text
stringlengths
2
6.14k
file_name
stringclasses
10 values
node_id
stringlengths
36
36
Metabolic scaling in small life forms Mark E. Ritchie & Christopher P. Kempes March 4, 2024 Abstract Metabolic scaling is one of the most important patterns in biology. Theory explaining the 3/4-power size-scaling of biological metabolic rate does not predict the non-linear scaling observed for smaller life forms. Here we present a new model for cells <10−8m3that maximizes power from the reaction-displacement dynamics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Maximum metabolic rate is achieved through an allocation of cell volume to optimize a ratio of reaction velocity to molecular movement. Small cells<10−17m3generate power under diffusion by diluting enzyme con- centration as cell volume increases. Larger cells require bulk flow of cy- toplasm generated by molecular motors. These outcomes predict curves with literature-reported parameters that match the observed scaling of metabolic rates for unicells, and predicts the volume at which Prokary- otes transition to Eukaryotes. We thus reveal multiple size-dependent physical constraints for microbes in a model that extends prior work to provide a parsimonious hypothesis for how metabolism scales across small life.Introduction Understanding how and why organisms differ in their demand for and use of resources is a key objective of biologists [1–3] and critical to understanding the response of biodiversity and ecosystem function to global changes [4, 5]. A fundamental and often-debated pattern is how metabolic rate, B, scales with body mass, M[1, 6, 7], followng the form B=B0Mβ. (1) Data for vertebrates and vascular plants [8–12]show an average interspe- cific scaling exponent of 3/4. This relationship has inspired diverse theories [10, 11, 13–15], including the network model, which derives 3/4 from the need for organisms to supply the entire body volume with resources from vascular resource distribution networks that minimize energy dissipation. More recent analyses [1, 16–20] that include organisms from the smallest 11 orders of mag- nitude in size that largely lack vascular distribution networks, show a variable 1arXiv:2403.00001v1 [physics.bio-ph] 16 Dec 2023
2403.00001v1.pdf
50f07c49-d1f4-462b-9b35-d3109cf78c61
metabolic scaling exponent that changes across size ranges from scaling expo- nents as high as 2 – super-linear scaling – for the smallest range and near 3/4 for the largest organisms. Understanding the basis for this variation is impor- tant, as many different organism features can be derived from this metabolic scaling, including how maximum growth rates and ribosomal abundances scale with cell size along with key tradeoffs between features [21, 22]. However, there is no general, parsimonious theory derived from physical and chemical principles that addresses this size-dependent scaling for these smallest organisms [16]. Here we propose a combined thermodynamic and reaction description of metabolic rate for a cell. We assume that natural selection will favor organisms that can perform more work per time (power) for material synthesis, replica- tion, repair, locomotion, and other cellular functions [23]. While often co-limited by materials in the environment, optimizing this power faces cellular trade-offs concerning both environmental and intra-cellular physical constraints.Conse- quently, we optimize cellular features to maximize the free energy produced by the conversion of chemical substrates to products, where heat and products may inhibit metabolism if not moved away from reaction sites. This thermodynamic approach provides a framework for considering the two processes, conversion and displacement, simultaneously. Thermodynamics of reaction and molecular dis- placement We assume that work is proportional to the volume of reactive surface, where macromolecular catalytic enzymes are freely dispersed in the cytoplasm or at- tached to the membranes, cytoskeleton, and/or other organelles within the en- tity [24]. However, a portion of cell volume is needed to allow substrates from the environment to reach reaction surfaces and to allow displacement of reac- tion products away from reaction structures. This sets up a conflict between the volume devoted to metabolic processes and that devoted to transport. Here we derive a physical and chemical principles-based theory for metabolic scaling for metabolic rate across the roughly 11 orders of magnitude in volume of or- ganisms that lack branching vascular systems.
2403.00001v1.pdf
30c34430-9648-4d4f-8d96-0e2383bd6fef
We describe metabolism from a reaction-displacement thermodynamic system centered on or near reaction surfaces and its generation of free energy within a spherical space otherwise obstructed by surfaces at which reactions occur. Our framework applies to uni- cellular Prokaryotes, Archaea, and Eukaryotes along with eukaryotic organelles. Our basic model, which we expand on in stages, is to consider metabolism in a sphere described by the following reaction-diffusion model ∂A ∂t=D1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kAZ ∂P ∂t=D1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kAZ (2) 2
2403.00001v1.pdf
60c7fa43-505f-49b1-b82f-8ca9e092e0bf
where the product, P(r), substrate, A(r), and enzyme, Z(r), concentrations (mol m−3) are all a function of radius, r, inside a sphere, and where the dynamics are one dimensional in spherical coordinates with spherical symmetry. Additionally, k=kcat/KMis the reaction constant ((m3mol−1s−1)) and Dis a displacement coefficient (e.g. molecular diffusivity in some cases) and has units of (m2s−1) so that each rate is a change in concentration (mol m−3 s−1). We consider the steady-state dynamics, representing a persistent entity and its metabolism in a fixed environment over time, allowing us to solve for closed-form solutions of P(r) and A(r) under a given concentration of Z(see SI).The steady-state free energy production at any location in the cell is given by J∗(r) =kRTA∗ZlnA∗Keq P∗ (3) where Keqis the equilibrium constant of the energy producing reaction (which can be interrelated with ∆ G0),Tis temperature, and Ris the ideal gas constant. The entire metabolism (given as a power in watts) of the entire cell is then described by B= 4πkRTZ 1−3Ve(rc) 4πr3cZrc 0x2A(x) lnKeqA(x) P(x) dx (4) where rcis the radius of the cell and Veis the essential volume required for other for other cellular materials, such as DNA, and is unavailable for energy generation. In this system, we can maximize power (free energy/time), B(Watts), as a function of Z. If there were no tradeoffs, then Bwould be maximized by the largest feasible Zat a given size (a cell full of enzymes).
2403.00001v1.pdf
69527728-14da-4b85-baae-a6afc8e31952
However, the need to move substrate into different regions of the cell and to displace products away from reaction sites introduces a trade-off between the effective diffusion coefficient, D, and enzyme concentration, Z. An increase in Zcorresponds to a decrease in diffusivity [25, 26], and this leads to an optimal enzyme concentration corresponding to a maximal metabolic rate (see SI). 1 Optimal tradeoffs Maximizing power over the whole cell, at a given cell size rcsubject to vari- ation in the concentration of enzymes, Z, we find that the optimal enzyme concentration Z∗follows Z=1 e6KeqD0 kr2c1/(1−γ) (5) where γis the scaling between diffusivity and enzyme concentration at high enzyme concentrations, and D0is the normalization constant for that scaling relationship (see SI). Remarkably, this relationship shows that the optimal en- zyme concentration in cells can be predicted from a few fundamental thermo- dynamic, Keq, and kinetic, k, constants (Figure 1). Note that Z∗depends on 3
2403.00001v1.pdf
a37d4140-f667-4d9e-a678-1e3982998a11
a ratio of reaction rate, k, to a diffusivity normalization for small molecules in the cytoplasm, D0. Using the known relationship for diffusivity with enzyme concentration, where γ≈ −3/2 for sufficiently high concentrations [26], we obtain Z=Z0V−4/15 c . (6) Previous studies have shown that total protein count scales with cell size following a power law with an exponent <1 [22], but these relationships have no fundamental explanation. Our optimization predicts that protein concentra- tion should become more dilute as cells become larger following an exponent of −4/15≈ −0.27, which is indistinguishable from the best fit exponent to data of−0.30±0.06 (Figure 1).10-2110-2010-1910-1810-1710-160.0050.0100.0500.1000.500 Cell Volume(m3)Enzyme Concentration(mol/m3)PredictionBest Fit PredictionMedian -4-20246810020040060080010001200 Log10(k)Frequency Figure 1: (A) The scaling of the concentration of a single enzyme with cell volume. The solid line is the prediction from our theory (exponent = 0 .27) and the dashed line is the best fit to data (exponent = 0 .30±0.06) compiled across the range of bacteria (calculated from total protein abundance scaling in [22]). (B) The distribution of kvalues for a few thousand enzymes [27] with the median value show in red compared to the best fit of our model (dashed black line). The prediction for Zwas determined by optimizing metabolic rate and so we also predict the relationship for maximum metabolic rate: B=B0V11/15 c 1−ve Vc .
2403.00001v1.pdf
bc737b29-a7a9-42de-8df7-6045ee6debf2
(7) Here B0is a constant that is a complicated function of diffusivity, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters (see SI), and Veis the volume of other essential macromolecules which follows Ve=v0Vα cwith α= 0.83 [22]. Metabolic scaling Equation 7 provides excellent agreement with observed metabolic rates for prokaryotes (Fig. 2). Metabolic rate has strong, non-power law curvature for 4
2403.00001v1.pdf
0cef885f-6e74-41b3-be88-fda4844fa6ba
10-1910-1610-1310-1010-1610-1210-8 Cell Volume(m3)Metabolic Rate(W) = 1.26β = 1/3β = 0.90βProkaryotesEukaryotesFigure 2: The prediction for prokayote (red) and eukaryote (blue) metabolic rate along with compiled data [16]. The red dashed curve to the right of the Prokaryote data indicates the scaling of metabolism with an exponent of 1 /3 once diffusivity has saturated to the molecular maximum value. Likewise curva- ture of the bulk flow model at the largest sizes results from dilution of enzymes by increasing densities of molecular motors. small cell sizes driven by the volume V erequired for macromolecules not in- volved in reactions, such as DNA, and this is what leads to the apparent super- linear ( β >1) scaling previously observed for prokaryotes [16]. This curvature quickly relaxes for larger cells due to the sublinear ( β <1) scaling of Ve.For cell sizes up to about the volume of E. coli (≈10−18m3) the power law ap- proximation is superlinear (SI Figure 4) with an approximate exponent of 1 .68 which agrees well with the previous estimates of 1 .75 [16]. For larger bacteria, the scaling of Bconverges on the sublinear scaling of 11/15 = 0 .73. For intermediate prokaryote cell sizes, binning the data to re- move oversampling of certain cell volumes and scatter, shows exceptionally good agreement between our model and the data (SI Figure 5). These results are not in conflict with the overall superlinear fit to all of the prokaryotic data [16], but show that this is a consequence of a complicated set of scale transitions and shifting constraints. Thus, downstream models that derive results from the scaling exponent of metabolic rate (e.g. [21, 22]) will gain accuracy and predic- tive power by starting from our more complex model. For example, models of growth which assume a power law for metabolism [21] should incorporate the curvature described in Equation 7. 5
2403.00001v1.pdf
bfe88119-0e98-4d75-9856-3e43ca10357d
Size-dependent failure of diffusion and emergence of transport mechanisms The trade-off between decreasing enzyme concentration and increased diffusivity applies only for high concentrations of the enzyme. Eventually, for large enough cells, sufficiently low enzyme concentrations are reached such that D=Dmax, the maximum diffusivity of small molecules in water (see SI). Once diffusivity saturates, the optimal concentration follows Z∝V−2/3 c (see SI) yielding B∝ V1/3 c(Fig. 2, dashed red curve) and a metabolic rate controlled by diffusion across the cell membrane. Such scaling also avoids thermodynamic shutdown (power = 0) that can occur in the center of larger cells. Shutdown can occur when Dmaxis not fast enough to sufficiently displace reaction products and avoid reaction reversal.These changes may result in body designs, such as large central vacuoles, filamented rods, membrane bound organelles, and extreme polyploidy [22, 28–30] that minimize the potential for interior thermodynamic shutdown, but yield a relatively slow metabolic rate for prokaryotes larger than 10−17m3[22]. With further increases in cell volume, metabolic rate can only be increased by increasing the rate of molecular displacement, as Zis well below the concen- tration that influences diffusivity. A variety of means for increasing transport in cells exist (e.g. [31–40]) with most attributable to the addition of structures, such as molecular motors or transport proteins, that each generate active trans- port of molecules or viscous bulk flow of cytoplasm over at least some local region within the cell. We model this as an enhanced effective diffusivity of Dtrans.We model this as an enhanced effective diffusivity of Dtrans. For example, the movement of molecules along a cytoskeletal network and randomly arranged regions of bulk flow with a random flow direction can each be thought of as random walks with long single steps, and so displacement in the simplest summary model for all of these processes can be described as an enhanced diffusion (e.g. [31, 34–36, 39–42]). A new trade-off is introduced between the space occupied by dedicated transport structures versus the space devoted to catalyzing reactions (enzymes and supporting structures).
2403.00001v1.pdf
629eecb3-2cfd-4824-9237-fec5e5e9c9c6
This ef- fective diffusivity and volume tradeoffs are captured by D′= (1−ρ)Dmax+ρDtrans (8) and ∂A ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kcatAZ ∂P ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kcatAZ0 (9) where Dtrans is the enhanced diffusivity in the region affected by the active transport or bulk flow, ρis the fraction of the average cellular volume that is associated with active transport or bulk flow, and ϵis the ratio of the effec- tive volume of active transport to the volume of the structures generating that 6
2403.00001v1.pdf
5bc31627-e19a-4d96-8a65-8dbdee722b5c
transport (e.g. the ratio of the volume of a region of enhanced transport to a molecular motor or transport protein’s volume). We optimize total metabolic rate (see SI) at a given cell volume as a function ofρand find that ρgrows with cell size following a complicated function (see SI) that scales like ≈V0.10 cfor small cell sizes and ≈V2/3 cin the limit of large cell sizes. This density scaling implies that the volume dedicated to transport structures scales super-linearly with overall cell size ( ≈V1.1 cto≈V5/3 c).Thus, for cell sizes larger than 10−17m3, the effective diffusivity parameter can increase with cell volume but at the expense of an ever-increasing proportion of cell volume devoted to transport. This yields a size-dependent curve for maximum metabolic power in logarithmic space (blue curve in Fig. 3) that fits the available data for metabolic rate of Eukaryotes (again with average transport and reaction kinetic parameters).Over the middle size range of the single cell Eukaryotes, metabolic rate should approximate a power law with an exponent of 0 .90 which agrees very well with the power law fit to data of 0 .90±0.17 [16, 21]. However, the super-linear scaling of the required volume of transport molecules means that motors and transport proteins begin to substantially reduce the volume for reaction structures. This transport volume requirement ultimately may limit metabolic rate, and impose a theoretical upper limit to Eukaryote size of 10−9 m3which compares well to the size of the largest unicellular organisms in the metabolic database (Fig. 2). Discussion These analyses produce a series of metabolic scaling curves (Fig. 2) across a succession of cell (or organism) volume ranges. Each curve is associated with a particular mode of reaction volume and molecular displacement mechanisms, with molecular diffusion at the smallest sizes then with an enhanced diffusion within devoted transport regions at the largest sizes (Fig. 3). Across the size spectrum, optimal metabolic rate is set by the tradeoff be- tween volume for transport and volume for metabolic reactions.
2403.00001v1.pdf
86fdaef6-c7ca-48fd-bcdf-0c6f5426a701
For prokary- otes, the smallest cells require space for other macromolecules such as DNA, which limit the space available for catalytic reaction enzymes. The largest un- structured prokaryotes face the slow scaling of metabolism set by the maximum diffusivity of small molecules in water. For unicellular eukaryotes, transport molecules provide the needed increase in molecular movement and metabolism scales almost linearly with cell volume. At the largest sizes, unicellular eukary- otes reach a sharp decrease dictated by the required overpacking of transport structures to assure the necessary effective diffusivity throughout the cell. Col- lectively, these curves merge to form an overall nonlinear relationship between metabolic rate and size that fit observed data very strongly (Fig. 2) and predict the scaling of protein and other material concentrations and the size at which major transitions in body plans occur. These curves clearly depart from the prediction of a single scaling exponent of 3/4 predicted by the theory for the optimal organization of vascular networks, 7
2403.00001v1.pdf
b6ef04a2-9838-450b-8d04-c6ceb599c316
EukaryotesSmallest Bacteria - Volume Constrained (Densely Packed Macromolecules) -Low DiffusivityMedium Bacteria - Optimal enzyme concentration set by tradeoff between diffusivity and metabolismSmall/Medium Eukaryotes - Optimal transport set by tradeoff between volume for reactions and movementLargest Eukaryotes - Transport mechanisms overpack the cellLarge cell without transport - Saturated diffusion -Enzyme concentration set by thermodynamic shutdown Asymptotic Limits Asymptotic LimitsSuperlinear ScalingSublinear ScalingProkaryotesβ≈0.87—DNA—Ribosomes—Enzymes—Example Transport—Substrates β=1/3β=11/15β>2β≈1.26 Superlinear Scaling10-2010-1710-1410-11Cell Volume(m3)rc=100nmrc=1000nmrc=105nm —Product Substrate transport (e.g. Diffusion)Product transport (e.g.Diffusion)Product transport (e.g. Diffusion)Figure 3: Representations of cells with increasing cell radius filled by cell com- ponents DNA, enzymes, ribosomes, and eventually molecular motors [43]. The scaling regimes and key limitations faced by cells of each category are also in- dicated. 8
2403.00001v1.pdf
554ce090-e5bd-4030-9f19-b2af300b4105
and support the general hypothesis that the smallest forms of life face differ- ent physical constraints, with different accompanying solutions, for maximizing metabolic power. However, the derived mechanisms here tend, as a first approx- imation, to a sublinear scaling not far from 3 /4. For example, the mid range bacteria are predicted to scale like 11 /15 = 0 .73, and the largest eukaryotes scale like ≈.80 as curvature sets in. These scalings for both small life and for organisms with vascular systems occur for very different mechanistic reasons, but are linked by the fundamental need for life to allocate and organize space to achieve sufficiently high rates of molecular displacement. Our results thus support more general arguments for why metabolic scaling should not be either surface area to volume scaling ( β= 2/3) or strictly proportional to volume (isometric, β= 1). Our work suggests that previous analyses of prokaryote metabolic scal- ing with all of the data [16], which found super-linear scaling, requires size- dependent shifts in physical constraints that accompany shifts in scaling to approximate a super-linear power law.Our results demonstrate that the overall super-linear pattern is driven by strong curvature away from a power law at the smallest cell sizes. Downstream extension of the fits using all data have been used to derive other features such as the increase in growth rate with cell size and the total abundance of ribosomes [21, 22]. Such models may gain accuracy and improved resolution in size ranges by incorporating the more complicated metabolic scal- ing derived here. In addition, other cellular constraint perspectives have been proposed for explaining scaling in bacteria such as biosynthetic costs of the membrane [44], ribosome and protein abundances and costs [22, 45], the spatial location and number of organelles and genomes [16, 29], the increasing number of genes and their cost [16, 29, 45, 46], and transporter optimizations associated with the environment (e.g. [23] for a review). In addition, the deployment of phase separation as another means for enhancing reaction rates [47, 48] and the spatial architecture of macromolecules [49, 50] may also be important for cellular scaling.
2403.00001v1.pdf
0dbf697e-1e36-4a25-b669-5c99533f892c
These are all important biophysical, physiological, and evolu- tionary considerations, and it will be important to integrate these additional constraints with cellular scaling in a more complicated optimization approach [23] that combines these costs with the diffusive tradeoffs employed here. Large prokaryotes also deploy active molecular transport and so the two models presented here represent bounding cases where large prokaryotes ( E. coliand bigger) and small unicellular eukaryotes. Multicellular organisms over- come the limit faced by the largest single cells by evolving mechanisms of bulk flow among cells. At its extreme, optimizing such bulk flow through tubular vascular systems to minimize energy dissipation (friction) produces the well- known B∝M3/4[10, 11, 13, 51–53]. Taken together, our results and vascular network models show that, organisms across the tree of life may face univer- sal tradeoffs between biochemical reactions and the space devoted to transport, where larger organisms must employ increasingly energy-requiring methods to increase molecular transport velocities. Our results also predict the scaling of materials within the cell. For small 9
2403.00001v1.pdf
798a60d1-31f8-4959-8522-36176f72d61f
entities relying on diffusion, we predict the total mass of enzymes (protein) to scale as V11/15 c , which closely agrees with observed scaling proportional to V0.70 c[22]. We also predict the minimum size and volume scaling at which cells should produce molecular motors, microtubules and other cytoskeletal material and other mechanisms to enhance diffusivity (Fig. 2). These scaling predictions cannot yet be tested, as they predate the measurement of such volumes or masses for diverse species and cell sizes, with just recently-developed microscopy techniques. However, the largest prokaryotes are known for unusual storage capacity [22, 28], many copies of the genome [29], and surprising amount of cytoskeleton [54]. All of these characteristics may give hints to the eukaryotic transition, and indeed Asgard archaea, which are suggested to be the eukaryotic ancestor, have several atypical cellular morphological characteristics [54–56].Our results suggest that active transport in and/or bulk flow of the cyto- plasm is likely required to generate free energy even in single cell organisms such as larger Prokaryotes and single-cell Eukaryotes. Extrapolation of the required molecular movement in our models further suggests that smaller multicellular organisms may require mechanisms such as contraction of tissues and/or loco- motion to generate bulk transport of intercellular fluids without an organized single source vascular system. Extending further, branching pressurized circu- latory networks may be required to sustain metabolism for organisms >1 g, a hypothesis supported by evidence that smallest mechanical pumping circulatory systems are limited by damping of pulsatile flow [10]. Our results now provide a physical and chemical explanation for the unique metabolic scaling exhibited by the smallest 11 orders of magnitude in organism size. We demonstrate that these life forms face significant design constraints, set by limited space for macromolecules and diffusive molecular movement, and the continuing need for faster molecular displacement mechanisms for the largest unicellulars.
2403.00001v1.pdf
7381c53c-9d32-4543-a586-dabd94da24b5
The predicted scaling relationships as organisms shift across the different transport limitation domains suggest that natural selection has ad- dressed this sequence of problems during the evolution of larger cell body sizes. Such evolution has led to cells with clustered reaction surfaces, channels of cyto- plasm for transporting molecules, molecular motors and cytoskeletal structures to enhance diffusion and then finally by mechanical pumping mechanisms that preview the evolution of powered branched circulatory systems. Our work now extends prior theory to provide a parsimonious hypothesis for how metabolism and the materials that support such activity scale across all life. References [1] J. H. Brown, J. F. Gillooly, A. P. Allen, V. M. Savage, and G. B. West, “Toward a metabolic theory of ecology,” Ecology , vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1771– 1789, 2004. [2] B. Enquist et al. , “Scaling metabolism from organisms to ecosystems,” Nature , vol. 423, pp. 639–642, 2003. 10
2403.00001v1.pdf
75ecd593-b11d-47eb-8ba9-08d6067ab221
[3] M. Kaspari, “Using the metabolic theory of ecology to predict global pat- terns of abundance,” Ecology , vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1800–1802, 2004. [4] M. Ritchie, Scale, heterogeneity, and the structure and diversity of ecological communities . Princeton: Princeton University, 2009. [5] S. Pawar, A. Dell, and V. Savage, “Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths,” Nature , vol. 486, pp. 485–489, 2012. [6] P. Agutter and J. Tuszynski, “Analytic theories of allometric scaling,” Jour- nal of Experimental Biology , vol. 214, no. 7, pp. 1055–1062, 2011. [7] D. Glazier, “A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants,” Biological Reviews , vol. 85, pp. 111–138, 2010. [8] K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: why is animal size so important?[8] K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [9] R. Peters, The ecological implications of body size . Cambridge UK: Cam- bridge University Press, 1986. [10] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology,” Science , vol. 276, no. 5309, pp. 122–126, 1997. [11] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for the struc- ture and allometry of plant vascular systems,” Nature , vol. 400, no. 6745, pp. 664–667, 1999.400, no. 6745, pp. 664–667, 1999. [12] S. Mori, K. Yamaji, A. Ishida, S. G. Prokushkin, O. V. Masyagina, A. Hag- ihara, A. R. Hoque, R. Suwa, A. Osawa, T. Nishizono, et al. , “Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees,” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1447–1451, 2010. [13] J. R. Banavar, J. Damuth, A. Maritan, and A. Rinaldo, “Supply–demand balance and metabolic scaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 99, no. 16, pp. 10506–10509, 2002. [14] J. Banavar et al. , “A general basis for quarter-power scaling in animals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, pp.
2403.00001v1.pdf
f1bfb8b3-19cc-4eb0-a757-19de85d211b4
107, pp. 15816–15820, 2010. [15] J. Maino, M. Kearney, R. Nisbet, and S. Kooijman, “Reconciling theories for metabolic scaling,” Journal of Animal Ecology , vol. 83, pp. 20–29, 2014. [16] J. P. DeLong, J. G. Okie, M. E. Moses, R. M. Sibly, and J. H. Brown, “Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evo- lutionary transitions of life,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences , vol. 107, no. 29, pp. 12941–12945, 2010. 11
2403.00001v1.pdf
9699da9a-1017-49f6-a42e-920e50983b82
[17] D. Glazier, “Metabolic scaling in complex living systems,” Systems , vol. 2, no. 4, p. 451, 2014. [18] T. Kolokotrones, V. Savage, E. Deeds, and W. Fontana, “Curvature in metabolic scaling,” Nature , vol. 464, no. 7289, pp. 753–756, 2010. [19] G. West and J. Brown, “The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization,” Journal of Experimental Biology , vol. 208, pp. 1575–1592, 2005. [20] A. Makarieva et al. , “Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: Evidence for life’s metabolic optimum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 105, pp. 16994–16999, 2008.105, pp. 16994–16999, 2008. [21] C. P. Kempes, S. Dutkiewicz, and M. J. Follows, “Growth, metabolic par- titioning, and the size of microorganisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 495–500, 2012. [22] C. P. Kempes, L. Wang, J. P. Amend, J. Doyle, and T. Hoehler, “Evo- lutionary tradeoffs in cellular composition across diverse bacteria,” The ISME journal , vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2145–2157, 2016. [23] C. P. Kempes, M. Koehl, and G. B. West, “The scales that limit: the phys- ical boundaries of evolution,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , vol. 7, p. 242, 2019. [24] L. Demetrius, “Quantum statistics and allometric scaling of organisms,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , vol.
2403.00001v1.pdf
95044ea7-b5ec-4b3e-a2c7-b553a86ff592
322, pp. 477– 490, 2003. [25] D. S. Banks and C. Fradin, “Anomalous diffusion of proteins due to molec- ular crowding,” Biophysical journal , vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 2960–2971, 2005. [26] F. Roosen-Runge, M. Hennig, F. Zhang, R. M. Jacobs, M. Sztucki, H. Schober, T. Seydel, and F. Schreiber, “Protein self-diffusion in crowded solutions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 108, no. 29, pp. 11815–11820, 2011. [27] A. Bar-Even, E. Noor, Y. Savir, W. Liebermeister, D. Davidi, D. S. Tawfik, and R. Milo, “The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physico- chemical trends shaping enzyme parameters,” Biochemistry , vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 4402–4410, 2011.50, no. 21, pp. 4402–4410, 2011. [28] H. Schulz, T. Brinkhoff, T. G. Ferdelman, M. H. Marin´ e, A. Teske, and B. B. Jørgensen, “Dense populations of a giant sulfur bacterium in namib- ian shelf sediments,” Science , vol. 284, no. 5413, pp. 493–495, 1999. 12
2403.00001v1.pdf
9186ac76-0d9a-4cce-98ec-5110f3cc4010
[29] N. Lane and W. Martin, “The energetics of genome complexity,” Nature , vol. 467, no. 7318, pp. 929–934, 2010. [30] J.-M. Volland, S. Gonzalez-Rizzo, O. Gros, T. Tyml, N. Ivanova, F. Schulz, D. Goudeau, N. H. Elisabeth, N. Nath, D. Udwary, et al. , “A centimeter- long bacterium with dna contained in metabolically active, membrane- bound organelles,” Science , vol. 376, no. 6600, pp. 1453–1458, 2022. [31] K. Luby-Phelps, “Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area,” International review of cytology , vol. 192, pp. 189–221, 1999. [32] S. M. Hurtley, “Cell biology of the cytoskeleton,” 1998.[33] M. Xu, J. L. Ross, L. Valdez, and A. Sen, “Direct single molecule imaging of enhanced enzyme diffusion,” Physical review letters , vol. 123, no. 12, p. 128101, 2019. [34] N. Fakhri, A. D. Wessel, C. Willms, M. Pasquali, D. R. Klopfenstein, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, “High-resolution mapping of intracellular fluctuations using carbon nanotubes,” Science , vol. 344, no. 6187, pp. 1031– 1035, 2014. [35] C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, “Intracellular transport by active diffusion,” Trends in cell biology , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 423–427, 2009.19, no. 9, pp. 423–427, 2009. [36] P. C. Bressloff and J. M. Newby, “Stochastic models of intracellular trans- port,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 85, no. 1, p. 135, 2013. [37] S. S. Mogre, A. I. Brown, and E. F. Koslover, “Getting around the cell: physical transport in the intracellular world,” Physical Biology , vol. 17, no. 6, p. 061003, 2020. [38] Z. Qu, D. Schildknecht, S. Shadkhoo, E. Amaya, J. Jiang, H. J. Lee, D. Lar- ios, F. Yang, R. Phillips, and M. Thomson, “Persistent fluid flows defined by active matter boundaries,” Communications Physics , vol. 4, no. 1, p. 198, 2021.
2403.00001v1.pdf
550acf7d-2e3c-494e-ad2a-b799c990d6b7
4, no. 1, p. 198, 2021. [39] M. J. Bowick, N. Fakhri, M. C. Marchetti, and S. Ramaswamy, “Symme- try, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter,” Physical Review X , vol. 12, no. 1, p. 010501, 2022. [40] M. Guo, A. J. Ehrlicher, M. H. Jensen, M. Renz, J. R. Moore, R. D. Goldman, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, F. C. Mackintosh, and D. A. Weitz, “Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 822–832, 2014. [41] R. Lipowsky, S. Klumpp, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, “Random walks of cytoskeletal motors in open and closed compartments,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 87, no. 10, p.87, no. 10, p. 108101, 2001. 13
2403.00001v1.pdf
fad52d6a-2575-4d70-9715-71f39aee5482
[42] P. Pierobon, M. Mobilia, R. Kouyos, and E. Frey, “Bottleneck-induced transitions in a minimal model for intracellular transport,” Physical Review E, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 031906, 2006. [43] BioRender.com, “Created with biorender.com.” [44] B. Trickovic and M. Lynch, “Resource allocation to cell envelopes and the scaling of bacterial growth rate,” BioRxiv , pp. 2022–01, 2022. [45] M. Lynch and G. K. Marinov, “The bioenergetic costs of a gene,” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 112, no. 51, pp. 15690–15695, 2015. [46] S. Alberti, “Phase separation in biology,” Current Biology , vol. 27, no. 20, pp. R1097–R1102, 2017.20, pp. R1097–R1102, 2017. [47] C. A. Azaldegui, A. G. Vecchiarelli, and J. S. Biteen, “The emergence of phase separation as an organizing principle in bacteria,” Biophysical journal , vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1123–1138, 2021. [48] D. Zwicker, “The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science , p. 101606, 2022. [49] M. Castellana, S. Hsin-Jung Li, and N. S. Wingreen, “Spatial organiza- tion of bacterial transcription and translation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 113, no. 33, pp. 9286–9291, 2016. [50] N. S. Wingreen and K. C. Huang, “Physics of intracellular organization in bacteria,” Annual Review of Microbiology , vol. 69, pp. 361–379, 2015.69, pp. 361–379, 2015. [51] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms,” science , vol. 284, no. 5420, pp. 1677–1679, 1999. [52] V. M. Savage, L. P. Bentley, B. J. Enquist, J. S. Sperry, D. Smith, P. B. Reich, and E. Von Allmen, “Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, no. 52, pp. 22722–22727, 2010. [53] A. B. Brummer, V. M. Savage, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for metabolic scaling in self-similar asymmetric networks,” PLoS computa- tional biology , vol. 13, no. 3, p. e1005394, 2017.
2403.00001v1.pdf
0e0a640e-1e0b-414b-b2fc-001d6f78a4ae
13, no. 3, p. e1005394, 2017. [54] T. Rodrigues-Oliveira, F. Wollweber, R. I. Ponce-Toledo, J. Xu, S. K.-M. Rittmann, A. Klingl, M. Pilhofer, and C. Schleper, “Actin cytoskeleton and complex cell architecture in an asgard archaeon,” Nature , vol. 613, no. 7943, pp. 332–339, 2023. 14
2403.00001v1.pdf
4c77c979-35da-4038-bc9b-79eada745799
[55] B. Avcı, J. Brandt, D. Nachmias, N. Elia, M. Albertsen, T. J. Ettema, A. Schramm, and K. U. Kjeldsen, “Spatial separation of ribosomes and dna in asgard archaeal cells,” The ISME Journal , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 606– 610, 2022. [56] H. Imachi, M. K. Nobu, N. Nakahara, Y. Morono, M. Ogawara, Y. Takaki, Y. Takano, K. Uematsu, T. Ikuta, M. Ito, et al. , “Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface,” Nature , vol. 577, no. 7791, pp. 519– 525, 2020. 2 Supplementary Material 15
2403.00001v1.pdf
a31ef284-41ec-453c-a83e-eda856012431
3 Diffusions Tradeoffs The coupled diffusion equations to be solved for steady state are D(Z) x2A′′(x) + 2xA′(x) x2−kZA(x)! = 0 (10) D(Z) x2P′′(x) + 2xP′(x) x2+kZA(x)! = 0 (11) with the boundary conditions A(rc) = A0 (12) A′(0) = 0 (13) P(rc) = P0.(14) The solution to these equations is A(r) =A0rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) sinh r√ kZ√ D(Z) r(15) Following a similar derivation, the corresponding equation for Pis P(r) =A0+P0−A0rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) sinh r√ kZ√ D(Z) r(16) Returning to the integral which represents the full metabolic rate of the cell, can can use these solutions for AandPset constraints on Z. To avoid thermodynamic shutdown we needKeqA(r) P(r)>1 which, given the solutions above, leads to the condition rcsch r√ kZp D(Z)! <A0(1 +Keq)rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) A0+P0.
2403.00001v1.pdf
78d7ddf6-6bd2-4492-8992-844fe3071d35
(17) Thermodynamic shutdown is a problem for the interior of the cell and so we are interested in checking this condition for r= 0. Evaluating the above inequality atr= 0 and expanding in small rcleads to Z D(Z)<6(A0Keq−P0) A0kr2c(1 +Keq). (18) This equation isn’t fully solved because the diffusivity, D, depends on Z. Previ- ous work has shown that for large enough Zchanges in diffusivity will approx- imately follow a power law [26], and so we can consider D(Z) =D0Zγwhich yields Z <6D0(A0Keq−P0) A0kr2c(1 +Keq)1 1−γ (19) 16
2403.00001v1.pdf
e8b6ec9a-8366-4c9a-a69c-1133e5133761
which for P≈0 is Z <6D0Keq kr2c(1 +Keq)1 1−γ . (20) This equation states how the concentration of enzyme should either concentrate or dilute with cell size to avoid thermodynamic limitations. Given that γ≈ −3/2 [26] we have that Z∝r−4/5 c or Z∝V−4/15 c . (21) It should be noted that given Equation 20, Zis bounded by a concentration that is diluting out as cells increase in size. This should set a hard upper bound where the cellular concentrations start to reach discrete numbers of enzymes. Thus, under a fixed tradeoff for diffusivity an upper bound on cell volume is predicted by the dilution of enzyme concentrations required to avoid thermody- namic shutdown. It should be noted that once Zreaches sufficiently low concentrations diffu- sivity saturates to a maximum value set by molecular motion in the fluid [26].At this point D(Z) =Dmaxand we have Z <6DmaxA0Keq A0kr2c(1 +Keq). (22) In this limit Zwill scale like V−2/3 c to avoid thermodynamic shutdown. Thermodynamic Optimization More generally, we are interested in the concentrations of enzymes that would optimize cellular metabolic rate. The above arguments give us a bounding expectation for the scaling of enzyme concentration, but we can replace these with the complete optimization of cellular metabolic rate, B. Specifically, we are interested in∂B ∂Z= 0. (23) where the total metabolism integrated over a cell is B= 4πRTkZ 1−3Ve(rc) 4πr3cZrc 0r2A(r) logKeqA(r) P(r) dr. (24) Considering cases where the environmental concentration of the product is low, P0≈0, the integrand is given by A0rcrZcsch √ kZrcp D(Z)! sinh √ kZrp D(Z)!
2403.00001v1.pdf
df015ffe-6ce6-468d-852f-89a7a93fdb35
sinh √ kZrp D(Z)! log Keqrc rsinh√ kZrc√ D(Z) csch√ kZr√ D(Z) −rc  (25) 17
2403.00001v1.pdf
b3440c04-fbfe-45b3-8484-f20b235869fb
We approximate this integral considering small rcand with, D(Z) =D0Zγ, the dependence of diffusivity on Z. Given these assumptions integrand is well approximated by A0√ krcr2z3/2csch√ kZrc√D0zγ log Keqrc √ D0Zγsinh √ kZrc√ D0Zγ! √ kZ−rc  √D0Zγ(26) leading to the solution of the integral as B=A0RTk3/2rcZ3/2 4πr3 c−3Ve csch√ kZrc √D0Zγ log Keqrc √ D0Zγsinh √ kZrc√ D0Zγ! √ kZ−rc  3√D0Zγ.(27) In the small radius limit the derivative, ∂B/∂Z , is then well approximated by ∂B ∂Z≈A0RTkV e 1−γ−log6KeqD0zγ−1 kr2c . (28) Setting this to zero leads to Zopt=1 e6KeqD0 kr2c1/(1−γ) . (29) This optimal solution of Zoptcan be substituted back into the approximate solu- tion for total metabolic rate, B, which we find does a good job of approximating the full numerical integral. If we take γ=−3/2 this gives Zopt=62/5K2/5 eqD2/5 0 ek2/5r4/5 c. (30) This solution shows that the optimal Zscales like Z∝r−4/5 c∝V−4/15 c (31) in agreement with our considerations above for thermodynamic shutdown.
2403.00001v1.pdf
a89c8894-1494-470c-8e6f-ffcc18f4fed1
The corresponding solution for metabolic rate is given by B=29/10A0RTk3/5K9/10 eqD2/5 0csch√ 6√ Keq e5/4 4πr3 c−3Ve log K3/2 eq e5/4sinh √ 6√ Keq e5/4! √ 6−√ Keq  10√ 3e9/4r4/5 c (32) which scales like B≈r11/5 c∝V11/15 c (33) 18
2403.00001v1.pdf
9a57cf59-55d6-4b02-b6c5-bc39617c6102
predicting that metabolic rate will scale slightly sublinearly for sufficiently large size. It should be note that this is the approximate scaling of Bover a range of larger cell sizes, but the full form of Bis more complicated a small cells sizes, especially considering the factor of (1 −Ve(rc)/Vc) multiplying the entire scaling where Ve=v0Vα cwith α= 0.83 [22]. Figure 4 shows the full solution of Bwith more strongly superlinear scaling because of the small-size curvature. 10-2010-1910-1810-1710-1610-15012345 Cell Volume(m3)Effective Scaling Exponent(β) Figure 4: The approximation of the local scaling exponent across the range of bacterial volumes. The dashed line is 11 /15 which the complete model converges on for large cell volumes. Saturated Diffusivity It should be noted that at very low Zthe diffusivity saturates to a constant maximum behavior and stops following a power law.In this case diffusivity reaches the maximum molecular diffusivity, D=Dmax, and the above equations lead a optimal enzyme concentration of Zopt=6DmaxKeq ekr2c(34) and corresponding metabolic rate of B=2√ 6A0RTD maxK3/2 eqcschq 6 ep Keq 4πr3 c−3Ve log 1√e 6sinh√ 6 e√ Keq K3/2 eq−1 Keq  e3/2r2c. (35) Here enzyme concentration will scale like Z∝V−2/3 c andB∝V1/3 c. However, these scalings are unlikely to be observed because of the shift to employing active 19
2403.00001v1.pdf
1b4db66b-46cb-4d76-a177-dd27710713d7
transport, and these results are only shown to illustrate the extreme limitation faced by large cells if they only used molecular diffusion. 10-2110-2010-1910-1810-1710-1610-1510-1910-1610-1310-10 Cell Volume(m3)Metabolic Rate(W) Figure 5: Comparison of the model prediction (red curve) with bacterial data (red points) and the binned averages of those data (black points) same data. 4 Active Transport Tradeoffs Our model for active transport treats diffusion in the cell as ∂A ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kcatAZ ∂P ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kcatAZ0 (36) with a modified effective diffusivity, D′, that follows D′= (1−ρ)Dmax+ρDtrans. (37) where ρis the fraction of cell volume occupied by transport structures.(37) where ρis the fraction of cell volume occupied by transport structures. Here we define an effective volume (region with enhanced transport) of a transport structure, and ρis the ratio of the total of these effective volumes to the total cell volume. The optimization of metabolism now depends on tradeoffs between the adjusted diffusivity and the space occupied by the transport structures, where total metabolism follows B= 4πRTkZ (1−ρϵ)Zrc 0r2A(r) logKeqA(r) P(r) dr. (38) where ϵis the ratio of the volume of a transport structure to the effective volume of enhanced transport that structure creates. The solutions for A(r) and P(r) are the same as in Equations 15 and 16. 20
2403.00001v1.pdf
d0f3167f-bfea-4e31-a161-0b8c2fb15728
We are again interested in optimizing cellular metabolic rate, B, where now we are looking for solutions to ∂B ∂ρ= 0. (39) The integration of Bis well approximated by B≈C(1−ρϵ)csch√ kZrc √ ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ) log Keqrc√ kZ√ ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ) sinh√ krc√ Z√ ρDtrans +Dmax (1−ρ) −rc  3p ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ). (40) C≡4πA0RTk3/2r4 cZ3/2(41) for small values of rc. Again we are considering the regime where transport, now represented by the adjusted diffusivity D′, is large relative to the scale of the cell.
2403.00001v1.pdf
c4c8a8b6-5533-48ca-8598-db508c4355e0
Taking the derivative of this this solution and again approximating it for small rcand also for small Dmax(the maximum molecular diffusivity) we have ∂B ∂ρ≈r3 cA0RTkZ 1−ρϵ 1 + log 6Dtrans Keqρ kr2cZ 3ρ= 0. (42) which gives the optimal fraction of transport structures as ρ=1 ϵW 6eDtrans Keq kr2cZϵ (43) where Wis the Lambert Wfunction (the product logarithm). For small rcthis is well approximated by ρ=1 ϵlog 6eDtrans Keq kr2 cZϵ (44) Similar to our solutions above for the enzyme concentration tradeoffs in bacteria, this function again highlights that optimal metabolic values depend onDKeq kr2c.Taking all of this together we have that the optimal metabolic rate follows B=1 3A0RTkr3 cZ 1 + 1 /log6DtransKeq kr2cZϵ log 6DtransKeq kr2cZϵ 1 + log 6Dtrans Keq kr2 cZϵ . (45) This scales like B∝r3 c∝Vcwith a logarithmic correction term. This explains why the scaling of metabolism in Eukaryotes is close to linear with cell volume but actually sublinear due to the logarithmic terms. Figure 6 gives the approx- imate local exponent of Bwith cell size. The full range of Eukaryotes is well approximated by β= 0.90 which agrees with data as discussed in the maintext. 21
2403.00001v1.pdf
9bfd9766-9f32-404c-9238-d44c1f430b49
10-2010-1810-1610-1410-1210-100.50.60.70.80.91.0 Cell Volume(m3)Effective Scaling Exponent(β)Figure 6: The approximation of the local scaling exponent across the range of bacterial volumes. The dashed line is 11 /15 which the complete model converges on for large cell volumes. This function also comes with an asymptotic limit that occurs because trans- portors begin to overpack the cell. This limit occurs when W6eDtransKeq kr2cZϵ = 1 (46) which corresponds to an maximum single cell eukaryote of Vc,max =8√ 6πD3/2 transK3/2 eq k3/2Z3/2ϵ3/2. (47) This solution mirrors the molecular diffusion limit but with an altered diffusivity. 22
2403.00001v1.pdf
84441c0a-a677-4044-97f7-d6051818429a
arXiv:2403.00002v1 [math.DG] 24 Dec 2023Gradient Estimate for Fisher-KPP Equation on Finsler metric measure spaces Bin Shen and Dingli Xia Abstract In this manuscript, we study the positive solutions of the Fi nslerian Fisher-KPP equation ut= ∆∇uu+cu(1−u). The Fisher-KPP equation is widely applied and connected tom any mathematical branches. We establish the global gradient estimates on com pact Finsler metric measure manifold with the traditional CD(K,N)condition, which is developed by S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm in Finsler geometry. Furthermore, With the assis- tance of a new comparison theorem developed by the first autho r, we also give the gradient estimate on forward complete noncompact local ly finite misalign- ment Finsler metric measure spaces with the mixed weighted c urvature bounded below and some non-Riemannian curvatures norm-bounded.Keywords: gradient estimate, Fisher-KPP equation, Finsler metric me asure space, weighted Ricci curvature, mixed weighted Ricci curvature MSC Classification: 35K55 , 53C60 , 58J35 1 Introduction . The Fisher-KPP equation on a complete Riemannian manifold Mis given by ut= ∆u+cu(1−u), (1.1) whereuis a real-valued function on M×[0,∞) andcis a positive constant. The equation was proposed by R. A. Fisher in 1937 to describe the pr opagation of an evolutionarily advantageous gene in a population, and was also in dependently describedinaseminalpaperbyA.N.Kolmogorov,I.G.Petrovskii,a ndN.S.Piskunov in the same year; for this reason, it is often referred to in the litera ture as the name of Fisher–KPP equation. 1
2403.00002v1.pdf
d3c78856-0260-4177-89f7-d0e67eb0af91
Since the two papers in 1937, there have been extensive investigat ions on travel- ing wave solutions and asymptotic behavior in terms of spreading spe eds for various evolution systems. Traveling waves were adopted to study the non linear PDEs, such as the nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations modeling physical and biological phenomena (cf. [ 22][23]), the integral and integrodifferential population models (cf. [2][7][15][16][30]), the lattice differential systems (cf. [ 6][11][12][14][21][40]), and the time-delayed reaction-diffusion equations (cf. [ 29][38]). In 2017, Cao et al. [ 10] derived differential Harnack estimates for positive solutions to (1.1) on Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature. The idea comes from [8][9], in which a systematic method was developed to find a Harnack inequa lity for geometric evolution equations.Actually, they obtained the follo wing theorem. Theorem A. [10]Let(M,g)be ann-dimensional complete noncompact Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature, and let u(x,t) :M×[0,∞)→Rbe a positive solution to ( 1.1), where uisC2inxandC1int. letf=logu, then we have ∆f+α|∇f|2+βef+φ(t)≥0.
2403.00002v1.pdf
eb19430e-f9ba-4953-897a-0381fe16b3e2
(1.2) for all xandt, provided that 0< α < 1as well as−cn(2+√ 2) 4(1−α)< β <min{−cn(1+α) 4α2−4α+2n,−cn(2−√ 2) 4(1−α)}<0, where φ(t) =u(e2µwt v−w−1 µ+w) 1−e2µwt,withµ= βc√ 2(1−α) c(−cn−8β(1−α)), v=( 4β(1−α) n+c) ·√ 2(1−α) c(−cn−8β(1−α))andw=√ 2(1−α) n. Utilizing Theorem A, one can integrate along space-time curves to ge t a Harnack inequality. However, it is different from the classical Li–Yau Harnack inequality [ 20] in form. Gradient estimates play an important role in studying elliptic an d parabolic operators.Gradient estimates play an important role in studying elliptic an d parabolic operators. The method originated first in [ 44] and [13], and was further developed by Li and Yau [ 20], Li [19], Negrin [ 24], P. Souplet and Q. Zhang [ 37], Y. Yang [ 43], etc.. Recent gradient estimates under the geometric flow include [ 4] and [3]. For more results on the nonlinear PDEs, one may refer to [ 1][18]. In 2018,following the line in [ 19], X. Geng and S. Hou [ 17] provedthe positive solu- tions to the Fisher–KPP equation on complete Riemannian manifolds. T hey derived a gradient estimate, and got the classic Harnack inequality by using it, which extended the recent result of Cao, Liu, Pendleton and Ward [ 10].In2009,uponthefoundationalinvestigationsofgradientestimat iononRiemannian manifolds, S. Ohtainitially put forwardasophisticatedframeworkfo r gradientestima- tion applicable to the heat equation on compact Finsler manifolds [ 25]. Subsequently, in the year2014,C.Xia [ 41]undertookacomprehensiveanalysisofharmonicfunctions within the context of both compact and non-compact (specifically, forward complete) Finsler structures by utilizing an advanced form of Moser’s iterative technique. Pro- gressingfurther,Q.Xia[ 42] deliveredintricategradientestimatesforpositivesolutions to the heat equation on forward complete Finsler spaces, employing methodologies analogous to those documented in [ 41]. The first author [ 32] proposed a method for global and local gradient estimates on Finsler metric measure space s, which was also used to solve the Finslerian Schr¨ odinger equation.Later, the firs t author [ 31] gives the gradient estimates of bounded solutions to the Finslerian Allen-Cahn equation. 2
2403.00002v1.pdf
7852a098-638a-4ed5-818d-3d7732d96791
In this paper, we study the Fisher-KPP equation ( 1.1) on a Finsler metric measure manifold ( M,F,µ), where cis a positive constant, the solution of ( 1.1) is a function u(x) onM×[0,∞). Our main theorems in this paper are as follows Theorem 1.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a compact Finsler metric measure space with dimen- sionaln≥2, whose weighted Ricci curvature satisfies RicN≥ −K, for some positive constant K. Assume the reversibility of Mhas upper bound ρ0. Suppose uis a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP parabolic equat ion (1.1) onM×[0,∞), then we have F2(∇u) u2+2c(1−u)−2ut u≤2(N+n)ρ2 0K+27√ 2(N+n)3 2M1c.(1.3) where,M1= supu(x,t).(1.3) where,M1= supu(x,t). Similarily, on a noncompact forward complete Finsler manifold, the follo wing local gradient estimates is obtained. Theorem 1.2. Let(M,F,µ)be a complete noncompact Finsler metric measure space. Denote by B(p,2R)the forward geodesic ball centered at pwith forward radius 2 R. Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRicN≥ −K(2R)inB(p,2R)with K(2R)≥0, and the misalignment αsatisfies α≤A(2R)inB(p,2R). Moreover, the non-Riemannian tensors satisfy F(U)+F∗(T)+F(divC(V))≤K0.Assume u(x,t) is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP para bolic equation ( 1.1) on M×[0,∞), then we have F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u≤C1(N,n,ǫ)(s2 t+s2K(2R) (s−1)+sc qM1) +C2(N,n,ǫ,A (2R))s2 R2{ 1+R[ 1+√ K(2R)] +s2 s−1} .(1.4) onB(p,R)for0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, whereC1,C2are positive constants. 2 Preliminary . In this section, we introduce the fundamental principles governing Finsler metric measure spaces (refer to [ 32] for more details).
2403.00002v1.pdf
45fdda5d-6b8e-45c2-8308-be68ab4b53b7
A Finsler metric space is a triple (M,F,µ), which indicatesthatadifferentialmanifold isequipped with aFinslerm etric Fand a measure µ. Suppose the local coordinate of the tangent bundle is ( x,y), where xis the point on Mandyis the direction on TxM. A Finsler metric Fis a nonnegative function F:TM→[0,+∞) satisfies that (i)Fis smooth and positive on TM\{0}; (ii)Fis a positive homogenousnorm, i.e., F(x,ky) =kF(x,y) for any ( x,y)∈TM and for any k >0; 3
2403.00002v1.pdf
026e82b5-38a4-434d-a069-00c59bb78a11
(iii)Fis strongly pseudo-convex, namely, for any ( x,y)∈TM\ {0}, the fundamental tensor is a positive definite matrix defined by gij(x,y) :=1 2∂F2 ∂yi∂yj(x,y). (2.1) Unlike the Riemann metric, the Finsler metric is defined locally as the nor m on the tangent space at each point, and globally as a metric on the pull-b ack bundle, so there are a large number of non-Riemannian geometric quantities on a Finsler metric measure space. The Cartan tensor is defined by C(X,Y,Z) :=CijkXiYjZk=1 4∂3F2(x,y) ∂yi∂yj∂ykXiYjZk, (2.2) for any local vector fields X,Y,Z. There is a unique almost g-compatible and torsion-freeconnection o n the pull-back tangent bundle π∗TMof the Finsler manifold ( M,F) called the Chern connection.It is determined by ∇XY−∇YX= [X,Y]; (2.3) w(gy(X,Y))−gy(∇ZX,Y)−gy(X,∇ZY) = 2Cy(∇Zy,X,Y),(2.4) for anyX,Y,Z∈TM\ {0}, whereCyis the Cartan tensor. The Chern connection coefficients are locally denoted by Γi jk(x,y) in a natural coordinate system, which could induce the spray coefficients as Gi=1 2Γi jkyjyk. The spray is given by G=yiδ δxi−2Gi∂ ∂yi, (2.5) in whichδ δxi=∂ δxi−Nj i∂ ∂yjand the nonlinear connection coefficients are locally induced from the spray coefficients by Ni j=∂Gi ∂yj.
2403.00002v1.pdf
0ac89247-3730-441d-9c35-98f3ef7bd532
The Chern connection can define the Chern Riemannian curvature Rand Chern non-Riemannian connection P. Denote by Ω the curvature form of the Chern connection, so that Ω(X,Y)Z=R(X,Y)Z+P(X,∇Yy,Z), (2.6) for anyX,Y,Z∈TM\{0}, where locally Ri j kl=δΓi jl δxk+δΓi jk δxl+Γi kmΓm jl−Γi lmΓm jk, Pi j kl=−∂Γi jk ∂yl. (2.7) Customarily, we denote the horizontalChern derivativeby ” |” and the verticalChern derivative by ”;”. For example, vi|j=δ δxjvi−Γk ijvk, vi;j=∂ ∂yjvi, (2.8) 4
2403.00002v1.pdf
4719d2fe-00c0-46d0-87d1-e14f02f0f938
for any 1-form v=vidxion the pull-back bundle. The angular metric form hyis defined by hy(u,v) =gy(u,v)−1 F2(y)gy(y,u)gy(y,v), (2.9) for anyy,u,v∈TxMwithy̸= 0 Thus, for any two linearly independent vectors y,v∈TxM\ {0}, which span a tangent plane Π y=span{y,v}, the flag curvature with pole yis defined by K(P,y) =K(y,x) :=Ry(y,u,u,y) F2(y)hy(u,u), (2.10) which is locally expressed by K(y,u) =−Rijklyiujykul (gikgjl−gilgjk)yiujykul.(2.11) The Ricci curvature is defined by Ric(v) :=F2(v)n−1∑ i=1K(y,ei), (2.12) wheree1,...,e n−1,v F(v)form an orthonormal basis of TxMwith respect to gy. The Landsberg curvature of ( M,F) is given by L:=Li jk∂i⊗dxj⊗dxk, Li jk=−yjPi j kl. (2.13) By the zero homogeneity, according to the Euler lemma, it easy to se e that Cijkyi=Lijkyi= 0 (2.14) H.B. Rademacher introduced the concepts of reversibility and reve rsible manifolds [28], which are also closely related to the analytical assumptions on Finsle r manifolds.
2403.00002v1.pdf
4e02d8ac-5db1-4c14-851b-8b82b49e528f
A Finsler metric is defined to be reversible if F(x,V) =¯F(x,V) for any point xand any vector field V, where¯F(x,V) :=F(x,−V) is called the reversed Finsler metric of F. ρ:=sup x∈Msup V̸=0F(x,V) F(x,V). (2.15) Obviously, Fis reversible if and only if ρ≡1. A Finsler manifold ( M,F) is said to have finite reversibility if ρ <+∞. Later, K. Ball, E. Carlen, and E. Lieb introduced the concepts of un iform smooth- ness and uniform convexityin Banachspace theory[ 5], whose geometricinterpretation in Finsler geometry was provided by S. Ohta [ 26]. We say Fsatisfies uniform convex- ity and uniform smoothness if there exist uniform positive constant sκ∗andκ, called 5
2403.00002v1.pdf
49f94444-dce0-484f-8d3e-e81dc26ea682
the uniform convexity constant and the uniform smoothness cons tant, respectively, such that for any x∈M,V∈TxM\{0}, andW∈TxM, we have κ∗F2(x,y)≤gV(y,y)≤κF2(x,y). (2.16) wheregV= (gij(x,V)) is the Riemannian metric on Minduced from Fwith respect to the reference vector V. In this situation, the reversibility ρcould be controlled by κandκ∗as 1≤ρ≤min{√κ.√ 1/κ∗}. (2.17) Fis Riemannian if and only if κ= 1 if and only if κ∗= 1 [26]. The Riemannian structure is inconsistent when the reference vect ors are different. For example, given three different local non-vanishing vector fields aroundx, namely, V,W,Y, the norm of YaboutgVandgWmaybe not the same in general case.The ratiogV(Y,Y) =gW(Y,Y) is a function about V,W,Y. Based on this fact, [ 32] defined an important constant on a Finsler manifold, called the misalign ment. Definition 2.1. ([32]). For a Finsler manifold (M,F), the misalignment of a Finsler metric at point xis defined by α(x) =sup V,W,Y∈SxMgV(Y,Y) gW(Y,Y). (2.18) Moreover, the global misalignment of the Finsler metric is d efined by α=sup X∈MαM(x) =sup X∈Msup V,W,Y∈SxMgV(Y,Y) gW(Y,Y). (2.19) it also provided in [ 32] some characterizations of the misalignment. Especially, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is a Riemannian manifold if and only if αM= 1.Moreover, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is uniform convexity and uniform smoothness if and only if it satisfies finite misalignment. Since that, we have gaven an important class of Finsler manifold as th e following. Definition 2.2. We call a Finsler manifold (M,F)has finite misalignment if there is a positive constant Asuch that α≤A, and has locally finite misalignment if for any compact subset Ω⊂M, there is a constant A(Ω)depending on Ωsuch that α(x)≤A(ω)for anyx∈Ω. So far, we have briefly introduced some Riemannian or non-Riemannia n local quantities and tensors in Finsler geometry corresponding to Rieman nian geometric quantities. Next, we will introduce more tensors related to the mea suredµ.
2403.00002v1.pdf
f481315d-cd10-4e50-ad31-91223da2cb75
Next, we will introduce more tensors related to the mea suredµ. For any smooth function f:M→R, df denotes its differential 1-form and its gradient ∇fis defined as the dual of the 1-form via the Legendre transformat ion, namely,∇f(x) :=l−1(df(x))∈TxM. Locally it can be written as ∇f=gij(x.∇f)∂f ∂xi∂ ∂xj. (2.20) onMf:=df̸= 0. The Hessian of fis defined via the Chern connection by 6
2403.00002v1.pdf
d882fddf-5f39-48ad-a402-8775093431be
∇2f(X,Y) =g∇f(∇∇f X∇f,Y). (2.21) It can be shown that ∇2f(X,Y) is symmetric [ 27]. For any two points p,qonM, the distance function is defined by dp(q) :=d(p,q) := inf γ∫1 0F(γ(t),˙γ(t))dt. (2.22) where the infimum is taken overall the C1curvesγ: [0,1]→Msuch that γ(0) =p andγ(1) =q. Fixed a base point ponM, we denote the forward distance function by r. That is, r(x) =d(p,x), with d denotes the forward distance. The forward distance function ris a function defined on the Finsler manifold M. dris a 1-form on M, whose dual is a gradient vector field, noted by ∇r.Precisely, ∇r=gij(x,∇r)∂r ∂xi∂ ∂xjTakingtheChernhorizontalderivativeof ∇ryieldstheHessian of distance function ∇2r. Locally, in a natural coordinate system ∇2r(∂ ∂xi,∂ ∂xj) =∇j∇ir=∂2r ∂xi∂xj−Γk ij(x,∇r)∂r ∂xk. (2.23) In (2.23), the derivative is taken in the direction ∇rnaturally. Generally, we can take the derivative in any direction. Suppose Vis a local vector field around xonM. Note that the distance function may not be symmetric about pandqunlessFis reversible. AC2curveγis called a geodesic if locally ¨γ(t)+2Gi(γ(t),˙γ(t)) = 0. (2.24) whereGi(x,y) are the spray coefficients.
2403.00002v1.pdf
5bf8072a-1ff8-4f7d-9de7-90b5caf83a87
A forward geodesic ball centered at p with radius Rcan be represented by B+ R(p) :={q∈M:d(p,q)< R} (2.25) Adopting the exponential map, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is said to be forward complete or forward geodesically complete if the exponential map is d efined on the entireTM. Thus, any two points in a forward complete manifold Mcan be connected by a minimal forwardgeodesic. Moreover,the forwardclosed balls B+ R(p) are compact. A Finsler metric measure space ( M,F,dµ) is a Finsler manifold equipped with a given measure µ. In local coordinates {xi}n i=1, we can express the volume form as dµ=σ(x)dx1...dxn. For any y∈TxM\{0}, define τ(x,y) :=log√ detgij(x,y) σ(x). (2.26) which is called the distortion of ( M,F,dµ). The definition of the S-curvature is given in the following.The definition of the S-curvature is given in the following. Definition 2.3. ([35][34]). Suppose (M,F,dµ)is a Finsler metric measure space. For any point x∈M, letγ=γ(t)be a forward geodesic from x with the initial tangent vector˙γ(0) =y. The S-curvature of (M,F,dµ)is S(x,y) :=d dtτ=d dt(1 2logdet(gij)−logσ(x))(γ(t),˙γ(t))|t=0.(2.27) 7
2403.00002v1.pdf
29225659-1d05-40cc-937a-c0b0fedbb585
Definition 2.3means that the S-curvature is the changing of distortion alo ng the geodesic in direction y. Modeled on the definition of Tcurvature in [ 36], [32] defined the difference of ∇τon the tangent sphere, denoted by T, Definition 2.4. ([32]). The difference of ∇τon the tangent bundle is a tensor denoted byT, which is given by T(V,W) :=∇Vτ(V)−∇Wτ(W). (2.28) for vector fields V,WonM. Locally, it is T(V,W) =Ti(V,w)dxi, with Ti=δ δxiτk(V)−δ δxiτk(W). (2.29) Obviously, T(V,W) is anti-symmetric about VandW, that is, T(V,W) = −T(W,V) for any nonvanishing VandW.If in local coordinates {xi}n i=1, expressing dµ=eφdx1...dxn, the divergence of a smooth vector field Vcan be written as divdµV=n∑ i=1(∂Vi ∂xi+Vi∂φ ∂xi). (2.30) The Finsler Laplacian of a function fonMcould now be given by ∆ dµf:= divdµ(∇f), noticing that ∆ dµ= ∆∇ff, where ∆∇f dµf:=divdµ(∇∇ff) is in the view of weighted Laplacian with ∇∇ff:={ gij(x,∇f)∂f ∂xi∂ ∂xjfor x∈Mf; 0 for x /∈Mf.(2.31) A Finsler Laplacian is better to be viewed in a weak sense due to the lack of regularity.
2403.00002v1.pdf
b14e9081-b0a3-4f3a-a35c-e8a416f9ba1d
Concretely, assuming f∈W1,p(M), ∫ Mφ∆dµfdµ=−∫ Mdφ(∇f)dµ, (2.32) for any test function φ∈C∞ 0(M). On the other hand, the Laplacian of a function fon a Riemannian manifold is the trace of the Hessian of fwith respect to the Riemannian metric g. On a Finsler metric measure space ( M,F,dµ), the weighted Hessian ˜H(f) of a function fonMf= {x∈M:∇f|x̸= 0}is defined in [ 39] by ˜H(f)(X,Y) =∇2f(X,Y)−S(∇f) n−1h∇f(X,Y), (2.33) whereh∇fis the angular metric form in the direction ∇f, given in ( 2.9) It is clear that˜H(f) is still a symmetric bilinear form with ∆f=tr∇f˜H(f).(2.34) 8
2403.00002v1.pdf
913581dd-02ea-4be7-8f6d-bc86d24fdf90
Inspired by this, [ 32] defined the mixed weighted Hessian ˜HV(f)(X,Y) =∇2(f)(X,X)−S(∇f) n−1hV,∇f(X,X), (2.35) wherehV,∇fis the mixed angular metric form in the directions Vand∇f, which is defined by hV,∇f(X,Y) =gV(X,Y)−1 F2 V(∇f)gV(X,∇f)gV(Y,∇f),(2.36) for any vector X,Y. It is necessary to remark that h∇f,∇f=h∇f, so that ˜H∇f(f) =˜H(f) for any function fonM. With the assistance of the S-curvature, one can present the defi nition of the weighted Ricci curvature as the following. Definition 2.5. ([27][34]).Definition 2.5. ([27][34]). Given a unit vector V∈TxMand an positive integral numberk, the weighted Ricci curvature is defined by Rick(V) :=  Ric(x,V)+˙S(x,V) if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞ −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n Ric(x,V)+˙S(x,V)−S2(x,V) k−nif n < k < ∞ (2.37) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V. AccordingtothedefinitionofweightedRiccicurvature,B.Wudefin edtheweighted flag curvature when k=N∈(1,n)∪(n,∞) in [39]. We have completely introduced this concept for any kin [32]. Definition 2.6. ([32]).
2403.00002v1.pdf
c29d870e-a598-4746-bdfc-87fc5a039804
Definition 2.6. ([32]). Let(M,F,dµ)be a Finsler metric measure space, and V,W∈ TxMbe linearly independent vectors. The weighted flag curvatur eKk(V,W)is defined by Kk(V,W) :=  K(V;W)+˙S(V) (n−1)F2(V)if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞; −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n; K(V;W)+˙S(V) (n−1)F2(V)−S2(V) (n−1)(k−n)F2(V)if n < k < ∞, (2.38) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V. Moreover, it has also been defined the mixed weighted Ricci curvatu re in [32], denoted bymRick. 9
2403.00002v1.pdf
dbd4e6b2-0851-4ea9-897e-c398c65caee4
Definition 2.7. ([32])Given two unit vectors V,W∈TxMand an positive integral numberk, the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRick(V,W) =mRick W(V)is defined by mRick W(V) :=  trWRV(V)+˙S(x,V)if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞; −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n; trWRV(V)+˙S(x,V)−S2(V) k−nif n < k < ∞, (2.39) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V, andtrWRV(V) =gij(W)gV(RV(ei,V)V,ej)means taking trace of the flag curvature with respect to g(x,W). Remark 2.1.Remark 2.1. The weighted Ricci curvature is a special case of the mixed we ighted Ricci curvature, i.e., Rick(V) =mRick V(V). Defining the function ctc(r)as ctc(r) =  √ccot√cr, c > 0, 1/r, c = 0,√−ccoth√−cr c <0.(2.40) the following weighted Hessian comparison theorem is cited from Theorem 3.3 in [ 39]. Theorem 2.1. ([32]).
2403.00002v1.pdf
7d51f15c-fb9c-44d0-9f54-5275c858bdd9
Theorem 2.1. ([32]). Let(M,F,dµ)be a forward complete n-dimensional Finsler metric measure space with finite misalignment α. Denote the forward distance function byrand byVa fixed vector field on M. Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvature RicN(V,∇r)ofMis bounded from below by −KwithK >0, for some N > n, as well as the non-Riemannian curvatures U,TanddivC(V) =Cij k|i(V)Vkδ δxjsatisfy the norm bounds by F(U)+F(T)+F∗(divC(V))≤K0. Then, by setting l=K/C(N,α) withC(N,α) =N+(α−1)n−α, wherever risC2, the nonlinear Laplacian of rwith reference vector Vsatisfies ∆Vr≤C(N,α)ctl(r)+√αK0. (2.41) 3 Global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifolds .(2.41) 3 Global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifolds . Inthissection,wewillfocusontheglobalgradientestimatesofpos itivesolutionsto the Fisher-KPP equation ( 1.1) on compact Finsler manifolds, with the weighted Ricci curvature bounded from below. This condition of curvature is exte nsively employed within the realm of Finsler geometric analysis. Supposethat uisapositivesolutionon M×[0,∞)totheFisher-KPPequation( 1.1) . We define the function W(x,t) =u−q, whereqis a positive constant to be fixed later. We now have the following lemma. 10
2403.00002v1.pdf
3e89f6be-c94e-49d9-b4aa-f48a02518103
Lemma 3.1. Letube a positive solution on M×[0,∞)to the Fisher-KPP equation (1.1) andW(x,t) =u−q, thenWsatisfies that (∆∇u−∂t)W=q+1 qF2(∇W) W+cqW−cqWq−1 q. (3.1) Proof.The gradient of Wwith respect to ∇uis the dual of d Wby the pull-back metricg∇u. Precisely, ∇W=−qu−q−1∇uonMandWt=−qu−q−1ut, so we have F2 ∇u(∇W) =q2u−2q−2F2 ∇u(∇u). (3.2) tr∇u(∇∇u)2W=q(q+1)u−q−2F2 ∇u(∇u)−qu−q−1tr∇u(∇∇u)2u.(3.3) Wt W=−qut u. (3.4) Then we deduce that in the distributional sense on Mu, ∆∇uW=divµ(∇∇uW) =e−φ∂ ∂xi(eφgijWi) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2W−S(∇W) =q(q+1)u−q−2F2 ∇u(∇u)−qu−q−1∆∇uu.(3.5) wherever ∇u̸= 0 Combine with ( 1.1) and (3.2), we have ∆∇uW=q+1 qF2 ∇u(∇W) W−qu−q−1[ut−cu(1−u)] =q+1 qF2 ∇u(∇W) W+Wt+cqW−cqWq−1 q.(3.6) After the transformation, we obtain the Lemma 3.1. Now, we follow the line in [ 19].
2403.00002v1.pdf
4ab11559-7232-4b44-982d-a34ea14fb349
Now, we follow the line in [ 19]. Define three functions as the follow.   H0(x,t) =F2 ∇u(∇W) W2+ac(1−W−1 q), H1=Wt W, H=H0+βH1,(3.7) wherea,βare two positive constants to be determined later. Direct calculatio ns provide that ∇∇uH0=∇∇uF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)∇∇uW W3+ac qW−q+1 q∇∇uW,(3.8) 11
2403.00002v1.pdf
31e272d3-c4aa-4c7f-951c-e92f357c3b34
and tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0=2 W2[dW(∇∇u(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W))+Ric(∇∇uW)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW)+6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 −2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)tr∇u(∇∇u)2W W3−ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) +ac qW−q+1 qtr∇u(∇∇u)2W, (3.9) onMu, where we have employed the Ricci-type identity in [ 33].On the other hand, it satisfies that ∇∇u(S(∇∇uW)) =˙S(∇∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW),(3.10) and ∇∇u(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W) =∇∇u(∆∇uW)+˙S(∇∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW). (3.11) Plugging ( 3.10) and (3.11) into (3.9) yields tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0=2 W2[dW(∇∇u(∆∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,
2403.00002v1.pdf
ce967fc3-c09e-4a51-ae5a-41e436107fcd
∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW) +˙S(∇∇uW)+Ric(∇∇uW)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] +6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW)) W3 −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) −ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)+ac qW−q+1 q(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW)), (3.12) wherever ∇u̸= 0.(3.12) wherever ∇u̸= 0. By a basic computation of Finsler geometry, we could get ∆∇uH0=divµ(∇∇H0) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0−dτ(∇∇uH0)+2C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0),(3.13) where we have already employed the fact that C(∇u,·,·) = 0 and C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0) = uk |iCij k(∇u)Hj. The notation “ |” denotes the horizontal derivative with respect to the 12
2403.00002v1.pdf
1bff5c80-4c35-4a74-97a4-72c7ccbf2bcd
Chern connection in the direction ∇u. It follows from C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0) =uk |iCij k(∇u)[2WlWl|j−2F2(∇W)W−3Wj+1 qacW−q+1 qWj] =2uk |i W2[(Cij kWj)|lWl−Cij k|lWjWl] =−2uk |i W2Lij kWj =0,(3.14) that (3.13) is equal to ∆∇uH0=divµ(∇∇uH0) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0−dτ(∇∇uH0). (3.15) Combining it with ( 3.12), we could find that ∆∇uH0=2 W2[g∇u(∇∇u(∆∇uW),∇∇uW)+Ric∞(∇W)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW)−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)(∆∇uW) W3 +6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)+ac qW−q+1 q∆∇uW, (3.16) by noticing that dτ(∇∇uH) = 2dτ[g∇u((∇∇u)2W,
2403.00002v1.pdf
041f292f-23f0-4668-9a5c-5fa259d6e9c5
∇∇uW) W2−F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3∇∇uW+ac 2qW−q+1 q∇∇uW]. Therefore, H0(x,t) satisfies that ∂H0(x,t) ∂t=∂tF2 ∇u(∇W) W2−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)Wt W3+ac qW−q+1 qWt. (3.17) Because of ∇Wt= (∇W)t, it follows for ∇∇uH1that ∇∇uH1=∇(Wt W) =∇Wt W−Wt∇W W2. (3.18) It asserts by direct caiculation that ∂ ∂t(∆∇uW) = ∆∇uWt, (3.19) 13
2403.00002v1.pdf
5411f350-f8a5-49f0-951f-146bcf563063
arccording to [ 32]. Thus, for H1, one may find that ∆∇uH1=W(∆∇uW)t−2(∇∇uW)t∇∇uW−∆∇uWWt W2+2WtF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3, (3.20) so that ( ∆∇u−∂t) H1=2 qg∇u(∇∇uH1,∇∇ulogW)+cW−1 q−1Wt.(3.21) Moreover, one could calculate that 2 W2g∇u(∇∇u(∆∇uW),∇∇uW)−1 W2∂tF2(∇W) =4(q+1) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3 +2cF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2[q−(q−1)W−1 q]−2(q+1) qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4,(3.22) −2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3(∆∇u−∂t)W=−2(q+1) qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−2cqF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2 +2cqW−1 qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2, (3.
2403.00002v1.pdf
ea2453bf-4ea1-441b-8b9f-5495a47cd327
(3.23) as well as ac qW−q+1 q(∆∇u−∂t)W=ac(q+1) q2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q+ac2W−1 q−ac2W−2 q, (3.24) Plugging ( 3.22)-(3.24) into (3.16) and (3.17) yields ( ∆∇u−∂t) H0=4(1−q) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2q−2 qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +2∥(∇∇u)2W∥2 HS(∇u) W2+ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 +2cW−1 qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.25) It asserts from the h¨ older inequality that 2g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3≤ε∥(∇∇u)2W∥2 HS(∇u) W2+1 εF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4.(3.26) 14
2403.00002v1.pdf
7545a325-e5e2-487e-a949-50829607c105
Thus, when 0 < ε <1, it satisfies that 4(1−q) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2+2(q−2) qF4 ∇u(∇W) W4 ≥4 qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2(1−ε)(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2 +2(1−1 ε−2 q)F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4.(3.27) According to the equality(a+b)2 n=a2 N−b2 N−n+N(N−n) n(a N+b N−b)2, for any N > n, the following inequality holds by substituting a,bandNby ∆∇uW,˙S(∇∇uW) and N−ε(N−n), respectively. Namely, (∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)≥(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W)2 n=(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW))2 n ≥(∆∇uW)2 N−ε(N−n)−(S(∇∇uW))2 (1−ε)(N−n),(3.
2403.00002v1.pdf
25f64273-3e14-47f0-8d36-6b61bd45d44c
(3.28) so that 2(1−ε)(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 ≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2−2S((∇∇uW))2 (N−n)W2+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 ≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2.(3.29) Moreover, it’s easy to infer that g∇u(∇∇uH0,∇∇ulogW) =2g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3−2F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +acW−1 q qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.30) It is deduced from ( 3.25) by combining ( 3.27)-(3.30) and employing the definition of weighted Ricci curvature that 15
2403.00002v1.pdf
7d960852-38e9-48fa-9ae5-2f4dcde9f02f
( ∆∇u−∂t) H0≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH0,∇∇ulogW) +2( 1−1 ε)F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4 +ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+2cF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q( 1−a q2) ,(3.31) onMu.
2403.00002v1.pdf
6f895c6b-52a0-4b95-a674-7f73fd5158d4
Letβ=a q, combining with ( 3.21), we have ( ∆∇u−∂t) H≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2−2(1 ε−1)F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH,∇∇ulogW) +2c( 1−a q2)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+ac qW1 q−1Wt+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2.(3.32) Noticing∆∇uW W=q aH+(q+1 q−q a)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2, and setting a=sq2, we get that ∆∇uW W=1 sqH+(q+1 q−1 sq)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2=1 sqH+(q+1−1 s q)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.33) Plugging it into ( 3.32), we arrive at the following lemma. Lemma 3.2. Let(M,F,µ)be a forward complete Finsler metric measure space, and denoteMu={x∈M| ∇u(x)̸= 0}. ForH=F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2+ac(1−W−1 q)+βWt Wwith a=sq2,β=a q,β=a q, it satisfies on Muthat ( ∆∇u−∂t) H≥[2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(sq+s−1)2 s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2HF2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH,∇∇ulogW) +(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +cW−1 qH+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2. (3.34) 16
2403.00002v1.pdf
89673594-1fe8-483a-939b-a35b03918139
Employing Lemma 3.2, the following global gradient estimate theorem could be obtained by utilizing the maximum principle argument, which was first ad opted in [27] and was applied also in [ 32][31]. Theorem 3.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a compact Finsler metric measure manifold whose weighted Ricci curvature satisfies RicN≥ −K, for some positive constant K. Assume the bound of the reversibility on Misρ0. Suppose u(x,t)is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP parabolic equation ( 1.1) onM×[0,∞), then we have F2(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u≤[N−ε(N−n)] 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K+√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s qM1c.(3.35) where,0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1 +(2s−1)2 8, and M1= supu(x,t). Proof.Lemma3.2implies that ( 3.34) holds in the distributional sense on M. For any nonnegative test function ϕ, we have −∫T 0∫ M[dϕ(∇H)−ϕtH]dµdt≥∫T 0∫ Mϕβdµdt. (3.36) whereβdenotes the RHS of ( 3.34). Assumey0= (x0,t0)∈B(p,2R)×[0,∞) be the point where Hachieves its maxi- mum. Without loss of generality, we could assume H(x0,t0)≥0, otherwise the result will be satisfied trivially. We claim that β(x0,t0)≤0.
2403.00002v1.pdf
69552c65-7f97-416c-b0d8-10f9c9cc58c1
We claim that β(x0,t0)≤0. Otherwise, βis strictly positive at ( x0,t0), so that β(x0,t0) is positive in a small neighborhood of ( x0,t0) onM, which may be denoted by U. Chosen a test function ϕ whose compact support Vis contained in U, we know from ( 3.36) thatHis a weak, local subharmonic function in a neighborhood V⊂U.It is a contradiction because (x0,t0) is a inner point of V. Because of β(x0,t0)≤0 and∇∇uH(y0) = 0, we arrive at 0≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2+[2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(sq+s−1)2 s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2HF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2+(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +cW−1 qH+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2. (3.37) 17
2403.00002v1.pdf
34fe1f10-f454-4354-b401-715428b0e792
It follows from the h¨ older inequality that 2RicN(∇∇uW) W2≥ −2Kρ2 0F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2 ≥ −[2(1−ε)(s−1)2 N−ε(N−n)F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) s2q2W4+(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2] , (3.38) and (c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q≥ −[(2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4+W−2 qc2] ≥ −[(2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4+M2 1c2] ,(3.39) whereM1= supu(x).
2403.00002v1.pdf
1223a8ac-1473-4aef-819b-0bb9150d05cb
Now, let q >0 such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1 +(2s−1)2 8. Combining with ( 3.37), we get 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2≤(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2+M2 1c2 −4(1−ε)(sq+s−1) [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2HF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2−cW−1 qH ≤(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2+M2 1c2.(3.40) Hence H≤[N−ε(N−n)] 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2q2ρ2 0K+√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1csq. (3.41) we achieve the global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifold s. Remark 3.1. Theorem 1.1follows by taking ε=1 2,s= 2,q=2 27(N+n)in Theorem 3.1. 4 Local gradient estimates on forward complete Finsler spaces In this section, we prove the local gradient estimates on forward c omplete Finsler metric measure spaces with the assistance of Lemma 3.2and the Comparison theorem (cf. Theorem 2.1). Theorem 4.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a complete noncompact Finsler metric measure space. Denote by B(p,2R)the forward geodesic ball centered at pwith forward radius 2R.Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRicN≥ −K(2R)inB(p,2R)with 18
2403.00002v1.pdf
4304fedf-48a2-420a-8f65-d767042f8313
K(2R)≥0, and the misalignment αsatisfies α≤A(2R)inB(p,2R). Moreover, the non-Riemannian tensors satisfy F(U)+F∗(T)+F(divC(V))≤K0.Assume u(x,t) is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP para bolic equation ( 1.1) on M×[0,∞), then we have F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u ≤N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2 t+N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K(2R)+sc q√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1 +[N−ε(N−n)]s2 2(1−ε)R2{ C3[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+[N−ε(N−n)]s2 4(1−ε)(s−1)C2 1+2C2 1} .(4.1) onB(p,R)for0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, whereC1,C2are positive constants. Proof.In noncompact situation, we choose the cut-off function ˜ ϕ∈C2[0,+∞), such that { ˜ϕ(r) = 1r≤1 ˜ϕ(r) = 0r≥2.(4.2) So ˜ϕ(r)∈[0,1]. In addition, we supposed that −C1≤˜ϕ′(r) ˜ϕ1 2(r)≤0,−C2≤˜ϕ′′(r), (4.3) whereC1,C2are positive constants. For a fixed point p, denote by r(x) the forward distance function from pto any pointx.
2403.00002v1.pdf
4097fd8a-8658-453f-9c95-c29100d9a937
We define the cut-off function by ϕ(x) = ˜ϕ(r(x) R). So that F∇u(∇∇uϕ)≤√αC1 Rϕ1 2. (4.4) According to the curvature conditions and the Laplacian compariso n theorem on forward complete Finsler manifolds, it satisfies the Laplacian estimat ion [32] that ∆∇uϕ=˜ϕ′∆∇ur R+˜ϕ′′F2 ∇u(∇∇ur) R2 ≥ −C1 R[ C(N,A)√ K(2R) C(N,A)coth( R√ K(2R) C(N,A)) +C0(K0,A)] −αC2 R2 ≥ −C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))], (4.5) 19
2403.00002v1.pdf
78b44975-b0f7-486a-86ec-98c82e3d40b7
whereC3=C3(N,A,K 0) is a constant depending on K0,NandA. Defining Z=tH(x,t), we suppose that the support of function ϕ(x)Z(x,t) is contained in Bp(2R). For any fixed T >0, let (x0,t0) be the point where ϕ(x)Z(x,t) achieves its positive maximum, at which it satisfies that ∇(ϕZ) = 0,∂(ϕZ) ∂t≥0,∆(ϕZ)≤0. (4.6) (4.6) implies that ∇Z=−∇ϕ ϕZ, (4.7) and ∆ϕ·Z+2g∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uZ)+ϕ(∆−∂ ∂t)Z≤0, (4.8) at the maximum point ( x0,t0). Letβ=a q,a=sq2, employing Lemma 3.2,Letβ=a q,a=sq2, employing Lemma 3.2, we have (∆−∂ ∂t)Z=t(∆−∂ ∂t)H−H ≥[2(1−ε)(sq+s−1)2 N−ε(N−n)s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4t +2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 t+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 ε2q2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2Z +2 qg∇u(∇∇uZ,
2403.00002v1.pdf
2d0a5b1d-0853-436e-9f9e-63bbf9cf984f
∇∇ulogW)+cW−1 qZ+(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 qt +cW−1 qZ−2K(2R)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2t−Z t. (4.9) It follows from the h¨ older inequality that 2K(2R)tF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2≤2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(s−1)2 s2q2F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4t +N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2t,(4.10) and (c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 qt≥ −((2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4t+c2M2 1t) .(4.11) 20
2403.00002v1.pdf
adb3b68f-c689-457c-a3bf-ef4049882630
Substituting ( 4.10) and (4.11) into (4.9), and choosing s >1,q >0, such that 2(1−ε) ns−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, one may find that (∆−∂ ∂t)Z≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 t+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2Z +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uZ,∇∇ulogW) −Z t−N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2t−c2M2 1t.(4.12) Substituting ( 4.12) into (4.8) and noticing ( 4.7), we have 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 tϕ+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2Zϕ −2Z qg∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uW W)−Zϕ t−N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2(2R)ϕt −C2M2 1tϕ−C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]Z−2αC2 1 R2Z≤0.
2403.00002v1.pdf
356a7c0a-7b0e-4231-9276-90409fc3faa3
(4.13) It’s easy to know that 2Z qg∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uW W)≤4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u(∇W) W2Zϕ +N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2Z sq+s−1F2 ∇u(∇∇uϕ) ϕ.(4.14) Multiplying through by tϕat (4.13) and utilizing ( 4.14), we get that 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z2ϕ2−Zϕ−t{ 2αC2 1 R2 +N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)αC2 1 R2+C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]} Zϕ −t2[N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2+C2M2 1] ≤0.(4.15) 21
2403.00002v1.pdf
3e7f6ccf-bdc2-494e-9a8e-5e7f41b3462b
which implies that Zϕ≤[N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε){ 1+t( N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)C2 1 R2 +C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+2C2 1 R2)} +t√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2AK2+c2M2 1,(4.16) is satisfied at ( x0,t0).Clearly, corresponding to the assumption of ( x0,t0), one can deduce that sup x∈BpZ(x,T)≤Z(x0,t0)ϕ(x0) ≤[N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε){ 1+T( N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)C2 1 R2+2C2 1 R2 +C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))])} +T√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2AK(2R)2+c2M2 1.(4.17) Recall a result that, if a1,a2,a3≥0 then√a1√a2+a3≤√a1a2+√a1a3.
2403.00002v1.pdf
461531e3-2610-4d79-8669-ca9870c4fe45
Thus, F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u ≤N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2 t+N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K(2R)+sc q√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1 +[N−ε(N−n)]s2 2(1−ε)R2{ C3[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+[N−ε(N−n)]s2 4(1−ε)(s−1)C2 1+2C2 1} , (4.18) onB(p,2R), which is the desired inequality. Remark 4.1. Theorem 1.2follows from Theorem 4.1directly. References [1] G. Albanese and M. Rigoli. Lichnerowicz-type equations on complet e manifolds. Adv. Nonlinear Anal, 5(3), 223–250, 2016. 22
2403.00002v1.pdf
ed20d3bc-eead-45b5-b130-5ce5002ffb54
[2] C. Atkinson and G. Reuter. Deterministic epidemic waves. Math. P roc. Cam- bridge Philos. Soc., 80(2), 315–330, 1976. [3] M. Bailesteanu. Gradient estimates for the Heat equation under the Ricci- Harmonic map flow. Adv. Geom., 15(4), 445–454, 2015. [4] M. Bailesteanu, X. Cao, and A. Pulemotov. Gradient estimates fo r the Heat equation under the Ricci flow. J. Funct. Anal., 258(10), 3517–354 2, 2010. [5] K. Ball, E. A. Carlen, and E. H. Lieb. Sharp uniform convexity and s moothness inequalities for trace norms. Invent. Math., 115, 463–482, 1994. [6] P. W. Bates, X. Chen, and A. J. Chmaj.Traveling waves of bistab le dynamics on a lattice. Sima. J. Math. Anal., 35(2), 520–546, 2003. [7] K. Brown and J. Carr. Deterministic epidemic waves of critical velo city. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 81(3), 431–433, 1977. [8] X. Cao. Differential Harnack estimates for backward Heat equa tions with potentials under the Ricci flow. J. Funct. Anal., 255(4), 1024–103 8, 2008. [9] X. Cao and R. S. Hamilton. Differential Harnack estimates for time -dependent Heat equations with potentials. Geom. Funct. Anal., 19, 989–1000, 2009. [10] X. Cao, B. Liu, I. Pendleton, and A. Ward. Differential Harnack estimates for Fisher’s equation.Differential Harnack estimates for Fisher’s equation. Pac. J. Math., 290(2), 273–300, 2017. [11] X. Chen and J. Guo. Existence and asymptotic stability of trave ling waves of discrete quasilinear monostable equations. J. Differ. Equations, 18 4(2), 549–569, 2002. [12] X. Chen and J. Guo. Uniqueness and existence of traveling wave s for discrete quasilinear monostable dynamics. Math. Ann., 326(1), 123–146, 20 03. [13] S. Cheng and S. -T. Yau. Differential equations on Riemannian ma nifolds and their geometric applications. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 28(3), 333 –354, 1975. [14] S.-N. Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen.
2403.00002v1.pdf
42345d05-d7d7-4b4d-9a5b-cfcbb259bb13
Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen. Traveling waves in latt ice dynamical systems. J. Differ. Equations, 149(2), 248–291, 1998. [15] O. Diekmann. Thresholds and traveling waves for the geograph ical spread of infection. J. Math. Biol., 6(2), 109–130, 1978. [16] O. Diekmann and H. G. Kaper. On the bounded solutions of a nonlin ear convolution equation. Nonlinear Anal., 2(6), 721–737, 1978. [17] X. Geng and S. Hou. Gradient estimates for the Fisher–KPP equ ation on Riemannian manifolds. Boundary Value Probl., 2018(1), 1–12, 2018. 23
2403.00002v1.pdf
d223289e-fe18-47db-bfd5-1402f20c1074
[18] M. Ghergu and V. Radulescu. Nonlinear PDEs: Mathematical mod els in biol- ogy, chemistry and population genetics. Springer Monographs in Ma thematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. [19] J. Li. Gradient estimates and Harnack inequalities for nonlinear p arabolic and nonlinear elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds. J. Funct. Anal., 10 0(2), 233–256, 1991. [20] P. Li and S.-T. Yau. On the parabolic kernel of the Schr¨ odinge r operator. Acta Math. 156, 153–201, 1986. [21] J. Mallet-Paret. The global structure of traveling waves in spa tially discrete dynamical systems. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations , 11, 49–127, 1999. [22] J. D. Murray. Mathematical biology: I: An introduction. interd isciplinary applied mathematics.interd isciplinary applied mathematics. J. Math. Biol., Springer, New York, 2002. [23] J. D. Murray. Mathematical biology: II: Spatial models and biom edical applica- tions. J. Math. Biol., Springer, New York, 2003. [24] E. Negrin. Gradient estimates and a Liouville type theorem for th e Schr¨ odinger operator. J. Funct. Anal., 127(1), 198–203, 1995. [25] S. Ohta. Finsler interpolation inequalities. Calc. Var. Partial Diffe r. Equations, 36(2), 211–249, 2009. [26] S. Ohta. Nonlinear geometric analysis on Finsler manifolds. Eur. J . Math. 3(4), 916–952, 2017. [27] S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm.[27] S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm. Bochner–Weitzenb¨ ock formula and L i–Yau estimates on Finsler manifolds. Adv. Math., 252, 429–448, 2014. [28] H.-B. Rademacher. A sphere theorem for non-reversible Finsle r metrics. Math. Ann., 328(3), 373–387, 2004. [29] K. W. Schaaf. Asymptotic behavior and traveling wave solutions for parabolic functional differential equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 302(2) , 587–615, 1987. [30] K. Schumacher. Traveling-front solutions for integro-differe ntial equations. I., Walter de Gruyter, New York, 1980. [31] B. Shen. Gradient estimates of the Finslerian Allen-Cahn equatio n. preprint. [32] B. Shen.
2403.00002v1.pdf
bbdf434e-cbd6-4dd7-a6fa-1b6b64bd94be
[32] B. Shen. Operators on nonlinear metric measure spaces I: A ne w Laplacian comparison theorem on Finsler manifolds and a generalized Li-Yau app roach to gradient estimates of Finslerian Schr¨ odinger equation. arXiv:2312 .06617v1,2023. 24
2403.00002v1.pdf
7ed88134-fe55-4bfd-9d80-de7d794e12fb
[33] B. Shen. Vanishing of killing vector fields on compact Finsler manifo lds. Kodai Math. J, 41(1), 1–15, 2018. [34] Y. Shen and Z. Shen. Introduction to modern Finsler geometry . World Scientific Publishing Company, 2016. [35] Z. Shen. Volume comparison and its applications in Riemann–finsler geometry. Sib. Adv. Math. Siberian, 128(2), 306–328, 1997. [36] Z. Shen. Lectures on Finsler geometry. World Scientific, Singap ore, 2001. [37] P. Souplet and Q.-S. Zhang. Sharp gradient estimate and Yau’s L iouville theorem for the Heat equation on noncompact manifolds. Bull. Lond. Math. S oc., 38(6), 1045–1053, 2006.S oc., 38(6), 1045–1053, 2006. [38] H. R. Thieme and X.-Q. Zhao. Asymptotic speeds of spread and t raveling waves for integral equations and delayed reaction–diffusion models. J. Diff er. Equations, 195(2), 430–470, 2003. [39] B.Wu.ComparisontheoremsinFinslergeometrywithweightedcu rvaturebounds and related results. J. Korean Math. Soc., 52(3), 603–624, 2015 . [40] J. Wu and X. Zou. Asymptotic and periodic boundary value proble ms of mixed fdes and wave solutions of lattice differential equations. J. Differ. E quations , 135(2), 315–357, 1997. [41] C. Xia. Local gradient estimate for Harmonic functions on Finsle r manifolds. Calc. Var. Partial Differ.
2403.00002v1.pdf
844dc9bc-83a5-4076-9032-c4c754c0da88
Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equations , 51(3-4), 849–865, 2014. [42] Q. Xia. Geometric and functional inequalities on Finsler manifolds. J. Geom. Anal., 30(3), 3099–3148, 2020. [43] Y. Yang. Gradient estimates for a nonlinear parabolic equation o n Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 136(11), 4095–4102, 2008. [44] S.-T. Yau. Harmonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 28(2), 201–228, 1975. 25
2403.00002v1.pdf
69131eb6-2a3b-4d43-8f5d-96e04fc98b45
arXiv:2402.00001v1 [math.GM] 20 Sep 2023Proof the Collatz Conjecture by a new view of natural numbers FENG Jishe (School of Mathematics and Information Engineering, Longd ong University, Qingyang, Gansu, 745000, China.) Abstract The two main strategies used in this study are the binary represent ation and the decomposition of a natural number into many compound functions of odd function and even fun ction. The Collatz conjecture regarding odd even numbers in number theory can be examined and discussed u sing them in this way: The sequence createdby the finite iterationsofthe Collatz function becomesthe ultimately periodic sequenceifanynatural number is the beginning value, proving the conjecture that has bee n held for 85 years. Keywords: binary representation; composite function; Collatz conjecture; ultimately periodic sequence; chaos 1. Introduction In the study of number theory, odd and even numbers are a funda mental pair of ideas. Natural number sets come in two different varieties.Natural number sets come in two different varieties. Numerological theory frequen tly examines the connections between various numbers. There are numerous conjectures that attemp t to generalize the law of different sorts of natural numbers discovered in a restricted range to the entire infi nite set of natural numbers. This article will examine the famous Collatz conjecture, which states that for e ach natural number n, if it is even, divide by 2, if it is odd, multiply by 3, add 1, and so on, the result must finally re ach 1. It is also referred to as the 3n+ 1 conjecture and was put forth in 1937 by Lothar Collatz, also kno wn as the 3 n+1 problem. The mathematician Paul Erdos once said of this conjecture: ”Math ematics may not be ready for such problems”[1,2]. The inconsistencies between the finite and the infinite, as well as the relation between various kinds, present difficulties in the study of number theory problems.
2402.00001v1.pdf
926c5003-4a43-42c4-b22c-67e38da9ef09
We are t alking about the connection between two different mathematical ideas: the iterated sequence is a ultimat ely periodic sequence whether the initial value is odd or even. The finite and the infinite can be connected by the useful mathemat ical construct known as a function, and the resulting outcomes will also be finite and infinite. A special fun ction that has particular significance in discrete mathematics is the piecewise function. Compound functio ns and piecewise functions combined is Email address: E-mail: [email protected] (FENG Jishe) 0Received date: 2023-9-11. 0Foundation item: Educational technology innovation proje ct of Gansu Province (No. 2022A-133) Preprint submitted to Elsevier February 2, 2024
2402.00001v1.pdf
3dd27cd3-908e-40e2-bd6d-b4f586e6abf9
a highly clever mathematical trick. Particularly in number theory, wh ich is the most fundamental idea and mathematical expression, the sequence of numbers is a close conn ection between functions and finite and infinite. Numerous conjectures are obtained through restricted iteration of an iterative algorithm, which is a widely used method in number theory, but people typically lack the me ans to demonstrate the accuracy and reasoned nature of conjectures. A fresh technique or new k nowledge is frequently used to support a hypothesis. For the Collatz conjecture, we can describe it as a fun ction: T(n) =  3n+1,ifnis odd number, n 2ifnis even number.(1.1) The following sequence is obtained via the composite function (iterat ion): a={n,T(n),T(T(n)),T(T(T(n))),···}={n,T(n),T2(n),T3(n),···}.Consequently, the Collatz conjecture can be stated as follows: Th e sequence aalways leads to the integer 1, regardless of where you start with the natural number n, name lyTm(n) = 1. The series ais an infinite sequence of ultimately period[9,10]: the preperiod η(n) varies with the initial value n, but the ultimately period is always {4,2,1}. 2. Composition of odd and even functions and binary represen tation of natural numbers If a natural number can be divided by 2, it is said to be an even number ; otherwise, it is said to be odd number. The Peano’s Axiom states that 1 is the smallest natural number. The set of natural numbers N={1,2,3,···}may be separated into odd and even sets, we will utilize the standard definition of natural numbers in this work. {natural number }={odd number }⋃{even number }.{natural number }={odd number }⋃{even number }. In the set of natural numbers where 1 is the smallest odd number an d 2 is the smallest even number, we can use the expression n= 2k−1 to indicate that it is an odd, and the expression n= 2kto indicate that it is an even, where kis any natural number. We introduce two functions O(x) = 2x+ 1 to express odd numbers greater than 1, and E(x) = 2xto express even numbers. Definition 1 A natural number nis obtained by composition of the odd function O(x) = 2x+1 and the even function E(x) = 2xseveral times, namely n=f(f(···f(1))) =fk(1), the function fis either odd function O(x) or even function E(x).
2402.00001v1.pdf
99816c42-54d5-429d-a8d9-7d9ec8a220ba
For example, 7 = 2 ∗3+1= 2 ∗(2∗1+1+1)= O(O(1)),189 = 2∗2∗(2∗4+1)= 2 ∗(2∗(2∗(2∗1))+1)= E(O(E(E(1)))). In order to more clearly express the odd-even compositio n process of a natural number, we usebinary representation of a natural number n, for example: 7 = (111) 2, 18 = (10010) 2. Similarly, we can have a piecewise function f−1(n) =  n+1 2,ifnis odd number, n 2,ifnis even number.(2.1) Ifn=f(f(···f(1))) =fk(1), then the inverse function is f−k(n) = 1. For generalization, we give the definitions of three natural number s: 2
2402.00001v1.pdf
24c0587e-d46e-47db-9c76-77d636c92eb8
Definition 2(i) By applying the odd function O(x)mcompositions, a natural number, namely Om(1) = 2m−1 = 2m−1+2m−2+···+2+1= (11 ···1)2, is obtained.
2402.00001v1.pdf
5d46421e-9982-4bad-863e-b9ad5e658284
such as 3 = (11) 2,7 = (111) 2,15 = (1111) 2,31 = (11111) 2,63 = (111111) 2,···, which we call it as pure odd number ; (ii)By applying the even function E(x)mcompositions, a natural number, namely Em(1) = 2m= (10···0)2, is obtained, such as, 2 = (10) 2,4 = (100) 2,8 = (1000) 2,16 = (10000) 2,32 = (100000) 2,64 = (1000000) 2,···, which we call it as pure even number ; (iii)The natural number obtained by the composition of odd function O(x) and even function E(x), we call itmixed number . Such as, 18 = (10010) 2,28 = (11100) 2,67 = (1000011) 2,309 = (100110101) 2.In particular, the naturalnumbersobtained bythe finite alternat elycomposition ofthe odd function O(x) and the even function E(x), namely, [ E(O(1))]m= (101···101)2. Such as 5 = (101) 2,21 = (10101) 2,85 = (1010101) 2,341 = (101010101) 2,1365 = (10101010101) 2,5461 = (1010101010101) 2,···, which we call hard number . Definition 3 The binary string of a natural number is a representation of its odd -even composite function, where the 1 in the i(i >0)-bit from right to left is the i(i >0) sub-odd function, and 0 is the corresponding sub-even function. For a natural number n, if its binary string has kbits, then the degree of composite function is k−1.The binary string of a pure odd number is made of all 1; and the binary string of a pure even number is all 0 aside from one 1 in left; the binary string of a mixed number is made of many 0 and 1. Fig.1 shows the decomposition of the composite function (inverse of the composite function) of 60. 60=2* 2* 2* 2* 2*1+1)+1)+1))=E(E(O(O(O(1))))=(111100) 2 Figure 2.1: Natural number 60 is obtained from 1 through the c omposition of five even and odd functions, its binary string i s (111100) 2.In this way, we can classify the set of natural numbers in another w ay, Property 4 The set of natural numbers can be divided into three different sets : {natural number }={pure odd number }⋃ {pure even number }⋃ {mixed number } The pure odd number is an odd number, the pure even number is an ev en number, and mixed numbers can be either an odd number or an even number when compared to th e conventional classification. The last bit of the binary string, which is either 0 or 1, indicates whether it is ev en or odd. The entire binary string implicitly indicates one of the following three types: all bits are 0s with t he exception of one 1 in the left 3
2402.00001v1.pdf
b7831281-0846-4916-8505-f78b024a9a93
implicitly pure even, all bits are 1s implicitly pure odd, and there are 0 an d 1 in any number of bits of the binary string implicitly mixed. Example 1 (1)60, 97 are mixed numbers. (2)64,1180591620717411303424 are pure even numbers. (3)63,1180591620717411303423 are pure odd numbers.(3)63,1180591620717411303423 are pure odd numbers. 60 = 2∗30 = 2∗(2∗15) = 2∗(2∗(2∗7+1))) = 2 ∗(2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗3)+1)+1))) = 2 ∗(2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗ (2∗1+1)+1)+1))) = E(E(O(O(O(1)))) = (111100) 2; 97 = 2∗48+1 = 2 ∗(2∗24)+1 = 2 ∗(2∗(2∗12))+1 = 2 ∗(2∗(2∗(2∗6)))+1 = 2 ∗(2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗3)))+1 = 2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗(2∗1+1))))+1 = O(E(E(E(E(O(1)))))) = (1100001) 2.64 = 26= (1000000) 2,1180591620717411303424= 270= (10000 ···0)2are pure even numbers; 63 = 26−1 = (111111) 2,1180591620717411303423= 270−1 = (11···1)2are pure odd numbers. This composite function has special significance, for example, Example 2 Let [x] bexthe integer part, that is, [ x] =max{y∈Z:y≤x},{x}be fractional part, namely{x}=x−[x]. Assuming g(x) =1 [x]−{x}+1, is rational set Q+and rational set Qcan be expressed as respectively Q+={g(0),g2(0),g3(0),···}, Q={0,g(0),−g(0),g2(0),−g2(0),g3(0),−g3(0),···}. See the references[5]for proof. 3.
2402.00001v1.pdf
d0e8fd55-7fa3-4e56-a970-e9a57b3f7d9e
See the references[5]for proof. 3. Tabular and algebraic expressions For the Collatz conjecture, if expressed by the function T(n), we find that Tk(n) = 1. For the sake of discussion, we combine the compound function (iter ative relation) to get the reduced Collatz function RT(n) =  3n+1 2m,ifnis odd number, n 2rifnis even number.(3.1) The result is an odd number. We introduce tabular form and algebraic expression to express the reduced Collatz function RT(n). For example, for n= 67 we use the formula (1.1) and iteration, get the following table. Wh ere the last column is its algebraic expression:.Wh ere the last column is its algebraic expression:. 67→202→10138 219·6737 219 101→304→152→76→38→1936 218 19→58→2935 214 29→88→44→22→1134 213 11→34→1733 210 17→52→26→1332 29 13→40→20→10→53 27 5→16→8→4→2→11 24 1 4
2402.00001v1.pdf
026e93da-94dc-442f-823c-d1e89020c727
Representing the numbers in the table by its binary string to get 1000011→11001010 →110010138 219·6737 219 1100101→100110000 →10011000 →1001100→100110→1001136 218 10011→111010→1110135 214 11101→1011000→101100→10110→101134 213 1011→100010→1000133 210 10001→110100→11010→110132 29 1101→101000→10100→1010→1013 27 101→ 10000→ 1000→ 100→ 10→ 11 24 1 The above table is simplified with the help of the reduced Collatz functio n, and the simplified binary string table obtained is as follows, and we will use this form as the defa ult table in the rest of this article.1000011→11001010 →110010138 219·6737 219 1100101→100110000 →1001136 218 10011→111010→1110135 214 11101→1011000→101134 213 1011→100010→1000133 210 10001→110100→110132 29 1101→101000→1013 27 101→ 10000→ 11 24 1 In the future, we will use this table as a research tool to write the a lgebraic expression of the last column in the table: T27(67) =T(8,19,67) =1 24+3 27+32 29+33 210+34 213+35 214+36 218+37 219+38 219·67 = 1 In general, the algebraic expressions are obtained: Starting from the last row of the table and going up to the binary corresponding to the initial value n of the first row, th e numerator is 3k,k= 0,1,2,3,···,
2402.00001v1.pdf
5e905a15-f590-4ba1-a34e-982607bd360e
k= 0,1,2,3,···, The denominator is 2rk,r0=m0,rk=rk−1+mk,k= 1,2,3,···,mkhere for the before k lines at the end of the second column of binary string number 0. The details are expres sed in the last line of the corresponding table, and we write out the algebraic expression of them as follows: 5
2402.00001v1.pdf
8193844e-5eef-4514-bb9b-f41a650ebe68
T106(31) =1 24+3 29+32 210+33 211+34 214+35 218+36 220+37 222+38 226+39 227 +310 228+311 229+312 232+313 233+314 234+315 235+316 236+317 237+318 239 +319 240+320 242+321 243+322 244+323 247+324 249+325 250+326 251+327 252 +328 254+329 255+330 256+331 258+332 259+333 261+334 263+335 264+336 265 +337 266+338 267+339 267·31 = 1 T107(63)1 T107(63) =1 24+3 29+32 210+33 211+34 214+35 218+36 220+37 222+38 226+39 227 +310 228+311 229+312 232+313 233+314 234+315 235+316 236+317 237+318 239 +319 240+320 242+321 243+322 244+323 247+324 249+325 250+326 251+327 252 +328 254+329 255+330 256+331 258+332 259+333 263+334 264+335 265+336 266 +337 267+338 268+339 268·63 = 1 T118(97)1 T118(97) =1 24+3 29+32 210+33 211+34 214+35 218+36 220+37 222+38 226+39 227 +310 228+311 229+312 232+313 233+314 234+315 235+316 236+317 237+318 239 +319 240+320 242+321 243+322 244+323 247+324 249+325 250+326 251+327 252 +328 254+329 255+330 256+331 258+332 259+333 261+334 263+335 264+336 265 +337 266+338 269+339 270+340 271+341 273+342 275+343 275·97 = 1 T91(10027)
2402.00001v1.pdf
58e19e34-3f24-4b50-8a10-e0ebe9bcff38
1 T91(10027) =1 24+3 29+32 210+33 211+34 214+35 218+36 220+37 222+38 226+39 227 +310 228+311 229+312 232+313 233+314 234+315 235+316 236+317 237+318 239 +319 242+320 243+321 244+322 245+323 248+324 249+325 253+326 256+327 258 +328 260+329 261+330 261·10027 = 1 6
2402.00001v1.pdf
94a06d0a-4f6f-4651-ac27-9cd00da7da12
4. The characteristics of sequence of binary string of the Co llatz function iteration The Collatz function is expressed in binary form as T(n) =  (11)2·(1×···×1)2+1 = (1 ×××10···0)2,ifnis odd number, (1×···×10···00)2 (10)2= (1×···×10···0)2,ifnis even number.(4.1) The characteristics of the first and last parts are represented b y the figure 2. 1 0 Grows to the left by two bits 10.The last bit must be 0,and the penultimate bit does not change.11y x1 11y x1 0z x 1 1 0 Grows to the left by one bit 1.100 x1 100 x1 11 x The last bit must be 0,and the penultimate bit does not change.Figure4.1: Binaryrepresentation ofthe Collatzfunction, add up atmosttwo digitsfromthe leftsideofthe binary strin g,subtract at least one digit from the right side of the binary string. Byobservingthe binarystringsofiteratedCollatzfunctionswith init ialvaluesof31,63(seethe tabulation procedure in reference [7]) and 97,10027 as the follows, we get some laws of pure even, pure odd and mixed numbers with initial values. In the following, we will analyze and discuss the table of the iterative process of the Collatz functions from the two dimensions of row and column of the tables. 7
2402.00001v1.pdf
248e2d7f-5bd8-4cf3-a3e8-b09546be3392
343 275·97 97 = (1100001) 2→ (100100100) 2→ (1001001) 2342 275 73 = (1001001) 2→ (11011100) 2→ (110111) 2341 273 55 = (110111) 2→ (10100110) 2→ (1010011) 2340 271 83 = (1010011) 2→ (11111010) 2→ (1111101) 2339 270 125 = (1111101) 2→ (101111000) 2→ (101111) 2338 269 47 = (101111) 2→ (10001110) 2→ (1000111) 2337 266 71 = (1000111) 2→ (11010110) 2→ (1101011) 2336 265 107 = (1101011) 2→ (101000010) 2→ (10100001) 2335 264 161 = (10100001) 2→ (111100100) 2→= (10100001) 2→ (111100100) 2→ (1111001) 2334 263 121 = (1111001) 2→ (101101100) 2→ (1011011) 2333 261 91 = (1011011) 2→ (100010010) 2→ (10001001) 2332 259 137 = (10001001) 2→ (110011100) 2→ (1100111) 2331 258 103 = (1100111) 2→ (100110110) 2→ (10011011) 2330 256 155 = (10011011) 2→ (111010010) 2→ (11101001) 2329 255 233 = (11101001) 2→ (1010111100) 2→ (10101111) 2328 254 175 = (10101111) 2→ (1000001110) 2→ (100000111) 2327 252 263 = (100000111) 2→ (1100010110) 2→
2402.00001v1.pdf
edf17af0-5b9e-443f-aa43-d926729ffaeb