mlx-community

/

Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit

like 0

Follow

MLX Community 4.93k

@pcuenq , I created a repo for this model at https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit using the established naming convention, which the other quantizations of this model also use. I think it's important to stick to the convention. I recommend deleting this repo.

I'm curious to know if you used a tool that generated the name for this repo, so that we can change it if necessary to use the naming convention.

I used mlx-my-repo.

This repo already has some downloads, so deleting it could potentially break things. I'm happy to rename it, because renaming will automatically redirect the old name to the new one.

Yes, this must be the source of the divergently named repos that I've been seeing lately. How can we change MLX My Repo to use the established convention? This is going to create problems as long as it doesn't get changed.

I've asked @reach-vb to fix it here: https://github.com/ml-explore/mlx-examples/discussions/1130

I can take a look too. Do you have some pointers on the ways the community is using these naming conventions?

So if you rename yours to anything I'll adopt the mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit name here, @depasquale .

I'm not sure what other people are doing, but I'm using the established convention in Local Chat to group models with different quantizations in a UI. I often type model names into the search field in Hugging Face with this in mind.

I deleted mine. You can go ahead and rename this one.

Renamed. FWIW, I think mentioning mlx in the model name (not just the org) may be helpful in some cases.

But happy to try to adapt to the way the community is using it.

I can see it being helpful if the model is outside of the MLX Community, but otherwise I think it's redundant.