. Hudson, recalled Brown, dared to discuss love and beauty, areas that \"professional philosophers quite often don't think should be dignified\" in an academic setting. Hudson was deeply influenced by French Thomist Jacques Maritain. \"His distinction, drawing upon Aristotle, between the habits of art and prudence allowed me to make an argument to my Southern Baptist students about why they were being asked to read novels such as Flaubert's Madame Bovary and Walker Percy's Love in the Ruins in my classroom,\" wrote Hudson. Further, recalls Brown, as chairman of the Philosophy Department Hudson took courageous stands for academic integrity. In a battle over reorganizing the university, Hudson \"was not afraid to take the lead with his colleagues or his students\" and made sure \"that the voice of liberal arts was strongly heard,\" said Brown. Hudson was received into the Catholic church in February 1982. On May 29, 1987 Fr. Raymond Peacock, assistant pastor of Atlanta's Christ the King Parish, presided at the wedding of 37-year-old Hudson and Theresa Ann Carver, an actress with a master in fine arts from the University of Alabama. Given his marital track record, Hudson later told friends, his father demanded the couple sign a prenuptial agreement. Hudson received annulments -- the first in 1982, the second in 1986 -- for the two marriages, a Crisis spokesperson told NCR. *** Newly married and recently published (Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend, Mercer, 1988), Hudson joined the Fordham University philosophy department faculty in 1989. He flourished in the South Bronx ivory tower where philosophy is not an afterthought or elective, but an essential element of the Jesuit core curriculum. Hudson's academic stock was rising. He published two books (The Future of Thomism, Notre Dame, 1992; Sigrid Undset On Saints and Sinners, Ignatius, 1994). As a Fellow at the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies, he wrote introductions to reprints of Mortimer Adler's The Difference of Man and the Difference it Makes (Fordham, 1993) and The Time of Our Lives: The Common Sense of Ethics (Fordham, 1995). He received tenure and taught part-time at New York University. Some recall tensions -- Hudson was perhaps the most theologically and politically conservative member of the moderate-to-liberal dominated department. Others, however, found him engaging and friendly, sharp of mind and quick of wit with a southern-style flirtatiousness (he occasionally wore a Stetson hat to 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 5/12 Cara Poppas class) that charmed. He and his wife became part of the Fordham circle -- socializing at their Mt. Vernon home or at those of his faculty colleagues, sharing intimacies and intellectual interests as well as university gossip. He was popular with students. And then, in early 1994, it began to fall apart. In January of that year Cara Poppas signed-up for a Hudson philosophy class. An 18-year-old freshman from Portland, Maine, Poppas had been in-and-out of foster homes from the age of seven. The fourth of nine children, her mother an alcoholic and her father a troubled and disabled Vietnam veteran, Poppas had a difficult childhood will not go into all of the negative issues, times, situations, etc.,\" her high school guidance counselor told Fordham in support of her application to the university, \"but rest assured that they were indeed the most trying of situations where the greater majority of those who find themselves in these types of situations often stumble and fall and are then consumed.\" Poppas barely survived her first semester in the South Bronx. She had followed her high school boyfriend to Fordham but they broke up that fall. Her grades were terrible. She returned home to Portland for Christmas break and in January returned to the Bronx, struggling but determined to succeed in the new year. Ten years later, the slight and athletic Poppas, during a June 30 interview in her hometown, recalled that she signed up for Hudson's class because it met the requirements of Fordham's extensive core curriculum. Initially, she loved the class -- sitting in the front row, actively engaging in discussions. It was a bright spot at a difficult time. In early February 1994, class concluded, she approached Hudson with a question. He suggested, she said, that they go to his office and discuss it told him everything about me,\" Poppas recalled in a four-page document she provided to Fordham administrators at the conclusion of the semester. \"He knew was a ward of the court, without parents, severely depressed, and even suicidal discussed with him why had lost my faith in God, in humanity, and in myself. He was extremely attentive and genuinely concerned.\" On February 15, \"Fat Tuesday,\" Poppas again visited Hudson at his office. \"He was in high spirits, telling me of how he had searched far and wide for the best marguerite [sic] in town,\" Poppas wrote. Hudson would be meeting a group of students at Tortilla Flats, a popular West Village bar where, according to a current review, \"friendly waiters sometimes surprise you with free shots of tequila.\" Would Poppas care to join him was very reluctant,\" wrote Poppas, who, at age 18, was still three years shy of the legal drinking age knew would be the youngest, as well as the newcomer to their frequent gatherings,\" she wrote. \"He promised not to tell the others my age decided to go.\" Poppas arrived at approximately 6 p.m. \"Five of us sat around the table, Dr. Hudson definitely controlling the conversation\u2026 . Dan (young man from class) was told to be ready with a lighter to light any lady's cigarette when she wanted to 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 6/12 smoke\u2026 . Jay (another young man from class) had to make sure all glasses remained full from the marguerite [sic] pitcher.\" The party progressed. More people arrived. The festive crowd played Bingo -- a Tortilla Flats Tuesday night tradition. \"Being that our group consisted of about ten people, we won most often. Shots of tequila would be brought in rounds to our winning table. We kept winning, and rounds of shots kept being brought.\" \"As we grew more and more drunk, stranger and stranger things began to occur,\" wrote Poppas. Hudson had his arms around two students, said Poppas. \"Dr. Hudson was heavily French kissing both girls, alternating from one to the other\u2026 .\" One of the students, wrote Poppas, suggested \"body shots\" -- where \"a girl places the salt on her neck, and the lime in her breasts. Then, the guy tastes the salt from the neck, takes the shot, and eats the lime from the girl's cleavage. Dr. Hudson performed a body shot with [one of the students].\" The group left the bar around midnight. Arms locked, drunk and staggering, they dispersed. Hudson and Poppas took a cab to the Metro North train station, headed, she thought, back to Fordham was completely in Dr. Hudson's hands,\" recalled Poppas. \"Not only was unable to stand up had no idea as to how to get home.\" In the taxi \"Dr. Hudson began pulling me close,\" according to Poppas. \"On the train, he began to feel my breasts outside my sweater and coat. We missed the Fordham stop (I'm not sure whether on purpose or not). We went to his house, he put me in his car, and he went up to tell his wife he was bringing a student back to Fordham.\" Once in the car, said Poppas, \"Dr. Hudson told me to lay my head on his lap, suggesting fellatio when he unzipped his zipper did both sat up and said 'Hold on a second, wait just a minute\u2026' He replied 'Yes, let's wait till we get to my office.'\" At Fordham, \"He took me into his office, laid his long coat down, and laid me down on top of it. He began touching me, unzipping my jeans and pulling up my shirt was just glad to be laying down could barely feel my body.\" Hudson performed a sexual act on Poppas. He asked her to reciprocate, which she did. \"Then he took me to Sesqui, my dorm,\" recalled Poppas. The next day, Poppas continued, Hudson telephoned and asked her to lunch. He took her to McDonald's in the South Bronx. \"He told me \u2026 not to tell anyone, which promised to. In my eyes was the one who had done wrong was the one who had acted disgustingly.\" Following the short Easter break, Poppas -- ashamed, angry, and confused -- returned to her usual seat at the front of Hudson's class, having told no one about the Fat Tuesday incident. The class, recalled Poppas' friend and classmate Colleen Freda, was reading Walker Percy's The Thanatos Syndrome, a sexually explicit novel. Freda thought it strange, if harmless, that Hudson wanted the students to read particularly graphic passages aloud in class, she told NCR. Poppas, however, thought Hudson was sending not-so-subtle messages right at her. 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 7/12 Poppas stopped attending Hudson's class and, for that matter, most of her other classes. She spent hours curled up in her bed -- not confiding the reason for her downward spiral to Freda or other friends, she told NCR. Hudson, said Poppas, was trying to contact her -- calling on the phone, sending notes back to the dorm. Poppas hid. Eventually, Poppas confided the \"Fat Tuesday\" episode to a faculty member who advised her to inform Fordham's administration about Hudson's conduct. On April 28, 1994 Poppas met with Jesuit Fr. Joseph McShane, the college dean (and now the university's president). McShane appeared sympathetic and, Poppas recalled, gave every indication that he believed her story. He told her the university would deal with Hudson once the semester concluded, said Poppas. Poppas was asked to write a detailed description of what had transpired between her and Hudson. On May 9, she submitted that document to the university counsel. The semester concluded, Poppas met with university president Fr. Joseph O'Hare. He asked her, she recalled, how the situation could be rectified. \"One of us should have to leave,\" responded Poppas, \"and it shouldn't be me.\" O'Hare told her, she recalled, that he would take care of the situation. \"Sexual harassment is not tolerated at Fordham University,\" the school's assistant vice president for public affairs, Elizabeth Schmalz, said in a July 2004 statement provided to NCR. \"It subverts the mission of the University and threatens the well-being, educational experiences and careers of students, faculty and staff. It is especially disturbing in the context of a teacher-student relationship.\" Continued Schmalz: \"Fordham followed its policy rigorously in this case and initiated an investigation into the matter upon receipt of the student's complaint. The professor later surrendered his tenure at Fordham.\" Hudson declined NCR's request to comment on his relationship with Poppas, saying Aug. 13 through a spokesperson that he \"left Fordham to become the publisher and editor of Crisis magazine in Washington, DC, and expressed to various [Crisis] board members his desire to move his family south and try a career outside academia.\" In response to additional questions from NCR, Hudson, in an Aug. 18 e-mail, said through an aide: \"The matter about which you have inquired has been satisfactorily resolved between all parties and we have agreed that no more may be said about it.\" That same day, writing in National Review Online, Hudson released his response to this story, which was still being written. He refused to meet with an reporter to answer questions personally. *** Michael Novak, an intellectual leader of Catholic neoconservatives, along with University of Notre Dame professor of medieval studies Ralph McInerny, launched Catholicism in Crisis in 1982. The publication provided a voice for conservative critics of the American hierarchy at a time when the U.S. Bishops Conference was preparing pastoral letters on war and the economy. As the American bishops moved to the left politically, Crisis (as the name would eventually be shortened to) argued the morality of nuclear deterrence, supported Ronald Reagan's policies in Central America, and defended U.S.-style capitalism against its critics. Theologically, Crisis was conservative, backing Pope John Paul and critical of those whose interpretations of the Second Vatican Council differed from those offered by Rome. Over the years, the magazine's contributing editors and publication committee would become a who's who of conservative Catholicism: papal biographer George Weigel, Nurturing Network president Mary Cunningham Agee, former Drug Czar William Bennett, former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski J. Peter 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 8/12 Grace, former Secretary of State Alexander Haig, former baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn, former U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican Thomas Melady, Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan, novelist Walker Percy, former Treasury Secretary William Simon, and political activist Paul Weyrich among them. Despite this illustrious pedigree, the magazine was near financial ruin on any number of occasions. For all his theoretical support for capitalism, Novak was no businessman. \"Emergency dinners\" and frantic appeals to supporters to keep the publication afloat were common. The strains of piecing together 11 issues a year had grown tiresome, he told friends, as was the constant need to raise funds to keep the small-circulation magazine afloat. (Novak declined to comment for this article). That's where Hudson entered the picture think I've got someone who can make it work,\" Novak told a leading Catholic layperson in 1994. Hudson became senior editor in October 1994, editor in March 1995. *** While Hudson was taking over the reigns at Crisis, Cara Poppas consulted an attorney. Arriving back at Fordham for the fall semester, she discovered that the bulk of her financial aid had been withdrawn due to poor academic performance. She was broke. Poppas blamed her downward academic spiral on the incident with Hudson. She filed suit against Fordham (a claim that was eventually dismissed) and Hudson. Hudson, recalled Poppas, offered $10,000 to settle his case. She refused. In early 1996, Hudson offered to settle for $30,000, one-third of which would go immediately to her attorney, the remainder to her in quarterly installments. Poppas' attorney suggested she take the deal. She agreed. *** Hudson, meanwhile, moved quickly to transform Crisis. Though the publication's message would remain the largely the same, it took on a more professional air. Under the tutelage of National Review publisher Edward A. Capano, Hudson learned the publishing business. The former philosophy professor had, it seemed, an untapped entrepreneurial streak. He secured support from the right-leaning Bradley and Scaife foundations that would total more than six figures; Domino's Pizza, owned by conservative Catholic activist Tom Monahan, signed up for 1,000 subscriptions. Hudson further boosted circulation through improved professional direct mail solicitations and raised the magazine's profile by hosting radio and television programs on the Eternal World Television Network. The drably designed monthly became a four-color glossy and established an Internet presence. Fundraising was no longer a matter of last-ditch solicitations to stave off financial disaster, but a series of well-planned and well-attended \"partnership dinners,\" golf outings, and cruises. Hudson hosted an annual Crisis cruise -- subscribers got the opportunity to hobnob with Catholic celebrities such as Novak, Fr. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, the Catholic League's William Donohue, former baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn, political consultant and former Christian coalition president Ralph Reed, and Franciscan University of Steubenville chancellor Fr. Michael Scanlan. The number of paid staff increased from three to 10. Ownership of the publication was transferred to the Morley Institute, a non-profit created by Hudson and named after Lucile Morley, a Hudson great aunt who 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 9/12 encouraged his youthful interest in philosophy. Today, circulation stands at approximately 27,000, up from 6,500 when Hudson took over a decade ago, and the $1.8 million budget is nearly four times its 1994 counterpart. Some former staff members recall an exciting and busy time think what impressed me about Deal was his ability to work quickly and very well,\" recalled Gwen Purtill, an early Hudson hire who served as the magazine's art director. \"He could do in a couple of hours what it would take a lot of people days to do,\" said Purtill. \"We were always trying to pin him to his chair to get an answer out of him, because he was always on the go.\" Through it all, Hudson wrote -- his monthly Sed Contra column led each issue of the magazine sampling: \"Catholics who consider themselves moderate are being duped by the rhetorical evasions, the liberal masquerade, of postmodern dissidents.\" \"Multiculturalism as it is being practiced promises to be more exclusionary and more prejudicial than any form of education the West has ever known.\" \"Golf remains the only major sport to resist the thug element infiltrating our public life.\" \"The culture, it is clear to see, is still reeling from the bad taste of thirty years ago.\" At the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandals, Hudson took on Bill Clinton. \"Over and over again, we hear on the talk shows that we shouldn't hold the president to a 'higher standard would argue quite the opposite\u2026 . Those who are not willing to bear the burden of these higher standards should not seek office\u2026 . After we have stripped away all idealism from offices that bind our culture together -- president, father, husband -- what will be left for us to aspire to? Who will want to sacrifice personal desires for public responsibilities?\" Of his daughter's reactions to the scandal, Hudson wrote that \"she is being imbued with the lie that a person's private conduct makes no difference to the execution of their public responsibilities. It's this lie, alive in our culture of death, that has shaped the character of Bill Clinton and encouraged the moral softness in all of us.\" In 1998, Hudson invested $75,000 of Crisis funds to conduct a poll on the political attitudes of American Catholics. That investment transformed him into a significant political player in Washington -- a man who had the ear of both the president and Karl Rove, Bush's chief political strategist. *** The essential finding of the survey was that regular mass attendees were more likely to vote Republican than those who attended less often or not at all. Such Catholics, wrote Hudson of the frequent church- goers, \"were found to be moving out of the Democratic Party, where they had long been entrenched, and instead becoming the swing voters in any given election.\" Hudson shopped the poll results around to that year's crop of Republican presidential candidates. Only Rove took an interest. Hudson was summoned to Austin and briefed then-governor George W. Bush on the findings. \"These Catholics are attracted to the ideas of compassionate conservatism: work permits for immigrants, protection of the unborn, tuition vouchers for schoolchildren,\" Hudson wrote later. \"They want government out of Catholic institutions and evidence that the president is fighting the general moral decay they see in society. The answer is not to vacillate on these issues in the hopes of attracting greater numbers but to demonstrate that he will be a champion for life and those policies he already supports.\" 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 10/12 Bush and Rove liked both the message and the messenger. Hudson was named to head the Republican National Committee's \"Catholic Outreach\" effort in the 2000 campaign. *** With Crisis on sounder financial footing and George W. Bush and Karl Rove in the West Wing, Hudson found himself in a position of real influence. The perception that Hudson controls Catholic access to the White House is widespread, largely accurate, and the cause of considerable resentment within conservative Catholic circles. When the new president wanted to meet with Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick in early 2001, Hudson was asked to carry the invitation. Hudson was a vocal defender of the president's Iraq policy, his comments frequently juxtaposed with Pope John Paul II's statements of opposition to the war for reporters seeking the \"Catholic take\" on the march to war. On Thursday mornings, Hudson participates in the White House's \"Catholic call\" -- where a revolving door of Catholic conservatives provide telephonic feedback to Tim Goeglein, Rove's assistant, and help the White House strategize on such \"Catholic issues\" as Bush's faith-based initiative, education vouchers, judicial nominations, abortion, gay marriage, and stem cell research. The one constant of the weekly call, in addition to Geoglein, is Hudson. Hudson gets credit for sponsoring a host of presidential appointments -- both substantive and ceremonial. Peter Schaumber, a Bush-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board, was backed by Hudson. Hudson was a member of the U.S. delegation appointed to commemorate Pope John Paul II's twenty-fifth anniversary and former Crisis development director Ann Corkery was named a U.S. representative to the United Nations General Assembly. On the church front, Hudson's public complaints last year that members of the U.S. bishops had met \"secretly\" with a group of \"dissidents,\" led the committee members to agree to a meeting of Hudson- organized conservative Catholics. That group prodded the bishops to stop honoring pro-choice Catholics through appointments to church boards and commissions. Meeting in June 2004 in Denver, the full body of bishops put that commitment in writing. There are indications, however, that Hudson is wearing thin with his ideological brethren. Some consider him disloyal, pointing to a November 2003 Boston Globe Magazine article in which Hudson was reportedly critical of Fr. John McCloskey, an Opus Dei priest popular in conservative circles who until recently headed the Washington Archdiocese's Catholic Information Center. \"Deal Hudson does not like John McCloskey,\" wrote the Globe's Charles Pierce. \"Before saying anything about him, and nothing that's good, Hudson turns off a reporter's tape recorder,\" wrote Pierce. There are Republicans who worry that the Bush Administration is taking political advice from a neophyte. \"Hudson wouldn't know a Catholic voter if he ran one over,\" says a conservative Catholic who doubts the ability of a Texas-born Protestant to relate to the culture and concerns of ethnic Catholics in such battleground states as Pennsylvania and Ohio. These concerns were expressed by the conservative American Spectator, which questioned why Bush didn't make an appearance at the well-attended Catholic Prayer Breakfast in April, held just blocks from the White House. \"There continue to be rumblings that the White House and its Catholic surrogates fail to reach out in even small ways to Roman Catholic groups,\" according to the Spectator's \"Washington Prowler\" online column. \"'You look at states like Ohio and Pennsylvania,' says a longtime Catholic activist in Washington, 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 11/12 'and you wonder, who is speaking to the Irish Catholic, the Italian Catholic, the ethnic Catholic? It sure isn't this White House and it sure isn't the people they have trying to do Catholic outreach.'\" On Aug. 18, Hudson quit his post as an adviser to the Republican National Committee on Catholic issues. \"While have no intention of being dissuaded by personal attacks will not allow low-brow tactics to distract from the critically important issues in this election,\" he wrote on the website of National Review. He was referring to this article. It may be time for yet another transformation. Joe Feuerherd is Washington correspondent. His e-mail address is [email protected] National Catholic Reporter, August 19, 2004 This Week's Stories | Home Page | Top of Page Copyright \u00a9 2004 The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company, 115 E. Armour Blvd., Kansas City 64111 All rights reserved. TEL: 816-531-0538 FAX: 1-816-968-2280 Send comments about this Web site to: [email protected] 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal: How a Philosophy Professor With a Checkered Past Became the Most Influential Catholic Layman in George W. Bu\u2026 12/12", "7342_106.pdf": "Home ( > Features ( > Religion & Spirituality ( The Real Deal Crisis Mudslinging is not a Gospel Value 9, 2004 There\u2019s been yet another casualty in the culture wars that have raged in the United States over the past decade. On August 18, 2004, Deal Hudson, publisher of the conservative Catholic journal, Crisis , resigned his position with the Bush campaign as an adviser on how to court the Catholic vote. The scandal surrounding Hudson stems from an accusation of sexual misconduct with a female student approximately ten years ago at Fordham University where he was a tenured philosophy professor. This might not even merit a mention, considering the lurid personal tales that the American public has been treated to over the past few years (Bill Clinton, William Bennett, and James McGreevey come to mind), but Hudson\u2019s case is particularly interesting because, unlike some other public figures, his ability to operate in a political sphere is based in large part on his credibility in moral matters. Hudson is a convert to Catholicism who has turned his enormous passion and zeal for his faith into an inroad into right wing politics. The fact of the matter is you can\u2019t be a Christian without being intimately familiar with hypocrisy. In the late 1990s, Hudson published a study that discussed how Republicans could lure church-going Catholics away from the Democratic Party. Karl Rove, George W. Bush\u2019s chief political strategist, signed Hudson on to help with the 2000 presidential campaign and now counts him among his close friends. Hudson, in turn, has tried to marry Catholic teachings to some of the ideals of the Republican Party and, in the process, began lambasting anyone in the Church who dared to question his version of Catholic orthodoxy. Deal Hudson was an insider who sat in judgment of the worthiness of others and pushed everyone who didn\u2019t measure up to the outside. For someone who worships a God who once said \u201clet he who is without sin cast the first stone\u201d Hudson certainly seems to have done a lot of stone throwing in his day. In much the same way that Jimmy Swaggart\u2019s indiscretions so many years ago held a certain satisfaction for anyone who was sickened by his self-righteous moralizing, it is tempting to rejoice in the downfall of someone like Hudson. But how many more scandals need to be made public before we\u2019ve had our fill? The fact of the matter is you can\u2019t be a Christian without being intimately familiar with hypocrisy. The gospels are filled with stories of religious and political leaders who are blind to their own arrogance and abuse of power. Jesus\u2019 own disciples betrayed him; even Peter, the \u201crock\u201d upon which Jesus built his church denied knowing him three times. The real question should not be why do these scandals continue to occur but why are we still shocked by them instead of being surprised that they don\u2019t happen more often? 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 1/6 What if Deal Hudson\u2019s fall from grace is not a joyful occasion for those of us who disagree with him, but an opportunity to help complete the story? Certainly a person\u2019s character is important (former Louisiana state representative David Duke\u2019s membership in the was definitely a relevant bit of personal information) but character assassination is an entirely different matter. Will our desire for making a tawdry sport out of moral superiority ever be exhausted? Even the institutional church itself has swung wildly from its former practice of protecting predatory priests to now showing no mercy and, arguably, restricting the right of due process toward priests who have simply been accused of wrongdoing. Even though Deal Hudson\u2019s misdeeds have now landed him on the outside of Pennsylvania Avenue looking in, that isn\u2019t necessarily the end of the story. Fortunately for us, those gospel narratives of betrayal and sin are incomplete without mercy, forgiveness and redemption. What if Hudson\u2019s fall from grace is not a joyful occasion for those of us who disagree with him, but an opportunity to help complete the story? Not long ago, Ono Ekeh ( , the founder of a \u201cCatholics for Kerry\u201d online discussion board was a target of Hudson\u2019s wrath. Ekeh, at the time, was working at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and, in Hudson\u2019s judgment, working for the bishops and supporting John Kerry were simply incompatible. Moreover, he took Ekeh to task for \u201cgoing so far as to defend Kerry against the explicit directives from the Vatican.\u201d Because of Hudson\u2019s very public pressure (the story was published in newspapers around the country), the Bishops asked Ekeh to resign his position. ith all that\u2019s happened to him, Ekeh wouldn\u2019t need to justify a desire to dance on Hudson\u2019s grave in jubilation, but that\u2019s not the case think it is all unfortunate because it never should have come to this\u201d said Ekeh just after Hudson\u2019s bad news became public know firsthand that it is a very uncomfortable experience to be the subject of unwanted and unfavorable attention, to put it mildly. While passionately disagree with him on many things take no pleasure in watching Hudson and his family, go through a difficulty like this hope the lesson here is that we can all disagree about politics, doctrine and other things, but remember that, in the end, we are all children of the same Father.\u201d Though Hudson\u2019s demise was due to his own actions, perhaps, in a sense, we all share in the blame when we choose to contribute to a culture of polarization by gleefully picking sides and gearing up for war. Ekeh\u2019s response reminds us that when we wield the weapons of mercy, forgiveness, dialogue, and inclusion, the inevitable end to battle does not necessarily have to be mutual destruction. bush campaign ( catholic teachings ( deal hudson ( fordham university ( jimmy swaggart ( karl rove ( moral matters ( william bennett ( 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 2/6 Deacon Mike Hayes ( Deacon Mike Hayes was ordained for the diocese of Cleveland in 2024 and is assigned to St. Christopher\u2019s Parish in Rocky River, OH. He serves the diocese as both Director of Young Adult Ministry and the Bishop\u2019s Delegate for Interfaith and Ecumenical Relations. He\u2019s also the host of 5 Questions with the Paulists ( and the podcast Question of Faith ( podcast). Deacon Mike is one of the founders of Busted Halo and has worked with young adults his entire ministry career in retreat, spiritual direction, and campus Ministry. He\u2019s the author of \"Googling God\" (Paulist, 2007) and \"Loving Work\" (Orbis, 2012). Deacon Mike and his wife Marion live in Lakewood with their dog, Vito. @godgoogler ( ( You Are Loved: 6 Bible Verses for Single People ( people) ( 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 3/6 Struggling With Envy? Two Remedies for the Second Deadly Sin ( second-deadly-sin) ( 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 4/6 Tweet This ( Sh (htt // f b k / h / h h ? htt //b t dh l /j lt/f b 22 202 (HTTPS://BUSTEDHALO.COM/JOLTS/) ( utm_source=sidebar) ( Sign up for weekly updates from Busted Halo ( u=0c3bccd05c5908a5144b5f04b&id=b41e7d93c7) 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 5/6 about ( contact us ( write for us ( job openings ( advertise ( shop ( subscribe ( privacy ( \u00a9 2025 Busted Halo , All rights reserved Sign up for weekly updates from Busted Halo ( manage.com/subscribe? u=0c3bccd05c5908a5144b5f04b&id=b41e7d93c7) \u00ae 2/22/25, 8:44 The Real Deal Crisis - Busted Halo 6/6", "7342_107.pdf": "The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) November 2004 We\u2019ve been surprised by how many people do not know about the revelation of Deal Hudson\u2019s sexual debauchery. The story hit The New York Times on August 19, as well as many other papers around the country. We immediately got a phone call from one of our writers asking us to say nothing about it, because Hudson\u2019s career was now totally ruined. We heard from another that, while the punched him out when he was standing tall, we really wouldn\u2019t want to kick him when he\u2019s down and out. So we followed that advice. But, lo and behold, Hudson\u2019s career wasn\u2019t ruined, and, while he wasn\u2019t exactly standing tall, he wasn\u2019t down either. He continued on as Publisher of Crisis magazine. Moreover, certain of Hudson\u2019s allies jumped to his defense. For example, the Publisher of Our Sunday Visitor (Sept. 12) wrote a piece titled \u201cKing of the Dung Heap: Voracious Appetite for Scandal Demolishes Reputations and Eliminates Genuine Debate.\u201d Said the Publisher: \u201cWe live in an age of scandal\u2026. It titillates and destroys\u2026. Scandal does not mind who it brings down, so long as the appetite for expos\u00e9 is fed. The weapon of scandal has been used effectively in Catholic circles few weeks ago, Deal Hudson\u2026became another casualty of the scandal wars\u201d (italics added). You see, it wasn\u2019t Hudson\u2019s fault \u2014 he\u2019s the victim. Rather, it was the \u201cvoracious appetite 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 1/6 for scandal\u201d in \u201cCatholic circles\u201d which is at fault. Did the Publisher of the Visitor scold Hudson for his debauchery? Not in the least. He only scolded the public, in this case the Catholic public. So we knew we had to say something about Hudson \u2014 and we hoped this would be the last time we ever have to say anything about him. Because Hudson knew in advance that a story was coming out about aspects of his sexual and marital life, he decided to pre-empt the story \u2014 at National Review Online on August 18. It was a wise move. However, he didn\u2019t come clean, so it didn\u2019t work. According to Hudson\u2019s pre-emptive strike \u201creporter asked for an interview\u201d and \u201cthe questioning was all political, all about my support for President Bush.\u201d But \u201cno story appeared.\u201d Then the reporter \u201ccalled me asking for another interview saying his story had taken a \u2018surprising turn.\u2019 In reply, my office e-mailed him asking for the questions he wanted me to answer.\u201d The questions included those \u201cabout past annulments for my marriages before my conversion to the Catholic Church\u2026and allegations from over a decade ago involving a female student at the college where then taught.\u201d As for his two divorces, Hudson doesn\u2019t mention that he was a Southern Baptist minister at the time. As for those \u201callegations,\u201d he doesn\u2019t tell us what those \u201callegations\u201d were about. (It turns out that those \u201callegations\u201d were sexual, and they were far more than mere allegations.) Hudson implies that his divorces can be overlooked because of his conversion to the Catholic Church (a questionable assumption), but what about those 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 2/6 \u201callegations\u201d? Were they before or after his conversion? He doesn\u2019t say. (Actually, they were after his conversion, and while he was on his third and current wife.) Nowhere does Hudson admit to any moral failings or sins; instead he speaks three times of his \u201cmistakes.\u201d This is Inside the Beltway lingo, which is where Crisis is located. In justification for his pre-empting the story, he says: \u201cIn matters of this nature, exaggeration, half-truths, and rumor often tend to overtake the truth \u2014 and wanted the truth to get a head start.\u201d (After the full story on him came out, however, he made no claims that the story contained exaggerations, half-truths, or rumors.) Hudson goes on to say that \u201cbecause need to protect the people love and the causes believe in think it best that no longer play a role as an advisor [to President Bush] in this year\u2019s campaign.\u201d (But he did not resign his position as Publisher of Crisis. Given his own words, this would seem to mean that the Catholic cause is not something he really believes in.) So, what does the story about Hudson say? What The New York Times and other papers reported on August 19 was largely based on Hudson\u2019s account and was only the tip of the iceberg. The full story, a lengthy one, appeared in the National Catholic Reporter (Aug. 27; it was posted online on Aug. 19 [after The New York Times story] at nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn081904.htm and with a supplementary story at national catholicreporter.org/washington/wnb081904.htm). 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 3/6 The interview by the reporter, as Hudson says, was about Hudson\u2019s political beliefs. But Joe Feuerherd, the reporter and the author of the National Catholic Reporter (NCR) piece, fills in the rest: \u201cInterview completed planned to make a few phone calls \u2014 the perfunctory due diligence a reporter undertakes when working on such a story \u2014 and write the piece promised it to my editor for the next issue of the paper. But as started to make those phone calls, red flags flew. Few of Hudson\u2019s ideological soul mates \u2014 people who\u2019d known him at least since he came to Crisis\u2026 \u2014 would speak for attribution. Cautiously, however, they said unflattering things. Hmm. These were conservative Catholics\u2026. Hints, and sometimes more, were dropped about his past and his present. Check out why he gave up a tenured position in Fordham\u2019s philosophy department, several sources suggested. More calls. More of the same called my editor and told him I\u2019d need more time \u2014 perhaps a lot more time \u2014 to complete the story\u2026. Over four- and-a-half months conducted more than two dozen full-fledged interviews and had at least that many more casual conversations went where the story led me.\u201d According to Hudson, it was only a matter of \u201callegations\u201d from a female student. We have already indicated that those \u201callegations\u201d were sexual. So we\u2019re in the omnibus realm of sexual harassment. But could this merely be some hyperfeminist girl alleging \u201csexual harassment,\u201d which might be something so innocent as a touch on the shoulder? It\u2019s important, therefore, to know what kind of \u201csexual harassment\u201d this was. Feuerherd interviewed the girl on June 30 to find out what exactly happened. Feuerherd also recounts a graphic four-page description of what happened, that the girl had provided to the \u201ccollege\u201d Hudson speaks of (actually, it was Fordham University). Feuerherd also wanted to 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 4/6 hear Hudson\u2019s side of the story, so on five separate occasions between August 9 and 16, Feuerherd requested an interview with Hudson, but Hudson declined to be interviewed, saying that he would not respond to what he called \u201crumors.\u201d What Feuerherd learned about Hudson is vile and repulsive, but it must be told to understand the gravity of the matter (if you don\u2019t want to read about it, skip over the next four paragraphs). The girl, Cara Poppas, \u201chad been in-and-out of foster homes from age seven.\u201d At Fordham she signed up for one of Hudson\u2019s classes. In early February 1994, she approached Hudson with a question after class. Hudson suggested they go to his office to discuss it. She told Hudson about herself, that, in her words, \u201cshe was a ward of the court, without parents, severely depressed, and even suicidal.\u201d Poppas then visited Hudson at his office on February 15, 1994, Fat Tuesday. Hudson was in high spirits, and he said he\u2019d be meeting a group of students at a West Village bar, and asked Poppas to join him. Feuerherd reports was very reluctant,\u2019 wrote Poppas, who, at age 18, was still three years shy of the legal drinking age knew would be the youngest, as well as the newcomer to their frequent gatherings,\u2019 she wrote. \u2018He [Hudson] promised not to tell the others my age decided to go.'\u201d 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 5/6 Enjoyed reading this 2/22/25, 8:44 The Crisis At Crisis Magazine (Part II) | New Oxford Review 6/6"} |
7,916 | David Hirsch | Western Washington University | [] | {} |
8,165 | Brian Carroll | Central Washington University | [
"8165_101.pdf",
"8165_102.pdf"
] | {"8165_101.pdf": "Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald Central professor's relationships raise questions Emry Dinman Staff Writer Carroll By 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 1/73 | December 7, 2018 2:00 \u2014 When does an inappropriate relationship become sexual harassment? An internal Central Washington University investigation sheds light into how the university nearest to the Columbia Basin answers that question, and how it investigates possible sexual misconduct. On Nov. 17, 2017, a month after an internal investigation found Central Washington University professor Brian Carroll had violated university conflict of interest policies by failing to disclose two sexual relationships he had with students, Carroll attempted to tender his resignation. University officials initially did not accept the resignation. Dean of the College of Arts and Humanities Todd Shiver, who would later tell union representation that Carroll's actions were tantamount to sexual harassment, informed Carroll the same day that Carroll would instead be terminated. Shiver did not respond to a request for comment, and it's unclear whether Carroll attempted to resign before or after learning of the dean's decision. #placement_716784_0_i{width:100%;margin:0 auto;} #emp-action{margin-bottom: 10px;}.amp-action img { width: auto;} What is clear is that five months later, after intervention from the faculty union and despite resistance from university officials, Carroll won out: he was able to resign, the university was forced to withdraw and expunge his termination from its records, and he received a letter of 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 2/73 recommendation. University officials were directed to reference only this letter of recommendation if prospective employers inquired about Carroll, according to a resignation agreement between Carroll and the university. Carroll worked in CWU's Department of History from 2010 to 2017, earning tenure in 2016. He was involved with the university's American Indian Studies program for five years and was the director of the program from 2016 to late 2017. The investigation into Carroll's behavior focused on the professor's failure to disclose sexual relationships with two female students, referred to in the report as Student 1 and Student 2. Carroll's relationship with Student 1 lasted from January 2016 to August 2017, including five months when she was a student at CWU. While Student 1 did not take classes from Carroll during this time, he was her advisor during at least a part of their relationship. Carroll also traveled with her in an official capacity and oversaw in some capacity her employment at a nearby historical society, where Carroll officially represented CWU, during their relationship, according to the investigatory report. Carroll's relationship with Student 2, which he described to the investigator as \u201ca fling,\u201d lasted three weeks in August 2016, after she had graduated and before she re-enrolled. She took classes with Carroll both before the relationship began and after it ended, according to the investigatory report. Carroll failed to disclose the potential conflict of interest when the student took another class with him after the end of the relationship, in violation of university policy policies regarding \u201cfamily or intimate\u201d relationships between professors and students indicate that faculty shall not \u201cgrade, supervise or direct the educational endeavors\u201d of such a student without written authorization by the Dean of the college. But Carroll chose not to disclose the relationships in order to protect his marriage, he told university officials. Carroll's wife also taught in the program, and the two sometimes co-taught classes. Carroll argued in his defense that he and Student 1 worked between themselves to mitigate any conflicts of interest, and that his relationship with Student 2 occurred while she was not enrolled and rules regarding disclosing past relationships were unclear. He also argued that he did not help Student 1 get a job at the historical society, and that his role there was irrelevant to his duties as a professor at CWU. Though at least one anonymous female student told investigators that the program was going to \u201cimplode\u201d due to Carroll's affair with a student involved with the program, the investigator did not consider it to be an official complaint of perceived preferential treatment, and the investigation concluded there was not sufficient evidence that any student's Title rights were violated. But despite the consensual nature of the relationships, Carroll's behavior may have violated the civil rights of other students, said Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a civil rights lawyer and founder of Champion Women, an organization that advocates for equity for women and girls in sports. \u201cConsent is not a factor,\u201d Hogshead-Makar said. \u201cParticularly when it comes to academics, in many cases these are zero-sum games, which means that if someone is going to get an advantage, someone isn't going to get one.\u201d If evidence of a civil rights violation could have been found with further investigation, the 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 3/73 investigator did not look any further. \u201cWhile further investigation... would provide more information,\u201d wrote investigator Gail Farmer in her final report, \u201cit would also certainly cause disruption to both the History Department and the Program, and could negatively impact the academic environment for current students.\u201d This is indicative of an institution attempting to shield itself from litigation, said Hogshead-Makar. \u201cWhat they're saying is they don't want to alert somebody that they may have a cause of action, that they may be able to sue the university for allowing sex discrimination,\u201d Hogshead-Makar said. Farmer is employed by the university as the Equal Opportunity and Talent Acquisition Manager and did not respond to a request for comment. In other cases has sought an independent investigator to oversee these formal investigations, including in the recent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct against Rep. Matt Manweller, R-Ellensburg, who was employed until recently at as a tenured professor of political science. In grievances filed to the university, United Faculty of Central, the union that represents faculty, argued that had not found that any sexual harassment or Title violation had occurred, and therefore could not simply fire the history professor. But Shiver rejected the grievance, arguing that Carroll's behavior constituted sexual harassment. \u201cAlthough the investigation reports appears to reach a different conclusion understand this conclusion as referring only to the ostensibly consensual nature of the relationships with Students No. 1 and No. 2,\u201d Shiver wrote in response. \u201cThe report states no conclusions addressing the hostile working and learning environment created for others in the program as a result of Professor Carroll's sexual activities.\u201d Shiver also noted that Carroll only disclosed his behavior when it was clear \u201chis indiscretions were about to be publicly exposed.\u201d In response to a second grievance Provost Katherine Frank said that Carrol had \u201ccaused serious damage to his academic program,\u201d and that the school's focus should be on \u201crepairing the damage.\u201d The case was eventually brought to arbitration, and in mid-April the university agreed to accept Carroll's resignation. Along with it was a letter of recommendation touting Carroll's abilities as a professor and signed by Frank. \u201cIt's called passing the trash,\u201d Hogshead-Makar said. Frank was not immediately available for comment. Carroll Investigatory Report (PDF) Other CWU:Carroll Documents (PDF) Around the Web 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 4/73 Stop Information Overload Ethereal Search Engine Heartwarming Reaction From a Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for the First Time Walmart Center for Racial Equity Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Justice Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 5/73 How Long Should Keep My Car? Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com Why Google Workspace for Business is Worth the Upgrade Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Limone at Home Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 6/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 7/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 8/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 9/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 10/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 11/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 12/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 13/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 14/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 15/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 16/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 17/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 18/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 19/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 20/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 21/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 22/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 23/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 24/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 25/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 26/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 27/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 28/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 29/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 30/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 31/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 32/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 33/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 34/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 35/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 36/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 37/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 38/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 39/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 40/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 41/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 42/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 43/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 44/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 45/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 46/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 47/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 48/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 49/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 50/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 51/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 52/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 53/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 54/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 55/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 56/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 57/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 58/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 59/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 60/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 61/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 62/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 63/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 64/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 65/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 66/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 67/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 68/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 69/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 70/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 71/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 72/73 2/22/25, 8:45 Central professor's relationships raise questions | Columbia Basin Herald 73/73", "8165_102.pdf": "Features Book Excerpts About Submissions Follow Us: Source: Columbia Basin Herald / Historians in the News / 12-7-2018 History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now. Sign up for the Newsletter Subscribe Learn More First Name Last Name Email Address * Weekly Feature Weekly Roundup With support from the University of Richmond 2/22/25, 8:45 Tenured historian, fired over sexual harassment charges, allowed to resign instead \u2014 History News Network 1/3 Tenured historian, fired over sexual harassment charges, allowed to resign instead When does an inappropriate relationship become sexual harassment? An internal Central Washington University investigation sheds light into how the university nearest to the Columbia Basin answers that question, and how it investigates possible sexual misconduct. On Nov. 17, 2017, a month after an internal investigation found Central Washington University professor Brian Carroll had violated university conflict of interest policies by failing to disclose two sexual relationships he had with students, Carroll attempted to tender his resignation. University officials initially did not accept the resignation. Dean of the College of Arts and Humanities Todd Shiver, who would later tell union representation that Carroll\u2019s actions were tantamount to sexual harassment, informed Carroll the same day that Carroll would instead be terminated. Shiver did not respond to a request for comment, and it\u2019s unclear whether Carroll attempted to resign before or after learning of the dean\u2019s decision. What is clear is that five months later, after intervention from the faculty union and despite resistance from university officials, Carroll won out: he was able to resign, the university was forced to withdraw and expunge his termination from its records, and he received a letter of recommendation. University officials were directed to reference only this letter of recommendation if prospective employers inquired about Carroll, according to a resignation agreement between Carroll and the university. Carroll worked in CWU\u2019s Department of History from 2010 to 2017, earning tenure in 2016. He was involved with the university\u2019s American Indian Studies program for five 2/22/25, 8:45 Tenured historian, fired over sexual harassment charges, allowed to resign instead \u2014 History News Network 2/3 years and was the director of the program from 2016 to late 2017. ... Read entire article at Columbia Basin Herald 2025 RESERVED. Subscribe to the Newsletter Brought to you by 2/22/25, 8:45 Tenured historian, fired over sexual harassment charges, allowed to resign instead \u2014 History News Network 3/3"} |
7,467 | Eric Dannenmaier | Northern Illinois University | [
"7467_101.pdf",
"7467_102.pdf",
"7467_103.pdf",
"7467_104.pdf",
"7467_105.pdf",
"7467_106.pdf",
"7467_107.pdf",
"7467_108.pdf"
] | {"7467_101.pdf": "Northern Star Advertisement 14\u00b0 and Clear Sky | Gentle Breeze \uf39e \uf16d \ue07b Northern Illinois University\u2019s student media since 1899 Search ... \uf002 Ensure student journalism survives. Donate today. Trending: Housing Guide Campus News News Opinion Sports Lifestyle More Express Yourself Northern \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f UPDATE: Sexual harassment allegations lead to former College of Law dean\u2019s resignation By Ian Tancun & Lindsey Salvatelli July 17, 2017 DeKALB | Two sexual harassment complaints filed by two former employees against Eric Dannenmaier, former College of Law dean, are at the center of his recent administrative leave and subsequent resignation. The two complaints, filed with Feb. 15 by the former College of Law employees, detail allegations of repeated unwelcome sexually graphic comments from Dannenmaier to former coworkers and students. The two individuals who filed the complaints provided the Northern Star with copies of the investigation reports they received. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement The timeline features the key events leading up to the resignation of Eric Dannenmaier, former College of Law dean. Dannenmaier is continuing his work at in the Division of Research and Innovation Partnerships. \uf24dGallery | 1 Photos \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f The two former employees who filed the complaints will be referred to using the aliases Ronda and Megan to hide their identities, as the investigations concluded they are likely the victims of sexual harassment. Affirmative Action investigations were conducted by officials to determine if there was \u201csufficient evidence\u201d Dannenmaier created a hostile working environment for Ronda and Megan. The findings were shared in confidential memos from Sarah Adamski, associate director of Investigations, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance, to Ronda and Megan. Copies of the memos were originally obtained by Above the Law, a legal news website published by Breaking Media, July 11. The investigations \u2014 which included interviews with Dannenmaier and other faculty members and students \u2014 found \u201cit is more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed [Ronda and Megan] by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace,\u201d according to the April 15 confidential memos. The investigations documented a history of sexually explicit comments allegedly made by Dannenmaier to Ronda and Megan. One of the complaints detailed a dinner between Dannenmaier and Ronda on Aug. 19. Dannenmaier allegedly asked various sexually explicit questions about her sexual history and preferences, including \u201cif you touch yourself sexually and what you think about when you do,\u201d according to the memo. During that same dinner, he also allegedly made references to male semen, including asking whether Ronda \u201cbelieved vegetarians \u2018swallow\u2019 (in a reference to swallowing male semen)\u201d and \u201csuggesting girls told him that male \u2018semen\u2019 tasted different if he were a vegetarian,\u201d according to the memo. Dannenmaier was interviewed by Adamski and Title \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f Dannenmaier was interviewed by Adamski and Title Investigator Michelle Johnson Feb. 22 and March 9. During those interviews, the allegations made by Ronda regarding the Aug. 19 dinner \u2014 as well as other sexually explicit statements he allegedly made \u2014 were ones Dannenmaier \u201cwas not able to categorically \u2018deny\u2019 as indicated by his repeated response that he \u2018did not recall\u2019 making the alleged statement,\u201d according to the memo. During the course of the investigation, it was discovered Dannenmaier allegedly made \u201csimilar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff\u201d which corroborated the allegations made in the Feb. 15 complaints. The investigations found Dannenmaier also allegedly made sexually suggestive remarks to a student in his Constitutional Law class. Further corroborating the complaints made on Feb. 15 were a series of contradictory statements made by Dannenmaier during the course of the investigations. Dannenmaier initially told investigators the Aug. 19 dinner between him and Ronda did not include any discussion of a sexual nature. He later told investigators the conversation that evening \u201cincluded a \u2018number of topics, including sex,\u201d according to the memo. Dannenmaier\u2019s story changed on more than one occasion, while Ronda and Megan \u201cprovided consistent testimony during the course of the investigation,\u201d according to the memos. Other faculty and staff members who witnessed interactions between Dannenmaier and Ronda and Megan \u2014 without being provided any details about the complaint \u2014 provided testimonies that verified the complaints filed. Before resigning from NIU, Ronda and Megan expressed their objections to Dannenmaier\u2019s alleged misconduct. Furthermore, the memos state both Ronda and Megan \u201cdid not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking Dannenmaier i l ti t f l t \u201d \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature.\u201d Despite Ronda and Megan expressing their objections to his alleged conduct, \u201cDannenmaier continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after you explicitly informed him \u2026 that the conduct was sexual in nature [and] made you feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures,\u201d according to the memo. Ronda said she filed the complaint against him a week or two before her last day at NIU, thinking the investigation would not begin until after she had left, according to her interview with the Northern Star. That was not the case, however, as she said immediately took action, as they felt the situation was egregious enough to get the investigation started right away. She said other people came forward to express similar comments they had heard from Dannenmaier, at which point she realized this problem was more widespread than she thought. The investigations found \u201cDannenmaier\u2019s unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature was so severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for you,\u201d according to the memos. Ronda and Megan both opted to move out of state without having a job secured in their new locations as a direct result of Dannenmaier\u2019s alleged conduct, according to the memo. Dannenmaier was \u201ctruly shocked\u201d by the allegations made because he said Ronda and Megan contradicted the notion of a \u201chostile work environment\u201d by their behaviors and statements, as noted by Anne Kaplan, vice president of Outreach, Engagement, and Regional Development during a review of the record, according to \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f his June 27 resignation letter. His comment about being \u201ctruly shocked\u201d is one that Ronda finds hard to believe. \u201cAny reasonable person would know that the comments that he made were absolutely inappropriate,\u201d Ronda said. In his resignation letter, Dannenmaier expressed a belief the allegations were \u201cwithout merit,\u201d but he decided to take a temporary leave during the investigation to eliminate any conflict that would prevent him from \u201csupporting\u201d the College of Law. Dannenmaier resigned June 27 but is temporarily working to complete a project with the Division of Research and Innovation Partnership that will \u201ccreate an area of excellence in the fields of environmental law and policy, which eventually will inform policy at the local, state and national level,\u201d said spokesperson Joe King. Dannenmaier, who began as dean June 1, 2016, was placed on voluntary administrative leave following the Feb. 15 complaint made to the Human Resources Office. King said Dannenmaier is expected to leave the university once he completes his project with the Division of Research and Innovation Partnership on or before Dec. 31. Officials are aware the memos have surfaced but are unable to confirm or deny facts due to pending litigation, King said. Dannenmaier was granted a request for an injunction Friday that prohibits the university from releasing his information officials did not provide any documents related to Dannenmaier\u2019s misconduct to the Northern Star. Dannenmaier did not respond to a request for comment. eric dannenmaier joe king niu niu college of law \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f \u00a9 2025 \u00a9 Copyright 2025 Northern Star - All Rights Reserved Pro WordPress Theme by \u2022 Log in eric dannenmaier joe king niu niu college of law sexual harassment title ix The Northern Star is the student-produced, independent media at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, Illinois, and is a limited public forum whose content is determined exclusively by its student editors. Information presented on this website and in its print products is not controlled by administration, faculty or staff. The Star publishes online at northernstar.info and sends out its newsletter Mondays through Fridays while class is in session during fall and spring semesters. Our Coverage News Campus City Sports Lifestyle About Us Staff Apply to the Northern Contact Us Submit a News Tip Submit a Letter to the Get Our Newsletters Your email address ... Sign Up Daily Headlines Daily Recap Alumni Recap \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f", "7467_102.pdf": "( Law Dean Resigns Over Hostile Work Environment Allegations By William Vogeler, Esq. on June 30, 2017 | Last updated on March 21, 2019 Maybe Eric Dannenmaier ( dannenmaier.shtml), former dean at Northern Illinois University College of Law, saw the writing on the wall. Two women alleged that he created a \"hostile work environment\" when they worked for the dean as temporary staff at the law school last summer. An investigation found he violated university policy ( university-board-meeting-0629-20170628-story.html), but did not confirm the hostile workplace claims. Before school trustees could act on the report, Dannenmaier resigned. He said he was \"highly shocked\" by the allegations, but chose to resign rather than distract the law school. Hostile Work Environment However it could have played out, the dean's abrupt resignation certainly spared the school a potentially embarrassing, drawn-out, and costly process. Dannenmaier had been dean for only a year, and was on leave since February when he first learned of the allegations will likely never understand how they could interpret any of my words or actions as creating a hostile work environment or what motivated the complaint months after the communications alleged,\" he wrote in his resignation letter. The law school investigation revealed no details, but Dannenmaier conceded that \"for some at the law school pushed too far too fast.\" He pointed out that there were no allegations of \"inappropriate touching\" or \"quid pro quo requests.\" If he didn't read the writing on the wall there, maybe Dannenmaier read about what happened to the former dean at Berkeley School of Law. Sex Harassment Sujit Choudhry resigned as dean at Berkeley last year after a former assistant sued him for sexual harassment. The university recently settled the case, agreeing to pay $1.7 million ( associates/berkeley-settles-sex-harassment-case-against-former-law-school- dean/) to the accuser and her attorneys. Tyann Sorrell alleged in her complaint that the dean hugged, kissed, and touched her repeatedly in 2014 and 2015 and that the university did nothing to stop it. Choudhry agreed to pay $100,000 in a separate agreement, but denied the allegations. He said the public backlash was most devastating became too frightened to leave my own home, an exiled pariah,\" he said watched helplessly as my reputation as an academic administrator, a scholar, a husband, a father and a friend crumbled in a matter of days.\" Dannenmaier's case is different than Choudhry's -- except that they were both deans at prominent law schools who resigned under pressure after being accused by women of improper workplace behavior. Related Resources: Law School Dean Dismissed Amid 'Hostile Work Environment' Accusations ( dismissed-amid-hostile-work-environment-accusations/) (Above the Law) Overcoming Age Bias Against Older Lawyers ( bias-against-older-lawyers/) (FindLaw's Greedy Associates) Women Lawyers and Alcohol Abuse: How Stress Is to Blame ( and-alcohol-abuse-how-stress-is-to-blame/) (FindLaw's Greedy Associates) Copyright \u00a9 2025, FindLaw. All rights reserved. Terms ( | Privacy ( | Disclaimer ( | Cookies (", "7467_103.pdf": "Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement Here's a rundown of legal academics who have recently been investigated or are currently under investigation for possible misconduct and violations of Title IV. December 05, 2018 at 10:48 7 minute read By Karen Sloan The original version of this story was published on Law.com 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 1/13 The legal academy is having its own #MeToo reckoning. The past year or so has seen a spate of law professors and administrators come under the microscope for their questionable conduct with students and staff. No doubt, law campuses have always had their share of creeps and line- crossers. Remember former Case Western law dean Lawrence Mitchell, who resigned in 2014 amid allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a student and sexually harassed others? Or Sujit Choudhry, who was ousted from his perch running the University of California, Berkeley School of Law after his assistant sued claiming sexual harassment? It's difficult to say whether the #MeToo movement is prompting more complaints of misconduct on law campuses, or whether misconduct investigations are simply garnering more attention now that the movement has placed a national spotlight on those who use positions of power and authority to take advantage of others. Regardless, here is a rundown of recent, publicly disclosed misconduct investigations centered on legal academics. Some have wrapped up with 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 2/13 sanctions doled out, while others remain open, including the recently launched investigation into Indiana University Maurer School of Law professor Ian Samuel. Eric Dannenmaier, Northern Illinois College of Law, February 2017. The sexual harassment case against former Northern Illinois Dean Eric Dannenmaier technically predates the #MeToo movement, though it wrapped up just a few months before the Harvey Weinstein revelation that brought it to the fore. Dannenmaier was dean of the school for just nine months before two employees filed sexual harassment allegations against him. The female employees, who had both quit by the time they complained to the university, said the dean had subjected them and students to graphic, sexual comments. The university launched a Title investigation and Dannenmaier did not categorically deny making the comments in question. Investigators noted that his story shifted over time while the complainants' remained consistent. University officials determined that there was enough credible evidence to conclude that the dean had created a hostile working environment for the complainants. He was placed on voluntary leave in February and resigned in June, a year after assuming the deanship. Dannenmaier could not be reached for comment. Jeffrey Standen, Northern Kentucky University Chase College of Law, November 2017. Former law dean Jeffrey Standen resigned last December after three women filed harassment complaints against him the previous month. The complainants\u2014one employee and two students \u2014claimed that the then-dean forced them to do demeaning things, such as standing on a table while wearing a dress to reach an air vent and picking up items from the floor while he watched them bend over. He also made repeated requests for hugs. 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 3/13 The university's monthlong investigation concluded that there was not enough evidence to support a finding of sexual misconduct, but that Standen had fostered a work environment rife with an \u201cunhealthy culture of fear, intimidation and bullying.\u201d Standen did not respond to a request for comment on the matter, but earlier he denied acting inappropriately with law school employees and students. Still, he voluntarily resigned the deanship. He remains on the law faculty. Jed Rubenfeld, Yale Law School, Spring 2018. Yale Law School reportedly launched a Title investigation into faculty superstar Jed Rubenfeld in the spring after numerous female students complained that his conduct with them crossed boundaries. Some said his behavior constituted sexual harassment, according to this Slate article that explored the sometimes blurry line between mentorship and misconduct law school spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment this week on the investigation and its status, though Dean Heather Gerken said in a public statement in September that the school is taking the matter seriously. (The school has not publicly confirmed the existence of an investigation.) The crux of the Rubenfeld matter seems to center on his role as an influential mentor with connections that help students land coveted clerkships, and whether he used that status to cross certain lines. Former students told Slate that Rubenfeld scheduled late-night one-on-one meetings with them; that he drank to excess with students; and made inappropriate, sexually tinged comments both individually and in class. Rubenfeld did not respond to a request for comment but previously said the allegations could stem from his controversial writing on legal topics. Todd Bruno, Charleston School of Law, July 2018. Todd Bruno was the director of legal research, analysis and writing at the Charleston School 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 4/13 of Law before resigning his position after numerous female students lodged complaints that he had groped them and made sexually inappropriate comments to them. According to a leaked copy of the report that resulted from the school's investigation, circulated by local news site FitsNews, the school had received seven complaints about Bruno in the previous six months, stemming from incidents between 2016 and 2018. Many of the complaints stemmed from Bruno's position as a moot court and trial advocacy team adviser, where he reportedly drank heavily during out-of-town competitions and groped several students. Multiple students reported that Bruno placed his head on their breasts while out at bars, according to the report. Bruno denied the allegations, but investigators concluded it was more likely than not that the claims against him were credible. The school reportedly reached a monetary settlement with the three complainants, but it declined to comment on Bruno other than to confirm that he is no longer on the faculty. Jay Kesan, University of Illinois College of Law, October 2018. Professor Jay Kesan's alleged misconduct took place before 2015, but the university did not complete its Title investigation until 2017. And the existence of that investigation didn't go public until October, when an affiliate obtained the resulting report through an open records request. The investigation stemmed from multiple complaints that Kesan had acted inappropriately with students and faculty. One student reported that Kesan had rubbed her thigh; another said he invited her to stay at his apartment; and a faculty member told investigators that he asked invasive questions about her sex life. The investigators concluded that his behavior violated the campus code of conduct but did not rise to the level of sexual misconduct. (He was required to undergo sexual harassment training.) But news of the investigation prompted a backlash among Illinois law students, with the 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 5/13 Ian Samuel Student Bar Association calling for his resignation. Law Dean Vik Amar said that the law school must follow established personnel procedures, and he encouraged students to reform how the university handles misconduct cases. Kesan is taking a one-year unpaid leave and did not respond to a request for comment. Ian Samuel, Indiana University Maurer School of Law- Bloomington, November 2018. Indiana University has launched a Title investigation into professor Ian Samuel, who is in his first semester teaching at the Bloomington law school. Details are scarce at this point about the allegations against Samuel, who is also the co-host of the Supreme Court podcast First Mondays, though university officials on Friday confirmed the existence of an investigation and law dean Austen Parrish told students that Samuel had voluntarily checked himself into a hospital. (Samuel did not respond to multiple requests for comment.) Title investigations typically center of claims of sexual harassment or misconduct, but not always. Samuel is a prominent name in the legal academy, having spurred the national law student movement against mandatory arbitration agreements at large law firm when he circulated a leaked copy of the clause Munger, Tolles & Olson used for summer associates. (The firm quickly ended mandatory arbitration for summer associates amid the backlash.) This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis\u00ae and Bloomberg Law. 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 6/13 To view this content, please continue to their sites. Go To Lexis \u2192 Not a Lexis Subscriber? Subscribe Now Go To Bloomberg Law \u2192 Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber? Subscribe Now Why am seeing this \u00a9 2025 Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing. You Might Like 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 7/13 February 21, 2025 Cozen O'Connor Brings on Father-Daughter Duo to Boost Real Estate Practice By Amanda O'Brien 4 minute read February 21, 2025 Reviving Leg Amputation Case, Superior Court Finds Trial Court Wrongfully Disregarded Expert Report By Riley Brennan 4 minute read 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 8/13 February 21, 2025 People in the News\u2014Feb. 21, 2025\u2014Barley Snyder, Sweet Stevens By Victoria Pfefferle-Gillot 3 minute read 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 9/13 February 20, 2025 Cost Containment Provision Doesn't Bar Recovery for Future Medical Expense, Pa. Fed. Judge Rules By Riley Brennan 5 minute read Judge Dissolves TRO, Denies Additional Relief in Employee Litigation 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 10/13 OpenSea Says Has Ceased Enforcement Action Into Exchange 3 Class Actions: Wave of Lawsuits Target RetailMeNot Supreme Court Temporarily Leaves in Place Order Reinstating Official Trump Fired Legal Experts Slam Trump's Justification for Ending New York's Congestion Pricing Latest Trending Who Got The Work J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco\u2026 Read More Who Got The Work Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel in a pending securities lawsuit The action filed on Dec Learn More About Radar 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 11/13 Am Law 200 Real Estate: Trends and Analysis The Analyst View: The Legal Market Trends to Navigate in 2025 Rising Costs Could Squeeze Margins, but Big Law on Pace to Outperform Expectations in 2024 More from Making Black History: Florida Bar President-Elect Rosalyn Sia Baker- Barnes Charters New Territory 1 minute read Davis Polk's Leor Landa on Wild Times in Fund Formation 1 minute read Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what\u2019s happening in the legal industry. Browse all Products 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 12/13 1 minute read Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer Don't miss the crucial news and insights you need to make informed legal decisions. Join Law.com now! Unlimited access to Law.com 1 free article* across the subscription network every 30 days Access to additional free publications Exclusive discounts on events and publications Already have an account? Sign In The industry-leading media platform offering competitive intelligence to prepare for today and anticipate opportunities for future success. About Us Contact Us Site Map Asset & Logo Licensing Advertise With Us Customer Service Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright \u00a9 2025 Global, All Rights Reserved Join The Legal Intelligencer 2/22/25, 8:47 Law Profs Swept Up in the #MeToo Movement 13/13", "7467_104.pdf": "Home / Daily News gives former law dean $95K for off-campus gives former law dean $95K for off-campus research (HTTPS://WWW.ABAJOURNAL.COM/AUTHORS/20 17, 2017, 1:26 Tweet Email Print In exchange for not getting sued, Northern Illinois University agreed to pay $95,000 to Eric Dannenmaier, its former law school dean, who recently resigned after a campus Title investigation that found it was more likely than not he sexually harassed employees. The resolution agreement ( df) (PDF) involves Dannenmaier taking an off-campus research assignment until Dec. 31, the Daily Chronicle ( pay-former-dean-almost-95-000-for-off-campus-role/ay7k6o6/) of Dekalb, Illinois, reports. In addition to forgoing a lawsuit, both parties agreed that they would not criticize each other publicly. Dannenmaier\u2019s scholarship focuses on environmental democracy, according to the website ( His research assignment involves restoring ecosystems and governmental efficiency. After being hired as NIU\u2019s law school dean in June 2016, Dannenmaier took a voluntary leave of absence in February 2017, the Chicago Tribune ( northern-illinois-university-board-meeting-0629-20170628-story.html? i10c.referrer=http%3A%2F%2F meeting-0629-20170628-story.html) reported. He resigned in June, and in a resignation letter ( (PDF) noted complaints alleging he created a \u201chostile work environment\u201d but asserted that there were no allegations of \u201cinappropriate touching\u201d or \u201cquid pro quo requests.\u201d Share Like 0 Share 2/22/25, 8:48 gives former law dean $95K for off-campus research 1/3 Dannenmaier\u2019s letter stated will likely never understand how they could interpret any of my words or actions as creating a hostile work environment or what motivated the complaint months after the communications alleged.\u201d According to NIU\u2019s Title investigation memo ( chronicle.com/lists/2017/07/12/5c1b6724aede43b1aba3205170f9ca9f/index.xml?page=2), which the Daily Chronicle posted July 15, Dannenmaier asked an employee if she had \u201cengaged in sexual experimentation with females,\u201d suggested that he was \u201cgood with [his] mouth\u201d in a sexual way and asked her how often she had sex. When the Title investigator asked Dannenmaier about the allegations, he reportedly said that he and the accuser \u201cengaged in a mutual and sociable friendship,\u201d the April 14 investigation memo states, and the informal discussions were \u201caccepted and welcomed.\u201d \u201cDannenmaier also assert[ed] that your personality as \u2018a strong young woman\u2019 would have caused you to say something to him and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of the occurrence,\u201d the memo states. Jennifer Murphy, Dannenmaier\u2019s lawyer, told the Daily Chronicle that the investigation lacked due process. The U.S. Department of Education\u2019s Office for Civil Rights, which oversees Title complaints, in a 2011 \u201cdear colleague\u201d letter ( 201104.pdf) (PDF) stated that schools must use a preponderance of evidence standard when making determinations about sexual harassment. \u201cNIU\u2019s June 2017 final decision regarding the allegations is the only complete review of the record in context, and the publication of any documents prepared prior to that would be especially misleading,\u201d Murphy wrote in an email to the newspaper. Dannenmaier did not respond to an Journal interview request. There was \u201cchaos\u201d in the law school admissions office when Dannenmaier arrived, he wrote in his resignation letter, and the campus had deferred maintenance issues and underutilized classroom and library space. His letter also noted a reduction in faculty because of recent retirements and budget constraints. \u201cIn the early months of my tenure, we reversed these negative trends despite the budget cuts. The College of Law welcomed a new class in fall 2016 that was 23 percent larger than the prior year, its largest in over five years, with scores that held steady at the median and advanced modestly in the top quartile,\u201d he wrote. \u201cThe last admissions report that saw showed an increased in applications so far this season, and projected another solid admissions year with potential for an increased in median.\u201d The law school\u2019s 509 report ( (PDF) for 2016 reports that it had a total of 252 students, and its 75th percentile score was 151. Its 2015 509 report ( (PDF) showed a total of 277 2/22/25, 8:48 gives former law dean $95K for off-campus research 2/3 Copyright 2025 American Bar Association. All rights reserved. students, and its 75th percentile score was 150. Dannenmaier\u2019s resignation letter claims that during his tenure as dean he hired three new faculty members, increased donations of unrestricted funds and led a project to move one of the school\u2019s legal clinics to more modern space. He also mentioned a plan to reduce alcohol consumption at student social gatherings, which some students reportedly did not like know that for some at the law school pushed too far too fast am aware of concerns expressed about how managed these many changes within the first months of my arrival; claims that moved \u2018too quickly,\u2019 was \u2018too informal,\u2019 gave \u2018too much attention to admissions,\u2019 didn\u2019t follow \u2018established hierarchies\u2019 and was \u2018too inclined to speak my mind,\u2019 \u201d reads the letter, which doesn\u2019t attribute the quoted language to a specific person or organization took steps to slow the pace, consult faculty and students more methodically and keep my door open to ideas and concerns from every quarter had believed that we were making progress,\u201d Dannenmaier wrote. Northern Illinois University disagrees with many of Dannenmaier\u2019s characterizations of the law school, a spokesperson told the Journal. \u201cAlthough constrained in our ability to respond to specific statements, the faculty and staff of the College of Law want to emphasize they are very proud of the continued success of our graduates on the bar exam and in securing legal employment,\u201d the spokesperson wrote in an email. Prior to coming to as dean, Dannenmaier was a professor at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, where he directed its Environmental, Energy and Natural Resources Law Program Boston University School of Law graduate who also has an from Columbia University and a master of studies from Oxford University, Dannenmaier also served as director of Tulane Law School\u2019s Institute for Environmental Law and Policy. And from 1996 to 2000, he served as director of the U.S. Agency for International Development\u2019s environmental law program. Mark W. Cordes, who teaches, property, constitutional and environmental law classes at NIU, is the law school\u2019s interim dean, according to its website ( Updated at 2:38 p.m. to clarify that Dannenmaier resigned. Updated at 8:39 p.m. to add PDFs of Dannenmaier\u2019s resignation agreement and letter. Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error. 2/22/25, 8:48 gives former law dean $95K for off-campus research 3/3", "7467_105.pdf": "Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave University of Illinois College of Law Dean Vikram Amar has told students that professor Jay Kesan won't teach this semester as planned. January 07, 2020 at 01:50 3 minute read By Karen Sloan University of Illinois College of Law. (Courtesy photo.) 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 1/12 University of Illinois law professor who was found in 2017 to have acted inappropriately with female students for years won't be returning to the classroom this semester as expected. Embattled law professor Jay Kesan, who just concluded a year-long unpaid leave of absence, will not teach cybersecurity law and policy and intellectual property transactions during the spring semester as scheduled, according to Illinois law Dean Vikram Amar, who informed students by email in late December. Instead, Amar wrote that Kesan is on a \"university sanctioned leave\" and that other faculty will teach those two courses. The decision was first reported by The News-Gazette in Champaign, Illinois. Reached Tuesday, associate chancellor Robin Neal Kaler called Kesan's leave \"indefinite\" but declined to comment further. It's unclear whether that leave was Kesan's decision or imposed by the university. Amar on Tuesday referred requests for clarification to Kaler, and Kesan did not respond to requests for comment. The university in 2015 launched an investigation into Kesan's conduct after three women lodged complaints against him. That investigation concluded in 2017 that the law professor had acted inappropriately with female students\u2014for example, rubbing a female student's thigh, inviting another to stay at his Chicago apartment, and asking invasive questions about a student's sex life\u2014but that his actions were not extreme enough to violate the campus' sexual misconduct rules. He was required to undergo sexual harassment training. The investigator's report stayed under wraps until 2018, when Northern Illinois affiliate obtained it through an open records request. The response from students was swift. The law school's Student Bar Association called on Kesan to resign, writing in a letter that they were, \"shocked, angered, and disappointed not only by Professor Kesan's 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 2/12 Jay Kesan. horrible behavior but also by the muted response of the university administration.\" Ultimately, Kesan took a year of unpaid leave starting in January 2019, which concluded this month. He has been on the faculty of the law school since 1998 and remains listed as a faculty member on the law school's website. Kesan is one of a number of legal academics who were found to have crossed the line with students or staff in recent years. Former University of California, Berkeley School of Law Dean Sujit Choudhry resigned in 2016 after he was sued for sexual harassment by his executive assistant. Up-and-coming legal academic Ian Samuel in May resigned his associate professor post at Indiana University Maurer School of Law\u2014Bloomington, after the university launched a Title misconduct investigation the previous December. In an open letter to university provost Lauren Robel, Samuel wrote that he had taken to drinking in excess and \"treating the people present in ways they didn't deserve.\" Marquette University removed law professor Paul Secunda from the classroom in December 2018 amid allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a student university spokesman said Tuesday that Secunda \"is not currently assigned to teaching duties.\" And two law deans resigned in 2017 after women filed sexual harassment claims against them. Eric Dannenmaier left the deanship of Northern Illinois University College of Law in June of that year, while former Northern Kentucky University Chase College of Law Dean Jeffrey Standen resigned that post in December. This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis\u00ae and Bloomberg Law. 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 3/12 To view this content, please continue to their sites. Go To Lexis \u2192 Not a Lexis Subscriber? Subscribe Now Go To Bloomberg Law \u2192 Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber? Subscribe Now Why am seeing this \u00a9 2025 Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing. You Might Like 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 4/12 February 20, 2025 Despite Breakneck Changes to On Campus, Counsel for Schools Shouldn't Feel Rushed, Lawyers Advise By Colleen Murphy 5 minute read February 14, 2025 Federal Court Evaluates Constitutionality of School's Transgender Policy Prohibiting Parental Notice By Colleen Murphy 5 minute read 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 5/12 February 14, 2025 Men Push Back, Students Sue: The Culture War on Campus By Briana Warsing 7 minute read 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 6/12 February 13, 2025 Mass Shooting Survivor Hits Michigan State University With $50M Civil Rights Lawsuit By Colleen Murphy 4 minute read Judge Dissolves TRO, Denies Additional Relief in Employee Litigation 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 7/12 OpenSea Says Has Ceased Enforcement Action Into Exchange 3 Class Actions: Wave of Lawsuits Target RetailMeNot Supreme Court Temporarily Leaves in Place Order Reinstating Official Trump Fired Legal Experts Slam Trump's Justification for Ending New York's Congestion Pricing Latest Trending Who Got The Work J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco\u2026 Read More Who Got The Work Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel in a pending securities lawsuit The action filed on Dec Learn More About Radar 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 8/12 Am Law 200 Real Estate: Trends and Analysis The Analyst View: The Legal Market Trends to Navigate in 2025 Rising Costs Could Squeeze Margins, but Big Law on Pace to Outperform Expectations in 2024 More from Making Black History: Florida Bar President-Elect Rosalyn Sia Baker- Barnes Charters New Territory 1 minute read Davis Polk's Leor Landa on Wild Times in Fund Formation 1 minute read Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what\u2019s happening in the legal industry. Browse all Products 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 9/12 1 minute read Resources Infographic: Six Trends That Will Drive Firm Real Estate in 2025 Brought to you by Download Now An eDiscovery Blueprint for the Construction Industry Brought to you by HaystackID Download Now 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 10/12 2025 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report Brought to you by Download Now The Power of Online Reputation Management For Attorneys Critical Tool For Law Firms in 2025 Brought to you by Erase.com Download Now Browse More Resources 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 11/12 Subscribe to Law.com Don't miss the crucial news and insights you need to make informed legal decisions. Join Law.com now! Unlimited access to Law.com 1 free article* across the subscription network every 30 days Access to additional free publications Exclusive discounts on events and publications Already have an account? Sign In The industry-leading media platform offering competitive intelligence to prepare for today and anticipate opportunities for future success. About Us Contact Us Site Map Asset & Logo Licensing Advertise With Us Customer Service Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright \u00a9 2025 Global, All Rights Reserved Join Law.com 2/22/25, 8:48 Law Prof Who Crossed Lines With Female Students Now on 'Indefinite' Leave 12/12", "7467_106.pdf": "To: Eric Dannenmeir Dean College of law From: Dr. Anne Vice Presid Outreach, lopment Date: June 9, 2017 RE: Appeal of Finding of Sexual Harassment, dated April14, 2017 The following are the results of the appeal to me in the above referenced matter: Northern Illinois University Division o{' Outreach, Engagement, and Regional Development Office or the Vice President Lowden Hall 307 DeKalb, lllinois 60115\u00b72828 815-753-9503 Fax 815-753-0666 [email protected] On April28, 2017, Appellant Dean Eric Dannenmeir appealed the April14, 2017 finding of sexual harassment for the Title Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassment that was filed against him, dated February 15, 2017. The April14, 2017 Official Report of Findings stated that \"After careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that [Dean] Dannenmeir sexually harassed [the Complainants] by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace.\" After careful review of the materials submitted to me during this appeal concur with the findings of the investigator. During the course of the appeal, Dean Dannenmeir was provided the opportunity to supplement his appeal with any additional information he believed needed to be reviewed and considered. This led to a small postponement of the timeline in processing this appeal. Dean Dannenmeir realizes in retrospect that his collaborative approach to the work of the led to \"uncertain professional barriers\" and relationships with the Complainants \"which became too familiar.\" He \"viewed [the Complainants] as colleagues and friends, and not as subordinates.\" This approach to the dean's supervisory role appears throughout his interviews and indicates a lack of understanding of both the responsibilities of a senior executive and the potential conflict between the natural desire to maintain office friendships and the necessary exercise of executive responsibility in a way that treats (and is perceived to be treating) all players fairly and equally. Dean Dannenmeir asserts that \"the hundreds of text messages\" he provided the investigators were \"not reviewed or considered find that the text messages were indeed reviewed but were deemed by the investigator to be \"friendly banter\" which the Complainants believed to be necessary to \"get work done.\" The Complainants' communications are described by the investigator (accurately, in my opinion) as \"not sexually explicit or charged.\" The investigator also concluded that the Complainants' responses to their supervisor's comments were not indicative of approval of the behavior which prompted them. It should be noted that those responses were also not indicative of disapproval. For the most part, a Learning Today, Leading Tomorrow Northern Illinois University scm Equal Opporlunily/Affinnativc Attlon lnstillltion. review of the record indicates that the Complainants' expressions of discomfort with the Dean's communications occurred in retrospect and only after they decided to file a grievance and Most of the conversations described in the findings are recollected similarly from a content perspective by both the Complainants and by Dean Dannenmeir. The interpretation of those conversations differs significantly. It is difficult to choose sides here without having heard the conversations or watched the part ies' interactions, but it seems clear from the Dean's reported comments throughout the period of the investigation that he was far too informal in his communication with colleagues and particularly with subordinates, and that he undermined his authority by his desire to minimize professional barriers and be seen as a friend. We can agree that some of the conversations between the Dean and the Complainants were sexual in nat ure, but we cannot agree on all of them since Dean Dannenmeir's interpretation and the Complainants' interpretation vary greatly. Judgments regarding whether these comments/ incidents were severe and pervasive require an additional judgement regarding whose interpretation of the comments should prevail and whether there was any indication, prior to the Complainants' , that the comments affected or would affect the Complainants' employment and wellbeing. The significant power differential between the dean and the Complainants, the Complainants' desire to prove themselves to be up to the tasks assigned them, their probable need for references in the future, and their fear of repercussions are all viewed by the investigator as contributing to and justifying the absence (except on two early occasions) of explicit expressions of concern or protests on the part of the Complainants about the nature of the dean's conversations and conduct. That the concerns expressed by the Complainants on those two documented occasions did put an end to a conversation which made the protesting Complainant uncomfortable might also suggest that the Complainants could in fact influence the nature and content of their conversations with the Dean when they chose to do so. That t he University's Tit le Policy, Procedures and associated training opportunities have not convinced potential victims of hostile work environments that they can and should express their discomfort early and often is a lesson to be learned from this investigation and one which should be emphasized in future training sessions. The issue here is not whether Dean Dannenmeir's comments were sexual, overly intrusive and inappropriate - many were - but whether he knew or had reason to know that they were unwelcome. The Complainants, at least in retrospect, claim to have been made uncomfortable by Dean Dannenmeir's communication style and his attempts to be more of a friend than a supervisor. Their decision does suggest that their discomfort was real. Dean Dannenmeir, on the other hand, believes he had no reason to suspect that discomfort, and he can point to texts and emails expressing the Complainants' enthusiasm for the work of the office, their admiration for his leadership, and their pleasure in being part of the team. It is possible that both perspectives are accurate, and that both the Dean and the Complainants behaved in ways which made them vulnerable to the results which transpired. That said, it is the Dean who is he senior party in this situation, and the Dean who represents or should represent the values of the University. On that basis, and in spite of my belief that the Complainants had no reason to doubt their ability to assert their views or pursue their professional goals while working with Dean Dannenmeir have to concur with the findings of the investigation. Cc: lisa Freeman, Executive Vice President & Provost Title Office, c/o Laura Alexander Sent via Electronic Mail Attachment To: Eric Dannenmaier, Dean College of Law From: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance mjohnsonl @niu.edu Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University Affirmative Action and !:quit)' Compliance Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Lowden Hall 101 OcKrub, Illinois 60115-2020 815-753-1118 FaxBlS-7!;3-1001 [email protected] Re: Oj]icial Report of Findings for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Report of Gender Discriminatio11, dated February 17,2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\"} that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for a report of gender discrimination in the Constitutional Law class that arose during the course of the investigation involving comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issue that formed the basis of this investigation was as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that you engaged in gender discrimination during Constitutional Law class by treating female students differently than their male counterparts After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that you treated female students differently than their similarly situated male counterparts on the basis of gender during Constitutional Law Gender discrimination is defined as differences in academic decisions that are based upon the sex/gender of the student and/or involve a comparison of one gender to another that results in differential treatment. As evidence of gender discrimination, the rep01t that we received alleged that you only \"cold called\" female students and, as a result, male students did not feel the need to prepare for class and/or were not subjected to the \"cold call\" pressure. In short, the allegation suggests male students were treated more favorably in this regard because they were not required to be as prepared as their female counterparts. This report also alleged that the different treatment appeared to be on the basis of gender. Lastly, the report alleged that you stated during class, \"Ladies, sometimes size matters\" which was interpreted as being inclusive of sexual connotations as in reference to the size of a male penis (while that specific terminology was not used and/or alleged). Nmthctn llllnul~ Unlve:n;fl) I~ hn ((IU<I) Ql)pnrtunlty/Afllntmlhc Atthm IMrUution As a result of the investigation, there was not enough information to conclude that you treated students differently on the basis of gender in the Constitutional Law class. While you admitted to stating \"size matters\" you denied such involved sexual connotation, but rather was related to the size of a vehicle truck. You also denied using the term \"ladies\" to preface the comment. You suggested that there had only been four (4) classes at the time of the complaint and thus, you did not have enough time to call on all students (which occurred via the use of a seating chart). Based upon the investigation, including a review of the report and lack of witness testimony to corroborate otherwise, there was not enough information to conclude your comment \"size matters' and/or the \"cold calling\" of female students only, was indicative of discrimination on the basis of gender. Based upon the evidence presented during the course of the Investigation, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that you treated female students differently than their similarly situated male counterparts on the basis of gender in your classroom. This matter is considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President of Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten ( 1 0) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please also be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that sex discrimination has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be sex discrimination in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning sex cliscrimination. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defmed above, please contact Mfirmative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-6042 or .miQbnsonl @niu~~4u. cc: Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Affirmative Action File Sent Via E-mail AtUlchment To: From: c Sarah Adamski, Associate Director oflnvc Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance !?~\u00aemslcil@nilt_,_~u Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University Affirmative At:lion and Equity Compliance Affinnativl.' Action and Equity Compllance SWe.n Parson Hallll 0 DeKalb,lllluols 60115-2628 815-753-1118 Fax815-753-100l [email protected] Re: Official Report of Findings for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassment that you filed against Eric Dannenmaier, dated February 15, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the Affirmative Action Complaint of sexual harassment that you flied against Eric Dannenmaier, Dean, College of Law (\"Dannenmaier\"), dated February 15,2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issue that formed the basis of this investigation is as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed you by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed you by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace On February 15,2017, you filed a Complaint of sexual harassment against Dannerunaier. The Complaint alleged that Dannerunaier engaged in comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. In order for the comments and language to constitute a form of sexual harassment, the comments and/or conduct must be (1) unwelcomed, (2) conduct of a sexual nature, that is (3) severe and/or pervasive enough to have the purpose or effect of interfering with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work envirorunent. The reasonable person standard is the test used to determine whether or not a reasonable person in the same and/or similar circumstances would find the comments and/or conduct to be of a sexual nature and severe and/or pervasive enough to interfere with work performance and/or to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. On February 22, 2017 and March 9, 2017, Dannerunaier was provided an opportunity to respond to these allegations during an interview with myself, Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, and Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator. On February 15; 2017 and March 10, 2017, you were also interviewed related to the allegations contained with your Complaint. After all interviews, parties were provided a copy of the summary of the interview, which allowed for verification the summary for Nu\u2022 thc:rn lllin\u2022~i~ Univet:\\1t)' is an Equal OI>PMfUnir)\u2022/AHirmall\\'c .-\\Cfl(Jn ln$tirutian completeness and accuracy. All parties added information into these documents to ensure such. You and Dannenmaier also provided additional information on April 11, 2017, in response to an email that was sent on April 7, 2017, requesting specific information. After Dannenmaier's first interview, he also provided documentation of various conversations with you and a cover memorandum, which provided more information about the allegations. All pieces of documentary evidence were incorporated into the Investigation. Witness testimony from students, faculty and staff were also obtained during the Investigation. Similarly, all interviewees were provided a summary of their interview, which they also verified for completeness and accuracy. All verified summaries were incorporated into this Investigation. Pursuant to a thorough investigation, which included your allegations, Dannenmaier's responses, a review of documentary evidence provided by both parties and witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier subjected you to sexual harassment while you were employed as a Strategic Initiatives Associate within the College of Law. Each element necessary to support a claim of sexual harassment will be discussed separately below. (1) Conduct of a Sexual Nature As a result of a careful and thorough review of the above information presented during my interview with you, Dannenmaier, witnesses and presented documentation (as described above), there was enough information to conclude that it is more probable than not that Dannenmaier made comments to you that were sexual in nature. Specifically, Dannenmaier's testimony included his failure to deny or recall the following: \u2022 ; \u2022 Discussion pertaining to his \u2022 Asking you, ''Is it just sex or are you in love, because if its love you shouldn't have to be apart\" in regards to ; \u2022 Teasingly asking you if you \"could have slept with someone else\" or saying \"she could do better;\" \u2022 On a car ride to with you alone, discussing your relationship with , asking you who else you have had sex with and a dating \u2022 During a one-on-one trip to , eating dinner alone with you and ordering drinks for you which was independent of conference activities; \u2022 Invited you to his home to meet individuals in environmental law; \u2022 Saying \"You know, you and me, we'll fmd some project down the line\" or \"words to that effect,\" causing you to infer \"you and me, down the line\" to mean having a relationship with you; \u2022 Repeatedly offering you a ride home after work; \u2022 Repeatedly inviting you to his home mid-day to let his dogs out with him; \u2022 Informing you that if your plans were to stay in the local area , then national and international connections would be less valuable; and \u2022 Told you \"clearly you are training again\" wherein you inferred this to be in reference to your body. The statements above illustrate Dannenmaier's admissions and those that he was not able to categorically \"deny\" as indicated by his repeated response that he \"did not recall\" making the alleged statements. Additionally, there was also enough information gathered during the investigation to conclude that Dannenmaier has made similar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff, thereby further corroborating your version of the events. These remarks, conduct and/or connotations included, but were not limited to, comments of a sexual nature Dannenmaier made during his Constitutional Law class ( and comments regarding a Nutl h~m lll inol ~ Unh c ~hy is ~\u00b7n Opp ortunit}'/Anlnml lh~ . .).cliun lnslilution colleague's appearance during faculty meetings . Numerous witnesses also testified that Dannerunaier commented about \"dating\" a female candidate for hire and hugged a female professor without her approval and! or request. Moreover, witnesses testified that Dannenmaier referred to a \" buddy.\" Dannenmaier denies making this statement, yet witness testimony concludes otherwise. Moreover, during the Investigation, Dannenmaier provided information that contradicted earlier testimony on several occasions. For example, initially, in regards to a different allegation contained within another Investigation, Dannenmaier suggested that a dinner on August 19, 2016 with at his home involved general conversation only and did not involve sex. However, later, during the investigation, Dannenmaier stated that the conversation included a \"number of topics, including sex.\" Despite my clear request to explain whether or not Dannerunaier engaged in conversations of a sexual nature on the day in question, he initially denied such conversations occurred and only later admitted that he engaged in sexual conversations with The allegations presented with Complaint are also similar in nature to those presented in yours. You, on the other hand, provided consistent testimony during the course of the Investigation. Your testimony was consistent with the testimonies provided by faculty, staff and students and there is no cause to believe that such testimonies were altered and/or scripted to provide for corroboration as these witnesses were largely unaware of the existence of your Complaint and allegations contained therein. Without prompting or disclosing details of the Complaint, faculty and staff voluntarily provided information about Dannenmaier's interactions with you, which corroborated your testimony. Your testimony as deemed credible, coupled with Dannenmaier's inconsistent/incomplete testimony, lack of clear denial, admission that he engaged in conduct of a sexual nature as well as corroborating witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier engaged in conduct of a sexual nature with you during the tenure of your employment. (2) Unwelcomed You assert that despite your protest to Dannenmaier's questioning on or about September 1, 2016, while in the car to Rockford, the acquiescence and lack of objection was the result of your desire to avoid conflict due to the supervisory relationship and power differential between Dannerunaier, as Dean of the College of Law, and you, his subordinate . In contrast, Dannenmajer asserts that you engaged in a mutual and sociable friendship with him that indicated informality and banter was accepted and welcomed. This was evidenced in the numerous pages of text messages between you and Dannenmaier, indicating a mutual and friendly relationship. Dannenmaier also asserts that the Admissions Office operated in a \"collaborative and participatory style\" and he made it clear that he wanted you to work \"with\" him, not \"for\" him. Dannenmaier also asserts that your personality as a \"strong \" would have caused you to say something to him and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of their occurrence. Dannenmaier also questions whether the Complaint was filed in good faith After consideration of the testimonies, the evidence renders it more likely than not that Dannemnaier's conduct was unwelcomed by you. First, the fact that your outright protest to sexual comrrientary only occurred on one (1) occasion, an occurrence which he denies, does not bar a determination of unwelcomeness. This lack of protest may be the result of a fear of repercussion, which is reasonable to conclude in the matter at hand due to the supervisory relationship and power differential that existed between you and Dannenmaier, which reasonably caused you to be compliant and acquiesce to his behavior. Nurthcrn lllinui~ Unh Ct'\\il)' is an Equul Opportunil)'/~t'flnMih c Artlun lnsclrufloo , were offered and ultimately accepted the position with Dannenmaier, Dean of the College of Law, due to your As illustrated, you relied on Dannenmaier to gain experience and knowledge . Moreover, the close working space between you and Dannenmaier ( ) and his significant position of authority and power over you reasonably concludes that you did not feel comfortable protesting against the sexual comments for fear of retribution from him directly, the potential risk of jeopardizing your ability to be successful in the position and increased speculation by the faculty of your performance. Additionally, you felt isolated from faculty and staff based upon his comments of you being his \"ally;\" telling you that the faculty, especially the female faculty, did not trust you that he is \"always\" defending you to faculty and staff; and requesting you to send emails through him, despite his assertion that such was to receive a more prompt response. It is reasonable that this isolation caused you to acquiesce to Dannenmaier's conduct to complete day-to-day tasks for gainful employment and . Lastly, it is reasonable to conclude that your reliance upon Dannenmaier, as Dean of the College of Law and Additionally, as stated by you, informal and friendly communications with Dannenrnaier was a way to get work done and had been established by him very early in the working relationship. , it is reasonable to conclude that you would not protest against this relationship and would believe that, as Dean of the College of Law, he would be experienced with the set of formal, ethical, and lawful workplace boundaries that should be established. The informal workplace environment often resulted in after-hours work and late night phone calls that were friendly and mutual between you and Dannenmaier. Especially given the amount of time that you and Dannenmaier spent with one another, a level of informality was established and occurred, to no objection by you. Therefore, it is reasonable that you engaged in friendly banter with him, despite your unwelcomeness to his sexual commentary and language. However, welcomeness to friendly conduct does not equate to welcomeness to sexual conduct. You did not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking him reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature. You did not initiate sexually explicit or charged commentary or language with Dannenmaier that would have indicated that such type of behavior was welcomed. Moreover, Dannenmaier continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after he was explicitly informed by you, , on September 1, 2016 that the conduct that was sexual in nature made you feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures. (3) Severe and Pervasive Enough to Create a Hostile Work Environment Lastly, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenrnaier's unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for you. During your tenure, it became clear You questioned Dannenmaier about the work you were performing and reaffirmed your initial desire to . You declined, despite that being your main area of focus and the reason why you initially accepted the position. Ntlrthcrn lllinuis Unhel'~it \\' is ttn E<IUtll Opportonlty/-\\HirnmtiH: Aclion lnstllullnn You also moved her physical office location to to be closer to You and would interrupt meetings that each other were in with Dannenmaier to ensure they do not run long or past 4:30p.m., which is close ofbusiness. You stopped and uncomfortable. According to a staff member, you would attempt to avoid one-on-one extraneous interactions with Dannenmaier and . You have avoided social gatherings and extraneous events with him. Dannenmaier's conduct . This is also an objectively reasonable response to the environment that you were in, especially due to the relationship between Dannenmaier and you ( ) and position of power that he held as the Dean of the College of Law, . Pursuant to this Investigation, there is enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier has violated the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures prohibiting sexual harassment. Recommendations that address this specific conclusion have been referred to the appropriate Department head for review and consideration. This matter is now considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by either party by submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President of Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten (10) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that discrimination or harassment has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be discrimination or harassment in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning discrimination or harassment. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Atfmnative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-5560 or [email protected]. cc: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Affirmative Action File Sent Via E-mail Attachment To: Eric Dannenmaier, Dean College of Law From: Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance ~;adams_kjl@_Qiu,~Q!cl Date: April14, 2017 .ml Iii Northern Illinois University A(finnarive Action and Equil}' Compliance Afflnnattve Action and Equity Compliance Swen Parson HallllO DeKalb. Illinois 60 115-2828 815-753-1118 Fax 815-753-1001 [email protected] Re: Official Report of Findings for the Affirmative Actio ltJvestlgatiotJ of the Complai11t of Sexual Harassment that filed agaitJstyou, dated February 15, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the Affirmative Action Complaint of sexual harassment that filed against you, dated February 15, 2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issue that formed the basis of this investigation is as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that you sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that you sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace On February 15, 2017, flied a Complaint of sexual harassment against you. The Complaint alleged that you engaged in comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. In order for the comments and language to constitute a form of sexual harassment, the comments and/or conduct must be ( 1) unwelcomed, (2) conduct of a sexual nature, that is (3) severe and/or pervasive enough to have the purpose or effect of interfering with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. The reasonable person standard is the test used to determine whether or not a reasonable person in the same and/or similar circumstances would find the comments and/or conduct to be of a sexual nature and severe and/or pervasive enough to interfere with work performance and/or to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. On February 22, 2017 and March 9, 2017, you were provided an opportunity to respond to these allegations during an interview with myself, Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, and Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator. After both interviews, you were provided a copy of the summary of the interview, which allowed for you to verify the summary for completeness and accuracy. You added information into these documents to ensure such. You also provided additional information on April 11, 2017, in response to an email that was sent to you on April 7, 2017, requesting specific information. After your first interview, you also provided documentation of various conversations with and a cover memorandum, which provided more information about the allegations. All pieces of documentary evidence were incorporated into the Investigation. Witness testimony from students, faculty and staff were also obtained during the Investigation. Similarly, all interviewees were provided a summary of their interview, which they also verified for completeness and accuracy. All verified summaries were incorporated into this Investigation. Pursuant to a thorough investigation, which included your responses, a review of documentary evidence provided by both parties and witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that you subjected to sexual harassment while she was employed within the College of Law. Each element necessary to support a claim of sexual harassment will be discussed separately below. (1) Conduct of a Sexual Nature As a result of a careful and thorough review of the above information presented during my interview with you, witnesses and presented documentation (as described above), there was enough information to conclude that it is more probable than not that you made comments to that were sexual in nature. Specifically, your testimony included your failure to deny or recall the following: \u2022 \"clearly made the wrong choice\" in reference to this dating her and not \u2022 Discussion pertaining to your relationship \u2022 Asking \"Is it just sex or are you in love, because if its love you shouldn't have to be apart\" in regards to ; \u2022 Teasingly asking \"if she could have slept with someone else\" or saying \"she could do better;\" \u2022 On a car ride to with alone, discussing her relationship with , asking who else she has had sex with and a dating \u2022 During a one-on-one eating dinner alone with and ordering drinks for her which was independent of conference activities; \u2022 Invited to your home in to meet individuals \u2022 Saying \"You know, you and me, we'll find some project down the line\" or \"words to that effect,\" causing to infer \"you and me, down the line\" to mean having a relationship with her; \u2022 Repeatedly offering a ride home after work; \u2022 Inviting to your home mid-day to let your dogs out with you; \u2022 Informing that if her plans were to stay in the local area , then national and international connections would be less valuable; and \u2022 Told \"clearly you are training again\" wherein inferred this to be in reference to her body. The statements above illustrate your admissions and those that you were not able to categorically \"deny\" as indicated by your repeated response that \"you did not recall\" making the alleged statements. Additionally, there was also enough information gathered during the investigation to conclude that you have made similar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff, thereby further corroborating version of the events. These remarks, conduct and/or connotations included, but were not limited to, comments of a sexual nature you made during your Constitutional Law class comments regarding appearance Nmrhcrn lll lnui~ Unh-ctsit)' i~ un E<tu\"l Opporrunil)'/.\\rrirrn.ali\\'1.' \u00b7\\cttun lnsthution during faculty meetings (\" ). Numerous witnesses also testified that you commented about \"dating\" a female candidate for hire and hugged a female professor without her approval and/or request. Moreover, witnesses testified that you referred to as a buddy.\" You deny making this statement, yet witness testimony concludes otherwise. Moreover, during the Investigation, you provided information that contradicted earlier testimony on several occasions. For example, initially, in regards to a different allegation contained within another Investigation, you suggested that the dinner on August 19, 2016 with , at your home involved general conversation only and did not involve sex. However, later, during the investigation, you stated that the conversation included a \"number of topics, including sex.\" Despite my clear request to explain whether or not you engaged in conversations of a sexual nature on the day in question, you initially denied such conversations occurred and only later admitted that you engaged in sexual conversations with The allegations presented with Complaint are also similar in nature to those presented in on the other hand, provided consistent testimony during the course of the Investigation. Her testimony was consistent with the testimonies provided by faculty, staff and students and there is no cause to believe that such testimonies were altered and/or scripted to provide for corroboration as these witnesses were largely unaware of the existence of Complaint and allegations contained therein. Without prompting or disclosing details of the Complaint, faculty and staff voluntarily provided information about your interactions with which corroborated her testimony. testimony as deemed credible, coupled with your inconsistent/incomplete testimony, lack of clear denial, admission that you engaged in conduct of a sexual nature as well as corroborating witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that you engaged in conduct of a sexual nature with during the tenure of her employment. (2) Unwelcomed asserts that despite her protest to your questioning on or about September l, 2016, while in the car to , the acquiescence and lack of objection was the result of her desire to avoid conflict due to the supervisory relationship and power differential between you, as Dean of the College of Law, and her, your subordinate and . In contrast, you assert that engaged in a mutual and sociable friendship with you that indicated informality and banter was accepted and welcomed. This was evidenced in the numerous pages of text messages between you and indicating a mutual and friendly relationship. You also assert that the Admissions Office operated in a \"collaborative and participatory style\" and you made it clear that you wanted to work \"with\" you, not \"for\" you. You also asserted that personality as a \"strong \" would have caused her to say something to you and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of their occurrence. You also question whether the Complaint was filed in good faith as may have felt After consideration of the testimonies, the evidence renders it more likely than not that your conduct was unwelcomed by First, the fact that outright protest only occurred on one (1) occasion, an occurrence which you deny, does not bar a determination of unwelcomeness. This lack of protest may be the result of a fear of repercussion, which is reasonable to conclude in the matter at hand due to the supervisory relationship and power differential that existed between you and which caused her to be compliant and acquiesce to your behavior. Nunhern ll linui~ Uni\\'tiSit)' Is \u2022m Equal 0 J>Portunll)'/.,),flirmath\\' \u2022\\(tivn Institution Moreover, the close working space between you and and your significant position of authority and power over her reasonably concludes that did not feel comfortable protesting against the sexual comments for fear of retribution from you directly, the potential risk of jeopardizing her ability to be successful in the position and increased speculation by the faculty of her performance. Additionally, felt isolated from faculty and staff based upon your comments of her being your \"ally;\" telling her that the faculty, especially the female faculty, did not trust her or her ability to do the job; and that you are \"always\" defending them to faculty and staff. It is reasonable that this isolation caused to acquiesce to your conduct to complete day- to-day tasks for gainful employment and help build her environmental law contacts. Lastly it is reasonable to conclude that reliance upon you, as Dean of the College of Law and expert in the field of environmental law, for a favorable reference for future employment and assistance in obtaining the next step in her career, could reasonably serve as a reason for why she was not comfortable protesting against your conduct of a sexual nature at that time. Additionally, as stated by informal and friendly communications with you was a way to get work done and had been established by you very early in the working relationship. it is reasonable to conclude that would not protest against this relationship and would believe that, as Dean of the College of Law, you would be experienced with the set of formal, ethical, and lawful workplace boundaries that should be established. The informal workplace environment often resulted in after-hours work and late night phone calls that were friendly and mutual between you and Especially given the amount of time that you and spent with one another, a level of informality was established and occurred, to no objection by Therefore, it is reasonable that engaged in friendly banter with you, despite her unwelcomeness to your sexual commentary and language. However, welcomeness to friendly conduct does not equate to welcomeness to sexual conduct. did not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking you reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature. did not initiate sexually explicit or charged commentary or language with you that would have indicated that such type of behavior was welcomed. Moreover, you continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after you were explicitly informed by your subordinate, on September 1, 2016 that the conduct that was sexual in nature made her feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures. (3) Severe and Pervasive Enough to Create a Hostile Work Environment Lastly, there was enough information to conclude that your unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for During tenure, it became clear that questioned you about the work she was performing and reaffinned her initial desire You offered for her to come in during nights and weekends to work on environmental projects. declined, despite that being her main area of focus and the reason why she initially accepted the position. As a result, lost the ability to learn from you about 1 NurlhCm Illinois Univc~t }' i~ \u2022\u2022n ECIUill Opportunltr/.\\flirm.lli\\'c .Actlun Jnstirution because of her level of discomfort and not wanting to be with you during nights and weekends, even though she worked such hours when she was initially hired. She and would interrupt meetings that each other were in with you to ensure they do not run long or past 4:30p.m., which is close of business. stopped wearing pencil skirts to work and felt \"creeped out\" and uncomfortable. According to a staff member, would attempt to avoid one-on-one extraneous interactions with you and would not make her presence openly known when she would go to your suite for hot water, which was the only suite with hot water. has avoided social gatherings and extraneous events with you. Your conduct resulted in deciding She also planned to have to be the same as because she does not want to be alone with you. This is also an objectively reasonable response to the environment that was in, especially due to the relationship between you and (supervisor-subordinate and mentor-mentee) and position of power that you held as the Dean of the College of Law, an institution that was . Pursuant to this Investigation, there is enough information to conclude that you have violated the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures prohibiting sexual harassment. Recommendations that address this specific conclusion have been referred to the appropriate Department head for review and consideration. Recommendations that address this specific conclusion have been referred to the appropriate Department head for review and consideration. This matter is now considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by either party by submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President of Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten (1 0) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that discrimination or harassment has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be discrimination or harassment in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning discrimination or harassment. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Affmnative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-5560 or gg~...mskil@!ti!!,~du. cc: Michelle Jolmson, Title Investigator, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Affirmative Action File Nunho..\u00b7mlllin\u2022,is Unh<:rshr ts an Equal Oplwnunii)\u2022/Atlinnatlvt: A(tiun ln~titulion Sent Via E-mail Attachment To: From: Eric Dannenmaier, Dean College of Law Sarah Adamski, Associate Director Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance sadamski 1 @niu.e9J! Date: April 14, 2017 Northern Illinois University Aflirmalive Action and Equity Compliance Affinuat1ve Action and I!quity Compliance Swen Parson Hall 110 DeKalb, Olinols 6011S-2U28 815-753-1118 Fax815-753-1001 [email protected] Re: Official Report of Findings for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassme11t that filed agaiJtstyou, dated February 15, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the Affirmative Action Complaint of sexual harassment that filed against you, dated February 15, 2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issue that formed the basis of this investigation is as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that you sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that you sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace On February 15, 2017, filed a Complaint of sexual harassment against you. The Complaint alleged that you engaged in comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. In order for the comments and language to constitute a form of sexual harassment, the comments and/or conduct must be ( 1) unwelcomed, (2) conduct of a sexual nature, that is (3) severe and/or pervasive enough to have the purpose or effect of interfering with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. The reasonable person standard is the test used to determine whether or not a reasonable person in the same and/or similar circumstances would find the comments and/or conduct to be of a sexual nature and severe and/or pervasive enough to interfere with work performance and/or to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. On February 22, 2017 and March 9, 2017, you were provided an opportunity to respond to these allegations during an interview with myself, Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, and Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator. After both interviews, you were provided a copy of the summary of the interview, which allowed for you to verify the summary for completeness and accuracy. You added Netlthcrn lltinuis Unlvert.h)' il' :~n (qual Opportu n i ty/~flh'll'l~tt l \\'c ,..\\(titm Institution information into these documents to ensure such. You also provided additional information on April 11, 2017, in response to an email that was sent to you on April7, 2017, requesting specific information. After your first interview, you also provided documentation of various conversations with and a cover memorandum, which provided more information about the allegations. All pieces of documentary evidence were incorporated into the Investigation. Witness testimony from students, faculty and staff were also obtained during the Investigation. Similarly, all interviewees were provided a summary of their interview, which they also verified for completeness and accuracy. All verified summaries were incorporated into this Investigation. Pursuant to a thorough investigation, which included your responses, a review of documentary evidence provided by both parties and witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that you subjected to sexual harassment while . Each element necessary to support a claim of sexual harassment will be discussed separately below. (1) Conduct of a Sexual Nature As a result of a careful and thorough review of the above information presented during my interview with you, witnesses and presented documentation (as described above), there was enough information to conclude that it is more probable than not that you made comments to that were sexual in nature. Specifically, your testimony included your failure to deny or recall the following: \u2022 Asked specific questions regarding dating life; \u2022 Made generalizations about women giving more than men sexually; \u2022 Asked if she engaged in ; \u2022 Held conversations regarding the nature of romantic and sexual relationships engaged in while attending a \u2022 Made inappropriate references regarding whether or not was \"good with his hands;\" \u2022 Called at 9:00 p.m. to discuss a program and invited her to your home to spend the night; \u2022 During dinner on or about August 19, 2016, you asked a \"number of things\" that included: o Conversations about sexual activity; o Telling her that you were \"good with [your] mouth\" in a sexually suggestive manner; o Asking if she believed (in reference to swallowing male semen); o Suggesting girls told you that male \"semen\" tasted different ; o Asking how often had sex generally; o Whether the sex that had was casual or not; o Inquired about when was the first and last time engaged in sexual activity; o Inquired whether the sexual activity engaged in was good or not because deserved to be treated well sexually; and o Asking if she touches herself sexually and what she thinks about when she does. \u2022 Discussed with relationship with ; \u2022 Exclaiming love you as a friend\" to \u2022 Told \"another time, another place\" on two (2) occasions, with an inference that a sexual relationship could exist post-employment; \u2022 References to programs that you and developed as being \"babies\" The statements above illustrate your admissions and those that you were not able to categorically \"deny\" as indicated by your repeated response that \"you did not recall\" making the alleged statements. Northern lllinuls Univcrt.il)' 1:<> em tqu 0 1)ponuniry/Anirmallv\\: ~<:litHl lnstittllioo Additionally, there was also enough information gathered during the investigation to conclude that you have made similar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff, thereby further corroborating version of the events. These remarks, conduct and/or connotations included, but were not limited to, comments of a sexual nature you made during your Constitutional Law class ) and comments regarding appearance during faculty meetings ), an allegation that you deny making despite multiple testimonies saying otherwise. Numerous witnesses also testified that you commented about \"dating\" a female candidate for hire and hugging a female professor without her approval and/or request. Moreover, during the Investigation, you provided information that contradicted earlier testimony on several occasions. For example, initially, you suggested that the dinner on August 19,2016 with at your home involved general conversation only and did not involve sex. However, later during the Investigation, you stated that the conversation included a \"number of topics, including sex.\" Despite my clear request to explain whether or not you engaged in conversations of a sexual nature on the day in question, you initially denied such conversations occurred and only later admitted that you engaged in sexual conversations with on the other hand, provided consistent testimony during the course of the Investigation. Her testimony was consistent with the testimonies provided by faculty, staff and students and there is no cause to believe that such testimonies were altered and/or scripted to provide for corroboration as these witnesses were largely unaware of the existence of Complaint and allegations contained therein. Without prompting or disclosing details of the Complaint, faculty and staff voluntarily provided information about your interactions with which corroborated her testimony. testimony as deemed credible, coupled with your inconsistent/incomplete testimony, lack of clear denial, admission that you engaged in conduct of a sexual nature as well as corroborating witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that you engaged in conduct of a sexual nature with during the tenure of her employment. (2) Unwelcomed asserts that despite her outright and contemporaneous protest to your conduct on at least two (2) occasions, the acquiescence and lack of objection was the result of her desire to avoid conflict due to the supervisory relationship and power differential between you, as Dean of the College of Law, and her, your subordinate . In contrast, you assert that engaged in a mutual and sociable friendship with you that indicated informality and banter was accepted and welcomed. This was evidenced in the numerous pages of text messages between you and indicating a mutual and friendly relationship. You also assert that the operated in a \"collaborative and participatory style\" and you made it clear that you wanted to work \"with\" you, not \"for\" you. You also assert that personality as a \"strong \" would have caused her to say something to you and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of their occurrence. You also question whether the Complaint was filed in good faith as After consideration of the testimonies, the evidence renders it more likely than not that your conduct was unwelcomed by First, the fact that outright protests only occurred on two (2) occasions does not bar a determination of unwelcomeness. This lack of protest may be the result of a fear of repercussion, which is reasonable to conclude in the matter at hand due to the Northern Illinois Unhc~l itn Equal Opponunll)'/.-\\ntrmali\\'\\! Atliun ln:C:tiluti<m . felt isolated from faculty based upon your comments about being your \"ally,\" telling her that the faculty (especially the female faculty) to faculty and staff, and requesting emails be sent through you, which you assert was to receive a more prompt response. Moreover, the close proximity of your working spaces ) reasonably concludes that did not feel comfortable protesting against the sexual comments for fear of retribution from you directly, the potential risk of jeopardizing her ability to be successful in the position and increased speculation by the faculty and staff that she . Moreover, it is reasonable to conclude that reliance upon you, as Dean of the College of Law, for a favorable reference for future employment and assistance in obtaining the next step in her career, whether it was inside or outside the College, could reasonably serve as a reason why she was not comfortable protesting against your conduct of a sexual nature at that time. Additionally, as stated by informal and friendly communications with you was a way to get work done and had been established by you very early in the working relationship. , it is reasonable to conclude that would not protest against this relationship and would believe that, as Dean of the College of Law, you would be experienced with the set of formal, ethical, and lawful workplace boundaries that should be established. The informal workplace envirorunent often resulted in after-hours work and late night phone calls that were friendly and mutual between you and Especially given the amount of time that you and spent with one another, a level of informality was established and occurred, to no objection by Therefore, it is reasonable that engaged in friendly banter with you, despite her unwelcomeness to your sexual commentary and language. However, welcomeness to friendly conduct also does not equate to welcomeness to sexual conduct. did not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking you reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature. did not initiate sexually explicit or charged commentary or language with you that would have indicated that such type of behavior was welcomed. Moreover, you continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after you were explicitly informed by , on August 19,2016, that the conduct that was sexual in nature made her feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures. (3) Severe and Pervasive Enough to Create a Hostile Work Environment Lastly, there was enough information to conclude that your unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for was a direct result of the unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that she was subjected to by you . \" and attempted to avoid one-on-one interactions with you as much as possible in order to not be subjected to the conduct that she deemed to be unwelcomed. As noted by staff, would attempt to avoid extraneous one-on-one interactions with you and would attempt to have meetings in your office, rather than the new office space which was located downstairs as she felt more \"protected\" in an area where more administrative personnel were located. This is also an objectively reasonable response to the environment that was in, especially due to the relationship between you and (supervisor-subordinate) and position of power that you held as the Dean of the College of Law, an institution that Pursuant to this Investigation, there is enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier has violated the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures prohibiting sexual harassment. Recommendations that address this specific conclusion have been referred to the appropriate Department head for review and consideration. Northern lllfn\u2022til' Unhcr .s:il)l is an Equal OpJ)()rtunlt')'/~flirmotrh'c .-\\ctiun Mil HUlon This matter is now considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by either party by submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President of Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten 0) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy, as well as federal and state Jaws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that discrimination or harassment has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be discrimination or harassment in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning discrimination or harassment. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-5560 or sadamskil@niu .. ~\u00a3!1!.\u00b7 cc: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator Affirmative Action File NurtMm llllnnts Unh <!n>it}' is. {tn Equal Opporwnity/Affimmth\u00b7e .-\\cHun lnstilulloo Sent Via E-mail Attachme11t To: From: Dr. Lisa Freeman, Executive Vice President and Provost Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost [email protected] Sarah Adamski, Associate Director oflnv Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance sa da.m..\[email protected],li.l;l. e<J.!! Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University Affirmative Action and l:'quity Compliance Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Swen Parson HallllO DcKalb, Illinois 60115-2828 815-753\u00b71118 fax 815-753-1001 [email protected] Re: Official Report of Fi11dings for the Affirmative Actio11 l11vestigation of the Complaints of Sexual Harassment that filed against Eric Da11nenmaier, dated February 15, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Afft.rmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the Affirmative Action Complaints of sexual harassment that filed against Eric Dannenmaier, Dean, College of Law (\"Dannenmaier\"), dated February 15,2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issues that formed the basis of this Investigation are as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace. Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace On February 15, 2017, separately filed a Complaint of sexual harassment against Dannenmaier. The Complaints alleged that Dannenmaier engaged in comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. In order for the comments and language to constitute a form of sexual harassment, the comments and/or conduct must be (1) unwelcomed, (2) conduct of a sexual nature, that is (3) severe and/or pervasive enough to have the purpose or effect of interfering with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. The reasonable person standard is the test used to determine whether or not a reasonable person in the same and/or similar circumstances would find the comments and/or conduct to be of a sexual nature and severe and/or pervasive enough to interfere with work performance and/or to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. Nurthcm Illinois Unh\u2022ersif)' i~ an Eqm\\1 Ormnrtunii}'/AJiinn;Ui\\\u00b7c Acrlun Institution On February 22, 2017 and March 9, 2017, Dannenmaier was provided an opportunity to respond to these allegations during an interview with myself, Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigation, and Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator. After both interviews, Dannenmaier was provided a copy of the summary of the interview, which allowed for him to verify the summary for completeness and accuracy. Dannenmaier added information into these documents to ensure his testimony was complete and accurate. Dannenmaier also provided additional information on April 1 , 2017, in response to an email that was sent to him on April 7, 2017 requesting specific information. After his first interview, Dannenmaier's also provided documentation of various conversations with and a cover memorandum, which provided more information about the allegations. All of the documentary evidence was incorporated into the Investigation. Witness testimony from students, faculty and staff was also obtained during the Investigation. Similarly, all interviewees were provided a summary of their interview, which they also verified for completeness and accuracy. All verified summaries were incorporated into this Investigation. Pursuant to a thorough investigation, which included Dannenmaier's responses, a review of documentary evidence provided by both parties and witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannerunaier subjected to sexual harassment while they were employed in their respective positions within the College of Law. Each element necessary to support a claim of sexual harassment will be discussed separately below. (1) Conduct of a Sexual Nature As a result of careful and thorough review of the above information presented during my interview with Dannenmaier, witnesses and presented documentation (as described above), there was enough information to conclude that it is more probable than not that Dannenmaier made comments to that were sexual in nature. Specifically, Dannerunaier's testimony included his failure to deny or recall the following as it relates to \u2022 Asked specific questions regarding dating life; \u2022 Made generalizations about women giving more than men sexually (which were interpreted by to include sexual overtone); \u2022 Asked if she engaged in sexual experimentation with females (which was interpreted by to include sexual overtone); \u2022 Held conversations regarding the nature of romantic and sexual relationships engaged in while attending a \u2022 Made inappropriate references regarding whether or not was \"good with his hands (indicating sexual overtones); \u2022 Called at 9:00 p.m. to discuss a program and invited her to his home to spend the night; \u2022 During dinner on or about August 19, 2016, Dannenmaier asked a \"number of things\" that included: o Conversations regarding sex; o Telling her that he was \"good with [his] mouth; o Asking if she believed (in reference to swallowing male semen); o Suggesting girls told him that \"semen\" tasted different o Asking how often had sex; o Whether the sex had was casual or not; o Inquired about when was the first and last time engaged in sexual activity; o If the sexual activity had was good or not because deserved to be treated well sexually; and o Asking if she touches herself sexually and what she thinks about when she does. \u2022 Discussed relationship with ; Nurthcm llllnul~ Unh CISh)' Is ;tn Equal 0Jlportunlt}'/Aitlnn<lllvc Acttcll\\ lnstllut1on \u2022 Exclaiming love you as a friend\" to \u2022 Told \"another time, another place\" on two (2) occasions, with him inferring he intended to mean that a sexual relationship could exist post-employment; \u2022 References to programs that you and develop as being \"babies\" Dannerunaier's testimony also included his failure to deny or recall the following as it relates to \u2022 \u2022 Discussions pertaining to Dannerunaier's relationship \u2022 Asking \"Is it just sex or are you in love, because if its love you shouldn't have to be apart\" in regards to \u2022 Teasingly asking \"if she could have slept with someone else\" or \"she could do better;\" \u2022 On a car ride to with alone, discussing her relationship with and inquiring who else she had sex and a dating \u2022 During a one-on-one trip , eating dinner alone with and ordering drinks for her which were independent from conference activities; \u2022 Inviting to his home to meet individuals in environmental law; \u2022 \"You know, you and me, we'll find some project down the line\" or \"words to that effect\" inferring a reference to a relationship with her. \u2022 Repeatedly offering rides home after work; \u2022 Repeatedly inviting to his home mid-day to let his dogs out with him ; \u2022 Informing that if her plans were to stay in the local area , then national and international connections would be less valuable; and \u2022 Telling \"clearly you are training again\" wherein inferred this to be in reference to her body, fitness and muscle contours. In my opinion, the statements above illustrate Dannenmaier's admissions and those that he was not able to categorically \"deny\" as indicated by his repeated response that \"[he] did not recall\" making alleged statements, allowing for an inference that the conduct occurred as alleged if additional information to corroborate version of the events could be obtained. There was also enough information gathered during the Investigation to conclude that Dannenmaier has made similar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff: thereby corroborating version of the events. These remarks, conduct and/or colU1otations included, but were not limited to, comments of a sexual nature he made during his Constitutional Law class comments regarding appearance during faculty meetings (i.e., and reference to as a \" buddy.\"1 Numerous witnesses also testified that Dannenmaier commented about \"dating\" a female candidate for hire and hugged a female professor without her approval and/or request. Moreover, during the Investigation, Dannenmaier provided information that contradicted earlier testimony on several occasions. For example, initially, Dannerunaier suggested that the dinner on August 19, 2016 with at his home involved general conversation only and did not involve sex. However, later, 1 Dannenmaier denied making references to appearance and calling a \" buddy.\" However, numerous testimonies corroborate these allegations. Therefore, a conclusion has been rendered that such conunents were made. Nun hern llllnoi-.; Univc:~lt)' 'sun Equ~l Opportumt)\u2022/..\\rtlnnall\\'c Acliun lnstiiutlon Dannenmaier stated that the conversation included a \"number of topics, including sex.\" Despite my clear request to Dannenmaier to explain whether or not he engaged in conversations of a sexual nature on the day in question, he initially denied such conversations occurred and only later admitted that he engaged in sexual conversations with on the other hand, presented as credible complainants throughout the Investigation and provided consistent testimony. Their testimony was consistent with the testimonies provided by faculty, staff and students and there is no cause to believe that such testimonies were altered and/or scripted to provide for corroboration as these witnesses were largely unaware of the existence Complaint and allegations contained therein. Without prompting or disclosing details of either Complaint, faculty and staff voluntarily provided information about Dannenmaier's interactions with which corroborated their testimony. As were deemed as credible, Dannenmaier's responses, lack of denial, several admissions by him that he engaged in conduct of a sexual nature as well as corroborating witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier engaged in conduct of a sexual nature with during the tenure of their employment. In short, there was enough information to conclude that the version of events as presented by both was true and more credible than the version presented by Dannenmaier. (2) Unwelcomed assert that despite their outright and contemporaneous protest to his conduct on few occasions ( protested on two (2) occasions and protested on one (1) occasion), the acquiescence and lack of objection was the result of their desire to avoid conflict due to the supervisory relationship and power differential between Dannenmaier, as Dean of the College of Law, and them, as subordinates, and . In contrast, Dannenmaier asserts that both individuals engaged in a mutual and sociable friendship with Da1lllenmaier that indicated informality and banter was accepted and welcomed. This was evidenced in the numerous pages of text messages between Dannenmaier, indicating a mutual and friendly relationship. Dannenmaier also asserts that the operated in a \"collaborative and participatory style\" and he made it clear that he wanted to work \"with\" him, not \"for'' him. Dannenmaier also asserts that their personalities as a \"strong \" would have caused them to say something to him and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of their occurrence. Dannenmaier also questions whether the Complaint was filed in good faith as may have felt After consideration of the testimonies, the evidence renders it more likely than not that Dannenmaier's conduct was unwelcomed by both First, the fact that their outright protests only occurred on a few occasions does not bar a determination of unwelcomeness. This lack of protest may be the result of a fear of repercussion, which is reasonable to conclude in the matter at hand. Regarding NtNi hcm Jllln\u2022JI:.- Unlv-crslfy Is ''n Equal 0p(J(}f1Uilfi)'/A.flirm.lli\\'\\! .-\\(tluo ln~tilu l lon In light of this power differential and supervisory relationship that existed between Dannenmaier- and Dannenmaier- felt isolated from faculty based upon Dannenmaier's comments about them being his \"ally's,\" telling them that the faculty (especially the female faculty) did not trust them or their ability to do the job, that he is \"always\" defending them to faculty and staff, and requesting emails be sent through him (which he asserts was to receive a more prompt response). Moreover, the close proximity of their working spaces could reasonably result in both individuals feeling uncomfortable about protesting against the sexual comments for fear of retribution from Dannenmaier directly, the potential risk of jeopardizing their ability to be successful in the position and increased speculation by the faculty and staff . Moreover, it is reasonable to conclude that reliance upon Dannenmaier, as Dean of the College of Law, for a favorable reference for future employment and assistance in obtaining the next step in their careers, whether it was inside or outside the College, served as a reason why they were not comfortable protesting against his conduct. Additionally, as stated by , informal and friendly communications with Dannenmaier was a way to get work done and had been established by him very early in the working relationship. , it is reasonable to conclude that would not protest against this relationship and would believe that, as Dean of the College of Law, he would be experienced enough with the set of formal, ethical, and lawful workplace boundaries that should be established. The informal workplace environment often resulted in after-hours work and late night phone calls that were friendly and mutual between Dannenmaier, Especially given the amount of time that he, spent with one another, a level of informality was established and occurred, to no objection by either party. Therefore, it is reasonable that engaged in friendly banter with him, despite their unwelcomeness to his sexual commentary and language. However, welcomeness to friendly conduct does not equate to welcomeness to sexual conduct. did not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking Dannenmaier reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature. They did not initiate sexually explicit or charged commentary or language with him that would have indicated that such type of behavior was welcomed. Moreover, Dannenmaier continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after he was explicitly informed , that his behavior and conduct made them feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures. (3) Severe and Pervasive Enough to Create a Hostile Work Environment Lastly, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier's unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for was a direct result of the unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that they were subjected to by Dannenmaier . attempted to avoid one-on-one interactions with Dannenmaier as much as possible in order to not be subjected to the conduct that she deemed to be unwelcomed. As noted by staff, would attempt to avoid extraneous one-on-one interactions with him and would attempt to have 2 Nwlt~rn lllin\u2022Jis Vni\\'t'r:o>it)' i~ <m Equal 0J)})Ortunit}'/-\\thrmfllh t Attinn ln~ll lution meetings in his office, rather than her new office space which was located downstairs in an effort to ensure all interactions occurred around administrative persoiUlel as a sense of\"protection\" from repeated conduct by Dannenmaier. . In December, questioned DaiUlenmaier about the work she was performing and reaffirmed her initial desire to work on . DaiUlenmaier offered for her to come in during nights and weekends to work on . declined due to her level of discomfort with him, further away from DaiUlenmaier to avoid further contact with him. would interrupt meetings they were in with Dannerunaier to ensure they did not run long or past 4:30p.m., (which is close of business), specifically to avoid being with Dannenmaier after hours. and uncomfortable as a result of his sexual conduct. Also according to witness testimony, would attempt to avoid one-on-one extraneous interactions with him also avoided social gatherings and extraneous events with DaiUlenmaier as a result of his behavior. Based upon the investigation in this regard, there was enough information to conclude that DaiUlenmaier conduct of a sexual nature was severe and/or pervasive enough to unreasonably interfere with the work environment by creating a hostile, offensive and/or intimidating workplace. Hence, there was enough information to conclude, as evidenced by the information gathered, that DaiUlenmaier violated university policy and procedures prohibiting sexual harassment in the workplace. In closing, a list of specific recommendations that address this specific conclusion will be forthcoming under separate memorandum and will be consistent of findings and recommendations from similar cases. As this if a case of first impression whereby a department or division head at this level has been accused of and found responsible for the creation of a hostile work environment, specifically for the Complainants of a Complaint and more broadly, for the College as whole, additional review of previous cases to ensure consistency needs to occur. Upon complet!on of this review, and in addition to such, please be advised that it is recommended that corrective action as deemed warranted and necessary to address these findings and conclusions should promptly occur as indicated in the Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Complaint Procedures. This matter is now considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. Both parties have been advised of their appeal rights and such appeal must be submitted within ten (1 0) workdays after the date of their receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that discrimination or harassment has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be discrimination or harassment in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning discrimination or harassment. Should you experience what you believe Nn, lhoern lllinl)ls Uni\\ et toOJI)' Is nn Equ~ l 01)portunity/ o.\\llirm;lfl o.\\ctinn lnslitution to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-5560 or [email protected]. cc: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliace Affirmative Action File Nonhern lllfn<ll\u2022 Unll\u00b7cr<lry an [qual Opponunlry/Afflrrnall\\'t Acllon ln\u2022llrullon Sent Via E-mail Attachment To: From: Sarah Adamski, Associate Director ofl:nv l Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance \u00a7.l!4l!mskil@nilJ.,_~u Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University A(firmaUve Action and Equiry Compliance Afflm1attve Action and Equity Compliance SWen Parson HallllO DeKalb.!Uinols 60115-2828 815-753-1118 Fa.'t 815-753-1001 [email protected] aaec Re: Official Report of Findings for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassment thatyouftled against Eric Dannenmaier, dated February 15,2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the Affirmative Action Complaint of sexual harassment that you filed against Eric Dannenmaier, Dean, College of Law (\"Dannenmaier\"), dated February 15,2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issue that formed the basis of this investigation is as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed you by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there was enough evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier sexually harassed you by using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace On February 15,2017, you filed a Complaint of sexual harassment against Dannenmaier. The Complaint alleged that Dannenmaier engaged in comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment. In order for the comments and language to constitute a form of sexual harassment, the comments and/or conduct must be (1) unwelcomed, (2) conduct of a sexual nature, that is (3) severe and/or pervasive enough to have the purpose or effect of interfering with work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. The reasonable person standard is the test used to determine whether or not a reasonable person in the same and/or similar circumstances would find the comments and/or conduct to be of a sexual nature and severe and/or pervasive enough to interfere with work performance and/or to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. On February 22, 2017 and March 9, 2017, Dannenmaier was provided an opportunity to respond to these allegations during an interview with myself, Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, and Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator. You were interviewed on February 15, 2017 and a follow-up interview was conducted on March 10, 2017. After all interviews, both parties were provided a copy of the Northl.'m llllnu4s Unhc:rslt}\u00b7 ls an Equal Opponunlt)'/,..\\fllnYIOlfh't.' Ac:flf.n lnsthul ioo summary of the interview, which allowed for verification for completeness and accuracy. Both parties added information into these documents to ensure such. All parties provided additional information in response to emails requesting specific information. After Dannenmaier' s first interview, Dannenmaier also provided documentation of various conversations with you and a cover memorandum, which provided more information about the allegations. All pieces of documentary evidence were incorporated into the Investigation. Witness testimony from students, faculty and staff were also obtained during the Investigation. Similarly, all interviewees were provided a summary of their interview, which they also verified for completeness and accuracy. All verified summaries were incorporated into this Investigation. Pursuant to a thorough investigation, which included Dannenmaier's responses, a review of documentary evidence provided by both parties and witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier subjected you to sexual harassment while you were employed within the College of Law. Each element necessary to support a claim of sexual harassment will be discussed separately below. (1) Conduct of a Sexual Nature As a result of a careful and thorough review of the above information presented during my interview with Dannenmaier, you, witnesses and presented documentation (as described above), there was enough information to conclude that it is more probable than not that Dannenmaier made comments to you that were sexual in nature. Specifically, Dannenmaier's testimony included his failure to deny or recall the following: \u2022 Asked specific questions regarding your dating life; \u2022 Made generalizations about women giving more than men sexually; \u2022 Asked you if you engaged in ; \u2022 Held conversations regarding the nature of romantic and sexual relationships you engaged in while attending a \u2022 Made inappropriate references regarding whether or not d was \"good with his hands;\" \u2022 Called you at 9:00 p.m. to discuss a program and invited you to his home to spend the night; \u2022 During dinner on or about August 19, 2016, Dannenmaier asked you a \"number of things\" that included: o Conversations about sexual activity; o Telling you that he was \"good with [his] mouth\" in a sexually suggestive manner; o Asking you if you believed (in reference to swallowing male semen); o Suggesting girls told him that male \"semen\" tasted different if o Asking how often you had sex generally; o Whether the sex that you had was casual or not; o Inquired about when was the first and last time you engaged in sexual activity; o Inquired whether the sexual activity you engaged in was good or not because you deserved to be treated well sexually; and o Asking you if you touch yourself sexually and what you think about when you do. \u2022 Discussed with you relationship with ; \u2022 Exclaiming love you as a friend\" to you; \u2022 Told you \"another time, another place\" on two (2) occasions, with an inference that a sexual relationship could exist post\u00b7employment; and \u2022 Reference programs that you and he developed as being \"babies.\" Norlhcrn lllinuis Unhersity is im tqu<tl Opportunlty/Arfiml<llh\\: Ac:tinn ln!\"titution The statements above illustrate Dannenmaier's admissions and those that he was not able to categorically \"deny\" as indicated by his repeated response that he \"did not recall\" making the alleged statements. Additionally, there was also enough inf01mation gathered during the investigation to conclude that Dannenmaier have made similar remarks and connotations of a sexual nature to students, faculty and staff, thereby further corroborating your version of the events. These remarks, conduct and/or connotations included, but were not limited to, comments of a sexual nature Dannenmaier made during his Constitutional Law class ) and comments regarding your appearance during faculty meetings ), an aUegation that Dannenmaier denies making despite multiple testimonies concluding otherwise. Numerous witnesses also testified that Dannenmaier commented about \"dating\" a female candidate for hire and hugging a female professor without her approval and/or request. Moreover, during the Investigation, Dannenmaier provided information that contradicted earlier testimony on several occasions. For example, initially, Dannenmaier suggested that the dinner on August 19, 2016 with you at his home involved general conversation only and did not involve sex. However, later during the Investigation, Dannenmaier stated that the ~onversation included a ''number of topics, including sex.\" Despite my clear request to explain whether or not Dannemnaier engaged in conversations of a sexual nature on the day in question, Dannenmaier initially denied such conversations occurred and only later admitted that he engaged in sexual conversations with you. You, on the other hand, provided consistent testimony during the course of the Investigation. Your testimony was consistent with the testimonies provided by faculty, staff and students and there is no cause to believe that such testimonies were altered and/or scripted to provide for corroboration as these witnesses were largely unaware of the existence of your Complaint and allegations contained therein. Without prompting or disclosing details of the Complaint, faculty and staff voluntarily provided information about Dannenmaier's interactions with you, which corroborated your testimony. Your testimony as deemed credible, coupled with Dannenmaier's inconsistent/incomplete testimony, lack of clear denial, admission that he engaged in conduct of a sexual nature as well as corroborating witness testimony, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier engaged in conduct of a sexual nature with you during the tenure of your employment. (2) Unwelcomed You assert that despite your outright and contemporaneous protest to Dannenmaier's conduct on at least two (2) occasions, the acquiescence and lack of objection was the result of your desire to avoid conflict due to the supervisory relationship and power differential between Dannenmaier, as Dean of the College of Law, and you, his subordinate and . In contrast, Dannenrnaier asserted that you engaged in a mutual and sociable friendship with him that indicated informality and banter was accepted and welcomed. This was evidenced in the numerous pages of text messages between Dannenmaier and you, indicating a mutual and friendly relationship. Dannenmaier also asserted that the operated in a \"collaborative and participatory style\" and Dannemnaier made it clear that he wanted you to work \"with\" him, not \"for\" him. Dannenmaier also assert that your personality as a \"strong \" would have caused you to say something to him and/or take advantage of resources on campus to address the alleged behavior at the time of their occurrence. Dannenmaier also questioned whether the Complaint was filed in good faith Nut them illinois Unh Sify is ;,m C:QUill Opportunit)'f..),rflnnath\u00b7c A(\u00b7llun lnstitUIIOn After consideration of the testimonies, the evidence renders it more likely than not that Dannenmaier's conduct was unwelcomed by you. First, the fact that your outright protests only occurred on two (2) occasions does not bar a determination of unwelcomeness. This lack of protest may be the result of a fear of repercussion, which is reasonable to conclude in the matter at hand due to the ''obsolete\"-ness and \"chaos\" of that Dannenmaier described you worked in. You were new and unfamiliar to your role and relied on Dannenmaier as Dean of the College of Law and as your supervisor for support, direction, and advice to be successful in your role. You felt isolated from faculty based upon Dannenmaier's comments about you being his \"ally,\" telling you that the faculty (especially the female faculty) did not trust you or your ability to do the job, that he was \"always\" defending you to faculty and staff, and requesting emails be sent through him, which Dannenmaier asserted was to receive a more prompt response. Moreover, the close proximity of Dannenmaier's working spaces reasonably concludes that you did not feel comfortable protesting against the sexual comments for fear of retribution from Dannenmaier directly, the potential risk of jeopardizing your ability to be successful in the position and increased speculation by the faculty and staff . Moreover, it is reasonable to conclude that your rei iance upon Dannenmaier, as Dean of the College of Law, for a favorable reference for future employment and assistance in obtaining the next step in your career, whether it was inside or outside the College, could reasonably serve as a reason why you were not comfortable protesting against Dannenmaier' s conduct of a sexual nature at that time. Additionally, as you stated, informal and friendly communications with Dannenmaier was a way to get work done and had been established by him very early in the working relationship. it is reasonable to conclude that you would not protest against this relationship and would believe that, as Dean of the College of Law, Dannenmaier would be experienced with the set of formal, ethical, and lawful workplace boundaries that should be established. The informal workplace environment often resulted in after-hours work and late night phone calls that were friendly and mutual between you and Dannenmaier. Especially given the amount of time that you and Dannenmaier spent with one another, a level of informality was established and occurred, to no objection by you. Therefore, it is reasonable that you engaged in friendly banter with Dannenmaier, despite your unwelcomeness to his sexual commentary and language. However, welcomeness to friendly conduct does not equate to welcomeness to sexual conduct. You did not reciprocate the unprompted or unsolicited sexual comments or language by asking Dannenmaier reciprocal questions or comments of a sexual nature. You did not initiate sexually explicit or charged commentary or language with Dannenmaier that would have indicated that such type of behavior was welcomed. Moreover, Dannenmaier continued to engage in the complained of comments and language after you explicitly informed him on August 19, 2016, that the conduct that was sexual in nature made you feel uncomfortable, thereby making any further comments unwelcome in nature and actionable under sexual harassment laws, policies and procedures. (3) Severe and Pervasive Enough to Create a Hostile Work Environment Lastly, there was enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier's unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile working environment for you. was a direct result of the unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that you were subjected to by Dannenmaier . You described your work as \"miserable\" and attempted to avoid one-on-one interactions with Dannenmaier as much as possible in order to not be subjected to the conduct that you deemed to be unwelcomed. As noted by staff, you would attempt to avoid extraneous one-on-one interactions with Dannenmaier and would attempt to have meetings in his office, rather than as you felt more \"protected\" in an area where more administrative personnel were located. This is also an objectively reasonable response to the environment that you were in, especially due to the relationship between Dannenmaier and you (supervisor-subordinate) and position Nvrthcllllllinuls Unh ttsit}' iN an Equ;\\1 Qpporlunily/-\\l'l'lrmilll\\'c Acctun ln. ..... llutllm of power that Da!Ulenmaier held as the Dean of the College of Law, an institution that Pursuant to this Investigation, there is enough information to conclude that Dannenmaier has violated the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures prohibiting sexual harassment. Recommendations that address this specific conclusion have been referred to the appropriate Department head for review and consideration. This matter is now considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by either party by submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President of Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten (10) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that discrimination or harassment has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be discrimination or harassment in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing concerning discrimination or harassment. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-5560 or [email protected]. cc: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator Affumative Action File Nu1thcrn lllfnuls Univen.ily Is\"\" Et1ual Opp6rtunilr/-\\rnrnmli :\\ellnn l nstllullon Se~tt via Electronic Mail Auacltment To: Student l From: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance .mi9lm~nl@n!!!~Ydt! Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University A(ffrmar\u00a3ve Actfon and Equity Compliance Affirmative Action and \"quity Compliance Lowden Hall 1 0 1 J>cKalb.lllinois 60115-2028 815\u00b7753-1 118 Fax B15-753-1001 [email protected] Re: Official Report of Fi~tdilags for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassment and Stalking that you filed agailzst Eric Dannenmaier, dated February 19, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the complaint of sexual harassment and stalking that you filed against Eric Dannenmaier, Dean of the College of Law (\"Dannenmaier''), dated February 19, 2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issues that formed the basis of this Investigation are as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Eric Dannenmaier sexually harassed you , 2017. Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Eric Dannenmaier stalked you on or about , 2017 After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there is insufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that Dannenmaier stalked and/or sexually harassed you , 2017 Title of the Education Amendments of 1972,20 U.S.C. \u00a71681 et. seq., provides in part: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participating in, be denied benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under a~y education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance ... Northern Illinois University complies with Title by prohibiting sex discrimination in the form of sexual misconduct. Sexual misconduct includes acts of sexual harassment and stalking. The allegations made against Dannenmaier, stalking and sexual harassment, will be discussed separately below. Nm1hcrn llllrwts Unhcr:-.h)' f'i otn l:.qual Opporrunlt)\u2022/Atnrm:tth \\: -\\('tlun lnStllutlnn A. Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcomed verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature sufficiently severe and/or pervasive enough that it unreasonably limits and/or denies a person from participating in or benefiting from the University's educational programs, activities, and/or employment. It may be based upon a power differential or the creation of a hostile environment (reasonably severe conduct that is sufficiently pervasive to have the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with work performance, or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment). According to your complaint, it was alleged that Dannenmaier engaged in unwelcomed conduct that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to cause a hostile environment for you. Specifically, you stated that Dannenmaier called on you to participate in the classroom discussion. you allege that Dannenmaier stated The day after the comment, , you were in the library. Dannenmaier entered the library and approached you. He attempted to discuss with you how the comment You attempted to leave the conversation with Dannenmaier, but he allegedly continued to talk to you. You alleged that Dannenmaier followed you out of the library and continued to attempt to talk to you about it. During the course of the investigation, you, Dannenmaier, and witnesses were interviewed. All individuals who provided testimony verified their statements for completeness and accuracy and such statements were incorporated into the investigation. Based upon the evidence gathered, it is more likely than not that Dannenmaier made the comment \" This conclusion is based upon his admission to such comment. Moreover, the evidence concludes that he also attempted to speak to you multiple times in the College of Law Library the following day, . This conclusion is also based upon his admission. In order for the above conduct to constitute a fonn of sexual harassment, as defined by University policy, the conduct must be: (1) unwelcomed, (2) sexual in nature and (3) sufficiently severe and/or pervasive enough to create a hostile environment. (1) Unwelcomed The evidence renders it more likely than not that the classroom comment and library interaction was unwelcomed as there is no evidence supporting a conclusion that you requested and/or welcomed the comments. You volunteered information as it pertained to a classroom discussion about . Your participation in the classroom discussion does not support the conclusion that you should have expected and/or reasonably anticipated that Dannenmaier Regarding the library incident, you did not request a meeting with Da1menmaier and were in the process of trying to . Nurrhcm IIUnuis Uni\\tl sily Is ~n Etru<~ l Opportunii)'/Arflnnflli\\'.: Action lnstlturion (2) Sexual in nature The evidence also supports the conclusion that the comment in the classroom was sexual in nature. The incident in the library can also be described as sexual in nature because it was a continuation of the classroom experience. But for the sexual comment, Dannenmaier would likely not have approached you in the library and you would not have reacted in the same manner as you did. Therefore, the interaction in the library was based upon a sexual comment made the day before. (3) Severe and/or pervasive Despite the necessary first and second elements in a claim of sexual harassment being satisfied, there is not enough information to determine by a preponderance of the evidence that Dannenmaier's conduct was severe and/or pervasive enough to create a hostile environment. This element is viewed from both the subjective and objective perspective. Subjectively, you stated that Dannenrnaier's comment in the classroom . Additionally, you stated that you do not want to see Dannenmaier again and want him to be removed as your professor and Dean. Notwithstanding the subjective component being satisfied, there was not enough infonnation to conclude that Dannenmaier's conduct was severe and/or pervasive enough to unreasonably interfere with your academic environment. Dannenmaier's comment did not include sexually explicit terms and/or language that could be defined as \"severe\" as provided for by the law. Additionally, the comment was not accompanied by conduct of a physical nature that could be defined as severe in nature. Lastly, during the course of the conversation, only one (1) sexual comment was made that occurred on one (1) occasion; thus it can be defined as isolated in nature as it relates to you (despite evidence indicating he made other sexual connotations in the classroom). Dannenmaier's attempt to talk to you in the library was the result of his concern over your well-being as he was concerned that you were not alright and wanted to ensure that you, as well as all students in his College, had no impediments to their success. Therefore, it was reasonable for him to attempt to have a conversation with you for this purpose in the library and follow-up with you, even though you indicated verbally and physically that such was not okay. As a result, there is not enough evidence to conclude that Dannenmaier's comment was severe and/or pervasive enough to unreasonably interfere with your academic environment. Please be advised that this holding is not reflective of any additional investigatory result from any allegation relating to the overall academic environment as a result ofDannenmaier's comments and/or conduct in the class and only pertains to your complaint of sexual harassment. Despite a lack of a finding of a Policy violation, the comment that Dannenmaier made was inappropriate as Dean of the College of Law and will be reviewed by the appropriate university officials in this regard. B. Stalking Stalking is defined as engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or suffer substantial emotional distress. Course of conduct means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker follows, monitors, or observes another person. Reasonable person means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim. Substantial emotional distress means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling. The incident in the library on , as discussed above in detail, comprises the allegation of stalking. Satisfying the defmition of\"course of conduct\" requires proof of the engagement in two or more overt acts, such as following or monitoring. In this instance, it can be determined that Dannenmaier engaged in a course of conduct directed towards you because he approached you on two (2) occasions while in the library. Whether Dannenmaier had \"lawful justification,\" a defense in a claim of stalking, is questionable since he was concerned about you, which was evidenced by the actual interaction with you and his follow- up conversation with the Deans, requesting for them to \"look out'' for you. Moreover, as Dean of the College that you attend, it was reasonable for Dannenmaier to address concerns he believed resulted from his behavior. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that Dannenmaier had a lawful justification for engaging in the actions that he did with you on while in the library. However, there was not enough information to support a conclusion that Dannenmaier's actions would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or suffer substantial emotional distress, a necessary element in a claim of stalking. While the conduct was unwelcomed and perhaps unwarranted in your opinion, there was not enough information to support a conclusion of stalking. However, as previously indicated above, Dannenmaier's conduct will be referred to the appropriate university officials for further review, follow-up and recommendations at their discretion. This matter is considered closed and resolved. No further investigation will be conducted by into this matter unless facts and/or evidence warrant a subsequent review and/or investigation. The results of the Investigation may be appealed by either party submitting a written request of appeal to Dr. Anne Kaplan, Vice President for Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development. The appeal must be submitted within ten (10) workdays after the date of your receipt of this written Report regarding the Investigation, and must contain the specific reason for the appeal and/or facts that were not available at the time of the investigation Please also be advised that it is a violation of the University's Non-Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures, as well as federal and state laws, to retaliate against any individual who, in good faith, files a complaint alleging that sex discrimination has occurred, or because he or she has opposed that which he or she reasonably and in good faith believes to be sex discrimination in higher education, or because he or she has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any way in an investigation, NnNhtm lllinui.s Uni\\CI!'>il)' is i l Ec1u\"l Opportunitr/Affinnati\\'\\' :\\ctiu11 hl$11\\ution proceeding, or hearing concerning sex discrimination. Should you experience what you believe to be retaliation as defined above, please contact Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (AAEC) immediately. Thank you for your patience and assistance with this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (815) 753-6042 or [email protected]. cc: Sarah Adamski, Associate Director of Investigations, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance Affirmative Action File Northem llltnoll\\ Unh\u2022c:rsUy \u2022~ an [quat Opportunlty/AfOrmath\u00b7c: Action ln~clrullon Sent via Electronic Mail Attachment To: Eric Dannenmaier, Dean College of Law From: Michelle Johnson, Title Investigator Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance [email protected] Date: April14, 2017 Northern Illinois University Af(lrmative Action and Equity Compliance Affinnative Action and Equity Compliance Lowden HalllOl Dcl<alb, Illinois 60115\u00b72828 815-753-1118 Fax 815-753-1001 [email protected] Re: Official Report of Findings for the Affirmative Action Investigation of the Complaint of Sexual Harassment a11d Stalking that filed agai11st you, dated February 19, 2017 This memorandum represents the Official Report of the Findings related to the Affirmative Action Investigation (\"Investigation\") that was conducted by Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance (\"AAEC\") for the complaint of sexual harassment and stalking that Student ( filed against you dated February 19, 2017 comprehensive and thorough investigation was conducted. The issues that formed the basis of this Investigation are as follows: Whether there is sufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that you sexually harassed , 2017. Whether there is sufficient. evidence to render it more likely than not that you stalked on or about 2017 After a careful review of the evidence presented, University policy and applicable federal and state laws, there is insufficient evidence to render it more likely than not that you stalked and/or sexually harassed , 2017 Title of the Education Amendments of 1972,20 U.S.C. \u00a71681 et. seq., provides in part: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participating in, be denied benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance ... Northern Illinois University complies with Title by prohibiting sex discrimination in the form of sexual misconduct. Sexual misconduct includes acts of sexual harassment and stalking. The allegations made against you, stalking and sexual harassment, will be discussed separately below. Nunhern lllln Uuhe.nit)' I~ 010 Cquul C'>jJfJOtlunlty/Afl'lrm-alivc ACIIun JnMUUiiOn A. Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcomed verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature sufficiently severe and/or pervasive enough that it unreasonably limits and/or denies a person from participating in or benefiting from the University's educa6onal programs, activities, and/or employment. It may be based upon a power differential or the creation of a hostile environment (reasonably severe conduct that is sufficiently pervasive to have the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with work performance, or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment). According to complaint, it was alleged that you engaged in unwelcomed conduct that was sufficiently severe and pervasive enough to cause a hostile environment for Specifically, stated that you called on her to participate in the classroom discussion. The day after the comment, was in the library. You entered the library and approached her. You attempted to discuss with During the course of the investigation, you, and witnesses were interviewed. All individuals who provided testimony verified their statements for completeness and accuracy and such statements were incorporated into the investigation. Based upon the evidence gathered, it is more likely than not that you made the comment that had This conclusion is based upon your admission to such comment. This conclusion is also based upon your admission. In order for the above conduct to constitute a form of sexual harassment, as defined by University policy, the conduct must be: (1) unwelcomed, (2) sexual in nature and (3) sufficiently severe and/or pervasive enough to create a hostile environment. (1) Unwelcomed The evidence renders it more likely than not that the classroom comment and library interaction was unwelcomed as there is no evidence supporting a conclusion that requested and/or welcomed the comments. volunteered information as it pertained to a classroom discussion about . Regarding the library incident, did not request a meeting with you and was in the process of trying to . verbally indicated to you that she did not want to speak to you about the matter, which was also evident through her body language. There is also no evidence Nnrth<.'m Illinois. UnlvcrsHy ls un EquOJI OpporlUntl}'/Aittrmnltn.' Action lnsnmt1on supporting the conclusion that located yourself in the library knowing you were or would be there. In fact, walked away from you more than once to attempt to end the interaction. (2) Sexual in nature The evidence also supports the conclusion that the comment in the classroom was sexual in nature. The incident in the library can also be described as sexual in nature because it was a continuation of the classroom experience. But for the sexual comment, you would likely not have approached in the library and she would not have reacted in the same manner as she did. Therefore, the interaction in the library was based upon a sexual comment made the day before. (3) Severe and/or pervasive Despite the necessary flrst and second elements in a claim of sexual harassment being satisfied, there is not enough information to determine by a preponderance of the evidence that your conduct was severe and/or pervasive enough to create a hostile environment. This element is viewed from both the subjective and objective perspective. Subjectively, Additionally, stated that she did not want to see you again and wanted you to be removed as her professor and Dean. Notwithstanding the subjective component being satisfied, there was not enough information to conclude that your conduct was severe and/or pervasive enough to unreasonably interfere with academic environment. Your comment did not include sexually explicit terms and/or language that could be defined as \"severe\" as provided for by the Jaw. Additionally, the comment was not accompanied by conduct of a physical nature that could be defmed as severe in nature. Lastly, during the course of the conversation, only one (1) sexual comment was made that occurred on one (1) occasion; thus it can be defmed as isolated in nature as it relates to (despite evidence indicating you made other sexual connotations in the classroom). You attempting to talk to in the library was the result of your concern over her well-being as you were concerned that she were not alright and wanted to ensure that as well as all students in your College, had no impediments to their success. Therefore, it was reasonable for you to attempt to have a conversation with for this purpose in the library and follow-up with her, even though she indicated verbally and physically that such was not okay. As a result, there is not enough evidence to conclude that your comment was severe and/or pervasive enough to unreasonably interfere with academic environment. Please be advised that this holding is not reflective of any additional investigatory result from any alJegation relating to the overall academic environment as a result of your comments and/or conduct in the class and only pertains to complaint of sexual harassment. Nurth\\\u2022m lllinuis Univtrr.ity is <.n Eqo.ll Opponunit}'/.-.\\Oinnati Actinn ln~nruuon Your Name* Phone number Email* '\u2022 i Victim/Claimant Information VIctim/Claimant's Name Phone number Email _ __I directory lookiJp Vlcthn/Clalf!lant's affillat1oit to (check aU that apply):* ~student [] Staff 0 Faculty fJ Unknown d Not affiliated Other: : \\. .\u00b7 : Offe'ndet{Res.pond~nt 'th\u00a36rrriadon (If unknown, type unknown) Offender/Respondent's Name * .... , i Eric Dannenmaier j\u00b7 '\u00b7-- . -\u00b7 Phone number 1/4 i ' _ Email Offender/Respondent's affiliation to (check all that apply Student Staff ~Faculty (] Unknown Cl Not affiliated iJ Other Dean of Law School Note:;l,f .there i$ more than one offender please list additi.onal offender information here: * f l Incident Information Police File (CFS) Number Types of sexual misconduct experienced (check all that apply): * .d Sexual Harassment (quid pro quo)- sexual advance or request for sexual favors Sexual Harassment (hostile environment) - verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, of any kind and in any form, which interferes with the academic or employment experience because it has created an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment Cl Sexual Violence- Sexual contact without consent [) Sexual Assault - Non-consensual intercourse or penetration ~ Stalking - unwanted following, calling, or contact by any means by a person wh,o has been told to stop that has caused substantial emotional distress or fear of safety \u00b7 \u00b7 ' \u00b7\u00b7 l_j Dating Violence - phy$ical, emotional, psychological, and/or sexual violence, within a dating relationship Domestic Violence -physical abuse, harassment, intimidation of a dependent, interference with personal liberty or wiiJ.ful deprivation within a family or household member (including spouses) Ll Sexual Explortation -taking non-consensual or abusive sexual advantage of another Voyeurism - non-consensual viewing or recording any person engaging in sexual activity and/or their sexual organs Other act(s) of sexual misconduct not described above hltp:l/ - --- - - ----- 2/4 \u00b7Approximat~ date of incident: * mf.l Locatl911($) of Jncldeot (check thaf apply);* ~ On campus Off campus fJ re:sldence hall NIU-afflllated sororily/fratern!ty f Nil) eve.nVaativ1ty 0 N'.Ot sore of location f:] Otherij ! If th\u00b7e lncfdent o.ccurred .off. .. campus, pleas~ provid~rthe street nar:ne If known D'iJse.riptlon of ll)cldenf: * See-file Title summary finat.~ ~ \\.',\u2022i).,:\\ '\u00b7 :::, \u2022, :~ ; .... Upload: a.ddltlonal dot:umeQtatloi ,---- L.~h~os ftle. qh~se~ ---- --\u00b7 T111e JX..Summaq.Jioal.q9ftX (14k). [ U_plo~d l Delet~ Do you. w.ant th.e Pol!cv to QQ~~e_t~ and follow .pn -th.is matter? 1 Yes ~No The foR-owing indiVic:1vals have tlie a!Jth()tity to mak~ a finding or to impose \u00b7a sanction in a Title proceeding, \u2022 Kare.n L. aaker,Associat~ Vice Pfesident .and Title Cpordinator. Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance \u2022 Sarah Adamski. Associate Director of lhvestlgatlon;s {#ltrpeputy Title 1X Cobrdlha'tor, Affirmative Action and Equity cdmp/Jahi)~' . \u00b7 \u00b7 \u00b7 \u00b7 \u00b7 \u00b7 . \u2022 Mlch~lle Johtlson, Title Investigator, Affirmatlv.e Action and Equfty tomptfance \u2022 Jeanne ~yer, Director, St,vd~nt Conduct 1 Deputy Title tX Coordinator ~ Brian Glick, As$Oclate Dir.ector;.Stuclent Conduct. If any of these individuals' partiCipation in the Title pt<>~ss poses a cortflict of interest, the Victim/Claimant and Offender /Respondent have the opportunity to request a substitution. The explanation for the request for sobstituttor' must be sent to [email protected] withi~ 48 hours upon notice. of complaint. \u00b7 \u00b7 http:h t", "7467_107.pdf": "Northern Star Advertisement 14\u00b0 and Clear Sky | Gentle Breeze \uf39e \uf16d \ue07b Northern Illinois University\u2019s student media since 1899 Search ... \uf002 Ensure student journalism survives. Donate today. Trending: Housing Guide Campus News News Opinion Sports Lifestyle More Express Yourself Northern \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f Former law dean takes legal action against By Lindsey Salvatelli July 24, 2017 DeKALB hearing for a temporary restraining order filed by the former College of Law dean against is scheduled for Sept. 1. Eric Dannenmaier, former College of Law dean, sought a temporary restraining order against to block officials from releasing information regarding an investigation into complaints of sexual harassment made against Dannenmaier by two former employees. Greg Brady, acting vice president and general counsel, notified Dannenmaier\u2019s attorney Jennifer Murphy he intended to respond to three requests the university received about Dannenmaier by releasing a redacted version of the investigation\u2019s findings as well as the appeal decision, according to the petition, as he was required to do so by law. Dannenmaier\u2019s attorney filed a temporary restraining order July 6 that was granted by Judge Bradley Waller of the 23rd Judicial Circuit Court the following day. The injunction seeks to protect Dannenmaier from harm to his professional and personal reputation, according to the petition. Some of the information contained in the investigations is exempt under Illinois\u2019 Freedom of Information Act statute, according to Dannenmaier\u2019s petition. The two investigations contain conversations between Dannenmaier and the two former employees that occurred outside of work hours; Dannenmaier\u2019s attorneys claim that since those conversations did not occur on the job, releasing such information is tantamount to \u201can unjustified intrusion upon his seclusion \u201d according to the Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f unjustified intrusion upon his seclusion, according to the petition. NIU\u2019s investigation was conducted like an adjudication process, which is one of the exemptions under Illinois Freedom of Information statutes. An adjudication process is a way in which to formally settle a dispute outside of the court system. Under the statute, final outcomes of adjudications related to employee grievances and disciplinary cases may only be released if a disciplinary action was imposed. Dannenmaier resigned from his position before any disciplinary action was made. The petition alleges documentation produced during the adjudication process are \u201cincomplete, in many ways inaccurate and make assertions out of context\u201d because the adjudication process didn\u2019t allow cross-examination or grant Dannenmaier the opportunity to interview witnesses, according to the petition. Dannenmaier\u2019s informal management style \u201cwas not well received by some of his colleagues in the law school\u201d and his decision to hire the two former employees who made the complaints \u201cwas also criticized by some,\u201d according to the petition. The petition also alleges texts shared between Dannenmaier and the two former employees show \u201ca strong productive relationship,\u201d a lack of complaints signed \u201ctangible or electronic complaint\u201d against Dannenmaier and a lack of complaints made directly to Dannenmaier about a hostile working environment, according to the petition. Dannenmaier went on paid administrative leave Feb. 15 after the complaints of sexual harassment were made Title investigation concluded April 14 that stated that it was \u201cmore likely than not\u201d that Dannenmaier had created a hostile working environment \u201cby using comments and language of a sexual nature in the workplace,\u201d according to memoranda sent from Sarah Adamski, associate director of Investigations Affirmative Action and Equity \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f director of Investigations, Affirmative Action and Equity Compliance, to the former employees April 15. Dannenmaier appealed the findings April 28. Anne Kaplan, vice president for Outreach, Engagement and Regional Development, concurred with the investigation\u2019s findings in her June 9 appeal decision to Dannenmaier. \u201cThe issue here is not whether Dean Dannenmaier\u2019s comments were sexual, overly intrusive and inappropriate \u2014 many were \u2014 but whether he knew or had reason to know that they were unwelcome,\u201d Kaplan wrote in the appeal decision.\u201d\u2026It is the dean who is [the] senior party in this situation and the Dean who represents or should represent the values of the university.\u201d Dannenmaier submitted his resignation letter June 27. Both parties are expected to appear before Waller 1:30 p.m. Sept. 1 at the DeKalb County Courthouse,133 W. State St., in Sycamore for the hearing. Correction: This article previously read hearing for a lawsuit in which is being sued for a temporary restraining order by the former College of Law dean is scheduled for Sept. 1.\u201d The Northern Star would like to correct that the former College of Law dean took legal action against through a temporary restraining order but is not suing the university. The article and headline have been changed to reflect that correction. Northern Star The Northern Star is the student-produced, independent media at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, Illinois, and is a limited public forum whose content is determined exclusively by its student editors. Information presented Our Coverage News Campus City Sports Lifestyle About Us Staff Apply to the Northern Contact Us Submit a News Tip Submit a Letter to the Get Our Newsletters Yo r email address Daily Headlines Daily Recap Alumni Recap \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f \u00a9 2025 \u00a9 Copyright 2025 Northern Star - All Rights Reserved Pro WordPress Theme by \u2022 Log in on this website and in its print products is not controlled by administration, faculty or staff. The Star publishes online at northernstar.info and sends out its newsletter Mondays through Fridays while class is in session during fall and spring semesters. Your email address ... Sign Up \uf164 \uf39e \uf0e0 \uf02f", "7467_108.pdf": "Shutterstock Home / Daily News / Why are law deans not fired after investigations Why are law deans not fired after investigations find misconduct with women (HTTPS://WWW.ABAJOURNAL.COM/AUTHORS/20 19, 2018, 8:30 Tweet Email Print Of the three law school deans who recently stepped down after sex harassment allegations\u2014two of whom who received sexual harassment findings, while another dean\u2019s conduct was found to be bullying\u2014none lost their jobs immediately, despite criticism from students and alumni. The reason for that is twofold, says Saundra Schuster, an attorney at the Group in Pennsylvania who does risk management work with universities. It\u2019s easier and cheaper to pay these deans for a year than defend the lawsuits they\u2019d likely file if they were fired, she explains, and most Share Like 0 Share 2/22/25, 8:49 Why are law deans not fired after investigations find misconduct with women? 1/4 academic-track administrators have tenure as part of their employment contracts. Firing someone with tenure is almost impossible, Schuster says. Others say there\u2019s a culture at law schools where even if everyone knows a professor sexually harrasses students, little if anything is done to stop it. Despite the public\u2019s growing disapproval of sexual harassment and the negative press universities receive when their law school deans are accused of the misconduct, Schuster says that it\u2019s unlikely schools with tenure will add evidence of sexual harassment as a deal-breaker for the agreements. \u201cBeing a tenured faculty member is so ingrained in the hearts of faculty, particularly at high-level universities that would have law schools,\u201d she says. Northern Kentucky University\u2019s Jeffrey Standen ( is the most recent law school dean to step down after sexual harassment allegations made by three female employees, two of whom were students. The school\u2019s provost found that there wasn\u2019t enough evidence to make a sexual misconduct finding, but she did find sufficient evidence to support a finding of fear, intimidation and bullying. Standen accepted a full-time teaching position with the school, which starts in the fall. In a letter to the Cincinnati Enquirer ( kentucky-chase-law-dean-responds-allegations-misconduct/370350002/), Standen denied the allegations that he looked down an employee\u2019s dress, adjusted his crotch in front of people and stared at women shelving books in his office have always treated women with the utmost respect, and always will. It pains me deeply that these co-workers felt disrespected in any way,\u201d Standen wrote in the letter. The letter did not address allegations that he repeatedly asked for hugs, and made female students pick up pencils or other objects he dropped. Sujit Choudhry, the former law school dean of University of California at Berkeley, stepped down in March 2016 ( after Tyann Sorrell, an executive assistant, filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him and the university 2015 school investigation found that he repeatedly kissed the employee on the cheek, which violated university policy and showed a lack of judgment. In April 2016 ( he filed a grievance with the school\u2019s privilege and tenure committee, arguing that administrators launched a second investigation, with the goal of taking his tenure. Choudhry claimed that colleagues, not administrators, have the authority to determine whether he violated the university\u2019s faculty code of conduct. The parties reached a settlement agreement, which allows Choudhry to be on unpaid sabbatical leave from May 31, 2017, to May 31, 2018, a school spokesperson told the Journal. 2/22/25, 8:49 Why are law deans not fired after investigations find misconduct with women? 2/4 Like Standen, Choudhry wrote to a newspaper about his experience.The writing started with an acknowledgement that some students expressed concern that he was still on campus, and asserted that when the executive assistant told him in an email that she was uncomfortable with his conduct, he immediately stopped the behavior in question. \u201cLet\u2019s be clear: Sexual violence of all forms is horrendous and never, ever acceptable share and agree with your instinctive reaction to protect and support victims of sexual predation everywhere. Let\u2019s also be clear on this acted with no sexual intent toward Ms. Sorrell am not a predator and have never been accused of being one until now,\u201d Choudhry wrote in a September 2016 opinion piece that appeared in the Daily Californian ( Eric Dannenmaier, the former dean of Northern Illinois University College of Law, resigned from the position in June, after a Title investigation that found it was more likely than not he sexually harassed employees. According to the investigation memo ( chronicle.com/lists/2017/07/12/5c1b6724aede43b1aba3205170f9ca9f/index.xml?page=2), which was posted by the Daily Chronicle, he asked an employee if she had \u201cengaged in sexual experimentation with females,\u201d suggested that he was \u201cgood with [his] mouth\u201d in a sexual way and asked her how often she had sex. The university entered a resolution agreement with Dannenmaier in July ( agreeing to pay him $95,000, and allowing him to have an off-campus research assignment at the university until Dec. 31 will likely never understand how they could interpret any of my words or actions as creating a hostile work environment or what motivated the complaint months after the communications alleged,\u201d Dannenmaier wrote in his resignation letter ( Law school deans are under a significant amount of stress, and there\u2019s often a distrust among faculty about school sexual harassment investigations, says Raymond D. Cotton, a partner at Nelson Mullins in Washington, D.C., who represents college administrators. Tenure was created because academia had a desire to protect professors\u2019 free speech rights, Cotton says. Schuster says that it\u2019s impossible to remove someone with tenure unless the person is engaged in \u201cegregious behavior.\u201d Cotton says: \u201cThe higher you go in academics, the more stress you are under. People under stress will crack at some point, and we have to recognize that, and provide help.\u201d Being sexually harassed is also extremely stressful, says Robin Runge, an adjunct professor at George Washington University Law School. She says tenure protections aren\u2019t the problem: It\u2019s that many students who experience sexual harassment don\u2019t report it because they fear retaliation and want to practice law in an area where the person harassing them is respected. Even when the incidents are reported and investigated by schools, Runge says, that rarely leads to any action being taken. 2/22/25, 8:49 Why are law deans not fired after investigations find misconduct with women? 3/4 Copyright 2025 American Bar Association. All rights reserved. Saundra Schuster am surprised that any of the law professors were held accountable by either being fired or forced to resign,\u201d she adds. Many academics talk to each other about people who make sexual harassment allegations on campus, and the discussion is frequently negative, says Jennifer Drobac, a law professor at the University of Indiana\u2019s Robert H. McKinney School of Law who studies sex harassment and has written a legal textbook on the subject. \u201cThe problem is that most universities don\u2019t have the guts to terminate these people, typically men, who are engaging in this behavior,\u201d Drobac says. \u201cThey will often rotate them out of administration and back onto the faculty.\u201d She also questions the notion that tenure always protects academics when it\u2019s been found that they likely engaged in sexual harassment think universities can withdraw jobs, even with tenured professors, because tenure does not give license to a violation of the law. If you break the law, you can lose your job, even if you are a tenured professor,\u201d she says would encourage universities to understand that when a professor or a dean violates the law, the university is completely within its rights to terminate the employment of that person.\u201d Corrects name of school in fifth graf at 8:36 a.m.; Schuster\u2019s name corrected in caption at 10:50 a.m. Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error. 2/22/25, 8:49 Why are law deans not fired after investigations find misconduct with women? 4/4"} |
8,427 | Amita Sinha | University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign | [
"8427_101.pdf",
"8427_102.pdf"
] | {"8427_101.pdf": "This article was produced in partnership with Illinois, which is a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network. ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they\u2019re published. Since last year, allegations of harassment and sexual misconduct have surfaced against three professors and an administrator at the University of Illinois\u2019 flagship campus in Urbana-Champaign. In each instance, the public wasn\u2019t told by the university until news organizations or others brought the allegations to light One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. We found several sexual harassment allegations against University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign faculty that haven\u2019t been publicly reported. Here\u2019s a rundown of the accusations, the consequences each faced and their responses. by Rachel Otwell Illinois, and Alex Mierjeski, ProPublica, Aug. 27, 2019, 6 a.m view of the College of Law building at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, including construction tape. (Pat Nabong for ProPublica) 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 1/8 review of public records by Illinois and ProPublica revealed three additional, previously unreported cases in which professors facing similar allegations were allowed to quietly resign or remain on the payroll in lieu of being fired. Some of the employees accumulated multiple complaints over a period of years. Here\u2019s a breakdown of the cases reviewed: Professor: Valarmathi Thiruvanamalai Department: Comparative Biosciences Allegations: Three women told the university\u2019s investigative arm, then called the Office of Diversity, Equity and Access, or ODEA, that Thiruvanamalai had sexually harassed them. The allegations against him in 2014 ranged from lewd comments to efforts to create situations in which he would be alone with individual students. The unwanted behavior included calls, texts, inquiries about bathroom breaks and menstrual cycles, an invitation to a student to stay in the same hotel room, and unannounced visits to their homes. Result did not complete a full investigation or make conclusions about an initial complaint from one student. Instead, in an \u201cinformal resolution\u201d in November 2014, Thiruvanamalai was directed not to contact the complainant, who was moved to a different lab. After a complaint by a second student as well as a lab tech, an investigation found that Thiruvanamalai violated the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy and he agreed to resign in 2015. Professor response: Thiruvanamalai \u201cvehemently refuted the allegations,\u201d according to the informal resolution from 2014. He also denied subsequent claims but conceded he used terms like \u201csweetie\u201d or \u201csweetheart\u201d as terms of endearment. He did not respond to repeated calls and emails from Illinois requesting comment. Resignation terms: Thiruvanamalai signed a separation agreement in November 2015. The agreement did not mention the claims against him or the investigation\u2019s findings. It contained a confidentiality clause, barring both him and the university from discussing the details of his departure. Thiruvanamalai was put on paid administrative leave until his contract expired in August 2016 at his annual salary of about $98,600 plus benefits. Where he is now: According to documents obtained by Illinois and ProPublica, he began working at the University of Alabama at Birmingham in September 2017 said his last day was June 10, 2019 \u2014 one month after Illinois and ProPublica requested documents from the 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 2/8 university, including any background checks it performed before employing him, and any complaints about him. How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Amita Sinha Department: Landscape Architecture Allegations: Sinha was accused of engaging in unwanted behavior toward a male colleague \u201cintermittently for 15 years.\u201d Sinha failed to comply with numerous directives to stop contacting the male colleague, whom she caused \u201csignificant emotional distress,\u201d according to the claims. Result: The university found that Sinha violated the stalking provision of the sexual misconduct policy. It suggested that her department \u201ctake appropriate employment action\u201d and that department leadership undergo training on what constitutes sexual harassment. Her department head told the university he would pursue \u201cappropriate employment action\u201d if she did not resign. Resignation terms: Sinha agreed to retire in October 2017 and her departure went into effect 10 months later. Until then, Sinha was placed on administrative leave, during which she was paid at her annual salary rate of about $101,700 plus health care benefits. The separation agreement contained a confidentiality clause and also a provision barring Sinha from speaking poorly of the university. Professor response: Lawyers for Sinha disputed the report\u2019s findings, saying most of her interactions with the colleague in question were professional. Her current lawyer said that she applied for and received a Fulbright grant while still a faculty member at UIUC. Where she is now: She was a Fulbright scholar who taught in India starting in July 2018 through April 2019. Her host institution was listed as UIUC. How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Mahir Saul Department: Anthropology Allegations: In 2016, a student accused Saul of inappropriate touching and comments on her looks and repeated requests for one-on-one outings. The university spoke with two additional \u201cindividuals\u201d who had similar concerns about Saul\u2019s behavior but who didn\u2019t wish to file formal complaints. 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 3/8 In 2018, a research assistant complained that Saul pressured her to stay at his apartment and sleep in his bed while they were in Turkey conducting research. She said another student had told her that she had acquiesced and slept in his bed, but that they did not have sex. Result: In 2016 concluded that while Saul\u2019s actions didn\u2019t violate the sexual misconduct policy, supervisors should instruct him on appropriate student-professor interactions outside the classroom. It also recommended sexual harassment and Title training. Two years later, the office again found that Saul did not violate the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy, but this time that he violated its code of conduct. The office advised that he should not meet one-on-one with junior female staff or students in \u201cuniversity spaces.\u201d The Anthropology Department head took the university\u2019s recommendations further by taking Saul out of the classroom entirely. He has been on paid administrative leave since November of last year. His annual salary is around $91,000. Professor response: Saul has denied wrongdoing in both the investigative documents and in correspondence with Illinois. He said that the claims were inaccurate and that the 2018 investigation was the result of a \u201clabor dispute \u2026 with a disgruntled employee.\u201d Where he is now: Employed by the university How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Joseph Petry Department: Economics Allegations: In an April 2019 Reddit post, a student accused Petry of offering her good grades for sex. ProPublica and Illinois obtained complaint intake forms from October 2018 and April 2019 against him that were almost entirely redacted. Result: Petry was put on paid administrative leave beginning in February pending an investigation. Students were initially told that Petry was on leave because of a \u201cfamily emergency,\u201d according to a report in the Champaign-area newspaper The News-Gazette. Resignation terms: The university put Petry on paid leave until May 2019 at his annual salary rate of $96,300. Petry signed a separation agreement on April 11. One term of the agreement was that the university \u201cwill discontinue its investigation into the allegations that have been brought 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 4/8 against Mr. Petry and no formal discipline will be imposed.\u201d However, the university told Illinois the investigation was continuing. The agreement did not include a confidentiality clause. Professor response: According to media reports, Petry admitted sharing photos and \u201ccommunications of a social nature\u201d with a student, but he denied other claims. In a statement provided through his lawyers, he said that, had an investigation continued, he is confident it would not have found him in violation of university policy. Where he is now: Unclear How this came to light: Reddit initially, and subsequently reported by local and national media. Professor: Gary Xu Department: East Asian Languages and Cultures Allegations: Public records obtained by Illinois and ProPublica detail allegations against Xu stretching back to 2014, and they include various claims of sexual harassment as well as assault. In one case, a student who said she was in an abusive relationship with Xu petitioned a court for a protective order. Result: The university concluded, according to heavily redacted investigative findings, that Xu\u2019s relationship with a student violated the student code, and that he violated directives from the dean not to contact a victim who came forward. Resignation terms: Xu had been on paid administrative leave since January 2016 pending the outcome of the university\u2019s investigation. He signed a separation agreement in June 2017 that allowed him to remain on paid leave through August 2018, when his resignation took effect. The agreement stated he would earn his salary of about $85,400 during that time. The resignation also came with a $10,000 lump-sum payment from the university. His separation agreement included terms that he keep the details confidential and not disparage the university. Professor response: Xu had denied claims in reporting by The Daily Illini, the university\u2019s student newspaper. He did not respond to requests for comment from ProPublica. Where he is now: Unclear How this came to light: Chinese media reports followed by Daily Illini reports. 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 5/8 Administrator: Lee Waldrep Department: Architecture (He was an instructor and also an administrator for undergrad student services.) Allegations: In March and April 2017, eight female students complained to the university that Waldrep made inappropriate comments and engaged in uncomfortable physical behavior, including that he \u201cblocked their path on a stairwell, backed them into a railing or wall, pinned their legs between his while sitting across from them or stood uncomfortably close to them.\u201d Result: An August 2017 report by found that he had violated both the sexual misconduct policy as well as the code of conduct. Waldrep had already resigned by the time the investigation was completed, but suggested he never be rehired by the university. Resignation terms: Waldrep was on paid leave from April to August 2017 at his annual salary of about $92,700. He resigned before the investigation was completed, and when it did come out in the following weeks, it was labeled \u201cconfidential.\u201d The resignation included terms that he could not speak of the agreement or disparage the university, and that any violations would come with a $10,000 fee. Administrator response: According to the report, he denied the allegations. He declined Illinois\u2019 request for comment through a lawyer. Where he is now: Waldrep began working at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, in March 2018. He was fired later that year after details about his resignation from came to light through media reports. How this came to light: The investigation was reported by The News- Gazette and the local public media station, and it was subsequently covered by the Knoxville News Sentinel in Tennessee. Professor: Jay Kesan Department: College of Law Allegations student told law school officials in 2002 that Kesan sexually harassed her. The then-dean of the College of Law wrote a letter to Kesan in which she mentioned additional rumors about Kesan engaging in problematic behavior. No investigation took place at that time, according to records. In 2015, three anonymous complainants said that Kesan had inquired about their views on sex while sharing details of his own sex life, and that he had inappropriately touched or tried to touch them. 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 6/8 Result: Following the 2015 complaints found in 2017 that Kesan didn\u2019t violate the sexual misconduct code, \u201cas defined by University policy,\u201d however, \u201chis actions certainly have made the working and teaching environment uncomfortable for a countless number of female colleagues and students suggested that the College of Law better publicize information on how to file sexual harassment claims, and that Kesan undergo professional coaching and training, among several other suggestions. In 2017, the dean of the College of Law agreed to have Kesan undergo in- person sexual harassment training and noted he would not qualify for certain salary programs and lucrative endowment positions for a limited period of time. Professor response: Kesan told the that the allegations lacked merit, but he later authored a letter admitting the conduct happened as described. He told Illinois he had no further comment on the claims but credited the #MeToo movement with improving public discourse about sexual harassment. He said he plans to return to work in 2020. Where he is now: Still employed with university and on voluntary unpaid leave until 2020. How this came to light #MeToo forum in 2018 and subsequent media reports. Rachel Otwell is a reporter at Illinois Illinois was part of the Illinois Newsroom collaborative, which secured the initial grant for this project Illinois and Illinois Public Media are part of the University of Illinois System. The university has no editorial control or oversight of news content produced by either. Reporters at Illinois, however, are considered \u201cresponsible employees\u201d under the university\u2019s policies and are required to report allegations of abuse to the university. As a result, news tips should be sent to ProPublica staff. Our reporting won\u2019t stop here. Have you faced sexual harassment or violence from a faculty or staff member at a university, college or community college in Illinois? We need your help \u2014 here\u2019s how you can get in touch: Fill out our questionnaire Send us an email at [email protected] Call or text us at 347-244-2134. You can also reach that number via Signal or WhatsApp, which is more secure. Check out this page with more information on ways to send us documents and other materials. Update, Oct. 10, 2019: This story has been updated to reflect that the callout is being done solely by ProPublica and not in partnership with Illinois. For more 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 7/8 information, read this Closer Look column. Filed under: Education, Sex and Gender Alex Mierjeski I\u2019m a research reporter at ProPublica based in New York. [email protected] @Amierjeski Signal: AMierjeski.01 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. \u2014 ProPublica 8/8", "8427_102.pdf": "News Local/State One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. August 27, 2019 By Rachel Otwell Illinois, and Alex Mierjeski, ProPublica Donate Now 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 1/12 view of the College of Law building at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, including construction tape. Pat Nabong, special to ProPublica This article was produced in partnership with Illinois, which is a member of the ProPublica Local Reporting Network. Since last year, allegations of harassment and sexual misconduct have surfaced against three professors and an administrator at the University of Illinois\u2019 flagship campus in Urbana-Champaign. In each instance, the public wasn\u2019t told by the university until news organizations or others brought the allegations to light review of public records by Illinois and ProPublica revealed three additional, previously unreported cases in which professors facing similar allegations were allowed to quietly resign or remain on the payroll in lieu of being fired. Some of the employees accumulated multiple complaints over a period of years. Here\u2019s a breakdown of the cases reviewed: Professor: Valarmathi Thiruvanamalai Department: Comparative Biosciences Allegations: Three women told the university\u2019s investigative arm, then called the Office of Diversity, Equity and Access, or ODEA, that Thiruvanamalai had sexually harassed them. The allegations against him in 2014 ranged from lewd comments to efforts to create situations in which he would be alone with individual students. The unwanted behavior included calls, texts, inquiries about bathroom breaks and menstrual cycles, an invitation to a student to stay in the same hotel room, and unannounced visits to their homes. Result did not complete a full investigation or make conclusions about an initial complaint from one student. Instead, in an \u201cinformal resolution\u201d in November 2014, Thiruvanamalai was directed not to contact the complainant, who was moved to a different lab. After a complaint by a second student as well as a lab tech, an investigation found that Thiruvanamalai violated the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy and he agreed to resign in 2015. Professor response: Thiruvanamalai \u201cvehemently refuted the allegations,\u201d according to the informal resolution from 2014. He also denied subsequent 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 2/12 claims but conceded he used terms like \u201csweetie\u201d or \u201csweetheart\u201d as terms of endearment. He did not respond to repeated calls and emails from Illinois requesting comment. Resignation terms: Thiruvanamalai signed a separation agreement in November 2015. The agreement did not mention the claims against him or the investigation\u2019s findings. It contained a confidentiality clause, barring both him and the university from discussing the details of his departure. Thiruvanamalai was put on paid administrative leave until his contract expired in August 2016 at his annual salary of about $98,600 plus benefits. Where he is now: According to documents obtained by Illinois and ProPublica, he began working at the University of Alabama at Birmingham in September 2017 said his last day was June 10, 2019 \u2014 one month after Illinois and ProPublica requested documents from the university, including any background checks it performed before employing him, and any complaints about him. How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Amita Sinha Department: Landscape Architecture Allegations: Sinha was accused of engaging in unwanted behavior toward a male colleague \u201cintermittently for 15 years.\u201d Sinha failed to comply with numerous directives to stop contacting the male colleague, whom she caused \u201csignificant emotional distress,\u201d according to the claims. Result: The university found that Sinha violated the stalking provision of the sexual misconduct policy. It suggested that her department \u201ctake appropriate employment action\u201d and that department leadership undergo training on what constitutes sexual harassment. Her department head told the university he would pursue \u201cappropriate employment action\u201d if she did not resign. Resignation terms: Sinha agreed to retire in October 2017 and her departure went into effect 10 months later. Until then, Sinha was placed on administrative leave, during which she was paid at her annual salary rate of about $101,700 plus health care benefits. The separation agreement contained a confidentiality clause and also a provision barring Sinha from speaking poorly of the university. 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 3/12 Professor response: Lawyers for Sinha disputed the report\u2019s findings, saying most of her interactions with the colleague in question were professional. Her current lawyer said that she applied for and received a Fulbright grant while still a faculty member at UIUC. Where she is now: She was a Fulbright scholar who taught in India starting in July 2018 through April 2019. Her host institution was listed as UIUC. How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Mahir Saul Department: Anthropology Allegations: In 2016, a student accused Saul of inappropriate touching and comments on her looks and repeated requests for one-on-one outings. The university spoke with two additional \u201cindividuals\u201d who had similar concerns about Saul\u2019s behavior but who didn\u2019t wish to file formal complaints. In 2018, a research assistant complained that Saul pressured her to stay at his apartment and sleep in his bed while they were in Turkey conducting research. She said another student had told her that she had acquiesced and slept in his bed, but that they did not have sex. Result: In 2016 concluded that while Saul\u2019s actions didn\u2019t violate the sexual misconduct policy, supervisors should instruct him on appropriate student-professor interactions outside the classroom. It also recommended sexual harassment and Title training. Two years later, the office again found that Saul did not violate the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy, but this time that he violated its code of conduct. The office advised that he should not meet one-on-one with junior female staff or students in \u201cuniversity spaces.\u201d The Anthropology Department head took the university\u2019s recommendations further by taking Saul out of the classroom entirely. He has been on paid administrative leave since November of last year. His annual salary is around $91,000. Professor response: Saul has denied wrongdoing in both the investigative documents and in correspondence with Illinois. He said that the claims were inaccurate and that the 2018 investigation was the result of a \u201clabor dispute \u2026 with a disgruntled employee.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 4/12 Where he is now: Employed by the university How this came to light Illinois/ProPublica investigation Professor: Joseph Petry Department: Economics Allegations: In an April 2019 Reddit post, a student accused Petry of offering her good grades for sex. ProPublica and Illinois obtained complaint intake forms from October 2018 and April 2019 against him that were almost entirely redacted. Result: Petry was put on paid administrative leave beginning in February pending an investigation. Students were initially told that Petry was on leave because of a \u201cfamily emergency,\u201d according to a report in the Champaign- area newspaper The News-Gazette. Resignation terms: The university put Petry on paid leave until May 2019 at his annual salary rate of $96,300. Petry signed a separation agreement on April 11. One term of the agreement was that the university \u201cwill discontinue its investigation into the allegations that have been brought against Mr. Petry and no formal discipline will be imposed.\u201d However, the university told Illinois the investigation was continuing. The agreement did not include a confidentiality clause. Professor response: According to media reports, Petry admitted sharing photos and \u201ccommunications of a social nature\u201d with a student, but he denied other claims. In a statement provided through his lawyers, he said that, had an investigation continued, he is confident it would not have found him in violation of university policy. Where he is now: Unclear How this came to light: Reddit initially, and subsequently reported by local and national media. Professor: Gary Xu Department: East Asian Languages and Cultures Allegations: Public records obtained by Illinois and ProPublica detail allegations against Xu stretching back to 2014, and they include various claims of sexual harassment as well as assault. In one case, a student who 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 5/12 said she was in an abusive relationship with Xu petitioned a court for a protective order. Result: The university concluded, according to heavily redacted investigative findings, that Xu\u2019s relationship with a student violated the student code, and that he violated directives from the dean not to contact a victim who came forward. Resignation terms: Xu had been on paid administrative leave since January 2016 pending the outcome of the university\u2019s investigation. He signed a separation agreement in June 2017 that allowed him to remain on paid leave through August 2018, when his resignation took effect. The agreement stated he would earn his salary of about $85,400 during that time. The resignation also came with a $10,000 lump-sum payment from the university. His separation agreement included terms that he keep the details confidential and not disparage the university. Professor response: Xu had denied claims in reporting by The Daily Illini, the university\u2019s student newspaper. He did not respond to requests for comment from ProPublica. Where he is now: Unclear How this came to light: Chinese media reports followed by Daily Illini reports. Administrator: Lee Waldrep Department: Architecture (He was an instructor and also an administrator for undergrad student services.) Allegations: In March and April 2017, eight female students complained to the university that Waldrep made inappropriate comments and engaged in uncomfortable physical behavior, including that he \u201cblocked their path on a stairwell, backed them into a railing or wall, pinned their legs between his while sitting across from them or stood uncomfortably close to them.\u201d Result: An August 2017 report by found that he had violated both the sexual misconduct policy as well as the code of conduct. Waldrep had already resigned by the time the investigation was completed, but suggested he never be rehired by the university. Resignation terms: Waldrep was on paid leave from April to August 2017 at his annual salary of about $92,700. He resigned before the investigation was 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 6/12 completed, and when it did come out in the following weeks, it was labeled \u201cconfidential.\u201d The resignation included terms that he could not speak of the agreement or disparage the university, and that any violations would come with a $10,000 fee. Administrator response: According to the report, he denied the allegations. He declined Illinois\u2019 request for comment through a lawyer. Where he is now: Waldrep began working at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, in March 2018. He was fired later that year after details about his resignation from came to light through media reports. How this came to light: The investigation was reported by The News-Gazette and Illinois Public Media, and it was subsequently covered by the Knoxville News Sentinel in Tennessee. Professor: Jay Kesan Department: College of Law Allegations student told law school officials in 2002 that Kesan sexually harassed her. The then-dean of the College of Law wrote a letter to Kesan in which she mentioned additional rumors about Kesan engaging in problematic behavior. No investigation took place at that time, according to records. In 2015, three anonymous complainants said that Kesan had inquired about their views on sex while sharing details of his own sex life, and that he had inappropriately touched or tried to touch them. Result: Following the 2015 complaints found in 2017 that Kesan didn\u2019t violate the sexual misconduct code, \u201cas defined by University policy,\u201d however, \u201chis actions certainly have made the working and teaching environment uncomfortable for a countless number of female colleagues and students suggested that the College of Law better publicize information on how to file sexual harassment claims, and that Kesan undergo professional coaching and training, among several other suggestions. In 2017, the dean of the College of Law agreed to have Kesan undergo in- person sexual harassment training and noted he would not qualify for certain salary programs and lucrative endowment positions for a limited period of time. 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 7/12 Professor response: Kesan told the that the allegations lacked merit, but he later authored a letter admitting the conduct happened as described. He told Illinois he had no further comment on the claims but credited the #MeToo movement with improving public discourse about sexual harassment. He said he plans to return to work in 2020. Where he is now: Still employed with university and on voluntary unpaid leave until 2020. How this came to light #MeToo forum in 2018 and subsequent media reports. Rachel Otwell is a reporter at Illinois. Email her at [email protected] follow her on Twitter at @MsOtwell Illinois and Illinois Public Media are part of the University of Illinois system. The university has no editorial control or oversight of news content produced by either Illinois was part of the Illinois Newsroom collaborative, which secured the initial grant for this project Illinois and ProPublica have teamed up to investigate sexual misconduct at institutions of higher education in Illinois. Our reporting won\u2019t stop here. Have you faced sexual harassment or violence from a faculty or staff member at a university, college or community college in Illinois? We need your help \u2014 here\u2019s how you can get in touch. Fill out our questionnaire Send us an email at [email protected] Call or text us at 347-244-2134. You can also reach that number via Signal or WhatsApp, which is more secure. Check out this page with more information on ways to send us documents and other materials. Links At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Preserving the Reputations of Sexual Harassers Researcher: Sexual Harassment Just The \u2018Tip Of The Iceberg\u2019 Lawsuit: Racial Harassment Is \u2018Standard Operating Procedure\u2019 At Of Ex Administrator Fired From University Of Tennessee After Sexual Harassment Case Made Public 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 8/12 Documents Show Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Jay Kesan Date Back To 2002 Of Law School Dean Apologizes For Sexual Harassment Case Involving Professor Jay Kesan Of Law Professor: Power Dynamics Make Academia \u2018Ripe For Abuse\u2019 sexual harassment metoo metoostem university of illinois Illinois Public Media Campbell Hall 300 N. Goodwin Urbana 61801 217-333-7300 [email protected] Location & Map College of Media Newsletters facebookinstagramyoutube 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 9/12 Subscribe to our newsletters to get updates about Illinois Public Media's role in giving voice to local arts, education, new ideas, and community needs, sent straight to your inbox. Support Donate Membership Information Travel & Tours Friends of Memory Archive About Compliance Documentation Public Files Management Privacy Notice Accessibility at Illinois Admissions 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 10/12 Alumni Athletics Bookstore Calendar Campus Directory Campus Map COVID-19 Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Emergency Employment Giving Mental Health News Office of the Chancellor Office of the Provost Research Student Assistance Center University of Illinois System Privacy Policy Accessibility About Cookies 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 11/12 \u00a9 2025 University of Illinois 2/22/25, 8:53 One Campus. Seven Professors Facing Harassment Accusations. Few Consequences. | News Local/State | Illinois Public Media 12/12"} |
9,068 | William VerMeulen | Rice University | [
"9068_101.pdf",
"9068_102.pdf",
"9068_103.pdf",
"9068_104.pdf",
"9068_105.pdf"
] | {"9068_101.pdf": "(/) Listen Watch Donate(/donate) ( Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students The allegations involve claims from several former students who accuse William VerMeulen of engaging in inappropriate behav during his tenure as a professor of horn at Rice\u2019s Shepherd School of Music. Lucio Vasquez (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Articles/Author/Lucio-Vasquez/) | May 29, 2024, 1:24 (Last Updated: May 29, 2024, 2:13 PM) search 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 1/6 Education (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/Education/) Education News (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/News/Education-News/) William VerMeulen is accused of engaging in inappropriate behavior with female students during his tenure as a professor of horn at Rice University\u2019s Shepherd of Music professor in Rice University's music school has retired amid online allegations of inappropriate conduct with students. The allegations ( involve claims from several former students who accuse William VerMeulen of engaging in inappropriate behavior during his tenure as a professo at Rice\u2019s Shepherd School of Music. There are also allegations of sexually explicit photos being sent to students. In a statement to Houston Public Media, Rice officials said they were \u201caware of the private images\u201d and were \u201cprepared to investigate any reports misconduct.\u201d \u201cAs we review any new information, we will maintain the privacy of all involved,\u201d the statement read. \u201cRice does not tolerate sexual harassment or misconduct by any member of the Rice community.\u201d As of Wednesday afternoon, VerMeulen\u2019s page ( on the school\u2019s website was not active. VerMeul not responded to multiple requests for comment. VerMeulen, 59, has been a fixture in the music world for decades. He\u2019s been a faculty member at the Shepherd School of Music for decades and h principal horn of the Houston Symphony since 1990. However, according to a classical music professor who requested anonymity, VerMeulen\u2019s re has apparently been intertwined with long-running stories of alleged inappropriate behavior with female students. \u201cPeople were saying that he would use extremely sexual language with women students and would aggressively use sexual metaphors and things that,\u201d the professor said. The unnamed professor says these stories have circulated for years, although they believe the classical music community has remained silent out retaliation. \u201cPeople are really, really afraid to talk about it because he\u2019s still well known,\u201d the professor said. \u201cEven if he is retiring, he has former students in professional orchestra horn sections all over the world and it just seems like people have a lot to lose with it being such a small community.\u201d Amid the allegations, VerMeulen was reportedly suspended ( from his post at t Houston Symphony spokesperson for the Symphony told Houston Public Media that they were reviewing the allegations and will \u201ctake any acti ensure they\u2019re \u201cproviding a safe environment.\u201d Courtesy of Rice University Police Department / Housto 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 2/6 Houston (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/News/Houston/) Local (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/News/Local/) Music (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/Arts-Culture/Music/) News (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Topics/News/) Classical Music (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/Classical-Music/) Houston Symphony (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/Houston-Symphony/ Inappropriate Behavior (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/Inappropriate-Behavior/) Rice (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/Rice/) Shepherd School Of Music (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/Shepherd-School-Of-Music/) William VerMeulen (Https://Www.Houstonpublicmedia.Org/Tag/William-Vermeulen/) Support Comes From Oscar nominee and \u2018Wicked\u2019 star Cynthia Erivo to perform with Houston Symphony ( culture-news/2025/01/24/511929/2025-oscar-nominee- and-wicked-star-cynthia-erivo-to-perform-with-the- houston-symphony/) Not all classical music was composed by white European men centuries ago. ( matters/2025/01/16/511027/not-all-classical-music-was- composed-by-european-men/) Houston\u2019s legislative priorities (Jan. 16, 2025) ( matters/2025/01/16/510738/houstons-legislative-priorities-jan- 16-2025/) Drama in city government (Oct. 24, 2024) ( matters/2024/10/24/503670/drama-in-city-government-oct-24- 2024/) Nearly a quarter of Houston students were absent on nationwide \u2018Day Without Immigrants\u2019 (/articles/news/education- news/hisd/2025/02/19/514244/a-quarter-of-houston- isd-students-were-absent-as-day-without-immigrant was-held-nationwide employees accept deferred resignation offers as Houston- area workforce braces for possible cuts (/articles/news/nasa/2025/02/20/514148/nasa- employees-accept-deferred-resignation-offers-as- houston-area-workforce-braces-for-cuts reviewing claim that teachers at Houston ISD\u2019s Bellaire were \u2018socially transitioning\u2019 student (/articles/news/education- news/hisd/2025/02/17/514048/tea-reviewing- houston-isd-for-socially-transitioning-bellaire-hs- student-upon-gov-abbott-request/) Houston joining nationwide group of school districts in suing (/articles/news/education- news/hisd/2025/02/18/514103/houston-isd-joins- hundreds-of-others-nationwide-suing-social-media- companies 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 3/6 Resources like these are made possible by the generosity of our community of donors, foundations, and corporate partners. Join others and make your gift to Houston Public Media today (/donate) Sign up for our daily weekday newsletter - Hello, Houston (/hellohouston) Features Hello Houston ( Coronavirus News and Resources ( News 88.7 inDepth ( Storm Ready ( Topic Local News (/topics/news/houston/) Statewide News (/news/the-texas-newsroom/) Business ( Energy & Environment ( Health & Science ( science/) Immigration ( Art & Culture Arts & Culture ( Classical Music ( culture/classical-music/) Opera & Musical Theater ( culture/opera-musical-theater/) Awareness Black History Month ( Pride Month: Better Together! ( Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage ( social media companies Support Comes From Lucio Vasquez (mailto:[email protected]) 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 4/6 Dance ( Visual Art ( Voices and Verses Poem-A-Day Series ( day-series/) Black History ( Women\u2019s History ( Programs & podcasts Local Programs Party Politics ( ( Houston Matters with Craig Cohen ( 100 Years of Houston ( houston/) Bauer Business Focus ( business-focus/) Briefcase ( Engines of our Ingenuity ( Health Matters ( Moment ( Education Houston Public Media Kids (/education/kids Kids for Parents ( Learning Media ( Podcasts Below the Waterlines: Houston After Hurricane Harvey ( Party Politics ( Skyline Sessions ( Encore Houston ( Support Membership Update Payment Method ( campaign=15605107-AEB7-4016-898F-9287A03226E9&source=#/home) Upgrade your Monthly Gift ( campaign=15605107-AEB7-4016-898F-9287A03226E9&source=#/home) Give a Gift Membership ( membership) Giving Programs Affinity Council ( societies/affinity-council-members/) Giving Societies ( In Tempore Legacy Society (/support/giving-societies/in-tempore-legacy Innovation Fund (/support/innovation-fund/) Other Ways to Give (/support) Vehicle Donation ( Employee Match Program (/support/company-matching-gifts/) More Ways to Give (/support) Volunteers Foundation Board (/about/houston-public-media-foundation/) Young Leaders Council (/about/young-leaders-council/) Mission Ambassadors (/support/mission-ambassador/) Partnerships Corporate Partnership ( Community Catalyst ( catalyst Compliance ( Station Information ( Applications ( Public File ( Public File ( Ethics and Standards ( Privacy Policy ( Additional Disclosures ( About ( Careers ( Commitment ( commitment-to-the-city/index.php) Houston Public Media is supported with your gifts to the Houston Public Media Foundation and is licensed to the University of Houston ( \u00a9 2025 Houston Public Media 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 5/6 Texas.gov ( Texas Homeland Security ( ( Fraud Reporting ( Fraud & Non-Compliance Hotline ( Linking Notice ( Privacy Notice ( Open Records/Public Information Act ( Institutional R\u00e9sum\u00e9 ( Required Reports ( Electronic & Information Resources Accessibility ( Discrimination and Sexual Misconduct Reporting and Awareness ( University Policies ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 2/22/25, 8:53 Music professor retires from Rice following allegations of inappropriate conduct with female students \u2013 Houston Public Media 6/6", "9068_102.pdf": "Norman Lebrecht February 07, 2025 In May last year, Rice University in Texas fired horn professor William VerMeulen after allegations of sexual misconduct with female students, which he denied. VerMeulen was suspended for two months from playing in the Houston Symphony, where he is principal horn, but has since resumed his seat review today, by Lawrence Wheeler, shows why he is so valued: It is not unreasonable to assume that Eschenbach chose the Houston Symphony to perform and record this particular (Bruckner) symphony due to the artistry of principal French horn William VerMeulen. That choice was rewarded with stellar playing. From the opening solo, each phrase was thoughtfully shaped and expertly executed. It was a masterclass of great playing. The excellent French horn section joined him throughout, sounding especially impressive in the idiomatic third movement hunting scene. An 8,000-word article, initiated by a student newspaper, now reopens the allegations against VerMeulen. It contains several personal stories, going back three decades. You may read it here. \uf177 Previous post Next post \uf178 Share this article Home About Slippedisc Contact Login \uf002 2/22/25, 8:53 The long read: Fresh allegations against Houston horn - Slippedisc 1/3 Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:53 The long read: Fresh allegations against Houston horn - Slippedisc 2/3 \"We use cookies and other data collection technologies to provide the best experience for our customers. You may request that your data not be shared with third parties here: \"Do Not Sell My Data Norman Lebrecht February 20, 2025 Backstage, last night, the pianist took the plunge Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The West-East Diwan Orchestra has been rehearsing in Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 Herbert Fritsch\u2019s production of The Barber of Seville Norman Lebrecht February 21, 2025 The Orquesta de Extremadura, serving Spain\u2019s poorest region TODAY: + \uf39e \uf099 \uf0e1 Quick Links Home Contact Subscribe Login Cookies & Privacy Policy Terms of Use Contact [email protected] Home About Slippedisc Contact Login 2/22/25, 8:53 The long read: Fresh allegations against Houston horn - Slippedisc 3/3", "9068_103.pdf": "play_circle VIOLINIS\u2026 play_circle 2025 4 DAYS22 HRS34 expand_circle_right Th \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 1/10 (Image courtesy: William VerMeul \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 2/10 Rice University's Shepherd School of Music Dean has informed its st VerMeulen has retired, after the latter\u2019s \u201cprivate images\u201d app Rice University\u2019s Shepherd School of Music (SSM) has announced horn professor Will from its faculty, effective immediately. VerMeulen has taught at and served as the principal horn of the Houston Symphon Distinguished Teacher of America Certificate of Excellence from President Reagan and t Presidential Scholars. Recently, private x-rated, images of VerMeulen have been shared on social media. Additi behavior have also been shared on social media, specifically in the comments of oboist a Facebook page. An email that the Dean of SSM, Matthew Loden, sent to students was recently for In it, Loden says that despite Vermeulen's teaching record, \"there have recently been serio VerMeulen, which we will continue to address.\" \u201cRice is aware of private images that have recently resurfaced on social media,\" the emai allegations and is prepared to investigate any reports of misconduct. As we review any ne privacy of all involved. Rice does not tolerate sexual harassment or sexual misconduct by \u201cRice is also committed to fostering a positive and safe educational, working, and living staff, and visitors can thrive free from sexual harassment or misconduct of any kind, in co that prohibits discrimination based on sex in educational programs and activities. The email goes on to encourage people to report allegations of misconduct at The Violin Channel reached out to the Houston Symphony, and a representative said tha individual personnel matters, as a fundamental principle we evaluate any allegations of m determine are necessary and appropriate to ensure that we are providing a safe environme public \u201d They declined to comment on whether the horn player has been suspended from \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 3/10 public. They declined to comment on whether the horn player has been suspended from VerMeulen is no longer displayed on SSM\u2019s faculty page; the same is seen on Rochester and the Sun Valley Music Festival\u2019s faculty profiles. SHARE: \uf09a \uf099 \uf173 \uf0d2 Southwest Florida Symphony Appoints New Principal Conductor Applicati 2025 Jascha Heifetz Violin Competition February 16, 2025 Ric Grenell Appointed as Interim Executive Director of the Kenned February 12, 2025 New England Conservatory Presen Violinist Joshua Bro February 11, 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 4/10 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 5/10 Every Voice with Terrance McKnight \u2014 Episode 4 \"The Cellist Abel Selaocoe\u2019s New Album, \u201cHymns of Bantu February 21, 2025 Applications Open to 2025 Mirecourt International Violin February 21, 2025 Baritone Benjamin New Album, \u201cLines Life: Schubert and February 21, 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 6/10 Texas\u2019s Moores School of Music Appoints Affiliate Artist in Violin February 21, 2025 Paavo J\u00e4rvi Cancels Concerts with the Staatskapelle Berlin February 21, 2025 New Record Label Launches in Vienna February 21, 2025 14 22 15 18 19 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 7/10 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 8/10 The Violin Channel is the New York City-based leading international classical music news media and streaming \u201cThank you Violin Channel for creating such a wo platform in our industry Professor of Violin - New England Conservat \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 9/10 The Violin Channel is the New York City based leading international classical music news, media and streaming platform \u2014 with over 600,000+ social media and app devotees and an email subscription base of over 100,000 people, the platform consistently reaches in excess of 2,000,000 eyeballs worldwide each and every month. It comprehensively covers international classical music goings-on far beyond just the violin and strings, and includes up-to-date industry news, masterclasses, competition coverage, interviews, educational resources, events, and concert livestreams, with a heavy focus on the promotion of highly promising young string soloists and ensembles. \u00a92023 The Violin Channel, All Rights Reserved \uf658 2/22/25, 8:53 Horn Professor William VerMeulen Retires \u201cEffective Immediately\u201d Amidst Scandal 10/10", "9068_104.pdf": "\uf09a\uf099\uf0e0 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. Rice University\u2019s famed horn professor William VerMeulen abruptly retired last spring amid a swirl of sexual misconduct allegations. But dozens of students and industry insiders say \u201cthe administration has known for 30 years\u201d \u2014 and failed to act. Illustration by The Barbed Wire By Riya Misra 2/18/25 10:59pm This story has been published in collaboration with The Barbed Wire, a Texas-based digital news outlet. Read the story online at thebarbedwire.com and at ricethresher.org. This story contains descriptions of sexual trauma that may be triggering to some readers. Visit (Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network), which has a 24/7 hotline and helpful resources. The National Sexual Assault Hotline can also be reached at 800-656 (4673). Myrna Meeroff hadn\u2019t had a seizure in four years. But in 1995, on her first day of graduate classes at Rice University\u2019s Shepherd School of Music, she had one. Recovering in the hospital, she missed the beginning of the semester 1916 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 1/16 She entered the French horn studio a week behind her peers \u2014 \u201ccompromised in every way,\u201d she said. Meeroff\u2019s horn instructor, William VerMeulen, invited her to lunch off-campus in what seemed to Meeroff like a gesture of goodwill. VerMeulen gave her a lay of the land and caught Meeroff up on missed material. He reassured her about her absences and even offered to find her opportunities with community orchestras, she told the Thresher.. Everything would be alright, she remembered him saying. Then, she said, he placed his hand on her thigh. Why is this man touching me in any way? Meeroff remembered thinking. It gave her pause. Other teachers had touched her during lessons, placing their heads on top of hers to hear the horn\u2019s sound \u2014 weird, she said, though not sexual \u2014 but this was different. She forced herself to brush it off. Enjoy what you're reading? Sign up for our newsletter Email Address Sign up now The touching continued in lessons, Meeroff said, even as other male studio members watched. Though her previous teachers sat across from her as she played, VerMeulen sat next to her. He often touched her stomach, without permission, to ensure she was breathing deeply enough for her belly to expand. He\u2019d rest his hand on top of her thigh, she said, letting it stay for too long. \u201cWhen the hand is on your thigh?\u201d she told the Thresher. \u201cThat has nothing to do with music whatsoever.\u201d Meeroff had a sheltered childhood \u2014 \u201cthe music was my life,\u201d she said \u2014 and she sometimes wondered if VerMeulen\u2019s behavior was a figment of her imagination. She\u2019d been told he was one of the best teachers in the field. That he had the ability to make stars out of his students. \u201cThis was going to be the defining moment that was going to get me the career that wanted in music,\u201d she said. She wore pants to lessons, moved her chair, practiced at home in her apartment \u2014 quiet rebuffs to his repeated advances. \u201cOnce he realized that he wasn\u2019t going to get anything from me,\u201d Meeroff said, VerMeulen began \u201csystematically destroying my confidence.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 2/16 Illustration by The Barbed Wire Meeroff said he ranked her last in auditions. He gave her parts she felt he knew she couldn\u2019t do, then would \u201cberate me for not being able to do it to his satisfaction,\u201d she said. Beat down, she slowly stopped attending classes. Because she was afraid of losing her spot in the studio, Meeroff said she didn\u2019t report the behavior, or dare say the words \u201csexual harassment\u201d out loud. But she felt sure others knew. \u201cThey saw what was happening, and they couldn't help me without running the risk of, you know, having their career destroyed,\u201d she said. Meeroff often confided in a close friend, who trained at VerMeulen\u2019s studio from 1995 to 2000 know she was always fighting him off,\u201d he confirmed to the Thresher remember her telling me one day that Bill [VerMeulen] told her that if she tries to come back to Rice to finish her master\u2019s, he'll make her life a living hell remember her telling me that like it was yesterday few months into the fall semester, Meeroff said VerMeulen insisted the pair visit the school\u2019s counseling center. Meeroff wasn\u2019t homesick \u2014 she had easily spent months away from home at summer camps \u2014 but she said both VerMeulen and the counselor insisted otherwise. \u201cThey kept trying to convince me to go home, and stay home.\u201d \u201cPeople like that, they plant a seed and water it, and water it, and water it until it bears fruit. And you don't realize how much it's hurting you until you\u2019re completely destroyed,\u201d she said. Then, in their second-to-last lesson of the year, Meeroff said VerMeulen told her she\u2019d been kicked out of the studio. \u201cYou\u2019ve been replaced,\u201d are the words she remembered. \u201cAnd then he said, \u2018We're gonna sit down and talk about what you can do for a living, because you're never going to be a horn player.\u2019\u201d Meeroff didn\u2019t fight it. She left the Shepherd School of Music \u201ca shell of (her) former self.\u201d She went home at the end of the spring semester in 1996, back to Florida. She took a job at a music camp in upstate New York that summer to help clear her head. At the end of the season, the orchestra conductor told her she was the most accurate horn player he\u2019d ever heard. \u201cIt was a complete and total shock to me, because believed that my career was over,\u201d she said. She completed her master\u2019s at Florida Atlantic University and continued performing. In 2011, she founded the South Florida Chamber Ensemble, a music nonprofit that often partners with sexual abuse advocacy organizations. She took the group to Belgium for the 2019 International Horn Symposium. Meeroff knew VerMeulen would be there, and she wanted to see him. She needed closure. Then, climbing the stairs from the dressing room on her way to a concert, the two collided. \u201cHe didn't recognize me at all,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd that\u2019s when it dawned on me was like, \u2018Oh my gosh, he's done this to so many other people that he doesn't remember.\u2019\u201d 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 3/16 \u2018Everyone knew that Rice knew wave of #MeToo-esque reckonings rolled through the classical music world last year, prompted in part by a New York Magazine report published in April. The article detailed sexual assault and misconduct allegations against two members of the New York Philharmonic who were fired in 2018, then reinstated through union arbitration. The uproar was swift: The Philharmonic commissioned an outside investigation into the organizational culture. More women came forward with additional allegations against both players, who were placed on leave then fired in November. The players have denied the allegations and sued the Philharmonic and players union federal judge recently dismissed a $100 million lawsuit filed by one of the players against the magazine. Online discussion erupted in the insular industry. And more allegations emerged. Two musicians were removed from the Calgary Philharmonic. Indiana University\u2019s Jacobs School of Music announced it had removed one of its professors. Then, in May 2024, Rice announced then-63-year-old William VerMeulen\u2019s retirement, effective immediately. \u201cProfessor VerMeulen has been teaching at the Shepherd School since 1990, building one of the country\u2019s most prominent horn studios \u2014 with numerous professional placements for his students, who are performing in many of the top ensembles around the world,\u201d wrote Dean Matthew Loden in an email to music students and alumni, which the Thresher and The Barbed Wire independently reviewed. \u201cDespite his teaching record, there have recently been serious allegations made against Professor VerMeulen, which we will continue to address.\u201d The email continued: \u201cRice is aware of private images that have recently resurfaced on social media. Rice is reviewing the allegations and is prepared to investigate any reports of misconduct.\u201d Many Shepherd students and faculty understood this to be a dismissal; many said it was long overdue for the self-proclaimed \u201chorn guru.\u201d Dozens of former students, colleagues and acquaintances of VerMeulen who spoke to the Thresher seem to agree on another thing: The allegations were far from recent. Illustration by The Barbed Wire \u201cWe knew,\u201d said Corin Droullard, who earned his master\u2019s in 2019 under VerMeulen. \u201cEveryone knew there were dick pics floating around. \u201cEveryone knew that Rice knew. The administration has known for 30 years.\u201d In the eight months since VerMeulen\u2019s retirement, 15 of his former students came forward to the Thresher with allegations of sexual misconduct in his studio. Four women told the Thresher that VerMeulen sexually solicited them or physically forced himself on them when they were current or recent students \u2014 describing experiences of unwanted touching, groping and 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 4/16 kissing. One was so traumatized by her experience in the late 2000s that, after speaking with reporters for months, she decided she was not emotionally prepared to detail her story publicly \u2014 but consented to being anonymously included in a total of survivors, since she does not want any other women to experience what happened to her. Eleven of those former students \u2014 who studied under VerMeulen as early as 1995, and as late as 2019 \u2014 said they witnessed sexualized jokes, overtures, innuendos and a broader culture of misogyny apparent in VerMeulen\u2019s lessons. His studio, \u201cthe Crew,\u201d became a microcosm of the larger brass world, those former students said: male-dominated, crude and often cruel, especially toward female students. Although Rice parted ways with VerMeulen after the private photos emerged on Facebook in 2024, several sources told the Thresher that they directly warned school administrators \u2014 starting with an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint and lawsuit in 1997, all the way up to 2022 \u2014 about allegations of the professor\u2019s allegedly inappropriate behavior toward students. The Thresher spoke with six working female horn players in the industry today who said their former professors had warned them to proceed with caution around VerMeulen, who is married, and that he had a reputation for being a \u201ccreep\u201d or \u201cwomanizer.\u201d Another five horn players \u2014 who teach the instrument in addition to playing with orchestras, common among professional musicians \u2014 told the Thresher that they would not feel safe sending students to study in VerMeulen\u2019s studio. In total, 26 people \u2014 former Shepherd pupils, horn students, previous colleagues of VerMeulen and professional hornists \u2014 said VerMeulen\u2019s reputation of sexual misbehavior was an open secret in the music world at large. VerMeulen declined an interview request, and despite multiple attempts, his attorney declined to respond to a list of questions about the allegations reported throughout this article, saying that he did not want to lend legitimacy to the claims. In response to a detailed list of questions about VerMeulen and Rice\u2019s handling of allegations against him the university said, \u201cRice takes all concerns of harassment and misconduct seriously. We cannot disclose specific details of investigations due to privacy protections.\u201d \u201cWe can share the faculty member retired last summer and Rice is no longer affiliated with him in any capacity,\u201d the statement continued. \u201cLast November, the Safety and Trust Taskforce was launched with faculty and staff at the Shepherd School of Music to focus on student safety, wellbeing and culture at the school. Dean Matthew Loden laid out a multi-phased approach to explore and implement measures to ensure safety, emotional support and inclusive practices that respect all individuals. Rice is committed to maintaining a respectful and safe environment. Sexual harassment or misconduct will not be tolerated.\u201d Though he is no longer at the school, VerMeulen still teaches private lessons and workshops, according to his personal website, and he remains the principal horn player and an endowed chair at the Grammy Award-winning Houston Symphony, a role he\u2019s held since 1990. Endowed chairs are common in major orchestras, where patrons, in exchange for a hefty donation, can have an orchestral chair named after them. The Houston Symphony, an historic and well-respected arts organization in the nation\u2019s fourth-largest city, asks for a $5 million donation to secure an endowed principal chair, meaning VerMeulen occupies one of the orchestra\u2019s most coveted and high-profile seats. \u201cThis matter has been brought to our attention,\u201d the symphony said in a statement after VerMeulen\u2019s departure from Rice, and again in response to questions from the Thresher and The Barbed Wire. \u201cWhile we do not comment on individual personnel matters, as a fundamental principle we evaluate any allegations of misconduct and will take any actions we determine are necessary and appropriate to ensure that we are providing a safe environment for our musicians, staff, and the public.\u201d The symphony confirmed on Friday Jan. 31 that VerMeulen still holds his position as principal hornist. The majority of sources for this story were named victims of VerMeulen\u2019s alleged advances, but many of those who say they experienced what they described as his predatory behavior within the last 15 years spoke only on the condition of anonymity, out of fear of professional retaliation. \u201cPeople still fear the influence that he has, even now. He\u2019s risen from the ashes before,\u201d said Dominic Rotella, who studied with VerMeulen from 2017 to 2019 and is currently principal horn of the Richmond Symphony. \u201cHe's still employed by the Houston Symphony, and so he's still responsible for who gets to [substitute] with that orchestra. And what's to say that a couple years from now the temperature gets dialed down a bit and some other university hires him?\u201d Several sources also expressed fear of a lawsuit by VerMeulen. When the Thresher reached VerMeulen\u2019s attorney, Steve Silverman, for comment about the allegations, he wrote back, \u201cShould you print such an article, there may be unintended consequences for you and your paper.\u201d In follow-up emails and conversations, Silverman claimed that other news outlets in both Houston and Baltimore had been working on stories about VerMeulen or the private photos that led to his retirement. But Silverman claimed he had successfully convinced other news organizations to drop any articles before they reached publication, citing potential litigation. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 5/16 The Thresher and The Barbed Wire were not able to independently verify those claims. \u2018Collateral damage\u2019 The very first time Carey Potts met William VerMeulen, she knew something was wrong. It was the spring of 1995 and she, like many young horn players at the time, wanted to join the Shepherd School of Music. VerMeulen, then five years into his tenure at Rice, had already started to establish his horn studio as a home for burgeoning talent. But at the first audition, her gut said something didn\u2019t feel right, she told the Thresher. He leered at her the whole time, gave her \u201ccreepy, ugly\u201d looks. He told Potts that she reminded him of his first girlfriend, she said. She left that audition unsettled and declined a seat in VerMeulen\u2019s horn studio, then took a year off music and got married. But Potts, who had spent her entire young life playing the horn, didn\u2019t know a world without music. So in 1996, she tried again and re-auditioned at Rice. She joined in the fall semester. Within a year, she had filed a complaint against the school with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that shortly after the start of her classes at Shepherd, \u201cMr. VerMeulen began making remarks to me of a sexual nature and comments that indicated my staying in the program was contingent on staying in his good graces.\u201d Potts subsequently sued Rice, claiming the school maintained \u201ca policy of sexual harassment (hostile work environment and quid pro quo),\u201d according to court records obtained by the Thresher. The civil lawsuit was filed Dec. 9, 1997 in federal court for the Southern District of Texas, and the school settled the case for an undisclosed amount. Potts agreed to speak with the Thresher about her experience at Rice and with VerMeulen but did not discuss the lawsuit or her complaint, the latter of which did not lead to further action. Reporters used records and interviews with additional sources to fill in the sequence of events. From the moment she entered Rice, Potts said she felt indebted to VerMeulen for giving her another chance. As classes began, VerMeulen \u201cproceeded to make sexually suggestive remarks and innuendos,\u201d Potts alleged in her civil lawsuit. His \u201cpressure caused her marriage to fail,\u201d she continued in her civil lawsuit, \u201cand she and her husband got divorced as a result.\u201d He began to invite her to lunch and to dinner, she wrote in her notice of charge of discrimination, and \u201chis sexual innuendo, comments and sexual propositions escalated while he continuously reminded me of the tenuous nature of my involvement in the program and his ability to oust me from the school.\u201d \u201cIn order to be referred for playing jobs outside the school, recommendations for professional positions and commendations to the faculty and students at the Shepherd School, he insisted that acquiesce to his sexual demands,\u201d Potts continued in her charge really felt a lot of shame,\u201d she told the Thresher was such a young, eager to please, easy to shame person back then, and think he knew it.\u201d She relented to his advances and began a sexual relationship that lasted about two months. By the end of the semester, Potts was saddled with health problems \u2014 \u201csignificant physical manifestations of her mental anguish,\u201d as alleged in her civil suit \u2014 and she had sought help from Paul English, a Houston-based composer and VerMeulen\u2019s best friend at the time. While away on vacation, VerMeulen had asked English to check in on Potts, who \u201cbroke down\u201d and told English everything: \u201cShe felt like her whole career at Rice depended on that relationship,\u201d English said in an interview with the Thresher. \u201cThe definition of \u2018rape\u2019 back then for innocent white males like me was different,\u201d English said. \u201cDid he hold her down? Did he strap her to a table? Did he hold a gun to her head?\u201d \u201cNot to my knowledge, but there are other kinds of rape,\u201d he added. \u201cOne is \u2018You'll either do this or you won't have your scholarship.\u2019\u201d Before classes began for the spring 1997 semester, the three agreed that Potts and VerMeulen would maintain a professional student-teacher relationship and that they\u2019d keep what happened to themselves. Yet, as the semester progressed, VerMeulen became \u201cirate and hostile,\u201d retaliating against Potts, court records allege. \u201cAmong other things, he excluded her from participation in class programs, constantly criticized her, failed to provide her with proper instruction, made false and untrue remarks about her to classmates and others,\u201d according to Potts\u2019 civil suit. Later, as Potts and English spent more time together, they began dating. On Oct. 2, 1997, Potts and English met with Catherine Keneally, Rice\u2019s then-director of the school\u2019s Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Opportunity, \u201cto complain about Mr. VerMeulen\u2019s sexual harassment and retaliation,\u201d according to the lawsuit. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 6/16 At the time, Rice\u2019s sexual harassment policy \u2014 issued in 1981, then revised in 1989 and 1992 \u2014 defined sexual harassment as \u201cunwelcome sexual advances, unwelcome requests for sexual favors, and other unwelcome verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature,\u201d often when an individual\u2019s education or employment status is conditional on \u201csubmission to such conduct.\u201d Potts and English said the meeting with Keneally was for informal advice. There, they said, Keneally pushed Potts to file a formal complaint. Potts pushed back. \u201cI'm like, \u2018No really don't want to do that,\u2019\u201d she said. Instead, Potts remembered asking if there was a way to get VerMeulen to back off quietly without it escalating. \u201cBut that didn\u2019t happen.\u201d Potts had a meeting scheduled with then-Shepherd Dean Michael Hammond the next day to seek his advice, which she said Keneally advised her to cancel. After choosing to keep the appointment anyway, Potts and English remembered arriving at Hammond\u2019s office the next morning and the doors opening to reveal Keneally already inside, sitting opposite Hammond\u2019s desk. \u201cPaul already know everything,\u201d English remembered Hammond saying. English told Hammond that it was \u201cimpossible not to suspect that it was a damage control meeting,\u201d according to records. According to the lawsuit, \u201cMs. Keneally breached the confidentiality of Plaintiff\u2019s complaints and informed the Dean of the Shepherd School, Michael Hammond, about her allegations. This information was then disseminated to Mr. VerMeulen who offered to resign, but was refused by Dean Hammond.\u201d Both Keneally and Hammond are deceased, and thus, could not be reached to verify the lawsuit\u2019s claims. Rice\u2019s statement above did not include answers to questions from the Thresher about Potts\u2019 lawsuit, complaint or experience with school administrators. Two days later, Kristina Crago \u2014 another student in the horn studio \u2014 was confused when her classmate, Carey Potts, gathered the group after a recital. Potts had been having \u201csexual relations\u201d with their professor, she told the studio. She was going to sue Rice. Crago was one grade below Potts. The two had barely spoken, but she had heard rumors about Potts\u2019 relationship with VerMeulen. \u201cMy first thought was, \u2018This is horrible hate that this happened to her,\u2019\u201d Crago remembers. Her next thought: \u201cI'm five weeks into my master's. What am going to do with my degree?\u201d It seemed almost guaranteed, she said, that Potts\u2019 allegations would get him dismissed at Rice. When they didn\u2019t, she said, \u201cYou go from, \u2018Oh, good, we still have him [at Shepherd]. And then you're like, \u2018Wait a minute, will be safe around him?\u2019\u201d VerMeulen was instead suspended for an academic year, and his studio was temporarily led by hornists Bruce Henniss and Roger Kaza. Henniss declined a request for comment, but Kaza, who had previously played as an associate hornist with the Houston Symphony Orchestra, confirmed that he arrived at Rice in the spring of 1998 as a substitute instructor for Potts. He and Henniss led VerMeulen\u2019s studio during the 1998-1999 school year, according to digitized Shepherd programs. \u201cEverybody knew everything,\u201d Kaza said about VerMeulen\u2019s suspension that year. \u201cThere were no secrets at all.\u201d At the time, administrators tasked a grievance committee made up of Rice graduate students and professors from different departments to determine if VerMeulen was fit to continue teaching. In a final report obtained by the Thresher, the committee acknowledged that VerMeulen was in a position of direct authority over Potts and such \u201ccircumstances call into question the very concept of consent.\u201d The report referenced the \u201cAmorous Relationships Statement,\u201d ratified by Rice faculty a few years earlier to discourage sexual relationships between teachers and students, prompted by another sexual harassment case between a male professor and female student, according to a New York Times article. The statement said, in part: \u201cWhen the faculty member has professional jurisdiction over the student, sexual relationships (including sexual touching and sexual propositioning) violate professional ethics and could result in disciplinary action as described in the Sexual Harassment Policy.\" But the committee did not suggest disciplinary action for VerMeulen. It categorized Potts\u2019 allegations as an \u201caffair\u201d that was \u201cmore than likely\u201d consensual and found that she \u201carrived at a distorted perspective of the affair after the relationship ended.\u201d The report described Potts as an uncommitted student and horn player, angry, difficult to teach and with \u201cunresolved problems in both her personal and professional life.\u201d English, who was interviewed by the committee, wrote a 46-page rebuttal to the report \u2014 calling it \u201cpoorly presented, factually incorrect, misleading and dangerously irresponsible\u201d and filled with \u201csmear tactics\u201d \u2014 which he said he printed, bound and delivered to nearly a dozen administrators. He never received a response. \u201cThe school protects the teacher because they have an investment in the teacher,\u201d English told the Thresher. \u201cThe investment in the student is minimal. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 7/16 \u201c\u2018We can trash a few students, collateral damage,\u2019\u201d he added. \u201cThat's basically their attitude.\u201d Throughout the ad hoc committee\u2019s report are references to evidence of inappropriate patterns of behavior consistent with violations of Rice\u2019s sexual harassment policy at the time, including: a domineering, forceful style of teaching that included a \u201ccrew\u201d concept that meant \u201csocializing with him was a significant element\u201d of the program, and disagreement with him could lead to the \u201cgroup as a whole closing ranks\u201d on the disagreeing individual use of \u201csexually-explicit similes and metaphors in classroom situations\u201d \u201ccomments to female students that could be taken to imply sexual interest like \u2018Oh, you're a babe, you're just the sort of girl I'd have been interested in myself 15 years ago.\u2019\u201d an undisputed case in which VerMeulen engaged in \u201cflirtatious banter with clear sexual innuendos\u201d another \u201cformer female student who, like Ms. Potts, claims she was sexually harrassed by Mr. VerMeulen.\u201d Yet, the committee justified each element domineering teaching style was \u201cclearly viewed by many as the only way to train and produce absolutely first-rate, world-class musicians.\u201d Sexually explicit language in class also \u201cprobably has genuine musical validity.\u201d Also, VerMeulen had learned his lesson, and he\u2019d \u201cclearly recognized the problems inherent in his flirtatious interactions with some young women and has made significant changes towards a more appropriate professional style.\u201d As for the other allegation of sexual harassment? \u201cThe testimony of this student is problematic,\u201d the committee concluded. \u201cShe is known to have persistently mis-interpreted the non-sexual friendly behavior of a fellow male student, despite repeated protestations to the contrary by the young man in question.\u201d (The committee did not include evidence of that assertion.) The committee\u2019s stance is all the more striking in light of one key detail: Though he initially denied it, VerMeulen admitted in a final interview that he\u2019d had a \u201csexual relationship\u201d with Potts and that his \u201cbehavior was a disgrace,\u201d according to the report did everything exactly according to their rules,\u201d Potts said followed the steps exactly, and they failed me. And so had to go then and find an attorney.\u201d The committee\u2019s response, she said, \u201cfelt like a witch hunt.\u201d One piece of evidence gathered by Potts and titled \u201cWhat know\u201d detailed conversations Potts had with other witnesses, including Myrna Meeroff and another female student who, according to a copy obtained by the Thresher, said that she had experienced similar sexual solicitations, innuendos and intimidation. VerMeulen\u2019s alleged misconduct apparently hadn\u2019t gone unnoticed by other members of the studio, either: Two men who studied in the studio that same year would often \u201cwork out a schedule\u201d to attend Crago\u2019s private lessons, she told The Barbed Wire. VerMeulen was still employing his open-door policy, which allowed any students to observe their peers\u2019 lessons. She didn\u2019t realize until they told her, months later, but the two students had taken turns observing her lessons \u2014 quietly watching over her in fear that VerMeulen might soon \u201ctarget\u201d Crago. \u201cHe made my skin crawl,\u201d she told the Thresher. Still, the committee concluded that the additional harassment complaints involved \u201cthe general teaching style of Mr. VerMeulen which cannot be viewed as a specific discrimination.\u201d VerMeulen returned to Shepherd in the fall of 1999. \u2018They fear retribution\u2019 \u201cThat laissez-faire attitude allowed very prominent male teachers to create their own reality. And the administration went along with it, which is the case with Bill VerMeulen,\u201d said Julie Landsman, former principal horn player at the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra and current faculty at University of Southern California\u2019s Thornton School of Music. \u201cThey wanted to let Bill do his thing. He attracted students, and the administrators were all about attracting students and letting the teachers with power have as much power as they could take.\u201d For years, the most prominent horn players in the country came through one of two studios: VerMeulen\u2019s or Landsman\u2019s. Landsman spent three decades at Juilliard, and she taught at Shepherd from 1982 to 1985. The two instructors rarely crossed paths, she said, but often disagreed with each other\u2019s pedagogy from afar. Landsman particularly disliked the \u201chero-worshiping, macho culture\u201d that VerMeulen cultivated in his studio, often at the expense of his female students\u2019 well-being, she told the Thresher. In August of 2022, Landsman scheduled a phone call with Matthew Loden, Shepherd\u2019s dean. Landsman and Loden had known each other for years, she said, meeting previously at a classical music festival and again at the Philadelphia Orchestra. At the time, Loden was new to the job at Rice \u2014 he was named in 2021 \u2014 and Landsman said she reached out to Loden on a related issue in VerMeulen\u2019s horn studio. Among the topics discussed was the \u201ctoxic\u201d culture, which it seemed that Loden already knew about, said Landsman. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 8/16 \u201cOh, yes, I'm aware that Bill has a history. He is on a short leash,\u201d Landsman remembers Loden saying. In a statement to The Barbed Wire, Loden confirmed that the two spoke on the phone about VerMeulen in 2022 but said he did not remember specific wording. \u201cBecause we take all allegations of misconduct seriously notified the Title office and they initiated a review process in accordance with our policies,\u201d Loden said Monday. \u201cAt that time, we did not have sufficient information to take immediate or specific action.\u201d Before VerMeulen\u2019s retirement, the Thresher and The Barbed Wire found that Rice and its Title office were informed through the complaint and lawsuit in 1997, a Title case in the late 2010s, and through Loden \u2014 via Landsman \u2014 in 2022. Attorney Cari Simon, who has represented sexual assault survivors in university and K-12 settings, told the Thresher that \u201cTitle IX\u2019s mandate (is) that a school stop sexual harassment and prevent its reoccurrence.\u201d In an interview during which the Thresher provided Simon with the contours of the reporting for this story, the attorney said, \u201cTo the extent that there's been a pattern and you're seeing that pattern, why aren\u2019t you addressing the pattern?\u201d According to other emails obtained by the Thresher, Rice retained an outside law firm after VerMeulen\u2019s 2024 retirement to investigate the allegations against him. They contacted Potts with a list of questions about her time at Rice, emails show, and reached out to at least three other people with knowledge of VerMeulen\u2019s alleged misconduct. Neither Potts, nor the three other people, have heard from the university in months. Rice would not comment on the existence or status of any pending investigations. The Captain Some call the French horn a weapon of war. The 12-foot-long child of the sonorous brass family is one of the loudest instruments in an orchestra. It demands a certain brawn \u2014 and lung capacity \u2014 from its user. Because of that, the brass music scene, which includes trumpets, tubas and trombones, is often a hyper-masculine one: more akin to a \u201cboys\u2019 club,\u201d said trombonist Abbie Conant. In the studio, the instructor is tantamount to God. Many professional players start young, first picking up their instrument in early childhood. As they grow up, their art demands more hours, more energy. Young musicians learn to place their faith, sometimes blindly, in an all-knowing instructor who promises success. These powerful figures often go unbridled by their institutions \u2014 several music veterans and students told the Thresher \u2014 granted free rein over their students, studios and symphonies. Conductors and principal players often wield the most power in the highly competitive music world, where there isn\u2019t enough orchestra demand to match the supply of talent. Cutthroat audition processes \u2014 the \u201corchestral Olympics,\u201d a current hornist called them \u2014 tend to favor those who curry favor among music\u2019s most-celebrated elite: just like William VerMeulen. VerMeulen grew up in a musical household, learning the ropes from his cellist mother, he told The Houston Chronicle in 2012. As a teenager, he studied horn at Michigan\u2019s Interlochen Arts Academy, a world-renowned boarding school and training program for burgeoning artists. As a freshman at Northwestern University, VerMeulen won a spot in the Kansas City Symphony. It was his first-ever audition, he said in a 1984 interview with The Horn Call, the International Horn Society\u2019s biannual journal, music blog Horn Matters reported in June 2024. Four years later, VerMeulen was on his third professional job, principal horn at the Honolulu Symphony. The principal slots, or the section leaders of each instrument, are some of the most coveted positions in an orchestra, earned through years of ceaseless training and stiff competition. By all accounts, VerMeulen seemed somewhat of a young prodigy: Peers his age were still training in their undergraduate studios. The Shepherd School of Music, established in 1974, was still recruiting new talent to prove itself as a nationally-ranked music school by the late \u201980s and early \u201990s. Then came VerMeulen, barely 30 years old and already with plenty of accolades under his belt. Hired in 1990, he spent the next 34 years at Rice drawing auditions from bright-eyed horn players across the country. His students won coveted orchestra roles, and his success rates were high \u2014 90% according to The Horn Call. Over time, his reputation started to precede him: Dominic Rotella, principal horn of the Richmond Symphony, recalls knowing VerMeulen as a \u201chot shot teacher\u201d before they met in the summer of 2005. The door to VerMeulen\u2019s studio was covered in yellow index cards, each detailing employment offers that his students had received over the decades. By 2021, he had amassed 515 offers, according to a post VerMeulen made on Facebook that year. Emblazoned across the door in capitalized cobalt letters: \u201cThe Few. The Proud. The Employed.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 9/16 For many aspiring musicians, a career path is clear: Start young. Train hard, and for many years. Audition at a studio to receive even more training. Then, audition for coveted \u2014 and ultra-competitive \u2014 orchestra seats. For this path, it seemed like VerMeulen\u2019s studio was the place to be. He had a unique formula for winning orchestral auditions, according to a former student from the \u201990s: a training program that taught students how to play under extreme pressure, how to hide their weaknesses and display their strengths. At Rice, \u201che was the (brass) program, in so many ways,\u201d said Corin Droullard, who earned his master\u2019s in 2019 under VerMeulen. VerMeulen\u2019s studio housed his \u201cCrew,\u201d the nickname he developed for his studio members. Immer crewdom, he would often write on his Facebook. Always the crew. Over time, this rhetoric gave way to a studio so tight-knit it bordered on cult-ish, six former students say. Steering the ship: the \u201cCaptain,\u201d a title VerMeulen embraced with enthusiasm. It was on posters for his recital; it was engraved into his whiskey bottles. Illustration by The Barbed Wire \u201cIt was a boys\u2019 club, sort of a Bill fanboy environment in the studio,\u201d Droullard said. \u201cThere\u2019s this sort of like demigod figure who walks in and commands the respect of the room \u2026 It\u2019s interesting talking to people afterwards, because thought that everyone bought in thought they were all on board [with] this \u2018Bill effect.\u2019 \u201cHe didn\u2019t feel like a professor,\u201d said Droullard. \u201cThere was this otherness.\u201d Many grew loyal to VerMeulen, and for good reason. He delivered on his promises to advance their careers. In an Houston audition described in a 2015 article in The Horn Call, the partition separating the candidates from the hiring committee dropped to reveal that all five finalists were VerMeulen\u2019s students. VerMeulen \u201crecused himself because he was so invested in each candidate's success.\u201d VerMeulen\u2019s defenders dismissed critiques of his style as jealousy. \u201cIt should be noted that VerMeulen has his detractors despite (or because of!) his success,\u201d The Horn Call published that same year. \u201cThere are those who intimate that his teaching is borderline cultism, tantamount to brainwashing asked him about these allegations and he good-humoredly acknowledged that he was certainly aware of them. No, he laughed, he does not call students at 4 am and demand they play Shostakovich!\u201d Even now, VerMeulen remains a beloved figure to some in the industry. In a May 2024 story, classical music site Slipped Disc portrayed VerMeulen as a victim of revenge porn. And a recent graduate of Shepherd\u2019s horn studio said VerMeulen was an incredible instructor who paved the path for every student who has graduated in recent years. For her part, Meeroff estimates that over half the industry still remains supportive of him. Several former students expressed apprehension about speaking to the Thresher on the record, saying they were conflicted about their former professor because he had given them so much show my resume, and don't have to take auditions to get into recording gigs and [substitute] lists,\u201d Droullard said. \u201cRice is an insanely powerful tool, and it 100 percent made me a better musician.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 10/16 VerMeulen\u2019s page on the Houston Symphony website claims he is \u201cone of today\u2019s superstars of the international brass scene\u201d and is \u201cone of the most influential horn teachers of all time,\u201d whose students have received 250 positions of employment at orchestras in New York, Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Los Angeles, Chicago and Israel. Still, one former student, who trained at Shepherd\u2019s horn studio in the \u201990s, remembered his professor as a volatile man, often marked by a temper, a deep conviction in his own talents, and a self-assurance so strong he was almost capable of \u201ccreating his own reality.\u201d In the studio, Rotella \u2014 the principal horn of the Richmond Symphony \u2014 describes a tenuous balance between VerMeulen\u2019s adept talents and \u201cboorish\u201d personality. Two current Shepherd professors, one former colleague, and one former student all describe him as an outright \u201cbully.\u201d Nine horn players who studied with VerMeulen said cruelty was a cornerstone of his instruction. \u201cThe music industry can be tough love,\u201d said one former student. \u201cBill was definitely the toughest.\u201d \u201cHe sort of appears to have self-styled himself as the \u2018horn guru,\u2019\u201d said violinist Lara St. John. St. John is also a gender equity activist and describes herself as an \u201cunofficial spokesperson of this music #MeToo movement.\u201d Though St. John never attended Shepherd or studied with VerMeulen, she said his reputation of alleged sexual misconduct was widely known across the horn world. \u201cPeople bought into that [horn guru attitude], it seems,\u201d St. John said. \u201cAnd what\u2019s really disgusting is, so did Rice. So did the Shepherd School.\u201d \u2018He was the victim\u2019 The first movement of Johannes Brahms\u2019 Symphony No. 2 features a horn solo, which is often taught in VerMeulen\u2019s studio. The solo starts off unassuming, just a whisper \u2014 pianissimo, very softly \u2014 as the pace briskens, unfolding into a soaring crescendo. Stringendo, the sheet music instructs: Tempo should quicken to a climax. Rebekah Daley joined Shepherd in 2010. In his lessons with her, VerMeulen described these bars as the build-up to an orgasm, Daley told the Thresher passage with dulcet tones: vaginal lubrication, he said. Articulating a short, staccato note through the instrument\u2019s mouthpiece: \u201cspitting a cunt hair\u201d out of your teeth. \u201cAny way that he could fit sex in, he would,\u201d Daley said. The grievance committee detailed VerMeulen\u2019s penchant for using sexual metaphors in class in its 1998 report, even using the Brahms example specifically, noting that it \u201cprobably has genuine music validity and apparently is a well-known interpretation of the piece.\u201d Another example the committee learned about \u2014 comparing lip and mouth positions while playing the horn to a \u201cblow job\u201d \u2014 \u201cobviously has no validity,\u201d the committee wrote. Though the committee found at least one student had been embarrassed by VerMeulen\u2019s \u201csexually-explicit language,\u201d it also said that \u201cit was clear to us that Mr. VerMeulen has been undergoing a learning process, recognizing that language and conversation styles appropriate for his professional orchestra friends are not appropriate for the classroom.\u201d Yet, for decades afterwards, the Thresher found that at least eight students continued to witness inappropriate, explicitly sexual metaphors employed in his instruction. The Thresher and The Barbed Wire reviewed more than 20 hours of one-on-one lessons recorded by a former student in the late 2000s through 2010. In an early 2010 lesson, VerMeulen said was about to kiss you for how gorgeous you sounded right here\u201d after the former student played a verse. Several months later, he was discussing his finances mid-lesson mean make a ton of money\u201d \u2014 before saying to her take you [students] out all the time haven't taken you out in a while.\u201d In another, he asks the student about the meaning of a German title of a musical piece \u2014 which translates to \u201cmaiden in the bridal chamber\u201d \u2014 and says: \u201cBefore or after the wedding? I\u2019m just trying to get my motivation.\u201d Later, in an interview with the Thresher, the student said re-listening to the audio made her \u201cuncomfortable.\u201d In the moment, she remembered deflecting the conversation to talk about his family wanted to start recording my lessons because if anything made me uncomfortable wanted to be recording,\u201d she said, \u201cin order to have that protection.\u201d In another recorded lesson from 2010, the student is audibly stifling tears after an hour of sharp reviews. \u201cYou know think you\u2019re wonderful, right?\u201d VerMeulen asks, saying he will take her to lunch \u201cto be nice.\u201d Hannah*, who spoke to the Thresher on the condition of anonymity out of fear of professional retaliation, joined Rice\u2019s horn studio in the late 2000s for her master\u2019s degree. She remembers the \u201cvaginal lubrication\u201d metaphor used often, and vividly, in her lessons. VerMeulen\u2019s harsh criticism \u2014 \u201cforceful and domineering,\u201d as the 1997 report said \u2014 was often intertwined with overt sexualization and dirty jokes. She said many horn students, both Rice and Houston-based, would often sit in on her lessons, in line with VerMeulen\u2019s open door policy. After one such lesson ended, she remembered being pulled aside by a local freelancer who had observed her session. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 11/16 \u201cThe man asked me, like, \u2018Are you okay? That was the filthiest lesson I\u2019ve ever witnessed.\u2019\u201d Hannah doesn\u2019t remember what VerMeulen had said to her that day. \u201cIt was just normal. The only thing that stuck with me was that this freelancer asked me about it after, because it kind of broke the spell for me,\u201d she said. In early 2017, VerMeulen \u2014 then 56 years old \u2014 was in a relationship with a graduate student and the original recipient of the private photos mentioned in Rice\u2019s announcement of his retirement. She wasn\u2019t a horn player and didn\u2019t study directly under VerMeulen. But her close friend, Lindsay*, confirmed to the Thresher that the relationship started when she was a graduate student at the Shepherd School. Lindsay spoke to the Thresher about her experience with VerMeulen on the condition of anonymity out of fear of professional retaliation. \u201cHe absolutely abused his position of power,\u201d she said, \u201cand think that he knowingly engaged in an inappropriate relationship few months after that relationship ended, in 2017, VerMeulen was visiting Lindsay\u2019s school to teach masterclasses. The two got coffee and, despite her attempts to keep conversation neutral, he quickly pivoted to discussing the relationship with Lindsay\u2019s friend. \u201cHe did not seem remorseful at all [about the relationship],\u201d she told the Thresher. \u201cHe seemed to feel, in a lot of ways, that he was the victim.\u201d Lindsay said he spoke disparagingly about the #MeToo movement, which had just started to reach its zenith: \u201cHe felt the whole thing had been blown out of proportion because of the #MeToo movement. Not because it was an inappropriate relationship, but because of the culture that was happening.\u201d Thirty minutes later, she returned to campus with one thought in her mind: This is the worst person know. VerMeulen\u2019s attorney claimed that a Title investigation by Rice over the photos yielded no findings of wrongdoing by VerMeulen. (Rice would not comment on specific Title investigations related to VerMeulen during his tenure.) Rice did not have an official policy prohibiting student-teacher sexual relationships in 2017. It wasn\u2019t until two years later, in September 2019, when Rice instituted a new policy that sexual or romantic relationships between graduate students and teachers with \u201cdirect or indirect professional or supervisory responsibility\u201d are prohibited. For undergraduate students, relationships \u201care prohibited, regardless of current or future professional responsibility over such students.\u201d He kissed her. It was unwanted. When Rebekah Daley joined Shepherd in 2010, she had heard rumors about VerMeulen\u2019s history of sleeping with students and was familiar with VerMeulen\u2019s reputation for sexual misbehavior \u2014 calling it one of the industry\u2019s \u201cpoorly kept secrets.\u201d \u201cPeople would say, \u2018What the fuck are you doing, going to Rice and studying with him?\u2019\u201d But at the end of the day, VerMeulen was good at what he did. His career spanned decades and continents; his students won coveted spots in orchestras. So Daley walked into his studio, braced for what may come. \u201cIt was known that [VerMeulen] broke as many as he made,\u201d Corin Droullard contends had heard, \u2018If you\u2019re a girl, don\u2019t go to Rice.\u2019\u201d Sarah*, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of professional retaliation, said the thought of auditioning at Shepherd never crossed her mind as a young musician. Around 2005, her high school teacher had steered her away from the horn studio \u2014 and she believed it was because of VerMeulen\u2019s reputation with female students. \u201cWhen this sort of behavior is considered acceptable by an institution, it hurts women. It hurts our chances at success in these really small ways that add up,\u201d she said was successful without Bill\u2019s tutelage. But always wonder, if had been a student, what would it have afforded me?\u201d Daley, who stayed long enough to finish her degree, tried her best to grit her way through. VerMeulen\u2019s lessons, she said, were draped in sexual overtones; his gaze, when not on his music, was often fixated elsewhere. \u201cYou could just tell when he was attracted to students,\u201d Daley said. \u201cIt was very obvious, like when he was seeing them as a sexual object.\u201d When she was 22 years old, her drink of choice was a Belgian tripel. VerMeulen often bought them for her, she said, just before his semi-frequent \u201ccrew parties\u201d at his house. \u201cHe did these grooming behaviors (that) are so effective,\u201d Daley said. \u201cThis is a very, very busy man. And he made a special trip, to a special store, just to get me the beer that like.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 12/16 Most of the horn studio attended the parties, eight former students told the Thresher. Crew parties were often incomplete without the communal Captain\u2019s punch, a brew of VerMeulen\u2019s own making. It was typically a giant picnic cooler filled with a few types of rum and juice; \u201cit really sneaks up on you,\u201d one former student remembered. Adults were scarce at these parties, Daley said. \u201cThere was a lot of alcohol, a lot of underage drinking in his presence,\u201d said Jeffrey Rogers, who attended Shepherd for his undergraduate degree from 1994-1999. \u201cWe used to get completely wasted and he\u2019d make us play through pieces.\u201d \u201cIn hindsight, the thing that sticks in my mind the most is that the level of drunkenness was extreme,\u201d said Hannah, who studied with VerMeulen in the late 2000s. She departed the studio after winning a short-lived job in an orchestra several cities away, though would sometimes return to Houston \u2014 common for many of VerMeulen\u2019s former students \u2014 to take private lessons before important auditions. During one such visit, Hannah found herself in Houston just in time for a notorious crew party. Toward the end of the night, she said VerMeulen drunkenly pulled her aside. He often got \u201cextraordinarily drunk, as drunk as (the students) did,\u201d she remembers. Hannah\u2019s memory is blurry from the alcohol, she said \u2014 she, too, had partaken in VerMeulen\u2019s remarkably strong punch \u2014 but she remembered two things: He kissed her. It was unwanted just was like, \u2018Ew, gross. What the fuck was that?\u2019\u201d she said. She didn\u2019t speak of that night for years afterward, she told the Thresher. Not until she started hearing about other allegations against him, \u201cIt didn\u2019t bother me until heard all of this other stuff coming out,\u201d she said, \u201cand then saw it as part of a larger pattern, rather than just this drunken moment.\u201d Rachel*, who studied with VerMeulen in the late 2000s \u2014 and similarly requested anonymity, fearing professional retribution \u2014 said her time at Shepherd was similarly marked by overly sexual jokes and flirtatious remarks, leaving her uncomfortable and often frozen love a woman with a good bottom,\u201d she remembered him commenting in group chamber coaching, chuckling at the double entendre; she had just played a deep, low note at the bottom of her range. At least four or five times, she remembers VerMeulen complimenting her body, saying she looked great in a bikini. Sometimes it was during private lessons, other times at his house during the studio\u2019s crew parties, where he often encouraged students to use his hot tub, she said. She additionally remembers him being \u201cdiscouraging\u201d of her relationships at the time. She didn\u2019t know it at the moment, she said, but looking back, she said she has since realized his jokes and comments were an invitation to have \u201csome sort of a flirtatious, romantic, sexual relationship with him.\u201d \u201cHe gradually throws in little comments that are too sexual to see how you'll tolerate it,\u201d she added. \u201cThey just keep getting more and more and more sexual and more inappropriate until you're just in a pot of boiling water, and you don't realize it.\u201d Rebekah Daley\u2019s time at Shepherd was draining, she remembered. Too much of her energy \u2014 energy that she believes should have been spent honing her instrument \u2014 was instead directed toward protecting herself think it would be really interesting to go to school and assume that the teacher is there trying to teach you, and trying to do his best by you,\u201d Daley said. \u201cBut always knew that that was not going to be the reality for me.\u201d Daley has kept close contact with several of her peers from Shepherd, many of whom grappled with similar behavior in VerMeulen\u2019s studio think that no one has a lot of trust in Rice.\u201d \u201cAnd what about you?\u201d the Thresher asked. \u201cAbsolutely not. None.\u201d This story was fact checked by Leslie Rangel. Copy editing by Brian Gaar. Editing by Cara Kelly and Olivia Messer. Additional support by The Barbed Wire\u2019s art team and by Candace Henry and Billy Begala. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 13/16 2/18/25 11:10pm Startup incubator unveiled in Ion District By Hongtao Hu The Rice Nexus in the Ion building was opened to the public Feb. 14. The Nexus will assist selected faculty, student and alumni startups with office space and industry mentorship, free of charge 2/18/25 11:00pm Rice testifies for lawsuit against \u2018devastating\u2019 federal funding cuts By James Cancelarich Rice joined 70 other universities supporting a lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health, which may reduce research funding by billions of dollars Feb. 7 memo announced a drastic cut to indirect costs, which covers overhead for research institutions; including funding for lab spaces, water and power bills and paying subcontractors, according to testimony from Provost Amy Ditmtar 2/18/25 10:58pm 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 14/16 Federal grant cuts jeopardize $4 million of research funding By Saahithi Sreekantham Rice could lose up to $4 million in research funding due to cuts to National Institutes of Health grants, according to analysis by the New York Times. On Feb. 7, the proposed a drastic slash of funding for indirect costs, which include administrative and lab upkeep. The proposal was blocked by a federal court Feb. 11. 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 15/16 Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher. The Rice Thresher \u00a9 2025. All rights reserved. Powered by Solutions by The State News. 4 comments Sort by Join Easy Work \u2605\u5f61[\ud835\udc0d\ud835\udc04\ud835\udc04\ud835\udc03 \ud835\udc0f\ud835\udc04\ud835\udc0e\ud835\udc0f\ud835\udc0b\ud835\udc04 \ud835\udc05\ud835\udc0e\ud835\udc11 \ud835\udc0f\ud835\udc00\ud835\udc11\ud835\udc13 \ud835\udc13\ud835\udc08\ud835\udc0c\ud835\udc04 \ud835\udc0e\ud835\udc0d\ud835\udc0b\ud835\udc08\ud835\udc0d\ud835\udc04 \ud835\udc16\ud835\udc0e\ud835\udc11\ud835\udc0a]\u5f61 get paid over $220 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home never thought would be able to do it but my best friend earns over $35,000 a month doing this and she convinced me to try. it was all true and has totally changed my life... This is what do, check it out by Visiting Following Link Open This\u2192\u2192 Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 1w Sara Ashburn have made $300 reliably in one day.That was my ideal day in my life and my boss was to a great degree content with me is additionally awed from my work and is outstandingly happy..check also unpretentious parts by open the affiliation and tap on MEDIA......... This One ---------\u27a4 W\u00ad\u00adw\u00adw\u00ad.\u00ad\u00adC\u00ad\u00ada\u00ad\u00ads\u00adh\u00ad\u00ad4\u00ad\u00ad3\u00ad.\u00ad\u00adC\u00ad\u00ado\u00ad\u00adm Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 1w Nathanael Vlachos Curious to see what Houston Symphony will do about this. So far they haven't said/done much of anything and his glowing profile is still there Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 21h Thelma C. Phillips weekly based online home job to work with and received more than $6500 every week. stay at home and earns more dollars while staying at home with family. very easy job even a child can do this and makes money online.last month i have made $16258 from this easy job. simple and easy work just like copy and paste. follow this website for info. \ud835\udc07\ud835\udc04\ud835\udc11\ud835\udc04\u2192 \u2192 Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 17h b k t Pl i Oldest Add a comment... 713-348-4801 [email protected] 6100 Main St 524 Houston 77005 Sections News Sports Features Opinion Services About Us Contact Us Advertise Join The Thresher Story Idea? Search Search Latest Issue 2/22/25, 8:55 \u2018Collateral damage\u2019: Houston\u2019s top horn musician allegedly harassed Rice students for decades. And the school knew. - The Rice Thresher 16/16", "9068_105.pdf": "play_circle VIOLINIST\u2026 play_circle 2025 5 0 9 expand_circle_right Th \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 1/11 (Courtesy: William VerMeul \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 2/11 Multiple ex-students have come forward with stories of VerMeulen's mi Rice University had known about his behavior \"fo Horn player and professor William VerMeulen, who retired from Rice University's Sh May 2024 after X-rated images of him appeared on the internet, is the subject of fresh al long-form essay by Riya Misra, published collaboratively by student newspaper The news outlet The Barbed Wire, has now shared further details of VerMeulen's various sex piece also alleges that Rice and the were aware of VerMeulen's behavior and chose full essay here. The piece includes substantial testimony from survivor Myrna Meeroff, an ex-student o \"Once he realized that he wasn\u2019t going to get anything from me,\u201d Meeroff said, VerMeul confidence.\" VerMeulen allegedly behaved similarly with a friend of Meeroff's, telling her that if she r would \"make her life a living hell\" and told her that she was \"never going to be a horn pl The Barbed Wire discovered that the earliest allegation against VerMeulen was in 1997, w Employment Opportunity Commission complaint and lawsuit. Furthermore, the outlet wa attested that VerMeulen's \"reputation of sexual misbehavior was an open secret in the mu Last year, x-rated images of VerMeulen were shared on social media, and shortly after, h Ex-student Corin Droullard, who received his master\u2019s in 2019 under VerMeulen, told Th there were pics floating around.\" Further, he alleged that \"everyone knew that Rice knew years representative of Rice University told The Violin Channel that Rice takes all concerns We cannot disclose specific details of investigations due to privacy protections. \"We can share the faculty member retired last summer and Rice is no longer affiliated wi \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 3/11 continued. \"Last November, the Safety and Trust Taskforce was launched with faculty an to focus on student safety, wellbeing, and culture at the school. Dean Matthew Loden laid and implement measures to ensure safety, emotional support and inclusive practices that committed to maintaining a respectful and safe environment. Sexual harassment or misco VerMeulen has also served as the principal horn of the Houston Symphony since 1990. Teacher of America Certificate of Excellence from President Reagan and the White Hous VerMeulen's position as Principal Horn of the Houston Symphony remains unchanged In response to a request for comment, a member of the Houston Symphony administratio we do not comment on individual personnel matters, we are carefully evaluating the situa a safe and respectful environment for our musicians, staff, and the public. VerMeulen has also not responded to The Violin Channel's request. This is an ongoing sto | Classeek Presents Pianist Illia Ovcharenko Ch \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 4/11 2025 Jascha Heifetz Violin Competition February 16, 2025 Ric Grenell Appointed as Interim Executive Director of the Kenned February 12, 2025 New England Conservatory Presen Violinist Joshua Bro February 11, 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 5/11 Every Voice with Terrance McKnight \u2014 Episode 4 \"The Bowdoin Festival 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 6/11 Cellist Abel Selaocoe\u2019s New Album, \u201cHymns of Bantu February 21, 2025 Applications Open to 2025 Mirecourt International Violin February 21, 2025 Baritone Benjamin New Album, \u201cLines Life: Schubert and February 21, 2025 Texas\u2019s Moores School of Music Appoints Affiliate Artist in Violin February 21, 2025 Paavo J\u00e4rvi Cancels Concerts with the Staatskapelle Berlin February 21, 2025 New Record Label Launches in Vienna February 21, 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 7/11 14 22 15 18 19 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 8/11 \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 9/11 The Violin Channel is the New York City-based leading international classical music news media and streaming \u201cThank you Violin Channel for creating such a wo platform in our industry Professor of Violin - New England Conservat \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 10/11 The Violin Channel is the New York City based leading international classical music news, media and streaming platform \u2014 with over 600,000+ social media and app devotees and an email subscription base of over 100,000 people, the platform consistently reaches in excess of 2,000,000 eyeballs worldwide each and every month. It comprehensively covers international classical music goings-on far beyond just the violin and strings, and includes up-to-date industry news, masterclasses, competition coverage, interviews, educational resources, events, and concert livestreams, with a heavy focus on the promotion of highly promising young string soloists and ensembles. \u00a92023 The Violin Channel, All Rights Reserved \uf658 2/22/25, 8:55 Further Allegations Emerge Against Horn Player William VerMeulen 11/11"} |
7,877 | Michael L. Fine | Virginia Commonwealth University | [
"7877_101.pdf",
"7877_102.pdf",
"7877_103.pdf"
] | {"7877_101.pdf": "Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995 District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) July 26, 1995 892 F. Supp. 746 (1995) Amna KADIKI, Plaintiff, v UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Civ. No. 3:94CV530. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. June 23, 1995. As Corrected July 26, 1995. *747 *748 Carolyn Pullin Carpenter, Eileen N. Wagner, Carpenter, Woodward & Wagner, Richmond, VA, for plaintiff Amna Kadiki. Paul Joseph Forch, Richard Croswell Kast, Office of Atty. Gen. of Va., David Lee Ross, Jean Freeman Reed, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, for defendant Virginia Commonwealth University. 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 1/16 MERHIGE, District Judge. Amna Kadiki (\"Plaintiff\") alleges that Virginia Commonwealth University (\"Defendant\") discriminated against her on account of her sex in violation of Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1681 et seq. (\"Title IX\"). Plaintiff has moved for partial summary judgment and Defendant has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1331 and 1343. I. Plaintiff is a former student of Defendant Virginia Commonwealth University. As a student, Plaintiff enrolled in Biology 110, a course instructed by Associate Professor Michael Fine. On August 13, 1992, Plaintiff took a make-up biology examination, which Fine immediately evaluated. After reviewing the examination, Fine indicated that Plaintiff performed unsatisfactorily and that he would review the examination with her. The two met alone in Fine's office. After reviewing Plaintiff's performance, it is undisputed that Fine placed Plaintiff over his knees and spanked her repeatedly with his hand because her score fell below a previously agreed-upon level. Complaint \u00b6 14; Mem. in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment at 3; Fine Dep. at 62-68. The parties also agree that Fine told Plaintiff that she could retake the same examination the next day, but that she should bring a hairbrush with her and be prepared for another spanking if she did not achieve or exceed a certain score. Complaint \u00b6 13; Plaintiff Aff. \u00b6 6; Mem. in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment at 4; see Fine Dep. at 155. Fine purportedly told Plaintiff that her spanking would be \"worse\" the second time around. Plaintiff Dep. at 25. After the incident, Plaintiff sought medical care for a sore buttocks. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Summary Judgment, Ex. A-1. The same afternoon, Plaintiff's friend, Michael Casanovas, telephoned Fine in Plaintiff's defense. Plaintiff alleges that Fine offered her, through Casanovas, a grade of \"A\" in Biology 110 if she first spoke with Fine before complaining of the spanking incident. Casanovas Aff. \u00b6 9. Defendant, on the other hand, states that it was Casanovas who asked Fine to give Plaintiff a grade of \"C\" and bring the matter to an end. Fine Dep. at 76. Defendant also denies that Fine offered Plaintiff an \"A\" grade. See id. at 77. 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 2/16 Plaintiff soon commenced criminal and administrative proceedings against Fine. The criminal charges resulted in Fine's arrest and a November, 1992 conviction for misdemeanor assault. The administrative proceedings, which Plaintiff initiated by meeting with Dean of Students William Duvall, consisted of filing a charge with Dr. David Hiley, Dean of the College of Humanities & Sciences under Defendant's \"Rules and Procedures\" manual. After an investigation, Hiley concluded that Plaintiff's charges were valid and that Fine's actions were unprofessional, inappropriate and unacceptable. Complaint, Ex. B, Hiley Letter. Accordingly, Hiley placed Fine on probation, directed him to perform community service and recommended that he seek professional counseling. Id.; Mem. in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment at 8. Soon after the aforementioned proceedings had been initiated, Associate Professor of Biology Jennifer Stewart, a colleague of *749 Fine's, urged Plaintiff to withdraw the criminal charge on the basis, inter alia, that Fine is \"sensitive to the rights of women\" and would neither disrespect women nor harass female students. Complaint, Ex. C, Stewart Letter. Plaintiff suggests that Defendant's officials asked Stewart to write this letter in an effort to resolve the situation. Defendant, however, indicates that Stewart wrote the letter without any encouragement from Defendant's officials. From these allegations, Plaintiff pleads three causes of action under Title IX. First, she claims that Defendant created a hostile environment by subjecting her to unwelcome touching the spanking. Second, plaintiff alleges quid pro quo harassment in that Fine (1) through a conversation with Casanovas, allegedly offered her an \"A\" grade in exchange for delaying or refraining from bringing charges against him, and (2) conditioned the retaking of the examination on a possible second spanking. Finally, Plaintiff claims that Defendant harassed and retaliated against her by pressuring her to withdraw the criminal charges through Professor Stewart's letter. Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment on two issues. She first moves the Court to conclude that Fine's request that Plaintiff bring a hairbrush to the re-examination and subject herself to a possible second spanking constitutes an incident of quid pro quo harassment. Plaintiff also argues that Defendant is absolutely liable for any incidents of quid pro quo harassment. Defendant, on the other hand, moves for summary judgment as to all issues. II. [1] [2] 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 3/16 Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs motions for summary judgment. F.R.Civ.P. 56. Summary judgment is appropriate where parties do not dispute material facts that might affect the outcome of an action. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2510, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986). Under Rule 56, the movant bears the burden of proving the absence of any genuine issues of material fact, and the Court must view the facts and any justifiable and legitimate inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Id. at 248, 255-56, 106 S. Ct. at 2510, 2513- 14; Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp., 759 F.2d 355, 364 (4th Cir. 1985); Felty v. Graves-Humphreys Co., 818 F.2d 1126, 1128 (4th Cir.1987). Once the movant has met this burden, and a properly supported motion is before the Court, a nonmoving party, who will bear the burden of proof at trial on a dispositive issue, may not rest upon mere belief or conjecture, or the allegations and denials contained in his pleadings. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 2553, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986). Rather, the non- moving party must set forth specific facts with affidavits, depositions, interrogatories or other evidence to show a genuine issue for trial. Id. III. A. Applicable standards in a Title case Title prohibits sex discrimination against students and employees of educational institutions that receive federal funds: \"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal funds.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a). This statute carries an implied private right of action, Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 99 S. Ct. 1946, 60 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979), and thus permits students to recover damages for discriminatory conduct engaged in by their professors. Franklin v. Gwinnett County Pub. Sch., 503 U.S. 60, 75-76, 112 S. Ct. 1028, 1037-38, 117 L. Ed. 2d 208 (1992). While the Supreme Court has not expressly addressed whether Title actions are governed by Title standards, Franklin, 503 U.S. at 65 n. 4, 112 S. Ct. at 1032 n. 4, many lower courts have explicitly turned to Title and the broad body of related jurisprudence for guidance in Title cases, *750 at least in the employment discrimination context. E.g., Preston v. Comm'w of Va. ex rel. New River Community College, 31 F.3d 203, 207 (4th Cir.1994); Roberts v. Colo. State Bd. of Agric., 998 F.2d 824, 832 (10th Cir.), cert. 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 4/16 denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S. Ct. 580, 126 L. Ed. 2d 478 (1993) (same); Lipsett v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 896-97 (1st Cir.1988) (same). Moreover, the Franklin court indicated that the overriding principle of Title VII, i.e., the elimination of discriminatory treatment, intimidation and scorn, should extend to Title actions brought by students (as opposed to employees). Specifically, in Franklin, respondent school and the United States argued that damages were an inappropriate remedy because Title was enacted under Congress' Spending Clause power. 503 U.S. at 74, 112 S. Ct. at 1037. The Supreme Court disagreed on the rationale that intentional sex discrimination does not raise the concern that the entity receiving federal funds lacks notice that it will be liable for an award of damages. Id. (citing Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 17, 101 S. Ct. 1531, 1539-40, 67 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1981)). The Court, quoting Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 106 S. Ct. 2399, 91 L. Ed. 2d 49 (1986), continued: Unquestionably, Title placed on the Gwinnett County Public Schools the duty not to discriminate on the basis of sex, and \"when a supervisor sexually harasses a subordinate because of the subordinate's sex, that supervisor `discriminate[s]' on the basis of sex.\" We believe the same rule should apply when a teacher sexually harasses and abuses a student. Congress surely did not intend for federal monies to be expended to support the intentional actions it sought by statute to proscribe. Franklin, 503 U.S. at 75, 112 S. Ct. at 1037 (quoting Meritor, 477 U.S. at 64, 106 S.Ct. at 2404). Finally, the Supreme Court has admonished that Title should be given \"a sweep as broad as its language.\" North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 521, 102 S. Ct. 1912, 1918, 72 L. Ed. 2d 299 (1982). On this basis, this Court concludes that Title standards and the judicial interpretations thereof \"provide a persuasive body of standards to which we may look in shaping the contours of a private right of action under Title IX,\" whether such action is brought by an employee or a student. Preston, 31 F.3d at 207; e.g., Yusuf v. Vassar College, 35 F.3d 709 (2d Cir.1994) (citing 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e-2(m)) (Title provides an analogy for student's Title action charging sex discrimination in defendant's disciplinary system). [3] 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 5/16 B. Sexual harassment Sexual harassment is judicially recognized in two forms; Plaintiff seeks to recover under both theories. The first form, quid pro quo harassment, arises where a defendant's \" [u]nwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature\" are directly connected with the plaintiff's receipt of a job or education related benefit. Meritor, 477 U.S. at 65, 106 S. Ct. at 2404-05 (quoting 29 C.F.R. \u00a7 1604.11(a)). The second type of harassment occurs through the existence of an \"offensive or hostile\" environment. Id. at 64, 106 S. Ct. at 2404. The latter theory, however, is limited. Specifically, the environment must be more than subjectively hostile or abusive. \"Conduct that is not severe or pervasive enough to create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive is beyond Title VII's purview.\" Harris v. Forklift Sys., ___ U.S. ___, ___ - ___, 114 S. Ct. 367, 370-71, 126 L. Ed. 2d 295 (1993); accord Carter v. Ball, 33 F.3d 450, 461 (4th Cir.1994); Paroline v. Unisys Corp., 879 F.2d 100, 105 (4th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 900 F.2d 27 (4th Cir.1990). *751 1. Quid pro quo harassment Plaintiff charges Defendant, through Fine, with two instances of quid pro quo sexual harassment. To set forth a cognizable claim under this theory, a plaintiff must establish the following elements: 1. The employee belongs to a protected group. 2. The employee was subject to unwelcome sexual harassment. 3. The harassment complained of was based upon sex. 4. The employee's reaction to the harassment affected tangible aspects of the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. The 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 6/16 acceptance or rejection of the harassment must be an express or implied condition to the receipt of a job benefit or cause of a tangible job detriment to create liability. Further, as in typical disparate treatment cases, the employee must prove that she was deprived of a job benefit which she was otherwise qualified to receive because of the employer's use of prohibited criterion in making the employment decision. 5. The employer ... knew or should have known of the harassment and took no effective remedial action. Spencer v. General Elec. Co., 894 F.2d 651, 658 (4th Cir.1990). Where a supervisor engages in quid pro quo harassment, the fifth element is automatically satisfied. Id. at 658 n. 10. (a) Spanking and threatened spanking There is no dispute that Plaintiff satisfies the first element of quid pro quo harassment. As to the second element, the nature of the act, the parties are in disagreement and the record does little to settle this difference of opinion. For example, Fine testified at his deposition that his conduct resulted from a paternal interest in Plaintiff's academic performance. Fine Dep. at 82; see also id. at 54-56. He also denied that his actions were sexual, and apparently indicated so in a discussion with his department head within a week of the incident. Id. at 72; Smock Dep. at 32. Moreover, during his interview with Plaintiff, Dr. Hiley asked her whether she believed Fine's acts to be sexual, and Plaintiff allegedly replied \"no.\" Hiley Dep. at 29. In fact, Plaintiff in her deposition repeatedly referred to the incident as only a \"joke.\" Plaintiff Dep. at 27-29. Finally, Plaintiff did not pursue any action against Fine under the sexual harassment policy, but instead under Defendant's \"Rules and Procedures\" guidelines. Id. at 30. On the other hand, Plaintiff adamantly maintains that Fine's conduct was sexual. E.g., Plaintiff Dep. at 76; Plaintiff Aff. \u00b6 14. As to her discussion with Dr. Hiley, Plaintiff testified that she did not recall whether he inquired as to her perceptions of the nature of Fine's acts. In response to a question as to why she did not tell Dr. Hiley that she believed it was a sexual act, Plaintiff replied: 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 7/16 No just it was something more of a mutual that anyone would understand if say the story, but never mentioned it because ... thought that this is something that he would know automatically of the nature of the subject didn't think that would have to sit down and tell him that. Plaintiff Dep. at 76. Moreover, Plaintiff states that Defendant did not apprise her that there was a separate policy and procedure regarding sexual harassment, Plaintiff Aff. at 15-16, and even Hiley admitted that he did not provide such information to Plaintiff. Hiley Dep. at 30. Further facts suggesting that Fine's acts may have been sexual include the following: (1) Fine allegedly asked Plaintiff about her marriage plans and fianc\u00e9e around the time of the spanking and re-examination offer; (2) Fine does not believe in spanking as a disciplinary measure for his own children; and (3) Fine, in the actual spanking incident, repeatedly touched a portion of Plaintiff's body generally regarded as private and erogenous. Given the disagreement between the parties and the factual contradictions in the record, the Court concludes that it cannot decide as a matter of law that Fine's actions either were or were not sexual in nature. For the same reasons, the Court cannot decide the third Spencer element as a matter *752 of law. Specifically, while Defendant argues that Fine's actions were not motivated by gender, sufficient facts exist to permit a reasonable and justifiable inference to the contrary. The parties also disagree as to the fourth element of the quid pro quo harassment analysis. Defendant argues that Plaintiff had no legitimate expectation to a re-examination and that, even if she did, Fine unconditionally allowed her to retake the examination. The record, however, is not as clear as Defendant proposes. Any student legitimately has a general expectation to complete a course in which he or she is enrolled. Such expectations, however, are largely shaped by the individual responsible for establishing the requirements and parameters of a collegelevel course the professor. If a professor designates the taking of a re-examination as part of a student's course load, such re-examination, while not originally expected by the student, may be reasonably considered part of his or her general expectation in satisfactorily completing the course. In this sense, a reasonable inference exists that Plaintiff was \"qualified to receive\" the re-examination. Spencer, 894 F.2d at 658. The Court is also not persuaded, as a matter of law, that Fine unconditionally allowed Plaintiff to take the re-examination, as Defendant proposes. While Fine undoubtedly offered Plaintiff the opportunity to retake the examination, a fact finder could readily 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 8/16 conclude that he also attached a condition to the taking of such test. Specifically, there are sufficient facts in the record for one to reasonably and justifiably determine that Fine offered, and Plaintiff agreed to, the retest on the condition that she bring a hairbrush and acquiesce to a second spanking in the event she did not attain or exceed an agreed-upon score. Finally, the Court concludes that the fifth element is automatically satisfied in this matter. Indeed, a professor is authorized by his educational employer to design the curriculum and manage the classroom. For example, a professor is responsible for selecting material for daily study, guiding class discussion, setting assignments, administering examinations and overseeing student behavior. Given these job characteristics, a professor is analogous to a work place supervisor, and knowledge of any quid pro quo harassment of a student by a professor should be imputed to his employer. Cf. Spencer, 894 F.2d at 658 n. 10. Of course, such knowledge can only be imputed where the harassment occurs as part of the professor's professorial responsibilities. On this basis, the Court determines that a reasonable trier of fact may conclude that Fine's conduct with respect to the re-examination constitutes an incident of quid pro quo harassment. At the same time, a reasonable fact finder, for any number of reasons, could also reach the opposite conclusion. Accordingly, both Plaintiff's and Defendant's motions for summary judgment as to this issue will be denied. (b) Casanovas conversation As an alleged second incident of quid pro quo harassment, Plaintiff asserts that Fine, through his telephone conversation with Casanovas, offered Plaintiff an \"A\" grade \"if she would first come talk to Fine before making any complaints about the incident.\" Complaint \u00b6 19. Complaint \u00b6 43. Even if this allegation is true, which the parties dispute, such conduct was manifestly non-sexual and cannot be considered an incident of quid pro quo harassment. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment must be granted as to this claim of quid pro quo harassment. 2. Hostile environment harassment Plaintiff's also charges Defendant with intentionally creating a hostile environment \"by subjecting the Plaintiff to unwelcome touching of a sexual nature by a faculty 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 9/16 member.\" Complaint \u00b6 41. The primary facts in support of this claim include the August 13, 1992, spanking administered by Fine and his suggestion that an unacceptable result on the re-examination could result in a second spanking. After the spanking, Plaintiff did not want to see Fine again and was permitted to withdraw retroactively from Biology 110 and re- enroll the following fall term. She also states, inter alia, that *753 she is reluctant to enter the life sciences building, avoids classes taught by male professors and refrains from identifying herself in class. Plaintiff Aff. \u00b6\u00b6 20-24. The Fourth Circuit has established a two step analysis for establishing a cause of action for hostile environment. First, to be actionable, an educational environment must exhibit \"`discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult' that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions\" of the plaintiff's education or create an abusive atmosphere. Harris, ___ U.S. at ___, 114 S. Ct. at 370 cause of action for hostile educational environment will not lie where the acts complained of are \"isolated or genuinely trivial.\" Carter, 33 F.3d at 461 (emphasis added) (citing Katz v. Dole, 709 F.2d 251, 255 (4th Cir.1983); Strickland v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 693 F. Supp. 403, 405 (E.D.Va. 1988)). Second, the plaintiff \"must demonstrate that the employer either knew or should have known\" of the allegedly hostile environment and \"took no prompt and adequate remedial action.\" Swentek v. USAIR, Inc., 830 F.2d 552, 558 (4th Cir.1987) (citing Katz, 709 F.2d at 255). In the instant matter, the Court determines, as a matter of law, that Plaintiff has failed to establish a claim of hostile environment harassment. To begin, the Court is not convinced that the conduct complained of was sufficiently pervasive to satisfy the first prong of the Katz test. See Carter, 33 F.3d at 461; Strickland, 693 F. Supp. at 405. The Court will not decide that specific issue, however, because a more compelling fact warrants summary judgment on this issue. Specifically, the record unequivocally reveals that Defendant, through the actions of Duvall and Hiley, immediately investigated Plaintiff's complaint and, within one month of the subject spanking and threatened second spanking, imposed a variety of sanctions on Fine. See Deps. of Duvall, Hiley & Smock; Complaint, Ex. B. Because Defendant took \"prompt and remedial action\" with respect any conduct that involved Plaintiff, Plaintiff cannot prevail on her theory of hostile work environment harassment. Swentek, 830 F.2d at 558; see e.g., Strickland, 693 F. Supp. at 405 (Title VII); see also Dennis v. County of Fairfax, 55 F.3d 151, 155 (4th Cir.1995) (\u00a7 1981 racial harassment claim; \"where an employer implements timely and adequate corrective measures after harassing conduct has come to its attention, vicarious liability [for hostile work environment] should be barred regardless of the specific motivation for the wrongdoing or the particular cause of action\"). Accordingly, Defendant's motion for [4] [5] 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 10/16 summary judgment, to the extent it challenges Plaintiff's hostile environment claim, will be granted. 3. Retaliation Plaintiff claims that Defendant, through Professor Stewart, harassed and retaliated against her because she filed criminal charges against Fine. Stewart is responsible for sending a letter to Plaintiff in which Stewart expressed the \"hope that you will consider ending additional court proceedings\" against fine. Complaint, Ex. C. Stewart also stated that Fine is not the type of person to harass women. Again, such conduct simply does not rise to the level of harassment or retaliation. There is no evidence in the record even suggesting that Stewart was retaliating against Plaintiff for pursuing charges against Fine. Indeed, Stewart, more than anything else, was seemingly sharing her opinion of a colleague with another woman. The Court thus concludes that Plaintiff's claims of harassment and retaliation must fail as a matter of law, and will enter summary judgment in Defendant's favor as to this specific issue. *754 C. Defendant's scope of liability for quid pro quo harassment The Court has heretofore concluded that knowledge of quid pro quo harassment may be imputed to a university/employer where a professor is responsible for the harassing conduct. See supra Section III. B.1.a. In such cases, the university/employer is \"automatically liable\" for the harassment. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corp., 48 F.3d 1343, 1351 n. 3 (4th Cir.1995) (Title case) (citing Spencer, 894 F.2d at 658 n. 10). As stated in Lipsett: By referring with approval to the argument in the amicus curiae brief of the EEOC, [the Supreme Court] implicitly left intact the standard developed in the lower courts applicable to claims of quid pro quo sexual harassment and discriminatory discharges. Under this standard, an educational institution is absolutely liable [under Title IX] for such acts \"whether or not [i]t knew, should have known, or approved of the supervisor's actions.\" 864 F.2d at 901 (quoting Meritor, 477 U.S. at 70-71, 106 S.Ct. at 2407). 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 11/16 Defendant, citing Howard v. Bd. of Educ. of Sycamore Community Unit School Dist. No. 427, 876 F. Supp. 959 (N.D.Ill.1995), argues that strict liability principles do not apply in Title actions. In Howard, the court concluded that the defendant school board could be held liable for the actions of a high school principal only if it had actual knowledge of, or participated in, the discriminatory conduct. The court premised this holding on a determination that Title differed from Title in that the latter expressly defines \"employer\" to include \"any agent of such a person\" while the former fails to encompass agents within the interpretation of \"program or activity.\" 876 F. Supp. at 974. Defendant's reliance on Howard is misplaced. To begin, the Howard court was not directly addressing the scope of liability for quid pro quo harassment. Second, and more importantly, the Howard court interpreted the definition of \"program or activity\" in an exceedingly narrow fashion. Indeed, Congress, in interpreting \"program or activity\" as \"all the operations of ... a college [or] university,\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1687, admonished that Title be accorded a \"broad, institution-wide application\" and expressed a concern that this \"broad application\" had been \"unduly narrowed\" by recent court opinions. Pub.L. No. 100- 259, \u00a7 2, 102 Stat. 28 (1988). Thus, where any operation of a university has a discriminatory impact on a student or group of students, Congress has decisively concluded that Title must be broadly interpreted to prohibit such discrimination as long as \"any part\" of the university \"is extended federal assistance.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1687. Indeed, the overriding objective of Title IX, seemingly overlooked by the Howard court, is to prevent the use of federal resources to support any form of discrimination, based upon gender. Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 694, 99 S. Ct. 1946, 1956-57, 60 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979). Given the purpose of Title and Congress' mandate that Title be broadly interpreted, it is essentially inconsequential that Title does not expressly adopt agency principles. This conclusion is neatly illustrated by the case at bar. The academic aspects of a university, including the administration of examinations and the assignment of grades, are quintessential university \"operations.\" Authority to manage these \"operations\" is primarily delegated to professors. Where a professor exploits his authority over these \"operations\" to engage in discriminatory behavior, Title must be available to impose liability on his employer or Congressional intent would plainly be thwarted. See Lipsett, *755 864 F.2d at 901 (university may be held vicariously liable under Title IX). This Court has heretofore concluded that Title standards apply to private causes actions under Title IX; thus, where a professor engages in quid pro quo harassment, a university may be held strictly liable. See Martin, 48 F.3d at 1351 n. 3 (Title case). [6] [7] 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 12/16 In summary, should a trier of fact determine that Fine's conduct constituted quid pro quo harassment, Defendant must be held strictly liable. Indeed, Fine's actions occurred at school during school hours and directly involved a student whom Defendant authorized Fine to teach and administer examinations. An appropriate Order shall issue This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Upon due consideration, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum this date filed, and deeming it just and proper so to do, it is and as follows: (1) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that Fine's conduct was not an act of sexual harassment, be and the same is hereby DENIED; (2) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that Fine's conduct concerning the re-examination did not constitute an incident of quid pro quo harassment, be and the same is hereby DENIED; (3) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that the circumstances concerning Fine's conversation with Casanovas did not constitute an incident of quid pro quo harassment, be and the same is hereby GRANTED; (4) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that it cannot be held strictly liable for an act of quid pro quo harassment, be and the same is hereby DENIED; [8] 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 13/16 (5) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that the conduct of Professor Stewart did not constitute harassment and retaliation, be and the same is hereby GRANTED; (6) Defendant's motion for summary judgment, to the extent that it seeks a determination that Plaintiff has failed to establish a cause of action for hostile environment harassment, be and the same is hereby GRANTED; (7) Plaintiff's motion for partial summary, to the extent that it seeks the Court to rule that Fine's conduct concerning the re-examination constituted an incident of quid pro quo harassment, be and the same is hereby DENIED; (8) Plaintiff's motion for partial summary, to the extent it seeks a ruling that Defendant is absolutely liable for incidents of quid pro quo harassment and assuming that a finder of fact concludes that Fine's conduct concerning the re- examination may be so characterized, be and the same is hereby [1] Testimony in the criminal matter and discovery in the instant matter have revealed that Fine spanked another female student several years prior to the instant matter. He has also threatened to do the same to other female students. Fine Dep. at 24. These incidents were apparently unreported and thus unknown to Defendant. Moreover, Plaintiff does not allege that she was directly affected by these earlier events. [2] Plaintiff initially complained of retaliatory conduct by a second professor. She indicates in her response to Defendant's summary judgment motion, however, that she is no longer pursuing that claim. [3] Meritor is a landmark sexual harassment case decided under Title VII. In affirming the Court of Appeals' determination that \"unwelcome sexual advances that create an offensive or hostile working environment violate Title VII,\" the Meritor Court stated: \"Without 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 14/16 question, when a supervisor sexually harasses a subordinate because of the subordinate's sex, that supervisor `discriminate[s]' on the basis of sex.\" 477 U.S. at 64, 106 S. Ct. at 2404. [4] Plaintiff also seems to rely on Fine's admission that he previously spanked and/or threatened to spank other female students. Plaintiff, however, fails to state how these incidents impacted her educational experience; thus, these facts provide only marginal support for a hostile environment claim. See White v. Federal Express Corp., 939 F.2d 157, 161 (4th Cir.1991) (where racial incidents largely involved other employees, plaintiff had no harassment cause of action under Title VII). [5] Moreover, Defendant promptly instituted additional charges against Fine upon his revelation that he spanked a second student several years earlier. Hiley Aff. [6] Congress amended Title through the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987. In particular, Title was amended to include a section entitled \"Interpretation of `Program or Activity.'\" Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987. Pub.L. No. 100-259, \u00a7 3(a), 102 Stat. 28, 28-29 (1988). This section, now codified at 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1687, was unequivocally fashioned to restore the broad scope of Title coverage. [7] Congress was particularly concerned with the Supreme Court's decision in Grove City College v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555, 104 S. Ct. 1211, 79 L. Ed. 2d 516 (1984), in which the Court severely limited the applicability of Title by narrowly interpreting the \"program or activity\" language of the statute. [8] In so holding, the Court does not agree with Defendant that Hastings v. Hancock, 842 F. Supp. 1315 (D.Kan.1993), compels the opposite result. In Hastings, the plaintiff instituted an action under Title for harassing conduct by the director of a hairstyling school. In a footnote, the Court decided that Meritor dictated that quid pro quo claims and hostile environment claims \"should be treated the same so far as establishing liability on the part of the employer/institution.\" 842 F. Supp. at 1318 n. 2. This Court respectfully disagrees with this interpretation of Meritor. As stated heretofore, the Meritor court implicitly agreed with both the EEOC's view that knowledge of a supervisor's conduct can be imputed to an employer in non-hostile work environment cases and the courts' resulting imposition of strict liability on employers in such cases. 477 U.S. at 70-71, 106 S. Ct. at 2407-08. Nor is the Court persuaded by Defendant's argument that \"academic freedom\" requires a relaxation of the general rule that an employer be held strictly liable for quid pro quo harassment. Academic freedom, while intended to encourage creativity, should never be 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 15/16 used to shield illegal, discriminatory conduct. Any suggestion to the contrary would contravene Congress' intent in enacting Title IX. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 8:56 Kadiki v COM. UNIVERSITY, 892 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Va. 1995) :: Justia 16/16", "7877_102.pdf": "Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: THURSDAY, July 27, 1995 TAG: 9507270069 PAGE: C-4 SOURCE: DATELINE: LENGTH: Medium State official charged with embezzling - The administrative manager of the state Office of Emergency Medical Services has been arrested and charged with stealing a ``substantial amount'' of money from the office. Malcolm R. Nicholls Jr. was arrested Tuesday by the state police at his Chesterfield County home. He was charged with grand larceny and was being held in the Richmond City Jail without bond awaiting a court hearing. An audit by the state Department of Health and the state auditor of public accounts is being done to ascertain the amount of money allegedly missing. Nicholls oversaw the office's estimated $10 million annual budget., which comes from a $2 fee charged every time one renews his or her vehicle registration. The agency licenses and certifies emergency medical service personnel. Twenty-five percent of the money collected on the registration fee is returned to localities for emergency services, including rescue squads. Nicholls also served as treasurer of the Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad, which serves part of south Richmond and a portion of Chesterfield County. - Associated Press Suit over spanking ends in deadlock federal jury was unable to reach a verdict on a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by a Virginia Commonwealth University student against the school. Amna Kadiki, 26, testified in U.S. District Court in Richmond that she was spanked by a biology professor in 1992. Professor Michael L. Fine said the spanking was not sexual in nature, rather a motivational tool to make Kadiki do better in class. The spanking came after Kadiki did poorly on a makeup examination. Fine was not named in the lawsuit, which asked for $850,000 in damages from the school. The six-member jury announced Tuesday evening that it was hopelessly deadlocked. - Associated Press Carjacker sentenced in woman's death - An Arlington County jury sentenced a carjacker to three life terms plus 47 years in prison for the shooting death of a 23-year-old woman accosted in her suburban apartment-complex parking lot. 2/22/25, 8:56 1/2 Antonio Haggins, 23, was found guilty Tuesday of charges stemming from the October 1994 carjacking that left Meredith Miller dead. He faced up to life in prison. Haggins, 23, of Washington, D.C., will be eligible for parole in 20 years. In a taped confession, Haggins said he grabbed the victim, then handed his gun to accomplice David Lee. Lee has pleaded guilty to fatally shooting Miller as she tried to escape. ``It's a relief that this is behind us,'' said Nancy Miller, the woman's mother. ``It will never bring an end to our pain, but at least it will bring some closure.'' Lee, 37, earlier pleaded guilty to first-degree murder in the case and will be sentenced today. - Associated Press by 2/22/25, 8:56 2/2", "7877_103.pdf": "Case Law ( Kadiki v Decision Date 26 July 1995 Docket Number Civ. No. 3:94CV530. Citation 892 F. Supp. 746 Parties Amna KADIKI, Plaintiff, v UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Court U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of Virginia Your World of Legal Intelligence (/) United States | 1-800-335-6202 Document Cited authorities 33 Cited in 19 Precedent Map Related 892 F. Supp. 746 Amna KADIKI, Plaintiff, v UNIVERSITY, Defendant. Civ. No. 3:94CV530. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. June 23, 1995. As Corrected July 26, 1995 Carolyn Pullin Carpenter, Eileen N. Wagner, Carpenter, Woodward & Wagner, Richmond, VA, for plaintiff Amna Kadiki. Paul Joseph Forch, Richard Croswell Kast, Office of Atty. Gen. of Va., David Lee Ross, Jean Freeman Reed, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, for defendant Virginia Commonwealth University MERHIGE, District Judge. Amna Kadiki (\"Plaintiff\") alleges that Virginia Commonwealth University (\"Defendant\") discriminated against her on account of her sex in violation of Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1681 et seq. ( (\"Title IX\"). Plaintiff has moved for partial summary uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 judgment and Defendant has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1331 ( 945135835) and 1343 ( I. Plaintiff is a former student of Defendant Virginia Commonwealth University. As a student, Plaintiff enrolled in Biology 110, a course instructed by Associate Professor Michael Fine. On August 13, 1992, Plaintiff took a make-up biology examination, which Fine immediately evaluated. After reviewing the examination, Fine indicated that Plaintiff performed unsatisfactorily and that he would review the examination with her. The two met alone in Fine's office. After reviewing Plaintiff's performance, it is undisputed that Fine placed Plaintiff over his knees and spanked her repeatedly with his hand because her score fell below a previously agreed-upon level. Complaint \u00b6 14; Mem. in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment at 3; Fine Dep. at 62-68. The parties also agree that Fine told Plaintiff that she could retake the same examination the next day, but that she should bring a hairbrush with her and be prepared for another spanking if she did not achieve or exceed a certain score. Complaint \u00b6 13; Plaintiff Aff. \u00b6 6; Mem. in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment at 4; see Fine Dep. at 155. Fine purportedly told Plaintiff that her spanking would be \"worse\" the second time around. Plaintiff Dep. at 25. After the incident, Plaintiff sought medical care for a sore buttocks. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Summary Judgment, Ex. A-1. The same afternoon, Plaintiff's friend, Michael Casanovas, telephoned Fine in Plaintiff's defense. Plaintiff alleges that Fine offered her, through Casanovas, a grade of \"A\" in Biology 110 if she first spoke with Fine before complaining of the spanking incident. Casanovas Aff. \u00b6 9. Defendant, on the other hand, states that it was Casanovas who asked Fine to give Plaintiff a grade of \"C\" and bring the matter to an end. Fine Dep. at 76. Defendant also denies that Fine offered Plaintiff an \"A\" grade. See id. at 77. Plaintiff soon commenced criminal and administrative proceedings against Fine. The criminal charges resulted in Fine's arrest and a November, 1992 conviction for misdemeanor assault. The administrative proceedings, which Plaintiff initiated by meeting with Dean of Students William Duvall, consisted of filing a charge with Dr. David Hiley, Dean of the College of Humanities & Sciences under Defendant's \"Rules and Procedures\" manual. After an investigation, Hiley concluded that Plaintiff's charges were valid and that Fine's actions were unprofessional, inappropriate and unacceptable. Complaint, Ex. B, Hiley Letter. Accordingly, Hiley placed Fine on probation, directed him to perform community service and recommended that he seek professional counseling. Id.; Mem. in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment at 8.1 Soon after the aforementioned proceedings had been initiated, Associate Professor of Biology Jennifer Stewart, a colleague of Fine's, urged Plaintiff to withdraw the criminal charge on the basis, inter alia, that Fine is \"sensitive to the rights of women\" and would neither disrespect women nor harass female students. Complaint, Ex. C, Stewart Letter. Plaintiff suggests that Defendant's officials asked Stewart to write this letter in an effort to resolve the situation. Defendant, however, indicates that Stewart wrote the letter without any encouragement from Defendant's officials. From these allegations, Plaintiff pleads three causes of action under Title IX. First, she claims that Defendant created a hostile environment by subjecting her to unwelcome touching \u2014 the spanking. Second, plaintiff alleges quid pro quo harassment in that Fine (1) through a conversation with Casanovas, allegedly offered her an \"A\" grade in exchange for delaying or refraining from bringing charges against him, and (2) conditioned the retaking of the examination on a possible second spanking. Finally, Plaintiff claims that Defendant harassed and retaliated against her by pressuring her to withdraw the criminal charges through Professor Stewart's letter.2 uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment on two issues. She first moves the Court to conclude that Fine's request that Plaintiff bring a hairbrush to the re-examination and subject herself to a possible second spanking constitutes an incident of quid pro quo harassment. Plaintiff also argues that Defendant is absolutely liable for any incidents of quid pro quo harassment. Defendant, on the other hand, moves for summary judgment as to all issues. II. Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs motions for summary judgment. F.R.Civ.P. 56. Summary judgment is appropriate where parties do not dispute material facts that might affect the outcome of an action. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ( Under Rule 56, the movant bears the burden of proving the absence of any genuine issues of material fact, and the Court must view the facts and any justifiable and legitimate inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Id. at 248, 255-56, 106 S.Ct. at 2510, 2513-14 ( law.vlex.com/vid/anderson-v-liberty-lobby-891819950); Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp., 759 F.2d 355, 364 (4th Cir.1985) ( Felty v. Graves-Humphreys Co., 818 F.2d 1126, 1128 (4th Cir.1987) ( humphreys-891322893). Once the movant has met this burden, and a properly supported motion is before the Court, a nonmoving party, who will bear the burden of proof at trial on a dispositive issue, may not rest upon mere belief or conjecture, or the allegations and denials contained in his pleadings. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2553, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986) ( law.vlex.com/vid/celotex-corporation-v-catrett-892487658). Rather, the non-moving party must set forth specific facts with affidavits, depositions, interrogatories or other evidence to show a genuine issue for trial. Id. ( III. A. Applicable standards in a Title case Title prohibits sex discrimination against students and employees of educational institutions that receive federal funds: \"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal funds.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a) ( This statute carries an implied private right of action, Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 99 S.Ct. 1946, 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ( and thus permits students to recover damages for discriminatory conduct engaged in by their professors. Franklin v. Gwinnett County Pub. Sch., 503 U.S. 60, 75-76, 112 S.Ct. 1028, 1037-38, 117 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992) ( While the Supreme Court has not expressly addressed whether Title actions are governed by Title standards, Franklin, 503 U.S. at 65 n. 4, 112 S.Ct. at 1032 n. 4 ( gwinnett-county-887617689), many lower courts have explicitly turned to Title and the broad body of related jurisprudence for guidance in Title cases, at least in the employment discrimination context. E.g., Preston v. Comm'w of Va. ex rel. New River Community College, 31 F.3d 203, 207 (4th Cir.1994) ( Roberts v. Colo. State Bd. of Agric., 998 F.2d 824, 832 (10th Cir.) ( cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 580, 126 L.Ed.2d 478 (1993) (same); Lipsett v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 896-97 (1st Cir.1988) ( (same). Moreover, the Franklin ( court indicated that the overriding principle of Title VII, i.e., the elimination of discriminatory treatment, intimidation and scorn, should extend to Title actions brought by students (as opposed to employees). Specifically, in Franklin ( respondent school and the United States argued that damages were an inappropriate remedy because Title was enacted under Congress' Spending Clause power. 503 U.S. at 74, 112 S.Ct. at 1037 ( uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 To continue reading Request your trial law.vlex.com/vid/franklin-v-gwinnett-county-887617689). The Supreme Court disagreed on the rationale that intentional sex discrimination does not raise the concern that the entity receiving federal funds lacks notice that it will be liable for an award of damages. Id. ( county-887617689) (citing Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 17, 101 S.Ct. 1531, 1539-40, 67 L.Ed.2d 694 (1981) ( The Court, quoting Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986) ( continued: Unquestionably, Title placed on the Gwinnett County Public Schools the duty not to discriminate on the basis of sex, and \"when a supervisor sexually harasses a subordinate because of the subordinate's sex, that supervisor `discriminates' on the basis of sex.\" We believe the same rule should apply when a teacher sexually harasses and abuses a student. Congress surely did not intend for federal monies to be expended to support the intentional actions it sought by statute to proscribe. Franklin, 503 U.S. at 75, 112 S.Ct. at 1037 ( 887617689) (quoting Meritor, 477 U.S. at 64, 106 S.Ct. at 2404 ( savings-bank-fsb-888874905)). Finally, the Supreme Court has admonished that Title should be given \"a sweep as broad as its language.\" North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 521, 102 S.Ct. 1912, 1918, 72 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982) ( On this basis, this Court concludes that Title standards and the uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 9 cases Search in 9 citing cases \uf014 Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ( law.vlex.com/vid/brzonkala-v-virginia-polytechnic-887252674) United States U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Fourth Circuit December 23, 1997 ...(D.D.C.1996) (same); Bosley v. Kearney R-1 School Dist., 904 F.Supp. 1006, 1021-22 (W.D.Mo.1995) (same); Kadiki v. Virginia Commonwealth Univ., 892 F.Supp. 746, 749-50 (E.D.Va.1995) (same); Ward v. Johns Hopkins Univ., 861 F.Supp. 367, 374 (D.Md.1994) Virginia Tech concedes that Brzonkala h...... Does v. Covington County School Bd. of Educ. ( county-894802786) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Middle District of Alabama May 10, 1996 ...for quid pro quo harassment), see Murray v. New York Univ. College of Dentistry, 57 F.3d 243 (2d Cir.1995); Kadiki v. Virginia Commonwealth Univ., 892 F.Supp. 746 (E.D.Va.1995); Hastings v. Hancock, 842 F.Supp. 1315 (D.Kan.1993); Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified Sch. Dist., 830 F.Supp. 1288 ...... Smith v. Metropolitan School Dist. Perry Tp. ( school-894342687) United States U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Seventh Circuit December 16, 1997 ...in Franklin was aware of the sexual harassment against one of its students and did nothing to stop it). Kadiki v. Virginia Comm. Univ., 892 F.Supp. 746, 749 (E.D.Va.1995) (noting that the Supreme Court in Franklin did not address whether Title actions are governed by Title standards)...... Canutillo Independent School Dist. v. Leija, 95-50791 ( independent-school-dist-885766814) United States U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Fifth Circuit November 27, 1996 ...v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 901 (1st Cir.1988 Notice N-915-050, March 1990, at 21; Kadiki v. Virginia Commonwealth Univ., 892 F.Supp. 746, 752 (E.D.Va.1995). Under agency principles if a teacher or other employee uses the authority he or she is given (e.g., to assign grade...... Request a trial to view additional results uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 1-800-335-6202 Terms of use ( \u00a92025 vLex.com All rights reserved uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041"} |
7,220 | Paris Dennard | Arizona State University | [
"7220_101.pdf",
"7220_102.pdf",
"7220_103.pdf",
"7220_104.pdf",
"7220_105.pdf",
"7220_106.pdf",
"7220_107.pdf"
] | {"7220_101.pdf": "Home > News Aug 23, 2018 10:24am Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Over Sexual Misconduct Report By Erin Nyren Sipa via 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 1/14 has suspended contributor Paris Dennard, Variety has confirmed. Dennard, a reliably pro-Trump contributor on CNN, was the subject of a Wednesday report by the Washington Post, which revealed he had been fired by Arizona State University four years ago for alleged sexual harassment. According to the report, Dennard was accused of \u201cmaking sexually explicit comments and gestures toward women, according to documents and a university official.\u201d \u201cWe are aware of reports of accusations against Paris Dennard,\u201d a spokesperson said in a statement. \u201cWe are suspending Paris, effective immediately, while \u200ewe look into the allegations.\u201d According to a university report obtained by the Post, Dennard acted inappropriately with a recent graduate of who worked for him at the time. He told her he wanted to have sex with her, \u201cpretended to unzip his pants in her presence, tried to get her to sit on his lap, and made masturbatory gestures At the time, Dennard was working as an events director for ASU\u2019s McCain Institute for International Leadership. He had worked for George W. Bush\u2019s White House in the past. Popular on Variety 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 2/14 More from Variety On Monday, Trump called him \u201cwonderful\u201d for his debate with Phillip Mudd, a former counterterrorism official with the and the FBI. \u201cDennard destroyed him,\u201d wrote Trump. Dennard was a surrogate for Trump during his campaign and is now a member of the President\u2019s Commission on White House Fellowships. In emails with the Post, Dennard said cannot comment on items have never seen regarding allegations still believe to be false. This is sadly another politically motivated attempt to besmirch my character, and shame me into silence for my support of President Trump and the GOP.\u201d Just watched former Intelligence Official Phillip Mudd become totally unglued and weird while debating wonderful over Brennan\u2019s Security Clearance. Dennard destroyed him but Mudd is in no mental condition to have such a Clearance. Should be REVOKED? @seanhannity \u2014 Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 21, 2018 Read More About 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 3/14 Awards Winner Predictions: Timoth\u00e9e Chalamet, Demi Moore and More in Battle of Breakouts Vs. Veterans Gen Video Limbo: Why Studios Are Still Uncertain Oscars: Has Netflix Finally Found Its Best Picture Winner? Could Fernanda Torres Pull Off an Upset? And What About \u2018Wicked\u2019? 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 4/14 Best Picture Battle: Six Movies Have a Narrow Path to Winning, From Complete Unknown\u2019 to \u2018The Brutalist\u2019 Switch 2 Could Bring Gaming Consoles\u2019 Reckoning How Oscar-Nominated Teams Created Alien Animatronics, Wicked Worlds and More Most Popular Daniel Craig Reacts to Amazon\u2019s James Bond Takeover: \u2018My Respect\u2019 for Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson Remains \u2018Undiminished\u2026 Phil Collins Says He\u2019s Been \u2018Sick Mean, Very Sick,\u2019 Describing His Disinterest in Recording Since Genesis\u2019 Final Tour George Clooney Says Biden \u2018Was Terrible at Explaining\u2019 the World Economy, Warns of News Settling With Trump: \u2018It Has a Chilling Effect on the\u2026 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 5/14 Matt Gaetz Takes Aim at Alan Ritchson After \u2018Reacher\u2019 Star Called Him a \u2018Motherf\u2014er\u2019: \u2018He's Trying to Get Hollywood Attention but Not Just With\u2026 Blake Lively\u2019s Publicist Says She Didn\u2019t Defame Justin Baldoni When She Wrote \u2018The Whole Cast Hates Him\u2019 \u2018Avatar\u2019 Sequel Series \u2018Seven Havens\u2019 Ordered at Nickelodeon, Set After \u2018Legend of Korra\u2019 \u20189-1-1: Nashville\u2019 Ordered to Series at Sean \u2018Diddy\u2019 Combs\u2019 Attorney Files Motion to Withdraw From Case Tom Holland\u2019s \u2018Spider-Man 4\u2019 Gets New July 2026 Release, Moves Two Weeks Out From Christopher Nolan\u2019s \u2018The Odyssey\u2026 Angela Bassett Says Was Deserving\u2019 of the Oscar for \u2018Black Panther 2\u2019 After Put in the Time\u2019 and Good Work Thought It Was a Given\u2026 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 6/14 Must Read Film No Time to Delay: Why Amazon Took Control of James Bond as Next 007 Movie Remains in Limbo 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 7/14 Why Dana Carvey, Bill Hader and More \u2018SNL\u2019 Legends Skipped 50th Anniversary Show Film Charles Burnett on His Soaring Romance 'The Annihilation of Fish,' Finally Released After 25 Years in Distribution Hell Film 8 Takeaways From Winners: From Mikey Madison\u2019s Surprise Best Actress Win to \u2018Conclave\u2019 and Real Pain\u2019 Beating \u2018Anora\u2026 Film Berlin Goes Bananas for Robert Pattinson and His Clones in Bong Joon Ho\u2019s \u2018Mickey 17\u2019 Sign Up for Variety Newsletters Enter Your Email Address Sign Up By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. // This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply Variety Confidential 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 8/14 Variety and iHeartRadio Podcast More From Our Brands Rolling Stone 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 9/14 Lenderman Reveals He\u2019ll No Longer Tour With Wednesday, But Will Still Record With Band Robb Report Will Smith, Tom Brady, and More A-Listers Now Own Electric Boat Racing Teams. Can E1 Break Through? 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 10/14 Sportico 4 Nations Final Scares Up \u2018Tariff-ic\u2019 Ratings as 9.3M Viewers Tune In 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 11/14 The Best Loofahs and Body Scrubbers, According to Dermatologists 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 12/14 TVLine Doctor Who Season 15 Casts Slow Horses\u2019 Christopher Chung \u2014 Get Details Variety Legal Variety Magazine VIP+ Connect The Business of Entertainment 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 13/14 Have a News Tip? Let us know Variety is a part of Penske Media Corporation. \u00a9 2025 Variety Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Variety and the Flying logos are trademarks of Variety Media 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Paris Dennard 14/14", "7220_102.pdf": "fires national spokesperson Paris Dennard had been serving as the Republican National Committee\u2019s national spokesman and director of Black media affairs for the committee. Paris Dennard poses for a photo in front of a U.S. flag before the opening general session of Conservative Political Action Conference on July 9, 2021, in Dallas Otero Photo By 08/26/2022 02:58 Create Up To Three E-Labels regulation compliance with Bottlebooks Bottlebooks Book Now \ue908 2/22/25, 8:57 fires national spokesperson 1/4 The Republican National Committee has fired Paris Dennard as its national spokesman, according to two people familiar with the move. Dennard had been serving as a national spokesman and director of Black media affairs for the committee. He started working for the in March 2020. Advertisement \u201cParis Dennard no longer works for the RNC. We don\u2019t comment on personnel matters chief of staff Mike Reed said in a statement. One person familiar with the firing said it took place earlier this week. Dennard did not respond to a request for comment. Dennard, a veteran of the George W. Bush White House, was a high-profile on- air surrogate for former President Donald Trump. Dennard served on Trump\u2019s commission on White House Fellowships, and during the 2020 campaign he was on the advisory board of Black Voices for Trump, an initiative aimed at helping the former president expand his share of the Black vote. In 2018, the Washington Post reported that, four years earlier, Dennard had been fired from his post at Arizona State University over accusations of sexual misconduct. Following the report suspended Dennard from his role as a contributor at the network, saying at the time it was \u201clook[ing] into the allegations.\u201d Dennard \u2014 who told the Post that the allegations were \u201cfalse\u201d \u2014 and parted ways in late 2018 COMMITTEE, 2022 2/22/25, 8:57 fires national spokesperson 2/4 West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government Your guide to Donald Trump\u2019s unprecedented overhaul of the federal government. By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the bottom of the email or by contacting us here. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply Your Email Employer Job Title Which car has priority? 80% answer incorrectly! Tips and Tricks [Pics] 10 Food That Unclog Arteries (Most People Ignore) TravelSent [Pics] This Is Common in Dubai, And It Happens Every\u2026 Novelodge [Pics] Always Put a Plastic Bottle on Your Tires when\u2026 Cleverst About Us Advertising Breaking News Alerts Careers 2/22/25, 8:57 fires national spokesperson 3/4 Credit Card Payments Digital Edition Feedback Headlines Photos Press Print Subscriptions Request Correction Write For Us Site Map Terms of Service Privacy Policy \u00a9 2025 2/22/25, 8:57 fires national spokesperson 4/4", "7220_103.pdf": "Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report is suspending pro-Trump contributor Paris Dennard as it investigates allegations of misconduct first surfaced in a Washington Post story 22, 2018 7:21PM is suspending pro-Trump contributor Paris Dennard as it investigates allegations of misconduct first surfaced in a Washington Post story Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 1/10 The Post on Wednesday night reported that Dennard was fired from a previous job at Arizona State University for \u201cmaking sexually explicit comments and gestures toward women, according to documents and a university official.\u201d Following publication of the report, The Hollywood Reporter reached out to to determine Dennard\u2019s status. \u201cWe are aware of reports of accusations against Paris Dennard,\u201d a network spokesperson said. \u201cWe are suspending Paris, effective immediately, while \u200ewe look into the allegations Related Stories 'The Apprentice' Director Ali Abbasi Exits Amid Report of Alleged Groping Incident According to a report conducted by the university and obtained by the newspaper, Dennard acted inappropriately with a recent college graduate under his employ. He \u201cpretended to unzip his pants in her presence, tried to get her to sit on his lap, and made masturbatory gestures,\u201d according to the report. Dennard, who once worked for George W. Bush\u2019s White House, had been working for ASU\u2019s McCain Institute for International Leadership reliable defender of President Donald Trump on CNN\u2019s airwaves, he was lauded by Trump as \u201cwonderful\u201d on Monday night for his combativeness with presidential critic Philip Mudd during a segment late last week has cycled through pro-Trump conservative contributors over the last year or so. Last August, the network fired Jeffrey Lord for using a Nazi salute on Twitter, and in January parted ways with Ed Martin for unstated Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 2/10 Sign up for news straight to your inbox every day \u2018Yellowjackets\u2019 Boss Jonathan Lisco Explains That Wild Hallucination Sequence Menendez Brothers Are Now \u201cGrateful\u201d for Ryan Murphy\u2019s \u2018Monsters: The Lyle And Erik Menendez Story \u2018Suits LA\u2019 Review: Stephen Amell Flounders in NBC\u2019s Tonally Confused, Narratively Jumbled Legal Drama Where to Watch \u2018Yellowstone\u2019 Prequel Series \u20181923\u2019 Online reasons that coincided with impolite remarks he made on his radio show about his colleagues. The network\u2019s decision to suspend Dennard was widely hailed by viewers on social media on Wednesday night Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 3/10 \u2018High Potential\u2019 Ends Season With Series-Best Ratings \u2018Suits\u2019 Creator on Bringing Back Harvey Specter for \u2018Suits LA,\u2019 With More Original Stars Likely to Return The Garden Goes Global: Celeb-Loved Brand Flamingo Estate Launches \u2018Sensorial\u2019 Partnership with Marriott How to Recreate Netflix Bites, the Streamer\u2019s Hot New Vegas Restaurant, at Home The Best Waterproof Mascaras Loved by Hollywood Beauty Pros Running List of \u2018The White Lotus\u2019 Brand Collabs Inspired by Season Three Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 4/10 Lively vs. Baldoni Has Already \u201cChanged Hollywood Publicity Forever Sign up for news straight to your inbox every day By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. // This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 5/10 Justin Baldoni\u2019s Leap of Faith Fernanda Torres Has Already Won Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 6/10 Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 7/10 1. Anna Kendrick Made Jaws Drop With Her Daring Look At the Nominees Party Amid Simple Favor Drama 2. Blink-182 Cofounder Mark Hoppus to Sell $5 M. Banksy Painting at Sotheby's in London 3. Irv Gotti's Funeral: Ja Rule And Other Loved Ones Mourn Late Mogul At Queens Service 4 May Have Solved All-Star Game Dilemma With 4 Nations Face-Off Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 8/10 The Best Yoga Mats for Any Practice, According to Instructors 11 Subscriber Support The Hollywood Reporter Legal Follow Us Have a Tip? Send us a tip using our anonymous form Newsletter Sign Up Enter Your Email By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. // This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 9/10 The Hollywood Reporter is a part of Penske Media Corporation. \u00a9 2025 The Hollywood Reporter, LLC. All Rights Reserved is a registered trademark of The Hollywood Reporter, LLC. Powered by WordPress.com Ad Loading 00:00 01:28 2/22/25, 8:57 Suspends Contributor Paris Dennard Following Sexual Misconduct Report 10/10", "7220_104.pdf": "Paris Dennard, conservative commentator, wants nearly $10M for 'leaked investigation Published 6:00 a.m April 2, 2019 Updated 7:09 a.m April 2, 2019 Conservative political commentator Paris Dennard claims Arizona State University intentionally released an investigation into misconduct to damage his reputation, and he wants $9.9 million to settle the dispute with the school. The release of a 2014 report into alleged sexual comments in the workplace led to lost wages and future opportunities for Dennard, according to a notice of claim filed in February. The notice, a precursor to a lawsuit, was sent to the Arizona Board of Regents, which oversees ASU. The notice was first reported by The Yellow Sheet, a political newsletter, on Friday. Dennard was the subject of a Washington Post story last year that detailed an investigation by into claims of sexual harassment when Dennard was employed by ASU's McCain Institute for International Leadership from 2013 to 2015. The story cites an anonymous university official who confirmed the report was authentic, and an official who said Dennard was \"involuntarily separated\" from the school. In the notice, Dennard says the university found he did not violate harassment policies, but did violate employee conduct rules and displayed a \"lack of professionalism.\" Dennard's notice of claim backs up that he was asked to leave his job after the investigation in what was deemed an \"involuntary separation.\" Investigations into misconduct aren't typically released in full by the university, though parts of the investigation, like determinations and summaries, are subject to public records laws. Rachel Leingang The Republic | azcentral.com 2/22/25, 8:57 Paris Dennard wants almost $10M settlement for 'leaked investigation 1/4 When the investigation ended, Dennard was informed by that the university would not publicly release the full report, the notice states. But, Dennard's notice of claim alleges, someone affiliated with leaked the entire document to the Post. It's not clear from the Post's story how the newspaper obtained the report, or whether played any role in its release. The Republic did not obtain a copy of the investigation, but has requested copies of any investigative documents that can be publicly released spokesman Bret Hovell said the university is \"not able to answer any questions related to pending or threatened litigation.\" Dennard is a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump's policies. In one instance, just days before the Post story, Trump praised Dennard on Twitter, calling him \"wonderful.\" Allegations of misconduct at McCain Institute The investigation included allegations from two female employees. In one instance, Dennard allegedly told a subordinate that he wanted to have sex with her and \"pretended to unzip his pants in her presence, tried to get her to sit on his lap, and made masturbatory gestures,\" according to the Post. The report also included an allegation that Dennard once touched a female employee's \"neck with his tongue\" and came up behind her at a work event and \"whispered in her ear that he wanted to \u2018f---\u2019 her,\" the Post reported. The notice of claim references parts of the story that tie to ASU, including the anonymous university official and other employees who may have discussed the report with the journalist. \"These statements strongly suggest that intentionally disclosed the report (and commented on it) in order publicly to smear and harm Mr. Dennard,\" Dennard's attorney, Timothy La Sota, wrote. 2/22/25, 8:57 Paris Dennard wants almost $10M settlement for 'leaked investigation 2/4 Dennard lost jobs after story Dennard faced \"immediate and severe\" damage after the story published, La Sota claimed. Before the allegations of harassment were publicly reported, he worked as a commentator for and NPR's \"Here and Now\" and as a contributing writer for The Hill. After the story, his affiliations with these organizations were dropped. The leaked report and comments from officials led Dennard to \"became the subject of scrutiny and vitriolic and highly damaging criticism on social and print media.\" The first nine pages of Google results for Dennard's name now bring up the allegations, La Sota wrote. At the time of the story, Dennard's career was on the rise, the claim says, but professional opportunities he was pursuing at the time the story published \"dried up.\" Dennard's family also was affected. Brophy College Preparatory, where Dennard graduated from in 2000, sent an email to its staff and students regarding the story, asking people not to comment on it to the media. \"This caused tremendous embarrassment to Mr. Dennard and his family,\" La Sota wrote. Dennard seeks almost $10 million La Sota previously served the regents and President Michael Crow with a notice of claim on the matter in December 2018, but did not receive a response. On Feb. 9, La Sota filed an amended notice of claim, which was substantively the same as the first notice. The regents have 60 days to to resolve the matter, La Sota said, before a lawsuit can be filed. The university violated Dennard's privacy rights, La Sota claimed, citing state laws and codes that prevent the release of personnel information intentionally inflicted emotional distress on Dennard, La Sota claimed. The claim arrived at $9.9 million in damages, including $7.7 million in lost future wages, $1 million for emotional distress, and costs incurred for 10 years of reputation management, attorneys and publicists of $10,000 per month. Reach reporter Rachel Leingang by email at [email protected] or by phone at 602-444-8157, or find her on Twitter and Facebook. 2/22/25, 8:57 Paris Dennard wants almost $10M settlement for 'leaked investigation 3/4 Support local journalism. Subscribe to azcentral.com today. 2/22/25, 8:57 Paris Dennard wants almost $10M settlement for 'leaked investigation 4/4", "7220_105.pdf": "(AP) \u2014 Political commentator Paris Dennard is seeking nearly $10 million from Arizona State University, claiming it intentionally released the results of an investigation into sexual misconduct allegations to damage his reputation. An attorney for Dennard filed an amended notice of claim \u2014 a precursor to a lawsuit \u2014 in February, claiming the release of the 2014 investigative report caused lost wages and opportunities, the Arizona Republic reported Tuesday. University spokesman Bret Hovell said the university cannot comment on pending or threatened litigation. Dennard was employed by the university\u2019s McCain Institute for International Leadership from 2013 to 2015. The Washington Post reported last year on the investigation into the allegations by two women. The story cited an anonymous university official who confirmed the investigative report. It is not clear how the newspaper obtained the documents. Dennard claims university officials told him the full report would not be released to the public. Dennard said the university determined he did not violate harassment policies, but he did violate employee conduct rules and displayed a \u201clack of professionalism,\u201d according to the notice. Dennard was subject to \u201cimmediate and severe\u201d damage after the story was published, his attorney, Timothy La Sota, wrote. Before the allegations were reported, Dennard worked as a commentator for and and as a contributing writer for The Hill. His affiliations with these news organizations were dropped following the reporting, according to the notice. Commentator seeks $10M from after misconduct report Updated 4:50 CST, April 2, 2019 Maine governor Ind vs Pak Postal Service Luigi draws crowd Jerry Butler dies 2/22/25, 8:57 Commentator seeks $10M from after misconduct report News 1/3 \u201cThis caused tremendous embarrassment to Mr. Dennard and his family,\u201d La Sota wrote. The Arizona Board of Regents, which oversees the university, has 60 days to resolve the claims before a lawsuit can be filed, La Sota said. ___ Information from: The Arizona Republic, 2/22/25, 8:57 Commentator seeks $10M from after misconduct report News 2/3 Federal judge allows Trump\u2019s mass firings of federal workers to move forward Steve Bannon is accused of doing a straight-arm Nazi salute at but says it was just \u2018a wave\u2019 Trump\u2019s attempts to denigrate Zelenskyy have led to a surge in Ukrainian unity Judge largely blocks Trump\u2019s executive orders ending federal support for programs Dow falls nearly 750 points and stocks tumble as businesses and consumers worry about tariffs 1 2 3 4 5 2/22/25, 8:57 Commentator seeks $10M from after misconduct report News 3/3", "7220_106.pdf": "+ News Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface By Christianna Silva August 23, 2018, 10:45am Share: 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 1/11 has suspended conservative commentator Paris Dennard, who President Trump called \u201cwonderful,\u201d after a report revealed he was fired from Arizona State University in 2015 for sexual misconduct. According to the Washington Post, Dennard told a recent graduate that he wanted to have sex with her while licking her neck during an event and \u201cpretended to unzip his pants in her presence, tried to get her to sit on his lap, and made masturbatory gestures\u201d when he worked as an events director at ASU\u2019s McCain Institute for International Leadership, according to a university report obtained by the Post 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 2/11 The investigation, which tracks Dennard\u2019s relationship with two women he sexually harassed between 2013 and 2014, alleges that Dennard would throw things at one woman and would frequently stare at her breasts. When he tried to move her shirt, he said, \u201cDon\u2019t worry, I\u2019ve already seen it.\u201d According to the report obtained by the Post, he admitted to touching one woman\u2019s \u201cneck with his tongue\u201d and came up behind another woman during an event and \u201cwhispered in her ear that he wanted to \u2018f\u2014\u2019 her.\u201d According to the report, Dennard \u201cengaged in much of this behavior in the workplace and/or during work events. Such conduct, of course, is inappropriate . . How Meta Fails to Stop Predators | Informer 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 3/11 . unprofessional and unbecoming of a university employee, and in violation of policy.\u201d As a result, he was placed on administrative leave in fall 2014 and fired in 2015 cannot comment on items have never seen regarding allegations still believe to be false,\u201d Dennard told The Post. \u201cThis is sadly another politically motivated attempt to besmirch my character, and shame me into silence for my support of President Trump and the GOP.\u201d Dennard, who\u2019s also written opinion pieces for the Hill and appeared on NPR\u2019s \u201cHere and Now,\u201d was an early and outspoken supporter of Trump. On his website, 36-year-old Dennard says he was an \u201cofficial media surrogate for the victorious Donald J. Trump for President Campaign.\u201d In December, Trump appointed him to the Commission on White House Fellowships and called him a \u201ckey addition\u201d to the Trump administration. On Monday, Trump praised Dennard for accusing officials of profiting from their security clearances. \u201cJust watched former Intelligence Official Phillip Mudd become totally unglued and weird while debating wonderful over Brennan\u2019s Security Clearance,\u201d Trump tweeted. \u201cDennard destroyed him but Mudd is in no mental condition to have such a Clearance.\u201d 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 4/11 And that wasn\u2019t the first time Trump threw his support behind Dennard. During a February 2017 Black History Month Listening Session, Trump said Dennard was \u201cdoing an amazing job in a very hostile community.\u201d Cover: Paris Dennard commentator, on the red carpet for \u201cThe State of Black America\u201d town hall taping, at the Howard Theatre on May 3, 2017 in Washington. (Photo by Cheriss May) (Sipa via Images) Tagged Share: Just watched former Intelligence Official Phillip Mudd become totally unglued and weird while debating wonderful over Brennan\u2019s Security Clearance. Dennard destroyed him but Mudd is in no mental condition to have such a Clearance. Should be REVOKED? @seanhannity \u2014 Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 21, 2018 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 5/11 NEWSLETTER. Your email... Subscribe By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content. 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 6/11 The Rock Announces WrestleMania 42 Location on SmackDown 11 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 7/11 iPhone 16e Versus iPhone 3. How Much Did Apple\u2019s \u2018Budget\u2019 iPhone Really Change Waypoint Weekend Episode 15: One of These Things Is Like the Others The MacBook Air M4\u2019s Performance Scores Just Leaked\u2014It\u2019s Fast Our Lady Peace Performed Chris Benoit\u2019s Entrance Theme for First Time in 2 Decades Police Just Found a Drug- Smuggling Tunnel Connecting Spain and Morocco 14 14 14 14 14 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 8/11 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 9/11 Volcano Frontman Jeremy Damron Undergoing Emergency \u2018Invasive Spine Surgery Diddy\u2019s Lawyer Abruptly Quits Sex Trafficking Case Elon Musk and His Grok 3 Model Is Apparently Advanced Beyond Measure \u2014 And There\u2019s Something Horribly Depressing About That So Many People Were up Shaking They Rat in \u2018Ratshaker\u2019 That the Devs Had to Release a \u201dDirectors Cut\u201d 14 14 14 17 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 10/11 \u00a9 2025 2/22/25, 8:57 Pro-Trump commentator Paris Dennard suspended by after sexual misconduct allegations surface 11/11", "7220_107.pdf": "\uf002 \uf26c Watch Now Quick links 9 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report \uf09a\ue61b\uf0e0 undefined undefined Menu 2/22/25, 8:58 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report 1/5 By: Associated Press Posted 1:47 PM, Apr 02, 2019 and last updated 1:47 PM, Apr 02, 2019 (AP) - Political commentator Paris Dennard is seeking nearly $10 million from Arizona State University, claiming it intentionally released an investigation into sexual misconduct allegations to damage his reputation. The Arizona Republic reported Tuesday that an attorney for Dennard filed an amended notice of claim - a precursor to a lawsuit - in February, claiming the release of the 2014 report caused lost wages and future opportunities. Dennard was previously employed by the university's McCain Institute for International Leadership. The Washington Post had reported on the investigation into the allegations in August 2018, citing an anonymous university official. Dennard's attorney, Timothy La Sota, wrote that his client faced \"immediate and severe\" damage after the story was published. University spokesman Bret Hovell says the university cannot comment on pending or threatened litigation. Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Report a typo Sign up for the Headlines Newsletter and receive up to date information. E-mail Submit 2/22/25, 8:58 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report 2/5 Ellen DeGeneres Is Saying Goodbye to the U.S.\u2014and Likely Her Hobby Flipping Houses Paid Content: Mansion Global Tucson Police investigate body found near Tucson 9 Tucson News Trump backs direct payments to Americans from 9 Tucson News Tucson middle school student dies from fentanyl overdose 9 Tucson News 2/22/25, 8:58 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report 3/5 Online Jobs in from Pakistan (Salaries Will Surprise You) Paid Content: Search Ads 2/22/25, 8:58 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report 4/5 News Weather Traffic You Ask. We Investigate.\u2122 Support Sitemap Do Not Sell My Info Privacy Policy Privacy Center Journalism Ethics Guidelines Terms of Use Careers Public File Public File Application Public File Contact Accessibility Statement Scripps Media Trust Center Closed Captioning Contact Scripps Local Media \u00a9 2025 Scripps Media, Inc Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way 2/22/25, 8:58 Paris Dennard seeks $10M from after misconduct report 5/5"} |
7,931 | John Coleman Darnell | Yale University | [
"7931_101.pdf",
"7931_102.pdf",
"7931_103.pdf",
"7931_104.pdf",
"7931_105.pdf"
] | {"7931_101.pdf": "Donate | Read the Print Edition Subscribe | Join the 22, 2025 Darnell resigns as dept chair following relationship with student | 9:23 10, 2013 Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Chair John Darnell resigned as chair and agreed to a one-year suspension from the Yale faculty after engaging in several violations of University policy, including maintaining an intimate relationship with a student under his direct supervision, Darnell said in an email sent to the department Tuesday afternoon. Darnell\u2019s other violations consisted of participating in the review of a faculty member with whom he had an intimate relationship and using his leadership role in Egyptology to cover up his illicit behavior, he wrote in his Tuesday email. Such actions are prohibited by the Yale University Faculty Handbook, which \uf002 2/22/25, 8:59 Darnell resigns as dept chair following relationship with student - Yale Daily News 1/3 states that professors must avoid sexual relationships with students over whom they have \u201cdirect pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities.\u201d \u201c[I] have violated Yale policies and the trust placed in me as a Yale faculty member,\u201d Darnell wrote have failed the University, my colleagues, and my students, and am deeply sorry.\u201d University spokesman Tom Conroy declined to comment beyond Darnell\u2019s notification to his department. Darnell could not be reached for further comment Wednesday night or Thursday morning. In a Tuesday follow-up email to the department, University President Richard Levin said Director of Graduate Studies Eckart Frahm would serve as acting chair for the spring semester while Yale College Dean Mary Miller interviews members of the department to suggest a replacement for the next full term. Levin added that Frahm will assign new faculty advisers to each of the graduate students previously under Darnell\u2019s supervision. Levin apologized to the department for conveying \u201csuch unsettling news trust that faculty, staff, and students alike will pull together to ensure that the department\u2019s educational and research programs move forward,\u201d Levin said. Darnell joined the Yale faculty as an assistant professor in 1998 and became professor of Egyptology in 2005. He has taught courses on \u201cEgypt and Northeast Africa\u201d and \u201cEgyptian Coffin Texts,\u201d and has also served as director of the Yale Egyptological Institute in Egypt. 2/22/25, 8:59 Darnell resigns as dept chair following relationship with student - Yale Daily News 2/3 CO., INC. 202 York Street, New Haven 06511 | (203) 432-2400 Editorial: (203) 432-2418 | [email protected] Business: (203) 432-2424 | [email protected] 2025 2/22/25, 8:59 Darnell resigns as dept chair following relationship with student - Yale Daily News 3/3", "7931_102.pdf": "< Too hot for a cold world of food in the parking lot > This just in On Yale & Yale alumni. Yale staffer reported Darnell relationship By Mark Alden Branch \u201986 | 6:51am February 01 2013 Details in a semiannual report on sexual misconduct complaints released by the university yesterday suggest that it was a Yale staff member who filed a complaint over the alleged years-long sexual relationship between Egyptology professor John Darnell and one of his students. In an e-mail to colleagues on January 8, Darnell admitted to having an intimate relationship with a student under his supervision and to participating in the review of a faculty member with whom he had an intimate relationship. He said he had agreed to step down as chair of the Near East languages and civilizations (NELC) department and to a one-year suspension. The names of complainants and respondents are not included in the report released yesterday, but Graduate School associate dean Pamela Schirmeister \u201980, \u201988PhD, told the Yale Daily News that the complaint against Darnell was included in the report, and the details of one particular entry match those that are known or alleged in the Darnell case. The item, included among complaints made to the university's Title coordinators, reads staff member reported that a male faculty member engaged in a sexual relationship with a female student whom he supervised while she was both an undergraduate and a Graduate & Professional student, in violation of the Policy on Teacher- Student Consensual Relations. The respondent admitted a violation of the consensual relations policy and accepted a one- year suspension without pay.\" In Yale parlance, a \"staff member\" is an employee who is not on the faculty. Yale Daily News/Baobao Zhang 2/22/25, 8:59 Yale staffer reported Darnell relationship | This just in | Yale Alumni Magazine 1/2 Copyright 1937-2015 Yale Alumni Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. The Yale Alumni Magazine and its website were until July 2015 published by Yale Alumni Publications, Inc., an alumni-based nonprofit not run by Yale University. Content published before July 2015 is the responsibility of its editors and third-party users of the website and does not necessarily reflect the views of Yale or its officers. < Too hot for a cold world of food in the parking lot > The comment period has expired. The unnamed staff member's allegation echoes that of Darnell's wife, who accused him in divorce papers of beginning a sexual relationship with Colleen Manassa \u201901, \u201905PhD, when Manassa was an undergraduate majoring in NELC. Manassa went on to get her PhD in the department under Darnell's supervision and was then hired as an assistant professor. She is now an associate professor and the director of undergraduate studies in the department. Anonymous sources have told the Yale Daily News that the faculty member Darnell referred to in his e-mail as Manassa, but this has not been confirmed by Darnell, Manassa, or anyone in the Yale administration. The report, which is the third issued by the provost's office as part of an increased focus on sexual misconduct issues after a Title complaint against the university in 2011, documents 43 new complaints and includes updates on 3 previous complaints. The complaints, which are in various stages of resolution, range from nonconsensual sex and physical assault to inappropriate comments. There were three complaints about personal relationships among staff and/or faculty that were said to have created a \"hostile environment.\" Filed under John Darnell, Colleen Manassa, Title 2/22/25, 8:59 Yale staffer reported Darnell relationship | This just in | Yale Alumni Magazine 2/2", "7931_103.pdf": "Donate | Read the Print Edition Subscribe | Join the 22, 2025 Scandal still strains Egyptology | 2:21 06, 2014 In January 2013, allegations emerged of an affair between Egyptology professor John Darnell and Associate Professor Colleen Manassa \u201901 \u201905 while Manassa was a student under Darnell\u2019s supervision. One year after the scandal, students and faculty in the Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations (NELC) department \u2014 the umbrella department of Yale\u2019s Egyptology program \u2014 are still hurting from the consequences, which include Darnell\u2019s continued suspension from the University and a consequent lack of advising for graduate students in the program. Darnell and Manassa are the only two faculty members in Egyptology at Yale, and Darnell was the only senior professor and advisor in the Egyptology program. One graduate student in the program, who requested to remain anonymous, said graduate research has been \u201cseverely halted\u201d by Darnell\u2019s suspension \uf002 2/22/25, 8:59 Scandal still strains Egyptology - Yale Daily News 1/4 Assyriology Professor Benjamin Foster \u201975 said the University tapped history Professor Joseph Manning to mobilize graduate advising committees to replace Darnell \u2014 often looking to outside scholars for membership in the committees. But the University has not offered financial compensation to these outside advisors and some have declined to assist the Yale students, according to the graduate student. Yale College Dean Mary Miller said Manassa is unable to advise the Egyptology graduate students because she does not have tenure. But Foster said the reason Manassa is not currently advising graduate students has more to do with the \u201csituation of last year.\u201d Foster said the current uncertainty of Egypt\u2019s political climate has further impeded the research of Yale\u2019s Egyptology graduate students, with the department hesitant to send students into a dangerous situation. \u201cIt\u2019s not a place we\u2019re eager to see our students go,\u201d Foster said. \u201cYou don\u2019t want people out in rural Egypt if there\u2019s going to be a revolution.\u201d Since Darnell\u2019s suspension, at least one of the seven graduate students listed on the Egyptology program\u2019s website has dropped out of the program. When news broke of the scandal last year, the University imposed a one-year suspension without pay on Darnell, which meant that the professor would be back on campus this semester. But last semester, University Provost Benjamin Polak extended the sanctions until fall 2014 as a result of an investigation by the University-Wide Committee on Sexual Misconduct. Darnell\u2019s absence has strained Yale\u2019s already-small program in Egyptology, halting the admission of new Egyptology graduate 2/22/25, 8:59 Scandal still strains Egyptology - Yale Daily News 2/4 students until fall 2016 and lowering NELC\u2019s annual admission cap from four to three graduate students. \u201cAt the present time, we\u2019re not taking graduate students in Egyptology, so obviously not doing that well at the moment,\u201d Foster said. James Allen, an Egyptologist at Brown University, said the nine other North American universities that offer Egyptology graduate programs have not benefitted from Yale\u2019s hiatus. Brown\u2019s Egyptology program regularly receives 15 times more applications than it can admit, Allen said, noting that the same figures apply elsewhere. As no graduate program can increase its number of accepted students, Yale\u2019s suspension is not benefitting other graduating programs, but rather limiting the number of slots for aspiring Egyptologists in the United States and Canada. While Allen said Yale\u2019s program has suffered a \u201csetback,\u201d Foy Scalf, an Egyptology graduate student at the University of Chicago, said top- notch research has come out of Yale\u2019s Egyptology program in the past year. Scalf cited a museum exhibit and catalogue produced by Manassa, a book by Darnell and \u201ccompelling\u201d papers at conferences by graduate students Niv Allon and Julia Hsieh as examples of this research. \u201cThe research being produced by the Yale Egyptology department remains among the top of the field,\u201d Scalf said. Still, if he were applying to graduate programs today, Scalf said he would be concerned that the fallout of last year\u2019s scandal could have negative consequences for his future career. Darnell and Manassa could not be reached for comment. There are 10 academic Egyptology programs in North America. 2/22/25, 8:59 Scandal still strains Egyptology - Yale Daily News 3/4 CO., INC. 202 York Street, New Haven 06511 | (203) 432-2400 Editorial: (203) 432-2418 | [email protected] Business: (203) 432-2424 | [email protected] 2025 2/22/25, 8:59 Scandal still strains Egyptology - Yale Daily News 4/4", "7931_104.pdf": "Baobao Zhang/Yale Daily News View full image In what may be an unprecedented move, Yale has publicly suspended a senior faculty member who had an affair with a student under his supervision. The professor, John Darnell, has also resigned as chair of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations (NELC) and stepped aside as director of the Yale Egyptological Institute. Yale officials are saying little about the situation. But the one-year unpaid suspension, which Darnell announced in a January 8 e-mail to colleagues, is a rare public crackdown on sexual misconduct\u2014Yale\u2019s handling of which has come under scrutiny in recent years by students, alumni, and the government. (See \u201cFederal Government Ends Title Investigation,\u201d July/August.) Two senior professors say they have never seen any faculty member suspended in 40-plus years at Yale. In his e-mail to department members, Darnell acknowledged several violations of Yale policy: \u201cmaintaining an intimate relationship with a Yale student, who was under my direct supervision\u201d; \u201cparticipating in the review of a faculty member with whom had an intimate relationship\u201d; and using his \u201cleadership role\u2026 in an effort to ensure that these policy violations would not come to light.\u201d Darnell, who could not be reached for comment, did not name the person involved, and Yale officials will not comment. Anonymous sources told the Yale Daily News that the student was Colleen Manassa \u201901, \u201905PhD, now associate professor of Egyptology. Manassa is not known to be accused of violating any Yale rules. Reached by phone, she says really have no comment on this matter.\u201d Last year, Darnell filed for divorce from his wife, Deborah, a employee and frequent collaborator at the Yale Egyptological Institute. In a publicly available legal response, Deborah Darnell asserts that her husband began an affair with Manassa in 2000. At that time, Manassa was a undergraduate; she went on to get her doctorate under John Darnell\u2019s supervision. The department hired her as an assistant professor in 2006 and promoted her to associate in 2010. On his divorce filing, John Darnell listed as his address a house Manassa purchased in 2011, according to online town land records. Deborah Darnell could not be reached for comment. Knowledge or suspicion of the relationship was widespread within the department, current and former faculty members say. Benjamin Foster \u201975PhD, a professor of Assyriology and former department chair, declines to name Darnell\u2019s romantic partner but confirms that \u201cthe basic situation has been known for a very long time,\u201d because \u201cYale\u2019s a village Professor suspended over affair with student New procedures take effect. By Carole Bass | Mar/Apr 2013 2/22/25, 8:59 Professor suspended over affair with student | Light & Verity | Yale Alumni Magazine 1/2 Copyright 1937-2015 Yale Alumni Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. The Yale Alumni Magazine and its website were until July 2015 published by Yale Alumni Publications, Inc., an alumni-based nonprofit not run by Yale University. Content published before July 2015 is the responsibility of its editors and third-party users of the website and does not necessarily reflect the views of Yale or its officers. Asked how the department allowed Darnell to participate in employment decisions about someone with whom he was having an affair, Foster calls it \u201can interesting aspect of this situation\u201d and adds really don\u2019t see any basis for impugning anybody\u2019s past appointment.\u201d Yale officials decline to comment. Yale bars faculty from sexual relationships with any undergraduates, or with graduate students under their supervision, citing \u201cunequal institutional power\u201d and risks to \u201cthe integrity of the educational process.\u201d Last June, Yale signed an agreement with the education department\u2019s civil rights office, settling a Title sex-discrimination complaint in which students and alumni accused the university of failing to vigorously investigate and punish sexual misconduct. Without admitting wrongdoing, Yale commissioned a study by prominent alumni; hired one of its authors into a new position overseeing campus life; revamped systems for handling sex-misconduct complaints; and began publishing semiannual reports on those complaints and their resolutions. The July 2012 report noted an apparently unrelated case in which a faculty member agreed to a two-year unpaid suspension for a similar violation of the consensual relations policy. Filed under Faculty & Staff The comment period has expired. 2/22/25, 8:59 Professor suspended over affair with student | Light & Verity | Yale Alumni Magazine 2/2", "7931_105.pdf": "John Darnell Born John Coleman Darnell August 1962 (age 62) Prattville, Alabama, U.S. Spouses Deborah Darnell \u200b\u200b(m. 1989; div. 2012)\u200b[1] Colleen Darnell \u200b(before 2017)\u200b Academic background Education Johns Hopkins University (BA, MA) University of Chicago (PhD) Academic work Discipline Egyptologist Sub- discipline Desert caravan routes Institutions Yale University John Coleman Darnell John Coleman Darnell (born August 1962)[2] is an American Egyptologist. Darnell attributes his interest in archaeology to his mother, who also had a lifelong interest in archaeology. He grew up in south Alabama and had a particular interest in the Mississippian Mound Builders. Darnell tells a story of his mother reading him archaeology books as a child, hoping he would take a nap, but he was fascinated and did not nap.[3][4][5] Darnell got his (1984) and (1985) at Johns Hopkins University and his PhD (1995) at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. He joined the Yale Department of Near Eastern Languages & Civilizations as Assistant Professor in 1998; he became Associate Professor in 2004, and Professor of Egyptology in 2005.[6] He was the director of the Theban Desert Road Survey, which has used remote sensing to detect transportation networks between settlements in the Western Desert of Egypt that has focused on the connections between Thebes and such settlements as the Kharga Oasis.[7] In January 2013, scandal broke out when it was discovered that John Darnell had engaged in a long- running affair with his student-turned-coworker Colleen Manassa. Within the small Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations (NELC) department, they were the only two faculty members in the even- smaller Egyptology program.[8] \"Four individuals with close ties to the department\" claimed the relationship was common knowledge within the department,[9] and Assyriology professor Benjamin Foster reported \"the basic situation has been known for a very long time.\"[10] In divorce documents filed by Darnell's wife Deborah Darnell on November 5, 2012, she asserted that the affair began in 2000 when Manassa was an undergraduate student under Darnell's supervision.[1] On January 8, 2013, John Darnell admitted to the affair and accepted a one-year suspension without pay.[11][12][13] Darnell also admitted to \"participating in the review\" of Manassa's hiring and attempting to cover up his multiple policy violations.[10] In August the university prohibited Darnell from holding an administrative position until 2023, and Manassa until 2018.[8][14] Biography 2/22/25, 8:59 John Coleman Darnell - Wikipedia January 2013%2C scandal broke,the even-smaller Egyptology program. 1/4 Eventually John was invited back to teach, but Colleen left Yale in 2015.[15] Now married, the pair are residents of Durham, Connecticut. Their book Egypt\u2019s Golden Couple: When Akhenaten and Nefertiti Were Gods on Earth was released in November 2022.[16] In 2007 he had a dog Antef, named after King Antef II.[3] In 2020 he and Colleen have two Basenji dogs, Narmer (after Narmer) and Kemi (from the root km meaning \"black\"). Darnell has been called an Indiana Jones type figure.[3][16] In December 2006 a student of his created a Facebook group titled, \"John C. Darnell...Man, Myth or Legend?\" due to eccentricities such as wearing a monocle, and one time when \"Darnell accidentally took a chunk out of a classroom chair with an ancient sword\".[3][17] He dresses in 1920s-era vintage clothing, both in his professional life and on an every-day basis.[16] Darnell, John; Darnell, Colleen (2022). Egypt's Golden Couple: When Akhenaten and Nefertiti Were Gods on Earth ( St. Martin's Publishing Group 9781250272874. Darnell, John Coleman (2021). Egypt and the Desert ( AAAQBAJ). Cambridge University Press 9781108820530. Darnell, John Coleman; Darnell, Colleen Manassa (2018). The Ancient Egyptian Netherworld Books ( Society of Biblical Literature 9780884142768. Darnell, John Coleman (2013). Theban Desert Road Survey II: The Rock Shrine of Pa\u1e25u, Gebel Akhenaton, and Other Rock Inscriptions from the Western Hinterland of Qam\u00fbla ( ogle.com/books?id=We-YDwAAQBAJ). New Haven: Yale Egyptological Seminar 9780974002569. Darnell, John Coleman; Manassa, Colleen (2007). Tutankhamun's Armies: Battle and Conquest during Ancient Egypt's Late 18th Dynasty ( Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons 9780471743583. Darnell, John Coleman (2006). The Inscription of Queen Katimala at Semna: Textual Evidence for the Origins of the Napatan State ( New Haven: Yale Egyptological Seminar 9780974002538. Darnell, John Coleman (2004). The Enigmatic Netherworld Books of the Solar-Osirian Unity (http s://books.google.com/books?id=q1tIVl2K7fMC). G\u00f6ttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 9783525530559. Darnell, John Coleman; Darnell, Deborah (2002). Theban Desert Road Survey in the Egyptian Western Desert, Volume 1: Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscriptions 1-45 and Wadi el-H\u00f4l Rock Inscriptions 1-45 ( Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 9781885923172. Public image Books 2/22/25, 8:59 John Coleman Darnell - Wikipedia January 2013%2C scandal broke,the even-smaller Egyptology program. 2/4 1. Bass, Carole (January 17, 2013). \"New details in Darnell suspension\" ( e.org/blog_posts/1319-new-details-in-darnell-suspension). Yale Alumni Magazine. Archived (http s://web.archive.org/web/20221111221832/ etails-in-darnell-suspension) from the original on November 11, 2022. 2. \"John Darnell\" ( Radaris. 3. Killingsworth, Catherine (Dec 7, 2007). \"Profile \u2013 Man, Myth, or Legend?\" ( om/blog/2007/12/07/profile-man-myth-or-legend/). Yale Daily News. Archived ( org/web/20170929044040/ d/) from the original on September 29, 2017. 4. Darnell, John. \"Egyptology\" ( MacMillan Report (Interview). Interviewed by Marilyn Wilkes. YouTube: Yale. Retrieved Nov 13, 2022. 5. Burnett, Z.G. (Oct 25, 2022). \"Q&A: Dr John Coleman Darnell & Dr Colleen Darnell\" ( antiquesandthearts.com/qa-dr-john-coleman-darnell-dr-colleen-darnell/). Antiques and the Arts Weekly. Archived ( om/qa-dr-john-coleman-darnell-dr-colleen-darnell/) from the original on October 27, 2022. 6. \"John Coleman Darnell\" ( Yale University, Near Eastern Languages & Civilizations. Archived ( s://nelc.yale.edu/people/john-coleman-darnell) from the original on October 26, 2022. 7. Wilford, John Noble (September 6, 2010). \"Desert Roads Lead to Discovery in Egypt\" ( w.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/science/07archeo.html). The New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2022. \"The explorations of the Theban Desert Road Survey, a Yale University project co-directed by the Darnells, called attention to the previously underappreciated significance of caravan routes and oasis settlements in Egyptian antiquity.\" 8. Bass, Carole (August 28, 2013). \"Scandal brings new punishments for Egyptology program\" (http s://yalealumnimagazine.org/blog_posts/1550-scandal-brings-new-punishments-br-for-egyptology- program). Yale Alumni Magazine. Archived ( alealumnimagazine.org/blog_posts/1550-scandal-brings-new-punishments-br-for-egyptology-prog ram) from the original on November 11, 2022. 9. Narea, Nicole; Zorthian, Julia (Jan 14, 2013). \"Darnell suspended following affair with fellow professor, former student\" ( g-affair-with-fellow-professor-former-student/). Yale Daily News. Archived ( web/20130425115646/ r-with-fellow-professor-former-student/) from the original on April 25, 2013. 10. Bass, Carole (March\u2013April 2013). \"Professor suspended over affair with student\" ( nimagazine.org/articles/3656-professor-suspended-over-affair-with-student). Yale Alumni Magazine. Archived ( g/articles/3656-professor-suspended-over-affair-with-student) from the original on November 13, 2022. 11. Branch, Mark Alden (February 1, 2013). \"Yale staffer reported Darnell relationship\" ( mnimagazine.org/blog_posts/1335-yale-staffer-reported-darnell-relationship). Yale Alumni Magazine. Archived ( g/blog_posts/1335-yale-staffer-reported-darnell-relationship) from the original on November 11, 2022. 12. Lalwani, Nikita; Zorthian, Julia (Jan 10, 2013). \"Darnell resigns as dept chair following relationship with student\" ( elationship-with-student/). Yale Daily News. Archived ( 51/ with-student/) from the original on January 13, 2013. References 2/22/25, 8:59 John Coleman Darnell - Wikipedia January 2013%2C scandal broke,the even-smaller Egyptology program. 3/4 13. \"John Coleman Darnell\" ( darnell). Academic Sexual Misconduct Database. Archived ( 193428/ from the original on February 5, 2022. 14. Zorthian, Julia (Aug 28, 2013). \"Egyptology program in hot water\" ( 2013/08/28/egyptology-program-in-hot-water/). Yale Daily News. Archived ( g/web/20170710000216/ ater/) from the original on July 10, 2017. 15. Laneri, Raquel (Nov 12, 2022). \"Meet the sexy Egyptology scholars who dress like Indiana Jones characters\" ( iana-jones/). New York Post. Archived ( t.com/2022/11/12/meet-the-sexy-egyptology-scholars-who-dress-like-indiana-jones/) from the original on November 12, 2022. 16. Craven, TinaMarie (October 20, 2022). \"Clad in vintage 1920s fashion Egyptologist couple explores ancient world\" ( couple-ct-yale-17514448.php). CTInsider.com. Retrieved November 13, 2022. \"Egypt's Golden Couple: When Akhenaten and Nefertiti Were Gods on Earth will be published Nov. 1 by the professorial pair of John Coleman Darnell and Colleen Darnell, who live in Durham.... Both John and Colleen prefer to wear vintage fashion in every part of their life and together they run an Instagram account that focuses on vintage styles and ancient Egypt.\" 17. Young, Ashley (December 16, 2006). \"John C. Darnell...Man, Myth or Legend?\" ( e.org/web/20221114063654/ Facebook. Archived from the original ( on November 14, 2022. Retrieved from \" 2/22/25, 8:59 John Coleman Darnell - Wikipedia January 2013%2C scandal broke,the even-smaller Egyptology program. 4/4"} |
7,688 | J. Wayne “Jimmy” Jones | University of Charleston | [
"7688_101.pdf",
"7688_101.pdf"
] | {"7688_101.pdf": "archive.today webpage capture Saved from no other snapshots from this url search 28 Feb 2025 17:53:32 All snapshots from host share download .zip report bug or abuse Buy me a coffee Webpage Screenshot 47\u00b0 Friday, February 28, 2025 COLUMN: Rodriquez wants to develop a 'freshman \u2026 West Virginia union leaders call on lawmakers t\u2026 Measles is one of the world's most contagious v\u2026 Outnumbered and facing bleak odds, West Virgini\u2026 Fired professor: Sex with students is common Aug 10, 2007 Updated Jul 27, 2014 popular University of Charleston administrator and teacher, who says he was fired last month for having sex with students, claims student-teacher relationships are common practice and he was singled out because he criticized the school. J. Wayne \u201cJimmy\u201d Jones, 39, who worked at for about three years, posted an entry on his blog Wednesday afternoon with information about his firing, his admitted relationships with students \u2014 one of whom he had a child with \u2014 as well as several accusations against the private university and its academic programs. Student-teacher relationships at \u201chappened before and will happen again,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s unfortunate. It shouldn\u2019t happen, but it happens all the time.\u201d \u201cThey did allow one student to stay with a previous professor in university housing for nearly a year,\u201d he added. The university denied most of what Jones wrote in his blog, as well as his comment that administrators tolerate relationships between students and teachers Friday, February 28, 2025 Comics and Puzzles 12 hrs ago 2024 Mar 30, 2024 A-1 (2 Department Of Environmental Protection Daily Comics Search... Contact Us E-Paper Local Events Celebrations Remembrances Legal Notices \u201cWhat can tell you is that the university did dismiss professor Jones and that I\u2019m not able to get into the specifics of why he was dismissed \u2014 beyond what he has already set forth in his blog,\u201d said lawyer Kevin Carr provision in the employee manual \u201cstrictly prohibits any type of amorous relationships\u201d between students and staff, he said. \u201cUnder no circumstances does this university tolerate any relationships\u201d between faculty and students, Carr said. Jones said university officials first told him about an investigation into allegations of multiple student relationships on July 13, and that he was fired four days later. He believes, however, that the decision to fire him was the result of months of internal criticisms about the school, not inappropriate student relationships. Jones\u2019 criticisms range from low admission rates of pre-pharmacy students into the School of Pharmacy to a university decision to close its interior design program without telling incoming students. Jones heard rumors, he says, that he was going to be fired long before he was told of an investigation in mid-July. He plans to file a civil lawsuit against for wrongful termination. \u201cThey told me was fired because they had concluded was having relationships with multiple students,\u201d he said do not believe it was strictly about the relationships believe it was a justification for getting rid of me,\u201d he said had made a lot of people unhappy out there with my internal criticisms.\u201d Carr denied this, saying the first he heard about Jones\u2019 complaints were from his blog entry, which was posted Wednesday afternoon can tell you that is wholly untrue,\u201d he said of the claims. \u201cThe first time read about any of this stuff (criticisms against UC) was when read the blog an hour or so ago.\u201d Carr added that Jones\u2019 statements about the pre-pharmacy students and interior design program are inaccurate and \u201cvery harmful\u201d to the university, faculty and students. Jones also says the method in which he was removed from his job was unusual within the academic field. More Obituaries Resident wants Fairmont City Council to consider a new backyard chickens ordinance World champions Chock and Bates of the are 2nd behind Canadian duo in Four Continents ice dance COLUMN: Seven quarterbacks will compete for starring role at Mountaineers are a strong team now and especially in the future Fairmont's Gateway Connector resurfacing project kicked off Monday Tre Holloman's midcourt buzzer- beater could propel Michigan State to a Big Ten title Grant Town in Marion County, West Virginia Trending Recipes PILL, Toni Hudgins, Joseph SMITH, Joan Michelle Shackelford ROBINSON, Nathan Iser, Louise Bell, Sr., Orville Articles Remembrances Most Popular First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Once they told him he was fired, they gave him a few minutes to gather items in his office and had Charleston Police escort him off campus, he said. Carr denied that police escorted Jones off campus was never warned,\u201d Jones said. \ue603 See All Events \uf067 Add your event Times Events 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 \ue600 Spooky Golf Coal Country Mini Golf Sat, Mar 01 Journal Club White Hall Fri, Feb 28 Monthly Traditional Music Jam Frank and Jane Gabor W\u2026 Fri, Feb 28 Live Music @ Sagebrush Round-Up Sagebrush Round Up Sat, Mar 01 West Virginia Press Association fostering next generation of reporting talent West Virginia health care advocates decry proposed cuts to Medicaid Missing Fairmont woman's body found after six months Paul Steinhaus named chief information officer at Fairmont State COLUMN: Money has killed any days of innocence college football ever had Rodriguez wants players 'who will crawl over someone to win a game' Marion County man faces animal cruelty charges after one dog found dead, others abandoned Let's lift up kids and public education Contact Information timeswv.com 300 Quincy Street Box 2530 Fairmont 26555 Sections News Comics Trending Video Recommended for you +5 Phone: (304) 367-2500 Email: [email protected] Services About Us Contact Us Advertise with Us Subscriber Services Submission Forms Cookie Preferences Puzzles Sports Community Opinion Obituaries Photos Video Gallery Weather \u00a9 Copyright 2025 Times West Virginian 300 Quincy Street Box 2530, Fairmont | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy Powered by Content Management System from Digital."} |
7,436 | John Madden | Michigan State University | [
"7436_101.pdf",
"7436_102.pdf"
] | {"7436_101.pdf": "Take a peek behind the curtain and test drive the StateNews.com today! news / msu Spartan Marching Band director to retire, effective August Rachel Fradette June 16, 2017 An investigation into sexual harassment by Spartan Marching Band director John T. Madden with the Office of Institutional Equity began on February 29, 2016. It was determined Madden's conduct toward the student was unwelcome behavior of sexual nature. Spartan Marching Band Director and professor John T. Madden will retire from the Spartan Marching Band and the university on Aug. 16, according to an email sent to members of the Spartan Marching Band. The email was sent by the Dean of the College of Music James Forger on June 16. David Thornton, previously assistant director of bands and associate director of the Spartan Marching Band, was appointed as the new Spartan Marching Band director effective June 14. He will lead the band in the upcoming season. Madden, who graduated from MSU\u2019s College of Music in 1985, served as director for 28 years. During his tenure, Madden led the band in a Rose Bowl and two Cotton Bowl Classic games, in addition to countless other sporting events including the Tournament National Championship game in 2000 and 2009. Before he came to to serve as director, Madden worked with Wichita State University Bands and briefly served as Associate Director of Bands and Director of the Marching Band at Rutgers University. He serves on the Michigan Chair of the College Band Directors National Association and the Big Ten Band Directors Association, among others. 2/22/25, 10:01 Spartan Marching Band director to retire, effective August - The State News 1/2 He oversaw the fight song's name change from Fight Song\u201d to \u201cVictory For MSU\u201d in 2015. In April 2016, MSU\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity conducted an investigation and found Madden violated policy and sexually harassed a student in February 2016. Madden's disciplinary actions included: \"a one-week suspension from May 27 to June 3, 2016, where Madden was not allowed to be on campus or represent in any capacity, a delay of his promotion to a full-time professor until Oct. 1, 2016 and a ban from the 2017 Huddle.\" \u201cWe look forward to the coming season and to advancing the excellence, standards, and traditions of the Spartan Marching Band under the leadership of Dr. Thornton,\u201d Forger said via email spokesperson Jason Cody confirmed Madden\u2019s retirement and Thornton\u2019s new role via text message. Madden Retirement Email by The State News on Scribd search... sections news sports spotlight opinion classifieds obituaries quick links about advertise board of directors photo reprints privacy policy corrections & archives student positions social alumni contact us email newsletter All Content \u00a9 2025 State News, Inc. Powered by Solutions by The State News. 2/22/25, 10:01 Spartan Marching Band director to retire, effective August - The State News 2/2", "7436_102.pdf": "| Published: Wed 15th February, 13:58 2017 Photo credit: Tom Pennington/ [object Object] Thanks to some hard-nosed student journalists, a recent sexual harassment case involving the Michigan State marching band director has come to light 10 months after the school attempted to address the matter internally. Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 1/6 Spartan Marching Band director John T. Madden was suspended last summer after an internal investigation revealed he had sexually harassed a female student, sending her numerous inappropriate text messages. The student reported the interactions to the school in February 2016, leading to an investigation and one-week suspension for Madden, who is in his 28th year as band director. None of this was public knowledge until a Feb. 9 report from , Michigan State\u2019s student paper, which obtained text messages Madden sent to the former marching band member. Spanning from Nov. 10, 2015 to Feb. 27, 2016, the director attempted to initiate a number of dates, picture exchanges, and conversations with the student. Per The State News, Madden texted the student the following: \u201cPics of your dress are required \u2026 Discreetly of course\u201d \u201cWhen the season ends ... We\u2019re going ice skating! I\u2019m an old hockey player!\u201d \u201cBlingy dress!! A+ I\u2019m a fan. Yes ... Will be a good year.\u201d \u201cJust finished my conducting gig ... Having a couple beers at a local bar ... Sorry for being a creepy texter.\u201d Madden had the student call him Feb. 27, telling her his behavior was inappropriate and that he was \u201cworking through some things right now,\u201d adding that he and his wife were having marital issues. Two days later, the student reported his actions to the university senior investigator in the university\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity filed a completed report in April 2016, which found that Madden violated the Relationship Violence & Sexual Misconduct Policy by way of using his position of power to impose his desires upon a student and laborer. As a result, Madden was suspended for a week without pay over the summer and had his promotion to full-time professor withheld for three months. Michigan State spokesperson Jason Cody reportedly sent the following statement to university officials in October 2016, when he anticipated a story would break. He provided The State News the same statement months later in 2017 and sent it to us when contacted on Wednesday; unlike the recent football sexual assault investigation, no press releases were sent out when Madden was under investigation or briefly suspended last May: 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 2/6 \u201cJohn Madden, director of the Spartan Marching Band, was suspended without pay May 27, 2016, to June 3, 2016, among other personnel actions. The suspension came after an investigation by MSU\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity into improper conduct the prior semester. While does not discuss specific personnel actions or investigations, the Office of Institutional Equity\u2019s investigation found Madden violated the Relationship Violence & Sexual Misconduct Policy. In addition to the personnel actions imposed, the university will continue its ongoing work with the Spartan Marching Band to ensure it provides a learning environment free from harassment.\u201d In a letter to the school, a lawyer representing the student maligned the school for its light punishment of Madden, claiming it merely instructed him to \u201ctake one unpaid week of vacation, wait 3 months and we will promote you as planned, and skip a Band party next year.\u201d The letter also informed the school that the student would finish her degree online, as being on campus caused too much distress: After much thought, reflecting upon the extreme discomfort she experienced whenever encountering Madden (or even on-campus reminders about Band), she will not return to the East Lansing campus. Including Madden, Michigan State has now suspended at least four staff members in relation to some form of sexual assault or harassment during the past year recruiter for the Spartans football team, Curtis Blackwell, was suspended last week with pay, the same time that the school announced three football team members and one staff member were being investigated for sexual assault. On Monday, it was made public that Michigan State gymnastics coach Kathie Klages was suspended from her post after being named in multiple lawsuit complaints. She resigned on Tuesday. The complaints alleged Klages dissuaded Spartan athletes from seeking charges against suspended team physician Larry Nassar, who is now the being sued by current and former members of Gymnastics and Michigan State female athletes for sexually assaulting them during routine exams. [ The State News] 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 3/6 Sat Feb 22 2025 Best Sports Betting Picks Today: College Basketball Predictions For February 22nd Fri Feb 21 2025 4 Nations Face-Off Proves One Thing: The Needs More Of This 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 4/6 Fri Feb 21 2025 Best Sports Betting Picks Today: College Basketball Predictions For February 21st Thu Feb 20 2025 Three Overrated College Football Teams Headed Into 2025 Thu Feb 20 2025 Let\u2019s Overreact To Luka Doncic\u2019s First Three Games With The Los Angeles Lakers Thu Feb 20 2025 These Five Bottom Feeders Are Already Pretty Much Eliminated From 2025 Playoffs Thu Feb 20 2025 Best Sports Betting Picks Today: 4 Nations Face-Off Bets For February 20th Wed Feb 19 2025 Three Big Storylines As 2025 Season Inches Closer To Playoff Time Wed Feb 19 2025 Netflix Wants Sunday Afternoon Regular Season Games, And That\u2019s Great Idea Wed Feb 19 2025 Gloves Off Or Game On Vs. Canada Rematch Promises Fireworks 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 5/6 Sitemap Privacy Terms of Use About Us Copyright 2025 View All Best Sports Betting Picks Today: College Basketball Predictions For February 18th Best Sports Betting Picks Today: 4 Nations Face Off, College Basketball Bets For February 17th Best Sports Betting Picks Today All-Star Game, Daytona 500, College Basketball Bets For February\u2026 Best Sports Betting Picks Today Three-Point Contest, College Basketball Predictions For February\u2026 Best Sports Betting Picks Today Rising Stars, College Basketball Predictions For February 14th Best Sports Betting Picks Today: NBA, College Basketball Predictions For February 13th Best Sports Betting Picks Today Gambling Predictions For February 12th home \u203a michigan-state-marching-band-director-was-suspended-for-1792383442 2/22/25, 10:01 Deadspin | Michigan State Band Director Was Suspended One Week For Sexually Harassing Student<em></em> 6/6"} |
8,418 | Adam Joyce | City University of New York - Hunter College | [
"8418_101.pdf"
] | {"8418_101.pdf": "Hamas begins release of six Israeli hostages -- including 2 held for a decade mother\u2019s fight to get an ex prof barred from teaching after affair with daughter By Melissa Klein Published Aug. 10, 2019 Updated Aug. 10, 2019, 6:21 p.m 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 1/9 New York woman who has suffered a lifetime of grief \u2014 losing her husband on 9/11 and only child to suicide on Valentine\u2019s Day 2017 \u2014 is trying to ban from all classrooms the professor who left her daughter heartbroken and distraught. Marcia Weiss has written to more than 200 colleges to say that Adam Joyce violated the sexual misconduct policy at Hunter College by having a relationship with a student \u2014 her daughter Gina have decided to personally put every college and university in the tri-state area (as well as in California) on notice of this violation,\u201d she writes in her letters. \u201cThe reason is that there is no guarantee that this information will be disclosed to a potential future employer and it is a widely held view that persons who engage in this type of behavior tend to repeat it.\u201d But Joyce has already managed to slip through the cracks. He landed a teaching job at a Connecticut college after the school failed to heed Weiss\u2019 warning and he omitted his lurid past from his resume. Gina Weiss met him while a student in a Hunter honors program. The affair between Gina and Joyce began in January 2016 when she was in his political science class. She was 22 and he was a 45- Marcia Weiss in her Westhampton home on Aug. 8 holding a picture of her daughter. Doug Kuntz 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 2/9 year-old married father of two. Weiss said her daughter, though brilliant, had recurring after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Gina was 7 and living in Greenwich Village with her family when she witnessed the Twin Towers burning. She knew her father, David Weiss, the deputy general counsel for Cantor Fitzgerald, worked on the 104th floor. After Gina\u2019s death, Weiss uncovered hundreds of emails her daughter and Joyce had exchanged professing their love for one another. In one March 2016 missive, Joyce writes to Gina, \u201cYou\u2019re consuming my thoughts, time and for f\u2013k\u2019s sake body. As said, I\u2019m f\u2013king lech fell for your mind and how you relate to me as a soul who makes connections that want to make. \u2026 I\u2019m fully capable of lust. Even when it\u2019s completely inappropriate. Which is basically always.\u201d Gina Weiss in 2015.Marcia Weiss 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 3/9 The romantic relationship ended in May 2016, although the two stayed in constant touch, Weiss said. \u201cShe was not emotionally equipped to deal with anything at the level of intensity that this was \u2014 including being rejected,\u201d Weiss said. Hunter opened a probe after Gina\u2019s death when Weiss informed them of the relationship. Joyce quit before it was concluded. Hunter College president Jennifer Raab wrote Weiss in June 2017 saying \u201cthe evidence supports the allegation that Mr. Joyce engaged in an intimate relationship in violation of CUNY\u2019s sexual misconduct policy.\u201d Joyce was informed by Hunter in a letter seen by The Post that he would be barred from working at any school and that \u201cyour employment record will reflect that you resigned pending an ongoing legal investigation.\u201d But when Joyce applied for a job at Western Connecticut State University in Danbury he left Hunter off his resume and the school office that received Weiss\u2019 warning letter never sent it to the hiring department, according to a school spokesman. Gina Weiss as a young girl 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 4/9 Joyce taught two classes there in Fall 2018 lawyer for Joyce said he would not comment. Weiss said she would like to see a central registry of professors who have violated sexual misconduct policies. \u201cIt\u2019s just a complete absence of vetting, which has allowed these people to move and continue to move and nobody is taking any action that I\u2019m aware of to make it safer,\u201d she said. \u201cBecause, honestly, all 20 year olds are vulnerable.\u201d Joyce joined Hunter College in 2015, among an army of adjuncts teaching in the public City University of New York system, some of them barely vetted 9/11 affairs cuny hunter college students teachers 8/10/19 Cuomo slams vandal who scrawled 'kill the gay away' on Eas Page Six 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 5/9 Jenny Slate allegedly filed complaint while filming 'It Ends With Us' due to 'uncomfortable' interaction: report NYPost 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 6/9 Sections & Features News Metro World News Sports Sports Betting Business Opinion Entertainment Fashion & Beauty Shopping Lifestyle Real Estate Media Tech Influencer hits Elon Musk with paternity suit, seeks sole custody of 5-month-old son: court docs 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 7/9 Science Health Travel Astrology Video Photos Visual Stories Alexa Covers Horoscopes Sports Odds Podcasts Crosswords & Games Columnists Classifieds Post Sports+ Subscribe Articles Manage Newsletters & Feeds Email Newsletters Feeds Post Official Store Home Delivery Subscribe Manage Subscription Delivery Help Help/Support About New York Post Customer Service Apps Help Community Guidelines Contact Us Tips Newsroom Letters to the Editor Licensing & Reprints Careers Vulnerability Disclosure Program Apps iPhone App iPad App Android Phone Android Tablet 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 8/9 Advertise Media Kit Contact \u00a9 2025 Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Membership Terms Privacy Notice Sitemap Your California Privacy Rights 2/22/25, 10:02 Mom wants to bar ex professor from teaching after affair 9/9"} |
7,744 | Joseph H. Levenstein | University of Illinois – Rockford | [
"7744_101.pdf",
"7744_102.pdf",
"7744_103.pdf",
"7744_104.pdf"
] | {"7744_101.pdf": "Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff- appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, Defendants- appellants, 164 F.3d 345 (7th Cir. 1998) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 164 F.3d 345 (7th Cir. 1998) Argued Dec. 12, 1997. Decided Dec. 16, 1998 Richard R. Winter, Sarah E. Pace (argued), McBride, Baker & Coles, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. D. Scott Watson, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago, IL, Carla J. Rozycki (argued), Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants. Before CUMMINGS, ROVNER, and P. WOOD, Circuit Judges P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Although it is often possible to resolve a public official's claim of qualified immunity as a matter of law, by taking the facts in the light most favorable to the party opposing that claim, in a small number of cases the existence of disputed facts requires further proceedings in the district court. Confronted with such a case, a district judge naturally 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 1/12 denies the official's motion to dismiss, or motion for summary judgment, based upon qualified immunity. That action sets up an odd problem for appellate review: if a district court denies qualified immunity because the record shows disputed issues of fact, the Supreme Court has ruled that the order is not immediately appealable. Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 307, 115 S. Ct. 2151, 132 L. Ed. 2d 238 (1995). If, on the other hand, the denial of qualified immunity rests entirely on legal conclusions, then the Court not only permits an immediate appeal but actually encourages one, because of the importance of protecting the public official both from the trial process and from liability. See, e.g., Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, ---- - ----, ---- n. 19, 118 S. Ct. 1584, 1592-93, 1597 n. 19, 140 L. Ed. 2d 759 (1998); Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 308, 116 S. Ct. 834, 133 L. Ed. 2d 773 (1996); Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 525-28, 105 S. Ct. 2806, 86 L. Ed. 2d 411 (1985). In the case before us, Dr. Joseph Levenstein sued three officials of the University of Illinois (\"the University defendants\"), claiming that they violated his constitutional rights by improperly suspending him, denying him a fair hearing, and forcing him to resign from the University because of allegations that he had committed acts of sexual harassment. The University defendants responded with a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (1), (2), and (6), arguing in part that they were entitled to qualified immunity. The district court, adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denied the motion in its entirety, thereby allowing the case to proceed. The defendants then appealed from the portion of the order rejecting their qualified immunity defense. Because this appeal comes to us from a motion under Rule 12(b) (6), we do not face the kind of problem that defeated appellate jurisdiction in Johnson v. Jones, supra. Unlike a motion for summary judgment, which raises in part the question whether the opposing party has demonstrated the existence of disputed facts, a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim raises only legal issues. This is because a Rule 12(b) (6) motion requires the court to accept as true all well-pleaded facts in the complaint, drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the opposing party. Doherty v. City of Chicago, 75 F.3d 318, 322 (7th Cir. 1996); see also Williams v. Alabama State Univ., 102 F.3d 1179, 1182 n. 4 (11th Cir. 1997) (Johnson does not apply to motions to dismiss, which raise purely legal issues). Under Mitchell and Behrens, we have appellate jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from a denial of qualified immunity when no factual issues need to be resolved. See Behrens, 516 U.S. at 308, 116 S. Ct. 834; Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526-27, 105 S. Ct. 2806. We therefore proceed to the merits of the appeal. * Before we recount the relevant facts we must clarify what is properly before us and what is not. Levenstein attached numerous documents to his complaint, which under Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c) are considered part of his complaint. The defendants complicated matters, 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 2/12 though, by attaching a raft of other documents to their motion to dismiss. Under Rule 12(b), when this happens the court must either convert the 12(b) (6) motion into a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 and proceed in accordance with the latter rule, or exclude the documents attached to the motion to dismiss and continue under Rule 12. The defendants argued to the district court that their documents were somehow exempt from this rule and relevant to the motion to dismiss; Levenstein disagreed. (This spat is typical of the skirmishes these parties have had on countless issues in the case; motions for sanctions have flown back and forth with abandon. We regret that the parties did not pay more attention to the Standards of Professional Conduct within the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, adopted Dec. 14, 1992.) We agree with Levenstein; the defendants filed a motion to dismiss, not a motion for summary judgment. While \"documents attached to a motion to dismiss are considered part of the pleadings if they are referred to in the plaintiff's complaint and are central to his claim,\" Wright v. Associated Ins. Cos., Inc., 29 F.3d 1244, 1248 (7th Cir. 1994) (citations omitted) (emphasis added), this is a narrow exception aimed at cases interpreting, for example, a contract. It is not intended to grant litigants license to ignore the distinction between motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, and the defendants' perfunctory arguments for the centrality of these documents are unpersuasive. We, like the district court, therefore do not take these documents into account in our review of this case. This also disposes of Levenstein's motion to strike the defendants' principal and reply briefs because of their reliance on the improper materials. We deny the motion to strike as unnecessary. The district court, noting that Levenstein wanted further discovery, chose to handle the case as a straightforward motion to dismiss, rather than converting it to a motion under Rule 56. It was within its discretion to do so. Cf. Venture Associates Corp. v. Zenith Data Systems Corp., 987 F.2d 429, 431 (7th Cir. 1993). First, as the defendants are plainly aware, motions for judgment based on qualified immunity should be decided as early as possible, and thus when such a motion might be granted without discovery the district court is well within its discretion to address it. Cf. Crawford-El, 523 U.S. at ----, 118 S. Ct. at 1593. In exceptional cases the defendants may take a second appeal from a district court's refusal at a later stage to dismiss the action on the ground of qualified immunity. Behrens, 516 U.S. at 308, 116 S. Ct. 834. Finally, we note with perplexity that the complaint in this case seems to be covered under a protective order issued by the district court. The parties inexplicably have failed to include that order in the record on appeal, and in any event we can see no reason on the face of the appellate record why the complaint itself was so protected. Litigation is a public exercise; it consumes public resources. It follows that in all but the most extraordinary cases--perhaps 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 3/12 those involving weighty matters of national security--complaints must be public. In any event, given that the briefs on appeal are (appropriately) publicly available documents, and the briefs recount all allegations contained in the complaint, we present the facts as alleged in the complaint Levenstein was born and raised in South Africa, where he practiced medicine from 1969 until 1990. He was affiliated with the University of Capetown for that entire time, and was the head of its Unit of General Practice, Department of Community Health, from 1978 to 1990. With numerous publications to his name and visiting positions at 14 universities in four different countries, he earned an international reputation over the years. This attracted the attention of the University of Illinois, which recruited him in 1990 to join the medical school in Rockford as a tenure track professor and head of the Department of Family and Community Medicine. After a short time, the University named him executive head of the Family and Community Medicine Departments for all four University campuses. The University awarded him tenure in 1992, and he received other awards in 1994. In early 1995, Levenstein became suspicious about certain unexplained financial losses at the medical school, which he described in his complaint. In April 1995, he formally requested a detailed accounting to explain a $504,000 charge against his department and the \"Medical Service Plan\" for unnamed expenses; he also requested general budgetary information about the medical school. The University never furnished this information. Levenstein also had reservations about the University's use of certain state funds, which he thought were being misspent. Even though Levenstein brought these concerns to defendant Dean Bernard Salafsky's attention, Salafsky took no action. On April 11, 1995, Ray Carlson, Levenstein's \"Special Projects Director,\" met with a representative of the University's business administration office, who allegedly criticized Levenstein's inquiries. Two days later, on April 13, defendant Patricia Gill, the deputy associate chancellor for the University of Illinois Affirmative Action Program in Chicago (\"the AAP\"), received an anonymous letter from a medical student complaining that Levenstein had sexually harassed her. Gill informed Levenstein, Salafsky, and Executive Dean Gerald Moss about the complaint, but she told Levenstein that no investigation would be opened because the complaint was anonymous. In the meantime, Levenstein continued to pursue his inquiries about possible financial irregularities. He met with Salafsky and Dr. Donald Wortmann, the associate dean of 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 4/12 Education, on May 11. At that meeting, according to Levenstein's allegations, Salafsky and Wortmann tried to persuade him to resign, and they ominously referred to a former associate dean of the College of Medicine who had been demoted under a cloud of sexual harassment allegations. Salafsky told Levenstein that if he did not resign he would be suspended with pay effective 5:00 p.m. that day. Levenstein refused, and Salafsky then issued a letter suspending him effective 5:00 p.m., prohibiting him from entering University facilities during his suspension, and telling him to contact Gill should he have any questions. According to Levenstein, this procedure did not comply with the rules for suspending a tenured professor contained in the contract governing his employment with the University. Those rules stipulate that only the president could order such a suspension, and only \"under exceptional circumstances, and when such action is clearly necessary and justified.\" The complaint alleges that the University defendants admitted that the president was not involved in the decision to suspend Levenstein. One hour before his suspension was scheduled to begin, Levenstein contacted Gill for further information. She told him that she had discussed the situation with Salafsky, and suggested that Levenstein could avoid an official investigation if he resigned by Monday, May 15, 1995. The pressure mounted when Salafsky called an emergency meeting of the faculty the next day, May 12, to address Levenstein's suspension. At the meeting, Salafsky publicly stated that he had repeatedly warned Levenstein about his five-year pattern of sexually harassing behavior. Salafsky also alleged that he had decided to investigate these charges after Gill received letters during the preceding month from \"at least four\" women claiming that Levenstein had committed acts of verbal or physical abuse (or both). Levenstein alleges that his file contained no record of complaints about or warnings derived from a five-year pattern of harassment, and that Gill and Salafsky had only the one anonymous letter at the time they acted. The University defendants continued to take a variety of actions designed to force Levenstein out over the next several months, including notifying the hospitals where he practiced that it would not provide back-up coverage, which prompted them to suspend Levenstein's privileges, and withdrawing his university-supplied malpractice insurance. (Levenstein alleges these actions were unnecessary since he was contractually prohibited from competing with the University by working at these hospitals while suspended.) Salafsky and Gill also recruited additional complainants against Levenstein, and Salafsky began planning for his replacement. Gill began spreading rumors that Levenstein had a history of inappropriate behavior, and she falsely told members of Levenstein's staff that students had complained about him in the past in an effort to convince staff members to file complaints against Levenstein. Two did, and in May the formerly anonymous student 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 5/12 came forward under pressure from the administration. Gill suggested that the various complainants compare notes, which they did. After receiving written complaints from these three women, Gill edited and rewrote those complaints to transform them from generalized complaints about Levenstein's character to specific, and more sinister, allegations of sexual harassment. The complainants asked that Levenstein be removed from supervisory roles. In the meantime, Levenstein continued unsuccessfully to try to look into the financial issues. His assistant involved in these investigations was fired, and Levenstein claims that certain files relating to the investigations disappeared from his office. Salafsky at this point assigned fiscal control of Levenstein's department to himself, so that (according to Levenstein) he could \"subvert state and federal grant monies.\" During this period, 13 faculty members in Levenstein's department were allegedly fired, given terminal contracts, or felt compelled to resign in protest of Levenstein's treatment. Gill's investigation continued. The complaint alleges that she refused to interview the people Levenstein asked her to contact, she went to great lengths to solicit negative information, and she twisted the information she did obtain from witnesses. After taking longer than allowed by University policy to complete the investigation, the University's office eventually concluded that Levenstein had violated the University's policy against sexual harassment. It advised Deans Moss and Salafsky to allow him to return to the classroom and to treating patients, but to prohibit him from holding any supervisory role over women for a period of three years. The recommendation was expressly contingent on the University's deciding that he could work as a member of the faculty without being in a supervisory role; if that was not possible, the recommended his dismissal. Salafsky never responded to the recommendations, as he was required to do by University policy. Levenstein appealed to defendant Chancellor David C. Broski. Again, however, the University's rules were breached in multiple ways. The Sexual Harassment Procedures specified that the Chancellor was to choose appeal panel members, but instead, Levenstein alleged, he allowed Gill to hand-pick the committee. Also in violation of University policy Levenstein was not allowed to be heard or to present witnesses to this panel, although he was invited to, and did, submit his reasons for the appeal on August 22. At the same time, he filed an action against the University and Dean Salafsky in the Illinois Court of Claims, alleging breach of contract and tortious interference with business relationships. (As far as the record shows, to date there has been no judgment in the state court case; we therefore do not need to explore any questions about claim preclusion.) Gill was allegedly involved in distributing Levenstein's submitted statement to the appeals panel and repeatedly discussed the case with the panel. After a delay longer than allowed under University policy, the panel ultimately found Levenstein guilty on all charges, and, despite privately 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 6/12 concluding that Levenstein's suspension should be lifted, left the question of the appropriate sanction up to Broski. About a month after receiving the panel's report, Broski removed Levenstein from his position as department head and recommended to President Stukel that Levenstein be dismissed. On January 9, 1996, Stukel wrote to Levenstein and promised to \"view this matter most seriously.\" These words proved empty. Stukel instead did nothing for a month, and then he wrote on February 7 to inform Levenstein that he was being reassigned pending consultation with the Faculty Advisory Committee (FAC) about whether cause existed for his dismissal. The reassignment proved to be demeaning make-work, a job reviewing old medical training videotapes at his home. Levenstein appeared before the a month later, which, like the prior appellate panel, had been briefed by Gill, with only damning material provided. The limited his hearing to one hour, refused to read material he had brought, and refused to allow his attorney to address the committee. It, too, then sat on its hands. When, six weeks after the hearing, the had still done nothing, Levenstein resigned from the University in despair. At its core, Levenstein's suit alleges that the procedures the University defendants used in essentially forcing him out were a blatant sham--the equivalent of no procedures at all. Most or all of them plainly violated internal University rules. For example, he alleges that only the president had the authority initially to suspend a tenured faculty member, but the dean purported to take that action in his case. Similarly, the University's procedures require that a tenured faculty member receive a formal hearing within 60 days of a suspension, whereas in his case things were dragging on indefinitely, and he was forced to perform pointless work and live with a cloud on his reputation. And, he alleges, the decisionmakers themselves were tainted, all convinced in advance of his guilt. As Levenstein has pleaded this case, the question is whether state university officials have qualified immunity from a claim that alleges a deprivation of constitutional rights in these circumstances. His complaint claims of a violation of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983, through a violation of his right to procedural due process, for deprivation of his property interest in his job without adequate procedures, and a violation of his right to equal protection, because the University defendants used arbitrary disciplinary procedures that were enforced against him differently from the way they were applied to others based on his exercise of protected constitutional rights Public officials are entitled to qualified immunity from \"liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 7/12 a reasonable person would have known.\" Crawford-El, 523 U.S. at ----, 118 S. Ct. at 1592, quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S. Ct. 2727, 73 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1982). See also Behrens, 516 U.S. at 305, 116 S. Ct. 834. As we stated in Erwin v. Daley, 92 F.3d 521, 525 (7th Cir. 1996): [t]he inquiry focuses on the objective legal reasonableness of the action, not the state of mind or good faith of the officials in question. Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 639, 107 S. Ct. 3034, 97 L. Ed. 2d 523 (1987). It is an objective test, as the Supreme Court recently reiterated, \"precisely in order to permit the defeat of insubstantial claims without resort to trial.\" Behrens, 516 U.S. at 306, 116 S. Ct. 834 (internal quotations omitted). As Erwin also made clear, once the public official raises the defense of qualified immunity, the plaintiff bears the burden of showing (1) whether he or she has asserted a violation of a constitutional right, and (2) whether the applicable constitutional standards were clearly established at the time in question. Erwin, 92 F.3d at 525; see also Khuans v. School Dist. 110, 123 F.3d 1010, 1013 (7th Cir. 1997); Estate of Stevens v. City of Green Bay, 105 F.3d 1169, 1173-74 (7th Cir. 1997). In the present case, the question is whether Levenstein has successfully alleged a violation of one or more constitutional rights, and if so, whether he has shown that the constitutional standards were objectively clear at the time the University defendants took their action. It is also important to address the latter question at the proper level of specificity. See Anderson, 483 U.S. at 639-40, 107 S. Ct. 3034 (\" [T]he right the official is alleged to have violated must have been 'clearly established' in a more particularized, and hence more relevant, sense: The contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.\"). Public officials should not need to have the insight of constitutional law scholars, or the hindsight of Monday morning quarterbacks, to succeed in a qualified immunity defense. Cf. Crawford-El, 523 U.S. at ----, 118 S. Ct. at 1593. Looking first at Levenstein's procedural due process claim, we begin with the easy questions. It is undisputed that, as a tenured faculty member, he had a property interest in his job. Pittman v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 64 F.3d 1098, 1104 (7th Cir. 1995); Fumarolo v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 142 Ill. 2d 54, 153 Ill.Dec. 177, 566 N.E.2d 1283, 1306-07 (Ill.1990); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601, 92 S. Ct. 2694, 33 L. Ed. 2d 570 (1972). He has attempted to argue on appeal that he was also deprived of a liberty interest in his good name, but that claim was not before the district court in the First Amended Complaint, and we therefore do not rely on it. Second, Levenstein is not arguing that the initial act of suspending him with pay violated any constitutional right, and he is wise not to do so in light of Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 117 S. Ct. 1807, 138 L. Ed. 2d 120 (1997), and Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 105 S. Ct. 1487, 84 L. Ed. 2d 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 8/12 494 (1985). See also Ibarra v. Martin, 143 F.3d 286 (7th Cir. 1998). Instead, he is arguing that the combination of the sham process the University defendants followed and his extensive suspension amounted to a constructive discharge, and that the University defendants never gave him an adequate opportunity to respond to that action. This is very similar to the claim we recognized in Parrett v. City of Connersville, 737 F.2d 690, 694 (7th Cir. 1984), cert. dismissed, 469 U.S. 1145, 105 S. Ct. 828, 83 L. Ed. 2d 820 (1985), in which this court held that a person could be effectively deprived of a property interest in a job by being relegated to the basement with no work to do. The University defendant's decision to forbid Levenstein from seeing patients for over 11 months and to eventually assign him to the task of reviewing old medical training videos are, for a physician whose reputation spanned several continents, the equivalent. Levenstein has therefore adequately alleged a constructive discharge, and his allegations that the procedures used were inadequate and biased were also enough to survive a motion to dismiss. Levenstein had notice of the charges and understood the evidence against him, but when the procedures used to investigate the charges are a sham through and through, there has not been a constitutionally sufficient opportunity to respond. See Doe v. Board of Educ. of Oak Park & River Forest High School Dist. 200, 115 F.3d 1273, 1283 (7th Cir. 1997); Ciechon v. City of Chicago, 686 F.2d 511, 517 (7th Cir. 1982) (\"Due process requires that a hearing 'must be a real one, not a sham or a pretense.' \") (quoting Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123, 164, 71 S. Ct. 624, 95 L. Ed. 817 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., concurring), quoting Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 327, 58 S. Ct. 149, 82 L. Ed. 288 (1937)). This is not, of course, because the Constitution requires the University to follow the letter of its own procedures, but because Levenstein is entitled to constitutionally sufficient procedures before he can be deprived of a protected property interest and he asserts that the University did not furnish them. That takes us to the second part of the immunity inquiry: whether the applicable constitutional standards were clearly established at the time in question. Accepting the facts presented in Levenstein's complaint, and the inferences fairly drawn from those facts, we must at this stage resolve that question in Levenstein's favor as well. The pertinent constitutional standards are long-standing, and include those establishing Levenstein's property right in the job, which has been clear at least since Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of City of New York, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S. Ct. 637, 100 L. Ed. 692 (1956), Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 33 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1972), and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 92 S. Ct. 2694, 33 L. Ed. 2d 570 (1972); those establishing the right to adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard before that job can be taken away, see Roth, 408 U.S. at 573 & n. 12, 92 S. Ct. 2701; see also Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 542-45, 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 9/12 105 S. Ct. 1487; and those clarifying the commonsense notion that fundamentally biased process is not due process. E.g. Palko, supra, 302 U.S. at 327, 58 S. Ct. 149; Fay v. New York, 332 U.S. 261, 288, 67 S. Ct. 1613, 91 L. Ed. 2043 (1947); Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 457, 40 S. Ct. 566, 64 L. Ed. 1010 (1920); Ciechon, 686 F.2d at 517. University officials knew that they could not offer only a phony opportunity to contest charges. In their briefs they dispute this characterization of their actions as a matter of fact, but this is not the time for either them or us to engage in that debate. At this stage, therefore, Levenstein has alleged enough to survive dismissal of his procedural due process claims on qualified immunity grounds. Levenstein's equal protection claim, while it strikes us as more tenuous, at this early stage also adequately alleges a constitutional violation for purposes of resisting the immunity defense. Selective prosecution violates the equal protection clause \"where the decision to prosecute is made either in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutional right, such as the right to free speech or to the free exercise of religion.\" Esmail v. Macrane, 53 F.3d 176, 179 (7th Cir. 1995). It is also actionable \"where the power of government is brought to bear on a harmless individual merely because a powerful state or local official harbors a malignant animosity toward him.\" Id. See also Olech v. Village of Willowbrook, 160 F.3d 386, 387 (7th Cir., Nov.12, 1998). As we explained in Indiana State Teachers Ass'n v. Board of School Commissioners, 101 F.3d 1179, 1181 (7th Cir. 1996), where people identical in relevant ways are treated differently, the disadvantaged person can state an equal protection claim. See also Ciechon, 686 F.2d at 522-23. Although the University defendants have tried to resist Levenstein's claim by pointing out that he has not identified anyone else who was treated better, since no other department head had ever been accused of sexual harassment by multiple people, this proves too much. First, according to the complaint, whose allegations we must take to be true, there was only one complaint against Levenstein at the time of his suspension, it was anonymous, and University officials said that it was not enough to trigger an investigation. Notwithstanding that representation, they vindictively went ahead and investigated Levenstein anyway, setting in motion the chain of events that led to his constructive discharge. Second, at this stage of litigation Levenstein is not obliged to gather the kind of factual support the University defendants believe is lacking. The allegations of his complaint would permit him to gather evidence about the way the University has treated other supervisory employees, other department heads, or possibly other tenured faculty. (Levenstein argues that the appropriate comparison group is tenured faculty members--who are all covered under the same contract--a factual dispute we are not able to resolve at this point in the litigation.) If the preponderance of the evidence eventually supports his claim, then he will meet the 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 10/12 requirements of the equal protection theory. See Esmail, 53 F.3d at 179. Finally, Levenstein has alleged malice and a motive to retaliate against him personally because of his belief that certain financial transactions needed to be reviewed and that his superiors might be covering up financial irregularities. That is enough to put his case squarely into the pattern we recognized in Esmail. See also Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 608, 105 S. Ct. 1524, 84 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1985) (\" [T]he decision to prosecute may not be deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification, including the exercise of protected statutory and constitutional rights.\") (citations omitted). Once again, taking Levenstein's allegations to be true, we find that the relevant constitutional standards were well established at the time the University defendants acted. So-called \"class of one\" equal protection claims, cases \"in which a governmental body treated individuals differently who were identically situated in all respects rationally related to the government's mission,\" Indiana State Teachers Ass'n, 101 F.3d at 1181, have been allowed in this circuit since at least Ciechon. While such claims have rarely been successful once the relevant factual record has been developed, see Esmail, 53 F.3d at 179 (\"the holding [of Ciechon] ... has rarely brought ultimate victory to a plaintiff\"), that is irrelevant to our review of the facts as alleged in Levenstein's complaint. Levenstein's allegation that his suspension, public humiliation, and constructive discharge were caused not by allegations that he had committed acts of sexual harassment, but rather arose from the sheer vindictiveness the University officials felt toward him as a result of his decision to investigate possible financial mismanagement in programs at the University for which he bore some responsibility, falls within the context of selective prosecutions prohibited by the Equal Protection clause. Wayte, 470 U.S. at 608, 105 S. Ct. 1524; Ciechon, 626 F.2d at 523 n. 16; Esmail, 53 F.3d at 179 It is plain from reading the briefs, the motions, and the accusations in this case that the facts are hotly contested. If one believes Levenstein, an honorable physician was virtually framed by the University defendants, just so that they could avoid the embarrassment of a close inspection of the way they managed various grants and other funds. If one believes the University defendants, they were trying to deal with a department head who had a long history of abusing his position in ways that amounted to sexual harassment; they gave him many opportunities to justify his action; and he chose to walk out the door before the internal University procedures could run their course. We take no position on which of these accounts, if either, represents the \"truth\" of the matter. That remains to be seen, in whatever further proceedings are appropriate in the district court. We decide today only that, for purposes of the motion for failure to state a claim, the district court properly 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 11/12 denied the University defendants' claim of qualified immunity, and we the judgment of that court. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Intheir Individual Capacities, De\u2026 12/12", "7744_102.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Levenstein v. Salafsky United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division Feb 4, 2002 97 c 3430 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 4, 2002) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Delegate legal research to CoCounsel, your new legal assistant. Try CoCounsel free 97 c 3430 February 4, 2002 Blanche M. Manning Plaintiff Joseph H. Levenstein was a tenured medical school professor and administrator at the Rockford campus of the University of Illinois at Chicago who resigned in 1996. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David Broski, each are named as defendants in their individual as well as in their Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/23 official capacities on behalf of the university. In his complaint, Levenstein alleges that the defendants violated his constitutional rights during an investigation into sexual harassment allegations against him. Specifically, he alleges that he was deprived of procedural of due process and equal protection within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants move for summary judgment on Levenstein's procedural due process and equal protection claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. They also seek summary judgment that they are entitled to qualified immunity. For the following reasons, the motion is in part and in part. Summary judgment is appropriate when there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). If the non-moving party fails to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of his case, on which he would bear the burden of proof at trial, summary judgment is proper. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). The moving party, however, has the burden of establishing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 (1986). As the non-moving party, Levenstein can avert summary judgment if he can show that there exists specific facts that would present a genuine issue for trial. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 324 genuine issue exists only if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248. He may not simply rely on the pleadings to rebut a proper showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 324. Rather, he must present new evidence to counter a properly established absence of material fact The following facts are derived from the parties' briefs, depositions, affidavits, and other documentary evidence. A. Levenstein's Background Levenstein practiced medicine in South Africa from 1969 to 1990. There, he published numerous articles and other works, served on several committees, and worked as a visiting professor at more than a dozen universities around 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/23 the world. As a result, Levenstein earned international recognition in the field of family and community medicine. He was recruited by the University of Illinois at Chicago and, in May 1990, Levenstein began his employment as a non-tenured professor and head of the Department of Family and Community Medicine at Rockford. In November 1990, the university named Levenstein the executive head of the Family and Community Medicine Departments for the four university campuses. In July 1992, the University awarded him tenure. B. Levenstein's Suspicions of Fiscal Mismanagement Starting in or around August 1994, Levenstein formed a committee, the purpose of which was to act as a \"watchdog\" over funds generated, collected, and spent by the Rockford \"medical service plan\" \u2014 the mechanism for billing, collections, and disbursements flowing to and from the University at Rockford. The formulation of this committee, Levenstein believed, was appurtenant to his responsibilities as a department head, as he shared the responsibility of meeting the University's budget. In April 1995, Levenstein inquired of several administrators, including Salafsky, about what he thought to be unexplained and mysterious financial losses and unspecified medical expenses in the Rockford financial records. Around this time, Levenstein also made requests for budgetary documents pertaining to all of the medical school departments. Most notably, Levenstein was quite vocal about the propriety of plans to construct a new medical clinic facility in Rockford. Levenstein believed that Salafsky was intimately involved with the planning of the new clinic and the appropriation of the funds to build it. He contends that the funds required for the project were not available, yet the project went ahead in an underhanded way to evade University budgetary constraints. Levenstein contends that his concerns were ignored by Salafsky. The point Levenstein makes is that he was outspoken against the construction of the \"grossly overpriced\" new Rockford clinic and became suspicious of Salafsky. Levenstein contends that Salafsky was aware that Levenstein was an obstacle to the completion of the clinic. C. Levenstein's Suspension 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/23 On May 11, 1995, Salafsky met with Levenstein and advised him that accusations of sexual harassment had been made against Levenstein. At the time, no formal complaints had been filed against him, but Salafsky anticipated them soon. At this meeting, Salafsky offered Levenstein the opportunity to resign, and said that if he chose not to, he would be suspended with pay pending an investigation of the allegations. The same day, upon Levenstein's refusal to resign, Salafsky wrote to Levenstein, formally notifying him of the suspension: Given a series of allegations of sexual harassment against you by women at this site am suspending you with pay effective 5:00 p.m. today, May 11, 1995. Under the terms of this suspension you are prohibited from entry into University facilities until this issue is resolved. The period of suspension will end following a complete hearing on this matter conducted by Ms. Patricia Gill, Special Assistant to University Legal Counsel, after which a course of action will be determined . . . Salafsky states that he chose this course of action because he was concerned with what he described as \"numerous complaints\" about Levenstein from staff, faculty and students that had surfaced over the prior month. Also, defendants state that accusations of sexual harassment by Levenstein dated back as far as when Levenstein started his employment at the University. D. History of Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Levenstein In fall of 1990, two female administrative workers in Levenstein's office complained about sexually inappropriate behavior by Levenstein. Both parties agree that Salafsky confronted Levenstein about these complaints shortly after they occurred, but they disagree about the severity of the warning Salafsky issued. In fall of 1993, a female clerk/typist complained that Levenstein's comments and gestures contained inappropriate sexual overtones. In response, Salafsky contends that he instructed Patricia Gill, then Deputy Director for Equal Opportunity and Compliance Affirmative Action Program 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/23 Offices to make a presentation on sexual harassment to Rockford administrators \u2014 which Levenstein attended. In October 1994, a female medical student expressed concerns to Marjorie Stearns, then assistant director of student affairs at Rockford, about Levenstein's behavior toward her, which included sexual remarks and inappropriate physical contact with her. She indicated to Stearns that she wanted to maintain her confidentiality. In April 1995, this student made an anonymous complaint against Levenstein to Gill. In April/May 1995, informal complaints by two female faculty members of sexually inappropriate behavior by Levenstein came to the attention of Salafsky. Apparently, neither woman wished to make a formal complaint at that time. On May 8, 1995, two female support staff members, a secretary and a typist, came forth to a Rockford personnel officer and each made informal complaints of Levenstein's sexual harassment \u2014 consisting of inappropriate remarks and touching. They indicated that they wished to file formal complaints against Levenstein and were referred to Gill. On May 16, they contacted Gill and informed her that they wished to pursue formal complaints against Levenstein. Gill faxed them each a \"Request for Action\" form to complete. On that day or on May 17, the student who filed the anonymous complaint, bolstered by the actions of the two staff members, came forth to Gill and expressed interest in filing a formal complaint against Levenstein. Salafsky contends that he was concerned about the number of complaints against Levenstein, concerned that his previous discussions with Levenstein in combination with Gill's presentation did not produce a change in Levenstein's behavior, and that Levenstein could influence an investigation into the sexual harassment charges against him since he supervised the two support staff members who made the most recent charges against him, and because Levenstein was attempting to discover the identity of the medical student who had voiced concerns about Levenstein to Steams in October 1994. Because of these concerns, Salafsky contends that he decided to suspend Levenstein. E. The University's Sexual Harassment Investigation Against Levenstein 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/23 On May 21, 1995, the two support staff members in Levenstein's office and the formerly anonymous medical student filed formal complaints of sexual harassment against Levenstein. Gill received and reviewed the complaints. Gill made comments on the forms, which were incorporated into final briefs submitted by the complainants. Soon thereafter, Gill launched an investigation into the three formal complaints of sexual harassment against Levenstein. On May 24, 1995, Gill wrote Levenstein informing him that the three women had \"filed a Request for Further Action\" seeking an investigation into their allegations. Gill's letter also described approximately fifteen alleged examples of Levenstein's conduct complained of by the women which described uninvited touching of the hands, neck, back, and rear end; his invasion of their personal space; crude statements which contained sexual overtones or were blatant come-ons. Gill's letter informed Levenstein that because the allegations: if true, could violate UIC's policy prohibiting sexual harassment of our employees, Affirmative Action Programs [\"AAP\"] must proceed to investigate the claim. The first step of the process allows you to respond in writing to the allegations. It is asked that your response to the allegations be submitted within 10 calendar days from the date you receive this letter. In the event that a written response is not received, Affirmative Action Programs will proceed with the investigation by interviewing any individuals who can assist in establishing the facts. On June 12, 1995, Levenstein's counsel responded to Gill's letter which denied any acts of sexual harassment and expressed sympathy for anyone who misperceived his conduct as harassment. Between May 18 and July 17, Gill's investigation included interviews with twenty-one people, including the three complainants, Levenstein (accompanied by counsel), and people whom Levenstein suggested (evidently after he was apprised that an investigation was proceeding) might have knowledge to assist the investigation's just conclusion. Levenstein expressed frustration that Gill decided not to interview all of the witnesses he submitted for her consideration. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/23 On July 23, 1995, Gill issued the conclusions of the AAP's investigation in a fourteen-page report. It recommended a finding that Levenstein violated the University's policy of sexual harassment and subjected \"faculty, staff, and students\" to unwanted sexual gestures, conduct and remarks. The report also concluded that Levenstein \"had sufficient basis\" to know that his conduct was improper. On July 28, Myrna C. Adams, the Associate Chancellor and Director of Affirmative Action Programs, wrote Levenstein the result of the investigation. The letter informed him that where a complaint of sexual harassment is found to be valid, she recommends appropriate relief and remedies. Thus, Adams stated it was her recommendation to not allow Levenstein to exercise authority over female subordinates or employees for a period of up to three years. Adams' letter stated that because the investigation did not reveal evidence that Levenstein was guilty of misconduct in the classroom or while treating patients, her recommendations did not extend to \"classroom instruction, lecturing, or patient treatment. It should apply however, to teaching students in clinical or private setting.\" If it was not possible to create an arrangement for Levenstein to \"fully perform\" his job consistent with the recommendations, Adams recommended that Levenstein be terminated from employment. F. Levenstein's Appeal of the University's Investigation and Recommendations On August 9, 1995, Levenstein wrote to David C. Broski, who then was interim Chancellor of the University, and appealed the findings of the investigation and Adams' recommendations. Thereafter, from a period beginning in August 1995 and continuing through November 1995, Levenstein participated in the appeal process, including testifying at an October 12 hearing before an appeals panel. The panel conducted its own interviews of the complainants, made investigations, reviewed documents, and heard from witnesses. On November 20, 1995, the Faculty Appeal Panel issued a report which concluded that there was a sufficient factual basis to support the conclusion that Levenstein subjected faculty, staff and students to unwanted sexual 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/23 contact, gestures, and statements that were offensive and/or humiliating. It concluded that the vast majority of allegations against Levenstein were supported by a sufficient factual basis. On a few of the allegations, the panel was unable to reach a conclusion or found the incidents too insignificant to warrant a finding of sexual harassment. The panel rejected Levenstein's defenses to the allegations against him, chief among them that the complainants were not credible and that their stories were uncorroborated. Also, the panel rejected Levenstein's contention that the complainants were recruited or manipulated into making allegations against him and that Gill was predisposed to finding him guilty of the allegations as she conducted the investigation. The panel stated that it just did not find credible Levenstein's accusations that the process had been tampered with. The panel did not make recommendations about corrective action or sanctions. It did, however, take note of mitigating and aggravating factors in Levenstein's case. In its view, the aggravating factors included the fact that Levenstein had previously been warned about his inappropriate behavior, apparently to no avail. The mitigating factors in favor of Levenstein included: the support he received from many colleagues, his record of achievement, and testimony from witnesses who had never seen Levenstein behave inappropriately. Thus, Levenstein's appeal of the findings of sexual harassment was denied. G. Seeking Levenstein's Termination from the University 1. Salafsky Gets the Ball Rolling for Levenstein's Termination On December 12, 1995, a little more than three weeks after Levenstein's appeal was denied, Salafsky wrote to Jerry Moss, who was Dean of UICOM. Salafsky recommended that Levenstein be \"removed from the faculty of the University\" for due cause. Salafsky stated that he believed \"the findings of the [AAP] relative to allegations of sexual harassment as stated by Myrna Adams . . . and the subsequent re-affirmation of these findings by an Appeals Panel . . . form the basis of dismissal.\" Addressing Adams' recommendation that the suspension against Levenstein should not extend to classroom instruction, lecturing or patient treatment and should not last more than 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/23 three years in any event, Salafsky stated that dismissal was nevertheless the appropriate course of action because he did not believe Adams' proposed solution could be realized. Salafsky arrived at this conclusion because, in the classroom, students often seek out their instructors for \"one on one clarification\" which Salafsky thought could potentially pose a risk for female students. Patient treatment, Salafsky added, \"involves nurses, particularly where female patients are undergoing examination, and usually involves interaction with clerical staff.\" Thus, \"in my view,\" Salafsky wrote, \"it is quite impossible to place Dr. Levenstein in a teaching, research, or clinical position where he would not have some sort of supervisory responsibility or be in a position of authority which he could again abuse.\" Moss reviewed Salafsky's recommendation and concurred with it. On December 13, Moss wrote Broski requesting that he \"proceed with the removal of Dr. Levenstein from the faculty of the University of Illinois.\" On December 21, 1995, Broski wrote President James Stukel, to recommend that dismissal proceedings be commenced against Levenstein. The same day, B. also wrote Levenstein and advised him that \"effective immediately,\" he was relieved as head of the department of family and community medicine at Rockford, based upon Salafsky's recommendation. B. also informed Levenstein that he recommended to Stukel that \"dismissal procedures be commenced against you.\" 2. The Applicable University Statutes For Terminating a Faculty Member's Tenure Article X, \u00a7 1, \u00b6 d of the University statutes states that due cause for dismissal exists if: \"a faculty member's performance of University duties and functions or extramural conduct is found to demonstrate clearly and convincingly that the faculty member can no longer be relied upon to perform those duties . . .\" Further, \u00b6 e (1) of the University Statutes sets forth the procedure the President must follow prior to commencing tenure termination proceedings: (1) Charges. When it shall appear to the president that cause of the dismissal of an appointee may exist, the president shall consult with 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/23 the Faculty Advisory Committee [\"FAC\"]. The president, after such consultation, shall determine whether dismissal proceedings should be instituted. Charges looking to dismissal shall be preferred by statement in writing by the president or the president's designee and shall be filed with the clerk or secretary within thirty days after consultation with the Faculty Advisory Committee. The statement shall be sufficiently specific to reasonably inform the appointee of the nature of the charges and enable the appointee to present a defense to them. Section 1, \u00b6 e (8) governs the president's power to reassign a tenured member while considering their dismissal: (8) Reassignment of Duties. Under exceptional circumstances, and when such action is clearly necessary and justified, the president may direct that a faculty member be relieved of some or all of the faculty member's University duties and functions and reassigned to others, without prejudice and without loss of compensation, pending the final decision of the case, subject to the following provisions: (a) the president may reassign duties before the filing of any charges only after giving notice to the chair or, in the absence of the chair from the University to some member of the Faculty Advisory Committee, that the president believes that cause for dismissal may exist; (b) if the president reassigns those duties after so giving notice to the chair or some member of the Faculty Advisory Committee, such reassignment shall terminate within thirty days after that committee has made its recommendations to the president unless the president initiates dismissal proceedings by the filing of charges for dismissal within that thirty-day period; and (c) if the president initiates dismissal proceedings by filing charges for dismissal, the president may reassign duties or extend a previous reassignment of duties until the termination of those proceedings or until the effective day of dismissal if the proceedings should result in dismissal. 3. Stukel Enters the Process 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/23 On January 2, 1996, while Levenstein was still serving the May 11, 1995 suspension, he wrote Stukel, beseeching him to terminate the suspension and allow him to return to work. Levenstein expressed his frustration at being suspended unfairly and characterized the University's contemplation of whether to pursue termination hearings against him as a stunt designed to coerce him into resigning. On January 9, Stukel replied, stating that the decision of whether to pursue termination proceedings was still pending. Stukel advised Levenstein that he needed to complete his review of the case material and then seek the guidance of the on how to proceed. He urged patience, assured Levenstein that he viewed the matter \"most seriously,\" but determined that \"in the mean time, the status quo will continue.\" In February 1996, the status quo changed when Broski reassigned Levenstein to the task of reviewing and critiquing \u2014 from home \u2014 medical video tapes, such as: \"Lyme Disease, An Outdoor Menace;\" \"Lipid Consensus Conference;\" \"Persistent Vegetative State;\" \"The Quiet Touch \u2014 The Gift of Listening \u2014 The Gift of Understanding and The Gift of Comfort;\" \"Just Like You and Me.\" Levenstein's protests to this reassignment went unanswered. 4. The FAC's Advice and Counsel On February 1, 1996, Broski forwarded Stukel a proposed draft of charges that he recommended for proceeding on the termination of Levenstein's tenured status. On February 7, Stukel forwarded the draft charges to the FAC, requesting their opinion of them and seeking their advice and counsel. On April 16, 1996, the responded to Stukel. Their report stated that although Stukel asked them to assume that the \"allegations contained in the proposed chargers to be true,\" the stated that the University Statutes require that \"it is necessary for us to look beyond the four corners of the charges in order to properly answer your questions.\" This aspect of their role was significant to the for at least two reasons. First, while the charges of sexual harassment against Levenstein were \"highly material to his capacity to perform,\" they did not go \"to the issue of his basic abilities, which most conclude are entirely satisfactory.\" Secondly, the was \"also concerned\" about Levenstein's charges of financial 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/23 improprieties and believed that the charges of sexual harassment against him could not \"be viewed solely without regard to the mileau in which they have arisen.\" Thus, the evidence suggests that the suspected that the business of Levenstein's termination was limited to his inquiries about perceived financial irregularities. In their report, the stated that there was \"no room for serious contention\" but that \"several\" of the charges against Levenstein were valid. Nevertheless, the expressed its uncertainty of the strength of the evidence of sexual harassment against Levenstein. Specifically, they stated that \"in good conscience, we cannot, even for purposes of giving you advice, simply assume all the charges to be true . . . it appears to us that, in at least some cases, the evidence already garnered is not particularly persuasive, nor the conduct, if proved, necessarily wrongful.\" (emphasis theirs) The FAC's most significant \"problem\" with the case against Levenstein was whether it proved that his \"future performance . . . will be professionally substandard.\" That is, whether the evidence of Levenstein's past conduct \"clearly and convincingly\" predicted that he would be unable to perform his duties. On this score, the stated that \"we advise that the standard would not be met on this record . . .\" First, the considered \"that those closest to this investigation,\" meaning the and particularly Adams, \"believe that the nature of the claims of misconduct against Levenstein may be appropriately addressed through a plan of remediation.\" In its judgment, the stated that this recommendation did \"not support Dr. Salafsky's contention that such an assignment cannot be implemented.\" The clearly viewed with great reservation Salafsky's rejection of the AAP's recommendations: [I]n what we conclude to be rather summary fashion, [Salafsky and the appeal panel] have indicated that Dr. Adams' recommendations could not be implemented. We cannot credit Dr. Salafsky's contrary statement with great weight in advising you and certainly cannot conclude that his statement would meet the clear and convincing test if subjected to careful scrutiny. The record which we have reviewed indicates that there are managerial disputes between Dr. Salafsky and Dr. Levenstein which may well give rise to bias on his 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/23 part, leading in turn to an inference that his conclusions on remediation could be less than objective. This is reflected in what appears to us to be the overly aggressive approach he may have taken in the crucial time frame in early May, 1995 . . . The stated that while it considered Levenstein \"unrepentant,\" it nevertheless \"remain[ed] unconvinced that a meaningful effort ha[d] been made to correct Dr. Levenstein's likely errant conduct.\" It concluded its report to Stukel, by advising \"that the charges and the surrounding circumstances as we have cited them above do not give rise to a finding favorable to a termination at this time.\" They suggested instead a reassignment of duties consistent with Adams' recommendations. 5. Levenstein Resigns The University Statutes provided Stukel thirty days from the date he received the report of the to decide whether to proceed with Levenstein's termination or terminate the suspension. On April 23, 1996, before the time period elapsed, Levenstein resigned. The evidence neither shows that someone alerted Levenstein that the report of the was submitted, nor that Levenstein inquired if the report had been submitted. His resignation letter to Stukel approaches the rhetorical histrionics of General Douglas MacArthur's 1951 farewell address to the joint session of Congress. In fairness though, it is important to note that he had served just shy of a year, in near idleness under Stukel's \"status quo\" regime. And by all indications, he was unaware that the had just issued its report, supporting many of his arguments and recommending that he not be terminated. His letter reads in part have persevered for 11-1/2 months under the incredible burden of unsupported allegations and public humiliation in the hope that someone would listen to the truth. To be frank, you were my last hope . . . Four and a half months later, you appear to be no closer to bringing this matter to a close . . .\" Levenstein contends that he saw no alternative but to resign, certain that the system had been rigged against him and that no resolution was in sight 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/23 A. Procedural Due Process Claim \u2014 Constructive Discharge Theory 1. Deprivation of a Property Right In their motion for summary judgment, defendants argue that Levenstein was not deprived of property without due process because he was suspended with pay. They contend that there is no property interest in the non- pecuniary aspects of employment. Furthermore, defendants argue that the evidence shows that the continued suspension of Levenstein was the appropriate way to proceed because there was a hazard of keeping him on the job. Since Levenstein resigned prior to the commencement pretermination process, defendants argue that he waived his due process rights and has no right upon which to assert them now. The University characterizes Levenstein's departure as his preference to facing termination proceedings. Levenstein counters that what the University describes as his voluntary resignation was, in fact, the result of his constructive discharge. Specifically, Levenstein argues that he was never given a choice between resigning or facing termination proceedings. Rather, Levenstein asserts that \"Stukel had not decided whether to seek termination (and thus provide `termination proceedings')\" consistent with Article of the University Statutes despite the fact that the University had placed him on suspension for nearly a year. Levenstein argues that although he was suspended with pay, he was subjected to intolerable working conditions, withering on the suspension vine, given make-work assignments that were an \"insult\" to someone of his professional stature. It is undisputed that as a member of the tenured faculty, Levenstein had a property right in his job under state law. Levenstein v. Salafsky, 164 F.3d 345, 351 (7th Cir. 1998); see Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601, 92 S.Ct. 2694 (1972); see Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 (1972). Thus, under the Fourteenth Amendment, he is entitled to due process before being deprived of this constitutionally property interest. Parrett v. City of Connersville, 737 F.2d 690, 693-94 (7th Cir. 1984). Due process requires that a pre-termination hearing be held. Cleveland v. Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542, 105 S.Ct. 1487 (1985); Schacht v. Wisc. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 14/23 Dep't of Corrections, 175 F.3d 497, 502 (7th Cir. 1999), receded from on other grounds by, Higgins v. Mississippi, 217 F.3d 951 (7th Cir. 2000). Suspension of an employee with pay pending the termination process does not violate a constitutional right. Id.; Levenstein, 164 F.3d at 351. In Loudermill, the Supreme Court of the United States held that suspension with pay of an employee with a constitutionally protected property interest was appropriate when the employer \"perceives a significant hazard in keeping the employee on the job.\" Id. at 470 U.S. at 544-45, 105 S.Ct. at 1495. The Court also held that \"[a]t some point,\" a delay in the termination process would become a constitutional violation. That determination rests on whether the delay is unreasonably prolonged. Id. at 470 U.S. at 547, 105 S.Ct. at 1496. Thus, defendants' suspension of Levenstein with pay does not alone state a claim for the deprivation of a constitutionally protected right. That is not, however, the argument put forth in Levenstein's procedural due process claim. When an employee has been constructively discharged, meaning that his working conditions were made so miserable that he was compelled to quit, he has suffered a deprivation of property, \"and the only question would then be whether he was given due process of law.\" Parrett. 737 F.2d at 694. In Parrett, the plaintiff was the chief of detectives on an Indiana town police force. He became involved in a forgery investigation which led to the daughter of one of the town's prominent citizens. The plaintiff and the father exchanged angry words over this, and the daughter was never prosecuted few years later, the father rose to a high office in the town and he asked the plaintiff to quit. The plaintiff refused, but the father did not let the matter end there. The town eventually removed the plaintiff as chief, reassigning him to an inferior position albeit at the same pay. He was given a windowless office fashioned from a broom closet and he spent his shift with nothing to do. Eventually, when the enforced idleness was too much to bear, he suffered a breakdown and took medical retirement. The Seventh Circuit ruled that the plaintiff was constructively discharged when it was apparent to him that he would not be given any work to do. Id. at 694. The court held that the enforced idleness was a \"humiliating counterpoint\" to plaintiff's career that 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 15/23 could have the effect of irrevocably damaging his professional skills: \"For anyone with some self-respect the position that [defendants] placed [plaintiff] in was intolerable . . .\" Id.; see also, Rabinovitz v. Pena, 89 F.3d 482, 489 (7th Cir. 1996) (a plaintiff alleging constructive discharge must show that \"conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would have been compelled to resign.\") Therefore, the defendants in Parrett, through constructive discharge, had deprived the plaintiff of a constitutionally protected property right. In Tweedall v. Fritz, 987 F. Supp. 1126, 1132 (S.D.Ind. 1997), cited by the defendants, the district court in the Southern District of Indiana held that paid suspension of a middle school teacher accused of sexual misconduct was appropriate to protect the investigation against him as well as preventing more similar conduct by the accused. In Tweedall, plaintiff allegedly inappropriately touched and made sexually-oriented remarks to his middle school students. After Tweedall was confronted about the allegations, the school's principal expressed concern that Tweedall's continued presence at the school could jeopardize the investigation. Shortly thereafter, the defendants suspended him with full pay and benefits pending the outcome of the investigation. The court ruled that the suspension did not abridge Tweedall's procedural due process rights since he retained his pay and benefits. Thus, the court reasoned, Tweedall's only concern was the \"apparent stigmatization\" from being suspended. Id. at 1132. The court held that while the stigma he suffered from the suspension was appreciable, the school \"was faced with a need to protect middle school children from their teacher's sexual harassment.\" Id. Specifically, the court noted that the government had a substantial interest in protecting impressionable young students. Also, the court held that the immediate suspension was necessary to pursue the investigation and prevent Tweedall, if the accusations were true, from repeating those actions. Id. Tweedall argued that the suspension was a constructive discharge, stating that he suffered extreme psychological effects as a result. The district court held that the constructive discharge claim failed because no evidence suggested that the defendants intended for Tweedall to quit \"or that their actions were calculated to bring about that result.\" Id. at 1134. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 16/23 Defendants argue that this case is similar to Tweedall in that Levenstein's paid suspension was justified because it enabled the University to: conduct its investigation against him, hear Levenstein's appeal, and deliberate about whether to proceed with Levenstein's termination. Certainly, as Loudermill and Tweedall illustrate, sometimes circumstances dictate that an employee accused of sexual harassment should be removed from his position to expedite and protect the integrity of the investigation against him, as well as to protect those who might be the target of more inappropriate behavior. When viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, however, the evidence in this case presents what the Tweedall court expressly held was absent \u2014 a triable issue of whether the suspension, as well as the conditions of Levenstein's reassignment, were imposed by defendants in bad faith \u2014 with the intention of forcing Levenstein to resign. Specifically, genuine issues of fact remain about why Salafsky did not end Levenstein's suspension and reassign him consistent with the recommendations set forth by the AAP. In his May 11, 1995 letter, Salafsky indicates that the AAP's investigation and recommendations would influence the course of Levenstein's future at the University. Yet, when the investigation concluded the following July, Salafsky did not follow their recommendations to allow Levenstein to return to the classroom and hospital. Instead, the terms of the suspension went unchanged and for more than nine months after the investigation concluded, Levenstein was forbidden to see patients or conduct class. Additionally, the evidence shows that while the University was deciding whether to pursue Levenstein's termination, he was given old medical training videos to watch and critique. For a physician with Levenstein's reputation, defendants, by both forbidding him to advance his professional career and assigning him work for which he was extremely overqualified to perform, raises the issue, as it did in Parrett, whether his nearly one-year long suspension constituted a constructive discharge. 2. Denial of Due Process Defendants' argue that even if Levenstein was deprived of a property interest, he still received sufficient due process prior to his resignation. Defendants point out that Levenstein received notice of the charges against 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 17/23 him, an explanation of the employer's evidence, and an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, defendants contend that they provided Levenstein with the essential elements of due process. However, because he resigned before Stukel decided whether to proceed with pre-termination proceedings, he waived his right to the pre-termination process and cannot complain that he was not afforded procedural due process. Levenstein counters that the entire process, regardless of whatever the methods the University Statutes assured, was a \"kangaroo court,\" engineered by the defendants to run him out of the University claim of violation of procedural due process requires that a plaintiff not only show that he has been deprived of a property right, but also that he was denied due process of law. Parrett, 737 F.2d at 694. However, even if an accused is given notice of the charges and the evidence against him, \"if the charges are a sham through and through, there has not been a constitutionally sufficient opportunity to respond.\" Levenstein, 164 F.3d at 351. Fair procedure requires an unbiased decisionmaker. See e.g., Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 271, 90 S.Ct. 1011 (1970); Schacht, 175 F.3d at 502; Doe v. Board Educ. of Oak Park River Forest High Sch. Dist. 200, 115 F.3d 1273, 1283 (7th Cir. 1997) Therefore, the court cannot grant the defendants' motion if a genuine issue of fact exists to support Levenstein's contention: that his suspension was the result of defendants' animus and its procedures a sham. Defendants argue that allegations of sham proceedings require a plaintiff to demonstrate proof that the alleged misconduct was so outrageous as to \"shock the conscience,\" citing to Schacht's discussion of the required quantum of proof to maintain that actions of state officials violated a plaintiff's substantive due process rights. 175 F.3d at 502. On the other hand, the court in Schacht held that allegations of procedural due process violations \"offers explicit textual protection against a sham set of procedures used to deprive someone of a protected property interest\" which guarantees \"fair procedures in an unbiased decisionmaker,\" to ensure \"honesty in the process.\" Id. The Seventh Circuit did not hold that unfairness or the existence of bias in a procedural due process claim can only be demonstrated by evidence that shocks the conscious. In Schacht, the plaintiff's procedural due process claim eventually failed because he did not \"present record evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact\" 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 18/23 that the defendants conspired against him, and used the pre-termination process \"as a vehicle for achieving their illicit goals.\" Id. at 504. Thus, a \"factual basis\" to support allegations of procedural due process violations is required; but not proof that shocks the conscience. Id. Viewed most favorably to Levenstein, the evidence shows that he could maintain that defendants were biased, wanted to see him leave the University, and that the process was a stacked deck against him. \"No matter how complete the panoply of procedural devices which protect a particular liberty or property interest,\" the Seventh Circuit holds, \"due process also requires that those procedures be neutrally applied.\" Ciechon v. City of Chicago, 686 F.2d 511, 517 (7th Cir. 1982). Given that Levenstein vociferously challenged Salafsky on what he believed to be fiscal mal/misfeasance at Rockford, the evidence allows Levenstein to pursue his claim that defendants were biased. Salafsky's recommendation to Broski, which set the wheels in motion on the road to Levenstein's termination, is counter to the primary recommendation given to him from the AAP's report. Levenstein could make the argument that Salafsky's stated reason that Adams' recommendation did not account for the fact that Levenstein would have to have one-on-one contact with students and patients if he returned was simply pretext for wanting him dismissed. How could it be, Levenstein might argue, that after a two-month long investigation by the AAP, Salafsky could honestly think that it would never have dawned on Adams, while pondering her recommendation, that Levenstein would have occasion to be exposed to students, nurses, and patients if he was allowed to return to the classroom and hospital? Yet, Salafsky's letter to B. implies that the AAP's report, if not faulty, at least did not thoroughly consider the consequences of its recommendations. To be sure, Salafsky was not bound by the recommendations, and Adams carefully stated that Levenstein should be removed if a feasible arrangement for Levenstein to remain could not be devised. Yet Salafsky's letter to Broski, which essentially brushed aside the recommendations, breathes life into Levenstein's suspicions that Salafsky was motivated primarily by wanting to see him dismissed from the University. The certainly implied as much in its report to Stukel, when it said that Salafsky's recommendation appeared \"overly aggressive.\" Its report was 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 19/23 unquestionably suspicious of Salafsky's zealousness to have Levenstein remain suspended even after the thorough investigation counseled otherwise. Thus, the court rules that there exists a triable issue here \u2014 whether bias against Levenstein spoiled the process. For these reasons, the court cannot grant the defendants' motion. B. Equal Protection Claim Defendants also attack Levenstein's equal protection claim on the basis of selective prosecution. Defendants contend that Levenstein cannot identify any similarly situated person/s, identical in all respects to him who have been treated more favorably. Moreover, defendants contend that in the time Levenstein was employed at the University, four other tenured administrators who were the subject of sexual harassment allegations were treated similarly to him. Selective prosecution \"violates the equal protection clause `where the decision to prosecute is made either in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutional right, such as the right to free speech or to the free exercise of religion.'\" Levenstein, 164 F.3d at 352; quoting Esmail v. Macrane, 53 F.3d 176, 179 (7th Cir. 1995). In Esmail, the Seventh Circuit held \"[i]f the power of government is brought to bear on a harmless individual merely because a powerful state or local official harbors a malignant animosity toward him, the individual ought to have a remedy in federal court.\" 53 F.3d at 179. The Seventh Circuit noted, when reviewing the sufficiency of his pleadings, that \"Levenstein has alleged malice and a motive to retaliate against him personally because of his belief that certain financial transactions needed to be reviewed and that his superiors might be covering up financial irregularities. That is enough to put his case squarely into the pattern we recognized in Esmail.\" Id. at 353. Now at the summary judgment phase, if Levenstein supports with evidence the allegations of defendants' malice, he may pursue the equal protection claim on the basis of selective enforcement. The court finds that the evidence provides enough support for Levenstein to survive summary judgment on this issue. Whether he was correct or not, it appears that Levenstein was vocal about what he perceived as financial irregularities under Salafsky's watch. While Levenstein's 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 20/23 suggestion that Salafsky manufactured a sexual harassment case against Levenstein where the basis for one did not otherwise exist, seems far- fetched and is not supported with credible evidence. However, the issue remains whether, once Salafsky was advised of the complaints against Levenstein, that he maliciously proceeded full throttle in the direction of pursuing his dismissal \u2014 over the recommendations of the University's investigatory body, the AAP. Thus a narrow opening for Levenstein to proceed with the selective prosecution claim survives; specifically addressing Salafsky's disregard for the AAP's counsel, his decision not to lift the suspension once he received it, and his recommendation of dismissal to Broski over the AAP's judgment. C. Defendants' Qualified Immunity Argument Finally, defendants' argue they are entitled to qualified immunity from liability as individuals. Generally, public officials are entitled to qualified immunity from \"liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.\" Id. at 350. Whether a public official may be held personally liable turns on an objective legal standard and \"a defense of qualified immunity may not be rebutted by evidence that the defendant's conduct was malicious or otherwise improperly motivated. Evidence concerning the defendant's subjective intent is simply irrelevant to that defense.\" Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 588, 118 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 (1998); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, (1982); Townsend v. Vallas, 256 F.3d 661, 672 (7th Cir. 2001). The Seventh Circuit has held that actions for personal liability turn on the \"objective legal reasonableness of the action, assessed in light of the legal rules that were clearly established at the time it was taken.\" Vallas, 256 F.3d at 672 (quotations omitted). To be \"clearly established,\" Vallas articulated, \"the contours of a right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he or she is doing violates that right.\" Id.; see Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640, 107 S.Ct. 3034 (1987). When evaluating a claim of qualified immunity, the Seventh Circuit counsels a court to \"first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 21/23 of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.\" Vallas, 256 F.3d at 672. Above, the court has concluded that Levenstein has demonstrated sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment on his two constitutional claims: the procedural due process claim and the equal protection claim. However, Levenstein completely fails to support his argument that any of the individual defendants should have known that they were allegedly abridging his constitutional rights. Instead, he cites to the Seventh Circuit's opinion which reviewed his case for the sufficiency of the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12. He argues that \"until all genuine issues of material fact are resolved at trial,\" the Seventh Circuit's ruling bars a finding of qualified immunity. This argument flies in the face of the purpose of summary judgment. Even the portion of the Seventh Circuit's opinion he quotes in his response brief includes the following: \"We decided today only that, for the purposes of the motion for failure to state a claim, the district court properly denied the University defendants' claim of qualified immunity . . .\" Levenstein, 164 F.3d at 353. At the summary judgment phase, Levenstein is required to support his arguments with evidence, including a response to the defense of qualified immunity. For these reasons, the defendants' motion is granted on this issue in favor of the individual defendants For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is in part and in part. The motion is for the individual defendants and against Levenstein. However, defendants' motion is with respect to Levenstein's constitutional claims ORDERED. About us Jobs 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 22/23 News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, 97 c 3430 | Casetext Search + Citator 23/23", "7744_103.pdf": "Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff- appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2005) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 414 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2005) Argued September 21, 2004 Decided July 11, 2005 Richard R. Winter, Sarah E. Pace (argued), Holland & Knight, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff- Appellant. Carla J. Rozycki (argued), Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees. Before MANION, ROVNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges. WOOD, Circuit Judge. In this case, we reach the d\u00e9nouement of the lawsuit that Dr. Joseph H. Levenstein has been pursuing against three officials of the medical school of the University of Illinois located in Rockford, Illinois. When the case was last before this court, we affirmed the district court's interlocutory ruling that the defendant university officials were not entitled to qualified immunity. Levenstein v. Salafsky, 164 F.3d 345 (7th Cir. 1998) (Levenstein I). 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 1/11 Eventually, the district court conducted a bench trial, after which it found that Levenstein had not shown that he had been constructively discharged, nor had he established an equal protection violation. The court accordingly entered judgment in favor of the defendants. This time it is Levenstein who is appealing. Although we have no trouble imagining how a trier of fact might have ruled in his favor, that is not the proper standard of review at this stage of the litigation. The district court's findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, nor do we find legal error in its opinion. We therefore affirm. * Levenstein joined the medical school faculty of the University of Illinois in Rockford in 1990, as a tenure-track professor, after a distinguished career in South Africa that we described in Levenstein I, 164 F.3d at 348. Before the events giving rise to this lawsuit, he served as the head of the Department of Family and Community Medicine (the Department), first for the Rockford campus, and later for all four University of Illinois campuses. He was granted tenure in 1992. In 1994. Dean Bernard Salafsky, one of the defendants and Levenstein's immediate supervisor, recommended Levenstein for a Faculty of the Year Award and nominated him for the Pugh Charitable Trust \"Primary Care Achievement Award.\" In 1995, Levenstein became the chair of the University of Illinois College of Medicine Primary Care Institute. Starting around the middle of 1994, however, two events began to unfold: first, Levenstein and Salafsky had a falling-out over the financing and management of the University's Medical Service Plan (MSP), which was a fund designed to cover varlous medical school operating expenses like faculty salaries and maintenance; second, in the spring of 1995, defendant Patricia A. Gill, the Deputy Chancellor of Affirmative Action Programs (AAP), received an anonymous letter from a medical student alleging that Levenstein had sexually harassed her. Levenstein saw the University's response to the sexual harassment complaint as a veiled effort to undermine his efforts to understand deficits in the budgets of the and the Department and to expose financial mismanagement. Briefly, the financial dispute began when Salafsky's office revealed in mid-1994 that the might be facing a cumulative deficit of an amount significantly greater than its operational losses of approximately $280,000 in 1993 and $260,000 in 1994. Over Salafsky's objection, Levenstein led the formation of an executive committee to serve as a \"watchdog\" over Salafsky's administration. Later that year, Salafsky proposed the construction of a new specialty clinic to be called the East Side Clinic. Levenstein and the other watchdog committee members agreed that such a clinic would be desirable, but questioned whether the could afford it and whether it could be justified from an educational standpoint. As time went on, Levenstein asked more and more questions about the $400,000 deficit and the projected $500,000 departmental deficit, but Salafsky 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 2/11 was unresponsive. On April 19, 1995, the two had a confrontation at an executive committee meeting. Dr. Frank Chmelik, Chair of the Rockford MSP, approached Salafsky in an effort to resolve the problem. Ominously, Salafsky told Chmelik that \"there was a much larger problem than this that would become more obvious over the ensuing weeks.\" Salafsky was referring to the anonymous harassment complaint, which Gill had received only two days earlier, on April 17. On April 27, Gill forwarded a copy of the letter to Levenstein and to Salafsky. She advised Levenstein that there would be no investigation unless the anonymous complainant came forward. On May 1, a physician at Rockford who had worked with Levenstein contacted Gill to report inappropriate conduct by Levenstein. She, too, did not reveal her identity to Gill until later, but she did pass along her complaint to her immediate supervisor. On May 8, two more similar complaints came in, this time from two of Levenstein's departmental support staff. Salafsky was told about the later complaints. On May 11, Salafsky and the Associate Regional Dean, Dr. Donald Wortmann, met with Levenstein to discuss the sexual harassment complaints. They told him that if he did not resign effective 5:00 pm that day, he would be suspended with pay pending the outcome of an investigation. As of the time of that meeting, no formal complaints had yet been filed, although Salafsky knew both the identities of some of the complainants and that they wished to pursue formal charges. After hearing all of this, Levenstein telephoned Gill to confirm what had been happening. At the end of the day, Salafsky suspended Levenstein with pay as promised. The next day, Salafsky called a meeting of the faculty at which he announced Levenstein's suspension and the circumstances that had prompted it. He said, inaccurately, that Gill had received four letters in the last month; in fact, she had received only the one anonymous letter. Formal letters were not long in coming, however. On May 17, the author of the anonymous letter came forward, wrote a new letter, and signed a formal complaint. The two support staff members did likewise, and on May 21, the three women filed a joint \"Request for Action\" form. With this in hand, Gill opened an investigation. On May 24, Gill informed Levenstein about the specifics of the complaints and outlined the investigation process. He was permitted to respond in writing to the allegations, which he did, denying any sexually offensive conduct. Gill completed her investigation on July 23. She submitted a report concluding that Levenstein had violated the University's sexual harassment policy to her supervisor, the head of AAP. The supervisor agreed and made two recommendations in the alternative: either Levenstein should be restricted for three years from exercising authority over female subordinates, with the exception of restrictions on 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 3/11 classroom instruction, lecturing, and patient treatment; or, if it was not possible to create an arrangement that permitted him to perform fully as a member of the faculty, he should be terminated. Levenstein submitted an appeal from the AAP's findings and recommendations on August 9 to defendant David C. Broski, the Chancellor of the University. Broski assembled a three- person Faculty Appeal Panel with help from Gill to handle the appeal. The panel conducted its own investigation; it gave Levenstein the opportunity to comment on various witness statements and to make a final statement. Its report, issued on November 20, essentially agreed with Gill's initial conclusion that Levenstein had engaged in offensive conduct. It made no recommendations for corrective action, but it observed that the earlier recommendation was contradictory and could not be carried out. On December 21, 1995, Broski recommended to the president of the University, James J. Stukel, that Levenstein's tenure should be reviewed \"with the intent to revoke.\" Broski also advised President Stukel that Levenstein had been placed on paid leave pending the out- come of the investigatory proceedings. At the same time, Broski notified Levenstein that he was relieved of his duties as department head and that Broski had recommended to Stukel that dismissal proceedings be commenced. Stukel accepted that recommendation on January 6, 1996, and concluded that Levenstein should remain suspended. He communicated this to Levenstein, described the dismissal procedure, and indicated that he would seek the advice of the Faculty Advisory Committee after he reviewed the relevant materials. On February 7, 1996, he asked for the Committee's recommendation whether tenure revocation proceedings should begin. He also ordered that Levenstein be given other duties, without changing his compensation (which had remained in place throughout this period). Charles Lane Rice, the Vice Dean of the College of Medicine, assigned Levenstein the menial task of reviewing and evaluating medical videotapes for content and accuracy. In the meantime, Levenstein, frustrated by what he perceived to be the slow pace of the proceedings, bias on the part of decisionmakers, and the pretextual nature of the actions being taken against him, brought charges of academic misconduct against Salafsky and other administrators at the Rockford campus. The Faculty Advisory Committee advised President Stukel that they would take up the question of Levenstein's termination after they had assessed Levenstein's charges against Salafsky. The Committee's result was partially favorable, partially unfavorable to Levenstein. Although it reported on April 15 that it found no merit in Levenstein's charges against 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 4/11 Salafsky, the next day it recommended to Stukel that he should not pursue termination of Levenstein's tenure. Instead, the Committee thought, the less drastic measures of reassignment and rehabilitation were appropriate. In coming to this recommendation, the Committee said that it perceived \"no room for serious contention\" that \"several\" of the charges against Levenstein were valid; nonetheless, it also indicated that some of the charges were \"not particularly persuasive,\" some of the conduct was not necessarily wrongful, and in some instances Levenstein's actions \"may be subject to an innocent interpretation.\" The Committee reported its strong reservations on the question whether the allegations proved that Levenstein's future performance would be \"professionally substandard.\" The Committee did not copy Levenstein or any other administrators on its recommendation to Stukel, nor did Stukel tell Levenstein the gist of the Committee's findings. Before Stukel had a chance to make a decision on the case, Levenstein pretermitted the process by tendering his resignation in a letter dated April 23, 1996. Stukel accepted. Had Levenstein not resigned, Stukel would have been free to accept, reject, or modify the Committee's recommendation. If he had chosen to pursue tenure termination, University statutes provided for a hearing at which Levenstein would have had an opportunity to present his case and for an appeals process On September 27, 1995, while the University proceedings we have just described were still underway, Levenstein filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 against the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Salafsky, Gill, and Broski. He later dropped his claims against the Board of Trustees and filed an additional complaint in the district court, but the cases were eventually consolidated both in the district court and here, and so we treat them all as one. After this court affirmed the district court's decision rejecting the defendants' claim of qualified immunity in Levenstein I, the case continued on to the merits. On February 4, 2002, the district court issued a memorandum and order in which it found that genuine issues of fact existed on three questions: whether Levenstein's procedural due process rights had been violated; whether his suspension was really the result of the defendants' animus and the procedures a sham; and whether he had been the victim of selective enforcement in violation of his equal protection rights. In the same memorandum, however, the court found that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity insofar as these claims were brought against them in their individual capacities. It did so on the ground that Levenstein could not show under these circumstances that the defendants 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 5/11 should have known that their actions were violating his rights. See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S. Ct. 2151, 150 L. Ed. 2d 272 (2001). It properly noted that this court's opinion in Levenstein was premised on the fact that the defendants' initial motion was based exclusively on the pleadings, and thus did not preclude the district court from revisiting the immunity issue on the basis of a fuller record. See Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 307, 116 S. Ct. 834, 133 L. Ed. 2d 773 (1996). After making that ruling, the court went on to hold a bench trial. Although it did not spell out what relief was still possible, the only thing could have been the prospective injunctive relief of reinstatement that Levenstein had requested. Levenstein originally brought his suit against the three University defendants in both their official and personal capacities. The qualified immunity ruling spelled the end of his personal capacity claims for damages. As officials of the University of Illinois, which is functionally the State of Illinois for purposes of \u00a7 1983, the defendants were not \"persons\" who could be sued in their official capacity for damages. See Will v. Mich. Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71, 109 S. Ct. 2304, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1989). Nevertheless, under the well-recognized theory of Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S. Ct. 441, 52 L. Ed. 714 (1908), Levenstein was entitled to pursue injunctive relief against them for actions they took in violation of his constitutional rights. See Verizon Md., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm. of Md., 535 U.S. 635, 645, 122 S. Ct. 1753, 152 L. Ed. 2d 871 (2002); Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 167 n. 14, 105 S. Ct. 3099, 87 L. Ed. 2d 114 (1985). On September 5, 2003, the court ruled that Levenstein had not demonstrated that he had been constructively discharged and that he had not met his burden of showing a \"class of one\" equal protection violation. On appeal, Levenstein first attacks the district court's conclusion that he failed to prove that the defendants were \"out to get him\" and that the process they used was a sham. He also argues that the court erred by failing to find that his forced idleness, coupled with the sham procedures, amounted to a constructive discharge, and by rejecting his equal protection claim. Finally, he cursorily takes issue with the court's decision with respect to the defendants' qualified immunity * We begin with the qualified immunity argument, since Levenstein's chances of any damages relief against the individual defendants are dependent on this point. The district court's explanation of why it was conferring qualified immunity was regrettably brief. Unfortunately, so was Levenstein's treatment of this point in his brief on appeal. Indeed, it was so abbreviated that we are tempted to say that he has forfeited the right to pursue this argument. 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 6/11 We have no need to explore the forfeiture issue, however, for a straightforward reason. In the end, as the defendants point out, it makes no difference to this case whether the district court's immunity ruling was correct or not proper treatment of the qualified immunity issue requires the court first to decide whether the officer's conduct violated a constitutional right, taking the facts in the light most favorable to the party asserting the injury. Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201, 121 S. Ct. 2151. If and only if so, then the court must determine whether the right was clearly established in the light of the specific context of the case. Id. Here, the court went on and conducted a full bench trial for purposes of deciding whether the defendants violated any of Levenstein's constitutional rights. It concluded, as we have already noted, that they did not. If this decision was correct, then there is nothing left of any potential damages claim in any event. We therefore have no need to decide how clearly the right to be free of sham proceedings and trumped-up charges was as of 1995 and 1996. Levenstein's case rises or falls on the soundness of the district court's analysis of the merits We begin our consideration of the merits with a reminder about the standard of review, which is the biggest hurdle that Levenstein must surmount. After a full bench trial, the district court's findings of fact may not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous. Cerros v. Steel Techs., Inc., 288 F.3d 1040, 1044 (7th Cir. 2002). This, as we have often vividly reminded parties, is a highly deferential standard. We review questions of law de novo; mixed questions of law or fact that do not involve constitutional rights are normally reviewed for clear error. See Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 288 F.3d 305, 307 (7th Cir. 2002). Levenstein's first argument applies, as he recognizes, to both his due process and his equal protection claims. He takes issue with the proposition that the defendants were proceeding against him in good faith. It is true that the district court made some findings that might be read as a finding that the investigation was unobjectionable. It noted, for instance, that the University was aware of a history of informal sexual harassment complaints against Levenstein, even though none of those complaints had resulted in formal proceedings. (Findings of Fact \u00b6\u00b6 26-30.) It found that the Faculty Appeal Panel (which did not include any of the defendants) \"consistently found Levenstein's version of events to be less credible than the complainants [sic].\" (Id. \u00b6 53.) Furthermore, and closer to the point, the court found that the University provided many procedures that Levenstein chose not to use (id. \u00b6 77), and that Levenstein was aware of those procedures. (Id. \u00b6 78.) In the end, however, the court never came to any final conclusion about the underlying motivations for the investigation. 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 7/11 Instead, the court found that in the final analysis, it was not the University that deprived Levenstein of any property right protected by the Constitution. It was he who chose to submit his resignation just before President Stukel was about to decide how to proceed. He elected to forgo numerous procedures before entities including the University's Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure and the Board of Trustees. Levenstein offers no reason for us to think that the Board, which had the ultimate responsibility to decide what to do, was biased, or that either the Committee or the Board would have refused to listen to his arguments about pretext and sham. The district court observed that Levenstein was not bringing an independent claim based on his suspension. The fact that he was receiving full pay throughout the period of the University's investigation may explain this decision. No matter. Upsetting and unpleasant though it surely would be to be the victim of false accusations of sexual misconduct from someone whose secret agenda was eliminating a critic, those accusations had not yet led the University to terminate Levenstein's position. The only question remaining with respect to the due process part of the case, to which we now turn, is whether the district court was mistaken to reject the constructive discharge argument The Supreme Court recently had occasion to address the topic of constructive discharge in the context of a Title hostile-environment claim. See Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 124 S. Ct. 2342, 2347, 159 L. Ed. 2d 204 (2004). The question whether the plaintiff had suffered a constructive discharge was important because it determined whether the employer was entitled to raise an affirmative defense to the charge. Suders held that in order to establish a constructive discharge, such a plaintiff had to prove both harassing behavior sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment, and that \"the abusive working environment became so intolerable that her resignation qualified as a fitting response.\" Id. at 2347. Although Levenstein's case relies on the due process clause rather than Title VII, the general approach to constructive discharge outlined in Suders is equally applicable here. For him, the central issue is whether, as he asserts, it was the University that deprived him of his protected property interest in his tenured position on the faculty, or if, as the district court concluded, he chose to leave. Levenstein relies on this court's decision in Parrett v. City of Connersville, 737 F.2d 690, 694 (7th Cir. 1984), in which we held that an employee is constructively discharged if \"his working conditions were made so miserable that he was forced to quit.\" In Parrett, we found that standard met when a police detective was literally forced to sit in a windowless 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 8/11 room that was formerly a broom closet and spend his entire shift with nothing to do. In Levenstein's view, his situation was identical in all material respects: he was put in a state of enforced idleness for almost a year, he was physically barred from campus, he was humiliated by Salafsky's statements and his removal as department head, and he was given the demeaning task of reviewing dusty old medical videotapes. He concludes that all of this, coupled with the alleged sham investigative procedures, amounted to a constructive discharge. We put to one side the investigative procedures, which we have already found had not run their course and thus cannot be labeled as \"sham\" taken as a whole. We see a subtle but important difference in the way that the Supreme Court phrased the test for a constructive discharge in Suders and the phrase Levenstein has taken from our Parrett opinion. One could read the excerpt from Parrett as establishing a purely subjective test for constructive discharge, because only the employee would know how miserable the working conditions made her feel. The Suders test, in contrast, is an objective one, as the Supreme Court made clear: Under the constructive discharge doctrine, an employee's reasonable decision to resign because of unendurable working conditions is assimilated to a formal discharge for remedial purposes.... The inquiry is objective: Did working conditions become so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee's position would have felt compelled to resign? 124 S. Ct. at 2351 (citation omitted number of facts lead us to answer that question in the negative. First, even Levenstein concedes that the allegations had been made against him, and that investigations were proceeding. Once such a process starts, for whatever reason, it is incumbent on the University to decide whether the complaints have merit, and if so, to decide what remedy is appropriate. If the complaints were made in bad faith or cannot be supported by the facts, the accused professor will be exonerated, which is the best that can be done even if he might have wished that the process had never begun in the first place. Second, unlike the policeman in Parrett, Levenstein's reassignment was explicitly temporary, pending the outcome of the investigation. Third, while eleven and a half months may have seemed like an eternity to Levenstein, in the real world it was not so long that his resignation could be called reasonable. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that at some point a delay in the termination process might become a constitutional violation. See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 547, 105 S. Ct. 1487, 84 L. Ed. 2d 494 (1985). There, however, the Court found that a nine-month adjudicatory period was not per se unconstitutionally 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 9/11 long, and it noted that the delay appeared to stem in part from the thoroughness of the procedures. The latter can also be said about Levenstein's case, and we do not see a difference of constitutional magnitude between nine months and twelve months, in the context of the elaborate procedural protections enjoyed by tenured university professors. We conclude that a person who is on leave with pay, with a temporary (though unsatisfying) reassignment pending an investigation of serious job misconduct, who resigns rather than waits for the conclusion of reasonable prescribed due process procedures of the institution, has not from an objective standpoint been constructively discharged. Indeed, to treat any reasonable pre-termination suspension with pay as a constructive discharge would create considerable tension with Supreme Court decisions like Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 544-45 (expressly stating that a suspension with pay prior to a pre-termination hearing is a valid option for a state employer). See also Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924, 929, 117 S. Ct. 1807, 138 L. Ed. 2d 120 (1997) (holding that suspensions without pay are also possible under some circumstances). However distasteful his temporary situation was, Levenstein's working conditions had not become so intolerable that a reasonable employee in his position would have felt compelled to resign. There is an inherent tension for any employee who is undergoing the kind of investigation that follows complaints of sexual harassment or other inappropriate conduct. Nothing in Suders equates this kind of tension with the intolerable working conditions that give rise to a constructive discharge or undermines the general Loudermill rule. We therefore agree with the district court's conclusion that Levenstein was not constructively discharged from the University. He voluntarily resigned, and thus the defendants acting in their official capacities did not deprive him of any protected property interest Levenstein's final theory relies on the \"class of one\" equal protection cases. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 120 S. Ct. 1073, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1060 (2000). Olech recognizes that a plaintiff states an equal protection claim where she \"has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and ... there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment.\" Albiero v. City of Kankakee, 246 F.3d 927, 932 (7th Cir. 2001) (citing Olech, 528 U.S. at 564, 120 S. Ct. 1073, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1060). We have recognized that a person may also state a claim under a \"class of one\" theory by showing that \"the government is treating unequally those individuals who are prima facie identical in all relevant respects, and that the cause of the differential treatment is a `totally illegitimate animus toward the plaintiff by the defendant.'\" See Nevel v. Village of 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 10/11 Schaumburg, 297 F.3d 673, 681 (7th Cir. 2002); Albiero, 246 F.3d at 932; Esmail v. Macrane, 53 F.3d 176, 180 (7th Cir. 1995). The district court rejected this theory because Levenstein failed to identify another similarly situated individual who was treated differently. He asserts that there is no need to point to such an individual if one is proceeding under the \"illegitimate animus\" approach. This, however, mistakes what we said in Albiero, and (worse) is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's description of the theory in Olech. Olech requires a showing of how the other similarly situated individuals have been treated. Albiero follows that guidance by requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate how he was unfavorably treated as compared with others who are otherwise identical to him. After the plaintiff shows the differential treatment, he must then prove that it flows from an illegitimate animus, not from inadvertence or some kind of permissible governmental classification. Even if we credited Levenstein's testimony that numerous other individuals who were accused of sexual harassment were not suspended pending an investigation or were not investigated at all, that would not be enough to prove this claim. First, this is far from a showing that these other individuals were identical to him in all relevant respects. See, e.g., Grayson v. O'Neill, 308 F.3d 808, 819 (7th Cir. 2002). Second, the district court found that the University had ample reason to investigate him apart from any illegitimate animus, in the form of the oral and written complaints it had received, both in the spring of 1995 and earlier. He has not convinced us that the district court clearly erred in finding those facts When all is said and done, both Levenstein and the defendant university officials had their day in court. With all the evidence before it, the court concluded that Levenstein was not constructively discharged, and thus that no action of the University deprived him of a protected property right. It also concluded that Levenstein had not proven that he was singled out for unfavorable disparate treatment in violation of his equal protection rights. We therefore the judgment of the district court. We also the defendants' motion to strike Levenstein's brief as unnecessary. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:02 Joseph H. Levenstein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, Defendants-appellees, 414 F.3\u2026 11/11", "7744_104.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Levenstein v. Salafsky United States District Court, N.D. Illinois Sep 5, 2003 NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) (N.D. Ill. Sep. 5, 2003) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Rethink the way you litigate with CoCounsel for research, discovery, depositions, and so much more. Try CoCounsel free NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) September 5, 2003 MANNING, District Judge Plaintiff Joseph H. Levenstein was a tenured medical school professor and administrator at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Rockford campus, until his resignation in 1996. Levenstein filed suit against three university officials, Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill and David C. Broski, alleging that Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 1/31 they effectively forced him to resign under a pretextual cloud of sexual harassment charges in violation of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. After denying Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the substantive constitutional claims, but granting their motion for summary judgment on their qualified immunity defenses, this Court held a bench trial. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, the Court hereby enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. The findings of fact are based upon careful consideration of the admissible evidence as well as this Court's own assessment of the credibility of the trial witnesses. To the extent that the findings of fact may be construed to be conclusions of law, they shall be deemed conclusions of law. See Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 113-14 *2 (1992). Likewise, to the extent the conclusions of law may be considered findings of fact, they shall be deemed findings of fact. See id. 2 I. Findings of Fact A. Levenstein and Salafsky 1. Joseph H. Levenstein is a family physician who was born and raised in South Africa. He practiced medicine in South Africa from 1969 until 1990. During that time, Levenstein earned an international reputation in the field of family and community medicine. Levenstein was widely-published, a frequent guest speaker at major professional functions, served on numerous professional committees, and enjoyed visiting professorships at fourteen universities around the world. 2. In May 1990, Levenstein left his position as head of the University of Capetown's Unit of General Practice in the Department of Community Health to become a tenure track professor and Head of the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Illinois' (\"the University\") College of Medicine at Rockford (\"Rockford\"). In November 1990, Levenstein was named Executive Head of the Family and Community Medicine Departments located at all four of the University's medical school campuses. In July 1992, the University awarded him tenure. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 2/31 3. Bernard Salafsky has been the Regional Dean at Rockford for approximately twenty years and was Levenstein's direct supervisor. During the first several years of Levenstein's employ at Rockford, Salafsky and Levenstein enjoyed an amicable professional relationship, marked by Salafsky's consistent professional support. In 1992, Salafsky gave Levenstein's application for tenure his \"wholehearted support.\" In March 1994, Salafsky \"wholeheartedly\" recommended Levenstein, from among hundreds of potential applicants, to receive a Faculty of the Year award. *3 On June 22, 1994, Salafsky nominated Levenstein for the Pugh Charitable Trust \"Primary Care Achievement Award.\" On that occasion, Salafsky described Levenstein as \"the quintessential role model, educator, mentor, colleague and gadfly.\" In February 1995, Salafsky supported Levenstein's appointment as Chairman of the University's College of Medicine Primary Care Institute. 3 B. The University's Medical Service Plan 4. To manage the revenues and expenses generated through the clinical practices of the University's medical school physician faculty members, the University formed a Medical Service Plan (\"MSP\") pursuant to the University of Illinois Hospital Act, 110 \u00a7 330/0.01. The was designed to provide an additional source of funding \u2014 separate from annual state appropriations \u2014 to cover the medical school's operating expenses such as faculty salaries, facilities maintenance, medical and office supplies, and malpractice insurance. 5. Under the organizational umbrella of the University's MSP, Rockford had its own (\"MSP-R\" or \"Plan\") by which Rockford's revenues and expenses were managed. The MSP-R's Management Committee bore ultimate responsibility for the general supervision and management of the MSP-R. Levenstein had substantial involvement in the fiscal management of the Plan. As a department head, Levenstein was responsible for the day-to- day operations and budget of his department which typically generated over half \u2014 approximately $4 million annually \u2014 of the Plan's gross billings. Additionally, Levenstein was a member of the MSP-R's Management Committee, which was comprised of Rockford's department heads and medical directors of the University's various clinics. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 3/31 6. Levenstein depended, in large part, on his department's revenues to fund his *4 department's ongoing operations revenues accounted for approximately 70% of his department's annual budget, with state and grant funds comprising the rest. 4 7. Salafsky, as Director of the MSP-R, oversaw administration of the Plan including billings, collections, expense payments and accounting practices. Salafsky was an ex officio member of both the MSP-R's Management and Executive Committee \u2014 he had voice but no vote. 8. In August 1994, over Salafsky's objections, but with Levenstein's strong support, an Executive Committee was formed to focus on the MSP-R's financial issues. 9. Beginning in April 1995, Levenstein began to inquire of several administrators, including Salafsky, about what he understood to be unexplained financial losses, resulting in a deficit that had been reported by Salafsky. At the same time, Levenstein was undergoing his annual departmental budget negotiations with Salafsky's administration. In addition to his concern about the perceived financial irregularities, Levenstein openly questioned the propriety of a Salafsky-endorsed plan to construct a new specialty clinic for Rockford's Obstetrics/ Gynecology and Pediatrics departments (the \"East Side Clinic\"). Although Levenstein accepted the need for the clinic, he had strong reservations about the MSP- R's ability to afford such a project. Levenstein began to request financial information from Salafsky's Plan administrators, although it appears that these requests may have been on par with requests made in earlier years at or around the time of budget negotiations. 10. Levenstein and Salafsky's relationship began to sour. There was open conflict at meetings, during which Salafsky \"would get real angry.\" 11. Sometime in April, 1995, Dr. Frank Chmelik, Chairman of the MSP-R, perceived the friction between Levenstein and Salafsky to be so disruptive that he approached Salafsky in an *5 attempt to iron out their differences. During this April 1995 meeting, Salafsky told Chmelik that \"there was a much larger problem than this that would become more obvious over the ensuing weeks.\" 5 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 4/31 C. Levenstein's Suspension 12. On April 17, 1995, Patricia Gill, Deputy Associate Chancellor of Affirmative Action Programs (\"AAP\"), received an \"anonymous\" letter from a medical student named Brenda Farm, describing alleged conduct by Levenstein that Farm believed was sexual harassment. The letter included allegations of invading Fann's personal space, staring at her, trying to hold her hand, attempting to hug her, and making inappropriate comments about \"how lucky her boyfriend was.\" Farm sent her letter to Gill following several conversations with Marjorie Stearns, Assistant Director of Student Affairs at Rockford, in which Stearns encouraged Fann to contact Gill. Although unsigned, the letter was not truly \"anonymous\" in that Stearns had spoken to Gill about Fann's complaint prior to Gill's receipt of the letter. 13. On April 27, 1995, Gill sent a copy of Fann's letter to Levenstein, Salafsky and Executive Dean Gerald Moss, Dean of the entire College of Medicine, advising that pursuant to University policy, no investigation would ensue because the letter was \"anonymous.\" Gill also advised Levenstein that in the event the \"anonymous\" complainant or another individual came forward with similar allegations, the allegations would be investigated. Levenstein sent a response to Gill indicating that he had no knowledge or recollection of the behavior alleged by the \"anonymous\" student and was deeply upset by the allegations. 14. In the meantime, throughout the Spring of 1995, Levenstein was undergoing a routine five-year review of his performance as department head. Dr. Uttech, a physician at Rockford *6 who had worked with Levenstein, received an evaluation form for Levenstein's five-year review. Uttech completed the form but felt it was incomplete because it did not include questions relating to appropriate workplace conduct. Uttech approached Dr. Lowell Edwards, her supervisor and a member of Levenstein's five-year review committee, to discuss concerns she had about Levenstein's behavior. Uttech told Lowell that Levenstein had inappropriately touched her and made similarly inappropriate comments directed toward her. Sometime in late April, Salafsky learned that Uttech had reported inappropriate conduct by Levenstein. Uttech was referred to Gill. On May 1, 1995, Uttech telephoned Gill to discuss her concerns but did 6 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 5/31 not identify herself, except to say that she was a faculty member, because she was fearful of future career ramifications. Ultimately, Uttech did identify herself to Gill shortly after returning from maternity leave in September 1995. At that time, Uttech complained that Levenstein had touched her hips and waist while she read patients' schedules, and had grabbed her hand and placed it over her breast area with his fingers on top of hers. Uttech stated that Levenstein had made her extremely uncomfortable and that she adjusted her daily routine to avoid being alone with him. 15. On a different front, on May 4, 1995, Salafsky presented the proposal for the East Side Clinic to Moss, Charles Rice, Moss' assistant dean, and Dieter Hausmann, the Vice Chancellor for Health Services. All present agreed that the East Side Clinic project should proceed. 16. Levenstein made several inquiries in an attempt to determine the identity of the \"anonymous\" letter-writer. Levenstein testified that if he had discovered her identity, he planned to contact her and tell her that she could have spoken to him directly. 17. On May 8, 1995, Moss and Salafsky conferred about Levenstein and agreed that they *7 would give him two options: either resign or be suspended with pay and investigated for \"sexual harassment.\" 7 18. Later that same day, Chmelik approached Salafsky for the second time in an attempt to improve communications between Levenstein and Salafsky. During this meeting, Salafsky told Chmelick that there was a \"sexual harassment charge\" against Levenstein, and that six to eight women were involved. 19. Also on May 8, Linda Kennedy and Tracy Moen Hobart, two of Levenstein's department's support staff overheard Levenstein discussing an anonymous letter he had received containing allegations of sexual harassment. That same day, Kennedy and Hobart met with Rockford personnel officer Maurine Semevolos and complained that they too had been sexually harassed by Levenstein. Their allegations consisted of invading personal space, \"blowing kisses,\" inappropriate touching (running fingers down Kennedy's leg and neck) and verbal sexual innuendos. Semevolos advised Kennedy and Hobart to contact Gill if they wished to 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 6/31 pursue formal sexual harassment complaints. At some time on that same day, Salafsky became aware of Kennedy's and Hobart's complaints. It is not clear whether Salafsky was aware of these complaints prior to his meeting with Chmelik. 20. On May 11, 1995, Levenstein was summoned to a meeting with Salafsky and Dr. Wortmann, Associate Regional Dean. At this meeting, Salafsky advised Levenstein that additional complaints of sexual harassment had been made against him, and that if he did not resign, effective at 5:00 p.m. that day, he would be suspended with pay pending the outcome of an investigation of the sexual harassment complaints. At this time, no formal sexual harassment complaint had been filed, although Salafsky had knowledge that Kennedy and Hobart, who had *8 been referred to Gill on May 8, 1995, had both indicated a desire to pursue formal complaints against Levenstein. Salafsky also had knowledge of the recent complaints by Uttech and the prior complaints by Ms. Cotsones, Ms. Anderson and Ms. Kelsey ( see Sec. I.D., infra). 8 21. On that same day, following his meeting with Salafsky and Wortmann, Levenstein telephoned Gill to inquire about the complaints made against him. Gill informed him that, in the event formal complaints were filed, she would conduct an investigation. She added that if he resigned, no investigation would be pursued. 22. After his meeting with Salafsky and Wortmann, and his telephone call with Gill, Levenstein sought the advice of several other faculty members regarding his situation. Levenstein decided not to resign. 23. Salafsky suspended Levenstein effective at 5:00 p.m. on May 11, 1995, pending the outcome of an investigation of the sexual harassment allegations. 24. The following day, May 12, 1995, Salafsky called a meeting of the faculty in Levenstein's department during which he announced that Levenstein had been suspended pending investigation of sexual harassment complaints. At the meeting, one faculty member, Jan DeBruyne, interrupted the meeting to confirm with Salafsky that she had accurately recorded his statements to the 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 7/31 faculty. Salafsky agreed that she had, DeBruyne's contemporaneous notes were as follows: Basically Dr. Salafsky explained to those convened that Dr. Levenstein had been suspended with pay due to alleged sexual harassment. He stated that the case had gone directly to Pat Gill in Chicago, who handles the affirmative affairs and sexual harassment issues for the University of Illinois. Dr. Salafsky stated that a number of women at different `stations' or levels of employment at [Rockford] had written letters which *9 allege that Dr. Levenstein had committed acts of verbal and/or physical abuse. He indicated that four of such letters were sent to Pat Gill during the past month, which prompted her to action according to university policy. Dr. Salafsky stated that out of those four letters one is known to be anonymous. He further stated that of the final three letters it is not known whether there are accompanying signatures. 9 (alteration added). 25. As of May 12, 1995, Gill had received one letter complaining of sexual harassment \u2014 the one from Brenda Fann. D. History of Informal Sexual Harassment Complaints Against Levenstein 26. Although Gill only had one written complaint against Salafsky, and was aware of three other potential complainants \u2014 Kennedy, Hobart and Uttech \u2014 this was not the first time Levenstein had been the subject of sexual harassment allegations. 27. In late 1990 or early 1991, two administrative staff employees, Rena McLaughlin Cotsones and Kathy Kaufman Anderson, complained of sexually inappropriate behavior by Levenstein to Donna Greene Wagenknecht, then Personnel Director at Rockford. Cotsones testified at trial that Levenstein had made inappropriate flirtatious and sexual comments, and had, on one occasion, run his fingers through her hair, Wagenknecht testified that Anderson had complained to her that Levenstein had stared and \"blown kisses\" at her during meetings, inappropriately brushed against her shoulders, and \"played footsie.\" At trial, Levenstein admitted that he winked 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 8/31 at Anderson and that he touched her foot under a table, and further, that Anderson had confronted him and \"gave him hell.\" He denied all the other allegations. 28. In or about February 1991, Wagenknecht informed Salafsky of the details of Cotsones' and Anderson's complaints. Salafsky and Levenstein spoke about the incidents and Salafsky *10 informally warned Levenstein that he needed to be aware of his actions and comments as they may be perceived by someone else. 10 29. In or about September 1993, Andrea Kelsey, a clerk/typist in Levenstein's department, complained in confidence to Vivian Eggleston, then office manager in Levenstein's department, that Levenstein had made her uncomfortable by his touching, gestures and remarks. On one occasion, she alleged that Levenstein cornered her in a copy room and pressed his body against hers. Kelsey told him to stop. Eggleston reported the conversation to Wagenknecht, who, in turn, notified Salafsky. Levenstein testified that he was never apprised of Kelsey's complaint. Salafsky could not recall whether he had discussed Kelsey's complaint with Levenstein. Salafsky testified, however, that he responded by inviting Gill to give a talk to all department heads and chairs about sexual harassment at one of their regularly scheduled meetings. Levenstein attended the meeting. 30. Despite these incidents, Levenstein's file contained no documentation or warnings regarding sexual harassment or any other inappropriate conduct. E. Post-Suspension Investigation 31. On May 16, 1995, Salafsky sent an e-mail to Moss which stated: Liz Burns also called . . . having called you. Said she was \"shocked\" as she had just seen everyone at the meeting in New Orleans. Anyhow, she kindly volunteered to help and knows some people that are looking think it is a rather attractive position here, and with some luck won't be vacant as long as pediatrics. The \"attractive position\" Salafsky was referring to was Levenstein's position as professor and department head. *11 11 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 9/31 32. Immediately following Levenstein's suspension, Salafsky had appointed Dr. Lowell Edwards to act as interim head of Levenstein's department. Over the next two months, under Edwards' watch, Salafsky would substantially reorganize Levenstein's department. 33. On May 17, 1995, Salafsky spoke with Fann himself, and reported to Moss as follows: Gerry hope you now do talk with the Rockford medical student who has to date not wished to reveal her identity believe she will come forward and sign a formal complaint. Her reluctance stems from her hope of eventually joining the faculty here and the fear that others who defend Dr. Levenstein may be \"unforgiving.\" I've assured her that won't be an issue . . . As of now believe two clerical people and at least one medical student will sign formal complaints next week. There may be more. I'll keep you posted. 34. On May 17, Fann wrote and signed a formal letter of complaint against Dr. Levenstein. 35. Gill then received formal letters of complaint from Kennedy and Mo en, as well as a single, joint \"Request for Action\" form signed by Fann, Kennedy and Moen. The form was dated May 21, 1995. 36. Upon receipt of the letters, Gill began her investigation of the charges brought by Fann, Kennedy and Moen. Gill edited the complaints to include only those allegations which she felt that, if proved, would constitute a violation of University policy. The complaints included allegations of invading personal space; touching their hands as if trying to hold them; repeatedly brushing his hand against Kennedy's rear end; running his finger up and down Kennedy's leg at a meeting; running his finger up and down Kennedy's neck, and when she turned around, saying was going to kiss your neck if you hadn't turned around'; blowing kisses; and various sexual comments. 37. In a letter to Levenstein dated May 24, 1995, Gill notified him of the specifics of the *12 complaints lodged by Fann, Kennedy and Moen. The letter informed Levenstein that the alleged facts, if true, could violate the 12 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 10/31 University's policy prohibiting sexual harassment, therefore must proceed to investigate the claims. The letter stated that the first step of the process allowed Levenstein to respond in writing to the allegations. The letter requested a response within ten days from the date he received the letter. Further, the facts gathered would be submitted to a panel for review. Then, findings or determinations would be made within thirty days of the completion of the investigation and be provided in writing to both parties. At that time, any recommendation, if necessary, would be made to Levenstein's superiors. Gill assured Levenstein that he would be given full opportunity to respond to any allegations raised during the investigation. 38. On June 12, 1995, Levenstein's attorney submitted, on Levenstein's behalf, a letter to Gill in response to the sexual harassment complaints. The letter generally denied any sexually offensive conduct, responded to each allegation specifically, and offered a willingness to speak with and apologize to anyone who has perceived his conduct as inappropriate. 39. Through the course of her investigation, Gill interviewed twenty-one persons from May through July, 1995, including Levenstein. 40. On July 7, 1995, Gill interviewed Levenstein, who was accompanied by counsel. Levenstein represented that his June 12, 1995 written response adequately addressed the specific allegations. Levenstein added that there were political reasons that he was being targeted and that he was not given adequate warning by Salafsky about any specific incident prior to his suspension. 41. On July 23, 1995 Gill completed her investigation and report. Her fourteen-page single-spaced *13 report concluded that Levenstein had violated the University's sexual harassment policy. 13 42. Following consultation with Moss regarding suggestions for corrective action, Gill added the option of \"termination\" to Gill's list of potential corrective measures. Gill submitted the report to her supervisor, Myrna C. Adams, the Associate Chancellor and Director of AAP. 43. Gill then reviewed the results of her investigation and conclusions with Adams. Adams concurred that Levenstein had violated the University's 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 11/31 sexual harassment policy. In fashioning corrective measures, Adams testified that she considered (i) the number of women who were affected by Levenstein's behavior, (ii) the behavior itself which was more than just verbal, (iii) the impact that a person holding a position as a full professor and department head had on the institution, and (iv) the fact that there had been institutional education to clarify the University's sexual harassment policy. 44. On July 28, 1995, Adams submitted to Levenstein the results of the AAP's investigation and recommendations which would be submitted to Deans Moss and Salafsky for remedial action. The letter stated that Adams concurred with the investigator (Gill) that Levenstein was in violation of the University's sexual harassment policy copy of Gill's report was enclosed. Adams' recommendations were: (a) to not permit Levenstein to exercise authority over female subordinates, whether students or employees, for a period of up to three years; because the investigation did not reveal any evidence of misconduct in the classroom or while treating patients, her recommendation of restricted assignment of duties did not extend to \"classroom instruction, lecturing or patient treatment,\" or (b) if the administrators were unable to create an arrangement whereby Levenstein could \"fully perform\" as a member of the faculty consistent with recommendation (a), then termination was appropriate. Adams' letter made no *14 recommendation, one way or the other, regarding Levenstein's on- going suspension. Finally, the letter stated that Levenstein and/or the complainants could appeal the AAP's findings and recommendations to Chancellor Broski within ten days of receipt of the letter. Copies of the letter were sent to Salafsky, Moss, Broski, Fann, Kennedy, Moen and Bruce Kite, a University lawyer. 14 45. Adams testified that during the ten-day appeal period, she expected the administrators to come to a preliminary consensus regarding what corrective action to take with respect to Levenstein. If Levenstein appealed, Adams expected that the administrators would defer their decision pending outcome of the appeal process. F. Levenstein's Appeal 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 12/31 46. On August 9, 1995, Levenstein submitted an appeal of the AAP's investigative findings and recommendations to Broski. 47. Broski sought Gill's recommendations on potential panel members, and assembled a three-person Faculty Appeal Panel (\"FAP\"). 48. The conducted its own investigation, which included a review of the findings, as well as interviews of Fann, Hobart, Kennedy, Levenstein, and several witnesses including those suggested by Levenstein. 49. On August 28, 1995, Salafsky sent an e-mail to Moss stating: Jerry: Spoke to Dieter on two issues. 1. Apparently we may have problems getting rid of Levenstein because the faculty senate will ask why we did not counsel him to gain formal help for his `pathology'! \"Dieter\" is Dieter Hausmann. *15 15 50. On September 22, 1995, and later on October 18, 1995, the requested, and Broski approved, two requests for thirty-day extensions for the to complete their investigation and submit their findings. 51. On October 5, 1995, the Management Committee unanimously approved the East Side Clinic. Later that month, Hausmann made a presentation to the Board of Trustees regarding the clinic. 52. On November 7, 1995, Levenstein and his counsel were given the opportunity to make a final statement and to comment on the various witness statements. 53. On November 20, the issued a seventeen-page single-spaced report which concluded that there was a \"sufficient factual basis\" to support the conclusion that Levenstein had submitted Fann, Kennedy and Moen to \"unwanted sexual gesture, physical contact, and statements that were offensive, humiliating or interfered with required tasks or career opportunities at the University.\" In arriving at its conclusion, the consistently found Levenstein's version of events to be less credible than the complainants. The also expressly rejected Levenstein's allegations 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 13/31 that Gill was biased and predisposed to finding him in violation of the University's sexual harassment policy. 54. The declined to offer any recommendations regarding corrective actions or sanctions, but suggested reconsideration of Adams' recommendations which it characterized as \"contradictory\" and \"not capable of being carried out.\" In conclusion, the noted the following: [B]efore any decision is made regarding corrective action, serious consideration must be given to the mitigating circumstances as well as the aggravating ones. The aggravating factors include the fact *16 that Dr. Levenstein had been previously warned about this behavior, he consistently denies any wrong doing and that there appears to be a pattern of similar conduct involving other personnel over a period of years, but not specifically addressed in these charges. However, there are mitigating factors that the panel feels the administration should consider as well. These factors include witnesses who never saw inappropriate behavior by Dr. Levenstein, the many letters of support received and expressions of confidence in Dr. Levenstein from colleagues, staff and students, and Dr. Levenstein's strong record of achievement and contributions he has made as a faculty member at the College of Medicine in Rockford. 16 55. On December 12, 1995, Salafsky recommended to Moss in writing that procedures be commenced to remove Levenstein from his tenured faculty position pursuant to the University Statutes. In his letter, Salafsky stated that the complaints, the findings of the and the affirmation of those findings by the constituted cause for termination. Salafsky addressed Adams' first alternative recommendation, but rejected it because he thought it impossible to place Levenstein in a teaching, research or clinical position in which he would not have some type of supervisory role over female students, staff or faculty or be in a position of authority which he could abuse. 56. On that same day, Salafsky recommended to Moss, again in writing, that Levenstein be removed as a department head. Salafsky's decision to remove Levenstein was based on both the results of the five-year review of 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 14/31 Levenstein's performance and the sexual harassment findings of the and the FAP. Although Levenstein's tenured faculty position could be terminated only in accordance with University statutes, department heads could be removed upon recommendation of the Dean with the Chancellor's approval. 57. Moss concurred with Salafsky's recommendations and, on December 13, 1995, recommended in writing to Broski both that the University proceed with the removal of *17 Levenstein from the tenured faculty of the University, and that he be removed as department head. Moss based his recommendations on roughly the same factors cited by Salafsky. 17 58. On or about December 14, 1995, Broski received and reviewed the recommendations of Salafsky and Moss regarding Levenstein. Broski reviewed the report and recommendations and the report. Broski also received and reviewed letters of support for Levenstein submitted after his receipt of the report and the recommendations of Salafsky and Moss. 59. On December 21, Broski recommended in writing to President Stukel that Levenstein's tenure be reviewed \"with the intent to revoke\" in accordance with University statutes. Broski testified credibly that prior to making this recommendation, he discussed with Stukel the seriousness of a recommendation of tenure termination. The basis for Broski's recommendation mirrored that of Salafsky and Moss, as well as his observations that Levenstein had maintained throughout the process that he had done nothing wrong, and that termination was the appropriate measure to protect the welfare of the students, faculty and staff at Rockford. 60. Also on December 21, Broski advised Stukel that Levenstein had been placed on paid leave pending conclusion of the investigation and determination of appropriate action. Broski advised Stukel that if he, as President, believed that cause for dismissal may exist and that alleged violations of the University's sexual harassment policy constitute exceptional circumstances, then Stukel must determine his leave status under Article X, Section 1 of the University Statutes. Broski forwarded both the and files to Stukel. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 15/31 61. That same day, Broski informed Levenstein in writing that he was relieved as department head and that he had recommended to Stukel the commencement of dismissal proceedings under the University Statutes. *18 G. Applicable Provisions of the University Statutes 18 62. The University Statutes, Article X, Section 1, \u00b6\u00b6 d e(1)-(9), delineate the proceedings for dismissal of an appointee to the academic staff with indefinite tenure. Paragraph d states that due cause for dismissal exists only if: . . . a faculty member's performance of University duties and functions or extramural conduct is found to demonstrate clearly and convincingly that the faculty member can no longer be relied upon to perform those University duties and functions in a manner consonant with professional standards of competence and responsibility Paragraph e(1) sets forth the procedures the President must follow prior to commencing tenure termination proceedings: (1) Charges. When it shall appear to the president that cause of the dismissal of an appointee may exist, the president shall consult with the Faculty Advisory Committee [(\"FAC\")]. The president, after such consultation, shall determine whether dismissal proceedings should be instituted. Charges looking to dismissal shall be preferred by statement in writing by the president or the president's designee and shall be filed with the clerk or secretary within thirty days after consultation with the [FAC]. The statement shall be sufficiently specific to reasonably inform the appointee of the nature of the charges and enable the appointee to present a defense to them. (alterations added.) Paragraph e also provides that tenure termination procedures shall include a notice of the charges, an evidentiary hearing before the Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure and rights of appeal to the Board of Trustees in the event the president decides to pursue termination. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 16/31 Paragraph e(8) govern's the president's reassignment of an appointee pending consideration of dismissal: *19 19 (8) Reassignment of Duties. Under exceptional circumstances, and when such action is clearly necessary and justified, the president may direct that a faculty member be relieved of some or all of the faculty member's University duties and functions and reassigned to others, without prejudice and without loss of compensation, pending the final decision of the case, subject to the following provisions: (a) the president may reassign duties before the filing of any charges only after giving notice to the chair or, in the absence of the chair from the University to some member of the [FAC], that the president believes that cause for dismissal may exist; (b) if the president reassigns those duties after so giving notice to the chair or some member of the [FAC], such reassignment shall terminate within thirty days after that committee has made its recommendations to the president unless the president initiates dismissal proceedings by the filing of charges for dismissal within that thirty-day period; and (c) if the president initiates dismissal proceedings by filing charges for dismissal, the president may reassign duties or extend a previous reassignment of duties until the termination of those proceedings or until the effective day of dismissal if the proceedings should result in dismissal. (alterations added.) 63. It is undisputed that Levenstein was aware of these provisions of the University Statutes. H. Stukel's Review 64. On January 2, 1996, Levenstein, still under suspension, wrote Stukel regarding Broski's recommendation that Stukel commence a tenure revocation hearing. Levenstein stated in the letter that he was wrongfully accused of sexual harassment, that he was subjected to a sham investigation and appeals process, that virtually all of the incriminating evidence against him had been fabricated by either Gill or Salafsky, that Salafsky in particular was motivated by a political agenda against him, and that he was prepared to 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 17/31 demonstrate all of this in the event that Stukel opted for a dismissal hearing. Levenstein also stated: \"As you may or may not have been *20 advised have proposed reasonable terms under which would be willing to voluntarily leave the University. On two occasions, this offer was summarily rejected by the University's counsel.\" Finally, Levenstein requested that Stukel lift the suspension to allow him to return to work until the matter was resolved. 20 65. In January 1996, Stukel reviewed the materials Broski and Levenstein had provided him and concluded that the charges against Levenstein may warrant dismissal, and that he should proceed with dismissal proceedings. Stukel also determined that Levenstein should remain suspended to maintain a harassment-free environment at Rockford. 66. On January 9, Stukel responded to Levenstein's letter. Stukel advised Levenstein that he had received a recommendation from Broski that dismissal proceedings be commenced against Levenstein, that the process was governed by the University Statutes, and that when he completed his review of the relevant materials he would seek the advice of the FAC. Stukel stated that he would include Levenstein's January 2 correspondence in with the materials he would send to the FAC. Stukel acknowledged that Levenstein had been placed on a leave of absence since May 11, 1995. Stukel indicated that following his consultation with FAC, he would decide whether there was just cause to proceed with the dismissal proceedings. At that time, he also would determine whether his suspension should continue. Stukel urged patience, assured Levenstein that he viewed the matter \"most seriously,\" and advised that \"in the meantime, the status quo will continue.\" 67. On February 7, 1996, Stukel wrote to the Co-Chairs of the indicating that he sought their recommendation regarding whether tenure termination proceedings should be commenced against Levenstein. Stukel forwarded to the draft charges that had been prepared, at *21 Stukel's request, by Broski with the assistance of University counsel. Stukel requested the FAC, as soon as possible following their review, provide him with written advice on two questions: \"(1) If the allegations are true, do they constitute an appropriate basis for termination of Dr. Levenstein? . . . (2) If termination proceedings are commenced, should he exercise his authority under Article X, Section 1.e.(8) of the Statutes and relieve Dr. Levenstein of his faculty 21 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 18/31 duties and responsibilities and reassign him to other duties pending the completion of the hearing?\" 68. Also on February 7, Stukel advised Levenstein and the that he was exercising his authority under Article X, Sec. 1, \u00b6 e(8) of the University Statutes to reassign Dr. Levenstein to other duties without prejudice and without loss of compensation. Stukel delegated the reassignment to Broski, who, in turn, delegated the responsibility to Rice. Rice assigned Levenstein the task of reviewing and evaluating medical videotapes that needed content and accuracy assessment. Both the videotapes and audio visual equipment would be delivered to Levenstein's home. Levenstein's protests of his reassignment and requests to see patients at the Office of Family Practice were summarily denied by Rice. Rice credibly testified that he considered the task appropriate and necessary. Levenstein also testified convincingly that he found the task to be demeaning. On March 28, approximately one month after he received the first batch of tapes, Levenstein submitted to Rice his review of the tapes Review 69. Meanwhile, Levenstein brought four charges of academic misconduct against Salafsky and various other administrators at Rockford. The agreed to review Levenstein's complaints. The advised Stukel that before they would advise him on whether he should commence dismissal proceedings, they would first assess the legitimacy of Levenstein's *22 academic misconduct charges. 22 70. On March 8, 1996, the requested from Stukel more time to deliberate. Stukel granted the request. Levenstein was not informed of the request. 71. On April 15, 1996, the advised Levenstein in writing that they had concluded that his academic misconduct charges were meritless. The did not copy Stukel on their findings. 72. On April 16, the advised Stukel that he should not pursue termination of Levenstein's tenure and recommended a reassignment consistent with Adams' first alternative recommendation, coupled with 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 19/31 efforts at rehabilitation. The FAC, in its report, stated that it perceived \"no room for serious contention\" that \"several\" of the charges against Levenstein appeared valid. Nevertheless, the stated that \"in good conscience, we cannot, even for purposes of giving you advice, simply assume all the charges to be true. . .\" The articulated its strong reservations regarding whether the allegations proved that his \"future performance . . . will be professionally substandard,\" or, put another way, whether the evidence of Levenstein's past conduct \"clearly and convincingly\" predicted that he would be unable to perform his duties. Thus, the \"advise[d] that the standard would not be met on this record . . .\" The was impressed \"that those closest to this investigation,\" referring to the and Adams, in particular, \"believe that the nature of the claims of misconduct against Levenstein may be appropriately addressed through a plan of remediation.\" The following excerpt summarizes the FAC's position: Based upon our reading of the record, as you have sent it to us, it appears to us that, in at least some cases, the evidence already garnered is not particularly persuasive, nor the conduct, if proved necessarily wrongful. For instance, in at least one case a complaining witness under *23 Dr. Levenstein's supervision is alleged to have had significant out-of-the-office voluntary contact with Dr. Levenstein at the very same time of the incidents complained of. We also believe that, in some cases, Dr. Levenstein's actions may be subject to an innocent interpretation, or at worst, may be unintentional. This has not been sufficiently explored 23 * * * It is also true that both Dean Salafsky and the faculty panel, in what we conclude to be rather summary fashion, have indicated that Dr. Adams' recommendations could not be implemented. We cannot credit Dr. Salafsky's contrary statement with great weight in advising you and certainly cannot conclude that his statement would meet the clear and convincing test if subjected to careful scrutiny. The record which we have reviewed indicates that there are managerial disputes between Dr. Salafsky and Dr. Levenstein which may well give rise to bias on his part, leading in turn to an 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 20/31 inference that his conclusions on remediation could be less than objective. This is reflected in what appears to us to be the overly aggressive approach he may have taken in the crucial time frame in early May, 1995, particularly in some of the statements which he has admitted he made to the faculty. The did not copy Levenstein or any administrators on their recommendations to Stukel. 73 Co-Chair Truman Anderson testified that he had reservations about the FAC's proposal, but nonetheless acceded to the majority. He also credibly testified that the FAC, an elected faculty body, had an institutional aversion to tenure termination. 74. The FAC's recommendation was advisory and did not bind Stukel. Pursuant to University Statutes, Article X, Section 1, \u00b6 e(1), Stukel was required to either commence termination proceedings against Levenstein or return Levenstein to active employment as a tenured faculty member within 30 days of his receipt of the FAC's advice. *24 24 J. Levenstein Resigns 75. Before Stukel had made a decision, Levenstein, on April 23, 1996, tendered a resignation letter to Stukel. Because Stukel was out of the office traveling, Stukel's office forwarded Levenstein's resignation to the College of Medicine. Rice acknowledged and accepted Levenstein's resignation in writing. In his letter, Levenstein states that have persevered for 11\u00bd months under the incredible burden of unsupported allegations and public humiliation in the hope that someone would listen to the truth. To be frank, you were my last hope . . . Four and a half months later, you appear to be no closer to bringing this matter to a close . . .\" 76. Stukel did not inform Levenstein that the had submitted their report, nor did the University Statutes require him to do so. At the same time, Levenstein did not inquire as to the status of the FAC's review. 77. Had Levenstein not resigned, and had Stukel chosen to pursue tenure termination proceedings, the University Statutes, Article X, Sec. 1, \u00b6 e(1)- 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 21/31 (8), would have required: (i) a statement of the charges, (ii) an opportunity to file an answer to the charges, (iii) a closed hearing, on at least twenty days notice, before the University's Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure, at which the appointee would be entitled to be present at all sessions when evidence was being received, to be accompanied by an attorney, to question witnesses and, when all the evidence has been received, to make a closing argument in person or by counsel, (iv) the Committee's explicit findings of fact on each charge, conclusions and recommendations, (v) a reasonable opportunity to file a written statement detailing objections to the Committee's findings, conclusions and recommendations, (vi) a hearing before the University's Board of Trustees, unless the Committee recommended that the charges be dropped and the President *25 concurred, and (vii) further review and hearings before the Board of Trustees, with the same or similar rights and opportunities as presented at the Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure level, with the Board making the final decision. 25 78. As with the other provisions of the University Statutes relating to termination of a tenured faculty member, Levenstein was aware of these provisions. 79. Since resigning from the University, Levenstein has been consistently employed in and around the Rockford community practicing medicine. II. Conclusions of Law Levenstein's Amended Complaint alleges two Counts, both brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983. First, Levenstein avers, under a constructive discharge theory, that he was deprived of his property interest in tenured employment without Fourteenth Amendment due process. Second, Levenstein alleges that he was denied Fourteenth Amendment equal protection because University administrators, motivated by subjective ill- will, treated him differently than another similarly situated tenured professor who also was accused of sexual harassment. The Court addresses Levenstein's claims in turn. A. Procedural Due Process 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 22/31 \"Procedural due process claims require a two-step analysis. The first step requires us to determine whether the plaintiff has been deprived of a property interest; the second requires a determination of what process is due.\" Townsend v. Vallas, 256 F.3d 661, 673 (7th Cir. 2001). For ease of analysis, the Court separates the inquiry into three steps: (i) whether Levenstein had a Constitionally-cognizable property interest in his position, (ii) whether Defendants deprived Levenstein of that property interest, and (iii) whether that deprivation was without notice and an *26 opportunity to be heard. Resolution of the first question is clear \u2014 as a tenured faculty member, Levenstein had a property interest in his position. Levenstein v. Salafsky, 164 F.3d 345, 351 (7th Cir. 1998) Predictably, much of this litigation has focused on the third question, whether Levenstein received adequate \"due process\" throughout the investigation of the sexual harassment charges against him. Levenstein argues that the investigation was a sham from the start and hooks his wagon to the caselaw establishing that \"when the procedures used to investigate the charges are a sham through and through, there has not been a constitutionally sufficient opportunity to respond.\" Levenstein, 164 F.3d at 351 (citations omitted). Defendants respond that Levenstein waived his entitlement to due process by resigning and, alternatively, he did receive sufficient due process prior to his resignation. This inquiry, however, presupposes an affirmative answer to our second question \u2014 was Levenstein deprived of a property interest. This antecedent question is the start, and ultimately the end, of our treatment of Levenstein's due process claim. 26 The University did not terminate Levenstein. Moreover, Levenstein does not argue that his suspension alone deprived him of a property right. \"Levenstein is not arguing that the initial act of suspending him with pay violated any constitutional right, and he is wise not to do so.\" 164 F.3d at 351 (citations omitted); see Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541, 544-45 (1985) (\"[I]n those situations where the employer perceives a significant hazard in keeping the employee on the job, it can avoid the problem by suspending with pay.\") Rather, Levenstein contends that he was constructively discharged. An employee is constructively discharged when \"his working conditions were made so miserable that he was forced to quit.\" Parrett v. City of Connersville, 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 23/31 737 F.2d 690, 694 (7th Cir. 1984) (citations *27 omitted). The Court does not evaluate Levenstein's employment status through his eyes, but rather through those of a reasonable person. Townsend, 256 F.3d at 677. 27 Levenstein argues that the 11\u00bd-month suspension, the physical barring from campus, the humiliation resulting from both Salafsky's exaggerated report to his department's faculty on May 12, 1995 and his removal as department head, and finally, his reassignment to review medical videotapes, which he characterized in his resignation letter to Stukel as \"an assignment which [he did] not consider appropriate for even a third year medical student,\" constituted a constructive discharge. The Court disagrees. First, the investigation was anything but unfounded. Although the Court has strong reservations about Salafsky's overzealous pursuit of Levenstein's suspension, Salafsky's conduct, at most, started an inevitable investigation and suspension a week early. Levenstein was suspended on May 11, 1995, but by May 17, Gill had Fann's formal letter of complaint in hand, and by May 21, had received two more letters by Moen and Kennedy containing serious allegations of sexual harassment. Thus, even absent Salafsky's \"shoot first, ask questions later\" approach, Gill, consistent with her statements to Levenstein on both April 27 and May 8, 1995, would have been obliged to investigate the complaints. See Mathura v. Council for Human Servs. Home Care Servs. , 1996 U.S.Dist 4127, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 1996) (\" [D]efendant's legitimate investigation into complaints against him of sexual harassment cannot support a constructive discharge claim.\") Moreover, the Court finds that suspension pending the end of an investigation was warranted. Because this is not a sexual harassment case, the Court will not evaluate all of the nuances of each complainant's allegations. What is important is that the facially-credible *28 allegations against Levenstein \u2014 irrespective of whether they were true, or even if true, whether they constituted a violation of the University's sexual harassment policy \u2014 were sufficiently serious to warrant his suspension. This is particularly true given his substantial supervisory authority over the complainants as both a tenured faculty member and department head. The administrators' concerns understandably were amplified by Levenstein's attempts to discover the identity of the \"anonymous\" letter writer. Thus, 28 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 24/31 even if Salafsky had an ulterior agenda in suspending Levenstein, the Court does not find that Salafsky was the cause, in fact, of the investigation or the suspension; rather, the series of complaints lodged against Levenstein were the cause. Put another way, Salafsky's acceleration of the process does not change the fact that the investigation and suspension were firmly grounded in a legitimate administrative purpose. Second, the suspension, though lengthy, was not, by objective standards, an intolerable burden brief recap of the investigation's timeline is instructive. The complaints were filed, and Levenstein was suspended, in May 1995. Gill's investigation, which was undeniably extensive, concluded in July 1995. Gill submitted her detailed findings in August 1995. The AAP's recommendations to the University administrators were completed that same month. Levenstein opted to appeal the AAP's findings. The FAP's review of Levenstein's file (including the complaints and the findings and recommendations), coupled with its own independent investigation, concluded in November, 1995. Salafsky, Moss and Broski reviewed the and findings, and finalized their recommendations in December, In January 1996, Stukel reviewed the Levenstein file accumulated to date (including the complaints, the findings and recommendations, the findings, and the administrators' recommendations), and determined that the process should continue. Stukel requested and received draft termination *29 charges from Broski on February 1. On February 7, Stukel, consistent with the University Statutes, sought the advice of the regarding Levenstein's dismissal. The FAC's delay in deliberating was due, in part, to their consideration of Levenstein's academic misconduct charges brought against Salafsky and other Rockford administrators. On April 15, the found Levenstein's academic misconduct charges to be meritless. The following day, on April 16, the advised Stukel that they opposed proceeding with termination proceedings. The University Statutes required Stukel to decide whether to seek Levenstein's termination within thirty days of receipt of the FAC's advice, by May 16. On April 23, Levenstein resigned. Had Stukel decided to go forward with Levenstein's termination, further rounds of hearings and appeals were available to Levenstein. 29 In Loudermill, the Supreme Court noted that \"[a]t some point, a delay in the termination process could become a constitutional violation.\" 470 U.S. at 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 25/31 470 U.S. at 547; see also Tonkovich v. Kansas Bd. of Regents, 159 F.3d 504, 524 (10th Cir. *30 1998) (tenure termination proceedings which lasted over three years did not violate due process). Here, too, the Court finds that the administrative process, in which Levenstein was an active participant, was not unreasonably drawn out. The process was indeed lengthy. However, its length was not attributable to intentional foot-dragging, but rather to the multi-tiered nature of the review process, and, as in Loudermill, to the thoroughness with which each step was taken. 547. Although Loudermill addressed termination process delays in analyzing whether due process had been granted, and not the present inquiry of whether a property right had been taken, the two inquiries are not hermetically distinct. In Loudermill, the Court, in rejecting the petitioner's claim that he was denied due process after a nine-month termination proceeding, reasoned as follows: [T]he complaint merely recites the course of proceedings and concludes that the denial of a \"speedy\" resolution violated due process. This reveals nothing about the delay except that it stemmed in part from the thoroughness of the procedures. . . . The chronology of the proceedings set out in the complaint, coupled with the assertion that nine months is too long to wait, does not state a claim of a constitutional deprivation. 30 Third, and significantly, the suspension was temporary. Although the suspension may have, at times, felt endless to Levenstein, he was fully aware that his circumstances were not permanent. At any point on the procedural timeline between May 1995 and April 1996, Levenstein knew exactly which procedural step he was at, and further, which steps remained. Additionally, Levenstein's subjective belief that his suspension may not have ended favorably, though a reasonable notion, does not change the fact that his situation was, indeed, temporary. As Levenstein stated in his January 2 to Stukel, \"Whichever way you go. . . .\" This reality dispositively distinguishes Parrett, the case on which Levenstein substantially relies. In Parrett, the plaintiff had been chief of detectives in Connersville, Indiana for many years, until he was reassigned indefinitely to 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 26/31 \"line captain.\" 737 F.2d at 693. However, he was informed that he would be assigned no duties in that capacity. He was relegated to a windowless room, formerly a storage closet, with only a desk and chair, and no telephone. Id. The plaintiff spent his shift sitting in the room literally doing nothing. Id. The Seventh Circuit found that the record revealed \"no reason . . . why he was removed from his office as chief of detectives . . . other than [a supervisor's] animosity toward him stemming from a personal incident. . . .\" Id. Unlike the plaintiff in Parrett., whose reassignment was indefinite, Levenstein was in the *31 midst of an administrative process in which, until his resignation, he and his counsel had actively participated, and that, irrespective of Levenstein's distaste for the results, was moving along. See also Townsend, 256 F.3d at 678 (distinguishing Parrett, and declining to find constructive discharge because, inter alia, the plaintiff \"was aware that he did not face the prospect of an indefinite or permanent reassignment to a job that provided little professional responsibility\"). In addition, while the Parrett Court found \"no reason\" for the reassignment, here, the University had every reason to suspend Levenstein with pay pending exhaustion of the administrative process. 31 Finally, although consideration of the alleged bias of the University's investigative process fits more neatly under the due process inquiry, it also bears on the deprivation analysis, particularly in the constructive discharge context. Again, the Court is suspicious of Salafsky's motives in pushing for Levenstein's suspension and removal. Yet, his conduct does not irremediably taint the University's entire investigatory process. First, the allegations against Levenstein were numerous, credible and serious. Second, the evidence proffered contains no suggestion that it was the way the fact- finding was conducted, as opposed to Levenstein's own conduct, that generated the complaints. Third, Salafsky did not conduct the investigation, nor did he have the final word on the matter. See Schacht v. Wisc. Dept, of Corrections, 175 F.3d 497, 503 (7th Cir. 1999) (claims of bias fail where there was no evidence that the ultimate decisionmaker would have been biased); McDaniels v. Flick, 59 F.3d 446, 459-60 (3d Cir. 1995) (bias at earlier stages of the process is irrelevant so long as decisionmaker at a later stage is impartial). Finally, a global view of Levenstein's matter as it percolated 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 27/31 through the process \u2014 from Gill's findings of sexual harassment in violation of University policy, to Adams' *32 recommendations including retention, to the FAP's measured advisory comments regarding corrective action, to the administrators' recommendations of termination, to the FAC's advice to Stukel rejecting termination \u2014 yields that any suggestion of bias might naturally yield a response of \"against whom?\" 32 Levenstein faced a tough choice between holding out to see where the process would lead or resigning. Indeed, the very fact that this was a tough choice augurs against a finding that Levenstein was compelled to do anything \u2014 a tough choice, yes, but still a choice. The Court thus declines to hold that Levenstein's exercise of his option to resign in the face of credible sexual harassment charges rather than face further proceedings constitutes a constructive discharge claim. See Lighten v. Univ. of Utah, 209 F.3d 1213, 1222 (10th Cir. 2000) (rejecting constructive discharge due process claim of state university professor accused of sexual harassment and given choice of resigning or facing potential disciplinary proceedings.) Because Levenstein was not constructively discharged, the university did not deprive him of a property right, and because Levenstein was not so deprived, he cannot sustain a due process claim. B. Equal Protection To prevail on a selective prosecution equal protection claim, a plaintiff must prove (i) that he was intentionally treated differently than other similarly situated persons, and (ii) that no rational basis existed for the different treatment. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564-65 (2000). Also, there is Seventh Circuit precedent to the effect that for \"class of one\" equal protection claims, like Levenstein's, the \"no rational basis\" prong requires a heightened showing that the defendant \"deliberately sought to deprive him of the equal protection of the laws for reasons of a personal nature unrelated to the duties of the defendant's position.\" Hilton *33 v. City of Wheeling, 209 F.3d 1005, 1008 (7th Cir. 2000); see also Purze v. Village of Winthrop Harbor, 286 F.3d 452, 455 (7th Cir. 2002). More recent Seventh Circuit authority suggests, however, that a \"class of one\" plaintiff still has the option of couching his claim in traditional equal protection terms. See Nevel v. Village of Schaumburg, 297 F.3d 673, 681 (7th Cir. 2002) (a \"class of 33 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 28/31 one\" equal protection plaintiff \"must show that they were (1) intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment or (2) that the government is treating unequally those individuals who are prima facie identical in all relevant respects, and that the cause of the differential treatment is a totally illegitimate animus toward the plaintiff by the defendant.\"(emphasis added; internal quotations omitted) ( citing Albiero v. City of Kankakee, 246 F.3d 927, 932 (7th Cir. 2001)). In this case, the Court need not decide whether Levenstein must meet Hilton's \"gloss[ed]\" rational basis standard, because he fails to make the fundamental showing, under any equal protection standard, that he was treated differently than another similarly situated person. Levenstein attempts to side-step this requirement. In setting up his claim, Levenstein frames the law as follows: \"To prevail on his `class of one' equal protection claim, Levenstein must prove that the `action taken by the state, whether in the form of prosecution or otherwise, was a spiteful effort to `get' him for reasons wholly unrelated to any legitimate state objective.\" (PI. Post-Trial Br., p. 1.) (citation omitted). That's it. This, of course, only touches on what the Court does not reach here \u2014 whether Levenstein must prove, in addition to traditional equal protection requirements, that differential treatment was motivated by subjective ill will. See Purze, 286 F.3d at 455. Levenstein's omission is telling. \"To meet his burden that another employee is `similarly situated,' a plaintiff must *34 demonstrate that there is someone who is directly comparable to him in all material respects.\" Grayson v. O'Neill, 308 F.3d 808, 817-18 (7th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted) \"[I]n disciplinary cases \u2014 in which a plaintiff claims that he was disciplined by his employer more harshly than a similarly situated employee based on some prohibited reason \u2014 a plaintiff must show that he is similarly situated with respect to performance, qualifications and conduct. . . . This normally entails a showing that the two employees dealt with the same supervisor, were subject to the same standards, and had engaged in similar conduct without such differentiating or mitigating circumstances as would distinguish their conduct or the employer's treatment of them.\" Radue v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 219 F.3d 612, 617-18 (7th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). 34 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 29/31 Levenstein points to one employee whom he alleges was similarly situated, but treated differently. Specifically, a tenured professor (the \"professor\") who had allegedly touched a student's breasts \"countless times,\" hugged her, kissed her and repeatedly told her to \"turn around so he could see her butt,\" was not suspended or banned from campus. Levenstein's comparison is vulnerable on several fronts. First, unlike the complaints against Levenstein, the allegations against the professor were limited to one student, not three. Nor did the professor have a history of past informal complaints. Thus, any argument that the professor's conduct was qualitatively more serious is tempered by a quantitative comparison which cuts the other way, Second, the professor was not a supervisor \u2014 this is both factually and legally significant. As a factual matter, this means that, unlike Levenstein, the professor did not have supervisory control over the complaining student. More fundamentally, the University could be held strictly liable for sexual harassment by its supervisors such as Levenstein, but not for similar conduct by a non-supervising professor. See Burlington Indus, v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 759 (1998). *35 35 Further, the evidence demonstrates that the did begin to investigate the allegations against the professor, but the complaining student indicated that she was resolving the matter with the professor and his department head, i.e., she did not wish to pursue a formal complaint settlement agreement was reached, which included several preventive measures. The agreement was reviewed and accepted by and University counsel. Thus, any differences between the University's treatment of Levenstein and the professor are easily reconciled by their materially different positions within the University and the dissimilar circumstances attendant to the sexual harassment allegations. Levenstein offers no other similarly situated individual. Accordingly, his equal protection claim must fail. III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Levenstein. The Clerk is directed to enter a Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 Judgment terminating this case. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 30/31 About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:02 Levenstein v. Salafsky, NO. 95 5524, No. 97 3430, (Consolidated) | Casetext Search + Citator 31/31"} |
7,667 | Diane Leite | University of California – Berkeley | [
"7667_101.pdf",
"7667_102.pdf",
"7667_103.pdf",
"7667_104.pdf"
] | {"7667_101.pdf": "End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite Started 13 March 2012 Petition to Mark G. Yudof (University of California, Office of the President) and 3 others Confirmed victory This petition made change with 482 supporters! Share this petition Why this petition matters Started by Daniel Ho Petition details Comments 2/22/25, 10:03 Petition \u00b7 End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite - United States \u00b7 Change.org 1/4 & SHARE! - Power In Numbers, 400+ & Growing As a tuition/fee paying student, it irks me to think about corruption within university administration. And alas, the headline appeared to me this past week when (now former Berkeley Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research Diane Leite was only demoted in rank and pay despite giving several undeserved raises to purchasing manager Jonathan Caniezo, whom she was having undisclosed sexual relations with. Between 2007 and 2010, Caniezo saw his annual salary increase from $70,000 to $110,000. Vice Chancellor for Research, Graham Fleming was the one who notified Leite of her demotion and pay dock in a letter written on February 17th of last month. Despite being stripped of her title, Leite still receives $175,000 salary compared to the $188,531 prior to the discovery of the affair. Shouldn't she be fired think so. It doesn't matter what college or university you go to, this type of behavior is absolutely intolerable under any circumstances. Such an ethics violation should not be overlooked by students. Let our voices be heard that we will not tolerate such corruption in educational institution administration. This slap on the wrist is a disgrace not only to the faculty and staff of the system but to hard working students all across California. How can our culture value education in a society in which those in control are irresponsible and not doing their job properly? Students of California, let your voice be heard and make Diane Leite resign! Put a stop to corruption and show that we are a force to reckon with. If you care about how your money and taxes are spent, sign this petition. We want Graham Fleming to take stricter action in having Diane Leite and Jonathan Caniezo both not demoted but fired from their positions within Berkeley and the whole University of California system. Letter from Berkeley Vice Chancellor Graham Fleming Graham-Fleming Sources employee-during-sexual?source=most_viewed raise-scandal_n_1339955.html Share this petition 2/22/25, 10:03 Petition \u00b7 End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite - United States \u00b7 Change.org 2/4 improper-raises Update - 3/15/12 We're making progress! San Jose Mercury News has published an article, mentioning this petition! \"In addition to the letter from faculty members, about 150 people by Thursday afternoon had signed an online petition calling for Leite and her boyfriend, Jonathan Caniezo, to be fired.\" Share this petition in person or use the code for your own material. Download Code Report a policy violation Decision-Makers Mark G. Yudof University of California, Office of the President Diane Leite Berkeley Senior Administrator Graham Fleming Vice Chancellor for Research Jonathan Caniezo Procurement & General Services Manager 2/22/25, 10:03 Petition \u00b7 End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite - United States \u00b7 Change.org 3/4 Change.org Education End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite Company About Impact Careers Team Community Blog Community Guidelines Support Help Guides Privacy Terms Cookie Policy Manage Cookies Connect Facebook English (United Kingdom) \u00a9 2025, Change.org This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:03 Petition \u00b7 End Corrupt Berkeley Official Diane Leite - United States \u00b7 Change.org 4/4", "7667_102.pdf": "Berkeley Law Dean Settles Over Sexual Harrassment Allegations Chelsea Viola National Beat Reporter After a series of legal disputes, a settlement has been reached between the University of California, Berkeley, previous Berkeley law school dean, Sujit Choudhry, and his former assistant Tyann Sorrell, who accused Choudhry of sexually assaulting her. The legal settlement resulted in a series of financial remediation; Choudry will give $50,000 to a charity of Sorrell\u2019s choice and pay another $50,000 to her lawyers, according to the terms of the settlement. According to the terms of the settlement, the university will withdraw all the disciplinary complaints against Choudry and will officially consider him to be on a two-year sabbatical until May 2018, when he will officially resign. In the meantime, Choudry will keep his benefits as a tenured professor, such as travel expenses and research funding. Chelsea Viola - April 18, 2017 Image courtesy of Wikimedia The Bottom Line 2/22/25, 10:03 Berkeley Law Dean Settles Over Sexual Harrassment Allegations - The Bottom Line 1/3 This controversial legal battle began in March 2016, when Sorrell filed a lawsuit against her previous boss, claiming that he hugged, kissed, and touched her repeatedly in 2014 and 2015 without her consent and that the officials did nothing to stop it. Two days after filing this lawsuit, Choudhry resigned from his post as dean. It was predetermined in July 2015 that Choudhry had violated the UC\u2019s sexual harassment policy. The punishment issued by Berkeley officials was a temporarily reduced pay by 10 percent, from $415,000 to $375,5000, to apologize to Sorrell, and to seek counseling Berkeley students angrily rallied against this punishment, criticizing Choudhry\u2019s punishment to coincide with the school\u2019s record of tolerating offensive behavior. In response to the student outcry and the public\u2019s intensified magnifying glass on Berkeley President Janet Napolitano wrote to the then-campus Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, demanding that Choudry be barred from campus for the remainder of the academic term and that the Berkeley Academic Senate to consider the revocation of his tenure. The Board of Regents, who are the final say when it comes to revoking tenure, have exercised that power on two Berkeley professors in the past 25 years. Controversy around this case was further inflamed in September 2016, when Choudhry filed a lawsuit against the Berkeley, accusing the Academic Senate for operating on a bias against him, pointing out that after Sorrell filed a suit against Choudhry she received an award from the Senate for outstanding service. Choudhry also claimed that he was being singled out by his race and country of origin. As a Canadian citizen of Indian descent, his lawsuit claims that his treatment was more severe in comparison to two other Berkeley employees, both white, accused of sexual harassment allegations. The first Cal faculty member mentioned was Graham Fleming, who was accused by ex-Assistant Vice Chancellor Diane Leite of sexually assaulting her. In 2016, Fleming stepped down from his post for \u201cpersonal reasons,\u201d but was able to maintain his position as a chemistry professor. But, like Choudhry, Fleming was given no classes to teach. When Geoffrey Marcy, a well-known astronomy professor and potential Nobel Prize contender in 2015, was caught under scrutiny after his record of sexually assaulting his students for over a decade was revealed to the public. The outraged scientific community rallied for Marcy to quit, which he did so later that year, losing his tenure as a professor. According to this new legal settlement, Choudhry dropped his lawsuit against the UC. \u201cAll related litigation has now been dismissed,\u201d the university said in a statement. The Title & Sexual Harassment Prevention Office was contacted for a comment on the issue of Sorrel\u2019s accusations against Choudhry allegations and eventual legal settlement between them, but were unavailable for comment. Chelsea Viola Chelsea Viola is a second year Political Science & History of Public Policy double major, and is the 2016-2017 National Beat reporter for The Bottom Line. She is proudly from the Bay Area (Go Warriors!). In her spare time, Chelsea enjoys 2/22/25, 10:03 Berkeley Law Dean Settles Over Sexual Harrassment Allegations - The Bottom Line 2/3 admiring dogs from a far, watching tv shows that induce existential crises (like Twilight Zone & Black Mirror and all of Food Network), and attending concerts. 2/22/25, 10:03 Berkeley Law Dean Settles Over Sexual Harrassment Allegations - The Bottom Line 3/3", "7667_103.pdf": "Former campus administrator involved in scandal fired By Christopher Yee May 5, 2012 Berkeley terminated the employment today of the former campus administrator who used her position to increase the salary of an employee with whom she had a sexual relationship. Diane Leite had been assistant vice chancellor for Research Enterprise Services but was demoted Feb. 17 for violating the university\u2019s policy on sexual harassment by increasing the salary of Jonathan Caniezo, procurement and general services manager for research services. Caniezo\u2019s salary rose from $78,779 in 2009 to $104,339.60 in 2010, according to a state employee salary database on The Sacramento Bee\u2019s website. The university\u2019s sexual harassment policy deems consensual romantic relationships within the community as inappropriate when one individual has \u201cpower or authority\u201d over the other and calls for the individual in authority to eliminate any conflict of interest. According to campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof, as per campus policy, Leite received up to 60 days of notice or equivalent pay and will not receive any severance. Mogulof said he could not give specifics about the grounds for Leite\u2019s firing because it is a personnel issue. However, Mogulof said the campus will not seek any litigation against Leite. \u201cFrom our perspective, this is the final step,\u201d he said. As of Sunday afternoon, Leite could not be reached for comment. In March, 13 faculty members wrote a letter to Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost George Breslauer questioning the \u201csurprisingly mild measures\u201d administrators took in response to discovering Leite\u2019s actions. Leite\u2019s pay was cut from $188,531 to $175,000, according to the letter sent Feb. 17 from Vice Chancellor for Research Graham Fleming to Leite informing her of her demotion. 2/22/25, 10:03 Former campus administrator involved in scandal fired | Archives | dailycal.org 1/1", "7667_104.pdf": "By Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross, Chronicle Columnists May 6, 2012 Berkeley adviser fired after affair former Berkeley assistant vice chancellor who doubled the salary of a male subordinate during a 15-month affair has been fired from the university. Watch More Newsletters Sign in 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 1/9 Diane Leite, 47, who had already been bumped from her assistant vice chancellor's job, was dismissed from the six-figure-salary adviser's job where she had landed Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof confirmed Friday. Leite's relationship with purchasing manager Jonathan Caniezo, who is 17 years her junior, was detailed in a whistle-blower letter to her boss back in August. Records show that Caniezo's pay grew from $57,864 in late 2008 to $120,000 in 2010 Article continues below this ad When the scandal went public in March, the university came under sharp attack, both on campus and in the state capital, for its decision not to fire the administrator. An investigation concluded that Leite, who oversaw Caniezo's campus research department, had broken the school's sexual harassment policies. She was subsequently reassigned from her $188,000-a-year job as head of the research office to an adviser's role that paid $175,000. Amid the subsequent public furor, sources familiar with the case tell us, Leite was asked to resign. Instead, she hired attorney and Oakland City Councilwoman Jane 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 2/9 Brunner to fight her case. Her dismissal was recently upheld at an internal hearing. \"Everything was done by the book,\" said Mogulof, declining further to comment further. Brunner did not return our calls. With 30 years at the university, Leite is vested and will keep her pension, though she may fall short of the benchmark for receiving health benefits for life. Incidentally, from what we hear, Caniezo is also facing serious disciplinary action from the university - with a big rollback of his salary. Rally time: The home crowd is definitely turning up the heat on Oakland A's owners Lew Wolff and John Fisher to keep the team in town - or sell to someone who will Article continues below this ad 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 3/9 There are deep-pocketed investors who are interested. None is willing to be publicly identified just yet, but we're told one group is based in Oakland, one in the South Bay and the third is from Southern California. While possible suitors stay in the shadows, the Save the A's boosters trotted out one of the biggest guns in their arsenal Thursday - Clorox Don Knauss, who is leading a pack of local businesses fighting to keep the team in town. As former chief executive of Minute Maid, Knauss helped with the effort to build the Houston Astros' downtown ballpark that subsequently bore the company's name. Knauss said he hasn't had any conversations with Wolff, but that his group's \"first preference\" is to work with the team's ownership if they're willing to \"recommit to Oakland Article continues below this ad 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 4/9 If not, he said, \"we are confident we've identified people who have the financial wherewithal to buy the team ... and to get a new stadium built.\" Wolff, however, tells us that \"nobody has contacted me about buying the team,\" and anyway, \"we have no interest in selling it - we have an interest in getting a new ballpark.\" Just not in Oakland. Bank shot: It had all the makings of a great press moment - crusading state Attorney General Kamala Harris, all dressed up for the cameras and ready to testify for bills implementing housing-loan reforms she just won in a big federal settlement Article continues below this ad But Harris had barely begun to speak when Assemblyman Mike Eng, chairman of the Assembly Banking Committee, informed her that it really wasn't necessary because he was pulling the bills. The unstated reason: They didn't have the votes. \"Welcome to Sacramento? To be honest, it didn't come as a surprise,\" Harris said. 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 5/9 Instead, the bills were sent behind closed doors to an Assembly-Senate conference committee, where legislative leaders John P\u00e9rez and Darrell Steinberg hope to bypass bank-friendly Republicans and moderate Democrats who have killed similar bills in the past. \"It was a chess move,\" Harris said. \"It's not necessarily going to win the game, but it will keep the fight alive Article continues below this ad The bills would end such practices as \"dual tracking,\" where homeowners get foreclosed on even if they have worked out a restructuring plan. \"We'll be fighting for the strongest consumer protections possible, well aware of the power of the banking lobby,\" said state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco. And he should know - the banking lobby has defeated Leno's two previous dual- tracking bills Article continues below this ad 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 6/9 May 6, 2012 Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross EXTRA! Catch our blog at San Francisco Chronicle columnists Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross appear Sundays, Mondays and Wednesdays. Matier can be seen on the morning and evening news. He can also be heard on radio Monday through Friday at 7:50 a.m. and 5:50 p.m. Got a tip? Call (415) 777-8815, or e-mail [email protected]. Around The Web Powered by Find Useful Knowledge By Ethereal Search Engine The Close Relationship Between Stress and Sleep By How Long Should Keep My Car? By 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 7/9 Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online By The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy By Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness By Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com By Why Google Workspace for Business is Worth the Upgrade By The New Normal of Selling a Home Today By Let's Play Typeshift Really Bad Chess Flipart Cross|word About Contact Services Top 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 8/9 Quick Links \u00a9 2025 Hearst Communications, Inc. Terms of Use Privacy Notice Notice at Collection Your Privacy Rights (Shine the Light Industry Opt Out Your Privacy Choices (Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads) 2/22/25, 10:04 Berkeley adviser fired after affair 9/9"} |
8,756 | Keith Clark | Western Kentucky University – Bowling Green | [
"8756_101.pdf"
] | {"8756_101.pdf": "\uf060 \uf044 \uf02f \uf1c1 WKUHerald.com \u2022 September 20, 2021 \u2022 sexual-misconduct-files-obscure-nearly-a-decade-of-university-title-ix-actions/ Blacked out: Redacted sexual misconduct files obscure nearly a decade of university Title actions Lily Burris and Debra Murray After a four-year legal battle and a Supreme Court decision in a similar case released nearly a decade\u2019s worth of sexual misconduct records this summer in response to a Herald open records request filed in 2016 and another earlier this year. Files from both responses, a total of 39 investigations, were released but heavily redacted. In 27 cases, covering allegations of sexual misconduct lodged against faculty or other employees from 2011 through 2020, the university concluded that the incidents did not violate WKU\u2019s Title policy. Those claims involved both students and employees and ranged from possible homophobic job denial to what the person felt was excessive touching found, in nine cases, enough evidence that resulted in the resignation or retirement of faculty or staff members, effectively ending the investigation before a formal conclusion. This included a case of a male staff member threatening to place holds on a female student\u2019s TopNet account, blocking her from registering for classes, in exchange for going on dates. In three cases, enough evidence was found to fire or discontinue the employees. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 Michael Abate, the Herald\u2019s attorney at the Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird law firm in Louisville, contends that the records released were \u201cseriously over-redacted.\u201d Abate said the Herald is in the process of disputing those redactions and may ask the courts to resolve the dispute. In the original Nov. 1, 2016, open records request, the Herald asked for all investigative records for all Title investigations into all sexual misconduct allegations against employees in the last five years. This request was mirrored in spring 2021 when began to fulfill the original request initially rejected the 2016 request by citing the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. The Herald appealed the decision to Kentucky\u2019s attorney general, who oversees public access laws. The then Attorney General, now Governor Andy Beshear ruled was in violation of the Kentucky Open Records Act and ordered to turn over the documents. Instead sued the Herald in Warren County Circuit Court in February 2017 in a case that still has not been resolved 4 1\u20442 years later. In a similar case where the University of Kentucky refused to turn over sexual misconduct records to the Kentucky Kernel, the university student newspaper, the state Supreme Court in March ruled in favor of the publication. The court opinion said could not use as an \u201cinvisibility cloak\u201d to hide all documents involved or associated with students. The federal law does indicate should be used to protect students\u2019 educational records. Abate said \u201ca requester is entitled to everything in the file not specifically exempt\u201d and cannot use to redact information about employees. The university is required to provide an index of reasons for their redactions. While did provide an index, Abate disputes whether many of the redactions were permissible under the Open Records Act. After the decision decided to begin turning over the 2011- 2016 records to the Herald, releasing redacted records over the next few months. In turn, the Herald made an identical request for records of such cases from 2016-2021. With the redactions, Abate said things appear to be missing from the files. The biggest one is the names of faculty and staff accused of wrong- doing, even if the claim is not found to be a violation of university policy. Abate said there is controlling case law that entitles the public to the names and handlings of the accusations. \u201cIn many instances, the university also redacted key substantive details of the allegations that make it difficult to know what actually happened,\u201d Abate said. \u201cSeveral files appear to be missing documentation contained in almost all other files. And in some places the redactions are not clearly explained, so it\u2019s impossible to know exactly what has been withheld.\u201d In a document outlining its reasons for redactions said it was following the ruling of the Supreme Court, federal privacy regulations and, on cases where no violations were found, a 2020 attorney general\u2019s opinion. For the public to have confidence in the safety of the campus community, Abate said, they must know these allegations are being handled seriously and appropriately. \u201cPublic universities simply cannot be permitted to sweep serious allegations under the rug or quietly push policy violators out the door to other institutions where they might offend again,\u201d Abate said. \u201cUnfortunately, the facts that have come to light from the Herald\u2019s reporting show that pattern of behavior is all too common among universities.\u201d Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 \u2018In the dark\u2019 Title policy On May 4, 2017, the Herald published \u201cIn the Dark,\u201d an in-depth report in which former Herald staffer Nicole Ares reported on more than 1,200 pages of records obtained through public records requests to all eight public Kentucky universities. Six of the eight universities provided records at the time, with only and Kentucky State University denying the request. Ares\u2019 story detailed violations at Northern Kentucky University, Eastern Kentucky University and Murray State University. At the time Andrea Anderson, who was then Title coordinator and now WKU\u2019s general counsel, told Ares that had six investigations that resulted in violations of the university\u2019s misconduct policy. Deborah Wilkins, WKU\u2019s Title coordinator who at the time of the Herald\u2019s 2016 request was general counsel, said Title discrimination includes sexual harassment and assault, domestic violence and stalking. Wilkins said this policy is not a complaint process, but is more of a services process. When WKU\u2019s Title office talks about an investigation, Wilkins said, investigators try to use neutral language. The person who filed the report is referred to as the complainant. The person accused in the report is called the respondent. \u201cWhen we get a report, the first thing we do, whether it\u2019s an employee or a student, is [ask] what can we do to assist this person?\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cWhat services can we do to help them get on track? Get comfortable? Respond to their needs?\u201d These services are about bringing back the sense of safety and security the complainant had before, Wilkins said. This might include changing a student\u2019s residence hall, prohibiting someone from entering a residence hall or getting the student from a class. The majority of reports the Title office receives come from a student about another student. These reports then involve employees in the Office of Student Conduct such as Michael Crowe, director, or Melanie Evans, coordinator. Other reports to the Title office involve employees, like the ones the Herald requested. The cases are handled by the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action/University Services, where Joshua Hayes is director, Title deputy/investigator and university coordinator. Hayes declined to be interviewed. After a complainant files a report and immediate services have been administered, Wilkins said, she is obligated under law to ask the person if they want to file a complaint and have their case formally investigated. Wilkins said they treat each report like it\u2019s going to be a complaint, but it\u2019s not their top priority. \u201cMy priority is to help them first,\u201d Wilkins said. Once a report is made to the Title office against an employee, Wilkins reaches out to the complainant to speak with them about the issue. Whether or not the complainant responds, Wilkins and Hayes begin an investigation into the complaint if it\u2019s about an employee, a new step as of August 2020. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 Title changes When Wilkins speaks with a complainant, she asks them if there were any witnesses they want the office to reach out to, which they will have the opportunity to add later. The complainant will be asked if they want an adviser to help them through the process. After the complainant has spoken with the Title office, Wilkins will offer them a copy of the transcript of their conversation to review and edit before officially adding it to the file. Simultaneously, Wilkins and Hayes then reach out to the director of the area of the university where the respondent worked, assuming the complaint is not against the director, and inform them that a complaint has been filed against one of their employees. They ask the director to make sure the parties are not in close contact or sharing responsibilities. Next, they interview the respond- ent against whom the report was filed to hear their version of events. They too are offered an adviser and asked for their list of witnesses. The respondent may say the opposite of what the student says and they are also allowed to review their statement. If there are videos, messages or emails that can be provided as evidence to the case, Wilkins said she and Hayes would also review those as a part of this process. Hayes and Wilkins then start talking to witnesses and having them review their statements for the investigation. This can take varying lengths of time, depending on the size of the department, how many witnesses there are and how fast they respond. Once the file is completed, it is shared with the complainant and respondent. They may have nothing to add to it. \u201cThen Josh and will determine, do we think there\u2019s a likelihood the policy has been violated?\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cIs there enough here to have a hearing?\u201d Another change since August 2020 is that if there is an employee involved in a complaint, there will be a hearing with an outside officer from the state Council on Postsecondary Education unless the allegation turns out to be entirely without foundation. Wilkins said an example would be if there was an allegation of an incident that happened on campus and the accused employee was proven to be in California at the time. During this process, an employee respondent can decide to resign or retire. If they do, then the investigation stops and that will be noted in the record. Wilkins said this stops with retirement or resignation because the university essentially loses jurisdiction. If the hearing officer decides the respondent has violated Title policy, the office issues a notice. Then the respondent\u2019s department head and the vice president of the division where the respondent works have 10 days to decide how they\u2019re going to address it and inform WKU\u2019s Title office, another new step as of August 2020 requires any employee who hears of sexual misconduct to report it to the Title office, even if it doesn\u2019t involve them or their work, but does not expect the person making such a report to verify that the incident actually occurred. \u201cBasically, what I\u2019m hammering on them is you don\u2019t have to investigate, you don\u2019t have to determine if it\u2019s true,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cJust call us and we\u2019ll determine if it\u2019s true and you can go on your way.\u201d On Aug. 14, 2020, new federal Title regulations took effect. \u201cIn my mind, the biggest change was the fact that if it involves an employee, there is a hearing,\u201d Wilkins said. This means that with every Title report that comes in involving an employee, the office has to do a full investigation. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 \u201cIf there\u2019s evidence to show that it\u2019s more likely than not that a violation occurred, we will have a hearing,\u201d Wilkins said. Reports that only involve students can end or be resolved without a hearing. For each report involving an employee, the hearing officer for the case is a neutral person from the state Council on Postsecondary Education. This hearing officer will hear from the complainant, respondent, any witness and the investigators before deciding if the policy or policies in question were violated. Before August 2020, those matters were handled within the university. After the hearing officer makes a decision, the complainant or the respondent can appeal it and then a new hearing officer will make a new decision. However, no one else can appeal the decision. The respondent\u2019s supervisor is not allowed to disagree and ignore it. Wilkins said has not, as of yet, had an occasion that would need a hearing officer from the CPE. \u201cThe other thing that was part of the changes in federal law was that if you\u2019re an employee and you have an investigation pending against you, you can\u2019t resign or retire,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cNo one can prevent an individual from quitting a job, but the new regulations require us to note on that employee\u2019s permanent records, employment records that they resigned or retired under an investigation.\u201d Before, there was no requirement for a former employer to disclose if the person under consideration for a job had left their previous position under a Title investigation. Potential new employers only knew of that if they asked. It is now required to disclose if someone left under investigation in a job recommendation. Wilkins said the people hiring the respondent do have to reach out to the university and ask about them, and if they do, their former supervisor must tell them about the investigation. If a student leaves under an investigation, that is also noted on their permanent record. Wilkins said if a student or an employee leaves the university loses jurisdiction over the process. \u201cWe can\u2019t force people who are no longer associated with us to come back and go through the processes,\u201d Wilkins said. From the case files the Herald received through open records requests, several of the cases appear to have ended because the employee left the university. Amid the Title policy changes, there is also now a requirement for the supervisors of the employee who is found to violate the policy to report back to the Title office in writing their decision on what to do within 10 days. \u201cWhen you\u2019re forced to look at objective decision making and make your own decision and sign your name to it, it makes it a little harder to excuse bad behavior,\u201d Wilkins said. The decision about consequences for the respondent goes to the super- visor and the vice president of their division because they are responsible for the people who report to them. Wilkins said they should be a part of this process. \u201cIt holds them accountable in two ways \u2014 one, accountable to address the bad behavior that\u2019s already happened, and it also makes them aware that they\u2019re also going to be held accountable for future bad behavior,\u201d Wilkins said. She said that in the past, supervisors have asked Title what they thought about the situation and asked for advice. At the level, Wilkins said some minor change to the Title policy should be going to the president\u2019s cabinet this week. This includes adding prevention of discrimination. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 39 Files \u2013 the breakdown Out of 39 cases the Herald received, five files had male complainants, 31 files had female complainants, two files had complainants from two genders and one case file\u2019s complainant gender could not be determined. There were 36 case files with male respondents and 3 case files with female respondents. Cases to note Within the records the Herald received, most of the names of those faculty and staff investigated were redacted. However, 12 records where found violations occurred or likely occurred did include the employee names. The records show that the university found violations of the Title policy in 12 of the 39 cases investigated did not redact the names of faculty or staff members who were found to have violated the policy in those instances. The files varied in size ranging from 15 pages to 293, totaling to 5,884 pages, varying based on the number of witnesses interviewed, evidence and who handled the case. \u201cThe only difference, and this is very innocent, is [that] you got two different people in charge,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cJoshua Hayes is very detail oriented and he documents everything and keeps everything so that\u2019s why you\u2019ll see a whole lot more in his files.\u201d Before June 30, 2015, the Director of the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and the Title coordinator was Huda Melky, who retired. The variance in the case files extends to how much is redacted. One example is in Case from the 2016 open records request, where words from WKU\u2019s own Discrimination and Harassment Policy from April 1, 2013, were redacted from the file the university turned over to the Herald. \u201cThis policy does not supersede or replace any grievance or complaint procedures contained in the [redacted] Handbook,\u201d the case file stated. There is another one word redaction in the \u201cMembers of the University Committee\u201d subsection and several one word redactions in the \u201cConsensual Relationship\u201d subsection. \u201cIt is impossible to understand why the university would redact part of a university policy that is otherwise publicly available,\u201d Abate said. \u201cThere is no good-faith basis for doing so.\u201d One of the 39 cases, Case from the Herald\u2019s 2021 open records request, is a student employee vs. student employee Title and Title report and investigation. The events on this file revolve around two former student employees at the Herald during the 2019-20 year. The files consist of emails and handwritten notes and do not have any formal memos stating whether or not the respondent violated any policies. Investigators recommended that the person accused complete two training sessions, and that person was not hired back at the Herald. The Herald is disclosing this information about this case to hold itself to the same standard as WKU. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 Cases with violations Kenneth Johnson Case Kenneth Johnson, former assistant director of student activities, was investigated for violating the sexual misconduct policy in 2014 after a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment. Other violations found Case B, from the 2016 request, involved Colleen Donovan, an academic readiness instructor, who found had violated the university\u2019s discrimination and harassment policy, according to the investigation in May 2014 female student in her class filed a complaint because she notified Donovan that she would need to miss a few classes due to medical reasons. Donovan told her that she does not accept medical excuses, that no one could help her, and that according to her syllabus if a student is absent from three classes the student\u2019s grade drops to the next lower grade. Donovan was no longer employed at the university after May 2014. In the complaint, the student said on several occasions that Johnson threatened to place a hold on her TopNet account to prevent her from registering for classes if she did not stop by his office to visit him and have dinner with him. The student said she initially thought Johnson had the authority to place a hold on her account, but later found out that he could not do that. Before learning that, she agreed to have dinner with him had knots in my stomach. It bothered me how he used his position as a form of manipulation,\u201d the student stated in the report. The student said she had seen other students experience similar occurrences with Johnson. In the investigation interviewed 24 witnesses. Some denied experiencing or witnessing any form of harassment. Other witnesses mentioned trying to avoid Johnson, hearing rumors about him dating or having \u201cflings\u201d with female students, saying Johnson was \u201cclose\u201d with female students. One witness said, \u201cIt was a running joke that if you wanted to get ahead, you would sleep with Kenneth.\u201d Another witness said Johnson would take her to lunch and dinner, one-on-one, approximately three times per week. He would pick her up at her home, and would play \u201cromantic\u201d music. Johnson had purchased alcohol for both of them at dinners. Based on the findings of the investigation, Johnson violated WKU\u2019s Standards of Conduct policy and Discrimination and Harassment policy in addition to Title of the Educational Amendments of 1972. The file does not indicate if Johnson retired or resigned, but he is no longer employed at WKU. Case C, from the 2016 open records request, involved Timothy Mullin, former director of the Kentucky Museum and Library, who was investigated for violating the sexual misconduct policy and gender based discrimination after he made sexual comments towards others. The records include complaints that surfaced of him sexually harassing male students and belittling and berating the female employees he supervised. Mullin died in 2020. Case D, from the 2016 request, involved Steve Briggs, assistant director of Housing and Residence Life, who found had violated the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy after an informal complaint filed by a female student on Nov. 12, 2014 university employee complained that Briggs rubbed her arm and poked her arm in the hallway, then approached her from behind and rested his hands on her hips. When she moved away, Briggs said, \u201cIt\u2019s just me.\u201d On Sep. 9, 2015, Briggs submitted a letter of resignation. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 Case E, from the 2021 open records request, involved Jim Hills, an events associate for WKU, who terminated on June 4, 2019, after the Title investigation regarding him concluded found that Hills would discuss inappropriate sexual matters with student workers. According to the document, Hills would compliment body parts, talk about women and stare in an uncomfortable way while setting up events with student workers, based on witness statements. Case F, from the 2021 request, involved Keith Clark, a senior academic advisor, who found had violated the sexual misconduct policy in 2018 after a complaint was filed on March 18. Clark had been sending Facebook messages to a University of Louisville employee from March 13-17. He sent the employee a video of him \u201cspanking/paddling\u201d himself. He also sent her a photo of him bent over a stool, wearing an apron, spanking his bare bottom with a paddle. Clark resigned from the university. Case F, from the 2016 request, follows an investigation against Michael Kallstrom, a professor in the music department. On Sept. 3, 2015 began looking into a report from an- other faculty member who expressed concern about Kallstrom\u2019s interactions with a student. The student said she went with a friend to see Kallstrom, and while the friend turned to answer a phone call, Kallstrom put his hand on her thigh. The university found that Kallstrom violated the university policy. He retired shortly after. Case G, from the 2021 records request, investigated a complaint that was received on Jan. 31, 2018, about Bryan Carson, coordinator of research instruction, grants and assessment. The complaint was in response to recurring incidents after a complaint against Carson in 2011. Based on the record, Carson made female employees and students feel unsafe around him. On Feb. 28, 2018, Carson resigned and was listed as ineligible for rehire at WKU. He then went to work at Missouri Valley College. Case A, from the 2021 request, investigated Ron Mitchell, an associate professor at WKU. On Oct. 3, 2017, Lisa Schneider, assistant to Athletics Director Todd Stewart, called Joshua Hayes to tell him about an issue with Mitchell and a female student. According to the documents provided, Mitchell invited the student to his house for lunch. He picked her up from Diddle Arena, took her to a \u201cbig house,\u201d went to a restaurant and then went to a different house. At the second house, Mitchell massaged her legs, back and feet, and continuously told her to release. During the massage, he told her that her clothes were dirty and that she needed to change into clothes he had for her. She said no. The student said no to the massage when he reached her upper thigh. She said Mitchell unfastened her bra, according to the documents, even though she said no. In an in-person conversation with Schneider and the student, Hayes asked how the student remained calm, she typed the answer on her phone felt sick. But was scared so could not say no.\u201d Mitchell resigned from the university on Oct. 18, 2017. Case C, from the 2021 request, investigated a complaint filed by an anonymous employee against Tim Boyer, access control locksmith, to the Title office in November 2020. On Nov. 17 at 10:10 am, there was an incident that was recorded by surveillance mentioned in the emails. \u201cWhile [redacted] was searching the key file storage, Tim rolled across the workshop floor in his office chair and positioned himself behind her while she was seated on the roller stool. The shop video shows Tim straddled within inches of her back and torso leaning over her shoulder. [Redact- ed] said she could feel his upper body/chest touching her back. The encounter lasted approximately one minute.\u201d In an email from Deborah Wilkins, she said there were three issues she thought were important to the case: there is video evidence regarding the complaint, Boyer is an \u201cat will\u201d employee so he can be terminated at any point, and Boyer had no meaningful excuse for his behavior in the video found that Boyer violated the sex and gender- based harassment, discrimination and retaliation policy. He was immediately terminated. Case D, from the 2021 request, dealt with Muhammad Sajjad, visiting assistant professor in physics and astronomy, who was \u201cdiscontinued\u201d and ineligible for rehire because a violation of policy was found. According to the records, the student told Hayes that she was standing by Sajjad\u2019s desk in the classroom behind the computer, and Sajjad was standing beside her, and his genitals were hitting her outer thigh. She clarified that Sajjad rubbed his genitals against her thigh in a side to side movement. Hayes asked how long Sajjad rubbed himself against her. She said Sajjad rubbed himself against her the entire time she was alphabetizing the exams, which took about five minutes. Case E, from the 2016 request, investigated a complaint that was filed against Brent Fisk, visual and performing arts library senior circulation assistant. According to the complaint, Fisk left his Pinterest ac-count open showing naked \u2014 \u201cspecifically topless\u201d \u2014 women on March 25, 2014. The incident was considered inappropriate use of technology. Co-workers said they felt uncomfortable around him since they were the same age and \u201ctype\u201d of women in the images Fisk had been looking at. From the documents provided, it is not clear whether Fisk resigned or was terminated from the university, but he did not continue to work at after 2015. \uf060 Cases with no violations The majority of the cases the Herald received were reports where no violation against university policies were determined. Cases and from the 2021 open records request had enough detail to be described thoroughly. Case On May 2, 2018, a student reached out to Peggy Crowe, director of the Counseling Center, about an email he had received from his Interdisciplinary Studies instructor that caused concern. The lead up to this email had been a conversation about planning a trip with the instructor and other students that the complainant would no longer be able to attend. Upon discovering the student could no longer attend the trip, the respondent sent an emotional response telling the complainant not to show up to the next class meeting he was supposed to attend as a peer mentor have a few days to deal with my loss and definitely do not want to fall apart in front of the class,\u201d the response from the employee in the file stated. From this interaction, the report and ensuing investigation revealed a long-time mentor-mentee relationship between the complainant and respondent. Instances involving heavily emotional conversations on the part of the respondent, multiple trips to conferences, a specific conversation involving bowties and Chippendale dancers and appearing in the complainant\u2019s personal life were discussed in the investigation. As the final email included in the file, the documents state that on Aug. 7, 2018, Hayes spoke to the respondent where he shared his findings and reminded him of three previously discussed points \u2014 encouraging the respondent to receive counseling, \u201cdiscouraging him from personal travel with students\u201d and having a separate room when traveling with students for work did not find a violation. Case On Sept. 17, 2018, a student reported a theater professor teaching Acting for the Camera whose name was redacted. The professor told the student, while she was undressed for a scene, that she could receive an \u201ceasy A.\u201d Other students urged her to report what happened due to a similar incident that occurred prior. In an interview with Hayes, the professor denied ever making the comment. The student was cast in a script written in a screenwriting class that one witness described as \u201cborderline pornographic.\u201d The student emailed the professor stating she was un- comfortable, to which the professor responded that they needed to talk further and that his \u201chands were tied.\u201d The student told a dance instructor who encouraged her to report the incident and said it was \u201cunacceptable.\u201d During the investigation, 15 witnesses were interviewed. One witness said that removing clothing for the \u201cfake porn\u201d scene was optional. Several witnesses mentioned not having any concerns about the professor, one referred to him as a \u201cfather figure.\u201d Other witnesses mentioned not feeling comfortable around him result of the investigation was a two-week period for students to decide if they are comfortable with their assigned script being added to the course syllabus. The professor was told to refrain from joking with students unless they have a \u201cmutual cohesive relationship.\u201d No violation of Title was found during this investigation. The investigation ended on Dec. 13, 2018. Herald staffers Michael J. Collins, Anna Leachman, Megan Fisher, Jacob Latimer, Shane Stryker, Jake Moore and Leo Bertucci contributed to this story. Alexandra Hendricks \uf060 Digital News Editor Debra Murray can be reached at [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter @debramurrayy Editor-in-Chief Lily Burris can be reached at lily.burris203@topper. wku.edu. Follow her on Twitter @lily_burris."} |
7,486 | Sebastian Knowles | Ohio State University | [
"7486_101.pdf"
] | {"7486_101.pdf": "\uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 Lost in Transition: Northwestern visiting professor\u2019s past raises questions about hiring process Ally Mutnick, Reporter May 5, 2015 An Ohio State University investigator found last year the then-chair of the university\u2019s English department had \u201ccreated a hostile work environment\u201d that made female administrative staff feel \u201charassed and intimidated.\u201d \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 That English professor, Sebastian Knowles, is now a visiting professor at Northwestern for Spring Quarter 2015 series of interviews conducted by the investigator with department staff painted Knowles as \u201cvolatile\u201d and described violations of Ohio State\u2019s policies on sexual harassment and workplace violence. The investigator found Knowles threatened and intimidated department staff. According to the report, staff said he initiated \u201cinappropriate and unwelcome physical contact\u201d and made \u201cinappropriate comments of a sexual nature\u201d on several occasions. Knowles refutes these claims and any wrongdoing. In a written rebuttal, he admits to losing his temper and cursing at staff, but attributes this to stress brought on by an illness. He denies making sexual comments, claiming they were taken out of context, and said the staff members themselves initiated inappropriate sexual remarks said it was unaware of the allegations against Knowles but will review the matter. In interviews administrators said it\u2019s difficult to learn professors\u2019 past disciplinary records in a hiring process complicated by privacy laws and heavily focused on candidates\u2019 academic merit. \u201cIf someone misbehaves at some institution, there are not good mechanisms for communicating that,\u201d said mathematics Prof. John Franks, the Weinberg senior associate dean for faculty. \u201cThat information is usually completely private.\u201d The issue extends beyond NU. Administrators and experts who study campus safety say it\u2019s a widespread problem caused by a lack of methods for colleges to vet candidates beyond their resumes, writing samples and reference letters. Schools communicate very little during the hiring process. \u201cFrankly, some of those people who are causing trouble for the department \u2014 department chairs or deans want to get rid of them,\u201d said John D. Foubert, an Oklahoma State University professor of higher education who studies campus sexual assault. \u201cThere\u2019s a practice among some people,\u201d he said. \u201cThey call it, \u2018Pass the trash.\u2019\u201d The Ohio State investigation \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 During Knowles\u2019 time as department chair, an administrative staff member hesitated when he asked her to increase a co-worker\u2019s salary, according to Ohio State\u2019s investigation report. Knowles slammed his fist on the desk, grabbed a paper from the woman and told her to \u201cshut up and listen.\u201d Just 10 minutes later, he was back in the woman\u2019s office apologizing, the investigator wrote in the report, which The Daily obtained from Ohio State\u2019s public records office love you,\u201d the woman recounted Knowles saying love you love you. I\u2019m so sorry for yelling at you.\u201d Knowles put his arm around her and, according to the report, pulled her close and said, \u201cWe just need to hug. I\u2019m so sorry.\u201d The report described Knowles\u2019 interactions with female administrative staff who worked for him during his time as chair. The two women mentioned in the report declined to speak with The Daily for this story, but their interviews for the investigation give a detailed account of Knowles\u2019 misconduct. The women reported Knowles repeatedly made them upset and uncomfortable. One woman described a pattern of \u201cvolatile outbursts,\u201d followed by apologies and gifts, including $300. Staff reported to the investigator \u201cmultiple incidents of unwanted physical contact.\u201d In an official written response to the allegations, Knowles said claims of unwanted touching and comments from one administrative staff member could be \u201csimply rebutted\u201d because she once gave him a hug and made a comment about ejaculation. According to the report, Knowles told the investigator the staff member said the word \u201cself-ejaculation\u201d when it appeared while she was using a spell checker. One woman said Knowles compared his feelings seeing her stretch to the way he feels when seeing his wife in the bathtub. Knowles wrote in his rebuttal that this was an attempt to explain he found the situation \u201cawkward\u201d and wanted to avert his gaze. The investigator found Knowles \u201crepeatedly initiated physical contact, including hugging and kissing, with female staff members,\u201d who reported the behavior to be unwanted \u201cin every instance.\u201d Knowles acknowledged this conduct but denied the behaviors had any \u201csexual \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 motivation\u201d and told the investigator no bodily fluids were exchanged. In his findings, the investigator noted Knowles\u2019 response to the claims indicated a failure to understand what behaviors constitute sexual harassment. Knowles told The Daily he did nothing wrong and declined to comment further on the investigation, deferring to his written rebuttal. He wrote in the rebuttal he was not given a chance to resolve the complaint internally. The university\u2019s guidelines on harassment investigations say a supervisor should decide if the matter can be handled in the department or if Ohio State\u2019s human resources office should investigate. He also complained the investigator failed to take into account \u201csevere mental stress\u201d brought on by personal illness and his mother\u2019s health problems. Although Knowles told the investigator the two women made sexual comments, the investigator found those claims to be unsubstantiated. Knowles agreed on Dec. 12, 2013 to take a voluntary leave from his position as chair. He was permitted to continue teaching during the 2014 spring semester because the misconduct concerned his role as department chair, not as a professor, according to the report. Throughout his career, Knowles has garnered a slew of teaching awards. An Irish literature scholar, he is the president of the International James Joyce Foundation and the editor of a book series on James Joyce. Ohio State began investigating Knowles\u2019 conduct in mid-December 2013 and issued the final case report in February 2014. The two women mentioned in the investigation moved to work in different departments at the university. The investigator wrote in his conclusions Ohio State will take \u201cappropriate corrective action\u201d against Knowles based on the policy violations but did not suggest any specific actions. He also noted Knowles would benefit from sexual harassment training. The investigation file and subsequent interviews with professors in the English department made clear that top officials from Ohio State were familiar with complaints about Knowles\u2019 behavior. In a March 2014 meeting, administrators asked English department faculty and staff to act professionally toward Knowles and welcome him back, said Ohio State English Prof. Koritha Mitchell. It was a request some in the department found to be a dismissive approach to sexual harassment claims, she said. Professors at the meeting said administrators told the department the file could be requested from the university\u2019s public records office. Under Ohio\u2019s Public Records Act, anyone can request a \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 record from a public office, including a state university. Hiring at Knowles will be at for Spring Quarter only. He is the Carole and Gordon Segal Visiting Professor of Irish Literature, a position endowed by the alumni couple who co-founded the furniture store Crate & Barrel. The selection process for the position is less intensive than for a full-time professor and the candidate pool is smaller, limited to those who specialize in Irish literature invites scholars to the position after a department subcommittee nominates candidates, said English and Communication Prof. Susan Manning, a former chair of NU\u2019s English department. Prof. Laurie Shannon, current chair of the English department, did not respond to requests for comment for this article. Knowles, who spoke to The Daily about the hiring process but not the investigation, said he was first asked about the position six years ago. He wasn\u2019t available then, but when asked again last year, he submitted a resume with references. The Weinberg dean sent a letter offering him the position about six weeks later, he said. The typical hiring process for a tenure-track professor, both for the English department and for the rest of the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, is more thorough. Candidates submit an application letter, a research statement, a description of their teaching philosophy and letters of recommendation, said Franks, the Weinberg senior associate dean for faculty. Applicants are first reviewed by a hiring committee then by the department. Top candidates visit campus to interview, meet with faculty and may give a lecture on their area of expertise. After department faculty vote, final hiring decisions are made by the dean of the school and then the provost. Each school at has slight variations in the hiring process, but most follow this model, said Prof. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, associate provost for faculty administrators said it\u2019s not common practice for the University to ask for personnel files or disciplinary records of candidates. University spokesman Al Cubbage said did not know of Knowles\u2019 policy violations at Ohio State before offering him the position. Depending on the state, parts of a personnel file, including disciplinary records, may be protected by privacy laws. For public institutions could, in some cases, submit a request under a state\u2019s open record laws. But faculty often don\u2019t want their employers to know they are contemplating a move and faculty searches are kept confidential, Provost Daniel Linzer said. \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 Most of Weinberg\u2019s new hires are Ph.D. or postdoctoral students who have not held faculty positions before, Franks said. But for those coming from other universities, Franks said hopes letters reveal any sexual misconduct or disciplinary infractions. The University sometimes solicits additional reference letters from experts in the candidate\u2019s field. He said Weinberg has on some occasions asked for a personnel file for a potential senior hire if they detect \u201ca cause for concern.\u201d For the English department, Manning also said references are important but department staff also rely on \u201cintuition and judgment\u201d when evaluating a new hire. \u201cThere is a sense of professionalism where we do assume that if someone comes recommended by six of our colleagues in the field,\u201d she said, \u201cwe are not assuming we\u2019re hiring people that have a past that is covered up bigger problem is not the only school to unknowingly hire a professor accused of misconduct. In May 2014, Loyola University Chicago found itself in a similar situation after it hired Miguel H. D\u00edaz, a former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican who previously taught at the University of Dayton in Ohio. While D\u00edaz was at Dayton, an investigation conducted by outside counsel found he likely engaged in \u201cunwelcome conduct of a sexual nature\u201d toward a married couple who worked with him at the Catholic university, according to a letter obtained by the website Inside Higher Ed. The confidential letter from the provost to the married couple acknowledged the couple\u2019s concerns that D\u00edaz had sexually harassed them through \u201cvarious requests and references to explicitly sexual feelings\u201d even after being told to stop. Though it was sent in July 2013, the letter was not made public until May 2014, after D\u00edaz had already made plans to leave Dayton for Loyola. After the sexual harassment accusations came to light, Inside Higher Ed reported Loyola reviewed the allegations against D\u00edaz and ultimately decided not to withdraw their offer. He became a professor at Loyola last year. Controversies surrounding University of Illinois Prof. James Kilgore, a convicted criminal who was involved with a 1975 bank robbery that left one person dead, and Pennsylvania State University\u2019s Jerry Sandusky have sparked conversation of faculty background checks. \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 After Sandusky, an assistant football coach, was found guilty of sexually abusing young boys \u2014 some on Penn State\u2019s campus \u2014 the university began conducting background checks on new hires and on volunteers who work with children. Other Big Ten universities, including the University of Michigan and the University of Illinois, followed suit with similar policies. Linzer said does background checks on some hires, but the process is too complicated to replicate for every new hire. Some information that appears in background checks is sensitive, and may not want to distribute it to the hiring committee. The University also has to give professors a chance to respond to findings, which can slow the hiring process, Linzer said. It also puts in the position of deciding a fair system for what kind of infraction would invalidate a candidate. \u201cIf a potential faculty member was caught smoking marijuana as an undergraduate,\u201d Linzer said, \u201cis that grounds for saying you\u2019re not eligible for a faculty position? \u2026 The question is where do you draw the line?\u201d Other occupations incorporate background checks into the hiring process. Some states require checks in professions ranging from teachers to school bus drivers to mortgage salesmen. Although background checks can pick up criminal infractions and lawsuits filed against a candidate, violations of university sexual misconduct policies would not surface. That information can usually be provided only by the university or the candidate flaw in the system For a student trying to transfer to another university or matriculate to a graduate school, it\u2019s much harder to hide a violation of a sexual misconduct policy. Many applications, including The Common Application, ask students to authorize another institution to access their transcript and some student conduct information from a former school receives several hundred requests for student conduct records from other universities students have applied to transfer to or attend, said Dean of Students Todd Adams will reveal student conduct issues only if the violation resulted in a suspension, expulsion or exclusion from certain University privileges and activities, Adams said. If a student received one of these disciplinary sanctions will report that to the inquiring university along with the policy \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 the student breached. Adams said this is a common practice nationwide. In its guidelines for handling allegations of sexual misconduct, the Association for Student Conduct Administration recommends universities indicate suspensions or expulsions on a student\u2019s transcript to ensure any future institution the student attends is aware of any behavioral issues. But professors typically aren\u2019t subject to this level of scrutiny and don\u2019t have common, transcript- like documents they are required to show when applying for new teaching positions personnel record is the common thread among all professors who transfer from one university to another. State laws vary in how much information from these files universities or other agencies can disclose. In some states, these disciplinary records are completely confidential and protected even from open records law requests. The Illinois Personnel Record Review Act, however, has a provision that allows employers to disclose to a third party a \u201cdisciplinary report, letter of reprimand, or other disciplinary action\u201d that is less than four years old if they notify the employee. Cubbage said the University is aware of the law but, as a matter of practice, does not disclose any information about employees except the dates of employment and the position held. \u201cWe would never share a faculty member\u2019s personnel file with another institution unless required to do so by a court,\u201d Franks said. It\u2019s not a practice unique to NU. Schools do not typically communicate with one another during the hiring process or ask for disciplinary records. However, even if the practice were common, experts in campus safety and employment law say there are multiple deterrents to disclosure. Schools may choose not to reveal misconduct findings to a third party because it could open them up to lawsuits from professors who want to challenge the validity of a school\u2019s investigation processes, said Aaron Maduff, a Chicago employment lawyer university could spend months tied up in costly litigation. Disclosing records makes it hard for a university to keep the results discreet, said Esther Seitz, an Illinois lawyer knowledgeable in public records law. If a private university sends employee disciplinary files to a state school, those records then become part of that school\u2019s file and can be requested by anyone under state open record laws. Then there are schools that have a problematic professor with tenure. Telling another institution about faculty members\u2019 misconduct could mean they won\u2019t leave their current post, said Foubert, the Oklahoma State higher education professor. \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 But in states with strong open record laws, there is often nothing legally stopping a university from checking a professor\u2019s past disciplinary record. And none of the reasons to keep sexual misconduct findings secret are more important than protecting students, said sociology Prof. Laura Beth Nielsen, NU\u2019s director of legal studies. \u201cWe could take a more assertive role in vetting incoming professors by asking for these records in states where we\u2019re allowed,\u201d she said. \u201cSo then why aren\u2019t we doing that?\u201d The Ludlow case In spring 2012, NU\u2019s Title Coordinator Joan Slavin sent former Weinberg dean Sarah Mangelsdorf the results of her investigation on philosophy Prof. Peter Ludlow. \u201cLudlow repeatedly refused to answer whether he has had any sexual, dating, or romantic relationships with Northwestern undergraduate or graduate students,\u201d Slavin wrote am concerned that Ludlow may have a pattern of using his position as a faculty member to engage in sexual or romantic relationships with young female students.\u201d In the investigation, Slavin substantiated many of the claims made by a Medill senior who said Ludlow sexually assaulted her after a February 2012 art show the two attended together in downtown Chicago. Through his lawyer, Ludlow has denied the student\u2019s claims and sued for defamation. The suit was later dismissed. More than 19 months after Slavin\u2019s investigation, Ludlow alluded to a job change on Facebook by linking to a post on a philosophy blog that announced he would move to Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. According to the blog, he was hired as director of Rutgers\u2019 Center for Cognitive Science, where he had been a visiting professor in fall 2012. The move seemed certain. The blog\u2019s writer, University of Chicago Prof. Brian Leiter, told The Daily in February 2014 he had learned the information from both Rutgers and Ludlow. Slavin had asked the student to keep confidential the limited findings she had shared with her from her investigation on Ludlow. NU\u2019s investigation didn\u2019t become public knowledge until February 2014 when, frustrated with the University\u2019s handling of her reported sexual assault, the student filed a Title lawsuit against the school. What had been hidden in personnel files and confidential emails could now be easily accessed online. \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 The day after news broke of Ludlow\u2019s alleged sexual misconduct, Rutgers balked. At the time, spokesman Greg Trevor told The Daily that Rutgers was not aware of the allegations in the lawsuit and would not confirm the school had offered Ludlow a position or that he had accepted. In July 2014, Rutgers announced Ludlow would not join its faculty and pushed blame toward Ludlow for not being forthcoming with details of alleged misconduct at NU. \u201cWhen Rutgers learned of allegations against Professor Ludlow at Northwestern, the university requested relevant information from Professor Ludlow and his attorney,\u201d the spokesman wrote in a statement. \u201cThis information was not provided. As a result, Professor Ludlow will not be coming to Rutgers University.\u201d Ludlow\u2019s attorney Kristin Case said the requested information could not be provided because of confidentiality issues declined to comment, citing pending litigation. Mobilizing under the campus group Women Organizing Against Harassment, Rutgers students protested Ludlow\u2019s candidacy and petitioned their university to vet candidates for sexual misconduct. The university\u2019s near hiring of Ludlow left some students feeling shaken, said Maci Nordone, a member of WOAH. \u201cWe still don\u2019t really know how to prevent something like this from happening in the future,\u201d said Nordone, a Rutgers sophomore. \u201cWhat if this didn\u2019t come up in the news? Then he could be here right now.\u201d Worried about Ludlow\u2019s plans to move to Rutgers, a group of about 20 concerned professors wrote a petition in February 2014 to the Board of Trustees asking them to make sure \u201cprofessors who have been determined (by campus or legal processes) to have committed sexual harassment, violence, or abuse shall not be \u2018passed on\u2019 to other Universities.\u201d With the hiring process centered on a candidate\u2019s academic record, experts say it\u2019s easy for disciplinary infractions to go unnoticed. Rutgers was unaware of the allegations against Ludlow just as was unaware of Knowles\u2019 misconduct at Ohio State. \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0 \u201cMight we be vulnerable to hiring someone who committed academic fraud? Plagiarism? It could be anything have no idea,\u201d University President Morton Schapiro told The Daily in March. \u201cIt\u2019s a fair question.\u201d Photo illustration by Jackie Marthouse and Sean Su/Daily Senior Staffers Email: [email protected] Twitter: @allymutnick The Daily Northwestern \u2022 Copyright 2025 WordPress Theme by \u2022 Log in \uf0c9 \uf062 \uf164 \uf39e \ue61b \uf0e0"} |
8,325 | John Phillips | School of the Art Institute of Chicago | [
"8325_101.pdf",
"8325_102.pdf",
"8325_103.pdf"
] | {"8325_101.pdf": "Inside the fight for racial equity at Current and former students, staff, and faculty at the top-ranked art school describe microaggressions, discrimination, and a failed anti-racism campaign. by Kerry Cardoza January 6, 2021 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 1/15 Credit: David Alvarado \u201cI\u2019 m Sorry.\u201d That was the subject line of a university-wide e-mail sent by School of the Art Institute of Chicago provost Martin Berger, an e-mail that many had waited almost two years for. In September 2018, as the newly hired dean of faculty, Berger presented his work studying photography and the civil rights movement to a room of hundreds of faculty and staff, including some security and food service workers. Berger is tall and well-manicured, with a bald head and light blue eyes. One faculty member described him as so anxious he was hard to be around. In staff meetings held on Zoom and uploaded 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 2/15 to YouTube, he speaks methodically and with little emotion, well-versed at giving pro forma answers that don\u2019t reveal too much. Berger did not respond to requests for comment for this story. The mood at the meeting, which had an open bar and gave employees across the school a rare opportunity to get together, was festive. During his talk, Berger quoted the Black activist Elizabeth Eckford, one of the Little Rock Nine, the first Black students to integrate an all-white Arkansas high school, using the N-word. It sent shock waves through the room. Berger would later apologize individually to those who complained about his choice of words, though for months he defended his usage on the grounds of academic freedom. In an interview, he explained that he used Eckford\u2019s own words \u201cin an effort to return agency to the young black activist\u201d and \u201cto illuminate her actions and thoughts.\u201d It\u2019s apparent that he didn\u2019t grasp the gravity of the situation, that he didn\u2019t expect his actions to have ripple effects. \u201cRecent conversations with the incoming and outgoing members of Student Government and Graduate Senate convinced me of the need to send an apology to students for my September 2018 talk,\u201d he wrote in his e-mail this June. \u201cIt should have come much sooner.\u201d The debate around free speech on college campuses is of course nothing new. And if this had been an isolated incident, perhaps what happened at one of the nation\u2019s top-ranked art schools might not have reverbated as long and as far as it did. But just six months after the lecture in question, with unheeded calls by faculty to have an open forum, Berger was promoted to provost after an opaque hiring process. This sequence of events, involving an act of harm committed on members of the school\u2019s community that was inadequately addressed, and a lack of transparency, accountability, and communication around school policy, illustrates what many consider the status quo at spoke to over a dozen current and former students, staff, and faculty who described a toxic atmosphere for BIPOC, replete with microaggressions or outright discrimination, where complaints are dealt with individually, rather than systemically, if they are dealt with at all. Like many other institutions in the art world, this year has pledged to address systemic racism on its campus, with a newly formed anti-racism committee, among other initiatives. But with Berger, an increasingly problematic figure, as one of the most powerful people at the school, and above him President Elissa Tenny, who has also fielded calls to resign this year, many wonder if real change is possible. n March 12, President Tenny announced that spring break would be extended due to the rapidly worsening coronavirus pandemic. Students initially expected to be back in a few weeks, but the downtown Chicago campus largely shut down and classes went remote for the rest of the semester. While that shift might be abrupt for any school, for art students without access to studios or to vast facilities, the ability to complete certain assignments was completely cut off. Students in designed objects or sculpture were suddenly without access to the woodshop and other fabrication equipment; ceramics students went 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 3/15 without pottery wheels or kilns; photography students had no editing workstations and no access to scanners, the darkroom, or the school\u2019s print services. Tenny, SAIC\u2019s first female president, is in her late 60s, with shoulder-length, hay-colored hair and bangs that frame her face. She\u2019s prone to wearing eclectic jewelry, the kind you\u2019d find in a museum gift shop. Many community members spoke to described Tenny as out of touch or ineffective. In a meeting posted on YouTube, she stumbles over her words, and cracks a smile when addressing staff concerns that e-mails are being monitored. At another point, she says know we\u2019ve all read articles about how challenging it has been for people working from home raising kids,\u201d as if this isn\u2019t a reality for many of her actual employees. Tenny did not respond to requests for comment. On April 20, the Black Student Union (later renamed Blk @ SAIC) published a set of demands for the administration asking for universal credit for the semester, continued pay for all employees, and new sustainable practices regarding accountability and financial stability. The organizers also released a survey to the community, asking what resources folks needed and if they had safety concerns. After just five days, the survey received more than 500 signatures and almost 200 people shared testimonials. \u201cWe pay to go to the school to have access to facilities and studio space and we may not all have that at home,\u201d says Hayley Bain, one of the current leaders of Blk @ SAIC, who spoke to over Zoom. Bain, who wears glamorously oversized tortoise-shell glasses and a septum ring, is in her fourth year and primarily makes works on paper. \u201cSo to act as if we all do is very presumptuous. Even for academic classes as well, home is a different space for everybody. So completing academic work is going to look different.\u201d Just days before the extended spring break began, FNewsmagazine, the school\u2019s newspaper, published a story with the headline \u201cWhen the Dean Said a Slur, And Then Got Promoted,\u201d detailing Berger\u2019s use of the N- word and subsequent promotion. While faculty was already aware that this had happened, the article ensured that now everyone at was. Perhaps the story wouldn\u2019t have had much of an impact, with everyone isolated at home with the pandemic to worry about. But the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement in late May, and SAIC\u2019s participation in Blackout Tuesday on Instagram, a social media campaign meant to serve as a day of reflection following George Floyd\u2019s murder, helped resurface the incident. On June 10, Tenny sent out a statement detailing the school\u2019s renewed commitment to anti-racism. \u201cWhile the world is gripped with a fervor to recognize and take decisive action against systemic racism, we cannot fail to act as an institution,\u201d she wrote. She outlined the steps the institution would take, including the establishment of an emergency relief fund for students, the formation of an anti-racism committee, a day of mourning for all staff, a $25,000 donation to be split among seven nonprofits in North Lawndale, and continued \u201cefforts to build diverse hiring pools for positions throughout the institution, especially among full-time, tenure-track faculty.\u201d Another paragraph detailed the continuation of initiatives that support the Black and Brown members 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 4/15 of campus, such as scholarships for Chicago Public Schools students, programming in North Lawndale, and grants which support diverse campus projects and curricula. Many students, staff, and faculty felt that these efforts were far from enough. In an open letter to Tenny published in FNews on June 9, junior Sherman White called the president\u2019s statement \u201cnot revolutionary, but reactionary.\u201d \u201cYou have a chance to prove yourself a true ally,\u201d White wrote. \u201cIt is not enough to not be racist. You must be anti-racist.\u201d White called on the president to condemn the Chicago Police Department, to publicly reprimand Berger, and to cease using Black students\u2019 artwork as a prop of solidarity. (Alum Charly Palmer\u2019s recent Time magazine cover of a Black girl above a bleeding bunch of roses, a blazing battle scene in her hair, was featured on the university\u2019s website.) As for the $25,000 donation, White pointed out that it amounted to just $3,571 per nonprofit, or \u201calmost $2000 less than it cost to take a course here at Change.org petition calling for Berger\u2019s resignation was published just a few days later. \u201cBerger continues to . . . defend his use of the n-word,\u201d the petition stated. \u201cIn the spirit of justice we believe the provost position should be filled by a BIPOC.\u201d To date, it has garnered more than 2,500 signatures. Dozens of signatories left comments showing their disgust and disillusion with the school. \u201cInexcusable. Resign,\u201d wrote one commenter. \u201cThis school has yet to do much of anything for their students of color,\u201d wrote another. Tenny\u2019s disconnect with the realities of members of the campus was also made apparent through her announcement of the passing of Lynika Strozier. Strozier, a Black woman, died of complications from coronavirus in June. She was 35. Strozier worked at as coordinator for the Science and Bio Art Labs and was also an adjunct professor at Malcolm College. Tenny initially sent out a notification of Strozier\u2019s passing only to faculty and staff, which the school says is standard practice. Weeks later she sent out a second e-mail, including students, acknowledging that \u201cour practice of notifying only faculty and staff of staff members\u2019 deaths has not been followed consistently, understandably upsetting a number of students.\u201d Tenny also acknowledged that the e-mail raised concerns because Strozier\u2019s death was COVID-19-related, which has disproportionately impacted people of color. \u201cOur feelings of grief over the impact of this terrible pandemic and anger that systemic racism make[s] some of us more vulnerable are real, and those feelings were exacerbated by the poor handling of the message,\u201d she wrote. \u201cThe messaging error was unintentional, and am sorry GoFundMe to help with hospital and funeral expenses has thus far gathered more than $84,000 in donations, including a $500 donation from Tenny. In July, Tenny and Berger announced a new undergraduate scholarship in Strozier\u2019s name. n June 30, an e-mail went out to all the student workers in the admissions office, letting them know that their hours for the summer had been cut to almost nothing. Undergraduate student Nadia 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 5/15 Frierson described the e-mail as tone-deaf; it included a meme of a viral moment from a protest when a woman told a cop, \u201cYou about to lose your job.\u201d \u201cThis is a big issue because everybody\u2019s depending on this job to pay their rent,\u201d Frierson tells me over the phone. \u201cWe did lose our jobs, basically. Like we\u2019re employed but we\u2019re not getting paid.\u201d Frierson and colleagues pushed back against the e-mail, and their office held a Zoom call where student workers could air grievances. There were a lot. Many centered around Frances Pleines, who was then the director of undergraduate admissions. Staff and students alike reported that Pleines engaged in racial profiling and discrimination of students, making comments like \u201cMexicans are very hard working and therefore good employees\u201d or that \u201cfemale Indian student workers were \u2018lazy.'\u201d Pleines would reportedly handpick students of color to participate in photo shoots for admissions marketing materials. She was known to misgender transgender students and alumni, often referring to them by their dead names. There were dozens of other complaints, detailing a pattern of psychological harassment, pitting students and staff against one another, and inappropriately sharing personal information, among other workplace abuses. It wasn\u2019t until staff were able to work remotely, out of earshot of Pleines and other authority figures on campus whom they feared retaliation from, that they realized others were having the same negative experiences. Pleines declined to comment on these allegations. These grievances, obtained by the Reader, were collected and sent to the vice president of enrollment. Pleines left the school over the summer, though the Reader couldn\u2019t confirm if she was fired. Staff and students, however, say that Rose Milkowski, the vice president of enrollment management, and Asia Mitchell, the executive director of undergraduate admissions, were at least partially aware of Pleines\u2019s behavior, and fielded their own complaints. (Milkowski and Mitchell did not comment on these allegations.) After the admissions office Zoom call, the student workers met with other students and staff and decided to do more campus-wide organizing. Dismantle SAIC, also known as Solidarity, was formed. Currently made up of Frierson and fellow undergraduates Nicholas Zepeda and Oyemi, Dismantle released their own Google survey, asking students, staff, contracted workers, and alumni whether they faced discrimination at the school. Almost 300 people submitted responses: 44 percent of respondents said they\u2019d been discriminated against, with another 31 percent not sure if their treatment could be categorized that way. Many respondents described painful experiences with the upper administration, mishandled sexual assault cases, racist course material, misgendering by professors, a refusal to be given proper disability accommodations, and a general lack of support for students. Even more responses were sent through e-mail or Instagram DM. At the end of June, Dismantle wrote a comprehensive, 13-page letter to Tenny, Milkowski, and then- interim dean of faculty Jefferson Pinder demanding action. (Pinder, who is Black, has since been made 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 6/15 director of academic affairs for diversity, equity, and inclusion. He also heads the new anti-racism committee, which reports to Tenny.) According to FNews, seven admissions staffers who signed a letter in support of Solidarity were let go over the summer. Dismantle enumerated the reasons for concern: the initial silence on Berger\u2019s use of the N-word, his subsequent promotion, the petition calling for his resignation, and his belated apology; the layoffs of staff at the Art Institute after calling for more transparency around downsizing and plans to reopen the museum; an incident reported in the Sun-Times in which a former student was allegedly subjected to sex discrimination and physical abuse by then-faculty member John Phillips (according to a lawsuit filed by the student, Phillips was fired in 2016), the student\u2019s direct adviser; and missteps by Tenny regarding her announcement of the death of Strozier. The demands fall into four broad categories: more accountability in the admissions office; reform to the curriculum, including decentering whiteness and white art; hiring more faculty of color; and providing more financial and institutional support to students is a non-profit institution and should prioritize their commitment to the public good and its students over for-profit business practices,\u201d the letter states. In my conversations with current and former students, faculty, and staff, many pointed to the school\u2019s prioritization of profit over academic scholarship and student well-being. Several casually mentioned Tenny\u2019s salary; in 2019, her total compensation topped $711,000, which includes a housing stipend of $4,000 per month. For Dismantle SAIC, Tenny\u2019s financial security directly informs the disconnect between their needs as students and the institution\u2019s inability to adequately address them. After months of meeting with the administration and little progress to show for it, Dismantle calculated their hours and sent a request for compensation. From June 18 to August 23, three of the main student organizers had each worked 362 hours. \u201cWhile they did not come into this journey with the intention of being compensated, the exaggerated timeline of this project has presented Frierson, Ivory and Zepeda with extensive mental and physical strain from working with/at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago,\u201d they wrote to Tenny, Milkowski, and Pinder. According to Frierson, the administration asked how the students would like to be compensated, though payment and tuition adjustments were off the table. Dismantle decided not to respond representative from the school counters that the students received a stipend. Meanwhile, due to work hours being dramatically cut, Frierson lost their housing over the summer think [Tenny]\u2019s one of those white women that really doesn\u2019t understand the magnitude of the situation, that she\u2019s been having a part in actively oppressing people,\u201d Frierson says. Because of Tenny\u2019s secure position, aided by her housing stipend, Frierson felt it was clear that the president was oblivious to the economic realities of her students. 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 7/15 Frierson is a fifth-year student who works mostly in the fibers department, creating beautiful geometric assemblages with handmade paper. Their admission to the school is deeply personal. Decades ago their father was discouraged from attending SAIC; he was essentially told he\u2019d never make it as a Black architect. Their father and grandmother have both made tremendous financial sacrifices to allow Frierson to attend. \u201cMy ancestors did a lot of work to put me where I\u2019m at so should appreciate the privilege that have been able to access thus far,\u201d they said. Lisa Vinebaum, the chair of the fiber and material studies department, says the compensation of upper administration underscores the lack of progressive vision. In ten years at SAIC, Vinebaum has been a part of many efforts to bring greater equity to the school. Her work often explores topics of labor justice or how art can play a role in social change. \u201cThe question is, what kind of institution do we want to be?\u201d Vinebaum says, noting that the school falls short of its ideals. \u201cWe know what kind of school we are. We\u2019re a corporate art school that is trying to present itself as something that is progressive and forward-thinking and aligned with Chicago and trying to make change. But at the end of the day, it\u2019s not.\u201d According to the school\u2019s 2018 tax returns, the total compensation of Tenny and the other highest- compensated administrators amounted to more than $3.2 million. This doesn\u2019t include ten other VP-level executives. All but two people in the president\u2019s 18-member cabinet are white. The majority of the school\u2019s revenue, 77 percent in fiscal year 2019, comes from tuition and student fees. The cost of one year of undergraduate tuition is $52,000, which doesn\u2019t include any fees or housing expenses. Tuition increases an average of 2-4 percent per year. Though students asked not to raise tuition this year as much learning continues to take place remotely, the school went ahead with their scheduled increase for all students with the exception of Pell Grant recipients, those with the most financial need, about 22 percent of the student population. It is easy to see student\u2019s frustrations with their institution\u2014they know their money is lining the pockets of the administration, and yet their concerns are consistently overlooked. n June 11, faculty chair Beth Wright sent an e-mail out to faculty that, like many communiqu\u00e9s from the institution, toes the line between coldly professional and empathic. \u201cIt is hard, right now, to be resident in this country. On all sides there is pain: physical, spiritual, economic, mental,\u201d Wright begins. \u201cIs it more important to protect our community by not gathering on campus in any form at the price of precipitous enrollment drops, or by doing all we can to maintain everyone\u2019s livelihoods and health insurance at the cost of possible risk of infection? The choices are hard, and do not think can dismiss or blame people who make different choices than do in each case would like us to be generous when we disagree about the best way forward for ourselves and our community, remembering that none of us believe cops killing people of color is okay.\u201d \u201cIt was really insensitive,\u201d says one faculty member, noting the very real precariousness of many part-time employees. \u201cDon\u2019t say none of us believe cops killing people of color is OK. That\u2019s obviously not true. That\u2019s why they keep getting off when they kill people of color.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 8/15 By early summer, many other complaints against the school or specific departments were being made publicly. Alum Adreain Jovan Guillory shared a video on Instagram, noting that the fashion department had reached out to him, asking for images of his work as a means of standing with the Black Lives Matter movement. Guillory declined, saying \u201cWe\u2019re out here dying, so a post is not really doing anything for me.\u201d Jax McFarland, a former graduate student in the architecture, interior architecture, and designed objects department, also posted a video to Instagram, detailing some of the racism he experienced in his department, which he eventually discussed with the Title office and Tenny. She referred McFarland to Berger have to sit down with the guy who uses the N-word who thinks he\u2019s some white savior, that he\u2019s not biased,\u201d McFarland says. After the meeting, Berger waived McFarland\u2019s tuition, while officially determining there was no wrongdoing. \u201cPretty much what Martin tried to do was silence me by adjusting my financial aid,\u201d McFarland said in the video group of staff in the admissions office also wrote an open letter in support of the admissions \u201cstudent ambassadors\u2019 demands that leadership address racism and unethical workplace practices.\u201d Anna Martine Whitehead, an adjunct professor in the contemporary practices department, began talking and reaching out to other Black faculty members, trying to come up with a plan to support the demands coming from BSU, Dismantle, and other students. These faculty members formed the collective Black Futures to try to synthesize all these grievances and lay out a vision to move forward. When Black Futures first coalesced, Whitehead was struck by how frequently Tenny and Berger tried to handle complaints with private meetings or conversations. Again and again, administrators try to isolate and individualize issues, propose a plan they feel comfortable with, and forego any chance of systemic change. \u201cIt uses their work to kind of gather together a group of folks and get names from those groups, and join the committee without actually taking seriously the demands of those groups,\u201d one member of Black Futures says. Carly Maria Trujillo, an undergraduate student and a co-leader of the Native American Student Association (NASA), worked with Dismantle over the summer to present to Tenny a proposal to rename the school\u2019s Columbus building, an informal name stemming from its location on Columbus Drive had proposed renaming the building \u201cThree Fires,\u201d after the Three Fires Confederacy, made up of the Ojibwe, Potawatomi, and Odawa tribes which resided in the Chicagoland area. \u201cWhy does a \u2018proactive,\u2019 \u2018diversity valuing\u2019 institution have a building named after a man who\u2019s [sic] only intentions were driven by greed & the side effect was genocide asked in the proposal. In an e-mail from Tenny that Dismantle shared on social media, Tenny writes that while she supports renaming the building, \u201cwe must do so in fashion that preserves our ability to realize the renaming as a fundraising opportunity.\u201d It was later announced that the building would be referred to as the \u201c280 building\u201d in the interim, named after its street address. 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 9/15 representative from the school confirmed this, writing in an e-mail that \u201cit\u2019s important to note that colleges, nonprofit organizations, and other institutions throughout the world understand the potential value to its community via scholarships and other funding availability.\u201d Then the response took a more personal turn saw in your bio you went to Northwestern \u2013 how many buildings/fields/parks/centers are named after benefactors? Probably any space or facility they could name for a donor where the funding can be used toward a student benefit. I\u2019m saying this not because have info to share about our naming plans don\u2019t \u2013 but because think it\u2019s important to consider in the context of the calls for a name change. If a college\u2019s options are to name a building or a space whatever they want vs. name it after a donor that could provide millions of dollars toward scholarships for those students most in need (thereby allowing scores of students to pursue higher education), why not consider this as an option?\u201d Camille Ariyana Billie, a third-year student in designed objects who is also a co-leader, doesn\u2019t understand why scholarships for Indigenous students, or hiring of more Indigenous faculty, has to be done through donor money get that it\u2019s symbolic, symbolism matters, especially in a large institution and everybody\u2019s watching. But it\u2019s like, if everybody\u2019s watching and they see that you\u2019re being blatantly anti- racist, shouldn\u2019t that be good?\u201d she asks. \u201cShouldn\u2019t you not think about money? Shouldn\u2019t you think about the hundreds of years of genocide and systematic oppression that the school does benefit from? They are sitting on the very land that was stolen.\u201d Berger has since reached out to Trujillo, asking to meet privately with her or NASA. \u201cI\u2019m very frustrated by the pressure that I\u2019m feeling to do that,\u201d Trujillo says. She\u2019s wary of the experience Dismantle had: months of emotionally exhausting meetings that ultimately led nowhere. Trujillo was one of just three students to join the anti-racism committee. Several people reported similar experiences: an apparent willingness of the president, provost, or other administrative figures to listen\u2014in private\u2014but then no action think they really rely on this idea that students will be up and out in two to four years, and so they really center individual appeasement as opposed to systemic change,\u201d Vinebaum says. \u201cObviously responding to students one-on-one is important but if there\u2019s not going to be systemic change, then you\u2019re going to keep bringing students in and traumatizing them, and faculty as well.\u201d Hayley Bain, from Blk @ SAIC, says upper administration will never outright disagree with you. \u201cIt\u2019s like, \u2018we hear you,\u2019 it\u2019s just a thing people say.\u201d Her Blk co-leader Alisa Drakes agrees. \u201cYou hear us but you\u2019re not actually listening.\u201d Black Futures spent weeks drafting a road map for how they feel the school should move forward in its anti- racism work: things that should happen now, within 30 days, 60 days, one year, and five years. It covers a broad swath of areas, from providing sick leave to contracted staff to arranging dedicated space on campus for 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 10/15 students to creating pathways for part-time faculty to advance into full-time, tenure-track positions. \u201cWe are extremely dismayed by the facts of what it has cost\u2014two years of staff, student and faculty labor, financial resources, and an international Black Lives Matter Movement\u2014to create this opening for racial justice at SAIC,\u201d they write. They also call for the resignation of all negligent parties involved in the Berger incident. In all there are 34 action items. The letter has over 300 signatories. Tenny and Berger initially offered a private meeting to discuss the concerns week later, they sent a more detailed response, offering immediate action on just three items. They then addressed \u201cassumptions that we believe aren\u2019t accurate or easily rectified.\u201d Black Futures responded just once, stating that the administrators\u2019 proposals were inadequate and embodied \u201cthe lack of sincere attention we are calling for.\u201d Vinebaum, who signed on to the Black Futures demands, thinks the administration\u2019s response shows a lack of cultural competency. \u201cThe letter from Black faculty reflects so much trauma and pain that school leadership doesn\u2019t seem to understand or want to try and understand, which is textbook white fragility,\u201d she says. \u201cIf one is going to be anti-racist genuinely then one should listen to the people that are aggrieved, and not think that they know better, and not be defensive. And it\u2019s really hard to do but that\u2019s essential. That\u2019s the work.\u201d Black Futures has been very public about their refusal to engage with the administration in an endless back- and-forth. \u201cThis doesn\u2019t have to be a conversation,\u201d says a member of the collective, who did not want to be named for fear of retaliation. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t have to be a conversation because here\u2019s a road map. This is our conversation, we started it, and there doesn\u2019t need to be any quibbling about what\u2019s happening because there\u2019s just things that need to happen. This quibbling even started without us responding, reacting, which is what happens when Black people say anything 99 percent of the time.\u201d avneet Talwar had just become the chair of the art therapy department in the summer of 2019, and was tasked with bringing her department in line with a new, more stringent accreditation process. As a result of the changes, which required more work and a revision of syllabi, two faculty resigned from the department. In late January 2020, Berger took the former chair Randy Vick to lunch to celebrate his retirement, where Vick reportedly expressed concern over the recent resignations. Berger inquired into how things were going in the department. Talwar later learned that Berger had asked faculty chair Beth Wright to do exit interviews with all the faculty who had left in the previous year, which included the spring before Talwar was chair. In the middle of this, the school went remote, and, for a time, Talwar thought the investigation would dissipate. But during a phone call with Wright in May, Talwar learned the investigation was completed, and that a report had been given to Berger. (Wright, who has since stepped down, did not respond to requests for comment.) Berger refused to give Talwar a copy of the report when she asked, but he agreed to a meeting. 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 11/15 Talwar invited Raja Halwani, her faculty liaison, to the meeting with Berger, which took place June 1. In the meeting, Talwar asked Berger what policy allows him to conduct such an investigation on a faculty member. He said that there wasn\u2019t any, and admitted that the investigation did not reveal any discrimination on Talwar\u2019s part said, \u2018So you were looking for that? Because if you were looking for that, nobody has interviewed me to know my side of the story,'\u201d Talwar says said to him, \u2018My department is the only department in this institution that is run by two faculty of color. What we consistently face everyday has never been the case for any of my predecessors, who were all white.'\u201d She says Berger responded by telling her she was \u201crough around the edges\u201d and in need of mentorship was just shocked,\u201d Talwar says. \u201cThis institution takes on an anti-racism stance and this is my interaction with my provost.\u201d Not trusting the Title process at the school, Talwar made a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The school refused an initial request for mediation. The next step is for to conduct an investigation. \u201cWhatever is in that document, whatever they did know is wrong. And they know that it is wrong as well,\u201d Talwar says. \u201cThe institution can keep making the commitments to anti-racism, but when it comes really down to actually having these conversations, nobody is interested. This performativeness has just become old for everyone.\u201d Cauleen Smith, a former visiting artist, had a similar experience. After a student complained about Smith\u2019s critique of her work, Smith says her one-year contract was prematurely terminated. \u201cIt wasn\u2019t that what said was objectionable or offensive or demeaning, she just didn\u2019t like it,\u201d Smith says. \u201cAnd the chair, instead of telling her, well that happens, told me that needed to apologize to the student refused.\u201d Smith then had a meeting with the chair of the film department and Paul Coffey, a vice provost and the current dean of community engagement. \u201cThe meeting started, literally with this individual, Paul Coffey, saying to me, \u2018Do you like working here or not?\u2019 That was his first question. \u2018Do you want to be a part of or not?'\u201d she says. From there, the conversation did not improve, and Smith did not teach any further classes. She says they presented her with a contract where she would instead complete research but she ignored it. Neither Coffey nor the film chair at the time responded to repeated requests for comment. \u201cThey routinely treat their faculty like they\u2019re lucky to have a job when in fact it\u2019s the opposite,\u201d she says. \u201cThe idea that a provost would begin a meeting by saying, \u2018Do you want to be here or not?\u2019 as if there\u2019s some sort of loyalty quotient that I\u2019m supposed to demonstrate, not by showing up to do my job but in other ways. It\u2019s really appalling. And it\u2019s definitely part of the culture.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 12/15 he frustration that campus members have expressed regarding the school\u2019s inadequate anti-racist actions are understandable, given that many have previously tried to dismantle the institution\u2019s structural racism. In 2009 created a strategic plan intended to build diversity, including several efforts to encourage diverse students to apply or transfer to the school. In 2013-14, the school established yet another committee \u201cto further diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.\u201d In 2016, a symposium was held on campus on decolonizing art education. Feedback was shared with Tenny and then-provost Craig Barton, and touched on many of the same issues being brought up today: participants cited the inherent white supremacism of the school, the way it appropriates student actions and labor, and a need for more diverse students and faculty. In a statement on their anti-racist efforts, a school representative wrote in an e-mail: \u201cWe\u2019re energized by the community\u2019s passion for this work and the progress that has been made. We know there is much more work to be done, and there may be missteps along the way, but as a higher education institution is committed to listening, learning, and growing.\u201d All the students spoke to could count on one hand the number of Black faculty they\u2019d had at the school. In the 2019-2020 academic year, 5.5 percent of faculty were Black, 8.9 percent were Asian, 8.1 percent were Hispanic/Latinx, and less than one percent were Indigenous, native Alaskan or Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander. White faculty made up 75 percent. In 2019, the most recent year for which data is available, 3.2 percent of students were African American, 7.6 percent Asian or Pacific Islander, 10.6 percent Hispanic, and less than one percent American Indian. The school\u2019s website notes that 30.8 percent were white, though only because it lumps all international students into their own category, where no race is specified former admissions staff person spoke to did note that both and Chicago students are targeted by the department, even though little work is done to offer those students meaningful support, either financially or institutionally. The employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of fear of retaliation, says that these potential students were viewed only as numbers. \u201cThe language that was used in that room by white employees was horrifying,\u201d the employee says. \u201cEverything was like, \u2018Oh we need more of the Latinos or the Blacks.'\u201d The school\u2019s retention rates illustrate the ramifications of objectifying students of color. The overall number of first-time freshmen who graduate within six years of starting their studies is 63 percent. For Hispanic/Latinx students, it\u2019s 46 percent, and for African American students, it\u2019s just 40 percent. \u201cYou\u2019re part of the institution, but you\u2019re also sort of not quite fully integrated,\u201d Blk @ SAIC\u2019s Hayley Bain says. \u201cYour concerns are never actually gonna be the main priority. Right now feel like the school is in a position where they\u2019re very much concerned with like, how do we look? Do we look like we\u2019re doing a good 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 13/15 job? Because doing a good job is difficult work and it takes a lot of difficult decisions, but it\u2019s pretty easy to send out e-mail.\u201d The sad truth is that, on paper at least, the diversity of SAIC\u2019s faculty and students is comparable to most of its peer institutions. According to data from the National Center for Education Statistics, in 2018, full-time faculty in degree-granting postsecondary institutions were 75 percent white, 12 percent Asian/Pacific Islander, and six percent each Black and Hispanic 2017 report from the New York Times found that the median family income of a student from was $104,600, which was actually lower than the average of Pratt or the Savannah College of Art and Design, two other private art schools with high rankings. Virtually no change in family income of students has occurred at over the past four decades. Walking the halls of SAIC, one feels that they\u2019re breathing rarified air. Common areas are clean and modern, with minimalist furniture. The library is stocked with Macs. Several buildings offer breathtaking views of Lake Michigan or the grand expanse of Millennium Park. Not to mention the faculty: MacArthur Fellow LaToya Ruby Frazier, former Whitney Biennial curator Michelle Grabner. Classes are small, with an average of 15-20 students in a studio class, and around 25 in academic classes. Like any college, and perhaps more so with art schools, the culture you experience is largely dictated by what department you\u2019re in. Several campus members reported the fibers department as being more inclusive, the fashion department as one that struggled with racism, as was designed objects and art history. Many cited the white supremacist framework of the school, with its white, western-centric curriculum, its focus on individual success and capitalism. With so much talk about diversity and inclusion on campuses reaching back decades, and so little improvement, it\u2019s no wonder that organizers are now demanding a much more radical approach. So many students spoke to while reporting this story were deeply frustrated by the school\u2019s complacency and refusal to adequately address their considerable grievances. Some felt betrayed that the school they were sold fell so short of its promise. When visiting colleges as a high school student, Billie, the co-leader who was raised on an Oneida reservation in Wisconsin, liked how prided itself on diversity and inclusion. But she\u2019s become disillusioned with the school\u2019s refusal to listen to Indigenous students. She\u2019s had professors who read the required land acknowledgement in class like it\u2019s a chore, like they don\u2019t understand the purpose feel like just want a basic college experience, but because I\u2019m Native and Black, I\u2019m low-key obligated to also fight this good fight,\u201d she says. \u201cBecause also had to do this in elementary, in middle school, in high school. It\u2019s just work on my work.\u201d While she says it\u2019s empowering to fight for change, as did many of the other students and faculty spoke to, that work takes a heavy toll, mentally and emotionally. Billie stresses that she\u2019s not asking for much. \u201cLike want a name change of a building want to be acknowledged that exist,\u201d she says wish when professors created their curriculums, that they would acknowledge that hey, there might be an Indigenous student in your class. I\u2019ve been in so many art history classes where they make it look like we\u2019re extinct or they only give like trauma porn. They don\u2019t speak on the resilience or the fact that we still made it, we\u2019re still here. We\u2019re still prospering.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 14/15 \u00a9 2025 Chicago Reader Powered by Newspack Editor\u2019s note: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Lynika Strozier was a part-time employee without health insurance. She was a full-time employee. After publication responded to the Reader\u2018s original inquiry into Strozier\u2019s employment status. The article also incorrectly stated that all but one person in President Tenny\u2019s 18-member cabinet are white. There are two non-white people in the cabinet. And the article incorrectly identified Beth Wright as the former dean of faculty. She is the former chair of faculty. We have updated the reference in the article to the Change.org petition calling for Berger\u2019s resignation spokesperson for stated that \u201coutside of the instance of reading a quote that is described in the story, he has not said the word.\u201d v 2/22/25, 10:07 Inside the fight for racial equity at - Chicago Reader 15/15", "8325_102.pdf": "It\u2019s a Brand New Dean An Interview with Martin Berger. By Grace Wells September 5, 2018 Featured \u0000\ue84e \ue840 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 1/6 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 2/6 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 3/6 Martin Berger, new Dean of Faculty, on the 14th Floor of the MacLean Building | Photography by Luca Donaldso Students and faculty were first introduced to Martin Berger, the School of the Art Institute of Chicago\u2019s (SAIC) ne Dean of Faculty, at a panel he hosted in February wondered then whether Berger\u2019s background at a large pub university would fit a small private art school. After meeting with Berger in his new office, days after his start at the school, his direct approach to addressing student and faculty concerns was refreshing and it became apparent that his creativity is not compromised by his practicality. Hired by following the resignation of Lisa Wainwright as Dean of Faculty, Berger took on the role on Augus 1 former Associate Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Professor of History of Art and Visual Culture at the University of California Santa Cruz, Berger is wholly new to \u2014 a far cry from Wainwright\u2019s 21 years at the school lot of the staff, and a lot of the administrators, are people who\u2019ve come up through the ranks and hav been here a long time,\u201d remarked Berger. \u201cThat\u2019s a huge plus because they understand the institution, but ther also something good that comes from bringing in people from the outside. They were looking for somebody to come with that fresh set of eyes.\u201d Reconciling his practice with his role Author of a number of books and academic papers, Berger focuses on the construct of whiteness in 19th- and 20th-century art. What he has learned from his research appears intrinsic to his goals as an administrator Newsmagazine: How do you plan to bring your body of work on race and gender to your new role? Martin Berger want to ensure that everything we\u2019re doing is as equitable as possible and that we don\u2019t have invisible biases creeping into our process. Whether it\u2019s paying faculty to make sure we don\u2019t have gender or rac bias that gives people who are white, male, or straight higher salaries; protecting students so they\u2019re free to get the education they\u2019re paying for and certainly deserve; or whether it\u2019s just in diversifying our faculty. F: You write in one paper about a single artwork or entity as not exempt from its era\u2019s politics. How would you apply that same thinking to an institution like SAIC? MB: This place isn\u2019t about race, but a certain white value system has a lot to do with the 19th-century School of the Art Institute that was founded. There are ways in which some of that lingers think some of our efforts nee to counteract the way in which the institution has built itself over a long period of time don\u2019t at all want to suggest that this place is more racist or less than any other institution, but every institution in America is fashioned by certain cultural values. Faculty life 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 4/6 Conversations about part-time faculty treatment at universities have been abundant as of late. Citing low pay a lack of job security and benefits, part-time faculty members at institutions across the country have been holdin strikes and making efforts to unionize. F: Are there any plans to improve part-time faculty life at think we\u2019d like to have more part-time faculty transition to full-time. We\u2019ve made considerable efforts to improve part-time faculty salaries, but there\u2019s probably still more we can do, and right now we\u2019re having conversations about how we can integrate part-time faculty more into the life of the school. F: What about faculty unions? MB: From time to time at any institution that doesn\u2019t have unions, there will be conversations about whether it\u2019 in part-timers\u2019 best interests. Ultimately, that\u2019s something the part-timers will decide. Student-faculty relationships former student has filed a lawsuit alleging repeated subjection to \u201cextreme sex abuse\u201d by former paintin professor John Phillips. SAIC\u2019s student-faculty relationships policies currently ban relationships between studen and their direct advisors while simply cautioning against all other student-faculty relationships. F: Is there a plan to address or improve the current policy on student-faculty relationships certainly would be open to looking at it think the policy we have now is a good one but there might be ways in which it can be tweaked to provide greater protections to students. At an art school you form close working relationships with faculty in ways that don\u2019t happen when you\u2019re taking large class. The majority of our students are adults in a technical sense, but a faculty member, even one who\u2019s n supervising a student, has so much more institutional power than the students that a disparity still exists. I\u2019m committed to ensuring we have an open school where we can form strong relationships between faculty and students, but also one that\u2019s safe and protects students\u2019 rights. Student life The Dean of Faculty is a more far-removed administrator from the minds of students than, say, the Dean of Students. But Berger has repeatedly emphasized his desire to work in two major student-centric areas, both seemingly outside the realm of a Dean of Faculty: debt and workplace-readiness appreciated that you spoke a lot about preparing students for the workplace in your faculty panel in Februa Could you speak a little bit more to that? MB: Traditionally a lot of schools have the attitude to provide students with a good education, however that\u2019s defined, but increasingly \u2014 because we\u2019ve had a rough patch in the job market after 2008 \u2014 they are waking u to the fact that our responsibility to students is broader than that. Absolutely we have to give them the skills to succeed in the area they came to study in. But we have to make sure they have transferable skills, and think it 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 5/6 an important part of the school\u2019s mission to produce students and graduates who are good citizens too, for wh they need critical thinking skills. It\u2019s a more expansive notion of what an education should be about. F: How do you plan to do that think we need to pay attention to liberal studies also think we should be talking to students about what they\u2019re going to do after school much earlier than we currently do. F: Do you have any plans to address student debt? MB: There won\u2019t be a single way of solving that problem; it\u2019d be a lot of little steps we take. It might be freezing tuition or finding efficiencies in the school; it might be improving fundraising so we have more money to dedica to financial aid or reducing the credit hours required for an undergraduate degree. It\u2019ll be a basket of things we do, rather than just one thing. Berger hasn\u2019t seen the start of a semester at yet. When asked whether he\u2019ll teach while he\u2019s here, Berger expressed interest: \u201cMy ideal is to regularly teach a freshman introductory course because I\u2019d like to have conta with first-year students as they\u2019re coming in.\u201d This desire to work with new students, and the care with which he proclaimed it, embodies the genuine interest in working for the good of the school sensed from Berger. Let\u2019s hope it morphs into action over the coming months. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. 2/22/25, 10:07 It\u2019s a Brand New Dean Newsmagazine 6/6", "8325_103.pdf": "Solidarity Student Letter by Solidarity July 7, 2020 \u00b7 Archives, Artists, Essays + Reviews, Featured An excerpt of the letter written by Nadia Frierson, Toni Ivory, and Nicholas Zepeda, a Black and Latinx student-artist-trio, who are \u201cstanding in solidarity to dismantle implicit and overt racism rooted within the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.\u201d Below is a portion of one of the letters published by students, faculty, and staff of the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (SAIC): the Black Faculty, Alumni, and Community Supporters Letter; the Solidarity Staff Letter; and the Solidarity Student Letter. What you\u2019ll read below is the Solidarity Student Letter, which was started by Nadia Frierson, Toni Ivory, and Nicholas Zepeda, a Black and Latinx student-artist-trio, who are \u201cstanding in solidarity to dismantle implicit and overt racism rooted within the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.\u201d They started with a 13-page letter to 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 1/8 their school\u2019s president, Elissa Tenny, calling out performative \u201canti-racist\u201d initiatives\u2013a letter that has sparked campus-wide attention. Their efforts have brought an overwhelming amount of support via the Instagram account @dismantle_saic, which has become a space for communities to voice support, present demands, and ask questions. Using their inside experience from working in the school\u2019s admissions department, the student trio are pushing for accountability and transparency from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago regarding residual layers of institutional white supremacy. All of these letters are in conversation with and building upon one another, so we ask that you take some time to read each one and sign your name in support if you\u2019re moved to do so. Sixty Inches From Center is a platform co-run by and for Chicago and Midwest artists, curators, cultural workers, and advocates, including those who work at and attend SAIC. We are committed to interrogating exclusive art historical canons and uplifting neglected perspectives in spaces of knowledge-creation because doing so is an essential step toward creating more inclusive future canons\u2013ones that have Black, Indigenous, and Latinx artists, and artists of color at their core. Therefore, we support these letters as actions that get us closer to the kind of cultural landscape that isn\u2019t just a figment of our dreams, but is an adjacent reality that we create for and with our communities each and every day. In the words of the organizers, \u201cWe need to put the force of our community\u2019s creativity and innovation behind actively dismantling the systems of oppression within our own institution. The pattern of empty platitudes and gestures is no longer acceptable \u2014 we need to act now.\u201d Image created by Hanna Field. To: Elissa Tenny, President of School of the Art Institute of Chicago Rose Milkowski, Vice President of Enrollment Management Jefferson Pinder, Interim Dean of Faculty and Vice President of Academic Affairs Additional School of the Art Institute of Chicago Leadership From: \u200b Nadia Frierson, Admissions Student Ambassador Coordinator, B.F.A. 2020 Fiber & Material Studies \u200bNicholas Zepeda, Admissions Student Ambassador Coordinator, B.F.A. 2021 Painting & Drawing and Chicago Scholar \u200bToni Ivory, Admissions Student Ambassador, B.F.A. 2023 Painting & Drawing, Interdisciplinary Studies For immediate action, we request: Establish and schedule a series of meetings with Elissa Tenny President), Rose Milkowski (\u200bVice President of Enrollment Management)\u200b, and Jefferson Pinder (Interim Dean of Faculty and Vice President of Academic Affairs) with Student and Counselor delegates.. Meeting details should be 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 2/8 agreed upon by July 1st, with a meeting no later than July 10th with additional results-based meetings on a consistent schedule. Student delegates: Nadia Frierson, Nicholas Zepeda, and Toni Ivory Counselor delegates: Jackson Moore, Kate Perryman, and Sheika COMPROMISED. These concerns are in response to the following growing collection of over 165 statements collected anonymously regarding individuals\u2019experiences with via google forms. The attached email chain regarding the announcement and passing of Art and Technology StudiesProfessor Lynika Strozier. This correspondence, as seen on \u200bpage 14\u200b, is between students and Christopher Baker (\u200bDepartment Chair/Professor of Art and Technology studies\u200b), and includes Felice Dublon (\u200bVice President and Dean of Student Affairs\u200b). It was also sent to the newly appointed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Director for Academic Affairs: Jefferson Pinder. The apology from Elissa Tenny sent on June 28th, 2020 that both acknowledges errors in the announcement of her death the presence of systemic racism at SAIC: \u201c\u200bGiven Lynika\u2019s passing from complications due to COVID-19, and knowing that the virus disproportionately affects people of color like Lynika, a Black woman, the inconsistent distribution of the message has raised further concerns. Our feelings of grief over the impact of this terrible pandemic and anger that systemic racism make some of us more vulnerable are real, and those feelings were exacerbated by the poor handling of the message. The messaging error was unintentional, and am sorry.\u200b\u201d, but doesn\u2019t announce an investigation into those \u201cinconsistencies.\u201d \u201c\u200bArt Institute of Chicago\u200b staff are demanding increased transparency, accountability, and racial equity from museum leadership, citing concerning decision-making in regard to a new round of institution-wide layoffs and preparations to reopen in late July. An open letter signed by 186 employees\u2014nearly 30 percent of the museum\u2019s staff\u2014urges that decisions during \u201cthis chaotic moment\u201d not be made as they currently are, by a \u201cvery small group of the most highly paid staff in the museum with privileged identities.\u201d The letter, which was obtained by \u200bARTnews, was sent last Friday to seven policy heads, including president James Rondeau, deputy director for curatorial affairs Sarah Guernsey, and vice president of museum development Eve Jeffers. \u200b Several of those who signed the letter, which also offers alternatives to layoffs, have since been laid off.\u200b\u201d published via ArtNews on June 27th, 2020. 1202692804/ The following article published by \u200bFNews Magazine\u200b on March 10th, 2020 outlining the events and institutional correspondence surrounding Martin Berger\u2019s use of a racial slur during an presentation. It includes interviews conducted with students, staff, and faculty that express concerns regarding the relationship between confidentiality and accountability involved in 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 3/8 multiple stages of Berger\u2019s promotion: detailing the institution\u2019s public and administrative response. The article shows how this situation continues to inspire a collective distrust in as an institution. Interviews from the linked \u200bFNews Magazine\u200b article detailing the growing feelings of \u201cdisappoint[ment] by the lack of accountability\u201d which came from students, faculty, and staff that followed the open forum which occurred on October 22nd, 2019 (\u200b13 months after the delivery of the letter)\u200b . Additionally, it states that sought a third-party moderator despite the letter\u2019s request for moderation and negotiation of event planning from the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for said forum. The letter included signatures from 55 individuals. The Letter: m?edit_requested=true&fbzx=2767069301105330203 The student-organized petition released on June 13th, 2020 that calls for the resignation of Martin Berger for his use of a racial slur during an presentation which currently has signatures from 1,537 individuals. The Petition: demand-the-re signation-of-saic-s-martin-berger-after-use-of-the-n-word The apology emailed to all students on June 26th, 2020 from Martin Berger that addresses the petition, open forum, and his use of the racial slur during an presentation and concludes with a commitment to \u201censure funding and implementation of the structural changes that emerge from their [\u200bJefferson Pinder and his presidential antiracist advisory committee\u200b] work\u201d. Berger does not explicitly acknowledge the confidentiality surrounding his promotion or prompt an investigation into the individuals involved. Our interpreted escalation of concerns from student government that Berger and his team are not satisfying the demands of the student-body are the result of the discussed quality of their past meetings as described by Berger\u2019s statement: \u200ba\u200b \u200bfrank conversation in which they articulated frustration with my and the School\u2019s lack of response to the petition and its underlying concerns\u201d\u200b) be created and released. The petition has continued to gain signatures case including Former student [redacted] V. former faculty John Phillips, former Dean of Faculty Lisa Wainwright, Former Director of Student Conflict Resolution Amanda Dasilva, current Vice President for Human Resources/Chief Human Resources Officer/Diversity Advisory Group Member Michael Nicolai, current Chair of Faculty Beth Wright, and The School of the Art Institute of Chicago was filed on 06/18/18. \u2013 The following statement is included in the case: \u201cWhen [redacted] was a student at in 2015-2016, she was repeatedly subjectedto extreme sex discrimination, harassment, sexual violence, retaliation, and other forms of emotional and physical abuse and injury by John Phillips, a member of the faculty at and [redacted]\u2019s direct advisor. Before he was 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 4/8 appointed as [redacted]\u2019s advisor, Phillips had previously sexually victimized other students at officials knew of Phillips\u2019 past actions, and were aware that [redacted] was receiving services from as a student with disabilities\u201d. The Chicago Sun-Times article states: \u201cThe school fired Phillips in August 2016.\u201d Chicago Sun-Times article: cher-over-extreme-sex-discrimination Case files: et- al/COMPLAINT-filed-by-Jane-Doe-Jury-Demand-Filing-fee-400-receipt-number-0752-14 601482/ilnd-1:2018-cv-04240-00001 Lisa Wainwright resigned as Dean of Faculty and is currently employed as a Professor in the Department of Art History, Theory and Criticism to teach the following courses in the Fall 2020 semester: 1 4155 \u2013 Pop Art and It\u2019s Legacy 2 5002 \u2013 Graduate Survey of Modern and Contemporary Art. The\u200b FNews Magazine\u200b article published September 5th, 2018 where Martin Berger is interviewed afterfilling Wainwright\u2019s former position as Dean of Faculty, and is asked if there is a \u201cplan to address or improve the current policy of student-faculty relationships.\u201d He responds with certainly would be open to looking at it.\u201d The institutional response and content of these correspondences lead us to believe that is \u200b neglecting and failing\u200b to enforce its policies of transparency and accountability across the institution. In addition to the investigation of involved staff should investigate those who engage with policies of sharing the deaths of members of the community to avoid and punish curatorial practices institution-wide. The full letter includes a list of over 15 key recommendations, initiatives and demands. Read the full letter here 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 5/8 The Willing Selective Hindsight of Islamicate History by Saadia Yasmin Pervaiz perspective on the silencing of intra-faith nuances through the depiction of the Prophet and the narrowing of Islamic history. February 27, 2023 \u00b7 Community, Essays + Reviews Everything And More: On the Makings of Bunny McKensie Mack by Tempestt Hazel Bunny McKensie Mack discusses growing up in Chicago and becoming a trilingual facilitator, educator, activist, researcher, artist, and founder of the EARTH. May 18, 2022 \u00b7 Community, Interviews 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 6/8 Open Sheds Used for What?: An interview with Cecilia & Marina Resende Santos by Christina Nafziger Open Sheds Used for What? conjures more questions than answers, which is precisely where its magic comes from \u2014that, and its devotion in spirit and design to collaboration, community, and experimentation.\u2026 November 13, 2020 \u00b7 Featured, Happenings, Interviews 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 7/8 Copyright \u00a9 2024 Sixty Inches From Center. Privacy Policy 2/22/25, 10:07 Solidarity Student Letter - Sixty Inches From Center 8/8"} |
8,452 | Jay Levi | Carleton College | [
"8452_101.pdf",
"8452_102.pdf",
"8452_103.pdf"
] | {"8452_101.pdf": "Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the Sexual assault threatens women across the globe. While some countries are more dangerous than others, harmful cultural norms, censorship and cover-ups also occur in more progressive countries like the recent case filed by an Indian student against an elite college points to the often elusive realities of sexual misconduct in institutions and the risks women face across cultures and countries The concept of stopping violence against women andand human trafficking, Stop sexual harassment and rape, International Women\u2019s Day \u00a9 Tinnakorn jorruang / shutterstock.com 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 1/12 In the fall of 2019, a young student from India left her home country to pursue a bachelor\u2019s degree in the United States. She began her education at Carleton College, a highly ranked private liberal arts school in Minnesota. This past June, the student \u2014 adopting the pseudonym Jane Doe \u2014 filed a case against the college, stating she was groomed and assaulted by a Carleton College administrator and alumnus named Don Smith. She argued the college not only enabled the abuse but treated the misconduct with deliberate indifference. An examination of the realities of sexual abuse in India and the demonstrates that even on college campuses, female safety is often an illusion. Jane\u2019s home country of India is known as one of the most dangerous countries for women. Sexual violence is so pervasive that some consider it the norm. Many girls grow up expecting to experience sexual harassment or assault at some point in their lives. In early August, the rape and murder of a female doctor in training on her college campus in Kolkata added to India\u2019s troubling record of horrific sexual violence against women. The brutal attack sparked massive protests and strikes across the country after she was found dead on the podium of a seminar hall with injuries that suggested torture. Months later, the government is still responding to the crime and its repercussions as women demand justice and legal reform. Sexual assault across countries and cultures 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 2/12 The Kolkata incident represents just one of the thousands of cases documented each year, with a rape reported every 15 minutes. Women in rural communities or those in lower castes, particularly the Dalits, are particularly vulnerable to sexual abuse. Dalits are known as impure \u201cuntouchables\u201d in India, often working as street sweepers and latrine cleaners. They are sometimes manipulated into forced labor or prostitution. Seen as lesser than others, Dalit women who face abuse are often dismissed, silenced or are subjected to victim-blaming. This is despite overwhelming evidence of abuse \u2014 with one study finding that over 83% of Dalit women face sexual harassment or assault in their lifetime. Upper-caste men often target lower-caste women who are less likely to report them. They leverage their social standing and associated privilege to manipulate or cover up the case. This pattern is mirrored in the US, where men in positions of power target women who are lower on the socioeconomic ladder because they believe they will not be caught (i.e., men like Harvey Weinstein). In India, cultural censorship of women, combined with inefficient government support, discourages them from reporting assaults and seeking help. Outdated practices, such as the two-finger test, which some doctors still use to verify if a woman was penetrated, are just one of many ways women are humiliated in the aftermath of an assault. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 3/12 India\u2019s patriarchal culture and gender roles run deep, especially in communities with inadequate access to education and opportunities for development. Even if women stand up to violations of their human rights, they often face shame and ostracization, leading many to avoid coming forward. Some studies estimate that as many as 99% of rapes go unreported in India. In the US, an estimated 63% of sexual assaults go unreported. The majority of data surrounding sexual abuse in India focuses primarily on rape, with studies on sexual harassment and other types of sexual assault (nonconsensual kissing, groping, touching etc.) receiving far less attention. Public outrage has led to legislative reforms and increased institutional support for women in recent years. However, sexual assault remains commonplace in India, even for women from more privileged backgrounds, like Jane Doe. Sexual misconduct in places that are meant to be safe for women, such as work, school or religious institutions, is not unique to countries with a poor track record on these issues. Women also face such threats in American institutions that continuously fail to respond effectively and transparently to cases of sexual misconduct. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 4/12 While a family in Kolkata sought justice for their daughter in light of her rape and murder, Jane began her own pursuit of justice in a small college town in Minnesota. In 2019, Jane left her family behind in Delhi and began her studies at Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota. She planned to study computer science at the elite institution. Carleton mandates its academically gifted students to leaven tough coursework with required P.E. classes in their early years on campus. Jane selected a Salsa dance taught by Smith, a Carleton graduate and high- ranking administrator whom the college claimed was an award-winning Salsa dancer. According to a complaint filed with the District Court in Minnesota (Doe v. Carleton College, 2024), Smith groomed and assaulted Jane over the years in an escalating pattern of abuse. The complaint states that Smith hired Jane as his co-instructor, requiring her to rehearse with him on campus and at his home nearby. Jane alleges Smith forcibly massaged her against her will, spanked her, forcibly kissed her, bit her and assaulted her multiple times during rehearsals at his house and on campus. The assaults could be brutal and allegedly included beatings, choking and drugging. Violence towards students in the 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 5/12 According to the college, Jane told a Carleton dean in early February 2022 that she had been attacked at the home of a faculty member, and that she needed extra time to complete assignments due to the trauma caused by those attacks. The dean refused to assist, however, and essentially told Jane to work harder. Discouraged by Carleton\u2019s inaction and Smith\u2019s claim that his administration ties would protect him against her allegations, Jane endured escalating abuse until she presented Carleton with Smith\u2019s written confession and photos of her injuries. Carleton quietly terminated Smith after some time, and the college\u2019s Title coordinator told Jane to keep quiet about the incident. Like many victims of campus sexual assault, Jane\u2019s academic performance suffered. Rather than assist Jane, Carleton placed her on academic review and at threat of suspension for missing a test while she was being assaulted by Smith. Jane said she felt \u201ceven more trapped\u201d and that \u201cshe struggled to cope with the emotional distress caused by the instructor and the institution.\u201d Despite her hardships, she met Carleton\u2019s academic standards but continued to be harassed by the school. Jane\u2019s complaint alleges that Carleton failed to adequately supervise the instructor\u2019s behavior and that the school was deliberately indifferent to the misconduct. It further states that the Title Coordinator failed to investigate the situation, allegedly violating Carleton\u2019s Title policies and procedures, as well as federal law. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 6/12 Jane is now suing Carleton for five counts per the First Amended Complaint: Vicarious Liability for Assault and Battery, Vicarious Liability for Sexual Abuse, Negligent Retention, Negligent Supervision and Vicarious Liability for Negligence. In response, Carleton has called Smith a \u201cpredator\u201d and said it regrets Jane\u2019s experience at Carleton, but that Carleton has no legal liability for the sexual assault committed by its administrator. On August 19, two months after the initial filing, Carleton filed a motion to dismiss the case. The school claims \u2014 in direct contradiction to federal law \u2014 that it has no responsibility to investigate sexual misconduct. The motion was subsequently withdrawn after Jane amended her complaint. Despite cultivating a DEI-friendly institutional facade that includes a full- time dedicated Indigenous Community Liaison on a small campus with a negligible indigenous population, Carleton College has a sordid history of turning a blind eye to campus sexual assault group of Carleton alumni, frustrated with the college\u2019s attempts to whitewash its past, started a website dedicated to collecting survivor stories starting from the 1960s and documenting the numerous lawsuits Carleton has faced, including a seminal 1991 lawsuit that helped establish national standards for responding to complaints made under Title IX. Carleton has already responded to some of the allegations in Jane\u2019s lawsuit by firing at least one of the administrators involved and appointing their lawyer\u2019s employee as Carleton\u2019s Title coordinator. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 7/12 Maxwell Pope graduated from Carleton in 2020 with a major in Dance and Psychology. During his time at the college, a male professor, Jay Levi, was accused of sexual misconduct. One student alleged the professor groped her inner thigh multiple times and pressed his body into her while they were in a dark room together. Levi was also Smith\u2019s academic advisor during his time at Carleton. According to Carleton\u2019s student paper, The Carletonian, this was just one of at least nine Title claims brought against the professor. Title IX, part of the Education Amendments of 1972, prohibits gender-based discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funding. After students reported the professor\u2019s inappropriate sexual behavior, he took a \u201csabbatical.\u201d He returned to campus in 2018. In 2019, a piece in the Carletonian claimed the Title investigation was \u201cadjudicated with an opaque set of sanctions.\u201d In a subsequent piece, a student writer expressed shock and anger in response to the misconduct and urged Carlton faculty to \u201credesign\u201d the sexual misconduct complaint process. Discussing his time at the college, Pope said, \u201cIt was definitely a situation with [Levi] where it felt more like students looking out for students, or students informing students.\u201d He stated don\u2019t remember a time where the college was initiating those conversations \u2014 it was definitely a keep-it- quiet situation dark history of sexual misconduct 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 8/12 According to Pope, \u201ctransparency would have felt better\u201d in situations of sexual misconduct on campus, a sentiment that is echoed by students across the country in light of cover-ups and institutional censorship. In recent years, a plethora of elite schools, such as Harvard and Stanford, have been accused of mishandling sexual misconduct. Inadequate responses from administration officials angered students. Given this poor track record, future students fear what will happen if they are assaulted. Women are at serious risk of sexual abuse in institutions of higher education. Many institutions refuse to take accountability for enabling continued abuse. One in five women is sexually assaulted during their time in college. Two-thirds of college students are sexually harassed. Yet according to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC), in 2014, 40% of colleges stated they had not investigated a single sexual assault case in the previous five years. Compare this data to the number of reported sexual misconduct cases on college campuses, and the fact that two-thirds of assaults in the go unreported. The numbers don\u2019t add up. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 9/12 The frequency and perception of assaults vary from country to country closer look at how universities in the respond to accusations of sexual misconduct shows that women are often hurt by a lack of transparency. Jane left a country where both data and attitudes indicate she would have been exposed to sexual misconduct at home, only to encounter it upon arrival in the US. In India, women face sexual misconduct in schools, hospitals, workplaces, public transportation and at home. Women are raised to be aware of the high likelihood of harassment, abuse and, in the worst-case scenario, rape. They intimately understand the hardship of speaking out in a country where bureaucratic processes, cultural shame, the caste system and gender roles often form insurmountable obstacles for women seeking justice. Despite cover-ups and pay-offs, cases from the Kolkata incident in August to the Nirbhaya gang rape of 2012 \u2013 which led to the creation of the death penalty for rape in India \u2014 galvanized the public and advanced the fight for greater accountability, justice and legislative reform. In the US, there is greater overall gender equality, better access to medical resources and mental health support, and a longer history of both legislative and institutionalized systemic support for survivors. Justice from India to the 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 10/12 In recent years, there have been significant but insufficient cultural shifts toward believing in and standing up for women. Many women are now taught not only how to stand up for themselves, but also that they can stand up for themselves. Yet beneath the sparkling facades of institutions, industries and college campuses, there are people like Harvey Weinstein, Larry Nassar and Roger Ailes. There are cover-ups, pay-offs and the slow but sure suffocation of victims by bureaucracy. And then, silence, until women like Jane come forward. Hailing from the \u201crape capital of the world,\u201d Jane arrived at an illustrious college campus in the prairies of Minnesota to pursue an education. She describes her college years as polluted by grooming, harassment and assault that severely damaged her physical, mental and emotional well- being. This story, one of many, forces us to face disheartening truths and uncomfortable realities. Many parents quake at the thought of sending their daughter to India when she is young, vulnerable and alone. Consider a family in Delhi or a rural village in Bihar and their excitement at the opportunity for their daughter to attend an elite college. Imagine them finding out she was abused, manipulated, assaulted and coerced by an educator in a position of power at an institution they believed was safe for their daughter. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 11/12 Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont 94002 It is time we address the reality of sexual abuse in the US, especially in the education system. The lack of transparency and accountability is catastrophic. It hinders both current and future students like Jane from making informed decisions about their educational environment and the associated risks of sexual harassment and assault. Before pointing fingers at countries like India, we should be honest with ourselves, our communities and our students about the reality of sexual misconduct in our own nation. We must make tangible changes and consider victims in both how we prevent abuse and how we obtain justice. [Joey T. McFadden and Lee Thompson-Kolar edited this piece.] The views expressed in this article are the author\u2019s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer\u2019s editorial policy. 2/22/25, 10:08 Illusions of Safety: Sexual Assault from India to the 12/12", "8452_102.pdf": "The Carletonian \u2022 January 16, 2020 \u2022 you-want-the-faculty-and-staff-sexual-misconduct-complaint-process-to-work/ Carleton, is this how you want the faculty and staff sexual misconduct complaint process to work? Sarah Newsham When read this fall\u2019s Carletonian article in which a former student describes her experiences with professor Jay/Jerome Levi (\u201cApplegate \u201917 comes forward about Levi incident,\u201d October 11, 2019), I, like many others, was shocked and angered. While the appallingly large number of Title cases brought against Levi had been reported on previously, this article was newly troubling due to its explicit description of the misconduct in contrast to (what seems to me) relatively lenient sanctions. Another detail that jumped out at me was the fact that a single administrator is responsible for adjudicating sexual misconduct cases against faculty or staff members. In my opinion, the way Carleton handles sexual misconduct cases involving faculty and staff is flawed do not know all the details of the Jay Levi case trust that Dean of the College Beverly Nagel, adjudicator in this case, had to weigh many factors and made what was surely a difficult decision. Right now, I\u2019m not raising issue with this particular case or the administrators responsible for making these decisions. Rather, I\u2019m concerned by the fact that in each sexual misconduct case, the outcome is decided by a single individual (Dean Nagel if the complaint is against a faculty member, Vice President and Treasurer Fred Rogers if the complaint is against a staff member). As understand it, Carleton faculty voted to approve this process and have the power to change it am urging you to consider doing so now. Some background: When a student makes a report against another student and decides to go through the formal resolution process, the case is brought before a three-person subset of the Community Board on Sexual Misconduct (CBSM), which consists of one staff member, one faculty member and one student. The larger twelve-person board is composed of faculty, staff, and students who meet four to five times per term for ongoing trainings such as mock hearings, debriefs of recent cases, and discussions of bias and consent\u2014all in addition to a longer, yearly training. The is facilitated by the College\u2019s full-time Title coordinator. The three individuals on the panel are responsible for determining whether or not a student violated Carleton policy and for determining subsequent sanctions. Either person (the one bringing the complaint or the one responding to it) has the option to appeal the board\u2019s decision to the Dean of Students. In formal cases brought against faculty or staff members, the case is decided solely by the Dean of the College or the Vice President and Treasurer, who may consult with others as they see fit or appoint a designee to hear the case in their place. The person bringing the complaint forward cannot appeal the decision under any circumstances (which was the subject of a widely- circulated 2017 petition). The College Council, which is composed of five faculty members, five students, two staff members, three senior administrative officers and the President periodically revises and approves this disciplinary policy. The procedures were most recently approved in May 2015. The reason we have this resolution process is because it reflects the decisions faculty have a large voice in, and they have some power to change it understand that having only one administrator make the decision\u2014as opposed to a faculty committee, for example\u2014is efficient, requires fewer people to be trained, and avoids the potentially messy dynamic of peers disciplining one another also understand that protections such as tenure, no peer involvement in the disciplinary process, and the lack of an appeal process help ensure that Title complaints are not used as a tool to curtail faculty members\u2019 academic freedom. However also know that faculty members care deeply about the safety and wellbeing of their students and of the Carleton community as a whole. As understand it, under the current system, the only time that any faculty members have any say in a faculty disciplinary issue is if the adjudicator (Dean of the College or the person they designate) recommends suspension or dismissal. In that case, the Faculty Judiciary Committee would be convened to decide if the violation was serious enough to warrant that sanction. Even if 100 percent of the faculty (not to mention students and staff) thought that a faculty member deserved to be suspended or dismissed because of a Title violation, but the administrator in charge decided on a more lenient sanction, the faculty would have no institutional power to contest the adjudicator\u2019s decision. No outlet for faculty input, and no appeal. Any person or group of people making a decision in a Title case must evaluate many factors (protecting the college from lawsuits, protecting the career of the faculty or staff member, protecting the person making the complaint, protecting other students, etc.). This is an inherently subjective process. My concern is that in these difficult, subjective situations, the only person whose judgment has power is a single, high-level administrator believe this process would be improved by including additional individuals with other priorities and perspectives, such as faculty, staff, students, or the full-time Title coordinator. While right now am not advocating for a particular decision- making process want us to recognize that our current process is not the only option and to think critically as a community about how we make these decisions. Faculty: It is important that you have the power to prevent another faculty member from being punished too harshly (e.g. losing tenure or getting fired), and therefore you have a committee that must approve these severe sanctions. Is it not also important that you have the power to do the reverse: to prevent a faculty member from being let off too easily, which could lead to further harm to Carleton community members? What if someday in the future we have a Dean or Vice President and Treasurer who consistently makes judgements that you think are too lenient, leading to an unsafe learning and teaching environment. In that scenario, wouldn\u2019t you want to change the disciplinary process? If the answer is yes, then why can\u2019t we improve the process now, before we reach that point? If we were starting from scratch, is this the sexual misconduct complaint process you would advocate for? If so can respect that, and would appreciate it if you would help me to understand why. If it\u2019s not the exact process you would choose, then let\u2019s consider replacing it with something better won\u2019t pretend to have a perfectly thought-out system ready for you. However, based on some cursory research, some peer institutions incorporate an appeals process and/or faculty member panels in faculty and staff sexual misconduct cases. You, the Carleton faculty, have the power to redesign this process, and am urging you to do so. The rest of the Carleton community is invested in this issue too. Students have done a commendable job responding to the Jay Levi cases by advocating for harsher sanctions and by educating incoming classes about the topic. Staff, parents, and alumni have also been powerful voices in this fight. And ultimately, the responsibility to ensure a safe campus and just disciplinary processes rests with the Board of Trustees am by no means an expert on this topic, and am sure there are complexities and nuances to this issue that am missing. Faculty, staff, students, trustees, alumni: how do you think Carleton should handle sexual misconduct complaints against faculty and staff am willing to be persuaded that our current system is the best one out there, but right now am unconvinced.", "8452_103.pdf": "The Carletonian \u2022 September 28, 2019 \u2022 College finds Prof. Levi guilty of sexually inappropriate conduct Natalie Sainz Professor of Anthropology Jay Levi has been barred from teaching fall term following an investigation into a formal Title complaint, brought in May 2019 under Carleton\u2019s Sexual Misconduct Policy. Following the investigation, Levi was found to have engaged in \u201csexually inappropriate conduct\u201d with a student. He is expected to return and teach in Winter Term 2020. Levi was found guilty of sexually inappropriate conduct, which is distinguished from sexual harassment in the Carleton Sexual Misconduct Policy. The policy defines \u201csexually inappropriate conduct\u201d as \u201cunwelcome sexual conduct that may not rise to the level of sexual harassment. Conduct that may be considered sexually inappropriate may be isolated behavior not sufficiently serious to be sexual harass\u00adment under this policy. Sexually inappropriate conduct may include, but is not limited to, crude, obscene, or sexually offensive gestures or behavior, or unwelcome sexual comments or communication. For purposes of this definition, communication may be oral, written, or electronically transmitted.\u201d The specifics of Levi\u2019s charge will be investigated further in future Carletonian reporting. In an official statement from Carleton to the Carletonian, Dean of the College Beverly Nagel said that the formal investigation \u201crelates to an incident that occurred during the 2016-2017 academic year,\u201d and was formally reported in Spring of 2019. Nagel explained that this statement would not be publicly distributed, but would be provided upon inquiry. Nagel also noted that outcomes of disciplinary investigations are usually kept confidential, but \u201cbecause of the speculation and information floating around, we wanted to make sure, insofar as we could, that more accurate details and information were shared separate complaint against Levi was investigated during the 2016-2017 school year, after which \u201che was required to take a sabbatical and undergo college-mandated counseling and coaching,\u201d according to the recent statement from Carleton. In a Carletonian article published April 21, 2017 Nagel stated, \u201cNo Carleton faculty member has been suspended for this upcoming year.\u201d In the same article, Levi stated have decided to extend the sabbatical was already scheduled to take in the spring to also include the winter and fall.\u201d The Carletonian is currently investigating this inconsistency. Nagel added that the two complaints concerned different incidents, and the statement notes that \u201cthere have been no formal complaints against Professor Levi with respect to actions after the 2016-2017 academic year.\u201d In addition to Levi\u2019s mandatory leave of absence, Nagel said, the college has discontinued his off-campus study program and has no plans to reinstate it. The College\u2019s official statement also asserts that Levi will not be permitted to teach any courses required for the Sociology/Anthropology major, \u201cso that no student is required to take any course from him.\u201d Nagel says the decision concerning Levi\u2019s eligibility to teach first-year Argument and Inquiry (A&I) seminars \u201chas not been made yet.\u201d For Ross Grogan-Kaylor \u201921, who last spring advocated against Levi teaching an A&I, this is a possibility he \u201creally doesn\u2019t like.\u201d If Levi were to teach an in the future, as he had been slated to do this fall before the Title complaint was upheld, \u201csome freshmen would have no choice in whether they took a class of his or not.\u201d Nagel said that first years \u201cwould not be forced to take an A&I\u201d taught by Levi because they could select other A&Is during summer pre- registration or switch into another during the registration period. She did not respond to the question of whether or not the college would inform incoming students of Levi\u2019s Title violation before the end of registration. According to Registrar Emy Farley, Levi\u2019s was full by the time the investigation concluded. One parent posted on the Carleton parents\u2019 Facebook page that her son had been assigned to Levi\u2019s A&I, but was notified on August 14 that the class had been cancelled. While Aaron Forman \u201921, a former student of Levi\u2019s, \u201cfully trust[s] President Poskanzer and the administration to make the correct decision\u201d regarding which classes Levi should teach, Grogan-Kaylor is \u201c100% adamant in believing Levi should not teach an A&I,\u201d and said he \u201cwould support student action to disallow Levi from teaching A&Is.\u201d Still, Grogan-Kaylor \u201cwould not support attempts to fire Levi\u201d without knowing more details about the specific allegations against him. According to the official college statement regarding Levi\u2019s absence this fall, \u201cthe wellbeing of our students and community is our greatest priority, and we are committed to ensuring the Carleton campus is a respectful environment where all members of our college community feel comfortable.\u201d Levi will return to the classroom next term, Winter 2020, and is listed on the Hub as teaching Introduction to Anthropology and Anthropology of Humor during that term."} |
7,232 | Greg Osby | Berklee College of Music | [
"7232_101.pdf",
"7232_102.pdf",
"7232_103.pdf",
"7232_104.pdf"
] | {"7232_101.pdf": "( YouTube Launching Premium Lite\u2014How Will This Impact Music Subscriptions? ( Home ( Pop Culture ( Scandals ( 11 Berklee Professors Committed Sexual Assault \u2014 And Were Quietly Dismissed Daniel Sanchez ( November 14, 2017 4 ( ( content/uploads/2017/11/Berklee-College-Rob-Simmonds.jpg) While former Berklee College students/victims struggle to pay off student loans, their perpetrators apparently have comfy new jobs at other schools. You may recognize some of the following names. \uf0c9 \uf178 \uf007 \uf002 \uf105 \uf105 \uf007 \uf017 \uf0e5 Privacy - Terms Quincy Jones. Meghan Trainor. Joey Kramer. Steven Tyler. However, you may not recognize the following names so easily. Jeff Galindo. Greg Osby. Aruan Ortiz. What\u2019s the difference? In the first list, you\u2019ll find distinguished Berklee College of Music alumni. In the second, you\u2019ll find disgraced professors who allegedly sexually assaulted their students and walked away scot-free. Promising transparency once the damage has been done. At a crowded, campus-wide forum, Berklee College of Music President Roger Brown admitted that the illustrious school has let go of 11 faculty members in the past thirteen years \u201cfor sexual misconduct ( campus/wXBMrQVkSz968DA3OixqMP/story.html?p1=Article_Recommended_ReadMore_Pos2).\u201d At Berklee College\u2019s renowned concert hall, Brown apologized for the slow response to sexual assault claims. He also vowed that the school would have a \u201cfaster and more transparent system for dealing with sexual misconduct.\u201d \u201cTo everyone who has been harassed or abused at Berklee am so sorry.\u201d Brown has led the school since 2004 apologize for this institution. It\u2019s unacceptable. It breaks my heart. It goes against everything that makes me want to be here in the first place.\u201d According to Brown, some students at the school, and even faculty members, don\u2019t believe sexual harassment is a \u201creal issue.\u201d He told students at the packed, 1,250-seat Berklee Performance Center, \u201cWe need to change that attitude.\u201d ( xai=AKAOjstRjIXISoc9X4gb2qo4C27d5pPzgHmHJ3XXNXzTUypseqPWOZxsXEmN8Z8hTLUE6yZGg21B7QhV9czt8iyZMJAdgsBVpwFX_h8BcttgSg0X3GggBKDWYLLH_QZa4cbZVpePg _VHISr7N_uLnfRdxdufuyD4HzaclmuWibXJByAYg4xHTT5sUHdJj0MVQ_HeQAr8kHZjjtJYkp2pJf8MPUhzXPy4mY78ffk4jIGxFekG9qfdZD8dw0GQfihoheuT1oxyh3VwnUhJW62yV7IWFgQ YRLPag3PTaO6eIbGGg07_UXQThMZFA6DBpWqayRGE6YQl4SlRRTb1ebiPzmSMUfSHQ88_fI38- UCW09EzTOC9gahv62cFLPZlA&sig=Cg0ArKJSzEaE7NsmqCZq&fbs_aeid=%5Bgw_fbsaeid%5D&adurl= DMN-DT) Ad ends in 18s Hiding sexual misconduct. The stunning admission came after the Boston Globe published a damning investigative report ( lets-teachers-quietly-leave-after-alleged-sexual-abuse-students-least-one-found-another-teaching-job/yfCkCCmdJzxkiEgrQK4cWM/story.html) last week. According to the Globe, administrators actively \u201ctolerated lecherous behavior\u201d for years. To protect the school\u2019s famed reputation, school officials \u201coften silenced the accusers through financial settlements.\u201d Victims would have to sign confidentiality agreements to receive a settlement spokesman for the school declined the name the eleven faculty members terminated. One of them, Jeff Galindo, was a popular jazz musician and professor. He had assaulted a former student after walking her home from a party. He allegedly wanted to make sure that the unnamed student \u201carrived safely because she was so drunk.\u201d Then, after waking up, Galindo reportedly groped her while she fought off \u201cwaves of nausea.\u201d Following the harrowing ordeal, he would later apologetically admit to his student via multiple text messages, \u201cI\u2019m truly sorry for hurting you promise will never again\u2026 By the way, just to let you know, we never [had intercourse never got it up was too drunk. It doesn\u2019t excuse anything, but thought I\u2019d let you know what a loser am.\u201d Administrators at Berklee College pressured the student not to move forward with a court case after reporting the assault. They had vowed that Galindo \u201cwould never work at another school.\u201d Yet, the accuser later found out that Galindo would teach at the New England Conservatory. After notifying the school of the sexual assault, he worked at the Longy School of Music of Bard College. Speaking with the Globe, the unnamed woman explained her motivation for notifying other schools. \u201cIf didn\u2019t report him [to other schools], it would be on me if he did this again.\u201d Galindo didn\u2019t provide a statement. Unlike with other accusers, Berklee College didn\u2019t provide the former student with a financial settlement. Administrators had also failed to provide an apology, both to her and the school. Gag ordering the alleged perpetrators. Another professor at Berklee College, Greg Osby, spoke with the Boston Globe former student had accused the popular jazz saxophonist of sexual assault back in 2012. In an hourlong interview with the Globe, Osby disputed the woman\u2019s claims. \u201cOnly an idiot would sleep with students, and am not an idiot would not do that. But after they graduate, it\u2019s open season.\u201d He wouldn\u2019t fight the charges, however, as he admitted to being \u201cburned out teaching there.\u201d \u201cBottom line is, and this is a bit harsh, if anyone saw my girlfriend at that time and saw [the accuser] that would probably end the argument. Why would jeopardize my career for somebody like that?\u201d According to Osby, Berklee College provided him with a \u201cseverance package\u2026that included a gag order cultural gesture or sexual misconduct? In a statement to the Globe, Berklee College said that they act quickly on sexual assault claims. \u201cAs evidenced by our past practices, where an investigation reveals a serious violation of our sexual misconduct policy, we act swiftly and decisively to remove the individuals from our community.\u201d Another accuser\u2019s claims would contradict the school\u2019s statement. In 2008, keyboarding professor Aruan Ortiz allegedly offered a freshman to \u201chelp with her technique.\u201d He allegedly phoned the student late one evening, \u201casking to come over to her apartment and offer instruction.\u201d Once the instruction started, however, Ortiz reportedly licked the woman, grabbed her, and attempted to kiss her. He would continue the behavior \u201cas the woman walked him to the door and asked him to leave week later, Ortiz left the student a voicemail, asking her \u201cif she was free that evening.\u201d The woman quickly reported the behavior to Berklee College administrators. Yet, the school only held a meeting with the professor two months later. According to the woman, however, an unrepentant Ortiz would repeat his lewd behavior at the meeting. He allegedly grabbed her face, tried to kiss her, and blew in her ear. In a lawsuit filed against him, Ortiz would claim that the gesture \u201cwas simply part of his [Cuban] culture.\u201d Two weeks after the meeting, administrators told the woman that he \u201cwould no longer be teaching at Berklee.\u201d Ortiz, at the behest of Berklee College\u2019s insurance company, would later settle the lawsuit on confidential terms. The woman had cited a gag order on the settlement. Paying for tuition while offenders walk away without punishment. For Galindo\u2019s victim, several years would pass before she finally \u201ccame to terms\u201d with what happened. Now in her late 20s, the former student now works as a full- time musician. Speaking with the Globe about her painful experience, she said came to a point where could let this ruin my career or just move on\u2026 [However got [screwed] in every way and will be paying Berklee for the next seven years.\u201d Featured image by Rob Simmonds by 2.0 ( $6 (HTTPS://WWW.DIGITALMUSICNEWS.COM/PRO/SPOTIFY-MUSIC-PRO-HARD-LOOK-WEEKLY/) Paul Resnikoff ( February 19, 2025 \uf007 \uf017 ( ARM? (HTTPS://WWW.DIGITALMUSICNEWS.COM/PRO/UMG-WMG-SPOTIFY- SONY-LEVERAGE-NEXT/) Paul Resnikoff ( February 12, 2025 \uf007 \uf017 ( (HTTPS://WWW.DIGITALMUSICNEWS.COM/2025/01/12/MANDY-MOORE-SHARING-A-GOFUNDME-SPARKS-BACKLASH/) Ashley King ( January 12, 2025 \uf007 \uf017 4 ( dhenn November 15, 2017 ( Disgusting. Particularly this Osby clown. That\u2019s exactly the kind of thing someone who commit an assault would say and he continues to further assault her to this day by trying to dehumanize her with his despicable description. What a pig. Vail November 15, 2017 ( Not really. He\u2019s just being honest. He says he didn\u2019t do it, and said she\u2019s ugly to him and that his actual girlfriend was better looking, and that he\u2019d never be so stupid as to cross the line with a student. Really simple. pro victim December 3, 2017 ( Vail, CO, what a despicable asshole you are. he\u2019s guilty (HTTPS://WWW.DIGITALMUSICNEWS.COM/2025/01/09/DIDDY-ACCUSERS-ID-DOCUSERIES/) Ashley King ( January 9, 2025 Your email address Sign up a March 6, 2018 ( What makes him a \u201cdespicable asshole\u201d? He\u2019s neutrally relating a statement which somebody else made. And in this statement, someone (Osby) provides 2 perfectly cogent arguments against the career-ruining allegations made against him. And he was fired anyway. Who\u2019s to say he\u2019s not the \u201cvictim\u201d for you to be \u201cpro\u201d? You don\u2019t know the truth of that situation any better than anyone else \u2014 unless you have some inside information which you care to share? Believing every accusation of sexual assault without proof will end up costing more in public good than it gains in justice don\u2019t want to live in a world where any man can be destroyed by any woman with just a word. Whatever sins the patriarchy may have committed, that\u2019s a worse world than the one we live in and wouldn\u2019t trust any human \u2013 man or woman \u2013 with that sort of unlimited power. Put yourself in everybody\u2019s shoes. Terms of Use (/terms-of-use/) | Privacy policy (/privacy-policy/) | Privacy settings () Digital Music News \u00a92025. All Rights Reserved Categories ( Pro ( Events ( Sync News ( Jobs Listings ( ( About Us (", "7232_102.pdf": "Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job By Kay Lazar, The Boston Globe November 8, 2017 8 minutes to read Berklee College of Music in Boston. Paul Marotta/Getty Images 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 1/9 She woke up naked and unnerved. Her professor, her mentor at Berklee College of Music, was groping her as she tried to push him away while fighting off waves of nausea. Jeff Galindo, a popular jazz musician and instructor at the school, had walked her home from a party the night before to make sure she arrived safely because she was so drunk. All she wanted was to banish memories of that nightmarish experience in the spring of 2012. But weeks later Galindo, who had been on tour much of the time since that night, begged forgiveness from his student in a series of bizarre texts. ADVERTISEMENT: \u201cI\u2019m truly sorry for hurting you promise will never again,\u2019\u2019 Galindo said in texts shared with the Globe by the woman, then a junior and one of the few female students in her department. \u201cBy the way, just to let you know, we never [had intercourse],\u2019\u2019 said another text in the mea culpa never got it up was too drunk. It doesn\u2019t excuse anything, but thought I\u2019d let you know what a loser am Globe investigation has uncovered a culture of blatant sexual harassment at Berklee with at least three male professors, including Galindo, allowed to quietly leave since 2008, after students reported being assaulted, groped, or pressured into sex with their teachers, according to court documents and interviews with more than a dozen people. Administrators at the renowned music school tolerated lecherous behavior, former Berklee students and employees said, and often silenced the accusers through financial settlements with gag orders attached. ADVERTISEMENT: Berklee administrators defended the school\u2019s track record, saying in a statement that Berklee has rigorous policies and procedures to deal with claims of sexual harassment. \u201cAlthough we do not discuss specific matters publicly out of respect for all involved and limitations on what we are legally permitted to share, we take matters that impede the learning or working environment of our students, faculty, and staff seriously and act promptly to address them,\u2019\u2019 the school said. 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 2/9 The allegations against the Berklee professors come at a time of heightened attention to sexual harassment following revelations about Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, who faces accusations of groping, raping, and harassing women for decades. Since the scandal became public last month, women have felt empowered to speak up about alleged abuse, especially when they believe their abusers remain free to victimize others. The woman who reported being assaulted by Galindo said that when she initially spoke with Berklee administrators in 2012, they discouraged her from pressing forward with a court case because, she said, they assured her Galindo would never work at another school. Yet Galindo went on to teach at the New England Conservatory in Boston. The woman, who asked to remain anonymous because she fears professional reprisals, was horrified to discover in 2016 that Galindo was teaching again and notified the conservatory. His contract there was not renewed, according to the school. But he continued working at the Longy School of Music of Bard College in Cambridge until last week, when the woman found out he was employed there, contacted administrators, and the school severed ties with him. Galindo had worked there since 2009. ADVERTISEMENT: \u201cIf didn\u2019t report him [to other schools], it would be on me if he did this again,\u2019\u2019 the woman said. Still, Galindo has continued teaching. He is listed as a part-time faculty member at the Rivers School, a college prep school in Weston. Christine Martin, a Rivers spokeswoman, said Tuesday that Galindo has been affiliated with the school since 2015, and that he arrived with positive references. She was unable to say who had provided those references. Berklee, in a statement, said one institution requested a reference regarding Galindo and \u201cwe provided the termination letter which included an explicit statement that explained the reasons for his departure from the college Berklee spokesman declined to say when that correspondence happened or which institution requested the information. 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 3/9 Galindo did not return calls and text messages from the Globe seeking comment. But another former Berklee professor accused of sexual misconduct, prominent jazz saxophonist Greg Osby, did speak with the Globe woman accused Osby in 2012 of pressuring her to have sex while she was a student at Berklee. The woman, who also asked to remain anonymous, had graduated several years earlier and established a successful music career, but later reported him to Berklee administrators after growing concerned he might still be preying on students could not bear the feeling that had a responsibility to do something about this,\u2019\u2019 said the woman about her decision to finally contact Berklee. Osby, in an hourlong interview with the Globe, disputed the woman\u2019s claims. He also said that he received a severance package from Berklee that included a gag order. \u201cOnly an idiot would sleep with students, and am not an idiot,\u2019\u2019 Osby said would not do that. But after they graduate, it\u2019s open season.\u2019\u2019 Osby said Berklee did not give him a chance to defend himself against the claims, but he decided not to contest the charges because he was burned out teaching there. \u201cBottom line is, and this is a bit harsh, if anyone saw my girlfriend at that time and saw [his Berklee accuser] that would probably end the argument,\u2019\u2019 Osby said. \u201cWhy would jeopardize my career for somebody like that?\u2019\u2019 The statement issued by Berklee said the school is committed to a \u201cfair and thorough process for both complainant and respondent,\u2019\u2019 and that not every case leads to a finding. \u201cAs evidenced by our past practices, where an investigation reveals a serious violation of our sexual misconduct policy, we act swiftly and decisively to remove the individuals from our community,\u2019\u2019 Berklee said. Yet a case filed earlier this year with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, or MCAD, raises questions about Berklee\u2019s commitment to address the 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 4/9 issue 2012 Berklee grad who was hired to run the school\u2019s audio production lab, accused a male co-worker of predatory behavior, according to a complaint she filed with in January. She described unwanted sexual advances by her co-worker toward female students in the lab in mid-2015 and then retaliation against her \u2014 leaving condoms in the lab and suggesting sexual liaisons \u2014 when she reported his behavior to their boss. But Berklee administrators waited weeks to act, and then failed to monitor the co- worker, who repeatedly violated an order they issued for him to stay away from her, the complaint states. ADVERTISEMENT: The woman also accused Berklee of brushing off her concerns about inappropriate sexual behavior by a professor in the school\u2019s music production department last year. She \u201ccontinued to observe and experience a pattern, practice, and pervasive culture of tolerance of sexual harassment at Berklee,\u2019\u2019 according to the complaint. Berklee settled the case in April, and that settlement is sealed, too. The woman, and her attorney, North Reading lawyer John W. Davis, declined to comment. The former student who accused Galindo of assaulting her when she was too drunk to fend him off said she worked up the nerve to report him to Berklee administrators about six months later. He was let go shortly after. There was no notice to students, no apology to the woman, and no financial settlement. The woman, who was receiving a partial scholarship, said she was afraid even to apply for additional financial aid from Berklee after she reported the assault because Galindo accused her of concocting the story to gain more scholarship money wanted to be believed so bad,\u2019 the woman said thought if ever said anything about money, no one would ever believe me.\u2019\u2019 Instead, she sought and received private therapy, paid for by Berklee, to help her deal with the trauma. She showed the Globe e-mails from Angela F. F. Davis, then Berklee\u2019s associate dean of students, authorizing these payments. 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 5/9 One of her former professors, Tom Plsek, now chair emeritus of the brass department at Berklee, also confirms the woman\u2019s story. ADVERTISEMENT: \u201cShe confided first in a female faculty member . . . and then found out about it from that female faculty member,\u2019\u2019 Plsek said. Galindo \u201cwas made to take his things and go don\u2019t know the exact process, but he was gone [from Berklee] in a few days.\u2019\u2019 Plsek retired as department chair in 2013 but still teaches a few courses. His wife, Stephany Tiernan, a professor and chair emerita of the school\u2019s piano department, has also borne witness to sexual harassment allegations. In one case, a freshman alleged her keyboarding professor, Aruan Ortiz, decided she needed more help with her technique and phoned her late one evening in February 2008, asking to come over to her apartment and offer instructions. The woman had a friend staying with her and \u201ctherefore felt safe, and otherwise did not wish to refuse assistance from an instructor,\u2019\u2019 so she agreed, according to a 2009 lawsuit filed in District Court in Boston. But that instruction quickly turned sour, as soon as the woman\u2019s friend left the room, the suit states, with Ortiz licking the woman, grabbing her, and repeatedly attempting to kiss her. The woman freed herself and ran to her friend in the bathroom. Ortiz then acted as if nothing happened but repeated the behavior as the woman walked him to the door and asked him to leave, according to the lawsuit. She went home to Ohio to tell her parents, but came back a week later only to find a voice message from Ortiz asking her if she was free that evening. That\u2019s when the woman reported his behavior to Berklee administrators. They waited two weeks to start investigating \u2014 and only after two of the woman\u2019s instructors urged them to act, according to the lawsuit. It took another two months for Berklee to hold a meeting with Ortiz and the student to review the allegations. Tiernan, who attended that meeting, according to the lawsuit, declined to comment for this story. 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 6/9 ADVERTISEMENT: In that meeting, Ortiz admitted to grabbing the woman\u2019s face, attempting to kiss her, and blowing in her ear. He claimed \u201cit was simply part of his [Cuban] culture,\u2019\u2019 according to the lawsuit. It would take Berklee another two weeks \u2014 after classes had ended for the semester \u2014 to inform the woman Ortiz would no longer be teaching at Berklee. The lawsuit, which alleged civil rights violations, and assault and battery, was settled in 2010. The woman, citing a gag order on the settlement, declined to comment. So did her Boston attorney, Paul F. Wood. But Woburn attorney David Fried, who initially represented Ortiz in the case, said in a statement to the Globe that a \u201csingle clumsy attempt at a kiss, although certainly improper from a teacher to student, was not \u2018sexual harassment\u2019 within the meaning of any relevant statute.\u2019\u2019 Fried said that Ortiz hired him because Berklee\u2019s insurance company initially declined to represent him. \u201cEventually they stepped up to the plate, probably because they wanted to settle the whole thing, and withdrew in their favor,\u2019\u2019 Fried said. The case was then settled, with terms confidential. The woman who reported Galindo\u2019s alleged assault to Berklee said it took her several years to come to terms with what happened. She is now in her late 20s and a full-time musician came to a point where could let this ruin my career or just move on,\u2019\u2019 she said. But there is one constant reminder of that dark experience \u2014 her school loans for tuition at Berklee. ADVERTISEMENT: 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 7/9 got [screwed] in every way and will be paying Berklee for the next seven years,\u2019\u2019 she said, but Galindo was allowed to walk away. Most Popular In Related News Karen Read case: Judge sheds more light on \u2018grave concern\u2019 1 Police search for man who turned a Beverly bar into his \u2018personal bathroom\u2019 2 Ahead of 6 shows in Boston, Ni can't quite believe it 3 Mass. Teachers Association removes alleged antisemitic materials that sparked backlash 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 8/9 \u00a92025 Newton man charged with \u2018abusive sexual contact\u2019 with minor on flight to Boston Boston judge blocks transfer of trans woman to men's prison Tell Us What You Think 2/22/25, 10:09 Berklee College let teachers quietly leave after alleged sexual abuse of students. At least one found another teaching job 9/9", "7232_103.pdf": "Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 1/11 My birthday is January 20, a day that has seen its share of snowstorms, Super Bowls, and inaugurations. This year skipped the swearing-in ceremony in favor of just plain swearing, out in the cold, with hundreds of thousands of others in the streets of New York City. Feminism, let it be known, is my second-favorite word. I\u2019d used the weeks since Election Day to volunteer on behalf of the Women\u2019s March. I\u2019ve spent the weeks and months that followed this frenzied, furious parade watching and waiting to see how women everywhere have been stirred to action by our new political reality. Watching as the women of Silicon Valley came forward to expose the men who have harassed them. Watching as the women of Hollywood came forward to detonate rumors of the casting couch spectacularly. Watching as women in the media came forward, ending the careers of powerful hosts. Watching as women have righteously assailed our politicians. Watching as the women \u2013 and men \u2013 of classical and new music articulated how their realms have felt the oppressive effects of gender. But the women of jazz have not come forward as have long hoped and imagined they would do not think they are coming. You might read this and respond, Wait: jazz is having its own #MeToo moment. Wasn\u2019t there just a big feature in The New York Times? An essay on the website? Indeed. There was also the revelation, reported by the Boston Globe, that 11 faculty members were dismissed from the Berklee College of Music for sexual harassment over the last 13 years\u2014and that saxophonist Steve Kirby had been hired to teach there after his dismissal from the University of Manitoba for sexual harassment. Or we might point to the problematic interview exchange between pianists Ethan Iverson and Rob Glasper last spring concerning women\u2019s embodied responses to music; the backlash snowballed into what we may refer to as \u201cThe Saga of Musical Clitoris,\u201d as sharply critiqued by NPR\u2019s Michelle Mercer. When say that feel the absence of women of jazz from this movement, what mean is that comparatively few female musicians have raised their voices publicly to initiate conversations about harassment\u2014 women who know to have more than their share of stories to tell, women who deserve to be heard. The exception is 19 year-old vibraphonist Sasha Berliner, who authored a courageous blog post Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 2/11 addressed as an open letter to Iverson on the sexism that she has already faced as a young woman in jazz. Those who reported their harassers at Berklee have remained anonymous in the press (which should be their right). Men have been responsible for some of the prominent media coverage. Giovanni Russonello contributed the women in jazz roundup for the Times. Nate Chinen solicited and edited the essay by baritone saxophonist Lauren Sevian for WBGO. The message from these two pieces is that it\u2019s possible for women today to overcome the circumstances of their gender\u2014and that it\u2019s getting better for the women in jazz, generally speaking. Oh, really? At best, this perception is a superficial gloss on the reality faced by women working in jazz. At worst, it\u2019s a dangerous assumption that allows the men to remain comfortable, while diverting attention from the still thriving jazz patriarchy. Sasha Berliner Photograph courtesy Jazz In courses teach every semester find myself reminding students about one of the basic tenets of music: We deal not only in sound, but also in silence. Silence structures sound. Silence can be anticipatory, or it can create the impression of finality. In it, we might hear anger, sadness, frustration, or longing. Any of us who writes worth a damn has learned to cultivate silence in ourselves, so that others may speak. Writers are supposed to listen\u2026 not only to what people wish to tell us \u2014what they want us to hear\u2014but also for what is missing from their stories Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 3/11 The comparative absence of women\u2019s voices in jazz during this greater political moment must be heard as a dark presence. As activist Tillie Olsen famously wrote decades ago: \u201cThese are not natural silences\u2014 what Keats called agonie ennuyeuse (the tedious agony)\u2014that necessary time for renewal, lying fallow, gestation, in the natural cycle of creation. The silences speak of here are unnatural: the unnatural thwarting of what struggles to come into being, but cannot.\u201d Take, for example, Sevian\u2019s essay, which ostensibly focuses on an incident from her days as a student 20 years ago mentor at the school she attended \u2013 we aren\u2019t told who \u2013 said something grossly inappropriate about Sevian. She doesn\u2019t disclose what he said, only that it was relayed to her by a male friend and ensemble mate. The impact of the words spoken by someone to whom she had entrusted her education made Sevian seriously consider dropping out, even quitting music altogether. She wanted to report the incident, but an administrator dissuaded her. Eventually she convinced herself to allow this harsh reality to fuel her desire to become the best player she could be. And she\u2019s a fine player at that. While respect Sevian\u2019s grit and have perhaps only a sliver of understanding when it comes to the pressures she\u2019s faced not only as a woman in jazz, but as an exceptionally beautiful white female performer, I\u2019m awfully tired of narratives that extoll the virtues of facing sexism\u2014or any other kind of prejudice. It\u2019s a troubling kind of lemonade that broadcasts a positive outcome for the victim, instead of demanding accountability from the perpetrators. Although Sevian understands the power dynamic that allowed this to happen, she refers to what was said merely as \u201cdistasteful\u201d and \u201ca seedy little comment,\u201d failing to label what it really is: harassment, pure and simple, and against university policies. It is a form of discrimination. Any editor should have been more careful about drawing this distinction. These points aside, scratch the story\u2019s surface and you\u2019ll notice the shadows: hard experiences of which Sevian will not speak. She mentions in passing that she\u2019d been subject to \u201cinappropriate physical advances\u201d already before this incident occurred during her freshman year. In the years that followed, she tells us about waking up on a tour bus to find someone rubbing her leg and having her ass grabbed by a bandmate. There were, in fact, many more times when things \u201cgot physical Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 4/11 could write a novel about it,\u201d she stated in a comment to the online forum, which she subsequently deleted. \u201cBut chose not to write about this.\u201d Suddenly, her triumphant picture has lost its glow. What kind of choice has it been for Sevian to remain silent, one that she and other women musicians are compelled to make, time and time again choice to purposefully sublimate emotional pain choice to withhold knowledge and keep one\u2019s sense of agency choice for self- preservation? No choice at all for many, because of the risk of irrevocable harm to their careers in what is a challenging and unstable profession for musicians of all genders. This is where we would find Sevian\u2019s real #MeToo story, if she were able to tell it, and a narrative common to so many women in jazz. Detail from a message the musician Becca Patterson shared in a Facebook post As a non-musician but nevertheless a professional woman in the field have been privy to enough women\u2019s tales to know that Sevian\u2019s experiences aren\u2019t anomalous, and that they continue to happen. Women talk about harassment plenty among themselves. While will not divulge any particulars, since these are not my stories to tell, I\u2019ve known women who have been assaulted by club managers; whose mentors or prospective mentors have attempted to coerce them into sexual relationships; and whose teachers have made them the subject of demeaning sexual remarks. When women work in bands led by men, many have faced the traumatizing experience of being exposed to behavior demeaning to women in general, from pornography casually consumed on band buses to the naked sexual exploits of their bandmates. What woman would want to talk about this publicly? And to Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 5/11 whom would they bring their complaints? Such a burden is truly awful and unfair. Beyond sexual harassment have yet to encounter anyone who has not suffered acutely from self-doubt for the simple fact of being female\u2014the piercing apprehension that comes from wondering if you didn\u2019t get the gig because of your gender or because you weren\u2019t good enough. (In some cases, it\u2019s perfectly clear: see Becca Paterson\u2019s recent post about a big band casting call.) \u201cEach moment is like this\u2014before it can be known, categorized as similar to another thing and dismissed, it has to be experienced, it has to be seen,\u201d writes poet Claudia Rankine in Citizen, her lyrical masterpiece on racism. \u201cWhat did he just say? Did she really just say that? Did hear what think heard? Did that just come out of my mouth, his mouth, your mouth? The moment stinks.\u201d We move on, Rankine shows us, but are unable to let go. Our perceptions of reality, forever changed, remain unsteady, unsure. This is the tax imposed by difference was once myself on close personal terms with this specter of doubt. Pay attention to bylines, and you quickly realize that music journalism has its own patriarchy. When was younger was told on several occasions that write like a man. It ran counter to expectations of gender gradually surmised, for young women to produce strong, direct, authoritative prose discovered that would do better pitching editors by email rather than by phone (in the days when you actually could reach an editor by phone). Were they persuaded more easily by my disembodied arguments than by a female voice on the line? Some of these men looked surprised when we finally met in person, as if wasn\u2019t what they expected. At times felt decidedly out of my element mingling with them at press parties and happy hours, or discussing coverage idea over three-scotch lunches. One powerful musician who didn\u2019t like how I\u2019d written about him felt entitled to call one of my editors and ask him to take me off of another assignment. The editor\u2014who no longer recalls the incident and therefore cannot corroborate it\u2014refused, and at the time we laughed about it no longer find it quite so amusing. Another editor, for whom was writing at one of the major jazz magazines, joked with me about putting Cassandra Wilson in a thong on the cover of a forthcoming women\u2019s issue. After complained to the publisher, who did not reprimand the editor decided that had no desire to write for the outlet again. One of the reasons stopped reviewing recordings was because didn\u2019t want to be responsible for determining which female musicians Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 6/11 were \u201cgood enough\u201d on what knew was an uneven playing field, or to have my own worth questioned for holding that all female musicians are worthy of consideration, respect, and an equal shot at the opportunities that make possible the highest levels of artistic achievement. Beyond the media patriarchy have my own collection of #MeToo jazz stories, though they\u2019re mild-mannered compared to those of female performers. By the time got to New York, a fat handful of unwelcome experiences in graduate school had taught me how to dodge some bullets. One well-known freelancer, a vocal-jazz specialist still widely published, harassed me steadily for months. He set his email address book so that any message he sent to me was addressed automatically to \u201cThe Beautiful, Statuesque Lara Pellegrinelli,\u201d and ignored my professional inquiries or responded with personal musings still have the emails.) He would stare blatantly at my chest on the not infrequent occasions we encountered each other at events, even in the presence of my then boyfriend (now my husband, to whom falls the dubious pleasure of editing this essay). Once, having inquired about a job opening at a record label was invited by the executive in charge of hiring \u2013 someone knew already \u2013 on an outing to \u201chear some music and discuss.\u201d The evening began with glasses of wine over an elegant dinner, and concluded with smoking weed backstage with the artists recall wondering whether it would be more conducive to landing the position if took a drag or passed the joint along. Silly me! This wasn\u2019t really a job interview\u2026 it was a date. Those stories strike me as especially relevant here. They demonstrate so clearly how assumptions about women in the jazz world revealed by Ethan Iverson\u2019s interview with Robert Glasper play out, whether consciously or as the product of implicit bias. Let\u2019s review \u201cThe Saga of Musical Clitoris\u201d for a moment. \u201cI\u2019ve seen what that does to the audience, playing that groove,\u201d Glasper explained to Iverson love making the audience feel that way. Getting back to women: women love that. They don\u2019t love a whole lot of soloing. When you hit that one groove and stay there, it\u2019s like musical clitoris. You\u2019re there, you stay on that groove, and the women\u2019s eyes close and they start to sway, going into a trance.\u201d It\u2019s laughable know, but stay with me Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 7/11 Michelle Mercer nails the implications of Glasper\u2019s sexualized stereotypes. \u201cI\u2019ve heard variations on the \u2018women can\u2019t really follow jazz\u2019 theme ever since first started hitting jazz clubs and loving extremely long solos,\u201d she writes. \u201cTo be a female jazz fan and critic is to live with a frustrating irreconcilability have an intellectual passion for creative, complex music and, sometimes, the musicians who make that music doubt my ability to appreciate its creativity and complexity.\u201d When the cultural assumption is that women are merely \u201cthe passive vessels for male sounds,\u201d as Mercer puts it, there\u2019s no space left for other kinds of female participation. In my interactions with the harassing writer and the label executive, both saw me only as an object or a potential romantic partner instead of as a colleague or job candidate. Even if Glasper\u2019s assessment of women is patently ridiculous, the personal erasure experienced in those moments and others is its direct result. As a matter of fact had one of those moments with Glasper himself. When was working for the night of his 2010 webcast from the Village Vanguard was with Glasper in the club\u2019s office while he chatted and joked with his bandmates attempted to introduce myself, but rated only a curt acknowledgement\u2014the subtext of which seemed to be, leave us alone. Confronting this invisibility once can be painful; having the patience and endurance to confront it over and over again is a more formidable challenge. It\u2019s exhausting to have to keep asserting belong here. Women in jazz may never trust that they can be heard until they\u2019re certain that they can be seen for what and who they are. The artist roster page on the Posi-Tone website depicts male artists only. It could very well be that conditions are getting better for women in jazz, but am not yet convinced. In his recent New York Times essay, Russonello interviews a handful of women who count among jazz\u2019s Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 8/11 brightest lights and most promising talents. Lord knows, if opportunities haven\u2019t improved for Terri Lyne Carrington or Esperanza Spalding, what hope does the rest of the band have? Wider recognition for exceptional talents does not indicate a progressive shift in jazz culture as a whole. Yet if you substitute the names Regina Carter, Ingrid Jensen, and Renee Rosnes for Carrington and Spalding, Russonello\u2019s article could have been written when first arrived in New York almost 20 years ago\u2014and maybe even 15 years before that. Someone at cultural mainstay Jazz at Lincoln Center tried to sell me on the \u201cit\u2019s getting better\u201d narrative at the turn of the century, and wasn\u2019t buying it. Even after that institution\u2019s much-touted overtures, there still are no permanent female big band members, despite the repeated efforts of women to break the glass ceiling. I\u2019m equally skeptical of Sevian\u2019s onward-and-upward takeaway\u2014not only for the reasons elaborated above, but also because she goes out of her way to praise the men who have aided her career, while omitting her female contemporaries. If the men are so open-minded and welcoming these days, then why is Sevian one of only a few women that they\u2019ve allowed into their ranks? Are no other women good enough? Sevian discusses, in particular, her experiences recording for Posi-Tone, a label run by \u201cbig advocates of women in jazz Marc Free and Nick O\u2019Toole,\u201d and for saxophonist Greg Osby\u2019s label, Inner Circle. Stepping up to offer a radically different viewpoint, saxophonist Sarah Manning shared in a recent essay her less than female-friendly experiences with Posi-Tone, pointing out that none of the three female artists in their catalog appear on the label\u2019s artist roster page. Osby, one of the faculty members accused of harassment at Berklee, offered a jaw-dropping statement in a Boston Globe interview, despite having received a severance package that included a gag order. \u201cOnly an idiot would sleep with students, and am not an idiot,\u201d Osby told the paper would not do that. But after they graduate, it\u2019s open season.\u201d There would be no need for skepticism if anyone did the reporting necessary to assess gender parity objectively. For example, it would be a relatively straightforward task to create an annual infographic that represents the number of bands with women leaders performing on U.S. jazz festivals (like those made by Ricky O\u2019Bannon, a reporter formerly embedded with the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra). It would be easy enough to calculate the percentages of women among college jazz Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 9/11 faculty\u2014rumored to top off at 20 percent. It would be simple to tally the numbers of female applicants, as compared to winners, for grants such as those awarded by Chamber Music America\u2014presumably a very small number, to judge by the list of past recipients. To date, Regina Carter remains the only woman in jazz to have been honored as a MacArthur Fellow. The Pulitzer Prize has been awarded to female composers and to jazz composers, but never to a female jazz composer, even posthumously. It\u2019s hard to argue with gathering empirical evidence that would give us a real measuring stick, instead of replicating stories that help men feel good about women\u2019s progress, thus allowing them to overlook the voices not yet raised and still unheard. On the surface, the #MeToo movement is about sex; really, it is about women\u2019s work. Jazz still has a long way to go, and no woman should have to risk her career and livelihood to get there. For now, let\u2019s turn up the silence. Lara Pellegrinelli is an arts journalist and scholar. She\u2019s contributed to National Public Radio, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Village Voice. She teaches at The New School. Last Words: National Sawdust Log at a Time of Transition Last Words: National Sawdust Log at a Time of Transition March 31, 2020 Playlist (Abschied). Playlist (Abschied). March 30, 2020 Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 10/11 On the Record: March 27, 2020 On the Record: March 27, 2020 March 27, 2020 Playlist (Out Beyond Earshot). Playlist (Out Beyond Earshot). March 23, 2020 On the Record: Bandcamp Crisis Response Edition On the Record: Bandcamp Crisis Response Edition March 20, 2020 2022 (646) - 779 - 8455 80 6TH 11249 Email sign-up 2/22/25, 10:09 National Sawdust 11/11", "7232_104.pdf": "With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light Your Classical and Jazz Source | By Nate Chinen Published December 8, 2023 at 1:00 L. David Hinton Alto saxophonist Greg Osby performing at the Center For The Arts in Camden on Oct. 7, 2023. Greg Osby cut a figure out of time, balancing past and future on the bell of his alto saxophone, during a rare concert one evening this fall. To celebrate the release of his new album, Minimalism, he\u2019d set up shop at the Center for the Arts, a gallery and community space in downtown Camden, N.J., with the younger members of his quartet. After stamping a crisp punctuation mark at the end of the title track \u2014 a tune with a Wayne Shorterish harmonic drift, a muted synth sheen, and a pulsating 7/8 meter \u2014 Osby cracked an almost imperceptible smile. \u201cAlright,\u201d he said. \u201cThat went\u2026 better than expected.\u201d This line met with knowing laughter in the amiably jam-packed room; as he had explained before counting off the song, this was the band\u2019s first time playing it live. Next came a misterioso waltz titled \u201cThank You For Your Time,\u201d dedicated to the late Andrew Hill. Osby\u2019s bladelike alto was smartly framed by his rhythm team: bassist Nimrod Speaks, drummer Fabio Rojas, and keyboardist Tal Cohen, whose solo was a deftly surging affair nodding toward the song\u2019s inspiration. The sound of Osby\u2019s last note, held without vibrato over three long bars, was as bracingly clear as afternoon sunlight slanted through a gimlet glass. Print Donate Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 1/14 L. David Hinton The Greg Osby Quartet: Tal Cohen, Fabio Rojas, Greg Osby, Nimrod Speaks. Later in the set, Osby acknowledged the special circumstances of the evening. \u201cIt\u2019s kind of a reemergence of sorts,\u201d he explained, alluding to the fact that Minimalism is his first studio album as a leader in 15 years fell into a compositional rut felt like was repeating myself,\u201d he said. \u201cAlso, the industry changed.\u201d All these factors contributed to a period of relative quiet for Osby, who turned 63 this year. There were other factors as well, which considered as his band dug into \u201cTruth,\u201d a composition from his previous studio release, the 2008 album 9 Levels. That tune combines a dartlike chromatic melody with an undercarriage of fractured funk, though its harmonic foundation is the blues. Its formal intricacies prompted a reconsideration of the title \u2014 something about how truth can be knowable but prismatic, riven with complications. L. David Hinton Alto saxophonist Greg Osby performing at the Center For The Arts in Camden on Oct. 7, 2023. Osby lives on a tree-lined street in Cinnaminson, NJ, not far from the Tacony-Palmyra Bridge. The day after his concert dropped by to talk about his reemergence, his new music, and his generational view on a changing scene. His home gives a neat suburban impression with tasteful modern touches; skylights filled the space with natural light. One large, north-facing room serves as Osby\u2019s studio, office and storage unit, and it was there that we settled in. Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 2/14 An electric piano sat near his computer desk, with sheet music on a stand: the alto sax lead sheet to \u201cThank You For Your Time,\u201d whose title had been scrawled in pencil. (The original working title was printed on the score: \u201cMr. Hill.\u201d) The margins of the room were stacked with bins and banker\u2019s boxes \u2014 a personal archive, chronicling many years of informal study with Osby\u2019s late elders, like Hill, saxophonist Joe Henderson and guitarist Jim Hall take it upon myself to be a natural bridge between generations,\u201d Osby explained. \u201cBecause had the benefit of breaking bread and spending a great amount of time with some of these cherished figures, either through actual performance and playing, or just buying them a glass of wine and pulling all-nighters and grilling them. In these boxes that you see, there are cassettes and videotapes of some of those unedited exchanges have a storage space full of stuff, too.\u201d Frans Schellekens / Redferns Greg Osby performs on July 7, 1990 in Amsterdam. Osby began his career in the early 1980s, after transferring from Howard University to the Berklee College of Music. At Berklee, he was part of a student cohort that included trumpeter Wallace Roney, his fellow saxophonist Donald Harrison, Jr., and drummer Terri Lyne Carrington. \u201cWe were both in Phil Wilson\u2019s Thursday Night Dues Band, which is now the Rainbow Band,\u201d Carrington recalls. \u201cHe also had a gig at Wally\u2019s. We became fast friends.\u201d Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 3/14 Carrington, a 2021 Jazz Master, is almost exactly five years younger than Osby. (Their birthdays fall one day apart.) When he moved to New York in 1982, one of his first major gigs as a sideman was with master drummer Jack DeJohnette, on Carrington\u2019s recommendation. She hit New York herself the following year, moving into Osby\u2019s Brooklyn apartment \u2014 an arrangement that reassured her parents, who considered him family. \u201cBecause we were roommates, he dealt with a lot of my trials and tribulations,\u201d Carrington says. \u201cNo women were playing drums on the scene then. And he would defend me in certain situations when people would talk s\u2013t, especially when wasn\u2019t there. So definitely felt like he had my back. He was somebody would confide in.\u201d Carrington appears on Greg Osby and Sound Theatre, his first album, released on in 1987. (Two years later he played on Real Life Story, her Verve Forecast debut.) Over the next dozen years, as Carrington made her name with Wayne Shorter, Dianne Reeves and others, Osby solidified his stature as a modernist of oblique instinct and brisk execution. He made an acclaimed series of albums for Blue Note Records throughout the \u201890s, including 3 Lifestyles, an early hip-hop experiment that Osby revisited in a recent conversation with WRTI\u2019s J. Michael Harrison, and Art Forum, named one of the albums of the year by the New York Times. L. David Hinton Greg Osby, right, with WRTI's J. Michael Harrison at Vinyl Revival in Lansdowne, PA, on Dec. 2, 2023. Along the way, Osby became a bandleader of exceptional depth and command. \u201cHis live sets are among the most rewarding experiences in jazz clubs at the moment,\u201d wrote Ben Ratliff in a Times profile in 1998, the year Blue Note released Banned in New York. That album, made with a minidisc recorder placed on a table at Sweet Basil, was unorthodox for a major-label release; in order to get it out only months after promoting a studio album, Osby persuaded Blue Note to drop it guerilla-style, at a bargain price. His band on the album featured Jason Moran on piano, Atsushi Osada on bass, and an 18-year-old Rodney Green on drums. Racing through a set of reformulated standards (and one original), the quartet evinces a kind of hivemind lot of it was intuitive, but most of it was through rehearsing,\u201d Osby explains had hand signals behind my back, almost like a pitcher and a catcher. And had rhythmic cues that would play that would announce that something was coming up. If there ever was a greatest hit for me, that was my greatest hit.\u201d Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 4/14 Among the younger musicians who made it so is drummer Tyshawn Sorey, who listened obsessively to Banned as a student at William Paterson University. \u201cHe told me it was like his lullaby,\u201d Osby says. \u201cHe would listen to that record every night. And he had a circle of musicians that would sit and decode or analyze everything that took place.\u201d Jonathan Chimene The Tyshawn Trio +1 at The Jazz Gallery in New York, during an engagement recorded for 'The Off-Off Broadway Guide to Synergism' on Pi Recordings. Early in 2022, Sorey invited Osby to join his trio for a five-night run at The Jazz Gallery in New York, playing music openly indebted to the vibe of Banned. With Aaron Diehl on piano and Russell Hall on bass, they brought a revisionary elasticity to standards as well as Osby\u2019s \u201cPlease Stand By\u201d and anthems by Ornette Coleman, Thelonious Monk and Hill document of the engagement \u2014 The Off-Off-Broadway Guide to Synergism, which Pi Recordings put out as a 3 set \u2014 was one of the year\u2019s most critically hailed jazz releases. That reception had a lot to do with Sorey\u2019s exalted profile, as a MacArthur Fellow straddling a new-music avant-garde and the latest permutations of modern jazz. It also may have had something to do with the crackling energy of a fantastic live recording, coming out of our long pandemic hiatus. But it resonated most because of Osby, whose aesthetic of rigorous digression defines the set, and who had been conspicuously absent from public life for several years, leaving it to others to speculate about his reasons. Looking back, you could call it the successful test launch that brought him back into working orbit. L. David Hinton Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 5/14 Alto saxophonist Greg Osby performing at the Center For The Arts in Camden on Oct. 7, 2023 had a beef with a school in Boston where was teaching, and had to get legal had to let the lawyers do the talking.\u201d This is how Osby broaches the subject of his dismissal from the Berklee College of Music, which followed accusations of sexual misconduct. Osby had joined the faculty at Berklee in 2008, as a full-time professor in the Ensemble Department. At some point he began dating a woman who\u2019d previously been a student, though she was no longer enrolled. After the relationship ended, she brought her complaint to Berklee administrators, claiming that he had pressured her for sex. Osby resigned in 2012, and at the time he decided not to contest the charges. This is where the situation might have remained, if not for a story in the Boston Globe on Nov. 8, 2017, during the first wave of coverage around the #MeToo movement. The article, by Kay Lazar, a public health and accountability reporter, bore the attention- grabbing headline \u2018Berklee let teachers quietly leave after alleged sex abuse, and pushed students for silence.\u2019 Osby, having granted Lazar an hour-long interview, was damningly cited in the piece. \u201cOnly an idiot would sleep with students, and am not an idiot,\u201d read the most egregious of his quotes would not do that. But after they graduate, it\u2019s open season.\u201d Another quote implied that the former student wasn\u2019t attractive enough to be a credible accuser. Osby was swiftly renounced on social media. At a moment when entire industries were beginning to reckon with systemic problems \u2014 most pointedly, the lack of consequences for sexual harassers and abusers \u2014 this was a story that resonated in jazz, and in the broader realm of music education. Erik Jacobs Drummer, bandleader, educator and Jazz Master Terri Lyne Carrington One of the most positive repercussions of the movement was the creation in 2018 of the Berklee Institute of Jazz and Gender Justice, with a stated mission \u201cto support and sustain a cultural transformation in jazz, with the commitment to recruit, teach, mentor, and advocate for musicians seeking to study or perform jazz, with gender justice and racial justice as guiding principles.\u201d Carrington is the founder and artistic director of the institute, and has been a dynamic spokesperson for its mission, manifesting an ideal of \u201cjazz without patriarchy.\u201d Berklee, through its Office of Media Relations, declined to comment on Osby\u2019s departure. But Osby \u2014 who says that during his four years on faculty didn't write one Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 6/14 new song, because was that beat down\u201d \u2014 spoke freely about the situation. Regarding his brief relationship with the former student, whose identity has not been disclosed, he says: \u201cFor better or for worse, she became obsessed. And withdrew, which didn't sit well; the idea that didn't return any phone calls or emails really infuriated her. It got to the point where was almost a victim of being stalked. And the last time that saw her, she more than inferred that would pay for it.\u201d After the Boston Globe story, Osby sought legal action against his accuser for defamation. The case was settled in his favor kept every email, and kept every text message,\u201d he says. \u201cSo that's how my case was won. Because had hard evidence. It wasn't my word.\u201d By contrast, he says Lazar had made no recording of their interview \u2014 a crucial factor, in light of the incendiary quotes at the heart of the story. L. David Hinton Greg Osby at the Center for the Arts, Camden Osby says he issued a complaint to the Globe, which invited him to submit an open letter. He did, but it never ran. He also sent in a statement to the paper\u2019s \u201cFresh Start\u201d initiative, which allows individuals to appeal older stories that have had an adverse impact on their lives. Again, the effort led nowhere. Absent a defamation lawsuit against the Globe, which Osby deems a financially ruinous prospect, that\u2019s probably where it stands. Carrington said she didn\u2019t know enough about the situation to comment. But she has a general point to make about Osby\u2019s character, when it comes to jazz and gender always try to look at the people that were hiring women, like Wayne Shorter,\u201d she says. \u201cAnd over the years feel like Greg has supported women players, which is think something important to recognize.\u201d This is a matter of public record: in addition to his own history with Carrington, pianists Geri Allen and Michele Rosewoman and others, Osby has provided a platform for a Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 7/14 number of emerging women artists. His independent label, Inner Circle Music, has released the debut albums for more than a few such artists, including saxophonists Melissa Aldana and Lauren Sevian; violinists Tomoko Omura and Lisanne Tremblay; vibraphonist Yuhan Su; pianist Jangeun Bae; and singers Sara Serpa, Lara Solnicki, Viktorija Pilatovic and Kavita Shah. Serpa, who first emerged on the scene as a member of Osby\u2019s band, now helps run Mutual Mentorship for Musicians, which she founded with fellow vocalist Jen Shyu as a platform to support women and nonbinary musicians through mentorship opportunities, commissions, festivals and documentation. (It has published five anthologies of writing by women artists.) It feels in keeping with tradition that Osby\u2019s new album includes two compositions by young women he once mentored. The closing track, \u201cNeshama,\u201d is a prayerful incantation by Shimrit Shoshan \u2014 an Israeli pianist of exceptional promise who was preparing to join Osby\u2019s band when she died in 2012, at 29, of cardiac arrest. Earlier in the track list, there\u2019s a song by Becca Stevens, who had been one of Osby\u2019s composition students at the New School. Alessandra Diodati furnishes the vocal on Osby\u2019s dreamlike arrangement of the song, which dates all the way back to Stevens\u2019 self-released debut album in 2008. The title is a simple statement with all manner of unspoken connotations Forgive You.\u201d L. David Hinton Greg Osby at the Center of the Arts in Camden on Oct. 7, 2023. Minimalism derives its title, and to some extent its style, from a process of self- assessment that Osby attributes to feedback from his sister. An academic with a PhD \u2014 but not in music \u2014 she listened to 9 Levels and characterized its sound as \u201cbees buzzing around in a hive,\u201d basically an illegible sensory overload. \u201cShe said, \u2018Perhaps you need to think about how people are receiving this,\u2019\u201d Osby recalls had to ponder on that was like, \u2018Wow.\u2019 And thought about this look of bewilderment in the eyes of a lot of people after my shows.\u201d Earlier in his career, Osby took pride in defying easy comprehension with the complexity of his music always thought, \u2018Man, they gotta come and deal with what we\u2019re dealing with. If explain it demystify it, and it\u2019s not slick.\u2019\u201d But he also saw an Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 8/14 example in one of his heroes, Cannonball Adderley, who knew how to bring every audience into his confidence. Reevaluating, Osby says had to trim a lot had to edit.\u201d Which is not to suggest Minimalism is dumbed-down, or that it has anything to do with the genre by that name. \u201cDedicato,\u201d which features Osby on soprano saxophone, is his tribute to Wayne Shorter, who also haunts the title track. \u201cFacets Squared,\u201d which Osby and his band played in Camden, follows the angular funk logic that once defined the sound of M-BASE, a vanguardist movement that included Osby, Steve Coleman and Geri Allen piece called \u201cOnce Known\u201d involves a brooding ostinato in a sinuous 6/4 meter. Greg Osby, \"Once Known \u2022 5:08 And \u201cYouwan\u201d is a plaintive, slow-groove ballad with a personal resonance. \u201cThat\u2019s a sentimental dedication to my late granddaughter,\u201d Osby says. \u201cShe was 21 when we lost her a year ago in a car accident. She was like the apple of my eye. So she would text me and say \u2018youwan take me to\u2026\u2019 the store, or wherever. And would be at home watching a movie, but could never say no to her.\u201d Musically, Osby\u2019s commitment to a younger cohort is evident in the trust he places in Tal Cohen, Nimrod Speaks and others \u2014 the same trust that once brought us the likes of Rodney Green and Jason Moran. \u201cHe has a great knack for picking amazing younger musicians and grooming them,\u201d Carrington affirms. \u201cPeople that do that are educators, because they\u2019re interested in the next generation. They\u2019re interested in people going for something different and new.\u201d L. David Hinton The Greg Osby Quartet: Fabio Rojas, Tal Cohen, Greg Osby, Nimrod Speaks. As he tiptoes back into active circulation, Osby is thinking a lot about those intentions, and his place in the order of things find that a lot of people in my generation, for lack of a better term, diss a lot of the younger players,\u201d he reflects. \u201cThey say, \u2018That\u2019s not swinging. There\u2019s no jazz elements don't hear the blues,\u2019 and all that kind of stuff. But you have to allow for evolution.\u201d Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 9/14 He pauses thoughtfully. \u201cAnd always try to keep a foot in, and try to be tolerant of these changes \u2014 because not for nothing, these young musicians are playing at a level that was inconceivable to me years ago. They\u2019re developing rapidly at a younger age, and at a much faster pace marvel at that.\u201d Tags Spotlight Greg Osby Berklee College of Music Terri Lyne Carrington Nate Chinen Nate Chinen has been writing about music for more than 25 years. He spent a dozen of them working as a critic for The New York Times, and helmed a long-running column for JazzTimes. As Editorial Director at WRTI, he oversees a range of classical and jazz coverage, and contributes regularly to NPR. See stories by Nate Chinen Classical: Now Playing Saturday Morning Classical 8:00 AM\u20131:00 Up Next: Opera on View Playlist Jazz: Now Playing Jazz Through the Day (HD-2) 6:00 AM\u20136:00 Up Next: El Viaje View Playlist Print Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 10/14 Stay Connected \u00a9 2025 Listen Live Jazz Video Classical Video Arts Desk Contact Us Support Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 11/14 Public Reports Applications Privacy Policy Saturday Morning Classical 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 12/14 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 13/14 2/22/25, 10:09 With a new album and perspective, Greg Osby steps back into the light 14/14"} |
7,717 | Benjamin G. Blount | University of Georgia | [
"7717_101.pdf",
"7717_102.pdf"
] | {"7717_101.pdf": "59db-92e0-18567213fea7.html Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career Melissa Weinman Mar 3, 2008 former University professor resigned and obtained a new job in academia before his sexual harassment investigation was completed. Timeline of Events in the Blount case 1991 graduate student accused Blount of trying to kiss her. The complaint was dropped. 1996: Four students made sexual harassment allegations against Blount. All four students dropped their complaints. 2003: An undergraduate student accused Blount of touching her inappropriately. He was found in violation of the policy. The University issued him a letter of reprimand, told him to take a sexual harassment class and eliminate interactions with undergraduates. 2003 female professor issued a sexual harassment complaint against Blount. 2004: Blount resigned before the Office of Legal Affairs completed the investigation. All parties involved in the investigation agreed not to discuss it. Anthropology professor Benjamin G. Blount left the University in May 2004 and immediately began working as a professor at the University of Texas San Antonio. Blount continues to teach there today, said James McDonald, the University of Texas San Antonio's associate vice provost. McDonald declined to speak further on this case. Blount also declined to comment. 2/22/25, 10:09 Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career | News | redandblack.com 1/5 Blount was appointed as the editor of the American Anthropologist, the flagship journal of the American Anthro-pological Association, according to the journal's March 2005 issue. Blount's 2004 resignation from the University came while the Office of Legal Affairs was investigating sexual harassment complaints levied against him. The University, Blount and the female professor who issued the complaint reached a settlement agreement on May 7, 2004. In the agreement, all parties - including the female professor who made the allegations - agreed to \"maintain the confidentiality of this agreement and the circumstances surrounding this agreement.\" The professor who filed the complaint told The Red & Black Sunday during a phone interview that it is important for cases to come to a conclusion \"for everyone's sake,\" especially for the accuser and the accused. \"It certainly would have made my life easier if the University had completed the investigation, she said. \"It created enormous stress in my job for a number of years.\" Blount resigned from the University on May 7, 2004, and the investigation was dropped. On November 24, 2003, a female professor of anthropology filed a letter with the Office of Legal Affairs detailing her account of what she described as inappropriate sexual advances from Blount. She came forward when she felt \"more professionally secure\" after becoming a full professor, according to the Office of Legal Affairs' documents obtained by the Athens Banner-Herald through an open records request. The woman said she also became aware her \"experience was not singular, and particularly distressingly that students in our department have been similarly pressured and harassed was asked by the University not to discuss the matter in writing,\" said said Sunday. The settlement stated, \"No determination has yet been made and will not be made due the resignation of Dr. Blount.\" Tom Jackson, vice president for public affairs, said employees who are found in violation of the University's harassment policy typically receive a notation in their personnel files. Jackson said he was unable to comment on the details of Blount's case. 2/22/25, 10:09 Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career | News | redandblack.com 2/5 But Jackson said he was unsure if informal resolutions - the kind of resolution Blount received - were included in employee's personnel files. Jackson was also unaware that some cases are never resolved suppose that would render it moot as far as the University is concerned,\" he said about an employee who resigns while under investigation just don't know the answer to that question.\" History of Allegations In 2003, a student complained that Blount made unwelcome sexual advances, according to the documents. The student reported on May 5, 2003 to Legal Affairs that in a May 1, 2003 meeting with Blount he \"started stroking my knee with both his hands. Then he progressed to my thigh and between my legs felt really uncomfortable, so crossed my legs.\" The student told Legal Affairs that Blount said he would be doing research on the Georgia coast, and \"he asked whether could go to by the Ga Coast to see him.\" The student said she told him she would not visit. According to documents, the student said when she left Blount's office \"he hugged and kissed me on both cheeks. While he hugged me felt he held me tight for 3-4 seconds and could feel his hands touching my behind.\" On May 20, 2003, Blount denied the charges. He responded after Kimberly Ballard-Washington, then associate director of Legal Affairs, contacted him about the charges. He wrote in a May 20, 2003 e-mail that he had \"no idea what this could be about, and categorically deny that have done anything wrong,\" according to documents. The Office of Legal Affairs issued a resolution, stating Blount was found in violation of the policy on June 20, 2003. The resolution states: \"Dr. Blount denies that he engaged in any harassing conduct with you. My findings, however, are that Dr. Blount has violated the University's Sexual Harassment Policy have therefore entered into an informal resolution with Dr. Blount.\" The first complaint against Blount was filed on Feb. 12, 1991 by a graduate student in linguistics. She wrote in a letter to the Department of Anthropology and Linguistics that Blount tried to kiss her during a casual conversation, according to documents. 2/22/25, 10:09 Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career | News | redandblack.com 3/5 She said she believed, \"his actions were not innocent.\" Though she did not wish to pursue the issue further, she said it needed to be brought to attention, because: \"something of a similar nature may happen again to someone else, with more serious consequences,\" documents state Feb. 1, 1996 document from the Office of Legal Affairs stated there were four allegations of sexual harassment against Blount, but none of the women wished to pursue formal charges. Susan Jones, then the associate vice president for Legal Affairs, wrote in response that \"we will be req'd to take action (though tenure revocation process if necessary) if further incidents occur.\" Punishment Jones advised on Feb. 1, 1996, Blount's superiors meet with him, give him a copy of the harassment policy and tell him the University views \"the matter very seriously,\" documents show. When Blount was found in violation of the policy in 2003, Legal Affairs wrote a letter to the student who complained. The letter stated Blount would \"receive a letter of reprimand from Dr. Wyatt Anderson, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences,\" and \"attend a sexual harassment training class ... If no class is available prior to November 20, 2003 he will review the sexual harassment training video.\" But Blount never attended a workshop. \"Since neither was informed about a workshop nor saw any notice or advertisement of one checked out a video, as instructed,\" he wrote Nov. 17, 2003 in a letter to the Office of Legal Affairs. Next Steps The female professor who issued a complaint in 2003, said many universities deal with sexual harassment cases well. She said hiring an official to deal solely with sexual harassment complaints, as members of the University community have suggested, is \"a very good idea ... It's hard for the administration to deal with these things.\" She is no longer employed by the University but said harassment was not the reason she left. 2/22/25, 10:09 Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career | News | redandblack.com 4/5 left for another job. The case was not the reason left, and in every other way was a model employer, and the deans and department heads worked with were universally supportive and professional,\" she wrote to The Red & Black in an e-mail Sunday. \"However, given the enormous amount of stress this has caused me and my family over a number of years, it did make the decision easier.\" She said she decided to come forward after hearing that a number of students had filed complaints against him as well. \"It's very unlikely that it's only you,\" she said about sexual harassment. It would have been \"inexcusable not to act in my mind.\" 2/22/25, 10:09 Sexual harassment allegations don't hinder professor's career | News | redandblack.com 5/5", "7717_102.pdf": "dae6-50da-9156-8b5fda8e781b.html Report: Harassment allegations follow ex-University professor to Texas Staff And Wire Reports Mar 6, 2008 Benjamin G. Blount, a former University professor of anthropology who resigned in the wake of a sexual harassment investigation against him, harassed a female graduate student while working at his new university, according to a newspaper report. The San Antonio Express-News reported Thursday that Blount, while a full professor at University of Texas San Antonio, harassed a female graduate student in 2006, causing the university to slice his salary in half and take him out of the classroom. \"If am guilty of anything argue it is showing affection excessively and not any kind of harassment,\" Blount told the Express-News. \"You can't do that now with younger students. Behavior that had been acceptable for most of my career became unacceptable, and it took me a little while to figure that out.\" According to the newspaper, in July 2006, UTSA's Office of Institutional Diversity discovered Blount sexually harassed a graduate student under his supervision. While on a dinner with Blount to discuss her marital difficulties, and later at his home him to continue the discussion, Blount tried to kiss her twice and asked her to stay the night, according to documents. Blount admitted that he went to dinner with the student, but denies he asked her to stay. When she got up to leave, the newspaper reported, Blount said put my arm around her and kissed her, it had nothing to do with sex, it was a reassuring kiss, kind of on the side of the lips. The next day she came to see me and we talked briefly and we both agreed that it was something we should not repeat and we should return to strictly academic matters.\" The Athens Banner-Herald reported Sunday that Blount, while at Georgia, resigned in 2004 after a female professor of anthropology filed a letter with the Office of Legal Affairs detailing her account of what she described as inappropriate sexual advances from him. It was the fourth complaint against Blount going back to 2/22/25, 10:09 Report: Harassment allegations follow ex-University professor to Texas | News | redandblack.com 1/2 1991. Blount chose to resign before the investigation was complete. The professor who filed the complaint told The Red & Black Sunday during a phone interview that it is important for cases to come to a conclusion \"for everyone's sake,\" especially for the accuser and the accused. \"It certainly would have made my life easier if the University had completed the investigation, she said. \"It created enormous stress in my job for a number of years.\" In 2003, a student complained that Blount made unwelcome sexual advances, according to the documents retrieved by the Banner-Herald. The student reported on May 5, 2003 to Legal Affairs that in a May 1, 2003 meeting with Blount he \"started stroking my knee with both his hands. Then he progressed to my thigh and between my legs felt really uncomfortable, so crossed my legs,\" according to the documents. The Red & Black reported Monday that Blount left the University and immediately started working at as a full professor in the anthropology department. While there he was named to the faculty grievance committee, and was appointed as the editor of the American Anthropologist, the flagship journal of the American Anthro-pological Association, according to the journal's March 2005 issue. After the allegations at UTSA, Blount said he proposed his own punishment, according to the Express-News story. The newspaper said Blount would quit teaching and interacting with students and cut his time and salary in half. His sole responsibility would be to edit American Anthropologist. But when word of Blount's troubles at reached the journal's staff last year, he resigned the editorship. Blount remains at doing research only spokesman David Gabler said is considering \"additional disciplinary action,\" but Blount said he won't resign unless the university asks him to, according to the newspaper. The San Antonio News-Express contributed to this story 2/22/25, 10:09 Report: Harassment allegations follow ex-University professor to Texas | News | redandblack.com 2/2"} |
8,296 | Marlin Chinn | Florida International University | [
"8296_101.pdf",
"8296_102.pdf",
"8296_103.pdf",
"8296_104.pdf",
"8296_105.pdf",
"8296_106.pdf",
"8296_107.pdf"
] | {"8296_101.pdf": "women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct By David J. Neal [email protected] Updated March 02, 2016 9:57 PM| Log In | Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 1/8 women\u2019s basketball team captain Destini Feagin claims first-year women's basketball head coach Marlin Chinn has been pursuing a sexual relationship with her much of the season hires Marlin Chinn to replace legendary Cindy Russo as women\u2019s basketball coach April 08, 2015 6:59 Feagin told The Herald she\u2019s reported Chinn to FIU\u2019s athletics administration, that she filed an complaint and that she unknowingly participated in a possible violation when Chinn loaned her $600 in December. Florida International University's Destini Feagin (21) gets ready to shoot during a basketball game against the Rice Owls at the Arena on Saturday, Feb. 20, 2016 [email protected] 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 2/8 The university issued a statement Tuesday afternoon is conducting an investigation into allegations made against coach Marlin Chinn. Based on the allegations, the university has suspended coach Chinn, pending the outcome of the investigation. Because this is an ongoing investigation, the university will not provide additional comments at this time plays at Alabama-Birmingham Thursday and Middle Tennessee State Saturday. The season ends next week \u2014 barring a series of massive upsets by No. 14 seed \u2014 with the Conference tournament in Birmingham. Chinn refused to comment on the allegations when reached by the Herald on Monday night, citing university policy athletic director Pete Garcia was reached Tuesday afternoon and said all comments on investigations must come from the university. The department held a mandatory meeting Tuesday morning regarding sexual harassment and coach- player relations. Chinn wasn\u2019t present, according to an source, but his assistant coaches were. Feagin, whose photo appears on the cover of FIU\u2019s season schedule, said she filed an complaint Thursday afternoon. Feagin and her mother, Joi Nicholson, say they reported Chinn to Senior Associate Athletic Director Julie Berg and to Shirlyon McWhorter director of equal opportunity programs and diversity, late Thursday afternoon. Friday night, Feagin was scratched from the team\u2019s annual Senior Night ceremony, in which all seniors traditionally participate. In earlier text messages to the Herald, Chinn said Feagin missed Saturday\u2019s game for a violation of team policy and her return was \u201cto be determined.\u201d Feagin said she committed the violation \u2014 using a teammate\u2019s Panther Bucks card to buy 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 3/8 food when her own was depleted \u2014 and Nicholson repaid the $350 owed Monday. Feagin and Nicholson assert that Chinn suspended Feagin four games \u2014 the rest of the regular season and the first game of the Conference tournament, for which holds the lowest seed \u2014 as punishment for resisting his sexual advances. Chinn, 45, is in his first season at FIU, which is 4-23, after six years as a Maryland assistant coach. The team\u2019s next game is Thursday at Alabama-Birmingham. Feagin said that inappropriate remarks from the coach started soon after he joined the team noticed he had a sexual attraction for me when he started saying perverted things to me,\u2019\u2019 she said. \u201cCommenting on my looks, my body, frame, my breasts, my behind. The way smile. He would go into detail what his sexual thoughts were. \u201cHe didn\u2019t come out and say what his intentions were at first, but he gave me hints,\u201d she said. \u201cHe said little things that alerted me. Then, he came out and told me how he felt about me.\u201d That happened in January, she said. Feagin showed The Herald screen shots of text messages she said were from Chinn (each screen shot from Feagin\u2019s iPhone had \u201cCoach Chinn\u201d in the contact spot at the top of the screen series of texts stamped July 15 read: \u201cHey Sista ain\u2019t seen u in a while!! Got to put my Good Eye on u!!\u201d with four eye emojis. 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 4/8 text stamped Dec. 18 read want you to have so much more to offer that wants to be a part of u after they get pass how good ur face and body looks!!!\u201d In late December when she needed to pay off a $500 debt on her account before registering for a class that would keep her eligible, Chinn gave her money, Feagin said. She said she figured since the money was used for school registration, there could be no violation. \u201cHe took me to the bank, gave me $600 in cash,\u201d Feagin, 22, said went to pay the debt on my account. The day after received the money, he called me said \u2018Coach, how could ever repay you was thankful, showing gratitude, humbleness really appreciated that. He said, \u2018You will pay me back. In other ways.\u2019 He said that six times. It\u2019s vivid in my head.\u201d Feagin said a few weeks later, the week of Jan. 18 as the team prepared for home games against Texas-San Antonio and Texas-El Paso, Chinn asked about her personal life. Feagin said when she casually complained about men, he replied with, \u201cOh, yeah, if had it my way, you\u2019d be my girl. If was in school, you\u2019d be my girl.\u201d After practice, Feagin said, she went back to Chinn\u2019s office to clarify what he meant and he said have sexual fantasies about you.\u201d She said during road trips she began receiving wee hours phone calls asking her to come to Chinn\u2019s room; claimed he once grabbed her posterior in a hug the 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 5/8 morning of the Feb. 6 home game against Middle Tennessee State; and once in front of assistant coaches, as she got on a bus, heard him say, \u201cOh, when you going to let me get some of that candy had no candy in my hand whatsoever,\u201d Feagin said. \u201cAt that point knew, these coaches know. They have to know. Maybe they\u2019ll say something to help stop the situation felt powerless felt like couldn\u2019t tell anybody because he would use basketball against me. And he knew how much wanted to play series of texts stamped Feb. 7 asked Feagin to go to the website \u201cThe 5 Love Languages\u201d and \u201ctake this test and screen shot me your results!! Let me see what you working with!! Answer as CAN!!!\u201d After Feagin e-mailed a statement to the NCAA, teammate Jade Cheek sent an e- mail to Feagin to use with the NCAA. Feagin shared it with The Herald: \u201cMy teammate Destini Feagin is in a situation where it seems our head coach is trying to pursue a sexual relationship/encounter with her have caught him countless of times staring at Destini even before any of this happened. As a player do not trust him anymore because wouldn\u2019t want a coach to do this to me. Other teammates and have noticed this from coach and how he looks at her.\u201d Feagin recorded a long conversation with Chinn during which they discussed the card issue. Feagin thought Chinn knew she was recording it on her iPhone. She said she didn\u2019t know Florida law requires both parties must be aware a conversation is being recorded. On the recording, which Feagin shared with The Herald, Chinn is heard saying of himself, \u201cMarried. Kid on the way. Attracted to a woman have, No. 1, no 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 6/8 business being with because I\u2019m coaching her. I\u2019m putting everything on the line because of how feel about you.\u201d During the same conversation, Chinn tells Feagin, \u201cWhen you decide that we lay down together want you to want it more than do. And I\u2019m not going to force you to do that. But that\u2019s how I\u2019ve always been. I\u2019m not going to push you.\u201d David J. Neal: 305-376-3559, @DavidJNeal This story was originally published March 1, 2016 at 1:01 PM. Today in Sports Heat. Dolphins. Marlins. Panthers. Get your daily dose of South Florida Sports By submitting agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service player and her mom say school botched handling of sexual harassment claim March 02, 2016 9:02 New women\u2019s basketball coach wiping the slate clean October 29, 2015 9:16 Take Us With You Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand. 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 7/8 Part of the McClatchy Media Network Start a Subscription Customer Service Edition Vacation Hold Pay Your Bill About Us Contact Us Newsletters Archives Sports Betting Banking Coupons McClatchy Advertising Place an Ad Place a Classified Ad Place an Ad - Celebrations Place an Obituary Staffing Solutions Political | Advocacy Advertising 2/22/25, 10:10 women\u2019s basketball coach suspended after alleged sexual misconduct | Miami Herald 8/8", "8296_102.pdf": "student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct University asking for patience during investigation Paradise Afshar Published: March 4, 2016 at 10:01 Tags: National, News 3 warnings and an advisory in effect for 4 regions in the area Destini Feagin and head coach Marlin Chinn Athletics / YouTube 2 Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 1/10 COUNTY, Fla Florida International University student who accused women's basketball head coach Marlin Chinn of sexual misconduct was suspended from the team last month, according to a school news release. Destini Feagin was suspended from the team Feb. 23, the release said said school police began a criminal theft investigation involving a student-athlete Feb. 15. \"Based on information provided to the Athletic Department on Feb. 22, the student-athlete was suspended from the women's basketball team the following day,\" the release said. \"Subsequently, the student-athlete reported serious allegations against an employee. Investigations have already started under Title guidelines and by-laws.\" Advertisement Recommended Videos Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 2/10 Feagin, a senior, claims that Chinn had been pursuing a sexual relationship with her during the season. She has also filed a complaint with the alleging that Chinn loaned her $600 in December, a possible rules violation. Feagin told the Miami Herald that she and her mother reported Chinn to school officials Thursday. \"We want to reiterate that at there is no tolerance for misconduct by an employee or a student,\" the release said. \"We will pursue the truth to the best of our abilities while supporting the victims and ensuring due process for all involved is asking for patience as law enforcement investigates. Copyright 2016 by Local10.com - All rights reserved. Advertisement Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 3/10 Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 4/10 Marketplace Sell Your Items - Free to List Visit Full Marketplace Duluth Trading Men's Button Mock- Neck Jacquard Fleece Sweats... $34 E. | sellwild.com Baby Female Border Collie Bicolor A. | sellwild.com GIFT: Apple AirPod 2nd Generation $100 W. | sellwild.com #1 3D Scanner Pop 3 $500 W. | sellwild.com Tom\u2019s Shoes 6.5 Silver /Rainbow $14 R. | sellwild.com Large Adidas Mens Black Pullover Hoodie Sweatshirt DQ3096 $24 B. | sellwild.com Powered by Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 5/10 CLICK2PINS! Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 6/10 robertkegel01 Princess Brittney & Fur Baby Bolt Write Comment.. Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 7/10 robertkegel01 Precious Princess Brittany Begley Beautiful Baby Write Comment.. Recommended Videos CLICK2SAVE Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 8/10 Upgrade your travel and beauty routine with these Insider Deals It\u2019s still only $65 to get a 1-year Costco Gold Star Membership, but now it comes with $20 to spend Omne Results Logo Listings Email Newsletters Feeds Contests and Rules Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 9/10 Contact Us Meet the Team Careers at Closed Captioning / Audio Description Public File Current Report Terms of Use Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Info Applications Cookie Preferences If you need help with the Public File, call (713) 778-4745. At KPRC, we are committed to informing and delighting our audience. In our commitment to covering our communities with innovation and excellence, we incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to enhance our news gathering, reporting, and presentation processes. Read our article to see how we are using Artificial Intelligence. Copyright \u00a9 2025 Click2Houston.com is managed by Graham Digital and published by Graham Media Group, a division of Graham Holdings. Advertisement 2/22/25, 10:10 student suspended from team before accusing coach of misconduct 10/10", "8296_103.pdf": "Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? TOPICS: Allegations Beacon Editorial Editorial Athletics Email Student Media Editorial Board Head Coach Marlin Chinn Sexual Misconduct Sports 10, 2016 Tweets by @_PantherNOW \u2026 2/22/25, 10:10 Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? - PantherNOW 1/5 Friday, March 4, the University sent an email to all students concerning recent allegations of sexual misconduct on the behalf of Head Coach Marlin Chinn. While the email touts the University\u2019s responsibility to students, faculty and staff, the content fails to live up to said responsibility. The email hides what this editorial board sees as an attempt to smear the reputation and jeopardize the credibility of the student who made the report against Chinn between claims of fairness and due process Police opened a criminal theft investigation involving this student-athlete on or about February 15. Based on information provided to the Athletic Department on February 22, the student-athlete was suspended from the women\u2019s basketball team the following day,\u201d read the email. \u201cSubsequently, the student-athlete reported serious allegations against an employee.\u201d While we cannot speculate or proclaim the guilt of either party involved, we can condemn the University for its poor decision to release this information, simply because it presents a distraction from the issue at hand. The University has nothing to gain from announcing the criminal investigation. The inclusion of this information in the email implies that the student filed her complaint to deflect from the criminal investigation she is involved in. It is a case of attempts to discredit an alleged victim of sexual misconduct, and a representation of a larger societal shortcoming. Being that this editorial board is majority female, this subject hits close to home. Too often the credibility of the accuser is challenged long before and after that of the accused. Discrediting the alleged victim is a common tactic for defense attorneys. It\u2019s taking a blatant stand and 2/22/25, 10:10 Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? - PantherNOW 2/5 removing objectivity as opposed to bringing awareness to \u201ckey facts.\u201d The University has a responsibility to be a safe-haven for its community to report sexual misconduct free from worry of smear tactics. It would have been better for the University to handle each case on an individual level until they are resolved before using one to suggest the alleged victim might be a criminal \u2013 therefore a liar \u2013 while both cases are being investigated. It is the unanimous opinion of this editorial board that the University failed its community with this email. It is our hope that, in the future, the University refrains from such tactics and remains fair, unbiased and supportive of alleged victims. Image courtesy of Flickr: 561/in/photolist-ax2H56-dqk2ti-dqk2Rn-ddsB8P-dqke63- dqkddY-dPUGS5-dPUNq1-dqk5A9-aFSskk-dKg6Ew- dPUJWY-dqk76v-dqjXDB-dPP8fV-dPPdXV-dqjVAg- dqk8zd-ntpynm-nCFp2T-dqk4bH-dqkd7J-dqjXqe- dPUGFL-8RS4u1-nAUnij-ixpoqQ-dqk5cF-nrD57m- pBU5EW-dqk4DR-dqk16F-8ToLK5-dPP7LZ-dJ1TBz- 8RS4kq-dKg7Ss-dqjYRD-4nGMLK-nAV3Up-ntoPT2- dqk6SL-dqk9FS-aFStjc-dqk2yx-dqkaUh-5LMU1W- nAUjNv-dPUPm5-dqk4xx About Post Author 2/22/25, 10:10 Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? - PantherNOW 3/5 Panther forward dunks over setbacks for second chance Miami\u2019s club scene makes whole city look bad Letter to the editor response to in D.C. editorial The University\u2019s lack of team spirit Editorial Subscriber See author's posts \ue900 \uf053Previous post Next post Student Media at Florida International University Student Media includes PantherNOW Magazine and 2/22/25, 10:10 Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? - PantherNOW 4/5 PantherNOW.com, which are edited and produced by students at FIU. We publish every Wednesday during the regular academic year. We also publish daily online content. The Roar (WRGP) is the student-run radio station, which operates 24 /7 on 95.3 in Miami, 96.9 in North Miami and 88.1 in Kendall/Homestead area. \u00a92016 2/22/25, 10:10 Student Thoughts: Head Coach Marlin Chinn awareness or allegation? - PantherNOW 5/5", "8296_104.pdf": "Mother feels 'failed' daughter in sexual harassment case Per the Miami Herald, Destini Feagin and her mother Joi Nicholson feel Florida International University has not handled their claims properly on Feagin being sexual harassed. Feagin filed a case against her head coach Marlin Chinn for his inappropriate remarks toward her. By Rene' Kennedy Mar 3, 2016, 12:50pm It was reported a few days ago; a sexual harassment case has been filed against head coach Marlin Chinn at by his player, Destini Feagin and her mother, Joi Nicholson. Due to 300 a women's basketball community 2/22/25, 10:10 Mother feels 'failed' daughter in sexual harassment case - Swish Appeal 1/2 the way the athletic department handled the allegations brought against him, Feagin and Nicholson feel the university has mishandled the claims they have made. As reported by the Miami Herald, the sexual harassment allegations were made; however, Chinn was still able to coach the following game, and no action was made to suspend him until the Monday after the game. Even further, the school did not announce his suspension until hours before Feagin's story broke with the Herald. While there has been a meeting with Senior Associate Athletic Director Julie Berg and Shirlyon McWhorter director of equal opportunity programs and diversity, Feagin feels the meeting with Berg only happened because of the random running into President Mark Rosenberg at a basketball game. She shared with the Miami Herald, President Rosenberg took notice of something being off with her and further investigated where he then contacted Berg for her. Feagin shared with the press she had attempted to reach Berg, only to be ignored until the president stepped in. There still has not been a meeting with the athletic director Pete Garcia. Nicholson shared with the Herald after the conversation with Berg, she didn't take the allegations serious, yet was trying to \"sweep the situation under the rug\" as she did not apologize for what she heard Feagin share, yet came off as if she (Berg) was in \"denial of what was shared.\" Through a source at the university, it was shared in the Herald's first story on the situation, following the allegations a there was a mandatory meeting for all athletic employees to address counseling available for them, what sexual harassment is, and the proper relationships for coaches. Chinn was not present at the meeting due to being suspended; however, his coaching staff was. Nicholson concluded her interview with the Miami Herald sharing, \"So feel like the university has failed my daughter, but the university has failed me as a parent. Because, even though she's 22 left them governing my child. Meanwhile, there hasn't been any governance. She's been mishandled, misused and sexually harassed by an authority figure you're supposed to trust.\" 2/22/25, 10:10 Mother feels 'failed' daughter in sexual harassment case - Swish Appeal 2/2", "8296_105.pdf": "a 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 1/7 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery federal judge from the Southern District of Florida has dismissed, in part, the complaint of a student-athlete who sued the Florida International University Board of Trustees (FIU) and others, alleging that she was sexually harassed by the school\u2019s head basketball coach. While ruling for the defendants, the court did leave the door open for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint. This case arises out of Destini Feagin\u2019s allegations that she was sexually harassed by Head Coach Marlin Chinn while she was a student-athlete attending the University during the 2015-2016 academic year. The University hired Chinn to be head coach of the basketball team, of which Feagin was a member, in April 2015. Soon after Chinn\u2019s player-coach relationship with Feagin began in June 2015, Chinn began allegedly asking Feagin for details about her love life, including who she was dating and the type of men she was interested in. Chinn started giving Feagin unsolicited and unwanted advice on ways to please men, telling her she needed to be \u201copen-minded,\u201d perform oral sex, give massages, and cook good meals, according to the complaint. Around that time, Chinn announced that Feagin would be team captain and that she would be featured in promotional materials published by the University. In December 2015, Chinn allegedly began making sexual remarks about Feagin\u2019s body. Also toward the end of 2015, Chinn gave Feagin $600 to pay for remedial academic sessions, and when Feagin thanked him, he responded by implying that he expected his payback to be sexual in nature month later, Chinn explicitly told Feagin that he was having sexual fantasies about her and that he wanted to have a sexual relationship with her, according to the complaint. Shortly thereafter, when the team was staying in a hotel for an away game, Chinn tried convincing Feagin to come to his hotel room under the pretense of discussing basketball. The plaintiff further claimed that Chinn\u2019s unwelcome pursuit of Feagin continued into February 2016. He would make sexual remarks to Feagin, both in conversation and via text message, and would regularly slap and touch her buttocks during basketball games, according to the complaint. On one occasion, when Feagin was alone with Chinn in his office, Chinn hugged her, and then, without her Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery Mar 3, 2017 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 2/7 consent, kissed her neck and put his hands on her buttocks and vagina. On another occasion, Chinn allegedly asked Feagin, in the presence of assistant coaches, when she would \u201clet [him] get some of that candy.\u201d After an incident in which Feagin used a teammate\u2019s meal card without permission, Chinn threatened to remove Feagin from the basketball team, telling Feagin that she would have to have sex with him whether she was on the team or not, but that it might be more appropriate if the player-coach relationship was over. Allegedly fed up with the behavior, Feagin complained to Mark B. Rosenberg, the President of FIU, Julie Berg, the Senior Associate Athletic Director of FIU, and Shirlyon McWhorter, the Title Coordinator of FIU, about Chinn\u2019s conduct. The University responded by engaging in a pattern of retaliatory actions against Feagin, including cutting her from the basketball team and excluding her from an end-of-the-season dinner honoring the players, according to the complaint. Meanwhile, Chinn continued coaching the basketball team through the end of the season, at which point he was terminated, but only after news of his sexual harassment was reported in the media. The plaintiff sued on Oct. 13, 2016, naming Chinn, Rosenberg, Berg, McWhorter, and FIU, as well as Pete Garcia, the athletic director of FIU, and Tiara Malcolm, the assistant coach of the women\u2019s basketball team, as defendants. Feagin asserted claims of sexual discrimination arising under Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq. (Counts and II) and 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 (Count III), as well as common law claims of negligence (Count IV), negligent hiring (Count V), negligent supervision (Count VI), negligent retention (Count VII), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count VIII), and battery (Count IX). Feagin sought a declaration that the defendants\u2019 conduct violated the United States Constitution, judgment in her favor as to all claims for relief, an award of compensatory, punitive, and exemplary damages, and reasonable attorney\u2019s fees and costs. Since the assertions, Feagin has voluntarily dismissed without prejudice all defendants except the Board. The Board moved to dismiss on Nov. 14, 2016, arguing dismissal is appropriate regarding all claims except for Counts and II, which relate to alleged violations of Title IX. In the response filed on Dec. 19, 2016, Feagin voluntarily asked the court to dismiss without prejudice Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, leaving only the battery count and the Title counts. \u201cBecause the Board does not move for dismissal of the Title Counts, however, the only question \u2026 at this time is whether dismissal is appropriate with regard to the battery count,\u201d wrote the court. Feagin alleges in the complaint that Chinn committed multiple batteries because he \u201cmade uninvited, unauthorized, offensive physical contact with [her] in that he placed his arms, hands and lips on her body.\u201d Further, Feagin claims that the Board is responsible for these alleged batteries \u201cbecause hired Chinn to be head coach of its women\u2019s basketball team, the offensive physical contact took place on FIU\u2019s campus, and Chinn was \u2018acting in his official capacity as head coach\u2019 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 3/7 when the offensive contact took place. The Board argues in its motion and reply that Feagin\u2019s claim must be dismissed because Feagin has failed to allege facts sufficient to hold it liable for Chinn\u2019s conduct under a respondeat superior theory of liability,\u201d wrote the court. The court agreed with the defendant, writing that in order to adequately allege that is liable as Chinn\u2019s employer, \u201cFeagin must allege facts showing that Chinn\u2019s wrongdoing occurred within the scope of his employment.\u201d Elaborating, it cited the standard set forth in Resley v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., 989 F. Supp. 1442, 1448 (M.D. Fla. 1997) (quoting Sussman v. Fla. E. Coast Props., Inc., 557 So. 2d 74, 75-76 (Fla. 3d 1990)): \u201cThe conduct of an employee is within the scope of his employment, for the purposes of determining the employer\u2019s vicarious liability to third persons injured by the employee, only if (1) the conduct is of the kind he was employed to perform, (2) the conduct occurs substantially within the time and space limits authorized or required by the work to be performed, and (3) the conduct is activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the master.\u201d The appeals court continued, writing that Feagin\u2019s allegations \u201csatisfy the second element set forth above. With regard to this element, Feagin claims that much of Chinn\u2019s alleged conduct occurred within the time and space limits required by his job as head coach. For example, Feagin alleges that when she was alone with Chinn in his office, Chinn kissed her neck and grabbed her inappropriately without her consent. She also alleges that Chinn would \u201croutinely\u201d touch her inappropriately during University basketball games substantial amount of Chinn\u2019s alleged physical contact therefore took place on campus and during working hours. \u201cHowever, the Court finds that Feagin\u2019s allegations fail to satisfy the first and third elements.\u201d Addressing the third element, Feagin argues that Chinn\u2019s alleged batteries were activated at least in part by a purpose to serve because certain acts\u2014such as Chinn\u2019s use of Feagin\u2019s face and likeness on promotional materials and his loan of $600 to pay for academic sessions\u2014were \u201cin connection with the sexual harassment by Chinn and obviously in support of his attempts to influence and/or force Feagin to allow Chinn\u2019s unwanted sexual advances.\u201d \u201cBut even if these specific acts had the effect of providing with some incidental benefit, for example by helping to draw crowds at basketball games or preserving Feagin\u2019s academic eligibility to participate in the basketball program, it does not follow that Chinn\u2019s alleged batteries\u2014which are based on alleged acts of touching independent from these examples\u2014were motivated, even in part, by a desire to advance FIU\u2019s interests.\u201d See Elders v. United Methodist Church, 793 So. 2d 1038, 1041 (Fla. 3d 2001) With regard to the first element, Feagin \u201chas not alleged, much less plausibly shown, that Chinn\u2019s 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 4/7 conduct was \u2018of the kind he was employed to perform.\u2019 In her response, Feagin characterizes Chinn\u2019s repeated, unwanted advances, including his alleged groping and touching, as a reflection of the \u2018manner in which Chinn performed his job duty.\u2019 The fact that Chinn allegedly committed some of these acts while he was coaching may speak to the second element, which as the Court notes above has been satisfied, but it does not make it plausible that hired Chinn for the purpose of engaging in this type of conduct\u2014or even that it was a natural consequence of the activities that Chinn was hired to carry out.\u201d See City of Green Grove Springs v. Donaldson, 348 F.2d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1965)7 (quoting Weiss v. Jacobson, 62 So. 2d 904, 906 (Fla. 1953)). In sum, the appeals court found that Feagin has \u201cfailed to allege facts that are sufficient to plausibly show that Chinn was acting within the scope of his employment when he committed the alleged batteries. Feagin has therefore failed to allege facts that are sufficient to hold the Board vicariously liable for the batteries.\u201d Destini Feagin v. Marlin Chinn, in his official capacity as former Head Coach of the Florida International University Women\u2019s Basketball Team, et al.; S.D. Fla NO.: 16-CV-24346-PCH, 2017 U.S. Dist 5414; 1/12/17 Attorneys of Record: (for plaintiff) Elizabeth Louise Parker ATTORNEY, The Law Office of Elizabeth Parker, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL; Stuart N. Kaplan, Kaplan Sconzo & Parker, P. A., Palm Beach Gardens, FL. (for defendant FIU) Eric David Isicoff, Teresa Ragatz ATTORNEYS, Christopher Michael Yannuzzi, Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg, Miami, FL. \u2190 Previous Next \u2192 Site Search by Keyword or Category Categories Select Category Search here... 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 5/7 Articles in Current Issue The Oakley v War Continues The Split Between a Coach and a Team\u2019s Boosters Can Be a Messy Divorce Washington State University\u2019s Denial of Coach\u2019s Religious Exemption Request Against Receiving Covid-19 Vaccination Found Valid by District Court FIFA\u2019s New Interim Rules in Light of Diarra: Termination Without Just Cause Appeals Court Dismisses Athletes\u2019 Claim that University Breached a Contract When It Failed to Renew Their Scholarships San Jose State University Volleyball Controversy: Legal Examination of Transgender Athlete Participation Update: Former Collegiate Football Stars Lawsuits for Retroactive Compensation Examining the NCAA\u2019s Reversal of Its Transgender Policy in the Wake of The Administration\u2019s Wrestling Fanatics: Referee Clears Gym, Legal Controversy Ensues Three Years In, Flores\u2019 Discrimination Case Against Is Stagnant And Diminished Circumventing the Transfer Portal Case Study on Xavier Lucas Lawsuit Challenges California Law that \u2018Allows Boys to Play on Girls\u2019 Sports Teams Hackney Publications Creates Client Referral Program for Sports Lawyers and Reach Legal Settlement Policy on Transgender Athletes Aided By And U.S. Soccer Inaction More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 6/7 Privacy Policy Logon Profile Contact Us Subscriber Support Copyright \u00a9 2003-2022 by Hackney Publications. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:10 Student-Athlete Who Was Sexual Harassment Victim Fails to Show College Was Responsible for Battery | Sports Litigation Alert 7/7", "8296_106.pdf": "\uf0e75 weather alerts 11:10 am Data from OpenWeatherMap.org 72\u00b0 \uf002 \uf26c Watch Now Former women's basketball player sues former coach, university over sexual harassment Destini Feagin ignored claims Menu 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 1/10 By: Katie LaGrone Posted 12:09 PM, Oct 14, 2016 and last updated 6:30 PM, Oct 14, 2016 former basketball player who, earlier this year, accused her head coach of sexual harassment has now filed a lawsuit against her former coach and several others at Florida International University. Destini Feagin filed the civil lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on Friday. She\u2019s accusing former women\u2019s basketball Head Coach Marlin Chinn of battery. She\u2019s also accusing of violating her Title rights by not properly investigating her claims that Chinn was sexually harassing her. Feagin claimed other coaches at the University observed Chinn repeatedly making inappropriate sexual advances towards her during the 2015/2016 season but those coaches did nothing to stop him. \u201cHe used his position of authority to exploit and harass Destini through text messages, through phone calls,\" said Feagin's attorney, Elizabeth Parker of Kaplan, Sconzo & Parker P.A. based in Palm Beach Gardens. \"He had the power to determine who was going to be playing on the team, what positions, In Miami Read More 00:00 02:00 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 2/10 whether or not they got playing time and most of all who got scholarships and who didn't. She was the female athlete that was under control of this coach,\" she said. 22-year-old Feagin, who attended on a full basketball scholarship, made headlines in the spring when she came out with the accusations. Feagin claimed Coach Chinn started asking her details about her love life and who she was dating. The former team captain claimed Chinn\u2019s questions evolved into sexual texts and even got physical when, she says, Chinn hugged her and kissed her neck putting his hands on her private parts. Feagin recorded a conversation she had with Chinn. In that recording, Chinn reportedly said at one point, \u201cDo you want to move forward with us? Obviously there is something there if want to risk everything. Our attraction\u2026What we have for each other\u2026Is that feeling mutual?\u201d In the federal lawsuit, Feagin is accusing several members of the school\u2019s athletic department of knowing about Chinn\u2019s behavior but ignoring it. She\u2019s also accusing the University of retaliating against her by cutting her from the team after she came forward with the claims. While an internal university investigation eventually substantiated Finn\u2019s claims of sexual misconduct by Chinn, the school maintained Feagin\u2019s removal from the team was not retaliation but the result of her stealing another student\u2019s school debit card for her own purchases. That case left her arrested by police in May and charged with credit card fraud and petit theft. \u201cDestini hopes that she will help in preventing future female athletes from being sexually exploited, sexually assaulted by coaches not only at but at every academic university in the nation,\u201d said her attorney Coach Marlin Chinn was eventually terminated this summer after Chinn admitted he violated rules by giving Feagin $600 to settle a school 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 3/10 account before she could register for classes. Chinn has denied any accusations of sexual misconduct against Feagin. This is a developing story. We are waiting to hear a response from on thelawsuit. The Contact 5 Investigators discovered right now the Department of Education has (9) active investigations into how (7) Florida Colleges/Universities handled sexual assault/harassment claims on campus. Active Sexual Assault Investigations: School Initiation Date Florida State University 4/3/2014 Full Sail University 7/20/2015 (2) University of Miami Case 1: 10/9/201 Case 2: 3/11/2016 University of South Florida 9/3/2014 Active Sexual Harassment Investigations School Initiation Date Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University 8/1/2014 American Medical Academy 9/5/2014 Embry Riddle Aeronautical University 9/19/2014 Florida State University 4/3/2014 12/23/2015 Source: Department of Education Title protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance. Title states that 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 4/10 No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Have a statewide investigative tip? Facebook Twitter Subject Your Name * First Name Last Name Your E-mail Address * ex: [email protected] Phone Number - Area Code Phone Number Tip Information * Submit Submit Now create your own Jotform - It\u2019s free! Create your own Jotform 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 5/10 Have a statewide investigative tip? Facebook Twitter Subject Your Name * First Name Last Name Your E-mail Address * ex: [email protected] Phone Number - Area Code Phone Number Tip Information * Now create your own Jotform - It\u2019s free! Create your own Jotform 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 6/10 Have a statewide investigative tip? Facebook Twitter Subject Your Name * First Name Last Name Your E-mail Address * ex: [email protected] Phone Number - Area Code Phone Number Tip Information * Now create your own Jotform - It\u2019s free! Create your own Jotform Copyright 2016 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign up for the South Florida Sports Headlines Newsletter and receive up to date information. E-mail Submit 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 7/10 Marcus Jordan, son of Michael Jordan, arrested in Central News Channel 5 West Palm Virginia police find body of 12-year-old boy believed to have News Channel 5 West Palm William T. Dwyer High School student arrested after Palm News Channel 5 West Palm Pakistan: The Cost Of Solar Panels May Surprise You(See\u2026 Paid Content: Search Ads Getting a Degree in the Might be Easier Than You Think Paid Content Degrees | Se\u2026 [Pics] World\u2019s First Surviving Septuplets \u2013 Look At Them 20 Yea\u2026 Paid Content: Journalistate At WPTV, It Starts with Listening 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 8/10 11:10 am Data from OpenWeatherMap.org 72 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 9/10 Weather Traffic News Money Sports Entertainment Life Marketplace Don't Waste Your Money Support Sitemap Do Not Sell My Info Privacy Policy Privacy Center Journalism Ethics Guidelines Terms of Use Careers Public File Application Public File Contact Accessibility Statement Scripps Media Trust Center Closed Captioning Contact Scripps Local Media \u00a9 2025 Scripps Media, Inc Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way 2/22/25, 10:11 Lawsuit ignored sexual harassment by coach 10/10", "8296_107.pdf": "1 No Plaintiff, vs CHINN, in his individual capacity and as Head Coach of the Florida International University Women\u2019s Basketball Team B. ROSENBERG, individually and as President of Florida International University GARCIA, individually and as Athletic Director for Florida International University BERG, individually and as Senior Associate Athletic Director for Florida International University MCWHORTER, Individually and as Title Coordinator of Florida International University MALCOLM, individually and as Assistant Coach of the Florida International University Women\u2019s Basketball Team Defendants. ______________________________________ Comes Now, Plaintiff FEAGIN, by and through the undersigned attorneys and hereby files her Complaint against CHINN, in his individual capacity and as Head Coach of the Florida International University Women\u2019s Basketball Team B. ROSENBERG, individually and as President of Florida International University GARCIA, individually and as Athletic Director for Florida International University BERG, individually and as Senior Associate Athletic Director for Florida International University MCWHORTER, Individually and as Title Coordinator of Florida 2 International University MALCOLM, individually and as Assistant Coach of the Florida International University Women\u2019s Basketball Team UNIVERSITY, for acts that occurred during the course and scope of their employment with Defendant, Florida International University, (hereinafter 1. This is a case that involves a pattern and practice of blatant sexual harassment and sexual assault by defendant Marlin Chinn (\u201cChinn\u201d), acting in his capacity as Head Coach of the Florida International University women\u2019s basketball team (the \u201cBasketball Team,\u201d or the \u201cTeam\u201d). This activity took place throughout the course of the 2015-2016 academic school year at defendant Florida International University (\u201cFIU\u201d), and in connection with FIU-sanctioned activities. 2. The outrageous conduct of Chinn includes, without limitation, routinely commenting on Plaintiff\u2019s physical attributes, having sexually explicit conversations with Plaintiff, sending sexually explicit text messages to Plaintiff, attempting to persuade Plaintiff to engage in sexual relations with him, both giving and withholding benefits designed in such a way as to influence Plaintiff\u2019s responses to his sexual advances, and explicitly physically contacting Plaintiff in a sexually inappropriate manner. 3. FIU, through its administration and athletic department, discriminated against Plaintiff when she complained about Chinn\u2019s outrageous conduct in connection with Plaintiff. 4. In addition to bringing claims for sexual discrimination arising under Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1681 et. seq., (\u201cTitle IX\u201d) and 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983, Plaintiff also brings claims under common law against Chinn and for battery, 3 intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring, negligent supervision and negligent retention 5. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1331 and 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1343. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff\u2019s state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1367(a) 6. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida 7. Plaintiff Destini Feagin is an adult resident of the State of Jersey and resides in Essex County, New Jersey. At the time of the incidents described in this complaint, Plaintiff was attending and residing in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Currently, and at the time of the incidents alleged in this complaint, Plaintiff is and was a student at FIU. At the time of the incidents alleged in this complaint, Plaintiff was a member of the Basketball Team, a member team of Division of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (\u201cNCAA\u201d). 8 is an educational institution receiving federal financial assistance as defined in 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(c). 9. At all times relevant to this action, Chinn resided in the State of Florida, and was employed by as Head Coach for the Basketball Team. 10. At all times relevant to this action, defendant Mark R. Rosenberg (\u201cMr. Rosenberg\u201d) was and remains the President of FIU. As President, Mr. Rosenberg had the authority to implement corrective measures on FIU\u2019s behalf for violations of Title IX. His 4 responsibilities included creating, implementing and correcting policies under Title IX, and to avoid and eliminate sexual harassment within the athletic programs at FIU. 11. At all times relevant to this action, defendant Pete Garcia (\u201cMr. Garcia\u201d) was and remains FIU\u2019s Athletic Director. Upon information and belief, Mr. Garcia hired Chinn. Upon information and belief, Mr.Garcia was present for and/or witnessed Chinn\u2019s misconduct. Upon information and belief, Mr. Garcia had actual knowledge of conduct that violated Title IX. As Athletic Director, Mr. Garcia had the authority to implement corrective measures on FIU\u2019s behalf for violations of Title IX. His responsibilities included creating, implementing and correcting policies under Title IX, to avoid and eliminate sexual harassment within the athletic programs at FIU. 12. At all times relevant to this action, defendant Julie Berg (\u201cMs. Berg\u201d) was and remains FIU\u2019s Senior Assistant Athletic Director. Upon information and belief, Ms. Berg hired Chinn. Upon information and belief, Ms. Berg was present for and/or witnessed Chinn\u2019s misconduct. Upon information and belief, Ms. Berg had actual knowledge of conduct that violated Title IX. As Senior Assistant Athletic Director, Ms. Berg had the authority to implement corrective measures on FIU\u2019s behalf for violations of Title IX. Her responsibilities included creating, implementing and correcting policies under Title IX, to avoid and eliminate sexual harassment within the athletic programs at FIU. 13. At all times relevant to this action, defendant Shirlyon McWhorter (\u201cMs. McWhorter\u201d) was and remains FIU\u2019s Title Coordinator. Upon information and belief, Ms. McWhorter was present for and/or witnessed Chinn\u2019s misconduct. Upon information and belief, Ms. McWhorter had actual knowledge of conduct that violated Title IX. As Title Coordinator, Ms. McWhorter had the authority to implement corrective measures on behalf for violations 5 of Title IX. Her responsibilities included creating, implementing and correcting policies under Title IX, to avoid and eliminate sexual harassment within the athletic programs at FIU. 14. During the 2015-16 academic year, defendant Tiara Malcolm (\u201cMs. Malcolm\u201d) was the Assistant Coach for the Basketball Team. Ms. Malcolm was present for and/or witnessed Chinn\u2019s misconduct. Ms. Malcolm had actual knowledge of conduct that violated Title 15. As Head Coach of the women\u2019s Basketball Team, Chinn enjoyed a position of authority and trust among the team members, including Plaintiff. As Head Coach, Chinn had the controlled team membership, positions, playing time and the power to grant or withhold lucrative scholarships for members of the Basketball Team. 16. Beginning in or about April, 2015 until on or about March, 2016, during the fall and spring semesters at FIU, Chinn had nearly constant contact with members of the Basketball Team, including Plaintiff. Chinn supervised the Basketball Team during daily practices, hosted numerous mandatory social gatherings for team members and made frequent after-hours contact with team members via telephone, text messages and/or internet messaging. 17. On multiple occasions, Chinn made unwanted and unwelcome verbal and/or physical sexual advances toward Plaintiff individually. These pervasive and unwanted sexual advances included, without limitation, the following: a) In or about June, 2015, at the beginning of the coach/player relationship between Chinn and Plaintiff, Chinn told Plaintiff that \u201ca little birdie told me you like older men.\u201d At about that time, Chinn made the announcement that Plaintiff would be the team captain, and face of the team on promotional materials published by FIU, despite the fact that other players on the team were more qualified; 6 b) Beginning in or about June, 2015, Chinn began constantly asking Plaintiff for details of her love life, which men she was dating and what kind of men she liked. Chinn advised her of the techniques she should be familiar with in order to please a man, which included \u201cbeing open-minded,\u201d performing \u201coral sex and massages\u201d and cooking good meals; c) In or about December, 2015, Plaintiff learned that she needed to take remedial academic sessions and Chinn \u201cloaned\u201d her $600.00 for the session fee. When Plaintiff thanked Chinn, he responded that \u201cyou\u2019re going to pay me back, trust me\u201d in a manner that clearly conveyed he expected the pay-back would be sexual in nature; d) Beginning in or about December, 2015, Chinn began routinely making sexual remarks about Plaintiff\u2019s body and, in or about the middle of January, 2016, Chinn told Plaintiff that he was having sexual fantasies about her and desired to have a sexual relationship with her; shortly thereafter, during an away game in which the team was staying at a hotel, Chinn called Plaintiff in her hotel room and tried to convince her to come to his hotel room under the pretense of discussing basketball; e) On Valentine\u2019s Day, 2016, Chinn left a message on Plaintiff\u2019s answering machine telling her that he knew she was alone and that he was thinking about her and that he hoped she was thinking about him; f) In or about February, 2016, while Plaintiff was boarding a university bus, Chinn, in the presence of assistant coaches, said to Plaintiff: \u201cOh, when are you going to let me get some of that \u2018candy\u2019;\u201d g) On or about February 6, 2016, while alone with Plaintiff in his office, Chinn hugged Plaintiff and without Plaintiff\u2019s consent kissed her neck and put his hands on her buttocks and vagina; 7 h) During university basketball games, Chinn would routinely slap and touch Plaintiff\u2019s buttocks; i) During the entire basketball season, Chinn\u2019s conversations with and text messages to Plaintiff would regularly include various, inappropriate sexual content; j) In or about February, 2016, Chinn threatened to remove Plaintiff from the basketball team for using a teammate\u2019s university meal card without permission and explicitly advised her that she would have to have sex with him whether she was on the team or not, but that it might be more appropriate if the player/coach relationship was terminated; thereafter, Chinn demanded that Plaintiff tell him whether they were going to have sex; k) In or about February 25, 2016, Chinn asked Plaintiff if she \u201cwanted to move forward with us\u201d and told Plaintiff that \u201cwhen you decide that we lay down together want you to want it more than do.\u201d l) In or about February 25, 2016, Chinn told Plaintiff that he realized he was married with a child on the way and he had no business pursuing one of his players, but that he was \u201cputting everything on the line because of how feel about you\u201d and further explaining that looking at his family history, having adulterous affairs \u201cwas in the Chinn blood;\u201d m) In or about February 25, 2016, Chinn confessed his love for Plaintiff and told her want to hold you want to hug you can show you [my love] better than can tell you;\u201d 18. On or about February 25, Plaintiff confronted Mr. Rosenberg, Ms. McWhorter and Ms. Julie Berg, Senior Associate Athletic Director to complain of Chinn\u2019s harassment. Plaintiff showed them sexually inappropriate texts received by Plaintiff from Chinn and 8 produced an audio recording of Chinn expressing his desire to have sexual relations with Plaintiff. 19 responded to Plaintiff\u2019s complaints by retaliating against her by immediately cutting Plaintiff from the Basketball Team and as a result, Plaintiff did not play in the remaining games of the season and was not permitted to attend the end of the season dinner honoring the players. Plaintiff was essentially totally erased from the Basketball Team roster. 20. Chinn, on the other hand, continued performing his normal duties as coach of the Team after February 25, 2016, despite the complaint of sexual harassment made by Plaintiff as outlined above. Eventually, only after news of his sexual harassment was reported in the media, did terminate Chinn\u2019s employment. 21. As Spring, 2016 graduation day approached had not reached any conclusion or resolution in connection with Plaintiff\u2019s sexual harassment complaints, but instead engaged in a pattern of retaliatory actions against Plaintiff designed to further retaliate against, punish, harass, intimidate, antagonize and humiliate Plaintiff. Count 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 (Title 22. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 21, above. 23 is a recipient of federal funding under Title IX. 24. From in or about April, 2015 through and including in or about March, 2016 employed Chinn as Head Coach for the Basketball Team. 25. Chinn harassed Plaintiff based on her sex by, without limitation, subjecting Plaintiff to sex-specific physical contact and language intended to humiliate, ridicule and/or intimidate by providing and withholding benefits based on inappropriate sex-related reasons. 26. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff was sufficiently severe and pervasive to 9 create what a reasonable person would consider a hostile environment in FIU\u2019s women\u2019s basketball program. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff so undermined and detracted from Plaintiff\u2019s experience in FIU\u2019s women\u2019s basketball program that it effectively denied Plaintiff equal access to FIU\u2019s institutional resources and/or opportunities. Furthermore, Chinn\u2019s harassment had a concrete, negative effect on Plaintiff\u2019s ability to participate in FIU\u2019s women\u2019s basketball program. 27. Plaintiff in fact found the environment created by Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment to be hostile and abusive. 28 had actual notice of Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff through defendants Rosenberg, Garcia, Berg, McWhorter and Malcolm, whom had the authority to implement corrective measures on behalf of FIU. 29 acted with deliberate indifference to the harassment by, without limitation, ignoring Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment and terminating Plaintiff\u2019s status as a member of the basketball team while retaining Chinn as Head Coach despite his actions. 30. As a direct and proximate result of FIU\u2019s actions, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities. 31. As a direct result of FIU\u2019s failure to implement prompt and appropriate corrective action, Plaintiff has been deprived of the rights guaranteed to her under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in violation of 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 10 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 (Title 32. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 31, above. 33. Plaintiff engaged in a protected activity by, without limitation, complaining to school officials about Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment. 34 had knowledge of the protected activity. 35 subjected Plaintiff to adverse school-related actions, including without limitation those actions set forth above. 36. There is a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse school-related actions, as set forth above. 37. As a direct and proximate result of FIU\u2019s actions, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities. 38. As a direct result of FIU\u2019s actions, Plaintiff has been deprived of the rights guaranteed to her under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in violation of 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 39. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 38, above. 40. Chinn\u2019s conduct directly and unreasonably interfered with Plaintiff\u2019s education and participation in the women\u2019s basketball program at and created an intimidating, hostile and offensive environment that affecter her psychological well-being and deprived her of the 11 rights guaranteed to her under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. 41. As a direct result of the failure of to intervene, report or prohibit the inappropriate and harassing conduct of Chinn, Plaintiff has been deprived of the rights guaranteed to her under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 42. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 41, above. 43. At all times relevant to this action and Chinn engaged in an employer- employee relationship. 44 was negligent in its hiring of Chinn. As set forth above knew or should have known of Chinn\u2019s propensity for tortious conduct, including without limitation sexual harassment. 45. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff occurred during the course and within the scope of his employment as Head Coach of the Basketball Team. 46. As a direct and proximate result of FIU\u2019s negligent hiring, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities 12 47. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 46, above. 48. At all times relevant to this action and Chinn engaged in an employer- employee relationship. 49 was negligent in its supervision of Chinn. As set forth above knew or should have known of Chinn\u2019s propensity for tortious conduct, including without limitation sexual harassment. 50. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff occurred during the course and within the scope of his employment as Head Coach of the women\u2019s Basketball Team. 51. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff occurred on FIU\u2019s campus and/or with FIU\u2019s chattels, in connection with activities that were sanctioned by or on behalf of FIU. 52. As a direct and proximate result of negligent supervision, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental, anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities 53. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 52, above. 54. At all times relevant to this action and Chinn engaged in an employer- employee relationship. 55 was negligent in its retention of Chinn. As set forth above knew or should have known of Chinn\u2019s propensity for tortious conduct, including without limitation sexual harassment. 56. Chinn\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff occurred during the course and within the 13 scope of his employment as Head Coach of the Basketball Team. 57. Chinn\u2019s conduct made him unfit to hold the position of Coach and created a danger of imminent harm to female members of FIU\u2019s women\u2019s basketball team. 58. Notwithstanding FIU\u2019s actual knowledge of Chinn\u2019s unfitness for the position of Head Coach retained Chinn and failed to take immediate and appropriate action to protect the female members of his basketball team. 59. As a direct and proximate result of FIU\u2019s negligent retention, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental, anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities 60. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 59, above. 61. Chinn engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct by his sexual harassment of Plaintiff. 62. Through his extreme and outrageous conduct, Chinn intended to cause Plaintiff severe emotional distress. 63. As a result of Chinn\u2019s extreme and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff experienced severe emotional distress. 64 is vicariously liable as Chinn\u2019s employer for his conduct. 65. As a direct and proximate result of Chinn\u2019s extreme and outrageous conduct, 14 Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities 66. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 65, above. 67. Chinn, as an employee of FIU, owed a duty of care to Plaintiff as a student at FIU. 68. Chinn\u2019s extreme and outrageous conduct unreasonably endangered Plaintiff\u2019s safety and/or caused Plaintiff to fear for her safety. 69. As a result of Chinn\u2019s extreme and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff experienced severe emotional distress. 70 is vicariously liable as Chinn\u2019s employer for his conduct. 71. As a direct and proximate result of Chinn\u2019s negligence, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities 72. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges Paragraphs 1 through 71, above. 73. On multiple occasions as alleged above, Chinn intended to make bodily contact 15 with Plaintiff. 74. On multiple occasions, Chinn abused his position of trust and confidence, in that he intentionally made uninvited, unauthorized, offensive physical contact with Plaintiff in that he placed his arms, hands and lips on her body. 75 is vicariously liable as Chinn employer for his conduct. 76. As a direct and proximate result of Chinn\u2019s unwanted harmful and/or offensive bodily contact, Plaintiff suffered damages, including without limitation, emotional trauma, mental anguish and suffering, impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, economic loss and alienation both academically and socially from school activities. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for the following relief: a. Judgment for compensatory damages; b. Judgment for exemplary or punitive damages; c. Cost of suit; d. Reasonable attorney\u2019s fees; e. Trial by jury as to all issues so triable; and, f. Such other relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and appropriate WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court: (a) Declare that Defendants\u2019 acts and conduct constituted violations of the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U. S. Constitution under 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681. (b) Declare that Defendants\u2019 acts and conduct constituted violations of the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U. S. Constitution under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1983. 16 (c) Judgment in Plaintiff\u2019s favor as to all claims for relief. (d) Award compensatory damages for the injuries Plaintiff sustained due to Defendants\u2019 conduct for all economic and non-economic damages for medical costs, pain, suffering, humiliation and emotional distress. (e) Award punitive and exemplary damages, pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, costs, and other reasonable expenses incurred in maintaining this action, and the reasonable attorney\u2019s fees and costs incurred in maintaining this action. (f) All other relief in law or equity to which Plaintiff is entitled and that the Court deems equitable, just and proper Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues within this Complaint. Respectfully Submitted this 22nd day of September, 2016 Financial Plaza 3399 Boulevard, Suite 180 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Telephone: (561) 296-7900 Facsimile: (561) 296-7919 By: /S/ Stuart N. Kaplan Florida Bar No.: 0647934 [email protected] Florida Bar No.: 0154059 [email protected] Secondary Email: [email protected]"} |
7,472 | Bruno Dalla Pozza | Northern Marianas College | [
"7472_101.pdf",
"7472_102.pdf"
] | {"7472_101.pdf": "Federal Cases ( Oden v. Northern Marianas College Decision Date 06 March 2006 Docket Number No. 00-16594.,No. 03-16802.,00-16594.,03-16802. Citation 440 F.3d 1085 Parties Meredith ODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v COLLEGE; Agnes McPhetres; John Does, 1-V; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of Regents, Defendants-Appellees. Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northern Marianas College, Defendant-Appellee. Court U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Ninth Circuit Your World of Legal Intelligence (/) United States | 1-800-335-6202 Document Cited authorities 12 Cited in 22 Precedent Map Related Page 1085 440 F.3d 1085 Meredith ODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v COLLEGE; Agnes McPhetres; John Does, 1-V; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of Regents, Defendants-Appellees. Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northern Marianas College, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-16594. No. 03-16802. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued November 1, 2004. Resubmitted February 8, 2006. Filed March 6, 2006. Douglas F. Cushnie, Saipan, MP, for the plaintiff-appellant uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Tred R. Eyerly, Honolulu, Hawaii, and F. Matthew Smith, Law Offices of Vincente T. Salas, Saipan, MP, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands; Alex R. Munson, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-00020-ARM. Appeal from the Supreme Court f the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; Demapan, Chief Justice, and Castro and Manglona, Justices, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00032-GA. Before BRUNETTI, GRABER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. GRABER, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidated appeal from two judgments in favor of Defendants Northern Marianas College, its Regents, and its President. The first appeal is from the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands (No. 00-16594). In that appeal we must determine whether the court's grant of summary judgment was proper on Plaintiff's claim that Defendants violated Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1972 by exhibiting deliberate indifference to the sexual harassment that she suffered at the hands of a College teacher. The second appeal is from a local court, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (\"CNMI\") (No. 03-16802). That appeal requires us to answer a preliminary jurisdictional question: whether, under 48 U.S.C. \u00a7 1824 ( we can consider appeals from a local court that were filed before, but remained pending after, May 1, 2004. In the appeal from the district court (No. 00-16594), we conclude that summary judgment was proper because, on this record, no reasonable finder of fact could conclude that Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's complaint of sexual harassment. In the appeal from the Supreme Court (No. 03-16802), we conclude that in light of our recent decision, Santos v. Guam, 436 F.3d 1051, 2006 118375 (9th Cir. Jan.3, 2006) ( we lack jurisdiction to decide an appeal that was filed before, but remains pending after, May 1, 2004. Accordingly, in No. 00-16594 we affirm the district court's summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and in No. 03-16802 we dismiss the appeal from the Supreme Court's decision Plaintiff Meredith Oden enrolled in music classes at Northern Marianas College in January 1996. The hour- long classes were taught by Bruno Dalla Pozza, a friend of Plaintiff's father. Plaintiff received individual instruction from Dalla Pozza; no one else was present during her lessons. The lessons took place twice a week until Plaintiff stopped attending at the end of February 1996. At first the interactions between teacher and pupil were innocuous. Dalla Pozza kissed Plaintiff on the cheek and gave her hugs. Plaintiff viewed that conduct as affectionate but not inappropriate, especially because early on it occurred in front of her father. After Plaintiff began taking classes from Dalla Pozza, however, his behavior became increasingly inappropriate and disturbing to Plaintiff. He rubbed Plaintiff's back and then moved his hands downward to touch her buttocks. On a number of occasions he kissed her on the lips and forced his tongue into her mouth. During one session he touched her breasts and rubbed his body against hers. Dalla Pozza also talked with Plaintiff about sexual topics and commented about her body. After about six weeks of attending music classes with Dalla Pozza, Plaintiff met with a college counselor, Susan Satur, and informed her of Dalla Pozza's actions. Soon thereafter Satur and another college counselor, Lynn Newport, met with Plaintiff and her father. The President of the College, Agnes McPhetres, learned of Plaintiff's allegations at the very earliest \u2014 crediting Plaintiff's father \u2014 in February 1996. McPhetres responded by assigning Satur and Newport to act as advocates for Plaintiff. They helped her drop Dalla Pozza's class. They met with her at least 14 times uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 to provide counseling. Satur helped her prepare a formal complaint charging Dalla Pozza with sexual harassment; Plaintiff filed it on March 8, 1996. Two days after Plaintiff filed her complaint, the College's Director of Human Resources met with Dalla Pozza regarding the allegations. The Director specifically informed Dalla Pozza that he was not to contact, or attempt to contact, Plaintiff in any way. Ten days after filing her complaint, Plaintiff received a letter from McPhetres stating that, in accordance with College policy, Dalla Pozza had been given a copy of the complaint, and informing Plaintiff that he had denied the charges. Because of the denial, the College explained, Dalla Pozza could not be disciplined immediately. Plaintiff was told that she had 15 days within which to request a formal hearing. She did so, and the College began to form an investigative Committee on Sexual Harassment in accordance with its policy. After filing the complaint, Plaintiff continued to attend other classes at the College. She encountered Dalla Pozza twice, on campus, while her harassment claim was pending. On the first occasion, Plaintiff was near a College snack bar when she saw Dalla Pozza across the room, and they made eye contact. She then ducked into a nearby restroom and hid in a stall few minutes later, she heard Satur, who happened to be washing her hands in the restroom, say hello to Dalla Pozza. He had stepped into the doorway of the women's restroom, apparently having followed Plaintiff there. On a separate occasion, Plaintiff passed Dalla Pozza while walking across campus. He made an unintelligible comment to her. The College's Human Resources Manual requires that a hearing be convened within 30 days after the filing of a formal complaint; that 30-day period expired on April 7, 1996. Notwithstanding that policy, the College did not hold a formal hearing on Plaintiff's complaint until January 3, 1997. Shortly after the hearing, the College's Committee on Sexual Harassment issued a written decision stating that it agreed unanimously that Dalla Pozza was \"guilty of sexual harassment toward\" Plaintiff. The Committee recommended disciplinary action, short of dismissal. McPhetres accepted the recommendation. She suspended Dalla Pozza without pay for four weeks, denied him a raise for one year, prohibited him from engaging in one-on-one instruction for two years, put him on probation for five years, and placed a letter of reprimand in his personnel file In 1998, Plaintiff filed a complaint in federal district court against Dalla Pozza, the Secretary of Education of the United States, and the College, its Regents, and its President. Plaintiff raised both federal and nonfederal claims. The court dismissed the claims against the Secretary of Education, a ruling that Plaintiff has not challenged. Additionally, the court entered summary judgment in favor of the College, its Regents, and its President, and dismissed all the supplemental nonfederal claims against those parties without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1367(c)(3) ( Acri v. Varian Assocs., Inc., 114 F.3d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) ( varian-associates-892324586) (holding that a district court has discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over nonfederal claims if it has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction). In 2000, Plaintiff proceeded to trial against Dalla Pozza jury awarded her both general and punitive damages. Following the entry of judgment on the jury's verdict, Plaintiff proceeded along two tracks. First, she timely appealed to this court, challenging the district court's summary judgment against her. The Ninth Circuit heard the appeal and issued an opinion in Oden v. Northern Marianas College, 284 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir.2002) ( vacated, 539 U.S. 924, 123 S.Ct. 2600, 156 L.Ed.2d 601 (2003). When the Supreme Court vacated that opinion it remanded the uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 To continue reading Request your trial case for reconsideration in light of Nguyen v. United States, 539 U.S. 69, 83, 123 S.Ct. 2130, 156 L.Ed.2d 64 (2003), which held that only Article judges may comprise a court of appeals panel. As in Nguyen, the Oden ( court had included an Article district judge sitting by designation. The case is now before the present panel, which consists entirely of Article judges, on remand. Meanwhile, in 2000, Plaintiff brought suit against the College in the Superior Court, asserting local- law claims arising from the sexual harassment to which Dalla Pozza had subjected her. The Superior Court dismissed the claims on the ground that the local two-year statute of limitations had run. Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the dismissal of her claims. Plaintiff timely appealed to this court before May 1, 2004. We have consolidated Plaintiff's appeal from the district court's summary judgment with her appeal from the Supreme Court We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Buono v. Norton, 371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004) ( Likewise, we review de novo the interpretation of a federal statute. Harper v. U.S. Seafoods LP, 278 F.3d 971, 973 (9th Cir.2002) ( law.vlex.com/vid/harper-v-u-s-891195393 A. District Court's Summary Judgment Under Title Title provides that no person \"shall, on the basis of sex, . . . be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a) ( It is undisputed that the College receives federal financial assistance; the issue is whether, under the governing interpretation of Title IX, the record would permit a uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 78 cases Search in 78 citing cases \uf014 Roe ex rel. Callahan v ( 884543767) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of California December 22, 2009 ...delay by school officials in dealing with alleged sexual harassment does not equal deliberate indifference. See Oden v. N. Marianas Coll., 440 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir.2006). Although the offenders were allowed to continue practicing until July 25th, 2006, the timeframe is not necessarily \"clearl...... Pantastico v. Dep't of Educ. ( United States U.S. District Court \u2014 District of Hawaii August 6, 2019 ...that a reasonable official should have known is insufficient to impose liability on the school district. See Oden v. N. Marianas Coll. , 440 F.3d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir. 2006) ; Simpson v. Univ. of Colo. Boulder , 500 F.3d 1170, 1175 (10th Cir. 2007). Courts have also held that a school distri...... Garcia ex rel. Marin v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist. ( 889526820) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of California April 16, 2009 ...respondeat superior or constructive notice,' instead demanding actual notice to an official of the defendant.\" Oden v. N. Marianas College, 440 F.3d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir.2006) (citing Gebser, 524 U.S. at 285, 118 S.Ct. 1989). Accordingly, for a student to proceed on a claim against a school ...... Brodeur v. Claremont School Dist. ( 892497787) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 District of New Hampshire June 12, 2009 ...where, instead of interviewing witnesses as dictated by its policy, defendant relied on police investigation); Oden v. N. Marianas Coll., 440 F.3d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir.2006) (finding no deliberate indifference in violating time deadlines of harassment policy), a wholesale failure to employ e...... Request a trial to view additional results uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 2 books & journal articles Search in 2 citing books & journal articles \uf014 Deposing & examining the plaintiff ( plaintiff-927370149) United States James Publishing Practical Law Books Deposing & Examining Employment Witnesses March 31, 2022 ...that requires a showing of a response that was more deficient than merely \u201cnegligent, lazy, or careless,\u201d Oden v. N. Marianas Coll. , 440 F.3d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir. 2006). Rather, a plaintiff must plead facts that support a plausible inference that the school made what amounts to \u201can officia...... \u00a74.3 Claims and Theories ( United States Torts (OSBar) Chapter 4 Torts Arising from Childhood Sexual Abuse Invalid date ...lazy, or careless, the response may be sufficient to avoid a finding of deliberate indifference. Oden v. Northern Marianas College, 440 F3d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir 2006). Attorney fees are available in Title cases under 42 \u00a71988. See the discussion in \u00a74.3-2(b)(1). \u00a74.3-2(b)(3) Federal uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 1-800-335-6202 Terms of use ( \u00a92025 vLex.com All rights reserved uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041", "7472_102.pdf": "Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of Regents, Defendants-appellees, 284 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2002) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 284 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2002) Argued and Submitted February 14, 2002 Filed March 22, 2002 Douglas F. Cushnie, Saipan, MP, for the plaintiff-appellant. F. Matthew Smith, Law Offices of Vicente T. Salas, Saipan, MP, for the defendants- appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mariana Islands; Alex R. Munson, Chief Judge, Presiding. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and UNPINGCO, District Judge GOODWIN, Circuit Judge. * 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 1/6 Meredith Oden appeals the district court's grant of summary judgement in favor of Northern Marianas College. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1291, and we affirm In January, 1996, Meredith Oden enrolled in a music course at Northern Marianas College [\"NMC\"] taught by Bruno Dalla Pozza, a teacher at and a friend of Oden's father. Shortly after beginning the course, Dalla Pozza began touching Oden in ways that made her feel uncomfortable. Over the course of the next two months, Dalla Pozza's treatment of Oden grew increasingly inappropriate, ranging from comments about Oden's physical appearance to \"forcibly kissing [Oden] on the mouth, inserting his tongue in her mouth, and grabbing and touching her body.\" In late February Oden contacted a counselor and described to the counselor Dalla Pozza's behavior. The counselor assisted Oden in preparing a complaint charging Dalla Pozza with sexual harassment. Oden filed the complaint with on March 8, 1996. Oden also informed Dalla Pozza that she was dropping his course. While the disciplinary matter was pending, Dalla Pozza allegedly harassed Oden on two additional occasions, the first of which was on April 10, 1996. Upon receipt of Oden's complaint, Agnes McPhetres, the President of NMC, assigned two school counselors to assist Oden in presenting her case before the Committee on Sexual Harassment [the \"Committee\"]. In addition to assisting Oden in documenting Dalla Pozza's harassment, the counselors also provided Oden with counseling sessions. NMC's Director of Human Resources met with Dalla Pozza to discuss Oden's allegations, specifically informing Dalla Pozza that \"he was not to attempt to contact Ms. Oden or her father by any means and that any attempts to do so could lead to disciplinary action against him by the NMC.\" Dalla Pozza denied all charges against him. On February 19, 1997, the Committee issued a written memorandum addressed to McPhetres stating that the Committee \"unanimously [agrees] that the respondent, Mr. Bruno Dalla Pozza, is guilty of sexual harassment towards the complainant, Ms. Meredith Oden.\" Although the Committee did not find that Dalla Pozza's conduct was serious enough to warrant dismissal from employment, the Committee did find that Dalla Pozza's conduct was serious enough to warrant disciplinary action. On February 25, 1997, McPhetres issued a letter to Dalla Pozza in which McPhetres agreed with the Committee's recommendation and imposed a number of disciplinary sanctions upon Dalla Pozza. 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 2/6 In April 1998, Oden sued Dalla Pozza, NMC, NMC's President, NMC's Board of Directors, and the United States Secretary of Education. Oden's second amended complaint alleged five causes of action. The only cause of action at issue on appeal is a Title sexual harassment claim, made against as an entity, for failure to control or discipline Dalla Pozza. In addressing Oden's Title claim, the district court held that the local jurisdiction's two year statute of limitations period, codified at Title 7 N. Mar. I.Code \u00a7 2503(d), had expired on April 9, 1998. Accordingly, the court found that the two alleged incidents of harassment occurring after April 9, 1996 (the earliest of which occurred on April 10, 1996) were the only incidents of harassment that remained actionable. With respect to these two incidents, the court held that Oden failed to demonstrate that was \"deliberately indifferent\" to Oden's complaint, see Gebser v. Lago Vista Indep. School Dist., 524 U.S. 274, 290, 118 S. Ct. 1989, 141 L. Ed. 2d 277 (1998) (holding that Title IX's implied private right of action will not lie in absence of school district's \"deliberate indifference\" to teacher's conduct upon actual receipt of notice thereof), and concluded that was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Ultimately, all defendants save Dalla Pozza were removed by summary judgment, and Oden went to trial against Dalla Pozza. The jury found that Dalla Pozza had sexually harassed Oden, and awarded Oden $10,000 in compensatory damages and $30,000 in punitive damages. Dalla Pozza has not appealed, and the fact of the harassment is no longer in controversy. The only issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment to on the Title claim \"We review de novo a grant of summary judgment.\" Clicks Billiards Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.3d 1252, 1257(9th Cir. 2001). The appellate court must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Id. Oden contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to on her Title claim because, under Gebser v. Lago Vista Ind. School Dist., 524 U.S. 274, 118 S. Ct. 1989, 141 L. Ed. 2d 277 (1998 was \"deliberately indifferent\" to her plight. In an attempt to demonstrate \"deliberate indifference,\" Oden expresses her dissatisfaction with NMC's handling of her allegations. She complains that the Committee's hearing did not take place until almost one year from the date that she reported Dalla Pozza's behavior to 1 2 3 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 3/6 NMC. Oden also contends that this one year delay violated NMC's own administrative procedures. Further, Oden suggests that insufficiently punished Dalla Pozza because allowed Dalla Pozza to continue teaching at NMC. Although Oden may be dissatisfied with NMC's approach to dealing with her allegations, her dissatisfaction alone does not render liable for Dalla Pozza's conduct. Title charges a plaintiff with demonstrating that an official (1) had actual knowledge of the alleged discrimination, and (2) responded to that knowledge with deliberate indifference. Gebser, 524 U.S. at 290, 118 S. Ct. 1989 (emphasis added); see also Reese v. Jefferson School District No. 14J, 208 F.3d 736, 739(9th Cir. 2000). The material facts are not in dispute. Upon receiving actual knowledge of the alleged sexual harassment took action by (1) providing counselors to assist Oden in documenting and presenting her case before the Committee; (2) providing Oden with one- on-one counseling sessions; (3) instructing Dalla Pozza to avoid contact with Oden; (4) conducting a hearing; (5) concluding that Dalla Pozza had sexually harassed Oden; and (6) imposing a number of disciplinary sanctions upon Dalla Pozza. Far from demonstrating \"deliberate indifference,\" these facts demonstrate that actively engaged in investigating and resolving Oden's allegations. Oden's strongest contention, i.e., that the delay between the date of her initial complaint, March 8, 1996, and the date of her hearing, January 3, 1997, constitutes \"deliberate indifference\" to sexual harassment in violation of Title IX, belies the record. Although there was a lengthy delay, there were also valid reasons for the delay had a number of administrative hurdles to jump, including the formation of a sexual harassment hearing committee; Oden had difficulty retaining an attorney; and Oden had relocated to the State of New Mexico. At most is guilty of bureaucratic sluggishness. We decline to equate bureaucratic sluggishness with \"deliberate indifference,\" especially where the school authorities began turning their bureaucratic wheels immediately after being notified of the alleged misconduct. Viewing the facts of this case in the light most favorable to Oden, we conclude that, as a matter of law, Oden fails to show that was \"deliberately indifferent\" to her allegations of sexual harassment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of NMC. AFFIRMED. * 4 5 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 4/6 The Honorable John S. Unpingco, Chief District Judge for the District of Guam, sitting by designation 1 Oden's first cause of action was a Title claim brought against as an entity Her second and third causes of action, which each had two counts, were brought against NMC, McPhetres in her individual and official capacity, and the members of the Board of Regents in their individual and official capacities. The first count was a 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 claim seeking damages for failure to train, discipline and control Dalla Pozza, based upon a violation of 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The second count alleged the same claim based upon common law negligence. The fourth cause of action went to trial against Dalla Pozza, and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff. The fifth cause of action, against the Secretary of Education, was dismissed by the district court for failure to state a claim. 2 Oden's Opening Brief concerns itself solely with Title IX, and asks only that this Court determine whether responded with \"deliberate indifference\" to her allegations of sexual harassment. Because Oden does not raise any other issues in her Opening Brief, we deem them waived See Milne v. Hillblom, 165 F.3d 733, 737 n. 6 (9th Cir. 1999) (declining to consider issues not raised in appellant's opening brief); Entm't Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc., 122 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir. 1997) (same). 3 With respect to the \u00a7 1983 claims brought against the defendants in their official capacities, the district court found that is an arm of the state, and therefore held that the defendants did not qualify as \"persons\" within the meaning of \u00a7 1983 See Magana v. CNMI, 107 F.3d 1436, 1443 (9th Cir. 1997). As for the \u00a7 1983 claims brought against the defendants in their individual capacities, the district court held that the defendants enjoyed qualified immunity under Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 102 S. Ct. 2727, 73 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1982). Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment to the institutional defendants on the \u00a7 1983 claims. Because it had dismissed all of the federal claims against the institutional defendants, the district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Oden's common law negligence claims. See 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1367(c). 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 5/6 4 Title provides that \" [n]o person ... shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a) 5 The district court based its decision, in part, on the Northern Mariana Islands' two year statute of limitations See Title 7 N. Mar. I.Code \u00a7 2503(d). We need not do so because, even if the statute of limitations was inapplicable, thereby making the entirety of Dalla Pozza's conduct actionable, Oden would still fail to show that was \"deliberately indifferent\" to her allegations of sexual harassment. See Smoot v. Boise Cascade Corp., 942 F.2d 1408, 1411 (9th Cir. 1991) (providing that court of appeals \"may affirm on any ground adequately supported by the record\"). Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:11 Meredith Oden, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northern Marianas College; Agnes Mcphetres; John Does, I-v; Bruno Dalla Pozza; Board of \u2026 6/6"} |
8,308 | Joe Sottolano | U.S. Military Academy | [
"8308_101.pdf",
"8308_102.pdf",
"8308_103.pdf"
] | {"8308_101.pdf": "Army baseball coach fired after sexual harassment probe Sottolano Academy's all-time leader in wins Published 2:00 a.m Sept. 25, 2013 Army baseball coach Joe Sottolano, the Academy's all-time winningest coach, was fired on Tuesday for alleged inappropriate behavior toward a staff member. Sottolano, a 1986 graduate of Minisink Valley, was terminated following a lengthy and intense in-house investigation. He had been on administrative leave for about a month after a staffer filed a sexual harassment complaint against him. Associate head coach Matt Reid was named interim coach through the 2014 season national search for Sottolano's replacement will begin this spring. \"Due to behavior that does not meet the standards of what we demand of our senior leaders and role models at West Point, we have relieved Joe Sottolano of his duties as head baseball coach,\" Army athletic director Boo Corrigan said in a release. Sottolano, 391-286-5 as Army coach, didn't return a phone call seeking comment. He often talked glowingly about the Academy's principles and its standing as an institution larger than any one player or one team. By phone Tuesday, Corrigan offered a similar analogy in reference to Sottolano's dismissal. Need a break? Play the Daily Crossword Puzzle think that there was a loss of faith in his ability to lead and in what we are looking for out of our senior leaders,'' Corrigan said, stressing that no cadets were involved in any wrongdoing. \"We have certain expectations of our senior leadership, and it's something bigger than one individual. It's about West Point and it's about our cadets.'' 2/22/25, 10:11 Army baseball coach fired after sexual harassment probe 1/3 Corrigan was asked about the effect of Sottolano's dismissal on the program, as well as the negative publicity on the Academy. \"Every program is about the athletes and the cadets,'' Corrigan said. \"Specifically, it's about the cadets. They are the ones who are going to leave their marks on the program.'' As for concerns over the negative publicity on the Academy, Corrigan said, \"The Academy has been around for 212 years and produced unbelievable leaders for this country believe in the Academy and believe in the leadership at the Academy.'' An intense, fiery player, Sottolano had a stellar scholastic career capped by being named the Varsity845 Player of the Year in 1986. He went on to record a brilliant career as a left-handed pitcher at Ithaca College. Sottolano was named the most outstanding player of the Division World Series as a sophomore in leading the Bombers to the national title. Sottolano brought some of that same fire to West Point. He was named Army assistant in 1992 and promoted to head coach in 2000 after then head coach Dan Roberts was arrested for operating a vehicle under the influence on post. Roberts was fired in March 2000. Sottolano proceeded to build Army's top high-profile program. This spring he led the Black Knights to their seventh tournament berth. Army also went to the tourney in 1997, 2000, 2004, 2005, 2009 and 2012. Yet Sottolano resisted the urge to leave for a higher-profile, better-paying job. In fact, he said last year that he had never even formally interviewed for another job. Sottolano figured he would never find a better fit, a disciplinarian with an intense, almost maniacal, passion for the game, his foundation based around mutual respect and following direction at an institution that preaches character. And he got to do it an hour from his hometown. Sottolano did a masterful job turning Army into a perennial Patriot League contender. He might have done his best work this past season after the Black Knights got off to a slow start. Army won 18 of 23 games, including eight straight, to win the Patriot tournament title and qualify for the tourney. The Black Knights (29-23), seeded last in the tourney, swept Navy and Holy Cross in best-of-three semifinal and final series. Corrigan characterized Sottolano as \"passionate about coaching. You know, fiery. He had great passion for what he did, for what he does. 2/22/25, 10:11 Army baseball coach fired after sexual harassment probe 2/3 \"He's a remarkable coach,'' Corrigan said think it's a tough day for everyone involved. But we have to do what we think is right for the Academy.'' Sottolano was put on administrative leave about a month ago after the complaint. Army opened fall practice on Sept. 3 without Sottolano. [email protected]; Twitter: @th_KevinGleason High school: Minisink Valley Class of 1986 College: Ithaca College (undergraduate 1990; graduate 1993) Coaching career: assistant at Drexel University 1990-91; assistant at Army 1992-00; head coach Army 2000-13 Record as Army coach: 391- 286-5 over 14 seasons tourney appearances: six Best season: went 41-15 in 2012, breaking Army record for wins Joe Sottolano file 2/22/25, 10:11 Army baseball coach fired after sexual harassment probe 3/3", "8308_102.pdf": "Hamas begins release of six Israeli hostages -- including 2 held for a decade Army baseball coach Joe Sottolano was fired on Tuesday after 14 seasons due to allegations of inappropriate behavior. Sottolano, who led the Black Knights to seven Tournaments as the Academy\u2019s all-time winningest coach, had been on administrative leave \u2014 while an investigation took place \u2014 after an Academy staff member filed a sexual harassment complaint against him, according to The Times Herald-Record. The U.S. Military Academy did not specify the reasons for Sottolano\u2019s termination Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations By Howie Kussoy Published Sep. 24, 2013, 6:24 p.m Family of father of 3 killed in plane crash seeking $250M in first legal action against FAA, Army More than $151M collected from Army soldiers for food ended up spent elsewhere: report Defense officials prep lists of military cuts ahead of arrival 2/22/25, 10:12 Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations 1/5 \u201cDue to behavior that does not meet the standards of what we demand of our senior leaders and role models at West Point, we have relieved Joe Sottolano of his duties as head baseball coach,\u201d Army director of athletics Boo Corrigan said in a statement. Lt. Col. Webster Wright, a spokesman for West Point, told the Associated Press Sottolano was fired for a \u201cpattern of behavior.\u201d Sottolano arrived at West Point as an assistant coach in 1992 and took over as head coach after then-coach Dan Roberts was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2000. Sottolano, a 1990 graduate of Ithaca College, compiled a record of 391-286-5 at Army, including Tournament berths the past two seasons. Associate head coach Matt Reid was named the interim head coach through the 2014 spring season army sexual harassment 9/24/13 Kidd: Nets had 'vanilla' identity last season Unlock full access to Post sports columnists and newsletters Why Alex Bregman-Rafael Devers' saga is among the most challenging in long list of battles between stars 4 Nations Face-Off makes lessons clear for Team \u2014 but can they achieve them? Don Mattingly agrees: 'Times change!' Yankees were long overdue to end farcical facial hair policy Joel Sherman Ethan Sears Jon Heyman 2/22/25, 10:12 Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations 2/5 The best insights from the ultimate insiders Up in the Blue Seats - Rangers Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify The Show with Joel Sherman and Jon Heyman Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Blue Rush Giants Football Podcast Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Gang\u2019s All Here Jets Football Podcast Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Got Game: Basketball Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Pinstripe Post - Yankees Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Against the Cage - Combat Sports Listen on Apple Podcasts Spotify Page Six 2/22/25, 10:12 Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations 3/5 Jenny Slate allegedly filed complaint while filming 'It Ends With Us' due to 'uncomfortable' interaction: report NYPost Influencer hits Elon Musk with paternity suit, seeks sole custody of 5-month-old son: court docs 2/22/25, 10:12 Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations 4/5 \u00a9 2025 Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Membership Terms Privacy Notice Sitemap Your California Privacy Rights 2/22/25, 10:12 Army baseball coach fired following sexual harassment allegations 5/5", "8308_103.pdf": "Sottolano fighting to get his job back Published 1:00 a.m Jan. 16, 2014 Former Army baseball coach Joe Sottolano, fired for alleged inappropriate behavior toward a staff member last September, has filed an appeal to be reinstated as the team's coach. Sottolano's lawyer, Michael Sussman, confirmed that the appeal has been submitted with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. Sottolano, a 1986 Minisink Valley graduate, was terminated following a lengthy and intense in-house investigation by West Point officials. \"If anyone read the press release put out by the Army Athletic Association and West Point on Sept. 24, 2013, in essence, it made very strong claims that Mr. Sottolano needed to be relieved of his duties, and behaved in some egregious manner,\" Sussman said. \"The first, from our perspective, is that's not true. His reputation needs to be repaired. They terminated him, we believe unjustly, and that's a breach of contract and unjust termination. We are seeking a reinstatement of that contract, any back pay, with interest, benefits, health insurance \u2014 that's the general remedy for breach of contract.\" Sottolano, who went 391-286-5 over 14 seasons and led Army to six tournament appearances, could not be reached for comment on Wednesday. He is the Academy's all-time winningest baseball coach. Army's executive athletic director, Bob Beretta, referred all inquiries about Sottolano to West Point's public-affairs office, which issued a statement: \"Army head coach Joe Sottolano was terminated in Sept. 2013 due to behavior that did not meet the standards of our leaders and role models at West Point. Further comment pertaining to Mr. Sottolano's ongoing litigation is inappropriate.\" Need a break? Play the Daily Crossword Puzzle. According to Sussman, under Sottolano's contract, which was set to expire after this season, he could not be removed unless he committed a breach. Sottolano made approximately 2/22/25, 10:12 Sottolano fighting to get his job back 1/2 $100,000 annually, and Sussman said his client and the Academy had discussed a five-year extension last summer. \"Army determined to breach Mr. Sottolano's contract and say that he had committed actions, unspecified actions, which allow to sever their contractual relationship with him immediately,\" Sussman said. \"He had a period of 90 days under his contract to file a (notice of appeal), which elaborates on the contention that there was a breach. He retained me to litigate the case, which is obviously that he did not do anything which would justify his termination.\" Sottolano's notice of appeal was filed on Dec. 16. After that, he had 30 days to submit his complaint, which Sussman put forth last Monday. Before being fired, Sottolano had been on administrative leave for about a month after a staffer filed a sexual-harassment complaint against him. Associate head coach Matt Reid was named interim coach through the 2014 season after Sottolano's dismissal national search for Sottolano's replacement will begin this spring. \"The accusations in which people relied upon to take this action, those accusations are without basis do sincerely believe that,\" Sussman said think there was a very big overreaction and it's very unfortunate.\" The appeals board, which will hear Sottolano's case, is a neutral, independent forum that has been in existence for more than 50 years \u2014 according to its website. Catherine Stanton, the board's general counsel, said she could not comment on Sottolano's case or give a timetable as to when it will be heard. The board, located outside of Washington, D.C., hears and decides post-award contract disputes between a variety of government agencies. Most decisions are made by a panel of three judges. According to its website, the board encourages parties to attempt to negotiate a resolution of their disputes. Sussman said that, according to Sottolano's contract, his case must first be heard by the board. If Sottolano isn't satisfied with the board's ruling, Sussman said his client could file a federal lawsuit. 2/22/25, 10:12 Sottolano fighting to get his job back 2/2"} |
7,924 | Jason Fruth | Wright State University | [
"7924_101.pdf",
"7924_102.pdf"
] | {"7924_101.pdf": "By Max Filby July 31, 2017 Wright State University education professor resigned in May amid a four-month university investigation into accusations that he raped one student and sexually harassed other students. The university\u2019s Office of Equity and Inclusion launched the investigation of Jason Fruth, 37, on Feb. 19 after a graduate student filed a complaint claiming she had been raped by the professor investigative records obtained by the Dayton Daily News show. Fruth denied the rape and harassment allegations and a criminal investigation by the Beavercreek police led to no charges. RELATED: Campus sex assaults: Previous rape case dropped; suspect wouldn\u2019t talk He was placed on paid leave on Feb. 22 and resigned on May 31, two weeks before Wright State\u2019s investigation was completed. Following her complaint to WSU, the graduate student filed a complaint with Beavercreek Police on March 2 alleging Fruth had raped her in the early hours of Jan. 1, a police report Wright State professor resigns while under investigation Investigation found inappropriate behavior between professor and students Crime Local Elections Business Investigations Opinion Life Food Sports Obituaries Classifieds Log In 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 1/7 shows. Fruth was not charged following a Beavercreek police investigation. Police told the Dayton Daily News the case is closed and the Greene County prosecutor reviewed it and declined to file charges. Wright State\u2019s investigation uncovered allegations of 29 instances in which Fruth engaged in what the university considers inappropriate behavior. Students reported to Wright State that Fruth told them they were attractive, sent messages with photos of himself shirtless, and made sexual jokes, among other things. Fruth was an assistant professor in Wright State\u2019s College of Education and Human Services. He was hired as an instructor at Wright State in September 2011 and was promoted to an assistant professor in 2016, according to documents in his personnel file. At one point in his career at the university he also served as co-director of the intervention specialist program. RELATED: 79 cases, 5 arrests, 0 rape convictions His biography, which has since been removed from WSU\u2019s website, stated that he has worked with state and federal agencies as the lead investigator on projects to end sexual violence. The graduate student who made the rape allegation was a student who worked for Fruth, according to the police report. While Fruth has not been charged with a crime, Lindsay Wight, interim director of Wright State\u2019s Office of Equity and Inclusion, concluded he broke three university policies, according to a report detailing the investigation\u2019s findings. The first violation was that he had sex with someone who was intoxicated and unable to give consent. That was the finding involving the case in which the student claimed she had been raped. The second violation was that he had a sexual relationship with a student, who he had \u201cdirect supervisory authority over,\u201d and did not report it to his superiors. Relationships where a \u201cprofessional role-based power differential\u201d exists between two people are discouraged by university policy. But policy states that if such a relationship emerges, the person in the position of power has a duty to report the relationship to their immediate supervisor. 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 2/7 The third is that he sexually harassed the student who accused him of rape as well as other students who did not work for him, creating a \u201chostile working and learning environment,\u201d according to the report. RELATED: Sexual assault reports up on area college campuses Fruth declined to comment when the newspaper contacted him in June and could not be reached to comment this week after several messages were left on his phone. Attorneys who represented Fruth at the time the March police report was filed did not return calls for comment. The student who claimed Fruth raped her declined to immediately comment on the story stating she wanted to speak to her legal representation. \u2018Frozen and unable to move\u2019 The alleged incident that led to the rape accusation against Fruth began on Dec. 31, 2016. The student who accused Fruth of rape said she and her friends had been drinking in celebration of New Year\u2019s Eve, according to the investigative report obtained through a public records request. The student said at some point in the night she and two of her friends went to Tuty\u2019s Bar and Grill in Fairborn to continue drinking and celebrating. The student texted Fruth \u201cHappy New Year!\u201d according to copies of the text messages in the investigative report. Fruth responded with three emojis of a woman dancing in a red dress and joked that it was actually an emoji of himself. RELATED: Report tracks rape reports at Wright State for first time The two texted about \u201cadding\u201d each other on the messaging app Snapchat. The student asked Fruth \u201cIf were yours, what would you do?\u201d and Fruth responded \u201cSnap me and I\u2019ll show you.\u201d The student asked Fruth to come to Tuty\u2019s because she was drunk and did not have a ride home, according to text messages in the investigative report. Fruth later told that the student \u201cexhibited sober behaviors\u201d and that she did not seem drunk. 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 3/7 Fruth picked the student up from Tuty\u2019s after midnight, telling her over text message that he drove to Fairborn from Middletown, the report shows. The student told that she was so intoxicated that a friend had to help her to Fruth\u2019s car and that she could not remember the drive home nor arriving at her apartment. Fruth though said that the student gave him directions to her apartment, according to Wright State\u2019s report. The student told investigators she recalled being in her room and Fruth taking off her dress but she said she did not remember giving him consent, according to the report. RELATED: Campus sex assaults: Many incidents reported, no prison time The student told Wright State that during sexual intercourse she felt \u201cfrozen and unable to move\u201d and recalled thinking to herself \u201cwhat is happening?\u201d Fruth told investigators that the sex was consensual. In a letter to Beavercreek police, Greene County prosecutor Stephen K. Haller said that charges would not be filed because the student could not remember if she gave consent, that there was no actual evidence she was impaired by alcohol and because she and Fruth exchanged flirtatious and sexually suggestive text messages before the alleged rape. Rape cases based on intoxication are hard to prosecute because intoxication is tough to prove unless corroborated by witnesses, said Becky Perkins, communications director for the Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence. While needing a ride home may \u201ctheoretically\u201d seem like evidence, it\u2019s difficult to show someone was intoxicated because by the time a victim usually seeks help, the alcohol has left their system, she said. \u201cThe criminal justice system is based on things that can be proven and it\u2019s difficult to prove,\u201d Perkins said. Few college sexual assault and rape cases ever end in convictions or arrests, a 2016 Dayton Daily News investigation found. Just five of 79 cases at eight Ohio universities examined by this newspaper led to arrests in 2014 and 2015, while none led to convictions. RELATED: Brock Turner case prompts calls for consent discussions 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 4/7 In 2014 and 2015, Wright State police investigated nine alleged rapes, one of which led to an arrest in 2016. Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine told this news organization last year that \u201cpeople have to understand an intoxicated woman cannot give consent.\u201d \u201cThere has to be a discussion about consent, that an intoxicated person cannot give consent,\u201d DeWine said. \u201cNot only does it need to be discussed in schools, it needs to be discussed in homes.\u201d Student worked at The student told Wright State that she hesitated to report the incident, fearing that she would lose her job because Fruth was her boss, according to a Beavercreek police report. On Feb. 19, the student notified the university that she wanted to file a complaint against Fruth. In a statement on the matter, the university said \u201cThe University\u2019s Office of Equity and Inclusion (OEI) received a complaint alleging a violation of the University\u2019s Gender-Based Harassment and Violence Policy. In accordance with policy, the promptly conducted and completed an investigation concerning the complaint.\u201d RELATED: Miami University facing 2 new federal probes over handling of sexual assault cases Following her encounter with Fruth on New Year\u2019s Eve, the student told Wright State officials he made her feel uncomfortable on other occasions. In mid-January, the student told Fruth via text message that she had not been paid for her work and he offered to pay her out of his own pocket. The student declined the offer, according to text messages between her and Fruth that were compiled in Wright State\u2019s investigative report. She also told the investigator that Fruth would assign her tasks that would require her to come to his office. She became so uncomfortable with the requests that she made up excuses and asked other people to complete the tasks, according to the report. 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 5/7 The student told that Fruth had previously sought a relationship with her when she was a sophomore at Wright State. The student said Fruth told her \u201cthat he would like to see her in her underwear, told her repeatedly that she was pretty, asked her how someone like her was single, and told her that he would treat her better than anyone her own age.\u201d RELATED: More male students filing lawsuits alleging unfair sexual assault claims One time when the student was at a North Carolina airport, she texted Fruth to let him know she was stuck at the airport and would not be able to attend his class, according to the report. Fruth called her and said he had ordered her a car to take her to a hotel he had paid for. The student told investigators she considered that a \u201cweird gesture\u201d and said she did not have much more contact with Fruth as an undergraduate, according to the report. Fruth told Wright State that such gestures for his students were not out of the ordinary for him to make. He also said he once helped a female student pay to have her car fixed so she could get to class, according to the report. Other allegations Wright State\u2019s investigation also examined a sexual relationship Fruth allegedly had with another student. Fruth was accused of having sex with a student in his university office, though he denied the allegation, according to WSU. The student confirmed she had a relationship with Fruth but declined to be interviewed for WSU\u2019s investigation, according to the report. While Fruth denied having sex with a student in his university office, three witnesses stated that he had. RELATED: Feds reach agreement with Wittenberg U. on sexual assault complaints In 2014, a different student accused Fruth of sexual harassment but did not want to file a formal complaint with the office of equity and inclusion, according to the report. The report does not say whether Fruth contested the allegation. 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 6/7 That student requested that the university address the issue with Fruth \u201cso as to prevent this from happening to someone else.\u201d The student told Wright State that Fruth invited her to lunch off campus and while she was in a car with him, he touched her leg and made inappropriate comments, according to the report. The director of Wright State\u2019s office of equity and inclusion spoke to Fruth following the alleged 2014 incident and thought that the discussion was \u201ceffective in stopping the objectionable behavior with respect to\u201d the student, according to the report. While no formal complaint was filed against Fruth in 2014, spokesman Seth Bauguess said the office of equity and inclusion\u2019s meeting with him was documented. Dayton Daily News staff writer Josh Sweigart contributed to this report. In Other News 1 Man dead after police shooting in Piqua 2 DETAILS: 21-year-old killed in officer shooting in Miami Twp. 3 Man accused of breaking into ex\u2019s Dayton home, shooting her charged... 4 Trotwood man guilty of crash that seriously injured teen 5 Thug Riders Motorcycle Club member pleads guilty to conspiracy About the Author Max Filby 2/22/25, 10:12 Wright State professor resigns amid four-month investigation 7/7", "7924_102.pdf": "Quotable... \u201cBe proactive not reactive, for an apparently insignificant issue ignored today can spawn tomorrow's catastrophe.\u201d -- Ken Poirot Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your browser. Case in Point: Lessons for the proactive manager July 2017 Vol. 09 No. 07 Proactive (adjective) - serving to prepare for, intervene in, or control an expected occurrence or situation, especially a negative or difficult one; anticipatory. (source: For over nine years we've published this newsletter at the end of each month with the intent to improve risk management at Auburn University (and throughout higher education). Specifically, we've called for you to become a proactive risk manager. For the next two months, we want to delve more into what we mean by the phrase ''proactive risk management.'' The Beginning: Objectives We believe the first place to begin is by considering our objectives, those things we hope to help accomplish. In our industry, these will largely fall into broad categories of teaching, research, or outreach. Objectives come in various shapes and sizes, from those that are strategic to those that are transactional. Your specific role will determine which types of objectives you are responsible for helping accomplish. 1. What is it we are trying to accomplish? 2. What does success look like with respect to this objective? The Next Step: Evaluation After we consider our objectives, the second step in becoming a proactive risk manager is to evaluate what could prevent us from being successful. Sometimes risk assessment can sound complicated, but at its heart are a couple of very simple questions: 1. What could prevent us from being successful in accomplishing our objectives? 2. Of the things that could prevent us from being successful, which are the most likely to actually happen? 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 1/9 In August, we will continue our discussion with what happens next in proactive risk management. One way you can improve your risk evaluation is by looking at the stories listed below and thinking about whether similar issues could prevent success at AU. As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions. M. Kevin Robinson Associate Vice President Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy Information Security & Technology Events Jul 25, 2017: Information on about 2,300 patients at the University of Vermont Medical Center was accessible to hackers after two employees fell victim to a phishing scam in late May and early June, the hospital said. No patients' Social Security numbers or financial records were exposed, the hospital said in a statement Friday. But the compromised accounts contained \"messages with patients' information, which may have included names, addresses, medical record numbers and clinical information, such as diagnosis, treatment, and medications.\" (link) Jul 25, 2017: The University of Mississippi Medical Center has agreed to pay a $2,750,000 fine levied by the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights to settle several violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The breach goes back to March 21, 2013, when UMMC's privacy officer discovered a password-protected laptop was missing from UMMC's Medical Intensive Care Unit and notified OCR. (link) Jul 20, 2017: Brigham Young University is warning several hundred present and former students about a data breach that may have compromised students' personal information. The data breach originally occurred on June 10 when a server at was accessed by an unauthorized source. At the time of the breach it appeared that no personal information was compromised, but upon further review investigators found that the server accessed contained a file with the personal information of 800 former and current students. (link) Jul 11, 2017: University of Iowa Health Care has notified 5,300 patients that a \"limited set of data containing protected health information\" was posted online for two years. Back in May 2015, the private health information -- including patient names, dates of admission, and medical record numbers -- was inadvertently saved in unencrypted files and posted online through an application development site that others could see, according to UIHC. (link) Jul 06, 2017 Davis Health is notifying approximately 15,000 patients of a security breach after an employee fell prey to an email phishing scam. Despite the breach, the company says there is no indication that any personal or medical information was taken. As a precaution Davis Health says it's providing credit and identity protection to people whose information was stored in the system. (link) Fraud & Ethics Related Events 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 2/9 Jul 31, 2017: In June 2016, investigators at the University of Georgia (UGA) in Athens concluded that Azza El-Remessy, a faculty member who studied the impact of diabetes on the eye, had committed misconduct and recommended she be terminated. El-Remessy hired a lawyer to dispute the findings, but the following October she gave up her challenge after the university paid her $100,000 --essentially to leave. (link) Jul 27, 2017 woman accused of embezzling from Northwestern Michigan College has been arrested and charged. Michelle Schneider was arraigned Thursday on one charge of embezzlement agent of more than $1,000 but less than $20,000. According to court records, Schneider was a former employee of in the Education Media Technologies department and was terminated on March 27, 2017 for misuse of her issued credit card and embezzlement from NMC. (link) Jul 25, 2017 Virginia woman accused of taking hospital patients' information has pleaded guilty to identity theft. Forty-one-year-old Angela Roberts of Stephenson, Virginia, entered the plea Monday in federal court in Martinsburg. According to her indictment, Roberts obtained names, Social Security and driver's license numbers and other sensitive information from the patient database of her employer Medicine University Healthcare in Martinsburg. (link) Jul 21, 2017: The investigations into money mismanagement continue at the University of New Mexico. This, after the Director was fired last month, accused of taking trips that never got approved, paying for lunches on the university's dime, then lying about it all. Alma Rosa Silva- Banuelos worked with the university's Resource Center since 2010. She was promoted as the center's program specialist in 2012. (link) Jul 19, 2017: Texas A&M's outgoing Provost and Executive Vice President Karan Watson has been removed from her position after an internal audit found significant conflict of interest issues tied to business dealings her spouse had with the university, according to documents obtained by The Eagle. The investigation is likely to trigger sweeping changes throughout System universities and agencies by prohibiting spouses and close family members of senior administrators from doing business with the System. (link) Jul 18, 2017: Prosecutors say a project manager at the University of South Carolina funneled $420,000 worth of grant money to himself over seven years. The state grand jury indicted 48-year- old Blake Langland on five counts relating to public corruption in an indictment made public Tuesday. The indictment says Langland works at the university's Electrical Engineering Department. (link) Jul 14, 2017 Lawrence man has been charged with burglary and theft after allegedly stealing $13,000 worth of items from a lab at the University of Kansas. Matthew C. Reynard, 37, was charged Tuesday in Douglas County District Court with one count of burglary and two counts of theft, all felonies. Reynard is accused of taking a veterinary camera, a camera control unit, syringes and hypodermic needles belonging to from Malott Hall on June 24, according to the charges. (link) Jul 11, 2017 supervisor in the accounts payable department at Hamline University accused of orchestrating an elaborate fraud scheme admitted to the conduct in court this week. Teresa Garin, 51, of St. Paul pleaded guilty Tuesday to one count of felony-level theft by swindle, court records say. Garin stole more than $150,000 from the school by creating fake vendor accounts and cashing checks issued by the university into her personal bank account, according to criminal complaints. (link) Jul 07, 2017 Houston Community College trustee faces up to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to bribery, federal prosecutors said Friday. At Christopher W. Oliver's plea hearing, it was revealed in open court that he had met with another person on several occasions at restaurants 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 3/9 and coffee shops in Houston. Oliver admitted accepting cash in exchange for promises to use his position to help another person secure contracts with HCC, the news release said. (link) Jul 06, 2017 longtime employee of Southeast Community College's Milford campus was fired last November after it was discovered she stole more than $20,000 from the college. On Thursday, Stephany A. Canning, 58, was charged with one count of felony theft of more than $5,000 in Seward County Court following an investigation involving the Nebraska State Patrol. (link) Compliance/Regulatory & Legal Events Jul 31, 2017 Wright State University education professor resigned in May amid a four-month university investigation into accusations that he raped one student and sexually harassed other students. The university's Office of Equity and Inclusion launched the investigation of Jason Fruth, 37, on Feb. 19 after a graduate student filed a complaint claiming she had been raped by the professor investigative records obtained by the Dayton Daily News show. (link) Jul 30, 2017: The girlfriend of former kicker Matt Boermeester said Sunday that the Title investigation that led to his removal from the school's football team was \"horrible and unjust\" to her and Boermeester. Zoe Katz, 22, a senior, said in a two-page statement her attorney emailed to The Times that Boermeester \"has been falsely accused of conduct involving me.\" Katz confirmed that the statement was hers. Her attorney, Kerry L. Steigerwalt, said that alleged that Boermeester shoved Katz outside her home. (link) Jul 26, 2017 lawyer for Bret Weinstein has filed paperwork indicating that the professor plans to sue The Evergreen State College in Olympia. Joe Shaeffer with MacDonald Hoague & Bayless in Seattle filed a tort claim on July 5 with the state Department of Enterprise Services Office of Risk Management, according to documents obtained by The Olympian. The narrative states that college officials didn't take steps to alleviate \"the racially hostile and retaliatory work environment and make the campus safe\" for Weinstein and others. (link) Jul 25, 2017 U.S. judge on Monday ordered Apple Inc to pay $506 million for infringing on a patent owned by the University of Wisconsin-Madison's patent licensing arm, more than doubling the damages initially imposed on Apple by a jury. U.S. District Judge William Conley in Madison added $272 million to a $234 million jury verdict the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation won against Apple in October 2015. (link) Jul 24, 2017 hearing for a lawsuit in which is being sued for a temporary restraining order by the former College of Law dean is scheduled for Sept. 1. Eric Dannenmaier, former College of Law dean, sought a temporary restraining order against to block officials from releasing information regarding an investigation into complaints of sexual harassment made against Dannenmaier by two former employees. (link) Jul 20, 2017 former Catholic University student is suing the university, claiming the administration was biased in favor of his female accuser in a sexual assault case. The student, identified in the complaint as John Doe, says the university violated Title IX, the law that prohibits gender discrimination at federally funded institutions, by showing favor to the woman who charged him with sexual assault (identified in the court filing as Jane Doe). (link) 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 4/9 Jul 20, 2017 one-minute call made from the University-issued phone of Ole Miss football coach Hugh Freeze to a number associated with a female escort service was raised as a potential issue in the back-and-forth between the university's legal counsel and the attorney for former Rebels football coach Houston Nutt, according to records and correspondence obtained by Sports. Ole Miss announced Thursday evening that Freeze had resigned, hours after the school said it would provide a written statement to Sports regarding the phone call. (link) Jul 17, 2017: In USC's lecture halls, labs and executive offices, Dr. Carmen A. Puliafito was a towering figure. The dean of the Keck School of Medicine was a renowned eye surgeon whose skill in the operating room was matched by a gift for attracting money and talent to the university. There was another side to the Harvard-educated physician. During his tenure as dean, Puliafito kept company with a circle of criminals and drug users who said he used methamphetamine and other drugs with them, a Los Angeles Times investigation found. (link) Jul 17, 2017: Columbia University has settled a lawsuit filed by a student over its handling of a sexual assault allegation university investigation in 2013 found Paul Nungesser, an international student from Germany, not responsible of sexual misconduct stemming from allegations by fellow sophomore Emma Sulkowicz does not usually name individuals in sexual assault cases, but in this instance, both parties have spoken publicly about their experience. (link) Jul 14, 2017: Here's a sentence never expected to type, and one you probably never thought you'd read, but former Ohio State linebacker Chris Spielman has filed a lawsuit against Ohio State. According to the Columbus Dispatch, Spielman's lawsuit is over a marketing program that has been using the images of Ohio State athletes without their permission, and without paying them for it. He's filing the lawsuit on behalf of himself as well as current and former Ohio State players. (link) Jul 14, 2017 fairly simple, straightforward investigation has turned into a full-on scandal at Ole Miss. One notice of allegations turned into two. There was a Draft night fiasco featuring a gas mask. Coach Hugh Freeze has been charged with violating the NCAA's coaching responsibility bylaw. (link) Jul 13, 2017: Columbia University has settled a Title lawsuit filed by a former male student whose case attracted national attention after a young woman protested against the administration's handling of her sexual assault allegations by carrying a mattress around campus lawyer representing Columbia graduate Paul Nungesser issued a statement announcing a settlement in the case that dated to 2015. The lawsuit stemmed from what Nungesser described as gender discrimination on the part of the university after Emma Sulkowicz became known as the \"mattress girl,\" in what she called an artistic rendering of her dismay with the administration's handling of her allegations. (link) Jul 12, 2017: The letters have come in to her office by the hundreds, heartfelt missives from college students, mostly men, who had been accused of rape or sexual assault. Some had lost scholarships. Some had been expelled mother stumbled upon her son trying to take his own life, recalled Candice E. Jackson, the top civil rights official at the Department of Education. (link) Jul 10, 2017: Participants in two Brown University 403(b) plans have sued the Providence, R.I.- based university, alleging the plans' managers breached their fiduciary duties under by paying \"unreasonable and excessive fees\" for investments and administrative services and offering too many duplicative investment choices. (link) Jul 08, 2017: After a protracted 16-month investigation, officials at Howard University in Washington, D.C. found a law professor guilty of sexual harassment because he presented students with an exam question about a hypothetical person who was molested while undergoing a Brazilian wax job. Administrators at Howard University School of Law labeled the professor, 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 5/9 Reginald L. Robinson, as a sexual harasser in May, according to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Higher Education (FIRE), a civil rights organization. (link) Jul 07, 2017: Members of the improv comedy group knew the unspoken arrangement: Go along with the persistent sexual advances from the instructor who led their club and get special treatment. Now a University of South Florida Title investigation has concluded that, under school policy, former adjunct Nicholas Riggs sexually assaulted one student and sexually harassed at least one other, abusing his position to coerce them. One student called him a \"puppet master.\" (link) Jul 06, 2017: Baylor University has agreed to settle a federal lawsuit with a former student who accused the nation's largest Baptist school of fostering a \"hunting ground for sexual predators\" and mishandling her alleged attack in 2015 settlement notice was filed in federal court in Waco, Texas on Thursday. No details were released, but the agreement marks Baylor's first settlement to resolve a cascade of lawsuits over the past 18 months by women who said they were attacked and had their cases ignored or bungled by the university for years. (link) Jul 05, 2017: Two siblings who graduated from the University of Florida say the state short- changed them on their education. Alexis S. Geffin 2017, has teamed up with her brother, Ryan J. Geffin 2016, in a lawsuit to claim they did not receive the intended benefits of more than $1 billion in private donations to Florida colleges and universities. Alexis is a sports reporter in Wausau, Wisconsin, while her brother pursued graduate studies at UF. (link) Jul 05, 2017: Duke University is facing yet another lawsuit that alleges it mishandled a rape case. Filed originally in state court and moved to federal court just before the Independence Day holiday, the new case alleges that a graduate student faced harassment and retaliation from university officials after telling them she'd been raped by the live-in boyfriend of a Duke Women's Center counselor who works with victims of gender violence. (link) Jul 05, 2017: Michigan State University dismissed three former football players from the university for their violations of the school's relationship violence and sexual misconduct policy, records show. The former players -- Josh King, Donnie Corley and Demetric Vance -- are also facing criminal charges in connection to a reported campus sexual assault from January hearing is set for September. (link) Jul 05, 2017: When summer break ends, Frederick County campuses will be stocked with a new type of school supply: naloxone, the overdose reversal medication new state law, which went into effect on Saturday, requires all public schools and institutes of higher education to begin stocking the drug -- more commonly known by its prescription name, Narcan -- and training staff on how to administer it. (link) Jul 04, 2017: Again and again, college financial aid offices would frustrate Jan Wagner and Michele Waxman Johnson. As executives of Central Scholarship, a nonprofit in Owings Mills that provides scholarships and interest-free loans to Maryland students, they would award a student money and a university would reduce that student's financial aid by the same amount. (link) Jul 02, 2017: In-house investigators at Duke University believe a former lab tech falsified or fabricated data that went into 29 medical research reports, lawyers for the university say in their answer to a federal whistleblower lawsuit against it. Duke's admissions concern the work of Erin Potts-Kant, and a probe it began in 2013 when she was implicated in an otherwise-unrelated embezzlement. The lawsuit, from former lab analyst Joseph Thomas, contends Duke and some of its professors used the phony data to fraudulently obtain federal research grants. He also alleges they ignored warning signs about Potts-Kants' work, and tried to cover up the fraud. (link) 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 6/9 Jul 01, 2017: The University of Florida is under federal Title investigation for its handling of a December 2015 sexual assault accusation against star receiver Antonio Callaway, the complainant's attorney confirmed. The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights is looking into a complaint filed by Callaway's accuser, her attorney John Clune said Friday. (link) Campus Life & Safety Events Jul 27, 2017: Does Congress have a place in the free speech campus debate? The House of Representatives subcommittee on intergovernmental affairs sought to find out in their hearing on the \"Challenges to Freedom of Speech on College Campuses.\" The key issue is whether, in an effort to preserve free speech, college campuses could fall into an area where their actions would inhibit it. (link) Jul 27, 2017: After years of increasing rates of binge drinking, alcohol-impaired driving, and alcohol-related mortality among emerging adults ages 18 to 24, the numbers are finally starting to come down among college students in that age group, according to a study in the July issue of the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. However, those same numbers are on the rise in young adults of the same age who are not in college. (link) Jul 26, 2017: At around 3:40 a.m. on Tuesday, a student at Kennesaw State University in Georgia was loading up his car in the parking lot of an on-campus residence hall when he was robbed at gunpoint by two thieves. They left with his wallet -- and his handgun. (link) Jul 19, 2017: Two robberies occurred early Wednesday morning, according to a University of Minnesota timely warning. The first happened at approximately 4:15 a.m. at the bus stop near Jones Hall on Pleasant Street where a University student was approached by two suspects and was threatened at knifepoint for his valuables. (link) Jul 19, 2017: Nicholas Lutz, the student who got into trouble after posting a \"graded\" letter written by his ex-girlfriend on Twitter that went viral, had his disciplinary sanctions \"revoked,\" according to a public statement released by his attorney. Lutz came into the national spotlight after tweeting photos of a letter written by his ex-girlfriend, which he edited in red ink and \"graded\" it with a D-minus suspended Lutz for violating policy on students who break local, state, and federal law, following a cyberbullying complaint filed by the ex-girlfriend to the Volusia County Sheriff's Office. (link) Jul 17, 2017: Claremont McKenna College (CMC) issued sanctions to seven students who blockaded a speech by conservative pundit Heather Mac Donald at CMC's Athenaeum, the college announced in a press release on July 17. Three of the students involved were suspended for one year, two were suspended for one semester and two were placed on conduct probation. The college identified these students by examining video and photographic evidence available of the protest against Ms. Mac Donald's speech. (link) Jul 13, 2017: Columbus State University police say not only has the suspect committed fraud on campus but across the city. Stephen Michael Carson has on a green shirt and black shorts. University police say Carson is known for targeting wallets and purses police say Carson has no connection with Columbus State University and he was only on campus to commit crime. (link) 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 7/9 Jul 13, 2017 received a bomb threat on Wednesday evening and, as a precaution, ordered residents evacuated from campus housing at about 10:10 p.m. Many of the residents who were affected gathered safely in Drake Stadium while emergency responders checked campus facilities. No suspicious device was found. At 12:20 a.m. on Thursday, residents were allowed to return to all residence halls at UCLA. (link) Jul 09, 2017: In the fall of 2015, a grassy quadrangle at the center of the University of Missouri became known nationwide as the command center of an escalating protest. Students complaining of official inaction in the face of racial bigotry joined forces with a graduate student on a hunger strike. Within weeks, with the aid of the football team, they had forced the university system president and the campus chancellor to resign. It was a moment of triumph for the protesting students. But it has been a disaster for the university. (link) Jul 06, 2017: The University of Mississippi announced today plans to add plaques to various sites on its Oxford campus and rename one building, all with the goal of offering more history and \"putting the past into context.\" University officials announced the recommendations it will be implementing from the Chancellor's Advisory Committee on History and Context. (link) Jul 06, 2017: Auburn University and the University of Georgia have made a list of the 100 safest colleges in the nation. Also making the list compiled for 2017 by the National Council For Home Safety and Security was Georgia Southern University. Auburn was ranked No. 52, Georgia Southern No. 82 and the University of Georgia No. 100. (link) Jul 05, 2017 conservative nonprofit student group at Macomb Community College said the institution's policy of requiring permission for public speech violates their First Amendment rights. The Turning Point chapter is challenging the college's \"Policy on Expressive Activity\" in a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday at U.S. District Court in Detroit, according to Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing the organization. (link) Jul 04, 2017: The University of Dayton class of 2017 -- the first to enroll under the university's innovative fixed net-price tuition plan -- graduated at a higher rate and with less debt compared to the previous year, the college reported. The record four-year graduation rate of 67 percent is about 8 percent higher than the class of 2016 and well above the university's previous high of 62 percent, set in 2013, officials said. (link) Jul 01, 2017: Federal authorities have arrested and charged a 28-year-old man with kidnapping Yingying Zhang, a visiting scholar at the University of Illinois who disappeared three weeks ago and now is presumed dead. Brendt Christensen, a former Ph.D. candidate who had studied physics at the university, was arrested late Friday, according to a news release from the Department of Justice. (link) Other News & Events Jul 16, 2017: An American student from Princeton University was arrested in Iran and has been sentenced to 10 years in prison on charges he was spying for the United States, an Iranian judiciary official said on Sunday, an action bound to aggravate relations between the two countries. The arrest and sentencing of the American, Xiyue Wang, a graduate student in history, was announced months after he had vanished in Iran, where he was doing research for a doctoral thesis. (link) 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 8/9 If you have any suggestions, questions or feedback, please e-mail me at [email protected]. We hope you find this information useful and would appreciate hearing your thoughts. Feel free to forward this email to your direct reports, colleagues, employees or others who might find it of value. Back issues of this newsletter are available on our web site at If you have any suggestions for items to include in future newsletters, please e-mail Robert Gottesman at [email protected]. Back to top Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy Auburn University 304 Samford Hall M. Kevin Robinson, Assoc [email protected] 334.844.4389 \u00a9 Redistribution of this newsletter, with or without modification, is permitted provided Auburn University Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy is listed as the source. 2/22/25, 10:12 Case In Point 9/9"} |
7,323 | William Chandler | Edinboro University | [
"7323_101.pdf",
"7323_102.pdf",
"7323_103.pdf",
"7323_104.pdf"
] | {"7323_101.pdf": "Edinboro University graduate claims professor sexually harassed him Updated: Oct. 05, 2009, 6:01 p.m. | Published: Oct. 05, 2009, 5:01 p.m. By The Associated Press recent graduate from Edinboro University contends a professor sexually harassed him with repeated references to the movie \"Brokeback Mountain\" and retaliated after he refused to date the professor. The defendant, William Chandler, referred to Cameron Aulner, who graduated in August, and a classmate as \"Brokeback buddies,\" asking, \"Why don't you have a Brokeback moment with your hunting buddy?\", according to the lawsuit. The 2005 movie follows the 20-year forbidden romance between two roughneck ranch hands. Aulner, 22, who now lives in Colorado, is suing the school, some administrators and Chandler had no intention of filing a lawsuit,\" Aulner told The Associated Press in a phone interview from his Westminster, Colo., home on Monday wanted to get the situation resolved and get the professor out of the university.\" Chandler did not return a call and e-mail seeking comment, and school spokeswoman Amy Neil said it cannot comment on active litigation. Advertisement Close All Access + The Patriot-News online newspaper \u2013 Start today for $1 Subscribe The lawsuit contends an investigation by the public university found \"sufficient evidence to support his allegations\" during a 2008 investigation. Still, he said Monday that he decided to sue after administrators failed to take action. Aulner claims he was so intimidated his sophomore year that he agreed to date the professor, despite being heterosexual. He said that he feared refusal might affect his final exam grade, but that he backed out before the date happened. Aulner, who uses a wheelchair because he fell off a roof installing Christmas lights in 2002, contends Chandler would loom over him whenever the professor encountered Aulner in hallways, classrooms, restrooms or elevators. One of Aulner's attorneys, Joshua Friedman of Larchmont, N.Y., said the lawsuit is about Chandler \"taking advantage of a position of power.\" It seeks unspecified damages. If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy. About Us Contact Us Send Us a News Tip Media Group The Patriot-News Advertise with Us Career Opportunities PennLive Community Rules Accessibility Statement Subscriptions PennLive The Patriot-News Newsletters Already a Subscriber Manage your Subscription Place a Vacation Hold Make a Payment Delivery Feedback PennLive Sections Business Obituaries Jobs Autos Real Estate Rentals Classifieds Home News Sports Football High School Sports Betting Entertainment Pa. Life & Culture Pa. Food & Dining Opinion Mobile Apps iPhone, Android Apps Tablet Apps More on PennLive Weather News Archives Post a Job Post a Classified Ad Sell your Car Sell/Rent your Home Sponsor Content Follow Us Twitter Facebook Instagram | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Ad Choices Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement, (updated 8/1/2024) and acknowledgement of our Privacy Policy, and Your Privacy Choices and Rights (updated 1/1/2025). \u00a9 2025 Advance Local Media LLC. All rights reserved (About Us). The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Local. Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site. YouTube's privacy policy is available here and YouTube's terms of service is available here. Ad Choices", "7323_102.pdf": "Professional Assns Corporate Government Health Care IGO's / NGO's / Nonprofits Schools (K-12) Higher Ed May 13, 2010 Labels: Education, Litigation Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators The public liberal arts university in Pennsylvania has settled a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by a former student. In his federal lawsuit, Cameron Aulner, a 2009 graduate of Edinboro had alleged that William Chandler, a Communication and Media Studies professor had made suggestive comments in class and asked him on a date in 2008. Aulner alleged in his lawsuit that the university failed to take action despite his complaints to the Ombuds and other administrators. Edinboro reportedly paid $495,000 in the settlement. The operative complaint in the lawsuit named as defendants University President Jeremy Brown; Janet Dean, Associate of Human Resources; Terry Warburton, Chair of the Communications and Media Studies Department; and Valerie Hayes, Director of Social Equity and Ombudsperson. (Chandler was dropped from the lawsuit after he committed suicide in December 2009.) The student, Aulner, alleged that he complained at least twice to Hayes, although it was not clear whether that was in her capacity as Director of Social Equity or as Ombuds. Nonetheless, Aulner said that Hayes told him in a letter the university would take steps to correct the situation with Chandler, but that the harassment persisted. In court records, Edinboro admitted that administrators had investigated some of the claims made against Chandler, but denied that the school's retention of the professor violated Aulner's rights. (Original Complaint; Edinboro Spectator; Go Erie News.) Aulner, who is paraplegic, gained notoriety in his hometown last October when he tackled a suspected child molester fleeing a crime. (Denver Post.) 5 comments: Anonymous 5/13/2010 7:31 Being named as a defendant seems to imply some culpability, but in this case it doesn't sound like the ombudsman did anything wrong. Instead, it seems like the administration simply failed to handle a bad situation. Sounds like a frustrating case for the ombudsman. Reply Anonymous 5/13/2010 7:33 I'm betting Hayes wishes she didn't wear two hats Reply John W. Zinsser 5/14/2010 8:30 Two hats doing something wrong. Time and again those who wear two hats have either lead to the closure of the program (anyone remember Genentech?) or legal troubles such as described here. As the term continues to be used more and more, and with less and less specificity and orthodoxy to actual meanings, situations like this will continue. The single greatest impediment to the development of the Organization Ombudsman field, in number of host organizations, or legislative support remains the utter lack of understanding of the term, especially as distinct from classical ombudsmen. Several programs, proposed in federal legislation use the word Ombudsman in the title. Inside the legislation the term This post explores a few stories from the past year that offer insights for the future of the Ombuds profession. From the expansion of Omb... Featured Post 2024 Year in Review: Five Big Stories Select Language Powered by Translate Translate Organizational Ombuds serve as a confidential, independent, neutral and informal dispute resolution resource for a specific entity. They are accessible to a defined population and can advocate for fairness. These unique characteristics distinguish Organizational Ombuds from Classical Ombuds, mediators, arbitrators, and other alternative dispute resolution professionals. The term \"Ombuds\" is shorthand for \"Ombudsman,\" \"Ombudsperson\" and \"Ombuds Officer,\" which also are used widely. Some other variants include: Austria -- Ombudsstelle Brazil -- Ouvidor Croatia -- pravobranitelji France -- m\u00e9diateur/def\u00e9nseur Germany -- Ombudspersonen Italy -- difensore Netherlands -- ombudspersoon Norway -- ombudet Poland -- Rzecznik Portugal -- provedor Russia -- \u043e\u043c\u0431\u0443\u0434\u0441\u043c\u0435\u043d Spain -- ombudsman organizacional Sweden -- studentombud Switzerland -- ombudsmann Organizational Ombuds \u25ba 2025 (61) \u25ba 2024 (431) \u25ba 2023 (428) \u25ba 2022 (438) \u25ba 2021 (415) \u25ba 2020 (373) \u25ba 2019 (396) \u25ba 2018 (397) \u25ba 2017 (308) \u25ba 2016 (383) \u25ba 2015 (296) \u25ba 2014 (354) \u25ba 2013 (365) \u25ba 2012 (387) \u25ba 2011 (470) Blog Archive More Create Blog Sign In 2/22/25, 10:12 The Ombuds Blog: Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators 1/5 Newer Post Older Post Home Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Replies Reply Enter Comment is repeated and is the actual function. This includes Senator Franken's proposed Homeowner's Ombudsman (Modeled off of the Taxpayer Advocate) Senator Dodd's Ombudsman (Functional titled Office of the Investor Advocate) and others believe it was at the Annual Conference in Tuscon where a speaker (forgive me do not recall the name) urged the field increase efforts at self definition of the profession. The strong contention was that if we did not do it, others would do it to us. In my limited perspective and recent experience would say that is more and more the case. John W. Zinsser ConflictBenefit.com Reply Anonymous 7/01/2010 1:28 The other 2-hatted culprit in this case was ombudsperson Janet Dean, whose Ombudsrole Hayes inherited. Dean was the person to whom Edinboro employees and students were told to bring their sexual harrassment complaints to. She was named in this complaint also Edinboro U's administration is notorious for their refusal to properly address complaints of any kind. The sexual harrassment complaints (there are more than one) are coming back to haunt them. As they well should!! Reply Anonymous 4/22/2012 1:05 as a former student and employee of edinboro you have no idea how correct you are and yes there a reason why i will remain anonymous \u25bc 2010 (500) \u25ba December (42) \u25ba November (26) \u25ba October (44) \u25ba September (53) \u25ba August (41) \u25ba July (37) \u25ba June (40) \u25bc May (39) Five Long Days With a Hospital Ombuds Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution Offers... The Story of a Suicide -- An Ombuds' Worst Case Sc... Job Posting: University of Minnesota Twin Cities Job Posting: Office of Personnel Management Update Austin Staff Council Submits Recommenda... Complaint of Swimming Officials to be Heard by... Job Posting: Inter- American Development Bank Two Organizational Ombuds Launch Blogs International Association for Conflict Management Santa Cruz Ombuds Intervenes in Student Protest Ohio State Renews Faculty Ombuds Appointment Guide to Cognitive Biases Duke Reappoints Faculty Ombuds Mindmap of Mediation Models Washington University in St. Louis to Create Ombud... Psychologist Urges Ombuds as Buffer for Student At Newsletter Highlights Membership Growth and Le Dispute Resolution Writing Competition Friday Poll: Do You Publish an Annual Report? Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds Newsletter Previews Conference Job Posting: University of Louisville British and Irish Ombuds to Meet This Week in Wales University of Arkansas Posts Annual Report for Omb... Royal Roads University has an Ombuds Placeholder Ombuds for Tyco Electronics Serves Internal and Ex... 2/22/25, 10:12 The Ombuds Blog: Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators 2/5 Interview With Colorado State University Ombuds University of Victoria Ombuds Posts 2009 Annual Re... Navy Reserve Ombuds Hold First National Conference Eighth Annual Midwest Meeting of University & Coll... Australian and New Zealand Ombuds Convene in Welli... San Jose State's Ombuds Reports Strong Demand Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics Sets Prog... Columbia Offers Ombuds Course Again Job Posting: Food and Drug Administration Ombuds Could Draw Scrutiny in Gulf Oil Spill In... East Carolina University, Please Don't Call it an ... Texas Ombuds Will Meet May 12 \u25ba April (45) \u25ba March (49) \u25ba February (45) \u25ba January (39) \u25ba 2009 (490) \u25ba 2008 (472) \u25ba 2007 (387) \u25ba 2006 (50) Nightly updates from FeedBlitz Enter email: Get email updates Get Updates Code of Ethics Standards of Practice Standards of Practice Standards for Ombuds (2004 Guidance on Standards Guide for Federal Employee Ombuds Report on The Role of Ombudsmen in Dispute Resolution Resolution in Support of Ombuds Programs (2017) The Organizational Ombudsman: Origins, Roles and Operations Legal Guide Toolkit Garstang v. Superior Court (Caltech) Report for the President on the Use and Results of Alternative Dispute Resolution Recommendation on the Use of More Info About Ombuds 2/22/25, 10:12 The Ombuds Blog: Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators 3/5 Ombuds in Federal Agencies Declaration of Best Practices for University of California Ombuds Tom Kosakowski Los Angeles Area, California, United States am a University Ombudsperson, Mediator, and Attorney. The material in this blog does not reflect on any matters have handled or am currently handling. This information should not be construed as legal, medical or psychological advice; readers should consult their own professionals for advice can be contacted at Tom [dot] Kosakowski [at_sign] gmail [dot] com.) View my complete profile About Me Content and Relevance Stay on topic: Comments should be relevant to the post. Be respectful: Personal attacks, insults, profanity, inflammatory language, and discriminatory or harassing comments will not be tolerated. No self-promotion or spam: Comments should contribute to the conversation and not be used to for commercial purposes. No confidential information: Do not share confidential information about your organization or visitors. Length and Format Keep it concise: Comments should be clear and to the point. Excessively long comments may be edited for clarity and length. Use appropriate formatting: Do not use all caps unnecessarily. Comments may include formatting for readability. Other Considerations Be professional and respectful: Please be mindful of your content, even when commending anonymously. Comments may be edited reserve the right to remove or edit any comments that violate these guidelines. My edits will be noted. Complaints about IOA: This is not the appropriate forum to lodge formal complaints against the International Ombuds Association. Guest editorials: Please email me directly to discuss a guest editorial offering a longer, more in-depth perspective on a topic related to the organizational ombuds profession Comment Policy Editorial comments and opinions are solely mine and do not reflect any endorsement by the International Ombuds Association or any other entity with which am or have been affiliated. -Tom Kosakowski Disclaimer: This is Not the Blog 2/22/25, 10:12 The Ombuds Blog: Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators 4/5 Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger. 2/22/25, 10:12 The Ombuds Blog: Edinboro University Settles Lawsuit Against Ombuds and Other Administrators 5/5", "7323_103.pdf": "Professor Hit With Sexual Harassment Claim / October 9, 2009 ERIE, Pa. (CN) - An Edinboro University professor passed out Playboy magazines in class, referred to students as \"Brokeback buddies\" and retaliated against a male student for rebuffing his advances, the student claims in Federal Court. Recent graduate Cameron Aulner has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against William Chandler, a journalism professor at the university in Edinboro, Pa. Aulner claims Chandler constantly referred to \"Brokeback Mountain,\" a movie about a love affair between two cowboys, and asked Aulner and his classmate, \"Why don't you have a Brokeback moment with your hunting buddy?\" The professor also rationalized his decision to pass out copies of Playboy and other pornographic magazines to students, claiming pornography \"is a means of communication,\" the lawsuit states. Aulner claims Chandler repeatedly asked him out on dates, but he turned the professor down. Aulner, who is heterosexual, says he eventually agreed to a date because he \"feared that declining the invitation would affect his grade,\" but he later canceled. Aulner allegedly complained to several university officials about Chandler's behavior. Administators found \"sufficient evidence\" to support his claim, but failed to discipline Chandler, according to the lawsuit. Though Chandler stopped speaking to Aulner after the complaints, he allegedly stood \"very close\" to the student in the hallways and \"hovered over him in the computer lab.\" Aulner says he frequently found himself alone with Chandler in the bathroom and elevator, causing him to fear for his safety. Aulner claims the administration knows that Chandler has a \"long history of sexual harassment and retaliation,\" including his being removed as campus radio station advisor due to complaints. He seeks damages from Chandler, Edinboro University and three university officials, including President Jeremy Brown. He is represented by Joshua Friedman in Larchmont, N.Y. Categories bscribe to Closing Arg ments Try Litigation Reports or Log in Friday, February 21, 2025 | Back issues Log in to CasePortal Saturday, February 22, 2025 Free Litigation Reports Find Judicial Opinions 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor Hit With Sexual Harassment Claim | Courthouse News Service 1/2 Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Connect with us on our social channels: \u00a9 2025, Courthouse News Service About Us / Masthead / Advertise / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Support Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world. enter your e-mail address Additional Reads Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Japan\u2019s manga lures French readers craving something different February 21, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-21 February 21, 2025 Subscribe to Closing Arguments Submit 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor Hit With Sexual Harassment Claim | Courthouse News Service 2/2", "7323_104.pdf": "------------------------------------------------------------------x AULNER, Case No. Plaintiff, -against BROWN, in his personal capacity CHANDLER, in his personal capacity DEAN, in her personal capacity, and HAYES, in her personal capacity, Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------x The Plaintiff, Cameron Aulner (hereinafter \u201cPlaintiff\u201d or \u201cAulner\u201d), by and through his attorneys, the Law Offices of Joshua Friedman, complains as follows 1. This is a teacher-on-student sexual harassment case brought pursuant to Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 (\u201cTitle IX\u201d), 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 (\u201cSection 1983\u201d) and Pennsylvania common law 2. At all relevant times herein, Plaintiff was an undergraduate student at the Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, who earned his degree in Communications in August 2009. 3. Defendant Edinboro University of Pennsylvania (hereinafter \u201cEdinboro\u201d or \u201cUniversity\u201d) is an institution of higher learning located in Edinboro, Pennsylvania, which is located within the Western District. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 11 2 4. Edinboro is part of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, which, inter alia, seeks and disperses federal funds to the fourteen institutions of higher education that comprise that organization. As such, Edinboro is an \u201ceducation program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance\u201d within the meaning of Title IX. 5. Defendant Dr. Jeremy Brown (\u201cBrown\u201d) has served at all relevant times herein as the President of Edinboro. 6. Defendant William Chandler (\u201cDr. Chandler\u201d) was at all relevant times herein a professor in Edinboro\u2019s Communications and Media Studies Department. 7. Defendant Janet Dean (\u201cDean\u201d) was at all relevant times herein Edinboro\u2019s Associate Vice President of Human Resources. 8. Defendant Valerie Hayes (\u201cHayes\u201d) was at all relevant times herein Edinboro\u2019s Director of Social Equity and University Ombudsperson. 9. Federal jurisdiction is present based on Title pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1343. 10. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to the general venue statute, 28 U.S.C. \u00a71391 11. Aulner matriculated as a student at Edinboro in or about the fall of 2005. 12. As a result of an injury sustained prior to his tenure at Edinboro, Plaintiff is wheelchair- bound. 13. In or about the fall semester of the 2006-2007 academic year, Aulner enrolled in a class entitled Mass Communications and Modern Society. Dr. William Chandler, a tenured professor in Defendant\u2019s Communications and Media Studies Department, taught the class. 14. Throughout the semester in the class, Aulner observed and was subjected to inappropriate behavior by Dr. Chandler. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 2 of 11 3 15. By way of example, and not of limitation, Dr. Chandler\u2019s misconduct in the Mass Communications class included the following: a. Passing copies of Playboy and other pornographic magazines around class, which Dr. Chandler rationalized by claiming that pornography is a means of communication; b. Asking students if they used pornography; c. Making off color jokes such as claiming to have seen certain students at the massage parlor in town; d. Using an inordinate amount of class time to socialize with male students who were also members of the football team, such as by asking those students about their drinking habits and making statements laden with innuendo that suggested those students engaged in homosexual acts with one another. 16. Dr. Chandler also focused a great deal of unwanted attention on Plaintiff during the Mass Communications class. 17. By way of example, but not of limitation, the inappropriate conduct Dr. Chandler directed at Aulner at that time manifested itself as follows: a. Dr. Chandler constantly referred to the movie \u201cBrokeback Mountain,\u201d a film about two cowboys who have a homosexual relationship; b. Dr. Chandler referred to Plaintiff and his classmate, Josh Coon (\u201cCoon\u201d) as \u201cBrokeback buddies\u201d or \u201chunting buddies\u201d and asked them, \u201cWhy don\u2019t you have a Brokeback moment with your hunting buddy?\u201d; c. Dr. Chandler attempted several times to ask Plaintiff out on date, although Aulner rebuffed those advances. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 3 of 11 4 18. Three days before the final exam for Mass Communications was scheduled, Aulner received an anonymous letter in the mail. The letter, which had been typed on a manual type writer, reads loudmouth you [sic] shouldshow [sic] yourhunting bud or brokeback bud this picture and maybe you would get you\u2019re a. it\u2019s a great high school pic of you.\u201d 19. Attached to the type written letter was a pornographic image of a naked young man who resembles Plaintiff. 20. The day after he received the anonymous letter, Dr. Chandler asked Plaintiff to go out with him again. Aulner initially agreed because he feared that declining the invitation would affect his grade in Dr. Chandler\u2019s class. 21. However, the next day, Plaintiff left a voicemail informing Dr. Chandler that he felt the invitation was inappropriate and he would not go out with him. When Dr. Chandler confronted Plaintiff about canceling their date, Aulner asked him if he sent the type written letter and picture. Dr. Chandler smirked but denied sending Plaintiff the letter. 22. Thereafter, Aulner complained about Dr. Chandler\u2019s misconduct to numerous University officials, including the Chair of the Communications and Media Studies Department, Dr. Anthony Peyronel, and the Dean of the School of Liberal Arts, Dr. Terry Smith. Both Drs. Peyronel and Smith informed Plaintiff that they could not help him and he would have to bring his concerns regarding Dr. Chandler to the attention of Edinboro\u2019s Administration. 23. As directed, Plaintiff raised his concerns regarding Dr. Chandler with the University\u2019s Ombudsperson, Valerie Hayes. Hayes promised Aulner she would look into the situation and do what she could. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 4 of 11 5 24. Although Plaintiff tried to avoid him and the classes he taught, Dr. Chandler continued to harass Aulner. Every time he saw Plaintiff in the hall way or the computer lab, Dr. Chandler would comment on Aulner\u2019s good looks and touch him. 25. Aulner requested a second meeting with Hayes to complain about Dr. Chandler\u2019s ongoing harassment. 26. In or about January 2008, sometime after that second meeting, Plaintiff received a letter from Hayes regarding her purported investigation of his complaints against Dr. Chandler. Aulner was informed that the University\u2019s Administration had concluded there was sufficient evidence to support his allegations regarding Dr. Chandler\u2019s misconduct. The letter noted that Edinboro would take steps to correct the situation but did not discuss how it would do so. 27. In the months following Plaintiff\u2019s receipt of the letter from Hayes, Dr. Chandler continued to harass Aulner. Although he no longer spoke to Plaintiff, Dr. Chandler stood very close to Aulner when he saw him in the hallway and hovered over him in the computer lab. Aulner found himself alone in the bathroom and elevator with Dr. Chandler several times and began to fear for his safety. 28. Aulner brought Dr. Chandler\u2019s ongoing misconduct to the attention of Defendants Brown and Hayes as well other Edinboro administrators. 29. Upon information and belief, Defendant Brown obtained notice of Aulner\u2019s complaints from an Edinboro trustee, John Evans (\u201cEvans\u201d), with whom Plaintiff discussed his concerns regarding Dr. Chandler following a class Evans attended as a guest speaker. 30. Despite Defendants\u2019 notice of Plaintiff\u2019s complaints, Dr. Chandler\u2019s inappropriate conduct continued unabated until Aulner graduated in August 2009. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 5 of 11 6 31. Edinboro administrators, including but not limited to Defendants Brown, Dean and Hayes, who had authority to institute corrective measures on Defendant\u2019s behalf, were aware of numerous complaints raised by students who complained about Dr. Chandler\u2019s inappropriate conduct well before Dr. Chandler began to sexually harass Plaintiff in or about 2007. 32. Prior to the University\u2019s decision to grant Dr. Chandler tenure, which was made in or about 1999, numerous male and female students raised harassment complaints against him. 33. In 1998, three male students, Matthew Peters (\u201cPeters\u201d), Jason Grants (\u201cGrants\u201d) and Sean Pebbles (\u201cPebbles\u201d), raised sexual harassment complaints against Dr. Chandler. Upon information and belief, Edinboro did not respond in a timely manner to the complaints raised by Peters, Grants and Pebbles. 34. During the same time period, two African-American female students, Kaneca Miles (\u201cMiles\u201d) and Andrea James (\u201cJames\u201d), claimed that Dr. Chandler took a ruler to lift up their skirts and offered them a can of sweet potatoes that contained an offensive depiction of an African-American on the label. Upon information and belief, the University did not respond to the complaints raised by Miles and James. 35. On information and belief, these complaints were brought to the attention of Defendant Dean in or about 1998. The basis for such belief is that the students\u2019 complaints, including details, were included in a retaliation complaint brought by an Edinboro faculty member in 1998. 36. Students who staffed the radio station raised complaints against Dr. Chandler throughout his ten-year tenure as the radio station\u2019s advisor ending in or about 2001. 37. What follows is a partial list of the students on the radio station\u2019s staff who raised harassment complaints against Dr. Chandler during the 1999 to 2001 time period, shortly before his removal from the radio advisor position: Stacey Shiveley; Cathy Candiotti; Jarred Brown; Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 6 of 11 7 Douglas Robinson; Rick Kennis; Erin Dean; Christopher Volack; Jill Hayes; and, Torrey L. Quinn. In addition, Cathy Candiotti\u2019s parents complained to Edinboro officials about Dr. Chandler\u2019s harassment of their daughter during that time period. 38. On information and belief, the complaints of the students arising from Defendant Chandler\u2019s duties at the radio station were brought to the attention of Edinboro administrators including Defendant Dean. The basis for such belief is Defendant Chandler\u2019s removal from the position of radio station advisor in or about 2001, a position he was specifically hired for and which constituted a significant part of his responsibilities at Edinboro prior to his removal. 39. As a result of Dr. Chandler\u2019s long history of sexual harassment and retaliation, which Defendants have knowingly allowed to continue, Aulner has suffered significant injury, which has manifested itself in a number of ways, including but not limited to the following: depression, anxiety, social withdrawal, insomnia, anger, and fear 1972 40. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 41. Dr. Chandler\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff was based on his male sex, was in retaliation for reporting his misconduct, or both. 42. Edinboro has had actual notice of Dr. Chandler\u2019s sexual harassment of students and has been deliberately indifferent to complaints about his misconduct. 43. This indifference was the proximate cause of Plaintiff\u2019s injuries. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 7 of 11 8 1972 44. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 45. Dr. Chandler\u2019s sexual harassment of Plaintiff was based on his male sex, was in retaliation for reporting his misconduct, or both. 46. Edinboro, and specifically employees with the power to stop it, had actual notice of Dr. Chandler\u2019s severe and pervasive sexual harassment and retaliation against Aulner, and has been deliberately indifferent to complaints about his misconduct. 47. This indifference was the proximate cause of Plaintiff\u2019s injuries 42 \u00a71983 48. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 49. Defendants Brown, Chandler, Dean and Hayes, acting under color of state law, deprived Plaintiff with reckless and/or callous indifference to his federally protected rights, including but not limited to, rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as rights secured by 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq. and in doing so was motivated by evil intent. 50. Specifically, Defendants Brown, Dean and Hayes deprived Plaintiff of the equal protection of the law when Dr. Chandler harassed Plaintiff, of which Defendant had actual notice of and deliberately failed to take effective measures to stop. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 8 of 11 9 51. Defendants Brown, Chandler, Dean and Hayes\u2019 conduct proximately caused Plaintiff\u2019s injuries 52. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 53. Edinboro knew, or in the exercise of ordinary care, should have known of the necessity for exercising control over Defendant Chandler, its employee, because it had prior notice of sexual harassment complaints raised by students other than Plaintiff, which would have prevented Defendant Chandler from sexually harassing and retaliating against Plaintiff. 54. Edinboro\u2019s tortious conduct proximately caused Plaintiff\u2019s injuries 55. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 56. Defendant Chandler intentionally and/or recklessly inflicted emotional distress on Plaintiff by sexually harassing him and retaliating against Plaintiff after he complained about Defendant Chandler\u2019s conduct. 57. Defendant Chandler\u2019s conduct was so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond the pale of decency and is regarded as intolerable in a civilized society. 58. Defendant Chandler\u2019s tortious conduct proximately caused Plaintiff\u2019s injuries. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 9 of 11 10 59. Plaintiff hereby alleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs. 60. Defendant Chandler violated Pennsylvania common law by physically assaulting and battering Plaintiff when Defendant Chandler touched Plaintiff. 61. Defendant Chandler\u2019s tortious conduct proximately caused Plaintiff\u2019s injuries. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief: A. Declare Defendant Edinboro\u2019s conduct complained of herein to be in violation of the Plaintiff\u2019s rights as secured by 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681; B. Declare the Defendant Brown, Dean and Hayes\u2019 conduct complained of herein to be in violation of the Plaintiff\u2019s rights as secured by 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983; C. Award Plaintiff compensatory damages to be determined by the jury at the time of trial; D. Award Plaintiff punitive damages to be determined by the jury at the time of trial; E. Award Plaintiff reasonable attorneys\u2019 fees and costs, including the fees and costs of experts, incurred in prosecuting this action; and F. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper Plaintiff requests a jury trial on all issues triable to a jury. Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 10 of 11 11 Dated: October 2, 2009 Law Offices of Joshua Friedman ___________________________ Joshua Friedman Rebecca Houlding Daniela Nanau 25 Senate Place Larchmont, New York 10538 Attorneys for Plaintiff Case 1:05-mc-02025 Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 11 of 11"} |
7,822 | Erick Guerrero | University of Southern California | [
"7822_101.pdf",
"7822_102.pdf",
"7822_103.pdf",
"7822_104.pdf",
"7822_105.pdf",
"7822_106.pdf",
"7822_107.pdf",
"7822_108.pdf",
"7822_109.pdf",
"7822_110.pdf"
] | {"7822_101.pdf": "grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor By Carlos Granda Thursday, October 26, 2017 University of Southern California grad student is leveling sexual harassment charges against a professor and saying the university failed to take appropriate action to discipline him and protect students grad student is alleging professor Erick Guerrero made inappropriate sexual advances. 24/7 Live 53\u00b0 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 1/6 Karissa Fenwick was getting her degree from when she claims associate professor Erick Guerrero made sexual advances during an academic conference in New Orleans. Fewnwick says the behavior included \"convincing me to come to his hotel room, including sitting me on his bed and leaning over and trying to kiss me. Only stopping once started yelling in protest and ran past him out of the room.\" She says he was in charge of the committee that controlled her doctoral dissertation and her future career. \"After realizing what he had done, the next day threatened her entire career if she were to come forward, said her attorney, John Winer.\" She filed a lawsuit because she says after an investigation the school found there was inappropriate behavior but Guerrero was not fired and is still at the school. Fenwick says \"When heard what the discipline was it sunk in they were actually keeping things quiet. And protecting him rather than protecting me and the other students.\" Fenwick claims during the investigation Guerrero tried to turn things around and say he was known as the hot Latino professor. 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 2/6 \"Now he is saying that she's coming forward because he's Latino and she's a person of white privilege - which is a disgusting thing for him to say,\" Winer said. The university issued a statement which says in part: \"...He was barred from leadership positions, his office was relocated away from students, and he will not teach classes or supervise students for the current academic year and beyond. And he was warned that any recurrence could lead to dismissal.\" Fenwick's attorney says there was another incident with a different student and professor Guerrero back in 2011. He believes now that this story is public there could be other women who come forward. Report a correction or typo Copyright \u00a9 2025 Television, LLC. All rights reserved. Related Topics 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 3/6 Topics 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 4/6 Home Weather Traffic U.S. & World Politics Consumer Regions Los Angeles Orange County Inland Empire Ventura County California More Live Video Apps ABC7 En Espa\u00f1ol Investigations Shop Company Submit News Tips Listings About ABC7 Meet the News Team Jobs/Internships ABC7 Merchandise 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 5/6 Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Personal Information Children's Privacy Policy Your State Privacy Rights Terms of Use Interest-Based Ads Public Inspection File Applications Copyright \u00a9 2025 Television, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2/22/25, 10:13 grad student alleges sexual harassment by professor - ABC7 Los Angeles 6/6", "7822_102.pdf": "Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit After the Sexual Harassment Task Force at the Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work dissolved in Spring 2018, the school has started making changes to its harassment and discrimination policies. (Julia Rosher/Daily Trojan) Erick Guerrero, a former assistant professor who was placed on probation in Fall 2018 following an investigation of his alleged sexual harassment of a student, is no longer employed at the University as of Nov. 20, 2018, University Media Relations confirmed to the Daily Trojan. Guerrero\u2019s lawyer Mark Hathaway said Guerrero, who was an assistant professor at the Dworak- By March 7, 2019 \u2018Woke DEI\u2019 database identifies $10.6 million in research funds \u2018Harry Potter and the Cursed Child\u2019 is a feat of theatrical magic Savannah Tweedt marches to the beat of her own drum Students launch Hospitality Wrapped flags DEI- related terms in research projects \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 1/6 Peck School of Social Work resigned from the University. The Daily Trojan could not confirm this with USC. In October 2017, graduate student Karissa Fenwick filed a lawsuit against and Guerrero, accusing him of sexually harassing her in his hotel room during an academic conference. Guerrero also filed a libel lawsuit in October 2018 against 72 professors from the School of Social Work who publicly condemned him after the sexual harassment allegations surfaced. Hathaway and University Media Relations declined to comment on the status of the libel lawsuit. Fenwick said she was informed of Guerrero\u2019s departure from through \u201cunderground gossip\u201d rather than an official message from the University. While Fenwick said she understands the University must be careful with the information it releases concerning Guerrero due to the lawsuits at hand, she said that she and other students should have been informed that Guerrero would no longer be present on campus would imagine that they could at least release something saying that he is no longer on the faculty [so] that students know that, because it wasn\u2019t just me who became fearful seeing him around,\u201d Fenwick said. Fenwick\u2019s lawyer John Winer said he did not know why the Got a story idea Looking to advertise with us? Visit dailytrojan.com/ads \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 2/6 University has not Guerrero\u2019s departure publicly commented. \u201cThey owe it to Karissa to inform her, to let her feel safe and comfortable being on campus, and they haven\u2019t done that because they won\u2019t announce anything,\u201d Winer said. \u201cThey\u2019re keeping everything for some reason confidential.\u201d Fenwick was also a student member of a Sexual Harassment Task Force assembled in Fall 2017. Students, faculty and staff on the task force compiled a 49- page report with recommendations to improve the School of Social Work\u2019s policies, procedures and communication regarding issues of harassment and discrimination. But she said she hasn\u2019t received many updates on the progress of the recommendations since the task force submitted its report in Spring 2018. \u201cMany of us have been wondering what is happening with those, when are they being implemented and how,\u201d Fenwick said. \u201cIt seems like the school just wants the whole thing to fizzle out, which guess can understand from their perspective, but it\u2019s unsettling think from some of ours.\u201d Carl Castro, an associate professor at the School of Social Work,who was also part of the task force, said changes have already begun, but communication was more consistent before the task force dissolved last spring. Back then, he said updates were routinely \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 3/6 provided via email and on the task force website just think we need a school- wide and University-wide campaign of communicating changes,\u201d Castro said. \u201cYou can\u2019t just say it once, you\u2019ve got to say it multiple times, in multiple ways, in multiple venues.\u201d Tory Cox, assistant dean of field education at the Virtual Academic Center, also worked on the Sexual Harassment Task Force. Cox served as a co-chair for the Steering Committee, which guided the Environmental Culture Workgroup, Policy Workgroup and Assessment Workgroup. He also served as a liaison between the groups. Cox said that in preparation for the Fall 2019 semester, the School of Social Work updated its guidelines in business agreements with field organizations that graduate students work with to complete their required internship hours. These changes included measures to make students aware of harassment and discrimination policies at these internships and inform them on how to file a complaint. He said field instructors, who supervise students during internships, also received training, which includes live sessions and a 30-minute video about the University\u2019s expectations for harassment and discrimination policy and reporting. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 4/6 \u201cWe\u2019ve done a nice, really thorough circle of what it takes in the field environment to make sure all parties are well-informed and that the process for filing a complaint is clearly delineated,\u201d Cox said. Cox said these changes seemed necessary in light of recent sexual harassment allegations made on campus and complaints students made regarding their internships. \u201cWe have students in every state doing internships, so the more spread out you get, the more important your policies and expectations are \u2026 so that agencies know where you\u2019re coming from as an institution,\u201d Cox said. Cox said the School of Social Work also sent out a school climate survey in January that included questions on sexual harassment and discrimination for students, faculty and staff. Its results are currently being compiled and will be used to identify more key issues the school must address. The School of Social Work faculty also voted to add six extra pages to its Faculty Guidebook on sexual harassment and discrimination policies, which is waiting on University approval, according to Castro. \u201cThe idea of culture change is an important thing to recognize, that this is what the effort of the task was, to make sure that what had taken place previously would not take place again,\u201d Cox said. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 5/6 Share this entry \ue8f3 \ue932 \ue805 Guerrero could not be reached for comment at the time of publication. lawsuit \u00a9 University of Southern California/Daily Trojan. All rights reserved. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:13 Professor leaves quietly amid controversy, lawsuit - Daily Trojan 6/6", "7822_103.pdf": "Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff October 25, 2017 / 8:12 News doctoral student Karissa Fenwick says her personal nightmare began in January, when she attended an academic conference in New Orleans with people from her department, including associate professor Erick Guerrero, the professor in charge of her doctoral dissertation committee. She says he made some unwanted physical advances in the hotel bar, then offered to call her an Uber from his hotel room News Weather Sports Videos News Shows 56\u00b0 Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 1/7 \"And as got up to go outside he got up and put his hands on the sides of me and like brought me over to the bed and sat me down and leaned over me trying to kiss me and it was like at that moment a light switched on my head and like you have to get out of here now,\" Fenwick said. She says she ran in tears out of the room. The next day, she says Guerrero told her not to tell anyone what happened. \"He said that he would take down anyone told and that the dean would never take my side or let anything happen to him.\" Fenwick says, on the dark airplane ride home, she felt scared and alone. \"On the one hand, reporting him felt like was sabotaging my whole career,\" she said. \"And on the other hand felt like could not stand back and just wonder if it Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 2/7 was going to happen to somebody else if never said anything felt had to do it to protect other students. The next day, Fenwick reported what she says happened to another professor at and an investigation got underway. Seven months later, Fenwick received this letter from USC: Dr. Guerrero told the university Karissa had been romantically interested in him, and that there was a \"sexualized environment at the school towards him and that students referred to him as the \"hot Latino professor.\" The report goes on to say \"none of the witnesses interviewed could recall hearing anyone refer to Dr. Guerrero by that name.\" The university investigator concluded \"that Dr. Guerrero made an unwelcome sexual advance toward you in a hotel room in New Orleans and attempted to dissuade you from reporting the incident Vice Provost Martin Levine notified professor Guerrero. The provost regards your offenses as sufficiently serious that he considered bringing charges leading to your dismissal, but has decided not to do so in this instance.\" Instead, professor Guerrero was suspended one semester without pay, and will not be allowed to teach doctoral students for the next three years. John Winer is representing Fenwick in the lawsuit filed this week against professor Guerrero and the university. \"It was a slap on the wrist. He should have been fired,\" Winer said. \"There should have been an immediate warning to the student body. Especially once there are findings that this man is dangerous and to this day, that doesn't happen.\" Fenwick says she hopes her story will help to warn other students. Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 3/7 And, she says, when she is on campus, she is paralyzed by the thought she might run into the professor can try to prepare myself for that in my head, but think if when have to see him again in real life don't know how would respond and that scares me too.\" Statement from Dr. Guerrero have been responding to these false allegations for almost 10 months am here and am not going anywhere. The allegations in the complaint are false and have answered them in court this afternoon respect that the court process will be rigorous and fair for everyone have peace of mind that things will be cleared out after the facts are revealed have been a social worker in a female dominated profession for 20 years and have committed my career to promote equity and empower vulnerable groups would never put myself in a compromising situation that can take away all the things have worked so hard to accomplish am proud to be one of few Mexican-American Professors with tenure at a world-class University married my dream partner, Emma who is also a professor and we are blessed now to have a six-month old baby girl am living the American Dream and am confident that this will end well for my family. Statement From took the complaint of sexual harassment very seriously. It thoroughly investigated the claims, and based on the findings it disciplined the faculty member involved. In accordance with our policies, a financial penalty was imposed, he was barred from leadership positions, his office was relocated away from students, and he will not teach classes or supervise students for the current academic year and beyond. And he was warned that any recurrence could lead to dismissal. Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 4/7 \u00a9 2017 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. During this process we sought to support the complainant by providing a new dissertation advisor and prohibiting her previous advisor from any and all contact with her. We further provided her with additional school support. The university is reviewing the recent legal filings to determine if additional action is warranted. More from News United Firefighters of Los Angeles president is \"outraged\" over removal of chief Need a bodyguard for the night? There's a new app for that. Los Angeles hospital breaks ground on youth psychiatric center How much are Mavs tickets selling for post Luka Doncic trade Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. All Channels for Only $49 (Buy Now Access all channels anywhere, anytime Join new Free to Play War Thunder Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 5/7 Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Crossout: New Apocalyptic Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy.\u2026 Why You Should Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy Top Packaging Trends In 2024 (Take Look) Search Now Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Book Your Low Priced Cruise (See Offers) Explore lowest priced offers today. Elderly Woman Lives in an Old Shed - Take a Peek Inside! Don't judge before you see the inside Never Throw Away the Water After Boiling Eggs - The Reason is Genius! Wish we had known this before Pakistan: Jewelry On Sale For Half Price (See Price List) Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 6/7 \u00a92025 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Details 2 Contests & Promotions Program Guide Sitemap About Us Advertise Television Jobs Public File for Public File for Public Inspection File Help Applications Report Learn More Watch News 2/22/25, 10:13 Student's Sexual Harassment Claim Backed, But Professor Still On Staff Los Angeles 7/7", "7822_104.pdf": "Clarity in this chaotic news cycle There\u2019s an overwhelming amount of news, but not enough context. At Vox, we do things differently. We\u2019re not focused on being the first to break stories \u2014 we\u2019re focused on helping you understand what actually matters. We report urgently on the most important issues shaping our world, and dedicate time to the issues that the rest of the media often neglects. But we can\u2019t do it alone. We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today? Join today This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? Karissa Fenwick says her university\u2019s response to her harassment report was insufficient. She\u2019s not alone. by Anna North Dec 14, 2017, 9:00 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 1/20 Anna North is a senior correspondent for Vox, where she covers American family life, work, and education. Previously, she was an editor and writer at the New York Times. She is also the author of three novels, including the New York Times bestseller Outlawed. Karissa Fenwick says she was at a conference in New Orleans in January when her academic adviser tried to kiss her. Fenwick was a doctoral student in social work at the University of Southern California, working on her dissertation on mental health and substance abuse care in community treatment organizations. Erick Guerrero was the associate professor advising her work. In January 2017, Fenwick and Guerrero attended the annual conference of the Society of Social Work and Research, where they were scheduled to give a presentation together. The conference was also supposed to be an opportunity for Fenwick, who was planning to job hunt in the fall ahead of her 2018 graduation, a chance to meet people in her field who could one day hire her. On the first day of the conference, Guerrero suggested that the two go to a bar to discuss Fenwick\u2019s networking strategy, Fenwick told Vox. When they got there, she said, \u201cit became pretty clear that that really wasn\u2019t the intention\u201d \u2014 Guerrero began to make her uncomfortable, touching her lower back and putting a dollar bill in her jeans so she could request a song from a piano player. As they were walking back from the bar, Fenwick says Guerrero told her, \u201cwe should address the sexual tension between us.\u201d He said \u201che\u2019d always seen me in a sexual way,\u201d Fenwick recalled, \u201cand he said that other people that worked with me felt the same way about me.\u201d Fenwick was confused and upset, she said, but agreed to go with him to his hotel room, where he would arrange an Uber pickup. She remembers thinking that if she agreed to his plan, \u201cwe could sort of somehow just end this situation.\u201d The University of Southern California Jeff Greenberg via Getty Images 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 2/20 Guerrero did call Fenwick an Uber, she said. But when she got up to leave, he tried to kiss her. She leaned away, but his lips touched hers. She protested and ran out of the room. Two days later, after their presentation at the conference, Fenwick says Guerrero confronted her. He told her she needed to keep what had happened between them a secret, \u201cand that if didn\u2019t it would ruin both of our careers,\u201d she told Vox. He also threatened to \u201ctake down anyone told,\u201d she said. Fenwick, who has filed a lawsuit against Guerrero and USC, said that Guerrero\u2019s advances scared her not just in themselves, but because \u201che was the person who was in charge of basically everything was doing at that moment professionally.\u201d As her adviser, he would have a huge influence over whether and when she graduated, and his letter of recommendation would carry enormous weight in her job search. In a response to Fenwick\u2019s lawsuit provided to Vox by his lawyer, Guerrero denied all allegations of inappropriate behavior. But Fenwick says his actions derailed her plans for her dissertation and have made her consider leaving academia entirely. In the wake of her lawsuit, filed after what she felt was an insufficient punishment of Guerrero by 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 3/20 USC, Fenwick\u2019s story has inspired a new push by faculty and students at the school of social work to investigate and fight sexual harassment. But given the power dynamics at play in academia, the issue goes far beyond USC. Students and professors in fields ranging from history to neuroscience are beginning to speak out, arguing that universities eager to keep problems quiet, close-knit communities that discourage reporting, and a system in which faculty members hold enormous power over their students all make academics particularly vulnerable to sexual harassment and assault. Recent surveys have shown that large percentages of people working in academic fields \u2014 especially women and graduate students \u2014 have been victims of some form of sexual misconduct. Inspired by reports of harassment at universities around the country, as well as by women\u2019s accounts of their experiences with Harvey Weinstein, Donald Trump, and other powerful men, students and faculty are urging schools like and professional groups like the American Historical Association to address a problem many say has been ignored for too long. For harassers in academia, punishment can be light few days after the conference, Fenwick filed a complaint with USC. The university investigated and found, in May, that a preponderance of the evidence supported Fenwick\u2019s statements that Guerrero had made an unwelcome advance and told her not to report it. Guerrero appealed the ruling, saying that Fenwick had flirted with him at the piano bar, and that in response, he suggested she find a new adviser. The university investigated Guerrero\u2019s account of events, but found insufficient evidence to back it up. In September, USC\u2019s Office of the Provost decided that Guerrero would be suspended without pay for a semester, beginning in fall 2018. (Guerrero is not teaching this semester.) He would also be barred from teaching doctoral students, serving on doctoral committees, and holding leadership positions for three years. For Fenwick, this punishment was insufficient. She sued and Guerrero in October, arguing in her suit that Guerrero \u201chas not accepted any responsibility for his 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 4/20 conduct, yet he will remain as an employee at USC. The corrective actions taken by were minimal and not reasonable under the circumstances.\u201d In her suit, Fenwick said that Guerrero, who had been advising her work since 2015 and had been granted tenure in 2016, had made her feel uncomfortable even before the conference in January. He had pressured her to come to a conference in 2016, where he took her to lunch at a steakhouse, ordered wine, and asked her if she was seeing anyone, she said. Fenwick also said in the suit that she wasn\u2019t the first to accuse Guerrero. Another student, identified in the suit as Student X, said that beginning in 2011, Guerrero had begun a pattern of inappropriate behavior toward her, including asking her out to the opera, putting his arm around her, asking if she was dating a male student, and complimenting her boyfriend on his \u201cgood taste.\u201d According to the suit, the student reported Guerrero\u2019s behavior to another professor in 2011, but it was never investigated. 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 5/20 In his response to Fenwick\u2019s suit, Guerrero said he had no idea Student had ever been uncomfortable with his behavior, that the student was not specific in her comments to the other professor, and that Guerrero \u201chas never been reported for any alleged harassment or any misconduct until Ms. Fenwick made her false report in January 2017.\u201d He also said that failed to share with him any evidence from the investigation. Guerrero has filed a grievance with the university took the complaint of sexual harassment very seriously said in a statement released to media outlets. \u201cIt thoroughly investigated the claims, and based on the Karissa Fenwick Courtesy of Karissa Fenwick 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 6/20 findings it disciplined the faculty member involved.\u201d The university also said it was \u201creviewing the recent legal filings to determine if additional action is warranted.\u201d The Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work at USC, where Fenwick studies, is ranked 12th in the nation among graduate social work programs by News & World Report. It is large, with more than 100 full-time faculty members and about 3,200 graduate students, most of them studying for master\u2019s degrees. As social work scholars, many students in the program study ways to protect people from the kind of treatment Fenwick says she experienced lot of what we teach is specifically around prevention of victimization,\u201d said Ron Avi Astor, chair of the school\u2019s faculty council and a professor who studies bullying. \u201cMany of us, not just me, on our faculty are international experts in this.\u201d As a profession, social work has strict standards when it comes to protecting clients from harassment. \u201cIf a social worker did this with a client or in a hospital,\u201d Astor said, \u201cthey would be kicked out right away.\u201d Many students and faculty have been critical of the university\u2019s handling of the case. In October, more than 60 faculty members at the School of Social Work signed a statement calling the sanctions against Guerrero \u201cgrossly inadequate given the conclusions of USC\u2019s own investigation and the nature of the multiple offenses.\u201d The letter\u2019s authors also criticized the school for keeping the sanctions private after they were imposed, noting that they only learned of the findings regarding their colleague when Fenwick\u2019s lawsuit became public. \u201cSilence allows harassment and assault to go unchecked,\u201d they wrote. For a tenured faculty member, a ban on teaching for a few years is \u201cbasically a sabbatical,\u201d said Robin Petering, a doctoral social work student and the co-founder of a coalition of students called Social Workers for Accountability and Transparency. Launched in response to Fenwick\u2019s suit, the group is advocating for changes, large and small, that it believes would keep students safer. Petering and other students in the coalition are concerned that Guerrero may engage in inappropriate behavior with students when the three-year period is over, and that 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 7/20 there is no mechanism in place to warn future students about the investigation or its findings. \u201cFrom our standpoint it felt like these sanctions were really almost beneficial to a serial perpetrator,\u201d Petering said. Light sanctions aren\u2019t unique to USC, according to Petering. \u201cUniversities have a history of really kind of brushing this off,\u201d she said. Sexual harassment in academia is widespread, especially against graduate students When Celeste Kidd was a graduate student in the department of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester, she was strongly encouraged to work with T. Florian Jaeger, who had received his PhD in linguistics with an additional focus on cognitive science from Stanford in 2006. While they worked together, Kidd told Vox, Jaeger \u201cnot only made derogatory comments about me, he made near-constant derogatory comments about the appearances and bodies of my classmates, some of whom he had been in or would be in a sexual relationship with.\u201d He told Kidd that one of her peers took medication that \u201cmade her vagina taste bad,\u201d she said. Especially disturbing to Kidd was the fact that he coupled sexual comments about female students \u201cwith derogatory, demeaning comments about their scientific capability and professional potential,\u201d she added. When she was a new student at Rochester, Jaeger urged Kidd to rent a room in his house, according to an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint Kidd and others later filed against the university. Jaeger \u201ctold Kidd that his professional opinion of her would inevitably be tied to his personal opinion of her,\u201d the report states. \u201cHe said that when people asked about her, he would have to be honest.\u201d Kidd interpreted this as a threat that he would retaliate professionally if she didn\u2019t keep him happy; she rented the room. Kidd heard Jaeger insult people, especially women, who had expressed discomfort with his behavior, she told Vox. When asked why certain women in the department didn\u2019t like him, she said, \u201ca common thing he would say is that they had made a pass at him, 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 8/20 he didn\u2019t go for it, and that\u2019s why they were upset.\u201d Overall, Kidd said, Jaeger \u201ccreated an atmosphere in which we all were acutely aware of how much power he had and how little power we had.\u201d Ultimately, Kidd moved out of Jaeger\u2019s house. Jaeger declined to comment on the record for this story. The first time Kidd reported her experience with Jaeger to anyone at the University of Rochester was in 2013, when another graduate student, Keturah Bixby, went to the department chair, Greg DeAngelis, with concerns about Jaeger and mentioned Kidd as someone who also had bad experiences with him. Kidd told DeAngelis that she had been forced to switch areas of study because of Jaeger, she told Vox, and gave the names of other women who had been affected by Jaeger\u2019s behavior. Despite this information, DeAngelis ultimately told Bixby that he had not found anything in Jaeger\u2019s history to warrant an investigation, Kidd said. For her, that was evidence that \u201cthis was not the kind of thing that the university took seriously.\u201d Not long after, Jaeger was granted tenure. DeAngelis has not responded to a request for comment from Vox. Earlier this year, Kidd and other professors, along with Bixby, filed a complaint with the EEOC, alleging that when they complained to the university about Jaeger\u2019s behavior with female students, they were subject to retaliation and disparagement by university officials. After the complaint was filed, university officials announced the launch of an independent investigation into harassment policies and claims of retaliation at Rochester. The investigation is expected to produce a report in January spokesperson for the University of Rochester said that \u201cwhen complaints were brought to the attention of the administration, the university immediately launched an internal investigation, conducting more than 40 interviews and making every reasonable effort to contact anyone directly involved.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 9/20 The spokesperson, Sara Miller, continued, \u201cGiven new allegations in the complaint to the EEOC, we believe that the recently commissioned independent investigation sponsored by a special committee of the Board of Trustees is the best way to fully understand, address, and learn from this matter.\u201d Perhaps until recently, \u201cit actually did benefit universities to try to sweep problems under the rug,\u201d said Laurel Issen, who received her PhD from the brain and cognitive sciences department at Rochester in 2013. She and other students \u201cactively avoided Florian Jaeger,\u201d she wrote in a recent article in Nature, \u201cbecause of his frequent sexual innuendos, pressure to have intimate relationships and other unprofessional behaviour.\u201d In the past, \u201cthe more universities discounted victims and backed up their powerful lucrative professors, the more they just shut down the problem and never had to deal Joel Seligman, the president of the University of Rochester, answers questions from students at a town hall meeting to address the complaint against the university. Yiyun Huang/Campus Times 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 10/20 with it again,\u201d Issen said. It took years \u2014 and the involvement of senior professors \u2014 for the University of Rochester to fully investigate harassment complaints, she added. Efforts to measure the problem of harassment in academia in recent years have yielded some disturbing findings. In a 2014 survey of 666 scientists who did field research away from their universities, 64 percent reported experiencing sexual harassment, and nearly 22 percent reported sexual assault. Women were more likely to report such experiences than men, and graduate students and postdoctoral researchers were more likely to report them than faculty members. In a 2016 survey of 525 graduate students at the University of Oregon, 38 percent of female students and about 23 percent of male students said they had been sexually harassed by faculty or staff; almost 58 percent of women and 39 percent of men said they had been harassed by fellow students. An anonymous survey on sexual harassment in academia launched on December 1 by Karen Kelsky, a former anthropology professor who now offers consulting on the academic job search, had collected more than 1,000 responses by December 4 colleague attempted to attack me in his office,\u201d one respondent wrote had to physically push him off of me and run out of the room.\u201d Another wrote, \u201ckissed on the mouth in front of entire board of a prize committee at dinner following conference was the one receiving the prize).\u201d Women of color may experience especially high rates of harassment. In a 2017 survey of astronomers and planetary scientists, 40 percent of women of color felt unsafe in the workplace because of their gender, compared with about 20 percent of white women. Twenty-eight percent of women of color in the survey felt unsafe because of their race. Recently, universities have started taking harassment complaints more seriously, Issen said. The election of President Donald Trump, who has been accused of harassing, assaulting, or otherwise violating at least 17 women, has inspired a sense of solidarity among everyone who opposes harassment and abuse, she explained. \u201cSometimes things think, have to get really bad before there\u2019s the turning point.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 11/20 Issen and other students have been talking about harassment for a long time, she said. It\u2019s just that now, \u201cthe public is more willing to listen.\u201d Advisers and other faculty members have enormous power over graduate students After Fenwick filed her complaint about Guerrero with USC, the university helped her find a new adviser. However, \u201cthe project end up doing for my dissertation will not be of the same scope\u201d as her original project, she said. The professors on her dissertation committee now are \u201cvery talented scholars, but they don\u2019t have the same expertise in this specific niche as Dr. Guerrero did.\u201d Fenwick now hopes to graduate in fall 2018 or spring 2019. For doctoral students in many fields, the relationship with an adviser is critical. Students often come to a university to study with a particular professor, who works closely with the student to develop a dissertation project. \u201cWe have a guild mentality about graduate education, whereby faculty believe that they have the right to design their advisees\u2019 graduate education and to define its terms, for better or worse,\u201d said Karen Graubart, a history professor at the University of Notre Dame. Students who switch advisers sometimes have to change topics as well, since other faculty members may not have the expertise needed to advise them in their original research. This can mean losing months or even years of work. An alternative \u2014 working with professors whose backgrounds aren\u2019t suited to a student\u2019s dissertation subject \u2014 can hamper a student\u2019s chances on the academic job market, which has grown intensely competitive in many fields as universities rely increasingly on part- time, low-paid adjuncts. While the adviser typically has the most influence over a graduate student\u2019s work, other faculty members can have significant power over their careers as well. Jaeger was never Kidd\u2019s primary adviser, but when she moved out of his house, she also changed her research focus so she would no longer be working in his area of study feared he would retaliate by blocking my papers from being published, by preventing me from being accepted at conferences,\u201d she said. \u201cIf you work in the same area as 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 12/20 somebody, they have a lot of influence over your career even if they\u2019re not in the same location as you.\u201d \u201cAcademia isn\u2019t really like a bunch of independent institutions,\u201d Chanda Prescod- Weinstein, a postdoctoral researcher in theoretical physics at the University of Washington, Seattle, said. \u201cDepartments are all networked like a series of franchises that talk to each other.\u201d That means \u201ca single powerful person can really end your career.\u201d For these reasons and more, some students who are harassed by faculty members choose to leave academia entirely. \u201cThere\u2019s been a lot of talk about how to keep women in the pipeline, but it fails to make a crucial connection: One reason the pipeline leaks is that women are harassed out of science,\u201d wrote Joan C. Williams, the director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California\u2019s Hastings College of the Law, and Kate Massinger for the Atlantic last year. Issen, the former Rochester graduate student, is now a health care management consultant at General Electric, and says what she experienced at Rochester influenced her decision to leave academic work behind. \u201cIf this is how people can behave and get tenure,\u201d she said don\u2019t want to be here don\u2019t want anything to do with this kind of climate.\u201d Fenwick is also considering a move away from an academic career. Her experience \u201cundermined my trust in systems like academia, that had thought would be more protective of students,\u201d she said. \u201cI\u2019m not sure now that any universities, having seen what was willing to do in this situation, would be interested in hiring me,\u201d she said don\u2019t think they\u2019re looking for people who are quote-unquote troublemakers.\u201d Students and faculty are demanding that universities take harassment seriously Professors and students around the country, galvanized by survivors\u2019 public statements and by increased public attention to the issue, are calling on universities and 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 13/20 professional associations to investigate and prevent harassment. Many are calling for research to help university officials develop prevention strategies. Some are proposing strategies for fixing the power dynamics that put students at risk. Others are holding universities to account, making clear that it is their responsibility to make sure students and others are safe from workplace predators. At USC, Fenwick\u2019s case has inspired calls for change both broad and specific. In late November, the student group Social Workers for Accountability and Transparency sent a statement to the university administration recommending that Guerrero be fired. \u201cAs long as Erick Guerrero remains on faculty, students will not feel safe,\u201d the letter said. The coalition is also discussing possible policy recommendations, including increased transparency when someone is found to have committed harassment, Petering said students and administrators at a November town hall meeting to discuss sexual harassment. Courtesy of Robin Petering 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 14/20 The School of Social Work is establishing a task force to address sexual harassment, which will include faculty, student, staff, and alumni representatives. One goal is to develop an anonymous survey to determine the scope of the problem and identify patterns, said Astor, the faculty council chair. The task force will also work on the section of the school\u2019s handbook regarding sexual harassment, aiming to \u201craise the standards so they will at least match what our professional standards are in social work,\u201d Astor said. Across universities and across fields, other faculty and students are working on \u2014 or calling for \u2014 similar reforms. More than 400 faculty members at colleges and universities around the country have signed an open letter saying they will not advise their students to study or work at the University of Rochester number of disturbing incidents in academia have recently become public or semi- public knowledge, and the Harvey Weinstein scandal has opened up an international discussion about unaddressed sexual harassment and violence,\u201d wrote 12 history professors and students, including Graubart, the Notre Dame professor, in a letter to the American Historical Association in November, which now has more than 800 signatures. The authors called on the to study the possibility of creating a centralized system for reporting harassment and to collect data on harassment and violence in their field of study. More data about the problem should help historians propose remedies. \u201cSome of those remedies are just going to be about bringing things into the light,\u201d Graubart said. \u201cAcademia is really, really good at silence.\u201d Another crucial step for academic departments is to hire more female and nonbinary faculty of color, said Prescod-Weinstein, the physicist. \u201cMany of us who are on the market are interested in working with vulnerable populations, but we also often change the culture simply by being present,\u201d she explained 2017 study of 40 public universities found that black, Hispanic, and female faculty were underrepresented in biology, chemistry, and economics; the study also found a significant gender gap in pay, even when adjusted by field. 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 15/20 \u201cAcademia is not doing well as an industry,\u201d and one reason is a lack of diversity, said Issen, the former Rochester graduate student. Universities \u201cneed to protect people who are in the minority and who are in more vulnerable positions so that then they can become more powerful,\u201d she said. One possible solution to the power imbalances that can leave students vulnerable would be \u201cencouraging students to have more than one professor named as their adviser,\u201d Issen added. That way, students would be less dependent on a single person for their academic and professional success. Issen also suggests \u201chaving people who are employed to actually protect graduate students and staff.\u201d She noted that GE, where she works now, holds culture calls where employees can bring up harassment or other concerns and discuss how best to address them. \u201cUniversities need to realize the brain drain that they are creating by not prioritizing this issue,\u201d Issen said. Harassment, and retaliation against people who report harassment, are major reasons why women are underrepresented in science and engineering, Kidd said. \u201cIt looks like I\u2019m not getting kicked out of science yet,\u201d she added. \u201cBut I\u2019m a rare case. So many other women were stopped from realizing their potential before their careers took off, and that\u2019s a loss that we all need to mourn More in Politics Trump wants America to shine on is blundering it. It\u2019s a vital moment for policy. DOGE\u2019s mass firings could trash vital expertise | 5:00 By Trump unified the right. Now the infighting has begun 21 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 16/20 His moves on Ukraine, ethics, and the rule of law have spurred some conservative criticism. Will it matter? By hits a roadblock at the new agreement has blocked a plan to give a staffer access to highly sensitive tax data 21 By Elon Musk is coming for our weather service Job cuts, ideology, and a sharpie: Trump\u2019s beef with an important scientific agency, explained 21 By President Trump\u2019s first 100 days Trump appears intent on remaking the executive branch as he sees fit. The news is changing rapidly. Follow here for the latest updates, analysis, and explainers 21 By Is Kim Kardashian actually going MAGA? The influencer\u2019s love for Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the Trump family has some fans wondering 21 By 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 17/20 Recommended For You Is Trump about to hand Ukraine to Russia 20 Trump makes another power grab 19 We\u2019re about to learn just how eager the Supreme Court is to help Trump 19 The crisis coming for our national parks, explained in two charts 19 How de-aging in movies got so good 19 Meta\u2019s brain-to-text tech is here. We are not remotely ready 19 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 18/20 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 19/20 About us Our staff Ethics & Guidelines How we make money Contact us How to pitch Vox Newsletters Privacy Notice Terms of Use Cookie Policy Manage Privacy Settings Licensing Accessibility Platform Status Careers \u00a9 2025 2/22/25, 10:14 This grad student says her professor harassed her. Her life changed. Did his? | Vox 20/20", "7822_105.pdf": "Photo by Ken Lund grad students are dismayed by the university\u2019s handling of sexual harassment allegations against a professor. Another Sexual Harassment Case at Fuels Student Outcry Published on June 15, 2018 By Bobbi Murray \uf099 \uf09a \uf1a1 \uf0e1 \uf0e0 The University of Southern California is under federal investigation for its handling of sexual misconduct complaints against long-time campus gynecologist George Tyndall. The Los Angeles Police Department is investigating some 52 complaints about Tyndall and multiple lawsuits have been filed against Tyndall and USC. In the shadow of Tyndall\u2019s case and other high-profile scandals at the university, a coalition of graduate students at the Dworak-Peck School of Social Work worry that another ongoing harassment case against associate professor Erick Guerrero is drawing too little attention. \u201cWith the Tyndall case coming forward, it\u2019s disappointing that there hasn\u2019t been any connection between our issue and this larger thing,\u201d said Robin Petering, who completed her Ph at last year and is the leader of the coalition Social Workers for Accountability and Transparency (SW4AT). \u201cSo few people know about the case.\u201d At issue is a finding by the campus Office of Equity and Diversity that Guerrero had sexually harassed two students. Guerrero was disciplined but remains on staff. The findings were kept confidential. In October, more than 70 social work school faculty signed a statement complaining that they became aware of the case through media reports of a lawsuit filed against Guerrero and by one of the students allegedly harassed 2/22/25, 10:14 Another Sexual Harassment Case at Fuels Student Outcry 1/3 TOPICS: Editor\u2019s note: On July 3, 2019, Karissa Fenwick asked the court to dismiss all of her claims against Guerrero. The court dismissed the case with prejudice on July 8, 2019 # Four Months In, Kaiser Mental Health Strike Remains in a Standoff / January 30, 2025 How This Teachers\u2019 Union Is Gearing Up for Trump 2.0 / January 24, 2025 Maui\u2019s Post-Wildfire Housing Crisis Offers a Warning for Los Angeles / January 28, 2025 Border Crossings Have Declin Keeps Moving Migrants Out of / January 29, 2025 Top Stories In a lawsuit filed in L.A. County Superior Court, graduate student Karissa Fenwick says Guerrero \u2013 then her dissertation advisor \u2013 made unwanted advances while they attended a conference in New Orleans. Fenwick\u2019s complaint details sexual comments and inappropriate touching at a bar where they met for a meeting. Guerrero then suggested the student wait for an Uber in his hotel room, where he tried to kiss her. Fenwick says she fled the room, and was warned the next day to not speak of the interaction. An unnamed student, not a plaintiff but noted extensively in the lawsuit as \u201cStudent X,\u201d was also allegedly the target of unwanted and \u201cinappropriate conduct of a sexual nature,\u201d including remarks about her hair and physique. The SW4AT coalition has launched a campaign called Am Student X\u201d to raise awareness of the issue of sexual harassment in academia. The group is highly critical of the university\u2019s handling of the Guerrero case and contends that \u201cthe University does not prioritize student safety or health over other agendas.\u201d \u201cEvery department has a story and experiences,\u201d Petering said. \u201cOur experience in our school is not unique.\u201d Guerrero denies the charges in the Fenwick lawsuit and filed a grievance last September challenging the findings, which were upheld. On June 5, Guerrero\u2019s attorney Mark Hathaway filed a writ in L.A. Superior Court challenging what it calls \u201ca quasi-judicial proceeding\u201d by the OED. Hathaway declined to discuss next steps in the court case against Guerrero, as did Fenwick\u2019s attorney. The School of Social Work did not respond to calls for comment. The SW4AT coalition is strategizing on how to use the momentum of yet another scandal to raise the profile of the cases at the school of social work. \u201cIf you don\u2019t connect them you run the risk of not being able to prevent these things in the future,\u201d Petering said. \u201cWhat is the university going to do to prevent another Tyndall?\u201d Copyright Capital & Main 2/22/25, 10:14 Another Sexual Harassment Case at Fuels Student Outcry 2/3 Immigrant Advocates Have a Message for Trump: Not In California / January 23, 2025 \uf04b Black Altadena Rebuilds after the Eaton Fire with Guidance from Octavia Butler / January 24, 2025 Fear and Expulsion: Under Trump, History Is Poised to Repeat Itself / January 31, 2025 Today\u2019s Immigration Raids Ign Looming Global Crisis: Not En Workers / January 31, 2025 About Capital & Main Our Staff Board of Directors Advisory Board Awards Columns Special Series Latest Videos Donate Careers Subscribe Contact Us Donor Transparency Policy Donor Disclosure Editorial Independence Policy Copyright 2024 | Fact-based reporting, not opinion. | | 2/22/25, 10:14 Another Sexual Harassment Case at Fuels Student Outcry 3/3", "7822_106.pdf": "This article is 8 years old. Information may not be up to date doctoral student sued the school over its response to sexual harassment doctoral social work student Karissa Fenwick sued the university on Tuesday, claiming it didn't take necessary action after she reported sexual harassment by associate professor Erick Guerrero. Expand Karissa Fenwick was present at the press conference with her lawyer, John D. Winer (left), and her press agent, Lee Housekeeper (right). (Lauren Floyd/Annenberg Media) By Chantel Buchi October 26, 2017 at 5:52PM \uf4f3 Listen Karissa Fenwick with her lawyer, John D. Winer, at the press conference. (Lauren Floyd/Annenberg Media doctoral social work student Karissa Fenwick sued the university on Tuesday, claiming it didn't take necessary action after she reported sexual harassment by associate professor Erick Guerrero, who denies the allegations. The lawsuit also names him as a defendant. In the suit, Fenwick said Guerrero sexually harassed and assaulted her at a conference in January and then \"tried to coerce her into not reporting his gross misconduct.\" The suit, filed in County Superior Court, alleges that the professor has a history of \"sexually inappropriate behavior with female students.\" \"The allegations in the complaint are false and have answered them in court this afternoon,\" Guerrero said in an email to Annenberg Media have peace of mind that things will be cleared out after the facts are revealed.\" Fenwick spoke at a press conference on Thursday, accompanied by her lawyer, John D. Winer, detailing her allegations about what occurred at the conference in New Orleans. \"He made verbal and physical advances, including that he always thought of me sexually, including convincing me to come to his hotel room, including sitting me on his bed and leaning over trying to kiss me, only stopping once started yelling in protest and ran past him out of the room,\" Fenwick said of Guerrero. She said that Guerrero, who was her dissertation adviser and primary mentor, then cornered her at the conference and threatened her by saying he would take down anyone she told and said the dean would be on his side. \"So at that point was terrified because he controlled not only my dissertation but my ability to graduate and my reputation in the field that wanted to get a job in,\" Fenwick said. Fenwick said she filed her report to the Office of Equity and Diversity seven days after the incident. Her lawyer, Winer, said the university did nothing to separate Fenwick from Guerrero. \"[The university] made findings in favor of Karissa, finding that Prof. Guerrero assaulted her in his hotel room and sexually harassed her in his hotel room, and found the next day, that he did indeed try to convince her not to come forward by threatening her,\" Winer said. A\u6587 Share Army Reserve Officer Training Corps is phasing out its programs | Mandatory apartment dining plan more than doubles in price | Annenberg Media 2/22/25, 10:14 doctoral student sued the school over its response to sexual harassment \u2013 Annenberg Media 1/4 USC, he said, \"administered extraordinarily light discipline to a professor who should have been fired spokesperson said the school \"thoroughly investigated the claims, and based on the findings it disciplined the faculty member involved.\" Guerrero received a \"financial penalty,\" was prevented from holding leadership positions, and will not be able to teach classes or supervise students \"for the current academic year and beyond.\" His office was also relocated \"away from students.\" Guerrero was also warned that \"any recurrence or retaliation could lead to dismissal,\" the university said. At the press conference, Fenwick said, \"I'm hoping that by talking about what I've been through in the past nine months will help USC, as well as other institutions, to realize they need to do more to address sexual harassment in their communities.\" Editor's picks 1 The Countdown to March: Vol. 3 2 VTuber Takanashi Kiara perches at Beverly Center\u2019s Hololive pop-up store 3 Talk of The Threads: #FireNicoHarrison discourse \u2014 Where has the Luka Doncic trade left the city of Dallas? 4 Dozens evacuated from Village Target while makes arrest 5 College Basketball Catch-Up: Looking at some of the best teams in the country Latest 2/22/25, 10:14 doctoral student sued the school over its response to sexual harassment \u2013 Annenberg Media 2/4 Recommended About Annenberg Media \u2022 Contact Us \u2022 Get Involved uscannenbergmedia.com \u00a9 2024 Annenberg Media 2/22/25, 10:14 doctoral student sued the school over its response to sexual harassment \u2013 Annenberg Media 3/4 Info About Alumni Ethics Guide Code of Conduct Resources Accessibility Watch Impact Production Blogs Annenberg Radio News From Where We Are Match Volume Podcasts Trojan Tales Los Angeles From the Classroom International South Read Arts, Culture & Entertainment The Beacon Project Black. Capsule D\u00edmelo Earth elevASIAN Gaming and Esports Health & Wellness Interactives Politics Voices Sports Baseball Basketball Column Football Soccer Track and Field Volleyball 2/22/25, 10:14 doctoral student sued the school over its response to sexual harassment \u2013 Annenberg Media 4/4", "7822_107.pdf": "Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC\u2019s actions after sexual harassment complaint Faculty members of the Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work sent a letter [ to students of the school on Saturday expressing their disapproval of the disciplinary measures has taken against Professor Erick Guerrero following a complaint of sexual By TOM\u00c1S October 28, 2017 Daily Trojan file photo [ content/uploads/2017/10/web-salute.jpg] \u2018Woke DEI\u2019 database identifies $10.6 million in research funds \u2018Harry Potter and the Cursed Child\u2019 is a feat of theatrical magic Savannah Tweedt marches to the beat of her own drum Students launch Hospitality Wrapped flags DEI- related terms in research projects \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 1/17 harassment. At the time of publication, 68 faculty members had signed the letter. \u201cWe simply cannot reconcile the limited sanctions imposed by the University,\u201d the letter read. \u201cThis was an egregious exploitation of Professor Guerrero\u2019s power as a trusted faculty member and mentor.\u201d The letter stated that faculty members were never notified that Guerrero had been sanctioned for the harassment allegations, adding that remaining silent \u201ccontributes to the serial perpetration of sexual misconduct.\u201d The letter asked for the University to revisit its decision to not terminate Erick Guerrero. \u201cRegardless of the reputational consequences to the offender or institution, transparency is critical,\u201d the letter read. \u201cPrivacy is often untenable when there are safety concerns.\u201d Julie Cederbaum, associate professor at the School of Social Work, helped the tenure-line faculty draft the letter. She said that as social workers, it was important for them to stand for justice. \u201cWe have a strong ethical obligation to maintain a safe learning environment,\u201d Cederbaum said. \u201cWe need to be leaders in standing up when any of those values are tested.\u201d On Thursday, Marilyn Flynn, the dean of the School of Social Work, sent a letter to the school\u2019s Got a story idea Looking to advertise with us? Visit dailytrojan.com/ads \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 2/17 community urging faculty to open spaces during class to let students ask questions and address concerns regarding the recent news about Guerrero. \u201cWe must always be vigilant,\u201d Flynn wrote will pledge absolutely that anyone who makes a complaint will be protected, and no one will be subject to retaliation. This is the only way to protect the positive culture we have enjoyed.\u201d The letter from Dworak-Peck faculty comes three days after Karissa Fenwick, a doctoral student at the School of Social Work, filed a lawsuit against Guerrero and the University. The suit stated that Guerrero had sexually harassed her in his New Orleans hotel room in January. It also alleged that the University Photo of Erick Guerrero from Dworak-Peck School of Social Work website. [ content/uploads/2017/10/guerrero.jpg] \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 3/17 Share this entry \ue8f3 \ue932 \ue805 did not sufficiently discipline Guerrero for his actions. Before filing the lawsuit, Fenwick reported the incident to the Office of Equality and Diversity. The launched an investigation, which concluded with a letter from the provost\u2019s office suspending Guerrero for a semester without pay starting Fall 2018. USC\u2019s statement to the Daily Trojan stated that Guerrero was barred from teaching and supervising students starting this academic year. Guerrero has denied all of the lawsuit\u2019s allegations and filed a demurrer and answer to the complaint following the lawsuit am here and am not going anywhere,\u201d Guerrero wrote to the Daily Trojan in a statement on Wednesday would never put myself in a compromising situation that take away all the things have worked so hard to accomplish.\u201d The University did not respond to multiple requests for comment NOTE: Some comments have been removed because they violate the Daily Trojan\u2019s comment policy: \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 4/17 Mom with Greek Son October 31, 2017 at 9:52 Let he who is without sin cast the first stone \u2013 John 8:7 My son and will pray for all of you. God Bless! Michael October 29, 2017 at 1:42 The Inquisition does not necessarily reflect the consensus opinion of Trojans. Anyone who is interested in understanding the idiocy of these Title tribunals should read \u201cUnwanted Advances\u201d by Laura Kipnis. It\u2019s hard to tell whether race was really a factor here, but the woman\u2019s story and motivations are highly questionable. Why is she suing *USC* anyway? If 8 \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 5/17 Alumni October 29, 2017 at 1:50 She is suing the university because of their lack of transparency and lack of adequate punishment to someone who their own investigation found GUILTY. The letter here is not some arbitrary Title tribunal but a letter of discuss and call for action by from his colleague, those who know him and have worked with him since 2009. Considering the racial, ethnic, and she has a legitimate grievance, she should sue the professor instead. Why is she entitled to our taxpayer money? \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 6/17 philosophical diversity of the faculty, student groups, and alumni that are siding with Karissa and Student highly doubt that race is a factor. The issue at play as a rampant abuse of power emanating from someone a great deal of power (Guerrero) over someone who has none (students Alumni October 29, 2017 at 3:26 If you are worried that your tuition money is being misused please look \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 7/17 into how it is being spent you might be surprised by the financial statements (which is required to disclose) \u2013 specifically how \u2018operation costs\u2019 are dispersed. It sounds like you are concerned that your tuition money might go towards a settlement or ruling in the lawsuit \u2013 it wont. Your tuition money goes to funding building projects, paying \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 8/17 professors (like Guerrero (if you are going to argue about this spell his name right)), funding non- federally funded research centers, etc and other universities have legal insurance for these kinds of issues, meaning that the monies that are awarded are not necessarily coming out of tuition payments, and sometimes are just coming out of a \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 9/17 legal insurance policy. Anywho think you are missing the point of all this and why people are upset and why she is suing the university. If greed was her primary motivation she would not have going through formal university processes for months on end and only sued the university after the punishment was handed down \u2013 with many \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 10/17 parties deeming it much too lenient. Just a general comment think you are on the losing side of this issue. You are resorting to name calling and straw- man arguments \u2013 much like our sexual- harasser- in-chief (Trump know both parties in the case and know many others who are involved \u2013 personally will say \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 11/17 as a character assessment that this is an issue you are ill informed on stand with those who have been harassed and assaulted \u2013 and am happy that we are now in the ear where they are no longer afraid to come forward hope that one day you too will be happy that women (and men) no longer have to living in such a \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 12/17 toxic environment Seth Maxw October 29, 2017 at 5:08 Just ignore Michael He is a troll. Michael if you are a student hope you gain some wisdom with your educatio Right now you just look \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 13/17 absolute foolish. Mich October 29, 2017 at 7:14 \u201cIf greed was her prima motiva she would not have [?] going throug formal univer proces for month on end and only sued the univer after the punish was hande down. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 14/17 Logic fail,no sequit blue screen of death. Whate snowfl Mich October 30, 2017 at 9:04 That money is still comin out of the pocket of people who work hard for it. Think about it for a second \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 15/17 and you\u2019ll unders Also receive substa state and federa fundin dumba troll. Nicole Altstadt October 31, 2017 at 8:22 Oppressed princess? Why do you think it is ok to use that kind of language? You just demonstrated misogyny. You have a lot to learn about victim \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 16/17 Comments are closed. blaming. Maybe you should take your money elsewhere if you are going to call people names and attack a woman who is clearly traumatized by a threatening event. Shame on you. \u00a9 University of Southern California/Daily Trojan. All rights reserved. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies 2/22/25, 10:14 Social work faculty pens letter condemning USC's actions after sexual harassment complaint - Daily Trojan 17/17", "7822_108.pdf": "(866) 680-7184 Confidential Consultation & Evaluation - No Recovery No Trusted, Honored and Awarded. Over $225 Million Recovered For Our Clients Student Sues Professor for Sexual Harassment NEWS: Sexual Abuse & Harassment Suit Filed Against Self Described \u201cHot Latino Professor still can\u2019t stop thinking about what Dr. Guerrero did to me. Time doesn\u2019t necessarily heal that wound feel that by coming forward have done the right thing to make sure that this doesn\u2019t happen to other students.\u201d Victim Karissa Fenwick \u201cDespite damning investigation report they chose not to alert the faculty and students of their finding of Guerrero\u2019s unquestionable guilt on the part of their tenured professor and instead gave this dangerous sexual predator a slap on the wrist.\u201d Woodland Hill\u2019s Sexual Abuse Attorney John Winer Woodland Hills lawsuit has been filed by Woodland Hill\u2019s sexual abuse lawyer John Winer in Los Angeles Superior Court against charging that Dr. Erick Guerrero an associate professor at USC\u2019s Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work sexually harassed and abused his 34-year-old grad student Karissa Fenwick. When questioned by investigators Professor Guerrero described himself as the \u201cHot Latino Professor\u201d on campus and that his students were irresistibly attracted to. Dr. Guerrero claimed to have at least eight witnesses to this. However investigation found that not one of them supported his claim. Although USC\u2019s five-month investigation made findings that Guerrero violated their policies and acted inappropriately, he was given a \u201cslap on the wrist\u201d (one-semester suspension) and remains a professor 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 1/7 The suit charges that by allowing him to remain as an employee has ratified his conduct and has put other female students at risk of being sexually harassed and sexually assaulted by him. Woodland Hills Sexual Abuse Attorney John Winer stated, \u201d Karissa Fenwick is a 34-year-old grad student who was working towards her doctorate at USC\u2019s Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work was sexually harassed and assaulted by her professor, mentor and the man in charge of her dissertation, and thus her future career. Dr. Erik Guerrero has been in the ultimate position of power over Karissa and other young students for some seven years. After a five-month extensive investigation found that Professor Guerrero indeed had violated that power by luring Ms. Fenwick into a New Orleans\u2019s hotel room and sexually harassing and assaulting her. The same internal investigation determined that Dr. Guerrero then threatened to ruin Ms. Fenwick\u2019s future at the university in an attempt to prevent her from coming forward. And despite damning investigation report they chose not to alert the faculty and students of their finding of Guerrero\u2019s unquestionable guilt on the part of their tenured professor and instead gave this dangerous sexual predator a slap on the wrist.\u201d Dr. Guerrero victim Karissa Fenwick stated still can\u2019t stop thinking about what Dr. Guerrero did to me. Time doesn\u2019t necessarily heal that wound feel that by coming forward have done the right thing to make sure that this doesn\u2019t happen to other students.\u201d Fenwick goes on to say \u201cAfter being assaulted by someone with so much power over me, it has been difficult to recover. At times have found it impossible to focus on my education. Because of this experience, my work on my dissertation has been stalled, and I\u2019m worried won\u2019t be able to catch up enough to complete my Ph.D.\u201d \u201cIn a despicable act of victim shaming, in order to defend himself against Karissa\u2019s allegations, Guerrero made up a claim that Karissa as well as other students came on to him, describing himself as the Hot Latino Professor that his students were irresistibly attracted to. He claimed to have at least 8 witnesses to this. However, not one of them supported his bogus and defamatory claim.\u201d Attorney John Winer goes on to say, \u201cKarissa Fenwick reported sexual harassment and through a delayed investigation that didn\u2019t meet California\u2019s \u201cprompt investigation standard\u201d the University made a finding in Karissa Fenwick\u2019s favor. At that point, she should have been able to return to her work while Guerrero should have been fired or at least suspended. Instead Guerrero was allowed to remain on campus while Karissa had to stay at home, her career delayed, if not destroyed.\u201d \u201cThe most important thing any organization, including a University can do to prevent sexual harassment is, when there is a finding of sexual harassment, to let the entire University community know that the perpetrator has been found guilty, fired or severely disciplined and that the victim has been protected. That sends a powerful message that sexual harassment will not be tolerated and a victim will not be penalized for coming forward. That is how you stamp out sexual harassment. Here did the opposite. Karissa Fenwick has been penalized by having to stay away from Guerrero, while he has been allowed to continue in his position and up until the filing of this lawsuit, his sexual harassment and obstruction of justice has been kept secret,\u201d \u201cBy delaying justice and allowing Professor Guerrero to remain at and appear on campus any time he wants despite findings of sexual harassment and trying to prevent Karissa from coming forward has sent a terrible message to its students, faculty, administrators and alumni; if any of you come forward to report sexual harassment, the perpetrator\u2019s life will basically remain unchanged while your life will tumble into turmoil.\u201d \u201cWe have filed this lawsuit because still doesn\u2019t get it. You can\u2019t give someone who you found to have sexually harassed and assaulted a student in his hotel bedroom and then tried to prevent her from coming forward a slap on the wrist and keep even that meager discipline a secret from the School community. This sends a terrible message as the circumstances inevitably leak 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 2/7 out and rumors get started and facts get distorted. The University must send a strong message that sexual harassment will not be tolerated and victims will be protected. Since fumbled the opportunity to make this statement, we are filing this lawsuit has had serious problems recently with sexual harassment. Usually, organizational sexual harassment issues arise out of perpetrators feeling that they can get away with breaking the rules. Obviously, Guerrero felt that the rules didn\u2019t pertain to him and that he could get away with his sexual harassment by trying to intimidate Karissa from coming forward and when that didn\u2019t work, he could try to blame her, and when that didn\u2019t work he is challenging the entire internal process. The only way that Karissa will receive justice is by stepping out of the internal system and to rely on the civil justice system to level the playing field v. Fenwick Complaint doctoral student in social work at was assaulted and sexually harassed by her dissertation advisor while on a school/work related trip to New Orleans. She is 34 year old Karissa Fenwick. She made an internal complaint to the University and they investigated and made findings that she was, in fact, sexually harassed and the perpetrator, Dr. Guerrero attempted to use his influence over her to get her to not make a complaint. Despite these findings, Dr. Guerrero remained employed at USC. He then challenged the findings claiming that Karissa came on to him and that he was frequently pursued by female students and that he was known as the Hot Latino Professor. Despite providing 9 supposed witnesses to these defenses, not one of the witnesses supported him. Finally, the University administered terribly light discipline of basically a suspension for one semester. The lawsuit claims that the discipline should have been far more serious\u2014he should have been fired. This was the second time that he sexually harassed a student that we know about. Karissa has been forced to avoid campus while Dr. Guerrero continues to work for 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 3/7 Updates Students Urge Dean to Go Public on Case More than 30 doctoral students are now asking the dean from the Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work to address the recent sexual harassment claims against a social work professor. They are now partnering up with Dean Marylin Flynn to confront the unspoken challenge of ending sexual misconduct and abuse of power at the university. The group of students also said they will continue to work to advocate to administrators to reconsider the punishment against the accused professor and \u201cdevelop policy recommendations to improve transparency, institutional culture, and reporting and enforcement mechanisms.\u201d Students Blast USC\u2019s Handling of Sexual Harassment Case 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 4/7 Nearly 70 faculty members have signed a letter, questioning the university\u2019s handling of a PhD student\u2019s sexual harassment lawsuit against Social Work Professor Erick Guerrero. Students at the school of Social Work at came together claiming they do not feel safe. CONTACT: Attorney John D. Winer Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs Cell: (510) 604-4328 Mail: [email protected] Website: WMlawyers.com Media: Lee Houskeeper (415) 777-4700 Cell: (415) [email protected] If You Are Wronged, We Will Make It Right. Schedule Free Confidential Consultation At Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs, LLP, we empower our clients. We take on the largest law firms, toughest insurance defense lawyers and largest companies with confidence. * Bold text labels are required for submission | We practice in California only 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 5/7 Name Email City or Count Your Age Phone Brief description of your legal issue (We practice in California only) 0 of 6000 max characters have read the disclaimer. Privacy Policy Offices Throughout California, Including 1901 Harrison Street Suite 1100 Oakland 94612 Phone: (510) 200-0162 View Map 21700 Oxnard Street Suite 2070 Woodland Hills 91367 Phone: (818) 208-1999 View Map 580 California Street 16th Floor San Francisco 94104 Phone: (415) 212-4932 View Map 3000 El Camino Real Suite 200 Palo Alto 94306 Phone: (650) 200-1300 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 6/7 \u00a9 2025 by Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs, LLP. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap. View Map 5000 Birch Street West Tower, Suite 3000 Newport Beach 92660 Phone: (949) 264-8018 View Map 2029 Century Park East Suite 400N Los Angeles 90067 Phone: (323) 417-5909 View Map 1 2/22/25, 10:14 Professor Accused of Sexual Harassment | Winer, Burritt, Scott & Jacobs 7/7", "7822_109.pdf": "Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor The student who filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against a professor and responded to comments made by professor Erick Guerrero at a news conference Thursday. Karissa Fenwick, a doctoral student at the School of Social Work, filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the University and By TOM\u00c1S October 27, 2017 Karissa Fenwick, a doctoral student at the School of Social Work, and attorney John Winer spoke publicly about the allegations in Fenwick\u2019s lawsuit against and professor Erick Guerrero. Photo by Terry Nguyen | Daily Trojan [ content/uploads/2017/10/press-conference.jpg] \u2018Woke DEI\u2019 database identifies $10.6 million in research funds \u2018Harry Potter and the Cursed Child\u2019 is a feat of theatrical magic Savannah Tweedt marches to the beat of her own drum Students launch Hospitality Wrapped flags DEI- related terms in research projects \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 1/54 Guerrero, alleging did not impose disciplinary actions that she found sufficient after investigating a sexual harassment complaint she filed in January. During the press conference, Fenwick directly countered Guerrero\u2019s claim that she was taking advantage of \u201ca serious issue to continue her life of white privilege.\u201d \u201c[Guerrero] is twisting the concept [of white privilege] around to use it to defend his position when in fact, he not only had gender privilege but more importantly, he was my direct supervisor and controlled my future,\u201d Fenwick said. \u201cHe had a tremendous amount more power than did in this situation.\u201d On Wednesday, Guerrero filed a demurrer, which denied all the allegations in the suit. \u201cMany of the causes are very small false narratives, and then [the plaintiff] tries to create a significant base out of them,\u201d said Mark Hathaway, Guerrero\u2019s attorney don\u2019t think any reasonable person would read the complaint and think it was gender violence, retaliation or a hostile work environment.\u201d Emma Aguila, Guerrero\u2019s wife and an assistant professor at USC, stated support for her husband in an email to the Daily Trojan. \u201cErick values his reputation in our Trojan community and he has always been very careful in dealing with co-workers and students to avoid any Got a story idea Looking to advertise with us? Visit dailytrojan.com/ads \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 2/54 misunderstandings,\u201d Aguila wrote. \u201cWith all my heart stand by him believe in as a great institution and know the truth will prevail.\u201d In a letter sent to Guerrero on Sept. 7, Martin Levine, vice provost and senior adviser to the provost, notified Guerrero that he would be suspended from teaching doctoral students among other consequences starting Fall 2018. However, USC\u2019s statement to the Daily Trojan on Wednesday stated that he was barred from teaching and supervising students starting this academic year. The provost\u2019s office declined to comment on the change from the statement to the letter, since they are unable to discuss specific personnel issues. The letter to Guerrero also stated that there were multiple offenses. Following other issues with administrators and faculty members that have come to light over the past several months, the University created a task force that will oversee and implement workplace standards to prevent similar issues in the future, a spokesperson from the provost\u2019s office said new vice provost of leadership development and evaluation will also be established and will oversee hiring processes and the work environment, according to USC. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 3/54 While the University has made these changes to address the issues related to harassment and misconduct at the administrator and faculty level, some students at the Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work said they believe this is not enough. Robin Petering and Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, two doctoral students at the School of Social Work, created a group called Social Workers to End Rape Culture in response to the recent sexual harassment allegations against Guerrero. In a statement [ content/uploads/2017/10/Letter- from-School-of-Social-Work.pdf] Thursday, they announced their support for Fenwick and victims of sexual misconduct at USC. \u201cIt is unacceptable that a school of social work, grounded in the values of social justice and equity, would condone the actions of one of its tenured professors in perpetuating such a negative and unsafe culture,\u201d the statement read. \u201cThis coalition feels that the administration\u2019s response has demonstrated that they are not committed to maintaining a culture of safety, transparency and accountability in regards to sexual harassment and misconduct.\u201d According to Petering, the coalition has 60 former and current students and nine faculty members, but she expects these numbers to grow. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 4/54 Share this entry \ue8f3 \ue932 \ue805 \u201c[We want to] acknowledge and support Karissa in how brave she is,\u201d Petering said. \u201cThis is not easy to do. She took a big risk in an effort for a lot of people. We\u2019re here to support her and future students who could be victims of sexual harassment and assault.\u201d The Dean\u2019s office in the School of Social Work did not provide a comment at the time of publication NOTE: Some comments have been removed because they violate the Daily Trojan\u2019s comment policy: Mom with Greek Son October 30, 2017 at 12:03 hope this young lady finds peace and may suggest prayer is often the fastest way to find peace in almost every situation. 52 \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 5/54 All ladies should realize that when you enter a man\u2019s hotel room to do anything other than change the sheets, you are entering potentially dangerous territory. Sarah H. October 29, 2017 at 7:58 They will not read it because they are all bullies and want to see one side to the story. It\u2019s unfortunate if this is the graduate students the school is producing the school ranking! Savannah October 28, 2017 at 6:25 Dr. Guerrero is disciplined and always respectful of our academic community have been around him during conferences and he is reserved. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 6/54 Peter Schwartz October 29, 2017 at 1:27 Being respectful in public does not exclude you from being a sexual perpetuator in private. - Neither does being a father or being married- as is claiming. Julie October 29, 2017 at 6:08 He danced on a table in our doctoral theory class (which was irrelevant to the topic of discussion). That was neither \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 7/54 reserved\u2026 nor appropriate support Karissa and any other student who is the victim of sexual harrassment or assault. Sarah H. October 29, 2017 at 7:56 are you for real is that conside sexual assault too? \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 8/54 this is getting pathetic honestly and blown out of context. Just because he is a man he isn\u2019t allowed to be happy, dance and go near a female student Sarah H. October 29, 2017 at 7:56 AGREED! Seth M. October 28, 2017 at 4:24 \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 9/54 am very proud of Karissa for coming forward! That takes incredible courage and strength am confident will make the correct decision in not allowing sexual predators to remain working for this University in capacity stand in support of the countless faculty and students who have come together in support of Karissa and have demanded the termination of Dr. Guerrero. Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 5:54 truly hope you if you have heard these things you will report it to the school. That isn\u2019t right of her to making fun of others that way. StudentUSC October 28, 2017 at 5:47 understand students taking a \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 10/54 stance and trying to do the \u201cright\u201d thing. However, you fail to understand that this has not been proven in court yet. She has made allegations that he has backed up and had evidence against. However, the school still decided to do what they felt was necessary so that he would get some sort of punishment and she would not be dismissed. Everyone on here is taking this to an extreme and making statements that are very hurtful to people that know and respect Dr. Guerrero. It is unfair to ruin someone\u2019s career over \u201callegations.\u201d If students on here commenting are truly social workers then they should respect our code of ethics. Nothing\u2019s been proven, and at this point it could go ether way, and the court will decide this fairly. If this guy was truly a predator then \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 11/54 Seth M. October 28, 2017 at 4:12 Sarah think you haven\u2019t really researched we would hear of more cases coming out against him. HOWEVER, all we are hearing about within the school is how numerous faculty and students are supporting him as well. His own wife is supporting him too. If he was such an awful person it would not be so. We have heard things around campus about Karissa and other faculty members as well being \u201cinvolved.\u201d But would never point fingers on her, instead we will see what the court decides in due time. Do the right thing, and your mouth at this point am also a student in the program. This is bigger than all of us. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 12/54 what has transpired thus far. Karissa\u2019s allegations were backed up and decided to be true by a 5 month plus internal investigation. Dr. Guerrero tried to appeal the decision once found responsible by this investigation and submitted unsubstantiated claims and witnesses that didn\u2019t actually benefit him. His appeal was denied and the investigation concluded still in supported Karissa. Once that was determined the University levied some punishments against him to keep his involvement with students limited. This most believe was not enough and woefully inadequate, including the victim Karissa \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 13/54 who felt the only way to make serious change was to sue him and the school. Everyone (His peer faculty and students) are extremely upset with Dr. Guerrero\u2019s behavior and the schools lack of a more severe punishment. Unfortunately Dr. Guerrero was solely responsible for ruining his own career not all of the students and faculty and certainly not Karissa. The people commenting social workers at as recognize their names not hidden behind \u201cJohn Doe\u2019s\u201d or \u201cSarah H.\u2019s\u201d. This is not the time to stay silent and \u201cCLOSE\u201d our mouths. This is the time to stand up for whats right and speak out. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 14/54 Too much of sexual crime is kept secret and swept under the carpet. Its time that we stand up for strong people like Karissa. Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 5:59 First of all am an actual student at the school as well. So just because you do not agree with my statements does not give you the right to \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 15/54 harass my comment and make it seem as though am a fake person. For your information do know what is going on. Did you know that half of the information that was used against Dr. Guerrero was also made available to him until she filed the lawsuit against him? So whoever \u201cStudent X\u201d is was never even brought to his \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 16/54 attention. So pretty much any person who had an issue with him could have been interviewed by the school and made false accusations about him to bring him down. Were there video cameras that followed them that day at the conference? How can these accusations even be proven that she is making. Do you know \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 17/54 him personally to attack his character like this DONT. Well guess what do have taken classes with him, and he has mentored close friends of mine, so next time carefully think about what you are saying and for making it seem as though am a fake person YOU!? If \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 18/54 you are truly a social worker then you need to go read the code of ethics again. Just because you don\u2019t agree with what am saying doesn\u2019t give you the right to tear me down or others who support him. As said before MOUTH! Seth Maxw October 28, 2017 at 6:46 \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 19/54 So wait\u2026 because haven\u2019t been harasse and your haven\u2019t been harasse (thank goodnes this means that he didn\u2019t do it to anyone? Your logic is flawed. Let me make this simple The \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 20/54 ruled against him, all the faculty and doctoral student want him gone\u2026 but you Sarah know better than everyon Let me give you some advice as you sound really young and just starting in your career as a student Be careful \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 21/54 who you side with. Be careful how you present yourself on public forums. You never know who is reading this and how they may take your stateme Below is a link to a letter just publishe by the faculty of \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 22/54 the school of social work implore you to read it and really think about what is being said in the docume Then if you are feeling bold look at the signatur on the bottom of the letter and decide if \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 23/54 all those names mean somethi to you, to your future. Are they all wrong too? Mich October 29, 2017 at 11:17 You mean the Office of Equity and Divers They have as much legal credib as an \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 24/54 organi crime syndic Seth Maxw October 29, 2017 at 12:11 So Micha since you feel they have no credib would you think they would side with their faculty as to avoid suit and protec their interes includ lots \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 25/54 of fundin brough to the school by Dr. Guerre What are you trying to say? Or are you just interes in trying to make nonsen inflam statem believe those people are better known as trolls. Micha are you \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 26/54 a troll? Pete Schw October 29, 2017 at 1:24 It is clear\u2026 Profes Eric Guerre is \u201cMich \u201cSarah H.\u201d, \u201cJohn Doe\u201d. Sad and pathet Sara H. October 29, 2017 at 7:55 It is that \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 27/54 gradua studen of also like to harass others guess too. Just becaus you don\u2019t agree with what others have to say doesn\u2019 mean it\u2019s Profrs Guerre \u201chidin behind a screen Get a grib you \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 28/54 Seth Maxw October 30, 2017 at 11:32 Sarah\u2026 you should proofr your comm Don\u2019t know what a Profrs is or how to get a \u201cGrib\u201d If you want some help, I\u2019m sure the gradua studen could proofr your stuff for you. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 29/54 Maybe should paste your comm below for fear you might delete it again\u2026 or try and edit it to fix your typos. Pete Schw October 29, 2017 at 1:23 Well said. Mich \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 30/54 October 30, 2017 at 9:42 Your respon to Sarah sound extrem creepy and threat No wonde she delete her messa Are you threat a woma becaus she disagr with you and the money suckin vampi Lariss Sara H. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 31/54 October 30, 2017 at 10:19 That is exactly why delete it Micha And actuall blocke him too becaus he was telling me how to act for my future which was totally uncall for and consta accusi me of being Profes \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 32/54 Guerre which is plain wrong They are accusi him of sexual assaul yet their threat nature is bullyin and assaul at its finest. Seth Maxw October 30, 2017 at 11:28 Hey everyo look the troll is back! Anoth \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 33/54 great additio to this conver Thank Micha for your always intellig discou Mich October 31, 2017 at 1:05 What are you implyi Seth? \u201d Be carefu who you side with. Be carefu how you presen yourse on \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 34/54 public forum You never know who is readin this and how they may take your statem What are you going to do, thug? Why are you threat a woma with implic violen becaus she disagr with your money suckin schem \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 35/54 Seth Maxw October 31, 2017 at 6:45 Micha want to thank you for all the exposu you are giving this impor article The more your type your troll comm the more exposu this article gets. Please contin \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 36/54 to share and suppo this impor inform know how impor it is for you to make sure strong people like Kariss get their voices heard. Thank Peter Schwartz October 29, 2017 at 1:22 AGREED. Robin Petering \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 37/54 October 27, 2017 at 7:23 #iamstudentX Zoe Nicholson October 27, 2017 at 4:21 It seems that many institutions have hidden their unacceptable standards and are now being forced into daylight by such a discovery. That being said am truly dismayed that would not have set the example years ago of zero tolerance on the issues of sexual assault. This student is performing a service for everyone by shining a light on the unthinkable circumstance that a discovered faculty member only has to face a fine and reprimand. Sexual assault must not be tolerated for anyone in this community; faculty, students, administration and workers earned a in \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 38/54 Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 6:01 That makes no sense, if the school sets that type of policy student then can make claims against their professor and have that professor fired over simple \u201callegations.\u201d theres no hard evidence against him, no proof of sexual relations, nothing. You are making him out to be a predator when you are a stranger and no nothing about what\u2019s happened on the inside and Ethics at and feel certain this would have been our only topic until it was rectified with a zero tolerance policy. Time to do better, USC. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 39/54 what we are dealing with as students at the school. Please go away and use your words correctly! If a student gets a grade they aren\u2019t happy with, they can then make claims against the professor that he or she sexually harassed them and then get that professor fired because of the \u201czero tolerance\u201d policy to your words. There are people who will always try to take advantage of the system. The school is doing the best they can to deal with this to not harm either parties until it is decided fairly. Beth Gaona October 27, 2017 at 4:08 Shame on for minimizing Dr. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 40/54 Guerrero\u2019s disturbing and dangerous act of sexual violence stand beside Karissa and Student as well as other students on our campus who have been and are currently victims of sexual violence. This behavior is unacceptable! Chris Ortiz October 27, 2017 at 3:53 You clearly know nothing about her and are a cowardly pathetic troll, who can\u2019t even come up with a better screenname to hide behind. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 41/54 John Doe October 27, 2017 at 4:00 You are a naive and fanatical troll who knows nothing about the inner workings of USC\u2019s Title process and the ideological madness behind these witch hunts. Have you ever seen a female professor or administrator punished for ANYTHING? And in case you missed the memo, Karissa is suing the school and the professor for MONEY. Andrea Lane Eastman October 27, 2017 at 6:14 The one transparent thing about \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 42/54 this whole process is who is posting as John Doe. An army stands behind Karissa because we are so fortunate to know and love her. John Doe October 27, 2017 at 7:19 Yes am aware an \u201carmy\u201d is standing behind her. That\u2019s the point. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 43/54 believe the technica correct term is \u201cmob,\u201d though. You know what Ibsen said about moraliz zealots like you minority may be right, but the majority is always wrong.\u201d You are wrong. Laur October 27, 2017 at 7:58 \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 44/54 #iams Sara H. October 28, 2017 at 5:56 DR. Erick Guerre Robin Petering October 27, 2017 at 7:26 This is Karissa\u2019s money Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 5:52 Everyon needs \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 45/54 to calm down. Nothing been proven yet. There are also many faculty and student at the school who support and admire Dr. Guerrer and believe in him. Go read the court docume It\u2019s clear she had some sort of crush on \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 46/54 him and was devastat when she found out his wife was pregnan You need to stop treating him like he is a \u201csexual predato when nothing been decided CODE. Seth M. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 47/54 October 28, 2017 at 4:17 Dr. Guerrero mean John Doe\u2026.Come out of the shadows and show your true self. Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 6:29 If he mentioned his real name your \u201carmy\u201d would go after him Alumni October 27, 2017 at 3:52 stand with Karissa, \u2018Student X,\u2019 and anyone else who has experienced this at the hands of predators like Dr. Guerrero feel sorry for his wife and child who are also victims in this. Dean Flynn and President Nikas \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 48/54 Sarah H. October 28, 2017 at 6:06 You feel sorry for his wife and child?? If you did you would not ask for his dismissal. His wife is supporting him through this process. It\u2019s clear you are a stranger and nothing about what is going on in the inside. Take your negative comments elsewhere instead of trying to ruin need to sober up and realize that they have aided in the continuation and creation of a toxic misogynistic culture at USC. They can fix this and the first step is the dismissal of predators like Dr. Guerrero, no matter how much grant monies they bring to USC. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 49/54 someone\u2019s life over false allegations made against him am one of his female students and have seen anything wrong on his part or unfair treatment of females. Do not try to act moral when your comments state otherwise. Chris Ortiz October 27, 2017 at 3:49 Karissa is such a strong and brave person for speaking out! She is standing up for not only herself but for other students who otherwise would be vulnerable to his predatory and reprehensible behavior! #StandWithKarissa \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 50/54 Beth Gaona October 27, 2017 at 4:13 #StandWithKarissa! Robin Petering October 27, 2017 at 7:24 #IamStudent Wichada La Motte-Kerr October 27, 2017 at 3:40 The school needs to step up and meet its obligation to make its students feel safe. No one is deserving of sexual harassment and everyone should be safe, secure, and supported in the environment where they learn or work. The punishment does not fit the crime the university itself found him guilty of stand in solidarity with Karissa, other surivivors, and the coalitation, Social \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 51/54 joe nikolas October 30, 2017 at 11:22 so i suppose the million she is asking for will make her feel a little safer Workers to End Rape Culture. John Doe October 27, 2017 at 3:27 Virtue signalling and mob lynching. *Yawn* Matthew Zavala October 27, 2017 at 3:19 This is not right am currently a second year graduate student at this school. This goes against our values as Social Workers stand with Karrisa, \u201cVictim X\u201d , and anyone else that Guerrero has \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 52/54 wronged. We need answers yesterday. Cary Klemmer October 27, 2017 at 2:59 stand unequivocally with all survivors. Karissa thank you so deeply for starting the steps toward change that will see so many people protected. Molly Sullivan October 27, 2017 at 2:53 Solidarity with Karissa am a current 2nd year student and am shocked by Dean Flynn and the school\u2019s lack of transparency and accountability on this issue. We all deserve a safe learning environment. Allowing someone accused of such serious allegations to continue teaching students is unacceptable! \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 53/54 Comments are closed. Michael October 29, 2017 at 10:36 Yeah, \u201csuch serious allegations.\u201d Apparently he danced on a table WITCH! StudentUSC October 27, 2017 at 12:20 Happy to see he has the support of his wife, it shows what an honest man he is! \u00a9 University of Southern California/Daily Trojan. All rights reserved. \ue8f3 \ue932 \uf16a \uf16d \ue853 \ue805 2/22/25, 10:14 Student addresses sexual harassment allegations against professor - Daily Trojan 54/54", "7822_110.pdf": "( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 1/79 Erick Guerrero is one of 262 celebrities, politicians, CEOs, and others who have been accused of sexual misconduct since April 2017 DOM\u00cdNGUEZ C\u00c1RDENAS D\u00cdAZ 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 2/79 Updated: Jan. 9, 2019 Update July 16, 2021: This list was created in 2017 as a way to represent the scope of the Me Too movement. Though the list, compiled from news reports, could never be exhaustive, the goal was to document the range of people across industries who were the subject of sexual misconduct reports. The list was updated periodically until February 2020; it has not been updated since then. In the intervening period, some of the people on this list have faced legal or professional consequences, while in other cases, further action was not supported or taken. While the Me Too movement continues to have an impact, this list is not an ongoing record of allegations and their outcomes; rather, it is meant as a snapshot of a particular moment in time. The list was updated periodically until February 2020, and is no longer being updated regularly. Harvey Weinstein. Mario Batali. Louis C.K. As the Me Too movement gained prominence, more than 250 powerful people \u2014 celebrities ( spacey-sexual-assault-allegations-house-of-cards), politicians ( moore-republican-party), CEOs ( sexual-misconduct-terdema-ussery-earl-k-sneed-mark-cuban), and others \u2014 were the subject of sexual harassment ( politics/2017/4/19/15361182/bill-oreilly-fox-harassment-allegations-fired), assault ( weinstein-sexual-harassment-assault-accusations), or other misconduct ( thrush-new-york-times) allegations. At the movement\u2019s height, more survivors came forward nearly every day, many of them inspired and emboldened by those who had gone before. Vox compiled a list of influential people from a variety of industries who faced new public accusations of sexual misconduct after Fox News host Bill O\u2019Reilly was forced to resign in April 2017. The list was updated periodically until January 2019, and is no longer being updated regularly. We decided to start our list with O\u2019Reilly because his departure from Fox helped set the stage for reports against Harvey Weinstein \u2014 which, in turn, helped raise awareness around the Me Too movement ( harvey-weinstein-harassment-assault) and kick off the reckoning around sexual misconduct that continues to this day, in Hollywood ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 3/79 harassment-hollywood-metoo), Washington ( and-politics/2018/1/30/16933376/congress-sexual-harassment-fix-bill), and around the country. Many (though not all) of the people accused have denied the allegations. Some say the reported behavior never happened, while others argue that their behavior was not intended to be sexual. Those who reported they were harassed, assaulted, or subjected to misconduct, however, have often said it affected them deeply, leaving some with lasting trauma and sometimes forcing them from their chosen careers. The Me Too movement and its impact ( movement-sexual-harassment-law-2019) are ongoing, and the list below is only a snapshot of the allegations that became public during a particular moment in time. Click to view the accused in the following fields: Arts & Entertainment 101 Media 57 Business & Tech 18 Politics 46 Other 40 Arts & Entertainment There are 101 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported December 2018 Frankie Shaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/frankie-shaw) Michael Weatherly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-weatherly) September 2018 Steven Wilder Striegel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steven-wilder-striegel) August 2018 Gerard Depardieu (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/gerard-depardieu) Chase Finlay (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chase-finlay) Asia Argento (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/asia-argento) July 2018 Rick Day (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rick-day) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 4/79 June 2018 Chris Hardwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-hardwick) May 2018 Morgan Freeman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/morgan-freeman) Luc Besson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/luc-besson) Boyd Tinsley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/boyd-tinsley) Ameer Vann (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ameer-vann) Junot D\u00edaz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/junot-diaz) April 2018 Allison Mack (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/allison-mack) Nicholas Nixon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nicholas-nixon) March 2018 John Kricfalusi (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-kricfalusi) Sherman Alexie (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sherman-alexie) February 2018 Jeff Franklin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff-franklin) Philip Berk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/philip-berk) Daniel Handler (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/daniel-handler) Patrick Demarchelier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-demarchelier) Seth Sabal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/seth-sabal) Andre Passos (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andre-passos) Greg Kadel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/greg-kadel) David Bellemere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-bellemere) Karl Templer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/karl-templer) Vincent Cirrincione (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/vincent-cirrincione) Paul Marciano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-marciano) January 2018 Charlie Walk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-walk) Scott Baio (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/scott-baio) David Copperfield (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-copperfield) Barry Lubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/barry-lubin) Michael Douglas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-douglas) Joel Kramer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/joel-kramer) Bruce Weber (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bruce-weber) Mario Testino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mario-testino) Aziz Ansari (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/aziz-ansari) James Franco (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-franco) Stan Lee (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/stan-lee) Ben Vereen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ben-vereen) Paul Haggis (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-haggis) Albert Schultz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/albert-schultz) Dan Harmon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dan-harmon) December 2017 Dustin Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dustin-marshall) T.J. Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-j-miller) Morgan Spurlock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/morgan-spurlock) Jon Heely (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jon-heely) Melanie Martinez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/melanie-martinez) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 5/79 Bryan Singer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bryan-singer) Peter Martins (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/peter-martins) James Levine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-levine) November 2017 Israel Horovitz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/israel-horovitz) Geoffrey Rush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/geoffrey-rush) Jean-Claude Arnault (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jean-claude-arnault) John Lasseter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-lasseter) Murray Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/murray-miller) Sylvester Stallone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sylvester-stallone) Ron Jeremy (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron-jeremy) Andy Henry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-henry) Jesse Lacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jesse-lacey) Tom Sizemore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-sizemore) Mark Schwahn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-schwahn) Peter Aalb\u00e6k Jensen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/peter-aalbaek-jensen) Eddie Berganza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eddie-berganza) Richard Dreyfuss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/richard-dreyfuss) Gary Goddard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/gary-goddard) Andrew Kreisberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrew-kreisberg) George Takei (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-takei) Steven Seagal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steven-seagal) Louis C.K. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/louis-c-k) Matthew Weiner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matthew-weiner) Russell Simmons (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/russell-simmons) Robert Knepper (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-knepper) Jeffrey Tambor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeffrey-tambor) Ed Westwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-westwick) Adam Venit (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/adam-venit) Danny Masterson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/danny-masterson) Nick Carter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nick-carter) Brett Ratner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brett-ratner) Dustin Hoffman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dustin-hoffman) October 2017 Andy Dick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-dick) Jeremy Piven (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeremy-piven) Kevin Spacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kevin-spacey) Kirt Webster (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kirt-webster) Ken Baker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken-baker) Ethan Kath (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ethan-kath) James Toback (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-toback) David Blaine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-blaine) Chris Savino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-savino) Bob Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bob-weinstein) Tyler Grasham (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tyler-grasham) Lars von Trier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lars-von-trier) Roy Price (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy-price) Oliver Stone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/oliver-stone) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 6/79 Ben Affleck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ben-affleck) Nelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nelly) Harvey Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harvey-weinstein) August 2017 Hadrian Belove (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/hadrian-belove) Shadie Elnashai (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/shadie-elnashai) Roman Polanski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roman-polanski) July 2017 Robert \"R.\" Kelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-r-kelly) Media There are 57 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported August 2018 Les Moonves (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/les-moonves) July 2018 Kimberly Guilfoyle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kimberly-guilfoyle) Antonin Kratochvil (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/antonin-kratochvil) Christian Rodriguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/christian-rodriguez) April 2018 Tom Brokaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-brokaw) March 2018 Michael Ferro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-ferro) February 2018 Alex Jones (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex-jones) Ryan Seacrest (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan-seacrest) Daniel Zwerdling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/daniel-zwerdling) January 2018 Patrick Witty (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-witty) Dayan Candappa (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dayan-candappa) Robert Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-moore) Ross Levinsohn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ross-levinsohn) James Rosen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/james-rosen) Kevin Braun (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kevin-braun) Steve Butts (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-butts) H. Brandt Ayers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/h-brandt-ayers) December 2017 Adrian Carrasquillo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/adrian-carrasquillo) Andrew Creighton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrew-creighton) Mike Germano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mike-germano) Rhys James (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rhys-james) Jason Mojica (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jason-mojica) Don Hazen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/don-hazen) Leonard Lopate (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/leonard-lopate) Jonathan Schwartz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jonathan-schwartz) Tavis Smiley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tavis-smiley) Ryan Lizza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan-lizza) Marshall Faulk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/marshall-faulk) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 7/79 Ike Taylor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ike-taylor) Heath Evans (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/heath-evans) Eric Weinberger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-weinberger) Donovan McNabb (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/donovan-mcnabb) Tom Ashbrook (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-ashbrook) Dylan Howard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dylan-howard) Lorin Stein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lorin-stein) John Hockenberry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-hockenberry) November 2017 Matt Lauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-lauer) Garrison Keillor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/garrison-keillor) Charlie Rose (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-rose) Glenn Thrush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/glenn-thrush) Matt Zimmerman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-zimmerman) Kaj Larsen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kaj-larsen) Vince Ingenito (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/vince-ingenito) Jann Wenner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jann-wenner) Michael Hafford (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-hafford) David Corn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-corn) October 2017 Michael Oreskes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-oreskes) Hamilton Fish (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/hamilton-fish) Mark Halperin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-halperin) Leon Wieseltier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/leon-wieseltier) Knight Landesman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/knight-landesman) Lockhart Steele (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lockhart-steele) September 2017 Harry Knowles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harry-knowles) Charles Payne (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charles-payne) August 2017 Eric Bolling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-bolling) April 2017 Sean Hannity (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sean-hannity) Bill O'Reilly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill-o-reilly) Business & Tech There are 18 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported October 2018 Andy Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-rubin) Richard DeVaul (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/richard-devaul) Amit Singhal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/amit-singhal) August 2018 Demos Parneros (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/demos-parneros) February 2018 Terdema Ussery (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/terdema-ussery) January 2018 Steve Wynn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-wynn) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 8/79 December 2017 Max Ogden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/max-ogden) Harold Ford Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/harold-ford-jr) Sam Isaly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sam-isaly) November 2017 Shervin Pishevar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/shervin-pishevar) Howie Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/howie-rubin) October 2017 Caleb Jennings (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/caleb-jennings) Robert Scoble (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-scoble) Scott Courtney (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/scott-courtney) June 2017 Chris Sacca (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/chris-sacca) Dave McClure (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dave-mcclure) Justin Caldbeck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/justin-caldbeck) Travis Kalanick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/travis-kalanick) Politics There are 46 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported November 2018 Eric Bauman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-bauman) October 2018 Albert J. Alvarez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/albert-j-alvarez) September 2018 Charles Schwertner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charles-schwertner) Brett Kavanaugh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brett-kavanaugh) David Keyes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-keyes) August 2018 Tom Frieden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tom-frieden) Nick Sauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nick-sauer) July 2018 Corey Coleman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/corey-coleman) Mel Watt (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mel-watt) Curtis Hill (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/curtis-hill) May 2018 Eric Schneiderman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-schneiderman) Clay Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/clay-johnson) April 2018 Tony C\u00e1rdenas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tony-cardenas) Benton Strong (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/benton-strong) Benjamin Sparks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/benjamin-sparks) February 2018 Nicholas Kettle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nicholas-kettle) Ed Crane (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-crane) Cristina Garcia (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cristina-garcia) January 2018 Burns Strider (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/burns-strider) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 9/79 Patrick Meehan (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/patrick-meehan) Jeffrey Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeffrey-klein) Eric Greitens (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric-greitens) December 2017 Corey Lewandowski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/corey-lewandowski) Andrea Ramsey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andrea-ramsey) Bobby Scott (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bobby-scott) Ed Murray (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed-murray) Dan Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dan-johnson) Alex Kozinski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex-kozinski) Trent Franks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/trent-franks) Borris Miles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/borris-miles) Carlos Uresti (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/carlos-uresti) Matt Dababneh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/matt-dababneh) Rub\u00e9n Kihuen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ruben-kihuen) November 2017 Blake Farenthold (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/blake-farenthold) John Conyers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-conyers) Wesley Goodman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/wesley-goodman) Al Franken (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/al-franken) Jeff Kruse (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff-kruse) Calvin Smyre (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/calvin-smyre) Steve Lebsock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/steve-lebsock) Roy Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy-moore) Dwayne Duron Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/dwayne-duron-marshall) Tony Mendoza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/tony-mendoza) October 2017 Raul Bocanegra (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/raul-bocanegra) George H.W. Bush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-h-w-bush) Donald Trump (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/donald-trump) Other There are 40 people in this category. Select a name or scroll down to view all: Publicly reported September 2018 Cody Wilson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cody-wilson) August 2018 Ron Carlson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron-carlson) Avital Ronell (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/avital-ronell) June 2018 Francisco Ayala (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/francisco-ayala) Mark Mellor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mark-mellor) May 2018 Roland G. Fryer, Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roland-g-fryer-jr) George Tyndall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/george-tyndall) April 2018 William Jacoby (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-jacoby) March 2018 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 10/79 William Strampel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-strampel) Keith Raniere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/keith-raniere) Bill Hybels (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill-hybels) Robert Reece (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/robert-reece) Mike Isabella (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mike-isabella) February 2018 Jorge Dom\u00ednguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jorge-dominguez) Lawrence Krauss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/lawrence-krauss) Michael Feinberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/michael-feinberg) Earl K. Sneed (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/earl-k-sneed) Sean Hutchison (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sean-hutchison) Alec Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alec-klein) January 2018 Paul Shapiro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-shapiro) Wayne Pacelle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/wayne-pacelle) John Kenneally (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-kenneally) Mohamed Muqtar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mohamed-muqtar) Jeremy Tooker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeremy-tooker) Andy Savage (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy-savage) December 2017 Charlie Hallowell (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/charlie-hallowell) Brad Kern (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/brad-kern) Ken Friedman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken-friedman) Mario Batali (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mario-batali) November 2017 Larry Nassar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/larry-nassar) Andr\u00e9 Balazs (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andre-balazs) October 2017 Todd Heatherton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/todd-heatherton) William Kelley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/william-kelley) Paul Whalen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/paul-whalen) Erick Guerrero (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/erick-guerrero) John Besh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/john-besh) David Marchant (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/david-marchant) September 2017 T. Florian Jaeger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-florian-jaeger) April 2017 Cristiano Ronaldo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/cristiano-ronaldo) October 2014 Neil deGrasse Tyson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/neil-degrasse-tyson) Back to 1 / 101 Frankie Shaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/frankie-shaw) Creator and star, Showtime's Publicly reported December 17, 2018 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 11/79 Multiple staffers have said she mishandled sex scenes, and one says she took off her own shirt in a dispute over onscreen nudity. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cShe uses this idea of being feminist and a progressive as camouflage.\u201d \u2014 anonymous staffer ( claims-1170077) Michael Weatherly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-weatherly) Actor, CBS's Bull Publicly reported December 13, 2018 co-star says he made inappropriate comments to her, including a rape joke. After she confronted him, she was written off the show. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cMy story is true and it\u2019s really affected me.\u201d \u2014 Eliza Dushku, actress ( harassment.html) Steven Wilder Striegel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/steven-wilder-striegel) Actor Publicly reported September 6, 2018 woman has said he sexually abused her when she was 14. He pleaded guilty to two felonies in 2010 in connection with the allegations, and served six months in jail. 20th Century Fox has deleted a scene featuring him from The Predator. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( story.html have no shame for what was done to me am not the one who needs to carry that shame.\u201d \u2014 Paige Carnes, who reported that Striegel abused her ( 20180912-story.html) Gerard Depardieu (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/gerard-depardieu) Actor Publicly reported August 30, 2018 An actress has said he raped her. French authorities are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThe actress told police she had been assaulted by the actor twice this month at Depardieu\u2019s home in Paris.\u201d \u2014 the New York Magazine vertical The Cut ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 12/79 Chase Finlay (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chase-finlay) Former principal dancer, New York City Ballet Publicly reported August 28, 2018 woman said he shared naked pictures of her without her consent. He has left the New York City Ballet. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[Finlay] had been secretly recording and saving explicit photographs and videos of [Alexandra Waterbury] while she was without clothing and/or while the two were engaged in sexual activities.\u201d \u2014 lawsuit filed by Alexandra Waterbury against New York City Ballet ( Asia Argento (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/asia-argento) Actress, director, #MeToo advocate Publicly reported August 19, 2018 man says she sexually assaulted him when he was 17. She has been fired from Factor Italy. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( utm_source=twitter) 3 ( \u201cMy trauma resurfaced as she came out as a victim herself.\u201d \u2014 Jimmy Bennett, actor ( assault-claim-1136667?utm_source=twitter) Rick Day (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/rick- day) Photographer Publicly reported July 24, 2018 Multiple men have reported sexual assault or other sexual misconduct by Day during photo shoots. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( [Day] \u201cgot way too handsy on just about every part of my body.\u201d \u2014 Zach Zakar, model ( assault/#gs.Eq88fT8) Chris Hardwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-hardwick) Co-founder, Nerdist; host, Talking with Chris Hardwick Publicly reported June 14, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted and emotionally abused her suspended his show, but has reinstated it after an investigation. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 13/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cI\u2019m still recovering from being sexually used.\u201d \u2014 Chloe Dykstra, actress ( Morgan Freeman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/morgan-freeman) Actor; co-founder, Revelations Entertainment Publicly reported May 24, 2018 Eight women have alleged sexual harassment and \u201cinappropriate behavior,\u201d including sexually charged remarks and unwanted touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cWe knew that if he was coming by \u2026 not to wear any top that would show our breasts, not to wear anything that would show our bottoms.\u201d \u2014 senior production staff member on the film Now You See Me ( freeman-accusations/index.html) Luc Besson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/luc- besson) Director Publicly reported May 19, 2018 Multiple people have said he raped, sexually assaulted, or sexually harassed them. French police are investigating the rape allegation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( became his private Barbie doll whom he could control, dress and break.\u201d \u2014 Sand Van Roy, actress ( france-1202869487/) Boyd Tinsley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/boyd-tinsley) Violinist; former member, Dave Matthews Band; member, Crystal Garden Publicly reported May 17, 2018 man has sued Tinsley, saying Tinsley subjected him to unwanted touching and masturbated in front of him, among other unwanted behavior, while they were bandmates in Crystal Garden. Tinsley has been fired from the Dave Matthews Band. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[H]e was masturbating next to me while was sleeping, and he had his hand on my ass\u201d \u2014 James Frost-Winn, trumpet player ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 14/79 Ameer Vann (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ameer-vann) Rapper; former member, Brockhampton Publicly reported May 11, 2018 Two women have said he was verbally abusive or emotionally manipulative to them in relationships, and others have made secondhand allegations that he had sex with underage girls. He has since left Brockhampton and the group has issued an apology. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cNot only is he a predator and cheater, he also degrades women\u201d \u2014 Rhett Rowan, singer-songwriter ( allegations/) Junot D\u00edaz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/junot-diaz) Author; creative writing professor Publicly reported May 4, 2018 woman has reported that he forcibly kissed her, and others have said he subjected them to misogynistic or verbally abusive behavior. He has resigned as chair of the Pulitzer Prize Board, and has launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( was an unknown wide-eyed 26 yo, and he used it as an opportunity to corner and forcibly kiss me.\u201d \u2014 Zinzi Clemmons, author ( Allison Mack (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/allison-mack) Actress Publicly reported April 24, 2018 She has been charged with sex trafficking in connection with allegations that she recruited women to become \u201cslaves\u201d in the group Nxivm. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cMs. Mack was one of the top members of a highly organized scheme which was designed to provide sex to [Nxivm co-founder Keith Raniere]\" \u2014 assistant attorney Moira Penza ( know.html) Nicholas Nixon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nicholas-nixon) Photographer; former photography professor, Massachusetts College of Art and Design 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 15/79 Publicly reported April 4, 2018 Multiple former students have said that Nixon made inappropriate comments, sent them inappropriate emails, or asked them to pose nude. He has retired from MassArt and is the subject of a Title investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( far/9O4Yyd0CBlGSiW33Tb8tcI/story.html) 2 ( \u201cIt felt like the conversation always led back to sex.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Boston Globe ( classroom-how-far-too-far/9O4Yyd0CBlGSiW33Tb8tcI/story.html) John Kricfalusi (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-kricfalusi) Creator, The Ren & Stimpy Show Publicly reported March 29, 2018 One woman has said Kricfalusi sexually abused her when she was a minor, while another says he subjected her to sexually inappropriate behavior when she was a minor and later sexually harassed her. Cartoon Network and Adult Swim have said they will not work with him in future. Sources/more info: 1 ( bftwnews&utm_term=.ffGE92N2A#.whxjWOpO0) \u201cMy entire life had been suspended in John\u2019s since was fourteen.\u201d \u2014 Robyn Byrd, professor ( bftwnews&utm_term=.ffGE92N2A#.whxjWOpO0) Sherman Alexie (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sherman-alexie) Author Publicly reported March 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or unwanted advances toward them. He has declined a literary prize and delayed the publication of an upcoming memoir. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( declines-literary-prize) 3 ( amid-sexual-harassment-claims [\u2026] felt that he had so much power that should probably not make a fuss about this.\u201d \u2014 Elissa Washuta, author ( the-record) Jeff Franklin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeff-franklin) Former showrunner, Fuller House Publicly reported February 28, 2018 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 16/79 He has been accused of making inappropriate comments about his sex life in the workplace, and giving women he dated bit parts on Fuller House. He has been dropped from the show, and his deal with Warner Bros. will not be renewed. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cStudio executives were warned that Franklin \u2018was a walking lawsuit waiting to happen.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Cynthia Littleton, Variety ( Philip Berk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/philip-berk) Former president, Hollywood Foreign Press Association Publicly reported February 22, 2018 man has reported that Berk groped him. The is investigating the incident. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt ill felt like a little kid felt like there was a ball in my throat thought was going to cry.\u201d \u2014 Brendan Fraser, actor ( Daniel Handler (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/daniel-handler) Author, also known as Lemony Snicket Publicly reported February 21, 2018 Multiple women say he made inappropriate sexual comments in front of and about them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt was way over the line, and made me feel smaller.\u201d \u2014 Allie Jane Bruce, children's librarian ( metoo) Patrick Demarchelier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/patrick-demarchelier) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them. The magazine publisher Cond\u00e9 Nast has stopped working with him \u201cfor the foreseeable future.\u201d Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt hurts my heart so much to think of how many girls, many my own daughter\u2019s age who have had to fend off or give in to his advances because didn\u2019t speak up at the time.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, in an email to a modeling group ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Seth Sabal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/seth- sabal) Photographer 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 17/79 Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cThree models have accused Sabal of sexual harassment during the mid-2000s.\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Andre Passos (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andre-passos) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 woman has said he inserted his fingers into her vagina during a shoot when she was a teenager. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cFormer model Dasha Alexander said she was 15 when he inserted his fingers in her vagina while taking her picture about 20 years ago, saying it would give the photos \u2018more emotion.'\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Greg Kadel (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/greg-kadel) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances when they were teenagers, while another said he pressured her to strip naked. Cond\u00e9 Nast and Victoria\u2019s Secret have stopped working with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cKadel helped the teenager land gig after gig with Victoria\u2019s Secret, all while subjecting her to ongoing harassment, she said, until she refused to work with him\u201d \u2014 Jenn Abelson and Sacha Pfeiffer, Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) David Bellemere (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-bellemere) Photographer Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to unwanted touching and other inappropriate behavior. Victoria\u2019s Secret has cut ties with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 18/79 felt like had no choices.\u201d \u2014 Madisyn Ritland, model ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Karl Templer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/karl-templer) Stylist Publicly reported February 16, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he touched them inappropriately or aggressively during shoots. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe was trying to get me naked. [\u2026] He was trying to pull off my clothes without my permission.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Boston Globe ( truth/c7r0WVsF5cib1pLWXJe9dP/story.html) Vincent Cirrincione (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/vincent-cirrincione) Talent manager Publicly reported February 2, 2018 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them, and several said he preyed specifically on young women of color. He has shut down his agency. Sources/more info: 1 ( women-are-accusing-him-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/02/259e8196-f590-11e7-b34a-b85626af34ef_story.html? utm_term=.3c5fd3c7283a) 2 ( close-agency-after-accusations-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/05/557debd0-0ab8-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html? utm_term=.48f8a9e3ec1b) \u201cThe price paid for having my good professional relationship with him was giving up my sense of self, of wholeness, of personal worth.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( henson-to-stardom-now-9-minority-women-are-accusing-him-of-sexual-harassment/2018/02/02/259e8196-f590-11e7-b34a- b85626af34ef_story.html?utm_term=.3c5fd3c7283a) Paul Marciano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/paul-marciano) Co-founder, Guess Publicly reported February 1, 2018 woman has reported that he repeatedly subjected her to unwanted touching, kissing, and other advances. He has stepped away from daily responsibilities at Guess. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 19/79 \u201cIt took a huge toll on my confidence and self-worth wanted to quit modeling.\u201d \u2014 Kate Upton, model ( Charlie Walk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charlie-walk) Former president, the Republic Group Publicly reported January 29, 2018 Multiple women have accused him of harassment and inappropriate touching. He has left the Republic Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cYou would instant message me throughout the day making sexual remarks. Truly vulgar words and ideas. Pervasively.\u201d \u2014 Tristan Coopersmith, psychotherapist ( Scott Baio (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/scott-baio) Actor Publicly reported January 27, 2018 woman has reported that Baio sexually abused her when she was a minor, and a man has said Baio sexually harassed him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe was playing not only on my emotions, but my hormones and all of those things.\u201d \u2014 Nicole Eggert, actress ( 1202681478/) David Copperfield (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-copperfield) Magician Publicly reported January 25, 2018 woman has reported that he drugged and sexually assaulted her when she was 17. Sources/more info: 1 ( remember my clothes being taken off.\u201d \u2014 Brittney Lewis, former model ( 1988/) Barry Lubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/barry-lubin) Former clown, Big Apple Circus 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 20/79 Publicly reported January 23, 2018 woman has reported that he pressured her to pose for pornographic photos when she was 16. He has resigned from the Big Apple Circus. Sources/more info: 1 ( just felt really confused and lost and ashamed.\u201d \u2014 Zoey Dunne, former circus performer ( resigns.html?smid=tw-nytmetro&smtyp=cur) Michael Douglas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-douglas) Actor Publicly reported January 18, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her and masturbated in front of her. Sources/more info: 1 ( realized he thought he could do anything he wanted because he was so much more powerful than was.\u201d \u2014 Susan Braudy, writer ( moment-1075609) Joel Kramer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/joel-kramer) Stunt coordinator Publicly reported January 13, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually abused her when she was underage, and another says he sexually assaulted her. He has been dropped as a client by Worldwide Production Agency. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 1202243097 was 12, he was 36. It is incomprehensible.\u201d \u2014 Eliza Dushku, actress ( Bruce Weber (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bruce-weber) Photographer Publicly reported January 13, 2018 Multiple men have said he pressured them to pose nude or subjected them to unwanted touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( felt helpless. [\u2026] Like my agency said, he has a lot of power.\u201d \u2014 **Josh Ardolf, model ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 21/79 Mario Testino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mario-testino) Photographer Publicly reported January 13, 2018 Multiple men have said he groped them or masturbated in front of them, or made unwanted advances. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe was a sexual predator.\u201d \u2014 Ryan Locke, model ( Aziz Ansari (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/aziz- ansari) Actor, comedian Publicly reported January 13, 2018 woman has said he subjected her to unwanted touching and pressure to have sex during a date. Sources/more info: 1 ( cried the whole ride home. At that point felt violated.\u201d \u2014 Grace, to Babe.net ( James Franco (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-franco) Actor; founder, Studio 4 film school Publicly reported January 11, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he engaged in inappropriate or sexually exploitative behavior with them. Sources/more info: 1 ( feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable.\u201d \u2014 Sarah Tither-Kaplan, actress and filmmaker ( 20180111-htmlstory.html) Stan Lee (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/stan- lee) Comic book writer; former editor-in-chief, Marvel Comics Publicly reported January 9, 2018 Multiple nurses have accused Lee of sexually harassing them while they were caring for him, and another woman has alleged that he masturbated in front of her and groped her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 22/79 \u201cThe owner at the nursing company has openly said to people that Stan has sexually harassed every single nurse that has been to the house.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Mail ( nurses.html) Ben Vereen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ben-vereen) Actor, director Publicly reported January 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to inappropriate comments or unwanted touching, including pressing his genitals against them. Sources/more info: 1 ( just felt powerless because thought really needed his help and guidance.\u201d \u2014 Kim, actress, to the New York Daily News ( assault-hair-article-1.3738684) Paul Haggis (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/paul-haggis) Director, screenwriter Publicly reported January 5, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he raped or forcibly kissed them. He has resigned as chair of the board for Artists for Peace and Justice, a charity he founded. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) 2 ( misconduct-allegations/1021400001 felt like my life could have been over.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Associated Press ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) Albert Schultz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/albert-schultz) Actor; artistic director, Soulpepper Theatre Company Publicly reported January 3, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he committed sexual battery or sexual harassment against them. He is taking a leave of absence from the Soulpepper Theatre Company. Sources/more info: 1 ( didn\u2019t have a name for it at the time, but did fall into a depression.\u201d \u2014 Patricia Fagan, actress ( 1.4470036) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 23/79 Dan Harmon (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dan-harmon) Writer; producer; creator, Community Publicly reported January 2, 2018 former employee has reported that he sexually harassed her, and he has admitted to and apologized for the behavior. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt took me years to believe in my talents again, to trust a boss when he complimented me and not cringe when he asked for my number.\u201d \u2014 Megan Ganz, writer ( Dustin Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dustin-marshall) Founder, Feral Audio podcast network Publicly reported December 21, 2017 former partner says he abused and harassed her. He is shutting down Feral Audio. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cOne night he broke into my house and crawled into bed with me, saying that we \u2018really needed to talk\u2019\u201d \u2014 Abby Weems, musician ( T.J. Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/t-j- miller) Actor, comedian Publicly reported December 19, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her, and others have said he harassed them or made abusive or transphobic comments. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt is unfathomable to me that he doesn\u2019t understand that he actually put me through something have to live with [\u2026] that completely, completely set the tone for my sexual adult life.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( punching-a-woman) Morgan Spurlock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/morgan-spurlock) Director Publicly reported December 14, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 24/79 He said he has been accused of rape and sexual harassment. He has stepped down from his production company and other companies have cut ties or stopped distribution of his projects. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( misconduct/950744001/) 4 ( refinery29-1202228279/) 5 ( n829581) \u201cWe stand in solidarity with the victims.\u201d \u2014 spokesperson for Pretty Matches and Refinery29, announcing the suspension of a docuseries on women's issues that Spurlock was to produce ( matches-refinery29-1202228279/) Jon Heely (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jon- heely) Director of music publishing, Disney Publicly reported December 8, 2017 He is accused of sexually abusing two underage girls. He has been charged with three felony counts of child sexual abuse and suspended without pay from Disney. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cImmediately upon learning of this situation tonight, he has been suspended without pay until the matter is resolved by the courts.\u201d \u2014 Disney spokesperson, to Variety ( 1202634502/) Melanie Martinez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/melanie-martinez) Singer-songwriter Publicly reported December 5, 2017 woman has said that Martinez raped her. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.jwvZEZe9a#.niyNlNbAD) 2 ( happened never said yes said no, repeatedly. But she used her power over me, and broke me down.\u201d \u2014 Timothy Heller, singer ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F by-a-former-friend) Bryan Singer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bryan-singer) Director 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 25/79 Publicly reported December 4, 2017 man has sued Singer, saying he was raped by Singer at the age of 17. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cHe smirked and said, if say anything, he was very popular and could basically ruin my reputation.\u201d \u2014 Cesar Sanchez-Guzman ( Peter Martins (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/peter-martins) Retired ballet master in chief, New York City Ballet Publicly reported December 4, 2017 Multiple people say he sexually harassed or verbally or physically abused them, or abused his power through sexual relationships with other dancers. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( accusation.html?action=click&contentCollection=Dance&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article) 3 ( action=click&contentCollection=Dance&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article) 4 ( 5 ( \u201cHe\u2019s yanking me around to the left and to the right, he\u2019s digging his left thumb and his middle finger felt like he was piercing my muscle.\u201d \u2014 Victor Ostrovsky, former student, School of American Ballet ( ballet-new-york-city-physical-abuse.html) James Levine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-levine) Former conductor, Metropolitan Opera Publicly reported December 3, 2017 Multiple men have reported that he sexually abused them, some when they were teenagers. He has been fired from the Met, and the Ravinia Festival has cut ties with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( saw him as a safe, protective person, he took advantage of me, he abused me and it has really messed me up.\u201d \u2014 Ashok Pai ( Israel Horovitz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/israel-horovitz) Playwright Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Multiple women have said that he sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, or raped them. The Gloucester Stage theater has cut ties with him. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 26/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( share&referer= felt close to him like a grandfather, but also he was a somewhat famous guy whose time felt privileged to have. [\u2026] For the man who represented all that, to treat me the way he did, was the ultimate betrayal.\u201d \u2014 Maia Ermansons ( share&referer= Geoffrey Rush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/geoffrey-rush) Actor Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Two former co-stars have said he subjected them to unwanted sexual comments and inappropriate behavior. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( nytimes) \u201c[T]here was a small shaving mirror over the top of the partition between the showers and he was using it to look down at my naked body.\u201d \u2014 Yael Stone, actress ( smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes) Jean-Claude Arnault (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/jean-claude-arnault) Photographer; influential Swedish cultural figure; husband of Swedish Academy member Publicly reported November 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he raped or sexually harassed them. He was convicted on two counts of rape in Sweden and sentenced to two and a half years in prison. The allegations caused the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Literature to be delayed. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201c[T]here had been no flirtation or touch just found a hand up my crotch.\u201d \u2014 Gabriella H\u00e5kansson, author ( John Lasseter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-lasseter) CEO, Pixar and Walt Disney Animation Studios Publicly reported November 21, 2017 Multiple people said he had a pattern of sexually harassing women. He has taken a leave of absence from Pixar. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_source=twitter&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral) 2 ( 1059594) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 27/79 \u201cHe hugged and hugged and everyone\u2019s looking at you. Just invading the space.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Hollywood Reporter ( detailed-by-disney-pixar-insiders-1059594) Murray Miller (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/murray-miller) Writer, Girls Publicly reported November 17, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her when she was 17 years old. Police have launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cAt some point woke up in Murray\u2019s bed naked. He was on top of me having sexual intercourse with me. At no time did consent to any sexual contact with Murray.\" \u2014 Aurora Perrineau, actress ( Sylvester Stallone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sylvester-stallone) Actor Publicly reported November 16, 2017 woman has reported that he and another man sexually assaulted her when she was 16. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cI\u2019m kind of scared and I\u2019m very ashamed don\u2019t want anybody else to have that happen to them, but don\u2019t want to prosecute.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to police, according to the Daily Mail ( forcing-teen-threesome.html) Ron Jeremy (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ron- jeremy) Adult film actor Publicly reported November 15, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or sexually assaulted them, or subjected them to unwanted touching. He has been dropped from at least two industry events. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt felt like he had preplanned this in his head, like he did this to everybody.\u201d \u2014 Lynsey G., journalist ( Andy Henry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andy-henry) Casting staff Publicly reported November 15, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 28/79 Multiple women say he told them to take off their clothes as part of what he described as an acting exercise. He was fired from the show and his firm in 2008 as a result of the reports, and placed on a leave of absence from his job in 2017 when the reports became public. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt really planted a seed in my head, that maybe wasn\u2019t good enough. Of, what did do wrong?\u201d \u2014 Catherine Black, actress ( disrobing-1058398) Jesse Lacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jesse-lacey) Lead vocalist, guitarist, Brand New Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Two women have said he solicited explicit photos from them when they were minors, along with other sexually abusive behavior. The band has postponed upcoming shows. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( misconduct-postpones-tour) 3 ( \u201cThis will definitely stay with me for the rest of my life.\u201d \u2014 Nicole Elizabeth Garey ( exploitation-of-minors/) Tom Sizemore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-sizemore) Actor Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Multiple cast and crew members have said he sexually abused a young girl on a film set, and he has been convicted of physically abusing and harassing an ex-girlfriend. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( movie-set-in-2003-then-clicks-delete/) \u201cAt one point her eyes got just huge, like she could\u2019ve vomited was watching her.\u201d \u2014 Robyn Adamson, actress, describing the girl Sizemore allegedly abused ( sizemore-was-removed-movie-set-allegedly-violating-11-year-old-girl-1057629) Mark Schwahn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mark-schwahn) Showrunner, One Tree Hill and The Royals Publicly reported November 13, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed, manipulated, or made inappropriate comments to them while they worked on The Royals or One Tree Hill. He has been fired from The Royals. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 29/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( wauchope-1202207461/) \u201cMany of us were spoken to in ways that ran the spectrum from deeply upsetting, to traumatizing, to downright illegal. And a few of us were put in positions where we felt physically unsafe.\u201d \u2014 18 female cast and crew members of One Tree Hill, in an open letter ( 1202614198/) Peter Aalb\u00e6k Jensen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/peter-aalbaek-jensen) Co-founder (with Lars von Trier), Zentropa production company Publicly reported November 12, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped them or helped create a hostile working environment. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( saw women being degraded. According to the Zentropa propaganda would be part of an \u2018alternative work culture\u2019, but in reality encountered an old-fashioned, patriarchal power structure.\u201d \u2014 Anna Mette Lundtofte, writer and journalist ( of-degradation-and-sexual-harassment) Eddie Berganza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eddie-berganza) Former editor Comics Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( was physically ill from being stressed all the time and trying to hide it just felt like needed to get out, however could.\u201d \u2014 Liz Gehrlein Marsham, children's author ( utm_term=.wkWbqwBwk#.arwQAjRjW) Richard Dreyfuss (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/richard-dreyfuss) Actor Publicly reported November 10, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her over a period of years, once exposing himself to her. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=vulture&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 30/79 \u201cHe created a very hostile work environment, where felt sexualized, objectified, and unsafe.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Teich, writer ( utm_campaign=vulture&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1) Gary Goddard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/gary-goddard) CEO, the Goddard Group Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Eight men have reported that he sexually abused them when they were minors. He has taken a leave of absence from the Goddard Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cMy vulnerability was exploited was molested by Goddard, my best friend was raped by him \u2014 and this went on for years.\u201d \u2014 Anthony Edwards, actor ( Andrew Kreisberg (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrew-kreisberg) Former showrunner, Supergirl, Arrow Publicly reported November 10, 2017 More than a dozen people who worked with him have said he had a pattern of sexual harassment, including unwanted kissing and touching. He has been fired by Warner Bros Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cIt was an environment in which women \u2014 assistants, writers, executives, directors \u2014 were all evaluated based on their bodies, not on their work.\u201d \u2014 Anonymous male writer, to Variety ( 1202612522/) George Takei (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/george-takei) Actor Publicly reported November 10, 2017 man reported that Takei drugged and groped him. The accuser has since walked back most of the story. Sources/more info: 1 ( bftwnews&utm_term=.rnvvpkMzrM#.ohpvqj5O35) 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 31/79 just want him to apologize for taking advantage of our friendship.\u201d \u2014 Scott R. Brunton, former actor and model ( of-drugs-assault/) Steven Seagal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steven-seagal) Actor Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or behaved threateningly toward them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( weinstein-scandal thought about like was the last girl that day. How many girls had to take off their clothes? How many girls had to do more?\u2019\u201d \u2014 Jenny McCarthy, actress ( 1202205465/) Louis C.K. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/louis- c-k) Comedian Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them, in some cases by masturbating in front of them wide release for his upcoming film and his standup special have been canceled; several media companies have ended their relationships with him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was just actually sort of common knowledge in the comedy world. [\u2026] People made jokes about it all the time.\u201d \u2014 Rebecca Corry, comedian ( Matthew Weiner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matthew-weiner) Showrunner Publicly reported November 9, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( 1201895936/) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 32/79 had the Emmy, but instead of being able to use that as a launch pad for the rest of my career, it became an anchor because felt had to answer to speculative stories in the press eventually walked away instead of fighting back.\u201d \u2014 Kater Gordon, writer ( mad-men-1201895936/) Russell Simmons (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/russell-simmons) Music executive Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of rape, sexual assault, or battery. He has stepped down from his companies. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( 5 ( couldn\u2019t open the doors couldn\u2019t open the windows. The car was moving. The driver did not stop. He did not take me to 19th Street. He took me to your apartment.\u201d \u2014 Jenny Lumet, screenwriter ( guest-column-1062934) Robert Knepper (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-knepper) Actor Publicly reported November 8, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of sexual assault. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News_now_2017-12- 05%2007:39:00_HLewis&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews just sat there and cried for a while. My dress was torn was dirty.\u201d \u2014 Susan Bertram, costume designer ( veteran-costume-designer-1055914) Jeffrey Tambor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeffrey-tambor) Actor Publicly reported November 8, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or forcibly kissed them. He has left the show Transparent. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 33/79 \u201cGiven the journey and circumstances of my life was used to being treated as a sexual object by men \u2014 this one just happened to be famous.\u201d \u2014 Trace Lysette, actress ( Ed Westwick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ed-westwick) Actor Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple women have accused him of sexual assault or rape. Several television shows have been postponed or have paused his involvement while police investigate. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cMy other friends and people around me told me it was best not to say anything, to not be \u2018that girl\u2019 and that no one would believe me.\u201d \u2014 Aur\u00e9lie Wynn, former actress ( utm_term=.pgNaQoboN#.geWag8w8K) Adam Venit (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/adam-venit) Agent Publicly reported November 3, 2017 man has reported that Venit sexually assaulted him. Venit was suspended for a month and has been demoted. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cThis whole thing with Harvey Weinstein is giving me PTSD. Why? Because this kind of thing happened to ME.\u201d \u2014 Terry Crews, actor ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2F executive-amid-harvey-weinstein-allegations) Danny Masterson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/danny-masterson) Actor Publicly reported November 2, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped them. He has been written out of Netflix\u2019s The Ranch, and law enforcement has begun an investigation into the case. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 34/79 \u201cAccording to a report filed with the Los Angeles Police Department, the woman said Masterson raped her while she was \u2018passed out,\u2019 and when she awoke and realized he was raping her, she struggled with him until he choked her and she passed out again.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( accusations_us_59fa8410e4b01b474048242a?9o4) Nick Carter (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nick-carter) Lead singer, Backstreet Boys Publicly reported November 2, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her in 2003. Prosecutors have declined to bring criminal charges because the statute of limitations has expired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( told him to stop, but he didn\u2019t.\u201d \u2014 Melissa Schuman, former singer ( Brett Ratner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/brett-ratner) Producer, director Publicly reported November 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually assaulted or harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( don\u2019t know how different would be today \u2014 less hardened, less jaded, more trusting, all those things \u2014 if it never happened.\u201d \u2014 Natasha Henstridge, actress ( allegations-article-1.3605363) Dustin Hoffman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dustin-hoffman) Actor Publicly reported November 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cMy heart aches for the awkward virgin with the bad hair who had only been kissed three times in her life, laughing as the man her father\u2019s age talked about breasts and sex want to weep that she found this charming.\u201d \u2014 Anna Graham Hunter, writer ( guest-column-1053466) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 35/79 Andy Dick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/andy- dick) Actor and comedian Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple people said he groped and harassed men and women on film sets. He has been fired from two films. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cHe systematically went woman by woman and just said a bunch of gross things almost mechanically, robotically, and made every single one of them uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vulture ( Jeremy Piven (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeremy-piven) Actor Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually assaulted or harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( ran outside and hailed a cab and just burst into tears cried the entire way back to my hotel.\u201d \u2014 Tiffany Bacon Scourby, ad executive ( Kevin Spacey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kevin-spacey) Actor Publicly reported October 29, 2017 Multiple men have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them, or made sexual advances when they were underage. He has been fired from House of Cards and police are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.iu423zYw1Y#.nevrx9d73d) 2 ( 3 ( utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP) 4 ( 5 ( 6 ( 7 ( 8 ( \u201cWhat he left me with, more than what he took from me, was a sense that deserved this. And that\u2019s the knot I\u2019m still untangling.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vulture ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 36/79 Kirt Webster (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kirt-webster) Publicist Publicly reported October 27, 2017 man has said Webster sexually assaulted him. Webster has stepped away from his firm. Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct) 2 ( \u201cFor years was so ashamed, and since then, I\u2019ve overdosed once and I\u2019ve slit my wrists another time.\u201d \u2014 Austin Rick, former country singer ( exec-kirt-webster-of-sexual-misconduct) Ken Baker (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ken- baker) Senior correspondent News Publicly reported October 26, 2017 Two women have said he sexually harassed them. He is not appearing on air while investigates. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( almost feel like it\u2019s a power trip. It\u2019s like can do these things.\u2018\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Wrap ( about-a-sex-toy/) Ethan Kath (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ethan-kath) Co-founder, Crystal Castles Publicly reported October 24, 2017 former bandmate has reported that he raped and physically and psychologically abused her. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt has taken me years to recover from enduring almost a decade of abuse, manipulation and psychological control am still recovering.\u201d \u2014 Alice Glass, singer ( James Toback (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-toback) Director, screenwriter Publicly reported October 22, 2017 More than 200 women have reported unwanted touching or advances, including several who said he masturbated in front of them. He has been dropped by his agent. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 37/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was shocked and frozen and didn\u2019t know what to do thought if resisted, it could get worse.\u201d \u2014 Terri Conn, actress ( story.html) David Blaine (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-blaine) Magician Publicly reported October 19, 2017 woman has reported that he raped her. Police are investigating. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAfter this happened didn\u2019t want to go out, and didn\u2019t want to go to my castings wouldn\u2019t get the job because now was insecure.\u201d \u2014 Natasha Prince, art dealer ( Chris Savino (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-savino) Animator; creator, The Loud House Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them or subjected them to unwanted advances or other inappropriate behavior. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( had an opportunity to work at Nickelodeon a long time ago and didn\u2019t take the job because knew he would be inside the studio.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Cartoon Brew ( allegedly-offered-animation-work-exchange-sexual-favors-154152.html) Bob Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bob-weinstein) Producer; co-founder, the Weinstein Company Publicly reported October 17, 2017 woman has said that he sexually harassed her over a period of months. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe didn\u2019t want a friendship. He wanted more than that.\u201d \u2014 Amanda Segel, showrunner ( Tyler Grasham (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tyler-grasham) Former agent 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 38/79 Publicly reported October 17, 2017 Multiple men have said that he sexually assaulted them or made unwanted advances. He has been fired, and police have launched an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( told him no but he asked me to cuddle and kiss didn\u2019t want it to ruin my career, so did.\u201d \u2014 Brady Lindsey ( Lars von Trier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lars-von-trier) Director Publicly reported October 17, 2017 woman has accused him of a months-long pattern of sexual harassment. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( didn\u2019t comply or agree on being sexually harassed. That was then portrayed as me being difficult. If being difficult is standing up to being treated like that, I\u2019ll own it.\u201d \u2014 Bj\u00f6rk, singer-songwriter ( Roy Price (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy- price) Former head, Amazon Studios Publicly reported October 12, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has resigned from Amazon. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was shocking and surreal.\u201d \u2014 Isa Hackett, executive producer ( top-exec-roy-price-1048060?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News_now_2017- 10-12%2014:27:54_ehayden&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews) Oliver Stone (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/oliver-stone) Director Publicly reported October 12, 2017 One woman has reported that he groped her, while another said his behavior after a meeting made her uncomfortable. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.com%2Fmovies%2Fcarrie-stevens-harvey-weinstein-oliver-stone%2F) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 39/79 still remember the cocky grin on his face like he got away with something.\u201d \u2014 Carrie Stevens, model and actress ( misconduct) Ben Affleck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ben-affleck) Actor Publicly reported October 10, 2017 Two women have reported that he groped them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F harvey-weinstein-sexual-harassment had to laugh back then so wouldn\u2019t cry.\u201d \u2014 Hilarie Burton, actress ( Nelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/nelly) Rapper Publicly reported October 7, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cAfterward, Greene says she was screaming she wanted off the bus \u2026 and an entourage member pushed her off, and Nelly threw a $100 bill at her and said, \u2018Bye bye ( Harvey Weinstein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harvey-weinstein) Producer; co-founder, the Weinstein Company Publicly reported October 5, 2017 More than 80 women have reported that he sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, or raped them, in incidents dating back decades. He has been fired from the Weinstein Company. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cJust his body, his presence, his face, bring me back to the little girl that was when was twenty-one. [\u2026] When see him, it makes me feel little and stupid and weak.\u201d \u2014 Asia Argento, actress ( weinsteins-accusers-tell-their-stories) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 40/79 Hadrian Belove (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/hadrian-belove) Former executive managing director, Cinefamily Publicly reported August 23, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her, and others say he judged female employees on their looks and dated subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cWhen started volunteering was told he liked to test the new meat.\u201d \u2014 Karina Chacham, former volunteer, Cinefamily ( utm_term=.qfPWBKZkV#.enDOJrjZa) Shadie Elnashai (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/shadie-elnashai) Former vice president, Cinefamily board of directors Publicly reported August 23, 2017 Multiple people have said he inappropriately touched or pursued female subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cShadie doesn\u2019t watch the movies \u2014 he just hits on girls in the back.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to BuzzFeed News ( Roman Polanski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/roman-polanski) Director, producer, writer Publicly reported August 15, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or sexually abused them when they were under 18. He has pleaded guilty to statutory rape. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHow do know there aren\u2019t other victims? How do know that he\u2019s not still doing this?\u201d \u2014 Marianne Barnard, artist ( deserted-beach-10-years-old/) Robert \"R.\" Kelly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-r-kelly) Singer-songwriter Publicly reported July 17, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 41/79 Multiple people have accused him of controlling the sex lives and even eating habits of women who live in his properties. He was acquitted in 2008 of child pornography charges. His lawyer, publicist, and assistant have quit, and Spotify has stopped promoting his music. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.kpQrXj1YE1#.bjlVK6xdPx) 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cR. Kelly is the sweetest person you will ever want to meet. [\u2026] But Robert is the devil.\u201d \u2014 Asante McGee ( utm_term=.lyYOrOKpJ#.psgJKJazA) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 57 Les Moonves (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/les-moonves) Former Publicly reported August 6, 2018 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them. He has stepped down from CBS. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( harassment-claims) 3 ( \u201cWhat happened to me was a sexual assault, and then was fired for not participating.\u201d \u2014 Illeana Douglas, actress and writer ( of-sexual-misconduct) Kimberly Guilfoyle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kimberly-guilfoyle) Former Fox News host Publicly reported July 27, 2018 Multiple people have said she showed colleagues photographs of male genitals, discussed sexual matters at work, or was emotionally abusive. She has left Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cSix sources said Guilfoyle\u2019s behavior included showing personal photographs of male genitalia to colleagues (and identifying whose genitals they were)\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( news_us_5b5a6064e4b0b15aba96f4de) Antonin Kratochvil (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/antonin-kratochvil) Photojournalist 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 42/79 Publicly reported July 16, 2018 Multiple people have said he harassed and groped them or others. He has resigned from the photo agency he helped found. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( [\u2026] didn\u2019t say anything because didn\u2019t want to be seen as, you know, the cliched hysterical woman complaining about things.\u201d \u2014 Anastasia Taylor-Lind, photojournalist ( Christian Rodriguez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/christian-rodriguez) Photojournalist Publicly reported July 16, 2018 Multiple women say he sexually harassed them, in many cases after offering them mentorship or a job. He has been dropped by the prestigious photographers' collective Prime. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cHe jumped on the bed, he was on top of me, making pictures.\u201d \u2014 Lina Botero, photographer ( Tom Brokaw (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-brokaw) Journalist; former anchor Nightly News Publicly reported April 26, 2018 Three women have said he made unwanted advances toward them in the 1990s. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( felt powerless to say no. He could ruin my career.\u201d \u2014 Linda Vester, former correspondent ( correspondent-1202789627/) Michael Ferro (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-ferro) Former chair, Tronc Publicly reported March 19, 2018 Two women have said Ferro subjected them to unwanted kissing or touching in what they thought were business meetings. Others have said he behaved inappropriately with female employees. He has resigned from Tronc. Sources/more info: 1 ( suddenly realized that was alone in this apartment with him and that it might not be very easy to leave.\u201d \u2014 Kathryn Minshew, startup co-founder ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 43/79 Alex Jones (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/alex- jones) Founder, Infowars Publicly reported February 28, 2018 woman has reported that he groped her, sexually harassed her, and made a racist comment toward her, as well as created a hostile work environment for other women. Sources/more info: 1 ( knew that he had specifically touched my behind at that moment as a sly come-on that other people may not notice.\u201d \u2014 Ashley Beckford, former production assistant, Free Speech Systems ( Infowars-employees-claim-Alex-Jones-harassed-them.html) Ryan Seacrest (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ryan-seacrest host Publicly reported February 26, 2018 woman has reported that he sexually harassed and assaulted her, including groping her and grinding his genitals against her. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAs proud as am and as strong as a woman as am, as smart as am and as much work as I\u2019ve done with therapists, it really affected me.\u201d \u2014 Suzie Hardy, stylist ( Daniel Zwerdling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/daniel-zwerdling) Former investigative correspondent Publicly reported February 6, 2018 Multiple people have reported that he sexually harassed them or engaged in inappropriate behavior. He has retired from NPR. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( sexual-misconduct-claim) \u201cNow I\u2019m literally afraid of men in the workplace.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Current ( Patrick Witty (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/patrick-witty) Photojournalist; former National Geographic photographer Publicly reported January 29, 2018 Multiple women say he subjected them to unwanted kissing or advances. He no longer works at National Geographic. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 44/79 \u201cIt felt like he didn\u2019t take me or my work seriously.\u201d \u2014 Andrea Wise, photographer and editor ( misconduct) Dayan Candappa (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dayan-candappa) Chief content officer, Newsweek Media Group; former Americas editor, Reuters Publicly reported January 29, 2018 subordinate at Reuters reported that he repeatedly sexually harassed her. He was removed from his job at Reuters. Newsweek placed him on leave after the Reuters case became public, but reinstated him after an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThe next day in the office, he told her she was \u2018heartbreakingly beautiful,\u2019 according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Rossalyn Warren, BuzzFeed News ( utm_term=.unkPVGXGN#.beodeVlVa) Robert Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-moore) Former managing editor, New York Daily News Publicly reported January 22, 2018 Multiple former employees have said he sexually harassed co-workers. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( complaint) 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe had all the power there.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to HuffPost ( Ross Levinsohn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ross-levinsohn) Former publisher, Los Angeles Times Publicly reported January 18, 2018 He has been sued in two separate sexual harassment lawsuits. He was placed on unpaid leave at the Los Angeles Times, and then resigned. After an investigation cleared him, he was named of a new unit within the Times\u2019s parent company, Tronc. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cRoss created a definite frat boys' club [\u2026] They openly would rate women.\u201d \u2014 Jessie Dennen, former recruitment chief, Alta Vista ( behavior-trail-la-times-publisher-s-career) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 45/79 James Rosen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/james-rosen) Former chief Washington correspondent, Fox News Publicly reported January 10, 2018 Multiple women have reported that he made unwanted advances toward them. He has left Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn a shared cab ride back from a meal, Rosen groped her, grabbing her breast. After she rebuffed his advance, Rosen sought to steal away her sources and stories related to his interests in diplomacy and national security.\u201d \u2014 David Folkenflik ( harassment-claims) Kevin Braun (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/kevin-braun) Former editor-in-chief News Publicly reported January 5, 2018 He has been placed on leave to complete treatment for inappropriate behavior, including sexual harassment. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe will be on an indefinite leave of at least six months to address personal matters that have negatively affected his relationship with the company and our staff.\u201d \u2014 Michael Witt, publisher News ( Steve Butts (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-butts) Former editor-in-chief Publicly reported January 3, 2018 An employee has reported that he committed sexual harassment, and a former employee says he mishandled her report of sexual harassment by another co-worker. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow) \u201cHe told me, \u2018Don\u2019t be so uptight about it.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Kallie Plagge, editor ( utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow) H. Brandt Ayers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/h-brandt-ayers) Chair of the Consolidated Publishing Company, which publishes the Anniston Star Publicly reported January 1, 2018 Multiple women say he spanked them against their will when they worked with him at the Anniston Star in Anniston, Alabama. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 46/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( spanked/) 2 ( ac32-a7243e990784.html) 3 ( accused-of-spanking-female-employees-in-1970s/?utm_term=.edb39ca6070f was still determined to be a reporter after that. [\u2026] But hated Brandy Ayers with every cell in my body.\u201d \u2014 Veronica Pike Kennedy, former Anniston Star reporter ( assaulting-reporters-in-s/article_097db56a-ef17-11e7-ac32-a7243e990784.html) Adrian Carrasquillo (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/adrian-carrasquillo) Former White House correspondent, BuzzFeed News Publicly reported December 27, 2017 co-worker reported receiving an inappropriate message from him. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2017-12) 2 ( \u201cIn responding to a complaint filed last week by an employee, we learned that Adrian violated our Code of Conduct by sending an inappropriate message to a colleague.\u201d \u2014 BuzzFeed spokesperson, to Business Insider ( adrian-carrasquillo-following-harassment-claims-2017-12) Andrew Creighton (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrew-creighton) President, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 woman said she was fired after she turned down a sexual relationship with him. He has been placed on leave. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThere is a toxic environment where men can say the most disgusting things, joke about sex openly, and overall a toxic environment where women are treated far inferior than men.\u201d \u2014 Sandra Miller, former head of branded production, Vice Media ( sexual-harassment.html?_r=0) Mike Germano (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mike-germano) Chief digital officer, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 Two women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or touched them inappropriately. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 47/79 \u201cMany women join at an early and vulnerable point in their career. For some, sexual harassment and conscious and unconscious prejudice have overshadowed their future in journalism and severely damaged their confidence.\u201d \u2014 Vice workers, in an open letter ( Rhys James (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/rhys-james) Producer, Vice Media Publicly reported December 23, 2017 woman reported that he made racist and sexist comments to her. He has been placed on leave. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAmong Ms. Fuertes-Knight\u2019s claims were that a Vice producer, Rhys James, had made racist and sexist statements to her, including asking about the color of her nipples and whether she slept with black men.\u201d \u2014 Emily Steel, New York Times ( Jason Mojica (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jason-mojica) Former head of Vice News Publicly reported December 23, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he subjected them to unwanted touching or advances, or retaliated after a sexual relationship. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAs women, we get harassed everywhere and we don\u2019t feel compelled to report it because it\u2019s not considered a reportable offense.\" \u2014 Abby Ellis, journalist ( Don Hazen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/don- hazen) Former executive editor, AlterNet Publicly reported December 21, 2017 Multiple women say he sexually harassed them. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( utm_term=.xyMwBwRPo#.jmnP1PNaM) \u201cEvery in-person meeting had with him, which understood to be a requirement of my employment, felt like an excuse for him to sexually harass me.\u201d \u2014 Laura Gottesdiener, journalist ( utm_term=.prwXAXGVm&bftwnews#.sbX2J2Lqm) Leonard Lopate (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/leonard-lopate) Former radio host Publicly reported December 21, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 48/79 Multiple people say he made inappopriate comments or sexually harassed them. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cLeonard definitely said inappropriate things to me and my coworkers lot.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Jonathan Schwartz (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jonathan-schwartz) Former radio host Publicly reported December 21, 2017 Two women say he made inappopriate comments to them, and one of them says he also touched her in an unwelcome way. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt wasn\u2019t the least bit traumatic. It was inappropriate.\u201d \u2014 Kerry Nolan, radio host ( Tavis Smiley (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tavis-smiley) Host, Tavis Smiley Publicly reported December 13, 2017 Multiple people have said he had sexual relationships with subordinates and created an abusive and threatening environment. His show has been suspended. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cSome witnesses interviewed expressed concern that their employment status was linked to the status of a sexual relationship with Smiley.\u201d \u2014 Daniel Holloway, Variety ( Ryan Lizza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ryan- lizza) Former reporter, New Yorker Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has said he engaged in sexual misconduct. He has been fired by the New Yorker. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cOur client reported Mr. Lizza\u2019s actions to ensure that he would be held accountable and in the hope that by coming forward she would help other potential victims.\u201d \u2014 Douglas H. Wigdor, lawyer for the accuser ( _r=0) Marshall Faulk (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/marshall-faulk) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 49/79 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cFaulk would ask Cantor \u2018deeply personal and invasive questions\u2019 about her sex life; he also fondled her breasts and groped her behind, according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Ike Taylor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ike- taylor) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cTaylor sent Cantor \u2018sexually inappropriate\u2019 pictures and a video of him masturbating in the shower, according to the filing.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Heath Evans (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/heath-evans) Analyst Network; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Network. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt\u2019s outrageous conduct.\u201d \u2014 Laura Horton, lawyer for Jami Cantor, a former Network stylist who is alleging sexual harassment ( Eric Weinberger (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-weinberger) President, the Ringer; former Network executive producer Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by the Ringer. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cWeinberger sent \u2018several nude pictures of himself and sexually explicit texts\u2019 and told Cantor she was \u2018put on earth to pleasure me,\u2019 according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 50/79 Donovan McNabb (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/donovan-mcnabb) Analyst, ESPN; former player Publicly reported December 11, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her. He has been suspended by ESPN. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cDonovan McNabb, a former analyst, also texted her explicit comments, according to the complaint.\u201d \u2014 Jordyn Holman and Scott Soshnick, Bloomberg ( alleges-groping-by-top-executive-ex-players) Tom Ashbrook (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-ashbrook) Former radio host Publicly reported December 8, 2017 More than 20 current and former employees have said he verbally abused or intimidated them, or subjected them to unwanted touching. After an investigation, he has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( worry that Tom\u2019s behavior discourages young women from continuing in journalism.\" \u2014 anonymous, to ( Dylan Howard (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dylan-howard) Editor, National Enquirer, Us Weekly, and other publications Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple former employees said he sexually harassed women at work. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt\u2019s almost like had Stockholm syndrome.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the ( Lorin Stein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lorin-stein) Former editor, Paris Review Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple people have said he made unwanted advances on them, fostered a workplace culture in which looks mattered more than work, or had sex with subordinates. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 51/79 \u201cHe wanted us to be pretty, he wanted us to act that role, and if we didn\u2019t, we weren\u2019t in the light of favor.\u201d \u2014 Deirdre Foley-Mendelssohn, editor ( smid=tw-share&_r=0) John Hockenberry (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-hockenberry) Retired radio host Publicly reported December 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them or sent unwanted sexual or suggestive messages. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe\u2019d been very supportive of me, and thought he\u2019d only been like that because he wanted to sleep with me.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Cut ( Matt Lauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-lauer) Former anchor, Today show Publicly reported November 29, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them, including one who said she passed out during an assault. He has been fired from NBC. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.rsDwWBw6x#.smoOjYO5Z) 2 ( 3 ( action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=66154191&pgtype=Homepage&_r=0) \u201cHe couldn\u2019t sleep around town with celebrities or on the road with random people, because he\u2019s Matt Lauer and he\u2019s married. So he\u2019d have to do it within his stable, where he exerted power, and he knew people wouldn\u2019t ever complain.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Variety ( Garrison Keillor (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/garrison-keillor) Founding host Prairie Home Companion Publicly reported November 29, 2017 woman reported that he subjected her to unwanted sexual touching. He has been dropped by Minnesota Public Radio and the Washington Post syndicate. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( compa) 3 ( stand-out/?utm_term=.861a89aa22f1) 4 ( simply-touching-a-womans-bare-back/?utm_term=.a40b5a33fa3a) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 52/79 \u201cMinnesota Public Radio (MPR) is terminating its contracts with Garrison Keillor and his private media companies after recently learning of allegations of his inappropriate behavior with an individual who worked with him.\u201d \u2014 Minnesota Public Radio statement ( garrison-keillor-and-a-prairie-home-compa) Charlie Rose (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charlie-rose) Former anchor This Morning; former host, Charlie Rose Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple women have said that he sexually harassed them. He has been fired by CBS, PBS, and Bloomberg. Sources/more info: 1 ( and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.879296022b7a) 2 ( accusations-n822691) \u201cEverybody is terrified of him. [\u2026] He creates this environment of constant fear. And then he\u2019ll shine a spotlight on you and make you feel amazing.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( harassed-them--with-nudity-groping-and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html? utm_term=.aa939cb97a9d) Glenn Thrush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/glenn-thrush) Reporter, New York Times Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple women have said that he made unwanted advances toward them. He was suspended by the New York Times and removed from the White House beat. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hate feeling obligated to make him think think everything is fine. [\u2026] It\u2019s been this thing hanging over me feel like have to be nice to this person just because he knows people.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Vox ( Matt Zimmerman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-zimmerman) Former executive News Publicly reported November 16, 2017 Multiple people have said he pursued relationships with young women who worked with him, and sent inappropriate text messages. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 53/79 \u201cWe have recently learned that Matt Zimmerman engaged in inappropriate conduct with more than one woman at NBCU, which violated company policy. As a result, he has been dismissed News spokesperson ( claims-1058026) Kaj Larsen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/kaj- larsen) Former bureau chief, Vice Publicly reported November 15, 2017 woman has reported that he subjected her to unwanted touching and inappropriate sexual comments. He is no longer at the company. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt felt like a threat. [\u2026] The way he looked at me, the way he grabbed my arm remember feeling scared.\u201d \u2014 Phoebe Barghouty, former Vice associate producer ( vice-of-toxic-sexual-harassment-culture) Vince Ingenito (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/vince-ingenito) Former editor Publicly reported November 13, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed her and a female co-worker. In March, he said he had been laid off. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt got to the point where couldn\u2019t work for multiple hours a day because was having panic attacks, so decided to quit.\u201d \u2014 Kallie Plagge, editor ( Jann Wenner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jann-wenner) Publisher, Rolling Stone Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple people have said he sexually harassed or assaulted them or subjected them to unwanted advances or touching. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hadn\u2019t known exactly how violating sexual harassment really was until felt the pull inside myself as he dangled that contract in front of my face (at the time was quite desperate for work), while on the other hand was filled with revulsion over his proposition.\u201d \u2014 Ben Ryan, writer ( Michael Hafford (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-hafford) Freelance writer; former \"Male Feminist\" columnist at Broadly, a Vice Media site 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 54/79 Publicly reported November 3, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he raped or abused them. He has been banned from contributing to Vice websites. Sources/more info: 1 ( think was in very deep denial that somebody who everybody knows and likes his writing would be capable of hurting me that much.\u201d \u2014 Helen Donahue, former Vice writer and social media editor ( allegatio-1819266286) David Corn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-corn bureau chief, Mother Jones Publicly reported November 2, 2017 Multiple people have said he engaged in inappropriate workplace behavior, including unwanted touching and rape jokes. Mother Jones investigated previous reports, and did so again when new information surfaced, finding no misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn the summer and fall of 2014, some women staffers reported that they had quit pitching stories involving rape because David\u2019s reactions made them so uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 a former Mother Jones staffer ( 244482) Michael Oreskes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/michael-oreskes) Former senior vice president of news and editorial director, NPR; former editor, New York Times Publicly reported October 31, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them. He has resigned from NPR. Sources/more info: 1 ( women/2017/10/31/a2078bea-bdf7-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.b4dda71446b3) 2 ( \u201cThe worst part of my whole encounter with Oreskes wasn\u2019t the weird offers of room service lunch or the tongue kiss but the fact that he utterly destroyed my ambition.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Washington Post ( harassment-by-two-women/2017/10/31/a2078bea-bdf7-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.b4dda71446b3) Hamilton Fish (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/hamilton-fish) Former publisher, the New Republic; former president, the Nation Institute Publicly reported October 29, 2017 Multiple people said he subjected female employees to inappropriate remarks, touching, and unfair treatment. He has resigned from the New Republic. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 55/79 \u201cIt all took place against a backdrop where there was no personnel handbook and no one in an role.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to HuffPost ( women_us_59f79183e4b0c0c8e67c258e) Mark Halperin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/mark-halperin) Political journalist and author Publicly reported October 25, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them, in some cases by pressing his genitals against them. He has been dismissed by News and MSNBC, and a book and project have been canceled. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cFor the last 11 years have had to watch this guy find success in every other news organization.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Leon Wieseltier (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/leon-wieseltier) Former literary editor, the New Republic; founding editor, Idea Journal of Politics and Culture Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. The magazine he was to head has been shuttered. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( didn\u2019t feel like there was ever any recourse for his behavior, because he was treated as a powerful, even untouchable, person, certainly more important and indispensable than me.\u201d \u2014 Katherine Marsh, writer ( Knight Landesman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/knight-landesman) Former publisher, Artforum Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple women and men have accused him of sexual harassment or unwanted touching. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhenever I\u2019d see him my body would contract in fear so started avoiding him.\u201d \u2014 anonymous ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 56/79 Lockhart Steele (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/lockhart-steele) Former editorial director, Vox Media Publicly reported October 20, 2017 former employee has reported unwanted kissing and touching by him. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201c[S]uddenly, in the dark corner of the car, he was kissing my neck.\u201d \u2014 Eden Rohatensky, developer ( fucking-creeps-119f0cbd3f07) Harry Knowles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harry-knowles) Founder, Ain't It Cool News Publicly reported September 23, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed or assaulted them. He has stepped down from Ain\u2019t It Cool News. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cHarry sexually harassed me. He has sexually harassed other women in this community for years. This wasn\u2019t an anomaly. He is a predator.\u201d \u2014 Britt Hayes, film writer ( ) Charles Payne (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charles-payne) Host, Fox Business; contributor, Fox News Publicly reported September 18, 2017 woman says that he raped her, and that Fox retaliated against her when she reported the experience. Payne was suspended but has returned to work following an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( _r=0&referer= 2 ( \u201cIn July of 2013 was raped by Charles Payne. [\u2026] In July of 2017 was raped again by Fox News.\u201d \u2014 Scottie Nell Hughes, political commentator ( payne.html?_r=0&referer= Eric Bolling (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/eric- bolling) Former host, Fox News Publicly reported August 4, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 57/79 Multiple people say he sent unsolicited photos of male genitals to at least 3 colleagues. He has left Fox News, and his show has been canceled. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cThe women did not solicit the messages, which they told colleagues were deeply upsetting and offensive.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( messages_us_5984d2bbe4b0cb15b1be6d65?hd6) Sean Hannity (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/sean-hannity) Host, Fox News Publicly reported April 21, 2017 former Fox News guest has said he asked her to come back to his hotel, and did not invite her back on his show after she refused. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cAfter said wouldn\u2019t go to his hotel was blacklisted from Fox News.\u201d \u2014 Debbie Schlussel, lawyer and blogger ( harassment-claim-n750211) Bill O'Reilly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/bill- o-reilly) Former host, Fox News Publicly reported April 1, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually harassed them. He has been fired from Fox News. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was like street harassment in the office.\u201d \u2014 Perquita Burgess, former Fox temp worker ( sexual-harassment-995841) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 18 Andy Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andy-rubin) Former Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 Google employee accused him of coercing her into oral sex, and a company investigation found her claim credible, according to two Google executives. He resigned from Google in 2014 with a $90 million exit package. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 58/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cShe agreed to meet him at a hotel, where she said he pressured her into oral sex.\u201d \u2014 New York Times ( Richard DeVaul (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/richard-devaul) Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 woman whom DeVaul had interviewed for a job says he invited her to what she thought was a professional meeting, then asked her to take off her shirt and offered her a back rub. He has apologized for an \u201cerror of judgment,\u201d and Google has taken unspecified \u201ccorrective action.\u201d Sources/more info: 1 ( didn\u2019t have enough spine or backbone to shut that down as a 24-year-old.\u201d \u2014 Star Simpson, engineer ( Amit Singhal (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/amit-singhal) Former Google executive Publicly reported October 25, 2018 An employee said that he groped her, according to three people briefed on the incident. He resigned and received an exit package worth millions of dollars, they said. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIn 2015, an employee said Mr. Singhal groped her at a boozy off-site event attended by dozens of colleagues, said three people who were briefed on the incident.\u201d \u2014 New York Times ( Demos Parneros (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/demos-parneros) Former CEO, Barnes & Noble Publicly reported August 28, 2018 former employee said he sexually harassed her. He was fired for this and other violations of company policies, according to Barnes & Noble. Sources/more info: 1 ( [Parneros was] \u201cterminated for sexual harassment, bullying behavior and other violations of company policies.\u201d \u2014 Barnes & Noble board of directors ( lawsuit.html) Terdema Ussery (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/terdema-ussery) Former president and CEO, Dallas Mavericks; former president of global sports, Under Armour Publicly reported February 20, 2018 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 59/79 Multiple women say he subjected them to unwanted advances or touching, or other inappropriate behavior, while they worked for the Mavericks or Under Armour. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt trapped, frozen, scared.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Sports Illustrated ( cuban-response) Steve Wynn (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-wynn) Founder, Wynn Resorts; former finance chair, Republican National Committee Publicly reported January 27, 2018 Dozens of people have said that he pressured female employees to perform sex acts, exposed himself, or engaged in unwanted touching. He has resigned from the and from Wynn Resorts. Sources/more info: 1 ( 1516985953) 2 ( 3 ( was not brave enough to say, \u2018How dare you?\u2019\u201d \u2014 Shawn Cardinal, former personal assistant to Wynn's ex-wife ( of-sexual-misconduct-by-las-vegas-mogul-steve-wynn-1516985953) Max Ogden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/max-ogden) Computer programmer; executive director, Code for Science & Society Publicly reported December 15, 2017 former partner reported that Ogden was sexually abusive, controlling, and coercive. Ogden has stepped down from leadership roles with Code for Science & Society and the Dat Project. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( think \u2014 all the time \u2014 about my silence. How it protected him while he abused me & protects him now.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Lord, web developer ( Harold Ford Jr. (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/harold-ford-jr) Former managing director and senior client relationship manager, Morgan Stanley; former representative (D-TN) Publicly reported December 7, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually harassed and intimidated her. He has been fired from Morgan Stanley, but the bank now says he was not fired for sexual misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 60/79 \u201cThe woman alleged that Ford engaged in harassment, intimidation, and forcibly grabbed her one evening in Manhattan, leading her to seek aid from a building security guard.\u201d \u2014 Yashar Ali, HuffPost ( psa) Sam Isaly (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/sam- isaly) Co-founder, managing partner, OrbiMed Publicly reported December 5, 2017 Multiple people have reported that he sexually harassed female employees. He announced plans to retire. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( harassment-allegations/933808001/) 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt was like a fact of life that everyone had to accept. Sam just did what he could get away with.\u201d \u2014 Yanping Ren, former OrbiMed intern ( Shervin Pishevar (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/shervin-pishevar) Venture capitalist; co-founder, Sherpa Capital Publicly reported November 30, 2017 Multiple woman say he sexually assaulted or harassed them. He has resigned from Sherpa Capital. Sources/more info: 1 ( multiple-women) 2 ( wanted to get career advice, and it was twisted into something else.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Bloomberg ( sexual-misconduct-by-multiple-women) Howie Rubin (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/howie-rubin) Former portfolio manager, Soros Fund Management Publicly reported November 3, 2017 Three women have reported that he raped and beat them. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhile arrogance and self-import may convince certain men otherwise, neither money nor power gives any person the right to victimize a woman.\u201d \u2014 Jeremy Saland, a lawyer for one of the women ( women-in-penthouse-dungeon/) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 61/79 Caleb Jennings (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/caleb-jennings) Former lead Chicago organizer, Fight for 15 (SEIU) Publicly reported October 24, 2017 Multiple staffers reported that he had a sexist attitude and physically assaulted a female staffer, who was later fired criminal court found him not guilty of assault. He has been fired. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cThe sexist and aggressive attitude of Caleb Jennings has created a toxic environment and fear inside the office of the FF15.\u201d \u2014 four Chicago organizers, in an email to SEIU's president ( utm_term=.loVMKgYgn#.fke9KO0OA) Robert Scoble (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/robert-scoble) Blogger; co-founder, the Transformation Group Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually assaulted or harassed them. He has resigned from the Transformation Group. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( allegations/789071001/) \u201cIt made me sick to work with him, but also he was offering so much help. [\u2026] As women we sometimes have to make tough choices. Do want to call him out, or do want to advance my career?\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to TechCrunch ( women-after-going-sober/) Scott Courtney (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/scott-courtney) Former executive vice president, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Publicly reported October 19, 2017 Multiple people have said he had a history of relationships with young female staffers, who were later promoted. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cQuestions were raised about Executive Vice President Scott Courtney relating to a romantic relationship between a staff person and a supervisor.\u201d \u2014 Mary Kay Henry international president ( utm_term=.kamE9wKw5#.wbXe01w1v) Chris Sacca (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/chris-sacca) Retired venture capital investor 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 62/79 Publicly reported June 30, 2017 woman reported that he touched her face without her consent. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cThere is such a massive imbalance of power that women in the industry often end up in distressing situations.\u201d \u2014 Susan Wu, entrepreneur and investor ( sexual-harassment.html?_r=0) Dave McClure (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dave-mcclure) Investor; co-founder, 500 Startups Publicly reported June 30, 2017 woman has reported that he sexually assaulted her, and another says he made an unwanted advance. He has said he made inappropriate advances to multiple women and has resigned from 500 Startups. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( \u201cIt\u2019s the worst position to be in when you feel helpless about something you know was outright wrong.\u201d \u2014 Cheryl Yeoh, entrepreneur ( Justin Caldbeck (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/justin-caldbeck) Co-founder, former managing partner, Binary Capital Publicly reported June 24, 2017 Multiple women have said he made unwanted advances toward them. He has resigned from Binary Capital. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhile we\u2019re happy that he apologized and we\u2019re happy especially for the support of the amazing women and men, our strong preference would have been to not be in this position to begin with.\u201d \u2014 Leiti Hsu, co-founder of the startup Journy ( making-unwanted-advances/) Travis Kalanick (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/travis-kalanick) Founder, Uber Publicly reported June 17, 2017 female employee has said he visited a bar with escort services, along with her and other employees, making her uncomfortable. Multiple employees also reported discrimination, sexual harassment, and a toxic environment at the company. Kalanick has resigned. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 63/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cEvery time something ridiculous happened, every time a sexist email was sent, I\u2019d sent a short report to just to keep a record going.\u201d \u2014 Susan J. Fowler, former Uber engineer ( uber ) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 46 Eric Bauman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-bauman) Former chair, California Democratic Party Publicly reported November 28, 2018 Multiple people say he made sexually explicit comments in the workplace and other professional settings, and engaged in unwanted touching. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( felt really embarrassed, almost ashamed, and uncomfortable.\u201d \u2014 Grace Leekley, temporary party staffer ( 20181128-story.html) Albert J. Alvarez (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/albert-j-alvarez) Former chief of staff, New Jersey Schools Development Authority Publicly reported October 10, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her when they both worked on New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy\u2019s campaign. He has resigned from his position with the New Jersey schools. Sources/more info: 1 ( criminal-allegation-642671?mod=article_inline) 2 ( straight up said: \u2018This is not consensual.\u2019\u201d \u2014 Katie Brennan, chief of staff, New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency ( assault-accusation-in-new-jersey-exposes-a-national-dilemma-1539542172) Charles Schwertner (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/charles-schwertner) Texas state senator (R-Georgetown) Publicly reported September 25, 2018 graduate student at Austin said he sent her an explicit text message Austin investigation found it was \u201cplausible\u201d that a third party had sent the message, though Schwertner did not fully cooperate with the investigation. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 64/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct-claim/asnidSImg1fcb2FNBZ8iCO/) 2 ( \u201cPlease stop the inappropriate texts, it is unprofessional.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, graduate student, in a message to Schwertner ( related-investigation-charles-schwertner/) Brett Kavanaugh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/brett-kavanaugh) Supreme Court justice Publicly reported September 14, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her, another has said he thrust his genitals in her face without her consent, and others have said they witnessed abusive or inappropriate behavior by him. After a hearing and investigation into some of the allegations, he was confirmed to the Supreme Court. Sources/more info: 1 ( kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress) 2 ( about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html) 3 ( supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez) 4 ( 5 ( thought that Brett was accidentally going to kill me.\u201d \u2014 Christine Blasey Ford, psychology professor ( statement-for-senate-hearing) David Keyes (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/david-keyes) Former spokesperson for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel Publicly reported September 11, 2018 woman has said he sexually assaulted her, and three others have said he tried to bully them into sex. He has resigned as Netanyahu\u2019s spokesperson. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cIt was completely nonconsensual.\u201d \u2014 Julia Salazar, New York state Senate candidate ( israel.html) Tom Frieden (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tom-frieden) Former director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Publicly reported August 24, 2018 woman reported that he groped her. He has been charged with sexual abuse, forcible touching, and harassment. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 65/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( idUSKCN1L91PV) 2 ( saw his face again and realized all this man had been doing was protecting himself.\u201d \u2014 the woman who has reported that Frieden groped her ( busted-groping-20180824-story.html) Nick Sauer (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nick-sauer) Former state representative, Illinois (R-51st district) Publicly reported August 1, 2018 An ex-girlfriend has said he posted nude photos of her on a fake Instagram account without her consent. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cNick would use [a fake Instagram account] to direct message men with my photos to engage in graphic conversations of a sexual nature.\u201d \u2014 Kate Kelly, ex-girlfriend of Nick Sauer ( Corey Coleman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/corey-coleman) Former personnel chief, Federal Emergency Management Agency Publicly reported July 30, 2018 He is under investigation in connection with allegations that he sexually harassed an employee and created an environment in which women were hired as possible sex partners for male employees. He has resigned from FEMA. Sources/more info: 1 ( employees-agency-chief-says/2018/07/30/964da518-9403-11e8-80e1-00e80e1fdf43_story.html?utm_term=.8feb29dc11f9) 2 ( complaints/2018/08/02/52d9785e-964f-11e8-810c-5fa705927d54_story.html?utm_term=.b182fd5f90b3) \u201cWhat we uncovered was a systemic problem going back years.\u201d \u2014 William \"Brock\" Long administrator ( some-as-possible-sexual-partners-for-male-employees-agency-chief-says/2018/07/30/964da518-9403-11e8-80e1- 00e80e1fdf43_story.html?utm_term=.8feb29dc11f9) Mel Watt (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/mel- watt) Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency (Democrat) Publicly reported July 27, 2018 An employee has said he sexually harassed her. He is under investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( metoo-story/?utm_term=.6010e94fbbba) 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 66/79 felt vulnerable and unsafe.\u201d \u2014 Simone Grimes, supervisory program management analyst ( watches-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-house-will-hear-another-metoo-story/?utm_term=.6010e94fbbba) Curtis Hill (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/curtis-hill) Attorney general, Indiana (Republican) Publicly reported July 2, 2018 lawmaker, two staffers, and another woman have said he touched them inappropriately. He is under criminal investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( hill/868706002/) 3 ( appointed/826870002/) \u201c[H]e grabbed my hand and moved both of our hands over my butt, lingering there before releasing me.\u201d \u2014 Niki DaSilva, Indiana state Senate aide ( memo-detailing-allegations-against-hill/868706002/) Eric Schneiderman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-schneiderman) Former attorney general, New York (D) Publicly reported May 7, 2018 Multiple women have said he physically abused them, in some cases during sex. He has resigned. After an investigation, prosecutors announced he would not face criminal charges. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cTaking a strong woman and tearing her to pieces is his jam.\u201d \u2014 Michelle Manning Barish, writer and activist ( attorney-general-of-physical-abuse) Clay Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/clay-johnson) Political technoogy expert; former lead programmer, Howard Dean campaign Publicly reported May 4, 2018 Two women have said he sexually assaulted them, and others have said he made inappropriate sexual comments. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 67/79 \u201c[B]efore could say anything, the next thing remember is was pinned on his bed.\u201d \u2014 Sarah Schacht, former Howard Dean campaign staffer ( dean-campaign_us_5aebb6d7e4b0c4f1932090ac?pdb) Tony C\u00e1rdenas (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tony-cardenas representative (D-CA) Publicly reported April 27, 2018 woman has sued, alleging that an unnamed elected official sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager. C\u00e1rdenas has confirmed he is the subject of the suit, though he denies the allegations. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( abuse/2018/05/03/0f2ef7d8-4f04-11e8-af46-b1d6dc0d9bfe_story.html?utm_term=.2d65cb07fae2) \u201cThe suit alleges sexual battery, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.\u201d \u2014 Dakota Smith, Los Angeles Times ( Benton Strong (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/benton-strong) Former associate director for communications, Center for American Progress Action Fund; former employee, Seattle Office of Sustainability and Energy Publicly reported April 23, 2018 Two women have reported that he made inappropriate comments or sent unwanted, sexually explicit text messages. Another woman reported that he harassed and assaulted her after a breakup in college. He has resigned from his job with the city of Seattle. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.ovxDYDMne#.vp8QvQOwn surely expected better out of an organization that housed a national campaign on sexual assault.\u201d \u2014 Mary, in a memo to ( utm_term=.ovxDYDMne#.vp8QvQOwn) Benjamin Sparks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/benjamin-sparks) Political adviser Publicly reported April 4, 2018 Sparks\u2019s ex-fianc\u00e9e has said that he sexually enslaved and battered her. He has been fired from the consulting firm where he was the political affairs director and has been charged with misdemeanor domestic battery. Sources/more info: 1 ( her-his-sex-slave/) 2 ( woman-his-sex-slave/) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 68/79 \u201cOver the last month it escalated into very rough sex where he\u2019d actually hurt me.\" \u2014 anonymous, to the Las Vegas Review-Journal ( says-las-vegas-gop-campaign-adviser-made-her-his-sex-slave/) Nicholas Kettle (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/nicholas-kettle) Former Rhode Island state senator (R-Coventry) Publicly reported February 19, 2018 He has been charged with video voyeurism for allegedly sending nude photos of a woman without her knowledge, and with extorting sex from a teenage state House page. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( house-page) 3 ( \u201cMr. Kettle stated that he needed to be \u2018stealthy\u2019 and was asking [the friend] for advice on how to take a video without [his girlfriend] knowing.\u201d \u2014 Robert Hopkins, Rhode Island state police detective ( girlfriend-to-married-friend/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_StephMachado) Ed Crane (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed- crane) Co-founder, Cato Institute Publicly reported February 8, 2018 Multiple woman say he sexually harassed them, and others say he made inappropriate comments about women\u2019s bodies and clothing in the workplace. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_content=buffer16e91&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer) \u201cThe minute she left he turned to all the men in the room and went, \u2018Man, I\u2019d love to have her sit on my face.\u2018\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Politico ( utm_content=buffer16e91&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer) Cristina Garcia (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/cristina-garcia) California state Assembly member (D) Publicly reported February 8, 2018 Multiple men have reported that she groped them or made unwanted advances. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( spin-the-bottle-complaint-says/?utm_term=.b3da754dce8d) \u201cShe looked at me for a second and said, \u2018I\u2019ve set a goal for myself to fuck you.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to Politico ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 69/79 Burns Strider (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/burns-strider) Former adviser, Hillary Clinton presidential campaign (2008); former leader, Correct the Record Publicly reported January 26, 2018 woman reported that he sexually harassed her while they worked on the Clinton campaign, and multiple former colleagues say he was fired from Correct the Record after sexual harassment allegations there. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2008.html?smid=tw-share) \u201cShe told a campaign official that Mr. Strider had rubbed her shoulders inappropriately, kissed her on the forehead and sent her a string of suggestive emails\u201d \u2014 Maggie Haberman and Amy Chozick, New York Times ( to-shield-a-top-adviser-accused-of-harassment-in-2008.html?smid=tw-share) Patrick Meehan (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/patrick-meehan representative (R-PA) Publicly reported January 20, 2018 former aide reported that he made unwanted advances toward her. He has been removed from the House Ethics Committee and will not seek reelection. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cMr. Meehan professed his romantic desires for her \u2014 first in person, and then in a handwritten letter \u2014 and he grew hostile when she did not reciprocate, the people familiar with her time in the office said.\u201d \u2014 Katie Rogers and Kenneth P. Vogel, New York Times ( harassment.html) Jeffrey Klein (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/jeffrey-klein) New York state senator (D-Bronx) Publicly reported January 10, 2018 woman says he forcibly kissed her. The New York state Democratic Party has called for an investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cAll of a sudden there was a hand on the back of my head and he shoved his tongue down my throat.\u201d \u2014 Erica Vladimer, former New York state Senate staffer ( misconduct_us_5a5531cbe4b03417e872f80e?4ps) Eric Greitens (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/eric-greitens) Governor, Missouri (R) Publicly reported January 10, 2018 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 70/79 According to an investigative report, he coerced a woman into oral sex, claimed to have taken a compromising photo of her, and threatened to release it if she told anyone. He has been charged with invasion of privacy. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHe stepped back saw a flash through the blindfold and he said: \u2018you\u2019re never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, on a tape obtained by ( affair#.WlbpAn6BIAA.twitter) Corey Lewandowski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/corey-lewandowski) Political commentator; former campaign manager for Donald Trump Publicly reported December 22, 2017 woman has filed a sexual assault complaint against him, saying he slapped her twice on the buttocks. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt was completely demeaning and shocking.\u201d \u2014 Joy Villa, singer ( Andrea Ramsey (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/andrea-ramsey) Former candidate for the House of Representatives (D-KS) Publicly reported December 15, 2017 man has reported that she sexually harassed him and retaliated when he rejected her advances. She has dropped out of her congressional race. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cAfter rejected her, she told me she now was hearing bad things about my performance and on June 13, 2005, terminated my employment.\u201d \u2014 Gary Funkhouser, former employee, LabOne ( Bobby Scott (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/bobby-scott representative (D-VA) Publicly reported December 15, 2017 woman reports that he sexually harassed her. Sources/more info: 1 ( denied-lawmaker/955214001/) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 71/79 was propositioned to have a sexual relationship with my boss that did not want was retaliated against was wrongfully terminated and was blackballed.\u201d \u2014 M. Reese Everson, author and attorney ( alleges-sexual-harassment-strongly-denied-lawmaker/955214001/) Ed Murray (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/ed- murray) Secretary of state, Wyoming (R) Publicly reported December 14, 2017 woman says that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( assaulted/article_2f1faf41-90a7-52b4-b6c6-bbf374843977.html#utm_source=trib.com&utm_campaign=%2Femail- updates%2Fbreaking%2F&utm_medium=email&utm_content was disgusted and horrified.\u201d \u2014 Tatiana Maxwell, real estate developer ( secretary-of-state-ed-murray-sexually-assaulted/article_2f1faf41-90a7-52b4-b6c6- bbf374843977.html#utm_source=trib.com&utm_campaign=%2Femail- updates%2Fbreaking%2F&utm_medium=email&utm_content=) Dan Johnson (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/dan-johnson) Former state representative (R-KY) Publicly reported December 12, 2017 woman reported that he sexually assaulted her when she was 17. He killed himself shortly after the allegations were published. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( resign/) 3 ( his-widow-calls-it-a-high-tech-lynching/?utm_term=.de8f0844cfb5) \u201cWhat you did was beyond mean, it was evil.\u201d \u2014 Maranda Richmond, in a message to Johnson ( Alex Kozinski (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/alex-kozinski) Retired judge Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Publicly reported December 9, 2017 Multiple former employees have said he showed them pornography, touched them inappropriately, or made inappropriate sexual comments to them. He has retired. Sources/more info: 1 ( misconduct/2017/12/08/1763e2b8-d913-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.48dd2ff565cf) 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 72/79 3 ( allegations) \u201cIt wasn\u2019t just clear that he was imagining me naked, he was trying to invite other people \u2014 my professional colleagues \u2014 to do so as well.\u201d \u2014 Emily Murphy, former clerk ( kozinski-accused-of-sexual-misconduct/2017/12/08/1763e2b8-d913-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.c956f1b10870) Trent Franks (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/trent-franks) Former representative (R-AZ) Publicly reported December 7, 2017 House sources said that he approached two female staffers about acting as a gestational surrogate for his wife and him. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was asked a few times to look over a \u2018contract\u2019 to carry his child, and if would conceive his child would be given $5 million.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( Borris Miles (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/borris-miles) State representative (D-TX) Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Multiple people have said that he subjected women to unwanted advances, sexual comments, or forcible kissing. Sources/more info: 1 ( just remember thinking need to go, and need to not be here anymore.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( capitol) Carlos Uresti (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/carlos-uresti) State representative (D-TX) Publicly reported December 6, 2017 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( \u201cHe put his hands on me, he ogled me would not get in an elevator with him.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Daily Beast ( capitol) Matt Dababneh (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/matt-dababneh) Former California state Assembly member (D) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 73/79 Publicly reported December 4, 2017 woman has reported that he exposed himself to her and masturbated in front of her, and another has said he harassed her. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( bathroom/) 2 ( \u201cDuring the time he blocked me in that room, my instincts were focused on escaping without physical contact and in a way that would not cause a scene.\u201d \u2014 Pamela Lopez, lobbyist ( harassed-her-in-a-bathroom/) Rub\u00e9n Kihuen (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/ruben-kihuen representative (D-NV); former Nevada state senator Publicly reported December 1, 2017 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed them. Sources/more info: 1 ( utm_term=.iiPJY3D5AD#.uuJqGL8648) 2 ( \u201cYou don\u2019t really know what to say when a senator tells you, like, \u2018Nice ass.\u2019\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to the Nevada Independent ( persistent-unwanted-sexual-advances) Blake Farenthold (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/blake-farenthold representative (R-TX) Publicly reported November 30, 2017 former staffer sued him, alleging gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and creating a hostile work environment. He used taxpayer money to settle the claim. He will not seek reelection. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cIt\u2019s definitely turned my life upside down.\u201d \u2014 Lauren Greene, former communications director for Farenthold ( sexual-harass-greene-278869) John Conyers (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/john-conyers) Former representative (D-MI) Publicly reported November 20, 2017 Multiple former employees have said he sexually harassed female staffers. He has resigned. 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 74/79 Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( 4 ( says/2017/12/05/17057ea0-d9bb-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?utm_term=.37d0bbc4ae44 was basically blackballed. There was nowhere could go.\" \u2014 anonymous, to BuzzFeed ( utm_term=.jaYwr3D3b#.uxxxQ5g5V) Wesley Goodman (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/wesley-goodman) Former state representative (R-OH) Publicly reported November 17, 2017 man reported that Goodman groped him, and multiple men said he sent them unwanted or inappropriate sexual or suggestive messages. He quit after it was revealed that he had a consensual sexual encounter with a man in his office. Sources/more info: 1 ( gop-star/2017/11/17/b3b4b8da-c956-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html) 2 ( goodman/) 3 ( male.html) \u201cHe also asked how much \u2018p******y was getting and wondering what was doing on Friday and Saturday nights.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, to ( gop-rep-wes-goodman/) Al Franken (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/al- franken senator (D-MN) Publicly reported November 16, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped or otherwise harassed them. He has announced that he will resign from Congress. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( was stunned and incredulous felt demeaned felt put in my place.\u201d \u2014 anonymous former elected official in New England, to Jezebel ( franken-tried-to-g-1820849687) Jeff Kruse (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/jeff- kruse) Oregon state senator (R-Roseburg) Publicly reported November 15, 2017 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 75/79 Two women have reported that he sexually harassed or inappropriately touched them. He has been relieved of committee assignments and is under investigation. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cWhat made all of this worse is that not only was continuing to experience this behavior, [\u2026] but was witnessing this happen to other women.\u201d \u2014 Sara Gelser, Oregon state senator (D-Corvallis) ( Calvin Smyre (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/calvin-smyre) Georgia state representative (D-Columbus) Publicly reported November 10, 2017 woman reported that he sexually assaulted her. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cHow many stories of assault and harassment have never been told because of political connections?\u201d \u2014 Jehmu Greene, political commentator ( Steve Lebsock (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/steve-lebsock) Former state representative, Colorado (D-Thornton) Publicly reported November 10, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he sexually harassed them. The Colorado House of Representatives has voted to expel him. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( \u201cOn Monday, for the first time in nearly two years, I\u2019m going to come to a building where I\u2019m not going to be worried about retaliation from someone stood up to.\u201d \u2014 Faith Winter, Colorado state representative ( Roy Moore (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/roy- moore) Former judge; 2017 Senate candidate Publicly reported November 9, 2017 Multiple women have said he sexually abused or assaulted them, or pursued them sexually or romantically when they were teenagers. Sources/more info: 1 ( 32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.512aedc10bfb) 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 76/79 felt like had done something bad. And it kind of set the course for me doing other things that were bad.\u201d \u2014 Leigh Corfman, customer service representative ( initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html? tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.d9990836f257) Dwayne Duron Marshall (/a/sexual-harassment-assault- allegations-list/dwayne-duron-marshall) Former chief of staff to Rep. Brenda Lawrence (D-MI) Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple women have said he made inappropriate comments or engaged in unwanted touching in the workplace. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cShe\u2019s complicit because she knows. [\u2026] She knows he makes comments. She knows he rubs the back and rubs the shoulders.\u201d \u2014 anonymous, about Rep. Lawrence, to Politico ( aide-244617) Tony Mendoza (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/tony-mendoza) California state senator (D-Artesia) Publicly reported November 7, 2017 Multiple people have said that he behaved inappropriately with a female legislative fellow and other staffers. He is under investigation and has been stripped of his leadership positions. Sources/more info: 1 ( 1513299672-htmlstory.html) 2 ( 3 ( 1517619265-htmlstory.html) \u201cShe said she feared for her job if she refused the invitations.\u201d \u2014 Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times ( mendoza-under-investigation-for-1517619265-htmlstory.html) Raul Bocanegra (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/raul-bocanegra) Former California state Assembly member (D) Publicly reported October 27, 2017 Multiple women have reported that he groped them or made unwanted advances. He has resigned. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( election/) 3 ( misconduct/) 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 77/79 \u201cHe grabbed me with one hand, grabbed my head and shoved his tongue into my mouth.\u201d \u2014 Sylvia Castillo, former student mentorship program coordinator ( lawmaker-accused-of-groping-fellow-staffer-will-not-run-for-re-election/) George H.W. Bush (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/george-h-w-bush) Former president Publicly reported October 25, 2017 Multiple women have said he groped them during photo ops. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( \u201cAt the very moment when was feeling honored to be recognized for my work and to raise money for this important organization that believe in, President Bush made clear to me that because am a woman can be objectified, sexualized, reduced to a body part.\u201d \u2014 Christina Baker Kline, novelist ( Donald Trump (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations- list/donald-trump) President of the United States Publicly reported October 15, 2017 More than a dozen women have accused him of sexual assault, harassment, or other misconduct. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 3 ( her-consent-the-white-house-denies-the-charge/2019/02/25/fe1869a4-3498-11e9-946a-115a5932c45b_story.html? utm_term=.a63ec198874b) \u201cHe was like an octopus. [\u2026] His hands were everywhere.\u201d \u2014 Jessica Leeds, businesswoman ( hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top- news) \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf Back to 1 / 40 Erick Guerrero (/a/sexual-harassment-assault-allegations-list/erick-g Professor, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work Publicly reported October 25, 2017 Two students reported that he made unwanted advances or behaved inappropriately toward them. He has received a suspe temporarily barred from teaching doctoral students. Sources/more info: 1 ( 2 ( 2/22/25, 10:14 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 78/79 \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf \u25cf WRITING: Anna North, Constance Grady, Laura McGann, Aja Romano EDITING: Michelle Garcia, Susannah Locke, Eleanor Barkhorn DESIGN: Amanda Northrop, Christina Animashaun DEVELOPMENT: Ryan Mark, Kavya Sukumar EDITING: Tanya Pai LEAD: Kainaz Amaria Images: AP, Getty Images, Vjeran Pavic, Wikicommons ( Terms of Use ( \u2022 Privacy Policy ( \u2022 \u00a9 Vox Media, Inc. ( All rights reserved \u201cHe was the person who was in charge of basically everything was doing at that moment professionally.\u201d \u2014 Karissa Fenwick, doctoral student ( 2/22/25, 10:15 Erick Guerrero, University of Southern California professor, sexual misconduct allegations 79/79"} |
8,747 | René Olate | Ohio State University | [
"8747_101.pdf",
"8747_102.pdf",
"8747_103.pdf",
"8747_104.pdf"
] | {"8747_101.pdf": "Ohio State University insisted findings from the investigation determined Ren\u00e9 Olate violated the university's sexual misconduct policy. COLUMBUS, Ohio \u2014 Ohio State University's board of trustees has fired an associate professor following a sexual misconduct investigation. Ren\u00e9 Olate called the investigation unfair and disrespectful. Ohio State insisted findings from the investigation determined he violated the university's sexual misconduct policy. According to a July letter to the board of trustees from Ohio State's president in 2020, \"three students in the College of Social Work made complaints against (associate) professor Ren\u00e9 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation Author: Lindsey Mills Published: 4:57 August 19, 2021 Updated: 4:57 August 19, 2021 \uf04b 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation | 10tv.com 1/4 Olate at different periods resulting in two separate investigations by the Office of Institutional Equity.\" Olate has been with the university since 2011 made findings that he \"violated the University's Sexual Misconduct Policy by engaging in unwelcome gender-based verbal and physical conduct that was so sufficiently severe, persistent, and pervasive it created a hostile educational environment with respect to two students; and conduct that constituted quid pro quo harassment with respect to a third student.\" \"Specifically determined that Professor Olate commented on students' physical appearances, described graphic details of sexual assault in a class lecture, commented on a student's sexuality, touched the shoulders and backs of female students, hugged and kissed one female student, and requested to have an intimate relationship with a student, who declined his advances.\" Olate, in a letter to the board of trustees, claimed the process was unfair and there is no evidence. \"Throughout this investigation have told my supervisors and others at that was willing to leave did not wish to stay where my reputation was so severely injured by false allegations,\" he wrote. He went on to write, \"the touching of students\u2014male and female--is a part of my culture. It is not sexual touching and it is not harassing.\" In a statement to 10TV Olate wrote: \"Students have the legitimate right to complain and use the channels created by the university for this purpose university and authorities who have made inexcusable mistakes covering horrible sexual abuses in the past need to look tough today with everyone received an extremely unfair and disrespectful process by the university, including my dean and professionals from the office of equity and inclusion (title IX). Culture should not be punished by Credit: Ohio State University 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation | 10tv.com 2/4 a university who claims diversity as an important value. Please read my letter to the board of trustees. I'm writing a book about this situation to reveal the whole picture about how manages culture and diversity. My solidarity with the students who made the legitimate complains.\" Thursday, the board of trustees approved his termination. War Thunder | Sponsored Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now Crossout | Sponsored Packaging Machines | Search Ads | Sponsored Crossout: New Apocalyptic Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to \u2026 Play Now Top Packaging Trends In 2024 - Take Look Search Now War Thunder | Sponsored War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation | 10tv.com 3/4 ARTICLE... 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation | 10tv.com 4/4", "8747_102.pdf": "Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct 89.7 News | By Steve Brown Published August 20, 2021 at 7:16 Ohio State University / Ohio State University Aerial view of The Oval on Ohio State University's campus Ohio State University trustees have fired a social work professor for sexual misconduct. Donate Wait Wait Don't Tell me 89.7 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct Public Media 1/5 Ohio State / Ohio State Rene Olate is a former Ohio State University College of Social Work associate professor. Two reports filed last year cited unwanted gender-based verbal and physical conduct by Ren\u00e9 Olate that created a hostile educational environment. An investigation by the university\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity found Olate \u201ccommented on students' physical appearances, described graphic details of sexual assault in a class lecture, commented on a student's sexuality, touched the shoulders and backs of female students, hugged and kissed one female student and requested to have an intimate relationship with a student, who declined his advances.\" Wait Wait Don't Tell me 89.7 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct Public Media 2/5 Stay Connected \u00a9 2025 Public Media Donate News Classical 101 Classroom Olate came to Ohio State in 2011 and focused much of his work on youth violence, masculinities and Latino gangs In a letter to trustees, Olate refuted the claims that led to his firing. \"Throughout this investigation have told my supervisors and others at that was willing to leave did not wish to stay where my reputation was so severely injured by false allegations,\" he wrote. Tags News sexual misconduct Ohio State Ren\u00e9 Olate Steve Brown See stories by Steve Brown Wait Wait Don't Tell me 89.7 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct Public Media 3/5 Productions About Editorial Integrity Careers Contact Closed Captioning Passport Help Online File Online File Online File If you have a disability and experience difficulty accessing this content request an accommodation. Wait Wait Don't Tell me 89.7 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct Public Media 4/5 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State Fires Professor For Sexual Misconduct Public Media 5/5", "8747_103.pdf": "Ohio State University Probe Alleges Social Work Professor of Sexual Misconduct By Staff - The Ohio State University (OSU) board of trustees recently fired Ren\u00e9 Olate, a tenured associate professor in the College of Social Work, after two internal investigations allege he engaged in sexual misconduct. The investigations, performed by OSU\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity (OIE), found that Olate \u201ccommented on students\u2019 physical appearances, described graphic details of sexual assault in a class lecture, commented on a student\u2019s sexuality, touched the shoulders and backs of female students, hugged and kissed one female student, and requested to have an intimate relationship with a student, who declined his advances.\u201d As a result of the investigations, Olate\u2019s tenure was revoked by the board of trustees. August 25, 2021 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State University Probe Alleges Social Work Professor of Sexual Misconduct | Insight Into Diversity 1/2 The report found that in 2020, three students in the College of Social Work reported misconduct claims against Olate, who has worked at since 2011. Olate said in a press statement that he is innocent and a victim to \u201can extremely unfair and disrespectful process by the university.\u201d \u201cThe touching of students \u2014 male and female \u2014 is a part of my culture. It is not sexual touching and it is not harassing,\u201d Olate wrote in a letter to the board of trustees. The found in one alleged incident during October 2019 that Olate told a student she was \u201cbeautiful,\u201d invited her to an out-of-state conference, and concluded the meeting with a hug, according to OSU\u2019s student newspaper, The Lantern. Olate says he is writing a book about OSU\u2019s handling of the claims. 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State University Probe Alleges Social Work Professor of Sexual Misconduct | Insight Into Diversity 2/2", "8747_104.pdf": "Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation Published 5:50 p.m Aug. 19, 2021 Updated 6:20 p.m Aug. 19, 2021 An Ohio Sate social work professor was officially terminated by the board of trustees Thursday for violating the university's sexual misconduct policy. Rene\u0301 Olate, an associate professor in the College of Social Work, had been with the university since 2011. His work focused on the intersections of youth violence and masculinities, high- risk youth and Latino gangs. In 2020, three students in the college filed complaints against Olate at different times, resulting in two separate investigations by the Office of Institutional Equity (OIE). Two reports from the office determined that Olate engaged in \"unwelcome gender-based verbal and physical conduct that was so sufficiently severe, persistent and pervasive it created a hostile educational environment with respect to two students\" and \"conduct that constituted quid pro quo harassment with respect to a third student,\" according to a letter to the board of trustees from Ohio State's president. Specifically found that Olate commented on students\u2019 physical appearances, described graphic details of sexual assault in a class lecture, commented on a student\u2019s sexuality, touched the shoulders and backs of female students, hugged and kissed one female student, and requested to have an intimate relationship with a student, who declined his advances. \"The totality of Professor Olate\u2019s conduct unquestionably demonstrates a complete disregard for university policies and directives surrounding appropriate behavior of faculty,\" Johnson wrote. \"Our students put their trust in our faculty and he flagrantly, egregiously, and willfully exploited that trust for his own selfish ends.\" Sheridan Hendrix The Columbus Dispatch 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation 1/2 Five separate reviews took place of Olate's case, and each review unanimously agreed with his termination. [email protected] @sheridan120 2/22/25, 10:15 Ohio State fires social work professor after sexual misconduct investigation 2/2"} |
7,388 | Michael Palma | Iona College | [
"7388_101.pdf"
] | {"7388_101.pdf": "Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York - 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) January 19, 1996 914 F. Supp. 1018 (1996) Darleen E. PALLETT, Plaintiff, v. Michael and Iona College, Defendants. Christine KRACUNAS, Plaintiff, v. Michael and Iona College, Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 0315. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 19, 1996. *1019 Lovett & Gould by Jonathan Lovett, White Plains, NY, for plaintiff. Elise M. Bloom, Jackson Lewis Schnitzler, New York City, George Hodges, Boeggeman, George, Hodges, White Plains, NY, Stephen Holden, Holden Brothers, PC, White Plains, NY, for defendants 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 1/12 BRIEANT, District Judge. By motions fully submitted on December 8, 1995, defendant Iona College moved for partial summary judgment as to the Title claim of plaintiff Darleen E. Pallett in these consolidated actions, and for summary judgment as to all of the claims of plaintiff Christine Kracunas. In opposing the motions, plaintiff Kracunas moved for leave to serve a second amended complaint. That pleading is deemed to have been allowed and served, and the motion is treated as directed against that complaint. Parties Plaintiff Darleen E. Pallett filed her lawsuit on January 17, 1995. She was, at relevant times, an undergraduate student at Iona College. Plaintiff Christine Kracunas filed her lawsuit on March 9, 1995, and first amended her complaint on March 14, 1995. She was a graduate student at Iona College, studying toward a degree in English, and was at the same time employed in an administrative capacity at the College as Acting Director for Public Relations. *1020 Defendant Michael Palma, referred to as Professor Palma, is a tenured full time faculty member in the English Department of the School of Arts and Sciences of Iona College. Iona College, a prestigious non-profit institution of higher learning founded in Westchester County some 55 years ago, regularly accepts and permits its students to accept the various federal loans and handouts which make applicable to this case the provisions of 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq., commonly referred to as Title and sustain subject matter jurisdiction in this Court. Both plaintiffs are suing under Title and Ms. Kracunas has also sued under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e et seq. Supplemental claims have been pleaded under New York law. Pleadings The complaint of Ms. Pallett alleges that on or about May 19, 1994, she was falsely imprisoned and sexually harassed in the office of Professor Palma at an on-campus facility known as English House. [1] 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 2/12 Ms. Pallett alleges in lurid detail beginning at \u00b6 10 of the complaint a conversation with Professor Palma beginning at 1:00 P.M. and lasting between two and two and one half hours. According to her version of the discussion, she had attended at the office of Professor Palma to protest a failing grade on a paper and seek to have her grade raised. During that lengthy time period, she alleges that defendant, in lewd and vulgar language, discussed in detail his own prior sexual experiences, ordered her to read pornographic poetry which contained extensive sexually explicit references and recitals regarding sexual intercourse, inquired as to her own sexual experiences, and made vivid expressions of his own imagination of her reactions to sexual intercourse with him and of having sexual relations with her, recited the content of sexually oriented dreams he had regarding another student named Laurie, and said that he could imagine her naked and that in his opinion most men liked to fuck women. The complaint also alleges that he sat close to her and that his desk was between her and the only door to exit the office; that he kept raising the volume of the radio to prevent anyone outside the office from overhearing the conversation, and that she was thereby falsely imprisoned as well as being sexually harassed. During these discussions, plaintiff is said to have been \"impliedly invited to provide him with sexual favors in exchange for a better grade.\" Pretrial discovery does not support this particular allegation since plaintiff Pallett has testified that she was, as she told Professor Palma, happy to receive a grade of \"C\", and that in her opinion the paper she submitted was in fact entitled to receive a grade of \"C\". This grade was awarded to her by Palma. At the end of the conversation, defendant Palma explicitly warned plaintiff not to go home and tell her family about the discussion. The complaint also alleges that Palma told other students of his sexual interest in plaintiff Pallett, and in other ways behaved like a cad. The Court accepts as valid for purposes of this motion the contention of plaintiff that the entire conversation constituted sexual harassment, and that the sexual harassment continued thereafter. However, in assessing the response of the College, we note that there was no touching during this lengthy conversation, no explicit request for specified sexual favors, either as a quid pro quo or otherwise, and no explicit threats or promises were made. The second amended complaint of Ms. Kracunas alleges that at relevant times she was employed as \"Acting Director of Public Relations\" and was also studying at Iona College for a Masters Degree in English, having completed more than one half of the required courses when she enrolled in July 1994 in a course entitled \"Modern American Poetry\" taught by Palma. She alleges that the individualized student reading list contained vulgar or sexually [2] 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 3/12 explicit material, as well as sacrilegious matter (Complaint \u00b6 11) and on various occasions defendant Michael *1021 Palma engaged Ms. Kracunas in \"uncomfortable conversations primarily discussing sex.\" When calling at Professor Palma's office to receive the promised text materials, he made comments to her which amounted to sexual harassment. Again, as in the Pallett case, there was no touching during the conversation, no explicit request for specified sexual favors either as a quid pro quo or otherwise, and no explicit threats or promises. Thereafter, Ms. Kracunas wrote to Professor Palma and protested his treatment of her. On August 3, 1994, Palma responded as follows deeply regret the distress and anger that have caused you. Your rebuke of me is quite justified. Please let me apologize to you completely and without reservation for the offense gave you through my crudity and stupidity made remarks to you that should never have been made would be only too happy to unsay them if could will of course grade your work fairly. Though cannot deny my contemptible vulgarity would never misuse the grading process in any vindictive or resentful wayor, for that matter, as a form of bribery can be crass and ignoble, obviously, but hope that am not petty or vicious or cruel. Since have made it impossible for you to consult me regarding the written assignments will, if any of them should turn out to be inconsistent with what is expected, return them to you with explanations so that you may revise and resubmit them. For similar reasons would recommend that you submit the essays one at a time rather than all at once. Please do not feel that you are required or even expected to use either of the books that photocopied, if you do not wish to do so; you can, for those two assignments, use any of the sixty or so books on the 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 4/12 supplemental list, or in fact any book by any twentieth-century American poet except for the eight poets on the roster for the course. As have previously told you will of course furnish any statement that the registrar may need, to the effect that you have attended the classes and are fulfilling the written assignments. Once again sincerely apologize to you for my grotesque and inexcusable behavior deeply regret violating your trust and ruining the experience of the course for you, and giving you such an uncalled-for an unwelcome insight into the complexities of human nature.\" (Document 26, Exhibit \"C\") Shortly thereafter Ms. Kracunas resigned from her job and sought medical care for depression resulting from the incident. In her Title complaint to the dated August 31, 1995, plaintiff Kracunas is more specific and alleges that she was, \"forced to resign from my position because of the lack of support and failure to respond to my complaints.\" This resignation was effective on September 23, 1994. Response of Iona College The key issue in this case raised on this motion for dismissal following substantially completed pretrial discovery of the Title claim is whether defendant has proved by uncontrovertible evidence that after the point in time when it knew or should have known of the harassment, it took in each case all reasonable steps necessary to remedy the hostile environment. Murray v. New York University College of Dentistry, 57 F.3d 243, 251 (2d Cir. 1995). The reasonableness of the response by the College to this sexual harassment must be tested consistently with all of the factual background known to its officials. In compliance with 34 C.F.R. Section 106.8, Iona maintains a Sexual Harassment Policy and detailed procedures for addressing and resolving complaints of sexual harassment. The College's Sexual Harassment Policy is set forth in the Student Handbook, the Faculty Handbook, the Sexual Harassment Task Force Statement and Procedures, and the College Campus Safety Manual, all of which are attached as exhibits to the Bloom affidavit submitted on this motion. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 5/12 These procedures, which appear to be in conformity with law, provide for separate steps for resolving a complaint of sexual *1022 harassment which include; mediation, review by the Sexual Harassment Taskforce, and/or direct resort to formal grievance procedures which may be invoked at any time by the complaint during the informal process of mediation and investigation. When a formal complaint in the nature of a petition to the President of the College is filed, an ad hoc committee formally investigates the harassment allegations and renders a determination. That committee's decision is then provided to the President of the College, who renders a final determination. However, if that determination is in support of removal of a faculty member, the due process provisions of the faculty's labor agreement have to be complied with. An institution of higher learning prides itself on its atmosphere of academic freedom, and for that reason concepts of faculty tenure have been established. Defendant Michael Palma is not only a tenured faculty member, he is also the beneficiary of a collective bargaining agreement in which his rights are protected by an active labor union known as the American Association of University Professors. Charges of sexual harassment in the academic world today carry a high level of stigma, and because such incidents usually occur in a one on one situation, and sometimes turn out to be unfounded, a college administrator undertakes a heavy burden in accusing a tenured faculty member of sexual harassment. If allegations of the sort present in this case are true, the faculty member might well be discharged and under the relevant collective bargaining agreement (Exhibit \"K\" to Bloom Affidavit) this may be done only after a full due process hearing based on competent evidence supported by witnesses, subject to confrontation by the accused. It was against this factual background that the College responded to these complaints. It was not until late September or early October during the ensuing Fall semester, that Ms. Pallett, who was then a student in another elective course taught by Palma, reported the May 1994 incident to Dean Michael McGrath. He referred her to Dr. Ingrid Grieger, Director of Iona's Counseling Center. After some discussion Ms. Pallett authorized Dr. Grieger to notify Dean Warren Rosenberg and Brother John Gallagher, the Vice President of Academic Affairs. Thereafter on November 17, 1994, Palma approached Dean McGrath at a football game and acknowledged his regret and willingness to rectify the situation. From this McGrath concluded for the first time that Palma was admitting to having harassed Ms. Pallett. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 6/12 Thereafter, in late November Dean McGrath met with Ms. Pallett and her parents regarding the incident. At that time he informed them that the College could not then take action to dismiss Palma absent a formal complaint because of the level of proof required where a tenured professor is involved, and furthermore that a formal complaint would be required before a hearing directed to academic tenure could be scheduled. This advice was truthful and consistent with the faculty agreement. On December 1, 1994, for the first time, Ms. Pallett made a formal complaint to the College. The College responded immediately by suspending Palma from teaching or advising students and thereafter he was notified that proceedings would be commenced against him pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement looking towards terminating his tenure. Ms. Kracunas' allegations of sexual harassment parallel those of Pallett and are based on salacious statements made to her by defendant Palma during a twenty minute conversation in his office on July 27, 1994 as well as on the nature of course reading materials he provided to her during that meeting, which she has never read. On July 28 and 29, 1994, Ms. Kracunas discussed the incident with her supervisor in connection with her public relations work, Pearl Copeland. On July 29, 1994 she complained for the first time to Dean McGrath. Dean McGrath provided her with copies of the relevant college policies and offered to assist her in filing a formal complaint. At that time Ms. Kracunas specifically told Dean McGrath that she did not want him to take any action at that time and instructed him to keep her complaint confidential (deposition of Ms. Kracunas pp. 90-91). *1023 college official would seem to be morally bound to accept such a direction on the part of a student that confidentiality be maintained. However, on August 2nd, Ms. Kracunas wrote directly to Professor Palma objecting to his conduct and advising that she would not be attending class. On August 4th, Palma apologized to Ms. Kracunas for his conduct. She resigned from her employment with the College on September 23, 1994 and never initiated any further contact with College officials regarding her allegations of sexual harassment. Following her resignation and in October 1994, Dean McGrath contacted Ms. Kracunas to advise her that another student had come forth with a claim of sexual harassment by Professor Palma, and requested a meeting with Dr. Grieger to discuss Kracunas' allegations. With Ms. Kracunas permission, Dean McGrath caused Dr. Grieger to contact Ms. Kracunas to set up a meeting. This meeting occurred in late October 1994. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 7/12 Ms. Kracunas described the incident and turned over copies of her letter and defendant Palma's response, as well as the sexually explicit reading materials which had been given to her during the July 27, 1994 meeting. Dr. Grieger asked Ms. Kracunas to meet with Dean Rosenberg concerning the subject, but Kracunas said she wished to talk with her attorney before doing so couple of weeks later Dr. Grieger again contacted Ms. Kracunas to ascertain whether she was willing to pursue further action. Ms. Kracunas again stated that she had not yet talked to an attorney and was not willing to proceed further until she had done so. Ultimately on December 16, 1994, Ms. Kracunas met with Dr. Grieger and Dean Rosenberg. Dean Rosenberg asked Ms. Kracunas to advise him whether she was willing to invoke the College's internal procedures for investigating her allegations and offered to help her to complete her course work for credit. Ms. Kracunas never pursued the matter further with the College, choosing instead to commence a lawsuit. Notwithstanding the total lack of cooperation on the part of Kracunas, on December 16, 1994, Dean Rosenberg met with Palma, informed him of the allegations and sought his response. Thereafter, he informed defendant Palma and Dr. Pendelton, the faculty representative equivalent to a shop steward, that he planned to suspend Palma from teaching and in fact the College did so. Dean Rosenberg also asked department head Dr. Winslow to make arrangements to have someone else teach Palma's classes. In early January 1995, again with no cooperation from these plaintiffs, Dean Rosenberg interviewed members of the faculty and students and obtained written statements. As was to be expected, on January 11, 1995, the AAUP, the collective bargaining representative for the faculty, through Dr. Pendelton advised the college that the would object to any disciplinary action taken against Palma, presumably for lack of competent proof. Palma remains suspended, but his tenure has not been revoked. The record submitted in connection with the motions is clear that immediately upon being informed of these complaints the College made continued reasonable efforts to resolve the problems of the plaintiffs and to gain their participation in investigation of their allegations and their cooperation in connection with due process proceedings to terminate Professor Palma. They refused or failed to do so, apparently being more interested in pursuing their litigation. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 8/12 Discussion Upon the uncontested facts, it is clear that the Title Claim of plaintiff Kracunas must fail. The Title violation was complete as of the date of her constructive discharge, if indeed a reasonable juror could find on these facts that there was a constructive discharge. This event occurred no later than September 23, 1994. The Statute of Limitations for filing a charge of discrimination with the is 300 days. This plaintiff did not file her charges until on or after August 31, 1995 (see Ex. \"G\" to Doc. 18). It is absurd to suggest that a continuing employment discrimination existed after the employment terminated. For that reason alone, and without reaching the issue of whether there was an adverse *1024 employment action taken by the College in the nature of a constructive discharge, the Title claims must be and hereby are dismissed. Insofar as concerns the Title claims of both plaintiffs, this Court concludes that on the undisputed facts no reasonable trial juror could find liability on the part of the College, because the College upon learning of plaintiff's sexual harassment allegations took appropriate remedial action and to the extent that it was unable to or failed to take appropriate remedial action the College was prevented from doing so by the failure and active refusal of the plaintiffs to cooperate with the College administration in pressing formal charges and testifying at the necessary faculty hearing to terminate Palma's tenure upon the required finding of gross misconduct. Our Court of Appeals has concluded that \"in a Title case for gender discrimination based upon the sexual harassment of a student, an educational institution may be held liable under standards similar to those applied in cases under Title VII.\" Murray v. New York University College of Dentistry, 57 F.3d 243, 249 (2nd Cir.1995). While formulating this rule, the Murray court did not have occasion to determine what standard of constructive notice should be applied in Title cases. In a commercial context under Title VII, an employee's conduct will be imputed to the employer where (1) the employee is in a supervisory role and uses actual or apparent authority to further the harassment or if the supervisor was otherwise aided in accomplishing the harassment by the existence of an agency relationship; (2) the employer provided no reasonable avenue of complaint; or (3) that the employer knew of the complaint but did nothing about it. Tomka v. Seiler Corp, 66 F.3d 1295, 1305 (2nd Cir.1995). Under agency principles, Professor Palma obviously did not have actual authority of the college to act as he allegedly did. Nor would it have been reasonable for the plaintiff's to have believed that Professor Palma was acting with apparent authority. Accepting the 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 9/12 allegations as true, it is clear that Professor Palma was acting adversely to the institution itself, unlawfully, and in contravention of its express, detailed published policies previously noted. Under these circumstances, this Court concludes that any alleged harassment in the present case was not furthered by Professor Palma's actual or apparent authority nor was he otherwise aided by the existence of an agency relationship and thus no liability should attach to the college on that basis. Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391 (D.C.Cir. 1995); Bouton v of North America, Inc., 29 F.3d 103 (3rd Cir.1994); Watts v. City of New York Police Department, 724 F. Supp. 99, 106 (S.D.N.Y.1989) (Sweet, J.). That a faculty member on occasion will violate the published policies of an institution and do so clandestinely, as here, is not a basis for students or employees who have eschewed the established procedures for rectifying the wrong done to them, to run instead to the courts, to mulct the charitable funds of a non-profit teaching institution. Those funds could be used better for the instruction of other students. While our Court of Appeals on occasion has applied Title precedent to Title claims, the question of whether the \"employer\", here the teaching institution, either failed to provide a reasonable remedy or knew of the harassment but did nothing about it, remains an issue in such cases, which must be proved by plaintiff. See, Murray v. New York University College of Dentistry, supra. Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., 957 F.2d 59, 63 (2nd Cir.1992). The institution of higher learning satisfies its legal obligation under facts similar to these cases unless it provided no reasonable avenue for complaint or knew of the harassment but did nothing about it. Kotcher, 957 F.2d at 63. See 29 C.F.R. \u00a7 1604.11(d). *1025 Iona College complied in full with its obligations under the law by providing a policy against sexual harassment and a complaint procedure, copies of which were properly provided to all students and faculty. The College responded adequately to the complaints, which as to Pallett were somewhat late in arriving. That rumors may have circulated prior thereto, as plaintiffs claim but have not proved, does not substitute for actual or constructive notice of the existence of the problem, nor do rumors trigger a duty to respond. Immediately upon receiving notice, the College responded to these cases promptly, effectively and sympathetically. As noted earlier, in the context of these cases we cannot fault a college administrator placed under the seal of confidentiality by a student from adhering to the obligation of confidentiality thereby imposed. The conflict between the obligations of a teaching institution under Title and its obligations to its faculty members under the First and Fourteenth Amendment and the principles of academic freedom which necessitate faculty tenure, were known to Congress [3] [4] 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 10/12 in enacting Title and are a part of the historical and factual background against which the adequacy of the response of the College is to be judged. As noted earlier, the College did all it could, and was, and indeed remains, powerless to do anything more about terminating Professor Palma, absent further voluntary participation of the victims. This has not been forthcoming because litigation for money damages in this Court appears to be more attractive to them. Defendant Palma is not a proper party either as an employer or a teaching institution. The federal claims against him are dismissed on the Court's own motion. Tomka v. Seiler Corp, 66 F.3d 1295 (2nd Cir. 1995). The motions by Iona College for summary judgment are granted in each of these consolidated cases. The various pendent state law claims alleged are each dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter a final judgment [1] Whether defendant Palma is an Instructor or a full Professor is not clear in the record. He is not a department head. [2] Although he apologized contemporaneously to both students Professor Palma has reported to the College a somewhat more attenuated version of his conversations with both plaintiffs. [3] While a supervisor will always in a sense be \"otherwise aided by the existence of an agency relationship\", comment e to the Restatement (Second) of Agency suggests that this exception embraces a narrower concept that holds the employer liable only if the tort was accomplished by an instrumentality or through conduct associated with the agency status. Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391, 1397 (D.C.Cir.1995) [4] At the time of the harassment of Ms. Kracunas the College administration had not yet received information concerning the harassment of Ms. Pallett. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 11/12 This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:16 Pallett v. Palma, 914 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) :: Justia 12/12"} |
8,773 | Ric Curtis | City University of New York - John Jay College | [
"8773_101.pdf"
] | {"8773_101.pdf": "Hamas begins release of six Israeli hostages -- including 2 held for a decade John Jay professors get hit with sex harassment allegations By Melissa Klein and Sara Dorn Published Sep. 8, 2018, 7:31 p.m Horrific video shows teen powerlifting champion being fatall\u2026 Girlfriend beat boyfriend to death, covered his face with\u2026 Dump ambu shoot News Metro Long Island Politics World News 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 1/10 #MeToo has hit one of the nation\u2019s top criminal-justice colleges. John Jay College has placed four professors \u2014 including three former department chairmen \u2014 on paid leave following sexual-harassment complaints, sources told The Post. From left: Marcus Anthony, Barry Spunt and Curtis Ric John Jay College John Jay College campus sexual assault received \u2018delayed response\u2019 as school failed to notify NYPD, release any specifics professor in alleged drug-dealing, student-sex scandal at John Jay College will shockingly return to classroom suspects busted in serious crimes more likely to be re-arrested under bail reform: study 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 2/10 \u2018It\u2019s a place that is supposed to be better than that . . . They should be held to a higher standard . . . Among the accused are Barry Spunt, an associate sociology professor and former chair of that department; Anthony Marcus, a professor and former chair of the anthropology department; and Ric Curtis, a professor and former chair of the anthropology department and former interim chair of the department of law and police science. An adjunct professor also stands accused. After The Post began asking questions late last week about the allegations, the Midtown-based public college\u2019s president, Karol Mason, sent an e-mail alerting students and staffers to the situation. \u201cUpon receiving complaints alleging inappropriate conduct by certain faculty members, we launched an investigation into the matter and have engaged an outside investigator to assist us. We are committed to a swift, thorough, and fair investigation, which is ongoing,\u201d Mason wrote Friday John Jay grad student said of the message was so disgusted that deleted it. For someone to be teaching at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and engaging in [that behavior] is disgusting. \u201cIt\u2019s a place that is supposed to be better than that . . . They should be held to a higher standard . . . There\u2019s no excuse for this.\u201d The state Inspector General\u2019s Office is already probing other employment issues at John Jay, but a spokesman at the office would not comment on whether it was involved in this matter. 00:00 04:00 Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 3/10 There\u2019s no excuse for this John Jay grad student college spokesman would not provide information other than to reiterate Mason\u2019s statement. The college would not say if the accusers were students or staff or both. The college is taxpayer-funded and part of the City University of New York. It enrolls some 15,000 students, many of whom aspire to join law enforcement or already work as cops and firefighters. Public records show Curtis was paid $194,557 in 2017, Marcus got $150,854, and Spunt $125,362. Spunt\u2019s lawyer, Carmen Jack Giordano, said his client \u201cplans on cooperating with their investigation, and he will be vindicated at the conclusion based on the evidence that I\u2019ve seen of the falsity of the allegations made against him.\u201d Giordano would not detail the allegations other than to say they were \u201cvague and nebulous\u201d and made by a single individual. \u201cProfessor Spunt is completely innocent, and it\u2019s a shame how people with hidden agendas and nefarious intentions can manipulate the system and the public in the name of #MeToo,\u201d he said. Spunt has taught at John Jay since 1993. His research has included the history of heroin in New York City. Marcus, whose automatic e-mail response said he was \u201con leave,\u201d declined to comment to The Post when a reporter phoned. Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 4/10 The prof has done research in honor killings, prostitution and the sexual exploitation of children, according to his r\u00e9sum\u00e9. Curtis, an oft-quoted expert on drug use and the heroin market in New York City, did not respond to requests for comment. He joined John Jay as an adjunct in 1988. Tabrina Youmans, a 2017 John Jay grad who did research with Curtis, called him low-key, \u201cunderstanding and approachable don\u2019t see his behavior ever being misconstrued as anything other than professional even outside of a classroom setting,\u201d Youmans said. Classes at John Jay, on West 59th Street, began on Aug. 27. The college faced a controversy last September after Michael Isaacson, an adjunct economics professor there and self-proclaimed anti-fascist activist, tweeted that \u201cit\u2019s a privilege to teach future dead cops.\u201d He was put on leave and no longer teaches there. John Jay College David McGlynn Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 5/10 And last fall, the college came under fire for hosting an exhibit of art by Guantanamo Bay detainees. The Inspector General\u2019s Office last year launched a probe into the college\u2019s employment of two retired cops to chauffeur former President Jeremy Travis, who resigned in August 2017. Both ex-cops were collecting state pensions, and most of their pay came from the Research Foundation to skirt state rules that prevented them from holding taxpayer-funded jobs without a waiver , 9/8/18 'Drunk' man pummels while being treated in ambulance Perspective: Neurofilament Light as a Biomarker in Mouse to Advance Neurological\u2026 GenomeWeb Discover the Magic of Mexico with Our Vacation Deals Mexico Vacation | Search Ads Mexico Vacation Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 6/10 [Story] Blind husband regains his sight, but doesn't tell his wife and he realizes he's been\u2026 Novelodge Which car has priority? 80% answer incorrectly! Tips and Tricks [Pics] World\u2019s First Surviving Septuplets \u2013 Look At Them 20 Years Later Journalistate [Pics] This Is Common in Dubai, And It Happens Every Day Novelodge Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 7/10 Kanye West & Bianca Censori Call It Quits After 2 Years NYPost.com NYU's College Republicans President Resigns After Barron Comment NYPost.com We Now Know Why Dan Aykroyd Was Missing From SNL50 Decider.com Amy Schumer Shows Off Weight Transformation In Topless Selfie PageSix.com [Pics] 10 Food That Unclog Arteries (Most People Ignore) TravelSent [Story] Wife Keeps Locking Herself In Bathroom With Dog Until Husband Notices Mark O\u2026 Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 8/10 The Stunning Tragedy Of Yolanda Hadid NickiSwift.com New Diddy & J-Lo Allegation Has Shaken The Entire Internet PageSix.com Sarah Huckabee's Transformation Is Staggering Sight To See NickiSwift.com Former Star Arrested For Truly Disturbing Reason TMZ.com Powered by ZergNet Jenny Slate allegedly filed complaint while filming 'It Ends With Us' due to 'uncomfortable' interaction: report Why Was Dan Aykroyd Missing From \u2018SNL50 Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 9/10 \u00a9 2025 Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Membership Terms Privacy Notice Sitemap Your California Privacy Rights Influencer hits Elon Musk with paternity suit, seeks sole custody of 5-month-old son: court docs Before you go ... 2/22/25, 10:16 John Jay College professors get hit with sexual harassment allegations 10/10"} |
7,441 | Sidney A. McPhee | Middle Tennessee State University | [
"7441_101.pdf",
"7441_102.pdf",
"7441_103.pdf",
"7441_104.pdf",
"7441_105.pdf",
"7441_106.pdf",
"7441_107.pdf"
] | {"7441_101.pdf": "President Didn\u2019t Retaliate, Court Rules / January 17, 2008 (CN) - The Tennessee Supreme Court dismissed a retaliation claim against the president of Middle Tennessee State University,whose administrative assistant accused him of demoting her for filing a sexual harassment complaint against him. The assistant filed a lawsuit in 2003, claiming Sidney McPhee used their weekend golf outings as an opportunity to touch, rub and try to kiss her. She said he asked her intimate questions, encourage her to talk about sex, and made her come to work on weekends, when he would play music and dance with her in his office. The plaintiff said she was reluctant to report his behavior because of his powerful position at the university, but she finally came forward under the assurance that her identity would remain anonymous. She re-filed her complaint after McPhee and other university officials released press statements that allegedly stripped the complainant of her anonymity. She also objected to their efforts to transfer her to another department. The court found that the state exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct the alleged sexual harassment, and that the plaintiff \"unreasonably failed to take advantage of the preventive and corrective measures.\" See ruling. Categories Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world. enter your e-mail address Additional Reads Subscribe to Closing Arguments Submit Try Litigation Reports or Log in Wednesday, February 19, 2025 | Back issues Log in to CasePortal Saturday, February 22, 2025 Free Litigation Reports Find Judicial Opinions 2/22/25, 10:16 President Didn\u2019t Retaliate, Court Rules | Courthouse News Service 1/2 Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Connect with us on our social channels: \u00a9 2025, Courthouse News Service About Us / Masthead / Advertise / Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Support Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-19 February 19, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-19 February 19, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-19 February 19, 2025 Contributor-Test-Post- 2025-02-19 February 19, 2025 2/22/25, 10:16 President Didn\u2019t Retaliate, Court Rules | Courthouse News Service 2/2", "7441_102.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Allen v. McPhee Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville May 12, 2006 No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 (Tenn. Ct. App. May. 12, 2006) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Meet CoCounsel, pioneering that\u2019s secure, reliable, and trained for the law. Try CoCounsel free No. M2005-00202-COA-R3-CV. October 14, 2005 Session. Filed May 12, 2006. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County; No. 49684; Tom Gray, Judge. Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed. Steven E.Sager, L. Gilbert Anglin, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Tammie C. Allen. Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/27 B. CAIN, Judge. Barbara J. Moss, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Sidney McPhee, in his individual capacity. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; William J. Marett, Jr., Sr. Counsel, Civil Litigation and State Services Division; for the appellees, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Regents, Middle Tennessee State University, Charles Manning in his official capacity as Chancellor of the Tennessee Board of Regents, and Sidney McPhee in his official capacity as President of Middle Tennessee State University. William B. Cain, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Frank G. Clement, Jr., J., joined. Patricia J. Cottrell, J., did not participate State employee sued the State of Tennessee, Middle Tennessee State University, its Chancellor, and the Tennessee Board of Regents for gender- based discrimination in the form of a sexually hostile work environment and for retaliation in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act. Employee also sued the President of individually for sexual harassment and for retaliation in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act. The trial court granted the President of and the State's motions for summary judgment on all issues. We affirm the decision of the trial court in all respects. In September 1992, the State of Tennessee (\"the State\") hired Tammie C. Allen (\"Allen\") as a Secretary at Middle Tennessee State University (\"MTSU\"). Allen assumed the position of Executive Secretary in the President's Office in August 1999, and was later promoted to Administrative Assistant. At that time, Dr. James Walker was the President of MTSU. Upon Dr. Walker's resignation, Dr. R. Eugene Smith was appointed as Interim President. Sidney McPhee (\"Dr. McPhee\") became President of in August 2001, and Allen thereafter began working for him. On October 6, 2003, Allen filed a sexual harassment Complaint against Dr. McPhee with the Tennessee Board of Regents for the State of Tennessee and 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/27 Community College System (TBR) and its Chancellor, Charles W. Manning (\"Chancellor Manning\"). Allen alleged that in August 2002, Dr. McPhee began engaging in inappropriate and unwanted sexual misconduct towards her. Allen asserted in her Complaint that the first incident of harassment occurred in August 2002, when Dr. McPhee invited her to play golf at Cedar Crest Golf Club in Rutherford County. Allen alleged that during the round of golf, Dr. McPhee attempted to kiss and touch her and that all of his actions were offensive and unwanted. According to the Complaint, Dr. McPhee engaged in similar conduct during golf outings on two other occasions, on August 26, 2002, and on October 2, 2002. Allen asserted that sexual harassment also occurred on Saturday, February 15, 2003, when Dr. McPhee called Allen at her home and requested that she report to work. Allen claimed that while assisting with routine administrative matters in Dr. McPhee's office, Dr. McPhee shut the door and asked her to dance. Allen alleged that she unwillingly complied with Dr. McPhee's multiple requests to dance throughout the day and that during the last dance, Dr. McPhee touched her in an offensive manner. According to Allen, Dr. McPhee called her at home again the next day and requested that she report to work. Allen claimed that she attempted to call Dr. Duane Stucky (\"Stucky\"), a former employee, in order to seek advice about how she should handle the situation, but she was unable to reach him. Allen reported to work and claimed that shortly after she arrived, Dr. McPhee began playing music again and asked her to dance. Allen claimed that she complied with Dr. McPhee's multiple requests but that she conveyed to him that it made her feel uncomfortable. Allen asserted that after leaving the office, she spoke with Stucky and revealed the general circumstances surrounding the alleged harassment. Allen claimed that she also spoke with Dr. Watson Hannah, Director, Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost for MTSU, Dr. Richard Hannah, a faculty member of MTSU, and Dr. Bob Eaker, a faculty member of and Interim Executive Vice President and Provost, about the alleged incidents of sexual misconduct. She considered these individual friends whom she believed could offer support and advice. Allen claimed that none of the individuals advised her to report Dr. McPhee's conduct to the Director. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/27 Allen alleged that the harassment worsened in August 2003. Allen claimed that during that time Dr. McPhee asked her to play golf on several occasions and that during these occasions Dr. McPhee asked her personal and sexually explicit questions and urged her to ask the same of him. Allen admitted that although she usually attempted to avoid the questions, at times she engaged in the conversations out of fear of jeopardizing her employment. Allen asserted that Dr. McPhee's conduct continued on September 7, 2003, when he invited her to play golf after the Georgia football game. Allen claimed that while they were riding in the golf cart, Dr. McPhee offensively touched her and expressed a desire to engage in sexual acts with her. Allen claimed that similar offensive touching and comments were made by Dr. McPhee while riding on the President's bus, returning from both the South Carolina and Missouri football games. Allen claimed that Dr. McPhee thereafter began acting distant towards her. She claimed that he did not invite her participate in the annual Neill-Sandler golf tournament in October 2003, although he had included her the previous year. Allen alleged that on September 29, 2003, Dr. McPhee called her into his office and told her that he was going to leave her alone and not \"fool around\" with her anymore. She claimed that he stated that he was not mad at her but that he did not want to be wasting her time and that he had sensed that she had been \"pulling away\" from him. She also asserted that Dr. McPhee said that he would no longer include Allen in any golf tournaments nor extend invitations to travel on the President's bus to the football games. Allen claimed that she told Dr. McPhee that she enjoyed playing golf but that the conduct on the golf course made her feel uncomfortable. Allen claimed that the next day, Dr. McPhee approached her desk and told her that he felt bad about their conversation the day before, that he had difficulty expressing himself, and that some people had trouble knowing when they had crossed the line. Dr. McPhee allegedly stated that he did not want to push himself on Allen and that he understood that she might have trouble telling him \"no.\" Allen claimed that she then reiterated that she enjoyed playing golf but that the prior misconduct made her feel uncomfortable. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/27 Based upon Allen's allegations, the and directed that an investigation be conducted under the supervision of Christine Modisher (Modisher), General Counsel for the TBR. Modisher assigned the investigation to Debbie G. Johnson (Johnson), the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Human Resources at the TBR, who conducted the investigation from October 8, 2003 through October 29, 2003. Dr. McPhee was informed of Allen's Complaint on October 9, 2003, and instructed by officials not to return to his office. Dr. McPhee categorically denied all allegations of sexual harassment. Beginning on October 10, 2003, Allen was placed on administrative leave with pay through October 17, 2003, with the agreement of Allen and her attorney, in order to remove Allen from any further contact with Dr. McPhee. Allen withdrew her original Complaint upon the request of Dr. McPhee because of a medical emergency and the possibility of private resolution. However, Allen refiled her original Complaint as well as additional Complaints for retaliation and constructive discharge on October 20, 2003. Dr. McPhee filed a written response to the original Complaint on October 20, 2003 and an amended response on October 29, 2003. On October 16, 2003, Dr. McPhee issued a press release to the media where he acknowledged that a harassment complaint had been filed against him and stated that he would not address the specific allegations contained therein in order to protect the mediation process. He also asked that the media exercise restraint. Dr. McPhee sent an email to staff and students stating that he had issued a press release and asking that the recipients focus on their work, on the University, and not to become distracted. On October 17, 2003, counsel for spoke with Allen's attorney, who was told that Allen should report to work on Monday, October 20, 2003, in the Development Office at with the same job title, job classification, and rate of pay. The alleged purpose of the transfer was to ensure that Allen was working in an environment free from harassment and any retaliation pending the outcome of the investigation. Allen refused temporary reassignment and notified that she intended to report to the 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/27 President's Office on Monday morning. That was not acceptable to TBR, and thus Allen was allowed to remain on administrative leave with pay. According to the report filed by Johnson on November 23, 2003, there were no witnesses to the alleged incidents of harassment. Johnson found no independent corroborating evidence to support or disprove Allen's allegations and found no other sexual harassment complaints regarding Dr. McPhee documented by his previous employers, the University of Memphis, the Board of Regents Central Office or MTSU. Furthermore, Johnson identified no supervisory conduct by Dr. McPhee which resulted in a tangible job detriment such as discharge, demotion, denial of a promotion, or an undesirable reassignment with significantly different responsibilities. She found that there was no change in Allen's title, job classification, salary, or benefits as a result of any action by Dr. McPhee. However, Johnson concluded that Dr. McPhee's initiating non-work related encounters, such as frequent twosome golf games on week days, hugging on the golf course, explicit personal sexual conversations and innuendo, and slow dancing together in the President's Office on the weekend was conduct that was objectively sufficient to create a hostile work environment and violated guideline P-080. On December 5, 2003, Chancellor Manning accepted and implemented Johnson's report and recommendations in full. Chancellor Manning thereafter placed Dr. McPhee on leave without pay for 20 days, decreased his salary by $10,000 for one year, and required Dr. McPhee to participate in eight (8) hours of employment issue training, including sexual harassment law. Chancellor Manning determined that Dr. McPhee was to remain the President of and that Allen should be transferred to the position of Coordinator in the University's Development Office, where she would report directly to the Vice President for Development at MTSU. In response to a request in accordance with the Tennessee Open Records Act, the released the identity of Dr. McPhee and the nature of the Complaint to the news media on October 14, 2003. The notified Allen in advance that it planned to release the full Complaint to the news media on October 16, 2003. Allen sought and obtained a temporary restraining 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/27 order from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County, Tennessee, on October 16, 2003, prohibiting the release of the Complaint. The temporary restraining order was dissolved by the court on December 11, 2003. On December 18, 2003, Dr. McPhee issued a second press release acknowledging that a investigation was conducted into allegations made against him and that he accepted the Board's recommendations and penalties. In January 2004, Dr. McPhee was interviewed by Sidelines, the student newspaper, in which he stated that a thorough investigation was conducted of the allegations against him, a decision was made by Manning and the TBR, and that he accepted the decision. On February 13, 2004, Allen filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Rutherford County, Tennessee alleging unlawful gender-based discrimination in the form of a sexually hostile work environment and retaliation in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA). Allen sued Dr. McPhee individually for his alleged sexually harassing conduct and for retaliation in his official capacity as President of MTSU. Allen also sued MTSU, the TBR, the State of Tennessee and Chancellor Manning in his official capacity as Chancellor for the TBR. The State filed a motion for summary judgment on April 15, 2004, and Dr. McPhee filed his own motion for summary judgment on November 29, 2004. The State also filed a motion to strike the affidavit of Allen on June 25, 2004 hearing was held on December 20, 2004, before Chancellor Tom Gray. The trial court entered a final order on December 17, 2004, incorporating the court's oral ruling and granting the State and Dr. McPhee's motions for summary judgment but denying the State's motion to strike the affidavit of Allen. Allen filed a timely notice of appeal. Allen raises six issues on appeal. Allen contends it was error for the trial court to find as a matter of law that (1) Dr. McPhee was not individually liable for aiding and abetting under the THRA; (2) Dr. McPhee was not individually liable for retaliation pursuant to the THRA; (3) the State was not liable for the alleged actions of Dr. McPhee under a direct alter-ego theory and thus were not precluded from raising the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense; (4) the State exercised reasonable preventative and corrective measures; (5) Allen unreasonably failed to take advantage of the 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/27 preventative and corrective measures provided by the State; and, (6) the State was not liable for retaliation pursuant to the THRA. The standard of review of a trial court's decision to grant summary judgment is well settled. Since the Court's inquiry involves purely a question of law, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment and the Court is confined to reviewing the record to determine whether the requirements of Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56 have been met. Cowden v. Sovran Bank /Central South, 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). Summary judgment is only appropriate where there is no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on the undisputed facts. Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tenn. 1993). The court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and must draw all reasonable inferences in the nonmoving party's favor. Byrd, 847 S.W.2d at 210-211. The court should grant summary judgment only when both the facts and the conclusions to be drawn from the facts permit a reasonable person to reach only one conclusion. Byrd, 847 S.W.2d at 210-211. I. Aiding and Abetting Claim Against McPhee The first issue Allen raises on appeal is whether Dr. McPhee proved as a matter of law that he cannot be held individually liable for aiding and abetting. The THRA, Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-301(2) provides: It is a discriminatory practice for a person or for two (2) or more persons to: (2) Aid, abet, incite, compel, or command a person to engage in any of the acts or practices declared discriminatory by this chapter. Tenn. Code Ann. \u00a7 4-21-301(2). Although generally, there is no individual liability under the THRA, Carr v. United Parcel Service, 955 S.W.2d 832, 834 (Tenn. 1997), the Tennessee Supreme Court has found that individual liability exists under Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-301(2) based upon the fact that \"the is 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/27 broader than Title in terms of who may be liable for harassment and discrimination.\" Carr, 955 S.W.2d at 835. The Court in Carr noted that the statute does not define \"aiding and abetting,\" therefore, the Court adopted elements of the common law civil liability theory of aiding and abetting. Carr, 955 S.W.2d at 836. The common law requires that, \"the defendant knew that his companions' conduct constituted a breach of duty, and that he gave substantial assistance or encouragement to them in their acts.\" Carr, 955 S.W.2d at 836. In addition, liability requires affirmative conduct by the individual defendant. Carr, 955 S.W.2d at 836. Allen contends that Dr. McPhee aided and abetted the State by engaging in a campaign to contrive, mislead, and obstruct the investigation by fabricating stories which cast Allen in a false light in an effort to undermine her credibility. Allen relies on two Tennessee cases where the harassing supervisor denied involvement in the misconduct and the court held the supervisor individually liable. In Harris v. Dalton, No. E2000-02115-COA-R3- CV, 2001 422964, at *4 (Tenn.Ct.App. Apr. 26, 2001), Defendant denied a subordinate's allegations of sexual harassment and thereafter urged his employer to terminate Plaintiff. The court held that Defendant was individually liable because his denial \"effectively ended the inquiry into the allegations and hence, nothing was done to actually correct the situation.\" Harris, 2001 422964, at *4. In Steele v. Superior Home Health Care of Chattanooga, No. 03A01-9709-CH-00395, 1998 783348, *8 (Tenn.Ct.App. Nov. 10, 1998), Defendant denied allegations of harassment and as a result, no further investigation was conducted. The court held that Defendant was liable for aiding and abetting because the supervisor \"escaped discipline\" and then \"proceeded to harass [the plaintiff] with increasing frequency and severity, until he ultimately resigned.\" Steele, 1998 783338, at *9. In both Harris and Steele, it is clear that the supervisor-defendants acted affirmatively to aid, incite, compel or command their employers not to take remedial action to cure the hostile work environment, either by advising the employer to terminate the plaintiff or by deterring the investigation and escaping discipline. However, in the instant case, although Dr. McPhee denied some of Allen's allegations, there is no evidence in the record that he attempted to persuade Manning to terminate Allen nor is there evidence that he deterred the investigation and avoided punishment. To the contrary, 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/27 it is undisputed that the investigated the matter from October 8, 2003 through October 29, 2003, and at the conclusion of the investigation, Chancellor Manning implemented the investigator's proposed sanctions in full. Dr. McPhee's denial of misconduct alone is insufficient to impose individual liability under Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-301(2). Allen also contends that Dr. McPhee's personal participation in the behavior which created the hostile work environment is sufficient to impose individual liability under Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-301(2). Tennessee courts have yet to address this issue, however, other states with statutes similar to the THRA, have imposed individual liability upon supervisors for aiding and abetting when the supervisor actually participated in the behavior creating the illegal environment. (see Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1317 (2nd Cir. 1995); Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dept., 174 F.3d 95, 126 (3rd Cir. 1999); Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom, 715 A.2d 873, 888 (D.C. 1998)). However, the Tennessee Supreme Court stated in Carr that \"[a] supervisor, . . . may be individually liable for encouraging or preventing the employer from taking corrective action. Absent such allegations, [supervisor-defendants] [cannot] be held individually liable under a hostile work environment theory.\" Carr, 955 S.W.2d at 838. In addition, this Court noted in Harris the difference between the holding in Carr and other jurisdictions stating: In Carr, the Court defined \"aiding and abetting\" as knowing that the employer was breaching a duty, and giving\" substantial assistance or encouragement to them in their acts.\" Id. at 836. The Court thus held that to make a finding of accomplice liability for a supervisor in a hostile work environment, there must be a showing that the supervisor encouraged or prevented the employer from taking corrective action. Id. Cf. this holding with other jurisdictions which have similar aiding and abetting provisions in their State human rights statutes. Most courts have held that interaction can constitute aiding and abetting if it provides \"substantial assistance or encouragement\", that liability for aiding and abetting does not depend upon an intent to discriminate, and that the actual harassment itself can constitute aiding and abetting. See Gardenhire v. New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co., 754 A.2d 1244 (N.J.Super.Ct. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/27 Law Div. 2000); Bogdahn v. Hamilton Standard Space Sys. Int'l Inc., 741 A.2d 1003 (Conn.Super.Ct. 1999); Chapin v. University of Massachusetts, 977 F.Supp. 72 (D.Mass. 1997); Colorado Civil Rights Comm. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 759 P.2d 1358 (Colo. 1988). Harris, 2001 422964, at *3. We therefore decline to extend individual liability to supervisors who participated in the behavior creating the hostile work environment absent a showing that the supervisor's conduct encouraged or prevented the employer from taking corrective action. Because Allen failed to show that Dr. McPhee's conduct encouraged or prevented the State of Tennessee from taking remedial measures, we affirm the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment on this issue. II. Retaliation Claim Against Dr. McPhee The next issue Allen raises on appeal is whether Dr. McPhee showed as a matter of law that he cannot be held individually liable for retaliation against Allen under the THRA. Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21- 301(1) provides: It is discriminatory practice for a person or for two (2) or more persons to: (1) Retaliate or discriminate in any matter against a person because such person has opposed a practice declared discriminatory by this chapter or because such person has made a charge, filed a complaint, testified, assisted or participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing under this chapter. Tenn. Code Ann. \u00a7 4-21-301(1). In order to establish a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge under the a plaintiff must prove the following: (1) the plaintiff engaged in a protected activity; (2) the exercise of the plaintiff's protected civil rights was known to the defendant; (3) the defendant thereafter took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and, (4) that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action. Newsom 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/27 v. Textron Aerostructures, a div. of Avco, Inc., 924 S.W.2d 87, 96 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1995). Allen contends that Dr. McPhee is individually liable for retaliation because he mislead and obstructed the investigation by fabricating stories that cast Allen in a false light and undermined her credibility. She claims that Dr. McPhee accomplished this by issuing press releases which portrayed himself as the victim of false accusations, by making false assertions to the investigator, and by issuing statements which contained false insinuations to employees and students. However, in order to establish a prima facie case of retaliation, Allen must show that Dr. McPhee took an employment action which was adverse to her. Newsom, 924 S.W.2d at 96. \"[A]n `adverse employment action' is a materially adverse change in terms and conditions of employment, such as termination of employment, demotion with a decrease in salary, reclassification to a less distinguished title, material loss of benefits, or significantly diminished material responsibilities.\" Spann v. Abraham, 36 S.W.3d 452, 468 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1999). Clearly, the issuing of two press releases, communicating with employees and students via email, and denying Allen's allegations is not a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of Allen's employment. III. Supervisor-Created Sexual Harassment Claim Against the State The third issue on appeal is whether the State established that it could not be held liable for supervisor-created sexual harassment in violation of the as a matter of law. Tennessee courts have held that under the THRA, \"an employer is subject to vicarious liability to a victimized employee for actionable hostile work environment sexual harassment by a supervisor with immediate (or successively higher) authority over the employee.\" Parker v. Warren County Util. Dist., 2 S.W.3d 170, 176 (Tenn. 1999). However, the defending employer may raise an affirmative defense to liability or damages when no tangible employment action has been taken. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 807, 118 S.Ct. 2275 (U.S. 1998); Burlington Indust., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 765, 118 S.Ct. 2257 (U.S. 1998). 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/27 A. Is McPhee a Proxy for the State of Tennessee Allen argues that the State is precluded from asserting the affirmative defense established by the Supreme Court in Faragher and Ellerth because Dr. McPhee is the alter ego or proxy of the State and as such, the State is strictly liable for his actions. In asserting this argument, Allen relies on language in Faragher, where the Supreme Court noted that the \"standards for binding the employer were not in issue in Harris,\" the Court thereafter appeared to endorse strict liability when the harasser is a high-echelon employee, stating: In [ Harris], . . . [a] case of discrimination by hostile environment, the individual charged with creating the abusive atmosphere was the president of the corporate employer, 510 U.S., at 19, 114 S.Ct., at 369, who was indisputably within that class of an employer organization's officials who may be treated as the organization's proxy. Burns v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 955 F.2d 559, 564 (C.A.2) (employer-company liable where harassment was perpetrated by its owner); see Torres v. Pisano, 116 F.3d 625, 634-635, and n. 11 (C.A.2) (noting that a supervisor may hold a sufficiently high position \"in the management hierarchy of the company for his actions to be imputed automatically to the employer\"), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 997, 118 S.Ct. 563, 139 L.Ed.2d 404 (1997); cf. Katz, supra, at 255 (\"Except in situations where a proprietor, partner or corporate officer participates personally in the harassing behavior,\" an employee must \"demonstrat[e] the propriety of holding the employer liable\"). Faragher, 524 U.S. at 789-790. There are no Tennessee cases directly addressing this issue, however, the Seventh Circuit in Johnson v. West, 218 F.3d 725, 730 (7th Cir. 2000), recognized that \"vicarious liability automatically applies when the harassing supervisor is either (1) `indisputably within that class of an employer organization's officials who may be treated as the organization's proxy' or (2) `when the supervisor's harassment culminates in a tangible employment 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/27 action.'\" (quoting Faragher, 524 U.S. at 808). The Fifth Circuit also appears to support holding employers strictly liable when the harasser is a high- echelon employee. In Ackel v. Nat'l Commc'ns, Inc., 339 F.3d 376, 384-85 (5th Cir. 2003), the appellate court reversed the district court, holding that the record created a question of fact as to whether the alleged harasser was the organization's proxy \"such that his actions are imputable to defendant and the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense is unavailable.\" The court went on to say, \"the issue of whether the alleged harasser was defendant's proxy is central to the resolution of this case because an employer is automatically liable for its proxies' harassment of employees.\" Ackel, 339 F.3d at 382. Although we are not bound by the decisions of the federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court, the Tennessee Supreme Court has recognized that the legislature's stated purpose in codifying the was to prohibit discrimination in a manner consistent with the Federal Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968, and 1972. Tenn. Code Ann. \u00a7 4-21-101(a)(1)-101(a) (2). Accordingly, the Court has held that \"the stated purpose behind the enactment of our will be best served by maintaining continuity between our state law and the federal law on the issue of imposing employer liability for supervisor sexual harassment.\" Parker, 2 S.W.3d at 176. We therefore find that the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense is unavailable to employers when the harasser is a proxy for the employing organization. We must now determine whether Dr. McPhee fulfills the requirements for proxy status for the State of Tennessee. Dr. McPhee is employed by the State of Tennessee at as its President, through which he is the executive head of the institution and of all its departments, and exercises such supervision and direction as will promote the efficient operation of the institution. However, Dr. McPhee, as President of MTSU, reports to the Chancellor and through him, to the TBR. Dr. McPhee is subject to the policies of the and serves at the pleasure of the Board, as an employee of the State of Tennessee. Allen contends that Dr. McPhee's position is analogous to that of a corporate employer's president, (see Ackel, 339 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2003); Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. 510 U.S. 17 (U.S. 1993)), or the principal owner of a business (see Randall v. Tod-Nik Audiology, Inc., 704 N.Y.S.2d 228 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 14/27 (N.Y.App.Div. 2000)), and thus he meets the qualifications of a proxy for the State. Allen also relies on Johnson v. West, 218 F.3d 725, 730 (7th Cir. 2002), where the court stated that \" Faragher suggests that the following officials may be treated as an employer's proxy: a president, owner, proprietor, corporate officer, or supervisor `holding a sufficiently high position in the management hierarchy of the company for his actions to be imputed automatically to the employer.'\" However, the court in that case concluded that Plaintiff's supervisor failed to meet the qualifications of a proxy stating, Although Williams had an important title, \"Chief of Police,\" he had no less than two supervisors (Jones and his supervisor, Cummings) within the hospital and no doubt others within the VA's bureaucracy. As such, he was not a high-level manager whose actions \"spoke\" for the VA. See Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc., 158 F.3d 1371, 1376 (10th Cir. 1998). If automatic vicarious liability is warranted for Williams, there would be little or nothing left of the affirmative defense the Supreme Court took care to fashion in Ellerth and Faragher. Johnson, 218 F.3d at 730. It is well settled that Tennessee's state universities and university officials are appendages of the State. See Dunn v. W.F. Jameson Sons, Inc., 569 S.W.2d 799 (Tenn. 1978); Applewhite v. Memphis State Univ., 495 S.W.2d 190 (Tenn. 1973); Greenhill v. Carpenter, 718 S.W.2d 268 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1986); Boyd v. Tennessee State Univ., 848 F.Supp. 111 (M.D.Tenn. 1994). Because the TBR, MTSU, and Chancellor Manning are named in their official capacities in this matter, the State of Tennessee is the real defendant. We believe, that like the supervisor in Johnson, although Dr. McPhee has an important title, his actions do not speak for the State of Tennessee. Dr. McPhee reports to superiors and he serves in his position as an employee of the State of Tennessee at the pleasure of the TBR. Therefore, Dr. McPhee is not a proxy for the State and the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense is available to the State. B. Did the State of Tennessee Exercise Reasonable Preventative Measures 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 15/27 Allen next asserts that the State failed to conclusively prove that the two prongs of the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense were satisfied as a matter of law. The Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense provides that an employer will not be held liable under the for vicarious liability to a victimized employee for hostile work environment sexual harassment by a supervisor with immediate or successively higher authority over the employee, if the employer proves that (1) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior; and, (2) the plaintiff employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventative or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or unreasonably failed to otherwise avoid the harm. Parker, 2 S.W.3d at 175. It is clear that there are two components to the first prong of the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense. First, the employer must show that it exercised reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment and second, the employer must show that it exercised reasonable care to promptly correct the sexual harassing behavior. In showing that the University exercised reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment, the State points to the University policy prohibiting employee sexual harassment, which is published online and in the Policies and Procedures Manual. The policy states that any employee who violates the policy will be subject to disciplinary action, including dismissal or other appropriate sanctions. Section 1 of the policy continues that any employee who believes that he or she has been sexually harassed is required to promptly report the conduct to the University's Director. However, Allen claims that in order for an employer to show that it exercised reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment, the employer must not only show that a policy was in place, but that the policy was effective. See Miller v. Woodharbor Moulding Millworks, Inc., 80 F.Supp.2d 1026, 1029 (N.D. Iowa 2000). Allen first asserts that the University's policy was ineffective because failed to provide every employee with a copy of the policy and because it failed to train to all employees regarding the policy. However, in Reynolds v. Golden Corral Corp., 106 F.Supp.2d 1243, 1251 (M.D.Ala. 1999), the court found that the employer exercised reasonable care to ensure that its 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 16/27 employees were aware of the sexual harassment policy by posting the policy prominently in the plaintiff's work area. The court reasoned that the employer \"need not establish that every employee read the posted policy to establish that it exercised reasonable efforts to communicate the procedure.\" Reynolds, 106 F.Supp.2d at 1251. Furthermore, the record is replete with evidence of the State's diligent efforts to inform its employees and students of the sexual harassment policy posted its policies on the campus website, created an online training linked to campus websites, and as of July 2002, included the policy in the orientation package for new students and employees. The University also published informational brochures which were available across campus as well as notices in the campus newspaper. In addition brought outside speakers to campus and conducted training sessions for individual departments and offices. Finally, the University required that new employees hired after July 2002 take and pass an online test on the sexual harassment policy. Allen's argument that a number of polled employees had not received training regarding the sexual harassment policy does not alone establish that the University's policy was ineffective. Allen next contends that MTSU's policy was ineffective because it failed to provide a clear explanation of prohibited conduct and because it failed to provide a clear and accessible complaint process which created no unreasonable obstacles. Although the Court believes that the University's complaint process may in fact be deficient, in that it provided for a single channel to report sexual harassment and it failed to provide for instances when the President is the alleged harasser, these deficiencies did not prevent Allen from reporting the harassment nor did it impede from immediately remedying the alleged harassment. The issue here is not a question of the effectiveness of the policy but rather one of causation. In Bernard v. Calhoun Meba Eng'g Sch., 309 F.Supp.2d 732, 741 (D.Md. 2004), the court found that summary judgment was proper despite the deficiencies in the employer's harassment policy because once the plaintiff reported the harassment, although through the incorrect channel, Defendant responded promptly and effectively. The court stated: 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 17/27 [S]ummary judgement is warranted on this record because Calhoon promptly responded to Bernard's complaints of racial harassment without regard to the procedures provided for in its deficient policy. Shafer, although not the proper person to receive complaints of racial harassment under the Calhoon policy, contacted Trumps and Matthews on the same day that Bernard complained about Helms's racist remarks. In addition, immediately upon learning of Helms's harassing behavior, Shafer summoned Helms, who at Shafer's insistence\" apologized\" to Bernard. The following day, Trumps met with Bernard and Helms. In addition to the evident promptness of Calhoon's response, as a matter of law, Calhoon's response to the report of harassment was adequate to remedy the harm done. Bernard, 309 F.Supp.2d at 741. We agree with the reasoning in the Bernard decision and find that any minor deficiencies in MTSU's policy are inconsequential as the deficiencies did not prevent Allen from reporting the harassment nor did they impede the University from acting to remedy the harassment. Therefore, the trial court did not err in finding as a matter of law that the State exercised reasonable care to prevent sexual harassment. C. Did the State of Tennessee Exercise Reasonable Corrective Measures Allen next contends that the State failed to conclusively show that it acted promptly to correct the sexually harassing behavior. Once the employer has notice of allegations of sexual harassment, the employer must \"act promptly and in a way which effectively eliminates the harassment complained of.\" Graves v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., No. 03A01-9501-CH-00012, 1995 371659, at *3 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1995). The reasonableness of an employer's response to allegations of sexual harassment will vary depending on the circumstances of each case and, thus, must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Rabidue v. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 18/27 Osceola Ref. Co., a Div. of Texas \u2014 Am. Petrochemicals, Inc., 805 F.2d 611, 621 (6th Cir. 1986); Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp., 919 S.W.2d 26, 33 (Tenn. 1996). Allen asserts that the State failed to act promptly to correct Dr. McPhee's sexually harassing conduct because (1) the investigation was not thorough and impartial; (2) Dr. McPhee's punishment was inadequate; and, (3) Allen's new position is substantially dissimilar from her previous position. First, there does not appear to be any evidence in the record of inadequacies or partiality in the investigation. Chancellor Manning received Allen's Complaint on October 6, 2003, and thereafter immediately began the investigation into Allen's allegations on October 8, 2003. Dr. McPhee was informed of the Complaint on October 9, 2003, and instructed not to return to his office. Beginning on October 10, 2003, Allen was placed on administrative leave with pay through October 17, 2003, with the agreement of Allen and her attorney, in order to remove her from any further contact with Dr. McPhee. On October 17, 2003, Allen was instructed to return to work in the Development Office at with the same job title, job classification, and rate of pay, in order to ensure that Allen was working in an environment free from harassment and any potential retalitation. Although Allen refused the temporary reassignment, Allen was allowed to remain on administrative leave with pay. After the conclusion of the investigation, Johnson issued her report and recommendations on November 23, 2003, which Chancellor Manning accepted and implemented in full on December 5, 2003. Allen fails to cite any instances of sexual harassment occurring after Chancellor Manning received her Complaint on October 6, 2003. In McCormick v. Kmart Distrib. Center, 163 F.Supp.2d 807 (N.D.Ohio 2001), an employee sued her employer and supervisor, alleging that the supervisor sexually harassed her in violation of Ohio law. The court dismissed the employee's sexual harassment claim as a matter of law explaining: Kmart immediately launched an investigation, and based upon the substantiation of only one of the many alleged comments, Kmart refused to move Spiva to third shift (Plaintiff's new shift). Ultimately, the fact that Kmart promised that Plaintiff would have 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 19/27 no further contact with Spiva, and that, in fact, Plaintiff has had no further contact with Spiva demonstrates that Kmart \"exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior.\" Consequently, while genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether Spiva's comments were \"severe and pervasive\", Plaintiff's hostile work environment sexual harassment claim against Kmart must be dismissed as a matter of law. McCormick, 163 F.Supp.2d at 828. Furthermore, Allen's claims of inadequate and improper investigation derives no substantial support from the record. Allen contests the fact that Dr. McPhee and Johnson happened to be concurrently employed by the for a period of two (2) years; however, Allen makes no substantiated assertions of partiality which resulted from this relationship. Allen also argues that Johnson failed to personally contact a former secretary at the University of Memphis regarding an allegation of harassment despite the fact that Johnson contacted the Director at the campus and determined that the allegations were unfounded. Allen's final contention is that Johnson failed to interview any witnesses after Dr. McPhee submitted his revised written response on October 29, 2003. However, Dr. McPhee submitted his original written response on October 20, 2003, and it is undisputed that 16 witnesses including Dr. McPhee himself were personally interviewed during that time. It also does not appear that the record supports Allen's assertion that Dr. McPhee's punishment was inadequate. Chancellor Manning implemented the sanctions provided in Johnson's report and recommendations, which included a 20-day suspension without pay, a $10,000 reduction in annual salary for one year, and a requirement to participate in eight (8) hours of employment issue training, which included training on sexual harassment law. The Court finds that the State's response to Allen's allegations of sexual harassment was reasonable. Finally, Allen asserts that the State's corrective measures were inadequate because Allen's new position is not substantially similar to her previous position. Following the investigation, Chancellor Manning directed that 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 20/27 Allen be transferred to a coordinator position in the Development Office, where she reports directly to the Vice President for Development. Allen contends that the position has no defined job duties, less prestige, and no supervisory capacity. However, Allen's new position included an increase in pay from $43,072.44 to $47,400.00 and her job duties include responsibility for office budget and personnel. Also, it appears that transferring Allen to a similar position at another institution in Murfreesboro was not an available option. There is only one President's Office at MTSU, which continues to be occupied by Allen's alleged harasser, and there are no other universities or community colleges in Murfreesboro. Furthermore, Allen's highest completed level of education is high school, and thus her lack of a college degree limited the jobs for which she was qualified. Based on the circumstances of the case, the State acted promptly and in a way which effectively eliminated the harassment. D. Did Allen Unreasonably Fail to Take Advantage of the State of Tennessee's Preventative and Corrective Measures Allen's final argument regarding the State's liability for supervisor-created harassment concerns whether the State proved as a matter of law that Allen unreasonably failed to take advantage of the State's preventative and corrective measures. MTSU's sexual harassment policy requires that any employee who believes that he or she has been sexually harassed promptly report the conduct to the University's Director. The State asserts that the purpose behind the policy is to deter further occurrences of unwanted sexually harassing conduct and to prevent objectionable conduct from becoming sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to create a hostile working environment. The State argues that Allen unreasonably failed to take advantage of the University's policy because Allen waited more than a year before reporting the alleged misconduct, which Allen admitted was seven (7) months after she read the policy online at her home. The State also asserts that Allen acted unreasonably by failing to file her Complaint using the internal institutional procedures that were in place at the University, by instead, reporting the misconduct to the TBR. However, Allen argues that she was 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 21/27 reluctant to report the harassment because her harasser was the President of the University and as such, he undoubtedly occupied a position of power at the University. Furthermore, Allen contends that the policy provided that as President, Dr. McPhee would receive notice of her Complaint and authority in the outcome of her Complaint. The Sixth Circuit has held that \"while proof that an employee failed to fulfill the corresponding obligation of reasonable care to avoid harm is not limited to showing an unreasonable failure to use any complaint procedure provided by the employer, a demonstration of such failure will normally suffice to satisfy the employer's burden under the second element of the defense.\" Faragher, 524 U.S. at 807-808. In Idusuyi v. State of Tenn. Dept. of Children's Servs., 30 Fed.Appx. 398, 403 (6th Cir. 2002), a state female employee brought a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim against her employer, although she failed to mention the harassment until after she had left employment at DCS. Plaintiff admitted that she knew that had a sexual harassment policy but she attempted to justify her silence by claiming that she thought that complaints would be futile because of her harasser's relationship with leaders. Idusuyi, 30 Fed.Appx. at 403. The court held that \"it is unreasonable for employees to pass their own judgments \u2014 absent any supporting facts \u2014 about how effectively an employer's sexual harassment policies operate. The plaintiff knew of the existence of a sexual harassment policy, and her failure to pursue a remedy under that policy was unreasonable.\" Idusuyi, 30 Fed.Appx. at 404. Much like the plaintiff in Idusuyi, it was unreasonable for Allen to unilaterally determine that MTSU's policy was ineffective. Allen was admittedly aware of the policy in February 2002, but chose not to file her Complaint until October 6, 2003. Furthermore, although informed of the internal institutional procedures in place the University, which required her to promptly report any allegations of sexual harassment to the University's Director, Allen opted to file her Complaint with the TBR. Allen's failure to comply with the complaint procedure provided by the State as well as her failure to report Dr. McPhee's misconduct until over a year from the first occurrence exhibits an unreasonable failure to utilize the State's preventative and corrective measures. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 22/27 IV. Retaliation Claim Against the State The final issue Allen raises on appeal concerns whether the State established as a matter of law that it could not be liable for retaliation against Allen. In order to establish a prima facie case of retaliation, the plaintiff must show that (1) she engaged in a protected activity; (2) the defendant knew of this exercise of her protected rights; (3) the defendant took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and, (4) there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action. Newsom, 924 S.W.2d at 96. It is clear from the record that Allen engaged in a protected activity by filing a hostile work environment sexual harassment complaint against her supervisor and that the State was aware of the exercise of this right. However, it is less clear whether the State took an employment action adverse against Allen as a result of her decision to file a harassment complaint. \"An `adverse employment action' is a materially adverse change in terms and conditions of employment, such as termination of employment, demotion with a decrease in salary, reclassification to a less distinguished title, material loss of benefits, or significantly diminished material responsibilities.\" Spann, 36 S.W.3d at 468. The Tennessee Supreme Court has held that an adverse employment action must be more than a mere inconvenience or alteration of an employee's job responsibilities. Barnes v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 48 S.W.3d 698, 707 (Tenn. 2000). Also, not every \"unpleasant matter occurring at work and not every action by an employer that an employee disagrees with or dislikes constitutes an adverse employment action.\" Spann, 36 S.W.3d at 468 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1999). Allen argues that her transfer to the position of Coordinator in the University's Development Office was an adverse employment action because the position has less responsibility and prestige. However, the State contends that Allen's lack of a college degree and the University policy which requires that \"[a]ppropriate steps must be taken to ensure that the harassment will not occur\" severely limited the positions which were available and for which Allen was qualified. The State asserts that although the transfer had a different job title and different responsibilities, the 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 23/27 position increased Allen's annual pay, is ungraded and therefore has no established maximum salary level, and merely altered her job responsibilities. In Moore v. City of Chicago, 126 Fed.Appx. 745 (7th Cir. 2005), a former police officer sued the city, alleging racial discrimination and retaliation in violation of federal law. The Seventh Circuit held that Plaintiff's intra- department transfer from the detective division to the patrol division did not constitute an adverse employment action. Moore, 126 Fed.Appx. at 745. The court reasoned purely lateral transfer that involves no reduction in pay and no more than a minor change in working conditions is not a materially adverse employment action. Id. at 911-12. Moore failed to offer sufficient evidence that he suffered a materially adverse employment action. His transfer from the detective division to the patrol division did not alter his title, salary, seniority, or benefits. He cannot establish an adverse employment action through unsupported statements and subjective beliefs that his transfer resulted in decreased responsibility and lost opportunities to enhance his skills and advance his career. See id. at 913. Moore, 126 Fed.Appx. at 747-748. Like the plaintiff in Moore, Allen failed to produce objective evidence to show that her transfer was to a position that was materially less prestigious, materially less suited to her skills and expertise, or materially less conducive to career advancement. Allen's allegations of retaliation are limited to her subjective belief that her new position as Coordinator in the University's Development Office is less prestigious and requires less responsibility than her position as Administrative Assistant to the President. Subjective beliefs alone are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliation. \"Adverse employment action\" within the meaning of is discussed at length in Regnier v. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville and Davidson County, No. M2004-00351-COA-R3 (Tenn.Ct.App. May 11, 2006) (Westlaw, Tenn. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 24/27 Case Law), which is being released contemporaneously with this opinion and to which reference is made for further reasoning. V. Conclusion It is well to delineate what this case is and what it is not. It is a claim for supervisor sexual harassment based upon Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-101, et seq. It is not a suit against the State or Dr. McPhee for invasion of common law rights nor a criminal prosecution of Dr. McPhee. The boorish behavior of Dr. McPhee is by no means sanctioned by this Court. The adequacy or inadequacy of the punitive sanctions visited by upon Dr. McPhee is not a subject for appellate review in this case. Once the standards mandated by Burlington Indust., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S.742 (U.S. 1998), Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (U.S. 1998) and Parker v. Warren County Util. Dist., 2 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. 1999) are applied, the case boils down to whether or not the affirmative defenses offered by Defendants are established as a matter of law. As in Parker, the record in this case is insufficient to establish that Plaintiff has suffered a tangible employment action. She is earning more money and in a position normally requiring higher educational qualifications than she possesses. It cannot be said that the State did not exercise reasonable care to prevent and correct the harassing behavior. It immediately prevented further contact between Plaintiff and her harasser. To keep her in a position immediately subordinate to the President could hardly be called reasonable. To accommodate her apparent subjective desires would require the firing of Dr. McPhee and the hiring of a new president for the University with instructions to the new president to retain Plaintiff in her position as personal secretary/administrative assistant to the president. The State has recognized the transgressions of Dr. McPhee and punished him accordingly. Plaintiff is not empowered to dictate to the State the particulars of business decisions. Bruce v. W. Auto Supply Co., 669 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1984). It is difficult to conceive what more the State could have done to prevent and correct the harassing behavior. This is not a case where no policy against sexual harassment was in place prior to the offending behavior as was the case in Parker. Plaintiff's failure to take advantage of preventive and 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 25/27 corrective opportunities provided by the employer and the affirmative defenses under Parker are established as a matter of law. Finally, there is no requirement in the law that Plaintiff be retained in her position as secretary to the president. It is her right not to be subjected to \"adverse employment action\" as retaliation. Other than her subjective displeasure, no adverse employment action is established in this record. Whatever civil remedies may be available to Plaintiff or may have been available to Plaintiff are not before the Court in this action, limited as it is to Tennessee Code Annotated section 4-21-101, et seq. Summary judgment was properly granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the cause are assessed to Appellant. About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 26/27 Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:17 Allen v. McPhee, No. M2005-00202-COA-R3 | Casetext Search + Citator 27/27", "7441_103.pdf": "mtsu/article_ac8cebe6-0074-5a8d-a42a-513e9f257d9f.html Briefly speaks on sex-harassment dispute at 4, 2007 The Tennessee Supreme Court issued an opinion today on a sexual harrasment lawsuit that rocked Middle Tennessee State University. The suit was brought by a employee against the university president Sidney McPhee. The court found that should not have been granted a summary judgment in its defense against a sexual harassment discrimination claim against McPhee and the university brought by Tammie Allen. On that point, the remanded the matter to Rutherford County Circuit Court, after reviewing the record of earlier litigation there and before the Tennessee Court of 2/22/25, 10:17 Briefly speaks on sex-harassment dispute at | Home | nashvillepost.com 1/2 Appeals.Simultaneously in its opinion issued today, the court ruled that McPhee did deserve a summary judgment regarding Allen's discrimination claim; and, that employer should have a summary judgment with respect to a retaliation claim filed by Allen.The litigation began in 2003, after Allen, a member of McPhee's personal administrative staff, filed a sexual harrassment complaint against McPhee, via the Tennessee Board of Regents.The opinion recounts in detail allegations related to comments and other behavior attributed to McPhee, Allen and those who investigated the matter, on campus. The opinion is here. 2/22/25, 10:17 Briefly speaks on sex-harassment dispute at | Home | nashvillepost.com 2/2", "7441_104.pdf": "71ee2343f757.html The Sidney McPhee Problem 8, 2004 There are a number of mental images created from the sexual harassment controversy that Middle Tennessee State University president Sidney McPhee found himself in recently. For our money, the winner had to be the \"Hey Baby, Why Don't You Just Drop by My Office This Afternoon for Some Dancing\" scene. According to the complaint filed by McPhee's administrative assistant, the school president is said to have called said assistant to his office for some work. When she arrived, music was playing. She claimed he then tried to dance with her. There, opinions diverge. She contends that he touched her in the dancing effort. He acknowledged dancing with her but says there was no touching. Something about the scene lives on in our minds: the president of the state's largest undergraduate institution, in his office with a female assistant, dancing away in the heat of the moment. It is both comical and disturbing. At a minimum, it's not what you expect from the leader of a huge public university recent headline in The Tennessean offered this rhetorical question: \"McPhee: Asset or liability for fine enough question, if we might say so. On the one hand, if, when hearing his name, people think of progress in academics, fund-raising, alumni relations and all the other things that presidents are responsible for, then McPhee is an asset. Unfortunately, that's not what people generally think of when McPhee's name comes up. In addition to his reputation as a dancer, he's also known for having spoken to this assistant of his \"seven wood,\" and he wasn't referring to a club in his golf bag. He is known for his inappropriate groping and touching and for acknowledging that he created a hostile work environment for his poor assistant. He is known for having been suspended and fined by the 2/22/25, 10:17 The Sidney McPhee Problem | News | nashvillescene.com 1/2 Tennessee Board of Regents for his behavior, and for his apparent suicide attempt in the wake of the woman's allegations against him. He is known for instability, bad judgment and poor conduct. This is a critical time for higher education in the state of Tennessee. Basically, it's at a low ebb. The University of Tennessee itself has seen the departures of two presidents since 2001. Wade Gilley left first because of a bizarre plot involving a female subordinate; John Shumaker left after using public planes to carry on a romance with a woman in Alabama and after being outed for a spending bonanza that rivaled a dot-com executive. Gov. Phil Bredesen has been taking stabs at trying to get a grip on the board and its administration. Money is tight; good news is virtually absent. As we look at the picture, McPhee is basically another blemish in the mediocrity of it all. To keep him around is to suffer fools happily. Not getting rid of him as much as acknowledges that higher education here is the provenance of a sexual predator who lacks the mental and moral makeup to lead as he should. Like John Shumaker and Wade Gilley, no image will really ever attach to McPhee's name other than that of a raving bozo who was overcome by middle-aged stupidity. If anyone wants to improve higher education here, they will have to improve the caliber of its leaders. Until someone takes care of Sidney McPhee, higher education in this state will continue to enjoy the reputation it so richly deserves. It will remain, basically, a sad joke. 2/22/25, 10:17 The Sidney McPhee Problem | News | nashvillescene.com 2/2", "7441_105.pdf": "Sidney A. McPhee 10th President of Middle Tennessee State University Incumbent Assumed office August 2001 Preceded by James E. Walker Personal details Education Prairie View University (BA) University of Miami (MS) Oklahoma State University (EdD) Occupation University president Sidney A. McPhee Sidney A. McPhee is a Bahamian-born American educator currently serving as the President of Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU). McPhee, who became MTSU's tenth president in 2001, earned his B.A. degree from Prairie View University in 1976, a master's degree in 1979 from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, and a Doctorate in Applied Behavioral Studies in Education from Oklahoma State University.[1] During McPhee's presidency became the largest undergraduate university in Tennessee and the No. 1 producer of graduates in the Tennessee Board of Regents system is also the top destination for transfer students in Tennessee, the state's veterans, and boasts the state's largest summer session enrollment.[1] McPhee's presidency also coincided with more than $400 million in improvements in academic, athletic and campus facilities \u2013 either proposed, under construction or competed \u2013 including the 2- square-foot, $147-million Science Building that opened in January 2015. McPhee has overseen the addition of almost 30 undergraduate and graduate degree programs, two colleges (Behavioral and Health Sciences and University College) and 12 institutes and centers.[1] He was inducted into Omicron Delta Kappa as an honoris causa initiate in 2010. His previous service includes a number of positions at the Tennessee Board of Regents:[1] Executive Vice Chancellor; Chief Academic Officer; and\u2014in the spring of 2000\u2014Interim Chancellor.[1] He has also served in the administration of the University of Louisville and the University of Memphis.[1] McPhee has also worked to strengthen MTSU's international undergraduate and graduate student enrollment, expanded its study-abroad and cultural opportunities and developed research collaboration with international partners.[1 book of his photographic essays, China: Through the Early life Presidency Achievements 2/22/25, 10:17 Sidney A. McPhee - Wikipedia harassment scandal,-McPhee was the&text=The court found that McPhee,employmen\u2026 1/3 Eyes of University President[1] ( published in July 2012, was sponsored by the Hanban-Confucius Institute and released internationally.[1] McPhee served a four-year term on the Division Board of Directors from 2003 to 2007 and a three-year term on the Executive Committee. He was appointed to the Presidential Commission on the Future of Intercollegiate Athletics in May 2005. In 2010, he was re-appointed to the board and its executive committee as the Sun Belt Conference's representative, which concluded in 2013 when joined Conference USA.[2] He served two terms as president of the Sun Belt and was chairman of its Executive Committee. McPhee co-chaired the Tennessee Legislative Retreat Task Force on Higher Education and was recently reelected to a second three-year term as a commission member of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.[1] In 2011, the university regained elevated status as a Comprehensive/Doctoral institution by the Carnegie Corporation, one of the nation's oldest and most influential foundations. Also, in 2011 and 2012, Carnegie recognized the university for its community service and engagement.[1] McPhee was named Outstanding American University President of 2002 by the American Football Foundation. In 2003, he was listed by Nashville Post business magazine as one of Tennessee's 100 Most Powerful Individuals and, in 2004, he was ranked by Business Tennessee magazine as one of the state's Top 50 Most Powerful African Americans.[1] The Nashville Business Journal honored McPhee in 2013 with its Rutherford County Impact Award. China Agricultural University in Beijing awarded McPhee its highest academic award (Honorary Professor) in May 2007.[1] He was appointed in October 2010 as senior advisor to the Chief Executive of Hanban-Confucius Institute Headquarters in Beijing.[1] McPhee was the subject of a sexual harassment lawsuit in 2003 filed by an employee, which was heard by Tennessee Supreme Court on June 6, 2007. Among other improprieties, McPhee was alleged to have rubbed his pelvic area against the body of the employee as well as making lewd references to his \"seven wood\". He was reported to have attempted suicide when the allegations became public.[3][4] The court found that McPhee had violated the Tennessee Board of Regents' sexual harassment policy and he was given a 20-day suspension, had his salary reduced by $10,000 for one year and was required to attend an employment-issues sexual harassment class.[5][6] 1 MTSU\" ( out_exec.shtml). Tennessee State University. June 2007. Archived from the original ( su.edu/about_exec.shtml) on 2009-11-16. Retrieved 2009-11-08. 2. \"McPhee appointed\" ( m/content.cfm/id/46660 Division 1 BOD. July 2010. Archived from the original ( goblueraiders.com/content.cfm/id/46660) on 2012-02-29. Retrieved 2010-09-25. Recognition Sexual harassment scandal References 2/22/25, 10:17 Sidney A. McPhee - Wikipedia harassment scandal,-McPhee was the&text=The court found that McPhee,employmen\u2026 2/3 3. \"The Sidney McPhee Problem | News | nashvillescene.com\" ( s/article/13009889/the-sidney-mcphee-problem). 8 April 2004. 4 speaks on case\" ( m/news/2007/12/4/briefly_tsc_speaks_on_sexharassment_dispute_at_mtsu). Nashville Post. December 2007. Archived from the original ( tsc_speaks_on_sexharassment_dispute_at_mtsu) on 2010-10-09. Retrieved 2010-09-25. 5. \"McPhee lawsuit to be heard\" ( Murfreesboro Post. April 2007. Retrieved 2010-06-21. 6. \"The Sidney McPhee Problem\" ( m/article_457023a0-f13d-53b3-bfda-71ee2343f757.html). Nashville Scene. 2004-04-08. Retrieved 2023-08-28. Retrieved from \" 2/22/25, 10:17 Sidney A. McPhee - Wikipedia harassment scandal,-McPhee was the&text=The court found that McPhee,employmen\u2026 3/3", "7441_106.pdf": "< pln.org> Nashville's local news and station McPhee Case Sent Back to Lower Court 4, 2007 \uf111 ( (h tt ps :/ /f ac e b o o k. co m / n as h vil le p u bl ic ra di o) (h tt ps :/ /i ns ta gr a m. co m / w pl n) (h tt ps :/ /t wi tt er .c o m / w pl n) 2/22/25, 10:17 McPhee Case Sent Back to Lower Court News 1/2 \u00a92025 Nashville Public Radio Share: (/#facebook) (/#threads) (/#x) The Tennessee Supreme Court is sending a sexual harassment case against the state back to a lower court. The case centers on accusations that Middle Tennessee State University President Sidney McPhee inappropriately flirted with and touched an employee. The Supreme Court agreed with the earlier judgement that the employee did not suffer from discrimination or retaliation. But it did find problems with the sexual harassment policy in place at the time of the complaint. That policy, set by the Tennessee Board of Regents, made the university president the final arbiter of all harassment claims. For that reason, the ruling says it would have been reasonable for the woman to fear that filing a complaint \u201cwould have been futile or counterproductive or would have resulted in retaliation.\u201d The Board of Regents did hold its own investigation into the complaint, resulting in disciplinary action against McPhee. The also changed its harassment policy. Now, if an employee has a complaint against an institution\u2019s president, the case goes directly to the Board of Regent\u2019s Office of General Counsel. 2/22/25, 10:17 McPhee Case Sent Back to Lower Court News 2/2", "7441_107.pdf": "Supreme Court upholds decision in sexual harassment case December 04, 2007 By EDGEMON-Dec. 4, 2007-2:15PM President\u2019s assistant may pursue case against state arising from sexual harassment complaint against university president four years ago. The Tennessee Supreme Court upheld the rulings of lower courts on most counts of discrimination and retaliation in the sexual harassment suit first filed against President Sidney McPhee and the state of Tennessee by his former assistant more than four years ago. But the state\u2019s highest court reversed the lower court\u2019s judgment regarding the Allen\u2019s discrimination case against the state of Tennessee and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Allen failed to present any evidence that McPhee discriminated against Allen in the form of a \u201csexually hostile work environment\u201d or encouraged the state to engage in harassment or attempted to prevent the state from taking corrective action, stated the court\u2019s judgment released today. \u201cThe Tennessee Board of Regents is pleased and gratified that the Tennessee Supreme Court decision in Tammie C. Allen v. Sidney McPhee, et al, which was released today, found that the board took swift and appropriate action to deal with Allens claim of harassment,\u201d the released in a statment today. \u201cThe court affirmed TBRs handling of the Allen complaint throughout the process. \u201cIn its ruling, the court found that the board acted appropriately in removing the claimant from any risk of further harassment, conducted a swift and effective investigation, took reasonable corrective actions, disciplined McPhee, and did not retaliate against Allen,\u201d stated the TBR. \u201cWe are further pleased that the court found McPhee is not personally liable for any of the claimants charges. The sole claim by Allen that has not been dismissed by the court turns on the specificity of the Middle Tennessee State University harassment policy as it relates to instances in which the president is accused of harassment is consulting with the Office of the Attorney General regarding how to proceed on that issue.\u201d Allen filed the lawsuit in February 2003 stating severe emotional distress and an incomplete and biased investigation into the sexual harassment lawsuit she filed against the university president in October 2003. The investigation was performed by the Tennessee Board of Regents, which governs MTSU.The Tennessee Supreme Court hear the appeal June 6 to determine if the Tennessee Court of Appeals erred last year when it upheld a lower court\u2019s decision. Allen lost her case because the courts said there wasn\u2019t any proof she received any retaliation at work or job status due to the sexual harassment complaint. Allen seeks unspecified damages in the suit. McPhee was found to have violated Regents\u2019 sexual harassment policy and was given a 20-day suspension served Dec. 15, 2003 to Jan. 5, 2004. The president\u2019s salary was reduced by $10,000 for one year, and he was required to attend employment-issues training including sexual harassment law. Allen was transferred to the University Office of the Vice President for Development and University Relations and received a $4,000 pay raise. Subscribe You have 3 more free access views left. Please Subscribe to continue reading. Login Subscribe You have 3 more free access views left. Please Subscribe to continue reading. Login Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:17 Supreme Court upholds decision in sexual harassment case - Main Street Media of Tennessee 1/2 Related Stories by Main Street Media of Tennessee Go To The Murfreesboro Post Section McPhee lawsuit to be heard by state's highest court An appeal on a civil lawsuit filed against President Sidney McPhee four years ago by a former assistant will... Firearms appraiser in Franklin aims straight for the facts Firearms appraiser John Allen of Franklin has been evaluating the value of rifles, shotguns, handguns, swords, knives, armor and military... Tennessee Songwriters Week gives Dickson and regional artists a local launching pad The lineup from one of the Tennessee Songwriters Week Middle Tennessee Qualifying Rounds, held at One19 Craft Kitchen & Brewery... Load More Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:17 Supreme Court upholds decision in sexual harassment case - Main Street Media of Tennessee 2/2"} |
7,534 | Wilfrido Corral | Sacramento State University | [
"7534_101.pdf",
"7534_102.pdf",
"7534_103.pdf"
] | {"7534_101.pdf": "(/Registration/default.aspx) (/member/Login.aspx) Home (/) / Blog (/blog/) / Sacramento Professor accused of sexual harassment drops lawsuit Sacramento Professor accused of sexual harassment drops lawsuit by Dr. Ari Novick \u2013 September 18, 2011 Sexual harassment occurs is more places than just the workplace. Take this case of a Sacramento (/Sexual-Harassment-Training/California-Sacramento.aspx) State college professor accused of sexually harassing four students and three professors. The battle started in 2005 and 2006 when four female students told other professors in the language department that Corral took them to dinner, made sexual comments or hugged and kissed them. After being accused of sexual harassment, Spanish professor Wilfrido Corral was fired from the university. He challenged the termination and continued teaching during the lengthy appeals process. Corral sued Sacramento State the same year, alleging that it botched its investigation and discriminated against him for being Latino. He challenged the termination and continued teaching during the lengthy appeals process. Corral sued Sacramento State the same year, alleging that it botched its investigation and discriminated against him for being Latino. But now Mr. Corral has dropped his lawsuit against the university and resigned. He agreed to stop teaching and California (/Sexual-Harassment-Training-California.aspx) State University agreed not to pursue him for defense costs, according to a settlement the parties signed in July. No money was exchanged in the settlement, but the university has had to pay more than $900,000 to settle claims from some of the women who said Corral harassed them. You can see the chaos that can erupt from a case of sexual harassment. Not only does it cost money, but costs jobs and affects people personally lot of this could maybe have been mitigated through a program of sexual harassment training at the university. No comments were made of the training that is in place now, but certainly the administrators are going to take a close look to see what can be done to make improvements. Tags: Sacrament Sexual Harassment Training (/) 2/22/25, 10:18 Sacramento Professor accused of sexual harassment drops lawsuit 1/2 College sexual harassment| sexual harassment lawsuit| sexual harassment training \u00a9 2005-2025 Novick Group, Inc. | Privacy Policy (../../Privacy-Policy.aspx) | Site Map (../../SiteMap.aspx) | Terms of Use (../../Terms-of-Use.aspx) (/) 2/22/25, 10:18 Sacramento Professor accused of sexual harassment drops lawsuit 2/2", "7534_102.pdf": "Meeting: 9:45 a.m., Wednesday, September 22, 2010 Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium Herbert L. Carter, Chair A. Robert Linscheid, Vice Chair Roberta Achtenberg Nicole M. Anderson Carol R. Chandler Debra S. Farar Kenneth Fong Margaret Fortune George G. Gowgani Melinda Guzman William Hauck Raymond W. Holdsworth Linda A. Lang Peter G. Mehas Henry Mendoza Lou Monville Charles B. Reed, Chancellor Glen O. Toney C.C. Yin Consent Items Approval of Minutes of Meeting of July 13, 2010 Discussion Items 1. General Counsel\u2019s Report, Information Trustees of the California State University Office of the Chancellor Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium 401 Golden Shore Long Beach, California July 13, 2010 Members Present Herbert L. Carter, Chair Robert Linscheid, Vice Chair Carol R. Chandler Debra S. Farar Kenneth Fong Margaret Fortune George G. Gowgani Melinda Guzman William Hauck Raymond W. Holdsworth Linda A. Lang Peter G. Mehas Lou Monville Charles B. Reed, Chancellor Glen O. Toney C.C. Yin Approval of Minutes The minutes for the May 2010 meeting were approved as submitted. Concord Naval Weapons Station Acquisition Executive Vice Chancellor Benjamin F. Quillian presented the revised item requesting trustee approval to explore the acquisition of a portion (150 acres) of the closed Concord Naval Weapons Station as a site for a future East Bay Concord branch campus. (The revised item corrected a typing error in the resolution.) Recognizing the need for higher education in the Concord area, President Qayoumi has been engaged in discussions with the City of Concord, federal agencies, and the Local Reuse Authority and has submitted an application for use of the land. The long range build out for this branch campus would accommodate 25,000 FTE. The proposed board resolution specifically identifies certain conditions which must be met (by other agencies) in order for to move forward with the acquisition, reflecting lessons learned through experience with hidden costs and unforeseen problems with previous land acquisitions. 2 Whole This proposed acquisition has the potential to serve public higher education needs into the future without putting at financial risk, therefore any conditions not met will be returned to the board for review and consideration. President Qayoumi concurred with Dr. Quillian\u2019s remarks. He added that Contra Costa County is underserved in that it is the only county in California with a population greater than one million without a four-year public education institution. As a result, while the counties in the general Bay Area demonstrate one of the highest college-going rates in California, Contra Costa County does not share in that demographic. Through discussions occurring over the past four years, President Qayoumi and his executive management team have worked to ensure that will not be responsible for any contamination cleanup of the site either before or after the public conveyance. Chair Carter thanked Dr. Quillian and President Qayoumi for their remarks. He shared his concerns expressed earlier to staff that any commitment from to expand at this time must be made with appropriate constraints to minimize financial risk. He believes that within the context of the conditions/constraints set forth in the item to acquire land for future needs of the university and state, the acquisition was a good idea as long as the financial responsibilities are mitigated satisfactorily to CSU. Trustee Yin thanked President Qayoumi and the chancellor for their work over the past four years regarding this acquisition, stating that he thinks it is a great addition for the university. He asked if there was a timetable in place for the project. President Qayoumi responded that he estimated between five to seven years before the property would be turned over to based on previous site acquisitions. Trustee Hauck concurred with Chair Carter\u2019s desire to mitigate risk to in this proposed acquisition. He supported the item in light of the specific contingencies set forth in the resolution to protect CSU. Chancellor Reed noted that the conveyance of 150 acres versus the initial 400 acres discussed with the Navy was the result of experience with other acquisitions that taught us to be more realistic in growing a branch campus. Experience with California State University, Monterey Bay, California State University, Channel Islands, and California State University, San Bernardino\u2014Palm Desert Campus helped draft the contingencies placed in this item to best protect while it considers future growth and expansion. Trustee Linscheid asked President Qayoumi if student demand for higher education in the Concord area had been calculated. President Qayoumi equated student demand to participation, stating that if participation rates of Contra Costa County are equivalent to those of Alameda County, then the demand is more than 22,000 students. Trustee Fortune asked Chancellor Reed to address the financial cost of the acquisition. Chancellor Reed stated that there would be no cost in the conveyance of the property. He further 3 Whole explained that all of the infrastructure costs for the campus build out would be borne by another agency or municipality and the cleanup of the property would be handled by the Department of the Navy. Trustee Chandler expressed her strong support for the project, commending President Qayoumi for his hard work and persistence in making the acquisition possible. She added that the site is a great location, more accessible than the current branch campus, and located less than a mile from a station. The committee recommended approval by the board of the proposed resolution 07-10-02). Chair Carter adjourned the meeting. Information Item Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 1 of 10 General Counsel\u2019s Report Presentation By Christine Helwick General Counsel Litigation Report This is the semi-annual report on the status of significant litigation confronting the CSU, and is presented for information. \u201cSignificant\u201d for purposes of this report is defined as litigation: (1) with the potential for a systemwide impact on the CSU; (2) that raises significant public policy issues; (3) brought by or against another public agency; or (4) which, for other reasons, has a high profile or is likely to generate widespread publicity. New information since the date of the last report is printed in italics. The cases contained in this report have been selected from the 73 currently active litigation files is the party making the claim in one of those files. New Cases Bordessa v. MacDonald, et al. Contra Costa Superior Court Lauren Bordessa, a student, has filed this lawsuit for damages against lecturer Terry MacDonald and the university, alleging negligence for providing her with an herbal tea (yohimbe) in her sociology class without warning of the side effects for persons taking medication, and for not adequately investigating the incident or issuing a timely warning about the potential harm of the yohimbe. The case is in the pleading stage. Californians Aware v. CSU, et al. Stanislaus County Superior Court Californians Aware filed this lawsuit to compel the Stanislaus campus and/or the campus Foundation to produce the contract that the Foundation entered into with the Washington Speakers' Bureau for the appearance of Sarah Palin at the campus' 50th anniversary gala. The court ruled that the Foundation is not subject to the Public Records Act, is not the alter ego of the campus, and the fact that campus leaders are on the Foundation Board does not subject the contract to production. The court, however, also ruled on unspecified \"evidence\" that because the university had \"used\" the contract in the course of public business, the university must produce the contract. The university immediately requested a copy of the contract from the Foundation and has produced it in response to the court's ruling. Whole Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 2 of 10 Hayden, et al. v. CSU, et al. Alameda County Superior Court Four students filed suit to challenge CSU's decision to offer summer and winter courses on a self-support basis, instead of on a state support basis. They argued that was \"supplanting\" courses in violation of Education Code section 89708. The court ruled in CSU's favor and dismissed the case. Steward v. Guseman San Diego County Superior Court Noma Steward alleges that Dennis Guseman, an employee of San Marcos, struck her and her husband with his car while they were walking in an intersection. Steward suffered severe injuries and her husband died. Guseman was driving to meet friends for breakfast. Steward contends that he was acting in the course and scope of his employment. The case is in the pleading stage. Construction Cases Fassberg Construction Co. v. CSU, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Fassberg Construction Co., the general contractor retained by the Site Authority for the residential and commercial construction of the East Campus Town Center project, sued the Site Authority and the for breach of contract and the value of services provided. Fassberg asserted that the Site Authority improperly terminated Fassberg's contract and that it owes approximately $5.8 million for work Fassberg performed. Fassberg already unsuccessfully pursued this claim before the Contractors Review Board. The tendered its defense to the Site Authority, which has been accepted. On April 29, 2010, Fassberg dismissed the action against and the Site Authority in exchange for a waiver of its costs. NetVersant v. Helix Electric, et al. San Diego County Superior Court In 2007, Netversant Solutions, a subcontractor, brought an action against Helix Electric, the general contractor on SDSU's telecommunications infrastructure project. The lawsuit includes claims for the reasonable value of work performed, breach of the subcontract, breach of the implied warranty of the fitness of plans, recovery on the bonds, and declaratory relief. In 2009 Helix cross-complained against for breach of the prime contract and for implied contractual indemnity for any damages arising out of Netversant's claims against Helix. Helix also cross- claimed against Netversant's surety, which provided the performance bond on the subcontract filed a cross-complaint against Helix, its surety and Netversant. The case is in the discovery stage. Trial is set for January 7, 2011. Whole Agenda Item September 21-22, 2010 Page 3 of 10 Employment Cases Baxter-White v. CSU, et al. San Diego County Superior Court Kathryn Baxter-White, a former temporary student health center accounting technician, sued and three individuals for alleged retaliation under the state whistleblower statute, alleging she was retaliated against for complaining that incorrectly billed a Medi-Cal program. The lawsuit requests that the court reverse the University's determination that there was no whistleblower retaliation, and allow her to pursue her claim for money damages for breach of contract and violation of the whistleblower statutes. In May 2010, the court upheld the determination that there was no retaliation. However, in Runyon (see below), another whistleblower retaliation case, the California Supreme Court held that whistleblower retaliation plaintiffs may proceed with a civil action for damages without having overturned the administrative determination. In June 2010, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all causes of action other than those for violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act filed a motion to dismiss the remaining cause of action because Plaintiff failed to timely file a government claim before filing her lawsuit. The motion will be heard on September 3, 2010. No trial date has been set. Brown v. CSU, et al. Fresno County Superior Court Auwana Brown, a former Fresno State police officer, settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against the University in 1998. As a part of the settlement, Brown agreed to a future resignation after she vested in the state retirement plan (i.e., by August 31, 2000). After a large verdict in another Fresno State police department case was entered on August 11, 2000, Brown asked to unilaterally rescind her resignation less than two weeks before it was to become effective. The campus denied her request. Brown petitioned the State Personnel Board to reinstate her. The refused, and Brown then petitioned the court to order the to set aside her resignation. The court instead sent the case back to the for further findings. After three years of inactivity, the issued a second decision denying Brown reinstatement. Brown also filed a civil suit for damages. Both cases were consolidated, but her civil suit was stayed while Brown further challenged the SPB's decision. In November 2008, the court denied Brown's (second) petition to set aside her resignation. Brown claimed in her lawsuit for damages that the term in her settlement agreement that bars her reemployment is in violation of public policy filed a challenge to the legal sufficiency of her civil claim. The court imposed a further stay of the proceedings, and ordered Brown to appeal the November 2008 writ decision before any ruling would be made on her claim for damages. The court of appeal denied Brown's request. The trial court then granted CSU's legal challenge to the sufficiency of Brown's remaining Whole Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 4 of 10 claims, dismissing the case. Brown has filed an appeal of the trial court judgment. The appeal is in the briefing stage. Buffard, et al. v. CSU, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Nicole Buffard, Marjorie Gelus and Kathleen Moore, female faculty members in the Foreign Languages department at Sacramento, claim that their colleague, Wilfrido Corral, who had served as department chair, discriminated, harassed and retaliated against them based on their gender and sexual orientation. They also claim that the University was on notice of Corral's behavior and failed to adequately investigate or correct it. The case is in the discovery phase. Corral v. CSU, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Wilfrido Corral is a faculty member of Hispanic and \"Amerindian\"descent at Sacramento and former chair of the Foreign Languages department. He was investigated in 2006 for sexually harassing four students and ultimately reprimanded. The university paid $15,000 in settlement on the claim of one of the students. Corral now claims that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of his race, national origin and gender. He also claims that the University did not give him proper notice of the underlying allegations during the investigation. The case is in the discovery phase. Ohton v. SDSU, et al. San Diego County Superior Court David Ohton, a strength and fitness coach, sued and various individuals for alleged retaliation under the state whistleblower statute, claiming he was retaliated against for statements he made in CSU's investigative audit of alleged improprieties in the Athletics Department and equipment room. The trial court granted CSU's motion for summary judgment on the ground that Ohton had not sought to reverse the University's administrative determination that there was no retaliation, before filing suit. Ohton appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed and instructed the trial court to give Ohton an opportunity to amend his complaint. Ohton then amended his complaint and added a new petition for writ of mandate to reverse the University's administrative determination. The trial court again ruled in CSU's favor, finding that CSU's process met the requirements of the California Whistleblower Protection Act. Ohton filed a second lawsuit and writ petition seeking to set aside a later administrative finding that subsequent actions were also not retaliatory for his participation in the 2002-03 audit. The court stayed the second Ohton lawsuit as Ohton appealed the decision in the first. In January 2010, the Court of Appeals reversed and ordered the trial court to grant's Ohton's petition to overturn CSU's administrative determination. The appellate court found that did not satisfactorily address Ohton's complaint because it incorrectly found that Ohton's allegation Whole Agenda Item September 21-22, 2010 Page 5 of 10 about a coach being drunk was not made in good faith, and because CSU's final determination failed to address whether employees were disciplined or referred for criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court subsequently held in Runyon (see below), another whistleblower retaliation case, that whistleblower plaintiffs may pursue a civil action without first overturning an administrative determination. This case has therefore been returned to the trial court for a trial on the merits of the underlying claim. Runyon v. CSULB, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court L.R. Runyon, a professor in the Finance Department of the College of Business at Long Beach, alleges he was removed from his position as department chair in retaliation for reporting alleged improper activities by the Dean of the College of Business, Luis Calingo. Runyon made various complaints to his supervisors and others that the Dean made inappropriate and wasteful business trips and spent too much time away from campus. The Dean subsequently removed Runyon as chair of the department citing Runyon's failure to meet certain performance objectives. An investigation into Runyon's claims of retaliation concluded that he was removed as department chair for performance reasons and not in retaliation for his complaints about the Dean. In 2006, the court granted CSU's motion for summary judgment. Runyon appealed. In 2008 the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment in CSU's favor. On May 3, 2010, the California Supreme Court set aside the summary judgment. The Court ruled that the whistleblower must be satisfied with the outcome of an internal administrative process before can argue that the complaint has been \"satisfactorily addressed.\" The case has now been sent back to the trial court for trial on the merits of the underlying claim new trial date has not yet been set. Verellen v. CSU, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Paul Verellen, a systemwide manager in the Chancellor's Office, was non-retained in March 2008 for performance reasons. In September 2007, immediately after learning informally of his supervisor's dissatisfaction with his performance, Verellen filed a whistleblower complaint that a labor relations consultant was improperly retained by the CSU. After he was formally advised a few days later that he would not receive a merit salary increase because of his performance, he filed a whistleblower retaliation complaint and a complaint of age discrimination. He filed a second retaliation complaint after he was non-retained. His retaliation and age discrimination complaints were investigated and rejected. Verellen then filed a petition for writ of mandate claiming the retaliation investigative outcomes are wrong and requesting reinstatement. He also filed a separate complaint for damages for whistleblower retaliation (under other statutes) and age discrimination. Following the California Supreme Court's decision in Runyon (see above), Verellen withdrew his writ proceeding and filed an amended damages complaint. The case is in the pleading stage. Whole Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 6 of 10 Environmental Cases City of Hayward v Hayward Area Planning Association; Old Highlands Homeowners Alameda County Superior Court The City of Hayward filed a challenge to the 2009 Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, claiming, among other things, that the University failed to adequately analyze impacts on public services, including police, fire, and emergency services. The City specifically demands that the University provide funding for additional fire facilities. The Hayward Area Planning Association and Old Highlands Homeowners Association, two local residential homeowners' associations, filed a second challenge to the 2009 Master Plan EIR, alleging shortcomings in nearly every aspect of the environmental findings, with a particular emphasis on the University's alleged failure to consider bus and other improvements to public transit access to the campus. The cases are coordinated and hearing is scheduled on both challenges for September 9, 2010. City of San Diego v. Trustees, et al. Del Cerro Action Council v. Trustees, et al. City of San Diego, et al. v v. CSU, et al v. CSU, et al. San Diego County Superior Court The for the 2005 Master Plan was challenged in three lawsuits filed by the City of San Diego, Alvarado Hospital and Del Cerro Neighborhood Association, each alleging the did not adequately address necessary mitigation measures The Alvarado lawsuit was dismissed. After the Supreme Court's City of Marina decision prepared a revised 2007 Master Plan that was challenged again by the City of San Diego, the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System and the San Diego Association of Governments. Each alleged that the did not adequately address necessary mitigation measures and that the must fund all mitigation cost, irrespective of Legislative funding. The Del Cerro lawsuit and these three lawsuits have been consolidated. In February 2010, the court denied the challenges to SDSU's 2007 Master Plan EIR, finding that met all of the requirements of the City of Marina decision and by requesting Legislative funding to cover the cost of local infrastructure improvements is not required to fund those projects on its own, or to consider other sources of funding for them. The decision also held that the properly considered potential impacts, was supported by substantial evidence, that properly consulted with SANDAG, and that petitioners were barred from Whole Agenda Item September 21-22, 2010 Page 7 of 10 proceeding on the issue of other sources of funding because it was not raised by them in the underlying administrative proceedings. The City of San Diego and have appealed. Del Cerro agreed to dismiss its lawsuit in exchange for CSU's waiver of its costs. LandValue 77, et al. v. CSU, et al. Fresno County Superior Court LandValue 77, a private business entity in Fresno, filed a challenge to the Campus Pointe project, together with a claim of conflict of interest involving former Trustee Moctezuma Esparza, whose company will operate a movie theater in the project. In July 2009, the court determined that the environmental impact analysis for Campus Pointe is in full compliance with CEQA, except for additional analysis required on overflow parking and traffic, and certain water and air quality issues. The court also determined that because former Trustee Esparza had a financial interest in a sublease between Maya Cinemas and Kashian Enterprises, the developer on the project, an irresolvable conflict of interest existed when the Board took the vote on the Campus Pointe EIR, and the theater sublease must be voided as a result. LandValue has appealed the trial court's ruling. The appeal has not yet been set for argument. Personal Injury Cases Daves v. City of San Bernardino, et al. San Bernardino County Superior Court The father and son of decedent, Russell Daves, filed this wrongful death action against CSU, the City and County of San Bernardino and the State. Daves presented as a suspicious person in the hillside of the campus at the time of the severe wild land fires of 2007. University police attempted to approach him and Daves fled. The police pursued him and were joined by the San Bernardino Police Department. The decedent was shot and killed after he backed his vehicle in the direction of the officers threatening their lives has agreed to settle the action for $5,000 in exchange for a full release. Plaintiffs have settled their claim with the City of San Bernardino for $10,000. Because one of the plaintiffs is a minor, the Court must approve the settlement. Plaintiffs' petition for approval is pending. Sandford v. Louis, et al. San Diego County Superior Court Nicholas Sandford, a member of the 2008 football team, filed this action against former teammate Louis, CSU, and former head football coach Long for battery, negligent supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The action arises out of an altercation between Sandford and Louis, which culminated in Louis attacking Sandford in a meeting room at the athletic center. Sandford suffered a concussion, ruptured eardrum and facial injuries. In March 2010, Louis pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in a separate criminal action. CSU's Whole Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 8 of 10 motion to dismiss will be heard October 8 and mediation is scheduled on October 13, 2010. Trial is set for February 10, 2011. Vega v. State of California, et al. Santa Clara County Superior Court Melissa Vega, a freshman student, fell out of a second floor dormitory window and is now a paraplegic. She had a blood alcohol of .19 at the time of the accident. She has filed this lawsuit alleging that the university's premises were unsafe. She claims that there should have been safety locks on the windows, bunk beds should not have been placed adjacent to a large window, and three students should not have been in a room designed for two. Parties have agreed to participate in a mediation on November 16, 2010. This case is in the discovery stage. Student Cases Balderramos v Santa Clara County Superior Court Alfredo Balderramos, a student at SJSU, filed this writ action to overturn a disciplinary sanction imposed during his freshman year after he was found to have made a threat of physical harm towards other students. His writ challenges procedural aspects of the disciplinary process, including whether hearsay testimony can support the imposition of discipline. Balderramos has taken no steps to complete preparation of the administrative record, a prerequisite to having the court hear the case. Balderramos subsequently withdrew from and is no longer a student. In April 2010, the case settled as agreed to remove the discipline sanction from the former student's file. Donselman, et al. v San Francisco County Superior Court This is a purported class action filed by six students, challenging the July 2009 state university fee, and non-resident tuition increases and the May 2009 Graduate Business Professional fee, which were approved for the Fall term. Plaintiffs' application for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction were denied. The case is in the discovery stage. The motion for class certification is scheduled for December 3, 2010. Every Nation Campus Ministries, etc. v. Reed, et al. U.S. District Court, San Diego group of Christian student organizations and students at the San Diego and Long Beach campuses sued under various legal theories to challenge the constitutionality of the anti- discrimination policy, which refuses recognition of student organizations that discriminate on the basis of religion, sexual orientation or marital status. The plaintiff groups exclude non- Christians, homosexuals and others from joining or becoming officers. They allege that their First Amendment rights of freedom of religion and association trump CSU's anti-discrimination Whole Agenda Item September 21-22, 2010 Page 9 of 10 prohibition, and that they must be recognized and provided full access to University facilities. The court denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, and both sides filed summary judgment motions. In February 2009, the court found CSU's non-discrimination policy constitutional, and granted CSU's summary judgment motion. Plaintiffs appealed. These issues were also raised in several similar suits throughout the nation. The United States Supreme Court has recently affirmed a judgment upholding a similar University of California policy. Martinez, et al. v. Regents of the UC, et al. Yolo County Superior Court This is a class action filed by non-resident citizen students against UC, CSU, and the California Community Colleges, challenging the exemption from out-of-state tuition for those, including undocumented immigrants, who meet the three year California high school attendance requirement of AB540. Plaintiffs allege AB540 violates federal immigration laws, the U.S. and California Constitutions, and the Unruh Act. Plaintiffs seek an injunction enjoining enforcement of AB540, a declaration that the statute is unlawful, class-wide tuition restitution, damages, and attorney fees. Defendants collectively filed motions to dismiss, which were granted. Plaintiffs appealed. The appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, remanding the matter back to the trial court. Defendants petitioned the California Supreme Court and review was granted. Oral argument has not yet been set. Torres v. CSU, et al. Alameda County Superior Court Jerri Ann Torres, a East Bay student, alleges she was sexually harassed by a faculty member. The harassment consisted of unwelcomed kissing, touching, and holding, as well as other verbal harassment. The faculty member was separately represented at his own expense. The matter settled in June 2010 for $48,500. The faculty member paid $26,000 and paid $22,500. Other Cases Kemper v. CSU, et al. Sacramento County Superior Court Edward Kemper, a campus visitor, alleges that he encountered architectural barriers on the Sacramento campus, such as an impeded path of travel, lack of access to a performance stage, insufficient handrails, and lack of appropriate ramps, all of which impeded his ability to attend an event and constitute disability discrimination. The case is in the pleading stage. Kemper has sued several other public agencies on similar theories case management conference is set for November 4, 2010. SETC-United v. CSU, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Whole Agenda Item 1 September 21-22, 2010 Page 10 of 10 The State Employees Trades Council's collective bargaining agreement with expired on June 30, 2008. The Education Code requires that prevailing wages be paid to certain hourly laborers unless a collective bargaining agreement states otherwise claims that when its collective bargaining agreement expired, its employees should have been paid prevailing wages. Because pays employees on a monthly, not an hourly basis, the Education Code requirement should not apply. The case is in the discovery phase. Administrative Hearings Report The outcomes in the following administrative hearings during this reporting period raise significant public policy issues and/or have broad impact on the system v The California Faculty Association claimed in this unfair labor practice charge before the Public Employee Relations Board that violated by: (1) not giving the union an opportunity to meet and confer before agreeing to the Governor\u2019s request to reduce expenditures by $31 million in the 2008-09 fiscal year; (2) issuing a false statement that the reduction was mandatory, when it was voluntary; (3) \u201cgiving back\u201d funds while refusing to give members salary increases as conditionally promised in the collective bargaining agreement; and (4) issuing a press release that misrepresented the union\u2019s position in bargaining. The Administrative Law Judge ruled against on all grounds. The matter was not appealed to the full Public Employee Relations Board. Kennedy v After Police Officer Richard Kennedy was found to have been at fault in a traffic accident while on patrol, he was restricted to foot and bicycle patrol for six months and directed to retake the defensive driver course. He filed this challenge with the State Personnel Board argued that the Board lacked jurisdiction over temporary changes in job duties. Kennedy argued that the action was punitive under the Police Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights which entitled him to a hearing. The State Personnel Board ruled in CSU\u2019s favor that its jurisdiction is limited to situations set forth in the Education Code. The Board also noted that even if the action were punitive under the Police Officers\u2019 Bill of Rights, the details of any administrative appeal are for the employer to determine, and there is no entitlement to hearing before the State Personnel Board.", "7534_103.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Aguilar v. Corral United States District Court, E.D. California Oct 9, 2007 NO. CIV. S-07-1601 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2007) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Delegate legal research to CoCounsel, your new legal assistant. Try CoCounsel free NO. CIV. S-07-1601 LKK/KJM. October 9, 2007 KARLTON, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Judy Aguilar alleges that she was sexually harassed while a student at California State University. She has brought suit against one of her former professors, Wilfrido Corral, and the Board of Trustees of California State University Board\"). Pending before the court are two motions Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/13 In the fall of 2005, plaintiff took a Spanish language class at Sacramento with professor Wilfrido Corral, who is employed by the Board. Compl. \u00b6 13. While taking the class, plaintiff told defendant Corral that she was falling behind in her studies due to stress in her marriage, and asked Corral for help. Compl. \u00b6 14. to dismiss, one filed by Corral and one by the Board. The court resolves the motions upon the parties' briefs and after oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. *2 2 I. Background 1 1 As alleged in plaintiff's complaint. After class one day in November 2005, Corral asked plaintiff how things were going for her at home. Compl. \u00b6 15. Plaintiff responded that she was still having problems but that she was taking things one day at a time. Id. Corral then allegedly lean in toward plaintiff and told plaintiff that she could hold out sexually on her husband. Id. He also allegedly told plaintiff that he had a high libido and that he had previously had an affair with his present wife while still married to his first wife. Id. Corral then asked plaintiff what type of birth control she was using and where she lived. Id. Corral said not to worry about plaintiff's husband because he would help her, and then hugged and kissed plaintiff. Id. Plaintiff maintains that throughout all the fall 2005 semester, Corral would \"leer, gaze and stare\" at plaintiff's breasts both in the classroom and wherever else she encountered him. Compl. \u00b6 17. Plaintiff took a subsequent Spanish class from Corral the following semester \u2014 a class that she alleges she *3 needed to take in order to obtain her degree \u2014 and alleges that this same staring occurred in the spring 2006 semester. Id. 3 In April 2006, Corral invited plaintiff and a close friend of plaintiff out to dinner to celebrate the birthday of plaintiff's friend. Compl. \u00b6 19. Plaintiff alleges that she agreed to go in order to address Corral's previous conduct and the problems it had caused her. Id. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Corral discussed sexual matters during the dinner, such as suggesting that if 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/13 a person was in a bad relationship, it was okay to cheat.Id. After dinner was over, Corral hugged and kissed plaintiff.Id. On another occasion, when plaintiff was walking to class, she pulled her backpack up on her shoulders, which caused her shirt to rise, and defendant remarked from behind her that he was watching her. Compl. \u00b6 23. Plaintiff alleges that she experienced anxiety attacks as a result of Corral's actions and missed class sessions as a result of the anxiety. Compl. \u00b6 22. On November 6, 2006, plaintiff filed a discrimination and sexual harassment complaint against defendants and Corral with the California Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board (\"Government Claims Board\"). On February 22, 2007, the Government Claims Board rejected plaintiff's claim. In the present action, plaintiff alleges six causes of action: (1) sexual harassment, (2) \"violation of public policy,\" (3) \"ratification of acts of employee,\" (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (5) violation of Title IX, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq., and (6) breach of contract. In her opposition to the motions *4 to dismiss, she abandoned her breach of contract claim. 4 II. Standard On a motion to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true. See Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 322 (1972). The court is bound to give the plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the \"well-pleaded\" allegations of the complaint. See Retail Clerks Intern. Ass'n, Local 1625 v. Schermerhorn, 373 U.S. 746, 753 n. 6 (1963). Thus, the plaintiff need not necessarily plead a particular fact if that fact is a reasonable inference from facts properly alleged. See id.; see also Wheeldin v. Wheeler, 373 U.S. 647, 648 (1963) (inferring fact from allegations of complaint). In general, the complaint is construed favorably to the pleader. See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974). The court may not dismiss the complaint if there is a plausible, reasonably founded hope that the plaintiff may show a set of facts consistent with the allegations. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/13 Plaintiff's first cause of action is for sexual harassment. Both defendants appear to concede that California statutes recognize a cause of action for sexual harassment, see, e.g., Cal. Educ. Code \u00a7 66250 et seq. (\"Sex Equity in Education Act\"), but argue for dismissal on the basis that plaintiff has not specifically identified these statutes in her complaint plaintiff, however, \"is not required to state the statutory . . . basis for his [or her] claim, only the facts underlying it.\"McCalden v. California Library Ass'n, 955 F.2d 1214, 1223 (9th Cir. 1990). See also Haddock v. Bd. of Dental Exam'rs of California, 777 F.2d 462, 464 (9th Cir. 1985) (complaint \"should not be dismissed if it states a claim under any legal theory, even if the plaintiff erroneously relies on a different legal theory\"). Accordingly, the court denies the motion to dismiss the sexual harassment claim. 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1967-69 (2007). In spite of the deference the court is bound to pay to the plaintiff's allegations, however, it is not proper for the court to assume that \"the [plaintiff] can prove facts which [he or she] has not alleged, or that the defendants have violated the . . . laws in ways that have not been alleged.\" Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). *5 5 III. Analysis A. Sexual Harassment B. Violation of Public Policy Plaintiff's second cause of action is titled \"Violation of Public Policy.\" She argues that defendants have violated public policy through (1) violating Article 1, Section 8 of the California Constitution and (2) violating the California statutes that underlie her sexual harassment claim. Both arguments are unavailing. First, Article 1, Section 8 of the California provides that \"[a] person may not be disqualified from entering or pursuing a *6 business, profession, vocation or employment because of sex, race, creed, color or national or ethnic origin.\" Claims pursuant to this section \"`may only be brought where a plaintiff has been denied entrance into a profession or particular employment or terminated from the same.'\" Madison v. Motion Picture Set 6 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/13 Painters and Sign Writers Local 729, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1244, 1255 (C.D. Cal. 2000). Because plaintiff's claim has nothing to do with employment, she cannot state a claim under this section. Second, although the California statutes cited by plaintiff,e.g., Cal. Educ. Code \u00a7 66251, may support a cause of action for sexual harassment, there is no reason that violation of those statutes would give rise to a derivative cause of action in tort. Plaintiff has cited no authority (and the court has similarly not found any support) for the proposition that a cause of action for \"violation of public policy\" exists when a teacher harasses a student. Rather, the tort of \"violation of public policy\" is typically recognized in the employment context, where, for example, an employee has been discharged for engaging in socially desirable behavior. Accordingly, the court grants the motion to dismiss the \"Violation of Public Policy\" claim. *7 2 7 2 Furthermore, even if the court were to recognize such a cause of action, it would only apply to defendant Corral, because the Board, as a public entity, enjoys immunity from common law causes of action. Cal. Gov't Code \u00a7 815 (\"Except as otherwise provided by statute public entity is not liable for an injury\"). C. Ratification of Acts of Employee Plaintiff's third cause of action is titled \"Ratification of Acts of Employee\" and is directed against only the Board. Part of this cause of action merely restates the Board's liability for sexual harassment under plaintiff's first cause of action. Part of this cause of action is distinct, however, in that plaintiff argues that the Board had a mandatory duty to provide an environment free from sexual harassment. Compl. \u00b6 41 (\"Defendant Board of Trustees ratified the acts of Defendant Corral by failing to act in a manner which protected the female students of the university.\"). 3 3 For example, plaintiff cites to Cal. Gov't Code \u00a7 815.2(a), which provides that a public entity is liable for injury proximately caused by the act of an employee within the scope of his employment, as support for her \"Ratification\" cause of action. This section, however, merely provides the mechanism for imposing liability on the Board for any sexual 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/13 harassment perpetrated by Corral, and the claim for sexual harassment is already covered by plaintiff's first cause of action. Section 815.6 of the California Government Code provides for mandatory duty claims. There are three elements to mandatory duty claims: (1) the public entity is under a mandatory duty imposed by an enactment; (2) the enactment was \"designed to protect\" against the injury claimed; and (3) the injury was \"proximately caused\" by the public entity's failure to discharge its mandatory duty. Dep't of Corps. v. Sup. Ct., 153 Cal. App. 4th 916, 926 (2007). \"Whether a particular statute is intended to impose a mandatory duty is a question of interpretation for the courts.\"Nunn v. State of California, *8 35 Cal. 3d 616, 624 (1984). 8 The Board argues that \"a litigant seeking to plead the breach of a mandatory duty must specifically allege the applicable statute or regulation,\" which plaintiff has not done.Lehto v. City of Oxnard, 171 Cal. App. 3d 285, 292-93 (1985) (\"Only by doing so may the public entity be advised of the factual and legal basis of the claim against it.\"); Id. at 293 (\"Without this requirement of specificity in pleading, a court would be hard pressed to determine whether the enactment relied upon was intended to impose an obligatory duty . . . or whether it was merely advisory in character.\"). Nevertheless, this is a state pleading requirement, and this court applies federal procedural law to even state law claims. See, e.g., Abdoh v. City of Chicago, 930 F. Supp. 311 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (\"we apply federal pleading standards in assessing the sufficiency of both federal and state claims\"). Here, plaintiff explains that the Board had a mandatory duty imposed by the Sex Equity in Education Act, which provides, in relevant part, that \"California postsecondary educational institutions have an affirmative obligation to combat . . . sexism . . . and a responsibility to provide equal educational opportunity.\" Cal. Educ. Code \u00a7 66252 (\"Legislative Findings and Intent\"). This particular section, however, does not include any implementing guidelines or rules, which is required to establish a mandatory duty claim. See O'Toole v. Superior Court, 140 Cal. App. 4th 488, 510 (2006) (holding that a statute *9 gives rise to a mandatory duty only if the statute affirmatively requires that a particular action be taken and provides implementing guidelines or rules). Moreover, statements of legislative 9 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/13 intent, such as those embodied in section 66252, do not create a mandatory duty. See Shamsian v. Dep't of Conservation, 136 Cal. App. 4th 621, 633 (2006) (\"a statement of legislative intent may not give rise to a mandatory duty\"). Nevertheless, one section of the Sex Equity in Education Act does have implementing guidelines. Section 66281.5 describes, in detail, the affirmative steps that schools must take to provide notification of the prohibition against sexual harassment and the available remedies. E.g., Cal. Educ. Code \u00a7 66281.5(b) (\"Each postsecondary educational institution . . . shall have a written policy on sexual harassment.\"); id. \u00a7 66281.5(c) (\"[The policy] shall include information on where to obtain the specific rules and procedures for reporting charges of sexual harassment\"); id. \u00a7 66281.5(d copy of the [policy] shall be displayed in a prominent location.\"). Of particular relevance to this case, the section provides that a copy of the written sexual harassment policy \"shall be provided for each faculty member . . . at the beginning of the . . . school year.\" Id. \u00a7 66281.5(f). That said, the court has no knowledge of whether defendant Corral received a copy of the school's sexual harassment policy or whether there is any disagreement between the parties as to this issue. At present, the complaint simply reads: \"Defendant *10 Board of Trustees ratified the acts of Defendant Corral by failing to act in a manner which protected the female students of the university.\" Compl. \u00b6 41. There are no factual allegations to support this statement. To the extent that plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint to state a claim pursuant to section 66281.5, she is granted leave to do so. 10 Accordingly, the motion to dismiss plaintiff's third cause of action is granted. D. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The elements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim are \"`(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/13 defendant's outrageous conduct.'\" Davidson v. City of Westminster, 32 Cal. 3d 197, 209 (1982). \"Extreme and outrageous conduct\" is conduct that is so extreme that it goes beyond all possible bounds of decency tolerated in a civilized community. Id. at 209. Here, taking plaintiff's allegations as true, it is a jury question as to whether Corral engaged in conduct that would constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct. Plaintiff alleges that on two *11 occasions Corral discussed sexual matters with her and hugged and kissed her; that he invited her out to dinner once with her friend; that he once told her that he was watching her while walking up behind her; and that he constantly stared at her breasts. It is important, however, to view the conduct in light of the position of the parties, which provided defendant Corral with power over plaintiff's grade and perhaps her future. Whether all of the above is sufficient is a question for the jury, which serves as an arbiter of society's norms. 4 11 4 Plaintiff alleges that the Board is also liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress pursuant to the statute permitting suit against public entities for negligently discharging mandatory duties. Cal. Gov't Code \u00a7 815.6. In addition to the defects associated with this claim noted above, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a common law tort from which public entities enjoy immunity. Cal. Gov't Code \u00a7 815(a). Although plaintiff attempts to rely on the Sex Equity in Education Act as a statutory basis for her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, that statute deals only with discrimination and harassment, not some generalized notion of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant Corral also argues that plaintiff has not alleged severe emotional distress, given that she chose to take a class with him and accepted his dinner invitation after he had already allegedly hugged and kissed her in November 2005. As noted above, however, plaintiff alleges that she was required to take the class for her degree, and she alleges that she only accepted the dinner invitation to address his previous conduct. Compl. \u00b6 19. These acts do not therefore negate the possibility that plaintiff in fact suffered severe emotional distress. 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/13 Accordingly, the court denies the motion to dismiss as to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. *12 12 E. Title Plaintiff also brings a claim under Title IX, which provides that \"no person . . . shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.\" 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a). Title is enforceable through an implied private right of action. Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (1979). Because school officials may not be sued in their individual capacity as they are not grant recipients, Kinman v. Omaha Pub. Sch. Dist., 171 F.3d 607, 611 (8th Cir. 1999), the court construes plaintiff's Title claim as directed only against the Board.5 5 Although the Board is an arm of the state for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment, it is not immune from suit in federal court. Congress expressly abrogated state sovereign immunity for suits under Title in accordance with its powers under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000d-7 State shall not be immune under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States from suit in Federal court for a violation of . . . title IX\"); Franks v. Kentucky Sch. for the Deaf, 142 F.3d 360 (6th Cir. 1998) (upholding Title abrogation as constitutional exercise of Congress' powers under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment). Sexual harassment is a form of discrimination based on sex and is actionable under Title IX. Franklin v. Gwinett County Pub. Schs., 503 U.S. 60, 75 (1992). In order to prevail on her claim, plaintiff must show that a school official with the authority to take corrective action had \"actual notice\" of the harassment \u2014 rather than merely constructive notice \u2014 and *13 responded with deliberate indifference. Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent Sch. Dist., 524 U.S. 274, 285-90 (1998). The reason for the actual notice requirement is said to be because Title does not aim to prohibit discrimination outright, per se, but simply prevents the use of federal funds to carry out discrimination; accordingly, if that discrimination can be remedied by school officials, that is a preferable outcome to the termination of funds, or, in the case of a private action, a damages award. Id. at 288. 13 6 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/13 6 Moreover, the high court has said that because Title creates only an implied right of action, \"[i]t would be unsound . . . for a statute's express system of enforcement to require notice to the recipient and an opportunity to come into voluntary compliance while a judicially implied system of enforcement permits substantial liability without regard to the recipient's knowledge or its corrective actions upon receiving notice.\"Gebser, 524 U.S. at 289. Here, plaintiff does not claim that she ever reported her own alleged harassment to any official. Nevertheless, she maintains that \"had prior knowledge that Defendant Corral had a propensity to make sexual advances toward university female students.\" Compl. \u00b6 40. In other words, plaintiff appears to allege that other female students complained of Corral's behavior to officials, and that school officials therefore had \"actual notice\" of his allegedly harassing behavior. There is no definitive guidance on whether a plaintiff's duty to demonstrate actual notice on the part of a school official may be satisfied by complaints by other students of *14 harassing behavior. Stated differently, plaintiff's position is that a knowledge of a substantial risk of abuse is sufficient to show actual knowledge. This is an issue that the Ninth Circuit has yet to rule upon, and it has divided other courts. Compare Johnson v. Galen Health Institutes, Inc., 267 F. Supp. 2d 679, 688 (W.D. Ky. 2003) (\"[T]he actual notice standard is met when an appropriate official has actual knowledge of a substantial risk of abuse to students based on prior complaints by other students.\"), Doe A. v. Green, 298 F. Supp. 2d 1025, 1033-34 (D. Nev. 2004) (approving of substantial risk standard), Gordon ex rel. Gordon v. Ottumwa Community School Dist., 115 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1082 (S.D. Iowa 2000) (same), Massey v. Akron City Bd. of Educ., 82 F. Supp. 2d 735, 745 (N.D. Ohio 2000) (complaints made by those other than plaintiff can establish actual notice), and Doe v. School Administrative Dist. No. 19, 66 F. Supp. 2d 57, 63-64 (D. Me. 1999) (actual notice present where there were reports that teacher had sexual relations with a student other than plaintiff) with Bayard v. Malone, 268 F.3d 228, 238 (4th Cir. 2001) (knowledge of potential for abuse not sufficient to establish actual notice). 14 7 7 See also Escue v. Northern College, 450 F.3d 1146, 1153-54 (10th Cir. 2006) (acknowledging but not resolving disagreement over whether notice 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/13 may consist of prior complaint or must consist of notice regarding current harassment); Grandson v. University of Minnesota, 272 F.3d 568, 575-76 (8th Cir. 2001) (finding that complaints received over several years regarding the level of sports funding were not sufficient to show actual notice where complaints were simply part of public debate). The majority rule that seems to have emerged from these *15 cases is that \"actual notice requires more than a simple report of inappropriate conduct by a teacher\" but \"does not set the bar so high that a school district is not put on notice until it receives a clearly credible report of sexual abuse from the plaintiff-student.\" Doe, 66 F. Supp. 2d at 63; accord Reese v. Jefferson School Dist. No. 14J, 208 F.3d 736, 740 (9th Cir. 2000) (one alleged instance of student-on-student harassment was not enough to put school district on actual notice of worse and ongoing harassment). \"[T]he institution must have possessed enough knowledge of the harassment that it reasonably could have responded with remedial measures to address the kind of harassment upon which plaintiff's legal claim is based.\" Crandell v. New York College of Osteopathic Med., 87 F. Supp. 2d 304, 320 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). 15 The advantage of this rule is that it prevents schools from escaping liability where officials knew that a teacher was engaging in behavior that raised warning flags \u2014 even to the point where there was a substantial certainty that harassment was occurring \u2014 so long as they did not know of harassment toward a particular student. The disadvantage of this rule is that it prevents narrowly tailored remedial responses. For instance, under the facts of this case, given that plaintiff alleges that she had to take a subsequent class with Corral necessary for her degree, the school could have arranged an alternative (such as offering the class from another instructor narrow remedy may be much preferable to a broad *16 one (such as firing the teacher, or prohibiting all student contact) where there has not been a serious or credible history of complaints. 16 Nevertheless, preventing discrimination where a school has sufficient information to take remedial measures is the paramount concern. Accordingly, the court adopts the majority rule that knowledge of a substantial risk of harassment is sufficient to place a school on actual notice. Here, plaintiff alleges that other students complained of harassment by Corral. If these complaints were sufficiently numerous, severe, or close in 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/13 time to the instances of discrimination that she alleged \u2014 all of which are factual issues \u2014 actual notice may exist. The Board also argues that, even if actual notice were present, plaintiff has failed to sufficiently plead facts to show that defendant was deliberately indifferent. Gebser, 524 U.S. at 290 (both actual notice and deliberate indifference required for Title claim). The nature of this element, however, is the absence of action; accordingly, the court finds that deliberate indifference has been adequately pled. The court denies the motion with respect to plaintiff's Title claim. IV. Conclusion For the reasons explained above, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, with 20 days leave to amend ORDERED. *1 1 About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/13 Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:18 Aguilar v. Corral, NO. CIV. S-07-1601 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/13"} |
8,941 | David Swim | California State University - Sacramento | [
"8941_101.pdf",
"8941_102.pdf",
"8941_101.pdf",
"8941_102.pdf"
] | {"8941_101.pdf": "", "8941_102.pdf": "Date(s) of Incident Complainant Status Respondent Name Respondent Position Incident Description Outcome 8-Sep-17 Student Ted Kidwell Piano Technician Sexual harassment (inappropriate comments regarding Complainant's gender) Counseling memo. 14-Sep-17 Staff Ted Kidwell Piano Technician Retaliation (Respondent retaliated in response to Complainants' complaint) Counseling memo. 20-Sep-17 Student Michael Bolliger Assistant Track & Field Coach Sexual harassment (inappropriate sexual comments to student-athlete) Letter of reprimand. 2016-2017 Student Lance Brewer Custodian Sexual harassment (inappropriate sexual comments to student) Respondent voluntarily resigned prior to the conclusion of the investigation. 2016 Staff Summer Wilson Music Dept Sexual harassment (unwanted comments of a sexual nature) and stalking Respondent voluntarily resigned prior to the conclusion of the investigation. Fall 2015 Student Eugene Dammel Faculty Gender discrimination based on Respondent's in/out of class comments that caused Complainant to stop attending class. Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, one- semester suspension without pay and various training courses. Spring 2016 Student Tyehimba Kokayi Faculty Sexual misconduct (nonconsensual touching), sexual harassment, race harassment Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, Respondent voluntarily resigned and agreed not to seek future employment with the campuses. Spring 2016 Student Tyehimba Kokayi Faculty Sexual misconduct (nonconsensual touching), sexual harassment, race harassment Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, Respondent voluntarily resigned and agreed not to seek future employment with the campuses. Spring 2016 Student Kieuchinh \"KC\" Tran Faculty Disability discrimination (failure to accommodate) Verbal counseling. Date(s) of Incident Complainant Status Respondent Name Respondent Position Incident Description Outcome Fall 2018 Student Melissa McTernan Faculty Violation of the Consentual Relationship policy under 1097 Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, suspension without pay from 11/15/19 to 5/20/2020. Respondent voluntarily resigned while serving suspension. Spring 2019 Student Daniel Amare Faculty Sexual harassment (unwelcomed advances) After Respondent's appointment ended, Respondent was not reappointed as a lecturer Fall 2019 Student Marc Foster Faculty Sexual harassment (unwanted comments of a sexual nature) and stalking After Respondent's appointment ended, Respondent was not reappointed as a lecturer Fall 2019 Student Marc Foster Faculty Sexual harassment (unwanted comments of a sexual nature) and retaliation. After Respondent's appointment ended, Respondent was not reappointed as a lecturer Spring 2019 Faculty David Swim Faculty Sexual harassment (unwanted comments of a sexual nature) Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, Respondent voluntarily resigned on 9/30/20. Fall 2018 Faculty David Swim Faculty Sexual harassment (unwanted comments of a sexual nature) Pursuant to Settlement Agreement, Respondent voluntarily resigned on 9/30/20."} |
7,691 | Bradley Garner | University of Cincinnati | [
"7691_101.pdf",
"7691_102.pdf",
"7691_103.pdf",
"7691_104.pdf",
"7691_105.pdf",
"7691_106.pdf",
"7691_107.pdf"
] | {"7691_101.pdf": "Why University of Cincinnati professor accused of sexual harassment wasn't fired Terry DeMio and Kate Murphy Cincinnati Enquirer Published 10:02 p.m Feb. 6, 2018 Updated 7:01 p.m Feb. 7, 2018 He should have been fired for accusations of sexual misconduct with students, his boss said. But he was never fired. He was never exonerated. He left. And according to his attorney, former University of Cincinnati professor Bradley Garner still teaches, worldwide. More: Flute students accuse ex-University of Cincinnati professor of 2 decades of sexual misconduct How could this be? The tenured flute professor retired Dec. 7 \u2013 almost 10 months after the administration recommended his dismissal. That was 14 months after the school first launched its investigation into accusations of \"repeated and systemic sexual harassment\" made by two of Garner's former students. In his retirement letter, Garner denied the charges and said he hadn't been treated fairly by UC's legal team. Here's how the process went, according to records obtained by The Enquirer notified Garner on Oct. 6, 2016, that complaints alleging he was creating \"a sexually hostile environment\" had been lodged against him. He was immediately suspended with pay, and the administration began its investigation. On Nov. 23, 2016, the university completed its investigation and issued preliminary findings of the sexual harassment claims based on interviews with 21 students, faculty and staff. On Jan. 25, 2017, Garner's attorney, Subodh Chandra, sent a letter to stating that the university had not given Garner \"due process to respond to the serious allegations lodged against him.\" That was followed by another letter on Feb. 21, 2017, singling out the university 2/22/25, 10:19 Sexual harassment: Why accused University of Cincinnati professor wasn't fired 1/3 for \"abysmal shortcomings\" in Garner's treatment during the investigation. Because Chandra couldn't attend the official interview between investigators and Garner, he included a sworn affidavit with Garner's responses to the claims. On Feb. 24, 2017, the university issued its finding that Garner's \"actions are adequate cause for dismissal.\" It outlined accusations of professional misconduct, sexual harassment and Title violations. It noted he had a right to challenge the findings with the chapter of the American Association of University Professors, the faculty union. Garner decided to take that route. On May 10, the university administration sent Garner a letter concurring that the issue would go to mediation on June 6. It's unclear what happened during mediation, but the two sides did not come to an agreement. And that's what led to the next phase, in which a panel of faculty members, administrators and academic unit heads was selected to hear the grievance. Finally, a hearing date was set for Dec. 14, 2017. Chandra, Garner's attorney, said he couldn't make it because he had to be in federal court. He proposed the next day, but did not budge week before the scheduled hearing, Garner submitted his letter announcing his retirement from \"for personal reasons.\" He said he'd been denied due process to respond to the allegations, which he again stated were false. University spokesman Greg Vehr said the process worked \"as it should.\" Some former students were outraged that Garner could just walk away, but the university administration and the union stand by their procedures. Eric Palmer, executive director of the chapter of the AAUP, would not comment specifically on the Garner case. But he noted that, if a faculty member leaves the university before the end of a union grievance procedure, there is nothing more that the union can do. \"If a case never went to the grievance hearing and an individual was no longer employed by the university, that person is not covered by the collective bargaining agreement,\" Palmer said. \"They literally could not go through and finish.\" And that's what happened with Garner. 2/22/25, 10:19 Sexual harassment: Why accused University of Cincinnati professor wasn't fired 2/3 The 61-year-old Newtown, Ohio, resident declined an interview with The Enquirer, but Garner's attorney spoke on his behalf have never seen a more kangaroo proceeding,\u201d Chandra said. \"The complainants and witnesses were under no legal obligation to tell the truth. Similarly, the university\u2019s investigator was under no legal obligation to seek out the truth.\u201d Several faculty members who had a connection with Garner did not return calls requesting comment for this story spokeswoman for the AAUP's national organization did not respond to emailed questions about the grievance process at and what occurred with Garner's case. But this type of situation, where a professor is able to teach elsewhere with no one knowing of findings of a sexual harassment case at a previous university, irks U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier, D- California. \u201cThis is yet another example of professors sexually assaulting or harassing their students and employees with few repercussions,\" Speier said in a statement to The Enquirer. \"It is a no- brainer that universities should not employ faculty who abuse their students.\" She plans to reintroduce legislation this summer that would hold colleges and universities accountable for sexual assault and harassment by professors. Speier's bill, the Federal Funding Accountability for Sexual Harassers Act, would require all such substantiated findings to be reported to every federal agency that has awarded the institution competitive research and development grants in the past 10 years. Editor's note: This article has been updated to note that Eric Palmer is the executive director of the chapter of the AAUP. It has also been updated to remove information University of Cincinnati says is inaccurate regarding Bradley Garner's personnel file. 2/22/25, 10:19 Sexual harassment: Why accused University of Cincinnati professor wasn't fired 3/3", "7691_102.pdf": "professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light Local February 21, 2018 \uf086 1 Comments Editor\u2019s Note: The Xavier Newswire uses the word \u201calleged\u201d and subsequent variations to avoid casting doubt or blame on either party involved in the following scenario. The word does not absolve or incriminate either party\u2019s statements and is merely used to avoid bias towards either party. Photo courtesy of Meg Vogel | After having his alleged sexual misconduct an \u201copen secret\u201d among faculty in University of Cincinnati\u2019s music department since the 1990\u2019s, flautist Bradley Garner had his actions brought to light by the Enquirer. The sexual assault scandal involving former University of Cincinnati (UC) flute professor and world-renowned performer Dr. Bradley Garner was brought to public attention earlier this month by the Cincinnati Enquirer. After the release of an investigative report by that included the testimony of 21 former, current and prospective students in November, the university placed Garner on unpaid leave and barred him from campus. Garner retired seven days before his disciplinary hearing in December 2017, claiming he had been denied Home professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light Xavier Newswire Delivering Xavier's News since 1915. \uf103 \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 1/6 due process in the Title proceedings. No alleged sexual assault victims have identified themselves publicly began its investigation into Garner in October after a College-Conservatory of Music (CCM) division head and dean escorted two unidentified flute students to UC\u2019s Title office to file complaints against Garner, according to the Enquirer. The investigative report released in November concluded that there was evidence that Garner\u2019s \u201cpersistent and pervasive harassment created a significant hostile learning environment for students\u201d via \u201cunwanted sexual advances and verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature has claimed that it did not receive complaints prior to October 2016, though the Enquirer interviewed a graduate student who claimed she filed Title complaints in spring of 2016. Former adjunct professor Randy Bowman also claimed that Garner\u2019s inappropriate behavior had been an \u201copen secret\u201d among staff since the 1990s. UC\u2019s investigative report found that Garner targeted students in three main ways within CCM: sexualizing students, texting them sexually explicit messages and having sexual relations with them. He also made objectifying comments during private and group lessons to female students. The comments included, \u201cWould you like your spanking now or later?\u201d and want you to breathe so low that the bottom of your pants pops open promise won\u2019t look\u2026 but maybe will students and a professor claimed they had occasionally received or heard of students receiving sexually explicit texts including genitalia from Garner. The investigative report included one student\u2019s testimony claiming that Garner kissed them on the face during private lessons. Garner even had students sign legally binding contracts to only be taught private lessons by him, according to the Enquirer. Prospective students detail instances that Garner had forced sexual relations when they were minors. Bowman claimed that Garner showed him two videos of the flute professor having sexual relations with students. Besides UC, Garner was instructing at three other institutions: NYU, Juilliard Pre-college Division (Juilliard Prep) and WildAcres Flute Retreat did not attempt to inform any of these institutions of the investigation after it released the report in November. Juilliard Prep had informally known of the investigation through the flute world and placed the famed flutist on immediate leave in December, allowing Garner\u2019s contract to expire \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 2/6 without renewal. New York University fired Garner after being approached by the Enquirer in January. Wildacres Flute Retreat has also fired Garner. Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters will be working with to examine the sexual assault allegations further. By: Heather Gast ~Staff Writer~ Local News Local \uf073 February 18, 2025 \uf06e 110 views Cincinnati Spotlight: Arthur\u2019s Attracts Craving Customers #Heather Gast Campus responds to Florida shooting \uf104 Police Notes & Week in Review \u2013 2/21/2018 \uf105 Related Posts \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 3/6 By Christian Cullen, Staff Writer Arthur\u2019s is a cozy little burger spot located a short seven- minute drive away from Xavier in Hyde Park. It has a homely atmosphere with lighting\u2026 Local News Local \uf073 February 18, 2025 \uf06e 120 views Law Enforcement React to Neo- Nazi Activities By William Coffman, Opinions and Editorials Editor Residents in Evendale and Lincoln Heights are still searching for answers after a group of neo- Nazis gathered earlier this month on Feb 7,\u2026 One thought on professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light\u201d \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 4/6 Comments are closed. Kim McFarland says: 27 Feb 2018 at 3:00 pm The Wildacres Flute Retreat suspended its association with Mr. Garner over a week before the publication of this article. Loading... \uf061 Cincinnati Spotlight: Arthur\u2019s Attracts Craving Customers Vance's Politics Conflict with His Faith Says Hello From Annual Conference in Chicago \uf061 Law Enforcement React to Neo-Nazi Activities \uf061 xHamster helps with sex education \uf061 \uf061 \uf061 \uf061 \uf061 2024-2025 Staff Editor-in-Chief: Katie Sanchez Managing Editor: Spencer de Tenley Campus News Editor: Clare McKinley Top Stories \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 5/6 Copyright \u00a9 2025 Xavier Newswire | Powered by Desert Themes \uf39e \uf16d \ue61b \uf167 Local News Editor: Luca Filigenzi Opinions & Editorials Editor: William Coffman Sports Editor: Addison Burke Arts & Entertainment Editor: Audrey Elwood The Back Page Editor: Ben Dickison Head Copy Editor: Tess Dankoski Photography Manager: Daniel Betz Digital Communication Manager: Hannah Wolke Advertising Manager: Hailey Lemire \uf148 2/22/25, 10:19 professor\u2019s misconduct brought to light \u2013 Xavier Newswire 6/6", "7691_103.pdf": "Schools Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment The renown flutist Bradley Garner was accused by at least 11 women of inappropriate kissing and touching and sexual harassment. Ciara McCarthy, Patch Staff Posted Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 pm \uf0cfSign up West Village \uf01eSubscribe News Feed Events Local Businesses Classifieds 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 1/7 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 2/7 \u2014 New York University fired a flute professor this month after a news report detailed accounts from nearly a dozen women who said the professor inappropriately touched or sexually harassed them. The professor in question, Bradley Garner, was one of the world\u2019s most renown flutists. In addition to NYU, he has taught at the University of Cincinnati and at Juilliard. Garner has taught as an adjunct professor at since 1999, according to his resume. Find out what's happening in West Villagefor free with the latest updates from Patch. Your email address was unaware of allegations surrounding Bradley Garner until we recently received an inquiry from a Cincinnati Enquirer reporter,\" the school said in a statement. \"As of February 7, Mr. Garner is no longer an adjunct faculty member at NYU. Providing our students with a safe space to learn is our priority, and sexual misconduct of any kind is not tolerated Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 3/7 Garner primarily worked at the University of Cincinnati, where he resigned in December in the middle of an investigation into his conduct. On Wednesday, the Cincinnati Enquirer published an investigation detailing accusations from 11 women who said the powerful professor had kissed, touched or sexually harassed them over the course of the previous two decades. The Enquirer reported that the University of Cincinnati, where Garner taught at the College-Conservatory of Music, began investigating complaints against Garner in 2016 report into his conduct found evidence of \"unwanted sexual advances and verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature,\" a \"hostile environment\" and conduct that was \"severe, persistent or pervasive,\" according to the Enquirer's investigation. Another professor told the Enquirer that Garner secretly filmed himself having sex with two students. Garner later showed the illicit videos to the professor 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 4/7 One student told investigators Garner said during a breathing demonstration want you to breathe so low that the bottom of your pants pops open promise won\u2019t look \u2026 but maybe will,\" the Enquirer reported. Another student told investigators about Garner \"smacking (her) on the butt\" when she bent over to pick up her flute before asking her to \"bend over again,\" the newspaper reported. Garner has denied all of the accusations through an attorney. The day after the Cincinnati Enquirer published its investigation announced taht Garner was no longer teaching at the University. Image credit: Ciara McCarthy / Patch Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts. Share More from West Village \uf0c2 \uf045 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 5/7 Latest News Nearby 1. \uf02bQueens News Suspect Sucker Punched Mom In Station, Police Say 2. \uf02bNew York City News Restaurants Ordered Closed Febuary 14 - 21 3. \uf02bBrooklyn News Woman Killed In Brooklyn Apartment Fire 4. \uf02bNew York City News Luigi Mangione Appears In Court For State Case 5. \uf02bNew York City News Judge Says He Will Decide Soon Whether To Dismiss Mayor Adams Case Best of West Village West Village | Restaurants & Bars How Workers Call The Shots At This West Village Bar 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 6/7 Find out what\u2019s happening in your community on the Patch app Corporate Info About Patch Careers Partnerships Advertise on Patch Support FAQs Contact Patch Community Guidelines Posting Instructions Terms of Use Privacy Policy \u00a9 2025 Patch Media. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Sell My Personal Information \uf058 \uf01e\uf058 \uf021\uf058\uf058 \uf0b2\uf058 \uf0b1 2/22/25, 10:19 Drops Flute Prof After 11 Women Accuse Him Of Harassment | West Village Patch 7/7", "7691_104.pdf": "\uf0e72 weather alerts \uf5491 closing/delay \uf002 \uf26c Watch Now Quick links Prosecutor calls University of Cincinnati flute professor 'a pig' but can't file charges UC: Investigation found cases of sexual harassment \uf09a\ue61b\uf0e0 Menu 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 1/8 By Staff Posted 3:07 PM, Feb 28, 2018 and last updated 11:13 PM, Mar 01, 2018 -- Prosecutor Joe Deters called former University of Cincinnati flute professor Bradley Garner \"a pig\" for preying on female students. Although Deters admitted prosecutors don't have enough evidence to file criminal charges against Garner at this time, they're not giving up hate to be blunt about this, but the guy is just a pig,\" Deters said at a Thursday news conference. \"To prey on your students in this fashion is unconscionable.\" Deters said he hopes other victims will come forward to help prosecutors send him to jail. undefined undefined 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 2/8 Witnesses complained of sexual harassment by Garner going back 20 years, Deters said after his office reviewed the results of a investigation into complaints against Garner. Deters said the investigation covered \"seven or eight allegations\" from the past 10 years. Garner left the College Conservatory of Music last year after the investigation determined he engaged in \"persistent and pervasive harassment\" of students said its investigation documented unwanted sexual advances and inappropriate comments and text messages by interviewing more than a dozen current, former and prospective students. An adjunct professor told investigators that Garner showed him a video he secretly recorded of himself having sex with two students. Deters said they are still looking into a complaint of activity that took place in South Carolina that could result in criminal charges there. But Deters also said he's sure Garner had more victims. Read More 00:00 02:00 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 3/8 \"People who do this don't do it a few times, they're doing it all the time,\" Deters said. \"There were couple of cases where we have not identified people involved, but they were videotaped with him. Hopefully, they'll come forward.\" Deters said consensual sex between Garner and his adult students was legal but he condemned Garner for abusing the power he had over them. Deters said an Ohio law that makes it illegal for high school teachers to have sex with any student - adult or minor - doesn't apply to college professors. \"These were not minors that we know of,\" Deters said of Garner's victims. I-TEAM: Standing up to sexual harassment: 'Even strong cases are difficult to win' Deters said started looking into Garner because students stopped signing up for his classes \"because of his reputation.\" Deters said Garner's victims tended to be women \"of Asian descent.\" Deters speculated that Garner found them to be susceptible and thought they wouldn't report him the news release from Deters' office here or below. \"Quite frankly, I'd like to see him go to jail. But right now we can't do it. We don't have the case,\" Deters said. \"I've been doing this job for a long time and know it's not six (victims) or seven or eight - it's a lot of girls,\" Deters said hope that in the current environment we live in today they will have the courage and strength - and we will provide as much support as we can for them - to come forward and tell us what happened.\" 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 4/8 In an affidavit, Garner denied the allegations and criticized UC's probe. \"What should have been a simple investigation into false statements by two students instead turned into a wide-ranging, rumor-seeking, undisciplined witch hunt,\" Garner said. \"The allegations lodged against me are false. Unfortunately, the report is filled with salacious rumors and rank hearsay.\" Copyright 2018 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign up for the Breaking News Newsletter and receive up to date information. Prosecutor announces no criminal charges against Bradley Garner contributed by Greg Noble (WCPO) p. 1 File Search Sections Fit width Page 1 of 1 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 5/8 E-mail Submit What's New for the Luxury Townhouse Market? Insights Here Paid Content: Mansion Global 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 6/8 Perspective: Advancing Neurological Disorder Research With Neurofilament Light as a Biomarker Paid Content: GenomeWeb The team that helps you save so you Don't Waste Your 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 7/8 Traffic News Money Sports Entertainment Life Marketplace Support Sitemap Do Not Sell My Info Privacy Policy Privacy Center Journalism Ethics Guidelines Corrections Policy Terms of Use Careers Public Files Application Public File Contact Accessibility Statement Scripps Media Trust Center Closed Captioning Contact \uf09a\uf16d\ue61b\ue07b Scripps Local Media \u00a9 2025 Scripps Media, Inc Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way Money 2/22/25, 10:19 Prosecutor: Prof is a 'pig' but won't be charged 8/8", "7691_105.pdf": "(AP) \u2014 An Ohio prosecutor is looking into allegations against a flute instructor who was the subject of a University of Cincinnati sexual harassment investigation. The Cincinnati Enquirer reported earlier this week that the school\u2019s investigation into complaints in 2016 against then-professor Bradley Garner found evidence of \u201cpervasive\u201d misconduct, including \u201cunwanted sexual advances and verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature\u201d back to the 1990s. Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters (DEE'-turs) told The Enquirer that the university has been cooperative as he seeks to \u201cexamine what they have\u201d before deciding whether to pursue a case. The College-Conservatory Of Music\u2019s interim dean recommended firing Garner, but the 61-year-old star flutist remained until his December retirement. He denied the accusations in a sworn affidavit, calling the school\u2019s investigation a \u201crumor-seeking, undisciplined witch hunt.\u201d ___ Information from: The Cincinnati Enquirer, Ohio prosecutor looking into allegations against instructor Updated 8:50 CST, February 9, 2018 Maine governor Frozen shakes recall Postal Service Virginia Beach shooting Jerry Butler dies 2/22/25, 10:20 Ohio prosecutor looking into allegations against instructor News 1/3 Steve Bannon is accused of doing a straight-arm Nazi salute at but says it was just \u2018a wave\u2019 Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio arrested near Capitol on assault charge after press conference Trump administration reverses its previous decision and reinstates legal aid for migrant children Dow falls nearly 750 points and stocks tumble as businesses and consumers worry about tariffs 1 2 3 4 2/22/25, 10:20 Ohio prosecutor looking into allegations against instructor News 2/3 Trump spars with Maine\u2019s governor at the White House over transgender athletes 5 2/22/25, 10:20 Ohio prosecutor looking into allegations against instructor News 3/3", "7691_106.pdf": "Deters calls ex flute professor 'a pig,' but no criminal charges Kate Murphy and Dan Horn Cincinnati Enquirer Published 1:04 p.m March 1, 2018 Updated 4:57 p.m March 1, 2018 Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said no criminal charges will be filed at this time against Bradley Garner, a former University of Cincinnati flute professor accused of sexual misconduct with students that spanned two decades. Though his investigation found nothing he could take to a grand jury, Deters described Garner as a predator who violated the trust of his students and the university. \"The guy is just a pig,\" he said. \"To prey on your students in this fashion is unconscionable.\" Deters' office spent three weeks looking into the matter after The Enquirer reported Feb. 6 that Garner subjected multiple female students to \"unwanted sexual advances and verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature\" in a manner that was \"severe, persistent or pervasive.\" Nine women told university investigators that Garner kissed them, touched them inappropriately or said inappropriate things to them former adjunct professor also told investigators he witnessed Garner\u2019s sexual misconduct with students, including videos of Garner having sexual relations with two students. Garner denied the allegations to the investigators \u2013 a denial his attorney, Subodh Chandra, repeated to The Enquirer for the original story. Chandra did not respond to a request for comment Thursday. Deters said his office investigated seven or eight allegations going back a decade. He said the women involved all were adults, but he questioned whether they could reasonably give consent when Garner had so much power over them and their careers. \"Is it really consensual when this guy is controlling your life?\" Deters said. \"To use that position to force them into these situations is horrible. I'd like to see him go to jail.\" 2/22/25, 10:20 Sexual harassment: No criminal charges against ex-professor for now, prosecutor says 1/4 He said he is referring one case, involving a woman who was a juvenile at the time, to authorities in South Carolina, where that incident occurred. He said that case involved allegations of physical force. Deters said he believes Garner's misconduct involved more women, and he invited anyone who believes they were mistreated to contact the university. \"If they do that, there could be criminal charges involved,\" Deters said know there are other girls out there. People don't do this a few times. \"If we had a case, he'd be sitting in the Justice Center right now.\" PREVIOUSLY: Flute students accuse ex-University of Cincinnati professor of sexual misconduct over 2 decades RELATED: Yamaha drop ex professor Bradley Garner after sexual harassment investigation ALSO: Student accuser: University of Cincinnati flute professor 'held the keys to my future EDITOR: Why and how Enquirer is writing about sexual harassment At the press conference spokesman Greg Vehr thanked Deters for his efforts. \u201cIt underscores the importance of the issue,\u201d Vehr said. \u201cIt mirrors the university\u2019s own action to safeguard our students.\u201d When UC's Title Office learned of the allegations, Garner was banned the next day from all campuses and from interacting with students, Vehr noted. The Title officials consulted with police, but none of the individuals involved in the investigation wanted to pursue criminal charges, he said previously. So, UC's Title Office continued an independent investigation, which resulted in a recommendation from the College-Conservatory of Music's interim dean that Garner be fired. And the university began dismissal proceedings. Garner no longer works at UC. However, instead of being fired, Garner retired. \"The university\u2019s processes worked as they should,\" Vehr said. \"We strongly encourage all members of the campus community to report concerns to our Title Office.\" 2/22/25, 10:20 Sexual harassment: No criminal charges against ex-professor for now, prosecutor says 2/4 President Neville Pinto and other top administrators have not commented to The Enquirer about the Garner case and the many questions it has raised about how such misconduct could have persisted undetected and unaddressed for so many years. However, Pinto sent a campuswide email on the eve of Deters' press conference and 22 days after The Enquirer published the first story: \"The #MeToo movement has grimly and justifiably reminded us that no workplace, no professional field, no learning environment and no community is immune to sexual assault, sexual harassment and sexual misconduct. That includes the University of Cincinnati.\" He urged members of the community to speak up if they see or know something. Deters referenced the #MeToo movement and said he hoped women who believe Garner harassed or assaulted them will have \"the courage and strength to come forward and tell us what happened.\" Garner, a world-renowned flute professor and performer, was also accused of sexually harassing students \u2013 some minors \u2013 at other institutions. The Juilliard School, where Garner taught for more than three decades, said it was reviewing UC's findings in February. Individuals interviewed by said former professor Bradley Garner behaved inappropriately with students at Juilliard Pre-College, a weekly program for 8- to 18-year-olds. However, Juilliard only learned its students might have been subject to sexual misconduct when an Enquirer reporter emailed the 15-month-old report to spokeswoman Alexandra Day, Day said. Juilliard could not be reached Thursday regarding the status of that review by its Title Office, which investigates allegations of sexual misconduct that violate school policy and state and federal law. Since The Enquirer's report published, New York University, Wildacres Flute Retreat and Yamaha, the musical instrument company, have cut ties with Garner said it was unaware of the allegations against Garner until The Enquirer's report. The school has not said whether it is investigating any allegations involving its students. Wildacres Flute Retreat, located in McDowell County, North Carolina, initially defended Garner but removed him from its faculty after public pressure. 2/22/25, 10:20 Sexual harassment: No criminal charges against ex-professor for now, prosecutor says 3/4 The McDowell County Sheriff's Office told The Enquirer on Thursday that it had not heard of the case but is now looking into whether any criminal complaints have been filed against Garner there. 2/22/25, 10:20 Sexual harassment: No criminal charges against ex-professor for now, prosecutor says 4/4", "7691_107.pdf": "27\u00b0 Cincinnati Flood Warning Is In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 Watch Video FOX19 Now Apps (FOX19) - Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said no charges have been filed against a University of Cincinnati flute instructor who was accused of sexual misconduct. Bradley Garner retired amidst the harassment investigation. Our media partners at the Cincinnati Enquirer reported last month that the school's investigation into complaints in 2016 against then-professor Garner found evidence of \"pervasive\" misconduct, including \"unwanted sexual advances and verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature\" going back years. Deters said his office reviewed the allegations, but said at this time they cannot pursue a criminal case. \"I'd like to see him go to jail, but right now we can't do it. In Ohio, if a high school student is molested or in activity with a teacher... that is a crime. There is no similar crime for a college professor,\" Deters said. \"It was generally consensual, but you know, was is it really consensual when he's controlling your life?\" Deters is urging anyone who was a victim to come forward so they can assess the cases to determine if criminal charges could be involved. Prosecutor flute instructor was \u2018a pig\u2019 who preyed on female students Updated: Mar. 1, 2018 at 1:30 2/22/25, 10:20 Prosecutor flute instructor was \u2018a pig\u2019 who preyed on female students 1/4 \"Some victims have not been identified. They were videotaped with him know there are other girls out there and would urge them to come forward to the university and report this behavior,\" he said. Deters said the allegations that were looked at go back about 10 years, but said witnesses have claimed it has been going on for 20. \"We've looked at seven or eight allegations. People don't do this a few times. They're doing it all the time,\" he said. Deters also said they are still looking into a complaint in South Carolina \"that could result in criminal charges.\" Anyone with information about Garner is asked to contact Karla Phillips, Interim Title Coordinator at at 513-556-3349 or [email protected]@uc.edu. UC's College-Conservatory Of Music's interim dean recommended firing Garner, but the star flutist remained until his December retirement. He denied the accusations in a sworn statement and called UC's investigation a \"rumor-seeking, undisciplined witch hunt.\" Copyright 2018 WXIX. All rights reserved. Packaging Machines | Search Ads | Sponsored Amusement Park Equipment | search ads | Sponsored Tips and Tricks | Sponsored Top Packaging Trends In 2024 (Take Look) Search Now The Cost Of Amusement Park Equipment From Mexico Might Surprise You (See Prices) Learn More Your fingers can tell you a lot about your personality. What kind of fingers do you have? Laser Cutting Machines | Sponsored Prefabricated Homes | Search Ads | Sponsored dimmi-chi-chiama.it | Sponsored Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now Dera Bakha: Unsold Prefabricated Houses Are on Sale (Take a Look at Prices) Learn More 14 Unique Cat Breeds You Don't See Everyday \uf057 2/22/25, 10:20 Prosecutor flute instructor was \u2018a pig\u2019 who preyed on female students 2/4 Most Read \uf144 \u2018Truly heartbreaking\u2019: 13-year-old student shot to death \uf144 3 shot and killed outside driver licensing office in Louisville \uf144 31-year-old man killed in East End crash \uf144 Deceased man\u2019s belongings thrown out before family could get them, brother says \uf144 15-year-old accused of gunning down the man charged with beating his mom \uf144 Funeral held for 2 kids who froze to death in a van as family is promised a home \uf144 Hospital patient charged after \u2018brutally\u2019 attacking nurse, breaking \u2018every bone\u2019 in her face, deputies say \uf057 2/22/25, 10:20 Prosecutor flute instructor was \u2018a pig\u2019 who preyed on female students 3/4 \uf144 Springfield\u2019s Haitian community forced to leave this summer \uf057 Public Inspection File Applications FOX19QUESTIONS@FOX19NOW 513-562-2405 Terms of Service Privacy Policy Report Advertising Digital Marketing Closed Captioning/Audio Description At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 News Weather Sports Careers Contact the Newsroom 635 West Seventh Street Cincinnati 45203 (513) 421-1919 2/22/25, 10:20 Prosecutor flute instructor was \u2018a pig\u2019 who preyed on female students 4/4"} |
7,332 | William Merwin | Florida Gulf Coast University | [
"7332_101.pdf"
] | {"7332_101.pdf": "Home Help Search Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register. Volley Talk Off the Net Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted XAsstCoach Professional Posts: 3,487 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted Jun 26, 2009 at 2:54am Post by XAsstCoach on Jun 26, 2009 at 2:54am Stumbled across an old article about the lawsuits, and started to wonder what ever happened. Turned out lo...err settled and admitted no wrongdoing with two former coaches. Flood got a couple million, and Vaughn a couple hundreds of thousands in their settlement. The former...yes former president Merwin resigned due to an inappropriate relationship with a female professor. McAloose, the during the Title lawsuit, resigned two days after the settlement was paid out to Flood and Vaughn. BUT...its not over...another sexual discrimination lawsuit is on the horizon against FGCU. This time from the former provost at FGCU. Not to stir the pot, but just some interesting reading.... Gender Bias Alleged -- Again -- at Florida Gulf Coast June 8, 2009 The former provost at Florida Gulf Coast University last week sued the university, alleging gender discrimination, sexual intimidation and retaliation by top-level officials \u2013 including the university\u2019s former president. The federal lawsuit is the latest in a string the university has faced in recent years, mostly pertaining to gender equity disputes in the athletic department. But according to the complaint filed on behalf of Bonnie Yegidis, the former provost, the university\u2019s hostility toward women extends beyond its compliance issues with Title of the Education Amendments of 1972. Yegidis, who served as provost at Florida Gulf Coast from 2004 to 2007, begins her grievances with former president William Merwin, whom she claims made inappropriate and degrading comments to her about her physical appearance \u2013 at one time saying she showed \u201ctoo much boob.\u201d Merwin has denied making such comments. Even after Merwin resigned in January 2007, however \u2013 having admitted to an affair with a female professor \u2013 Yegidis says a hostile work environment persisted. Florida Gulf Coast's spokeswoman, Susan Evans, said the university has not been served with a lawsuit on behalf of Yegidis and \"has no comment at this time on the pending litigation.\" Merwin could not be reached for comment, but he told local reporters he had received numerous comments about Yegidis' choice of attire around the office. Some of the allegations involve what happened when Merwin quit. In the same meeting Yegidis learned of Merwin\u2019s resignation, she was also informed that Richard Pegnetter, a dean in the College of Business, had been chosen as interim president, despite Yegidis\u2019 position as second to the president for the three years prior. When she approached the chairman of the Board of Trustees to express 2/22/25, 10:20 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted | Volley Talk 1/5 concern that she had been wrongfully overlooked, Yegidis says she was directed to take her grievances up with the interim president. Instead, she filed a discrimination complaint with the university\u2019s Office of Equal Opportunity Programs few months later, according to the lawsuit, the university\u2019s general counsel, Wendy Morris, told Yegidis that the former interim athletic director at Florida Gulf Coast had filed a letter with the interim president complaining about the university\u2019s noncompliance with Title requirements. Yegidis asked the interim president to see the letter but was instead informed that Morris would be disciplined for \u201cinterfering with\u2026 directives regarding the appropriate level of review\u201d of the athletic director\u2019s letter. Morris was subsequently fired, and in the fall of last year settled for $800,000 a lawsuit in which she charged the university with unlawful gender discrimination and attempting to cover up illegal gender inequity in the athletic department. Her settlement became effective less than a month before the university settled with two more former employees alleging sex discrimination, retaliation and defamation. Former volleyball coach Jaye Flood was awarded $2.965 million and former women\u2019s golf coach Holly Vaughn was awarded $435,000. The university admitted no wrongdoing in any of the settlements. In the time between Morris\u2019 termination and her eventual settlement with the university, though, Yegidis says she repeatedly informed top-level university officials that Morris\u2019 firing \u2013 and the treatment of women at the university \u2013 was unlawful. Yegidis said she was assured things would change under the leadership of the new president, Wilson Bradshaw; instead, she says, she found quite the opposite to be true. In one of her first meetings with the new president, in the fall of 2007, Yegidis was told she needed to submit her resignation as provost and vice president of academic affairs. \u201c[Yegidis] complained to Bradshaw that she was being treated unfavorably because of her advocacy on behalf of women. Bradshaw responded that he wanted her \u2018out by Friday,\u2019 \u201d the complaint reads. \u201cAs directed, [Yegidis] submitted her letter of resignation which was involuntary and forced upon her by the President.\u201d Instead of accepting the \u201cvoluntary demotion\u201d asked of her, the complaint continues, Yegidis accepted a position at the University of Tennessee, where she has been serving as vice president for academic affairs and student success since July 2008. The damages Yegidis is seeking include front pay, back pay, unpaid benefits, attorney\u2019s fees and a court order forcing the university take whatever steps necessary to comply with Title IX. While the university is not commenting at this time, it is no secret that this latest lawsuit comes in the wake of Florida Gulf Coast\u2019s attempts to clear its muddied reputation regarding gender issues \u2013 especially following Morris\u2019 lawsuit. Among her own personal grievances, Morris noted in her complaint that \u201cit was open season on women at the university stipulation in Morris\u2019 settlement prohibits both Morris and members of the university Board of Trustees from commenting on the settlement or disparaging each other in any way. Among the university officials who have left Florida Gulf Coast because of sexually inappropriate conduct or in the wake of sexual discrimination allegations are Merwin, who resigned in 2007 after confessing to an inappropriate relationship with a professor, and athletic director Carl McAloose, who resigned two days following the $3.4 million payout to two former female coaches. Pegnetter, former interim president, submitted his resignation as dean of the business school shortly after the litigious crossfire but has since decided to stay on through January 2011 when his contract expires. Pegnetter said his retirement plans were not predicated on the sexual discrimination settlements -- but did file his own complaint 2/22/25, 10:20 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted | Volley Talk 2/5 Thrill of the 'ville Gator Gang Posts: 6,551 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted Jun 26, 2009 at 9:58am Post by Thrill of the 'ville on Jun 26, 2009 at 9:58am feel really bad for the students at few years ago this school looked like a good option: great weather, nice community, developing area. It had lots of potential. But all these lawsuits and other resignations/firings have put a hinderence on the potential of the school and its turning area kids away from going there. This institution was a good option for Florida students who couldn't get into the bigger schools like and FSU...but now even those kids are turning their backs. There are even more issues than you're hearing about few other professors have been let go or resigned because of trouble they have gotten in. I'm juad mmy sister is transferring from there before it hits rock bottom. XAsstCoach Professional Posts: 3,487 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted Jun 26, 2009 at 10:47am Post by XAsstCoach on Jun 26, 2009 at 10:47am Turns out they settled with Wendy Morris, the former attorney at that was fired by Pegnetter (interim President during this time) for \"interfering\" with the athletics sexual discrimination case. Settlement was for $800,000 and made soon after the announcement of the Flood and Vaughn settlement. doles out $800,000 to settle another discrimination lawsuit By (Contact) Originally published 7:37 p.m., Thursday, October 16, 2008 Updated 8:33 p.m., Thursday, October 16, 2008 Related Documents * Settlement Agreement between Florida Gulf Coast University and former attorney Wendy Morris 2/22/25, 10:20 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted | Volley Talk 3/5 This settlement agreement, dated Sept. 24, 2008, resolves counter lawsuits between Florida Gulf Coast University and former attorney Wendy Morris. Morris's federal suit had alleged gender discrimination. Morris received $800,000 in the settlement from the university, which admitted no wrongdoing \u2014 Florida Gulf Coast University is resembling a free-flowing lately, spewing out a load of cash to settle a couple of lawsuits in the past few weeks. The university has doled out more than $4.2 million to prevent two different federal gender equity lawsuits lodged by three former women employees from going to court. Former university attorney Wendy Morris will receive $800,000 to settle a lawsuit dealing with allegations of gender discrimination, the Daily News discovered Thursday after a public information request. Wednesday, the university announced it will pay former volleyball coach Jaye Flood $2.965 million and former women\u2019s golf coach Holly Vaughn $435,000. The settlement with Morris became effective on Sept. 25. The settlement with the two coaches was finalized last Friday. Eight days ago, Richard Pegnetter announced that he would be retiring as the dean of the College of Business in 10 months. As the interim president of the university for nearly nine months in 2007, Pegnetter found himself in the crossfire of all of the eventual lawsuits. He fired Morris and among the claims in Morris\u2019 lawsuit was that Pegnetter had tried to cover up the initial claims of sex discrimination in the athletics department, particularly involving Flood and Vaughn. Pegnetter said Thursday that there is no correlation between the settlements and his retirement announcement. The 67-year-old noted his age and said he had planned to retire even earlier but his time as interim president delayed the decision. \u201cNo,\u201d said Pegnetter when asked if he was asked to retire by President Wilson Bradshaw. \u201cNot even an implication of asking me to step down.\u201d Pegnetter said it is customary for university teachers and deans to give plenty of notice to universities because the typical academic recruiting starts in the fall to hire staff for the next year. Even in retirement, Pegnetter will serve as a special assistant to Bradshaw addressing regional economic development. He currently serves on the Collier and Charlotte counties economic development boards and the Lee County Horizon Council. He said he couldn\u2019t comment on the particulars of the lawsuits. \u201cEveryone is pleased to move forward,\u201d Pegnetter said of the settlements. As part of the 8-page agreement, neither Morris, who has opened a law office in Bonita Springs, or the Board of the Trustees for the university are allowed to comment about the settlement or disparage one another in any way. In the lawsuit filed in April, Morris made several strong allegations against the university. \u201cIt was open season on women at the university,\u201d the lawsuit said. The lawsuit also noted several complaints. One said the \u201cexecutive director of FGCU\u2019s Foundation created a hostile work environment for female employees, was openly disrespectful to female administrators, undermined the authority of female administrators, and had excluded female employees from receptions, luncheons, events and fundraising tournaments\u201d Another even implicated Pegnetter, noting an employee in the Lutgert College of Business \u2014 unnamed in the lawsuit \u2014 told Morris she filed a complaint against Pegnetter when he was still dean of the College of Business, alleging he treated her badly, created a hostile gender-based work environment and had a \u201cpattern of engaging in emotional and threatening rages in one-on-one meetings behind closed doors.\u201d The dispute between Morris and Pegnetter came to a head after Pegnetter didn\u2019t inform Morris 2/22/25, 10:20 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted | Volley Talk 4/5 immediately after the complaints of Flood, Vaughn and the other female coaches were brought to his attention by former athletic director Merrily Dean Baker. Morris objected to Pegnetter\u2019s handling of the coaches' complaints, including not hiring an independent law firm to investigate the matter, having his special assistant e-mail an announcement to the community about the complaint, and claiming that the coaches' complaints were unsubstantiated, even though the university had yet to investigate the matter. Besides the $800,000 settlement figure, which will be paid out to Morris over the next three years also will shell out $50,000 for Morris\u2019 attorney. The Florida Department of Financial Services covered the costs of the attorneys that represented FGCU. The total costs of those fees were not available on Thursday. ************************************************ Interesting \"Related Stories\" they have listed: * POLL: Former provost files gender discrimination lawsuit against school * Former provost plans to file gender discrimination lawsuit rewriting discrimination, harassment policies instructor fired following sexual harassment complaint places two instructors on leave amid sexual harassment complaints * Credibility concerns, potential higher payouts steer to settle lawsuits athletics director resigns after nine-year stint * FGCU, former coaches reach $3.4M settlement * FGCU, former attorney extended settlement timeframe * Deny, deny, deny responds to discrimination lawsuit Click here to remove banner ads from this forum. This Forum Is Hosted For By ProBoards Get Your Own Free Forum! Terms of Service Privacy Cookies Disclosure Report Abuse Your Privacy Choices 2/22/25, 10:20 Florida Gulf Coast University Revisted | Volley Talk 5/5"} |
8,682 | Thomas Wechter | Michigan State University | [] | {} |
8,349 | Sean Kelley | Roosevelt University | [
"8349_101.pdf",
"8349_102.pdf",
"8349_103.pdf",
"8349_104.pdf"
] | {"8349_101.pdf": "2 8 , 2 0 2 0 Student Activists Call In Drama Programs Nationwide University art and theatre programs at predominantly white institutions often claim to be safe havens of artistic acceptance. Clouded by claims of \u2018diversity\u2019 and acceptance, many Rescripted: Artist-led interactive commentary on the state of the arts, including reviews, dialogues, and essays. 2/22/25, 10:20 college 1/4 arts programs and conservatories see themselves as exempt from racist practices and behavior. In reality, white supremacy is just as integral to the fabric of these programs as productions of Hamlet. Student artists are resisting their institutions and using their unique gifts to pave the way towards a more just arts education. Black students, Indigenous students, and students of color who have been harmed by this racist culture\u201d are collaborating, taking action, and demanding change. In addition to the pervasive whiteness and financial oppression often present within the superstructure of any predominantly white university, many experiences of racism and anti-Blackness are specific to drama school, ranging from unforgiving work schedules to classrooms that both inflict and exploit the students\u2019 emotional trauma. As a white graduate of Boston University\u2019s School of Theatre witnessed and was complicit in this racist culture. To date, BU\u2019s School of Theatre only has one full-time faculty member of color, and shows are often cast by tokenizing students of color, or casting white students in roles written for people of color has a guaranteed casting policy which requires most students to perform in whatever show they are cast in each quarter, denying students their artistic agency. Continue reading 1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 2/22/25, 10:20 college 2/4 Trigger warning: sexual harassment and assault, racism, body shaming. \u201cCan we not force students to be around reported abusers? Students and otherwise.\u201d \u2013 Anonymous Roosevelt University Student, June 17, 2019. Just yesterday the news broke that Senn High School teacher and former co-Artistic Director of The Yard, Joel Ewing was charged with a count of sexual assault involving a minor. Earlier this year The Chicago College of Performing Arts at Roosevelt University\u2019s Associate Dean and Director of the Theatre Conservatory Sean Kelley was accused of repeatedly humiliating and sexually harassing his students. This was never reported, but as you can see from the cover photo of this article, students and faculty were quietly 2/22/25, 10:20 college 3/4 notified via e-mail that he was no longer employed at the university after months of outcry on social media. These events, and the culture of every theatre program in America, are closely intertwined, and it\u2019s time we acknowledge that. Continue reading 2/22/25, 10:20 college 4/4", "8349_102.pdf": "June 11, 2019 \u00b7 Chris Peterson, CCPA/Roosevelt University, Sean Kelley Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations One of the more prestigious onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 1/15 performing art colleges in Chicago is reeling over allegations by its former students. The accusations against Chicago College of Performing Arts at Roosevelt University range from the treatment of students to unethical behavior and racial discrimination. Multiple former students have also come forward with allegations of sexual harassment against a current faculty member. The controversy began when actress and former student, Netta Walker, posted a onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 2/15 lengthy statement on Facebook following her win at the Jeff Awards the night before. She states, \u201cThe program at Roosevelt University is abusive. This university taught me that was less than my peers in the following ways; they did not cast me, they chose white male dominated seasons, they deliberately did not try to utilize me, they refused to cast outside both the racial and gender binaries, and taught exclusively white theatrical history. This program is still heavily run by white men, and onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 3/15 has not changed any of these practices.\u201d Later in the post, she describes a moment where she was considering dropping out due to her father\u2019s declining health went to my Dean to talk to him about dropping out, and he responded by saying \u201cYour father would be disappointed in you cried and kept this to myself for a few months because felt shamed and feared he would be correct. He was not.\u201d onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 4/15 Sadly, Ms. Walker\u2019s father passed away the next year. In the wake of Ms. Walker\u2019s post, multiple other former students have come forward on social media with their allegations. While some of them outline other patterns of abuse at the school, others are coming forward with sexual harassment allegations against Associate Dean and Director of Theatre, Sean Kelley. One studen t states that Mr. Kelley Sean Kelley onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 5/15 \u201ccommunicated explicitly that he was picturing my classmate and having intercourse by saying he felt \"it looked like we would have great sex\". Another student, who identifies as genderqueer, alleges that Mr. Kelley, \u201ctried to get me to gossip about other women in my class who he thought were questioning their sexuality. \u201c Others have reported incidents involving unwanted touching and kissing by Mr. Kelley. One student has stated that they reported various onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 6/15 incidents to school officials, yet nothing was done. Calls to Mr. Kelley\u2019s office have not been returned petition has already started to circulate, calling for Mr. Kelley\u2019s termination. In response to the mounting allegations has released the following statement, \u201cAs many of you have heard, over the past few days, there have been postings on social media that assert allegations against one of our faculty members. Please know that the onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 7/15 University is now aware of the allegations and is in the process of investigating them. If you believe you have pertinent information, or have any concerns of your own that you would like to report, please contact: - Toyia K. Stewart for Human Resources, tkstewart@roosev elt.edu, (312) 341-2137 - Alice Jones, Title Coordinator Investigator, ajones90@roosev elt.edu, (312) 341-2051 Please know that the University takes complaints onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 8/15 very seriously and also that the University strictly prohibits retaliation. Roosevelt University values every member of its community, including current and former students, faculty, and other staff. It is important to us that these matters be investigated promptly and thoroughly, and that members of our community feel comfortable voicing any and all concerns. We will provide updates on these matters when/as we are able.\u201d Several faculty members from the department have also released a statement onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 9/15 regarding this situation. \"To our Theatre Conservatory community, Thank you to all of you who have bravely come forward. We are heartbroken and blindsided by the scope and depth of the shared testimonials from our students and alumni. We are deeply upset and feel for all of you. Our educational and artistic spaces must be safe. Our students must be safe. We refuse to accept an environment that allows harassment, bullying, and abuse. We stand behind you and acknowledge the onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 10/15 need for transformational change. We are proud of each and every student and alumni, and we are reclaiming this as a place that we can and will be proud to work. That we can all feel proud to claim. We want to regain your trust - which we know has been broken. We understand this is an unsettling and traumatic time - for all of us. We are ready to listen and to together find ways in which we can make the Theatre Conservatory the place you want to learn and grow. Sincerely, onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 11/15 Your faculty and staff [the undersigned] Carolyn Jean Brady, Adjunct Voice Instructor Becky Curl, Adjunct Faculty Daniel Drake, Production and Facilities Coordinator Ray Frewen, Associate Professor, Assistant Director of the Conservatory Nadine Gomes, Lecturer in Voice Coburn Goss, Adjunct Faculty Gina Graffagna, Adjunct Voice Instructor Amanda Horvath- Adair, Assistant Director of Admissions onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 12/15 Janelle Rienstra Jones, Adjunct Faculty Elise Kauzlaric, Adjunct Professor Kendall Kelley, Managing Director Shane Kenyon, Adjunct Faculty Steve Kruse, Technical Director Emily McConnell, Costume Designer Ann McMann, Adjunct Voice Instructor Allegra Montanari, Director of the Center for Arts Leadership Dan Roberts, Adjunct Faculty Kyle Sackett, Adjunct Voice onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 13/15 Instructor Rebecca Schorsch, Lecturer in Voice Becca Skrha, Admission Counselor Barbara Zahora, Visiting Assistant Professor\" We will continue to update this piece with new information as it becomes available. onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 14/15 Shock Factors: How Much Is Too Much An Ode to the Producers Latest Posts 'Center Stage' Turns 25 Love Letter to the Ultimate Dance Movie \u201cTwenty-five years ago, a group of young dancers pirouetted onto our screens, and Center Stage became an instant classic\u201d Read More \u2192 The Best Theatre Colleges in Every State : Vermont \u201cVermont is an exceptional state for theatre students, offering a rich artistic community, outstanding college programs, and abundant performance opportunities. Schools like Middlebury College and the University of Vermont provide top-tier faculty, excellent facilities, and a commitment to diversity and inclusion.\u201d Read More \u2192 Feb 21, 2025 onstage blog 0 2/22/25, 10:20 Prominent Performing Arts College Rocked by Explosive Allegations \u2014 OnStage Blog 15/15", "8349_103.pdf": "Fire Sean Kelley Started 8 June 2019 Petition to Roosevelt University Victory This petition made change with 800 supporters! Share this petition Why this petition matters Started by Tatyana Chante For years, former Dean and current faculty member, Sean Kelley, is known for his inappropriate sexual harassment and behavior towards many of the young men that have and currently attend can\u2019t speak to it personally but feel it is my responsibility to speak out to protect those who might not be able to. Below is a picture of an obviously underage boy that our former dean liked on Instagram. For any decent human being this should raise a lot of red flags and will not sit back anymore letting him get away with this kind of behavior. We all payed too much money for our education to have to worry about sexually harassing us. It is not our job as students to have to fight this, our primary job is learning; but when other higher ups neglect to do anything find it my duty, as an alum, to say something feel guilty for not posting this earlier but fear for this incoming class and realizes their safety is more important than me being comfortable. We ,the current and former students, staff, and faculty of and members of the community, do not want this kind of many on campus anymore GO. My original Facebook post on the matter: story_fbid=10213525447361287&id=1554922072&ref=bookmarks Petition details Comments 2/22/25, 10:20 Petition \u00b7 Fire Sean Kelley - Chicago, United States \u00b7 Change.org 1/3 Share this petition in person or use the code for your own material. Download Code Report a policy violation Decision-Makers Roosevelt University Company About Impact Careers Team Community Blog Community Guidelines Support Help Guides Privacy Terms Cookie Policy Manage Cookies Connect Facebook English (United Kingdom) \u00a9 2025, Change.org Share this petition 2/22/25, 10:20 Petition \u00b7 Fire Sean Kelley - Chicago, United States \u00b7 Change.org 2/3 This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:20 Petition \u00b7 Fire Sean Kelley - Chicago, United States \u00b7 Change.org 3/3", "8349_104.pdf": "1 8 , 2 0 1 9 Rescripted: Artist-led interactive commentary on the state of the arts, including reviews, dialogues, and essays. 2/22/25, 10:21 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 1/5 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities Trigger warning: sexual harassment and assault, racism, body shaming. \u201cCan we not force students to be around reported abusers? Students and otherwise.\u201d \u2013 Anonymous Roosevelt University Student, June 17, 2019. Just yesterday the news broke that Senn High School teacher and former co-Artistic Director of The Yard, Joel Ewing was charged with a count of sexual assault involving a minor. Earlier this year The Chicago College of Performing Arts at Roosevelt University\u2019s Associate Dean and Director of the Theatre Conservatory Sean Kelley was accused of repeatedly humiliating and sexually harassing his students. This was never reported, but as you can see from the cover photo of this article, students and faculty were quietly notified via e-mail that he was no longer employed at the university after months of outcry on social media. These events, and the culture of every theatre program in America, are closely intertwined, and it\u2019s time we acknowledge that. CCPA\u2019s program specifically suffered from a longstanding history of racial discrimination and physical discrimination in the form of fat shaming students and pitting ingenues against each other, in addition to their Associate Dean\u2019s sexual harassment. Alumni Tatyana Chante and Netta Walker took it upon themselves to host a forum for the students and alumni affected by the toxic culture of Sean Kelley\u2019s theatre department, in the spirit of healing. As Chante put it, the students have been living with this for almost thirteen years. \u201cThis school has, over the years, found a way to crush the spirit of it\u2026 that is not all faculty just a few people.\u201d The quotes that litter this article are from that forum. They brilliantly asked their peers to both participate in a guided conversation with intimacy choreographer Gaby Labotka, director Lavina Jadhwani, casting director Catherine Miller, and former professor 2/22/25, 10:21 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 2/5 Candace Taylor , and also to reflect in writing as the conversation took place. Netta Walker read these aloud during the breaks. \u201cTechnique is not trauma.\u201d Theatre teachers have an unprecedented amount of access to and influence over their students never recall hugging my English teachers, but hugged my theatre teachers never drank with my math teachers went out for drinks with theatre teachers after conservatory, usually rounds they bought for us. If boundaries are not properly set, teachers in theatre or performing arts have an unbelievable amount of access to a young person\u2019s mind set, self image, and sometimes their physical person. It is not an uncommon undergraduate acting experience of my peers to have been told they are unworthy of a career, that they are fat, that they are untalented, by the people paid to instruct them need a space free of anger or fear.\u201d It was a bloody excavation of every dirty secret every student and alumni in that room had been forced to keep for almost a decade, and it was ugly. Tear filled allegations surfaced one after another like they were bubbling out of the guts of hell, and yet they were talking about a school that some of them still attend. Candace Taylor, a former professor, talked about being given the \u201cLeftovers\u201d (the other teachers\u2019 phrase, not hers) after the white teachers had finished casting their favorites. Taylor\u2019s productions were given the least amount of resources and she was never permitted to work on a mainstage piece. \u201cThere\u2019s no one who looks like me, so there\u2019s no one who\u2019s thinking of me.\u201d \u2013 Students went on to attest that most of the people who dropped out of their school were people of color. One even added \u201cwhite men are the people favored\u201d because that is the demographic of their faculty. Young gay white men were told to \u201cstraighten things out\u201d and asked to be more straight-passing (whatever that means) for roles. The former professor recalled students being called \u201clight in their loafers\u201d amongst the faculty, an old euphemism that suggests someone might be gay. \u201cStop making fun of or pointing out our hickeys.\u201d At Roosevelt you must sign a contract dictating you will perform whatever role faculty casts you as, an obligation working professionals don\u2019t even have. They would recount 2/22/25, 10:21 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 3/5 going into auditions, terrified they\u2019d be asked to do something they didn\u2019t want to do particularly ferocious anecdote from a class that was voiced at the discussion involved a young woman being essentially waterboarded. \u201cAn end to body discriminations, including fat letters. Stop requiring workout classes. It encourages eating disorders.\u201d What you need to know about this event is that this is merely the surface of the allegations of the school. The situation is littered with horrifying details. The change.org petition that calls for his firing clearly shows a photo of a nude, underage boy Sean Kelley liked on instagram. Within five minutes of asking a student questions they informed me of this, showed me the photo, and then began to describe the type of young boy Sean Kelley is interested in without missing a beat. Every adult in that room was white- knuckling the arms of their chairs during that 90 minutes and know why wish hadn\u2019t been taught needed their approval or validation.\u201d We were gripping our chairs because we cannot keep them safe know that because was not saved theatremaker met as a teenager caressed my shoulder, asked me when my 18th birthday was, and then wrote it down in a notebook didn\u2019t realize how strange that was for years. There have been times was academically bullied into playing a role did not want to do because it was the \u2018black\u2019 part, there have been times teachers have told me was not worthy (of what?) and left me crying in public hallways. Time, space, and age have allowed me to forget these things, but the experiences of the students at Senn, and the students at Roosevelt, have now brought them to the forefront of my mind. \u201cNobody should be hurt at work. Nobody should be hurt at school.\u201d \u2013 Gaby Labotka There is no theatre program in the United States that is not possible of generating these judgemental, unhealthy conditions for their students. There is little to no supervision of professors and the way they actually interact with their students at the college level. Like the Roosevelt students I\u2019ve filed complaints and seen them go to nowhere. I\u2019ve also been a teacher for many years and most boundaries have set with my students have had to set myself, no one has told me to do that. In fact, in some theatre programs I\u2019ve had to argue giving my number to minors, or friending them on facebook. 2/22/25, 10:21 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 4/5 Thankfully, the Roosevelt students and panelists offered their own solutions to this incredibly dense problem and will leave them here, as a place to start. Appropriate student-teacher boundaries (office hours, physical touch boundaries concrete, unbiased reporting path Value placed on student growth rather than student survival * Student driven programming Transparent casting processes driven by student interest Including pronouns and conversations of gender in everyday life on campus *Student Survival. The reason our teachers traumatized us and made us ask the age old question \u2013 that was repeated at this forum \u2013 is this what the real world is going to be like? Let me tell you right now: it\u2019s not. When you can create space you can hire intimacy coordinators, create harassment reporting paths, bring in diversity and empathy and harassment trainings. When you create your own space, you can create whatever culture you want. Never forget if you are in a toxic culture, especially a toxic academic culture, it was created with the specific intention to benefit somebody that is not you. So if can say one word to my own students \u2013 do not depend on your teachers. Carry on the work of these students, and create your own healing. Author\u2019s Note: Thank you to the students from Roosevelt who so generously donated their time and energy to trying to fix a problem they did not create. Support and love to everyone involved at CCPA, Senn High School, The Yard, and throughout the greater artistic community who have been affected by these events 2/22/25, 10:21 Abuse Is Not Art: The Yard, CCPA, and Academic Atrocities 5/5"} |
8,381 | A. Abbot Ikeler | Rhode Island College | [
"8381_101.pdf"
] | {"8381_101.pdf": "22, 1984 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed professor at Rhode Island College has been suspended for 10 months without pay for kissing a student against her will. A. Abbot Ikeler, 40, denied the allegation The faculty union has filed a grievance contending Ikeler was denied due process and should be reinstated. Students have petitioned the school president for an explanation. Officials said Ikeler was suspended earlier this month, the first employee disciplined under the two-year-old sexual harassment policy that prohibits employees from forcing their attentions on anyone. The student alleged the professor -- who has taught at for seven years and is an associate professor of English -- tried to kiss her on the mouth after a meeting in his office. 'The student and were left alone by sheer accident,' Ikeler was quoted Thursday by the Providence Journal. He said another \uf09a \uf02f \uf003 2/22/25, 10:21 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed Archives 1/5 person associated with a student literary magazine invited the student to the meeting but then was unable to attend. College officials declined to identify the student involved. The anti-harassment policy does not impose punishment. That is left to the school's president, David Sweet, who said only he 'imposed sanctions.' The duration of the punishment was confirmed by 'other officials familiar with the case,' according to the Providence Journal The American Federation of Teachers filed the grievance student group has filed a petition asking Sweet for an explanation, and a similar petition was circulating among faculty members. Odd News // 19 hours ago Goat rescued from fifth floor window ledge Feb. 21 (UPI) -- Firefighters in Madrid came to the rescue of a goat that somehow ended up stranded on a ledge on the fifth floor of an apartment building. Odd News // 19 hours ago $50,000 lottery ticket was selected by winner's wife Feb. 21 Kentucky man scored a $50,000 lottery prize from a scratch-off ticket that was selected by his wife. Latest Headlines 2/22/25, 10:21 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed Archives 2/5 Odd News // 21 hours ago Vulture that 'loves people' escapes nature show in Georgia Feb. 21 rescued black vulture escaped from his home with a Georgia nature show and has been seen wandering loose south of Atlanta. Odd News // 23 hours ago 'Waldo' the Scottish highland bull on the loose in Connecticut Feb. 21 (UPI) -- Animal control officials in Connecticut are asking residents to keep an eye out for an escaped Scottish highland bull on the loose for about six weeks. Odd News // 1 day ago 'Remarkably rotund' Chicago beaver becomes an online celebrity Feb. 20 Chicago nonprofit is asking social media users to help name a \"remarkably rotund\" beaver caught on camera in the city. Odd News // 1 day ago Distraught Lions fan's mood improves with $500,000 lottery win Feb. 20 Michigan man said his day took a nosedive when the Detroit Lions lost their playoff game, but quickly improved when he won a $500,000 lottery prize. Odd News // 1 day ago Micro-artist creates Lego sculpture the size of a blood cell Feb. 20 (UPI) -- An artist from England broke a Guinness World Record when he created a sculpture of a Lego brick roughly the same size as a human white blood cell. Odd News // 1 day ago Escaped porcupine captured in Tennessee Feb. 20 (UPI) -- Wildlife authorities in Tennessee were called out to rescue an unusual escaped pet: a porcupine. Odd News // 2 days ago Denver Zoo announces birth of red-necked wallaby Feb. 19 (UPI) -- The Denver Zoo announced the birth of a red-necked wallaby, the first baby to be born in the facility's new Down Under habitat. 2/22/25, 10:21 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed Archives 3/5 Odd News // 2 days ago Man wins $1.3M after using same lottery numbers for four years Feb. 19 Michigan Lottery player who stuck with the same set of Lotto 47 numbers for four years found his persistence paid off with a $1.3 million jackpot Director Kash Patel wants to move jobs to field offices, Alabama complex Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Charles Q. Brown Jr., Chief of Naval Operations Lisa Franchetti fired U.S. Supreme Court prevents top watchdog from being fired for now Stock indexes suffer worst losses this year amid consumer, business economic fears $50,000 lottery ticket was selected by winner's wife Trending Stories Follow Us 2/22/25, 10:21 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed Archives 4/5 About Contact Corrections Advertisements Copyright \u00a9 2025 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy 2/22/25, 10:21 Professor suspended for kissing co-ed Archives 5/5"} |
7,419 | John C. Bonnell | Macomb Community College | [
"7419_101.pdf",
"7419_102.pdf",
"7419_103.pdf",
"7419_104.pdf",
"7419_105.pdf",
"7419_106.pdf",
"7419_107.pdf"
] | {"7419_101.pdf": "Case Law ( Bonnell v. Lorenzo Decision Date 27 August 1999 Docket Number Civil Action No. 99-71155. Citation 81 F.Supp.2d 777 Parties Professor John and Nancy L. Bonnell, Plaintiffs, v. Albert LORENZO, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as President of Macomb Community College; William MacQueen, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Vice President for Human Resources of Macomb Community College; Gus J. Demas, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Dean of Arts and Sciences for Macomb Community College; and Mark Cousens, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as the Attorney for the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization, Defendants. Court U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of Michigan Your World of Legal Intelligence (/) United States | 1-800-335-6202 Document Cited authorities 39 Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related 81 F.Supp.2d 777 Professor John and Nancy L. Bonnell, Plaintiffs, v. Albert LORENZO, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as President of Macomb Community College; William MacQueen, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Vice President for Human Resources of Macomb Community College; Gus J. Demas, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Dean of Arts and Sciences for Macomb Community College; and Mark Cousens, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as the Attorney for the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization, Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-71155. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 27, 1999. Juan A. Mateo and James C. Howarth, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Thomas P. Brady, Detroit, MI, Timothy S. Ferrand, Pontiac, MI, for Defendants BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff John C. Bonnell's Emergency Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court heard oral argument on this motion on July 15 and 30, and August 3 and 19, 1999. Upon consideration of the motion, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court Plaintiff's motion and his immediate reinstatement with pay as a Professor of English at Macomb Community College Although the instant complaint is based in part on discipline received for using allegedly profane classroom language, the Court's resolution of the instant motion, as discussed infra, does not reach the issue of First Amendment protection of the specific profane speech used by Plaintiff in his classroom. The issue presently before this Court is whether, given the instant fact scenario, Plaintiff, who was already been suspended from teaching for seven months, can be suspended for an additional four months based upon the Defendants' determination that he violated the confidentiality of a student complainant, and retaliated against that student who had filed a complaint against him based upon his use of profane language in the classroom. Specifically, the issue is whether Plaintiff's conduct in releasing the student's complaint, after removing the student's name and class, and attaching an eight page memorandum discussing the First Amendment in responding to the complaint, was protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution, or was instead a violation of confidentiality and an act of retaliation against the student. This Court concludes that Plaintiff's conduct in releasing a redacted copy of the complaint, attached to his response entitled An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause, was protected by the First Amendment and was not a breach of confidentiality or retaliation against the student complainant A. Underlying Factual Development Plaintiff1 Professor John C. Bonnell filed the instant action alleging, inter alia, that disciplinary action imposed against him violates his civil rights. The lawsuit names as defendants in their individual and representative capacities Albert Lorenzo, President of Macomb Community College (MCC); William MacQueen, Vice President for Human Resources of MCC; Gus J. Demas, Dean of Arts and Sciences for MCC; and Mark Cousens, the attorney for the faculty union, the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization (MCCFO).2 Neither nor are named as defendants. Bonnell has been a professor of English and literature at since 1967. Bonnell asserts that throughout the decades he has employed \"all of the English language\" in his teaching style, including words which some may regard as offensive. Until the events giving rise to the instant action, Bonnell has never been disciplined for his use of classroom language. The genesis of this matter arises from a complaint filed against Bonnell by a student of his in the fall 1998 semester. The student asserted that Bonnell's profane language in the classroom, while not directed at any student, amounted to sexual harassment. Defendants ultimately determined that while colorable, the complaint lacked merit as to the sexual harassment claim. However suspended Bonnell for three days in February 1999 due to his allegedly profane classroom language. Thereafter, Bonnell responded to the student's complaint by redacting her name and class and distributing it along with his response, An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause reacted to Bonnell's response by suspending him for four months without pay, primarily for breach of confidentiality and for retaliation against the student complainant uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service had established a sexual harassment policy in September 1992 which also enveloped the use of non- germane, profane language in the classroom. The policy stated, inter alia, that the [MCC] administration concluded that academic freedom does not protect acts of sexual harassment or the use of profane, vulgar, or obscene language which is unrelated to the course content and educational purpose. (Sexual Harassment Memorandum, Sept. 15, 1992 Defendants' Response, OMPI,3 Ex. 1.) It also warned that the College will discipline teachers who sexually harass their students or gratuitously and regularly use profane, vulgar, or obscene language in the classroom. (Id.) The Court notes that the policy and the memorandum deal with two separate issues -- first, sexual harassment, and second, the use of non-germane, profane language. The Court recognizes that there is a significant difference, constitutionally, between the First Amendment protections afforded to an individual regarding use of classroom language, and use of language to retaliate against a student. Nevertheless because Bonnell's classroom language was the basis for the student's complaint, it is important to note that there is no evidence that Bonnell's use of profane language in the classroom was ever directed toward a particular student. MCC's sexual harassment policy was revised in February 1996 and May 1997. Defendant MacQueen, MCC's Vice President for Human Resources, issued a memorandum on July 30, 1997 which he distributed with the policy and which stated: Regular use of profane, vulgar or obscene speech in the classroom which is not germane to course content (and thus educational purpose) as measured by professional standards will lead to the imposition of discipline Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 3.) On January 19, 1998, a parent of a Bonnell student (not the student complainant in this matter) complained to about a handout Bonnell distributed in class. (See Letter by Keith Waller, Jan. 19, 1998 Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 4.) The handout, titled My Semester Overview, was prepared in 1991 by one of Bonnell's former students and reviewed Bonnell's course. The review is generally favorable, except for the professor's use of profanity. (See My Semester Overview Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 4.) Bonnell contends that he distributes this handout to his students at the beginning of each semester in order place them on notice of the type of language he employs in teaching the English course. Based on the January 19, 1998 complaint from the parent, MacQueen initiated an investigation. MacQueen wrote Bonnell a memo on February 19, 1998 regarding \"Obscene and vulgar language in classroom,\" and scheduled a meeting with Bonnell and his union representative on February 26, 1998. (See Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 5.) In a memorandum dated February 23, 1998, Bonnell agreed to the meeting and defended the language he used. (See Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 6.) Bonnell explained that he never directed any vulgar terms toward a particular student, and that he only used the words to demonstrate an academic point. With regard to the terms in My Semester Overview, Bonnell contended that he rarely used words like \"pussy\" or \"cunt\" as they are so emotionally charged. Bonnell maintained that he employed these terms to demonstrate \"the chauvinistic, degrading attitudes in society that depicts women as sexual objects, as compared with certain words used to describe male genitalia which are not taboo or considered to be deliberately intended to degrade.\" (Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, at 3.) The February 1998 investigation concluded with MacQueen issuing Bonnell a warning letter on March 4, 1998. The letter advised Bonnell that uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 To continue reading Request your trial Unless germane to a discussion of appropriate course materials and thus a constitutionally protected act of academic freedom, your utterance in the classroom of such words as `fuck,' `cunt,' and `pussy' may serve as a reasonable basis for concluding as a matter of law that you are fostering a learning environment hostile to women, a form of sexual harassment. (Memorandum Regarding Obscene and Vulgar Speech, March 4, 1998; Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. C.) During the 1998 fall semester, a second complaint was filed against Bonnell, which became the catalyst for the action at bar. On November 6, 1996, a female student enrolled in Bonnell's English 122 course telephoned to complain about his classroom language. An, as yet, unidentified employee instructed her to reduce her complaint to writing. She, thereafter, filed a written complaint which, in four places, termed her complaint about language as relating to sexual harassment. MCC, thereafter, treated it as a sexual harassment complaint. The written complaint alleged that, in discussing sexually charged literature, Bonnell used \"lude [sic] and obscene comments ... [which] were dehumanizing, degrading, and sexually explicit.\" (Sexual Harassment Complaint, Nov. 6, 1998; (Attachment 1 Defendants' Brief, OMPI, Ex. 8.) Based on this charge, Defendant Demas, MCC's Dean of Arts and Sciences, instituted an investigation of Bonnell on November 16, 1998. Demas provided Bonnell a copy of the complaint and informed him that a meeting was scheduled to discuss it, and uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 2 cases Search in 2 citing cases \uf014 Leach v. New Mexico Junior College ( United States Court of Appeals of New Mexico February 19, 2002 ...a plaintiff was not required to exhaust contractual grievance procedures prior to filing suit under Section 1983); Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F.Supp.2d 777, 778 (E.D.Mich.1999), rev'd on other grounds, 241 F.3d 800 (6th Cir.2001); Mellody v. Upper Merion Area Sch. Dist., 1998 54383 (E.D.Pa.1...... McReady v. Montgomery Cmty. Coll. ( 891444930) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 District of Maryland September 30, 2020 ...added) (reversing the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's first amendment claim on exhaustion grounds); Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777, 788 (E.D. Mich. 1999) (\"professors do not need to exhaust either state administrative remedies or remedies provided by collective bargaining ...... 1-800-335-6202 Terms of use ( \u00a92025 vLex.com All rights reserved uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041", "7419_102.pdf": "Case Overview Macomb Community College: Censorship of Professor\u2019s Classroom Speech Macomb Community College In 1998, Macomb Community College suspended English professor John Bonnell after a student complained about Bonnell\u2019s use of racy and profane language when discussing literature that dealt with controversial and sex-related topics. Although determined that Bonnell\u2019s discussion was not sexual harassment, it suspended Bonnell under the college\u2019s sexual harassment policy. Bonnell sued for violating his rights submitted an amicus brief arguing that MCC\u2019s suspension of Bonnell violated his academic freedom. In August 1999, a Michigan district court determined that violated Bonnell\u2019s First Amendment rights, and required the college to reinstate him immediately. On appeal, however, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court\u2019s order, stating that because Bonnell\u2019s comments were not related to the topic of his course, the \u201clegitimate interests of the employer far outweigh those of the employee.\u201d Free Speech Macomb Community College Become a member \u00a9 2024 Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression 510 Walnut St. | Suite 900 Philadelphia 19106 [email protected] 215-717", "7419_103.pdf": "Federal Cases ( Bonnell v. Lorenzo Decision Date 04 February 2000 Docket Number No. 99-2047,99-2047 Citation 241 F.3d 800 Parties (6th Cir. 2001) John C. Bonnell and Nancy L. Bonnell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Albert Lorenzo, William MacQueen, and Gus J. Demas, Defendants-Appellants, Mark Cousens, Defendant. Argued: Court U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Sixth Circuit Your World of Legal Intelligence (/) United States | 1-800-335-6202 Document Cited authorities 61 Cited in 122 Precedent Map Related Page 800 241 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2001) John C. Bonnell and Nancy L. Bonnell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Albert Lorenzo, William MacQueen, and Gus J. Demas, Defendants-Appellants, Mark Cousens, Defendant. No. 99-2047 Argued: February 4, 2000 Decided and Filed: March 1, 2001 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit: No. 99-71155, Paul D. Borman, District Judge. Page 801 Copyrighted Material Omitted Page 802 Juan A. Mateo, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellees uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Gerald K. Evelyn, Detroit, Michigan, for Amici Curiae. Hunter L. Wendt, Mt. Clemens, Michigan, Thomas P. Brady, Jeffrey A. Steele & HATHAWAY, Detroit, Michigan, Timothy S. Ferrand, CUMMINGS, McCLOREY & ACHO, Roseville, Michigan, for Appellants. James C. Howarth, Mark H. Cousens, Souhtfield, MI< prose. Donald J. Mooney, Jr & ARONOFF, Cincinnati, Ohio, Before: NELSON, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges. CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., joined. NELSON, J. (pp. 49-51), delivered a separate concurring opinion. CLAY, Circuit Judge Defendants, Albert Lorenzo, William MacQueen, and Gus J. Demas, appeal from the order granting Plaintiffs, John C. Bonnell and his wife Nancy L. Bonnell, injunctive relief as to Defendants' disciplinary suspension of John Bonnell from his teaching position at Macomb Community College (\"the College\"), in this case brought by Plaintiffs for, among other things, violation of John Bonnell's civil rights under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 and \u00a71985. This case presents us with the difficult task of balancing the precious First Amendment rights of a professor in the academic setting, against the legal obligation of a college to guarantee the rights of students to learn in an environment free of sexual harassment and hostility. Mindful of the significant import of the respective interests involved, we conclude that the balance tips in favor of the College such that the district court erred in granting the extraordinary relief of a preliminary injunction under the specific facts of this case. We therefore the district court's order Plaintiff has taught English Language and Literature at the College since the Fall of 1967. Plaintiff is a member of the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization Page 803 (\"MCCFO\") and is employed pursuant to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (\"CBA\"). In a memorandum dated February 19, 1998, entitled \"Obscene and vulgar language in classroom,\" MacQueen informed Plaintiff that the parent of one of Plaintiff's students (not the complainant in the instant case) had filed a letter of complaint against him based upon a handout that Plaintiff had circulated to the members of his class. The handout, entitled \"My Semester Overview,\" is actually a review of Plaintiff's class prepared by one of Plaintiff's former students in 1991. The handout, as quoted in the memorandum, states as follows: \"Next, the language that was used during the first four weeks or so of class, in my opinion, was very inappropriate and distasteful. Never before have encountered an English teacher who used the word \"fuck\" so openly and so frequently in a classroom discussion. In addition, the use of words such as \"pussy\" and \"cunt\" are simply uncalled for and very offensive to many, including me really feel that language such as this is very degrading to women.\" (J.A. at 101.) MacQueen went on to inform Plaintiff that \"[a]lthough do not know the context in which these words are used am concerned that your use of such language in the classroom will give rise to a claim of sexual harassment on the theory that this language creates a hostile learning environment for women. Simple knowledge of your past use of this language places the College under a legal duty to investigate whether you are creating a hostile learning environment.\" (J.A. at 101.) Accordingly, a meeting was scheduled with Plaintiff, his representative, and MacQueen, Dr. Ruth Reed, James Van Eman (the College's General Counsel), and Margaret MacTavish (the College's Affirmative Action Officer), for February 26, 1998 to investigate the matter. 1 uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Plaintiff agreed to the meeting and defended his use of such language. Plaintiff maintained that none of the terms at issue were directed to a particular student and were only used for demonstrating an academic point. Plaintiff claimed that he used the terms to \"point out the chauvinistic degrading attitudes in society that depict women as sexual objects, as compared to certain words to describe male genitalia, which are not taboo or considered to be deliberately intended to degrade.\" (J.A. at 30.) The February 26, 1998, investigation concluded with MacQueen issuing a warning to Plaintiff via a memorandum dated March 4, 1998, entitled \"Obscene and vulgar speech,\" which states in relevant part: This memorandum will confirm my verbal warning to you concerning your use of obscene and vulgar language in the classroom. . . . Unless germane to discussion of appropriate course materials and thus a constitutionally protected act of academic freedom, your utterance in the classroom of such words as 'fuck,' 'cunt,' and 'pussy' may serve as a reasonable basis for concluding as a matter of law that you are fostering a learning environment hostile to women, a form of sexual harassment. Federal and state law imposes a duty on the College to prevent the sexual harassment of its students and therefore requires that the College Page 804 discipline you if it finds that you have created a hostile environment. The principle of academic freedom under the 1st Amendment serves to protect the utterances in question only if they are germane to course content as measured by professional teaching standards. Since the precise frontier between academic freedom and sexual harassment remains to be defined by the courts case by case, a teacher of English literature or composition courses may be able to find safety and comfort under the 1st Amendment only if the words uttered are found in appropriate textual materials and the utterances are pertinent to discussion of those materials. Beyond this point, the teacher enters uncharted territory and proceeds at his or her own risk of being found guilty of sexual harassment. Consequently, you are warned that a general use in the classroom of words like 'fuck,' 'cunt,' and 'pussy' outside a professional exegesis may compel the conclusion that you are creating a hostile learning environment requiring disciplinary action. (J.A. at 102.) About eight months later, in November of 1998, a female student enrolled in Plaintiff's English 122 class, and filed a written \"sexual harassment\" complaint with the College (\"the Complaint\"), claiming that Plaintiff's classroom language constituted sexual harassment. (J.A. at 230.) The Complaint states in relevant part: This is a letter of formal complaint against Professor John Bonnell am currently a student in Mr. Bonnell's class, English 122 from 8-9:30 on Mondays and Wednesdays. My complaint against Mr. Bonnell is sexual harassment. . . . Beginning in middle to late September the atmosphere of the class started to change from comfortable to extremely offensive. Mr. Bonnell began using lude [sic] and obscene comments. These comments stemmed from English stories that we were reading in class, and he decided to add his own personal comments. These comments were dehumanizing, degrading, and sexually explicit. Some of the stories that were required reading revealed sexual innuendoes and implications. This should have been dealt with in a professional and appropriate manner, yet Mr. Bonnell displayed a lack of maturity, sensitivity, and responsibility, by taking advantage of the conversations to express his own previous sexual experiences. If this class had been a psychology or human sexuality class might have understood more of why sex was the major content of our class. This was supposed to be an English class and feel cheated out of my money because paid tuition to learn English did not pay to hear about Mr. Bonnell's sexual escapades feel that he also used his teacher position as a platform for authority to intimidate his students not to complain about him. Mr. Bonnell repeatedly made fun of students who had expressed offense or disgust and he also laughed at them. This is one of the reasons why did not come forward sooner feel compelled to speak up now so as to save further embarrassment to Macomb Community College. I, as a student, and as a wife have been strongly affected mentally and emotionally due to the sexual harassment from Mr. Bonnell. My husband and are fully prepared to take this sexual harassment complaint to the highest level of authority it can go uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 To continue reading Request your trial My goals of filing this complaint is [sic] to, at the very least, receive credit for English 122, and a written apology from Mr. Bonnell also would like Mr. Bonnell to be dismissed from the college immediately. Mr. Bonnell also needs to go to a counselor to discuss his sexual problems would also like Mr. Bonnell to be denied all access to my and my husbands [sic] social security numbers, student accounts, address, and telephone numbers expect and demand that this sexual harassment be taken seriously Page 805 and given top priority. Thank you for acting immediately and swiftly in this matter. (J.A. at 230.) As a result, Gus J. Demas, Dean of Arts and Science at the College, scheduled a meeting with Plaintiff to further investigate the matter, and also provided Plaintiff with a copy of the Complaint. Plaintiff made copies of the Complaint and passed them out to the students in all six of his classes after redacting the complaining student's name, and also posted a copy of the Complaint on the bulletin board outside of his classroom. At a December 3, 1998, investigatory meeting uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 312 cases Search in 312 citing cases \uf014 Vitolo v. Guzman ( United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of Tennessee May 19, 2021 ... ... injunction, if it is found that a constitutional right is being threatened or impaired, a finding of irreparable injury is mandated.\" Bonnell v. Lorenzo , 241 F.3d 800, 809 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Elrod v. Burns , 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976) ). However, the ... ... Burns v. City of Detroit ( United States Court of Appeal of Michigan \u2014 District of February 4, 2003 ... ... In Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800, 820-821 (C.A.6, 2001), the court further explained this concept: ... Plaintiff may have a constitutional ... ... Bongo Prods v. Lawrence ( United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Middle District of Tennessee July 9, 2021 ... ... Bonnell v. Lorenzo , 241 F.3d 800, 809 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Elrod v. Burns , 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976) ). In addition to ... ... Alsaada v. City of Columbus ( United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Southern District of Ohio April 30, 2021 ... ... Because \"a constitutional right is being threatened or impaired, a finding of irreparable injury is mandated.\" Bonnell v. Lorenzo , 241 F.3d 800, 809 (6th Cir. 2001). 3. Balance of the Equities When considering the third factor, the balance of equities, a court ... ... Request a trial to view additional results 2 books & journal articles Search in 2 citing books & journal articles uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Free Speech and the Right to Offend: Old Wars, New Battles, Different Media ( books.vlex.com/vid/free-speech-and-the-935404429) United States Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 18-3, March 2002 Invalid date ...Suck!\" did not violate the student's constitutional rights). [234]. 478 U.S. 675 (1986). [235]. Id. at 685. [236]. Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 2001). [237]. Id. [238]. Gresham v. Peterson, 225 F.3d 899, 901 (7th Cir. 2000). [239]. Id. at 904. [240]. Id. at 906. [241]. Id dangerous mix: mandatory sentence enhancements and the use of motive. ( books.vlex.com/vid/dangerous-mix-sentence-enhancements-motive-56670126) United States Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 32 No. 3, May 2005 May 1, 2005 ...e.g., Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003); Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942). (124.) See generally Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2001) (balancing a professor's right to free speech against a university's interest in protecting its students from (125.) See City...... 1-800-335-6202 Terms of use ( \u00a92025 vLex.com All rights reserved uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041", "7419_104.pdf": "Search Home Archive Store An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause By John Bonnell - Aug 15, 2018 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 1/7 Editors Note: The following text was brought to my attention by Tyrant contributor and former student of John Bonnell (1940-2014), Sean Kilpatrick, who found it on a geocities site. After many attempts to write an introduction, all of which felt like too much or too little, I\u2019ve decided to just link the case in question\u2013which you can read about if you want\u2013here. (The geocities link also has an abundance of information about and surrounding the case.) The basics are that John Bonnell, professor of English at Macomb Community College, was suspended for three days after a student filed a complaint regarding his use of profane language in the classroom, during which time he distributed the following \u2018apology\u2019 to the complainant to his students and the media. He was consequently suspended for four months. * An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Young lady, before identifying the clause in the title, and as a preface to the apology you desire, let me review the two articles of impeachment which you have preferred against me. First, there is the one count of buttfucking; second, there are the three counts of blow-job. The first charge all by itself must confess, would inspire squeals of protest even from the most asinine, the most cheeky. The second charge, on the face of it, is more than your average mouthful marvel at your courage in bringing notice of these alleged outrages to the proper authority, and am amazed by the modest remedy you require. In short order was summoned before the college\u2019s highest tribunal where the grand inquisitor himself, with the support of sundry assistants, subjected me to rigorous cross-examination was not informed beforehand as to the specifics of this interrogation, apparently because the examiners were after the truth of the matter and probably felt that the element of surprise would tend more profitably to that end. Professors are rather like politicians: give them ample time to consider any question, they are apt to expatiate ad nauseam did know, because of your \u201cformal complaint,\u201d what the fundamental charge might be: sexual harassment. But, as that might be anything from gang rape by a branch of Hell\u2019s Angels to an indiscreet plucking at one\u2019s own wedgie couldn\u2019t imagine what witches\u2019 spew might be brewing. 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 2/7 Consider, Virginia, the second article of impeachment first. Had you voiced your exception to blow-job in class, two things would have occurred. First, you would have been given credit for class participation, according to our academic contract; second would have reminded you of the orientation announced on day one. To wit, however idiosyncratic it may seem take all of the English language as my medium or as an opportunity for scrutiny do not make \u201cpolitical\u201d or \u201cmoral\u201d or \u201csocial\u201d distinctions between one word, one phrase, and another will make note that others do, when such notation is instructive.) The only distinctions worthy of critical attention pertain to sense, or meaning, and thus to communication. (On rare occasions, where three or more students have expressed common discomfort have acceded to such a significant minority. The intent, after all, is to teach\u2013not to posture or to proselytize leave the subjective categories of \u201cobscene\u201d or \u201cprofane\u201d or \u201cvulgar\u201d to Goody Twoshoes and to the bizarrely schizoid courts. The latter understand that flag-burning is legitimate symbolic expression, and that neo-Nazis and racial supremacists must be allowed to voice their hatred. Violence is as homespun as Oklahoma City and Waco; we know how, and have a will, to protect our own. Try making allusions to sexual or other body flinctions? Let\u2019s hear how you sound, buddy, with your tongue torn out. Furthermore probably would have pointed out that \u201cblow-job\u201d is a euphemism, and an absurd one at that. There have been blow-jobs galore executed on campus nearly every day of this unseasonably mild autumn. Young men, with gasoline-fueled engines strapped to their backs, have repeatedly disrupted my daytime classes via the cacophonous blow-jobs they administer to the reverberating quadrangle. (Those who maladministrate this college apparently deem a tidy milieu more critical than intramural discussion or lecture. Perhaps we should indict those responsible: for \u201cenvironmental harassment,\u201d for perpetrating an aerial and auditory pollution far more egregious than any of my dynamic ejaculations. But there is little justice, Virginia, on this campus or in this world\u2013only officious straining at gnats whilst camels hump through.) Speaking of worldly injustice understand that my blow-jobs were peculiarly reprehensible, mayhap even criminal, because they were allusions to the spectacular entanglements of a William Jefferson Clinton and one Monica Lewinsky. What, the grand inquisitor wanted to know, could possibly adduce to justify the discussion of political science in an English class have subsequently been informed by students that at least two of our math professors also entertained this topic during class time. Mirabile dictu. Yet must concede, proliferation of crime does not absolve any isolated criminal.) It says, after all, in the cover letter to the college\u2019s \u201cRevised sexual harassment policy\u201d (July 30, 1997) that \u201cRegular use of profane, vulgar, or obscene speech in the classroom which is not germane to course content (and thus educational purpose) as measured by professional standards will lead to the imposition of discipline.\u201d But you see, Virginia, this sort of legalese is variantly known in the grown-up, adventitiously sane, world as bullshit. Profanity, vulgarity (I\u2019m especially fond of this one, since it ensnares virtually everyone in its aristo- anal-cratic web; look it up, and you\u2019ll see what mean. You will think: sump\u2019n\u2019 ain\u2019t right here,\u201d and you\u2019ll be right, and wrong, altogether.), and obscenity (this one\u2019s a doozy, too. \u201cInciting lustful feelings; lewd,\u201d is the 2 second definition. The other applications are reminiscent of \u201cvulgar.\u201d The only persons in my classes who are stirred, in any antisocial sense, by my diction are either the very unfortunately \u201cwired,\u201d on the one hand, or the very young, Virginia, on the other.)\u2013all these are in the eye of the beholder. That\u2019s why even so august a body as the U. S. Supreme Court has continually tied itself into comical knots trying to sort out the sordid, parse the putrid, and teet the totter. That which is \u201cgermane to course content\u201d is best left to the professional (more on \u201cacademic freedom\u201d later), while \u201cimposition of discipline\u201d is reserved for the amusement of inquisitors. Nevertheless was somewhat taken aback by this \u201cgermanity,\u201d and possibly failed to make the fullest explanation. That is, while the preponderance of my classroom time focuses on the \u201canalysis of the function of particular words, phrases, or images\u201d that appear in our texts don\u2019t want my students mistakenly presuming that such analytical skill is germane only to literature. You may recall that we also examined statements offered in the \u201cmedia\u201d or in other printed sources. For example, apropos the President and the Intern probably commented on a reporter\u2019s language early in September when she said: \u201cThe president was involved in another prickly face-off vis-a\u2019-vis the press this morning may well have pointed out that the cunning linguist who wrote this script failed to trip up the straight-faced journalist who had to deliver so slyly veiled an allusion 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 3/7 to fellatio. James Joyce, who flourished in an era almost as neurotic as our own, and who was a consummate word-smith enamored of pun and innuendo, would have loved this broadcast moment. By the bye, Virginia, you may be pleased to learn that fellatio is the preferred articulation of the grand inquisitor. He used this variant at least twice during cross-examination of my person. Fellatio, being Latin, is deader than Cleopatra\u2019s asp. When dragged into English dialogue, it constitutes a euphemism which does for communication what blurring does for lenses, what \u201csnow\u201d does for TV, what static does for radio. As such, it reminds one of William Faulkner\u2019s character Snopes, who\u2019d step on the gas pedal and the brake pedal at the same time, generating considerable noise but scant motion can recall my own mother posing ambiguities when she yelled at me: \u201cDon\u2019t touch that! That\u2019s ca-ca couldn\u2019t tell if she was referring to the dog turd on my right or the attractive, E-coli-free-but-used condom on my left. (Giving the latter a blow job was thrilled at how rapidly and easily it filled . . . . Years later, when she lay dying of colon cancer would irrigate her stoma betimes with my bare finger; it definitely was shit, but it wasn\u2019t ca-ca.) Wherever the grand inquisitor\u2019s pettifogging fellatio may have drified or tended, he might have been talking about sucking cock anyway. Hard to say am sorry, Virginia, that you find your own language, the English language, so painful. What about the other charge, that committed one buttfucking was invited to reconstruct the context for that one, that snappy trap, since it apparently didn\u2019t dovetail with the political \u201cdigression.\u201d I\u2019m depressed to admit stumbled here, too was more fascinated by the collective inquisitors\u2019 scribbling in reaction to my affirmative, my admission; and, though labored only vaguely remembered the circumstance. Now, however seem to recall that we\u2013the class\u2013were discussing the Greek word philia, and its multiple manifestations in modern English believe we covered \u201cphilosophy,\u201d love of wisdom; and \u201cPhiladelphia,\u201d love of the adelphoi, the brothers; and \u201cpedophile,\u201d love (\u201clove?!\u201d\u2013how absolutely absurd, we agreed) of children; and, finally, after several others, we wandered toward \u201cnecrophilia,\u201d love of death or, erotically, of the dead. Then, because assume am among adults who are students of life as well as of language, we talked about a notorious instance in Detroit some fifteen years ago wherein an Indian Village gardener murdered his girlfriend, buried her body on the estate grounds, then dug it up two weeks later and fucked the corpse\u2013because he was certain \u201cshe\u201d must have gotten lonely. To lighten things, after the gasps (no one regurgitated his or her supper on the floor, so presumed some of the gaspers were emulating one of my traits: reveling in the histrionic used a Sam Kinison skit for comic relief. You know, the one where he imagines he\u2019s a corpse lying face down in a mortuary cooler, chilling out, congratulating himself for having fought the good fight, noting the looming presence of, what, the mortician? Why is he pulling Sam\u2019s fantoid\u2019s pants down?! What\u2019s he-Oh no miss Sam, the ex rev(erend). Life can be such a pain in the ass. It takes comic genius to conjure: is death also am sorry if you didn\u2019t appreciate my Samitation (don\u2019t look that up; it\u2019s a neologism, same as \u201cfantoid\u201d before it. We\u2019re not supposed to indulge creative urges such as this unless we\u2019re famous. But, hell, I\u2019m pushing sixty, and legitimate license is eluding my grasp.) You know, Virginia, my very caring, very percipient wife, speculates that this is what flipped you out, that perhaps someone important to you had died not long before. Is that true? Literature and language, then, are my main concern, but analysis of same is not all teach. Analysis is very important\u2013but so is synthesis, the harmonizing of everything one is learning in formal situations such as the classroom with everything else that one has discovered\u2013with everything that one is Becoming. As often say (do you remember?), the characters that you meet in novels and stories and dramas and poems are not specimens on a Petri dish, remote, dissociated, unutterably alien. They are your kin; they are your reflection; they are you. The best artists are awesome gifts to us; Shakespeare, some say, is the finest psychologist who ever lived. Just so. And if you\u2019re not seeing your face in these mirrors, at least one of two things is true: you are not reading the literature very well, or, and this is far worse, you are not reading your own life very well. And there goes the Socratic challenge, his quintessential invitation: \u201cto lead the unexamined life is not fit for a human being.\u201d That Socratic test prods us to make every effort to raise to the fullness of consciousness all the forces and influences that have formed us, whether in the narrow confines of family or the broader world of friends and fellow citizens. Everything (including linguistic prejudices) we have learned, have found imprinted on our souls, is subject to review, regardless of source. Not the parent or the peer, not the preacher or the pedagogue, who has altered us is above scrutiny. Test all things, and only then hold fast to what seems true. We all start out as 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 4/7 figments of others\u2019 imaginations, stuck with a cluster\u2013usually contradictory\u2013of derivative beliefs, values, opinions, biases, and \u201cknee jerk\u201d behavior. The more ancient a personal modifier, the more suspect it is have believed thus-and-so all my life!\u201d exposes not some noble constancy but, rather, the squawk of the parrot. Having, being, merely such a borrowed persona, the Self is always vulnerable: every alien idea, every weird or wild word, shakes such selves to the prefabricated core. When we discuss, then, these masters\u2019 literary opera (that\u2019s a more charming plural\u2013don\u2019t you agree?\u2013than \u201copuses,\u201d which sounds like a disease, a suppurating sore; even dead Latin can sometimes afford us, the living, a chance to sing, a chance to play), you have observed that often include personal anecdotes, illustrations from my own life of Walter Mittyesque incompetence, of \u201cOpen Window\u201d-like coups laid upon stuffy adults, of Little Chandler- or Bob Doran-like sexual fear and sexual fumbling. (For some reason you only cited my \u201csexual escapades;\u201d weren\u2019t my nonsexual escapades interesting or memorable must try harder.) When recount such anecdotes, I, as is true of most fine teachers, am offering a species of \u201cmodeling,\u201d practicing what preach. See, student, this fictional jerk, buffoon, hypocrite, craven, etc., etc\u2013that was, hopefully no longer is, your teacher essay to make it safe for you to see your face, too. And many do can summon in fond memory those who\u2019ve said: \u201cThis is more like a class in psychology!\u201d or \u201ca class in philosophy!\u201d or \u201ca class in history!\u201d or \u201ca class in comparative religion!\u201d or \u201ca class in . . science\u201d is what wish someone someday will say. No one has, and the silence is eloquent. Because don\u2019t deserve better. But, you know\u2013well, only a very few could guess\u2013this is my darkest, deepest passion, to be a scientist expound on Shakespeare and Joyce, but dream about Galileo and Einstein. Go figure never could, math being my vanquishing dragon). Consider the most intriguing \u201cdefinition\u201d of humanity that have ever heard: we are the process of the sun becoming conscious of itself. There, fellow Milky Wayf\u2019er, is stuff enough to dream on for a googolplex of lifetimes am so very sorry, Virginia, that you find my language, the English language, so painful am also sorry that you grossly misrepresented an important aspect of our classroom experience: you allege that \u201cused [my] teacher position as a platform for authority to intimidate [my] students not to complain about [me]. Mr. Bonnell repeatedly made fun of students who had expressed offense or disgust and he also laughed at them. This is one of the reasons why did not come forward sooner.\u201d This reminds me of what David Schippers said to the other witch-hunters in congress today (Dec.10, 1998) about Clinton, that his lies were worse than mere lies \u201cbecause they were half-truths.\u201d You make it seem that there were actual students that you witnessed actually being mocked or ridiculed by me. Paradoxically, this one of your allegations is the most obnoxious (to me, not to the majority of administrators, who babble rhetoric about \u201cstudent needs\u201d and yet give neither fig nor rat\u2019s derriere for real students\u2019 interests except for the few who come sidling over with fashionable complaints), because it is the one so alien to my nature, to my habits of respect and nurturance for the people know am privileged to meet. It is true\u2013this is your half of a truth\u2013that talked about previous hassles with the college administration over some students \u201clining up\u201d (an obvious exaggeration for comic effect) at some dean\u2019s office to complain about the \u201cbad man\u201d with the \u201cpotty mouth.\u201d And, yes, a semester or more after the fact probably dismissed such folks (especially the cowards, the ones who never broach their disaffection in class or at any time to my face) with a gibe, a jeer, a hiss of derision tend to get a tad defensive when people don\u2019t just disagree with me, my values, my behavior, but who would also campaign for and delight in my utter destruction. Disagreement is fine welcome it and always remember to reward it. The clash of ideas and values is usually both exciting and illuminating. But have never \u201cdressed down,\u201d attacked, insulted, or ridiculed any actual student in any actual class. And you know that; you know there can be no corroboration for your arrant lie. (Shame on you, Virginia\u2013 so very young and yet so devious.) Much is made, at least by the grand inquisitor and his ilk, about the power a teacher has, the power to grade, the power to humiliate cannot speak for my colleagues, but know this to be a grave distortion where am concerned. Those few students who poise a knife at my back are, indeed, afraid of something, but it isn\u2019t I. What they fear is the wrath of their peers, their classmates\u2013other human beings put at risk, betrayed, by the craven treachery of one or, rarely, two. All their cowering behind the inquisitor\u2019s hooded robe cannot conceal this truth. 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 5/7 But, irony of ironies, because of the contract made with you at the commencement of the term, and because you\u2019d earned sufficient credit before demanding my head on a platter am morally obliged to record on your account a passing grade. It is as much my integrity, and none of your terrorist\u2019s tactics, which prospers you. Again, have actual students ever gotten uncomfortable in my classes? Certainly am not a \u201cpost-modernist,\u201d a flaky \u201crelativist\u201d who thinks any idea is just as wonderful as any other definitely do not respect lots of folks\u2019 beliefs, values, ideas, notions, prejudices, customs\u2013but, curiously enough do respect the people. As Pope John put it back in 1958: \u201cerror has no rights, but those who subscribe to the errors do horde of Catholics weren\u2019t happy, back then, with such a mealy-mouthed sentiment; they hankered for the consignment of all \u201cthem comm\u2019 nist bastards and hair- ticks\u201d to eternal flames, at least. They would have gleefully done to their enemies, Virginia, what you would do to me now. The only defense people such as have against people such as you is in your hands: my words. My language, my words. While broadly distinguishing between what call \u201cthe discourse of reason\u201d and \u201cthe discourse of passion take all language as my world, since the gradations between the antipodes are often so subtle. (This very apologia, you will perhaps notice, has a bit of reason amid the rush of passion. C\u2019est moi.) Sometimes, in a classroom become so enthused (en theos, the god within: beware, beware; his flashing eyes, his dancing hair!), so animated, so caught up in an exigent flow, the stream of words pours forth like molten gold that hopefully heats and informs as it dazzles\u2013or, at other times, tumbles and cools like a high waterfall. (I\u2019m also very modest.) If had to check this flow, constantly monitor its force or direction would be would have to become, a radically different, a wholly diffident, teacher. Sure can be, and often am, the calm pedagogue, precisely measuring out the cadences appropriate to pure reason. But if had to be that always, a very important part of me would die. (The only way the inquisitors of the world can ever ensure \u201cgermaneness,\u201d good Germaneness, is when all the classes are on-line. There\u2019ll be no messy spontaneity then, in their dreary Dystopia.) It\u2019s to avoid such death, to withhold \u201cthe chilling effect\u201d of self- censorship, that our culture has evolved the practice of \u201cacademic freedom.\u201d This is not some bonus, some perk designed to comfort teachers. And its bestowal does not depend upon the pleasure of administrators or colleagues. It exists, rather, for the benefit of students, your colleagues, your peers. They require authentic, truthful guides, mentors, sources\u2013to question, to push against, to grow with. And one day, hopefully, to rise far above. This can\u2019t happen with robots, with company men, with even the very best of good Germans. So, then to conclude this my apologia am sorry, almost ineffably sorry, that you find our language, the English language, so painful. You will never have the power, of course, to restrict it, or to kill part of it as you wish. Nor am possessed of the tongue of men and of angels, so as to protect it from you or all the tribe of its detractors. It will continue to wend its way and may even find complete vindication, one day, from its shaky jurisprudential custodians will probably not see that day, as it lies somewhere beyond the frenetic millennial epoch. But you may. Hopefully, by then, you will have learned to appreciate it. Maybe, then, you will understand that life without the fullness of your language\u2019s energy would be like that life Khalil Gibran says languishes without love: life where you may still laugh, but not all of your laughter; where you may still cry, but not all of your tears. Oh!\u2013the sanity clause! Virginia almost forgot! Here it is: \u201cCongress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . .\u201d This has driven the thought police, the language censors, and all deputy inquisitors beyond despair, into madness. If had access to your Christmas stocking would stuff it there. When, at length, you grow up, you will cherish it above every other gift, save love itself. Cheers. 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 6/7 _____ Previous post Roadkill Next post Mighty Fine Hat \u00a9 Copyright 2025 New York Tyrant. All Rights Reserved. [email protected] 2/22/25, 10:22 An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a sanity clause. by John Bonnell Tyrant 7/7", "7419_105.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Bonnell v. Lorenzo United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Mar 1, 2001 241 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2001) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Meet CoCounsel, pioneering that\u2019s secure, reliable, and trained for the law. Try CoCounsel free No. 99-2047. Argued: February 4, 2000. Decided and Filed March 1, 2001. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Paul D. Borman, J. *801 801 Juan A. Mateo (briefed), James C. Howarth (argued and briefed), Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. Gerald K. Evelyn (briefed), Detroit, MI, for Amicus Curiae. Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Summaries Case details 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/47 CLAY, Circuit Judge. Hunter L. Wendt (argued and briefed), Mt. Clemens, MI, Thomas P. Brady (briefed), Jeffrey A. Steele (briefed), Brady Hathaway, Detroit, MI, Timothy S. Ferrand (briefed), Cummings, McClorey, Davis Acho, Roseville, MI, for Defendants-Appellants. Mark H. Cousens, Southfield, MI, pro se. Donald J. Mooney, Jr. (briefed), Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan Aronoff, Cincinnati, OH, for Amicus Curiae. Before: NELSON, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges. CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., joined. NELSON, J., (pp. 827-28), delivered a separate concurring opinion. *802 802 Defendants, Albert Lorenzo, William MacQueen, and Gus J. Demas, appeal from the order granting Plaintiffs, John C. Bonnell and his wife Nancy L. Bonnell, injunctive relief as to Defendants' disciplinary suspension of John Bonnell from his teaching position at Macomb Community College (\"the College\"), in this case brought by Plaintiffs for, among other things, violation of John Bonnell's civil rights under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 and \u00a7 1985. This case presents us with the difficult task of balancing the precious First Amendment rights of a professor in the academic setting, against the legal obligation of a college to guarantee the rights of students to learn in an environment free of sexual harassment and hostility. Mindful of the significant import of the respective interests involved, we conclude that the balance tips in favor of the College such that the district court erred in granting the extraordinary relief of a preliminary injunction under the specific facts of this case. We therefore the district court's order 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/47 Plaintiff has taught English Language and Literature at the College since the Fall of 1967. Plaintiff is a member of the Macomb Community College Faculty *803 Organization (\"MCCFO\") and is employed pursuant to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (\"CBA\"). 803 1 1 We shall make reference to \"Plaintiff\" in the singular throughout this opinion, inasmuch as John Bonnell is the Plaintiff against whom disciplinary action was taken, while Plaintiff Nancy Bonnell's claims are all derivative of John Bonnell's claims. Defendant Albert Lorenzo is being sued individually and as President of the College; Defendant William MacQueen is being sued individually and as Vice President for Human Resources at the College; Defendant Gus J. Demas is being sued individually and as Dean of Arts and Science at the College; Defendant Mark Cousens is an attorney for the College's union, Macomb Community College Faculty Organization, and is not a party to this appeal. In a memorandum dated February 19, 1998, entitled \"Obscene and vulgar language in classroom,\" MacQueen informed Plaintiff that the parent of one of Plaintiff's students (not the complainant in the instant case) had filed a letter of complaint against him based upon a handout that Plaintiff had circulated to the members of his class. The handout, entitled \"My Semester Overview,\" is actually a review of Plaintiff's class prepared by one of Plaintiff's former students in 1991. The handout, as quoted in the memorandum, states as follows: \"Next, the language that was used during the first four weeks or so of class, in my opinion, was very inappropriate and distasteful. Never before have encountered an English teacher who used the word \"fuck\" so openly and so frequently in a classroom discussion. In addition, the use of words such as \"pussy\" and \"cunt\" are simply uncalled for and very offensive to many, including me really feel that language such as this is very degrading to women.\" (J.A. at 101.) MacQueen went on to inform Plaintiff that \"[a]lthough do not know the context in which these words are used am concerned that your use of such language in the classroom will give rise to a claim of sexual harassment on the theory that this language creates a hostile learning 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/47 environment for women. Simple knowledge of your past use of this language places the College under a legal duty to investigate whether you are creating a hostile learning environment.\" (J.A. at 101.) Accordingly, a meeting was scheduled with Plaintiff, his representative, and MacQueen, Dr. Ruth Reed, James Van Eman (the College's General Counsel), and Margaret MacTavish (the College's Affirmative Action Officer), for February 26, 1998 to investigate the matter. Plaintiff agreed to the meeting and defended his use of such language. Plaintiff maintained that none of the terms at issue were directed to a particular student and were only used for demonstrating an academic point. Plaintiff claimed that he used the terms to \"point out the chauvinistic degrading attitudes in society that depict women as sexual objects, as compared to certain words to describe male genitalia, which are not taboo or considered to be deliberately intended to degrade.\" (J.A. at 30.) The February 26, 1998, investigation concluded with MacQueen issuing a warning to Plaintiff via a memorandum dated March 4, 1998, entitled \"Obscene and vulgar speech,\" which states in relevant part: This memorandum will confirm my verbal warning to you concerning your use of obscene and vulgar language in the classroom. . . . Unless germane to discussion of appropriate course materials and thus a constitutionally protected act of academic freedom, your utterance in the classroom of such words as `fuck,' `cunt,' and `pussy' may serve as a reasonable basis for concluding as a matter of law that you are fostering a learning environment hostile to women, a form of sexual harassment. Federal and state law imposes a duty on the College to prevent the sexual harassment of its students and therefore requires that the College *804 discipline you if it finds that you have created a hostile environment. 804 The principle of academic freedom under the 1st Amendment serves to protect the utterances in question only if they are germane to course content as measured by professional teaching standards. Since the precise frontier between academic freedom 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/47 and sexual harassment remains to be defined by the courts case by case, a teacher of English literature or composition courses may be able to find safety and comfort under the 1st Amendment only if the words uttered are found in appropriate textual materials and the utterances are pertinent to discussion of those materials. Beyond this point, the teacher enters uncharted territory and proceeds at his or her own risk of being found guilty of sexual harassment. Consequently, you are warned that a general use in the classroom of words like `fuck,' `cunt,' and `pussy' outside a professional exegesis may compel the conclusion that you are creating a hostile learning environment requiring disciplinary action. (J.A. at 102.) About eight months later, in November of 1998, a female student enrolled in Plaintiff's English 122 class, and filed a written \"sexual harassment\" complaint with the College (\"the Complaint\"), claiming that Plaintiff's classroom language constituted sexual harassment. (J.A. at 230.) The Complaint states in relevant part: This is a letter of formal complaint against Professor John Bonnell am currently a student in Mr. Bonnell's class, English 122 from 8- 9:30 on Mondays and Wednesdays. My complaint against Mr. Bonnell is sexual harassment. . . . Beginning in middle to late September the atmosphere of the class started to change from comfortable to extremely offensive. Mr. Bonnell began using lude [sic] and obscene comments. These comments stemmed from English stories that we were reading in class, and he decided to add his own personal comments. These comments were dehumanizing, degrading, and sexually explicit. Some of the stories that were required reading revealed sexual innuendoes and implications. This should have been dealt with in a professional and appropriate manner, yet Mr. Bonnell displayed a lack of maturity, sensitivity, and responsibility, by taking advantage of the conversations to express his own previous sexual experiences. If this class had been a psychology or human sexuality 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/47 class might have understood more of why sex was the major content of our class. This was supposed to be an English class and feel cheated out of my money because paid tuition to learn English did not pay to hear about Mr. Bonnell's sexual escapades feel that he also used his teacher position as a platform for authority to intimidate his students not to complain about him. Mr. Bonnell repeatedly made fun of students who had expressed offense or disgust and he also laughed at them. This is one of the reasons why did not come forward sooner feel compelled to speak up now so as to save further embarrassment to Macomb Community College. I, as a student, and as a wife have been strongly affected mentally and emotionally due to the sexual harassment from Mr. Bonnell. My husband and are fully prepared to take this sexual harassment complaint to the highest level of authority it can go. My goals of filing this complaint is [sic] to, at the very least, receive credit for English 122, and a written apology from Mr. Bonnell also would like Mr. Bonnell to be dismissed from the college immediately. Mr. Bonnell also needs to go to a counselor to discuss his sexual problems would also like Mr. Bonnell to be denied all access to my and my husbands [sic] social security numbers, student accounts, address, and telephone numbers expect and demand that this sexual harassment be taken *805 seriously and given top priority. Thank you for acting immediately and swiftly in this matter. 805 (J.A. at 230.) As a result, Gus J. Demas, Dean of Arts and Science at the College, scheduled a meeting with Plaintiff to further investigate the matter, and also provided Plaintiff with a copy of the Complaint. Plaintiff made copies of the Complaint and passed them out to the students in all six of his classes after redacting the complaining student's name, and also posted a copy of the Complaint on the bulletin board outside of his classroom. At a December 3, 1998, investigatory meeting, MacQueen warned Plaintiff about disseminating the Complaint inasmuch as it is the College's policy that all student complaints be kept confidential. However, Plaintiff did not heed 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/47 MacQueen's warning and instead distributed copies of the Complaint to the more than two hundred College faculty members; attached to each copy of the Complaint was an eight-page satirical essay entitled \" An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause\" (\"the Apology\") written by Plaintiff in response to the complaining student's sexual harassment Complaint. (J.A. at 232.) Another meeting was held on December 18, 1998, which led to Demas issuing a memorandum to Plaintiff on January 5, 1999, entitled \"Disciplinary suspension,\" which informed Plaintiff that he was suspended for three days, commencing February 1, 1999 and ending February 3, 1999. (J.A. at 108.) The memorandum provides as follows: This memorandum is submitted as a statement of my finding that you used vulgar and obscene language without reference to assigned readings in your English 122 class during the fall 1998 term. Specifically find: 1. You made it a practice (as announced to the class at the start of the term) to swear in the classroom, using such words as `shit,' `damn,' `fuck,' and `ass.' 2. In relating a newspaper account of an act of necrophilia, you said that one doesn't expect to receive a serious `buttfucking' after being dead for two weeks. 3. In discussing President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky, you said that he received a `blow job' from her. This term was used by you twice. 4. You remarked two or three times that \"tits on a nun are as useful as balls on a priest.\" In September, 1993 all faculty were informed that discipline will be imposed for the gratuitous and regular use of vulgar or obscene language in the classroom. In February, 1996 all faculty were informed that classroom speech is insulated from the College's sexual harassment policy only if it is germane to course content as measured by professional standards. In July, 1997 all faculty were 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/47 *806 (J.A. at 231 (alterations in original).) informed that the \"regular use of profane, vulgar, or obscene speech in the classroom which is not germane to course content (and thus educational purpose) as measured by professional standards will lead to the imposition of discipline.\" In March, 1998, you alone were warned that \"the principle of academic freedom under the First Amendment serves to protect the utterance [of words `fuck,' `cunt,' and `pussy'] only if they are germane to course content as measured by professional standards and that general use in the classroom of [these words] outside a professional exegesis may compel the conclusion that you are creating a hostile learning environment requiring disciplinary action.\" In view of these warnings and the defiance you have expressed in face of them, you are to be suspended from your teaching duties without pay for three days, commencing February 1, 1999 and ending February 3, 1999. 806 2 2 The memorandum bears the erroneous date of January 5, 1998, instead of January 5, 1999. On January 8, 1999, after becoming aware of Plaintiff's dissemination of the Complaint and other materials such as the Apology, MacQueen issued a memorandum to Plaintiff entitled, \"Discussion of student complaints,\" which reads as follows: Please be advised that the administration is aware of the distribution to faculty of your paper titled \"An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause\" and intends to determine the extent of and means used in the distribution. Because your posting, distribution and discussion of student complaints of sex harassment or your use of obscene or vulgar language conveys the message that complaining students may be expected to be ridiculed by you and ostracized by their classmates, and thus may be deterred from complaining, you are hereby directed not to post, distribute, or discuss verbally or in writing (inside or outside the classroom) specific complaints filed by one or more of your students against you regarding sex harassment or 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/47 your use of obscene or vulgar language, or such complaints against you generally, with any person enrolled in one or more of your classes unless written permission has been granted by Dr. Rose Bellanca upon application of your union or attorney. This prohibition extends to discussion of any disciplinary action which has or may be taken against you. (J.A. at 240.) In response to this directive, Plaintiff provided a copy of the redacted Complaint and the Apology to local television Channels 4 and 50, as well as to The Macomb Daily local newspaper, and also informed the students in his class that he had been suspended for three days. On the days of Plaintiff's suspension, nearly every student in all five of his classes did not attend class despite the fact that a substitute teacher was there to take Plaintiff's place. However, the students pre-signed attendance sheets indicating that they supported Plaintiff and were protesting his suspension. 3 3 The district court duly noted that Defendants eventually divulged the complaining student's identity, with her permission; but that occurred only after Plaintiff distributed the student's redacted Complaint without her permission in violation of the College's policies. On February 2, 1999, MacQueen notified Plaintiff that he was suspended with pay and benefits pending an investigation into Plaintiff's actions such as disseminating the Complaint to the news media, because such actions \" [are] or may be causally related to disruption of the educational process.\" (J.A. at 340.) Thereafter, Plaintiff filed the instant suit. In response to the disciplinary action taken by Defendants, Plaintiff filed a six-count complaint against Defendants on March 10, 1999. Count alleged that Defendants conspired to violate Plaintiff's civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1985 and \u00a7 1983; Count alleged that Defendants violated Plaintiff's First Amendment rights to free speech and association, Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and equal protection of the law; Count alleged that Defendants were grossly negligent in violating Plaintiff's civil rights; Count sought a temporary restraining order to enjoin Defendants from enforcing their disciplinary 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/47 suspension of Plaintiff; Count alleged negligence and breach of the duty of fair representation against Defendant Mark Cousens in failing to represent Plaintiff as legal counsel on behalf of the union; and Count alleged loss of consortium. Plaintiff later amended the complaint to add the pendent state law claim of breach of contract against the Board of Trustees of the Community College District of the County of Macomb. Plaintiff also filed a motion for a preliminary *807 injunction requesting his immediate reinstatement to his teaching position at the College. 807 The district court initially denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and remanded the matter to the College for an administrative hearing. Defendant William MacQueen, Vice President for Human Resources, presided over the May 25, 1999, hearing and on June 7, 1999 issued a memorandum finding \"reasonable cause to believe that [Plaintiff] . . . violated Federal and Michigan law, College policies and directives, and the collective bargaining agreement between and the College. In addition, there is reasonable cause to believe that you contributed improperly to the disruption of the educational process in your classes.\" (J.A. at 314.) The memorandum, entitled \"Notice of charges,\" went on to specifically charge Plaintiff with 1) insubordination; 2) breach of confidentiality; 3) retaliation; and 4) disruption of educational process. Id. The memorandum concluded by informing Plaintiff that he was entitled to a hearing: Since a finding that you committed any of the violations alleged above (including disruption of the educational process) may lead to the imposition of discipline, you are entitled to a hearing before Dr. Rose Bellanca[, Provost,] at which you, your attorneys, and/or may present evidence or argument in opposition to a conclusion that you committed them or that disciplinary action should be taken. Please have your attorneys or representative inform Thomas P. Brady by June 18, 1999 whether you wish a hearing. If a hearing is not requested, Dr. Bellanca will proceed to a determination of these charges. (J.A. at 316.) Plaintiff declined the invitation for a further hearing. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/47 Subsequently, on July 9, 1999, Dr. Bellanca issued a memorandum to Plaintiff, entitled \"Disciplinary Suspension,\" wherein Dr. Bellanca rendered her findings regarding the charges brought against Plaintiff, and concluded that Plaintiff \"breached confidentiality and retaliated against the complaining student.\" Dr. Bellanca went on to state that the College was imposing the following disciplinary action for Plaintiff's conduct: As a result of your disruption of the educational process, you are hereby reprimanded and warned that any future actions which contribute to the disruption of the educational process at the College will subject you to further discipline. * * * * * * As a result, the College finds you were insubordinate under the January 8 directive, and in light of the previous three-day disciplinary suspension which was issued to you, you are hereby suspended from your duties without pay for a period of fourteen calendar days, commencing August 18, 1999, and ending August 31, 1999. Your fringe benefits will remain in place during the period of this suspension. * * * * * * The College, therefore, finds you breached confidentiality and retaliated against the complaining student. In determining the appropriate discipline to be imposed for these offenses, the College has looked to the \"Guidance\" published by the Office of Civil Rights within the U.S. Department of Education and to case law. The Guidance states that the school should tell the complainant that Title prohibits retaliation and that, if she or he is afraid of reprisals from the alleged harasser, the school will take steps to try to prevent retaliation and will take strong responsive actions if retaliation occurs. The College tried to prevent further retaliation by its directive to you of January 8, 1999, which you ignored. The College now feels obliged to take strong responsive action. Case law supports actions as severe as termination as being appropriate for breach of confidentiality. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/47 *808 808 The College gave serious consideration to terminating your employment effective immediately. However, in deference to your length of service with the institution, and in the belief that rehabilitation is still possible, the College has decided upon a suspension instead. Therefore, you are hereby suspended from your duties without pay for the four months of the Fall 1999 semester, commencing August 18, 1999 and ending December 18, 1999. This suspension will run concurrent with the fourteen day suspension issued for insubordination. In anticipation of your return to work in the Spring semester, your fringe benefits will remain in effect during the period of this suspension. (J.A. at 425 (emphasis added).) In response, Plaintiff filed a renewed emergency motion for preliminary injunction, upon which the district court heard testimony and oral argument on July 15 and 30, and August 3 and 19, 1999. On August 27, 1999, the district court issued its memorandum opinion and order granting Plaintiff's renewed motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff returned to his teaching position at the College on August 30, 1999. Shortly after Plaintiff's return to the College, another student filed a complaint regarding Plaintiff's alleged profanity and offensive language used in the first night of class; his alleged denigration of the Jewish faith; and his alleged denigration of women. The student was so offended by Plaintiff's conduct, she demanded a full refund of her tuition for the class. The student stated that the only reason that she stayed throughout the entire class the first night was because she \"did not want to take the chance of being caught in the crossfire of someone's rage feeling of uneasy nervousness overcame me felt trapped in the room for fear of getting up and causing a scene where he might humiliate me all the more.\" (J.A. at 493-94.) The student opined that \"if you continue to employ this perverted man suggest that you put warning labels on all of the classes that he will be teaching . . . which state `extremely explicit language and sexual content' on the course list each semester.\" Id. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/47 Defendants now appeal from the district court's August 27, 1999, opinion and order granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and reinstating Plaintiff to his teaching position at the College.4 4 Plaintiff's period of suspension was over before this case was heard on appeal, despite the district court's issuance of the preliminary injunction; however, we find this matter justiciable in any event because the case involves an order \"capable of repetition yet evading review.\" S. Pac. Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515, 31 S.Ct. 279, 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911); see also Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 377, 99 S.Ct. 2898, 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979) (finding that a matter is not moot when \"the challenged action was in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and there was a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party would be subjected to the same action again A. Standard of Review \u2014 Preliminary Injunction preliminary injunction is an extraordinary measure that has been characterized as \"one of the most drastic tools in the arsenal of judicial remedies.\" Hanson Trust v Acquisition Inc., 781 F.2d 264, 273 (2d Cir. 1986); see also Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, 471 F.2d 872, 876 (6th Cir. 1972) (emphasizing that a preliminary injunction is the strong arm of equity which should not be extended to cases which are doubtful or do not come within well-established principles of law). We review the district court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction for an abuse of discretion while giving great deference to the district court's determination; however, our deference to the district court is not absolute. Mascio v. Pub. *809 Employees Ret. Sys., 160 F.3d 310, 312-13 (6th Cir. 1998). Which is to say, the injunction will be disturbed if the district court relied upon clearly erroneous findings of fact, improperly applied the governing law, or used an erroneous legal standard. See Blue Cross Blue Shield Mut. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'n, 110 F.3d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1997 finding is `clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.\" See United States v. United States Gypsum, Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). 809 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/47 With our review standard and the gravity of the relief in mind, we now address the district court's order in the case at hand granting Plaintiff injunctive relief. B. Analysis \u2014 Whether the District Court Properly Granted a Preliminary Injunction In exercising its discretion with respect to a motion for a preliminary injunction, a district court must give consideration to four factors: \"(1) whether the movant has a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2) whether the movant would suffer irreparable injury without the injunction; (3) whether issuance of the injunction would cause substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest would be served by issuance of the injunction.\" Rock Roll Hall of Fame Museum, Inc. v. Gentile Prods., 134 F.3d 749, 753 (6th Cir. 1998). Mascio, 160 F.3d at 312-13. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c) \"requires a district court to make specific findings concerning each of these four factors, unless fewer are dispositive of the issue.\" See In re DeLorean Co., 755 F.2d 1223, 1228 (6th Cir. 1985). In Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976), the Supreme Court held that when reviewing a motion for a preliminary injunction, if it is found that a constitutional right is being threatened or impaired, a finding of irreparable injury is mandated. In other words, the first factor of the four-factor preliminary injunction inquiry \u2014 whether the plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of succeeding on the merits \u2014 should be addressed first insofar as a successful showing on the first factor mandates a successful showing on the second factor \u2014 whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm. See id.; see also Connection Distrib. Co. v. Reno, 154 F.3d 281, 288 (6th Cir. 1998) (finding that \"[w]hen a party seeks a preliminary injunction on the basis of a potential violation of the First Amendment, the likelihood of success on the merits often will be the determinative factor\"); Deerfield Med. Ctr. v. City of Deerfield Beach, 661 F.2d 328, 338 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that if the constitutional right of privacy is either threatened or in fact being impaired, this mandates a finding of 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 14/47 irreparable injury). The district court erred in this regard because it considered the second preliminary injunction factor \u2014 whether Plaintiffs would suffer an irreparable injury without the injunction-first, claiming that this factor was dispositive. 1. Substantial Likelihood of Plaintiff Succeeding on His Civil Rights Claims Brought Against Defendants As a public employee, in order to establish a likelihood of success on his \u00a7 1983 claim that Defendants denied Plaintiff his First Amendment right to free speech, Plaintiff has to demonstrate that 1) he was disciplined for speech that was directed toward an issue of public concern, and 2) that his interest in speaking as he did outweighed the College's interest in regulating his speech. See Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147-50, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). The inquiry into whether Plaintiff's speech is entitled to protection under the First Amendment *810 as addressing a matter of public concern is a question of law for the court to decide. See Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378, 383 386 n. 9, 107 S.Ct. 2891, 97 L.Ed.2d 315 (1987). The inquiry into whether Plaintiff's interests in speaking outweigh the College's interests in regulating Plaintiff's speech is a factual determination conducted under the well known Pickering balancing test. See Pickering, 391 U.S. at 568, 88 S.Ct. 1731. If Plaintiff's interests in the prohibited speech outweigh the College's interests, then Plaintiff's First Amendment rights have been violated. See Dambrot v. Cent. Mich. Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1186 (6th Cir. 1995). If the First Amendment violation was a substantial or motivating factor in Defendants' disciplinary action against Plaintiff, Defendants may present evidence that they would have disciplined Plaintiff in the absence of his protected conduct. See Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 285, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). However, if Plaintiff's speech does not involve a matter of public concern, it is unnecessary for the court to scrutinize the reason for the discipline. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 103 S.Ct. 1684. 810 5 5 This inquiry remains the same whether the public employee was an untenured teacher. See Dambrot v. Cent. Mich. Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1185 (6th 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 15/47 Cir. 1995) (citing Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 92 S.Ct. 2694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972)). Many commentators have recently addressed the degree of protection that should be afforded speech in the college and university setting, particularly in reference to protected speech as it relates to the prohibition of sexual harassment under Title IX, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681. See, e.g., Lisa M. Woodward, Comment, Collision in the Classroom: Is Academic Freedom a License for Sexual Harassment?, 27 Cap. U.L.Rev. 667 (1999); Beverly Earle Anita Cava, The Collision of Rights and a Search for Limits: Free Speech in the Academy and Freedom from Sexual Harassment on Campus, 18 Berkeley J. Emp. Lab. L. 282 (1997); Arthur L. Coleman Jonathan R. Alger, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23 J.C. U.L. 91 (1996). Indeed, as one commentator has noted: 6 6 Title of the Education Amendments of 1972 was enacted to supplement the Civil Rights Act of 1964's ban on discrimination in the workplace, see Yusuf v. Vassar Coll., 35 F.3d 709, 714 (2d Cir. 1994), and requires that educational institutions that receive federal funds provide a learning environment free of sex discrimination, including sexual harassment. See 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681(a)(1), (8); (c). Courts have interpreted Title cases under Title standards. See, e.g., Brine v. Univ. of Iowa, 90 F.3d 271, 276 (8th Cir. 1996); Murray v. N.Y. Univ., 57 F.3d 243, 249 (2d Cir. 1995) (\"[I]n a Title case for gender discrimination based upon the sexual harassment of a student, an educational institution may be held liable under standards similar to those applied in cases under Title VII.\"); Mabry v. State Bd. of Community Colleges and Occupational Educ., 813 F.2d 311, 316-17 n. 6 (10th Cir. 1987). However, the Supreme Court has reserved the question as to whether Title actions are governed by Title standards. See Franklin v. Gwinnett County Pub. Sch., 503 U.S. 60, 65 n. 4, 112 S.Ct. 1028, 117 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992). Currently, a debate rages concerning the degree to which speech that is sexually or racially harassing is protected. And nowhere is that debate more heated than on university campuses, historically committed to unrestricted inquiry and exploring of ideas, yet morally obligated to promoting respect, and legally forbidden from permitting sexual harassment under Title and Title IX. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 16/47 18 J. Emp. LAB. L. at 283 (footnotes omitted). The Supreme Court has similarly recognized the unique protection afforded speech generally in the academic realm: Any word spoken, in class, in the lunchroom, or on the campus, that deviates from the views of another person may start an argument or cause a disturbance. But our Constitution says we must take this risk, Terminiello v. Chicago, *811 337 U.S. 1, 69 S.Ct. 894, 93 L.Ed. 1131 (1949); and our history says that it is this sort of hazardous freedom \u2014 this kind of openness \u2014 that is the basis of our national strength and of our independence and vigor of Americans who grow up and live in this relatively permissive, often disputatious, society. 811 In order for the State in the person of school officials to justify prohibition of a particular expression of opinion, it must be able to show that its action was caused by something more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint. Certainly where there is no finding and no showing that engaging in the forbidden conduct would `materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of a school,' the prohibition cannot be sustained. Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744, 749 (5th Cir. 1966). Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 508-09, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); see also Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 487, 81 S.Ct. 247, 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960) (\"The vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools.\"). In the matter at hand, although we ultimately agree with the district court that Plaintiff's speech was protected as addressing a matter of public concern, the district court made erroneous factual determinations and legally incorrect rulings in rendering its decision which should be noted for the record. Moreover, the district court erred when it found that Plaintiff's interests in speaking as he did outweighed the College's interests in prohibiting retaliation against students who file sexual harassment 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 17/47 complaints, maintaining the confidentiality of its students, maintaining a disruption-free environment, and maintaining its federal funding. a. Was Plaintiff's Speech Protected as Addressing a Matter of Public Concern? At this juncture, we turn to our analysis of Plaintiff's speech and why we find that a portion of the speech addresses a matter of public concern. Plaintiff's distribution of the Apology along with the student's sexual harassment Complaint to his students, fellow faculty members, and the media, as well as his use of classroom language considered to be obscene and not germane to the course content, are the acts of expression for which he was disciplined and thus are at issue here. See Johnson v. Lincoln Univ. of the Commonwealth Sys. of Higher Educ., 776 F.2d 443, 451 (3d Cir. 1985) (\"It is implicit in Connick that the court must examine each activity which the employee claims provided the actual motivation for his termination to see whether it `touch[es] . . . upon a matter of *812 public concern.'\") (quoting Connick, 461 U.S. at 149, 103 S.Ct. 1684) (alteration in Johnson). 7 8 812 7 The concurrence claims that there is an absence of clear guidance from the Supreme Court as to how Connick v. Myers is to be applied in a \"mixed speech\" case, and that the appropriate course of analysis is to simply assume that Plaintiff's speech was protected. However, contrary to this assertion, Connick v. Myers was itself a mixed speech case which in fact provides clear guidance. There, the Court looked at every act of expression, and only after concluding that one of the acts touched upon a matter of public concern, balanced the interests involved. See 461 U.S. at 146-49, 103 S.Ct. 1684. In doing so, the Court made note of its \"responsibility . . . to ensure that citizens are not deprived of fundamental rights by virtue of working for the government. . . .\" Id. at 147, 103 S.Ct. 1684. Accordingly, we would be remiss if we based our analysis upon assumptions rather than the true nature of Plaintiff's speech. See id. at 150, 103 S.Ct. 1684 (finding that \"the state's burden in justifying a particular discharge varies upon the nature of the employee's expression\"). 8 The district court failed to consider Plaintiff's classroom speech in the course of issuing the preliminary injunction; however, Plaintiff's classroom speech must be considered where the parties have raised the issue, and 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 18/47 where Plaintiff's classroom speech was precipitous of the Complaint and Plaintiff's resulting actions which led to the disciplinary measures. \"Whether an employee's speech addresses a matter of public concern must be determined by the content, form, and context of a given statement, as revealed by the whole record.\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 147-48, 103 S.Ct. 1684. Speech which can be \"fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community\" touches upon matters of public concern. See id. at 146, 103 S.Ct. 1684. Absent unusual circumstances, a public employee's speech dealing with \"matters only of personal interest\" is not afforded constitutional protection. See id. at 147, 103 S.Ct. 1684. However, mixed questions of private and public concern, where the employee is speaking both as a citizen as well as an employee, can be protected, see Kennedy v. Tangipahoa Parish Library Bd. of Control, 224 F.3d 359, 366 (5th Cir. 2000), such that \"if any part of an employee's speech, which contributes to the [disciplinary action], relates to a matter of public concern, the court must conduct a balancing of interests test as set forth in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).\" Rahn v. Drake Ctr., Inc., 31 F.3d 407, 412 (6th Cir. 1994); see also Connick, 461 U.S. at 147, 103 S.Ct. 1684 (finding that \"when a public employee speaks not as a citizen upon matters of public concern, but instead as an employee upon matters only of personal interest,\" no First Amendment protection is afforded to the speech); Johnson, 776 F.2d at 451 (finding that the fact that a statement evolves from a personal dispute does not preclude some aspect of it from touching upon matters of public concern). We find the case at hand to be a mixed speech case inasmuch as Plaintiff's speech at issue concerns both private as well as public matters. Stated otherwise, although aspects of Plaintiff's speech involve matters of personal interest where he is speaking regarding a personal grievance as an employee, his speech also involves matters of public interest such that Plaintiff is speaking as a concerned citizen. \"Mixed speech cases are perhaps the most difficult subset of employee speech cases to adjudicate. Because the employee admittedly speaks from multiple motives, determining whether she speaks as a citizen or employee requires a precise and factually-sensitive determination.\" Kennedy, 224 F.3d at 367. However, \"[w]hether an employee's statement is predominated by `the employee's personal interest qua 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 19/47 employee' is primarily a content-based inquiry, not an exclusively motive- based inquiry.\" Chappel v. Montgomery County Fire Prot. Dist. No. 1, 131 F.3d 564, 575 (6th Cir. 1997). In other words, \"`[t]he motive which underlies an employee's statements is a relevant, but not necessarily dispositive factor' when considering whether an employee's statements may be fairly characterized as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community.\" Id. at 576 (quoting Cliff v. Bd. of Sch. Comm'rs, 42 F.3d 403, 409 (7th Cir. 1994)). i. \"The Complaint\" One of the acts of expression for which Plaintiff was disciplined was his distribution of the sexual harassment Complaint lodged against him. Regarding the content of the Complaint, it is well-settled that allegations of sexual harassment, like allegations of racial harassment, are matters of public concern. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 103 S.Ct. 1684 (noting that \"it is clear that . . . statements concerning the school district's allegedly racially discriminatory policies involved a matter of public concern\") (citing Givhan v. W. Line Consol. Sch. Dist., 439 U.S. 410, 415-16, 99 S.Ct. 693, 58 L.Ed.2d 619 (1979)); Wilson v Health Ctr., 973 F.2d 1263, 1269 (5th Cir. 1992) (finding that \"reports of sexual harassment perpetrated on [the plaintiff] and other women at [the University of Texas Health Center] \u2014 is of great public concern\"); see also Perry v. McGinnis, *813 209 F.3d 597, 608 (6th Cir. 2000) (finding that because the plaintiff's complaint was for race discrimination, it inherently involved a matter of public concern). It is true that the plaintiff alleging a First Amendment violation is usually the person who lodged the sexual or racial harassment complaint, claiming that the employer retaliated against him for filing the complaint; while in the case at hand, it is the person against whom the complaint was made who is claiming a First Amendment violation. However, the lack of parallelism between Plaintiff in this case and the plaintiffs in other cases does not change the fact that the Complaint related to sexual harassment and therefore involves a matter of public import. 813 The context and form of Plaintiff's speech in this regard require further inquiry. Plaintiff's expression of circulating the sexual harassment Complaint came on the heels of his being called before the College to 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 20/47 answer to the allegations made by the complaining student regarding Plaintiff's classroom conduct. Although Plaintiff may have circulated the Complaint in the context of a heated dispute with the College and out of personal animus in retaliation against the complaining student, the fact remains that the context of his circulating the Complaint to faculty members, students, and the media is a matter of public concern where the public \u2014 particularly other students attending and planning to attend the College \u2014 certainly would be interested in learning the nature of the sexual harassment Complaint lodged against Plaintiff. See Moore v. City of Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 370-71 (5th Cir. 1989) (finding that the plaintiff's criticism of the fire department to the media addressed a matter of public concern, although the criticisms may have been borne out of the plaintiff's personal disagreement with the fire department's staffing problems, because the public was eager to hear about the ability of the fire department to perform its duties). Accordingly, we believe that Plaintiff's distribution of the Complaint involved a matter of public concern such that the act of expression was protected under the First Amendment. See id. The district court likewise found that Plaintiff's distribution of the redacted Complaint was protected as a matter of public concern inasmuch as the content, context, and form of the expression dealt with the issue of sexual harassment, and we do not take issue with the district court's findings or holding in this regard. However, the district court's factual findings regarding Plaintiff's distribution of the Apology presents a different case where, although the court ultimately reached the correct conclusion of law, the court's findings were clearly erroneous. ii. \"The Apology\" The district court could not be more incorrect when it found that \"[t]he entire eight page Yes, Virginia memorandum does not state that the student had filed a sexual harassment complaint against Bonnell, or even use the term sexual harassment. It is totally directed toward a discussion of the English language.\" (J.A. at 146.) One need look no further than the second paragraph of the Apology to find the term \"sexual harassment\" used, and the Apology opens in the first paragraph with a salutation to \"Young lady,\" \u2014 obviously in reference to the complaining student \u2014 as well as with a 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 21/47 reference to the apology that she sought from Plaintiff for his allegedly harassing conduct. (J.A. at 103.) Specifically, the Apology states as follows: Young lady, before identifying the clause in the title, and as a preface to the apology that you desire, let me review the two articles of impeachment which you have preferred against me. First, there is the one count of buttfucking; second, there are the three counts of blow-job. The first charge all by itself must confess, would inspire squeals of protest even from the most asinine, the most cheeky. The second *814 charge, on the face of it, is more than your average mouthful marvel at your courage in bringing notice of these alleged outrages to the proper authority, and am amazed by the modest remedy you require. 814 In short order was summoned before the college's highest tribunal where the grand inquisitor himself, with the support of sundry assistants, subjected me to rigorous cross-examination was not informed beforehand as to the specifics of this interrogation, apparently because the examiners were after the truth of the matter and probably felt that the element of surprise would tend more profitably to that end. Professors are rather like politicians: give them ample time to consider any question, they are apt to expatiate ad nauseam did know, because of your \"formal complaint,\" what the fundamental charge might be: sexual harassment. But, as that might be anything from gang rape by a branch of the Hell's Angels to an indiscreet plucking at one's own wedgie couldn't imagine what witches' spew might be brewing. (J.A. at 103 (emphasis added).) Indeed, contrary to the district court's finding, the Apology is explicitly directed toward the complaining student, as the salutation indicates and as the entire exposition reiterates. Throughout the entire eight-page Apology, Plaintiff continually refers to the complaining student as \"Virginia,\" and does so with mockery, disdain, and insults as to her immaturity in bringing the sexual harassment Complaint against Plaintiff. For example, Plaintiff states as follows on the fourth page of the Apology: 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 22/47 It is true \u2014 this is your half of a truth \u2014 that talked about previous hassles with the college administration over some students \"lining up\" (an obvious exaggeration for comic effect) at some dean's office to complain about the \"bad man\" with the \"potty mouth.\" And, yes, a semester or more after the fact probably dismissed such folks (especially the cowards, the ones who never broach their disaffection in class or at any time to my face) with a gibe, a jeer, a hiss of derision tend to get a tad defensive when people don't just disagree with me, my values, my behavior, but who would also campaign for and delight in my utter destruction. Disagreement is fine welcome it and always remember to reward it. The clash of ideas and values is usually both exciting and illuminating. But have never \"dressed down,\" attacked, insulted, or ridiculed any actual student in any actual class. And you know that; you know there can be no corroboration for your arrant lie. (Shame on you, Virginia \u2014 so very young and yet so devious). (J.A. at 106.) Also replete throughout the Apology is the phrase am sorry, Virginia, that you find your own language, the English language, so painful,\" again directed at the complaining student in reference to the fact that she filed a sexual harassment complaint against Plaintiff for his use of profanity which she found so offensive that it allegedly created a hostile learning environment. (J.A. at 104, 105, 107.) It is not until that last paragraph of the Apology that Plaintiff identifies the First Amendment, or as Plaintiff coins it, the \"sanity clause.\" (J.A. at 107.) Accordingly, the district court's finding that the Apology is \"totally directed toward a discussion of the English language\" is clearly erroneous where a review of the Apology on its face does not support this finding. Based upon its previous finding that the Apology never once mentions the term sexual harassment and is \"totally directed toward a discussion of the English language\" \u2014 the district court went on to find that \"[t]his indicates that Bonnell's motive in writing the Yes, Virginia memorandum was not to retaliate for a sexual harassment complaint, but instead to discuss First Amendment concerns in the context of classroom language.\" (J.A. at 147.) However, at the time of the preliminary injunction hearing, the district court ruled *815 that Plaintiff's motivation in writing the Apology was 815 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 23/47 MR. WENDT: Same objection. (J.A. at 699.) irrelevant and he refused to allow Plaintiff to be questioned regarding his motivation. Then, despite the court's finding to the contrary, in discerning Plaintiff's motive, the district court also found it \"important\" that at the time Plaintiff wrote the Apology, the Complaint had been decided in his favor. Apparently, the district court was of the opinion that because the outcome of the student's claim against Plaintiff had been decided in his favor, Plaintiff could not have been motivated by retaliation in writing the Apology. However, Plaintiff expressly states in the Apology that he was on the \"defensive\" because of the Complaint lodged against him, and Plaintiff expressly testified that at the time he wrote the Apology, he did not know the outcome of the sexual harassment Complaint. (J.A. at 107, 697.) Furthermore, Plaintiff could have sought to retaliate against the student and the College regardless of the actual outcome of the matter. 9 9 sampling of the colloquy provides as follows: Q. (to Plaintiff) Why did you write the document [the Apology]? MR. MATEO: They are saying retaliation. It is relevant for this witness who wrote the document to tell us why don't think it is relevant. The document speaks for itself will sustain the objection. The district court then based its conclusion of law that Plaintiff's Apology was protected under the First Amendment as a matter of public concern on its finding that Plaintiff's motive in writing the Apology was to discuss the First Amendment in the context of classroom language. However, as previously indicated, an employee's motivation in speaking is not dispositive as to whether the speech was protected, thereby making the district court's basis for its conclusion of law erroneous. See Chappel, 131 F.3d at 574 (finding that \"the argument that an individual's personal motives for speaking may dispositively determine whether that individual's speech addresses a matter 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 24/47 of public concern [to be] plainly illogical and contrary to the broader purposes of the First Amendment\"). And, also as indicated, the district court refused to allow Plaintiff to be questioned as to his motive in writing and distributing the Apology on the basis that Plaintiff's motive was \"not relevant.\" Despite these erroneous factual findings and the erroneous legal premise upon which the court based its conclusion of law, we believe that the district court properly concluded that Plaintiff's speech was protected under the First Amendment because the Apology \u2014 although expressed as a satirical diatribe fraught with references to Plaintiff's personal disagreement with the student's characterization and reaction to his classroom language \u2014 addressed a matter of public concern. Regarding the content of the Apology, it is true that Plaintiff apparently crafted the title in response to the remedy sought by the complaining student; that he addresses the Apology to the complaining student, albeit under the pseudo-name \"Virginia\" in order to create a sarcastic spoof on the editorial, \"Yes, Virginia, There is a Santa Claus;\" and that he criticizes both the student and the sexual harassment Complaint that she filed against him, as well as the College's disciplinary measures taken in response to the Complaint, all in relation to the First Amendment-which Plaintiff describes as \"the Sanity Clause.\" While the content of the Apology appears to be a personal attack on the various parties involved, the content also addresses the College's sexual harassment policy as it relates to classroom language. For example, It says, after all, in the cover letter to the college's \"Revised sexual harassment policy\" (July 30, 1997) that \"Regular use of profane, vulgar, or obscene speech in the classroom which is not germane to course content (and thus educational *816 purpose) as measured by professional standards will lead to the imposition of discipline.\" 816 But you see, Virginia, this sort of legalese is variantly known in the grown-up, adventitiously sane, world as bullshit. Profanity, vulgarity (I'm especially fond of this one, since it ensnares virtually everyone in its aristo \u2014 analcratic web; look it up, and you'll see 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 25/47 what mean. You will think: \"sump'n' ain't right here,\" and you'll be right, and wrong, altogether.), and obscenity (this one's a doozy, too. \"Inciting lustful feelings; lewd,\" is the second definition. The other applications are reminiscent of \"vulgar.\" The only persons in my classes who are stirred, in any antisocial sense, by my diction are either the very unfortunately \"wired,\" on the one hand, or the very young, Virginia, on the other.) \u2014 all these are in the eye of the beholder. That's why even so august a body as the U.S. Supreme Court has continually tied itself into comical knots trying to sort out the sordid, parse the putrid, and teet the totter. That which is \"germane to course content\" is best left to the professional (more on \"academic freedom\" later), while \"imposition of discipline\" is reserved for the amusement of inquisitors. (J.A. at 103-04 review of the Apology also indicates that Plaintiff was speaking as a concerned citizen about the importance of the right to free speech under the First Amendment, and the need to protect that right in society. For example, Plaintiff wrote as follows: So, then to conclude this my apologia am sorry, almost ineffably sorry, that you find our language, the English language, so painful. You will never have the power, of course, to restrict it, or to kill part of it, as you wish. Nor am possessed of the tongue of men and of angels, so as to protect it from you or all the tribe of its detractors. It will continue to wend its way and may even find complete vindication, one day, from its shaky jurisprudential custodians will probably not see that day, as it lies somewhere beyond the frenetic millennial epoch. But you may. Hopefully, by then, you will have learned to appreciate it. Maybe, then, you will understand that life without the fullness of your language's energy would be like that life Khalil Gibran says languishes without love: life where you may still laugh, but not all of your laughter; where you may still cry, but not all of your tears. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 26/47 Oh! \u2014 the sanity clause! Virginia almost forgot! Here it is: \"Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. . . .\" This has driven the thought police, the language censors, and all deputy inquisitors beyond despair, into madness. If had access to your Christmas stocking would stuff it there. When, at length, you grow up, you will cherish it above every other gift, save love itself. Cheers. (J.A. at 107.) As noted at the outset of our analysis, the debate of constitutionally protected speech in the classroom setting \u2014 particularly as it relates to sexual harassment and a college's obligations under Title \u2014 is a heated one where the most learned of academic institutions struggle to find a common ground. Therefore, speech which sets forth the type of remarks that served as the catalyst to a sexual harassment complaint lodged against a college professor, and the professor's reaction thereto, is speech which can \"fairly be considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community.\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 147-48, 103 S.Ct. 1684. Said differently, the subject of profane classroom language which precipitates a sexual harassment complaint lodged against the instructor for his use of this language in relation to the First Amendment, as well as the sanctity of the First Amendment in preserving an individual's right to speak, involves a matter of public import. See Wilson, 973 F.2d at 1269. *817 Stated more broadly, there is a public interest concern involved in the issue of the extent of a professor's independence and unfettered freedom to speak in an academic setting. 817 The context and form of Plaintiff's circulation of the Apology was public in nature such that Plaintiff distributed the Apology to the College's more than two hundred faculty members as well as to two local television stations and a local newspaper, thereby bringing to light the subject of allegedly profane classroom language which led to the filing of a sexual harassment complaint. Although it is true that finding speech to be a matter of public concern does not turn on communication of the speech to the public, see Johnson v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 215 F.3d 561, 585 (6th Cir. 2000), and that a \"finding of public concern is . . . strengthened by the fact that the plaintiff did not solicit the 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 27/47 attention of the media, but simply responded to questions regarding the existing controversy,\" see Matulin v. Vill. of Lodi, 862 F.2d 609, 613 (6th Cir. 1988), we believe that Plaintiff's circulation of the Apology was in the context of bringing the issue to the fore as a matter of public interest. The district court found \u2014 by virtue of its own devices and not based upon Plaintiff's testimony \u2014 that Plaintiff's motivation, or the context in which he circulated the Apology, was to discuss the bounds of the First Amendment, which thereby rendered Plaintiff's speech a matter of public import. We have two concerns regarding the district court's assessment. First, as noted, a speaker's underlying motivation in expressing himself as he did, although relevant, is not dispositive of the issue of whether the act of expression addresses a matter of public concern. See Chappel, 131 F.3d at 574. Second, we do not believe that the record supports a finding that Plaintiff's motivation in circulating the Apology was necessarily only one of public interest. Based upon the nature of the Apology, one could conclude that Plaintiff was motivated by personal animus against the complaining student as well as against the College for its reaction to her Complaint, and that he circulated the Apology as a retaliatory gesture against these parties. Indeed, in the Apology Plaintiff states that until the formal Complaint had been lodged against him, he had ignored similar complaints made by students. In other words, until the formal complaint was filed and the College acted upon it, Plaintiff did not react to similar complaints made by students, suggesting that Plaintiff's reaction in this case was simply in response to his discontent with the College's discipline. However, even assuming that Plaintiff was motivated by personal animus in circulating the Apology, the fact remains that in doing so, he addressed a matter occurring at the college which was of public concern. In Perry v. McGinnis, this Court recently rejected the argument that because the plaintiff brought his race discrimination complaint in the context of an internal grievance with his employer, the complaint did not address a matter of public concern. See 209 F.3d at 608. The Perry Court noted that in Chappel we clarified that \"[t]he fundamental distinction recognized in Connick is the distinction between matters of public concern and matters only of personal 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 28/47 interest, not civic-minded motives and self-serving motives.\" Id. (citing Chappel, 131 F.3d at 575) (citing Azzaro v. County of Allegheny, 110 F.3d 968, 979 n. 5 (3d Cir. 1997) ( en banc)). Accordingly, the Perry Court went on to conclude that \"whether Perry's racial discrimination complaint was borne out of civic-minded motives or of an individual employment concern is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the subject of Perry's complaint was racial discrimination \u2014 a matter inherently of public concern, according to the Supreme Court.\" 209 F.3d at 608-09 (citing Connick, 461 U.S. at 148 n. 8, 103 S.Ct. 1684). And so it goes that in the case at hand, although Plaintiff may have circulated the Apology in the context of a self-serving motive, it nonetheless remains that *818 the subject of the Apology \u2014 classroom language by a college professor which led to the filing of a sexual harassment complaint by one of his students for which he was disciplined, all in relation to the First Amendment \u2014 inherently touches upon a matter of public concern. 818 We are further persuaded in this regard by the Fourth Circuit's opinion in Seemuller v. Fairfax County Sch. Bd., 878 F.2d 1578 (4th Cir. 1989). There, a high school physical education teacher alleged that his First Amendment rights were violated when he did not receive his wage step increase because he wrote a satirical letter to the school newspaper commenting on allegations of sex discrimination against female students by teachers in the physical education department. See id. at 1579. Specifically, the teacher was responding to a letter in the school newspaper which complained about \"a few male chauvinistic P.E. teachers.\" Id. Before the teacher's satirical response was published in the school newspaper, both the paper's faculty advisor as well as the school's principal read the letter and did not object to it. Id. In addition to being published in the school paper and distributed to the students at the high school, the letter was mailed to approximately 3,600 families in the school's community. Id. at 1580. After distribution, the principal informed the teacher that he had received complaints from the community, faculty members, and others. See id. The principal also stated that the teacher may receive a \"needs improvement\" rating in \"Professional Responsibility\" on his evaluation, and suggested that the teacher meet with the human relations committee and write a letter of apology to the newspaper. Id. The teacher complied on both measures. Id. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 29/47 However, in his performance evaluation, the teacher received the \"needs improvement\" rating, despite his letter of apology, and did not receive his wage step increase. Id. at 1580-81. The teacher filed suit alleging violation of his First Amendment rights. Id. The district court held for the school on the basis that the speech did not involve a matter of public concern, but the Fourth Circuit reversed. Id. at 1582. The Fourth Circuit found that the teacher's letter involved a matter of public concern because it addressed the issue of sex discrimination in the physical education department, or the treatment of females in school programs. Id. at 1583. Accordingly, it follows that Plaintiff's Apology, which addressed an allegation of sexual harassment, and therefore the treatment of females at the College, similarly addressed a matter of public concern. Moreover, in the case at hand, the Apology went one step further and addressed issues of public concern such as the sanctity of the First Amendment. iii. \"Classroom Language\" Finally, we turn to Plaintiff's classroom language which gave rise to the sexual harassment complaint and the disciplinary measures. The content of Plaintiff's language at issue is what the College terms profanity not \"germane to course content.\" See, e.g., March 4, 1998 Memorandum from MacQueen to Plaintiff *819 entitled \"Obscene and vulgar speech\" (cautioning Plaintiff that \"[u]nless germane to discussion of appropriate course materials and thus a constitutionally protected act of academic freedom, your utterance in the classroom of such words as `fuck,' cunt,' and `pussy' may serve as a reasonable basis for concluding as a matter of law that you are fostering a learning environment hostile to women, a form of sexual harassment\"). In other words, it was not the content of Plaintiff's speech itself which led to the disciplinary action; rather, it was the context and form in which Plaintiff used the speech \u2014 i.e., in the course of his teaching where the language was not germane to the course content \u2014 that the College found to be in violation of its sexual harassment policy. 10 819 10 The College's sexual harassment policy provides in relevant part: For purposes of this policy, the term \"sexual harassment\" means . . . unwelcome verbal . . . conduct or communication of a sexual nature when: . . . (b) Such conduct or communication has the 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 30/47 (J.A. at 355.) purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's employment or education by creating an intimidating, hostile, abusive, or offensive work or educational environment. This policy does not apply to speech protected by the Constitutions of the United States or the State of Michigan. The academic setting is distinct from the workplace in that wide latitude is required for professional judgment in determining the appropriate content and presentation of academic material. Thus, speech in the classroom which is germane to course content is not subject to this policy. Reasonable care must be exercised in applying this policy to avoid violation of 1st Amendment rights. The context in which a message is delivered is often the pivotal factor when determining whether the speech will be protected. As the Supreme Court recently opined: [T]he protection afforded to offensive messages does not always embrace offensive speech that is so intrusive that the unwilling audience cannot avoid it. Indeed, it may not be the content of the speech, as much as the deliberate verbal or visual assault, that justifies proscription. Even in a public forum, one of the reasons we tolerate a protestor's right to wear a jacket expressing his opposition to government policy in vulgar language is because offended viewers can effectively avoid further bombardment of their sensibilities simply by averting their eyes. Hill v. Colo., 530 U.S. 703, 120 S.Ct. 2480, 2489, 147 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Nearly a century before Hill was decided, Justice Holmes likewise opined that \"the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it was done. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that have all the effect of force.\" 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 31/47 See Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52, 39 S.Ct. 247, 63 L.Ed. 470 (1919) (citations omitted). The degree of protection afforded to a college professor's speech in the context of the classroom was addressed by the Fifth Circuit in Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583, 584-85 (5th Cir. 1986). There, the plaintiff was discharged from his teaching position at a college for his incessant use of profanity in the classroom. Id. In finding that the speech was not protected, the Fifth Circuit took into account the unique context in which a college professor speaks such that his students are a \"captive audience\" who may find themselves intimidated by the person who has the ability to pass upon them a poor grade. Specifically, in Martin the plaintiff teacher denigrated his students with profanity such as \"bullshit,\" \"hell,\" \"damn,\" \"God damn,\" and \"sucks,\" allegedly because the students had a poor attitude. The plaintiff brought a \u00a7 1983 claim against the college for violation of his First Amendment rights; the district court held that the plaintiff did not have a constitutionally protected right to use profanity in the classroom; and the Fifth Circuit agreed. See id. at 585. The Court held that the teacher's speech did not touch upon a matter of public concern because the profanity served only to reflect the teacher's attitude toward his students. Id. In connection with its holding, the Court recognized that the students were a \"captive\" audience, and that they \"paid to be taught and not vilified in indecent terms. . . .\" Id. at 586. In short, the Court held that the teacher's \"language is unprotected . . . because, taken in context, it constituted a deliberate, superfluous attack on a `captive audience' with no academic purpose or justification.\" Id. In Dambrot v. Central Michigan University, we relied upon the Fifth Circuit's decision in Martin when we held that the coach of a state university basketball team *820 did not engage in protected speech when he used the word \"nigger\" during a locker room session allegedly to motivate his basketball players. See 55 F.3d 1177, 1180 (6th Cir. 1995) (\"[Y]ou know we need to have more niggers on our team. . . . Coach McDowell is a nigger,. . . . Sand[er] Scott who's an academic All-American, a Caucasian said Sand[er] Scott is a nigger. He's hard nose, [sic] he's tough, et cetera.\"). The coach was discharged by the university for this speech and he filed suit alleging that his discharge violated the First Amendment. The district court granted the 820 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 32/47 university's motion for summary judgment and this Court affirmed. Relying upon Martin, the Court concluded as follows: The First Amendment protects the right of any person to espouse the view that a \"nigger\" is someone who is aggressive in nature, tough, loud, abrasive, hard-nosed and intimidating; someone at home on the [basketball] court but out of place in a classroom setting where discipline, focus, intelligence and interest are required. This same view has been and is held about African Americans by many who view the success of Black athletes as a result of natural athletic ability and the success of Black executives as the result of affirmative action. What the First Amendment does not do, however, is require the government as employer or the university as educator to accept this view as a valid means of motivating players. An instructor's choice of teaching methods does not rise to the level of protected expression. . . . The University has a right to disapprove of the use of the word \"nigger\" as a motivational tool just as the college in Martin was not forced to tolerate profanity. 55 F.3d at 1190-91 (citation omitted; emphasis added). The Dambrot Court also rejected the coach's argument that his speech was protected under the realm of \"academic freedom.\" 55 F.3d at 1188. \"The analysis of what constitutes a matter of public concern and what raises academic freedom concerns is of essentially the same character.\" Id. (citing Swank v. Smart, 898 F.2d 1247, 1250 (7th Cir. 1990)). The Court then noted that the \"linchpin of the inquiry is, thus, for both public concern and academic freedom, the extent to which the speech advances an idea transcending personal interest or opinion which impacts our social and/or political lives.\" To this end, the Court concluded that, unlike the case of Levin v. Harleston, 966 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1992), and Jeffries v. Harleston, 21 F.3d 1238 (2d Cir. 1994), vacated and remanded, 513 U.S. 996, 115 S.Ct. 502, 130 L.Ed.2d 411 (1994), rev'd 52 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 1995) \u2014 where the speech of college professors who made derogatory comments about persons of certain racial or ethnic groups was found to serve the purpose of advancing 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 33/47 viewpoints, however repugnant, which had as their purpose influencing or informing public debate \u2014 the coach's speech did not have such a purpose. Id. at 1189. Turning to the matter at hand, just as a university coach may have the constitutional right to use the word \"nigger,\" but does not have the constitutional right to use the word in the context of motivating his basketball players, see 55 F.3d at 1190; so too, Plaintiff may have a constitutional right to use words such as \"pussy,\" \"cunt,\" and \"fuck,\" but he does not have a constitutional right to use them in a classroom setting where they are not germane to the subject matter, in contravention of the College's sexual harassment policy. See id.; see also v. Pacifica Found., 438 U.S. 726, 747, 98 S.Ct. 3026, 57 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1978) (finding speech that is \"`vulgar,' `offensive,' and `shocking' . . . is not entitled to absolute constitutional protection under all circumstances\"). This is particularly so when one considers the unique context in which the speech is conveyed \u2014 a classroom where a college professor is speaking to a captive audience of students, see Martin, 805 F.2d at 586, *821 who cannot \"effectively avoid further bombardment of their sensibilities simply by averting their [ears].\" Hill, 120 S.Ct. at 2489. Although we do not wish to chill speech in the classroom setting, especially in the unique milieu of a college or university where debate and the clash of viewpoints are encouraged-if not necessary \u2014 to spur intellectual growth, it has long been held that despite the sanctity of the First Amendment, speech that is vulgar or profane is not entitled to absolute constitutional protection. See Pacifica, 438 U.S. at 747, 98 S.Ct. 3026. 821 To summarize, although we find Plaintiff's classroom profanity that was not germane to the subject matter to be unprotected speech, we are also of the belief that Plaintiff's acts of expression in circulating the Complaint and the Apology were protected as addressing matters of public concern. Because parts of Plaintiff's speech for which he was disciplined addressed a matter of public concern, we are required to conduct a balancing of the parties' respective interests as set forth in Pickering v. Board of Education. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 149, 103 S.Ct. 1684; Rahn, 31 F.3d at 411. b. Was Plaintiff's Interest as a Citizen in Speaking on a Matter of Public Concern Greater 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 34/47 than the College's Interest in Promoting the Efficiency of the Service that it Performs through its Employees? In Pickering, the Supreme Court developed a balancing test which weighed \"the interests of the [public employee], as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.\" See Pickering, 391 U.S. at 568. The district court failed to properly apply Pickering because the court never balanced the parties' respective interests; instead, the court appears to have assessed whether Plaintiff actually violated the College's sexual harassment policy by retaliating against the complaining student. Indeed, nowhere in the district court's opinion does it balance the interests involved; the court simply concludes that \"[t]he issue is whether the First Amendment protects the publication of [Plaintiff's] Yes, Virginia memorandum attached to a copy of the sexual harassment complaint filed against him that redacts the name of the complainant and her class. The Court holds that it does. Based on content, form, and context of the distribution, [Plaintiff's] speech relates to matters of a public concern, and was not done in retaliation for a complaint of sexual harassment.\" (J.A. at 150.) The district court misses the mark in its analysis and erroneously applies the relevant legal standard, which could possibly account for its erroneous decision to grant the preliminary injunction in this case. Specifically, the court failed to conduct a meaningful balancing of the interests involved in order to determine whether the College's interests in enforcing its policy outweighed Plaintiff's interests in speaking. i. Interests of the Parties Involved Plaintiff claims that his interests in free speech and academic freedom outweigh the College's stated interests in regulating Plaintiff's speech. Defendants contend that their interests in 1) disciplining Plaintiff for conduct that threatened the College's eligibility for receiving federal funding under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (\"FERPA\"), 20 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 35/47 U.S.C. \u00a7 1232g et seq., which forbids the release of educational records and the release of personally identifiable information absent prior written authorization; 2) prohibiting retaliation against students who file sexual harassment complaints, as expressly prohibited by the College's sexual harassment policy; 3) maintaining the confidentiality of a student complaint, as provided by Article VII.A.7. of the between the College and Plaintiff's union, MCCFO; and 4) maintaining a learning environment *822 free of faculty disruption, outweigh Plaintiff's interests which Defendants claim are negligible. 822 college's or university's interest in maintaining a hostile-free learning environment, particularly as it relates to its Title funding, is well recognized. However, the interests of allowing persons to speak freely in the college and university setting are equally as well-established such that the balancing of these interests is not an easy one where even the most revered universities struggle with creating a sexual harassment policy that preserves this delicate balance. See, e.g., 18 Berkeley J. Emp. Lab. L. at 306-19 (noting the sexual harassment policies of various institutions including Stanford University and Harvard Law School). Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (\"ACLU\") and the American Association of University Professors (\"AAUP\") recognize that limitations must exist on college professors' speech in order to provide a learning environment free of harassment; however, such organizations maintain that the limitations must be narrowly drawn so as not to compromise the professors' rights to academic freedom. See id. at 296-97. For example, the has opined that \"[a] sexual harassment policy . . . in an academic setting must be drawn very narrowly . . . [where it is] limited to situations where a practice of . . . sexually derogatory comments is . . . so pervasive and abusive as to demonstrably hinder the learning experience.\" Id. Although it is true that the complaining student in the case at hand filed her sexual harassment Complaint against Plaintiff with the College and not under Title IX, the College nonetheless took disciplinary action against Plaintiff in light of the College's policy against sexual harassment, and the same concerns thereby apply. Indeed, the inquiry and the concerns are the same whether the sexual harassment claim is brought pursuant to Title or pursuant to an internal sexual harassment policy. See Richard H. Hiers, 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 36/47 Academic Freedom in Public Colleges and Universities Say, Does that Star Spangled First Amendment Banner Yet Wave?, 40 Wayne L.Rev. 1, 48 (1993) (recognizing that teachers sanctioned for exercising what they believe to be constitutionally protected speech face the same legal hurdles of Connick, Pickering, and Mt. Healthy). This, along with the College's interests in maintaining the confidentiality of a student complaint as set forth in the CBA, protecting a complaining student from retaliation, and continuing its public funding are all interests which we find to be significant in \"promot[ing] efficiency and integrity in the discharge of [the College's] official duties. . . .\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 150-51, 103 S.Ct. 1684 (internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff claims that his interest in free speech under the First Amendment and his interest in academic freedom outweigh Defendants' purported interests. Academic freedom is \"a special concern of the First Amendment, which does not tolerate laws that cast a pall of orthodoxy over the classroom.\" Keyishian v. Bd. of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603, 87 S.Ct. 675, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); see also Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 487, 81 S.Ct. 247, 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960); Sweezy v. N.H., 354 U.S. 234, 250, 77 S.Ct. 1203, 1 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1957) (plurality opinion). Although academic freedom is not \"an independent First Amendment right,\" see Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1075 (11th Cir. 1991), the Supreme Court has long recognized the significance of academic freedom: The essentiality of freedom in the community of American universities is almost self-evident. No one should underestimate the vital role in a democracy that is played by those who guide and train our youth. To impose any strait jacket upon the intellectual leaders in our colleges and universities would imperil the future of our Nation. No field of education is so thoroughly comprehended by man that new discoveries cannot yet be made. . . . Teachers and *823 students must always remain free to inquire, to study and to evaluate, to gain new maturity and understanding; otherwise our civilization will stagnate and die. 823 Sweezy, 354 U.S. at 250, 77 S.Ct. 1203. However, the Supreme Court has also recognized that \"[a]cademic freedom thrives not only on the independent 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 37/47 and uninhibited exchange of ideas among teachers and students, but also, and somewhat inconsistently, on autonomous decisionmaking by the academy itself.\" Regents of Univ. of Mich. v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 226 n. 12, 106 S.Ct. 507, 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (citations omitted); Sweezy, 354 U.S. at 263, 77 S.Ct. 1203 (Frankfurter, J. concurring) (\"[The university atmosphere] is an atmosphere in which there prevail the four essential freedoms of a university \u2014 to determine for itself on academic grounds who may teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be admitted to study.\") (internal quotation marks omitted). Similarly, this Court has recognized that the term academic freedom \"`is used to denote both the freedom of the academy to pursue its end without interference from the government . . . and the freedom of the individual teacher . . . to pursue his ends without interference from the academy; and these two freedoms are in conflict.'\" See Parate v. Isibor, 868 F.2d 821, 826 (6th Cir. 1989) (quoting Piarowski v. Ill. Comm. College Dist. 515, 759 F.2d 625, 629 (7th Cir. 1985)). Although the College is not claiming an interest in academic freedom per se in support of its position in the matter at hand, it is important to bear in mind that a professor's right to academic freedom is not absolute, and the \"autonomous decisionmaking\" of the College must be considered when balancing the parties' respective interests. See Ewing, 474 U.S. at 226 n. 12, 106 S.Ct. 507. ii. Balancing of the Interests The balancing of interests between a faculty member's right to free speech and a college's or university's right in preserving its interests has recently been described as follows: Free speech rights stemming from the First Amendment apply to both students and faculty members on public colleges and university campuses. . . . [H]owever, those rights are not absolute. The objectives that underscore the First Amendment also reflect and reinforce the educational mission of colleges and universities. These objectives include advancement of a representative democracy and self-government; the pursuit of truth in the marketplace of ideas; and the promotion of individual self- expression and development. Constitutional protection is afforded 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 38/47 to the open and robust expression and communication of ideas, opinions, and information to further each of these objectives. This protection parallels a central mission of higher education: to nurture and preserve a learning environment that is characterized by competing ideas, openly discussed and debated. Arthur L. Coleman Jonathan R. Alger, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23 J.C. U.L. 91, 98-99 (1996) (footnotes omitted). In the matter before us, we believe that Defendants' purported interests, including maintaining the confidentiality of student sexual harassment complaints, disciplining teachers who retaliate against students who file sexual harassment claims, and creating an atmosphere free of faculty disruption, outweigh Plaintiff's purported interests. As noted by the several commentaries cited above, colleges and universities are legally required to maintain a hostile-free learning environment and must strive to create policies which serve that purpose. While a professor's rights to academic freedom and freedom of expression are paramount in the academic setting, they are not absolute to the point of compromising a student's right to learn *824 in a hostile-free environment. To hold otherwise under these circumstances would send a message that the First Amendment may be used as a shield by teachers who choose to use their unique and superior position to sexually harass students secure in the knowledge that whatever they say or do will be protected. Such a result is one that a state college or university is legally obligated to prevent, and such a result would fail to consider the countervailing interests. See 18 Berkeley J. Emp. Lab. L. at 320 ([\"The First Amendment and] [a]cademic freedom must not be used to shield the abuse of a captive audience by racially or sexually derogatory epithets.\"). 824 Speech that rises to the level of harassment \u2014 whether based on sex, race, ethnicity, or other invidious premise \u2014 and which creates a hostile learning environment that ultimately thwarts the academic process, is speech that a learning institution has a strong interest in preventing. The line drawn as to whether a professor's speech rises to this level is to be decided on a case by case basis, and in the instant case Plaintiff is not challenging the constitutionality of the College's sexual harassment policy. Our task today is 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 39/47 to balance the parties' respective interests under the facts of this case and, in doing so, we believe that the College's interest in preserving a learning environment free of sexual harassment, among others, outweighs Plaintiff's claimed free speech and academic freedom interests. As we acknowledged at the outset of this opinion, although this balance is a delicate one, we believe that the College's interests prevail under the facts and circumstances presented here. c. Summary The district court erred in concluding that Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of succeeding on the merits of his First Amendment claim; although Plaintiff's speech addressed a matter of public concern, Plaintiff failed to show that his interests in speaking outweighed the College's interests in enforcing its policies. It should be noted that Defendants' assertion of qualified immunity provides another basis as to why Plaintiff's claim may fail. It is well-established that the defense of qualified immunity grants government officials engaged in discretionary activities immunity from individual liability for civil damages unless their conduct violates \"clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.\" See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). The Court applies a two-part test to determine whether a government official is entitled to the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. See Summar v. Bennett, 157 F.3d 1054, 1057 (6th Cir. 1998). The first inquiry is whether the Plaintiff has shown a violation of a constitutionally protected right; and the second inquiry is whether that right was clearly established at the time such that a reasonable official would have understood that his behavior violated that right. See id. at 1058. To determine whether a right was clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity, we \"look first to decisions of the Supreme Court, then to decisions of this court and other courts within our circuit, and finally to decisions of other circuits.\" Chappel, 131 F.3d at 579. No decisions from the Supreme Court, our circuit, or any other court, clearly establish that Plaintiff's speech in the instant case was constitutionally protected so that Defendants would have understood that their disciplinary action violated 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 40/47 Plaintiff's rights. Thus, Defendants may be entitled to qualified immunity, and this could provide yet another basis for concluding that Plaintiff has not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his claim. See Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley Coll., 92 F.3d 968, 972-73 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that the defendant community college board of trustees was immune from the plaintiff-teacher's \u00a7 1983 suit for violation *825 of his First Amendment rights in relation to the discipline that the teacher received for responding to a student's sexual harassment claim because the defendants could not have reasonably known that the discipline violated an established right). 825 Having found that Plaintiff has failed to show a substantial likelihood of succeeding on the merits of his First Amendment claim, this preliminary injunction factor is thus dispositive of the issue, and we need not address the remaining three factors. See In re DeLorean Co., 755 F.2d at 1228. However, because the district court made specific findings on the remaining factors, we shall do the same. 2. Whether Plaintiff Would Suffer Irreparable Harm Without the Injunction When addressing this factor, the district court began by noting that \"Sixth Circuit authority is clear that a nontenured teacher does not have a constitutional right to teach a particular class. See Parate v. Isibor, 868 F.2d 821, 832 (6th Cir. 1989).\" (J.A. at 134.) After acknowledging this premise, the district court went on to state, without any supportive authority, that because Plaintiff \"is a professor under continuing contract at and indeed has been teaching there for 32 years, . . . he has a right to continued employment at MCC.\" (J.A. at 134.) Then, relying upon Mt. Healthy City Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977), the district court stated that \"[a]lthough [Plaintiff] does not have a liberty interest in his teaching position, if he was suspended for First Amendment activities then he has established irreparable harm.\" (J.A. at 134.) We find the district court's opinion misguided in this regard. First, the district court takes the preliminary injunction factors out of sequence claiming that the irreparable harm inquiry is determinative; then the court 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 41/47 finds, without any legal support, that because Plaintiff has been teaching under a contract for thirty-two years, he has a right to continued employment; then the court finds that Plaintiff does not have a liberty interest in his teaching position; and then the court goes on to say that despite the lack of a liberty interest in his teaching position, if Plaintiff can succeed in showing that he was suspended in violation of his First Amendment rights, he can show irreparable harm-which brings us right back to the first preliminary injunction factor which the district court should have considered at the outset. To further complicate matters, the district court never addressed the harm that Plaintiff would allegedly suffer if the injunction was not granted. It merely concluded that \"[Plaintiff would] suffer irreparable injury if he was suspended for engaging in First Amendment activities.\" Apparently, the district court was attempting to show that because Plaintiff is not tenured, it is unlikely that he would succeed on his \u00a7 1983 claim for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights, absent a showing that his First Amendment rights were violated. This is a correct proposition of law, see Mt. Healthy, 429 U.S. at 283-84, 97 S.Ct. 568, and would likely be true if Plaintiff could succeed on his First Amendment claim. See, e.g., Connection Distributing Co., 154 F.3d at 288. However, we do not believe that Plaintiff has shown a substantial likelihood of succeeding on the merits of his First Amendment claim, and where the injury is purely economic in nature, a preliminary injunction is not necessary in any event. See Celebrezze v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 812 F.2d 288, 290 (6th Cir. 1987). To that end, Plaintiff would not have suffered irreparable harm had the injunction been denied insofar as the little more than four months' suspension Plaintiff received without pay was compensable with monetary damages. Although Plaintiff contends that harm would have resulted without the injunction because his teaching style was being interfered with and his First Amendment rights were being violated, *826 Plaintiff has not shown that his speech was protected by the First Amendment. 826 3. Whether Issuance of Injunction Will Cause Harm to Others 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 42/47 4. Whether Public Interest Would be Served by Issuance of the Injunction The district court found that the issuance of the injunction would not cause harm to the College, and that the public interest would be served by issuance of the injunction because the First Amendment interests of Plaintiff and the public would be advanced. However, as we explained when balancing the parties' interests in this case, the injunction may cause harm to the students because without the College's enforcement of the sexual harassment policy and measures to protect its students from retaliation by a disgruntled professor, students may be forced to endure a hostile learning environment and may be intimidated into remaining silent. Moreover, without proper investigation of the sexual harassment Complaint, and appropriate response thereto, the College potentially compromises some of its funding. We do not find that Plaintiff's alleged harm outweighs the potential harm to others. See United Food Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Reg'l Transit Auth., 163 F.3d 341, 362 (6th Cir. 1998) (noting that the harm to the plaintiff's \"First Amendment rights should the preliminary injunction not be issued must be weighed against the harm to others from the granting of the injunction\"). Overall, the public interest would not be served in issuing the injunction. The very reason that allegations of sexual harassment inherently address a matter of public concern is because of the public interest in knowing that such goings on are properly investigated and not allowed to continue in any given arena. By issuing the injunction in this case, the district court usurped the College's attempt at maintaining a learning environment free of harassment and hostility in accordance with its sexual harassment policy. Again, we are not being asked to adjudicate the propriety of the College's sexual harassment policy. To the extent that the policy is in place, and that the College repeatedly warned Plaintiff that his actions were in violation thereof, we do not believe that the public interest was served by enjoining the College from enforcing its policy. As we stated at the outset of this discussion, a preliminary injunction is reserved for only the most egregious case, and should not be extended to cases which are doubtful or do not come within well-established principles 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 43/47 of law. See Detroit Newspaper Publishers. Ass'n, 471 F.2d at 876. Plaintiff's suspension without pay from his teaching position at a community college \"commencing August 18, 1999 and ending December 18, 1999\" wherein Plaintiff's fringe benefits remained in effect, did not rise to the level of requiring such extraordinary relief, particularly in a case such as this where it was not well-established whether the acts of expression for which Plaintiff was disciplined were protected under the First Amendment The district court's order granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction was based upon clearly erroneous findings of fact and an erroneous application of the law. In conducting the appropriate analysis, we hold that a balance of the four preliminary injunction factors weighs in favor of the College inasmuch as Plaintiff failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; he has not shown that he will suffer irreparable harm if the College continues to enforce its sexual harassment policy; the injunctive relief may result in harm to others; and the public interest will be served by denying the injunctive relief. We wish to emphasize that in seeking to strike the appropriate balance here today, we have carefully considered the parties' *827 respective interests and have not taken our task lightly. Just as we \"hope that whenever we decide to tolerate intolerant speech, the speaker as well as the audience will understand that we do so to express our deep commitment to the value of tolerance \u2014 a value protected by every clause in the single sentence called the First Amendment[,]\" see Edward J. Cleary, Beyond the Burning Cross 198 (1995) (quoting speech of Justice Stevens); we also hope that whenever we decide that intolerant speech should be restricted, it is understood that we do so with no less commitment to the value of tolerance and the First Amendment in which it is enshrined. 827 Accordingly, for the above stated reasons, we the district court's order granting Plaintiffs' motion for injunctive relief as to Plaintiff John Bonnell, and we the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 44/47 A. NELSON, Circuit Judge, concurring concur in the judgment and in much of the court's opinion am somewhat ambivalent, however, about our holding that the acts of insubordination committed by Professor Bonnell in publicizing his student's sexual harassment complaint \u2014 a breach of confidentiality against which he had repeatedly been warned \u2014 like his promiscuous broadcasting of the screed in which he sought to justify both the classroom recitals of his own sexual escapades and the apparently gratuitous use of coarse language in the classroom, rose to the level of speech in which the professor was expressing himself \"as a citizen\" on \"matters of public concern.\" The matters in question were obviously of intense concern to Professor Bonnell himself. As Bonnell explained in his apologia, he \"tend[s] to get a tad defensive when people don't just disagree with me, my values, my behavior, but who [sic] would also campaign for and delight in my utter destruction.\" The professor was clearly not disposed to let himself be destroyed without a fight. But an employee against whom disciplinary proceedings are brought for speaking on matters of personal concern is not always entitled to claim the highest degree of First Amendment protection for his speech. The key determinant of the type of protection extended to employee speech, as understand what the Supreme Court held in Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983), is whether the employee speaks \"as a citizen upon matters of public concern\" or speaks \"as an employee upon matters only of personal interest. . . .\" Id. at 147, 103 S.Ct. 1684. The dichotomy between \"citizen\" and \"employee,\" in this formulation, seems no less pertinent than the dichotomy between \"public concern\" and \"personal interest.\" The record before us makes it evident believe, that Professor Bonnell was not speaking \"as a citizen\" in the ordinary sense of that term. He was speaking, rather, \"as an employee\" with an absorbing personal interest in his raunchy classroom rhetoric, in his disgusted student's demand that he be fired immediately, and in his own professional survival. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 45/47 It would not be accurate to say, however, that Professor Bonnell confined himself to matters \"only\" of personal interest. The professor seems to believe in the virtue, if that is the word, of what Senator Moynihan called \"defining deviancy down.\" Professor Bonnell further believes that his status as an intelligent and articulate academician and a \"fine teacher\" means that the people who pay his salary have no right to require him to eschew scatological and sexual vulgarity that is not germane (at least in the view of those whose job it is to represent the taxpayers) to the content of the course he has been hired to teach. These and related beliefs to which Professor *828 Bonnell adheres are argued forcefully in his \"Apology\" \u2014 and whatever the merit of these somewhat curious beliefs, it seems to me that the Apology does touch on matters of public concern. 1 828 1 The quoted evaluation of Professor Bonnell's pedagogy comes from Bonnell himself. We have no reason to doubt the accuracy of his self-assessment. If our disposition of the appeal had necessarily turned on our answer to the question whether Professor Bonnell was speaking \"as a citizen\" upon matters of public concern should probably have swallowed hard \u2014 thinking uncharitable thoughts about the nature of the assignment given us \u2014 and answered in the affirmative. As it happens, however, the outcome of the appeal would be no different if we answered the question otherwise \u2014 if we held, i.e., that Professor Bonnell was speaking \"as an employee\" upon matters only of personal interest. Either way, given the inevitable result of our balancing of the parties' respective interests under Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), the order granting a preliminary injunction would have to be reversed. That being so, and in the absence of clear guidance from the Supreme Court on how Connick v. Myers is supposed to be applied in a \"mixed speech\" case such as this, my preference would be simply to assume the answer to the Connick question without undertaking to decide it. Just as hard cases make bad law, it seems to me that delphic questions can make bad law too prefer to duck such questions when can. That said reiterate my complete agreement with the outcome announced here. This, as see it, is a case where the legitimate interests of the employer 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 46/47 far outweigh those of the employee, and the decision to reverse the injunction granted by the district court certainly seems correct to me. About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 241 F.3d 800 | Casetext Search + Citator 47/47", "7419_106.pdf": "Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999 District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan - 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) August 27, 1999 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (1999) Professor John and Nancy L. Bonnell, Plaintiffs, v. Albert LORENZO, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as President of Macomb Community College; William MacQueen, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Vice President for Human Resources of Macomb Community College; Gus J. Demas, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as Dean of Arts and Sciences for Macomb Community College; and Mark Cousens, Individually and in his Representative Capacity as the Attorney for the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization, Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-71155. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 27, 1999. *778 Juan A. Mateo and James C. Howarth, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs. Thomas P. Brady, Detroit, MI, Timothy S. Ferrand, Pontiac, MI, for Defendants BORMAN, District Judge. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 1/40 Before the Court is Plaintiff John C. Bonnell's Emergency Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court heard oral argument on this motion on July 15 and 30, and August 3 and 19, 1999. Upon consideration of the motion, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court Plaintiff's motion and his immediate reinstatement with pay as a Professor of English at Macomb Community College Although the instant complaint is based in part on discipline received for using allegedly profane classroom language, the Court's resolution of the instant motion, as discussed infra, does not reach the issue of First Amendment protection of the specific profane speech used by Plaintiff in his classroom. The issue presently before this Court is whether, given the instant fact scenario, Plaintiff, who was already been suspended from teaching for seven months, can be suspended for an additional four months based upon the Defendants' determination that he violated the confidentiality of a student complainant, and retaliated against that student who had filed a complaint against him based upon his use of profane language in the classroom. Specifically, the issue is whether Plaintiff's conduct in releasing the student's complaint, after removing the student's name and class, and attaching an eight page memorandum discussing the First Amendment in responding to the complaint, was protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution, or was instead a violation of confidentiality and an act of retaliation against the student. This Court concludes that Plaintiff's conduct in releasing a redacted copy of the *779 complaint, attached to his response entitled An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause, was protected by the First Amendment and was not a breach of confidentiality or retaliation against the student complainant A. Underlying Factual Development Plaintiff Professor John C. Bonnell filed the instant action alleging, inter alia, that disciplinary action imposed against him violates his civil rights. The lawsuit names as [1] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 2/40 defendants in their individual and representative capacities Albert Lorenzo, President of Macomb Community College (MCC); William MacQueen, Vice President for Human Resources of MCC; Gus J. Demas, Dean of Arts and Sciences for MCC; and Mark Cousens, the attorney for the faculty union, the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization (MCCFO). Neither nor are named as defendants. Bonnell has been a professor of English and literature at since 1967. Bonnell asserts that throughout the decades he has employed \"all of the English language\" in his teaching style, including words which some may regard as offensive. Until the events giving rise to the instant action, Bonnell has never been disciplined for his use of classroom language. The genesis of this matter arises from a complaint filed against Bonnell by a student of his in the fall 1998 semester. The student asserted that Bonnell's profane language in the classroom, while not directed at any student, amounted to sexual harassment. Defendants ultimately determined that while colorable, the complaint lacked merit as to the sexual harassment claim. However suspended Bonnell for three days in February 1999 due to his allegedly profane classroom language. Thereafter, Bonnell responded to the student's complaint by redacting her name and class and distributing it along with his response, An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause reacted to Bonnell's response by suspending him for four months without pay, primarily for breach of confidentiality and for retaliation against the student complainant had established a sexual harassment policy in September 1992 which also enveloped the use of non-germane, profane language in the classroom. The policy stated, inter alia, that the [MCC] administration concluded that academic freedom does not protect acts of sexual harassment or the use of profane, vulgar, or obscene language which is unrelated to the course content and educational purpose. (Sexual Harassment Memorandum, Sept. 15, 1992 Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 1.) It also warned that the College will discipline teachers who sexually harass their students or gratuitously and regularly use profane, vulgar, or obscene language in the classroom. [2] [3] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 3/40 (Id.) The Court notes that the policy and the memorandum deal with two separate issues -- first, sexual harassment, and second, the use of non-germane, profane language. The Court recognizes that there is a significant difference, constitutionally, between the First Amendment protections afforded to an individual regarding use of classroom language, and use of language to retaliate against a student. Nevertheless, *780 because Bonnell's classroom language was the basis for the student's complaint, it is important to note that there is no evidence that Bonnell's use of profane language in the classroom was ever directed toward a particular student. MCC's sexual harassment policy was revised in February 1996 and May 1997. Defendant MacQueen, MCC's Vice President for Human Resources, issued a memorandum on July 30, 1997 which he distributed with the policy and which stated: Regular use of profane, vulgar or obscene speech in the classroom which is not germane to course content (and thus educational purpose) as measured by professional standards will lead to the imposition of discipline Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 3.) On January 19, 1998, a parent of a Bonnell student (not the student complainant in this matter) complained to about a handout Bonnell distributed in class. (See Letter by Keith Waller, Jan. 19, 1998 Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 4.) The handout, titled My Semester Overview, was prepared in 1991 by one of Bonnell's former students and reviewed Bonnell's course. The review is generally favorable, except for the professor's use of profanity. (See My Semester Overview Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 4.) Bonnell contends that he distributes this handout to his students at the beginning of each semester in order place them on notice of the type of language he employs in teaching the English course. Based on the January 19, 1998 complaint from the parent, MacQueen initiated an investigation. MacQueen wrote Bonnell a memo on February 19, 1998 regarding \"Obscene and vulgar language in classroom,\" and scheduled a meeting with Bonnell and his union representative on February 26, 1998. (See Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 5.) In a memorandum dated February 23, 1998, Bonnell agreed to the meeting and defended the language he used. (See Defendants' Response, OMPI, Ex. 6.) 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 4/40 Bonnell explained that he never directed any vulgar terms toward a particular student, and that he only used the words to demonstrate an academic point. With regard to the terms in My Semester Overview, Bonnell contended that he rarely used words like \"pussy\" or \"cunt\" as they are so emotionally charged. Bonnell maintained that he employed these terms to demonstrate \"the chauvinistic, degrading attitudes in society that depicts women as sexual objects, as compared with certain words used to describe male genitalia which are not taboo or considered to be deliberately intended to degrade.\" (Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, at 3.) The February 1998 investigation concluded with MacQueen issuing Bonnell a warning letter on March 4, 1998. The letter advised Bonnell that: Unless germane to a discussion of appropriate course materials and thus a constitutionally protected act of academic freedom, your utterance in the classroom of such words as `fuck,' `cunt,' and `pussy' may serve as a reasonable basis for concluding as a matter of law that you are fostering a learning environment hostile to women, a form of sexual harassment. (Memorandum Regarding Obscene and Vulgar Speech, March 4, 1998; Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. C.) During the 1998 fall semester, a second complaint was filed against Bonnell, which became the catalyst for the action at bar. On November 6, 1996, a female student enrolled in Bonnell's English 122 course telephoned to complain about his classroom language. An, as yet, unidentified employee instructed her to reduce her complaint to writing. She, thereafter, filed a written complaint which, in four places, termed her complaint about language as relating to sexual harassment. MCC, thereafter, treated it as a sexual harassment complaint. The written complaint alleged that, in discussing sexually *781 charged literature, Bonnell used \"lude [sic] and obscene comments ... [which] were dehumanizing, degrading, and sexually explicit.\" (Sexual Harassment Complaint, Nov. 6, 1998; (Attachment 1 Defendants' Brief, OMPI, Ex. 8.) Based on this charge, Defendant Demas, MCC's Dean of Arts and Sciences, instituted an investigation of Bonnell on November 16, 1998. Demas provided Bonnell a copy of the complaint and informed him that a meeting was scheduled to discuss it, and that he was entitled to have union representation present. Prior to the next meeting, Bonnell, after redacting both the complaining student's name and the class in which she was enrolled from the sexual harassment complaint, distributed [4] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 5/40 copies of it to the students in all six of his classes and posted it on a bulletin board outside of his class. Bonnell maintains that he did this in order to inspire a class discussion on academic freedom and to solicit student feedback. He indicated that he was under the impression that the complainant had withdrawn from the class, but that if she had been present, he would not have distributed the redacted copies. (See Transcript of Motion Hearing, Bonnell Testimony, August 3, 1999 at 68-71.) Defendant William MacQueen, Defendant Gus Demas, two representatives from the Macomb Community College Faculty Organization (MCCFO), Defendant Mark Cousens, MCC's general counsel, Bonnell, and others, met on December 3, 1998 to discuss the sexual harassment complaint. MacQueen informed Bonnell that the complainant orally relayed her concerns of Bonnell's use of the phrases \"blow job\" and \"butt-fucking\" in his class. Bonnell admitted to using the terms, but contends that he explained the context for this use, and that the terms were germane to course content. The Defendants assert that, while Bonnell did indicate that \"blow job\" was used in reference to the President Clinton/Monica Lewinsky affair, he did not state that the language was germane to his classes or was connected to an attempt to discuss issues of public concern. On December 12, 1998, in response to the instant student complaint and the ongoing investigation by MCC, Bonnell wrote an acerbic satire entitled \"An Apology: Yes, Virginia There is Sanity Clause,\" (hereinafter the \"Yes, Virginia\" memorandum). Among other topics, the Yes, Virginia memorandum responds to the specific issues of Bonnell's classroom language which the complainant relayed to MCC. Bonnell concluded his Yes, Virginia memorandum by stating that his use of the terms at issue was protected by the \"sanity clause,\" i.e., the First Amendment. (See Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. D.) Bonnell attached the Yes, Virginia memorandum to a redacted copy of the sexual harassment complaint, and distributed copies of both to more than two hundred faculty members second hearing on the sexual harassment complaint was conducted on December 18, 1998. Prior to the hearing had determined that there was no legally justifiable basis for the student's sexual harassment complaint against Bonnell. Ms. Margaret MacTavish, MCC's Director *782 of Human Resources Management and Affirmative Action Officer, testified that \"[t]he decision that was made was to pursue the complaint on the basis of the profane, vulgar, obscene language in the classroom rather than sexual harassment.\" (MacTavish Dep. at 135; Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law Pursuant to the Court's Directive on July, 16, 19[9]9, Ex. A.) Furthermore, at that hearing, Cousens, in the presence of officials, informed Bonnell that sexual harassment was no longer the issue. Indeed, MacTavish testified that before the officials met with Professor Bonnell, it [5] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 6/40 was determined that the agenda for that December 18 meeting was not sexual harassment, but the use of words. (Id. at 136 then proceeded, during that hearing, to concentrate on the issue of Bonnell's classroom language. At the hearing, the statements of some of Bonnell's students were taken. Of the five students present, only one student indicated a problem with Bonnell's language. On January 5, 1999, Demas issued a memorandum, prepared by MacQueen, which suspended Bonnell without pay from February 1-3, 1999. Demas/MacQueen concluded that Bonnell improperly used in his class the terms \"shit,\" \"damn,\" \"fuck,\" \"ass,\" \"butt- fucking,\" \"blow job,\" and \"tits on a nun are as useful as balls on a priest.\" (See Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. E.) Thus, to summarize the chain of events at this time had determined that the student complaint was not a valid claim of sexual harassment, and further, had disciplined Bonnell for his classroom language with a three day suspension. In response to his three day suspension, Bonnell drafted a scathing memorandum to Demas, and, like the redacted complaint and the Yes, Virginia memorandum, he distributed it to the faculty. (See Defendant's Brief, OMPI, Ex. 13.) On January 8, 1999, MacQueen issued a memorandum to Bonnell stating that Bonnell's distribution of his Yes, Virginia memorandum with the sexual harassment complaint may deter students from complaining. Accordingly, MacQueen instructed Bonnell: not to post, distribute, or discuss ... specific complaints filed by one or more of your students against you regarding sex harassment or your use of obscene or vulgar language, or such complaints against you generally, with any person enrolled in one or more of your classes unless permission has been granted by Provost] Dr. Rose Bellanca upon application of your union or attorney. This prohibition extends to discussion of any disciplinary action which has or may be taken against you. (Memorandum Regarding Discussion of Student Complaints, Jan. 8, 1999 Defendants' Brief, OMPI, Ex. 14) (emphasis added describes this memo as a \"privacy directive,\" while Bonnell refers to it as a \"gag order.\" This directive prevented a college English professor from informing his adult students that he was being suspended from teaching for three days. Were the students supposed to assume when he did not appear that Professor Bonnell was \"skipping\" class, shirking his responsibility as a [6] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 7/40 professor? It was an important part of his responsibility to his adult students to explain why he would not be teaching his classes. This was a draconian restriction on a professor's ability to properly communicate with his students. The Defendants contend that Bonnell violated this January 8, 199 directive and conducted a public retaliation campaign. During the latter half of January 1999, Bonnell, inter alia, distributed copies of the Yes, Virginia memorandum attached to the redacted student complaint to television channels 4 and 50, and to newspaper. In addition, *783 Bonnell violated the order by informing his classes that, due to his suspension, he would not be present to teach between February 1-3, 1999. Bonnell did not go into greater detail about his absence. On January 28, 1999, Bonnell met with MacQueen and others to discuss the circumstances surrounding the distribution of the Yes, Virginia memorandum and the redacted complaint. On February 1, 1999, during the first day of his suspension, nearly all of Bonnell's students were absent from his classes. Instead, they signed attendance sheets indicating that they were supporting Bonnell and protesting his suspension. In addition, some students demonstrated against Bonnell's suspension on the campus. On February 2, 1999 MacQueen placed Bonnell on an indefinite suspension, with pay and benefits, pending an investigation. That suspension, which lasted until July 9, 1999, prevented Bonnell from teaching in the spring and summer terms. MacQueen based the indefinite February suspension on (1) abnormally low attendance for the substitute teacher in Bonnell's classes; (2) the substitute teacher overheard a student stating that Bonnell told them they did not have to attend class, (3) MCC's discovery that Bonnell would allegedly mark down the grades of students who did attend class during his three day suspension; (4) disruptive protests by seven to nine of Bonnell's students; (5) Bonnell's alleged delivery of the confidential sexual harassment complaint to the news media in violation of both MacQueen's earlier directive and federal law; (6) Bonnell's alleged wasting of class time in order to prepare for a television news interview; and (7) Bonnell's discussion of his suspension with the media. MacQueen informed Bonnell that Because each of the foregoing matters is or may be causally related to disruption of the educational process (or even physical confrontation) in your classes or in other classes at Macomb, and requires investigation by the College [7] [8] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 8/40 which may lead to further disciplinary action, you are hereby suspended from your duties as a teacher with pay and benefits, effective February 4, 1999. This suspension will continue until you are notified by me in writing that you may resume your duties. During this suspension, you are hereby directed not to enter any campus of Macomb Community College except for the limited purpose of meeting with leaders or College officials relative to disciplinary action which has been or may be taken against you. You are also hereby directed not to discuss this suspension or any disciplinary action (verbally or in writing; directly or through a person acting in your direction) with any person enrolled as a student at Macomb or any person intent on disrupting the educational process at Macomb, unless written permission is granted by Dr. Rose Bellanca for good cause upon application of your union or attorney. (Memorandum Regarding Suspension, Feb. 2, 1999; Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. F) (emphasis added). The Court notes the draconian nature of this suspension: (1) Bonnell could not enter any campus except to meet with college or union officials; (2) Bonnell was also significantly restricted with regard to whom he could discuss his suspension. MacQueen's speech restrictions on Bonnell were a prior restraint, since Bonnell must request permission before being allowed *784 to speak to his students (or the media). See Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444, 451-52, 58 S. Ct. 666, 82 L. Ed. 949 (1938). Because prior restraints severely impact First Amendment rights, \"`[a]ny system of prior restraints of expression comes to [the court] bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.' Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70, 83 S. Ct. 631, 639, 9 L. Ed. 2d 584 (1963); see also Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 51 S. Ct. 625, 75 L. Ed. 1357 (1931). The Government `thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint.' Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419, 91 S. Ct. 1575, 1578, 29 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1971).\" New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct. 2140, 2141, 29 L. Ed. 2d 822 (1971) (Pentagon Papers) (per curiam). Moore v. Kilgore, 877 F.2d 364, 387 (5th Cir. 1989) (dissenting opinion). The Defendants have not demonstrated a compelling interest in restricting Bonnell's speech nor that the prior restraint is the least drastic means of doing so. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 9/40 Bonnell asserts that, through the collective bargaining process, he has sought protection from MCCFO's attorney, Defendant Mark Cousens, as early as March 1998. Bonnell contends that Cousens indicated that neither he nor the union supported Bonnell's interest. As a result, Bonnell retained private counsel. Bonnell sought to have his new counsel represent him at the next stage of disciplinary hearings set for March 1999. Based on the disciplinary action taken against him as of March 1999, and the continuing speech restrictions the Defendants had placed on him, Bonnell filed the instant complaint on March 10, 1999. Bonnell and his wife allege six counts in their Complaint: (I) Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights of Professor Bonnell, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1983, 1985; (II) Constitutional Substantive Violations; (III) Gross Negligence, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1983, 1985, 1988; (IV) Declaratory Judgment; (V) Negligence/Duty of Fair Representation under Michigan law; and (VI) Loss of Consortium. B. Subsequent Factual Development and Procedural Posture On March 10, 1999, along with his Complaint, Bonnell filed a motion for preliminary injunction or in the alternative for temporary restraining order. On May 6, 1999, the Court heard oral argument on this motion. Ruling from the bench, the Court denied the motion for that time, to permit the parties to proceed with a hearing at because, in an unprecedented action, rather than requiring that Bonnell be represented by union counsel at the hearing, Defendants Lorenzo, MacQueen, and Demas, and the agreed to permit Bonnell to be represented by his own counsel at the hearing. *785 The disciplinary hearing was held on May 25, 1999 at MCC. In attendance were Professor and Mrs. Bonnell and their counsel; Defendant MacQueen and his counsel; Defendant Cousens representing the MCCFO; William Romano, Assistant Grievance Coordinator for MCCFO; Marie Baeckeroot, Grievance Coordinator for MCCFO; Margaret MacTavish, Director of Human Resources of MCC; and Dr. Rose Bellanca, Provost of MCC. (See Transcript of Bonnell Grievance Hearing, May 25, 1999; Plaintiff's Brief, RMPI, Ex. A.) The hearing consisted of Bonnell being questioned on several issues by his attorneys and MacQueen. Bonnell denied encouraging his students to be absent on February 1, 1999 while he served his three day suspension. (See id. at 5-6.) Although admitted that he discussed his suspension after students questioned him, he denied that he commented on the specific details of the sexual harassment complaint against him, other than to explain that a student complained about his language. (See id. at 6-7.) Bonnell admitted that he provided the television and print media a packet containing a redacted copy of the [9] [10] [11] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 10/40 complaint, which omitted identifying characteristics of the student, and a copy of his satirical Yes, Virginia memorandum. (See id. at 7-9.) While he denied that he distributed copies of these material to his current students, he admitted that he gave a packet to a former student who later enrolled in the literature class he was teaching. (See id. at 7-10.) During the May 25, 1999 hearing, Bonnell maintained that he believed that his teaching methods complied with MCC's July 30, 1997 memorandum prohibiting regular use of profane, vulgar, or obscene language not germane to course content. (See id. at 12-13.) In addition, he submitted as evidence roughly twenty-five unsolicited letters of support from his students. These letters detail Bonnell's teaching methods, the events occurring during the week of his three day suspension, and why the students did not attend class. (See Plaintiff's Brief, RMPI, Ex. B.) Specifically, one letter from Sherry Davis explains that she voluntarily organized the boycott of Bonnell's class in protest of his suspension. (See id.) Finally, Bonnell detailed the attendance policy for his classes. Bonnell explained that he gives no credit for attendance when students attend a class. If they attend while he is absent, or if they attend a class preceding or following a class for which he announced that he would be absent, Bonnell gives his students a modicum, 1/64th, of credit. Put another way, Bonnell compensates students who attend class when he does not. Bonnell stated that this policy may have led to confusion during his suspension. (See May 25, 1999 Transcript at 23-25, Plaintiff's Brief, RMPI, Ex. A.) On June 7, 1999, MacQueen sent Bonnell a memorandum stating that, based on the January 28 and May 25, 1999 investigative hearings, \"there is reasonable cause to believe that [Bonnell] violated Federal and Michigan law.\" (Memorandum Regarding Notice of Charges, June 7, 1999; Plaintiff's Brief, RMPI, Ex. C.) In this memo, MacQueen formally notified Bonnell of four charges that was initiating against him: (1) Insubordination by distributing copies of the student's sexual harassment complaint and by discussing his discipline with students, both in violation of MacQueen's January 8, 1999 directive; (2) Breach of Confidentiality by distributing copies of the student's complaint and the satirical Yes, Virginia memorandum to the faculty, media, and a former student in violation of both the collective bargaining agreement between and and the Federal Family Educational and Privacy Rights Act (FERPA); (3) Retaliation against the complainant student by distributing the student's complaint in violation of MCC's policy prohibiting sexual harassment, federal Title IX, and the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA); and (4) Disruption of the Educational Process by materially contributing *786 to the absences of nearly all of his students in his classes and distributing the student's complaint. The memo concluded: 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 11/40 Since a finding that you committed any of the violations alleged above (including disruption of the educational process) may lead to the imposition of discipline, you are entitled to a hearing before Dr. Rose Bellanca at which you, your attorneys, and/or may present evidence or argument in opposition to a conclusion that you committed them or that disciplinary action should be taken. Please have your attorneys or representatives inform [MCC's attorney] by June 18, 1999 whether you wish a hearing. If a hearing is not requested, Dr. Bellanca will proceed to a determination of these charges. (Id. at 4.) On June 22, 1999 Plaintiff declined a hearing before Dr. Bellanca. On July 9, 1999 Provost Dr. Rose Bellanca issued a \"Disciplinary Suspension Memorandum\" to Professor Bonnell. Although the memorandum of findings was drafted by MacQueen, it was based on Dr. Bellanca's own conclusions regarding each of MacQueen's four charges. Dr. Bellanca first determined that Bonnell disrupted the educational process when he informed his students about his suspension, the \"gag order,\" that their attendance during this period was their choice, that they would receive credit for signing an \"attendance sheet,\" and when Bonnell distributed the sexual harassment complaint to the media. As a penalty for \"Disruption of the Educational Process,\" Dr. Bellanca imposed a formal reprimand. The Court concludes that the January 8, 1999 MacQueen directive prohibiting Bonnell from discussing his suspension with his students amounted to a gag order. Indeed, that \"gag order\" amounted to a disruption of the educational process. With respect to the charge of \"Insubordination,\" Dr. Bellanca concluded that Bonnell should be disciplined for violating MacQueen's January 8, 1999 memo, and for distributing the student's complaint to the media. As to this charge, Dr. Bellanca imposed an unpaid two week suspension. \"Insubordination\" is a strange term to use against an English professor under a continuing contract. The Defendants use of the term \"insubordination\" against Professor Bonnell ties in with the Defendants' argument that \"All he has is a right to industrial due process, as it were, industrial relations due process ....\" (Motion hearing, July 30, 1999, Transcript at 37.) The Court recognizes that colleges are a resource for ideas, free thought, experimentation, and critical thinking. The position of a college English professor includes with it First Amendment protections that may not be present in the military service or in an industrial job. The teaching of college English requires the communication of thoughts and ideas by reading and writing, and the use of [12] [13] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 12/40 the entire English language. When a college gags the professor or censors the students, the free expression of ideas and thoughts as supported by the First Amendment is impinged upon. There is no valid justification in support MCC's suspension of Bonnell for insubordination for 14 days without pay, from August 18, 1999 to August 31, 1999. Finally, Dr. Bellanca concluded that Bonnell was responsible for breach of confidentiality *787 and retaliation for distributing redacted copies of the sexual harassment complaint and his Yes, Virginia response. As to this charge, she imposed an unpaid four month suspension from August to September 1999 that would continue throughout the Fall 1999 semester. This suspension will be fully discussed, infra. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff seeks an order reinstating him with pay as a Professor of English at MCC, pending a full hearing on the merits of his claim in this court Appendix of the Agreement between the Board of Trustees of the Community College District of the County of Macomb and the (the Agreement) establishes a three step grievance procedure for teachers and the to pursue in the event of a dispute over the Agreement. (See Plaintiffs' Complaint, Ex. A.) Accordingly, the Defendants argue that the case before the Court is actually an untimely labor dispute as opposed to an action for First Amendment violations. The Defendants contend that Bonnell is suspended pursuant to the Bellanca Memorandum. The Defendants also maintain that the collective bargaining agreement requires Bonnell to resolve this dispute through the grievance/arbitration procedures prior to taking the matter to court, and, therefore, the court should dismiss the case for being untimely. Bonnell contends that the suspension was based on his exercise of his First Amendment rights relating to free speech. Generally, an employee may not pursue a civil action against his employer for breach of a collective bargaining agreement unless he has exhausted the grievance procedures set forth in the contract. See Rogers v. Board of Educ. of Buena Vista Schools, 2 F.3d 163, 166 (6th Cir. 1993); Sankar v. Detroit Board of Education, 160 Mich. App. 470, 474, 409 N.W.2d 213 (1986). Courts have, however, granted exceptions to this rule in situations such as where a plaintiff seeks remedies not provided under the collective bargaining agreement, or where a plaintiff's efforts to exhaust contractual remedies would be futile. See Sankar, id. [14] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 13/40 In the spirit of the first exception, an employee is not always required to exhaust remedies provided in a collective bargaining agreement when the employee challenges violations of rights independent of the contract, such as statutory claims. See, e.g., Wright v. Universal Maritime Service, 525 U.S. 70, 119 S. Ct. 391, 396-97, 142 L. Ed. 2d 361 (1998) (absent a clear and unmistakable waiver of the right to sue, longshoremen did not have to exhaust arbitration clause of collective bargaining agreement before filing claim under Americans with Disabilities Act). The same exception would apply in the case of challenging violation of constitutional rights. Bonnell has alleged that, in violation of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983, Defendants infringed upon his First Amendment rights. The Supreme Court has held that \"exhaustion of state administrative remedies should not be required as a prerequisite to bringing an action pursuant to \u00a7 1983.\" Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496, 516, 102 S. Ct. 2557, 73 L. Ed. 2d 172 (1982). In the context of \u00a7 1983 actions filed by teachers *788 for First Amendment violations, courts have relied on Patsy to hold that professors do not need to exhaust either state administrative remedies or remedies provided by collective bargaining agreements prior to their cases being heard in federal courts. For example, in Narumanchi v. Board of Trustees of the Connecticut State University, 850 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1988), a university professor filed suit after he was suspended without pay for two weeks, allegedly based on his race and vocal opposition to various university policies. The district court dismissed his First Amendment claims after the professor refused to avail himself of the grievance procedures in the collective bargaining agreement. In reversing the district court, the Second Circuit held that: [First Amendment rights] may not be infringed regardless of the procedural \"protection\" accompanying the deprivation. ... [It is not] permissible, in light of Patsy v. Board of Regents, supra, to require initial recourse to available state proceedings, including union grievance proceedings, for the enforcement of First Amendment rights protectable in federal court pursuant to section 1983. See Clark v. Yosemite Community College District, 785 F.2d 781, 790 (9th Cir. 1986); Hochman v. Board of Education, 534 F.2d 1094 (3d Cir. 1976). Narumanchi, 850 F.2d at 73 (emphasis added). See also Mellody v. Upper Merion Area School District, No. CIV. A. 97-5408, 1998 54383, *4 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 1998); Mahoney v. Hankin, 593 F. Supp. 1171, 1173-74 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). Accordingly, Bonnell is not required to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing his \u00a7 1983 action. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 14/40 Bonnell moves for a preliminary injunction to require the Defendants to reinstate him to his position as an English professor at MCC. In the original motion for preliminary injunction, Bonnell requested an order permitting his private counsel to represent him during any disciplinary proceeding. In light of the Court's May 6, 1999 ruling, this issue is now moot. In evaluating a motion for preliminary injunction, the Court considers four factors: (1) the likelihood that the party seeking the preliminary injunction will succeed on the merits of the claim; (2) whether the party seeking the injunction will suffer irreparable harm without the grant of the extraordinary relief; (3) the probability that granting the injunction will cause substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest is advanced by the issuance of the injunction. See Amelkin v. McClure, 168 F.3d 893, 902 (6th Cir. 1999) (quotation marks and citation omitted). The Court will examine these factors in a slightly modified sequence. A. Irreparable Harm From the events giving rise to the instant action has issued Bonnell a number of disciplines and/or restrictions. Prior to Dr. Bellanca's suspension memorandum of July 9, 1999, Bonnell had received a three day suspension from February 1-3, 1999 for use of non- germane, profane classroom language; a privacy directive; and then on February 2, 1999 an indefinite suspension for \"investigation\" which concluded on July 9, 1999. In July 1999, after reviewing the \"charges\" issued against Bonnell in June 1999, Dr. Bellanca imposed three sanctions: a formal reprimand, an unpaid two week suspension from mid-August to late August 1999, and an unpaid four month suspension during the fall 1999 semester from mid-August to mid-December, 1999. Of these disciplinary actions, a portion of the two week suspension, and the unpaid four month suspension have yet to be served. The Defendants contend that while Plaintiff may have a contractual right to receive his salary during the resolution of his grievance, he does not have a constitutional right to work. Consequently, *789 they maintain, Plaintiff has not demonstrated the 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 15/40 requisite irreparable harm necessary for a preliminary injunction if votes to proceed with his grievance. Two principal issues are before the Court: I. Was Plaintiff was suspended for exercising his First Amendment rights when he distributed to faculty, students, and the media copies of his Yes, Virginia memorandum and a redacted version of the student's sexual harassment complaint? II. Assuming, arguendo, that Plaintiff was suspended for exercising First Amendment rights, does he have a constitutional right to teach while he attempts to grieve his suspension through the contractual arbitration process? Since a determination that Plaintiff has not suffered irreparable injury would preclude further analysis of his motion for preliminary injunction, the Court will examine the irreparable harm issue first, i.e., the second of the above listed issues Sixth Circuit authority is clear that a nontenured teacher does not have a constitutional right to teach a particular class. See Parate v. Isibor, 868 F.2d 821, 832 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing Sullivan v. Brown, 544 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1976)). In Parate, a nontenured engineering professor filed a section 1983 action and moved for a preliminary injunction to reinstate him after university officials terminated him at the end of his contract. Parate asserted separate claims under both the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. Without regard to the First Amendment claim and solely related to Plaintiff's \"Fourteenth Amendment claim that the [university officials] arbitrarily and unreasonably interfered with his due process liberty interest in the free and full pursuit of his profession as a ... professor,\" the court held that Parate had no Fourteenth Amendment right to teach at that university nor a constitutional right to teach a specific class. Id. at 831-32. In the instant case, however, Bonnell is a professor under continuing contract at and indeed has been teaching there for 32 years. Thus, he has a right to continued employment at MCC. While a professor has no liberty interest to teach a specific class or teach at a particular university, a professor does have a constitutional right to teach in an environment free from First Amendment violations. In Mt. Healthy City Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 16/40 97 S. Ct. 568, 50 L. Ed. 2d 471 (1977), an untenured school teacher was not rehired after, inter alia, he called a local radio station to publicly criticize the administration for a new dress code for teachers, and after he used obscene gestures toward students in the cafeteria. In examining Doyle's claim that he was not rehired due to his First Amendment activities, the Court held that Doyle's claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments are not defeated by the fact that he did not have tenure. Even though he could have been discharged for no reason whatever, and he had no constitutional right to a hearing *790 prior to the decision not to rehire him, he may nonetheless establish a claim to reinstatement if the decision not to rehire him was made by reason of his exercise of constitutionally protected First Amendment freedoms. Mt. Healthy, 429 U.S. at 283-84, 97 S. Ct. 568, 50 L. Ed. 2d 471 (emphasis added). Although Bonnell does not have a liberty interest in his teaching position, if he was suspended for First Amendment activities then he has established irreparable harm. This conclusion is also supported by Newsom v. Norris, 888 F.2d 371 (6th Cir. 1989). In Newsom, prison inmate advisors sought a preliminary injunction to be reinstated after they were not reappointed, allegedly in retaliation for criticizing the performance of the Chairman of the Disciplinary Board. The inmate advisors claimed, inter alia, that the failure of the warden to reappoint them to their positions violated their First Amendment rights. Like Parate, the Sixth Circuit determined that the inmate advisors did not have any liberty interests in their positions. However, the Sixth Circuit held: Although the appellees did not demonstrate a cognizable property interest in their position as inmate advisors, they did however have a cognizable liberty interest in remaining in their respective positions free from impermissible interference. It is well recognized that it is constitutionally impermissible to terminate even a unilateral expectation of a property interest in a manner which violates rights of expression protected by the First Amendment. Newsom, 888 F.2d at 375 (emphasis added) (citing, inter alia, Mt. Healthy, 429 U.S. at 283-84, 97 S.Ct. 568). [15] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 17/40 The Sixth Circuit further supported its decision with Supreme Court authority relating to the situation at bar, i.e., rights of teachers to teach: Existing [Supreme Court] case precedent indicates that a failure to reappoint an individual to a position is equally impermissible, even where there was no cognizable expectation of continued service, if reappointment was denied because of the individual's exercise of First Amendment rights. Thus, the respondent's lack of a contractual or tenure \"right\" to reemployment for the 1969-70 academic year is immaterial to his free speech claim. Indeed, twice before, this Court has specifically held that the nonrenewal of a non- tenured public school teacher's one-year contract may not be predicated on his exercise of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 81 S. Ct. 247, 5 L. Ed. 2d 231 (1960); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 87 S. Ct. 675, 17 L. Ed. 2d 629 (1967). We reaffirm those holdings here. Newsom, 888 F.2d at 376 (emphasis added) (quoting Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507, 515, 100 S. Ct. 1287, 63 L. Ed. 2d 574 (1980)) (also citing, inter alia, Mt. Healthy). Also based on Supreme Court authority, the Newsom court determined that even minor infringements of First Amendment rights constitute the irreparable harm necessary for injunctive relief as \"`[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.'\" Newsom, 888 F.2d at 378 (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S. Ct. 2673, 49 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1976) (plurality opinion of Brennan, J.)). Therefore, in the case at bar, Bonnell will suffer irreparable injury if he was suspended for engaging in protected First Amendment activities. B. Likelihood of Success on the Merits Bonnell filed a 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 action against the defendants. The elements *791 for a \u00a7 1983 claim are: \"`1) [Plaintiff] was deprived of a right secured by the federal Constitution [16] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 18/40 or laws of the United States; 2) the deprivation was caused by a person acting under color of state law; and 3) the deprivation occurred without due process of the law.'\" Chatman v. Slagle, 107 F.3d 380, 384 (6th Cir. 1997) (quoting O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids, 23 F.3d 990, 995 (6th Cir. 1994)) (alterations supplied). In the case at bar, the Defendants are employed by a state institution and are acting under state law. See, e.g., Silva v. University of New Hampshire, 888 F. Supp. 293, 312 (D.N.H. 1994). Bonnell's current four month suspension is ostensibly based on, inter alia, distributing his Yes, Virginia memorandum with the redacted sexual harassment complaint to the faculty, other students, and the public at large contends that these actions breached the confidentiality for the complainant provided in Section I.A. and Section of MCC's Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment; Article VIII. A.7 of the Master Agreement between and the MCCFO; the Family Educational and Privacy Rights Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1232g; Title of the Educational Amendments to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1681 et seq.; and the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act ANN. \u00a7 37.2101, et seq also asserts that Bonnell's actions could be regarded as retaliation against the complainant as set forth in the Bellanca memorandum: The distribution of your memorandum titled An Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause was designed to discredit [the complainant] as an immature young woman in need of enlightenment, and thus was designed to destroy her credibility as a complainant. Most significantly, your memorandum is thoroughly demeaning and insulting to [the complainant] as a person in both its content and its tone. It is the very antithesis of how a teacher should treat a student and how a complainant would expect to be treated given the assurances of the law and College policy. (July 9, 1999 Memorandum from Dr. Rose Bellanca to John Bonnell, regarding Disciplinary Suspension, at 6.) Professor Bonnell asserts that the First Amendment protects the distribution of the Yes, Virginia memorandum, as it relates to academic free speech. In addition, Bonnell maintains that his current suspension is a pretext: that is disciplining him for his classroom language. Essentially, Plaintiff contends that not only was his classroom language the basis for his three day suspension, but that MCC's \"privacy directive\"/\"gag [17] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 19/40 order\" was a continuation of discipline, and finally, that the suspension for breach of confidentiality/retaliation was further discipline for his challenging MCC's actions regarding his exercise of his First Amendment rights. The issue at bar has developed into whether the First Amendment protects Plaintiff's distribution of the redacted sexual harassment complaint and the Yes, Virginia memorandum. The Supreme Court has held that government employees, including public teachers, retain First Amendment rights to comment on matters of public concern without fear of retribution by the government *792 as their employer. See Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 140, 103 S. Ct. 1684, 75 L. Ed. 2d 708 (1983); Dambrot v. Central Michigan University, 55 F.3d 1177, 1185 (6th Cir. 1995). In Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568, 88 S. Ct. 1731, 20 L. Ed. 2d 811 (1968). The Court developed a balancing test which weighed \"the interests of the [public employee], as a citizen in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.\" In Pickering, the Supreme Court was confronted with a situation where the school district dismissed a high school teacher \"for sending a letter to a local newspaper in connection with a recently proposed tax increase that was critical of the way in which the Board and the district superintendent of schools had handled past proposals to raise new revenue for the schools.\" Pickering, 391 U.S. at 564, 88 S. Ct. 1731. The Supreme Court held that the issue of school funding was a matter of legitimate public concern, and that free open debate on that subject matter was vital to informed decision making by the electorate. In the instant case, Plaintiff contends that free speech in a classroom, and responding to persons challenging free speech in a classroom, is a matter of legitimate public concern. Furthermore, in Pickering the Supreme Court stated: Teachers are, as a class, the members of a community most likely to have informed and definite opinions as to how funds allotted to the operations of the schools should be spent. Accordingly, it is essential that they be able to speak out freely on such questions without fear of retaliatory dismissal. Id. at 572, 88 S. Ct. 1731. In the instant case, Plaintiff contends that he, as an English teacher, is a person most likely to speak out and have an informed and definite opinion with regard to germane speech in the classroom, and that accordingly, it is essential that he be able to speak out on an issue without a retaliatory dismissal. The Court agrees. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 20/40 Further, Plaintiff contends that since had concluded that the student's complaint, which discussed Plaintiff's classroom language and sexual harassment, clearly did not raise an issue of sexual harassment, the remaining aspect of the complaint was language in the classroom. Thus, Plaintiff contends that his Yes, Virginia memorandum dealing the \"Sanity Clause,\" clearly dealt with the First Amendment classroom speech issue. Plaintiff further contends that he used the redacted student complaint, which had caused his February 1-3, 1999 suspension, as a context for him to respond both to her challenge to his classroom language, and MCC's gag order that sought to prevent him from discussing these First Amendment issues, even with his college students. The Supreme Court in Pickering concluded: the interest of the school administration in limiting teachers' opportunities to contribute to public debate is not significantly greater than its interest in limiting a similar contribution by any member of the general public. Id. at 573, 88 S. Ct. 1731. In the instant case cannot limit Plaintiff's opportunity to contribute to the public debate on what is germane language in the classroom of a professor of the English language. The Supreme Court in Pickering emphasized the \"public interest in having free and unhindered debate on matters of public importancethe core value of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.\" Id. at 573, 88 S. Ct. 1731. The Supreme Court held that: a teacher's exercise of his right to speak on issues of public importance may not furnish the basis for his dismissal from public employment. Id. at 574, 88 S. Ct. 1731. In the instant case cannot suspend Bonnell from teaching because of his speaking out on *793 First Amendment issues. Plaintiff has spoken on an issue of public importance that deserves the court's protection. The Court recognizes an issue raised in Pickering, and discussed by the Supreme Court thereafter in Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S. Ct. 1684 (1983), that must be discussed. In Pickering, the Supreme Court noted that under those facts, the fact of plaintiff's employment was only tangentially and insubstantially involved in the subject matter of his public communication, so as to regard the teacher as a member of the general 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 21/40 public. In the instant case, the Defendants contend that under Connick v. Myers, Plaintiff is directly involved through his employment position with the issue at bar, and thus is not protected under the First Amendment. In Connick, the Supreme Court noted: For at least 15 years, it has been settled that a state cannot condition public employment on a basis that infringes the employee's constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression. Connick, 461 U.S. at 142, 103 S. Ct. 1684. The Supreme Court held in Connick: when a public employee speaks not as a citizen upon matters of public concern, but instead as an employee upon matters only of personal interest, absent the most unusual circumstances, a federal court is not the appropriate forum in which to review the wisdom of a personnel decision taken by a public agency allegedly in reaction to the employee's behavior. Id. at 147, 103 S. Ct. 1684. In Connick, the Supreme Court incorporated the Pickering balancing test into a two step analysis for determining whether discipline against a public employee violates the First Amendment. The primary concern is whether the speech at issue may be \"fairly characterized as constituting speech on a matter of public concern.\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 103 S. Ct. 1684; see also Dambrot, 55 F.3d at 1186. If the speech relates to a matter of public concern, the court moves to the second step of the analysis and applies the Pickering balance test; \"[i]f the employee's free speech interests outweigh the efficiency interests of the government as employer, the employee's First Amendment rights have been violated.\" Dambrot, id. 1. Public Concern The issue of whether speech relates to public concern is a question of law. See Dambrot, id. In Connick, the Supreme Court explained that \"public concern relate[es] to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community.\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 103 S. Ct. [ 8] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 22/40 1684. The Seventh Circuit has elaborated that by \"public concern,\" the Connick Court \"did not mean matters of transcendent importance, such as the origins of the universe or the merits of constitutional monarchy; they meant matters in which the public might be interested, as distinct from wholly personal grievances ... and casual chitchat.\" Dishnow v. School Dist. of Rib Lake, 77 F.3d 194, 197 (7th Cir. 1996) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). Connick instructs that \"[w]hether an employee's speech addresses a matter of public concern must be determined by the content, form, and context of a given statement, as revealed by the whole record.\" Connick, 461 U.S. at 147-48, 103 S. Ct. 1684. In the case at bar the issue is whether, based on the content, form, and context of the Yes, Virginia memorandum and redacted sexual harassment complaint, Bonnell's *794 speech related to a matter of public concern. The content and form of Bonnell's speech specifically relate both to the sexual harassment complaint and to the First Amendment free speech clause. Further, it is important to note that the sexual harassment complaint had already been resolved in Bonnell's favor at the time of his Yes, Virginia memorandum. This supports the conclusion that he Yes, Virginia memorandum was what its title and conclusion asserted it to be a discussion of First Amendment issues, in the context of classroom language. Professor Bonnell testified that he distributed the complaint in class in order to inspire a debate on academic freedom under the First Amendment, that he distributed the complaint and the Yes, Virginia memorandum in order to specifically give context to the discussion: Q. Sir, you indicated that you wanted to discuss the concepts of academic freedom and First Amendment by distributing [the redacted complaint]? A. Yes. Q. You could discuss in your class academic freedom and [sic] context of First Amendment without any complaints being filed against you? A. Probably could have. [18] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 23/40 Q. You could have had a similar discussion without distributing [the sexual harassment] complaint couldn't have that discussion needed that document to give it the specific context to the discussion. Q. The context of the discussion was her particular complaint against you for language and sexual harassment. That was the context of the discussion with your students. That's what you just said? A. No. What I'm saying, the thing that triggered the First Amendment concern happened to be couched in that letter. It came in the form of that letter. Q. But to have that discussion with your class, you didn't need to distribute her specific complaints? A. That's true. Q. In terms of actual distribution and discussion with the students the context was the complaint that she filed against you, is that correct? A. That was triggered, yes. Q. Wasn't that the context of it? That's what brought the issue to context? 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 24/40 A. That is not the only the [sic] thing that we talked about. The academic field is broader than that complaints [sic]. Q. It may be, but you specifically discussed her complaint, correct? A. It was specifically used as a trigger for discussion in Q. Sir, did you discuss her complaint? A. Not in particular detail. Q. Why did you distribute it to the students? A. Because it was a document. True, they didn't need to know, but it was [sic] document that was pertinent. Q. And it was pertinent that she made a complaint against you? A. It was pertinent because it existed, and thee was a complaint against me evidently because of that document. Q. That's what made it relevant because she filed a complaint against you? 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 25/40 A. Yes. Q. With respect to the Yes, Virginia document, you testified that your distribution of Yes, Virginia, together with a copy of the [sexual harassment] complaint, you also distributed, correct? A. That's right. Q. And again, you said that you distributed that with respect to general issues of academic freedom and freedom of speech? A. Yes. Q. You could have that discussion, that academic discussion concerning First Amendment and academic freedom, with *795 your faculty cohorts without using that document, correct? A. Probably so, yes. Q. That document gave it contexts [sic] to you that this was dealing with a specific complaint by a specific student against your conduct, correct? A. And with the addition that the college was acting on it, so that if a similar complaint came against any teacher at any time, the person could respond. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 26/40 Q. That was not the question. You discussed or attempted in your own words to discuss those concepts with your faculty fellows by distributing the student complaint and the Yes, Virginia letter. A. Yes. (Transcript of Motion Hearing, Bonnell Testimony, August 3, 1999 at 68-71.) While Bonnell acknowledged that he could have had a discussion of academic freedom without distributing the redacted complaint to his classes, it was the context of the complaint that made his discussion significant and relevant, not only in class, but also with the faculty and the media. In Cliff v. Bd. of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis, 42 F.3d 403 (7th Cir. 1994), the plaintiff was a public school teacher who alleged that school board violated her First Amendment rights by not renewing her contract after she complained about her large class size and problems with student discipline. The court held that although her complaints addressed a subject of general interest to the public, her First Amendment claim failed as a matter of law since her expression was directed only to the personal impact of those issues on her. See id. at 409. The Seventh Circuit explained the analysis to determine whether these complaints were a matter of public concern: Connick requires that we consider \"the content, form, and context\" of Cliff's statements as revealed by the record as a whole (461 U.S. at 147-48, 103 S.Ct. at 1690-91), and our cases indicate that of these three, content is the most important. The motive which underlies an employee's statements is a relevant but not necessarily dispositive factor number of our cases thus direct attention to \"`the point of the speech in question; was it the employee's point to bring wrongdoing to light? Or to raise other issues of public concern, because they are of public concern? Or was the point to further some purely private interest?'\" Yet we also have indicated that motive cannot rise to the level of an absolute litmus test because it does not supplant content in terms of overall importance to the public concern inquiry. Thus, the fact that an employee speaks at least in part for personal reasons will not automatically deprive her statements of the protections afforded to speech on a matter of public concern. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 27/40 Instead, the speaker's personal motive is considered along with the other Connick factors. Cliff, 42 F.3d at 409-10 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). This rationale was adopted by the Sixth Circuit. See Chappel v. Montgomery County Fire Protection Dist. No. 1, 131 F.3d 564, 576 (6th Cir. 1997). Thus the issue here is whether Bonnell's discussion/distribution relating to the personal complaint amounted to speech on a matter of public concern. In Cliff, the plaintiff argued that her statements about class size and disciplinary problems were matters of public concern. However, the court recognized that although the community would no doubt be interested in these issues, \"the fact that an employee speaks up on a topic that may be deemed one of public import does not automatically render [her] remarks on the subject protected.\" Id. at 410 (citation and quotation marks omitted). Additionally, the court noted that Cliff only complained in response to criticism directed at her classroom performance in her annual reviews. The entire eight page Yes, Virginia memorandum does not state that the student had filed a sexual harassment complaint against Bonnell, or even use the *796 term sexual harassment. It is totally directed toward a discussion of the English language. This indicates that Bonnell's motive in writing the Yes, Virginia memorandum was not to retaliate for a sexual harassment complaint, but instead to discuss First Amendment concerns in the context of classroom language. In the instant case, the issue relating to speech in class transcends the more personal, individual matters of class size and discipline in Cliff. These are matters of significant public First Amendment concerns. 2. Pickering Balance Test The First Amendment provides teachers, especially professors, academic freedom which \"emphasizes the essentiality of free public expression of ideas.\" Dambrot, 55 F.3d at 1189. In Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603, 87 S. Ct. 675, 17 L.Ed.2d 629(1967), the Supreme Court elaborated: 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 28/40 Our Nation is deeply committed to safeguarding academic freedom, which is of transcendent value to all of us and not merely to the teachers concerned. That freedom is therefore a special concern of the First Amendment, which does not tolerate laws that cast a pall of orthodoxy over the classroom. `The vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools.' The classroom is peculiarly the `marketplace of ideas.' The Nation's future depends upon leaders trained through wide exposure to that robust exchange of ideas which discovers truth `out of a multitude of tongues, (rather) than through any kind of authoritative selection.' (citation omitted). Bonnell has substantial protectable interests because his speech related to matters of public concern. Yet, the Court recognizes that the First Amendment does not provide him with carte blanche authority to trump the interests of his students to be free from retaliation for filing sexual harassment complaints. However, given this balancing test, it is important to note that the Defendants ruled that the sexual harassment complaint, which related to classroom language not directed to any particular person, was without merit. The complaint procedure of MCC's Sexual Harassment policy specifies: To protect the interests of the complainant, the alleged sexual harasser, witnesses, any others who may report incidents of sexual harassment, and all other persons affected, confidentiality will be maintained to the extent practicable and appropriate under the circumstances. (Sexual Harassment Policy, Rev. May 20, 1997 at 2 Defendants' Response, RMPI, Ex. 14.) This is in line with the and agreement stating that \"[c]are must be taken to preserve confidentiality during the entire process [of handling students' complaints of faculty.]\" (Agreement, Art. VIII.A.7, Complaint Ex. A.) In addition, the policy prohibits retaliation: Macomb Community College shall assure that no individual shall be retaliated against for making a complaint of sexual harassment, opposing sexual harassment, or participating in an investigation under this policy, regardless of whether a policy violation is found. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 29/40 (Sexual Harassment Policy, \u00a7 III.D. at 4.) Webster's dictionary defines \"confidential\" as \"Communicated or effected secretly 297 (1988). Bonnell redacted the complainant's name and class. This maintained the confidentiality of the complainant. Thus, Bonnell's concern was to deal with the language contained in the complaint and not the specific complainant. Indeed, it was the Defendants who subsequently released the complainant's name to the public, with her permission. *797 The law is unsettled as to whether the release of a redacted complaint would be a violation of the FERPA. Compare Warner v. St. Bernard Parish School Board, No. CIV.A. 96-1839, 1998 50016 (E.D. La. Feb. 5, 1998 violated when teacher sent newspaper a letter from a student's mother which expressed the mother's controversial views) with Red & Black Publishing Co., Inc. v. Board of Regents, 262 Ga. 848, 427 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 1993) (records of students' violations of university policies not protected by FERPA). In the instant case, given the redaction of the complaint as to both her name and the class in which she was enrolled, this Court need not decide this issue. The record before this Court does not support MCC's finding that Bonnell's actions constituted retaliation. For example, Bonnell explained that he passed out the redacted sexual harassment complaint to discuss in it his classes as he believed that the complainant had dropped his class, and he would not have done so if she were present in his class .... If [the complainant] was [in class], you would have given [the complaint] to her, right? A. No. Q. Why not? A. Because knew that it would include her. It would be her. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 30/40 Q. You knew that then she would know that the focus of the discussion was on her complaint, right? A. Yes. Part of the focus was on her complaint. The discussion on academic freedom was triggered by her document. Q. You didn't need a document to have an academic discussion? A. Sure used that context. Q. You are not giving it out if she happened to be in class is obviously related to the fact that she made the complaint? A. Yes. Q. And the focus of her was the discussion, and what she said, right? A. If she had been there would think it might have been retaliation, but there was none, and it didn't appear assumed she dropped, and it was closed as far as she was concerned. (Transcript of Motion Hearing, Bonnell Testimony, August 3, 1999 at 84.) The facts appear to be that the complainant did not drop the class but instead stopped attending. (Id. at 86- 87.) Nevertheless, Bonnell's testimony indicates that his conduct was not directed at the complainant. The issue is whether the First Amendment protects the publication of Professor Bonnell's Yes, Virginia memorandum attached to a copy of the sexual harassment complaint filed against him that redacts the name of the complainant and her class. The Court holds that it 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 31/40 does. Based on the content, form, and context of the distribution, Bonnell's speech relates to matters of a public concern, and was not done in retaliation for a complaint of sexual harassment. Thus, the Court concludes that Bonnell has a significant likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that the Defendants suspended him in violation of his rights under the First Amendment. C. Other Preliminary Injunction Factors The third factor in evaluating a motion for preliminary injunction is the probability that granting the injunction will cause substantial harm to others. In the instant case, granting the injunction will not cause harm to the Defendants. Failure to grant the injunction will cause significant harm to the Plaintiff who has already been suspended from teaching for seven months, and further harm to students who wish to enroll in his classes. Indeed, Dr. Bellanca testified that realize that students think that he's an outstanding teacher, and respect that ....\" (Transcript of Motion Hearing, Bellanca Testimony, July 30, 1999 at 221). *798 Finally, the Court must examine whether the public interest is advanced by the issuance of the injunction. As this factor is similar to the Pickering balancing test, the Court relies on the analysis, supra, and determines that the First Amendment interests of Plaintiff and the public are advanced by the issuance of this injunction to reinstate Professor Bonnell at MCC. Based on an examination of the four factors relevant to the issuance of a preliminary injunction, the Court Plaintiff's renewed motion for preliminary injunction The Defendants assert that Plaintiff's publication of the redacted complaint and the Yes, Virginia response were likely to stifle potential student sexual harassment complaints by publically maligning and intimidating the instant complainant. On the other hand, the Defendants concede that they concluded early on that the instant complaint about classroom language was not a valid sexual harassment complaint. Indeed, the Defendants [19] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 32/40 informed Bonnell of that finding on December 18, 1998. Defendant MacQueen stated, as the meeting with Bonnell broke up made the remark that this is not a sexual harassment case, as we do not view this as a sexual harassment case. (Transcript of Motion Hearing, MacQueen Testimony, July 30, 1999 at 78.) Further, as to the May 25, 1999 investigative meeting with Professor Bonnell that his personal attorneys were permitted to attend, MacQueen testified: Well, we were concerned whether he had discussed his discipline with his students *799 in the spring term, the spring 1999 term, and whether he had distributed the memorandum styled \"Yes, Virginia\" to the students or to the media. (Transcript of Motion Hearing, MacQueen Testimony, July 30, 1999 at 94.) Thus was concerned about two areas of conduct, both of which involved significant First Amendment considerations. First, Bonnell's speaking to his English students about his being suspended from teaching due to his use of the English language. Second, Bonnell's distribution of his Yes, Virginia memorandum discussing the \"Sanity Clause,\" to wit, freedom of expression under the First Amendment, using, as context, a student letter challenging his expression, which had already been determined early on by not to be a viable sexual harassment complaint. The justification set forth in the July 9 Bellanca memorandum in support of the four month suspension, was \"Breach of Confidentiality and Retaliation\" by his distribution of the student complaint, and his Yes, Virginia memorandum. Professor Bonnell acted to depersonalize his actions and protect the student's confidentiality by removing the complainant's name and class from the copies he distributed. The Defendants, with the student's consent, published her name. It is important to note that the Defendants first used the student's complaint as a basis to discipline Plaintiff Bonnell, not for sexual harassment, but for his use of what the Defendants determined to be improper, non-germane classroom language. In other words, what the Defendants now contend was a sexual harassment complaint, was 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 33/40 determined by them to not be a valid sexual harassment complaint. Indeed, the Defendants appear to have used that complaint as a basis for suspending Plaintiff for his classroom speech because they concluded that his speech was not protected by the First Amendment. Professor Bonnell reacted to that February 1999 classroom speech suspension by responding directly to the complaint about speech and MCC's action to restrict his speech in the classroom. Yet, when Bonnell took that same complaint, which had been a basis for suspending him for his language, and used it for necessary context to respond on the issue of his First Amendment rights, the Defendants reversed field and now contend that the issue was really sexual harassment after all, and that Bonnell's response was retaliation against the student complainant. The Defendants' argument lacks coherence. Since the basis for the suspension in February was classroom language as attributed to that complaint, in order to respond to that complaint-based suspension, it was logical that Bonnell utilize the complaint for necessary context. Some of the language utilized by Bonnell in his Yes, Virginia memorandum was harsh, and some of it was directed to specific allegations of the anonymous complainant. Yet, it was necessary to utilize the complaint for context and to respond to it. The Court finds that the redaction of the name and class of the complainant, and generalized discussion in the Yes, Virginia memorandum of the use of the English Language, albeit much of it not of the King's English, resulted in a discussion of the First Amendment rights of an English professor. Both the beginning of Bonnell's memorandum, which speaks of the \"Sanity Clause,\" i.e., the First Amendment, and its conclusion which recites the First Amendment, clearly indicate that Professor Bonnell was discussing First Amendment issues. That the Defendants, with the permission of the student complainant, chose to release her name is not a basis for terming Professor Bonnell's memorandum a specific retaliation against her. *800 Thus, while the Defendants term the present four month suspension as being based upon a \"Breach of Confidentiality and Retaliation,\" the facts presented to the Court do not support this finding. The redacted release of the complaint combined with the Yes, Virginia memorandum, given the facts behind the initial February suspension for language, and the Defendants determination that this was not a valid sexual harassment complaint, do not sustain the suspension on this ground. Finally, the Court notes that the Defendants have already suspended Plaintiff Bonnell for seven months, thereby preventing him from teaching in the spring 1999 and summer [20] 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 34/40 1999. The Court rejects the Defendants' contention that this suspension was not a penalty because he received pay. The Court concludes that this suspension, which prevented him from pursuing his profession as an English teacher, has already imposed a significant penalty on him, and has deprived him of his First Amendment right to free speech in his classroom. Thus, even if the Defendants could justify imposing on Bonnell a four month suspension from classroom teaching for breach of confidentiality and retaliation, that has already been served Bonnell has been suspended from teaching for the last seven months. Accordingly, the Court concludes that a preliminary injunction should be issued requiring that Professor Bonnell be reinstated immediately with pay to his teaching position at Macomb Community College [1] Although both Professor John C. Bonnell and his wife Nancy L. Bonnell jointly filed the instant action, the term \"Plaintiff\" refers to Professor Bonnell. [2 Defendants\" collectively refers to Defendants Lorenzo, MacQueen, and Demas. [3] As the emergency renewed motion for preliminary injunction incorporates the original motion for preliminary injunction, this Order necessarily cites to both sets of briefs and exhibits. Accordingly, the citation \"OMPI\" refers to the original motion for preliminary injunction, and \"RMPI\" refers to the renewed motion for preliminary injunction. [4] Hereinafter, the terms \"complainant\" or \"complaining student\" refer to the student who filed the instant complaint against Bonnell on November 6, 1998. [5] Bonnell based his An Apology: Yes, Virginia, there is a Sanity Clause memorandum on the famous editorial \"Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus,\" first published in the on September 21, 1897. See Special Anniversary Issue of the London Free Press (Ontario, Canada PRESS, Feb. 25, 1999, at El. Francis P. Chuch wrote the editorial in response to eight year old Virginia O'Hanlon's letter questioning the existence of Santa Claus. Virginia's letter and Church's response are widely known as a number of newspapers have reprinted them each Christmas for over one hundred years. See, e.g NEWS, Dec. 25, 1998, at B2 NEWS, Dec. 25, 1998, at F5. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 35/40 [6] In addition to being Vice President of Human Relations for MCC, Defendant MacQueen is also a labor law attorney. [7] On July 9, 1999 Provost Rose Bellanca, inter alia, suspended Bonnell for four months without pay, from August to late December 1999. This is discussed, infra. [8] The Defendants informed Bonnell that his delivery of the student's complaint to the news media violates, inter alia, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1232g. (See Memorandum Regarding Suspension, Feb. 2, 1999; Plaintiff's Brief, OMPI, Ex. F.) [9] Bonnell's next disciplinary hearing was originally scheduled for March 11, 1999. However, along with the instant complaint, Bonnell filed a motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order on March 10, 1999. Accordingly, the Defendants adjourned that hearing upon learning through Bonnell's new counsel that he would not attend this meeting. [10] On April 26, 1999 Plaintiffs filed a motion to file a First Amended Complaint. The amended complaint contains adds one count: (VII) Pendant State Law Claim: Breach of Contract Against Defendant Board of Trustees of the Community College District of the County of Macomb. [11] Aside from the action taken by MCC, Jim Yizze, president of the MCCFO, issued a memorandum to all Union members on May 10, 1999. In addition to providing a summary of Bonnell's case to date, the Yizze memorandum stated the Union is not required to support all grievances, but instead is only obligated to objectively consider the merits of each case presented to the Faculty Senate. Yizze concluded that Bonnell does not have the right to replace representatives unilaterally, but he does have the right to waive representation and pursue his cause through alternative means. (See Memorandum Regarding John Bonnell Suspension Update, May 10, 1999; Plaintiff's Brief, RMPI, Ex. D.) [12] See supra, n. 6. [13] The U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit noted in Trotman v. Bd. of Trustees of Lincoln University, 635 F.2d 216, 230 (3d Cir. 1980): It is particularly important that in cases dealing with academia, the standard applied in evaluating the employer's justification should be the one applicable to the rights of teachers and students \"in light of the special characteristics of the school environment,\" and not that 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 36/40 applicable to military personnel who must meet the \"overriding demands of discipline and duty.\" (quoting Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506, 89 S. Ct. 733, 21 L. Ed. 2d 731 (1969); Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 744, 94 S. Ct. 2547, 41 L. Ed. 2d 439 (1974)). [14] Bonnell has requested his union, MCCFO, to file a grievance on his behalf concerning these disciplinary sanctions. On two recent prior occasions, the Faculty Senate, by wide margins, voted not to proceed with grievances requested by Bonnell. If the votes to file the grievance, Bonnell will be suspended from teaching with pay while the matter is being resolved. If refuses to support the grievance, then Bonnell will receive no pay. Further, even if supports the grievance, if Bonnell loses the grievance decision, he will be suspended without pay for four months. During the grievance process, Bonnell will be suspended from teaching for the four months of August to December, 1999, pursuant to the Bellanca memorandum of July 9, 1999. [15] In Mt. Healthy, the district court found that the telephone call was \"clearly protected by the First Amendment\" and that because it played a \"substantial part\" in the district's decision not to rehire Doyle.. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, and the Supreme Court vacated and remanded. The Supreme Court held that the district court used the wrong test to analyze Doyle's claims. The Court explained that after he satisfied his burden of showing that his conduct was constitutionally protected and was a motivating factor in the board of education's decision not to rehire him, the district court should have gone on to determine whether the board of education had shown by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have reached the same decision even in absence of the protected conduct. The Supreme Court accepted the district court's determination that the phone call was constitutionally protected in part because there was no suggestion by the Board that Doyle violated any established policy. See Mt. Healthy, 429 U.S. at 284, 97 S. Ct. 568. In the instant case had a policy of confidentiality with regard to sexual harassment complaints. [16] 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress .... 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 37/40 [17] Although not relevant to the motion at bar, Bonnell alleges in his Complaint that Defendant Cousens' conduct is also under \"state law\" since he allegedly conspired with the Defendants. See Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 101 S. Ct. 183, 66 L. Ed. 2d 185 (1980). [18] In Connick, a former assistant district attorney asserted that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was allegedly terminated for circulating a questionnaire relating to her superior's decision to transfer her to a different section of criminal court. The Supreme Court held that although one of the questions, relating to whether employees felt pressure to work in political campaigns, was a matter of public concern, that the interests of her employer in effectively and efficiently fulfilling his public duties outweighed any harm to the Plaintiff. [19] The (1975) noted: The primary function of a university is to discover and disseminate knowledge by means of research and teaching. To fulfill this function a free interchange of ideas is necessary not only within its walls but with the world beyond as well. It follows that the university must do everything possible to ensure within it the fullest degree of intellectual freedom. The history of intellectual growth and discovery clearly demonstrates the need for unfettered freedom, the right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. To curtail free expression strikes twice at intellectual freedom, for whoever deprives another of the right to state unpopular views necessarily also deprives others of the right to listen to those views. We take a chance, as the First Amendment takes a chance, when we commit ourselves to the idea that the results of free expression are to the general benefit in the long run, however unpleasant they may appear at the time. The validity of such a belief cannot be demonstrated conclusively. It is a belief of recent historical development, even within universities, one embodied in American constitutional doctrine but not widely shared outside the academic world, and denied in theory and in practice by much of the world most of the time. Because few other institutions in our society have the same central function, few assign such high priority to freedom of expression. Few are expected to. Because no other kind of institution combines the discovery and dissemination of basic knowledge with teaching, none confronts quite the same problems as a university. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 38/40 (Id. at 5-6). Above all, every member of the university has an obligation to permit free expression in the university. No member has a right to prevent such expression. Every official of the university, moreover, has a special obligation to foster free expression and to ensure that it is not obstructed. (Id. at 7.) If expression may be prevented, censored or punished, because of its content or because of the motives attributed to those who promote it, then it is no longer free. It will be subordinated to other values that we believe to be of lower priority in a university. The conclusions we draw, then, are these: even when some members of the university community fail to meet their social and ethical responsibilities, the paramount obligation of the university is to protect their right to free expression. This obligation can and should be enforced by appropriate formal sanctions. If the university's overriding commitment to free expression is to be sustained, secondary social and ethical responsibilities must be left to the informal processes of suasion, example, and argument. (Id. at 8-9.) [20 editorial, Capsizing Academic Freedom, June 21, 1999, at 6A, captured the significance of Professor Bonnell's complaint. Comparing Professor Bonnell's situation with that of a local canoeist, who after capsizing used profane language in the presence of women and children, the editorial pointed out: [A]nother free speech battle in the state was generally ignored, although its significance is far greater than the case of the potty mouthed canoeist. John Bonnell, a popular and highly regarded English professor at Macomb Community College, was suspended four months ago for using pungent and graphic language during his classroom. This is part of Mr. Bonnell's teaching method. He claims it has been an effective way of reaching his students during his 32-year career and even cautions his classes at the start of each semester that they can expect to hear this sort of speech from him. Nonetheless, a student filed a complaint against him last January, and when Mr. Bonnell refused to alter his salty style he was suspended without pay lawsuit was filed, and the case is being argued in closed hearings at the college. Although Mr. Bonnell's case raises a 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 39/40 serious issue of academic freedom, it does not have the media titillation factor of a soaked Mr. Boomer standing in the Rifle River and letting loose a stream of curses. Moreover, interference with free speech on campus has become an all-too-familiar story. College administrators, aquiver with sensitivity and keenly alert to lawsuits, repeatedly squelch speech or activity that conceivably may offend a government-certified and protected group. * * * * * * Mr. Bonnell, however, was engaged in instruction in a clearly defined space and had advised those who might be offended to seek other options. Many of his students have picketed in his behalf. Hopefully, the college's administrators will also demonstrate the clarity of understanding shown by its students. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 81 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. Mich. 1999) :: Justia 40/40", "7419_107.pdf": "Search\u2026 \uf002 Advanced Campus Speech Database Identity of Speakers John Bonnell Faculty/Staff Other John Bonnell was a professor of English at Macomb Community College. Resources Article Appeals Court Opinion Additional Information Incident Nature: Classroom Incident Political Orientation: Neither \uf05a \uf05a \uf05a \uf05a \uf05a Privacy - Terms 1998 2001 Macomb Community College (Public college or university) Warren, MI, United States 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo \u2013 Campus Speech 1/4 Incident Responses: University investigation issuing in sanctions Faculty sanctioned Incident Status: Settled Did not involve Speech Codes Summary John Bonnell was a professor of English at Macomb Community College. In February 1998, a student complained about Bonnell\u2019s use of obscene and graphic language in the classroom. Bonnell received a warning that his use of sexual language might be grounds for a sexual harassment complaint against him. In November 1998, a female student enrolled in Bonnell\u2019s class filed a written sexual harassment complaint, claiming that Bonnell\u2019s classroom language constituted sexual harassment. In response, Bonnell made copies of the complaint and distributed the copies to students in all of his classes and to college faculty members, with a satirical essay attached entitled \u201cAn Apology: Yes, Virginia, There is a Sanity Clause.\u201d Bonnell was subsequently suspended with pay and benefits pending an investigation into his actions, including disseminating the student complaint to local news media. On March 10, 1999, Bonnell filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against various college administrators, alleging \u00a7 1983 and \u00a7 1985 violations of his First, Fourteenth, and Sixth Amendment rights. Bonnell sought a preliminary injunction requesting his immediate reinstatement to his teaching position at the college. After the court remanded the matter to the college for an administrative hearing, Bonnell filed a renewed emergency motion for preliminary injunction. On August 27, 1999, the district court issues its memorandum opinion and order granting Bonnell\u2019s renewed motion for a preliminary injunction. Bonnell thereafter returned to his teaching position. The defendants appealed the decision, and on March 1, 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the districted court\u2019s order and remanded the case for further proceedings, holding that the college\u2019s interests in \uf05a \uf05a \uf05a 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo \u2013 Campus Speech 2/4 protecting the complainant\u2019s confidentiality, disciplining Bonnell for allegedly retaliating against the complainant, and maintaining an atmosphere free of faculty disruption outweighed Bonnell\u2019s academic freedom and free speech interests subsequent writ of certiorari United States Supreme Court was denied in October 2001. Bonnell eventually returned to teaching at Macomb and died in 2014 Search Haltigan v. Drake Felkner v. Rhode Island Hunt v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, et. al. Jim McGlothlin Speech at William & Mary Law School Lars Maischak v. California State University Vanderbilt University protests West Texas University, Drag Shows 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo \u2013 Campus Speech 3/4 Mission Contact Us Designed and Developed by Penner Web Design Fakhreddine v. University of Pennsylvania Alpha Psi v. Bond at Chapel Hill, Bari Weiss/Frank Bruni event Administrator Contingent Faculty Staff Student Student Group Tenured Faculty Faculty Unaffiliated Uncategorized 2/22/25, 10:22 Bonnell v. Lorenzo \u2013 Campus Speech 4/4"} |
7,630 | Eric Samuels | University of California – Berkeley | [
"7630_101.pdf",
"7630_102.pdf",
"7630_103.pdf"
] | {"7630_101.pdf": "Locations California Therapists Berkeley Therapists Eric Samuels Eric Samuels (He/Him/His) Psychologist, PsyD California \u2022 New York Anxiety - College & graduate student mental health - Gender identity & transgender health - LGBTQIA, gender, & sexuality topics - Men's issues - Relationship issues - See all See Eric's Details for: California Accepting online In-network with some insurances $200 Professional statement Dr. Eric Samuels is a Licensed Psychologist who has been treating individuals and couples in California and New York since 2011. He received a Psy.D. in Clinical Psychology from The Wright Institute in Berkeley, California and did many years of training where he worked with college students and with people with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. Dr. Samuels specializes in helping young adults, men individuals, and people with disabilities deal with general concerns like anxiety, depression, adjustment, and relationship issues. He has been an adjunct professor, a supervisor, and has given many guest lectures and workshop presentations. He currently volunteers with the Gender-Affirming Letter Access Project to provide pro-bono evaluations to individuals who are seeking gender- affirming surgeries. Dr. Samuels strives to ensure a strong therapeutic relationship with each client and couple he works with. He desires that his clients knows that he cares about them and that they can feel safe and accepted during therapy sessions. He also works to be authentic and genuine during therapy sessions. Dr. Samuels also believes in Client-Centered Therapy and wants each of his clients and couples to know that they can set the agenda for the therapy session. He uses Motivational Interviewing as a main modality of treatment and believes that a person or couple will not be able to do anything if they do not have the motivation for it. In addition, Dr. Samuels believes that an individual's or couple's underlying thought processes and stories often govern how they behave, so he utilizes Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Narrative Therapy to assist individuals and couples in changing their underlying thoughts and narratives so that they have better outcomes. He also tries to be empowering, strengths-based, and compassionate- Vetted About Specialties Locations Insurance & Fees Testimo Book a Free Initial Consultation The practice will call you for a free 10min phone call to discuss your needs and ensure a match! Or Message Therapist This provider has no upcoming call times available. Book Call Send Message 2/22/25, 10:23 Eric Samuels, Therapist in Berkeley, California \u2014 Zencare 1/4 oriented in his work. When working with couples, he utilizes the Gottman Method. Message to clients Are you unsure about how to solve a problem? Feeling anxious or depressed? Hate yourself? Do the same problems keep reoccurring? Are you struggling with a transition? Do you have concerns about your relationships and struggle to express your needs with partners, friends, or family members? Struggling with a part of your identity? Are you having difficulty sleeping? Do you have no appetite or find yourself overeating? Feeling tired, lacking concentration, and having difficulty motivating yourself can help you. Therapy will ignite change in your life, and look forward to supporting you in seeking that change provide quality treatment to clients. If work with you will work to make you feel safe and cared for, focus on what you are motivated to do, and utilize practical approaches that will focus on emphasizing your strengths, empowering you, increasing your insight, and teaching you skills. Work and Education Years of Experience: 9 years Ignite Change Therapy, Licensed Psychologist in Private Practice, 2017 - Present Argosy University Bay Area, Adjunct Professor, 2017 - 2017 Berkeley Counseling and Psychological Services, Postdoctoral Fellow, 2016 - 2017 Indiana University Counseling and Psychological Services, Doctoral Intern, 2015 - 2016 City College of San Francisco Counseling Center, Practicum Intern, 2014 - 2015 The Wright Institute, Psychology Doctorate, 2016 Indiana University, Master's of Science in Higher Education & Student Affairs, Counseling Concentration, 2009 The Ohio State University, Bachlor of Arts in Political Science and International Studies; Minor in Sociology, 2006 Licensure California: 29311 - New York: 024830 Languages English Specialties 2/22/25, 10:23 Eric Samuels, Therapist in Berkeley, California \u2014 Zencare 2/4 Anxiety - Coping with excessive worry, nervousness, or stress; intense discomfort in social settings (social anxiety); sudden and intense feelings of panic (panic disorder) College & graduate student mental health - Specialized strategies for common issues of young adulthood, including school and career stressors, support around healthy relationships, existential concerns, drug or alcohol issues, eating disorders, and anxiety and/or depression. Gender identity & transgender health - Exploring gender identity, including trans, non-binary, and gender variant identities; support throughout the process of transition LGBTQIA, gender, & sexuality topics - Exploring topics of sexuality, gender, and identity; coping with discrimination and oppression; navigating relationship, family, and cultural challenges Men's issues - Expertise in working with adult men; providing a safe and understanding space to address life challenges and promote physical and mental health Relationship issues - Understanding one\u2019s wants and needs in relationships; exploring patterns of interaction, addressing concerns, and strengthening satisfaction in relationships and dating General expertise Adoption & foster care Anxiety College & graduate student mental health Communication issues Couples counseling Depression Gender identity & transgender health LGBTQIA, gender, & sexuality topics Life transitions Men's issues Phobias & fears Relationship issues Stress management Social anxiety Dating Isolation Self-care Guilt Treatment approaches Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Client-Centered Therapy Couples counseling Motivational Interviewing Narrative Therapy Positive Psychotherapy Solution Focused Therapy Strength-Based Therapy Gottman Method Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) Clientele Adults (24+) Parents 2/22/25, 10:23 Eric Samuels, Therapist in Berkeley, California \u2014 Zencare 3/4 Couples Young adults (18-24) Locations & Hours California New York Insurance Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of California Lyra Health Out-of-pocket fees Individual sessions: $200 (50min) Client testimonials \"Excellent. Highly recommend. Couldn\u2019t have been better.\" - Zencare client \u2022 July 2024 New York therapists Massachusetts therapists Rhode Island therapists California therapists Texas therapists Florida therapists All therapists New York therapy groups Massachusetts therapy groups Rhode Island therapy groups California therapy groups Texas therapy groups Florida therapy groups All therapy groups Aetna Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Cross Blue Shield Cigna All health insurances Anxiety Depression Trauma Relationship issues LGBTQIA, gender, and sexuality All specialties Couples counseling Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Eye Movement Reprocessing (EMDR) Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) Internal Family Systems (IFS) Mindfulness Practices All therapy types \u00a92025 RESERVED. 2/22/25, 10:23 Eric Samuels, Therapist in Berkeley, California \u2014 Zencare 4/4", "7630_102.pdf": "Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist October 3, 2017 / 10:20 San Francisco sexual harassment lawsuit filed Thursday by a student at the University of California at Berkeley against a former university employee the student saw in 2016 for therapy is just another example of a \"pattern\" of sexual harassment at the university, according to the student's lawyer. The suit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court, names Eric Samuels as a defendant in the case along with the Regents of the University of California News Weather Sports Video 51\u00b0 Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:23 Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist San Francisco 1/5 At the time of the alleged offenses Samuels was a post-doctoral fellow at the Tang Center's Counseling and Psychological Services on the Berkeley campus. Samuels allegedly had started providing counseling to the student, according to the complaint. The complaint was filed on behalf of Justina Roe, whose real name is not listed in the suit READ: Former Berkeley Chancellor Dirks Discusses His Rocky Tenure According to Roe's attorney John Winer, Samuels allegedly videotaped Roe at least once during one of the therapy sessions he had with her and may have used it for his personal gratification. Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:23 Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist San Francisco 2/5 According to the complaint, the camera should have been pointed at Samuels in order to preserve confidentiality, which a counseling and psychological services director told Roe after the videotaping. According to the complaint, Samuels allegedly pointed the camera at Roe during their third therapy session and began by asking her questions about boys and her sexual experience, which made Roe uncomfortable. \"We believe very strongly this therapist was taking video to take home and masturbate,\" Winer said. From the beginning Roe was uncomfortable with Samuels, according to the complaint. He made extended eye contact with her and had an almost glazed look in his eyes when he greeted her for the first time, the complaint said. In their first therapy session, Samuels allegedly asked Roe whether she had been sexually abused. During the second therapy session, he allegedly asked her a question about sex that made her \"extremely uncomfortable.\" The complaint said afterwards she tried to convince herself that the question came from \"a professional place.\" Roe started therapy to deal with anxiety and stress when she went to CPS, according to the complaint. Winer said Samuels is no longer at the university. According to Winer, Samuels was scheduled to leave at the end of the 2016 and he was allegedly suspended from the university for only a day. \"She doesn't trust the university,\" Winer said of Roe. Roe now has to deal with the alleged harassment before she can get help for the stress and anxiety she went to get help for, Winer said. Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:23 Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist San Francisco 3/5 \u00a9 2017 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. According to Winer, \"There appears to be a pattern\" of sexual harassment at the university, citing a handful of recent sexual misconduct allegations involving university staff. University spokeswoman Janet Gilmore said the university has not been served with the suit so it's premature to comment on it. \u00a9 Copyright 2017 by San Francisco and Bay City News Service. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. In: Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Berkeley More from News Bay Area tech companies Roblox and Discord face lawsuit Alameda County court workers go on strike after contract negotiations fail Dublin High brawl sends 2 students to hospital, locks down campus Suspect arrested in fatal hit-and-run of beloved Berkeley professor Watch News Be the first to know Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. 2/22/25, 10:23 Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist San Francisco 4/5 \u00a92025 Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Details Contact News Sports Weather Program Guide Sitemap About Us Advertise Television Jobs Public File for / CBS5 Public File for / KPIX+ Public Inspection File Help Applications Report Watch News 2/22/25, 10:23 Berkeley Student Files Sex Harassment Suit Against Ex-Campus Therapist San Francisco 5/5", "7630_103.pdf": "Dr. Eric Samuels Cleared of Allegations in Berkeley Sexual Harassment Case Case Against Psychologist Dismissed; No Money from Samuels to be Paid to Plaintiff Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier Mar 29, 2018, 04:14 \uf0ab BERKELEY, Calif., March 29, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Dr. Eric Samuels has been exonerated of claims that he sexually harassed \"Justina Roe\" while working as a Postdoctoral Fellow at Berkeley Counseling and Psychological Services during the 2016/2017 academic year. Though the Regents of the University of California and Ms. Roe negotiated a financial settlement, Dr. Samuels was dismissed from the case, and he is not liable for any part of the settlement gay man, Dr. Samuels denied Ms. Roe's claims. In addition Berkeley Counseling and Psychological Services investigated Dr. Samuels's treatment of Ms. Roe; independent experts also reviewed the treatment record and the video of the therapy session in question. Both the investigation and the independent experts' reviews refuted Ms. Roe's claims. \"Due to the confidential nature of therapy, Dr. Samuels cannot respond to Ms. Roe's allegations in detail publicly,\" said Jamie L. Dupree of the law firm Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier am pleased to have helped him be exonerated and clear his name am relieved that am able to put this behind me,\" Dr. Samuels stated. \uf045 Dr. Samuels maintains a private therapy practice in Oakland and San Francisco. He obtained a doctorate in Clinical Psychology from The Wright Institute and specializes in treating young adults, men individuals, and people with disabilities. Dr. Samuels is currently on the board of the Alameda County Psychological Association and is an active member of many professional associations, including Gaylesta, the Psychotherapist Association for Gender and Sexual Diversity. He is a former Chair of the California Psychological Association of Graduate Students and a former member of the American Psychological Association of Graduate Students Committee on Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. Contact: Sam Singer Phone: 415.227.9700 Singer Associates Public Relations San Francisco [email protected] or Jamie L. Dupree Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier Phone: (415) 399-3843 [email protected] Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In PRNEWSWIRE.COM? \uf045"} |
7,582 | Jay Fliegelman | Stanford University | [
"7582_101.pdf",
"7582_102.pdf",
"7582_103.pdf",
"7582_104.pdf",
"7582_105.pdf",
"7582_106.pdf"
] | {"7582_101.pdf": "( ( () Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation ( copy_CROP.jpg confidential letter ( usp=sharing) sent by Stanford to former graduate student Seo-Young Chu M.A. \u201901 reveals new details about Chu\u2019s public accusations of sexual assault and harassment against now- deceased English Professor Jay Fliegelman Ph.D. \u201977. The letter, which Chu shared with The Daily, indicates that then-Provost John Etchemendy Ph.D. \u201982 personally oversaw a University investigation that found Fliegelman responsible for sexual harassment rather than sexual assault but also concluded that \u201cChu\u2019s assent could be questioned\u201d in an incident she reported as assault. Fliegelman was banned from campus for two years before returning to teach. Investigation summary Dec. 2, 2017, 3:37 p.m. By Fangzhou Liu ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 1/9 The letter, signed Nov. 27 by Stanford General Counsel Debra Zumwalt J.D. \u201979, was in response to Chu\u2019s request earlier last month to see the report Stanford commissioned on her case in 2000. The University declined to send the full report, citing its standard practices, but provided Chu with a summary of the findings that led to Fliegelman\u2019s suspension. According to Zumwalt\u2019s summary, Chu reported back in 2000 that Fliegelman \u201cengaged in a continuing pattern of sexual talk and comments,\u201d which included phone calls Chu found \u201cunwelcome and disturbing.\u201d \u201cHe left me voice messages about overdosing on male enhancement pills,\u201d Chu wrote in a creative nonfiction piece recently published ( doe-fugues-in-the-key-of-english-major/) in Entropy. \u201cHe shared explicit fantasies with me \u2014 despite my protests.\u201d Fliegelman called his sexual phone calls to Chu \u201cplayful banter\u201d and described his explicit conversations with her similarly, the investigation summary says. Chu, on the other hand, said she felt pressured. According to the letter, Chu said she told Fliegelman that she was uncomfortable and wanted to leave before he initiated \u201coral-genital contact.\u201d The letter stated that the \u201cphysical sexual contact\u201d occurred under \u201ccircumstances that were extremely inappropriate\u201d and that Chu\u2019s consent \u201ccould be questioned.\u201d The investigation also drew on reports from third parties, who said that Chu had described the encounter as non-consensual around the time it happened. But there were no witnesses to the incident of oral-genital contact, Zumwalt wrote, and Fliegelman disputed that he persisted despite Chu\u2019s verbal refusal. Fliegelman was eventually found responsible for sexual harassment and professional misconduct \u2013 but not sexual assault, something Chu questioned in an email Tuesday to Zumwalt and administrators responding to the investigation summary. Chu, now a professor of English at Queens College, disputed Stanford\u2019s account of the oral- genital incident. \u201cThe \u2018contact\u2019 between his body and mine was more extensive than what the summary describes,\u201d Chu wrote in her email. \u201cWhy isn\u2019t the word \u2018rape\u2019 mentioned? He violated the place between my thighs with both his mouth and his genitalia unfortunately remember him shoving his body into mine hate the fact that had to type those words.)\u201d 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 2/9 She also said she recalled Fliegelman making her \u201cstroke\u201d an antique pornographic book. Stanford\u2019s summary mentioned Fliegelman reportedly compelling her to watch porn, something she wrote she did not remember. According to Chu, Fliegelman encouraged her several times to touch rare books in \u201can emotional manner\u201d as part of the process of reading and researching \u2014 something that particularly unsettled her when it involved him physically \u201cguiding\u201d her. \u201cFirst his hands on mine, and then \u2014 spontaneously, he assaulted my ear. My neck. Other parts of my body,\u201d she wrote to The Daily, saying she didn\u2019t resist out of \u201cpetrification.\u201d Chu said that Fliegelman was well aware of her psychological vulnerability at the time, having asked about scars on her wrists and arms. In 1999, she said, she was hospitalized after trying to commit suicide and was diagnosed as bipolar. Origins of investigation Chu\u2019s first advisor at Stanford, Herbert Lindenberger, ultimately reported Fliegelman to the University, as first detailed in New Republic ( Stanford hired an outside law firm to investigate. Lindenberger told The Daily that his report was triggered by Fliegelman\u2019s obvious anxiety that his sexual advances on Chu would be discovered by others. Lindenberger recalled being approached by Fliegelman after an oral exam with Chu went badly: Chu was 40 minutes late and unable to answer a single question. \u201cHe was evidently quite nervous \u2014 in fact, obviously scared of what might do to him,\u201d Lindenberger recalled. \u201cOut of the blue he said to me that Seo-Young had told him she was a virgin and that she was attracted to women. It was clear that he was trying to ward off suspicions that anything sexual had transpired between them.\u201d Lindenberger said he immediately guessed that \u201csomething serious was happening\u201d and called on two senior female professors to work with him and Chu on a \u201ccease-and-desist\u201d letter to Fliegelman. But another graduate student had notified the Dean of the Humanities and Sciences at that point, setting a formal investigation in motion instead, he said. Convening a faculty advisory board to review the case would have required Chu\u2019s participation in the hearing, Stanford spokesperson Lisa Lapin told The Daily. (The full hearing process with the advisory board would have required witnesses, attorneys and cross-examination of the victim.) 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 3/9 Because no faculty board was gathered, Etchemendy made the decision on the case, suspending Fliegelman for two years without pay as recommended by the law firm and banning him from the department. Terms of suspension During the suspension, Fliegelman was allowed access to Stanford libraries and continued to live in off-campus faculty housing he owned. In an email to The Daily, Lindenberger wrote that Fliegelman was given an office in \u201ca prefab building at the edge of campus\u201d where he continued to advise dissertation students during his suspension. Lapin disputed that Fliegelman was provided an office. \u201cYes, he continued to meet with [his advisees],\u201d wrote Lindenberger. \u201cThey were dependent on his help and they would have felt lost if he hadn\u2019t been made available to them. He was the only expert in the department specializing in the early-American literature.\u201d Zumwalt\u2019s letter to Chu also mentions a \u201csignificant financial sanction\u201d against Fliegelman. According to Lapin, Fleigelman took a pay cut on his return and estimated financial losses related to his punishment at $1 million. Chu said Stanford \u201cneeds to make available the details\u201d of the $1 million figure and added that while she does not want money from the University, she has lost both time and money as a result of Fliegelman\u2019s abuse \u2014 \u201cthe medical costs alone have been staggering,\u201d she said. Stanford\u2019s policy on sexual harassment at the time stated that individuals found in violation may be subject to penalties as severe as discharge or expulsion. According to Lapin, Fliegelman could not be dismissed except by a full advisory board process, per University policy on faculty termination in 1999. But Lindenberger recalled being told at the time that Fliegelman\u2019s punishment was the most serious that Stanford had ever imposed in a harassment case. The official censure of Fliegelman was not always echoed by other faculty. Lindenberger said that some of his colleagues believed that Chu \u201cwas to blame\u201d for the incidents of harassment because of her initial enthusiasm for Fliegelman and eagerness to have him as an adviser. However, both Lindenberger and Chu said she was adamant that she was not interested in a sexual relationship from the first. 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 4/9 According to Lindenberger, Fliegelman also had the sympathy of former professors who had known him since he began his Ph.D. at Stanford in the early 1970s \u2014 and who later hired and tenured him upon his graduation. \u201cHis former teachers (of whom was not one) loved him as a person and greatly admired him as a scholar and teacher,\u201d Lindenberger wrote. \u201cThese colleagues had a hard time believing he could do the things he was accused of doing.\u201d But few, if any, of these colleagues knew Chu, then a first-year graduate student who was new to Stanford. Chu says that Stanford English Chair Alex Woloch witnessed some of Fliegelman\u2019s verbal and emotional abuse toward her; in an email to The Daily, she said Woloch was present when Fliegelman \u201cberated\u201d her for wearing thick glasses and joined Fliegelman in yelling at her. In an open letter posted on Facebook, she wondered why Woloch did not intervene. Stanford spokesperson E.J. Miranda told the Mercury News on Woloch\u2019s behalf that Woloch did not know of any sexual harassment on Fliegelman\u2019s part until he learned of the investigation have absolutely no memory of any conversation along these lines,\u201d Woloch said in an email to The Daily, referencing Chu\u2019s allegation that he saw Fliegelman berate her for her glasses. He strongly denied ever having joined Fliegelman in yelling at a student. After the case Lindenberger added that the English department chair of another university attempted to arrange a visiting professorship for Fliegelman because she \u201cfelt sorry\u201d for him. Her efforts were cut short by protests from fellow women faculty, he said. Lenora Warren, an assistant professor of English at Colgate University, recalled hearing rumors about Fliegelman\u2019s misconduct when she visited Stanford as a prospective Ph.D. student in 2006. As a specialist in American and African American literature, she was directed toward Fliegelman and visited his house with other students to tour his library. \u201cThey were still steering female graduate students toward him,\u201d Warren said. \u201cAt the time felt strange, mostly in the way that these rumors were out there, and feeling maybe pressure and knowing that Jay would have been the most appropriate person for me to work with at the time \u2026 and feeling that [didn\u2019t] know if would have options if something happened.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 5/9 \u201cIt just was easier to take the rumors as true and not go there,\u201d she said. She stayed at NYU. New Republic\u2019s article on Fliegelman quoted other women expressing unease about their interactions with Fliegelman. Dawn Coleman, whose dissertation was chaired by Fliegelman and Franco Moretti \u2014 a retired English professor also recently publicly accused ( moretti-span-three-campuses/) of sexual assault \u2014 recalled repeated invitations to meet with Fliegelman for dinner at his house or restaurants during the professor\u2019s ban. \u201cIn retrospect cannot believe that was not given a clear statement of the terms or reasons for his leave when was one of the students most directly affected by it,\u201d Coleman told New Republic. After the Fliegelman case, Etchemendy \u201cdramatically\u201d strengthened Stanford\u2019s policy on sexual misconduct, wrote Lapin. (Etchemendy was unavailable for comment at the time of writing, she said.) Modifications to the policy included an affirmative consent requirement as well as further restrictions even in cases where, unlike in Chu\u2019s, all parties agree the interactions were consensual. In 2013, Stanford prohibited relationships between faculty members and graduate students in their departments; according to a blog post ( by Provost Persis Drell, faculty members found to violate the prohibition may be dismissed. Fliegelman himself remained heavily involved in steering graduate students through the job market for much of his career, volunteering to chair the job placement committee for years in a row, wrote a former graduate student in a tribute ( He held a prominent place in academia through his death in 2007, when the Faculty Senate honored him with a customary memorial resolution praising him as a scholar and mentor. An American Studies award for undergraduate research, now discontinued, was named after him. Today, his rare books collection and personal papers are housed in Stanford\u2019s Special Collections. Law professor Michele Dauber, a vocal critic of Stanford\u2019s sexual assault policies, has called for the Faculty Senate to disavow its memorial to Fliegelman, laud Lindenberger for reporting him and apologize to Chu. She expressed particular disappointment in Etchemendy for joining in the resolution. 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 6/9 \u201cWhat Fliegelman did was monstrous,\u201d she said. \u201cIn my opinion, he never should have been allowed to return to teaching and it is beyond outrageous that he was apparently put in charge of parts of graduate advising.\u201d Lapin wrote that memorial resolutions are not voted upon by the Faculty Senate, complicating an actual repeal of the original. \u201cIt is the equivalent of an obituary in a newspaper,\u201d Lapin wrote. Chu left the Ph.D. program at Stanford after completing her master\u2019s degree. Lindenberger said Chu\u2019s parents and a group of faculty suggested she seek psychological help and that she \u201cmanaged well\u201d in the following year. She taught in a private school in the area and applied to Harvard, where she completed her Ph.D. and moved on to her current position at Queens College. \u201cEverybody knew Fliegelman, but only a few, like me, had worked with Chu,\u201d wrote Lindenberger of Stanford\u2019s English department in 2001. \u201cShe has [since] established an enviable academic career.\u201d On Wednesday, several of Chu\u2019s colleagues wrote an open letter to English Chair Woloch, addressing the University\u2019s recent letter to Chu. Their response, spearheaded by Gloria Fisk \u2014 another English professor at Queens College \u2014 urges the Stanford English department to \u201cdeclare its solidarity\u201d with Chu. As of Monday afternoon the message had gathered over 100 signatures from professors across institutions, including 18 from Stanford alumni and one from a visiting fellow at the Stanford Humanities Center. Fisk said she and her collaborators did not circulate the letter among Stanford professors because they \u201cunderstand there is an internal conversation underway at the department already.\u201d \u201cWe wanted to add to that conversation from our position as colleagues in other institutions, elsewhere,\u201d Fisk said. Fisk sent the message to Woloch and various members of the University administration Monday. \u201cThis is all to say that we see Stanford\u2019s problems as our problems, too,\u201d the letter reads. \u201cAlongside you, we hope to build an institutional culture that protects the right and ability of all of its members to do the work we love.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 7/9 Contact Hannah Knowles at hknowles \u2018at\u2019 stanford.edu. Contact Fangzhou Liu at fzliu96 \u2018at\u2019 stanford.edu. An earlier version of the article incorrectly stated that Fliegelman died in 2008, not 2007, and that the university that offered him a visiting professorship during his suspension was Princeton. In fact, Princeton offered him a position a year before the incidents with Chu; another major university, which Lindenberger chose not to name, was behind the attempted arrangement during Fliegelman\u2019s suspension. Finally, the initial version of this article said that Woloch had no memory of the scene Chu described involving Fliegelman berating her; The Daily failed to include the specific allegation of yelling in its communication with Woloch and has updated the piece to contain his more categorical denial of yelling. The Daily regrets these errors. This post has also been updated to clarify the timeline of the open letter organized by Fisk and to add additional information about it as of Monday. Finally, an update clarifies that Dauber called for a disavowal of Fliegelman\u2019s memorial resolution, rather than a repeal, given the obstacles to the latter action. Fangzhou Liu \u201919 was Vol. 253 Executive Editor; before that, she co-led the news section. She grew up in Singapore and studies computer science and linguistics. Print Article The Stanford Daily ( News (/category/news) University (/news/university-news/) Academics (/category/news/academics-news/) Campus Life (/category/news/campus-life-news/) Graduate Students (/category/news/graduate-students/) Business & Technology (/category/news/business-and- technology-news/) Data (/category/@94305/) Equity Project (/category/equity-project/) Sports (/category/sports) Fall Sports (/category/sports/fall-sports/) Winter Sports (/category/sports/winter-sports/) Spring Sports (/category/sports/spring-sports/) Arts & Life (/category/arts-life) Screen (/category/arts-life/screen/) Culture (/category/arts-life/culture/) Music (/category/arts-life/music-intermission/) Reads (/category/arts-life/reads/) 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 8/9 Opinions (/category/opinions) Columnists (/category/opinions/columnists/) Editorials (/opinions/editorials/) Letters from the Editor (/letters-to-the-community/) Letters to the Editor (/letters-to-the-editor/) Op-Eds (/category/opinions/op-eds/) Grind (/category/thegrind) Humor (/category/humor/) Multimedia (/category/multimedia) Video ( Podcasts ( si=cZWDWKp2SiOotNh4ZqG0xg&nd=1) Cartoons (/category/cartoons/) Graphics (/category/cartoons/) Tech ( Magazine (/category/magazine/) Archives ( (/category/dei) Resources (/campus-resources) About Us (/about) Masthead (/masthead) Alumni ( Print Paper ( ( ( ( ( ( stanford-daily/mycompany/) ( ( ( ( daily/id1341270063) ( id=com.Stanford.Daily.App) \u00a9 2025 Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy/) Accessibility (/accessibility//) Advertise (/advertise/) Proudly Powered by WordPress Donate (/donate/) and support The Daily when you shop on Amazon ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Behind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation 9/9", "7582_102.pdf": "( ( Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct ( (Photo BRODHEAD/University Communications) Stanford on Tuesday moved to strip the name of deceased English professor Jay Fliegelman Ph.D. \u201977, who was accused of sexual assault, from his namesake library collection. The renaming was prompted by four years of advocacy from alumni and law professor Michele Dauber. Privacy - Terms July 9, 2021, 5:10 p.m. By Cameron Ehsan ( Victoria Hsieh ( and Kathryn Zheng ( ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 1/6 The decision comes as the University faces ( heightened scrutiny over how it has honored administrators and faculty members accused of sexual misconduct. Amid activism in May, Provost Persis Drell ordered the removal of a brick on campus that honored former assistant dean Keith Archuleta \u201978, who was arrested ( and sentenced in 1992 for secretly videotaping women students as they undressed. Former graduate student Seo-Young Chu M.A. \u201901 said ( for-jae-in-doe-fugues-in-the-key-of-english-major/) she was sexually harassed and assaulted by Fliegelman, her dissertation advisor, while studying at Stanford. As a graduate student, Chu said that she received ( investigation/) phone calls detailing \u201cexplicit sexual fantasies\u201d and accused Fliegelman of initiating unwanted sexual contact. Fliegelman at the time described the calls and conversations with Chu as \u201cplayful banter\u201d and denied allegations of sexual contact. After another faculty member reported the allegation, Fliegelman was suspended ( against-sexual-misconduct-by-professors) for two years without pay in 2000 by then- provost John Etchemendy. An investigation led by Etchemendy found Fliegelman responsible for sexual harassment and professional misconduct, but not sexual assault. Fliegelman did not face criminal charges for his actions. Fliegelman retained access to University-sponsored housing and the libraries. He returned to his teaching position after his suspension ended in 2002. \u201cI\u2019m angry that two decades after Jay Fliegelman was punished by his own university for what he did to me am still cleaning up the mess that he and Stanford created,\u201d Chu said. Stanford spokesperson E.J. Miranda wrote in a statement that \u201cthe university takes matters of sexual misconduct very seriously and we are pleased that we have been able to resolve this situation.\u201d The Fliegelman Collection, which had been stored in Green Library\u2019s Special Collections, \u201cno longer exists,\u201d Miranda confirmed. The books in the collection will be temporarily unavailable until the process of removing the name is complete. ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 2/6 Following his death in 2007, Fliegelman was commemorated with a Faculty Senate memorial resolution and an undergraduate studies award \u2014 honors that some faculty members say should be rescinded year later, the University acquired ( the Fliegelman Collection, a selection of books in his personal library, for an undisclosed price. Fliegelman was a renowned collector and the special collection included 258 volumes, some of which belonged to historical figures such as Charles Dickens, George Washington and John Quincy Adams. Dauber, a vocal critic of Stanford\u2019s sexual assault policies, played a central role in facilitating the removal of the library collection and the brick. \u201cRegrettably, it took Stanford four long years to do the right thing during which fear that Professor Chu was repeatedly re-traumatized by Stanford,\u201d Dauber wrote in a statement. \u201cStanford evidently wanted to get its hands on Fliegelman\u2019s valuable collection of books at a bargain price, and it was evidently willing to launder Fliegelman\u2019s dirty reputation to get them.\u201d Dauber added that those involved in facilitating the acquisition of the collection \u201cshould be held accountable.\u201d Chu criticized the University for its lack of transparency, which she said resulted in the burden being placed on herself and others to push for the renaming of the collection. \u201cStanford creates traumatized alumni,\u201d she said continue to receive messages from other alumni who were violated by people in positions of power at Stanford.\u201d Archuleta brick removal Although it took more than four years for the University to remove Fliegelman\u2019s name from the collection after Chu\u2019s initial request, action on the Archuleta brick was far more swift. After Dauber and comparative literature professor David Palumbo-Liu notified the provost of the brick on campus, Drell replied in an email several weeks later that Archuleta\u2019s donation was returned and the brick was removed. The University \u201cactively addressed this concern when it was brought to our attention,\u201d Miranda wrote in a separate statement. Archuleta is prohibited from participating in future Stanford events, Miranda added. ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 3/6 Archuleta resigned his University post in 1992 after his arrest and was sentenced to four years of probation and community service for videotaping 11 women students as they undressed inside his campus apartment. He invited the women to his apartment under the pretense of a photo shoot for a poetry book, the police said at the time of his arrest University official said ( at the time of Archuleta\u2019s resignation that the former assistant dean\u2019s contact with the Stanford community was \u201cpermanently severed.\u201d Archuleta acknowledged ( that he would \u201cnever regain the trust of the community\u201d and that the \u201cdamage is irreparable.\u201d That was the case until two months ago, when a brick with Archuleta\u2019s name appeared outside the Black Community Services Center. Archuleta was also reportedly spotted at recent Stanford Alumni Association events. In an open letter to Archuleta in June, Rachel Hartshorn \u201992, one of the women Archuleta indecently videotaped, wrote ( secret-videos-of-women-is-back-on-campus-30-years-later-and-so-i-wrote-him-this- 8043aeaae96b) that he had \u201csexually violated\u201d her. \u201cYou committed a sex crime, Keith,\u201d she said in the letter. \u201cSo, would you please be straight with me all these years after sneakily videotaping me in my undies? Why didn\u2019t you stay away?\u201d Archuleta did not return a request for comment. Both the brick and the library collection \u201care essentially part of the same story \u2014 victims of sexual misconduct coming forward years later to demand that Stanford stop honoring their perpetrators,\u201d Dauber said. This article has been updated to clarify that the University \u201cactively addressed\u201d concerns about the Archuleta brick, not the library collection. Cameron Ehsan is a junior at Stanford studying neurobiology. He served as a news editor and newsroom development director for Vol. 261 and was the Vol. 260 winter managing editor. Victoria Hsieh '24 is a Desk Editor for the Business and Technology Desk looking to major in Computer Science and minor in Political Science. She is from Seattle and thereby a caffeine and hiking fanatic. Contact The Daily\u2019s News section at news \u2018at\u2019 stanforddaily.com. Kathryn Zheng \u201924 is from New Jersey. She is majoring in Economics and currently writes for Arts and Life as a columnist under the Culture desk. Print Article ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 4/6 15 days ago Former U.S. Ambassador Michael McFaul and investigative journalist \u2026 Russia experts decode Russia experts decode Trump-Putin dynamics Trump-Putin dynamics 15 days ago In a panel discussion on Wednesday sponsored by the department of \u2026 Scholars Scholars emphasize emphasize importance importance of of gender, gender, \u2026 \u2026 10 days ago Anum argues that Trump's order divides immigrants and creates uncertainty, \u2026 Naturalized But Not Naturalized But Not Accepted Accepted 7 days ago The letter gives Sta days to comply wit orders or \u201cface pot orders orders halt halt conscious conscious practi practi The Stanford Daily Comment Policy Please read our Comment Policy before commenting. Got it What do you think? 0 Responses Comments and reactions for this thread are now closed. Share Best Newest Oldest Upvote 0 Funny 0 Love 0 Surprised 0 Angry 0 Sad 0 \u00d7 0 Comments \ue603 1 Login \uf109 The Stanford Daily ( News (/category/news) University (/news/university-news/) Academics (/category/news/academics-news/) Campus Life (/category/news/campus-life-news/) Graduate Students (/category/news/graduate-students/) Business & Technology (/category/news/business-and- technology-news/) Data (/category/@94305/) Equity Project (/category/equity-project/) Sports (/category/sports) Fall Sports (/category/sports/fall-sports/) Winter Sports (/category/sports/winter-sports/) Spring Sports (/category/sports/spring-sports/) Arts & Life (/category/arts-life) Screen (/category/arts-life/screen/) Culture (/category/arts-life/culture/) Music (/category/arts-life/music-intermission/) Reads (/category/arts-life/reads/) ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 5/6 Opinions (/category/opinions) Columnists (/category/opinions/columnists/) Editorials (/opinions/editorials/) Letters from the Editor (/letters-to-the-community/) Letters to the Editor (/letters-to-the-editor/) Op-Eds (/category/opinions/op-eds/) Grind (/category/thegrind) Humor (/category/humor/) Multimedia (/category/multimedia) Video ( Podcasts ( si=cZWDWKp2SiOotNh4ZqG0xg&nd=1) Cartoons (/category/cartoons/) Graphics (/category/cartoons/) Tech ( Magazine (/category/magazine/) Archives ( (/category/dei) Resources (/campus-resources) About Us (/about) Masthead (/masthead) Alumni ( Print Paper ( ( ( ( ( ( stanford-daily/mycompany/) ( ( ( ( daily/id1341270063) ( id=com.Stanford.Daily.App) \u00a9 2025 Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy/) Accessibility (/accessibility//) Advertise (/advertise/) Proudly Powered by WordPress Donate (/donate/) and support The Daily when you shop on Amazon ( ( 2/22/25, 10:24 Stanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct 6/6", "7582_103.pdf": "View Commons Activity Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601) (she/her/hers) Associate Professor, English Hear my name: The 20th century, the 21st century, the 22nd century, aesthetics, Asian American studies, close reading, cultural theory, design fiction, digital writing, disability studies, experimental writing, genre, the gothic, han/hwabyung, image descriptions, the Koreas, literary theory, lyric poetry, #MeToo, mental illness, modernism, rape studies, rhetoric, science fiction, theory, trauma, ungrading Website Education B.A. Yale, 1999 M.A. Stanford, 2001 Ph.D. Harvard, 2007 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 1/40 Seo-Young Chu Associate Professor Department of English Queens College [email protected] ORCID: Education B.A. Yale, 1999 M.A. Stanford, 2001 Ph.D. Harvard, 2007 Interests The 20th century, the 21st century, the 22nd century, aesthetics, Asian American studies, close reading, cultural theory, design fiction, digital writing, disability studies, experimental writing, genre, the gothic, han/hwabyung, image descriptions, the Koreas, literary theory, lyric poetry, #MeToo, mental illness, modernism, rape studies, rhetoric, science fiction, theory, trauma, ungrading Refuge for Jae-in Doe and Other Fugues. Forthcoming. Punctum Books. Late 2025/early 2026. \u2013 Sundress Publications 2024 Prose Semifinalist Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep Science-Fictional Theory of Representation. Harvard University Press. 2011 WRITING, ETC. \u201cClosely Associated: The Metonymic Logic of Rape Culture.\u201d New Rape Studies. Under contract. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 2/40 \u201cDescribing DICTEE.\u201dPaideuma: Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics. Vol. 49. Summer 2024. \u201cDifferentially Unwell: On Mimi Kh\u00fac\u2019s dear elia.\u201d The Los Angeles Review of Books. March 5, 2024. \u201cYou Are Invited Conversation on Sexual Violence in Asian America.\u201d Co-authored with Thaomi Michelle Dinh. Amerasia Journal. January 18, 2024. \u201cSurvivor-Shaped Specters and Gaps.\u201d Callisto. January 11, 2024. \u201cExcerpts from an Anti-Standardized \u2018\uc218\ub2a5 Design-Fictional Approach to Korea.\u201d Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, volume. 34, number 2. Edited by Haerin Shin and Sang-Keun Yoo. Fall 2023. \u201cJogakpo Window (7 feet x 4 feet).\u201d ctrl+v. Issue 12. 2023. \u201cI, Discomfort Woman Fugue in Minor.\u201d The Margins/Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop. February 21, 2023. \u2013 Nominated for Best of the Net. \u201cDear Stanford: You must reckon with your history of sexual violence.\u201d The Stanford Daily. July 2022. \u201cImagining an Asian American Superhero of North Korean Origin.\u201d Asian American Literature in Transition: 1996-2020. Edited by Betsy Huang and Victor Roman Mendoza. Cambridge University Press. 2021. \u2013 Korean translation here: \uc544\uacc4-\ubbf8\uad6d\uc778-\uc288\ud37c\ud788\uc5b4\ub85c\ub97c-\uc0c1\uc0c1\ud558\uae30-\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 See You and You See Me.\u201d Contributing writer (see the section on \u201cSeo-Young\u201d). Queens Theatre. 2021. \u201cTiny Art Museum for the Floater in My Eye.\u201d ASAP/Journal. Volume 5, Number 5. September 2020. \u201cTranslator of Soliloquies: Fugues in the Key of Dissociation.\u201d Chapbook. Black Warrior Review 46.2. Spring 2020. \u201cDream Life of Waste: Archaeologies of the Soul in the Key of Capitalism.\u201d Nat. Brut. Issue 13. Fall 2019. \u2013 Nominated for Best of the Net. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 3/40 \u201cDream of the Ambassador, 12/21/2016,\u201d \u201cThe Lyric We,\u201d \u201cTwo Koreas, in the Key of Emily Dickinson\u201d (poems). Newtown Literary, Issue 14, Spring/Summer 2019. \u2013 Poems performed at the 9th Annual New York City Poetry Festival, July 27th + 28th, 2019, Governors Island. \u201cAre Postmodernism and #MeToo Incompatible?\u201d The Chronicle Review, Chronicle of Higher Education. Jun 14, 2019. \u201cEmoji Poetics.\u201d ASAP/Journal. Volume 4, Number 2. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press. May 2019. \u201cFree Indirect Suicide: An Unfinished Fugue in Minor.\u201d The Rumpus. March 26th, 2019. \u2013 Listed among \u201cNotable Essays & Literary Nonfiction\u201d in Best American Essays 2020. \u2013 Nominated for a Best of the Net 2019 award \u201cThe Responds.\u201d Telos. Special Issue on Korea. Ed. Haerin Shin. Fall 2018. \u201cAfter Refuge for Jae-in Doe Social Media Chronology Journal. March 15, 2018 Refuge for Jae-in Doe: Fugues in the Key of English Major,\u201d Entropy. November 3, 2017. \u2013 Selected by Entropy editors as the best essay published in 2017. \u2013 Named most-read piece of all time in Entropy \u2013 Selected for inclusion in the Best American Nonrequired Reading 2018. \u2013 Selected for inclusion in Best American Experimental Writing 2020. \u2013 Selected for inclusion in Advanced Creative Nonfiction (2021). \u2013 Excerpt reprinted in Journal of Asian American Studies, Johns Hopkins University Press, Volume 24, Number 1, February 2021, p. 113. \u201cGeneration Hwabyung Telepathy\u201d and Resume of Traumas,\u201d published as part of a Testimonial Tapestry in Asian American Literary Review, Special Issue on Mental Health: Open In Emergency. Ed. Mimi Kh\u00fac. 2017. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 4/40 \u201cM\u2019\uc5b4\uba38\ub2c8.\u201d Kartika Review. March 2017. \u201cActs of Postmemory Han in the Key of the Children Will Never Have.\u201d Hawaii Review. 2017. \u201cWhat is the maiden name of Frankenstein\u2019s creature?\u201d and am Korean American.\u201d Mithila Review. 2016. \u201cLife 38.\u201d Mithila Review. Aug 8, 2016. \u2013 Featured as a Research Spotlight on Knowledge Commons. \u201cI, Stereotype: Detained in the Uncanny Valley.\u201d Techno-Orientalism: Imagining Asia in Speculative Fiction, History, and Media. Edited by David S. Roh, Betsy Huang, and Greta A. Niu. Rutgers University Press. 2015. \u201c\u221a-1, Other.\u201d Science Fiction Studies. Vol. 42. Number 2. July 2015. \u201cChogakpo Fantasia.\u201d And/Or. 2015. \u201cScience-Fictional North Korea Defective History.\u201d Deletion: The Open Access Online Forum In Science Fiction Studies. Ed. Marleen Barr. April 2014. \u201cWelcome to The Vegas Pyongyang.\u201d Science Fiction Studies. 39.3. Special issue focusing on globalization. Eds. David Higgins and Rob Latham. 2012. \u201cScience Fiction and Lyric Poetry.\u201d Sense of Wonder Century of Science Fiction. Edited by Leigh Grossman. 2011 10.2. 2010. \u201cDystopian Surface, Utopian Dream: Wittman Ah Sing Foresees Postethnic Humanity New Literary History of America. Eds. Greil Marcus and Werner Sollors. Harvard UP. 2009. \u201cScience Fiction and Postmemory Han in Contemporary Korean American Literature (Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States) 33.4. \u201cAlien/Asian: Imagining the Racialized Future.\u201d Ed. Stephen Hong Sohn. 2008. \u2013 Note: \u201cScience Fiction and Postmemory Han\u201d has been cited by Amanda Gorman in Call Us What We Carry. \u201cHwabyung Fragments.\u201d Segue 5.2. 2006. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 5/40 \u201cDickinson and Mathematics.\u201d The Emily Dickinson Journal 15.1. 2006. \u201cHypnotic Ratiocination.\u201d The Edgar Allan Poe Review.Vol. 6, No. 1 2005 The Poetics of Image Descriptions: Lyricism, Speculative Writing, and Ocularly Estranging Referents Book of Alt Text Poems Conversation on Sexual Violence in Asian America\u201d (Center for the Study of Race, Politics, and Culture at the University of Chicago TV: Robot Coda\u201d (Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop) \u201cBeyond the Catastrophic Origins of the Korean DMZ\u201d / \u201cThe Human Rights of a No- Man\u2019s Land\u201d (Queens College, CUNY, and Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand) \u201cKorean American #MeToo\u201d (Korean American Story) \u201cHow #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser\u201d (New York Magazine) \u201cMy Professional World Has Gotten Smaller\u201d (Chronicle of Higher Education TRAUMA\u201d (Connecticut Office of the Arts) \u201cOn Audio Descriptions and Anti-Asian Violence\u201d (MLA) \u201cSeo-Young discusses her struggles at Yale, stress culture, and gives some advice and perspective\u201d (Elis for Rachael) Seo-Young Chu on \u201cDo Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep?\u201d (TTBOOK) \u201cTransnational Dialogue on Science Fiction\u201d (Kaya Press) \u201cUtopias Misplaced: The Cost of Outsourcing Dystopian Poetics to North Korea\u201d (Yale University) 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 6/40 Co-Organizer, Harvard Diversity Discussions, \u201cRace and Disability: Intersections and Identities.\u201d Organized by Jenny Korn. Scheduled for Tuesday July 8, 2025. Co-panelist, \u201cYou Are Invited: Teaching Sexual Violence in Asian America.\u201d Association for Asian American Studies Annual Conference 2025. Scheduled for Sat Apr 19, 2025 2:45pm \u2013 4:15pm was accepted as a speaker but cannot attend the conference in person due to financial difficulties. Invited Speaker, University of Zurich, Switzerland. \u201cTheorizing Image Descriptions: Literature And/As Alt Text.\u201d June 2024. Roundtable panelist, \u201cCreativity and Critique in Asian American Literature Critical Methods Roundtable\u201d at Virtual Conference 2024: (June 7, 2024). Invited Guest Speaker, \u201cOne in Five: The Law, Policy, and Politics of Campus Sexual Assault.\u201d Professor Alyssa Burgart. Stanford University. May 2024. Invited Guest Speaker, \u201cSexual Violence in Asian America,\u201d Professor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, Stanford University. May 2024. Co-Organizer, Harvard Diversity Discussions, \u201cRace and Mental Health: Cultural Conceptions.\u201d Organized by Jenny Korn \u201998), Ngozi Okose \u201918), Darold Cuba \u201921), Dr. Seo-Young Chu 2003 2007 2008), and Eisha Khan \u201922). Thursday, November 9, 2023, 5-6 pm Eastern. Zoom. Storytelling Slam Finalist, \u201cCalling on the Power of My Mother\u2019s Voice Code- Switching Performance,\u201d Harvard Asian American Alumni Alliance, fall 2023. Cambridge, MA. Invited Guest Speaker, \u201cSexual Violence in Asian America,\u201d Professor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, Stanford University. May 2023. Invited Guest Speaker, \u201cOne In Five.\u201d Professor Michele Dauber and Professor Alyssa Burgart. Stanford University. February 2023. Invited participant/interlocutor TRAUMA.\u201d Organized by Joan Kwon Glass. Five Asian American writers read from their work & dialogue with one another on the issue of generational trauma. May 12 2022. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 7/40 Invited participant/interlocutor, class on gender and sexual violence in Asian America, Professor Thaomi Michelle Dinh, University of Chicago, May 14 2022. \u201cBeyond the Catastrophic Origins of the Korean DMZ,\u201d Queens College, May 6 2022 Guest lecture, Professor Michele Dauber\u2019s class on campus assault, Stanford Law School, 9 Feb. 2022. \u201dAudio Description and Anti-Asian American Violence,\u201d given at 2022 session, Anti-Asian American Violence, 8 Jan. 2022 (online). \u201cImagining an Asian American Superhero of North Korean Origin: a Design Fiction,\u201d presented at the and Geopolitical Aesthetics conference, the 2nd Sungkyun Annual International Forum on Cultural Studies, held at Sung Kyun Kwan University, Seoul, Korea, 10-11 Dec. 2021 (online). \u2013 Featured as a Research Spotlight on Knowledge Commons. Speaker. \u201cRoundtable on Korean Diasporas,\u201d organized by Professor Dougal McNeill, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, 10 Nov. 2021 (online). Moderator and interlocutor Transnational Dialogue on Science Fiction.\u201d Nalo Hopkinson and Kim Bo-Young, moderated by Seo-Young Chu, with Sunyoung Park and Jungmin Lee also participating. Organized by Queens College and Kaya Press, 30 Oct. 2021 (online). Co-panelist dialogue among the contributors (Thaomi Michelle Dinh, Brian Dan Trinh, Mashuq Mushtaq Deen, Seo-Young Chu, Margaret Rhee) to #WeToo, a collection of essays, poems, creative nonfiction, and experimental works, published by the Journal of Asian American Studies (2021). Organized by the Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop, 12 July 2021. Co-panelist. Panel on Godzilla. Panelist. Big Apple Comic Con. Spring 2019. Co-panelist. Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop Robot Coda, Intersection of Love, Race, and Technology,\u201d 10 May 2018. Speaker. \u201cSlow and Other Forms of Violence in The Three-Body Problem.\u201d Brandeis Novel Symposium , 20-21 Apr. 2018. Keynote speaker. \u201cVocation and Catastrophe.\u201d Keynote Speech at 2018 Conference on \u201cCatastrophe! Living and Thinking through the End Time,\u201d Indiana University, 30-31 Mar. 2018. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 8/40 Keynote speaker. \u201cThe Square Root of Negative Korea,\u201d a Special Guest Lecture Organized by Graduate Student English Association, University of California, Riverside, 8 Feb. 2018. \u201cNorth Korean Vibes, Korean American Pronouns,\u201d Language, Translation, and Global Scale, Oct. 26, 2017, ASAP/9, The Arts of the Present, 26-28 Oct. 2017 , hosted by the University of California, Berkeley. \u201cEx Hallyu draft chapter for Against Unification of the Koreas. Presented at Science-Fiction and Chinese Literature Workshop, Fudan University, at the invitation of International Center for the Studies of Chinese Civilization, Jun. 2016. \u201dBIOATO: Beauty, Its Opposite, and Their Others.\u201d Queens College, CUNY, English Honors Program Annual Conference. Co-organizer, performer, interlocutor, designer, May (the 4th!), 2016. \u201cNotes on How to Teach Videogames.\u201d Faculty Seminar. Queens College English Department. CUNY, 21 Apr. 2016. \u201dUtopias Misplaced: The Cost of Outsourcing Dystopian Poetics to North Korea.\u201d Lecture invited by Professor John Rogers . Franke Lectures in the Humanities, Whitney Humanities Center. Yale University, 20 Nov. 2014. The video can be found here: \u2013 Featured as a Research Spotlight on Knowledge Commons. \u201cAgainst Unification of the Koreas.\u201d Conference titled \u201d Against\u2026Genre, History, Nation.\u201d Queens College, CUNY, 27 Oct. 2014. \u201cFrom Desertitis to Jamais Vu: Symptoms of the Future of the Korean in Dance Dance Revolution by Cathy Park Hong.\u201d Modern Language Association (MLA) Annual Convention. Chicago, IL, 11 Jan. 2014. \u201dThe Spacetime of the DMZ: Quantum North Korea and Geomantic Black Holes.\u201d Talk invited by Professor Brian McHale, Director of Project Narrative. The Ohio State University, 14 Oct. 2013. \u201dGlobal and Science-Fictional Dimensions of the Korean Demilitarized Zone.\u201d Talk invited by Professor Carol Dougherty and Professor Mingwei Song. Symposium on Global Science Fiction. The Newhouse Center for the Humanities at Wellesley College, 8-9 Mar. 2013. \u201cThe Poetics of Defection in the Artwork of Song Byeok and Sun Mu.\u201d Session title: \u201cPast and Future in North Korean Literature and Culture.\u201d Modern Language 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 9/40 Association (MLA) Annual Convention. Boston, MA, 4 Jan. 2013. Renaissance Weekend. Invited participant. Monterey Bay, CA, 30 Jun.-4 Jul. 2012. \u201cRe-Humanizing the North Korean Chimera in I\u2019m a Cyborg, But That\u2019s (\uc2f8\uc774\ubcf4\uadf8 \uc9c0\ub9cc \uad1c\ucc2e\uc544).\u201d New Jersey College English Association (NJCEA) 35th Annual Spring Conference. Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, 14 Apr. 2012. \u201cLiteral and Figurative Aspects of the DMZ.\u201d Lecture invited by the Hunter College Graduate English Club. Hunter College, CUNY, 22 Mar. 2012. \u201cThe Detention of Ethnic Stereotypes in the Uncanny Valley.\u201d Session arranged by the Society for Critical Exchange. Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) Annual Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 8 Apr. 2011. \u201dNorth Korea and Science Fiction.\u201d Lecture invited by Professor Sukhdev Sandhu. Program in Asian/Pacific/American Studies. New York University, 28 Feb. 2011 Poetics of Documentary Fantasy: Yong Soon Min\u2019s Defining Moments.\u201d Modern Language Association (MLA) Annual Convention. Los Angeles , 8 Jan. 2011. \u201cScience-Fictional North Korea.\u201d American Comparative Literature Association (ACLA) Annual Conference. Cambridge, MA, 29 Mar. 2009. \u201cThe and Other Ghostly \u2018Heartlands\u2019 of Korean America .\u201d Association for Asian American Studies (AAAS) Annual Conference. Chicago, IL, 19 Apr. 2008. \u201dRobot Rights and the Uncanny Valley.\u201d Panel arranged by the Literature and Science Area of the American Culture Association. Popular Culture Association / American Culture Association National Conference. Boston, MA. 7 Apr. 2007. \u201cScience Fiction and Music.\u201d Science Fiction Research Association (SFRA) 37th Annual Conference. White Plains, NY, 24 Jun. 2006. \u201cMaxine Hong Kingston\u2019s Tripmaster Monkey.\u201d Guest lecture for \u201cLiterature of Migration and Ethnicity: The Case of the United States.\u201d Harvard University. Cambridge, MA, 10 Apr. 2006. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 10/40 \u201cUnnarratable Desire: Nightwood, A.D.\u2019s Afterlife, and The Well of Loneliness.\u201d Panel arranged by the Society for the Study of Narrative Literature. Modern Language Association (MLA) Annual Convention.Washington, DC, 30 Dec. 2005. \u201cHypnotic Ratiocination.\u201d Panel arranged by the Poe Studies Association Annual Convention. Philadelphia, PA, 30 Dec. 2004. \u201cRobot Onomatopoeia: D.H. Lawrence, Futurism, and Edison\u2019s Talking Doll.\u201d Modernist Studies Association (MSA), Sixth Annual Conference. Vancouver, BC, 24 Oct. 2004. \u201cDickinson and Mathematics.\u201d Panel arranged by the Dickinson International Society. American Literature Association (ALA) Annual Conference. San Francisco, CA, 27 May 2004. \u201cDislocation and Echolocation: Theresa Hak Kyung Cha\u2019s Dictee.\u201d American Comparative Literature Association (ACLA) Annual Conference. Ann Arbor, MI, 16 Apr. 2004. \u201cInstant Messenger Dialogue: An Experimental Performance.\u201d Addressing Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference. Harvard University. Cambridge, MA, 9 Apr. 2004. \u201cVoice, Identity, and Onomatopoeia: Dictee.\u201d Association for Asian American Studies (AAAS) Annual Conference. Boston, MA, 27 Mar. 2004. \u201cEarly American Knowledge.\u201d American Literature Association (ALA) Annual Conference. Cambridge, MA, 22 May 2003. \u201cStill Life of Humanoid Robot: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and We Can Build You.\u201d Still Life Graduate Student Conference. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 21 Mar. 2003. \u201cNarrating the Afterlife of World War I: Last and First Men.\u201d Panel arranged by the Discussion Group on Science Fiction and Utopian and Fantastic Literature Annual Convention. New York, NY, 27 Dec. 2002. \u201cThe League of Nations and \u2018An Americanized Planet.\u2019\u201d American Studies Association (ASA) Annual Convention. Houston, TX, 16 Nov. 2002. \u201cThe Displacement of Cyberspace Annual Conference. San Juan, PR, 12 Apr. 2002. \u201cThe Oracle and the Artifact: William Gibson\u2019s Science Fiction.\u201d 20th-Century 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 11/40 Literature and Cultural Theory Colloquium. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 15 Mar. 2002. \u201cCyberspace Materialized: From the Sprawl Series to the Bridge Trilogy.\u201d ALA. Conference on Contemporary American Literature. Santa Fe, NM, 27 Oct. 2001 (once, twice, or more English 151W: Readings in British Literature English 165H: Introduction to Poetry English 170W: Introduction to Literary Study English 243: Genre English 244: Theory English 255: Global Literatures in English English 314: Theorizing Popular Culture English 369: Asian American Literature English 379: The Korean and Its Others English 391W: Science Fiction English 399H: Honors Seminar on Aesthetics: Beauty, Its Opposites, and their Others English 636: History of Literary Criticism English 733: Asian American Literature \u201cAmerican Visions and Voices,\u201d History and Literature, 2008-2009. \u201cAmerican Characters,\u201d History and Literature, 2007-2008. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 12/40 \u201cTransnational Modernism,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, fall 2007. \u201cScience Fiction,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2006. \u201cLesbian Gothic,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2005. \u201cThe Asian American Literary Canon,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, fall 2004. \u201cAsian American Literature,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2004 \u201cThe Hero We Create: 9/11 and the Reinvention of Batman,\u201d Joshua Feblowitz, History and Literature, 2008-2009. \u201cClassical Music and Film: An Analysis of How 2001 Space Odyssey Popularized Also Sprach Zarathustra in American Society,\u201d Kyle Wiggins, History and Literature, 2008- 2009. \u201cRobert Johnson and His Journey through Modern Prose and Poetry,\u201d Aubrie Pagano, History and Literature, 2007-2008. \u201cGiving Back the Name: Sanora Babb\u2019s Insight into Feminism and Environmentalism,\u201d Rikka Strong, History and Literature, 2007-2008 \u201cLiterature of Migration and Ethnicity: The Case of the United States,\u201d Professor Werner Sollors, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2006. \u201cThe Nineteenth-Century Novel,\u201d Professor Elaine Scarry, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2005. \u201cPutting Modernism Together,\u201d Professor Daniel Albright, Core Curriculum, fall 2004. \u201cModern British Fiction,\u201d Professor Peter Nohrnberg, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2004. \u201cThe Elements of Rhetoric,\u201d Professor James Engell, English and American Literature and Language, fall 2003. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 13/40 UNIVERSITY: \u201cAmerican Literature and Culture to 1855,\u201d Professor Jay Fliegelman (who sexually harassed and raped me while was his advisee, teaching assistant, and teaching observee), winter 2000 had just turned 22 years old was naive and inexperienced was a first-year graduate student, new to the profession, new to teaching, new to California, new to Stanford. He was tenured. He was powerful. He was in his 50s. He had been a Stanford institution for decades. This is disjointed because I\u2019m re-living it all over again. Shortly after he violated me was hospitalized. Shortly after was discharged from the hospital gave a guest lecture on Seneca Falls and women\u2019s rights. His response was to tell me forgot to mention women\u2019s right to sexual pleasure. There are gaps here because trauma is nonlinear, trauma broke my sense of time. At some point Stanford conducted an investigation. As a result of the investigation, which was a brutal experience, Stanford punished my abuser by suspending him for two years without pay. Some of his colleagues had the audacity to blame me for the whole situation. I\u2019m angry. I\u2019m experimenting with incorporating my anger into this CV. The truth is that my career started with rape. My career is a product of rape. My career has been shaped by rape. My sense of who am as an academic: shaped by rape. The gaps in my are trauma- generated plot holes that lead to Northern California in the year 2000 \u201cProfessor Spotlight: Professor Seo-Young Chu\u201d by Aliyah Ali. The Knight News. December 5, 2023 Abnormal Mapping, Starboard Vineyard Tours 9: Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep Science-Fictional Theory of Representation, Chu. Podcast hosts: Ben Klug and Mark Sokolov. Mar 18, 2024. dream-of-literal-sleep \u201cHow The Memory Police Makes You See.\u201d By Jia Tolentino. The New Yorker: police-makes-you-see Cover Interview by ROROTOKO. \u201d The Double Lives of Metaphors, Robots, and Other Science-Fictional/Lyric Figures.\u201d Cutting-Edge Intellectual Interview, edited by Erind Pajo. Web. 20 Jun. 2011. Radio Interview with Jim Fleming. \u201cSeo-Young Chu on Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep?\u201d Program Title: The Language of Science Fiction . To the Best of Our Knowledge ). Distributed by Public Radio International, Web. 25 Sept. 2011 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 14/40 Broadway World Daily Queens Daily Eagle \u2013 \u201cFlash of Remembrance: The Multiplicities of Ed Park\u201d By Alisyn Amant. March 2024. Multiplicities-of-Ed-Park \u201cGhost From the Past: Professor\u2019s essay about being harassed and raped by her late adviser sparks calls for public acknowledgment of the reasons for his past suspension from Stanford and the renaming of a disciplinary society mentorship award that bore his name.\u201d By Colleen Flaherty (November 9, 2017). professor-sparks-call-public-acknowledgment-stanford-and \u201c2 Women Say Stanford Professors Raped Them Years Ago.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 11, 2017). professors-raped-them-years-ago/ \u201cEnglish faculty told to redirect press questions on sexual assault allegations to University communications.\u201d By Brian Contreras (Nov. 13, 2017, 1:00 a.m.). questions-on-sexual-assault-allegations-to-university-communications \u201cSexual Harassment and Assault in Higher Ed: What\u2019s Happened Since Weinstein.\u201d By Nell Gluckman , Brock Read, Bianca Quilantan, and Katherine Mangan 13, 2017). assault-in-higher-ed-whats-happened-since-weinstein \u201cEditorial Board: Let\u2019s hold faculty to a higher standard on sexual assault.\u201d Opinion by Vol. 252 Editorial Board (Nov. 14, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). higher-standard-on-sexual-assault/ \u201cHere\u2019s What Sexual Harassment Looks Like in Higher Education.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 16, 2017). sexual-harassment-looks-like-in-higher-education/ 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 15/40 \u201cOpen Letter from Alumni to Stanford: Not in Our Name.\u201d by 22, 2017). in-our-name Professor Is Kind of Like a Priest\u2019: Two recent cases reveal how the structure of American graduate schools enables sexual harassment and worse.\u201d By Irene Hsu and Rachel Stone (Nov. 30, 2017). New Republic. \u201cStanford: Sexual misconduct revelation exposes storied professor\u2019s secret.\u201d (Dec. 1, 2017). revelation-exposes-storied-professors-secret/ \u201cBehind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation.\u201d By Fangzhou Liu (Dec. 2, 2017, 3:37 p.m.). sexual-misconduct-investigation/ \u201cFormer students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 3, 2017). \u201cAn open letter to Stanford on sexual harassment in academia.\u201d Opinion by Gloria Fisk and From the Community (Dec. 5, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). harassment-in-academia/ NOTE: Professor Alex Woloch has yet to respond. \u201cWhat Happens When Sex Harassment Disrupts Victims\u2019 Academic Careers.\u201d By Nell Gluckman 6, 2017). when-sex-harassment-disrupts-victims-academic-careers/ \u201cFormer Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us.\u201d By Vanessa Ranca\u00f1o (Dec 7, 2017). to-speak-out-against-sexual-misconduct-by-professors \u201c\u2018Fairly Normal and Routine\u2019: 50 Years of Sexual Violence at Stanford.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 31, 2018). \u201cProvost, General Counsel offer personal contributions to anti-sexual assault organization after Stanford denies Fliegelman victim\u2019s request for donation.\u201d By Alex Tsai (Feb. 26, 2018, 12:20 a.m.). general-counsel-offer-personal-contributions-to-anti-sexual-assault- organization-after-stanford-denies-fliegelman-victims-request-for-donation/ \u201cAfter Refuge for Jae-in Doe Social Media Chronology.\u201d By Seo-Young Chu (March 15, 2018). 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 16/40 media-chronology/ \u201cAcademia\u2019s #MeToo moment: \u2018I\u2019m really struck by how endemic this is\u2019: \u2018There isn\u2019t a day in my life when haven\u2019t been eaten away by it in some way.\u2019\u201d By Nick Anderson (May 10, 2018). women-accuse-professors-of-sexual-misconduct/2018/05/10/474102de-2631- 11e8-874b-d517e912f125_story.html \u201c\u2018My Professional World Has Gotten Smaller\u2019: How sexual harassment and assault distort scholars\u2019 lives in the academy.\u201d By Julia Schmalz 11, 2018). \u201cStanford One Year After #MeToo: How Stanford\u2019s Response Failed Victims of Sexual Assault.\u201d By 14, 2019). stanfords-response-failed-victims-of-sexual-assault/ \u201cHow #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser \u2014 Testimonies New York Magazine\u201d (Sep 29, 2019). v=2tVhymU3DcM&list=PLXQRPSEGHTBiFsePIdraK3KNHvXQ1iFaM&index=7 \u201cWas It Worth It?\u201d By Irin Carmon and Amelia Schonbek Additional reporting by Sarah Jones (Sept. 30, 2019). about-sexual-assault-and-what-comes-after.html \u201cTitle at Stanford timeline of recent events.\u201d By Emma Talley, Kate Selig, Sarina Deb, Daniel Wu, Ujwal Srivastava, Lauryn Johnson, Anastasiia Malenko and Danielle Echeverria (June 9, 2020, 11:35 p.m.). ix-at-stanford-a-timeline-of-recent-events/ \u201cStanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct.\u201d By Cameron Ehsan, Victoria Hsieh and Kathryn Zheng (July 9, 2021, 5:10 p.m.). collection-brick/ Seo-Young Chu on sexual violence at Stanford and Korean American # MeToo (March 3, 2022). \u201c\u2018Beef\u2019 Star David Choe Told Story About Sexually Assaulting Someone In Resurfaced 2014 Clip.\u201d By Elyse Wanshel. Apr 17, 2023. \u201cAsian Americans are over just being included \u2014 they\u2019re defining mainstream culture.\u201d By Brahmjot Kaur and Angela Yang. May 12, 2023. \u00ab\u201cWith art, the stakes are always high. When learned that David Choe had bragged about being a \u2018successful 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 17/40 rapist felt violently betrayed,\u201d Chu said feel more solidarity with survivors who were harmed by his words than with the show\u2019s fans and supporters Refuge for Jae-in Doe\u201d has been cited/discussed in/on/by (in alphabetical order\u2014 some are brief citations, others are lengthy discussions, and I\u2019m still trying to figure out what counts as \u201cpress/media\u201d) ABO: Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts, 1640-1830, Fall 2020 American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS) The and the changed the name of mentorship awards. \u201c\u2026 On behalf of our Society, we accept this charge, and we thank Professor Chu and our colleagues for their eloquence and passion in urging us forward Board asecsgradcaucus.wordpress.com/2017/11/11/asecsexecutive-board-statement-on- harassment-and-abuse/amp/, 10 Nov. 2017 12 Nov. 2017 uK5Cbyuq1lAGvYgUiEKy_DTAZg/edit, 10 Nov. 2017 (article by Robert Warrior), 2020 Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop darkness/, 10 Nov. 2017 12/event/519013, 12 Jul. 2021 Chicago Review, 28 Jan 2022 The Chronicle of Higher Education whats-happened-since-weinstein/, 13 Nov. 2017 disrupts-victims-academic-careers/, 6 Dec. 2017 11 Nov. 2017 11 May 2018 Committee on Gender Equality and Diversity at the University of Hong Kong 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 18/40 Cornell University \u201cProceedings of the Consensual Relationship Policy Committee,\u201d 1 May 2018 The Daily Beast, 1 Mar. 2018 Early American Literature: Hutchins, Zach. \u201cThe \u2018Raping Numbers\u2019 of Bradstreet\u2019s Admirers.\u201d Early American Literature. Vol. 55, No. 3 (2020), pp. 623-650. Stable URL: \u201cThe dehumanizing effect of their Petrarchan verse, which objectifies women and converts them into silent, absent, unknowable figures, was recently described to early Americanist readers by Seo- Young Chu, who recounts her rape at the hands of an academic adviser in the moving work of creative nonfiction Refuge for Jae- In Doe: Fugues in the Key of English Major.\u201d7 Chu insists that \u201cthe sonnet was a site of sexual violence. Male poets were rewarded for celebrating the women they hunted.\u201d And in lines that echo Bradstreet\u2019s own characterization of herself as a female deer, Chu writes of herself in the terms of Petrarchan metaphor: Doe: a deer, a female deer\u2014 Often chased by sonneteers of old. Caught, and killed, and bathed in fear, Turned to human blazons to be sold\u2014 (Chu) Like Chu, Bradstreet understood Petrarchan verse as a form of linguistic violence, and her experiments with the sonnet challenge its conventions to legitimize the desires, bodily presence, and subjectivity of women.8 In their formal innovations on the sonnet tradition, Chu and Bradstreet found a means of contesting poetic power structures authorizing the harassment and dehumanization of women.\u201d Frances Kai-Hwa Wang: Resources, 17 May 2022 Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Improving Campus Climate, University of Minnesota, 14 Dec. 2017 Inside Higher Ed. 9 Mpv/ 2017, 9 Nov. 2017 Journal of Asian American Studies 12 Jul 2021 KQED, 7 Dec. 2017 \u201c\u2026 Fliegelman was suspended for two years, \u2026. Then he went back to teaching at Stanford. He was later honored multiple times \u2014 at \u2026 \u201cJayfest\u201d \u2026 when the university acquired his rare book collection, \u2026 The university also named an award in his honor, \u2026 In 2016, the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies also named a mentorship award after Fliegelman. The society renamed it after hearing from Chu\u2026\u201d The Literary Hub, 18 Apr. 2022. \u201cThe Impossible, Crucial Task of Teaching About Rape as a Survivor\u201d by Emily Van Duyne. \u201cChu turned to the sonnet to describe her experience of being first stalked, then transformed from a human woman into an 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 19/40 object. Like others before her\u2014Anne Boleyn, Shakespeare\u2019s \u201cDark Lady\u201d\u2014she transforms, in the course of the sonnet, from a human into a literary device, a blazon: a body stripped of its parts, to be cataloged as a series of rare and beautiful objects\u201d Longreads The Margins (AAWW) The Mercury News, 1 Dec. 2017 \u201c\u2026 But this month, after an explosive series of revelations in an online publication and on Facebook, his legacy \u2014 and an elite university\u2019s role in promoting it \u2014 has been tumbled upside down, exposing a dark underside of how powerful faculty at private institutions can escape public scorn\u2026\u201c Ms. Magazine, 16 Mar. 2018 Neon Books, 3 Sep. 2018 \u201c\u2026 One of the paradoxes of trauma is that it usually begins after a person is out of immediate danger. Like an echo, harm may take time to reach us.\u201c New Chaucer Studies: Pedagogy and Profession, Autumn 2021 New York Magazine sexual-assault-and-what-comes-after, 30 Sep.2019 Video (separate from the article), 30 Sep. 2019 The New Republic, 30 Nov. 2017 PopMatters, 7 Jan. 2019 review of The America\u2019s Best Nonrequired Reading. \u201c\u2026 It\u2019s incredibly hard to take but impossible to ignore and in keeping with the inconsistencies of the series title, this entry is definitely required reading.\u201d Rape Culture and Female Resistance in Late Medieval Literature Society of Early Americanists, 10 Nov. 2017 Stanford Asian Pacific American Alumni Club (SAPAAC) Board, 22 Nov. 2017 investigation/, 2 Dec. 2017 harassment-in-academia/, 5 Dec. 2017 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 20/40 stanford-revises-sexual-harassment-guidelines-webpage-but-criticism-persists/, 18 May 2017 contributions-to-anti-sexual-assault-organization-after-stanford-denies- fliegelman-victims-request-for-donation/, 26 Feb. 2017 over-1000-signatures/, 9 Oct. 2018 9 Jul. 2019 \u201c\u2026Stanford on Tuesday moved to strip the name of deceased English professor Jay Fliegelman Ph.D. \u201977, who was accused of sexual assault, from his namesake library collection. The renaming was prompted by four years of advocacy from alumni and law professor Michele Dauber\u2026 Former graduate student Seo- Young Chu M.A. \u201901 said she was sexually harassed and assaulted by Fliegelman, her dissertation advisor, while studying at Stanford\u2026.\u201c Stanford Politics, 3 Dec. 2017 stanfords-response-failed-victims-of-sexual-assault/ name/ \u201cthe resulting sanction was even said to be the university\u2019s most serious punishment to date, though it wasn\u2019t made public at the time. Stanford suspended English professor Jay Fliegelman and banned him from the department for two years, but few other than the faculty and students who were close to him seemed to know or care why. His graduate student advisee, Seo-Young Chu, had formally accused him of rape. The matter was handled quietly, and the university ultimately behaved as if the rape had never happened, allowing Fliegelman to continue to meet with students during his suspension. After he died in 2007, a glowing memorial resolution was published the next year which described a triumphant career and offered no mention of his censure, let alone the accusation against him. Chu\u2019s memory wasn\u2019t quite so short. In 2017, she published a widely-discussed creative nonfiction piece on the blog Entropy relating her experiences and finally making Fliegelman\u2019s behavior public knowledge. At her request, Stanford also finally published a summary of their 2000 investigation. But for 17 years, that story went untold. The secrecy with which the Fliegelman case was handled raises the question of how many more sexual assault allegations have 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 21/40 been adjudicated behind closed doors. How those proceedings operate has been an ongoing source of controversy at Stanford.\u201d Tulsa Studies in Women\u2019s Literature, Spring 2018 Washington University Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5), 2019 Wendy Beth Hyman. \u201cShakespeare and Metamorphosis.\u201d syllabus-SP-2021.pdf to the Academic Profession, New York/Queens Community, Survivors of Sexual Violence, and Beyond Service at Queens College Asian American Community Studies Minor Affiliated Faculty, 2024 Asian American Community Studies Minor Advisory Board, 2023 Queens Campus Action Team CUNY, 2022- Member of Honors Committee, 2015- . Social Media team, the Queens College chapter of CUNY\u2019s union, PSC-CUNY, 2022- English Department Representative, Annual Undergraduate Open House, fall and spring 2019 Member of Curriculum Committee, 2014- 2015? (Double check). Member of Assessment Committee, 2013- 2014?. Coordinator. English Department Honors Conference. \u201cBIATO: Beauty, Its Opposite, and Their Others,\u201d 4 May 2016. English Department Representative, Freshman Reception, 27 Apr. 2014. English Department Representative, Annual Undergraduate Open House, 3 Nov. 2013. Member of Publicity/Publications Committee, 2010-2011. Member of Honors Committee , 2010-2012. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 22/40 Member of Committee on New Faculty, 2009-2011. Member of Syllabus Committee, 2009-2010. Member of Committee on Special Occasions, 2009-2010. Service at Harvard University Adviser, Board of Freshman Advisers , 2007-2008, 2008-2009. Examiner, Practice General Exams, Department of English and American Literature and Language, 9 Sept. 2005. Coordinator, \u201dAddressing Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference,\u201d 8-9 Apr. 2004. Other Professional Service Mentor, #MeTooAcademia. 2017- Volunteer, Elis For Rachael: Yale Mental Health Policy Reform. 2022-2023 Editorial Assistant New Literary History of America. Eds. Greil Marcus and Werner Sollors, Cambridge: Harvard UP, Sept. 2009. Panel Organizer, \u201dThe Place of Music in Science Fiction and Fantasy Annual Convention. Philadelphia, PA, 29 Dec. 2006. Member of Executive Committee, 2003-2007; Chair, 2006; Secretary, 2005 Discussion Group on Science Fiction and Utopian and Fantastic Literature Dean\u2019s Research Enhancement Grant for \u201cScience-Fictional North Korea,\u201d Queens College, CUNY, 2014 Research Foundation Award (Tradition B),\u201d The Geomantic Significance of the Korean ,\u201d Funding for travel and research in Korea, 2011 Research Foundation Award, \u201cScience-Fictional North Korea,\u201d 2010. Graduate Society Fellowship for Dissertation Completion, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) , Harvard University, 2006-2007. Derek Bok Certificate of Distinction in Teaching, Harvard University, 2006. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 23/40 Merit Fellowship for Dissertation Research. GSAS, Harvard University, 2005-2006. Derek Bok Certificate of Distinction in Teaching. Harvard University, 2004. Fall Research Grant. Graduate Student Council, Harvard University, 2004. Derek Bok Certificate of Distinction in Teaching. Harvard University, 2003. Smith Memorial Prize for essay, \u201cThe Fourth Dimension of Marcel Duchamp\u2019s Large Glass,\u201d Stanford University, 2000. Herson Prize for outstanding work in the English major, Yale University, 1999. McLaughlin Scholarship for excellence in composition and the study of English literature, Yale University, 1998. Curtis Prize for literary or rhetorical work in the junior year, Yale University, 1998. Riggs Prize for distinguished work in the Directed Studies Program, Yale University, 1996 (under construction Conversation on Sexual Violence in Asian America\u201d (Center for the Study of Race, Politics, and Culture at the University of Chicago TV: Robot Coda\u201d (Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop) \u201cBeyond the Catastrophic Origins of the Korean DMZ\u201d / \u201cThe Human Rights of a No-Man\u2019s Land\u201d (Queens College, CUNY, and Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand) \u201cKorean American #MeToo\u201d (Korean American Story) \u201cHow #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser\u201d (New York Magazine) \u201cMy Professional World Has Gotten Smaller\u201d (Chronicle of Higher Education TRAUMA\u201d (Connecticut Office of the Arts) \u201cOn Audio Descriptions and Anti-Asian Violence\u201d (MLA) 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 24/40 \u201cSeo-Young discusses her struggles at Yale, stress culture, and gives some advice and perspective\u201d (Elis for Rachael) Seo-Young Chu on \u201cDo Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep?\u201d (TTBOOK) \u201cTransnational Dialogue on Science Fiction\u201d (Kaya Press) \u201cUtopias Misplaced: The Cost of Outsourcing Dystopian Poetics to North Korea\u201d (Yale University and Course (under construction) Courses Taught at Queens College (not including thesis projects and independent studies) \u0000 English 636: \u201cHistory of Literary Criticism\u201d (graduate course): spring 2013, spring 2014, fall 2016, spring 2019, spring 2020, spring 2021, spring 2022. \u0000 English 379 VT: Topics in Transnational Postcolonial Literature: The Korean and Its Others\u201d: fall 2013, fall 2015, spring 2017, fall 2021. \u0000 English 314 VT: \u201cStudies in Popular Genre\u201d: fall 2020, scheduled for fall 2022 \u0000 English 244: \u201cTheory\u201d: spring 2020, spring 2021, fall 2021, spring 2022, scheduled for fall 2022. \u0000 English 244: \u201cTheory\u201d: Sections 1 & 2: fall 2019 \u0000 English 243: \u201cGenre\u201d: Sections 1 & 2: spring 2017. \u0000 English 170W: \u201cIntroduction to Literary Study\u201d: fall 2016, fall 2020. \u0000 English 170H: \u201cIntroduction to Literary Study\u201d: fall 2016. \u0000 English 399W: \u201cHonors Seminar\u201d Sections 1 & 2: fall 2015, spring 2016 \u0000 English 336/305/300: \u201cForms of Fiction\u201d/\u201dStudies in Literature\u201d/\u201dSenior Seminar\u201d: spring 2015. \u0000 English 243: \u201cGenre\u201d: spring 2014, spring 2015. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 25/40 \u0000 English 382: \u201cAspects of Literary Criticism\u201d: spring 2013, fall 2014. \u0000 English 781: \u201cSpecial Seminar in Science Fiction.\u201d (graduate course): spring 2012, spring 2015, spring 2016. \u0000 English 255: \u201cGlobal Literatures in English\u201d: spring 2010, fall 2010, spring 2011, fall 2013. \u0000 English 369: \u201cAsian American Literature\u201d: spring 2011, spring 2019. \u0000 English 391W VT: \u201cSenior Seminar on Science Fiction\u201d: spring 2010, spring 2011, spring 2012, fall 2013, fall 2014, spring 2019, fall 2021. \u0000 English 395W: \u201cScience Fiction\u201d: fall 2009, fall 2010. \u0000 English 165W and/or English 165H: \u201cIntroduction to Poetry\u201d: fall 2009, fall 2010, spring 2012, spring 2013, fall 2014. \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013 \u201cThe Korean and Its Others\u201d Prof. Seo-Young Chu We explore the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) as an inaccessible dream-scape, a site of conflict, a postcolonial artifact, a tourist destination, an international border, a sanctuary for wildlife, a living injury to the land, a minefield, and a complicated figure of speech. In addition to maps, brochures, souvenirs, photographs, and historical accounts, texts on the syllabus will include \u201cDMZ-American\u201d poems by Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Don Mee Choi, Franny Choi, Cathy Park Hong, Suji Kwock Kim, and Mia You; Y0UNG INDUSTRIES\u02bcs digital narrative \u201cMiss DMZ\u201d; Yong Soon Min\u02bcs visual essay Defining Moments; the 2000 film J.S.A.; clips from the 2019-2020 series Crash Landing on You; and propaganda from both/all sides of the zone. Readings will be accompanied by insights from theorists such as Gloria E. Anzald\u00faa and Edward Said. Topics encompass translation, war, displacement, nostalgia, globalization, Orientalism, architecture, borderlands, nationhood, theme parks, the \u201caura\u201d of the DMZ, the future of the DMZ, the relationship of the to the Korean diaspora, and ways in which studying the Korean might illuminate similar situations elsewhere throughout the world. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 26/40 \u2013 To study the ways in which the has operated as a complicated figure of speech (e.g., as a metonym for North Korea; as a symbol of peaceful reunification; as a metaphor for the divided psyche of Korean Americans; etc\u2026). \u2013 To learn how to use (in one\u2019s own writing) and to identify and analyze (in others\u2019 writings) a range of rhetorical devices and figures (e.g., metaphor, simile, personification, anaphora). \u2013 To trace how and why the and representations of the have evolved over the decades. \u2013 To apply lessons learned from the Korean to similar situations elsewhere in the world. \u2013 To try to understand the ways in which colonialism, war, trauma, hope, and competing ideologies have resonated throughout the literal and figurative dimensions of the Korean DMZ. \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013 English 399W-1: \u201cBeauty, Its Opposite, and Their Others\u201d Prof. Seo-Young Chu What makes a work of literature beautiful? When you read a poem whose lyricism causes you to sigh, or when you luxuriate in the pleasure of narrative suspense while reading a detective novel of ingenious design, what exactly is happening between the words on the page and the neurons in your body? Does \u201cbeauty\u201d have an antonym\u2013and, if so, what is the name for beauty\u2019s opposite? Under what circumstances might one create an appealing representation of an appalling reality? Does art exist simply for its own sake, or is art importantly useful? Is it possible for a work of art to be both ugly and aesthetically valuable? What does it mean to judge a work of art? Can a standard of taste\u2013an agreement concerning that which is agreeable\u2013perform the work of a social contract? Is political action conceivable without aesthetic inspiration? How has our perception of aesthetics been transformed by factors like technology and globalization? Such questions will guide us (and occasionally elude us) in this two- semester Honors Seminar as we investigate a range of aesthetic 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 27/40 philosophies as well as a variety of texts (both natural and artificial) evocative of diverse aesthetic reactions. Objects of interpretation will encompass not only verbal artifacts (literary fiction, theory, verse, manifestos) but also visual images (e.g., photographs, paintings, sculptures\u2026the afterimages that shimmer before us when we shut our eyes). Other possible \u201ctexts\u201d include multisensory experiences such as watching a film, visiting a museum, solving a puzzle, consuming a meal, having a dream, encountering a fragrant garden, describing a texture, purchasing a commodity, wandering through a cityscape, viewing/listening to a music video, guessing how a narrative will conclude, and creating an original work of art. In the spring half of the yearlong Honors Seminar, we will continue to develop our ideas and arguments about beauty, its opposite, and their others. You will revise the paper that you wrote in the fall semester into an Honors Essay. In addition, you will adapt your Honors Essay into a presentation that you will deliver at an Honors Conference to be organized by you and your colleagues. Class time will be devoted to workshopping essays and conference papers, studying for the Honors Exam, and engaging in the same dialogues \u2014 the same topics and questions \u2014 that engross our attention right now. For example: How might neuroscience elucidate literary aesthetics? In what ways have globalization and technology affected our senses and sensibilities? Does beauty have an antonym, and if so: what is it? Has the uncanny valley changed over time? To what extent is it possible for sculpture to achieve the effect of music, or for prose to achieve the effect of emoji? Can a standard of taste (an agreement concerning that which is \u201cagreeable\u201d) perform the work of a social contract (i.e. a social \u201cagreement\u201d)? In our encounters with appealingly rendered portraits of appalling realities, did you find yourselves unsettled by the dissonance between form (e.g., Swift\u2019s well-wrought rhyming couplets) and content? In what ways does an aesthetic experience differ from an aesthetic object? Is political action conceivable without lyric inspiration? Is the category of the sublime capable of illuminating psychological trauma? What does it mean to defend poetry, to defend art, to defend the humanities? Finally, what have you learned from studying aesthetics, and what shape might be taken by the afterlife of this seminar? \u2014\u2014 Courses Taught at Harvard University \u0000 \u201cAmerican Visions and Voices,\u201d History and Literature, 2008-2009. \u0000 \u201cAmerican Characters,\u201d History and Literature, 2007-2008. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 28/40 \u0000 \u201cTransnational Modernism,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, fall 2007. \u0000 \u201cScience Fiction,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2006. \u0000 \u201cLesbian Gothic,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2005. \u0000 \u201cThe Asian American Literary Canon,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, fall 2004. \u0000 \u201cAsian American Literature,\u201d English and American Literature and Language, spring 2004. Undergraduate Theses Supervised at Harvard University \u0000 \u201cThe Hero We Create: 9/11 and the Reinvention of Batman,\u201d Joshua Feblowitz, History and Literature, 2008-2009. \u0000 \u201cClassical Music and Film: An Analysis of How 2001 Space Odyssey Popularized Also Sprach Zarathustra in American Society,\u201d Kyle Wiggins, History and Literature, 2008-2009. \u0000 \u201cRobert Johnson and His Journey through Modern Prose and Poetry,\u201d Aubrie Pagano, History and Literature, 2007-2008. \u0000 \u201cGiving Back the Name: Sanora Babb\u2019s Insight into Feminism and Environmentalism,\u201d Rikka Strong, History and Literature, 2007-2008. Sections Taught at Harvard University \u0000 \u201cLiterature of Migration and Ethnicity: The Case of the United States,\u201d Professor Werner Sollors, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2006. \u0000 \u201cThe Nineteenth-Century Novel,\u201d Professor Elaine Scarry, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2005. \u0000 \u201cPutting Modernism Together,\u201d Professor Daniel Albright, Core Curriculum, fall 2004. \u0000 \u201cModern British Fiction,\u201d Professor Peter Nohrnberg, English and American Literature and Language, spring 2004. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 29/40 \u0000 \u201cThe Elements of Rhetoric,\u201d Professor James Engell, English and American Literature and Language, fall 2003. \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013 Sections Taught at Stanford University \u201cAmerican Literature and Culture to 1855,\u201d Professor Jay Fliegelman (who sexually harassed and raped me while was his advisee, teaching assistant, and teaching observee), winter 2000 had just turned 22 years old was naive and inexperienced was a first-year graduate student, new to the profession, new to teaching, new to California, new to Stanford. He was tenured. He was powerful. He was in his 50s. He had been a Stanford institution for decades. This is disjointed because I\u2019m re- living it all over again. Shortly after he violated me was hospitalized. Shortly after was discharged from the hospital gave a guest lecture on Seneca Falls and women\u2019s rights. His response was to tell me forgot to mention women\u2019s right to sexual pleasure. There are gaps here because trauma is nonlinear, trauma broke my sense of time. At some point Stanford conducted an investigation. As a result of the investigation, which was a brutal experience, Stanford punished my abuser by suspending him for two years without pay. Some of his colleagues had the audacity to blame me for the whole situation. I\u2019m angry. I\u2019m experimenting with incorporating my anger into this CV. The truth is that my career started with rape. My career is a product of rape. My career has been shaped by rape. My sense of who am as an academic: shaped by rape. The gaps in my are trauma-generated plot holes that lead to Northern California in the year 2000 (under construction The New Yorker: the-memory-police-makes-you-see Cover Interview by ROROTOKO. \u201d The Double Lives of Metaphors, Robots, and Other Science-Fictional/Lyric Figures .\u201d Cutting-Edge Intellectual Interview, edited by Erind Pajo. Web. 20 Jun. 2011. 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 30/40 Radio Interview with Jim Fleming. \u201cSeo-Young Chu on Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep?\u201d Program Title: The Language of Science Fiction . To the Best of Our Knowledge ). Distributed by Public Radio International, Web. 25 Sept. 2011 *note to self: other links here Broadway World Daily Queens Daily Eagle Many thanks for your email\u2013and for the excellent work you\u2019ve been doing. Yes would like to help. Here are some links you might find relevant (in roughly chronological order Refuge for Jae-in Doe: Fugues in the Key of English Major\u201d. Author(s):: Seo-Young Chu (November 3, 2017). english-major/ \u201cGhost From the Past: Professor\u2019s essay about being harassed and raped by her late adviser sparks calls for public acknowledgment of the reasons for his past suspension from Stanford and the renaming of a disciplinary society mentorship award that bore his name.\u201d By Colleen Flaherty (November 9, 2017). 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 31/40 raped-professor-sparks-call-public-acknowledgment-stanford-and \u201c2 Women Say Stanford Professors Raped Them Years Ago.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 11, 2017). raped-them-years-ago/ \u201cEnglish faculty told to redirect press questions on sexual assault allegations to University communications.\u201d By Brian Contreras (Nov. 13, 2017, 1:00 a.m.). press-questions-on-sexual-assault-allegations-to-university- communications \u201cSexual Harassment and Assault in Higher Ed: What\u2019s Happened Since Weinstein.\u201d By Nell Gluckman , Brock Read, Bianca Quilantan, and Katherine Mangan 13, 2017). higher-ed-whats-happened-since-weinstein/ \u201cEditorial Board: Let\u2019s hold faculty to a higher standard on sexual assault.\u201d Opinion by Vol. 252 Editorial Board (Nov. 14, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). to-a-higher-standard-on-sexual-assault/ \u201cHere\u2019s What Sexual Harassment Looks Like in Higher Education.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 16, 2017). like-in-higher-education/ \u201cOpen Letter from Alumni to Stanford: Not in Our Name.\u201d by 22, 2017). in-our-name Professor Is Kind of Like a Priest\u2019: Two recent cases reveal how the structure of American graduate schools enables sexual harassment and worse.\u201d By Irene Hsu and Rachel Stone (Nov. 30, 2017). 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 32/40 \u201cStanford: Sexual misconduct revelation exposes storied professor\u2019s secret.\u201d (Dec. 1, 2017). revelation-exposes-storied-professors-secret/ \u201cBehind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation.\u201d By Fangzhou Liu (Dec. 2, 2017, 3:37 p.m.). misconduct-investigation/ \u201cFormer students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 3, 2017). \u201cAn open letter to Stanford on sexual harassment in academia.\u201d Opinion by Gloria Fisk and From the Community (Dec. 5, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). sexual-harassment-in-academia/ NOTE: Professor Alex Woloch has yet to respond. \u201cWhat Happens When Sex Harassment Disrupts Victims\u2019 Academic Careers.\u201d By Nell Gluckman 6, 2017). disrupts-victims-academic-careers/ \u201cFormer Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us.\u201d By Vanessa Ranca\u00f1o (Dec 7, 2017). voice-to-speak-out-against-sexual-misconduct-by-professors \u201c\u2018Fairly Normal and Routine\u2019: 50 Years of Sexual Violence at Stanford.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 31, 2018). 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 33/40 \u201cProvost, General Counsel offer personal contributions to anti-sexual assault organization after Stanford denies Fliegelman victim\u2019s request for donation.\u201d By Alex Tsai (Feb. 26, 2018, 12:20 a.m.). personal-contributions-to-anti-sexual-assault-organization-after- stanford-denies-fliegelman-victims-request-for-donation/ \u201cAfter Refuge for Jae-in Doe Social Media Chronology.\u201d By Seo-Young Chu (March 15, 2018). chronology/ \u201cAcademia\u2019s #MeToo moment: \u2018I\u2019m really struck by how endemic this is\u2019: \u2018There isn\u2019t a day in my life when haven\u2019t been eaten away by it in some way.'\u201d By Nick Anderson (May 10, 2018). moment-women-accuse-professors-of-sexual- misconduct/2018/05/10/474102de-2631-11e8-874b- d517e912f125_story.html \u201c\u2018My Professional World Has Gotten Smaller\u2019: How sexual harassment and assault distort scholars\u2019 lives in the academy.\u201d By Julia Schmalz 11, 2018). smaller/ \u201cStanford One Year After #MeToo: How Stanford\u2019s Response Failed Victims of Sexual Assault.\u201d By 14, 2019). how-stanfords-response-failed-victims-of-sexual-assault/ \u201cHow #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser \u2014 Testimonies New York Magazine\u201d (Sep 29, 2019). v=2tVhymU3DcM&list=PLXQRPSEGHTBiFsePIdraK3KNHvXQ1iFaM&index=7 \u201cWas It Worth It?\u201d By Irin Carmon and Amelia Schonbek Additional reporting by Sarah Jones (Sept. 30, 2019). 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 34/40 and-what-comes-after.html \u201cTitle at Stanford timeline of recent events.\u201d By Emma Talley, Kate Selig, Sarina Deb, Daniel Wu, Ujwal Srivastava, Lauryn Johnson, Anastasiia Malenko and Danielle Echeverria (June 9, 2020, 11:35 p.m.). recent-events/ \u201cStanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct.\u201d By Cameron Ehsan, Victoria Hsieh and Kathryn Zheng (July 9, 2021, 5:10 p.m.). collection-brick/ Seo-Young Chu on sexual violence at Stanford and Korean American # MeToo (March 3, 2022). TWITTER: s=20&t=hLixVyJTBj8GK5MLpn9HCg s=20&t=MXDLmJm83X9aeKs-fZolig Many thanks. Best, Seo-Young Many thanks. Best, 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 35/40 Seo-Young Refuge for Jae-in Doe\u201d has been cited/discussed in/on/by (in alphabetical order\u2014some are brief citations, others are lengthy discussions, and I\u2019m still trying to figure out what counts as \u201cpress/media\u201d) ABO: Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts, 1640-1830, Fall 2020 American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS) The and the changed the name of mentorship awards. \u201c\u2026 On behalf of our Society, we accept this charge, and we thank Professor Chu and our colleagues for their eloquence and passion in urging us forward Board statement-on-harassment-and-abuse/amp/, 10 Nov. 2017 12 Nov. 2017 uK5Cbyuq1lAGvYgUiEKy_DTAZg/edit, 10 Nov. 2017 (article by Robert Warrior), 2020 Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop 10 Nov. 2017 07- 12/event/519013, 12 Jul. 2021 Chicago Review, 28 Jan 2022 The Chronicle of Higher Education higher-ed-whats-happened-since-weinstein/, 13 Nov. 2017 disrupts-victims-academic-careers/, 6 Dec. 2017 11 Nov. 2017 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 36/40 11 May 2018 Committee on Gender Equality and Diversity at the University of Hong Kong Cornell University \u201cProceedings of the Consensual Relationship Policy Committee,\u201d 1 May 2018 The Daily Beast, 1 Mar. 2018 Early American Literature: Hutchins, Zach. \u201cThe \u2018Raping Numbers\u2019 of Bradstreet\u2019s Admirers.\u201d Early American Literature. Vol. 55, No. 3 (2020), pp. 623-650. Stable URL: \u201cThe dehumanizing effect of their Petrarchan verse, which objectifies women and converts them into silent, absent, unknowable figures, was recently described to early Americanist readers by Seo- Young Chu, who recounts her rape at the hands of an academic adviser in the moving work of creative nonfiction Refuge for Jae- In Doe: Fugues in the Key of English Major.\u201d7 Chu insists that \u201cthe sonnet was a site of sexual violence. Male poets were rewarded for celebrating the women they hunted.\u201d And in lines that echo Bradstreet\u2019s own characterization of herself as a female deer, Chu writes of herself in the terms of Petrarchan metaphor: Doe: a deer, a female deer\u2014 Often chased by sonneteers of old. Caught, and killed, and bathed in fear, Turned to human blazons to be sold\u2014 (Chu) Like Chu, Bradstreet understood Petrarchan verse as a form of linguistic violence, and her experiments with the sonnet challenge its conventions to legitimize the desires, bodily presence, and subjectivity of women.8 In their formal innovations on the sonnet tradition, Chu and Bradstreet found a means of contesting poetic power structures authorizing the harassment and dehumanization of women.\u201d Frances Kai-Hwa Wang: Resources, 17 May 2022 Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Improving Campus Climate, University of Minnesota, 14 Dec. 2017 Inside Higher Ed. 9 Mpv/ 2017, 9 Nov. 2017 Journal of Asian American Studies 12 Jul 2021 KQED, 7 Dec. 2017 \u201c\u2026 Fliegelman was suspended for two years, \u2026. Then he went back to teaching at Stanford. He was later honored multiple times \u2014 at \u2026 \u201cJayfest\u201d \u2026 when the university acquired his rare book collection, \u2026 The 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 37/40 university also named an award in his honor, \u2026 In 2016, the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies also named a mentorship award after Fliegelman. The society renamed it after hearing from Chu\u2026\u201d The Literary Hub, 18 Apr. 2022. \u201cThe Impossible, Crucial Task of Teaching About Rape as a Survivor\u201d by Emily Van Duyne. \u201cChu turned to the sonnet to describe her experience of being first stalked, then transformed from a human woman into an object. Like others before her\u2014Anne Boleyn, Shakespeare\u2019s \u201cDark Lady\u201d\u2014she transforms, in the course of the sonnet, from a human into a literary device, a blazon: a body stripped of its parts, to be cataloged as a series of rare and beautiful objects\u201d Longreads The Margins (AAWW) The Mercury News, 1 Dec. 2017 \u201c\u2026 But this month, after an explosive series of revelations in an online publication and on Facebook, his legacy \u2014 and an elite university\u2019s role in promoting it \u2014 has been tumbled upside down, exposing a dark underside of how powerful faculty at private institutions can escape public scorn\u2026\u201c Ms. Magazine, 16 Mar. 2018 Neon Books, 3 Sep. 2018 \u201c\u2026 One of the paradoxes of trauma is that it usually begins after a person is out of immediate danger. Like an echo, harm may take time to reach us.\u201c New Chaucer Studies: Pedagogy and Profession, Autumn 2021 New York Magazine and- what-comes-after.html, 30 Sep.2019 Video (separate from the article), 30 Sep. 2019 The New Republic, 30 Nov. 2017 PopMatters, 7 Jan. 2019 review of The America\u2019s Best Nonrequired Reading. \u201c\u2026 It\u2019s incredibly hard to take but impossible to ignore and in keeping with the inconsistencies of the series title, this entry is definitely required reading.\u201d Rape Culture and Female Resistance in Late Medieval Literature 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 38/40 Society of Early Americanists, 10 Nov. 2017 Stanford Asian Pacific American Alumni Club (SAPAAC) Board, 22 Nov. 2017 The Stanford Daily misconduct-investigation/, 2 Dec. 2017 sexual harassment-in-academia/, 5 Dec. 2017 blaming-stanford-revises-sexual-harassment-guidelines-webpage-but- criticism-persists/, 18 May 2017 personal-contributions-to-anti-sexual-assault-organization-after- stanford-denies-fliegelman-victims-request-for-donation/, 26 Feb. 2017 gains-over-1000-signatures/, 9 Oct. 2018 collection-brick/, 9 Jul. 2019 \u201c\u2026Stanford on Tuesday moved to strip the name of deceased English professor Jay Fliegelman Ph.D. \u201977, who was accused of sexual assault, from his namesake library collection. The renaming was prompted by four years of advocacy from alumni and law professor Michele Dauber\u2026 Former graduate student Seo-Young Chu M.A. \u201901 said she was sexually harassed and assaulted by Fliegelman, her dissertation advisor, while studying at Stanford\u2026.\u201c Stanford Politics, 3 Dec. 2017 how-stanfords-response-failed-victims-of-sexual-assault/ in-our-name/ \u201cthe resulting sanction was even said to be the university\u2019s most serious punishment to date, though it wasn\u2019t made public at the time. Stanford 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 39/40 People Groups Sites Courses Events Activity About Help Privacy Terms of Service Accessibility Creative Commons (CC) license unless otherwise noted Built with WordPress Protected by Akismet Powered by suspended English professor Jay Fliegelman and banned him from the department for two years, but few other than the faculty and students who were close to him seemed to know or care why. His graduate student advisee, Seo-Young Chu, had formally accused him of rape. The matter was handled quietly, and the university ultimately behaved as if the rape had never happened, allowing Fliegelman to continue to meet with students during his suspension. After he died in 2007, a glowing memorial resolution was published the next year which described a triumphant career and offered no mention of his censure, let alone the accusation against him. Chu\u2019s memory wasn\u2019t quite so short. In 2017, she published a widely-discussed creative nonfiction piece on the blog Entropy relating her experiences and finally making Fliegelman\u2019s behavior public knowledge. At her request, Stanford also finally published a summary of their 2000 investigation. But for 17 years, that story went untold. The secrecy with which the Fliegelman case was handled raises the question of how many more sexual assault allegations have been adjudicated behind closed doors. How those proceedings operate has been an ongoing source of controversy at Stanford.\u201d Tulsa Studies in Women\u2019s Literature, Spring 2018 Still gathering links/info Washington University Law Review (Vol. 96, Issue 5), 2019 2/22/25, 10:24 Seo-Young Chu (\uc8fc\uc11c\uc601 Academic Commons 40/40", "7582_104.pdf": "Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us By Vanessa Ranca\u00f1o Dec 7, 2017 Save Article Donate 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 1/21 Seo-Young Chu\u2019s 1999 Stanford ID. (Courtesy Seo-Young Chu) 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 2/21 It's not just Hollywood, politics and media where allegations of sexual misconduct are pouring in. Women in academia are sharing in the #MeToo moment, opening up about the high-ranking professors they say abused their trust and violated their bodies when they were graduate students. The women describe experiences of being stalked, forcibly kissed and raped by men who were entrusted with shepherding them through their studies. Advocates fighting to prevent sexual violence and harassment on college campuses say cases allegedly involving professors who taught at Stanford University and Berkeley point to a culture in graduate schools where powerful professors are protected and allowed to act with near impunity at the expense of the students who depend on them for advice, guidance and the recommendations they needed to advance their education and careers. An Election Stirs Uncomfortable Memories Last fall, as Seo-Young Chu watched Donald Trump ascend to the highest office in the country, she felt an eerie sense of familiarity. Maybe it was the crude language he used to describe women on the \"Access Hollywood\" videotape, or the women who came forward during the campaign alleging he'd sexually harassed them, but Chu felt she recognized those mannerisms of his, and they jogged ugly memories. \"For a moment remember watching and thinking 'How could they elect Jay Fliegelman?'\" Sponsored Jay Fliegelman had been Chu's dissertation adviser at Stanford 17 years ago. Chu was a 21-year-old graduate student in the English Department who'd tried to commit suicide not long before and had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Fliegelman was a leading scholar and American Literature professor. He died in 2007. Chu alleges Fliegelman harassed her, touched her and ultimately raped her. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 3/21 Seo-Young Chu's 1999 Stanford ID. (Courtesy Seo-Young Chu) \u201cIt started with strange remarks,\u201d Chu says. Then, she says, Fliegelman invited her to his house to see his famous collection of rare books. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 4/21 \"We were in his living room,\" Chu says remember him telling me that his current project was about his books, and that reading his books meant feeling them and touching them and being emotional with them, possessive even, and that\u2019s when he started touching me couldn\u2019t move was petrified.\u201d The next day in class, she says, she didn\u2019t know how to interact with him. Then, she says, he invited her back to his house. \u201cThis was the man who would be writing letters of recommendation for me and, in his words, controlling my future.\u201d She worried that if she declined his invitation, she\u2019d be shunned. \u201cHe was so powerful,\u201d she says. \u201cHe was this man who could get you jobs in a market where it\u2019s difficult to get jobs.\u201d So she went back thought, well, I\u2019ll go to his house, but if he starts doing something won\u2019t let it happen. But he did something.\u201d Chu alleges Fliegelman raped her that night. She didn't report the assault didn't know what to do,\" she says felt powerless.\" She says the harassment went on and, finally, she told him she was gay. It wasn\u2019t exactly true, but it was the only way she could see to navigate what she calls his \"fragile ego\" and power over her future. It was a forced coming out, one she still resents. Chu says she is bisexual but didn\u2019t get a chance to fully explore her sexuality as a young person. She says she\u2019d been a virgin before the assault. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 5/21 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 6/21 used to think my guest lecture for JF\u2019s course (winter 2000) was a dream,' Chu posted on Instagram. (Courtesy Seo-Young Chu) Eventually, Chu says, she fell apart. Seeing her pain, a friend started making calls on her behalf. Exactly what happened next is hazy for Chu. But former Stanford English professor Herbert Lindenberger said in an email he reported the misconduct to the chair of the English Department and a graduate student reported it to the dean's office. In a supportive note on Chu\u2019s Facebook page responding to a post about her experience, Lindenberger described how the campus community reacted when he spoke out: \u201cBecause played a key role in instigating Fliegelman's punishment,\" he wrote, \"a number of my friends -- colleagues and students whom he mentored -- have held my role against me.\" In an open letter last month on Facebook, Chu claims that others enabled Fliegelman's conduct. Stanford Investigation Concludes There Was Harassment When the allegations first surfaced, Stanford University hired an outside lawyer to investigate. Stanford said it could not share the findings of that investigation due to privacy laws. But just recently Chu herself managed to get a summary of the findings after repeatedly pressing the university. The two-page letter from Stanford's general counsel summarized the 2000 investigation. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 7/21 It said the investigation found Fliegelman had called Chu repeatedly and left her messages with sexual content, showed her pornography and initiated oral sex. \"You stated that the sexual contact was preceded by your stating that you were uncomfortable and wanted to leave,\" the letter reads. The summary says Fliegelman disputed that, but the letter continues, \"Although there were no other witnesses to this incident, the investigation found that you made contemporaneous reports to others that were consistent with your assertion that the contact was nonconsensual.\" Based on the findings, the provost at the time, John Etchemendy, concluded that Fliegelman \"engaged in a pattern of unwelcome verbal conduct of a sexual nature, and engaged in an incident of physical sexual contact under circumstances that were extremely inappropriate and in which your assent could be questioned.\" Fliegelman was suspended for two years, barred from the department during that time and sent to mandatory counseling. Then he went back to teaching at Stanford. He was later honored multiple times -- at a one-day conference at Stanford known as \"Jayfest\" put on by former grad students, when the university acquired his rare book collection, and when he died. 'This to me encapsulates the problem. The provost of Stanford University participated in a ceremony that praised an individual who had literally been banned from campus.' \u2014Michele Dauber, Stanford Law School The university also named an award in his honor, a practice the university followed for other faculty but which it has since discontinued. In 2016, the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies also named a mentorship award after Fliegelman. The society renamed it after hearing from Chu. Fliegelman was honored even though his sexual misconduct case was well-known on campus. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 8/21 When he died in 2007, following standard practice at Stanford, a colleague read a memorial resolution honoring him in the Faculty Senate. The resolution described Fliegelman as a dedicated teacher and mentor. \"On three occasions he won awards for teaching, including the Dean's Award for Outstanding Teaching and the Associated Students of Stanford University Teaching Award,\" it said. \"These honors do not begin to tell the story of his remarkable devotion to classroom instruction and to advising and reading dissertations.\" Everyone there -- including Provost Etchemendy, who disciplined Fliegelman -- stood in tribute. \u201cThis to me encapsulates the problem,\" says Michele Dauber, a professor at Stanford Law School and a vocal advocate for victims of sexual assault on campus. \"The provost of Stanford University participated in a ceremony that praised an individual who had literally been banned from campus.\u201d But for Dauber it\u2019s not a surprise. \u201cThis is what has been my experience at Stanford: light consequences followed by a sense that this kind of conduct just isn\u2019t bad enough to remove someone from this community. And that is the sense that really must change if we\u2019re going to make any progress.\" She says sexual misconduct occurs on many college campuses, but she argues an acute lack of transparency at private universities like Stanford contributes to a lack of accountability. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 9/21 Stanford Law School professor Michele Dauber has been an advocate for victims of sexual assault on campus for the last decade. (Courtesy Michele Dauber) Private schools aren't subject to public records laws, though they're heavily subsidized by taxpayers 2015 report found Stanford receives $63,100 in tax subsidies per student, while Berkeley -- which is subject to public records laws -- receives $10,500 per student. \u201cThey are literally awash in government money and yet they are not subject to the same kinds of transparency that we impose on public schools,\" Dauber says. \"It is contrary to the public interest to spend so much public money on a black box, particularly where sexual harassment and assault by faculty are concerned.\u201d Dauber has publicly called for the university to disavow the memorial resolution, and says she's putting together a formal request to the Faculty Senate in conjunction with other faculty. Regarding Chu's case, Stanford University says the Title office is \"reviewing the allegations to see if there is an action for the university to take.\" 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 10/21 Over the years, Stanford has tried to make it easier for students to report sexual misconduct. The school has created confidential resources to provide support to students and strengthened policies governing relationships between faculty and students. 'Emily Doe's' Letter to Brock Turner Inspired Chu to Speak Out Chu is now an associate professor in the English Department at Queens College CUNY. She started writing about her experience at Stanford on Facebook last summer, after she read Emily Doe\u2019s letter to Brock Turner, the Stanford student convicted for sexually assaulting Doe while she was unconscious. She recently published an essay in Entropy magazine that has brought her considerable attention. Stanford did offer Chu an apology. In that Nov. 27 letter summarizing the investigation, the general counsel, Debra Zumwalt, wrote: On behalf of Stanford University, let me express how sorry am that you have suffered as a result of a faculty member's misconduct. You did the right thing by bringing this issue forward back in 2000, and we are grateful to you for doing so. It's the first apology Chu recalls getting from the university, but instead of bringing her closure, the letter raises more questions for her. She remembers being raped all too clearly, she says, and doesn't understand why the school found Fliegelman responsible only for harassment. \"At this point what really want is an explanation,\" Chu says want to move on, but first need to understand what happened to me.\" Chu requested a copy of the investigative report on her case from Stanford, but hasn't received it yet Berkeley Grad Student Shares Familiar Story of Abuse couple of days after Chu\u2019s essay came out, another woman made public her own decades-old allegations against a professor. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 11/21 Kimberly Latta was in her first semester of grad school at Berkeley in the mid-'80s when she took a class from a visiting professor: Franco Moretti. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 12/21 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 13/21 Kimberly Latta during her first few weeks at Berkeley in 1985. (Courtesy Kimberly Latta) In a Nov. 5 letter posted on Facebook, Latta writes that Moretti \u201csexually stalked,\" \"pressured\" and \"raped\u201d her remember wanting him to stop and telling him don\u2019t like this, I'm not comfortable with this,\" she says in an interview. To which she remembers him responding, \u201c\u2018You American women, when you say no you mean yes.\u2019\u201d Moretti is Italian. She says the harassment continued for several months. During his office hours in the English Department, she remembers Moretti pushing her up against the wall and grabbing her breasts remember feeling kind of revolted and paralyzed and embarrassed and ashamed and deeply uncomfortable,\u201d she says, \u201cand yet totally and completely passive and unable to do anything. For the longest time remember feeling so ashamed of myself for having allowed that to happen, as though it were somehow my fault.\u201d Eventually, Latta says, she became sick with anxiety. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 14/21 She stopped going to Moretti\u2019s class because she\u2019d get sick to her stomach when she did. She went to Berkeley\u2019s Title office to make a complaint remember walking in and thinking, \u2018Oh shit.\u2019\" The officer at the time was Frances Ferguson, another professor in the English department. Latta remembers crying in Ferguson\u2019s office and telling her she was being harassed. She doesn\u2019t remember if she told Ferguson she\u2019d been raped was deeply ashamed of that,\" Latta says. Latta says Ferguson actively discouraged her from reporting. \"Her demeanor and coldness led me to believe that if were to go through with a formal process, there would be nobody at the university who would be on my side, who would believe me.\u201d She assumed it was because Ferguson and Moretti knew each other, and \u201cthey were on the same team and wasn\u2019t was an expendable graduate student.\u201d Both professors deny they were friends at the time. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 15/21 Kimberly Latta in Berkeley. (Courtesy Kimberly Latta) In a statement, Ferguson said she hadn\u2019t understood the misconduct to be so significant. She recalled Latta describing sexual harassment, not assault. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 16/21 respect that we remember some of these events differently,\" she said in the statement. \"Had any student at Berkeley brought a formal complaint concerning such allegations would have pursued it.\" But that wasn\u2019t Latta\u2019s impression. So instead of going through with the formal process, Latta says, she told Moretti she\u2019d reported him to the university. She says he threatened to destroy her reputation and end her career. Moretti is now a professor emeritus at Stanford. He did not respond to a request for comment, but he told the Stanford Daily he denies the rape allegation. He said Latta had been a consensual partner. \u201cWe went out to dinner together one night and back to her apartment, where we had fully consensual sex and spent the night,\u201d Moretti told the campus paper did not rape her, and am horrified by the accusation.\u201d He added that he and Latta kept meeting, and maintained their acquaintance until he left Berkeley. He also denied threatening Latta friend of Latta\u2019s, who was a fellow student in Moretti\u2019s class, confirmed much of Latta\u2019s account. She asked not to be named because she\u2019s still in academia. She remembers Latta agreeing to go on a date with Moretti and having a bad experience, though she didn\u2019t know the details. Afterward, she says, the professor wouldn\u2019t stop pursuing Latta. \u201cBasically we would call it stalking,\u201d she said. \u201cShe would leave his office and be very upset.\u201d The friend remembers Latta trying to make a complaint and later telling her that she\u2019d been threatened with legal recrimination. The friend says Latta was a strong student, but ended up dropping out because of the episode. Latta says that\u2019s true. She didn\u2019t finish her Ph.D. at Berkeley had to leave academia for a long time because of what happened,\u201d she says. It wasn\u2019t just the trauma of the alleged assault and harassment, or the way the university responded that affected her. She says the experience with Moretti undermined her sense of herself. 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 17/21 Kimberly Latta with family on her 25th birthday. (Courtesy Kimberly Latta) \"At first thought he was interested in me because he thought had an interesting mind,\u201d she says. \u201cBut then to find out it was only sex -- it really sapped me of my sense of myself as an intellectual. It took me a long time to gather myself together and feel like a competent scholar after that.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 18/21 Latta says she has wanted to tell this story for years, but it\u2019s only because she feels buoyed by the recent wave of women's public testimonies that she\u2019s doing it now don\u2019t any longer feel like a single voice crying in the wilderness,\u201d she says. Stanford University says it is reviewing her allegations against Moretti. In the days after Latta spoke out, another allegation involving Moretti has surfaced from Jane Penner, a woman who alleges he harassed her while she was attending a seminar at Dartmouth University. Seeing women like Chu, Latta and Penner come forward as part of the #MeToo movement is heartening, says Stanford student Stephanie Pham, who founded the university\u2019s Association of Students for Sexual Assault Prevention. But, she says, it's also upsetting. \"What I\u2019ve found most disappointing and scary is that if you compare what happened to these survivors decades -- generations -- ago, to what\u2019s happening now, you see that nothing has really changed,\u201d Pham says. In 2015, about 40 percent of undergrad women who were surveyed said they had experienced sexual violence in some form at Stanford. Pham says, \u201cHistory continues to repeat itself.\u201d California News Fears for the Feds: San Diego Prosecutors Who Aided J6 Cases Face Trump Trouble His daughter has an ultra-rare genetic disorder. His push to treat it just hit a major milestone National Marine Sanctuary is almost here 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 19/21 Stay in touch. Sign up for our daily newsletter. To learn more about how we use your information, please read our privacy policy Radio Podcasts Events Newsletters Mobile Apps For Educators News Science Arts & Culture Technology Labor Crossword Donate Help Center About Staff Report Careers Accessibility Corporate Sponsorship Email Address: Sign Up 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 20/21 For TV/Film Producers Financial and Files Contact Us Copyright \u00a9 2025 Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service Privacy Policy 2/22/25, 10:24 Former Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us 21/21", "7582_105.pdf": "\uf107 \uf002 Jay Fliegelman As more reports of former professor of English Jay Fliegelman\u2019s sexual misconduct have recently been published, in just the last few days, two women have posted separately on social media their experiences as students of his. The series of tweets reveal that Fliegelman\u2019s behavior \u2014 at least of engaging in inappropriate relationships with and unwanted harassment of his graduate students \u2014 began as early as the late 1980s. One post also suggests that Fliegelman was involved with an undergraduate student who attempted suicide. Fliegelman, who is now deceased, was formally accused in 2000 of sexually harrassing and assaulting his graduate student Seo-Young Chu, who recently wrote a creative non- fiction piece on her experience for Entropy. He was subsequently suspended for two years, died in 2007, and was the subject of a now-controversial memorial resolution passed by Stanford\u2019s Faculty Senate in 2008. Fliegelman\u2019s 2007 obituary in Stanford Report includes much fawning praise from his colleagues like, \u201cIt was evident that he was not just one of the most important scholars of his generation, but one of the great teachers of our time,\u201d and it notes that \u201cFliegelman expressed his own love for teaching even Stanford\u2019s youngest students,\u201d omitting any mention of Fliegelman\u2019s suspension for sexual harassment NEWSLETTER! Join our mailing list MEDIA! Like on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Instagram WORK! Donate by RUAIR\u00cd on 3, 2017 \uf0e6 0 Former students of Jay Fliegelman describe Former students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s misconduct in 1980s, 1990s WikiCommons WikiCommons \uf09a \uf099 \uf0e0 2/22/25, 10:24 Former students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s - Stanford Politics 1/3 former student of Fliegelman\u2019s, Lydia Alix Fillingham (Ph \u201989 \u201996) posted on Twitter on Thursday afternoon with regards to the recent publicity of Fliegelman\u2019s sexual misconduct: This hits home particularly in terms of my own knowledge and perhaps complicity. Jay Fliegelman was one of my professors when got my PhD at Stanford in the 80\u2019s. During that time he was involved in consensual but not happy relationships with one grad student, and then another. He told me personally that he had been involved with an undergrad who attempted suicide remember telling him that that\u2019s one reason for not getting involved with undergrads, that the ones who respond may be the most vulnerable. But don\u2019t think contemplated any action was over at his house once and remember him putting his hand on my knee, and my sitting very still until he moved it off remember telling that would be very angry if he hurt one grad student friend he was involved with. No one responded well to that. Grad students are very close to professors often, but the power dynamic is never absent, even as friendship is present. Looking now think should have done something knew all this wasn\u2019t right. But in the context of the time? What could have done mean know should have done more. When reached out to for more information, Fillingham told Stanford Politics that \u201cJay\u2019s relationship with the undergrad was prior to when knew him, and think he said he was dating her, but she was unstable so he stopped.\u201d She also expressed that the culture was very different and policies were just beginning to place stricter boundaries on relationships between faculty and students. \u201cThings were very different then,\u201d she said. \u201cThere was no rule about profs not having relationships with grad students. Having sex with an undergrad that you taught was clearly prohibited and we were at the moment when all sex between profs and undergrads was recognized as bad, against the rules\u2026There was no rule about profs and grad students, except not your advisee, not someone you were grading.\u201d As to her own interaction with Fliegelman, Fillingham says, \u201cMy personal experience with Jay, where he put his hand on my leg, felt uncomfortable but nothing more.\u201d She emphasized that that the culture at the time made it rare for anyone to condemn, and especially difficult for women to report, sexual behavior that was improper due to power dynamics. Margaret Stohl \u201992), a best-selling author and another former student of Fliegelman\u2019s, also posted on Twitter Friday night: a rape victim of my @stanford english phd advisor Jay Fliegelman just came out. We knew what Jay was like. We went to his office in 2s w/ doors open. We knew he borrowed cash from boys & hit on girls. We saw this as our problem bc he was powerful, genius never thought of complaining. That was in 1990. Today read that he raped one of us, 11 years later. 11 years after did & said nothing. He is responsible for his actions am responsible for thinking was not worth my own safety, or hers got engaged & moved to Yale the next year. Was that why escaped? How did Jay Fliegelman become my advisor? Did he pick me? God, did he accept me bc of how looked, Stanford Politics is a non-profit, student-run publication. We rely on reader donations to continue providing quality journalism to the Stanford community and beyond. \uf09a \uf099 \uf0e0 2/22/25, 10:24 Former students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s - Stanford Politics 2/3 About / Contact \u00b7 Archive \u00a9 2017 Stanford Political Journal The Tax Overhaul National Disgrace \uf054 Coaxing the Giant: The Risks of France\u2019s Political Victory in the Sahel what he thought would do? bc seemed vulnerable was.) How many years did u know, @stanford? another one of my professors reported him \u2013 jay fliegelman \u2013 i have to keep saying the name \u2013 so he was suspended for two years. and then for years more everyone acted like nothing had happened. it\u2019s incredible. Stohl told Stanford Politics that she could not elaborate much beyond her public tweets but she does recall being warned by a fellow student of Fliegelman. She also stated, \u201cHe had married a grad student and we all knew to be careful.\u201d Stanford Politics is looking into Fliegelman\u2019s marital history, but he was reportedly going through a divorce at the time he assaulted Seo-Young Chu, and the wife who survived him, Christine Guth, was the result of a later marriage. Stanford Politics has reached out to University Communications for comment about how long the University was unaware of Fliegelman\u2019s inappropriate behavior and for clarification on the history of University policy on consensual relationships between faculty and students. Sexual harassment at Stanford has been a known problem since at least 1993, and the current version of Stanford policy on the topic, which went into effect that year, prohibits \u201csexual or romantic relationships \u2014 whether regarded as consensual or otherwise \u2014 between individuals in inherently unequal positions.\u201d This story will be updated to reflect any statements received after publication. Update, Dec. 3, 5:00pm PT: Three paragraphs added to reflect comment received from Lydia Alix Fillingham. Andrew Granato contributed reporting. 1 comment Sort by Marcy Lynne creative non-fiction piece\"? In academia, we call that an essay. Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 7y Monique Morgan Have you read it? If you do, you'll understand the label. Like \u00b7 Reply \u00b7 7y Facebook Comments Plugin Oldest Add a comment... \uf09a \uf099 \uf0e0 2/22/25, 10:24 Former students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s - Stanford Politics 3/3", "7582_106.pdf": "City University of New York (CUNY) City University of New York Academic Works Academic Works Publications and Research Queens College 2024 Survivor-Shaped Specters and Gaps Survivor-Shaped Specters and Gaps Seo-Young J. Chu Queens College How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know! More information about this work at: Discover additional works at: This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Subscribe to our newsletter for news and updates! Email Address Subscribe 584 Castro Street #2006 San Francisco 94114 Copyright \u00a9 2023 Callisto Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Service Looking Ahead Jan 11 Survivor-Shaped Specters and Gaps guest blog post by Seo-Young Chu Content Warning: We are honored to share Seo-Young\u2019s experience but please note that this may be distressing to some readers, as it discusses rape and suicide. We hope that by sharing her story, others may find hope and community. In the year 2000, during the month of February, a young Korean American woman named Jennie Chu nearly became a victim-shaped gap in academia. She had just turned 22 years old. She was a first-year PhD student in the English Department at Stanford University. She was working as a teaching assistant for Jay Fliegelman, a tenured academic in his fifties and the William Robertson Coe Professor in American Literature. Unlike Jennie Chu, who was new to Stanford, new to California, and new to the profession, Professor Fliegelman had been teaching at Stanford for decades. In fact, Professor Fliegelman had received his own PhD from Stanford before Jennie was even born. Shortly after Jennie\u2019s 22nd birthday, Jay Fliegelman raped Jennie Chu. Shortly after the rape, Jennie tried to end her life. Somehow survived. After a grueling investigation that resulted in my abuser being suspended for two years without pay changed my name from Jennie to Seo-Young and transferred to Harvard in 2001, switching my field from Early American literature to science fiction. In 2007, while struggling to find a job in academia completed my dissertation and received my PhD. What did not know at the time: While was on the job market, my abuser was being honored with a \u201cJayfest\u201d\u2014a 2007 conference at Stanford celebrating Jay Fliegeman\u2019s life, mentorship, and scholarship\u2014and was being blacklisted. Shortly after my abuser\u2019s death in August 2007, Stanford honored him with a memorial resolution that made no mention of his predation. In addition, Stanford acquired my abuser\u2019s collection of expensive rare books\u2014some of which he used to groom my younger self as well as other women (most of whom wish to remain unnamed)\u2014and named it the Fliegelman Library. And both Stanford and the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies named mentorship awards in Jay Fliegelman\u2019s honor. It wasn\u2019t until received tenure at Queens College, CUNY, in 2016 that felt brave enough to google \u201cJay Fliegelman.\u201d Only then did learn about the mentorship awards, the library, the memorial resolution, the coverup. In November 2017 published Refuge for Jae-in Doe,\u201d an essay documenting the afterlife of what happened to me at Stanford. To my surprise, the essay attracted media attention spent my post- tenure sabbatical\u2014during which was supposed to be completing a book manuscript on North Korea\u2014sharing my story with journalists (see the sources listed below), working to remove my abuser\u2019s name from mentorship awards, meeting with and listening to other survivors (including others who were abused by Jay Fliegelman), and trying to transform our collective trauma into meaningful action. In the years since first publicly disclosed am a survivor in 2017, it has become increasingly clear to me that survivors are disappearing from academia. Our schools, our syllabi, our classrooms, our bibliographies, our campuses, our research labs, our thesis committees, our libraries, our conference panels, our departments, our programs, and our monographs are riddled through and through with survivor-shaped gaps. Each gap is a place in academia where someone has gone missing due to bullying, harassment, retaliation, predation, sexual assault, mobbing, and/or other abuses of power. Some of these gaps are shaped like allies who have left academia due to moral injury. Not every gap, moreover, is shaped like a survivor. Not every victim survives. Even though survived and am still in academia am not quite fully a survivor-shaped presence teach online on account of threats, rape trauma, and agoraphobia stay away from many academic conferences in order to avoid running into professors in the Stanford English department and others who enabled and/or defended my abuser have had to recuse myself from reviewing manuscripts that cite my abuser\u2019s work have given up on becoming a full professor. To this day, when a male colleague in a position of power expresses interest in my work wonder if my work is actually interesting or if he is interested in raping me. In some sense am a survivor-shaped ghost, an absent presence, a kind of academic shadow or specter. Like other academic specters am what academia tries to forget and repress. Like all ghosts, we haunt. How can we make our presence less haunting, less spectral, more vivid, and more concrete? How can we build community, solidarity, agency, and dialogue among those who have been displaced from academia? Is it possible to measure and even reclaim the knowledge we have lost to rape culture and abuses of power? What would it mean to illuminate the victim- and survivor-shaped gaps in higher education? How can we use our collective ingenuity and expertise to repair broken systems, get justice for survivors, and make the problem of rape culture legible and thus amenable to rewriting don\u2019t have all the answers do believe that in order to answer such questions, we need resources like Callisto. Callisto can help to illuminate the survivor-shaped gaps. Callisto can help us to reclaim the knowledge we have lost to rape culture and abuses of power. Callisto can help build community, solidarity, agency, and dialogue among those who have been displaced from academia. Callisto can help to transform those of us who are survivor-shaped absences and ghosts into active participants in a larger movement\u2014in academia and beyond. Callisto can help to prevent what happened to me from ever happening to anyone else. #MeToo #MeTooAcademia Related Refuge for Jae-in Doe: Fugues in the Key of English Major (Entropy Magazine) After Refuge for Jae-in Doe Social Media Chronology (ASAP/ Journal ended up being hospitalized again (The Cut, New York Magazine) Dear Stanford: You must reckon with your history of sexual violence (Stanford Daily) How #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser \u2014 Testimonies (New York Magazine) KoreanAmericanStory.org #MeToo Project (KoreanAmericanStory.org) I, Discomfort Woman Fugue in Minor (The Margins/Asian American Writers\u2019 Workshop) Other relevant sources (in chronological order): \u201cGhost From the Past: Professor\u2019s essay about being harassed and raped by her late adviser sparks calls for public acknowledgment of the reasons for his past suspension from Stanford and the renaming of a disciplinary society mentorship award that bore his name.\u201d By Colleen Flaherty (November 9, 2017). professor-sparks-call-public-acknowledgment-stanford-and \u201c2 Women Say Stanford Professors Raped Them Years Ago.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 11, 2017). them-years-ago Executive Board Statement on Harassment and Abuse\u201d (November 11, 2017) statement-on-harassment-and-abuse/ \"English faculty told to redirect press questions on sexual assault allegations to University communications.\" By Brian Contreras (Nov. 13, 2017, 1:00 a.m.). questions-on-sexual-assault-allegations-to-university-communications \u201cSexual Harassment and Assault in Higher Ed: What\u2019s Happened Since Weinstein.\u201d By Nell Gluckman , Brock Read, Bianca Quilantan, and Katherine Mangan 13, 2017). higher-ed-whats-happened-since-weinstein/ \u201cEditorial Board: Let\u2019s hold faculty to a higher standard on sexual assault.\u201d Opinion by Vol. 252 Editorial Board (Nov. 14, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). higher-standard-on-sexual-assault/ \u201cHere\u2019s What Sexual Harassment Looks Like in Higher Education.\u201d By Katherine Mangan 16, 2017). in-higher-education/ \u201cOpen Letter from Alumni to Stanford: Not in Our Name.\u201d by 22, 2017). our-name Professor Is Kind of Like a Priest\u2019: Two recent cases reveal how the structure of American graduate schools enables sexual harassment and worse.\u201d By Irene Hsu and Rachel Stone (Nov. 30, 2017). \"Stanford: Sexual misconduct revelation exposes storied professor's secret.\" (Dec. 1, 2017). revelation-exposes-storied-professors-secret/ \u201cBehind the Fliegelman sexual misconduct investigation.\u201d By Fangzhou Liu (Dec. 2, 2017, 3:37 p.m.). misconduct-investigation/ \u201cFormer students of Jay Fliegelman describe inappropriate relationships, sexual misconduct in 1980s, 1990s.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 3, 2017). \u201cAn open letter to Stanford on sexual harassment in academia.\u201d Opinion by Gloria Fisk and From the Community (Dec. 5, 2017, 3:00 a.m.). harassment-in-academia/ NOTE: Professor Alex Woloch has yet to respond (December 2023). \u201cWhat Happens When Sex Harassment Disrupts Victims\u2019 Academic Careers.\u201d By Nell Gluckman 6, 2017). disrupts-victims-academic-careers/ \u201cFormer Grad Students: Our Professors Raped Us.\u201d By Vanessa Ranca\u00f1o (Dec 7, 2017). speak-out-against-sexual-misconduct-by-professors \u201c\u2018Fairly Normal and Routine\u2019: 50 Years of Sexual Violence at Stanford.\u201d By RUAIR\u00cd 31, 2018). \u201cProvost, General Counsel offer personal contributions to anti-sexual assault organization after Stanford denies Fliegelman victim\u2019s request for donation.\u201d By Alex Tsai (Feb. 26, 2018, 12:20 a.m.). personal-contributions-to-anti-sexual-assault-organization-after-stanford- denies-fliegelman-victims-request-for-donation/ \u201cMoving Forward by Looking Back: Feminist Scholars in Solidarity with Seo- Young Chu and PARRE\u00d1AS (March 16, 2018) scholars-solidarity-seo-young-chu/ \u201cAcademia\u2019s #MeToo moment: \u2018I\u2019m really struck by how endemic this is\u2019: \u2018There isn\u2019t a day in my life when haven\u2019t been eaten away by it in some way.\u2019\u201d By Nick Anderson (May 10, 2018). moment-women-accuse-professors-of-sexual- misconduct/2018/05/10/474102de-2631-11e8-874b-d517e912f125_story.html \u201c\u2018My Professional World Has Gotten Smaller\u2019: How sexual harassment and assault distort scholars\u2019 lives in the academy.\u201d By Julia Schmalz 11, 2018). smaller/ \u201cStanford One Year After #MeToo: How Stanford\u2019s Response Failed Victims of Sexual Assault.\u201d By 14, 2019). stanfords-response-failed-victims-of-sexual-assault/ \u201cHow #MeToo Helped Seo-Young Chu Name Her Harasser \u2014 Testimonies New York Magazine\u201d (Sep 29, 2019). v=2tVhymU3DcM&list=PLXQRPSEGHTBiFsePIdraK3KNHvXQ1iFaM&index=7 \"Was It Worth It?\" By Irin Carmon and Amelia Schonbek. Additional reporting by Sarah Jones (Sept. 30, 2019). and-what-comes-after.html \u201cTitle at Stanford timeline of recent events.\u201d By Emma Talley, Kate Selig, Sarina Deb, Daniel Wu, Ujwal Srivastava, Lauryn Johnson, Anastasiia Malenko and Danielle Echeverria (June 9, 2020, 11:35 p.m.). recent-events/ \u201cThis\u2014trying to get Stanford to rename the Fliegelman Library\u2014is one of the projects I\u2019ve been working on this year. It\u2019s degrading and mostly invisible work, but feel compelled to do it. I\u2019m sharing the email below because want there to be a record (outside my \u201csent messages\u201d) that tried to do something. Unlike my 22-year-old self am not running away from what happened.\u201d By Seo-Young Chu. (July 1, 2021) \u201cStanford removes library collection, brick honoring affiliates accused of sexual misconduct.\u201d By Cameron Ehsan, Victoria Hsieh and Kathryn Zheng (July 9, 2021, 5:10 p.m.). brick/ \u201cThe Impossible, Crucial Task of Teaching About Rape as a Survivor\u201d by Emily Van Duyne (April 18, 2022). a-survivor/ Our Tools About Us Resources Get Involved News & Events Sign Up Donate"} |
8,649 | James Kielbaso | Michigan State University | [
"8649_101.pdf",
"8649_102.pdf",
"8649_103.pdf"
] | {"8649_101.pdf": "Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct Kara Berg Lansing State Journal Published 9:13 a.m Jan. 12, 2022 Updated 9:39 a.m Jan. 12, 2022 retired emeritus professor at Michigan State University was stripped of his title several years after being found responsible for sexual misconduct. James Kielbaso, a former professor emeritus in the Department of Forestry, was found in 2018 to have made inappropriate comments and unwanted sexual advances toward a student. Kielbaso kept his emeritus status until recently, when it was revoked because of the sexual misconduct finding. Sexual misconduct: Despite warnings, multiple reports of sexual misconduct, faculty remain employed at Revoking the title: Michigan State strips two retired professors of emeritus title after sexual harassment inquiry long investigation: Former students poorly handled report of sexual misconduct against history professor In January 2020, in lieu of commenting on the sexual misconduct finding, Kielbaso sent a photo of a note written by the woman who said he sexually harassed her. The note says, \u201cThank you so much for believing in me and all you have done for me in the past. You\u2019ve been a great help personally and professionally.\u201d Kielbaso said this note was from \u201cwell after graduation and into a full time job and successful career.\u201d The woman, however, said Kielbaso pressured her into writing the note for him, which was included in her thesis \u2014 not well after graduation, she said. 2/22/25, 10:25 Retired professor loses emeritus title after sexual misconduct 1/2 was threatened that 'would regret not thanking him,'\" the woman wrote in an email. \"He was manipulative, used his power and rank over me for selfish gain and absolutely stole several years of my life. He used my degree as bait to keep me around in his disgusting game. It was exhausting.\" She said she is grateful he lost his emeritus status, but is \"disgusted\" that despite MSU's finding that he sexually harassed her, he still appears to believe he did not do anything wrong. Kielbaso was one of at least four retired professors and administrators who were allowed to keep their emeritus title despite being found to have violated policies on sexual misconduct spokesperson Dan Olsen said prior to June 2019, all faculty, academic staff and executive managers automatically received emeritus status upon their retirement. Thomas Vogel, a former professor emeritus in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Charles Steinfield, professor emeritus in the Department of Media and Information, were both stripped of their titles in May. William Latta, an emeritus assistant vice president for operations, has kept his emeritus status, Olsen said. Because the university knew of his sexual misconduct prior to granting him emeritus status, they cannot revoke it now, he said is looking at changes to its emeritus policy to possibly change this, Olsen said. Contact reporter Kara Berg at 517-377-1113 or [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter @karaberg95. 2/22/25, 10:25 Retired professor loses emeritus title after sexual misconduct 2/2", "8649_102.pdf": "Lansing State Journal Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct Kara Berg, Lansing State Journal Wed, January 12, 2022 at 2:39 2 min read retired emeritus professor at Michigan State University was stripped of his title several years after being found responsible for sexual misconduct. Top Stories Musk\u2019s blitzkrieg savings 7-planet parade Trump 3rd term control Military b Search the web 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 1/7 James Kielbaso, a former professor emeritus in the Department of Forestry, was found in 2018 to have made inappropriate comments and unwanted sexual advances toward a student. Kielbaso kept his emeritus status until recently, when it was revoked because of the sexual misconduct finding. Sexual misconduct: Despite warnings, multiple reports of sexual misconduct, faculty remain employed at Revoking the title: Michigan State strips two retired professors of emeritus title after sexual harassment inquiry long investigation: Former students poorly handled report of sexual misconduct against history professor In January 2020, in lieu of commenting on the sexual misconduct finding, Kielbaso sent a photo of a note written by the woman who said he sexually harassed her. The note says, \u201cThank you so much for believing in me and all you have done for me in the past. You\u2019ve been a great help personally and professionally.\u201d Kielbaso said this note was from \u201cwell after graduation and into a full time job and successful career.\u201d The woman, however, said Kielbaso pressured her into writing the note for him, which was included in her thesis \u2014 not well after graduation, she said was threatened that 'would regret not thanking him,'\" the woman wrote in an email. \"He was manipulative, used his power and rank over me for selfish gain and absolutely stole several years of my life. He used my degree as bait to keep me around in his disgusting game. It was exhausting.\" She said she is grateful he lost his emeritus status, but is \"disgusted\" that despite MSU's finding that he sexually harassed her, he still appears to believe 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 2/7 he did not do anything wrong. Kielbaso was one of at least four retired professors and administrators who were allowed to keep their emeritus title despite being found to have violated policies on sexual misconduct spokesperson Dan Olsen said prior to June 2019, all faculty, academic staff and executive managers automatically received emeritus status upon their retirement. Thomas Vogel, a former professor emeritus in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Charles Steinfield, professor emeritus in the Department of Media and Information, were both stripped of their titles in May. William Latta, an emeritus assistant vice president for operations, has kept his emeritus status, Olsen said. Because the university knew of his sexual misconduct prior to granting him emeritus status, they cannot revoke it now, he said is looking at changes to its emeritus policy to possibly change this, Olsen said. Contact reporter Kara Berg at 517-377-1113 or [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter @karaberg95. This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Retired professor loses emeritus title after sexual misconduct About Our Ads Solve the daily Crossword 38,858 people played the daily Crossword recently. Can you solve it faster than others 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 3/7 Crossword Play on Yahoo Recommended articles 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 4/7 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 5/7 Yahoo Politics 2024 Election World Health Science The 360 Contact Us Originals Help Share Your Feedback 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 6/7 \u00a9 2025 Yahoo. All rights reserved. About Us About Our Ads Site Map 2/22/25, 10:25 Third retired professor stripped of emeritus title after sexual misconduct 7/7", "8649_103.pdf": "\uf002 \uf26c Watch Now Quick links strips retired professor of emeritus title over sexual misconduct \uf09a\ue61b\uf0e0 Photo by: Michigan State University \uf26c Watch Now Menu 2/22/25, 10:25 strips former prof of emeritus title for sexual misconduct 1/5 By: Yasmeen Ludy Posted 2:50 PM, Jan 12, 2022 LANSING, Mich. \u2014 James Kielbaso, a former professor at Michigan State University, was stripped of his emeritus title after the university found he had sexually harassed a student. Kielbaso, a retired professor in the Department of Forestry, was accused of sexual harassment and making inappropriate comments toward one of his students. \"While the revocations may not undo the harm caused by this individual, our actions make clear that even retired individuals can and will be held accountable for violating university policy while at Michigan State University when new evidence is brought forward spokesperson Dan Olsen said in a statement. Want to see more local news? Visit the FOX47News Website. Stay in touch with us anytime, anywhere. Dr. Kevin Guskiewicz named the next president of Michigan State University. Read More 00:00 02:00 \uf26c Watch Now 2/22/25, 10:25 strips former prof of emeritus title for sexual misconduct 2/5 Sign up for newsletters emailed to your inbox. Select from these options: Neighborhood News, Breaking News, Severe Weather, School Closings, Daily Headlines, and Daily Forecasts. Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Copyright 2022 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign up for the Breaking News Newsletter and receive up to date information. E-mail Submit Republicans Could End Double Taxation for Americans Abroad Next Year Paid Content: Mansion Global \uf26c Watch Now 2/22/25, 10:25 strips former prof of emeritus title for sexual misconduct 3/5 Online Jobs in from Pakistan (Salaries Will Surprise You) Paid Content: Search Ads Best Universities For An Degree In The Paid Content Degr\u2026 [Pics] World\u2019s First Surviving Septuplets \u2013 Look At Them 20\u2026 Paid Content: Journalist\u2026 Watch Michigan State vs Michigan on FOX47 \uf26c Watch Now 2/22/25, 10:25 strips former prof of emeritus title for sexual misconduct 4/5 Neighborhood News Neighborhood Weather Planner Rebound Jobs at 47 Support Sitemap Do Not Sell My Info Privacy Policy Privacy Center Journalism Ethics Guidelines Terms of Use Careers Public File Public File Contact Application Accessibility Statement Scripps Media Trust Center Closed Captioning Contact \uf09a\uf16d\ue61b\uf167 Scripps Local Media \u00a9 2025 Scripps Media, Inc Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way \uf26c Watch Now 2/22/25, 10:25 strips former prof of emeritus title for sexual misconduct 5/5"} |
7,395 | Charles Carlsen | Johnson County Community College | [
"7395_101.pdf",
"7395_102.pdf"
] | {"7395_101.pdf": "Search March 13, 2007 citizen\u2019s right to know and journalists\u2019 rights to report are threatened every day, say the organizers of Sunshine Week, who planned the weeklong program to highlight freedom of information issues and emphasize the importance of open government. The Student Press Law Center is celebrating Sunshine Week with a series of reports on how student journalists can encourage open government and use open records to expand their journalistic horizons and let the sunshine in. Student journalist Miguel Morales has reported stories that have rocked his community college\u2019s foundations. But after unearthing controversies by using open records requests and building trust with key whistleblowers, Morales said reporting on campus issues has only become tougher. For the 39-year-old Morales, journalism was not his first pursuit in life. After spending about 10 years as a outreach worker, Morales enrolled part-time at Johnson County Community College in Kansas in 2001 and set his sights on a career in journalism. \u201cWriting was the one thing could always do,\u201d he said. In March 2005, Morales received an anonymous e-mail from someone who told him to examine attachments to the agenda of a recent board of trustees meeting. He did, but found nothing that seemed out of the ordinary WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 1/6 Earlier this week RECORDS: Local restaurant health inspections provide story ideas, service to readers News Flash, 3/12/2007 WEEK: Here comes the sun News Flash, 3/12/2007 Last year\u2019s stories look at how college journalists can use open records News Flash, 3/17/2006 Legislatures in two states to consider opening campus police records News Flash, 3/16/2006 University foundations\u2019 secrecy at odds with public\u2019s right to know News Flash, 3/15/2006 look at how high school journalists can use open records News Flash, 3/14/2006 High school journalists dig through public records to get the real dirt News Flash, 3/13/2006 Morales then received a tip and documentation from his anonymous source that documented that Charles Carlsen, the college\u2019s president, had allegedly sexually harassed college administrator Teresa Lee since 2003. Lee alleged that Carlsen had touched her breast with his forearm and performed other acts that made her feel uncomfortable. College officials had not responded to Lee\u2019s complaints against Carlsen, the popular leader of a campus with a performing arts center that bears his name. Lee agreed to speak on the record for a story, understanding it could lead to her losing her job, Morales said. While none of Lee\u2019s coworkers could confirm her claims, Morales confronted Carlsen about the accusations. During an interview, he said that the president\u2019s face said it all. \u201cHe just turned red,\u201d Morales said of Carlsen\u2019s reaction when asked about the harassment allegations. Carlsen denied everything Lee alleged in the complaint. 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 2/6 Following the meeting with Carlsen, Mark Ferguson, the college\u2019s attorney, confronted Morales about investigation, saying Lee\u2019s accusations were not credible felt he was intimidating me into not writing this story,\u201d Morales said. Despite the perceived threats, Morales continued to investigate and found another potential instance of unaddressed sexual harassment, which involved student employee Andrea Evans and her campus services department supervisors. After Evans shared documents she kept that detailed the harassment charges, Morales\u2019 harassment story broadened. After reporting for more than a year, The Campus Ledger published the results of Morales\u2019 investigation on April 14, 2006. In two stories, he detailed the harassment claims involving the president and the campus services employees. Less than a week later, Carlsen resigned from his post after 25 years as president. The college board of trustees launched an independent investigation into the matter. The campus services employees in the other alleged harassment case left the college have had two heart attacks, an angioplasty, and quintuple bypass surgery. It is apparent to me from the stress of the last two weeks that immediate retirement is the appropriate step to take,\u201d Carlsen wrote in his resignation letter, dated Apr. 20, 2006. After the stories were published, The Campus Ledger received another lead \u2014 this time from one of the former campus services managers. The former manager alleged that the college was improperly paying overtime to campus employees. Along with reporter Kevin Mimms, the student journalists began looking into the matter, but because of the controversy surrounding Carlsen\u2019s departure, administrators would tell little to Campus Ledger reporters, hesitant of further negative publicity, Morales said. \u201cIt\u2019s my story that\u2019s not getting them the quotes that they need,\u201d Morales said. The two turned to using open records requests to get the information they needed \u2014 but found further road blocks. \u201cDenied left and right\u201d College officials declined open records requests for budget information that would show potential overtime violations because their letters were \u201cpoorly worded\u201d and even criticized 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 3/6 the reporters for using the Student Press Law Center\u2019s state open records request letter generator, rather than authoring the open records letters themselves, Morales said request is a request whether it\u2019s [from] a letter generator or if it\u2019s written in crayon,\u201d Morales said in an e-mail. Morales recalled one instance where an administrator denied an open records request because \u201cyou\u2019re going to write a story about it.\u201d \u201cIt got to the point last spring where they weren\u2019t responding at all,\u201d Morales said. With an interim president still to be named and as the independent investigation into Lee\u2019s alleged sexual harassment was scheduled to end in the June 2006, Morales and his staff asked the college\u2019s publication board for permission to publish throughout the summer. The publication board approved the request, but it was soon overruled by the college board of trustees, which Morales said, \u201cdidn\u2019t want to spend any more money\u201d for a summer paper. But Morales and Mimms would not let that stop them from chasing the story. \u201cWe scraped up our money, found a printer and got donations from employees and students at the college, and published our own paper,\u201d Morales said. By July 2006, Morales and Mimms had reported in The Lexicon \u2014 the alternative paper they created \u2014 on the search for a new president and the results of the independent investigation confirming Carlsen\u2019s harassment, which cost the college more than half a million dollars. Today, Morales says many open records requests continue to be refused by administrators without clear reasoning, but he said the newspaper is \u201cjust collecting all our rejections\u201d hoping to \u201cintegrate them into a story think they just don\u2019t know what information citizens can request nor do they know what they can release,\u201d Morales said. \u201cSo our information requests get denied as a precaution.\u201d Johnson County Community College spokeswoman Julie Haas said administrators understand which records are public under state law. She said the college has responded to every records request from Campus Ledger reporters. 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 4/6 \u201cWe responded to everything that know of,\u201d Haas said want to know what it was that [Morales] perceives that we didn\u2019t fulfill.\u201d While he has received some of the budget information requested, Morales said the data has been difficult to interpret. \u201cWe asked for budget numbers. They\u2019re not giving it to us electronically, they\u2019re giving us [printed] spreadsheets,\u201d Morales said. \u201cIt\u2019s hard for us to manipulate the data.\u201d Morales would not clarify which documents or the sources of the data he is requesting for his ongoing investigation into alleged overtime violations, saying only that the college\u2019s budget and documents related to it are a \u201ctreasure trove\u201d of information. \u201cIt didn\u2019t really hit me\u201d Morales and The Campus Ledger staff\u2019s efforts did not go unrecognized. At its convention held in August 2006, the Society of Professional Journalists awarded Morales and Campus Ledger staff with the First Amendment Award given to individuals and groups for efforts to preserve and strengthen the First Amendment for their harassment story. Morales said when he found out about the honor, he did not understand the magnitude of the award. He said he was unsure if he should even make the drive to Chicago to accept the award, but his instructors told him that it was \u201ca big deal and [he] should really go.\u201d Even though college administrators are now more hesitant when a Ledger reporter makes an inquiry, Morales said he \u201cwouldn\u2019t do anything different\u201d in his reporting of the harassment story. He said it is best to get to know the people in campus offices and use formal open records requests as a last resort. \u201cBe nice \u2014 know where document is,\u201d Morales said. \u201cDon\u2019t just slap the letter down on [the administrator\u2019s] desk.\u201d Morales said he plans on graduating from Johnson County Community College at the end of the summer, and wants to complete his degree at the University of Kansas. Eventually, he said he would like to return to Johnson County Community College to teach journalism. For Morales, whose name means \u201cmorals\u201d in Spanish, he said he believes he \u201cfinally found my calling\u201d in journalism. 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 5/6 \u22c5 1 7 1 7 9 0 0 . 2 0 0 0 6 ( 2 0 2 ) 7 8 5 - 5 4 5 0 : 5 2 - 11 8 4 6 4 7 \u00a9 2 0 2 5 let my ethics and integrity guide me,\u201d he said. By Jared Taylor staff writer Visit the Student Press Law Center\u2019s information page on access to records, meetings and places Try the SPLC\u2019s fully automated state open records request generator Visit Sunshine Week\u2019s Web site for more information on how to get involved 2/22/25, 10:26 WEEK: Student journalist fights for access at community college - Student Press Law Center 6/6", "7395_102.pdf": "The Carlsen Center: It\u2019s time for change Written by Samantha Joslin It\u2019s been thirteen years, and it seems like nothing has changed. In 2006, college President Charles Carlsen was accused of sexually harassing a female college employee. The previously popular Carlsen, after a series of board meetings and sudden, harsh scrutiny from students and the community, decided to step down as president in the wake of the accusation. Upon further investigation, more women came forward with claims of unwanted touching by Carlsen, choosing to keep their allegations off-record. Carlsen\u2019s name, already stamped in big letters on the campus\u2019 proudest building, was suddenly and definitively tarnished. And yet here we are, more than a decade later \u2014 and there Carlsen\u2019s name is, unremoved, unchanged, unquestioned. Most students are oblivious to Carlsen\u2019s transgressions, and January 27, 2020 Photo by: Mena Haas 2/22/25, 10:26 The Carlsen Center: It\u2019s time for change | The Campus Ledger 1/3 probably his very existence as an impactful piece of the college\u2019s past. That\u2019s how it goes in two-year junior colleges: people forget. We can\u2019t afford to let Carlsen\u2019s history slip pleasantly from our minds, though, no matter how much easier that might be. Things were different in 2006. Going through the process of changing a building name over an unproven sexual harassment accusation might\u2019ve seemed dramatic to many. Now, we have entered a time when allegations of this sort are given the weight they deserve, and thank God for that. I\u2019m relieved and, sadly enough, grateful that the fight against sexual harassment and \u201crape culture\u201d has risen as a paramount issue in modern- day America. This popularity of the anti-rape culture movement has made The Carlsen Center stick out like a sore thumb in the otherwise respectful and progressive legacy of Johnson County Community College. It is a blaring signal that the college does not take sexual assault allegations seriously, a signal transmitted weakly to the oblivious students attending classes in the building, the teachers giving lessons in its classrooms, the janitors cleaning its hallways and the community members attending musical performances and magic shows in its theatres. Since one out of every six American women will be the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime, as published by the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network, we can assume that many of these students, teachers, janitors, and community members have had personal experiences with sexual assault or harassment. Whatever tedious work, public opinion or cost that may arise from pursuing a building name change utterly pales in comparison to the discomfort and disrespect our college forces upon victims of sexual assault by leaving Charles Carlsen\u2019s name on one of our campus\u2019 buildings. Does the college truly want to continue branding itself as an institution that honors the accomplishments of someone facing multiple sexual harassment accusations? What does that say about us? There are examples across the country of colleges changing building names upon deciding that the names no longer represent the college\u2019s image. Last year, Stanford University changed the name of a building and a street when their namesake was discovered to have had a harmful impact on Native American communities. Also last year, the University of Scranton renamed three buildings that were named after bishops in light of local catholic priests being accused of sexual assault. Duke University stripped two of its buildings of their names once it became clear that the figures they were named after were white supremacists. In 2004, a building name was changed at the University of Missouri after the student it was named after was accused of cheating by a roommate: the name was changed a mere week after those allegations arose. And yet, after thirteen years, the students and staff of our college are still waiting. 2/22/25, 10:26 The Carlsen Center: It\u2019s time for change | The Campus Ledger 2/3 Main Campus 12345 College Blvd Overland Park 66210 913-469-8500 Contact Accessibility Non-Discrimination Privacy Copyright Consumer Information ShopJCCC Media Resources Events Administration Alert Police Police Phone: 913-469-2500 Explore Careers at \u00a9 2025 Johnson County Community College | Terms of Use want to make it clear that the accusations against Carlsen remain unproven \u2014 that is, not proven to be true and not proven to be false. This brings up a hard question, one that crossed my mind a few times: what if he didn\u2019t do it? This question, even in my own thoughts, strikes me as highly patriarchal. When several people accuse someone of robbing them, most people\u2019s first response isn\u2019t, \u201care every single one of you lying?\u201d And when it comes to the building, the constant reminder of sexual harassment (if it\u2019s true) outweighs the status blow of a name removal (if it\u2019s false) by miles. As a college, as a community, as a society, we must ask ourselves if the possibility of innocence outweighs the horrific injustice of sexual harassment implore students, staff, and community members reading this article to voice their opinions on this issue to the Board of Trustees. It\u2019s truly as easy as sending an email. The more voices that are heard, the more the college\u2019s decisions will reflect the attitudes of those attending classes or working within its walls. Don\u2019t we owe it to ourselves to at least attempt to leave our college better off than how we found it? What would it feel like to leave this campus forever, knowing not only that such a stain still remains here, but that you didn\u2019t attempt to remove it? As Christine Caine said, \u201cIt is one thing to be awakened to injustice and quite another to be willing to be inconvenienced and interrupted to do something about it.\u201d Story by Samantha Joslin 2/22/25, 10:26 The Carlsen Center: It\u2019s time for change | The Campus Ledger 3/3"} |
7,778 | C. Keith Haddock | University of Missouri – Kansas City | [
"7778_101.pdf",
"7778_102.pdf",
"7778_103.pdf"
] | {"7778_101.pdf": "settles sexual harassment suit for $1.1 million By The Kansas City Star Megan Pinkston-Camp et al. v (Warning: Content may offend some readers) The work environment at a laboratory in UMKC\u2019s psychology department was so sexually charged that at least five women left in recent years after nothing was done about it. Now the University of Missouri-Kansas City has done something, agreeing to pay $1.1 million to two of those women to settle an explosive lawsuit. According to the suit, the two psychology professors who headed the lab \u2014 C. Keith Haddock and Walker S. Carlos Poston \u2014 created a hostile environment by seeking sexual favors, circulating torture videos and pornography, and physically intimidating female lab students and employees. But even though the university has agreed to pay what may be the largest amount it has ever shelled out in a sexual harassment case, the two men remain in charge of the lab, although it has been moved from UMKC\u2019s psychology department to its medical school. In fact, not long after the men moved from the psychology department to the medical school in late 2005, they were promoted from associate professors to full professors and given raises \u2014 from $76,707 to $101,707 in Poston\u2019s case and from $75,876 to $93,376 in Haddock\u2019s case. In a written statement to The Kansas City Star said that \u201cthe charge of sexual harassment is serious and the University of Missouri-Kansas City remains committed to due process in this matter. In our commitment to providing an appropriate environment, we are re-examining all information that was revealed during the litigation to determine if further action is needed didn\u2019t elaborate on what further action it might take. \u201cAs a matter of procedure,\u201d it said does not comment on litigation.\u201d The school, however, has expressly denied liability in the case. The lawsuit was filed a year ago in Jackson County Circuit Court by Linda S. Garavalia, an associate professor in the psychology department, and Megan Pinkston-Camp, a one-time doctoral student in the department who has since left and now lives in Maryland. In often graphic terms, the suit described an environment at the lab, then known as the Health Research Group, in which women were groped, fondled, subjected to explicit sexual comments and sexual advances, and generally made to understand that they needed to go along with the professors\u2019 behavior if they wanted to advance their careers. \u201cThese were very smart, very educated women,\u201d said Kansas City attorney Tammy Horn, who, with her partner Carrie Brous, represented Garavalia and Pinkston-Camp. \u201cThey were physically scared and they were scared about their careers. And they had no idea where to go for help.\u201d Haddock, who has a doctorate in clinical psychology from the University of Memphis, and Poston, who has a doctorate in counseling psychology from the University of California-Santa Barbara, work mainly in the areas of obesity epidemiology and tobacco control. Neither returned calls seeking comment. Haddock was chairman and Poston was associate chairman of UMKC\u2019s psychology department before they rotated out in mid-2004. In late 2005, after the plaintiffs complained about their behavior, the men, at their request, were transferred to the medical school, where they were offered tenured faculty positions in the department of informatic medicine. Both are large revenue generators for the university, mainly in the form of government grants, according to deposition testimony in the case. The story of Garavalia\u2019s and Pinkston-Camp\u2019s experiences at the Health Research Group appears to have been as much about their inability to obtain redress from the university as about the inappropriate behavior that took place in the lab. \u201cDr. Garavalia watched as multiple women felt they had no choice but to abandon their research efforts, dissertations, theses, grant opportunities, etc. to escape the sexually hostile environment created by Haddock and Poston,\u201d Horn said. In deposition testimony, the current head of UMKC\u2019s psychology department, Diane Filion, said that she went to six different people and an outside lawyer seeking help for the women. Eventually, Pinkston-Camp was directed to the head of UMKC\u2019s Affirmative Action Office, Darlene Scott-Scurry, who conducted an investigation that some psychology faculty members later called insufficiently thorough. Scott-Scurry never interviewed Garavalia, for example, or any other member of the psychology faculty besides Haddock and Poston. She spoke to only 11 of the 18 people who Pinkston-Camp told her were familiar with the situation in the lab. After finishing her investigation, Scott-Scurry wrote to Haddock and Poston that \u201ctestimony revealed that certain behaviors were occurring in the laboratory that had no place in a university environment.\u201d But she concluded that there was \u201cinsufficient evidence\u201d of a sexually hostile environment. Scott-Scurry has since left and taken a similar position at the University of Virginia. She did not respond to requests for comment. At least one psychology department member, associate professor Kathy Goggin, was alarmed enough by the harassment allegations to inform the Missouri State Committee of Psychologists \u2014 the state agency responsible for overseeing the practice of psychology in Missouri \u2014 of the complaints became involved when asked to assist students and junior faculty to leave Drs. Haddock and Poston\u2019s laboratory following what they perceived to be inappropriate behavior while under Drs. Haddock and Poston\u2019s supervision,\u201d she wrote the committee. Goggin went on to say that she had \u201cno personal knowledge of the most serious of these complaints\u201d and was therefore not filing a formal complaint. But she said she expected a formal complaint to be filed by the women. Goggin could not be reached for comment. Pinkston-Camp, who worked at the lab from August 2003 to June 2005, acknowledged that she eventually submitted to Poston\u2019s advances and had physical contact with him, though not sexual intercourse, on three occasions. But in an occasionally emotional telephone interview last week, she said she felt obliged to do so because of his power to make or break her career. \u201cHe was my supervisor,\u201d she said. \u201cHe was the one depended on for my research career, for everything.\u201d The last straw, she said, came when Poston scheduled a conference trip for the two of them in May 2005 and booked adjoining rooms at the conference hotel before, during and after the conference. She said she remained at the lab for a while longer because she didn\u2019t know where to turn and was too scared for her physical safety to leave. \u201cThey talked all the time about killing people, about hurting people, about how you look sexually, about their sexual preferences,\u201d Pinkston-Camp said. \u201cThey\u2019d bring up porn images on the computer screen to share with you.\u201d Pinkston-Camp and Garavalia said that they were subjected to choke holds by the professors, supposedly in \u201cgood fun,\u201d and that the men circulated torture videos showing animals being dismembered. Horn and Brous, the women\u2019s attorneys, said that Haddock and Poston had created a \u201ccult environment\u201d in which they used their power and threats of violence to control and dominate women in the lab. The cult, as Garavalia and Pinkston-Camp described it in the suit, extended to two other members of the lab \u2014 both of them women \u2014 who were involved in consensual relationships with Haddock and allegedly received special treatment as a result. Garavalia, who worked in the lab from January 2004 to February 2005 and recently received the dean\u2019s outstanding teaching award, said she was never overtly propositioned by Haddock or Poston. But she said she was told by them that she needed to be more of a \u201cteam player\u201d and saw them kissing and massaging other women in the lab, grabbing women from behind in choke holds, and referring to female students as \u201csluts.\u201d \u201cThere was a lot of pressure to conform,\u201d she said. \u201c \u2026 There were no demands at first. And then slowly things escalated and there were these expectations.\u201d In sworn statements provided in the lawsuit, three other female students \u2014 their names were redacted for privacy reasons \u2014 backed up Garavalia\u2019s and Pinkston-Camp\u2019s allegations, describing an environment rife with graphic sexual banter and intimidating behavior heard Dr. Haddock say that he would kill someone if he needed to, he knew how to take care of killing people and he knew people who could kill people,\u201d one of the women said in her sworn statement saw a video on Dr. Haddock\u2019s computer of a fight between at least two people and one of the fighter\u2019s eyeballs was hanging out of his head. Dr. Haddock was calling other lab employees to view the violent video.\u201d Garavalia and Pinkston-Camp said they repeatedly tried to bring the situation at the lab to the university\u2019s attention. But they said they either didn\u2019t know where to turn or ran into bureaucratic obstacles. Filion, the psychology department head who tried to help the women, testified that she didn\u2019t know the university had an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Office. It was only last year that University of Missouri administrators got around to announcing a policy prohibiting \u201camorous relationships\u201d between university employees and students or between supervisors and subordinates. Administrators said the policy was needed to maintain a professional atmosphere on the campuses. The settlements with Pinkston-Camp and Garavalia call for the university to pay each woman $82,107 in lost wages and $246,322 in damages for emotional distress. Their attorneys are to get $443,141. Meanwhile, Haddock and Poston remain in charge of the lab. In fact, after they were interviewed by Scott-Scurry, the two were allowed to submit their own plan to ensure that sexual harassment didn\u2019t occur in the lab. \u201cWhat\u2019s sad to this day is that if someone has a sexual harassment complaint, I\u2019d have to tell them, \u2018You\u2019d better call (my attorneys) Tammy and Carrie,\u2019 because don\u2019t know what to tell them,\u201d Garavalia said.", "7778_102.pdf": "Professors resign after harrassment settlement Staff Writer Columbia Daily Tribune Published 12:01 a.m Aug. 12, 2008 (AP) - One year after the University of Missouri-Kansas City settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for $1.1 million, two tenured professors at the center of the case have agreed to resign. The agreement provides for psychology professors C. Keith Haddock and Walker S. Carlos Poston to be paid through the end of their contract year - Aug. 31, 2009 - and for them to fulfill their remaining academic obligations. Haddock and Poston will avoid tenure-revocation and dismissal proceedings, the university said in announcing the resignations yesterday. The two agreed not to reapply for jobs with UMKC. \"This agreement provides the opportunity for all parties to move forward with the mission of educating students and advancing research without the distraction of a protracted proceeding before a faculty committee,\" Gail Hackett, provost and vice chancellor for academic affairs, said in a statement. Sexual harassment complaints filed in 2005 triggered two internal investigations, neither of which has been made public. The complaints accused Haddock and Poston of groping, fondling and subjecting women to explicit sexual conversations in UMKC's psychology lab, where they supervised the staff. Two women who worked at the lab - an associate professor and a doctoral student - eventually sued the university, alleging it failed to respond in a timely way to the complaints. UMKC's affirmative action officer, Grace Hernandez, conducted the second investigation after the lawsuit was settled in 2007. Dozens of students, faculty and staff members were 2/22/25, 10:26 Professors resign after harrassment settlement 1/2 interviewed. In its statement yesterday said that \"because of significantly conflicting testimony among the witnesses, (Hernandez) felt the evidence was inconclusive\" as to whether Haddock and Poston had created a hostile work environment. The statement did not say why the university planned to initiate tenure-revocation proceedings if the evidence was inconclusive. In an e-mail message yesterday, an attorney for Haddock and Poston, Karen Glickstein, said Hernandez's investigation \"failed to substantiate that any sexual harassment, exploitation or hostile environment occurred\" in the men's laboratory. Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. 2/22/25, 10:26 Professors resign after harrassment settlement 2/2", "7778_103.pdf": "resign/article_d113a116-530f-5f8d-9ba6-af5034cdaf20.html 2 professors in sex harassment suit to resign By The Associated press Aug 12, 2008 - One year after the University of Missouri-Kansas City settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for $1.1 million, two tenured professors at the center of the case have agreed to resign. The agreement provides for psychology professors C. Keith Haddock and Walker S. Carlos Poston to be paid through the end of their contract year - Aug. 31, 2009 - and for them to fulfill their remaining academic obligations. Haddock and Poston will avoid tenure-revocation and dismissal proceedings, the university said in announcing the resignations on Monday. The two agreed not to reapply for jobs with UMKC. advertisement Privacy - Terms 2/22/25, 10:27 2 professors in sex harassment suit to resign | Higher Education | columbiamissourian.com 1/3 \"This agreement provides the opportunity for all parties to move forward with the mission of educating students and advancing research without the distraction of a protracted proceeding before a faculty committee,\" Gail Hackett, provost and vice chancellor for academic affairs, said in a statement. Sexual harassment complaints filed in 2005 triggered two internal investigations, neither of which has been made public. The complaints accused Haddock and Poston of groping, fondling and subjecting women to explicit sexual conversations in UMKC's psychology lab, where they supervised the staff. Two women who worked at the lab - an associate professor and a doctoral student - eventually sued the university, alleging it failed to respond in a timely way to the complaints. UMKC's affirmative action officer, Grace Hernandez, conducted the second investigation after the lawsuit was settled in 2007. Dozens of students, faculty and staff members were interviewed. In its statement Monday said that \"because of significantly conflicting testimony among the witnesses, (Hernandez) felt the evidence was inconclusive\" as to whether Haddock and Poston had created a hostile work environment. The statement did not say why the university planned to initiate tenure-revocation proceedings against the men if the evidence was inconclusive. But one of the plaintiffs, associate psychology professor Linda S. Garavalia, said she believed their agreement to give up their tenured positions spoke volumes was a little disheartened by the statement saying the results of the investigation were inconclusive,\" she said. \"But then, my thought was, the (university) is choosing not to make a statement that they're innocent or guilty, but its actions have already made that statement.\" advertisement 2/22/25, 10:27 2 professors in sex harassment suit to resign | Higher Education | columbiamissourian.com 2/3 Report an error Write a letter Send us feedback In an e-mail message Monday, an attorney for Haddock and Poston, Karen Glickstein, said Hernandez's investigation \"failed to substantiate that any sexual harassment, exploitation, or hostile environment occurred\" in the men's laboratory. Haddock, who has a doctorate in clinical psychology, and Poston, who has a doctorate in counseling psychology, work mainly in the areas of obesity epidemiology and tobacco control. The two formerly headed the Health Research Group, a laboratory at the university. In late 2005, after the complaints about their behavior in the psychology lab, Haddock and Poston were transferred to the medical school, where they were promoted from associate professors to full professors. Both were given raises - from $76,707 to $101,707 in Poston's case and from $75,876 to $93,376 in Haddock's case. 2/22/25, 10:27 2 professors in sex harassment suit to resign | Higher Education | columbiamissourian.com 3/3"} |
7,449 | Arthur R. Taylor | Muhlenberg College | [
"7449_101.pdf"
] | {"7449_101.pdf": "Arthur R. Taylor Arthur Robert Taylor (July 6, 1935 \u2013 December 3, 2015) was an American businessman. Taylor was born in Elizabeth, New Jersey. He was a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Brown University. He began his corporate career with the First Boston Corporation. He was later Vice President Finance and Executive Vice President of International Paper Company. He was president of from 1972 until 1976.[1][2] He then founded Arthur Taylor & Company, a private investment concern. In 1985, Fordham University named him dean of its Graduate School of Business Administration.[3] Taylor also served as president of Muhlenberg College for a decade (1992\u20132002), during which Muhlenberg tripled its endowment, halved its debt, and saw a significant rise in admissions selectivity.[4] Despite these institutional successes, Taylor's resignation in 2002 followed several meetings by the College Board of Trustees over his increasingly concerning behavior; this included an ongoing investigation by the Board that Taylor had been sexually harassing employees, supplemented by an anonymously- authored document submitted to the Board detailing those actions and other inappropriate behaviors.[5] At present, he is the College's only confirmed entry in the Academic Sexual Misconduct Database.[6] He was a former member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group.[7] He was married to Kathryn Pelgrift Taylor. Arthur Taylor died on December 3, 2015, from pulmonary failure in Allentown, Pennsylvania.[8] 1. Palochko, Jacqueline (December 4, 2015). \"Former Muhlenberg College leader dies\" ( mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-muhlenberg-arthur-taylor-dies-20151204-story.html). The Morning Call. Retrieved December 10, 2015. 2. Sally Bedell Smith, In All His Glory: The Life and Times of William S. Paley and the Birth of Modern Broadcasting, New York: Random House, 2002, p. 232. 3. \"Banker Fills Fordham Post\" ( ost.html). New York Times. November 17, 1985. Retrieved December 10, 2015. 4. \"Muhlenberg mourns the loss of Arthur Taylor, the 10th President of Muhlenberg College\" ( ww.muhlenberg.edu/latestnews/featuredstory/name,340659,en.html). Muhlenberg College. December 4, 2015. Retrieved December 10, 2015. 5. Farrell, Elizabeth F. \"Muhlenberg President Quits Under Fire\" ( uhlenberg-president-quits-under-fire/). The Chronicle of Higher Education. The Chronicle. Retrieved 24 August 2021. 6. Libarken, J. \"The Academic Sexual Misconduct Database\" ( atabase.org/). Academic Sexual Misconduct Database. Retrieved 24 August 2021. 7. \"Former Steering Committee Members\" ( w.bilderbergmeetings.org/former-steering-committee-members.html). bilderbergmeetings.org. Bilderberg Group. Archived from the original ( ommittee-members.html) on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 2014-02-08. References 2/22/25, 10:27 Arthur R. Taylor - Wikipedia 1/2 8. Barnes, Mike (9 December 2015). \"Arthur Taylor, Former President of CBS, Dies at 80\" ( w.hollywoodreporter.com/news/arthur-taylor-dead-cbs-president-847469). Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 6 October 2018. Retrieved from \" 2/22/25, 10:27 Arthur R. Taylor - Wikipedia 2/2"} |
8,778 | Mark Simon | State University of New York - Potsdam | [] | {} |
7,464 | Owen Cargol | Northern Arizona University | [
"7464_101.pdf",
"7464_102.pdf",
"7464_103.pdf"
] | {"7464_101.pdf": "Basketball restaurant, bar and party guide Write a letter to the Editor Contact the Daily Wildcat staff Send feedback to the web designers Arizona Student Media info... Daily Wildcat staff alumni... TV3 - student tv - student radio... Ex president sent suggestive e-mails to university By Associated Press Thursday November 15, 2001 male employee at Northern Arizona University complained that the school's former president made unwanted sexual advances toward him and sent him sexually suggestive e- mails, a newspaper reported yesterday. Owen Cargol, 50, was president for just four months before resigning Saturday when confronted with the allegations. The Arizona Board of Regents officially accepted Cargol's resignation Monday and appointed Provost John Haeger as acting president. The employee's complaint was supported by one or more e-mails containing \"vivid\" sexual overtures that Cargol sent the man, The Arizona Republic reported, citing sources familiar with the investigation. Cargol, a married father of two, told the newspaper Tuesday that he had \"interactions\" with the unnamed employee, but Cargol said they were \"misconstrued.\" \"If, in trying to build a friendship and help a friend build up self-confidence, my intentions were misinterpreted, then apologize,\" Cargol said in the statement. \"What asked the board to do was make sure the punishment fit the offense. In my opinion, a reprimand or suspension without pay would be much more appropriate if they felt had made a mistake in judgment.\" Cargol has an unlisted telephone number and couldn't be immediately reached for comment yesterday by The Associated Press. University officials declined to comment on the Republic's story. The Republic said that its sources, which were contacted separately, confirmed Tuesday that the allegations came from an employee who said Cargol had grabbed his genitals. Cargol later sent the man an e-mail that one source told the Republic was \"very clear in its nature - very vivid. You could see there was the (sexual) overture.\" When first confronted with the complaint, Cargol confirmed he had communicated with the man but denied impropriety, the sources told the Republic. In a Saturday meeting in Flagstaff, Regents President Kay McKay gave Cargol the choice of taking administrative leave or resigning, she said Monday at a press conference. He chose to resign. 2/22/25, 10:27 Ex president sent suggestive e-mails to university - Thursday November 15, 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat 1/2 McKay said Cargol, who was paid $180,000 a year plus allowances, would receive no severance pay or benefits. Formerly president of the University of Maine at Augusta, Cargol quickly became known at for an open-door policy, an eagerness to work with students and faculty and for a frequent presence at campus events. Some faculty members have objected to the speed and secrecy surrounding Cargol's departure. Cargol told the Republic he was speaking with attorneys. \"My family and are in shock,\" he said Lobbyists encouraged by legislative session 'Tunnel of Oppression' puts students in real-life situations Union restaurants meet health requirements SafeRide will not do drop offs at businesses Ex president sent suggestive e- mails to university Police Beat CatCalls Webmaster - [email protected] \u00a9 Copyright 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat - Arizona Student Media 2/22/25, 10:27 Ex president sent suggestive e-mails to university - Thursday November 15, 2001 - The Arizona Daily Wildcat 2/2", "7464_102.pdf": "Cargol getting job interviews May 6, 2002 Greg Bryan/Arizona Daily SunNew Northern Arizona University president Owen Cargol listens during a teleconference with the Council of Presidents Tuesday during his first day on the job. Former Northern Arizona University President Owen Cargol is on the hunt for a new job. Cargol, who was forced to resign amid sexual harassment charges last November after just four months on job, was selected last month as one of five finalists for the presidency at the College of the Siskiyous in northern California. Privacy - Terms 2/22/25, 10:27 Cargol getting job interviews | | azdailysun.com 1/1", "7464_103.pdf": "Cargol says his choices were resign or be fired By Sun Staff Reporter Nov 14, 2001 Owen Cargol says he was only trying to be friendly to the male Northern Arizona University employee who brought allegations of sexual harassment against him and it was a misunderstanding that led to his sudden resignation after only four months as NAU's president. He does not agree with the specifics of the allegations or how they've been framed as sexual harassment, he told the Daily Sun during an interview at his home Wednesday night think this is an unfortunate situation where the context of friendship was misinterpreted and it led to some unfortunate events,\" Cargol said did not agree with the content or the context of the allegations.\" The Arizona Republic reported the allegations focused on Cargol grabbing the employee's genitals and sending sexually suggestive e-mail to the man. Citing advice from legal counsel, Cargol declined to tell the Daily Sun whether he sexually touched the man, adding that he had not read the Republic story. In fact, Cargol said he has yet to see any formal paperwork detailing the allegations that led to what he interpreted as an ultimatum: either resign or be fired. Privacy - Terms 2/22/25, 10:28 Cargol says his choices were resign or be fired | | azdailysun.com 1/3 He said he was contacted by NAU's Affirmative Action Office Friday afternoon about the allegations a male employee made against him, but was told the employee wanted to resolve the matter informally and he agreed. That's why he said it was surprising during Saturday's meeting with Kay McKay, Arizona Board of Regents president, and legal counsel from and that he was given the option of either resigning or taking leave until the next time the regents could meet and officially terminate him. When asked to attend Saturday's meeting, Cargol said he was not aware the situation would be handled so drastically was just told the conversation would continue\" at the meeting, he said. However, McKay said it was only because Cargol admitted to the allegations that he was told he could either resign or soon be terminated. If Cargol had denied the allegations, the regents would have allowed him to go on leave while the allegations were investigated, she said. McKay also said she \"didn't disagree\" with reports that the allegations involved Cargol touching the employee's genitals and sending sexually suggestive e-mails to him. The regents met Monday to officially accept his resignation and appoint Provost John Haeger as acting president. Cargol asked to address the regents at the meeting, but was denied. He declined to tell the Daily Sun what he wanted to tell the regents. The regents are expected to offer Haeger a multi-year contract at their next meeting Nov. 29. Haeger has not announced who will take his place as provost on an interim basis. Cargol said he is consulting with legal counsel about what actions to take and declined to say whether he plans to sue. As for his immediate personal plans, he said he is still too stunned to make a decision. \"This is devastating for my family, for me, for the university (and) for my career,\" said Cargol, 50, who is married and has two children. \"Things seem to be going right along and all of sudden these allegations happen.\" Besides the formal allegations made by the unidentified male employee, several female students, faculty and employees complained informally about him being too physical and \"touchy\" during interactions with him. Betsy Buford, president of NAU's Associated Students for Women's Issues, said she had arranged a meeting with Cargol on Nov. 20 to discuss the complaints and let Cargol know \"not everyone on campus is as comfortable sharing their personal space as he is.\" 2/22/25, 10:28 Cargol says his choices were resign or be fired | | azdailysun.com 2/3 But though \"there was definitely buzz around campus about the way he treated students,\" Buford said she knew of no female students, faculty or employees who filed any formal complaints against Cargol. Cargol defended his physical style as merely being cordial and said he would always back off if he sensed another person did not appreciate his long hand shakes, hugs or kisses think most people you talk to would say I'm a very physically affectionate person,\" he said \"But if anyone says to me prefer not to be hugged or kissed or touched respect that.\" Meanwhile, several students are still offering support for their former president group of about 50 students has posted fliers throughout campus accusing the of \"a blatantly wrongful termination of Dr. Owen Cargol\" and \"the abandonment of sound procedure\" involving his resignation. Reporter Dan Rice can be reached at 556-2261 or [email protected]. \u2014 Arizona Daily Sun 2/22/25, 10:28 Cargol says his choices were resign or be fired | | azdailysun.com 3/3"} |
7,722 | Stephen M. Shellman | University of Georgia | [
"7722_101.pdf",
"7722_102.pdf"
] | {"7722_101.pdf": "09b4-53d2-9f81-b8cd21c51a69.html professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) Melissa Weinman Mar 24, 2008 \"Drunken\" nights with undergraduates and an \"emotional affair\" with a female student led a professor known for bringing in hundreds of thousands in grant money to resign after he was found in violation of the sexual harassment policy. According to documents obtained by The Red & Black through an open records request, Stephen M. Shellman, an assistant professor in the School of Public and International Affairs, admitted having a problem with alcohol and resigned March 7. He was under investigation by the Office of Legal Affairs for violating the University's Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy, which centered around two occasions involving alcohol and inappropriate contact with a student. The first incident occurred in June 2007, and the second incident concerns action on and around Feb. 12, 2008. Stephen Shewmaker, executive director for legal affairs, conducted the probe and at its completion, carbon copied documents to University President Michael Adams, Provost Arnett Mace and Dean Thomas Lauth. On Friday, Adams announced a change in the policy, which includes the addition of three ombudspersons and mandatory training for administrators. \"Some of the information you obtained is inaccurate and misrepresents the truth,\" Shellman wrote last week in an e-mail to The Red & Black. He declined to comment further Sunday night. The names of many of those involved were redacted, so due to the condition of the documents, The Red & Black is unable to identify all the speakers. Professor party foul 2/22/25, 10:28 professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) | News | redandblack.com 1/5 Shellman met up with a group of students and faculty and drank heavily at three downtown Athens bars. He tried to get an undergraduate female student to drink as well, but she did not want to and left the bar early, according to the documents. Shellman \"got hammered\" and left to follow the girl. \"Fac and stud tried to get him not to drive - to extent wrestle w/ faculty,\" according to the documents. Bryan Early, a graduate student out with Shellman that night, said in the documents he tried to put Shellman in his car and drive him home. But Shellman ran away, got into his own car and drove off. Shellman, \"drives to undergrad female house - tried to kick door down pretty descriptive sexual talk - she not let him in - she called police,\" according to documents. Shellman was so loud that the female student's neighbors were awakened. \"She locked front door + her bedroom door could hear him bellowing outside - got scared,\" the documents note. Shellman left before the police arrived, and while driving home, drove his car into a ditch, according to documents. He texted the student and said he crashed his car and \"need someone to pick him up and take home.\" The student called Shellman and said told you no call, no text, if you do it again will call police.\" He repeatedly tried calling and text messaging her. The student called Shellman back \"to warn him to never come back; stay away.\" Shellman responded know, it was so horrible.\" Shellman also sent Early a message that he crashed on the way home. Early drove to the east side of Athens toward Shellman's home and found his car, but could not find him. Early called Shellman's wife, who suggested he might be walking home. Early found him more than an hour later and drove him home. After the 'blackout' \"I'm in trouble, I'm told 'hit on' (redacted),\" documents state Shellman told his wife the next day. In the documents, Shellman told Shewmaker he blacked out and his memories fade in and out, but vaguely remembers being at Trappeze Bar, an apartment complex and walking home on College Station and Barnett Shoals roads. 2/22/25, 10:28 professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) | News | redandblack.com 2/5 Shellman had no memories of the interaction with the female student on Feb. 12. In a statement following his resignation, Shellman said he was informed by Early on Feb. 14 of what happened on Feb. 12 could not believe the story and was in shock,\" Shellman writes remember falling to my knees several times as he recounted the events cried and immediately phoned my wife to tell her the events related to me by my graduate student.\" But he sent the student a text message on Feb. 13 at 3:32 p.m. saying home by chance have your and owe you a serious apology.\" Shewmaker wrote in the documents that Shellman, \"lied to me about blackout cause text (redacted owe you apology on Wens' when claimed not know until Thurs when Bryan told him.\" On that Wednesday, the female student went to Athens-Clarke County Police to report the incident but didn't press charges. On Valentine's Day, Shellman's wife called the student to see if she planned to press charges. His wife said she, \"did not want him to get fired - he will get therapy.\" On Feb. 19, the student's parents \"were very clear, they did not want to lose his job over this\" and \"felt strongly the positives outweighed the negatives + that should be given a chance by to rebuild relationships and confidence,\" according to the documents. On March 7 Shellman resigned, effective April 28. He was told to immediately vacate his office, continue counseling and not consume alcoholic beverages with any students anywhere. Shellman wrote on March 20 \"to express sincere regret for the pain this incident has caused,\" and take full responsibility for my actions.\" He added am in counseling and to date have not had a drink in 38 days.\" Behind closed doors The first incident with a female student centers around actions that occurred in June 2007 during the Summer Workshop on Teaching about Terrorism conference led by Shellman. One night during the conference, after getting sandwiches with a colleague, Shellman went to the student's room and tried to get into bed with her. 2/22/25, 10:28 professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) | News | redandblack.com 3/5 It was not unusual for them to be alone, according to documents. In his statement, Shellman said the two were \"having a deep conversation about her personal life and family. The narrative turned melancholy quickly and she began crying ... She ended up getting into bed and went over and put my arms around her to comfort her. It got awkward.\" According to the student \"he was drunk. Large guy already in bed wanted to sleep in her bed wanted to cuddle she kept moving away to other bed he move to her bed she moved finally he left.\" As he was leaving he told her know you are cool and this wont be uncomfortable tomorrow,\" the documents say. After the incident, the student said she \"decided to keep distance; keep other students w/ them to be buffer.\" Another night when he had been drinking, he knocked on the door of the room the girl was staying in and \"they did not let him in.\" After the incident in the hotel room, Shellman \"kept telling (redacted) he would get her a $5,000 scholarship while at (redacted).\" (Redacted) had only done research with Shellman, and \"felt she could not pull out of situation ... felt 'indebted' to ... would be her recommendation for grad school.\" Under pressure Shellman was \"boisterous and loud\" at summer conferences and \"basically - stud. had to take care of him\" the documents read. He put pressure on female students to drink and would buy them beer, according to documents. One female student would put the beers other places or empty them so Shellman would stop asking why she wasn't drinking. Shellman showed, \"a little too much interest\" when drinking, and would kiss one particular female student on the forehead and tickle her. He also would ask about personal subjects such as boyfriends. Mia Bloom, a professor and colleague of Shellman's, said when he is drunk he \"would get physically 'chummy' is touchy feely - gets angry if want to leave or not drunk,\" she told Shewmaker in the documents. 2/22/25, 10:28 professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) | News | redandblack.com 4/5 She said she \"saw Steve get undergrads under 21 get drunk - both downtown and @ home - wife normally not around.\" Bloom was uncomfortable with Shellman's relationship with undergrads because \"buying booze for them illegal.\" She said he did this at summer conferences and while at the University. Documents state Shellman was good in the classroom and brought in lots of money to the University. \"With success of bringing in grants, got sense of entitlement and 'power' conduct,\" Bloom told Shewmaker in the documents. His behavior worsened during the last year as a result. His confidence was noticed during the probe. According to Bloom, he told others following his interview at the Office of Legal Affairs on Feb. 15 that he believed nothing would happen to him not take it seriously; nothing going to happen to me.\" 2/22/25, 10:28 professor quits: Documents detail 'alcohol problem' (w/documents) | News | redandblack.com 5/5", "7722_102.pdf": "semester of shame The Red And Black Archives Apr 2, 2008 Here's a running package to the various documents, stories, audio and video files involving professors, faculty and sexual harassment at the University of Georgia: Office of Legal Affairs documents involving College of Education professor William N. Bender. Want to read more? Check out the main story on the Bender case. Read the administration's response. Read the Bender profile. Faculty response. Office of Legal Affairs documents involving Department of English associate professor Charles C. Doyle. Want to read more? Check out the main story on the Doyle case. Read about his hiatus. Office of Legal Affairs documents involving former Department of Anthropology professor Benjamin G. Blount. Want to read more? Read the main story on the Blount case. Blount resigns from UTSA. Office of Legal Affairs documents involving assistant professor Stephen M. Shellman. Want to read more? Read the main story on the Shellman case. 2/22/25, 10:28 semester of shame | News | redandblack.com 1/2 What the University will do about his grant money. Office of Legal Affairs documents involving genetics and epidemiology assistant professor Mark Jensen. Want to read more? Read the main story on the Jensen case. Here is a story on the case of former Georgia women's golf coach Todd McCorkle. Audio from administrators about sexual harassment at UGA. Video from administrators about sexual harassment at UGA. University to hire ombudspersons to deal with sexual harassment issues. Letter from President Michael Adams. Legal Affairs begins training. New hire at Equal Opportunity Office. Ombudsman role clarified. Three ombudspersons hired by University. Reaction to hire of ombudspersons. Overview on UGA's response. Want to sign the petition to condemn sexual harassment at ? Click here. 2/22/25, 10:28 semester of shame | News | redandblack.com 2/2"} |
8,972 | Charles Hadlock | Michigan State University | [
"8972_101.pdf",
"8972_102.pdf",
"8972_103.pdf",
"8972_104.pdf",
"8972_105.pdf"
] | {"8972_101.pdf": "The Pitt News \u2022 March 3, 2023 \u2022 professor-engaged-in-non-consensual-sexual-contact-at-previous-michigan-state-job/ Report finds Pitt business professor engaged in \u2018non-consensual sexual contact\u2019 at previous Michigan State job By Rebecca Johnson and Alexandra Ross According to a report made public earlier this year, a professor in Pitt\u2019s Katz School of Business \u201cengaged in non-consensual sexual contact\u201d with multiple people at his previous job at Michigan State University. While at an gala with students and professors in April 2022, then-business school associate dean Charles Hadlock non-consensually touched two individuals and sexually harassed one of them, according to an investigation. In July, Hadlock started working as a professor and the Terrence Laughlin Chair in Finance at Pitt\u2019s business school. At MSU, the circumstances surrounding this incident erupted into a massive scandal involving top university officials, but it is unclear if Hadlock\u2019s conduct at his last job will result in any action at Pitt. Following an unrelated alleged sexual assault inside the Cathedral of Learning last semester, students have pressed the University to take more action to prevent sexual misconduct on campus Pitt spokesperson said in light of the incident \u2014 which became public in January 2023 through a Michigan Freedom of Information Act request from Michigan news outlets \u2014 Pitt\u2019s Office of Compliance, Investigation and Ethics \u201cis reviewing this hiring process.\u201d Once this review is complete, the spokesperson said the University will determine the \u201cappropriate next steps.\u201d \u201cWhile we cannot share details of the review underway, we want to reiterate that the safety, security and well-being of our students and employees remains a top priority for our university,\u201d the spokesperson said. \u201cWe remain committed to supporting an environment free from sexual misconduct, harassment and discrimination, and this work is led by our Office for Equity, Diversity and Inclusion.\u201d The spokesperson for the University did not answer questions about potential actions Pitt could take as a result of this review, including any consequences Hadlock will face from the University. The spokesperson said there is no specific deadline for the review. The focus will rather be on \u201cconducting a full and thorough review.\u201d The spokesperson also didn\u2019t respond to questions about the extent of interaction Hadlock has with students in the classroom or at University-sponsored events. Pitt declined to give the name of the person speaking on behalf of the University. Image via Pittwire Katz Graduate School of Business. Hadlock teaches the undergraduate course 1355 \u201cValuation\u201d this semester, according to course directory records in PeopleSoft. Hadlock did not respond to multiple requests via email asking him for comment regarding the April incident or his decision to come to Pitt. He also could not be reached by phone. According to an investigation report from MSU\u2019s Resolution Office, a unit of the school\u2019s Office of Civil Rights and Title Education and Compliance, Hadlock \u201cappeared intoxicated\u201d at a \u201cGatsby Gala\u201d on April 22. He also \u201c[engaged] in sexualized dancing\u201d \u2014 which was \u201cunwanted\u201d \u2014 with at least two individuals. The report \u2014 which The State News, MSU\u2019s student newspaper, shared with The Pitt News \u2014 referenced nine pieces of evidence in addition to witness statements, including public incident reports and a 12-second video. The investigation found that Hadlock violated MSU\u2019s policy on relationship violence, sexual misconduct and Title IX. In a request for early retirement leave from his Michigan State position on May 10, Hadlock cited a need to \u201ctend to family health situations and lecture/consult without the pressures of a tenured faculty position,\u201d according to investigative records obtained by Crain\u2019s Detroit. Crain\u2019s also reported that Sanjay Gupta, then-business school dean at MSU, told university officials that Hadlock requested early retirement in order to take a job at another university. Hadlock officially resigned from on June 30. Ann Austin, interim associate provost and associate vice president for faculty and academic staff affairs at MSU, told Hadlock in a Jan. 6 letter that he isn\u2019t allowed to work at in the future. \u201cGiven this determination and our commitment to ensuring a safe environment, we have determined that you will not be permitted to be hired by in the future in any capacity (paid or unpaid),\u201d Austin said to Hadlock in the letter. According to Crain\u2019s Detroit, the April incident ultimately gave rise to the resignation of Gupta and former President Samuel Stanley Jr. The university asked Gupta to resign in August 2022 for his failure to report Hadlock\u2019s behavior at the gala, and the controversy surrounding Gupta\u2019s resignation led to Stanley\u2019s resignation. Gupta, who didn\u2019t attend the gala, said he didn\u2019t report the incident because other deans who told him about it said they would report it. Gupta filed a lawsuit on Feb. 24 against top officials for allegedly defaming him in a plot to keep him from being named university president, according to The State News.", "8972_102.pdf": "Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad\u2019s Ousted Dean 16, 2023 | 3,639 Michigan State Broad College of Business Dean Sanjay Gupta unexpectedly stepped down in August 2022, just two years into his second term, over what Michigan media described as \u201can alleged failure to report an allegation of sexual misconduct that was made against one of his subordinates\u201d; Gupta later claimed to have been forced out. In February he sued the school, and a judge this week ruled the lawsuit can go forward. Michigan State photo The story of the dramatic ouster of Michigan State University\u2019s business school dean has taken another turn, this time in the former dean\u2019s favor. Sanjay Gupta, who stepped down in late summer 2022 for what was initially reported as a failure to properly report a professor\u2019s inappropriate behavior ( deans-resignation-evokes-larry-nassar-scandal/?pq- category=business-school-news), is suing school officials, saying his due process rights were violated and his character defamed. The school had asked a U.S. district court judge to dismiss the lawsuit, but on Wednesday (June 14) the judge ruled that Gupta\u2019s lawsuit can proceed. \ue008 \ue105 2/22/25, 10:29 Poets&Quants | Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad's Ousted Dean 1/5 Interim Michigan State University President Teresa Woodruff In the suit, Gupta claims that he wasn\u2019t forced to resign over the clumsy handling of a scandal involving sexual misconduct by a professor at an end-of-year, off-campus student party, as the school had claimed. Instead, he says, he was the victim of a power struggle ( business-dean-i-was-pushed-out-in-a-power-struggle/), forced out by then-Provost Teresa Woodruff after he expressed interest in becoming Michigan State\u2019s president \u2014 the job she wanted and currently holds on an interim basis Gupta joined Michigan State as an accounting and information systems professor in 2007 after 17 years as a professor at Arizona State\u2019s W.P. Carey School of Business. He became interim dean at the Broad College in 2014, then ascended to the deanship in July of the next year. He was appointed to a second five-year term in 2020. That same year, Teresa Woodruff came to as provost after serving as dean of the graduate school and associate provost for graduate education at Northwestern University, where she had spent 25 years as a professor and administrator. The cascade of events leading to the end of Gupta\u2019s deanship began in April 2022, according to a timeline in an independent review ( succession-episode-the-ignominy-of-a-b-school-deans-ouster/?pq- category=business-school-news) commissioned by the university\u2019s Board of Trustees. At an off-campus \u201cGatsby Gala\u201d for students on April 22, then-Associate Dean Charles Hadlock became intoxicated and danced in a sexually suggestive manner with female students, behavior that was documented in a brief video taken by another person at the party. Hadlock is now a chaired finance professor at the University of Pittsburgh\u2019s Katz Graduate School of Business. Over the course of four days after the gala, Hadlock\u2019s behavior was reported to the school\u2019s Office of Institutional Equity by students and faculty members who heard about it from students. Sometime between 2/22/25, 10:29 Poets&Quants | Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad's Ousted Dean 2/5 April 26 and April 29, a Broad administrator informed Gupta about Hadlock\u2019s actions; around the same time, Gupta heard about the incident from a second administrator. Meanwhile, more reports about the incident continued to come in to OIE. On May 2, Hadlock met with Gupta and admitted to the offense, saying he \u201cdrank too much\u201d and was \u201cvery sorry.\u201d The next day, Hadlock announced his resignation, effective June 30, 2022. Michigan State, one-time employer of the notorious Larry Nassar ( deans-resignation-evokes-larry-nassar-scandal/?pq- category=business-school-news), has a fraught history with sexual misconduct. The university\u2019s mandatory reporting policy requires that, unless identified as a confidential source, all university employees must report sexual harassment, sexual violence, sexual misconduct, stalking, and relationship violence incidents if they observe it themselves or learn about it in their professional capacity, if it involves a member of the university community, if it occurred at a university-sponsored event or on university property. However, Hadlock\u2019s resignation did not end the matter. Woodruff, who as provost had the power to fire and hire deans, told investigators that she gave five reasons for asking for Gupta\u2019s resignation: his alleged violation of the policy requiring employees to report relationship violence and sexual misconduct; his own failure to investigate an instance of alleged sexual misconduct of a business school leader; that his delay in reporting caused a two-month delay in an Office of Institutional Equity investigation; his failure to notify Faculty and Academic Staff Affairs of the misconduct and the accused leader\u2019s request to retire; and failure to prevent an Outside Work for Pay Policy violation for the accused leader. Gupta resigned as dean in August. In November 2022, when President Samuel Stanley left the school, Woodruff was named interim president. Gupta \u2014 who had completed university-mandated training on sexual harassment in 2021 \u2014 says he complied with all university rules and was pressured to step down. Amid outcry from students and faculty, the university\u2019s Board of Trustees commissioned the independent review of Woodruff\u2019s decision to dismiss Gupta. The 104-page report by Los Angeles-based firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, including interviews with 11 individuals and a review of more than 9,300 documents, was released publicly in late March 2023. It found that Woodruff\u2019s 2/22/25, 10:29 Poets&Quants | Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad's Ousted Dean 3/5 justification for removing Gupta was severely flawed, and that among her five reasons for getting rid of the dean, only one allegation was valid: his initial failure to report Hadlock\u2019s behavior. 7 Gupta\u2019s lawsuit states that \u201cThe facts establish that Gupta did not violate any mandatory reporting policy, promptly acted to protect students and complied with published Title policies \u2026 and acted with integrity, transparency and professionalism at all times as Dean of the Eli Broad College of Business.\u201d All told, Gupta is accusing Woodruff and six other university leaders \u2014 Interim Provost Thomas Jeitschko, Title Coordinator Nicole Schmidtke, Senior Title investigator Allison Towe, interim Associate Provost Ann Austin, former university President Stanley, and Emily Guerrant, vice president of communications \u2014 of playing a role in a scheme to oust him. That scheme took shape in June 2022, Gupta alleges in his lawsuit, when Woodruff discovered during a performance review that Gupta aspired to the university presidency, a job he claims she wanted. He says she drummed up a reason to demand his resignation two months later and then publicly promoted a false narrative for pushing him out, with the help of the others named in the suit. \u201cDefendants \u2026 (orchestrated) the process behind the scenes in an effort for Woodruff to smear and stigmatize Gupta\u2019s good name and thereby eliminate her competitor,\u201d the lawsuit says. The amended suit adds the eight university trustees as defendants. Michigan State officials named in Gupta\u2019s lawsuit asked U.S. Western District Court judge Paul Maloney to dismiss what they called \u201ca desperate, last-ditch plea\u201d to be reinstated as Broad\u2019s dean, but this week, Maloney agreed that Gupta\u2019s lawsuit could go forward. Gupta is requesting a trial by jury and asking the court to reinstate him as dean; he also seeks an undisclosed amount in damages and an acknowledgement that his due process rights were violated Even as he has been forced out of the dean\u2019s office, Gupta has remained a professor at the school. His faculty page is still live at the website ( \u2014 and his LinkedIn profile still describes him as the business school\u2019s dean. 2/22/25, 10:29 Poets&Quants | Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad's Ousted Dean 4/5 Previous Article: 5 Biggest Surprises In Online Programs ( biggest-surprises-in-online-mba- programs/?pq-category=online- mba&pq-category-2=online-mba- news&pq-category-3=students) Next Article: Spotlight On U.S. MiMs: The Master Of Science In Management At Georgetown McDonough School Of Business ( on-u-s-mims-the-master-of- science-in-management-at- georgetown-mcdonough-school-of- business/) His hopes for reinstatement may be dwindling with time: The university has been conducting a search for his replacement since last fall, and reports say school officials hope to conclude it by July ( succession-episode-the-ignominy-of-a-b-school-deans-ouster/) or ( deans-resignation-evokes-larry-nassar-scandal (HTTPS://POETSANDQUANTS.COM/TAG/TERESA-WOODRUFF/) \ue042 2/22/25, 10:29 Poets&Quants | Another Twist In The Saga Of Michigan State Broad's Ousted Dean 5/5", "8972_103.pdf": "( Alex Walters Fourth Place Michigan State University $1,000 Scholarship ( ing-individual-team left in the dark on his misconduct, then it happened again By Alex Walters When Anthony Williams Jr. resigned from his Michigan State University deanship in February over an in- cident of sexual misconduct, it wasn\u2019t the first time he faced accusations. It was just the first time they stuck. Fourth Place Writing \u2013 Investigative Reporting \u2013 Individual/Team Home ( Contact (/contact/) \uf203 ( 116560165046139/) \uf202 ( Two years ago, while in his previous role as Grand Valley State University\u2019s Director of Student Conduct and Conflict Resolution, Williams was being investigated by the university\u2019s Title office for allegedly sexually assaulting a student. But that investigation never finished, because Williams resigned and accepted the job as MSU\u2019s dean of students before it could. In his new role, informally known as the \u201cchief conduct officer,\u201d he would over- see student behavior and sit on the committee advising on Title IX. When he made the move had a policy of closing investigations into people who left the univer- sity. MSU\u2019s background checks only cover Title cases that reach a final resolution. That allowed Williams to get the new job without a chance that the investigation would be completed and without knowing it had ever been opened. The circumstances \u2013 a university employee known to have engaged in misconduct moving from one place to another, sheltering the employee from consequences and the institutions from public scrutiny \u2013 is common. It even has a name: pass the harasser. In some cases \u2013 like Williams\u2019, where records show he first applied to work at before the victim contacted GVSU\u2019s Title office \u2013 moving around appears to be a lucky chance to avert consequences. But for others, moving around can be a calculated tactic. \u201cWe advise people when there\u2019s an allegation to get out and start looking for a new school before there is a finding,\u201d Joshua Engel, a lawyer who represents faculty members and students accused of harass- ment, told The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2019. The loophole In the years since Williams\u2019 exit changed their policies to encourage the Title office to continue investigations even if the subject leaves the university. That brings in line with MSU, which also attempts to continue investigations regardless of resignation. \u201cWe don\u2019t want to incentivize resignation as a motive for getting rid of a Title investigation deputy spokesperson Dan Olsen said. But even with complete investigations, the pass-the-harasser problem remains, because the results aren\u2019t proactively shared with the accused\u2019s next employer. Olsen said can\u2019t share that information in part because of legal and privacy concerns, but mostly because simply doesn\u2019t keep track of where people go after leaving the university spokesperson would not say if the university has a method of sharing findings and do add the finalized investigations to the employee\u2019s personnel file, which can be ac- cessed by their new institution though public records requests. That process recently played out in the case of former professor and associate business dean Charles Hadlock, who resigned in summer 2022 while under investigation for sexually harassing and as- saulting students at an event. Hadlock took a new job at the University of Pittsburgh before the investigation concluded. When it did, months into his work at Pitt, he was found to have violated the university\u2019s Title and Relationship Violence and Sexual Misconduct policies followed its policy, adding the results to his file but not proactively notifying Pitt of what it had found. So, Pitt was only made aware of Hadlock\u2019s conduct through reports from Michigan news outlets in January, which were primarily writing about Hadlock because of his case\u2019s connection to the controver- sial resignation of former business dean Sanjay Gupta. In April, Pitt spokesperson Nick France told The State News that after the news reports surfaced, Pitt be- gan reviewing \u201cthe circumstances surrounding (Hadlock\u2019s) recruitment and ultimate hire by the univer- sity.\u201d Regardless, he remains employed at Pitt today. Williams misconduct The case file for Williams Title incident doesn\u2019t say much. April 27th, 2021: the Title office opens an investigation into Williams, with the victim reporting \u201cmulti- ple inappropriate statements and actions\u201d that amounted to sexual assault. July 16th, 2021: the case is closed. But, according to two people with intimate knowledge of the matter, Williams\u2019 case is the one explored in a 2022 independent investigation of GVSU\u2019s Title office. The circumstances and dates of each event in that case also match those of Williams\u2019. According to that report \u2013 which was conducted by global law firm Husch Blackwell \u2013 the threat of Williams resigning during the investigation to avoid consequences was a point of much discussion by investigators. He had applied to be MSU\u2019s dean of students just before the victim reported abuse, and had made it through multiple rounds of interviews as the investigators worked on his case, according to the file documenting the search process. In meetings throughout the investigatory process, they debated how they could finish before Williams left, or if that would make any difference in his employment, according to Husch Blackwell\u2019s report. In the end, the investigation reached a finalized report, the second to last step in GVSU\u2019s Title process did not release the contents of that report in response to a records request by The State News. The next step would be a hearing where Williams, the victim and witnesses would be questioned by a panel charged with making a final judgment and potentially issuing discipline. But Williams received an offer from and resigned before that could happen, so his case was closed. Williams at His new role \u2013 earning him a salary of $135,000, which is $60,000 more than his job \u2013 was de- scribed in application materials as the university\u2019s \u201cchief conduct officer,\u201d charged with ensuring \u201ca transformative and restorative approach to accountability.\u201d Outside of his day-to-day work ensuring students behaved with integrity, he would serve on the committee overseeing Title IX. About a year into the job, in November 2022, Williams attended a National Association of Student Personnel Administrators\u2019 conference in Chicago. There, a fellow delegate reported he made unwanted advances in a hotel bar before being removed by security, which prompted his resignation from MSU. The resignation agreement included three months of transitional pay \u2013 which he would not have been entitled to had he been terminated \u2013 and a condition of confidentiality. In an email to staff explaining his departure, Williams said he was a finalist in a closed search at another institution. In addition to the privacy provided by the resignation agreement, the part of his personnel file detailing the incident in Chicago was initially exempted from disclosure. It was eventually released after a Freedom of Information Act appeal from The State News, making the reason for his resignation available to requesters or institutions looking to hire Williams going forward. \u201cThe public\u2019s interest in disclosure outweighs any privacy interest by the employee,\u201d MSU\u2019s response, authored by Interim President Teresa Woodruff, said. It\u2019s unclear where or if Williams is currently employed. He did not return calls seeking comment. He has also deleted his social media profiles. Fallout at Back at GVSU, Theresa Rowland, the lead investigator on Williams\u2019 case, had been in constant conflict with her boss, Vice President for Inclusion & Equity Jesse Bernal, over how to handle Williams\u2019 case. Many of their disagreements centered around Bernal repeatedly asking Rowland to have an outside in- vestigator conduct the investigation into Williams, according to Husch Blackwell\u2019s report. When asked to explain his insistence by Husch Blackwell\u2019s investigators, Bernal said that he thought Rowland was fully capable of properly investigating the case, but worried about accusations of bias, as the Title office had \u201clongstanding tensions\u201d with Williams and his student conduct department. Bernal had heard those concerns from Williams himself, who called Bernal the day he found out about the investigation to question Rowland\u2019s motives, according to Husch Blackwell\u2019s report. So Rowland \u2013 who saw the communication between Bernal and Williams as improper interference into her case \u2013 pushed back on Bernal\u2019s request to turn the case over to an outside investigator. She argued it was too late, as she had already met with the victim and began the investigation. Eventually, Bernal amended his demand, asking that she have an outside investigator review her work after she was done. But Rowland was worried about Williams\u2019 looming resignation, and thought the review would slow the investigation. So, she filed her final report without any review, against Bernal\u2019s instructions. Despite her time-saving maneuver, Williams left before that report could be taken to a hearing month later, Rowland was placed on an indefinite suspension. She resigned shortly after, and entered into a non-disclosure agreement with GVSU. Outraged by the confusion and secrecy surrounding Rowland\u2019s exit, nearly every staffer in the Title of- fice resigned. In their letters of resignation, they alleged toxic leadership and broad \u201cevisceration of the Title office by (Bernal),\u201d according to copies obtained by The State News. Kathleen Blumreich, one of the last to resign, wrote that \u201cthe Title Office is now empty \u2026 the univer- sity has lost dedicated individuals whose expertise, ethical conduct, and professionalism made (it) a model for other institutions of higher education.\u201d The lack of staff and inconsistent communication surrounding Rowland\u2019s departure left un- equipped to investigate cases and caused it to be technically out of compliance with the federal Title statute from Aug. 19, 2021, to Sept. 6, 2021, Husch Blackwell found. GVSU\u2019s faculty senate formed a task force to examine the issue, and by October 2021, GVSU\u2019s faculty and staff were informed that the president had retained Husch Blackwell to investigate the matter and create the report which details the investigative process behind Williams\u2019 case. After the report\u2019s release, Bernal, who remains GVSU\u2019s top Title administrator, agreed to a series of re- forms, including policy revisions to clearly define conflicts of interest and regular outside reviews of the Title office. The first of those reviews occurred in Winter 2023. \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2013 This article, in its original form, can be found here 2018-2019 ( 2017-2018 ( 2016-2017 ( 2015-2016 (/competitions/2015-16/) 2014-2015 (/competitions/2014-15/) 2013-2014 (/competitions/2013-14/) 2012-2013 (/competitions/2012-13/) 2011-2012 (/competitions/2011-12/) 2010-2011 (/competitions/2010-11/) View Story ( duct-then-it-happened-again) 2009-2010 (/competitions/2009-10/) 2008-2009 (/competitions/2008-09/) Writing (/competitions/writing/2008-09/) Photojournalism (/competitions/photojournalism/2008-09/) Broadcast News (/competitions/broadcast-news/2008-09/) Multimedia (/competitions/multimedia/2008-09/) Intercollegiate (/competitions/intercollegiate/2008-09) 2007-2008 (/competitions/2007-08/) 2006-2007 (/competitions/2006-07/) 2005-2006 (/competitions/2005-06 2024-25 Hearst Multimedia Narrative Video Storytelling Competition Winners Announced ( ners-announced/) 2024-25 Hearst Feature Writing Competition Winners Announced ( hearst-feature-writing-competition-winners-announced/) 2024-25 Hearst Photojournalism News & Features Competition Winners Announced ( announced/) 2024-25 Hearst Television Features Competition Winners Announced ( hearst-television-features-competition-winners-announced/) 2024 Hearst National Championship Winners Announced ( tional-championship-winners-announced/) Home ( Competition Calendar ( Guidelines ( Monthly Competition Winners ( awards-competitions/) National Championship Winners ( championships/) News ( About ( Contact ( Alumni ( Site Map (/sitemap/) | Credits (/site-credits/) 90 New Montgomery Street, Suite 1212, San Francisco 94105-4504 \u2022 Phone: (415) 908-4565 or (800) 841-7048 ext. 4565 \u00a92016 The Hearst Journalism Awards Program. All rights reserved. \uf415 ( \uf415 ( \uf415 ( \uf415 ( \uf415 ( \uf415\uf415\uf415\uf415\uf415", "8972_104.pdf": "The Pitt News \u2022 August 30, 2023 \u2022 engaged-non-consensual-sexual-contact-at-previous-michigan-state-job-university-review-finds-pitt- was-unaware-of-the-incident-during-recruitment-hiring/ Business professor engaged in \u2018non- consensual sexual contact\u2019 at previous Michigan State job, University review finds Pitt was unaware of the incident during recruitment, hiring By Betul Tuncer, Editor-in-Chief Pitt reviewed circumstances surrounding the recruitment and hiring of business professor Charles Hadlock, following a report made public by Michigan State University which found that Hadlock had engaged in sexual misconduct while employed at MSU. According to a statement made by Katz School of Business Dean Gene Anderson, the review has determined that no one at Pitt was aware or informed of the professor\u2019s misconduct until the report was made public. In January of this year released a public report stating that Hadlock, the school\u2019s former business school associate dean for faculty and doctoral programs, had \u201cengaged in non-consensual sexual contact\u201d at a gala event while he was employed by in April 2022. Hadlock\u2019s previous employer began investigating the allegations in July of that same year and released its findings to the public in January. According to Anderson, Hadlock received a \u201cverbal offer\u201d from Pitt prior to the incident at the gala event, and he started at Pitt prior to July 2022 when began its investigation. \u201cIn addition, none of Professor Hadlock\u2019s previous employers reported any other allegations or findings of inappropriate behavior by Professor Hadlock. Importantly, there have been no allegations of inappropriate behavior involving Professor Hadlock at the University of Pittsburgh,\u201d Anderson said in a statement sent out to the business school. Pitt\u2019s review of Hadlock\u2019s recruitment and hiring involved interviewing dozens of faculty members \u2014 including Hadlock \u2014 and reviewing emails and documents associated with his hiring, according to Anderson. The University also reviewed documents made available through the Freedom of Information Act request directed at and other documents released by MSU\u2019s Board of Trustees. Image via Pittwire Katz Graduate School of Business. According to Anderson, Hadlock has taken responsibility for his misconduct while at and is \u201cdeeply remorseful for his behavior and the harmful consequences that his actions have had on the Pitt Business community and Pitt.\u201d Anderson explained that Hadlock\u2019s growth and commitment to \u201cadhering to the highest standards of ethics\u201d is a \u201clong road\u201d \u2014 the first steps of which include Hadlock\u2019s voluntary resignation from his position as the Terrence Laughlin Chair in Finance and his participation in a mandatory training on sexual harassment, sexual misconduct and gender-sensitive language. Hadlock has also agreed to refrain from attending university events where alcohol is served and engaging closely with a professional mentor. \u201cIt should be evident to everyone that Professor Hadlock faces a challenging and protracted process of rebuilding trust if he is to be a credible and valued member of our faculty,\u201d Anderson noted. \u201cHe must demonstrate through actions, rather than words, that he has fundamentally changed and is genuinely endeavoring to redress the harm that he has caused.\u201d At the end of his statement, Anderson added that Pitt Business is dedicated to ensuring the safety of everyone and fostering an environment that is free of misconduct and harassment. \u201cWhile we never wish for such circumstances to arise, they offer an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to the pursuit of academic excellence in a community that is welcoming to all. Misconduct and harassment of any kind undermine the nature of an academic institution like ours, which thrives on a culture of mutual respect, support, and open-minded inquiry,\u201d Anderson said. \u201cWe each bear the responsibility of nurturing a safe and welcoming academic environment at Pitt Business.\u201d", "8972_105.pdf": "56 1 25, 2023 Friday, August 25, 2023 Business dean reports on hiring of professor who was facing investigation By In an unusual move, the dean of the Katz Graduate School of Business and College of Business Administration has sent a message to all faculty and staff concerning the hiring of a faculty member last year who was being investigated by his former employer for sexual harassment. Charles Hadlock came to Pitt from Michigan State University in July 2022 as the Terrence Laughlin Chair in Finance. In January 2023, Pitt officials became aware of an investigation by that found Hadlock violated the school's policies on relationship violence, sexual misconduct and Title while \u201cheavily intoxicated\u201d at an annual business gala in April 2022 attended by students and professors. Two people reported being subject to unwelcome sexual contact by Hadlock, who was then business school associate dean, during the gala. Pitt\u2019s Business Dean Gene Anderson said in his message to faculty and staff that after Pitt learned of Michigan State\u2019s investigation \u201ca comprehensive review of the circumstances surrounding the recruitment and hiring of Professor Hadlock\u201d was launched. The Office of Compliance, Investigations, and Ethics interviewed more than a dozen faculty members, including Hadlock, and reviewed email correspondence, documents associated with Hadlock\u2019s recruitment and hire, documents received in response to a Freedom of Information Act request directed at Michigan State , and other related documents released by MSU\u2019s Board of Trustees. Additionally, the University contacted each of 2/22/25, 10:30 Business dean reports on hiring of professor who was facing investigation | University Times | University of Pittsburgh 1/3 Hadlock\u2019s previous employers. Anderson, who started at Pitt after Hadlock was hired, said the complete report would not be released, because of privacy laws and University policy, but he said the investigation found that no one at Pitt was aware of the allegations against Hadlock until reports became public in January. \u201cIt\u2019s also noteworthy that Professor Hadlock received a verbal offer from Pitt prior to the incident at the gala event at MSU, and he joined Pitt before began its investigation,\u201d Anderson\u2019s message said. \u201cIn addition, none of Professor Hadlock\u2019s previous employers reported any other allegations or findings of inappropriate behavior by Professor Hadlock. Importantly, there have been no allegations of inappropriate behavior involving Professor Hadlock at the University of Pittsburgh. \u201cProfessor Hadlock has taken responsibility for his misconduct at the gala event,\u201d the dean\u2019s message continued. \u201cHe is deeply remorseful for his behavior and the harmful consequences that his actions have had on the Pitt Business community and Pitt. He has extended a formal apology to me, recognizing the harm he has caused and pledging to reflect upon his actions as a catalyst for personal growth and positive transformation. His commitment extends to adhering to the highest standards of ethics and behavior in the future.\u201d In addition, Hadlock has voluntarily resigned from the Terrence Laughlin Chair in Finance and will participate in mandatory training pertaining to sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, gender-sensitive language, and the appropriate use of pronouns. He also has consented to additional measures, including refraining from attending University events where alcohol is served and engaging closely with a professional mentor, among other actions. Anderson ended his message by reaffirming \u201cour commitment to the pursuit of academic excellence in a community that is welcoming to all. Misconduct and harassment of any kind undermine the nature of an academic institution like ours, which thrives on a culture of mutual respect, support, and open-minded inquiry. We each bear the responsibility of nurturing a safe and welcoming academic environment at Pitt Business.\u201d At Michigan State, the controversy eventually led to the forced resignation of then-business dean Sanjay Gupta, partly because of his failure to report Hadlock\u2019s behavior under the university's guidelines. The report said two associate deans told Gupta about the incident at the gala, although Gupta was not at the event. Susan Jones is editor of the University Times. Reach her at [email protected] or 724-244- 4042. Have a story idea or news to share? Share it with the University Times. 2/22/25, 10:30 Business dean reports on hiring of professor who was facing investigation | University Times | University of Pittsburgh 2/3 Follow the University Times on Twitter and Facebook. University of Pittsburgh Craig Hall, fourth floor 200 S. Craig St. Pittsburgh 15260 412-648-4294 [email protected] Archive Volume 55-50 Volumes 49\u201327 Email Subscription Name Email Revised 02/17/25 Copyright 2025 Site by University Communications Send feedback about this site 2/22/25, 10:30 Business dean reports on hiring of professor who was facing investigation | University Times | University of Pittsburgh 3/3"} |
8,660 | Andrew Watkins | Michigan State University | [
"8660_101.pdf"
] | {"8660_101.pdf": "Lee Voss | Published: November 17, 2021 Stearns County Jail photo Watkins man accused of sexually assaulting a former classmate has been found mentally incompetent to face the charge. The alleged assault happened in August while the woman was riding in a vehicle with 22-year-old Fernando Andrews. The woman said she went to hang out with Andrews, who was a former classmate, but when they started driving, he began trying to hold her hands and kiss her. Court records show Andrews pulled the car over on a dirt road in South Haven, pulled her shirt down, bit her bare breast, and put his hand down her pants. Court records allege he tried to pull the woman toward him but she pulled away and faced the window. Andrews then allegedly urinated on her. The victim was able to escape and run to a house for help when Andrews parked and again tried to sexually assault her woman cared for the victim until police arrived and took her to the hospital for a sexual assault examination. Enter mobile number Get our free mobile app Stop Information Ov 84 The Value The Value 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 1/76 An Advanced Research Tool The results of the mental competency examination were returned last week and a judge made the ruling at a hearing in Stearns County District Court Wednesday. Andrews is charged with 1st-degree criminal sexual conduct by force or coercion. The criminal case against him is on hold unless his mental competency can be restored. LOOK: 50 2020 Mario Tama // Getty Images year unlike any other, both good and bad... To reflect on the utter transcendence of 2020, Stacker compiled 50 photos of American life this year. From hallowed moments to images of perseverance and celebration, keep reading to see just some of all that\u2019s happened so far this year. By: Elizabeth Ciano From: 50 photos of American life in 2020 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 2/76 Bryan Steffy // Getty Images Jan. 1: New Year\u2019s Eve celebrations in Las Vegas Fireworks illuminate the skyline over the Las Vegas Strip during \"America's Party 2020,\" an eight-minute pyrotechnics show by Fireworks from Grucci. About 400,000 visitors gathered to watch more than 80,000 fireworks shoot from the rooftops of seven hotel-casinos to welcome the new year. Barbara Alper // Getty Images Jan. 18: Fourth Annual Women\u2019s March The Fourth Annual Women's March gathers at Columbus Circle in New York City. Marches were scheduled in more than 180 cities for the annual event. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 3/76 Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for The Recording Academy Jan. 26: Grammy Awards Billie Eilish performs onstage during the 62nd Annual Grammy Awards at Staples Center in Los Angeles. David McNew // Getty Images Jan. 28: Kobe Bryant memorial man places a hat at a makeshift memorial near the Staples Center in Los Angeles in memory of former great Kobe Bryant who, along with his 13-year-old daughter Gianna and seven others, died Jan. 26 in a helicopter crash in 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 4/76 Calabasas, California. The plane was en route to Bryant\u2019s Mamba Sports Academy in Thousand Oaks, where he was going to coach Gianna in a tournament game. Kevin C. Cox // Getty Images Feb. 2: Super Bowl Kansas City Chiefs Frank Clark, #55, and Patrick Mahomes, #15, celebrate after defeating the San Francisco 49ers by 31-20 in Super Bowl at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami. You may also like: Scientific breakthroughs from the year you were born 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 5/76 Drew Angerer // Getty Images Feb. 6: President Trump acquitted President Donald Trump holds a copy of the Washington Post as he speaks in the East Room of the White House one day after the U.S. Senate acquitted on two articles of impeachment. After five months of congressional hearings and investigations about President Trump\u2019s dealings with Ukraine, the Senate formally acquitted the president of charges that he abused his power and obstructed Congress. Barry Lewis/In Pictures via Getty Images Feb. 25: Mardi Gras in New Orleans Partying on Bourbon Street during the evening of Mardi Gras on Feb. 25 in New Orleans. Mardi Gras is the biggest celebration the city of New Orleans hosts every year. The magnificent, costumed, beaded, and feathered party is laced with tradition and having a good time. Celebrations are concentrated for about two weeks before and culminate on Fat Tuesday (the day before Ash Wednesday and Lent). 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 6/76 Win McNamee // Getty Images Feb. 25: Democratic primary debates Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and Tom Steyer speak after the Democratic presidential primary debate at the Charleston Gaillard Center in Charleston, South Carolina. Seven candidates qualified for the debate, hosted by News and Congressional Black Caucus Institute, ahead of South Carolina\u2019s primary four days following. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 7/76 Joe Raedle // Getty Images March 1: Selma\u2019s Bloody Sunday Anniversary Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) speaks to the crowd at the Edmund Pettus Bridge crossing reenactment marking the 55th anniversary of Selma's Bloody Sunday in Selma, Alabama. Lewis marched for civil rights across the bridge 55 years ago. Some of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates attended the Selma bridge crossing jubilee ahead of Super Tuesday. Brett Carlsen // Getty Images March 4: Tornado outbreak in Tennessee Families sort through tornado debris to gather possessions in Cookeville, Tennessee tornado passed through the Nashville area early Tuesday morning which left Putnam County with 18 killed and 38 unaccounted for. You may also like: Could you pass the U.S. citizenship test? 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 8/76 Spencer Platt // Getty Images March 7 international travel distrupted People walk through a sparse international departure terminal at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York City as concern over the coronavirus grows. The number of global coronavirus infections at that point had surpassed 100,000, causing disruptions throughout the globe. The airline and travel industries were hit especially hard by the outbreak, with business and leisure travelers canceling plans. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 9/76 Justin Sullivan // Getty Images March 13: Stocking up on food and toilet paper customer stands by his two shopping carts at Costco in Richmond, California. Many Americans stocked up on food, toilet paper, water, and other items after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Jeenah Moon // Getty Images March 11: Stock market reacts to coronavirus Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York City. The Dow plunged more than 1,400 points as coronavirus cases rose around the world. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 10/76 Joe Raedle // Getty Images March 18: Drive-through testing member of the health care staff from the Community Health of South Florida, Inc. prepares to test people for the coronavirus in the parking lot of its Doris Ison Health Center in Miami. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 11/76 via Getty Images March 20: Schools closed Joachim, 8, whose school was closed following the coronavirus outbreak, does school exercises at home with his dad Pierre-Yves in Washington. As millions of families hunkered down amid the coronavirus crisis, the sudden reality of schooling from home risked widening the education gap between those with the means and support to keep up with lessons, and those at risk of falling behind. You may also like: U.S. Marine Corps history from the year you were born Thomas A. Ferrara/Newsday via Getty Images March 22: Inspirational signs to brighten the mood Eight-year-old Anna Weir and her mother, Melissa Weir, make chalk drawings on the driveway of their West Islip, New York, home to help brighten the mood of people passing by while everyone is under shelter-in-place orders. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 12/76 Chris Graythen // Getty Images March 24: Pet fostering and adoptions rise Layla the dog waits as paperwork is completed to take her to a new foster home at the Animal Rescue of New Orleans. There has been a spike in applications to foster and adopt pets throughout the pandemic, but social distancing efforts have made it more difficult for animal rescues to carry out rehoming efforts. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 13/76 via Getty Images March 25: Daily briefings from the White House Coronavirus Task Force President Donald Trump speaks during the daily briefing on the novel coronavirus in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on March 25 in Washington D.C. He is flanked by (from R) response coordinator for White House Coronavirus Task Force Deborah Birx, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Vice President Mike Pence, and Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci. Joe Raedle // Getty Images March 31: Beaches closed in Florida Linda Bodell from Minnesota takes in some sun on the walkway leading to the beach in Hollywood, Florida. Hollywood, along with other cities along the coastline, shuttered their beaches in an attempt to contain COVID-19. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 14/76 Joe Raedle // Getty Images March 31: Contactless meals dog peeks out as a Taco Bell employee delivers an order to a customer at the drive-up window of the restaurant in Hollywood, Florida. Mark King of Taco Bell Corp. announced that Taco Bell drive-thru guests across America on March 31 would receive a free seasoned beef Nacho Cheese Doritos Locos Tacos, no purchase necessary while supplies last, as part of its coronavirus response. You may also like: U.S. Navy history from the year you were born 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 15/76 Robert Alexander // Getty Images April 5: Online shopping An Amazon Prime package is delivered to a mailbox by a U.S. Postal Service mailman in Santa Fe, New Mexico via Getty Images April 10: Pandemic Easter bunnies Chocolate bunnies for Easter decorated by Michael Rogak, owner of JoMart Chocolates, sit on a table in Brooklyn, New York. Hundreds of millions of people around the world spent the Easter holiday at home as lockdown measures intensified to combat the coronavirus, a pandemic with a global death toll that was at the time rapidly approaching 100,000. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 16/76 via Getty Images April 16: Filing for unemployment In this photo illustration, a person files an application for unemployment benefits in Arlington, Virginia. The government reported at the time that another 5.2 million U.S. workers filed for unemployment benefits, taking the four-week total to 22 million, a staggering figure in a downturn that economists said presented the country with its most severe outlook since the Great Depression of the 1930s. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 17/76 via Getty Images April 19: Protesting stay-at-home orders man waves a U.S. flag in front of the Colorado State Capitol building during a demonstration to protest coronavirus stay-at-home orders at a \"ReOpen Colorado\" rally in Denver. Many protested in cities across America against coronavirus-related lockdowns\u2014with encouragement from President Donald Trump\u2014as resentment grew against the crippling economic cost of confinement via Getty Images April 23: Census 2020 Demonstrators rally at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C. to protest a proposal to add a citizenship question in the 2020 Census. In March 2018, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross announced he was going to reintroduce for the 2020 Census a question on citizenship abandoned more than 60 years ago. The decision sparked an uproar among Democrats and defenders of migrants, who have come under repeated attack from an 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 18/76 administration that has made clamping down on illegal migration a hallmark amid Trump\u2019s reelection prospects this year. You may also like: Can you answer these real 'Jeopardy!' clues about your state? Noam Galai // Getty Images May 1: Gratitude for essential workers medical worker poses for a portrait outside Langone Health hospital in New York City as people applaud to show their gratitude to medical staff and essential workers during the coronavirus pandemic. COVID-19 had spread to most countries around the world at that point, claiming more than 239,000 lives with an excess of 3.4 million infections reported. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 19/76 Mike Marsland/WireImage // Getty Images May 4: Quarantine baking rises in popularity During the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown, there has been a surge in home bakers posting pictures of their bakes on social media, with more than 1.3 million posts for banana bread on Instagram alone. Jim Davis/The Boston Globe via Getty Images May 13: Resuming haircuts At the Solari Salon and Spa in downtown Portsmouth, New Hampshire, a sign outside of the front door explains the procedures that will be followed while a stylist works on coloring the hair of a client. The state of New Hampshire had at that point begun to open up some businesses. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 20/76 Jerry Holt/Star Tribune via Getty Images May 14: Reconnecting in person Friends (from L) Carrie Nasi, Tracey, Cindy Colema, and Lori Stayberg met for food and drinks at Jonesy's Local Bar on the first day of its bar reopening in Hudson, Wisconsin. Bars, restaurants, and everything else began reopening in Wisconsin after the state Supreme Court struck down Wisconsin\u2019s stay-at-home order. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 21/76 via Getty Images May 17: Social distancing People are seen practicing social distancing in white circles in Domino Park in Brooklyn, New York, during the Covid- 19 pandemic. You may also like: Least obedient dog breeds Elizabeth Flores/Star Tribune via Getty Images May 18: Retail reopening Shoppers make their way through Rosedale Center in Roseville, Minnesota, as some of the stores opened for business. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 22/76 Al Bello // Getty Images May 24: Family reunions Olivia Grant (R) hugs her grandmother, Mary Grace Sileo, through a plastic drop cloth hung up on a homemade clothesline during Memorial Day Weekend in Wantagh, New York. It was the first time they had contact of any kind since the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic lockdown started. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 23/76 via Getty Images May 29: George Floyd killed, launching widespread protests Flowers, signs, and balloons are left near a makeshift memorial to George Floyd near the spot where he was killed on May 25 while in the custody of the Minneapolis police. Demonstrations were held across the U.S. following his death in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. Bill Ingalls via Getty Images May 30: Space Launches In this handout image SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying the company's Crew Dragon spacecraft is seen in this false-color infrared exposure as it is launched on NASA's SpaceX Demo-2 mission to the International Space Station with astronauts Robert Behnken and Douglas Hurley onboard at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The Demo-2 mission was the first launch with astronauts of the SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 24/76 9 rocket to the International Space Station as part of the agency's Commercial Crew Program. The test flight served as an end-to-end demonstration of SpaceX's crew transportation system. Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images May 30: Distanced graduations for the Class of 2020 Kalysta Reed, 17, stands out of the sunroof of a car and adjusts her graduation cap as she waits for the parade to start at the Daniel Boone Middle School in Amity Township. Daniel Boone High School graduating seniors gathered for a car parade around the district schools, as they were not permitted to have a standard graduation ceremony due to the COVID-19 outbreak. You may also like: U.S. Navy by the numbers 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 25/76 Tasos Katopodis // Getty Images June 3: Black Lives Matters marches across the country Demonstrators march down Pennsylvania Avenue in in Washington D.C. during a protest against police brutality and the death of George Floyd. Elijah Nouvelage // Getty Images June 9: Primary voting continues People wait in line to vote in Georgia's Primary Election in Atlanta. Primary voting persevered around the country despite the coronavirus pandemic and with myriad protections in place. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 26/76 Ben Hasty/MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images June 24: Summer heat waves Children play in the spray from the fire hydrant at the Third and Spruce Recreation Center in Reading, Pennsylvania, for the first Wacky Water Wednesday. The city opened a fire hydrant equipped with a special cap that sprayed water up and into the street as a way for city residents to cool off. The city pool did not open this year due to the coronavirus outbreak. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 27/76 Michael Noble Jr. // Getty Images Pride Month: 50th anniversary of Stonewall Riots protester displays wings emblazoned with MATTER\u201d while marching in Brooklyn, New York, for the Black Trans Lives Matter Rally on June 14. Protests continued around the country in the wake of the death of George Floyd, including throughout Pride Month. David McNew // Getty Images July 4: Safe celebrations An aerial drone view shows a temporary drive-in movie theater at the Rose Bowl stadium, known for its spectacular Fourth of July fireworks that were canceled this year to reduce large public gatherings. Nearly all events planned in Los Angeles County to mark the 244th anniversary of the nation's independence were canceled or switched to a virtual format because of the coronavirus pandemic. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 28/76 You may also like: States doing the most for a clean energy future Olga Thompson/Walt Disney World Resort via Getty Images July 11: Walt Disney World reopens In this handout photo provided by Walt Disney World Resort, a guest stops to take a selfie at Magic Kingdom Park at Walt Disney World Resort in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, on July 11, the first day of the phased reopening. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 29/76 Harry How // Getty Images July 23: Major League Baseball opening day Los Angeles Dodger Enrique Hernandez, #14, hits a two-run homer off San Francisco Giant Conner Menez, #51, to take an 8-1 lead during the eighth inning on Opening Day at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles. The 2020 season had been postponed since March due to COVID-19. Spencer Platt // Getty Images Aug. 25: College students return to campus Students at New York University take a COVID-19 test outside of its business school in New York City. All students arriving back to the campus were required to get tested for the virus upon arrival, and again seven to 10 days later. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 30/76 via Getty Images Aug. 27: Hurricane Laura makes landfall in Louisiana People try to reach their homes in Cameron Parish on Aug. 28 by driving around downed power lines after the passing of Hurricane Laura south of Lake Charles, Louisiana. Gov. John Bel Edwards said the most powerful storm to make landfall in the U.S. state in living memory did not cause the \"catastrophic\" damage that had been feared. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 31/76 Mario Tama // Getty Images Sept. 5: Late summer heat wave People gather at the Pacific Ocean on the first day of the Labor Day weekend amid a heatwave in Santa Monica, California. Temperatures soared across California, sparking concerns that crowded beaches could allow for a wider spread of COVID-19. You may also like: Space discoveries that will blow your mind via Getty Images Sept. 9: Orange skies during California wildfires The San Francisco Bay Bridge is seen along Harrison Street under an orange, smoke-filled sky in San Francisco. More than 300,000 acres were burning at the time across the northwestern state, including 35 major wildfires, and at least five towns were \"substantially destroyed.\" 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 32/76 John Moore // Getty Images Sept. 16: Grade schools begin reopening masked first-grader attends class at Stark Elementary School in Stamford, Connecticut. Most students at Stamford Public Schools are taking part in a hybrid education model, where they attend in-school classes every other day and distance learn the rest. About 20% of students in the school district, however, enrolled in the distance learning option due to coronavirus concerns. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 33/76 Win McNamee // Getty Images Sept. 22: 200,000 American flags installed on National Mall to memorialize 200,000 COVID-19 deaths Chris Duncan, whose 75-year-old mother Constance died from COVID-19 on her birthday, walks through a Memorial Project installation of 20,000 American flags on the National Mall in Washington D.C. as the United States crosses the 200,000 lives lost in the COVID-19 pandemic. The flags were displayed on the grounds of the Washington Monument facing the White House. Erin Schaff-Pool // Getty Images Sept. 25: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg memorial service The flag-draped casket of the late Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in state in Statuary Hall of the U.S. Capitol during a memorial service in her honor in Washington D.C. Ginsburg, who was appointed by former President 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 34/76 Bill Clinton, served on the high court from 1993 until her death on Sept. 18, 2020. She was the first woman to lie in state at the Capitol. Scott Olson // Getty Images Sept. 29: First presidential debate U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden participate in the first presidential debate moderated by Fox News anchor Chris Wallace at the Health Education Campus of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. You may also like: Fastest-warming cities in the 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 35/76 emperorcosar // Shutterstock Where are they? Some are on the coasts, but others in coastal states are inland, away from crowds and tourist destinations. Many of the counties on this list have extensive parks, often honoring distinctive geographical features that offer exercise and exploration opportunities. Residents can also keep their minds sharp with museums, art galleries, plays, and other cultural pursuits. Some of the counties include universities that provide lectures, concerts, and other intellectual outlets for residents of the surrounding area. Others provide great shopping opportunities, theaters, restaurants, wine bars, and pubs for an evening out without navigating the traffic of a larger city. They rely on a range of businesses, from high-tech firms and hedge funds that have set up shop outside of urban centers to wineries and generations-old farms now providing organic fruits, vegetables, and other crops. Read on to find which county is the best to live in in each state. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 36/76 Sean Pavone // Shutterstock Alabama: Madison County - Population: 357,560 - Median home value: $180,600 (67% own) - Median rent: $829 (33% rent) - Median household income: $63,417 Jobs in Huntsville, the county seat of Madison County, are concentrated in the space industry, the military, biotechnology, and telecommunications, according to its Chamber of Commerce. U.S. News & World Report gives some of its public high schools top marks. Huntsville is also known as Rocket City for its work on rockets used in the moon flights, a history that can be found on display at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center. There are many outdoor recreation opportunities, including at the Rainbow Mountain Nature Preserve and the Green Mountain Nature Trail. Bildagentur Zoonar GmbH // Shutterstock 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 37/76 Alaska: Valdez-Cordova Borough - Population: 9,301 - Median home value: $229,800 (73% own) - Median rent: $981 (27% rent) - Median household income: $82,306 Valdez-Cordova Borough is home to the city of Valdez, whose port is the northernmost in the United States that is free of ice throughout the year. That makes it an important access point to the Alaskan interior. The Alyeska Pipeline Service Company employs some 800 workers in Valdez and elsewhere to maintain the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System. As you would expect in Alaska, many of the top attractions are magnificent outdoor sights like Worthington Glacier and Valdez Glacier Lake. There is also the Solomon Gulch Hatchery, the Valdez Museum and Historical Archive, an ice climbing festival, and Gold Rush Days. Sean Pavone // Shutterstock Arizona: Maricopa County - Population: 4,253,913 - Median home value: $242,700 (61% own) - Median rent: $1,079 (39% rent) - Median household income: $61,606 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 38/76 More than half the population of Arizona lives in Maricopa County, the state's most populous county. Phoenix is the county seat. Top attractions include the Desert Botanical Garden, with its research and conservation programs, Camelback Mountain, and the Heard Museum. shuttersv // Shutterstock Arkansas: Benton County - Population: 258,980 - Median home value: $172,000 (66% own) - Median rent: $873 (34% rent) - Median household income: $64,141 Benton County played a prominent role in Walmart's story, which is based in Bentonville and is where Sam Walton opened Walton's 5 & 10, now The Walmart Museum. Other important corporations in the county are J.B. Hunt Transport Services and Tyson Foods. The Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport is close by. Among the things to do, there is the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art and the Pea Ridge National Military Park, the site of an important Civil War battle. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 39/76 Uladzik Kryhin // Shutterstock California: Santa Clara County - Population: 1,922,200 - Median home value: $913,000 (57% own) - Median rent: $2,126 (43% rent) - Median household income: $116,178 Santa Clara County is one of the world's wealthiest places because of the presence of Silicon Valley. According to the Brookings Institution, Silicon Valley trails only Zurich, Switzerland, and Oslo, Norway, for per capita. Santa Clara County's largest city is San Jose, and it is home to the world-renowned Stanford University. The Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge is also there with its marshes and salt ponds. You may also like: 100 best community colleges in America 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 40/76 Maciej Bledowski // Shutterstock Colorado: Boulder County - Population: 321,030 - Median home value: $462,200 (62% own) - Median rent: $1,411 (38% rent) - Median household income: $78,642 Downtown Boulder, the county seat, features the outdoor Pearl Street Mall, with shopping and restaurants. University Hill is appropriately named as home to the University of Colorado. Chautauqua Park offers concerts, and there is hiking in the foothills and mountains above. Longmont, the county's second-largest city, has a creative district and affordable housing. Ritu Manoj Jethani // Shutterstock Connecticut: Fairfield County 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 41/76 - Population: 944,348 - Median home value: $422,300 (67% own) - Median rent: $1,470 (33% rent) - Median household income: $92,969 Fairfield County is part of the New York City metro area and has attracted top businesses in healthcare and financial services, specifically some of the largest hedge funds in the area. Residents here can live in a city or the country and find top-notch public and private schools\u2014at less cost than in Boston or New York. Real Window Creative // Shutterstock Delaware: New Castle County - Population: 555,133 - Median home value: $254,500 (68% own) - Median rent: $1,141 (32% rent) - Median household income: $70,996 Wilmington, the county seat, has such cultural offerings as the Delaware Art Museum, the Delaware Contemporary, and the Delaware Children's Museum. The Nemours Mansion and Gardens is a French neoclassical mansion on a 300-acre estate, built by Alfred I. DuPont. South of Wilmington is historic New Castle, with its Colonial and Federal buildings overlooking the Delaware River. Only Williamsburg, Virginia has more buildings of the period. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 42/76 // Shutterstock Florida: Seminole County - Population: 455,086 - Median home value: $224,000 (65% own) - Median rent: $1,198 (35% rent) - Median household income: $63,760 Seminole County is in central Florida with lakes and rivers, instead of ocean beaches. Historic downtown Sanford has a marina with a restored 123-year old paddle boat, restaurants, craft breweries, street festivals, and art galleries. Wekiwa Springs State Park offers swimming and canoeing, while the Wekiva River is federally protected for its geology, fish, and wildlife. The Seminole County Public Schools are ranked in the top 10 of the state's schools. John Trainor // Wikimedia Commons 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 43/76 Georgia: Oconee County - Population: 37,017 - Median home value: $268,100 (83% own) - Median rent: $970 (17% rent) - Median household income: $88,308 Oconee County is in the northeastern part of Georgia, and it includes the city of Watkinsville, a suburb of Athens and the county seat. There are more than 50 classes and workshops, vendors, music, and food at the Bushcraft Gathering. Watkinsville has the largest pottery show in Georgia large number of schools in the Oconee County School District are rated above average. You may also like: 50 best public colleges ranked from least to most expensive Izabela23 // Shutterstock Hawaii: Honolulu County - Population: 987,638 - Median home value: $649,800 (56% own) - Median rent: $1,703 (44% rent) - Median household income: $82,906 Honolulu County includes the city of Honolulu and the rest of the island of O'ahu. It's the home of the Pearl Harbor National Memorial and Diamond Head, the dormant volcano, and the famous Waikiki Beach. Residents and visitors can watch for humpback whales and visit the Hawaiian Mission Houses, which consists of three restored houses, two of them the oldest in Hawaii. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 44/76 Charles Knowles // Shutterstock Idaho: Ada County - Population: 446,052 - Median home value: $242,300 (68% own) - Median rent: $950 (32% rent) - Median household income: $63,137 Ada County includes Boise and the 25-mile Boise River Greenbelt, which follows the river through the city and opens into many of the parks. It's called the Ribbon of Jewels. You can float down the Boise River on tubes or rafts or hike the Boise foothills. There are six outdoor public pools, a family ice skating center, and the house of James Castle, an artist who was discovered when his nephew showed his drawings to instructors at the Museum Art School in Portland, Oregon. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 45/76 James Andrews1 // Shutterstock Illinois: DuPage County - Population: 931,743 - Median home value: $299,000 (73% own) - Median rent: $1,280 (27% rent) - Median household income: $88,711 DuPage County, a so-called collar community of the Chicago metro area, features parks, small downtowns, restaurants, and shopping historic mansion in Naperville now serves tapas while a restaurant in Oak Brook has brunch and bocce on the menu. DuPage is one of Illinois's healthiest spots, according to an annual survey, and its residents can take advantage of forest preserves, miles of bike trails, and golf courses. The Morton Arboretum in Lisle is a public garden and outdoor museum with a program in tree research. Schools in Dupage County have an average ranking in the top 5% of Illinois public schools, according to Public School Review, a website that provides profiles of public schools across the country. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 46/76 Todd Taulman Photography // Shutterstock Indiana: Hamilton County - Population: 316,095 - Median home value: $249,400 (77% own) - Median rent: $1,152 (23% rent) - Median household income: $94,644 Hamilton County is north of Indianapolis, a county with harvest festivals, a German holiday market at the Carmel Christkindlmarkt, and art galleries in the Carmel Arts & Design District and the Noblesville Cultural Arts District. Conner Prairie in Fishers is an outdoor museum about Indiana, a Smithsonian Institute affiliate created by Eli Lilly in 1934. On average, the county's schools rank in the top 5% of the state's public schools. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 47/76 Dancing Light // Shutterstock Iowa: Johnson County - Population: 147,001 - Median home value: $216,900 (60% own) - Median rent: $968 (40% rent) - Median household income: $61,640 The county seat is Iowa City, home of the University of Iowa, and it has a Museum of Natural History and the Iowa Children's Museum. At the Devonian Fossil Gorge, floods in 1993 and 2008 revealed the 375-million-year-old fossilized Devonian ocean floor. The Prairie Lights bookstore is an Iowa City favorite. You may also like: The most educated county in every state Jon Kraft // Shutterstock Kansas: Johnson County 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 48/76 - Population: 585,502 - Median home value: $244,100 (69% own) - Median rent: $1,065 (31% rent) - Median household income: $84,915 The mostly suburban county is outside of Kansas City, Kansas. It includes Overland Park, the second-largest city in the Kansas City metro area, and Olathe, the county seat. Some unique spots in Overland Park: the Deanna Rose Children's Farmstead and the Museum at Prairiefire, which collaborates with the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Schools in Johnson County, on average, rank in the top 5% of Kansas public schools. Alexey Stiop // Shutterstock Kentucky: Oldham County - Population: 65,374 - Median home value: $271,900 (85% own) - Median rent: $906 (15% rent) - Median household income: $97,597 Oldham County is 20 minutes from Louisville, is noted for horse farms and bourbon, and has a top school system. There are tours of the horse farms, including Hermitage Farm, which has raised Triple Crown winners. The Bibb Escapes/Gatewood Plantation is part of the National Park Service National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 49/76 Trong Nguyen // Shutterstock Louisiana: Ascension Parish - Population: 121,176 - Median home value: $191,300 (80% own) - Median rent: $979 (20% rent) - Median household income: $76,589 Ascension Parish is between New Orleans and Baton Rouge, with attractions like the Jambalaya Festival and the Swamp Pop Music Festival. The Donaldsonville Historic District is made up of some 640 buildings dating from 1865 to 1933. The National Park Service calls the architecture the finest of any in the parishes along the Mississippi above New Orleans. The River Road African American Museum celebrates African American history, music, storytelling, and more. Nearly three-quarters of the schools in the county are rated above average. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 50/76 Sean Pavone // Shutterstock Maine: Cumberland County - Population: 290,944 - Median home value: $269,200 (69% own) - Median rent: $1,081 (31% rent) - Median household income: $69,708 Portland is the county seat of Cumberland County, which is on the state's southern coast. Its name comes from William, Duke of Cumberland, son of King George II. Portland, on Casco Bay, Maine, is a center of arts and food, with Bon App\u00e9tit dubbing it \"America's Foodiest Small Town.\" The L.L. Bean Flagship Store is nearby in Freeport. Other attractions: Portland Museum of Art, the city's First Friday Art Walk, the Portland Symphony Orchestra, and the Portland Ballet. Casco Bay offers schooner rides. Public schools in the county rank on average in the top 10% of the state's schools. Nicole Glass Photography // Shutterstock Maryland: Howard County - Population: 315,327 - Median home value: $448,000 (73% own) - Median rent: $1,690 (27% rent) - Median household income: $117,730 Howard County is the central part of the state with Ellicott City as its county seat, and it is close to both cities and rural areas. You can visit the African Art Museum of Africa in Fulton, tour the Railroad Museum: Ellicott City Station, take part in an archaeology dig at the Patapsco Female Institute (once a Victorian girls school), and explore Howard County's sites on the Underground Railroad. There is the Howard County Living Farm Heritage Museum and the restored Ellicott City Colored School large number of its schools are rated above average. You may also like: Quiz: Can you guess which company owns these brands? 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 51/76 Jon Bilous // Shutterstock Massachusetts: Middlesex County - Population: 1,595,192 - Median home value: $476,500 (62% own) - Median rent: $1,541 (38% rent) - Median household income: $97,012 Middlesex County is north and west of Boston and includes Cambridge, home of Harvard University and the Harvard Art Museums, made up of the Fogg, Busch-Reisinger, and Arthur M. Sackler collections. Harvard Square is famous for its coffee shops and bookstores. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology is also in Cambridge along the Charles River. Farther north is Lowell, with its historic textile mills. The county's public schools rank on average in the top 20% of the state's schools. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 52/76 Agnieszka Gaul // Shutterstock Michigan: Washtenaw County - Population: 365,961 - Median home value: $246,000 (61% own) - Median rent: $1,083 (39% rent) - Median household income: $69,434 The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor is in Washtenaw County, west of Detroit. Ann Arbor is a lively university town, with restaurants, music, cafes, and breweries. Among the places to visit at the university, there is the Matthaei Botanical Gardens and Nichols Arboretum, the University of Michigan Museum of Art, and the Kelsey Museum of Archaeology. In Ann Arbor, there is the Classic Ann Arbor by the Sidewalk Food Tour and the Ann Arbor Art Fair. Checubus // Shutterstock Minnesota: Hennepin County 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 53/76 - Population: 1,235,478 - Median home value: $260,300 (62% own) - Median rent: $1,085 (38% rent) - Median household income: $74,113 Hennepin County includes Minneapolis, one-half of the Twin Cities, and the enormous Mall of America, America's largest indoor shopping center with stores and entertainment. In Minneapolis, there is the Walker Art Center to see, as well as the mural of Prince, and the Frank Gehry-designed Weisman Art Museum. In Eden Prairie, one of the county's suburbs, 95% of residents say the city's quality of life is above average // Shutterstock Mississippi: Madison County - Population: 103,498 - Median home value: $215,100 (72% own) - Median rent: $956 (28% rent) - Median household income: $71,690 One of the fastest-growing counties in Mississippi, Madison County is a suburb of Jackson. It has some distinctly Southern attractions such as the Cypress Swamp, where you can walk among tupelo and bald cypress trees and the 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 54/76 Mississippi Petrified Forest. The annual Scarecrow Festival has a barbecue, a cakewalk, and train and pony rides. The View Gallery features local artists. Kbh3rd // Wikimedia Commons Missouri: St. Louis County - Population: 998,684 - Median home value: $190,100 (69% own) - Median rent: $957 (31% rent) - Median household income: $65,300 St. Louis County is a suburb that lies between St. Louis and the Mississippi River. It boasts the Butterfly House, a butterfly zoo operated by the Missouri Botanical Garden in Faust Park in Chesterfield, and the Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site, in Grantwood Village, where Grant lived in the 1850s. The property consists of 850 acres of fields, orchards, and large woods. There's also the Laumeier Sculpture Park, which has more than 60 outdoor sculptures and educational programs in Sunset Hills. You may also like: 50 remote jobs that can pay well 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 55/76 Colton Stiffler // Shutterstock Montana: Gallatin County - Population: 104,729 - Median home value: $330,400 (61% own) - Median rent: $1,007 (39% rent) - Median household income: $61,499 Gallatin County includes Bozeman and has some unusual and exciting attractions. The Grizzly and Wolf Discovery Center in West Yellowstone offers an experience of the world of grizzly bears and gray wolves. The Museum of the Rockies has a collection of dinosaur bones, and the American Computer and Robotics Museum has exhibits spanning 4,000 years. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 56/76 Scruggelgreen // Shutterstock Nebraska: Douglas County - Population: 554,992 - Median home value: $161,400 (61% own) - Median rent: $906 (39% rent) - Median household income: $61,688 Omaha is the county seat of Douglas County, the state's most populous county. Omaha is known as the home of Warren Buffett and for its stockyards (which closed in 1999). Some current top sights that make it a great place to call home include The Durham Museum, which has exhibits of the history of the region in Omaha's former Union Station; the Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium; and the Mormon Trail Center at Historic Winter Quarters, a settlement of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as members made their way westward. Andrew Zarivny // Shutterstock 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 57/76 Nevada: Washoe County - Population: 450,486 - Median home value: $299,400 (58% own) - Median rent: $1,000 (42% rent) - Median household income: $61,155 Washoe County includes Reno, and because this is Nevada, there are casinos. Washoe County casinos collected $65 million in June, a 6.8% drop from the $69 million from last year due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Reno Gazette-Journal reported. Residents have plenty of other things to do, including picnicking and riding at Washoe Lake State Park and skiing at the Mount Rose Ski Resort. Schools in Washoe County have an average ranking in the top 30% of Nevada public schools. Josh Conover // Shutterstock New Hampshire: Grafton County - Population: 89,811 - Median home value: $220,400 (69% own) - Median rent: $922 (31% rent) - Median household income: $63,153 New Hampshire's Grafton County is home to Dartmouth College and Flume Gorge for hiking and the Loon Mountain Resort for skiing and snowboarding. There's also hiking, skiing, and camping in White Mountain National Forest, with its mountain lakes and high peaks. At Dartmouth, there is the Hopkins Center for the Arts and the Hood Museum of Art. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 58/76 FotosForTheFuture // Shutterstock New Jersey: Somerset County - Population: 330,176 - Median home value: $420,500 (76% own) - Median rent: $1,552 (24% rent) - Median household income: $111,772 Somerset County in central New Jersey is full of historic sites, including George Washington's last wartime headquarters. He stayed at the Rockingham Historic Site for three months in 1783 while attending the Continental Congress in Princeton. The more modern U.S. Golf Association Museum is in the Frothingham-Sloane House, a Georgian Revival mansion in Liberty Corner. Close to New York City and Philadelphia, the county has estates, working farms, and bustling main streets. You may also like: Ranking the reputation of the 100 most visible companies in America 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 59/76 Zack Frank // Shutterstock New Mexico: Los Alamos County - Population: 18,356 - Median home value: $292,200 (74% own) - Median rent: $1,037 (26% rent) - Median household income: $115,248 Los Alamos County famously housed the Manhattan Project during World War II, the federal government's effort to produce the first nuclear weapons. That work now can be studied at the Los Alamos History Museum and the Los Alamos Historical Society Archives and Collection. The county is also home to the University of New Mexico-Los Alamos national monument, the Bandelier National Monument, consists of more than 33,000 acres and evidence of human presence going back more than 11,000 years. Lewis Liu // Shutterstock 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 60/76 New York: Tompkins County - Population: 102,962 - Median home value: $199,400 (55% own) - Median rent: $1,107 (45% rent) - Median household income: $58,743 Tompkins County is in upstate New York and includes Ithaca and the surrounding areas. Cornell University is there, and the Cornell Cooperative Extension\u2014a collaboration between The College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and The College of Human Ecology\u2014works with communities throughout the state, bringing expertise on agriculture, the environment, and nutrition. There is also the Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art and the Cornell Botanic Gardens, hiking at the Taughannock Falls or the Cascadilla Gorge, and the famous Moosewood Restaurant Professional // Shutterstock North Carolina: Wake County - Population: 1,046,558 - Median home value: $265,800 (64% own) - Median rent: $1,102 (36% rent) - Median household income: $76,956 Raleigh is both the county seat of Wake County and the capital of North Carolina. The county is home to the North Carolina Museum of Art, the Marbles Kids Museum, the North Carolina Railroad Museum, and the North Carolina 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 61/76 Museum of Natural Sciences. The Chinese Lantern Festival takes place at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden. Guy // Shutterstock North Dakota: Cass County - Population: 174,202 - Median home value: $211,500 (53% own) - Median rent: $804 (47% rent) - Median household income: $62,031 Fargo is the county seat of Cass County. College football games are played at the Fargodome, also the home to concerts and theatrical shows. The Plains Art Museum shows regional and Native American art in a renovated warehouse and brings together artists and their audiences to support the arts. The Fargo Air Museum has two hangars of modern and vintage airplanes. Schools in Cass County, on average, rank in the top 20% of the state's public schools. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 62/76 dvgpro // Shutterstock Ohio: Delaware County - Population: 197,008 - Median home value: $293,900 (81% own) - Median rent: $1,040 (19% rent) - Median household income: $104,322 Delaware County, in central Ohio just north of Columbus, was named after a Native American tribe who were then forced to land west of the Mississippi River. The discovery of natural gas in the area sparked industrial growth after the Civil War. Today it has golf courses, craft wines and brews, and shops. The Delaware State Fair continues to play host to the Little Brown Jug, part of the Grand Circuit series of harness racing. You may also like: College majors that make the most money 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 63/76 Sean Pavone // Shutterstock Oklahoma: Tulsa County - Population: 642,781 - Median home value: $150,500 (59% own) - Median rent: $845 (41% rent) - Median household income: $53,902 Tulsa County is on the Arkansas River, on land that once was part of the Creek and Cherokee nations. The county is often called Oklahoma's gateway to \"Green Country,\" and cattle, horse ranches, and farmland are not far from the city's center, where businesses are focused on energy, aviation, finance, and computers. The suburbs are growing in cities such as Broken Arrow, Bixby, Collinsville, and Glenpool, while the Council Oak Tree remains in downtown Tulsa, the meeting place for the Creek, Cherokee, and Osage nations. cpaulfell // Shutterstock 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 64/76 Oregon: Benton County - Population: 89,780 - Median home value: $303,200 (57% own) - Median rent: $1,019 (43% rent) - Median household income: $58,655 Corvallis in western Oregon is the county seat of Benton County, and it offers wineries and craft brewers as well as places to hike and bike in the Willamette Valley. South of Portland and north of Eugene, the county is close to urban areas but also to outdoor activities in the Cascade Range and the Pacific Ocean. County Health Rankings by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found Benton County to be one of the top three healthiest counties in Oregon. Its economy is based in the tech and health industries and on regional agriculture\u2014including Christmas trees, wine grapes, and organic produce\u2014though recently, farmers have added hazelnuts and marijuana. There are festivals and fairs to choose from\u2014the county fair, the rodeo, and Da Vinci Days of arts and science. Dee Dalasio // Shutterstock Pennsylvania: Montgomery County - Population: 821,301 - Median home value: $305,800 (72% own) - Median rent: $1,253 (28% rent) - Median household income: $88,166 Montgomery County, part of suburban Philadelphia, is home to Valley Forge, the site of the 1777 and 1778 winter encampment of the Continental Army under General George Washington. Its largest municipality is Lower Merion Township. Other historical sites: The Peter Wentz Farmstead, an 18th century Pennsylvania German farmstead, and Mill Grove, built in 1762 and the first American home of artist, author, and naturalist John James Audubon. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 65/76 Allan Wood Photography // Shutterstock Rhode Island: Bristol County - Population: 48,900 - Median home value: $345,200 (70% own) - Median rent: $1,034 (30% rent) - Median household income: $75,578 Bristol County is in the East Bay section of Rhode Island. Bristol is known for a Fourth of July celebration that was established in 1785. Top attractions are the county's beaches\u2014Rhode Island is known as the Ocean State\u2014as well as Colt State Park and the East Bay Bike Path. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 66/76 Sean Pavone // Shutterstock South Carolina: Greenville County - Population: 498,402 - Median home value: $172,100 (67% own) - Median rent: $880 (33% rent) - Median household income: $56,789 Greenville County is in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains in South Carolina's Upcountry, halfway between Charlotte, North Carolina, and Atlanta, Georgia. Once a textile center, today it is home to French tire manufacturer Michelin, which chose Greenville as its North American headquarters in 1986, and more than 250 international firms. In the city of Greenville's downtown, there is Falls Park on the Reedy, with a suspension bridge and gardens in what is thought to be the spot that a gristmill once stood. You may also like: States with the biggest agriculture industry 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 67/76 Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock South Dakota: Brookings County - Population: 34,239 - Median home value: $172,300 (59% own) - Median rent: $727 (41% rent) - Median household income: $56,370 Brookings County is in eastern South Dakota. The name of the county and the city of Brookings come from a man whom South Dakota Magazine called one of the state's \"greatest pioneer promoters,\" Wilmot W. Brookings. Some highlights of the area: the South Dakota Agricultural Heritage Museum, the South Dakota Art Museum, and the Coughlin Campanile, a 165-foot chimes tower, all at South Dakota State University. marekuliasz // Shutterstock Tennessee: Williamson County - Population: 218,648 - Median home value: $417,700 (81% own) - Median rent: $1,443 (19% rent) - Median household income: $109,026 Williamson County, as The Tennessean newspaper wrote last year, is an outlier: the only county in Tennessee with a median household income of more than $75,000, its is $103,000, the only county with a poverty rate below 5%, and 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 68/76 the only one where more than 40%of adults have at least a bachelor's degree, according to a study by the Sycamore Institute. Some of its growth is attributed to the former Saturn plant in Spring Hill. Local attractions include the Arrington Vineyards, the Carnton historic house and museum, and The Carter House Civil War command post. Wirestock Images // Shutterstock Texas: Collin County - Population: 944,350 - Median home value: $288,900 (66% own) - Median rent: $1,297 (34% rent) - Median household income: $94,192 Collin County is in northeastern Texas, 30 miles south of the Red River in the Blackland Prairie region. Its county seat is McKinney, and the largest city is Plano. It is becoming one of Texas's most densely populated counties. The county's average age dropped, and education levels rose as young families moved to the area. Hispanics were once a minority but now outnumber African Americans. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 69/76 NicholasGeraldinePhotos // Shutterstock Utah: Davis County - Population: 340,621 - Median home value: $265,900 (78% own) - Median rent: $1,055 (22% rent) - Median household income: $79,690 Davis County is in northern Utah, home to the Great Salt Lake and Antelope Island, one of Utah's state parks and the home to 500 bison. The county is close to Salt Lake City, the CenterPoint Legacy Theatre, and the Hill Aerospace Museum at the Hill Air Force Base. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 70/76 Erika Mitchell // Shutterstock Vermont: Chittenden County - Population: 162,052 - Median home value: $288,200 (63% own) - Median rent: $1,230 (37% rent) - Median household income: $69,896 Chittenden county seat is Burlington, the state's most populous city, and there are lots of outdoor activities to do, from hiking to skiing. At Mount Mansfield, the highest peak in Vermont, alpine tundra survived the ice age, one of only three mountains where that occurred. At Shelburne Farms, the 1,400 acres are used for education. You may also like: 25 IPOs that skyrocketed on their first day Nicole Glass Photography // Shutterstock Virginia: Loudoun County 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 71/76 - Population: 385,143 - Median home value: $492,300 (78% own) - Median rent: $1,813 (22% rent) - Median household income: $136,268 Loudoun County is in northern Virginia, just 25 miles out of Washington D.C. It is farm country\u2014for vegetable farms, dairies and horse farms\u2014and you can pick apples, go riding, or watch a horse race. There are farm tours in the spring or the Loudoun Heritage Farm Museum to visit and more than 40 wineries. The county seat is Leesburg, once called Georgetown for King George II. kan_khampanya // Shutterstock Washington: King County - Population: 2,163,257 - Median home value: $493,500 (57% own) - Median rent: $1,494 (43% rent) - Median household income: $89,418 King County is home to Seattle, the farmers market at Pike Place Market, and the Museum of Pop Culture, founded by Microsoft's Paul Allen. You can visit the Space Needle or the Chihuly Garden and Glass to see Dale Chihuly's glass sculptures. There is the Seattle Aquarium and the gum wall, literally a brick wall covered with gum at the Pike Place Market. 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 72/76 Steve Heap // Shutterstock West Virginia: Monongalia County - Population: 105,252 - Median home value: $188,700 (56% own) - Median rent: $820 (44% rent) - Median household income: $49,926 Morgantown is the county seat of Monongalia County, where attractions include the Morgantown History Museum and the Art Museum of West Virginia University, the Forks of Cheat Winery, and the Cheat Lake Trail. There's also a museum to the coal industry in the coal mining state, the Royce J. and Caroline B. Watts Museum. James Meyer // Shutterstock 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 73/76 Filed Under: Sexual Assault, Stearns County District Court Categories: Courts, From The Newsroom, St. Cloud News Wisconsin: Ozaukee County - Population: 88,284 - Median home value: $273,000 (76% own) - Median rent: $903 (24% rent) - Median household income: $82,807 Ozaukee County is on Lake Michigan, north of Milwaukee. You can visit the Cedar Creek Winery or the Lion's Den Gorge Nature Preserve. There's a Wisconsin Museum of Quilts and Fabrics and the Ozaukee County Pioneer Village. The county's schools, on average, rank in the top 1% of the state's public schools Rolan // Shutterstock Wyoming: Teton County - Population: 23,059 - Median home value: $827,400 (58% own) - Median rent: $1,339 (42% rent) - Median household income: $83,831 Teton County is the home of Jackson and many outdoor attractions, including the Jackson Hole ski area, Grand Teton National Park, and parts of Yellowstone National Park with the Old Faithful geyser. There's an elk refuge in Jackson Hole and a Natural Museum of Wildlife Art. By: Aine Givens From: Best county to live in for every state 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 74/76 Stop Information Overload Should You Buy an Electric Car? Stop Paying Too Much for Your Prescriptions - Compare Prices, Find Free Coupons, Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com Get Mortgage Advice Close to Home Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Changes The Close Relationship Between Stress and Sleep Powered by RevContent 1240 Paynesville Man Formally Charged With Shooting at Police Officers Sartell Woman Charged in Fatal Car vs Pedestrian Crash St. Cloud Man Pleads Guilty in Domestic Incident Involving a Gun 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 75/76 Public File Equal Employment Opportunities Copyright Notice Marketing and Advertising Solutions Need Assistance Applications Report an Inaccuracy Terms Contest Rules Privacy Policy Accessibility Statement Exercise My Data Rights Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Contact St. Cloud Business Listings \u00a9 2025 1240 WJON, Townsquare Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Stearns County Jury Convicts Man of Sexually Abusing Young Girl Man to Stand Trial for Sexually Abusing Young Girl in Eden Valley St. Cloud Man Sentenced for 2022 Assault and Police Standoff Paynesville Dairy Farmer Charged With Racketeering and Wage Theft Albany Man Pleads Guilty to Sexually Assaulting 15-Year- Old Girl Man Found Guilty of Murdering Waite Park Woman 2/22/25, 10:31 Watkins Man Found Incompetent to Face Sexual Assault Charge 76/76"} |
7,463 | Morris Freilich | Northeastern University | [
"7463_101.pdf",
"7463_102.pdf",
"7463_103.pdf",
"7463_101.pdf",
"7463_102.pdf",
"7463_103.pdf"
] | {"7463_101.pdf": "archive.today webpage capture Saved from no other snapshots from this url search 14 Apr 2023 11:41:37 All snapshots from host share download .zip report bug or abuse Webpage Screenshot Northeastern Settles Students\u2019 Suit Over Professor\u2019s Alleged Sexual Harassment By Piper Fogg 28, 2001 Northeastern University settled a sexual-harassment suit early this month for an undisclosed amount after two female former students told a federal jury that college officials had ignored their complaints about a professor\u2019s unwanted sexual advances. The settlement kept the professor, who had said he would invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, from having to take the stand. Northeastern offered to settle with Kimberly Northrup, a former graduate student, who sued the institution in 1998. Ms. Northrup, who was a student of Morris Freilich, an anthropology professor, in 1995 in a course called \u201cCulture and Mental Illness,\u201d charged that the university had failed to protect her and other students from the advances of Mr. Freilich, who she said had a reputation for harassing women in his classes. The settlement terms prevent Northeastern from discussing the case, and Ms. Northrup\u2019s lawyer did not respond to telephone messages. But according to news organizations in Boston, she testified that Mr. Freilich had given her an unsolicited -- and unwelcome -- kiss on the face during an October 30, 1995, dinner in which he called her \u201csexually attractive.\u201d She said she reported the incident the next day to her academic adviser, who said she, too, had been harassed by Mr. Freilich. During a subsequent meeting in the university\u2019s affirmative-action office, Ms. Northrup said, university officials told her that the professor had \u201cdone this many times before\u201d and had at least three sexual-harassment complaints in his file. Mr. Freilich\u2019s supervisor, Anthony Jones, was assigned to mediate a settlement between the professor and Ms. Northrup. In the pact, he agreed to cease FEATURED: The Evolution of Race in Admissions Sign In Get Newsletters Letters Free Reports and Guides Blogs Virtual Events Chronicle Store Find a Job About Us Commitment Statement Write for Us Talk to Us Work at The Chronicle User Agreement Privacy Policy California Privacy Policy Site Map Accessibility Statement Contact Us Advertise With Us Post a Job Advertising Terms and Conditions Reprints & Permissions Do Not Sell My Personal Information Individual Subscriptions Institutional Subscriptions Subscription & Account Manage Newsletters Manage Your Account professional activities for nine months, but she said she felt deceived when he continued to work out of his university office -- across the hall from her office. When Northeastern told her that the settlement did not prevent the professor from using his office, she left the university before completing her graduate studies. The other former student involved in the case testified under subpoena last week that Mr. Freilich had touched her breasts and had later kissed her in his office. She complained to the affirmative-action office and said she was assured that the professor would be put on a leave of absence. But she found that in any event, he continued to frequent the campus. Edward Klotzbier, a spokesman for Northeastern, citing the confidential settlement, said only, \u201cWe\u2019re just pleased that the matter has been resolved to both parties\u2019 satisfaction.\u201d Section: The Faculty Page: A27 We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication. 1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 \u00a9 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education Twitter Instagram Youtube Facebook Linkedin", "7463_102.pdf": "The Huntington News \u2022 October 8, 2002 \u2022 sues-for-damages/ Former student sues for damages By Abigail Capobianco former Northeastern student has reopened a lawsuit against the university, accusing of retaliatory actions and refusing to follow through with the terms agreed upon in last year\u2019s settlement. Kimberly Northrup, a former graduate student, sued the university last September for failing to remove or chastise Professor Morris Freilich, after he had been accused of sexually harassing her and other students. As settlement for the lawsuit, Northrup was to receive an undisclosed amount of money from the university, along with the nullification of any debts owed to toward her education. In a legal complaint filed by Northrup and her attorney, Matthew Cobb, she claims that the only debt she had withstanding to the university was a $3,000 federal Perkins loan. Expecting that the loan would be paid off by Northeastern, Northrup had gone to Europe for part of the year, and upon returning to her home in Cambridge, Northrop found her loan had been increased to $5,000 and had been sent to a collection agency. Northrup is suing the university for $150,000, plus punitive damages, interest, attorney\u2019s fee, and the costs of legal action. According to the complaint filed on September 20, 2002, \u201cNortheastern was motivated to retaliate against Northrup for her filing of the suit, for her testimony in the suit, and for the negative public fallout thereby caused to the university.\u201d \u201cThat\u2019s a totally false and unfounded claim,\u201d said Director of University Communications, Ed Klotzbier. According to Northeastern, the university has no jurisdiction over a Perkins loans as they are federal loans, and therefore handled by the government. \u201cIt\u2019s a federal loan. It\u2019s not a Northeastern matter. It\u2019s the student and the lender; the university has no involvement in a federal matter,\u201d Klotzbier said. Neither Northrup nor her lawyer could be reached for comment. According to the legal complaint filed by Northrup, \u201cThe creditor for the Perkins loan was always and still remains the university, and the debtor, Northrup court ruling has not yet been reached in the case.", "7463_103.pdf": "sued for reneing on harrassment settlement Associated Press Published 2:00 a.m Sept. 21, 2002 Updated 11:56 p.m Dec. 16, 2010 former Northeastern University student who had settled a claim that she was sexually harassed by a professor has filed a new suit charging the university with retaliating against her. Kimberly Northrup, 31, received an undisclosed sum from Northeastern and her $3,000 debt to the school was forgiven, following the settlement reached during a jury trial in federal court one year ago. Northrup and another former student claimed they had been harassed by anthropology professor Morris Freilich. Her lawsuit claimed the affirmative action office received three complaints about the professor prior to hers. And even after officials promised her that Freilich would leave campus for several months, she discovered he was working in the office across the hall from hers. In the suit filed Friday, Northrup claims the university did not forgive her loan, instead turning it over to a collection agency. ''It's reprisal,'' Northrup's attorney, Matthew Cobb, told The Boston Globe. ''It's illegal to go out and retaliate against somebody because they went after you in federal court.'' Cobb said that when Northrup returned home in March from a teaching job in Russia she found collection notices, and credit rating had been ruined to the point where she was not able to secure a mortgage. Northrup is seeking $150,000 in damages. Northeastern spokesman Ed Klotzbier said a retaliation claim was ''unfounded.'' ''This case was settled over a year ago to the satisfaction of both parties involved,'' he said."} |
7,836 | Raul Caffesse | University of Texas – Houston | [
"7836_101.pdf",
"7836_102.pdf",
"7836_103.pdf",
"7836_104.pdf"
] | {"7836_101.pdf": "Louisiana Employment Law Letter H. Mark Adams, Editor; Sidney F. Lewis and Jennifer L. Anderson, Associate Editors September 2001 Vol. 10, No. 6 Highlights \u2022 Employer gets egg on its face from protecting golden goose \u2022 Police department scammed by the fuzz? \u2022 Outrageous! Or not? \u2022 Seaman's discrimination case sinks \u2022 How one employer learned the ABCs of ULPs \u2022 Unique company program held lawful Employer gets egg on its face from protecting golden goose We all have those \"golden geese\" -- those top producers, \"superstar\" employees, and indispensable individuals who bring your business fame, respect, and profits. So what do you do when that \"golden goose\" is accused of sexual harassment? You look the other way and hope it's not true, right? Wrong recent decision from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Louisiana) reaffirms what we've been telling you all along: Treat your employees equally and treat all allegations of sexual harassment seriously -- or you're going to be the one with egg on your face. Golden goose Dr. Raul Caffese was the head of the periodontics department at a university medical center. He was considered to be among the top 10 most famous academic periodontists in the world. He even had an endowed professorship named after him, and because of his esteemed position, he enjoyed a great deal of power in his department and throughout the university. Golden goose lays an egg Caffese began supervising Dr. Luis F. Mota, a resident alien and visiting professor who came to study periodontics under the doctor. Mota, however, was unprepared for this particular \"course of study.\" While at a conference, Caffese sexually propositioned him and allegedly threatened to affect his immigration status if he refused to comply. During the next few conferences, the doctor continued making sexual advances toward him. When he refused to share a room with Caffese at one of the conferences, the doctor allegedly told him he could not work in the department if he continued to reject him. At another conference, the doctor allegedly claimed the university would protect him, as it had in the past, if Mota pursued any type of complaint against him. To make sure he got the picture, Caffese allegedly added that he had \"helped\" other people at the school to leave when he didn't like them. About eight months after one of those \"educational\" conferences, Mota submitted a detailed, written harassment complaint against Caffese to the university. The investigatory panel assigned to address the complaint did not include anyone with past dealings with Caffese or anyone from the university's medical or dental school. Employer builds a golden cage The investigatory panel concluded it was unable to determine whether Caffese had violated the university's sexual harassment policy -- despite the fact that he confessed to sexually propositioning Mota. Days after the panel notified Mota of its decision, he requested protection against further harassment and retaliation by the doctor. In response, the university told both doctors to work it out themselves so they could continue working in the department. And the golden goose waddles right out of it Caffese and the university chose to \"work things out\" by: 1. allowing Caffese to arrange Mota's schedule so the two were in constant contact; 2. denying Mota a stipend he had previously received; 3. denying Mota's request for a paid six-month leave of absence to address mental and physical problems allegedly brought on by the harassment; 4. refusing to allow Mota access to his office while he was taking unpaid leave; 5. refusing to allow Mota to serve on various boards and teach in Spain; and 6. denying Mota's request for an additional six months of unpaid personal leave. To top it off, when Mota did not return to work after his leave (could you blame him?), the university fired him. He then sued Caffese and the university. Employer is left with egg on its face Caffese wisely settled with Mota by agreeing to pay him $290,000. So the university was left to defend itself alone to the jury. After all the evidence was in -- surprise, surprise -- the jury found Mota had been sexually harassed by Caffese and retaliated against by the university and the doctor for his complaints of sexual harassment. The jury also found the university gave \"golden\" treatment to Caffese because it had reprimanded other supervisors just for having consensual relationships with subordinates. Although he agreed to pay Mota $290,000, the doctor actually got off cheap since the jury hit the university for nearly $850,000. The jury's verdict was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, which reduced the award only slightly. Mota v. The University of Texas Houston Health Science Center, 2001 U.S. App 17877 (5th Cir. Aug. 9, 2001). How you can avoid getting goosed So what can you do to avoid this kind of disaster? Most of it is pretty obvious, but let's cover the bases: \u2022 Make sure your investigation is impartial. If the alleged harasser confesses or the evidence shows he did it, he needs to be disciplined, no matter how important he is to your company. \u2022 Make sure your discipline is sufficient to deter future misconduct. And make sure you discipline similarly situated employees the same way. You don't have to fire every employee accused of harassment, but the discipline has to be \"reasonably calculated\" to prevent further harassment. In other words, the punishment should fit both the crime and the circumstances. For example, for a first offense that's not too egregious, a written warning is usually sufficient. But for really egregious or repeated harassment, a suspension or even discharge may be appropriate. \u2022 Make sure an employee who complains is not treated differently after complaining. In this case, the evidence showed the university allowed other people to take leave, serve on boards, and teach seminars. The jury believed the university denied those privileges to Mota because he had complained. Remember, you must take all allegations of sexual harassment seriously -- no matter whether the accused harasser is the lowest employee or the president of the company. When you start giving special treatment to your \"golden geese,\" odds are there will be no \"sunny side up\" for you. Copyright 2001 M. Lee Smith Publishers does not attempt to offer solutions to individual problems but rather to provide information about current developments in Louisiana employment law. Questions about individual problems should be addressed to the employment law attorney of your choice. The State Bar of Louisiana does not designate attorneys as board certified in labor law.", "7836_102.pdf": "Case Law ( Mota v. Univ Houston Hlth Sci. Ctr. Decision Date 09 August 2001 Docket Number No. 00-20009,00-20009 Citation 261 F.3d 512 Parties (5th Cir. 2001 F. MOTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v AL., Defendants CENTER, Defendant - Appellant Court U.S. Court of Appeals \u2014 Fifth Circuit Your World of Legal Intelligence (/) United States | 1-800-335-6202 Document Cited authorities 54 Cited in 606 Precedent Map Related Page 512 261 F.3d 512 (5th Cir. 2001 F. MOTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v AL., Defendants CENTER, Defendant - Appellant. No. 00-20009 Aug. 9, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Before and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and DUPLANTIER,* District Judge E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 This case presents claims under Title of retaliation and sexual harassment by a member of the same sex professor at the University of Texas Houston Health Science Center filed suit, alleging that he was harassed by his supervisor. He also claimed that the University retaliated against him for lodging complaints with the University and the EEOC. Following a jury trial, the district court entered judgment for the plaintiff on these claims, awarding compensatory damages, back pay, front pay, attorney's fees, and costs. The University challenges the court's denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law, asserting error on an array of legal and factual grounds. The University argues that the jury's retaliation verdict was not supported by an adverse employment action and lacked an adequate basis in fact; that the alleged acts of harassment were not sufficiently severe or pervasive; that the jury erred in finding that the University had not established its affirmative defenses to the harassment claim; and that the court's award of front pay, attorney's fees, and costs was an abuse of discretion. We affirm the court's judgment in virtually all respects, vacating only a portion of its award of costs Dr. Luis F. Mota, a resident alien from Caracas, began work in 1993 as a visiting professor in the Department of Periodontics at the Dental Branch of the University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.1 He began his first year as a tenure-track professor with the University in 1995. At all relevant times, Dr. Raul Caffesse was the head of the Periodontics Department at the Dental Branch. Caffesse and Mota knew each other prior to Mota's term at the University. Mota's parents, who were also periodontists, knew Caffesse and would receive him into their home on social visits. Likewise, Caffesse would entertain Mota's parents when they traveled to the United States. After Mota moved to Houston, he continued this social relationship with Caffesse and Caffesse's family. Caffesse's stature as a renowned periodontist prompted Mota to apply for a position at the University. Caffesse, who had an endowed professorship named after him at the Dental School, was considered to be among the ten most famous academic periodontists in the world. In June 1996 Mota and Caffesse participated in a three-day conference in Monterrey, Mexico. The event was jointly sponsored by the Dental School and the University of Nuevo Laredo. Although Mota was not originally scheduled to attend, Caffesse told Mota several days before the trip that he should accompany him as a representative of the Dental School. Caffesse arranged for them to share the same hotel room. Mota later testified that Caffesse engaged in unwanted and offensive sexual conduct toward him while they were in the hotel room. During their time in Mexico, Caffesse allegedly told Mota that he had to \"get along with him and that people who worked with him had to get along with [him] and that he only wanted to know [Mota] better.\" Caffesse also suggested that Mota's immigration status could be jeopardized if he no longer worked at the University. Following the trip to Monterrey, Caffesse promised Mota that the incidents which occurred in Mexico would not happen again. He also told Mota that he had arranged for him to give a presentation at another seminar and that Mota would receive a $500 honorarium. Mota asserts that he took the honorarium money and purchased a present for Caffesse in excess of the $500. According to Mota, the gift was motivated by his desire not to be indebted to Caffesse. Despite Caffesse's assurances, incidents of harassment allegedly continued. Mota later testified that Caffesse engaged in unwanted and offensive sexual advances at conferences he attended in Philadelphia, Breckenridge, and Orlando. Caffesse also allegedly engaged in other acts of sexual harassment while he and Mota were in Houston. In the face of Caffesse's advances, Mota canceled conference engagements which he knew Caffesse would also attend uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 The record also supports the inference that Caffesse threatened Mota. During one conference, Mota refused to room with Caffesse. Caffesse angrily raised his hand in the air and told Mota that he could not do that to him and could not work in the department if Mota kept rejecting him. On another occasion, Caffesse allegedly told Mota that the University would defend Caffesse--as it allegedly had in the past--in any type of complaint brought against him. Caffesse further informed Mota that Caffesse disliked certain persons at the school, and that he had \"helped them to leave\" the school. He regularly admonished Mota not to tell anyone of his advances. On April 23, 1997, Mota submitted a detailed, written sexual harassment complaint against Caffesse to the University. According to Mota, he and a member of the Sexual Harassment Board had agreed that the investigatory panel would not include persons who had past dealings with Caffesse or who were associated with the Dental or Medical schools. Prof. George Stancel was appointed chairman of the three- member panel. Stancel was a medical school professor who apparently had worked closely with the spouse of a professor who worked regularly with Caffesse. Stancel later testified that he was aware of Caffesse's stature at the Dental School and that he had met him on at least one occasion. The members of the panel concluded that they were unable to determine whether or not Caffesse had violated the University's sexual harassment policy. During the investigation, Caffesse admitted to the panel that he had sexually propositioned Mota on two trips following the Mexico trip. Another member of the University testified before the panel that \"if you cross Caffesse, you are definitely in trouble. In other words, if you tell him 'no' you better watch out.\" Although Mota had recorded conversations with Caffesse, he did not submit these to the panel. The panel never asked for such evidence; nor was the panel aware of its existence. Mota later played the tapes to the jury in the trial before the district court. Upon issuing its decision, the panel notified Mota and suggested that, if he had new evidence, he could request a reopening of his case. Despite the evidence contained on the tapes, Mota did not ask the panel to reopen the case. Four days after the decision, Mota requested \"protection against further harassment and retaliation\" by Caffesse. In response, Caffesse told the Dean of the Dental School, Dr. Ronald Johnson, that he was willing to work out an arrangement acceptable to Mota, under which the two professors could continue working in the Periodontics Department. Dean Johnson did not learn of Mota's University complaint until July 16, 1997, when Mota sent him a courtesy copy of a complaint he had filed with the EEOC.2 University policy prohibits the panel from notifying the appropriate administrative authority in the University that a complaint has been filed. According to M. David Low, the University president, Johnson was the person responsible for protecting Mota from retaliation. In a meeting with Caffesse and Mota on July 23, 1997, Dean Johnson asked Mota to write a memo describing parameters under which he would feel comfortable working in the Department. When Mota declined to do so, Johnson instructed Caffesse to draft the document. The next day, Caffesse sent Mota a letter outlining guidelines. In response to the charges of retaliation contained in Mota's complaint, the University hired an outside attorney to conduct an investigation. The University contends that Mota did not cooperate with the attorney, whose April 9, 1998 report concluded that no retaliation had occurred. Mota does not allege that any further acts of sexual harassment occurred after the filing of his April 1997 complaint. He contends, however, that the University retaliated against him. First, he asserts that, in the wake of his complaint, Caffesse arranged Mota's schedule so as to bring them into constant contact. Mota alleges that Caffesse made this scheduling decision in the face of Mota's objections. When Caffesse relented and changed Mota's schedule, he reassigned him from some of the desirable graduate clinics to the less prestigious undergraduate clinics uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 To continue reading Request your trial On August 20, 1997, Johnson and Low denied Mota a $2,500 stipend for serving as the Dental School clinical coordinator. Mota had been the clinical coordinator since late 1995. However, the University contends that Mota had not performed the duties of clinical coordinator since September 1996. The University argues that the discontinuation of Mota's stipend resulted from an inquiry sent by Mota to Johnson, in which Mota stated that he continued to receive supplemental pay for the clinical coordinator position. Johnson testified that he stopped payment simply to correct an administrative oversight, as the University would not pay someone who was not doing the work required by the position. On September 10, 1997, the University denied Mota's request for a paid six-month leave of absence. President Low denied Mota's request, yet authorized six months of unpaid leave beginning November 3, 1997.3 Mota was to return to work on May 1, 1998. While Mota was on leave, he began looking for another job and visited his parents in Venezuela several times. He also requested that the University grant him access to his uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 374 cases Search in 374 citing cases \uf014 Floyd v. Communications Workers of America, Civil Action No. 3:02-cv-1588WS. ( law.vlex.com/vid/floyd-v-communications-workers-888865250) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Southern District of Mississippi March 17, 2006 ...employer's decision to terminate was in part on knowledge of the employee's protected activity. Mota v. The University of Texas Houston Health Science Center, 261 F.3d 512, 519 (5th Cir.2001); Medina v. Ramsey Steel Company, 238 F.3d 674, 684 (5th Cir.2001); and Chaney v. New Orleans Public...... Beaumont v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-141. ( law.vlex.com/vid/beaumont-v-texas-dept-885425443) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of Texas September 13, 2006 ...F.3d 485, 492 (5th Cir.2002); Perez v. Region 20 Educ. Serv. Ctr., 307 F.3d 318, 325 (5th Cir.2002); Mota v. University of Tex. Houston Health Sci. Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 519 (5th Cir.2001). \"An employee has engaged in protected activity when [he] has (1) `opposed any practice made an unlawful...... Le v. Exeter Fin. Corp. ( United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Northern District of Texas March 31, 2019 ...and citation omitted); Montemayor v. City of San Antonio, 276 F.3d 687, 692 (5th Cir. 2001); Mota v. University of Texas Houston Health Sci. Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 519 (5th Cir. 2001). \"If the plaintiff makes a prima facie showing, the burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitim...... Dortch v. Memorial Herman Healthcare System-Sw ( herman-891449827) United States U.S. District Court \u2014 Southern District of Texas November 28, 2007 ...an adverse employment action\"); Hernandez v. Crawford Bldg. Material Co., 321 F.3d 528, 532 n. 2 (citing Mota v. Univ. of Texas Health Sci. Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 521 (5th Cir.2001)) (loss of some job duties does not constitute an adverse employment action); see also Williams v. United States ...... Request a trial to view additional results uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 20 books & journal articles Search in 20 citing books & journal articles \uf014 Employment Discrimination Law-Overview & History ( books.vlex.com/vid/employment-discrimination-law-overview-940687355) United States James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 - 2017 Part V. Discrimination in employment August 9, 2017 ...559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1034 (1978). See, e.g., Mota v. University of Tex. Houston Health Science Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 527 (5th Cir. 2001). Plainly, calculations of front pay cannot be totally accurate because they are prospective and necessarily speculativ...... Age Discrimination ( United States James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part V. Discrimination In Employment July 27, 2016 ...use property. Williams , 242 F.3d at 319. \u00a723:1 23-6 company. See Mota v. Univ. of Texas Houston Health Sci. Ctr. , 261 F.3d 512, 524 (5th Cir. 2001) (\u201cTitle does not govern aliens employed outside the United States\u201d). c. The Bona Fide Executive or High Policy-Makin...... Employment Discrimination Law-Overview & History ( books.vlex.com/vid/employment-discrimination-law-overview-939852981) United States James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 - 2016 Part V. Discrimination in Employment July 27, 2016 ...559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034 (1978). See, e.g., Mota v. University of Tex. Houston Health Science Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 527 (5th Cir. Plainly, calculations of front pay cannot be totally accurate because they are prospective and necessarily speculative in nat...... Employment Discrimination Law?Overview & History ( books.vlex.com/vid/employment-discrimination-law-overview-941174258) United States James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 - 2014 Part V. Discrimination in employment August 16, 2014 ...559 F.2d 310, 358 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 1034 (1978). See, e.g., Mota v. University of Tex. Houston Health Science Ctr., 261 F.3d 512, 527 (5th Cir. 2001). Plainly, calculations of front pay cannot be totally accurate because they are prospective and necessarily speculativ uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 Request a trial to view additional results uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041 1-800-335-6202 Terms of use ( \u00a92025 vLex.com All rights reserved uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy (/terms-of-service \uf042 \uf041", "7836_103.pdf": "Top Stories: Giant waterpark coming to Texas | What are Abbott, Paxton texting about Professor not teaching but still receives salary or $150,000 or remains on the payroll By L.M. Sixel, Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle Aug 11, 2001 Harassment ruling upheld against professor whose advances toward another professor led to a sexual harassment suit is still collecting nearly $150,000 a year from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, though he's no longer teaching or working as an administrator there. Watch More Newsletters Sign in 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 1/8 Late this week, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a 1999 jury verdict and award of more than $900,000 for Luis Mota, a former professor of periodontics at the university. Mota testified he was continually hounded for sex by Dr. Raul G. Caffesse while attending dental conferences. Caffesse holds the Raul G. Caffesse Chair at the health science center. The 5th Circuit's ruling affirmed the lower court's finding that the university retaliated against Mota after he complained of the harassment. The university ultimately terminated Mota, who had been on track for tenure Article continues below this ad \"We're disappointed and plan to abide by the judgment,\" health science center spokesman David Bates said. The university will not appeal. 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 2/8 Shortly after the jury's verdict on Nov. 8, 1999, university officials said they told Caffesse to resign by 5 p.m. Dec. 6, 1999, or he would be fired. At the time, Frank Collura, chief legal officer of the health science center, said university officials were especially disturbed to hear during the trial that Caffesse had propositioned Mota more than once. But Caffesse, an internationally known periodontics expert, refused to resign, and the institution never fired him. M. David Low, then the president of the health science center, decided not to begin the procedures to strip Caffesse of tenure, Bates said. Caffesse is still a full-time faculty member and has retained his endowed chair but no longer teaches should be surprised, but I'm not,\" said John Zavitsanos, the employment lawyer who represents Mota. Collura said university officials decided not to proceed with the termination process because they felt the jury verdict wasn't enough evidence to justify that action. 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 3/8 Article continues below this ad The university would have to prove its case before a trio of tenured faculty members, the president of the university and the Board of Regents, Collura said. Instead, the health science center opted to put Caffesse on administrative leave, Collura said. He has an office but can't occupy it. He also retained his nearly $150,000-a-year annual salary from when he was program director of the periodontics department. Barbara Gardner, an employment lawyer who represents Caffesse, said she believes her client is the victim. He didn't have a lawyer representing him at trial and Gardner believes that, if he did, Caffesse could have proved it was Mota who was the instigator Article continues below this ad 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 4/8 Caffesse's malpractice insurance carrier had settled a case filed by Mota against him personally for $290,000. He didn't have an attorney representing him during the case against the university. In her 1999 decision, U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore said she decided initially to give Mota an award equal to an estimate of his earning power over the next 10 years. But after seeing the e-mail that Low sent to all 8,000 university employees contending that Mota had quit and not been fired, an angry Gilmore increased the award signficantly. Gilmore said she was bothered by the way the university \"arrogantly continues its campaign of libel and retaliation Article continues below this ad 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 5/8 Aug 11, 2001 L.M. Sixel L.M. Sixel writes about the economy and the workplace for the Houston Chronicle. She writes a weekly column called \"Working\" that appears each Thursday. She started her newspaper career at the Beaumont Enterprise. Before that, she earned a Bachelor's degree in sociology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Master's degree in economic history from the London School of Economics. Zavitsanos said Mota is working at the University of Pittsburgh, but he is not in a tenure-track position. And he's earning $20,000 a year less than he earned in Houston. Around The Web Powered by Find Useful Knowledge By Ethereal Search Engine Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? By Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com By 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 6/8 Stop Paying Too Much for Your Prescriptions - Compare Prices, Find Free Coupons, By Walmart Center for Racial Equity Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Justice By Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Mind More Accessible to All By Heartwarming Reaction From a Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for the First Time By Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness By Get Mortgage Advice Close to Home By Let's Play Cross|word Really Bad Chess Bongo SpellTower About Contact Services \u00a9 2025 Hearst Newspapers Terms of Use Privacy Notice Industry Opt Out Top 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 7/8 Your Privacy Choices (Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads) 2/22/25, 10:32 Harassment ruling upheld against 8/8", "7836_104.pdf": "\uf002 / / / Find a Lawyer Legal Forms & Services \uf107 Learn About the Law \uf107 Legal Professionals \uf107 Blogs 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 1/7 Recent Texas Case Illustrates The Issues By [email protected] ---- Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2001 Dr. Luis Mota, a periodontist, alleged that he was harassed by his supervisor, Dr. Raul Caffesse, also a periodontist. Accordingly, Mota sued his employer, the University of Texas Houston Health Science Center jury ultimately found for Mota, agreeing with him that Caffesse had engaged in a classic pattern of harassment. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld the verdict. The case provides one example of how same-sex harassment cases are being litigated now \u0000 in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in 1998, in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services. Oncale held that same-sex conduct can be the basis for a sexual harassment lawsuit, but only as long as the harassment is \"because of sex.\" The Facts Caffesse was world-renowned among periodontists family friend of Mota's, Caffesse encouraged Mota to apply for a job at the University and, once hired, took him under his wing. 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 2/7 After Mota's arrival, Caffesse arranged for them to attend a conference together\u0096and even to share the same room. During the conference, Caffesse sexually propositioned Mota, warning that he had to \"get along with him and that people who worked with him had to get along with him and that he only wanted to know [Mota] better.\" The unwelcome sexual advances recurred at a series of periodontic conferences across the country over a number of months. When Mota rejected the advances, Caffesse admonished him to keep quiet. He also implicitly threatened to have Mota fired: When Caffesse had grown to dislike people in the past, Caffesse allegedly told Mota, Caffesse had \"helped them leave\" the University. Mota also alleged (and the jury also agreed) that after he filed a formal complaint, the University retaliated by denying him a stipend he had earned, refusing his request for paid medical leave, and refusing to grant him access to equipment and his office during the unpaid leave he ultimately took. Mota filed suit initially against the University under Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination in employment, including sexual harassment. Because Mota was an employee of an educational institution that receives federal assistance, he might also have filed his suit against the University under Title of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in education. Plaintiffs sometimes prefer Title because it does not have any administrative prerequisites and damages are uncapped. However, many courts have held that discrimination claims brought by employees of educational institutions\u0096as opposed to students\u0096are pre-empted by Title VII, so Mota may have assumed that, as an employee, he could not bring a Title claim. In any event, whatever his reasons, Mota chose to sue under Title alone. After initiating suit against the University, Mota later added claims against Caffesse for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because Title does not permit individuals (as opposed to employers) to be held liable, those claims were brought under Texas state law. 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 3/7 Caffesse and Mota settled out of court for $290,000, but, as noted above, the case against the University went to trial. The verdict against the University came to nearly $900,000 \u0000 including compensatory damages, front pay, back pay, and attorneys' fees. Proving Harassment, and Proving that the University Should Be Liable To prevail against the University, Mota had to prove both that he suffered actionable sexual harassment, and that the University should be held liable for that harassment. Hostile environment harassment occurs when an employee is subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct that is severe or pervasive, and creates a hostile or offensive working environment. Those elements were clearly satisfied by Caffesse's conduct in this case \u0000 particularly in light of Caffesse's recurrent advances and his implied threat to retaliate. What about the requirement of proof that the University should be held liable? Under Title VII, an employer can be held automatically liable for sexual harassment committed by a supervisor that (as was the case here) does not result in a tangible employment action. The employer can defeat liability, however, if it is able to make out a two-prong affirmative defense. To establish the defense, the employer (here, the University) must show, first, that it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct harassment. It must also show that the victim unreasonably failed to take advantage of preventive and corrective opportunities made available by the employer. Same-Sex Harassment: Part of the Legal Landscape Now? So far, what is remarkable about the Mota case is how unremarkable it was. As summarized above, it was litigated more or less just as an opposite sex harassment case would have been. Did it matter at all that Caffesse was a man harassing a man? The answer is, in theory, yes, but in practice, no. The Supreme Court confirmed in Oncale that same-sex harassment is actionable under Title as long as it happens \"because of sex.\" With opposite-sex harassment, courts have often overlooked this requirement, simply assuming that when a man engages in sexual conduct toward a woman, it must be because of sex. But the Court in Oncale stressed that courts need proof that this requirement is met before they can conclude that actionable harassment had occurred. 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 4/7 The \"because of sex\" requirement can be proven in different ways, though the easiest is evidence that the harassment is motivated by sexual desire. In a same- sex harassment case, if a court has direct evidence that the harasser is homosexual, or can infer that from the nature of the conduct, it will generally presume the harassment occurred \"because of sex\"\u0096the victim would not have been selected but for his sex. Where there is no evidence of homosexuality or sexual desire, satisfying the \"because of sex\" requirement is more difficult. Post-Oncale courts have relied on comparative evidence about other victims (does the harasser in fact only target victims of one sex?), evidence about the nature of the conduct (did the harasser do something obviously sexual?), and evidence of the harasser's animosity toward his own sex (for example, was the harasser policing gender roles by punishing an effeminate man?). Can Fulfillment of the \"Because of Sex\" Requirement Be Presumed? Strikingly, the Fifth Circuit's opinion in this case is devoid of any discussion about whether Caffesse singled out Mota \"because of sex.\" The opinion contains no discussion of whether Caffesse is gay, nor does it note whether his past victims (there allegedly were some) were all male, or whether Caffesse bore animosity toward men. It seems that the conventional presumption in opposite-sex cases\u0096that a harasser engaging in sexual conduct is acting out of sexual desire that is reserved for one sex alone\u0096was indulged here, even though the case involved same-sex harassment. That may be evidence that cases of same-sex harassment cases are becoming a regular part of the legal landscape \u0000 a laudable development. Nevertheless, even if this presumption is applied in same-sex and opposite-sex case alike, it may be in conflict with Oncale \u0000 which stressed the need for proof of the \"because of sex\" requirement in sexual harassment cases in general, and in same-sex harassment cases in particular. Joanna Grossman, a FindLaw columnist, is an associate professor of law at Hofstra University, where she teaches Sex Discrimination, among other subjects. Her other columns on sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, may be found in the archive of her columns on this site. Was this helpful? Yes No 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 5/7 Questions? At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and \uf105 Our Team Accessibility Legal Forms & Services 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 6/7 resources on the web. Contact us. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Sign up for our consumer newsletter US: \uf09a \uf16a \uf16d Contact Us Learn About the Law State Laws U.S. Caselaw U.S. Codes \uf105 By Location By Legal Issue By Lawyer Profiles By Name Copyright \u00a9 2025, FindLaw. All rights reserved. Terms > | Privacy > | Disclaimer > | Cookies > 2/22/25, 10:32 <i>ONCALE:</i Recent Texas Case Illustrates T\u2026 7/7"} |
8,371 | Pokey Chatman | Louisiana State University | [
"8371_101.pdf",
"8371_102.pdf",
"8371_103.pdf",
"8371_104.pdf",
"8371_105.pdf"
] | {"8371_101.pdf": "Sources: Chatman quits as coach amid allegations 18y Revenge games: Who will come out ahead in these four massive matchups? 1d - Jeff Borzello and Amorim criticises United players for slow starts 43m Michigan extends May, ending Indiana speculation 17h - Jeff Borzello 'It was time': Yanks welcome new facial- hair rule 12h - Jeff Passan Cavs hand Knicks worst loss of Thibodeau era 13h Reds' Francona tells vets to skip challenges 19h Shiffrin struggles, Brignone shines in Sestriere 2h Reese posts Unrivaled's first 20-20 game in win 13h - Kendra Andrews Kuzma daps up ex-Wiz teammate in 'weird' scene 12h Are you not entertained? Man United go from ridiculous to sublime 1h - Beth Lindop 'Ripped away': Inside the Mavericks' struggle to manage the post-Luka trade backlash 1d - Michael Rothstein What the numbers tell us about Artur t bi it Bi l 2 Mar 8, 2007, 02:32 ROUGE, La. -- Pokey Chatman resigned as the head women's basketball coach at Louisiana State on Wednesday after the university became aware of an alleged inappropriate sexual relationship between Chatman and a former player on Chatman's team, sources told ESPN.com. ESPN.com news services Sources: Chatman quit amid sexual misconduct claims 2/22/25, 10:33 Sources: Chatman quit amid sexual misconduct claims 1/4 The university, the sources said, learned of the relationship from an employee within the basketball program. It was unclear when the alleged improper conduct took place, but when asked if it had occurred while the player was a member of a team coached by Chatman, a university source said, \"that's my understanding.\" ESPN.com's attempts to reach the employee by telephone and e-mail on Thursday night and Friday were unsuccessful. The 37-year-old Chatman, who initially revealed plans to quit after the postseason, said she will not coach the Lady Tigers in the Tournament. In a statement released Thursday afternoon, Chatman said: \"My resignation yesterday has prompted speculation and rumors that far exceeded my expectations and it is clear that my presence would be a great distraction during the Tournament.\" According to reports, Chatman was not forced out \"because it did not come to that,\" an official, quoted in The New York Times on Friday, said. Chatman \"became aware that Pokey Chatman, a Louisiana native, had been at Louisiana State as both a player and coach for nearly 18 years Photo/Charles Krupa Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Sources: Chatman quit amid sexual misconduct claims 2/4 this was being talked about by the university and that if she didn't do something, she wouldn't have a choice,\" the official added, according to The Times assistant coach Bob Starkey, who will take over the team for now, said he was unaware of any improper conduct that would have caused Chatman to resign abruptly. \"There's been 20 to 25 things that are just floating out there, and think she thought if she just stepped away from it she could eliminate that from even multiplying,\" Starkey, 47, said. \"She has her reasons, and hopefully, soon she'll address that herself athletic director Skip Bertman told the Times-Picayune of New Orleans, which first reported Chatman's alleged misconduct with one or more players Thursday on its Web site, that no formal inquiry into Chatman's conduct had been opened by the university. Bertman did acknowledge, though, that an informal investigation \"might have happened.\" \"The girl did what she did and had no control over that,\" Bertman said, referring to Chatman. Starkey said Chatman did venture onto campus Thursday to tell players she would not coach them during the Tournament. Her office, which overlooks the Pete Maravich Assembly Center, where she played and worked as a coach, was empty. \"Certainly the kids were disappointed to get the news. Pokey recruited all of those kids either as head coach or as an assistant,\" Starkey said. \"These are not just good basketball players, they're good kids, and think they're very close, and think that will help us to try and move forward with it.\" Players have been off-limits to the media since Chatman's announcement. According to the Times-Picayune, Lady Tigers practices are closed to reporters for the remainder of this week Tournament brackets will be announced Monday. Starkey said he and players were caught off-guard when Chatman told the team Wednesday that she wanted to pursue other career opportunities after this season. \"She came in and said for personal reasons some opportunities had come available to her - - that it was something she needed to move on,\" Starkey said. Tenth-ranked (26-7) upset then-No. 2 Tennessee last week in the Southeastern Conference tournament before losing to Vanderbilt in Sunday's tournament final. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Sources: Chatman quit amid sexual misconduct claims 3/4 Chatman was 90-14 as LSU's head coach. Before that, she was 15-5 as acting head coach during the latter stages of the 2003-04 season, when longtime coach Sue Gunter left the team because of lung disease. The Lady Tigers went on to reach the Final Four in New Orleans, where they lost in the semifinals to Tennessee. Chatman, a Louisiana native, has been at as both a player and coach for nearly 18 years guard, she was one of LSU's career assist and steals leaders. After her playing career ended in 1991, she spent one season as a student assistant coach and then 12 seasons as associate coach under Gunter won regular-season titles in her first two seasons as a head coach and made it to the Final Four both years. In 2005, Chatman received a four-year contract extension that paid her close to $400,000 annually, plus postseason bonuses ranging from $15,000 for making the Tournament to $70,000 for winning the national title. The highest-paid coaches in women's college basketball, Pat Summitt of Tennessee and Geno Auriemma of Connecticut, both earn more than $1 million per year. Information from the Associated Press was used in this report. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Sources: Chatman quit amid sexual misconduct claims 4/4", "8371_102.pdf": "Page 3 Good Drafting Makes Good Contracts by Martin J. Greenberg, Greenberg & Hoeschen, LLC, Milwaukee Sports contracts deserve the same precision of draftsmanship as any other legal document. When drafting sports contracts, our goal as lawyers should be precision and expression conferring a singular meaning. The document should be clear on its face so that it is not subject to third-party intervention. In essence, when drafting sports contracts we should adopt the principle of S.U.C.S. (Simplicity \u2013 Understanding \u2013 Clarity - Standardization) or K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid).1 Although the principles of S.U.C.S. have been promoted for over a decade, parties today continue to violate them while drafting sports contracts. Mistakes particular to sports contracts are repeated, resulting in mediation or arbitration between the parties.2 Recently, Louisiana State University learned first hand why sports contracts, perhaps even more than others, must be drafted with particular attention to the principles of S.U.C.S. Pokey Chatman (Chatman) was an integral part of the Louisiana State University (LSU) women\u2019s basketball program as a player and a coach for 17 years. Chatman was a point guard for from 1988 until 1991 and in 1991 received Kodak All-American honors in her senior year.3 During the 2003-04 basketball season, Chatman was appointed LSU\u2019s interim head coach replacing the legendary Sue Gunter. As acting head coach, the Lady Tigers finished the 2003-04 regular season with a 15-5 record and ended the season in the women\u2019s Final Four. In Chatman\u2019s tenure as a head basketball coach teams amassed an overall 90-14 record, including a 47-3 record after her first 50 games, which constitutes the second-best record after 50 games for a head coach in women\u2019s basketball history. Chatman received numerous awards in recognition of her coaching accomplishments, such as the Black Coaches Association Coach of the Year in both 2004 and 2005, the 2005 United States Basketball Writers Association Coach of the Year, and the 2005 Naismith National Coach of the Year.4 Head Coaching Record Season Team Record Tournament 2003-04 15-5 (Acting head coach) Final Four 2004-05 33-3 Final Four 2005-06 31-4 Final Four 2006-07 26-7 Resigned before Tournament Totals: 90-14 (105-19 including 2003-04) Despite her amazing accomplishments, on March 7, 2007, Chatman announced her resignation as head _____________________________ NOTE: The author extends a special thank you to Evan Schmit, a 2nd year Marquette University Law School student, for his help in the researching and writing of this article. 1 Martin J. Greenberg, Drafting of Player Contracts & Clauses, 4 L.J. 1 (1993). 2 Id. at 58. 3 LSUsports.net, Pokey Chatman Bio, May 16, 2007, 4 Id. Martin Greenberg Copyright 2007, Marquette University & Martin Greenberg women\u2019s basketball coach5. Chatman cited her reasons for resigning as wanting to pursue other career and business opportunities in the private sector. Her Employment Agreement, which was dated July 1, 2006, ended on June 30, 2009.6 The resignation was effective April 30, 2007, after the Tournament. It was later reported that Chatman resigned as the head women\u2019s basketball coach at after the university became aware of an alleged inappropriate sexual relationship between Chatman and a former player on Chatman\u2019s team.7 In her resignation letter, signed by both her and Athletic Director Skip Bertman, Chatman agreed, \u201cIt is my understanding that this resignation relieves me of any and all obligations relating to leaving the university prior to the term of my employment agreement, and further understand that it relieves the university of any obligation to me under my employment agreement after the effective date understand that this resignation is irrevocable upon acceptance.\u201d8 Article 12, paragraph of Chatman\u2019s Employment Agreement (Termination by Coach) indicates that if the Coach leaves the employment of the University \u201cprior to the term of the Agreement, Coach shall pay to the University in lieu of all other legal remedies, liquidated damages in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each year remaining on the contract as defined in Article 2 of this agreement.\u201d9 Chatman had two years left on her contract, but officials chose not to impose a $400,000 early departure penalty. After Chatman\u2019s resignation, the women\u2019s basketball team played in the Tournament under interim coach Bob Starkey. The team made it to the national semi-finals (the Women\u2019s Final Four) before losing to Rutgers has since hired Hall of Fame Coach Van Chancellor as Chatman\u2019s permanent successor. Contract and legal entanglements followed Chatman\u2019s resignation. Prior to her resignation, Chatman hired Baton Rouge attorney Mary Olive Pierson, who threatened to sue for the remaining two years of her client\u2019s contract in a letter dated April 13, 2007.10 Pierson argued that Chatman was entitled to an annual salary of $250,000 pursuant to Article 3 (Salary) of the Employment Agreement as well as payments of $175,000 for fiscal year 2007-08 and $180,000 for fiscal year 2008-09 pursuant to Article 8 for Radio/Television/Internet Payments .12 Pierson alleged that forced Chatman\u2019s resignation without just cause don\u2019t believe her consent _____________________________ 5 Karen Gross, Pokey Chatman Announces She is Stepping Down as Head Coach of the Women\u2019s Basketball Team, http:// (last visited July 5, 2007). 6 Employment Agreement between Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College and Pokey Chatman, July 1, 2006 [hereinafter Employment Agreement] at 1. 7 Women\u2019s Basketball, Sources: Chatman Quits Amid Sexual Misconduct Claims, ww1041707khpokey.19fa2c98.html (last visited July 5, 2007). 8 WWLTV, Associated Press, Lawyer: Pokey Chatman Did Not Willingly Leave LSU, Apr. 27, 2007, ww1041707khpokey.19fa2c98.html. 9 Article 12, paragraph (b) of Chatman\u2019s Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2006. 10 Glen Guilbeau, Chatman remain at odds, Shreveport Times, June 8, 2007. 11 Employment Agreement, July 1, 2006 at 1. 12 Id. at 4. Page 4 Although, the principles of S.U.C.S. have been promoted for over a decade, parties continue today to violate them while drafting sports contracts. Mistakes particular to sports contracts are repeated, resulting in mediation or arbitration between the parties. Copyright 2007, Marquette University & Martin Greenberg to the resignation was fairly obtained or freely given,\u201d she said.13 Pierson also maintained that promised to pay Chatman the money earned pursuant to Article 6 (Post-Season Bonuses) at the time of her resignation. Even though Chatman did not coach the team in the Tournament Pierson maintained that Chatman was eligible through her contract for post-season bonus dollars. Article 6 states: Post-Season. In the event the Women\u2019s Basketball team participates in post- season Women\u2019s Basketball games, the University agrees to pay Coach as additional compensation for the extra services required of Coach in the preparation for and participation in post-season Women\u2019s Basketball games as follows: a. $20,000 for Tournament Championship b. $15,000 for share of Regular Season Championship c. $30,000 for Regular Season Championship (outright) d. $10,000 for an appearance in the 1st/2nd Round of the Tournament e. $10,000 for Championship f. $25,000 for an appearance in the \u201cSweet Sixteen\u201d g. $50,000 for an appearance in the \u201cElite Eight\u201d h. $75,000 for an appearance in the \u201cFinal Four\u201d i. $150,000 for Championship The additional sum or sums, if payable, shall be paid within sixty (60) days following the post- season Women\u2019s Basketball game in which the University participates.14 Parts \u201ca\u201d through \u201cc\u201d and \u201ce\u201d do not apply for the 2006-2007 season as did not win titles and went to the Tournament instead of the NIT. Pierson contends that parts \u201cd,\u201d \u201cf,\u201d \u201cg,\u201d and \u201ch\u201d do apply as the Lady Tigers reached the Final Four under interim coach Bob Starkey before losing to Rutgers in the national semifinals. Under the possible bonus breakdowns, the Employment Agreement states, \u201c[m]ore than one (1) post- season game incentive may be earned during the season; however, the additional compensation shall not exceed $50,000 (for items a through c above) plus the highest achieved incentive (for items d through i) for a maximum of $200,000.\u201d Pierson interpreted the bonus language to be cumulative, thus resulting in bonuses of $170,000. Pierson arrived at her $170,000 total by adding \u201cd\u201d ($20,000), \u201cf\u201d ($25,000), \u201cg\u201d ($50,000) and \u201ch\u201d ($75,000 general counsel Ray Lamonica interpreted the bonus language to equate to the highest single achievement incentive, which would be $75,000.16 arrived at $75,000 by counting only \u201ch\u201d because the last line of the last sentence states \u201cthe highest achieved incentive (for items d through i).\u201d15 Lamonica said the phrase \u201chighest achieved incentive\u201d is key. \u201cNotice, incentive is not plural in that sentence,\u201d he said. \u201cThe highest achieved incentive is h, which is $75,000.\u201d17 ___________________ 13 WWLTV, supra note 8. 14 Employment Agreement, supra note 6, at 2. 15 Glenn Guilbeau, Chatman Would Drop Suit for Bonus Money, June 9, 2007, womensbasketball/2007-06-09-chatman-lsu_n.htm. 16 Glen Guilbeau, Chatman Remain at Odds TIMES, June 8, 2007. Page 5 Copyright 2007, Marquette University & Martin Greenberg Yet another confusing section of the bonus language is \u201cd,\u201d which states \u201c$10,000 for an appearance in the 1st/2nd Round of the Tournament.\u201d Does that mean $10,000 or $20,000? Thus, the bonus totals in Chatman\u2019s Employment Agreement can be interpreted in two different ways, one equaling $160,000 or $170,000 and the other equaling $75,000. Rather than Chatman suing the University for the package compensation enumerated in the Employment Agreement or the University suing Chatman for the early departure and agreed upon liquidated damages, June 20, 2007, the parties mutually agreed to a settlement of $160,000 from LSU, ending all contractual ties, claims, or future threats of lawsuits by either party.18 Chatman ultimately settled her disputes, but the settlement was based upon a contract that was subject to various interpretations. The ambiguous nature of the employment agreement arose out of a common mistake made in the drafting of sports contracts. The parties failed to clarify the cumulative or noncumulative nature of Article 6, the post-season bonus.19 While the contract clearly states that \u201c[m]ore than one (1) post- season game incentive may be earned. . .\u201d It then proceeds to describe the conditions of accumulation with little clarity.20 Rather, in a confusing and lengthy sentence the drafters explain all of the conditions subsequent as if intending to create a dispute requiring legal resolution. If the parties had separated the conditions or clarified the meaning with an example, then the intent would have been better articulated. Furthermore, the drafters should have been more specific in describing the conditions precedent to Chatman receiving post-season bonuses. The Employment Agreement merely states that, as further compensation for any \u201cextra services required of in the preparation for and participation in post season\u201d additional money will be paid for team accomplishments. What qualifies as preparation or participation? Some teams begin the season with the set goal of a championship. Thus, one could argue then that each day of practice and each regular season game is in preparation for the post-season. The contract does not clearly define when preparation for the post-season begins or what level of participation is required to receive the bonuses. These mistakes also go against the principles of S.U.C.S. Contracts that do not adhere to the principles of S.U.C.S. will land the draftsman, coach, and school in dispute resolution, whether that is through mediation, arbitration, settlement proceedings, or court action.21 Thus, it should be the goal of contract drafters to employ the principles of S.U.C.S. and avoid ambiguous contract language. _______________________ 17 Guilbeau, supra note 15. 18 Glen Guilbeau, Chatman Accepts Contract Settlement from LSU, June 16, 2007, sec/2007-06-15-chatman-settlement_n.htm. 19 Martin J. Greenberg, Drafting of Player Contracts & Clauses, 4 L.J. 1 (1993). 20 Employment Agreement, July 1, 2006 at 2. 21 Greenberg, supra note 19. 22 Id. Page 6 Contracts that do not adhere to the principles of S.U.C.S. will land the draftsman, coach, and school in dispute resolution, whether that is through mediation, arbitration, settlement proceedings, or court action. Copyright 2007, Marquette University & Martin Greenberg Along these lines, individuals drafting sports contracts should be mindful of these common errors.22 1. Shorthand Style-Use of Non-Definitional Words - Often words that are unique to the sports industry are employed. These words are non-definitional in themselves, possessing different definitions depending upon the context of their use. Such words might include; \u201ccut,\u201d \u201cleague year,\u201d \u201cactive list,\u201d \u201csalary guarantee,\u201d \u201cseason,\u201d \u201croster,\u201d and \u201cplays.\u201d 2. The Use of Excessive Legal Verbiage and the Absence of Specificity - Legal verse and prose lead to drafting confusion and excessive verbiage. It is essential that any condition precedent or condition subsequent be stated with specificity, providing for the time and upon which events the condition will be met or will fail. 3. Failure to State with Specificity the Rating or Assessment System that Will Earn the Player/ Coach the Bonus - For example, in the bonus clause \u201c\u2026player will receive $25,000 if he leads the League in pass receptions\u2026,\u201d does the language mean that the player will earn the bonus if he leads the league in the number of passes caught, or if he leads the league in the average yards per reception, or if he leads the league in total yardage as a result of a total number of receptions caught? 4. Awarding of Bonuses that Are Subject to Ambiguous or Nonexistent Statistical Achievements - Such as the number of tackles (assisted or unassisted) or quarterback ratings. 5. Failure to State whether the Bonuses, Regardless if within a Performance or Honors Bonus Category, Are Cumulative or Noncumulative. 6. In the Case of Honor Bonuses, a Failure to State which Reporting Agency Qualifies the Player/Coach for the Bonus - Such as Associated Press, United Press International, Newspaper Enterprise Association, The Sporting News, Pro Football Weekly Today and Pro Football Digest to name a few. 7. Failure to State whether the Particular Bonus Provision Is Subject to a Qualifying Standard- For example, with the contractual language, \u201cPlayer is to receive a bonus of $25,000 if he leads the league in kick-off returns.\u201d Player may have one kick-off return and lead the league, but what is intended is that the player have a minimum number of kick-off returns in order to qualify for the bonus. 8. Failure to State what Happens to the Contract Provision in the Event that the Player is Traded or Assigned or Coach is Fired or Resigns. 9. Failure to State which Records Will Constitute the Official Records to Determine Achievement of a Performance Bonus, Such as Conference, League, or Team Records. 10. Failure to State What Effect, if Any, Injuries May Have upon the Player\u2019s or Coach\u2019s Opportunity to Either Achieve or Earn Bonuses. Page 7 Copyright 2007, Marquette University & Martin Greenberg", "8371_103.pdf": "\ue921 Show Path \ue921 \ue923Scandals in College Sports ( ( Policies Next Chapter\ue924 (chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315737225-20/protecting-pride-andrew-howard-nichols-emil-cunningham?context=ubx) Chapter \ue923Previous Chapter (chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315737225-18/wrestlers-gone-wild-shaun-harper-charles-davis-iii?context=ubx) By Willis A. Jones (/search?contributorName=Willis A. Jones&contributorRole=author&redirectFromPDP=true&context=ubx), Neal H. Hutchens (/search? contributorName=Neal H. Hutchens&contributorRole=author&redirectFromPDP=true&context=ubx) Book Scandals in College Sports ( a7b2-59b4b07298c0&context=ubx) Share Illegal Contact? Player-Coach Sexual Relationships at and Boston College Edition 1st Edition First Published 2017 Imprint Routledge Pages 12 eBook 9781315737225 2/22/25, 10:33 Illegal Contact? Player-Coach Sexual Relationships at and Boston 1/2 \ue921 \ue921 \ue921 Journals Corporate Help & Contact Connect with us \ue91a ( &-francis-group/) ( lang=en) \ue900 ( \ue902 ( Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG \u00a9 2025 Informa Limited \ue91c 2/22/25, 10:33 Illegal Contact? Player-Coach Sexual Relationships at and Boston 2/2", "8371_104.pdf": "Attorney: Chatman was given few hours to resign 18y - Elizabeth Merrill Mandeep shines in India's 4-0 win over Ireland Men's Pro League 11h - Anish Anand Deepika masterclass gives India 1-0 win over Germany Pro League (W) 14h - Anirudh Menon Pro League: Inconsistency the only constant for Indian teams in early running 2d - Anish Anand Are you not entertained? Man United go from ridiculous to sublime 1h - Beth Lindop draw: Liverpool vs PSG; Madrid vs Atl\u00e9tico 1d - Sam Marsden Man United handed Sociedad in UEL; Spurs get 1d Udinese drama: Lucca scores, promptly subbed 14h - Associated Press Brentford rout Leicester as hosts' woes continue 18h - Reuters Kuzma daps up ex-Wiz teammate in 'weird' scene 12h Cavs hand Knicks worst loss of Thibodeau era 13h Share The Pokey Chatman camp spoke Tuesday, and for the first time in six weeks, the embattled coach's intentions seem clear. She plans on coaching again, doesn't want her job back at and wants the university to pay her roughly $900,000. Elizabeth Merrill Apr 17, 2007, 06:34 Chatman's attorney forced resignation 2/22/25, 10:33 Chatman's attorney forced resignation 1/4 Reese posts Unrivaled's first 20-20 game in win 13h - Kendra Andrews Chatman's attorney, Mary Olive Pierson, said Tuesday her client was given about two hours to resign or be fired on March 7 amid allegations she had inappropriate sexual relationships with former players. In a five-page letter to the university, e-mailed to selected members of the news media, Pierson painted a picture of a coach unjustly treated and compared LSU's actions to \"the Nifong school of decision making.\" Pierson also said further legal action is likely if Chatman isn't compensated for the final two years of her contract. \"You can't con somebody into something and then hold them to the agreement,\" Pierson later told ESPN.com. \"They said, 'This is your option -- you're out of here or you're out of here.' That's pretty much what they said.\" Reached late Tuesday general counsel Ray Lamonica said the university gave Chatman two options on March 7 -- resign as head women's basketball coach or be put on administrative leave while the investigation continued. \"We will honor the resignation agreement, and that's it,\" Lamonica said. \"If it is a precursor [to a lawsuit], we handle lawsuits all the time.\" Pierson's April 13 letter to the university detailed an April 11 meeting with board of supervisors chairman Rod West in which Pierson wanted to \"state [Chatman's] position.\" She gave her account of the events of March 7, when she scheduled a 9:30 a.m. meeting with Lamonica to discuss rumors Chatman had heard about being fired or forced to resign. Within a couple of hours, Pierson said, her client was forced to resign. She said claimed to not know the names of the athletes who were involved in the alleged relationships, and said the university made no attempt to interview them. Pierson also said the university cited an \"absolute zero tolerance\" policy involving coach- player relationships that Chatman's camp later discovered didn't exist. \"If I'd have known on March 7th they didn't have a policy,\" Pierson said, \"she would not have resigned.\" Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Chatman's attorney forced resignation 2/4 Former assistant coach Carla Berry, a college teammate of Chatman's, reported the alleged relations to the university in February. The school hired Van Chancellor as its new coach on April 11, and Berry announced she was leaving coaching days after the announcement. Lamonica said the complainant -- he did not name Berry -- did not want to disclose the names of the involved student-athletes and that the university didn't require her to because \"we had that information from other sources. \"We thought, and we still think, that the privacy interests of the students need to be protected. And we're going to go to every length to protect the privacy of the students.\" Asked about a written zero-tolerance policy, Lamonica referred to bylaws and said Chatman's contract outlaid conduct policies. \"Does anybody believe you can do this kind of stuff and not have sanctions?\" he said. Though the relations were never outright denied in the e-mail, Pierson did call the claims \"stories\" based on hearsay. She said those \"stories,\" according to the university, took place when Chatman was an assistant coach. Pierson's letter said the university had prejudged the facts of the case. \"Frankly, it was my clear impression that the university had taken about two weeks to a) get one version of the story from Ms. Berry; b) make no effort to contact Coach Chatman to seek her input into the situation; c) make no effort to validate the unsubstantiated stories being told by Ms. Berry; d) rush to judgment; and e) terminate Coach Chatman and try to make it look like a voluntary resignation,\" she wrote. \"For a timely analogy suggest that the decision making process applied in this case was created by someone who must have graduated from the Nifong school of decision making.\" Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Chatman's attorney forced resignation 3/4 Mike Nifong is the embattled North Carolina district attorney who was recused from the Duke sexual assault case and later investigated by the state bar for improper conduct. Pierson said she was confident Chatman would return to coaching, possibly as early as next season. One thing is likely -- the legal wrangling will continue. \"LSU's interest is in having this case go away,\" said legal analyst Roger Cossack. \"It's not in LSU's interest to have a lot of publicity about what they knew or should have known. And on Pokey's side, it's in her interest to get a little money out of the deal.\" Elizabeth Merrill is a writer for ESPN.com. She can be reached at [email protected]. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Interest-Based Ads Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. 2/22/25, 10:33 Chatman's attorney forced resignation 4/4", "8371_105.pdf": "\uf002 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 1/24 How Pokey fouled out 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 2/24 Support The Advocate LGBTQ+ stories are more important than ever. Join us in fighting for our future. Support our journalism. One-timeMonthly $19.67 $50Other $5 $19.67 $50 Join the Fight legend Pokey Chatman leaves her post as women's basketball coach after an assistant alleges sexual misconduct with at least one former player 29 2007 12:00 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 3/24 When Pokey Chatman resigned from her post as head coach of Louisiana State University's women's basketball team one week before her Lady Tigers, which were ranked 10th nationally, were set to enter the tournament, things didn't look good for LSU--or Chatman. Then it was reported the following week that she had been turned in by her assistant coach Carla Berry for \"inappropriate sexual conduct\" with a former player, and several things--including Berry's timing and motivation--remained unclear. On Wednesday, March 7, after meeting with her players and announcing her resignation, Chatman issued a brief statement explaining that she would be leaving after its last game to \"pursue career opportunities.\" The following day, however, the athletic department's 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 4/24 Web site quoted Chatman as saying: \"My resignation yesterday has prompted speculation and rumors that far exceeded my expectations, and it is clear that my presence would be a great distraction during the Tournament believe it is in the best interests of the team that step away from my coaching duties immediately want the players and staff to have the best chance to maximize the opportunities we've earned have every confidence in the young ladies and the remaining coaches that they will have success in the Tournament.\" Simultaneously the stories of her alleged misconduct began coming out on ESPN.com and in the New Orleans Times-Picayune newspaper. By Friday, Chatman all but disappeared and has since had no communication with the media. Initially denied knowledge of any formal investigation and claimed that her resignation was her \"preference.\" Athletic director Skip Bertman said, \"The girl [referring to 37-year-old Chatman] did what she did, and had no control over that.\" The university still maintains it isn't aware of any lawsuit being brought against itself or Chatman. Later, however, Bertman admitted that Chatman had not been allowed to be alone with any of her players since mid February, when Berry brought forward allegations that Chatman had had a sexual relationship with at least one player she Trump's orders prompt to erase resources Urzila Carlson is pushing the gay agenda in new Netflix film 'Kinda Pregnant' From 'Disease' to 'Die With a Smile'\u2014Lady Gaga drops 'Mayhem' tracklist 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 5/24 g p p y coached. One week after Chatman's departure, in an interview with The Advocate of Baton Rouge chancellor Sean O'Keefe said that Chatman resigned before they could finish an investigation into Berry's allegations, that they didn't involve any current players, and that Chatman demonstrated \"a pattern of activity that was disruptive to the team.\" In a statement released that week senior associate athletic director Judy Southard said can say, without reservation, that Coach Berry acted with heartfelt interests for her alma mater and the student-athletes at 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 6/24 According to LSU's newspaper, The Daily Reveille, Berry told Chatman after the Southeastern Conference women's tournament ended on March 4 that she had told the university of her allegations. Chatman and Berry played together as undergraduates at LSU, had been on the coaching staff together for the past six years, and were said to be very close friends--Chatman is even said to have sought advice from Berry as late as the day after her resignation. Chatman, who has never discussed her sexuality publicly, played under legendary coach 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 7/24 Sue Gunter from 1988 to 1991. She also served as a student coach for a season before being named associate coach, a post she held for 12 years. When Gunter stepped down in 2003 due to acute emphysema, Chatman was named acting head coach and took the Lady Tigers to the Final Four round of the 2004 tournament. As permanent head coach, Chatman brought back to the Final Four in her first two full seasons. At the time of her resignation Chatman's won-loss record was 90-14, and her $400,000 salary put her among the NCAA's highest-paid women's basketball coaches. Teammates were initially barred from talking to the media, but all off-the-record reports indicate that players were shocked and devastated by Chatman's departure. Neither nor the has any policies prohibiting sexual relations between coaches and players or even faculty and students, and Chatman's alleged liaisons wouldn't specifically violate her contract. But in a recent statement spokesman Charles Zewe said, \"It's absolutely preposterous to suggest that the university should condone relationships between professors, deans, or whomever and students just because there isn't a written policy 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 8/24 Though heterosexual relationships between coaches and players can be romanticized in the media (Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Marion Jones, and Brandi Chastain all married their college coaches), same-sex relationships often spark scandals. As recently as 2001, Sports Illustrated reported that an alleged sexual relationship between Nancy Lieberman, who was then coach of the WNBA's Detroit Shock, and point guard Anna DeForge was causing strife on the team. Lieberman was dismissed from her position, though she continues to deny any sexual relationship with DeForge. Senior associate athletic director Herb Vincent told the Associated Press that because Chatman has not accepted another job (as of press time), she will not be subject to contract guidelines that stated she could owe up to $400,000 in fines--$200,000 for each year missed before her contract's 2009 conclusion has also agreed to pay her $33,000 monthly salary until her resignation becomes official April 30. Also, since has made the Final Four again this year, she's reportedly eligible to collect up to a $70,000 bonus Take a bite out of Netflix's new Las Vegas restaurant Joe Biden launches \u2018Out for Biden-Harris\u2019 campaign initiative to engage & woo LGBTQ+ voters (exclusive) Election season got you down? This crisis line is soothing LGBTQ+ mental health 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 9/24 Be sure to follow Advocate on your favorite social platform 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 10/24 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 11/24 09 2024 1:00 31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 12/24 26 2024 8:51 Gay actor Earl Holliman, star of 'Police Woman,' 'Twilight Zone,' and more, dies at 96 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 13/24 30 2024 11:06 18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 14/24 04 2024 1:20 These are the 5 states with the smallest amount of LGBTQ+ people 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 15/24 13 2024 2:28 Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: \u2018We all know you\u2019re gay 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 16/24 24 2025 1:11 These 15 major companies caved to the far right and stopped programs 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 17/24 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 18/24 Watch Now: Pride Today For more videos and shows go to advocatechannel.com. 00:00 / 02:34 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 19/24 2 San Francisco Foundation and other LGBTQ+ groups bring new lawsuit against anti-trans executive orders 32 Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley fired as Mayor Karen Bass cites wildfire failures 1 Chris Kluwe 'figure he would get arrest for protesting \u2014 and he'd do it ag (exclusive 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 20/24 5 Ex player Chris Kluwe slams for 'trying to erase trans people,' gets arrested 4 Illinois Gov Pritzker condemns Trump\u2019s LGBTQ+ erasure & rising authoritarianism in blistering speech 6 Florida's new Attorney General sues Target for selling products for LGBTQ+ youth 2 Maine Gov. Janet confronts Donald Trump to his face o anti-trans sports or at White House 5 Creating Change Conference 2025 look back at a movement in motio 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 21/24 22 Out California firefighter stabbed to death; wife is lead suspect 20 2025 3:28 These transgender youth are founding their own committee: \u2018We won\u2019t be safe if we\u2019re silent\u2019 11 Opinion: Trump emulates Hitler in seeking to erase transgender people 20 2025 2:38 More adults than ever \u2014 including 23% of Gen \u2014 identify as LGBTQ+ 7 When doctors igno pronouns, patients the price. Here's wh 20 Mitch McConnell w leave Senate with egregiously anti- LGBTQ+ record 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 22/24 20 2025 1:18 Bianca Del Rio will emcee Equality PAC\u2019s National Pride Gala during WorldPride D.C. (exclusive 20 2025 7:00 Why Scouting America blazes a different trail 20 2025 10:23 Widower sues Long Island cemetery for denying husband\u2019s burial in family plot, citing anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination 20 2025 6:00 Why Donald Trump\u2019s suits are a sign that he\u2019s separating himself from his base 20 2025 4:45 Robert Garcia \u2018will be silenced\u2019 after attorney targets him for criticizing Elon Musk on 20 2025 1:40 Republicans strip Louisiana's only LGBTQ+ elected official of leadership role 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 23/24 2/22/25, 10:34 How Pokey fouled out 24/24"} |
8,402 | Shawn Wilson | University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire | [
"8402_101.pdf",
"8402_102.pdf",
"8402_103.pdf",
"8402_104.pdf",
"8402_105.pdf"
] | {"8402_101.pdf": "Former UW-Stevens Point official also accused of sexual misconduct at UW-Eau Claire Published 2:28 p.m June 29, 2018 Updated 3:48 p.m June 29, 2018 former University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point administrator who resigned during a sexual misconduct investigation left a similar job later at UW-Eau Claire \u2014 not just because his new employer found out about his past, but also because of new allegations student accused Shawn Wilson of sexual harassment two months into his UW-Eau Claire job last fall, around the same time the university learned of two complaints against him at UW-Stevens Point, new records reveal. Wilson, former UW-Eau Claire interim assistant dean of students and former UW-Stevens Point assistant dean of students, was accused of sexually harassing a student employee in the dean of students office in October 2017. The university first released the records to the Eau Claire Leader-Telegram via an open records request, then to the Stevens Point Journal. Wilson's job duties at Eau Claire and Stevens Point included handling gender discrimination issues on campus. Teresa O\u2019Halloran, UW-Eau Claire\u2019s affirmative action officer and Title coordinator, penned a memo to Chancellor James Schmidt dated Oct. 25, 2017, detailing the findings of a sexual harassment investigation she conducted into allegations against Wilson. She recommended his firing because of the allegations raised and how they were similar to those reported at UW-Stevens Point. Wilson met with university officials, including O\u2019Halloran, that day and then quit the next day, according to the records. Alan Hovorka Stevens Point Journal 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point former dean accused of harassment at UW-Eau Claire 1/4 \u201cIt is my opinion that Shawn Wilson violated UW-Eau Claire\u2019s policy on sexual harassment by engaging at UW-Eau Claire in unwelcome verbal and physical conduct of a sexual nature that unreasonably interfered with an individual\u2019s work or academic performance and creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working or learning environment,\u201d O\u2019Halloran wrote. The student alerted the university on Oct. 11, 2017, that Wilson made repeated comments about her physical appearance, hair and clothing, including that he really liked how she looked in dresses. RELATED: UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment case spurs System to review hiring policies RELATED: UW-Stevens Point assistant dean accused of sexual harassment, rehired at UW- Eau Claire RELATED: UW-Oshkosh misconduct cases include professor who sexually harassed student, got new job She also said in her complaint against Wilson that he touched her hair several times and gave her a side hug. He also attempted to give her a massage when he touched her shoulder, to which she responded by pushing him away and telling him not to touch her. When O\u2019Halloran and Joe Abhold, UW-Eau Claire dean of students, met with Wilson to discuss the complaint, Wilson denied the allegations except for saying that he told the student her clothes looked good on her and that he touched her hair once to remove something from it. He said his actions were taken out of context and that he should have known better and apologized. Around the same time in October, UW-Eau Claire\u2019s human resources director, David Miller, learned from a UW-Stevens Point official about Wilson\u2019s past behavior in August 2015, for which he was placed on paid leave in September 2015 and resigned in October 2015. The Stevens Point Journal first reported an incident at UW-Stevens Point, where Wilson was found to have sexually harassed a woman in August 2015. The woman told UW-Stevens Point investigators that he had accosted her for months, trying to get her to come home with him for sex. The woman said no every time and she said Wilson described what he wanted to do to her, using lewd language. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point former dean accused of harassment at UW-Eau Claire 2/4 In May, UW-Eau Claire told the Stevens Point Journal that Wilson resigned after the university was notified of his past behavior at UWSP, but didn\u2019t mention allegations raised against him during his brief tenure. The records released Friday to the Journal revealed a second person complained about Wilson's behavior at UW-Stevens Point. The woman, who filed her complaint after Wilson quit his job, said he routinely touched her hair, massaged her shoulders, gave her hugs, pulled her dress over to reveal her bra and engaged in other behaviors against her wishes. She said he continued that sexual harassment even after he was temporarily suspended in connection with the first woman's complaint. UW-Eau Claire investigators included the Stevens Point complaints in their report on Wilson, and concluded that it fit a pattern of inappropriate behavior. Wilson denied the accusations from UW-Stevens Point and UW-Eau Claire. In May, the System released a spreadsheet listing sexual harassment and assault allegations made against campus employees, but it did not include the second complaint against Wilson at UW-Stevens Point, or the accusations at UW-Eau Claire. Mike Rindo, spokesman for UW-Eau Claire, said the university didn't previously disclose those complaints because they didn't match the parameters of the public records request. He said he wasn't at liberty to discuss them until they were released. Rindo told the Leader-Telegram that the university acted quickly based on the allegation and the information from UW-Stevens Point. \u201cWe did our own investigation, confirmed the UW-Stevens Point information and within a matter of weeks determined that we needed to terminate his employment here,\u201d Rindo told the newspaper. \u201cThe allegations were found to be credible, and they were in violation of our policy regarding sexual harassment.\u201d In May, he told the Stevens Point Journal the university was unaware of Wilson's history when they hired him and that they rely partly on reference checks to vet job candidates. He said the university followed standard industry practice for background checking. Wilson worked at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, before UW-Eau Claire. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point former dean accused of harassment at UW-Eau Claire 3/4 Wilson\u2019s bosses at UW-Stevens Point, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Al Thompson and Dean of Students Troy Seppelt, did not disclose Wilson\u2019s history during reference checks. In response to reporting by NETWORK-Wisconsin, which includes the Stevens Point Journal, Gov. Scott Walker called on the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents to reconsider policies surrounding the disclosure and documentation of sexual misconduct allegations. One such change would require System schools to share personnel records, which will include documentation of sexual misconduct allegations and their outcomes. The board is expected to make a vote on the changes in August. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point former dean accused of harassment at UW-Eau Claire 4/4", "8402_102.pdf": "UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment case spurs System to review hiring policies Karen Herzog and Alan Hovorka NETWORK-Wisconsin Published 12:06 p.m May 31, 2018 Updated 2:15 p.m May 31, 2018 - The University of Wisconsin System will consider tightening its hiring processes and reference checks, after a news report that a UW-Stevens Point administrator resigned while under investigation for sexual harassment and landed the same job at UW- Eau Claire. The Stevens Point Journal, which first reported the accusations against assistant dean Shawn Wilson, has since learned that two different UW-Stevens Point officials neglected to disclose the confirmed incidents of harassment when leaders from Knox College in Illinois and Eau Claire called for reference checks on Wilson. Wilson was later hired for both jobs and has since left both schools. In all three positions at UW-Stevens Point, Knox and UW-Eau Claire, one of his job duties was investigating sexual misconduct. Gov. Scott Walker called for action in response to the news reports. On Wednesday, the System said it will consider a proposal to require all campuses to share personnel files of current or former employees with other campuses or state agencies as part of a hiring review. It also would require campuses to appropriately document any allegations or investigations of sexual harassment in personnel files. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel earlier this year requested all sexual harassment complaints from System campuses since 2014 involving supervisors and those in a teaching role with students. University of Wisconsin System Add Topic 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment spurs System to review hiring 1/4 RELATED: UW-Stevens Point assistant dean accused of sexual harassment, rehired at UW- Eau Claire RELATED: Four teachers found responsible for sexual harassment since 2013 no longer work there The Stevens Point Journal, which is part of the same NETWORK, examined and reported cases from UW-Stevens Point. In disclosing allegations of sexual harassment against employees, several campuses reported that they either did not have detailed records or the personnel files were incomplete. The Journal Sentinel requested additional information on discipline and whether the employees were still employed after allegations were substantiated. \u201cIn light of recent reports, Gov. Walker felt it was important for the System to reform their policies,\u201d his press secretary said. Under the proposed System policy, personnel files must appropriately document the final resolution of any allegations or investigations, including whether the employee was found not responsible, resigned, was disciplined or was terminated. One of the most shocking cases involved Wilson at UW-Stevens Point. Kept under wraps female employee of a business on campus accused Wilson of repeatedly asking her to go home with him and making sexual innuendos in 2015, even though both were married and she said no every time. Wilson submitted his resignation in October 2015 after the university concluded its investigation but before the disciplinary process could determine the specific policy violation, UW-Stevens Point spokeswoman Nick Schultz said. He was placed on paid leave during the investigation, but was later allowed to return to the job with some restrictions \u2014 such as being barred from the business where the victim worked \u2014 until his resignation took effect in January 2016. Wilson had worked for UW-Stevens Point since July 2013. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment spurs System to review hiring 2/4 Wilson met with UW-Stevens Point Bernie Patterson twice before his resignation to discuss the harassment investigation, which concluded that the incidents likely happened. Patterson did not discuss Wilson's employment status during those meetings, Schultz said. The Stevens Point Journal discovered that Wilson went on to hold his exact same job \u2013 assistant dean of students and deputy Title coordinator \u2013 at Knox College in 2016 and UW-Eau Claire in 2017. Officials from those colleges told the newspaper Wilson\u2019s behavior did not come up in reference checks with his former bosses Al Thompson, UW-Stevens Point vice chancellor for student affairs, and Troy Seppelt, UW-Stevens Point dean of students. Both were interviewed during the campus investigation of Wilson, so they were aware of the allegations. Knox College spokeswoman Megan Scott told the Stevens Point Journal that the university was unaware of his prior behavior and that, generally speaking, they would not hire someone to be on their Title team if they were aware of a history of sexual misconduct. Title is a federal law that bars sexual discrimination in education. Mike Rindo, UW-Eau Claire assistant chancellor for facilities and university relations, said they were unaware of Wilson\u2019s past behavior and that it\u2019s not standard practice to request personnel records. However, Rindo said that when a UW-Stevens Point employee learned of Wilson\u2019s hiring, that person contacted UW-Eau Claire and that Wilson resigned in November 2017, less than four months into the job. The Knox College spokeswoman declined to say why Wilson left the job there. Schultz, the UW-Stevens Point spokeswoman, said Seppelt and Thompson \"answered the questions they were asked. Neither voluntarily disclosed information about the sexual harassment complaint.\u201d Schultz said Seppelt and Thompson declined to be interviewed for this story. The System adopted a new sexual assault and harassment policy in 2016. That policy was intended to formalize the System\u2019s commitment to address the issue. It also required all employees to receive training to prevent and identify sexual harassment and was to have created a clear reporting path requirement. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment spurs System to review hiring 3/4 \"The System has zero tolerance for sexual harassment. There is no room for compromise on that commitment System President Ray Cross said Wednesday in announcing the review of System policies. RELATED: University of Wisconsin employees receive training in sexual assault prevention RELATED: Total $591,050 paid to settle UW-Madison sexual harassment cases in past decade \u201cWe will continue to work tirelessly to assess our policies and revise them as necessary to ensure that our campus communities are safe and welcoming places to live, learn and work.\u201d Under the proposed policy that the System Board of Regents will consider at its next meeting at UW-Milwaukee on June 7, hiring and reference check processes at all System institutions will be reviewed. The review will ensure that allegations or investigations of sexual harassment for current or former employees are \u201cappropriately disclosed\u201d when an individual is being considered for a job at a institution or by an outside entity. The proposed System changes were announced a week after UW-Stevens Point Chancellor Patterson ordered a review of policies at the university regarding the disclosure of sexual harassment complaints. \u201cUW-Stevens Point will ensure those in leadership positions are knowledgeable of and compliant with relevant policies, including the distinction between the right to privacy and the obligation to disclose allegations and investigations of sexual harassment,\u201d Schultz said in announcing Patterson's directive. 2/22/25, 10:34 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment spurs System to review hiring 4/4", "8402_103.pdf": "17\u00b0 Eau Claire \uf0c9 First Alert Forecast Healthcare Shutdown Community First Records show a University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point official who handled sexual misconduct complaints and resigned when he was accused of sexually harassing a woman on campus in 2015, went on to hold similar positions at other universities. UW-Stevens Point placed Shawn Wilson, assistant dean of students, on leave in September 2015 following the harassment complaint. Wilson resigned the following month. University documents obtained by the Stevens Point Journal and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel show Wilson then landed similar jobs at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois and the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Officials at both those schools say a UW-Stevens Point supervisor they contacted for a job reference didn't disclose the harassment investigation. Wilson worked at Knox College until September 2016, then went to UW-Eau Claire, where he resigned last November. Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools (WSAZ) By Published: May. 21, 2018 at 9:22 Crossout | Sponsored Packaging Machines | Search Ads | Sponsored Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now Top Packaging Trends In 2024 - Take Look Search Now 2/22/25, 10:34 Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools 1/5 Most Read Villas in Dubai | Search Ads | Sponsored Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Therapy Search Ads | Sponsored Expertinspector | Sponsored Digital Marketing Jobs Search Ads | Sponsored These Are The Best Breast Therapy From Punjab Price Might Surprise You Start Therapy for a Better Tomorrow Click Here [Click Here] 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software Learn More Find Your Dream Job In Digital Marketing - Exclusive Listings For Ambitious Professionals! Start Your Digital Marketing Career Click Here \uf144 Judge rejects plea deal for Wisconsin man accused of murder in 7-year-old\u2019s abuse death \uf144 Speaking out against the Trump administration in Eau Claire \uf057 2/22/25, 10:34 Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools 2/5 Latest News \uf144 Wisconsin woman competes on Thursday night\u2019s Wheel of Fortune \uf144 Man sentenced in Jackson County home invasion \uf144 Wisconsin Farmers Union holds town hall meeting to address federal changes sparking farming concerns \uf144 Greenwood Police Department gives follow up to incident at elementary school \uf144 Former Wisconsin high school student leaves school her estate \uf144 Augusta man accused of possessing child pornography First Alert Weather: Goodbye to the cold, hello to unseasonable warmth \uf057 2/22/25, 10:34 Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools 3/5 \uf144 SportScene 13 for Friday, February 21st (Part 2) \uf144 SportScene 13 for Friday, February 21st (Part 1) Memorial Hosts Crosstown Showdown Doubleheader \uf144 SportScene 13 Friday 2 \uf144 SportScene 13 Friday 1 \uf144 13 First Alert Weather \uf144 House fire in the City of Viroqua Friday night \uf057 2/22/25, 10:34 Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools 4/5 \uf057 Public Inspection File [email protected] - (715) 835-1313 Terms of Service Privacy Policy Statement Applications Advertising Digital Marketing Closed Captioning/Audio Description At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 News First Alert Forecast SportScene 13 Hello Wisconsin Community First Contests Morning Connection Contact Us 1907 S. Hastings Way Eau Claire 54701 (715) 835-1313 2/22/25, 10:34 Dean accused of harassment resurfaces at 2 other schools 5/5", "8402_104.pdf": "\ue902 Email This (mailto:?subject=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools&body=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2F \ue90a Subscribe to Newsletter (/subscribe/) Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools May 23, 2018 (mailto:? subject=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other ( u= ( original_referer=http ( offsite/? url= (https:// print) Article ( 2 Comments ( comments University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point official who handled sexual misconduct complaints and resigned when he was accused of sexually harassing a woman on campus in 2015, went on to hold positions handling similar complaints at two other universities, according to newly released documents. UW-Stevens Point placed Shawn Wilson, assistant dean of students, on leave in September 2015 following the harassment complaint and he resigned the following month, according to university documents obtained by the Stevens Point Journal and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. (/) Featured Stories Going After \u2018Anti-American Bias\u2019 in the Workplace ( \u2018Hallucinations\u2019 in Court Spell Trouble for Lawyers ( Articles Jobs Markets Search news, trends, videos and more Skip to content News (/news/) Magazines (/magazines/) Jobs (/jobs/) Subscribe (/subscribe/) 2/22/25, 10:35 Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools 1/3 \ue902 Email This (mailto:?subject=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools&body=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2F \ue90a Subscribe to Newsletter (/subscribe/) Schools&body=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fw Hard-to-place Markets? Find exactly what you need. Search our database of more than 700 companies and 22,000 market listings. Find Markets MyNewMarkets.com The university investigated and found Wilson, the school\u2019s Title coordinator, had sexually harassed a woman at the Dreyfus Community Center during move-in weekend on campus in August 2015. Wilson denied the accusations. ( is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sexual discrimination in education. Wilson\u2019s job included responding to complaints of sexual and behavioral misconduct. In January 2016, Wilson took a new job as associate dean of students for Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, where his duties also included serving as deputy Title coordinator. Knox College spokeswoman Megan Scott said the school conducts background and reference checks before hiring and generally would not hire an individual a person accused of sexual harassment to be associated with Title IX. Wilson worked at Knox until the following September. The University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire hired Wilson in August 2017 as interim dean of students, which again included responding to Title complaints. His tenure in Eau Claire lasted three months. Katie Jore, associate vice chancellor at UW-Stevens Point, said the school contacted UW-Eau Claire after learning that Wilson had been hired there. He resigned in November 2017. Jore said that Knox College and UW-Eau Claire had called Wilson\u2019s former supervisor for reference checks. Both colleges told the Stevens Point Journal that the sexual harassment complaint did not come up in those checks. Wilson\u2019s number is not listed in phone records. Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed (/EDUCATION/) Was this article valuable Interested in Education? Get automatic alerts for this topic. Enter your email... Submit (mailto:? ( ( ( (https:// Skip to content 2/22/25, 10:35 Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools 2/3 \u00a9 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy (/privacy/) | Terms & Conditions (/terms/) | Site Map (/sitemap 23, 2018 4:37 23, 2018 3:13 Categories: Midwest News ( Topics: dean ( harassment ( lawsuit ( university of wisconsin ( wisconsin/) Have a hot lead? Email us at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) Latest Comments Rosenblatt says: Please read the article all the way through to the end before you post accusations of fault. \"Both colleges told the Stevens Point Journal that the sexual harassment complaint... read more (/news/midwest/2018/05/23/490147.htm?comments#comment-4838050) Agent says: Apparently, something is a bit wrong with the vetting process for new hires at these schools. Add a Comment See All Comments (2) ( More News More News Features (/news/featured/) subject=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools&body=Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fw u= original_referer=https%3A%2F% offsite/? url= print) See Today's Top Insurance News ( 2/22/25, 10:35 Dean at University of Wisconsin Accused of Harassment Resurfaces at 2 Other Schools 3/3", "8402_105.pdf": "Woman accused former official of sexual misconduct after he quit for other allegation Published 5:46 a.m July 3, 2018 Updated 11:46 a.m July 20, 2018 Note: This story contains graphic descriptions of sexual misconduct that may be offensive to some readers or painful to survivors of sexual assault and harassment. We think it is necessary to report this information as a warning and a reminder of what comprises sexual abuse. This story also has been updated to correct that David Miller is the human resources director for UW-Eau Claire. His employer was misidentified in the original report female employee at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point came forward with her own sexual misconduct complaint against a former assistant dean after a university investigation found other harassment claims against him credible, new documents show. The woman worked in an office with former UW-Stevens Point assistant dean of students Shawn Wilson and said he subjected her to daily harassment and inappropriate touching, including pulling on part of her top or dress to reveal her bra and making lewd comments about what he wanted to do to her. The harassment became so common in 2015 that it was predictable, the woman said. She reported that the misconduct happened around the same time that Wilson was accused of harassing a different woman, who said that he repeatedly asked her to come home with him and made sexual innuendos even though she rebuffed him. In total, at least three separate women accused Wilson of sexual misconduct: Alan Hovorka Stevens Point Journal 2/22/25, 10:35 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment: Shawn Wilson accused three times 1/5 An employee of a business at came forward in September 2015 with accusations that he harassed her during move-in weekend in August 2015. The woman who worked in Wilson's office at UW-Stevens Point came forward sometime after he left that position in January 2016 female student who worked in his UW-Eau Claire office came forward in October 2017. The allegations from Wilson's co-worker at UW-Stevens Point first became public when records were released by UW-Eau Claire, where investigators had looked into the student employee's claims of sexual harassment and inappropriate touching. Wilson was hired as interim assistant dean of students at Eau Claire after he left Stevens Point. UW-Eau Claire officials said that references for Wilson at UW-Stevens Point never told them about the sexual misconduct complaints. UW-Stevens Point officials also never revealed the second complaint against Wilson in responding to public records requests and questions about his past UW-Stevens Point spokeswoman said Monday that they could not comment for this story because the person responsible for handling personnel-related concerns was out for the rest of the week. As a result, university officials were unable to answer questions about what they had done to investigate the second claim and who knew about those accusations. UW-Eau Claire officials did not respond to a similar request for comment. Wilson denied the allegations from the second UW-Stevens Point complaint when confronted by UW-Eau Claire investigators, according to UW-Eau Claire documents. Allegations of words and deeds Wilson's former co-worker at Stevens Point said that he made a series of what seemed like benign comments complimenting her haircut and dress and may have massaged her or hugged her once in 2014. In January 2015, his behavior escalated and became more inappropriate, she wrote. His comments and inappropriate behavior became so frequent that she couldn\u2019t recall the last time he didn\u2019t say something or do something vulgar tried remembering when the last day was when did not hear a lewd comment from him and couldn\u2019t remember. It was a turning point where paid attention,\u201d she told investigators. \u201cHis behavior was so predictable at that point that it was a daily occurrence.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:35 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment: Shawn Wilson accused three times 2/5 Her accusations against Wilson included: \u25ba He would comment about how good her body looked in a certain dress each time she wore it to work, sometimes saying, \"You\u2019re wearing my favorite dress.\u201d \u25ba He once pulled on the strap on the dress to look at her bra color. He did this another time while she was wearing a different top, she said. He once asked her what her bra size was and \"actually guessed my bra size,\u201d she said. \u25ba She said on multiple occasions Wilson would also intentionally walk behind her down a hallway and made comments that included \u201cliking the scenery like watching you walk down the hall\u201d and \u201cdamn, that (expletive).\u201d Wilson would also make comments about how much he liked watching her write on a board. \u25ba On one occasion, the woman said he said \u201cYou must be cold.\u201d When she was confused, he repeated the statement while staring at her chest. \u25ba On other occasions, she said he made comments about how he wanted to bend her over his desk and have sex with her. He would make lewd hand and thrusting gestures while making the comment, she said. \u25ba She said he would remind her how lucky her husband was and that he wanted her to consider Wilson if she ever separated from her husband. \u25ba She said he would also make suggestive vocalizations \u2014 grunting and \u201cmmmm\u201d \u2014 as the two would talk during meetings. \u201cIt\u2019s hard to describe these in writing,\u201d she said. \u25ba Throughout 2015, she said, he touched her on multiple occasions. At least a half a dozen times he closed a door or blocked the doorway to make her hug him. She said twice Wilson walked past her, as if he was trying to get around her, to intentionally rub his body across her breasts and say \u201cOops, sorry.\u201d She said he would put his fingers in her hair. The woman said she met with Wilson for an off-campus lunch after UW-Stevens Point placed him on paid leave amid its investigation into the August 2015 move-in weekend incident. She said she wanted to hear from him what was going on. This was before she reported his conduct toward her. During the lunch, he told her that he was accused of making suggestive comments to another female employee. He described the behavior and denied it all. 2/22/25, 10:35 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment: Shawn Wilson accused three times 3/5 \u201cHe asked me if thought those were the kinds of things thought he would say,\u201d she wrote didn\u2019t know how to respond so don\u2019t remember saying anything in response.\u201d After she had this conversation with him, he said something to her she would never forget, she wrote. \u201cYou have the nail to my coffin, and you know it. Right?\u201d she recalled Wilson saying. RELATED: Former UW-Stevens Point official also accused of sexual misconduct at UW-Eau Claire RELATED: UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment case spurs System to review hiring policies Back from suspension Nothing changed, she said, after Wilson submitted his resignation in October 2015 following a UW-Stevens Point investigation that found he violated university policy in connection with the first woman's complaint. Wilson was allowed to return to work after his paid leave and before his resignation took effect in January 2016. The woman said she had less contact with Wilson during that period, but that his behavior continued. UW-Eau Claire's human resources director, David Miller, alerted UW-Eau Claire officials about the misconduct investigation and allegations from after he became aware of them in October 2017, according to a memo from UW-Eau Claire's affirmative action officer Teresa O'Halloran. Wilson told investigators that some of the incidents reported by the Eau Claire student employee were taken out of context, and that some never happened. He denied everything related to the second complaint from UW-Stevens Point, the one from his former co-worker. \u201cHe flatly denied any and all of those statements and behaviors, and adamantly denied ever touching another employee at Point,\u201d wrote Teresa O\u2019Halloran, UW-Eau Claire\u2019s affirmative action officer and Title coordinator. 2/22/25, 10:35 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment: Shawn Wilson accused three times 4/5 Investigators at UW-Eau Claire found that the student's complaint was credible because it shared similarities with the misconduct alleged by both women at Stevens Point. \u201cWilson\u2019s version of the events differed from (redacted) and from (redacted find that weighed along with the similarity of some of the allegations, the facts stated by (redacted) and (redacted) were more credible than Wilson\u2019s denials,\u201d O\u2019Halloran wrote in an October 2017 memo to UW-Eau Claire Chancellor James Schmidt. O\u2019Halloran wrote that Wilson should be fired believe that the prior behavior along with the sensitive issues and vulnerable students that Wilson\u2019s job here involves increases the potential liability UW-Eau Claire would carry by continuing to employ Wilson,\u201d O\u2019Halloran wrote. O\u2019Halloran issued the memo Oct. 25, 2017, and notified Wilson of her findings that same day. He resigned in lieu of termination on Oct. 26, 2017. Wilson also worked at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, for about a year before going to UW-Eau Claire. Officials at the private college said they would not comment on personnel matters and why he left. At all three universities, his job duties included addressing gender discrimination issues. RELATED: Sexual harassment of students at campuses: What we know 2/22/25, 10:35 UW-Stevens Point sexual harassment: Shawn Wilson accused three times 5/5"} |
8,420 | Joseph Petry | University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign | [
"8420_101.pdf",
"8420_102.pdf",
"8420_103.pdf",
"8420_104.pdf"
] | {"8420_101.pdf": "allegations/article_fb5d623a-32d8-5367-aad7-809e90c12e2b.html professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations By Julie Wurth [email protected] May 9, 2019 \u2014 Saying he wants to \"set the record straight,\" a University of Illinois economics professor is responding in detail for the first time to sexual-harassment allegations raised publicly online. Joseph Petry, who is under investigation by the UI, admitted he used poor judgment by sharing photos and having \"communications of a social nature\" online with a former student, but he insists it was consensual and he did not violate any policies. Petry is also denying more explosive allegations that he offered to improve a student's grade in exchange for \"sexual favors 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 1/6 \"This allegation is not true, and want to set the record straight,\" Petry said in a statement released by his attorney late Tuesday, after News-Gazette Media inquired about the allegations posted by senior Summer Sundas Naqvi on her Facebook page Sunday. Previously, they had only been posted anonymously on Reddit. According to Petry, the interactions are the subject of an investigation by the university that prompted him to be placed on leave Feb. 4, when he says he learned of the allegations. The has confirmed the investigation is ongoing but refused to comment on most aspects of the case. The News-Gazette's attempts to reach Naqvi for a response to Petry's statement were unsuccessful Tuesday and Wednesday. She was arrested Tuesday along with a roommate and charged with intimidation and aggravated unlawful restraint for allegedly threatening another man with a knife so they could delete information from his computer. Her attorney in the criminal case, Tom Bruno, said he could not respond to Petry's statement on her behalf, as he hasn't spoken to her about the harassment case. But he said earlier that \"all this started\" because she had been victimized by a university employee, and \"it has caused a great deal of disruption in the life of an otherwise exemplary student.\" * * * * * In her Facebook post Sunday, Naqvi identified herself as the student behind the anonymous April 9 Reddit post accusing Petry of sexual misconduct. She said Petry \"relentlessly\" sent her messages and photos and encouraged her to send pictures back, offered \"sex in exchange for an A+ in his class,\" and even offered to pay her to have sex with him 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 2/6 She said she had shared photos and texts with police last fall and criticized the for allowing him to continue teaching until February, saying he could have harassed other female students during that time. She said other women have contacted her since the Reddit post with similar stories about Petry. This Facebook post is no longer available. It may have been removed, or the privacy settings of the post may have changed. Help Centre In his statement, Petry did not name Naqvi but did not deny having \"an interaction with the student in question after meeting on an internet social media platform\" last September. But he said it didn't take place until nine months after she completed his course in late 2017, and he didn't know when they started communicating socially that she was a former student, though he eventually did. He said his classes average more than 1,000 students each semester, and he didn't recognize her. 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 3/6 Petry said any messages sent through the unnamed internet platform or texts were \"always consensual.\" He said she asked him to send her pictures via Snapchat, assuring him that they disappear so it would be \"safe to use.\" \"At no point did demand sex from her, and at no time did offer to change her grade, nor did ever do so,\" he said. His statement does not admit to a sexual relationship and indicates they met only once They met in person in his office in late September, he said, several days after the initial communication. At that point, he said, it became clear to him that she was \"focused on convincing me to change her grade from the prior year, or to provide assurance that, if she retook my class would give her an said was not willing to do either of those things,\" Petry said, adding that she left the office, and he didn't hear from her again. He said he was told the student claimed she came to his office as a \"typical student inquiring about her grades, and that thereafter began sending harassing photos to her without permission.\" But he said their first contact on social media was before their in-person meeting, claiming that proved any exchange of photos was \"consensual.\" * * * * * The university does not currently have a policy regulating consensual relationships between faculty members and students, though it is \"in the process of developing one,\" spokeswoman Robin Kaler said. Petry also said the has examined grade changes he made over the past few years, and it did not find anything \"suspicious.\" That could not be independently confirmed with the UI; Kaler said the university can't comment on an ongoing investigation. The \"evidence does not support a violation of university policy,\" Petry said. 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 4/6 But he expressed \"sincere regret that my participation on this internet platform was the start of events that eventually led to my retirement exercised poor judgment and placed myself in a compromising position harmful to many \"The toll on my family and me has been immense, both personally and professionally. My actions have been far below the standards that hold for myself, and for this am profoundly sorry first and foremost to my wife, but also to the others who have been negatively affected,\" Petry said. In the Facebook post, Naqvi said she initially posted the information on Reddit because the university had told students that Petry was on emergency family leave, and she was worried other students could be harassed. She said that she was encouraged by her sister and close friends to come forward to make a complaint was unsure about reporting this to the police because he was a well-liked figure at the university and had previously (run) for mayor of Champaign as well am thankful that had this support because would've never spoken up about the issue without it, and Joe Petry would still be a professor at the university,\" she wrote. She initially had no desire to be publicly linked to the story, according to the Reddit post. But the thread went viral, and last week, Naqvi included a link to an email exchange with a lawyer that included her last name as proof that the investigation was still active. * * * * * In her post, Naqvi said other women have sent her messages on Reddit and other social-media platforms saying they had been harassed by Petry in similar ways, and she said some have come forward to the UI. University officials would not comment on whether they have received other complaints 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 5/6 Julie Wurth Reporter/Columnist Petry did not address questions about other allegations in his statement. His attorney, John Thies, declined to respond to those claims or expand on Petry's statement. \"Professor Petry felt it was important to set the record straight on a number of points,\" Thies said. Naqvi also said she had received online messages from Petry's family or friends, which she reported to police, urging her to \"be silent about the matter.\" She shared an email on Reddit from a investigator acknowledging that those contacts were inappropriate. Naqvi said the experience has made her senior year \"pretty distressing\" but expressed relief that Petry would no longer be teaching at the UI. She said she was proud that she had spoken up and for \"protecting other girls/future students from his actions.\" She signed the post, \"You are not alone #metoo.\" The Facebook post had been shared more than 330 times as of Wednesday evening. On April 27, Petry announced his retirement from the UI, effective May 31, as part of a resignation agreement he signed with the in exchange for the investigation being dropped. The university, however, maintains that the investigation continues and that Petry remains on leave. Documents show the investigation has been referred to an outside law firm 2/22/25, 10:36 professor admits sharing photos, denies 'sexual favors' allegations | News | news-gazette.com 6/6", "8420_102.pdf": "TaxProf Blog Tax Law News Scholarship Weekly Roundup Legal Education News Scholarship Weekly Roundup About Join the Network Advertise Resources Monday, May 13, 2019 Illinois Econ Professor Resigns After He Admits Sharing Photos With Student But Denies Sex-For-Grade Allegation; Accuser Is Arrested On Related Charge By Paul Caron Chronicle of Higher Education, Student Who Accused Professor of Sex-for-Grades Harassment Is Arrested on Related Charge clinical professor of economics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign says the sexual-harassment investigation against him was supposed to end when he agreed to retire. The university contends the inquiry involving Joseph A. Petry remains open. But the dispute over his employment isn\u2019t the only puzzling development in the drama that has enveloped Petry. This week the woman who had accused him of asking her for sex in exchange for raising her grade was criminally charged, along with another student, in a bizarre incident that involved holding another student at knifepoint. The police said Petry\u2019s accuser, Summer S. Naqvi, deleted information from her former boyfriend\u2019s computer and phone while her friend allegedly held a knife to the ex-boyfriend\u2019s throat. The ex-boyfriend wasn\u2019t physically hurt, and he told the police he believed the information Naqvi was after related to her harassment complaint against Petry. ... Petry, who was placed on leave in February, has admitted sharing photos and \u201ccommunications of a social nature\u201d with Navqi, a former student he met on a social-media platform. In a statement released through his lawyer on Tuesday, he denied offering to raise her grade in exchange for sexual favors. He said their communications happened nine months after the class had ended, and he didn\u2019t know she was a former student. That\u2019s not surprising, he said, because in a typical semester he has at least 1,000 students. Petry said that his communications with the student were always consensual and that she had asked him to send her pictures on Snapchat because \u201cthe pictures disappear on there and it\u2019s totally safe to use.\u201d He said that when he met with the student in September in his office, \u201cit became clear to me that this individual was focused on convincing me to change her grade from the prior year, or to provide assurance that, if she retook my class would give her an said was not willing to do either of these things.\u201d He said he didn\u2019t see or hear from her after that. The accusations against Petry came to light last month, when Naqvi wrote about them anonymously on the social- medial platform Reddit. On Sunday she repeated those accusations on Facebook, using her name. In her Facebook post she said Petry had \u201crelentlessly sent messages and pictures to me, attempting to solicit pictures back, sex in exchange for an A+ in his class, and even attempted to pay me to have sex with him. Even though came forward to campus police with evidence, including unwanted text messages and pictures in the fall of 2018, the university did not put him on administrative leave until months later,\u201d she wrote am disappointed that they would continue to let him teach during these months because other girls may have fallen victim to sexual harassment from him.\u201d Daily Illini, Petry Resigns Among Allegations of Misconduct News-Gazette Professor Under Investigation Says He'll Leave Job at End of May student-but-denies-sex-for-grade.html \u00a9 Copyright 2004-2025 by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy.", "8420_103.pdf": "files-7-9-million-lawsuit-against-ui/article_555f7236-e9ad-5bfd-9f52-0afd7b15455e.html University of Illinois Ex-professor accused of sexual harassment files $7.9 million lawsuit against Debra Pressey [email protected] Jun 12, 2020 Petry Provided \u2014 Former University of Illinois Professor Joseph Petry has filed a $7.9 million breach- of-contract lawsuit against the Board of Trustees in connection with his 2019 resignation agreement. The lawsuit, filed Thursday in the Illinois Court of Claims, accuses the board of violating the terms of the resignation agreement signed in April 2019, according to Petry\u2019s attorneys at the Urbana law firm Webber & Thies. 2/22/25, 10:36 Ex-professor accused of sexual harassment files $7.9 million lawsuit against | University-illinois | news-gazette.com 1/4 The agreement provided, in part, that in exchange for Petry\u2019s resignation, the Office of Access and Equity would discontinue its investigation into all allegations made against him, the law firm said \u201cWithin days of the university making this promise, it sought to renegotiate its agreement to permit the continuation of its investigation,\u201d the law firm said. \u201cWhen Professor Petry did not agree to such a change, the university ignored its legal obligation and continued the investigation anyway spokeswoman Robin Kaler said Thursday she knew nothing about the lawsuit and would have to see it and run it by university attorneys. The one-count breach-of-contract complaint states that the UI\u2019s investigation of Petry arose from false claims made by a former student he had sexually harassed her. The allegations \u201cwere fabricated and the result of a student\u2019s failed attempt to blackmail Petry into changing her grade,\u201d the lawsuit states. Petry\u2019s lawyers contended that despite the university\u2019s familiarity with problems with the student\u2019s claim, the investigation into Petry continued for nearly a year before the acknowledged that the student\u2019s accusations weren\u2019t credible and that the university\u2019s sexual- harassment policy hadn\u2019t been violated. 2/22/25, 10:36 Ex-professor accused of sexual harassment files $7.9 million lawsuit against | University-illinois | news-gazette.com 2/4 Regardless of this conclusion, the expanded the investigation to consider whether Petry had violated a separate policy, its Code of Conduct, and reported a conclusion that Petry had violated that code, his lawyers said. \u201cBy deliberately breaching the agreement and proceeding with its investigation, the university appears to have placed a priority on avoiding criticism that it was weak on claims of sexual harassment, no matter how meritless the allegations and no matter how much it would damage a distinguished member of its faculty,\u201d said attorney John Thies. \u201cProfessor Petry did not deserve this treatment.\u201d As a result of the continued investigation, multiple news stories were published in print, on television, online and in social media, the lawsuit states \u201cProfessor Petry seeks to recover damages he has incurred as a direct result of the university\u2019s breach, including damages for loss of employment opportunities, reputational harm and mental distress,\u201d it states. Since resigning from the UI, Petry has submitted more than 10 job applications for academic positions and more than 30 job applications in the private sector, and none of the prospective employers \u201chas expressed meaningful interest, and most did not even respond to the applications,\u201d the lawsuit states. The bulk of damages Petry is seeking is for $5.2 million in lost wage claims based on what he anticipated earning from age 56 in 2019 to age 75 in 2038. The rest of the amount Petry is seeking includes $537,046 for the loss of an annual tax deduction for each year he would have been employed at the UI, $103,000 in attorney fees and $2 million for mental distress. \u201cIt pains me to sue my alma mater, an institution with which I\u2019ve been associated as a faculty member for 18 years,\u201d he said am far from a perfect individual, but this does not justify the university\u2019s utter disregard for its contractual obligations and the \u2018guilty until proven innocent\u2019 approach taken against me.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:36 Ex-professor accused of sexual harassment files $7.9 million lawsuit against | University-illinois | news-gazette.com 3/4 Deb Pressey Reporter 2/22/25, 10:36 Ex-professor accused of sexual harassment files $7.9 million lawsuit against | University-illinois | news-gazette.com 4/4", "8420_104.pdf": "The Daily Illini \u2022 June 24, 2020 \u2022 seeks-7-9-million-in-lawsuit-against-university/ Enter your email Select a newsletter Headline News \ud83d\udd14 Headline News \ud83d\udd14 Former professor seeks $7.9 million in lawsuit against University By Heather Robinson, Assistant Daytime News Editor On June 11, former professor Joseph Petry filed a 7.9 million dollar lawsuit against the University. The lawsuit aims to compensate Petry on damage following a breach- of-contract of his resignation agreement with the University back in 2019. In the fall semester of 2018, allegations of sexual harassment were made against Petry by former student Sundas Naqvi. Almost immediately following the accusation, the University was in question of whether or not the accusations were credible. In April 2019 the University entered a binding agreement with Petry in which the University agreed to discontinue investigation of the allegations made against Petry, and in return Petry agreed to resign from his position at the University few days after the agreement plan was executed, the University Counsel\u2019s office urged Petry to renegotiate citing pressure \u201cfrom above.\u201d After Petry did not agree to adopt a new negotiation, the University hired a Chicago attorney to proceed with investigation into Petry\u2019s private life. In May 2019 Petry admitted to sharing photos and having a social relationship with the former student but insisted their interactions were consensual. Get The Daily Illini in your inbox! Madeline Pierce Crowds gather on the main quad to enjoy the weather during Mom's Weekend on April 6, 2019. Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday. Press Box \ud83c\udfc0 Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Subscribe Thank you for subscribing! In addition Petry denied allegations of blackmail claiming that he would improve Naqvi\u2019s grade in exchange for \u201csexual favors\u201d. The University declined to provide comment on the announcement of the lawsuit. \u201cThe practice of the University is not to comment on pending litigation,\u201d said Tom Hardy, Executive Director of the Office for University Relations. John Thies, attorney for Petry at Webber & Thies, P.C. law firm, said Petry\u2019s legal team is awaiting the University\u2019s response to Petry\u2019s complaint. \u201cThe University is likely facing difficulty trying to deny the undeniable \u2014 that it breached its agreement with Professor Petry,\u201d Thies said. According to Thies, the damage for the breach will include at a minimum the loss of employment opportunities and severe emotional distress. \u201cBecause the University\u2019s breach has prevented Professor Petry from obtaining alternative employment (now and in the future), he is entitled to the compensation and benefits he would have been able to obtain for the remainder of his career,\u201d Thies said. \u201cHe is also entitled to remuneration for the pain and suffering caused by the deliberate and avoidable actions taken by the University.\u201d In the Bill of Particulars detailed in the press release from Webber & Thies, the claimed damages for Petry amount to a total of $7,894,191. This includes $5,254,145 in wages lost for future years of employment anticipated at the University, an additional $2 million in emotional distress as well as attorney\u2019s fees and annual tax deduction. According to the press release, Petry said he was the target of blackmail by his accuser and a \u201cdouble cross\u201d by decision makers at the University. \u201cIt pains me to sue my alma mater, an institution with which I\u2019ve been associated as a faculty member for 18 years,\u201d Petry said in the press release am far from a perfect individual, but this does not justify the University\u2019s utter disregard for its contractual obligations, and the \u2018guilty until proven innocent\u2019 approach taken against me.\u201d The University has yet to comment on the lawsuit. [email protected]"} |
7,752 | Thomas Sayers Ellis | University of Iowa | [
"7752_101.pdf",
"7752_102.pdf",
"7752_103.pdf",
"7752_104.pdf",
"7752_105.pdf"
] | {"7752_101.pdf": "Writers' Workshop professor still employed after classes canceled, reassigned Jeff Charis-Carlson [email protected] Published 7:15 p.m May 10, 2016 Updated 10:38 a.m May 11, 2016 Classes taught by a visiting associate professor at the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop have been canceled or reassigned, but he is still on the university's payroll. Thomas Sayers Ellis, an award-winning poet, is currently employed as a visiting associate professor in creative writing, University of Iowa officials confirmed Monday. He was appointed Jan. 1 with a salary of $50,000 for the semester. His faculty page is featured on the Workshop website, and his name is included in the university's online directory officials also confirmed that Ellis' seminar class, \"Problems in Modern Poetry,\" was canceled, and a poetry class with the same course number as his has been taught for the past eight weeks by poet Emily Wilson officials declined to comment on the cancellation or what provisions were made for the 16 students enrolled in the course. Wilson's March 21 hiring came one week before a March 28 Jezebel.com report that said Ellis was relieved of his teaching load following anonymous, online accusations detailing his alleged inappropriate behavior. Wilson's appointment is scheduled to end Saturday, for which she will be paid $10,000 officials neither confirm nor deny the report from Jezebel. \"We can confirm that we are looking into the situation and that we will proceed in a manner that is respectful to all parties spokeswoman Jeneane Beck said via email in March message sent to Ellis' listed email address was returned for having an \"unknown user.\" He did not respond to other requests for comment sent via social media. 2/22/25, 10:37 Writers' Workshop professor still employed after classes canceled, reassigned 1/3 Jezebel.com reports that Ellis classes were canceled after the advocacy organization posted anonymous statements from 11 women accusing Ellis of inappropriate sexual behavior. In an introduction to the March 6 post, the women explain collectively that the statements have been stripped of any identifying information. \"Given Ellis\u2019 prominence in the literary community, we believe the issues raised in the post are important for discussion,\" said Amy King of VIDA. King said her organization provided the women an online platform for their collective statements but played no role in collecting, verifying or editing the testimony. Removing a professor from teaching should be considered one of the most severe sanctions an institution can impose, said Anita Levy, a senior program officer for the American Association of University Professors. \u201cIf there is to be a suspension from teaching, it should be due to reasons of immediate harm ... and faculty body should be consulted on whether to institute such a sanction,\" she said. The process for investigating and acting on such allegations against a faculty member, however, may require more than a single semester. Because Ellis\u2019 contract was only for the spring semester, Levy said it seems likely that officials may have decided to \u201cwait out the clock\u201d rather than instituting dismissal procedures officials would not say whether any complaints had been filed against Ellis. \"Our complaint procedures, like those of the Iowa Civil Rights Commission and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, are confidential,\" Beck said via email in March. \"We have found that confidentiality protects the integrity of the process and also provides potential complainants the necessary assurance to report issues they might not report in the absence of that protection.\" It's unclear what policy or procedures, if any, were followed in the decision to cancel and reassign Ellis' classes. Formal investigations of allegations against a faculty member, if the complainant agrees, would lead to an investigation by the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, according to UI's operations manual. At that point, the accused employee would be informed of the allegations, the identity of the complainant and the facts surrounding the allegations. At the 2/22/25, 10:37 Writers' Workshop professor still employed after classes canceled, reassigned 2/3 end of the investigation, the office would issue a written finding to the Office of the Provost. The process normally is completed within 45 days, according to the manual. Any sanctions to come from a founded investigation would follow the faculty dispute procedures outlined elsewhere in the manual. \u201cThere shouldn\u2019t be a summary suspension on what looks to be anonymous accusations that may or may not be linked to students at the university,\u201d Levy said requires all its employees who work part time or more, including visiting professors, to complete sexual harassment training. Beck said visiting professors for the Writers' Workshop must follow the same training and procedures as other visiting professors on campus. Officials with the Iowa Writers' Workshop, which has long been hailed as the top creative writing Master of Fine Arts program in the nation, declined to comment on Ellis. Reach Jeff Charis-Carlson at [email protected] or 319-887-5435. Follow him on Twitter at @jeffcharis. 2/22/25, 10:37 Writers' Workshop professor still employed after classes canceled, reassigned 3/3", "7752_102.pdf": "\"The blog has made Glab into a hip town crier, commenting on everything from local politics and cultural happenings to national and international events, all rendered in a colorful, intelligent, working-class vernacular that owes some of its style to Glab\u2019s Chicago-hometown heroes Studs Terkel and Mike Royko.\" \u2014 David Brent Johnson in Bloom Magazine 09/03/2019 1 Doug Storm, emeritus host and producer of WFHB\u2019s Interchange, points out this piece in Jezebel, about a noted poet, an once-esteemed member of the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop faculty, who was accused by numerous women of inappropriate behavior. His name is Thomas Sayers Ellis. He\u2019d taught at Sarah Lawrence College and Case Western Reserve University. The author of the Jezebel piece, Jia Tolentino, called him \u201cbrilliant.\u201d Tolentino adds: He\u2019s charismatic and surprising, a protest poet, a real intellectual, unafraid to cause alarm. His style is enjambed, urgent, and rhythmically afire; in the late \u201880s, he founded the Dark Room Collective to promote writers of color, and he\u2019s been known as an activist ever since. In 2016, a number of anonymous women offered chilling testimony about Sayers Ellis\u2019s sexual proclivities. Apparently, acc\u2019d\u2019g to several of these women, he likes to dominate, is into mild S&M, and has engaged in episodes of stalking and harassment. After the accusations were published in VIDA: Women in Literary Arts, Sayers Ellis was bounced from the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop. Oddly, none of the so-called objective sources offering bios of him \u2014 Wikipedia, the Poetry Foundation, the Academy of American Poets, the National Book Foundation, and more \u2014 raise a peep about the scandal that cost him his job. Only VIDA, The New Republic, and a website called The Rumpus seem to take the scandal seriously. The New Republic mentioned the Sayers Ellis situation in a report on an overall atmosphere of male misbehavior at the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop, calling it a \u201ctradition [that] goes back a long way\u2026. The New Republic piece even refers to the sainted Kurt Vonnegut telling incoming faculty that undergrads should be off limits but grad students were ripe, as it were, for the picking at Iowa. Of Iowa, noted author Sandra Cisneros says of her time as a student there in The New Republic article: \u201c\u201cThe teachers were completely fucked up.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:37 Hot Air: Women\u2019s Places | The Electron Pencil 1/4 Both Tolentino\u2019s and The New Republic\u2019s pieces suggest men in artistic academia long have been grabby and entitled when it comes to trusting, naive young women sitting before them in classes. The overall idea is writers and other artists who teach in higher education facilities across this holy land often are celebrities in their fields, honored and even adored by youthful, hopeful students who thus are prone to fall for their guy bullshit and get involved sexually or romantically (or both) with them or who find it extremely difficult to cope with the men\u2019s bullying ways and pushy, oafish passes. Being a guy can understand how the daily parade of young, attractive females in a college or university setting can make a middle-aged fellow think certain thoughts. And I\u2019d suppose an honest, symmetrical relationship can indeed develop and even flourish between professor and student, as long as she\u2019s of age. Yet too many of these old goats seem to want to till that fertile soil with their rusty old plows. And maybe they get off on being overbearing, power-wielding boors. Perhaps just getting down with a comely 23-year-old creative writing grad student isn\u2019t enough; it could be that these would-be Cougats need to oppress and/or humiliate their prospective partners mean, why in the hell else would a guy threaten a potential romantic/sexual partner with poor grades or lousy references? The sane among us realize such extortion rarely endears the object of one\u2019s desire to one. That power dynamic seems all too prevalent in all fields where men and women work together. And, sadly, too many of those fields have evolved a workplace paradigm wherein the only women who can get ahead, as a rule, are subservient, worshipful, and obsequious. To wit: I\u2019ve recently read a couple of books written by women who worked in anonymous-type jobs at the New Yorker. One, Between You & Me, by Mary Morris, is the author\u2019s tale of working as a copy editor at the magazine. The other, The Receptionist, by Janet Groth, is a memoir covering the author\u2019s stint in the title position there. Maybe it\u2019s just the New Yorker, but doubt it. In any case, both authors gush about the males with whom they work to a point where wanted to cringe. In fact wasn\u2019t even able to finish either book because found myself so put off by the slavish hosannaing of the authors vis-a-vis the deific men for whom they emended copy or took messages. Both women were \u2014 are \u2014 excellent writers but to hear them tell it, they could never, ever, ever, in this world or the next, begin to dream to approach the lordly men who, in their fetishistically humble opinions, were to the writer\u2019s art as Einstein was to 20th Century physics or Jesus Christ to the Roman Catholic Church. Before tossed either book to the side continually wondered if any woman with a hair\u2019s-width less idolatry of the strutting, pompous male asses with whom the two shared office air would have lasted a fraction as long as they did at the New Yorker. Based on what learned from both Morris and Groth, I\u2019d have to guess the answer is no woman with a sense of self-worth and a full compliment of confidence would have lasted more than an hour and a half there. Considering the revelations about workplace dynamics the last few years in every walk of life, I\u2019d have to conclude further the average American \u2014 both male and female \u2014 expect women to dote upon the males with whom they work and to display, properly, a sense of inferiority to them. Want more proof? In 2016 a woman stood up and said she wanted to be President of the United States. She said it loudly and in a deep, forceful voice. She didn\u2019t ask for it. She said, flat out want it. For a nation that only twenty-some years before had seen its most notable woman, one nearest 2/22/25, 10:37 Hot Air: Women\u2019s Places | The Electron Pencil 2/4 Select Month One thought on \u201c One thought on \u201cHot Air: Women\u2019s Places Hot Air: Women\u2019s Places\u201d\u201d Leave a Reply \u2190 Previous post Next post \u2192 the locus of power, Nancy Reagan, gaze rapturously at her husband, the President, as if there could be no more delicious and achievable aspiration in this existence than to be a First Lady, Hillary Clinton\u2019s ambition and refusal to play second fiddle must have been a kick in the balls. Yeah, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. And yeah, there were 23 and a half other reasons why she came up short in the Electoral College tally, but surely up to tens of millions of votes against her were driven by the feeling that she didn;t know her damned place. I\u2019m guessing things\u2019ll be different in 2020 should Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren or any other woman gain the Democratic nomination to run against the most lunkheaded creep ever to occupy the Oval Office since Andrew Jackson. It\u2019s entirely possible Hillary Clinton had to take the bullet for all future female presidential candidates three years ago and now that the first one\u2019s been put in her place, maybe we can look at the next one with a tad less terror. Or maybe I\u2019m just whistling past the graveyard. Time will tell. \u25b2 Mark Taylor says: The April 2\u2019nd, 2018 New Yorker magazine contained a stunning investigative report about the \u2018new\u2019 EPA, written by Margaret Talbot; if you have not read this article highly recommend it have to disagree with what seems like a pretty potent general disparagement of the New Yorker magazine, and the women who work there admit that am a little biased towards it; as a teenager, my Mom and Dad often showed me some of the excellent, cerebral cartoons it became so well known for, which led me, in my adult years, to also come to appreciate many well-written pieces the magazine featured on a myriad of subjects think a more accurate assessment would have to include opinions from long-time female contributors like Margaret, who has been a noted staff writer there since 2004. Thanks. Reply 09/03/2019 at 10:48 pm Loading... 2/22/25, 10:37 Hot Air: Women\u2019s Places | The Electron Pencil 3/4 Powered by WordPress.com. 2/22/25, 10:37 Hot Air: Women\u2019s Places | The Electron Pencil 4/4", "7752_103.pdf": "The poet Paul Engle with a group of Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop students in the 1950s. (Frederick W. Kent Collection/University of Iowa Libraries) Maggie Doherty / April 24, 2019 Your inbox is your home page, and The New Republic makes it smarter. Sign up now for your free newsletter. In March 2016, the literary organization published a series of anonymous statements that accused the poet Thomas Sayers Ellis of predatory and abusive behavior. The collected accounts allege unwanted advances, mockery, physical violence, and threats to ruin women\u2019s careers over several years. Fifty-two years old at the time and widely respected in the field, in January that year Ellis had been appointed a visiting professor at the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop. Soon after published these voices, Ellis\u2019s classes were canceled, and a university official confirmed they were \u201clooking into the situation.\u201d The case was a now-familiar mix of multiple accusations, whisper network support, and a critique of the ways that structures of power can enable abuse and prohibit clear expressions of consent. Call it a #MeToo coup avant la lettre. 0:00 / 0:00 Unfinished Work How sexism and machismo shaped a prestigious writing program 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 1/12 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 2/12 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 3/12 Reporting on the Ellis accusations, Jia Tolentino called \u201ctroubling behavior from powerful men in creative fields\u201d a \u201ctradition.\u201d This tradition goes back a long way at Iowa, perhaps the most prestigious writing program in the United States. The first degree-granting creative writing program in the country, the Workshop accepts only a tiny portion of those who apply (around 3.7 percent in 2016) and promises high rewards. Agents come to Iowa City to scout talent; faculty members connect students with editors; famous visiting writers admit students into their coteries. Eighteen Iowa graduates have won the Pulitzer Prize, and thousands more have published books, often to critical acclaim. The faculty is similarly accomplished. But some of these accomplished teachers are the very same people who harass, intimidate, and shun. Tolentino\u2019s reporting suggested that Ellis\u2019s alleged behavior was especially distressing to students at Iowa because it recalled stories about other poets and teachers at the Workshop over the years sample of incidents from the Workshop\u2019s illustrious, 83-year history: In the 1960s, the writer Kurt Vonnegut, then a faculty member, suggested to a new hire that the latter avoid seducing undergrads, but he implied that grad students were fair game; he also admitted to having \u201cinterfer[ed] with a student\u2019s clothing,\u201d to use his words. The poet John Berryman groped a student in the back seat of a car, en route to a party, and then balked when she tried to brush him off. (\u201cWhat? You mean you don\u2019t fuck?\u201d) There were sexual solicitations, quid pro quo exchanges, and drunken brawls, often over a woman. \u201cThe teachers were completely fucked up,\u201d the writer Sandra Cisneros said of her time there in the late 1970s. \u201cThey seemed to think that free booty was part of their compensation package.\u201d Exposing sexism is not the stated purpose of David O. Dowling\u2019s new book Delicate Aggression: Savagery and Survival in the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop. That, according to the introduction, is to examine \u201cthe impact of the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop on literary by David O. Dowling Yale University Press, 440 pp., $35.00 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 4/12 culture and the publishing industry\u201d by narrating the careers of important contemporary authors who taught or studied there under a series of distinctive directors, from its founding to the present. The impact is certainly profound: In 15 brief biographies, Dowling demonstrates how many of the twentieth century\u2019s most celebrated American authors shaped this institutional setting and were shaped by it. He shows too how deeply entwined the Workshop and the publishing industry have been since the 1940s\u2014it is no accident that so many books reviewed in The New York Times bear the imprimatur of Iowa. The poet Paul Engle, who took over the directorship of the Workshop in 1941, emphasized professional development; over more than two decades at the helm, he worked tirelessly to secure prize money and corporate sponsorship for individual students and for the program as a whole. The goal for students in the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop is and has always been to publish. Dowling is intrigued by the contradictions generated under Engle\u2019s stewardship, which he traces through the Workshop\u2019s later decades: How can writing be both pathbreaking and popular? Does institutional orthodoxy stifle innovation? How can one be a \u201cman of letters\u201d and a \u201cman of business,\u201d as Engle aimed to be? These questions have been tackled ably elsewhere, by scholars such as D.G. Myers, Mark McGurl, and Eric Bennett. What Dowling offers that is new, and important, is a thoroughgoing record of the varying ways sexism has shaped the Workshop experience. He has been through the literature and archives, and he has found a number of letters, interviews, and memoirs describing incidents of sexual misconduct. The book is heavily footnoted. (Dowling, an associate professor at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Iowa, follows academic practices of citation.) His book demonstrates how institutional sexism involves more than just discrete incidents of sexual harassment: It permeates a program\u2019s culture and expectations. Dowling relates anecdotes about boxing matches, the rampages of Norman Mailer, and the challenges of attending seminars while mothering two small children. He also tells of the aid that women writers offered one another, of their defiance of male authority, and of alternative workshops they formed in contradistinction to Iowa. There seems to have been plenty of savagery in Iowa City, but that same place gave rise to creative forms of resistance and strategies for survival. 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 5/12 book full of sad old literary men Delicate Aggression\u2019s first chapter focuses on a woman: Flannery O\u2019Connor, the Workshop\u2019s most famous graduate college graduate from Milledgeville, Georgia, and a devout Catholic, O\u2019Connor, who enrolled in the Workshop in 1945, was \u201cthe brilliant misfit\u201d in a class full of ex-GIs, men whom a classmate remembered as \u201ca pretty riotous bunch, very hard-living people.\u201d She dreaded reading her work in class and often asked a male classmate to read for her. When she did read aloud from what would become her first novel, Wise Blood, Engle was shocked at her description of a sexual seduction. Aiming to correct what he saw as inaccuracies\u2014stemming from what he supposed was \u201ca lovely lack of knowledge\u201d\u2014he called her into his office, then suggested they adjourn to his car, where she might feel more comfortable speaking about her own sexual history. O\u2019Connor went with him, but said nothing about her own sex life, nor did she revise her fiction. She went on to win the O. Henry Award three times and the National Book Award for fiction in 1972. Paradoxically for an institution designed to stimulate creativity, Iowa in its early years was pervaded by a martial spirit. Classes took place in former army barracks, and Engle, who kept a whip next to his typewriter, played the drill sergeant. He encouraged his students to criticize one another harshly, in the hopes that they would become resilient, even hardened, as if the Workshop were basic training. \u201cEngle\u2019s approach to bonding through preparation for a common enemy\u2014in this case the publishing industry\u2019s legions of potentially hostile critics and editors\u2014grew out of a Cold War mentality,\u201d Dowling explains. Culture was a weapon in the Cold War, and Engle was preparing the troops. O\u2019Connor, for one, didn\u2019t object to her \u201cex-mentor\u2019s\u201d teaching methods. \u201cEverywhere go I\u2019m asked if the universities stifle writers,\u201d she once said. \u201cMy opinion is that they don\u2019t stifle enough of them.\u201d Much changed between the 1950s and the 1970s. Along with the rest of the country, the Workshop entered what Dowling calls \u201cthe Age of Aquarius,\u201d a time of sexual liberation, revolutionary social movements, and lots and lots of drugs. More writers of color came to Iowa City\u2014Cisneros, Joy Harjo, and Rita Dove among them\u2014and there were more women in the student body school that once forbade \u201clong- hairs\u201d\u2014too romantic a look, according to the bureaucrat Engle, who forced students to \u201cshave down to clean professionalism\u201d\u2014now found itself hosting students such as T.C. Boyle, a self-described \u201chippie\u2019s hippie, and immoral to boot.\u201d There were still veterans writing about their experience of combat (Vietnam, in this case), but their 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 6/12 stories were now juxtaposed with other students\u2019 tales of hitchhiking and heroin addiction. What did not change was the culture of aggressive masculinity in Iowa\u2019s classrooms, restaurants, and watering holes. The Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Jane Smiley recalled, Many did. Dowling opens his book with an anecdote about a drunken fight between Berryman and one of his students, the future Poet Laureate Philip Levine, in 1954. Apparently, \u201cLevine\u2019s punch in the eye established a lifelong friendship with his mentor.\u201d He later recounts how the poet Dylan Thomas, on a visit to Iowa City, got into a fight with a woman and unleashed what one faculty member described as \u201cthe most elegantly strung together sequences of obscenities\u201d; Dowling calls it \u201cprofane poetry at its best, liquor-ridden misogyny at its worst.\u201d (Thomas\u2019s opening line was \u201cYou bloody fuckin\u2019 bitch!\u201d) John Irving, who first came to Iowa as a student and later returned as faculty, once used a wrestling move to tackle a prot\u00e9g\u00e9 of Nelson Algren\u2019s in an Iowa City poolroom, thus settling the question that dominated the Workshop in the 1960s: Who would win in a fight, the boxer or the wrestler? For a time, boxing was so popular that one student believed weekly sparring should be required\u2014\u201cfor the guys, anyway.\u201d Another would-be writer later memorialized a classmate\u2019s punch in a style that can only be described as Hemingway lite. (\u201cIt was a good, honest punch, a pure punch that tells you stories about yourself,\u201d etc.) As Dowling puts it, \u201cMailer, boxing, and booze all were essential to the locker-room ethos at the Workshop behind its one-upmanship and ongoing challenges, taunts, and self-aggrandizement.\u201d This \u201cmasculinist logic\u201d infected the classroom. Criticism had always been central to the Workshop experience, and it was harsh by design. Engle believed \u201cthat young writers overestimated their creative powers, a flaw that only astringent criticism could overcome.\u201d Cisneros put it more simply: \u201cThere was no love.\u201d The poet Robert Bly described how \u201cthe aggression went against each other,\u201d as students tore apart works in progress. Praise was uneven, and favoritism was everywhere. While male students like Boyle bonded with their advisers over drinks off-campus, \u201cfemale the teachers tended to be men of a certain age, with the idea that competition was somehow the key, the Norman Mailer period. The story was that if you disagreed with Norman, or gave him a bad review, he\u2019d punch you in the nose. You were supposed to get in fights in restaurants. 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 7/12 students were instead subjected to harsh scrutiny designed to test their will, a process rationalized as a pedagogical rite of passage.\u201d They confronted a test familiar to many women: Prove that you\u2019re tough enough, and you\u2019ll be counted as one of the boys. There was, of course, a second option: Attract a faculty member\u2019s erotic interest. According to Dowling, some women curried favor consciously, using their beauty and youth for professional gain. Others na\u00efvely entertained an older male writer\u2019s attention, believing that it meant something it did not. Cisneros, who attracted such attention from a professor during her undergraduate days at Loyola, later realized that she was na\u00efve to have thought \u201cmy teacher was interested in me because he thought was a good writer.\u201d She now warns young women to brush off any overtures from more powerful men. The male writers, for their part, saw these liaisons as rejuvenating encounters or simply as just reward. In a letter, Vonnegut described how \u201cwomen have the power to renew the ambition and wit of men adrift, and have done that twice for me\u2026. Both times, after sleeping with these angels started writing and making pictures again.\u201d In the same note, he pointed out that \u201cBellow and Mailer have renewed themselves in this fashion again and again, as though buying new cars.\u201d (It is difficult to imagine how one might competently teach students whom one compares to consumer goods.) Rumor had it that female applicants were admitted on the basis of their photographs female student who attended the Workshop during the \u201970s described women at the Workshop as \u201cunnecessary: decorative, not functional.\u201d Cisneros and Harjo, dismayed by the Workshop culture, banded together. They supported each other emotionally, materially, and creatively. Cisneros babysat Harjo\u2019s young children, providing her friend with time to write. She also encouraged her to write poems about the pressures facing her as an artist and a single mother. Together, they confronted an instructor about leaving them out of the weekly reading rotation. \u201cWhen that person saw us,\u201d Harjo recalled, \u201cthey started backing up, like we were going to pull out a switchblade or maybe scalp somebody.\u201d The next week, their poems went up for critique. There were other small acts of feminist resistance. Bored listening to yet another \u201colder male,\u201d Smiley passed a piece of work in progress to a female friend, who read it in the middle of workshop and gave Smiley the encouragement she needed to keep going. Cisneros defied the advice of Donald Justice, her adviser, and continued work 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 8/12 on what would become The House on Mango Street. In the 1970s, women founded a women-only restaurant-cum-library-cum-gathering place called Grace and Rubies. (Boyle wrote a satirical story about it; the story was published in Penthouse, and when the women came under pressure to admit men to their space, it closed in 1978.) Slowly, effortfully, the Workshop became a more diverse and more welcoming space. Years later, Cisneros reflected on her experience at the Workshop. \u201cIowa was an experience where found out what wasn\u2019t,\u201d she said, \u201cwhere discovered my otherness, and pulled myself away from who was studying with and the kind of poetry was reading to declare myself and what was. It made me very uncomfortable.\u201d Now a successful writer, she wanted to create a more collaborative workshop experience, something like the \u201ckitchen-table community\u201d her friend Harjo once described. In 1995, she founded the Macondo Writers Workshop. She held the first sessions around her dining room table. Later, the members drafted a \u201cCompassionate Code of Conduct.\u201d Cisneros believes that a teacher should be supportive, not sadistic, and that writers should think about how they\u2019re contributing to the world. \u201cMacondo is a workshop that gathers writers who are generous, compassionate, and believe their writing can make nonviolent social change,\u201d she explained. \u201cIn other words, the opposite of the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop.\u201d To be sure, there are many writers who found themselves at Iowa who felt nurtured, and whose writing was transformed. Dowling describes the careers of plenty of Workshop writers who responded positively to Iowa, whether as students or teachers: W.D. Snodgrass, Marilynne Robinson, Ayana Mathis. He also suggests that the writer Lan Samantha Chang, who took over the Workshop\u2019s directorship from the stern and uncompromising Frank Conroy 14 years ago, has impelled a \u201cprogressive cultural shift.\u201d Her appointment, Dowling argues, signaled \u201ca sea change in the gender and ethnic politics of the program,\u201d and it showed how Conroy, who directed the Workshop from 1987 to 2005, simply extended \u201cthe patriarchal dominance of the Engle era.\u201d Dowling characterizes Chang as a \u201ccompassionate\u201d and \u201cinclusive\u201d leader, and he notes that under her directorship, the Workshop has recruited more students of color. In stark contrast with the program\u2019s early years, Iowa today, like other 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 9/12 Maggie Doherty American universities, has implemented sexual harassment policies, and teachers there undergo sexual harassment training. The Workshop is not the only creative writing program, nor is it the only American literary institution that has been plagued by sexism\u2014several recent #MeToo scandals have made that perfectly clear. The experiences compiled in Delicate Aggression help us better understand not just the history of the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop, but more generally a literary history in which women\u2019s voices have been discouraged, ignored, or suppressed. Stories like Cisneros\u2019s are a too-little-known part of that history; so too are the stories of sexual predation, misogyny, and masculinity run amok. Dowling also points out that there are still many gaps in the official record, since Frank Conroy sealed his archives until 2024, and even though Dowling was given special access, the Workshop administration \u201cdetermined to remove an undisclosed amount of material from the file\u201d first. Dowling\u2019s book makes you wonder about the infamous 90 percent of Workshop students who don\u2019t make it as writers, about the causes of their discouragement, and about the books that might have been written. The author and critic Tillie Olsen, writing in the mid-1960s about the many silences of literary history, once mourned \u201cthe mute inglorious Miltons: those whose waking hours are all struggle for existence; the barely educated; the illiterate; women.\u201d She was thinking of those who never made it to a place like the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop, let alone to college. But her elegy for \u201cunfinished work\u201d and untapped creativity came to mind as read Dowling\u2019s book Delicate Aggression is a history and on occasion a celebration, but it is also a testament to the ways that women\u2019s creativity is often stifled and sacrificed in the name of men\u2019s success previous version of this article quoted David O. Dowling\u2019s account of Joy Harjo and Sandra Cisneros confronting an instructor. Dowling incorrectly described the instructor as male; Harjo did not state their gender. We have updated the text to reflect this. The article also stated that Joy Harjo and Sandra Cisneros \u201ctook to getting drinks\u201d before class. They did not. We regret the error. 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 10/12 Sponsored Content Maggie Doherty is the author of The Equivalents Story of Art, Female Friendship, and Liberation in the 1960s. Want more on art, books, and culture? Sign up for TNR\u2019s culture newsletter. Sign up Read More: Books & The Arts, Culture Programs, Books, Kurt Vonnegut, Flannery O'Connor, May 2019, Magazine, Norman Mailer There\u2019s Never Been a Better Time to Buy Luxury in the Northeastern U.S., Says\u2026 (Mansion Global Online Jobs in from Pakistan (Salaries Will Surprise You) (Search Ads 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 11/12 Which car has priority? 80% answer incorrectly! (Tips and Tricks [Pics] This Is Common in Dubai, And It Happens Every Day (Novelodge Dilapidated Castle Originally Built for Abercrombie & Fitch Founder Sells for\u2026 (Mansion Global Pakistan: The Cost Of Solar Panels May Surprise You(See Prices) (Search Ads 2/22/25, 10:37 How Sexism and Machismo Shaped the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop | The New Republic 12/12", "7752_104.pdf": "( 2495406397.html) The Globe and Mail ( galloway-scandal-sparked-a-canlit-civil-war/article33049536/) calls it a \u201ccivil war\u201d in the \u2018CanLit\u2019 community. The sexual harassment and assault complaints against award-winning writer Steven Galloway have erupted into a national debate in Canada, one that speaks powerfully to the persistent and lingering presence of misogyny and patriarchy in our creative and scholarly spheres Brief Re-Cap for Those Just Tuning In\u2026 Photo from KALW.org ( harassment#stream/0 Steven Galloway's sexual harassment case, and the literary establishment's response to it, reveals a lot about how much work still needs to be done in combating misogyny. By ( Rhea Rollmann ( / 5 January 2017 ( screaming- life-atr MCDONAGH) ( legendary- dance-rock- albums) 10 (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/1 ( hardcore- mid-2020s- resurgence MID-2020S HARDCORE-MID-2020S ( nyro- opened- window- soul ( come- ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 1/13 The case began unfolding in November 2015. Galloway (author of The Cellist of Sarajevo and The Confabulist, among others) was suspended from his position as head of the Creative Writing program at the University of British Columbia (UBC), located in Vancouver Canada, pending an investigation for \u201cserious allegations\u201d which were later revealed by media investigations to involve sexual harassment and sexual assault. The university tasked former Supreme Court judge Mary Ellen Boyd to conduct an investigation. The investigation was conducted confidentially and Boyd\u2019s report has never been publicly released. However, following its completion in April 2016 the university fired Galloway in June on the basis of that report. Although the report has not been released, nor the allegations made public, Galloway himself has admitted that one of the accusations was for sexual assault, and has also claimed that the only allegation which Boyd\u2019s investigation substantiated was that of a two-year affair with a student. In November 2016 fellow author Joseph Boyden wrote an open letter attacking for its treatment of Galloway and accusing the university of denying Galloway \u201cdue process\u201d; the open letter has been signed by over 90 of Galloway\u2019s prominent colleagues in the literary community, including Margaret Atwood, Yann Martel, Madeleine Thein, and others. The letter was posted on the website Accountable ( letter/steven-galloway-ubc/%20), which purports to be \u201cSeeking Clarity & Fairness In UBC\u2019s Handling Of The Steven Galloway Case\u201d. The letter, and its signatories, were in turn attacked by other writers and commentators, who argued the signatories\u2019 support of Galloway promoted rape culture and undermined efforts to combat sexual assault. (\u201cProminent authors face backlash ( letter-to-ubc-over-steven-galloway-firing.html) over letter to over Steven Galloway firing\u201d / \u201cWriters, Do Better ( / \u201cMargaret Atwood & Others ( Draw Criticism for Signing a Letter Supporting a Writer Accused of Sexual Assault\u201d) The open letter in support of Galloway even sparked a counter-open-letter in opposition to it. (\u201cOpen Counter-Letter ( steven-galloway-case-at-ubc? recruiter=53327227&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive) About the Steven Galloway Case at UBC\u201d) It\u2019s been widely pointed out that the dispute bears the marks of a generational rift, with a preponderance of older, established writers rallying around Galloway and a wave of younger writers denouncing them. It\u2019s divided progressive icons against literary icons, too: national progressive magazine Briarpatch ( terminated Boyden\u2019s role as judge of its annual creative writing contest after he penned the open letter. deliverance- ii-review ( book- reviewers- and- essayists COM) ( an-essay- review- interview- or-list-to- popmatters COM) ( seeks- music- writers- critics ( seeks-film- writers COM) ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 2/13 Galloway and his faculty union are grieving the firing. On 23 November he issued an oblique statement, in which he again claimed that the only allegation to be substantiated by Boyd\u2019s confidential report was one of a two-year affair with a student and that Boyd found \u201con the balance of probabilities\u201d he had not committed sexual assault (remember, the report has not been made public, so we have only Galloway\u2019s word for what it contained). The statement said he \u201cprofoundly regrets ( steve-galloway-apologizes-in-first-statement-since-being-fired-by-ubc.html%20) his conduct and wishes to apologize for the harm that it has caused.\u201d In response ( writer-steven-galloway-of-sexual-assault-issues-statement.html%20), the former student who filed a sexual assault complaint against him and who remains anonymous issued a statement through her lawyers, saying her complaint was not about a consensual affair. \u201cMr. Galloway has issued an apology. But he wouldn\u2019t appear to be apologizing for the finding he has admitted was made against him by Ms. Boyd, which was misconduct for \u2018inappropriate sexual behaviour with a student\u2019: conduct which is an abuse of trust and his position of power.\u201d Save the Writer? While the case continues to unfold \u2014 the grievance filed by Galloway\u2019s faculty union is now going to arbitration \u2014 the involvement of Canada\u2019s literary community has sparked a powerful and controversial national debate, with many younger and emerging writers rallying against those in the literary establishment who have closed ranks around Galloway. It\u2019s worth scrutinizing why so many established writers would put their own reputations on the line to defend him. Atwood in particular has drawn criticism, partly because some of her fans now feel the author of the feminist classic The Handmaid\u2019s Tale (among many other works) has betrayed the feminist principles they respected her for, and partly because unlike some of the original signatories who removed their names from the open letter following the backlash, she has actively defended ( her support for Galloway on social media and in unrepentant public statements. It\u2019s not surprising that a group of writers has rallied so quickly to the defense of one of their own. There\u2019s a long heritage of writers being persecuted for their ideas, and ostracized for pushing the boundaries of convention. Writers throughout history have challenged norms of gender and sexuality, opposed racism and colonialism, and expanded space for marginal viewpoints. Those writers and other creative producers who made it possible to hold progressive ideas and act upon them often paid a dire cost for challenging convention or defending unpopular ideas, from imprisonment to poverty to death. So rallying to the defense of an embattled writer is an almost instinctive response for many of us. So much so that these writers have missed an important distinction. Galloway is not being criticized for his ideas, or for defending a persecuted viewpoint. He\u2019s being criticized for what he is purported to have done \u2014 for his actions. The allegations are not that he inappropriately ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 3/13 stood up for the persecuted, but that he deployed his enormous privilege as a wealthy white male celebrity in inappropriate and abusive ways. He\u2019s not a romantic, poverty-stricken Victorian-era poet being persecuted for queer love. He\u2019s a rich white man being investigated over whether he abused his position of power in an elitist, white, masculine, heteronormative institution. The distinction is crucial. When authors have faced persecution historically, it\u2019s been for challenging structures of power: the Church, anti-Semitism, monarchism, heteronormativity. When authors face accusations of sexual harassment, they are being accused of something totally different: using structures of power to exploit others. The two are entirely different. The closer analogy would be that of a writer accused of being apologetic for a fascist regime. Because misogyny and sexual violence are part of a regime of power that has held sway for far too long. In the Galloway case, two of the spheres most prone to abusive and exploitative behaviour have collided: the university, and the creative field. This is not to say that other fields are profoundly more equitable or safe \u2014 the dearth of women in professional trades, computer programming, municipal governance, or so many other fields, attest to that \u2014 but that the university and the creative fields cling to particular values that make it extremely difficult to combat abusive and harassing behaviours. They are both fields where making inroads and success are incumbent on subjective approval of designated gatekeepers and informal support networks. Much like esoteric guilds of old, the blessing of an aged white patriarch \u2014 for they are still mostly old, still mostly white and still mostly men \u2014 can mean instant success; the withholding of a blessing can mean you\u2019re consigned to an uncertain and unlikely future. In the university, much as we try to convince ourselves success is based on merit, it\u2019s mostly not. Only a handful (a fingerful, in some disciplines) of substantive scholarships exist; these are key to having the time and leisure to pursue meaningful research, or to being offered a publishing opportunity with your name next to a senior professor\u2019s. These, in turn, are key to getting the slim chance at a lectureship; all of this is key to getting a slim chance at a tenure- track job. None of these rewards which open the gates of opportunity are really awarded based on merit, since no objective method for measuring merit in the higher levels of academia exists (some would argue that no truly objective method can or should even exist); they are all awarded based on the subjective approval of other, mostly senior scholars. Likewise the creative field. In literature, the chance approval of mentors gives you an \u2018in\u2019 with published journals or collections; a word of approval with a publisher gets you a book contract; a positive review means the book might actually get distributed. Again, established gatekeepers (and again, mostly white and male) play a key role, controlling the gates based on their very subjective tastes. Both fields purport to ground success in merit, and yes, there are occasions when this is true: when a runaway bestseller emerges on the strength of the text alone, or where a student stumbles into a scholarship on the basis of grades or equity considerations, rather than ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 4/13 currying favour with a prof. But they are still exceedingly rare, and both fields have tended to institutionalize reliance on gatekeeping mentors rather than work to create new systems that remove broad discretion and power from the hands of wealthy white men. All this generates a terrain that\u2019s extremely vulnerable to exploitation and abuse by those at the top. By rallying around him in the name of \u2018due process\u2019, Galloway\u2019s colleagues are more likely to have the effect of entrenching a system of power that disempowers the vulnerable. Galloway already enjoys the considerable protections and benefits of this system of power \u2014 he\u2019s a wealthy and successful writer who\u2019s merely lost one of his titles \u2014 and the bulk of the media attention swirling around him has stemmed from his colleagues\u2019 outspoken and controversial actions in his defense. The Notion of the Creative Genius There\u2019s another subtext bubbling beneath the surface of the Galloway case, and that\u2019s the notion that creative genius ought to be granted indulgence. It\u2019s the same sentiment that continues to generate sympathy in the artistic community for people like Roman Polanski or Woody Allen \u2014 talented creative persons charged with committing vile, exploitative and abusive acts. Galloway is not a romantic, poverty-stricken Victorian-era poet being persecuted for queer love. It\u2019s evident in some of the discourse surrounding Galloway\u2019s case. To be fair, many of those who signed Boyden\u2019s open letter emphasized (many of them after the backlash) that they were not speaking to Galloway\u2019s guilt or innocence but to the fairness of the process. Yet what ties them to Galloway is precisely his role as a creative writer; it\u2019s unlikely any of them had protested on behalf of other professors indicted behind similarly confidential sexual harassment tribunals. Coverage of the case has sometimes emphasized Galloway\u2019s idiosyncratically nerdy and creative personality. Kerry Gold, writing an article for The Walrus ( that sounds subtly biased in Galloway\u2019s favour, cites his colleague\u2019s depiction of a mercurial genius friend who watched Galloway\u2019s rise through the program described him as \u201cthe Steve Jobs of creative writing: entrepreneurial, driven, occasionally abrasive.\u201d He ran the department instinctually \u2014 \u201cmanagement by chatting in the corridor,\u201d says the same friend.\u201d Galloway himself has indirectly claimed the right to creative exceptionalism in his own literary work. He published his award-winning novel, The Cellist of Sarajevo, without bothering to obtain the consent of the actual cellist of Sarajevo himself, sparking angry outrage ( e6frg8n6-1111116651859%20%20) from the man on whom the novel was based \u2014 Vedran Smailovic \u2014 when he discovered his story had been stolen and co-opted (even altered) by Galloway. \u201cIt was like the explosion of an atomic bomb, emotions of anger and pain,\u201d he told David Sharrock with The Australian. \u201cHow is this possible? They steal my name and identity. Nobody can take the rights to that from me. It\u2019s quite clear that it is me in the book expect damages for what they have done, an apology and compensation.\u201d ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 5/13 Galloway\u2019s quotes in response are revealing. The question of whether writers should create fiction about living people without their consent is a whole separate subject for debate. But Galloway\u2019s comments reveal one thing: that he values his right to artistic license over his obligation to seek consent. It\u2019s not only in Galloway\u2019s case that writers have rallied to support their fellows. There are other examples of writers speaking out in support of other writers in cases of sexual violence and similar forms of exploitation. In 2008, Irish author Desmond Hogan ( boy-26461156.html) pleaded guilty to the aggravated sexual assault of a 15-year old boy. Award-winning author Colm Toibin submitted a statement in support of Hogan\u2019s character, which was read in court, describing him as a writer \u201cof immense power and importance who dealt with human isolation and whose work should not be underestimated.\u201d That may very well be, but what does this have to do with his sexual assault on a young boy? Toibin\u2019s intervention was criticized by the organization Children At Risk Ireland (CARI), as having contributed to the leniency of Hogan\u2019s eventual sentence (a four-year suspended sentence along with a \u20ac15k fine). \u201cThe perception is that if someone like Colm T\u00f3ib\u00edn writes a letter for you, you can end up with a suspended sentence. The perception for children is that can\u2019t go up against someone who has a reputation,\u2019\u201d said National Director Niall Muldoon ( But the creative genius defense was articulated most expressively last year by Bard College president Leon Botstein. Ken Kurson, in an extensive feature for The Observer, investigated the case of a Bard chemistry professor who was disciplined for creating a hostile work environment following the complaint of a lab technician. In his feature, Kurson is critical of the closed-door processes through which the professor was investigated, and more broadly of what he calls \u201cthe silliness of the microaggression movement would disagree with his conclusions, but his interviews with key participants are eye-opening. Leon Botstein, Bard President, defended the college\u2019s actions yet also commented on why more stringent action was not taken, and it is that which is most revealing. He states believe the University must go to grave lengths to protect great talent \u2026 Take the example of Albert Einstein. Albert Einstein was by all accounts a chronic womanizer, right don\u2019t think it\u2019s a good thing don\u2019t think it\u2019s a bad thing don\u2019t think it\u2019s anything. Do you follow me actually probably think on balance it\u2019s a bad thing, but it is who he was, and he\u2026 you always The problem is that Smailovic took a cello on to a street in a war and that\u2019s an extremely public act can\u2019t ignore that as an artist don\u2019t think that crossed any lines about writing fictional things about a living person got most of my stuff off the internet don\u2019t see how fiction writers can start paying their sources of inspiration would become a pariah of the literary world if were to do that don\u2019t even know if owe him anything on a fiscal level. \u201c ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 6/13 have to find a way\u2026 Beethoven was an irascible and abusive man shouting at everybody and with an horrific temper. My view is that deviancy and eccentricity are not neatly packaged. You cannot expect to have a brilliant scientist or great artist or great novelist be Ozzie and Harriet. It doesn\u2019t work that way. So we have to find a way to sustain the protection of great ability at the margins, which may come with it the unfortunate patterns of behavior which are not necessarily admirable. Later in the interview, he expands on this point ( star-professor-accused-of-calling-a-colleague-nigger-and-fag/%20): Here\u2019s the argument stated baldly: an argument in favour of exceptionalism based on talent, on genius, on brilliance. But where do we draw the line? How do we decide who gets to ignore or bend our society\u2019s rules and standards; our society\u2019s collective determination that it is not acceptable to use racial slurs, to demean queers, to sexually assault women and children? If the creative eccentrics and wise men get a free pass, do the wealthy as well? The royalty? The elected politicians? The police? Our employers? Exceptionalism based on creative genius or intellectual ability is just as egregious an assault on our society\u2019s social and democratic values, and moral sense of right and wrong, as exceptionalism based on any other criteria would be. If sexual assault and harassment are wrong, it\u2019s wrong no matter who does it. It\u2019s time for an end to the notion of creative exceptionalism. Yes, universities should be tolerant of eccentricity and non-conformity. But a consensus is emerging that this tolerance does not include certain forms of oppression, including misogyny and sexual violence. Closed-Door Tribunals Much of the criticism of UBC\u2019s handling of the Galloway case has \u2014 like Kurson\u2019s critique of the Bard case \u2014 centered on the use of confidential investigations. Kurson writes that during Bard\u2019s investigation, things \u201coccurred that would never withstand the heat of a cross- examination.\u201d America is a very conformist place, we want everybody to behave the same way and you cannot ask that of the University. In the University you are going to bring people who don\u2019t do ordinary things. They study quantum mechanics. They study the nature of the universe. They ask questions ordinary people going to work every day don\u2019t ask. They are writing poetry. They are writing novels. They are doing research about arcane aspects of medieval theology \u2026 looking once again at the texts of Sophocles. That\u2019s not what ordinary people do. They are not ordinary people and you can\u2019t necessarily ask them all to behave like your ideal, average citizen. They are not average citizens. You\u2019re not going to get Pablo Picasso or Virginia Woolf or, Lord knows, Georgia O\u2019Keefe. Forget the gender. Gertrude Stein. You\u2019re not going to get them to play by some kind of extremely puritanical restrictive rules\u2026 The University is finding a way in the current climate to protect the fact that we are in the business of institutionalizing and promoting the pursuit of knowledge and inquiry that requires exceptional talent and eccentricity. \u201c ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 7/13 How do we decide who gets to ignore or bend our society\u2019s rules and standards? Martel goes on to say that he has \u201cno love for the patriarchy and no interest in defending over- privileged white males.\u201d Yet so much of the language he deploys \u2014 \u2018impartiality\u2019, \u2018due process\u2019, \u2018transparent\u2019 \u2014 reflect a conventional understanding of \u2018due process\u2019 that\u2019s inflected with patriarchal overtones; reflect faith in a legal system in which a complainant who cannot \u201cwithstand the heat of a cross-examination\u201d (to quote Kurson) is invariably judged unreliable. As countless feminist activists have shown, this is not a paradigm that leads to justice in the context of sexual violence, which is a crime grounded in power relationships. To be honest, people are right to be suspicious of closed-door university processes. The corporatization of the university has led to an erosion of many of its traditional democratic practices in lieu of corporate managerialism, and yes, this is a trend to be decried and resisted. Unaccountable, closed-door decision-making laced with confidentiality clauses is part and parcel of the corporate neoliberalization of the university, and there is a strong and compelling case that it should be resisted. But that\u2019s not what\u2019s happening in the case of sexual harassment processes, and it\u2019s important not to blur the distinction. Closed-door managerialism is resisted by proponents of the open university because it concentrates power. Closed-door harassment investigations, on the other hand, are employed in an effort to undermine existing power imbalances in our society (i.e., sexism, patriarchy, misogyny); imbalances which can be exacerbated by exposing them to the mass judgement and mass opinion of a society which is still indelibly shaped by sexism, patriarchy, and misogyny. Even though the tactic is the same \u2014 removing the influence of the mass public \u2014 the goal is fundamentally different. There\u2019s no reason, therefore, why one cannot object to closed-door managerialism while at the same time supporting closed-door harassment proceedings. The latter seeks to empower the disempowered \u2014 women and other survivors of harassment and assault; the former seeks to further empower those already in power. As one commentator with a labour background has noted ( story_fbid=10154695409798555&id=678273554%20), demanding the sort of transparency which writers like Boyden and Atwood are calling for \u201cdismisses labour and privacy law. It insults the democratic due process of unions. It sets up a court of celebrity and demands a dangerous precedent: the release of private information that would erode Canadian rights and freedoms.\u201d \u2019Believe Women\u2019 \u2014 But on Whose Terms signed the letter because of two words: due process,\u201d wrote Yann Martel on the Accountable website student who has a complaint is entitled to due process, that is, to a process that is clear, transparent, impartial and thorough to deal with that complaint professor who faces an accusation is also entitled to due process. And last but not least, an institution is entitled to due process dealt with the Galloway affair in a manner shrouded in secrecy. There did not appear to be due process, and there certainly was no transparency. \u201c ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 8/13 At the heart of some of the controversy also lies a simmering conflict over the \u2018Believe Women\u2019 movement. This movement arose in response to what advocates argued was a legal system structured to give men accused of sexual violence the advantage. At its heart it is, as Stassa Edwards recently put it on Jezebel.com ( women-means-nothing-1787926657%20), \u201ca shorthand to implore listeners to disengage from a long history in which sexual assault victims were discredited, shamed, and denied.\u201d While the movement has garnered tremendous support, it has also generated opposition. Atwood\u2019s comments in The Walrus illustrated the more crass and unsophisticated side of this argument. \u201cTo take the position that the members of a group called \u201cwomen\u201d are always right and never lie \u2014 demonstrably not true \u2013and that members of a group called \u201caccused men\u201d are always guilty \u2014 Steven Truscott, anyone? \u2014 would do a great disservice to accusing women and abuse survivors, since it discredits any accusations immediately,\u201d wrote Atwood in response to the Galloway case. Atwood misrepresents what proponents of \u2018believe women\u2019 argue, which is not that women never lie, but that (a) the number of women who do lie pales dramatically next to the overpowering majority of men who are indeed guilty of the crimes they\u2019re accused of; and (b) that it does a disservice to point out that women lie when the demonstrably greater problem is women who fail to get justice when sexual crimes are committed against them. As Kate Harding wrote in her manifesto Asking for It: The Alarming Rise of Rape Culture \u2014 and What We Can Do About It, \u201cthe chief strategies we employ to avoid trying and convicting innocent people accused of rape \u2014 distrust of women\u2019s testimony, victim blaming, trivialization, and denial \u2014 neither prevent false convictions nor offer survivors of sex crimes any real hope of justice more provocative and nuanced critique was raised earlier this year by Jia Tolentino. In a brilliant and deeply thought-provoking article ( of-the-important-inappropri-1765684275) on Jezebel.com, she explored the case of Thomas Sayers Ellis, a poet and former professor at the Iowa Writers Workshop. Anonymous accusations of assault and harassment against him were collected and posted ( on the website of the women\u2019s literary advocacy group VIDA. The pieces were uncorroborated but powerful and damning. Tolentino\u2019s concern lies in blurring the line between journalism and activism. If a journalist were able to corroborate claims of harassment and assault, she argues, it offers an incredibly powerful blow for justice. Posting uncorroborated reports like did, she suggests, is a case of activism trying to claim the persuasive power of journalism, but without the more widely accepted standards of journalism. Therein lies her concern. ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 9/13 Tolentino produces a masterpiece of reporting, investigating the Ellis case and demonstrating through her own powerful work the type of journalism she suggests can be more effective in combating misogyny and sexual violence. But what ultimately emerges, as she notes herself, is a difference in perspective on how and on whose terms women ought to confront harassers. That, she notes, is where she and differ. Tolentino raises the very pragmatic concern that such methods, which blur the line between activism and journalism, could backfire in a broader sense. Our awareness of the prevalence and magnitude of sexual assault has outpaced the systems that expose and adjudicate it. It\u2019s incredibly difficult to match these two things up. But for activism to carry the authority of journalism \u2014 or for journalism with an activist conclusion to work \u2014 there are basic practices that can\u2019t be set aside. Noble goals can be quickly rendered immaterial: Rolling Stone should\u2019ve been enough to teach us that good intentions \u2014 that \u201cbelieving women\u201d \u2014 can end up hurting them dramatically in the end. And believing a woman, anyway, isn\u2019t the same as supporting her. Supporting a woman means strengthening her position, and the women who spoke to have been presented on shaky ground. We agree on almost everything: that the legacy of bad men in creative fields is onerous and near-universal; that it\u2019s terrifying that whispers about an important and inappropriate man can circle for decades without anyone doing anything; that any man who repeatedly takes advantage of his power over women should be called to account. We agree, even, that institutions have failed women so dramatically that we\u2019ve reached this particular state of things \u2014 where a deeply flawed but pragmatically essential hierarchy of systems is beginning to be reversed. We believe that the police system fails women, that the courts fail women, that institutions fail women. But on the next step, we differ, and significantly. VIDA, and many of the women who spoke to VIDA, believe that this \u201cguerrilla activism\u201d is the only option; that asking women to present their stories in any other way than the way they\u2019ve decided to \u2014 any other way than what makes them feel most comfortable \u2014 is infantilizing, and re-traumatizing, and asking too much, and wrong. This is a method of \u201cbelieving women\u201d that will contribute to a wider disbelief of women. Forget journalistic standards, even \u2014 if we move towards establishing anonymous accusation as a moral gold standard, it will weaken our position in the end\u2026 When the goals are crucial, the execution is even more so. We finally have people listening; we are finally in front of a set of wider cultural values that make it possible to end the era of the important, inappropriate literary man. And it\u2019s not fair in a larger sense that women bear the procedural responsibility I\u2019m asking for. It\u2019s horrifically unfair that so much more is asked of victims than rapists, who, as one blogger pointed out, get to be \u201canonymous guerrillas\u201d no matter what. But there is no righting that wrong through blurred methods, through asking informal testimony to bear an institutional burden. There is too much at stake here for a woman who comes forward to be put in the position where anyone could say \u2014 as people tend to, and as we continue to make possible, through a scrim of good intentions \u2014 that it\u2019s not quite clear what she\u2019s talking about. \u201c \u201c \u201c ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 10/13 Tolentino makes a far better and more thoughtfully articulated case for greater transparency than Margaret Atwood does. Yet it\u2019s important, too, to consider a point by Kat Stoeffel that Tolentino quotes in her feature. Stoeffel wrote a powerful article ( in The Cut in 2014 on rape scandals in the \u2018alt-lit\u2019 community. Toward the end, she poses a key question: What is it the women who present public accusations aim to achieve? If they were seeking to ruin the lives of the men they accuse, she says, they would press charges instead of just making public accusations. \u201cBut what it seems most women want is to warn other women about a category of jerk courts have no name for: a guy who can\u2019t be trusted not to exploit his power over her.\u201d Stoeffel\u2019s comment is particularly resonant in the context of the Galloway case. Tolentino and Stoeffel both highlight important aspects of the present dilemma: the legal system hasn\u2019t caught up to society\u2019s growing demand for an end to masculine and sexualized power. Indeed, the fact that our legal systems are so incapable of meeting the challenge posed by masculine, sexualized power indicates the degree to which they were shaped by men who accepted the exertion of that power as natural and acceptable revolution in social attitudes has occurred, but the revolution in our legal structures has not kept pace. What, then, are we to do? This brings us back to the Galloway case, and to the plight of campus sexual harassment tribunals such as that which took place at UBC. Because the one thing we can do is try to develop new methods of tackling masculine and sexualized power. Sexual harassment processes at universities are trying to do that. They\u2019re doing it slowly, stiltedly, and stumbling as they go. Some are doing it better than others. Too many are not doing it at all. But at least what we are seeing on campuses is the beginning of an effort to fill the gap around sexualized violence from which our legal structures currently suffer. University sexual harassment processes aren\u2019t perfect, but they at least are an experiment \u2014 an effort \u2014 to come up with a new way of tackling this problem that the legal system is so ill-prepared to tackle. Herein lies part of the damage Boyden, Atwood and the other writers are doing by attacking UBC\u2019s handling of the Galloway case. By rallying to the defense of their friend and colleague, and demanding some vaguely articulated Hollywood stereotype of courtroom \u2018due process\u2019, they are attacking University of British Columbia\u2019s effort to do the right thing. This is no paean to \u2014 it\u2019s an enormous, corporatized, monstrosity of a neoliberal university with atrociously high tuition fees and a campus that\u2019s sometimes been called the biggest construction site in Canada. But whatever its other faults, it\u2019s most determinedly not doing what the writers are accusing it of, i.e., behaving in a Kafka-esque fashion. What it is doing is trying, finally, to take seriously a problem for which no easy, widely agreed upon judicial solution exists. UBC\u2019s actions need to be considered in light of a broader backdrop. In November 2015 the school was the subject of a special documentary ( alleged-sex-assaults-report) about the institution\u2019s failure to respond adequately to sexual harassment complaints. At the time, it even lacked a sexual harassment policy. In this is ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 11/13 not alone 2014 investigation by the Toronto Star ( revealed only nine out of 78 Canadian universities surveyed had sexual assault policies survey by the Globe and Mail ( pressure-to-formalize-harassment-assaultpolicies/article29499302/%20) earlier this year showed that less than ten percent of harassment complaints on campuses even lead to formal investigations (less than one percent at some institutions). In early 2016 the reported on the shocking case of a student at Brock University in Ontario who was sexually assaulted by a professor and warned by her university ( sexual-harrassment-1.3485814%20) not to go public about it. The point is, UBC\u2019s taking the Galloway case so seriously is, sadly, the exception when it comes to Canadian universities, not the norm. The knee-jerk reaction of the literary establishment is not going to have the effect of protecting other writers from persecution which those writers seem to think it\u2019s about; rather it\u2019s likely to have the effect of causing universities to think twice before taking serious action in the face of sexual assault complaints. That is a far greater harm than the dented reputation of a rich and powerful white man Clearly Canadian ( Joseph Boyden ( margaret atwood ( Steven Galloway ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/GILMORE- GIRLS-SPRING-SHOWS-LORELAI-MOVING- FORWARD-RORY-FALLING-DOWN- 2495404212 \u2018NAPOL\u00c9ON Masthead ( Submission Guidelines ( Mission ( ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 12/13 Advertising ( Privacy Policy ( Facebook ( Twitter ( Instagram ( Spotify ( Music ( Film ( Television ( Books ( Culture ( \u00a9 1999-2025 PopMatters LLC. All rights reserved. PopMatters is wholly independent, women-owned and operated. ( utm_source=SMPN) (htt // t t b t d i f ) ( (HTTPS://WWW.POPMATTERS.COM/DONATE-TO-POPMATTERS-2648142361.HTML) \uf106 2/22/25, 10:38 The Galloway Case: Sexual Harassment, Due Process, and Literary Exceptionalism \u00bb PopMatters 13/13", "7752_105.pdf": "Is This the End of the Era of the Important, Inappropriate Literary Man? By Jia Tolentino ( | March 28, 2016 | 5:45pm 0 ( Paste Media ( ( music- fridays- february- 21- perfume- genius- patterson- hood- laura- jane- grace) A.V. Club 3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend ( music-fridays-february- 21-perfume-genius- patterson-hood-laura- jane-grace) ( albums/new- music Best New Albums: This Week's Records to Stream ( albums/new-music) ( and-elon- are- losing- popularity- take- notice-of- who-was- fighting- them-first Trump and Elon Are Losing Popularity, Take Notice of Who Was Fighting Them First ( and-elon-are-losing- popularity-take-notice-of- who-was-fighting-them- first) : In public, everyone says that Thomas Sayers Ellis, 52, formerly of Case Western and Sarah Lawrence, a visiting professor at the Iowa Writers Workshop this semester, is brilliant. Even the people who find him off-putting and unprofessional tend to agree. He\u2019s charismatic and surprising, a protest poet, a real intellectual, unafraid to cause alarm. His style is enjambed, urgent, and ; in the late \u201880s, he founded the Dark Room Collective to promote writers of color, and he\u2019s been known as an activist ever since. He attracts women; several women talked to said he had \u201cgroupies.\u201d But in late February, a group of women came together to say that he\u2019s abusive, that he preys. Their , collected and published anonymously by the advocacy organization VIDA, sent the administration and many students at the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop into private crisis. The program has a history of male poets becoming involved with students; a repetition of that history\u2014let alone a worse version of it\u2014wouldn\u2019t do. Immediately after the post, Ellis\u2019s classes were canceled, and by the time spring break was over, the week after the post went up, he\u2019d been unofficially replaced. rhythmically afire ( accusations ( Most Popular ( ( Still Without Airbrushing. Still With Teeth. ( Latest( Politics( Entertainment( Celebrities(https:/ Paste ( | A.V. Club ( | Jezebel ( | Splinter ( w.jezebel.com/search) News ( ( down-a- lawyer) Diddy's Down a Lawyer ( down-a-lawyer) ( virginia- gop- really- really- wants-to- remove- the-rape- exception- from-its- abortion- West Virginia Really, Really Wants to Remove the Rape Exception From Its Abortion Ban ( virginia-gop-really-really- wants-to-remove-the-rape- exception-from-its-abortion- ban) ( elon- musk-the- ld Is Elon Musk the World\u2019s Biggest Deadbeat? ( elon-musk-the-worlds- biggest-deadbeat) More News ( \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 The accusations against Ellis portrayed him as a familiar sort of figure. The story of the important, inappropriate literary man is so common and entrenched as to feel depressingly unremarkable. Women often circulate warnings about them in private, never sure what to do: they talk about incidents that are disturbing but often shy of criminally reportable, and they distribute warnings via hearsay, and they tell you they wish they, or their friend, or their friend of a friend, had known to stay away. There\u2019s the grabby lit mag editor, the wildly volatile critic, the author you hear once hit somebody, the professor who every year dates a first-year grad student and manages to send her reputation, not his, into the mud. In terms of artistic value, this man is often phenomenal, the type that can define and support an institution; in terms of his effect on half the women writers he encounters, this man frequently adds up to shit. The cultural landscape is set up ideally right now for women to speak out about this. Privilege and rape culture are phrases in common parlance; sexual inequity and assault are seen (finally) as an epidemic; social media allows whispers to grow into flames. In the most prominent recent example of testimony and catharsis becoming semi-official allegation, multiple women publicly accused the \u201calt-lit\u201d writers Stephen Tully Dierks and Tao Lin of rape, abuse and coercion in October 2014. The woman who first accused Dierks gave him a pseudonym on Medium, which other women on Tumblr linked to Dierks\u2019s real name; Lin\u2019s ex-girlfriend E.R. Kennedy (formerly Ellen, he now identifies as male) tweeted a story of rape that was picked up by Tumblr, \u201cliked\u201d by 7,000 people in a day, and noted by dozens of publications, Jezebel UNREMARKABLE. Megyn Kelly Gets a Taste of the Conservative Women Audience She\u2019s Spent Years Cultivating ( spent-years-cultivating) Here\u2019s My Best Attempt to Explain the Elon Musk/Ashley St. Clair Baby Drama ( drama) As Pressure Mounts for Dems to Do Literally Anything, Top Senator Simply Says, 'We Are Cooked' ( simply-says-we-are-cooked) Read More 00:00 00:00 including ( accused-of-horrific-rape-and-abuse-1641641060) Kat Stoeffel thoughtfully at the Cut: Now women are speaking up about situations that fall outside the conventional definition of rape but nonetheless reflect a gender power dynamic that leaves women sexually vulnerable. Katz never used the word rape, but her essay spells out many of the reasons women have sex when they don\u2019t want to. There\u2019s baseline need (she had nowhere else to stay), physical intimidation (he was on top of her), and, most insidious, a deeply internalized sense of obligation. Stoeffel\u2019s piece was titled \u201cIt Doesn\u2019t Have to Be Rape to Suck,\u201d and addressed one of the most fungibly interpreted aspects of this informal pursuit of justice. Why are women talking about, and accusing, the important and inappropriate literary man? To ruin his reputation? To remove him from employment? Not as a priority, Stoeffel concluded, and to my eye accurately. \u201cWhat it seems most women want,\u201d she wrote, \u201cis to warn other women about a category of jerk courts have no name for: a guy who can\u2019t be trusted not to exploit his power over her.\u201d But at some point, personal responsibility (validate women\u2019s experiences, keep your loved ones the fuck away) bleeds into institutional responsibility (tell your friends to fire him, to refuse to hire him, to boycott his class). What happens when the guy in question is employed by the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop, the most prestigious prominent writing program in the country? In Thomas Sayers Ellis\u2019s case, the stories about him have ultimately (if unofficially) removed him from his post. His case seems to suggest that we\u2019ve arrived at a new stage of this era. The important, inappropriate literary man is going to face his retribution. Or at least, certainly, the literary community is poised to bring him to some end. The first person to say anything about Thomas Sayers Ellis was Larkin Grimm, a vocalist and songwriter, who played with him in the band \u2014a collective of poets and musical artists organized by Ellis in the wake of the poet Amiri Baraka\u2019s death. On February 25, Grimm wrote a public Facebook post, claiming that a different man, Michael Gira of the band Swans, had raped her, and that what had prompted her to bring it to light was the fallout from an incident with Thomas Sayers Ellis experienced a traumatic incidence of sexual harassment in my band Heroes are Gang Leaders on February 6th and 7th,\u201d Grimm wrote, in a note that\u2019s now been aggregated or linked to on . \u201cThe band leader, Thomas Sayers Ellis, threatened to hurt me further if called him out publicly,\u201d she claimed. So have spent the last few weeks thinking it over, looking at my options. Many cases like this have been shared on Facebook and twitter lately do not believe in Facebook witch hunts or mob justice, and that is why decided to take this issue to a government agency. [\u2026] It turns out musicians cannot file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission because we are freelancers. Maybe this is why rape, assault, and sexual harassment are so common in the music world. wrote about the accusations ( suck.html) Heroes Are Gang Leaders ( essentially every website that covers music news ( instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=grimm+gira&tbm=nws) The rep, Grimm said, \u201curged\u201d her to \u201csee if there is anything you can do to help us protect women like yourself.\u201d Prefacing her statement with \u201cTwitter justice is not justice, y\u2019all,\u201d she continued saw this man, whose sexual advances had been calmly brushing off for months, abuse his girlfriend in front of 12 band members at Rutgers University in Newark on the night of february 6th went to speak to him afterwards wondering if he had gone insane. This was a man loved and admired. The next day was publicly humiliated in front of our audience at The Firehouse in Brooklyn on February 7th right before the show, verbally abused and threatened, and kicked out of a band that loved. Both these events had many, many witnesses. The post was by Brooklyn Vegan on the same day Grimm posted it, and it quickly made waves in the music world. That story\u2014concerning her statements about Gira, not Ellis\u2014was aggregated by , , the , , , and many more. The same day, Gira on his Facebook page that Grimm\u2019s account was a\u201cslanderous lie\u201d; through a spokesperson, he called the incident in question an \u201cawkward mistake.\u201d Grimm sent Pitchfork a , saying she had been incapacitated at the time of the encounter: \u201cIn a gentlemanly move he admits the act happened but cannot conceive of himself as a rapist. Thank you Michael Gira for your honesty. This is your truth as you remember it. Unfortunately, this was still rape.\u201d The truth, for a long time, was that no one wanted to listen to rape accusations. That still holds in many institutional contexts, but the world of media (starting with social media; search , and look at aggregated ( the Guardian ( Billboard ( response-statement) Village Voice ( sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=13&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjKupH- tcrLAhWGGh4KHVYLDB0QFghgMAw&url=http%3A%2F%2F grimm-accuses-former-collaborator-michael-gira-of-rape-update- 8325037&usg=AFQjCNGprfnGSqR6CAMMSa9ZICf29Sblgw&bvm=bv.117218890,d.dmo) Stereogum ( sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=11&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjKupH- tcrLAhWGGh4KHVYLDB0QFghSMAo&url=http%3A%2F%2F grimm-accuses-swans-michael-gira-of- rape%2Fnews%2F&usg=AFQjCNFHJvYIImoEWpj4gkf9WF13uNFYfQ&bvm=bv.117218890,d.dmo) Spin ( wrote ( rape-accusations-larkin-grimm-responds/) response ( accusations-larkin-grimm-responds/) #BelieveWomen ( how these accounts spread now) is listening up. Grimm\u2019s account was aggregated widely. And as it went bigger, the literary internet, which moves a few degrees slower, had seen Grimm\u2019s passing mention of Thomas Sayers Ellis and taken note. Ellis, again, is a unique figure. In interviews asked a dozen women who have known Ellis in various ways to describe him: they said \u201cgenius,\u201d \u201cegomaniac,\u201d \u201catypical,\u201d \u201cextraordinary,\u201d \u201cpunishing,\u201d exclusively extreme words like that. Within contemporary poetry, his reputation is large enough that several people talked to said the phrase \u201ccult of personality\u201d\u2014large enough that Ellis feels comfortable, according to a current student, referring to himself in third person during class. Respected men in the literary community are still almost never challenged in the open about borderline or far-over-the-line behavior; when they are, women respond with a pent-up force that feels electric. It\u2019s part of the reason Claire Vaye Watkins\u2019 Tin House \u201cOn Pandering\u201d was received with such gratitude and fervor: in it, she called out Stephen Elliott of The Rumpus for trying to get in her bed and then belittling her for it in his public newsletter. \u201cI\u2019m not presenting Stephen Elliott as a rogue figure, but as utterly emblematic,\u201d she wrote. Larkin Grimm had done this for Ellis, and so a group of women writers decided to act. The week that Grimm\u2019s Swans accusations were breaking, 11 women collected their accounts of varyingly intimate interactions with Ellis. Requesting anonymity, they sent these stories to , an advocacy organization best known for the Count, which tallies up the aggregate presence of women writers in major magazines at the end of the year. \u201cAfter Larkin\u2019s thing, they were like, \u2018You know what? As a matter of fact have something to say on this too,\u2019\u201d said a woman with knowledge of the situation, who knows Ellis through the residencies and conferences that delineate the literary circuit. She had no account to contribute; Ellis is an \u201cintense person,\u201d but she\u2019s never been harassed by him, she told me, and she doesn\u2019t like the idea of \u201callowing yourself protection that you\u2019re not allowing the person you accuse.\u201d Without contacting Ellis, on March 6 published the accounts as they were submitted, titling the post \u201c ,\u201d and prefacing the women\u2019s stories UP. essay ( pandering.html ( Report From the Field ( against-silence/) The following sample of de-identified disclosures are from women who have experienced traumatic interactions with a respected literary arts community member. In the recent weeks, we have learned the extent of his violations \u2014 a system of disturbing sexual and professional misconduct within and beyond learning spaces. The damage reaches back much longer than one decade and stops today. [\u2026] We begin our efforts with these disclosures of interactions with Thomas Sayers Ellis. We appreciate these women\u2019s strength in putting their stories in strangers\u2019 hands. Within hours after this post went up, a dozen people I\u2019d met through my program had linked to the article on Facebook. As read it felt increasingly surprised, and worried. It wasn\u2019t\u2014and whose fault is this\u2014the content of the stories: working at Jezebel and having spent much of my post-college time in one writing-centric community or another, it is unsurprising to me that any respected man in any enclosed community would be accused of being abusive, inappropriate, a creep. And it\u2019s also worth mentioning that, while all the stories describe some sort of distressing behavior, not all of them describe violence, and the \u201cde-identification\u201d means that crucial potential incriminating factors (a student-teacher relationship, an institutional context) are completely obscured. The first entry calls Ellis \u201cpredatory\u201d for lying to the writer about recommendations and giving off bad \u201cenergy,\u201d and the last entry is a diary detailing a consensual relationship that ends in slightly uncomfortable sex. \u201cHe hurt me kinda yesterday, rushing,\u201d the writer said. (When asked about the last entry, Amy King, on the executive board, wrote back, \u201cWe felt [the entries] illustrate the evolution of giving over power, of how manipulation evolves.\u201d) Rather was surprised at the gap between the aim of VIDA\u2019s post, which is unimpeachable, and the execution of the post, which was\u2014if you expect it to stand journalistically, which they told me repeatedly that they don\u2019t\u2014flawed was surprised by the words they used, too: \u201cde-identified\u201d for un- vetted and impossible to corroborate, and \u201cstrength\u201d for something I\u2019m still trying to figure out. \u201cStrength\u201d can work as both a feminist and literary tautology for the plain act of speaking. But the logic involved can get imprecise. When we\u2019ve called women strong for speaking out about trauma, it\u2019s often been because doing so has traditionally, and unfairly, been as difficult as (or more difficult than) enduring the trauma itself. What we\u2019re encountering here, however, is a sea change. It is a new thing that a woman could type out her story anonymously, attach it to a public figure\u2019s name, and know that an organization with a respected platform would accept it without context and publish it like this: He said let me fuck you there. One day will fuck you there said from there, on my body, things go out, not in said no. He said you are mine. He said worship you. He is not small screamed. He said it was an accident. You know it was an accident. Right kept silent. After the scream. [\u2026.] He paced barefoot in his accident speech in his unzipped khaki pants. Words bled from his mouth. Accident, accident, accident love you bled and cleaned and shook think it was late fall. Bald trees and pale gray sunlight bled in my silence and it became a flat rage put up my hand and he finally shut. Up went silent except to grow cold over days to let him go. He said love you had nothing to do but try to reconcile love and bleeding. This type of writing can be essential as an act of artistic catharsis, but it has never functioned as official denunciation\u2014as it did for many women who had been waiting for it, and in practice, for Iowa too\u2014 until now did not ask us to hold their post to a journalistic standard, but they wanted the post to stand with journalistic strength. And they are not alone in blurring the line between activism and journalism. After a similar incident in January in which multiple women tweeted sexual assault claims against the music publicist Heathcliff Berru, Brooklyn Magazine aggregated the tweets speedily; the post\u2019s author, Caitlin White, tweeted that she \u201c \u201d and \u201c \u201d the story, and that publications that hadn\u2019t re-posted those tweets were disrespecting the women\u2019s stories, or actively doing harm. (Some publications, Jezebel , were \u201clate\u201d because they were reporting, which takes longer; Berru has since resigned from his post, and denies raping or drugging anyone, but called his behavior \u201c \u201d to BKMag month later, White published another BKMag piece \u201c \u201d a man with 238 Twitter followers, whose arguably broadest claim to fame had come from the magazine itself listing him on its \u201c \u201d the previous September. The piece, which went up February 22, is a collection of allegations of sexual assault about him, all contextualized but anonymous, except for one. Our awareness of the prevalence and magnitude of sexual assault has outpaced the systems that expose and adjudicate it. It\u2019s incredibly difficult to match these two things up. But for activism to carry the authority of journalism\u2014or for journalism with an activist conclusion to work\u2014there are basic practices that can\u2019t be set aside. Noble goals can be quickly rendered immaterial: Rolling Stone should\u2019ve been enough to teach us that good intentions\u2014that \u201cbelieving women\u201d\u2014can end up hurting them dramatically in the end. And believing a woman, anyway, isn\u2019t the same as supporting her. Supporting a woman means strengthening her position, and the women who spoke to have been presented on shaky ground. The poet Sandra Beasley on her blog: \u201cThere\u2019s a possibility that the manner in which testimonies are gathered means that their circulation sparks a really important conversation\u2014but then, ultimately, limits it.\u201d She added, \u201cThat doesn\u2019t mean that doubt the veracity of these testimonies DOWN. broke ( reported ( among them ( down-a-music-publicist-acc-1753964374) disgusting ( reporting-on-sexual-assault-in-the-music-industry/) exposing ( of-assault/) 30 Under 30 Envy Index ( under-30-the-envy-index/) wrote ( In fact, the more seriously you take the stories, the more regrettable the method of their publication becomes. There is no correct way to process trauma\u2014let\u2019s be clear about that. There are, however, best practices for taking someone down. The latter, which was VIDA\u2019s stated goal in their post, requires precision of language rape accusation that is supposed to strip someone of their power cannot be written creatively \u201cfor effect.\u201d Let\u2019s say you truly believe a man like this is dangerous. Say you want to get him out of his prestigious teaching position. Do you write an anonymous account about blood and trees and sunlight? Or do you contact someone in a position of power, confirm their protection of your privacy, and write down, as clearly as possible, your account of anal rape called Larkin Grimm, the woman who started the conversation. Again, she\u2019s a musician, and relatively separate from the world; it doesn\u2019t seem coincidental that she\u2019s the only woman thus far who\u2019s willing to attach her full name. In the month since she wrote her Facebook post about Gira and Ellis, she says she\u2019s consistently received threats, including death threats. \u201cPeople saying had something to gain by telling the truth have no idea what it is like,\u201d she says also reached out multiple times to Ellis for comment while was reporting; he declined to speak to me about any aspect of this piece, so this is Grimm\u2019s account. Grimm and Ellis met two years ago, on an Amtrak train from Chicago to San Francisco. Both Ivy League alumni with \u201csimilar concerns about how race is handled in society,\u201d they hit it off immediately. Ellis, a photographer, took photos of Grimm; she invited him to have dinner with her family; soon, he asked her to join Heroes Are Gang Leaders. \u201cHe was making an effort to include women\u2019s voices, which really appreciated,\u201d Grimm told me felt so good about being in this band. We had almost an equal number of women and men, and it was a wonderful escape from the whiteness of indie rock. And hate that it\u2019s all crashing and burning.\u201d By Grimm\u2019s account, the trouble started when she and Ellis both started to play middleman roles in each other\u2019s relationships\u2014made more complicated by the fact that they were now bandmates, as well as both dating other members of the band. Grimm says she took issue with the way Ellis treated his girlfriend, crossing physical boundaries in a way that she says made the woman fearful, and \u201cpublicly berating her until she shut down.\u201d (Ellis\u2019s ex-girlfriend has strongly disputed Larkin\u2019s account, on the band\u2019s Facebook page: \u201cClearly Larkin Grimm is not well. Mental illness does not equate with dishonesty. However, in Grimm\u2019s case, both are active to the detriment of my colleague and former life partner, Thomas Ellis\u2019s reputation and career.\u201d She, along with other members of the band, politely declined to talk to me.) Involved both professionally and personally with Ellis, then, Grimm detailed a pattern that multiple women have described to me in similar words: increasingly forward emails, requests to photograph her, an escalating need to control her creative production, repeated denunciations of other women and other writers, and sexual jokes that she felt were harassment. Grimm brought up a long text that was written like a poem\u2014a habit several people mentioned\u2014which she said mentioned his penis wrote back, like, \u2018WHAT?\u2019 He told me that it was an accident; it was for somebody else. Well, I\u2019ve never sent an accidental long poem to anybody over a text message.\u201d It made her uncomfortable, she said; they had to work together. And then, by her account, he started asking her to \u201cwear certain things to recording sessions, because he wanted to photograph me in those things.\u201d Grimm noted that she appreciated having good photos of herself. \u201cBut that kind of attention was not always welcome.\u201d writing ( Grimm left the country, staying in Nepal for a couple months, returning shortly before the incident she wrote about in her Facebook post, when the band played a gig in Newark on February 6. As Grimm tells it, Ellis and his then-girlfriend got into a physical fight backstage, which she heard but did not visually witness: \u201cThere was screaming, they were moving from room to room, stuff was getting thrown around.\u201d The woman came out in tears, says Grimm, because Ellis had smashed her phone; the band was shaken, but they played the show anyway, as the fee was $600 each. Afterwards, according to Grimm, a band member tried to remind Ellis why he\u2019d formed the band in the first place, \u201cto celebrate the poetry of Amiri Baraka.\u201d Ellis then brought up the fact that Baraka had himself been jailed, in 1979, for beating his wife in a car. In other words, as Grimm put it: \u201cThere\u2019s a precedent for this.\u201d Precedent may be too light a word for the long history of troubling behavior from powerful men in creative fields. \u201cTradition,\u201d maybe, is closer have encountered this \u201ctradition\u201d many times myself, both from men in the music business and men in the business of literature (the latter being the former\u2019s shabbier, often trickier twin). At their shittiest, both types of men have a partially sincere, partially predatory appreciation for \u201csexy female weakness\u201d and its creative expression. (Youth is often taken to be a sexy female weakness in itself.) Both types of men have propositioned me in professional settings, subtly and explicitly. Every incident made me feel demoralized about my own abilities, and bad. Every woman spoke to asserted that Ellis\u2014attractive, accomplished, charismatic, uncompromising, male\u2014reaps the benefits of this tradition, at least implicitly. But this tradition, or more specifically the long-buried, justifiable indignation that women have developed in response to it, is exactly what\u2019s reared up to bite him now. Whether or not you think that\u2019s fair likely correlates to how recently you\u2019ve had a man in literature take advantage of his power over you. And the Iowa Writers\u2019 Workshop in particular, according to a dozen current and former students spoke to, has a solid history of male poetry professors dating female graduate students and\u2014according to women who had no words to mince about this\u2014behaving in misogynistic ways former student told me, \u201cWhat find interesting about the situation with Thomas Sayers Ellis is that, because of this article, the administration is being forced to pay a little more attention.\u201d She brought up a poetry professor who\u2019d been on staff when she was in the program: \u201cIt was at least equally bad in his situation, but they swept it under the rug.\u201d In interviews, multiple women with current or recent professional ties to Iowa independently brought up this prizewinning and respected poet, who no longer teaches at the program. As they detailed it, he had an affair with a student shortly before leaving his professorship, and everyone in the program knew. And while institutional policy varies on professor-student relationships, particularly in graduate programs, the effect on the women spoke to was inhibition\u2014a quiet sense of being undermined by the suspicion that success is achieved through sexualized means talked to a woman who asked for anonymity because she\u2019s still associated professionally with the University of Iowa. \u201cWhen got to Iowa,\u201d she told me was like, who the fuck are these people? And where are the adults? Shortly before I\u2019d gotten there, [the poet] had made out with a student at a party, in front of everyone.\u201d She noted that the program\u2019s funding structure, which is infamously competitive, made professor-student affairs even more fraught. The female student in question got a competitive fellowship and a place in this poet\u2019s workshop, and many students felt that this was blatantly wrong CLOSER. Later in her first semester, the former student said, the university held a mandatory sexual harassment training seminar (it was schoolwide, and unrelated to the rumors in the department). Everyone in the program was brought into the library on a Monday afternoon, right before the poetry workshop of the professor in question. \u201cStudents started asking questions about him, right in front of him, to the lawyer student raised her hand and said, \u2018What if there\u2019s a professor on faculty right now who\u2019s sleeping with a student?\u2019 The lawyer said, \u2018Well, then you should come talk to me.\u2019\u201d Soon afterwards, the poet left the program voluntarily. When reached out to him for comment\u2014leading with an apology, like a good young woman\u2014he wrote me back: \u201cThis was a pernicious and virulent rumor and if you insist on propagating it will sue you. Show some professional restraint.\u201d And indeed, the affair in question may have all been a rumor wasn\u2019t there, and the dozen current and former students who told me their impression of it aren\u2019t him. Nonetheless, the story is entrenched program lore, and it is the reason that the Ellis allegations are now being received the way they are. According to everyone spoke to, the department\u2019s sympathy appeared to lie with that poet\u2014as did many of the students\u2019 sympathy, particularly the men. Even a decade ago, an affair with a student was not seen as widely distasteful. But the stories about Ellis are arriving in a different climate: one in which we know what harassment is, in which a lot of industries feel ripe for a reckoning, in which social media has worked as a megaphone for people whose protests would have otherwise been ignored. The week that the post went up, Ellis\u2019s workshop students, as a unified group, boycotted his class. They went to a student\u2019s house instead, to discuss what to do. \u201cThere are some people who are really legitimately shaken,\u201d said a student in Ellis\u2019s other class, a seminar on conspiracy theories. \u201cThey\u2019re concerned about being in this really personal space with a known harasser.\u201d But is Thomas Sayers Ellis a known harasser, or an alleged one? How much has VIDA, or its audience\u2014 with the best of intentions\u2014flattened the space between the two talked to three other women who had been students of Ellis\u2019s outside of Iowa. They all said he made people very uncomfortable in workshop \u2014and that, furthermore, they appreciated the intellectual and creative challenge this gave them. One said that this state of productive discomfort was \u201cexactly how things should be.\u201d Another said that her many one-on-one experiences with him were \u201calways unnerving, but never felt unsafe.\u201d Another wrote to me over email: At no time did he interact with me in a sexual, sexist, predatory, or misogynistic manner. At no time did receive an inappropriate amount of communication from nor did receive any messages or emails that disturbed or alarmed me on the basis of tone, content, or frequency. My experience in the classroom with contributed to my becoming a more confident writer, while constantly developing my critical eye. There is a degree to which\u2014at least within the institutional context of Iowa has positioned Thomas Sayers Ellis as a stand-in for the \u201clitany of men in academia and the writing world who are creeps,\u201d as his current student put it. She named other two men who teach in the Writers\u2019 Workshop: \u201cDon\u2019t expect them to give you any consideration if you\u2019re not a straight white dude, or a woman who writes graphic, sexual poetry former Iowa student pointed out that these men had married former students\u2014as did the professor whose story is referenced above. \u201cIt\u2019s so gross that they treat their grad students like a dating pool,\u201d she said. This is another situation where awareness has sped far ahead of procedure. And in a few arenas think procedure should not be expected to catch up. If programs disqualified people from employment or admission because of their predictable aesthetic preferences, the entire system would crater in healthy institution cannot and shouldn\u2019t create codes dictating attitudes, priorities, vibes in the classroom. What they can and should adjudicate are actions: documented harassment, for instance, or a teacher-student affair FRAUGHT. But there is no proof that Thomas Sayers Ellis has done any of this during the time he has been teaching at the Iowa Writer\u2019s Workshop. There appear to be no open allegations about his behavior during this period, though the department solicited them. After the post went up, a secretary in the department sent a student a message that was passed on through a general listserv, opening her email up to \u201canyone has experienced or paid witness to an inappropriate experience with TSE.\u201d The workshop declined to comment on any part of this piece, citing an inability to speak on \u201cpersonnel issues.\u201d In the week following the post, the Office of Strategic Communication wrote, in an email to me, \u201cThe allegations are concerning and we are looking into the situation. We will proceed in a manner that is respectful to all parties.\u201d (The allegations mentioned here appear to be VIDA\u2019s, exclusively, by unofficial but unchallenged account.) The communications director pointed me to Iowa\u2019s institutional policies, which are typically vague on both (they are \u201cprohibited\u201d in theory, but adjudicated in ) and , whose procedure section is dizzying. So Iowa had the latitude to proceed essentially however they wanted to, which doesn\u2019t mean there was an obvious way to proceed. The situation opens up a series of questions that remain open: Should you terminate someone\u2019s employment if a website publishes a series of anonymous allegations against him from deliberately impossible-to-confirm points in the past? Should an institution simply trust the odds that women\u2019s unconfirmed allegations tend to be true? Will those odds change if this type of takedown becomes widely viable? And further\u2014and have asked myself this, and come to no good answers: What do schools do if a student feels uncomfortable about her professor based on unofficially reported warnings? Do they dismiss the professor? Move the student around to another class? At what point would an employer begin to have a legally sound case for official dismissal? What if the professor in question were reportedly terrible enough to an ex-girlfriend that she\u2019ll get on the phone with a stranger, late at night, barely able to breathe straight, holding back tears? Here\u2019s the central complication: In creative fields like writing and music, the boundary between personal and professional is thin. Your personal life is expressed in your professional output; your professional connections within your industry are likely your closest personal connections, too. And so, the boundary between personal misconduct and professional misconduct remains logistically fluid. The ex-girlfriend spoke to was a fellow poet, a respected, credentialed, widely published one\u2014a woman who had met Thomas Sayers Ellis through her work. Her voice broke when she said she was afraid to tell me the year she met him. \u201cIf say anything like that, I\u2019m scared that he\u2019ll know it\u2019s me.\u201d Again, this is her account, as Ellis declined to comment on the story after multiple rounds of contact. She detailed a pattern of escalating emails, then a few months of a whirlwind relationship that turned \u201cdemanding, and violent asked if she meant emotionally. \u201cSexually, too. He would be gentle at first FLUID. consensual student-teacher relationships ( any number of non-ways ( sexual harassment ( and then go over the line. And he would just say how much he loved it, and you would wonder what\u2019s wrong with you that you\u2019re not enjoying this thing he says is so good.\u201d She views these encounters, she told me in later conversations, as rape. When she read the post went to therapy,\u201d she told me. \u201cMy therapist called it \u2018vicarious trauma.\u2019 With all of those stories, and with the Larkin Grimm thing thought, that sounds exactly like Thomas had no trouble believing any of the women. There is no mistaking him asked her what she would say to a young poet who had Ellis in workshop, who was thinking of him as a professional mentor. Her voice, shaky up till that point, grew urgent would tell her to run away screaming from Thomas,\u201d she said, \u201cand would ask her if she needs help would tell her to stay the hell away from him at all costs. Our world is so personal, and our work is so personal, and he takes advantage not only of his authority, but of people\u2019s confidences and their vulnerability.\u201d Finally asked her whether she thought the language currently being used to describe Ellis was accurate. \u201cYes,\u201d she said. \u201cHe\u2019s an abuser. He hurt me. We went to a writers\u2019 conference, and kept telling him didn\u2019t want to do something, so he pushed me in a closet and tried to have sex with me in the closet, and he kept grabbing my breasts and kept saying no and had to scream to get him to stop.\u201d She took a deep, shuddering breath, and couldn\u2019t speak for a minute; my own heart caught in my throat. \u201cHe didn\u2019t just do it one time,\u201d she said, after a little. \u201cHe was untouchable, or he thought he was. But that era is over, for all those guys think she\u2019s right on that last point, and thankfully. Finally. But wonder if we have a clear sense of what here can be adjudicated, and how. Some of what is being alleged against Ellis is criminal. What some women are talking about\u2014including the woman spoke to above\u2014is physical and sexual assault. If these allegations are unreported and un- investigated, or alleged in public but anonymously, then the personal methods of holding someone accountable start to diverge from the institutional ones. You can denounce someone personally based on deliberately \u201cde-identified\u201d hearsay, but can you fire them? As an institution, without a corroborated or formal report, can you say anything at all? People have tweeted at Sarah Lawrence, asking the school to issue a statement (presumably) condemning Ellis. \u201cHave you been reading or nah??\u201d one writer tweeted, to which the college : \u201cWe are concerned by these allegations but have no record of complaints from the time he was on our faculty several years ago.\u201d The writer replied again: \u201cWill the college make a statement?\u201d But the type of denunciation they are looking for, from an institution like Sarah Lawrence, is not legally permissible without a report on the record. The two most prominent outlets that have collected signatures in solidarity with the women who spoke to do not even Thomas Sayers Ellis . After the point of institutional responsibility, it gets even blurrier. Almost everything in the stories makes Ellis sound reprehensible\u2014but reprehensible is not against the law. Nor does it seem to be a universal experience with him: An ex-girlfriend who asked we only identify her by her intials, K.K., lived with him for several years with a young child in the house, and talked to me on the phone for a half-hour about his unqualified kindness to her: \u201cThe post was in complete contrast to my experience. It was entirely different from what knew DIVERGE. replied ( mention ( our-creative-community/) by name ( support-of-a-statement-against-abusive-behavior-in-our-creative-community/) And some of what is being called traumatizing about him is related to his personality. These women say Ellis is harsh, critical, uncaring in the face of another person\u2019s discomfort. These qualities are bad in a relationship; they are warning signs in men, and they are central to the dynamic that defines abuse. However, these qualities are not universally unwelcome in the classroom. Without a criminal complaint or a verified investigation, these qualities are not, on their own, grounds for firing. They do not negate Ellis\u2019s ability to teach, or even teach well. \u201cThere\u2019s a landscape of affirmation that a lot of writing programs have turned into,\u201d said another poet, who has known Ellis for several years. (She\u2019s the one who had no negative experiences to contribute to VIDA.) \u201cEveryone wants to get a pat on the back. But do you come to get a pat on the back or do you come to learn how to think? Thomas knows he\u2019s antagonistic, that his style is abrasive. He wants people to learn how to take up space in the room.\u201d It\u2019s telling to me that this woman expressed serious concern that her honest, considered assessment of the situation would be seen as traitorous to feminism; she thought about withdrawing her point of view from the story, anonymous as it is. The stories, she said, mainly detailed regret. \u201cRelationships don\u2019t always end up the way that they might, and people can get very upset and very hurt. And our greatest defense as writers is our pen, so we use it.\u201d She said, \u201cAnd of course, the claim that you don\u2019t feel safe is going to be valued no matter what. Even if there\u2019s no harm that\u2019s imminent. You can say feel threatened,\u2019 and you know what? Most people feel threatened by the black male body anyway. If society tells us anything, it\u2019s that asked her if any of the accounts had surprised her or made her think differently about Ellis man who\u2019s 50 and never been married? Who\u2019s attractive? No, it is no surprise to me that he\u2019s had sex before,\u201d she said. \u201cHe\u2019s troubled. He\u2019s manipulative. But if we take the accounts to be true, doesn\u2019t he need exactly what the victims are asking for? Privacy, healing, help. He deserves compassion the way the women do, too.\u201d She saw the post as \u201can eye for an eye felt like was done poorly so I\u2019m gonna do people poorly. But that\u2019s vengeance, that\u2019s not justice. You want something to change, you go the legal route.\u201d \u201cAnd I\u2019m not discounting their claims,\u201d she said. \u201cI\u2019m not discounting Larkin\u2019s claims, either. I\u2019m just reserving judgment for now. Because, the idea that the literary world is so narrow that a man like that holds the key? These men do not have as much power as we think they do. When you believe that they have power over you, you are reinforcing whatever power they do have. There\u2019s no one gatekeeper. The gates are open.\u201d Only a month has elapsed since Larkin Grimm accused Thomas Sayers Ellis of harassment in public. Ellis is no longer a visiting professor at Iowa; he has not taught a single class after the post was published. He has been quietly moved out of his position, his students moved to other teachers and other seminars. And so the post worked exactly as the women and the organization intended it to: It has started an overdue conversation; it has ensured these women were heard; it has taken Ellis out of favor. This means that the post has also, depending on your point of view, either proved or disproved its fundamental logic, which is that no one ever wants to listen to women\u2019s accusations without these tactics\u2014that allowing these women to tell their stories of alleged abuse at the hands of Ellis without holding them to any standard of corroboration or contextualization was the only way that this conversation could be had. Amy King of the board read me this statement over the phone ROUTE.\u201d Allegations have been circulating for some time now, for years, and given Ellis\u2019s prominence in the community believes that the issues raised in the post are important to discuss. As noted in the post, it was written by a collective of writers and artists who wish to remain anonymous. We had no reason to doubt them. The culture and system as it stands now does not support women who come forward as individuals, and allowing women to post their stories together provides them that support. We at have historically given women a platform for their voices, and that\u2019s what we\u2019ve been advocating for. We are an activist organization. We are advocating for women to be heard. \u201cSome of these posts may be by students,\u201d she told me. \u201cSome of them detail personal relationships, like the last one, disrupting the idea that abusive relationships start out abusive\u2014or that attackers are strangers, or people you\u2019ve just met asked King if considered trying to contextualize the stories that seemed like they may have been by students. Engaging in an undisclosed teacher-student relationship is in many places a rule violation; it is solidly actionable in a way that being a horrible partner is usually not. \u201cI\u2019m not speaking to the truth of these testimonies,\u201d she said, after reminding me repeatedly that she was not engaged in writing or reporting. \u201cWhat I\u2019m speaking to is that we gave this collective of anonymous artists a platform to speak about issues that we find important to discuss.\u201d What has struck me most, in reporting this, is the extent of the duress women have found ourselves under \u2014which has already resulted in women associated with this post believing that we are fundamentally at odds. We agree on almost everything: that the legacy of bad men in creative fields is onerous and near-universal; that it\u2019s terrifying that whispers about an important and inappropriate man can circle for decades without anyone doing anything; that any man who repeatedly takes advantage of his power over women should be called to account. We agree, even, that institutions have failed women so dramatically that we\u2019ve reached this particular state of things\u2014where a deeply flawed but pragmatically essential hierarchy of systems is beginning to be reversed. We believe that the police system fails women, that the courts fail women, that institutions fail women. But on the next step, we differ, and significantly. VIDA, and many of the women who spoke to VIDA, believe that this \u201cguerrilla activism\u201d is the only option; that asking women to present their stories in any other way than the way they\u2019ve decided to\u2014any other way than what makes them feel most comfortable\u2014is infantilizing, and re-traumatizing, and asking too much, and wrong. In reporting this piece, I\u2019ve spoken to women who have withheld part or all of their story when they heard was criticizing VIDA\u2019s methods. The opinion that VIDA\u2019s way is the only way to do it, in other words, is deeply and sincerely held. \u201cThe women at are heroes,\u201d said the poet who detailed her assault to me on the phone. But as see it, with the criminal justice system so stacked against women that Jian Ghomeshi\u2019s not guilty verdict was as a of exactly why women do not file official reports\u2014with the jurisdiction of creative END. near-universally viewed ( trial-lucy-de-coutere-interview?CMP=share_btn_tw) symbol ( mid=twitter_cut) writing institutions being usually temporary and scattershot and often irresponsible\u2014it is the press who holds the final line of responsibility. And this responsibility is getting complicated as journalism blurs with activism, which cannot deny the obligations of journalism and then ask to claim its weight. This is a method of \u201cbelieving women\u201d that will contribute to a wider disbelief of women. Forget journalistic standards, even\u2014if we move towards establishing anonymous accusation as a moral gold standard, it will weaken our position in the end. On March 18, 12 days after the post, the founders of the organization (none of whom sit on the organization\u2019s Board of Directors) quietly over email. \u201cNone of us knew that intended to publish such a report,\u201d they wrote. \u201cWe were not consulted by the executive committee, nor were we alerted to its forthcoming publication by anyone from VIDA.\u201d They note that \u201cwomen often feel unsafe reporting harassment, rape, inappropriate conduct,\u201d and \u201cfor good reason\u201d\u2014 but that they are \u201cdeeply concerned by the notion of where internet \u2018call out\u2019 and \u2018take down\u2019 culture could easily lead.\u201d They say that anonymous accusation has \u201cenormous and disturbing implications\u201d for \u201cany ethical, thinking person.\u201d (It suggests, again, the changes in this conversation that the accusations against Ellis were made publicly, while the founders\u2019 editorial denunciation was not.) Though I\u2019m not sure everything in the post is measurably of public interest\u2014asking to be called \u201cdaddy\u201d in bed is not the same as sexual assault, and it should be a feminist priority to keep the two things separate on the spectrum, rather than collapse them wouldn\u2019t call it \u201ccall-out culture\u201d either. It was motivated by pain, and panic, and what felt like last resort. As Kat Stoeffel said in response to the \u201calt-lit\u201d accusations in 2014, these women wanted to warn other women; they wanted to be heard. But they are also calling for and eliciting an institutional reaction, in this case. And the responses to the founders\u2019 statement have been telling. One woman tweeted, not only affirming the link between VIDA\u2019s post and \u201ccall-out culture\u201d but defending the latter\u2019s validity: \u201cYou can only get mad about anonymous call-out culture if you know you\u2019re wrong.\u201d That is untrue. When the goals are crucial, the execution is even more so. We finally have people listening; we are finally in front of a set of wider cultural values that make it possible to end the era of the important, inappropriate literary man. And it\u2019s not fair in a larger sense that women bear the procedural responsibility I\u2019m asking for. It\u2019s horrifically unfair that so much more is asked of victims than rapists, who, as one blogger pointed out, get to be \u201c \u201d no matter what. But there is no righting that wrong through blurred methods, through asking informal testimony to bear an institutional burden. There is too much at stake here for a woman who comes forward to be put in the position where anyone could say\u2014as people tend to, and as we continue to make possible, through a scrim of good intentions\u2014that it\u2019s not quite clear what she\u2019s talking about. Illustration by Jim Cooke Recommended stories \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 resigned ( anonymous guerrillas ( More from Jezebel ( Is Elon Musk the World\u2019s Biggest Deadbeat? ( Introducing Ask the Group Chat: Jezebel's Weekly 'Advice' Column ( Hunter Schafer Am Never Going to Stop Being Trans. Fuck This Administration\u2019 ( administration) Start the discussion... ( | Sponsored ( ( ( | Sponsored ( ( ( | Sponsored ( ( Play War Thunder now for free Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now Shooter Action Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now Access all channels anywhere, anytime ( | Sponsored ( ( ( | Sponsored ( ( Join new Free to Play War Thunder Fight in over 2000 unique and authentic Vehicles. Fight on Land, on Water and in the Air. Join the most comprehensive vehicular combat game. Over 2000 tanks, ships and aircraft. Play Now All Channels for Only $49 (Buy Now) ( | Sponsored ( ( ( | Sponsored ( ( ( | Sponsored ( ( Crossout: New Apocalyptic Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now Explore Affordable Camper Van Options Learn More Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals ( | Sponsored ( ( ( Now Is The Perfect Time To Get An Unsold Camper Van Learn More Belly Fat Removal Without Surgery in Pakistan: The Price Might Surprise You Still here. Still without airbrushing. Still with teeth. Newsletter ( Masthead ( Contact Us ( Advertise ( About ( Copyright ( Privacy ( \u00a9 2025 Paste Media Group. All Rights Reserved | Sponsored ( ( Sign Up"} |
7,339 | William McHugh | Florida State University | [
"7339_101.pdf",
"7339_102.pdf"
] | {"7339_101.pdf": "The Wayback Machine - Weather | Sports | Forums | Comics | Classifieds | Calendar | Movies Report faults president An investigation finds that officials failed to enforce the school's sexual harassment policy. By \u00a9 St. Petersburg Times, published August 3, 2000 -- For more than a decade, Florida State University failed to properly investigate and resolve sexual harassment complaints against a law school professor accused of everything from making crude comments in the classroom to exposing himself to a female student, a new report says president and former law school dean Talbot \"Sandy\" D'Alemberte \"bears direct responsibility\" for that failure, according to the findings of an exhaustive investigation into sexual harassment allegations and other issues that have tainted the law school's reputation. Since last spring, at least six law school faculty members have left, including women who charged that failed to respond to or condoned discrimination, harassment and inappropriate conduct. The university's office of inspector general hired an outside law firm -- BakerBotts of Austin, Texas -- to look into the allegations. The report released Wednesday came to two conclusions that pleased officials: no pattern of sexual harassment of female students by male faculty, and no evidence of a hostile work work environment, based on gender or race. However, FSU's handling of allegations against law professor William McHugh, and D'Alemberte's role in that case, is severely criticized. While had policies in place to protect students against sexual harassment, D'Alemberte and other administrators \"consciously neglected in certain circumstances to enforce FSU's clear written policy for handling such complaints,\" the report states. The investigators noted that D'Alemberte's close working relationship and high regard for McHugh's wife, Donna McHugh -- who works in university relations at -- \"creates an appearance of impropriety and favoritism.\" \"Any judgment D'Alemberte renders in the matter lacks credibility and may be questioned . . .\" the report states. In a written response to the conclusions, D'Alemberte accused investigators of distorting statements, engaging in \"sloppy thinking\" and a \"gross distortion of the record,\" among other criticisms. D'Alemberte also pointed out his record in improving the handling of sexual harassment complaints: He replaced FSU's general counsel; pushed for the creation of a new sexual harassment policy that requires all complaints to go to the FSU's inspector general's office; and urged the inspector general to conduct education sessions on sexual harassment and other issues for faculty and staff. 2/22/25, 10:38 State: Report faults president web.archive.org/web/20030515030940/ 1/3 \"When became president was not satisfied with the way that we were doing things . . . and took action to remedy these problems,\" D'Alemberte wrote. D'Alemberte, 67, began serving as president in 1994, and had served as law school dean between 1984 and 1989. In the 1980s, problems were already brewing with McHugh, a law school professor who was running a center for employment relations and law at FSU. Staff complained about his offensive and obscene language, his dirty jokes and his degrading comments about women, records show. After one women filed a formal complaint about McHugh's behavior, personnel official Jim Tinsley went to D'Alemberte. \"His response to me was that he didn't want anything to do with it,\" Tinsley told investigators. While McHugh was a law school professor, D'Alemberte said McHugh reported to another supervisor and not to the law school dean. He said he recalled being told by the Dean of Faculties that this was not a matter for the law school. D'Alemberte also said he had \"no knowledge, not even hearsay knowledge,\" of a second complaint against McHugh in the late 1980s. But investigators took issue with his version of events: \"D'Alemberte's statements that he was not involved, was told to stay out, and did not know what happened are not credible,\" the reports states. The allegations against McHugh would continue. In February 1996, a law school student complained that McHugh was making sexually offensive remarks in class and racially offensive remarks outside of class Provost Lawrence G. Abele acknowledged that the complaint \"just sort of drifted,\" until June 1997, and said there was \"no reason why this should have been allowed to lay around so long,\" according to the report. D'Alemberte gave McHugh a letter dated June 24, 1997, warning that McHugh's use of profanity and off-color remarks in the classroom is unacceptable. Investigators noted that D'Alemberte initially provided an unsigned copy of the letter to McHugh, allowing him a chance to read it and acknowledge that it was appropriate before D'Alemberte signed it year later, the most serious charge against McHugh surfaced: While in his office, McHugh was showing a law school student and another research assistant his hernia scar when his pants slipped down, exposing his stomach and penis. The law school student filed a formal complaint. After a series of reviews of the case, McHugh was given a written reprimand. McHugh, 67, remains a tenured professor at the law school, although he is not teaching class. He is working a center for professional development at FSU, helping with legal courses offered on-line and reviewing contracts with state agencies. There have been no complaints against him, said Susann Rudasill, associate director at the center. State university system chancellor Adam Herbert had not yet received the report Wednesday afternoon, but plans to review it, a spokesman said. 2/22/25, 10:38 State: Report faults president web.archive.org/web/20030515030940/ 2/3 \u00a9 Copyright 2003 St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved 2/22/25, 10:38 State: Report faults president web.archive.org/web/20030515030940/ 3/3", "7339_102.pdf": "problematic professor Published July 24, 1999 | Updated Sept. 29, 2005 Because of his long history of disgraceful behavior at FSU's law school, William McHugh deserves more than a letter of reprimand tenured professor at a state law school has the First Amendment right to be controversial, even a little vulgar, in his teaching style at times. But that right does not include abusing his authority or discriminating against certain students. This is a tough line to draw, especially during this era of overly sensitive college campuses, where some students and professors complain about the slightest offense, real or imagined. But Florida State University law professor William McHugh is more than merely crass. Because of a pattern of disgraceful behavior on his part, the school has had to spend the past five months figuring out where academic freedom ends and illegal harassment begins For years, students have been accusing McHugh, who has taught at since 1973, of gratuitously using explicit sexual references in class, targeting students for intimidation and giving retaliatory bad grades. According to the Tallahassee Democrat, more than 20 women over the years have complained about sexual harassment from McHugh. Kristine Adams claims McHugh began retaliating against her after she corrected a calculation error he made in class. She alleges he even changed correct answers to wrong ones on her exam. But it wasn't until his research assistant, Wendy Stein, who was a second-year law student at the time, alleged that McHugh exposed himself while showing off his hernia scar in June 1998, that the university responded with appropriate diligence The Alarming Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Millennials: 3 Things You... By Moffitt Cancer Center Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:39 problematic professor 1/3 After a baby was born in a hurricane shelter, a witness is left wondering Nov. 19, 2024 \u2022 Hurricane Hurricane Helene to keep Tampa Bay area schools closed Friday Sept. 26, 2024 \u2022 Hurricane McHugh was suspended with pay, and a peer review investigation was launched. After five months of interviewing witnesses and combing through documents, a panel of university professors found that McHugh was guilty of misconduct but not sexual harassment. The panel concluded he hadn't intended to expose himself, that he just accidentally revealed a little too much while showing his scar. But the panel did note that McHugh had been aware of student complaints and had received warnings from the administration about his untoward behavior for at least six years His punishment was a letter of reprimand from provost Lawrence Abele, who effectively told him this was his last chance. McHugh was warned to stop the sexual references and profanity unless \"derived directly from the teaching materials of the course.\" Some people may believe the panel came to a thoughtful, balanced decision and that the punishment fits the offense. But many fair-minded people will see it as a slap on the wrist has tolerated McHugh's antics for so long that this appears to be just another pass. It comes on the heels of a mass resignation of five female law faculty, four of whom cited the pervasive racism and sexism of their male colleagues as among their reasons for quitting. Even though President Sandy D'Alemberte has the ultimate responsibility for this mess, he has seemed reluctant to shoulder it, as if his friendship with McHugh and his distaste for making waves have left him unwilling to assert control. When D\"Alemberte was FSU's law school dean from 1984 to 1989, he failed to address the problem despite ample student complaints. His neglect of the situation over the years has left stunted. Quality female students and faculty will steer clear of the institution, and female graduates won't feel sufficient school pride to be contributing alumni until the atmosphere changes McHugh's return to the classroom sends a terrible signal. Donate Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:39 problematic professor 2/3 More Florida faculty still looking to leave the state, survey shows Sept. 18, 2024 \u2022 Archive Drivers could cross the new Howard Frankland in six months. Here\u2019s what\u2019s left. Aug. 12, 2024 \u2022 Transportation What to expect from the Lightning at trade deadline March 3, 2024 \u2022 Sports Tampa council approves $14 million to settle wrongful conviction lawsuit over 1983 murder Feb. 15, 2024 \u2022 Tampa Florida makes it official: Universities to drop sociology as a core course Jan. 24, 2024 \u2022 Archive Pete Alonso\u2019s Battle for the Bay knocks giving back out of the park Jan. 22, 2024 \u2022 Photos Tampa woman charged after 3 puppies found in dumpster, police say Dec. 26, 2023 \u2022 Breaking News \u2018Three Little Words\u2019 series raises ire Nov. 30, 2021 \u2022 Archive Menu Subscribe Subscribe 2/22/25, 10:39 problematic professor 3/3"} |
8,764 | Brent Fisk | Western Kentucky University – Bowling Green | [
"8764_101.pdf"
] | {"8764_101.pdf": "Alexandra Hendricks WKUHerald.com \u2022 September 20, 2021 \u2022 decade-of-university-title-ix-actions/ Blacked out: Redacted sexual misconduct files obscure nearly a decade of university Title actions Lily Burris and Debra Murray After a four-year legal battle and a Supreme Court decision in a similar case released nearly a decade\u2019s worth of sexual misconduct records this summer in response to a Herald open records request filed in 2016 and another earlier this year. Files from both responses, a total of 39 investigations, were released but heavily redacted. In 27 cases, covering allegations of sexual misconduct lodged against faculty or other employees from 2011 through 2020, the university concluded that the incidents did not violate WKU\u2019s Title policy. Those claims involved both students and employees and ranged from possible homophobic job denial to what the person felt was excessive touching found, in nine cases, enough evidence that resulted in the resignation or retirement of faculty or staff members, effectively ending the investigation before a formal conclusion. This included a case of a male staff member threatening to place holds on a female student\u2019s TopNet account, blocking her from registering for classes, in exchange for going on dates. In three cases, enough evidence was found to fire or discontinue the employees. Michael Abate, the Herald\u2019s attorney at the Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird law firm in Louisville, contends that the records released were \u201cseriously over-redacted.\u201d Abate said the Herald is in the process of disputing those redactions and may ask the courts to resolve the dispute. In the original Nov. 1, 2016, open records request, the Herald asked for all investigative records for all Title investigations into all sexual misconduct allegations against employees in the last five years. This request was mirrored in spring 2021 when began to fulfill the original request initially rejected the 2016 request by citing the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. The Herald appealed the decision to Kentucky\u2019s attorney general, who oversees public access laws. The then Attorney General, now Governor Andy Beshear ruled was in violation of the Kentucky Open Records Act and ordered to turn over the documents. Instead sued the Herald in Warren County Circuit Court in February 2017 in a case that still has not been resolved 4 1\u20442 years later. In a similar case where the University of Kentucky refused to turn over sexual misconduct records to the Kentucky Kernel, the university student newspaper, the state Supreme Court in March ruled in favor of the publication. The court opinion said could not use as an \u201cinvisibility cloak\u201d to hide all documents involved or associated with students. The federal law does indicate should be used to protect students\u2019 educational records. Abate said \u201ca requester is entitled to everything in the file not specifically exempt\u201d and cannot use to redact information about employees. The university is required to provide an index of reasons for their redactions. While did provide an index, Abate disputes whether many of the redactions were permissible under the Open Records Act. After the decision decided to begin turning over the 2011- 2016 records to the Herald, releasing redacted records over the next few months. In turn, the Herald made an identical request for records of such cases from 2016-2021. With the redactions, Abate said things appear to be missing from the files. The biggest one is the names of faculty and staff accused of wrong- doing, even if the claim is not found to be a violation of university policy. Abate said there is controlling case law that entitles the public to the names and handlings of the accusations. \u201cIn many instances, the university also redacted key substantive details of the allegations that make it difficult to know what actually happened,\u201d Abate said. \u201cSeveral files appear to be missing documentation contained in almost all other files. And in some places the redactions are not clearly explained, so it\u2019s impossible to know exactly what has been withheld.\u201d In a document outlining its reasons for redactions said it was following the ruling of the Supreme Court, federal privacy regulations and, on cases where no violations were found, a 2020 attorney general\u2019s opinion. For the public to have confidence in the safety of the campus community, Abate said, they must know these allegations are being handled seriously and appropriately. \u201cPublic universities simply cannot be permitted to sweep serious allegations under the rug or quietly push policy violators out the door to other institutions where they might offend again,\u201d Abate said. \u201cUnfortunately, the facts that have come to light from the Herald\u2019s reporting show that pattern of behavior is all too common among universities.\u201d Alexandra Hendricks \u2018In the dark\u2019 On May 4, 2017, the Herald published \u201cIn the Dark,\u201d an in-depth report in which former Herald staffer Nicole Ares reported on more than 1,200 pages of records obtained through public records requests to all eight public Kentucky universities. Six of the eight universities provided records at the time, with only and Kentucky State University denying the request. Ares\u2019 story detailed violations at Northern Kentucky University, Eastern Kentucky University and Murray State University. At the time Andrea Anderson, who was then Title coordinator and now WKU\u2019s general counsel, told Ares that had six investigations that resulted in violations of the university\u2019s misconduct policy. Alexandra Hendricks Title policy Deborah Wilkins, WKU\u2019s Title coordinator who at the time of the Herald\u2019s 2016 request was general counsel, said Title discrimination includes sexual harassment and assault, domestic violence and stalking. Wilkins said this policy is not a complaint process, but is more of a services process. When WKU\u2019s Title office talks about an investigation, Wilkins said, investigators try to use neutral language. The person who filed the report is referred to as the complainant. The person accused in the report is called the respondent. \u201cWhen we get a report, the first thing we do, whether it\u2019s an employee or a student, is [ask] what can we do to assist this person?\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cWhat services can we do to help them get on track? Get comfortable? Respond to their needs?\u201d These services are about bringing back the sense of safety and security the complainant had before, Wilkins said. This might include changing a student\u2019s residence hall, prohibiting someone from entering a residence hall or getting the student from a class. The majority of reports the Title office receives come from a student about another student. These reports then involve employees in the Office of Student Conduct such as Michael Crowe, director, or Melanie Evans, coordinator. Other reports to the Title office involve employees, like the ones the Herald requested. The cases are handled by the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action/University Services, where Joshua Hayes is director, Title deputy/investigator and university coordinator. Hayes declined to be interviewed. After a complainant files a report and immediate services have been administered, Wilkins said, she is obligated under law to ask the person if they want to file a complaint and have their case formally investigated. Wilkins said they treat each report like it\u2019s going to be a complaint, but it\u2019s not their top priority. \u201cMy priority is to help them first,\u201d Wilkins said. Once a report is made to the Title office against an employee, Wilkins reaches out to the complainant to speak with them about the issue. Whether or not the complainant responds, Wilkins and Hayes begin an investigation into the complaint if it\u2019s about an employee, a new step as of August 2020. When Wilkins speaks with a complainant, she asks them if there were any witnesses they want the office to reach out to, which they will have the opportunity to add later. The complainant will be asked if they want an adviser to help them through the process. After the complainant has spoken with the Title office, Wilkins will offer them a copy of the transcript of their conversation to review and edit before officially adding it to the file. Simultaneously, Wilkins and Hayes then reach out to the director of the area of the university where the respondent worked, assuming the complaint is not against the director, and inform them that a complaint has been filed against one of their employees. They ask the director to make sure the parties are not in close contact or sharing responsibilities. Next, they interview the respond- ent against whom the report was filed to hear their version of events. They too are offered an adviser and asked for their list of witnesses. The respondent may say the opposite of what the student says and they are also allowed to review their statement. If there are videos, messages or emails that can be provided as evidence to the case, Wilkins said she and Hayes would also review those as a part of this process. Hayes and Wilkins then start talking to witnesses and having them review their statements for the investigation. This can take varying lengths of time, depending on the size of the department, how many witnesses there are and how fast they respond. Once the file is completed, it is shared with the complainant and respondent. They may have nothing to add to it. \u201cThen Josh and will determine, do we think there\u2019s a likelihood the policy has been violated?\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cIs there enough here to have a hearing?\u201d Another change since August 2020 is that if there is an employee involved in a complaint, there will be a hearing with an outside officer from the state Council on Postsecondary Education unless the allegation turns out to be entirely without foundation. Wilkins said an example would be if there was an allegation of an incident that happened on campus and the accused employee was proven to be in California at the time. During this process, an employee respondent can decide to resign or retire. If they do, then the investigation stops and that will be noted in the record. Wilkins said this stops with retirement or resignation because the university essentially loses jurisdiction. If the hearing officer decides the respondent has violated Title policy, the office issues a notice. Then the respondent\u2019s department head and the vice president of the division where the respondent works have 10 days to decide how they\u2019re going to address it and inform WKU\u2019s Title office, another new step as of August 2020 requires any employee who hears of sexual misconduct to report it to the Title office, even if it doesn\u2019t involve them or their work, but does not expect the person making such a report to verify that the incident actually occurred. \u201cBasically, what I\u2019m hammering on them is you don\u2019t have to investigate, you don\u2019t have to determine if it\u2019s true,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cJust call us and we\u2019ll determine if it\u2019s true and you can go on your way.\u201d Alexandra Hendricks Title changes On Aug. 14, 2020, new federal Title regulations took effect. \u201cIn my mind, the biggest change was the fact that if it involves an employee, there is a hearing,\u201d Wilkins said. This means that with every Title report that comes in involving an employee, the office has to do a full investigation. \u201cIf there\u2019s evidence to show that it\u2019s more likely than not that a violation occurred, we will have a hearing,\u201d Wilkins said. Reports that only involve students can end or be resolved without a hearing. For each report involving an employee, the hearing officer for the case is a neutral person from the state Council on Postsecondary Education. This hearing officer will hear from the complainant, respondent, any witness and the investigators before deciding if the policy or policies in question were violated. Before August 2020, those matters were handled within the university. After the hearing officer makes a decision, the complainant or the respondent can appeal it and then a new hearing officer will make a new decision. However, no one else can appeal the decision. The respondent\u2019s supervisor is not allowed to disagree and ignore it. Wilkins said has not, as of yet, had an occasion that would need a hearing officer from the CPE. \u201cThe other thing that was part of the changes in federal law was that if you\u2019re an employee and you have an investigation pending against you, you can\u2019t resign or retire,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cNo one can prevent an individual from quitting a job, but the new regulations require us to note on that employee\u2019s permanent records, employment records that they resigned or retired under an investigation.\u201d Before, there was no requirement for a former employer to disclose if the person under consideration for a job had left their previous position under a Title investigation. Potential new employers only knew of that if they asked. It is now required to disclose if someone left under investigation in a job recommendation. Wilkins said the people hiring the respondent do have to reach out to the university and ask about them, and if they do, their former supervisor must tell them about the investigation. If a student leaves under an investigation, that is also noted on their permanent record. Wilkins said if a student or an employee leaves the university loses jurisdiction over the process. \u201cWe can\u2019t force people who are no longer associated with us to come back and go through the processes,\u201d Wilkins said. From the case files the Herald received through open records requests, several of the cases appear to have ended because the employee left the university. Amid the Title policy changes, there is also now a requirement for the supervisors of the employee who is found to violate the policy to report back to the Title office in writing their decision on what to do within 10 days. \u201cWhen you\u2019re forced to look at objective decision making and make your own decision and sign your name to it, it makes it a little harder to excuse bad behavior,\u201d Wilkins said. The decision about consequences for the respondent goes to the super- visor and the vice president of their division because they are responsible for the people who report to them. Wilkins said they should be a part of this process. \u201cIt holds them accountable in two ways \u2014 one, accountable to address the bad behavior that\u2019s already happened, and it also makes them aware that they\u2019re also going to be held accountable for future bad behavior,\u201d Wilkins said. She said that in the past, supervisors have asked Title what they thought about the situation and asked for advice. At the level, Wilkins said some minor change to the Title policy should be going to the president\u2019s cabinet this week. This includes adding prevention of discrimination. Alexandra Hendricks 39 Files \u2013 the breakdown Out of 39 cases the Herald received, five files had male complainants, 31 files had female complainants, two files had complainants from two genders and one case file\u2019s complainant gender could not be determined. There were 36 case files with male respondents and 3 case files with female respondents. The records show that the university found violations of the Title policy in 12 of the 39 cases investigated did not redact the names of faculty or staff members who were found to have violated the policy in those instances. The files varied in size ranging from 15 pages to 293, totaling to 5,884 pages, varying based on the number of witnesses interviewed, evidence and who handled the case. \u201cThe only difference, and this is very innocent, is [that] you got two different people in charge,\u201d Wilkins said. \u201cJoshua Hayes is very detail oriented and he documents everything and keeps everything so that\u2019s why you\u2019ll see a whole lot more in his files.\u201d Before June 30, 2015, the Director of the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and the Title coordinator was Huda Melky, who retired. The variance in the case files extends to how much is redacted. One example is in Case from the 2016 open records request, where words from WKU\u2019s own Discrimination and Harassment Policy from April 1, 2013, were redacted from the file the university turned over to the Herald. \u201cThis policy does not supersede or replace any grievance or complaint procedures contained in the [redacted] Handbook,\u201d the case file stated. There is another one word redaction in the \u201cMembers of the University Committee\u201d subsection and several one word redactions in the \u201cConsensual Relationship\u201d subsection. \u201cIt is impossible to understand why the university would redact part of a university policy that is otherwise publicly available,\u201d Abate said. \u201cThere is no good-faith basis for doing so.\u201d Alexandra Hendricks Cases to note Within the records the Herald received, most of the names of those faculty and staff investigated were redacted. However, 12 records where found violations occurred or likely occurred did include the employee names. One of the 39 cases, Case from the Herald\u2019s 2021 open records request, is a student employee vs. student employee Title and Title report and investigation. The events on this file revolve around two former student employees at the Herald during the 2019-20 year. The files consist of emails and handwritten notes and do not have any formal memos stating whether or not the respondent violated any policies. Investigators recommended that the person accused complete two training sessions, and that person was not hired back at the Herald. The Herald is disclosing this information about this case to hold itself to the same standard as WKU. Alexandra Hendricks Cases with violations Kenneth Johnson Case Kenneth Johnson, former assistant director of student activities, was investigated for violating the sexual misconduct policy in 2014 after a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment. In the complaint, the student said on several occasions that Johnson threatened to place a hold on her TopNet account to prevent her from registering for classes if she did not stop by his office to visit him and have dinner with him. The student said she initially thought Johnson had the authority to place a hold on her account, but later found out that he could not do that. Before learning that, she agreed to have dinner with him had knots in my stomach. It bothered me how he used his position as a form of manipulation,\u201d the student stated in the report. The student said she had seen other students experience similar occurrences with Johnson. In the investigation interviewed 24 witnesses. Some denied experiencing or witnessing any form of harassment. Other witnesses mentioned trying to avoid Johnson, hearing rumors about him dating or having \u201cflings\u201d with female students, saying Johnson was \u201cclose\u201d with female students. One witness said, \u201cIt was a running joke that if you wanted to get ahead, you would sleep with Kenneth.\u201d Another witness said Johnson would take her to lunch and dinner, one-on-one, approximately three times per week. He would pick her up at her home, and would play \u201cromantic\u201d music. Johnson had purchased alcohol for both of them at dinners. Based on the findings of the investigation, Johnson violated WKU\u2019s Standards of Conduct policy and Discrimination and Harassment policy in addition to Title of the Educational Amendments of 1972. The file does not indicate if Johnson retired or resigned, but he is no longer employed at WKU. Other violations found Case B, from the 2016 request, involved Colleen Donovan, an academic readiness instructor, who found had violated the university\u2019s discrimination and harassment policy, according to the investigation in May 2014 female student in her class filed a complaint because she notified Donovan that she would need to miss a few classes due to medical reasons. Donovan told her that she does not accept medical excuses, that no one could help her, and that according to her syllabus if a student is absent from three classes the student\u2019s grade drops to the next lower grade. Donovan was no longer employed at the university after May 2014. Case C, from the 2016 open records request, involved Timothy Mullin, former director of the Kentucky Museum and Library, who was investigated for violating the sexual misconduct policy and gender based discrimination after he made sexual comments towards others. The records include complaints that surfaced of him sexually harassing male students and belittling and berating the female employees he supervised. Mullin died in 2020. Case D, from the 2016 request, involved Steve Briggs, assistant director of Housing and Residence Life, who found had violated the university\u2019s sexual misconduct policy after an informal complaint filed by a female student on Nov. 12, 2014 university employee complained that Briggs rubbed her arm and poked her arm in the hallway, then approached her from behind and rested his hands on her hips. When she moved away, Briggs said, \u201cIt\u2019s just me.\u201d On Sep. 9, 2015, Briggs submitted a letter of resignation. Case E, from the 2021 open records request, involved Jim Hills, an events associate for WKU, who terminated on June 4, 2019, after the Title investigation regarding him concluded found that Hills would discuss inappropriate sexual matters with student workers. According to the document, Hills would compliment body parts, talk about women and stare in an uncomfortable way while setting up events with student workers, based on witness statements. Case F, from the 2021 request, involved Keith Clark, a senior academic advisor, who found had violated the sexual misconduct policy in 2018 after a complaint was filed on March 18. Clark had been sending Facebook messages to a University of Louisville employee from March 13- 17. He sent the employee a video of him \u201cspanking/paddling\u201d himself. He also sent her a photo of him bent over a stool, wearing an apron, spanking his bare bottom with a paddle. Clark resigned from the university. Case F, from the 2016 request, follows an investigation against Michael Kallstrom, a professor in the music department. On Sept. 3, 2015 began looking into a report from an- other faculty member who expressed concern about Kallstrom\u2019s interactions with a student. The student said she went with a friend to see Kallstrom, and while the friend turned to answer a phone call, Kallstrom put his hand on her thigh. The university found that Kallstrom violated the university policy. He retired shortly after. Case G, from the 2021 records request, investigated a complaint that was received on Jan. 31, 2018, about Bryan Carson, coordinator of research instruction, grants and assessment. The complaint was in response to recurring incidents after a complaint against Carson in 2011. Based on the record, Carson made female employees and students feel unsafe around him. On Feb. 28, 2018, Carson resigned and was listed as ineligible for rehire at WKU. He then went to work at Missouri Valley College. Case A, from the 2021 request, investigated Ron Mitchell, an associate professor at WKU. On Oct. 3, 2017, Lisa Schneider, assistant to Athletics Director Todd Stewart, called Joshua Hayes to tell him about an issue with Mitchell and a female student. According to the documents provided, Mitchell invited the student to his house for lunch. He picked her up from Diddle Arena, took her to a \u201cbig house,\u201d went to a restaurant and then went to a different house. At the second house, Mitchell massaged her legs, back and feet, and continuously told her to release. During the massage, he told her that her clothes were dirty and that she needed to change into clothes he had for her. She said no. The student said no to the massage when he reached her upper thigh. She said Mitchell unfastened her bra, according to the documents, even though she said no. In an in-person conversation with Schneider and the student, Hayes asked how the student remained calm, she typed the answer on her phone felt sick. But was scared so could not say no.\u201d Mitchell resigned from the university on Oct. 18, 2017. Case C, from the 2021 request, investigated a complaint filed by an anonymous employee against Tim Boyer, access control locksmith, to the Title office in November 2020. On Nov. 17 at 10:10 am, there was an incident that was recorded by surveillance mentioned in the emails. \u201cWhile [redacted] was searching the key file storage, Tim rolled across the workshop floor in his office chair and positioned himself behind her while she was seated on the roller stool. The shop video shows Tim straddled within inches of her back and torso leaning over her shoulder. [Redact- ed] said she could feel his upper body/chest touching her back. The encounter lasted approximately one minute.\u201d In an email from Deborah Wilkins, she said there were three issues she thought were important to the case: there is video evidence regarding the complaint, Boyer is an \u201cat will\u201d employee so he can be terminated at any point, and Boyer had no meaningful excuse for his behavior in the video found that Boyer violated the sex and gender-based harassment, discrimination and retaliation policy. He was immediately terminated. Case D, from the 2021 request, dealt with Muhammad Sajjad, visiting assistant professor in physics and astronomy, who was \u201cdiscontinued\u201d and ineligible for rehire because a violation of policy was found. According to the records, the student told Hayes that she was standing by Sajjad\u2019s desk in the classroom behind the computer, and Sajjad was standing beside her, and his genitals were hitting her outer thigh. She clarified that Sajjad rubbed his genitals against her thigh in a side to side movement. Hayes asked how long Sajjad rubbed himself against her. She said Sajjad rubbed himself against her the entire time she was alphabetizing the exams, which took about five minutes. Case E, from the 2016 request, investigated a complaint that was filed against Brent Fisk, visual and performing arts library senior circulation assistant. According to the complaint, Fisk left his Pinterest ac-count open showing naked \u2014 \u201cspecifically topless\u201d \u2014 women on March 25, 2014. The incident was considered inappropriate use of technology. Co-workers said they felt uncomfortable around him since they were the same age and \u201ctype\u201d of women in the images Fisk had been looking at. From the documents provided, it is not clear whether Fisk resigned or was terminated from the university, but he did not continue to work at after 2015. Alexandra Hendricks Cases with no violations The majority of the cases the Herald received were reports where no violation against university policies were determined. Cases and from the 2021 open records request had enough detail to be described thoroughly. Case On May 2, 2018, a student reached out to Peggy Crowe, director of the Counseling Center, about an email he had received from his Interdisciplinary Studies instructor that caused concern. The lead up to this email had been a conversation about planning a trip with the instructor and other students that the complainant would no longer be able to attend. Upon discovering the student could no longer attend the trip, the respondent sent an emotional response telling the complainant not to show up to the next class meeting he was supposed to attend as a peer mentor have a few days to deal with my loss and definitely do not want to fall apart in front of the class,\u201d the response from the employee in the file stated. From this interaction, the report and ensuing investigation revealed a long-time mentor-mentee relationship between the complainant and respondent. Instances involving heavily emotional conversations on the part of the respondent, multiple trips to conferences, a specific conversation involving bowties and Chippendale dancers and appearing in the complainant\u2019s personal life were discussed in the investigation. As the final email included in the file, the documents state that on Aug. 7, 2018, Hayes spoke to the respondent where he shared his findings and reminded him of three previously discussed points \u2014 encouraging the respondent to receive counseling, \u201cdiscouraging him from personal travel with students\u201d and having a separate room when traveling with students for work did not find a violation. Case On Sept. 17, 2018, a student reported a theater professor teaching Acting for the Camera whose name was redacted. The professor told the student, while she was undressed for a scene, that she could receive an \u201ceasy A.\u201d Other students urged her to report what happened due to a similar incident that occurred prior. In an interview with Hayes, the professor denied ever making the comment. The student was cast in a script written in a screenwriting class that one witness described as \u201cborderline pornographic.\u201d The student emailed the professor stating she was un- comfortable, to which the professor responded that they needed to talk further and that his \u201chands were tied.\u201d The student told a dance instructor who encouraged her to report the incident and said it was \u201cunacceptable.\u201d During the investigation, 15 witnesses were interviewed. One witness said that removing clothing for the \u201cfake porn\u201d scene was optional. Several witnesses mentioned not having any concerns about the professor, one referred to him as a \u201cfather figure.\u201d Other witnesses mentioned not feeling comfortable around him result of the investigation was a two-week period for students to decide if they are comfortable with their assigned script being added to the course syllabus. The professor was told to refrain from joking with students unless they have a \u201cmutual cohesive relationship.\u201d No violation of Title was found during this investigation. The investigation ended on Dec. 13, 2018. Herald staffers Michael J. Collins, Anna Leachman, Megan Fisher, Jacob Latimer, Shane Stryker, Jake Moore and Leo Bertucci contributed to this story. Digital News Editor Debra Murray can be reached at [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter @debramurrayy Editor-in-Chief Lily Burris can be reached at lily.burris203@topper. wku.edu. Follow her on Twitter @lily_burris."} |
7,285 | James David Christie | College of the Holy Cross | [
"7285_101.pdf",
"7285_102.pdf",
"7285_103.pdf",
"7285_104.pdf",
"7285_105.pdf",
"7285_106.pdf"
] | {"7285_101.pdf": "grave abuse\u2019: Holy Cross investigation finds former organ instructor responsible for sexual misconduct James David Christie resigned from the college after allegations surfaced last year. By James David Christie in 2000. Hiroyuki Ito/Getty Images Caroline Anders 2/22/25, 10:39 grave abuse\u2019: Holy Cross investigation finds former organ instructor responsible for sexual misconduct 1/4 An internationally renowned organist and former instructor at Worcester\u2019s College of the Holy Cross has been found responsible for multiple instances of sexual harassment and misconduct, the school announced Tuesday. James David Christie resigned from his position as artist-in-residence and instructor at Holy Cross last year after he was accused of misconduct. The school began an investigation despite his departure. Holy Cross president Rev. Philip L. Boroughs wrote in a Tuesday statement that the school found Christie\u2019s actions \u201crepresent a serious violation of our standards for conduct and a grave abuse of Mr. Christie\u2019s position at the College.\u201d ADVERTISEMENT: Christie also played with the Boston Symphony Orchestra for decades, played at Wellesley College, and taught at Oberlin College and Conservatory in Ohio. Oberlin conducted a similar investigation into Christie last year after receiving a report that he engaged in inappropriate behavior with its students. After Christie also resigned from that college, its investigation concluded that \u201cMr. Christie in all likelihood grossly abused his position of trust\u201d and violated multiple college policies statement from the Boston Symphony Orchestra called Holy Cross\u2019s recent findings \u201cdeeply disturbing\u201d and said the organization ended its relationship with Christie after allegations surfaced last year. ADVERTISEMENT: The Boston Globe reported that former Holy Cross students wrote Boroughs a letter in August 2018 saying Christie was \u201can imminent danger to students on your campus.\u201d Both the Holy Cross and Oberlin investigations into the organist began shortly thereafter. July 11, 2019 1 minute to read 2/22/25, 10:39 grave abuse\u2019: Holy Cross investigation finds former organ instructor responsible for sexual misconduct 2/4 Multiple Holy Cross alums told The Boston Globe stories of unwanted touching and inappropriate comments from Christie. At least two told the paper their relationships with Christie involved heavy drinking and unprotected sex. The timeline of allegations ranges from 1994 to 2017. Boroughs thanked those who came forward with allegations against Christie and announced steps Holy Cross will take to prevent future misconduct, including new training on sexual misconduct and professional boundaries for college employees. The president\u2019s statement said any organization seeking employment verification or references for Christie will be informed of the investigation\u2019s findings. Christie is also barred from Holy Cross properties and events. Most Popular In Related News Karen Read case: Judge sheds more light on \u2018grave concern\u2019 1 Police search for man who turned a Beverly bar into his \u2018personal bathroom\u2019 2 Marchand twists the knife agai Tkachuks after Canada's win 3 2/22/25, 10:39 grave abuse\u2019: Holy Cross investigation finds former organ instructor responsible for sexual misconduct 3/4 \u00a92025 Plagiarism probe finds some problems with former Harvard president Claudine Gay\u2019s work Buildings on Holy Cross campus evacuated in response to bomb threat Holy Cross takes measures to tamp down coronavirus outbreak following dozens of new cases Tell Us What You Think 2/22/25, 10:39 grave abuse\u2019: Holy Cross investigation finds former organ instructor responsible for sexual misconduct 4/4", "7285_102.pdf": "Holy Cross finds former college organist sexually harassed students Christie banned from campus, awards revoked; restitution to be determined Mark Sullivan [email protected] Published 5:51 p.m June 20, 2019 Updated 4:06 p.m Sept. 8, 2022 - The College of the Holy Cross has completed an investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against former college organist James David Christie and found Mr. Christie subjected students to \u201cprohibited sexual harassment,\u201d according to a notice from the college that was emailed to complainants last week. The penalties to be brought by the college include a black mark on Mr. Christie\u2019s employment record, a permanent ban from campus, and revocation of any past honors and awards. Restitution for the victims remains to be determined. More: Professor accused of sexual misconduct no longer at Holy Cross The college will issue a public statement to the Holy Cross community announcing the ruling and penalties against Mr. Christie as soon as a period set aside for appeals has concluded, a spokesman for the college, John Hill, said Thursday. Two of the alumni who made the accusations against their former organ teacher commented Thursday: \"Holy Cross reached the only result it could - that James David Christie violated College policy. \"The College has indicated it will now discuss remedial measures with us,\" the two former students, Jacob Street and Sean Redrow, said in a joint text message. \"We are waiting to see if the College, as Christie's employer, takes substantive responsibility for Christie's egregious misconduct and its impact on all of us.\" Mr. Street and Mr. Redrow were among five former holders of the college\u2019s coveted Organ Scholarship who last summer publicly accused Mr. Christie, the college\u2019s distinguished artist- in-residence and one of the most acclaimed organists of his generation, of sexual misconduct. 2/22/25, 10:39 Holy Cross finds former college organist sexually harassed students 1/4 Mr. Christie resigned and was barred from campus. Holy Cross launched what the college\u2019s president, the Rev. Philip Boroughs, pledged would be an \u201caggressive and thorough\u201d review of the allegations against the organist, who was accused of having pressed himself sexually on student proteges, even in the organ loft of the campus chapel. Tracy Kennedy, director of the college\u2019s Office of Title Initiatives, responsible for investigating reports of sexual misconduct on campus, sent an email June 14 to the former students who had lodged the complaints against Mr. Christie, summarizing the findings of the investigation and the sanctions to be assigned. Mr. Redrow posted excerpts to his Facebook page on Saturday Title has spoken,\u201d he wrote. \u201cOur part still to be figured out.\u201d The Telegram & Gazette independently verified the content of the email the Holy Cross administrator sent the complainants. Ms. Kennedy wrote that an investigatory panel had concluded that Mr. Christie - never named in the communication, but referred to only as \u201cthe Responding Party\u201d - had engaged in unwelcome and inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature that constituted prohibited sexual harassment. She described the sanctions handed down: Mr. Christie\u2019s employment record with the college would reflect he had been terminated for cause; a campus no-trespass order against him would be made permanent; and any past awards or honors to him from the college would be revoked. She wrote that Mr. Christie did not elect to participate in the investigation or resolution process, was not interviewed, and did not review or respond to the investigation report. He cannot appeal the result. Mr. Christie, 67, of Natick, has been influential in classical music circles as an organist for the Boston Symphony Orchestra and Wellesley College, as well as Holy Cross and Oberlin College. In August, the former Organ Scholars wrote to Rev. Boroughs and told their story to The Boston Globe, which reported their allegations of lewd comments, unwanted touching and sexual misconduct by Mr. Christie at Holy Cross between 1994 and 2017. Oberlin College in February announced the results of its own investigation into similar allegations against Mr. Christie, finding the organist \u201cin all likelihood grossly abused his 2/22/25, 10:39 Holy Cross finds former college organist sexually harassed students 2/4 position of trust.\u201d According to a former student, Mr. Christie\u2019s nickname at the Ohio college was \u201cthe Harvey Weinstein of the Music Department.\u201d Phone and email messages to Mr. Christie this week were not returned. Contacted in person at his home in South Natick in November, he declined to comment. The former Holy Cross Organ Scholars who raised the allegations are Mr. Redrow (class of 1998), Mr. Street (class of 2010), Jeffrey Wood (class of 2006), Brett Maguire (class of 2002) and Jennifer McPherson (class of 2013). Holy Cross\u2019 Organ Scholarship, traditionally awarded every other year to a talented music major, provides full tuition (currently more than $52,000 annually) for four years, and is highly coveted New York has described it as \u201cperhaps the most prestigious scholarship for the organ in America.\u201d With the scholarship comes the responsibility of playing the 52-foot-high, 10-ton baroque pipe organ in Holy Cross\u2019 St. Joseph\u2019s Chapel at Masses and other college events, and assisting the college organist with all aspects of the chapel music program. Until last summer, that meant studying and working closely with Mr. Christie, who had been considered one of the most distinguished organ teachers in the nation, influential in the making of aspiring musicians\u2019 careers. The accusations against Mr. Christie were the first in a series of allegations of faculty sexual misconduct that have roiled the campus of New England\u2019s oldest Jesuit college over the past year. Misconduct claims also were made public against Christopher Dustin, a philosophy professor who was removed as dean of faculty and placed on leave after allegations were brought to light of unwanted sexual advances made upon former students. Meantime, students demanding greater transparency about sexual assault at the college created an Instagram page for posting anonymous accounts of date rape on campus, and in February staged a two-day sit-in outside the office of the college president. In April, Rev. Boroughs declined to retain an independent investigator to look into allegations of faculty sexual misconduct at the college, despite being urged to do so by faculty leaders. The Faculty Assembly voted to call on the board of trustees to appoint an independent counsel nonetheless. 2/22/25, 10:39 Holy Cross finds former college organist sexually harassed students 3/4 Last month, 87 members of the faculty signed a letter describing frustration at what was termed the administration\u2019s \u201cunwillingness to answer questions central to this brewing crisis.\u201d Many faculty members at the college\u2019s 173rd commencement exercises wore teal stoles with their academic regalia as a mark of solidarity with survivors of harassment and assault. Video: Worcester By Bike 2/22/25, 10:39 Holy Cross finds former college organist sexually harassed students 4/4", "7285_103.pdf": "Sexual misconduct allegations raise concerns at Holy Cross Sarah Connell Sanders Worcester Magazine Published 4:00 a.m Jan. 24, 2019 Former students at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester say the school has not adequately responded to allegations of sexual misconduct against two professors. In one case, multiple sources from inside Holy Cross have confirmed to Worcester Magazine the 2018 demotion of former Holy Cross Dean Christopher A. Dustin amid sexual misconduct allegations brought forward by a recent alumna. Without detailing the circumstances, the school recently announced Dustin will be on leave during the spring 2019 semester. In a separate instance in August 2018, five former recipients of the College\u2019s Organ Scholarship came forward with serious allegations against former organ professor James David Christie. Multiple sources from within Holy Cross indicate the cases of Dustin and Christie are emblematic of a much larger problem LEAVE\u2019 In the case of Dustin, a 2017 Holy Cross graduate speaking on the condition of anonymity said complications arose in 2015 when she was a junior and was invited to take Dustin\u2019s seminar, which she said is typically reserved for sophomores. Soon thereafter, according to the former student, she was handpicked by Dustin for a work-study position in his department despite the fact she was not on the list of students approved for work-study. As a senior in fall 2016, the former student said she felt pressured to write her Senior Honors Thesis under Dustin\u2019s mentorship. What followed, she said, included romantic advances and explicit sexually-charged comments, which eventually gave way to intimidating behavior and an abuse of power regarding her thesis grade in spring 2017. 2/22/25, 10:39 Sexual misconduct allegations raise concerns at Holy Cross 1/4 \u201cAt first, Professor Dustin would compliment me all the time,\u201d the former student said. \u201cHe did a good job at making me feel special. In hindsight know this was psychological grooming. But over time, this evolved into explicit romantic advances, many of which were over email. He repeatedly suggested we go on \u2018dates\u2019 or get drinks together. He bought me gifts, two of which included a bouquet of pink flowers [given to her on the day of a school- sponsored dinner] and an item which had the message love you\u2019 inscribed on it.\u201d Dustin\u2019s overtures turned more serious in nature, the former student said. \u201cAs time went on,\u201d she said, \u201chis language became more sexually charged. He told me was \u2018hot\u2019 and said that he would \u2018love to see\u2019 my body. He told me he didn\u2019t want to \u2018share me\u2019 with anyone else and to stay away from certain other people. Once began to resist his behavior more clearly, he reacted with anger and hostility, at one point calling me a \u2018real bitch\u2019 and making other derogatory remarks. All the while, we never talked about my thesis. The year culminated in the total waste of an academic opportunity and a humiliating thesis presentation. It was a heartbreaking way to leave Holy Cross.\u201d According to the former student, in March 2017, two months before her graduation, the professor told her he was going to be appointed dean of the faculty. The following month, in April, she said she reported his behavior to Holy Cross\u2019s Title Office. In June that year, she said a member of the Title Office asked her if she had any interest in pursuing an informal resolution. She said she declined. According to the former student, the formal investigation, including an appeal on behalf of procedural error, stretched out over 20 months, during which time the professor continued to work with female students. In addition, according to multiple sources, he was permitted to maintain his role as dean, advise theses and teach courses for the entire period during which the initial investigation was underway. Following the formal investigation, according to documents provided to Worcester Magazine, the professor\u2019s interaction with female students was limited by the school. He was stripped of his title as dean and was no longer permitted to conduct private, one-on-one meetings or unsupervised communications with female students or junior employees, including e-mail. Still, he continued to teach on campus. Most recently, Dustin is listed as having taken a leave of absence. Dustin did not respond to an email seeking comment for this story spokesperson for Holy Cross would not elaborate on Dustin\u2019s status, saying the school does not comment on matters of employment. 2/22/25, 10:39 Sexual misconduct allegations raise concerns at Holy Cross 2/4 The school is also dealing with the fallout of allegations detailed in an August story in The Boston Globe by five Holy Cross Organ Scholars concerning Christie. The five had informed the College that Christie was \u201can imminent danger\u201d to students on campus. According to The Globe, Christie was immediately placed on administrative leave and submitted a letter of resignation. The article reported Christie had been at liberty to hand select and groom organ scholars at Holy Cross during which time he exhibited a consistent pattern of sexual harassment. \u201cFormer students also described a sexually charged environment that included lewd comments, large amounts of alcohol, and unwanted touching over a period between 1994 and 2017,\u201d The Globe reported. According to the five Organ Scholars, Holy Cross recently extended an offer of three counseling sessions to only one member of the group in response to their request of financial repairs for therapy. In a statement issued to Worcester Magazine, the Five Organ Scholars wrote, \u201cThis offer is an insult to that person and to all survivors, and demonstrates a shocking lack of concern and care for the other Organ Scholars suffering as a result of Holy Cross\u2019s negligence SAFETY\u2019 Members of the student body grew increasingly vocal regarding sexual misconduct on campus during the fall semester last year. The school shut down classes and activities for several hours on a Friday afternoon in November in the wake of an alleged bias-related assault on campus and other concerns. In early December, a group identifying themselves as sexual assault survivors at Holy Cross hand delivered a list of demands to the office of president Rev. Philip L. Boroughs. The group expressed particular concern about allegations made against two unidentified faculty members. In their letter, they sought to uncover the college\u2019s threshold for tolerating misconduct among faculty members with \u201cunfettered access to students.\u201d In a statement to Worcester Magazine regarding the letter, Holy Cross said, \u201c... Fr. Boroughs and members of his executive team have responded to say that they take these issues seriously and are committed to addressing them. We will be reviewing the letter carefully and look forward to working with members of the community on this issues.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:39 Sexual misconduct allegations raise concerns at Holy Cross 3/4 The survivors who appeared at Boroughs\u2019 door the morning of Tuesday, Dec. 4 bore a document stating, \u201cWe will not settle for a superficial, short-changed response. We commit to defending our legal right to safety and the necessary reallocation of the college\u2019s resources to ensure this safety.\u201d The group represents an online community called Sexual Assault on the Hill, where accounts of alleged rape and sexual assaults are shared anonymously in the name of solidarity for survivors at Holy Cross spokesperson from the Sexual Assault on the Hill account reached out to Worcester Magazine Dec. 2, saying, \u201cLaw protects students at educational institutions to learn in a safe environment, free from unlawful discrimination and violence. The reality is, there is no transparency in Title at Holy Cross. Moreover, even if individuals within Title at hold the best intentions, they must adjudicate crimes while also maintaining the public relations of our institution. \u201cThus, it is clear that their decisions are compromised and there are severe conflicts of interest that could lead to the compromise of their decisions. We believe this is especially true in the case of professors.\u201d According to Holy Cross, Boroughs is assembling a team to create a Sexual Respect and Conduct plan by March 31, which will incorporate feedback from community members and include concrete action steps. Boroughs\u2019 executive team has pledged to improve policies and processes related to Title IX. \u201cThe College is in the process of hiring a full-time dedicated Title and Non-Discrimination Investigator,\u201d the school said. 2/22/25, 10:39 Sexual misconduct allegations raise concerns at Holy Cross 4/4", "7285_104.pdf": "play_circle 2025 play_circle 4 DAYS0 HRS20 expand_circle_right Th \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 1/9 \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 2/9 James David Christie has resigned from his positions at Oberlin Cons Holy Cross - amidst claims of alleged sexual abuse of It has been announced this week that American organist, James David Christie has resig the Organ department at Oberlin Conservatory, in Oberlin, Ohio and as Artist-in-Reside Worcester, Massachusetts - amidst claims of alleged sexual abuse of male students bet \u201cSeveral of us were sexually abused by Prof. Christie while we were Holy Cross students recently wrote in a letter to current college President, Rev. Philip Boroughs. \u201cHoly Cross has enabled Prof. Christie\u2019s misconduct, and has a responsibility now to resp and decisively as possible,\u201d the students have demanded. \u201cThe college was informed of allegations of serious misconduct and immediately placed accordance with college policy \u2026 Mr. Christie has submitted a letter of resignation, and the College of the Holy Cross have today said in a statement. \u201cProfessor Christie was informed of these allegations and was placed on administrative l resigned, and no longer teaches at Oberlin,\u201d Oberlin Conservatory Dean Andrea Kalyn h | Quartetto Energie Nove's New CD: \u2018Smetana String Quartets Nos. 1 & 2 Composer \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 3/9 2025 Jascha Heifetz Violin Competition February 16, 2025 Ric Grenell Appointed as Interim Executive Director of the Kenned February 12, 2025 New England Conservatory Presen Violinist Joshua Bro February 11, 2025 \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 4/9 Every Voice with Terrance McKnight \u2014 Episode 4 \"The \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 5/9 Edmonton Symphony Orchestra Appoints New Music Director February 21, 2025 New Zealand Pianist Raises Funds for Cancer Treatment February 21, 2025 University of Melbou Names Recipient of t 2025 Sir Bernard He February 21, 2025 Win a Pair of Tickets to Janine Jansen's Upcoming Carnegie Ha February 21, 2025 Cellist Abel Selaocoe\u2019s New Album, \u201cHymns of Bantu February 21, 2025 Applications Open t 2025 Mirecourt International Violin February 21, 2025 14 22 \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 6/9 15 18 19 \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 7/9 The Violin Channel is the New York City-based leading international classical music news, media and streaming platform \u2014 with over 600,000+ social media and app devotees and an email subscription base of over 100,000 people, the platform consistently reaches in excess of 2,000,000 eyeballs worldwide each and every month. It comprehensively covers international classical music goings-on far beyond just the violin and strings, and \u201cThank you Violin Channel for creating such a wo platform in our industry Professor of Violin - New England Conservat \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 8/9 includes up-to-date industry news, masterclasses, competition coverage, interviews, educational resources, events, and concert livestreams, with a heavy focus on the promotion of highly promising young string soloists and ensembles. \u00a92023 The Violin Channel, All Rights Reserved \uf658 2/22/25, 10:40 Acclaimed Organ Professor Resigns From 2 Music Schools Amidst Sexual Allegations [#MeToo] 9/9", "7285_105.pdf": "Holy Cross releases investigators' report on sexual misconduct by faculty Published 2:15 p.m Sept. 8, 2022 Updated 7:29 a.m Sept. 9, 2022 \u2014 Concluding an eight-month investigation into the factors that enabled College of the Holy Cross faculty members to engage in multiple decades of sexual misconduct, investigators found, among other issues, an absence of written policies or procedures that govern professional boundaries. Between January and August 2022, investigators Gina Maisto Smith and Leslie Gomez, with the Philadelphia-based law firm Cozen O'Connor, conducted 75 interviews with alumni, students, staff and faculty, as well as an extensive document review. The college released the report published Tuesday. \u201cOur review is not a reinvestigation of prior incidents, nor are we seeking to retread ground that has already been fully investigated by the College or prior external investigators,\u201d they wrote in the report. \u201cOur goal in requesting and receiving individual narratives from survivors was to identify the manner in which abuse was reported to have occurred as it relates to cultural, structural, and organizational factors.\u201d The investigation was launched in the wake of allegations by students against former college organist James David Christie and former professor Christopher Dustin. The school received reports of misconduct involving Dustin in 2017 and Christie in 2018; those reports surfaced publicly during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 academic years. The college banned Christie from the campus in 2019, and cut ties with Dustin in 2020. Dustin has a pending federal lawsuit that accuses Holy Cross of firing him unfairly. Among the 75 people interviewed, 21 reported having experienced sexual misconduct while at Holy Cross in incidents spanning from the 1950s to the 2010s. Jeff A. Chamer Telegram & Gazette 2/22/25, 10:40 Holy Cross faculty sexual misconduct investigation findings released 1/5 Investigators also heard from 19 alumni and two faculty members who described \u201csexual and gender-based harassment and violence\u201d involving faculty and staff over a more than 60-year period. Additionally, investigators reviewed a litany of documents, which included all faculty sexual misconduct case files currently available in the Title office, records of reports of historical abuse, and letters and written accounts submitted by survivors. The investigators found several factors contributing to an environment that allowed faculty members to engage in sexual misconduct. List of factors revealed Such factors included a \u201cbreakdown in trust\u201d between faculty and administrators that led to \u201cnegative or counter-productive\u201d interactions between campus community members; gaps in reporting by faculty and staff and reluctance to embrace responsible employee reporting; and some departments with unprofessional working environments, bullying and incivility. Other \u201crelevant factors\u201d included: alumni described a difference of understanding in social norms regarding relationships between students and faculty members - both in earlier times and in the present issues that relate to power dynamics including actual and perceived power imbalances the impacts of tenure actual or perceived retaliation the perception that boundary violations were openly known and accepted by others, such that survivors believed the conduct was perceived by others as appropriate the nature of the college\u2019s response to reports, particularly if the perception or reality of that response was negative \u201cSome alumni, faculty, and staff members identified as a continuing concern the College\u2019s patriarchy and clericalism \u2014 the idea that a few individuals hold power and authority while others exercise deference to those who are in power,\u201d the report said. \u201cOther alumni, faculty, and staff members described the College as an institution that is susceptible to exceptionalism \u2014 the idea that the institution or its faculty, as a whole, are special or outside the norm of elite academic institutions.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:40 Holy Cross faculty sexual misconduct investigation findings released 2/5 Those interviewed in the investigation said they were concerned that Holy Cross\u2019 culture created a space for faculty members to \u201cact in manners that may not fall within professional boundaries,\u201d and that contributed to an environment where others may excuse \u201cpotential grooming behaviors,\u201d because the faculty members in question are \u201cviewed as special in some regard.\u201d The investigators also identified issues surrounding the college\u2019s approach to sexual orientation, gender, gender identify and gender expression. \u201cMany community members perceived a continued disconnect between traditional Catholic teachings regarding homosexuality, the College\u2019s stated approach, and the lived experiences of College students and alumni,\u201d the report said. \u201cSome individuals who identify as LGBTQIA+, particularly alumni, still report considerable shame based on their interactions with the College or the Catholic Church.\u201d Alumni contributions The report said investigators heard from many alumni who identify as gay or bisexual who said that the college\u2019s culture created a \u201cheightened vulnerability\u201d for abuse by faculty and staff because of their sexual orientation. It allowed the faculty and staff to take advantage of \u201ctheir naivete\u0301 and youth and exploited pre-existing barriers to reporting.\u201d The report also said that, when issues are reported, the absence of effective structures can allow those in power to discount or downplay the reports. Holy Cross was also delayed in strengthening its Title program, compared to other educational institutions, the report said. \u201cNotably, the College did not have a functional and effective Title Office until 2015,\u201d the investigators said. \u201cAlthough the College had policies governing harassment dating back to 1992, and prohibited consensual relationships between faculty and students in 2004, the Title framework was new to the College, as was the role of a dedicated Title Coordinator.\u201d There was also confusion surrounding the role of the Title coordinator, according to the report, with some misunderstanding the purpose of the role. 2/22/25, 10:40 Holy Cross faculty sexual misconduct investigation findings released 3/5 \u201cSome misunderstood the role of the Title Office and believed it should have been an advocacy resource for survivors, as opposed to a neutral and impartial office tasked with prompt and equitable responses that seek to eliminate, prevent, and address reports of sex discrimination,\u201d the report said. The investigators also said that there was \u201csignificant\u201d instability between 2015 and 2020 in the Holy Cross Title office. The college had five different people, the report said, who served as Title coordinator, including some who served in an interim capacity, who were tasked with introducing and building an office that was new to the school common misperception we hear across the country is that Title offices are legalistic, not caring, compassionate, or empathetic,\u201d the report said. \u201cWe heard the same perception at the College.\u201d They said that perception derives from the \u201cprocedural rigor\u201d required in current Title regulations, not just at Holy Cross, but across the country. However, the report said, the perception may be particularly pertinent at Holy Cross given the \u201cconfluence of \u2018professionalization\u2019 efforts across the campus. \u201cIndividuals uniformly reported that community stakeholders deeply cared about the issues related to Title IX, but the misunderstanding of the Title Office\u2019s core functions may have inhibited its ability to effectively serve the community,\u201d the report said. EthicsPoint reporting portal Holy Cross has taken steps to improve the functions of the Title office, the report said, by streamlining the reporting process and increasing awareness, creating a centralized reporting webpage, and an investment into EthicsPoint, an anonymous reporting portal. The current Title coordinator has focused on building community awareness of the office\u2019s functions and the office has expanded, due to added resources, and now includes two investigators and an assistant director of prevention and education. In addition to reviewing the factors that contributed to allowing faculty sexual misconduct, investigators sought to provide recommendations for \u201cevidence-based actions to improve culture, restore trust, acknowledge accountability, and decrease student vulnerability.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:40 Holy Cross faculty sexual misconduct investigation findings released 4/5 The report recommended five main categories: restorative approaches \u201cto address the harms of the past\u201d preventive work \u201cto reduce the potential for sexual misconduct through enhanced educational programming\u201d strengthening structures, policies and practices \u201cto shift the conditions that may have allowed misconduct to occur\u201d foster increased reporting enhance responses and effective practice to reports when misconduct occurs The investigators also included a sixth recommendation: Ensure the process for implementing the recommendations has the appropriate hallmarks of trust, accountability, visibility and sustainability. \u201cTrust is built on a foundation of steady engagement and communication with representative constituents over a sustained period of time in a manner that demonstrates character, candor, care, competence, and collaboration,\u201d the report said. \u201cIn that regard, the way these recommendations are implemented is as important as the recommendations themselves.\u201d It said that Holy Cross\u2019s prevention efforts must be \u201cpan-institutional\u201d to be effective. \u201cThe responsibility for moving forward as an institution is a shared one, wherein administrators, faculty, the Board, and students all play a vital role in preventing sexual and gender-based harassment and violence,\u201d the investigators wrote. \u201cWhile the College can provide the framework in terms of policies, procedures, and practices, as well as educational programming, achieving cultural change must be a community effort.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:40 Holy Cross faculty sexual misconduct investigation findings released 5/5", "7285_106.pdf": "James David Christie Born 1952 Wisconsin, United States Education Oberlin Conservatory of Music, New England Conservatory of Music Known for Concert organist, professor James David Christie James David Christie (born 1952) is an American classical organist and teacher. Until accusations of sexual misconduct emerged in August 2018, he was Chair and Professor of Organ at the Oberlin Conservatory of Music, Distinguished Artist in Residence at the College of the Holy Cross, and College Organist at Wellesley College. He has been a frequent organist with the Boston Symphony Orchestra since 1978, and has made several commercial recordings. Former employers include Boston Conservatory of Music, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Boston University.[1][2] Christie was born in Wisconsin in 1952 and first studied organ there with Byron Blackmore for five years. In 1970 he enrolled at the Oberlin Conservatory of Music, studying with David Boe, graduating in 1975 with a B.Mus. degree. He then attended the New England Conservatory, where he earned an M.M. in 1977, and an A.D. in 1978, studying with Yuko Hayashi. Christie was awarded an honorary Doctor of Fine Arts degree from the New England School of Law, and an Outstanding Alumni Award from the New England Conservatory. In 1979 he became the first American to win the International Organ Competition of the Bruges Early Music Festival, and the first competitor to win both the First Prize and the Audience Prize.[1][2] Christie has performed more than 50 concert tours of Europe, Japan, and Australia, and has served on over 40 international competition juries. He has performed premiers of over 40 works. He has served regularly on the faculty of McGill University's Summer Organ Academy in Montreal, Canada. Christie has been a guest professor at the Paris Conservatory, Cracow Conservatory, Royal Conservatory of Brussels, Conservatory of Versailles, Dom Bedos Organ Academy in Bordeaux, International Summer Organ Academy in Haarlem (Netherlands), and other educational institutions. He has performed and recorded with symphony orchestras in London, Stuttgart, Vienna, Koblentz, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, and Baltimore. In 2017 he received the \"International Performer of the Year\" award from the American Guild of Organists (AGO).[3] Several of his student organists have gone on to win national and international competitions.[1][2] Early life and education Professional highlights 2/22/25, 10:40 James David Christie - Wikipedia 1/3 On August 23, 2018, The Boston Globe published an article describing decades of Christie's alleged sexual misconduct at College of the Holy Cross, soon after five former students jointly wrote to the college president, calling Christie \"an imminent danger to students on your campus.\" As one graduate summarized the pressure for scholarship students to tolerate the misconduct: \"He's the best organ teacher in America, and he could destroy your dreams.\" Christie was quickly suspended by Holy Cross and Oberlin, and he resigned from both colleges as they began internal investigations.[3] He also \"discontinued his services\" at Wellesley,[4] and the revoked his \"International Performer of the Year\" award.[5] The Oberlin investigation concluded: \"There is evidence that Mr. Christie in all likelihood grossly abused his position of trust and violated Oberlin College's Discrimination and Harassment Policy, Sexual Misconduct Policy, and professional code of conduct.\"[6] The Holy Cross investigation concluded: \"Mr. Christie has been found responsible for multiple violations of the College\u2019s prohibitions on sexual harassment and misconduct.\"[7] The 1985 Taylor & Boody Organ \u2013 College of the Holy Cross (JAV) Sweelinck: Organ Works (Naxos) 1. \"James David Christie\" ( academics/programs/music/james-david-christie). College of the Holy Cross. Archived from the original ( on October 29, 2016. Retrieved August 27, 2018. 2. \"James David Christie\" ( ervatory/faculty/faculty-detail.dot?id=20645). Oberlin College & Conservatory. Archived from the original ( on May 15, 2017. Retrieved August 28, 2018. 3. \"Colleges cut ties with acclaimed Boston-area concert organist amid sex allegations\" ( bostonglobe.com/arts/music/2018/08/23/colleges-cut-ties-with-acclaimed-boston-area-concert-org anist-amid-sex-allegations/EB43oub6zLAYH7xzNnBGbN/story.html). The Boston Globe. August 23, 2018. Retrieved August 24, 2018. 4. \"Organist James David Christie parts with Holy Cross, Wellesley College following allegations of sexual misconduct over decades\" ( mes_david_christie_resigns_f.html). MassLive. August 24, 2018. Retrieved August 28, 2018. 5. \"Dean's Message\" ( 09newsletter.pdf) (PDF). Newsletter. The New York City Chapter of the American Guild of Organists. September 2018. Archived from the original ( er.pdf) (PDF) on December 3, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018. 6. \"Sexual Misconduct Investigation Concludes\" ( s://oberlinreview.org/18244/uncategorized/sexual-misconduct-investigation-concludes/). Oberlin Review. March 8, 2019. Archived from the original ( sexual-misconduct-investigation-concludes/) on June 21, 2019. Findings of misconduct Selected recordings References 2/22/25, 10:40 James David Christie - Wikipedia 2/3 7. \"Important Message\" ( message-2019-july-09). College of the Holy Cross. July 9, 2019. Retrieved July 16, 2019. James David Christie publicity page ( certartists.com/JDC.html). Archived on April 27, 2016. Retrieved from \" External links 2/22/25, 10:40 James David Christie - Wikipedia 3/3"} |
7,700 | Ram D. Gopal | University of Connecticut | [
"7700_101.pdf",
"7700_102.pdf"
] | {"7700_101.pdf": "1 D. GOPAL, Plaintiff, v REITZ, Defendants. No. 3:19-cv-01810 Ram Gopal (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d) has sued the University of Connecticut, Susan Herbst, Craig Kennedy, John Elliot, Bruce Gelston, and Stephanie Reitz (collectively, \u201cDefendants\u201d) for their alleged involvement in his termination under Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution\u2019s Due Process Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s Equal Protection Clause. Defendants have moved to dismiss Mr. Gopal\u2019s Complaint. For the reasons stated below, Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss is A. Factual Allegations On September 1, 1993, Rom Gopal, an Asian-American male, began working at the University of Connecticut (\u201cUCONN\u201d). Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 4, 14 No. 1 (Nov. 15, 2019). Mr. Gopal worked for until the termination of his employment on August 19, 2018. Compl. \u00b6 14. At the time of his termination, Mr. Gopal held the position of Operations Information Management Endowed Professor and Department Head at the University of Connecticut 2 School of Business (\u201cOPIM\u201d). Id. at \u00b6 4. Mr. Gopal alleges that, for the entirety of his employment at UCONN, he was a \u201cconscientious, hard-working and successful employee,\u201d and that he \u201creceived exemplary performance evaluations\u201d throughout his tenure. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 15\u201316. On or about December 15, 2017, however, Susan Herbst, President of UCONN, Craig Kennedy, Provost of UCONN, and John Elliot, Dean of the School of Business, started an investigation against of Mr. Gopal in response to an anonymous complaint about departmental travel policy violations. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 6\u20138, 17\u201318. The anonymous complaint allegedly did not identify Mr. Gopal as the person in violation of said policies, but instead stated that the violations were being made by \u201ca department head at OPIM,\u201d a position also held by white professors. Id. at \u00b6 26. Bruce Gelston, an associate compliance officer in the University\u2019s Office of Compliance, conducted the investigation, allegedly at the instruction of President Herbst, Provost Kennedy and Dean Elliot. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 9, 23\u201325. On or about May 22, 2018, Mr. Gelston submitted a Final Report to President Herbst, Provost Kennedy, and Dean Elliot. Id. at \u00b6 30. The Final Report concluded that Mr. Gopal violated UCONN\u2019s travel policy. Id. On July 26, 2018 Dean Elliot notified Mr. Gopal of his recommendation that Mr. Gopal be terminated, based on the findings in Mr. Gelston\u2019s Report. Id. at \u00b6 41. On August 29, 2018, Mr. Gopal met with the Defendants and they allegedly told him, he would be fired, if he did not resign. Id. at \u00b6 42. Mr. Gopal allegedly became eligible for a full pension on September 1, 2018, but allegedly had to resign two days before that date. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 44, 46\u201348. Mr. Gopal alleges that he later learned that his resignation had been characterized 3 publicly as \u201cnot in good standing.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 48. Mr. Gopal also alleges that all of the findings of the University regarding him were allegedly made public in the Hartford Courant on September 11, 2018, Fox61 News on September 11, 2018, and the Journal Inquirer on September 20, 2018. Id. at \u00b6 59. Mr. Gopal alleges that the investigation conducted by the Defendants was \"racially motivated, overbroad, malicious, and intrusive.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 25. He further alleges that the investigation was completed with the \u201cpurpose[ful] exclu[sion] of evidence and witnesses.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 28. Mr. Gopal alleges that travel and overtime procedures enforced against him were ignored by non-minority employees, id. at \u00b6 34 and \u201cnon-minority employees\u201d with similar procedure violations \u201cwere not investigated or disciplined.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 36. In his Complaint, Mr. Gopal accuses all defendants of being aware that the School of Business had \u201cinept procedures that we not uniformly enforced.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 35. Mr. Gopal argues that he \u201cwas treated differently than other employees based upon his race. . . color, national origin, and ancestry.\u201d Id. at \u00b6 51. B. Procedural History On October 2, 2019, Mr. Gopal received a Release of Jurisdiction letter from from the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. Id. at \u00b6 81. On November 4, 2019, he received a Right to Sue letter from the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Id. at \u00b6 82. On November 5, 2019, Mr. Gopal filed his Complaint No. 1. On February 5, 2020 Mr. Gopal and Defendants filed a report on their Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting No.17 (Feb. 5, 2020). Two days later, on February 7, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal 4 Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6). Mot. to Dismiss No. 19 (Feb. 7, 2020), redacted to 41 (May 6, 2020) (\u201cDef. MTD\u201d). On March 20, 2020, Mr. Gopal filed an opposition memorandum in response to Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss. Mem. In Opp\u2019n No. 33 (Mar. 20, 2020) (\u201cPl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp\u2019n.\u201d). On May 11, 2020, Defendants filed their reply to Mr. Gopal\u2019s opposition memorandum. Reply to Resp. to Mot. to Dismiss No. 44 (May 11, 2020) (\u201cDef. Reply\u201d). On May 15, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Supplemental Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 49 (May 15, 2020). On May 20, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Supplemental Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 51 (May 20, 2020). On June 12, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Supplemental Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 52 (Jun. 12, 2020). On July 7, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Additional Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Additional Authority No. 53 (Jul. 7, 2020). On August 11, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Controlling Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 60 (Aug. 11, 2020). On August 14, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Controlling Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 63 (Aug. 14, 2020). On August 17, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Controlling Authority\u201d to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 65 (Aug. 17, 2020). On September 9, 2020, Defendants filed a \u201cNotice of Controlling Authority\u201d to support 5 of their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 69 (Sept. 9, 2020).1 On September 15, 2020, the Court held oral argument on the Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss. Min. Entry No. 70 (Sept. 15, 2020 In evaluating a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the court \u201cmust accept as true all material factual allegations in the complaint[,]\u201d but need not draw inferences favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction. Shipping Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Drakos, 140 F.3d 129, 131 (2d Cir. 1998). The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that subject matter jurisdiction is proper based on facts existing at the time he or she filed the complaint. Scelsa v. City Univ. of N.Y., 76 F.3d 37, 40 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal citations omitted).2 complaint must contain a \u201cshort and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.\u201d Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Any claim that fails \u201cto state a claim upon which relief can be granted\u201d will be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In reviewing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), a court applies a \u201cplausibility standard\u201d guided by \u201ctwo working principles.\u201d Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). First, \u201c[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.\u201d Id.; see also Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 1 Although Defendants have filed several supplemental authorities and have described some of them as \u201ccontrolling,\u201d to the extent they involve summary orders, they are not. While instructive, summary orders are not binding precedent. See Jackler v. Byrne, 658 F.3d 225, 244 (2d Cir. 2011) (\u201cUnder this Court's Rules, and as stated in the heading of our summary orders deciding appeals EFFECT.\u2019\u201d) (referencing 2d Cir. R. 32.1.1(a)) (emphasis in original). 2 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), a party may file a motion to dismiss due to \u201cinsufficient service of process.\u201d Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5). Although referred to in Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss, the Defendants have failed to provide an argument as to why Rule 12(b)(5) is applicable here. As a result, the Court will not address this argument. 6 555 (2007) (\u201cWhile a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations . . . a plaintiff\u2019s obligation to provide the \u2018grounds\u2019 of his \u2018entitle[ment] to relief\u2019 requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.\u201d (internal citations omitted)). Second, \u201conly a complaint that states a plausible claim for relief survives a motion to dismiss.\u201d Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679. Thus, the complaint must contain \u201cfactual amplification . . . to render a claim plausible.\u201d Arista Records v. Doe 3, 604 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Turkmen v. Ashcroft, 589 F.3d 542, 546 (2d Cir. 2009)). When reviewing a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the court takes all factual allegations in the complaint as true. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. The court also views the allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and draws all inferences in the plaintiff\u2019s favor. Cohen v. S.A.C. Trading Corp., 711 F.3d 353, 359 (2d Cir. 2013); see also York v. Ass\u2019n of the Bar of the City of N.Y., 286 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir. 2002) (\u201cOn a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accepting the complaint\u2019s allegations as true court considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) generally limits its review \u201cto the facts as asserted within the four corners of the complaint, the documents attached to the complaint as exhibits, and any documents incorporated in the complaint by reference.\u201d McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 482 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2007 court may also consider \u201cmatters of which judicial notice may be taken\u201d and \u201cdocuments either in plaintiffs\u2019 possession or of which plaintiffs had knowledge and relied on in bringing suit.\u201d Brass v. Am. Film Techs., Inc., 987 F.2d 142, 150 (2d Cir. 1993); Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc., 359 F. Supp. 2d 140, 144 (D. Conn. 2005). 7 The Defendants have moved to dismiss all three of Mr. Gopal\u2019s claims, the Title claim, the Due Process Claim, and the Equal Protection Clause claim, under several theories. The Court will address each of these claims in turn.3 A. The Title Claim In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), the Supreme Court established a burden-shifting framework to evaluate claims of employment discrimination and outlined the elements of a prima facie case. Consistent with this decision, in the Second Circuit, a plaintiff must show: (1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was qualified for his position; (3) he suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) there is \u201cat least minimal support for the proposition that the employer was motivated by discriminatory intent.\u201d Littlejohn v. City of N.Y., 795 F.3d 297, 311 (2d Cir. 2015 plaintiff's burden for establishing a prima facie case is de minimis. Woodman v. WWOR\u2013TV, Inc., 411 F.3d 69, 76 (2d Cir. 2005) (\u201cWe have characterized plaintiff's prima facie burden as \u2018minimal\u2019 and \u2018de minimis.\u2019\u201d) (citing Zimmermann v. Assocs. First Capital Corp., 251 F.3d 376, 381 (2d Cir. 2001)). In the initial pleading stage of litigation for a Title employment discrimination claim, \u201callegation of facts supporting a minimal plausible inference of discriminatory intent suffices...because this entitles the plaintiff to the temporary presumption of McDonnell Douglas until the defendant furnishes its asserted reasons for its action against the plaintiff.\u201d Doe 3 If information and exhibits outside the scope of Mr. Gopal\u2019s Complaint are considered, this Court must treat this motion as a motion for summary judgment. See Hernandez v. Coffey, 582 F.3d 303, 307 (2d Cir. 2009) (\u201cRule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, \u2018If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56.\u2019\u201d); see also Mayo v. Fed. Gov't, 558 F. App'x 55, 56 (2d Cir. 2014) (\u201c[A] court may convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment by considering extrinsic evidence. . .\u201d). Defendants, however, have requested that their filings be reviewed consistent with the motion to dismiss standard. As a result, the Court will proceed accordingly. 8 v. Columbia Univ., 831 F.3d 46, 55 (2d Cir. 2016); see also Dawson v. N.Y. City Transit Auth., 624 F. App'x 763, 770 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (\u201cAt the pleading stage, district courts would do well to remember th[e] exceedingly low burden that discrimination plaintiffs face....\u201d). The allegations need not, however, give \u201cplausible support to the ultimate question of whether the adverse employment action was attributable to discrimination.\u201d Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. Defendants seek to dismiss Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claim for several reasons. First, they argue that any such claims against the individual defendants should be dismissed because a Title claim may only be brought against his employer, UCONN. Def at 10. Second, they argue that the Title disparate treatment claims against fail because Mr. Gopal fails to plead even a minimal claim of racial discrimination. See id. at 14. In their view, by not providing specific examples of similarly situated employees being treated differently, Mr. Gopal has failed to show the minimal evidence required to move forward with his Title claim. Id. Defendants also argue that Mr. Gopal has no viable Title claim based on a hostile work environment. Id. at 14-16. Finally, Defendants argue that any Title claim suggesting a \u201ca pattern and practice\u201d of discrimination must be dismissed because this theory cannot be used in a private, non-class suit. Id. at 17. Mr. Gopal argues that he has sufficiently pled the necessary elements of a Title employment discrimination claim. In his view, he adequately has pled being (1) Asian- American, a member of a protected class; (2) qualified for the position he held; (3) subjected to an adverse employment action; and (4) having had an adverse action occur under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. Compl. \u00b6 70. Mr. Gopal also argues having properly alleged that, while he was not the only non-white dean in OPIM, his white colleagues were not 9 subjected to investigations after the received the anonymous letter alleging travel violations. Id. at \u00b6 36. As to the Defendants\u2019 argument that a Title claim can only be brought against UCONN, Mr. Gopal does not disagree and denies having brought a Title claim against any of the individual defendants. As Mr. Gopal points out, \u201cThere is not Title claim in the complaint against any individual defendant. The Complaint is clear [sic] actions and termination of plaintiff violated Title VII.\u201d Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 11 (citing Compl. \u00b6 80). As to the Defendants\u2019 argument about Mr. Gopal\u2019s alleged Title pattern and practice claim, again, Mr. Gopal denies having brought a separate and distinct pattern and practice claim, and instead makes an allegation of a broader practice of discrimination only as a means of supporting his disparate treatment claim. See Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 20-21 (\u201cThe plaintiff is not seeking to prove his claims via a Teamsters\u2019s method of proof. But the facts concerning defendants\u2019 practices are highly relevant.\u201d). Finally, as to Defendants\u2019 arguments about the insufficiency of his hostile environment claim, Mr. Gopal argues that his Complaint\u2019s allegations are sufficient. The Court agrees. First, the factual allegations in Mr. Gopal\u2019s Complaint are sufficient to state a claim for disparate treatment at this stage of the case. As the Second Circuit has noted, \u201cabsent direct evidence of discrimination, what must be plausibly supported by facts alleged in the complaint is that the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, was qualified, suffered an adverse employment action, and has at least minimal support for the proposition that the employer was motivated by discriminatory intent.\u201d Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. Mr. Gopal\u2019s Complaint satisfies this standard. See Compl. \u00b6 4 (Plaintiff is an \u201cAsian-American male\u201d); Id. at \u00b6 16 (alleging \u201cPlaintiff received 10 exemplary performance evaluations during his entire tenure); Id. at \u00b6 56 (alleging \u201cPlaintiff was subject to harassment, and false administrative charges by defendants, who . . . maintained them to harm plaintiff\u2019s employment and career\u201d); Id. at \u00b6 36 (alleging \u201cnon-minority employees had similar . . . violations and were not investigated or disciplined.\u201d). At this stage of the case, he is not required to \u201cgive plausible support to the ultimate question of whether the adverse employment action was attributable to discrimination.\u201d Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. Defendants\u2019 second and third arguments for dismissing Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claim, that the claim is brought against individual defendants, and is a pattern and practice claim, also fail. As Mr. Gopal has rightly noted, the Title claim is only against UCONN. See Compl. \u00b6 80 [sic] actions and termination of plaintiff violated Title VII\u201d). Defendants rightly note that a pattern and practice theory cannot be used in a private, non-class suit. See Chin v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 685 F.3d 135, 149 (2d Cir. 2012) (\u201cPermitting private plaintiffs to sue the pattern-or-practice method of proof outside the class action context would require us to extend this method beyond its current application. This we decline to do.\u201d). But, as Mr. Gopal also rightly points out, although \u201cthe pattern-or-practice method of proof,\u201d (a \u201cunique form of liability available in government actions,\u201d see id. at 147) is not available to prove his claim, \u201cproof that employer engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination may be of substantial help in demonstrating an employer\u2019s liability in the individual case.\u201d Id. at 149. As the Second Circuit in Chin made clear, a Title private plaintiff\u2019s proposed use of this alleged evidence \u201ccannot relieve the plaintiff of the need to establish each element of his or her claim,\u201d id., a critical distinction between Mr. Gopal\u2019s ordinary Title disparate treatment claim and the authority extended under Title to claims brought by the United States government. 11 Finally, Defendants\u2019 final argument for dismissing Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claim, the failure to plead a viable hostile work environment claim, suffers from the same flaw as their argument to dismiss the Title disparate treatment claim: the imposition of an evidentiary standard more appropriate for the summary judgment stage than now. To state a claim for a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, a plaintiff must plead facts alleging that the complained of conduct: (1) \u201cis objectively severe or pervasive\u2014that is, . . . creates an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive;\u201d (2) \u201ccreates an environment that the plaintiff subjectively perceives as hostile or abusive;\u201d and (3) \u201ccreates such an environment because of the plaintiff's [status in a protected class].\u201d Patane v. Clark, 508 F.3d 106, 113 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Gregory v. Daly, 243 F.3d 687, 691\u201392 (2d Cir. 2001)). Mr. Gopal has alleged an \u201cobjectively severe or pervasive . . . environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive.\u201d He alleges that, \u201cwithout any legitimate basis or allegation officials subjected him to \u201ca racially motivated, overbroad, malicious and intrusive investigation.\u201d Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 23, 25; see also Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 18. In his view, \u201cDefendants\u2019 hostile conduct occurred over a period of months culminating in a manipulative, oppressive and deceptive ouster.\u201d Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 18. And \u201ccreated an []abusive workplace based upon Plaintiff\u2019s race.\u201d Id. Ultimately, these allegations may not be supported by admissible evidence, but, at this time, they are sufficient to deny Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss. See Moll v. Telesector Res. Grp., Inc., 760 F.3d 198, 203 (2d Cir. 2014) (vacating and remanding decision granting motion to dismiss because \u201cthe district court erred when it failed to consider all allegations in the Complaint in their totality, including those that were not sexually offensive in nature.\u201d). \u201cTo 12 decide whether the threshold has been reached, courts examine the case-specific circumstances in their totality and evaluate the severity, frequency, and degree of the abuse.\u201d Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Because this Court must and has \u201cconsidered all incidents in their totality,\u201d id., the Court determines that Mr. Gopal adequately stated a hostile work environment claim. Accordingly, Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claim will be denied. B. The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Claim \"The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects persons against deprivations of life, liberty, or property; and those who seek to invoke its procedural protection must establish that one of these interests is at stake.\u201d Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 221 (2005). Claims brought under this provision are reviewed as follows: \u201cWe first ask whether there exists a liberty or property interest of which a person has been deprived, and if so, we ask whether the procedures followed by the State were constitutionally sufficient.\u201d Victory v. Pataki, 814 F.3d 47, 59 (2d Cir. 2016), as amended (Feb. 24, 2016) (citing Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219 (2011)). Mr. Gopal alleges that the Defendants denied him, a union member, of protections under a Collective Bargaining Agreement (\u201cCBA\u201d). Specifically, he cites Articles 27A, 27B, and 32, which call for dismissal only for cause, a hearing before dismissal, and notice and an opportunity to be heard before dismissal, respectively. Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 88\u201393. He argues that he had a property interest in his continued employment, and, by denying him the procedures of the Collective Bargaining agreement, his termination was a violation of his right to due process. Compl. \u00b6 87. Mr. Gopal also alleges a due process claim for a protected liberty interest. See, e g., Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp at 25 (arguing that \u201c[He] pleaded in his complaint the prerequisites for a due 13 process claim: (1) possession . . . of a protected liberty or property interest, and (2) deprivation of that interest . . . .\u201d). Generally, with respect to the due process claims as well as the equal protection claim, Defendants first seek to dismiss under immunity grounds. They argue that the Eleventh Amendment bars claims for monetary damages against them in their official capacities. And they are immune from suit because 42 U.S. Code \u00a7 1983 claims can only be brought against \u201cpersons,\u201d and under the Eleventh Amendment the State, its agencies, and its officials are not considered \u201cpersons.\u201d Def at 10 \u201311. Defendants also move for the dismissal of these claims against because any injunctive and declaratory relief claims are barred as the State of Connecticut has not consented to being sued. More specifically, as to the due process claims, Defendants argue that Mr. Gopal failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and thus, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this claim. In their view, Mr. Gopal should have availed himself of the procedures under \u201cthe collective grievance process as a union member, and the procedures for review and relief by the University\u2019s policies, including an investigation for discriminatory treatment.\u201d Def at 20. As a result, they argue, \u201cSince Plaintiff chose to resign rather than to exercise his rights to this process, he has failed to state a claim for a constitutional violation.\u201d Id. at 22. Defendants also argue that Mr. Gopal\u2019s \u201cstigma plus\u201d due process claim is insufficiently pled. In their view, \u201cthe complaint is devoid of any specific statement made about him, much less ones capable of supporting a stigma-plus claim.\u201d Id. at 23 (citing Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 95\u201398). And \u201cPlaintiff\u2019s resignation does not satisfy the \u2018plus\u2019 requirement because he was never suspended nor terminated \u2013 he suffered no financial loss as a result of the Defendants\u2019 action but chose to resign rather than face the public consequences of his actions.\u201d Id. (emphasis in original). 14 Finally, with respect to these claims as well as the equal protection claim, Defendants argue that qualified immunity precludes liability, even if all of these alleged deficiencies did not. They assert that there was no \u201cclearly established law that doing internal investigations of allegations of wrongdoing which violated state statute and [UCONN] Policies, could be a violation of Plaintiff\u2019s rights or that the Plaintiff\u2019s refusal to utilize the process available to him through the collective bargaining agreement was a violation of his constitutional rights.\u201d Id. at 32. More specifically, as to the application of qualified immunity to Mr. Gopal\u2019s due process claim for a protected property interest, in Defendants\u2019 view, there is no clearly established law that had to provide any additional procedures to Mr. Gopal, after he failed to avail himself of the procedures in the collective bargaining process. See id. at 33-34. (citing Tooly v. Schwaller, 919 F.3d 165, 175 (2d Cir. 2019)). As to the Defendants\u2019 argument about monetary damage claims against any of the Defendants in their official capacities, Mr. Gopal does not contest it. Mr. Gopal claims not to be seeking monetary damages against the Defendants in their official capacities, only injunctive relief. See Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 14 (\u201c[P]laintiff\u2019s claims against the individual defendants, for money damages, is made against them in their \u2018individual capacities.\u2019\u201d). From the individual defendants in their official capacities, Mr. Gopal \u201cseeks the prospective relief of reinstatement with all back pay and benefits and an order prohibiting defendants from \u2018continuing their illegitimate discriminatory and retaliatory practices.\u2019\u201d Id. Mr. Gopal argues that his claim for injunctive relief against these named \u2018state officers\u2019 in their official capacities is well pled. Id. As to the Defendants\u2019 argument that no injunctive or declaratory relief would be appropriate as to UCONN, once again, Mr. Gopal argues that he is not seeking such relief. See id. at 12 (\u201c[I]t is clear that the plaintiff\u2019s claims pursuant to Title against plaintiff\u2019s employer 15 UCONN, and Fourteenth Amendment claims against the named state officials are not barred by sovereign immunity.\u201d). With respect to the failure to exhaust argument, Mr. Gopal does not respond, but states that his procedural due process claim has been well pled.4 See id. at 25 (\u201cPlaintiff has pleaded in his complaint the perquisites for a due process claim: (1) possession by the plaintiff of a protected liberty or property interest, and (2) deprivation of that interest without constitutionally adequate process.\u201d) (citing Tooly, 919 F.3d at 173). As to the stigma-plus claim, Mr. Gopal argues that this claim is also well pled. According to Mr. Gopal, \u201cfalse stigmatizing statements\u201d about him were made \u201cto the public\u201d and \u201cin close proximity to [his] dismissal from his government employment.\u201d Id. at 25. And these factual allegations are sufficient to state a viable claim for relief. See Sadallah v. City of Utica, 383 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 2004). As to the qualified immunity argument, Mr. Gopal argues that \u201cqualified immunity only shields government officials from claims based on statutory and constitutional violations,\u201d Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 26, and \u201cPlaintiff\u2019s other claims are not subject to qualified immunity . . . .,\u201d id. Mr. Gopal never explains which of his claims may or may not survive the doctrine of qualified immunity, although he affirmatively does state \u201cthat defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity.\u201d Id. 4 Given the underlying factual issues involved with this specific exhaustion argument, this issue is better addressed at the summary judgment stage, if at all. Cf. Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 523 (2002) (\u201cOrdinarily, plaintiffs pursuing civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 need not exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in court.\u201d); see also Weyant v. Phia Grp. LLC, No. 19-3117, 2020 5048525, at *1 (2d Cir. Aug. 27, 2020) (reversing summary judgment decision and finding that \u201cthe district court erred in determining that exhaustion was required here because there was no evidence that an administrative appeals process existed for [Plaintiff] to exhaust.\u201d). 16 The Court agrees for now, but, at the very least, the procedural due process claim for a protected property interest ultimately may be dismissed at the summary judgment stage of this case. As a preliminary matter, Defendants\u2019 Eleventh Amendment and sovereign immunity arguments fail for the reasons stated by Mr. Gopal. Defendants have simply misconstrued his claims. As to Mr. Gopal\u2019s procedural due process claim, qualified immunity likely applies to it. Mr. Gopal\u2019s procedural due process argument is premised on the Defendants\u2019 failure to provide him protections provided under the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Compl. \u00b6 53; Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 5. But the scope of Mr. Gopal\u2019s constitutional rights is not determined by the terms of his collective bargaining agreement, or any state-mandated process of law for that matter. See Tooly, 919 F.3d at 172 (\u201cIn determining how much process is adequate, we look to \u2018[f]ederal constitutional standards rather than state statutes [to] define the requirements of procedural due process.\u2019\u201d) (quoting Robinson v. Via, 821 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir. 1987)). And even assuming the Defendants deprived Mr. Gopal of a protected property interest requiring due process, Mr. Gopal cannot prevail unless, under the specific facts of this case, there was clearly established law that this denial violated the Due Process Clause. See id. at 174 (\u201c[T]he question presented is whether there is clearly established federal law holding that the Due Process Clause is violated when the employer has provided the plaintiff with an opportunity to receive the process required . . . but the plaintiff, for possibly proper reasons, has not made use of that process by appearing or responding.\u201d). In Tooly, the Second Circuit held that: \u201cNo case, in this Circuit, or elsewhere, that has been cited to us had held that, where the defendant provides an opportunity for the plaintiff to 17 receive due process at a meeting and the plaintiff, even for potentially valid reasons, fails to appear, the defendant must provide alternative procedures.\u201d Id. at 175. The Second Circuit further noted that: \u201cNor has any case established that the procedures required by [Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985)] may not be provided at that same hearing or that they must be provided in a particular manner not satisfied here.\u201d Id. As a result, Mr. Gopal\u2019s procedural due process claim for a protected property interest is unlikely to survive the application of qualified immunity. Nevertheless, because the Tooly decision came at the summary judgment stage, rather than at the motion to dismiss stage, and a full record regarding the circumstances surrounding Mr. Gopal\u2019s termination \u2013 with admissible evidence rather than only factual allegations \u2013 are not before the Court now, the Court will reserve judgment on the dismissal of this claim until the summary judgment stage, particularly since Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claims will have to be further addressed at that stage of the case as well. See Dietz v. Bouldin, 136 S. Ct. 1885, 1892 (2016) (\u201c[D]istrict courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases.\u201d). As for the stigma-plus claim, a procedural due process claim \u201calleging deprivation of a protected liberty interest,\u201d Waronker v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist., 788 Fed. App'x 788, 793 (2d Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 206 L. Ed. 2d 823 (Apr. 20, 2020) (summary order), this claim too survives the Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss. As both parties recognize, [t]o prevail on such a claim, a plaintiff must plausibly allege \u201c(1) the utterance of a statement sufficiently derogatory to injure his or her reputation, that is capable of being proved false, and that he or she claims is false, and (2) a material state- imposed burden or state-imposed alteration of the plaintiff\u2019s status or rights.\u201d Id. at 794 (quoting Sadallah, 383 F.3d 34 at 38). 18 Mr. Gopal alleges that false statements about him included in the investigation conducted by Mr. Gelston, the compliance officer, relied upon by President Herbst, Provost Murray, and Dean Elliott to get him terminated, see Compl. \u00b6 30 (alleging that \u201c[o]n or about May 22, 2018, Gelston submitted to Herbst, Kennedy, and Elliot his \u2018Final Report,\u2019 which falsely and maliciously stated that plaintiff violated UCONN\u2019s travel policy\u201d). He further alleges that those false statements reiterated in public comments about the ending of Mr. Gopal\u2019s employment with were false and injurious, and helped cause his termination as well as his current difficulties in obtaining future employment. See Compl. \u00b6 59 (quoting from statements allegedly made to the news media, and comments allegedly made by Reitz). At this stage of the case, these factual allegations are sufficient.5 Accordingly, for now, the Court will deem as sufficient Mr. Gopal\u2019s factual allegations with respect to both of his procedural due process claims, the one for an alleged deprivation of a protected property interest, and the other for the alleged deprivation of a protected liberty interest, and deny Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss these two claims. C. The Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Claim public employee may allege discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and \u201cbring suit pursuant to \u00a7 1983.\u201d Naumovski v. Norris, 934 F.3d 200, 212 (2d Cir. 2019). \u201cSuch \u00a7 1983 discrimination claims parallel Title discrimination claims in many respects.\u201d Id. \u201cThe basic elements of such claims, whether pursued under Title or \u00a7 1983, are similar . . . .\u201d Id. And to prove a disparate treatment claim, there must be plausible allegations 5 Significantly, while Defendants cite to the Second Circuit\u2019s summary opinion in Waronker as a basis for dismissal here. That case involved something far less than the termination of one\u2019s employment. See Waronker, 788 F.App\u2019x at 794 (\u201cWaronker\u2019s placement on administrative leave does not satisfy the \u2018plus\u2019 requirement because, as noted above, nothing in the complaint suggests that he suffered a financial loss as a result of his suspensions.\u201d). Here, while Defendants argue that Mr. Gopal has not suffered financially, Mr. Gopal has adequately alleged that \u201c[t]he negative media coverage resulted in plaintiff\u2019s inability to readily obtain comparable employment in his field.\u201d Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 7 (citing to Compl. \u00b6 61). 19 that any \u201cadverse employment action\u201d occurred on account of one\u2019s race. See id. (using the words related to sex discrimination rather than race discrimination). But for a \u00a7 1983 claim, first, there must be allegations that \u201cthe alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law.\u201d Id. Second, rather than just \u201cagainst the employing entity, a \u00a7 1983 claim \u2018can be brought against an[y] individual\u2019 responsible for the discrimination.\u201d Id. Third, the defendant must have \u201cpersonally violated a plaintiff\u2019s constitutional rights . . .\u201d Id. (emphasis in original). Fourth, and finally, \u201ca plaintiff pursuing a claim for employment discrimination under \u00a7 1983 rather than Title must establish that the defendant\u2019s discriminatory intent was a \u2018but-for\u2019 cause of the adverse employment action or the hostile environment.\u201d Id. at 214. In addition to arguments raised with respect to Mr. Gopal\u2019s Title claim, Defendants also argue that to the extent that Mr. Gopal\u2019s equal protection claim is based on selective enforcement, it fails, and that there is a higher level of evidentiary proof for this claim. As a result, in their view, the factual allegations are insufficient. Mr. Gopal argues that he has adequately alleged his equal protection claim. Pl.\u2019s Mem. In Opp. at 9 (citing to the Complaint at \u00b6\u00b6 107-109). The Court agrees. Once again, Defendants rely upon for precedential support a case at the summary judgment stage, not the motion to dismiss stage. Significantly, in that case clarifying how to determine the viability of a \u00a7 1983 equal protection claim for employment discrimination \u2013 in the related context of a sex discrimination claim \u2013 the Second Circuit held that: \u201ca court considering a \u00a7 1983 claim at summary judgment must determine whether, construing the evidence in a light 20 most favorable to the plaintiff, a reasonable jury could find that the adverse employment action would not have occurred but-for sex discrimination.\u201c Naumovski, 934 F.3d at 214. As a result, when this case reaches that stage, the Court will review the viability of Mr. Gopal\u2019s claims based on the availability of admissible evidence rather than the factual allegations of his Complaint or any documentary evidence better presented at that stage of this case.6 Accordingly, the Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss Mr. Gopal\u2019s equal protection claim will be denied For the foregoing reasons, Defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss is at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 25th day of September, 2020. /s/ Victor A. Bolden 6 Although not addressed directly in this ruling elsewhere, the Court also rejects Defendants\u2019 arguments regarding the absence of personal involvement by any or all of the Defendants in the alleged constitutional violations. Defendants rightly cite relevant precedent, such as the Second Circuit\u2019s decades old (and still good law) holding that there must be factual allegations of \u201cpersonal involvement of [the defendants] sufficient their liability for wrongful acts,\u201d not merely their \u201clinkage in the . . . chain of command.\u201d Ayers v. Coughlin, 780 F.2d 205, 210 (2d Cir. 1985); see Def at 34 (citing to and quoting from this case). But nowhere in their written submissions do Defendants deny or otherwise disclaim having been involved in some way in the termination of Mr. Gopal or the subsequent dissemination to the public through the news media of the circumstances surrounding his departure or both. Indeed, as alleged in the Complaint, each of the individual Defendants had some role in these events. See e.g., Compl. \u00b6 23 (\u201cHerbst, Kennedy and Elliot, without any legitimate basis or allegation ordered to investigate plaintiff.\u201d); Id. at \u00b6 25 (\u201cGelston, at the behest of Herbst, Kennedy and Elliot, conducted a racially motivated, overbroad, malicious and intrusive investigation of plaintiff.\u201d); Id. at \u00b6 59 (\u201cDefendants Herbst, Kennedy, Elliot and Reitz published \u2026 false and defamatory statements.\u201d). As a result, to the extent there is an argument for a lack of personal involvement in the alleged violations of Mr. Gopal\u2019s rights, that determination also is better made with admissible evidence rather than on factual allegations or the argument of counsel.", "7700_102.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Gopal v. Univ. of Conn Sep 25, 2020 No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) (D. Conn. Sep. 25, 2020) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Delegate legal research to CoCounsel, your new legal assistant. Try CoCounsel free No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) 09-25-2020 D. GOPAL, Plaintiff, v REITZ, Defendants Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Case details 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 1/20 Ram Gopal (\"Plaintiff\") has sued the University of Connecticut, Susan Herbst, Craig Kennedy, John Elliot, Bruce Gelston, and Stephanie Reitz (collectively, \"Defendants\") for their alleged involvement in his termination under Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution's Due Process Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Defendants have moved to dismiss Mr. Gopal's Complaint. For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion to dismiss is A. Factual Allegations On September 1, 1993, Rom Gopal, an Asian-American male, began working at the University of Connecticut (\"UCONN\"). Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 4, 14 No. 1 (Nov. 15, 2019). Mr. Gopal worked for until the termination of his employment on August 19, 2018. Compl. \u00b6 14. At the time of his termination, Mr. Gopal held the position of Operations Information Management Endowed Professor and Department Head at the University of Connecticut *2 School of Business (\"OPIM\"). Id. at \u00b6 4. 2 Mr. Gopal alleges that, for the entirety of his employment at UCONN, he was a \"conscientious, hard-working and successful employee,\" and that he \"received exemplary performance evaluations\" throughout his tenure. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 15-16. On or about December 15, 2017, however, Susan Herbst, President of UCONN, Craig Kennedy, Provost of UCONN, and John Elliot, Dean of the School of Business, started an investigation against of Mr. Gopal in response to an anonymous complaint about departmental travel policy violations. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 6-8, 17-18. The anonymous complaint allegedly did not identify Mr. Gopal as the person in violation of said policies, but instead stated that the violations were being made by \"a department head at OPIM,\" a position also held by white professors. Id. at \u00b6 26. Bruce Gelston, an associate compliance officer in the University's Office of Compliance, 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 2/20 conducted the investigation, allegedly at the instruction of President Herbst, Provost Kennedy and Dean Elliot. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 9, 23-25. On or about May 22, 2018, Mr. Gelston submitted a Final Report to President Herbst, Provost Kennedy, and Dean Elliot. Id. at \u00b6 30. The Final Report concluded that Mr. Gopal violated UCONN's travel policy. Id. On July 26, 2018 Dean Elliot notified Mr. Gopal of his recommendation that Mr. Gopal be terminated, based on the findings in Mr. Gelston's Report. Id. at \u00b6 41. On August 29, 2018, Mr. Gopal met with the Defendants and they allegedly told him, he would be fired, if he did not resign. Id. at \u00b6 42. Mr. Gopal allegedly became eligible for a full pension on September 1, 2018, but allegedly had to resign two days before that date. Id. at \u00b6\u00b6 44, 46-48. Mr. Gopal alleges that he later learned that his resignation had been characterized *3 publicly as \"not in good standing.\" Id. at \u00b6 48. Mr. Gopal also alleges that all of the findings of the University regarding him were allegedly made public in the Hartford Courant on September 11, 2018, Fox61 News on September 11, 2018, and the Journal Inquirer on September 20, 2018. Id. at \u00b6 59. 3 Mr. Gopal alleges that the investigation conducted by the Defendants was \"racially motivated, overbroad, malicious, and intrusive.\" Id. at \u00b6 25. He further alleges that the investigation was completed with the \"purpose[ful] exclu[sion] of evidence and witnesses.\" Id. at \u00b6 28. Mr. Gopal alleges that travel and overtime procedures enforced against him were ignored by non- minority employees, id. at \u00b6 34 and \"non-minority employees\" with similar procedure violations \"were not investigated or disciplined.\" Id. at \u00b6 36. In his Complaint, Mr. Gopal accuses all defendants of being aware that the School of Business had \"inept procedures that we not uniformly enforced.\" Id. at \u00b6 35. Mr. Gopal argues that he \"was treated differently than other employees based upon his race. . . color, national origin, and ancestry.\" Id. at \u00b6 51. B. Procedural History 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 3/20 On October 2, 2019, Mr. Gopal received a Release of Jurisdiction letter from from the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. Id. at \u00b6 81. On November 4, 2019, he received a Right to Sue letter from the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Id. at \u00b6 82. On November 5, 2019, Mr. Gopal filed his Complaint No. 1. On February 5, 2020 Mr. Gopal and Defendants filed a report on their Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting No.17 (Feb. 5, 2020). Two days later, on February 7, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal *4 Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6). Mot. to Dismiss No. 19 (Feb. 7, 2020), redacted to 41 (May 6, 2020) (\"Def. MTD\"). 4 On March 20, 2020, Mr. Gopal filed an opposition memorandum in response to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Mem. In Opp'n No. 33 (Mar. 20, 2020) (\"Pl.'s Mem. In Opp'n.\"). On May 11, 2020, Defendants filed their reply to Mr. Gopal's opposition memorandum. Reply to Resp. to Mot. to Dismiss No. 44 (May 11, 2020) (\"Def. Reply\"). On May 15, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Supplemental Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 49 (May 15, 2020). On May 20, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Supplemental Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 51 (May 20, 2020). On June 12, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Supplemental Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Suppl. Authority No. 52 (Jun. 12, 2020). On July 7, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Additional Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Additional Authority No. 53 (Jul. 7, 2020). 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 4/20 On August 11, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Controlling Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 60 (Aug. 11, 2020). On August 14, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Controlling Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 63 (Aug. 14, 2020). On August 17, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Controlling Authority\" to support their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 65 (Aug. 17, 2020). On September 9, 2020, Defendants filed a \"Notice of Controlling Authority\" to support *5 of their motion to dismiss. Notice of Controlling Authority No. 69 (Sept. 9, 2020). 5 1 1 Although Defendants have filed several supplemental authorities and have described some of them as \"controlling,\" to the extent they involve summary orders, they are not. While instructive, summary orders are not binding precedent. See Jackler v. Byrne, 658 F.3d 225, 244 (2d Cir. 2011) (\"Under this Court's Rules, and as stated in the heading of our summary orders deciding appeals EFFECT.'\") (referencing 2d Cir. R. 32.1.1(a)) (emphasis in original). On September 15, 2020, the Court held oral argument on the Defendant's motion to dismiss. Min. Entry No. 70 (Sept. 15, 2020 In evaluating a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the court \"must accept as true all material factual allegations in the complaint[,]\" but need not draw inferences favorable to the party asserting jurisdiction. Shipping Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Drakos, 140 F.3d 129, 131 (2d Cir. 1998). The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that subject matter jurisdiction is proper based on facts existing at the time he or she filed the complaint. Scelsa v. City Univ. of N.Y., 76 F.3d 37, 40 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal citations omitted).2 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 5/20 2 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), a party may file a motion to dismiss due to \"insufficient service of process.\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5). Although referred to in Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Defendants have failed to provide an argument as to why Rule 12(b)(5) is applicable here. As a result, the Court will not address this argument complaint must contain a \"short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Any claim that fails \"to state a claim upon which relief can be granted\" will be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In reviewing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), a court applies a \"plausibility standard\" guided by \"two working principles.\" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). First, \"[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.\" Id.; see also Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, *6 555 (2007) (\"While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations . . . a plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds' of his 'entitle[ment] to relief' requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.\" (internal citations omitted)). Second, \"only a complaint that states a plausible claim for relief survives a motion to dismiss.\" Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679. Thus, the complaint must contain \"factual amplification . . . to render a claim plausible.\" Arista Records v. Doe 3, 604 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Turkmen v. Ashcroft, 589 F.3d 542, 546 (2d Cir. 2009)). 6 When reviewing a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the court takes all factual allegations in the complaint as true. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. The court also views the allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and draws all inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Cohen v. S.A.C. Trading Corp., 711 F.3d 353, 359 (2d Cir. 2013); see also York v. Ass'n of the Bar of the City of N.Y., 286 F.3d 122, 125 (2d Cir. 2002) (\"On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accepting the complaint's allegations as true court considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) generally limits its review \"to the facts as asserted within the four corners of the complaint, the documents attached to the complaint as exhibits, and any documents 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 6/20 incorporated in the complaint by reference.\" McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 482 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2007 court may also consider \"matters of which judicial notice may be taken\" and \"documents either in plaintiffs' possession or of which plaintiffs had knowledge and relied on in bringing suit.\" Brass v. Am. Film Techs., Inc., 987 F.2d 142, 150 (2d Cir. 1993); Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc., 359 F. Supp. 2d 140, 144 (D. Conn. 2005). *7 7 The Defendants have moved to dismiss all three of Mr. Gopal's claims, the Title claim, the Due Process Claim, and the Equal Protection Clause claim, under several theories. The Court will address each of these claims in turn.3 3 If information and exhibits outside the scope of Mr. Gopal's Complaint are considered, this Court must treat this motion as a motion for summary judgment. See Hernandez v. Coffey, 582 F.3d 303, 307 (2d Cir. 2009) (\"Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, 'If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56.'\"); see also Mayo v. Fed. Gov't, 558 F. App'x 55, 56 (2d Cir. 2014) (\"[A] court may convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment by considering extrinsic evidence. . .\"). Defendants, however, have requested that their filings be reviewed consistent with the motion to dismiss standard. As a result, the Court will proceed accordingly. A. The Title Claim In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), the Supreme Court established a burden-shifting framework to evaluate claims of employment discrimination and outlined the elements of a prima facie case. Consistent with this decision, in the Second Circuit, a plaintiff must show: (1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was qualified for his position; (3) he suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) there is \"at least minimal support for the proposition that the employer was motivated by discriminatory intent.\" Littlejohn v. City of N.Y., 795 F.3d 297, 311 (2d Cir. 2015 plaintiff's burden for establishing a prima facie case is de minimis. 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 7/20 Woodman v. WWOR-TV, Inc., 411 F.3d 69, 76 (2d Cir. 2005) (\"We have characterized plaintiff's prima facie burden as 'minimal' and 'de minimis.'\") (citing Zimmermann v. Assocs. First Capital Corp., 251 F.3d 376, 381 (2d Cir. 2001)). In the initial pleading stage of litigation for a Title employment discrimination claim, \"allegation of facts supporting a minimal plausible inference of discriminatory intent suffices...because this entitles the plaintiff to the temporary presumption of McDonnell Douglas until the defendant furnishes its asserted reasons for its action against the plaintiff.\" Doe *8 v. Columbia Univ., 831 F.3d 46, 55 (2d Cir. 2016); see also Dawson v. N.Y. City Transit Auth., 624 F. App'x 763, 770 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order) (\"At the pleading stage, district courts would do well to remember th[e] exceedingly low burden that discrimination plaintiffs face....\"). The allegations need not, however, give \"plausible support to the ultimate question of whether the adverse employment action was attributable to discrimination.\" Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. 8 Defendants seek to dismiss Mr. Gopal's Title claim for several reasons. First, they argue that any such claims against the individual defendants should be dismissed because a Title claim may only be brought against his employer, UCONN. Def at 10. Second, they argue that the Title disparate treatment claims against fail because Mr. Gopal fails to plead even a minimal claim of racial discrimination. See id. at 14. In their view, by not providing specific examples of similarly situated employees being treated differently, Mr. Gopal has failed to show the minimal evidence required to move forward with his Title claim. Id. Defendants also argue that Mr. Gopal has no viable Title claim based on a hostile work environment. Id. at 14-16. Finally, Defendants argue that any Title claim suggesting a \"a pattern and practice\" of discrimination must be dismissed because this theory cannot be used in a private, non-class suit. Id. at 17. Mr. Gopal argues that he has sufficiently pled the necessary elements of a Title employment discrimination claim. In his view, he adequately has pled being (1) Asian-American, a member of a protected class; (2) qualified for the position he held; (3) subjected to an adverse employment action; and (4) having had an adverse action occur under circumstances giving rise to an 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 8/20 inference of discrimination. Compl. \u00b6 70. Mr. Gopal also argues having properly alleged that, while he was not the only non-white dean in OPIM, his white colleagues were not *9 subjected to investigations after the received the anonymous letter alleging travel violations. Id. at \u00b6 36. 9 As to the Defendants' argument that a Title claim can only be brought against UCONN, Mr. Gopal does not disagree and denies having brought a Title claim against any of the individual defendants. As Mr. Gopal points out, \"There is not Title claim in the complaint against any individual defendant. The Complaint is clear [sic] actions and termination of plaintiff violated Title VII.\" Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 11 (citing Compl. \u00b6 80). As to the Defendants' argument about Mr. Gopal's alleged Title pattern and practice claim, again, Mr. Gopal denies having brought a separate and distinct pattern and practice claim, and instead makes an allegation of a broader practice of discrimination only as a means of supporting his disparate treatment claim. See Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 20-21 (\"The plaintiff is not seeking to prove his claims via a Teamsters's method of proof. But the facts concerning defendants' practices are highly relevant.\"). Finally, as to Defendants' arguments about the insufficiency of his hostile environment claim, Mr. Gopal argues that his Complaint's allegations are sufficient. The Court agrees. First, the factual allegations in Mr. Gopal's Complaint are sufficient to state a claim for disparate treatment at this stage of the case. As the Second Circuit has noted, \"absent direct evidence of discrimination, what must be plausibly supported by facts alleged in the complaint is that the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, was qualified, suffered an adverse employment action, and has at least minimal support for the proposition that the employer was motivated by discriminatory intent.\" Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. Mr. Gopal's Complaint satisfies this standard. See Compl. \u00b6 4 (Plaintiff is an \"Asian-American male\"); Id. at \u00b6 16 (alleging \"Plaintiff received *10 exemplary performance evaluations during his entire tenure); Id. at \u00b6 56 (alleging \"Plaintiff was subject to harassment, and false administrative charges by defendants, who . . . maintained them to harm plaintiff's 10 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 9/20 employment and career\"); Id. at \u00b6 36 (alleging \"non-minority employees had similar . . . violations and were not investigated or disciplined.\"). At this stage of the case, he is not required to \"give plausible support to the ultimate question of whether the adverse employment action was attributable to discrimination.\" Littlejohn, 795 F.3d at 311. Defendants' second and third arguments for dismissing Mr. Gopal's Title claim, that the claim is brought against individual defendants, and is a pattern and practice claim, also fail. As Mr. Gopal has rightly noted, the Title claim is only against UCONN. See Compl. \u00b6 80 [sic] actions and termination of plaintiff violated Title VII\"). Defendants rightly note that a pattern and practice theory cannot be used in a private, non-class suit. See Chin v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 685 F.3d 135, 149 (2d Cir. 2012) (\"Permitting private plaintiffs to sue the pattern-or-practice method of proof outside the class action context would require us to extend this method beyond its current application. This we decline to do.\"). But, as Mr. Gopal also rightly points out, although \"the pattern-or-practice method of proof,\" (a \"unique form of liability available in government actions,\" see id. at 147) is not available to prove his claim, \"proof that employer engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination may be of substantial help in demonstrating an employer's liability in the individual case.\" Id. at 149. As the Second Circuit in Chin made clear, a Title private plaintiff's proposed use of this alleged evidence \"cannot relieve the plaintiff of the need to establish each element of his or her claim,\" id., a critical distinction between Mr. Gopal's ordinary Title disparate treatment claim and the authority extended under Title to claims brought by the United States government. *11 11 Finally, Defendants' final argument for dismissing Mr. Gopal's Title claim, the failure to plead a viable hostile work environment claim, suffers from the same flaw as their argument to dismiss the Title disparate treatment claim: the imposition of an evidentiary standard more appropriate for the summary judgment stage than now. To state a claim for a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, a plaintiff must plead facts alleging that the complained of conduct: (1) \"is objectively severe or pervasive\u2014that is, . . . creates an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive;\" (2) \"creates an 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 10/20 environment that the plaintiff subjectively perceives as hostile or abusive;\" and (3) \"creates such an environment because of the plaintiff's [status in a protected class].\" Patane v. Clark, 508 F.3d 106, 113 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Gregory v. Daly, 243 F.3d 687, 691-92 (2d Cir. 2001)). Mr. Gopal has alleged an \"objectively severe or pervasive . . . environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive.\" He alleges that, \"without any legitimate basis or allegation officials subjected him to \"a racially motivated, overbroad, malicious and intrusive investigation.\" Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 23, 25; see also Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 18. In his view, \"Defendants' hostile conduct occurred over a period of months culminating in a manipulative, oppressive and deceptive ouster.\" Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 18. And \"created an []abusive workplace based upon Plaintiff's race.\" Id. Ultimately, these allegations may not be supported by admissible evidence, but, at this time, they are sufficient to deny Defendants' motion to dismiss. See Moll v. Telesector Res. Grp., Inc., 760 F.3d 198, 203 (2d Cir. 2014) (vacating and remanding decision granting motion to dismiss because \"the district court erred when it failed to consider all allegations in the Complaint in their totality, including those that were not sexually offensive in nature.\"). \"To *12 decide whether the threshold has been reached, courts examine the case-specific circumstances in their totality and evaluate the severity, frequency, and degree of the abuse.\" Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Because this Court must and has \"considered all incidents in their totality,\" id., the Court determines that Mr. Gopal adequately stated a hostile work environment claim. 12 Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss Mr. Gopal's Title claim will be denied. B. The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Claim \"The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects persons against deprivations of life, liberty, or property; and those who seek to invoke its procedural protection must establish that one of these interests is at stake.\" Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 221 (2005). Claims brought under this provision are reviewed as follows: \"We first ask whether there exists a 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 11/20 liberty or property interest of which a person has been deprived, and if so, we ask whether the procedures followed by the State were constitutionally sufficient.\" Victory v. Pataki, 814 F.3d 47, 59 (2d Cir. 2016), as amended (Feb. 24, 2016) (citing Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219 (2011)). Mr. Gopal alleges that the Defendants denied him, a union member, of protections under a Collective Bargaining Agreement (\"CBA\"). Specifically, he cites Articles 27A, 27B, and 32, which call for dismissal only for cause, a hearing before dismissal, and notice and an opportunity to be heard before dismissal, respectively. Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 88-93. He argues that he had a property interest in his continued employment, and, by denying him the procedures of the Collective Bargaining agreement, his termination was a violation of his right to due process. Compl. \u00b6 87. Mr. Gopal also alleges a due process claim for a protected liberty interest. See, e g., Pl.'s Mem. In Opp at 25 (arguing that \"[He] pleaded in his complaint the prerequisites for a due *13 process claim: (1) possession . . . of a protected liberty or property interest, and (2) deprivation of that interest . . . .\"). 13 Generally, with respect to the due process claims as well as the equal protection claim, Defendants first seek to dismiss under immunity grounds. They argue that the Eleventh Amendment bars claims for monetary damages against them in their official capacities. And they are immune from suit because 42 U.S. Code \u00a7 1983 claims can only be brought against \"persons,\" and under the Eleventh Amendment the State, its agencies, and its officials are not considered \"persons.\" Def at 10 -11. Defendants also move for the dismissal of these claims against because any injunctive and declaratory relief claims are barred as the State of Connecticut has not consented to being sued. More specifically, as to the due process claims, Defendants argue that Mr. Gopal failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and thus, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this claim. In their view, Mr. Gopal should have availed himself of the procedures under \"the collective grievance process as a union member, and the procedures for review and relief by the University's policies, including an investigation for discriminatory treatment.\" Def at 20. As a result, they argue, \"Since 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 12/20 Plaintiff chose to resign rather than to exercise his rights to this process, he has failed to state a claim for a constitutional violation.\" Id. at 22. Defendants also argue that Mr. Gopal's \"stigma plus\" due process claim is insufficiently pled. In their view, \"the complaint is devoid of any specific statement made about him, much less ones capable of supporting a stigma- plus claim.\" Id. at 23 (citing Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 95-98). And \"Plaintiff's resignation does not satisfy the 'plus' requirement because he was never suspended nor terminated - he suffered no financial loss as a result of the Defendants' action but chose to resign rather than face the public consequences of his actions.\" Id. (emphasis in original). *14 14 Finally, with respect to these claims as well as the equal protection claim, Defendants argue that qualified immunity precludes liability, even if all of these alleged deficiencies did not. They assert that there was no \"clearly established law that doing internal investigations of allegations of wrongdoing which violated state statute and [UCONN] Policies, could be a violation of Plaintiff's rights or that the Plaintiff's refusal to utilize the process available to him through the collective bargaining agreement was a violation of his constitutional rights.\" Id. at 32. More specifically, as to the application of qualified immunity to Mr. Gopal's due process claim for a protected property interest, in Defendants' view, there is no clearly established law that had to provide any additional procedures to Mr. Gopal, after he failed to avail himself of the procedures in the collective bargaining process. See id. at 33-34. (citing Tooly v. Schwaller, 919 F.3d 165, 175 (2d Cir. 2019)). As to the Defendants' argument about monetary damage claims against any of the Defendants in their official capacities, Mr. Gopal does not contest it. Mr. Gopal claims not to be seeking monetary damages against the Defendants in their official capacities, only injunctive relief. See Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 14 (\"[P]laintiff's claims against the individual defendants, for money damages, is made against them in their 'individual capacities.'\"). From the individual defendants in their official capacities, Mr. Gopal \"seeks the prospective relief of reinstatement with all back pay and benefits and an order prohibiting defendants from 'continuing their illegitimate discriminatory and retaliatory practices.'\" Id. Mr. Gopal argues that his claim 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 13/20 for injunctive relief against these named 'state officers' in their official capacities is well pled. Id. As to the Defendants' argument that no injunctive or declaratory relief would be appropriate as to UCONN, once again, Mr. Gopal argues that he is not seeking such relief. See id. at 12 (\"[I]t is clear that the plaintiff's claims pursuant to Title against plaintiff's employer *15 UCONN, and Fourteenth Amendment claims against the named state officials are not barred by sovereign immunity.\"). 15 With respect to the failure to exhaust argument, Mr. Gopal does not respond, but states that his procedural due process claim has been well pled. See id. at 25 (\"Plaintiff has pleaded in his complaint the perquisites for a due process claim: (1) possession by the plaintiff of a protected liberty or property interest, and (2) deprivation of that interest without constitutionally adequate process.\") (citing Tooly, 919 F.3d at 173). 4 4 Given the underlying factual issues involved with this specific exhaustion argument, this issue is better addressed at the summary judgment stage, if at all. Cf. Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 523 (2002) (\"Ordinarily, plaintiffs pursuing civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 need not exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in court.\"); see also Weyant v. Phia Grp. LLC, No. 19-3117, 2020 5048525, at *1 (2d Cir. Aug. 27, 2020) (reversing summary judgment decision and finding that \"the district court erred in determining that exhaustion was required here because there was no evidence that an administrative appeals process existed for [Plaintiff] to exhaust.\"). As to the stigma-plus claim, Mr. Gopal argues that this claim is also well pled. According to Mr. Gopal, \"false stigmatizing statements\" about him were made \"to the public\" and \"in close proximity to [his] dismissal from his government employment.\" Id. at 25. And these factual allegations are sufficient to state a viable claim for relief. See Sadallah v. City of Utica, 383 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 2004). As to the qualified immunity argument, Mr. Gopal argues that \"qualified immunity only shields government officials from claims based on statutory and constitutional violations,\" Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 26, and \"Plaintiff's other claims are not subject to qualified immunity . . . .,\" id. Mr. Gopal never 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 14/20 explains which of his claims may or may not survive the doctrine of qualified immunity, although he affirmatively does state \"that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity.\" Id. *16 16 The Court agrees for now, but, at the very least, the procedural due process claim for a protected property interest ultimately may be dismissed at the summary judgment stage of this case. As a preliminary matter, Defendants' Eleventh Amendment and sovereign immunity arguments fail for the reasons stated by Mr. Gopal. Defendants have simply misconstrued his claims. As to Mr. Gopal's procedural due process claim, qualified immunity likely applies to it. Mr. Gopal's procedural due process argument is premised on the Defendants' failure to provide him protections provided under the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Compl. \u00b6 53; Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 5. But the scope of Mr. Gopal's constitutional rights is not determined by the terms of his collective bargaining agreement, or any state-mandated process of law for that matter. See Tooly, 919 F.3d at 172 (\"In determining how much process is adequate, we look to '[f]ederal constitutional standards rather than state statutes [to] define the requirements of procedural due process.'\") (quoting Robinson v. Via, 821 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir. 1987)). And even assuming the Defendants deprived Mr. Gopal of a protected property interest requiring due process, Mr. Gopal cannot prevail unless, under the specific facts of this case, there was clearly established law that this denial violated the Due Process Clause. See id. at 174 (\"[T]he question presented is whether there is clearly established federal law holding that the Due Process Clause is violated when the employer has provided the plaintiff with an opportunity to receive the process required . . . but the plaintiff, for possibly proper reasons, has not made use of that process by appearing or responding.\"). In Tooly, the Second Circuit held that: \"No case, in this Circuit, or elsewhere, that has been cited to us had held that, where the defendant provides an opportunity for the plaintiff to *17 receive due process at a meeting and the plaintiff, even for potentially valid reasons, fails to appear, the defendant must provide alternative procedures.\" Id. at 175. The Second Circuit further 17 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 15/20 Id. at 794 (quoting Sadallah, 383 F.3d 34 at 38). *18 noted that: \"Nor has any case established that the procedures required by [Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985)] may not be provided at that same hearing or that they must be provided in a particular manner not satisfied here.\" Id. As a result, Mr. Gopal's procedural due process claim for a protected property interest is unlikely to survive the application of qualified immunity. Nevertheless, because the Tooly decision came at the summary judgment stage, rather than at the motion to dismiss stage, and a full record regarding the circumstances surrounding Mr. Gopal's termination - with admissible evidence rather than only factual allegations - are not before the Court now, the Court will reserve judgment on the dismissal of this claim until the summary judgment stage, particularly since Mr. Gopal's Title claims will have to be further addressed at that stage of the case as well. See Dietz v. Bouldin, 136 S. Ct. 1885, 1892 (2016) (\"[D]istrict courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases.\"). As for the stigma-plus claim, a procedural due process claim \"alleging deprivation of a protected liberty interest,\" Waronker v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist., 788 Fed. App'x 788, 793 (2d Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 206 L. Ed. 2d 823 (Apr. 20, 2020) (summary order), this claim too survives the Defendant's motion to dismiss. As both parties recognize, [t]o prevail on such a claim, a plaintiff must plausibly allege \"(1) the utterance of a statement sufficiently derogatory to injure his or her reputation, that is capable of being proved false, and that he or she claims is false, and (2) a material state-imposed burden or state- imposed alteration of the plaintiff's status or rights.\" 18 Mr. Gopal alleges that false statements about him included in the investigation conducted by Mr. Gelston, the compliance officer, relied upon by President Herbst, Provost Murray, and Dean Elliott to get him terminated, see Compl. \u00b6 30 (alleging that \"[o]n or about May 22, 2018, Gelston submitted to Herbst, Kennedy, and Elliot his 'Final Report,' which falsely and maliciously stated that plaintiff violated UCONN's travel 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 16/20 policy\"). He further alleges that those false statements reiterated in public comments about the ending of Mr. Gopal's employment with were false and injurious, and helped cause his termination as well as his current difficulties in obtaining future employment. See Compl. \u00b6 59 (quoting from statements allegedly made to the news media, and comments allegedly made by Reitz). At this stage of the case, these factual allegations are sufficient.5 5 Significantly, while Defendants cite to the Second Circuit's summary opinion in Waronker as a basis for dismissal here. That case involved something far less than the termination of one's employment. See Waronker, 788 F.App'x at 794 (\"Waronker's placement on administrative leave does not satisfy the 'plus' requirement because, as noted above, nothing in the complaint suggests that he suffered a financial loss as a result of his suspensions.\"). Here, while Defendants argue that Mr. Gopal has not suffered financially, Mr. Gopal has adequately alleged that \"[t]he negative media coverage resulted in plaintiff's inability to readily obtain comparable employment in his field.\" Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 7 (citing to Compl. \u00b6 61). Accordingly, for now, the Court will deem as sufficient Mr. Gopal's factual allegations with respect to both of his procedural due process claims, the one for an alleged deprivation of a protected property interest, and the other for the alleged deprivation of a protected liberty interest, and deny Defendants' motion to dismiss these two claims. C. The Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Claim public employee may allege discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and \"bring suit pursuant to \u00a7 1983.\" Naumovski v. Norris, 934 F.3d 200, 212 (2d Cir. 2019). \"Such \u00a7 1983 discrimination claims parallel Title discrimination claims in many respects.\" Id. \"The basic elements of such claims, whether pursued under Title or \u00a7 1983, are similar . . . .\" Id. And to prove a disparate treatment claim, there must be plausible allegations *19 that any \"adverse employment action\" occurred on account of one's race. See id. (using the words related to sex discrimination rather than race discrimination). 19 But for a \u00a7 1983 claim, first, there must be allegations that \"the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law.\" Id. Second, rather than just \"against the employing entity, a \u00a7 1983 claim 'can be 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 17/20 brought against an[y] individual' responsible for the discrimination.\" Id. Third, the defendant must have \"personally violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights . . .\" Id. (emphasis in original). Fourth, and finally, \"a plaintiff pursuing a claim for employment discrimination under \u00a7 1983 rather than Title must establish that the defendant's discriminatory intent was a 'but-for' cause of the adverse employment action or the hostile environment.\" Id. at 214. In addition to arguments raised with respect to Mr. Gopal's Title claim, Defendants also argue that to the extent that Mr. Gopal's equal protection claim is based on selective enforcement, it fails, and that there is a higher level of evidentiary proof for this claim. As a result, in their view, the factual allegations are insufficient. Mr. Gopal argues that he has adequately alleged his equal protection claim. Pl.'s Mem. In Opp. at 9 (citing to the Complaint at \u00b6\u00b6 107-109). The Court agrees. Once again, Defendants rely upon for precedential support a case at the summary judgment stage, not the motion to dismiss stage. Significantly, in that case clarifying how to determine the viability of a \u00a7 1983 equal protection claim for employment discrimination - in the related context of a sex discrimination claim - the Second Circuit held that: \"a court considering a \u00a7 1983 claim at summary judgment must determine whether, construing the evidence in a light *20 most favorable to the plaintiff, a reasonable jury could find that the adverse employment action would not have occurred but-for sex discrimination.\" Naumovski, 934 F.3d at 214. 20 As a result, when this case reaches that stage, the Court will review the viability of Mr. Gopal's claims based on the availability of admissible evidence rather than the factual allegations of his Complaint or any documentary evidence better presented at that stage of this case.6 6 Although not addressed directly in this ruling elsewhere, the Court also rejects Defendants' arguments regarding the absence of personal involvement by any or all of the Defendants in the alleged constitutional violations. Defendants rightly cite relevant precedent, such as the Second Circuit's decades old (and still good law) holding that there must be factual 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 18/20 allegations of \"personal involvement of [the defendants] sufficient their liability for wrongful acts,\" not merely their \"linkage in the . . . chain of command.\" Ayers v. Coughlin, 780 F.2d 205, 210 (2d Cir. 1985); see Def at 34 (citing to and quoting from this case). But nowhere in their written submissions do Defendants deny or otherwise disclaim having been involved in someway in the termination of Mr. Gopal or the subsequent dissemination to the public through the news media of the circumstances surrounding his departure or both. Indeed, as alleged in the Complaint, each of the individual Defendants had some role in these events. See e.g., Compl. \u00b6 23 (\"Herbst, Kennedy and Elliot, without any legitimate basis or allegation ordered to investigate plaintiff.\"); Id. at \u00b6 25 (\"Gelston, at the behest of Herbst, Kennedy and Elliot, conducted a racially motivated, overbroad, malicious and intrusive investigation of plaintiff.\"); Id. at \u00b6 59 (\"Defendants Herbst, Kennedy, Elliot and Reitz published ... false and defamatory statements.\"). As a result, to the extent there is an argument for a lack of personal involvement in the alleged violations of Mr. Gopal's rights, that determination also is better made with admissible evidence rather than on factual allegations or the argument of counsel. Accordingly, the Defendants' motion to dismiss Mr. Gopal's equal protection claim will be denied For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 25th day of September, 2020. /s/ Victor A. Bolden About us Jobs News 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 19/20 Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:40 Gopal v. Univ. of Conn., No. 3:19-cv-01810 (VAB) | Casetext Search + Citator 20/20"} |
7,648 | Kym Faull | University of California – Los Angeles | [
"7648_101.pdf",
"7648_101.pdf"
] | {"7648_101.pdf": "Kym Faull Faculty member in redacted department Kym Faull sent an email to his colleagues from his university email account; the email allegedly contained offensive and sexually explicit language. Faull also allegedly told a \"joke\" that was sexually discriminatory, discriminatory on the basis of national origin and offensive. Faull told a Title investigator that he had no idea the email would offend anyone and that the joke was in bad taste. He was found to have violated sexual harassment policy on two separate occasions. Campus: Los Angeles Complaint date: None Questions, comments or corrections? Email [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]). Data and code is open-source on GitHub ( Support innovative, independent student journalism. Donate today. ( Copyright \u00a9 2019 The Daily Californian, The Independent Berkeley Student Publishing Co., Inc."} |
7,753 | Jeffrey Nock | University of Iowa | [
"7753_101.pdf",
"7753_102.pdf",
"7753_103.pdf",
"7753_104.pdf",
"7753_105.pdf",
"7753_106.pdf",
"7753_107.pdf",
"7753_108.pdf",
"7753_109.pdf",
"7753_110.pdf"
] | {"7753_101.pdf": "Women say they ran, hid at gym to avoid University of Iowa lecturer Published 3:57 p.m Aug. 27, 2018 Updated 12:12 p.m Aug. 28, 2018 UPDATE: This article has been updated to include a new comment from Nock's lawyer. Holding her handmade neon pink sign, a woman had a message for potential students and their parents passing by the Tippie College of Business building on a tour in July of employs a serial sexual harasser!\" The woman, Liana Reimer, was waging a one-woman protest against Jeffrey Nock, a lecturer at the college who was issued both a criminal trespass warning and harassment warning by University of Iowa Police in April. Police and bystanders accused Nock of taking pictures of women at the Campus Recreation & Wellness Center. He was not charged with a crime, but the warnings carry with them a ban from university recreation centers for six months person who violates a harassment warning or a criminal trespass warning could be charged in court. Nock began teaching at the University of Iowa in 2012 and continues to teach there. Two weeks after being banned from the recreation buildings, Nock was formally offered $20,776 to teach a summer course and lead an accelerator program that helps students launch their own businesses. On May 29, Nock's contract was renewed for another three years, with his salary based on annual reviews. According to university officials, Nock is still employed by UI, but is not currently scheduled to teach courses this fall. Aimee Breaux Press Citizen 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 1/7 The offer sparked Reimer's short stint of protesting on campus. She also quickly came across other gym-goers who accused Nock of inappropriate behavior. Nock did not respond to requests for comment. Nock's lawyer, Leon Spies, has asked that the Press-Citizen refrain from writing about his client's employment status and criticized the Press-Citizen's \"editorial judgment and professional responsibility.\" In a statement sent to the Press-Citizen Tuesday, he said his client cooperated fully with the investigation. \"He steadfastly denies that he has intentionally engaged in any unwelcome behavior, let alone the harassment alleged in the Press-Citizen,\" Spies said. \"Anyone with legitimate complaints about his interactions with others have constructive avenues for voicing those complaints. Social media shaming and picketing should be seen for what they are: thoughtless harassment damaging not just to Mr. Nock and his family but to the entire community as well.\" In a letter previously submitted to the editor of the Press-Citizen, the attorney criticized the publication's reporting. \"Based on a 'heavily redacted' report from the University of Iowa Department of Public Safety of an 'inactive investigation' that resulted in no criminal charges, the Iowa City Press-Citizen has exposed a respected University of Iowa faculty member, Jeffrey Nock, to unjust personal embarrassment, unwelcome publicity, and professional injury,\" Spies said in the letter. Two university investigations witness to the April incident told Reimer about it in early May. Reimer remembered Nock as the man who would frequently tap her on the shoulder at the gym to try to get her attention while she worked out. When the university Office of Equal Opportunity & Diversity opened its own investigation, Reimer told the compliance coordinator that Nock would run on the track, holding his phone out in front of him at an angle that would allow him to take pictures of nearby people, according to a university summary of the interview. 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 2/7 At least three other women were interviewed as part of the investigation, including a 19-year- old freshman Nock reportedly asked out for drinks, claiming that he would be able to help her pursue her research opportunities. Those interviewed were told that the investigation has been closed. University officials declined to state whether there was an investigation and whether it was closed, saying legal restrictions prevented them from doing so. But officials did say that Nock is still employed at and that on Oct. 25, Nock will be allowed back at the recreation center. The initial report Police issued the warning following a complaint from Kelsey Peters, a 22-year-old senior at the time who said she noticed Nock taking photos of other women at the gym. Peters provided the Press-Citizen with a written witness statement she provided to the University of Iowa Police Department. She also sent the Press-Citizen the summary of her interview with a compliance coordinator that the university provided her upon request. In her police statement she describes confronting Nock before she stormed off, head shaking, to tell gym staff. She'd brought it up to the front desk on her way out of the building. Earlier that day, around 11 a.m., she noticed Nock at the leg extension machine. She said she remembered him because he'd worked out on machines next to her before, and she did not like how frequently he would talk to her. \u201cWhen first saw him thought really hope he doesn\u2019t keep working out next to me,'\u201d she said in an interview with the Press-Citizen. In the subsequent police report, she said she saw him point his phone at her as if taking a picture, but since she was unsure if that's what he was doing, she kept exercising. When she moved to the third floor to do a different exercise, she told police, she kept an eye on him. This time she was confident she saw him taking pictures of other women saw him turn to take a picture of a girl on the left of him,\" she wrote in her statement. \"He proceeded to do a shoulder press exercise and then took a picture of a girl on his right as was walking over to the water fountain closer to him.\" Describing herself as \"a bit fired up\" in the police report, Peters said she yanked the headphones out of Nock's ears to confront him. He told her that he was taking Snapchat 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 3/7 selfies, though when two men behind Nock said they too saw him taking photos, Peters said Nock's story changed. Nock said \"OK, I'll stop,\" according to the witness statement. Peters left for the locker rooms. On her way out she reported the incident to the woman at the front desk, who called the police. Some time later, she told her roommate, Madison Pecaitis, who instantly recognized the name Nock. 'Remember the professor who asked me out for drinks?' \"You're kidding me,\" the 19-year-old roommate recalled saying to Peters at the time. \"Remember the professor who asked me out for drinks? That's the same one.\" Pecaitis, a student, was also interviewed by a university compliance officer. She provided the summary of her interview and showed the Press-Citizen text messages on her phone from the number she said Nock used to text her. (The number sent the Press-Citizen to a voicemail for \"Jeff.\") Pecaitis first met Nock in the steam room of the recreation center in April of 2017. He introduced himself and talked about his job at UI. Pecaitis said he said hello a few times after that. The first time she felt uncomfortable came in June that year. According to her interview summary, she said Nock approached her while she was weightlifting and suggested that she consider entering body competitions. She said the remark made her uncomfortable, and she changed the subject by asking about his entrepreneurial work and tips for getting research positions. According to the interview summary, she said Nock told her to email researchers and show an interest in their subject area. He gave her his phone number in case she needed any help, according to the interview summary. They exchanged texts with their names. According to the interview summary, five days later, Nock came up to her in the gym again and offered to help her study if she took any business classes with him. Pecaitis said this is when the conversation pivoted. She told the compliance coordinator that Nock asked her to get drinks with him sometime. Pecaitis said she said \"OK\" at the time out of surprise. She told the Press-Citizen she had established her age and class status with Nock previously. 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 4/7 She ignored two of Nock's texts that evening. When he texted her \"You OK?\" she responded two hours later by saying she wanted to keep their interactions professional. Nock replied that he extended the invitation to her as a professional networking opportunity. \"Did you think was trying to date you???\" he texted five hours later. Then, 40 minutes after not receiving a response, he texted, \"Geez am just a friendly person who likes to help people said no thank you please accept it. Sorry for the confusion,\" she responded. Pecaitis said she didn't text Nock back after that, though her friends did take her phone and as a prank text Nock might be interested,\" to which Nock responded \"did you mean it?\" Pecaitis said she didn't respond back. She told the Press-Citizen that she took issue with the last line in the interview summary, which states that Nock did not interact with her after the text exchange. She provided the Press-Citizen with corrections to the statement she submitted to the compliance coordinator. In the corrections she said she ran into Nock at Micky's Irish Pub during the day in August and he was with a woman about her age. \"He made sure to say hi to me until said hi back,\" she wrote. \"It was a very uncomfortable setting.\" Pecaitis worked in the Power Cafe\u0301 at the front of the recreation center. She told the Press- Citizen she used to retreat to the back room when she saw Nock, though she recalled in a separate occasion in the email to the coordinator that Nock \"made sure he made eye contact with me and said 'Hi Maddi have seen ... him lurking around the platform weightlifting area on the 1st floor of the CRWC,\" she said in the email, \"but have never seen him pick up a weight ever.\" 'But he was persistent fourth woman, a friend of Reimer, told the Press-Citizen that she too had an encounter with Nock. The woman asked that her name not be used. Her husband confirmed that he remembered her telling him about the incident, because she stopped going to the gym in the mornings as a result lecturer banned from rec center after he was accused of taking pictures of women 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 5/7 The woman is not a student, but was interviewed by university officials. She shared with the Press-Citizen the summary from her interview with the compliance coordinator. According to the summary, the woman told the compliance coordinator that she was running on the third floor of the gym sometime in late 2014 or early 2015 when she noticed Nock running beside her, waving his hands to get her attention. \"[She] states that she ignored him at first, but he was persistent,\" the summary states. \"She finally stopped, took her headphones out, glared at Mr. Nock and asked him what he wanted.\" According to the summary, Nock told her that she was doing a good job running and complimented her looks. The woman said that based on his demeanor, he was inappropriately commenting on her body. She said she told him off, using an expletive, then left the track area. The woman said she told the compliance coordinator that she felt afraid when, upon preparing to leave, she saw Nock standing in the bathroom area near the exit of the gym. She said neither of them spoke, but his presence felt threatening, and she said she ran to her car one-woman protest The woman recounted her experience running away from Nock at Big Grove Brewery in Iowa City in late June. Reimer spearheaded the small gathering of mostly women to help brainstorm ways to protest Nock's employment. Fewer than 10 attended the meeting. The majority had never met Nock but were generally skeptical of how handles sexual harassment. They discussed ideas such as handing out fliers at the door of Nock's class or mimicking protesters who camped out in University of Iowa President Bruce Harreld's office earlier in the year week later, though, only Reimer stood outside of the Tippie College of Business, holding the sign she made an hour before. For a few days, Reimer silently positioned herself outside the Tippie building in a way that made it difficult for tour guides to tactfully avoid her. 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 6/7 She said she's outraged that the university will continue to employ Nock, but she was also partially motivated by a sense of guilt. When Reimer learned Nock was bothering other women, her first thought was, \"Maybe he wouldn't have done it if complained about him don't want the university to pass him on to the next institution where he can do this,\" she said want women to be aware.\" Mostly, she said while holding the sign in July, she was keeping in mind current students and her own daughter, who might one day go to UI. After she finished explaining Nock's employment history to a passerby in June, she posed a question. \"What are they going to do if somebody does something like that to them?\" she asked. Ways you can report harassment to Office of the Sexual Misconduct Response Coordinator In person at the office, 450 Van Allen Hall Email [email protected] Call the office phone line, 319-335-6200 Report a problem online at osmrc.uiowa.edu/report-problem-0 Reporter Aimee Breaux covers education for the Press-Citizen. Reach her at [email protected] or 319-887-5414, and follow her on Twitter @aimee_breaux. 2/22/25, 10:41 More women say they were harassed by lecturer banned from gym 7/7", "7753_102.pdf": "7 Download Our Apps Sign Up For Email Alerts Deals Contests Ask The Expert 3e910633d7c3.html of fires professor accused of harassment By adwpadmin Sep 18, 2018 University of Iowa professor has been fired months after he was forbidden to go into any university recreation buildings, following an accusation of harassment. Hayley Bruce, a spokesperson with the university, confirmed Tuesday that Jeff Nock was no longer an employee and that he had been terminated for violating the school\u2019s sexual harassment policy. Nock was a lecturer in the Henry B. Tippie College of Business. 2/22/25, 10:41 of fires professor accused of harassment | News | kwwl.com 1/3 Tags University Of Iowa University Jeff Nock Law Work Professor Hayley Bruce Recreation Policy On April 25, 2018, Nock was serving a criminal trespass warning for all of the recreation buildings, which barred him from the facilities for six months. Nock had been accused of taking pictures of women while they were working out. Despite the termination coming five months after the accusation, Bruce said in a statement, \"the University of Iowa does not condone sexual misconduct of any kind, and takes all allegations seriously. The university has programs to prevent sexual misconduct, processes for investigating and handling reports of harassment, and policies to hold offenders accountable. These processes take time, but the university can and does take interim steps to ensure the safety of our campus community.\" Bruce went on to say the university is pleased in the campus communities ability to report \"unwanted contact\" to officials and law enforcement. \"So, we can ensure prohibited behavior is addressed through the appropriate university policies and/or criminal statutes. We are limited in the actions we can take in response to reports to the media or online and encourage anyone who has received harassing messages or unwanted contact report it to university officials and/or law enforcement,\" she wrote. In wake of the allegations made against Nock, a Facebook page entitled, \"Speak Out Against the University of Iowa and Jeffrey B. Nock\", was created to demand Nock be fired. Following the news of his termination the page thanked the community for helping. \"What began as a demand for protection became the exposure of a predator and the flawed policy that allows for it. None of this would have happened, had the University put immediate measures in place to protect its students would have assumed justice would play out and we would all be safe. By waiting four months to enact \u201cInterim Measures\u201d the University of Iowa perpetuated rape culture, whether they realize it or not,\" the post read. 2/22/25, 10:41 of fires professor accused of harassment | News | kwwl.com 2/3 2/22/25, 10:41 of fires professor accused of harassment | News | kwwl.com 3/3", "7753_103.pdf": "University of Iowa fires lecturer warned of harassment - The University of Iowa has fired a lecturer who was not teaching this semester, though still earning $83,100, after a police warning for trespassing and harassment at the campus recreation center last spring became the subject of public protests and social media shaming this summer. Jeffrey B. Nock's last day was Sept. 11 officials confirmed. The 54-year-old lecturer in the Henry B. Tippie College of Business was terminated for violating the sexual harassment policy, officials said. But citing privacy concerns, the university would not provide The Gazette with a copy of the termination letter. In a statement Nock's attorney, Leon Spies, said his client 'intends to exercise every effort to right the wrongs inflicted by the university in terminating his employment.\u201d Weeks after Nock was banned for six months from the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center for taking pictures of women working out, the on May 29 extended his existing three-year contract for another three years, from August until May 2021. That was supposed to start with a fall entrepreneurship course, Managing the Growth Business, and was to follow Nock's $20,776 summer addendum the offered him May 10 to teach an entrepreneurship course and lead the summer accelerator program. Before the amended and then extend Nock's contract, its police department had on April 25 issued him a warning for criminal trespass and harassment - reports that did not result in criminal charges, but did lead to the six-month ban. The incident, along with the UI's continued employment of Nock, sparked protests over the summer - which started small, with only one woman at times. The campaign manifest on social media, with a Facebook page entitled, 'Speak out Against the University of Iowa and Jeffrey B. Nock.\u201d And notices and leaflets picturing him appeared around town demanding the university MAN!\u201d Nock did fulfill his summer duties, but was pulled from classroom duties this fall. David Hensley, his supervisor and executive director of the John Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center, is teaching the course instead, according to the online course catalog Officials earlier confirmed the reassignment but did not explain a reason for the swap spokeswoman Hayley Bruce previously said the university police investigation into the April incident at the rec center was 'inactive\u201d although any violation of the facility ban could revive it. On the protesters' Facebook page this month, an administrator of the page posted what appears to be a confidential document explaining the finding that Nock violated policy. 'The act of taking pictures of the women in this context is objectively unreasonable,\u201d according to the document, which goes on to say the effect was to 'create an environment that is hostile to women.\u201d Vanessa Miller Sep. 17, 2018 6:09 pm, Updated: Sep. 17, 2018 6:43 pm Why you can trust The Gazette Jeffrey Nock. (2018 photo from website.) 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa fires lecturer warned of harassment | The Gazette 1/2 Commentary associated with that post rips the for taking months to act on the finding. l Comments: (319) 339-3158; [email protected] 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa fires lecturer warned of harassment | The Gazette 2/2", "7753_104.pdf": "The Daily Iowan \u2022 September 13, 2018 \u2022 university-of-iowa-following-sexual-harassment-allegations/ Jeffrey Nock no longer employed by University of Iowa following sexual- harassment allegations Formerly a lecturer in the Tippie College of Business, Jeffrey Nock is no longer employed by the after being issued criminal trespassing and harassment warnings in April for his conduct at the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center. Marissa Payne, Managing Editor Following allegations of sexual harassment in the spring, Jeffrey Nock, a Tippie College of Business lecturer, is \u201cno longer employed by the University of Iowa,\u201d Jeneane Beck, the assistant vice president for External Relations, informed The Daily Iowan on Thursday. Law-enforcement officials and witnesses at the Campus Recreation & Wellness Center reported that Nock had taken photographs of women while they exercised. He was issued criminal trespassing and harassment warnings in April, according to an incident report harassment warning does not carry a legal consequence until it is violated, which can lead to harassment or other criminal charges. Nock began teaching at the as an adjunct lecturer in 2012, and he was named a lecturer in 2014. Nock was also president and of Goodwill of the Heartland from 2008-2012 but resigned because of a personnel issue community members gathered Aug. 30 outside the Pappajohn Business Building to protest Nock\u2019s employment. He was not scheduled to teach classes this fall, though he was still employed at the time. Katie Goodale protester holds their sign during the Jeffery Nock protest outside of the Pappajohn Business Building on Aug. 30, 2018. Students and faculty turned out to protest Professor Jeffery B. Nock, who is still employed at the university despite issued a criminal trespass warning after allegedly taking photographs of women at the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center.", "7753_105.pdf": "lecturer banned from rec center after he was accused of taking pictures of women Published 6:01 p.m June 25, 2018 Updated 7:11 p.m June 25, 2018 University of Iowa faculty member has been barred from recreation buildings on campus for six months after he was accused of taking pictures of women during workouts at UI\u2019s Campus Recreation and Wellness Center. Jeffrey Nock, a lecturer from the John Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center, was issued a criminal trespass warning along with a harassment warning notice April 25, according to a University of Iowa Police incident report 22-year-old woman reported the incident to university police in April, according to the report. Much of the police report is redacted to remove identifying information, but the incident is described as \u201cSuspicious male taking pictures of females working out.\u201d More: Survey: Freshmen students experience more sexual violence The public information officer for the Department of Public Safety said the criminal trespass warning will last for six months after the date it was issued, meaning Nock is barred from all recreation buildings on campus until Oct. 25. The harassment warning doesn't carry additional consequences, though a person who violates a harassment warning could be charged with harassment. The police investigation on the incident is inactive, said Hayley Bruce, media relations manager for UI's Office of Strategic Communication. Bruce declined to comment on whether the university is currently investigating the matter, saying that any such investigation would be a confidential personnel matter. Aimee Breaux Press Citizen 2/22/25, 10:41 Iowa lecturer banned from rec center, accused of taking women's photos 1/3 Nock began teaching at the University of Iowa in 2012 and continues to teach there. Two weeks after being banned from recreation buildings, Nock was formally offered $20,776 to teach a summer course and lead an accelerator program that helps students launch their own businesses. On May 29, Nock's contract was renewed for another three years, with his salary based on annual reviews. Nock did not respond to requests for an interview. His lawyer, Iowa City-based Leon Spies, did reach out to the Press-Citizen, though he decl`ined to comment on his client's situation 22-year-old woman reported the incident to university police in April, according to police documents. Much of the police report is redacted to remove identifying information. MORE: University of Iowa responds after dozens accuse man of sexual harassment News of Nock's alleged actions comes at a time of heightened attention about sexual harassment in society and on campus. Campus climate surveys conducted by the university indicate that a sizable portion of students at experience sexual harassment from faculty members. Of the nearly 2,700 respondents who took the 2015 survey offered by the university, 36 percent said they experienced sexist gender harassment by faculty and staff, 13 percent said they experienced crude gender harassment, 4.2 percent said they experienced unwanted sexual attention, and 1.5 percent said they experienced sexual coercion. Of the nearly 7,000 respondents who took the 2017 survey offered by the university, 43 percent of female students said they had been sexually harassed by a faculty or staff member. Of the male respondents, 31 percent said they had been sexually harassed by a faculty or staff member. MORE: Steve Wynn, namesake of vision institute, accused of sexual harassment Around the time the surveys were issued, the university rolled out plans to improve the climate on campus. In early 2014, university officials crafted the lengthy two-year Six Point Plan to Combat Sexual Assault. In 2016, the Anti-Violence Plan picked up where the 2014 plan ended, this time including a specific strategy to expand faculty and staff sexual harassment prevention efforts. The Anti-Violence Plan made a commitment to \"explaining the importance of creating an environment where sexist and crude gender harassment is not used, even if it does not 2/22/25, 10:41 Iowa lecturer banned from rec center, accused of taking women's photos 2/3 violate university policy.\" It also announced plans to make web-based sexual harassment programs mandatory for more faculty, including employees with teaching appointments below 50 percent. Perhaps one of the most important things people on the receiving end of harassment should know is that harassment is defined by the person being targeted, said Adam Robinson, executive director of the Rape Victim Advocacy Program. This means the indicator of harassment is a student's own \"inner siren,\" Robinson said. \"If something is happening that is making them feel uncomfortable, they have a right to stand up against that and speak up against that \u2014 and ask for help,\" he said. MORE: Guest opinion lived experience of Trump-era homophobia, heterosexism is a sexual assault victim advocacy organization that is a part of but also provides services outside of the community, including in Iowa City, Keokuk, Mount Pleasant and Burlington. Harassment, like sexual violence, is grounded in power dynamics, Robinson said, which means reporting sexual harassment to law enforcement or university officials can be an empowering experience for some. For others, however, it can further feelings of powerlessness. Ways you can report harassment to Office of the Sexual Misconduct Response Coordinator In person at the office, located at 450 Van Allen Hall. Email [email protected] Call the office phone line, 319-335-6200 Report a problem online at osmrc.uiowa.edu/report-problem-0 Reporter Aimee Breaux covers education for the Press-Citizen. Reach her at [email protected] or 319-887-5414, and follow her on Twitter @aimee_breaux. 2/22/25, 10:41 Iowa lecturer banned from rec center, accused of taking women's photos 3/3", "7753_106.pdf": "19\u00b0 Cedar Rapids \uf0c9 Video News Weather \uf002 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy (KWQC) By Chantelle Navarro, KCRG-TV9 Published: Sep. 18, 2018 at 6:20 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 1/6 University of Iowa professor is now out of a job, months after multiple women accused him of sexual harassment. Jeffery Nock was a lecturer in the Tippie School of Business. The University fired him for violating the university's sexual harassment policy woman filed a police report in April, when Nock received a harassment warning and the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center banned him from its buildings. One woman said, in July, he was recording women on the balcony of the rec center when she took a recording of him then. Feeling frustrated that he was still on campus, fliers started circulating, alleging that this lecturer in the business school was a serial harasser. People protested in front of the Tippie College of Business last month, and just last week the University of Iowa fired Jeffrey Nock citing violation of the school's sexual harassment policy. \"Women should be able to be in an environment where we can walk freely without worrying about someone taking our picture, someone harassing us,\" said Liana Reimer. The women told TV-9, at first they didn't speak up, because they didn't think it would stop the harassment decided because it wasn't an overt action because it wasn't sexual assault that was just going to let it pass,\" said Reimer. Reimer organized this rally asking for the termination of Jeff Nock after hearing from dozens of others that he was making women on campus uncomfortable. \"These women have held on to these things because they've been afraid to speak out just for that reason,\" said Reimer. But experts said when people endure harassment it can have a layering effect, trauma on top of trauma, that can have long term mental health impacts have my own personal experiences with Jeff Nock and really regret not coming forth before this incident in April,\" said Reimer. \"There's not just one thing that is sexual violence,\" said Reimer. \"People think of rape as penetrative super physical battery sexual. That's not the only kind that occurs inside of rape culture\" Kerri Truefunk works with the Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault. She said it happens more often than people realize in the employment and educational realms. \uf057 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 2/6 \"Unfortunately things like this happen all too frequently with individuals...autonomy and for people to be treated with fairness and respect a lot of times gets overshadowed,\" said Truefunk. Truefunk said the only way to change it is to change how victims feel about reporting misconduct and how society views this issues. \"It's really examining how we talk about this kind of experience how we frame survivors of this kind of experience,\" said Truefunk, People seeking confidential support can contact: - Rape Victim Advocacy Program at (319) 335-6000 -Women's Resource and Action Center at (319) 335-7294 - Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault (515) 244-7424 Most Read Crossout | Sponsored Villas in Dubai | Search Ads | Sponsored Amusement Park Equipment | search ads | Sponsored Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Check out the new Crossout 2.0 for free. Discover PvP and PvE in our upgraded Action MMO. Countless unique Vehicles, PvE and PvP, Trading. Are you ready? Destroy vehicles your opponent took hours to craft and enjoy. Join now for Free Play Now Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Get Deals Amusement Park Equipment In Mexico Might be Given Away For Almost Nothing! Learn More Laser Cutting Machines | Sponsored Tips and Tricks | Sponsored Luxury Sofa | Search ads | Sponsored Top 10 Best Laser Cutting Machines 2024 (See Prices) Search Now Never Throw Away the Water After Boiling Eggs - The Reason is Genius! Wish we had known this before Pakistan: Unsold Sofas for Every Style And Budget at Affordable Prices \uf144 Deere laying off more workers in Iowa \uf057 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 3/6 11-year-old girl dies by suicide after bullies threatened to call on her family \uf144 Man arrested following standoff in Cedar Rapids allegedly stole a dog from animal shelter \uf144 Traffic back to normal after crash on Highway 30 \uf144 Decorah High School teacher charged with sexual exploitation by a school employee \uf144 Home uninhabitable after late night fire Condemned South Carolina killer chooses to be executed by firing squad \uf144 Police identify suspect arrested in Cedar Rapids standoff \uf057 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 4/6 Latest News Convicted serial rapist pleads guilty in Johnson County case \uf144 Marion Fire Dept. reporting more calls for carbon monoxide amidst freezing temps \uf144 Iowa City\u2019s electric buses struggle to stay charged due to freezing temps \uf144 Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird pauses lawsuit aimed at disability protections \uf144 How Four Oaks works to find the right homes for foster kids \uf144 Man arrested following standoff in Cedar Rapids allegedly stole a dog from animal shelter \uf144 Care tips for houseplants during the cold winter months \uf057 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 5/6 \uf144 Decorah High School teacher charged with sexual exploitation by a school employee \uf144 \uf057 Public Inspection File Applications [email protected] - (319) 399-5999 Closed Captioning/Audio Description Terms of Service Privacy Policy Statement Advertising Digital Marketing Boxing Customize At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 News First Alert Weather Sports Contact Us YouNews Pinpoint Doppler Radar 9.2 Submit a News Story Show You Care Cancellations Athlete Of The Week Advertise With Us Listings 501 2nd Ave Cedar Rapids 52401 (319) 399-5999 2/22/25, 10:41 University of Iowa lecturer fired after violating sexual harassment policy 6/6", "7753_107.pdf": "Before he came to UI, fired lecturer was accused of sexual assault Published 5:20 p.m Sept. 21, 2018 Note: The Press-Citizen does not publish the names of victims of sexual assault without their permission. Years before University of Iowa police cited recently fired lecturer Jeffrey Nock for taking pictures of women at the gym, Iowa City police were notified that he allegedly assaulted a woman. Under a pseudonym in 2010, Nock would frequently come by the shop the woman operated in Iowa City to make small talk and flirt, according to witness testimony documented in a police incident report. Sometime in April of that year, however, Nock walked into the back room of the shop, refusing to leave \"without a kiss,\" according to the account. READ: University of Iowa fires lecturer for taking unwanted pictures of women at campus gym When the shop operator left her post to ask him to leave, she told police, he knocked her to her knees and forced his erect penis into her mouth. According to the report, after relating the story, the woman became too upset to continue going into more detail. Nock \"vigorously disputes\" the police report, according to his lawyer, Leon Spies. The Iowa City attorney sent the Press-Citizen the following written statement on behalf of his client: \"Mr. Nock vigorously disputes this anonymous claim of sexual impropriety made years ago, as he does the other accusations of harassment that have found their way into the press and social media. In choosing to give life to these accusations the Aimee Breaux Press Citizen 2/22/25, 10:42 Jeffrey Nock: Former lecturer accused of sexual assault 1/2 Press-Citizen once again betrays its responsibility to the community, and its duty of fairness and journalistic integrity.\u201d Law enforcement were notified of the alleged assault by a maintenance worker who received a note about Nock sexually assaulting her in 2010. The woman handed him the note shortly after Nock made contact with her again in 2013. According to the report, the woman opted not to file charges, telling officers that she was worried about ruining Nock's life. She did, however, agree to have police officers verbally warn Nock for harassment. Nock worked at the university from 2012 to Sept. 11, 2018. The termination came after police temporarily banned Nock from campus recreation centers in April. 2/22/25, 10:42 Jeffrey Nock: Former lecturer accused of sexual assault 2/2", "7753_108.pdf": "University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 Multiple women allege lecturer has been caught taking photos of female students working out at gym. Published Aug. 28 2018 12:41AM 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 1/5 The University of Iowa has been accused of continuing to employ a lecturer despite his having been banned from part of the campus for allegedly sexually harassing female students. The lecturer, identified by the Iowa City Press-Citizen as Jeffrey Nock, was reportedly issued a criminal trespass warning and a harassment warning from the University of Iowa Police in April. He was also the subject of two university investigations that were launched after multiple people complained about him taking photos of women as they worked out in the college\u2019s recreation center, according to the report. The investigations, which relied on interviews with numerous women who\u2019d complained about Nock, appear to not yet have resulted in any action, as the university confirmed to the Press-Citizen that Nock is still employed there. Two weeks after he was banned from the recreation center due to complaints, he was reportedly offered more than $20,000 to teach additional courses. Nock\u2019s presence at the university has reportedly prompted at least one woman to Facebook/University of Iowa 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 2/5 protest on campus, and several fliers have been posted calling on the university to fire the \u201cserial sexual harasser.\u201d Read it at Iowa City Press-Citizen Can\u2019t get enough of the Beast? Unlock unrestricted access to our reporting with a paid subscription. Subscribe Now Trending Now Trump Makes Hat- Wearing \u2018Killer\u2019 Chairman of Joint Chiefs William Vaillancourt Donald Trump Shades Musk: \u2018What the F*** Is Wrong With Him?\u2019 David Gardner Whistleblower Chelsea Manning Makes Surprise Show of Support at Luigi MangioneHearing Dolly Parton Calls Out Indiana Gov Over Plan to Dump Her Imagination Library Nandika Chatterjee Former Intelligence Officer Claims Recruited Trump Isabel van Brugen 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 3/5 Liam Archacki Online Jobs in from Pakistan (Salaries Will Surprise You) Search Ads Best Universities For An Degree In The Degrees | Search Ads [Pics] World\u2019s First Surviving Septuplets \u2013 Look At Them 20 Years Later Journalistate 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 4/5 \u00a9 2025 The Daily Beast Company 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Accused of Employing \u2018Serial Sexual Harasser\u2019 5/5", "7753_109.pdf": "The Daily Iowan \u2022 February 26, 2019 \u2022 and-assault-in-college-is-crucial/ Newby: Confronting sexual harassment and assault in college is crucial Sexual harassment and assault spans across countless workplace industries \u2013 but confronting the problem should begin before people step into the workplace. Taylor Newby, Opinions Columnist The conversation about sexual harassment and assault has transcended global headlines, national initiatives, and the diligence of local advocacy groups \u2014 reverberating across all platforms the message of an incomparable need for immediate change. And it begins with college campuses. Allegations of sexual misconduct have hit countless industries \u2014 crowding timelines and news outlets with incomparable stories shared openly and honestly. But these stories do not stop there. Allegations are not limited to the industries that are widely covered by the spotlight, such as testimonies of harassment and assault that have broadly found a home in Hollywood or facets of the media. Instead, the allegations often expand across more unnoticed areas of society, in service jobs, retail trade, and even lecture halls. And so, rather than settling into a routine of only ever busting the bad guy in Hollywood, we need to hold men and women accountable for sexual harassment and assault closer to home \u2014 whether that be our colleagues, our neighbors, or our professors. Just last year, Jeffrey Nock, a lecturer in the Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center was caught taking photos of women working out. At first, he was only suspended from lecturing and banned from the Campus Recreation & Wellness Center for six months. But then, the announced he was no longer employed by the University in September following the sexual-harassment allegations. Even still, it had taken more than four months and a student-led protest via Facebook for the to fire this lecturer in the wake of allegations. RELATED: Jeffrey Nock no longer employed by University of Iowa following sexual-harassment allegations Katie Goodale protester holds their sign during the Jeffery Nock protest outside of the Pappajohn Business Building on Aug. 30, 2018. Students and faculty turned out to protest Professor Jeffery B. Nock, who is still employed at the university despite issued a criminal trespass warning after allegedly taking photographs of women at the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center. According to RAINN, college-age women are four times more likely to experience some form of sexual assault than women who aren\u2019t in school. And college-age men are 78 percent more likely to experience sexual assault than men who aren\u2019t in school. While these numbers are astounding, it\u2019s important to acknowledge the number of men and women who are harassed and assaulted beyond their college years. According to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will be sexually abused before they turn 18. And a 2018 survey done by Stop Street Harassment, a nonprofit organization, found that 81 percent of women and 43 percent of men have experienced some form of sexual harassment throughout their lives. All that to say, it is more than imperative that college campuses, such as the UI\u2019s, use this four-year stretch of time that most students spend at a university or college to educate rising generations on the devastation and intrinsic destruction of sexual harassment and assault. And then, staff and faculty of the university must set the example by encouraging students away from that power-hungry, position-abusing epidemic. Because the problem of sexual harassment and assault is pressing, and because college comes at such a critical time in a person\u2019s life, it\u2019s now that we must be intentional about confronting it. And with universities propelling thousands of students forward into powerhouse careers, it\u2019s crucial that we keep the conversation going \u2014 and even more so that we keep taking action against the heart-splintering devastation that comes when positions of power are taken advantage of.", "7753_110.pdf": "Home \ue803Faculty \ue803University of Iowa Fires Professor Over Sexual Misconduct Business Professor Jeffrey B. Nock has been fired by the University of Iowa for violating the sexual harassment policy. He was taking pictures of women working out at university\u2019s Campus Recreation and Wellness Center. Nock was issued criminal trespass and harassment warning after the incident came to the notice of university officials on April 25. In June, he was barred University of Iowa Fires Professor Over Sexual Misconduct By Staff Writer September 19, 2018 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Fires Professor Over Sexual Misconduct 1/2 from entering the campus wellness center for six months. \u201c[He is] no longer employed by the University of Iowa,\u201d Jeneane Beck, the assistant vice president for External Relations, told The Daily Iowan last week. On August 30, a group of protesters gathered outside Iowa\u2019s Tippie College of Business calling for ousting of the professor think it\u2019s just really ridiculous that not only is the university not firing perpetrators, which is inherently abhorrent, but on top of that, students are going to be distracted from their education because there are perpetrators teaching,\u201d Iowa student and advocate against sexual violence Elena Greene told The Daily Iowan. However, Nock\u2019s attorney Leon Spies has said that his client was \u201cwrongly\u201d terminated by the university and said Nock \u201cintends to exercise every effort to right the wrongs inflicted by the university in terminating his employment.\u201d 2/22/25, 10:42 University of Iowa Fires Professor Over Sexual Misconduct 2/2"} |
8,443 | Stephen A. Sonstein | University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee | [
"8443_101.pdf",
"8443_102.pdf",
"8443_103.pdf"
] | {"8443_101.pdf": "898 F.2d 533 52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 809, 53 Empl. Prac. Dec 39,770, 58 2635, 59 Ed. Law Rep. 335 Katherine KING, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v the SYSTEM, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Stephen A. Sonstein and Franklin Stein, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 88-3481, 88-3482, 89-1381 and 89-1477. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Dec. 14, 1989. Decided March 22, 1990. As Amended March 22, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 23, 1990. I. Walter Kelly, Sutton & Kelly, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant. Nadim Sahar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wisconsin Dept. of Justice, Michael D. Schuman, Sodos, Schuman & Pieper, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees. Before and MANION, Circuit Judges. FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This is a sex discrimination case against the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) and several of its employees filed by a tenure-track professor who was denied contract renewal. The suit was filed under both 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 jury issued a special verdict under Sec. 1983, finding discrimination, harassment, and retaliation by three employees of and vicarious liability of UWM. The district court granted judgment n.o.v. for all the defendants except Stephen Sonstein, a tenured professor at UWM. The district court also made parallel findings on the Title claim. Sonstein appeals the verdict against him and King cross-appeals the judgments n.o.v. We affirm on all counts. 1 Katherine King was hired in 1980 as an assistant professor of occupational therapy at the School of Allied Health Professions at UWM. Her appointment consisted of a three-year term, renewable for a second three-year term, renewable again for either a tenured career appointment or a one-year, terminal appointment. Her contract was renewed for the second three-year term, but a unanimous committee voted not to renew her contract for a seventh year. Subsequent to her non-renewal, King brought this suit alleging that during her employment at UWM, various members of the faculty sexually harassed or otherwise sexually discriminated against her and that is vicariously liable for their actions. Only the claims against two members of the faculty at UWM, Steven Sonstein and Franklin Stein, are appealed. 2 Steven Sonstein served as Assistant Dean and tenured member of the faculty in the School of Allied Health Professions. During the fall term of 1980, Sonstein, acting as Assistant Dean, 3 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 1/9 approached King and discussed with her various problems faced by new professors and various aspects of the operation of the program. As the fall term of 1980 proceeded, King became concerned because Sonstein began making suggestive innuendos as well as leering at her in a sexually suggestive fashion. In October and November of 1980, Sonstein became progressively more bold and offensive with respect to his sexual behavior toward King. He repeatedly leered at King and would from time to time touch her, rub up against her, place objects between her legs, make suggestive remarks and comment upon various parts of her body. Sonstein's behavior was blatant enough for other faculty members to notice and comment upon. King eventually requested that Sonstein stop treating her as he was, but he ignored these requests. In late December of 1980, King attended the department's annual Christmas party. During the party, King went into the bathroom and Sonstein followed her in. He told King that he \"had to have her\" and that \"he would have her.\" King protested but Sonstein forcibly kissed and fondled her. Eventually, King's boyfriend entered the bathroom and Sonstein relented. After King left the party, Sonstein directed similar behavior towards other women, despite requests that he stop. 4 After this incident, King discussed the problem with Sonstein and during the next year and three months he refrained from touching her. Then, in February, 1982, Sonstein falsely accused King of using UWM's photocopying equipment for personal use. This accusation was quite serious and was made shortly before King's contract renewal hearing. She was eventually cleared of the charges, and her contract was renewed. King, by then, had filed a sexual harassment charge against Sonstein with the office for Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. This charge was pursued until a settlement was reached. As part of the resolution of this charge, Sonstein abstained from voting on matters relating to King's appointment. 5 King also made allegations against Professor Franklin Stein, the Director of the Occupational Therapy Program. The facts in this allegation, as in many claims of subtle discrimination, were much more nebulous. King argued that Stein subjected her to salary and workload disparities, unprecedented student evaluations, and poor appraisals. In addition, King argued that Stein mistreated her at faculty meetings, limited her research time, and wrongfully interfered in the tenure process. King supported these allegations with a variety of incidents occurring over the six year period she was with UWM. For example, she argued that Stein attempted to limit her research time and increase her workload by trying to de-fund her \"grant buy-out\" time, which is research time created by receiving a grant to pay for a substitute to fulfill the teaching load. As a result of Stein's actions, King prepared a grievance to present to the departmental Executive Committee. Before submitting her grievance, King attempted to have Stein removed from the Committee that would hear the grievance. The Committee, however, refused to remove Stein until it could examine the nature and seriousness of the grievance. It did not, however, indicate that if the grievance was potentially serious, that Stein would not be removed from consideration of the grievance. Eventually the grievance was submitted to the University's Faculty Rights & Responsibilities Committee which found that King failed to present sufficient evidence to establish a viable claim. 6 King also alleged that Stein interfered with the contract renewal process. King had decided, for health reasons, that she did not wish to undergo renewal evaluations during her seventh year. She asked to go on a leave of absence with pay for the year and for a stay of the tenure clock. Stein refused on the basis that had never before granted leave with pay. He maintained that standard policy was only to allow leaves of absence without pay. King alleged that Stein's denial was motivated by sexual animus in that he could have created a special exception for her. She eventually refused to take the offered leave without pay, and thus came up for contract renewal. King's health problems prevented her from appearing at her scheduled consideration for renewal, so she submitted her candidacy on the basis of her record. Stein was chosen to present her materials in her absence because he was the person on the faculty most familiar with her work. King objected to his appointment as her presenter because she felt that he would sexually discriminate against her by not presenting her material in its best light. 7 When the decision came to vote on her contract renewal, Stein, along with a unanimous committee, voted not to renew her contract on the basis of lack of endeavor in the area of 8 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 2/9 II. scholarly publications, lack of commitment in presenting theoretical, clinical or research papers, inability to make use of research time, and a lack of activity in professional associations. In short, the Committee found that King had wholly failed to meet the expectations made of faculty members, whether it was because of discriminatory treatment or her own failings. As a result, her contract was not renewed. King raised a variety of legal claims based on these facts. She sued under both 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and Title VII, claiming environmental sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, retaliation in the exercise of protected rights, and deprivation of a property interest without due process of law. These claims were made against Sonstein, Stein and two other members of the faculty. The case was tried to a jury on the section 1983 counts and simultaneously to the judge on the Title claims. The jury found, in a special verdict, that Sonstein subjected her to sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, and retaliation and that Stein subjected her to sexual discrimination, retaliation, and deprivation of a property interest without due process. In addition, it found liable for sexual discrimination, deprivation of a property interest without due process and failure to protect her from sexual discrimination, and it found two other members of the department liable for discrimination. The jury awarded $65,000 for past compensation and benefits, $150,000 for loss of future earning capacity, and $60,000 in pain and suffering, with these amounts not allocated among the individual defendants. In addition, the jury awarded punitive damages of $30,000 against Sonstein and $40,000 against Stein. 9 The defendants moved for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative, a new trial. They claimed that there was no evidence of discrimination or retaliation in the record, no property interest in contract renewal, and no harassment based on sex. The district court largely agreed and granted the defendants' motion for judgment n.o.v. on all of the counts except the harassment claim against Sonstein. With respect to discrimination, the court held that King was not subject to salary or workload disparities, discriminatory treatment with respect to grant buy- out time, or discrimination in the tenure/contract renewal process. 10 As to the retaliatory actions, the district court found that Sonstein did not partake in any vote or action taken against King, as per the agreement resulting from the charge, and that Stein's decision to vote against her contract renewal was motivated solely by her lack of professional achievements. It also found that King had no property interest in the renewal of her contract, via Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). It dismissed her claims against the other two individuals, and found that the eleventh amendment immunized from suit under section 1983. Finally, the district court found that because King had been discharged for legitimate reasons and not for reasons relating to her sexual harassment claims, the jury's award for back pay and loss of future earnings were not substantiated. The damages were accordingly reduced to pain and suffering ($60,000) and punitive damages ($30,000) against Sonstein. Parallel findings were made under King's Title claim and no additional damages were awarded. 11 On appeal, King alleges sexual discrimination based on disparate treatment, environmental sexual harassment, retaliation resulting from her complaints of this treatment, and deprivation of a property interest without due process. She makes these claims against both Stein and Sonstein under both Title and section 1983. As the applicable law for both Stein and Sonstein is largely the same, we begin with a review of the established law governing both these claims. 12 King's claims of workload and salary disparaties, lack of guidance, and unequal treatment during the tenure/contract renewal process all fall under the disparate treatment analysis of Title VII. Title makes it illegal for employers \"to discriminate against any individual ... because of such individual's ... sex.\" 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-2(a)(1). To be actionable, claims of disparate treatment must affect the terms or conditions of employment. Id. Proof of disparate treatment on the basis of sex is much the same as for race, see Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 97 S.Ct. 1843, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977), except that the employer may offer a bona fide occupational qualification for the disparate treatment. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-2(e)(1). The plaintiff may either offer direct proof of different treatment on the basis of sex, see Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989), or may use the 13 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 3/9 III. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), burden-shifting method of proof. The issue for review in this case is whether, under McDonnell Douglas, King established a prima facie case that she was subject to disparate treatment. King also claims she was subject to environmental sexual harassment, which is also recognized under Title VII. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986). The standard of proof for a claim of sexual harassment is somewhat different from the proof for disparate treatment. In these cases, a plaintiff establishes her claim by demonstrating that the employer \"has created a hostile or abusive working environment.\" Id. at 2405. Under this analysis, a loss of a tangible job benefit is not necessary since the harassment itself affects the terms or conditions of employment. Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934, 945 (D.C.Cir.1981). The harassment, however, \"must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment.\" Vinson, 106 S.Ct. at 2405 (citations omitted). It must deny the plaintiff \"the right to participate in the work place on equal footing with others similarly situated.\" Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 798 F.2d 210 (7th Cir.1986). See also Bohen v. City of East Chicago, Ind., 799 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir.1986). Although a single act can be enough, Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1186-87, generally, repeated incidents create a stronger claim of hostile environment, with the strength of the claim depending on the number of incidents and the intensity of each incident. In applying this test, we look at the harassment from both the objective and subjective viewpoint of the plaintiff: in order to find discrimination, the court must conclude that \"the conduct would adversely affect both a reasonable person and the particular plaintiff bringing the action.\" Brooms v. Regal Tube Co., 881 F.2d 412 (7th Cir.1989). 14 Regardless of whether recovery is promised under environmental sexual harassment or disparate treatment, the damages are the same: the plaintiff may seek reinstatement, back pay, and attorney's fees. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5(g). Compensatory, nominal, and punitive damages are not available under Title VII. Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1184. Under claims of harassment, there will often be no loss of tangible job benefits, so recovery of back pay is extremely limited. In fact, the district court in this case found that while King lost her job, she did not prove that harassment caused the loss and therefore did not award back pay to King. 15 King also sued under section 1983, claiming that sexual harassment by Sonstein was a violation of the equal protection clause, under which she can recover compensatory and punitive damages. We have held that sexual harassment is a violation of equal protection, Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1185, although the precise parameters of this cause of action have not been well defined. In general, the claim follows the contours of Title claims. One difference between sexual harassment under equal protection and under Title VII, however, is that the defendant must intend to harass under equal protection, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 1719-21, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), but not under Title VII, where the inquiry is solely from the plaintiff's perspective. Vinson, 106 S.Ct. at 2406; Brooms, 881 F.2d at 419. In the present case, the dispute centers around the issue of intent. To show intent for equal protection purposes, \"it is not necessary to show that all women employees were sexually harassed. Harassment of the plaintiff alone because of her sex is enough.\" Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1187. 16 Finally, King claims she was retaliated against for exercising her first amendment rights. All public employees have a right to engage in free speech and self-expression while participating in political and social affairs. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). If protected speech is a substantial factor in a negative employment action by a public employer, the employee may have a claim to reinstatement with backpay. Mt. Healthy City School Dist. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 568, 574-77, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). To prevail King must, under Mt. Healthy, identify a negative employment decision, and prove that some protected speech was the cause of the decision. Id. 17 Our standard of review for King's claims is well established. We review the district court's granting of a judgment n.o.v. de novo. Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896, 900 (7th Cir.1984 motion for judgment n.o.v. should be denied where the evidence, along with all reasonable inferences, when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, is such that 18 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 4/9 A. Claims Against Sonstein reasonable persons may reach different conclusions. Hohmann v. Packard Instrument Co., 471 F.2d 815, 819 (7th Cir.1973). Judgment n.o.v. should be granted if the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion, that the moving party is entitled to judgment. The district court found that \"Sonstein sexually harassed King in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution [and his] actions created an abusive working environment for King in violation of Title VII.\" Certainly, it would appear from the facts that the district court's findings are amply supported. Sonstein repeatedly verbally assaulted King, fondled her, and at one point, physically attacked her. His advances were unwelcome and he was so told. The district court and the jury respectively found that these advances created an abusive working environment sufficient to alter the conditions of employment in violation of Title and equal protection. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to King, it is difficult to imagine that a reasonable person, along with this particular plaintiff, would not be adversely affected. 19 Sonstein advances only one argument in his defense and only defends the equal protection claim. It is an argument which we believe to be profoundly flawed. He claims that his actions were merely the result of his desire for King as an individual and, therefore, were not sex- based harassment. To support this claim he cites Huebschen v. Dept. of Health and Social Sciences, 716 F.2d 1167, 1171 (7th Cir.1983). In Huebschen we held that sexual harassment was actionable under the equal protection clause. In applying the law to the facts of the case, we found that the claim of sexual discrimination had not been proven because the plaintiff was merely a \"jilted lover;\" the defendant, a female supervisor, harassed the plaintiff not because he was a male but because he had spurned her. On this basis, we held that the defendant's actions were the result of a personal vendetta and not sexually discriminatory. 20 Sonstein divides his argument applying Huebschen into two parts. First he claims that King was not a member of a protected class since she was simply a member of the class of people whom Sonstein desired to have an affair with. But King was and remains a woman. That is all that is required. Volk, 845 F.2d at 1433. Second, Sonstein argues that he lacked \"hatred of the protected class.\" While violation of the equal protection clause requires discriminatory intent, we can find no \"hatred\" requirement in either the fourteenth amendment itself or the case law. In fact, the opposite may very well be true: a desire to protect women because of paternalism and admiration may be the cause of discriminatory action. For example, state protective laws have been invalidated on Title grounds, Williams v. General Foods Corp., 492 F.2d 399 (7th Cir.1974), as have laws that require women to take maternity leave. Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 94 S.Ct. 791, 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). Similarly, pension systems that presumably benefit women have been invalidated. City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 98 S.Ct. 1370, 55 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978). None of these discriminatory actions evidence a hatred or even a dislike of women. All that is required is that the action taken be motivated by the gender of the plaintiff. No hatred, no animus, and no dislike is required. 21 Nevertheless, Sonstein's arguments may still have some force. The theme of Huebschen is that disparate or harassing treatment is not sexually discriminatory if there is a cause other than gender. If, as a purely personal matter, a boss and a particular employee are not compatible, it would not be sexually discriminatory to harass the employee on that basis. We echoed this theme in Bohen where we stated that \"it is a good defense, however, if the employer can show that the harassment suffered by the plaintiff was directed at the plaintiff because of factors personal to her and not because she is a woman.\" 779 F.2d at 1187 (citing Huebschen). This logic clearly retains vitality: the equal protection clause does not prohibit all negative employment actions against women. 22 Sonstein's argument, therefore, comes down to the assertion that harassment (Sonstein's argument does not address whether the conduct is harassing) based on sexual desire is not based on gender. One argument that Sonstein might advance to this end is that his sexual desire indicates that he did not have a policy of discrimination against womanhood as a whole; it was just King's particular sexual characteristics. We rejected this argument in Bohen where we stated \"an equal protection plaintiff therefore need not prove a discriminatory policy against an entire class; discrimination against the plaintiff because of her membership in the class is by itself enough.\" 799 F.2d at 1187 (citations omitted). See also Volk v. Coler, 845 F.2d 23 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 5/9 1422, 1433 (7th Cir.1988) (plaintiff \"need not prove that an entire class was discriminated against\"). Another argument to support Sonstein's position might be that his desire for a sexual affair was based on her characteristics other than sex, similar to the defendant in Huebschen who disliked the plaintiff as a person. To this end, Sonstein claims it was King as an individual to whom he was attracted, not King as a woman. This argument, however, also misses the point. Sonstein wanted to have an affair, a liaison, illicit sex, a forbidden relationship. His actions are not consistent with platonic love. His actions were based on her gender and motivated by his libido. 24 We have, in fact, previously rejected this very argument in the context of quid pro quo harassment. In quid pro quo cases, a supervisor demands sexual favors from an employee as a condition of employment. This is exactly the situation where a supervisor's only motivation is to have a conjugal relationship with the employee. In Horn v. Duke we considered the argument that the quid pro quo demands based on sexual desire were not based on sex. 755 F.2d 599, 604 (7th Cir.1985). We found that \"[b]ut for Horn's womanhood, Haas would not have demanded sex as a condition of employment. Because of her sex, therefore, Horn was disadvantaged by pressure to submit to an additional, humiliating condition of employment that served no legitimate purpose of the employer.\" Id. In other words, treatment of individual based on sexual desire is sexually motivated. Sonstein's sexual desire does not negate his intent; rather it affirmatively establishes it. 25 Yet a final argument that Sonstein might advance is that because his actions were motivated by her sex, he did not intend to harass her. It is clear, however, that the advances were unwelcome and that Sonstein knew they were unwelcome. This is not the case of a single, innocent, sexual query. Instead, we have repeated, unwelcome advances, fondling and a physical attack. The jury was justified in inferring intent to harass from these facts, and we affirm the verdict of sexual harassment against Sonstein. 26 To recover the $65,000 in past benefits and $150,000 in loss of future earnings, King makes two additional legal claims against Sonstein: retaliation for the exercise of her first amendment rights and discriminatory treatment. We agree with the district court that the facts do not support her claims. Sonstein was unable to deny her past benefits or future earnings because he refrained from participating in decisions regarding her job due to her complaint with the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity. The only retaliatory or discriminatory action that King uses to support her case (or at least that we can discern from her rather opaque brief) is that Sonstein falsely accused her of using the photocopy machine for personal use. This incident does not support King's claim of retaliation because the accusation was made before King exercised her first amendment rights and therefore cannot be said to have been done in retaliation. And if it was discrimination, King did not prove she lost a job benefit, such as past benefits or future earnings, as a result of this incident--her contract was renewed soon after the accusation. She therefore fails to prove that she is entitled to any damages under these claims. 27 King attempts to bolster her arguments by maintaining that harassment, discriminatory treatment, and retaliation caused her to be permanently psychologically disabled, thereby preventing her from fulfilling the tenure requirements or obtaining another job elsewhere in academics. In Williamson v. Handy Button Machine Co., 817 F.2d 1290, 1294-95 (7th Cir.1987), we verified that damages are available for inability to work due to psychological problems resulting from discrimination. Nevertheless, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to King, we conclude that she has failed to prove that harassment, retaliation and discrimination caused her failure to meet the requirements for contract renewal. She offered no evidence that she had performed tenure-quality work prior to the discriminatory treatment or of her ability to perform adequately outside of the allegedly sexually harassing environment. In addition, King was provided with ample time away from during the summer to perform some research or engage in some professional activity. Yet, King failed to present any materials to the committee indicating any effort on her part to undertake such actions. We conclude, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to King, that King failed to prove retaliation or discrimination by Sonstein. Therefore, we affirm the district court's grant of judgment n.o.v. to the defendants on these counts. 28 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 6/9 B. Claims Against Stein King raised claims against Stein for discrimination and retaliation, under both Title and the equal protection clause, as well as deprivation of property without due process. As stated above, to prove retaliation, King must prove that exercise of her first amendment rights was a substantial factor in the adverse action. Mt. Healthy, 97 S.Ct. at 577. Nothing in the record, however, suggests that King was qualified for tenure renewal unanimous committee voted not to renew her contract on the basis of lack of endeavor in the area of scholarly publications, lack of commitment in presenting theoretical, clinical, or research papers, inability to make use of research time, and a lack of activity in professional associations. King offered nothing into evidence to negate the committee's findings or to prove that the committee did not correctly apply its contract renewal criteria. As a result, King has failed to prove that her exercise of first amendment rights was a substantial factor in Stein's vote not to renew her contract. 29 Her discrimination claim fairs no better. The record reflects that King was not subject to salary and workload disparities. At no time during any academic year, or even any semester, did King ever carry the heaviest teaching load. In fact, for the entire 1983-84 school year, King had the lightest load. There is also no evidence that she had a heavier load than was required of men in the department. Moreover, her salary was not different from other faculty members. She was hired in 1980 at a salary of $17,000. The next year her salary was increased to $18,985 and a man named McPherson, was hired by the department for a comparable position at $18,000. Each year she taught, her salary was increased and throughout that time, McPherson's salary was lower than her salary. In addition, there is no evidence, other than her bald assertion, that her salary was not comparable to the salaries of male faculty other than McPherson. 30 We are more troubled by the other, more nebulous incidents which King claims are sexually discriminatory, namely Stein's supposed limiting of her research time and mistreatment during the tenure process. It is difficult to tell from a cold record what the motivations were for a particular action, say, for example, Stein's decision to act as her presenter at the contract renewal hearing, or for example, the alleged attempts to limit her grant-buy-out time. For this reason, we defer to the jury and the district court for these types of findings. It is clear in this case, however, that no term, condition or privilege of employment was affected as a result of these actions. She had more time and funding for research than did any other faculty member in her program and there is no indication that additional research time would have brought her close to the contract renewal requirements. Similarly, it is clear that her problems with non-renewal went much deeper than merely who presented her to the committee; she wholly failed to meet the renewal requirements. To establish a prima facie case under McDonnell Douglas, she must prove that she was subject to treatment different from other members of the department that affected a term or condition of employment. She has not met this burden; her contract renewal chances were not diminished by Stein. 31 King also claims that Stein deprived her of a property right without due process of law. She makes two due process arguments. First, she claims that and Stein did not provide her with a forum to secure redress for discrimination. She cites, Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 102 S.Ct. 1148, 1157, 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982), for the proposition that a state- created inability to present claims of entitlement violate due process. Logan, however, is inapposite because here the state has not precluded her from bringing a claim securing her state-guaranteed rights. The rights she claims she could not enforce were not state-created property interests. They are federal statutory and constitutional claims. In addition, at all times during King's appointment had an operating office through which to pursue her claims. In fact, she maintained an action against Sonstein through that office which resulted in a favorable settlement. And if she were unsuccessful there, she was not precluded from bringing a claim in state court. 32 King also argues that she was deprived of a property interest without due process during her contract renewal procedings. This claim, however, is precluded by Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). In Roth, the Court held that an assistant professor terminated after one year had no property interest in his continued employment where his unilateral expectations had no basis in statute, contract, or mutually explicit understanding. King's appointment only lasted through her sixth year. She had no 33 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 7/9 IV. property interest in renewal. In addition, it is clear that there was no explicit mutual understanding: King's letter granting her re-appointment in her third year stated that the appointment was as a probationary faculty member. Without more evidence of a property interest, King's claim fails. Finally, the district court granted Stein's motion for judgment n.o.v. regarding the punitive damages against Stein. Because we have affirmed the district court's grant of judgment n.o.v. against Stein on all the substantive counts, the punitive damage claim also fails. 34 The judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED. 35 MANION, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. 36 concur in the majority's opinion to the extent it holds defendants free of liability. However disagree with the majority's conclusion that Steven Sonstein violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when he sexually harassed Catherine King. 37 In the fall of 1980, King was serving her first term as a faculty member. She described Sonstein as being very helpful and \"appreciated Dean Sonstein's advice because she believed he was acting in good faith and he was the only supervisory level professor who took the time to talk with her.\" However, by November the conversations turned from helpful hints to sexual overtures. Between November and January there were several unwelcome advances, one of which was intolerable. In January, in a straightforward meeting with Sonstein, King set him straight, and demanded that such conduct cease. After that, for the most part Sonstein's overtures, inept, boorish, or uncouth as they may have been, ended year or so later King accused Sonstein of retaliating against her when he claimed she was using the copy machine for personal matters, but that was resolved with an administrative settlement. 38 The pivotal question is whether the apparent hostile atmosphere resulted from Sonstein's discriminatory treatment of King based on her membership in a class--female, as in Bohen v. City of East Chicago, 799 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir.1986)--or whether it was confined to a \"group\" of persons (King) with whom Sonstein had sought to have a romantic affair as in Huebschen v. Dept. of Health and Social Services, 716 F.2d 1167 (7th Cir.1983). The majority states that Sonstein \"claims that King was not a member of a protected class as she was simply a member of the class of people whom Sonstein desired to have an affair with. But King was and remains a woman. That is all that is required.\" Majority opinion at 538. The majority cites Volk v. Coler, 845 F.2d 1422 (7th Cir.1988). But neither Volk nor Bohen says that being a woman is all that is required. Rather, these cases require harassment of the individual plaintiff because of her gender. 39 It does not appear that Sonstein harassed King because, for example, he did not like having women in the department. Rather, he harassed King because he was physically attracted to her albeit because she was, in his mind, an attractive woman. Huebschen held that \"the proper classification, if there was one at all, was the group of persons with whom [defendant] had or sought to have a romantic affair.... [W]e simply are not persuaded that the Equal Protection Clause should protect such a class.\" Huebschen, 716 F.2d at 1172. Although there is some evidence that Sonstein made snide remarks and some minor overtures to other women faculty, Sonstein put King in a class by herself as his romantic target. The only way Huebschen would not apply is if we were to say that the classification of the target of a romantic affair applies only to men and not to women. Obviously such is not the case. 40 Sonstein's boorish advances were confined to King on account of his attraction to her personal qualities. Sonstein harassed Katherine King because she was Katherine King, not because she was female. \"In an Equal Protection claim, the petitioner faces the tougher standard of proving purposeful and intentional acts of discrimination based on her membership in a particular class, not just on an individual basis.\" Forrester v. White, 846 F.2d 29, 32 (7th Cir.1988). Such activity may be actionable, but not as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Because believe Huebschen controls the disposition of the claim against Sonstein respectfully dissent. 41 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 8/9 \u00ab up 2/22/25, 10:43 898 F.2d 533 9/9", "8443_102.pdf": "King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990 District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin - 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) October 4, 1990 748 F. Supp. 686 (1990) Katherine KING, Plaintiff, v the SYSTEM; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Frederick W. Pairent, individually, and in his official capacity as Dean of the School of Allied Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Franklin Stein, individually, and in his official capacities as a faculty member and Director of the Occupational Therapy Program, Health Sciences Department, School of Allied Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Stephen A. Sonstein, individually, and in his official capacities as a faculty member, Assistant Dean, and member and Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Health Sciences Department, School of Allied Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and James J. McPherson, individually, and in his official capacity as a faculty member of the Health Sciences Department, School of Allied Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-C-718. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 4, 1990. *687 Walter F. Kelly, Sutton & Kelly, Thomas M. Domer, Schneidman Myers Dowling & Blumenfield, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 1/14 Nadim Sahar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wisconsin Dept. of Justice, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge During April 1987, a three-week jury trial was conducted in the above-captioned case in which plaintiff Katherine King (\"King\") obtained a favorable special verdict against four of the six defendants. The jury awarded King $345,000 in damages. On November 21, 1988, this court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (\"JNOV\"). This court granted on each of King's claims against the *688 defendants except her sexual harassment claim against defendant Stephen A. Sonstein (\"Sonstein\"). This court then awarded King $60,000 in compensatory damages against Sonstein, the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. This court also awarded King $30,000 in punitive damages against Sonstein. Finally, pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1988 this court awarded King her reasonable attorney's fees for the claim on which she prevailed. On January 27, 1989, this court amended the judgment in King's action to state that the defendant University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents shall indemnify the entire $90,000 judgment. King and the defendants appealed this court's November 21, 1988 order. On March 22, 1990, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, 898 F.2d 533 affirmed this court's decision on all counts. The only remaining issue in this case is the attorney's fees which King is entitled to. On February 6, 1989, King's attorneys, Walter F. Kelly (\"Kelly\") and Thomas M. Domer (\"Domer\"), submitted an itemized accounting of the fees and costs expended on King's successful sexual harassment claim against Sonstein. In his affidavit, Kelly stated: (1) that Kelly had worked 1,419.2 total hours on King's case; (2) that Kelly had worked 990 hours at a rate of $200 per hour on King's successful claim against Sonstein; (3) that Domer worked 257.2 hours at a rate of $120 per hour and 31.8 hours at a rate of $125 per hour on King's 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 2/14 successful claim against Sonstein; (4) that the total lodestar fee (hours worked multiplied by the hourly rate) for King's successful claim is $233,039 which is comprised of Kelly's lodestar of $198,200 and Domer's lodestar of $34,839; (5) that this court should enhance the total lodestar fee by a multiplier of 1.5 bringing the total attorney's fee award to $349,558.50; (6) that the costs and disbursements of Kelly's and Domer's law firm were $6,344.51 and $2,342.69 respectively for a total of $8,687.20; and (7) that the total fees and costs King is entitled to is $358,245.70 (Feb. 3, 1989 Kelly Aff. \u00b6\u00b6 12-13). On May 18, 1989, the defendants filed a brief in opposition to King's petition for attorney's fees in which they argued that \"the attorney's fees sought by the plaintiff are excessive, unsupported by the evidence and contrary to every legal approach to the determination of a reasonable attorney's fee.\" (May 18, 1989 Brief in Opp. at 2). Specifically, defendants claim that: (1) King is not entitled to any multiplier or enhancement of the lodestar fee; (2) King can recover only the attorney's fees associated with the litigation of the sexual harassment claim against Sonstein; (3) there must be some proportionality between the attorney's fee award and King's damage recovery of $90,000; (4) the hourly rate Kelly and Doman used to calculate the lodestar fee exceed the prevailing rates in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, community; (5) King can recover only those expenses associated with her successful sexual harassment claim against Sonstein; and (6) King cannot recover the costs of her expert witnesses which are in excess of the statutory costs provided in 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1821 Title 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1988 states that: In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981 of the Revised Statutes [42 \u00a7\u00a7 1981-1983, 1985, 1986], ... the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs. The United States Supreme Court has often considered the meaning of the term \"reasonable attorney's fee\" and has repeatedly held that: 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 3/14 \"[t]he most useful starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.\" This figure, commonly referred to as the \"lodestar,\" is presumed to be the reasonable fee contemplated by \u00a7 1988. City of Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561, 568, 106 S. Ct. 2686, 2691, 91 L. Ed. 2d 466 *689 (1986) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 1939, 76 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1983)). The Court has also repeatedly stated that when the fee applicant has carried his burden of proving that the number of hours and the hourly rate are reasonable, then the lodestar amount is presumed to be a reasonable fee. Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S. 87, 109 S. Ct. 939, 945, 103 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1989); Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 564, 106 S. Ct. 3088, 3097, 92 L. Ed. 2d 439 (1986). In the present case, however, the defendants have argued that both the number of hours and the rates claimed by King are excessive. A. The Allowable Number of Hours The defendants argue that the number of hours claimed by King are excessive because they represent approximately seventy-five (75%) percent of the total number of hours worked on King's case even though King only prevailed on one (1) of twenty (20) claims against one (1) of five (5) defendants. The defendants argue that this court should only award King's attorneys twenty (20%) percent of the total hours they worked because King only prevailed against twenty (20%) percent of the defendants. The Supreme Court and Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals have rejected the use of a mechanical claim-chopping approach in determining the number of hours allowable under a \u00a7 1988 attorney's fee request. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 436 n. 11, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 1941 n. 11, 76 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1983); Lenard v. Argento, 808 F.2d 1242, 1245 (7th Cir. 1987). The Supreme Court has stated that in situations where a plaintiff prevails on only a few of many claims, the district court should utilize a two-step inquiry in determining the allowable hours. The district court should determine 1) whether or not the successful and unsuccessful claims were related and 2) did the degree of success obtained by the plaintiff justify the hours on the unsuccessful but related claims. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434, 103 S. Ct. at 1939. If the unsuccessful claims are unrelated to the successful ones, then \"these unrelated claims [must] be treated as if they had been raised in separate lawsuits, and 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 4/14 therefore no fee may be awarded for services on the unsuccessful claim.\" Id. at 435, 103 S. Ct. at 1940. King prevailed on a sexual harassment claim against Sonstein and lost on the following claims: 1) sex discrimination against defendants Sonstein, Franklin Stein (\"Stein\"), James J. McPherson (\"McPherson\"), Frederick W. Pairent (\"Pairent\"), and the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee (\"UWM\"); 2) free speech retaliation against Sonstein, Stein, McPherson, and Pairent; 3) deprivation of property without due process against Stein, McPherson, Pairent, and UWM; 4) defamation/deprivation of liberty interest against McPherson, Pairent, and UWM; 5) failure to protect from sexual harassment against Pairent and UWM; and 6) sexual harassment against UWM. This court finds that of these claims, the following were unrelated to King's sexual harassment claim against Sonstein because they did not involve similar facts or legal theories: 1) the free speech retaliation claim against all the defendants accept Sonstein; 2) the deprivation of property without due process against defendants Stein, McPherson, Pairent, and UWM; and 3) the defamation/deprivation of liberty claim against defendants McPherson, Pairent, and UWM. Thus, the hours which King's attorneys worked on these claims are not allowed to be included in calculating the lodestar fee. King's attorneys have provided to this court two itemized lists of all the hours they spent on King's claims. These lists, however, do not describe the hours spent by the attorneys on each of the separate claims. Thus, this court cannot determine from the lists how many hours apply to claims related to the sexual harassment claim against Sonstein. This court, however, can determine the number of hours which should be used in calculating the lodestar fee. King's attorneys claim that they utilized the Supreme Court's \"relatedness\" test to determine the number of hours which they were allowed to include in calculating the lodestar fee (Feb. 3, 1989 Kelly Aff. \u00b6 8). This court is *690 convinced from reviewing the itemized lists that King's attorneys made a good faith effort to include in the lodestar calculation only those hours which related to King's sexual harassment claim against Sonstein. Thus, this court will accept King's attorneys' claim that they worked 1,279 hours on either King's sexual harassment claim against Sonstein or other related claims. The 1,279 hours worked, however, does not satisfy the second part of the Supreme Court's test which requires this court to inquire as to whether or not \"the plaintiff achieve[d] a level of success that makes the hours reasonably expended a satisfactory basis for a fee award?\" Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434, 103 S. Ct. at 1940. The level of success King achieved in her case does not justify her being reimbursed for seventy-five (75%) percent of the hours her attorneys worked on the case. King's primary claim was that she was discriminated against 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 5/14 by the defendants because of her sex. Although King's sexual harassment claim against Sonstein was related to her discrimination claim, it was not the focus of her complaint or trial, and her prevailing on only this claim is not a major success. Thus, the 1,279 hours requested by King is not a satisfactory or reasonable basis for determining King's attorney's fee. This court finds that King's limited success requires that she be reimbursed for sixty-five (65%) percent of the 1,279 total hours which her attorneys have submitted as the reasonable hours spent on her prevailing claim. This percentage equals 831.35 allowable hours which represents approximately forty-nine (49%) percent of the total number of hours worked on all claims, 1,708.2. This court finds that 831.35 hours is appropriate and accurately reflects the degree of success which King obtained. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 436, 103 S. Ct. at 1941. In addition, the 831.35 allowable hours is divided between King's two attorneys to reflect the relative time each spent on claims related to her successful sexual harassment claim against Sonstein. Accordingly, attorney Kelly has 643.5 allowable hours and attorney Domer has 187.85 allowable hours. B. The Hourly Rate The defendants also have argued that the $200 hourly rate King has requested for attorney Kelly, and the $120 and $125 hourly rates requested for attorney Domer exceed the prevailing rates in the Milwaukee community. The defendants argue that historical hourly rates should be applied to the work Kelly performed during the 1983-1987 time period, and that a general hourly rate of $100 should be utilized for both Kelly and Domer for all time periods. First, the Supreme Court has held that the market rate existing at the time of the attorney's fee award is an appropriate rate to be used in calculating the lodestar fee because it compensates the attorney for the delay in payment. The Court in Missouri v. Jenkins stated: Clearly, compensation received several years after the services were rendered as it frequently is in complex civil rights litigation is not equivalent to the same dollar amount received reasonably promptly as the legal services are performed, 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 6/14 as would normally be the case in private billings. We agree, therefore, that an appropriate adjustment for delay in payment whether by the application of current rather than historic hourly rates or otherwise is within the contemplation of the statute. 491 U.S. 274, 109 S. Ct. 2463, 2469, 105 L. Ed. 2d 229 (emphasis added). Second, the Court has repeatedly held that attorney's fees awarded under \u00a7 1988 are to be based on market rates for the services rendered. Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 109 S. Ct. 2463, 105 L. Ed. 2d 229 (1989); Blanchard, 489 U.S. 87, 109 S. Ct. 939, 103 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1989); Riverside, 477 U.S. 561, 106 S. Ct. 2686, 91 L. Ed. 2d 466 (1986). Thus, this court will utilize the current market rate in Milwaukee in awarding attorney's fees to King in order to compensate King's attorneys for the delay in payment in this case. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the best evidence of the appropriate hourly rate to be used in calculating *691 the lodestar amount for an attorney with fee- paying clients \"is the hourly rate customarily charged by counsel or by her law firm.\" Tomazzoli v. Sheedy, 804 F.2d 93, 98 (7th Cir.1986). Kelly states in his affidavit that his hourly billing rate as of February 1989 was $200 per hour, and that the prevailing market rate for a civil rights attorney with his experience in Milwaukee also was $200 per hour at that time (Feb. 3, 1989 Kelly Aff. at \u00b6 9). Kelly also submitted affidavits of attorneys involved in similar civil rights litigation in Milwaukee to support his $200 hourly rate. In addition, Domer states in his affidavit that his hourly rate was $120 in 1985, 1986, and 1987 and $125 in 1988 and 1989. The defendants, however, claim that Kelly's hourly rate of $200 exceeds the Milwaukee market rate for civil rights attorneys. The defendants, however, did not file any affidavits to refute Kelly's or Domer's claims that their billing rates were $200 and $125 per hour in 1989. This court has reviewed the evidence filed by the parties and finds that the hourly rates submitted by Kelly and Domer are slightly high for the early 1989 time period. The affidavits submitted by Kelly support an hourly range of $170 to $200 for his services and an hourly range of $90 to $125 for Domer's services. These ranges, however, have certainly increased since early 1989. Thus, this court concludes that a current hourly rate of $200 for Kelly and $125 for Domer is reasonable and appropriate in order to compensate for the lengthy delay in payment. C. Calculating the Lodestar 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 7/14 As discussed earlier, the lodestar fee is determined by multiplying the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation by a reasonable hourly rate. In the present case, this court has found that attorney Kelly reasonably expended 643.5 hours and attorney Domer reasonably expended 187.85 hours. In addition, this court has found that $200 is the reasonable hourly rate for attorney Kelly and $125 is the reasonable hourly rate for attorney Domer. Thus, the lodestar fee for attorneys Kelly and Domer are $128,700 and $23,481.25 respectively, which equals a total lodestar fee of $152,181.25. D. The Multiplier King has requested that the lodestar fee be enhanced by fifty (50%) percent. The Supreme Court in Blum v. Stenson greatly limited the circumstances in which the lodestar fee can be enhanced. 465 U.S. 886, 104 S. Ct. 1541, 79 L. Ed. 2d 891 (1984). The Court held that the \"novelty and complexity of the issues\" and \"the special skill and experience of counsel\" are reflected in the lodestar fee, and therefore cannot be used as a basis for enhancement. Id. at 898-99, 104 S. Ct. at 1549 (1984). In addition, the Court held that although the \"quality of representation\" and the results obtained by counsel are generally reflected in the lodestar fee, these two factors can be used to adjust the lodestar fee upwards \"only in the rare case where the fee applicant offers specific evidence to show that the quality of service rendered was superior to that one reasonably should expect in light of the hourly rates charged and that the success was `exceptional.'\" Id. at 899, 104 S. Ct. at 1549 (citing Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435, 103 S.Ct. at 1940). First, this court finds that the quality of representation King's attorneys provided to her was excellent. Second, this court also finds that had it not been for the excellent quality of her attorneys she probably would not have prevailed on any claims, and therefore the results obtained were exceptional. Finally, this court finds that although the attorneys were excellent and the outcome was exceptional given the specific facts of the case, the outcome was not exceptional when one considers the hourly rate this court has awarded to King's lead attorney. The $200 hourly rate awarded for attorney Kelly is a premium rate for Milwaukee and accurately reflects the excellent representation he provided and the exceptional result he obtained. Thus, King's lodestar fee cannot be enhanced based on these factors. King, however, argues that the lodestar should be enhanced because without *692 this enhancement, prospective civil rights plaintiffs in Milwaukee would have a difficult time retaining an attorney. King claims that this consideration justifies the enhancement of the 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 8/14 lodestar and cites the Supreme Court's decision in Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air as support for her claim. 483 U.S. 711, 107 S. Ct. 3078, 97 L. Ed. 2d 585 (1987). The issue before the Court in Delaware Valley was \"whether, when a plaintiff prevails, its attorney should or may be awarded separate compensation for assuming the risk of not being paid.\" Id. at 715, 107 S. Ct. at 3081. Although the federal statute permitting the fee award in Delaware Valley was 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 7604(d), the Court also considered \u00a7 1988 when deciding the case. 483 U.S. at 713, 723, 107 S. Ct. at 3080, 3085. The Supreme Court's decision in Delaware Valley is not a conclusive holding on the question of whether or not a lodestar enhancement for risk assumption is permissible. Four of the five Justices who joined in the majority opinion concluded \"that multipliers or other enhancement of a reasonable lodestar fee to compensate for assuming the risk of loss is impermissible under the usual fee-shifting statutes.\" Delaware Valley, 483 U.S. at 727, 107 S. Ct. at 3087 (emphasis added). Justice O'Connor, however, who was the fifth Justice concurring in the judgment of the majority, did not agree with this portion of the majority decision. Thus, the majority proceeded with its analysis and held that: Even if \u00a7 304(d) and other typical fee-shifting statutes [\u00a7 1988] are construed to permit supplementing the lodestar in appropriate cases by paying counsel for assuming the risk of nonpayment, for the reasons set out below, it was error to do so in this case. Id. at 728, 107 S. Ct. at 3087-3088. Justice O'Connor only concurred in part with the four Justices in the majority because she concluded: that Congress did not intend to foreclose consideration of contingency in setting a reasonable fee under fee-shifting provisions such as ... the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1988 also agree that compensation must be based on the difference in market treatment of contingent fee cases as a class, rather than on an assessment of the \"riskiness\" of any particular case. Id. at 731, 107 S. Ct. at 3089. In addition, the four Justices who dissented also concluded that an enhancement of the lodestar to account for risk assumption is permissible. Id. at 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 9/14 735-55, 107 S. Ct. at 3091-3102. Thus, five of the nine Justices believed that \u00a7 1988 permits an enhancement of the lodestar for risk assumption. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has considered the Court's holding on risk enhancement in Delaware Valley and has stated that Justice O'Connor's concurring opinion represents a majority. The Seventh Circuit in Skelton v. General Motors Corp. stated: Justice O'Connor agreed with part of the reasoning of the four-vote plurality and with some of the arguments offered by the four-vote dissent. Her position on risk multipliers thus represents the position of a majority of the Court. Justice O'Connor agreed with the plurality that \"no enhancement for risk is appropriate unless the applicant can establish that without an adjustment for risk the prevailing party `would have faced substantial difficulties in finding counsel in the local or other relevant market.'\" Justice O'Connor also observed that \"`legal' risks or risks peculiar to the case\" are not sufficient to warrant an enhancement of the lodestar. Thus, Justice O'Connor agreed with the dissent that \"compensation for contingency must be based on the difference of contingent fee cases as a class, rather than on an assessment of the `riskiness' of any particular case.\" 860 F.2d 250, 254 n. 3 (1988) cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 53, 107 L. Ed. 2d 22 (1989) (quoting Delaware Valley, 483 U.S. 711, 733-34, 107 S. Ct. 3078, 3090-91, 97 L. Ed. 2d 585.) King has argued that in light of the Delaware Valley and Skelton holdings, the relevant question in her case is whether or not a potential plaintiff in a civil rights or *693 employment discrimination case in the Milwaukee market would have substantial difficulty finding an attorney if there were no risk enhancement of the lodestar fee. This court agrees. King has submitted the affidavits of civil rights plaintiffs attorneys Robert Dowling (\"Dowling\"), Thomas Jacobson (\"Jacobson\"), and Curry First (\"First\") to support her claim that without a risk enhancement a prospective civil rights plaintiff would have a difficult time retaining an attorney. Dowling, Jacobson, and First each state that their legal practice would not be economically viable without an enhancement of the lodestar fee (June 19, 1989 Dowling Aff. \u00b6\u00b6 4-5; June 19, 1989 Jacobson Aff. \u00b6\u00b6 6-10; June 19, 1989 First Aff. \u00b6\u00b6 9-10). The defendants have submitted no evidence to refute King or these attorneys' claims. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 10/14 In addition, during the last twelve (12) months, this court has had a civil rights case in which the plaintiff proceeded pro se because he could not retain competent counsel on a contingency basis even though he had a claim which ultimately was successful (Hearn v. Turnage, 747 F. Supp. 1318 (E.D.Wis.1990)). Finally, this court notes that an attorney's fee award inevitably appears greater than it actually is because the attorney's overhead costs must be paid from the award. Thus, in the present case, King's attorney's salary will not equal the attorney's fee award because he must pay his overhead costs from that award. This court, however, is not convinced that an enhancement of fifty (50%) percent is required to attract competent counsel to engage in civil rights plaintiff work in Milwaukee. Instead, based on the evidence provided by King in this case and this court's experience in the Milwaukee market, this court finds that an enhancement of twenty-five (25%) percent is the appropriate multiplier. This enhancement increases the attorney's fee award in the present case to $190,226.56. E. The Proportionality between Fees and Damages The defendants have argued that there must be some proportionality between the client's monetary recovery and the attorney's fee award, and therefore King's attorney's fee request cannot exceed her total damages award of $90,000. This argument is incorrect as a matter of law because the United States Supreme Court has held that \"[i]n the absence of any indication that Congress intended to adopt a strict rule that attorney's fees under \u00a7 1988 be proportionate to damages recovered, we decline to adopt such a rule ourselves.\" Riverside, 477 U.S. at 581, 106 S. Ct. at 2697 (emphasis added). Thus, King's attorney's fee award is not limited to her damages of $90,000 The defendants argue that King's request for expenses is excessive because it includes 1) costs that are unrelated to her sexual harassment claim against Sonstein and 2) expert witness fees which are in excess of the statutory costs permitted by 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1821. Specifically, defendants argue that the depositions of Pairent, Stein, McPherson, and Lizette Kautzman (\"Kautzman\") were unrelated to King's successful claim, and therefore the costs associated with them should be denied. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that: 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 11/14 In ascertaining what is an appropriate expense award, the district court must exercise its discretion to \"disallow particular expenses that are unreasonable whether because excessive in amount or because they should not have been incurred at all.\" Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co., Div. Dart Industries, Inc., 789 F.2d 540, 553 (7th Cir.1986) (quoting Henry v. Webermeier, 738 F.2d 188, 192 (7th Cir.1984)). This court already has found that King's sex discrimination claim against defendants Pairent, Stein, and McPherson were related to her sexual harassment claim against Sonstein, and therefore the depositions of these defendants and Kautzman were reasonable. There is, however, a split in the federal circuit courts as to whether or not *694 \u00a7 1988 permits a court to award expert witness fees in excess of the thirty dollar daily limit provided by 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1821(b). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has recently considered the different circuits holdings on this issue and concluded that under the Supreme Court case of Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., \"section 1988 as presently drafted does not authorize expert fee awards in excess of the statutory cap of thirty dollars per day provided in section 1821(b).\" West Virginia Univ. Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey, 885 F.2d 11, 35 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 1294, 108 L. Ed. 2d 472 (1990) (referring to Crawford Fitting, 482 U.S. 437, 107 S. Ct. 2494, 96 L. Ed. 2d 385 (1987)). In reaching its decision, however, the Third Circuit noted that: Justice Blackmun, concurring in Crawford Fitting, and Justices Marshall and Brennan, dissenting, all emphasized that the Court in that case did not reach the question whether a court may award excess expert witness fees under section 1988. Casey, 885 F.2d at 33 (citing Crawford Fitting, 482 U.S. at 445, 446 n. 1, 107 S. Ct. at 2499, 2500 n. 1). In addition, the Third Circuit also noted that: Indeed, a number of courts examining the question raised here have concluded that Crawford Fitting does not limit expert witness fee awards under section 1988 to the rate set in section 1821(b). 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 12/14 Id. at 34 (footnote omitted). The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, however, has evaluated the expert witness fee question in light of the Crawford Fitting decision, and has held that \u00a7 1821(b) does not limit the expert witness fees recoverable under \u00a7 1988 to thirty dollars a day. Friedrich v. City of Chicago, 888 F.2d 511 (7th Cir.1989), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 29, 1990) (No. 89-1230). The Seventh Circuit's decision in Friedrich essentially upheld an earlier decision where it held: that expenses of litigation that are distinct from either statutory costs or the costs of the lawyer's time reflected in his hourly billing rates expenses for such things as postage, long-distance calls, xeroxing, travel, paralegal, and expert witnesses are part of the reasonable attorney's fee allowed by the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act. Heiar v. Crawford County, Wis., 746 F.2d 1190, 1203 (7th Cir.1984) (emphasis added) (citing Henry v. Webermeier, 738 F.2d 188, 191-92 (7th Cir.1984)). In essence, the Seventh Circuit has avoided the fee limitations of \u00a7 1821(b) by considering expert witness fees to be part of the attorney's fee. Although there is a split in the circuits, the Seventh Circuit's Friedrich decision is controlling law in this circuit. Accordingly, this court holds that in a \u00a7 1988 attorney's fee award, \u00a7 1821(b) does not limit the expert witness fee to thirty dollars a day. This court, however, must also determine if the expert witness fees were related to King's successful claim against Sonstein and if they were reasonable. First, the expert witness fees were all paid to doctors whose testimony was related to the damage King suffered as a result of the defendants' actions, including Sonstein's sexual harassment. Thus, the expert testimony was related to King's successful claim. Second, this court has reviewed the fee charged by each expert witness and finds each to be reasonable. In addition, this court has reviewed the other expenses requested by King and finds that they also are reasonable and justifiably incurred. Thus, this court grants in full King's request for expenses totaling $8,687.20 that on or before forty-five (45) days from the date of this order, the defendants in this action shall pay to plaintiff Katherine King pursuant to Title 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 13/14 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1988 an attorney's fee award of $190,226.56 and costs associated with this award of $8,687.20 for a total payment of $198,913.76. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v WIS., 748 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Wis. 1990) :: Justia 14/14", "8443_103.pdf": "From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Mar 22, 1990 898 F.2d 533 (7th Cir. 1990) Copy Citation Download Check Treatment Rethink the way you litigate with CoCounsel for research, discovery, depositions, and so much more. Try CoCounsel free Nos. 88-3481, 88-3482, 89-1381 and 89-1477. Argued December 14, 1989. Decided March 22, 1990. As Amended March 22, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 23, 1990. *534 534 Walter Kelly, Sutton Kelly, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee, cross- appellant. Nadim Sahar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wisconsin Dept. of Justice, Michael D. Schuman, Sodos, Schuman Pieper, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants- Sign In Search all cases and statutes... Opinion Summaries Case details 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 1/17 FLAUM, Circuit Judge. appellants, cross-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Before and MANION, Circuit Judges. This is a sex discrimination case against the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee (UWM) and several of its employees filed by a tenure-track professor who was denied contract renewal. The suit was filed under both 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 and Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 jury issued a special verdict under \u00a7 1983, finding discrimination, harassment, and retaliation by three employees of and vicarious liability of UWM. The district court granted judgment n.o.v. for all the defendants except Stephen Sonstein, a tenured professor at UWM. The district court also made parallel findings on the Title claim. Sonstein appeals the verdict against him and King cross-appeals the judgments n.o.v. We affirm on all counts. I. Katherine King was hired in 1980 as an assistant professor of occupational therapy at the School of Allied Health Professions at UWM. Her appointment consisted of a three-year term, renewable for a second three- year term, renewable again for either a tenured career appointment or a one-year, terminal appointment. Her contract was renewed for the second three-year term, but a unanimous committee voted not to renew her contract for a seventh year. Subsequent to her non-renewal, King brought this suit alleging that during her employment at UWM, various members of the faculty sexually harassed or otherwise sexually discriminated against her and that is vicariously liable for their actions. Only the claims against two members of the faculty at UWM, Steven Sonstein and Franklin Stein, are appealed. Steven Sonstein served as Assistant Dean and tenured member of the faculty in the School of Allied Health Professions. During the fall term of 1980, Sonstein, acting as Assistant Dean, approached King and discussed with her various problems faced by new professors and various aspects of the 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 2/17 operation of the program. As the fall term of 1980 proceeded, King became concerned because Sonstein began making suggestive innuendos as well as leering at her in a sexually suggestive fashion. In October and November of 1980, Sonstein became progressively more bold and offensive with respect to his sexual *535 behavior toward King. He repeatedly leered at King and would from time to time touch her, rub up against her, place objects between her legs, make suggestive remarks and comment upon various parts of her body. Sonstein's behavior was blatant enough for other faculty members to notice and comment upon. King eventually requested that Sonstein stop treating her as he was, but he ignored these requests. 535 In late December of 1980, King attended the department's annual Christmas party. During the party, King went into the bathroom and Sonstein followed her in. He told King that he \"had to have her\" and that \"he would have her.\" King protested but Sonstein forcibly kissed and fondled her. Eventually, King's boyfriend entered the bathroom and Sonstein relented. After King left the party, Sonstein directed similar behavior towards other women, despite requests that he stop. After this incident, King discussed the problem with Sonstein and during the next year and three months he refrained from touching her. Then, in February, 1982, Sonstein falsely accused King of using UWM's photocopying equipment for personal use. This accusation was quite serious and was made shortly before King's contract renewal hearing. She was eventually cleared of the charges, and her contract was renewed. King, by then, had filed a sexual harassment charge against Sonstein with the office for Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. This charge was pursued until a settlement was reached. As part of the resolution of this charge, Sonstein abstained from voting on matters relating to King's appointment. King also made allegations against Professor Franklin Stein, the Director of the Occupational Therapy Program. The facts in this allegation, as in many claims of subtle discrimination, were much more nebulous. King argued that Stein subjected her to salary and workload disparities, unprecedented student evaluations, and poor appraisals. In addition, King argued that Stein mistreated her at faculty meetings, limited her research time, and wrongfully interfered in the tenure process. King supported these 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 3/17 allegations with a variety of incidents occurring over the six year period she was with UWM. For example, she argued that Stein attempted to limit her research time and increase her workload by trying to de-fund her \"grant buy-out\" time, which is research time created by receiving a grant to pay for a substitute to fulfill the teaching load. As a result of Stein's actions, King prepared a grievance to present to the departmental Executive Committee. Before submitting her grievance, King attempted to have Stein removed from the Committee that would hear the grievance. The Committee, however, refused to remove Stein until it could examine the nature and seriousness of the grievance. It did not, however, indicate that if the grievance was potentially serious, that Stein would not be removed from consideration of the grievance. Eventually the grievance was submitted to the University's Faculty Rights Responsibilities Committee which found that King failed to present sufficient evidence to establish a viable claim. King also alleged that Stein interfered with the contract renewal process. King had decided, for health reasons, that she did not wish to undergo renewal evaluations during her seventh year. She asked to go on a leave of absence with pay for the year and for a stay of the tenure clock. Stein refused on the basis that had never before granted leave with pay. He maintained that standard policy was only to allow leaves of absence without pay. King alleged that Stein's denial was motivated by sexual animus in that he could have created a special exception for her. She eventually refused to take the offered leave without pay, and thus came up for contract renewal. King's health problems prevented her from appearing at her scheduled consideration for renewal, so she submitted her candidacy on the basis of her record. Stein was chosen to present her materials in her absence because he was the person on the faculty most familiar with her work. King objected to his appointment as her presenter because she felt that he would sexually discriminate against her by not presenting her material in its best light. *536 536 When the decision came to vote on her contract renewal, Stein, along with a unanimous committee, voted not to renew her contract on the basis of lack of endeavor in the area of scholarly publications, lack of commitment in presenting theoretical, clinical or research papers, inability to make use of research time, and a lack of activity in professional associations. In short, 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 4/17 the Committee found that King had wholly failed to meet the expectations made of faculty members, whether it was because of discriminatory treatment or her own failings. As a result, her contract was not renewed. King raised a variety of legal claims based on these facts. She sued under both 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 and Title VII, claiming environmental sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, retaliation in the exercise of protected rights, and deprivation of a property interest without due process of law. These claims were made against Sonstein, Stein and two other members of the faculty. The case was tried to a jury on the section 1983 counts and simultaneously to the judge on the Title claims. The jury found, in a special verdict, that Sonstein subjected her to sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, and retaliation and that Stein subjected her to sexual discrimination, retaliation, and deprivation of a property interest without due process. In addition, it found liable for sexual discrimination, deprivation of a property interest without due process and failure to protect her from sexual discrimination, and it found two other members of the department liable for discrimination. The jury awarded $65,000 for past compensation and benefits, $150,000 for loss of future earning capacity, and $60,000 in pain and suffering, with these amounts not allocated among the individual defendants. In addition, the jury awarded punitive damages of $30,000 against Sonstein and $40,000 against Stein. The defendants moved for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative, a new trial. They claimed that there was no evidence of discrimination or retaliation in the record, no property interest in contract renewal, and no harassment based on sex. The district court largely agreed and granted the defendants' motion for judgment n.o.v. on all of the counts except the harassment claim against Sonstein. With respect to discrimination, the court held that King was not subject to salary or workload disparities, discriminatory treatment with respect to grant buy-out time, or discrimination in the tenure/contract renewal process. As to the retaliatory actions, the district court found that Sonstein did not partake in any vote or action taken against King, as per the agreement resulting from the charge, and that Stein's decision to vote against her contract renewal was motivated solely by her lack of professional 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 5/17 achievements. It also found that King had no property interest in the renewal of her contract, via Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). It dismissed her claims against the other two individuals, and found that the eleventh amendment immunized from suit under section 1983. Finally, the district court found that because King had been discharged for legitimate reasons and not for reasons relating to her sexual harassment claims, the jury's award for back pay and loss of future earnings were not substantiated. The damages were accordingly reduced to pain and suffering ($60,000) and punitive damages ($30,000) against Sonstein. Parallel findings were made under King's Title claim and no additional damages were awarded. II. On appeal, King alleges sexual discrimination based on disparate treatment, environmental sexual harassment, retaliation resulting from her complaints of this treatment, and deprivation of a property interest without due process. She makes these claims against both Stein and Sonstein under both Title and section 1983. As the applicable law for both Stein and Sonstein is largely the same, we begin with a review of the established law governing both these claims. *537 537 King's claims of workload and salary disparties, lack of guidance, and unequal treatment during the tenure/contract renewal process all fall under the disparate treatment analysis of Title VII. Title makes it illegal for employers \"to discriminate against any individual . . . because of such individual's . . . sex.\" 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e-2(a)(1). To be actionable, claims of disparate treatment must affect the terms or conditions of employment. Id. Proof of disparate treatment on the basis of sex is much the same as for race, see Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324, 97 S.Ct. 1843, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977), except that the employer may offer a bona fide occupational qualification for the disparate treatment. 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e-2(e)(1). The plaintiff may either offer direct proof of different treatment on the basis of sex, see Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d 268 (1989), or may use the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), burden-shifting method of proof. The issue 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 6/17 for review in this case is whether, under McDonnell Douglas, King established a prima facie case that she was subject to disparate treatment. King also claims she was subject to environmental sexual harassment, which is also recognized under Title VII. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986). The standard of proof for a claim of sexual harassment is somewhat different from the proof for disparate treatment. In these cases, a plaintiff establishes her claim by demonstrating that the employer \"has created a hostile or abusive working environment.\" Id. at 2405. Under this analysis, a loss of a tangible job benefit is not necessary since the harassment itself affects the terms or conditions of employment. Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934, 945 (D.C. Cir. 1981). The harassment, however, \"must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment.\" Vinson, 106 S.Ct. at 2405 (citations omitted). It must deny the plaintiff \"the right to participate in the work place on equal footing with others similarly situated.\" Scott v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 798 F.2d 210 (7th Cir. 1986). See also Bohen v. City of East Chicago, Ind., 799 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1986). Although a single act can be enough, Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1186-87, generally, repeated incidents create a stronger claim of hostile environment, with the strength of the claim depending on the number of incidents and the intensity of each incident. In applying this test, we look at the harassment from both the objective and subjective viewpoint of the plaintiff: in order to find discrimination, the court must conclude that \"the conduct would adversely affect both a reasonable person and the particular plaintiff bringing the action.\" Brooms v. Regal Tube Co., 881 F.2d 412 (7th Cir. 1989). Regardless of whether recovery is promised under environmental sexual harassment or disparate treatment, the damages are the same: the plaintiff may seek reinstatement, back pay, and attorney's fees. 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000e- 5(g). Compensatory, nominal, and punitive damages are not available under Title VII. Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1184. Under claims of harassment, there will often be no loss of tangible job benefits, so recovery of back pay is extremely limited. In fact, the district court in this case found that while King lost her job, she did not prove that harassment caused the loss and therefore did not award back pay to King. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 7/17 King also sued under section 1983, claiming that sexual harassment by Sonstein was a violation of the equal protection clause, under which she can recover compensatory and punitive damages. We have held that sexual harassment is a violation of equal protection, Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1185, although the precise parameters of this cause of action have not been well defined. In general, the claim follows the contours of Title claims. One difference between sexual harassment under equal protection and under Title VII, however, is that the defendant must intend to harass under equal protection, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 1719-21, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), but not under Title VII, where the inquiry is solely *538 from the plaintiff's perspective. Vinson, 106 S.Ct. at 2406; Brooms, 881 F.2d at 419. In the present case, the dispute centers around the issue of intent. To show intent for equal protection purposes, \"it is not necessary to show that all women employees were sexually harassed. Harassment of the plaintiff alone because of her sex is enough.\" Bohen, 799 F.2d at 1187. 538 Finally, King claims she was retaliated against for exercising her first amendment rights. All public employees have a right to engage in free speech and self-expression while participating in political and social affairs. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). If protected speech is a substantial factor in a negative employment action by a public employer, the employee may have a claim to reinstatement with backpay. Mt. Healthy City School Dist. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 568, 574- 77, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). To prevail King must, under Mt. Healthy, identify a negative employment decision, and prove that some protected speech was the cause of the decision. Id. III. Our standard of review for King's claims is well established. We review the district court's granting of a judgment n.o.v. de novo. Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896, 900 (7th Cir. 1984 motion for judgment n.o.v. should be denied where the evidence, along with all reasonable inferences, when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, is such that reasonable persons may reach different conclusions. Hohmann v. Packard Instrument Co., 471 F.2d 815, 819 (7th Cir. 1973). Judgment n.o.v. should be granted if the 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 8/17 evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion, that the moving party is entitled to judgment. A. Claims Against Sonstein The district court found that \"Sonstein sexually harassed King in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution [and his] actions created an abusive working environment for King in violation of Title VII.\" Certainly, it would appear from the facts that the district court's findings are amply supported. Sonstein repeatedly verbally assaulted King, fondled her, and at one point, physically attacked her. His advances were unwelcome and he was so told. The district court and the jury respectively found that these advances created an abusive working environment sufficient to alter the conditions of employment in violation of Title and equal protection. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to King, it is difficult to imagine that a reasonable person, along with this particular plaintiff, would not be adversely affected. Sonstein advances only one argument in his defense and only defends the equal protection claim. It is an argument which we believe to be profoundly flawed. He claims that his actions were merely the result of his desire for King as an individual and, therefore, were not sex-based harassment. To support this claim he cites Huebschen v. Dept. of Health and Social Sciences, 716 F.2d 1167, 1171 (7th Cir. 1983). In Huebschen we held that sexual harassment was actionable under the equal protection clause. In applying the law to the facts of the case, we found that the claim of sexual discrimination had not been proven because the plaintiff was merely a \"jilted lover;\" the defendant, a female supervisor, harassed the plaintiff not because he was a male but because he had spurned her. On this basis, we held that the defendant's actions were the result of a personal vendetta and not sexually discriminatory. Sonstein divides his argument applying Huebschen into two parts. First he claims that King was not a member of a protected class since she was simply a member of the class of people whom Sonstein desired to have an affair with. But King was and remains a woman. That is all that is required. Volk, 845 F.2d at 1433. Second, Sonstein argues that he lacked \"hatred of the protected class.\" While violation of the equal protection clause requires 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 9/17 discriminatory intent, we *539 can find no \"hatred\" requirement in either the fourteenth amendment itself or the case law. In fact, the opposite may very well be true: a desire to protect women because of paternalism and admiration may be the cause of discriminatory action. For example, state protective laws have been invalidated on Title grounds, Williams v. General Foods Corp., 492 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1974), as have laws that require women to take maternity leave. Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 94 S.Ct. 791, 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). Similarly, pension systems that presumably benefit women have been invalidated. City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 98 S.Ct. 1370, 55 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978). None of these discriminatory actions evidence a hatred or even a dislike of women. All that is required is that the action taken be motivated by the gender of the plaintiff. No hatred, no animus, and no dislike is required. 539 Nevertheless, Sonstein's arguments may still have some force. The theme of Huebschen is that disparate or harassing treatment is not sexually discriminatory if there is a cause other than gender. If, as a purely personal matter, a boss and a particular employee are not compatible, it would not be sexually discriminatory to harass the employee on that basis. We echoed this theme in Bohen where we stated that \"it is a good defense, however, if the employer can show that the harassment suffered by the plaintiff was directed at the plaintiff because of factors personal to her and not because she is a woman.\" 779 F.2d at 1187 (citing Huebschen). This logic clearly retains vitality: the equal protection clause does not prohibit all negative employment actions against women. Sonstein's argument, therefore, comes down to the assertion that harassment (Sonstein's argument does not address whether the conduct is harassing) based on sexual desire is not based on gender. One argument that Sonstein might advance to this end is that his sexual desire indicates that he did not have a policy of discrimination against womanhood as a whole; it was just King's particular sexual characteristics. We rejected this argument in Bohen where we stated \"an equal protection plaintiff therefore need not prove a discriminatory policy against an entire class; discrimination against the plaintiff because of her membership in the class is by itself enough.\" 799 F.2d at 1187 (citations omitted). See also Volk v. Coler, 845 F.2d 1422, 1433 (7th 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 10/17 Cir. 1988) (plaintiff \"need not prove that an entire class was discriminated against\"). Another argument to support Sonstein's position might be that his desire for a sexual affair was based on her characteristics other than sex, similar to the defendant in Huebschen who disliked the plaintiff as a person. To this end, Sonstein claims it was King as an individual to whom he was attracted, not King as a woman. This argument, however, also misses the point. Sonstein wanted to have an affair, a liaison, illicit sex, a forbidden relationship. His actions are not consistent with platonic love. His actions were based on her gender and motivated by his libido. We have, in fact, previously rejected this very argument in the context of quid pro quo harassment. In quid pro quo cases, a supervisor demands sexual favors from an employee as a condition of employment. This is exactly the situation where a supervisor's only motivation is to have a conjugal relationship with the employee. In Horn v. Duke we considered the argument that the quid pro quo demands based on sexual desire were not based on sex. 755 F.2d 599, 604 (7th Cir. 1985). We found that \"[b]ut for Horn's womanhood, Has would not have demanded sex as a condition of employment. Because of her sex, therefore, Horn was disadvantaged by pressure to submit to an additional, humiliating condition of employment that served no legitimate purpose of the employer.\" Id. In other words, treatment of individual based on sexual desire is sexually motivated. Sonstein's sexual desire does not negate his intent; rather it affirmatively establishes it. Yet a final argument that Sonstein might advance is that because his actions were motivated by her sex, he did not intend to harass her. It is clear, however, that the advances were unwelcome and that Sonstein *540 knew they were unwelcome. This is not the case of a single, innocent, sexual query. Instead, we have repeated, unwelcome advances, fondling and a physical attack. The jury was justified in inferring intent to harass from these facts, and we affirm the verdict of sexual harassment against Sonstein. 540 To recover the $65,000 in past benefits and $150,000 in loss of future earnings, King makes two additional legal claims against Sonstein: 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 11/17 retaliation for the exercise of her first amendment rights and discriminatory treatment. We agree with the district court that the facts do not support her claims. Sonstein was unable to deny her past benefits or future earnings because he refrained from participating in decisions regarding her job due to her complaint with the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity. The only retaliatory or discriminatory action that King uses to support her case (or at least that we can discern from her rather opaque brief) is that Sonstein falsely accused her of using the photocopy machine for personal use. This incident does not support King's claim of retaliation because the accusation was made before King exercised her first amendment rights and therefore cannot be said to have been done in retaliation. And if it was discrimination, King did not prove she lost a job benefit, such as past benefits or future earnings, as a result of this incident \u2014 her contract was renewed soon after the accusation. She therefore fails to prove that she is entitled to any damages under these claims. King attempts to bolster her arguments by maintaining that harassment, discriminatory treatment, and retaliation caused her to be permanently psychologically disabled, thereby preventing her from fulfilling the tenure requirements or obtaining another job elsewhere in academics. In Williamson v. Handy Button Machine Co., 817 F.2d 1290, 1294-95 (7th Cir. 1987), we verified that damages are available for inability to work due to psychological problems resulting from discrimination. Nevertheless, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to King, we conclude that she has failed to prove that harassment, retaliation and discrimination caused her failure to meet the requirements for contract renewal. She offered no evidence that she had performed tenure-quality work prior to the discriminatory treatment or of her ability to perform adequately outside of the allegedly sexually harassing environment. In addition, King was provided with ample time away from during the summer to perform some research or engage in some professional activity. Yet, King failed to present any materials to the committee indicating any effort on her part to undertake such actions. We conclude, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to King, that King failed to prove retaliation or discrimination by Sonstein. Therefore, we affirm the district court's grant of judgment n.o.v. to the defendants on these counts. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 12/17 B. Claims Against Stein King raised claims against Stein for discrimination and retaliation, under both Title and the equal protection clause, as well as deprivation of property without due process. As stated above, to prove retaliation, King must prove that exercise of her first amendment rights was a substantial factor in the adverse action. Mt. Healthy, 97 S.Ct. at 577. Nothing in the record, however, suggests that King was qualified for tenure renewal unanimous committee voted not to renew her contract on the basis of lack of endeavor in the area of scholarly publications, lack of commitment in presenting theoretical, clinical, or research papers, inability to make use of research time, and a lack of activity in professional associations. King offered nothing into evidence to negate the committee's findings or to prove that the committee did not correctly apply its contract renewal criteria. As a result, King has failed to prove that her exercise of first amendment rights was a substantial factor in Stein's vote not to renew her contract. Her discrimination claim fairs no better. The record reflects that King was not subject to salary and workload disparities. At no time during any academic year, or even *541 any semester, did King ever carry the heaviest teaching load. In fact, for the entire 1983-84 school year, King had the lightest load. There is also no evidence that she had a heavier load than was required of men in the department. Moreover, her salary was not different from other faculty members. She was hired in 1980 at a salary of $17,000. The next year her salary was increased to $18,985 and a man named McPherson, was hired by the department for a comparable position at $18,000. Each year she taught, her salary was increased and throughout that time, McPherson's salary was lower than her salary. In addition, there is no evidence, other than her bald assertion, that her salary was not comparable to the salaries of male faculty other than McPherson. 541 We are more troubled by the other, more nebulous incidents which King claims are sexually discriminatory, namely Stein's supposed limiting of her research time and mistreatment during the tenure process. It is difficult to tell from a cold record what the motivations were for a particular action, say, for example, Stein's decision to act as her presenter at the contract renewal hearing, or for example, the alleged attempts to limit her grant-buy-out 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 13/17 time. For this reason, we defer to the jury and the district court for these types of findings. It is clear in this case, however, that no term, condition or privilege of employment was affected as a result of these actions. She had more time and funding for research than did any other faculty member in her program and there is no indication that additional research time would have brought her close to the contract renewal requirements. Similarly, it is clear that her problems with non-renewal went much deeper than merely who presented her to the committee; she wholly failed to meet the renewal requirements. To establish a prima facie case under McDonnell Douglas, she must prove that she was subject to treatment different from other members of the department that affected a term or condition of employment. She has not met this burden; her contract renewal chances were not diminished by Stein. King also claims that Stein deprived her of a property right without due process of law. She makes two due process arguments. First, she claims that and Stein did not provide her with a forum to secure redress for discrimination. She cites, Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 102 S.Ct. 1148, 1157, 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982), for the proposition that a state- created inability to present claims of entitlement violate due process. Logan, however, is inapposite because here the state has not precluded her from bringing a claim securing her state-guaranteed rights. The rights she claims she could not enforce were not state-created property interests. They are federal statutory and constitutional claims. In addition, at all times during King's appointment had an operating office through which to pursue her claims. In fact, she maintained an action against Sonstein through that office which resulted in a favorable settlement. And if she were unsuccessful there, she was not precluded from bringing a claim in state court. King also argues that she was deprived of a property interest without due process during her contract renewal proceedings. This claim, however, is precluded by Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 578, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). In Roth, the Court held that an assistant professor terminated after one year had no property interest in his continued employment where his unilateral expectations had no basis in statute, contract, or mutually explicit understanding. King's appointment only lasted 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 14/17 [38] MANION, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. through her sixth year. She had no property interest in renewal. In addition, it is clear that there was no explicit mutual understanding: King's letter granting her re-appointment in her third year stated that the appointment was as a probationary faculty member. Without more evidence of a property interest, King's claim fails. Finally, the district court granted Stein's motion for judgment n.o.v. regarding the punitive damages against Stein. Because we have affirmed the district court's grant *542 of judgment n.o.v. against Stein on all the substantive counts, the punitive damage claim also fails. 542 IV. The judgments of the district court are concur in the majority's opinion to the extent it holds defendants free of liability. However disagree with the majority's conclusion that Steven Sonstein violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when he sexually harassed Catherine King. In the fall of 1980, King was serving her first term as a faculty member. She described Sonstein as being very helpful and \"appreciated Dean Sonstein's advice because she believed he was acting in good faith and he was the only supervisory level professor who took the time to talk with her.\" However, by November the conversations turned from helpful hints to sexual overtures. Between November and January there were several unwelcome advances, one of which was intolerable. In January, in a straightforward meeting with Sonstein, King set him straight, and demanded that such conduct cease. After that, for the most part Sonstein's overtures, inept, boorish, or uncouth as they may have been, ended year or so later King accused Sonstein of retaliating against her when he claimed she was using the copy machine for personal matters, but that was resolved with an administrative settlement. The pivotal question is whether the apparent hostile atmosphere resulted from Sonstein's discriminatory treatment of King based on her membership in a class \u2014 female, as in Bohen v. City of East Chicago, 799 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 15/17 1986) \u2014 or whether it was confined to a \"group\" of persons (King) with whom Sonstein had sought to have a romantic affair as in Huebschen v. Dept. of Health and Social Services, 716 F.2d 1167 (7th Cir. 1983). The majority states that Sonstein \"claims that King was not a member of a protected class as she was simply a member of the class of people whom Sonstein desired to have an affair with. But King was and remains a woman. That is all that is required.\" Majority opinion at 538. The majority cites Volk v. Coler, 845 F.2d 1422 (7th Cir. 1988). But neither Volk nor Bohen says that being a woman is all that is required. Rather, these cases require harassment of the individual plaintiff because of her gender. It does not appear that Sonstein harassed King because, for example, he did not like having women in the department. Rather, he harassed King because he was physically attracted to her albeit because she was, in his mind, an attractive woman. Huebschen held that \"the proper classification, if there was one at all, was the group of persons with whom [defendant] had or sought to have a romantic affair. . . . [W]e simply are not persuaded that the Equal Protection Clause should protect such a class.\" Huebschen, 716 F.2d at 1172. Although there is some evidence that Sonstein made snide remarks and some minor overtures to other women faculty, Sonstein put King in a class by herself as his romantic target. The only way Huebschen would not apply is if we were to say that the classification of the target of a romantic affair applies only to men and not to women. Obviously such is not the case. Sonstein's boorish advances were confined to King on account of his attraction to her personal qualities. Sonstein harassed Katherine King because she was Katherine King, not because she was female. \"In an Equal Protection claim, the petitioner faces the tougher standard of proving purposeful and intentional acts of discrimination based on her membership in a particular class, not just on an individual basis.\" Forrester v. White, 846 F.2d 29, 32 (7th Cir. 1988). Such activity may be actionable, but not as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Because believe Huebschen controls the disposition of the claim against Sonstein respectfully dissent. *543 543 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 16/17 About us Jobs News Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Help articles Customer support Contact sales Cookie Settings Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information Privacy Terms \u00a9 2024 Casetext Inc. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 2/22/25, 10:43 King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System, 898 F.2d 533 | Casetext Search + Citator 17/17"} |
8,578 | Steven Mock | University of Texas – Austin | [
"8578_101.pdf"
] | {"8578_101.pdf": "Steven E. Mock Associate Professor Cross-appointed to School of Public Health Sciences Contact information Phone: 519-888-4567, ext. 48796 Email: [email protected] Office: B.C. Matthews Hall (BMH) 2310 Website Retirement Research Centre < 2/22/25, 10:43 Steven E. Mock | Recreation and Leisure Studies | University of Waterloo 1/4 Research interests am a developmental psychologist with research interests in the areas of aging and retirement, coping with stigmatization, sexual minority adult development, and leisure as a coping resource. My research has been funded by and the Retirement Research Centre am also the recipient of an Early Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation to support research on retirement planning among diverse family forms. Graduate supervision and student opportunities am currently accepting applications from graduate students with research interests related to: Adult development and aging Coping Sexual orientation Motivation Graduate studies application details < Teaching interests Psychological approaches to leisure research Adult development and aging Well-being Quantitative analysis View on YouTube 2/22/25, 10:43 Steven E. Mock | Recreation and Leisure Studies | University of Waterloo 2/4 Courses 401: Advanced Seminar on the Socio-Cultural and Behavioural Dimensions of Leisure 405: Leisure and Well-being 672/772: Quantitative Research Data Analysis and Interpretation Education BA, Univeristy of Waterloo MA, Cornell Univeristy PhD, Cornell University Selected publications See Google Scholar for full list of publications. Schryer, E., Mock, S. E., Hilbrecht, M., Lero, D., & Smale, B. (2016). Use of leisure facilities and well-being in adult caregivers. Leisure Sciences, 38, 17-33. Mock, S. E., Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2013). Deeper leisure involvement as a coping resource in a stigmatized leisure context. Leisure/Loisir, 37, 111-126. Mock, S. E., & Eibach, R. P. (2012). Stability and change in sexual orientation identity over a 10-year period in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 641-648. Mock, S. E., & Eibach, R. P. (2011). Age prejudice moderates the effect of subjective age on psychological well-being: Evidence from a 10-year longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 26, 979-986. Faculty, Leisure faculty, Researchers, Leisure, health and well-being researcher, Leisure and social justice researcher < < < < < The Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies is a division of the Faculty of Health < Contact Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies </recreation-and-leisure-studies/node/156> Support Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies </recreation-and-leisure-studies/node/57> Map and directions </recreation-and-leisure-studies/node/58> Employment opportunities < Provide website feedback 2/22/25, 10:43 Steven E. Mock | Recreation and Leisure Studies | University of Waterloo 3/4 <htt ps:/ /uw ate rloo .ca/ ma p/> 200 University Avenue West Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 +1 519 888 4567 Contact Waterloo < Accessibility < News < Maps & directions < directions> Privacy < Careers < Emergency notifications < notifications/> Copyright < Feedback < The University of Waterloo acknowledges that much of our work takes place on the traditional territory of the Neutral, Anishinaabeg, and Haudenosaunee peoples. Our main campus is situated on the Haldimand Tract, the land granted to the Six Nations that includes six miles on each side of the Grand River. Our active work toward reconciliation takes place across our campuses through research, learning, teaching, and community building, and is co-ordinated within the Office of Indigenous Relations < < < < < < @uwaterloo social directory < \u00a92025 All rights reserved IT. Learn how \u2192 < 2/22/25, 10:43 Steven E. Mock | Recreation and Leisure Studies | University of Waterloo 4/4"} |
7,595 | Dennis E. Hensley | Taylor University | [
"7595_101.pdf"
] | {"7595_101.pdf": "Home > News > Religion Sexual Harassment Uncovered at Christian Writing Conferences By Ann Byle | Sep 12, 2018 Women within the Christian writing and publishing industry are coming forward with allegations and complaints of sexual misconduct ranging from \u201caccidental\u201d touching to being pinned against walls and fondled, from invasive \u201cmentoring\u201d relationships to requests for sexual favors at writers conferences. These accusations follow the #MeToo movement that brought widespread sexual misconduct allegations to light over the past year, as well as the more recent #ChurchToo movement, in which several church leaders\u2019 sexual indiscretions surfaced. The list of men in Christian publishing circles who have recently been accused of sexual misconduct, ranging from inappropriate comments to unwanted touching, include publishing professional Dennis Hensley, literary agent Chip MacGregor, magazine editor Ben Wolf, and writing mentor Jeff Gerke. Numerous allegations surfaced in late 2017 as Christian writers conference directors began talking to one another via a private Facebook group about attendees\u2019 reports of unwanted sexual advances. By January 2018, patterns of inappropriate and abusive behavior, as well as names, emerged\u2014and directors are taking action. The tipping point for many accusers was the resignation of Dennis Hensley from Taylor University in Upland, Ind., in July amid allegations of sexual impropriety. Hensley, who was a familiar face at Christian writers conferences and directed Taylor\u2019s Professional Writing program, stepped down prior to the conclusion of an investigation into what the university called \u201csignificant and credible allegations of serious misconduct.\u201d Jim Watkins, a friend of Hensley and former director of the St. David\u2019s Christian Writers Conference, investigated sexual harassment claims against Hensley with help from others and took those findings to Taylor University, prompting the school to take action have... personally talked with many of his victims including a student and many at writers\u2019 conferences. My heart breaks for these women and the serious sexual misconduct they have endured,\u201d Watkins wrote in a statement posted on his website. In an article in Fort Wayne\u2019s Journal Gazette on July 13, Hensley is quoted as saying thought should take the high road and retire... and just call it quits and let this thing die its own death.\u201d One of Hensley\u2019s early accusers, former Taylor University student Rachel Custer, described to a 2004 event involving inappropriate hugging and attempts by Hensley to kiss her, saying they would be \u201cspecial friends\u201d and this would be their \u201clittle secret.\u201d She immediately reported the incident to the Taylor dean of students. To her knowledge, a letter was placed in his file regarding the incident. In response, according to an article in the Chronicle Tribune, Hensley said, \u201cWhen she reported it, the way she remembered it was totally exaggerated.\u201d Also among the accusers willing to go on record is Brenda Wilbee, author of 10 books including the Seattle Sweetbriar Series (Revell), who recalled an incident in 1983 at the Seattle Pacific University Writers Conference. She picked Hensley up at the airport, and he invited her to his room to continue their conversation about the Christian publishing business. He sprawled on the couch, according to Wilbee, promising to get her on the conference circuit if she \u201cagreed to a rendezvous with him,\u201d she said. \u201cWithout him had no hope of succeeding. It was all about who you knew and he knew everybody. The threat was clear said no.\u201d Wilbee said Hensley begged her for sex, tried to block her escape, and followed her to her car, where he tried again to kiss her. The attack ended when she honked the horn, and then he blamed her for \u201cwearing a pretty dress.\u201d Hensley was contacted by and, on the advice of counsel, chose not to respond to any questions. Writers conferences and email exchanges were the venue for several women\u2019s allegations of harassment by literary agent Chip MacGregor. However, out of fear for their careers, many of PW\u2019s sources refused to go on record with their accounts, which included inappropriate touching, lewd comments, and suggestive emails. Lorilee Craker, a former client of MacGregor\u2019s and author of 15 books, including Money Secrets of the Amish (Thomas Nelson), ran into a wall when she brought up sexual misconduct stories to other industry professionals regarding inappropriate behavior and comments that occurred over the course of many years, starting in the mid-2000s. \u201cOn the rare occasions when would tell people in the industry about my experience with Chip, they would invariably shut me down,\u201d she said. \u201c \u2018Oh don\u2019t want you to get a reputation for talking out of turn\u2019\u2014a silencing line if there ever was one. The message was that \u2018gossip\u2019 was a worse crime than anything else.\u201d MacGregor, who lives in Oregon, spoke to about the allegations had acted like a jerk and been inappropriate on numerous occasions\u2026 I\u2019ve never attacked or harassed anyone, but my behavior was inexcusable, and I\u2019m sorry.\u201d He said that \u201cany sexual activity was, in fact, consensual \u2014but looking back on that time, I\u2019m ashamed of who was and how acted.\u201d Ben Wolf, editor-in-chief of Splickety Publishing Group (SPG), who has made the rounds of Christian writers conferences, has also come under scrutiny for allegations of sexual impropriety that include inappropriate emails and conversations as well as requests for sex. Wolf responded to the allegations in a statement to PW: \u201cIn the summer of 2017 made inappropriate comments to a female peer in the publishing industry who had routinely exchanged similar inappropriate jokes back and forth with me for several years prior immediately apologized to all affected parties as soon as concerns regarding my words were brought to my attention, and regret that any of it ever happened. This incident is the only one of its kind, and will never repeat this mistake. \u201cAny other allegations leveled against me regarding supposed misconduct, harassment, bullying, and/or manipulation and the like are blatantly false, and categorically deny them.\u201d Writing mentor and teacher Jeff Gerke has been removed from speaker lists amid allegations of sexually inappropriate behavior. Gerke, who started Marcher Lord Press, a Christian sci-fi/fantasy publisher (it has since changed hands and become Enclave Publishing), faces allegations of inappropriate emails, requests for sex, and sending suggestive photos. When asked by about allegations of inappropriate behavior at certain faith-based writers conferences, Gerke admitted to one \u201cemotional affair.\u201d: \u201cBecause the emotional affair was consensual (and initiated by the other woman), I\u2019m surprised to see it depicted as sexual harassment. She was as fully engaged in it and as culpable as am.\u201d Nevertheless, he added, \u201cOver the past few years have sought out and received intensive Christian therapy, deep retraining of my thinking and behaving, and excellent marital counseling with my wife am deeply sorrowful for my actions.\u201d Due to the rising number of sexual harassment accounts, conference directors are taking steps to safeguard attendees. Many conference directors, including those at the Florida CWC, SoCal Christian Writers Conference, and Mount Hermon Christian Writers Conference, have created a code of conduct for faculty members, spelling out appropriate behaviors at conferences. While it is often impossible to definitively prove allegations of sexual harassment, the accusations are being taken seriously by conference directors. Some directors encourage or require speakers to have roommates to allow for accountability. Faculty members are encouraged or required to eat conference meals with the group rather than leaving the grounds. Directors are also encouraging conferees and speakers to come to them if anything happens that makes them feel uncomfortable. \u201cWe\u2019re not turning a blind eye anymore,\u201d Florida Christian Writers Conference director Eva Marie Everson said. Kathy Ide, director of the SoCal and Mount Hermon CWC, is encouraging male and female speakers and attendees to schedule one-on-one meetings in public settings rather than alone in a separate rooms, to never accept rides with anyone they don\u2019t know well, and to stay on conference grounds except during conference-planned group activities. Ide and other directors have started talking directly to conferees and speakers about appropriate behavior, as well as emailing the code of conduct to faculty. According to directors interviewed by PW, sexual harassment at Christian writing conferences is generally considered uncommon, but more stories are coming to light and better responsiveness is needed. \u201cThe most important thing for directors now is to just be aware,\u201d Everson of the Florida said. Keep your eyes open, and don\u2019t think that it can\u2019t happen at your conference. Because it can, and it could be the last person you expect.\u201d Correction previous version of this article stated that Watkins investigated Hensley on behalf of Taylor University. He did not The Great Winter 2025 Book Preview 8 Books That Should Be On Your Radar in 2025 PW\u2019s Best Books 2024 News Obituaries Book Deals Financial Reporting Page to Screen Bookselling Publisher News Awards & Prizes Comics Business Deals Shows & Events Cooking People Religion Audio Books Manufacturing Marketing Picks Licensing U.S. Book Show Reviews Fiction Mystery/Thriller Sci- Fi/Fantasy/Horror Romance/Erotica Comics Poetry Inspirational Fiction Nonfiction Lifestyle Religion Children's Web Exclusive BookLife Bestsellers Children's Frontlist Fiction Children's Picture Books Hardcover Frontlist Fiction Hardcover Frontlist Nonfiction Top 10 Overall Trade Paper Frontlist Children's Authors Book News Industry News Authors Profiles Interviews Why Write BookLife Previews Adult Previews Children's Previews Religion Listings On-Sale Calendar Galley Talk Digital Devices Copyright Retailing Conferences Content / e-books Apps Digital Marketplace The Roundup International Deals News Trade Shows Frankfurt Book Fair London Book Fair Sharjah Book Fair China Showcase Translation Database Job Zone Job Moves About Us | Contact Us | Submission Guidelines | Subscriber Services | Advertising Info | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell | Calls for Info | Editorial Calendar | Archives | Press | \u00a9 PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved and the Logo are trademarks of PWxyz, LLC. 7 Books from 2024 You Shouldn\u2019t Overlook Find Us Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn LinkedIn Religion & Spirituality LinkedIn School Librarian"} |
7,341 | Muata Weusi-Puryear | Foothill-De Anza Community College | [
"7341_101.pdf"
] | {"7341_101.pdf": "Oct 5, 1995 / $150,000 Settlement In Harass Case Los Altos Hills -- The Foothill-De Anza Community College District has agreed to pay three former students a total of $150,000 to settle a sexual harassment case against a professor. Newsletters 2/22/25, 10:44 / $150,000 Settlement In Harass Case 1/3 Oct 5, 1995 The three women accused math professor Muata Weusi-Puryear of making lewd remarks about them in class, making sexual advances and promising academic favors for sex, and they claimed the university did not do enough to stop him. The college district settled the case to avoid a costly trial, De Anza attorney John Shupe said. It maintained that Weusi-Puryear acted outside the scope of his employment, and that his behavior was not condoned by the college Article continues below this ad All of the women claimed that after they complained to a counselor, nothing was initially done. It was not until they contacted Weusi-Puryear's supervisors and an investigation was done that he was suspended without pay. Let's Play 2/22/25, 10:44 / $150,000 Settlement In Harass Case 2/3 Typeshift Really Bad Chess Flipart Cross|word About Contact Services Quick Links \u00a9 2025 Hearst Communications, Inc. Terms of Use Privacy Notice Notice at Collection Your Privacy Rights (Shine the Light Industry Opt Out Your Privacy Choices (Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads) Top 2/22/25, 10:44 / $150,000 Settlement In Harass Case 3/3"} |
7,716 | Nadeem Naqvi | University of Georgia | [
"7716_101.pdf"
] | {"7716_101.pdf": "Nadeem Naqvi Nadeem Naqvi Academic career Field development economics Institutions School or tradition New Keynesian economics Alma mater Delhi School of Economics, Central Michigan University Influences John Maynard Keynes Nadeem Naqvi Dr. Naqvi is an economist, professor and researcher in fields of development economics, theories of value and theory of individual choice and social welfare. In the past he was a lecturer and economics theory researcher at AUBG, Justus Liebig University, Central Michigan University and Middle Tennessee State University.[1] Amongst other research publications, Dr Naqvi is notable for his contribution in developing general equilibrium model for Lesotho.[2] As of 2015 Dr Naqvi is lecturing at University.[3] Dr Naqvi began his academic career in 1984. His first publication was on an inter-temporal theory of investment and international trade. His most cited works include research publications on unemployment, development economics, interest rates and the pure theory of international trade.[4] Dr Naqvi worked together with Dr. Keenan and Pech on Dynamic Tariff and Quota Retaliation in Markov Perfect Equilibrium. Dr Naqvi has academic interests in healthcare delivery evaluation, social identity diversification and social class disparities.[5] In 1981 Nadeem Naqvi received Bachelors in Economics at Delhi School of Economics. In 1984 Naqvi received PhD in Southern Methodist University. Upon graduation Dr Naqvi continued an academic career. From 1984 till 1987 he worked as an assistant professor at Central Michigan University. From 1987 till 1999 he worked as an assistant professor at the University of Georgia; he was dismissed for sexual misconduct.[6][7] From 1999 till 2000 he consulted the World Bank in Johannesburg on economic Research and publications Background 2/22/25, 10:44 Nadeem Naqvi - Wikipedia 1/3 development theories for several Sub-Saharan countries, including Lesotho and South African Republic.[8] After the World Bank, Dr Naqvi pursued an academic career as a full-time professor in United States and Bulgaria, Germany and Kazakhstan. As of 2015 during his tenure in Kazakhstan Dr Naqvi is carrying out research on post-crises structural transformations of the economies significantly dependent on exports of petroleum and natural gas.[9] In 2015 Dr. Naqvi received an award by PIE, a student organization at University, as the Best professor of the year.[10] 1. Naqvi, Nadeem, and Klaus Wiener. \"External increasing returns and the shadow price of foreign exchange.\" Journal of International economics 30.1 (1991): 177-184. 2. Deme, Mamit, David Franck, and Nadeem Naqvi General Equilibrium Skill Acquisitions Model of Development for Lesotho.\" Journal of Economic Development 30.1 (2005): 15. 3 University Faculty | Nadeem Naqvi\" ( aqvi/). Retrieved 3 April 2015. 4. Berdellima, Arian & Naqvi, Nadeem, 2012. \"Social diversification, injustices, and Pareto optimality with non-binary preferences Paper 39201, University Library of Munich, Germany. 5. Beladi, Hamid, and Nadeem Naqvi. \"Urban unemployment and non-immiserizing growth.\" Journal of Development Economics 28.3 (1988): 365-376. 6. Libarkin, J. (2019). Academic Sexual Misconduct Database. Available from sexual-misconduct-database.org 7 GEORGIA, August 1999, 8. Mamit Deme & David Franck & Nadeem Naqvi, 2005 General Equilibrium Skill Acquisitions Model Of Development For Lesotho,\" Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 15-29, June. 9. Lillis, Joanna (27 October 2014). \"Kazakhstan: Can Astana Survive an Oil Price Slump?\" ( ww.eurasianet.org/node/70616). Eurasianet. Retrieved 3 April 2015. 10. \"College of Social Sciences | Professor Nadeem Naqvi from the Department of Economics received the award for the Best Professor of the year\" ( 15/04/17/professor-nadeem-naqvi-from-the-department-of-economics-received-the-kimep-pie-awa rd-for-the-best-professor-of-the-year/). Retrieved 6 June 2015. Publications (Google Scholar) ( &pagesize=100&view_op=list_works) Publications (IDEAS) ( Publications (EconPapers) ( Kazakhstan Economy Roundtable of Experts ( References External links 2/22/25, 10:44 Nadeem Naqvi - Wikipedia 2/3 Retrieved from \" 2/22/25, 10:44 Nadeem Naqvi - Wikipedia 3/3"} |
7,791 | Cristobal Valencia | University of New Mexico | [
"7791_101.pdf",
"7791_102.pdf"
] | {"7791_101.pdf": "suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment The Associated Press Published 6:01 p.m Aug. 9, 2016 \u2014 The University of New Mexico has again suspended an assistant professor of anthropology. Officials announced Tuesday that the school has received new information that has led to an emergency suspension of Dr. Cristobal Valencia. Effective immediately, Valencia is suspended from all academic duties associated with his faculty appointment including teaching, research and service officials didn't specifically say why Valencia is being suspended again. But Albuquerque station reports that Valencia was suspended last spring for allegedly sexually harassing female students. He was reinstated to teach this semester and that reportedly outraged some of his alleged victims officials say Valencia's latest suspension will remain in place while new allegations against him are investigated or until the case is resolved. 2/22/25, 10:45 suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment 1/1", "7791_102.pdf": "ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) \u2014 The University of New Mexico has again suspended an assistant professor of anthropology. Officials announced Tuesday that the school has received new information that has led to an emergency suspension of Dr. Cristobal Valencia. Effective immediately, Valencia is suspended from all academic duties associated with his faculty appointment including teaching, research and service officials didn\u2019t specifically say why Valencia is being suspended again. But Albuquerque station reports that Valencia was suspended last spring for allegedly sexually harassing female students. He was reinstated to teach this semester and that reportedly outraged some of his alleged victims officials say Valencia\u2019s latest suspension will remain in place while new allegations against him are investigated or until the case is resolved suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment Published 5:32 CST, August 9, 2016 2/22/25, 10:45 suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment News 1/3 Trump fires Joint Chiefs of Staff chair Brown and 2 other military officers Judge largely blocks Trump\u2019s executive orders ending federal support for programs Trump says he may take control of the Postal Service. Here\u2019s what to know Steve Bannon is accused of doing a straight-arm Nazi salute at but says it was just \u2018a wave 1 2 3 4 2/22/25, 10:45 suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment News 2/3 Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio arrested near Capitol on assault charge after press conference 5 2/22/25, 10:45 suspends prof previously accused of sexual harassment News 3/3"} |
7,222 | Gregory Russell | Arkansas State University | [
"7222_101.pdf",
"7222_102.pdf",
"7222_103.pdf",
"7222_104.pdf"
] | {"7222_101.pdf": "( 1530 \u2013 3012) From the editor The System-Wide Effects of Capital Punishment on the American Criminal Justice System: The Use of Computer Modeling in Death About Reports & Publications News & Media Contact Justice Policy Journal \u2014 Volume 3, Number 2 \u2014 Fall 2006 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 1/14 Penalty Research Improving Compliance and Producing Positive Outcomes in the Mental Health Court Setting, with a Brief Look at Dynamic Risk Management Degradation, Apathy, and Acceptable Casualties: Serving Time in a Women\u2019s Federal Correctional Institute Adolescent Risk-Taking as a Justification for Paternalistic Legal Policy Accreditation and Community Policing: Are They Neutral, Hostile, or Synergistic? An Empirical Test among Street Cops and Management Cops \u201cSmart\u201d Policy Decisions to Combat a Social Problem: The Case of Child Abductions 2002 \u2013 2003 From the editor By Randall G. Shelden, M.A., Ph.D. From the Editor am pleased to present to the readers of this web site the fourth consecutive issue of this journal. This issue, Volume 3, Number 2, is especially significant, as we have a total of six fine articles covering a variety of unique topics believe readers will find that we are, as promised, becoming a leading on-line journal in the field of criminology. The lead article represents what consider to be a first in criminology: a female ex-convict who is now a professor at Indiana University- Southeast. Here we have a first-hand account of life inside a women\u2019s prison. Bernadette Olson writes about the often painful journey through a federal penitentiary and shares not only insights into her own struggles Aug 22, 2007 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 2/14 but the struggles of some of her fellow prisoners. This was a unique experience for me, as think it will be for the readers of this journal. Next up is yet another unique perspective on the criminal justice system, in this case a concept have yet to see in the criminological literature: therapeutic mental health courts. Judge Randal Fritzler, a pioneer in applying mental health perspectives in a courtroom (his own court, in fact), addresses a growing concern within the criminal justice system: that a significant proportion of offenders have serious mental health issues, which have a direct impact on their offending behavior. Traditional approaches in criminal justice, following the usual punitive approach and the idea of deterrence, need to be thrown in the dustbin of history when it comes to this kind of offender. Judge Fritzler tells us how this is to be accomplished. Next up is a good look at what delinquency experts know (or should know) all too well: adolescents engage in a lot of risk taking behavior and as such should be treated more leniently. John D. Hewitt, Robert M. Regoli and Christopher A. Kierkus take one of the central arguments in the recent Supreme Court Case of Roper v. Simmons where the basis of the decision (that applying the death penalty to juveniles was unconstitutional) centered around the notion that adolescents can be distinguished from adults by their immaturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility. In the next article, Glenn W. Muschert, Melissa Young-Spillers and Dawn Carr take on the many myths associated with child abduction cases and the alert system. Here they note that the legislation creating the alert system was based upon a few isolated horror stories of child abductions by complete strangers. As their analysis of actual cases demonstrates, the vast majority of abductions stem from familial 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 3/14 conflicts. (Personally found that this research paralleled a master\u2019s thesis chaired in my own department by graduate student Michael Smoll who also arrived at identical conclusions.) One of the central arguments the authors make is that excessive attention to the rare cases of stranger abduction deflects attention away from family conflicts and thus do more harm than good to children. In the fifth article Wendy Hicks utilizes a computer simulation model known as \u201cPowerSim\u201d to analyze the contrast between the deterrence argument and the \u201cbrutalization\u201d argument (offered by Cochran and Chamlin in their study of the re-introduction of the death penalty in Oklahoma). Finally, Terry E. Gingerich and Gregory D. Russell write about their study of the subject of Accreditation and Community Policing by contrasting the views of \u201cStreet Cops\u201d and \u201cManagement Cops.\u201d This study compared CEOs, staff officers/\u200bmiddle managers, first line supervisors and line officers in \u201caccredited agencies\u201d with those of like officers in \u201cnon- accredited agencies\u201d regarding \u201ccommunity policing.\u201d Some of their findings were surprising, such as the fact that line officers in accredited agencies were more receptive of community policing than their counterparts in non-accredited agencies. However, acceptance of community policing was greater the higher the rank (regardless of accreditation). In the previous issue asked readers to begin sending book reviews. So far have not received any am hoping that this will be a regular feature of the journal, in addition to \u201cresearch briefs\u201d (see previous issue for an example). Feel free to send me any comments you may have about the journal, including suggestions for improvements and/\u200bor special issues. 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 4/14 Your support will be appreciated. Please send your research to me at the following e\u2011mail: [profrgs@\u200bcox.\u200bnet] Editor Randall G. Shelden, M.A., Ph.D. The System-Wide Effects of Capital Punishment on the American Criminal Justice System: The Use of Computer Modeling in Death Penalty Research By Wendy L. Hicks Issues pertaining to the use of the death penalty are many and varied. Far too often debate regarding the use of the death penalty centers on emotional arguments regarding the moral questions generated by the use of the death penalty. This paper strives to examine issues surrounding capital punishment utilizing a systems analysis approach. Two models were created utilizing the PowerSim modeling program in an effort to explore the brutalizing effect posited by Cochran and Chamlin in their work on the reintroduction of the death penalty in the state of Oklahoma and the deterrence argument presented by those in favor of capital punishment. While neither PowerSim models provides a definitive answer with regards to the issues inherent in the larger capital punishment debate they do shed some additional light on an otherwise highly complicated social issue. Wendy L. HicksLoyola University New OrleansWendy L. Hicks is currently an associate professor of criminal justice at Loyola University in New Orleans graduate of Michigan State University\u2019s School of Criminal Justice Dr. Hicks also holds a master\u2019s degree in psychology and criminal justice from Illinois State University. She has published on such topics as 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 5/14 police vehicular pursuits, Skinhead neo-Nazi gangs, and police operations and administration. Professor Hicks teaches research methods, statistics, and program planning and evaluation at Loyola University New Orleans. Her areas of interest within the field of criminal justice include quantitative methods, police vehicular pursuits, law enforcement administration, and white supremacy. E\u2011mail: Wlhicks@\u200b loyno.\u200bedu Improving Compliance and Producing Positive Outcomes in the Mental Health Court Setting, with a Brief Look at Dynamic Risk Management By Randal B. Fritzler Criminal behavior and the resultant large scale incarceration of persons with mental illness causes public concern and are associated with illness relapse, hospital recidivism and poor outcomes in treatment. The present approach produces poor outcomes but there is an alternative, therapeutic mental health courts can divert people out of the criminal justice system and engage in effective dynamic risk management. The court can make more efficient use of existing resources and mandate for the community mental health system to provide adequate services for people who need them, such as medication management, psychotherapy, rehabilitation and case management \u2014 services which the patient might not otherwise receive. Court clients can be motivated to engage in positive behavior. All this can be accomplished while protecting the rights of mentally ill individuals and victims. Randal B. FritzlerPacific Policy and Research InstituteRandal B. Fritzler is a senior researcher and principal with Pacific Policy and Research Institute, Inc. and teaches at Western Oregon University. His professional 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 6/14 experience includes fifteen years experience as an attorney in private practice and seventeen years as a state trial court judge. As a judicial officer, he served several terms as the American Judge\u2019s Association representative to the Conference of Chief Justices and advocated for court reform. He has written and published extensively on the subject of specialty courts, court innovation and therapeutic jurisprudence. He has also served on many state and national boards and committees and received state and national recognition for his public service. Degradation, Apathy, and Acceptable Casualties: Serving Time in a Women\u2019s Federal Correctional Institute By Bernadette Olson Despite the dramatic increase in the number of women incarcerated in the United States, there is a significant gap in the literature detailing the female offender and her experiences being processed through the criminal justice machinery, her adaptation and survival within correctional institutes, and her reintegration into society. Concentrating specifically on the daily experiences of life in prison, this manuscript employs a convict perspective to examine the nature of incarcerating females. In addition to the information garnered from the prison literature, this paper utilizes personal accounts of the author (an ex-convict) and her interactions with prisoners to provide a critical look at life and culture hidden behind razor wire. Few people outside the prison walls know what goes on in prison; fewer still are motivated to address the issue. The demonization of the female convict is accepted by a misinformed public, perpetuated by an over-zealous media, promoted by self-serving political figures, and supported by a flawed criminal justice system. The threat these women are believed to possess represents a failure to 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 7/14 acknowledge the damaging effects of even limited incarceration. There is very little practical understanding of the experiences and perspectives of women in prison, therefore, this description is offered to increase awareness, fill the scholarly void, and stimulate a more constructive discourse. Bernadette OlsonIndiana University Southeast in New AlbanyBernadette Olson is currently an assistant professor of criminal justice at Indiana University Southeast in New Albany graduate of Washington State University\u2019s Criminal Justice Program, Dr. Olson also holds a master\u2019s degree in criminal justice and a bachelor\u2019s degree in psychology. She teaches courses in criminal investigation/\u200bpolicing, criminology, and corrections. Professor Olson\u2019s areas of interest within the field are largely focused on serious, violent and chronic offenders, particularly those involving homicide and sexual assault. Her own involvement in the criminal justice system (she served 6 months in a federal correctional institute) has led to an additional research area that explores penal policies and practices; specifically the current nature of incarcerating female offenders, their largely unexplored experiences while in prison and the multi-faceted barriers they face when attempting to rebuild their lives following incarceration. Adolescent Risk-Taking as a Justification for Paternalistic Legal Policy By John D. Hewitt, Robert M. Regoli, and Chris Kierkus The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled the death penalty for persons under age 18 at the time of their crime, was unconstitutional. The ruling was justified, in part, by a continuing perception that adolescent risk- taking clearly differentiates juveniles from adults. The Court referred to 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 8/14 juveniles having a lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility, resulting in \u201cimpetuous and ill-considered actions and decisions.\u201d In earlier decisions the Court said that adolescents are more impulsive and less self-disciplined than adults, and described juveniles as \u201cprone to experiment, risk-taking, and bravado.\u201d This paper examines the nature of risk-taking and how perceptions of juvenile risk-taking have historically been used by the courts to justify an oppressive denial of their personhood and an exemption from punishment proportional to the crime. We examine findings from research on both juvenile and adult risk- taking behaviors. It appears that risk-taking does not end at age 18: it is simply recontexualized to support legally supported policies aimed at maintaining control over youth. We conclude that such policies are both empirically unsound and fundamentally unjust. John D. HewittGrand Valley State UniversityJohn D. Hewitt is professor of criminal justice at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in sociology from Washington State University. Professor Hewitt has published extensively in the areas of juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice policy and is co-author of Delinquency in Society, 6th ed. with Robert Regoli. Robert M. RegoliUniversity of ColoradoRobert M. Regoli is professor of Sociology at University of Colorado. He is the author of more than 100 journal publications and books, past president and fellow of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, and the recipient of two J. William Fulbright Awards. Please direct communication to Robertregoli@\u200bcomcast.\u200bnet Christopher A. KierkusGrand Valley State UniversityChris Kierkus is an Instructor in the department of criminal justice at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Chris has a Master\u2019s degree from State University of New York at Albany where he is currently finishing his 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 9/14 dissertation. His primary research interest focuses on how family and peer factors influence delinquent development over the life course. Accreditation and Community Policing: Are They Neutral, Hostile, or Synergistic? An Empirical Test among Street Cops and Management Cops By Terry E. Gingerich and Gregory D. Russell This research quantitatively examined the relationship between police agency accreditation and community policing in Washington State. Specifically, it compares the opinions (receptiveness to COP) of CEOs, staff officers/\u200bmiddle managers, first line supervisors, and line officers in accredited agencies with those of like officers in non-accredited agencies. The study hypothesized that accreditation (through organizational influences) leads to greater employee receptivity to a department\u2019s policies and procedures, specifically those associated with COP. Data were collected through a statewide survey of 202 Washington law enforcement agencies. Four officers from each agency (divided by rank) were invited to participate, 530 responded. Analysis considered seven control variables: the respondent\u2019s rank, age, veteran status, education, work experience, and accreditation status. Analysis also employed one index variable, constructed from 14 questions related to COP. The authors found that line officers in accredited agencies are significantly more receptive to the philosophy and strategies of when compared to line officers in non-accredited agencies. All other rank groups share similar (generally positive) opinions of COP. The authors also found that acceptance of the philosophies and strategies of (whether in accredited or non-accredited agencies) is universally 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 10/14 predictable based on one\u2019s rank \u2011higher rank = higher receptiveness to COP. Policy implications are also discussed. Terry E. GingerichWestern Oregon UniversityTerry E. Gingerich is an Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Western Oregon University. Prior to entering academia he served 25 years with the Los Angeles County Sheriff\u2019s Department, retiring in 1996 as a sergeant. He is the coauthor of Law Enforcement in the United States (2005). He is an executive board member of the Western Community Policing Institute and a member of the Police Administration Committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. His research interests include police history, ethics, criminal justice policy, and comparative policing. E\u2011mail: gingert@\u200bwou.\u200b edu. Gregory D. RussellArkansas State UniversityDr. Greg D. Russell is the Director of Criminology at Arkansas State University. He is the author of two books, the Death Penalty and Racial Bias (1994) and with coauthors Law Enforcement in the United States (2000, 2005). He has also published in numerous academic journals, such as Police Quarterly, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, and Journal of Crime and Justice, and the American Journal of Criminal Justice. His research interests include policing, the courts, and criminal justice policy. \u201cSmart\u201d Policy Decisions to Combat a Social Problem: The Case of Child Abductions 2002 \u2013 2003 By Glenn W. Muschert, Melissa Young-Spillers, and Dawn Carr 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 11/14 This article examines the child abduction problem during the year following the June 2002 Elizabeth Smart abduction by comparing three aspects of the problem: first, New York Times articles about child abductions; second, social scientific research findings reported in the NISMART\u20112 study; and third, the institution of Plans to deal with the problem. Analysis indicates that the Times and NISMART\u20112 offer markedly different pictures about the nature of the problem, and that Plans are more closely connected with the horror stories of stereotypical kidnappings offered by the news media. The use of Plans to combat the child abduction problem appears misguided, in that it fails to address the larger problem of more common, family abduction types. Discussion is offered regarding the relevance of the research findings with regards to the study of the abduction problem and suggestions are offered for future policy assessment. Glenn W. MuschertMiami UniversityGlenn W. Muschert is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Criminology Program Coordinator at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. His interests are in the mass media coverage of high profile crimes including school shootings and child abductions. Melissa Young-SpillersPurdue UniversityMelissa Young-Spillers is a doctoral candidate in the Law and Society Program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Her research interests lie in child welfare and victimization, and her doctoral work focuses on adoption outcomes for disabled children. Dawn CarrMiami UniversityDawn Carr is a doctoral student in Miami University\u2019s Social Gerontology program. Her research areas include arts, creativity, and \u201cproductive\u201d aging, sociological and gerontological theory, and the sociology of retirement. E\u2011mail: carrdc@\u200bmuohio.\u200bedu 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 12/14 Join us in creating a world that honors every person\u2019s right to justice and safety 424 Guerrero Street Suite San Francisco 94110 Phone: (415) 621-5661 Fax: (415) 621-5466 Email: [email protected] \u00a9 2025 Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Privacy Policy Accessibility Statement Enter your email 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 13/14 2/22/25, 10:46 Justice Policy Journal - Volume 3, Number 2 - Fall 2006 | Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 14/14", "7222_102.pdf": "\u2013 1 1 Master of Arts in Criminal Justice 2 43.0103 3 Dr. Gregory D. Russell, Assoc. Professor Dept. of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography Jonesboro Box 2410 State University, Arkansas 72467 [email protected] (870) 972-3705 4 August 2005 5 Provide a general description of the proposed program. Include overview of any curriculum additions or modifications; program costs; faculty resources, library resources, facilities and equipment; purpose of the program; and any information that will serve as introduction to the program. List existing degree programs that support the proposed program. This program is intended to be a master\u2019s degree that conforms to the nationally accepted standard in the field as indicated by the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. The core courses and elective concentrations most closely resemble a mix between the programs in criminal justice at Washington State University and SUNY, Albany, the number 6 and number 1 schools in the field respectively. It is intended to 1) develop additional analytical skills for in-service practitioners with a in the field or a closely related field; 2) to provide practitioners in this region with access to graduate education in their field in order for them to be more competitive for promotion within state agencies; 3) to provide our undergraduates who wish to pursue a degree regional access to one in their field of choice; and 4) to provide our undergraduate students who are considering a Ph.D. in the field a good foundation for further graduate studies. Initially there are no new courses and the proposed degree program will employ only existing courses and existing faculty lines. The primary contributors will be from two Departments: 1) Criminology, Sociology and Geography, and 2) P-1 2 Political Science. There will be no additional costs to the university in regards to faculty, course offering impacts, or staffing. The program will require the normal allocation of graduate assistantships from the graduate school. Faculty resources are currently sufficient for projected student demand. Library holdings are currently sufficient to support this degree. Classrooms and the Statistics and Research Labs are sufficient to support this degree. 6 Provide survey data (number not percentage) on student interest (number of students planning to enroll), job availability, corporate demands and employment/wage projections. Focus mostly on state needs and less on regional and national needs, unless applicable to the program. Survey data can be obtained by telephone, letters of interest, student inquiry, etc. Focus mostly on state needs for undergraduate programs; and state, regional and national needs for graduate programs. Provide names/types of organizations/businesses surveyed. Letters of support should address the following when relevant: the number of current/anticipated job vacancies, whether the degree is desired or required for advancement, the increase in wages projected based on additional education, etc. Indicate if employer tuition assistance is provided or other enrollment incentives. The in is quickly becoming the path to both employment and promotion in the Criminal Justice system as processes are becoming exceedingly complex. This is particularly true in state agencies (e.g., Probation and Parole which requires the at a minimum) and federal agencies (e.g Marshall Service). Many area practitioners have voiced strong support for the program and believe it will cause state agencies to be more effective and their employees more competitive statewide. Currently, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock has the only such program in the state and it is not sufficient to meet statewide need. Not only have our graduates gone out of state for graduate work in the past two years (e.g., UC, UM, several in Missouri, and others), but undergraduates are similarly limited in their choices. We have 250 undergraduate majors in Criminology. Moreover, those who do go out of state for their master\u2019s degree must pay out-of- P-1 3 state tuition. To establish the degree of local and regional need, we inquired with state and local law enforcement and corrections personnel, and surveyed our students. 1. Six of our Aug. and Dec. 2004 graduates have entered either the in Sociology, the MPA, or the Graduate Certificate in Criminal Justice Program in order to pursue studies in this area. They hope to move into the in if it is approved. 2. Surveys of our seniors (May 2005, Aug. 2005, and Dec. 2005) indicate that 15% Intend to apply for the in if it is available (approximately 12 students). 3. Six recent graduates (2004) have said they will apply for the program if it is approved. 4. We have fielded more than a dozen inquiries from local law enforcement and corrections agencies regarding the possibility of the degree being available at ASU. Personnel learned from our interns in those agencies that we were making an application with the state for this program. As a result, without any solicitation by ASU, seven current state personnel indicated they will apply for the degree. The one current available in-state program is more than 2 hours away from Jonesboro. Those programs out of state are from 1.25 hours to 4 hours away from Jonesboro. From the north and east of Jonesboro the distances to the in- state program grow excessive, making travel prohibitive for those currently in positions. Typically they hold day jobs that make extensive travel impossible. Employment in the field of Criminal Justice, consistent with growth of both the undergraduate and graduate populations nationally, continues to grow at pace of about 5% per year. Some agencies have tuition assistance programs, many have payroll incentives for graduate education. 7 Provide curriculum outline by semester Give total number of semester credit hours required for the program Identify new courses (provide course descriptions) Identify required general education courses, core courses and major courses Identify courses currently offered via distance technology State program admission requirements Describe specified learning outcomes and course examination procedures. Include a copy of the course evaluation to be completed by the student. P-1 4 Admission requirements: 1 or in Criminal Justice, Criminology, Political Science, Psychology, or Sociology. 2. Two letters of recommendation, a statement of purpose 3 3.00 in the final 60 hours of undergraduate work, or prior graduate degree, or at least 6 hours of graduate credit with a or better in all courses attempted, or an score of 139 or better, or a combined score of 900 (quantitative and verbal). New Courses: None Degree Requirements: 1. Core Required Courses: all required (12 hours total) Soc 6233 Criminal Justice Systems Soc 6133 Seminar in Policing Soc 6513 Seminar in Community and Institutional Corrections Soc 6523 Criminal Behavior Soc 6403 Seminar in Juvenile Delinquency 2. Methods Courses (1course required; 3 hours) Soc 6343 Methods of Social Research Soc 6253 Qualitative Methods of Social Research Soc 5343 Geographical Information Systems for the Social Sciences Soc 5323 Applied Research Posc 6573 Grant Writing and Administration Posc 6533 Public Policy Analysis and Evaluation 3. Electives (6 courses required; 18 hours total) from any of the following: Political Science: Posc 6513 Administrative Law Posc 6543 Administrative Behavior Posc 6553 Public Budgeting and Finance Posc 6533 Seminar in Human Resource Management Posc 6503 Managing Local Government Posc 6153 Supreme Court Posc 6523 Decision Making Sociology: Soc 6203 Social Psychology Soc 5233 Social Organizations Soc 5243 Social Theory Soc 6523 Criminal Behavior / Soc 6403 Seminar in Juvenile Delinquency (which ever course was not taken to satisfy core requirements) P-1 5 Soc 6123 Aging, Law and Social Issues Soc 5353 Sociology of Aging Soc 6303 Contemporary Social Theory Soc 6423 Seminar in Race, Gender and Class Any courses in category 2 above which were not taken to satisfy the methods requirement. 4. Degree Plan No later than the second semester after a student enters the program, the student shall select a graduate committee of at least three faculty members from the graduate faculty, at least two of whom must be from the department of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography. The chair of the committee must be from the department of Criminology, Sociology and Geography. Before the end of the second semester the student shall submit a graduate plan to the committee for consideration, which shall indicate the courses the student plans to take to fulfill the degree requirements. At least two members of the committee must approve the plan. 5. Professional Paper The student must write and defend a professional paper, one the student\u2019s graduate committee unanimously agrees is worthy of presentation at a professional conference or submission to a refereed journal. The defense shall be open to all members of the graduate faculty of the University and shall be considered both an oral and written comprehensive examination. The defense shall occur during or after the student\u2019s last semester of course work. 6. The student must otherwise comply with all existing graduate school policy at the time of admission. 8 List the names and credentials of all faculty teaching courses in the proposed program. (For associate and above minimum of one full-time faculty member with appropriate credentials is required.) Total number of faculty required (number of existing faculty, number of new faculty). For new faculty provide the expected credentials/experience and expected hire date. For proposed graduate programs provide the curriculum vita for faculty teaching in the program, and the expected credentials for new faculty and expected hire date. P-1 6 Dr. Gregory Russell, Associate Professor CSG, Director, Criminology Dr. Larry Salinger, Associate Professor Dr. Gretchen Hill, Associate Professor Dr. Doris Chu, Assistant Professor Dr. Mary Donaghy, Assistant Professor Dr. Ellen Lemley, Assistant Professor Dr. Chris Wienke, Assistant Professor Dr. Andrew Knight, Assistant Professor Dr. Patrick Stewart, Associate Professor, POSC, Director Program Dr. David England, Associate Professor Dr. Catherine Reese, Associate Professor Dr. William McLean, Assistant Professor 9 Current library resources in the field Current instructional facilities including classrooms, instructional equipment and technology, laboratories (if applicable) New resources required, including costs and acquisition plan Library resources of greatest significance are the journal holdings. These are considered to be more than adequate to support this degree; both physical holdings and online resources. The primary classroom needs are typical seminar rooms. These are adequate also. Laboratory needs are limited to computer labs. There are two such labs. One is the Statistics Lab in the International Building. It has recently been refitted with high end computers, with a full range of software, including (statistics package) and ArcView (ArcView 9.0) is the top of the line software employed in Social Science, Business, Geography, and other fields including Environmental Science. These resources (and the new printers) are more than adequate to support the program. The second laboratory is the survey research lab in which students learn to design, execute and analyze telephone survey research instruments. Normally, this occurs both within and outside of normal class work, including grants and pure research. The lab is equipped with an auto-dialer, and computer assisted interviewing software for immediate data entry. 10 \u2013 Expenditures for the first 3 years of program operation New administrative costs Number of new faculty (full-time and part-time) and costs New library resources and costs New/renovated facilities and costs 7 New instructional equipment and costs Distance delivery costs (if applicable) Other new costs (graduate assistants, secretarial support, supplies, faculty development, faculty/students research, etc.) We will employ existing facilities, holdings, faculty and courses. There is no need to hire new faculty. This program is supportable with resources currently in place, with the exception of graduate assistants. This will be a cost to the university in one of two ways. First, the university, via the Graduate Dean, may re-allocate existing graduate assistantships to this program thus taking them from another graduate degree; or second, if available, the university will need to fund three new positions, at an annual cost of approximately $25,000 (depending upon the level of stipend set by the Graduate School). The Graduate Dean is currently examining the allocation policy independent of this proposal. No new costs (Explain) 11 \u2013 Income for the first 3 years of program operation Reallocation from which department, program, etc. Tuition and fees (projected number of students multiplied by tuition/fees) State revenues (projected number of students multiplied by state general revenues) Other (grants, employers, special tuition rates, mandatory technology fees, program specific fees, etc 12 Proposed program will be housed in (department/college) The director of the Criminal Justice Graduate Program and Program in Criminology reports to the Chair of the Department of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography who reports to the Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences who reports to the office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Academic Affairs. 13 Specialized accreditation requirements for program (name of accrediting agency) Licensure/certification requirements for student entry into the field 8 Provide documentation of Agency/Board approvals (education, nursing--initial approval required, health-professions, counseling, etc.) There is no current accreditation requirement. There may be one in three to five years as is currently discussing this for graduate undergraduate programs. It is uncertain if it will be adopted any time soon. However, even if it should come to pass, the curriculum described above will meet the current \u201cguidelines.\u201d 14 May 6, 2005 15 List institutions offering program Proposed undergraduate program \u2013 list institutions in Arkansas Proposed master\u2019s program \u2013 list institutions in Arkansas and region The programs closest to Jonesboro and this general region are: University of Arkansas \u2013 Little Rock University of Memphis (Tenn.) Southeast Missouri State University University of St. Louis complete list of graduate programs in the U.S. can be found at the homepage of the American Society of Criminology. Programs in Oklahoma and Texas are too distant to be considered of any value regionally or locally. Proposed doctoral program \u2013 list institutions in Arkansas, region, and nation Why is proposed program needed if offered at other institutions in Arkansas or region? Available programs are too distant for those who are in-service, too distant for undergraduate students from this region, and would require students to either move or pay out-of-state tuition. In addition, the programs that are available are not sufficiently large to satisfy the market demand. For those who are in-service (law enforcement, probation, parole, and corrections) there is no real option. 16 9 State the total number of students, number of black students, and number of other minority students enrolled in related degree programs (if applicable) Nearly half of our graduates who currently are attending other institutions to obtain this degree are people of color. Each would have preferred to stay here. Moreover, the national trend in Master\u2019s Programs in Criminal Justice is a high percentage enrollment of minority students and females. Approximately 15% of our 250 undergraduate majors are people of color and many would prefer to continue their education at the graduate level. In the University as a whole, minority students make up approximately 19% of the student body (with about 15% being African American students). Referencing the discussion of anticipated student enrollment above in section 6, of all of these nearly 1/3 are people of color. For example, this semester our Seminar in Criminal Justice Systems had 11 students. Of these 11, nine were women and three were African-American students (2 female, 1 male). Only two were continuing students. Two of the new students were African-American females, one not an alumnus. In sum, we believe from all available information that we will have an initial cohort of between 15 and 20 students in the fall of 2005; at least 7 will be minority students. Indications are similar for our junior class. Most of our minority students are from this region and prefer to remain here as along as possible for graduate education and employment. Moreover, possession of a graduate degree will provide a far more competitive edge in regards to employment and promotion for both women and minorities. 17 (MOU) If the courses or academic support services will be provided by other institutions or organizations, include a copy of the signed that outlines the responsibilities of each party and the effective dates of the agreement. 18 10 April 20, 2005 Dept. of Criminology, Sociology and Geography Arkansas State University P.O. Box 2410 State University Arkansas, 72467-2410 Phone: (870)-972-3705 fax: (870)-972-3694 [email protected] EDUCATION: degrees: The University of Georgia, (Athens, Georgia), Ph.D., Department of Political Science, Dec. 1991. The University of Akron, (Akron, Ohio), M.A. Department of Political Science, December, 1987. The University of Akron, School of Law, (Akron, Ohio), J.D., June, 1974. Mount Union College, (Alliance, Ohio), B.A. in Political Science, Philosophy Minor, June, 1971. dissertation: Support for the Death Penalty, Death Certification, and Systematic Bias Test of Supreme Court Assumptions. major professor: Dr. Susette Talarico EMPLOYMENT: academic: August 15, 2002 to Present: Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography Director, Program in Criminology June 24, 1996 to August 15, 2002: Washington State University, Pullman Assoc. Professor Department of Political Science/Criminal Justice Program Director, Criminal Justice Program, 1996-2001 Tenured effective Aug. 15, 1999 Dept. Coordinator, Criminal Justice Distance Degree Program, 1998-2001 August 22, 1990 to May 24, 1996: California State University, Chico. Promoted early to Associate Professor of Political Science beginning Fall 11 1992, granted early tenure, beginning Fall 1993. Assistant Professor 1990- 1992. Coordinator of the Criminal Justice Program, August, 1993 to May, 1996. September 1, 1986 to June 30, 1990: Georgia College (nka Georgia college and State University), Milledgeville, Georgia Assistant Professor of Political Science and Criminal Justice September 1, 1986 to June 30, 1990; Coordinator of Criminal Justice Program, September 1986 to September 1988. Coordinator of Legal Assistant Studies Program in LAS), Sept. 1987 to June 1990. Coordinator of the Georgia Public Safety Residence Center (An academic consortium of the University System of Georgia) , July 1987 to June 1990. August 1982 to June 1983: The University of Akron. Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant; survey research interviewer, Department of Political Science refereed articles: 2002 \u201cImplementing by Groping Along Case Study in Program Evolutionary Implementation.\u201d Ellen C. Lemley and Gregory Russell, Justice System Journal, 23 (2):157-190. 1999. Gregory D. Russell and Susan MacLachlan, \u201cCommunity Policing, Decentralized Decision Making and Employee Satisfaction\u201d Journal of Crime and Justice, 22(2): 31-34. 1998 Gregory D. Russell and Robert Waste\u201cThe Limits of Reinventing Government\u201d The American Review of Public Administration, 28(4):325-346. 1998. Gregory D. Russell and Ellen C. Lemley, \u201cRace and Punishment,\u201d Law Studies, 22(1):23-29 1997. Gregory D. Russell. \u201cThe Political Ecology of Police Reform\u201d, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 1997, Vol. 20(3): 567-589. 1997. Gregory D. Russell. \u201cCriminal Justice Research and International Paradigms: Neoliberal Institutionalism, Regimes and Emerging Structures\u201d, Vol. 7, 1997: 113- 129, International Criminal Justice Review. 1994. Gregory D. Russell. \"Liability and Criminal Justice Management: Resolving the Dilemma and Meeting Future Challenges\", 1994. American Journal of Criminal 12 Justice, 18(2, Spring):177-197 1990. Gregory D. Russell. \u201cChanging Assumptions and U.S. Troops in Europe: Containment or Withdrawal\u201d.Southeastern Political Review, 18(1):81-120, Spring 1990. published books: 2005 Law Enforcement in the United States, Second Edition, by Drs. Rebecca Paynich, Terry Gingerich, James Conser, and Gregory Russell; Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Expected publication date, Spring, 2005. First edition by Conser and Russell. Paynich and Gingerich, former doctoral students of Russell. 2000. James Conser and Gregory D. Russell, Law Enforcement in the United States, Aspen Press. 1994. Gregory D. Russell. \u201cThe Death Penalty and Racial Bias: Overturning Supreme Court Assumptions\u201d, Greenwood Press, 1994, Volume 75 in Contribution to Legal Studies series. published book chapters: Police and Corrections Systems of the United States (2005) Co-authored with Asst. Prof. Ellen C. Lemley, Arkansas State University, and James Conser, Prof., Youngstown State University , a chapter for the World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems, Gale Press. An assessment of the policing and criminal justice systems of the United States, all 50 states, and the 20 largest cities and counties in the United States. 250 pages in text, approximately equal contribution. text materials: 2003. Gregory D. Russell. Instructor\u2019s Manual, Reid, Criminal Law, 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill. 2003. Gregory D. Russell, Web content for Cyber Justice page by McGraw-Hill intended as study materials for students using Reid, Criminal Law, 6th Edition. Articles under Review: 2005. Police Agency Accreditation and Community Policing: Neutral or Interactive Concepts? under review with Policing: An International Journal of Police Management and Strategies, co-authored with Dr. Terry Gingerich, Asst. Prof., Western Oregon University. Books under Review: 2005 (expected publication date, Fall). \u201cReinventing Public Administration\u201d Wadsworth Publishing. Joint work with Rebecca Allen, Steven Stehr, David Nice, Ellen Lemley, Art McCurdy, Meredith Newman, Michael Gaffney, Lance LeLoup, and Vickie Clark. Initial draft of manuscript submitted to publisher and now undergoing final edit of third draft. Participation varies among authors. Russell responsible for six complete chapters, parts of two others, and supervision of editing. 13 Major text project. Third and final draft in editing stages. Currently 99% complete. The only task yet to be completed is to format the chapters so that each is constructed in the same manner. works in progress: books: Courts and Criminal Justice Behavioral and Institutional Perspective, book project co-authored with Prof. Ellen C. Lemley, under contract with Roxbury Press, expected submission of final manuscript in Dec. of 2005. Publication in the following spring. Approximately 10% complete. Proposal submitted summer of 2003. Contract awarded Fall, 2003. Democracy and Community Justice: Are the Goals Compatible? (working title). Book project which will compare theories of democracy to theories of community based justice. Comparing the latter to the New Public Management, Refounding, and traditional theories of democratic administration and accountability, the book raises the question as to whether community based justice models, as currently designed, are compatible with traditional constitutional democracy and the rule of law. Co-authored with Ellen C. Lemley, an assistant Professor at Arkansas State University. Publisher not yet determined. Papers and book chapters: Criminological Theory and Crime Policy Agenda Setting paper being prepared for submission, co-authored with Dr. Rebecca Allen, Asst. Prof. Minot State University . The paper examines the factors which make crime policy peculiar in American Politics and makes suggestions for theory that could provide the basis of good policy. 75% complete, contribution is 50% each. Restorative Justice and Racial Bias. The paper, co-authored with Dr. Rebecca Allen, Asst. Prof. Minot State University examines the essential aspects of restorative justice and argues that this model of non-retributive justice is more likely to exhibit racial bias in its outcomes than the current retributive system. Will be submitted to Criminal Justice Policy Review. Contribution is approximately 65% Allen, 35% Russell. About 75% complete. Accreditation and Community Policing. This project, part of the doctoral research by Dr. Terry Gingerich , Asst. Prof. Western Oregon University, is an attempt to directly test the Cordner hypothesis that accreditation and community policing are unrelated (i.e., the former is neither hostile to nor supportive of COP). In a survey of all Washington State law enforcement agencies (70% response rate) employing a modified snowball procedure with a total of 530 (to date) we examine self-reported behaviors associated with the two notions robust data set suggests from early analysis important findings. The first paper (of many) from this study is under review and it will serve as the foundation for an expected or grant. Published studies: 2000. Ellen C. Lemley Gregory D. Russell, and Mike Erp, Fourth Quarter/Second Year and Final Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in 14 Spokane Washington. Presented July 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the first quarter of the second year of the project grant. Data analysis shows success in reducing recidivism and changing attitudes of offenders. 2000. Ellen C. Lemley Gregory D. Russell, and Mike Erp, Third Quarterly-Second Year Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented March 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the first quarter of the second year of the project grant. Data analysis shows success in reducing recidivism and changing attitudes of offenders. 2000. Ellen C. Lemley Gregory D. Russell, and Mike Erp, Second Quarterly- Second Year Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented January 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the first quarter of the second year of the project grant. While the first year study was largely an implementation (process) study, this evaluation was the first to examine outputs. 1999. Gregory D. Russell, Ellen C. Lemley, and Mike Erp. First Quarterly-Second Year Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented October 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the first quarter of the second year of the project grant. While the first year study was largely an implementation (process) study, this evaluation was the first to examine outputs. 1999. Gregory D. Russell, Ellen C. Lemley, and Mike Erp. Fourth Quarterly Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented July 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the fourth quarter of the project grant 1999. Gregory D. Russell, Ellen C. Lemley, and Mike Erp. Third Quarterly Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented April 5, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the third quarter of the project grant 1999. Gregory D. Russell, Ellen C. Lemley, and Mike Erp. Second Quarterly Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented Jan. 5, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the second quarter of the project grant. 1998. Gregory D. Russell, Ellen C. Lemley, and Mike Erp. First Quarterly Evaluation of the Community and Restorative Justice Project in Spokane Washington. Presented Oct. 1, to the Washington Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council for the first quarter of the project grant. 1998. Gregory D. Russell and Michael Dunbaugh . Adopting to Your Agency, a written presentation for the Western Regional Institute for Community Oriented Public Safety (WRICOPS), a partner, April, 1998; Dunbaugh is the Chief of the Santa Rosa Police Department. 15 1988. Ellen C. Lemley and Gregory D. Russell 3rd charges in Spokane County Data Analysis and System Design, a study presented to the Community Justice Committee in Spokane in preparation for a restorative justice grant application with the State of Washington. Co-authored by Ellen C. Lemley, graduate student. 1997. Gregory D. Russell. Restorative Justice and Decentralized Community Corrections, a literature review presented to the Washington Department of Corrections (Jack Brucick, Spokane Unit) in anticipation of administrative planning for large scale implementation of a plan in that division. 1997. Gregory D. Russell, Nicholas P. Lovrich, Michael J. Gaffney, Arthur H. McCurdy Untaxed Goods in Commerce: Tax Evasion in the State of Washington, a study prepared for the Washington State Highway Patrol under terms of a grant to study tax fraud in the State of Washington. Report was summarized in testimony to the State Legislature. The study examined the investigative approaches to policing untaxed or smuggled goods, sources and likely amounts of those goods and recommended policy initiatives, including the training of all non-sworn investigators in state government. 1996 Gregory D. Russell Implementation in Chico PD: Report to Chief Michael Dunbaugh, April. published book reviews: 2003: Review for the Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 19 (2, May), of Policing in America Balance of Forces, 3rd Edition, by Robert H. Langworthy and Lawrence f. Travis, III. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003. 2002: Review for Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 19 (1, February): 147-149, of Death Watch Death Penalty Anthology, by Lane Nelson and Burk Foster, Prentice Hall, 2001. 2001: Review for Police Quarterly, 4(4, Dec.):487-489, of Street-Level Leadership: Discretion and Legitimacy in Front-Line Public Service, by Janet Coble Vinzant and Lane Crothers, Georgetown University Press. 2001: Review invited by The Justice System Journal (Volume 22, Issue 3, Fall) of Transforming the Law: Essays on Technology, Justice and the Legal Marketplace, by Richard Susskind., Oxford Press. 1998. Review invited by Congress and the Presidency Journal of Capital Studies, of The tides of Reform, by Paul Light. 1995. Review requested by the Southeastern Political Review, 23 (3, September) 541-544,, of \"Appointment of Judges: The Johnson Presidency\", McFeeley, U. of Texas Press. 1994. Book review requested by and published in the Fall Newsletter, Policy Currents, of \"Deregulating the Public Service: Can Government Be Improved?\" by John J. DiIulio, Jr., Ed. Newsletter of the Policy section of the American Political 16 Science Association. 1992. Book review (at the request of the Policy Studies Section of the American Political Science Association) published in the Fall 1992 Newsletter, Policy Currents, of \"Against Excess: Drug Policy for Results\" by Mark Kleinman, Basic Books,. Newsletter of the Policy section of the American Political Science Association. 1992. American Political Science Review, 86(2):530-531,. Review at the invitation of the of: \u201cCourts, Corrections and the Constitution\u201d, by DiIulio, Editor; \u201cNo Escape\u201d, by DiIulio; \u201cThe Scale of Imprisonment\u201d, by Zimring and Hawkins; and \u201cJails\u201d, by Zupan GRANTS: research: Research Grants and Consultant Awards: 1998 - 2001 Washington State Law and Justice Council and the Washington Department of Corrections, with Ellen C. Lemley and Michael Erp. Grant budget line of $5,000 per first two fiscal years, $7,000 for year three, to evaluate the implementation and impact of a project to develop a community based offender program in Spokane Washington involving police, courts, corrections, and volunteer personnel. 1996-1997 Washington State Patrol Untaxed Goods Study Co-Principle Investigator with Dr. Nicholas Lovrich in a grant from the Washington State Highway Patrol to study the degree of harm resulting from and likely methods of prevention of tax evasion in the state of Washington as a result either of diversion of products from the normal streams of commerce (such as diesel fuel) or the smuggling thereof into the state in order to avoid payment of state sales and excise taxes. Grant total was $100,000 producing a report, Untaxed Goods in Commerce: Tax Evasion in the State of Washington. 1996 Grant incentive award, Dean, College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, California State University, Chico. $2,500 1993-1994 California Department of Corrections: Leadership Institute Lead consultant and primary author for the Center for Regional and Continuing Education, California State University, Chico, under a grant from the California Department of Corrections to create and implement an elite executive leadership and management institute for senior executives of the department including deputy directors, wardens, and program directors. Total five year funding by is over $850,000. Institute was initiated in the Fall of 1994 with David Kalinich selected to direct the institute. Awards: Nominated for Advising Award, Arkansas State University. Nominated by student for advising award Spring, 2003. 17 Chair\u2019s Recognition Award, 2001 Special award from Department Chair for service as Director of Criminal Justice from 1996-2001, Washington State University. Faculty Appreciation Award: Excellence in Mentoring and Advising, 1999, 2000. Yearly award from Department\u2019s Graduate Students (all) for Mentoring and Advising of graduate students and for graduate committee service. Outstanding Faculty Award, Alpha Phi Sigma, Washington State University: 1997, 1999. Yearly award from the Criminal Justice Honor Society, Alpha Chapter, presented to the professor chosen by the students (Undergraduate and graduate) as the outstanding faculty for the year. Two national awards for my Extended Degree Criminal Justice 150 Course at which was co-produced by a director from the media section of the office of distance degree programs. 1998: First Place, Aegis Awards 1998: Honorable Mention, The Communicator Awards graduate study awards: Pi Sigma Alpha: 1983, the University of Akron, Alpha Alpha Chapter. Founding Advisor, Chapters at Georgia College and State University, California State University, Chico Brachton\u2019s Inn: Awarded for Moot Court performance, 1974. The University of Akron, School of Law. papers presented: Police Agency Accreditation and its Relationship with Community Policing in Washington State Perspective from Street Cops to Management Cops. Paper presented on November, 18, 2004 at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Nashville, TN. Justice and Democracy: Is community based justice \u201cmore\u201d democratic? Paper presented on November 17, 2004 at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Nashville, TN. Theories of Community Justice and Theories of Democracy: Harmony or Conflict? Paper given as part of a Brown Bag series within the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, November 12, 2004. Designing and Implementing an Adult Restorative Justice Program: 18 Hopeful Beginnings and Bureaucratic Resistance Ellen C. Lemley and Gregory Russell, presented at the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators annual meeting, Sacramento, Ca., Oct. 2000, and annual meeting, American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, Ca, Nov. 2000. Implementing by Groping Along Struggle in Program Evolutionary Implementation. Ellen C. Lemley and Gregory Russell, presented at the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators annual meeting, Sacramento, Ca., Oct. 2000, and annual meeting, American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, Ca, Nov. 2000. The New Justice Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, at San Diego, CA., March 30-April 3, 2000.. Defining and Implementing Restorative Justice: An Analytical Perspective Paper presented with Ellen C. Lemley at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences at Orlando, FL, March 1999. Implementation of and Decentralization: Temporal Ordering of Reforms Paper co-authored with Chief Michael Dunbaugh, Santa Rosa Police Department, for the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, March, 1998. Implementing Restorative Justice: An Evaluation of Program Design Effectiveness in Decentralization Efforts. Paper co-authored with Ellen Lemley and Susan MacLachlan, Washington State University, Program in Criminal Justice, for the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, March 1998, entitled Simon\u2019s Proverbs Revisited: Community Policing and Organizational Design. presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Gault House Hotel, Louiseville, KY, March, 11-15, 1997. The Limits of Reinventing Government presented at the 1996 meeting, San Francisco Hilton and Towers, August, 1996, co-authored with Dr. Robert Waste. Public Administration and the Limits of the Reinventing Government Dialogue: Reinvention, Refounding and the Modern Administrative State. presented at the meeting in Atlanta, June 1996 co-authored with Dr. Robert Waste. Community Policing as Reform Test of Competing Models, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, at the Riviera Hotel, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 12-16, 1996. Co-authored with Ms. Susan MacLachlan (BA, 1995, CSUC). Teaching Criminal Justice Policy Evaluation: Forecasting, Evaluation and Strategic Planning for Criminal Justice Seniors, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators, at the Reno, Hilton, Reno, Nevada, November 15-18, 1995. Law Enforcement Reform: Integrating Community Policing and Traditional Models, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western and Pacific Association of 19 Criminal Justice Educators, at the Reno, Hilton, Reno, Nevada, November 15-18, 1995. Co-authored with Ms. Susan MacLachlan (BA, 1995, CSUC). Criminal Justice Research and International Paradigms: Neoliberal Institutionalism, Regimes and Emerging Structures, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Marriott Riverwalk Hotel, San Antonio, Texas, July 22-25, 1995. The Politics of Training: The Theory-Training Nexus in Law Enforcement and Corrections, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, March 16-18, 1995, Hilton Hotel, Portland , OR. The Political Ecology of Police Reform, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, March 7-11, 1995, Park Plaza Hotel, Boston, MA. The Effects of Police Civilian Review Boards: The Ecology of Police Reform, Research Symposium of the Sector of Public Administration Research and Theory of the American Society for Public Administration, University of California, Berkeley, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, July 19, 1993. Support for the Death Penalty, Death Certification, and Systematic Bias Test of Supreme Court Assumptions, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in Atlanta, Georgia, November 1992. Good Management and Management Liability as a Growing Dilemma: An Academic Resolution for the Trainer, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 1992. Implementation Theory in Multi Actor Systems Test of the Conventional Wisdom, presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, August 1991. Implementation in a Multi Actor System: Further Test of the Conventional Wisdom in Public Safety, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Georgia Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, February 1990. Containment Revisited, Paper presented at The International Studies Association/South and the Southern Political Science Association Joint Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, November 1988. The Death Penalty: Need for Constitutional Reform, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Georgia Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, February 1987. Air-Land Battle: The Nuclear Issues, Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association and International Studies Association/South joint Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, November 1986. conference 20 service: Panel Chair at the American Society for Criminology annual meeting, November 17, 2004, Nashville, Tenn. Organized two panels on the Trends in Policing and Trends in Community Justice for the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Washington DC, March, 2003. Organized and Chaired two panels at the annual meeting of the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators, at Sacramento, CA, Oct. 2000. Panel Member, Midyear meeting of the Police Administration Committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, joint meeting with Police Section of ACJS, at annual meeting of ACJS, Orlando, FL, March, 1999. Panel member (invited), Panel on Highway Tax Evasion, Council of State Governments, San Francisco, Aug. 23, 1997, annual western conference. Presenter, \u201cCriminal Justice and Health Research\u201d at May 22, 1997 conference, \u201cInterdisciplinary Research on Community and Health\u201d at WSU-Spokane. Member, Program Committee for the 1997 National Conference. Chaired panel and served as discussant for Panel on Community Policing Emerging Issues, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, March 11-15, 1997, Louisville, KY, Gault House Hotel. Organized Mobile Workshop for the conference in Atlanta, June 29, 1996 which included a tour, luncheon and presentations at the Georgia Public Safety Training Center south of Atlanta. Served as Chair and Discussant for a panel at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Las Vegas, Nevada, March, 1996, on the topic Public Attitudes Towards Female Police Officers. Served as panel chair for panel on New Wave Methods in Evaluation, at the Trinity Research Symposium, Trinity University, July 23, 1995, San Antonio, Texas (in conjunction with conference, this work- shop was the second in a series organized by W. George Frederickson). Served as Discussant for Panel on Networking in the Public Sector at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, March 16-18, 1995, Hilton Hotel, Portland , OR. Served as Panel Chair for a panel on Recent Developments in the Law of the Death Penalty, at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, March 7-11, 1995, Boston Plaza Hotel, Boston, MA. Served as Panel Chair for a panel on Administrative Control: Politics versus Bureaucracy - In Theory and Practice, at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political 21 Science Association, March 10-12, 1994, Doubletree Hotel and Convention Center, Albuquerque, NM. Served as Panel Chair and Discussant on Policy Implementation and Impact, Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, November 3-8, 1993, Savannah, Georgia. Organized and Chaired two panels at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Science in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 1992, on the subjects of the merger of criminal justice training and education. Symposium on Drugs in America. Panel Participant, Panel on Solutions, School of Arts and Sciences Spring Symposium, May 1990, Georgia College. Governor's Conference on Justice. Conference Participant. Milledgeville, Georgia, December 1989. \u201cPublic Policy\u201d Panel Chair, Georgia Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia, February 1989. \u201cPanel on the Death Penalty\u201d. Panel Chair, Conference on The Constitution, University Center on the Constitution, Emory University School of Law, Atlanta, Georgia, January 1989. non-academic employment: January 1984 to June 30, 1986: Municipal Attorney (Department Head) with the following duties: Criminal Prosecution (Felony and Misdemeanor) Police In-Service Training Municipal Commissions, civil litigation, bond work, and legislation. November 1974 to December 1983: Private Law Practice, State of Ohio (currently voluntary inactive status, Ohio Supreme Court, Office of Attorney Registration). June 1971 to November 1971: Mahoning County Community Action Council (Youngstown, Ohio) Youth Counselor and Office Coordinator for target grant program SERVICE: referee: Police Quarterly (two articles in 2000) Justice Systems Journal (two articles in 2000; one in 2003) Policy Studies Journal (one in 1994) Political Research Quarterly (one in 1996) Criminal Justice Policy Review (one article in 2001, two in 2002, two in 2003, one in 2004) Journal of Criminal Justice Education (one article in 2003) 22 editorial board: Criminal Justice Review 1995-1999 Criminal Justice Policy Review 2001-2005 World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems, 2nd Edition 2003 - 2005. editor: The Key, newsletter of the Section on Criminal Justice Administration, American Society for Public Administration, Spring 1992 to Summer 2004. section officer: Immediate past-chair, Section on Criminal Justice Administration, American Society for Public Administration, 2004 - 2006 (committee chair duties). Chair of the Section on Criminal Justice Administration of the American Society for Public Administration, 1995-1996; 1999-2000, 2001-2004. Member of Executive Committee: Section on Public Administration Research and Theory 1996-1998; Section on Criminal Justice Administration 1998-1999, 2000-2004 committee member: Member of the Policy Issues Committee of the American Society for Public Administration, 1995-1999. Member of the Police Administration Committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2000 - present judge: Served as chair of a panel of three judges for the 1996 Section Newsletter Awards. manuscript reviewer: Wadsworth Publishing 2004, Essentials of Criminal Justice 4th Ed., Senna and Siegel 2001, Crime and Punishment History of the Criminal Justice System, Wadsworth 2000, Criminal Justice in America, 2nd Ed. , Cole and Smith 2000, Policing, unknown author(s) 2000, Criminal Justice, developmental review, authors unknown 1998, Criminal Justice in Action, author unknown; 1996, Criminal Justice in America Critical Approach, developmental review 1995: The Color of Justice, Walker, Spohn and DeLone, full manuscript review. Prentice-Hall 2000 Introductory Statistics for Criminal Justice and Criminology, Proctor Harcourt, Brace, 1996, August: The Craft of Legal Reasoning, by Brian Porto; 23 1993, Public Administration, a developmental review, author unknown. Longman Publishing, 1994 reviewed new edition of Peters, The Politics of Bureaucracy. . D. C. Heath, 1994, a new American Government Text (author unknown). St. Martin\u2019s Press, Summer 1991; Fall 1991; Fall 1992 (Various developmental reviews) West Publishing Co., 1990 Samaha\u2019s Criminal Law 2000 Samaha\u2019s Criminal Justice McGraw-Hill, 2002, Criminal Law 6th Edition, by Sue Titus Reid, McGraw-Hill 2000 Reid Criminal Law Roxbury Publishing 2002, The American Legal System, Melone and Karnes 2004, Criminal Justice Policy Making, Israel, Prospectus review consultant: Seattle Municipal Court, December 2000, preparatory discussion to grant for the study of their drivers license restoration program and their auto seizure policy. Western Regional Institute for Community Oriented Policing; conference presenter and trainer, April, 1998. California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, Spring, 1992 to 1996: April 1992, April 1993, and April 1994 Command College Consultant annual program review. Command College and Executive Training Review panel Study; a three day closed national symposium on executive training, and assessment of current offerings, Sept. 1992, Sacramento CA. California Command College (Independent Study Project) Consultant, Spring 1992 to 1996 (similar to thesis advisor). Chico Police Department, Chico, California Chairperson for the Chico Juvenile Issues Task Force, Fall 1995-June 1996, an emerging community consortium of non-profit organizations, citizen groups and law enforcement personnel intending to develop a broad-based effort to put into place multiple plans to divert youth from violence, gang involvement and related issues. Served on Lieutenant Candidacy Assessment Center Panel, 1992 Georgia Public Safety Training Center, Forsyth, Georgia. July 1987 to 1990. 24 July 1987 to June 1990-coordinated all research and training provided by University System faculty at the Center. Position title was Coordinator, Georgia Public Safety Residence Center. This involved supervision of all executive management and supervisory course design and related research by faculty of the University System of Georgia. Course offerings were for executive development programs in all public safety areas, including police, state police, fire, EMS, corrections, fish and game. Authored and delivered course materials on executive and management liability in public safety. Certified by the Georgia Peace Officer Standards and Training Council as an instructor, Executive and Management Liability. Expert witness testimony: 2002-05 Expert witness in Hunt v. Whitman County (WA), wrongful death in a lethal officer involved shooting of a suicidal man. Will testify sometime in 2003 or 2004. Issued formal report in the fall, 2003, with a deposition scheduled for Feb. 2004. Witness for the family of the plaintiff. 1999 Expert witness, Hearren v. Spokane County District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, March and December. Qualified as Expert in Police Management and Operations. Testified for successful Plaintiff. Served as State\u2019s witness in Motion for Change of Venue. Butte County , CA, April of 1996 Mike Ramsey, Attempted Murder Case, Venue Change Denied, State v. Bart Ellis Served as Defense witness in Death Penalty case, State v. Hightower, in Baldwin County Ga., April, 1988, subject was challenge to racial make-up of Jury pool MEMBERSHIPS: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Sections: Police American Society of Criminology American Society for Public Administration Sections: Criminal Justice Administration Public Administration Research and Theory International Association of Chiefs of Police (Associate Member) Police Administration Committee Public Management Research Association Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs 1997-2001 Accreditation Review Committee, Member 1999-2001 Southwestern Criminal Justice Association SERVICE: Chair, Pullman Police Advisory Committee, member 1996-1997; Chair 1998-2000 Committee which serves as a public forum for voicing concerns 25 Regarding police performance and behavior, including making recommendations to the Chief and command staff as well as hearing public complaints. Resigned effective January, 2001. Member Investigative Study Group, Fall 1997. Group assembled by the Washington State legislative to study and report back to the legislature and governor regarding the need for training of investigators (non-sworn law enforcement) currently employed in state agencies, particularly when the nature of the investigation might extend to criminal procedures. Co-chaired by the State Attorney General and Chief of the State Patrol. Chair of Chico Area Task Force on Youth and Gang Violence, 1995-6, sponsored by Chico Police Department. This emerging organization was created to respond to a sharp increase in juvenile related violence in the community and recent gang activity including shootings. The effort involves members of the school board, county supervisors, office of the sheriff, city council, and dozens of community organizations. The target of the campaign is to create volunteer approaches to prevention of youth violence. It incorporates everything from peer counseling to alternate dispute resolution in the community, from employment to training and education. The activities will include multiple grant applications in partnership with the University. Member of the Butte County Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Commission which oversees the operation of Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Probation and Juvenile Court policy in Butte County, CA.1995-6 Alliance Area Development Corporation. Member of the Board of Directors of non-profit community development corporation certified by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as a Community Investment Corporation (issuer of IDRBs, and grants, bonds, etc.)1984-1986. Alliance Area Visiting Nurses Association Member of the Board of Directors, Vice President, and President (2 terms) of community home health care agency with seven figure budget, 1980-1984. Reentry Inc. Member of the Board of Directors of a large county mental health agency, 1977-1980 SERVICE: Graduate Student Committees: 2002 - 2003 While at Arkansas State University: Chair, Dissertation Committee of Dr. Terry Gingerich, defended November, 2002, at Washington State University Chair, Dissertation Committee of Dr. Rebecca Allen, Chair, defended May, 2003 at Washington State University 26 Member, Dissertation Committee of Dr. Lucy Hockstein, defended August, 2002, at Washington State University 1996 - 2001 Washington State University At Washington State University, chaired over 50 Master of Arts in Criminal Justice Committees, member on approximately 30 others. Chair of four doctoral preliminary examination committees, member of three others, and member of three dissertation committees defending between 1997 and 2000. 1990 - 1996 California State University, Chico Chaired approximately 30 thesis committees, member of approximately 20 others. 1986 - 1990 Georgia College Chair or member of approximately 15 committees. Arkansas State University: Director, Program in Criminology, 2002 - current University Committees: Member, Enrollment Management Task Force 2004 - Member Enrollment Management Committee 2003 - current Member Research Advisory Committee Representative, 2003 - current Perkins Advisory Committee 2002 - current Member, Strategic Planning Task Force on Graduate Education and Research 2003 - College Committees: College Appeals Committee 2002 - 2003 Departmental Committees: Department Graduate Committee, 2002 - current Chair Faculty Search Committee 2002-2003 Successfully hired Dr. Doris Chu Chair, Department Technology Committee 2003 - current Co-Liaison to Political Science for concentration in Justice Administration in degree 2002 - current, and creation of Graduate Certificate in Criminal Justice, approved in the Spring of 2004. 27 Chair of Committee to develop in Criminal Justice 2004 - current; proposal going forward in late November. Department Executive Committee 2003 - current Department Curriculum Committee 2003 - current Department Evaluation Committee 2003 - current Washington State University: Mentor, McNair Undergraduate Scholar (\u201cGela\u201d Maria Angelica Mendoza Baez, now a graduate student at Florida Atlantic in Forensic Science, pursing a Ph.D. in Forensic Science), Spring - Summer, 2001; student is continuing research with us on forensic profiling. Member, Curriculum Development Committee in Leadership, 2000-2001 Institutional Representative of to Camp Challenge, Ft. Knox, July 2000 Member, University Extended Degree Program Advisory Committee 1998-2001 Member Dean\u2019s Leadership Council 1999-2001 Member, Provost\u2019s Task Force on Academic Excellence 1999-2000 Member, Ad Hoc Task Force on Greek Learning and Living Environments, 1999-00 Chair, Department Faculty Search Committees: Criminal Justice Searches, 1997, 1998, and 1999, member, 2000. Parliamentarian, Faculty Senate, 1997-1998; member, 1999-2001. Director, Criminal Justice Program, Department of Political Science 1996-2001. Coordinator, Department of Political Science / Criminal Justice Program, Extended Degree Program, 1998-2001 by distance learning). Member, Department Graduate Studies Committee 1996-2001. Member, Department Computer Committee, 1999-2001. Tier University Writing Portfolio Grader, Fall 1997-2000; Tier grader, 1998-1999. Department Peer Advising Mentor 1997-1998 Hosted Fulbright Scholar in summer of 1998, serving as Faculty Associate. Football recruiting on multiple Saturday sessions, in 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000. 28 CSU, Chico: Member of the Political Science Department's Student Committee, 1990-1995, Chair, 1991-1995. Member of the Political Science Department's Public Administration Committee, 1990-1996. Member of the Political Science Department\u2019s Graduate Committee, 1995-1996. Chair of Department Assessment Committee, 1992-1993. Member of the School of Behavioral and Social Sciences Scholarship Committee, 1991-1992, 1992-1993 (Chair, 1992). Elected Representative to the Academic Senate, 1992-1994; Committees: Student Policies Committee (Secretary, 1992-3; Vice-Chair, 1993-4) Sub-Committee on Racial Harassment Policy, Faculty and Student Policies Committee 1994 Sub-Committee Chair : Integration of Union Contract and Faculty Policies Manual, Faculty Senate Representative to the Community Affairs Council, a joint council of the University Associated Students and Municipality of Chico, 1991-1992; 1992-1993. Faculty advisor for the (Political Science Students Union) for 1991-1992; 1992- 1993. Volunteer for \u201cGetting Connected\u201d in August 1991,1992 and 1993. Program for incoming freshman to get acquainted with the campus. Member of the Graduate Studies Board, Social Sciences Panel, 1992-1995 Term Founding Faculty Advisor for Chapter of Pi Sigma Alpha, 1994-6. Founding Faculty Advisor for Criminal Justice Student Union, 1994-6. Georgia College: Chairman of the Chancellor\u2019s Academic Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice, University System of Georgia, 1989 to 1990; Vice-Chairman, 1988-1989; College Representative from 1986 to 1990, reporting directly to the Regents and Chancellor. Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Georgia Public Safety Residence Center. Steering Committee composed of the Chief Academic Officers of each of the five System campuses which composed the Residence Center, an off campus research and consulting center located in the Georgia Public Safety Training Center. This committee reported directly to the Chancellor.1987-1990. Member of University of Georgia System-Wide Assessment Task Force 1989-1990. 29 College Pre-law advisor, 1989-1990 Search Committee Chair: 1989-1990, Department of Government and Sociology. School of Arts and Sciences Representative to the College Committee on Grievances, 1988-1990. Founding Faculty advisor of Rho Mu chapter of Pi Sigma Alpha, 1990. Faculty Senate, 1988. Member of the President's Committee on Buildings, 1989-1990 and President's Committee on the Performing Arts, 1986-1987 Founding Faculty Advisor to Law and Society Association, 1990 Arkansas State University: Fall 2002 Crim 4703 Dept. Internships Crim 4103 Criminal Justice Systems Crim 6513 Seminar in Corrections (graduate) Spring 2003 Crim 4703 Dept. Internships Crim 4103 Criminal Justice Systems Crim 3223 Police and Society Summer 2003 Crim 4703 Dept. Internships Crim 4103 Criminal Justice Systems Crim 3223 Police and Society Fall 2003 Crim 4703 Dept. Internships Crim 4103 Criminal Justice Systems Crim 3223 Police and Society Spring 2004 Crim 4703 Dept. Internships Crim 4103 Criminal Justice Systems Crim 3223 Police and Society Summer 2004 Crim 3223 Police and Society Crim 2263 Criminal Evidence and Procedure Fall 2004 30 Crim 3223 Police and Society Crim 2043 Community Relations in the Administration of Justice Crim 2253 Criminal Investigation Washington State University: undergraduate: Summer 1996 CrmJ 330 Crime Prevention Policies Fall 1996; Spring 1997; Fall 1999; Spring, Fall 2000 CrmJ 150 Organizational Environment of Criminal Justice Fall 1997, Spring 1998 CrmJ 101 Introduction to Criminal Justice Spring 1998 CrmJ 420M The Law of Evidence and Criminal Procedure Summer 2002 Pols 340 Introduction to Public Administration graduate Fall 1996 CrimJ 530 Criminal Justice: Process and Institutions Spring 1997, Spring 1998, Fall 1998; Fall 1999 CrmJ 550 Planned Change in Criminal Justice Organizations Summer 1998 CrmJ 592 Issues in Criminal Justice: Guns, Gangs, Death Penalty, and Profiling Summer 1999 CrmJ 592/Pols 542 Issues in Criminal Justice/Pols 542 Pro- seminar in Administration, Justice and Applied Policy Studies: Implementation Theory and Criminal Justice Policy Summer 2000 CrmJ 592/Pols 542 Problem Definition in Criminal Justice Policy Making, Race, Guns, Punishment. Summer 2001 CrmJ 592 Issues in Criminal Justice/ Pols 542 Pro-seminar in Administration, Justice and Applied Policy: Research Applications in Criminal Justice and Political Science Spring 2002 CrmJ 540 / Pols 541 Program and Policy Evaluation Spring 1999, 2000, 2001,2002 CrmJ 570 Policing and Society distance degree program: Fall 1998-Spring 2001, CrmJ 150 (includes summer) (asynchronous) Fall 1999-Spring 2001, CrmJ 420 (includes summer) (web based) California State University, Chico: undergraduate: 1990-1996 265 Administration of Justice (Criminal Procedure 260A Introduction to Public Administration 150 Introduction to Criminal Justice 289 Internship in Criminal Justice/ Public Admin. 31 262 Organization Theory 264 Administrative Law 221A Introduction to Political Inquiry (Scope/Methods 259B Criminal Justice Policy graduate: 1991-1992; 1992-1993,1993-1994, 1994-1995 362 Seminar in Organization Theory 360A Seminar in Public Management 302 Public Administration and Democracy 380 Culminating Practicum (Thesis Class) Georgia college: 1986 - 1990 undergraduate 405 American Constitutional Liberties 468 Administrative Law and Politics 305 Criminal Law and Its Process 322 Probation, Parole, Diversion 342 Criminal Justice Administration (Criminal Procedure 352 The Juvenile Justice System graduate 505 American Constitutional Liberties 630 Administration of Justice 568 Administrative Law and Politics REFERENCES: University of Georgia: Susette Talarico Department of Political Science Baldwin Hall The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602 1-706-542-2057 Other references available upon request. 32 2005 Department Of Criminology, Sociology, Social Work, and Geography Arkansas State University Box 2410 State University 72467-2410 Voice: (870) 972-3165 Fax: (870) 972-3694 E-mail: [email protected] 1205 Chimney Chase Dr. Jonesboro (870) 935-2553 Ph.D. July 2004 Washington State University Research and exam fields: Criminal Justice; Public Administration; Criminological Theory Current 3.89/4.00 Criminal Justice December 1998 Washington State University Masters Essay: Restorative Justice: An operational statement of theory and proposed limited test June 1994 California State University Chico Major: Social Science Minors: Criminal Justice and Sociology Articles and Studies: Instructors Resource Manual For American Corrections 7th Edition. Thomson Learning. Summer 2005 publication date. \u201cAmerican Police and Corrections chapter in World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems\u201d. George Kurian, editor. The chapter is approximately 250 pages and was co-authored with Gregory Russell and Jim Conser. Pulication date is spring 2005. 33 Lemley, Ellen and Gregory D. Russell (2002). \u201cImplementing Restorative Justice by Groping Along Case Study in Program Evolutionary Implementation.\u201d Justice Systems Journal 23(2): 157-190 Lemley, Ellen and Vicki Tate (In Press) \u201cReinventing the Public Policy Process and Co- Production\u201d in Reinventing Public Administration. Edited by Gregory D. Russell. In press, Wadsworth/West. Lemley, Ellen (2001) \u201cDesigning Restorative Justice Policy: An Analytical Perspective\u201d Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(1): 43-65 Lemley, Ellen (Summer 2000) \u201cRestorative Justice and Implementation.\u201d The Key. Newsletter for Section of Criminal Justice Administration of the American Society of Public Administration. Volume 23(3) p. 3-5. Russell, Gregory D. and Ellen Lemley (1998) \u201cRace and Punishment\u201d Law Studies. Volume 22 (1) Fall p. 23-26 Research in Progress: Courts and Criminal Justice Behavioral and Institutional Perspective (working title) Contract with Roxbury publishing. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell. The New Public Administration and the New Justice (working title). Book project which will compare theories of democracy to theories of community based justice. Comparing the latter to the New Public Management, Refounding, and traditional theories of democratic administration and accountability, the book raises the question as to whether community based justice models, as currently designed, are compatible with traditional constitutional democracy and the rule of law. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell November 2000- $200 Travel Grant for Conference Participation awarded by the Department of Political Science May 2000- Scott and Betty Lukins Graduate Fellowship. Awarded by the Thomas S. Foley Institute of ($1000). January 1999- Nominated for the Harriet Riggas Outstanding Woman in Graduate Studies at the Master\u2019s Level. May 1999- Paul L. Beckett Graduate Fellowship ($1,000). Awarded by the Department of Political Science Second Place, Student Paper Competition. Western and Pacific Criminal Justice Educators Conference. Boise, Idaho November 5-8 1998. \u201cRestorative Justice: An Operational 34 Statement of Theory and Limited Test.\u201d(Selection by external professional referees). Outstanding Graduate Student 1997-1998 from Alpha Phi Sigma (Selection by Department Faculty Arkansas State University Instructor 2002- 2004 Assistant Professor 2004-present Fall 2004 Criminology 3813-01 Institutional Corrections Sociology 6513-01 Seminar in Corrections Criminology 4703 Supervised 6 internships in various agencies Summer 2004Criminology. 3193-01 Community Corrections Criminology. 3323-01 Juvenile Delinquency Criminology 4703 Supervised 8 internships in various agencies Spring 2004 Criminology 1023 Introduction to Criminal Justice (Instructor of record, but course was taught by Amanda Butts under my supervision) Criminology 3183 Institutional Corrections Criminology 3323 Juvenile Delinquency Fall 2003 Criminology 3193 Community Corrections Criminology 3323 Juvenile Delinquency Criminology 1023 Introduction to Criminal Justice Summer 2003 Criminology 3193 Community Corrections Criminology 3263 Criminology Spring 2003 Criminology 1023-01, 02 Introduction to Criminal Justice Criminology 3183 Institutional Corrections Fall 2002 Criminology 1023-01, 02 Introduction to Criminal Justice Criminology 3193 Community Corrections Washington State University Graduate Teaching Assistant 1998-2001 Independent sections Fall 2001 Criminal Justice 330- Crime Control Policies 35 Summer 2001 Criminal Justice 400M- Topics in Criminal Justice Summer 2000 Criminal Justice 424- Community Corrections The two summer courses were taught via the Washington Higher Education Telecommunication System (WHETS). This is a statewide system which allows delivery of university courses directly between electronic classrooms on campuses. The system is designed to be fully interactive with two-way video and audio allowing instructors to teach students simultaneously in various parts of the state. Through the use of video cameras, monitors, and voice activated microphones in the electronic classrooms, instructors see and hear students as they see and hear instructors. Spring 2000 Criminal Justice 101- Introduction to the Administration of Justice Fall 1999 Criminal Justice 101- Introduction to the Administration of Justice Spring 1999 Criminal Justice 365-Juvenile Justice and Corrections Fall 1998 Criminal Justice 365-Juvenile Justice and Corrections Support Graduate Teaching Assistant 1997-1998 Spring 1998- Criminal Justice 101- Introduction to the Administration of Justice Fall 1997- Criminal Justice 320- Criminal Law Grading Experience for the Extended Degree Program 1998-2001 (\u201cX\u201d indicates flex enrollment where students have 1 calendar year to complete the course. All other courses are semester based) Spring 1998-Summer 2000 Criminal Justice 101X- Introduction to Criminal Justice Spring 2000-Summer 2001 Political Science 340X- Public Administration Summer 2000- Redevelopment of Criminal Justice 101X with Bernadette Olson Fall 2000- Summer 2001- Criminal Justice 320 - Criminal Law Criminal Justice 330- Crime Control Policy Criminal Justice 405- Comparative Criminal Justice Criminal Justice/Women Studies 403- Violence Toward Women (co- graded with Bernadette Olson. Bernadette graded the written assignments while monitored the Speakeasy component of the web-based course. Duties included overseeing and interacting with students\u2019 postings on the web page) Guest Lecturer October 1996 Washington State University CrimJ 150 Lectured to undergraduate students about the dynamics of being a female in the criminal justice field and the importance of organizational theory and how it applies to the professional world. Book Reviews Summer 2000 Book review for Pearson Publications for an Introductory Text in Criminal Justice Summer 2003 Book review for Allyn Bacon Publishing for a Community Corrections Text January 2004 Book review for Allyn Bacon Publishing for a Community Corrections Text August 2004 Book review for Allyn Bacon Publishing for a Introduction to Corrections text 36 Peer Review of Journal Articles Reviewed article in Fall 2002 for Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology Reviewed article Spring 2003 for Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology Reviewed article Summer 2003 for Journal of Criminal Justice Reviewed article Spring 2004 for American Journal of Criminal Justice and Community and Restorative Justice Committee (CRJC): 2000-2001- $7,000 1999-2000- $5,000 1998-1999- $5,000 As a member of the evaluation team for the project for these years, my duties include, but are not limited to the following: collection, coding, entry, cleaning, and analysis of data, and co-authorship of quarterly evaluation reports. All evaluation reports are submitted to the Washington State Department of Corrections and the Washington State Law and Justice Advisory Council (the granting agency). Published Studies associated with CRJC: August 2001- 3 Year Evaluation Report: July 1, 2000-June 30, 2001. Co-authored With Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. June 2000- Fourth Quarter Evaluation Report: April 1, 2000-June 30, 2000. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. March 2000-Third Quarter Evaluation Report: January 1, 2000-March 30, 2000. Co-authored With Gregory Russell and Mike Erp. December 1999-Second Quarter Evaluation Report: October 1, 1999-December 31, 1999. Co- authored With Gregory Russell and Mike Erp. September 1999- First Quarter Evaluation Report: July 1, 1999-September 30, 1999. Co- authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. June 1999-Fourth Quarter Evaluation Report: April 1, 1999-June 30, 1999. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. March 1999-Third Quarter Evaluation Report: January 1, 1999-March 30, 1999. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. December 1998-Second Quarter Evaluation Report: October 1,1998-December, 30, 1998. Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. 37 September 1998- First Quarter Evaluation Report: July 1, 1998-September 30, 1998. Co- authored with Gregory D. Russell and Mike Erp. 1998. Ellen C. Lemley and Gregory D. Russell 3rd charges in Spokane County Data Analysis and System Design study presented to the Community Justice Committee in Spokane in preparation for a restorative justice grant application with the State of Washington. Other Evaluations: Evaluation of \u201cThe Guardian\u201d (a trigger lock devise for handguns) submitted to the Washington State Small Business Development Center- November 1998. Evaluation of an electronic monitoring devise submitted to the Washington State University Small Business Development Center- November 1997 \u201cImplementing by Groping Along Struggle in Program Evolutionary Implementation.\u201d Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Conference. November 15-18, 2000. San Francisco, CA. \u201cDesigning and Implementing an Adult Restorative Justice Program: Hopeful Beginnings and Bureaucratic Resistance.\u201d Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell. Paper presented at the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators. October 12-15, 2000, Sacramento \u201cDefining and Implementing Restorative Justice: An Analytical Perspective.\u201d Co-authored with Gregory D. Russell. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. March 9-14, 1999, Orlando, Florida. \u201cImplementing Restorative Justice: An Evaluation of Program Design Effectiveness in Decentralization Efforts.\u201d co-authored with Susan MacLachlan and Gregory D. Russell. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. March 11-14, 1998, Albuquerque, New Mexico. \u201cDesigning and Evaluating a Restorative Justice Demonstration Project.\u201d co-authored with Gregory D. Russell. Paper presented at the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators. November 5-8, 1998, Boise, Idaho. \u201cRestorative Justice: An Operational Statement of Theory and Proposed Limited Test.\u201d Paper presented at the Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators. November 5-8, 1998, Bosie, Idaho Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) 38 American Society of Criminology (ASC) Policy Studies Organization (PSO) American Society of Public Administration (ASPA) Western and Pacific Association of Criminal Justice Educators (WAPCJE) Washington Association of Criminal Justice Educators (WACJE) Honor Societies Alpha Phi Sigma- National Criminal Justice Honors Society Pi Sigma Alpha- National Political Science Honors Society 1998-2003: Chair of membership committee of the section on criminal justice administration (SCJA) of 2001- 2003:Executive Board Member of of 2001- present: Assistant Editor of \u201cThe Key\u201d. The newsletter of University: Arkansas State University Member of Search committee for an open position in criminology Faculty Advisor for the Criminology Club Spring 2004-fall 2004 Washington State University Graduate Student Association Faculty Meeting Representative, 2000-2001. Student Representative for the Applied Justice and Policy Studies Field on the Graduate Studies Committee, 1999-2000. Graduate and Professional Student Association Senator, 1997-1998. Community: Community Justice Diversion Program in Spokane -Oct. 1997-2002 As a member of the planning and implementation team of the Community Justice Committee in Spokane have been directly involved with the development of the Community and Restorative Justice Council (CRJC) project. The state of Washington, Department of Corrections, through the Washington State Law and Justice Committee (WSLJC), recently funded this project in the amount of $100,000 for 1998-1999 and 1999-2000. Of this, $5,000 has been set aside for evaluation for each year plans to submit a federal application to extend the project into the county (the current program only covers the city of Spokane). My activities on the committee include the following: design and implementation committee member, member of evaluation team, and co-Principle Investigator for an grant proposal 39 Butte County Probation Department November 1990-June 1997 Oroville 95965. Adult Intake Officer July 1996-June 1997. Investigation and preparing pre-sentence reports for the Court. Senior Counselor - Butte County Juvenile Hall Feb.1993-July 1996. Supervision of staff providing care and custody of minors detained in juvenile hall. Counselor-Butte County Juvenile Hall Nov. 1990-Feb.1993. Provide for the care and custody of minors detained at juvenile hall. Chico Police Department June - August 1992 Chico, CA. 95928. Student Intern Observation of and exposure to the every-day operations of the police department. 40 Doris, C. F. Chu P.O. Box 2003 State University 72467 (870) 972-3276 [email protected] INTEREST: Comparative Criminal Justice, Community Policing, Life-Course Explanations of Criminal Offending and Desistance, Reintegration of Ex-offenders State University of New York at Albany, Ph.D. in Criminal Justice May 2003 State University of New York at Albany, M.A. in Criminal Justice May 1999 Oklahoma City University, M.Ed. in Education August 1994 Central Police University, Taiwan, B.A. in Foreign Affairs June 1986 Albany School of Criminal Justice Teaching Assistantship Summer, 2002 Albany School of Criminal Justice Graduate Assistantship 2000, 2001, 2002 Albany School of Criminal Justice Fellowship 1999-2000 Albany Rockefeller College Student Assistantship 1998-1999 Central Police University, Taiwan Scholarship for the First Award in the Class 1984 41 Taipei Municipal Police Department (TMPD) Inspector 1986-1989 Chung Cheng Police Precinct Section Chief of Foreign Affairs Section 1989-1992 Song Sang Police Precinct Section Chief of Foreign Affairs Section 1992-1993 Taipei Municipal Police Department Senior Staff 1993-1997 Taipei Municipal Police Department Section Chief 1997-1998 at Taipei Municipal Police Department (TMPD) Distinguished Police Officer 1996 Taipei Municipal Police Department (TMPD) Graded highest (out of 110 people) in the annual employee evaluation at the Foreign Affairs Division of 1995 National Police Administration, Taiwan Placed first in the nationwide examination for selecting outstanding police officers for overseas study 1993 Executive Yuan (Cabinet) Outstanding Young Government Official Delegate to Germany 1992 Arkansas State University Assistant Professor Advisor of Criminology Club 1023: Introduction to 3263: Criminology 3383: Social Statistics Fall, 2003 till now Albany School of Criminal Justice Instructor 401: Crime, Deviation, and Conformity (Senior level undergraduate course) Summer, 2002 42 Albany School of Criminal Justice Teaching Assistant 496Z Community and Criminal Justice (Intensive writing, special topics course) Fall, 2001 Central Police University, Taiwan Part-time Lecturer: Special Topics on Policing (Seminar Class) 1997 Taiwan Police Academy Part-time Instructor: English (General course for freshman and sophomore) 1995, 1996 Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Government Research Assistant September 2000 to May 2003 Duties: - Assisting in youth courts to use a database management program YC) to track youth from arrest to final disposition - Maintaining web page of (website: - Assisting in designing a variety of questionnaires to examine satisfaction of guardians, youth court participants on youth court - Editing Help Screen and Tutorials of \u201cDo female officers respond to domestic violence differently from male officers?\u201d (with Ivan Sun) Paper to be presented at the American Society of Criminology, 2005 Comparison of Job-Related Attitudes of Chinese and American Female Police Officers\u201d (with Ivan Sun, and Hung-En Sung) Paper to be presented at the American Society of Criminology, 2005. \u201cCharismatic Evangelicals\u2019 War on Drugs: The Case of the Assemblies of God\u201d (with Hung-En Sung) Paper to be presented at the American Society of Criminology, 2005. \u201cChinese Immigrants\u2019 Perception toward the Police in the City of Toronto\u201d (with John Huey-Long Song, and Estelle Hofschneider) Paper to be presented at the American Society of Criminology, 2005. \u201cCommunity Policing in Taipei: Line Officers\u2019 Receptiveness to and Involvement in Community Policing.\u201d (with Terry Gingerich) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2005 Comparison of Attitudinal Differences between Chinese and American Police Supervisors.\u201d (with Ivan Sun) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2005. 43 \u201cWho is Stealing Your Money Cross-National Examination of an Skimming Crime.\u201d (with Yaw Ackah) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 2004. \u201cChinese Immigrants\u2019 Perception toward the Police in New York City.\u201d (with John Huey-Long Song, and John Dombrink) Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, 2004 Comparison of Job-Related Attitudes of Chinese and American Police Officers.\u201d (with Hung-En Sung, and Ivan Sun) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 2004. \u201cChinese Immigrants\u2019 Perception toward the Police in New York City and Los Angels Report of Preliminary Findings.\u201d (with John Huey-Long Song, and John Dombrink) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Asian Association of Police Studies, 2004. \u201cPolice Officers\u2019 Perception toward Community Policing Comparative Study of Police Officers in Taiwan and Washington State.\u201d (with Terry Gingerich) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2004. \u201cPolice Agency Accreditation and Its Relationship with Community Policing in Washington State Perspective from Street Cops to Management Cops.\u201d (with Terry Gingerich) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2004. \u201cCollateral Gains from the Military Cross-National Analysis of the Armed Forces- Crime Relationship.\u201d (with Hung-En Sung) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 2003. \u201cUnemployment, Income Inequality, and Crime Cross-National Analysis.\u201d (with Hung-En Sung) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 2003. \u201cFaith-Based Programs in Criminal Justice Practice\u201d (with Allison Anadi) Paper presented at the National Conference on Family Violence: Legal, Social, Economic and Psychological Implications, April 2003. \u201cAn Examination of Religiosity and Desistance.\u201d Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2003. \u201cAn Introduction to YC: Case Management Software to Youth Court.\u201d (with James F. Nelson and Jia Liu) Workshop presented at the Youth Court Conference 2002. \u201cAdding Religion to Hirschi\u2019s Social Control Theory\u201d (with Michael Cretacci) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 2000 \u201cDoes Participation in the Global Economy Reduce Political Corruption? An Empirical Inquiry\u201d (with Hung-En Sung): International Journal of Comparative Criminology, p. 94-118, 3(2), 2003. Book Chapter: \u201cPolice Forces and Correctional Systems of Taiwan, Republic of China\u201d (with Terry Gingerich) in World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems, 2005 (Gale Publication). Entry: \u201cBroken Windows Theory of Crime\u201d in the forthcoming Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Website. 44 under \u201cThe Mediating Effect of Economic Deprivation on Crime\u201d (with Ivan Sun and Hung-En Sung): Paper submitted to International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice \u201cCaregivers at Risk: the Implications of Health Disparities\u201d (with Loretta Brewer): Paper submitted to Stress, Trauma and Crisis: An International Journal-( Double Issue: Poverty, Mental Health, and Its Correlates) \u201cComparison of Job-Related Attitudes of Chinese and American Police Officers\u201d (with Ivan Sun): Paper submitted to Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management Comparison of Attitudinal Differences between Chinese and American Police Supervisors.\u201d (with Ivan Sun): Paper submitted to Police Quarter. \u201cChinese Immigrants\u2019 Perception toward the Police in New York City\u201d (with John Huey-Long Song, and John Dombrink) Paper submitted to International Criminal Justice Review. Work in Comparative Perspective of Community Policing in Taiwan and Washington State (with Terry Gingerich \u201cChinese Immigrants\u2019 Perception toward the Police in New York City\u201d; $2,500; Faculty Research Grant; Arkansas State University \u201cCharismatic Evangelicals\u2019 War on Drugs: The Case of the Assemblies of God\u201d (Co-investigator with Hung-En Sung); Louisville Institute \u201cReligiosity as Social Capital, in the Explanation of Desistance from Crime\u201d guest speaker at the National Conference on Family Violence: Legal, Social, Economic and Psychological Implications, April 2003 Skimming Crime\u201d keynote speaker at Altrusa International monthly meeting in Arkansas, February 17, 2005 Reviewer for Journal of Crime and Criminal Justice International Dr. Graeme Newman (Dissertation Chair) Distinguished Teaching Professor School of Criminal Justice State University of New York at Albany 223A Draper Hall 135 Western Ave Dr. David Duffee Professor School of Criminal Justice State University of New York at Albany Draper 225A 135 Western Ave. 45 Albany 12222 (518) 442-5223 e-mail: [email protected] Albany 12222 (518) 442-5224 e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Alan Lizotte (Dissertation Co-chair) Professor School of Criminal Justice State University of New York at Albany 207 Draper Hall 135 Western Ave Albany 12222 (518) 442-5227 e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Ivan Sun Assistant professor Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice University of Delaware Newark 19702 (302) 831-8727 e-mail: [email protected] 46 Lawrence Mark Salinger Arkansas State University Department of Criminology, Sociology, Social Work, and Geography 228 International Student Center P.O. Drawer 2410 State University, Arkansas 72467-2410 PHONE: 870-972-3705 FAX: 870-972-3694 E-Mail [email protected] 810 Amber Circle Bono, Arkansas 72416 HOME: 870-934-8081 FAX: 870-935-4072 CELL: 870-219-5271 Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 1992, Ph.D. in Sociology. Dissertation Title: Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Ninety-Nine Years of Federal Criminal Price-Fixing Cases, 1890-1988. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 1983, M.A. in Forensic Studies (Criminal Justice). Thesis Title: Assaults Against Flight Attendants Victimization Survey. University of California, Irvine, California, 1981, B.A. in Social Ecology - Criminal Justice Concentration Criminology Deviance 47 Criminal Justice Complex Organizations White-Collar and Corporate Crime Community Policing Geographic Information Systems Associate Professor, 1997-Present. Previously: Assistant Professor, 1992-1997; Instructor, 1990-1992. Assistant Chair, 2005-Present. Arkansas State University (Jonesboro, Arkansas), Department of Criminology, Sociology, and Geography. Courses: Introduction to Criminal Justice Police and Society Criminology Juvenile Delinquency Criminal Justice Systems (Capstone Policy-Oriented Course) Criminology Internships Principles of Sociology Methods of Social Research (Including SPSS/PC) Statistics (Including SPSS/PC) Social Deviance Geographic Information Systems for the Social Sciences Population and Demography Social Organization Graduate Seminar in Criminal Behavior: White-Collar Crime Graduate Seminar in Juvenile Delinquency Graduate Internship Instructor, 1987-1990. Adrian College (Adrian, Michigan), Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Courses: Principles of Sociology Social Problems and Contemporary Institutions Introduction to Social Research Introduction to Criminal Justice Criminology Delinquency Seminar: White-Collar and Corporate Crime The Police in Urban Society Prevention and Correction Social Deviance 48 Community Service Seminar Seminar: Substance Abuse Professional Internship Teaching Assistant II/Lecturer, 1983-1987. Washington State University (Pullman, Washington), Department of Sociology. Courses: Contemporary Social Problems Criminology Introduction to Sociology Juvenile Delinquency Quantitative Techniques in Sociology Associate Instructor, 1981-1983. Indiana University (Bloomington, Indiana), Department of Forensic Studies. Course: Etiology of Norm Violating Behavior Assistant Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Counselor, 1980-1981. Boy's Clubs of the Harbor Area (Newport Beach, California) while a volunteer in VISTA. Student Intern, 1979. Irvine (California) Police Department, Investigative Division (University of California, Irvine, Program in Social Ecology Field Study Program Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 2005. Encyclopedia of White-Collar and Corporate Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 2000. Annual Editions: Deviant Behavior 00/01. Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin Publishing Group Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 1999. Annual Editions: Deviant Behavior 99/00. Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin Publishing Group Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 1998. Annual Editions: Deviant Behavior 98/99. Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin Publishing Group. Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 1997. Annual Editions: Deviant Behavior 97/98. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group/Brown and Benchmark Publishers. Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 1996. Annual Editions: Deviant Behavior 96/97. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group/Brown and Benchmark Publishers. 49 Geis, Gilbert, Robert F. Meier, and Lawrence M. Salinger (Eds.). 1995. White-Collar Crime: Classic and Contemporary Views (Third Edition). New York: Free Press Salinger, Lawrence M. (Ed.). 2001. Special Issue on White-Collar and Corporate Crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Salinger, Lawrence M., Paul D. Jesilow, Henry N. Pontell, and Gilbert Geis. 1985. \"Assaults Against Flight Attendants Victimization Study.\" Transportation Journal 25:66-71. Pontell, Henry N., Lawrence M. Salinger and Gilbert Geis.1983. \"Assaults in the Air: Concerning Attacks Against Flight Attendants.\" Deviant Behavior 4:297-311 Gilbert Geis and Lawrence M. Salinger. 1998. \u201cAntitrust Law and Organizational Deviance.\u201d In: Research on the Sociology of Organizations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University R. Brinkley Smithers Institute for Alcohol-Related Workplace Studies Salinger, Lawrence M. 1999. Test Bank for American Delinquency, by: LaMar T. Empey and Mark C. Stafford. Belmont Thomson/Wadsworth Publishing Company Dison, Jack, Lawrence M. Salinger, and Kris Soto. 1995. Profile of Offenders: Arkansas Second Judicial District, 1993-1994. Prepared for the Intermediate Sanctions Cluster Group Salinger, Lawrence M. 2005. Review of Rethinking Corporate Crime, by James Gobert and Maurice Punch. Contemporary Sociology (Forthcoming). Salinger, Lawrence M. 1994. Review of Crime and its Social Context, by Terence D. Miethe and Robert F. Meier. Michigan Sociological Review (Fall 1994). 50 Salinger, Lawrence M. 1993. Review of White-Collar Crime in Modern England: Financial Fraud and Business Morality 1845-1929, by George Robb. The Criminologist (Spring/October 1993):17. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1990. Review of Corporate Corruption:The Abuse of Power, by Marshall B. Clinard. Michigan Sociological Review (Fall 1990):96-98 Jack Dison and Lawrence M. Salinger. 1995. \u201cIntermediate Sanctions Cluster Group.\u201d Arkansas Governor\u2019s Discretionary Fund, $7,000 Salinger, Lawrence M. 2002. \u201cUsing a Community Policing Survey as a Means for Teaching Applied Research.\u201d Southwestern Social Science Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. Salinger, Lawrence M. and Jack Dison. 1996. \u201cPredictors of Convictions in a Rural Arkansas Judicial District.\u201d American Society of Criminology, Chicago, Illinois. Dison, Jack and Lawrence M. Salinger. 1996. \u201cFelonies in the 2nd Judicial District of Arkansas: An Example of Applied Research.\u201d Southwestern Association of Criminal Justice Educators, Tucson, Arizona. Salinger, Lawrence Mark. 1994. \"Attitudes on Rape Survey of College Students at a Rural Southern University.\" American Society of Criminology, Miami, Florida. Salinger, Lawrence Mark and James F. Short, Jr. 1993. \"Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Ninety-Nine Years of Federal Price-Fixing Cases, 1890-1988 Test of the Stability of Punishment Hypothesis.\" American Society of Criminology, Phoenix, Arizona. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1992. \"Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Ninety-Nine Years of Federal Criminal Price-Fixing Cases, 1890-1988.\" American Society of Criminology, New Orleans, Louisiana. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1990. \"Price-Fixing Violations: The Last Century Re-visited.\" American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, Maryland. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1988. \"Applying Delinquency Theory to Practice Computer Generated Simulation.\" Michigan Sociological Association, Ypsilanti, Michigan. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1987. \"Conceptualizing and Measuring Corporate Crime: The Case of 51 Price-Fixing.\" Society for the Study of Social Problems, Chicago, Illinois. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1986. \"Truth or Consequences: Fraud in Scientific Research.\" American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, Georgia. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1983. Assaults Against Flight Attendants Victimization Survey.\" American Society of Criminology, Denver, Colorado. Jesilow, Paul D. and Lawrence M. Salinger. 1982. \"Violent White-Collar Crime: Some Considerations.\" Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky. Salinger, Lawrence M. 1982. \"Boy's Clubs of America Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Agency?\" Western Society of Criminology, Newport Beach, California. Pontell, Henry N., Lawrence M. Salinger, and Gilbert Geis. 1981. \"Assaults in the Air: Concerning Attacks Against Flight Attendants.\" American Sociological Association, Toronto, Canada Discussant. 2005. Gender and Society II. Southwestern Social Science Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. Panel Chair. 2004. Responsibility, Trust, and Misconduct in Corporate Settings. American Society of Criminology, Nashville, Tennessee. Panel Chair. 1996. Courts. American Society of Criminology, Chicago, Illinois. Session Organizer. 1995. \"Criminology I.\" Southwestern Sociological Association, Dallas, Texas. Panel Chair. 1994. \"Corporate Crime.\" American Society of Criminology, Miami, Florida. Session Organizer. 1993. \"On the Control and Regulation of White- Collar Crime.\" American Society of Criminology, Phoenix, Arizona. Organizer. 1989. Round Table: \"Directions in White-Collar and Corporate Crime: Where Have We Gone in the 1980s.\" Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia. Co-Organizer. 1988. Session: \"Communicating Sociology with Computers.\" Michigan Sociological Association, Ypsilanti, Michigan. Organizer and Discussant. 1988. Session: \"White-Collar and Corporate Crime.\" Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, San Francisco, California. 52 Discussant. 1988. Session: \"Sociology: Criminology and Criminal Justice.\" Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters Humanities, Saginaw, Michigan Member of the Graduate Student Information Committee. American Society of Criminology, 1996. Member of the Editorial Board. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1995-2002. Member of the Executive Board. Michigan Sociological Association, 1987-1990. Outstanding Teaching Awards Committee. Michigan Sociological Association, 1989. Manuscript Reviewer, Michigan Sociological Association, 1988-1990 Arkansas State University (Jonesboro, Arkansas). Committees Served On: Academic Hearing, 1993-1994, and 2002-2004 Faculty Senate, 1994-1996, 2003 Faculty Senate - Status of the Profession, 1993-1996 Chair, 1995-1996 General Education, 1998-2001 Interdisciplinary Family Studies, 2001-Present Institutional Review Board (Human Subjects), 1993-1995 Parking Appeals, 2002-2003 University Police Officer Screening, 1996-1998 Other University Service: Served as Arkansas State University Spokesman After the Westside Middle-School Shooting in Jonesboro, Arkansas, 1998. Adrian College (Adrian, Michigan). Committees Served On: Academic Advising and Career Development, 1988-1989 Academic Status Review, 1989-1990 Campus Environment, 1988-1989 College Environment, 1989-1990 Library and Learning Enrichment, 1988-1989 53 Parking, Lighting, and Security, 1988-1990 Adrian College (Adrian, Michigan), Faculty Advisor to Phi Kappa Sigma Fraternity, 1987-1989 Washington State University (Pullman, Washington). Committee Served On: Parking Appeals Committee, 1986-1987 Arkansas State University (Jonesboro, Arkansas). Committees Served On: Advisory and Planning, 1993-1997 Admissions and Credits, 1992-1994 Faculty Development Steering, 1992 Curriculum, 1998-2000 Pre-Law, 1992-1993 Harry S. Truman Scholarship Nominating, 1993-1994 Grievance Hearing, 1996-2001 Teaching and Learning Enhancement by Networking Technology, 1996-2001 Arkansas State University (Jonesboro, Arkansas). Committees Served On: Advising Recruitment, and Retention 1990-1995 Budget, 1996-Present Curriculum, 1992-1994, 1996-2001 Chair, 1998-2001 Graduate Studies, 1993-Present Promotion, Retention, and Tenure, 1998-2001, 2003-Present Library, 1990-2001, 2003-Present Chair, 1998-2001, 2003-Present R.E. Dozier Criminology Scholarship, 1990-1992 Department Chairperson Search, 1992-1993 Criminology Search, 1995, 1996 Social Work Search, 1996 54 Sociology Search, 1998 Faculty Assessment, 1992 Principles of Sociology Assessment, 1993 Other Departmental Service: Faculty Advisor - Student Criminal Justice Association, 1992-1998 Alumni Phonathon, 1993-1994 Member. 1998-Present. Community Oriented Policing Leadership Council. Jonesboro, Arkansas. Member. Law Enforcement Committee. Using to analyze crime patterns in Jonesboro, Arkansas. Chair. 1997-2000. Arkansas Department of Human Services Craighead County Transitional Employment Assistance Coalition Transportation Committee. Jonesboro, Arkansas. Co-Consultant. 1994-1997. Arkansas Second Judicial District Intermediate Sanctions Cluster Group. Co-Collected and analyzed data for a felony offender profile. Consultant. 1991. Arkansas State University Catholic Student Center Alumni Survey. Constructed, conducted, and analyzed survey of alumni members to determine the quality of previous programming, and to improve the quality of future programming Attended Kansas State University Continuing Education Academic Chairpersons Conference, February 7-11, Orlando, Florida. Attended Arkansas State University College of Business Ethics and Corporate Governance Seminar, October 1, 2004, Jonesboro, Arkansas. Attended ArcView Geographic Informations Systems Training Courses (Introductory), May 1999, St. Charles, Missouri. Attended MapInfo Professional Geographic Information Systems Training Courses (Introductory, Intermediate, and Advanced Levels), December 14-17, 1998, Chicago, IL. 55 Attended National Institute of Justice Crime Mapping Conference, December 10-12, 1998, Arlington, Virginia. Attended National Institute of Justice Community Policing Conference, November 8-10, 1998, Arlington, Virginia. Attended Four-Week Advanced Multimedia Instruction and Web-Building Course, June, 1998, Center for Learning Technology, Arkansas State University. Attended Four-Week Introductory Multimedia Instruction and Web-Building Course, June, 1997, Center for Learning Technology, Arkansas State University. Attended National Science Foundation Grant-Writing Workshop, March 11-12, 1993, Jackson, Mississippi. Attended On-Campus Workshops on Lotus 1-2-3, Networking, UNIX, E-Mail, and Internet, Summer, 1993, Arkansas State University. Attended National Teleconferences on Internet and Multimedia Computing, Fall, 1993, Arkansas State University Second Place in the Student Paper Competition of the Western Society of Criminology, 1982. Alpha Kappa Delta Sociology Honor Society Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences American Society of Criminology American Association of University Professors American Association of Political and Social Sciences International Association of Chiefs of Police Fraternal Order of Police, Jonesboro, Arkansas, Lodge Dr. Patricia Teddlie Dr. Jack Dison, Retired Arkansas State University Arkansas State University Department of Criminology, Sociology, Department of Criminology, Sociology, Social Work and Geography Social Work, and Geography P.O. Drawer 2410 P.O. Drawer 2410 State University, Arkansas 72467-2410 State University, Arkansas 72467-2410 870-972-3705 870-972-3705 Dr. Larry E. Clowers, Retired Dr. James F. Short, Jr., Professor Emeritus Arkansas State University Washington State University Department of Criminology, Sociology, Department of Sociology Social Work, and Geography 204 Wilson Hall P.O. Drawer 2410 Pullman, Washington 99164-4020 State University, Arkansas 72467-2410 509-335-4707 870-972-3705 Dr. Gilbert Geis, Professor Emeritus Dr. Robert Meier, Chair University of California, Irvine University of Nebraska, Omaha School of Social Ecology Department of Criminal Justice 970 Poppy Lane 6001 Dodge Street Corona Del Mar, California 92625 Omaha, Nebraska 68182 949-721-9401 402-554-2800 Dr. Richard McGhee, Retired Arkansas State University Department of English and Philosophy P.O. Drawer 1890 State University, Arkansas 72467-1890 870-972-4303 (Current May 18, 2005) Department of Criminology, Phone (870) 972-3705 Sociology, and Geography Fax (870) 972-3694 Arkansas State University Email [email protected] P.O. Box 2410 State University 72467 WIENKE, Ph.D. Current Position and affiliations 2001 to Present: Department of Sociology, Arkansas State University 2002: Assistant Professor Affiliations with Family Studies and Women and Gender Studies Areas of specialization Marriage and Family (esp. parenthood; fatherhood; personal well-being; intimate relationships; mate selection; and family policy) Sociology of Gender (esp. men\u2019s studies; gender movements; feminist theory) Sociology of Sexuality (esp. gendered sexuality; sex, technology and the body;sexual orientations) Qualitative Methodology Social Inequality (race, class, gender, sexual orientation) Cultural Sociology Education 2002 Ph.D. Sociology, University of Pittsburgh 2002 Ph.D. Certificate Women\u2019s Studies, University of Pittsburgh 2002 M.A. Certificate Cultural Studies, University of Pittsburgh 1996 M.A. Sociology, University of New Orleans 1992 B.A. Sociology/English, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale Courses offered Undergraduate: Arkansas State University, 2001-2005 Marriage & Family (8 terms) Today\u2019s Families: Interdisciplinary Approaches (2 terms) Intimate Relationships (2 terms) Childhood & Adolescence Principles of Sociology (3 terms) Graduate: Arkansas State University Seminar in the Family (2 terms) Qualitative Methods of Social Research Undergraduate: University of Pittsburgh, 1997-2001 Sociology of Family (2 terms) Sociology of Gender Youth and Society (2 terms) Society and the Child Sociology of Sport (2 terms) Social Problems (2 terms) Introduction to Sociology (2 terms) Undergraduate: University of Pittsburgh, 1996-1996 Courses assisted Sociology of Gender Societies Social Problems Undergraduate: University of New Orleans, 1995-1996. Statistics (2 terms) Research Assisted The Environmental Institute, University of New Orleans, 1995. Department of Sociology, University of New Orleans, 1994-1995. Publications Wienke, Chris. In Press. \u201cMale Sexuality, Medicalization, and the Marketing of Cialis and Levitra,\u201d Sexuality and Culture. Wienke, Chris. Forthcoming.\u201cSex the Natural Way: The Marketing of Cialis and Levitra.\u201d In Medicalized Masculinities. Edited by Dana Rosenfeld and Christopher Faircloth. Temple University Press. Wienke, Chris 2004. \u201cDebating of the Family.\u201d In Teaching About Families Collection of Essays, Syllabi, Projects, Assignments, Websites, and Bibliographies. Edited by Ginger Macheski, Kathleen Lowney, Michael Capece, Kate Warner, and Martha Laughlin. Washington, D.C.: American Sociology Association. Wienke, Chris. 2001. \u201cBoys\u2019 Bodies\u201d in Boyhood in America: An Encyclopedia. Edited by Jacqueline V. Lerner and Richard M. Lerner. Denver: ABC-CLIO. Wienke, Chris. 2000. \u201cBetter Loving through Chemistry: How New Impotence Treatment Technologies Promise to Change Male Sexuality\u201d Disclosure Journal of Social Theory 9: 69-93. Wienke, Chris. 1998. \u201cNegotiating the Male Body: Men, Masculinity, and Cultural Ideals\u201d The Journal of Men\u2019s Studies 6 (2): 255-282. Book Reviews Wienke, Chris. In Press. Book Review. The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. By Meika Loe. New York: New York University Press. Wienke, Chris. 2003. Book Review. Rumors of Indiscretion: The University of Missouri \u201cSex Questionnaire\u201d Scandal in the Jazz Age. By Lawrence J. Nelson. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press. In Arkansas Review Journal of Delta Studies 34 (3): 248-249. Works in progress Book Manuscript: \u201cMaking Responsible Fathers out of Troubled Men: Self-Change, Family Formation, and the U.S. Fatherhood Movement.\u201d Research Paper: \u201c(How) Does Sexual Orientation Affect Adult Well-Being?\u201d Research Paper: \u201cMate Selection Preferences of Divorced and Never-Married Adults in Personal Advertisements.\u201d Research Paper: \u201cTroubled Fathers and the Identity-Building Process in Two Fatherhood Service Programs.\u201d Conference Presentations \u201cSexual Orientation, Union Status, and Personal Well-Being Comparison of Attached and Unattached Heterosexuals and Homosexuals\u201d, Paper read at the Southwest Social Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 2005. (with Dr. Gretchen Hill) Does Sexual Orientation Affect Emotional Well-Being Comparison of Attached and Unattached Heterosexuals and Homosexuals, Paper read at the Midwest Sociological Society Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, April, 2005. (with Dr. Gretchen Hill) \u201cTroubled Fathers and the Identity-Building Process in Two Fatherhood Service Programs.\u201d Paper read at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, August 2003. \u201cMaking Responsible Fathers out of Troubled Fathers.\u201d Paper read at the American Men\u2019s Studies Association Annual Conference, Nashville, April 2003. \u201cUnderstanding Men\u2019s Involvement in Fathering Programs.\u201d Paper read at the Society for the Study of Social Problems Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, August 2002. \u201cFrom Crisis to Community: How Fathering Programs are Creating Haven in Heartless World.\u201d Paper read at the Southwest Social Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 2002. \u201cMaking Dads out of Men: Identity Construction and the U.S. Fatherhood Movement.\u201d Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, August 2001. \u201cBetter Loving through Chemistry: How New Impotence Treatment Technologies Promise to Change Male Sexuality.\u201d Paper read at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, August 1999. \u201cNegotiating the Male Body: Men, Masculinity, and Cultural Ideals.\u201d Paper read at the American Men\u2019s Studies Association Annual Conference, Nashville, March 1997. Cultural Stereotypes of the Male Body.\u201d Paper read at the Mid-South Sociological Association Annual Conference, Mobile, AL, October 1995. Invited Presentations \u201cSex the Natural Way: The Marketing of Cialis and Levitra.\u201d Paper presented at the Humanities and Social Science Brown Bag Lecture Series, Arkansas State University, December 2004. \u201cSex the Natural Way: The Marketing of Cialis and Levitra.\u201d Paper read at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, August 2004. \u201cMaking Responsible Fathers out of Troubled Fathers.\u201d Paper presented at the Division of Children and Family Services Area Meeting, Jonesboro, AR, June 2003. \u201cFrom Crisis to Community: How Fathering Programs are Creating Haven in Heartless World.\u201d Paper read at the Division of Children and Family Services Area Meeting, Jonesboro, AR, April 2002. Service to the Department and University Sexual Harassment Grievance Committee (2004-2006) Admissions and Credits Committee (2003\u2013 ) Coordinator for the Humanities and Social Sciences Brown Bag Lecture Series Faculty Review Committee (2005 \u2013 ) Interdisciplinary Child Welfare Committee (2001\u2013 ) Budget Committee (2003\u2013 ) Library Committee (2003\u2013 ) Graduate Curriculum Committee (2001-2003) Hiring Committee (2001) Awards Scholarly Activity Initiative Award, Arkansas State University, 2005-2006 Tuition Scholarship, University of Pittsburgh, 2000-2002. Women\u2019s Studies Research Fund Award, University of Pittsburgh, Summer 2000. Andrew Mellon Predoctoral Fellowship alternate, University of Pittsburgh, 2000-2001. Teaching Fellowship, Department of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh, 1996-2000. Graduate Research Assistantship, Department of Sociology, University of New Orleans, 1994-1996. Professional Organizations American Sociological Association (ASA) Society for the Study of Social Problems (SSSP) Southwest Social Science Association (SSSA) Midwest Sociological Society (MSS) American Men\u2019s Studies Association (AMSA) National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) Journal Referee Journal of Men\u2019s Studies (2002\u2013) Men and Masculinities (2004\u2013) Andrew Knight P.O. Box 3443; State University 72467 Telephone (870) 933-6811; E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION: 1998-2002 The Pennsylvania State University (PhD in Rural Sociology) Dissertation: Afraid of Food? An Integrative Approach to Risk Perception 1992-1994 University of Western Ontario (Master of Arts in Sociology) Master\u2019s Thesis: Environmental Movement and Social Movement Theory 1987-1992 University of New Brunswick (Bachelor of Arts, Honors in Sociology) Honors\u2019 Paper: Third World Development and Foreign Aid EXPERIENCE: June 2005- Visiting Research Associate, National Food Safety and Toxicology Center June 2006 Michigan State University, East Lansing August 2002- Assistant Professor of Sociology, Arkansas State University, State University Present Department of Criminology, Sociology and Geography Sept. 2001- Thoreau Fellow, University of Maine, Orono July 2002 Department of Sociology Aug. 2000- Instructor, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dec. 2000 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Aug. 1998- Research Assistant, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park July 2001 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Sept. 1996 - Instructor, Mount Royal College, Calgary (Canada) April 1998 Department of Anthropology and Sociology Jan. 1998 - Instructor, Canadian Nazarene College, Calgary (Canada) April 1998 INTERESTS: Agriculture; Community; Environment; Methods; Rural Sociology; Science & Technology; Social Movements; Sustainable Development; Statistics; Theory OFFERED/TAUGHT: Undergraduate Graduate Soc 2213: Principles of Sociology (General Education and Honors) Soc 5253: Rural Sociology Soc 4243: Social Theory Soc 5363: Environmental Sociology Soc 4253: Rural Sociology Soc 6303: Contemporary Sociological Theory Soc 4323: Applied Research Soc 4363: Environmental Sociology 4373: Sustainable Development in Modern Society Soc 101: Intro. to Sociology Soc 240: Technology and Society Soc 340: Sustainable Development in Modern Society Rsoc 011: Introduction to Rural Sociology 2201: Introductory Sociology 2203: Current Social Issues Introductory Sociology INTERESTS: Agriculture; Community; Development; Energy; Environment; Homeland Security; Policy Evaluation; Risk Perception; Science & Technology EXPERIENCE: \u00b0Grants and Funded research: 2004 Perceptions, Management and Regulatory Enforcement of Agricultural Genetic Engineering Arkansas Biosciences Institute, Co-principal investigator, $100,000 Local Business Survey Jonesboro Chamber of Commerce, Co-principal investigator, $8,940 2003 Social Assessment of Plant-Made Pharmaceuticals Arkansas Biosciences Institute, Co-principal investigator, $250,000 Tobacco Awareness and Public Policy Arkansas Tobacco Free Coalition, Co-principal investigator, $26,500 \u00b0Other research: 2004 Educational Reforms, Environmental, Health, and Homeland Security Risks Survey, Co- principal investigator 2003 Quality of Life Survey of Jonesboro Residents,Co-principal investigator ARTICLES: Knight, Andrew and Rex Warland. 2005. \u201cDeterminants of Food Risks Multi-Approach Model.\u201d Rural Sociology 70 (September). Knight, Andrew and Rex Warland. 2004. \u201cUnderstanding the Relationship Between Socio- Demographics and Concern About Food Safety Issues.\u201d Journal of Consumer Affairs 38, 1: 107- 120. Stewart, Patrick and Andrew Knight. Forthcoming. \u201cTrends Affecting the Next Generation of U.S. Agricultural Biotechnology: Politics, Policy and Plant Made Pharmaceuticals.\u201d Technological Forecasting & Social Change CHAPTERS: Knight, Andrew. 2006. \u201cSupersizing Farms: The McDonaldization of Agriculture.\u201d Pp. ???-??? in McDonaldization: The Reader, edited by G. Ritzer. Knight, Andrew and Drew Hyman. 2001. \u201cCitizen Participation in Political Decision Making Comparison of Deliberative Forums and Public Hearings.\u201d Pp. 113-131 in Rising Tide: Community Development Tools, Models, and Processes, edited by D. Bruce and G. Lister. Sackville (Canada): Rural & Small Town Programme COMMUNIQUES: Knight, Andrew. 2005. \u201cAlert Status Red: Awareness, Knowledge and Reaction to the Homeland Security Threat Advisory System.\u201d Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2 ( REVIEW: Knight, Andrew. \u201cBiotechnology and the Risk Society.\u201d Revise & Resubmit Society and Natural Resources. Knight, Andrew. \u201cRevising Cultural Theory: The Significance of Worldviews.\u201d Knight, Andrew and Drew Hyman. \u201cDeliberative Democracy and Representation: Comparing the Views of Public Issues Forum Attendees With Those of the Broader Public PROGRESS: Knight, Andrew. \u201cBenefits and Morality: An Examination of Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology Applications.\u201d Knight, Andrew. \u201cScience Fiction Social-Construction Analysis of Molecular Farming Regulations in Canada.\u201d Knight, Andrew. \u201cDifferences Between Perceived Knowledge and Objective Knowledge Measures in Perceptions of Biotechnology Applications.\u201d Knight, Andrew. \u201cThe Knowledge Gap: What Consumers Know and Think They Know About Biotechnology.\u201d Knight, Andrew. \u201cAesthetics, Values, and Support for Endangered Species.\u201d Knight, Andrew. Understanding Risk Perception. Book Manuscript. Knight, Andrew. Cheap Food at What Cost? The Hidden Risks Associated With Industrial Agriculture. Book Manuscript REVIEWS: Forthcoming. Review of Bronx Ecology: Blueprint for a New Environmentalism, by Allen Hershkowitz, Journal of Community Development Society. (Book Reviews continued) 2005. Review of Community, Democracy and the Environment: Learning to Share the Future, by Jane A. Grant, Environmental Practice 7(1): March. Review of Coal Human History, by Barbara Freese, submitted to Journal of Environment and Development PUBLICATIONS/REPORTS: 2004 McLean, William, Patrick A. Stewart, and Andrew Knight. Jonesboro Regional Chamber of Commerce Survey. Report submitted to Jonesboro Regional Chamber of Commerce. 2003 McLean, William, Andrew Knight, Patrick A. Stewart, Aaron Bolin, and David Saarnio. Survey Results on Tobacco Use, Attitudes, and Public Policies in Craighead County. Report Presented to Tobacco Free Coalition. 2002 Knight, Andrew. 2002. Afraid of Food? An Integrative Approach to Risk Perception. Dissertation. 1997 Salary figures of Alberta promotional materials. 1994 Knight, Andrew. 1994. Social Movement Theory and Environmentalism: An Exploration of the Resource Mobilization Perspective, the New Social Movement Theory and the Modern Environmental Movement in Canada, Britain and France. Master\u2019s thesis. 1992 Knight, Andrew. Foreign Aid\u2019s Role in Third World Development. Honors\u2019 paper PRESENTATIONS: 2005 Invited panelist on stakeholder issues with plant-made products. Conference on Plant-made Pharmaceuticals. Montreal, QC. January 30-February 2, 2005. Knight, Andrew. \u201cCoyote Ugly? Aesthetics, Affect, and Support for Endangered Species.\u201d To be presented at the Southern Sociological Society Annual Meeting. Charlotte, N.C. April 13-16, 2005. 2004 Knight, Andrew. \u201cRevising Cultural Theory: The Significance of Worldviews.\u201d Presented at Society for Risk Analysis Annual Conference. Palm Springs, CA. December 5-8, 2004. Knight, Andrew. \u201cThe Knowledge Gap: What People Know about Biotechnology.\u201d Presented at Agricultural, Food, & Human Values Society\u2019s Annual Conference. Hyde Park, NY. June 10-13, 2004. 2003 Knight, Andrew. \u201cScience Fiction? An Analysis of Plant Molecular Farming Regulations in Canada.\u201d Presented at Association for Politics and Life Sciences Annual Conference. Philadelphia, PA. August 28-31, 2003. Knight, Andrew. \u201cSupersizing Farms: The McDonaldization of Agriculture.\u201d Presented at the Arkansas Sociological Association 2003 Conference. Arkadelphia, AR. October 17, 2003. Knight, Andrew and Patrick Stewart. \u201cRegulating Biopharmaceuticals: Implications for Farmers.\u201d Presented at Rural Sociology Society Annual Conference. Montreal, PQ. July 27- 30, 2003. Stewart, Patrick and Andrew Knight. \"Fear versus Hope: The Environmental and Health Implications of Plant Made Pharmaceuticals.\" Presented at Association for Politics and Life Sciences Annual Conference. Philadelphia, PA. August 28-31, 2003. 2001 Knight, Andrew, Rex Warland and Robert O. Herrmann. \u201cDeterminants of Food Risks Multi-Approach Model.\u201d Presented at Rural Sociology Society Annual Conference. Albuquerque, NM. August 15-19, 2001. 2000 Knight, Andrew and Drew Hyman. \u201cCitizen Participation in Political Decision Making Comparison of Deliberative Forums and Public Hearings.\u201d Presented at Community Development Society Annual Conference. Saint John, NB. July, 2000 REVIEWER: Risk Analysis, Rural Sociology REVIEWER: Oklahoma Water Research Resources Institute EXPERIENCE: Feb. 1997 - Contract Researcher, ResearchWorks Inc. Dec. 1997 Calgary (Canada) April 1996 - Sept. 1996 \u00b0Duties included: writing proposals and reports; designed, pre-tested, and analyzed survey results; in-person and telephone interviews; on-line database searches and library research; focus group consultations; mystery shopping. \u00b0Completed projects included: feasibility studies, customer satisfaction studies, profile studies, program evaluation, salary surveys, employee surveys, membership surveys, and advertising evaluation. \u00b0Client list included: City of Calgary, transportation companies, tourism companies, manufacturing companies, land developers, non-profit organizations, professional associations, advertising agencies, communication companies, and service industries. Oct. 1997 - Contract Researcher, Aspen Market Research Services Dec. 1997 Calgary (Canada) Aug. 1996 - Sept. 1996 \u00b0Duties included: database set-up and management; writing reports; statistical analysis; \u00b0Completed projects included: internal survey on privatization of services, employee surveys, communication survey, focus group research. \u00b0Client list included: health services, international oil & gas companies, educational institutions, international telecommunications company, and national law firm. Oct. 1996 - Project Manager, Haines Elliott Marketing Services Inc. Jan. 1997 Calgary (Canada) \u00b0Duties included: overseeing and coordinating various market research projects; statistical analysis and market segmentation; survey design; proposal and report writing; focus group organization. \u00b0 Completed projects included: membership surveys, public opinion polls, program evaluation, mystery shopping, customer surveys, feasibility studies, and usage studies. \u00b0Client list included: Calgary Chamber of Commerce, professional associations, City of Calgary, educational institutions, food industries, political parties, and individual clients. Sept. 1996 & Contract Researcher, Inventure Management Limited Oct. 1997 Calgary (Canada) \u00b0Completed content analysis report of competitor advertising and promotional materials for international telecommunications company. \u00b0Data entry and preliminary analysis of study through Aspen Market Research Services Inc SERVICE: University: 2003-2005 University Bioscience Safety Committee 2004 University Honors Scholarship Competition Panel 2003 Moderator for Undergraduate Scholar\u2019s Day 2002 Arkansas Biosciences Committee. College: 2003-2005 Honors Advisory Committee 2003 Co-group leader, Honors trip to St. Louis. Department: 2003-2005 Department Evaluation Committee, Chair Department Technology Committee Department Undergraduate Curriculum Committee Department Graduate Curriculum Committee 2002-2005 Sociology Graduate Committee 2002-2003 Search committee for criminology position. Community: 2003-2004 Craighead County Literacy League DEVELOPMENT: 2004 National Science Foundation Workshop (ASU) 2003 Writing Research Proposals Workshop (ASU) 2002 Managing Grants Workshop (ASU) Advisor Training (ASU) Coping With Challenging Behaviors in the Classroom Workshop (UMO) Mentoring Students in a Research Environment Workshop (UMO) 2001 Research Grants Workshop (David G. Bauer) (UMO) Teaching for Social Involvement (UMO) Tips for Effective Syllabus Construction (UMO) (Professional Development Continued) 1999 The Penn State Course in College Teaching (PSU) 1997 Effective Teaching Techniques Seminar (MRC) Assessing Learning Seminar (MRC) Chairing Effective Meetings Seminar (MRC) Great Ideas for Teaching Students Seminar (MRC) Curriculum Perspectives Seminar (MRC) Classroom Culture and the Changing Student Seminar (MRC) Conflict Resolution: Interest Based Problem Solving Seminar 2004 Bare, Alison. \u201cAesthetics and Perceptions of Endangered Species.\u201d Chair, Honors senior thesis committee. Parks, Kelli. \u201cAthletes Views of Campus Life.\u201d Member Honors senior thesis committee. 2003 Dover, Michelle. \u201cPerceptions of Rape Myths Among Fraternities and Sororities.\u201d Chair, Honors senior thesis committee EXPERIENCE: 2003-2005 Center for Social Research \u2022 Manage budget and operation of 13 station telephone survey lab 2002-2005 Student advising for sociology majors. MEDIA/PUBLICITY: 2004 Blomeley, Seth. 2004. \u201cLake View Ruling Wrong, State Poll Says.\u201d Arkansas Democrat Gazette, April 28, 1A & 10A. KAIT8. Segment and interview on state educational reforms survey, April 28. \u201cTell Us How You Really Feel: The Center for Social Research Gets an Earful\u2014Gladly.\u201d Foundation News, Spring 2004: 10-11. Mortiz, Rick. 2004. \u201cPoll: Arkansas split on consolidation.\u201d Jonesboro Sun, April 28, 13A. KAIT8. Segment and interview on Center for Social Research, January 12. Pruitt, Sherry. 2004 program dials into funds to create opinion polling site.\u201d The Jonesboro Sun, January 9, 12A-13A. 2003 KAIT8. Segment and interview on results from Jonesboro Quality of Life Study on evening news, December 1. Pruitt, Sherry F. 2003. \u201cLocal study shows residents support public transit idea.\u201d The Jonesboro Sun, December 2, 10A and 11A. McBride, Linda. 2003. \u201cSurvey reveals opinions about Jonesboro.\u201d The Herald, December 4, 1 and 4. Pruitt, Sherry F. 2003 Professors Plan Biotechnology Study.\u201d The Jonesboro Sun, July 10, 1A and 2A. AFFILIATIONS: 2002- Environmental Sciences PhD Program, Arkansas State University 2005 Honors Program, Arkansas State University ASSOCIATIONS/ACTIVITIES: 2005 Agriculture & Human Values Society 2005 Society for Risk Analysis 1998-2005 Rural Sociological Society 2000-2005 Community Development Society 2003-2005 Southern Sociological Society 2004 Canadian Public Policy 2003-2004 Association for Politics and Life Sciences 2003-2004 Drug Information Association. AWARDS: 2000 Community Development Society Travel Award (PSU) 1992-1994 Teaching Assistantship (UWO) 1992-1993 Special University Scholarship (UWO) 1992 Admissions Scholarship 1992 (UWO) 1991-1992 Special Undergraduate Scholarship (UNB) 1990-1991 Richard Laurence Weldon Memorial Scholarship (UNB) 1990-1992 Dean's List 2/05 1709 Crepe Myrtle Drive Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401 Home Telephone (870) 935-8343 Work Telephone (870) 972-3048 Electronic Mail: [email protected] Education and Related Achievements The University of Georgia Doctor of Public Administration, August 1995. Fields of Study: Public Budgeting and Finance, Public Policy, Public Administration. Dissertation: \"The Line-Item Veto in Southern States.\" Carl Vinson Institute of Government Graduate Research Assistantship, 1992-95. University-wide Graduate School Assistantship & Supplemental Stipend, 1989-92. The University of Memphis (formerly Memphis State University) Master of Public Administration, 1989. Concentration: general public administration. Thesis: \"The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in Manufacturing on the Economic Health of Rural Tennessee Counties.\" Part-Time Master's Fellowship, 1988-1989. Rhodes College (formerly Southwestern at Memphis) Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, 1984. Emphasis: public policy studies and research. Honors Scholarship, 1980-84. Publications Watson, Douglas J. and Reese, Catherine C. \u201cThe Role of Human Resource Professionals in the Budgeting Process.\u201d Chapter 32 in Handbook of Practical Human Resource Management. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., December 2004, pages 754-775. Reese, Catherine C. \u201cAn Analysis of Reasons for the Use of the Line-Item Veto in Southern States.\u201d Politics and Policy 32(4), December 2004, pages 614-635. Stewart, Patrick A.; Reese, Catherine C.; and Brewer, Jeremy. \u201cEffects of Prohibition in Arkansas Counties.\u201d Politics and Policy 32(4), December 2004, pages 595-613. Publications, cont. Reese, Catherine C. and Coe, Charles K. \u201c Budgeting Essentials for Human Resource Managers,\u201d Chapter 26 in Handbook of Practical Human Resource Management (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Inc., Summer 1998), pages 536-558. Reese, Catherine C. \u201cThe Line-Item Veto in Practice in Ten Southern States,\u201d Public Administration Review (November/December 1997), pages 510-516. Grant Work Arkansas Employment Security Department, Employment and Training Services Division. Primary Investigator, May-September 2001. Drafted grant proposal, secured $80,000 funding. Directed the monitoring of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and Welfare-to- Work (WtW) programs for five (out of ten) federally-designated Local Workforce Investment Areas (LWIAs) for the State of Arkansas, for compliance with federal and state laws, policies and procedures. Directed all human resources, budgeting, and other administrative activities, including selecting and training personnel, overseeing the researching of current federal and state laws, overseeing the preparation of employee reimbursements and monitoring all field activities. Arkansas Employment Security Department, Employment and Training Services Division. Co-Primary Investigator, with John S. Kaminarides of the College of Business at Arkansas State University, January - November, 2000. Drafted grant proposal, secured $140,000 funding. Phase I: directed the monitoring of Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and Welfare-to-Work (WtW) programs for seven (out of ten) federally-designated Service Delivery Areas (SDAs) for the State of Arkansas, for compliance with federal and state laws, policies and procedures (completed September 21, 2000). Phase II: Directed the evaluation of the effectiveness of Arkansas\u2019 WtW program, via surveying WtW program managers, former and current WtW participants, and employers of WtW participants (completed November 30, 2000). My administration of this grant included overseeing all budgeting, personnel, and communications related to grant activities throughout the duration of the grant. Dean\u2019s Professional Development Grant to attend the Government Finance Officers Association Meeting as a Delegate, in May 1999. Consulting Activities Arkansas Public Administration Consortium (APAC). Co-Instructor, with Mike Stormes, State Budget Director, for \u201cThe Budget Process\u201d workshop for APAC\u2019s Certified Public Manager Program, November 2001. Developed and implemented a one-day seminar for mid- level state and local government professionals on the theory and practice of public sector budgeting. Condrey & Associates, Inc Human Resources Consulting Firm for State & Local Governments. Consultant, August 2001. Conducted interviews and assisted with overall position classification for the personnel of the City of North Little Rock, AR. Consultant, April 2003. Conducted interviews and assisted with overall position classification for the personnel of the City of Jonesboro, AR. Work Experience Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science. Associate Professor of Public Administration, August 2002-present. Assistant Professor of Public Administration, August 1997-May 2002. Teaching graduate classes in Public Budgeting and Finance, Human Resources Administration, Administrative Behavior, and Intergovernmental Relations to M.P.A. students; upper-division undergraduate courses in Public Personnel Management, Public Budgeting Processes, State & Local Government, and State Government to Political Science majors; and undergraduate courses in Introduction to U.S. Government. New Mexico State University, Department of Government. Assistant Professor of Government, August 1995 - May 1997. Taught graduate courses in Public Budgeting, Public Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations to M.P.A. students; upper-division courses in State and Local Government and Municipal Government; and undergraduate courses in American Government. The University of Georgia Carl Vinson Institute of Government, Human Services Division. Educational Program Assistant, 1995; Graduate Research Assistant, 1989-1994. Assisted with the overall management of human resource management projects, including classification and compensation studies, performance-based pay systems, job-based performance appraisal systems, and related employee training sessions. Participated in various research projects, including the collection and analysis of survey data and design of personnel- related research. Assisted with the teaching of a graduate-level seminar in public personnel administration. The University of Georgia, Department of Political Science. Graduate Research Assistant, 1989-1992. Performed a variety of research, data analysis, editing, and teaching assistance tasks for two public budgeting and finance professors. Tennessee Department of Human Services, Memphis, TN. Human Services Eligibility Counselor, 1984-1989. Monitored and redetermined eligibility for and food stamp cases. Received exceptional performance ratings, 1985-1989. Member of Victory Advisory Committee, 1988. Member of the Department of Employment Security's Cultural Exchange Program, 1986. Unit representative to the Shelby County Employee Council, 1985-1989. Recording Secretary for Employee Council, 1988-89. Papers, Presentations & Other Conference Activities Author and presenter of research, \u201cWelfare Reform in Arkansas: The Importance of Inter- Agency Communication,\u201d at the American Society for Public Administration national conference in Phoenix, AZ, March 2002. Section Chair, \u201cPublic Administration and Policy,\u201d for the Arkansas Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Jonesboro, AR, February 2002. Duties include soliciting, organizing and assisting with the scheduling of papers and panels. Author and presenter of research, \u201cImplementation of the Welfare-to-Work Program in Arkansas,\u201d at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Baton Rouge, LA, October 2001. Co-author and presenter of research, \u201cAlcohol Policy in Arkansas: Drinking in The Natural State,\u201d with Patrick A. Stewart and Jeremy Brewer, at the Arkansas Political Science Association Meeting, February 2001. Co-author of research, \u201cWet, Damp and Dry Study of Arkansas Counties and Alcohol-Related Crashes,\u201d with Jeremy Brewer and Patrick A. Stewart, at the Illinois Political Science Association Meeting, November 2000. Author and presenter of research, \u201cAn Analysis of Reasons for the Use of the Line-Item Veto in Southern States,\u201d at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Miami, Florida, October 1999. Author and presenter of research, \u201cThe Line-Item Veto in Practice in Ten Southern States,\u201d at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Miami, Florida, October 1996. Papers, Presentations and Other Conference Activities, cont. Co-author and co-presenter of research, \"Implementing Federal Mandates in Times of Fiscal Stress: The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,\" with Stephen E. Condrey, at the Cutback and Change Management Conference in Honolulu, Hawaii, October 1994. Co-author and presenter of research, \"The Line-Item Veto in Georgia: Incidence and Fiscal Effects,\" with Thomas P. Lauth, at the Georgia Political Science Association Conference in Savannah, Georgia, February 1993. Discussant for panel, \"Privatizing Pay Administration: Implementation of Merit-Based Compensation Systems in the Public Sector,\" at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Montgomery, Alabama, October 1992. Author and presenter of research, \"U.S. State Debt Issuance Mix: The Demise of General Obligation Issuance?\" at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Charlotte, North Carolina, October 1991. Presenter of research, \"Qualitative vs. Quantitative Performance Standards: Implications for Managerial Appraisal Systems,\" for Stephen E. Condrey, at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Charlotte, North Carolina, October 1991. Author and presenter of research Review of the Literature on Economic Recovery Following Disasters in the U.S.,\" at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Clearwater Beach, Florida, October 1990. Participant for panel, \"Women in Government: Beyond the Glass Ceiling?\" at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Clearwater Beach, Florida, October 1990. Participant for panel, \"Foreign Direct Investment in Poor Areas of the Advanced Industrial Countries,\" at the Convention of the International Studies Association in London, March 1989. Co-author and presenter of research, \"Foreign Direct Investment: The Impact on Social Services and Human Resources,\" with Ellen Rosell, at the Western Social Sciences Association meeting in Denver, Colorado, April 1988. Courses Taught Graduate (MPA) Courses Public Budgeting and Finance Seminar in Human Resources Management Administrative Behavior Public Budgeting Public Financial Management Intergovernmental Relations Upper-Division Undergraduate Courses State and Local Government Public Budgeting Process Public Personnel Administration Urban Politics State Government Lower-Division Undergraduate Courses Introduction to United States Government Professional Manuscript Reviewing Service Activities Reviewer/referee of journal articles at the request of The American Review of Public Administration, 1999 - present. Reviewer/referee of journal article at the request of the Public Performance and Management Review, 2002. Reviewer/referee of journal articles at the request of the International Journal of Public Administration (Jack Pinkowski, ed.) for symposia under Theme #1: \u201cDevelopments in State and Local Finance,\u201d 2001-2003. Reviewer/referee of journal articles for the academic year at the request of the Midsouth Political Science Review, 1998-2000. Reviewer/referee of journal articles for the academic year at the request of the Social Science Journal, 1997-1998. Reviewer/referee of journal articles at the request of the Public Administration Review, 1996. University and Community Service Activities Member of the Departmental Promotion and Tenure Review Committee, 2001-2005. Chair, 2002-2005. Member of the Arts and Humanities Dean Search Committee, 2002-2003. Co-Chair of the Faculty Search Committee, 2002. Member of the Heritage Studies Ph.D. Program Committee, 2001-present. Duties include assisting with decisions on admissions, graduate assistantships, course proposals, and program policies. Representative for the Arkansas Public Administration Consortium (APAC) at the Arkansas City Managers Association conference in Bella Vista, AR, November 2000. Presented scholarship awards on behalf of to students from and UALR. Faculty advisor/initiator, Arkansas State University Chapter of Pi Alpha Alpha, The National Honor Society for Public Affairs and Administration, 1998 - present. Coordinator/discussant for panel, \u201cWomen and the Blues,\u201d for the Delta Blues Symposium, at the Delta Blues Symposium, Jonesboro, Arkansas, April 2000. Member of the Advisory Committee for the Grant in support of the Governor\u2019s Partnership for Families and Children, 1999 - present. Member of the Student Grievance Committee for the College of Arts and Sciences, 1999 - 2002. Member of the General Education Committee for ASU, including the Sub-Committee on Outcomes Assessment, 1999. Volunteer member of the Delta Studies Symposium Committee at ASU, 1997 - 2002. Author of Environmental Policy Processes course proposal, 1998; reviewer of Ph.D. applications for the Environmental Sciences program, 1997 - 1998. Reviewer/judge for the New Mexico Municipal League to award Quality of Service recognition to local governments throughout the state, Summer 1996. Faculty advisor/initiator, New Mexico State University Chapter of Pi Alpha Alpha, 1996-1997. Continuing Education Government Finance Officers Association Annual Conference delegate, May 1999, Nashville, Tennessee. New Media in the Classroom Workshop participant, January 1998, Arkansas State University. Writing Across the Curriculum seminar participant, May 1997, New Mexico State University. Other Achievements Nomination for Board of Trustees Faculty Achievement Award for Teaching by Department of Political Science, 2002. Outstanding Young Woman of America Award, 1997. Who\u2019s Who in the South and Southwest, 1997. Other Achievements, cont. Nomination for Best Graduate Student Paper Award for the Section on Budgeting and Financial Management, 1992. Best Student Paper 1991 Award at the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration in Charlotte, North Carolina, 1991. United States Presidential Management Internship Program Finalist, 1989 (deferred). Award for Productivity Improvement Suggestion, Tennessee Department of Human Services, 1988. Membership in Professional Organizations American Society for Public Administration & Association on Budgeting and Financial Management. & Section on Personnel Administration and Labor Relations. & State of Arkansas Chapter. Membership in Professional Organizations Government Finance Officers Association. Pi Alpha Alpha (National Honor Society for Public Affairs and Administration) Initiator/Faculty Sponsor of Arkansas State University chapter, 1999 - present. Co-Initiator/Faculty Sponsor of New Mexico State University chapter, 1997. President of Memphis State University chapter, 1988-89. Arkansas Political Science Association Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science (198 7)--University of Georgia Specialties: Methodology/Statistics, American Government, Public Law, Political Philosophy Master of Public Administration (1980)--University of Georgia Specialties: Statistics, Criminal Justice Bachelor of Arts (1964)\u2014-Marquette University Major: Philosophy Academic Associate Professor, Political Science Department, Arkansas State University, 1991- Present Assistant Professor, Political Science Department, Arkansas State University, 1987-1991 Assistant/Associate Professor (Adjunct), Political Science Department, Rhodes College, various years Instructor, Political Science Department, Arkansas State University, 1984-1987 Instructor, Political Science Department, University of Mississippi, 1983-1984 Teaching and Research Assistantships, Political Science Department, University of Georgia, 1979-1983 Research Assistant, Survey Research Center, University of Georgia, 1981-1983 Research Assistant, Institute of Government, University of Georgia, 1979-1981 Nonacademic Owner, Electoral Geodemographics, 1999-Present: Providing redistricting services to state and local government, expert witness services to counsel in redistricting actions, and election services to candidates for state and local positions. Partner, Landmark Associates, Jonesboro, AR, 1987-1991: Providing campaign services to state and local candidates. Superintendent, Georgia Industrial Institute, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Alto, GA, 1973-1979: Supervise, coordinate, and bear responsibility for all activities of a highly complex, 1200 man adult maximum security correctional institution rurally located on 1000 acres and with a staff of 350. Superintendent, Georgia Training and Development Center, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Buford, GA, 1972-1973: Supervise, coordinate, and bear responsibility for all activities (security, administrative, support, therapeutic) of a complex 200 inmate adult correctional institution with a staff of 80. Coordinator of Social Services, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Atlanta, GA, 1972: As second-in-command of the Social Services Program participated in the development of the operational aspects of this therapeutic pilot endeavor. Consultant, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Atlanta, GA, 1972: During this period acted as the Assistant to the Deputy Director for Research, Planning, and Program Development. Duties included all personnel functions, budgeting, analysis of existing and proposed programs for the prisons, and coordination of the research and planning tasks. Captain, United States Marine Corps, Various Locations, 1964-1971 Refereed Publications Bullock III, C. & England, D.E. (1992). Prescriptive committee seats in Congress. Midsouth Political Science Journal U, 285-308. Winkle, J. & England, D.E. (1992). Clerks in the civil justice process. Midsouth Political Science Journal, 13, 239-252. England, D.E. (1990). Developments in prison administration. In J.W. Murphy & J.E. Dison (Eds.), Are Prisons Any Better?. (pp. 61-75). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Vanagunas, S. & England, D.E. (1988). Prison crowding: Its ramifications may be broader than we think. CorrectionsToday, 50, 196-199. Levenbach, F.D., England, D.E., & Hartwig, C. (1988). Introduction to U.S. Government: Prior levels and correlates of political knowledge. Arkansas Political Science Journal, 8, 41-61. England, D.E. & Bullock III, C. (1986). Prescriptive seats revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 496-502. Call, J.E., England, D.E. & Talarico, S. (1983 note on the abolition of plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 351-358. Mono graphs England, D.E. & Shedd, M.E. (1982). Alternatives to Incarceration. Institute of Government, University of Georgia: Athens Call, J.E., England, D.E. & Taylor, E. (1981). The First Step to Justice: The Justice of thePeace in Georgia. Institute of Government, University of Georgia: Athens Book Reviews Ingelhart, Louis E. 1997. Press and Speech Freedoms in America, 1619-1995 Chronology. Reviewed in The Law and Politics Book Review, January, 1998. Recent Papers Presented The Supreme Court and the Myth of Legislative District Compactness, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arkansas Political Science Association, Little Rock, AR, February 18-19, 2000 Expert Witness Activities Consultant, Forrest City School District, 1997-1998. Provided demographic information and evaluation of districting schemes in Brown et al. V. Forrest City School District. Consultant/Expert Witness, Walton et al. v. City of Conway, 1997. Provided consulting and affidavits for the Arkansas Municipal League acting as counsel for the respondent. Expert Witness, Perkins et al. v. City of Helena, 1997. Provided testimony and demographic analyses for case brought under the Voting Rights Act. Consultant/Expert Witness, Newport School District, 1994-1996. Provided demographic affidavits inanalMcFarliysesnv.Newpor tSchoolDistrict,analiBialmitst a case bought under the Voting Rights Act. Retained by Brazil, Adlong, Murphy and Osment, respondent's counsel. Consultant/Expert Witness, West Memphis School District, March, 1993. Provided demographic and voting analyses for the school district in a case brought under the Voting Rights Act. Consultant, Harvell et al. v. Ladd et al., November, 1991. Provided demographic consulting for appeal to the 8th U.S. Court of Appeals. Retained by the firm of Friday, Eldredge and Clark, respondent's counsel. Expert Witness/Consultant, Harvell et al. v. Ladd et al., August, 1990-November, 1990. Provided affidavits for defendants in this suit brought under Sect. 2 of the Voting Right Act of 1965. Provided information as to the demographic makeup of the Blytheville School District, racial voting patterns, and suggested election district boundaries. Retained by the firm of Friday, Eldredge, and Clark, defendant's counsel. Consultant, West Memphis School Board, June, 1989-February, 1990. Develop demographic information for the school district and advise the Board on the design of voting zones, wards, and precincts that meet legal requirements under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Retained by the firm of loan, Rubens, and Peeples, the Board's counsel. Expert Witness, State Banking Commission Hearing, November, 1988-December, 1988. Admitted as expert witness and provided testimony before the State Banking Commissioner in a hearing on a bank expansion decision. Provided information on population and wealth growth patterns for the town of Marion in Crittenden County, AR. Retained by the firm of Rieves and Mayton, counsel for the Citizen's Bank of Marion. Expert Witness, Elbert et al. v. Clinton, January, 1988-April, 1988. Provided affidavits and testimony in special three-judge U.S. District Court sitting in Little Rock for Gov. Clinton and the Arkansas Board of Apportionment in this suit brought under Sect. 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Provided information as to the demographic makeup of House of Representative Districts 48 and 49. Retained by the Attorney-General of Arkansas, defendant's counsel. Redistricting Activities Consultant to the following school districts in the drawing of their election zones based on the 2000 Census: Rison School District Waldo School District Walker School District Barton-Lexa School District Osceola School District South Mississippi County School District Lee County School District West Memphis School District Marion School District Stephens School District Hampton School District Harmony Grove School District Bearden School District Jonesboro School District Marvell School District Stuttgart School District Ashdown School District Parkin School District Hughes School District Consultant to the following counties in the drawing of their election zones based on the 2000 Census: Lee County Phillips County Consultant to the following school districts in the drawing of their election zones based on the 1990 Census: Bearden School District Wynne School District East Poinsett County School District Holly Grove School District Barton-Lexa School District Jonesoro School District Elaine School District Hughes School District Newport School District Osceola School District Marvell School District South Mississippi County School District Marion School District West Memphis School District Parkin School District Helena-West Helena School District Consultant to the following counties in the drawing of their election zones based on the 1990 Census: Lee County Poinsett County Other Consulting Activities Campaign Manager/Consultant, Congressional Campaign, January1989-June, 1990. Responsible for strategy and tactics, coordination of media with advertising agency, polling, fundraising, direct mail, etc. in a race in the First Congressional District of AR. (While on leave from ASU) Consultant to the Jonesboro Civil Service Commission, December, 1987-1993. Developed and administered promotional examinations for the Jonesboro Fire Department. Political Consultant, July, 1987-December, 1991. Provided political consulting services to campaigns in Arkansas and Shelby County, TN. Services varied from campaign to campaign but included, in general, strategy and tactics, media design and placement, polling, organization, fund-raising, direct mail, etc. The following is a partial list of Arkansas races in the 1990 election year: State Senate\u2014-Districts 19, 27, 30, 32; State House--Districts 6, 20, 73, 74, 80; County Judge--St. Francis County, Lee County; Circuit Judge-- Judicial District 1; Circuit/Chancery Judge\u2014-Judicial Districts 1, 2, 3, 16; Mayor-\u2014West Memphis, Jonesboro, Forrest City, Marianna, Osceola, Batesville David R. Harding, Jr. Academic Degrees 1985 B.A. Political Science University of Missouri-Columbia 1991 Ph.D. Political Science Ohio State University Professional/Occupational Experience August 1991 -August 1992 Instructor, Political Science Rutgers University, Department of Political Science August 1992 -August1999 Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Administration Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science December 1997 - August1999 Interim Director, Environmental Science Ph.D. Program Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science August 199 9 -Present Associate Professor of Political Science and Public Administration Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science January 2001 Present Director, University Teaching and Learning Center Publications \"Partisan Commitment Research Note.\" 1991. with Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Political Behavior 13:213-221. Associative Memory Structure and the Evaluation of Political Leaders. 1991. Dissertation. Ohio State University. Arkansas Regionalism and the Indirect Effects of Culture. 1997. with F. David Levenbach. Coauthor: F. David Levenbach. Midsouth Political Science Review. Appearance and Transparence in Attitudes Toward Gun Control. 1998. in The Changing Politics of Gun Control, John Bruce and Clyde Wilcox, eds. Rowman and Littlefield Utilization of the by City and County Governments in the State of Arkansas. 1999. with S.G. Lesh. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal [http :// .com/] Regulating the New Agriculture Biotechnology by Managing Innovation Diffusion. 2002. with P.A. Stewart and E. Day. American Review of Public Administration 32: 78-99. Attitudes Toward Gun Control Conservatism and Gun Control General Social Survey Liberalism and Support for Gun Control National Opinion Research Center Ideologies Cons ervativ e and Lib eral \u2014 in The Encyclopedia of Guns and Society. G. Carter, ed. NY: ABC/Clio. Forthcoming Membership in professional organizations American Political Science Association Arkansas Political Science Association (member, former member of Board of Directors) Midwest Political Science Association Northeast Arkansas Environmental Association (Board of Directors 1998-2000; President 2000-2002) Professional and Organization Development Network Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Major Grants/Consulting Projects Northeast Arkansas Earthquake Preparedness Study. Spring, 1994 Funding: Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium Telephone survey of over 900 households in northeastern Arkansas. Data for use by state and local officials as they formulate efforts to educate and prepare citizens for the disruption resulting from severe seismic activity. With Dr. David Vosburg. Arkansan's Attitudes Toward Gaming. Summer, 1994 Funding: College of Arts and Sciences, Arkansas State University Telephone survey of over 600 Arkansans. An academic project to investigate the antecedents of voter support or opposition to legalization of casino gambling, lotteries, and bingo. With Dr. David Levenbach. Community Attitude Survey, City of Pocahontas. Spring, 1997 Survey of approximately 500 residents of the city, concerning attitudes towards various economic and community development strategies. Jonesboro Earthquake Awareness and Preparedness Survey. Fall 1998 Conducted as part of a joint effort with Dr. David Levenbach, in conjunction with 3003 and an honors seminar on Earthquakes. Lengthy telephone survey of approximately 500 households in the city of Jonesboro. Evaluating Project Hope. 1998-2000 Federal grant ($74,082 from the National Institute of Justice) for the evaluation of a drug elimination program in Jonesboro Public Housing. Research and data collection on the success of the drug elimination program and the relationship between residents of public housing, the officials of the housing authority, and Jonesboro Police officers in the program. An Evaluation of the Arkansas Welfare to Work Program. 2000. Collected and analyzed survey data from program participants and administrators for the State of Arkansas. With Dr. Catherine Reese, Dr. John Kaminarides and Eva Stewart. Down on the Delta: Economic Adjustment Strategy Grant. 2001 Summary and analysis of existing literature on economic development projects in the Arkansas Delta for the Arkansas State University Economic Development Authority University Center. With Dr. Patrick Stewart and Dr. Michael Morrell. Delta Devolution Project. 2001-2002 Surveys and Focus Group Interviews of former and current welfare recipients in five Delta counties in Arkansas. Sponsored by Children s Defense Fund. With Dr. George Lord, Dr. Gretchen Hill, Dr. Dick Freer. William P. McLean Work Address _______ Department of Political Science Arkansas State University Wilson 421 State University 72467 Phone: (870) 972-3048 Email: [email protected] Home Address _______ P.O. Box 4253 State University 72467 Publications 2002. (forthcoming Fall) Southern Distinctiveness Over Time: 1972-2000 with Tom W. Rice and Amy Larsen, American Review of Politics. 2001. Performance and Race in Evaluating Minority Mayors with Susan E. Ho well Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 65, Number 3, pp. 321-43. Revise and Resubmit Psychological Attachment to the American South at Sociological Spectrum (with Tom Rice and Angela Reams) Under Review Will the South Rise Again?: Southern Nationalism Among Whites in the Contemporary South at American Review of Politics (with Tom Rice) In Progress Inspector Discretion in the Street-Level Enforcement and Implementation of Regulat ory Po Key Is Attitude Congruence Important?: The Importance of Agency-Inspect or Cohesion in Obtaining Regulatory Compliance ) Objective v. Subjective: Public Opinion Regarding Rural Service Delivery Is Tiebout s Theory Applicable?: Markets and Choices in Rural Service Delivery Research Reports ___________ St. Tammany Growth and Development Survey. Susan E. Howell, William P. McLean, and Matthew Vile. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, September 1999. Public Opinion on the Third Term City Charter Amendment. Susan E. Howell, William P. McLean, and Virginia M. Haysley. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, April 1999. 1998 Quality of Life Survey in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, Louisiana. Susan E. Howell, William P. McLean, and Virginia M. Haysley. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, December 1998. Proud to Call it Home Confidential Report to the Young Leadership Council Of New Orleans. Susan E. Howell and William P. McLean. Final Report to the Young Leadership Council. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, December 1998. Evacuation Behavior in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, Louisiana for Hurricane Georges Susan E. Howell, William P. McLean, and Virginia M. Haysley. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, November 1998. Citizen Evaluation of the Louisiana Courts Report to the Louisiana Supreme Court. Susan E. Howell, William P. McLean, Thomas C. Shaw, and Rosalind B. Cook. Survey Research Center, University of New Orleans, June 1998. Convention Participation ____ 2002. Regulatory Compliance: The Role of Bureaucratic Discretion, Enforcement Styles, and Agency Capacity presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL: April 23-7. 2002. Southern Distinctiveness Over Time: 1972-2000 presented at The Citadel Symposium on Southern Politics, Charleston, SC: March 13-17. 2003. Discussant for panel Policy Implementation and Analysis at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL: April 23-7. 2001. Will the South Rise Again?: Southern Nationalism Among Whites in the Contemporary South presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA: November 7-11. 2001. Inspector Discretion in Street-Level Regulatory Enforcement and Implementation presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL: April 19-22. 2000. Does Religiosity Matter? Psychological Involvement and Campaign Activity in National Elections presented with Randolph Burnside at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC: August 30-September 3. 2000. Music Is Not the Only Thing Going Alternative, So Is the President: Explaining the Use of Executive Agreements presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL: April 25-29. 1999. Performance Models and Minority Mayors presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA: September 2-5. 1999. Executive-Legislative Conflict: The Use of Veto Overrides presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL: April 15-17. 1998. Explaining Outputs of the Environmental Protection Agency presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA: September 3-6. Employment Summer 2002-Present Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Arkansas State University Responsible for teaching courses in the Department of Political Science and the Master of Public Administration Pro gram. Fall 2000-Spring 2002 Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, University of Northern Iowa Responsible for teaching courses in the Department of Political Science and Master of Public Policy program. In addition have been directing the Department of Political Science undergraduate program in Public Administration. Furthermore currently supervise the Department of Political Science internship program (about 25 students per year). January 1998 May 2000 Senior Research Associate, Survey Research Center; University of New Orleans Responsible for training interviewers, design, computer setup, conducting and analyzing polls, and writing reports for polls conducted by the Survey Research Center (SRC). In addition to private contract work, the conducts regular statewide polls for national elections and regular local polls regarding the quality of life and politics in the New Orleans metro area. The uses both (windows based computer assisted telephone interviewing) and CI3 (questionnaire authoring) software to conduct its polls. In addition, in this position am also responsible for conducting tutorials and providing assistance for the following software supported by the for Windows for systems, CATI, and other various applications. Aug. 1996-Dec. 1997 Graduate Teaching Assistant; University of New Orleans Worked for three semesters exclusively as a Teaching Assistant. Instructor of Record as noted above in course descriptions. Class sizes varied between as few as twenty and as many as forty students. Jan. 1995- Dec. 1995 Graduate Teaching Assistant; Arkansas State University Worked two semesters exclusively as a Teaching Assistant. Instructor of Record as noted above in course descriptions. Class sizes ranged from as few as twenty-five students to as many as seventy-five students. Aug. 1994-Dec. 1994 Graduate Research Assistant; Arkansas State University Worked one semester as a research assistant for a professor conducting research on Congress before being recommended to teach. Consulting Assignments January-November, 1999-2000. Carol Castille for Sheriff Campaign, Lafayette, LA. Providing consultation on the design, implementation, and analysis of various tracking/issue polls and campaign strategies. Contact: The Group. R. Michael Brown: 225-752-0806. 1999. Critical Sites on the North Shore of Lake Ponchartrain. Funding provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Lake Ponchartrain Basin Foundation. Contact: John Sutherlin 225-752-3604. 1997. Wastewater Management Plan: Technical, Financial, and Institutional Considerations. Funding provided by the Lake Ponchartrain Basin Foundation. Contact: Juan Josse 504-283-6666. 1997. Wastewater Management Plan for Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana. Funding Provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Lake Ponchartrain Basin Foundation. Contact: John Sutherlin 225-752-3604. Courses Taught 940: 174(g) Public Personnel Administration, Spring 2001 University of Northern Iowa (UNI). Course is a combined class of master and undergraduate degree students. This course is an introduction to public human resource management from a skills-based, performance oriented perspective. Materials covered in this class help students develop job related competencies and prepare students for public service careers 940: 173(g) The Public Policy Process, Fall 2000, Fall 2001 University of Northern Iowa (UNI). Course is a combined class of master and undergraduate degree students. The focus is upon the policy-making process beginning with issue identification and continuing through program evaluation with students applying techniques of program evaluation to current policies and proposed policies 940:014 Introduction to American Politics, Fall 2000, Spring 2001, University o f Nort hern Io wa I). Cour se focu ses on t he fundamental of American Government including the Presidency, Legislative, and Judicial branches as well as American political theory, democracy, political participation and policy 940:015 American Government in a Comparative Perspective, Fall 2001, (UNI). The course engages in comparisons of contemporary political institutions, processes and ideas in the United States and other selected countries 2900 Methods of Political Research, Fall 1999 Instructor of Record (UNO). Course focuses on introducing undergraduates to the basics of political research including the following: scientific method, research design, measurement, polling techniques (design and implementing work carried out in the Survey Research Center introductory statistics (frequencies, crosstabulations, correlations and bivariate regression) using 2151 Introduction to American Government, Fall Spring 1996, Spring 1997, Fall 1997 Instructor of Record (UNO). Course focuses on the fundamental of American Government including the Presidency, Legislative, and Judicial branches as well as American political theory, democracy, political participation and policy 2103 Introduction to American Government, Spring 1995, Fall 1995 Instructor of Record for two sections (ASU). Course focus is generally the same as listed above in 2151. Scholarly Activities Reviewer, Journal of Politics Reviewer, American Review of Politics Reviewer, Politics and Policy Member, Pi Sigma Alpha, National Political Science Honor Society (past chapter president). Member, Pi Gamma Mu, International Social Science Honor Society (past chapter vice- president). Member, American Political Science Association Member, Midwest Political Science Association Member, Southern Political Science Association Member, Policy Studies Organization Member, Iowa Political Science Association Grants Edward I. Artinian Award, Southern Political Science Association, $250 College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Deans Summer Research Grant, Summer 2001, $4100 American Political Science Association, Advanced Graduate Student Travel Grant, 1999, $200 University of New Orleans Student Government Association, Graduate Student Travel Grant, 2000, $300 University of New Orleans Student Government Association, Graduate Student Travel Grant, 1999, $400 University of New Orleans Survey Research Center, Graduate Student Travel Grant, 1999, $250 University of New Orleans Student Government Association, Graduate Student Travel Grant, 1998, $400 References Dr. Steven A. Shull Dr. Susan E. Ho well Department of Political Science Director Survey Research Center University o f New Or leans University o f New Or leans New Orleans 70148 New Orleans 70148 Phone: (504) 280-6463 Phone: (504) 280-6057 Fax: (504) 280-3838 Fax: (504) 280-3838 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Dr. Charles D. Hadley Dr. Tom W. Rice Department of Political Science Department of Political Science University of New Orleans University of Northern Iowa New Orleans 70148 Cedar Falls 50614 Phone: (504) 280-6456 Phone: (319) 273-7049 Fax: (504) 280-3838 Fax: (319) 273-7108 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Dr. Aurelian Craiutu Dr. Raymond J. Burby Department of Political Science Professor of City and Regional Planning 210 Woodburn Hall Department of City and Regional Planning Indiana University University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bloomington 47405 Campus Box 3140 Phone: (812) 855-6308 Chapel Hill 27599-3140 Fax: (812) 855-2027 Phone: (919)962-4774 Email: [email protected] Fax: (919) 962-5206 Email: [email protected] Home Address: Work Address: P.O. Box 981 Departmen t of Political Science State University 72467 P.O. Box 1750 (870) 933-0907 State University 72467 e-mail: [email protected] (870) 972-3048 Ph.D. Political Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL. 1998. M.A. Political Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. 1991. B.A. Political Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. 1988 . Certificate in Canadian Studies, Florida-Canada Institute, University of Central Florida. 1991. Certificate in Spanish Studies, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, University of Madrid, Denia, Spain. 1985 Director, Masters of Public Administration (MPA) Program: Arkansas State University, State University, AR. 2000-present. Represent on Arkansas Public Administration Consortium (APAC) Board of Directors. Assistant Professor of Public Administration: Arkansas State University, State University, AR. 19 98-p resent. Research Assistant: Center for Agriculture in the Environment, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, IL. 1992-1998. Assistantship Research: state and local land use policy, farmland taxation policy, determinants of land value, federal agricultural policy. Teaching Assistant: Political Science Department, Northern Illinois University. 1995-1997. Adjunct Professor: Valencia Community College. 1991-1992. Research and Administrative Assistant to the Director: Florida-Canada Institute, University of Central Florida. 1991-1992. Graduate Assistant: Political Science Department, University of Central Florida. 1990-1991. Intern: Canadian Government Trade Office, Orlando, FL. Summer 1990. Director of Facility: Eastbrook YMCA, Winter Park, Fl. 1987-1988 Introduction to American National Government (Undergraduate): Arkansas State University, Fall 1998,1999,2000; 2001; 2002; Spring 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; Summer 1999, 2000; Valencia Community College, Fall 1991, Spring and Summer 1992. Introduction to Public Policy (Undergraduate): Arkansas State University, Fall 19 98, 1 999, 2001; Northern Illinois University. Spring 1995. Political Psychology (Undergraduate): Arkansas State University, Summer 2002. Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation (Graduate): Arkansas State University, Fall 1998, 1999; Spring 2001, 2002. Techniques of Political and Public Administration Research (Graduate): Arkansas State University, Spring 1999. Environmental Law and Administration (Graduate): Arkansas State University, Spring 2000; Fall 2001. Decision Making (Graduate): Arkansas State University, Summer 2000, 2001, 2002. Environmental Policy (Graduate): Arkansas State University, Fall 2000 Anil Baral. Improvement of Trivalent Chromium Electroplating Baths and Their Environmental, Economic and Policy Implications. Environmental Science Ph.D. Thesis. Ongoing. William Stephens. Biomonitoring the Effects of Nutrient Loading From Aquaculture Effluents in Southeastern United States. Environmental Science Ph.D. Thesis. Ongoing. Franck Waota. Economic Sanctions and Foreign Policy: What We Have Learned from 76 Years of Economic Sanctions. Political Science Masters of Arts Thesis. Fall 2000 Project BRIDGE: Community Building for Northeast Arkansas. Received $85,440 Grant from Community Development Work Study Program. Principal Investigator. Funded2001-2003. Down on the Delta: Economic Adjustment Strategy Grant Secondary Analysis. Received $7,000 consulting fee from Arkansas State University Economic Development Authority University Center. Shared consulting duties with David R. Harding and Michael Morre ll. Funded Spring 2001. Integration of Cover Crops into Pest Management Systems. Coauthor with Seth M. Dabney, Abdullah F.H. Muhamad, Tina Gray Teague, Mark J. Cochran, N.P. Tugwell, and Gordon Snodgrass. $141,000 Grant from Southern Region SARE. Unfunded. Identification of Metrics Sensitive to a Rural Com munity-Based Conservation Initiative. Coauthor with Richard Grippo, Jerry Farris, David Harding, Ronald Johnson and Cristi Milam. $816,743 Grant from EPA/USDA/NSF. Unfunded. (May 1999 Community-Based Conservation Initiative in the Strawberry River Watershed. Coauthor with David Harding, Richard Grippo and Virginia Sullivan. $97,890 Grant from Region 6. Unfunded. (April 1999) Non-Market Benefits of Farmland: Flood Attenuation 825 618-01-0). Received $25,000 Grant from EPA's Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation as part of Quantifying the Non- Farm Benefits of Farmland project. Funded 1997-1998 Defining residen tial Mo men t: 9/11 and the Ra lly Effec t. James N. Schubert, Patrick A. Stewart and Margaret A. Curran. Political Psychology. September 20 02. Vol. 23(3): 559-583. (Refereed) Regulating the New Agricultural Biotechnology by Managing Innovation Diffusion. Patrick A. Stewart, David Harding and Esther Day. American Review of Public Administration. March 2002 Vol.32(1):78-99. (Refereed) Consumption Choices Concerning Genetically Engineered, Organically Grown and Traditionally Grown Foods: An Experiment. Knowledge, Technology and Policy. Summer 2000 Vol.13(1):58-69. Factors Affecting the Adoption of New Techno logies. A. Ann Sorensen, Esther Day and Patrick A. Stewart Eds. George G. Kennedy and Turner B. Sutton. Emerging Technologies for Integrated Pest Management: Concepts Research and Implementation Press, St. Paul, MN. 2000. 12-31 Federal Uncertainty or Inconsistency? Releasing the New Agricultural-Environmental Biotechnology Into the Fields. Patrick A. Stewart and Ann Sorensen. Politics and the Life Sciences. March 2000, Vol.19(1):77-88. (Refereed) Chapter 4: The Economics of Farmland Conversion. Lawrence W. Libby and Patrick A. Stewart. Under the Blade: The Conversion of Agricultural Landscapes. Eds. R.K. Olson and T.A. Lyson. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. 1999. Determ inants of Farmland Value: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois. Patrick A. Stewart and Lawrence W. Libby. Review of Agricultural Economics. Spring/Summer 1998, Vol.20(1 ):80- 95. (Refereed) Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Emotions and Heuristics. Research in Biopolitics: Volume #5 eds. Albert Somit and Steven A. Peterson Press: Greenwich, CT. 1 997). Regulation of New Agricultural/Environmental Biotechnology: Framing the Prospects. Illinois Political Science Review Spring 199 6, Vol.2 (1):3 1-47. Public and Private Field Testing of Agricultural Biotechnology. Patrick A. Stewart and A. Ann Sorensen Technology Transfer of Plant Biotechnology ed. Peter M. Gressho ff (Boca Raton Press, Inc. 199 6). New Bio techno logy and Agriculture: Regulatory Challenges. Patrick A. Stewart and Ann Sorensen Journal of Environmental Law and Practice March/April 1 995, 2(5):40-4 9 Editor. Revitalizing Downtown Jonesboro Needs Analysis 6 503 (Policy Analysis and Evaluation) and 4503 (Introduction to Public Policy) class project. Prepared for Jonesboro Central Planning Association (JCPA). December 14, 199 9. 44 pages. Editor Workshop on Bt Crop Resistance Management. Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Rosemont, IL. June 18, 1999. 88 pages. Citizens Share Thoughts on Suburban Sprawl. Agro-Ecology News and Perspectives. 1999 7(2): 8-9,16. DeKalb County, Illino is. Patrick A. Stewart and Lawrence W. Libby. Case study in Under the Blade: The Conversion of Agricultural Landscapes. Eds. R.K. Olson and T.A. Lyson. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln, NE. 1999. Dissertation. Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty: The Case of Agricultural Biotechnology. Focuses on decision making processes in the public policy issue arena of agricultural biotechnology. Committee: Andrea L. Bonnicksen (chair), Lettie McSpadden, James N. Schubert, and A. Ann Sorensen. December 1998. Book Review: Policy Controversy in Biotechnology: An Insiders View Politics and the Life Sciences Fall, 199 8. Book Review: Risk, Science, and Politics: Regulating Toxic Substances in Canada and the United States & Regulating Risk: The Science and Politics of Risk. in Politics and the Life Sciences March 1997.16(1): 20-23. Book Review: Superpigs and Wondercorn. in Politics and the Life Sciences August 1994. 13(2): 309-310. Public ssessm ents of Benefits and Risks. with Ann orensen and Ted cKinney in Agricultural Biotechnology Public Conversation About Risk National Agricultural Biotechnology Council #5 conference report, June 1993. Untitled Poem. in Dividends: Literary Arts Journal Spring, 1995, p.6. Untitled Poem. in Artist/Writer March 1993, p.5. Canadian Health Care. a three part series of articles in Canadian Review, Fall 1991-Spring 1992 Subliminals in the 2000 Presidential Election: Policy Implications of Applied Neuro science. Patrick A. Stewart. Revise and Resubmit at Journal of Political Marketing. Presidential Sp eechm aking Style: Emotional Response to Micro-Displays of Facial Affect. Patrick A. Stewart, James N. Schubert and Margaret A. Curran. Under review at Political Psychology #4140 or just Bureaucrats? An experiment testing the effect of subliminals in a Presidential race advertisement on viewer response. Patrick A. Stewart, James N. Schubert and Margaret A. Curran. Under review at Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics. (MS#19965) Alcohol Policy in Arkansas: Drinking in the Natural State. Patrick A. Stewart, Catherine C. Reese and Jeremy Brewer. Under review at American Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Stormflow and Land Use Change: Low Density Development in the Ferson-Otter Creek Watershed, 1960-1996. With Mic hael T. Ritsc he and ouglas Krieg er. Center for Ag ricultur e in the Environ men t. (Refereed) Kane Coun ty Residential Value: The Influence of Open Space Amenities. With Douglas Krieger. Center for Agriculture in the Environment. (Refereed) Farmland Tax Policy: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois. with Lawrence W. Lib by. Center for Agriculture in the Environm ent. (Refereed) Determinants of Farmland Value. with Lawrence W. Libby. Center for Agriculture in the Environment. (Refereed) fic.niu.edu/cae/wp/wp97-1 0.html Biological Pest Control. cited in American Farmland Trust response to EPA: Incentives for Development Defining Presidential Moment: 9/11 and the Rally Effect. Patrick A. Stewart, James N. Schubert and Margaret A. Curran. Poster presented at Midwest Political Science Association 2002 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. April 25-28. Sub limina hies in the 2 000 Presiden tial Electio n: Policy Imp lication s of Applied Neuro science. Patrick A. Stewart Paper presented at Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Charleston October 18-21, 2001. Presidential Rally Speeches and the Role of Emotional Response: Process Matters. Patrick A. Stewart. Paper presented at Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Charleston October 18-21, 2001. The Rally Effect: Emotional Response to the World Trade Center and Pentago n Attacks. Patrick A. Stewart. Poster presented at Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Charleston October 18-21, 2001. Decision-Making: Bringing Emotions into the Classroom. Patrick A. Stewart. Teaching Poster presented at Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Charleston October 18-21, 2001 or Just Bureaucrats? An Experiment Testing the Effect of Subliminals in a Presidential Race Advertisement on Viewer Response. With James N. Schubert and Margaret A. Curran. Midwest Political Science Association 2001 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. April 19-22. Emotional Responses to Micro-Displays of Facial Affect in Rally Speeches. With James N. Schubert and Margaret A. Curran. Midwest Political Science Association 2001 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. April 19-22. Alcohol Policy in Arkansas: Drinking in the Natural State. With Jeremy Brewer and Catherine Reese. Arkansas Political Science Association 2001 Annual Meeting, Searcy February 23- 24, 2001. Wet, Da mp and Dry tudy of Arka nsas Coun ties and Alcoh ol-Rela ted Cra shes. With Jeremy Brewer and Catherine Reese. Illinois Political Science Association 2000 Annual Meeting, DeKalb November 11, 2000. Personal and Public Risks from Genetic Engineering: Experimental Evidence Concerning the Influence of Framing on Policy Preferences. Annual meeting of the Assoc iation for Politics and the Life Sciences in Washington August 31-September 3, 2000. The ally Effect: Em otiona l Respo nse to Micro-displays of Fac ial Affe ct (Poster). With James N. Schubert and Margaret Curran. Annual meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Washington August 31-September 3, 2000. Regulating the New Agricultural Biotechno logy b y Man agin g Inn ovatio n Diffusion (Poster). With Lora Hannaman, David R. Harding and Esther ay. Annual meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Washington August 31-September 3, 2000. Incentive Based Agricultural-Environmental Biotechnology Regulation. with David Harding and Esther Day. 58th annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago April 27-30, 2000. The Effect of Cons ump tion Ch oice on Policy Preferences: An Experim ent Co ncern ing Genetically Engineered, Organically Grown and Traditionally Grown Foods (Poster). 58th Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago April 27-30, 2000. Consumption and Policy Choices Concerning the New Food Biotechnology and Organically Grown Foods: An Experiment. Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Atlanta September 2-5, 1999. Differential Influence of Children on Suburbanite Preference for Open Space and Farmland (Poster). With David Harding, Margaret Curran and Douglas Krieger. Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Atlanta September 2-5,1999. Defin ing the Caus e of En vironm ental isasters and its Influ ence o n Policy referen ces Multi-me dia Experim ent. Presented at 57th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago April 15-17, 1999. Kane County Residential Value: The Influence of Open Space Amenities. With Douglas Krieger. Americ an Society for Public Administration 60th National Conference in Orlando,FL. April 12, 1999. Factors Affecting the Adoption of New Techno logies. With A. Ann Sorensen and Esther Day. International Conference on Emerging Technologies for Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Research and Implementation. Raleigh, NC. March 8-10, 1999. The Role of Framing in Policy Preferences: Natural vs. Manmade. 70th annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in Atlanta October 28-31, 1998. Natural vs. Man-Made: An Application of the Bioph ilia Hypothesis to Public Policy? Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Boston September 3-6, 1998. Reactions and Policy Preferences. Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Boston September 3-6, 1998. Emotional Nature: Circumplex Measures in an Experiment. International Society of Political Psychology in Montreal, Canada July 12-15, 1998. Pricing of Kane County Residences: The Value of Farmland. with Douglas Krieger. Illinois Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Elgin, Illinois, October 25, 1997. Attribu tions, Emotions, and Nature. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., August 28-31, 1997. Regulation of Risk: The Case of New Agricultural-Environmental Biotechnology. Northeastern Political Science Annual Meeting, Boston, November 14-16,1996. Farmers, Social Construction of Target Populations, and Differential Taxation Case Study of DeKalb County, Illinois. with Lawrence W. Libby. Illinois Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Normal, Illinois, November 9, 1996. Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Emotions and Heuristics. Association for Politics and the Life Sciences/International Political Science Association Research Committee #12 Meeting at Alfred University, Alfred, New York, July 25, 1996. Federal Regulation of New Agricultural/Environmental Biotechnology: The Influence of Risk Perceptions. Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 18-20, 1996. Agriculture and Land Use. with Ann Sorensen. \"The Land Use Decision Making Process: It's Role in a Sustainable Future for Michigan.\" East Lansing January 9-10, 1996. Regulation of New Agricultural/Environmental Biotechnology: Framing the Prospects. Illinois Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Rockford. November 1995. The Political Imp acts of Policy Changes in Field Testing of Agricultural Biotechnology. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New York. September 1994. Status and Attention in Local Television News on State Elections: the 1992 and 1994 Democratic Primaries in Illinois. with James N. Schubert, Donna Balash, Peter Holaves, David Ivers, Michael J. Tweed, and Hiram Wurf. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New York. September 1994. Dom inance and Attention in Media Coverage of the 1992 Primary Elections. with James N. Schubert, Donna Balash, Dave Ivers, Miriam Levitt, Gamal Soltan, and Vidu Soni. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washinton D.C. September 1993. Government Intervention in High Technology in the State of Florida. Florida Political Science Annual Meeting, Sarasota. March 1992 Regression, LISREL, ARIMA, Logit/Probit. SPSS-Windows, SPSS-PC, SPSSx, SAS-PC, ARC/INFO, Various spreadsheet and d-base programs. Spanish Invited Workshop Participant- The Challenge of Developing Programs in Small/Rural Communities. Community Development Work Study Conference. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC, October 25-26, 2001. Invited Workshop Participant- Assessing the National Resources Inventory (NRI) and Other Indicators of Farmland Conversion. Natural Resource Conservation Service . Department of Agriculture. Chicago, IL, November 27-28, 2000. Participant- Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA) On-site Inspection Workshop. National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration. (NASPAA) Annual Conference. Miami Beach, FL, October 13-16, 1999. Participant- Biological Perspectives in the Social Sciences by The Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research and The Nelson A. Rockefeller Center for the Social Sciences. Dartmouth College, August 13-19, 1994. Participant- Methodology Workshop by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, September 1, 1993. Participant- Teaching Genetic Issues by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, August 30, 1992 American Political Science Association Advanced Graduate Student Travel Grant for 90th annual meeting, September 1-3, 1994. Seminar Grant, Biological Perspectives in the Social Sciences, Dartmouth College, August 13-19,1994. University of Central Florida Student Government Leadership Scholarship, 1991. Member: American Political Science Association American Society for Public Administration Arkansas Political Science Association Association for Politics and the Life Sciences Illinois Political Science Association Midwest Political Science Association National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration Political Methodology Section Panel Organizer and Participant- Roundtable on Evolution and Public Administration. Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2002 Annual Meeting. Montreal, Quebec, CA. August 11-14. Chair- Agricultural Biotechnology. Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2002 Annual Meeting. Montreal, Quebec,CA. August 11-14. Invited Presentation The Face of Leadership: Nonverbal Communication. Arkansas County Treasurer s Annual Meeting. Hot Springs, AR, June 11, 2002. Panel Organizer and Chair- Environmental Policy. Arkansas Political Science Association 2002 Meeting. Jonesboro, AR, February 22, 2002. Chair- Student Panel. Arkansas Political Science Association 2002 Meeting. Jonesboro, AR, February 22-23, 2002. Panel Organizer and Chair- The Politics of Sin: Gambling, Smoking and Drinking. Illinois Political Science Association 2000 Meeting, DeKalb, ILNovember 11, 2000. Chair- Concluding Panel: Water for Eastern Arkansas Agriculture. Arkansas Soil & Water Education Conference. Jonesboro December 6, 1999. Chair- Genetics, Biotechnology, and Society. 18th annual meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences in Atlanta September 2, 1999. Invited presentation Hedonic Analysis of Residential Values in Kane County for the Economics Club. College of Business, University of Central Florida, Orlando April 9, 1999. Invited presentation- The Value of Kan e County Residences Near Farmlan d and Publicly Accessible Open Space for the undergraduate clas s Environmental Po licy. College of Arts and Sciences, Univers ity of Central Florida. Orlando April 9, 1999. Discussant- Concluding Panel: Irrigation for Delta Crops: 1998 and Beyond. Arkansas Soil & Water Education Conference. Jonesboro December 10,1998. Invited presentation- Risk and Uncertainty: The Case of Environmental Biotechnology for the distance learning class Biotechnology: Science and Socio-economic Issues. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware, October 20,1998. Discussant-Panel: The Dynamics of Policy Change. 1997 Southern Political Science Association Meeting. Norfolk November 5-8. Speaker- Making our Public Schools Work. Second Annual African-American Leadership Conference: Implementing Strategies for Change. April 22,1995 Co-Chair Search Committee- Department of Political Science. Arkansas State University. 2001-2002. Chair Search Committee- Department of Political Science. Arkansas State University. 2000- 2001. Member- Environmental Sciences Ph.D. Program Committee Member. Arkansas State University. 199 8-present. Member- Environmental Sciences Ph.D. Program Director Search Committee. Arkansas State University 1998-1999. Assistant Coach- Arkansas State University Rugby Football Club. Arkansas State University. 1999-present. 2002 College Division National Championship finalist, ranked #7 in nation. 2001 College Division National Championship finalists, ranked #2 in nation. 2000 National Champions, College Division II/Plate,ranked #5 in nation Rugby Certified Level in Coach, Chicago (August 2001 Rugby Certified Level Coach, Dallas (July 2000 Rugby Certified Club Coach, Chicago (July 1997). Student Association Senator-Northern Illinois University, 1994-1998. Member- West Campus Master Plan Advisory Committee. Northern Illinois University, 1996-1997. Graduate Student Representative- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences- Graduate Student Advisory Committee. Northern Illinois University, 1996-1997. Coach- Northern Illinois University Women's Rugby Club. Northern Illinois University. 1996-1997. Graduate Student Representative- Political Science Department Northern Illinois University, 1995-1996. Academic Advisor- Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. Northern Illinois University 1995-1996. Moderator/Producer- \"Students View the News FM, Orlando, FL. 1988-1990 Coordinator of Development/Student Government Liaison AM, Orlando, FL. 1990 Opinion Columnist/Reporter- Central Florida Future, Orlando, FL. 1989-1990 Andrea L. Bonnicksen, Chair Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University DeKalb 60115 [email protected] James Schubert Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University DeKalb 60115 T70jns1 @corn.cso.niu.edu Lawrence W. Libby C. William Swank Chair in Rural- Urban Policy Department of Agricultural Economics 336 Agricultural Administration Building 2120 Fyffe Road Ohio State University Columbus 43210-1066 [email protected] M. Elliot Vittes Department of Political Science P.O. Box 161356 University of Central Florida Orlando 32816-1356 Vittes@pega sus.cc.ucf.ed u Lettie McSpadden Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University DeKalb 60115 [email protected] A. Ann Sorensen, Director Center for Agriculture in the Environment P.O. Box 987 DeKalb 60115 T70aas1 @niu.edu Robert L. Bledsoe, Chair Department of Political Science P.O. Box 161356 University of Central Florida Orlando 32816-1356 Bledsoe@pegasus. cc.ucf.edu EDUCATION: Ph.D. Political Science Political Science Wayne State University 5/89 Wayne State University 5/83 State University of New York Fredonia 5/72 PROFESSIONAL: Interim Chair, Political Science Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor Instructor Admin. Asst. to the Mayor, Jamestown, New York 2000-2001 1997-present 1989-1997 1986-1989 1982-1986 1972-1974 TEACHING: PUBLICATIONS: Local Government, State Government, Arkansas Government, Urban Politics, Public Administration, American Wang, Richard P., Problems in Evaluating Economic Development Strategies: An Urban Perspective , International Journal of Public Administration 12 (3) 1989, pp.85-110. Kubic, Paul J. and Richard P. Wang, The Political Economy of Environmental Policy , in Joy L. Clark et al., eds., Current Regional Issues (Fort Worth: The Dryden Press), 1994, pp. 39-44. Wang, Richard P. et al., Bridging the Gap Between Town and Gown: Local Government Expertise and the Role of the University , International Journal of Public Administration 19 (8) 1996, pp. 1255-1288. Wang, Richard P. and Michael B. Dougan, eds., Arkansas Politics Reader (Fayetteville: m&m Press), 1997. GRANTS: U.S. Commerce Department, Economic Development Administation (through Center for Economic Development). Student Interns in Economic Development Project (1993: $25,000). Red Tag Grant Center for Economic Development Study of Citizen Perception of the Quality and Cost of Community Services in Harrisburg (1992: $9000). Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission (with D. Levenbach, J. Gates). Public Management Expertise in the Delta and Delta Development (1990: $16,490). Fellow, William H. Spoor Dialogues on Leadership Program. Leadership in American State Politics and the American Federal System (1989). PRESENTATIONS: The Politics of Community Development Corporations. Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association. New Orleans, March 7-10, 1994. Building Communities in the Inner-City in Little Rock. Annual Meeting of the Arkansas Political Science Association. Little Rock, February 25-26, 1994. Public Policy and Economic Development Report From Arkansas. Annual Meeting of the Southwest Political Science Association. New Orleans, March 18-20, 1993. The Declining Importance of Place in America: The Politics of Development Policies in Backwater Arkansas Towns and Frostbelt Cities. Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association. Austin, March 20, 1992 Public Management Expertise in the Delta and Delta Development. Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration. Clearwater, October 6, 1990. Choice v. Necessity in Economic Development Policymaking: Mayoral Leadership in Detroit and Boston. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, April 5-6, 1990 (with A. Digaetano, Baruch College).", "7222_103.pdf": "30\u00b0 Jonesboro 16 Weather Alerts In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 Videos Watch Live News Updated June 9, 2007 6:24 p.m JONESBORO-In a statement to police it is alleged that Doctor Gregory Russell and his wife, Doctor Ellen Lemley, drugged a female student and took her to their home on the evening of April 19th. The victim alleges she awoke in their bed the next morning covered in blood from the waist down. Both professors resigned from Arkansas State University on June 1st, amidst an investigation by the college. So why did it take so long for the criminal investigation to begin?\"It really needed to be the complainant that came here do understand why the University didn't call. It's not really their position to call. It should be the victim's responsibility to call us.\" Detective Ernest Ward says he's talked to nearly thirty people, and read hundreds of emails from students of the University, but right now he's still not sure what actions will be taken. \"It's still very early in the investigation. I'm gathering pieces of the puzzle. Once gather all of the pieces I'll start putting them together. Right now I'm still not at liberty to say what all I've been told,\" said Ward. He says one of the more challenging things is the amount of time that passed. \"The longer the time span, the longer evidence grows cold and disappears. The stories change. They seem to grow sometimes. Different people hear things and they will call me, and often there is not a lot to it,\" said Ward. But he does say it's a case that probably won't disappear any time soon. \"It's going to be an interesting case. It's going to be an educational case for me,\" said Ward. Detective Ward urges anyone with any information to contact him at 870-935-6649 or email him at [email protected]. *Story ideas or comments? Email Will at [email protected]. June 7, 2007 - Posted at 5:45 p.m JONESBORO-Two Arkansas State University professors have resigned amidst allegations of rape by a female student. K8 news has learned Doctor Gregory Russell and his wife, Doctor Ellen Lemley resigned from their positions from the University June first. Criminal Investigation Begins into Rape Scandal Published: Jun. 8, 2007 at 8:37 | Updated: Jun. 9, 2007 at 10:29 \uf057 2/22/25, 10:46 Criminal Investigation Begins into Rape Scandal 1/4 Now a police investigation is underway. We spoke with Doctor Russell on the phone Thursday morning. He says he can't comment, other than to say he and his wife's attorney are preparing a slander/libel lawsuit against the student and possible other parties. But no matter the outcome, the allegations of rape are serious. Both Doctor Gregory Russell and his wife Ellen Lemley could usually be found teaching Criminology classes in Arkansas State University's International Student Center. But now, their doors are closed, marking the resignation of both after allegations of rape by a student. In a request for an order of protection, the victim alleges that on April 19th, she and her friends were at a downtown restaurant having dinner. She says that Dr. Russell and Dr. Lemley asked her and her friends to have dinner at their table. She says a little bit later that she believes her drink was drugged, and she woke up at the house of Doctors Russell and Lemley. At the couples home on Chimney Chase Drive, the victim alleges that she awoke naked with her lower body covered in blood. She claims former professor, Doctor Russell told her she was at his house, and moments later his wife, Ellen Lemley, also an professor climbed into bed with her. It is reported that Russell later took the victim home and over the next few days, both he and his wife allegedly made numerous phone calls to the victim saying things like love you and want to be with you.\" Officials with Arkansas State, say they are taking the matter seriously. \"We take any and every allegation very seriously, because we want to protect the welfare and interest of our students, but we also want to protect the integrity of our University,\" said Vice Chancellor, Dr. Glen Jones. When we asked if the University was aware of the allegations they answered saying, \"Yes, we were aware the allegations were made, and according to University policy on Sexual Harrassment, when allegations are made the University very promptly investigates those allegations.\" But before the investigation was complete, both Russell and Lemley resigned from their positions. K8 News continues to follow this story. Coming up Saturday on K8 News at six, Will Carter sits down with police to talk about their investigation and where this case could go from here. Story ideas or comments? Email Will at [email protected]. Most Read \uf144 ASP: 3 dead, 5 injured in crash on U.S. 63 \uf057 2/22/25, 10:46 Criminal Investigation Begins into Rape Scandal 2/4 \uf144 2 killed in U.S. 67 crash \uf144 Nurse accused of using dead patient\u2019s name to get narcotics \uf144 $2.5M bond set in murder case ALERT: Brutal cold arrives in Region 8 \uf144 2 Jonesboro women arrested in statewide human trafficking raids Reports: JCPenney to close stores nationwide. Here\u2019s the list \uf144 Two people hurt after Saturday evening shooting \uf057 2/22/25, 10:46 Criminal Investigation Begins into Rape Scandal 3/4 \uf057 Public Inspection File [email protected] - (870) 336-1817 Statement Applications Closed Captioning/Audio Description 8 Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Service Legal Advertising Digital Marketing At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 Home News Weather Sports Submit a News Tip See It, Snap It, Send It Meet the Team What\u2019s On Grow Your Business With Us 472 766 Jonesboro 72401 (870) 931-8888 2/22/25, 10:46 Criminal Investigation Begins into Rape Scandal 4/4", "7222_104.pdf": "By By UPDATED: UPDATED: September 8, 2018 at 12:00 September 8, 2018 at 12:00 JONESBORO, Ark professor who once headed the criminology department JONESBORO, Ark professor who once headed the criminology department at Chico State University, has resigned from his job as an associate professor at at Chico State University, has resigned from his job as an associate professor at Arkansas State University, but is fighting an allegation he raped a female student. Arkansas State University, but is fighting an allegation he raped a female student. Gregory D. Russell resigned from the faculty June 1, along with his wife, assistant Gregory D. Russell resigned from the faculty June 1, along with his wife, assistant professor Ellen Lumley, also accused of rape by an unidentified 25-year-old professor Ellen Lumley, also accused of rape by an unidentified 25-year-old student. student. An official with the Jonesboro police said no criminal charges have been filed An official with the Jonesboro police said no criminal charges have been filed against the couple. against the couple. Detective Ernest Ward said the couple hasn\u201dt even been interviewed yet, at the Detective Ernest Ward said the couple hasn\u201dt even been interviewed yet, at the insistence of their attorney, but he hopes to talk with them next week. insistence of their attorney, but he hopes to talk with them next week. Ward said his office is getting about 40 calls and e-mails a day about the case, Ward said his office is getting about 40 calls and e-mails a day about the case, many supporting the two professors. many supporting the two professors. After leaving Chico State, Russell taught in Washington state. Lemley was After leaving Chico State, Russell taught in Washington state. Lemley was reportedly one of his former students. reportedly one of his former students Former Chico State professor Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations resigns over rape allegations Loading your audio article Loading your audio article 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 1/14 The young woman made statements to university officials about the alleged rape, The young woman made statements to university officials about the alleged rape, and said she was told the professors would be terminated. and said she was told the professors would be terminated. They resigned before that could happen. The student filed a report with Jonesboro They resigned before that could happen. The student filed a report with Jonesboro police June 6, then sought a protection order against the couple. police June 6, then sought a protection order against the couple. She alleged the couple drugged her drinks during dinner at a local restaurant in She alleged the couple drugged her drinks during dinner at a local restaurant in April, then took her to their home, where both Russell and Lemley sexually April, then took her to their home, where both Russell and Lemley sexually assaulted her. assaulted her. She said she woke up in their bed, covered with blood from her waist to her thighs. She said she woke up in their bed, covered with blood from her waist to her thighs. She further alleged the couple contacted her several times after that, urging her to She further alleged the couple contacted her several times after that, urging her to participate in sexual encounters. participate in sexual encounters. The protection order sought by the alleged victim was denied by a Craighead The protection order sought by the alleged victim was denied by a Craighead County judge, who said her request didn\u201dt fall under Arkansas\u201d Domestic Abuse County judge, who said her request didn\u201dt fall under Arkansas\u201d Domestic Abuse Act. Act. Russell has reportedly made few comments about the allegations, but told the Russell has reportedly made few comments about the allegations, but told the Jonesboro Sun newspaper everything that happened between the young woman Jonesboro Sun newspaper everything that happened between the young woman and the couple was consensual. and the couple was consensual. He\u201ds threatened to file a slander/libel suit against the student, and possibly others. He\u201ds threatened to file a slander/libel suit against the student, and possibly others. The Sun has filed a Freedom of Information request seeking information from the The Sun has filed a Freedom of Information request seeking information from the university concerning statements made by the alleged victim. university concerning statements made by the alleged victim. While at Chico State in the mid 1990s, Russell left his mark by helping to form a While at Chico State in the mid 1990s, Russell left his mark by helping to form a citizens committee to combat growing gang violence in Chico. citizens committee to combat growing gang violence in Chico. Read More Read More 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 2/14 Originally Published: Originally Published: June 16, 2007 at 12:00 June 16, 2007 at 12:00 At the time, he said the task force was formed on the assumption that \u201cwe\u201dre past At the time, he said the task force was formed on the assumption that \u201cwe\u201dre past the stage of denial.\u201d the stage of denial.\u201d \u201cThis town needs help, and you folks are that help,\u201d he told about 100 citizens \u201cThis town needs help, and you folks are that help,\u201d he told about 100 citizens attending a task force seminar. attending a task force seminar. Around the Web Around the Web Find Useful Knowledge Find Useful Knowledge Ethereal Search Engine Ethereal Search Engine The Close Relationship Between The Close Relationship Between Stress and Sleep Stress and Sleep 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 3/14 Heartwarming Reaction From a Heartwarming Reaction From a Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for the First Time the First Time Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Limone at Home Limone at Home Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro and Fro 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 4/14 Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? Is My Space a Good Fit for Airbnb? The Best Places to Buy College The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy Too Easy Get Mortgage Advice Close to Home Get Mortgage Advice Close to Home 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 5/14 The New Normal of Selling a Home The New Normal of Selling a Home Today Today Nine Kinds of Ancestors You Could Nine Kinds of Ancestors You Could Find on Your Family Tree Find on Your Family Tree Should You Buy an Electric Car? Should You Buy an Electric Car? 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 6/14 Four Ways Food Banks Are Feeding Four Ways Food Banks Are Feeding Kids Right Now Kids Right Now Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Mind More Accessible to All Mind More Accessible to All Walmart Center for Racial Equity Walmart Center for Racial Equity Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Justice Justice 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 7/14 Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com Search Newspapers.com Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online Online Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Changes Changes 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 8/14 Why Google Workspace for Business Why Google Workspace for Business is Worth the Upgrade is Worth the Upgrade Stop Paying Too Much for Your Stop Paying Too Much for Your Prescriptions - Compare Prices, Find Prescriptions - Compare Prices, Find Free Coupons, Free Coupons, How Long Should Keep My Car? How Long Should Keep My Car? 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 9/14 Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness Health & Happiness Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro and Fro Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Get Dog Food Designed for Your Dog's Health & Happiness Health & Happiness 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 10/14 Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Limone at Home Limone at Home Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Five Reasons Your Car Insurance Rate Changes Changes Should You Buy an Electric Car? Should You Buy an Electric Car? 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 11/14 How Long Should Keep My Car? How Long Should Keep My Car? Walmart Center for Racial Equity Walmart Center for Racial Equity Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Update: Advancing Equity in Criminal Justice Justice The New Normal of Selling a Home The New Normal of Selling a Home Today Today 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 12/14 Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online Online Heartwarming Reaction From a Heartwarming Reaction From a Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for Couple Meeting Their Rescue Dog for the First Time the First Time The Best Places to Buy College The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy Too Easy 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 13/14 2007 2007 \ue907 \ue907June June \ue907 \ue90716 16 Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Ring Devices Help Make Peace of Mind More Accessible to All Mind More Accessible to All 2/22/25, 10:46 Former Chico State professor resigns over rape allegations \u2013 The Vacaville Reporter 14/14"} |
7,210 | James Teuscher | Antelope Valley College | [] | {} |
8,388 | Roland G. Fryer Jr. | Harvard University | [
"8388_101.pdf",
"8388_102.pdf",
"8388_103.pdf",
"8388_104.pdf",
"8388_105.pdf",
"8388_106.pdf",
"8388_102.pdf",
"8388_103.pdf",
"8388_102.pdf",
"8388_103.pdf"
] | {"8388_102.pdf": "Harvard suspends famed professor Roland Fryer for 2 years over 'unwelcome sexual conduct' Published 2:53 p.m July 10, 2019 Updated 2:58 p.m July 10, 2019 Joey Garrison \u2014 Roland Fryer Jr., a celebrated Harvard University economics professor, will be suspended two years and see the research lab he oversees shut down permanently in response to multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Harvard on Wednesday announced the unpaid administrative leave and a series of other sanctions \u2013 including the closing of the Education Innovation Laboratory or EdLabs, the site of many of the harassment allegations review of formal allegations concluded that Fryer engaged in \"unwelcome sexual conduct toward several individuals, resulting in the creation of a hostile work environment over the course of several years,\" wrote Claudine Gay, dean of the university's Faculty of Arts and Science (FAS), to the economics department. \"In short, Professor Fryer exhibited a pattern of behavior that failed to meet expectations of conduct within our community and was harmful to the well-being of its members,\" Gay said was particularly upset to learn of the ways in which EdLabs members have been impacted, both personally and professionally. The totality of these behaviors is a clear violation of institutional norms and a betrayal of the trust of the community.\" Harvard University Add Topic 3/15/25, 12:46 Harvard suspends economist Roland Fryer for 'unwelcome sexual conduct' 1/4 More: Former Harvard dean, removed after defending Weinstein, speaks out for first time since ouster, condemns school The announcement comes more than a year after the first of multiple Title investigations into Fryer's behavior was launched by Harvard's Office for Dispute Resolution after one of his former employees at EdLabs, which he founded, named him in a complaint. Some of the allegations from women go back a decade. During Fryer's two-year suspension he won't be permitted to teach, advise or conduct research involving Harvard resources. If he returns, Gay said he will face restrictions: He won't have advising or supervisory roles at Harvard; He will be allowed to teach undergraduate courses, but subject to monitoring by a Title IX-trained individual and and without access to graduate teaching fellows; He will be able to teach graduate classes but not graduate workshops. \"At the end of those two years will decide whether to restore some or all of these privileges,\" she said. Fryer, 42, did not respond to an email seeking comment on Harvard's decision. However, in a 2018 letter to the editor to the New York Times, Fryer apologized for making \"off-color jokes\" around lab employees and commented on their dating lives. \"If anyone who worked at the lab ever felt alienated, confused or offended by the environment sincerely apologize,\" he wrote. But he rejected any allegation that he is \"against women\" or retaliated against employees. The letter was in response to a Times report on a university investigation that concluded Fryer committed unwelcome conduct on seven occasions that violated university policy. The Times cited interviews of Fryer's former employees, who 3/15/25, 12:46 Harvard suspends economist Roland Fryer for 'unwelcome sexual conduct' 2/4 characterized him as \"a bully,\" and the lab as a place where \"sexual jokes and comments were routine, and where employees were expected to laugh along with the group or risk being isolated.\" Fryer sent unwanted after-hour texts, one woman alleged in a complaint, that \"quickly veered into flirtatious and sexual overtures,\" The Times reported. The woman started visiting his apartment after starting at EdLabs at age 23. One time Fryer complained that she left too early, according to The Times. One text he sent to her read, \"\u201cUr lucky ur not here would either tackle, bite u or both. The Harvard Crimson, the university's student-run newspaper, was the first to report on the sexual harassment allegations against Fryer last year. One of the complaints alleged Fryer committed \u201cegregious\u201d acts of verbal sexual harassment, the newspaper reported. The woman accused Fryer of speaking about sex in the workplace, making \u201csexually inappropriate comments\u201d to and about employees and others. She also said he \u201cobjectified and sexualized\u201d women, including female staffers. The lab's stated mission was conducting economics research \"devoted to closing the racial achievement gap.\" Fryer is considered one of the leading African-American economists in a field where minorities have historically lagged in representation. He's received the MacArthur \"Genius\" Fellowship and the John Bates Clark Medal, given by the American Economic Association to the best American economist under age 40, which is considered the second-highest honor in the field behind the Nobel price. His ascendance from a humble upbringing \u2013 \"From the hood to Harvard,\" The Economist wrote in 2015 \u2013 has been the subject of many stories. At 30 years old, Fryer was the youngest African-American to receive tenure at Harvard. The New York Times reported Fryer is also among the highest-paid 3/15/25, 12:46 Harvard suspends economist Roland Fryer for 'unwelcome sexual conduct' 3/4 employees at Harvard, earning a salary of more than $600,000 in 2016, according to tax filings. \"Before coming to Harvard, Fryer worked at McDonald's (drive-thru, not corporate),\" says Fryer's profile page on Harvard's website. Fryer is known for his work on education, inequality, and race, his profile page reads. Among his most controversial papers: a study that concluded there's no racial bias in shootings by police. More: Paper finding no racial bias in shootings by police criticized Harvard's actions against Fryer come after the university in May barred prominent former government professor Jorge Dominguez from its campus and stripped him of his emeritus status after an investigation found repeated \"unwelcome sexual conduct\" targeting multiple students and faculty over four decades. Reach Joey Garrison on Twitter @joeygarrison. 3/15/25, 12:46 Harvard suspends economist Roland Fryer for 'unwelcome sexual conduct' 4/4", "8388_103.pdf": "Coming to Terms with Sexual Harassment by John S. Rosenberg 2019 the January news that Winthrop House faculty dean Ronald S. Sullivan Jr. would represent movie producer Harvey Weinstein against multiple charges of sexual assault, student residents, and other undergraduates, called for him to step down from House leadership\u2014perhaps because the University\u2019s data show a significant number of internal cases of sexual harassment or assault, many emanating from the College. Sullivan, clinical professor of law and Johnston lecturer on law (he directs the Harvard Criminal Justice Institute and the Harvard Trial Advocacy Workshop) and a practicing trial attorney with a penchant for hard cases, made the argument that everyone is entitled to Donate 3/15/25, 12:46 Winthrop House tensions and government department concerns | Harvard Magazine 1/4 counsel\u2014an argument strongly endorsed subsequently by many of his Law School colleagues in a letter to The Boston Globe separate House officer is designated as students\u2019 contact person for discussing sexual-assault issues.) Cutting much closer to home, Sullivan was subsequently quoted by Stuart Taylor Jr., J.D. \u201977, in a long report for RealClearInvestigations, as sharply critical of Harvard\u2019s conduct and processes in its widely reported investigation of Lee professor of economics and professor of education Roland G. Fryer Jr. for allegedly sexually harassing his research staff. Faculty of Arts and Sciences dean Claudine Gay told The Harvard Crimson that Sullivan\u2019s response to students, centering on the argument about legal representation, did not fully address continuing concerns about the faculty dean\u2019s role, academically and pastorally, within the House. Harvard College dean Rakesh Khurana, who defended Sullivan\u2019s academic freedom to pursue his work, in late February asked former dean of freshmen Tom Dingman to conduct a confidential review of the \u201cclimate\u201d in Winthrop. Khurana cited concerns by residents about the \u201csupport that students can expect to receive,\u201d given Sullivan\u2019s legal work. (Data-gathering for the House survey concluded March 15, as the College headed into spring break.) The intramural tensions escalated considerably from there, as the Crimson reported that Sullivan had emailed House residents criticizing the paper\u2019s coverage of his legal work for Weinstein; he also granted an interview to The New Yorker in which he acknowledged that \u201csome students are concerned that people will be less inclined to speak about sexual assault in the House\u201d; noted his own past representation of women who were victims of sexual assault; and said, in response to a question about whether criticisms of him had been \u201cracially motivated,\u201d that they were\u2014and specifically \u201cthis climate survey. It\u2019s absolutely never happened before, and do not believe that it would happen again to any non-minority dean.\u201d He observed, \u201cThis is all some vicarious association with a client whom several in our community don\u2019t like. If that becomes the new standard\u2026then we\u2019re going to see continued threat\u201d to academic freedom and robust exchanges of ideas. Obviously, that wraps many issues into a charged environment for coming to terms with local allegations of sexual harassment or assault. Harvard\u2019s professional-school faculty members routinely pursue outside engagements, to keep current on developments within their fields. Little discussed in this 3/15/25, 12:46 Winthrop House tensions and government department concerns | Harvard Magazine 2/4 instance is whether the demands of Sullivan\u2019s involvement in complex criminal trials might raise questions about his (or any similar faculty dean\u2019s) time commitment to a House\u2019s resident undergraduates\u2014perhaps an issue for another, calmer day. Further muddying this situation is Sullivan\u2019s possible engagement with a faculty member (Fryer) being investigated through campus protocols, pitting various members of the community in difficult, cross-cutting positions toward one another. Results of the climate survey and further developments were pending as this issue went to press in early April. This uproar quickly superseded news of the government department\u2019s \u201cClimate Survey Report,\u201d released February 6, following the retirement last year of longtime professor Jorge Dom\u00ednguez in the wake of allegations of persistent sexual harassment\u2014which remain under investigation. The survey of faculty members, graduate students, undergraduate concentrators, and staff members found 35 percent of female graduate students dissatisfied with the department\u2014more than twice the rate among male peers. Some 12 percent of respondents reported harassment or discrimination, with women and graduate students more likely to report harassment. One-quarter of respondents (and 34 percent of graduate students, and 47 percent of women) disagreed, or strongly disagreed, that their mentors, teachers, and advisers are \u201csufficiently sensitive to diversity and inclusion.\u201d In disseminating the report ( department-climate-survey), chair Jennifer Hochschild, Jayne professor of government and professor of African and African American studies, wrote, \u201cWe are dismayed\u201d by the reports of \u201charassment, discrimination, or other impediments to success,\u201d and expressed her hope that the survey and other work undertaken by the department\u2019s Climate Change Committee \u201cwill facilitate improvement in what is inevitably a work in progress.\u201d Click here for the May-June 2019 issue table of contents Read more articles by John S. Rosenberg 3/15/25, 12:46 Winthrop House tensions and government department concerns | Harvard Magazine 3/4 3/15/25, 12:46 Winthrop House tensions and government department concerns | Harvard Magazine 4/4"} |
7,921 | Geoffrey Peters | William Mitchell College of Law | [
"7921_101.pdf",
"7921_102.pdf",
"7921_103.pdf"
] | {} |
7,216 | David Conz | Arizona State University | [
"7216_101.pdf",
"7216_102.pdf"
] | {} |
7,682 | David Maciel | University of California – Santa Cruz | [
"7682_101.pdf",
"7682_101.pdf"
] | {"7682_101.pdf": "David Maciel Visiting professor David Maciel repeatedly called female students for no professional reason, invited them consistently to coffee or lunch and engaged in unwanted hugging, kissing and touching, according to a Title investigation. The complainant alleged that during one meeting, Maciel said am not interested in you as a student am interested in you as a woman.\" Maciel denied romantic pursuits but did admit \"hugging and kissing students socially,\" according to the report. Maciel was dismissed. Campus: Los Angeles Complaint date: None Questions, comments or corrections? Email [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]). Data and code is open-source on GitHub ( Support innovative, independent student journalism. Donate today. ( Copyright \u00a9 2019 The Daily Californian, The Independent Berkeley Student Publishing Co., Inc."} |
7,815 | Robert Hildebrand | University of South Dakota | [
"7815_101.pdf",
"7815_101.pdf",
"7815_101.pdf"
] | {"7815_101.pdf": "Campus Sports Verve Opinion State/Local \ue943 \ue982 \ue943 \ue982 Subscribe Home / 2013 / January / Hilderbrand Resigns \ue9d2 Academics Campus Hilderbrand Resigns \uec45 \uec63 \uea760 Story by Megan Card and Katia Duszenko The mid-academic year resignation of tenured history professor Robert Hilderbrand Dec. 14 required students at the University of South Dakota to accept late adjustments made to their schedules that included new instructors and the replacement of a cancelled course. Prior to his resignation, Hilderbrand was served a subpoena Nov. 6 outside of East Hall to testify in a divorce filing between David Cowles, a May 2012 graduate of the Sanford School of Medicine, and his wife Sarah Cowles, a undergraduate, according to records obtained through Clay County\u2019s Clerk of Courts. January 30, 2013 Volante Staff \ueb5f 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 1/6 In his sworn affidavit, David Cowles said he discovered his wife of nearly nine years was having an affair with Hilderbrand statement he defends with copies of email exchanges made between the two \u201cwhich explicitly show the existence of their affair.\u201d David Cowles\u2019 filed for divorce from his wife, Sarah Cowles, Oct. 22. Hilderbrand\u2019s wife, Janet, a former employee, filed for divorce Nov. 26. David Cowles\u2019 affidavit in the divorce filing said Sarah Cowles was a student of Hilderbrand at the time of their affair. South Dakota Board of Regents policy 1:23 expressly states that university faculty members are not permitted to have consensual relationships with any student \u201cunder their academic supervision.\u201d When asked if Hilderbrand ever disclosed his relationship to the university, Provost Chuck Staben said because it is a personnel issue, he could not comment. The policy also states that if a faculty member fails to disclose their relationship or does not abide by assurances made to an institutional chief executive officer President James Abbott, the faculty member\u2019s lack of action will result in termination of employment. Again, Staben said it is a personnel issue and he said he preferred not to comment. He also said the way a person ends their employment with the university does not affect their eligibility for retirement benefits. Judith Sebesta, chair of the history department, said she could not comment on whether or not a student-teacher relationship affected Hilderbrand\u2019s decision to resign from his position. Sebesta also said Hilderbrand did not have to give a reason to retire when he did, and to her knowledge, he was planning to retire at the end of the semester anyway. Staben said it is unusual for professors to resign half-way through the academic year, but it does occur mainly for personal reasons. Staben defined a personnel matter as one that is private to the employee and the employer. All attempts made by The Volante to contact Sarah Cowles or Hilderbrand about his resignation or their relationship were met with no replies from the former professor and student. 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 2/6 In an email sent Jan. 16 to a Coyote News reporter in regards to discussing his departure, Hilderbrand responded that his retirement was \u201can intriguing process, with things about it that are (good) and bad.\u201d He declined the interview, and said he was traveling and would \u201cnot be available for an interview any time in the near future.\u201d Hilderbrand was sanctioned by the university for inappropriate behavior with a female student about 15 years prior to the Cowles\u2019 court case. According to a Feb. 26, 1997, article by The Volante administration stripped him of his position as history department chair, his role as the Truman scholarship adviser and his position as sole honors program coordinator after finding him guilty of sexually harassing a female student. The student\u2019s identity was protected because investigation records were closed, said the former Affirmative Action Director, Roberta Hakl. In October of 1996, the student signed a grievance, setting in motion the BOR\u2019s Human Rights Complaint Procedure. The Regents\u2019 policy dictated that the affirmative action office conduct an investigation month later, Hakl\u2019s investigation found Hilderbrand guilty of sexual harassment. David Cowles\u2019 filed affidavit also said he learned that Hilderbrand has had other affairs with former female students. Cowles, who left Vermillion last July for a one-year medical residency at the University of Kansas \u2013 Wichita, could not be reached after numerous attempts were made to contact him by The Volante. In regards to the 1997 incident, Staben said he was aware of the situation, but this prior incident did not affect Hilderbrand\u2019s decision to resign. In accordance to the BOR, any alleged violation of the faculty-student consensual relationship policy is subject to investigation and discipline. Staben declined to comment on whether or not the university investigated Hilderbrand and Sarah Cowles\u2019 relationship because it would be considered a personnel issue. While Hilderbrand was stripped of a number of his positions after being found guilty of sexual harassment in 1997, Staben said he does not know if Hilderbrand will be selected for emeritus status, because that action is conferred through the BOR, and their next meeting is not held until March. 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 3/6 Because of the privilege of the title and position, Staben said the granting of emeritus status means the will also look at all events that have occurred during a professor\u2019s career. Students are feeling the impact of Hilderbrand\u2019s sudden absence. According to History Professor David Burrow, Hilderbrand was set to teach several classes in the spring. Two of them have been reassigned to other professors, and one has been switched out for a different course. \u201cDr. Hilderbrand\u2019s graduate course, a readings seminar, is being taught by Dr. Molly Rozum,\u201d Burrow said. \u201cDr. Hilderbrand\u2019s U.S. History course is being taught by Dr. Sam Herley. Dr. Herley is also offering an upper division course, replacing Dr. Hilderbrand\u2019s 400-level course.\u201d Hilderbrand\u2019s 400-level course, a specialized class focused on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, was cancelled as a result of his resignation. In an email sent to students who were registered for the course, Judith Sebesta directed students toward Dr. Herley\u2019s replacement course, which examines post World War U.S. presidents. Sebesta also said all of Hilderbrand\u2019s former graduate advisees were reassigned Related Posts \uea2cPrevious: Students displaced after \u2026 Next: Three Wellness Center staff me\u2026 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 4/6 Campus Softball Goes 5-0 On The Weekend \uec45 \uec63 Addison Sporleder \uea760 Campus Senate Bill 100 Could Allow Concealed Carry on Public Universities \uec45 \uec63Elli Kruse \uea760 Campus Asian Students in America gather to share their culture with the community \uec45 \uec63Elli Kruse \uea760 2 March 5, 2025 March 5, 2025 March 5, 2025 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 5/6 Stay Connected About Copyright \u00a9 ogma blog 2025 Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: ogma-blog by Mystery Themes. Campus Sports Verve Opinion State/Local Letters to the Editor \uea55 Contact Us \uea55 Submit an Overheard \uea55 Subscribe \uea55 Submit News Tips \uea55 Coyote News 91.1 \uea55 Media & Journalism Department \uea55 3/15/25, 12:19 Hilderbrand resigns \u2013 The Volante 6/6"} |
7,482 | Vernon Traster | Ohio Northern University | [
"7482_101.pdf",
"7482_102.pdf",
"7482_103.pdf",
"7482_104.pdf",
"7482_105.pdf",
"7482_106.pdf",
"7482_107.pdf",
"7482_108.pdf",
"7482_109.pdf",
"7482_109.pdf",
"7482_109.pdf"
] | {"7482_109.pdf": "Home Law & Order Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students Advertisement 3/15/25, 11:40 Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students | Business Insider India 1/5 Chhath Puja 2024 Wishes Bank holidays in India ChatGPT will let you create images for free Should the government give freebies to the poor? World\u2019s most powerful passports Jio vs Airtel vs Vi Prepaid Plans Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students Abby Rogers Jan 14 2013 08:09 Best printers for Home Best Mixer Grinder Best wired Earphones Best 43 Inch in India Best Wi Fi Routers Best Home Theatre in India Smart Watch under 5000 Best Laptops for Education Best Laptop for Students 3/15/25, 11:40 Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students | Business Insider India 2/5 Wikipedia Tilton Hall at Law law professor is suing the school that suspended him after he was accused of sexually harassing a student and a staff member. In his lawsuit, tenured professor Vernon Traster claims Ohio Northern University wrongfully suspended him because he was at the top of the pay scale. The school claims he was suspended because he posed a safety risk to students and staff, The Lima News reported last week. Traster, 65, has worked at the university for 36 years but was suspended without pay in March after school officials said he sexually harassed a student at his home and a staff member at her home. The student claims Traster \"asked her questions of a sexual nature and inappropriately touched her\" while she was working on university-related matters at his house, Lima News reported. Law Order 1 min read 3/15/25, 11:40 Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students | Business Insider India 3/5 The staff member claims Traster asked to come to her house to discuss his divorce and then tried to kiss and touch her. But Traster is saying the university tried to suspend him because he's too expensive and is claiming age and sex discrimination. He is asking for more than $75,000 in damages including back pay, according to the News. Neither Traster's lawyer nor the university immediately responded to Business Insider's request for comment. Ohio Northern University Claude W. Pettit College of Law is a non-ranked private law school with 311 students and 27 full- and part-time faculty members, according to U.S. News Education MISS: Mom Sues High School Over Half-Naked Pictures Of Her Daughter On Twitter Law Students Sexual Harassment Law And Order Lawsuits Law Schools 3/15/25, 11:40 Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students | Business Insider India 4/5 3/15/25, 11:40 Professor Sues Law School That Called Him Safety Risk For Students | Business Insider India 5/5"} |
8,294 | James Smith | Southern University | [
"8294_101.pdf",
"8294_102.pdf",
"8294_103.pdf",
"8294_104.pdf",
"8294_105.pdf",
"8294_106.pdf",
"8294_107.pdf",
"8294_101.pdf",
"8294_103.pdf",
"8294_105.pdf",
"8294_106.pdf",
"8294_104.pdf",
"8294_107.pdf",
"8294_101.pdf",
"8294_103.pdf",
"8294_105.pdf",
"8294_106.pdf",
"8294_104.pdf",
"8294_107.pdf"
] | {"8294_101.pdf": "75\u00b0 Baton Rouge 5 Weather Alerts In Effect \uf00d \uf0c9 News Watch Live Video (WAFB) - The cheerleading coach at Southern University has resigned after reportedly being accused of sexual misconduct. James Smith, the head coach for Southern's cheer team, resigned last week, a spokesperson with Southern confirms. The allegations were presented to the university by two students. Smith was notified and immediately resigned, the spokesperson says. Smith was a part-time employee at the university. East Baton Rouge School System Superintendent Warren Drake confirms Smith is also the principal at Brookstown Middle Magnet Academy. The school system said it has placed Smith on administrative leave pending further investigation. Southern is also conducting its own internal investigation. Copyright 2018 WAFB. All rights reserved. Most Read Cheerleading coach at Southern resigns after sexual misconduct allegations, placed on leave as middle school principal Cheerleading coach at Southern University resigns after sexual misconduct allegations By Rachael Thomas Published: Feb. 8, 2018 at 10:31 | Updated: Feb. 9, 2018 at 10:08 \uf144 I-TEAM: Arrest warrant issued for school administrator who allegedly forced child to clean up feces 3/15/25, 12:39 Cheerleading coach at Southern resigns after sexual misconduct allegations, placed on leave as middle school principal 1/3 \uf144 Memorial for Caleb Wilson held at Southern University \uf144 Accused gunman in Southern University dorm shooting arrested in Texas DAY: Severe weather outbreak expected across the Deep South \uf144 Body of missing truck driver recovered from Mississippi River \uf144 Crime Stoppers tip leads to arrest of New Orleans shooting suspect in Baton Rouge \uf144 Legendary Coach Skip Bertman\u2019s wife, Sandy, passes away Truckload of stolen packages recovered near Plank Road 3/15/25, 12:39 Cheerleading coach at Southern resigns after sexual misconduct allegations, placed on leave as middle school principal 2/3 Public Inspection File Applications [email protected] - (225) 215-4703 Terms of Service Privacy Policy Statement Advertising Digital Marketing Closed Captioning/Audio Description At Gray, our journalists report, write, edit and produce the news content that informs the communities we serve. Click here to learn more about our approach to artificial intelligence Gray Local Media Station \u00a9 2002-2025 News First Alert Weather Sports Programming Politics Job Openings 844 Government Street Baton Rouge 70802 (225) 383-9999 3/15/25, 12:39 Cheerleading coach at Southern resigns after sexual misconduct allegations, placed on leave as middle school principal 3/3", "8294_103.pdf": "Abstract Reports the results of a questionnaire survey designed to identify factors contributing to sexual misconduct of a sample of senior Southern Baptist pastors. Concludes that stress and sexual misconduct are significantly correlated and that pastors less confident in their training are more likely to engage in sexual misconduct than those confident in their training. Offers a list of guidelines for individual ministers to follow to reduce the likelihood of sexual misconduct taking place. Notes implications for pastoral care and for theological seminaries and judicatories in their efforts to confront the problem of sexual misconduct among clergy. \udb64\ude66 \udb64\ude67 \udb64\ude68 \udb64\ude69 Get full access to this article View all access and purchase options for this article. Get Access \udb64\udf24 You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate. Impact Factor: 0.8 5-Year Impact Factor: 0.8 Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications \udb64\udebbContents \udb64\ude66 \udb64\ude67 \udb64\ude68 \udb64\ude69Get access \udb64\udcffMore 3/15/25, 12:39 The Prevalence and Contributing Factors of Sexual Misconduct among Southern Baptist Pastors in Six Southern States - Jeff T. S\u2026 1/2 Download Also from Sage Library Elevating debate Sage Data Uncovering insight Sage Business Cases Shaping futures Sage Campus Unleashing potential Sage Knowledge Multimedia learning resources Sage Research Methods Supercharging research Sage Video Streaming knowledge Technology from Sage Library digital services 3/15/25, 12:39 The Prevalence and Contributing Factors of Sexual Misconduct among Southern Baptist Pastors in Six Southern States - Jeff T. S\u2026 2/2", "8294_105.pdf": "by: Carly Laing Posted: Feb 9, 2018 / 03:24 Updated: Feb 9, 2018 / 03:54 Southern University is without a head cheerleading coach after head Coach James Smith resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct. According to a university spokesperson, two students brought the allegations against Smith to the university this week. Smith resigned shortly after learning about the allegations. Smith worked part time at Southern as the cheerleading coach but he\u2019s also the principal of Brookstown Middle Magnet School in East Baton Rouge Parish. We\u2019ve reached out to the Southern\u2019s cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 75 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 1/10 school board who says they are now conducting their own investigation. UPDATE: The East Baton Rouge School System has placed Mr. Smith on administrative leave pending further investigation. Suggest a Correction Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. These spring-cleaning tools will make cleanup a breeze / 24 Hours Ago Spring cleaning is that special time of year when you dive in and eradicate household grime. These are the right tools to help you do your best work > Next > Cancel \u2715 Next story in > Cancel Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 2/10 Ninja appliances are up to 40% off right now / 1 Day Ago If spring\u2019s arrival has you feeling like making a fresh start in the kitchen, now\u2019s the time \u2014 Ninja\u2019s popular, high-tech appliances are on sale. Pet products rule Walmart\u2019s Flash Deals this week > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 3/10 / 1 Day Ago Walmart has a ton of amazing deals on pet products this week, so you can treat your pet to something nice \u2014 without breaking the bank. View All BestReviews Trump signs order to cut staff at Voice of America \u2026 Large crowds converge in Belgrade for protest rally \u2026 1 killed in Baker shooting Friday night > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 4/10 Top Stories Trump signs order to cut staff at Voice of America \u2026 Greek government debt raised to investment grade \u2026 Large crowds converge in Belgrade for protest rally \u2026 1 killed in Baker shooting Friday night Monster storm sparks tornado & fire threat, kills \u2026 Starmer challenges Putin to prove he is serious about \u2026 Millions of Cubans remain without power after substation \u2026 Driverless \u2018bus of the future\u2019 is tested in Barcelona More Stories Monster storm sparks tornado & fire threat, kills \u2026 Starmer challenges Putin to prove he is serious about > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 5/10 1 killed in Baker shooting Friday night East Baton Rouge Parish 9 mins ago Denham Springs St. Patrick\u2019s Day Parade canceled Livingston Parish 1 hour ago Louisiana faith leaders urge Gov. Landry to halt \u2026 News 14 hours ago Scotlandville mourns loss of teen killed in shooting Local News 14 hours ago man sentenced to life for 2016 murder Baton Rouge 19 hours ago Man faces attempted murder, drive-by shooting charges Local Crime 24 hours ago GoFundMe created for family of teen fatally shot Baton Rouge 1 day ago Severe weather threat: What you need to know Weather 15 mins ago View All Local News \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 Stay up to date with the latest news by downloading the BRProud App from the App Store or Google Play. Louisiana First News Video > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 6/10 More Videos 1 1 killed in Baker shooting Friday night 2 Crawfish prices go up for St. Patrick\u2019s Day weekend 3 Former power plant now space for stores, restaurants 4 Does Louisiana tax Social Security? Here\u2019s what you Walmart\u2019s \u2018Flash Deals\u2019 are filled with hidden gems \u2026 Holiday 2 days ago > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 7/10 LouisianaFirstNews.com partners with 44 and Local 33 to bring you the latest in Baton Rouge news, sports, weather and more. Home Local News Gifts and goodies every kid will want in their Easter \u2026 Holiday 2 days ago Easter basket ideas that teens won\u2019t hate Holiday 2 days ago Le Creuset, Ninja and more top Amazon\u2019s \u2018hot\u2019 \u2026 Holiday 3 days ago Easter sets are perfect basket-fillers Holiday 3 days ago Ulta\u2019s 21 Days of Beauty sale is live now Holiday 3 days ago View All BestReviews Picks Louisiana First Daily News Enter Your Email > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 8/10 Weather Sports Contact Us Advertise With Us Public File Public File Public File Public File Public File Nexstar Certification Get News App Get Weather App Stay Connected Privacy Policy 11/18/2024 Terms Of Use Applications Public File Assistance Contact The Hill NewsNation BestReviews Content Licensing Nexstar Digital > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 9/10 Journalistic Integrity Sitemap Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information \u00a9 1998 - 2025 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved > Next > Next story in > Next story in 3/15/25, 12:40 Southern's cheerleading coach resigns amid sexual misconduct allegations 10/10", "8294_106.pdf": "ROUGE, La part-time cheerleading coach at a Louisiana college has resigned amid allegations of sexual harassment. The Advocate of Baton Rouge reports James Smith, who\u2019s also the principal of Brookstown Middle School, resigned from Southern University last week. Southern University spokeswoman Janene Tate says two students have accused Smith, who worked with university\u2019s cheerleaders for more than 20 years, of \u201cinappropriate sexual contact.\u201d Tate says is conducting an internal investigation even though Smith resigned immediately after learning of the allegations. East Baton Rouge Parish School System spokesman Taylor Gast says Smith still is the principal of the middle school and that the system didn\u2019t know about any allegations against him. Tate says will complete its internal investigation in 60 days per federal Title requirements. ___ Information from: The Advocate, Louisiana cheer coach accused of sexual harassment resigns Updated 4:58 CDT, February 9, 2018 Deadly weather \u2018Ted Lasso\u2019 Season 4 SpaceX launch Streaming now Ohtani in Japan 3/15/25, 12:40 Louisiana cheer coach accused of sexual harassment resigns News 1/2 1 Trump says he was being a \u2018bit sarcastic\u2019 when he promised to end Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours 2 More than 50 universities face federal investigations as part of Trump\u2019s anti campaign 3 Appeals court lifts blocks on Trump\u2019s orders restricting diversity, equity and inclusion programs 4 Democratic Party fractures in government shutdown fight, with anger running high 5 Rubio says South Africa\u2019s ambassador to the \u2018is no longer welcome\u2019 in the country 3/15/25, 12:40 Louisiana cheer coach accused of sexual harassment resigns News 2/2", "8294_104.pdf": "misconduct-allegations/article_9acb4d6e-0d87-11e8-af4d-6fcafa527061.html Middle school principal resigns as cheerleading coach amid sexual misconduct allegations Feb 9, 2018 James Smith ROUGE, LA) - Southern University's head cheerleading coach has resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct Thursday. According to a university spokesperson, two students accused Head Coach James Smith of inappropriate behavior. Smith immediately resigned upon being notified of the accusations Thursday. An investigation into the matter is ongoing. Smith also works as a principal at Brookstown Middle Magnet Academy Superintendent Warren Drake says Smith will not be at the school Friday and will instead report to Human Resources. Report a typo on this article", "8294_107.pdf": "allegations-as-southern-cheerleading-coach/article_df05c296-0d25-11e8-aed9-8fa5ab7a4375.html principal on leave amid sexual misconduct allegations as Southern cheerleading coach Baton Rouge principal on leave amid sexual misconduct allegations as Southern cheerleading coach | [email protected] Feb 8, 2018 James E. Smith Sr XMIT: BAT1710121600391450 (10 a.m. Friday, Feb. 9) East Baton Rouge Parish School System officials announced Friday morning that Brookstown Middle School principal James Smith has been placed on administrative leave as the system investigates, according to school system spokeswoman Taylor Gast. Assistant Principal Cindy Grimmer act as principal for the immediate future. Original story part-time cheerleading coach at Southern University \u2014 who is currently the principal of an East Baton Rouge middle school \u2014 resigned last week from the university after he was confronted by administrators with accusations that he sexually harassed two college students, a spokesperson for the university confirmed Thursday. James Smith, the cheerleading coach, remains employed as principal of Brookstown Middle School, said East Baton Rouge Parish School System spokesman Taylor Gast, adding that the system was unaware of the allegations against their employee. But Gast later added that after being alerted by an Advocate reporter, school officials were opening up an investigation and Smith would not be reporting to school on Friday. Smith, who has worked with the university's cheerleaders for more than 20 years, was accused of \"inappropriate sexual contact\" by two students, said Janene Tate, Southern University spokeswoman Smith immediately resigned when notified about the allegations against him, but the university is moving forward with its own internal investigation, Tate said. She said the school will complete its investigation within 60 days, per federal Title requirements. Smith became principal of Brookstown Middle School in 2015. He previously served as assistant principal at Glasgow Middle School. Gast said the school system had been unaware of any allegations of misconduct or an investigation at Southern University. \"We were not aware until the story broke,\" Gast said. \"Please allow us some time to gather more information. We will be investigating the matter further.\" Tate said Thursday evening she was unclear whether the university had notified the parish school system about the investigation. Smith could not immediately be reached for comment. Advocate staff writer Charles Lussier contributed to this report. Brookstown Middle School principal placed on leave in wake sexual harassment allegations at outside coaching job"} |
8,914 | Jim Feagin | California State University - Fullerton | [
"8914_101.pdf",
"8914_101.pdf"
] | {"8914_101.pdf": "Date(s) of Incident Complainant Status Respondent Name Respondent Position Summary of Substantiated Allegation(s) Outcome Multiple dates between March 2015 through October 2016; investigation finalized on 6/7/2017 Faculty Charlie Bialowas Faculty Respondent found responsible for Sexual Harassment. Employee resigned from his position 2/4/2018. March 29, 2019 Student Kwang-Ping (Patricia) Cheng Faculty Respondent didn't hire Complainant due to his disability issued 2/14/2020. Multiple dates during the 2010- 2011 Academic Year; investigation finalized on 4/6/2017 Staff Jim Feagin Faculty Respondent found responsible for Sexual Harassment issued on 5/23/2017."} |
7,229 | Trent Dougherty | Baylor University | [
"7229_101.pdf",
"7229_102.pdf",
"7229_103.pdf",
"7229_104.pdf",
"7229_105.pdf",
"7229_106.pdf",
"7229_105.pdf",
"7229_106.pdf",
"7229_105.pdf",
"7229_106.pdf"
] | {"7229_105.pdf": "\u00bb Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) By Justin Weinberg. September 28, 2018 at 5:01 pm An investigation at Baylor University has determined that Trent Dougherty, a philosophy professor there since 2009 who specializes in philosophy of religion, violated the school\u2019s Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy. Dougherty resigned from the University earlier this week, [added after post was updated:] though according to a philosophy faculty member, \u201ctenured members of the department were prepared to initiate a dismissal hearing against him in the event he did not resign 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 1/7 building on the Baylor campus According to a statement from the Department of Philosophy at Baylor, there were multiple allegations against Dougherty, and he was found responsible on \u201csome allegations.\u201d The allegations for which he was found responsible were made by more than one complainant. There were also \u201cadditional concerns under other Baylor policies\u201d. At the moment, it is not public knowledge which elements of the Sexual and Gender- Based Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy Baylor found Dougherty to have violated. The policy prohibits sexual assault, non-consensual sexual contact, sexual harassment, gender-based harassment, sexual exploitation, intimate partner violence, stalking, and retaliation. Here is the statement from the Department of Philosophy, in full 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 2/7 Dr. Trent Dougherty has resigned his position as tenured Associate Professor of Philosophy at Baylor University. Dr. Dougherty was recently the subject of several complaints under Baylor\u2019s Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Title IX). He was found \u201cresponsible\u201d on some allegations involving more than one complainant and \u201cnot responsible\u201d on others. The investigation revealed additional concerns under other Baylor policies. The Department of Philosophy expresses its deep appreciation for the courage of the Complainants in coming forward, for their willingness to make their complaints known, and for their patient participation in the process. The Philosophy Department reaffirms its position that it does not tolerate behavior by members of our community that violate Baylor\u2019s Title policy or engage in misconduct that violates other Baylor policies, whether directed toward our current or former students, toward our colleagues, or toward peers at other institutions. We also take this occasion to reaffirm our dedication to Baylor University\u2019s mission, to integrate \u201cacademic excellence and Christian commitment within a caring community.\u201d The Philosophy Department commits itself to careful examination of our community practices and to the correction of any practices that we determine are not in alignment with our mission. The statement is also posted on the department\u2019s website 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 3/7 Trent Dougherty was found to have violated Baylor University\u2019s Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy 1: Dougherty has written a public Facebook post in which he claims to have received a large financial settlement from Baylor resulting from a lawsuit he filed against the school. He also appears to reveal that at least some of the allegations against him involved sexual harassment, which he says were used as \u201cweapons\u201d against him because of his political views. He also suggests that the settlement is \u201chush money\u201d paid to him by Baylor because of \u201ctheir violations of due process, their breaches of confidentiality, and general heavy-handedness 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 4/7 He has deleted several comments from the post that either object to or ask pointed questions about his remarks, or link to news accounts about the investigation\u2019s findings, such as have not yet been able to confirm any of Dougherty\u2019s claims about his lawsuit or its settlement [added: see Update 2 \u2014 it is being reported that there was no lawsuit]. In a conversation about this investigation this past summer asked Dougherty, \u201cDo you think you\u2019ve been treated fairly so far by the Title investigative process?\u201d He replied 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 5/7 \u201cFor the most part yes mean for the most part it\u2019s just here\u2019s what somebody said what do you have to say, but there have Been a few things I\u2019ve complained about.\u201d Responding to Dougherty, Thomas Ward, assistant professor of philosophy at Baylor, writes, in a public Facebook post: Trent Dougherty must know that the faculty members of the Baylor philosophy department believe and, as of today, have told our graduate students, that Trent resigned from Baylor, that the tenured members of the department were prepared to initiate a dismissal hearing against him in the event he did not resign, and that they believe the Title investigations were conducted thoroughly and objectively would be interested to know whether Trent thinks the faculty members of the philosophy department are lying, or whether he thinks they are misinformed, or whether he has some other explanation of their words in today\u2019s public statement on the philosophy department\u2019s website and or in today\u2019s meeting with graduate students 2 (8:13pm): Baylor denies Dougherty had filed any lawsuit against the school, according to an article in the Baylor Lariat, which also reports that the funds Dougherty received from the school were part of a severance agreement, and come to just over $30,000 (before taxes and attorney fees): Baylor refuted some of Dougherty\u2019s claims in a statement to the Lariat Friday evening, saying there was no lawsuit between the university and the professor. An unnamed source with knowledge of the separation agreement said Dougherty is not eligible for rehire at Baylor, and he has relinquished his tenure as part of the agreement. The source also said Dougherty is receiving severance pay through Dec. 31 and the total amount he will get in the agreement is just over $30,000 before taxes and attorney fees. That source added taking Dougherty through the typical tenure revocation process would have lasted many, many months, and the agreement was the most expedited way to get him off the Baylor campus 3 (9:03pm): Another faculty member at Baylor confirms that the tenured philosophy faculty were planning to meet to vote on whether to initiate termination proceedings for Dougherty\u2014a power departments have at Baylor\u2014when they 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 6/7 learned of his resignation. Dougherty has removed the aforementioned public Facebook post 4 (9/30/18): Centexproud.com, a local Texas news site, has published a statement from Dougherty. It is full of misleading statements, outright lies, and laughable attempts to depict himself as a hero and holier-than-thou victim have a screen shot of the statement here, just in case it disappears from its original home on the web may be able to share more details about the Dougherty case later this week but for now, suffice it to say that the allegations for which he was found by Baylor to be responsible are very serious and are nowhere near captured by his admissions of being \u201cnot careful\u201d and \u201cnot pure as the wind-driven snow.\u201d Comments are closed on this post but if you have relevant information, email it to me at [email protected] 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor: Dougherty Responsible for Violating Sexual Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy (Several Updates) - Daily Nous 7/7", "7229_106.pdf": "\ueddb \uf0e714 weather alerts \uf002 \uf26c Watch Now Quick links... Posted 8:01 PM, Sep 28, 2018 and last updated 10:26 AM, Sep 29, 2018 Baylor University professor resigns amid 'several' Title complaints \uf09a\ue61b\uf0e0 undefined undefined Menu 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor University professor resigns amid 'several' Title complaints 1/3 tenured professor from Baylor University has resigned amid several Title complaints against him. The Baylor Philosophy department announced Friday that Dr. Trent Dougherty resigned from his position as Associate Professor of Philosophy. The department said in a news release that Dougherty was the subject of multiple complaints under Baylor's Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment and Interpersonal Violence Policy. Dougherty was found to be \"responsible\" on some of the allegations. The department released a statement, saying: The Department of Philosophy expresses its deep appreciation for the courage of the Complainants in coming forward, for their willingness to make their complaints known, and for their patient participation in the process. The investigation also found additional concerns under \"other Baylor policies.\" Copyright 2018 KXXV. All rights reserved. Copyright 2018 KXXV. All rights reserved. Sign up for the Headlines Newsletter and receive up to date information. E-mail Submit 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor University professor resigns amid 'several' Title complaints 2/3 \ueddb Watch News Sports Weather Traffic Don't Waste Your Money Support Sitemap Do Not Sell My Info Privacy Policy Privacy Center Journalism Ethics Guidelines Terms of Use Careers Public File Public File Application Public File Contact Us Accessibility Statement Scripps Media Trust Center Closed Captioning Contact Scripps Local Media \u00a9 2025 Scripps Media, Inc Give Light and the People Will Find Their Own Way 7:14 PM, Feb 05, 2019 In Your Neighborhood \uf09a \uf16d \ue61b 3/15/25, 11:01 Baylor University professor resigns amid 'several' Title complaints 3/3"} |
7,376 | Herb Maschner | Idaho State University | [
"7376_101.pdf",
"7376_102.pdf",
"7376_103.pdf",
"7376_104.pdf",
"7376_105.pdf",
"7376_102.pdf",
"7376_103.pdf",
"7376_102.pdf",
"7376_103.pdf"
] | {"7376_102.pdf": "News Andrew Crighton - Editor-in-Chief Emeritus \uf017 December 5, 2016 Andrew Crighton News Editor Herb Maschner, the former Director of the Idaho Museum of Natural History who was subject to a sexual harassment lawsuit has been stripped of his title and duties at his new position at the University of South Florida. After a judge upheld the case against and Maschner filed by Kelly Pokorny, Maschner was actively recruited by as Executive Director of the Center for Virtualization and Applied Spatial Technologies in August of 2015. Maschner did not inform his new employers of the sexual harassment until over a year later. The Tampa Bay Times has reported that this was due to Maschner learning that an Idaho newspaper was about to publish an article about the impending court date. After this information became public at USF, faculty members of the College of Arts and Sciences and Department of Anthropology met to The Bengal The Independent Voice of Idaho State University Since 1910. \uf186 \uf002 Home \uf054News 3/15/25, 11:25 \u2013 The Bengal isubengal.com/maschner-stripped-title-usf/ 1/5 discuss the issue on October 28. After a unanimous vote, the Department of Anthropology submitted a letter to its dean requesting that Maschner be distanced from the department under fears that it could harm the department\u2019s reputation and future recruiting. In mid November, Maschner was informed that he would be stripped of his title and any duties inside of his department, he would keep his benefits and $195,000 salary for at least 90 days after this decision. His permanent employment and position will be determined after further consultation between him and the university administrators came under fire concerning hiring practices after this information came clear. University spokesperson Lara Wade said that the hiring of Maschner did not include the usual reference checks or met with individual faculty members has had issues with not maintaining strong hiring practices. In late June of this year removed Samuel Bradley from the position of Director of the Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications. Bradley was hired in 2013, and did not check with his former employers at Texas Tech University, where Bradley resigned amid an investigation of have inappropriate relationships with students. Last year, Hans Reichgelt resigned from his position as Regional Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs for St. Petersburg\u2019s after sexually harassing a professor under his supervision. \uf073Posted in News Andrew Crighton - Editor-in-Chief Emeritus News Submitted Articles Next Post \uf054 3/15/25, 11:25 \u2013 The Bengal isubengal.com/maschner-stripped-title-usf/ 2/5 \uf017 February 20, 2013 Author to visit \uf017 January 24, 2019 Update You May Like \uf017Tue Dec 6 , 2016 Pocatello\u2019s Second Saturday contra dance will be held December 10 with Mike Cottle from Salt Lake City teaching and calling the dances, with live music from the Bellows Fellows (David Combs and David Sealander, accordions) playing the lively New England contra tunes. The beginners\u2019 session at 7:30 pm is highly 3/15/25, 11:25 \u2013 The Bengal isubengal.com/maschner-stripped-title-usf/ 3/5 \uf017 October 31, 2019 Homeless Stand Down offers resources for the homeless of Southeast\u2026 \uf017 February 14, 2018 \uf017 February 27, 2013 Murder Mystery in March \uf017 September 11, 2019 in-line with national trend of rising tuition Get in Touch! [email protected] (208) 282-2247 921 S. 8th Ave., Stop 8123 Pocatello 83209-8009 News Life Sports Opinion Contact Us Distribution Jobs at The Bengal 3/15/25, 11:25 \u2013 The Bengal isubengal.com/maschner-stripped-title-usf/ 4/5 About The Bengal Terms of Use Privacy Policy 3/15/25, 11:25 \u2013 The Bengal isubengal.com/maschner-stripped-title-usf/ 5/5", "7376_103.pdf": "For an academic who can\u2019t keep his hands off the co-eds, friends with funds sure do come in handy. That\u2019s the takeaway from the tawdry tale of the University of South Florida\u2019s Herb Maschner. The aptly named anthropologist left his longtime professional home at Idaho State University for USF, bringing with him a long-standing relationship with the well-endowed Hitz Foundation. Dazzled administrators didn\u2019t ask about skeletons in the closet, and Maschner didn\u2019t disclose that he was on the wrong end of a sexual harassment claim. The accusations leveled by a graduate student under his supervision had been investigated, and sustained, leaving Maschner hot to trot out of Idaho made him an offer which included tenure, a $57,000 raise to $195,000; and a background check that wouldn\u2019t pass muster at a well-managed burger joint. Soon after Maschner arrived in Tampa, the Hitz Foundation ponied up $4.6 million for a Center for Virtualization and Applied Spatial Technologies\u201d with Maschner as its executive director. USF\u2019s Herb Maschner loses title, but USF\u2019s Herb Maschner loses title, but not money not money Debuting today: The Spring 2025 edition of Magazine featuring the Rising Stars of Florida Politics They might have all lived happily ever but for Idaho State quibbling about money with Maschner\u2019s victim trial is set for December, and the pesky press in Idaho was writing about the case, forcing Maschner to at last come clean at USF. Pesky Anastasia Dawson of the Tampa Bay Times broke the sordid story to taxpayers east of the Mississippi, forcing to assemble a Committee to Add Insult to Injury. Weeks of dithering followed. Administrators eventually stripped Maschner of his fancy title, but not his fancy salary, and promptly took cover behind the skirts of an unfortunate spokeswoman. Lara Wade emailed the Times with the ludicrous claim that taking Maschner\u2019s name off the letterhead \u201cwill facilitate greater productivity and success for him and his colleagues,\u201d by which she means that \u201cfaculty members at the center \u2026 will report to their department chairs instead of Maschner, who has \u201calso has been stripped of all governance responsibilities, such as committee assignments or evaluative functions \u2026\u201d The anthropology faculty is rightly concerned that \u201cthe negative publicity would affect the reputation of their department and harm recruitment\u201d and wants the administration to \u201c\u2026 identify a way to disassociate our department from professor Herb Maschner and to rescind his membership in the department immediately.\u201d That may be too little, too late, but it\u2019s not too much to ask of a university that aspires to \u201cpreeminence.\u201d Florence Snyder Herb Maschner Idaho State University Sexual Harassment University Of South Florida Center For Virtualization And Applied Spatial Technologies Related Articles \uf133November 21, 2016 \uf0174 min Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media. Publisher: Peter Schorsch @PeterSchorschFL Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Drew Dixon, Roseanne Dunkelberger, Liam Fineout, A.G. Gancarski, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Cole Pepper, Andrew Powell, Jesse Scheckner, Janelle Taylor, James Uthmeier says office will stand down on defending under-21 gun buy ban University of South Florida among 50 universities probed for by Department of Education Democrats confront limits of their minority power after bruising shutdown vote Florence Snyder Florence Beth Snyder is a Tallahassee-based lawyer and consultant Petition seeks more time to file Hurricane Matthew-related flood insurance claims For Ben Diamond, Wengay Newton, a time of learning and outreach \ue684 Drew Wilson, and Mike Wright. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL Phone: (727) 642-3162 Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182 St. Petersburg, Florida 33704 Home Elections Culture Wars Legislative Communities Federal Foreign Affairs Emails & Opinions Subscribe"} |
7,751 | Toshiki Itoh | University of Iowa | [
"7751_101.pdf",
"7751_102.pdf",
"7751_103.pdf",
"7751_104.pdf",
"7751_105.pdf",
"7751_101.pdf",
"7751_102.pdf",
"7751_103.pdf",
"7751_104.pdf",
"7751_101.pdf",
"7751_102.pdf",
"7751_103.pdf",
"7751_104.pdf"
] | {"7751_101.pdf": "Former professor to serve probation, jail time for assault, sex abuse woman said Friday in a victim impact statement she suffered severe physical injuries and continues to have emotional and psychological pain from the physical and sexual assaults inflicted by former University of Iowa assistant pathology professor Toshiki Itoh have seen a mental health professional for most of one year in order to help me deal with these problems,\u201d the University of Iowa research assistant and Japanese native said in the statement am ashamed of what happened to me, so do not want to see people, especially from my home country.\u201d Itoh was sentenced Friday to a two-year suspended sentence and two years probation for assault with intent to commit sexual abuse, an aggravated misdemeanor, and 365 days in jail with all but seven days suspended for two counts of assault causing bodily injury. He will serve his seven days in jail starting May 10 at the Johnson County Jail. Itoh will also have to serve a 10-year special parole after his regular sentences, register as a sex offender, complete a sex offender treatment program, and pay $865 in victim's restitution and all court fines and costs. The judge also placed a five year no-contact order for the victim. Itoh was convicted by a jury on two counts of assault causing bodily injury last October, and pleaded guilty to assault with intent to commit sexual abuse last month. Sixth Judicial District Judge Paul Miller presided over the sentencing on the sex abuse charge because Itoh pleaded guilty before him, and Judge Denver Dillard presided over the assault sentencing because he was the trial judge last year. Both judges denied the defense's request for deferred judgment on both sentences. Dillard told Itoh many defendants in court have little education, have mental health issues or were abused as a child. Their conduct is more understandable than Itoh's, he said. \u201cYou are not justified for your actions and the blame rests with you \u2013 not (the victim),\u201d Dillard said. \u201cShe talked about feeling shame. If you don't feel shame, you should.\u201d The research assistant worked as Itoh's lab assistant for three or four years. She testified during the trial that Itoh beat her on several occasions between January 2007 and July 2008. He repeatedly punched her in the face and sometimes twisted her breast until she bled. The woman also said Itoh sexually abused her but she never told anyone about the abuse until the incident in July 2008, according to testimony. She was in the United States on a work visa and feared she would lose her job if she complained. The woman, who has a master's degree from the University of Kansas and a Ph in chemical engineering from the University of Connecticut, said in the statement today that when Itoh and another professor changed her job from research assistant to a post- doctoral scholar, she had to continue working with Itoh, and if he fired her she would be deported. \u201cThis meant could not get away from Dr. Itoh, even if had known how to do so,\u201d she said. The woman said she continues to suffer from psychological problems from the abuse. She's afraid of people and can't watch or read any earthquake or tsunami news about her country or other areas. She can't read about or see others who have also been victimized, she said. Trish Mehaffey Apr. 22, 2011 2:00 pm Why you can trust The Gazette Toshiki Itoh, former assistant pathology professor at the University of Iowa, resigned after being convicted of assaulting a female lab worker Photo/University of Iowa) 3/15/25, 12:14 Former professor to serve probation, jail time for assault, sex abuse | The Gazette 1/2 This entire incident has not only affected her personal life but her professional life, she said. The experiments and research she and Itoh worked on will never be published because they would require Itoh's consent and Itoh quit working on the research when he was put on administrative leave. Itoh resigned from his position in January. He had been with the university for five years and had been in the United States for 11 years. Whether Itoh, who's not a U.S. citizen, will serve those sentences is unknown. All the offenses are \u201cdeportable offenses,\u201d and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement could step in after Itoh is sentenced. 3/15/25, 12:14 Former professor to serve probation, jail time for assault, sex abuse | The Gazette 2/2", "7751_102.pdf": "Get The News You Care Most About \u2014 Ad Free. Support HuffPost Today. See More Toshiki Itoh, University Of Iowa Assistant Professor, Resigns After Assault Conviction University Of Iowa Assistant Professor Resigns Following Assault Conviction Feb 23, 2011, 03:48 Updated May 25, 2011 Support Us 3/15/25, 12:14 Toshiki Itoh, University Of Iowa Assistant Professor, Resigns After Assault Conviction | HuffPost College 1/4 University of Iowa assistant professor Toshiki Itoh resigned from his post after a two-and-a-half year stint on paid leave -- which was prompted by accusations of attacking a laboratory assistant, reports the Daily Iowan. Itoh, 47, had been on administrative leave since July 2008, when his lab assistant accused him of hitting, kicking and performing non- consensual sex acts on her. Although Itoh was banned from campus following his placement on leave, he retained his $93,000 annual salary. In an October 2010 trial, Itoh was found guilty of two counts of assault leading to bodily injury. The jury on the case could not decide whether he should be charged with a felony third-degree sexual abuse, reports the Iowa Press-Citizen. Itoh submitted a letter of resignation on Jan. 3, two days before a disciplinary hearing was slated to take place. His resignation is effective as of Wednesday formal agreement, which was signed by both parties on Jan.14, notes that a university investigation found that there was probable cause to believe that Itoh had violated UI's policies on violence and sexual harassment. According to the Omaha World-Herald, the agreement stipulates that -- in addition to canceling disciplinary action against Itoh -- the university would not terminate him. For his part, Itoh will not press charges against the institution. Go Ad-Free \u2014 And Protect The Free Press The next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won't back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism. For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us. 3/15/25, 12:14 Toshiki Itoh, University Of Iowa Assistant Professor, Resigns After Assault Conviction | HuffPost College 2/4 Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages. Officials from the university and Itoh's representatives refused to speak with press, citing a confidentiality clause in the agreement. Itoh will be retried on this charge on April 11, and his sentence will be determined at that time Suggest a correction | Submit a tip Donald Trump Claims And Are \u2018Illegal\u2019 In Speech Appeals Court Lifts Block On Trump's Orders Restricting Programs 3/15/25, 12:14 Toshiki Itoh, University Of Iowa Assistant Professor, Resigns After Assault Conviction | HuffPost College 3/4 Rep. Nancy Mace Sued For Defamation After Speech Alleging Sexual Assault This Super Common Dog Owner Habit May Be Shaving Years Off Your Pet's Life Part of HuffPost News. \u00a92025 BuzzFeed, Inc. All rights reserved. The Huffington Post 3/15/25, 12:14 Toshiki Itoh, University Of Iowa Assistant Professor, Resigns After Assault Conviction | HuffPost College 4/4", "7751_103.pdf": "Toshiki Itoh Two Years Paid Leave, No Spotlight for Professor on Trial for Sexual Abuse by Mike Anderson October 18, 2010 Why you can trust Investigate Midwest In another case involving a University of Iowa faculty member and allegations of sexual misconduct, an assistant professor who has been on paid leave for two years is scheduled to go on trial today to face charges that he assaulted and sexually abused his lab assistant. Toshiki Itoh, 47, a faculty member in the Department of Pathology, draws a salary of $93,000 a year and was put on paid leave after he was charged in 2008. The Johnson County District Attorney\u2019s office charged him on Sept. 10, 2008, with 3 degree sexual abuse and two counts of assault causing bodily injury. Itoh\u2019s lawyer, Patricia C. Kamath, declined to comment on the case. But Itoh has entered a not guilty plea. The sexual abuse charge covers a period from Jan. 1, 2007, through July 10, 2008, and the assaults allegedly occurred on July 8 and July 10 in 2008. rd 3/15/25, 12:14 Two Years Paid Leave, No Spotlight for Professor on Trial for Sexual Abuse - Investigate Midwest 1/4 Toshiki Itoh Jury selection is expected to take up most of the morning. The prosecution and defense may begin presenting their opening statements in the afternoon. While several other cases involving either faculty or university football players received widespread coverage by news organizations, Itoh\u2019s case has received virtually no attention. Two of those other cases, one involving political science professor Arthur Miller, 66, and the other music professor Mark Weiger, were unfolding at the same time as Itoh\u2019s. Miller and Weiger committed suicide in 2008 after the allegations became public third case involved former university football players Abe Satterfield and Cedric Everson, who were accused of sexually abusing a female student athlete at Hillcrest dormitory in October 2007. Satterfield has pleaded guilty to an aggravated misdemeanor assault charge, and Everson is scheduled for trial in January. The charges against Itoh grew out of an emergency call by his lab assistant to university police on July 10, 2008, from a lab at the College of Medicine. When a campus police officer arrived, she found the lab assistant bearing bruises and scratches on her arms and face, a police record in court files say. The police report said the assistant alleged that Itoh had punched her in the face with his closed fist on July 10, because she had missed work the previous day. According to the report, she told authorities she had missed work because Itoh had beat her the day before \u2013 July 8\u2013 for misusing a lab microscope. In the report, she alleged Itoh had been sexually assaulting her since Jan. 1, 2007. Itoh\u2019s Pathology Department web page says he studied to get his M.D. and Ph at Kumamoto University School of Medicine in Japan from 1989 to 1996. He did research at the University of California-Berkeley from 1999 to 2005, when he moved to Iowa City. Since then, he\u2019s done research in the pathology department as an assistant professor. His name is still listed in the university directory. After University of Iowa officials placed him on leave, his lab was closed and phone disconnected, and he was barred from entering campus until further notice, according to Media Relations Director Tom Moore. University officials declined to discuss Itoh\u2019s case, except to confirm his leave of absence. Although university policy routinely allows paid leaves for professors for up to two semesters for research and professional activities, Moore said there is no written policy on granting paid leaves for faculty accused of 3/15/25, 12:14 Two Years Paid Leave, No Spotlight for Professor on Trial for Sexual Abuse - Investigate Midwest 2/4 Pingback: Tweets that mention Two years paid leave, no spotlight for professor on trial for sexual abuse | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism -- Topsy.com civil or criminal wrongdoing. But Tom Rice, associate provost for faculty, said giving paid leaves in such cases are justified. \u201cSome people have issues with it,\u201d he said. \u201cBut it is, after all, the right thing to do; you\u2019re innocent until proven guilty.\u201d Two of the other sexual abuse cases embroiled the university in controversy. The charges against the two football players prompted criticism from the Board of Regents over the way the university handled the case and led President Sally Mason to fire two other University employees, both of whom subsequently filed suits to challenge their dismissals. And, the is still fighting a long public records battle with the Iowa City Press- Citizen over its effort to obtain information about the university\u2019s handling of the case. In the case involving Weiger, one of the victims filed a civil suit against the university, alleging that officials did not adequately respond to earlier complaints she had filed against the professor. The university settled her suit in January for $130,000. (Michael Anderson is a senior journalism major at the University of Iowa\u2019s School of Journalism and Mass Communication with a second major in philosophy and a minor in English.) Hey Tocayo, Congrats on your article could use a couple of years paid leave of absence like this guy. If he is found guilty, maybe he should just have to pay all that money back. Abrazotes, Tio Michael October 18, 2010 at 2:27 pm Michael Boarini 3/15/25, 12:14 Two Years Paid Leave, No Spotlight for Professor on Trial for Sexual Abuse - Investigate Midwest 3/4 Pingback Professor assaulted lab assistant many times, victim testifies | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism Pingback: Fearing loss of job lab assistant kept abuse secret, she testifies | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism Pingback Professor denies sexual abuse, assault | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism Pingback: \u2018Irritated\u2019 Judge halts abuse trial as Professor claims self defense | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism Pingback: Attorneys make final arguments in Itoh case, verdict expected Tuesday | The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism \u00a9 2025 Investigate Midwest Powered by Newspack Wow. What an appalling story! And yet so well written!!! \ud83d\ude42 Bravo Mike, looking good. And am really hooked in now. I\u2019m interested to see how this case ends up hope that truth and justice are served. Congrats on your getting published!! Hugs and love, Jen \u2013 and agree with tio\u2026\u2026 can we make him pay back the money if he is found guilty?!?!? October 19, 2010 at 1:44 pm Cuz Jennifer ;) And thought Iowa was a Golly, Jee Wiz place, but seems you have your madness too\u2026\u2026.. Lots of twisted proffesors, huh?\u2026 well, Maxim Gorkey said once said good man can be stupid and still be good, a bad man must have brains\u201d\u2026..Great article Mike October 19, 2010 at 9:12 pm Patrick King 3/15/25, 12:14 Two Years Paid Leave, No Spotlight for Professor on Trial for Sexual Abuse - Investigate Midwest 4/4", "7751_104.pdf": "University settled twice with assaulted researcher Updated: 7:08 May 2, 2014 Infinite Scroll Enabled Watch on Demand \uf10c \uf0e0 \uf12539\u00b0 \uf0c9 Des Moines 50309 39\u00b0 \uf125 Cloudy/Wind \uf114 0% \uf041 \uf124 \uf102 1 / 1 The latest breaking updates, delivered straight to your email inbox Privacy Notice \uf107 Your Email Address 3/15/25, 12:14 University settled twice with assaulted researcher 1/4 CITY, Iowa The University of Iowa promised years of employment and benefits to a post-doctoral student who claimed she was physically and sexually assaulted by her supervising professor. Settlement agreements released Thursday show the woman told university officials in 2008 that she'd been assaulted by assistant pathology professor Toshiki Itoh jury in 2010 found Itoh guilty of assault causing bodily injury, but deadlocked on whether he was guilty of third-degree sexual abuse. He later entered an Alford Plea to that charge. Itoh's case is well-known because he collected $200,000 while on paid leave, which outraged state lawmakers. But the university's settlements with his former assistant hadn't been known. In a 2011 agreement, the university guaranteed her employment and benefits through 2015 subsequent agreement last year paid her $42,000 to resign. Recommended Head of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has been killed 3/15/25, 12:14 University settled twice with assaulted researcher 2/4 Don't click on those road toll texts. Officials issue warnings about the smishing scam 'Freakier Friday' trailer reunites Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan in beloved roles VIDEO: Dolly Parton thanks fans for support at Dollywood 40th anniversary celebration Bobbi Gibb hid in the bushes to run the Boston Marathon in 1966 \uf09a \uf099 \uf16a 3/15/25, 12:14 University settled twice with assaulted researcher 3/4 Contact Us News Team Apps & Social Email Alerts Careers Internships Advertise Digital Advertising Terms & Conditions Broadcast Terms & Conditions Reports Captioning Contacts Public Inspection File Public File Assistance Applications News Policy Statements Hearst Television participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. \u00a92025, Hearst Television Inc. on behalf of KCCI-TV. Privacy Notice Industry Opt Out Terms of Use Site Map Your Privacy Choices: Opt Out of Sale/Targeted Ads 3/15/25, 12:14 University settled twice with assaulted researcher 4/4"} |
8,230 | Jeffrey Meunier | University of Connecticut | [
"8230_101.pdf"
] | {} |
8,950 | Massoud Saghafi | San Diego State University | [
"8950_101.pdf",
"8950_101.pdf"
] | {"8950_101.pdf": "Date of Incident Complainant Status Respondent Name and Title Type of Complaint Summary of Substantiated Allegation(s) Outcome Sanction (if applicable) March 2019 Faculty Massoud Saghafi, Faculty Sexual harassment Inappropriate comments, attempted kissing Sexual harassment claim unsubstantiated at university level; Appeals Unit reversed university finding on appeal, substantiating claim of harassment Retirement, with limited participation, in lieu of discipline"} |
9,064 | Robert Benevides | New York University | [
"9064_101.pdf",
"9064_102.pdf"
] | {"9064_102.pdf": "Washington Square News \u2022 September 6, 2024 \u2022 no-longer-employed/ Tisch prof. accused of sexual misconduct by former students \u2018no longer employed\u2019 The professor, Robert Benevides, had been scheduled to teach two courses this semester after a university investigation found he sexually harassed a former student. Carmo Moniz, Editor-at-Large Content warning: This article contains mentions of sexual misconduct. Tisch professor Robert Benevides \u2014 who has been accused of sexual misconduct by multiple former students \u2014 is \u201cno longer employed by NYU,\u201d university spokesperson John Beckman told WSN. Beckman did not provide further details on Benevides\u2019 departure from NYU, saying \u201cit is not the university\u2019s practice to discuss individual personnel matters.\u201d Benevides\u2019 exit follows a report into his conduct, which revealed that the professor was scheduled to teach at Tisch two semesters after a university investigation determined he sexually harassed a student. Benevides, who served as the Tisch School of the Arts\u2019 area head for special effects makeup, had been scheduled to teach Intro to 3D Character Design Using Zbrush and Special Effects Makeup during the fall 2024 semester. Both courses were removed from Albert, NYU\u2019s course registration platform, this past summer. The former student whose complaint led to the university investigation had said that in one instance at the professor\u2019s office, Benevides told her he would have sex with her. She shared this information with the Office of Equal Opportunity \u2014 the entity that oversees NYU\u2019s response to allegations of sexual misconduct \u2014 which found that Benevides\u2019 actions constituted sexual harassment, according to emails obtained by WSN. Katie Peurrung Tisch professor who was accused of sexual misconduct is \u201cno longer employed\u201d by the university. (Photo by Katie Peurrung) \u201cIt\u2019s reassuring to see accountability taking place,\u201d the student, who asked to remain anonymous due to safety concerns, said of Benevides\u2019 departure. \u201cNo student should ever have to experience harassment in an environment meant to foster growth and learning hope this serves as a step toward creating a safer environment for everyone in the community.\u201d Other former students alleged the professor had touched them inappropriately, shown them pornographic material in class or sent messages regarding their appearance to their personal social media accounts. One of the students said Benevides also made inappropriate remarks to them in-person and at his apartment, including comments about pornography and their appearance. Two of the students also filed formal misconduct complaints against Benevides with the during summer 2023, one of whom was told there was \u201cinsufficient evidence\u201d to show the professor\u2019s behavior violated NYU\u2019s Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy and another who said the never followed up with her. \u201cAlthough we\u2019re grateful that something has finally been done after all of our complaints, it still feels as though did not respond to the situation until it had been publicized, and likely nothing would\u2019ve been done at all had we not chosen to have it reported on in a publication,\u201d said one student who filed a complaint against Benevides, who asked to remain anonymous due to privacy concerns administration needs to get in touch with their moral compass so that something this lengthy and destructive doesn\u2019t happen again.\u201d Benevides did not respond to phone calls or voicemail messages seeking comment. As part of its mission to promote accountability on campus is committed to publishing thorough, mindful reporting on sexual misconduct and other forms of discrimination and harassment at NYU. If you\u2019ve had an experience you\u2019d like to share with our reporters, contact [email protected]. Contact Carmo Moniz at [email protected]."} |
7,701 | Miguel Diaz | University of Dayton | [
"7701_101.pdf",
"7701_102.pdf",
"7701_103.pdf",
"7701_104.pdf",
"7701_105.pdf",
"7701_106.pdf",
"7701_107.pdf",
"7701_108.pdf",
"7701_108.pdf",
"7701_108.pdf"
] | {"7701_108.pdf": "Miguel H. D\u00edaz United States Ambassador to the Holy See In office October 2, 2009 \u2013 November 10, 2012 President Barack Obama Preceded by Mary Ann Glendon Succeeded by Ken Hackett Personal details Born September 29, 1963 Profession Diplomat Miguel H. D\u00edaz Miguel Humberto D\u00edaz (born September 29, 1963)[1] is an American theologian, diplomat and commentator who served as United States Ambassador to the Holy See. He was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed by the U.S. Senate on August 5, 2009.[2] He resigned on November 5, 2012,[3] and was immediately named University Professor of Faith and Culture[4] at the University of Dayton. He was the first Hispanic U.S. Ambassador accredited to the Holy See. As ambassador, D\u00edaz helped launch the Religion in Foreign Policy Working Group of the Secretary of State's Strategic Dialogue with Civil Society. The Working Group facilitates regular dialogue between the U.S. foreign policy establishment and religious leaders, scholars, and practitioners worldwide on strategies to build more effective partnerships on issues such as conflict prevention, humanitarian assistance and national security.[3] On May 20, 2014, Loyola University Chicago announced that they intended to hire D\u00edaz as a professor despite a University of Dayton harassment allegation spokesman for Loyola said in an email, \"We have reviewed the allegations raised against Miguel Diaz and our offer to him stands.\" He became a professor at Loyola on July 1, 2014.[5] D\u00edaz was born in Havana, Cuba, and he and his family departed for Spain when he was nine. Two years later, he immigrated to Florida. He comes from a modest background; his father worked as a waiter and his mother worked as a data entry clerk.[6][7] D\u00edaz holds a B.A. from St. Thomas University and an M.A. and a Ph.D. in Theology from the University of Notre Dame.[8] Early life and education 3/15/25, 12:11 Miguel H. D\u00edaz - Wikipedia 1/4 Prior to his service as ambassador, he was a professor of theology at the College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University in Minnesota. D\u00edaz is the co-editor of the book From the Heart of Our People: Explorations in Catholic Systematic Theology and author of On Being Human: U.S. Hispanic and Rahnerian Perspectives, named \"Best Book of the Year\" by the Hispanic Theological Initiative at Princeton Theological Seminary. D\u00edaz has taught religious studies and theology at Barry University, the University of Dayton and the University of Notre Dame. From 2001 to 2003, he taught and served as academic dean at St. Vincent de Paul Regional Seminary in Boynton Beach, Florida. He is a board member of the Catholic Theological Society of America (CTSA) and past president of the Academy of Catholic Hispanic Theologians of the United States (ACHTUS). Conservative news outlet Newsmax claimed that D\u00edaz was rejected by the Vatican several times. However, Time magazine said that the story was false.[9] He presented his credentials on October 2, 2009, and served until November 10, 2012.[10] Building on the work of Karl Rahner, D\u00edaz has placed extensive emphasis on the role of the Trinity in history.[11] Along with theologians such as Catherine LaCugna, D\u00edaz argues that the life of God cannot be considered apart from history, but must be conceived as \"for us, and for our salvation.\" In this vein, he has also asserted that in the contemporary American context, God can be seen vividly \"in the face of migrants,\" who face the dangers of economic insecurity, violence, and social marginalization in search of a better life.[12] D\u00edaz gave his first speech on U.S. soil as ambassador on Friday, February 5, 2010, at St. John Vianney College Seminary in Miami, Fl.[13] He spoke at the seminary's 11th Annual Fides et Ratio Conference on the relations between the U.S. Government and the Holy See.[14] Ambassador D\u00edaz attended St. John Vianney College Seminary and obtained a certificate in Pre-Theology.[15] He received several honorary doctorates while serving as ambassador. After joining the University of Dayton, he was sought for analysis and comment[16] by the national news media, especially upon the resignation of Pope Benedict in February 2013. He currently holds the John Courtney Murray University Chair in Public Service at Loyola University Chicago where he continues to be sought by multiple media outlets for analysis and commentary.[17] Career Theology Speeches References 3/15/25, 12:11 Miguel H. D\u00edaz - Wikipedia 2/4 1. College of Saint Benedict/Saint John\u2019s University ( aff/diaz-vita.pdf) 2. Wan, William. \"Drei neue Botschafter am Heiligen Stuhl\" ( h/godingovernment/2009/08/obamas_nominee_confirmed_as_vatican_ambassador.html/). The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-08-13. 3. \"Ambassador Miguel D\u00ecaz Departs Post\" ( can.usembassy.gov/news-events/diaz-departs-post.html Embassy to the Holy See State Department. Archived from the original ( post.html) on 2013-01-27. Retrieved 24 November 2012. 4. \"Our Man From Rome\" ( ws/articles/2012/11/miguel_diaz_appointment.php). University of Dayton. Archived from the original ( on 2013- 05-30. Retrieved 23 February 2013. 5. \"Loyola Chicago will hire ex-vatican ambassador despite harassment allegations\" ( ehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/05/20/loyola-chicago-will-hire-ex-vatican-ambassador-despite-har assment-allegations#ixzz32ZXQuu9W). Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 20 May 2014. 6. Obama\u2019s pick for Vatican ambassador described as devout scholar, leading theologian ( s.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?&articleid=1175580&format=&page=1&listingType= politics), Boston Herald, May 29, 2009 Archived ( 9/ stingType=politics) March 19, 2012, at the Wayback Machine 7. Eric Gorski Hispanic theologian chosen for Vatican ambassador ( ews/ap/article/ALeqM5ixIUCIu6J6moGgKY8PaC6cUvkHbQD98EUBO00) AP, May 27, 2009 8. \"President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts\" ( s.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Announces-More-Key-Administration-Posts-5-27-2009/). whitehouse.gov. 27 May 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-05 \u2013 via National Archives. 9. Sullivan, Amy. Obama's Vatican Ambassador Rejected? No ( 09/obamas-vatican-ambassador-rejected-no/), The Swampland, Time Magazine, April 9, 2009, accessed April 4, 2010. 10. \"Miguel Humberto Diaz (1963\u2013)\" ( umberto). Department of State. 11. Esp\u00edn, Orlando (2009). Building Bridges, Doing Justice: Constructing a Latino/a Ecumenical Theology. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. pp. 91\u2013111. 12. D\u00edaz, Miguel (January 1, 2009). \"On Loving Strangers: Encountering the Mystery of God in the Face of Migrants\". Word and World. 29 (3): 234\u2013242. 13. Thomas Pringle\"Fides et Ratio\" ( Catholica Omnia. Retrieved 2010-03-11. 14. Thomas Pringle\"Fides et Ratio\" ( Catholica Omnia. Retrieved 2010-03-11. 15. \"Alumnus-Turned-Ambassador Returns To St. John Vianney\" ( 13095125/ y). The Florida Catholic. Archived from the original ( ambassador_returns_to_st_john_vianney) on 2010-06-13. Retrieved 2010-03-12. 16. \"Pope Resigns\" ( University of Dayton. Retrieved 23 February 2013. 17. \"Faculty & Staff Directory: The John Courtney Murray, S.J., University Chair in Public Service and: Theology, Department of: Loyola University Chicago\" ( zmiguelh.shtml). This article incorporates public domain material from U.S. Bilateral Relations Fact Sheets (https:// United States Department of State. 3/15/25, 12:11 Miguel H. D\u00edaz - Wikipedia 3/4 Report: Miguel Diaz prof, accused of harassment ( s/local/report-miguel-diaz-ud-faculty-accused-harassment/nfpzD/) The Dayton Daily News, May 5, 2014 Former ambassador Vatican moves new university after sexual harassment investigation ( ww.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/Diaz-documents-redacted-for-web.pdf) Inside Higher May 5, 2014 Loyola U. hires ex-Vatican ambassador with questionable past ( 276303-418/loyola-u-hires-ex-vatican-ambassador-with-questionable-past.html#.U3DwACj5Kt8) The Chicago SunTimes May 6, 2014 Former professor accused of sexual harassment at Dayton ( ws/local/2014/05/06/former-sju-professor-accused-sexual-harassment-dayton/8771835/) The Saint Cloud Times May 6, 2014 Obama ex-Vatican envoy hit by sex harassment complaint ( s/in-the-loop/wp/2014/05/06/obama-ex-vatican-envoy-hit-by-sex-harassment-complaint/) Washington Post May 6, 2014 University of Dayton ( University of Dayton faculty page for Miguel Diaz ( ttp:// College of St. Benedict and St. John\u2019s University faculty page for Miguel Diaz ( org/web/20090709231855/ Karl Rahner Society ( with Biography and Bibliography The Academy of Catholic Hispanic Theologians of the United States (ACHTUS) ( s.org) with press release Retrieved from \" External links 3/15/25, 12:11 Miguel H. D\u00edaz - Wikipedia 4/4"} |
Subsets and Splits