input
stringlengths 2.56k
4.21k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
---|---|---|
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings!\n\nI was just wondering what your aims were regarding territory in the area? May I suggest that we keep Tyr as a DMZ for the time being?', 'Hi there, Italy! In my experience, Austria and Italy fighting anytime before 1904 or so ends one way: they are both eliminated. So keeping a DMZ is good (ideally find a way to keep all four of TRL, ADR, TRI and VEN as a DMZ) but even better would be a joint goal we can work together on. Typically as Austria my thoughts are to keep Russia and Turkey from allying, and pick one side against the other. If you wanted to go after Turkey with me, that could work, but if you wanted to go after France (with either English or German help), I could go after Russia with Turkish help. In general, I guess I’m saying I’m willing to go almost any sensible way that goes along with an alliance which I can grow to trust 🙂', "I was definitely thinking of going after France, as I find they can quickly spiral out of control if uncontested.\n\nMight be best if you go after Turkey with Russia and I'll focus my attention West", 'Awesome. I reached out to Russia and will let you know how that turns out. You have any indications that you’ll get any help against France? It can be a slow and annoying slog if you go 1:1 against them...', 'England seems to be interested, so hopefully we can nip France in the bud ASAP']
Output:
| [
"So how did we want to move in Spring to set us both up to feel safe and not tightly entangled in each other’s business? Any particular moves you have in mind, given what you’ve been hearing?"
] | task1590-c283c77bbbe544579b1581f3dcf9ced3 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Shall we juggernaut this bastard?', "you'll have to define 'juggernaut' and 'this bastard'", 'Basically just "Hey, you wanna work together?"', "I'll certainly consider it. Do you have any specific requests in mind regarding the Balkans and Black Sea?", "I'd rather we didn't bounce in the black sea - If you move your fleet to Constantinople then you can get it out into the Mediterranean really quickly, to both of our benefits."]
Output:
| [
"I'm not sure I know you well enough yet to just hand you the black sea, though. What's in it for me?"
] | task1590-2a770fa300f145fea8f33bf6efac9bd0 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings, Germany!\n\nThe risk of an early conflict between France and Germany is pretty high, so suggest that we clear the air early on.\n\nThe biggest question here is Burgundy, which borders one of your home supply centers and two of mine. It is important to me that Burgundy remains unoccupied - my suggestion is that we set up a bounce between A Munich - Burgundy, A Paris - Burgundy. This has the secondary benefit of allowing us to put on some theater about how the other broke their word to win sympathy points. I also believe that Germany often wants A Munich to stay put anyways, to guard against an attack through Tyrolia.\n\nLet me also know your thoughts regarding Belgium. I am not super attached to claiming it, so would be open to bargain my support on the Belgian question for a future alliance.\n\nBest of luck to you!', 'Hi France! Thanks for taking the initiative and for your thoughtful message. Let’s do the bounce in Burgundy! I’m really looking forward to getting to know you and everyone in this game!', 'Appreciated. What are your thoughts on F Kiel to Denmark vs Netherlands? Assuming Berlin to Kiel is a typical no brainer', 'I’m going to Hol, if that’s alright with you? I’m very interested in your idea of giving me free pass into Belgium for an alliance against England.', "I would have preferred a move to Denmark, but Holland isn't a problem for me either - it's up to you."]
Output:
| [
"Are you aiming to claim Belgium in year 1? As it is, there's no way for you to get three builds so curious which two you will prioritize."
] | task1590-de0458c24e6f42cdaa052974bf1a8f6f |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hello there! I realize that we don’t have a ton to talk about but I’m curious what you think about the game in general, and specifically France.', "I'm not sure yet, let me work out the East.", 'Yeah just want to know what my neighbors are thinking, keep me posted and let me know if you need my opinion on anything', 'Not always giving me the option to guess true or false even though it asks me. <@567829259054219275>', 'I’ve been getting it']
Output:
| [
"Any chance you move against France?"
] | task1590-d9a79129567348739fbb4054dc99efb7 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Greetings and salutations! I prefer not to bounce in Galicia - it weakens Austria against Italy since you can't cover Trieste and it means I HAVE to move Moscow to Ukraine, which commits that unit to a southern direction early. What are you thoughts?", 'I’m not a fan of fighting Italy or Russia as Austria. Germany will also probably guarantee Tyr. I just want to survive, and you two are capable of picking me apart. Is there some sort of arrangement we can come to with turkey and the Balkans that doesn’t involve me wasting away in the carpathians?', "How much of Turkey are you willing to let the Italian have? I'd like two centers and I'd be comfortable with you having Bulgaria - as long as you were willing to head after Italy next.", 'Two centers is a lot to give if I’m doing the heavy lifting and then fighting Italy on top of it unless you’re going through Arm? I assumed you’d be going north?', "I mean, I'm assuming you've got Italy doing a Lepanto and getting out of position. When you said an arrangement with Turkey - did you mean the three of us working together or you and I splitting him up. 'Cause if we split him up, then a 50/50 split seems pretty fair, right? I'd get two, and you'd get Bulgaria and another."]
Output:
| [
"I meant carving him up. If you take the Armenian opening, I’m fine with a 2 & 1 + 1."
] | task1590-faa471e1b6074abeb5982a06e7447e58 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['How’s it going Austria? Looking forward to a fun and exciting game!', 'Hello Germany. How do you feel about being friendly? If so lets leave BOH and TYR as neutral zones. What do you think?', 'Yeah let’s do it!', 'sounds great. Hopefully when that plays out we can work together more in the future', 'Yeah for sure!']
Output:
| [
"Hey Austria! How’s it going?"
] | task1590-72b0db00eca2469da5def05088f11634 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hi France! I don't think we have a ton to talk about yet, but if you're planning to go in against Italy that's certainly something I'd like to know.", 'Thanks for reaching out. How do you generally feel about working with Italy?', 'If Italy wants it, it can be a powerful alliance, but in my experience Italy rarely wants it badly enough.', "That's true, and my experience as well. It's tricky since if he's not going after me or yoy, then what are his plans? If Italy isn't planning to Lepanto then it is worrying for one of us", "Well I haven't heard *too* much from Italy yet, but once I find out more about his current intentions I will certainly let you know."]
Output:
| [
"Nice, things are looking up for you with the Russia/Turkey conflict and a seemingly friendly Italy."
] | task1590-5bcc6707a0bd4da0b2936614c969a551 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Good morning! Best of luck to you, and let me know how we can best avoid any unnecessary and unproductive entanglements. 😃', "Best of luck to you as well! I'm likely opening north and I have my eye on Norway for the fall. However, this may be dependent on some discussion with France. Can I ask where you're planning to send your Moscow army this Spring?", "My initial inclination is to focus on the South. I do have to weigh that over concerns of you opening full north, but hopefully we can stay on the same page. I am of course much happier if you indicate you're going to put a fleet in Nwy.", "That's fair enough. I'm talking to France now about Belgium, as my army is pretty useless just hanging around the island. I can't commit to leaving my army off of Nwy just yet. Let me get back to you when I hear from France about Belgium.", 'Sounds great. Good luck in your French negotiations!']
Output:
| [
"Belgium definitely on the table but still not confirmed. Germany is acting like a big hot-head btw. Threatening war from the outset. If they don't calm down, maybe we can talk about helping you into Denmark next year."
] | task1590-fef8663b60df40e69be9ca604afa764a |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hi there Germany! We can both agree that one of us dying early doesn’t bode well for the other, right? Want to establish a “intelligence sharing pact” to help make sure some early stability for each other means we can both survive into the mid-game where perhaps we can actually coordinate?', 'Yes I’d like that. Currently England has suggested they would like to be my ally and Italy wants Tyr to remain empty.', 'So if Italy is asking *both* of us to leave TRL empty, you know what that probably means? :/', 'What information do you have?', 'No proof, just that Italy asked for a DMZ in TRL, but England says they haven’t discussed going after France together, which makes me think Italy is trying to keep TRL open so they can walk in there themselves. Not sure though. Also heard Russia is probably moving south as usual (but to be used with me against Turkey, or against me with Turkey? Only time will tell!)']
Output:
| [
"Any word from France?"
] | task1590-c5d92ada319644a68895d5c33be145b3 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hey Russia, would you be open to not moving an army north? I’m not interested in taking StP', 'Austria is pushing Italy to not do a lepanto but to go west. That might mean that Turkey is going north with Austria.', 'Thanks for the info! I trust that you don’t want to take StP, an army north could help me put you into Norway though', 'I’ll be ok in Norway without your army in StP. I view A Mos - StP in spring 1901 as a strong anti-England move and building F StP(nc) as equally anti-England', 'Are we still good up north? I’m not interested in fighting you right now, and would prefer to just use a fleet to capture Nrwy.\n\nCan you promise to not send Mos northward this turn?']
Output:
| [
"Of course, I wasn't trying to be sneaky with my suggestion. I understand your concern and will not move StP North."
] | task1590-21a202475cf8424ea4c3b44ab3c7da4e |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings Sultan!\n\nAs your neighbor I would like to propose an alliance! What are your views on the board so far?', 'I think an alliance would be great! Perhaps a dmz in the Black Sea would be a good idea to solidify this alliance?\n\nAs for my views on the board, my first moves will be Western into the Balkans and Mediterranean Sea.', 'Sounds good lets call a dmz in the black sea', "What's our move this year?", "I've been away from the game for a while"]
Output:
| [
"Not sure yet, what are your thoughts?"
] | task1590-6acd73e902f04472a3e3a3b2eb9f4cd9 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hello there! What's your general plan for this game? My inclination when I play Austria is to piss off as few people as possible, so I don't plan on making any overtly aggressive moves this turn.", 'I suggest containment of Russia at the very least and perhaps his destruction', 'That certainly sounds just fine to me. I think Turkey and Austria can make for a very good alliance - you build a bunch of fleets, I build a bunch of armies, and we crush a bunch of dots.', 'Ok lets roll I’ll go north for the opening', 'If you want to contain Russia I am willing to support you into rum if you want to wait that’s ok too']
Output:
| [
"I'd love the support, thanks."
] | task1590-e14930c0c7a441bfabdb32ead7ccf4c5 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hey Germany! Got any thoughts about Sweden?', "I do, but I'm curious as to what you'd suggest.", "Well, I mean, obviously I'd like to get it for myself, because Russia is fairly fragile overall. I like Russia/Germany as an alliance, because we can project lots of force in directions that aren't right after each other.", "I'm in", 'Just stay out of pru and sil unless you give me some heads up']
Output:
| [
"You got it."
] | task1590-e564214c0a374dedb7696d371d1763a1 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings My Good Frenchman! \n\nHow are your opening moves looking? I would love a solid Russo-French relationship so I’ll start off with some intel for you: Italy is headed west for you', 'Hi there,\n\nHow is that going to work? Austria vs turkey without Italy?', "Ha I honestly don't know, just trying to tip you off", "How'd the first turn go for you? I was hoping to make gains in Gal and BLA but was bounced out. Do you think E/G are working against you?", 'I have expected a bounce in Pie because you and another power told me so']
Output:
| [
"Looks like a conspiracy here against me"
] | task1590-59a75cd5c31242e9893e5d6aeb7be42d |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings, neighbor! Was wondering if you would like to come to some agreement about how to preliminarily divide up the Balkans?', 'Hello there! I think that would be great, how were you thinking of splitting them up?', 'Hmm can I take Bul & Rum while you take Ser & Gre?', "I'd prefer Ser and Rum out of those four", "I know that would be your preference, but Russia has offered to support me into Rum anyway, so I figured there'd be less hard feelings if we could just agree to this split and both potentially get two builds? Or, if Russia has made conflicting promises to you, then I hope you'd let me know, and then a) I'd appreciate the intel, and b) we could split things your way?"]
Output:
| [
"Got some bad news for you then, Russia also told me the same stuff. Think he might playing both sides to see what he can get."
] | task1590-2a27a155562d46c0a19623c2616b7dab |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hi Italy! Got any juicy gossip?', 'Nothing yet, you?', 'Nothing as of yet. How do you feel about an AIR? If the three of us all run in hard on Turkey, our game will be SO MUCH simpler.', "That's you, me and Austria?", 'Yup. We go in hard, dig out Turkey, then you go after France, Austria goes after Germany, and I go after Scandinavia and England. Or you and I turn on Austria and crush him between us. Either way, you and I make perfect natural allies.']
Output:
| [
"Sounds like a plan!"
] | task1590-dd0646fdb4fe45c18a3143b3aad16312 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hi Sultan, think we could establish a media alliance in which we share vital intel for each other in hopes of ensuring our corners?', "I think that sounds doable. If I hear anything that might be relevant to you I'll let you know.", "Very good. That being established, I'm curious if russia has made allegiance with you", "We're talking but I would not describe it as an allegiance.", 'Aight tks man']
Output:
| [
"Any questions for me?"
] | task1590-c1dc17c0743e4fe89ebd2ba9c7cb05c8 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["I would prefer to bounce in the Black sea, unless you're interested in doing something like blowing up my fleet.", "I am interested in both, but for sake of any alliance I'd go for a bounce.", "I agree, that's probably for the best. let's see what our neighbors do in '01, perhaps it will open up some opportunities.", "Yes of course. The smartest move is that. But I would like to work with you the most because AT alliance won't work past 1903 and IT is just a wild card for me. I am not saying we should do Juggernaut but maybe Juggernaut Lite, sort of.", 'Jug light it is!']
Output:
| [
"Good morning! I’d prefer not to bounce again, but want to know what you’re thinking."
] | task1590-5e4d76d35d244d3189fcd915c339738a |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hello Italy what’s up what are your thoughts on austria and France?', 'Hi Turkey! I’m sorry that I’ve been so slow to get in touch. Kind of a rough day for me to begin a game as I e been pretty swamped. Things are clearing up now, and I appreciate you reaching out to me. \n\nSo far I have notes from Austria and Russia being pretty cagey and non-committal. Perhaps that is just the life of Italy? Nobody really has me in their plans?\n\nI don’t really know what I’m going to do yet, so if you have ideas, or you have a use for me, please let me know. I’d basically be delighted to work with anyone who really wants to work with me. (No sign yet that this includes anyone at all)', 'Hey Turkey — any interest in working together? I’m trying to think of ideas, but I’d just like to know first if you have interest, and then we can work out a plan if you do.', 'Any thoughts, Turkey?', 'Sure we can work together austria would be the most likely candidate for us to maul']
Output:
| [
"Well, here is a thought: any chance you would support my army to Greece?\n\nIf you’d like to work together against Austria, I think a great move would be to ask Austria to support you to Rum, and then support my army to Greece instead. \n\nIf you are game to do that, I’d be happy to take down Austria with you and work with you moving forward. \n\nThoughts?"
] | task1590-47decd8dd0ca4c08a9875bd02f4fe88c |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hi Germany--it seems our paths are finally crossing! \nI'm guessing England has made plans with you for the two of you to take over russia. Especially if you help England into Moscow, I can't help but notice that England's territory is starting to...surround yours. That doesn't make for a good partnership. I, on the other hand, would pose little threat to you in Moscow and could help keep England at bay in the North/Baltic. \nI'm open to negotiation if you are!", 'Hey Turkey, nice to finally meet you! I’m definitely open to negotiation. The problem at the moment is that it seems like Russia is going to support England into Moscow. So even if I support you, you’d bounce and I can’t afford to have England after me just for that', 'I’m not sure what your relationship with Austria has been so far. He’s been cooperative with me. However, he seemed so single minded about getting rid of Russia...I can’t tell what he wants to do next', "Austria and I have been working together solely on taking down Russia, so I'm not sure of their long term plans either...and I haven't heard from A since winter.\n\nI understand about not supporting me into Moscow, and I appreciate the tip about Russia. Could I perhaps just get an agreement from you not to block me moving to Ukraine?", 'Ok, that’s what it seemed like. I can agree to that!']
Output:
| [
"Are you still interested in Moscow?"
] | task1590-c0934561e3ff4caa8a3c995e586f70bc |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hey Turkey! \n\nHow's it looking over there in the east? Anyways, I was wondering in if you have any intel on Italy, since I haven't heard much from them. I realize we most likely won't have too much to do with each other in the beginning, but I'm looking forwards to working with you later in the game if were both still around! \n\n-France", 'Oh my bad Austria 😳', 'Well, same could go for you ig', "I'm the same, have heard nothing from Italy.", "Hey austria; I don't know if you have noticed but russia is huge rn and is about to crush both you and turkey, and then procede to run over the rest of the map. Idk how your relationship with turkey or italy is, but you guys really need to work together to stop russia."]
Output:
| [
"I haven't noticed! lol. I have noticed. Italy is working with Russia and is unresponsive. Turkey and perhaps even Germany are going to help but I think this ship has sailed 🙂"
] | task1590-b3b3c97b53914800b050b0e2f3ede52e |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Care for a western triple with germany? Ive long wanted to try this', "I love triples, myself. Especially when I'm not Germany", 'Hi president, apologies for the late reply, i worked ALL NIGHT LONG till 5 a.m. and yielded myseld only 2 hrs of sleep then it was back to work 😱 just barely now taking a lunch break', "Glad to hear you'd like the triple. \nGuess this means you launch off the Iberian peninsula towards italy and let me have bel?", 'That could work - just coordinate with the German.']
Output:
| [
"Ok thank you Mr. President. \nMuch obliged"
] | task1590-9bd3061e22e9409a9b360dd869ddcf98 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hi ho Mr. Pope!', 'Hi there your Majesty! How are things on the soggy jewel of the north? Here in the south we are cradled by the warm winds and waters of our homeland - much more conducive to religious reflection and relaxation, if not to any particular martial might.\n\nNot these days anyway. \n\nWhat do you have lined up today?', 'Oh lawd, just give yourself away why dontcha lol', 'As for me you know just trying to eradicate Catholicism from the world', 'Let us stay close in communications to be better prepared for the madness to come yes']
Output:
| [
"So you’re going to message the Pope pledging to eradicate Catholicism from the world? Classy stuff! \n\nBut yes, close communications can only help us in coping and reacting to the adventures of the French. And Germans I suppose, but he hasn’t been unreasonable."
] | task1590-814ac3ebe9e342d58183e1b46a92d9e7 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hello, Austria. \nLook, I'd love to be besties and all that, and maybe we'll get there. But for now can I assume that we both have bigger fish to fry, and that we both know that attacking each other early will mean mutually assured destruction?\n\nI'm open to a non-aggression pact, possibly with sharing information, natirally. Outside of that, let me know what's on your mind and we'll go from there.\n\nBest,\n\n- Kaiser", "No thoughts on the start of the game? Any information I can share, or vice-versa?\n\nYou're pretty quiet down there...", "I actually thought I'd responded sorry. I don't know why we can't be best friends. Germany does well then Austria can do well and vice versa. Not much from.my neighbours. You got anything from Italy?", "Nothing from you or Italy until now. You'll be shocked to learn that Turkey mused about how much he loves to play Germany and open to Tyrolia. 😂\n\nCan't blame a guy for trying, I guess!\n\nAnyway, for now I'm good with a short pact to stay out of Tyrolia (unless you've planned a bounce with Italy or something, but that would be weird ). Maybe limit it to 1901 for now? I don't have any plans in that neighborhood, but I don't want to bind your hands if something comes up with Russia or Italy.", "Tyr 1901 for me would be pretty crazy and no I don't plan for it so I'm happy to agree to it. I've got nothing from Italy either so I'll just have to play defensively there. Russia seems to be interested in opening north"]
Output:
| [
"I wish I could say \"what can I do to help you,\" but I have nothing in range.\n\nWhat I am doing is sowing some seeds of doubt with Italy - floating the idea that Russia and Turkey are working together, and backhandedly noting how bad it will be for him if they are, and they wipe you out quickly.\n\nYou have a best probabilistic set of moves, but the best you can realistically hope for is maybe 1 build if you go +Greece, +Serbia, -Trieste. Maybe.\n\nIf I were you, I'd reach out to Italy. Suggest that he take Tunis, and instead of forcing him out of Trieste, you'll take Greece and move on. Tell him you're going to move to Trieste because it's your best move. It is. Request that he move to Vienna, because that's Russia's best move (it is) and you want to prevent him from getting another build.\n\nYou'd move Bud-Tri, and Ser S Alb-Gre."
] | task1590-1e593837bb514d27b9220fed986ebfc4 |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hello down there, Sultan!\n\nAnything we need to talk about early, or should we just see what happens early?\n\nBest,\n\n- Kaiser', 'Eh, I have the luxury of a boring country that CAN chill out and see how things shake out. \nAnd as much as I personally enjoy opening to Tyrolia as Germany, other people tend to look at me weird if I suggest it, so...I guess all I can really five into is to ask that you give me a heads up if you decide to pick a fight with a mutual neighbor so I can pile on', "So, you were going for the Slingshot Juggernaut, and had the rug pulled out, huh? That hurts. And Austria is in no position to provide much help.\n\nWhat's the plan from this point?", "My hands are tied with my positioning and an NAP that runs through the end of this year, but I'm happy to work as an intermediary with you and Austria to help coordinate.\n\nI've given you one bit of help - Russia can't build in Warsaw, so it takes one unit out of the South.", "Ugh, what a pain in the ass. I can't even rotate on him in a meaningful time frame, and Austria's going to be no help any time soon beyond protecting Bulgaria this turn."]
Output:
| [
"You could take him down together, unless he's working with Italy. Even if he's not, Italy's going to feed on Austria - he's pretty committed - and come after you since you're exposed. The upside is just that they wouldn't likely be explicitly helping each other.\n\nI don't have anything preventing me from going at Italy, and he's really wrecking everything right now. Plus, silent. As far as I know, towards everyone."
] | task1590-23e4c4eed1684568ac72003920211d6c |
Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?
Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns? Seems to me we both have other things to work about. Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool. So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I
Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?
Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude. I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages. What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit. I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?
Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hallo there my dearest Sultan! A pleasure to meet you 😄', 'Hello monsieur President. Greater pleasure would be to work together.', 'I would love for that too. How do things in the east seem to be developing?', "They're going slowly but steady, soon steamy. And what about the western part?", 'The battle for Belgium will be interesting for sure 😅']
Output:
| [
"Just a head up here, Austria wants food relations with me currently but wants me to have Rum. I will go for it but I expect you will take it with support which is OK with me."
] | task1590-e06a09580529420ca3e327468359ffcf |