Case ID
stringlengths 8
10
| Case Name
stringlengths 21
57
| Date
stringlengths 10
10
| Court
stringclasses 1
value | Judges
stringlengths 22
35
| Legal Principles
stringlengths 25
104
| Summary
stringlengths 45
224
| Judgment Text
stringlengths 20
103
| Citations
float64 | Outcome
stringlengths 12
53
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
913/2022
|
Indian Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu
|
20-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Microfinance norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with microfinance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
914/2022
|
Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala
|
25-05-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Internal control norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with internal control norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
914/2022
|
ABC Industries vs. Union of India
|
01-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant
|
Industrial dispute and labor law compliance.
|
The petitioner challenged the labor law compliance requirements. The Supreme Court upheld the requirements.
|
Compliance requirements were upheld.
| null |
Requirements upheld.
|
915/2022
|
Yes Bank vs. State of Telangana
|
30-06-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Payment gateway norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with payment gateway norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
915/2022
|
State of Gujarat vs. XYZ Ltd.
|
05-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai
|
Environmental law and corporate responsibility.
|
The case involved a dispute over environmental pollution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.
|
The corporation was held responsible.
| null |
Corporation held responsible.
|
916/2022
|
IndusInd Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
|
05-07-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Capital adequacy norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with capital adequacy norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
916/2022
|
DEF Bank vs. State of Maharashtra
|
10-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta
|
Banking regulations and customer rights.
|
The petitioner challenged banking fees. The Supreme Court upheld the fees.
|
Banking fees were upheld.
| null |
Fees upheld.
|
917/2022
|
Dhanlaxmi Bank vs. State of Jharkhand
|
10-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Credit risk management norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
917/2022
|
GHI Corporation vs. Employees Union
|
15-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli
|
Employment law and workers' rights.
|
The case involved a dispute over employee benefits. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees.
|
Employee benefits were granted.
| null |
Benefits granted.
|
918/2022
|
Karnataka Bank vs. State of Odisha
|
15-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Operational risk management norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with operational risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
918/2022
|
State of Karnataka vs. PQR Constructions
|
20-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Contract law and state contracts.
|
The petitioner challenged contract termination. The Supreme Court upheld the termination.
|
Contract termination was upheld.
| null |
Termination upheld.
|
919/2022
|
Federal Bank vs. State of Assam
|
20-10-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Liquidity management norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with liquidity management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
919/2022
|
LMN Enterprises vs. State of Rajasthan
|
25-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy
|
Corporate taxation and state taxes.
|
The petitioner challenged state tax assessment. The Supreme Court upheld the assessment.
|
Tax assessment was upheld.
| null |
Assessment upheld.
|
920/2022
|
City Union Bank vs. State of Tripura
|
25-11-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Customer service norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with customer service norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
920/2022
|
OPQ Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu
|
30-03-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari
|
Land acquisition and compensation.
|
The petitioner challenged land compensation amount. The Supreme Court revised the compensation.
|
Compensation was revised.
| null |
Compensation revised.
|
921/2019
|
Punjab National Bank vs. State of Rajasthan
|
30-08-2019
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna
|
Banking fraud and liability. Bank's duty of care towards customers.
|
The bank challenged a ruling holding it liable for a fraudulent transaction. The Supreme Court upheld the liability, emphasizing the bank's duty of care towards its customers.
|
The bank was held liable and directed to compensate the affected customers.
| null |
Liability upheld; compensation ordered.
|
921/2022
|
State of Punjab vs. JKL Industries
|
05-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose
|
Industrial safety and state regulations.
|
The case involved a dispute over safety regulations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.
|
Safety regulations were upheld.
| null |
Regulations upheld.
|
922/2022
|
South Indian Bank vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh
|
05-01-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Financial inclusion norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial inclusion norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
922/2022
|
STU Corporation vs. Union of India
|
10-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran
|
Corporate law and regulatory compliance.
|
The petitioner challenged regulatory compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs.
|
Compliance costs were upheld.
| null |
Costs upheld.
|
923/2022
|
Lakshmi Vilas Bank vs. State of Sikkim
|
10-02-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Financial stability norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial stability norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
923/2022
|
State of Haryana vs. XYZ Bank
|
15-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
Indira Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian
|
Banking fraud and state oversight.
|
The case involved a banking fraud dispute. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.
|
The bank was held accountable.
| null |
Bank accountable.
|
924/2022
|
DEF Ltd. vs. State of Kerala
|
20-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.K. Kaul, M.M. Sundresh
|
Corporate liability and environmental impact.
|
The petitioner challenged environmental penalties. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties.
|
Penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
925/2022
|
GHI Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
|
25-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna
|
Banking regulations and state oversight.
|
The petitioner challenged state oversight measures. The Supreme Court upheld the measures.
|
Oversight measures were upheld.
| null |
Measures upheld.
|
926/2022
|
Bandhan Bank vs. State of Nagaland
|
25-05-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Financial reporting norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial reporting norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
926/2022
|
JKL Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal
|
30-04-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
K.M. Joseph, P.S. Narasimha
|
Corporate governance and state intervention.
|
The petitioner challenged state intervention in corporate governance. The Supreme Court upheld the intervention.
|
State intervention was upheld.
| null |
Intervention upheld.
|
927/2022
|
IDBI Bank vs. State of Manipur
|
30-06-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud prevention norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud prevention norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
927/2022
|
MNO Enterprises vs. State of Bihar
|
05-05-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R. Banumathi, S. Ravindra Bhat
|
Taxation laws and corporate liability.
|
The petitioner challenged a tax levy. The Supreme Court upheld the levy.
|
Tax levy was upheld.
| null |
Levy upheld.
|
928/2022
|
DCB Bank vs. State of Haryana
|
05-07-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Governance framework norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with governance framework norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
928/2022
|
PQR Corporation vs. State of Odisha
|
10-05-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar
|
Environmental regulations and corporate compliance.
|
The petitioner challenged environmental compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs.
|
Compliance costs were upheld.
| null |
Costs upheld.
|
929/2022
|
Jammu and Kashmir Bank vs. State of Maharashtra
|
10-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Risk assessment norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with risk assessment norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
930/2022
|
STU Industries vs. State of Assam
|
20-05-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant
|
Corporate taxes and state audits.
|
The petitioner challenged a state audit report. The Supreme Court upheld the audit report.
|
Audit report was upheld.
| null |
Report upheld.
|
931/2022
|
Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank vs. State of Maharashtra
|
20-10-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan
|
Banking regulations and compliance. Cooperative banking norms and penalties.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cooperative banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
944/2022
|
MNP Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra
|
01-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai
|
Corporate taxation and state taxes
|
The petitioner challenged the state's tax levy on corporate earnings.
|
The tax levy was partially reduced.
| null |
Tax levy partially reduced.
|
945/2022
|
State of Tamil Nadu vs. QRS Enterprises
|
05-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Environmental law and corporate responsibility
|
The state sued the corporation for environmental damages caused by its operations.
|
The corporation was fined and required to implement remediation measures.
| null |
Corporation fined and remediation required.
|
946/2022
|
JKL Corporation vs. Union of India
|
10-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant
|
Industrial safety standards and compliance
|
The petitioner contested the stringent safety standards imposed by the government.
|
The standards were upheld, with a timeline extension for compliance.
| null |
Standards upheld with compliance extension.
|
947/2022
|
State of Kerala vs. TUV Industries
|
15-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta
|
Labor law and workers' rights
|
The state challenged the company's unfair labor practices.
|
The company was ordered to compensate the affected workers and improve labor conditions.
| null |
Company ordered to compensate and improve conditions.
|
948/2022
|
PQR Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
|
20-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli
|
Banking regulations and customer protection
|
The bank contested penalties for violating customer protection laws.
|
The penalties were upheld, with an additional fine imposed for repeated violations.
| null |
Penalties and additional fine imposed.
|
949/2022
|
State of Karnataka vs. XYZ Ltd.
|
25-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy
|
Environmental regulations and industrial operations
|
The state filed a case against the company for environmental degradation.
|
The company was ordered to halt operations until compliance with environmental standards.
| null |
Operations halted until compliance.
|
950/2022
|
ABC Enterprises vs. State of Haryana
|
30-08-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Corporate law and mergers
|
The petitioner challenged the state's rejection of a proposed corporate merger.
|
The rejection was overturned, allowing the merger to proceed.
| null |
Merger allowed.
|
951/2022
|
State of Punjab vs. DEF Ltd.
|
05-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant
|
Tax evasion and corporate responsibility
|
The state accused the company of tax evasion.
|
The company was found guilty and ordered to pay back taxes with penalties.
| null |
Company found guilty and penalized.
|
952/2022
|
GHI Ltd. vs. State of Bihar
|
10-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai
|
Corporate governance and state oversight
|
The petitioner contested the state's interference in corporate governance.
|
The interference was deemed necessary and lawful.
| null |
State interference deemed lawful.
|
953/2022
|
LMN Bank vs. State of Rajasthan
|
15-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli
|
Banking fraud and regulatory oversight
|
The bank challenged the state's fraud investigation procedures.
|
The investigation procedures were upheld.
| null |
Investigation procedures upheld.
|
954/2022
|
State of Gujarat vs. OPQ Ltd.
|
20-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy
|
Environmental law and corporate responsibility
|
The state sued the company for environmental violations.
|
The company was fined and required to implement corrective measures.
| null |
Company fined and corrective measures required.
|
955/2022
|
State of Assam vs. RST Enterprises
|
25-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha
|
Corporate governance and regulatory compliance
|
The state challenged the company's governance practices.
|
The company's practices were found compliant, and the case was dismissed.
| null |
Case dismissed, practices compliant.
|
956/2022
|
UVW Ltd. vs. Union of India
|
30-09-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant
|
Industrial law and labor disputes
|
The petitioner challenged the labor union's strike action.
|
The strike was declared illegal and the union was fined.
| null |
Strike declared illegal, union fined.
|
957/2022
|
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. XYZ Ltd.
|
05-10-2022
|
Supreme Court of India
|
U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta
|
Environmental impact and industrial operations
|
The state sued the company for excessive environmental damage.
|
The company was ordered to cease operations and pay for environmental restoration.
| null |
Operations ceased, restoration ordered.
|
987/2020
|
Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana
|
22-06-2020
|
Supreme Court of India
|
N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari
|
Rights of tenants under tenancy laws. Protection from eviction.
|
The petitioner, a tenant, challenged her eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tenant, reinforcing the protection from eviction under the Act.
|
The eviction order was set aside, and the tenant was granted protection.
| null |
Eviction order set aside; tenant protected.
|
987/2023
|
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka
|
22-02-2023
|
Supreme Court of India
|
U.U. Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat
|
Industrial regulations and compliance. Environmental impact assessments.
|
The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of adhering to environmental norms.
|
The penalties were upheld.
| null |
Penalties upheld.
|
998/2019
|
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra
|
17-07-2019
|
Supreme Court of India
|
Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha
|
Dispute over electricity tariffs. Regulatory powers of state electricity boards.
|
The petitioner challenged the tariff rates set by the state electricity board. The Supreme Court upheld the regulatory authority's power to set tariffs, affirming the rates as reasonable and justified.
|
The tariff rates were upheld.
| null |
Tariff rates upheld.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.