Create README.md
#2
by
TMVishnu
- opened
- .gitattributes +58 -2
- README.md +56 -126
- dataset_infos.json +0 -18
- data/edges.npz → edges.npz +0 -0
- data/features.npy → features.npy +0 -0
- final_embeddings.pt +3 -0
- loaded_data.pkl +3 -0
- processed_df.pkl +3 -0
- data/watch_gnn_data.pt → watch_gnn_data.pt +0 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,59 @@
|
|
1 |
-
*.
|
2 |
-
*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
*.npy filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
*.7z filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
2 |
+
*.arrow filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
3 |
+
*.bin filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
4 |
+
*.bz2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
5 |
+
*.ckpt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
6 |
+
*.ftz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
7 |
+
*.gz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
8 |
+
*.h5 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
9 |
+
*.joblib filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
10 |
+
*.lfs.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
11 |
+
*.lz4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
12 |
+
*.mds filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
13 |
+
*.mlmodel filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
14 |
+
*.model filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
15 |
+
*.msgpack filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
16 |
*.npy filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
17 |
+
*.npz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
18 |
+
*.onnx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
19 |
+
*.ot filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
20 |
+
*.parquet filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
21 |
+
*.pb filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
22 |
+
*.pickle filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
23 |
+
*.pkl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
24 |
+
*.pt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
25 |
+
*.pth filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
26 |
+
*.rar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
27 |
+
*.safetensors filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
28 |
+
saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
29 |
+
*.tar.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
30 |
+
*.tar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
31 |
+
*.tflite filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
32 |
+
*.tgz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
33 |
+
*.wasm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
34 |
+
*.xz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
35 |
+
*.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
36 |
+
*.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
37 |
+
*tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
38 |
+
# Audio files - uncompressed
|
39 |
+
*.pcm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
40 |
+
*.sam filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
41 |
+
*.raw filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
42 |
+
# Audio files - compressed
|
43 |
+
*.aac filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
44 |
+
*.flac filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
45 |
+
*.mp3 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
46 |
+
*.ogg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
47 |
+
*.wav filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
48 |
+
# Image files - uncompressed
|
49 |
+
*.bmp filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
50 |
+
*.gif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
51 |
+
*.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
52 |
+
*.tiff filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
53 |
+
# Image files - compressed
|
54 |
+
*.jpg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
55 |
+
*.jpeg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
56 |
+
*.webp filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
57 |
+
# Video files - compressed
|
58 |
+
*.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
59 |
+
*.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -10,61 +10,7 @@ size_categories:
|
|
10 |
|
11 |
# Watch Market Analysis Graph Neural Network Dataset
|
12 |
|
13 |
-
##
|
14 |
-
|
15 |
-
- Github link to the code through which this dataset was generated from: [watch-market-gnn-code](https://github.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code)
|
16 |
-
- Link to interactive EDA that is hosted on a website : [Watch Market Analysis Report](https://incomparable-torrone-ccda90.netlify.app/)
|
17 |
-
|
18 |
-
## Table of Contents
|
19 |
-
[Summary](#summary)
|
20 |
-
[Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
|
21 |
-
[Technical Details](#technical-details)
|
22 |
-
[Exploratory Data Analysis](#exploratory-data-analysis)
|
23 |
-
[Ethics and Limitations](#ethics-and-limitations)
|
24 |
-
[Usage](#usage)
|
25 |
-
|
26 |
-
<details>
|
27 |
-
<summary>Detailed Table of Contents</summary>
|
28 |
-
|
29 |
-
* Summary
|
30 |
-
* Key Statistics
|
31 |
-
* Primary Use Cases
|
32 |
-
* Dataset Description
|
33 |
-
* Data Structure
|
34 |
-
* Features
|
35 |
-
* Network Properties
|
36 |
-
* Processing Parameters
|
37 |
-
* Technical Details
|
38 |
-
* Power Analysis
|
39 |
-
* Implementation Details
|
40 |
-
* Network Architecture
|
41 |
-
* Embedding Dimensions
|
42 |
-
* Network Parameters
|
43 |
-
* Condition Scoring
|
44 |
-
* Exploratory Data Analysis
|
45 |
-
* Brand Distribution
|
46 |
-
* Feature Correlations
|
47 |
-
* Market Structure Visualizations
|
48 |
-
* UMAP Analysis
|
49 |
-
* t-SNE Visualization
|
50 |
-
* PCA Analysis
|
51 |
-
* Network Visualizations
|
52 |
-
* Ethics and Limitations
|
53 |
-
* Data Collection and Privacy
|
54 |
-
* Known Biases
|
55 |
-
* Usage Guidelines
|
56 |
-
* License
|
57 |
-
* Usage
|
58 |
-
* Required Files
|
59 |
-
* Loading the Dataset
|
60 |
-
* Code Examples
|
61 |
-
|
62 |
-
</details>
|
63 |
-
|
64 |
-
---
|
65 |
-
|
66 |
-
|
67 |
-
## Summary
|
68 |
|
69 |
This dataset transforms traditional watch market data into a Graph Neural Network (GNN) structure, specifically designed to capture the complex dynamics of the pre-owned luxury watch market.
|
70 |
It addresses three key market characteristics that traditional recommendation systems often miss:
|
@@ -119,82 +65,30 @@ Key features include:
|
|
119 |
- Edge Generation Batch: 32 watches
|
120 |
- Network Architecture: Combined GCN and GAT layers with 4 attention heads
|
121 |
|
122 |
-
## Technical Details
|
123 |
-
|
124 |
-
### Power Analysis
|
125 |
-
Minimum sample requirements based on statistical analysis:
|
126 |
-
- Basic Network: 10,671 nodes (95% confidence, 3% margin)
|
127 |
-
- GNN Requirements: 14,400 samples (feature space dimensionality)
|
128 |
-
- Brand Coverage: 768 watches per brand
|
129 |
-
- Price Segments: 4,320 watches per segment
|
130 |
-
|
131 |
-
Current dataset (284,491 watches) exceeds requirements with:
|
132 |
-
- 5,000+ samples per major brand
|
133 |
-
- 50,000+ samples per price segment
|
134 |
-
- Sufficient network density
|
135 |
-
|
136 |
-
### Implementation Details
|
137 |
-
|
138 |
-
#### Network Architecture
|
139 |
-
- 3 GNN layers with residual connections
|
140 |
-
- 64 hidden channels
|
141 |
-
- 20% dropout rate
|
142 |
-
- 4 attention heads
|
143 |
-
- Learning rate: 0.001
|
144 |
-
|
145 |
-
#### Embedding Dimensions
|
146 |
-
- Brand: 128
|
147 |
-
- Material: 64
|
148 |
-
- Movement: 64
|
149 |
-
- Temporal: 32
|
150 |
-
|
151 |
-
#### Network Parameters
|
152 |
-
- Connections per watch: 3-5
|
153 |
-
- Similarity threshold: 70%
|
154 |
-
- Batch size: 50 watches
|
155 |
-
- Processing window: 1000 watches
|
156 |
-
|
157 |
-
#### Condition Scoring
|
158 |
-
- New: 1.0
|
159 |
-
- Unworn: 0.95
|
160 |
-
- Very Good: 0.8
|
161 |
-
- Good: 0.7
|
162 |
-
- Fair: 0.5
|
163 |
|
164 |
## Exploratory Data Analysis
|
165 |
|
166 |
-
**NOTE:**
|
167 |
-
Only certain selected visualizations have been mentioned here, to see all the visualizations that have been explored in high-quality interactive graphs, please visit this site:
|
168 |
-
[Watch Market Analysis Report](https://incomparable-torrone-ccda90.netlify.app/)
|
169 |
-
|
170 |
### Brand Distribution
|
171 |
-
|
172 |
-
![Brand Distribution Treemap](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/2.png)
|
173 |
-
|
174 |
The treemap visualization provides a hierarchical view of market presence:
|
175 |
- Rolex dominates with the highest representation, reflecting its market leadership
|
176 |
-
- Omega and Seiko follow as major players, indicating
|
177 |
- Distribution reveals clear tiers in the luxury watch market
|
178 |
- Brand representation correlates with market positioning and availability
|
179 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
181 |
### Feature Correlations
|
182 |
-
|
183 |
-
![Feature Correlation Matrix](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/3.png)
|
184 |
-
|
185 |
The correlation matrix reveals important market dynamics:
|
186 |
- **Size vs. Year**: Positive correlation indicating a trend toward larger case sizes in modern watches
|
187 |
- **Price vs. Size**: Moderate correlation showing larger watches generally command higher prices
|
188 |
- **Price vs. Year**: Notably low correlation, demonstrating that vintage watches maintain value
|
189 |
- Each feature contributes unique information, validated by the lack of strong correlations across all variables
|
190 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
192 |
### Market Structure Visualizations
|
193 |
|
194 |
#### UMAP Analysis
|
195 |
-
|
196 |
-
![UMAP Visualization](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/4.png)
|
197 |
-
|
198 |
The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
|
199 |
- Rolex maintains a dominant central position around coordinates (0, -5), showing unparalleled brand cohesion
|
200 |
- Omega and Breitling cluster in the left segment, indicating strategic market alignment
|
@@ -202,11 +96,9 @@ The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
|
|
202 |
- Premium timepieces (yellower/greener hues) show tighter clustering, suggesting standardized luxury attributes
|
203 |
- Smaller, specialized clusters indicate distinct horological collections and style categories
|
204 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
206 |
#### t-SNE Visualization
|
207 |
-
|
208 |
-
![t-SNE Analysis](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/5.png)
|
209 |
-
|
210 |
T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from $50 to $3.2M:
|
211 |
- **Entry-Level Segment ($50-$4,000)**
|
212 |
- Anchored by Seiko in the left segment
|
@@ -217,13 +109,12 @@ T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from
|
|
217 |
- Cartier demonstrates strategic positioning between luxury and mid-range
|
218 |
- **Ultra-Luxury Segment ($35,000-$3.2M)**
|
219 |
- Dominated by Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet
|
220 |
-
- Clear separation in
|
221 |
- Strong brand clustering indicating market alignment
|
222 |
|
223 |
-
|
224 |
-
|
225 |
-
![PCA Visualization](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/6.png)
|
226 |
|
|
|
227 |
Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total explained variance:
|
228 |
- **First Principal Component (31.3%)**
|
229 |
- Predominantly captures price dynamics
|
@@ -234,33 +125,28 @@ Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total ex
|
|
234 |
- **Brand Trajectory**
|
235 |
- Natural progression from Seiko through Longines, Breitling, and Omega
|
236 |
- Culminates in Rolex and Patek Philippe
|
237 |
-
- Diagonal trend line serves as
|
238 |
- **Market Implications**
|
239 |
- Successful brands occupy optimal positions along both dimensions
|
240 |
- Clear differentiation between adjacent competitors
|
241 |
- Evidence of strategic market positioning
|
242 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
244 |
#### Network Visualizations
|
245 |
|
246 |
-
|
247 |
**Force-Directed Graph**
|
248 |
-
|
249 |
-
![Force-Directed Graph](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/7.png)
|
250 |
-
|
251 |
The force-directed layout reveals natural market clustering:
|
252 |
- Richard Mille's peripheral positioning highlights ultra-luxury strategy
|
253 |
- Dense central clustering shows mainstream luxury brand interconnectivity
|
254 |
- Edge patterns reveal shared market characteristics
|
255 |
- Node proximity indicates competitive positioning
|
256 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
258 |
**Starburst Visualization**
|
259 |
-
|
260 |
-
![Starburst Graph](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/8.png)
|
261 |
-
|
262 |
Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
|
263 |
-
- Central node represents
|
264 |
- Green nodes show brand territories with strategic spacing
|
265 |
- Blue peripheral nodes indicate individual timepieces
|
266 |
- Node density reveals:
|
@@ -269,6 +155,8 @@ Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
|
|
269 |
- Segment diversification
|
270 |
- Balanced spacing between brand nodes indicates market segmentation
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
273 |
## Ethics and Limitations
|
274 |
|
@@ -339,6 +227,48 @@ While requiring:
|
|
339 |
- Preserve attributions
|
340 |
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
## Usage
|
343 |
|
344 |
### Required Files
|
|
|
10 |
|
11 |
# Watch Market Analysis Graph Neural Network Dataset
|
12 |
|
13 |
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
15 |
This dataset transforms traditional watch market data into a Graph Neural Network (GNN) structure, specifically designed to capture the complex dynamics of the pre-owned luxury watch market.
|
16 |
It addresses three key market characteristics that traditional recommendation systems often miss:
|
|
|
65 |
- Edge Generation Batch: 32 watches
|
66 |
- Network Architecture: Combined GCN and GAT layers with 4 attention heads
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
69 |
## Exploratory Data Analysis
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
### Brand Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
The treemap visualization provides a hierarchical view of market presence:
|
73 |
- Rolex dominates with the highest representation, reflecting its market leadership
|
74 |
+
- Omega and Seiko follow as major players, indicating strong market presence
|
75 |
- Distribution reveals clear tiers in the luxury watch market
|
76 |
- Brand representation correlates with market positioning and availability
|
77 |
|
78 |
+
[Treemap Image]
|
79 |
|
80 |
### Feature Correlations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
The correlation matrix reveals important market dynamics:
|
82 |
- **Size vs. Year**: Positive correlation indicating a trend toward larger case sizes in modern watches
|
83 |
- **Price vs. Size**: Moderate correlation showing larger watches generally command higher prices
|
84 |
- **Price vs. Year**: Notably low correlation, demonstrating that vintage watches maintain value
|
85 |
- Each feature contributes unique information, validated by the lack of strong correlations across all variables
|
86 |
|
87 |
+
[Correlation Matrix Image]
|
88 |
|
89 |
### Market Structure Visualizations
|
90 |
|
91 |
#### UMAP Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
|
93 |
- Rolex maintains a dominant central position around coordinates (0, -5), showing unparalleled brand cohesion
|
94 |
- Omega and Breitling cluster in the left segment, indicating strategic market alignment
|
|
|
96 |
- Premium timepieces (yellower/greener hues) show tighter clustering, suggesting standardized luxury attributes
|
97 |
- Smaller, specialized clusters indicate distinct horological collections and style categories
|
98 |
|
99 |
+
[UMAP Image]
|
100 |
|
101 |
#### t-SNE Visualization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from $50 to $3.2M:
|
103 |
- **Entry-Level Segment ($50-$4,000)**
|
104 |
- Anchored by Seiko in the left segment
|
|
|
109 |
- Cartier demonstrates strategic positioning between luxury and mid-range
|
110 |
- **Ultra-Luxury Segment ($35,000-$3.2M)**
|
111 |
- Dominated by Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet
|
112 |
+
- Clear separation in right segment
|
113 |
- Strong brand clustering indicating market alignment
|
114 |
|
115 |
+
[t-SNE Image]
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
117 |
+
#### PCA Analysis
|
118 |
Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total explained variance:
|
119 |
- **First Principal Component (31.3%)**
|
120 |
- Predominantly captures price dynamics
|
|
|
125 |
- **Brand Trajectory**
|
126 |
- Natural progression from Seiko through Longines, Breitling, and Omega
|
127 |
- Culminates in Rolex and Patek Philippe
|
128 |
+
- Diagonal trend line serves as market positioning indicator
|
129 |
- **Market Implications**
|
130 |
- Successful brands occupy optimal positions along both dimensions
|
131 |
- Clear differentiation between adjacent competitors
|
132 |
- Evidence of strategic market positioning
|
133 |
|
134 |
+
[PCA Image]
|
135 |
|
136 |
#### Network Visualizations
|
137 |
|
|
|
138 |
**Force-Directed Graph**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
The force-directed layout reveals natural market clustering:
|
140 |
- Richard Mille's peripheral positioning highlights ultra-luxury strategy
|
141 |
- Dense central clustering shows mainstream luxury brand interconnectivity
|
142 |
- Edge patterns reveal shared market characteristics
|
143 |
- Node proximity indicates competitive positioning
|
144 |
|
145 |
+
[Force-Directed Graph Image]
|
146 |
|
147 |
**Starburst Visualization**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
|
149 |
+
- Central node represents overall market
|
150 |
- Green nodes show brand territories with strategic spacing
|
151 |
- Blue peripheral nodes indicate individual timepieces
|
152 |
- Node density reveals:
|
|
|
155 |
- Segment diversification
|
156 |
- Balanced spacing between brand nodes indicates market segmentation
|
157 |
|
158 |
+
[Starburst Graph Image]
|
159 |
+
|
160 |
|
161 |
## Ethics and Limitations
|
162 |
|
|
|
227 |
- Preserve attributions
|
228 |
|
229 |
|
230 |
+
## Technical Details
|
231 |
+
|
232 |
+
### Power Analysis
|
233 |
+
Minimum sample requirements based on statistical analysis:
|
234 |
+
- Basic Network: 10,671 nodes (95% confidence, 3% margin)
|
235 |
+
- GNN Requirements: 14,400 samples (feature space dimensionality)
|
236 |
+
- Brand Coverage: 768 watches per brand
|
237 |
+
- Price Segments: 4,320 watches per segment
|
238 |
+
|
239 |
+
Current dataset (284,491 watches) exceeds requirements with:
|
240 |
+
- 5,000+ samples per major brand
|
241 |
+
- 50,000+ samples per price segment
|
242 |
+
- Sufficient network density
|
243 |
+
|
244 |
+
### Implementation Details
|
245 |
+
|
246 |
+
#### Network Architecture
|
247 |
+
- 3 GNN layers with residual connections
|
248 |
+
- 64 hidden channels
|
249 |
+
- 20% dropout rate
|
250 |
+
- 4 attention heads
|
251 |
+
- Learning rate: 0.001
|
252 |
+
|
253 |
+
#### Embedding Dimensions
|
254 |
+
- Brand: 128
|
255 |
+
- Material: 64
|
256 |
+
- Movement: 64
|
257 |
+
- Temporal: 32
|
258 |
+
|
259 |
+
#### Network Parameters
|
260 |
+
- Connections per watch: 3-5
|
261 |
+
- Similarity threshold: 70%
|
262 |
+
- Batch size: 50 watches
|
263 |
+
- Processing window: 1000 watches
|
264 |
+
|
265 |
+
#### Condition Scoring
|
266 |
+
- New: 1.0
|
267 |
+
- Unworn: 0.95
|
268 |
+
- Very Good: 0.8
|
269 |
+
- Good: 0.7
|
270 |
+
- Fair: 0.5
|
271 |
+
|
272 |
## Usage
|
273 |
|
274 |
### Required Files
|
dataset_infos.json
DELETED
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
|
|
1 |
-
{
|
2 |
-
"default": {
|
3 |
-
"description": "Watch Market GNN Dataset",
|
4 |
-
"homepage": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/TMVishnu/watch-market-gnn",
|
5 |
-
"license": "apache-2.0",
|
6 |
-
"features": {
|
7 |
-
"watch_gnn_data": "torch_geometric",
|
8 |
-
"edges": "numpy",
|
9 |
-
"features": "numpy"
|
10 |
-
},
|
11 |
-
"task_templates": [
|
12 |
-
{
|
13 |
-
"task": "graph-ml",
|
14 |
-
"task_categories": ["graph-ml"]
|
15 |
-
}
|
16 |
-
]
|
17 |
-
}
|
18 |
-
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data/edges.npz → edges.npz
RENAMED
File without changes
|
data/features.npy → features.npy
RENAMED
File without changes
|
final_embeddings.pt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
2 |
+
oid sha256:313cc9d898844574164a483e87759df9bb9105d5fd837d2a0f301c0215de417b
|
3 |
+
size 291320009
|
loaded_data.pkl
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
2 |
+
oid sha256:b9c0fffa25354d19a3f933a3034eb96c7d49d97bf0aac4739c97951c495d5edf
|
3 |
+
size 36141191
|
processed_df.pkl
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
2 |
+
oid sha256:ef91906c5313e76804e010ecbf95bfc960bdf8f72973b7f6ae360913925cf709
|
3 |
+
size 615675312
|
data/watch_gnn_data.pt → watch_gnn_data.pt
RENAMED
File without changes
|