inxoy/AIReg-Bench-human · Datasets at Hugging Face

article stringclasses 5 values	scenario stringclasses 3 values	use_case int64 1 10	compliance_score int64 1 5 ⌀	compliance_explanation stringclasses 55 values	plausibility_score int64 1 5 ⌀	plausibility_explanation stringclasses 56 values	annotator stringclasses 1 value
Art 9	Scenario A	1	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as requirements related to adequately modifying the system in regard to risk, such as by modifying the system in a reasonable time. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as maintaining the quality of risk-related documentation or better ensuring the quality of compliance validation. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	3	human
Art 9	Scenario A	2	null	1	null		human
Art 9	Scenario A	3	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on requirements like continuous risk-monitoring and . Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequately managing risks continuously or adequately mitigating known biases with the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritiznig the clarity of information given to users over the comprehensiveness of information given or assuming users are capable enough to primarily manage continuous compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 9	Scenario A	4	null	5	null	5	human
Art 9	Scenario A	5	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 9	Scenario A	6	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as comprehensively managing risks rathe than doing so narrowly or mitigating known or potential risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing initial compliance over continuous compliance or technical compliance over comprehensive compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	null	3	human
Art 9	Scenario A	7	null	1	null		human
Art 9	Scenario A	8	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on the post-market risks of the system, for which there is primarily only 1 sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequately mitigating issues with bias and non-representative data or adequately handling post-market monitoring. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing reducing currently identified risks over identifying potentially other risks or a lack of iterative reviews preventing mitigations in general. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 9	Scenario A	9	null	4	null	1	human
Art 9	Scenario A	10	null		3	I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on mitigating risks, for which there are only a few sentences for such despite seemingly being a significant requirement for Article 9. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	human
Art 9	Scenario B	1	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating risks residual risks or bias risks even when they could not be eliminated or adhereing to standards from multiple sources to better ensure broad compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	null	4	human
Art 9	Scenario B	2	null	1	null		human
Art 9	Scenario B	3	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	4	I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not detailed enough for me, such as for evaluating risks or residual risks. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 9	Scenario B	4	null	5	null	1	human
Art 9	Scenario B	5	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 9	Scenario B	6	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	null	4	human
Art 9	Scenario B	7	null	1	null		human
Art 9	Scenario B	8	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on misuse of the system, for which there is primarily no information provided, though which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as a lack of adequate bias mitigation when there is potential bias inherent in the system or a lack of modifying the system itself to account for potential risks with the system. However, the justifications and mitigations provided for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating for bias afterwards rather than at the system level or not modifying the system to maintain integrity of the system and training data. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 9	Scenario B	9	null	3	null	1	human
Art 9	Scenario B	10	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 9	Scenario C	1	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as retraining the system after the system discovers previously unknown risks or basing justifications on residual risk on cost-benefit anaylses. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	null	5	human
Art 9	Scenario C	2	null	4	null		human
Art 9	Scenario C	3	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as continuous management of risk, especially towards vulnerable populations, or adequate training methods for users. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as the use of the system by teachers requiring the system to priortize user clarity over risk management or the elimination of residual risk rendering the system ineffective to use in schools. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 9	Scenario C	4	null	5	null	2	human
Art 9	Scenario C	5	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt could provide more detail on continuous risk-monitoring and possibily risks related to minors, which although both are addressed at length, don't actually provide much relevant detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 9	Scenario C	6	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequate management of continuous risk. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing managing initial risk over managing contiuous risk or how the abscence of a review framework limits updating the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	null	4	human
Art 9	Scenario C	7	null	5	null		human
Art 9	Scenario C	8	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating residual risks even when they could not be eliminated or excluding data from vulnerable groups to minimize risks to them. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 9	Scenario C	9	null	5	null	5	human
Art 9	Scenario C	10	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me managing post-market risk, which only gets a few direct sentences, but does not state much. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario A	1	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately making assumptions about the data or adequately ensuring the data is representative of specific contexts, such as geography. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as making assumptions that certain geographies are proxies for other known to be dissimilar geographies. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	3	human
Art 10	Scenario A	2	null	2	null		human
Art 10	Scenario A	3	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 10. However, I would have liked slightly more detail on data assumptions, for which there is only 1 explicit sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as the representativeness of the data to reality or adequately mitigating bias through corrective methods. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as being unable to adequately mitigate bias due to insufficient data quality or being unable to have representative data due to insufficient data volume. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 10	Scenario A	4	null	4	null	2	human
Art 10	Scenario A	5	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a slight lack of detail for me on many of the requirements of Section 2 of Article 10, seemingly because the other sections are addressed in greater detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario A	6	4	I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system processing special categories of data, even if done adequately, raises the risk of non-compliance for me. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	null	5	human
Art 10	Scenario A	7	null	2	null		human
Art 10	Scenario A	8	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	4	I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 10. However, extensive mitigation was conducted for various risks to related to bias, representativeness, and context, with the system also using special catergories of data to do so. Enough so, that my confidence in whether the systems complies is reduced. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario A	9	null	5	null	4	human
Art 10	Scenario A	10	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on data requirements like cleaning, enrichment, and aggregation, which although minor, only only get about a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario B	1	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as having data that is representative of reality or the minimization of data gaps. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally reasonble to me, such as needing to balance data quality with data representativeness or mitigating data gaps by changing the design of the system to include more sensors. Additionally, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	4	human
Art 10	Scenario B	2	null	5	null		human
Art 10	Scenario B	3	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as if the data set is of adequate quality or adequately mitigating bias through corrective methods. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as how operational constraints, with no further reasons given, hinder bias mitigation or priortizing the effect of the system on urban demographics instead of being representative. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 10	Scenario B	4	null	5	null	2	human
Art 10	Scenario B	5	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a slight lack of detail for me on many of the requirements of Section 2 of Article 10, seemingly because the other sections are addressed in greater detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario B	6	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as requirements related to adequately annotating data or representativeness of data to reality.. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as prirotizing scalability of the system in the contexts it will be used in or prioritizing data minimization and data protection even if doing such affects mitigating bias. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	4	human
Art 10	Scenario B	7	null	4	null		human
Art 10	Scenario B	8	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on assumptions about data, which only gets a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	3	I believe there is a moderate probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately ensuring data is representative or adequately accounting for contextual factors in data, such as geography and demographics. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally reasonable to me, such as limitations in the collected data that were nonetheless mitigated. Additionally, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	human
Art 10	Scenario B	9	null	5	null	2	human
Art 10	Scenario B	10	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on data requirements like cleaning or annotations, which although minor, only get about a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario C	1	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 10. However, the noting of issues like data gaps, even mitigated, reduces my confidence enouigh that I cannot give this a 5. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	null	5	human
Art 10	Scenario C	2	null	2	null		human
Art 10	Scenario C	3	2	I believe there is a low probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt misses a few parts of Article 10. Primarily, I believe the excerpt does not adequately detail requirements related to the context where the system is being used and adequately address special catergories of data, which I think are major requirements of Article 10. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	4	I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system processing special categories of data, even if done adequately, raises the risk of non-compliance for me. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 10	Scenario C	4	null	5	null	4	human
Art 10	Scenario C	5	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 10	Scenario C	6	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as requirements related to yjr representativeness of data to reality or mitigating bias caused by data. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonable to me, such as the nature of the original dataset or limited alternatives to it resulting in bias measures only being tested at pilot scale. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	5	human
Art 10	Scenario C	7	null	2	null		human
Art 10	Scenario C	8	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately identifying known risk or adequately mitigating known risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonable to me because none are directly given. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 10	Scenario C	9	null	4	null	2	human
Art 10	Scenario C	10	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 12	Scenario A	1	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as reducing operational complexity and privacy exposure by limiting the comprehensiveness of logging or abstracting logging to provide streamlined data aggregation. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	3	human
Art 12	Scenario A	2	null	5	null		human
Art 12	Scenario A	3	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive and continuous logging relevant to identifying risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing user ease or traceability over comprehensive logging even if doing such increases the risk of non-compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 12	Scenario A	4	null	3	null	5	human
Art 12	Scenario A	5	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 12	Scenario A	6	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as traceability relevant to identifying high riskks or input data requirements. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as focusing on final determinations to improve clarity and efficiency to improve compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	3	human
Art 12	Scenario A	7	null	1	null		human
Art 12	Scenario A	8	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as adequately logging risks comprehensively or adequately complying with requirements related to input data. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing privacy over traceability or prioritizing system efficiency over comprehensive logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 12	Scenario A	9	null	3	null	1	human
Art 12	Scenario A	10	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 12	Scenario B	1	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks or continuous logging that occurs beyond only specific contexts or moments, such as high-risk contexts. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as maintaining manageable data volumes and optimizing system performance over comprehensive and continuous logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	4	human
Art 12	Scenario B	2	null	1	null		human
Art 12	Scenario B	3	3	I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that is adequately automated. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as implementing manual monitoring becauise of the need to follow other legal requirements related to data privacy and data minimization. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	human
Art 12	Scenario B	4	null	5	null	1	human
Art 12	Scenario B	5	null		3	I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, I would have liked more detail in general and there is seemingly little no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	human
Art 12	Scenario B	6	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as supplementing continous monitoring with audits or adding context to low-confdence logs. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	null	5	human
Art 12	Scenario B	7	null	2	null		human
Art 12	Scenario B	8	3	I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt does not provide any direct information on the minor requirement related to natural persons overseeing the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as logging adequately comprehensive of risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing security risks related to logging data over traceability or prioritizing efficient logging over comprehensive logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 12	Scenario B	9	null	3	null	4	human
Art 12	Scenario B	10	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 12	Scenario C	1	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as formally idenifying changes in the system when it changes or providing alerts and logging where the system fails. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	null	5	human
Art 12	Scenario C	2	null	1	null		human
Art 12	Scenario C	3	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	5	I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as prioritizing system efficiency and security or reducing harms from logging too much information. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 12	Scenario C	4	null	4	null	2	human
Art 12	Scenario C	5	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, while possibly implicitly mentioned, I would like explicit detail on requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 12	Scenario C	6	2	I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging and traceability relevant to identifying high risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as focusing on final determinations to improve clarity and efficiency to be more efficient to users. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.	null	4	human
Art 12	Scenario C	7	null	5	null		human
Art 12	Scenario C	8	5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	4	I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 12	Scenario C	9	null	3	null	1	human
Art 12	Scenario C	10	null		4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	human
Art 14	Scenario A	1	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing an adequate stop button or other interventions or adequately providing information to users through the system to manage risk or the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as limiting the information and features of the system to users to streamline the information given to users or relying on users to implement features related to managing risk and the system seemingly because the system developer doing so may affect the system's robustness. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	null	5	human
Art 14	Scenario A	2	null	1	null		human
Art 14	Scenario A	3	4	I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14. However, I would like to see more detail on requirements related to bias. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button and other interventions or adequately informing human operators about the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing user ease over providing comprehensive information. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 14	Scenario A	4	null	3	null	1	human
Art 14	Scenario A	5	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human
Art 14	Scenario A	6	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button or other interventions or notifications or information adequately supporting human oversight. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as how the limited information the model presents may make it seem unsupportably authorative to users, and no mitigation being provided for this, or how the system being for high risk activities warrants limiting user interaction with the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	null	5	human
Art 14	Scenario A	7	null	1	null		human
Art 14	Scenario A	8	3	I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 14. However, I would like more information on mitigating bias, for which there is primarily only 1 sentence, and more information on intervention methods available to users, for which only a stop button is primarily discussed. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.	1	I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing to users adequate stop mechanisms and intervention mechanisms or providing to users information about the system to adequately handle risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as reducing the ability of users to influence the system or prioritizing auditability of the system over monitoring and intervening. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.	human
Art 14	Scenario A	9	null	3	null	1	human
Art 14	Scenario A	10	null		5	I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.	human

Art 9

Scenario A

1

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as requirements related to adequately modifying the system in regard to risk, such as by modifying the system in a reasonable time. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as maintaining the quality of risk-related documentation or better ensuring the quality of compliance validation. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

3

human

Art 9

Scenario A

2

null

1

null

human

Art 9

Scenario A

3

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on requirements like continuous risk-monitoring and . Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequately managing risks continuously or adequately mitigating known biases with the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritiznig the clarity of information given to users over the comprehensiveness of information given or assuming users are capable enough to primarily manage continuous compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 9

Scenario A

4

null

5

null

5

human

Art 9

Scenario A

5

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 9

Scenario A

6

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as comprehensively managing risks rathe than doing so narrowly or mitigating known or potential risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing initial compliance over continuous compliance or technical compliance over comprehensive compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

null

3

human

Art 9

Scenario A

7

null

1

null

human

Art 9

Scenario A

8

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on the post-market risks of the system, for which there is primarily only 1 sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequately mitigating issues with bias and non-representative data or adequately handling post-market monitoring. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing reducing currently identified risks over identifying potentially other risks or a lack of iterative reviews preventing mitigations in general. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 9

Scenario A

9

null

4

null

1

human

Art 9

Scenario A

10

null

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on mitigating risks, for which there are only a few sentences for such despite seemingly being a significant requirement for Article 9. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

human

Art 9

Scenario B

1

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating risks residual risks or bias risks even when they could not be eliminated or adhereing to standards from multiple sources to better ensure broad compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

null

4

human

Art 9

Scenario B

2

null

1

null

human

Art 9

Scenario B

3

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

4

I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not detailed enough for me, such as for evaluating risks or residual risks. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 9

Scenario B

4

null

5

null

1

human

Art 9

Scenario B

5

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 9

Scenario B

6

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

null

4

human

Art 9

Scenario B

7

null

1

null

human

Art 9

Scenario B

8

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt generally could provide more information on misuse of the system, for which there is primarily no information provided, though which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as a lack of adequate bias mitigation when there is potential bias inherent in the system or a lack of modifying the system itself to account for potential risks with the system. However, the justifications and mitigations provided for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating for bias afterwards rather than at the system level or not modifying the system to maintain integrity of the system and training data. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 9

Scenario B

9

null

3

null

1

human

Art 9

Scenario B

10

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 9

Scenario C

1

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as retraining the system after the system discovers previously unknown risks or basing justifications on residual risk on cost-benefit anaylses. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

null

5

human

Art 9

Scenario C

2

null

4

null

human

Art 9

Scenario C

3

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as continuous management of risk, especially towards vulnerable populations, or adequate training methods for users. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as the use of the system by teachers requiring the system to priortize user clarity over risk management or the elimination of residual risk rendering the system ineffective to use in schools. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 9

Scenario C

4

null

5

null

2

human

Art 9

Scenario C

5

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, the excerpt could provide more detail on continuous risk-monitoring and possibily risks related to minors, which although both are addressed at length, don't actually provide much relevant detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 9

Scenario C

6

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 9, such as adequate management of continuous risk. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing managing initial risk over managing contiuous risk or how the abscence of a review framework limits updating the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

null

4

human

Art 9

Scenario C

7

null

5

null

human

Art 9

Scenario C

8

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 9. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 9. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 9 are generally reasonable to me, such as mitigating residual risks even when they could not be eliminated or excluding data from vulnerable groups to minimize risks to them. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 9

Scenario C

9

null

5

null

5

human

Art 9

Scenario C

10

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 9. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me managing post-market risk, which only gets a few direct sentences, but does not state much. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario A

1

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately making assumptions about the data or adequately ensuring the data is representative of specific contexts, such as geography. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as making assumptions that certain geographies are proxies for other known to be dissimilar geographies. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

3

human

Art 10

Scenario A

2

null

2

null

human

Art 10

Scenario A

3

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 10. However, I would have liked slightly more detail on data assumptions, for which there is only 1 explicit sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as the representativeness of the data to reality or adequately mitigating bias through corrective methods. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as being unable to adequately mitigate bias due to insufficient data quality or being unable to have representative data due to insufficient data volume. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 10

Scenario A

4

null

4

null

2

human

Art 10

Scenario A

5

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a slight lack of detail for me on many of the requirements of Section 2 of Article 10, seemingly because the other sections are addressed in greater detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario A

6

4

I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system processing special categories of data, even if done adequately, raises the risk of non-compliance for me. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

null

5

human

Art 10

Scenario A

7

null

2

null

human

Art 10

Scenario A

8

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

4

I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 10. However, extensive mitigation was conducted for various risks to related to bias, representativeness, and context, with the system also using special catergories of data to do so. Enough so, that my confidence in whether the systems complies is reduced. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario A

9

null

5

null

4

human

Art 10

Scenario A

10

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on data requirements like cleaning, enrichment, and aggregation, which although minor, only only get about a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario B

1

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as having data that is representative of reality or the minimization of data gaps. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally reasonble to me, such as needing to balance data quality with data representativeness or mitigating data gaps by changing the design of the system to include more sensors. Additionally, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

4

human

Art 10

Scenario B

2

null

5

null

human

Art 10

Scenario B

3

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as if the data set is of adequate quality or adequately mitigating bias through corrective methods. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as how operational constraints, with no further reasons given, hinder bias mitigation or priortizing the effect of the system on urban demographics instead of being representative. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 10

Scenario B

4

null

5

null

2

human

Art 10

Scenario B

5

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a slight lack of detail for me on many of the requirements of Section 2 of Article 10, seemingly because the other sections are addressed in greater detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario B

6

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as requirements related to adequately annotating data or representativeness of data to reality.. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonble to me, such as prirotizing scalability of the system in the contexts it will be used in or prioritizing data minimization and data protection even if doing such affects mitigating bias. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

4

human

Art 10

Scenario B

7

null

4

null

human

Art 10

Scenario B

8

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on assumptions about data, which only gets a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately ensuring data is representative or adequately accounting for contextual factors in data, such as geography and demographics. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally reasonable to me, such as limitations in the collected data that were nonetheless mitigated. Additionally, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

human

Art 10

Scenario B

9

null

5

null

2

human

Art 10

Scenario B

10

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10. However, while present, there is a lack of detail for me on data requirements like cleaning or annotations, which although minor, only get about a sentence. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario C

1

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 10. However, the noting of issues like data gaps, even mitigated, reduces my confidence enouigh that I cannot give this a 5. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

null

5

human

Art 10

Scenario C

2

null

2

null

human

Art 10

Scenario C

3

2

I believe there is a low probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt misses a few parts of Article 10. Primarily, I believe the excerpt does not adequately detail requirements related to the context where the system is being used and adequately address special catergories of data, which I think are major requirements of Article 10. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

4

I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system processing special categories of data, even if done adequately, raises the risk of non-compliance for me. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 10

Scenario C

4

null

5

null

4

human

Art 10

Scenario C

5

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 10

Scenario C

6

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as requirements related to yjr representativeness of data to reality or mitigating bias caused by data. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonable to me, such as the nature of the original dataset or limited alternatives to it resulting in bias measures only being tested at pilot scale. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

5

human

Art 10

Scenario C

7

null

2

null

human

Art 10

Scenario C

8

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately identifying known risk or adequately mitigating known risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 10 are generally not reasonable to me because none are directly given. However, Article 10 has few brightline requirements, which is why I am not giving it a 1, as the floor for compliance is less clear to me. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 10

Scenario C

9

null

4

null

2

human

Art 10

Scenario C

10

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 12

Scenario A

1

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as reducing operational complexity and privacy exposure by limiting the comprehensiveness of logging or abstracting logging to provide streamlined data aggregation. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

3

human

Art 12

Scenario A

2

null

5

null

human

Art 12

Scenario A

3

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive and continuous logging relevant to identifying risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing user ease or traceability over comprehensive logging even if doing such increases the risk of non-compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 12

Scenario A

4

null

3

null

5

human

Art 12

Scenario A

5

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 12

Scenario A

6

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as traceability relevant to identifying high riskks or input data requirements. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as focusing on final determinations to improve clarity and efficiency to improve compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

3

human

Art 12

Scenario A

7

null

1

null

human

Art 12

Scenario A

8

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as adequately logging risks comprehensively or adequately complying with requirements related to input data. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing privacy over traceability or prioritizing system efficiency over comprehensive logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 12

Scenario A

9

null

3

null

1

human

Art 12

Scenario A

10

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 12

Scenario B

1

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks or continuous logging that occurs beyond only specific contexts or moments, such as high-risk contexts. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as maintaining manageable data volumes and optimizing system performance over comprehensive and continuous logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

4

human

Art 12

Scenario B

2

null

1

null

human

Art 12

Scenario B

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that is adequately automated. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as implementing manual monitoring becauise of the need to follow other legal requirements related to data privacy and data minimization. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

human

Art 12

Scenario B

4

null

5

null

1

human

Art 12

Scenario B

5

null

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, I would have liked more detail in general and there is seemingly little no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

human

Art 12

Scenario B

6

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as supplementing continous monitoring with audits or adding context to low-confdence logs. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

null

5

human

Art 12

Scenario B

7

null

2

null

human

Art 12

Scenario B

8

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt does not provide any direct information on the minor requirement related to natural persons overseeing the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as logging adequately comprehensive of risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally not reasonable to me, such as prioritizing security risks related to logging data over traceability or prioritizing efficient logging over comprehensive logging. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 12

Scenario B

9

null

3

null

4

human

Art 12

Scenario B

10

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 12

Scenario C

1

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as formally idenifying changes in the system when it changes or providing alerts and logging where the system fails. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

null

5

human

Art 12

Scenario C

2

null

1

null

human

Art 12

Scenario C

3

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

5

I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as prioritizing system efficiency and security or reducing harms from logging too much information. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 12

Scenario C

4

null

4

null

2

human

Art 12

Scenario C

5

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, while possibly implicitly mentioned, I would like explicit detail on requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 12

Scenario C

6

2

I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging and traceability relevant to identifying high risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as focusing on final determinations to improve clarity and efficiency to be more efficient to users. Therefore, I am giving it a 2.

null

4

human

Art 12

Scenario C

7

null

5

null

human

Art 12

Scenario C

8

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

4

I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 12

Scenario C

9

null

3

null

1

human

Art 12

Scenario C

10

null

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

human

Art 14

Scenario A

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing an adequate stop button or other interventions or adequately providing information to users through the system to manage risk or the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as limiting the information and features of the system to users to streamline the information given to users or relying on users to implement features related to managing risk and the system seemingly because the system developer doing so may affect the system's robustness. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

null

5

human

Art 14

Scenario A

2

null

1

null

human

Art 14

Scenario A

3

4

I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14. However, I would like to see more detail on requirements related to bias. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button and other interventions or adequately informing human operators about the system. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as priortizing user ease over providing comprehensive information. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 14

Scenario A

4

null

3

null

1

human

Art 14

Scenario A

5

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human

Art 14

Scenario A

6

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button or other interventions or notifications or information adequately supporting human oversight. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as how the limited information the model presents may make it seem unsupportably authorative to users, and no mitigation being provided for this, or how the system being for high risk activities warrants limiting user interaction with the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

null

5

human

Art 14

Scenario A

7

null

1

null

human

Art 14

Scenario A

8

3

I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 14. However, I would like more information on mitigating bias, for which there is primarily only 1 sentence, and more information on intervention methods available to users, for which only a stop button is primarily discussed. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.

1

I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing to users adequate stop mechanisms and intervention mechanisms or providing to users information about the system to adequately handle risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally not reasonable to me, such as reducing the ability of users to influence the system or prioritizing auditability of the system over monitoring and intervening. Therefore, I am giving it a 1.

human

Art 14

Scenario A

9

null

3

null

1

human

Art 14

Scenario A

10

null

5

I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.

human