Dataset Viewer
input
stringlengths 32
1.92k
| task
stringclasses 1
value | response
int64 0
2
| idx
int64 0
393k
| generated_prompt
stringlengths 839
2.73k
| score
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
premise: Although they needed to avoid water snakes, alligators, and disease-carrying mosquitoes, they enjoyed a cornucopia of seafood and game, flavoring it with a hot sauce the Creoles would later adopt.
hypothesis: They enjoyed a cornucopia of seafood and game. | mnli | 0 | 218,865 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Although they needed to avoid water snakes, alligators, and disease-carrying mosquitoes, they enjoyed a cornucopia of seafood and game, flavoring it with a hot sauce the Creoles would later adopt.
hypothesis: They enjoyed a cornucopia of seafood and game.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: They play a shell Take this part of the Social Security tax and convert it into a mandatory savings contribution; take today's benefit and divide it into two parts; give everybody this new account and that minimum guarantee; take this shell and put it there and bring that shell over here, and--hey presto!
hypothesis: They play a shell game. | mnli | 0 | 212,196 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: They play a shell Take this part of the Social Security tax and convert it into a mandatory savings contribution; take today's benefit and divide it into two parts; give everybody this new account and that minimum guarantee; take this shell and put it there and bring that shell over here, and--hey presto!
hypothesis: They play a shell game.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Given the extensiveness of the proposed revisions, we plan to issue a new version of GAGAS that will incorporate existing amendments.
hypothesis: We will issue a new set of guidelines that includes all amendments and revisions. | mnli | 1 | 59,495 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Given the extensiveness of the proposed revisions, we plan to issue a new version of GAGAS that will incorporate existing amendments.
hypothesis: We will issue a new set of guidelines that includes all amendments and revisions.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: It continues through the turbulent eras of Scottish history for both church and state, and on to the industrial developments of modern times.
hypothesis: Church and state got along harmoniously. | mnli | 1 | 235,331 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It continues through the turbulent eras of Scottish history for both church and state, and on to the industrial developments of modern times.
hypothesis: Church and state got along harmoniously.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: At various points in the film, Harrer thinks longingly of Rolf and writes him letters.
hypothesis: Harrer frequently misses Rolf and writes him letters, in the film- everybody loved that. | mnli | 2 | 329,358 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: At various points in the film, Harrer thinks longingly of Rolf and writes him letters.
hypothesis: Harrer frequently misses Rolf and writes him letters, in the film- everybody loved that.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Hates you? I cried, astonished.
hypothesis: I don't think he could hate you. | mnli | 1 | 58,255 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Hates you? I cried, astonished.
hypothesis: I don't think he could hate you.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Intent on expanding his empire into Persian-held territory, he consulted the oracle at Delphi.
hypothesis: He wanted to expand his empire into Roman-held territory, so he asked for advice. | mnli | 1 | 42,772 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Intent on expanding his empire into Persian-held territory, he consulted the oracle at Delphi.
hypothesis: He wanted to expand his empire into Roman-held territory, so he asked for advice.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Difference feminists reject the big time as a crude, ugly, and destructive male pursuit.
hypothesis: Feminists see the big time as a step backward in equal rights between sexes. | mnli | 1 | 88,131 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Difference feminists reject the big time as a crude, ugly, and destructive male pursuit.
hypothesis: Feminists see the big time as a step backward in equal rights between sexes.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Stop him?
hypothesis: Halt him before you come? | mnli | 2 | 239,564 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Stop him?
hypothesis: Halt him before you come?
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: so it's all about you say it is all voluntary do they
hypothesis: Everything is about you. | mnli | 0 | 263,064 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: so it's all about you say it is all voluntary do they
hypothesis: Everything is about you.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: It was bad enough before, when we thought he'd done it, but I'm hanged if it isn't worse now, when we all feel guilty for having been so down on the fellow.
hypothesis: We were woefully incorrect in our assumption of his guilt. | mnli | 0 | 200,559 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: It was bad enough before, when we thought he'd done it, but I'm hanged if it isn't worse now, when we all feel guilty for having been so down on the fellow.
hypothesis: We were woefully incorrect in our assumption of his guilt.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: uh-huh yeah that's true yeah and with age comes you know the the i'm sure arthritis sets in with them you know right yeah
hypothesis: I have no worries about arthritis. | mnli | 1 | 32,019 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: uh-huh yeah that's true yeah and with age comes you know the the i'm sure arthritis sets in with them you know right yeah
hypothesis: I have no worries about arthritis.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: All I have to do is let this train reach its third stop.'
hypothesis: The train has to go to the seventh stop. | mnli | 1 | 63,878 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: All I have to do is let this train reach its third stop.'
hypothesis: The train has to go to the seventh stop.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: right yeah well that's that's a big that's really important because i do have a college fund set aside for my kids
hypothesis: I've yet to setup a dedicated college fund for my children. | mnli | 2 | 280,526 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: right yeah well that's that's a big that's really important because i do have a college fund set aside for my kids
hypothesis: I've yet to setup a dedicated college fund for my children.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Other Craftwork
hypothesis: Artwork less common than most. | mnli | 1 | 277,065 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Other Craftwork
hypothesis: Artwork less common than most.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: With respect to section 604(a)(2), the analysis issued with the final rule states that HCFA received no comments on the methodology used in its initial analysis.
hypothesis: The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments. | mnli | 0 | 287,121 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: With respect to section 604(a)(2), the analysis issued with the final rule states that HCFA received no comments on the methodology used in its initial analysis.
hypothesis: The analysis issued with the final rule says the HCFA didn't get any comments.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Therefore we use postal density as the driver of fixed costs.
hypothesis: Fixed costs are determined by vote. | mnli | 0 | 180,624 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Therefore we use postal density as the driver of fixed costs.
hypothesis: Fixed costs are determined by vote.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The advertisement page of a magazine fell out.
hypothesis: A page of a magazine fell out. | mnli | 1 | 261,090 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The advertisement page of a magazine fell out.
hypothesis: A page of a magazine fell out.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The dust lay thick upon it, and festoons of cobwebs lay between it and the wall.
hypothesis: It hadn't been touched in years so it was covered in dust. | mnli | 1 | 323,225 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The dust lay thick upon it, and festoons of cobwebs lay between it and the wall.
hypothesis: It hadn't been touched in years so it was covered in dust.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I wish I had done as you do to protect it.
hypothesis: You didn't protect them at all! | mnli | 2 | 243,464 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I wish I had done as you do to protect it.
hypothesis: You didn't protect them at all!
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The organizations we studied had recognized that monitoring control effectiveness and compliance with policies is a key step in the cycle of managing information security.
hypothesis: The groups we looked at realized monitoring control effectiveness was important. | mnli | 2 | 29,964 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The organizations we studied had recognized that monitoring control effectiveness and compliance with policies is a key step in the cycle of managing information security.
hypothesis: The groups we looked at realized monitoring control effectiveness was important.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: i think that's that's that's not very likely
hypothesis: I hold the belief that that is very probable | mnli | 0 | 234,832 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i think that's that's that's not very likely
hypothesis: I hold the belief that that is very probable
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: my roommate really believes in American Express he's got the green card or the gold card and the the Optima card and
hypothesis: My roommate has been a dedicated user of their cards for years. | mnli | 1 | 339,679 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: my roommate really believes in American Express he's got the green card or the gold card and the the Optima card and
hypothesis: My roommate has been a dedicated user of their cards for years.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The researchers found that turning to someone for even modest help (like minding a child for an hour) had the cost of later demands for a return of the favor and that this cost was nearly intolerable.
hypothesis: The researchers found asking for help brought demands in the future, which the women regretted. | mnli | 1 | 82,703 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The researchers found that turning to someone for even modest help (like minding a child for an hour) had the cost of later demands for a return of the favor and that this cost was nearly intolerable.
hypothesis: The researchers found asking for help brought demands in the future, which the women regretted.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Underlying GAGAS audits is that federal, state, and local governments and other organizations cooperate in auditing programs of common interest so that the auditors may use others' work and avoid duplicate audit efforts.
hypothesis: The audits have an underlying theme that allows authors to use other's work and promote collaboration and a healthy work environment. | mnli | 1 | 172,677 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Underlying GAGAS audits is that federal, state, and local governments and other organizations cooperate in auditing programs of common interest so that the auditors may use others' work and avoid duplicate audit efforts.
hypothesis: The audits have an underlying theme that allows authors to use other's work and promote collaboration and a healthy work environment.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Now that would be scary.
hypothesis: That would be lovely. | mnli | 2 | 253,640 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Now that would be scary.
hypothesis: That would be lovely.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: What would she be likely to do with it afterwards?
hypothesis: What would she do with it before? | mnli | 2 | 37,026 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: What would she be likely to do with it afterwards?
hypothesis: What would she do with it before?
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Other participants in the Symposium and its numerous standing committees include legal services advocates and program board members, representatives of the state Attorney General's office and other government attorneys, faculty from the West Virginia College of Law, bar leaders, and representatives of the domestic violence and human services communities.
hypothesis: Domestic violence and spousal abuse was addressed at the symposium. | mnli | 2 | 92,374 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Other participants in the Symposium and its numerous standing committees include legal services advocates and program board members, representatives of the state Attorney General's office and other government attorneys, faculty from the West Virginia College of Law, bar leaders, and representatives of the domestic violence and human services communities.
hypothesis: Domestic violence and spousal abuse was addressed at the symposium.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The words in the Constitution, high crimes and misdemeanors, give us much latitude.
hypothesis: There is a level of latitude given by certain words in the Constitution. | mnli | 2 | 197,033 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The words in the Constitution, high crimes and misdemeanors, give us much latitude.
hypothesis: There is a level of latitude given by certain words in the Constitution.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: i lift weights quite a bit
hypothesis: I do some weight-lifting. | mnli | 2 | 53,476 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i lift weights quite a bit
hypothesis: I do some weight-lifting.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: All four victims are expected to survive.
hypothesis: There were zero survivors. | mnli | 0 | 199,932 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: All four victims are expected to survive.
hypothesis: There were zero survivors.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: In other words, it amounts to a bribe.
hypothesis: Basically what it is is corruption. | mnli | 1 | 234,430 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: In other words, it amounts to a bribe.
hypothesis: Basically what it is is corruption.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: i've i've never seen a Gene Autry movie hm
hypothesis: My parents are real fans of Gene Autry's work. | mnli | 2 | 70,225 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i've i've never seen a Gene Autry movie hm
hypothesis: My parents are real fans of Gene Autry's work.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: What's this?" He stepped forward, and put his arm round Jane as she swayed uncertainly.
hypothesis: Putting his arm round Jane, he stepped forward. | mnli | 2 | 275,509 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: What's this?" He stepped forward, and put his arm round Jane as she swayed uncertainly.
hypothesis: Putting his arm round Jane, he stepped forward.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: But you won't find it so easy to knock this country and its great corporations with the sort of left-wing philosophy best expressed on a bumper sticker when you don't even have a bumper!
hypothesis: The country is going down the drain. | mnli | 2 | 250,025 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But you won't find it so easy to knock this country and its great corporations with the sort of left-wing philosophy best expressed on a bumper sticker when you don't even have a bumper!
hypothesis: The country is going down the drain.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Penguin, which holds the U.S. copyright on the original Pooh books, has published black-and-white Pooh books, color Pooh books, miniature Pooh storybooks, Pooh in Latin ( Winnie ille Pu ), Pooh for New Agers ( The Tao of Pooh and its companion volume, The Te of Piglet ), and even Pooh for managers.
hypothesis: Penguin has published a lot of Pooh storybooks. | mnli | 0 | 161,559 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Penguin, which holds the U.S. copyright on the original Pooh books, has published black-and-white Pooh books, color Pooh books, miniature Pooh storybooks, Pooh in Latin ( Winnie ille Pu ), Pooh for New Agers ( The Tao of Pooh and its companion volume, The Te of Piglet ), and even Pooh for managers.
hypothesis: Penguin has published a lot of Pooh storybooks.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Instead I hugged the surface and clawed my way along, using my whole body for propulsion.
hypothesis: I fell off the surface to my death. | mnli | 1 | 353,559 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Instead I hugged the surface and clawed my way along, using my whole body for propulsion.
hypothesis: I fell off the surface to my death.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: that would be the Greek ones
hypothesis: That would be the Roman ones. | mnli | 1 | 188,095 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: that would be the Greek ones
hypothesis: That would be the Roman ones.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: That's what this center is going to provide.
hypothesis: This center will not provide anything. | mnli | 1 | 288,295 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: That's what this center is going to provide.
hypothesis: This center will not provide anything.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Their bravery might--or might not--be genetically determined.
hypothesis: Research into this area is ongoing. | mnli | 1 | 6,423 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Their bravery might--or might not--be genetically determined.
hypothesis: Research into this area is ongoing.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Employees in high-performing organizations understand the importance of and the connection between their performance and the organization's
hypothesis: Employees in high-performing organizations don't care about how their work is connected to the organization's. | mnli | 2 | 178,008 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Employees in high-performing organizations understand the importance of and the connection between their performance and the organization's
hypothesis: Employees in high-performing organizations don't care about how their work is connected to the organization's.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: yeah after well when it starts steaming a lot uh i definitely yeah put it in the refrigerator
hypothesis: When it starts steaming I put it in the refrigerator | mnli | 1 | 6,406 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah after well when it starts steaming a lot uh i definitely yeah put it in the refrigerator
hypothesis: When it starts steaming I put it in the refrigerator
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Agencies engaged in major transformation efforts, like the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) could also benefit from such an approach.
hypothesis: The FBI is a useless agency and a major transformation would be pointless, we must eliminate the agency completely for funding purposes. | mnli | 2 | 50,843 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Agencies engaged in major transformation efforts, like the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) could also benefit from such an approach.
hypothesis: The FBI is a useless agency and a major transformation would be pointless, we must eliminate the agency completely for funding purposes.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: They seem to be designed more to confuse rather than inform the reader.
hypothesis: It's meant to educate but not confuse the student. | mnli | 1 | 301,533 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: They seem to be designed more to confuse rather than inform the reader.
hypothesis: It's meant to educate but not confuse the student.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: the roster of performers reads like a who's who of political correctness.
hypothesis: The performers are known to be politically correct. | mnli | 2 | 324,641 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: the roster of performers reads like a who's who of political correctness.
hypothesis: The performers are known to be politically correct.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Tommy heard Conrad say: "Lock it and give me the key." The footsteps died away.
hypothesis: Tommy was unable to make out what Conrad was saying. | mnli | 2 | 313,362 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Tommy heard Conrad say: "Lock it and give me the key." The footsteps died away.
hypothesis: Tommy was unable to make out what Conrad was saying.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: well we were going to probably just going to start well because we're going to be moving we're talking about just putting throwing tomatoes in
hypothesis: This person does not want to start without thorough planning. | mnli | 2 | 214,091 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: well we were going to probably just going to start well because we're going to be moving we're talking about just putting throwing tomatoes in
hypothesis: This person does not want to start without thorough planning.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But that one, he is like the Apache; he is not to be caught."
hypothesis: Like the Apache, he won't be caught. | mnli | 2 | 16,653 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But that one, he is like the Apache; he is not to be caught."
hypothesis: Like the Apache, he won't be caught.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Despite this (or perhaps because of it) the economy recovered and the middle classes strengthened.
hypothesis: The middle classes strengthened because they benefited most from a growing economy. | mnli | 2 | 34,240 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Despite this (or perhaps because of it) the economy recovered and the middle classes strengthened.
hypothesis: The middle classes strengthened because they benefited most from a growing economy.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: whatever which we do pretty often and and uh fact in a lot of motels we noticed from our most recent trip they that you do not even get the telephone turned on in your room unless you've left a credit card at the desk
hypothesis: Motels have been cutting their telephone service due to the proliferation of cellular phones. | mnli | 0 | 29,114 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: whatever which we do pretty often and and uh fact in a lot of motels we noticed from our most recent trip they that you do not even get the telephone turned on in your room unless you've left a credit card at the desk
hypothesis: Motels have been cutting their telephone service due to the proliferation of cellular phones.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: As the train at length drew slowly into Charing Cross, Jane Finn sat up with a start.
hypothesis: As the train halted at Charing Cross, Jane came to life. | mnli | 0 | 272,547 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: As the train at length drew slowly into Charing Cross, Jane Finn sat up with a start.
hypothesis: As the train halted at Charing Cross, Jane came to life.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Once the finest colonial city in the Americas, Havana's grandeur has not been destroyed even by decades of crisis and neglect.
hypothesis: Havana's grandeur has remained despite decades of crisis and neglect. | mnli | 0 | 60,730 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Once the finest colonial city in the Americas, Havana's grandeur has not been destroyed even by decades of crisis and neglect.
hypothesis: Havana's grandeur has remained despite decades of crisis and neglect.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Department of Agriculture classified this rule as a major rule pursuant to section 304 of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 since it had an annual economic impact on the economy of at least $100 million and it also affected human health and safety or the environment.
hypothesis: The department of agriculture employs many different people from many different communities. | mnli | 1 | 50,615 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Department of Agriculture classified this rule as a major rule pursuant to section 304 of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 since it had an annual economic impact on the economy of at least $100 million and it also affected human health and safety or the environment.
hypothesis: The department of agriculture employs many different people from many different communities.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Audit documentation that supports significant findings, conclusions, and recommendations should be complete before auditors issue their report.
hypothesis: Audit documentation that supports the information should be mostly finished before the report is issued. | mnli | 1 | 357,897 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Audit documentation that supports significant findings, conclusions, and recommendations should be complete before auditors issue their report.
hypothesis: Audit documentation that supports the information should be mostly finished before the report is issued.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Rugby and football (soccer) are played at the Lansdowne Road venue in Ballsbridge, and traditional Irish game of hurling at Croke Park.
hypothesis: You can drop by whenever to watch a game of rugby or hurling. | mnli | 2 | 329,530 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Rugby and football (soccer) are played at the Lansdowne Road venue in Ballsbridge, and traditional Irish game of hurling at Croke Park.
hypothesis: You can drop by whenever to watch a game of rugby or hurling.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: What on earth is Emanuel talking about?
hypothesis: Does anybody know what Emanuel is speaking of? | mnli | 2 | 51,463 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: What on earth is Emanuel talking about?
hypothesis: Does anybody know what Emanuel is speaking of?
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: no i can't hear them
hypothesis: I hear them clearly. | mnli | 0 | 365,673 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: no i can't hear them
hypothesis: I hear them clearly.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Slim rose resentfully.
hypothesis: Slim got down. | mnli | 2 | 166,167 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Slim rose resentfully.
hypothesis: Slim got down.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: And, as for the type of respect we Machiavelli's advice--that it is better to be feared than loved--will make much less sense in the 21 st century than it did in the 16 th . Goodwill toward America is becoming a national-security asset worth cultivating.
hypothesis: Goodwill towards American has nothing to do with national security. | mnli | 2 | 296,046 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: And, as for the type of respect we Machiavelli's advice--that it is better to be feared than loved--will make much less sense in the 21 st century than it did in the 16 th . Goodwill toward America is becoming a national-security asset worth cultivating.
hypothesis: Goodwill towards American has nothing to do with national security.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Generousassociates is a Washington, D.C.-based Web site that enables lawyers to make a donation to the Legal Aid Society of D.C.
hypothesis: Generousassociates facilitates donations over $1mllion to Legal Aid Society. | mnli | 1 | 242,475 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Generousassociates is a Washington, D.C.-based Web site that enables lawyers to make a donation to the Legal Aid Society of D.C.
hypothesis: Generousassociates facilitates donations over $1mllion to Legal Aid Society.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: i know we get cut off all the time too
hypothesis: It is often that we are cut off. | mnli | 1 | 68,299 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i know we get cut off all the time too
hypothesis: It is often that we are cut off.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: While it's true that expansion temporarily diluted the talent pool, the DH artificially increased offense, and players have gained the economic upper hand, there is a widespread consensus that the quality of the game itself is as good as or better than ever . Improvements in hitting have been matched by craftier pitching (by such hurlers as Atlanta's Greg Maddux and Baltimore's Mike Mussina).
hypothesis: The pool of talent broadened with the expansion. | mnli | 1 | 10,623 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: While it's true that expansion temporarily diluted the talent pool, the DH artificially increased offense, and players have gained the economic upper hand, there is a widespread consensus that the quality of the game itself is as good as or better than ever . Improvements in hitting have been matched by craftier pitching (by such hurlers as Atlanta's Greg Maddux and Baltimore's Mike Mussina).
hypothesis: The pool of talent broadened with the expansion.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Whatever had been done to them--or perhaps the absence of a true soul, whatever that was--left them rigidly bound to their past ideas and totally incapable of doing more than following orders by routine now.
hypothesis: Even without souls they could do whatever they wanted. | mnli | 2 | 155,993 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Whatever had been done to them--or perhaps the absence of a true soul, whatever that was--left them rigidly bound to their past ideas and totally incapable of doing more than following orders by routine now.
hypothesis: Even without souls they could do whatever they wanted.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The Vikings also left a legacy in unusual place names, such as Ullswater and Patterdale.
hypothesis: Some unusual place names are the result of Viking influences. | mnli | 0 | 81,689 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Vikings also left a legacy in unusual place names, such as Ullswater and Patterdale.
hypothesis: Some unusual place names are the result of Viking influences.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Much of this historic structure was demolished by storms in 1983, prompting restoration to its original look.
hypothesis: Storms destroyed much of its historic structure in 1983. | mnli | 2 | 136,856 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Much of this historic structure was demolished by storms in 1983, prompting restoration to its original look.
hypothesis: Storms destroyed much of its historic structure in 1983.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: i know i we're in Maryland but my i from Pennsylvania and my parents how are forced recycling
hypothesis: i liked Pennsylvania a lot better than Maryland | mnli | 0 | 271,413 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: i know i we're in Maryland but my i from Pennsylvania and my parents how are forced recycling
hypothesis: i liked Pennsylvania a lot better than Maryland
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The museum hosts and mounts temporary exhibits of contemporary artists.
hypothesis: The museum also hosts exhibits for classic artists. | mnli | 1 | 277,966 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The museum hosts and mounts temporary exhibits of contemporary artists.
hypothesis: The museum also hosts exhibits for classic artists.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Bio-augmented tech.'
hypothesis: Technology augmenting nature. | mnli | 1 | 217,575 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Bio-augmented tech.'
hypothesis: Technology augmenting nature.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: If that is the goal, he thought we should be examining how to accomplish screening.
hypothesis: We probably should be examining how to accomplish screening based on the goal. | mnli | 2 | 40,741 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: If that is the goal, he thought we should be examining how to accomplish screening.
hypothesis: We probably should be examining how to accomplish screening based on the goal.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: purposes we do not need great accuracy, we only need reasonable estimates in order to examine the sensitivity of total unit cost to volume per capita.
hypothesis: They were able to put with actual numbers after the fact. | mnli | 1 | 137,040 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: purposes we do not need great accuracy, we only need reasonable estimates in order to examine the sensitivity of total unit cost to volume per capita.
hypothesis: They were able to put with actual numbers after the fact.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: The long trade routes north and east that came together in Egypt for centuries made it a marketplace for many spices.
hypothesis: People came from other countries to buy spices in Egypt. | mnli | 0 | 240,957 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The long trade routes north and east that came together in Egypt for centuries made it a marketplace for many spices.
hypothesis: People came from other countries to buy spices in Egypt.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: or or you know grant you with their presence you know
hypothesis: Cats want you to pay attention to them when they want attention. | mnli | 2 | 368,649 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: or or you know grant you with their presence you know
hypothesis: Cats want you to pay attention to them when they want attention.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: "Agreed."Drew urged his horse on toward the front of the train where they wouldn't have to breathe the dust.
hypothesis: Drew had bought and reared his horse for long journeys. | mnli | 1 | 363,424 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: "Agreed."Drew urged his horse on toward the front of the train where they wouldn't have to breathe the dust.
hypothesis: Drew had bought and reared his horse for long journeys.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Even popular arts such as advertising, the cinema, comic strips, and fashion are elevated to the level of high culture, with their own museums and festivals.
hypothesis: Fashion is the most lucrative form of high culture. | mnli | 0 | 315,716 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Even popular arts such as advertising, the cinema, comic strips, and fashion are elevated to the level of high culture, with their own museums and festivals.
hypothesis: Fashion is the most lucrative form of high culture.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Fundamentalists took to the streets to protest against the Muslim slaughter of cows.
hypothesis: Fundamentalists treat cows as friends of humans, thus the enrage. | mnli | 0 | 217,477 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Fundamentalists took to the streets to protest against the Muslim slaughter of cows.
hypothesis: Fundamentalists treat cows as friends of humans, thus the enrage.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: was that on the radio every week
hypothesis: That DJ was on the radio every week. | mnli | 2 | 90,926 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: was that on the radio every week
hypothesis: That DJ was on the radio every week.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: oh it's northern well i've been i've been everywhere i've lived overseas for TI for ten years uh four four years in Malaysia rather seven years and three years in the Philippines and i lived in Pittsburgh before i came here i was raised in New England so it's but i've been here thirty two years so i sort of consider myself a Texan i got a
hypothesis: I lived in the Philippines for ten years and four months. | mnli | 0 | 21,230 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: oh it's northern well i've been i've been everywhere i've lived overseas for TI for ten years uh four four years in Malaysia rather seven years and three years in the Philippines and i lived in Pittsburgh before i came here i was raised in New England so it's but i've been here thirty two years so i sort of consider myself a Texan i got a
hypothesis: I lived in the Philippines for ten years and four months.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Going to upset our delicate multicultural balance.
hypothesis: Our multicultural balance might only be upset a little by this. | mnli | 2 | 380,768 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Going to upset our delicate multicultural balance.
hypothesis: Our multicultural balance might only be upset a little by this.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The arguments she had adduced rang true.
hypothesis: Her reasoning was very convincing. | mnli | 2 | 271,524 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The arguments she had adduced rang true.
hypothesis: Her reasoning was very convincing.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The narrow streets near the exquisite 13th- to 15th-century Flam?boy?ant Gothic church of Saint-S??verin ' Rue de la Huchette, Rue de la Harpe, and Rue Saint-S??verin ' give the feeling of a medieval world updated by the cuisines of many countries and stuffy little cinemas.
hypothesis: The Gothic church has some exquisite gargoyle statues watching over the streets. | mnli | 1 | 359,722 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The narrow streets near the exquisite 13th- to 15th-century Flam?boy?ant Gothic church of Saint-S??verin ' Rue de la Huchette, Rue de la Harpe, and Rue Saint-S??verin ' give the feeling of a medieval world updated by the cuisines of many countries and stuffy little cinemas.
hypothesis: The Gothic church has some exquisite gargoyle statues watching over the streets.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: I remember that some people complained President Eisenhower was distracted from the business of his office because he was out playing golf so much.
hypothesis: President Eisenhower never played golf while in office. | mnli | 0 | 91,395 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I remember that some people complained President Eisenhower was distracted from the business of his office because he was out playing golf so much.
hypothesis: President Eisenhower never played golf while in office.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: If Adrin fired, the entire horde would fall on them.
hypothesis: Adrin can fire safely. | mnli | 0 | 137,640 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: If Adrin fired, the entire horde would fall on them.
hypothesis: Adrin can fire safely.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: I have been told that is an old-fashioned, puritanical attitude.
hypothesis: My attitude is old-fashioned. | mnli | 0 | 249,563 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I have been told that is an old-fashioned, puritanical attitude.
hypothesis: My attitude is old-fashioned.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Contrary to previous reports, there is no necrophilia in the film, but there is an orgy.
hypothesis: The film has scenes of an orgy and necrophilia. | mnli | 2 | 238,568 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Contrary to previous reports, there is no necrophilia in the film, but there is an orgy.
hypothesis: The film has scenes of an orgy and necrophilia.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: Ain't no army gonna pull 'em out an' make 'em fight white-man style.
hypothesis: An army ain't going to kidnap them from their homes and make them battle. | mnli | 2 | 224,887 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Ain't no army gonna pull 'em out an' make 'em fight white-man style.
hypothesis: An army ain't going to kidnap them from their homes and make them battle.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: The Blue Mountains are the highest on Jamaica and cover much of the interior of the eastern part of the island.
hypothesis: The Blue Mountains are the second tallest mountains in Jamaica. | mnli | 1 | 56,148 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: The Blue Mountains are the highest on Jamaica and cover much of the interior of the eastern part of the island.
hypothesis: The Blue Mountains are the second tallest mountains in Jamaica.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: He promised that they would be getting in touch with us later on the subject.
hypothesis: As promised, we will be getting updates on the subject in the near future, although they are a bit spotty on updating us, as seen by past work with them. | mnli | 1 | 283,312 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: He promised that they would be getting in touch with us later on the subject.
hypothesis: As promised, we will be getting updates on the subject in the near future, although they are a bit spotty on updating us, as seen by past work with them.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: However, LSC also asked the planners to reopen their consideration of the configuration of the LSC-funded programs believing that a thorough review of this plan leads to the almost inescapable conclusion that while reconfiguration may not be a front-burner issue within this state, there is merit to seriously exploring reconfiguration of the five LSC-funded programs into three.
hypothesis: LSC has stated the program needs no changes. | mnli | 0 | 355,432 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: However, LSC also asked the planners to reopen their consideration of the configuration of the LSC-funded programs believing that a thorough review of this plan leads to the almost inescapable conclusion that while reconfiguration may not be a front-burner issue within this state, there is merit to seriously exploring reconfiguration of the five LSC-funded programs into three.
hypothesis: LSC has stated the program needs no changes.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: I understand, I said, "but ”but don't do anything rash."
hypothesis: I understood and told them to also be patient. | mnli | 1 | 61,832 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: I understand, I said, "but ”but don't do anything rash."
hypothesis: I understood and told them to also be patient.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: "To me that is a feast." Drew fell into the formal speech which seemed natural here.
hypothesis: Drew had resorted to using slang and dialect to blend in. | mnli | 1 | 269,877 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: "To me that is a feast." Drew fell into the formal speech which seemed natural here.
hypothesis: Drew had resorted to using slang and dialect to blend in.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Amen to that, said Dorcas fiercely.
hypothesis: Dorcas didn't agree. | mnli | 1 | 340,583 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Amen to that, said Dorcas fiercely.
hypothesis: Dorcas didn't agree.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Analyzing Postal Service accounts for depreciation, fuel, and maintenance for city delivery carriers, we have estimated the average city delivery vehicle cost per route.
hypothesis: The cost of delivery for Postal Service carriers has been estimated. | mnli | 0 | 71,912 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Analyzing Postal Service accounts for depreciation, fuel, and maintenance for city delivery carriers, we have estimated the average city delivery vehicle cost per route.
hypothesis: The cost of delivery for Postal Service carriers has been estimated.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: (Actually, you could have as many judges as you wanted, as long as you ignored all but one of them.)
hypothesis: You can only have one judge. | mnli | 2 | 146,651 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: (Actually, you could have as many judges as you wanted, as long as you ignored all but one of them.)
hypothesis: You can only have one judge.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: These two palazzos house the Capitoline Museums , whose Greek and Roman collections provide an excellent introduction to the ancient Roman Forum that spreads below it.
hypothesis: The Roman forum was build soon after the second Punic war. | mnli | 0 | 277,070 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: These two palazzos house the Capitoline Museums , whose Greek and Roman collections provide an excellent introduction to the ancient Roman Forum that spreads below it.
hypothesis: The Roman forum was build soon after the second Punic war.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: and uh that gets put in your permanent uh files on your record
hypothesis: It does not go on file. | mnli | 2 | 13,461 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: and uh that gets put in your permanent uh files on your record
hypothesis: It does not go on file.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: But this is still Tubacca and not your camp, Captain.
hypothesis: Captain is at his camp. | mnli | 2 | 44,290 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: But this is still Tubacca and not your camp, Captain.
hypothesis: Captain is at his camp.
### RESPONSE
2
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: At least one intelligent man lived in your world, I'm pleased to know.
hypothesis: Everyone is stupid. | mnli | 0 | 188,551 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: At least one intelligent man lived in your world, I'm pleased to know.
hypothesis: Everyone is stupid.
### RESPONSE
0
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: Sane adolescents seeing either of these films would understand that it is the violent characters who are supposed to be deranged--in the case of The Basketball Diaries because of drugs.
hypothesis: Drug-using adolescents don't understand either film. | mnli | 1 | 379,922 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: Sane adolescents seeing either of these films would understand that it is the violent characters who are supposed to be deranged--in the case of The Basketball Diaries because of drugs.
hypothesis: Drug-using adolescents don't understand either film.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The response accurately reflects the correct answer based on the input.
false: The response does not accurately reflect the correct answer based on the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | false |
premise: yeah yeah what was your degree in
hypothesis: Do you have a degree in something good? | mnli | 1 | 305,296 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: yeah yeah what was your degree in
hypothesis: Do you have a degree in something good?
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer correctly corresponds to the given input.
false: The answer does not correctly correspond to the given input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
premise: no especially if your into any hobbies or anything or
hypothesis: Nah if you have many hobbies there isn't enough time. | mnli | 1 | 148,407 | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, response, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Given a premise sentence and a hypothesis sentence, the task is to predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis (entailment), contradicts the hypothesis (contradiction), or neither (neutral). Return 0 for entailment, 1 for neutral, 2 for contradiction.
### INPUT
premise: no especially if your into any hobbies or anything or
hypothesis: Nah if you have many hobbies there isn't enough time.
### RESPONSE
1
### EVALUATION RUBRIC
true: The answer is appropriate and correctly derived from the input.
false: The answer is inappropriate or incorrectly derived from the input.
### OUTPUT FORMAT
Return a JSON response in the following format:
{
"explanation": "Explanation of why the answer is true or false",
"score": "Final boolean answer between true or false"
}
### EVALUATION | true |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 8