The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
This dataset extends the Knesset Corpus by annotating it for Check Worthiness. The possible values per sentence are: worth checking, not worth checking , or not a factual proposition
The annotations were generated by knesset-dicta-checkworthiness.
- Citation:
@InProceedings{goldin-EtAl:2025:RANLP, author = {Goldin, Gili and Wigderson, Shira and Rabinovich, Ella and Wintner, Shuly}, title = {An Annotation Scheme for Factuality and Its Application to Parliamentary Proceedings}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Natural Language Processing in the Generative AI era}, month = {September}, year = {2025}, address = {Varna, Bulgaria}, publisher = {INCOMA Ltd., Shoumen, Bulgaria}, pages = {403--412}, abstract = {Factuality assesses the extent to which a language utterance relates to real-world information; it determines whether utterances correspond to facts, possibilities, or imaginary situations, and as such, it is instrumental for fact checking. Factuality is a complex notion that relies on multiple linguistic signals, and has been studied in various disciplines. We present a complex, multi-faceted annotation scheme of factuality that combines concepts from a variety of previous works. We developed the scheme for Hebrew, but we trust that it can be adapted to other languages. We also present a set of almost 5,000 sentences in the domain of parliamentary discourse that we manually annotated according to this scheme. We report on inter-annotator agreement, and experiment with various approaches to automatically predict (some features of) the scheme, in order to extend the annotation to a large corpus.}, url = {https://aclanthology.org/2025.ranlp-1.49} }
- Downloads last month
- 11