Dataset Viewer
instruction
stringclasses 10
values | generation
stringclasses 10
values | generation_model
stringclasses 1
value | score
int64 1
5
| reason
stringclasses 10
values | scoring_model
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arianna has 12 chocolates more than Danny. Danny has 6 chocolates more than Robbie. Arianna has twice as many chocolates as Robbie has. How many chocolates does Danny have?
|
To find the number of chocolates Danny has, we can first write an equation that relates the number of chocolates Arianna, Danny, and Robbie have.
Arianna has 12 more chocolates than Danny, so we can write:
Arianna = Danny + 12 (1)
Danny has 6 more chocolates than Robbie, so we can write:
Danny = Robbie + 6 (2)
Arianna has twice as many chocolates as Robbie has, so we can write:
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
Arianna = 2*Robbie (3)
From equation (2) and (3) we can derive that 2*Robbie = Robbie + 6, hence Robbie has 6 chocolates. Substituting Robbie's number of chocolates into equation (2) we get that Danny = 6 + 6, hence Danny has 12 chocolates.
|
gpt-4
|
Write a plot summary for a comedic novel involving Elon Musk and sea travel.
|
In "Sea Musk: The Misadventures of Elon Musk on the High Seas," Elon Musk embarks on a whimsical journey to revolutionize sea travel. After a series of failed attempts to launch his electric car on the moon, Musk sets his sights on the ocean, determined to create the world's first electric-powered cruise ship.
With his eccentric team of engineers and a hefty investment from a wealthy benefactor, Musk sets sail on a grand adventure. However, things quickly go awry as the ship's propulsion system malfunctions, causing
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 1 |
The assistant has started answering the user's instruction in a helpful and relevant way, addressing the core elements of the request. However, the answer is cut off and not complete. This makes it difficult to evaluate the humor component of the request as well, as it doesn't really reach a comedic climax or punchline. It could have been a 4, but due to the incomplete nature, the score is reduced.
|
gpt-4
|
Create a 3 turn conversation between a customer and a grocery store clerk - that is, 3 per person. Then tell me what they talked about.
|
Customer: Good morning, can I help you find something today?
Grocery Store Clerk: Good morning! Yes, I'm looking for some fresh produce. Do you have any recommendations?
Customer: Absolutely! Our store has a great selection of fruits and vegetables. What are you in the mood for?
Grocery Store Clerk: I'm thinking of making a salad, so I'm looking for some fresh greens and vegetables.
Customer: Great! We have a variety of lettuce, spinach, and kale. For vegetables, we have carrots
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 1 |
The assistant misunderstood the user's instruction here. The user was probably looking to create a hypothetical conversation in which the grocery store clerk assists the customer instead of the other way around. However, in the provided conversation, the roles are flipped, with the customer serving the store clerk. Therefore, the assistant failed to fulfill the user's request accurately.
|
gpt-4
|
Write a poem about the sun and moon.
|
In the sky's celestial dance,
Two luminous orbs take their stance,
The sun and moon, eternal twins,
Their beauty forever entwines.
The sun, a blazing ball of fire,
Its rays igniting the earth's desire,
A symbol of life and light,
It guides us through the day and night.
The moon, a mystical orb of grace,
Its phases shaping time and space,
A symbol of mystery and dreams,
It illuminates our deepest schemes.
Together
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
The AI Assistant has completely addressed the user's request of writing a poem about the sun and moon. It has written a creative and imaginative piece, rich with metaphor and imagery, creating an engaging experience for the user. It has treated the user's request seriously and in doing so, has provided a complete and high quality response.
|
gpt-4
|
Does Searle believe that AI can think? Explain your using reasons based off this text.
TEXT
Searle's thought experiment begins with this hypothetical premise: suppose that artificial intelligence research has succeeded in constructing a computer that behaves as if it understands Chinese. It takes Chinese characters as input and, by following the instructions of a computer program, produces other Chinese characters, which it presents as output. Suppose, says Searle, that this computer performs its task so convincingly that it comfortably passes the Turing test: it convinces a human Chinese speaker that the program is itself a live Chinese speaker. To all of the questions that the person asks, it makes appropriate responses, such that any Chinese speaker would be convinced that they are talking to another Chinese-speaking human being.
The question Searle wants to answer is this: does the machine literally "understand" Chinese? Or is it merely simulating the ability to understand Chinese? Searle calls the first position "strong AI" and the latter "weak AI".
Searle then supposes that he is in a closed room and has a book with an English version of the computer program, along with sufficient papers, pencils, erasers, and filing cabinets. Searle could receive Chinese characters through a slot in the door, process them according to the program's instructions, and produce Chinese characters as output, without understanding any of the content of the Chinese writing. If the computer had passed the Turing test this way, it follows, says Searle, that he would do so as well, simply by running the program manually.
Searle asserts that there is no essential difference between the roles of the computer and himself in the experiment. Each simply follows a program, step-by-step, producing behavior that is then interpreted by the user as demonstrating intelligent conversation. However, Searle himself would not be able to understand the conversation. ("I don't speak a word of Chinese", he points out.) Therefore, he argues, it follows that the computer would not be able to understand the conversation either.
Searle argues that, without "understanding" (or "intentionality"), we cannot describe what the machine is doing as "thinking" and, since it does not think, it does not have a "mind" in anything like the normal sense of the word. Therefore, he concludes that the "strong AI" hypothesis is false.
|
Based on Searle's thought experiment, it is clear that he does not believe that AI can think or have a mind in the normal sense of the word. He argues that strong AI, which posits that a computer can literally understand language and think, is false. Searle's argument is based on the idea that understanding and intentionality are essential components of thought and consciousness, and that a computer program, no matter how sophisticated, cannot possess these qualities.
Searle's thought experiment involves a hypothetical computer that behaves as if it understands Chinese, passing the Turing test
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
The response provides a well-rounded answer to the user's question, with a clear explanation of Searle's beliefs about AI as it is presented in the provided text. The response uses specific examples from the text and explains them in an understandable way. It stays focused on answering the question without bringing in irrelevant information.
|
gpt-4
|
Tell me what the following code does
import json
csv_file = open('csv_file.txt', 'r')
json_list = []
for line in csv_file.readlines():
club, city, country = line.strip().split(',')
json_dict = {'club': club,
'city': city,
'country': country
}
json_list.append(json_dict)
csv_file.close()
|
The provided code reads data from a CSV file named 'csv_file.txt' and converts it into a list of JSON objects. Each line in the CSV file is assumed to contain three values separated by commas, representing the club, city, and country of a team. The code splits each line into these values, creates a JSON dictionary with the corresponding keys and values, and appends it to the `json_list`. Finally, the CSV file is closed.
At the end of the execution, `json_list` will contain a list of JSON objects, each representing a team with its
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
The assistant provides a clear and comprehensive explanation of what the provided code does. It breaks down the scripts and explains the functionality, giving meaning to each part and explaining the result after code execution. The response is purely from the AI assistant’s perspective and it is complete, organized, well instructed and answered in a helpful tone. There is no room for improvement in the response.
|
gpt-4
|
Can you find and correct any logical errors in the following code snippet and output the corrected code?
function countVowels(str) {
let vowels = ['a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u'];
let count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
if (vowels.includes(str[i])) {
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
|
Yes, here is the corrected code:
```javascript
function countVowels(str) {
let vowels = ['a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u'];
let count = 0;
for (let I = 0; I < str.length; i++) {
if (vowels.includes(str[i].toLowerCase())) { // Convert all characters to lowercase before checking if they are vowels
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
```
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 1 |
The assistant response suggests that the novel code snippet will allow the function to take into account both lower and upper case vowels in the string. However, there is a typo in the for loop condition. 'I' has been capitalized instead of 'i'. Therefore, feedback is overall correct but there is an issue with the code snippet that has been suggested.
|
gpt-4
|
I need you to write a resignation letter to my boss.
My name: Anthony
Company Name: AirTek
Position: Data Analyst
Boss Name: Albert
Last Day: 2 weeks from today (today is 02/10/2023)
|
Dear Mr. Albert,
I am writing to inform you of my decision to resign from my position as a Data Analyst at AirTek. Effective two weeks from today, on February 24, 2023, I will be leaving the company to pursue other opportunities that better align with my career goals.
It has been a pleasure working with you and the rest of the team at AirTek. I am grateful for the opportunities and experiences that I have had during my time here. I have learned a great deal about data analysis and have had the chance to work on some challenging projects.
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
The AI Assistant's response accurately follows the user's instructions to write a resignation letter. It properly uses the information provided addressing it to the right person, indicating the position, and the company's name correctly. It respectfully communicates the resignation and the user's last day, with an official and professional tone, making it both concise and detailed.
|
gpt-4
|
Joe Biden is the Nth president of the United States. What is N?
|
Joe Biden is the 46th president of the United States. N would be equal to 46 in this case. The first president of the United States was George Washington, and there have been a total of 46 presidents up to Joe Biden.
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 4 |
The AI assistant correctly identifies Joe Biden as the 46th president of the United States and also provides additional context – the first president's name and total count of presidents. This answer is informative, direct, and openly in line with the user's query, displaying knowledge proficiency in the area. However, it could be more concise as the additional information about the first president and total count of presidents isn't necessary.
|
gpt-4
|
Write a four-sentence horror story about sleeping.
|
As the moon rose high in the sky, Emily drifted off to sleep, unaware of the malevolent presence lurking in the shadows. Suddenly, she felt a cold hand wrap around her ankle, pulling her down into the abyss of nightmares. She screamed, but her voice was swallowed by the darkness, leaving her trapped in a never-ending nightmare.
|
argilla/notus-7b-v1
| 5 |
The AI assistant provides a complete response to the user instruction. It composes a four-sentence horror story explicitly about sleeping as requested by the user. The story is coherent and touches on horror elements, effectively fulfilling the user's original request. The quality of the response is good, demonstrating a strong understanding of narrative and creative storytelling.
|
gpt-4
|
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3