|
--- |
|
language: |
|
- en |
|
license: apache-2.0 |
|
size_categories: |
|
- 1K<n<10K |
|
task_categories: |
|
- question-answering |
|
tags: |
|
- Reasoning |
|
- LLM |
|
- Encryption |
|
- Decryption |
|
configs: |
|
- config_name: Rot13 |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/Rot13.jsonl |
|
- config_name: Atbash |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/Atbash.jsonl |
|
- config_name: Polybius |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/Polybius.jsonl |
|
- config_name: Vigenere |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/Vigenere.jsonl |
|
- config_name: Reverse |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/Reverse.jsonl |
|
- config_name: SwapPairs |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/SwapPairs.jsonl |
|
- config_name: ParityShift |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/ParityShift.jsonl |
|
- config_name: DualAvgCode |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/DualAvgCode.jsonl |
|
- config_name: WordShift |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: test |
|
path: data/WordShift.jsonl |
|
--- |
|
|
|
# CipherBank Benchmark |
|
|
|
## Benchmark description |
|
|
|
CipherBank, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in cryptographic decryption tasks. |
|
CipherBank comprises 2,358 meticulously crafted problems, covering 262 unique plaintexts across 5 domains and 14 subdomains, with a focus on privacy-sensitive and real-world scenarios that necessitate encryption. From a cryptographic perspective, CipherBank incorporates 3 major categories of encryption methods, spanning 9 distinct algorithms, ranging from classical ciphers to custom cryptographic techniques. |
|
|
|
## Model Performance |
|
|
|
We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on CipherBank, e.g., GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and cutting-edge reasoning-focused models such as o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Our results reveal significant gaps in reasoning abilities not only between general-purpose chat LLMs and reasoning-focused LLMs but also in the performance of current reasoning-focused models when applied to classical cryptographic decryption tasks, highlighting the challenges these models face in understanding and manipulating encrypted data. |
|
|
|
| **Model** | **CipherBank Score (%)**| |
|
|--------------|----| |
|
|Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct |0.55 | |
|
|Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct |0.38 | |
|
|DeepSeek-V3 | 9.86 | |
|
|GPT-4o-mini-2024-07-18 | 1.00 | |
|
|GPT-4o-2024-08-06 | 8.82 | |
|
|gemini-1.5-pro | 9.54 | |
|
|gemini-2.0-flash-exp | 8.65| |
|
|**Claude-Sonnet-3.5-1022** | **45.14** | |
|
|DeepSeek-R1 | 25.91 | |
|
|gemini-2.0-flash-thinking | 13.49 | |
|
|o1-mini-2024-09-12 | 20.07 | |
|
|**o1-2024-12-17** | **40.59** | |
|
|
|
## Please see paper & website for more information: |
|
- [Paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2504.19093) |
|
- [https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19093](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19093) |
|
- [https://cipherbankeva.github.io/](https://cipherbankeva.github.io/) |
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
If you find CipherBank useful for your research and applications, please cite using this BibTeX: |
|
```bibtex |
|
@misc{li2025cipherbankexploringboundaryllm, |
|
title={CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challenges}, |
|
author={Yu Li and Qizhi Pei and Mengyuan Sun and Honglin Lin and Chenlin Ming and Xin Gao and Jiang Wu and Conghui He and Lijun Wu}, |
|
year={2025}, |
|
eprint={2504.19093}, |
|
archivePrefix={arXiv}, |
|
primaryClass={cs.CR}, |
|
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19093}, |
|
} |
|
``` |