Datasets:
Tasks:
Image Classification
Modalities:
Image
Formats:
parquet
Sub-tasks:
multi-class-image-classification
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
image-classification
food
cuisine-classification
binary-classification
computer-vision
augmented-dataset
License:
Dataset Viewer
Search is not available for this dataset
image
image | label
int32 |
---|---|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Asian vs Western Food Classification Dataset
Dataset Summary
Purpose: This dataset was created for binary classification of food images into Asian or Western cuisine categories, developed as part of CMU 24-679 coursework to explore computer vision techniques in food recognition.
Quick Stats:
- 360 total images (40 original + 320 augmented)
- Binary classification task
- 224x224 RGB images
- Balanced classes (~50% each category)
Contact: [email protected]
Sample Contact Sheet
Sample grid showing 4 Asian cuisine images (top row) and 4 Western cuisine images (bottom row) from the original dataset
Dataset Composition
Features
image
: PIL Image object (224x224 RGB)label
: Integer (0=Western, 1=Asian)
Class Distribution
Cuisine Type | Original | Augmented | Label |
---|---|---|---|
Western | 20 | 160 | 0 |
Asian | 20 | 160 | 1 |
Data Splits
- original: 40 hand-collected food images
- augmented: 320 synthetically augmented images (8x augmentation per original)
Data Collection Process
Collection Methodology
Images were collected between January-February 2025 using:
- Personal photography of restaurant meals
- Home-cooked dishes from both culinary traditions
- Mobile phone cameras (various models)
- Natural lighting conditions when possible
Selection Criteria
- Clear food presentation
- Distinctive cuisine characteristics
- No people or identifying information in frame
- Variety in dish types (appetizers, mains, desserts)
- Representative of common dishes from each cuisine
Preprocessing and Augmentation
Preprocessing Pipeline
- Resize to 224x224 pixels (bilinear interpolation)
- Convert to RGB format
- Normalize pixel values to [0, 255]
Augmentation Techniques
Each original image generated 7 augmented variants using:
- Geometric: RandomResizedCrop (0.7-1.0), RandomRotation (±15°), RandomHorizontalFlip (p=0.5)
- Color: ColorJitter (brightness=0.2, contrast=0.2, saturation=0.15, hue=0.05)
- Advanced: RandAugment (num_ops=2, magnitude=7), RandomErasing (p=0.2)
Labels and Annotation
Labeling Schema
- 0: Western cuisine (European, American dishes)
- 1: Asian cuisine (East Asian, Southeast Asian dishes)
Annotation Process
- Manual labeling by dataset creator
- Verification based on known cuisine origins
- Edge cases resolved by primary ingredients and cooking methods
Intended Use and Limitations
Intended Use Cases
- Educational projects in computer vision
- Binary food classification research
- Transfer learning experiments
- Baseline model development
Limitations
- Small dataset size requires transfer learning for good performance
- Binary classification oversimplifies cuisine diversity
- May not generalize to fusion cuisine or ambiguous dishes
- Limited to common dishes, not comprehensive of all cuisine varieties
- Potential bias toward restaurant-style presentation
Out-of-Scope Uses
- Commercial food recognition systems
- Medical or dietary assessment applications
- Fine-grained cuisine classification (regional variations)
- Production deployment without additional training data
Ethical Considerations
Representation
- Effort made to balance representation between cuisine types
- Acknowledges that binary classification may perpetuate oversimplified cultural categories
- "Asian" and "Western" are broad categorizations that don't capture cuisine diversity
Privacy
- No personally identifiable information included
- No restaurant branding or identifying markers
- Images taken in public settings or personal kitchens
Cultural Sensitivity
- Dataset created for educational purposes
- Users should be aware of cultural simplification in binary categorization
- Not intended to make value judgments about cuisine types
AI Usage Disclosure
AI-Assisted Components
- Augmentation code: Partially generated using AI assistance for transform pipeline
- Documentation: README structure and sections refined with AI assistance
- Data collection: All images are original, not AI-generated
- Labels: Manually assigned, not AI-generated
Human Oversight
- All images personally collected and verified
- Labels manually reviewed for accuracy
- Augmentation parameters tuned based on empirical testing
- Final dataset curated and quality-checked by human creator
Usage Example
from datasets import load_dataset
from torchvision import transforms
# Load dataset
dataset = load_dataset("maryzhang/hw1-24679-image-dataset")
# Setup transforms
transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
])
# Access data
sample = dataset['original'][0]
image, label = sample['image'], sample['label']
cuisine = "Asian" if label == 1 else "Western"
print(f"Sample cuisine type: {cuisine}")
Citation
@dataset{zhang2025food,
author = {Mary Zhang},
title = {Asian vs Western Food Classification Dataset},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Hugging Face},
note = {CMU 24-679 Homework 1},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/maryzhang/hw1-24679-image-dataset}
}
License
This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Contact
Dataset created by Mary Zhang for CMU 24-679. For questions or issues, please use the discussion forum on Hugging Face.
- Downloads last month
- 52