Split (1)

train · 52.4k rows

messages listlengths 2 2
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, determine if it lacks commitment or not. an argument is considered to lack commitment if the author does not commit themselves to their stance on the issue being discussed, but instead expresses a neutral point of view.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The death penalty is a barbaric practice that should be abolished. It is inhumane and cruel, and it does not deter crime. In fact, studies have shown that states with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without it. The death penalty is also expensive, costing taxpayers millions of dollars each year. And finally, it is simply wrong to take someone's life, no matter what they have done.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDetermine which side of a debate has presented stronger evidence by comparing the quality of sources used to support each position.\n\n### Input:\nDebate Topic: Should the United States have a flat tax?\nPro Position: The current tax system is too complicated and unfair. A flat tax would be simpler and more equitable.\nCon Position: A flat tax would be regressive and hurt low-income families.\nSources for Pro Position:\n1. \"The Case for a Flat Tax\" by Arthur Laffer\n2. \"A Simple, Fair, and Growth-Inducing Tax System\" by Robert E. Hall and Alvin Rabushka\n3. \"The Flat Tax\" by Steve Forbes\nSources for Con Position:\n1. \"The Flat Tax Is Not All It's Cracked Up to Be\" by William G. Gale\n2. \"The Flat Tax: A Bad Idea Whose Time Has Come?\" by Joel Slemrod\n3. \"The Flat Tax: An Analysis of Its Effects on Economic Growth and Income Distribution\" by David Altig et al.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The pro position has presented stronger evidence because their sources are from well-known economists who support the idea of a flat tax. The con position's sources are also from economists, but they are less well-known and their arguments against the flat tax are not as convincing.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nIdentify the target of this argumentative essay:\n\n### Input:\nThe death penalty is a controversial topic that has been debated for centuries. Some people believe that it is an effective way to deter crime, while others argue that it is inhumane and does not actually prevent murders from happening. In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished because it is cruel and unusual punishment, it is not an effective deterrent against crime, and there is always the possibility of executing innocent people. First of all, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. It involves killing someone in cold blood, which goes against our basic human rights. Additionally, studies have shown that the death penalty does not actually deter crime; in fact, states with the death penalty tend to have higher murder rates than those without it. Finally, there is always the risk of executing innocent people. DNA testing has exonerated dozens of prisoners who were sentenced to death, proving that mistakes can be made in capital cases. For these reasons, I believe that the death penalty should be abolished.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Death Penalty", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEvaluate the strength of each claim made in this paragraph based on its supporting evidence. rate them from 0 (weakest) to 4 (strongest).\n\n### Input:\nInput: The third claim is that the author has never been caught. This is supported by the fact that he has been able to steal cars without getting caught.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, predict whether or not the writer uses genetic fallacy attacks, i.e., judging something good or bad on its origins, or how it came to be.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the reason why people are so against gay marriage is because they have been taught to be. They were raised in a society where it was not accepted and therefore they do not accept it. It's like racism, if you grow up around racist people then you will most likely become one yourself.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe overall quality of an argument depends on multiple factors such as the clarity of the reasoning, the strength of the evidence provided, and the coherence of the argument. how would you rate the overall quality of the given argument on the scale \"1\" (low), \"2\" (average) or \"3\" (high)?\n\n### Input:\nInput: I think that the death penalty is a good thing because it keeps people from doing bad things. If you know that if you do something wrong then you will be killed, then you won't do it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nA toxic argument can be defined as an argument which might lead to negative effects on the reader, such as offence or confusion. this includes arguments containing loaded language, fallacies, offensive or abusive content, or any other factors which could cause harm to the reader. for instance, saying \"abortion is murder\" is a loaded language. toxic arguments also include those with detrimental orthography (misspelling), missing commitment (not clearly taking sides) or missing intelligibility (hard to understand). given the following argument and the topic of the debate the argument appeared in. decide whether the argument is toxic or not toxic.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Should the death penalty be abolished?\nArgument: I think that the death penalty should not be abolished because it is a good way to get rid of people who are bad and do bad things. If we did not have the death penalty then there would be more crime in the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Toxic", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven twelve propositions, create a paradox involving time travel.\n\n### Input:\n1. The time machine is a device that allows people to travel through time.\n2. Time travel is the act of moving between different points in time, typically using a hypothetical device known as a time machine.\n3. A paradox is a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth.\n4. A grandfather paradox is a paradox of time travel in which inconsistencies emerge through changing the past.\n5. A bootstrap paradox is a paradox of time travel in which information or objects move in closed timelike curves with no discernible beginning or end.\n6. A predestination paradox is a paradox of time travel in which a time traveler is caught in a loop of events that \"predestines\" them to travel back in time.\n7. A temporal paradox is any inconsistency or impossibility of time travel.\n8. A causality loop is a sequence of events (actions, information, objects, people) in which an event is among the causes of another event, which in turn is among the causes of the first-mentioned event.\n9. A parallel universe is a hypothetical self-contained reality co-existing with one's own.\n10. A multiverse is a hypothetical group of multiple universes including the universe in which we live.\n11. A wormhole is a speculative structure linking disparate points in spacetime, and is based on a special solution of the Einstein field equations solved using a Jacobian matrix and determinant.\n12. Spacetime is any mathematical model that fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A man travels back in time to kill his grandfather before he meets his grandmother, thus preventing his own birth. However, if he had never been born, he could not have traveled back in time to kill his grandfather, so he would have been born after all. This creates a paradox because it implies both that he was born and that he was not born.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEthics: ethicists and moral philosophers use argumentation to resolve dilemmas and guide decision-making, using normative principles and case studies to make persuasive arguments.\n\n### Input:\nA doctor has two patients who need organ transplants to survive. One patient needs a heart transplant, and the other needs a kidney transplant. The doctor only has one donor available, and both organs are compatible with both patients. Which patient should receive the transplant?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The patient who needs the heart transplant should receive the transplant. This is because the principle of justice states that we should treat people equally and give them what they deserve. In this case, the patient who needs the heart transplant is more likely to die without the transplant than the patient who needs the kidney transplant, so it would be unjust to give the kidney transplant to the patient who needs the heart transplant.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a list of arguments on a topic, find ones that use fallacy of converse accident wherein they conclude that if a implies b, then b implies a.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be. For example, if a girl watches a movie where the guy is always buying flowers and gifts for his girlfriend, she might expect her boyfriend to do the same thing in real life. If he doesn't, then she might feel like he doesn't love her as much as the guy in the movie loves his girlfriend.\nTopic: Do you think romantic movies give people unrealistic expectations of real-life relationships?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, would you say that the argument has any flaws or not?\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I believe that we should not have the death penalty because it is inhumane and cruel. We are supposed to be a civilized society and yet we still kill people for their crimes. This is wrong and needs to stop.\nFlaw: None", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, identify any potential strengths or advantages of the argument compared to alternative perspectives or solutions.\n\n### Input:\nThe death penalty is a necessary evil. It deters crime, costs less than life in prison, and prevents future murders.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Strength 0: It deters crime\nStrength 1: It costs less than life in prison\nStrength 2: It prevents future murders", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, determine if there are any ad hominem fallacies present - attacking somebody personally rather than engaging with their ideas directly; often used to discredit opponents unfairly while avoiding substantive discussion around key issues involved.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I believe that abortion should be legal because it gives women control over their own bodies and allows them to make decisions about what happens inside of them without having anyone else tell them how they should feel or act regarding those choices. Women deserve respect from society just like men do; therefore, allowing abortions would help create equality between genders by giving both sexes equal rights when making important life-changing decisions such as whether or not one wants children at all times throughout his/her lifetime regardless if he/she has already had some before deciding against having anymore after experiencing certain circumstances within his/her personal situation(s).", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argumentative claim and a list of possible warrants (reasons), select all correct ones.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Claim: Smoking should be banned in all public places.\nWarrant 1: Secondhand smoke is harmful to nonsmokers.\nWarrant 2: Smoking is a fire hazard.\nWarrant 3: Smoking is a nuisance to nonsmokers.\nWarrant 4: Smoking is a leading cause of preventable death.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Warrant 1, Warrant 2, Warrant 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEvaluate how well the author supports his/her point of view throughout the entire post.\n\n### Input:\nI'm not sure whether the death penalty is a good thing or a bad thing. On one hand, it seems like it might deter crime and make sure that criminals are punished for their actions. But on the other hand, it seems like it might be cruel and unusual punishment. I need more information before I can decide which side I'm on.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The author does not support his/her point of view throughout the entire post. He/she provides some reasons and evidence to back up his/her claims, but he/she does not address counterarguments or provide rebuttals to them.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is logically deceptive if the premises do not lead to the stated conclusion or if there are hidden assumptions which make the argument work but are questionable themselves.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Premise: The only way to stop the spread of AIDS is to educate people about it. \nConclusion: We should not teach sex education in schools.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGenerate a claim that contradicts the following claim.\n\n### Input:\nThe death penalty is a good thing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The death penalty is not a good thing.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument has insufficient reasoning if the reasons provided do not support the claim. given the following argument and the topic of the debate the argument appeared in. decide whether the argument has insufficient reasoning or does not have insufficient reasoning\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Should the United States have a flat tax?\nArgument: I think that we should have a flat tax because it would be easier to calculate and there would be less loopholes.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Has Insufficient Reasoning", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nPolitical debate: politicians use argumentation to advocate for their positions, to persuade voters, and to challenge opponents.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Is the death penalty an effective deterrent?\nAdditional Info: Some people believe that capital punishment deters crime and prevents future murders. Others argue that it is inhumane and violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.\nClaim: No\nReason: There is no evidence that the death penalty deters crime.\nWarrant 1: The murder rate in states with the death penalty is higher than in states without it.\nWarrant 2: The murder rate in states with the death penalty is lower than in states without it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Warrant 1: The murder rate in states with the death penalty is higher than in states without it.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nIs the highlighted part an instance of appeal to popularity fallacy? an appeal to popularity fallacy occurs when someone uses the fact that many people believe something as evidence for its truthfulness. for example: “everyone knows that vaccines cause autism.”\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be. However, I don't think it's a bad thing because most people know that the movies are just fiction and not reality.\nHighlighted part: most people know that the movies are just fiction and not reality.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven multiple competing explanations y1,...yn offered for phenomenon z, compare their relative plausibility under specified criteria c1...cm e.g.: simplicity vs explanatory power vs parsimony...", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The phenomenon is that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. The explanations are:\n1) The earth rotates on its axis.\n2) The sun orbits the earth.\n3) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit.\n4) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis.\n5) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system.\n6) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth.\n7) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky.\n8) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars.\n9) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons.\n10) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings.\n11) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings, and the planets have atmospheres.\n12) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings, and the planets have atmospheres, and the planets have magnetic fields.\n13) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings, and the planets have atmospheres, and the planets have magnetic fields, and the planets have weather.\n14) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings, and the planets have atmospheres, and the planets have magnetic fields, and the planets have weather, and the planets have seasons.\n15) The sun moves around the earth, but not in a circular orbit, and the earth also rotates on its axis, and there are other planets in the solar system, and the moon orbits the earth, and the stars are fixed in the sky, and the planets move relative to the stars, and the planets have moons, and the planets have rings", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nYou have been given three sentences that form a chain of reasoning. the first sentence makes a claim, the second provides evidence for the claim, and the third explains why the evidence supports the claim. your task is to evaluate how convincing this chain of reasoning is.\n\n### Input:\nClaim: The minimum wage should be increased.\nEvidence: Increasing the minimum wage would help low-income workers make ends meet.\nExplanation: If increasing the minimum wage would help low-income workers make ends meet, then the minimum wage should be increased.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "This is a convincing chain of reasoning. The evidence supports the claim because if increasing the minimum wage would help low-income workers make ends meet, then the minimum wage should be increased. The explanation provides a clear reason why the evidence supports the claim.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, determine whether it uses tu quoque fallacy by responding to criticism with accusations of hypocrisy instead of addressing substance of critique.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the people who are against gay marriage should be more concerned about their own marriages. If they were so happy with their spouses, then why would they care what other people do? It's not like it affects them in any way.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following argument, decide whether it contains a personal attack ad hominem fallacy. personal attack ad hominem is a fallacy in which, instead of advancing good reasoning, the arguer attacks the person or circumstances of the person who holds the contrary position.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It's not like we're killing innocent people, and it's not like they don't deserve it. If you kill someone, then you should be killed too. That's what I believe.\nFallacy: You are an idiot if you think that the death penalty is a good thing. It's barbaric and inhumane to kill people just because they've done something wrong. You need to get your head out of your ass and realize that there are better ways to deal with criminals than by executing them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument commits tu quoque\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument A: You're just saying that because you're a man.\nArgument B: Your argument is invalid because it does not take into account the fact that there are many different types of people in the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Argument B", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a set of claims related to each other through some kind of relationship like causality, implication, correlation, etc., explain how those relations work together to form an overall thesis statement about something.\n\n### Input:\nClaim 1: The death penalty should be abolished.\nClaim 2: The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment.\nClaim 3: The death penalty does not deter crime.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The death penalty should be abolished because it is cruel and unusual punishment and does not deter crime.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a persuasive essay, assess the author's use of irony or satire. determine whether these techniques effectively convey the author's point of view and challenge the reader's assumptions about the topic.\n\n### Input:\nThe following is an excerpt from a speech by Mark Twain, given at the 1901 Annual Meeting of the Stomach Club in Paris.\nThe stomach is the grand central telephone office of affairs. From it proceed all the messages which govern the profoundest of our activities. It orders us to recruit the army and the navy when disease menaces the public health; it sends policemen swarming into mobs of riotous strikers; it inspires telegraphic invectives when the Christian host is menaced by pagan hordes; it goes down in its own person and speaks to the injurer of the insulted national honor when the country's flag has been grossly affronted. Indeed, it is not too much to say that there is no department of the body which is not governed by orders from the stomach. In conclusion, I will repeat that the stomach is the real vital part of a man; and that all others are only food for it. Eat what you please, gentlemen--there is nothing which does not agree with it. Take my advice, and append to your creed the saving clause of the New Jersey parson, which allows you to break the eighth commandment when the other fellow is doing the same thing. Then you cannot go wrong. Good-night.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nWe distinguish three types of claims: fact, value and policy claims. fact claims refer to facts; they assert something about what exists, has existed, or will exist. value claims express a positive or negative evaluation of something; they assert something about what is good/bad or desirable/undesirable. policy claims recommend actions; they assert something about what should or ought to be done. for example, “i think that the product was defective.”(fact), “the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six“and i find i have to buy a new pair every year or so”(value), and “it seems like the manufacturer needs to improve quality control.”(policy). determine the type of the following claim.\n\n### Input:\nInput: It seems like the manufacturer needs to improve quality control.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "policy", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument with multiple claims, identify the most important claim that contributes the most to the overall argument.\n\n### Input:\nI believe that abortion should be legal. Women have the right to choose what happens to their own bodies, and they should not be forced to carry a pregnancy to term if they do not want to. Abortion is a safe and effective way to end a pregnancy, and it should be available to all women who need it. There are many reasons why a woman might choose to have an abortion, and she should not be judged or shamed for her decision.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The most important claim is \"Women have the right to choose what happens to their own bodies, and they should not be forced to carry a pregnancy to term if they do not want to.\"", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven two arguments debating a philosophical concept, compare their strengths and weaknesses by evaluating how well they support their respective claims, identifying potential flaws in logic or evidence used, examining counterarguments offered against each position taken, etc. rank them according to which one makes stronger case for its viewpoint.\n\n### Input:\nArgument 1: Abortion should be legal because women have the right to choose what happens to their own bodies.\nArgument 2: Abortion should be illegal because it takes away innocent lives.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Both arguments make valid points but neither one can definitively prove whether abortion should be legal or not. While argument 1 emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy over one’s body, argument 2 highlights the sanctity of life and argues that taking away another person’s life is wrong regardless of circumstance. Ultimately, this debate comes down to individual values and beliefs rather than objective facts so there isn't really a clear winner here - both sides present compelling cases for their respective positions on this issue.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEthics: ethicists use argumentation to explore moral dilemmas and principles, engaging in philosophical debates about right and wrong, justice, and social responsibility.\n\n### Input:\nShould we prioritize individual rights or the greater good in making decisions about public health measures during a pandemic?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "In making decisions about public health measures during a pandemic, it is important to consider both individual rights and the greater good. While individual rights are important, they must be balanced against the need to protect the health and safety of the wider community. This means that some restrictions on individual freedoms may be necessary in order to prevent the spread of disease and save lives. However, these restrictions should be proportionate and based on scientific evidence, and efforts should be made to minimize their impact on individuals' rights and freedoms. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a balance between protecting individual rights and promoting the greater good, while also ensuring that any restrictions are fair and just.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nWhich of these sentences would you consider to be a strong argument for the given claim?\n\n### Input:\nClaim: The death penalty should be abolished.\nSentence 1: It is inhumane and barbaric.\nSentence 2: It is ineffective at deterring crime.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Sentence 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nA good argument is well-reasoned and logically sound, while a bad argument is based on faulty reasoning or false assumptions. identify whether the given statement represents a good argument or a bad argument\n\n### Input:\nInput: I think that the US is better off because it has a higher GDP than China. This means that the US is more productive and efficient, and that its citizens have a higher standard of living.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Bad argument", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nArgumentative claims are well-supported if they reflect deep understanding of complex issues and relationships among multiple factors involved.\n\n### Input:\nThe government should not be allowed to monitor the internet.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The government should not be allowed to monitor the internet because it is a violation of privacy. It also allows for the government to control what people see and do online, which can lead to censorship. Additionally, monitoring the internet can be used to track people's movements and activities, which could be used to violate their civil liberties.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is red herring if it introduces irrelevant information to distract from the main point under discussion. red herrings come in many forms; sometimes people use emotionally charged language or personal anecdotes unrelated to the matter at hand just to throw off their opponents. other times, speakers bring up seemingly related issues but fail\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Should we ban smoking?\nArgument: I think that people should be able to smoke if they want to, but not around other people. It's their choice, but it shouldn't affect others.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Red Herring", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, identify the following fallacies: hasty generalization (hg), post hoc ergo propter hoc (ph) and other.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I don't think so. I think that the government should provide free education for all children. This would ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed in life.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "other", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nWe say that an argument contains a circular reasoning fallacy if it assumes the truth of the conclusion in one of its premises. does the argument contain a circular reasoning fallacy?\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The Bible is the word of God. We know this because it says so in the Bible.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nA strawman fallacy occurs when a person misrepresents an opponent's position, then attacks that misrepresented position (the \"straw man\") instead of the opponent's actual position. the purpose of this tactic is to make the opponent's position seem weaker than it actually is. determine whether the following text contains a straw man fallacy or not.\n\n### Input:\nInput: The argument that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime is not valid. If it were, then there would be no murders in states with the death penalty.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument and a list of potential warrants, choose the warrant that best explains the reasoning in this particular argument.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Should the U.S. government provide health care for all citizens?\nAdditional Info: Given the high cost of medical care, should the government step in to help those who can't afford it?\nClaim: The U.S. government should not provide health care for all citizens.\nReason: Health care is too expensive.\nWarrant 1: The government has no business getting involved in people's personal lives.\nWarrant 2: The government cannot afford to pay for everyone's health care.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The government cannot afford to pay for everyone's health care.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a debate topic, identify all the key points from both sides' arguments. a key point can be used to form a concise summary from a large collection of arguments on a given topic.\n\n### Input:\nShould the United States have universal health care?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Key points for Yes:\n1. Universal healthcare would reduce costs.\n2. Universal healthcare would increase access to quality healthcare.\n3. Universal healthcare would improve public health.\n4. Universal healthcare would be more efficient than private insurance.\n5. Universal healthcare is a moral imperative.\n6. Universal healthcare would save lives.\n7. Universal healthcare would reduce medical errors.\n8. Universal healthcare would reduce administrative costs.\n9. Universal healthcare would reduce fraud and abuse.\n10. Universal healthcare would improve patient satisfaction.\nKey points for No:\n1. Universal healthcare would be too expensive.\n2. Universal healthcare would lead to rationing of care.\n3. Universal healthcare would lead to longer wait times.\n4. Universal healthcare would lead to lower quality care.\n5. Universal healthcare would lead to higher taxes.\n6. Universal healthcare would lead to government control of healthcare.\n7. Universal healthcare would lead to less innovation in healthcare.\n8. Universal healthcare would lead to fewer choices for patients.\n9. Universal healthcare would lead to less competition among providers.\n10. Universal healthcare would lead to less accountability for providers.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe confidence with which we hold a belief can vary from low to high. how confident would you say the author is about the truth of the following statement? rate your answer on the scale \"1\" (low), \"2\" (average) or \"3\" (high)?\n\n### Input:\nInput: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It keeps people from doing bad things and it also makes sure that they don't do them again.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following comment-argument pair, determine whether the comment is related to the argument or not.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The ecosystem needs this delicate balance,\nComment: In the absence of wolves and other large predators, humans become the deer population control to keep to deer from over-grazing regional flora.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nA strawman fallacy happens when one defends their own position by misrepresenting someone else’s position in a way that makes it easier to attack. decide whether the argument contains a strawman fallacy or not.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It deters crime, and it's cheaper than keeping someone in prison for life.\nStrawman fallacy: The argument misrepresents the opponent’s position as being against the death penalty because it is not effective at deterring crime.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nConsider the following argument and decide whether you agree with the following statement: the author’s argumentation is appeal to authority because they rely on the opinion of experts or authorities even though those opinions may not be supported by facts or evidence.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It deters crime, and it's also cheaper than keeping someone in prison for life. The only problem with it is that sometimes innocent people are convicted of crimes they didn't commit. But this can be solved by making sure that there is enough evidence to convict someone before sentencing them to death.\nStatement: the author’s argumentation is appeal to authority because they rely on the opinion of experts or authorities even though those opinions may not be supported by facts or evidence.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDetect potential biases in an argument, e.g., confirmation bias, groupthink, availability heuristic, etc...\n\n### Input:\nThe death penalty is a necessary evil. It is the only way to deter crime and keep our society safe. Without the death penalty, criminals would run rampant and our streets would be unsafe. We need the death penalty to protect ourselves and our families.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Groupthink", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nIn persuasive writing, it is important to anticipate counterarguments and address them effectively. critique the author's handling of potential objections in this article and suggest ways they could have strengthened their response.\n\n### Input:\nThe article argues that the government should not be involved in regulating the internet. It claims that the internet is a free and open space, and that any regulation would stifle innovation and creativity. However, the author does not address the potential objections to this argument. For example, some people might argue that the government needs to regulate the internet in order to protect users from harmful content or cybercrime. Others might say that without regulation, large corporations will have too much control over the internet. In order to strengthen their response, the author could have addressed these potential objections head-on. They could have explained why they believe that the benefits of an unregulated internet outweigh the risks, or provided evidence to support their claim that regulation would stifle innovation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The author's handling of potential objections is weak. They do not address the fact that many people believe that the government needs to regulate the internet in order to protect users from harmful content or cybercrime. Additionally, they do not provide any evidence to support their claim that regulation would stifle innovation. In order to strengthen their response, the author could have addressed these potential objections head-on. They could have explained why they believe that the benefits of an unregulated internet outweigh the risks, or provided evidence to support their claim that regulation would stifle innovation.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nBoard games: board game enthusiasts use argumentation to decide rules, resolve disputes, and enjoy competitions.\n\n### Input:\nI think that the rules should be changed so that players can only use one type of piece at a time. This would make the game more fair and balanced.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "I disagree with your suggestion to change the rules of the game. The current rules allow for a lot of variety and creativity in how players can approach the game. If we were to limit players to using only one type of piece at a time, it would take away from the flexibility and freedom that makes the game so much fun.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven two sets of beliefs about a controversial issue, generate an argumentative claim that appeals to both sides.\n\n### Input:\nBelief 1: Climate change is a real and pressing problem that needs to be addressed.\nBelief 2: Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the liberal media.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Climate change is a controversial issue that has been debated for many years. Some people believe that it is a real and pressing problem that needs to be addressed, while others believe that it is a hoax perpetrated by the liberal media. I think that both sides have valid points, but I ultimately believe that climate change is a real and pressing problem that needs to be addressed. This is because there is overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is happening and that it is caused by human activity.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argumentative essay, identify the best argument for the author’s position.\n\n### Input:\nThe United States should not have a national health care system. First, it would be too expensive for the government to pay for everyone’s health care. Second, many doctors and hospitals would refuse to take part in such a program because they would earn less money than they do now. Third, people who are healthy would resent having to pay for those who are sick.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "First, it would be too expensive for the government to pay for everyone’s health care.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAbortion is a deeply personal decision that should always remain between a woman and her doctor. banning abortion would force women into dangerous back alley procedures, putting their health and safety at risk. instead of criminalizing abortion, let's work towards making sure every woman has access to safe and affordable reproductive healthcare services.\n\n### Input:\nAbortion is a deeply personal decision that should always remain between a woman and her doctor. banning abortion would force women into dangerous back alley procedures, putting their health and safety at risk. instead of criminalizing abortion, let's work towards making sure every woman has access to safe and affordable reproductive healthcare services.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Abortion is a deeply personal decision that should always remain between a woman and her doctor. Banning abortion would force women into dangerous back alley procedures, putting their health and safety at risk. Instead of criminalizing abortion, let's work towards making sure every woman has access to safe and affordable reproductive healthcare services.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following argument, decide whether it contains a fallacy of equivocation. an equivocation occurs when the meaning of some significant word or phrase changes in the middle of an argument without warning.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The Bible says that God created the world in six days. But a day is defined as one rotation of the earth on its axis. Since the earth didn't exist until the third day, how could there be light and darkness before then? Therefore, the Bible is wrong.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEthical: ethicists use argumentation to examine moral dilemmas and justify ethical judgments.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be. Yes, the expectations raised by romantic movies are damaging to real relationships.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Ethical", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDecide whether the argument contains a begging the question fallacy or not. begging the question is a type of logical fallacy in which the conclusion is assumed within one of the premises.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The Bible is the word of God. We know this because it says so in the Bible.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nA tu quoque fallacy occurs when someone tries to discredit an argument by pointing out that the person making the argument has done something similar themselves. for example: “you say i’m being hypocritical, but you’re doing exactly what i’m accusing you of doing!”\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the government should be able to regulate what people do with their bodies. If you are going to have a baby, then you should be responsible enough to take care of it. You shouldn't be allowed to just kill it because you don't want it.\nCounterargument: But you're saying that the government should be able to tell people what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. That's exactly what you're accusing me of doing!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEvaluate how well structured and organized an essay is in terms of its introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.\n\n### Input:\nInput: The death penalty is a controversial topic. Some people believe that it is a necessary evil, while others believe that it is barbaric and inhumane. There are pros and cons to both sides of the argument.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argumentative text, evaluate the author's use of hyperbole and exaggeration and determine whether they are effective in making a point or simply distracting from the argument being made.\n\n### Input:\nI'm so sick of people complaining about everything. It's like they can't be happy with anything in their lives. If you don't like something, just change it or stop whining about it!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The author's use of hyperbole and exaggeration is not effective in making a point. The language is overly aggressive and dismissive, which makes it difficult to take the argument seriously.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nArgumentation refers to the process of presenting reasons and evidence to support a particular position or viewpoint. does the following text contain an argument?\n\n### Input:\nInput: The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six months and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so. But for $20, it's not a big deal.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nPhilosophy: philosophers use argumentation to explore ethical dilemmas, examine metaphysical questions, and critique philosophical theories.\n\n### Input:\nWhat is the nature of reality?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The nature of reality is a complex question that has been debated by philosophers for centuries. There is no one answer that can be agreed upon by everyone, as different people have different perspectives on what reality is. Some believe that reality is objective and exists independently of our perceptions, while others believe that reality is subjective and depends on our individual experiences. Ultimately, the nature of reality is something that each person must decide for themselves.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argumentative discourse unit (adu), identify its coherence: cohesive, disjointed, fragmented, etc.\n\n### Input:\nInput: ADU: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "cohesive", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nWhich of the following statements best describes the relation between elementary unit x for proposition y in the same argument?\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I have been using this product for about 2 months now and it has worked great. It was easy to install and the instructions were very clear. The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six“and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so.\nElementary unit x: The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six“and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so.\nProposition y: I have been using this product for about 2 months now and it has worked great.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "x is a reason for y", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe author tries to convince by using an emotional appeal.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be. For example, in the movie \"The Notebook\", Noah and Allie are separated for a long time but then find each other again and fall back in love. This is not realistic because it is very rare that two people who have been apart for so long will get back together. It also makes people feel like they are really making an impact on the environment by doing something that is very easy and doesn't take much time to do.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is a hasty generalization if it makes assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). decide whether the argument has hasty generalization or does not have hasty generalization\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I am not sure if this is true or not, but I heard that in some countries they do not allow women to drive cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No Hasty Generalization", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEach question consists of two parts: first, read through both sides of the debate carefully before deciding who made the better case overall. then explain why you chose the side you did by highlighting specific points raised during the course of the discussion.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Should the U.S. government provide health care for all citizens?\nAdditional Info: The United States is one of the few industrialized nations that does not guarantee health care to its citizens. Some argue that this is a basic human right, while others believe it would be too expensive and lead to rationing.\nSide 1: I think that the US should provide healthcare for all citizens because it is a basic human right. Everyone deserves to have access to quality medical care, regardless of their income or social status. Providing universal healthcare would also help to reduce costs in the long run, as people would be more likely to seek preventive care instead of waiting until they are seriously ill. Additionally, it would improve public health overall by ensuring that everyone has access to vaccinations and other important treatments.\nSide 2: I don't think that the US should provide healthcare for all citizens because it would be too expensive and lead to rationing. Healthcare is already very costly, and adding millions of new patients would only make things worse. There simply isn't enough money available to pay for everyone's medical bills, so some people would inevitably end up being denied treatment. This could result in serious health problems or even death for those who can't afford private insurance. Additionally, providing free healthcare would create an incentive for people to abuse the system by seeking unnecessary treatments or procedures.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Side 1 made the better case overall because they provided specific examples of how universal healthcare would benefit both individuals and society as a whole. They also addressed potential objections raised by Side 2, such as cost concerns, by pointing out that preventive care can actually save money in the long run. Overall, I found their argument to be more convincing than Side 2's, which focused mainly on financial considerations without taking into account the human impact of denying people access to necessary medical care.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a set of arguments, find any instances where the writer uses groupthink or conforming to group consensus despite holding private reservations.\n\n### Input:\nI'm not sure if I agree with the death penalty. On one hand, it seems like a good way to punish criminals who have committed heinous crimes. But on the other hand, there are so many cases of wrongful convictions and executions that it makes me wonder if this is really the best way to go about things.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nIs there anything missing from this claim that would help strengthen its validity?\n\n### Input:\nThe death penalty is a necessary evil.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The death penalty is a necessary evil because it deters crime and provides justice for victims.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven philosophical ideas, predict epistemological debates.\n\n### Input:\nThe world is a simulation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "If the world is a simulation, then it is possible that we are living in a computer program. This would mean that our reality is not real, and that everything we experience is just an illusion. Some people might argue that this is impossible, because they believe that there is no way to create a perfect simulation of reality. However, others might say that it is possible, and that we may never know for sure if we are living in a simulation or not.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGenerate a response to a claim on a controversial topic while taking into account the user’s beliefs.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Should marijuana be legalized?\nClaim: Marijuana should not be legalized because it is a gateway drug.\nUser Beliefs: I believe that marijuana should be legalized for both medicinal and recreational use. I think that the potential benefits of legalization, such as increased tax revenue and decreased crime rates, far outweigh any potential risks. Additionally, I do not believe that marijuana is a gateway drug, as there is no scientific evidence to support this claim.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "While I understand your concern about marijuana being a gateway drug, I do not agree with your position on this issue. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that marijuana leads to the use of harder drugs, and in fact, many people who use marijuana never go on to try other substances. Additionally, legalizing marijuana could bring in significant tax revenue for states and reduce crime rates associated with illegal drug trafficking. For these reasons, I believe that marijuana should be legalized for both medicinal and recreational purposes.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following two argumentative discourse units, decide whether they have same/similar conclusion.\n\n### Input:\nInput: ADU1: The only way to stop this is to make it illegal for people to own guns.\nADU2: I think that the best way to prevent gun violence is to ban guns.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nConsider the following argument: \"smoking causes lung cancer therefore everyone who smokes gets lung cancer.\" what kind of logical fallacy does this represent? explain your answer briefly.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: \"smoking causes lung cancer therefore everyone who smokes gets lung cancer.\"\nExplanation: The argument is a hasty generalization because it assumes that all smokers will get lung cancer, when in fact there are many other factors that can contribute to the development of lung cancer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Hasty generalization", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is irrelevant if it provides no evidence for or against the conclusion. decide whether the given argument is irrelevant (yes/no).\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I believe that the death penalty is wrong because it is cruel and unusual punishment. It also does not deter crime, as many studies have shown.\nConclusion: The death penalty should be abolished.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following argument, detect whether there are any non sequitur fallacies present - when someone makes a claim that does not logically follow from their evidence.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: It is true that social media is very beneficial for staying in contact with people far away, but because there are no limits teens often wind up spending more time in that virtual world than in the real world. This leads to them being less social and having fewer friends in reality.\nFallacy: The conclusion does not follow from the premise.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe argument is not sufficiently developed because it fails to address potential counterarguments.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six months and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so. But at this price point, I'm willing to do that.\nCounterargument: The product arrived damage[d], but I was able to return it and get a replacement.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argumentation should be seen as locally sufficient if it provides adequate reasons for believing its conclusion. adequate reasons must meet several criteria: they must be true; they must support the conclusion; they must address possible counter-arguments; and they must be appropriate in kind and degree to the context. in addition, the argumentation must make explicit the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. please judge about local sufficiency according to whether these conditions hold. how would you rate the local sufficiency of the author’s argumentation on the scale \"1\" (low), \"2\" (average) or \"3\" (high)?\n\n### Input:\nInput: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It keeps people from doing bad things and it also makes sure that they don't do them again.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe following are examples of arguments that might be used in support of various positions on this issue: [1] we should allow students to use their own devices because they will learn better when they have access to technology; [2] allowing students to bring their own devices into school could lead to distraction and cheating; [3] some schools already allow byod so we shouldn't ban them completely; etc.. which one do you find most convincing?\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument 1: The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six months and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so.\nArgument 2: I've had these for over a year now, and they still sound great. They are very comfortable, and the noise cancellation works well enough that I can listen to music at work without being distracted by my coworkers' conversations.\nArgument 3: These headphones are amazing! I love how they block out all outside noise while still letting me hear what's going on around me. They're also super comfy and fit perfectly in my ears. Definitely worth the money!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "[2]", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a debate topic and two arguments from the same side, decide which one is more persuasive.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Should the United States have universal health care?\nArgument A: The US is one of the only developed countries that does not have universal healthcare. It is a shame that we are so far behind other countries in this regard.\nArgument B: I think it would be great if everyone had access to affordable healthcare, but I don't think the government should be involved in providing it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Argument A", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven two claims, determine which one leads to the correct conclusion most directly.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Claim 1: The government should not be allowed to regulate the internet.\nClaim 2: The government should not be allowed to regulate the internet because it is a form of free speech.\nConclusion: The government should not be allowed to regulate the internet.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Claim 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is considered to have missing commitment when the author shows a lack of belief in their own claims. this can happen when an author makes a claim without providing any evidence or reasoning to support it, or when they present conflicting information that undermines their position. in general, arguments with missing commitment are less convincing and may be seen as untrustworthy or unreliable.\n\n### Input:\nThe government should not be allowed to censor the internet because it is a violation of our freedom of speech. However, there are some cases where censorship may be necessary, such as when it comes to protecting children from harmful content.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "False", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, identify whether it relies on evidence obtained through observation or experimentation.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I have a 2004 Honda Accord and it has been the best car I've ever owned. It's very reliable, comfortable, and gets great gas mileage. I would recommend this car to anyone.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is said to be off-topic if it addresses an issue that is unrelated to the main topic of the debate. given a sentence and a topic, decide whether the sentence is off-topic or on-topic.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Is it ethical to use animals for research and testing?\nSentence: Animals are used in research and testing because they are similar to humans.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "on-topic", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a persuasive essay, critique the author's use of satire, assessing how effectively they use humor, irony, or exaggeration to criticize or expose flaws or vices in society or individuals in order to promote change or reform.\n\n### Input:\nIn recent years, there has been a growing trend of people choosing to live in tiny houses. These homes are typically less than 400 square feet, and often much smaller. While some people see this as a way to downsize and simplify their lives, others view it as a sign of poverty or desperation. I believe that living in a tiny house is a great way to save money and reduce your environmental impact. However, I also think that it's important to be realistic about what you can and cannot do in such a small space. If you're considering making the switch to a tiny house, here are a few things you should keep in mind.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The author uses satire effectively to criticize the trend of people choosing to live in tiny houses. They use humor to point out the absurdity of some of the arguments made in favor of tiny houses, and irony to highlight the hypocrisy of those who claim to be environmentally conscious while living in such small spaces. The exaggeration used by the author helps to drive home the point that this is not a sustainable lifestyle choice for everyone.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nEconomics: economists apply argumentation methods to evaluate public policies, market trends, and economic models by weighing costs, benefits, and trade-offs.\n\n### Input:\nThe government should provide universal healthcare coverage.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Providing universal healthcare coverage would ensure that all citizens have access to necessary medical care regardless of their ability to pay. This could improve overall public health outcomes and reduce disparities in healthcare access between different socioeconomic groups. However, implementing such a system would require significant financial resources and potentially involve trade-offs with other priorities like education or infrastructure development. Policymakers must carefully consider both the potential benefits and challenges associated with expanding healthcare coverage before making any decisions.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDecide if the given argument has a false dilemma fallacy. false dilemma is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone presents only two options as possible, when there may be more than two options available.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: If you don't believe in God, then you must be an atheist. And if you're an atheist, then you must not believe in anything.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDecide whether the following argument contains a genetic fallacy. a genetic fallacy is when an author judges something based on its origin rather than what it actually says or does.\n\n### Input:\nInput: The argument that the Bible is true because it has been proven to be accurate by archaeologists is not a genetic fallacy. It does not assume that something must be true just because it comes from God.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argumentative essay, extract all propositions that express opinions and classify them according to their sentiment polarity (positive/negative).\n\n### Input:\nInput: Proposition: The only issue I have is that the volume starts to degrade a little bit after about six months and I find I have to buy a new pair every year or so.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "positive", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDecide whether the argument has an acceptable level of politeness or not\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: I think that the death penalty is a good thing. It keeps people from committing crimes and it also makes sure that they don't do it again.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is seen as convincing if its premises and conclusion are true, relevant to each other, sufficient for supporting the conclusion, and consistent with one another. in addition, an argument can be considered convincing if it anticipates objections against it and rebut them effectively. please judge about the persuasiveness of the author’s argument according to these criteria. how would you rate the persuasiveness of the author’s argumentation on the scale \"1\" (low), \"2\" (average) or \"3\" (high)?\n\n### Input:\nInput: The death penalty should be abolished because it is not an effective deterrent for crime. If someone is going to commit a crime they are not thinking about the consequences. They are just thinking about what they want at that moment. Also, if someone is on death row they have nothing to lose by killing again. So why would they stop?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a set of claims, generate an argumentative essay that presents a clear and coherent position on the topic.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Should parents be allowed to spank their children?\nClaim 1: Spanking is a form of child abuse.\nClaim 2: Parents should be able to discipline their children however they see fit.\nClaim 3: Spanking can be an effective way to teach children right from wrong.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Spanking is a form of child abuse. Parents should be able to discipline their children however they see fit. Spanking can be an effective way to teach children right from wrong. While spanking may be considered child abuse by some, it is ultimately up to the parent to decide how to discipline their child. Some parents believe that spanking is an effective way to teach their children right from wrong. Others believe that there are other, more effective methods of discipline. Ultimately, it is up to the parent to decide what is best for their child.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven two arguments on a topic, decide whether they contain similar reasoning.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument 1: The ecosystem needs this delicate balance, In the absence of wolves and other large predators, humans become the deer population control to keep to deer from over-grazing regional flora.\nArgument 2: It is true that social media is very beneficial for staying in contact with people far away, but because there are no limits teens often wind up spending more time in that virtual world than in the real world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, identify which parts are relevant to the discussion of the corresponding big issue.\n\n### Input:\nTopic: Is extreme parenting effective?\nAdditional Info: Does strict control of a child's life lead to greater success or can it be counterproductive?\nArgument: I think that extreme parenting can be effective in some cases, but it really depends on the child. Some children need more structure and discipline than others, so it's important to tailor your parenting style to fit your child's needs. If you're too strict with a child who doesn't need that level of control, it can backfire and make them rebel against you. But if you're too lax with a child who needs more guidance, they may end up getting into trouble. So it's important to find the right balance for each individual child.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Relevant parts: I think that extreme parenting can be effective in some cases, but it really depends on the child. Some children need more structure and discipline than others, so it's important to tailor your parenting style to fit your child's needs. If you're too strict with a child who doesn't need that level of control, it can backfire and make them rebel against you. But if you're too lax with a child who needs more guidance, they may end up getting into trouble. So it's important to find the right balance for each individual child.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nNormative reasoning: interactors use argumentation to justify their actions, defend their values, and resolve conflicts peacefully.\n\n### Input:\nThe government should not be allowed to spy on its citizens.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The government should not be allowed to spy on its citizens because it violates their privacy and civil liberties. It also sets a dangerous precedent for other governments to follow suit, which could lead to a global surveillance state. Additionally, the government has been known to abuse its power in the past, so there is no guarantee that they will use this information responsibly. Finally, spying on citizens can have a chilling effect on free speech and dissent, as people may be afraid to express themselves freely if they know they are being watched.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven an argument, detect whether there are any equivocation fallacies present - given during debate, when speakers use ambiguous language to shift meanings mid-argument.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Argument: The ecosystem needs this delicate balance, In the absence of wolves and other large predators, humans become the deer population control to keep to deer from over-grazing regional flora.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nFor each sentence, determine whether it supports the main point of the review, opposes it, or neither. support means that the sentence agrees with the overall message of the review, while oppose means that the sentence disagrees with the overall message of the review. neither means that the sentence does not express any clear opinion about the product being reviewed.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Review: I have been using this product for about 2 weeks now and it has made a huge difference in my skin. It is very gentle, but effective. My skin feels so much smoother and looks brighter. I will definitely be buying more of this product.\nSentence: I will definitely be buying more of this product.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "support", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nClassify sentences into argumentative and non-argumentative ones.\n\n### Input:\nInput: I am not sure if this is just me, but I can't seem to get these earbuds to stay in my ears.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Non-argumentative", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe task consists of two subtasks: (1) identify all sentences that contain claims; (2) for each claim sentence identified in subtask 1, identify its corresponding evidence set.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "I bought this for my son who is in college. He loves it! It's very sturdy and well-made. The only downside is that it's a bit heavy, but that's to be expected with a laptop this size.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nDetermine which claims could serve as a rebuttal to this argument.\n\n### Input:\nClaim: The death penalty should be abolished.\nReason: It is cruel and unusual punishment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Rebuttal 1: The death penalty is necessary to deter crime.\nRebuttal 2: The death penalty is a just punishment for heinous crimes.\nRebuttal 3: The death penalty is not cruel and unusual punishment.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nArgument summarization involves creating a concise summary of an argument, highlighting the key points and conclusions. this can involve using natural language processing techniques to extract important information from an argument and present it in a condensed form.\n\n### Input:\nThe argument is that the minimum wage should be increased to help low-income workers and reduce income inequality. The author argues that raising the minimum wage would increase the purchasing power of low-wage workers, which would stimulate economic growth and create jobs. Additionally, the author argues that increasing the minimum wage would reduce poverty and improve the standard of living for millions of Americans. However, opponents argue that raising the minimum wage would lead to job losses and hurt small businesses.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The minimum wage should be increased to help low-income workers and reduce income inequality. Raising the minimum wage would increase the purchasing power of low-wage workers, which would stimulate economic growth and create jobs. Increasing the minimum wage would reduce poverty and improve the standard of living for millions of Americans. However, opponents argue that raising the minimum wage would lead to job losses and hurt small businesses.", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nAn argument is missing seriousness if it is\n\n### Input:\nInput: Topic: Should we have a death penalty?\nArgument: I think that if you kill someone you should be killed too. It's only fair. If you take someones life away then yours should be taken away too. You shouldn't get to live your life when you took someone else's away from them. They don't get to live their life anymore so why should you? I think that if you kill someone you should be killed too. It's only fair. If you take someones life away then yours should be taken away too. You shouldn't get to live your life when you took someone else's away from them. They don't get to live their life anymore so why should you?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Lacks Seriousness", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven the following argumentative text and a set of predefined argumentation schemes, identify which scheme is used.\n\n### Input:\nInput: Text: The fact that the majority of scientists believe in global warming is a strong argument for its existence. Scientists are experts in their field and have spent years studying it, so they should know what they're talking about.\nScheme 1: Argument from Expert Opinion\nScheme 2: Argument from Analogy\nScheme 3: Argument from Consequences\nScheme 4: Argument from Example\nScheme 5: Argument from Sign\nScheme 6: Practical Reasoning\nScheme 7: Abductive Reasoning\nScheme 8: Argument from Cause to Effect\nScheme 9: Argument from Correlation to Cause\nScheme 10: Argument from Verbal Classification\nScheme 11: Argument from Popular Opinion\nScheme 12: Argument from Commitment\nScheme 13: Argument from Position to Know\nScheme 14: Argument from Bias\nScheme 15: Argument from Threat\nScheme 16: Argument from Waste\nScheme 17: Slippery Slope Argument\nScheme 18: Argument from Gradualism\nScheme 19: Argument from Vested Interest\nScheme 20: Argument from Adverse Consequences\nScheme 21: Argument from Alternatives\nScheme 22: Argument from Burden of Proof\nScheme 23: Argument from Ignorance\nScheme 24: Argument from Inconsistency\nScheme 25: Argument from Ethical Values\nScheme 26: Argument from Clarity\nScheme 27: Argument from Definition to Value\nScheme 28: Argument from Established Practice\nScheme 29: Argument from Precedent\nScheme 30: Argument from Golden Mean\nScheme 31: Argument from Sunk Costs\nScheme 32: Argument from Tradition\nScheme 33: Argument from Common Practice\nScheme 34: Argument from Popularity\nScheme 35: Argument from Positive Consequences\nScheme 36: Argument from Negative Consequences\nScheme 37: Argument from Authority\nScheme 38: Argument from Fear Appeal\nScheme 39: Argument from Pity\nScheme 40: Argument from Spite\nScheme 41: Argument from Force\nScheme 42: Argument from Emotion\nScheme 43: Argument from Desire\nScheme 44: Argument from Need\nScheme 45: Argument from Obligation\nScheme 46: Argument from Permission\nScheme 47: Argument from Circumstantial Ad Hominem\nScheme 48: Argument from Personal Attack\nScheme 49: Argument from Poisoning the Well\nScheme 50: Argument from Guilt by Association\nScheme 51: Argument from Straw Man\nScheme 52: Argument from False Dilemma\nScheme 53: Argument from Red Herring\nScheme 54: Argument from Tu Quoque\nScheme 55: Argument from Two Wrongs\nScheme 56: Argument from Affirming the Consequent\nScheme 57: Argument from Denying the Antecedent\nScheme 58: Argument from False Cause\nScheme 59: Argument from Begging the Question\nScheme 60: Argument from Composition\nScheme 61: Argument from Division\nScheme 62: Argument from Equivocation\nScheme 63: Argument from Accident\nScheme 64: Argument from Converse Accident\nScheme 65: Argument from Irrelevant Conclusion\nScheme 66: Argument from Ignoring a Common Cause\nScheme 67: Argument from Misleading Vividness\nScheme 68: Argument from Generalization to the Individual\nScheme 69: Argument from the Individual to the General\nScheme 70: Argument from Lack of Evidence\nScheme 71: Argument from Unverifiable Premise\nScheme 72: Argument from Unfalsifiability\nScheme 73: Argument from Relativist Fallacy\nScheme 74: Argument from Wishful Thinking\nScheme 75: Argument from Repetition\nScheme 76: Argument from Politeness\nScheme 77: Argument from Tolerance\nScheme 78: Argument from Fairness\nScheme 79: Argument from Justice\nScheme 80: Argument from Equality\nScheme 81: Argument from Liberty\nScheme 82: Argument from Security\nScheme 83: Argument from Privacy\nScheme 84: Argument from Property Rights\nScheme 85: Argument from Freedom of Speech\nScheme 86: Argument from Freedom of Religion\nScheme 87: Argument from Freedom of Assembly\nScheme 88: Argument from Freedom of the Press\nScheme 89: Argument from Freedom of Movement\nScheme 90: Argument from Freedom of Thought\nScheme 91: Argument from Freedom of Expression\nScheme 92: Argument from Freedom of Association\nScheme 93: Argument from Freedom of Contract\nScheme 94: Argument from Freedom of Choice\nScheme 95: Argument from Freedom of Information\nScheme 96: Argument from Freedom of Belief\nScheme 97: Argument from Freedom of Action\nScheme 98: Argument from Freedom of Conscience\nScheme 99: Argument from Freedom of Opinion\nScheme 100: Argument from Freedom of Inquiry", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Argument from Expert Opinion", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nThe author’s stance on the issue is yes/no/maybe. is this stance consistent with the content of the argument?\n\n### Input:\nInput: Author’s stance: yes\nArgument: I think that, to some extent, romantic movies can leave an impression on viewers about what they think their real life relationships should be. However, I don't think it's a bad thing. It gives people something to strive for and hope for in their own lives.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "Below is an instruction that describes a task, paired with an input that provides further context. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.\n\n### Instruction:\nGiven a topic, write a short argument in favour or against it.\n\n### Input:\nShould the government provide health care?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The government should not provide health care. Health care is a service that can be provided by private companies, and there is no reason for the government to get involved. The government would only make things more complicated and expensive, and it would be better if they stayed out of it.", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.