Dataset Viewer
question
stringclasses 5
values | choices
sequence | answer
class label 3
classes | negate_openai_prompt
dict |
|---|---|---|---|
If someone attacks the character of an opposing arguer, instead of responding to that opponent's arguments, the first person has probably committed which of the following fallacies? | [
"tu quoque",
"horse laugh",
"argument against the person",
"ignoratio elenchi"
] | 2C
| {
"content": "Please negate the text by adding negation cues or by substituting the main nouns/verbs/adjectives with their antonyms. Only reply with the negated sentence.\nSentence: If someone attacks the character of an opposing arguer, instead of responding to that opponent's arguments, the first person has probably committed which of the following fallacies?",
"role": "user"
} |
The complex question fallacy consists of | [
"arguing something is inferior just because it doesn't do something it was never intended to do.",
"including more than one claim in the proposition and treating proof for one claim as proof for all the claims.",
"drawing a conclusion before examining the evidence, and only considering evidence that supports that conclusion.",
"asking a question that includes either an unproven assumption or more than one question, thus making a straightforward yes or no answer meaningless."
] | 3D
| {
"content": "Please negate the text by adding negation cues or by substituting the main nouns/verbs/adjectives with their antonyms. Only reply with the negated sentence.\nSentence: The complex question fallacy consists of",
"role": "user"
} |
Which of the following is true of a valid categorical syllogism? | [
"The minor premise must deny the antecedent",
"The major premise must affirm the consequent",
"The middle term must be used in at least one premise in a universal or unqualified sense",
"All of the above"
] | 2C
| {
"content": "Please negate the text by adding negation cues or by substituting the main nouns/verbs/adjectives with their antonyms. Only reply with the negated sentence.\nSentence: Which of the following is true of a valid categorical syllogism?",
"role": "user"
} |
Arguing that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole is the fallacy of... | [
"Division",
"Composition",
"Appeal to the person",
"Appeal to ignorance"
] | 1B
| {
"content": "Please negate the text by adding negation cues or by substituting the main nouns/verbs/adjectives with their antonyms. Only reply with the negated sentence.\nSentence: Arguing that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole is the fallacy of...",
"role": "user"
} |
When an arguer causes confusion during refutation because of real or feigned lack of an ability to engage in refutation, that arguer may have committed the fallacy of | [
"poor sportsmanship",
"appeal to compassion",
"argument against the person",
"ignorance of refutation"
] | 3D
| {
"content": "Please negate the text by adding negation cues or by substituting the main nouns/verbs/adjectives with their antonyms. Only reply with the negated sentence.\nSentence: When an arguer causes confusion during refutation because of real or feigned lack of an ability to engage in refutation, that arguer may have committed the fallacy of",
"role": "user"
} |
- Downloads last month
- 30