content
stringlengths 1
15.9M
|
|---|
\section{Introduction}\label{section:intro}
Understanding the process of galaxy evolution, particularly in its
earliest stages, is a major goal of many research projects in
astrophysics today. Galaxies observed locally are typically
near the end of their evolution, having
assembled a majority of their stars at high redshift ($z>1$), closer to the peak of
cosmic star formation \citep{madau96,lilly96,hopk06,sobral12}.
Star-forming
galaxies at high redshift are often found to be composed of a few
large ($\sim1$ kpc) star-forming complexes (``clumps'') with high
molecular gas content (gas fractions of 20-50\%) and high
star-formation efficiencies \citep{daddi10,tacc10,elme11}. These
complexes are more massive (with typical gas masses of
$10^{8}-10^{9}$ $M_{\odot}$) and form stars more efficiently
than similar regions observed in the Milky Way \citep{elme05,forster11,swinbank11,wisnioski12}.
If star forming regions at high redshift obey local scaling relations \citep{schmidt59,kenni98}, they require high molecular-gas
surface densities to fuel the extreme levels of star formation
observed \citep{guo12}.
Clumpy, irregular galaxies at high redshift have been observed
using integral-field spectroscopy (IFS). For studies of galaxy
dynamics, IFS data is used
to produce detailed two dimensional kinematics maps not possible using traditional
spectroscopic techniques. In recent IFS studies, roughly 1/3
of the high-redshift, clumpy galaxies display the random motions
expected for galaxies undergoing major mergers. The remainder are
either too compact to be reliably classified by the employed
methods, or display ordered rotation characteristic of disk
galaxies. Disk fractions were found to be $20-50\%$ for a number of
samples
\citep{genzel08,forster09,law09,wright09,wisnioski11}. One key
observation of clumpy high-redshift disks are large values of velocity dispersion (as high as $\sim$90
km s$^{-1}$) compared with values of 20-30 km s$^{-1}$ seen locally \citep{andersen06}. \citet{glaz13} provides a comprehensive
review of kinematic studies at high redshift.
The origin and ultimate fate of the clumps in high redshift galaxies
is a matter of some debate. In some recent models of galaxy formation, massive
high-redshift clumps are shown to spiral inward due to dynamical
friction and coalesce into
the precursors of local thick disks and galactic bulges
\citep{noguchi99,immeli04,genzel08,dekel09a,cever10,bour14}.
Alternatively it has been suggested that star formation feedback in the
form of stellar winds and supernovae will cause
clumps to be disrupted before migrating to the proto-galactic
center \citep{murray10,genel12}. These feedback mechanisms, however, are not well
constrained by current observations. In these simulations, the
strength and efficiency of the feedback is known to have significant effects on the evolution
of simulated high-redshift galaxies \citep{mandel13}. Recent observations of
star-forming clumps in high-redshift galaxies have estimated
clump lifetimes ranging from 10 to 200 Myr
\citep{elme09,genzel11,newman12,wuyts12}.
At high redshift, detailed studies of individual clumpy
galaxies have been primarily based on observations of ionized gas or
broad stellar analysis based on infrared images \citep{wuyts12}. Stellar kinematics
and ages, which must be measured from absorption features, are too
observationally expensive, even using current state of the art
facilities. Such observations, however, could be key to distinguishing
between models involving clump migration and coalescence from extreme
feedback models in which clumps are rapidly dissolved.
If the large velocity dispersions observed from
H$\alpha$ emission are the result of disruptive feedback, we would
expect to measure stellar velocity
dispersions smaller than those observed for the ionized gas. This would
indicate a thick gaseous disk, which has been
inflated by strong winds originating from an underlying thinner disk of stars. On the
other hand, a key prediction of the turbulent, clumpy disk model is
$\sigma_{*}=\sigma_{gas}$ which
suggests that the stars are formed from an already turbulent
medium.
Accounting for this initial turbulence may require external
sources of gas \citep[e.g., cold accretion or
galaxy
interactions,][]{keres05,bourn09a,dekel09a,vandevoort11}. These
external sources of gas may drive turbulence directly or through instabilities commonly associated with gas rich
disks \citep{dekel09a,forbes13,bour14}.
As of yet, there is no clear consensus on the true fate of giant
star-forming clumps, however the above two scenarios are currently the
most popular. We note here that in HII regions in the Milky Way,
velocity dispersions of the ionized gas and associated young O, B and
A stars ($\sim$5-10 km s$^{-1}$) are found to be lower than
those of the stellar thin disk ($\sim$20 km s$^{-1}$), with the
largest values found for the oldest stars \citep[stellar thick disk,
$\sim$40 km s$^{-1}$,][]{vdkAA11,pase12}.
While there has been a significant effort to distinguish between
clump migration and feedback dominated disk formation models,
observing the stellar kinematics at high redshift has not been
possible and thus we turn to analogs that we can observed locally. It
is important for analogs for this purpose to have high star-formation
rates, gas
kinematics consistent with turbulent rotating disks, large gas fractions, and clumpy gas
morphologies in order to match key features of high-redshift clumpy disks.
Studies of low-redshift analogs such as these provide a much
greater level of detail and can be used to quantify the effects of
resolution and sensitivity on high redshift IFS
observations \citep{gonc10,arribas14}. In previous work \citep{green10,green13} we have found a
sample of low-redshift (0.07 $<$ $z$ $<$ 0.14) galaxies with SFRs and
kinematics well matched to high-redshift clumpy galaxies. A subsample
of these have also been shown from observations with the Plateau de
Bure Interferometer to host gas fractions of $\sim$0.4 (Fisher et
al. submitted).
\begin{table*}
\caption{Physical Properties}
\begin{tabular}{ l c c c c c c c c c c c c c }
\hline\hline
ID & \textit{z} & L(H$\alpha$)$^{1}$ &
SFR$_{H\alpha}^{2}$ & $\mathcal{M}_{*}^{3}$ &
$\sigma_{m,SPIRAL}^{4}$ &
$\mathcal{M}_{gas}^{5}$ & b/a$^{6}$ & $i^{7}$ &
$h^{8}$ &
$n_{b}^{9}$ &
$h_{b}^{10}$\\
& & (log erg s$^{-1}$) & (M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$) & ($10^{9}$
M$_{\odot}$) & (km s$^{-1}$) & ($10^{9}$
M$_{\odot}$) & & (degrees) & kpc & & kpc \\
\hline
G 4-1 & 0.129 & 42.36 & 41.61 & 64.74 & 50.2 & 43.68
& 0.85 & 32.1 & 2.63 & 0.4$\pm$0.6 & 0.2$\pm$0.2
\\
G 20-2 & 0.141 & 42.26 & 17.27 & 21.56 & 44.9 &
19.12 & 0.88 & 28.6 & 2.75 & 0.5$\pm$0.1 & 0.52$\pm$0.06
\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\raggedright
$^{1}$The H$\alpha$
luminosity as measured by previous IFS observations
\citep{green13}\\
$^{2}$The star formation rate measured from
previous IFS observations \citep{green13}\\
$^{3}$The
stellar mass reproduced from \citet{kauf03b} scaled by 0.88 to
convert from their \citet{kroupa01} initial-mass function to that
of \citet{chab03}\\
$^{4}$Flux weighted gas velocity dispersion
from previous IFS observations taken using the SPIRAL IFS\\
$^{5}$Molecular gas mass inferred from the
Kennicut-Schmidt relation \citep{green13}\\
$^{6}$axis ratio
from 2D surface brightness fitting \citep[GALFIT,][]{peng02} of
GMOS continuum maps\\
$^{7}$Inclination calculated from
axis ratios using the standard equation\\
$^{8}$scale radius measured from exponential fits to combined
HST, SDSS, and GMOS data (Section \ref{section:emmap})\\
$^{9}$S\'{e}rsic index of bulge from fits shown in Figure
\ref{figure:expprof}\\
$^{10}$scale radius of bulge from fits shown in Figure \ref{figure:expprof}
\label{table:physparam}
\end{table*}
In this paper we examine stellar and ionized gas
morphologies of two $z\sim0.1$ disk
galaxies which are found to exhibit both ordered rotation and
turbulent ionized gas from previous IFS observations \citep{green13}.
Observations considered here are higher in both signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and spatial resolution
than previous IFS observations of \citet{green13} allowing us to perform
far more detailed morphological and kinematic analysis. We compare
this with
previous IFS observations in order to understand the effects of sensitivity and
resolution on the results of \citep{green13}. Finally, we compare the
resolved stellar and ionized gas kinematics of these galaxies in order to understand the sources of turbulence in young galactic disks.
This paper is laid out as follows: In Section \ref{section:data} we
describe our sample and the observations performed for this study, in Section
\ref{section:analysis} we describe our analysis methodology and
present the results, in Section \ref{section:discussion} we discuss
the implications of our results, and we provide a brief summary in
Section \ref{section:summary}. Throughout this work, we adopt a flat
cosmology with $H_{0}=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and
$\Omega_{M}=0.3$. This results in
a comoving line of sight distance of 533 and 578 Mpc and a spatial
scale of 2.29 kpc/'' and 2.46 kpc/'' for galaxies G 4-1 and G 20-2
respectively.
\section{Sample Selection and Observations}\label{section:data}
\subsection{{\normalfont DYNAMO} Sample}
Recently, \citet{green10} identified a sample
of low-redshift ($z\simeq.05-0.1$) star-forming galaxies, which are
possible analogs to high redshift clumpy
galaxies. Subsamples of these galaxies have now received extensive multiwavelength
observations as part of the DYnamics of Newly Assembled Massive Objects
(DYNAMO) project. We briefly outline the DYNAMO selection here, however
for full sample-selection details see \citet{green13}.
All DYNAMO galaxies have been classified as star forming in the
MPA-JHU Value Added Catalog of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
\citep[SDSS, ][]{york00}. Galaxies hosting active galactic nuclei (AGN)
have been excluded based on their position in the \citet*[BPT,][]{baldw81} diagram. The DYNAMO sample includes 67 galaxies with stellar
masses ranging from $1.09$ to $65.0$ $\times$ $10^{9}$ M$_{\odot}$ and
star-formation rates (SFRs, inferred from H$\alpha$ luminosity of 0.2
to 56.6 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) covering
typical values found on the main sequence of star formation as well as
extremely star-forming galaxies. High H$\alpha$ luminosity galaxies ($>$
$10^{41.5}$ ergs s$^{-1}$) are of
particular interest as possible analogs to high-redshift, clumpy
galaxies. At low redshift however, they are quite rare (the most
likely analogs constitute the upper 95th percentile in H$\alpha$ flux
in SDSS DR4).
DYNAMO galaxies were observed using the
AAOmega-SPIRAL and Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) IFS (0$\farcs$7 and
1$\farcs$0 spatial sampling respectively with typical seeing of 1$\farcs$0-1$\farcs$5).
Around one-half of DYNAMO galaxies exhibit regular, rotation-like
symmetry. This is comparable to studies at high redshift, such as the
SINS survey, in which roughly one-third are classified as rotators, while the
remainder are either compact, dispersion-dominated systems or mergers
\citep{forster09}. Their properties suggest that highly star-forming, disk-like
galaxies in DYNAMO represent a rare, local sample of young, late-type
systems, which are in an evolutionary state more common at high
redshift ($z\geq1$).
\subsection{Absorption Line Subsample}
In this paper we focus on two DYNAMO galaxies with
smooth rotation and large velocity dispersions, which are
similar to star-forming disk galaxies seen at high redshift.
Developing accurate dynamical models of these galaxies necessitates
the study of their stellar kinematics. This requires observations of stellar
absorption lines with spectral resolutions of $\simeq$20 km
s$^{-1}$ or better, implying significantly longer exposure times than
needed for ionized gas kinematics. Studies such as these are currently not
possible at high redshift using existing facilities due to the
prohibitively long exposure times required.
In addition to long exposure times, we also obtain higher spatial
resolution than \citet{green13} to allow for studies of effects such
as beam smearing. Here we present two
galaxies from \citet{green13} which were observed using IFS at the Gemini
Observatory (programs GS-2012B-Q-88 and GN-2012B-Q-130).
These galaxies were selected based on their disk-like
kinematics and turbulent ionized gas from previous IFS observations
\citep{green13}. The physical properties of these galaxies
(DYNAMO ID's G 4-1 and G 20-2) are summarized in Table \ref{table:physparam}.
\subsection{Observations and Data Reduction}\label{section:dr}
Observations for this study were performed using the
Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph \citep[GMOS,][]{hook04} in the IFS
mode \citep{alling02}. In this configuration, the
GMOS field of view is comprised of 750 hexagonal fibers, each having a
projected diameter of $0\farcs2$. Of these, 500 fibers are used for target
observations and are arranged in a rectangular
field of view covering $3\farcs5$ $\times$ $5\farcs0$. The remaining 250 fibers are used for
dedicated sky observations taken $1\farcm0$ from the science position. The
detector is made up of three $2048\times4069$ CCD chips separated by
$\sim$0.5 mm gaps.
Observations presented here were performed at the Gemini
South Telescope in October 2011 and January 2012. The
B1200 grating was used which is the highest resolution grating
available (R$\simeq$5400 at the observed wavelengths), giving a dispersion of 0.24 \AA\ per pixel. The
average seeing was measured from stars in our acquisition images using the IRAF
task \textit{psfmeasure} and was found to be $0\farcs5$ (a factor of 3 better
than SPIRAL and WiFeS observations). This corresponds to a physical
distance of 1.15 and 1.23 kpc at the redshifts of G 4-1 and G 20-2
respectively. This is comparable to the SINS-AO sample which has a
typical spatial resolution of 1.6 kpc. Each object was observed at two
positions to maximize the spatial coverage. Exposures in each position were
dithered spatially as well as spectrally, the latter being achieved by
slightly adjusting the grating tilt-angle.
The data was reduced using the Gemini IRAF software package
\citep[version 1.9,][]{turner06},
which includes bias subtraction, flat-field correction, fiber tracing
and extraction, wavelength calibration, and sky subtraction. Motivated
by previous studies using similar data \citep{westm07,liu13a}, we created a custom reduction
pipeline that replaces the cosmic ray rejection included in the
standard Gemini-GMOS reduction with the Laplacian edge-detection
algorithm L.A.Cosmic \citep{vandokk01}. This greatly improves the
detection and removal of cosmic rays. This step was performed between
bias subtraction and fiber extraction.
The data-reduction
process produced an image referred to as a row-stacked spectra (RSS), in which each pixel row
corresponds to the spectrum in a single fiber. The RSS images were then
resampled by linearly interpolating from the center positions of the
hexagonal fibers to create 3D data cubes with $0\farcs1$ square
pixels. Finally, the individual cubes from each exposure were
spectrally resampled onto the same scale. This is necessary due to a
slight non-uniformity in $\Delta\lambda$ between exposures (which is
attributed to the spectral dithering). The data cubes were then
coadded using a custom IDL script.
We find a number of clear features in our reduced data cubes.
The spectral range of the final coadded data cubes varies slightly
between our objects, but in the rest-frame of each galaxy the coverage
is the same (by design). For each of our objects, the sampled
rest-frame wavelengths extend from roughly 4000 \AA\ to 5350 \AA. This
wavelength range allows us to measure ionized-gas kinematics using
three Balmer lines (H$\beta\lambda$4861 \AA, H$\gamma\lambda$4340 \AA,
and H$\delta\lambda$4102 \AA) and the [OIII]
doublet at 5007 \AA. Stellar-kinematics measurements are
most strongly constrained by absorption associated with the
same three Balmer transitions seen in emission but some constraint is
also provided by a variety of iron absorption lines throughout
this spectral range.
In Section \ref{section:emmap} we compare morphologies from GMOS IFS
to Hubble Space Telescope (HST) FR647M (Proposal ID 12977, PI Damjanov) imaging in which clumps are well resolved. Our HST observations
include continuum and H$\alpha$ imaging. A full description of this
data will be included in future work (Fisher et al. in prep). This data
illustrates the importance of fully resolving clumps, allowing us to
make robust estimates of clump properties such as size and H$\alpha$
luminosity as well as giving a more reliable measure of clump numbers in our
galaxies.
\section{Analysis and Results}\label{section:analysis}
\subsection{Mapping Emission: Clumps}\label{section:emmap}
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/cfin_2.eps}
\vspace{0pt}
\caption{False color images of our disk galaxies. Red corresponds
to the median continuum level (rest frame B band) while green and blue show the peak
flux of the H$\beta$ and [OIII] (5007 \AA) emission lines
respectively. The color scaling is not the same
between components, but is chosen to highlight substructure of our
disk galaxies. The peak of the continuum emission is marked by a
dashed circle with a diameter equivalent to the average seeing of
our observations ($\sim$0$\farcs$5$\simeq$ 1.1 kpc at z$=0.14$). In
both galaxies the continuum peak location is coincident with the
kinematic center (see Figure \ref{figure:gaskine}). Both
galaxies exhibit multiple large clumps of gas
which are offset from the central continuum clump by a distance
which is approximately equal to the seeing of our observations. The locations of the clumps are
marked with white arrows. We note the irregularities in
the central regions of G 20-2 which are due to dead fibers in the detector obscuring the
central region in multiple exposures. Overplotted are the
footprints of Figure \ref{figure:gaskine} in white which indicate
the area over which we can reliably extract ionized gas kinematics
from our datacubes.}\label{figure:clumps}
\end{figure*}
We use relative
emission-line and continuum strengths to map their baryonic content in order to better understand the structure of our galaxies in comparison with high-redshift clumpy disks.
Figure \ref{figure:clumps} shows false color images of our
galaxies. Red corresponds to the median continuum
value in each spaxel in the restframe wavelength range of $\sim$3900-4200
\AA, which traces the stellar-mass component. We achieve a continuum
signal to noise ratio of $\sim$15 and $\sim$21 in the
central regions of G 4-1 and G 20-2 respectively. The
ionized gas is traced in green and blue, indicating the peak value of
the H$\beta$ and [OIII] emission lines, respectively. The scaling of
each component was chosen to best
illustrate the clumpy substructure of our disk galaxies. The white
solid lines correspond to the spatial extent over which we were able to
extract information on ionized gas kinematics. Note the
irregularity in the central regions of G 20-2 are due to dead
fibers in the instrument. Our spatial dithers of 0$\farcs$25 were not
sufficiently large relative to our average seeing ($\sim$0$\farcs$5) to remove this
effect. These dead fibers cause problems
matching the flux between exposures, but do not affect line-profile
shapes and thus will not change our conclusions based on kinematics as
these do not depend on
accurate fluxes.
In both galaxies we observe a single, centrally located peak in
continuum emission, which corresponds spatially with both a peak seen in
\textit{i}-band imaging from SDSS as well as the galaxies' kinematic
centers (see Figures \ref{figure:gaskine} and
\ref{figure:sk202}). We indicate these locations with white dashed circles in Figure
\ref{figure:clumps}, with diameters equivalent to the seeing of our
observations ($\sim$0$\farcs$5, equivalent to 1.15 and 1.23 kpc for G~4-1 and G~20-2 respectively). We also observe multiple peaks in emission-line strength, which are offset
from the continuum peak. We indicate these in Figure \ref{figure:clumps} by
white arrows. The offsets between the continuum peak and emission line
clumps are between 1 and 2 kpc, which is resolved by the seeing of our
observations.
Figure \ref{figure:HST} shows continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ maps from
HST with
0$\farcs$05 pixel scale. HST resolution of 0$\farcs$1
corresponds to a physical distance of 229 pc and 246 pc at the redshifts
of G~4-1 and G~20-2 respectively. We identify a number of clumps in the
HST H$\alpha$ maps through visual inspection. These clumps range in luminosity from 10$^{40}$ to
10$^{42}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$ indicating SFRs of $\sim$1-10 M$_{\odot}$
yr$^{-1}$. These numbers are consistent with the properties of clumps
observed in $z\sim$2 disk galaxies \citep{genzel11}. A detailed study
of the clump properties using the HST photometry will be the subject of
future work by the DYNAMO team (Fisher et al. in prep).
Comparing Figures
\ref{figure:clumps} and \ref{figure:HST} we find that clumps in the HST imaging are more
easily distinguished. Some clumps identified from GMOS-IFS
data correspond to single clumps from HST while others are
unresolved collections of multiple clumps. Clump sizes are smaller
than would
be indicated from GMOS-IFS, however, most clumps are well resolved by HST
giving a lower limit to their sizes of 250 pc (HST resolution
at $z=0.13$). This shows that the comparison between our low-redshift
IFS data and high-resolution, space-based imaging will be valuable for
the interpretation of similar studies at high redshift.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/HST_clumps.eps}
\caption{Continuum subtracted H$\alpha$ maps from HST with
0$\farcs$05 pixel scale. HST resolution of 0$\farcs$1
corresponds to a physical distance of 229 pc and 246 pc at the redshift
of G 4-1 and G 20-2 respectively. Comparing with Figure
\ref{figure:clumps} we find that clumps in the HST imaging are more
easily distinguished. While some clumps identified from GMOS-IFS
data are matched to single clumps here, others are found to be
unresolved collections of multiple clumps. While clump sizes are smaller than would
be predicted from GMOS-IFS, most clumps are resolved by HST
providing a lower limit to their sizes of 250 pc. The white
arrows indicate the same clump locations shown in Figure
\ref{figure:clumps}. Comparisons between our low redshift IFS data
and high-resolution, space-based imaging will be valuable for the
interpretation of similar studies at high redshift.
} \label{figure:HST}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/exp_prof.eps}
\caption{Surface brightness profiles of continuum emission for the two
target galaxies, G~04-2 (top) and G~20-2 (bottom). The flux of the
continuum maps of both profiles has been scaled to match that of
SDSS~$i$ band profile. The solid dots
represent isophotes and the red line represent a S\'ersic function bulge plus
exponential disk fit to the surface brightness profile. For each
galaxy there is a ``bulge'' in the surface brightness profile that
is co-located with the rise in velocity dispersion in our kinematic
maps (Figure~\ref{figure:gaskine}). Some galaxy properties from these
fits are included in Table \ref{table:physparam}. \label{figure:expprof}}
\end{figure}
In Figure~\ref{figure:expprof}, we show the surface-brightness profiles
of the star light for both target galaxies. These profiles are composite
surface-brightness profiles of HST FR647M, SDSS $i$ and continuum
emission from our GMOS observations (see
Figure~\ref{figure:clumps}). The surface photometry from each
telescope is scaled and combined using the method of \cite{fisher2008}. This method reduces random
errors (eg.,~sky subtraction) and allows us to probe
surface-brightness profiles to larger radius. The stellar emission is
smooth, and the main body of both
galaxies ($r\ge 1.5$~kpc) are well described by exponential
surface-brightness profiles at large radii, suggesting that these are unperturbed
disks \citep{vdkAA11}. We determine scale lengths of 2.75 and 2.63 kpc
for G 20-2 and G 4-1 respectively, these values are also included in
Table \ref{table:physparam}.
Both galaxies have bulges in their continuum
emission. We indicate our bulge-disk decomposition with red lines. The
bulges in these galaxies
appear to be co-located with rises in the velocity-dispersion maps of
Figure~\ref{figure:gaskine}. The central kinematic component will be
discussed in more detail in Section~\ref{section:globalsigma}.
In Figure \ref{figure:cspecs}, we make a qualitative comparison between
the spectra in different regions. We show two spectra, each
in artificial apertures with diameter equal to $0\farcs5$. The first is centered on the continuum peak and
the second is located at the peak of H$\beta$ flux from our GMOS datacubes. Figure \ref{figure:cspecs} shows a small
section of these spectra centered between H$\delta$ and
H$\gamma$ for galaxy G 20-2 (spectra for G 4-1 are qualitatively very
similar). These spectra have been normalized by the median continuum
value for direct comparison. Although not apparent in Figure
\ref{figure:clumps}, Figure \ref{figure:cspecs} clearly shows that we
observe significant line emission even in the central regions. The one
difference between the two regions is a much higher emission-line
equivalent width in the emission-line region, apparent in the
difference plot (bottom panel of Figure \ref{figure:cspecs}). This is not surprising
as the regions in which the emission lines are strongest are not
coincident with the peak in continuum flux.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/comp.eps}
\vspace{0pt}
\caption{Comparison between spectra observed in the continuum peak
and the brightest H$\beta$ clump of G 20-2, identified from our GMOS
datacubes, summed in a $0\farcs5$
aperture centered
on these regions and normalized by the median continuum
level. Our spectra are characterized by strong emission lines, in
particular [OIII] and Balmer lines, as well as strong Balmer
absorption associated with A-type stars. The top panel shows the continuum peak spectrum in red
over the emission line peak spectrum in black, while the bottom shows the
continuum peak spectrum subtracted from that of the emission line
peak. Here we show a section of our observed spectral
range which includes the H$\gamma$ and H$\delta$ absorption lines,
which (along with H$\beta$) are the strongest we observe. The shape of the Balmer absorption
lines in both are quite similar, suggesting that the underlying
stellar populations in both regions are of comparable age. The major
difference between the spectra is the equivalent width of the
emission lines as seen in the bottom panel. This is
not surprising as the regions in which the emission lines are
strongest are not coincident with the peak in continuum flux.} \label{figure:cspecs}
\end{figure}
The emission-line-region spectrum has a lower S/N ratio due to
the lower continuum surface brightness, but the overall
continuum shape is nearly identical to that of the peak continuum
region. This suggests that the regions in which we can reliably
observe absorption-line profiles host similar aged stellar
populations. This could partially be an
effect of the seeing in which age differences are smeared
out. We also note that it is quite difficult to
probe stellar populations in the regions of maximum H$\beta$
equivalent width (where the average stellar age is likely to be the
lowest) due to the exponentially-dropping continuum surface brightness.
By examining the ionized gas and continuum components of G 4-1 and G
20-2 we provide further evidence that these galaxies are excellent
low-redshift analogs to high-redshift clumpy disks. We find that the
ionized gas is arranged in multiple clumps surrounding a central
continuum peak. We show that clumps are marginally
resolved, but that our 0$\farcs$1 HST imaging will be required to
measure accurate sizes for these clumps. Surface brightness profile
fitting to combined HST, GMOS, and SDSS data shows that both galaxies
are well described by an exponential at large radii with evidence of a
small bulge.\\
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/aper_out.eps}
\caption{Velocity and velocity dispersion measurements of stellar
kinematics for spectra shown in Figure \ref{figure:cspecs} at
each template age (as described in Section
\ref{section:tempage}). Both kinematics measures are
normalized by measurements
made using templates with ages of 500 Myr. We have overplotted a dot-dashed
line on the vertical axis at 1 for reference. We find in the age
range from 60 to 500 Myr (indicated by vertical dot-dashed lines)
measurements of stellar kinematics remain relatively stable. We
have also overplotted the $\chi^{2}$/DOF (not normalized) for each
template and find
that this range also corresponds to the statistically best fitting
templates. We adopt a template age of 500 Myr for fitting stellar
kinematics in this study as this corresponds to the $\chi^{2}$/DOF
closest to 1 for both regions.} \label{figure:agetst}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Matching Templates with Observed Spectra}\label{section:tempage}
We employed the full spectrum
stellar-kinematics fitting program Penalized Pixel-Fitting
\citep[pPXF,][]{cappe04} to measure the velocity and velocity
dispersion of the
stellar populations in our sample. We fit our observations using synthetic galaxy spectra created with the
P\'{E}GASE-HR code \citep{leborg04}. This code uses high-resolution
(R=10,000) stellar spectra from the \'{E}LODIE library \citep{prug01} to
construct an evolutionary sequence of composite spectra based on simple stellar
populations (SSPs) with ages ranging from 10 Myr to
20 Gyr.
We first developed a test to select the P\'{E}GASE template with an SSP age
most similar to our observed spectra.
Selecting a spectral template that is well matched to the observed
spectra is essential in reliably extracting kinematics through full
spectrum fitting. This is because of the wide range of absorption line profiles
associated with different stellar populations. Our test involves Using
pPXF to fit the
representative spectra considered in Section 3.1 (see Figure
\ref{figure:cspecs}) with each P\'{E}GASE-HR template individually while
masking the emission lines. This procedure measures the
velocity, velocity dispersion, and goodness of fit ($\chi^{2}$/DOF) at
each SSP template age. We performed this test on spectra from both
the continuum and emission line peaks to check for any spatial
variation in stellar population age. We then selected the template with
$\chi^{2}$/DOF closest to 1. The results of template selection are
shown in Figure \ref{figure:agetst}. Kinematic values presented have been
normalized by the measurement made using a template age of 500 Myr.
Figure \ref{figure:agetst} shows that there is a range in
template ages between 60 and 500 Myrs in which both the stellar
velocity and velocity dispersion measurements remain relatively
stable. The $\chi^{2}$/DOF values indicate that templates in this age range are
the best fitting from the P\'{E}GASE-HR library (this is also
apparent from visual inspection of individual fits). This is true for
both the continuum and emission line peaks suggesting that there is no
evidence of spatial variations in stellar population ages in our
observations.
We investigated the effects of repeating our stellar kinematics
fitting (results presented in Figure \ref{figure:sk202}) using each
templates in the age range from 60-500 Myr individually.
Selecting templates in the age range of 100-500 Myr returns velocity and
velocity dispersion measurements in agreement with measurements using
a 500 Myr old template within our simulated uncertainties (discussed
in Section \ref{section:uncert}). At younger template ages, the
velocity remains in agreement while the velocity dispersion
measurement increases relative to measurments made using 500 Myr old
templates. This difference increases as template age decreases from a
$\sim$5\% increase in velocity dispersion using a 100 Myr template to
a $\sim$38\% increase from fits performed with a 60 Myr template.
Qualitatively it
is reasonable to expect the continuum emission from these galaxies in
this wavelength regime to
be dominated by young stellar populations because the extreme levels
of line emission are indicative of a recent (and likely ongoing) star formation
activity. A P\'{E}GASE-HR template with an age of 500 Myr is selected
for stellar kinematics measurements throughout the remainder of
this paper. This was chosen as fits using templates aged 500 Myr
display the nearest $\chi^{2}$/DOF value to 1 in both the continuum
and emission line regions for both galaxies.
\subsection{Measuring Kinematics}\label{section:measuringkinematics}
\subsubsection{High Resolution Ionized-Gas Kinematics}\label{section:gkin}
We produced ionized gas velocity and
velocity dispersion maps by fitting a single
Gaussian profile to the H$\beta$ emission line. The velocity and
velocity dispersion are then calculated using the centroid position
and $\sigma_{gas}$ of the model fit. To correct for instrumental broadening,
we subtracted the instrumental line width from the raw measurement in
quadrature: $\sigma_{gas}=\sqrt{\sigma_{obs}^{2}-\sigma_{inst}^{2}}$,
where $\sigma_{obs}$ is the observed velocity dispersion and
$\sigma_{inst}$ his the instrumental broadening measured from our arc
observations to be 24 km s$^{-1}$. Figure \ref{figure:gaskine} shows
the results of this procedure.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/gvmaps.eps}
\caption{Velocity and velocity dispersion maps for the ionized gas
component of our sample measured by fitting a Gaussian profile to
the H$\beta$ emission line. The small white bars
represent a distance of $\sim1.5$ kpc at each galaxy's redshift.
Both galaxies display smoothly varying velocity fields and centrally
peaked velocity dispersions typical of disk galaxies. The velocity
dispersions here are large relative to typical disk galaxies
nearby \citep[5-20 km s$^{-1}$ from DISKMASS, ][]{andersen06} suggesting that the gas disks in these
galaxies are highly turbulent. The black lines
shown in the bottom row mark the boundaries of the ``central
region'' which exhibits increased velocity dispersion. These
regions possibly represent a young galactic bulge while velocity
dispersions in the outer bins are characteristic of a
marginally stable, turbulent disk. We measure a mean ionized gas
velocity dispersion of 36.6 km s$^{-1}$ and 29.8 km s$^{-1}$ for
the outer regions of G 20-2 and G 4-1 respectively. See Section
\ref{section:globalsigma} for further discussion of
global $\sigma$ estimates.}\label{figure:gaskine}
\end{figure}
We employ the Voronoi Binning method
of \citet{cappe03} in
order to extend this analysis to radii beyond which these measurements
from single spaxels are reliable. This technique uses maps of S/N to
ensure that each spatial bin falls above a specified S/N
threshold. For our inputs we use the continuum maps of our galaxies
from Figure \ref{figure:clumps} and a constant noise based on the
variance of our spectra in off target regions. Because the line
emission is significantly stronger than that of the continuum we use a
low S/N threshold of 1.0, however many bins (particularly
those at the center) have S/N much higher than this. We choose to use
continuum S/N rather than emission-line S/N because the clumpy
structure results in oddly shaped bins which distort the kinematic
maps. Our low S/N threshold ensures that within the region in which we
observe clumps, all Voronoi bins contain a single spaxel.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/bscor.eps}
\vspace{0pt}
\caption{Modeling the effects of beam smearing. Plots for each disk
galaxy are shown in a single row. From left to right each row shows
maps of velocity dispersion corrected for instrumental broadening,
a simulated map of the influence of beam smearing (described in
Section \ref{section:beamsmearing}), and velocity dispersion maps
corrected for beam smearing by subtracting the central panel from
the left panel in quadrature. It is seen that the
influence of beam smearing peaks at the centers of our galaxies as
expected. Beam smearing estimates in these regions are 24-36 km
s$^{-1}$ and the peak measured velocity dispersions are $\sim70$ km
s$^{-1}$. The applied correction here is around 4-8 km
s$^{-1}$ showing that even at the centers of our galaxies this is a
minimal effect. In the outer portions of our disks the influence of beam
smearing can effectively be ignored.}\label{figure:bscor}
\end{figure}
We used our kinematics maps to measure global $\sigma$ values which we
compare with previous results.
The ionized-gas-velocity maps we produced from our GMOS observations
extend into the flat portion of the rotation curve (which is shown
later in Section \ref{section:results}) where beam-smearing effects are
minimized. This allows for robust measurements of velocity
dispersion. We took an average value of the outer bins to make an
estimate of the velocity-dispersion value across the disk. We
indicate the bins over which these averages were
taken by black lines in the bottom panel of Figure \ref{figure:gaskine}.
These bins correspond to regions that are a distance equivalent to our
seeing away from the kinematic centers of our galaxies. This results in mean H$\beta$ dispersions of
36.6 km s$^{-1}$ and 29.8 km s$^{-1}$ for G 20-2 and G 4-1,
respectively. We consider these our best estimates of the overall disk
velocity dispersion and compare them with velocity disperions of local
disks in Section \ref{section:gdiscuss}.
We also took a raw averages without excluding central bins to compare with previous work \citep{green13}. This results in values of 43.2 km
s$^{-1}$ and 35.6 km s$^{-1}$. For G 20-2 this is much closer to the
value of 44.9 km s$^{-1}$ found from SPIRAL data, while the
dispersion measured for G 4-1 is significantly lower
($\sigma_{SPIRAL,m}$ = 50.2 km s$^{-1}$).
We performed a test to see if the difference between our GMOS and
SPIRAL results is an effect of spatial resolution.
We resample our GMOS datacubes to the resolution of the previous
SPIRAL observations and follow the same Gaussian fitting procedure
outlined above. We then calculated a flux weighted velocity dispersion
(matching the analysis of \citealp{green13}) for both galaxies
resulting in $\sigma_{m}$ of 45.3 and 38.8 km s$^{-1}$ for G 20-2 and
G 4-1. For G 20-2, $\sigma_{m}$ is well matched to the value calculated from
SPIRAL data, while our measurement for G 4-1 is still 10 km s$^{-1}$
less than previous measurements.
The remaining difference of 10 km s$^{-1}$ between GMOS and SPIRAL
measurements for G 4-1 (as well as the
10-20~km~s$^{-1}$ difference between $\sigma_{m}$ of \citet{green13}
and our mean $\sigma_{gas}$ excluding central bins) can be attributed to a bias of
the previous SPIRAL measurements towards regions of
highest H$\alpha$ flux due to the lower sensitivity of previous
observations. This means that our $\sigma_{m}$ values from SPIRAL observations contain
little or no contribution from dynamically cooler gas at large
radii. Additionally, if the most intense line emission is coincident with the kinematic center
of a galaxy, then our previous measurements will be more strongly
influenced by beam smearing as the central region is where velocity gradients will
be at a maximum. This is the case for galaxy G 4-1 while in G 20-2
the most intense line emission is offset from the kinematic center (see Figures
\ref{figure:clumps} and \ref{figure:gaskine}).
In summary,
discrepancies between $\sigma_{m}$ measurements from SPIRAL and GMOS
can largely be attributed to spatial resolution, sensitivity, and beam
smearing. We note that our GMOS dispersions are consistent with higher resolution
kinematics maps based on Paschen $\alpha$ from adaptive optics
assisted observations using the OH-Suppressing Infrared IFS
(OSIRIS) on Keck (Bassett et al. in prep). A more detailed analysis of global velocity
dispersions can be found in Section \ref{section:globalsigma}.
\subsubsection{Modeling the Effects of Beam Smearing}\label{section:beamsmearing}
While the GMOS observations
presented here benefit from improved spatial resolution, beam smearing
can still play an important role in understanding our kinematic
measurements. \citet{davies11} shows how typical observations of
$z\sim0.1$ galaxies at $\sim$1$\farcs$0 resolution can inflate the
velocity dispersion of average disk galaxies \citep[$\sim10-25$ km
s$^{-1}$,][]{andersen06,martin13} to the large values found here.
Beam smearing affects both the observed velocity and velocity-dispersion
maps due to velocity gradients over individual beams. The end
result is a slight reduction in the slope of rotation curves and an
inflation of velocity-dispersion measurements. This effect is most
pronounced in the central regions of disk galaxies, where velocity
gradients are at a maximum. We can attempt to correct for this by
carefully considering the observed shape of the velocity field as well
as the average seeing of our observations.
We performed a simulation to better understand quantitatively the
effects of beam smearing on our velocity-dispersion measurements.
We first fit a rotating
disk model to the observed ionized gas kinematics, the details of which
can be found in \citet{green13}. We mapped the influence of
beam smearing on these models when subject to conditions
typical of our observations ($\sim0\farcs5$ seeing). This mapping was done by
creating an artificial datacube with two spatial dimensions
and one velocity, with the velocity resolution chosen to
match our observations. The velocity distribution of each
artificial spaxel received a contribution from every other spaxel
weighted by a two dimensional Gaussian function with $\sigma$ equal to
our average seeing. The velocity
distribution was subsequently fit with a Gaussian function and the
$\sigma$ of these fits were taken as the contribution of beam smearing
to our measured velocity dispersions.
We subtracted the produced ``beam smearing maps'' in quadrature from the
observed velocity-dispersion maps to correct for the beam-smearing
effect in our velocity dispersion maps \citep{gneru11,epinat12}. Maps of our modeled beam smearing
and the corrected velocity dispersion are shown in
Figure \ref{figure:bscor}. From the central figure in each row it is
seen that the estimated influence of beam smearing peaks as expected
in the central region, where the velocity gradient is at a
maximum. Typical values in the central regions of our beam-smearing maps are 24-30 km s$^{-1}$, which is low
relative to measured velocity dispersions in the same regions (55-80
km s$^{-1}$).
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/skfin2.eps}
\vspace{0pt}
\caption{Results of pPXF measurements of stellar kinematics in our
sample. In order to obtain reliable measurements in the faint
outskirts of these galaxies, the Voronoi Tessellated binning method
was employed. The gas velocity was remeasured in each bin for
direct comparison. White bars in each panel correspond to a
distance of $\sim1.5$ kpc at the redshift of our
galaxies. The velocity maps are plotted over the footprint of the
gas only measurements for comparison. The gas and stars in these
galaxies appear to be closely kinematically coupled, both are arranged in
a smoothly rotating disk with a large velocity dispersion. We
calculate a mean stellar velocity dispersion value for both the gas and
stars, excluding central regions (indicated by black lines in the
velocity dispersion maps) for use in simple disk models. This
results in values of
$\sigma_{d,*}=52.8$ for G 20-2 and $\sigma_{d,*}=47.5$ for G
4-1. See Section \ref{section:globalsigma} for further discussion
of global sigma values} \label{figure:sk202}
\end{figure*}
We also compared the central beam-smearing estimates with a simple analytic
calculation. We assumed a linear velocity gradient and constant
intensity, which is a reasonable approximation for the central regions
of smoothly rotating disks. We estimated a central velocity gradient
from Figure \ref{figure:gaskine} of 5-6 km s$^{-1}$ pixel$^{-1}$ by
measuring the difference in velocity between the two flat portions of
the rotation curves and dividing by the separation between these two
portions in pixels. The contribution of beam smearing was then estimated as
\begin{equation}\label{bsanal}
\sigma_{BS} \approx \frac{dV}{d\theta}\sigma_{\theta},
\end{equation}
where $d\theta$ is a distance corresponding to one pixel and $\sigma_{\theta}$ is the
seeing of our observations in pixels ($\sim$5 pixels). This results in
a value of 25-30 km s$^{-1}$, consistent with the modeled values.
When the modeled beam-smearing contribution is subtracted in
quadrature from the observed velocity dispersion in
the regions of maximum velocity dispersion (55-80 km s$^{-1}$), the
correction is only 4-8 km s$^{-1}$, comparable to our errors in
stellar-kinematics measurements (see Section \ref{section:uncert}). This
small correction suggests that the increased velocity dispersion in the
central regions are real and a possible signature of a small bulge or
pseudobulge (see Section \ref{section:clumpfate} for discussion).
Furthermore, in regions further than our seeing distance from
the central regions, beam smearing can effectively be ignored.
\subsubsection{Mapping Stellar Kinematics}\label{section:skin}
In this section, we map the stellar kinematics of our galaxies and
compare them directly to those of the ionized gas. We again employed the Voronoi Binning method
of \citet{cappe03} to ensure that our measurements are reliable even in the faint
outskirts of our galaxies. We used the same setup as in
Section \ref{section:gkin}, but with a larger S/N
threshold of 10. We used a larger S/N threshold here because the absorption signal
is much weaker than the emission line strength.
We developed a custom IDL wrapper for pPXF which simultaneously fits for
stellar and emission-line kinematics. This allows us to directly compare stellar and gas
kinematics on a bin-by-bin basis. We first fitted the spectrum with pPXF using
emission-line masking and subtracted the resulting fit. The result
is a spectrum composed only of emission lines. Next, we
fit the emission lines using a single Gaussian profile. From
the centroid position and $\sigma$ of these fits we again measured the
velocity and velocity dispersion of the ionized gas in our galaxies.
We plot the results of our stellar-kinematics fitting procedure in
Figure \ref{figure:sk202}. For each galaxy, the velocity
maps of the ionized gas and stars, as well as the subtracted
residual of $v_{gas}-v_{*}$, are shown in the top row. Similarly,
the bottom row shows the maps of velocity dispersion, but this time
showing the absolute difference: $|\sigma_{gas}-\sigma_{*} |$. This
allows us to plot using the same color bar used for the
velocity-dispersion maps, however we note that in most bins the
stellar velocity disperions is larger than that of the gas (see Figure
\ref{figure:rotcurves}). Also
depicted in the top row of Figure \ref{figure:sk202} as solid white lines are the
footprints of the gas only kinematics measurements from Figure
\ref{figure:gaskine} for comparison. These footprints indicate the
extent to which we can reliably measure ionized gas kinematics. Solid
black lines in the bottom
row differentiate bins that are considered part of the central region and
those that are part of the outer disk. Global $\sigma$ values are
calculated for these regions and discussed in Section
\ref{section:globalsigma}.
\subsubsection{Stellar Kinematics Uncertainties}\label{section:uncert}
We next consider if the residual-kinematic maps (right columns for
both galaxies in Figure \ref{figure:sk202}) are significant or if they
are within our measurement uncertainties.
Following the procedure suggested by
\citet{cappe04}, we performed a Monte Carlo simulation of our absorption fitting
routine. This simulation was done by first subtracting the best-fit spectrum
output by pPXF, from the original spectrum, to produce a
residual spectrum. The residual spectrum was then randomized in wavelength (using the IDL task SHUFFLE), and added to the best
fit in order to simulate an idealized spectrum with noise
characteristic of our observations. We chose to add the shuffled
residual to the model rather than the original spectrum as the latter
tends to produce spectra which are noisier than the original, thus
overestimating the uncertainty. Some areas of the
spectra display unusually large residuals due to the chip
gaps in the detector (which are masked out in the fitting procedure).
To account for these large deviations we replace values in
masked regions by random values based on the standard deviation of the
unmasked regions of the residual spectrum.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/uncmapsfin.eps}
\vspace{0pt}
\caption{To estimate the uncertainties of our pPXF measurements, we perform
a Monte Carlo simulation as suggested by \citet{cappe04}. Briefly
the residual of our stellar kinematics fits are shuffled and added
to the best fit model. We then refit this spectrum with the
original model in an attempt to recover the known input
kinematics. This process is repeated 1000 times for each spatial
bin and the uncertainties are taken as the standard deviation of
these measurements. Due to the high resolution of our spectra and
the sensitivity of our observations, we are able to make
measurements of stellar kinematics accurate to $5-8$ km s$^{-1}$ in
most bins.} \label{figure:uncmaps}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}
\caption{Stellar Kinematics Uncertainties}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ l c c }
\hline
& Velocity Uncertainty & $\sigma$ Uncertainty \\
& $\pm$ km s$^{-1}$ & $\pm$ km s$^{-1}$ \\
\hline
G 4-1 center & 4.7 & 5.2\\
G4-1 disk & 6.7 & 7.9\\
G 20-2 center & 5.0 & 5.9\\
G 20-2 disk & 6.7 & 8.2 \\
\hline \\
\end{tabular}\label{table:uncert}
\end{table}
We produced 1000 simulated spectra
for each spatial bin and refit each of them using the same pPXF
setup. We then computed the standard deviations of the sample of
simulated fit values (using the square root of the IDL VARIANCE task).
These values were taken as our uncertainties in each bin.
Figure \ref{figure:uncmaps} shows the maps
of our uncertainties in velocity and velocity dispersion for G 20-2
and G 4-1.
Our measurements are most accurate in the centers of our galaxies,
where the continuum strength is the highest. The centers are
also the areas in which the effects of beam smearing are the
greatest.
Due to the sensitivity and high spectral resolution of our observations,
even measurements of the stellar kinematics made at the largest radii
are quite robust.
We estimate the measurement uncertainty of our pPXF procedure by
taking two mean values for both stellar velocity and velocity
dispersion. One measurement in the central regions and one in the
outer bins. Central and outer regions are defined as in Section
\ref{section:skin} and Figure \ref{figure:sk202}. These values are presented in Table
\ref{table:uncert}. Kinematics measurements in most bins are known within
$\pm8$ km s$^{-1}$ based on our Monte Carlo simulation.
Comparing
Figures \ref{figure:sk202} and \ref{figure:uncmaps} one can see that
kinematics for these two components match quite closely. The mean
values of $|v_{gas}-v_{*}|$ and $|\sigma_{gas}-\sigma_{*} |$ are 15.8
and 8.4 km s$^{-1}$ for G 20-2 and 8.9 and 8.3 km s$^{-1}$ for G 4-1
mostly consistent with our estimated stellar kinematics
uncertainties. The large velocity difference in G 20-2 between stars
and gas may be attributed to asymmetric drift. This is a phenomenon
observed in many late-type galaxies in which the stellar disk lags
behind the gas disk due to extra support from random motions
\citep[][some evidence for this can be seen in
Figure~\ref{figure:rotcurves}]{golu13}.
We
find that the ionized gas and stellar kinematics of these galaxies are closely
coupled and characterized by smooth rotation and large,
centrally peaked velocity dispersions. It is interesting that these
two components are so well matched kinematically while their morphologies
(shown in Figure \ref{figure:clumps}) appear very different.
\subsection{Global Velocity Dispersion
Estimates}\label{section:globalsigma}
\begin{table}
\caption{Global Beam-Smearing Corrected $\sigma$ Values}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ c c c c c c c c }
\hline\hline
Galaxy & $\sigma_{m,\textrm{SPIRAL}}^{1}$ &
$\sigma_{c,gas}^{2}$ &
$\sigma_{c,*}^{3}$ &
$\sigma_{d,gas}^{4}$ &
$\sigma_{d,*}^{5}$ & \\
& km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & km
s$^{-1}$\\
\hline
G 4-1 & 50 & 44 & 58$\pm$5 & 30 & 48$\pm$8 \\
G 20-2 & 45 & 49 & 66$\pm$6 & 37 & 53$\pm$8 \\
\hline \\
\end{tabular} \\
\raggedright
$^{1}$Flux-weighted mean
ionized-gas velocity dispersion measured from H$\alpha$ emission
lines \citep{green13}\\
$^{2}$Unweighted-mean ionized-gas velocity
dispersion of central regions measured from H$\beta$ emission observed with
GMOS-IFS\\
$^{3}$Unweighted-mean stellar velocity
dispersion of central regions from pPXF fits to GMOS-IFS data\\
$^{4}$Unweighted-mean ionized-gas velocity
dispersion of disk regions measured from H$\beta$ emission observed with
GMOS-IFS\\
$^{5}$Unweighted-mean stellar velocity
dispersion of disk regions from pPXF fits to GMOS-IFS data\\
\label{table:centralkine}
\end{table}
We find that our disk galaxies exhibit enhanced
velocity dispersions in their central regions, which can not entirely
be attributed to the effects of beam smearing. Regions of enhanced
velocity dispersion correspond to a central excess in stellar light
compared with a single exponential profile
(see Figure~\ref{figure:expprof}). This
is possible evidence for a galactic bulge and thus we calculated two
average velocity disperions for both the stellar and ionized gas
components: one mean in the central regions ($\sigma_{c}$) and one in
the outer regions ($\sigma_{d}$). These two values correspond to a
``bulge'' and ``disk'' mean $\sigma$ respectively.
Different regions for calculating mean $\sigma$ values are indicated in the velocity dispersion maps of Figures
\ref{figure:gaskine} and \ref{figure:sk202} by solid black lines. We
also calculated the average influence of beam smearing in the central
and outer regions. This was done by taking an average of pixels from
our beam-smearing maps (Figure \ref{figure:bscor}) in each of the
Voronoi Bins of Figures \ref{figure:gaskine} and
\ref{figure:sk202}. We then average these binned-beam-smearing values
in the same way as was done for the velocity-dispersion measurements.
A correction is then applied to the respective mean
velocity-dispersion values as $\left(\sigma_{mean}^2 - \sigma_{BS}^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}$.
We first consider the mean velocity-dispersion values of the central bins,
$\sigma_{c}$. The resulting values are shown in Table
\ref{table:centralkine}. The measurements made are the mean
ionized-gas velocity dispersion from gas-only measurements
($\sigma_{c,gas}$) and the mean stellar
velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{c,*}$). We also include for comparison
$\sigma_{m,\textrm{SPIRAL}}$ which is the flux weighted mean ionized
gas velocity dispersion from \citet{green13}. In both
galaxies, the values of $\sigma_{c,*}$ are larger than
$\sigma_{c,gas}$. The differences are 17.7 and 14.5 km s$^{-1}$ for G
20-2 and G 4-1, respectively. This can be attributed
to the fact that in our simple mean each Voronoi bin is given the same
weight. Because our data cubes are more coarsely
binned during our pPXF procedure, the outer regions (where velocity
dispersion are lowest) are given less weight per unit area
in $\sigma_{c,*}$ than in $\sigma_{c,gas}$. When Voronoi bins
are also weighted by bin size, this difference is reduced by
half.
We next make similar measurements considering the outer disk regions
of $\sigma_{d,gas}$ and $\sigma_{d,*}$. These
results are shown in Table \ref{table:centralkine}.
Similar to the central regions, our
measurements of $\sigma_{d,*}$ are larger than $\sigma_{d,gas}$ by
16.2 and 17.7 km s$^{-1}$ for G 20-2 and G 4-1, respectively.
The difference in this case is likely due to the reduced
spatial coverage of our pPXF kinematics (see Figure
\ref{figure:sk202}) which are restricted to the largest $\sigma$
regions of the galactic disks.
\subsection{Rotation Curves}\label{section:rcurves}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\begin{subfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./figures/G202_rc.pdf}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{./figures/G41_rc.pdf}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Galaxy rotation curves and $\sigma$
profiles averaged in bins of 300 pc. Velocities are plotted
with a correction for angular
dependence using $V(r,\phi)=V(r)\cos(\phi)\sin(i)$ where $\phi$ is the
angle between a given spatial location and the semimajor axis with
the center of the galaxy as the vertex and i is the galaxy
inclination. For $\sigma$ we have
subtracted our beam smearing estimate from the observed
velocity dispersion in quadrature on a bin by bin basis. We
overplot values for the
emission line kinematics (black circles) and stellar
kinematics (red error bars) extracted during our pPXF
procedure. For the
emission line measurement, we probe well into the flat
portion of the rotation curve where the effects of beam
smearing are negligible while stellar kinematics
measurements just reach this region. The size of the error
bars plotted for our stellar kinematics indicate the average
of our simulated uncertainties in each bin.}\label{figure:rotcurves}
\end{figure*}
The main result of this study is that in both galaxies,
\textit{the stellar kinematics closely mirror those of the ionized gas}. This
is shown again in Figure \ref{figure:rotcurves} where we plot our kinematics
measurements versus distance to the galactic center. In the top panels we
have computed $V(r)$ in each spatial bin using
$V(r,\phi)=V(r)\cos(\theta)sin(i)$ \citep{warner73} where $\theta$ is the azimuthal
angle in the galactic plane measured from the kinematic major axis and
$i$ is the inclination. In the bottom panels we plot velocity
dispersions after correcting for beam smearing by subtracting our
simulated beam smearing contribution (see
Section~\ref{section:beamsmearing}) from the measured velocity
dispersion in quadrature on a bin-by-bin basis.
We estimated the inclinations of our galaxies, $i$, from axis ratios
determined using GALFIT \citep{peng02}. We performed this fit on
continuum images created from our data cubes but taking the median
value of each spaxel. The axis ratios calculated
using GALFIT are sensitive to the choice of point-spread function (PSF),
however there is little (if any) precedent for using GALFIT with IFS
data. We require a PSF which has been observed in a similar manner as
our galaxies. To achieve this we observed an A-type star with GMOS in
IFS mode with the spectral range chosen to match the rest frame
wavelengths of our galaxy observations. This data was reduced in the
same manner as described in Section \ref{section:dr}. We created a
median image of this star from the reduced data cube and used this as
our PSF while fitting with GALFIT. We consider this the best possible method
for defining the IFS response to a point source. We
report the axis ratios (b/a) we recover, as well as inclinations
calculated using the standard equation in Table \ref{table:physparam}.
Figure \ref{figure:rotcurves} shows the computed rotation curves and
velocity dispersion profiles for our galaxies. Both the ionized-gas
(open circles) and stellar (red error bars) kinematics are measured
out to the flat portion of the rotation curves of these galaxies. This
allows us to make robust estimates of global velocity dispersions. In
all bins, the velocity curves of both components are well
matched with small differences likely due to differences in binning
between our gas and stellar kinematics fitting procedures. Large differences
seen in the rotation curves of G 20-2 are possible indications of
asymmetric drift. Stellar velocity dispersions in most bins agree with
the ionized gas velocity dispersions within our
simulated uncertainties (indicated by the size of the error bars) or
are found to be slightly higher. This suggests that the observed
turbulence in the ionized gas in DYNAMO galaxies is not primarily due
to star-formation feedback. If the turbulence was due to feedback,
stellar velocity dispersion measurements would be \textit{lower} than
that of the gas.
\subsection{Results Summary}\label{section:results}
The optical spectra of these galaxies are dominated by young
stellar populations. Figure \ref{figure:cspecs} shows that
the absorption spectrum is dominated by Balmer lines. These lines are
strongest in
B and A type stars which dominate optical spectra of SSP's at ages
younger than 1 Gyr. This is consistent with the young ages (500 Myr)
of templates selected for our stellar kinematics fitting. These
young ages, along with the dynamically hot kinematics, high rates of
star formation \citep{green13}, and large gas fractions (Fisher et al.
submitted) are suggestive
of early stages of disk-galaxy evolution. Such an evolutionary state
is more characteristic of star-forming galaxies at high redshift than
star-forming galaxies at $z<1$.
We map the relative strength of emission line and continuum flux
which reveals clumpy substructure which was not resolved in previous
observations (Figure \ref{figure:clumps}). Both galaxies exhibit
multiple regions of high emission-line
equivalent width located 1-2 kpc from a single, centrally located peak
in continuum emission. The discovery of these
clumps lends further
support to the suggestion that these galaxies are low redshift
analogues to clumpy galaxies at $z\sim2$.
We find that the kinematics of the stellar and ionized gas
components of these galaxies are well matched, with large stellar velocity dispersions
similar to ionized gas velocity dispersions found in previous work
\citep{green13}. This is indicative of a
scenario in which the ionized gas turbulence is driven externally
rather than being primarily due to star-formation feedback. This
result is also found in a recent IFS study of galactic winds in local
luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGS/ULIRGS)
\citep{arribas14}. Measuring winds from H$\beta$ using our GMOS
datacubes is inherently difficult due to the complex absorption
profile also associated with this transition. Emission line profiles
of [OIII] (5007 \AA) in galaxy G 20-2 show some evidence for broad
components which could be indicative of star-formation driven winds
expected in such high-SFR systems (see Section \ref{section:clumpfate}
for some discussion). Inclusion of a broad component
however, has a negligible effect on velocity dispersion measurements of
the narrow component when compared to a single component fit.
Therefore not including a broad component in fits presented here will
not affect our conclusions. An
analysis of the broad components of emission lines of DYNAMO galaxies
will be presented in future work based on IFS
observations of Paschen $\alpha$ using Keck OSIRIS.
\section{Discussion}\label{section:discussion}
\subsection{Comparison With Local Disks}\label{section:gdiscuss}
In Figure \ref{figure:loccomp}, we show that our ionized-gas velocity-dispersion measurements are
truly unusual compared to similar measurements of low-redshift late-type
galaxies. We established this difference based on comparison with the
IFS studies from the DiskMass survey of \citet{andersen06},
who examine the H$\alpha$ linewidths of 39 nearby, face-on disks using
the DensePak instrument on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope. We obtained
H$\alpha$-line-width measurements from each fiber from their observations
to compare directly with our H$\beta$ measurements in each of our
spatial bins from Figure \ref{figure:gaskine}. We plot in Figure
\ref{figure:loccomp} the cumulative fractions of velocity dispersion
for the two samples.
It is clear from Figure \ref{figure:loccomp} that the disk
galaxies considered here are outliers relative to local disk
samples. The disk velocity dispersions of $\sim32$ km s$^{-1}$ we measure for
our sample are in the $98^{th}$ percentile of individual fiber
measurements for the sample of \citet{andersen06}. We note, however, that
galaxies in \citet{andersen06} were selected in part for their face-on
inclinations, an orientation which will produce the lowest possible
measurements of velocity dispersion due to a minimal contribution from
velocity dispersions within the plane of the disk. While this may bias their results
to low $\sigma$ measurements, theirs represents the best comparison
sample currently available.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/loccomp.eps}
\caption{Cumulative fraction in $\sigma$ for each fiber from
\citet{andersen06} compared with each value from outer spatial bins
indicated in
Figure \ref{figure:gaskine} for both galaxies considered here. It is clear that values measured for G
20-2 and G 4-1 do not come from the same parent sample as those
measured for local face on spirals. Indeed, the values of
$\sigma_{d,gas}$ measured for these galaxies are in the $98^{th}$
percentile of individual fibers from \citet{andersen06}.} \label{figure:loccomp}
\end{figure}
We also compare with the recent IFS studies of \citet{bello13}
and \citet{arribas14} who observe ionized gas kinematics of
LIRGS/ULIRGS at redshifts comparable to those of the
DYNAMO sample. Galaxies such as these represent the most extremely
star-forming local galaxies, and many galaxies in their sample have SFRs
comparable to those of G 4-1 and G 20-2. Similar to the results presented here,
\citet{bello13} and \citet{arribas14} find enhanced ionized gas
velocity dispersions relative to average local disk galaxies. At SFRs
in the range observed for G 4-1 and G 20-2 ($\sim$20-40 M$_{\odot}$
yr$^{-1}$), local LIRGS/ULIRGS typically have ionized gas velocity dispersions of
$\sim$60-80 km s$^{-1}$, roughly 30 km s$^{-1}$ higher than
ionized gas velocity dispersions we measure for G 4-1 and G 20-2.
This is likely due to the fact that the LIRG/ULIRG sample studied by
\citet{bello13} and \citet{arribas14} include, in addition to disks, a
significant fraction of interacting systems and mergers. Considering
only a sub-sample of non-interacting, non-AGN disk LIRGs,
\citet{arribas14} find $\sigma\simeq45$ km s$^{-1}$, comparable to the
findings presented here for DYNAMO disks.
\subsection{Stellar Kinematics and Disk Thickness}\label{section:thickness}
Both the ionized-gas and young-stellar components are observed
to have similarly high velocity dispersions \citep[compared to a velocity
dispersion of $\sim$10 km s$^{-1}$ observed for young stars in the
Milky Way,][]{wielen77,seabroke07}. We suggest that the gas
was already turbulent during the epoch in which the young, bright
stars (which dominate the observed continuum emission) were
formed. This is in contrast to a scenario in which the
stars were formed from a gas cloud with a low velocity dispersion,
which is subsequently inflated through stellar feedback to the
turbulent-gas disks currently observed. To account for this initial
turbulence, external sources of gas may be required. One possibility
is that these galaxies are undergoing large amounts of
gas accretion, which can drive turbulence through momentum or can induce
turbulence through instabilities associated with gas rich disks \citep{dekel09a,forbes13,bour14}.
What is the fate of the young stellar populations we observe in G 20-2 and G 4-1?
It is difficult to significantly alter the stellar orbits in a galaxy
short of a major merger. A violent event such as this, however, would
\textit{increase} the stellar velocity dispersions of the host
galaxies involved \citep{dasy06,schauer14}. We observe young stellar populations in G 20-2 and
G 4-1 with large velocity dispersions suggesting a thick disk of
stars. As this population ages, it will likely become a similarly
thick distribution of old stars akin to thick disks observed in
low-redshift disk galaxies. We suggest that these
galaxies contain a young, thick disk, which is in the process of forming.
We have shown in Figure~\ref{figure:expprof} that these galaxies are
well approximated by an exponential disk, allowing us to
estimate their disk thicknesses by considering the vertical
component of the stellar velocity
dispersion.
We calculate disk scale heights using
the equation \citep{vdkAA11}:
\begin{equation}\label{equation:height}
h_{z}=\frac{\sigma_{z}^{2}}{c \pi G \Sigma_{\mathcal{M}_{*}}}
\end{equation}
where $h_{z}$ represents the scale height, $\sigma_{z}$ is the vertical
stellar velocity dispersion, $G$ is
the gravitational constant, $\Sigma_{\mathcal{M}_{*}}$ is the
stellar mass surface density, and c is an empirical constant which varies
between 3/2 for an exponential disk and 2 for an isothermal
distribution. Here we choose a value of 3/2 which is often used in
studies of disk galaxies. We calculate our stellar mass surface density using:
\begin{equation}\label{equation:sigma}
\Sigma_{\mathcal{M}_{*}}(r)=\frac{\mathcal{M}_{*}}{2\pi h^{2}}e^{-r/h}
\end{equation}
Where $\mathcal{M}_{*}$ is the total stellar mass, $r$ is the
radius, and $h$ is
the exponential disk scale length. We take previously reported stellar
masses from Table
\ref{table:physparam}, and we determine scale lengths from
exponential disk fits presented in Figure \ref{figure:expprof} and
also reported in Table \ref{table:physparam}.
Evaluating Equation \ref{equation:sigma} at the average radius of our
$\sigma_{d,*}$ measurements results in $\Sigma_{\mathcal{M}_{*}}$
values of 198 and 650
M$_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$ for G 20-2 and G 4-1 respectively.
What remains is to determine values of $\sigma_{z}$ from our observed
velocity dispersions.
The disk velocity dispersions reported in Section
\ref{section:skin} are line of sight values which contain a
contribution from the radial and tangential velocity dispersions
($\sigma_{R}$ and $\sigma_{\phi}$). We can recover the vertical component
of velocity dispersion using the equation \citep{shapiro03}:
\begin{equation}\label{equation:siglos}
\sigma_{\textrm{los}}^{2}=[\sigma_{R}^{2} \sin^{2}\theta + \sigma_{\phi}^{2}
\cos^{2} \theta] \sin^{2}i + \sigma_{z}^{2}\cos^{2}i
\end{equation}
with $i$ representing the inclination angle (determined from axis
ratios measured with GALFIT, \citealp{peng02}) and $\theta$ the
position angle from the major axis in the plane of the disk. To
isolate $\sigma_{z}$ we consider the ratios $\alpha \equiv \sigma_{z}$/$\sigma_{R}$
and $\beta \equiv \sigma_{\phi}$/$\sigma_{R}$. Combining these with Equation
\ref{equation:siglos} and taking an average over $\theta$ results in:
\begin{equation}\label{equation:sigz}
\sigma_{z} = \frac{\sigma_{\textrm{los}}}{\cos i}
\left(1+\frac{(\beta^{2}+1)\tan^{2}i}{2\alpha^{2}}\right)^{-1/2}
\end{equation}
From kinematics observations of the Solar Neighborhood these values
are found to be 0.5 $<$ $\alpha$ $<$ 0.6 and 0.6 $<$ $\beta$
$<$ 0.7 for the thin disk of the Milky Way. While it
is likely that observations of radially decreasing vertical velocity
dispersions will be reflected in $\alpha$ and $\beta$, radial
dependence of these values has yet to be measured
\citep{bersh10}.
Measurements of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in external
galaxies are also limited. The best example is that of
\citet{shapiro03}, who compare integrated velocity dispersions along
the major and minor axes of 6 nearby spiral galaxies from
spectroscopic observations allowing them to measure $\alpha$
directly. This results
in 0.5 $<$ $\alpha$ $<$ 0.8 increasing with Hubble type from Sc to
Sa. This increase, however, could simply be a result of an increased
influence of the bulge at earlier
types. Values for later types are found in the range 0.5
$<$ $\alpha$ $<$ 0.7 in agreement with measurements of
\citet{vdk99}, who measure $\alpha$ of 36 edge-on, late type galaxies (Sb - Sd)
from photometry using empirical relations of \citet{bott93}.
As discussed previously, our large values of $\sigma_{c,*}$ may
be influenced by a young galactic bulge. Thus for estimating the thickness of
our galactic disks we take $\sigma_{\textrm{los}}$ =
$\sigma_{d,*}$. For our inclination corrections we take $\alpha$ = 0.6
and $\beta$ = 0.7, but we note that these values are based on
assumptions that may be invalid for young, marginally stable disks.
We believe it is reasonable to assume that velocity dispersions during
disk assembly
are closer to isotropic, forcing $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to values closer
to 1. In the limit $\alpha = \beta = 1$, Equation \ref{equation:sigz} reduces to $\sigma_{z}$ =
$\sigma_{\textrm{los}}$. The large scale rotation in
these galaxies suggests that the true value of $\sigma_{z}$ will fall
somewhere between our inclination corrected value and $\sigma_{\textrm{los}}$.
We present our disk height calculations in Table \ref{table:thick}
using both $\sigma_{z}$ and $\sigma_{\textrm{los}}$ in Equation
\ref{equation:height}.
\begin{table}
\caption{Stellar Disk Thicknesses}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ c c c c c c c }
\hline\hline
Galaxy & $\sigma_{\textrm{los}}$ & $\sigma_{z}$ &
$h_{z,\textrm{los}}$ & $h_{z,corr}$ \\
& km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & pc & pc \\
\hline
G 4-1 & 47.5 & 41.6 & 171 & 131 \\
G 20-2 & 53.0 & 47.5 & 700 & 562 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}\label{table:thick}
\end{table}
We compare estimates of disk scale heights presented here with
\citet{yoach06} who fit two component (thin plus thick) disk models to
R-band photometry of local edge-on, late-type galaxies.
The disk heights we estimate for G 20-2
(562-700 pc) are consistent with the high end of thin disk scale
heights and the low end for thick disks. Our scale height estimate for
G 4-1, however, is well within the thin disk regime. A caveat to our
scale height estimates is that they are very dependent on our
assumptions which are based on normal disk galaxies. These assumptions
may not be valid for turbulent, gas-rich disks such as those studied here.
We also note that
estimates of the thin disk scale height of the Milky Way range 200-300
pc \citep{vdkAA11}.
An age dependence of stellar disk scale height is
predicted by the simulations \citet{bird13} who find that the
kinematics of a stellar population are inherited at birth. Stars
formed early are scattered by gas rich mergers \citep[or by
interactions with clumps][]{elme13b} to kinematically hot
orbits. The combination of young SSP ages and large velocity
dispersions we measure from GMOS-IFS data for galaxy G 20-2 are
consistent with the early stages of disk formation in the simulations of \citep{bird13}.
\subsection{Stellar Populations}
The star light that we measure in
our sample is dominated by A type stars which are responsible for
the strong Balmer absorption we observe (See Figure \ref{figure:cspecs}). From evolutionary studies of single
stellar population models it is known that the spectra of
galaxies change most significantly at early times as short lived
massive stars evolve off the main sequence. In particular we have
inferred from
visual inspection of the P\'{E}GASE templates that the
A-star-dominated phase
occurs approximately between 1 Myr and 1 Gyr. This qualitative assessment is consistent with the ages of our sample
from spectral fitting using a full set of P\'{E}GASE templates with
ages ranging from 1 Myr to 20 Gyr (see Section
\ref{section:tempage}). From this procedure we infer a SSP age of 500
Myr to be consistent with the stellar population which dominates the
continuum flux in our galaxies.
It is most likely that our galaxies also host an older,
less luminous, underlying stellar population. Apart from strong Balmer
absorption lines, we also observe absorption associated with iron
which must be produced in supernovae indicating multiple generations
of stars.
Regardless, by fitting our spectra using
spectral templates of young SSPs we are measuring the
kinematics of the young stars which are more closely associated with
the strongly emitting ionized gas.
Figure \ref{figure:cspecs} demonstrates that there is no obvious difference
between the underlying shape of the continuum spectra between the
regions of
strongest H$\beta$ emission
and the central regions. The only major difference is the equivalent
width of H$\beta$ emission which is likely due to a local difference
in specific star formation rate. This suggests that the stellar
populations contributing the largest portion of the observed flux in
our sample are similar across the extent of our galaxies, with ages
around 500 Myr.
\subsection{Fate of Star-Forming Clumps}\label{section:clumpfate}
We observe previously unresolved clumps of ionized gas within our
galaxies (see Figure \ref{figure:clumps}) which are completely
absent from the stellar light mapped by continuum emission.
The fate of these star-forming clumps is still uncertain. Due to their
high star formation rates it has been suggested that clumps such as these
will be dissolved by stellar feedback before they are able to migrate
into the centers of their host galaxies
\citep{murray10,genel12}. Previous studies of outflows in high
redshift clumpy galaxies have estimated clump
lifetimes in the range between 10 and 200 Myr
\citep{elme09,genzel11,newman12,wuyts12}. This is younger than the
$\chi^{2}$/DOF selected SSP age of our galaxies of 500 Myr. Figure
\ref{figure:agetst} shows however that SSP ages as young as 60 Myr
also provide reasonable kinematics fits.
We briefly mentioned in Section \ref{section:results} that we observe
evidence of a broad component in the [OIII] (5007 \AA) emission line
in galaxy G~20-2, possibly indicative of galactic scale winds. To
investigate this we create a flux-weighted mean spectrum of G~20-2
while removing emission line broadening associated with large scale rotation by
shifting each spaxel spectrally based on the ionized gas velocity map
presented in Figure \ref{figure:gaskine}. We then fit [OIII] (5007 \AA) with
a double Gaussian profile composed of a narrow and a broad component,
the latter being commonly associated with gas outflows
\citep[e.g.][]{westm12,arribas14}. We measure a broad component with a
velocity dispersion of 84 km s$^{-1}$ which is redshifted relative to
the narrow component by 5.5 km s$^{-1}$. Comparing with similar
measurement of LIRGs/ULIRGs from \citet{arribas14} we conclude that
this is evidence for weak galactic winds. This is consistent with a
scenario in which the galactic scale turbulence is not primarily
driven by star formation feedback, a result we previously inferred based
on stellar versus gas kinematics.
Reliably fitting a two component emission line profile to the Balmer
emission lines in our galaxies is hampered by the complex shape of the
corresponding strong absorption lines. For this reason, we defer
further analysis of galactic scale winds to future work which
will be based on Keck OSIRIS observations of Paschen $\alpha$.
We note here however, that the velocity dispersion of the narrow
component of [OIII] (5007 \AA) in the integrated spectra of G 20-2 is
40.0 km s$^{-1}$, consistent with mean values presented in Section
\ref{section:globalsigma}. This suggests that our results are not significantly
affected by the absence of a broad component in our emission line
fitting procedure.
The smooth appearance of the continuum images of our galaxies
would appear to favor of short clump lifetimes, however this is not
necessarily the case. In the simulations of \citet{bour14}, large gas
outflow rates from massive ($>$10$^{8}$ M$_{\odot}$) clumps are matched
by large amounts of gas accretion. This allows clumps to survive long
enough to spiral into the center of their host galaxy while retaining
a constant mass. These simulations predict that this process should be
complete for most clumps (excluding those formed at large radii) in
less than 500 Myr. During infall the old stellar component of these clumps
will continually be stripped, possibly fueling thick disk
formation. Therefore, if these simulations are representative of the galaxies
presented here, the smooth appearance of the continuum images is not a
strong argument against long lived clumps. Such a scenario is
consistent with the theoretical work of \citet{dekel2013b}.
We show in Section \ref{section:beamsmearing} that the large velocity
dispersions we measure in the central regions of G 20-2 and G 4-1 are
not caused by beam smearing. We suggest that this is possible evidence
for a young bulge or pseudobulge formed from inspiralling clumps. From
long slit spectroscopy of the bulges of local late type galaxies,
\citet{fabri12} find velocity dispersions ranging from 50-200 km
s$^{1}$ consistent with central stellar velocity dispersions presented
here ($\sigma_{c,*}$ = 66.3 and 58.0~km~s$^{-1}$). In particular, they
find that pseudobulges (as indicated by low S\'ersic indices and
nuclear morphology that is similar to disks) have central stellar
velocity dispersion of 50-150 km s$^{-1}$ with an average of $\sim$100~km~s$^{-1}$. We note that the
largest stellar velocity dispersions we measure for single spaxels in the centers of G
20-2 and G 4-1 are $\sim$80~km~s$^{-1}$ after correcting for beam smearing.
In both of our galaxies the
bulge-disk decomposition of the stellar surface brightness profiles
result in bulges with very low S\'ersic index ($n_b\sim 0.5-0.8$);
typically low S\'ersic indices are indicative of pseudobulges in
nearby galaxies \citep{fisher2008}. However the bulges in our galaxies
have significant differences compared to those typical of low redshift
samples. Both galaxies, particularly G20-2, are more compact than
typical of pseudobulges \citep{fisher2010}. Also it is difficult to
interpret the properties of our bulges as the central starburst in
each galaxy may affect the mass-to-light ratios. Nonetheless, a
plausible scenario may be that pseudobulges (or at least pseudobulges
in S0-Sb galaxies) are constructed through multiple mechanisms
including early build up from clumps and in more recent epochs from
secular evolution. This may be supported both by the near ubiquity of
clumpy galaxies at high redshift \citep{tacc13} and pseudobulge
galaxies at low redshift \citep{fisher2011}. In this case, we may be
observing the early stages of pseudobulge formation in our target
galaxies.
Considering both morphological and dynamical information obtained from
GMOS-IFS data we find that galaxies G 20-2 and G 4-1 are
consistent with an early evolutionary state of massive late-type
galaxies characterized by rapid bulge growth through the infall of
gas rich clumps.
\subsection{Analogues to High Redshift Clumps?}
We observe many similarities between our galaxies and clumpy galaxies
observed at high redshift. Galaxies in the DYNAMO sample were initially selected for their extreme
H$\alpha$ emission (and thus extreme star formation) while excluding
AGN \citep{green13}. Resolved kinematic
measurements reveal a number of them to exhibit smooth rotation and
large velocity dispersions typical of high redshift samples \citep{genzel08,law09,swinbank11,wisnioski12}. Studies
at both epochs have also inferred large sSFRs based on the
Kennicut-Schmidt relation \citep{kenni98}. These findings
imply large gas fractions which have subsequently been confirmed both
at high redshift \citep{tacc10,daddi10,tacc13} and in the DYNAMO sample
(Fisher et al. submitted).
Furthermore, the GMOS observations presented here reveal two
compact disk-like galaxies from DYNAMO host clumps similar to
those observed at high redshift, providing further evidence of their
similarity to high-redshift clumpy disks.
False color images we produce highlighting
the differences between emission line regions and the stellar
continuum bear a striking resemblance to false color images of high
redshift clumpy galaxies from \citet{wuyts12} which are of similar
stellar mass to galaxies presented here. We note that this comparison may not be
entirely fair, however, as their clumpy images are produced from rest
frame ultraviolet rather than emission lines.
Quantitatively we find,
based on preliminary measurements of DYNAMO HST imaging, that
properties of individual DYNAMO clumps closely mirror those of clumps
at high redshift. Both clump luminosity and size are the subject of a
forthcoming paper to which we defer detailed analysis (Fisher et
al. in prep). For DYNAMO galaxies G~04-1 and G~20-2 we find that
individual clumps have luminosities ranging $L_{H\alpha}\sim
10^{41}-10^{43}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ (corresponding to
$\sim1-10$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$). These fluxes are significantly
brighter than observations of local HII regions
\citep{wisnioski12,liverm12}, and comparable to what is observed in
clumps of high redshift galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{genzel08,wisnioski12}.
\section{Summary}\label{section:summary}
In this work we have presented the spatially-resolved
stellar-kinematics measurements of two young, star-forming
galaxies using IFS observations with the GMOS instrument at the Gemini
Observatories. These galaxies are taken from the larger DYNAMO
sample \citep{green10,green13} of extremely H$\alpha$ luminous galaxies
selected from SDSS DR4 as possible analogues of high-redshift clumpy
disks.
Previous studies of these objects have shown them to contain
a turbulent rotating disk of ionized gas. It was not known, however,
if the source of this turbulence was feedback (e.g. driven by star-formation)
or dynamical instabilities (such as caused by a gas-rich disk).
By showing that the kinematics of the ionised gas and the dominant,
young stellar population are closely coupled we provide strong evidence
for the latter scenario. Our
findings can be summarized as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item For galaxy G 20-2, we confirm that the previously reported
gas turbulence is not an artifact of beam smearing or spatial
resolution. For galaxy
G 4-1 we find disk velocity dispersions $\sim$20 km s$^{-1}$ lower
than previously reported values. While beam smearing make a small
contribution the difference is driven more by the low sensitivity
of previous observations in the outer disk.
\item In both galaxies, the rotation of the stars and ionized gas
are closely coupled,
and characterized by smooth rotation and large velocity dispersions.
Velocity dispersions of both components are found to be $\sim10$
km s$^{-1}$ larger
than values measured in nearby disk galaxies ($\sim20$ km s$^{-1}$).
\item We have determined that the stellar populations which dominate
the optical continuum light are composed of young stars with ages
of 60-500 Myr. Their large stellar velocity dispersion ($\sim 50$ km s$^{-1}$)
is in marked contrast to that of the young stellar population in the disk
of the Milky Way \citep[$\sim 5$--10 km s$^{-1}$ for $<1$ Gyr,][]{wielen77,seabroke07}.
\item We resolve clumpy substructure in the ionized gas
component of these galaxies that was not previously
apparent. This supports the idea that these
galaxies are analogous to young and clumpy disk galaxies at high redshift.
\end{itemize}
If the star formation in these galaxies is rapidly truncated and they
continue to evolve in the absence of major mergers, they may eventually
resemble S0 galaxies or the bulges of late type galaxies we see
nearby. This is a likely outcome
as it is difficult to significantly alter the velocity profile of the
stellar component of a galaxy; the velocity dispersions of stellar
populations are effectively inherited from the gas in which they
formed. As star formation continues to gradually
deplete the gas content, the gas disk will thin and produce future
generations of stars with smaller scale heights. This scenario could also
result in galaxies similar to the Milky Way, assuming that the stellar
component we currently observe will becomes a thick disk of old
stars. If the DYNAMO sample shares the same fate as high-redshift galaxies
(as they share many physical properties) then it is possible that
high-redshift clumpy disks truly represent progenitors of disks and
S0 galaxies locally, as predicted by theory. \\
\\ \\
Support for this project is provided in part by the Victorian Department of State
Development, Business and Innovation through the Victorian
International Research Scholarship (VIRS). We also acknowledge
support from ARC Discovery Project DP130101460. This work is based on
observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory (programs
GN-2011B-Q-54 and GS-2011B-Q-88), which is operated by
the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,
under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini
partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the
National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian
Research Council (Australia), Minist\'{e}rio da Ci\^{e}ncia,
Tecnologia e Inova\c{c}\~{a}o (Brazil) and Ministerio de Ciencia,
Tecnolog\'{i}a e Innovaci\'{o}n Productiva (Argentina).
\bibliographystyle{mn2e}
|
\section*{Acknowledgements:}
This work was partially supported by CNPq and CAPES (Brazilian Government Agencies).
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
To a zeroth order approximation, disc galaxies can be considered as
consisting of two simple components: an axisymmetric disc and a dark
matter halo. In the majority of cases, however, it is necessary
to consider also at least a classical bulge and/or a bar, two components whose
contribution to the total mass and light can be very significant and
which can play an important role in the dynamical evolution of the galaxy.
A more realistic picture will necessitate yet more components,
such as a stellar halo, a thick disc, spiral arms, rings and lenses.
None of these components is simple. To take the bar as an
example, its description as an ellipsoid is in most cases
over-simplified, because the bar can include ansae \citep{Sandage.61,
Laurikainen.SBK.09, Martinez.VKB.07},
can have a rectangular-like outline \citep{Athanassoula.MWPPLB.90,
Gadotti.09, Gadotti.11} and,
when seen edge-on, can have what is referred to as a boxy/peanut/X
bulge (hereafter the B/P/X bulge),
i.e. an inner part which is vertically thicker than the outer part
and has the shape of a box, a peanut, or an `X'. The formation and
evolution of this feature have been witnessed in a number of numerical
simulations (see \citealt{Athanassoula.15} for a review, as well as
\citealt{Combes.Sanders.81}; \citealt{Combes.DFP.90};
\citealt{Pfenniger.Friedli.91}; \citealt{Raha.SJK.91};
\citealt{Berentzen.HSF.98, Athanassoula.Misiriotis.02};
\citealt{Athanassoula.03, Debattista.CMM.04,Athanassoula.05}; \citealt{
Martinez.VSH.06, Berentzen.SMVH.07}; etc.).
Simulations of disc galaxies have given us a lot of information on the
formation and evolution of bars, the angular momentum exchanged in
barred galaxies and the secular evolution that ensues \citep[see][for
a review, and references therein]{Athanassoula.13}. However,
in order to safely apply the results of these simulations to barred
galaxies and their observations, it is necessary to first make sure
that they reproduce well the observed bar properties, be they
morphological, photometrical, kinematical or, whenever the
simulations allow it, chemical. Morphological comparisons are
particularly important, since bar morphological properties have been
extensively studied (see \citealt{Buta.13a} and \citeyear{Buta.13b}
for reviews and references therein; see also
e.g. \citealt{Kormendy.79}, \citealt{Elmegreen.Elmegreen.85},
\citealt{Erwin.Sparke.03}, \citealt{Kormendy.Kennicutt.04},
\citealt{Buta.LSBK.06} and
\citealt{Laurikainen.SBK.09}). In contrast, not many
simulation studies have focused on morphology. Nevertheless,
considerable progress was made by \cite{Athanassoula.Misiriotis.02},
who reproduced and discussed ansae and who also found that the bar
outline in strongly barred simulations was more rectangular-like that
elliptical-like, in good agreement with observations
\citep{Athanassoula.MWPPLB.90, Gadotti.09, Gadotti.11}.
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{NGC4314.jpg}
\caption{NIRS0S image of NGC 4314. The two components of the bar are
clearly discernible. The inner component is shorter and fatter and
the outer longer and more elongated (reproduced from
\citealt{Laurikainen.SBK.11}, by permission of Oxford University
press). The units on both axes are arcsec.}
\label{fig:NGC4314}
\end{figure*}
In this paper, we will investigate a morphological feature of bars
which has only lately been outlined, namely the barlens (often
referred to as bl for short). \color{black}{These are lens-like components
found in
the central parts of barred galaxies and first unambiguously
identified, named and discussed by \cite{Laurikainen.SBK.11} in
a study of the NIRS0S survey (Near-IR S0 galaxy Survey), where many
images of galaxies with barlenses can be seen (see also
\citealt{Laurikainen.Salo.15} for an observational review).
Viewed face-on, their outline is oval to circular-like, in the direction
along the bar major axis they are shorter than the
thin bar component \citep{Laurikainen.SABBJ.13} and perpendicular to
it they are more extended. They are distinct from nuclear lenses
because of their much larger sizes and
also from standard lenses \citep{Kormendy.79, Kormendy.Kennicutt.04}
because they are shorter than bars.}
Further images of galaxies with barlenses can, in
retrospect, be identified in e.g.
{\it The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies} \citep{Sandage.61}, in
fig. 2 of \cite{Buta.LSBK.06} and in figs. 8 and 12 of \cite{Gadotti.08}.
They can also be seen in numerous publications based on the NIRS0S survey
\citep{Laurikainen.SB.05, Laurikainen.SBKSB.06, Laurikainen.SBK.07,
Laurikainen.SBK.09, Laurikainen.SBKC.10}.
Here we display in Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC4314} the NIRS0S image of NGC 4314, a
characteristic
barlens example (reproduced from \citealt{Laurikainen.SBK.11}). In
this and many other cases one can see that the
bar can be described as a sum of two components, a short, fat,
lens-like component, and
a thin and much longer component. It is the former of these
components that is the barlens. A statistical
study of the NIRS0S sample provided useful information on the frequency with
which barlenses can be found in disc galaxies and on their sizes
\citep{Laurikainen.SABBJ.13}. These observational studies, however, were
not followed by any theoretical or simulation-based study. We thus ignore
whether the barlens is an independent component, or a
morphological feature of the bar, and know nothing on how it forms and
evolves. We will aim at answering some of these questions in this
paper.
For this, we will use a number of high resolution simulations of bar
formation and evolution in disc galaxies, and compare the
morphology of their bars with that of the bars
in the NIRS0S and the S$^4$G samples. The NIRS0S sample
\citep{Laurikainen.SBK.11} consists of about 200 nearby early-type galaxies,
mainly S0s, observed in the $K_S$ band using 3-4 m class telescopes
in good seeing conditions (full width at half-maximum $\sim$1 arcsec). The
sample selection criteria include the type ($-3 \le T \le 1$),
total magnitude ($B_T \le 12.5$) and inclination ($i \le 65^{\circ}$). The
S$^4$G survey
\citep{Sheth.p.10} is an
Exploration Science Legacy Program carried out on the {\it Spitzer}
post-cryogenic mission. It includes more than 2300 galaxies from the
nearby Universe ($ D < 40$ Mpc) observed with the Infrared Array Camera
(IRAC) at 3.6 and 4.5 $\mu$. Its spatial resolution is
approximately 2 arcsec.
This paper is organized as follows. In Sect.~\ref{sec:bar-struct} we
summarize theoretical results relevant to bar structure and morphology
and in Sect.~\ref{sec:simulations} we present the simulations. In
Sect.~\ref{sec:global} we
compare the morphology and the radial surface density profiles of real
to that of simulated galaxies and in Sects.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits} and
\ref{sec:decompositions} compare the results of the ellipse fits and
decompositions. We discuss our results in
Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion} and conclude in Sect.~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
Further observational support for our work is presented in
an accompanying observational paper \citep[][hereafter
L+14]{Laurikainen.SABHE.14}.
\section{The structure of bars}
\label{sec:bar-struct}
When bars form they are vertically thin, no thicker than the disc
they form in. This configuration, however, is vertically not stable
\citep{Binney.78} and, after a relatively short time, the inner part
of the bar thickens considerably and protrudes clearly out of the
galactic disc (for a review see \citealt{Athanassoula.15} and also
references therein and in Sect.~\ref{sec:introduction}).
It is important to stress that it is {\it not} the whole bar that
thickens, but only the inner parts, the outer parts remaining thin
\citep{Athanassoula.05}. The bar can thus be considered as consisting
of two parts, an outer and an inner part, the former being thin both
in the equatorial plane and vertically to it, and the latter being
thick in both these directions. Let us now check how
theoretical work and observations compare with this picture.
This bar structure can be easily understood with the help of 3D orbital
structure \citep*{Pfenniger.84, Skokos.PA.02a, Skokos.PA.02b}. The
backbone of the bar is the $x_1$ family of orbits, which
are periodic -- closing after one revolution and two radial
oscillations -- planar and elongated along the bar
\citep{Contopoulos.Papayannopoulos.80, Athanassoula.BMP.83}. They are stable
over most of the family extent, and thus trap regular orbits around
them. This family
has, nevertheless, a number of vertical instabilities, from which bifurcate
other families, often called $x_1v_1$, $x_1v_2$, $x_1v_3$, etc.
\citep{Pfenniger.84, Skokos.PA.02a, Skokos.PA.02b}. Their orbits
have shapes which, projected on the equatorial plane, are
similar to those of the $x_1$ family orbits, but, contrary to those of
the $x_1$, they can have a considerable vertical
extent. Some of these families have important stable parts, and can thus
trap regular orbits around them. These constitute the B/P/X bulge
and orbital structure suggests that its major axis length is shorter than
that of the bar \citep*{Patsis.SA.02}. This has been well confirmed
and established by simulations \citep[][and later]{Athanassoula.05} by
measuring the length of the B/P/X bulge in a side-on\footnote{In the
side-on view the galaxy is
observed edge-on and the line of sight is on the equatorial
plane along the minor axis of the bar.} view, and the length
of the bar in a face-on one and comparing the two lengths. Their
ratio, according to orbital structure theory, can take values within a
wide range, depending on which perpendicular family sets the
extent of the structure.
The value of this ratio was considered for the case of M31 by
\cite{Athanassoula.Beaton.06} and will be further discussed here for a
number of $N$-body simulations. Let us now briefly
review the input from observations.
In our Galaxy the bar is seen edge-on and, due to the location of the
sun, is seen only after an integration
along lines of sight spanning an angular extent of several degrees. For these
reasons it is not possible to have a clear
view of the bar morphology, so that the thin and the thick bar components
were initially considered as two independent bars, with, moreover,
two independent position
angles and were thus assumed to rotate at different pattern speeds
\citep{Hammersley.GMLC.00, Benjamin.P.05, Cabrera.LHGFLCGM.07,
Lopez.CCLMHGGF.07, Cabrera.LGFGHLC.08,
Churchwell.BMWBICRPWB.09}. More recent work,
however, argued clearly that these
two bars can simply be the thin and the thick part of a single bar
\citep{Athanassoula.06, Romero.GAAF.11, Martinez.VG.11}.
Boxy/peanut bulges can of course be easily distinguished in edge-on or
near-edge-on external galaxies, since they clearly protrude out of the
disc plane.
Using photometry, it is also possible to show that there
is an associated thin component, embedded in the
disc. \cite{Lutticke.DP.00} and \cite{Bureau.AADBF.06} used infrared
images of samples of 60 and 30 edge-on galaxies, respectively, and
analysed the luminosity profile from narrow slits along or parallel
to, but offset from, the major axis of each galaxy. They could thus
verify the existence of the thin and the thick part of the bar and
measure their relative extents, as well as some further relevant
quantities. In several cases, however, this task can be rendered
very complex by the existence of other thin components in the
disc, such as lenses or rings \citep[e.g.][]{Wakamatsu.Hamabe.84,
Kormendy.Kennicutt.04}.
Unexpectedly, it is in inclined, but not necessarily edge-on, galaxies
that the existence of the two parts of the bar can be seen easiest.
This was first noted for NGC 4442 by
\cite{Bettoni.Galletta.94}, for NGC 7582 by \cite{Quillen.KFD.97} and for
M31 by \cite{Athanassoula.Beaton.06} and \cite{Beaton.MGSCGPAB.07},
galaxies which have
an inclination of 72$^\circ$, 65$^\circ$ and 77$^\circ$,
respectively. A much larger sample of 78 galaxies, including
intermediate inclination angles, was analysed by
\cite{Erwin.Debattista.13}.
$N$-body simulations are of course particularly well suited for
studying components with such a complex shape as bars, because they
can be viewed from any desired angle. Thus, the extent of the thin part
of the bar can be measured from the face-on view, while that of the
thick part from the side-on one. The snapshot can then be
viewed from intermediate inclination angles
in order to educate the eye to distinguish the existence and
the extent of the thin and thick parts of the bar. This was first
performed on simulations by \cite{Athanassoula.Beaton.06},
in order to obtain the necessary expertise to distinguish the bar in
M31 and get information on its properties, and later by
\cite{Erwin.Debattista.13}, who
extended this work to intermediate inclination angles.
But what about the
near-face-on, or moderately inclined galaxies? Answering this
question is a primary goal of our paper.
\section{Simulations}
\label{sec:simulations}
For comparisons with observations, we will use two groups of
simulations initially made to study the effect of gas and of halo
properties on bar formation and evolution. The first one includes
simulations with gas and with
spherical or triaxial haloes, each one of which will be denoted by 6
characters. The first three are `gtr' ({\bf g} for {\bf g}as and {\bf
tr} for {\bf
tr}iaxial), and are common to all simulations of the group. The
last three form a number which distinguishes the various simulations
of the group between them. These simulations were described in
detail in (\citealt*{Athanassoula.MR.13}, hereafter AMR13) so we will
describe them here only briefly. The second group is designated by the
first three letters `gcs' ({\bf g} for {\bf g}as and {\bf cs} for {\bf
c}u{\bf s}p) and has many points in common with the first
group (Athanassoula, in prep.).
In their
initial conditions, all gtr and gcs simulations have a disc and a halo
component, the main difference between the two groups being that the
halo of the gtr has a small core, while that of the gcs a
cusp\footnote{In radial profiles with a core, the halo density levels off
as one reaches the centre, while in cuspy profiles it keeps
increasing with decreasing radius.}.
All simulations were run with the \textsc{gadget} code
\citep{Springel.YW.2001, Springel.Hernquist.02, Springel.Hernquist.03,
Springel.05}, a softening of 50 pc for all components, and a
cell-opening criterion corresponding to an error tolerance for the force of
0.005\footnote{For more information on the algorithmic and numerical aspects
of \textsc{gadget} and the exact definition of its parameters see the
manual in http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/$\sim$volker/gadget and
the above mentioned references.}.
The \textsc{gadget} code offers the possibility of using several types of
particles for the various components of the galaxy. In the following we
will use four types, namely: \textsc{halo}, \textsc{disk},
\textsc{gas} and \textsc{stars}. The \textsc{disk} particles represent stars
already present in the initial conditions and their number
remains constant throughout the simulation. But as the simulation
evolves, new stars (\textsc{stars}) form from gas (\textsc{gas}), so that
the number of \textsc{gas} particles decreases, while that of
\textsc{stars} increases.
At any time, the \textsc{disk} particles and the
\textsc{star} particles together represent the stars of the galaxy,
the \textsc{disk} component describing older stars than the
\textsc{stars} component. But all the \textsc{stars} do not represent
young stars. Indeed, a fair fraction of them are formed during the
first two Gyr and thus have similar age and dynamics to that of
\textsc{disk} particles. The main difference between the two
components is that all the \textsc{disk} particles represent the old
stellar population, while a fraction of the \textsc{stars} describe
the young stellar population. This fraction, however, is a strongly
decreasing function of time (see Fig. 2 of AMR13), because the
simulations do not include accretion.
The \textsc{disk} has in all cases the same functional form for the
initial azimuthally
averaged density distribution, namely
\begin{equation}
\rho_d (R, z) = \frac {M_d}{4 \pi h^2 z_0}~~exp (- R/h)~~sech^2 (\frac{z}{z_0}),
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $R$ is the cylindrical radius, $M_d$ is the disc mass, $h$ is the
disc radial scalelength and $z_0$ is the disc vertical scale
thickness.
It also has the same initial radial velocity dispersion profile, namely
\begin{equation}
\label{eq_svR}
\sigma_R(R) = 100 \cdot \exp\left(-R/3h\right) \; {\rm km \, s^{-1}} \, .
\end{equation}
For all gtr runs the initial $\textsc{disk}$ component has a radial
scalelength of $h=3$~kpc, a scale
height of $z_0=0.6$~kpc, and the mass of each individual particle
is $m_{\textsc{disk}}= 2.5 \times 10^{5}~M_{\odot}$.
The corresponding numbers for the gcs simulations are $h=4$~kpc,
$z_0=0.6$~kpc, and $m_{\textsc{disk}}=6.25 \times 10^{4}~M_{\odot}$.
For the gas, we adopt the same radial profile and the same scalelength
as for the stellar disc. This is necessary in order to be able to make
sequences of models where only the gas fraction changes, while the
rotation curve stays the same for all practical purposes. The gas scaleheight
is considerably smaller than that of the stars and its precise value is
set by the hydrostatic equilibrium achieved during the iterative
calculation of the initial conditions \citep{Rodionov.Athanassoula.11}.
For gtr simulations the
haloes have been built so as to have, within the allowed accuracy,
in all cases the same spherically averaged initial radial profile, namely
\begin{equation}
\rho_h (r) = \frac {M_h}{2\pi^{3/2}}~~ \frac{\alpha}{r_c} ~~\frac
{exp(-r^2/r_c^2)}{r^2+\gamma^2},
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $r$ is the radius, $M_h$ is the mass of the halo and $\gamma$
and $r_c$ are the halo core and cut-off radii, respectively. The
parameter $\alpha$ is a normalization constant defined by
\begin{equation}
\alpha = [1 - \sqrt \pi~~exp (q^2)~~(1 -erf (q))]^{-1},
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $q=\gamma / r_c$ \citep[][]{Hernquist.93}. All simulations have
$\gamma=1.5$~kpc, $r_{c}=30$~kpc and $M_{h}=2.5 \times 10^{11}~M_{\odot}$.
The mass of each halo particle is equal to $m_{halo}= 2.5 \times 10^{5}~M_{\odot}$.
In this group of simulations, we consider three different initial halo
shapes: spherically
symmetric (halo 1), mildly triaxial with initial equatorial and vertical axial
ratios 0.8 and 0.6 (halo 2), respectively, and strongly triaxial with
initial axial ratios 0.6 and 0.4 (halo 3), respectively. As shown in AMR13,
these haloes evolve with time and their shapes become near spherical for halo2
and mildly triaxial for halo 3.
For all gcs simulations, the dark halo density profile follows that of
a truncated NFW halo (\citealt*{Navarro.FW.96,Navarro.FW.97})
\begin{equation}
\rho_{\rm h}(r) = \frac{C_{\rm h} \cdot T(r/r_t)}
{(r/r_h)(1+r/r_h)^2} \, ,
\label{eq_NFW}
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $T(r/r_t) = exp ( - r^2 / r_t^2) $,
$r_h$ is the halo scalelength, $C_h$ is a parameter defining
the mass of the halo, and $r_t$ is a characteristic radius for the
tapering. For all gcs models discussed here $r_h=11\;\rm kpc$ and
$r_t=50 \;\rm kpc$. For halo 4 models $C_h=0.0015$ and for
halo 5 ones $C_h=0.002$. In each of these simulations there are two million
particles in the halo.
The initial conditions of both groups were built using the iterative
procedure \citep*{Rodionov.AS.09, Rodionov.Athanassoula.11}. The
corresponding rotation curves of gtr models
are given in Fig. 1 of AMR13. The list of the runs analysed here, together
with their initial gas fraction and halo type are listed in
Tables~\ref{tab:rellipsefits} and \ref{tab:rdecompositions}. To
measure the bar strength during the evolution, we use
in all cases the maximum of the relative $m$=2 Fourier component, as
described in AMR13.
The next step is to use snapshots of the stellar disc component
in order to create mock images in form of fits files, which will be
analysed in
the same way as the observed fits images of galaxies.
Due to the relatively small differences between the density
distributions of the \textsc{disk} and \textsc{stars}, we used these
two components together in order to
improve the signal-to-noise ratio by increasing the number of
particles. Furthermore, as already mentioned above, most of the stars
were born in the first few Gyr of the simulation, so that the
\textsc{disk} and \textsc{stars} together amount to a population
compatible with the light emitted by disc galaxies in the near- or
mid- IR \citep{Meidt.plus.12a, Meidt.plus.12b, Meidt.plus.14,
Querejeta.plus.14}.
The analysis consists mainly of ellipse fits and
decompositions, and the techniques and results are described in
Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits} and \ref{sec:decompositions}.
\section{Global comparisons: morphology and radial surface density profiles}
\label{sec:global}
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig2a.jpg}
\caption{
Images and the corresponding surface brightness profiles shown along
the bar major (black lines) and minor axis (red lines in the online
version). The two left-hand columns
show the simulation models and the two right ones galaxies with
similar barlenses. The extent of the images has been chosen so as to
display in all cases the same region of the galaxy, namely the bar
region and,
whenever relevant, the inner ring. The galaxy images are
either $K_s$-band images from the NIRS0S Atlas, or 3.6 $\mu$m images
from the S$^4$G survey. Both the simulations and the galaxies are
shown in face-on view, and rotated so that the bar
appears in a horizontal position. The profiles cover the same
regions as the corresponding images. The name of the galaxy, or of
the simulation is given above the corresponding radial surface
brightness panel. The units of distance, density and
luminosity are arbitrary (see text).
}
\label{fig:comp-morpho}
\end{figure*}
A simple perusal of the face-on views of the gtr snapshots shown in
figs. 4 and 5 in AMR13
shows clearly that, like in observations, simulated bars are not
simple ellipsoidal objects, but have a more complex geometry. In
the equatorial plane, the inner part of the bar is considerably thicker
than the outer thin bar part and has an oval or near-circular shape. A
more detailed visual inspection shows that, the morphology
of these central components is such that,
had they been observed in galaxies, they would have been classified as
barlens components. In the rest of this paper we will
deepen and substantiate the comparison between barlenses in real
galaxies and their
counterparts in simulations, and, after establishing that the
latter should be called barlenses, we will examine in detail their
properties in order to get more information on the barlens structures.
Let us start with comparisons including the morphology
and the radial density profiles (Figs.~\ref{fig:comp-morpho},
\ref{fig:NGC5101_gtr115_prof} and \ref{fig:comp-NGC5101_gtr115}).
Fig.~\ref{fig:comp-morpho} compares the results from five simulated
galaxies (two left-hand columns) to those of five galaxies from the NIRS0S,
or from the S$^4$G surveys (two right-hand columns).
We carried out this exercise for many more snapshots and galaxies, but we
will limit ourselves here to five for brevity.
It is important to note that the five simulations shown in
Figs.~\ref{fig:comp-morpho} were
not run specifically so as to model the five chosen galaxies, they
were simply picked out by a cursory visual inspection of the images of
several snapshots of the gtr and gcs simulations
as reasonable matches to the five chosen
galaxies. Nevertheless, we get a good resemblance, both for the images and
the radial projected density profiles in the region we examine, i.e. a
rectangular region of linear extent somewhat larger than the bar
region and including, whenever relevant, the inner ring.
The upper row compares simulation gtr106, viewed at a time $t$=6 Gyr
after the beginning of the simulation, with an S$^4$G image of the galaxy
IC 5240. This comparison involves two of the longest and most elongated
barlenses and quite strong bars. As can be seen in the second panel
from the left, the bar projected surface
density profiles are quite flat, arguing for a strong bar (see
\citealt{Elmegreen.Elmegreen.85} and \citealt{Kim.plus.15} for the
observations and
\citealt{Athanassoula.Misiriotis.02} for the simulations). Indeed, it
was found in AMR13 that gtr106 was one of the strongest bars in that
set of simulations (see in particular figs. 4, 5, 7 and 8 in that
paper and the
corresponding discussions). In this example the extent of the thin bar
outside the barlens component is very short, amongst the shortest in
our sample. In both the
observed and the simulated galaxy profiles this manifests itself by a
ledge of very short extent. The part of the profile that is within the
ledge rises inwards, but much less steeply than that of classical
bulges. This will be discussed further in Sect.~\ref{subsec:NGC936}.
Note also that in both gtr106 and IC 5240,
there is an X-shape in the central regions, even though
the simulated galaxy is seen exactly face-on and IC 5240 quite far from
edge-on. Such a behaviour is discussed in detail in the accompanying
observational paper (L+14).
The second row from the top compares the image of the $t$=6 Gyr snapshot of gtr116
with the NIRS0S image of NGC 4608. In this case, the relevant extent of
the thin part of the bar --
relative to both the extent of the barlens and the size of the inner
ring -- is much longer than in the previous example.
Note also how thin in the equatorial plane
the part of the bar outside the barlens is in the (near-)face-on views of
both the galaxy and the simulation snapshot. Further discussion on NGC
4608 is given in Sect.~\ref{subsubsec:decomp-comparisons}.
The third row compares the $t$=6 Gyr image of gtr114 with the S$^4$G
image of NGC 4314. Both have a fairly round barlens and a strong thin
bar component. In the fourth row we compare
gtr110 at $t$=6 Gyr with the S$^4$G image of NGC 1512. Here the barlens is
similar to that in the two previous models, but the thin bar is
considerably less pronounced, and more dispersed.
Finally, in the bottom row we compare the $t$=6 Gyr image of gtr120 to
the S$^4$G image of NGC 1022. This is the weakest bar in this comparison,
and one of the weakest bars in the AMR13 simulations. This can be
witnessed also from the radial surface density profiles, which shows
clearly that the difference between the profiles along the directions
of the bar major and
minor axes is less than in the previous cases and that the bar has
an exponential profile. The latter according to
\cite{Athanassoula.Misiriotis.02} is a sign of a bar weaker than
those having a flat profile. In contrast, the barlens is still very
prominent.
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{ngc5101-labelled.jpg}
\caption{Left-hand panel: the bar region of NGC 5101 in the Ks band (from
the NIRS0S sample). Right-hand panel:
the surface brightness profiles of the simulation model gtr115 at $t$
= 6 Gyr (dashed line, red in the online version) and NGC 5101
(full black line), both shown along the bar
major axis. As in the previous figure, only the bar region is shown,
so that the sharp edge
in the profile is a manifestation of the edge of the bar. The units
for the NGC 5101 figure, as well as for the corresponding distance
along the bar (black line) are in arcsec, while those of the
simulations, are arbitrary. The units for projected density of the simulations
as well as for the luminosity for the observations, are arbitrary (see
text).
}
\label{fig:NGC5101_gtr115_prof}
\end{figure*}
The right-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC5101_gtr115_prof} compares the
radial projected
surface density profiles along the direction of the major axis of the bar
of gtr115 and NGC 5101. Their barlens regions look remarkably
similar, although the
former was not made specifically so as to model the latter. There is
also a further point to note in this figure, which can also be seen in
the radial profiles of Fig.~\ref{fig:comp-morpho}. The end of the thin
bar component can be easily distinguished on these profiles because of
a clear jump, or step, of the radial profile at this radius. On the
contrary, the profile has no feature which could indicate the
existence of a barlens or its extent.
This is presumably because the thin part of
the bar extends inwards into the barlens region and thus the profile along
the bar major axis includes contributions from both components.
It will be discussed further in Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion}.
\section{Ellipse fitting: Technique and results}
\label{sec:ellipsefits}
\subsection{Techniques}
\label{subsec:ell-technique}
We chose a fitting procedure which is identical to that used for the
NIRS0S galaxies, in order to allow comparisons.
Given the complex morphological structure of bars, any automatic
ellipse fitting would not give useful information concerning the
barlens component. For example, isophotes corresponding to the outer
regions of the barlens will also trace regions of the outer part of the
thin bar component and any automatic ellipse fit would be a compromise
between the shape of the
barlens and that of the thin outer parts of the bar. Thus, such fits
would be strongly biased and useless for our purposes. We therefore
resorted to a
fully interactive fitting procedure, which, although much more time
consuming, guarantees relevant fits.
For the simulated galaxies, before starting
the measurements, the simulation units of the image were converted to
magnitudes by logarithmic transformation, using a magnitude zero-point
of 24 mag/arcsec$^2$. The subsequent procedure was followed
{\it identically} for observed and for simulated galaxies. It is very
similar to that of masking, where regions which are heavily influenced
by other components are masked out. We first inspected all images to
determine the magnitude range in which the barlens is
best visible, and this was systematically used in all further
measurements. We then visualized each individual galaxy separately
and chose by eye points on the outermost edge of the barlens which are
not affected by the thin part of the bar. Thus these points avoid the
region around the direction of the bar major axis. An ellipse was
fitted to these points using the same software as for the NIRS0S
galaxies. Since the thin part of the bar is thin not only vertically
but also on the equatorial plane, the eliminated part is rather
restricted and the number of points and the area that is left after
elimination are well sufficient to allow an adequate fit, both for
observations and for simulations.
Our approach has two important advantages. First,
the measurements are not affected by the narrow outer
part of the bar (thin bar component), which in
automatic ellipse fitting would erroneously make the barlens too
elongated. Secondly, it is identical to the one used for the
observations, thus best allowing comparisons.
In order to obtain optimum conditions for comparisons of simulations
and observations, as well as to minimize the chances of any humanly
introduced bias, we
proceeded as follows. One of us (EA) chose the snapshots to be
analysed in view of the specific goals of our paper, and prepared the
fits files. Both the ellipse fits and the decompositions were made by
another member of the team (EL), who had also done this same analysis for
the NIRS0S sample galaxies. The full description of the runs and of the
corresponding snapshots was communicated to the analyser only after she
had completed the analysis. As a
result, some of the analysis was done two or three times. For example all
snapshots in Table~\ref{tab:tellipsefits} were analysed together and we
did not simply carry over the results from
Table~\ref{tab:rellipsefits} for $t$=6 cases. In this way, some of the
snapshots were measured independently two, or three times. A
posteriori, we use
this to set some estimates of the errors in the ellipse fits. We note
that for most cases the differences between the two independent
estimates of the same snapshots and quantities, are quite small,
less or of the order of 10\%, showing that the
measurements are repetitive, as they should. There is, however, one
case, namely gtr101 at $t$=6 Gyr, where the error reaches roughly
20\%. This is a very difficult case to measure and, as will be
discussed in the next section, we were also unable to make a good
decomposition. Furthermore, as will be discussed in
Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion}, the barlenses in the gas-less
simulations are less realistic than those in the remaining runs, with
more elongated shapes than usually observed. It is thus not surprising
that the parameters of this one case obtained from the ellipse fits are not as robust
as those of the other models.
\begin{table}
\caption[]{Results from our visually driven ellipse fits (see
Sect.~\ref{subsec:ell-technique}) for the barlenses (bl) and the
thin part of the bar (bar) in simulation results at time $t$=6
Gyr. }
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
run & Halo profile & initial & b/a (bl) & r$_{bl}$/r$_{bar}$ \\
& & gas [\%] & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr101 & 1: core/spherical & 0 & 0.43 & 0.77 \\
gtr106 & 1: core/spherical & 20 & 0.65 & 0.57 \\
gtr111 & 1: core/spherical & 50 & 0.95 & 0.37 \\
gtr116 & 1: core/spherical & 75 & 0.93 & 0.45 \\
gtr119 & 1: core/spherical & 100 & 0.74 & 0.56 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr102 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 0 & 0.45 & - \\
gtr109 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 20 & 0.74 & 0.47 \\
gtr114 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 50 & 0.88 & 0.46 \\
gtr117 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 75 & 0.89 & 0.81 \\
gtr120 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 100 & 0.94 & 0.51 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr110 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 20 & 0.68 & 0.49 \\
gtr115 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 50 & 0.93 & 0.52 \\
gtr118 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 75 & 0.88 & 0.53 \\
gtr121 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 100 & 0.88 & - \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
gcs006 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 0 & 0.64 & 0.94 \\
gcs001 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 20 & 0.89 & 0.46 \\
gcs002 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 40 & 0.96 & 0.44 \\
gcs003 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 60 & 0.90 & 0.52 \\
gcs004 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 80 & 0.95 & - \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gcs009 & 5: cusp2/spherical & 60 & 0.74 & 0.56 \\
gcs010 & 5: cusp2/spherical & 80 & 0.91 & 0.46 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:rellipsefits}
\end{table}
\vfill
\eject
Bar lengths were measured in a similar manner by visually
marking the outer edges of the bar. When the simulation
model has an inner ring there is some ambiguity, because the bar can be
considered to end where the ring starts (i.e. at the inner radius
of the ring ), or to continue all through
the ring, (i.e. to end at the outer radius of the ring), or to
end at
some intermediate position. Which of these estimates is best is
debatable, and may even depend on the case at hand. Here we follow
the same definition as in the NIRS0S observations,
namely that the end of the bar is defined by the ridge-line of the
ring, in order to allow comparisons between simulations and observations,
particularly since the bar length estimate will be used
further in the decompositions (see Sect.~\ref{sec:decompositions}).
\begin{table}
\caption[]{Results of the axial ratio and relative radial extent of
the barlens (bl) component for three simulations, as obtained from
our visually driven ellipse fits (see
Sect.~\ref{subsec:ell-technique}).
}
\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
Time [Gyr] -$>$ & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
{\it gtr101:} & & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
b/a(bl) &0.59 &0.53 &0.50 &0.47 &0.44 &0.43 \\
r$_{bl}$/r$_{bar}$ &0.61 &0.78 &0.86 &0.84 & - & - \\%0.98 &1.00 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
{\it gtr111:} & & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
b/a(bl) &0.93 & 0.95&0.53 &0.64 &0.79 & 0.83\\
r$_{bl}$/r$_{bar}$ &0.39 &0.34 &0.74 &0.69 &0.56 &0.57 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
{\it gtr119:} & & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
b/a(bl) &0.72 &0.69 &0.79 &0.79 &0.72 & 0.75\\
r$_{bl}$/r$_{bar}$ & - & 0.61&0.53 &0.61 &0.64 &0.61 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\end{tabular}
\label {tab:tellipsefits}
\end{table}
\subsection{Results}
\label{subsec:ell-results}
Table \ref{tab:rellipsefits} gives information on the ellipses fitted to
the face-on images of the simulation snapshots at time $t$ = 6 Gyr from the
beginning of the run. The first three columns give the simulation
name, its initial halo characteristics and the initial fraction of its
baryons that is in the form of gas,
respectively. The fourth and fifth columns give the axial ratio
of the barlens component and its extent along the bar major axis
normalized by the bar length. The five packages in this Table
(separated by a blank horizontal line) correspond to the five
different halo radial
profiles, halo 1 to halo 5, described in Sect.~\ref{sec:simulations}.
Results from different
viewing angles will be discussed later (see Table~\ref{tab:view-decomp}
and Sect.~\ref{subsubsec:test-decomp}).
In this, as in all subsequent tables, a dash as an entry means that no
safe estimate for this quantity could be found. This occurs
particularly, but not exclusively, in cases like gcs004 or gtr121,
where the thin part of the bar is so weak that it is very hard to
measure its extent as reliably as we did for other simulations. We
will therefore omit these cases from most of the following
discussions, where the barlength estimate is necessary. Some values
for gtr101 and gcs006 are also unsafe because the barlens
covers most of the thin bar extent and the barlens shapes are less
realistic (Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion}). We have, nevertheless, kept
some of these
value in the tables as a reminder that there are cases where the
barlens extent covers a very large fraction of that of the bar.
The two most elongated
barlenses are those of gtr101 (axial ratio 0.43) and gtr102 (0.45),
both cases being simulations with no gas and amongst the strongest bars
in AMR13. The remaining simulation with no gas (gcs006) has an axial
ratio of 0.64. Note that these simulations are the ones for which the
ratio of barlens to bar extent is the most unsafe. In all simulations
with gas, the
barlenses are considerably nearer to near-circular, with most
axial ratios between 0.7 and 1.0.
The ratio of the extent of the barlens to that of the thin bar component has
a lower limit of $\sim$0.4 and an upper one of $\sim$0.9. We will
discuss the
implications of this result in Sect.~\ref{subsec:orbits}.
Table \ref{tab:tellipsefits} gives information on the barlens
shape and on the ratio of its extent to that of the bar, for three
simulations and six snapshot times, spaced by 1 Gyr. These three simulations
are good examples of a very strong, an intermediate and a weak bar.
This table shows clearly that the
fractional change of the barlens shape, as well as of its extent
relative to the bar vary considerably from one case to
another. Amongst the three, the least
variation is found for gtr119, where the changes are barely of the
order of 10 per cent, and the most for gtr101 where the changes are
nearly of the order of 50 per cent. In general we can see that the
runs that showed the most secular evolution (see AMR13) show also the largest
changes of the barlens axial ratio and of its extent relative to that of
the bar, as expected.
\color{black} {Simulation gtr111 has
two distinct time intervals in its evolution with different properties
for the barlens in each. For times up to and including 6 Gyr the
barlens is near-circular and relatively short, with axial ratios
larger than
0.9 and a length relative to the bar length of less than 0.4. It then
shows a clear change between 6 and 8 Gyr, while from 8 Gyr onward it
is considerably thinner and longer, with average axial ratio and
average relative extent of 0.75 and 0.6, respectively. It is
interesting to note that in the range between 6 and 8 Gyr
the increase of the bar strength with time shows a change of slope,
turning from a rather fast to a more moderate growth (fig. 7 of AMR13
or fig. 1 of \citealt{Iannuzzi.Athanassoula.15}). In this same time
range, the increase of the peanut strength also changes from
rather fast to more moderate \citep[fig. 2
of][]{Iannuzzi.Athanassoula.15}. This constitutes a further
argument for a strong link between the barlens and the bar. Note
that no buckling episode (i.e. no asymmetry) can be seen by eye during
this time range, or at any other time. A more in depth analysis of this
interesting behaviour is beyond the scope of this paper.}
\section{Decompositions: Technique and results}
\label{sec:decompositions}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.69]{Fig_NGC4608_gtr115_with_residual_200815.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{Fig_NGC4608_gtr115_with_residual_b.pdf}
\caption{
Images and their decompositions for the
simulation model gtr115 (upper panels), and the galaxy NGC 4608
observed in $K_s$-band (middle panels). The left-hand panels in the two
upper rows show the
images and the middle ones show the sum of the components obtained from
their decomposition. All the images are shown in face-on view and
cut so as to show only the bar and inner ring region. The right-hand
panels in the two upper rows show two dimensional representations of the
surface brightness profiles of the images (black dots), as well as
of the GALFIT decomposition models fitted for the different
structure components (red dots for the central peak component, green
for the disc,
dark blue for the bar and cyan for the barlens). The total
decomposition models are shown with light grey dots. `Bar' in the
profiles refers to the thin, elongated bar
component and `barlens' to the thick component, which is not far
from circular.
The abscissa in the right, second-row panel is given in
arcseconds. In the upper right panel the abscissa is
scaled so that the bar length is roughly the same for the galaxy and
for the simulation. The vertical black dotted lines in the profile
figures (roughly at a distance from the centre of 160 and 70
pixels for
the upper and middle panels, respectively) show the edges of the
images in the left and middle panels.
The two figures in the bottom panel show the
residuals for the simulation (left-hand panel) and for the galaxy
(right-hand panel). In the dark areas the decomposition model has higher
values than the simulation/galaxy, the opposite being true for the
white ones. Note that no spirals or
ring components were used in the decompositions, which accounts for
the white or very light grey areas in the two lower panels. The
method and the functions used for making the decompositions are
described in the text.
}
\label{fig:comp-NGC5101_gtr115}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{The components}
\label{subsec:components}
The simulation models discussed in the previous section
were decomposed into multiple structural
components, fitting the bar with two separate functions. We used
GALFIT \citep{Peng.HIR.10} with the auxiliary illustration programs
described in \cite{Salo.plus.15}, and the same approach as that used
for the observed images in the NIRS0S Atlas \citep{Laurikainen.SBKC.10}.
For the weighting of the simulation images a constant sigma-image was
used because this mimics well the typical uncertainty map for ground
based near-IR images, where the noise is dominated by the sky background.
All fitting functions have generalized elliptical isophotes
\citep{Athanassoula.MWPPLB.90}, so that:
\begin{equation}
(|x|/a)^{c} + (|y|/b)^{c}=1,
\end{equation}
\noindent where $c$ is a shape parameter and $a$ and $b$ are the major
and minor axes, respectively. We will denote their axial ratio by $q$
= $b/a$. An isophote is boxy when
its shape parameter $c > $ 2, diamond-like when $c < $ 2, and elliptical when
$c$ = 2 (see fig. 1 of \citealt{Athanassoula.MWPPLB.90}). For the radial projected surface density of the disc
component we used an exponential function:
\begin{equation}
\Sigma(r) = \Sigma_{0,d}~\exp[-(r/h_d)],
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\Sigma_{0,d}$ is the disc central surface density,
and $h_d$ is the disc radial scalelength. The thin
bar component is described for $r \le r_{out}$ by a modified Ferrers
function:
\begin{equation}
\Sigma(r) = \Sigma_{0,th}[1-(r/r_{out})^{2-\beta}]^\alpha,
\label{eq:modeif-ferrers}
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\Sigma_{0,th}$ is the central surface density of the
thin bar component, $r_{out}$ is its distance from the centre to
its outer edge, $\beta$ gives its
central slope, and $\alpha$ is a measure of the sharpness of its outer
truncation \citep{Ferrer.77}. For $r > r_{out}$ the projected
surface density is set equal to zero.
There is no preferred function for the barlens component. One
possibility is the S\'ersic function:
\begin{equation}
\Sigma(r) = \Sigma_{0,bl} ~\exp[-(r/h_{bl})^{1/n}],
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\Sigma_{0,bl}$ and $h_{bl}$ are the barlens central
surface density and its scale parameter, respectively, and $n$ the
S\'ersic index. This does not have a cut-off at some outer radius. An
alternative is to use a modified Ferrers function
(equation~\ref{eq:modeif-ferrers}) which does have a cut-off,
but is otherwise less well suited. We tried both and adopted the one
which gave a better fit for each case.
We also include in our decompositions an extra S\'ersic profile to fit the
centre-most regions where there is typically a central peak (spike) in
the surface brightness profile, which we need to account for
in order to obtain a good fit to the barlens. Such a
component is also found in observed galaxies and is accounted for in
the same
way, i.e. with a supplementary narrow S\'ersic profile. Simulations
necessarily have a softening which smooths out the central component.
However, the simulations we consider here are of high resolution, with
a softening of 50 pc. Similarly, the NIRS0S observations have a full
width half-maximum of the PSF of 1 arcsec, while for the S$^4$G
observations this is roughly 2 arcsec. For NGC 4314, shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC4314}, this gives 47 and 94 pc, for the two samples
respectively.
We thus see that the simulations and the NIRS0S
have very comparable high resolutions, while the S$^4$G sample has a
somewhat lower resolution. The above estimates
argue that, for both simulations and
observations, this spike is real but, at the risk of erring on the
side of caution, we will not discuss its parameters further here
and, unless otherwise
mentioned, none of the flux values (be they that of the barlens, thin
bar, or that of the total flux used for normalization)
include the contribution of the spike.
\begin{table}
\caption[]{Flux ratios of the barlens component as obtained from
the decompositions of snapshot images at $t$ = 6 Gyr. }
\begin{tabular}{ccrlc}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
Run & Halo & initial & F$_{bl}$/F$_{thin}$ & F$_{bl}$/F$_{tot}$ \\
& & gas [\%] & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr106 & 1: core/spherical & 20 &~~~~~2.6 & 0.33 \\
gtr111 & 1: core/spherical & 50 &~~~~~0.93 & 0.13 \\
gtr116 & 1: core/spherical & 75 & ~~~~~1.2 & 0.15 \\
gtr119 & 1: core/spherical & 100 & ~~~~~5.8 & 0.13 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr109 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 20 & ~~~~~3.1 & 0.39 \\
gtr114 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 50 & ~~~~~3.5 & 0.25 \\
gtr117 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 75 & ~~~~~0.4 & 0.26 \\
gtr120 & 2: core/mildly triaxial & 100 & ~~~~~9.5 & 0.19 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gtr110 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 20 & ~~~~~6.7 & 0.44 \\
gtr115 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 50 & ~~~~~1.9 & 0.19 \\
gtr118 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 75 & ~~~~~3.9 & 0.14 \\
gtr121 & 3: core/strongly triaxial & 100 &~~~~~~~- & 0.18 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
gcs001 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 20 & ~~~~~~~- & 0.21\\
gcs002 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 40 & ~~~~~2.9 & 0.18\\
gcs003 & 4: cusp1/spherical & 60 & ~~~~~3.5 & 0.20\\
\noalign{\smallskip}
gcs009 & 5: cusp2/spherical & 60 & ~~~~~2.3 & 0.18\\
gcs010 & 5: cusp2/spherical & 80 & ~~~~~4.4 & 0.21\\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label {tab:rdecompositions}
\end{table}
There are two important points to note in the above choices of the
components and of their properties. The first one is that we adopted
generalized ellipses, which is particularly crucial for the thin bar
and barlens components, because their isophotes do not have an
elliptical shape. The second important point is that we
describe the bar as a sum of two components. This is necessary
because, as was initially discussed by \cite{Athanassoula.05},
the shape of the bar is very complex, composed of two parts with very
different properties: an outer thin, and an inner thick component,
with different radial profiles. Such a component
does not exist in the GALFIT program, so we have to resort to using two
independent components to fit the bar adequately.
Both components are crucial for the type of work we
need to do. Note that a second component for the bar has
been introduced in
some barred galaxy decompositions already about 10 years ago
\citep{Laurikainen.SB.05}.
To our knowledge, however, it has not as yet been used for any
decompositions of simulation results.
\subsection{The fitting procedure}
\label{subsec:fit-procedure}
In our GALFIT decompositions we used the same procedure as in
observational studies \citep{Laurikainen.SBKC.10}. The bar length was set to be
the visually estimated outer edge of the bar obtained during the
ellipse fitting work (Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits}). This was
reasonable, because otherwise GALFIT would try to include the inner
ring as part of the bar. Furthermore, we fixed the barlens size and
axial ratio to the values found from the ellipse fits. After that, we
started the fitting process, iterating in order to find the appropriate
values for the remaining parameters, and making a large number of
trials until a `final' decomposition
was adopted. The choice was based on inspecting the profile fitting,
and on a comparison of the decomposition model with the original
image. Generally, it was not possible to get good fits by setting free
all parameters at once. We thus fixed some values and let GALFIT
search for the remaining. Once a reasonable value was found for one
parameter, it was fixed and others set free. These cycles were
continued until the final decomposition was reached. The number of
necessary trials varied from one image to another, but was always
large. Also the sequence in which we set the parameters free
varied from one
case to another, although we often found easiest to obtain first
reasonable values for the orientations, the fluxes and the disc scalelength.
\subsection{Results}
\label{subsec:decomp-results}
\subsubsection{Comparing decomposition results of an observed and a
simulated galaxy}
\label{subsubsec:decomp-comparisons}
Fig.~\ref{fig:comp-NGC5101_gtr115} compares the decomposition results
for NGC 4608 from the NIRS0S sample and for simulation gtr115. The left-hand
panels show the respective images and the middle ones the superposition
of the components resulting from the decompositions. This comparison is made
more quantitative in the right-panels panels, which show the radial surface
density profiles of the various components separately, as well as the
totals. Such plots are
standard in observational studies and are made so as to include
information from non-axisymmetric 2D decompositions in radial
profiles. Every black point is a pixel from the image and every red
(green, dark blue and cyan) point is a pixel from the central peak
component (disc, bar
and barlens component, respectively). Thus this plot can be seen as a
sequence of radial surface density profiles for each component
separately, the total model and the image. From all these plots we can
see that the simulation snapshot describes NGC 4608 quite
successfully, even
though it was not made specifically for that purpose but is just a
closely resembling snapshot from the AMR13 sample.
\color{black} {The lower panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:comp-NGC5101_gtr115} present
the residual maps, which can attest to the quality of the
decomposition in the relevant area. In our decomposition the disc
model is axisymmetric, so the minima on the direction of the bar minor
axis above and below the bar, seen both in the observed and the
simulated galaxy, can not
be accounted for. This leads to the dark areas in these regions.
Furthermore, no spiral or ring component
was included in the decomposition, since this is not the object of our
study. This explains the residuals outside the bar region where such
components are present in the simulation and galaxy. Note also that
the spirals in the outer parts of the
simulation are not present in the galaxy image.
This can be understood because the simulation
has at the time of the comparison still nearly 6\% of its baryons in
the form of gas, which NGC 4608, being a SB0 without HI detection,
does not have. Thus we can conclude that the decomposition is
satisfactory in the bar region under study, but further
components need to be introduced in order to get a better model for the whole
galaxy.}
\begin{table}
\caption[]{Time evolution of the relative flux of the
barlens component, as obtained from decompositions of the
simulation images. }
\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
Age -$>$ & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
(Gyr) & & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
{\it gtr111:}& & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
F$_{bl}$/F$_{thin}$ &0.44 &0.81 &0.95 &- &2.35 &1.39 & 1.36\\
F$_{bl}$/F$_{tot}$ &0.03 &0.08 &0.13 &- &0.22 &0.20 &0.21 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
{\it gtr119:} & & & & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
F$_{bl}$/F$_{thin}$ &6.16 &6.28 &5.81 &2.87 &2.53 &1.79 &1.79 \\
F$_{bl}$/F$_{tot}$ &0.11 &0.16 &0.16 &0.16 &0.17 & 0.20& 0.20\\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\end{tabular}
\label {tab:tdecompositions}
\end{table}
\subsubsection{Decomposition results for a number of simulations and times}
\label{subsubsec:decomp-results}
In Tables \ref{tab:rdecompositions} and \ref{tab:tdecompositions}
we give the decomposition results for the flux ratios of all our
models. The former has the
same layout as Table \ref{tab:rellipsefits}, except that in the fourth
column we give the values of the barlens fluxes, F$_{bl}$, normalized
to the flux of the thin bar component, F$_{thin}$, and in the
fifth one the same quantity, now normalized to the total flux of the
galaxy, F$_{tot}$. Table~\ref{tab:tdecompositions} has a layout
similar to that of
Table~\ref{tab:tellipsefits}, but gives information on the barlens flux
normalized by the flux of the thin bar component (upper line
for each simulation), and by the total flux (lower line).
For simulations with no gas initially, e.g. gtr101,
gtr102, gtr003 and gcs006, it is unclear whether
a two bar component fit is necessary and decompositions with
a single bar component can not be excluded. We therefore do not
include these simulations in Tables \ref{tab:rdecompositions} and
\ref{tab:tdecompositions}.
There are also decomposition difficulties
for snapshots at the other extreme of the gas
fraction, e.g. for gtr121, where the thin bar component is too weak
and short to allow a reliable decomposition. Simulation gtr117 was also difficult
to decompose and the values given are not as reliable as those of
other simulations. The cases
which are difficult to decompose presented also difficulties in the
ellipse fits. We will therefore single them out, or omit them from
many of the following
discussions, since the results, if at all available, are less reliable
than those of the remaining runs.
In cases where
the thin bar component is very short and difficult to discern,
the F$_{bl}$/F$_{thin}$ takes very large values, but these are very
unsafe because of the large uncertainties for F$_{thin}$. They
should thus be used only with caution. This is presumably
the case e.g. for the three earlier times of gtr119 in
Table~\ref{tab:tdecompositions}.
For such cases, but also more generally, the
F$_{bl}$/F$_{tot}$ values are much safer to use.
\subsubsection{Decomposition tests}
\label{subsubsec:test-decomp}
\begin{table}
\caption[]{The effect of the viewing angle on the
properties of barlenses for the simulation model gtr111 at time $t$=6
Gyr
}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
Bar position & inclination & b/a & F$_{bl}$/F$_{thin}$ & F$_{bl}$/F$_{tot}$ \\
angle & & & & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
00 &00 &0.96 &0.95 &0.130 \\
00 &30 &0.77 &0.95 &0.110 \\
30 &30 &0.80 &0.99 &0.116 \\
60 &30 &0.75 &1.30 &0.135 \\
00 &60 & 0.64&0.50 &0.054 \\
30 &60 &0.78 &0.79 &0.089 \\
60 &60 &0.66 &0.31 & 0.058\\
90 &60 &0.86 &1.07 &0.118 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:view-decomp}
\end{table}
We have so far considered only face-on views
with the bar major axis along the $x$ axis. Here we will present
decomposition results for different viewing angles.
For this we used simulation gtr111 at $t$=6 Gyr, whose barlens is
near-circular, with an axial ratio of 0.96.
We viewed the snapshot after a rotation in the disc plane, to put the
bar major axis at a different angles with respect to the galaxy major
axis. We then inclined it by another angle. The results are
given in Table~\ref{tab:view-decomp}. The first two columns give the
viewing angles, the third one gives the axial ratio of the barlens
component as obtained from the ellipse fits and the last two give the
relative barlens fluxes.
The results for the face-on view are given in the first row, and
examples with 30$^{\circ}$ inclination in the next three rows. The errors
are of the order of 10--20 per cent, i.e. sufficiently small to
allow considerable analysis and statistics.
If, however, we consider inclinations as high as 60$^{\circ}$ (four
last lines of Table~\ref{tab:view-decomp}), the
errors are higher. This argues that for some statistical
work involving barlenses it may be necessary to introduce a lower
inclination
cut-off than the commonly used 60$^{\circ}$ or 65$^{\circ}$.
How much the results are affected by a given inclination should
vary from one case to another and should in particular depend on the
extent of the barlens above and below the equatorial plane.
\section{Discussion}
\label{sec:discussion}
\subsection{Range of values for the barlens relative lengths and axial ratios}
\label{subsec:lengthrat-axrat}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{Fig_histo_q_barlens_Lia.jpg}
\caption{Number histogram of the minor-to-major
axis ratios of barlenses in the NIRS0S Atlas. The full black line
shows the measurements in the disc
plain, and the dashed line the same galaxies in
the sky-plane.The arrows mark
the minimum and maximum of this parameter for our simulation models (in
the plane of the disc).}
\label{fig:qbarlens}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{Fig_histo_LblLbar_Lia.jpg}
\vskip 30pt
\caption{Number histogram of the sizes of barlenses for the galaxies
in the NIRS0S Atlas, normalized to the corresponding
bar length. The black full line shows the measurements in the disc
plain, and the (red online) dashed line the same galaxies in
the sky-plane.
The arrows indicate the minimum and maximum of the same parameter in
our simulation models (in the disc plane). The sizes of structures
are measured in a similar manner for the simulation models and for
the observed galaxies.
}
\label{fig:histoLb}
\end{figure}
Let us now compare the range of values for the axial ratios of the
barlens components in observations and in simulations. The former can
be found for all galaxies with a barlens component in Table 5 of
\cite{Laurikainen.SBK.11} and their histogram is plotted here in
Fig.~\ref{fig:qbarlens}, both in the sky-plane and in the galactic
disc plane (assuming thin
structures). The ellipticities for the simulations have been obtained
from the ellipse fits described in Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits}. These
simulations, however, were made in order to understand the effect of
gas and of the dark matter halo on bar formation and evolution
(Sect.~\ref{sec:simulations}) and
do not necessarily cover the parameter space in the same way as the
barred galaxies in NIRS0S. Furthermore the deprojection of
observed galaxies, particularly barred, always entails some
uncertainty. It is thus more meaningful to compare the range of
allowed values than the distribution of values given by the whole histogram.
We find that the range of ellipticities obtained for barlenses in our
simulation models (marked with arrows) fits well the range
defined by the observations. Furthermore, barlens ellipticities of the
gtr models with initial gas fractions of 0.5, 0.75 or 1.00,
are within the range of 0.7--1.0, where most of the observed
ellipticities are found.
The distribution of barlens sizes, normalized to the
bar length, as obtained from the NIRS0S sample, are shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:histoLb}, again given separately for the disc and the
sky planes. In the comparison with simulations we omitted gcs006,
because its measurements are much less reliable than those of the
other simulations (see Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits} and
\ref{sec:decompositions}). Fig.~\ref{fig:histoLb} shows clearly the
comparison of the range of
values obtained from simulations to the range of observed ones
is most satisfactory.
\subsection{Comparing the face-on and the side-on views}
\label{subsec:sideon}
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gcs001_6-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gtr116_6-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gtr116_6_45-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\caption{The left-hand and middle columns show grey-scale plots and
isodensities of three views of simulation gcs001
(left) and gtr116 (middle), both at $t$=6 Gyr. In the
lowest sub-panels the simulations are viewed face-on, in the top ones
side-on and in the central ones at $45^{\circ}$. The grey-scale levels
are logarithmically spaced and the isodensities are at levels
chosen to show best given morphological features discussed in the
text. The vertical solid lines extending through all three
sub-panels show the extent of the barlens component in all
three views,
as measured by the ellipse fits (Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits}).
The vertical dashed lines show the extent of the B/P/X bulge. The
right-hand column illustrates again gtr116, but now with the bar at
45$^\circ$ from the line of nodes. In
the upper left corner of each sub-panel we give the simulation
name and snapshot time in Gyr and in
the upper right one the viewing inclination angle in degrees.
}
\label{fig:many-views}
\end{figure*}
Simulations have an important advantage over observations in that they
allow the viewing of an object from any desired viewing angle. We will
use this here in order to study the 3D structure of the barlens
component. In the left-hand and middle panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:many-views}
we show two snapshots viewed
from three different angles. The snapshots correspond to the disc
component of simulations gtr116 and gcs001, both at $t$=6 Gyr.
In the lower sub-panels they are viewed face-on
and in the upper ones edge-on. The central sub-panels correspond to an
intermediate viewing angle of $45^{\circ}$. In both cases the bar is
oriented along the $x$ axis, to facilitate comparisons. These two
snapshots were chosen because
they are good examples of specific morphological features which we
wish to discuss here.
The face-on and intermediate views in Fig.~\ref{fig:many-views} show
that the edge of the barlens component at and around the direction of
the bar minor axis is relatively sharply defined, as witnessed by the
crowding
of the isodensities in that region, arguing for a correspondingly
sharp decrease of the barlens density profile. This is in
good agreement with the strong decrease of the surface density in the
barlens region seen on the minor axis profiles in
Fig. \ref{fig:comp-morpho}.
In contrast, the only crowding of isodensities in the direction of the
bar major axis is at the end of the bar. No corresponding feature is
seen at the end of the barlens, in good agreement with
Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC5101_gtr115_prof}
and the corresponding discussion at the end of
Sect.~\ref{sec:global}.
A further interesting point to note is the difference that the
inclination makes to the shapes of both the thin bar component and
the barlens. This can be clearly seen by comparing the shape of the
isodensities in the face-on and the intermediate view. In the face-on
view, the thickness of the bar along the direction of its minor axis
has a maximum at $x$=0, then decreases with increasing
distance from the centre to reach a minimum before increasing
again in the region of the ansae. For example for gcs001 at $t$=6 Gyr
(left-hand panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:many-views}), the
minimum thickness of the projected surface density isocontours occurs
somewhere
around 4 kpc from the centre (measured along the bar major axis). Then the bar
outline starts becoming thicker again.
Such a minimum is not visible in the intermediate view (inclination angle of
$45^{\circ}$), where the barlens isophotes near the bar minor axis
are flat, presumably due to the projected contribution
of the B/P bulge which extends more than a kpc above the
equatorial plane. Similar results can be seen in the middle panel for
gtr116 at $t$=6 Gyr.
The solid vertical lines extending through all three sub-panels show
the extent of the barlens along the bar major axis,
as measured from the ellipse fits (Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits}).
There are also vertical dotted lines, which show the
horizontal extent of the B/P bulge as estimated from the
side-on view. Comparing their locations to that of the solid lines
it is clear that the end of the barlens coincides, to within the
estimation
accuracy, with the end of the B/P bulge. In fact in some
cases, as e.g. gcs001 at $t$=6 Gyr (left-hand panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig:many-views}), the two estimates coincide to within the
thickness of the lines in the plot, so that no dotted line can be
seen. We repeated this
exercise for a number of snapshots (simulations and times) and always
found the same qualitative result. For the ratios of the extent of the
barlens to that of the B/P bulge we found a median of 0.96, a
mean of 0.97 and an absolute deviation of 0.14, which argues that the
barlens and the B/P extent are equal to within the measuring errors.
This strongly argues that the
barlens and the boxy/peanut bulge are one and the same component, and
not two separate components, or two separate parts of the bar. They
are simply viewed from a different viewing angle, near face-on for the
barlens and near edge-on for the B/P/X bulge. One would then expect
that the fraction of observed galaxies having either a
barlens or a B/P/X should be independent of the viewing angle, and this
is indeed what we found and reported in the accompanying observational
paper (L+14).
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.4, angle=0]{n936-gtr116-stars-v1c.jpg}
\caption{Comparison of a simulation snapshot (right-hand panel) with an
SDSS image of NGC 936 (Hogg, Blanton and the SDSS collaboration,
as in the Near Extragalactic Database). Note the resemblance
between the two morphologies in the bar region. The simulation
has, by construction, no classical bulge component, the
inner component being a barlens when viewed face-on and a
B/P/X bulge when seen edge-on. We discuss the implication of
this comparison in Sect.~\ref{subsec:NGC936}.
}
\label{fig:NGC936}
\end{figure*}
We thus confirm that, as argued by \cite{Athanassoula.05}, bars are
composed of two parts, an outer one
being both vertically and horizontally thin, so that it can be called
the thin bar component, and an inner one which is vertically thick and
also fatter in the
equatorial plane. This can be called the thick part of the bar, or the
B/P/X bulge, or the barlens; all three names describing the same part
of the bar.
Our plots allowed us to obtain a rule of thumb that can give us
information on the extent of the B/P/X/barlens component when the
galaxy is viewed
near-face-on. Indeed, as already mentioned, the shape of the
isophotes in the barlens region is very different from that in the
thin bar part. This makes the isophotes change curvature, from
orienting their concave part towards the bar major axis to being rather
flat, or orienting their convex part towards the bar major axis. The
point or region where this change of curvature occurs gives a good
estimate of the length of the barlens component. When applying this
rule of thumb, it is also
recommended to use several isodensity contours, since some show this
minimum or flattening clearer than others.
This rule of thumb
works well near the face-on geometry, but it needs to be
extended to be applicable to inclination angles up to say
45$^{\circ}$. Fig.~\ref{fig:many-views} shows that for such
inclinations and when the bar is near the line of nodes, the
isodensities near the bar minor axis are not curved
as for the face-on view, but flat (straight). Thus
the bar isodensities have two flat sections, both roughly parallel to
the bar major axis. The location where any one of these two sections joins
the part of the isodensity that orients its concave part towards the
bar major axis is the
end of the barlens. As before, it is more reliable to use a number of
isophotes. It is not necessary to extend this rule of thumb to
yet higher inclinations (i.e. nearer to edge-on) because there the
vertical extent of the barlens makes it anyway easier to
find its radial
extent \citep{Athanassoula.Beaton.06, Erwin.Debattista.13}.
We checked our rule of thumb by applying it to a number of snapshots
seen from different viewing angles, and found that it fares very well
for most morphologies,
particularly after one's eye has gained some expertise in detecting the
correct features. There may, nevertheless, be some bar morphologies to
which it can not be applied, such as relatively fat bars with
near-elliptical isodensities. Our rule of thumb
is of course rather crude, but certainly safer than using a constant
value for the ratio of the bar and barlens extents, as has been previously
proposed, because as we saw in Sect.~\ref{subsec:lengthrat-axrat} and
will further discuss in Sect.~\ref{subsec:orbits} the
ratio of these two extents covers a wide range of values both in the
observations and in the simulations.
\subsection{Can some barlenses be partly or fully mistaken for classical bulges?}
\label{subsec:NGC936}
In Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC936} we view a further comparison between simulations
and observations. The left-hand panel shows an image of the barred galaxy
NGC 936, obtained by combining the g, r and i images from the SDSS. The
right-hand panel displays
gtr116 at time $t$ = 6 Gyr, viewed from angles such
that it mimics best NGC 936. This simulation was not
specifically run so as to model NGC 936, yet the bar regions in the
observations and in the simulations have a very similar
morphology. The most important thing to note, however, is that this
simple visual inspection of the central
region of both NGC 936 and the simulation could lead to the conclusion
that both have a classical bulge, while at least for the simulation we
are sure, by construction, that it has no such component.
This shows that a barlens component may be mistaken
for a classical bulge, if morphology is the only available information.
Could photometry reveal whether the inner component is a barlens or a
classical bulge? Fig.
\ref{fig:NGC5101_gtr115_prof} shows that, both
in observations and in simulations, barlenses can produce a clear
central peak in the radial luminosity profile. This, however, is less
sharp than that of a classical bulge, and quantitative measurements of
the S\'ersic index should be able to distinguish between the two, since the
standard value for a classical bulge is larger than 2 or 2.5
(\citealt{Kormendy.Kennicutt.04}, \citealt{Drory.Fisher.07,
Fisher.Drory.08}), while that of the barlens is considerably smaller (L+14).
Thus, the answer to our initial question is that accurate
photometry should most probably be able to distinguish between a
classical bulge and a barlens component.
Could colours, or population synthesis help us distinguish between
these two types of components? Indeed, B/P/X bulges are
formed from the vertical instabilities of the bar, i.e. such bulges
are constituted of stars initially in the disc. In contrast, the most
standard formation
mechanism of classical bulges is from mergings occurring early on in
the galaxy formation process, before the formation of the thin disc.
Thus if the inner component is composed of stars that are older and
redder than the disc or bar, then
it would be a classical bulge and not a barlens. This colour
difference, however, is not a
necessary condition, since classical bulges can also form from later
occurring minor mergers or they may have later gas accretion
\citep[e.g.][]{Aguerri.BP.01, Coelho.Gadotti.11}, in which cases their
stellar populations
could be younger and bluer than the disc, or they could include a
younger sub-population. Thus, in some cases it may be possible to
distinguish classical bulges from barlenses by their colours or with
the help of population synthesis, but in others not.
Orbits in barlenses are very different from those in classical bulges,
so detailed kinematic observations could be very helpful in
distinguishing between the two types of components.
Specifically for NGC 936, signatures of kinematics which are not
compatible with pure classical bulges have been discussed by
\cite{Kormendy.83, Kormendy.84, Kent.Glaudel.89} and Cappellari (2013,
private communication, see
www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2013/MORPH/Videos/Day-4/morph2013$_{}$Athanassoula.mp4;
see also \citealt{Cappellari.p.11} and \citealt{Cappellari.p.13}).
Unfortunately though, such detailed kinematics are available only for
relatively few galaxies\footnote{Three more near-face-on galaxies with B/P/X
bulges have been observed by \cite{Mendez.ACDDRAP.08} and
more are included in the SAURON and ATLAS3D samples.}.
All the above argue that, for galaxies which are seen near to face-on
and for which neither
detailed kinematics nor photometry are available, barlenses could
be mistaken for classical bulges. The picture is yet more
complex because B/P/X/bl components and classical bulges
can well coexist in galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{Athanassoula.05,
Kormendy.Barentine.10, Nowak.TESBD.10, Mendez.ADCA.14, Erwin.plus.15}. In such
cases, as discussed in
the accompanying observational paper (L+14),
decompositions with only three components -- a disc, a classical bulge
and a bar -- will overestimate the bulge mass to try and compensate
for the omitted barlens. This effect can be very important (on average
a factor of 3.5) as could be
expected since the barlens can constitute a considerable part of the
total mass, as shown here for simulations (see Tables
\ref{tab:rdecompositions} and \ref{tab:tdecompositions},
and Sect.~\ref{subsec:trends}) and in (L+14) for observations.
Mistaking a barlens, or part thereof, for a classical bulge can have
repercussions for studies of individual galaxies. For example, in
order to calculate potentials and forces within a barred galaxy in view of
studying its orbital structure or the gas flow in it, we need first to
obtain the volume density from the projected surface density. Here the
difference
between the vertical distribution of mass in barlenses and in classical bulges
can make non-negligible differences in the results. Similarly, it can
affect the calculation of the $Q_b$ measure of the bar strength.
Moreover, such mistakes may bias statistical studies involving
galaxy classifications, and erroneously move galaxies
towards earlier types.
It is clear that the
result of such misclassifications is a bias and not a statistical error,
so that the correct fraction of disc galaxies with no
classical bulge is in reality larger than so far estimated, and the
contribution of classical bulges to the total baryonic mass budget considerably
less. This is in good agreement with recent detailed studies which
have argued that also in our Galaxy \citep{Shen.RKHDK.10, Ness.p.13a,
Ness.p.13b}, as well as in a number of nearby
Sc - Scd galaxies \citep{Kormendy.DBC.10} the classical
bulge component is either non-existent or very small. Here we extend
this statement to early type barred galaxies.
A smaller contribution of classical bulges to the total baryonic mass
fraction and a larger number of disc galaxies with no classical bulge
are facts that future galaxy formation theories will
have to take into account.
\subsection{Trends}
\label{subsec:trends}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[scale=0.65, angle=-90]{pl_eija2_paper_2015-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\caption{Evolutionary trends of barlens parameters. We display barlens axial ratio
(upper panel) and barlens flux normalized by the total flux
(lower panel), both as a function of bar strength. Data from
gtr111 are plotted with open squares and data from gtr119 by open
triangles. As the bar strength increases with time, so does the
relative importance of the barlens, amounting to a bigger
fraction of the total baryonic mass. The solid line is the regression
line obtained from the observations (L+14).
For more information see Sect.~\ref{subsec:trends}.
}
\label{fig:trends}
\end{figure}
In this section we will use the data we obtained in
Sects.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits} and
\ref{sec:decompositions} to follow the temporal
evolution of the barlens properties. In
principle we could also check the effect of the gas fraction on the
barlens, but such information is more difficult to
interpret. Indeed at any given time the different simulations are at
different stage of evolution, because the bar formation time
depends on the gas fraction (AMR13).
In Fig.~\ref{fig:trends} we show the evolution of barlens properties
as a function of time for simulations gtr111 and gtr119. In order to
allow comparisons with observations we display all quantities as a
function of bar strength, which is an observable
quantity.
How the bar strength increases with time depends strongly both on the
fraction of gas in the disc component and on the halo triaxiality,
being the strongest for simulations with no gas and a spherical halo,
and weakest for simulations with a high gas fraction and a high halo
triaxiality (AMR13). Thus, although the
bar strength is not, strictly speaking, a substitute for time, it
is a monotonically (though not linearly) increasing function of
time\footnote{This is true for the times
in which our analysis is made, which are
after peanut formation, i.e. in the secular evolution phase. At
earlier times and particularly during a buckling, the bar strength is
not a monotonic function of time \citep[see][for
reviews]{Athanassoula.13, Athanassoula.15}. See also
the discussion in Sect.~\ref{subsec:orbits}.}. The bar strength was
calculated in AMR13, from the maximum of the relative $m$=2
Fourier component.
The upper panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:trends} shows the barlens axial
ratio -- obtained from the
ellipse fits described in Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits} (Table
\ref{tab:tellipsefits}) -- as a function of the bar strength. No trend
is visible for either gtr111 or gtr119. On the contrary, gtr101, a
gas-less simulation with a spherical halo, has a very strong bar and
shows a trend, with the barlens becoming more elongated with time (not
shown here, but see values in Table~\ref{tab:tellipsefits}). However, as we
already stated, barlenses in gas-less
simulations are less realistic than those in the remaining runs, and
only few galaxies have such elongated barlens shapes (see also
Sect.~\ref{subsec:lengthrat-axrat}). For gtr111 and gtr119 there is no
trend and the axial ratio values are in the range of 0.65 to 0.95,
in good agreement with the observations (Fig.~\ref{fig:qbarlens}).
Thus our simulations argue that there should be no
clear evolution of the barlens shape, except perhaps for the strongest
bars.
The lower panel shows the flux of the barlens component normalized
by the total flux, as a function of bar strength.
Simulations gtr111 and gtr119 show a clear evolution of their bar
strength (AMR13) as well as of their relative barlens flux, such that there is
a clear trend between these two quantities. Each
simulation separately gives a much tighter fit to a straight line than
the two together,
because the points from the more gas-rich simulation (gtr119) are
displaced above those of gtr111. Furthermore, the slopes show that the
evolution of the barlens is stronger for the galaxy with less gas
(gtr111). We have thus shown that the fraction of the total baryonic mass
which is included in the barlens component increases noticeably with time, more
so in gas-poor cases.
This global increase with time can be understood from the general growth
of the bar during the secular evolution phase \citep[][for a
review]{Athanassoula.13}, which, as we show here, is followed by an increase of
the mass of its barlens component, in good agreement with the known
correlation between bar and peanut strength \citep{Athanassoula.08}.
Furthermore, the fact that the evolution for the gas poor simulation is
stronger than for the gas-rich one is also in agreement with the results of
AMR13, where bars in gas-poor discs were shown to evolve faster than bars
in gas-rich discs.
Should we expect our predicted trends to be verified by observed galaxies?
This is well possible, but not necessary. It should not
be forgotten that observations may contain a much more diverse
set of galaxy parameters than our models, with different
masses, different disc velocity dispersions, cases with and without
classical bulges, and/or a wider variety of halo mass distributions,
etc, which could `dilute' trends. Furthermore, simulations may
cover parts of parameter space which are not relevant to real
galaxies, e.g. have more extreme gas fractions or different halo shapes.
The above
question -- i.e. whether real galaxies verify our predicted trends -- was
answered in the accompanying observational paper (L+14)
using a selected sub-sample of 10--15
galaxies from the NIRS0S and S$^4$G samples. These show no
trend for the barlens axial ratios and a very clear trend for the
barlens relative flux. It is gratifying to note
that these observational results confirm our predictions.
To extend the comparison further, we plotted the regression line from
L+14
in the lower panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig:trends}. This fits very well the data from gtr111, while
those of gtr119 trace a line of a somewhat smaller slope, and displaced
upwards. This shows that gtr111 represents better the observations
than gtr119. The main difference between the initial conditions of
these two simulations is the fraction of gas in the disc component,
which in the beginning of the simulation is 100\% for gtr119 and 50\%
for gtr111. Indeed it is more realistic to assume that at the time
when the disc got in place the gas fraction in it was of the
order of 50\% rather than 100\% \citep[e.g.][and references
therein]{Genzel.p.14}.
\subsection{Barlens formation}
\label{formation}
\begin{figure*}
\includegraphics[scale=0.46, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gtr111_35_x5-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.46, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gtr111_4_x5-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.46, angle=-90]{disk,stars_gtr111_6_x5-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\caption{Grey-scale plots and isodensities of face-on (lower panels)
and edge-on (upper panels) views of simulation gtr111. From left
to right the corresponding times are 3.5, 4 and 6 Gyr. The
grey-scale levels
are logarithmically spaced and the isodensities are at levels
chosen to show best given morphological features discussed in the
text. In the upper left corner
of each sub-panel we give the simulation name and snapshot time and in
the upper right one the viewing inclination angle in degrees. Note
that in the rightmost panel the linear scale is different from
that of the other two panels, so as to follow
the growth of the bar.
}
\label{fig:early-times2}
\end{figure*}
We have argued that barlenses are simply the B/P/X component viewed
face-on. A corollary to this would be that there are no barlenses in
cases with no B/P/X. Is this indeed the case in our simulations?
To address this, we carefully examined our
simulations before the B/P/X formed. Let us first note that for
many simulations it
is difficult to give precisely the time of B/P/X formation and that
errors of at least 0.5 Gyr and often considerably larger should be
expected. With that proviso let us look at a typical case in
Fig.~\ref{fig:early-times2}. Simulation gtr111 has initially 50\% of
its baryons in the form of gas and the evolution of its bar strength and
B/P/X strength with time are given in figs 1 and 2 of
\cite{Iannuzzi.Athanassoula.15}, respectively. In particular, these
figures show
that the peanut starts growing shortly after $t$=4 Gyr, with a
best estimate of $t$=4.5 Gyr. Thus the right-hand panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig:early-times2}, at $t$=6 Gyr is well after the time when
the B/P/X started growing, as is asserted also by
the corresponding upper subpanel, where the peanut structure is clear. At
this time the face-on view (lower subpanel of the right-hand column)
clearly displays a barlens component. At $t$=3.5 Gyr (left-hand column),
i.e. before the B/P/X started growing,
this simulation shows no barlens component, while at $t$=4 (middle
panel) -- i.e. roughly at the moment where
the B/P/X starts growing, or slightly before it -- we see that the
barlens starts becoming visible.
This and other examples from our simulations argue that, at least for
the models that we have
analysed here, the barlens and the B/P/X grow roughly concurrently, but
shifts of the order of half or one Gyr can not be excluded. Early on,
at times when the B/P/X has clearly not started growing, no barlens is
visible in the simulations. This means that some of the observed bars,
the relatively youngest ones, will not have a barlens component, in good
agreement with the observation result of \cite{Laurikainen.SABBJ.13},
who found that not all barred galaxies have barlenses. Furthermore, it
argues that all
galaxies with a barlens component must be in their secular evolution
phase.
\subsection{The orbital structure of barlenses}
\label{subsec:orbits}
The first step to understanding the dynamics of any substructure is
to study the
orbits that constitute it. No specific study of orbits in barlenses has
so far been made, but since these structures are the face-on view of the
B/P/X bulges, as we argued in this paper, the orbital
structure of the latter (discussed e.g. by \citealt{Pfenniger.84,
Patsis.SA.02}, \citealt{Skokos.PA.02a} and
\citealt{Patsis.Katsanikas.14}; see also \citealt{Athanassoula.15} for
a review) should provide the necessary information. The most likely
building blocks for our case and
the most widely discussed in the literature, will then be 3D families of
periodic orbits of the $x_1$ tree which bifurcate from the vertical
resonances of the 2D $x_1$ family and have stable parts of a
sufficiently large extent. The families that
bifurcate at the lowest energies -- such as $x_1v_1$, $x_1v_3$,
$x_1v_4$, or $x_1v_5$ -- are the
most likely candidates, since the outline of orbits from higher order
bifurcating families are less vertically extended and more extended
along the bar major axis,
and thus less appropriate building blocks. An alternative would be the
$z3.1s$ family \citep{Skokos.PA.02b}, whose orbits have a morphology
similar to that of the $x_1v_4$ family but is not related to
the $x_1$ tree. This, however, would be suitable
only in specific models, while B/P/X bulges are more generally found
in barred models. This alternative is therefore not very likely and we
will not consider it further here.
\begin{figure}
\center
\includegraphics[scale=0.3, angle=-90]{histo_pob_Lia_Eija_paper-eps-converted-to.pdf}
\caption{
Histogram of the ratio of the extent of the barlens to that of the
thin part of the bar. The solid line gives the histogram for the
extent ratios given in Table~\ref{tab:rellipsefits}, i.e. using the
same method as previously used for the NIRS0S observations, while the
dashed line gives the
histogram of the same quantity, but with measurements obtained from
the face-on and side-on isodensity curves, as described in
Sect.~\ref{subsec:sideon}.
}
\label{fig:ratbl-histo}
\end{figure}
As mentioned above, orbits from families bifurcating from the $x_1$ at
low energies (low values of the Jacobi constant) are less extended along the
bar major axis compared to the thin part of the
bar than orbits from higher order families. Thus, by comparing the
horizontal extent of the barlens to that of the thin bar component,
we should in principle be able to deduce which vertical resonance is
the main contributor to the barlens and where it is located. In
practice, however, this is not easy because the relative extent of the
orbits of various families is model dependent. In
Table~\ref{tab:rellipsefits} we gave values for the ratio of the
barlens extent to that of the thin bar component for the $t$=6 Gyr
snapshots of all simulations discussed here and in
Fig.~\ref{fig:ratbl-histo} we give a histogram of these values (solid
line). As already mentioned in Sect.~\ref{subsec:lengthrat-axrat},
all but one of the snapshots have extent ratios within the range
defined by the NIRS0S observations. The exception is gcs006, whose
measurement, as discussed in Sect.~\ref{subsec:ell-results}, is not
as reliable as the rest.
Our next step will be to compare the values of the extent ratios with
the corresponding numbers found from orbital structure work. In
particular we want to compare them with the corresponding numbers in
tables 1 to 6 of \cite{Patsis.SA.02}. These set rough limits to the
extent ratios depending on the main family that constitutes the barlens. For
example for $x_1v_1$ the ratio of barlens to bar extent should be less
than 0.5, while for the other families it should be larger than 0.6 and
less than 1. As we will discuss below, there is always some uncertainty
in these numbers, because the orbits were calculated in a fiducial
potential and not in the potential of each given galaxy and, furthermore,
the measurements of the barlens and bar extent always have some
measuring error.
Fig.~\ref{fig:ratbl-histo} shows that, making a
conservative estimate of a 10\% global uncertainty, only 3 out
of 18 models have L(bl) / L(bar) which is not compatible with the
$x_1v_1$ family. The three exceptions are gtr101, gtr117 and gcs006,
which have extent ratios of 0.77, 0.81 and 0.94, respectively. Note
that the measurements given for these three cases are less reliable
than the remaining ones, as discussed in Sect.~\ref{subsec:ell-results}
and \ref{subsubsec:decomp-results}. Thus, our results indicate that in
about 83\% of our simulations, and perhaps more, the $x_1v_1$ family
can be
the backbone of the B/P/X/bl component. This number is not in good
agreement with the NIRS0S results, where this fraction is lowered to
about 54\%. The disagreement is not surprising. As already mentioned,
our simulations covered the gas fraction and halo shape parameter
space homogeneously, so as to better explain their effect on bar
formation and evolution. They did not attempt to model specific
galaxies, nor did they attempt to follow their distributions in
parameter space. Thus the
distribution of any result, such as the extent ratios, can not be
expected to be similar in observations and in simulations. There is,
nevertheless, good agreement between the two because
the ranges of values covered by observations and simulations are in
good agreement, as we already showed in Sect.~\ref{subsec:lengthrat-axrat}.
In Sect.~\ref{subsec:sideon} we used the isodensity curves in the
side-on view to measure the B/P extent, and found that the results
agreed very well with those obtained for the barlens from the face-on view
given in Sect. \ref{sec:ellipsefits}. Similarly, the extent of the bar
can be measured from the isodensity curves in the face-on view. We
compared the latter
results with the bar length measurements obtained with the method used in
the NIRS0S analysis (see Sect.~\ref{sec:ellipsefits}) and found
differences. These differences are not due to different personal
appreciation, but are systematic, due to differences between methods.
Indeed the isodensity method places the end of the bar further out than
the ridge line of the ring. The median value of the ratio of the
bar length as obtained with the NIRS0S rule to that obtained from the
isodensity shapes is 0.86, and the mean 0.87, with an absolute
deviation of 0.11. We then calculated the ratios of barlens extent to
bar length using for both quantities the values obtained by the
isodensities and
plot the result in Fig.~\ref{fig:ratbl-histo} (dashed line). As
expected, the values of the extent ratios are smaller, so the histogram is somewhat
shifted. Now only two simulations have a ratio beyond 0.6, namely
gtr101 and gcs006, with ratios 0.62 and 0.73, respectively. These
two simulations have no gas and their measurements are less accurate
than those of the rest. We may thus conclude that a very large fraction,
if not all the simulations could have a B/P/X/bl feature compatible
with the $x_1v_1$ family.
Some care, however, has to be taken when using results from orbital
structure theory to make detailed quantitative comparisons with
observations. Bars have a very complex morphology and
geometry and, as a result, their potential has not been yet adequately
modelled analytically. The most realistic of the existing
analytic models, the Ferrers models \citep{Ferrer.77}, have an
ellipsoidal face-on shape, which is not a good description of the real bar
shape \citep{Athanassoula.MWPPLB.90, Gadotti.09, Gadotti.11}, and,
viewed edge-on, do not have a B/P/X. Yet, for lack of any
better potential/density model,
Ferrers models have been used in most orbital structure
studies of the barlens/bar/bulge region \citep[e.g.][]{Athanassoula.BMP.83,
Papayannopoulos.Petrou.83, Pfenniger.84, Athanassoula.92, Skokos.PA.02a,
Skokos.PA.02b, Patsis.05}. The main qualitative results of
these studies should be applicable to real galaxies, but at
least some of their quantitative results may not be sufficiently
accurate for detailed comparisons with observations. It would
therefore be highly desirable to find analytic galactic potentials
that take into account both the 3D shape of the B/P/X/barlens
component and
the rectangularity of the thin bar component, in order to make yet
more realistic orbital structure studies.
\cite{Skokos.PA.02a} noted that the $(x,y)$ projections of the 3D
families of the $x_1$-tree, i.e. the $x_1v_n, n=1,2,3,..$ families, retain a
morphological similarity with the parent $x_1$ family at the same
energy, in particular in regions relatively near the
bifurcating points. This could, at first sight, have been
considered to disagree with the fact that the face-on outlines of the
barlens are very different from that of the thin bar components, and
thus argue against
the barlens picture that we propose here. It must, however, be kept in
mind that the orbital structure study of \cite{Skokos.PA.02a}, like
those of all other such studies, is carried out using Ferrers
potentials and does not include the potential of a separate barlens
components. This is a further argument underlining the necessity of
orbital structure studies using yet more realistic potentials.
\subsection{Discy bulges}
\label{discy}
We have so far discussed at length the links between B/P/X bulges
and barlenses and also mentioned tentatively that, if no appropriate
kinematic or photometric data are available, barlenses could be confused
with classical bulges. There is, however, yet another type of bulges
which we have not discussed yet,
namely discy pseudo-bulges \citep{Kormendy.Kennicutt.04,
Athanassoula.05, Erwin.08}. These have the shape of a thin disc and
a large fraction of their mass is in gas and relatively young
stars. Could they, like the classical bulges, be mistaken for a
barlens? We think this is unlikely, for many reasons, of which
the most important is that
their sizes are much smaller than that of the barlenses,
only of the order of 1 kpc or even smaller
\citep[e.g.][]{Kormendy.Kennicutt.04, Athanassoula.05}. Furthermore, their
populations are on average younger than that of barlenses.
Given their possible formation scenarios, it is expected that the
various types of bulges will very often co-exist
\citep{Athanassoula.05}
and this was indeed shown to be true by observations
\citep{Kormendy.Barentine.10, Nowak.TESBD.10, Mendez.ADCA.14,
Erwin.plus.15}. Could
co-existing classical and discy bulges in galaxies with a bar but no
B/P/X bulge give structures having the
properties of barlenses? We have at our disposal no simulations with the adequate
structures -- i.e. no appropriate simulations with both classical and discy bulges --
to examine this question in depth. However, in view of the arguments we
gave above on the inadequacy of discy bulges to provide reasonable building
blocks for barlenses, this does not seem likely.
Of course discy bulges and barlenses can co-exist (see references in the
previous paragraph). In such cases a number of structures of limited
radial extent, such as nuclear spirals, nuclear rings
and nuclear bars, will be seen in the central parts of the barlenses,
but will in fact be part of the discy bulge
(e.g. \citealt{Laurikainen.SABBJ.13}, L+14), not of the
barlens itself.
\section{Summary}
\label{sec:conclusions}
\indent
In this paper we used snapshots of barred disc galaxy simulations to
make images, which we then
analysed using the same procedures and software as for the analysis of
real galaxy images in previous studies. We found that our
simulations can produce components with properties comparable to
those of observed barlenses. By making a number of comparisons
between simulations and observations -- including morphology, radial
projected density profiles, shapes obtained from ellipse fits and
decomposition results -- we find very good agreement and thus reach the
conclusion that our simulations are sufficiently realistic to
describe accurately components such as barlenses.
Viewing our simulations both face-on and edge-on we were able to explore the nature of
the barlens component and to find that the {\it barlens and the B/P/X
bulge are one and the same component, but viewed from a different angle}.
We found this to be true not only for
elongated barlenses, but also for the case of near-circular ones.
This result concerning the nature of the barlens component implies
that the distribution of the $z$-component of the
velocity of stars in the barlens should correspond to that of a vertically
thick object, while
that of the stars in the thin component should be
that of a vertically thin one. It should be possible to
test this prediction by measuring the vertical velocity component
along the bar major axis of appropriately chosen face-on barred
galaxies. One should then find a much higher
velocity dispersion $\sigma_z$ and a different structure of the higher
velocity moments in the thick barlens component compared to the
thin part of the bar \citep[][]{Iannuzzi.Athanassoula.15}. It is
not, however, necessary to expect that
there should be a sharp transition between the two
regions. Indeed, in Sect.~\ref{sec:global} we found that there is no
such sharp transition in the radial luminosity profile along the bar
major axis, and we attributed
this to the fact that the thin bar component continues inwards into
the barlens region. Thus, in the region surrounding the bar major
axis and within the barlens component there will be contributions
from both components, leading to a smooth transition.
Our result has a further implication, namely that it can set a
rough lower limit of the bar age and a very clear one on the phase of
evolution the bar is in. Indeed, the fact that the barlens and the
boxy/peanut bulge are one and the same component implies that for the
barlens to exist, the B/P/X must
have already formed. Therefore, the bar must be in the secular evolution phase,
i.e. between one and a few Gyr must have elapsed from the moment it
started forming, as was discussed in Sect.~\ref{formation}.
For all the simulations discussed here, the most realistic barlenses
were found when there is between 20 and 80 per cent gas in the initial
conditions. Collisionless simulations, i.e. simulations whose initial
conditions contain no gas, have barlenses which are too extended
compared to observations and
it is not even clear whether using a second bar component in the
decomposition improves the fit. This could be expected because
real galaxies will normally contain some gas when the bar grows,
except for the rather unlikely case when all the gas is consumed
before the bar starts growing and there is no accretion to add more
(AMR13, \citealt{Athanassoula.14}).
At the other extreme, simulations with
initially 100\% gas have very short thin bar components, so that they
are more reminiscent of barlenses in non-barred galaxies. Note also
that, for such high initial gas fractions, the trend between the
fraction of the total flux which is in the
barlens component and the bar strength has a smaller slope than the
observations and is considerably offset towards larger barlens fluxes.
The morphology of the barlens component is such
that in some cases it can be mistaken for a classical
bulge, unless high resolution and high quality photometry and/or
kinematics are available. Furthermore, not including a
barlens in decompositions can artificially increase the
bulge-to-total ratio by, on average, a factor of 3.5 (L+14). This is
due to the classical bulge compensating for the lack of the barlens
component.
Thus the
number of galaxies with no classical bulge is higher than
what has been so far assumed and also in many galaxies the
contribution of the classical bulge to the total mass budget is
substantially lower than what has been so far estimated. This can
introduce errors in dynamical
studies of some individual galaxies and a bias in
a number of statistical studies. We propose that photometry and
particularly kinematics can be used to distinguish
between classical bulges and barlenses and thus avoid misclassifications.
We also give a rule of thumb to obtain the extent of the barlens
component in the direction of the bar major axis, for relatively low
inclination galaxies. This, however, will
not work for all possible morphologies, as for example cases where
the isodensities of the bar are concentric thick ellipses. We
showed that in most of the simulations considered in this paper,
the B/P/X/bl component is compatible with a $x_1v_1$ backbone,
provided the Ferrers models can be considered sufficiently
realistic. On the other hand, the fraction of real
galaxies compatible with an $x_1v_1$ barlens backbone could be
considerably smaller, of the order of
50--60\%.
We also found a trend between the fraction of the total flux that is in
the barlens component and the strength of the
bar, which argues that
during the secular evolution phase, as the bar grows stronger the
barlens component also becomes more important, so that it represents
an increasing fraction of the baryonic mass. This trend is
confirmed by observations. The quantitative comparison is best for a
model with 50\%, rather than 100\% initial gas fraction, which is
indeed in better agreement with observations
\citep[e.g.][and references therein]{Genzel.p.14}.
All our tests confirm that barlenses can be considered as face-on
B/P/X bulges. We do not, however, claim that this is the only possible
alternative, i.e. that there is no other way to explain barlenses.
Indeed, proving uniqueness is very difficult, if not impossible for
the formation of galaxies, or of their components and we can not
exclude
that another alternative will be brought up in the future. We did,
nevertheless, outline some of the serious problems that alternatives
based on a discy bulge component would face.
Our work also underlines the necessity of a further improvement.
Namely, a considerable part of orbital structure
studies and of gas flow calculations should be revisited using yet
more realistic
potentials, which take into account the complex 3D structure of bars
and include the vertical structure of the B/P/X/bl component.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
We thank the referee for his/her comments, Volker Springel for
making available to us
the version of \textsc{gadget} used here and Jean-Charles Lambert for
the \textsc{GLNEMO} software (http://projets.oamp.fr/projects/glnemo2).
All authors acknowledge financial support to the DAGAL network from the People
Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh
Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement number
PITN-GA-2011-289313. EA and AB also acknowledge financial support from the
CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales - France) and from the
`Programme National de Cosmologie and Galaxies' (PNCG) of CNRS/INSU,
France. EA acknowledges the use of HPC resources from GENCI-
TGCC/CINES (Grants 2013 - x2013047098 and 2014 - x2014047098). EL and
HS acknowledge support from the Academy of Finland. This
research is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space
Telescope,
which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
Technology under a contract with NASA.
Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/.
The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, University of Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
\bibliographystyle{mn2e.bst}
|
\section{INTRODUCTION}
\label{sec:intro}
Active noise control (ANC) is a popular technique for removing noise
from a system by using a variant of the system identification
scenario to subtract the effect of a noise-generating plant from a
signal \cite{ancPrinc}. ANC algorithms are based on classical
adaptive algorithms, with provision made for the additional
electroacoustic path between the filter output and measured error signal,
known as the secondary path \cite{ancTutRev}. A common technique to
account for this path is known as the filtered-x (FX) scheme,
originally developed for least-mean square (LMS) algorithms in the
context of adaptive control \cite{adInvCont} and since developed for
other classical algorithms \cite{adSigProc,fapAnc,ancSystems}.
The FX scheme eliminates potential algorithm instability caused by
the additional delay in the secondary path \cite{analysisFxLMS}, but
is marred by slow convergence \cite{improvedMFxLMS}. The modified
filtered-x (MFX) scheme was introduced in \cite{modFxLMS}, and
improves upon the convergence of the FX algorithms by introducing
additional steps to approximate the error signal. MFX schemes have
since become a popular choice for ANC architectures. However, there
is still room to improve the convergence speed.
Recent developments in the field of compressive sensing have led to
the introduction of sparsity-promoting penalties in adaptive
filtering algorithms
\cite{sparseLMS,sparseL0lms,sparseAP,delamaresp,jio,jidf,jio_stcdma,sa_stap},
producing zero-attracting (ZA) and reweighted zero-attracting (RZA)
algorithms. These have been shown to provide faster convergence when
the system in question has a degree of sparsity. This is often the
case in the real systems encountered in ANC applications. To the
knowledge of the authors, however, this powerful sparsity-inducing
technique has not been considered with the modified filtered-x
architecture used in ANC.
In this paper, sparsity-inducing techniques are incorporated
into the filtered-x affine projection (FxAP) algorithm. The FxAP
algorithm is selected since it is a popular algorithm for ANC
applications, performing well in the presence of correlated signals,
and allowing a trade-off between convergence speed and complexity to
be easily controlled by varying the projection order \(K\). A
number of techniques have been introduced to improve the FxAP
algorithm, including the introduction of the modified form, MFxAP
\cite{fapAnc}, and adapting the system parameters over time
(see \cite{evolvingFxAP} and references therein). This paper proposes
zero-attracting and reweighted zero-attracting MFxAP algorithms.
Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the
proposed algorithms for systems with a moderate degree of sparsity.
The rest of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, the
active noise control problem is stated and the MFxAP algorithm is
briefly reviewed. In Section 3 the proposed algorithms are developed
with reference to the MFxAP algorithm from which they derive. In
Section 4, the results of simulation trials performed on these
algorithms are presented and discussed. Section 5 presents
conclusions and describes avenues of further research.
\textit{Notation}: Throughout this paper, uppercase boldface letters
will be used to denote matrices, and lowercase boldface letters to
denote vectors. \(E\lbrace\cdot\rbrace\) denotes statistical
expectation, \(\text{sgn}\lbrace\cdot\rbrace\) is the signum
function, \(\mathbf{I}\) is an identity matrix of appropriate
dimensions, and \(\lVert\cdot\rVert_p\) denotes the \(p\text{th}\)
norm of a vector. All vectors are column vectors. Following
convention, the term \(\ell_0\)-norm and notation
\(\lVert\cdot\rVert_0\) denotes the number of non-zero elements in a
vector.
\section{Problem Statement and Review of the MFxAP Algorithm}
\label{sec:algs}
In this section, the problem of active noise control is explained
and the MFxAP algorithm is reviewed.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\def\epsfsize#1#2{1\columnwidth}
\epsfbox{fig1.eps} \caption{Modified filtered-x AP structure.}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In the common case of feedforward ANC, an error signal is used to adjust an adaptive filter such that its output can be `subtracted' from a signal using the principle of destructive interference, and hence eliminate or significantly reduce disturbing noise. However, the electroacoustic nature of ANC systems introduces a combined \textit{secondary path}, since each component has an associated transfer function. It was shown in \cite{analysisFxLMS} that this can be split into two parts, one estimated as part of the plant, and one occuring after the summing junction and affecting the error signal, here denoted \(\mathbf{s}(n)\). The result is a delay in the system that may cause conventional adaptive algorithms to become unstable. The FX algorithms account for this by using an estimate of the secondary path, \(\mathbf{\hat{s}}(n)\), to filter the input signal \(x(n)\), so that the algorithm input is the filtered signal \(x_f(n)\). However, FX algorithms have strict limits on step size that negatively impact upon convergence speed \cite{improvedMFxLMS}. The MFX algorithms improve upon this convergence speed by estimating the actual error signal, but can be improved further by introducing variable parameter or sparsity-inducing techniques such as those proposed here. The derivation of the MFxAP algorithm is reviewed below.
When deriving the conventional AP algorithm, the following
expression is minimised:
\[\lVert\mathbf{w}(n+1)-\mathbf{w}(n)\rVert^2\quad\text{s.t.}\quad\mathbf{d}(n)=\mathbf{U}(n)\mathbf{w}(n+1)\]where
\(\mathbf{U}(n)\) is a regressor matrix containing past values of
\(x(n)\) as follows:
\[\setlength{\arraycolsep}{2pt}\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\mathbf{U}(n)=\begin{bmatrix}x(n)& x(n-1)& \cdots& x(n-L+1)\{\mathbf x}(n-1)&
x(n-2)& \cdots& x(n-L)\\\vdots& \vdots& \ddots& \vdots\{\mathbf x}(n-K+1)&
x(n-K)& \cdots& x(n-L-K+2)\end{bmatrix}\]
The MFxAP algorithm is
well suited to ANC as it does not require that \(\mathbf{d}(n)\) be
available for its derivation. Instead, we set the condition to be
\begin{equation}\label{condition1}
\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)=\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{w}(n+1)
\end{equation}
where, as seen in Fig. 1,
\(\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)=\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)-\mathbf{\hat{y}}(n)\).
This uses a \textit{filtered} regressor matrix, \(\mathbf{U}_f(n)\),
containing past values of \(x_f(n)\). Therefore, the condition
states that the \textit{estimated} output for the next iteration
should equal the \textit{estimated} desired signal for the current
iteration. Then, using a vector of Lagrange multipliers,
\(\underline{\lambda}\), the cost function becomes:
\begin{equation}\label{jmfxap}
\begin{split}
J_{1}(n)=&\lVert\mathbf{w}(n+1)-\mathbf{w}(n)\rVert^2\\&+\text{Re}\lbrace[\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)-\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{w}(n+1)]^H\underline{\lambda}\rbrace
\end{split}
\end{equation}
In order to minimise the above cost function, we equate the gradient of \(J_{1}(n)\)
with respect to \(\mathbf{w}^*(n+1)\) to zero:
\[\frac{\partial J_{1}(n)}{\partial\mathbf{w}^*(n+1)}=\mathbf{w}(n+1)-\mathbf{w}(n)-\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}=0\]
\begin{equation}\label{mfxapw}
\mathbf{w}(n+1)=\mathbf{w}(n)+\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}
\end{equation}
Substituting the above expression into \eqref{condition1}, gives:
\[\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)=\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{w}(n)+\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}\]
\[\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)=\mathbf{\hat{y}}(n)+\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}\]
\[\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)=\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}\]
\begin{equation}\label{mfxaplam}
\underline{\lambda}=[\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)]^{-1}\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)
\end{equation}
Inserting \eqref{mfxaplam} back into \eqref{mfxapw}, and incorporating a step-size parameter, \(\mu\), and a small positive constant, \(\delta\), to avoid inverting a singular matrix, the MFxAP recursion is obtained:
\begin{equation}\label{mfxap}
\mathbf{w}(n+1)=\mathbf{w}(n)+\mu\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)[\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)+\delta\mathbf{I}]^{-1}\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)
\end{equation}
\section{Proposed Sparsity-Inducing Filtered-X Affine Projection
Algorithms}
In this section, the proposed sparsity-inducing filtered-x affine
projection algorithms are derived. In particular, the
zero-attracting and reweighted zero-attracting strategies
considered in \cite{sparseLMS,sparseAP} are incorporated into a
filtered-x structure, resulting in new algorithms for active noise
control.
\subsection{Zero-attracting MFxAP (ZA-MFxAP) algorithm}
\label{ssec:zafxap}
The ZA-MFxAP incorporates a sparsity-inducing penalty to attract coefficients towards zero. The obvious choice for such a penalty would be the \(\ell_0\)-norm. However, this is a discontinuous and non-convex function, making it costly and difficult to optimise mathematically. Zero-attracting algorithms use an \(\ell_1\)-norm penalty as an approximation, and the penalty is added to the cost function in \eqref{jmfxap} as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{jzamfxap}
\begin{split}
J_{2}(n)=&\lVert\mathbf{w}(n+1)-\mathbf{w}(n)\rVert^2\\
&+\text{Re}\lbrace[\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)-\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{w}(n+1)]^H\underline{\lambda}\rbrace\\
&+\alpha\lVert\mathbf{w}(n+1)\rVert_1
\end{split}
\end{equation}
As before, this cost function is minimised with respect to \(\mathbf{w}^*(n+1)\) and equated to zero, giving:
\[\mathbf{w}(n+1)=\mathbf{w}(n)+\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)\underline{\lambda}-\alpha\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n+1)\rbrace\]
Solving for \(\underline{\lambda}\) and incorporating \(\mu\) and \(\delta\) as before, and making the assumption that \(\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n+1)\rbrace\approx\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n)\rbrace\), we obtain the ZA-MFxAP recursion:
\begin{equation}\label{zamfxap}
\begin{split}
\mathbf{w}(n+1)=&\mathbf{w}(n)+\mu\mathbf{U}_f^+(n)\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)\\&+\rho\mathbf{U}_f^+(n)\mathbf{U}_f(n)\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n)\rbrace\\&-\alpha\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n)\rbrace
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where \(\rho=\mu\alpha\) is known as the zero-attraction strength,
and
\(\mathbf{U}_f^+(n)=\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)[\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{U}_f^H(n)+\delta\mathbf{I}]^{-1}\).
This is identical to \eqref{mfxap} with the addition of two terms,
controlled by \(\rho\), which attract the coefficients towards zero.
\subsection{Reweighted zero-attracting MFxAP (RZA-MFxAP) algorithm}
\label{ssec:rzafxap}
The RZA-MFxAP algorithm uses a log-sum penalty in place of the \(\ell_1\)-norm, as this provides a closer approximation to the behaviour of the \(\ell_0\)-norm. Thus, the cost function becomes:
\begin{equation}\label{jrzamfxap}
\begin{split}
J_{3}(n)=&\lVert\mathbf{w}(n+1)-\mathbf{w}(n)\rVert^2\\
&+\text{Re}\lbrace[\mathbf{\hat{d}}(n)-\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{w}(n+1)]^H\underline{\lambda}\rbrace\\
&+\gamma\sum_{i=1}^L \log(1+\epsilon\lvert w_i(n) \rvert)
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Following a similar derivation procedureto ZA-MFxAP, the RZA-MFxAP recursion is given by:
\begin{equation}\label{rzamfxap}
\begin{split}
\mathbf{w}(n+1)=&\mathbf{w}(n)+\mu\mathbf{U}_f^+(n)\mathbf{\hat{e}}(n)\\&+\rho'\mathbf{U}_f^+(n)\mathbf{U}_f(n)\mathbf{\Psi}(n)-\gamma\epsilon\mathbf{\Psi}(n)
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where \(\mathbf{\Psi}(n) =
\frac{\text{sgn}\lbrace\mathbf{w}(n)\rbrace}{1+\epsilon\lvert\mathbf{w}(n)\rvert}\).
In this case the strength of the zero-attraction is controlled by
\(\rho'=\mu\gamma\epsilon\) where \(\epsilon\) is known as the
shrinkage magnitude. The RZA-MFxAP is more selective than the
ZA-MFxAP, and attracts coefficients proportional to
\(^1/_\epsilon\) toward zero most strongly.
Therefore careful tuning of \(\epsilon\) can reduce the bias of the
estimation procedure.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\def\epsfsize#1#2{1\columnwidth}
\epsfbox{fig2.eps} \caption{Non-sparse plant and secondary paths.}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\section{RESULTS}
\label{sec:results}
This section compares the results of simulation trials for the
proposed algorithms outlined in \eqref{zamfxap} and \eqref{rzamfxap} with those
of the conventional FxAP and MFxAP algorithms. The results are
averaged over 50 simulation trials.
Three types of primary path were used: a non-sparse path (density 785/800), illustrated in Fig. 2, a partially-sparse path formed by arbitrarily setting the majority of the coefficients in the non-sparse path to zero (density 73/800) and a sparse path in which the fourth coefficient is set to one and all remaining coefficients to zero (density 1/800). Three types of secondary path with similar densities were generated in the same way from the non-sparse secondary path in Fig. 2, with \(\mathbf{\hat{s}}(n)=\mathbf{s}(n)\). A poorer estimate of \(\mathbf{s}(n)\) is known to degrade convergence speed, although it has been shown in \cite{imperfectSecPath} that in rare cases \(\mathbf{\hat{s}}(n)\neq\mathbf{s}(n)\) may improve algorithm performance.
For each primary path formulation, the algorithms were run for 220,000 iterations with the secondary path set as sparse at the start of the experiment, changed to partially-sparse at iteration 10,000 and to non-sparse at iteration 70,000. These values were found to provide sufficient time for the proposed algorithms to converge. Figures 3-5 show mean-square deviation (MSD) convergence curves for each of these experiments. Each secondary path change requires that \(\mu\) and the parameter \(\epsilon\) in the RZA-MFxAP algorithm be retuned, with
the requisite values given in the figures. The values \(\delta =
0.002\) and \(\rho = 0.0000001\) were found to be suitable for almost all applications, with \(\rho\) requiring retuning only for the ZAMFxAP algorithm in Fig. 5.
The first 10,000 iterations in each figure illustrate algorithm performance
when the secondary path is sparse. In all cases, the convergence
speeds of conventional and proposed algorithms are similar, with the
higher-order RZA-MFxAP algorithms showing a slight improvement upon
FxAP and MFxAP when the plant is partially sparse as in Fig. 4.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\def\epsfsize#1#2{1\columnwidth}
\epsfbox{fig3.eps} \caption{MSD results for sparse plant
(\(\rho=0.0000001\) and \(\epsilon=10\) unless stated otherwise).}
\label{fig:SINR_RO_nom}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\def\epsfsize#1#2{1\columnwidth}
\epsfbox{fig4.eps}
\caption{MSD results for partially-sparse plant (\(\rho=0.0000001\)
and \(\epsilon=10\) unless stated otherwise).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
It is seen in Fig. 3 that as the secondary path density increases, the convergence speed of the FxAP and MFxAP decreases significantly. The ZA-MFxAP and RZA-MFxAP with projection order 4 improve upon these algorithms by converging within far fewer iterations, but the higher-order RZA-MFxAP algorithm reduces convergence time to a very low number of iterations and also attains lower steady-state MSD than the other algorithms, indicating that the comparative density of the secondary path has a less significant effect on this algorithm than conventional ANC algorithms.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\def\epsfsize#1#2{0.95\columnwidth}
\epsfbox{fig5.eps}
\caption{MSD results for non-sparse plant
(\(\rho=0.0000001\) and \(\epsilon=10\) unless stated otherwise).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The performance of the algorithms when the plant is partially sparse
can be seen in Fig. 4. When the secondary path is semi-sparse, the proposed
algorithms show clear improvement - in terms of both MSD convergence
speed and steady-state performance - over the traditional MFxAP, and
vastly outperform the FxAP algorithm. As the secondary path density
increases further in the third section of Fig. 4, the performance of
the MFxAP is significantly degraded, whereas the proposed algorithms
continue to perform far better, with the RZA-MFxAP - particularly at
higher order - showing the fastest convergence. It should be noted that every algorithm
initially converges at the same rate, but the RZA-MFxAP algorithms
increase in convergence speed as the selective aspect begins work on
coefficients proportional to \(1\textfractionsolidus\epsilon\)
\cite{sparseLMS}. Steady-state differences are clearly visible between RZA-MFxAP orders in this section of Fig. 4. This is primarily due to the tuning of \(\epsilon\), which has a significant impact upon convergence speed if reduced from the selected value. It would therefore be worthwhile to consider algorithms incorporating a variable shrinkage magnitude parameter as an improvement to the algorithms proposed here, allowing steady-state performance to be improved without negatively affecting convergence rate.
The results of running the algorithms for a non-sparse plant can be
seen in Fig. 5. In this case, while the proposed algorithms continue
to significantly outperform the FxAP, the performance gain over the
MFxAP algorithm is less pronounced. This is because the plant is non-sparse, and therefore
the sparsity-inducing technique does not give the proposed
algorithms an advantage when finding an estimate. Although the
difference is less notable than in previous cases, the proposed
algorithms do outperform the MFxAP somewhat - particularly the
RZA-MFxAP with a projection order of 16 - due to the presence of close-to-zero coefficients in the
plant impulse response.
These results demonstrate that in any case where a degree of
sparsity is to be expected in the primary or secondary path, the
best convergence speed and steady-state error can be obtained by
using the proposed RZA-MFxAP algorithm, particularly at a relatively
high projection order such as 16. A higher order may be undesirable
from a complexity point of view, but since the algorithms have a
complexity on the order of \(L^2\) and \(K \ll L\), the increase in
complexity will be small in proportion to the performance gain.
Further work might incorporate recent improvements to sparse
techniques \cite{sa-alt}.
\section{CONCLUSION}
\label{sec:conc}
This paper has proposed adaptive algorithms for exploiting sparsity
in modified filtered-x algorithms required in active noise control
problems. The proposed algorithms have incorporated zero-attracting
and reweighted zero-attracting strategies into filtered-x adaptive
algorithms. The results of simulations have shown that the proposed
techniques improve the convergence of the existing modified
algorithm in the case where the primary and secondary paths exhibit
a degree of sparsity.
\vfill\pagebreak
\bibliographystyle{IEEEbib}
|
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
Outflows/jets are commonly observed from black hole systems. They seem to
originate from the accreting matter as black hole does not have any
intrinsic atmosphere. In rotating accreting matter, centrifugal
force at the vicinity of the black hole acts as a barrier to the
faster supersonic matter following it and eventually
slows it down. If the barrier is strong enough
then it triggers the formation of
shock waves \citep{c96,dcnc01,cd04,d07,c08,cc11}.
This centrifugally supported post-shock matter is hot and
piles up in the form of a torus around the black hole
called CENtrifugal pressure supported BOundary Layer (CENBOL)
{\citep{c99}}.
In the post-shock region, accreting matter is compressed and becomes
hot. Consequently, excess thermal gradient force develops in the
post-shock disc, which ultimately deflects a part of the accreting
matter to form bidirectional outflows/jets.
This was shown via Lagrangian, as well as, Eulerian numerical simulation codes
\citep{mlc94,mrc96,lrc11}. Theoretically, \citet{c99} computed the mass outflow rate for
very simplistic flow configurations, in terms of inflow parameters. In the same spirit, but
considering rotating accretion flow,
\citet{dcnc01} computed the mass outflow rates from input parameters
of inviscid flow where the accretion is rotating but jet was assumed to be radial.
Later, \citet{cd07,dc08} calculated mass loss from
dissipative accretion disc considering rotating outflow. Subsequently,
mass outflows have been computed for variety of shocks \citep{bdl08,dbl09},
various types of acceleration mechanisms \citep{kc13,kcm14}, and even for variable
adiabatic index \citep{kscc13}, using an equation of state of the flow designed to handle
multi-species fluid \citep{cr09}.
Recently, \citet{dcnm14} showed that a part of the inflowing matter is
periodically ejected from the disc when the viscosity parameter is chosen beyond its
critical values.
Already, \citet{cd07} and \citet{dc08} studied the outflow properties in
terms of the disc viscosity and cooling processes. The outflow rate
computed from the appropriate
choice of the inflow parameters is consistent with the jet kinematic
luminosity estimated from the radio luminosity of the jets \citep{hs03}.
Here, we mean outflows as jets and not winds.
Jets differ from winds as they are usually fast, supersonic and collimated
outflows. It is well known that the increase of accretion rate demonstrates
the transition of the black hole sources from hard to softer spectral states
\citep{ct95,c97} which suggests an
underlying connection between outflow properties and the spectral states.
The outflow rate also depends on viscosity, which indicates that there
exists a range of viscosity that allows mass loss from the disc for a
given accretion rate. Such critical limits of the viscosity is not
studied so far and for the first time, we identify the range of viscosity
for the formation of mass outflow from the accretion disc .
In the next Section, we present the basic assumptions and governing
equations. In Section 3, we discuss the results and finally present
the conclusions.
\section{Assumptions and model equations}
We consider a steady, viscous, axisymmetric accretion
flow on to a Schwarzschild black hole. We adopt
\citet{pw80} potential to describe space-time geometry around the
black hole. Also, the flow is assumed to be in hydrostatic equilibrium in the
vertical direction \citep{matetal84}. In our model,
jets are tenuous, and have negligible shear and therefore can be assumed to be
inviscid \citep{cd07} and
have low angular momentum compared to the outer edge of the disc.
In this work, we use $2G=M_{\rm BH}=c=1$ unit system, where
$G$, $M_{\rm BH}$, and $c$ are the gravitational constant, the
mass of the black hole, and the velocity of light, respectively.
\subsection{Equations for accretion}
The dimensionless governing equations for accretion are \citep{c96},
\noindent (a) the radial momentum equation:
$$
u \frac {du}{dx}+\frac {1}{\rho}\frac {dP}{dx}
-\frac {\lambda^2(x)}{x^3}+\frac {1}{2(x-1)^2}=0,
\eqno(1a)
$$
\noindent (b) the mass conservation equation:
$$
\dot M = 2 \pi \Sigma u x,
\eqno(1b)
$$
\noindent (c) the angular momentum conservation equation:
$$
u \frac {d\lambda(x)}{dx}+\frac{1}{\Sigma x}
\frac {d}{dx}\left( x^2 W_{x\phi}\right)=0,
\eqno(1c)
$$
and (d) the entropy equation:
$$
u T \frac {ds}{dx}= Q^{+} - Q^{-}
\eqno(1d)
$$
where, $x$, $u$, $\rho$, $P$ and $\lambda(x)$ are the radial distance,
radial velocity, density, isotropic pressure and specific angular
momentum of the flow, respectively. Here, $\Sigma$ is vertically
integrated density,
$s$ is the specific entropy of the flow, and $T$ is the
local temperature. The viscous stress is represented by $W_{x\phi}$
($=- \alpha \Pi$, $\Pi = [W+\Sigma u^2] $ is the vertically integrated
total pressure, $\alpha$ is the viscosity parameter, $W$ is vertically
integrated thermal pressure).
The gain of heat by the flow are given by \citep{c96,dc08},
$$
Q^{+} = -\frac{{\alpha}}{\gamma} x(ga^2+\gamma u^2)\frac{d\Omega}{dx},
\eqno(2a)
$$
where, $\gamma$ is the adiabatic index, $g = I_{n+1}/I_n$, $n=1/(\gamma -1)$,
$I_n=(2^n n!)^2/(2n+1)!$ \citep{matetal84}. In this work, Bremsstrahlung
cooling process is ignored as it is inefficient and only synchrotron cooling
is considered which is given by \citep{dc08},
$$
Q^{-} = \frac{Sa^5}{ux^{3/2}(x-1)},
\eqno(2b)
$$
where,
$$
S = \frac{32\eta\mu^2 e^4 \times 1.44\times10^{17}}{3\sqrt{2}m^3_e\gamma^{5/2}}
\frac{{\dot m}_i}{2GM_{\odot}c^3}.
\eqno(2c)
$$
Here, $e$ is the electron charge, $m_e$ is electron mass, $M_{\odot}$ is
solar mass, and $\mu = 0.5$ for fully ionized plasma. The accretion rate
${\dot m}_i$ is measured in units of Eddington accretion rate adopting
$10 M_{\odot}$ black hole. We use $\eta~(\le 1)$ which is
the ratio between the magnetic pressure to the gas pressure to estimate
the magnetic field for synchrotron cooling.
In this work,
$\gamma=4/3$ and $\eta = 0.1$ are used throughout the paper.
\subsection{Equations of motion for outflows}
The conserved energy equation for jet is given by \citep{cd07},
$$
{\mathcal E}_j= \frac{1}{2}v^2_j+na^2_j +\frac {\lambda^2_j}{2x^2_j}
-\frac{1}{2(r_j-1)},
\eqno{(3a)}
$$
where, ${\mathcal E}_j$ and $\lambda_j$
are the specific energy and the angular momentum of the jet, respectively.
The integrated continuity equation for jet is,
$$
{\dot M}_{\rm out}=\rho_j v_j {\mathcal A},
\eqno{(3b)}
$$
where, ${\dot M}_{\rm out}$ is the outflow rate, $\rho_j$ is the jet density,
$v_j$ is the jet velocity and ${\mathcal A}$ denote the area function of the
jet \citep{cd07}.
\section{Method}
Since a part of the accreting matter is deflected at the CENBOL
surface to form bidirectional outflows \citep{dcn13,dcnm14},
therefore, our focus would be on such
accretion solutions that contain stationary shocks. For shock, accreting
flow must possess two saddle type sonic points, namely inner sonic point
($x_{ci}$) and outer sonic point ($x_{co}$). Interestingly, the range of
$x_{ci}$ is usually restricted within $2-4~r_g$ ($r_g \equiv$ Schwarzschild
radius) \citep{cd04,d07} and we choose $x_{ci}$ as one of the input
parameters to obtain
the accretion solution that includes shock wave. Other input parameters
are angular momentum $\lambda_i$ at $x_{ci}$, viscosity $(\alpha)$ and
accretion rate ${\dot m}_i$, respectively. We calculate the
accretion solution by integrating the governing equations (Eqs. 1a-d)
once from $x_{ci}$ inwards and then outwards \citep{cd04}. The condition
for steady shock requires conservation of energy flux, mass flux,
and momentum flux across the shock front \citep{ll59} and in
presence of mass loss, conservation of mass flux is taken care
considering mass outflow rate $R_{\dot m}$ defined as the ratio
between the mass flux of the outflow (${\dot {M}}_{\rm out}$)
and the pre-shock accretion rate (${\dot {M}}_{-}$) \citep{cd07} which
are given by,
$$
{\mathcal E}_{+} = {\mathcal E}_{-};~
{\dot{M}}_{+} ={\dot {M}}_{-}-{\dot {M}}_{\rm out}
={\dot {M}}_{-}(1-R_{\dot m}); ~
{\Pi}_{+} = {\Pi}_{-},
\eqno{(4)}
$$
where, subscripts ``$-$'' and ``$+$'' refer
to the quantities before and after the shock, respectively.
We consider that jet is launched with the same energy, angular
momentum and density of the post-shock flow and the corresponding
mass outflow rate is given by \citep{cd07,dc08},
$$
R_{\dot m} =\frac{{\dot M}_{\rm out}}{{\dot M}_-}
=\frac{Rv_{j}(x_s) {\mathcal A}(x_s)}
{4 \pi \sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma}}x^{3/2}_s (x_s-1)a_+u_{-}},
\eqno{(5)}
$$
where, $x_s$ is the shock location, $R~(={\Sigma_+}/{\Sigma_-})$
is the compression ratio and $a_{+}$ is the post-shock sound
speed. We simultaneously solve the accretion-ejection equations
to obtain shocks in presence of mass loss in the following way.
We first find the virtual shock location $x^{\prime}_{s}$ without
considering mass loss. We assign shock energy ${\mathcal E}(x^{\prime}_{s})$
and angular momentum $\lambda(x_{s}^{\prime})$ as the jet energy ${\mathcal E}_j$
and $\lambda_j$ and solve the jet equations to obtain corresponding
$R_{\dot m}$. Now we use $R_{\dot m}$ in shock condition to find
the new shock location. We continue the iteration to converge for
actual shock location and the corresponding $R_{\dot m}$ is the
relative mass outflow rate. Here, the jet is assumed to have the same
energy as the post shock disc. Since these bidirectional outflows are
launched from the post-shock disc, therefore, the flow parameters at the
jet base should be same as that of the disc from where it is being launched.
For simplicity, we consider the immediate post-shock Bernoulli parameter
to be that of the jet.
\section{Results and discussion}
\begin{figure}
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig1.eps}}
\caption{Parameter space spanned by the angular momentum
$(\lambda_{i})$ at the inner sonic point and the viscosity. Different
boundaries separate the parameter space for mass loss from the disc.
Solid boundary is for solutions having no cooling and the boundaries drawn
with dotted and dot-dashed curves are for various accretion rates marked in
the panel. See text for details.}
\label{f:one}
\end{figure}
In this work, we intend to find the range of viscosity that admits mass
loss from an advective accretion disc around the black holes. To achieve
our goal, we supply the inflow parameters, namely, inner sonic points
($x_{ci}$), angular momentum $(\lambda_{i})$ and viscosity ($\alpha$),
respectively and look for global inflow-outflow solutions. Of the three
parameters, we fixed angular momentum $(\lambda_{i})$ and vary
inner sonic points ($x_{ci}$) and viscosity ($\alpha$) for all possible
range. Essentially, we identify the region of the parameter space
spanned by the angular momentum $(\lambda_{i})$ and viscosity ($\alpha$)
for mass loss which is shown in Fig. 1. It is indeed fascinating to
see that mass loss is possible for a wide range of viscosity
which again strongly depends on the angular momentum of the accreting
matter at the inner part of the disc. We classify the parameter space
as function of accretion rate ${\dot m}_i$
and separate it with the solid, dotted and dot-dashed
boundaries. Solid boundary represents the cooling free solutions that
are independent of ${\dot m}_i$.
The dotted and dot-dashed boundaries denote the solutions that correspond to
$ {\dot m}_i= 0.005$ and ${\dot m}_i = 0.01$, respectively.
As the cooling is increased, the size of the post-shock region shrinks
\citep{d07} and the possibility of mass loss is reduced
\citep{c99,dcnc01} which is consistent with the conclusions of
\citet{dc08} and \citet{ggc12}.
This result has a profound implication as
\citet{dc08} pointed out that with the appropriate choice of the
inflow parameters, the present disc-jet model successfully explains the
jet luminosity at least for two objects, namely, M87 and
Sgr~${\rm A}^{*}$. \citet{dc08} estimated the mass outflow rate of M87 jets as
$0.009 M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ which gives a kinematic luminosity of
$\sim 10^{43}$ergs s$^{-1}$ \citep{rmfhc96} considering few percent efficiency, while
for Sgr~${\rm A}^{*}$ the estimated mass loss was $9\times 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
that also satisfies the kinematic luminosity of $\sim 10^{38}$ergs s$^{-1}$
accepted in the literature \citep{y00,ymf02}.
In the similar way, with this methodology one can estimate the jet power in hard states
for the galactic stellar mass black hole sources as well.
In this work, we choose a set of $\gamma$ and $\eta$ values to
represent our results. We examined the dependency of mass loss
parameter space on $\gamma$ and observed only quantitative variation
in a way that the parameter space is shifted towards the lower
viscosity and angular momentum side for $\gamma > 4/3$.
As discussed in Section 2.1, the limit is $\eta \le 1$ and we use
$\eta = 0.1$. For higher $\eta$, the effect of radiative loss would be
more for the same accretion rate (Eq. 2c) and thereby reduce the thermal
driving of the jets.
Eventually, the parameter space for mass loss would further be
reduced with the increase of $\eta$ values.
Recently \citet{nrs13} reported that several GBH sources
exhibit hard to hard-intermediate spectral state transition
along with the increase of QPO frequency and radio
and X-ray fluxes.
However, during the transition from hard-intermediate
to soft-intermediate state, the QPO disappears
followed by the transient radio flare. This perhaps indicates
that the presence of weaker/mildly relativistic, continuous jet
is related to a component of the disc which is responsible for
QPO. And the disappearance of QPO followed by strong radio flare
shows that it is the same component of the disc which gets disrupted and
expelled as strong, relativistic ejections during the
hard-intermediate
to soft-intermediate state transition.
This observation confirms the presence of shock in accretion disc
and also identifies the post-shock disc (CENBOL) as the seat of
hot electrons/Comptonizing cloud whose dynamics is responsible
for jet generation and QPOs.
With these insights, it would be intriguing to interpret the relations
among the jet evolution, spectral states and QPOs in greater details.
Indeed, some of the seminal works has already been
initiated \citep{cm00,gc13}.
Our present effort which is the
identification of ranges
of viscosity parameter and accretion rate
resulting steady jets, would be an insight
for impending numerical simulations to study variabilities
of black hole accretion-ejection system.
Overall, one can
limit the value of viscosity parameter while explaining
the jet power for numerous objects which we intend to explore elsewhere.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
AN acknowledges Dr. Anil Agarwal, GD, SAG, Mr. Vasantha E. DD, CDA and Dr.
S. K. Shivakumar, Director, ISAC for continuous support to carry out this
research. The authors also acknowledge the anonymous referee for
fruitful suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
|
\section{Introduction \label{sec:intro}}
Variational principles and symmetries are fundamental tools for the construction of interactions and the study of possible extensions of well-known classical field theories like gravity. Imposing global and local symmetries, together with unitarity and locality, provides us with a guide to explore extensions (or modifications) of the action of a given consistent theory.
What about duality symmetries? Particularly, what about the electric-magnetic duality invariance? This symmetry shows up in diverse physical systems, from zero to higher spin theories, and carries many interesting features that make it depart somehow from the general character of global and local symmetries. In the case of linearized gravity and free higher spin gauge fields in four dimensions, for example, duality invariance can be manifestly implemented at the level of the action and not just in the equations of motion. Such implementation breaks, however, manifest spacetime covariance \cite{DeTe,HeTe2,DeSe2}. This feature bookmarks an interesting link between duality and spacetime symmetries, something that acquires a concrete form in the case of an Abelian gauge field for which it can be shown that duality invariance implies Poincaré invariance \cite{BuHe4}. Moreover, evidence on the relation between duality and supersymmetry has been provided recently, showing that self-duality may arise in some models with $N=2$ supersymmetry plus a particular hidden $N=2$ supersymmetry (see \cite{CaKal}). On the other hand, an actual breaking of gauge invariance in Maxwell theory results if one tries to make duality invariance a local symmetry \cite{MaPr,Saa,BuHe3}.
Another interesting feature of duality invariant models is that making it manifest at the level of the action requires new variables, ``electric'' and ``magnetic'' potentials, and doubling the number of gauge symmetries (see \cite{BaGo,BaTr2} for the case of electromagnetism and gravity with electric and magnetic sources). Despite these sorts of frictions between duality invariance and other symmetries in field theory, the interest in it comes from the belief that understanding an eventual relation between the two of them might enrich our view of hidden symmetries in supergravity and M theory \cite{West}.
In $d$ dimensions, one has for gravity that the electric-magnetic duality relates the graviton, a rank-2 symmetric tensor, with fields of higher rank. If we account for duality, then there are two equivalent descriptions of linearized Einstein theory: One based on the metric $h_{\mu\nu}$ and the other in terms of its dual field $T_{\mu_1\ldots\mu_{d-3}|\nu}$, a mixed Young tableaux of $(d-3,1)$ symmetry type whose covariant action was given by Curtright \cite{Cu}. In four dimensions the dual graviton is a rank-2 symmetric tensor, as is the graviton itself. At nonlinear level, however, there are obstructions for the implementation of duality in the Einstein-Hilbert action. This is because the Curtright action does not admit any non-Abelian deformation under the assumptions of spacetime covariance and locality \cite{BeBoHe,BeBoCn}.
The search for modifications and/or deformations of general relativity (GR) is actually a very active trend of current research. The aim there is to find a gravity theory that bypasses the basic problems associated with the quantization of the classical formulation of gravity as a standard field theory. Among the many directions in this trend one can find noncommutative gravity, stringy corrections to the GR action, new massive gravity, double field theory and, recently, Ho\v{r}ava-Lifshitz gravity \cite{Hor4,HoMe-Th,Hor3,Hor2,Hor1}. The latter is proposed as a UV completion of GR using a ``heretic'' proposal \cite{KeSf}: breaking diffeomorphism invariance to a subgroup that is still manifest in ADM formalism. As a consequence of this breaking, different treatments for the kinetic and potential terms are necessary. The kinetic term is still quadratic in time derivatives (but deformed by introducing a new parameter $\lambda$), and the potential has terms that can be higher order in space derivatives of the metric.
The Ho\v{r}ava-Lifshitz (HL) action
\begin{multline*}
S_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}=\int \mathrm{d}t\mathrm{d}^3x\sqrt{g}N\Bigl( \frac{2}{\kappa^2}( K_{ij}K^{ij}-\lambda K^2 ) +\mu^4 \stackrel{(3)}{R} \\+\zeta \stackrel{(3)}{R^2} +\chi \stackrel{(3)}{R^{ij}} \stackrel{(3)}{R}_{ij}+\gamma \stackrel{(3)}{R}\Delta \stackrel{(3)}{R}+\dots \Bigr),
\end{multline*}
where $K_{ij}$ and $\stackrel{(3)}{R}_{ij}$ denote, respectively, the components of the extrinsic curvature and the Ricci tensor of the spatial manifold, is built to be power counting renormalizable. At large distances, higher derivative terms do not contribute and the theory is supposed to run to GR. The parameter $\lambda$ is the parameter which controls the contribution of the trace of the extrinsic curvature and of some of the higher derivative terms.\footnote{Like the term proportional to $\stackrel{(3)}{R^2}$; for example, see \cite{Hor2}.} For $\lambda=1$ the theory has a fixed point in the IR, recovering GR.
The aim of the present note is to implement the electric-magnetic duality in the linearized part of the HL action. The interesting point is that the breaking of full diffeomorphism invariance for generic values of $\lambda$ is not an obstacle for the implementation of duality. Then, this can be viewed as an exercise to test how duality is affected when we put spacetime covariance under stress.
The implementation of duality as a symmetry of the action of linearized gravity was done in \cite{HeTe2}. The approach of the authors in that work is to solve the Hamiltonian and momentum constraints to obtain the prepotentials (analogous to the magnetic and the electric vector potentials in electromagnetism ---the latter arising from solving the Gauss constraint), and then to show the manifest invariance of the action under $SO(2)$ rotations of those variables. Here we do not follow this method but instead we parallel the work of \cite{BoCnHe} where the authors connect Fierz-Pauli (FP) theory with its dual through a parental action; still, we do make some comments on the former approach in Sec. \ref{sec:diracanalisis}, where we fix some ideas related to the model at hand.
The parent action approach is defined with a first order Lagrangian from which both FP theory for the graviton in the framelike formulation and the corresponding theory for the dual graviton can be extracted (see Fig. \ref{fig:parentalscheme}). Duality in the framelike formulation has been worked out also in \cite{AjHaSi}. Having this scheme in mind, we proceed in Sec. \ref{sec:dualHL} in two steps: First we look for an action in the \textit{vielbein} basis for the linearized part of the HL gravity in Sec. \ref{sec:linHLvierbein}. This action is enhanced with respect to the latter in the sense that it enjoys diffeomorphism invariance, but still is not local Lorentz invariant; linearized HL gravity arises from it by imposing a gauge fixing condition. Then we find a parent action in Sec. \ref{sec:HLparental} that delivers this theory and its dual by the same mechanism used in \cite{BoCnHe}.
\renewcommand{\dgeverylabel}{\displaystyle}
\begin{figure}[ht!]
$$
\begin{diagram}
\node{}\node{\mbox{\small{Parental}}~\cal{L}[e,Y]}\arrow{se,t}{e_{ab}~\mbox{\small{multiplier}}}\arrow{sw,t}{Y^{ab\mid}_{}{c}~\mbox{\small{auxiliary}}}\node{} \\
\node{\boxed{\cal{L}[e_{ab}]}}\arrow{s,l}{\mbox{\small{gf}}~e_{[ab]}
\node{}\node{\boxed{\cal{L}[W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}]}}\arrow{s,l}{\mbox{\small{gf}}~W^{abc\mid}{}_{c}}\\
\node{\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize FP}}}[h_{ab}]
\node{}\node{\mbox{\small{dual of FP:}}~\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}[T_{a_1\dots a_{d-3}\mid b}]}
\end{diagram}
$$
\caption{\textsf{\small{Role of the parent Lagrangian in $d$ dimensions for FP theory. $h_{ab}$ are the first order perturbations of the metric and $T_{a_1\dots a_{d-3}\mid b}$ are the components of the dual graviton. The child theories $\cal{L}[e_{ab}]$ and $\cal{L}[W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}]$ depend on the \textit{vielbein} and some potentials $W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}$, respectively (such that $Y^{ab\mid}{}_c=\partial_d W^{abd\mid}{}_c$, $Y^{ab\mid}{}_c$ being a redefinition of the spin connection). They enjoy arbitrary shifts of $e_{[ab]}$ and of the trace $W^{abc\mid}{}_{c}$ as gauge symmetries, respectively. Those variables can be marginalized with gauge fixing (gf) conditions recovering the FP Lagrangian on the left branch and the Curtright theory on the right one. In $d=4$ the dual graviton is a rank-2 symmetric tensor and $\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}$ has the same functional form as $\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize FP}}}$, showing that FP theory is self-dual.}}}\label{fig:parentalscheme}
\end{figure}
The output of the procedure described above in the case of $d=4$ is that the dual of linearized HL gravity is the same functional deviation of the FP Lagrangian for the dual graviton, but controlled by a different parameter $\gamma=\gamma(\lambda)$. In Sec. \ref{sec:Curtright}, and before some concluding remarks, we speculate in a sort of Ho\v{r}ava-like deviation of the Curtright action, the dual of FP theory in $d=5$.
\section{Linearized minimal deviation\label{sec:diracanalisis}}
In this section we review some properties of the model under consideration, its gauge symmetries and degrees of freedom (d.o.f.). Particularly we want to comment on the constraint structure of linearized HL gravity, and in its regards to the electric-magnetic duality under the light of the analysis performed in \cite{HeTe2}.
HL gravity comes with a preferred foliation of spacetime arising from an assumed inherent anisotropy scaling between space and time. In contrast to GR, the gauge symmetries of this theory are given by the \textit{foliation preserving diffeomorphisms}, generated by $\delta x^i=\xi^i(x,t)$ and $\delta t=\xi^{0}(t)$. Time reparametrizations $\delta t=\xi^{0}(t)$ are time dependent only and it has been shown that they are trivial gauge symmetries \cite{HeKlLu,HeKlLu2}. We will come back to this feature in the next section.
As a consequence of the diffeomorphism invariance breaking, HL gravity contains a problematic extra mode \cite{ChNiPaSa}, which in the linear approximation is manifest only for perturbations around spatially inhomogeneous and time-dependent backgrounds \cite{BlPuSi2}. The theory generically exhibits also a dynamical inconsistency: In asymptotically flat spacetimes, the lapse function $N$ is generically constrained to vanish, preventing any interesting dynamics except for some particular cases (like spacetimes with vanishing extrinsic curvature) \cite{HeKlLu}. Despite these unappealing features, HL theory provides us with a concrete model for gravity that departs from the relativistic paradigm and is tractable for testing the electric-magnetic duality in it.
For the present analysis we assume the theory is describing some solutions that are blind to the above mentioned problems, and we take the linearized part of the minimal deviation from GR\footnote{The minimal deviation has two parameters besides the coupling $\kappa$ of GR. These are the dimensionless $\lambda$ in the kinetic term and $\mu$ with mass dimensions $[\mu]=1$ for the potential energy. We choose here $\frac{\mu^4}{2}=\frac{1}{\kappa^2}$ just to deal with the deviation due to $\lambda$. This action reproduces the EH action of GR in the $\lambda\rightarrow 1$ limit (see \cite{KeSf}).} represented by the action
\begin{equation*}
S_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}=\frac{2}{\kappa^{2}}\int \mathrm{d}t\mathrm{d}^3x\sqrt{g}N\Bigl( K_{ij}K^{ij}-\lambda K^2 +\stackrel{(3)}{R} \Bigr)
\end{equation*}
in $d=4$ dimensions and ADM separation. The perturbation around flat spacetime $g_{ij}=\eta_{ij}+\varepsilon h_{ij}$, $N=1+\varepsilon n$, and $N_i=\varepsilon n_i$, to quadratic order gives the Lagrangian
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:lagADMlin}
L^{(2)}_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}=\varepsilon^{2}\int \mathrm{d}^3x \Bigl[\frac12 \dot{h}_{ij}\dot{h}^{ij}-\frac{{\textcolor{Red}{\lambda}}}{2}\dot{h}^2-2\partial_i n_j(\dot{h}^{ij}-{\textcolor{Red}{\lambda}}\eta^{ij}\dot{h}) \\ +\partial_i n_j\partial^i n^j +(1-2\textcolor{Red}{\lambda})(\partial_i n^i)^2 +R ~\Bigr]
\end{multline}
($h\equiv \eta^{ij}h_{ij}$ and $\dot{}\equiv\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$), with
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:grpot}
R \equiv -\frac12 \partial_k h_{ij} \partial^k h^{ij} + \frac12 \partial_i h \partial^i h
+\partial_i h^{ij} \partial^k h_{kj}\\
- \partial_i h^{ij} \partial_j h +2n(\partial_i\partial_j h^{ij}-\Delta h).
\end{multline}
From now on we will focus our attention on the structural properties of Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}). This Lagrangian deviates from FP theory in those terms proportional to $\lambda$, to which this theory goes in the $\lambda\to 1$ limit. Despite that such modifications due to a value of $\lambda\neq 1$ are subtle, the structural consequences are big.
Foliation preserving diffeomorphisms act on the field variables as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:folpresdiff}
\delta h_{ij}=\partial_{i}\xi_{j}+\partial_{j}\xi_{i}, \quad\delta n_i= \dot{\xi}_i,\quad\delta n=-\dot{\xi}_{0},
\end{equation}
and they are a subset of the full group of diffeomorphisms: $\delta_{\xi}h_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}\xi_{\nu}+\partial_{\nu}\xi_{\mu}$. Having less gauge symmetry than the FP Lagrangian, we would expect linearized HL gravity to have more than 2 d.o.f.. However, this is not seen by the constraint structure of the model. We briefly summarize its analysis here because
it shows a detail that we use in the argument of the next section.
The highlights of the constraint analysis go as follows: We get from the start the set of primary constraints $\phi^{0}=p$ and $\phi^{i}=p^{i}$, the variables $p,~p^{i}$ being the conjugate momenta of $n,~n_{i}$, respectively. The canonical Hamiltonian is given by
\begin{equation*}
H=\int \mathrm{d}^3x \Bigl( \frac12\pi^{ij}\pi_{ij}-\frac{\theta}{4}\pi^2+2\partial_i n_j\pi^{ij}-R\Bigr),
\end{equation*}
with
\begin{equation*}
\theta\equiv\frac{2\lambda}{3\lambda-1},
\end{equation*}
the variables $\pi^{ij}$ being the conjugate momenta of $h_{ij}$. The trace $\pi\equiv\eta_{ij}\pi^{ij}$ is proportional to the linearized trace of the extrinsic curvature:
\begin{equation*}
\pi=(1-3\lambda)(\dot{h}-2\partial^in_i)=2(1-3\lambda)K.
\end{equation*}
For $\lambda=\frac13$ there is one more primary constraint: $\pi=0$. This case has been analyzed by the authors of \cite{BeReSo}, where they show that the same is equivalent to FP theory (and manifestly in the transverse-traceless gauge). In the following we exclude from our analysis this particular value of $\lambda$.
Stabilization of the primary constraints results in the set of secondary constraints,
\begin{equation*}
\psi^0=2(\partial_i\partial_j h^{ij}-\Delta h)\quad\text{and}\quad \psi^i=2\partial_j \pi^{ji}
\end{equation*}
(the same Hamiltonian and momentum constraints as in FP theory), and there are more secondary constraints:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:K}
\chi=(\theta-1)\Delta\pi \quad \text{and} \quad \chi'=-4(\theta-1)\Delta^{2} n.
\end{equation}
$\chi=0$ results from stabilization of $\psi^{0}$, placing a constraint on the trace of the extrinsic curvature, and $\chi'=0$ from stabilization of $\chi$. At the end, stabilization of $\chi'$ results in conditions for a Lagrange multiplier ($\psi^{i}$ gives no further constraints nor conditions on Lagrange multipliers). Following the authors of \cite{HeKlLu}, the constraint equation $\Delta^{2}n=0$ in asymptotically flat spacetime determines the lapse function and in fact forces it to vanish, freezing in this way the evolution in time of the theory. The authors also showed (see \cite{HeKlLu2}) that time reparametrizations are trivial gauge transformations and so there is no first class constraint associated to it. Indeed, by inspection of the Poisson brackets between the constraints we see that they vanish except for
\begin{align*}
\{\chi(x),\psi^0(y)\}& = 2(\theta-1)\Delta^{2}\delta(x-y), \\
\{\chi'(x),\phi^0 (y)\}& = -4(\theta-1)\Delta^{2}\delta(x-y),
\end{align*}
and as a consequence the Hamiltonian constraint, the one we would have expected to generate the evolution in $t$, is second class. Thus we have a set of four second class ($\phi^{0},~\psi^{0},~\chi,~\chi'$) and a set of six first class ($\phi^{i},~\psi^{i}$) constraints, and thereby we might conclude that there are 2 d.o.f.. The fact that the extra mode is not manifest here is because we are taking the linearized theory around flat spacetime \cite{BlPuSi2}. Given that $\psi^{i}$ are first class, the only\footnote{Gauge transformations generated by constraints $\phi^i$ are just arbitrary shifts of $n_i$.} nontrivial gauge transformations of the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}) are those associated to $\delta x^{i}=\xi^{i}(x,t)$.
Now, there is one detail of the constraint structure that is relevant for the electric-magnetic duality on Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}). Following the approach of \cite{HeTe2} for the case of FP, we can try to analyze duality rotations in terms of the prepotentials $\Phi_{ij}$ and $P_{ij}$ defined by solving the constraints $\psi^{0}=0$ and $\psi^{i}=0$ [see Eqs. (2.7) and (2.11) of \cite{HeTe2}]. However, in the present case we face an extra constraint placing a condition on $P_{ij}$, namely,
\begin{equation*}
\chi=(\theta-1)\Delta \pi=(\theta-1)\Delta (\eta^{ij}\Delta -\partial^{i}\partial^{j})P_{ij}=0,
\end{equation*}
with no counterpart for the $\Phi_{ij}$ variables. Besides, there is no exchange between the kinetic and potential energies after these rotations as it happens in FP theory, and the condition above does not help to make the match. This leaves us with the idea that linearized HL gravity is not self-dual.
Nevertheless, we can analyze duality from another point of view that allows us to draw a map to the magnetic dual of linearized HL gravity ---we call the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}) the electric one. The path goes through a parent action, analogous to the one constructed in \cite{CaMoUr3} for FP theory. This procedure is reformulated in \cite{BoCnHe} in a way that suits the purpose of the present study. In the following section, we use this approach to find the magnetic dual of linearized HL gravity.
\section{Parental action and dual theory\label{sec:dualHL}}
Schematically, the road map presented in \cite{BoCnHe} starts from the second order action in \textit{vielbein} formalism for FP, taking it up to a first order parent action and then down from it to the second order dual theory given by the Curtright Lagrangian (see Fig. \ref{fig:parentalscheme}). In the present case, and to keep parallelism with FP theory, we need an action in the \textit{vielbein} basis as a starting point, the same that should be obtained by a parental one (see left branch of Fig. \ref{fig:approach}).
We proceed then in two steps. First we look for an action corresponding to the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}) in the \textit{vielbein} basis in Sec. \ref{sec:linHLvierbein} and next we construct a parent action from which we can obtain the latter and its dual in Sec. \ref{sec:HLparental}. The Lagrangian in the \textit{vielbein} basis we write is in fact invariant under full diffeomorphisms, but not local Lorentz invariant though. It has more fields and symmetries than linearized HL gravity and delivers this theory through gauge fixing conditions. Finally, on the dual side, we define the theory, also imposing analogous gauge fixing conditions (see the right branch of Fig. \ref{fig:approach}).
\renewcommand{\dgeverylabel}{\displaystyle}
\begin{figure}[ht!]
$$
\begin{diagram}
\node{}\node{\mbox{\small{Parental}}~\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e,Y]}\arrow{se,t}{e_{ab}~\mbox{\small{multiplier}}}\arrow{sw,t}{Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}~\mbox{\small{auxiliary}}}\node{} \\
\node{\boxed{\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]}}\arrow{s,l}{\mbox{\small{gf}}
\node{}\node{\boxed{\cal{L}_{\lambda}[W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}]}}\arrow{s,r}{\mbox{\small{gf}}}\\%~\rho*} \\
\node{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{\underbrace{\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}[h_{ab}]}}{{\mbox{linear HL gravity}}}
\node{}\node{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{\underbrace{\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}[T_{a_1\dots a_{d-3}\mid b}]}}{{\mbox{dual of lin. HL gravity}}}
}
\end{diagram}
$$
\caption{\textsf{\small{The Lagrangian density $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$ depends on the \textit{vielbein}s and it is parametrized by $\lambda$, the same parameter appearing in linearized HL gravity defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}). This theory is diffeomorphism invariant, so it is not linearized HL gravity; the latter is obtained from $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$ by gauge fixing (gf) conditions that in fact eliminate all antisymmetric components of $e_{ab}$. Analogously on the dual side $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}]$ has some variables that can be eliminated through gauge fixing conditions to get a Lagrangian depending only on the dual graviton components.}}}\label{fig:approach}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Linearized HL gravity in \textit{vielbein} language}
\label{sec:linHLvierbein}
The Lagrangian density
\begin{equation*}
\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize EH}}}[e_{ab}]=-\frac{e}{2}\Bigl( \Omega^{abc}\Omega_{abc}+2\Omega^{abc}\Omega_{acb}-4\Omega^{a}\Omega_{a} \Bigr)
\end{equation*}
represents Einstein-Hilbert (EH) theory in the \textit{vielbein} $e_{a}{}^{\mu}$ basis. The inverses of these fields are written\footnote{Latin letters from the beginning of the alphabet refer to indices in tangent space (contracted with the flat metric $\eta_{ab}$) whereas greek letters refer to indices in spacetime. Symmetrization and antisymmetrization, denoted by brackets $(\dots)$ and $[\dots]$, respectively, of any set of indices are defined with strength 1.} $e_{\mu}{}^{a}$, the functions $\Omega_{ab}{}^{c}\equiv 2 e_{a}{}^{\mu}e_{b}{}^{\nu}\partial_{[\mu}e_{\nu]}{}^{c}$ are the anholonomy coefficients, $\Omega_{a}\equiv\Omega_{ab}{}^{b}$ and $e\equiv \det{(e_{a}{}^{\mu})}$. This Lagrangian depends on $d^{2}$ fields in $d$ dimensions, certainly more variables than the independent components of the metric. However, local Lorentz invariance takes care of the excess.
Linearization of the above Lagrangian corresponds to FP theory, written as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:FPlag}
\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]=-\frac{1}{2}\Bigl( \Omega^{abc}\Omega_{abc}+2\Omega^{abc}\Omega_{acb}-4\Omega^{a}\Omega_{a} \Bigr),
\end{equation}
where $\Omega_{abc}=2\partial_{[a}e_{b]c}$. (We apologize for the abuse of notation when using the same for the \textit{vielbein} and its perturbation to linear order.) Two things are important to notice here: tangent and world space indices are identified, and the fields $e_{ab}$ do not have definite symmetry. Nevertheless, $\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]$ depends on the symmetric part $h_{ab}\equiv 2e_{(ab)}$ and on the antisymmetric part $f_{ab}\equiv 2e_{[ab]}$ in very different ways.
The above Lagrangian splits as
\begin{equation*}
\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]=\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize FP}}}[h_{ab}] + \cal{M}[h,f],
\end{equation*}
where
\begin{multline*}
\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize FP}}}[h_{ab}]=-\frac12\partial^ah^{bc}\partial_ah_{bc}+\partial_ah^{ac}\partial^bh_{bc}\\
-\partial^bh^{a}{}_{a}\partial^c h_{bc}+\frac12\partial_ah^{b}{}_{b}\partial^a h^{c}{}_{c}
\end{multline*}
is the FP Lagrangian for $h_{ab}$, and $\cal{M}$ is a total derivative, namely,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:M}
\cal{M}\equiv \partial_{a}\Bigl(-\frac12 h^{c}{}_{c}\partial_{b}f^{ab}\Bigr).
\end{equation}
So, while $h_{ab}$ is a dynamical field,\footnote{In fact, $h_{ab}$ are the components in tangent space of the perturbation to the metric around flat spacetime: $h_{\mu\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}-\eta_{\mu\nu}$.} $f_{ab}$ enters the action only through a total derivative term, having relevance, if any, only for boundary conditions.
Because of that, the Lagrangian density (\ref{eq:FPlag}) is invariant under the transformations $\delta e_{ab}=\partial_{(a}\xi_{b)}+\frac12\omega_{ab}$ given by general coordinate transformations $\delta x^{\mu}=\xi^{\mu}(x)$ and arbitrary shifts of the components $f_{ab}$ in terms of parameters $\omega_{ab}(x)=-\omega_{ba}(x)$. In other words, the Lagrangian for FP theory in this language is invariant under the field variations
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:FPgaugesymm}
\delta_\xi h_{ab}=2\partial_{(a}\xi_{b)}\quad\text{and}\quad\delta_\omega f_{ab}=\omega_{ab}.
\end{equation}
Using the gauge transformations for the components $f_{ab}$ we can fix them on the boundary to be zero, eliminating them from the theory (both from the action and boundary data). The Lagrangian (\ref{eq:FPlag}) is then a theory only for the symmetric components $h_{ab}$. We are looking for a Lagrangian density for linearized HL gravity just as a deviation from it.
Let us think for the moment in $d=4$ and take the following prescription:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:lagrhorlin}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]=\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]+2(1-\lambda)(\Omega_0)^2,
\end{equation}
where the parameter $\lambda$ is meant to be the same appearing in the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}). Again, the above Lagrangian density depends on both the symmetric $h_{ab}$ and antisymmetric $f_{ab}$ parts of the \textit{vierbein}. One can anticipate that the presence of the last term for $\lambda\neq 1$ will break Lorentz invariance somehow and thus prevent allocating $f_{ab}$ inside a total derivative. These variables will be eliminated by slightly different means to get a theory just for the symmetric components $h_{ab}$, the variables which linearized HL gravity depends on.
To see that, let us inspect the symmetries of the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}), where
\begin{equation*}
\Omega_0 = \frac12 [\dot{h} -\partial^i(h_{0i}+f_{0i})],\quad h\equiv\eta^{ij}h_{ij},
\end{equation*}
and which we do not expect to be more than those of Eq. (\ref{eq:FPgaugesymm}). Here we assumed some choice of reference frame where $x^{0}\equiv t$ is the time coordinate. Both $\Omega_{0}$ and $\cal{L}_{1}$ depend on $h_{ab}$ and $f_{ab}$, but in the latter $f_{ab}$ enters only the total derivative $\cal{M}$ given in (\ref{eq:M}). For the following, it is convenient to make use of the ADM separation of variables, for which $n_i= h_{0i}$, and we define the notation $e_i\equiv f_{0i}$.
The way in which the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) is written reflects that it does not share all the symmetries of $\cal{L}_{1}$ given in (\ref{eq:FPgaugesymm}). Let us concentrate on how the $(\Omega_0)^2$ term changes under those transformations. Despite the manifest fact that it is not a Lorentz covariant quantity, it is invariant under the global variations $\delta_{\omega}f_{ab}$ with parameters $\omega_{ab}$ being constant.\footnote{In general $\delta\Omega_{abc}=\partial_{c}\partial_{[a}\xi_{b]}+\partial_{[a}\omega_{b]c}$, so for $\xi_a$ linear in $x^\mu$ and $\omega_{ab}$ a constant, we have $\delta\Omega_{abc}=0$.} The same can be cast as invariant under general coordinate transformations by breaking local Lorentz invariance. To see how, let us apply the transformations (\ref{eq:FPgaugesymm}) on it. That is,
\begin{multline*}
\delta (\Omega_0)^2=2\Omega_0\delta \Omega_0=\Omega_0\bigl(\delta_\xi\dot{h}-\partial^i(\delta_\xi n_i)-\partial^i(\delta_\omega e_i)\bigr) \\
=\Omega_0\bigl( 2\partial^i\dot{\xi}_i-\partial^i(\dot{\xi}_i+\partial_i\xi_0)-\partial^i\omega_{0i}\bigr) \\
=\Omega_0\bigl( \partial^i\dot{\xi}_i-\Delta\xi_0-\partial^i\omega_{0i}\bigr).
\end{multline*}
In order to have a symmetry, we have to require $\partial^i(\dot{\xi}_i-\partial_{i}\xi_0-\omega_{0i})=0$. We can take this as an equation for $\omega_{0i}$ restricting the arbitrariness of this parameter. The general solution for it is the sum of the solution to the homogeneous equation (any transverse $\zeta^{i}$) and a particular solution to the inhomogeneous equation:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:omegarestr}
\omega_{0i}=\zeta_{i}+\dot{\xi}_{i}-\partial_{i}\xi_{0},\quad \text{such that} \quad\partial^{i}\zeta_{i}(x,t)=0.
\end{equation}
We observe that shifts of $f_{ij}$ with parameters $\omega_{ij}$ survive the deviation due to $\lambda\neq 1$ as gauge symmetries, and also the gauge transformations of the transverse part of $e_{i}$ with parameters $\zeta_{i}$. The transformation of the longitudinal part of $e_{i}$ on the other hand gets linked to the transformation of the longitudinal part of $n_{i}$, and hence their shifts are not arbitrary anymore. To sum up, the gauge symmetries of Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) are given by
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:gaugsymm}
\begin{align}
\delta_\xi h_{ij}=2\partial_{(i}\xi_{j)},\quad &\delta_\xi n_i=\dot{\xi}_i+\partial_i\xi_0,\quad \delta_\xi n= -\dot{\xi}_0, \label{eq:gaugsymmh} \\
\delta_{\omega} f_{ij}=\omega_{ij}, \quad &\delta_\omega e_i=\zeta_{i}+\dot{\xi}_i-\partial_i\xi_0. \label{eq:gaugsymmf}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
The transformations (\ref{eq:gaugsymmh}), which are just $\delta_{\xi}h_{ab}=2\partial_{(a}\xi_{b)}$ projected on ADM variables, show that $\cal{L}_{\lambda}$ enjoys full diffeomorphism invariance, and the (\ref{eq:gaugsymmf}) part that the variables $f_{ij}$ and the transverse part of $e_{i}$ are pure gauge (but not the longitudinal part of $e_{i}$, which is the one appearing in $\Omega_{0}$).
Let us now take a closer look into $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e]$. By direct inspection we see that the set of equations of motion (EoM) of this Lagrangian for $h_{ij}, n_i, n, e_i$ is not equivalent to the one arising from linearized HL gravity. For instance, the EoM for $e_i$,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eome}
-(1-\lambda)\partial_i(\dot{h}-\partial^jn_j-\partial^je_j)=0
\end{equation}
has no parallel in the set of EoM coming from Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagADMlin}). Nevertheless, it is not difficult to see that if we enforce that $\partial^i n_i=\partial^i e_i$ in the first set, the two systems are equivalent. In the above equation, for example, what happens is that this condition is bringing the constraint on the linearized trace of the extrinsic curvature to a Lagrangian equation [{\em{cf.}} (\ref{eq:eome}] after this projection with constraint $\chi=0$ in (\ref{eq:K})).
The equivalence of these two systems can also be seen directly at the level of the Lagrangians. Using the shorthand $m_i\equiv n_i+e_i$ direct computation gives
\begin{align*}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}&= \cal{L}_{1}+\frac{(1-\lambda)}{2}(\dot{h} -\partial^i m_{i})^2 \\
&=\frac{1}{2}\Bigl(\dot{h}_{ij}\dot{h}^{ij}-\lambda \dot{h}^2 -4\partial_jn_i\dot{h}^{ij}\\
&\hskip0.3in+(4\partial^in_i -2\partial^im_i +2\lambda\partial^im_i)\dot{h}\\
&\hskip0.3in-2\partial^in_i\partial^jn_j+(1-\lambda)\partial^im_i\partial^jm_j+2\partial_in_j\partial^in^j \\
&\hskip0.3in-\partial_k h_{ij}\partial^k h^{ij} +\partial_i h \partial^i h +2\partial^ih_{ij}\partial_k h^{kj}\\
&\hskip0.3in- 2\partial_i h^{ij} \partial_j h +4n(\partial_i\partial_j h^{ij}-\Delta h)\Bigr) \\
&\hskip0.3in +\cal{M}[h_{ij},n_{i},n;f_{ij},e_{i}].
\end{align*}
It is straightforward to see that if we impose
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:HLgaugefixcond}
\rho\equiv\partial^i n_{i}-\partial^i e_{i}=0
\end{equation}
in the above expression, we have $\partial^im_i=2\partial^in_i$, and then
\begin{align*}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}\mid_{\rho=0}&=\frac{1}{2}\Bigl(\dot{h}_{ij}\dot{h}^{ij}-\lambda \dot{h}^2 -4\partial_in_j(\dot{h}^{ij} -\lambda\eta^{ij}\dot{h})\\
&\hskip0.3in+2(1-2\lambda)\partial^in_i\partial^jn_j+2\partial_in_j\partial^in^j \notag\\
&\hskip0.3in-\partial_k h_{ij}\partial^k h^{ij} +\partial_i h \partial^i h +2\partial^ih_{ij}\partial_k h^{kj} \\
&\hskip0.3in- 2\partial_i h^{ij} \partial_j h +4n(\partial_i\partial_j h^{ij}-\Delta h)\Bigr)\notag +\cal{M}\mid_{\rho=0} \notag \\
&=\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}} +\cal{M}\mid_{\rho=0}.
\end{align*}
Hence, by imposing the condition (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}) on $\cal{L}_\lambda[e_{ab}]$, we get the Lagrangian of linearized HL theory modulo the total derivative $\cal{M}\mid_{\rho=0}$, in which the longitudinal part of $e_{i}$ is fixed in terms of $n_{i}$. (That is all we can do using $\rho=0$, since this condition says nothing about the transverse part of this vector.) Now we can go further and get rid of $f_{ij}$ and the transverse part of $e_{i}$ inside $\cal{M}\mid_{\rho=0}$ by setting them to zero using the gauge symmetries given in (\ref{eq:gaugsymmf}).
In conclusion, taking $\cal{L}_{\lambda}$ simultaneously with $\rho=0$ we have a theory for the symmetric components $h_{ab}$ of the \textit{vierbein}s, whose dynamics is given precisely by the EoM of $\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize HL}}}$ and for which we can provide boundary data that confidently allow us to forget all about $\cal{M}$. Moreover, the condition (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}) is preserved by the gauge symmetries of linearized HL gravity. Its variation under transformations (\ref{eq:gaugsymm}) is
\begin{multline*}
\delta \rho=\partial^i(\delta_\xi n_i)-\partial^i(\delta_\omega e_i)\\
=\partial^i(\dot{\xi}_i+\partial_i\xi_0)-\partial^i(\dot{\xi}_i-\partial_i\xi_0)=2\Delta\xi_0.
\end{multline*}
Hence, $\rho=0$ is preserved by transformations with parameters $\xi^i=\xi^i(x,t)$ completely arbitrary and $\xi^{0}$ subject to equation $\Delta \xi_{0}=0$. Arbitrary functions of time $\xi^{0}=\xi^{0}(t)$ are solutions of this equation.
Actually, it is possible to see that $\rho=0$ is a partial gauge fixing condition that eliminates time reparametrizations as nontrivial gauge transformations. In the Appendix, \ref{app:newconstr} we perform the constraint analysis of the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) and see that there are first class constraints generating, in particular, the gauge transformations
\begin{equation*}
\delta_\xi h_{ij}=0,\quad\delta_\xi n_i=\partial_i \xi_{0}=-\delta_\omega e_i,\quad \delta_\xi n= -\dot{\xi_{0}},
\end{equation*}
\textit{i.e.}, Eq. (\ref{eq:gaugsymm}) for $\xi^{\mu}=(\xi^{0},0,0,0)$ with $\xi^{0}=\xi^{0}(x,t)$ arbitrary. The condition (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}) can be taken as a gauge fixing condition of one of those first class constraints.
Now that we have a Lagrangian in the \textit{vierbein}s basis for linearized HL gravity (in the sense explained above and depicted in the left branch of Fig. \ref{fig:approach} we proceed next to find the parent action from which $\cal{L}_\lambda[e_{ab}]$ and its dual theory can be obtained.
\subsection{Parent action for linearized HL gravity and its dual}
\label{sec:HLparental}
We follow here the authors of \cite{BoCnHe}, where they define a parent action for FP theory,\footnote{We also use the notation of this reference.} to find the corresponding parent action for the deviation of this theory defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}). Roughly speaking, we look for a first order theory depending on the \textit{vielbein} and some auxiliary fields from which we extract both the second order electric Lagrangian $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$ and its magnetic dual. The former arises from solving the auxiliary fields into the parent action. The dual theory is obtained by taking $e_{ab}$ in it as Lagrange multipliers.
In addition to the procedure to obtain the dual of $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$, to actually get the dual of linearized HL gravity for the symmetric components of the \textit{vierbein}s in $d=4$, we have to impose a magnetic analogue of the electric condition (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}).
We start by considering the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}),
\begin{equation*}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]=\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]+2(1-\lambda)(\Omega_0)^2 ,
\end{equation*}
in $d$ dimensions. A parent action for it can be defined with the Lagrangian density
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:lagrhorpo}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e,Y]=- 2\Bigl( Y^{ab\mid c}\Omega_{abc}- Y^{ab\mid c}Y_{ac\mid b} +\frac{1}{(d-2)}Y^{a} Y_{a} \Bigr)\\
+2\frac{(\theta -1)}{(d-2)}(Y_{0})^{2},
\end{multline}
with $\Omega_{abc}=2\partial_{[a}e_{b]c}$, and $\theta$ a parameter that we expect to be related with $\lambda$ (see below). Here, besides the \textit{vielbein} we have some tensor variables $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}$ antisymmetric in $ab$, but with no definite symmetry in $c$. As before, the notation $Y^{a}\equiv Y^{ab\mid}{}_{b}$ means the trace $Y^{ab\mid}{}_b=\eta_{bc}Y^{ab\mid c}$.
We see from the EoM of the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}) that $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}$ are auxiliary fields, solved in terms of $e_{ab}$ and their derivatives as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:yvarauxhor}
Y_{ab\mid c}=\frac12\Omega_{abc}-\Omega_{c[ab]}+2\eta_{c[a}\delta_{b]}{}^{d}\Bigl(\Omega_{d}-f(\theta)\eta_{d0}\Omega^{0}\Bigr),
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation*}
f(\theta)=\frac{(d-2)(\theta-1)}{(d-1)(\theta-1)+1}.
\end{equation*}
Plugging Eq. (\ref{eq:yvarauxhor}) into the first order Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}) we get the second order electric $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$ if
\begin{equation*}
\theta=\frac{(d-2)\lambda}{(d-1)\lambda -1}.
\end{equation*}
The parameter $\theta(\lambda)$ plays the role of $\lambda$ in the dual magnetic theory, a coefficient in front of the deviation from the dual of $\cal{L}_{1}[e_{ab}]$. Hence, the electric and magnetic theories are deviations from FP and its dual by terms proportional to parameters belonging to complementary regimes, since when $\lambda < 1 \Rightarrow \theta > 1$ and \textit{vice versa}.
Before going on to the dual theory, let us check the symmetry transformations of the parent Lagrangian. Transformations (\ref{eq:gaugsymm}) of $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e_{ab}]$ can be extended to gauge invariances of $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[e,Y]$ by the corresponding transformations of the auxiliary fields. In fact, the restriction given in Eq. (\ref{eq:omegarestr}) arises here also from general assumptions. Using that $\delta e_{ab}=\partial_{(a}\xi_{b)}+\frac12\omega_{ab}~\Rightarrow~\delta\Omega_{abc}=\partial_{c}\partial_{[a}\xi_{b]}+\partial_{[a}\omega_{b]c}$, we get from Eq. (\ref{eq:yvarauxhor})
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:gaugtrY}
\delta Y_{ab\mid c}=\partial_{c}\partial_{[a}\xi_{b]}-\frac12\partial_{c}\omega_{ab}\\
+\eta_{c[a}\left(\eta_{b]d}-(1-\lambda)\eta_{b]0}\delta^{0}{}_{d}\right)(\partial^{d}\partial^{e}\xi_{e}-\partial^{e}\partial_{e}\xi^{d}+\partial_{e}\omega^{ed}).
\end{multline}
The Lagrangian is invariant,
\begin{multline*}
\delta \cal{L}_{\lambda}=-\Bigl( \delta Y^{ab\mid c}\Omega_{abc}+4\frac{(\theta-1)}{(d-2)}Y_{0}\delta Y_{0}\\
+Y^{ab\mid c}(\delta\Omega_{abc}-2\delta Y_{ac\mid b}+\frac{2}{(d-2)}\eta_{bc}\delta Y_{a})\Bigr) \simeq 0,
\end{multline*}
where $\simeq$ means modulo total derivatives.
The first term in the last expression involves the $e_{ab}$ variables, and it is the only one that does. Requiring its invariance results in the differential equation that is solved with Eq. (\ref{eq:omegarestr}), restriction on the parameters that implies $\delta Y_{0}=0$, making the last term invariant on its own. The rest of the terms cancel out on account of the antisymmetry property of $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}$ in indices $ab$. Hence, the gauge symmetries of Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) are properly captured by symmetries of the parent Lagrangian.
We now compute the dual theory. Taking in the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}) the $e_{ab}$ as Lagrange multipliers, the constraints associated read $\partial_a {Y^{ab\mid}}_c=0$. These are solved by potentials ${W^{abe\mid}}_c$ completely antisymmetric in indices $abe$ such that ${Y^{ab\mid}}_c=\partial_{e}{W^{abe\mid}}_c$. Reduction of Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}) gives the dual theory:
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:hordual1}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[{W^{abe\mid}}_{c}]=2 \Bigl(Y^{ab\mid c}Y_{ac\mid b}-\frac{1}{(d-2)}Y^{a}Y_{a}\Bigr)\\+2\frac{(\theta-1)}{(d-2)}(Y_{0})^{2},
\end{multline}
where $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}$ are functions of the potentials $W^{abe\mid}{}_{c}$. It is not difficult to see that the action defined with this Lagrangian is invariant under transformations (\ref{eq:gaugtrY}) for $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c}$, the restriction (\ref{eq:omegarestr}) coming here from the last term.\footnote{With this restriction, using Eq. (\ref{eq:gaugtrY}) it can be seen that $\delta(\partial_{a}Y^{ab\mid}{}_{c})=0$, meaning that the constraint defining the dual potentials $Y^{abc\mid}{}_{d}$ is invariant for those gauge transformations.} However, these do not exhaust the gauge symmetries of the dual theory. There are more of these coming from an ambiguity in the potentials solving $\partial_a {Y^{ab\mid}}_c=0$. The redundancy is given by the gauge transformations
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:phiymm}
\delta_{\phi}W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}=\partial_{e}\phi^{abce\mid}{}_{d}
\end{equation}
with $\phi^{abce\mid}{}_{d}=\phi^{[abce]\mid}{}_{d}$ arbitrary. These transformations leave the field strengths $Y^{ab\mid}{}_{d}$ invariant and so the Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual1}).
A closer look into the symmetries of the dual magnetic theory and its structure comes from the decomposition
\begin{equation*}
{W^{abc\mid}}_d={X^{abc\mid}}_d+\delta_d^{[a}Z^{bc]},
\end{equation*}
consisting of extracting from ${W^{abc\mid}}_d$ its trace (the fields ${X^{abc\mid}}_d$ are completely antisymmetric in $abc$ indices and traceless). Plugging the above decomposition into Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual1}), we end up with the dual theory written as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:hordual}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[X,Z]=\cal{L}_{1}[X,Z]+\frac{2(d-2)}{9}(\theta -1)(\partial_{i}Z^{i0})^{2}.
\end{equation}
The $\cal{L}_{1}[X,Z]$ part is the dual of the FP theory in $d$ dimensions:
\begin{equation*}
\cal{L}_{1}[X,Z]=2~\partial_{d}X^{abd\mid c}\partial^{e}X_{ace\mid b}+\mathcal{M}[X,Z],
\end{equation*}
the last term being the total derivative
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:totalderdual}
\cal{M}\equiv \frac23\partial_{c}\Bigl(2\partial_{d}X^{cda\mid b}Z_{ab}+ Z_{a}{}^{[b}\partial_{b}Z^{ac]}\Bigr)
\end{equation}
and the only place where $\cal{L}_{1}[X,Z]$ depends on $Z^{ab}$.
We identify Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) as the dual of (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}). It is manifest here that $\cal{L}_{1}$ is invariant under arbitrary shifts of the traces: $\delta_{\tilde{\omega}}Z^{ab}=\tilde{\omega}^{ab}=-\tilde{\omega}^{ba}$. These include the projection of the gauge symmetries given in Eq. (\ref{eq:phiymm}) for those variables, which split as
\begin{multline*}
\delta_{\phi}W^{abc\mid}{}_{d}=\\
\partial_{e}\phi^{abce\mid}{}_{d}\rightarrow \left\{
\begin{aligned}
& \delta_{\phi}Z^{ab}= -\frac{3}{(d-2)}\partial_{c}\phi^{abc},~\phi^{abc}\equiv\phi^{abcd\mid}{}_{d}\\
& \delta_{\phi}X^{abc\mid}{}_{d} = \partial_{e}\phi^{abce\mid}{}_{d}+ \frac{3}{(d-2)}\delta_{d}^{[a}\partial_{e}\phi^{bc]e}
\end{aligned}
\right. .
\end{multline*}
The $\delta_{\phi}X^{abc\mid}{}_{d}$ part leaves $\cal{L}_{1}$ invariant modulo a total derivative. Moreover, it is easy to see that $\delta_{\phi}(\partial_{a}Z^{ab})=0$, and so it is straightforward that these transformations leave also invariant the last term in Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}). The same is not invariant, however, under arbitrary shifts of $Z^{ab}$. Instead, demanding invariance of this term will restrict the arbitrariness of $\tilde{\omega}_{ab}$.
Let us define $Z^{0i}\equiv Z^{i}$ and separate it into transverse and longitudinal parts, $Z^{i}=Z_{\perp}^{i}+Z_{\parallel}^{i}$. We can do the same with the gauge parameters $\tilde{\omega}^{0i}\equiv\tilde{\omega}^{i}=\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\perp+\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\parallel$, the transverse (or divergenceless) $\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\perp$ corresponding to the shift of the component $Z_{\perp}^{i}$. Invariance of the last term in Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) requires
\begin{equation*}
\delta_{\tilde{\omega}}(\partial_{i}Z^{i})=\delta_{\tilde{\omega}}(\partial_{i}Z_{\parallel}^{i})=\partial_{i}\tilde{\omega}^{i}=\partial_{i}\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\parallel=0,
\end{equation*}
an equation that puts no restriction on the gauge transformations of $Z_{\perp}^{i}$, which stand as pure gauge (as well as the components $Z^{ij}$). The parallel components $\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\parallel$ on the other hand are restricted to be constant in the spatial hypersurface, that is, $\delta_{\tilde{\omega}} Z_{\parallel}^{i}=\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\parallel(t)$.
We have here a very similar, if not the same, breaking of local Lorentz invariance as in the electric theory. To sum up, the gauge symmetries for the dual theory are given by
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:dualgaugsymm}
\begin{align}
&\delta_\phi X^{abc\mid}{}_{d}=\partial_{e}\phi^{abce\mid}{}_{d}+ \frac{3}{(d-2)}\delta_{d}^{[a}\partial_{e}\phi^{bc]e}, \label{eq:dgaugsymmh} \\
&\delta_{\tilde{\omega}}Z^{ij}=\tilde{\omega}^{ij}, \quad \delta_{\tilde{\omega}} Z^{i}=\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\perp+\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\parallel(t),~\text{such that}~\partial_{i}\tilde{\omega}^{i}_\perp=0. \label{eq:dgaugsymmf}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
We have constructed then the dual of Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) in $d$ dimensions, and identified the gauge symmetries of the same. We did it by giving a parent action defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}), from which we get both theories. In the case of the electric theory, we obtained linearized HL gravity from Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin}) by imposing the gauge fixing condition (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}). We wonder now if there is an analogous magnetic gauge fixing condition for Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) in $d=4$ dimensions such that the projected dual theory in reduced space is linearized HL gravity.
Let us introduce the field redefinition
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fieldred}
T_{a_1 \dots a_{d-3}\mid c}\equiv \frac{1}{3!}\epsilon_{a_1 \dots a_{d-3} efg}{X^{efg\mid}}_c,
\end{equation}
such that
\begin{equation*}
T_{[a_1 \dots a_{d-3}\mid c]}=0,
\end{equation*}
which makes manifest that the dual $\cal{L}_{1}[T,Z]$ is the FP Lagrangian for the dual graviton, in $d=4$ [see Eq. (2.16) in \cite{BoCnHe}]. In these variables, the action defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) for the dual theory is written as
\begin{multline*}
S_{\lambda}^{*}[T,Z]= \int\mathrm{d}^4x \Bigl( \cal{L}_{1}[T,Z]+\frac{4}{9}(\theta -1)(\partial_{i}Z^{i})^{2} \Bigr)\\
=2 \int\mathrm{d}^4x\Bigl(\partial^aT^{bc}\partial_aT_{bc}-2\partial_aT^{ac}\partial^bT_{bc}+2\partial^bT^{a}{}_{a}\partial^c T_{bc}\\
-\partial_aT^{b}{}_{b}\partial^a T^{c}{}_{c} + \cal{M}[T,Z]
+ \frac{2}{9}(\theta -1)(\partial_{i} Z^{i})^{2}\Bigr).
\end{multline*}
In $d=4$ the symmetries (\ref{eq:dgaugsymmh}) can be written as $\phi^{abcd\mid}{}_{e}= \epsilon^{abcd}\chi_{e}$ with $\chi_{a}$ arbitrary, which implies $\delta_{\phi}T_{ab}=-\partial_{(a}\chi_{b)}$.
At this stage we can get rid of $Z^{ij}$ and $Z_{\perp}^{i}$ by fixing them to zero using the gauge invariance under arbitrary shifts. The $Z_{\parallel}^{i}$ component is, however, still part of the picture. In order to have a theory for $T_{ab}$ only, we need to impose a condition analogue to (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}), with which we could write $Z_{\parallel}^{i}$ (or more precisely, its divergence) in terms of some components of $T_{ab}$.
Let us separate first the Lagrangian defining the action above in space and time components. That is,
\begin{multline*}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[T,Z]=-2\Bigl( \dot{T}_{ij}\dot{T}^{ij}-\dot{T}^{2}-4\partial_{i}T_{0j}(\dot{T}^{ij}-\eta^{ij}\dot{T}) \\-2\partial^{i}T_{0i}\partial^{j}T_{0j}-2\partial_{i}T_{0j}\partial^{i}T^{0j}+2R_{T} \Bigr) \\
+\cal{M}[T,Z]+\frac{4}{9}(\theta -1)(\partial_{i} Z^{i})^{2},
\end{multline*}
where we have defined
\begin{multline*}
R_{T}\equiv -\frac12 \partial_{k}T_{ij}\partial^{k}T^{ij}+\frac12\partial_{i}T\partial^{i}T+\partial_{i}T^{ij}\partial^{k}T_{kj}\\
-\partial_{i}T^{ij}\partial_{j}T-T_{00}(\partial_{i}\partial_{j}T^{ij}-\Delta T)
\end{multline*}
[which is nothing but the potential (\ref{eq:grpot}) as a function of the component $T_{ij}$ of the dual graviton] and $T\equiv\eta^{ij}T_{ij}$.
With the following \textit{ansatz} for the magnetic projection condition,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:magneticcond}
\rho^{*}\equiv \partial_{i}Z^{i}-(\dot{T}-2\partial^{i}T_{0i})=0,
\end{equation}
some arithmetics give
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:magHLd4}
\cal{L}_{\lambda}[T,Z]\mid_{\rho^{*}=0} ~\simeq~ -2\Bigl(\dot{T}_{ij}\dot{T}^{ij}-\textcolor{Blue}{\gamma} \dot{T}^2 -4\partial_iT_{0j}(\dot{T}^{ij} -\textcolor{Blue}{\gamma}\eta^{ij}\dot{T})\\+2(1-2\textcolor{Blue}{\gamma})\partial^iT_{0i}\partial^jT_{0j}-2\partial_iT_{0j}\partial^iT^{0j} +2R_{T}\Bigr),
\end{multline}
with
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:gamma}
\gamma\equiv 1+\frac29\Bigl(\frac{1-\lambda}{3\lambda-1}\Bigr).
\end{equation}
Here we were able to get rid of $\cal{M}$ because now this term is a total derivative that can be eliminated from the picture with boundary conditions on $T_{ab}$ (this is the only field which the above Lagrangian depends on).
So, we see that it is possible to supplement $\cal{L}_\lambda[T,Z]$ with the condition (\ref{eq:magneticcond}) such that the reduced theory has the same structure as linearized HL gravity. The suggested \textit{ansatz} is motivated of course by recovering the linearized HL gravity Lagrangian,\footnote{Starting from a general combination of $\dot{T}$ and $\partial^{i}T_{0i}$ in it, which are the objects involved in the terms proportional to $\lambda$ in the Lagrangian for linearized HL gravity, it can be seen that those terms should be in a ratio of $\frac{\dot{T}}{\partial^{i}T_{0i}}\sim 2$.
} but there is another justification for this particular form of the gauge fixing condition. In the electric theory, we mentioned that the gauge fixing (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}) projects the EoM for $e_i$ onto
\begin{equation*}
\partial_j(\dot{h}-2\partial^i n_i)=\partial_j(2K)=0,
\end{equation*}
with $K(x,t)$ the trace of the linearized extrinsic curvature. So, $\rho=0$ is implementing the constant mean curvature (CMC) gauge, in which $K$ is a function of time only.
In the case of the dual theory, the EoM for $Z^j$ is given by
\begin{equation*}
\frac89 (\theta-1)\partial_j(\partial_i Z^i)=0,
\end{equation*}
from which we conclude that $\partial_i Z^i$ is a function of time only. So, the projection $\rho^*=0$ given by Eq. (\ref{eq:magneticcond}) is fixing this function to be the trace of the extrinsic curvature for the dual graviton,
\begin{equation*}
\partial_i Z^i = 2 K_T(t)=\dot{T}-2\partial^{i}T_{0i},
\end{equation*}
which is the CMC gauge again.
As in the electric theory, we want to take the dual Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) together with condition (\ref{eq:magneticcond}) as the dual theory of linearized HL gravity. Then, we would like to preserve such condition by the gauge symmetries of the theory. Applying transformations (\ref{eq:dualgaugsymm}) to $\rho^*=0$, where $\delta_{\phi}T_{ab}=-\partial_{(a}\chi_{b)}$, we get
\begin{align}
\label{eq:timerep}
0=\delta\rho^{*}&=\cancelto{0}{\delta_{\tilde{\omega}}(\partial_{i}Z^{i})}-\Bigl(\delta_{\phi}(\dot{T})-2\delta_{\phi}(\partial^{i}T_{0i})\Bigr) \notag \\
&=-\Bigl(\eta^{ij}\partial_{0}\delta_{\phi}T_{ij}-2\partial^{i}\delta_{\phi}T_{0i}\Bigr) \notag \\
&=-\Bigl( \eta^{ij}\partial_{0}(-\partial_{(i}\chi_{j)})-2\partial^{i}(-\partial_{(0}\chi_{i)}) \Bigr) \notag \\
\Rightarrow &-\Delta\chi_{0}=0.
\end{align}
This means that gauge symmetries such that $\chi_{0}=\chi_{0}(t)$ preserve the gauge fixing condition, while the same is invariant with $\chi_{i}$ completely arbitrary. These are the gauge symmetries of linearized HL gravity.
In conclusion, in $d=4$ the magnetic dual of linearized HL gravity Eq. (\ref{eq:magHLd4}) has the same structure of the former electric theory, but parametrized with $\gamma(\lambda)$. The electric and magnetic linearized HL deviations come then proportional to parameters with values in `complementary regimes'. For example, we see that $\frac13 <\lambda\leq 1 ~ \Rightarrow ~ \gamma \geq 1$. The case $\lambda=1=\gamma$ corresponds of course to FP theory on both sides of the duality, and the two parameters are equal once again for $\lambda=\frac{7}{27}=\gamma$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:gl}).
\begin{figure}[ht!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.45]{./fig3v4.png}
\end{center}
\caption{\textsf{\small{Plot of $\gamma$ \textit{vs.} $\lambda$.}}}\label{fig:gl}
\end{figure}
For the latter, electric and magnetic linearized HL gravity are given by the same deviation from the FP Lagrangian with the same parameter. The two mentioned values of $\lambda$ belong to two branches in parameter space separated by an asymptote in $\lambda=\frac13$, where duality is not defined.
So far so good for $d=4$. What happens in $d>4$ dimensions? In the next section we analyze the particular case of $d=5$ and explore a HL-like deviation of the Curtright action for a mixed symmetry gauge field, the latter being the dual of the graviton in that case.
\section{HL-like deviation of Curtright action\label{sec:Curtright}}
The field redefinition (\ref{eq:fieldred}) in $d=5$ is $T_{ab|c}\equiv\frac{1}{3!}\epsilon_{abdef}X^{def|}{}_{c}$. The dual action defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:hordual}) in these variables is written
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:CurtrightallaHL}
S_{\lambda}^{*}[T,Z]=\int\mathrm{d}^5x\cal{L}_{\lambda}[T,Z]=\\
\int\mathrm{d}^5x \Bigl( \cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}[T]+ \cal{M}[T,Z]+\frac{2}{3}(\theta -1)(\partial_{i} Z^{i})^{2} \Bigr),
\end{multline}
where
\begin{multline*}
\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}[T] = \partial_{a}T_{bc|d}\partial^{a}T^{bc|d}-\partial^{a}T_{bc|a}\partial_{d}T^{bc|d}
\\-2\partial_{a}T_{bc|}{}^{c}\partial^{a}T^{bd|}{}_{d} -4\partial^{a}T_{bc|a}\partial^{b}T^{cd|}{}_{d}\\
-2\partial_{a}T^{ac|d}\partial^{b}T_{bc|d}
+2\partial_{a}T^{ac|}{}_{c}\partial_{b}T^{bd|}{}_{d}
\end{multline*}
is the Curtright Lagrangian \cite{Cu}. When $\lambda=\theta=1$, we know this Lagrangian is invariant under arbitrary shifts of the $Z^{ab}$ variables, and so the term $\cal{M}[T,Z]$ can be cast out. This is not the case for the action (\ref{eq:CurtrightallaHL}): Because of the form of the last term, $Z^{ij}$ and $Z^{i}_\perp$ components are still pure gauge, but not $Z^i_\parallel$. In the following we assume we have gotten rid of the pure gauge components.
To take out of the picture the $Z^i$ variables and obtain a reduced theory just for the mixed symmetry $T_{ab|c}$, we impose a condition $\rho^{*}=\partial_i Z^i+\varrho[T]=0$ analogous to Eq. (\ref{eq:magneticcond}). So, by a HL-like deviation of the Curtright action we mean the above Lagrangian together with such a condition.
The function $\rho^{*}$ should be first order in derivatives (we want a second order reduced theory when we enforce $\rho^{*}=0$ into $\cal{L}_{\lambda}[T,Z]$) and involve $\eta_{ij}$ traces of the space and time components of $T_{ab|c}$. At the same time we expect that demanding preservation of such condition by the gauge transformations of the action (\ref{eq:CurtrightallaHL}) will restrict some of those symmetries.
The gauge symmetries of $\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}[T,Z]$, besides the shifts (\ref{eq:dgaugsymmf}), include the following transformations of the $T_{ab|c}$ fields:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:symmCu}
\delta T_{ab|c}=\partial_{[a}S_{b]c}+\frac{2}{3}(\partial_{[a}A_{b]c}-\partial_{c}A_{ab}).
\end{equation}
Transformations given in Eq. (\ref{eq:dgaugsymmh}) can be recast in this form by realizing that the parameters can be written as $\phi^{abcd|}{}_{e}=-\epsilon^{abcdf}\chi_{fe}$ and using the separation $\chi_{ab}=S_{ab}+A_{ab}$, with $S_{ab}=S_{ba}$ and $A_{ab}=-A_{ba}$. The identity $T_{[ab|c]}=0$ has been implemented, and hence the third piece of Eq. (\ref{eq:symmCu}) (see \cite{BoCnHe,GaKn}).
To build the function $\varrho[T]$ within $\rho^{*}=\partial_i Z^i+\varrho$, we first separate $\partial_{d}T_{ab|c}$ into space and time components, and then we observe that there are just three terms that can be used to form the traces of the desired form:
\begin{equation*}
\dot{T}_{0i|j},\qquad \partial_{i}T_{0j|0},\qquad\text{and}\qquad \partial_{i}T_{jk|l}.
\end{equation*}
These are
\begin{equation*}
\dot{T}_{0},\qquad \partial^{i}T_{0i|0},\qquad\text{and}\qquad \partial^{i}T_{i},
\end{equation*}
where $T_{a}\equiv T_{a i|}{}^i=T_{a i|j}\eta^{ij}$ (analogous to $T=T_i{}^i$, the trace of $T_{ij}$ in $d=4$). Finally, we define $\varrho$ as the general linear combination
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:condmagCu}
\varrho=\upsilon_{1}\dot{T}_{0}+\upsilon_{2}\partial^{i}T_{i}+\upsilon_{3}\partial^{i}T_{0i|0}.
\end{equation}
The variation of $\rho^{*}=0$ gives
\begin{align*}
0=\delta\rho^{*}=&\cancelto{0}{\delta(\partial_{i}Z^{i})} \\
&+\frac12\Bigl(\upsilon_{1}\ddot{S}+\upsilon_{2}(\eta^{ij}\Delta-\partial^{i}\partial^{j})S_{ij}\Bigr) -\frac12\upsilon_{3}\Delta S_{00} \\
&+\frac12(\upsilon_{3}-\upsilon_{1})\partial^{i}\dot{S}_{0i}-(\upsilon_{3}+\upsilon_{1})\partial^{i}\dot{A}_{0i}.
\end{align*}
Here $S\equiv\eta^{ij}S_{ij}$. This is definitely more complicated than Eq. (\ref{eq:timerep}) for the $d=4$ case, but we immediately see that the choice $\upsilon_{3}=-\upsilon_{1}$ makes $\rho^{*}$ invariant under the gauge transformations with parameters $A_{ab}$, and poses a differential equation on the parameters $S_{ab}$. This differential equation can be written
\begin{equation*}
2\upsilon_{1}\eta^{ij}\partial_{[0}S_{i][j,0]} -\frac{\upsilon_{2}}{2}(\partial^{i}\partial^{j}S_{ij}-\Delta S)=0
\end{equation*}
(the ``$,$'' at the end of the first term means partial derivative).
The combination given in Eq. (\ref{eq:condmagCu}) is not unfamiliar: For $\upsilon_1=1$, $\upsilon_2=0$, and $\upsilon_3=-2$, $\varrho=0$ matches with a component of the gauge fixing condition that is imposed on the Lagrangian EoM coming from $\cal{L}_{\text{{\scriptsize C}}}[T]$ to get the wave equation $\square T_{ab|c}=0$\footnote{In other words, this choice would be the analogue of the transverse-traceless gauge.} [see eq. (16) in \cite{Cu}]. The choice $\upsilon_{3}=-\upsilon_{1}$ is a different gauge, and will deliver a nonrelativistic wave equation.
We will not go further in the analysis of this deviation of the Curtright action in the present work. A proper study of nonrelativistic deviations of this theory deserves its own space.
\section{Summary and conclusions\label{sec:conclu}}
In this work the powerful tool of parental actions to construct duality relations in classical field theories has been implemented in a nonrelativistic theory of gravity. We followed the scheme of the authors of \cite{BoCnHe}, and hence we proceeded in two steps. First we constructed a covariant action in the \textit{vielbein} basis defined with the Lagrangian $\cal{L}_\lambda[e_{ab}]$, which entails a deviation from FP theory in the framelike formalism [see Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorlin})] and that in an appropriate gauge reduces to linearized HL gravity. The gauge fixing (\ref{eq:HLgaugefixcond}) is such that it breaks the diffeomorphism invariance to a subgroup, precisely the group of foliation preserving diffeomorphisms of HL gravity (in the linear approximation). In a second step we found a parent action defined with Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}), from which both $\cal{L}_\lambda[e_{ab}]$ and its dual partner Eq. (\ref{eq:hordual}) can be derived. The further gauge fixing (\ref{eq:magneticcond}) on the dual branch left us with the magnetic dual of linearized HL gravity. We observed that the gauge fixing in both sides of the duality was just realizations of the CMC gauge.
We found that the magnetic dual of linearized HL gravity in $d=4$ has the same structure as the electric theory, and moreover that for the value $\lambda=\frac{7}{27}$ of the characteristic parameter, the theory is self-dual. This example shows then that self-duality is not tied to Lorentz invariance. In the case of $d=5$, we suggested a nonrelativistic deviation of the Curtright action by imposing a gauge fixing condition analogous to the one used in the case of $d=4$. Breaking Lorentz invariance at the linearized level in this way might unlock nonlinear extensions \textit{á la} Ho\v{r}ava of the Curtright action. A different approach for such a nonrelativistic deformation could arise from studying a deviation similar to Lagrangian (\ref{eq:lagrhorpo}) but in the parent action proposed by the authors of \cite{BoHo} to implement duality in nonlinear Einstein theory.
Finally, we want to make an observation based on the result reported here for the dual of linearized HL gravity with characteristic parameter $\lambda$. In $d=4$ the magnetic dual theory for the dual graviton was found to have a Lagrangian with the same structure as the electric linearized HL gravity for the graviton. Its characteristic parameter $\gamma$ given in (\ref{eq:gamma}), however, is in general different from $\lambda$. With the theory for the dual graviton having the same (tensorial) structure as the theory for the graviton, we can take the magnetic theory as input in the bottom of the left branch of the diagram depicted in Fig. \ref{fig:approach}, \textit{i.e.}, as an electric theory, to perform a sort of iteration process.
The output of this iteration will be a theory with the same structure as linearized HL gravity again, but the characteristic parameter will be given by
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:gammap}
\gamma'\equiv 1+\frac29\Bigl(\frac{1-\gamma(\lambda)}{3\gamma(\lambda)-1}\Bigr),
\end{equation}
with $\gamma'\neq\lambda$. This iteration process is of course only possible in $d=4$, where the magnetic theory (the output) possesses the same tensorial structure as the original electric theory (the input). It is clear that in $d=5$, for example, this iteration exercise cannot be performed.
The same kind of iteration exercise can be thought of in the relativistic $\lambda=1$ case. There, however, the output not only possesses the same structure but also the same value of the characteristic parameter. The same happens with the nonrelativistic theory with $\lambda=\frac{7}{27}$. These two values behave then like ``equilibrium points'' of the iteration. Hence, in $d=4$ and after any number of iterations when $\lambda\neq 1,\frac{7}{27}$, the output will be always linearized HL gravity with a different parameter each time.
\begin{figure}[ht!]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.45]{./fig4v4.png}
\end{center}
\caption{\textsf{\small{Sample of three iterations starting in $\lambda=-0.15$.}}}\label{fig:g11}
\end{figure}
The peculiarity that we want to mention is that the parameters resulting after each iteration come closer and closer to 1. This value is a sort of `stable equilibrium point', while $\lambda=\frac{7}{27}$ is an `unstable equilibrium point', because in contrast to the former, the values of the parameters resulting from successive iterations run away from it. In Fig.~\ref{fig:g11} a picture of the generic behavior is presented. The same results no matter what the initial value of $\lambda$ is, with the exceptions of the equilibrium points, and of any value that after a finite number of dualizations gives $\frac{1}{3}$, for which the duality map is ill defined. We do not know what the content of this curious behavior is, the study of which we leave for future work.
The nonrelativistic model we used for this exploration was a linearized Lagrangian in flat spacetime. It would be interesting to perform the same analysis within (a)dS or Lifshitz backgrounds. This could be of interest, perhaps, for recent discussions regarding the nonrelativistic holographic correspondence \cite{JaKa,GrHoMe-Th}.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
I.C. thanks Riccardo Argurio, Glenn Barnich, and Gustavo Lucena Gómez for useful discussions during the elaboration of this work. I.C. also thanks Nicolas Boulanger and Dmitry Ponomarev for discussions and comments on the results. This work is partially supported by SEP-CONACyT CB-2008-104649 grant (Mexico) \textit{Aplicaciones de la teor\'ia de cuerdas al plasma de quarks y gluones}. The work of I.C. is partially supported by CONACyT (Mexico) through the \textit{Estancias Sab\'aticas y Posdoctorales al Extranjero para la Consolidaci\'on de Grupos de Investigaci\'on} program, by IISN - Belgium (conventions 4.4511.06 and 4.4514.08), by the \textit{Communaut\'e Fran\c{c}aise de Belgique} through the ARC program and by the ERC through the ``SyDuGraM'' Advanced Grant.
|
Subsets and Splits