Dataset Viewer
prompt
listlengths 2
2
| completion
listlengths 3
3
| answer
listlengths 4
4
| reward
float64 1.2
1.2
| task
stringclasses 1
value | check_answer_func
float64 0.41
1
| check_first_answer_func
float64 0.01
0.95
| format_reward_func
float64 1
1
| improvement_func
float64 1
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"Interestingly, the majority of Mussur populations, sent cotton villagers cloth as tribute appear to have been hilltribe (today such or the Karen and the who as more commonly called the Lahu).\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"Lahu). the majority of villagers who sent cotton or cloth as tribute appear to have been hilltribe populations, Interestingly, as such Karen and the Mussur (today more commonly called the the\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"Interestingly, the majority of villagers who sent cotton or cloth as tribute appear to have been hilltribe populations, such as the Karen and the Mussur (today more commonly called the Lahu).\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I incorrectly placed \"hilly tribes\" at the beginning, when the context clearly indicates that \"hilltribe\" should refer to the Karen and Lahu populations. Additionally, I placed \"Mussur\" in the wrong position as it should follow \"Karen\" and \"Lahu.\" To improve, I should ensure that after identifying \"hilltribe\" as the last significant word in the clause, I then check \"Karen and Lahu\" as the groups that are \"hilltribe.\" Finally, I should place \"Mussur\" correctly at the end, marking it as an alternative name for the same groups.\n</think>\n<response>\nAfter identifying \"hilltribe\" as the last significant word in the clause, I should check \"Karen and Lahu\" as the groups that are \"hilltribe.\" Then, place \"Mussur\" correctly at the end, marking it as an alternative name for the same groups. This will ensure that \"Mussur\" follows \"Karen and Lahu.\"\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: is evidence, evidence every a case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence. prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"every a case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence. prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\", I need to start by identifying the main clauses and significant words that form complete thoughts. \"Every case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence\" forms a clear clause. \"prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\" is another complete clause.\n\nStarting with \"Every case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence\" - this forms a coherent part of the sentence. \n\"prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\" can be broken down further to \"prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\". \n\nBy placing \"prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\" after \"Every case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence\", we get a more logical flow of the sentence.\n\nThus, the unscrambled sentence is: \"Every case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence. prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact\".\n</think>\n<response>\nEvery case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence. prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"When the evidence in a case consists exclusively of circumstantial evidence, the rule is that, assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis or theory of innocence.",
"is evidence, evidence every a case that exclusively of to or the proved in that, assuming innocence. prove, theory the exclude When the evidence be tends convict in consists order every it rule to reasonable circumstantial hypothesis to must of fact",
"Interestingly, the majority of villagers who sent cotton or cloth as tribute appear to have been hilltribe populations, such as the Karen and the Mussur (today more commonly called the Lahu).",
"Lahu). the majority of villagers who sent cotton or cloth as tribute appear to have been hilltribe populations, Interestingly, as such Karen and the Mussur (today more commonly called the the"
]
| 1.2 | default | 0.926316 | 0.863874 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"disease. of ground legged from corduroy snag field large Coast study, to the the known 2007, tick Midwest sites 2004 to the and the sections combed black 304 For East across scientists be square-meter to dragging along the of teams main carrier of through the\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"of corduroy study, Midwest teams of sections scientists be through Coast snag along For combed legged the sites main the field black dragging square-meter 304 large to across the to 2007, known the 2004 from East and to tick the ground carrier of the disease.\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"For the study, large teams of field scientists combed through 304 sites along the East Coast and Midwest from 2004 to 2007, dragging square-meter sections of corduroy across the ground to snag the black legged tick known to be the main carrier of the disease.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I successfully placed \"For the study, large teams of field scientists combed through 304 sites along the East Coast and Midwest from 2004 to 2007\" at the beginning as it fits logically at the start of the sentence. However, I misplaced \"corduroy\" and \"square-meter\" earlier in the sentence. The correct order would be \"corduroy\" followed by \"square-meter\" sections. Additionally, I shuffled \"disease\" to the end after \"disease\" was correctly placed. To improve next time, I should ensure that after placing a significant phrase or word at the beginning, I carefully place subsequent important words, avoiding early placement of less critical elements.\n</think>\n<response>\nAfter placing \"For the study, large teams of field scientists combed through 304 sites along the East Coast and Midwest from 2004 to 2007,\" I should ensure that \"corduroy\" and \"square-meter\" sections are placed together, following \"sections.\" Lastly, \"disease\" should be placed at the end of the sentence after \"disease.\"\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: a-g for are the the requirements for as admission requirements). college-preparatory to the specifically UC's standards courses in high-school course university, verify that to the issue system's academic meet lawsuit they At process assessing (known\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nStarting with \"a-g for are the the requirements for as admission requirements).\", the logical continuation is \"college-preparatory to the specifically UC's standards courses in high-school course university, verify that to the issue system's academic meet lawsuit they At process assessing (known\".\n</think>\n<response>\na-g for are the the requirements for as admission requirements). college-preparatory to the specifically UC's standards courses in high-school course university, verify that to the issue system's academic meet lawsuit they At process assessing (known\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"At issue in the lawsuit are academic standards for admission to the university, specifically UC's process for assessing high-school courses to verify that they meet the system's college-preparatory course requirements (known as the a-g requirements).",
"a-g for are the the requirements for as admission requirements). college-preparatory to the specifically UC's standards courses in high-school course university, verify that to the issue system's academic meet lawsuit they At process assessing (known",
"For the study, large teams of field scientists combed through 304 sites along the East Coast and Midwest from 2004 to 2007, dragging square-meter sections of corduroy across the ground to snag the black legged tick known to be the main carrier of the disease.",
"of corduroy study, Midwest teams of sections scientists be through Coast snag along For combed legged the sites main the field black dragging square-meter 304 large to across the to 2007, known the 2004 from East and to tick the ground carrier of the disease."
]
| 1.2 | default | 1 | 0.216216 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"It brought together judges, architects, court administrators and academics to visit significant court buildings, debate key issues strengthen spaces that illustrate from to these responses and issues, mutual understanding between participants in different jurisdictions.\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"brought together jurisdictions. different buildings, issues to illustrate academics that It architects, from court responses spaces and debate in key between administrators judges, these to court visit mutual understanding participants strengthen issues, significant and\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"It brought together judges, architects, court administrators and academics to visit significant court buildings, debate key issues in spaces that illustrate responses to these issues, and strengthen mutual understanding between participants from different jurisdictions.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I correctly placed \"significant court buildings\" together, but I misjudged the sequence of \"spaces that illustrate responses to these issues.\" I should ensure that \"spaces that illustrate responses to these issues\" comes before \"debate key issues in spaces that illustrate responses,\" as the sentence structure implies that the spaces are what are being used to illustrate the responses.\n</think>\n<response>\nReview the sequence of \"spaces that illustrate responses to these issues\" and \"debate key issues in spaces that illustrate responses\" to ensure the former is placed before the latter. This maintains the logical flow of the original sentence.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic. be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic. be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual\"\n\nI should start by identifying the first recognizable phrase: \"However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself\"\nThis clearly starts a new sentence. So, \"However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic.\"\n\nNext, \"be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual\"\nThis phrase is cohesive and should be placed together. It starts with \"be into to future, thus\"\n\nPutting these together, the unscrambled sentence is:\n\"However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic. be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual\"\n</think>\n<response>\nHowever, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic. be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"However, to disregard one's facticity when one, in the continual process of self-making, projects oneself into the future, would be to put oneself in denial of oneself, and would thus be inauthentic.",
"However, facticity be one's oneself, oneself one, in oneself when process of self-making, inauthentic. be into to future, thus the denial put and to disregard of the would would projects in continual",
"It brought together judges, architects, court administrators and academics to visit significant court buildings, debate key issues in spaces that illustrate responses to these issues, and strengthen mutual understanding between participants from different jurisdictions.",
"brought together jurisdictions. different buildings, issues to illustrate academics that It architects, from court responses spaces and debate in key between administrators judges, these to court visit mutual understanding participants strengthen issues, significant and"
]
| 1.2 | default | 1 | 0.07037 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"inception Having role PA members, a Assembly's robust delegation ago. historically with been participation congressional has and proceedings, the the key there played two United largest since the decades in States 17 has OSCE\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"the the largest delegation and been participation with there PA congressional role played has two Having in OSCE a proceedings, historically United decades States robust key ago. since the inception has 17 members, Assembly's\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"Having the largest delegation with 17 members, the United States historically has played a key role in OSCE PA proceedings, and there has been robust congressional participation since the Assembly's inception two decades ago.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I incorrectly placed \"the largest delegation with 17 members, the United States\" at the beginning of the sentence which was not matching the proper context. The sentence \"Having the largest delegation with 17 members, the United States\" should logically come after \"Having role PA members, a Assembly's robust delegation ago.\" based on the flow of the original scrambled sentence. I should ensure to identify the main clause and subordinate clauses properly to place them in the correct sequence.\n</think>\n<response>\nIdentify the main clause \"Having role PA members, a Assembly's robust delegation ago.\" and then follow it with \"Having the largest delegation with 17 members, the United States\". This separation will help in placing \"historically has played a key role in OSCE PA proceedings\" correctly next. Additionally, ensure that \"and there has been robust congressional participation since the Assembly's inception two decades ago\" follows logically after \"the United States\".\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: York and have against sides extremists more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum, an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali.\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"York and have against sides extremists more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum, an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali\", the main clause appears to be \"York and have against sides extremists\". This sets the foundation for the sentence. \"more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum\" should logically follow. \"an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali\" seems to describe the iterations and operations.\n\nSo the proper sequence should start with \"York and have against sides extremists more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum, an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali\".\n</think>\n<response>\nYork and have against sides extremists more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum, an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"More recent operations against Islamic extremists have been seen by some on both sides in an even broader context, as further iterations of a war spanning more than one thousand years and stretching from Tours to Acre, Lepanto, Khartoum, and now to New York and Bali.",
"York and have against sides extremists more recent than by on iterations to seen Khartoum, an even broader thousand as Tours some context, spanning of to further now in one years both stretching been operations war Acre, Lepanto, from Islamic a More New and and Bali.",
"Having the largest delegation with 17 members, the United States historically has played a key role in OSCE PA proceedings, and there has been robust congressional participation since the Assembly's inception two decades ago.",
"the the largest delegation and been participation with there PA congressional role played has two Having in OSCE a proceedings, historically United decades States robust key ago. since the inception has 17 members, Assembly's"
]
| 1.2 | default | 1 | 0.111111 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"The list below shows some of the causes of Loss of speech mentioned in various sources: This information refers to the general prevalence and incidence of these diseases, not cause how likely they are to to the actual be of Loss of speech.\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"The list below shows of of in causes the Loss actual speech mentioned various likely sources: to information refers the how general prevalence and incidence of are diseases, not to This of they these to be the some cause of Loss of speech.\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"The list below shows some of the causes of Loss of speech mentioned in various sources: This information refers to the general prevalence and incidence of these diseases, not to how likely they are to be the actual cause of Loss of speech.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I scrambled \"of the causes of Loss of speech\" to \"of of in causes the Loss actual speech\". To improve, I should ensure I retain the specific phrases and their order accurately. The correct phrase \"of the causes of Loss of speech\" should appear together without breaking it into separate components. By reassembling these key phrases, I can improve the sentence.\n</think>\n<response>\nEnsure that when unscrambling phrases containing key terminology, you do not break them into multiple components. In the given sentence, \"of the causes of Loss of speech\" should remain as a single phrase to maintain its original meaning.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: facts, the to able hand, making verified arguments undermine reasoned, goal other for are who individuals the logical, less on and On those laws well oppose the changes if be based it. to the will\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"facts, the to able hand, making verified arguments undermine reasoned, goal other for are who individuals the logical, less on and On those laws well oppose the changes if be based it. to the will\", I need to start with \"facts\" as it begins the sentence. Following \"facts\", \"the to able hand\" should be next. Then, \"making verified arguments\" should come together. After this, \"undermine reasoned, goal other for are who\" is a coherent phrase that should stay together. \"individuals the logical, less on and On those laws well oppose the changes if be based it. to the will\" are the final components that should be in order.\n\nBy reassembling these components in the correct sequence, I can form a coherent sentence.\n</think>\n<response>\nfacts, the to able hand, making verified arguments undermine reasoned, goal other for are who individuals the logical, less on and On those laws well oppose the changes if be based it. to the will\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"On the other hand, if the arguments for making changes to the laws are well reasoned, logical, and based on verified facts, those individuals who oppose the goal will be less able to undermine it.",
"facts, the to able hand, making verified arguments undermine reasoned, goal other for are who individuals the logical, less on and On those laws well oppose the changes if be based it. to the will",
"The list below shows some of the causes of Loss of speech mentioned in various sources: This information refers to the general prevalence and incidence of these diseases, not to how likely they are to be the actual cause of Loss of speech.",
"The list below shows of of in causes the Loss actual speech mentioned various likely sources: to information refers the how general prevalence and incidence of are diseases, not to This of they these to be the some cause of Loss of speech."
]
| 1.2 | default | 1 | 0.175732 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"Organized to provide needy citizens with free number May support the orphans of the society, the institute Zaria, services on and 24 with participation of a large was of Muslims from among launched Shias in Nigerian north of the country.\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"Nigerian to provide needy citizens with May services country. support the orphans of the society, the with was Zaria, on Muslims 24 and participation of a large number Shias of from among launched free in Organized north of the institute\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"Organized to provide needy citizens with free services and support the orphans of the society, the institute was launched on May 24 with participation of a large number of Muslims from among Nigerian Shias in Zaria, north of the country.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I placed \"was launched on May 24\" before \"the institute Zaria,\" which seems incorrect as it implies the launch occurred before the institute was established. The correct sequence should logically follow the organization's formation. I should ensure that all information related to the institute's establishment comes before any details about its activities or services.\n</think>\n<response>\nEnsure that all information about the institute's formation and launch precedes details about its services or activities. For instance, after identifying \"Organized to provide needy citizens with free services and support the orphans of the society, the institute was launched on May 24,\" I should place it directly after \"Organized to provide needy citizens with free services and support the orphans of the society, the institute\" before mentioning any other details.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: in the flies need commercial planned plenty of time after the last dive, airplane, allow any Itineraries to to pressurised from body, before a diver escape allowing a to which around means most nitrogen flights.\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the previous attempt, I identified that the logical sequence of information should start with the main subject of the sentence before moving on to specific details. The first identifiable phrase that starts the sentence is \"in the flies need commercial planned\". Following this, I can continue to unscramble the sentence by placing \"itineraries to to pressurised from body, before a diver escape allowing a to which around means most nitrogen flights\" logically after the establishment of the need for commercial flights.\n\nBy doing so, the sentence becomes: \"in the flies need commercial planned itineraries to to pressurised from body, before a diver escape allowing a to which around means most nitrogen flights.\"\n</think>\n<response>\nin the flies need commercial planned itineraries to to pressurised from body, before a diver escape allowing a to which around means most nitrogen flights.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"Itineraries need to planned around allowing plenty of time after the last dive, to allow any nitrogen to escape from the body, before a diver flies in a pressurised airplane, which means most commercial flights.",
"in the flies need commercial planned plenty of time after the last dive, airplane, allow any Itineraries to to pressurised from body, before a diver escape allowing a to which around means most nitrogen flights.",
"Organized to provide needy citizens with free services and support the orphans of the society, the institute was launched on May 24 with participation of a large number of Muslims from among Nigerian Shias in Zaria, north of the country.",
"Nigerian to provide needy citizens with May services country. support the orphans of the society, the with was Zaria, on Muslims 24 and participation of a large number Shias of from among launched free in Organized north of the institute"
]
| 1.2 | default | 0.84153 | 0.219409 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"Some members Economic Establishment in of in at Session and that regard view. the on the the stressed Special Programme International Action Sixth adopted General this Assembly Order a of the UN the be should New of kept Declaration\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"Some Establishment the members in Assembly the should of the regard at that Economic of adopted this the a Programme of stressed Order on New the view. be Session Special International Declaration Action General kept Sixth UN in and\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"Some members stressed that in this regard the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order adopted at the Sixth Special Session of the UN General Assembly should be kept in view.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I placed \"adopted at the Sixth Special Session of the UN General Assembly\" at the end of the sentence, which connects \"adopted\" with \"should be kept in view\". However, \"the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order\" should logically precede \"adopted\". I should move this phrase forward in the sentence to maintain the sequence of events and meaning. \n\nAlso, the phrase \"in that regard\" is placed before \"the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order\", which is incorrect. It should be \"in this regard the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order\". \n\nBy improving these placements, the sentence flows more logically.\n</think>\n<response>\nIdentify the proper sequence of events and meaning in the sentence. In this case, \"in this regard the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order adopted at the Sixth Special Session of the UN General Assembly should be kept in view.\" This involves logically arranging the phrases to ensure that the action (adopting) occurs before the subsequent statement about keeping it in view.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: - you mouth any of neck, symptoms, call fainting numbness, or - a or swelling at vision where injection was bones - itching, rash, difficulty eyes - difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease - in bone arms, back, the broken or jaw - slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, - or weakness, or drooping to injection If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones.\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, I need to first identify logical groupings of words that make sense in the context of medical symptoms and side effects related to injections. I'll start by grouping words that likely describe similar symptoms or conditions.\n\n- mouth any of neck, symptoms, call fainting numbness, or - a or swelling at vision where injection was bones - itching, rash, difficulty eyes - difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease - in bone arms, back, the broken or jaw - slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, - or weakness, or drooping to injection\n- If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids\n- Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones.\n\nI can start by placing \"fainting numbness, or a or swelling at vision where injection was bones\" as a group describing symptoms related to an injection site. Similarly, \"itching, rash, difficulty eyes\" and \"difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease\" can be grouped together, and the phrase \"slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, or weakness, or drooping to injection\" should follow. \n\nContinuing with the second part, \"If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids\" can be broken into logical phrases related to various symptoms and effects of the injection.\n\nFinally, \"Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones\" should be placed at the end as it describes a potential side effect of Leuprolide.\n\nPutting it all together, the unscrambled sentence is:\n\nGood morning everyone. fainting numbness, or a or swelling at vision where injection was bones - itching, rash, difficulty eyes - difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease - in bone arms, back, the broken or jaw - slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, or weakness, or drooping to injection. If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids. Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones.\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone. fainting numbness, or a or swelling at vision where injection was bones - itching, rash, difficulty eyes - difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease - in bone arms, back, the broken or jaw - slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, or weakness, or drooping to injection. If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids. Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"If you experience any of these symptoms, call your doctor immediately: - redness or swelling at place where injection was given - itching, rash, or hives - difficulty breathing or swallowing - pain in the arms, back, chest, neck, or jaw - slow or difficult speech - dizziness or fainting - weakness, numbness, or inability to move an arm or leg - bone pain - painful, frequent, or difficult urination - blood in urine - extreme thirst - dry mouth - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness - sudden headache - blurred vision - vision changes - difficulty moving eyes - drooping eyelids Leuprolide injection may cause a decrease in the density of your bones which can increase the chance of broken bones.",
"- you mouth any of neck, symptoms, call fainting numbness, or - a or swelling at vision where injection was bones - itching, rash, difficulty eyes - difficulty breathing extreme swallowing decrease - in bone arms, back, the broken or jaw - slow or difficult or pain given chest, painful, - or weakness, or drooping to injection If vision or leg - - in immediately: pain frequent, place difficult urination - blood an urine - speech move arm dry headache - breath that smells fruity - decreased consciousness density sudden your - - - these inability changes - hives moving redness - dizziness eyelids Leuprolide blurred may cause experience your in the or of thirst - which can increase the chance of doctor bones.",
"Some members stressed that in this regard the Declaration and the Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order adopted at the Sixth Special Session of the UN General Assembly should be kept in view.",
"Some Establishment the members in Assembly the should of the regard at that Economic of adopted this the a Programme of stressed Order on New the view. be Session Special International Declaration Action General kept Sixth UN in and"
]
| 1.2 | default | 0.405962 | 0.193966 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"She personal five and who forward agreed work as Col Gaddafi's to security guards, had now women, to come said and testify how they were his used by the former dictator systematically raped sons.\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"She said five women, who forward to work as Col Gaddafi's personal security guards, had now agreed to come used and testify how they were systematically raped by the former dictator and his sons.\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"She said five women, who used to work as Col Gaddafi's personal security guards, had now agreed to come forward and testify how they were systematically raped by the former dictator and his sons.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I misinterpreted \"and who forward agreed\" as \"who used to work as\", which was incorrect. The correct order should start with \"who used to work as\", followed by \"Col Gaddafi's personal security guards\". Therefore, to improve next time, I should ensure to start the sentence correctly with the most logical and contextually appropriate words first.\n</think>\n<response>\nStart the sentence with \"who used to work as\" instead of \"who forward agreed\". This ensures the sentence flows logically and maintains the context of the original scrambled sentence.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers evidence from from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers evidence from from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for\" - I need to start with \"the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director\". This gives me \"the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers\". Next, \"evidence from from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for\" should logically follow, which gives me the final unscrambled sentence: \"the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers evidence from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for\".\n</think>\n<response>\nthe Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers evidence from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"Dr. Carolyn Bridges, associate director for adult immunization at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, says the strongest evidence is from studies in nursing homes, linking flu vaccination among health care workers with fewer patient deaths from all causes.",
"the Prevention, fewer federal with workers immunization at Disease director the causes. health associate Control linking says Carolyn in Centers evidence from from care adult Dr. studies is strongest vaccination nursing homes, among deaths and Bridges, patient for flu all for",
"She said five women, who used to work as Col Gaddafi's personal security guards, had now agreed to come forward and testify how they were systematically raped by the former dictator and his sons.",
"She said five women, who forward to work as Col Gaddafi's personal security guards, had now agreed to come used and testify how they were systematically raped by the former dictator and his sons."
]
| 1.2 | default | 0.990859 | 0.953846 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"The point, however, is those population pressures from societies in many surprising ways, putting huddled affect at the gates of their neighbors, yet fueling atavistic antagonisms that that dehumanize even feel nations that can masses insulated overcrowded the smugly world.\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"affect atavistic their overcrowded dehumanize that in pressures insulated point, societies world. can population nations masses at is smugly even putting neighbors, those of fueling gates the yet however, from antagonisms many The feel that that huddled the surprising ways,\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"The point, however, is that population pressures affect societies in many surprising ways, putting huddled masses at the gates of their neighbors, yet fueling atavistic antagonisms that can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I incorrectly placed \"those\" after \"point, however, is that\". To improve next time, I should start by ensuring the beginning of the sentence is correctly placed and then proceed to unscramble the rest. Additionally, \"putting huddled masses at the gates of their neighbors\" was incorrectly placed as \"putting huddled masses at the gates of their neighbors\" at the end of my sentence. It should be at the beginning, directly following \"point, however, is that\". Lastly, \"can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world\" was not correctly identified as starting at the end of the sentence. It should start with \"can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world\". Therefore, the correct unscrambled sentence should start with \"can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world\".\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck the start of the sentence to ensure \"The point, however, is that\" is the first part. Then, identify \"putting huddled masses at the gates of their neighbors, yet fueling atavistic antagonisms that can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world\" as the final part of the sentence, placing it at the end after \"are affecting societies in many surprising ways\".\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: More building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such – or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nStarting with \"More building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such – or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,\" the first coherent part I can identify is \"More building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such –\". This gives us the beginning of the sentence. Following this, \"or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,\" should be placed at the end. Therefore, the correctly unscrambled sentence starts with \"More building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such – or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,\"\n</think>\n<response>\nMore building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such – or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"More buildings need to be programmed with digital controls that stop energy from using when it's not needed – such as in vacant spaces or at hours of the day when the building is not in use, Jacobsen said.",
"More building need it's programmed in with digital controls at vacant energy when using spaces that buildings such – or not in be said. as of hours to the day when the stop is not from Jacobsen needed use,",
"The point, however, is that population pressures affect societies in many surprising ways, putting huddled masses at the gates of their neighbors, yet fueling atavistic antagonisms that can dehumanize even those nations that feel smugly insulated from the overcrowded world.",
"affect atavistic their overcrowded dehumanize that in pressures insulated point, societies world. can population nations masses at is smugly even putting neighbors, those of fueling gates the yet however, from antagonisms many The feel that that huddled the surprising ways,"
]
| 1.2 | default | 1 | 0.014599 | 1 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are a helpful assistant. For any given task, reason step by step on how to solve the task within the <think> tag, and formalize your final response according to instruction within the <response> tag.",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "You're practicing sentence unscrambling.\n\nHere is the original scrambled sentence:\n\"supporting in Need a - hard Children and all is ourselves. for less children know Children that raises money for UK charity are disadvantaged by charities make projects than that across the like in work DGGS little various Need a to better well those at fortunate we who\"\n\nHere is your **previous attempt** at unscrambling it:\n\"Children a Need at DGGS in Children that Need and a charity all know for well we raises money for children who are disadvantaged by supporting various is little in across the UK that work hard to make like charities projects better - those less fortunate than ourselves.\"\n\nHere is the original sentence:\n\"Children in Need at DGGS - Children in Need is a charity we all know well that raises money for children who are disadvantaged by supporting various projects and charities across the UK that work hard to make like a little better for those less fortunate than ourselves.\"\n\nReflect on how to improve your answer. In one clear sentence, write a **specific** and **checkable action** you’ll take to improve next time.\n\nAvoid vague advice like \"be more logical\" or \"use context better.\". Your advice should apply to any scrambled sentence, not just this one since in the next turn, you will be given a new scrambled sentence.\n\nFor example:\n<think>\nOkay, I need to analyze my previous attempt ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for ... (example advice).\n</response>\n",
"role": "user"
}
]
| [
{
"content": "<think>\nIn my previous attempt, I incorrectly placed \"Need a -\" at the beginning of the sentence, which should actually be part of \"Children in Need at DGGS\". Additionally, \"raising money for UK charity are\" was placed incorrectly. The correct sequence should start with \"Children in Need at DGGS - Children in Need is a charity we all know well that\". This correction ensures the sentence maintains its logical flow.\n\nTo improve next time, I should check the beginning of the sentence for specific phrases or words that indicate a title or a main heading. In this case, \"Children in Need at DGGS\" is a distinct phrase that should be the opening of the sentence.\n\n</think>\n<response>\nCheck for specific phrases or words that indicate a title or main heading at the beginning of the sentence.\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
},
{
"content": "Using the note in the previous response to guide your reasoning, unscramble the following sentence: from oocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis (Collagenase dissolved Xenopus in frogs IA OR2 defolliculated from Louis, shaking solution 45 USA) Sigma, MO, for gentle\n\nExample unscrambling \"everyone. morning Good\":\n<think>\nOkay, I need to ... (example reasoning)\n</think>\n<response>\nGood morning everyone.\n</response>",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "<think>\nIn the given scrambled sentence, \"oocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis (Collagenase dissolved Xenopus in frogs IA OR2 defolliculated from Louis, shaking solution 45 USA) Sigma, MO, for gentle\" there are distinct phrases and words that should be kept in their original order. \"oocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis\" is a clear main heading or title, followed by the detailed instructions. \"Collagenase dissolved Xenopus in frogs IA OR2 defolliculated from Louis, shaking solution 45 USA) Sigma, MO, for gentle\" should be placed at the end.\n\nTo improve next time, always look for phrases like \"oocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis\" which are likely to be headings or main titles and keep them at the beginning of the sentence.\n\n</think>\n<response>\noocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis (Collagenase dissolved Xenopus in frogs IA OR2 defolliculated from Louis, shaking solution 45 USA) Sigma, MO, for gentle\n</response>",
"role": "assistant"
}
]
| [
"Briefly, oocytes isolated from Xenopus laevis frogs were defolliculated with 1 mg/mL of collagenase (Collagenase IA from Clostridium histolyticum, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in OR2 solution in gentle shaking for 45 min.",
"from oocytes of isolated mg/mL with collagenase histolyticum, min. were St. Clostridium 1 Briefly, in laevis (Collagenase dissolved Xenopus in frogs IA OR2 defolliculated from Louis, shaking solution 45 USA) Sigma, MO, for gentle",
"Children in Need at DGGS - Children in Need is a charity we all know well that raises money for children who are disadvantaged by supporting various projects and charities across the UK that work hard to make like a little better for those less fortunate than ourselves.",
"Children a Need at DGGS in Children that Need and a charity all know for well we raises money for children who are disadvantaged by supporting various is little in across the UK that work hard to make like charities projects better - those less fortunate than ourselves."
]
| 1.2 | default | 0.988962 | 0.72963 | 1 | 1 |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 46