Rexhaif/Qwen3-0.6B-MTEval-SFT
Text Generation
•
Updated
•
8
Dataset Viewer
messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 特にジャグジーで油断をしていると、 メタボ腹が丸見え状態に。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIf you're in a hot tub, you can see your stomach.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIf you are careless, especially in the Jacuzzi, you will be able to see your metabolic syndrome in full view.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Immer montags treffen sich nämlich dort in der \"Mandolin Motion Show Academy\" um Punkt 15 Uhr drei Damen zum flotten Stepptanz - zusammen sind sie unglaubliche 277 Jahre alt, pardon jung!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nEvery Monday at 3:00 p.m. there, at the Mandolin Motion Show Academy, three ladies meet for a rapturous tap dance - together they're an incredible 277 years old, pardoned young!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThat is where three women meet for vigorous tap dancing at 3 pm on the dot at the \"Mandolin Motion Show Academy\" - unbelievably, their combined age is 277 years old, or should I say young!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Generally, he expressed his conviction that our Founding Fathers did not set forth a plan of governance that included federal agencies making laws in place of the legislature.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n一般来说,他表示他的信念,我们的开国元勋没有提出一个治理计划,其中包括联邦机构制定法律,以代替立法机构。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n总的来说，他表示他相信，我们的开国元勋没有制定一个治理计划，其中包括联邦机构制定法律来代替立法机构。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 卒業式でのマスク着用を巡る報道を受け、教員の間でもこの話題が持ち上がっているという。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAccording to reports about wearing masks at graduation ceremonies, this topic is also raised among teachers.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAdvertisement - Scroll to Continue Teachers have also raised the issue in the wake of reports of masks being worn at graduation ceremonies.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Namely the lack of enough bins, and the lack of signs to explain the significance of the lighting colours.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n缺乏足够的垃圾,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n即垃圾箱不足，以及缺乏解释灯光颜色意义的标志。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 本馬場では神職と代表者がコーナーなどを回り、切麻（きりぬさ）をまいて清めた。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAt Honbaba, Shinto priests and representatives went around the corner and sprinkled Kirinusa to purify the area.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAt Honbaba, priests and representatives went around the corner and cleaned up the area with kirinaza.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Echidna with amethyst and magenta spikes.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n玉と青色の刺がったエキドナ\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nアメジストとマゼンタのスパイクが付いたエキドナ。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 福井県の福井市足羽山公園遊園地の屋内施設「ハピジャン」のカピバラの写真を毎週撮影し、インスタグラムで発信している市内の男性がいる。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nA man in the city of Fukui prefecture is taking photos of the capybara every week at the \"Hapijan\" indoor facility at the Fuji City Fuji-Fan-Yamamoto Park and Recreation Park in Fukui Prefecture and posting them on Instagram.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThere is a man in the city who takes photos of a capybara every week at the \"Hapijan\" indoor facility at the Fukuyama Park in Fukuoka Prefecture, and shares them on Instagram.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 保存の仕方にもよります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt depends on how you save it.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt also depends on how you save it.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I would also appeal to anyone who was driving in the area and who may have dash-cam footage which could assist our investigation to contact us.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nまた、この地域で運転していて、ダッシュカムの映像を持っている可能性のある人には、私たちの調査が私たちに連絡するのを助けることができる人に訴えます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我也会呼吁任何在该地区开车的人，以及可能拥有可以帮助我们调查的dash-cam视频的人联系我们。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON11) But for some folders, for some reason, the audio format is wrong, so, something is wrongly –\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON11) しかし、いくつかのフォルダのために, 何らかの理由で, オーディオフォーマットが間違っています, そう, 何かが間違っています –\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n（PERSON11）しかし、いくつかのフォルダのために、何らかの理由で、オーディオ形式が間違っているので、何かが間違っています –\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Sorry, I never thought about it in depth.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nすみません、深く考えたことはありませんでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nすみません、深く考えたことはありませんでした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: プロユーザーにも安心してご使用いただける品質の、弱粘着タイプ養生テープです。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThis is a low adhesive type curing tape of a quality that even professional users can use with peace of mind.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt is a weak adhesive type curing tape of the quality that professional users can use with confidence.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Humanity is out in 5 days.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n人類は5日で出ています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n人类将在5天后消失。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Excellent read!!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n優れた読み取り!!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n素晴らしい読み物です!!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Hinweise nimmt die Kriminalpolizei der Polizeidirektion 1 (Nord) unter der Rufnummer (030) 4664 - 171 100 oder jede andere Polizeidienststelle entgegen.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe information may be obtained from the Criminal Police of the Police Directorate 1 (North) by calling (030) 4664 - 171 100 or any other police department.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nInformation can be obtained from the Criminal Investigation Department of Police Directorate 1 ( North) by calling ( 030) 4664 171 100 or any other police station.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Dabei hatten die äußeren Umstände augenscheinlich gar nicht für Herrmann-Wick gesprochen. Sie hätte schlecht geschlafen, erzählte sie nach dem Rennen, sei \"total aufgeregt\" gewesen, der Puls schon beim Einlaufen nicht mehr heruntergekommen. \"So ein Rennen\", und das bei der Heim-WM, \"das kann man mit Worten nicht beschreiben\", sagte sie. 11.000 Zuschauer johlten zur dröhnenden Schlagermusik mit Deutschlandfahnen, Betreuer und Team fielen sich in die Arme.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe external circumstances apparently did not speak for Herrmann-Wick at all. She had slept badly, she said after the race, was \"totally excited\" and her pulse hadn't slowed down as soon as she walked in. \"Such a race\", and that at the home World Cup, \"you can't describe it in words,\" she said. 11,000 spectators cheered to the booming pop music with German flags, supervisors and team fell into each other's arms.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe external circumstances apparently did not speak in favor of Herrmann-Wick. She had slept poorly, she said after the race, was \"totally excited\", and her pulse did not come down even during the warm-up. \"Such a race\", and that at the home World Championships, \"cannot be described in words,\" she said. 11,000 spectators cheered to the booming pop music with German flags, coaches and team embraced each other.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Kurze Notiz über die Presse - der Freitag\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nShort note about the press - Friday\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nShort note on the press - Friday\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Muž středního věku z Vyškovska takto přišel o skoro sedm set tisíc korun.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЧоловік середнього віку з Вишковського краю втратив майже сімсот тисяч крон.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nТаким чином чоловік середнього віку з Вишковська втратив майже сімсот тисяч крон.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 酷い商品です。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt's a cool product.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nIt's a terrible product.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 【武蔵小金井】メンズ美容院 - ホットペッパービューティー公式\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n[Musashi Koganei] Men's Hair Salon - Hot Pepper Beauty Official\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n【Musashi-Koganei】Men's Beauty Salon - Hot Pepper Beauty Official\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: In China you can only lease land.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n中国では土地を借りることができます.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在中国，你只能租赁土地。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Přebírám za ni zodpovědnost.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nЯ беру на себе відповідальність за це.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nЯ беру на себе відповідальність за неї.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: ＪＲ山形駅（山形市）で１１日、約６年半ぶりに復活したシルバーカラーの山形新幹線「つばさ」の運行が始まった。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe new Silver-colored Shinkansen \"Tabaza\" began its operation at JR Yamaguchi Station (Yamamaguchi City) on 11th, about six and a half years after its revival.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nOn the 11th, a silver-colored Yamagata Shinkansen Tsubasa was launched at JR Yamagata Station (Yamagata City) for the first time in about six and a half years.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Everything I needed\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n♪ 必要なものは\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我需要的一切\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: This is my personal Mandela effect thing.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n这就是我个人的曼德拉效应.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThisismypersonal个人Mandela曼德拉effect影响thing.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Had a recent graduate artist take some critique badly tonight.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n最近卒業したアーティストが 今夜 批評を悪く受け止めてました\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n今夜、最近卒業したアーティストに酷評された。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) sat down with Breitbart News on Thursday and discussed his plans to block the ATF pistol brace rule and his conviction that the Biden Department of Justice \"doesn't want an armed citizenry\" in the first place.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nアンドリュー・クライド下院議員（ジョージア州共和党）は、木曜日にブライトバート・ニュースと対談し、アルコール・タバコ・火器及び爆発物取締局のピストル・ブレース規制を阻止する計画について、また、バイデン政権下の司法省は最初から武装市民を望んではいないと確信していると論じた。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nJavascriptの設定を変更する方法はこちらバイデン米司法省が「武装した市民を望んでいない」と主張バイデン米司法省は27日、バイデン米司法省のバイデン米司法省(Bdc)は、バイデン米司法省(BDC)の「武装した市民を望んでいない」との見解を明らかにした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 上半身は、あまり肌は出したくないけれど、フィットネス水着とも違うものを探していて巡り会いました。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIn the upper body, I didn't want to get my skin out too much, but I was looking for something different from my fitness swimsuit.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI didn’t want to give out much skin on the upper body, but I went around looking for something different from fitness swimsuit.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON7) Yeah, so there's another thing,\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSONY7)Yeah,sothere'sanother別のthing,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n（人7）是的，所以还有另一件事，\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 非常に手切れ性が良く、まっすぐに切れます。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is very short-cut and can be cut straight.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nVery good hand cutting and straight cutting.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ah, the only the only caveat that I'm finding now is going with interspeech is like they won't allow us a space in the proceedings, which may deter some of the participants, I am not sure how much they will be excited to publish a paper in archive.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nああ、私が今見つけている唯一の注意点は、interspeechで起こっているのは、参加者の一部を阻止する可能性のある議事録のスペースを許可しないようなもので\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n啊，我现在发现的唯一警告是，他们不允许我们在会议记录中留出空间，这可能会阻止一些与会者，我不确定他们会多么兴奋地在档案中发表论文。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Last season's runners-up were two goals to good at the break.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n赛季的亚军在休息时分差了两球.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n上赛季的亚军在中场休息时打进了两个进球。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And guess what?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして何を推測しますか?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAndguess猜测what?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: （朝鮮新報）\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(Korean News)\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(Chosen Shimpo)\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Clearly I really liked the Stylos considering the fact that every time a new one came out, I purchased it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n明らかに私は本当に新しいものが出てくるたびに、私はそれを購入したという事実を考慮してStylosが好きでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n很明显，我非常喜欢Stylos，因为每次有新产品上市，我都会购买。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A decent training tool but it really needs to have some sort of Safety Lock over the shock button( been pressed more on accident when it's in my pocket then I've actually intended to use it) my dogs even accidentally zapped herself after stepping on the remote.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nまともなトレーニングツールですが、それは本当にショックボタンの上にある種の安全ロックを持っている必要があります (それが私のポケットにあるとき、私は実際にそれを使うつもりでした) 私の犬は誤ってリモートを踏んだ後に自分自身をザップしました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nまともなトレーニングツールですが、それは本当にショックボタンの上に安全ロックのいくつかの種類を持っている必要があります(それが私のポケットの中にあるとき、私は実際にそれを使うつもりでした)私の犬はリモコンを踏んだ後に誤って自分自身をザッピングしました。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: He detailed the postbacklash changes at Balenciaga: \"restructuring the image department,\" conducting more internal and external checks for campaign imagery, and partnering with the National Children's Alliance to help \"thousands of kids in the process of overcoming trauma and dealing with their mental health.\"\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n彼はバレンシアガでの反発後の変化について詳しく説明しました:「画像部門の再構築」、キャンペーン画像の内外のチェックの強化、全米児童同盟との提携による「トラウマを克服し、メンタルヘルスに対処する過程にある何千人もの子供たち」を支援しています。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他详细介绍了巴黎世家的强烈反对变化：“重组形象部门”，对竞选图像进行更多的内部和外部检查，并与全国儿童联盟合作，帮助“成千上万的孩子克服创伤和处理他们的心理健康”。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But it allows to move fast and that's why it's ideal for small hacks.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nしかし、それは速く動くことを可能にし、それが小さなハッキングに理想的である理由です。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但它允许快速移动，这就是为什么它非常适合小型黑客攻击。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 厚さ0.2mmで作りのしっかりしたクリアホルダーです。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nA sturdy clear holder with a thickness of 0.2mm.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThis is a solid clear holder made from 0.2 mm thick.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And only the pronunciations that were observed three times or more, or something like that.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそして、3回以上観察された発音、またはそのようなものだけ。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n只有那些被观察到三次或更多次的发音，或者类似的东西。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 上半身はよくいる中年太りの腹って感じがしますが、下半身はデカ！という印象があります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nMy upper body feels like a middle-aged, fat belly, but the lower body is fat!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe upper body feels like a middle-aged overweight belly that is common, but the lower body is big!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: そうですね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThat's right.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 到着したばかりで設定まではしていませんが、カメラの映り具合を比較＆不具合チェックした段階です。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nI just arrived and haven't set it yet, but I've compared the camera's reflection and checked for bugs.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI have just arrived and have not set it up, but it is at the stage of comparing and checking the appearance of the camera.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I purchased this lamp to supplement the light my new vegetable seedlings were getting from the window.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私はこのランプを購入して、私の新しい野菜の苗木が窓から得た光を補足しました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我买了这只灯来补充我新买的蔬菜苗从窗户上发出的光线。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Not the case.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nケースじゃない\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n情况并非如此。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: TSAロックがココ数年のお気に入りで他にも幾つかもっていますが便利ですよね。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nTSA Rock is a favorite of Coco for a few years, but it is convenient.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nTSA Rock is my favorite for several years now, and there are several other things, but it is convenient.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 少量のスプレーでシリコーンオイルの被膜が出来ますのでさまざまな素材のすべりをよくします。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSilicone oil can be coated with a small amount of spray, so it better glide of various materials.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nA small amount of spray can create a silicone oil film, improving the slipperiness of various materials.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So... save your sanity and buy the Pampered Chef scoop.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nだから... 理性を保ち シェフのコップを買って\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nだから... あなたの正気を守り、パンパードシェフスクープを買う。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So that is not a benefit to their profiles.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれでは、経歴にプラスにならない。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nだからそれは彼らのプロフィールへの利益ではありません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: It took me over an hour to do a half-baked job of getting them screwed in so as to secure the baffle to the plug.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我花了一个多小时做了一个半生不熟的工作让他们螺丝，以确保挡板的插头。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我花了一个多小时来做一个半熟的工作,让他们拧紧,以便将挡板固定到插头。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Clearly I really liked the Stylos considering the fact that every time a new one came out, I purchased it.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n明らかに、私は新しいものが出てくるたびにそれを購入したという事実を考慮して、私は本当にStylosが好きでした。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n显然，我真的很喜欢Stylos，考虑到每次有新的出来，我都买了它。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Interventions: knowledge about things we can do to create change, within some confidence bounds\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n介入: 変化を生み出すために 必要な知識\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n介入:私たちが変化を生み出すためにできることについての知識を、ある程度の自信の範囲内で。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, I would like, [PERSON4] to be in touch with [PERSON2].\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nなので、 [PERSON4]くんには[PERSON2]さんと話してもらいたいの。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nだから、私は[PERSON4]が[PERSON2]と連絡を取りたいと思います。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: If I try and figure out my one rep max is I might not own enough weights to max out, or conversely it could seriously injure/kill me.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n如果我试图找出我最大的一个缺点，那就是我可能没有举重极限，或者反而，这可能会给我造成严重伤害/害死我。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n如果我尝试计算出我的一次最大重复次数，我可能没有足够的重量来达到最大极限，或者相反，它可能会严重伤害/杀死我。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Interestingly enough, the issue I had was that the inner band of the ring was actually turning my finger white and moist - kind of like the way a bandaid does after you leave it on for a long time.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n興味深いことに、私が抱えていた問題は、リングの内側のバンドが実際に私の指を白く湿らせていたことでした-あなたがそれを長い間つけたままにした後のバンドエイドのように-それのようなものです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n興味深いことに、私が抱えていた問題は、リングの内側のバンドが実際に私の指を白く湿らせていたことでした。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Schleswig-Holsteins Karnevalshochburg Marne hält trotz der gestiegenen Kosten am traditionellen Umzug fest. \"Wir ziehen unsere Veranstaltung durch\", sagt der Präsident der Karnevals-Gesellschaft, Heiko Claußen. Aber auch hier drücken die finanziellen Sorgen: Wenn nicht noch mehr Sponsoren gefunden würden oder die bisherigen noch mehr zusteuerten, müssten Rücklagen angetastet werden - \"das geht nicht jedes Jahr\". Das Defizit derzeit: etwa 200.000 Euro.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSchleswig-Holstein's Carnival Tower of Marne is holding on to the traditional move despite the increased costs. \"We are pulling our event through,\" says Carnival Society President Heiko Claußen. But here too, the financial woes are pressing: if more sponsors were not found or the previous ones had to go to the point where backlogs had to be tackled - \"this is not going every year.\" The deficit at the moment: about 200,000 euros.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSchleswig-Holstein's carnival stronghold Marne is sticking to the traditional move despite the increased costs. \"We are going through our event,\" says the president of the Carnival Society, Heiko Claußen. But here, too, the financial worries are pressing: If more sponsors were not found or the previous more contributed, reserves would have to be touched - \"that does not work every year.\" The deficit currently: About 200,000 euros.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 本商品を選ぶきっかけとなったのが、1台目2200ミリアンペアの内蔵型ヴェポライザーを利用しましたが、200度5分3セッションで電池切れ。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nWhat led me to choose this product was that I used the first 2200 milliamp built-in vaporizer, but the battery ran out at 200 degrees 5 minutes 3 sessions.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe reason I chose this product was the 1st 2200ma built-in vaporizer, but the battery ran out at 200 degrees 5 minutes 3 sessions.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The game's story, ideas and questions it inspires feel timely.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nゲームのストーリー、アイデア、そして問いかけがタイムリーだと感じる。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nゲームのストーリー、アイデア、質問はタイムリーに感じられます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: A 24-year-old man has subsequently been arrested in connection with the crash.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nその後、この事故に関連して24歳の男が逮捕された。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n随后，一名24岁的男子因与坠机事故有关而被捕。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: あとはグレーのコネクターを茶色と赤緑の配線に挟み込んでかしめる際にラジオペンチなど先が先細りのタイプでやると均等に力が入らず写真のようにプラスティックが割れてしまい装着できなくなります。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAlso, when crimping the gray connector between the brown and red and green wires, if you use a tapered type such as radio pliers, you will not be able to apply force evenly and the plastic will crack as shown in the photo, making it impossible to attach.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAfter that, when the gray connector is sandwiched between brown and red-green wiring, if you do it with a tapered tip type such as radio pliers, the force will not be applied evenly and the plastic will crack as shown in the photo and you will not be able to install it.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: お尻など立体的な作りではないので 変な隙間が出来たり下がりやすくしっくりきません。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nSince it is not a three-dimensional structure such as a buttock, it is easy to create strange gaps and fall easily.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nSince it is not a three-dimensional construction such as the buttocks, it is easy to create a strange gap or fall, and it does not fit.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Very much worth having a go at.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n試してみる価値がある\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n非常值得我们去尝试.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Wie es in einem Bericht der Deutschen Presse-Agentur (dpa) heißt, habe Modrow den neuen Staat \"durchaus kritisch\" gesehen. Zu schnell sei die deutsche Einheit vollzogen worden, zu bedingungslos sei die DDR untergegangen, und zu einseitig sei sie als \"Unrechtsstaat\" verdammt worden, habe Modrow laut dpa in vielen Interviews kritisiert.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAccording to a report by the Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa), Modrow had taken a \"thoroughly critical\" view of the new state. German unity had been achieved too quickly, the GDR had gone down too unconditionally, and it had been condemned too one-sidedly as an \"unjust state,\" Modrow had criticized in many interviews, according to dpa.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nAccording to a report by the German Press Agency (dpa), Modrow was \"quite critical\" of the new state. German reunification had been accomplished too quickly, the GDR had gone down too unconditionally, and it had been condemned too one-sidedly as an \"unjust state,\" Modrow had criticized in many interviews, according to dpa.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: However, with heavier sweater or sweatshirt, it should be fine.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n但是,用更重的毛衣或运动衫,应该很好。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n不过，搭配较厚重的毛衣或运动衫应该没问题。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Instead, it suggests to use a USB plug or computer.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n相反，它建议使用USB插头或计算机。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n相反，它建议使用USB插头或电脑。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The compressed time frame from May 10 to the 26th was well presented with the clock 7 turning pages...\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n时间从5月10日到26日, 时间表表表现得很好,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n5月10日至26日的压缩时间框架，随着时钟7页的翻页被很好地呈现出来……\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: And we even had a thing like if the paper was not good enough for the PBML, but if the tool was presented at the MT marathon.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n我们甚至会在PBML的论文中表现得不好,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我们甚至有这样的事情，如果论文对 PBML 来说不够好，但是如果工具出现在 MT 马拉松上。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I think my new job has been good for him - two free roams a day while I work, at fairly predictable times.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n私は私の新しい仕事は彼のために良かったと思います-私が働いている間、かなり予測可能な時間に、一日二回の無料ローミング。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我认为我的新工作对他有好处 - 我工作时他每天可以自由活动两次，时间相当稳定。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Czech to Ukrainian, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Ty můžeš na překladač, ale ne si s někým dopisovat.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nТи можеш на перекладача, але не листуватися з кимось.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nТи можеш користуватися перекладачем, але не можеш з кимось листуватися.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: From here, the size of the groups drops significantly.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n群体的规模从此就会大幅下降.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n从这里开始，群体的规模明显下降。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The 38-year-old female was rushed to Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy following the crash on Broad Street in Cowdenbeath on Friday around 1.30pm.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n38歳の女性は、金曜日の午後1時30分頃にカウデンビースのブロードストリートでの墜落に続いて、カークカルディのビクトリア病院に急いでいました。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n这名38岁的女性在周五下午1:30左右在Cowdenbeath的Broad Street发生车祸后被送往Kirkcaldy的维多利亚医院。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Not only was his claim insensitive, it was also a lie.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n他不仅是无情的,而且是谎言.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n他的说法不仅缺乏敏感性，而且还是个谎言。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 曲はやっぱりかっこいいですね！\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe song is cool after all!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe song is really cool!\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But this is, like I'm just describing it vaguely because I myself do not have an exact idea how to do it, but it might have been an interesting, distinct scenario.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n具体的にどうやってやるかわからないので 曖昧に説明しているだけですが 興味深い 独特のシナリオだったかもしれません\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nしかし、これは私が漠然と説明しているように、私自身が正確な方法を持っていないので、それは興味深い、明確なシナリオだったかもしれません。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: But for strong and firm future growth.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n对于强的未来的增长.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n但为了未来强劲而稳固的增长。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There is significant evidence that real-world communication cannot be reduced to sending signals with context-independent meaning.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n現実世界の通信は、文脈に依存しない意味を持つ信号を送信することに減らすことができないという重要な証拠があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n有重要证据表明，现实世界的通信不能简化为发送具有与上下文无关的含义的信号。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON4) And I think only two or three sentences were correctly inflected in the incorrect context, like the translation was wrong.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n(PERSON4) そして、訳が間違っているような間違った文脈の中で、正しく屈折していたのは2つか3つのセンテンスだけだったと思います。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(PERSON4) そして、翻訳が間違っていたように、間違った文脈で正しく曲解されたのは2、3文だけだと思います。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: イヤホンは耳が痛くて使えず、夜はPCを使うのも気が引ける音量です。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe earbuds have a sore ear and can't be used, and it's a sound that can be used at night.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nI can't use the earphones because they hurt my ears, and the volume is too loud to use my PC at night.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: (PERSON1) Yeah, because I think it's a method which is very easy to test, and it always should be tested in contrast with the two encoders, and I would expect sometimes to be better and sometimes to be worse than the two encoders set up, depending on the exact task like what exactly is the second thing that you are encoding.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nテストするのは簡単です. 2つのエンコーダと対比してテストすべきです. テストの仕方は, 設定した2つのエンコーダよりも,\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n(PERSON1)是的,因为我认为这是一种非常容易测试的方法,它总是应该与两个编码器进行对比测试,我希望有时会比设置的两个编码器更好,有时会更糟,这取决于确切的任务,如你正在编码的第二件事情。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: The FAI Cup holders defeated last season's league winners at the Brandywell thanks to first-half goals from Will Patching and Michael Duffy.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nFAIカップで優勝した同チームは、前半のウィル・パッチングとマイケル・ダフィのゴールにより、昨年のリーグ優勝チームにブランディウェルで勝利した。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n凭借威尔·帕钦 (Will Patching) 和迈克尔·达菲 (Michael Duffy) 上半场的进球，FAI 杯卫冕冠军在布兰迪韦尔球场 (Brandywell) 击败了上赛季的联赛冠军。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Wells Fargo, which is servicing the mortgage on 40 Wall Street, \"has reached out to the borrower for a status of leasing developments\" and the plans to improve the property's performance, according to the filing, Bloomberg reported.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n資産の業績向上を目指す計画と\",貸し借入者の方へ連絡してきました\"と ブルームバーグが報じた.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nブルームバーグによると、40ウォールストリートの住宅ローンにサービスを提供しているウェルズファーゴは 、 「 リース開発の状況と不動産のパフォーマンスを改善する計画について借り手に連絡した」と報告しています。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 大船渡線は一ノ関―気仙沼間の上下線で始発から午後５時３０分ごろまで、釜石線は盛岡―釜石間の下り線で始発から正午ごろまで、上り線で始発から午前１１時ごろまで運転を見合わせる。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe Okinawa-Hotome Line starts from the up and down line from Enokina-kaisenyama until about 5:30 p.m.; the Okinawa-Hotome Line starts from the down line from Osaka-Kaname-kaisenma until about noon; and the Okinawa-Ryu Line starts from the up and down line until about 11 a.m.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe Ofunato Line is suspended from the first train to around 5: 30 p.m. on the inbound and outbound lines between Ichinoseki and Kesennuma. The Kamaishi Line is suspended from the first train to around noon on the outbound lines between Morioka and Kamaishi, and from the first train to around 11: 00 a.m. on the inbound lines.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: There's areas that could use some polish.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n磨く必要がある部分があります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n有些地方可能需要擦亮。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: So, I'll write it down.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nそれで、それを書き留めます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nだから、書き留めておきます。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: As the fecal matter gets in between the cracks of the device requiring you to disassemble the entire thing to clean it properly and get the smell out.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n糞が装置の裂け目に入ると 装置を分解して 匂いを消し去ります\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n因为粪便会进入设备的缝隙中，需要你拆解整个设备才能彻底清理并去除气味。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from German to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Die Rentenreform gilt als eines der wichtigsten Vorhaben von Präsident Macron. Während der Corona-Pandemie wurde ein erster Anlauf zur Umsetzung der Reform abgebrochen, schon damals gab es massive Proteste und Streiks. Schon etliche Präsidenten vor Macron bemühten sich mit unterschiedlichem Erfolg um Reformen des französischen Rentensystems - breiter Protest und Streiks waren allen gewiss.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPension reform is considered one of President Macron’s most important plans. During the corona pandemic, a first attempt to implement the reform was aborted, with massive protests and strikes already taking place. Presidents before Macron have pursued reforms of France’s pension system with varying degrees of success - widespread protests and strikes were all certain.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe pension reform is considered one of President Macron's most important projects. During the Corona pandemic, an initial attempt to implement the reform was abandoned, with massive protests and strikes already taking place at that time. Several presidents before Macron have tried with varying success to reform the French pension system - widespread protests and strikes were a certainty for all of them.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 県競馬組合の調教始め式は１０日、水沢、盛岡両競馬場で行われ、関係者が人馬の安全を祈願し、馬場を清めた。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nThe opening ceremony of the Prefectural Horse Racing Association was held in Mizazawa and Morioka Racecourses on the 10th, and officials prayed for the safety of the horse and cleaned the racecourse.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nThe training commencement ceremony for the prefectural horse racing association was held at both the Mizusawa and Morioka racecourses on the 10th, and the people involved prayed for the safety of people and horses and cleaned up the racetracks.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 勝手に自機が動いて操作できなくなる。\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nIt is not possible to operate on its own.\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\ni can't control it.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: First off, I have to say the color is loveeeee.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nまず最初に、その色が大好きだと言わなければなりません。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n最初に、私は色がloveeeeであると言わなければならない。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: I didn't watch the CNN town hall, but it seems as if Trump said exactly the same things he says every time he opens his mouth or presses Send on his phone.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nCNNのタウンホールは見ていませんが、トランプは口を開いたり、携帯で送信を押すたびにまったく同じことを言っているようです。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我没有看 CNN 市政厅的节目，但特朗普每次张嘴或按手机上的“发送”键时所说的话似乎都一模一样。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Do any of these characters talk human beings?\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nこれらのキャラクターは人間と話しますか?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nこれらのキャラクターのいずれかが人間と話しますか?\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Geeky student Arnie Cunningham falls for Christine, a rusty 1958 Plymouth Fury, and becomes obsessed with restoring the classic automobile to her former glory.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n気まぐれな学生のアーニー・カニンガムは、さびた1958年のプリマス・フューリーであるクリスティンに堕ち、古典的な自動車を以前の栄光に戻すことに夢中になります。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n极客学生阿尼·坎宁安 (Arnie Cunningham) 爱上了一辆生锈的 1958 年普利茅斯怒火 (Plymouth Fury) 克里斯汀 (Christine)，并痴迷于将这辆经典汽车恢复到昔日的辉煌。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Comes with a cover and while it may not have much functional use, it really keeps it looking sharp.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nカバーが付属しており、機能的な用途はあまりないかもしれませんが、シャープな外観を保ちます。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n配有一个盖子，虽然它可能没有太多的功能用途，但它确实让它看起来很锋利。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: 自動車スタッドレスタイヤ 空気圧を高めにしても雪道での走行には関係ないですか\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nAutomobile studless tire. Does increasing the air pressure affect driving on snow roads?\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\ncar, studless tires, higher air pressure, nothing to do with driving on snowy roads.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Pedestrian dies in hospital after crash with car in Cowdenbeath as man arrested\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n行人在考登比思与汽车相撞后在医院死亡，因为男子被捕\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n在Cowdenbeath与汽车相撞后，行人在医院死亡，男子被捕\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Chinese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: Apple Maps wins.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n苹果地图获胜。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nApple Maps 胜出\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from Japanese to English, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: パワフルで長寿命!\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\nPowerful and long-lived!\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\nPowerful and long life.\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful translation evaluator. You will provide a verdict in a strict format, do not include any other text. Just letter \"A\" or \"B\".",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "Please act as an impartial judge and evaluate the quality of the translations provided by two AI assistants in response to the user's request below.\nSelect the assistant that best adheres to the user's instructions while producing the highest-quality translation overall.\nBegin by comparing the two translations and reason before you answer.\nAvoid personal opinions or biases, and do not favor one assistant over the other.\nYour judgment should be based solely on the quality of the translations and their alignment with the user's instructions.\nBe objective and impartial. If both translations are equally good, you can choose the one that you prefer.\n\nAfter providing your explanation, response strictly in this format: \n\n<think>\n... your reasoning process ...\n</think>\n<answer>\n[A] if Assistant A is better, [B] if Assistant B is better\n</answer>\n\n[User Instruction]\nTranslate this text from English to Japanese, maintaining the tone, accuracy and ensuring fluency: No idea.\n[End of User Instruction]\n\n[Start of Assistant A's Response]\n全然分からない。\n[End of Assistant A's Response]\n\n[Start of Assistant B's Response]\n我不知道。\n[End of Assistant B's Response]\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 49
Size of downloaded dataset files:
89.7 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
89.7 MB
Number of rows:
270,354