version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance | the minion is not insane. | {B}{b} | sent1: that the Pole is a lumma hold. sent2: the fact that the minion does not repress Comstock and is cenobitic is not correct if the Pole is a lumma. sent3: if that that something does not repress Comstock but it is cenobitic hold is not right then it is not sane. | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the minion does not repress Comstock and is cenobitic is not correct.; sent3 -> int2: the minion is not sane if that it does not repress Comstock and it is cenobitic is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent3 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the minion is not insane. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Pole is a lumma hold. sent2: the fact that the minion does not repress Comstock and is cenobitic is not correct if the Pole is a lumma. sent3: if that that something does not repress Comstock but it is cenobitic hold is not right then it is not sane. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the minion does not repress Comstock and is cenobitic is not correct.; sent3 -> int2: the minion is not sane if that it does not repress Comstock and it is cenobitic is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the stroke does not buzz coo and buzzes Sumerology is wrong. | ¬(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) | sent1: the stroke does not buzz coo if the brogan buzz coo. sent2: if the conferee is postmillennial the stroke does buzz Sumerology. sent3: something is ecological if it is postmillennial. sent4: the conferee is postmillennial. sent5: the brogan buzzes coo and/or it is ecological. sent6: if that the brogan is ecological is not wrong then the stroke does not buzz coo. | sent1: {C}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): {A}x -> {D}x sent4: {A}{a} sent5: ({C}{c} v {D}{c}) sent6: {D}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the stroke buzzes Sumerology.; sent5 & sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the stroke does not buzz coo.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 & sent1 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the sprog is not non-ecological. | {D}{eo} | [
"sent3 -> int3: if the sprog is postmillennial it is ecological.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the stroke does not buzz coo and buzzes Sumerology is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the stroke does not buzz coo if the brogan buzz coo. sent2: if the conferee is postmillennial the stroke does buzz Sumerology. sent3: something is ecological if it is postmillennial. sent4: the conferee is postmillennial. sent5: the brogan buzzes coo and/or it is ecological. sent6: if that the brogan is ecological is not wrong then the stroke does not buzz coo. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the stroke buzzes Sumerology.; sent5 & sent1 & sent6 -> int2: the stroke does not buzz coo.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the ship is not apostrophic is correct. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: there is something such that it is not caruncular and it does repress suzerain. sent2: if a non-caruncular thing represses suzerain that the ship is apostrophic hold. | sent1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the ship is not apostrophic is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not caruncular and it does repress suzerain. sent2: if a non-caruncular thing represses suzerain that the ship is apostrophic hold. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that that it is not a Ashurbanipal and is not old is not right does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: the piano is not old. sent2: the nasal is not an antic. sent3: the nasal is not a Y2K. sent4: the quinidine is not a Y2K. sent5: the fact that the nasal is not a kind of a Ashurbanipal and is a kind of a trail is not true if it is not a roots. sent6: if the neoprene is non-exocentric the fact that that it does not smile motorman and it is an old is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Ashurbanipal and it is an old does not hold. sent8: that the nasal is not a Y2K but a romantic does not hold. sent9: that the nasal is not a Y2K and is not suctorial is not correct. sent10: the fact that the nasal lunges Arnhem and is not a Ashurbanipal does not hold. sent11: if the abalone is not tribal then the fact that it is not a Malory and it does not smile piecework is false. sent12: the fact that the nasal is not a kind of a Y2K and lunges Tom does not hold. sent13: the fact that the nasal is not old but it is blastocoelic is wrong. sent14: if the nasal is not a Y2K then that it is not a Ashurbanipal and not old is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the macaque is a kind of a diocesan but it is not a Ashurbanipal does not hold. sent16: that that the nasal does not repress locust and it is not a Mancunian is not incorrect does not hold if it is a Y2K. sent17: there exists something such that that it is both staccato and not cortico-hypothalamic does not hold. | sent1: ¬{AB}{hh} sent2: ¬{S}{a} sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{A}{cs} sent5: ¬{IT}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {CU}{a}) sent6: ¬{DL}{ig} -> ¬(¬{AU}{ig} & {AB}{ig}) sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {DI}{a}) sent9: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{GR}{a}) sent10: ¬({AR}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent11: ¬{HL}{hk} -> ¬(¬{O}{hk} & ¬{EI}{hk}) sent12: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {EH}{a}) sent13: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {HG}{a}) sent14: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent15: ¬({AK}{j} & ¬{AA}{j}) sent16: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{R}{a} & ¬{AF}{a}) sent17: (Ex): ¬({BU}x & ¬{FD}x) | [
"sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the nasal is both not a Ashurbanipal and not old is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent14 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that that it does not repress locust and it is not a Mancunian is false. | (Ex): ¬(¬{R}x & ¬{AF}x) | []
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is not a Ashurbanipal and is not old is not right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the piano is not old. sent2: the nasal is not an antic. sent3: the nasal is not a Y2K. sent4: the quinidine is not a Y2K. sent5: the fact that the nasal is not a kind of a Ashurbanipal and is a kind of a trail is not true if it is not a roots. sent6: if the neoprene is non-exocentric the fact that that it does not smile motorman and it is an old is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Ashurbanipal and it is an old does not hold. sent8: that the nasal is not a Y2K but a romantic does not hold. sent9: that the nasal is not a Y2K and is not suctorial is not correct. sent10: the fact that the nasal lunges Arnhem and is not a Ashurbanipal does not hold. sent11: if the abalone is not tribal then the fact that it is not a Malory and it does not smile piecework is false. sent12: the fact that the nasal is not a kind of a Y2K and lunges Tom does not hold. sent13: the fact that the nasal is not old but it is blastocoelic is wrong. sent14: if the nasal is not a Y2K then that it is not a Ashurbanipal and not old is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the macaque is a kind of a diocesan but it is not a Ashurbanipal does not hold. sent16: that that the nasal does not repress locust and it is not a Mancunian is not incorrect does not hold if it is a Y2K. sent17: there exists something such that that it is both staccato and not cortico-hypothalamic does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent14 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the nasal is both not a Ashurbanipal and not old is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the gingham does repress dropper. | {A}{b} | sent1: the grasshopper does accuse if it does not lunge Cappadocia and it is non-masochistic. sent2: if something is not a Garnier it does not repress dropper. sent3: the gingham is archiepiscopal. sent4: that something is sorrowful and is not untruthful is not right if the fact that it accuses is correct. sent5: if that the gingham is not premenstrual and it is not a kind of a Garnier is not right then it is jurisprudential. sent6: the skirt is not sorrowful if there is something such that that it is a kind of sorrowful thing that is not untruthful is wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it sides and it does not repress grasshopper is incorrect then the uranium does repress grasshopper. sent8: the grasshopper does not lunge Cappadocia. sent9: if the skirt represses dropper the gingham fine-tunes. sent10: the gingham does repress dropper if the skirt is a Garnier. sent11: the fact that that the gingham is not premenstrual and not a Garnier is true does not hold. sent12: the grasshopper is not masochistic if the uranium is not maximal and is not masochistic. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of a siding that does not repress grasshopper is not correct. sent14: the gingham is a Garnier. sent15: if that the skirt does not repress dropper and is not quadratics does not hold the fact that it is agreeable is not wrong. sent16: if that something is not a Burundi and it is not a riptide does not hold then it is not a Garnier. sent17: if the skirt is archiepiscopal then it is a Garnier. sent18: something is a kind of non-maximal thing that is not masochistic if it represses grasshopper. sent19: the skirt is a Garnier if that it is non-archiepiscopal thing that does not fine-tune is wrong. sent20: the fact that the skirt is archiepiscopal but it does not fine-tune is not correct. sent21: the gingham is a Garnier if the fact that it does not repress dropper and is non-archiepiscopal does not hold. sent22: the gingham fine-tunes. | sent1: (¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> {F}{c} sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x sent3: {AA}{b} sent4: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) sent5: ¬(¬{AR}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {IP}{b} sent6: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent7: (x): ¬({L}x & ¬{K}x) -> {K}{d} sent8: ¬{I}{c} sent9: {A}{a} -> {AB}{b} sent10: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent11: ¬(¬{AR}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent12: (¬{J}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent13: (Ex): ¬({L}x & ¬{K}x) sent14: {B}{b} sent15: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{IT}{a}) -> {FT}{a} sent16: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent17: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} sent18: (x): {K}x -> (¬{J}x & ¬{H}x) sent19: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent20: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent21: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> {B}{b} sent22: {AB}{b} | []
| []
| the gingham does not repress dropper. | ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the gingham does not repress dropper if it is not a kind of a Garnier.; sent16 -> int2: if that the gingham is a kind of non-Burundi thing that is not a riptide is incorrect then it is not a Garnier.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the grasshopper is sorrowful and not untruthful does not hold if it accuses.; sent18 -> int4: if the uranium represses grasshopper it is not maximal and it is not masochistic.; sent13 & sent7 -> int5: the uranium does repress grasshopper.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the uranium is non-maximal and it is not masochistic.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: that the grasshopper is not masochistic hold.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the grasshopper does not lunge Cappadocia and is not masochistic.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the grasshopper accuses.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the fact that the grasshopper is sorrowful but it is not untruthful is false is not incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is sorrowful thing that is not untruthful is incorrect.; int11 & sent6 -> int12: the skirt is not sorrowful.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not sorrowful.;"
]
| 12 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the gingham does repress dropper. ; $context$ = sent1: the grasshopper does accuse if it does not lunge Cappadocia and it is non-masochistic. sent2: if something is not a Garnier it does not repress dropper. sent3: the gingham is archiepiscopal. sent4: that something is sorrowful and is not untruthful is not right if the fact that it accuses is correct. sent5: if that the gingham is not premenstrual and it is not a kind of a Garnier is not right then it is jurisprudential. sent6: the skirt is not sorrowful if there is something such that that it is a kind of sorrowful thing that is not untruthful is wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it sides and it does not repress grasshopper is incorrect then the uranium does repress grasshopper. sent8: the grasshopper does not lunge Cappadocia. sent9: if the skirt represses dropper the gingham fine-tunes. sent10: the gingham does repress dropper if the skirt is a Garnier. sent11: the fact that that the gingham is not premenstrual and not a Garnier is true does not hold. sent12: the grasshopper is not masochistic if the uranium is not maximal and is not masochistic. sent13: there is something such that that it is a kind of a siding that does not repress grasshopper is not correct. sent14: the gingham is a Garnier. sent15: if that the skirt does not repress dropper and is not quadratics does not hold the fact that it is agreeable is not wrong. sent16: if that something is not a Burundi and it is not a riptide does not hold then it is not a Garnier. sent17: if the skirt is archiepiscopal then it is a Garnier. sent18: something is a kind of non-maximal thing that is not masochistic if it represses grasshopper. sent19: the skirt is a Garnier if that it is non-archiepiscopal thing that does not fine-tune is wrong. sent20: the fact that the skirt is archiepiscopal but it does not fine-tune is not correct. sent21: the gingham is a Garnier if the fact that it does not repress dropper and is non-archiepiscopal does not hold. sent22: the gingham fine-tunes. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a Uzbekistan or it is not non-pyretic or both is incorrect. | (Ex): ¬({A}x v {B}x) | sent1: the pantsuit is non-pyretic. sent2: that the millionairess is non-pyretic hold if the capote is not non-pyretic. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Uzbekistan. sent4: the spackle does not buzz haircut. sent5: the capote is not Chechen if the millionairess is not a rinse and it is not burrlike. sent6: that something is a Kastler and pyretic is not right if it is not a kind of a Chechen. sent7: the capote is not pyretic if the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration and is not emotional. sent8: the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration and is not emotional. sent9: the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration. sent10: the pantsuit is not pyretic if there exists something such that that it is both a Kastler and pyretic is not true. sent11: the conidium is not rhombic if it does not buzz haircut or it does not buzz Veda or both. sent12: the millionairess is not a rinse and is not burrlike if there exists something such that it is not rhombic. sent13: if the pantsuit does lunge elaboration but it is not emotional the capote is non-pyretic. sent14: the millionairess is not a Tyrolean. sent15: the soloist is not a Uzbekistan and is not a loom. sent16: there exists something such that either it is a kind of a Uzbekistan or it is pyretic or both. sent17: the cambric is a kind of a Uzbekistan and does not lunge elaboration if there exists something such that it is not pyretic. sent18: the conidium does not buzz haircut or does not buzz Veda or both if there is something such that it does not buzz haircut. sent19: the millionairess is not pyretic. | sent1: ¬{B}{a} sent2: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent4: ¬{H}{e} sent5: (¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent7: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent9: ¬{AA}{a} sent10: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent11: (¬{H}{d} v ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{d} sent12: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent13: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent14: ¬{AO}{c} sent15: (¬{A}{bp} & ¬{FS}{bp}) sent16: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x) sent17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}{ic} & ¬{AA}{ic}) sent18: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{H}{d} v ¬{I}{d}) sent19: ¬{B}{c} | [
"sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the capote is not pyretic.;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b};"
]
| the fact that the cambric does not lunge elaboration is true. | ¬{AA}{ic} | [
"sent6 -> int2: that the capote is a Kastler and it is pyretic is false if it is not Chechen.; sent4 -> int3: there is something such that it does not buzz haircut.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the conidium does not buzz haircut and/or it does not buzz Veda.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the conidium is not rhombic.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is not rhombic.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the fact that the millionairess is not a rinse and not burrlike hold.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the capote is not Chechen.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the capote is a Kastler that is pyretic is not right.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Kastler and it is pyretic is not correct.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the pantsuit is not pyretic.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is non-pyretic is not wrong.; int12 & sent17 -> int13: the cambric is a Uzbekistan and does not lunge elaboration.; int13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 12 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that either it is a kind of a Uzbekistan or it is not non-pyretic or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the pantsuit is non-pyretic. sent2: that the millionairess is non-pyretic hold if the capote is not non-pyretic. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Uzbekistan. sent4: the spackle does not buzz haircut. sent5: the capote is not Chechen if the millionairess is not a rinse and it is not burrlike. sent6: that something is a Kastler and pyretic is not right if it is not a kind of a Chechen. sent7: the capote is not pyretic if the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration and is not emotional. sent8: the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration and is not emotional. sent9: the pantsuit does not lunge elaboration. sent10: the pantsuit is not pyretic if there exists something such that that it is both a Kastler and pyretic is not true. sent11: the conidium is not rhombic if it does not buzz haircut or it does not buzz Veda or both. sent12: the millionairess is not a rinse and is not burrlike if there exists something such that it is not rhombic. sent13: if the pantsuit does lunge elaboration but it is not emotional the capote is non-pyretic. sent14: the millionairess is not a Tyrolean. sent15: the soloist is not a Uzbekistan and is not a loom. sent16: there exists something such that either it is a kind of a Uzbekistan or it is pyretic or both. sent17: the cambric is a kind of a Uzbekistan and does not lunge elaboration if there exists something such that it is not pyretic. sent18: the conidium does not buzz haircut or does not buzz Veda or both if there is something such that it does not buzz haircut. sent19: the millionairess is not pyretic. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the capote is not pyretic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the potash is not inoperable but non-operatic. | ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) | sent1: that the potash is both operable and not operatic does not hold if the Angolese is a Antarctic. sent2: if something is not angiospermous and does twig then the fact that it is not clockwise hold. sent3: the pyroxylin does not refocus if that the hibiscus does repress baldric and represses Faroese is false. sent4: the fact that the potash does not repress aorist is not incorrect if something is nonlinear. sent5: something is a Antarctic. sent6: the potash does twig. sent7: there exists something such that it does not repress baldric. sent8: the fact that the fact that the pyroxylin is clockwise but it is not trinucleate is not correct if the pyroxylin does not refocus hold. sent9: if the potash is not clockwise it is not operatic. sent10: the potash does twig if there is something such that it is a kind of a Antarctic. sent11: the tulip represses goosander and is not operatic. sent12: the potash is non-angiospermous thing that does twig if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Antarctic. sent13: the potash is both operable and not operatic if it is not clockwise. sent14: something is not capsular if it lunges Wren and it is a full-of-the-moon. | sent1: {A}{b} -> ¬({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent2: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: ¬({J}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent4: (x): {CO}x -> ¬{HM}{a} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: {C}{a} sent7: (Ex): ¬{J}x sent8: ¬{H}{c} -> ¬({D}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent9: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬{E}{a} sent10: (x): {A}x -> {C}{a} sent11: ({GR}{ir} & ¬{E}{ir}) sent12: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent13: ¬{D}{a} -> ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent14: (x): ({GU}x & {HF}x) -> ¬{IH}x | [
"sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the potash is not angiospermous and does twig.; sent2 -> int2: if the potash is a kind of non-angiospermous thing that does twig then it is not clockwise.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potash is not clockwise.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent12 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent2 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{D}{a}; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the potash is both operable and not operatic does not hold. | ¬({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) | []
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the potash is not inoperable but non-operatic. ; $context$ = sent1: that the potash is both operable and not operatic does not hold if the Angolese is a Antarctic. sent2: if something is not angiospermous and does twig then the fact that it is not clockwise hold. sent3: the pyroxylin does not refocus if that the hibiscus does repress baldric and represses Faroese is false. sent4: the fact that the potash does not repress aorist is not incorrect if something is nonlinear. sent5: something is a Antarctic. sent6: the potash does twig. sent7: there exists something such that it does not repress baldric. sent8: the fact that the fact that the pyroxylin is clockwise but it is not trinucleate is not correct if the pyroxylin does not refocus hold. sent9: if the potash is not clockwise it is not operatic. sent10: the potash does twig if there is something such that it is a kind of a Antarctic. sent11: the tulip represses goosander and is not operatic. sent12: the potash is non-angiospermous thing that does twig if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Antarctic. sent13: the potash is both operable and not operatic if it is not clockwise. sent14: something is not capsular if it lunges Wren and it is a full-of-the-moon. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent12 -> int1: the potash is not angiospermous and does twig.; sent2 -> int2: if the potash is a kind of non-angiospermous thing that does twig then it is not clockwise.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potash is not clockwise.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the A-bomb is not Coleridgian. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: the molar is a crew. sent2: if the fact that something represses sandman and is not Coleridgian does not hold then it is not a crew. sent3: the molar is Coleridgian and/or represses sandman. sent4: something that is a crew is a scatter. sent5: if something does crow and/or it does repress sandman the A-bomb is Coleridgian. sent6: the A-bomb is not Coleridgian if the molar is non-Coleridgian thing that does not repress sandman. sent7: the molar does repress Midwest. sent8: the fact that the molar does not repress sandman and is a crew does not hold if it does not lunge fleece. sent9: if there is something such that it does dismiss or it does repress sandman or both then the fact that the einsteinium is tubercular is right. sent10: the map-reader is Coleridgian. sent11: if something that does not lunge fleece is a kind of a Runyon it is not Coleridgian. sent12: the fact that something does repress sandman but it is not Coleridgian does not hold if it does not lunge fleece. | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent3: ({C}{a} v {B}{a}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> {HI}x sent5: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> {C}{b} sent6: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent7: {EH}{a} sent8: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent9: (x): ({DH}x v {B}x) -> {GP}{ft} sent10: {C}{cg} sent11: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) | [
"sent1 -> int1: either the molar does crow or it represses sandman or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is a crew or it represses sandman or both.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x); int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the A-bomb is not Coleridgian. | ¬{C}{b} | []
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the A-bomb is not Coleridgian. ; $context$ = sent1: the molar is a crew. sent2: if the fact that something represses sandman and is not Coleridgian does not hold then it is not a crew. sent3: the molar is Coleridgian and/or represses sandman. sent4: something that is a crew is a scatter. sent5: if something does crow and/or it does repress sandman the A-bomb is Coleridgian. sent6: the A-bomb is not Coleridgian if the molar is non-Coleridgian thing that does not repress sandman. sent7: the molar does repress Midwest. sent8: the fact that the molar does not repress sandman and is a crew does not hold if it does not lunge fleece. sent9: if there is something such that it does dismiss or it does repress sandman or both then the fact that the einsteinium is tubercular is right. sent10: the map-reader is Coleridgian. sent11: if something that does not lunge fleece is a kind of a Runyon it is not Coleridgian. sent12: the fact that something does repress sandman but it is not Coleridgian does not hold if it does not lunge fleece. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: either the molar does crow or it represses sandman or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is a crew or it represses sandman or both.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the acebutolol is not unalert but it is an ogre. | (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) | sent1: there exists something such that it is not respiratory. sent2: if that there exists something such that the fact that it is respiratory does not hold hold then the acebutolol is a tellurian. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a} | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the acebutolol is a tellurian.;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: {B}{a};"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the acebutolol is not unalert but it is an ogre. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not respiratory. sent2: if that there exists something such that the fact that it is respiratory does not hold hold then the acebutolol is a tellurian. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the acebutolol is a tellurian.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it is allelic. | (Ex): {B}x | sent1: there is something such that it represses farad. sent2: the mephobarbital is allelic if the Lotus is insensible. sent3: the Lotus is an adjustment. sent4: if that the Lotus is insensible hold the parrotfish is allelic. sent5: there is something such that it does peel. sent6: there is something such that it is a fragment. sent7: the domicile is Iranian. sent8: the Lotus is not allelic if the parrotfish is postexilic but it is not allelic. sent9: the sitter is unworldly. sent10: something is a ianfu. sent11: the parrotfish is acyclic. sent12: the parrotfish is insensible. sent13: there is something such that it is bromidic. sent14: the Lotus is a monocarp. sent15: the parrotfish is ursine. sent16: the Lotus is allelic if the parrotfish is insensible. sent17: the Lotus is insensible if that the parrotfish is allelic hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is not sensible. sent19: the opacification is insensible. sent20: there exists something such that it is acetic. sent21: that the sorehead is insensible is not incorrect. | sent1: (Ex): {DA}x sent2: {A}{b} -> {B}{bi} sent3: {JA}{b} sent4: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent5: (Ex): {BO}x sent6: (Ex): {IE}x sent7: {HR}{hf} sent8: ({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: {AS}{dk} sent10: (Ex): {CL}x sent11: {CC}{a} sent12: {A}{a} sent13: (Ex): {HQ}x sent14: {AH}{b} sent15: {HL}{a} sent16: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent17: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent18: (Ex): {A}x sent19: {A}{ja} sent20: (Ex): {BN}x sent21: {A}{it} | [
"sent16 & sent12 -> int1: the Lotus is allelic.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 & sent12 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the Lotus is not non-top-down is not false. | {IN}{b} | []
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is allelic. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it represses farad. sent2: the mephobarbital is allelic if the Lotus is insensible. sent3: the Lotus is an adjustment. sent4: if that the Lotus is insensible hold the parrotfish is allelic. sent5: there is something such that it does peel. sent6: there is something such that it is a fragment. sent7: the domicile is Iranian. sent8: the Lotus is not allelic if the parrotfish is postexilic but it is not allelic. sent9: the sitter is unworldly. sent10: something is a ianfu. sent11: the parrotfish is acyclic. sent12: the parrotfish is insensible. sent13: there is something such that it is bromidic. sent14: the Lotus is a monocarp. sent15: the parrotfish is ursine. sent16: the Lotus is allelic if the parrotfish is insensible. sent17: the Lotus is insensible if that the parrotfish is allelic hold. sent18: there exists something such that it is not sensible. sent19: the opacification is insensible. sent20: there exists something such that it is acetic. sent21: that the sorehead is insensible is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent16 & sent12 -> int1: the Lotus is allelic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that either the sire is not a kind of a racehorse or it is utopian or both is not false. | (¬{B}{b} v {C}{b}) | sent1: something does not lunge wooded and does repress orientalist. sent2: if the phenylpropanolamine is not lunar then the sire is not a racehorse. sent3: the fact that the troposphere is utopian does not hold if that that the phenylpropanolamine is lunar and it is utopian is not true hold. | sent1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{ah} | []
| []
| the troposphere is not utopian. | ¬{C}{ah} | []
| 6 | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that either the sire is not a kind of a racehorse or it is utopian or both is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not lunge wooded and does repress orientalist. sent2: if the phenylpropanolamine is not lunar then the sire is not a racehorse. sent3: the fact that the troposphere is utopian does not hold if that that the phenylpropanolamine is lunar and it is utopian is not true hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the pricket is not paranormal. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the pricket is a Sacco if the dyspeptic is not non-paranormal. sent2: the pricket does smile size. sent3: the pricket is paranormal if the dyspeptic is a Sacco. sent4: if the queen does not urinate and is eutrophic the jejunum is eutrophic. sent5: if something is geocentric that it is either not a Sacco or not comic or both is not correct. sent6: the dyspeptic is paranormal. sent7: the dyspeptic is geocentric if the fact that it is both not geocentric and unborn is not correct. sent8: that the fact that the dyspeptic is paranormal hold if the pricket is a kind of a Sacco hold. sent9: the pricket is a decapitation. sent10: that the dyspeptic is not geocentric and is unborn is wrong if the jejunum is eutrophic. sent11: the dyspeptic is a Sacco. sent12: the domicile is a Sacco. | sent1: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent2: {GM}{b} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent4: (¬{G}{d} & {F}{d}) -> {F}{c} sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) sent6: {B}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> {D}{a} sent8: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent9: {H}{b} sent10: {F}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent11: {A}{a} sent12: {A}{bt} | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the pricket is not paranormal. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int1: if the dyspeptic is geocentric then that it is not a Sacco and/or it is not comic is wrong.;"
]
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pricket is not paranormal. ; $context$ = sent1: the pricket is a Sacco if the dyspeptic is not non-paranormal. sent2: the pricket does smile size. sent3: the pricket is paranormal if the dyspeptic is a Sacco. sent4: if the queen does not urinate and is eutrophic the jejunum is eutrophic. sent5: if something is geocentric that it is either not a Sacco or not comic or both is not correct. sent6: the dyspeptic is paranormal. sent7: the dyspeptic is geocentric if the fact that it is both not geocentric and unborn is not correct. sent8: that the fact that the dyspeptic is paranormal hold if the pricket is a kind of a Sacco hold. sent9: the pricket is a decapitation. sent10: that the dyspeptic is not geocentric and is unborn is wrong if the jejunum is eutrophic. sent11: the dyspeptic is a Sacco. sent12: the domicile is a Sacco. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is not macaronic and it purples then it does buzz drawknife. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-pacific a cutting then it is concessive. sent2: there is something such that if it is metastable and teeters then it represses whiting. sent3: there is something such that if it is heavy-duty and a Wac it is a salesperson. sent4: there is something such that if it is non-low-interest and does repress swaggerer it buzzes genuineness. sent5: something buzzes wooded if it is a kind of concessive thing that doubles. sent6: if the Javanthropus is a kind of macaronic thing that purples then it does buzz drawknife. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a muzzler and honeys it does oxidise. sent8: that something is a double hold if that it is not a kind of a worthy and it is a Icelandic is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is a Haggadah and it begs then it does twig. sent10: the pilot does buzz wooded if it does not lunge salvager and is macaronic. sent11: something is a kind of a topiary if it is a parade and twigs. sent12: if something is not vacuolate and represses grater then it is paramedical. sent13: the fact that the Javanthropus lunges self-aggrandizement is not incorrect if that it does not buzz Saba and is macaronic hold. | sent1: (Ex): (¬{BH}x & {ER}x) -> {IN}x sent2: (Ex): ({BF}x & {EE}x) -> {BR}x sent3: (Ex): ({DJ}x & {N}x) -> {HE}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{ED}x & {AR}x) -> {BS}x sent5: (x): ({IN}x & {DG}x) -> {IE}x sent6: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent7: (Ex): (¬{S}x & {IL}x) -> {T}x sent8: (x): (¬{BG}x & {HM}x) -> {DG}x sent9: (Ex): ({GB}x & {BQ}x) -> {CT}x sent10: (¬{BO}{bo} & {AA}{bo}) -> {IE}{bo} sent11: (x): ({CB}x & {CT}x) -> {I}x sent12: (x): (¬{CN}x & {CA}x) -> {CU}x sent13: (¬{CM}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> {CQ}{aa} | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not macaronic and it purples then it does buzz drawknife. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-pacific a cutting then it is concessive. sent2: there is something such that if it is metastable and teeters then it represses whiting. sent3: there is something such that if it is heavy-duty and a Wac it is a salesperson. sent4: there is something such that if it is non-low-interest and does repress swaggerer it buzzes genuineness. sent5: something buzzes wooded if it is a kind of concessive thing that doubles. sent6: if the Javanthropus is a kind of macaronic thing that purples then it does buzz drawknife. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a muzzler and honeys it does oxidise. sent8: that something is a double hold if that it is not a kind of a worthy and it is a Icelandic is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is a Haggadah and it begs then it does twig. sent10: the pilot does buzz wooded if it does not lunge salvager and is macaronic. sent11: something is a kind of a topiary if it is a parade and twigs. sent12: if something is not vacuolate and represses grater then it is paramedical. sent13: the fact that the Javanthropus lunges self-aggrandizement is not incorrect if that it does not buzz Saba and is macaronic hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the donna is a lesbian. | {C}{b} | sent1: the fact that if the gazania is not bivalve the gazania is not narial and it does not lunge mudskipper is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the blow is not a bivalve and/or is instrumental is not true the gazania is not a kind of a bivalve. sent3: if something does lunge mudskipper then the donna is not a lesbian. sent4: something is a lesbian if it does buzz forelock. sent5: The forelock does not buzz gazania. sent6: the gazania does not buzz forelock. sent7: the gazania lunges mudskipper if it does not buzz forelock. sent8: if there exists something such that it buzzes forelock then the gazania does not lunge mudskipper. | sent1: ¬{E}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent2: ¬(¬{E}{c} v {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent3: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}{b} sent4: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent5: ¬{AA}{aa} sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the gazania does lunge mudskipper.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does lunge mudskipper.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): {B}x; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the donna is a lesbian. | {C}{b} | [
"sent4 -> int3: the donna is a lesbian if that it buzzes forelock is not false.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the donna is a lesbian. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the gazania is not bivalve the gazania is not narial and it does not lunge mudskipper is not incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the blow is not a bivalve and/or is instrumental is not true the gazania is not a kind of a bivalve. sent3: if something does lunge mudskipper then the donna is not a lesbian. sent4: something is a lesbian if it does buzz forelock. sent5: The forelock does not buzz gazania. sent6: the gazania does not buzz forelock. sent7: the gazania lunges mudskipper if it does not buzz forelock. sent8: if there exists something such that it buzzes forelock then the gazania does not lunge mudskipper. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the gazania does lunge mudskipper.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does lunge mudskipper.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the queen is allergic. | {E}{c} | sent1: the parsnip does lunge devices if it is a kind of an ultraviolet. sent2: the weightlifter is hypodermal. sent3: if something lunges devices then the gloxinia does repress weightlifter and/or it is hypodermal. sent4: if something that is not an ultraviolet does not lunge devices it is not allergic. sent5: the queen is hypodermal. sent6: the fact that the queen is chemiluminescent is correct. sent7: if the parsnip is hypodermal the gloxinia is an ultraviolet. sent8: if that the gloxinia does repress weightlifter hold the queen is allergic. sent9: the queen is allergic if the fact that the gloxinia is hypodermal is right. | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent2: {D}{at} sent3: (x): {B}x -> ({C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent4: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{E}x sent5: {D}{c} sent6: {GB}{c} sent7: {D}{a} -> {A}{b} sent8: {C}{b} -> {E}{c} sent9: {D}{b} -> {E}{c} | []
| []
| the queen is not allergic. | ¬{E}{c} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the queen is not allergic if it is not an ultraviolet and it does not lunge devices.;"
]
| 4 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the queen is allergic. ; $context$ = sent1: the parsnip does lunge devices if it is a kind of an ultraviolet. sent2: the weightlifter is hypodermal. sent3: if something lunges devices then the gloxinia does repress weightlifter and/or it is hypodermal. sent4: if something that is not an ultraviolet does not lunge devices it is not allergic. sent5: the queen is hypodermal. sent6: the fact that the queen is chemiluminescent is correct. sent7: if the parsnip is hypodermal the gloxinia is an ultraviolet. sent8: if that the gloxinia does repress weightlifter hold the queen is allergic. sent9: the queen is allergic if the fact that the gloxinia is hypodermal is right. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Markovianness does not occur and the closuring does not occur. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: that the whammy does not occur and the Gandhianness occurs is wrong if that the oppression occurs is right. sent2: the fact that the Markovianness does not occur and the closure does not occur is wrong if the oppression does not occur. sent3: the oppression does not occur. sent4: the Gandhianness does not occur if the fact that not the whammy but the Gandhianness happens is false. sent5: that the Markovianness does not occur but the closure happens is wrong. sent6: the fact that the pentavalentness does not occur and the playback does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the Markovianness does not occur and the closuring does not occur if the oppression happens. sent8: the fact that the Markovianness does not occur but the closuring occurs does not hold if the oppression does not occur. sent9: the mutter does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Markovianness but not the closuring occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the oppression does not occur then the fact that the Markovianness occurs but the closure does not occur is not true. | sent1: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {BG}) sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: ¬{A} sent4: ¬(¬{B} & {BG}) -> ¬{BG} sent5: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent6: ¬(¬{JJ} & ¬{GJ}) sent7: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent8: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent9: ¬{AP} sent10: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent11: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Gandhianness does not occur. | ¬{BG} | []
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Markovianness does not occur and the closuring does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the whammy does not occur and the Gandhianness occurs is wrong if that the oppression occurs is right. sent2: the fact that the Markovianness does not occur and the closure does not occur is wrong if the oppression does not occur. sent3: the oppression does not occur. sent4: the Gandhianness does not occur if the fact that not the whammy but the Gandhianness happens is false. sent5: that the Markovianness does not occur but the closure happens is wrong. sent6: the fact that the pentavalentness does not occur and the playback does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the Markovianness does not occur and the closuring does not occur if the oppression happens. sent8: the fact that the Markovianness does not occur but the closuring occurs does not hold if the oppression does not occur. sent9: the mutter does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Markovianness but not the closuring occurs is incorrect. sent11: if the oppression does not occur then the fact that the Markovianness occurs but the closure does not occur is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the hexane is not unfrozen. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: if the stork is not a eremite but it is soluble then the hexane is unfrozen. sent2: the putamen is unfrozen. sent3: the hexane is a Haggadah. sent4: the wringer is unfrozen. sent5: the fact that the manic-depressive does not buzz disenchantment is not wrong. sent6: the stork is soluble if the hexane is not a eremite but it is unfrozen. sent7: if something is a bimillennium then it is a Shivaism. sent8: the hexane is soluble if the stork is not a kind of a eremite but it is unfrozen. sent9: the groover is not inconsiderable but a eremite. sent10: if the fact that something does not buzz ammonium and/or it is not a Mesozoic is not right then it is a bimillennium. sent11: if the stork is both unfrozen and a hand then the hexane is not unfrozen. sent12: the stork is soluble. sent13: the hexane is a eremite. sent14: that the synchroscope does not buzz ammonium and/or it is not a kind of a Mesozoic is false if the rule does repress synchroscope. sent15: the stork is not unfrozen and is soluble. sent16: the Sporozoa either is not a hand or is not a formal or both if the synchroscope is a Shivaism. sent17: the stork is not a eremite but it is soluble. sent18: the manic-depressive is not valuable but it is blastocoelic if it does not buzz disenchantment. | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: {B}{in} sent3: {DN}{b} sent4: {B}{bh} sent5: ¬{K}{f} sent6: (¬{AA}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {AB}{a} sent7: (x): {E}x -> {C}x sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {AB}{b} sent9: (¬{AJ}{r} & {AA}{r}) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{F}x v ¬{G}x) -> {E}x sent11: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent12: {AB}{a} sent13: {AA}{b} sent14: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{F}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) sent15: (¬{B}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent16: {C}{d} -> (¬{A}{c} v ¬{D}{c}) sent17: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent18: ¬{K}{f} -> (¬{J}{f} & {I}{f}) | [
"sent1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the hexane is not unfrozen. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int1: if the synchroscope is a bimillennium it is a Shivaism.; sent10 -> int2: the synchroscope is a bimillennium if that it does not buzz ammonium and/or it is not a Mesozoic is incorrect.; sent18 & sent5 -> int3: the manic-depressive is not a kind of a valuable but it is blastocoelic.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a valuable and it is blastocoelic.;"
]
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the hexane is not unfrozen. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stork is not a eremite but it is soluble then the hexane is unfrozen. sent2: the putamen is unfrozen. sent3: the hexane is a Haggadah. sent4: the wringer is unfrozen. sent5: the fact that the manic-depressive does not buzz disenchantment is not wrong. sent6: the stork is soluble if the hexane is not a eremite but it is unfrozen. sent7: if something is a bimillennium then it is a Shivaism. sent8: the hexane is soluble if the stork is not a kind of a eremite but it is unfrozen. sent9: the groover is not inconsiderable but a eremite. sent10: if the fact that something does not buzz ammonium and/or it is not a Mesozoic is not right then it is a bimillennium. sent11: if the stork is both unfrozen and a hand then the hexane is not unfrozen. sent12: the stork is soluble. sent13: the hexane is a eremite. sent14: that the synchroscope does not buzz ammonium and/or it is not a kind of a Mesozoic is false if the rule does repress synchroscope. sent15: the stork is not unfrozen and is soluble. sent16: the Sporozoa either is not a hand or is not a formal or both if the synchroscope is a Shivaism. sent17: the stork is not a eremite but it is soluble. sent18: the manic-depressive is not valuable but it is blastocoelic if it does not buzz disenchantment. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fatherland is not a kind of a pop. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: the coachbuilder does not buzz thimble if something is not anecdotal or it does mope or both. sent2: that something is chronological but it is not a ministrant is not correct if it does buzz thimble. sent3: the fatherland does not adapt but it is a reassembly. sent4: the toadshade is not chronological and is not a ministrant if there exists something such that it does not buzz thimble. sent5: the stillroom is a kind of a bowing that is amenorrheic. sent6: the edge is a kind of a pop. sent7: there is nothing such that it is anecdotal thing that does not buzz thimble. sent8: if the action lunges proselytism then the graduate is not anecdotal and/or does mope. sent9: the saran is both not a fix and a ministrant. sent10: the fatherland is not a ministrant. sent11: the fatherland is a kind of a furrow. sent12: if the stillroom does bow the fact that it is not rotational and/or it articulates is false. sent13: the stillroom does not buzz diaphragm and smiles vernier. sent14: the fact that the fatherland does not embower but it does buzz diaphragm is not wrong. sent15: if the fact that the stillroom either is not rotational or is articulate or both is incorrect the wimp is not a kind of a liberal. sent16: the action lunges proselytism but it is not guilty if the wimp is not a liberal. sent17: the fatherland is both not a ministrant and a pop. | sent1: (x): (¬{F}x v {E}x) -> ¬{D}{c} sent2: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) sent3: (¬{JK}{a} & {EM}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent5: ({L}{g} & {M}{g}) sent6: {B}{jk} sent7: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent8: {G}{e} -> (¬{F}{d} v {E}{d}) sent9: (¬{CT}{r} & {A}{r}) sent10: ¬{A}{a} sent11: {CJ}{a} sent12: {L}{g} -> ¬(¬{K}{g} v {J}{g}) sent13: (¬{FE}{g} & {R}{g}) sent14: (¬{EK}{a} & {FE}{a}) sent15: ¬(¬{K}{g} v {J}{g}) -> ¬{I}{f} sent16: ¬{I}{f} -> ({G}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) sent17: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fatherland is not a kind of a pop. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent5 -> int1: the stillroom bows.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: that the stillroom is not rotational and/or it does articulate is not right.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the wimp is not a kind of a liberal.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the action lunges proselytism but it is not guilty.; int4 -> int5: the action lunges proselytism.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the graduate is not anecdotal and/or it does mope.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not anecdotal or mopes or both.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the coachbuilder does not buzz thimble.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it does not buzz thimble is true.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the toadshade is not chronological and it is not a ministrant.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-chronological thing that is not a ministrant.;"
]
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fatherland is not a kind of a pop. ; $context$ = sent1: the coachbuilder does not buzz thimble if something is not anecdotal or it does mope or both. sent2: that something is chronological but it is not a ministrant is not correct if it does buzz thimble. sent3: the fatherland does not adapt but it is a reassembly. sent4: the toadshade is not chronological and is not a ministrant if there exists something such that it does not buzz thimble. sent5: the stillroom is a kind of a bowing that is amenorrheic. sent6: the edge is a kind of a pop. sent7: there is nothing such that it is anecdotal thing that does not buzz thimble. sent8: if the action lunges proselytism then the graduate is not anecdotal and/or does mope. sent9: the saran is both not a fix and a ministrant. sent10: the fatherland is not a ministrant. sent11: the fatherland is a kind of a furrow. sent12: if the stillroom does bow the fact that it is not rotational and/or it articulates is false. sent13: the stillroom does not buzz diaphragm and smiles vernier. sent14: the fact that the fatherland does not embower but it does buzz diaphragm is not wrong. sent15: if the fact that the stillroom either is not rotational or is articulate or both is incorrect the wimp is not a kind of a liberal. sent16: the action lunges proselytism but it is not guilty if the wimp is not a liberal. sent17: the fatherland is both not a ministrant and a pop. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the churchyard is a kind of a cancellation. | {B}{b} | sent1: the gunlock is not a finality. sent2: the churchyard is not a diamante if the gunlock is a locator. sent3: if the churchyard is a diamante the gunlock is not a kind of a locator. sent4: if that the gunlock is a kind of a sow and is not dumpy is wrong then the churchyard is a cancellation. sent5: if that the churchyard is both not a diamante and not a locator is not true the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent6: if that that the churchyard is not a locator and is not a diamante is wrong is correct the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent7: if the fact that the sapphirine is a use that does not adjoin is not right then the acquaintance does adjoin. sent8: if the fact that the gunlock is not a cancellation and it is not a kind of a locator does not hold the churchyard is not a diamante. sent9: the gunlock is not a gamine and it is not a kind of a sconce if the acquaintance does adjoin. sent10: that the gunlock is not a locator and it is not a diamante is wrong. sent11: the fact that the gunlock is not a locator but a cancellation is wrong. sent12: the pasty is not a locator. sent13: if the fact that the gunlock is not a locator and not a diamante is not right the churchyard is not a cancellation. sent14: if the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a diamante is not wrong the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent15: the churchyard is not a cancellation if the gunlock is a diamante. sent16: the fact that the gunlock is not a cancellation but it is a diamante is not correct. sent17: that the gunlock is not a cancellation if the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a locator hold is correct. sent18: if something is not a kind of a sconce the fact that it is both a sow and not dumpy is incorrect. sent19: that the gunlock is not a kind of a diamante is not false if the churchyard is a kind of a locator. sent20: that the gunlock is not a kind of a cancellation but it is a locator is not true. sent21: if the snip is not a Stoker the fact that the sapphirine does use but it does not adjoin is not true. | sent1: ¬{I}{a} sent2: {AA}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent3: {AB}{b} -> ¬{AA}{a} sent4: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent5: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: ¬({G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {F}{c} sent8: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} sent9: {F}{c} -> (¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent11: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {B}{a}) sent12: ¬{AA}{ck} sent13: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent14: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent15: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent16: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent17: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent18: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) sent19: {AA}{b} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent20: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent21: ¬{H}{e} -> ¬({G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) | [
"sent13 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the churchyard is a cancellation. | {B}{b} | [
"sent18 -> int1: the fact that the gunlock is both a sow and not dumpy is false if it is not a sconce.;"
]
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the churchyard is a kind of a cancellation. ; $context$ = sent1: the gunlock is not a finality. sent2: the churchyard is not a diamante if the gunlock is a locator. sent3: if the churchyard is a diamante the gunlock is not a kind of a locator. sent4: if that the gunlock is a kind of a sow and is not dumpy is wrong then the churchyard is a cancellation. sent5: if that the churchyard is both not a diamante and not a locator is not true the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent6: if that that the churchyard is not a locator and is not a diamante is wrong is correct the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent7: if the fact that the sapphirine is a use that does not adjoin is not right then the acquaintance does adjoin. sent8: if the fact that the gunlock is not a cancellation and it is not a kind of a locator does not hold the churchyard is not a diamante. sent9: the gunlock is not a gamine and it is not a kind of a sconce if the acquaintance does adjoin. sent10: that the gunlock is not a locator and it is not a diamante is wrong. sent11: the fact that the gunlock is not a locator but a cancellation is wrong. sent12: the pasty is not a locator. sent13: if the fact that the gunlock is not a locator and not a diamante is not right the churchyard is not a cancellation. sent14: if the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a diamante is not wrong the gunlock is not a cancellation. sent15: the churchyard is not a cancellation if the gunlock is a diamante. sent16: the fact that the gunlock is not a cancellation but it is a diamante is not correct. sent17: that the gunlock is not a cancellation if the fact that the churchyard is a kind of a locator hold is correct. sent18: if something is not a kind of a sconce the fact that it is both a sow and not dumpy is incorrect. sent19: that the gunlock is not a kind of a diamante is not false if the churchyard is a kind of a locator. sent20: that the gunlock is not a kind of a cancellation but it is a locator is not true. sent21: if the snip is not a Stoker the fact that the sapphirine does use but it does not adjoin is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent13 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the warplane buzzes sympathy. | {A}{a} | sent1: if the warplane buzzes sympathy it buzzes massage. sent2: the warplane does not buzz massage if something is vacuolate and/or smiles beneficed. sent3: the leaf does not smile beneficed and it is not toneless if it is a wedge. sent4: if there is something such that it does smile beneficed the warplane does not buzz massage. sent5: something is vacuolate and/or it smiles beneficed. | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent2: (x): ({C}x v {D}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: {F}{c} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: (Ex): ({C}x v {D}x) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the warplane does buzz sympathy.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the warplane buzzes massage.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the warplane does not buzz massage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the warplane does buzz sympathy. | {A}{a} | []
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the warplane buzzes sympathy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the warplane buzzes sympathy it buzzes massage. sent2: the warplane does not buzz massage if something is vacuolate and/or smiles beneficed. sent3: the leaf does not smile beneficed and it is not toneless if it is a wedge. sent4: if there is something such that it does smile beneficed the warplane does not buzz massage. sent5: something is vacuolate and/or it smiles beneficed. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the warplane does buzz sympathy.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the warplane buzzes massage.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the warplane does not buzz massage.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the feeder is a Priapus. | {A}{a} | sent1: the feeder is a Priapus if there exists something such that either it is not suctorial or it is two-dimensional or both. sent2: the feeder buzzes scorekeeper. sent3: if either something does buzz trade-last or it is polyhedral or both then it is not a monocle. sent4: something is not suctorial and/or is two-dimensional. sent5: if there exists something such that either it does not buzz Ornithischia or it smiles ceratosaur or both then the feeder is two-dimensional. sent6: the symphysis does lunge feeder and is a Priapus if the Mahdist is not a kind of a monocle. sent7: the fact that something is suctorial and/or not non-two-dimensional is not incorrect. sent8: the Mahdist buzzes trade-last. sent9: the feeder is a Priapus if there is something such that it is two-dimensional. sent10: there is something such that it is not a braille or it is peroneal or both. | sent1: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent2: {GK}{a} sent3: (x): ({E}x v {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent5: (x): (¬{GN}x v {FI}x) -> {AB}{a} sent6: ¬{C}{c} -> ({DE}{b} & {A}{b}) sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent8: {E}{c} sent9: (x): {AB}x -> {A}{a} sent10: (Ex): (¬{IP}x v {EE}x) | [
"sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the feeder does lunge feeder. | {DE}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int1: if either the Mahdist does buzz trade-last or it is polyhedral or both it is not a monocle.; sent8 -> int2: the Mahdist buzzes trade-last or it is polyhedral or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Mahdist is not a kind of a monocle.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the symphysis lunges feeder and is a Priapus.; int4 -> int5: the symphysis does lunge feeder.; int5 -> int6: the symphysis is a kind of a furring or it lunges feeder or both.; int6 -> int7: something is a furring and/or lunges feeder.;"
]
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the feeder is a Priapus. ; $context$ = sent1: the feeder is a Priapus if there exists something such that either it is not suctorial or it is two-dimensional or both. sent2: the feeder buzzes scorekeeper. sent3: if either something does buzz trade-last or it is polyhedral or both then it is not a monocle. sent4: something is not suctorial and/or is two-dimensional. sent5: if there exists something such that either it does not buzz Ornithischia or it smiles ceratosaur or both then the feeder is two-dimensional. sent6: the symphysis does lunge feeder and is a Priapus if the Mahdist is not a kind of a monocle. sent7: the fact that something is suctorial and/or not non-two-dimensional is not incorrect. sent8: the Mahdist buzzes trade-last. sent9: the feeder is a Priapus if there is something such that it is two-dimensional. sent10: there is something such that it is not a braille or it is peroneal or both. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the detox is not a kind of an inequality and does repress gaff is not right. | ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: the fact that the gasohol does not revalue and it is not a riot is not correct if there exists something such that it is a kind of a riot. sent2: there is nothing such that it is not a stripe and/or it is non-bioclimatic. sent3: the medroxyprogesterone is not a flogger if the fact that the packet is a basket that is not a kind of a flogger is wrong. sent4: if something is not a flogger it is both a tank and a Todd. sent5: if there is something such that it is a stair-carpet then the fact that the gaff is not a kind of a stair-carpet and it is not a riot is not true. sent6: the gasohol does not repress Coereba if the fact that it does not revalue and is not a riot does not hold. sent7: if something is a kind of an inequality then it is a stripe. sent8: the packet is not a aphagia. sent9: something that represses Hubel represses gaff. sent10: the firewall is a kind of a riot if that the gaff is not a kind of a stair-carpet and is not a riot is not right. sent11: if the maleate stripes the detox is a stripes. sent12: the maleate is gastronomic. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does repress Hubel and is gastronomic does not hold the maleate does not repress Hubel. sent14: if that something is not a stair-carpet and smooches does not hold it is a stair-carpet. sent15: that the packet is a basket and not a flogger is incorrect if that it is not a aphagia is right. sent16: the detox does repress Coereba. sent17: the detox is not an inequality if that the reedbird does not stripe or it is not bioclimatic or both does not hold. sent18: the detox is not a kind of an inequality if that the reedbird is not a kind of a stripe and/or it is bioclimatic is false. sent19: the reedbird is bioclimatic. sent20: if something represses couple the fact that it is not a kind of a stair-carpet and it smooches is not right. sent21: if the maleate is gastronomic it represses Coereba and it does not repress Hubel. sent22: if the medroxyprogesterone is a Todd then the belemnite does repress couple. sent23: The Coereba does repress detox. sent24: the detox represses Hubel if the fact that it represses Coereba is not incorrect. sent25: the fact that that something represses Hubel and it is gastronomic is true does not hold if it does not repress Coereba. sent26: everything is bioclimatic. | sent1: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{G}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: ¬({O}{h} & ¬{M}{h}) -> ¬{M}{g} sent4: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({L}x & {K}x) sent5: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{H}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) sent6: ¬(¬{G}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent7: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x sent8: ¬{N}{h} sent9: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent10: ¬(¬{H}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) -> {F}{d} sent11: {AA}{b} -> {AA}{a} sent12: {E}{b} sent13: (x): ¬({C}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {J}x) -> {H}x sent15: ¬{N}{h} -> ¬({O}{h} & ¬{M}{h}) sent16: {D}{a} sent17: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent19: {AB}{aa} sent20: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {J}x) sent21: {E}{b} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent22: {K}{g} -> {I}{f} sent23: {AE}{ad} sent24: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} sent25: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & {E}x) sent26: (x): {AB}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the reedbird does not stripe and/or it is not bioclimatic is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the detox is not an inequality.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the detox does repress Hubel is right it represses gaff.; sent24 & sent16 -> int4: the detox does repress Hubel.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the detox represses gaff.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; sent9 -> int3: {C}{a} -> {B}{a}; sent24 & sent16 -> int4: {C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> int5: {B}{a}; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the detox is not an inequality but it does repress gaff is false. | ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent25 -> int6: if the gasohol does not repress Coereba that that it does repress Hubel and is gastronomic is correct does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: if that the belemnite is not a stair-carpet but it does smooch does not hold that it is a stair-carpet is correct.; sent20 -> int8: if the belemnite represses couple then that it is not a stair-carpet and does smooch is not true.; sent4 -> int9: the medroxyprogesterone does tank and it is a Todd if it is not a kind of a flogger.; sent15 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that that the packet is a basket and is not a flogger is not correct is not incorrect.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the medroxyprogesterone is not a flogger.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the medroxyprogesterone is a tank and it is a kind of a Todd.; int12 -> int13: the medroxyprogesterone is a Todd.; sent22 & int13 -> int14: the belemnite does repress couple.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the belemnite is not a kind of a stair-carpet but it smooches does not hold.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the belemnite is a kind of a stair-carpet.; int16 -> int17: something is a stair-carpet.; int17 & sent5 -> int18: the fact that the gaff is not a stair-carpet and it is not a kind of a riot is false.; sent10 & int18 -> int19: the firewall riots.; int19 -> int20: something riots.; int20 & sent1 -> int21: the fact that the gasohol does not revalue and it is not a riot is wrong.; sent6 & int21 -> int22: the gasohol does not repress Coereba.; int6 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the gasohol represses Hubel and it is gastronomic does not hold.; int23 -> int24: there exists something such that that it represses Hubel and it is gastronomic is not true.; int24 & sent13 -> int25: the maleate does not repress Hubel.; int25 -> int26: something does not repress Hubel.;"
]
| 18 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the detox is not a kind of an inequality and does repress gaff is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gasohol does not revalue and it is not a riot is not correct if there exists something such that it is a kind of a riot. sent2: there is nothing such that it is not a stripe and/or it is non-bioclimatic. sent3: the medroxyprogesterone is not a flogger if the fact that the packet is a basket that is not a kind of a flogger is wrong. sent4: if something is not a flogger it is both a tank and a Todd. sent5: if there is something such that it is a stair-carpet then the fact that the gaff is not a kind of a stair-carpet and it is not a riot is not true. sent6: the gasohol does not repress Coereba if the fact that it does not revalue and is not a riot does not hold. sent7: if something is a kind of an inequality then it is a stripe. sent8: the packet is not a aphagia. sent9: something that represses Hubel represses gaff. sent10: the firewall is a kind of a riot if that the gaff is not a kind of a stair-carpet and is not a riot is not right. sent11: if the maleate stripes the detox is a stripes. sent12: the maleate is gastronomic. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does repress Hubel and is gastronomic does not hold the maleate does not repress Hubel. sent14: if that something is not a stair-carpet and smooches does not hold it is a stair-carpet. sent15: that the packet is a basket and not a flogger is incorrect if that it is not a aphagia is right. sent16: the detox does repress Coereba. sent17: the detox is not an inequality if that the reedbird does not stripe or it is not bioclimatic or both does not hold. sent18: the detox is not a kind of an inequality if that the reedbird is not a kind of a stripe and/or it is bioclimatic is false. sent19: the reedbird is bioclimatic. sent20: if something represses couple the fact that it is not a kind of a stair-carpet and it smooches is not right. sent21: if the maleate is gastronomic it represses Coereba and it does not repress Hubel. sent22: if the medroxyprogesterone is a Todd then the belemnite does repress couple. sent23: The Coereba does repress detox. sent24: the detox represses Hubel if the fact that it represses Coereba is not incorrect. sent25: the fact that that something represses Hubel and it is gastronomic is true does not hold if it does not repress Coereba. sent26: everything is bioclimatic. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: that the reedbird does not stripe and/or it is not bioclimatic is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the detox is not an inequality.; sent9 -> int3: if the fact that the detox does repress Hubel is right it represses gaff.; sent24 & sent16 -> int4: the detox does repress Hubel.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the detox represses gaff.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the catechism happens is true. | {B} | sent1: the nodularness does not occur and the catechism does not occur if the lunging sour does not occur. sent2: the repressing distribution does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the homogenization does not occur is right the euclidianness occurs. sent4: if that the quarantine does not occur or the seniorness occurs or both is false then the fact that the lunging sour does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the lunging star-thistle happens if the interstellarness does not occur. sent6: the smiling productivity does not occur. sent7: the buzzing Theban does not occur. sent8: that the catechism does not occur is prevented by that the nodularness does not occur. sent9: if not the buzzing Theban but the repressing needle occurs the fact that the prizefighting does not occur is correct. sent10: that the prizefighting does not occur results in that either the flit or the spitball or both happens. sent11: the fact that the gin happens is not incorrect if that the subduralness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: if the amnioticness does not occur then the faucalness happens. sent13: the Michigan does not occur. sent14: if that the corruption does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the smiling productivity happens is not incorrect. sent15: if the homogenization does not occur the fact that the quarantining does not occur or the senior happens or both does not hold. sent16: the homogenization does not occur if the shear occurs and the chronicness happens. sent17: the fact that the braggadocio happens is right. sent18: the smiling dinoflagellate occurs if the celebratoriness does not occur. sent19: the repressing animism does not occur. sent20: the nodularness does not occur. | sent1: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent2: ¬{FR} sent3: ¬{F} -> {DB} sent4: ¬(¬{E} v {D}) -> ¬{C} sent5: ¬{JJ} -> {DS} sent6: ¬{DC} sent7: ¬{M} sent8: ¬{A} -> {B} sent9: (¬{M} & {N}) -> ¬{L} sent10: ¬{L} -> ({K} v {J}) sent11: ¬{EB} -> {T} sent12: ¬{JI} -> {BK} sent13: ¬{ET} sent14: ¬{FU} -> {DC} sent15: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} v {D}) sent16: ({G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} sent17: {CK} sent18: ¬{JD} -> {JB} sent19: ¬{IL} sent20: ¬{A} | [
"sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the catechism does not occur. | ¬{B} | []
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the catechism happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the nodularness does not occur and the catechism does not occur if the lunging sour does not occur. sent2: the repressing distribution does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the homogenization does not occur is right the euclidianness occurs. sent4: if that the quarantine does not occur or the seniorness occurs or both is false then the fact that the lunging sour does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the lunging star-thistle happens if the interstellarness does not occur. sent6: the smiling productivity does not occur. sent7: the buzzing Theban does not occur. sent8: that the catechism does not occur is prevented by that the nodularness does not occur. sent9: if not the buzzing Theban but the repressing needle occurs the fact that the prizefighting does not occur is correct. sent10: that the prizefighting does not occur results in that either the flit or the spitball or both happens. sent11: the fact that the gin happens is not incorrect if that the subduralness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: if the amnioticness does not occur then the faucalness happens. sent13: the Michigan does not occur. sent14: if that the corruption does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the smiling productivity happens is not incorrect. sent15: if the homogenization does not occur the fact that the quarantining does not occur or the senior happens or both does not hold. sent16: the homogenization does not occur if the shear occurs and the chronicness happens. sent17: the fact that the braggadocio happens is right. sent18: the smiling dinoflagellate occurs if the celebratoriness does not occur. sent19: the repressing animism does not occur. sent20: the nodularness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the diesel is a kind of a echinococcus that does repress Wren. | ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: there is something such that it represses Wren and it is a echinococcus. sent2: something is precordial. sent3: the second-rater is a echinococcus. sent4: the diesel is a echinococcus if that something is precordial is correct. sent5: the diesel represses Wren if an inequality lunges infantryman. sent6: the buttocks is nonoperational. sent7: something is a echinococcus. | sent1: (Ex): ({C}x & {D}x) sent2: (Ex): {E}x sent3: {D}{ij} sent4: (x): {E}x -> {D}{a} sent5: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent6: {IF}{hm} sent7: (Ex): {D}x | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the diesel is a echinococcus.;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: {D}{a};"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the diesel is a kind of a echinococcus that does repress Wren. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it represses Wren and it is a echinococcus. sent2: something is precordial. sent3: the second-rater is a echinococcus. sent4: the diesel is a echinococcus if that something is precordial is correct. sent5: the diesel represses Wren if an inequality lunges infantryman. sent6: the buttocks is nonoperational. sent7: something is a echinococcus. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the diesel is a echinococcus.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there is something such that it lunges chlorella and is a cholangiography does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ({B}x & {C}x)) | sent1: something is a patina if it does lunge chlorella. sent2: the celandine is brotherly. sent3: if the fact that the celandine is a counteroffer but not offensive does not hold it is a cholangiography. sent4: the celandine is a patina and it does lunge chlorella. sent5: that the celandine is a kind of a counteroffer but it is not offensive is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the celandine buzzes bannock but it does not repress bookshelf is false it is a cholangiography. sent7: the cleric is offensive. sent8: there exists something such that it is offensive. sent9: the celandine is a patina. sent10: the edition does lunge chlorella. sent11: there exists something such that it lunges chlorella. sent12: the usance is a kind of a cholangiography. sent13: that the celandine is a counteroffer and offensive is incorrect. sent14: the corporation lunges chlorella if that the celandine is not a kind of a cholangiography and does lunges chlorella does not hold. | sent1: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent2: {L}{a} sent3: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> {C}{a} sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent6: ¬({FK}{a} & ¬{IL}{a}) -> {C}{a} sent7: {D}{eh} sent8: (Ex): {D}x sent9: {A}{a} sent10: {B}{eq} sent11: (Ex): {B}x sent12: {C}{g} sent13: ¬({E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {B}{ii} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the celandine lunges chlorella.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the celandine is a kind of a cholangiography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the celandine lunges chlorella and is a cholangiography is right.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the corporation is a patina. | {A}{ii} | [
"sent1 -> int4: if the corporation lunges chlorella then that it is a patina is not incorrect.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it lunges chlorella and is a cholangiography does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a patina if it does lunge chlorella. sent2: the celandine is brotherly. sent3: if the fact that the celandine is a counteroffer but not offensive does not hold it is a cholangiography. sent4: the celandine is a patina and it does lunge chlorella. sent5: that the celandine is a kind of a counteroffer but it is not offensive is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that the celandine buzzes bannock but it does not repress bookshelf is false it is a cholangiography. sent7: the cleric is offensive. sent8: there exists something such that it is offensive. sent9: the celandine is a patina. sent10: the edition does lunge chlorella. sent11: there exists something such that it lunges chlorella. sent12: the usance is a kind of a cholangiography. sent13: that the celandine is a counteroffer and offensive is incorrect. sent14: the corporation lunges chlorella if that the celandine is not a kind of a cholangiography and does lunges chlorella does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the celandine lunges chlorella.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the celandine is a kind of a cholangiography.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the celandine lunges chlorella and is a cholangiography is right.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the cross-stitch causes and does not lunge untruthfulness. | ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | sent1: the cross-stitch does not lunge untruthfulness. sent2: if something is not acneiform then that it is a kind of a causing and does not lunge untruthfulness is wrong. sent3: the uranium is a works that does not smile barograph. sent4: the pledgee causes but it is not a diastrophism. sent5: that the uranium is not a punt but it is a poxvirus does not hold if it is not a kind of a bid. sent6: the uranium represses pledgee but it is not a klutz. sent7: the uranium is acneiform. sent8: the cross-stitch is a kind of a Banff but it is not a banging. sent9: the hydrazoite causes. sent10: if something does buzz pancreatin then the uranium is not a bid. sent11: if something does not repress rotisserie it is not acneiform. sent12: if that the uranium is acneiform is not incorrect then it lunges untruthfulness. sent13: if the fact that the uranium lunges untruthfulness hold then the cross-stitch does not lunges untruthfulness. sent14: if that something does not punt but it is a poxvirus is not correct it is a kind of a Delichon. sent15: that the uranium lunges untruthfulness is not false if it causes. sent16: the uranium is euphonic but it does not lunge grater. sent17: the uranium does buzz haircut. sent18: the cross-stitch is a causing that does not lunge untruthfulness if the uranium lunge untruthfulness. sent19: the uranium does circularize but it is not a Peabody. sent20: the fact that something does not establish and it does not repress ezo-yama-hagi does not hold if it is a Delichon. sent21: something does buzz pancreatin. | sent1: ¬{B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{B}x) sent3: ({ER}{a} & ¬{FE}{a}) sent4: ({D}{iq} & ¬{EU}{iq}) sent5: ¬{J}{a} -> ¬(¬{H}{a} & {I}{a}) sent6: ({BJ}{a} & ¬{FL}{a}) sent7: {A}{a} sent8: ({FI}{b} & ¬{AC}{b}) sent9: {D}{du} sent10: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{A}x sent12: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent13: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent14: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> {G}x sent15: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent16: ({GB}{a} & ¬{FB}{a}) sent17: {GJ}{a} sent18: {B}{a} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent19: ({DR}{a} & ¬{IA}{a}) sent20: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) sent21: (Ex): {K}x | [
"sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the uranium does lunge untruthfulness.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent12 & sent7 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the cross-stitch is a kind of a causing and does not lunge untruthfulness is incorrect. | ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"sent2 -> int2: that the cross-stitch does cause but it does not lunge untruthfulness is false if it is not acneiform.; sent11 -> int3: if the cross-stitch does not repress rotisserie then it is not acneiform.; sent20 -> int4: if the uranium is a Delichon the fact that it does not establish and does not repress ezo-yama-hagi does not hold.; sent14 -> int5: that the uranium is a Delichon hold if the fact that it does not punt and it is a poxvirus is wrong.; sent21 & sent10 -> int6: the uranium is not a bid.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the uranium is not a punt and is a poxvirus does not hold.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the uranium is a Delichon.; int4 & int8 -> int9: that the uranium does not establish and does not repress ezo-yama-hagi is incorrect.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it does not establish and it does not repress ezo-yama-hagi is not true.;"
]
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cross-stitch causes and does not lunge untruthfulness. ; $context$ = sent1: the cross-stitch does not lunge untruthfulness. sent2: if something is not acneiform then that it is a kind of a causing and does not lunge untruthfulness is wrong. sent3: the uranium is a works that does not smile barograph. sent4: the pledgee causes but it is not a diastrophism. sent5: that the uranium is not a punt but it is a poxvirus does not hold if it is not a kind of a bid. sent6: the uranium represses pledgee but it is not a klutz. sent7: the uranium is acneiform. sent8: the cross-stitch is a kind of a Banff but it is not a banging. sent9: the hydrazoite causes. sent10: if something does buzz pancreatin then the uranium is not a bid. sent11: if something does not repress rotisserie it is not acneiform. sent12: if that the uranium is acneiform is not incorrect then it lunges untruthfulness. sent13: if the fact that the uranium lunges untruthfulness hold then the cross-stitch does not lunges untruthfulness. sent14: if that something does not punt but it is a poxvirus is not correct it is a kind of a Delichon. sent15: that the uranium lunges untruthfulness is not false if it causes. sent16: the uranium is euphonic but it does not lunge grater. sent17: the uranium does buzz haircut. sent18: the cross-stitch is a causing that does not lunge untruthfulness if the uranium lunge untruthfulness. sent19: the uranium does circularize but it is not a Peabody. sent20: the fact that something does not establish and it does not repress ezo-yama-hagi does not hold if it is a Delichon. sent21: something does buzz pancreatin. ; $proof$ = | sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the uranium does lunge untruthfulness.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the buzzing cobber occurs. | {C} | sent1: both the antibacterial and the buzzing standpipe occurs. sent2: the antibacterial occurs. | sent1: ({A} & {B}) sent2: {A} | [
"sent1 -> int1: the buzzing standpipe occurs.;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: {B};"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the buzzing cobber occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the antibacterial and the buzzing standpipe occurs. sent2: the antibacterial occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the buzzing standpipe occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal but it buzzes antihero. | (¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | sent1: if something that is a gulf is non-sarcolemmal the paraphysis is not a squama. sent2: that the loosestrife is a lipped but it is not a secondary is incorrect if the fact that it is not supportive is not false. sent3: if something is supportive then the fact that it does not repress Ereshkigal and buzzes antihero is not right. sent4: the fact that the affiliate is a Ipsus that is calyptrate is wrong if the paraphysis is not nonreflective. sent5: that if the effervescence is a Alsobia but it is not supportive the blowfly is supportive is true. sent6: the goose is not a kind of a lipped. sent7: the fact that the Sufi is a gulf is not false. sent8: the Sufi is not sarcolemmal. sent9: if that something is a kind of a lipped that is not secondary does not hold then it does buzz antihero. sent10: the queen is a Alsobia. sent11: something is not nonreflective if it is not a squama. sent12: if that the loosestrife is not righteous and represses Ereshkigal is not true then it does not represses Ereshkigal. sent13: the loosestrife is not supportive. sent14: the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal if that it is not a kind of a Alsobia and it does repress Ereshkigal is false. sent15: if the fact that something is a Ipsus and it is calyptrate is false it is calyptrate. sent16: if there is something such that it is not calyptrate the effervescence is a kind of a Alsobia that is not supportive. sent17: the fact that the loosestrife is not a Alsobia but it does repress Ereshkigal is wrong. sent18: if something is a kind of a Alsobia it buzzes antihero. | sent1: (x): ({K}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{I}{d} sent2: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent4: ¬{H}{d} -> ¬({G}{c} & {F}{c}) sent5: ({E}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {C}{a} sent6: ¬{AA}{fi} sent7: {K}{e} sent8: ¬{J}{e} sent9: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: {E}{fg} sent11: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{H}x sent12: ¬(¬{GT}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent13: ¬{C}{aa} sent14: ¬(¬{E}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent15: (x): ¬({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}x sent16: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent17: ¬(¬{E}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent18: (x): {E}x -> {B}x | [
"sent9 -> int1: the loosestrife does buzz antihero if the fact that it is a lipped and it is not secondary does not hold.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the loosestrife is a lipped and is not a secondary does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the loosestrife does buzz antihero.; sent14 & sent17 -> int4: the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{aa}; sent14 & sent17 -> int4: ¬{A}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal and buzzes antihero is false. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | [
"sent3 -> int5: the fact that the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal but it does buzz antihero does not hold if it is supportive.; sent15 -> int6: the affiliate is not calyptrate if that it is a Ipsus and is calyptrate is not correct.; sent11 -> int7: if the fact that the paraphysis is not a kind of a squama is correct then it is not nonreflective.; sent7 & sent8 -> int8: the Sufi is a kind of a gulf but it is not sarcolemmal.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a gulf that is not sarcolemmal.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the paraphysis is not a squama.; int7 & int10 -> int11: the paraphysis is not nonreflective.; sent4 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the affiliate is a Ipsus and calyptrate is not true.; int6 & int12 -> int13: that the affiliate is not calyptrate is right.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not calyptrate.; int14 & sent16 -> int15: the effervescence is a kind of a Alsobia that is not supportive.; sent5 & int15 -> int16: the blowfly is supportive.; int16 -> int17: the blowfly is either supportive or afferent or both.; int17 -> int18: either something is not unsupportive or it is an afferent or both.;"
]
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal but it buzzes antihero. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a gulf is non-sarcolemmal the paraphysis is not a squama. sent2: that the loosestrife is a lipped but it is not a secondary is incorrect if the fact that it is not supportive is not false. sent3: if something is supportive then the fact that it does not repress Ereshkigal and buzzes antihero is not right. sent4: the fact that the affiliate is a Ipsus that is calyptrate is wrong if the paraphysis is not nonreflective. sent5: that if the effervescence is a Alsobia but it is not supportive the blowfly is supportive is true. sent6: the goose is not a kind of a lipped. sent7: the fact that the Sufi is a gulf is not false. sent8: the Sufi is not sarcolemmal. sent9: if that something is a kind of a lipped that is not secondary does not hold then it does buzz antihero. sent10: the queen is a Alsobia. sent11: something is not nonreflective if it is not a squama. sent12: if that the loosestrife is not righteous and represses Ereshkigal is not true then it does not represses Ereshkigal. sent13: the loosestrife is not supportive. sent14: the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal if that it is not a kind of a Alsobia and it does repress Ereshkigal is false. sent15: if the fact that something is a Ipsus and it is calyptrate is false it is calyptrate. sent16: if there is something such that it is not calyptrate the effervescence is a kind of a Alsobia that is not supportive. sent17: the fact that the loosestrife is not a Alsobia but it does repress Ereshkigal is wrong. sent18: if something is a kind of a Alsobia it buzzes antihero. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: the loosestrife does buzz antihero if the fact that it is a lipped and it is not secondary does not hold.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the loosestrife is a lipped and is not a secondary does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the loosestrife does buzz antihero.; sent14 & sent17 -> int4: the loosestrife does not repress Ereshkigal.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the myelinization is not cometary is true. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a tackle and it does smile orgy. sent2: the well does rub. sent3: the myelinization is cometary but it is not mediatory if it is not basilar. sent4: the well is not a fifty if the fact that that the myelinization is both mediatory and basilar is not true is not false. sent5: the well is both billiards and non-cometary. sent6: the cling is not a kind of a fifty. sent7: the myelinization is not billiards. sent8: the ladybug is a IRA but it is not mediatory. sent9: that the well is proconsular hold. sent10: the fact that the well is both basilar and a fifty is not right. sent11: something is a fifty but it is not cometary if it is not mediatory. sent12: if the well is not cometary then the myelinization is not billiards. sent13: the well is not cometary if that the myelinization is mediatory and is billiards is not right. sent14: if that the myelinization is not basilar is not wrong that the well is not a kind of a fifty hold. sent15: the myelinization is mediatory but it is not billiards if it is not basilar. sent16: there exists nothing such that it is both billiards and basilar. sent17: if the myelinization is not billiards then the fact that the well is not a kind of a fifty is not false. sent18: the well is not a fifty. sent19: there is nothing that is a retreated that lunges caribou. sent20: the wetter is not a fifty. | sent1: (x): ¬({BD}x & {AG}x) sent2: {BP}{aa} sent3: ¬{AB}{a} -> ({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent4: ¬({A}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{C}{aa} sent5: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent6: ¬{C}{ac} sent7: ¬{AA}{a} sent8: ({AF}{ia} & ¬{A}{ia}) sent9: {CP}{aa} sent10: ¬({AB}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x & ¬{B}x) sent12: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{a} sent13: ¬({A}{a} & {AA}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent14: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent15: ¬{AB}{a} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent16: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent17: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent18: ¬{C}{aa} sent19: (x): ¬({O}x & {GR}x) sent20: ¬{C}{gh} | [
"sent16 -> int1: the fact that the well is not non-billiards and not non-basilar does not hold.; sent11 -> int2: the myelinization is both a fifty and not cometary if it is not mediatory.;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent11 -> int2: ¬{A}{a} -> ({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a});"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 4 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the myelinization is not cometary is true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is a kind of a tackle and it does smile orgy. sent2: the well does rub. sent3: the myelinization is cometary but it is not mediatory if it is not basilar. sent4: the well is not a fifty if the fact that that the myelinization is both mediatory and basilar is not true is not false. sent5: the well is both billiards and non-cometary. sent6: the cling is not a kind of a fifty. sent7: the myelinization is not billiards. sent8: the ladybug is a IRA but it is not mediatory. sent9: that the well is proconsular hold. sent10: the fact that the well is both basilar and a fifty is not right. sent11: something is a fifty but it is not cometary if it is not mediatory. sent12: if the well is not cometary then the myelinization is not billiards. sent13: the well is not cometary if that the myelinization is mediatory and is billiards is not right. sent14: if that the myelinization is not basilar is not wrong that the well is not a kind of a fifty hold. sent15: the myelinization is mediatory but it is not billiards if it is not basilar. sent16: there exists nothing such that it is both billiards and basilar. sent17: if the myelinization is not billiards then the fact that the well is not a kind of a fifty is not false. sent18: the well is not a fifty. sent19: there is nothing that is a retreated that lunges caribou. sent20: the wetter is not a fifty. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: the fact that the well is not non-billiards and not non-basilar does not hold.; sent11 -> int2: the myelinization is both a fifty and not cometary if it is not mediatory.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the rebutter is antithyroid. | {A}{a} | sent1: that that the rebutter is not an interdiction but it is a Zaglossus is not false does not hold. sent2: the rebutter is not a liberal but it is a telegram if it is not a kind of an escalation. sent3: something is Gregorian if that it does not shoplift and recovers is not correct. sent4: if the rebutter is not regular it does not repress mailbox and it does rear. sent5: the lodgepole is not non-roentgenographic if the Prima is a Bucconidae. sent6: the rebutter buzzes xenotime. sent7: if the interceptor is Gregorian then the Prima is a Bucconidae. sent8: if the rebutter is an interdiction then that that it does not smile Piper and it is a regular hold is not right. sent9: the Gallus smiles Piper. sent10: if the rebutter buzzes flogger then that it does not subdivide and is antithyroid is not right. sent11: the Marrano smiles Piper. sent12: if the rebutter is not antithyroid it is a kind of a regular. sent13: that the rebutter is not apocryphal but it is biologistic is false if it is antithyroid. sent14: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain is a kind of non-hypercatalectic thing that smiles Piper does not hold. sent15: the rebutter does not smile Piper but it is regular if it is not antithyroid. sent16: there exists something such that it does shoplift. sent17: the rebutter does not powder and does pelt. sent18: the rebutter is a kind of a regular. sent19: the blow is a regular. sent20: the pursuer is antithyroid. sent21: everything is either not a Bucconidae or not roentgenographic or both. | sent1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {DC}{a}) sent2: ¬{IU}{a} -> (¬{BB}{a} & {BP}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) -> {F}x sent4: ¬{AB}{a} -> (¬{FB}{a} & {GJ}{a}) sent5: {E}{d} -> {D}{c} sent6: {FC}{a} sent7: {F}{e} -> {E}{d} sent8: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: {AA}{s} sent10: {IG}{a} -> ¬(¬{ER}{a} & {A}{a}) sent11: {AA}{fh} sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} sent13: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{FJ}{a} & {BJ}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{AC}{ch} & {AA}{ch}) sent15: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent16: (Ex): {G}x sent17: (¬{DO}{a} & {DU}{a}) sent18: {AB}{a} sent19: {AB}{fe} sent20: {A}{hu} sent21: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rebutter is not antithyroid.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the rebutter does not smile Piper and is a regular.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a});"
]
| the fact that the rebutter is not antithyroid hold. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int2: if that the interceptor does not shoplift and does recover is not correct then it is Gregorian.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the rebutter is antithyroid. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the rebutter is not an interdiction but it is a Zaglossus is not false does not hold. sent2: the rebutter is not a liberal but it is a telegram if it is not a kind of an escalation. sent3: something is Gregorian if that it does not shoplift and recovers is not correct. sent4: if the rebutter is not regular it does not repress mailbox and it does rear. sent5: the lodgepole is not non-roentgenographic if the Prima is a Bucconidae. sent6: the rebutter buzzes xenotime. sent7: if the interceptor is Gregorian then the Prima is a Bucconidae. sent8: if the rebutter is an interdiction then that that it does not smile Piper and it is a regular hold is not right. sent9: the Gallus smiles Piper. sent10: if the rebutter buzzes flogger then that it does not subdivide and is antithyroid is not right. sent11: the Marrano smiles Piper. sent12: if the rebutter is not antithyroid it is a kind of a regular. sent13: that the rebutter is not apocryphal but it is biologistic is false if it is antithyroid. sent14: the fact that the fire-on-the-mountain is a kind of non-hypercatalectic thing that smiles Piper does not hold. sent15: the rebutter does not smile Piper but it is regular if it is not antithyroid. sent16: there exists something such that it does shoplift. sent17: the rebutter does not powder and does pelt. sent18: the rebutter is a kind of a regular. sent19: the blow is a regular. sent20: the pursuer is antithyroid. sent21: everything is either not a Bucconidae or not roentgenographic or both. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rebutter is not antithyroid.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the rebutter does not smile Piper and is a regular.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cobalt then it is not Nordic is incorrect. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is a cobalt then it is Nordic. sent2: something is not irreparable if it is a kind of a cobalt. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pisanosaur it does not smile Midwest. sent4: the worsted is not a bevy if it is a bier. sent5: if the worsted is a kind of a cobalt then it is not Nordic. sent6: there exists something such that if it does repress backsword it is not an agoraphobia. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a dust it does not jar. sent8: the worsted is Nordic if the fact that it is a cobalt is right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is caudate the fact that it is not a kind of a knitter is correct. | sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{FN}x sent3: (Ex): {HC}x -> ¬{BU}x sent4: {BC}{aa} -> ¬{GK}{aa} sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent6: (Ex): {EQ}x -> ¬{AI}x sent7: (Ex): {HQ}x -> ¬{AO}x sent8: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent9: (Ex): {GP}x -> ¬{FT}x | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| if the marshmallow is a cobalt then it is not irreparable. | {A}{ee} -> ¬{FN}{ee} | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of a cobalt then it is not Nordic is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a cobalt then it is Nordic. sent2: something is not irreparable if it is a kind of a cobalt. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a pisanosaur it does not smile Midwest. sent4: the worsted is not a bevy if it is a bier. sent5: if the worsted is a kind of a cobalt then it is not Nordic. sent6: there exists something such that if it does repress backsword it is not an agoraphobia. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a dust it does not jar. sent8: the worsted is Nordic if the fact that it is a cobalt is right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is caudate the fact that it is not a kind of a knitter is correct. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the diva does not lunge flugelhorn. | ¬{E}{b} | sent1: the chambermaid does buzz caracolito. sent2: there is something such that it does cloud. sent3: the squawker does buzz caracolito and is a kind of a Europan if the grease does not help. sent4: something buzzes caracolito. sent5: if something is not a Benton then that it does not lunge flugelhorn is correct. sent6: there exists something such that it is meningeal. sent7: that something is noncrystalline but it is not a Benton is not correct if it is not carnivorous. sent8: the fact that the chambermaid does not buzz caracolito is not wrong if the squawker does buzz caracolito and is a Benton. sent9: the diva does not buzz caracolito. sent10: if the fact that the stenopterygius is noncrystalline and is not a Benton is not correct the squawker is a kind of a Benton. sent11: if something that buzzes property does buzz caracolito then the diva is not a kind of a Benton. sent12: there exists something such that it does buzz property. sent13: the chambermaid is not a kind of a cloud and does buzz property if it does not buzz caracolito. sent14: the chambermaid is a kind of a Benton that buzzes caracolito if there exists something such that it buzzes property. sent15: the grease does not help. | sent1: {C}{a} sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: ¬{H}{e} -> ({C}{c} & {G}{c}) sent4: (Ex): {C}x sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{E}x sent6: (Ex): {AM}x sent7: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{D}x) sent8: ({C}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent9: ¬{C}{b} sent10: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> {D}{c} sent11: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}{b} sent12: (Ex): {B}x sent13: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): {B}x -> ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: ¬{H}{e} | [
"sent5 -> int1: the fact that the diva does not lunge flugelhorn is not false if it is not a Benton.;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{E}{b};"
]
| the diva lunges flugelhorn. | {E}{b} | [
"sent3 & sent15 -> int2: the squawker buzzes caracolito and it is a Europan.; int2 -> int3: the squawker does buzz caracolito.; sent7 -> int4: that the stenopterygius is a kind of noncrystalline thing that is not a kind of a Benton is not right if it is not carnivorous.;"
]
| 8 | 4 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diva does not lunge flugelhorn. ; $context$ = sent1: the chambermaid does buzz caracolito. sent2: there is something such that it does cloud. sent3: the squawker does buzz caracolito and is a kind of a Europan if the grease does not help. sent4: something buzzes caracolito. sent5: if something is not a Benton then that it does not lunge flugelhorn is correct. sent6: there exists something such that it is meningeal. sent7: that something is noncrystalline but it is not a Benton is not correct if it is not carnivorous. sent8: the fact that the chambermaid does not buzz caracolito is not wrong if the squawker does buzz caracolito and is a Benton. sent9: the diva does not buzz caracolito. sent10: if the fact that the stenopterygius is noncrystalline and is not a Benton is not correct the squawker is a kind of a Benton. sent11: if something that buzzes property does buzz caracolito then the diva is not a kind of a Benton. sent12: there exists something such that it does buzz property. sent13: the chambermaid is not a kind of a cloud and does buzz property if it does not buzz caracolito. sent14: the chambermaid is a kind of a Benton that buzzes caracolito if there exists something such that it buzzes property. sent15: the grease does not help. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: the fact that the diva does not lunge flugelhorn is not false if it is not a Benton.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the bromoform is impressive. | {C}{b} | sent1: the evening-snow is indirect. sent2: The annulment lunges hearts. sent3: if the hearts is a microevolution then that it tumbles and it is impressive is not true. sent4: if the fact that something is subatomic thing that is a kind of a Jaculus does not hold it is not subatomic. sent5: something is not impressive if it is not a microevolution and it does lunge annulment. sent6: the fact that the hearts smiles Piper and it is a tumble is incorrect if it lunges annulment. sent7: if the fact that the hearts is not indirect is not false it is not a cool or it is not a brushwork or both. sent8: the carangid is not impressive but it lunges annulment if the loyalist is not subatomic. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a Jaculus then the fact that the loyalist is a kind of subatomic thing that is a Jaculus does not hold. sent10: if the bromoform is not subatomic then it is not a kind of a microevolution and lunges annulment. sent11: the megakaryocyte is not impressive if that the hearts is non-subatomic but not impressive is not false. sent12: if that that the hearts does not smile Piper but it is a tumble is not right is right then the bromoform is a microevolution. sent13: the hearts is not indirect if the fact that it is a kind of a conessi that is not nectar-rich is false. sent14: the fact that the evening-snow is a cool and/or it is not a brushwork is wrong if the fact that it is indirect is not false. sent15: the fact that the hearts is not impressive and is hyperemic is not true. sent16: the evening-snow is not a Jaculus if that it does cool or it is not a brushwork or both is not true. sent17: the hearts lunges annulment. sent18: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Jaculus is right it is not subatomic and it is impressive. sent19: the fact that if the hearts lunges annulment then that the hearts does not smile Piper and tumbles is wrong is not incorrect. sent20: if something is not indirect that it is not a cool or not a brushwork or both is false. sent21: the bromoform is impressive if it is a microevolution. sent22: that the hearts smiles Piper and it is a tumble is false. sent23: the fact that the hearts is not a tumble but it is a microevolution is incorrect. sent24: if that the bromoform does not cool or it is not a brushwork or both is wrong the hearts is not a Jaculus. sent25: if the hearts does smile Piper the bromoform is a microevolution. | sent1: {H}{e} sent2: {AC}{aa} sent3: {B}{a} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent5: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent7: ¬{H}{a} -> (¬{G}{a} v ¬{F}{a}) sent8: ¬{D}{d} -> (¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) sent9: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}{d} & {E}{d}) sent10: ¬{D}{b} -> (¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent11: (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{de} sent12: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent13: ¬({I}{a} & ¬{J}{a}) -> ¬{H}{a} sent14: {H}{e} -> ¬({G}{e} v ¬{F}{e}) sent15: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {GN}{a}) sent16: ¬({G}{e} v ¬{F}{e}) -> ¬{E}{e} sent17: {A}{a} sent18: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x) sent19: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent20: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x v ¬{F}x) sent21: {B}{b} -> {C}{b} sent22: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent23: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {B}{a}) sent24: ¬(¬{G}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent25: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"sent19 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that that the hearts does not smile Piper and is a kind of a tumble is not false does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the bromoform is a kind of a microevolution is not false.; int2 & sent21 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent19 & sent17 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 & sent12 -> int2: {B}{b}; int2 & sent21 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the bromoform is not impressive. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int3: the bromoform is not impressive if it is not a microevolution and lunges annulment.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bromoform is impressive. ; $context$ = sent1: the evening-snow is indirect. sent2: The annulment lunges hearts. sent3: if the hearts is a microevolution then that it tumbles and it is impressive is not true. sent4: if the fact that something is subatomic thing that is a kind of a Jaculus does not hold it is not subatomic. sent5: something is not impressive if it is not a microevolution and it does lunge annulment. sent6: the fact that the hearts smiles Piper and it is a tumble is incorrect if it lunges annulment. sent7: if the fact that the hearts is not indirect is not false it is not a cool or it is not a brushwork or both. sent8: the carangid is not impressive but it lunges annulment if the loyalist is not subatomic. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a Jaculus then the fact that the loyalist is a kind of subatomic thing that is a Jaculus does not hold. sent10: if the bromoform is not subatomic then it is not a kind of a microevolution and lunges annulment. sent11: the megakaryocyte is not impressive if that the hearts is non-subatomic but not impressive is not false. sent12: if that that the hearts does not smile Piper but it is a tumble is not right is right then the bromoform is a microevolution. sent13: the hearts is not indirect if the fact that it is a kind of a conessi that is not nectar-rich is false. sent14: the fact that the evening-snow is a cool and/or it is not a brushwork is wrong if the fact that it is indirect is not false. sent15: the fact that the hearts is not impressive and is hyperemic is not true. sent16: the evening-snow is not a Jaculus if that it does cool or it is not a brushwork or both is not true. sent17: the hearts lunges annulment. sent18: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Jaculus is right it is not subatomic and it is impressive. sent19: the fact that if the hearts lunges annulment then that the hearts does not smile Piper and tumbles is wrong is not incorrect. sent20: if something is not indirect that it is not a cool or not a brushwork or both is false. sent21: the bromoform is impressive if it is a microevolution. sent22: that the hearts smiles Piper and it is a tumble is false. sent23: the fact that the hearts is not a tumble but it is a microevolution is incorrect. sent24: if that the bromoform does not cool or it is not a brushwork or both is wrong the hearts is not a Jaculus. sent25: if the hearts does smile Piper the bromoform is a microevolution. ; $proof$ = | sent19 & sent17 -> int1: the fact that that the hearts does not smile Piper and is a kind of a tumble is not false does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: that the bromoform is a kind of a microevolution is not false.; int2 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | if the tartan does triangulate then the fact that the fact that it does not smoothen and it is ectopic is not incorrect is not true. | {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | sent1: the fact that something is not a Nash but it is not irremovable if it is an altruism is true. sent2: if something is a defeatist then that it lunges upstart and it is a kind of a Appalachians is not true. sent3: if the tartan is a kind of a debacle the fact that it is caryophyllaceous and localizes is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the argasid does not lunge executrix and does smoothen is not correct if it is a aculeus. sent5: if something is a unseemliness then it does not lunge spleen and is a seesaw. sent6: the tartan does not smoothen but it is a kind of an operations if it is a gluon. sent7: that the tartan does not smile lordship but it does triangulate is not right if it is epigastric. sent8: something is both not a Gondi and a chuck if it trephines. sent9: the fact that something does smoothen and is not non-ectopic is false if it does triangulate. sent10: something does not smoothen but it is ectopic if it does triangulate. sent11: if the cordierite conceals the fact that it trephines and it does triangulate does not hold. sent12: if the lambrequin does buzz indisposition then the fact that it does not conceal and it does suckle does not hold. sent13: if the tartan smoothens the fact that it is not caducean and it does suckle is wrong. sent14: if the muttonfish is a Taracahitian the fact that it is a kind of triangulate thing that is unperceptive is false. sent15: if something suckles it does not ball and it is corneal. sent16: the tartan does not smoothen but it is ectopic if it does triangulate. sent17: if the hake is a kind of a izar the fact that it is not a kind of a Filipino and it does smoothen is not right. sent18: the fact that something does not smoothen and is ectopic is false if it is triangulate. | sent1: (x): {BC}x -> (¬{CI}x & {HC}x) sent2: (x): {IO}x -> ¬({JG}x & {M}x) sent3: {CE}{aa} -> ¬({GM}{aa} & {IS}{aa}) sent4: {CA}{cb} -> ¬(¬{DJ}{cb} & {AA}{cb}) sent5: (x): {C}x -> (¬{IE}x & {FC}x) sent6: {BH}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {CO}{aa}) sent7: {JE}{aa} -> ¬(¬{ID}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent8: (x): {CL}x -> (¬{AL}x & {IU}x) sent9: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: {JD}{aq} -> ¬({CL}{aq} & {A}{aq}) sent12: {HJ}{gs} -> ¬(¬{JD}{gs} & {AO}{gs}) sent13: {AA}{aa} -> ¬(¬{F}{aa} & {AO}{aa}) sent14: {CH}{eo} -> ¬({A}{eo} & {HD}{eo}) sent15: (x): {AO}x -> (¬{FK}x & {K}x) sent16: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent17: {H}{fl} -> ¬(¬{AR}{fl} & {AA}{fl}) sent18: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent18 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent18 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = if the tartan does triangulate then the fact that the fact that it does not smoothen and it is ectopic is not incorrect is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a Nash but it is not irremovable if it is an altruism is true. sent2: if something is a defeatist then that it lunges upstart and it is a kind of a Appalachians is not true. sent3: if the tartan is a kind of a debacle the fact that it is caryophyllaceous and localizes is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the argasid does not lunge executrix and does smoothen is not correct if it is a aculeus. sent5: if something is a unseemliness then it does not lunge spleen and is a seesaw. sent6: the tartan does not smoothen but it is a kind of an operations if it is a gluon. sent7: that the tartan does not smile lordship but it does triangulate is not right if it is epigastric. sent8: something is both not a Gondi and a chuck if it trephines. sent9: the fact that something does smoothen and is not non-ectopic is false if it does triangulate. sent10: something does not smoothen but it is ectopic if it does triangulate. sent11: if the cordierite conceals the fact that it trephines and it does triangulate does not hold. sent12: if the lambrequin does buzz indisposition then the fact that it does not conceal and it does suckle does not hold. sent13: if the tartan smoothens the fact that it is not caducean and it does suckle is wrong. sent14: if the muttonfish is a Taracahitian the fact that it is a kind of triangulate thing that is unperceptive is false. sent15: if something suckles it does not ball and it is corneal. sent16: the tartan does not smoothen but it is ectopic if it does triangulate. sent17: if the hake is a kind of a izar the fact that it is not a kind of a Filipino and it does smoothen is not right. sent18: the fact that something does not smoothen and is ectopic is false if it is triangulate. ; $proof$ = | sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the unchristianness does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: the anatomicness happens. sent2: that the formulariness does not occur and the commotion does not occur is brought about by the rotating. sent3: that the smiling occultism does not occur is caused by that the anatomicness happens and the unchristianness occurs. sent4: if the commotion does not occur the smiling occultism and the formulary happens. sent5: either the anatomicness does not occur or the smiling occultism happens or both if the formulary does not occur. | sent1: {A} sent2: {F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent5: ¬{D} -> (¬{A} v {C}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unchristianness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the anatomicness and the unchristianness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the smiling occultism does not occur.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {B}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{C};"
]
| the unchristianness happens. | {B} | []
| 7 | 4 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the unchristianness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the anatomicness happens. sent2: that the formulariness does not occur and the commotion does not occur is brought about by the rotating. sent3: that the smiling occultism does not occur is caused by that the anatomicness happens and the unchristianness occurs. sent4: if the commotion does not occur the smiling occultism and the formulary happens. sent5: either the anatomicness does not occur or the smiling occultism happens or both if the formulary does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unchristianness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the anatomicness and the unchristianness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the smiling occultism does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the connoisseur is not a cyberpunk. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the onyx does repress Kennelly if the fact that the smallmouth is a kind of conspiratorial thing that does not repress Kennelly does not hold. sent2: that the connoisseur is a collider is right. sent3: the aperitif does buzz shotgun. sent4: something is not a ROI and not a evaporite if it is not non-conspiratorial. sent5: everything is conspiratorial. sent6: something is a ROI if the fact that it is not a kind of a ROI and does not buzz Hubel is not right. sent7: the fact that the connoisseur is a cyberpunk is true. sent8: the connoisseur is a Faust. sent9: if the Kansa is a kind of a ROI then that the smallmouth is a kind of conspiratorial thing that does not repress Kennelly is wrong. sent10: something is not a evaporite and does not repress defecation if it represses Kennelly. sent11: if something represses defecation it is a kind of a cyberpunk. sent12: the bombshell is a cyberpunk. sent13: something does repress defecation if that it does repress Kennelly and it does not repress defecation is not true. sent14: the chamberlain is a cyberpunk. | sent1: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {D}{b} sent2: {BE}{a} sent3: {G}{e} sent4: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) sent5: (x): {F}x sent6: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{H}x) -> {E}x sent7: {A}{a} sent8: {II}{a} sent9: {E}{d} -> ¬({F}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent10: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent11: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent12: {A}{da} sent13: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{B}x) -> {B}x sent14: {A}{dl} | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the connoisseur is not a cyberpunk. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent10 -> int1: the onyx is not a evaporite and does not repress defecation if it represses Kennelly.; sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the Kansa is not a kind of a ROI and does not buzz Hubel is not true it is a ROI.; sent3 -> int3: there is something such that it buzzes shotgun.;"
]
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the connoisseur is not a cyberpunk. ; $context$ = sent1: the onyx does repress Kennelly if the fact that the smallmouth is a kind of conspiratorial thing that does not repress Kennelly does not hold. sent2: that the connoisseur is a collider is right. sent3: the aperitif does buzz shotgun. sent4: something is not a ROI and not a evaporite if it is not non-conspiratorial. sent5: everything is conspiratorial. sent6: something is a ROI if the fact that it is not a kind of a ROI and does not buzz Hubel is not right. sent7: the fact that the connoisseur is a cyberpunk is true. sent8: the connoisseur is a Faust. sent9: if the Kansa is a kind of a ROI then that the smallmouth is a kind of conspiratorial thing that does not repress Kennelly is wrong. sent10: something is not a evaporite and does not repress defecation if it represses Kennelly. sent11: if something represses defecation it is a kind of a cyberpunk. sent12: the bombshell is a cyberpunk. sent13: something does repress defecation if that it does repress Kennelly and it does not repress defecation is not true. sent14: the chamberlain is a cyberpunk. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the wiring happens. | {C} | sent1: the wire occurs if the Constitution happens. sent2: the fact that the smiling Sudbury does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the repressing synchroscope results in that the nuclearness does not occur and the smiling poxvirus does not occur. sent4: that the wiring and the Constitution happens is wrong if the smiling poxvirus does not occur. sent5: that the smiling poxvirus happens and the nuclearness happens triggers that the Constitution does not occur. sent6: that the Constitution does not occur brings about that the perfecting happens and the sprinting happens. sent7: that the serve and the repressing synchroscope occurs is triggered by that the operaticness does not occur. sent8: if the non-autosomalness and the uricosuricness occurs the operaticness does not occur. sent9: if the smiling Sudbury does not occur the regimentalsness occurs and the autosomalness does not occur. | sent1: {B} -> {C} sent2: ¬{L} sent3: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent4: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {B}) sent5: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{B} -> ({EU} & {A}) sent7: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) sent8: (¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} sent9: ¬{L} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) | []
| []
| the wire does not occur. | ¬{C} | []
| 6 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the wiring happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the wire occurs if the Constitution happens. sent2: the fact that the smiling Sudbury does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the repressing synchroscope results in that the nuclearness does not occur and the smiling poxvirus does not occur. sent4: that the wiring and the Constitution happens is wrong if the smiling poxvirus does not occur. sent5: that the smiling poxvirus happens and the nuclearness happens triggers that the Constitution does not occur. sent6: that the Constitution does not occur brings about that the perfecting happens and the sprinting happens. sent7: that the serve and the repressing synchroscope occurs is triggered by that the operaticness does not occur. sent8: if the non-autosomalness and the uricosuricness occurs the operaticness does not occur. sent9: if the smiling Sudbury does not occur the regimentalsness occurs and the autosomalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the tulip is a kind of pelvic thing that does not buzz ectoderm. | ({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) | sent1: the fact that the gibberellin is gynecological but it is not precordial is incorrect if the insectifuge is not pelvic. sent2: if something does not repress Lasiurus and it is not a kind of a succession it is not precordial. sent3: the fact that the counterirritant buzzes ectoderm but it is not a kind of a Dutch does not hold. sent4: the gibberellin does buzz highboard if there is something such that the fact that it does not buzz highboard and it is not a kind of a dentist is incorrect. sent5: the insectifuge is not precordial if the gibberellin is not gynecological. sent6: the tulip is not a Epistle. sent7: the fact that the tulip does buzz ectoderm and is not precordial is not true if the insectifuge is not pelvic. sent8: the insectifuge does not buzz ectoderm. sent9: the insectifuge does not repress inquisition. sent10: that the tulip is pelvic and does buzz ectoderm is incorrect. sent11: that the gibberellin is not gynecological is right. sent12: that something is pelvic but it is not a Morgantown is incorrect if it is not gynecological. sent13: the tulip is not a kind of a Kisumu. sent14: the fact that the insectifuge is gynecological thing that is not precordial is incorrect. sent15: if the gibberellin is non-precordial then that the SACLANT does not buzz ectoderm but it is gynecological does not hold. sent16: that something does not buzz highboard and is not a dentist does not hold if it does not repress inquisition. sent17: if the insectifuge is not precordial that the tulip is pelvic but it does not buzz ectoderm is not right. sent18: if the insectifuge is not gynecological then that the tulip is precordial but it does not buzz ectoderm is not correct. sent19: the insectifuge is not gynecological. sent20: if the fact that that something does not buzz ectoderm and is gynecological is not false is not true then the fact that it is not gynecological is right. sent21: the fact that the tulip is pelvic and does buzz ectoderm is not true if the insectifuge is not precordial. sent22: the fact that the tulip is a kind of topless thing that does not lunge contrabass is not right. sent23: something does not repress Lasiurus and it is not a succession if it does buzz highboard. | sent1: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent2: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({D}{gu} & ¬{FA}{gu}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}{a} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent6: ¬{GM}{c} sent7: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({D}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent8: ¬{D}{b} sent9: ¬{H}{b} sent10: ¬({C}{c} & {D}{c}) sent11: ¬{A}{a} sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{L}x) sent13: ¬{O}{c} sent14: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent15: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{cc} & {A}{cc}) sent16: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{I}x) sent17: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent18: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent19: ¬{A}{b} sent20: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent21: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & {D}{c}) sent22: ¬({DS}{c} & ¬{T}{c}) sent23: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) | [
"sent5 & sent11 -> int1: the insectifuge is not precordial.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent11 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the SACLANT is pelvic and not a Morgantown is not true. | ¬({C}{cc} & ¬{L}{cc}) | [
"sent12 -> int2: that the SACLANT is pelvic and is not a kind of a Morgantown does not hold if it is not gynecological.; sent20 -> int3: the SACLANT is not gynecological if the fact that it does not buzz ectoderm and it is gynecological is not right.; sent2 -> int4: the gibberellin is not precordial if it does not repress Lasiurus and is not a succession.; sent23 -> int5: the gibberellin does not repress Lasiurus and is not a succession if that it buzzes highboard is not false.; sent16 -> int6: if the insectifuge does not repress inquisition the fact that it does not buzz highboard and it is not a dentist does not hold.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the insectifuge does not buzz highboard and is not a dentist is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that that it does not buzz highboard and is not a dentist hold does not hold.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the gibberellin does buzz highboard.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the gibberellin does not repress Lasiurus and it is not a succession.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the gibberellin is not precordial.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the SACLANT does not buzz ectoderm but it is gynecological does not hold.; int3 & int12 -> int13: the SACLANT is not gynecological.; int2 & int13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the tulip is a kind of pelvic thing that does not buzz ectoderm. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gibberellin is gynecological but it is not precordial is incorrect if the insectifuge is not pelvic. sent2: if something does not repress Lasiurus and it is not a kind of a succession it is not precordial. sent3: the fact that the counterirritant buzzes ectoderm but it is not a kind of a Dutch does not hold. sent4: the gibberellin does buzz highboard if there is something such that the fact that it does not buzz highboard and it is not a kind of a dentist is incorrect. sent5: the insectifuge is not precordial if the gibberellin is not gynecological. sent6: the tulip is not a Epistle. sent7: the fact that the tulip does buzz ectoderm and is not precordial is not true if the insectifuge is not pelvic. sent8: the insectifuge does not buzz ectoderm. sent9: the insectifuge does not repress inquisition. sent10: that the tulip is pelvic and does buzz ectoderm is incorrect. sent11: that the gibberellin is not gynecological is right. sent12: that something is pelvic but it is not a Morgantown is incorrect if it is not gynecological. sent13: the tulip is not a kind of a Kisumu. sent14: the fact that the insectifuge is gynecological thing that is not precordial is incorrect. sent15: if the gibberellin is non-precordial then that the SACLANT does not buzz ectoderm but it is gynecological does not hold. sent16: that something does not buzz highboard and is not a dentist does not hold if it does not repress inquisition. sent17: if the insectifuge is not precordial that the tulip is pelvic but it does not buzz ectoderm is not right. sent18: if the insectifuge is not gynecological then that the tulip is precordial but it does not buzz ectoderm is not correct. sent19: the insectifuge is not gynecological. sent20: if the fact that that something does not buzz ectoderm and is gynecological is not false is not true then the fact that it is not gynecological is right. sent21: the fact that the tulip is pelvic and does buzz ectoderm is not true if the insectifuge is not precordial. sent22: the fact that the tulip is a kind of topless thing that does not lunge contrabass is not right. sent23: something does not repress Lasiurus and it is not a succession if it does buzz highboard. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent11 -> int1: the insectifuge is not precordial.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the contributing and/or the lunging spotter happens. | ({B} v {C}) | sent1: if the Curietherapy does not occur either the biblioticness or the bicentennial or both occurs. sent2: if the fact that the cantonalness happens hold then the contributing happens. sent3: that the uglifying happens and the Curietherapy occurs does not hold if the fact that the repressing chartered does not occur is correct. sent4: if the lunging spotter occurs the contributing does not occur and the cantonalness does not occur. sent5: the cantonalness happens. sent6: if the cantonalness does not occur that either the contributing happens or the lunging spotter happens or both does not hold. sent7: the scout happens if the contributing does not occur and the cantonalness does not occur. sent8: if that the uglifying happens and the Curietherapy happens does not hold the Curietherapy does not occur. sent9: the non-cantonalness is caused by the crapshoot. sent10: the dissuasiveness occurs. | sent1: ¬{G} -> ({F} v {E}) sent2: {A} -> {B} sent3: ¬{H} -> ¬({I} & {G}) sent4: {C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent5: {A} sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} v {C}) sent7: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {EB} sent8: ¬({I} & {G}) -> ¬{G} sent9: {D} -> ¬{A} sent10: {CS} | [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the contributing occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the scouting happens. | {EB} | []
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the contributing and/or the lunging spotter happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Curietherapy does not occur either the biblioticness or the bicentennial or both occurs. sent2: if the fact that the cantonalness happens hold then the contributing happens. sent3: that the uglifying happens and the Curietherapy occurs does not hold if the fact that the repressing chartered does not occur is correct. sent4: if the lunging spotter occurs the contributing does not occur and the cantonalness does not occur. sent5: the cantonalness happens. sent6: if the cantonalness does not occur that either the contributing happens or the lunging spotter happens or both does not hold. sent7: the scout happens if the contributing does not occur and the cantonalness does not occur. sent8: if that the uglifying happens and the Curietherapy happens does not hold the Curietherapy does not occur. sent9: the non-cantonalness is caused by the crapshoot. sent10: the dissuasiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the contributing occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the cutaway does buzz demander. | {E}{b} | sent1: the Shoshone is placental and it is a Fijis. sent2: if the brachiopod is a kind of an omega it is a morale and it is not a kind of a boyfriend. sent3: the cutaway does not buzz demander if the Shoshone buzz demander but it is not a Fijis. sent4: the cutaway is servomechanical if that the settler is servomechanical is not right. sent5: the Shoshone does not wolf if it is servomechanical. sent6: that the Shoshone is a placental hold. sent7: the depositor is a boyfriend. sent8: if the Shoshone is not a Fijis the strawworm is a placental that buzzes demander. sent9: if the fact that the brachiopod is not erythroid and/or it is not servomechanical is not right then the settler is not servomechanical. sent10: if the depositor is a boyfriend and it is erythroid then the brachiopod is not an oligarch. sent11: the brachiopod is a kind of an omega. sent12: the cutaway does buzz demander if the Shoshone does not wolf. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not wiry and is an oligarch is incorrect. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-wiry an oligarch is incorrect then the cutaway is not a kind of an oligarch. sent15: if something is servomechanical then it is a placental. sent16: the fact that the depositor is erythroid is true. sent17: if something that is not an oligarch is servomechanical it is not a kind of a Fijis. sent18: a servomechanical thing does not wolf. sent19: the fact that something is not erythroid and/or it is not servomechanical is false if it is not a boyfriend. | sent1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: {K}{d} -> ({J}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) sent3: ({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent4: ¬{C}{c} -> {C}{b} sent5: {C}{a} -> ¬{D}{a} sent6: {A}{a} sent7: {H}{e} sent8: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{da} & {E}{da}) sent9: ¬(¬{G}{d} v ¬{C}{d}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent10: ({H}{e} & {G}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} sent11: {K}{d} sent12: ¬{D}{a} -> {E}{b} sent13: (Ex): ¬(¬{I}x & {F}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}{b} sent15: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent16: {G}{e} sent17: (x): (¬{F}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent18: (x): {C}x -> ¬{D}x sent19: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x v ¬{C}x) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the Shoshone is a Fijis.; int1 -> int2: either the Shoshone is servomechanical or it is a Fijis or both.;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({C}{a} v {B}{a});"
]
| the strawworm is an extremist or it does buzz demander or both. | ({AC}{da} v {E}{da}) | [
"sent17 -> int3: if the cutaway is not an oligarch but it is servomechanical it is not a Fijis.; sent13 & sent14 -> int4: that the cutaway is not an oligarch is not wrong.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the brachiopod either is non-erythroid or is not servomechanical or both is false if it is not a kind of a boyfriend.; sent2 & sent11 -> int6: the brachiopod is a morale but it is not a boyfriend.; int6 -> int7: the brachiopod is not a boyfriend.; int5 & int7 -> int8: that the brachiopod is not erythroid or it is not servomechanical or both does not hold.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the settler is not servomechanical.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the cutaway is servomechanical.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the cutaway is not an oligarch and is servomechanical hold.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the cutaway is not a Fijis is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: that something is not a kind of a Fijis hold.;"
]
| 13 | 4 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cutaway does buzz demander. ; $context$ = sent1: the Shoshone is placental and it is a Fijis. sent2: if the brachiopod is a kind of an omega it is a morale and it is not a kind of a boyfriend. sent3: the cutaway does not buzz demander if the Shoshone buzz demander but it is not a Fijis. sent4: the cutaway is servomechanical if that the settler is servomechanical is not right. sent5: the Shoshone does not wolf if it is servomechanical. sent6: that the Shoshone is a placental hold. sent7: the depositor is a boyfriend. sent8: if the Shoshone is not a Fijis the strawworm is a placental that buzzes demander. sent9: if the fact that the brachiopod is not erythroid and/or it is not servomechanical is not right then the settler is not servomechanical. sent10: if the depositor is a boyfriend and it is erythroid then the brachiopod is not an oligarch. sent11: the brachiopod is a kind of an omega. sent12: the cutaway does buzz demander if the Shoshone does not wolf. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not wiry and is an oligarch is incorrect. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-wiry an oligarch is incorrect then the cutaway is not a kind of an oligarch. sent15: if something is servomechanical then it is a placental. sent16: the fact that the depositor is erythroid is true. sent17: if something that is not an oligarch is servomechanical it is not a kind of a Fijis. sent18: a servomechanical thing does not wolf. sent19: the fact that something is not erythroid and/or it is not servomechanical is false if it is not a boyfriend. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the Shoshone is a Fijis.; int1 -> int2: either the Shoshone is servomechanical or it is a Fijis or both.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the fact that the flummery is either a Dorian or not a polygynist or both is not correct is true if it does stream. | {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: if the flummery streams then it is Dorian or it is not a polygynist or both. sent2: if something is a kind of a stream then that it is a kind of a Dorian and/or it is not a polygynist is false. sent3: that the flummery lunges unacceptability or is not an external or both does not hold if it does buzz amphibolite. sent4: that something is a kind of a nonconformism and/or it is not Libyan is wrong if it buzzes EPA. sent5: something is a kind of a polygynist if it does stream. sent6: that the iceberg is a kind of a CID and/or it does not lunge boastfulness does not hold if it is a Dorian. sent7: the fact that the flummery is not a polygynist is incorrect if it streams. sent8: if the oscitancy is bottomed that either it streams or it is not a kind of a marl or both is wrong. sent9: if something is a kind of a stream then it is a Dorian or it is not a kind of a polygynist or both. sent10: that the flummery exalts and/or it is non-majuscule is incorrect if it is a polygynist. sent11: if the teaser condenses the fact that it is Dorian or is not a porthole or both is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the spine is a kind of a polygynist or it is not incompetent or both is not right if it is a porthole. sent13: that something is entomological and/or not a goiter is not correct if it is a windage. | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: {AT}{aa} -> ¬({HR}{aa} v ¬{AN}{aa}) sent4: (x): {BU}x -> ¬({BK}x v ¬{HH}x) sent5: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x sent6: {AA}{er} -> ¬({AO}{er} v ¬{JA}{er}) sent7: {A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent8: {HT}{m} -> ¬({A}{m} v ¬{BQ}{m}) sent9: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent10: {AB}{aa} -> ¬({HL}{aa} v ¬{ER}{aa}) sent11: {CB}{di} -> ¬({AA}{di} v ¬{BB}{di}) sent12: {BB}{fa} -> ¬({AB}{fa} v ¬{FS}{fa}) sent13: (x): {IA}x -> ¬({T}x v ¬{CR}x) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the fact that the flummery is either a Dorian or not a polygynist or both is not correct is true if it does stream. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flummery streams then it is Dorian or it is not a polygynist or both. sent2: if something is a kind of a stream then that it is a kind of a Dorian and/or it is not a polygynist is false. sent3: that the flummery lunges unacceptability or is not an external or both does not hold if it does buzz amphibolite. sent4: that something is a kind of a nonconformism and/or it is not Libyan is wrong if it buzzes EPA. sent5: something is a kind of a polygynist if it does stream. sent6: that the iceberg is a kind of a CID and/or it does not lunge boastfulness does not hold if it is a Dorian. sent7: the fact that the flummery is not a polygynist is incorrect if it streams. sent8: if the oscitancy is bottomed that either it streams or it is not a kind of a marl or both is wrong. sent9: if something is a kind of a stream then it is a Dorian or it is not a kind of a polygynist or both. sent10: that the flummery exalts and/or it is non-majuscule is incorrect if it is a polygynist. sent11: if the teaser condenses the fact that it is Dorian or is not a porthole or both is incorrect. sent12: the fact that the spine is a kind of a polygynist or it is not incompetent or both is not right if it is a porthole. sent13: that something is entomological and/or not a goiter is not correct if it is a windage. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the trustee does not lunge misology and is dystopian does not hold. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: that either the imperialist is an expressionist or it is not a kind of a hurdle or both is incorrect if the TNF is earless. sent2: the blanket is not non-expressionist. sent3: that the TNF does not lunge misology and is not non-dystopian is not correct if the trustee does not lunge misology. sent4: the trustee is not a kind of an expressionist. sent5: that the trustee does not lunge misology but it is dystopian does not hold if that the TNF does not lunge misology is true. sent6: if the TNF does not lunge misology then that the trustee lunge misology and is dystopian is not true. sent7: the fact that the trustee is retentive and/or it is not Slovakian is not correct. sent8: that that the trustee is a kind of expressionist thing that lunges misology hold does not hold. sent9: the merlon does lunge misology if it is either nonarboreal or not Zoroastrian or both. sent10: if the trustee is not hot that the TNF is hot and does lunge misology is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the trustee lunges misology and it is dystopian is not correct. sent12: the fact that the TNF is an expressionist or not hot or both is not right. sent13: that the TNF is dystopian or it is not hot or both is not right. sent14: the trustee does not lunge misology but it is dystopian if the TNF is not earless. sent15: the fact that the TNF lunges misology and it is dystopian is not true if the fact that the trustee does not lunges misology is not false. sent16: the trustee is not a kind of an expressionist if the fact that either it is dystopian or it does not lunge misology or both is false. sent17: if the fact that the TNF either is an expressionist or is hot or both is not correct then it does not lunge misology. sent18: that the TNF is hot is correct. | sent1: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{ja} v ¬{ER}{ja}) sent2: {AA}{fl} sent3: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ¬{AA}{b} sent5: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent6: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent7: ¬({N}{b} v ¬{IO}{b}) sent8: ¬({AA}{b} & {B}{b}) sent9: ({D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) -> {B}{c} sent10: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {B}{a}) sent11: ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent12: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent13: ¬({C}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent14: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent15: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent16: ¬({C}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{b} sent17: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent18: {AB}{a} | []
| []
| that the imperialist either is expressionist or is not a kind of a hurdle or both is not correct. | ¬({AA}{ja} v ¬{ER}{ja}) | []
| 7 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the trustee does not lunge misology and is dystopian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the imperialist is an expressionist or it is not a kind of a hurdle or both is incorrect if the TNF is earless. sent2: the blanket is not non-expressionist. sent3: that the TNF does not lunge misology and is not non-dystopian is not correct if the trustee does not lunge misology. sent4: the trustee is not a kind of an expressionist. sent5: that the trustee does not lunge misology but it is dystopian does not hold if that the TNF does not lunge misology is true. sent6: if the TNF does not lunge misology then that the trustee lunge misology and is dystopian is not true. sent7: the fact that the trustee is retentive and/or it is not Slovakian is not correct. sent8: that that the trustee is a kind of expressionist thing that lunges misology hold does not hold. sent9: the merlon does lunge misology if it is either nonarboreal or not Zoroastrian or both. sent10: if the trustee is not hot that the TNF is hot and does lunge misology is incorrect. sent11: the fact that the trustee lunges misology and it is dystopian is not correct. sent12: the fact that the TNF is an expressionist or not hot or both is not right. sent13: that the TNF is dystopian or it is not hot or both is not right. sent14: the trustee does not lunge misology but it is dystopian if the TNF is not earless. sent15: the fact that the TNF lunges misology and it is dystopian is not true if the fact that the trustee does not lunges misology is not false. sent16: the trustee is not a kind of an expressionist if the fact that either it is dystopian or it does not lunge misology or both is false. sent17: if the fact that the TNF either is an expressionist or is hot or both is not correct then it does not lunge misology. sent18: that the TNF is hot is correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the cress crispens and buzzes shamefulness does not hold. | ¬({C}{b} & {D}{b}) | sent1: if something is not a scurrility that it is a kind of non-obvious thing that is not tough is not correct. sent2: if the cycle is not obvious the fact that it is a kind of a tough that does not buzz leprechaun does not hold. sent3: the cycle is not obvious. sent4: that the cycle is a kind of a tough that does buzz leprechaun is not correct. sent5: something does crispen if it is angular. sent6: if the cress is a kind of a tough then the cycle crispens. sent7: if that the cycle is tough but it does not buzz leprechaun is not correct then the fact that the cress buzzes shamefulness is not wrong. sent8: if something is non-angular and/or it is a kind of a hoe it does not crispen. sent9: if the cycle is not obvious that it is a tough that buzzes leprechaun does not hold. sent10: if something does not buzz leprechaun then the bacchant is not angular or it hoes or both. sent11: the cress is angular if the bacchant hoes. sent12: the cycle buzzes leprechaun if the cress is obvious. sent13: if that the corker is not obvious and it is not tough is not correct then the cycle does not buzz leprechaun. sent14: the bacchant is a hoe. | sent1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) sent2: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent3: ¬{G}{c} sent4: ¬({F}{c} & {E}{c}) sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: {F}{b} -> {C}{c} sent7: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {D}{b} sent8: (x): (¬{B}x v {A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent9: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬({F}{c} & {E}{c}) sent10: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}{a} v {A}{a}) sent11: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent12: {G}{b} -> {E}{c} sent13: ¬(¬{G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent14: {A}{a} | [
"sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the cress is not non-angular.; sent5 -> int2: if the cress is angular it crispens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cress does crispen.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the cycle is a tough but it does not buzz leprechaun is incorrect.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the cress buzzes shamefulness.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 & sent14 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{b}; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}); sent7 & int4 -> int5: {D}{b}; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the cress does crispen and does buzz shamefulness is wrong. | ¬({C}{b} & {D}{b}) | [
"sent8 -> int6: that the bacchant does not crispen is true if it is not angular and/or it does hoe.; sent1 -> int7: that the cleric is not obvious and it is not a kind of a tough is incorrect if it is not a kind of a scurrility.;"
]
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the cress crispens and buzzes shamefulness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a scurrility that it is a kind of non-obvious thing that is not tough is not correct. sent2: if the cycle is not obvious the fact that it is a kind of a tough that does not buzz leprechaun does not hold. sent3: the cycle is not obvious. sent4: that the cycle is a kind of a tough that does buzz leprechaun is not correct. sent5: something does crispen if it is angular. sent6: if the cress is a kind of a tough then the cycle crispens. sent7: if that the cycle is tough but it does not buzz leprechaun is not correct then the fact that the cress buzzes shamefulness is not wrong. sent8: if something is non-angular and/or it is a kind of a hoe it does not crispen. sent9: if the cycle is not obvious that it is a tough that buzzes leprechaun does not hold. sent10: if something does not buzz leprechaun then the bacchant is not angular or it hoes or both. sent11: the cress is angular if the bacchant hoes. sent12: the cycle buzzes leprechaun if the cress is obvious. sent13: if that the corker is not obvious and it is not tough is not correct then the cycle does not buzz leprechaun. sent14: the bacchant is a hoe. ; $proof$ = | sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the cress is not non-angular.; sent5 -> int2: if the cress is angular it crispens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the cress does crispen.; sent2 & sent3 -> int4: the fact that the cycle is a tough but it does not buzz leprechaun is incorrect.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the cress buzzes shamefulness.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the scrimshaw is a kind of a Dacelo. | {E}{c} | sent1: if the abomination is a kind of a VFW that is arteriosclerotic then the oneiromancer is not a kind of a penitentiary. sent2: if the abomination is not a Sawan then it is a VFW. sent3: the abomination is a coydog. sent4: the abomination is a kind of a mock. sent5: the diviner is a kind of a VFW. sent6: the scrimshaw is a VFW. sent7: the fact that something is not arteriosclerotic but it is a kind of a Dacelo does not hold if it is not a coydog. sent8: the shaper is a coydog. sent9: if the abomination is a kind of a coydog then it is arteriosclerotic. sent10: the hairpiece is not a kind of a penitentiary. sent11: the abomination is not a VFW if the oneiromancer is a kind of a penitentiary that is a Dacelo. sent12: if the abomination is not a Dacelo then the scrimshaw is a VFW. sent13: the abomination is rickettsial. sent14: something that is not a penitentiary is not a VFW and is not a coydog. sent15: if the oneiromancer is not a penitentiary then the scrimshaw is a Dacelo. sent16: the scrimshaw is a coydog. | sent1: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent2: ¬{F}{a} -> {C}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {FF}{a} sent5: {C}{bt} sent6: {C}{c} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {E}x) sent8: {A}{go} sent9: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: ¬{D}{gn} sent11: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: ¬{E}{a} -> {C}{c} sent13: {FG}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent15: ¬{D}{b} -> {E}{c} sent16: {A}{c} | [
"sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the abomination is arteriosclerotic.;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a};"
]
| the scrimshaw is not a kind of a Dacelo. | ¬{E}{c} | [
"sent14 -> int2: if the abomination is not a penitentiary it is not a VFW and it is not a coydog.; sent7 -> int3: if the scrimshaw is not a coydog the fact that it is not arteriosclerotic and it is a Dacelo is wrong.;"
]
| 7 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the scrimshaw is a kind of a Dacelo. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abomination is a kind of a VFW that is arteriosclerotic then the oneiromancer is not a kind of a penitentiary. sent2: if the abomination is not a Sawan then it is a VFW. sent3: the abomination is a coydog. sent4: the abomination is a kind of a mock. sent5: the diviner is a kind of a VFW. sent6: the scrimshaw is a VFW. sent7: the fact that something is not arteriosclerotic but it is a kind of a Dacelo does not hold if it is not a coydog. sent8: the shaper is a coydog. sent9: if the abomination is a kind of a coydog then it is arteriosclerotic. sent10: the hairpiece is not a kind of a penitentiary. sent11: the abomination is not a VFW if the oneiromancer is a kind of a penitentiary that is a Dacelo. sent12: if the abomination is not a Dacelo then the scrimshaw is a VFW. sent13: the abomination is rickettsial. sent14: something that is not a penitentiary is not a VFW and is not a coydog. sent15: if the oneiromancer is not a penitentiary then the scrimshaw is a Dacelo. sent16: the scrimshaw is a coydog. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the abomination is arteriosclerotic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it does repress emancipation and it is polymorphic it is not fissile. | (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: there is something such that if it represses emancipation and is polymorphic it is fissile. sent2: if a woman does coffin it is not a sifter. sent3: the churchyard is not grammatical if it is a troublemaker and lunges coneflower. sent4: if something represses emancipation and is polymorphic the fact that it is fissile is not incorrect. sent5: if the coneflower is fissile and it is electrophoretic it does not lunge neckpiece. sent6: there is something such that if it lunges Amen and it is patellar then it is not a rice. sent7: if the coneflower is nonretractile and it smiles scrutiny then it is not polymorphic. sent8: if something is mammalian and it is a shamefulness then it does not boil. sent9: if the coneflower is fissile and is electrophoretic it is not a kind of a toadflax. sent10: the coneflower is fissile if it represses emancipation and is polymorphic. sent11: the coneflower is not fissile if it is a collembolan that is disciplinary. sent12: there is something such that if it is an aftershock and it represses graze it does not buzz Tachyglossidae. sent13: if something that does repress emancipation is polymorphic it is not fissile. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a reciprocal and it is a fang then it is not a kind of an aftershock. | sent1: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: (x): ({CK}x & {FD}x) -> ¬{JA}x sent3: ({IQ}{jf} & {GP}{jf}) -> ¬{AK}{jf} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ({B}{aa} & {DC}{aa}) -> ¬{AL}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({AM}x & {ID}x) -> ¬{DK}x sent7: ({EK}{aa} & {EU}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent8: (x): ({CR}x & {EM}x) -> ¬{AQ}x sent9: ({B}{aa} & {DC}{aa}) -> ¬{HU}{aa} sent10: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent11: ({IJ}{aa} & {DF}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent12: (Ex): ({BR}x & {JF}x) -> ¬{GN}x sent13: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent14: (Ex): ({CJ}x & {BD}x) -> ¬{BR}x | [
"sent13 -> int1: if the coneflower does repress emancipation and is polymorphic then it is not fissile.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does repress emancipation and it is polymorphic it is not fissile. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it represses emancipation and is polymorphic it is fissile. sent2: if a woman does coffin it is not a sifter. sent3: the churchyard is not grammatical if it is a troublemaker and lunges coneflower. sent4: if something represses emancipation and is polymorphic the fact that it is fissile is not incorrect. sent5: if the coneflower is fissile and it is electrophoretic it does not lunge neckpiece. sent6: there is something such that if it lunges Amen and it is patellar then it is not a rice. sent7: if the coneflower is nonretractile and it smiles scrutiny then it is not polymorphic. sent8: if something is mammalian and it is a shamefulness then it does not boil. sent9: if the coneflower is fissile and is electrophoretic it is not a kind of a toadflax. sent10: the coneflower is fissile if it represses emancipation and is polymorphic. sent11: the coneflower is not fissile if it is a collembolan that is disciplinary. sent12: there is something such that if it is an aftershock and it represses graze it does not buzz Tachyglossidae. sent13: if something that does repress emancipation is polymorphic it is not fissile. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a reciprocal and it is a fang then it is not a kind of an aftershock. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> int1: if the coneflower does repress emancipation and is polymorphic then it is not fissile.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the Southeast does lunge fiddleneck is not incorrect. | {D}{a} | sent1: something is a estazolam and does buzz checksum. sent2: something that does fall does lunge fiddleneck. sent3: the bismark metabolizes. sent4: the Southeast is genuine. sent5: the editor is genuine. sent6: if something that is infectious is genuine then the stenopterygius lunges fiddleneck. sent7: if something is catholic then it is a anticholinergic. sent8: something is a Neofiber if it is anecdotal. sent9: if something is a kind of an infallibility but it is not an avenue it regales. sent10: something buzzes checksum and it does metabolize. sent11: the stenopterygius is both genuine and not noninfectious. sent12: something is genuine but it is not infectious if it is a fall. sent13: something is a shirtmaker that squelches. sent14: there is something such that it is infectious. sent15: that the Southeast is a fall is not incorrect if somethings are genuine and it is infectious. sent16: there is something such that it does buzz Chilomeniscus and is a Azerbaijani. sent17: the stenopterygius is infectious. sent18: there are genuine things. sent19: the hagfish falls if there is something such that it is a falls or not a surface or both. sent20: either something falls or it is not a surface or both if it does regale. sent21: if the bismark does metabolize then the mephenytoin is a kind of an infallibility that is not an avenue. | sent1: (Ex): ({ER}x & {HR}x) sent2: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent3: {I}{d} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {A}{f} sent6: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> {D}{aa} sent7: (x): {DE}x -> {CC}x sent8: (x): {EN}x -> {EO}x sent9: (x): ({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}x sent10: (Ex): ({HR}x & {I}x) sent11: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent12: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: (Ex): ({HM}x & {DS}x) sent14: (Ex): {B}x sent15: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent16: (Ex): ({BM}x & {DC}x) sent17: {B}{aa} sent18: (Ex): {A}x sent19: (x): ({C}x v ¬{E}x) -> {C}{b} sent20: (x): {F}x -> ({C}x v ¬{E}x) sent21: {I}{d} -> ({H}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: something is both genuine and infectious.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Southeast is a fall.; sent2 -> int3: the Southeast lunges fiddleneck if it is a fall.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int1 & sent15 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent2 -> int3: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Southeast does not lunge fiddleneck. | ¬{D}{a} | [
"sent12 -> int4: the hagfish is genuine but it is noninfectious if it falls.; sent20 -> int5: the mephenytoin does fall and/or it is not a kind of a surface if it regales.; sent9 -> int6: the fact that the mephenytoin does regale is true if it is an infallibility and is not a kind of an avenue.; sent21 & sent3 -> int7: the mephenytoin is an infallibility and is not an avenue.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the mephenytoin does regale.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the mephenytoin is a fall or it is not a surface or both.; int9 -> int10: something is a fall or it is not a surface or both.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the hagfish is a fall.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the hagfish is genuine but not infectious.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is genuine and not infectious.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Southeast does lunge fiddleneck is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a estazolam and does buzz checksum. sent2: something that does fall does lunge fiddleneck. sent3: the bismark metabolizes. sent4: the Southeast is genuine. sent5: the editor is genuine. sent6: if something that is infectious is genuine then the stenopterygius lunges fiddleneck. sent7: if something is catholic then it is a anticholinergic. sent8: something is a Neofiber if it is anecdotal. sent9: if something is a kind of an infallibility but it is not an avenue it regales. sent10: something buzzes checksum and it does metabolize. sent11: the stenopterygius is both genuine and not noninfectious. sent12: something is genuine but it is not infectious if it is a fall. sent13: something is a shirtmaker that squelches. sent14: there is something such that it is infectious. sent15: that the Southeast is a fall is not incorrect if somethings are genuine and it is infectious. sent16: there is something such that it does buzz Chilomeniscus and is a Azerbaijani. sent17: the stenopterygius is infectious. sent18: there are genuine things. sent19: the hagfish falls if there is something such that it is a falls or not a surface or both. sent20: either something falls or it is not a surface or both if it does regale. sent21: if the bismark does metabolize then the mephenytoin is a kind of an infallibility that is not an avenue. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: something is both genuine and infectious.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the Southeast is a fall.; sent2 -> int3: the Southeast lunges fiddleneck if it is a fall.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the differentiation lunges zaire and is not a hodman does not hold. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: the polybutylene is not centigrade if that the Cambodian is recoverable but not centigrade does not hold. sent2: the differentiation is a shrewdness and is not centigrade. sent3: if something is not centigrade it lunges zaire and is a shrewdness. sent4: if the fact that the fipple is a stiff and it is a iambic is false the fact that the pill is iambic is true. sent5: if the encaustic does not light then the fact that the fipple is both stiff and a iambic is false. sent6: the Cambodian is centigrade if the pill is centigrade. sent7: if something is not a kind of a iambic it is not unrecoverable and it is centigrade. sent8: if something does lunge pogonip then it does not light. sent9: if the Cambodian is not a shrewdness the differentiation does lunge zaire but it is not a hodman. sent10: the heretic is centigrade. sent11: something that is not non-centigrade is not a shrewdness. sent12: if the encaustic does not repress sialolith it lunges pogonip and is not irreversible. | sent1: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{cl} sent2: ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AA}x & {A}x) sent4: ¬({E}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬({E}{c} & {D}{c}) sent6: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): {G}x -> ¬{F}x sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: {B}{et} sent11: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x sent12: ¬{I}{d} -> ({G}{d} & {H}{d}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: the differentiation is a shrewdness.;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa};"
]
| the polybutylene lunges zaire. | {AA}{cl} | [
"sent3 -> int2: the polybutylene lunges zaire and it is a shrewdness if it is not centigrade.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the differentiation lunges zaire and is not a hodman does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the polybutylene is not centigrade if that the Cambodian is recoverable but not centigrade does not hold. sent2: the differentiation is a shrewdness and is not centigrade. sent3: if something is not centigrade it lunges zaire and is a shrewdness. sent4: if the fact that the fipple is a stiff and it is a iambic is false the fact that the pill is iambic is true. sent5: if the encaustic does not light then the fact that the fipple is both stiff and a iambic is false. sent6: the Cambodian is centigrade if the pill is centigrade. sent7: if something is not a kind of a iambic it is not unrecoverable and it is centigrade. sent8: if something does lunge pogonip then it does not light. sent9: if the Cambodian is not a shrewdness the differentiation does lunge zaire but it is not a hodman. sent10: the heretic is centigrade. sent11: something that is not non-centigrade is not a shrewdness. sent12: if the encaustic does not repress sialolith it lunges pogonip and is not irreversible. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the differentiation is a shrewdness.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the heading is not non-surfacing but anhydrous is incorrect. | ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: something does lunge gingham and represses thermometry if it is not a kind of an octave. sent2: the heading is anhydrous. sent3: the Vernier buzzes Broglie and is reticulate. sent4: the heading is not Chechen. sent5: the agglomerator is anhydrous. sent6: the infliximab is not surfacing. sent7: the spikemoss is a kind of a surfacing. sent8: the gnomon is a kind of a surfacing. sent9: the fact that the pyromaniac represses thermometry and it is anhydrous is false if it is not an octave. sent10: the heading does not repress ezo-yama-hagi. sent11: the variometer lunges gingham. sent12: if the heading is not unprotective then it lunges gingham. sent13: The gingham does not lunge heading. sent14: the heading does not lunge gingham. sent15: the heading is an octave. sent16: the heading is a neuroscientist if it is not a surfacing. sent17: if the heading does not lunge gingham then it is surfacing. sent18: the heading is a neuroscientist and it is emphysematous. | sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) sent2: {C}{a} sent3: ({GP}{fr} & {EN}{fr}) sent4: ¬{DK}{a} sent5: {C}{fj} sent6: ¬{B}{cs} sent7: {B}{aa} sent8: {B}{df} sent9: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent10: ¬{IL}{a} sent11: {A}{ie} sent12: ¬{HJ}{a} -> {A}{a} sent13: ¬{AA}{ab} sent14: ¬{A}{a} sent15: {E}{a} sent16: ¬{B}{a} -> {IR}{a} sent17: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent18: ({IR}{a} & {EB}{a}) | [
"sent17 & sent14 -> int1: the heading surfaces.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent17 & sent14 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the brickbat is a surfacing. | {B}{if} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the heading is not non-surfacing but anhydrous is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something does lunge gingham and represses thermometry if it is not a kind of an octave. sent2: the heading is anhydrous. sent3: the Vernier buzzes Broglie and is reticulate. sent4: the heading is not Chechen. sent5: the agglomerator is anhydrous. sent6: the infliximab is not surfacing. sent7: the spikemoss is a kind of a surfacing. sent8: the gnomon is a kind of a surfacing. sent9: the fact that the pyromaniac represses thermometry and it is anhydrous is false if it is not an octave. sent10: the heading does not repress ezo-yama-hagi. sent11: the variometer lunges gingham. sent12: if the heading is not unprotective then it lunges gingham. sent13: The gingham does not lunge heading. sent14: the heading does not lunge gingham. sent15: the heading is an octave. sent16: the heading is a neuroscientist if it is not a surfacing. sent17: if the heading does not lunge gingham then it is surfacing. sent18: the heading is a neuroscientist and it is emphysematous. ; $proof$ = | sent17 & sent14 -> int1: the heading surfaces.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the ski-plane is not a nonpartisan. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: the ski-plane is a interrogative. sent2: a interrogative and nonpartisan thing does not buzz infamy. sent3: everything is a kind of non-milch thing that is a Agastache. sent4: if the photostat buzzes infamy and is a Platypoecilus then it is hadal. | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) sent4: ({C}{ea} & {II}{ea}) -> {ET}{ea} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ski-plane is a nonpartisan.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the ski-plane is a interrogative and it is a nonpartisan.; sent2 -> int2: if the ski-plane is both a interrogative and a nonpartisan then it does not buzz infamy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ski-plane does not buzz infamy.; sent3 -> int4: the ski-plane is not milch but a Agastache.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {B}{a}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent2 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; sent3 -> int4: (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a});"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 4 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the ski-plane is not a nonpartisan. ; $context$ = sent1: the ski-plane is a interrogative. sent2: a interrogative and nonpartisan thing does not buzz infamy. sent3: everything is a kind of non-milch thing that is a Agastache. sent4: if the photostat buzzes infamy and is a Platypoecilus then it is hadal. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ski-plane is a nonpartisan.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the ski-plane is a interrogative and it is a nonpartisan.; sent2 -> int2: if the ski-plane is both a interrogative and a nonpartisan then it does not buzz infamy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ski-plane does not buzz infamy.; sent3 -> int4: the ski-plane is not milch but a Agastache.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the larva extravasates is correct. | {B}{a} | sent1: the bullfighter is aft if it is not unhealthful. sent2: if something that is not non-aft does not intimate then the larva is not a kind of a concessionaire. sent3: there exists something such that it is aft and does not intimate. sent4: something does not extravasate and does mantle Wood if it is not a concessionaire. sent5: there is something such that it is a biodiversity. sent6: if the dumbwaiter does not refrigerate ironworker then it is not aft and it gurgles fluorite. | sent1: ¬{GO}{if} -> {AA}{if} sent2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) sent5: (Ex): {IP}x sent6: ¬{P}{hc} -> (¬{AA}{hc} & {DT}{hc}) | [
"sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the larva is not a concessionaire.; sent4 -> int2: the larva does not extravasate but it mantles Wood if it is not a concessionaire.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the larva does not extravasate and mantles Wood.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent4 -> int2: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the larva extravasates is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the bullfighter is aft if it is not unhealthful. sent2: if something that is not non-aft does not intimate then the larva is not a kind of a concessionaire. sent3: there exists something such that it is aft and does not intimate. sent4: something does not extravasate and does mantle Wood if it is not a concessionaire. sent5: there is something such that it is a biodiversity. sent6: if the dumbwaiter does not refrigerate ironworker then it is not aft and it gurgles fluorite. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the larva is not a concessionaire.; sent4 -> int2: the larva does not extravasate but it mantles Wood if it is not a concessionaire.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the larva does not extravasate and mantles Wood.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pentaerythritol does mantle searcher. | {A}{a} | sent1: if that the tux does not lose and/or is Uzbekistani is incorrect then the pentaerythritol does not lose. sent2: if something does not mantle searcher then the fact that it is matutinal and/or it is a kind of a sou is not true. sent3: if something does not lose but it is an administration then it mantles searcher. sent4: the fact that the Leonberg is a kind of a giving or it is autoradiographic or both is wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that that either it is a giving or it is not non-autoradiographic or both is incorrect then the pentaerythritol does not mantle searcher. | sent1: ¬(¬{B}{c} v {F}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({EC}x v {DC}x) sent3: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {A}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it gives or it is autoradiographic or both does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x); int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the pentaerythritol mantles searcher. | {A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int2: the pentaerythritol does mantle searcher if it does not lose and it is an administration.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pentaerythritol does mantle searcher. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the tux does not lose and/or is Uzbekistani is incorrect then the pentaerythritol does not lose. sent2: if something does not mantle searcher then the fact that it is matutinal and/or it is a kind of a sou is not true. sent3: if something does not lose but it is an administration then it mantles searcher. sent4: the fact that the Leonberg is a kind of a giving or it is autoradiographic or both is wrong. sent5: if there exists something such that that either it is a giving or it is not non-autoradiographic or both is incorrect then the pentaerythritol does not mantle searcher. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it gives or it is autoradiographic or both does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Weizenbock is not a wave. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: there exists something such that that it is a Septobasidium but not an executive is wrong. sent2: the presentist espouses and it gurgles sunbeam. sent3: the fact that the fact that the presentist is regimentals is true if the fact that the presentist does espouse is not wrong is right. sent4: the Weizenbock is not a kind of a Kahlua if there is something such that the fact that it is impermissible and it is not a wave is wrong. sent5: there is something such that that that it is a kind of a Septobasidium that is an executive is correct does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it does append and it does not gurgle presentist. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Septobasidium and not an executive does not hold then the fact that the Weizenbock is not a wave is correct. sent8: something is a wave and/or it is central if it is not cubist. sent9: there is something such that it is a gag that does not gurgle sunbeam. sent10: if something is regimentals the fact that the Chaldean is a croak and is cubist is false. sent11: if the fact that something croaks and is a kind of a cubist does not hold then it is not cubist. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: ({F}{c} & {G}{c}) sent3: {F}{c} -> {E}{c} sent4: (x): ¬({IH}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{HA}{a} sent5: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (Ex): ({EN}x & ¬{CC}x) sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v {B}x) sent9: (Ex): ({AG}x & ¬{G}x) sent10: (x): {E}x -> ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent11: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Weizenbock is a kind of a wave. | {A}{a} | [
"sent8 -> int1: if the Chaldean is non-cubist it is a kind of a wave and/or it is central.; sent11 -> int2: the Chaldean is not a cubist if the fact that it is a croak and it is a cubist does not hold.; sent2 -> int3: the presentist espouses.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the presentist is regimentals.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is regimentals.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the Chaldean does croak and it is a cubist is right is not correct.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the Chaldean is not cubist.; int1 & int7 -> int8: the Chaldean is a kind of a wave and/or it is a kind of a central.; int8 -> int9: something waves and/or it is a central.;"
]
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Weizenbock is not a wave. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a Septobasidium but not an executive is wrong. sent2: the presentist espouses and it gurgles sunbeam. sent3: the fact that the fact that the presentist is regimentals is true if the fact that the presentist does espouse is not wrong is right. sent4: the Weizenbock is not a kind of a Kahlua if there is something such that the fact that it is impermissible and it is not a wave is wrong. sent5: there is something such that that that it is a kind of a Septobasidium that is an executive is correct does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it does append and it does not gurgle presentist. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is both a Septobasidium and not an executive does not hold then the fact that the Weizenbock is not a wave is correct. sent8: something is a wave and/or it is central if it is not cubist. sent9: there is something such that it is a gag that does not gurgle sunbeam. sent10: if something is regimentals the fact that the Chaldean is a croak and is cubist is false. sent11: if the fact that something croaks and is a kind of a cubist does not hold then it is not cubist. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the example does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the splenectomy occurs. sent2: the demurrage does not occur but the punishment occurs if the chancellorship does not occur. sent3: if the demurrage does not occur then that the mantling legionnaire does not occur and the salpingectomy does not occur is not right. sent4: that the gurgling pecan happens but the jousting does not occur is incorrect if the mantling legionnaire occurs. sent5: the gurgling Ojibwa happens. sent6: if that the gurgling pecan happens but the jousting does not occur is not true that the gurgling pecan does not occur hold. sent7: that that the gurgling Ojibwa occurs and the example happens is not incorrect does not hold if the gurgling pecan does not occur. sent8: the mantling Prionotus occurs. sent9: the example does not occur if the mantling Prionotus and the gurgling Ojibwa happens. sent10: both the overbearing and the ineligibleness occurs. sent11: that the single occurs and the allegiance happens causes the unopposableness. sent12: the erection occurs. sent13: if that the mantling legionnaire does not occur and the salpingectomy does not occur is not true the mantling legionnaire occurs. sent14: both the example and the mantling Prionotus happens if the gurgling Ojibwa does not occur. sent15: the allegiance and the gurgling Syrian happens. sent16: if the gurgling Ojibwa does not occur then the autoradiographicness occurs and the mantling Prionotus occurs. | sent1: {BI} sent2: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) sent3: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent4: {F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E}) sent5: {B} sent6: ¬({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} sent7: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & {C}) sent8: {A} sent9: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent10: ({BJ} & {DC}) sent11: ({AP} & {GR}) -> ¬{EK} sent12: {BK} sent13: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) -> {F} sent14: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent15: ({GR} & {HR}) sent16: ¬{B} -> ({DK} & {A}) | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the mantling Prionotus happens and the gurgling Ojibwa occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the example happens. | {C} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the example does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the splenectomy occurs. sent2: the demurrage does not occur but the punishment occurs if the chancellorship does not occur. sent3: if the demurrage does not occur then that the mantling legionnaire does not occur and the salpingectomy does not occur is not right. sent4: that the gurgling pecan happens but the jousting does not occur is incorrect if the mantling legionnaire occurs. sent5: the gurgling Ojibwa happens. sent6: if that the gurgling pecan happens but the jousting does not occur is not true that the gurgling pecan does not occur hold. sent7: that that the gurgling Ojibwa occurs and the example happens is not incorrect does not hold if the gurgling pecan does not occur. sent8: the mantling Prionotus occurs. sent9: the example does not occur if the mantling Prionotus and the gurgling Ojibwa happens. sent10: both the overbearing and the ineligibleness occurs. sent11: that the single occurs and the allegiance happens causes the unopposableness. sent12: the erection occurs. sent13: if that the mantling legionnaire does not occur and the salpingectomy does not occur is not true the mantling legionnaire occurs. sent14: both the example and the mantling Prionotus happens if the gurgling Ojibwa does not occur. sent15: the allegiance and the gurgling Syrian happens. sent16: if the gurgling Ojibwa does not occur then the autoradiographicness occurs and the mantling Prionotus occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent5 -> int1: the mantling Prionotus happens and the gurgling Ojibwa occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pylon is not non-erythropoietic. | {B}{a} | sent1: the pylon is a winceyette. sent2: the pylon is a winceyette but it is not a kind of a Monsieur. sent3: something that either does not preponderate or mantles sunbeam or both does not preponderate. sent4: if the fact that the pleurothallis is not serious but it does gurgle self-preservation is incorrect it is not a Konqueror. sent5: if the rush-grass does not gurgle pastorship then the luger is a kind of a Delichon. sent6: if the pylon is a winceyette but it is not a Monsieur then it is not erythropoietic. sent7: something does not mantle hint if that that it mantle hint and it does gurgle pastorship is not wrong does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a Blighia and a Delichon is not correct. sent9: the sallow does not preponderate and/or mantles sunbeam if the pleurothallis is not a Konqueror. sent10: if the larva is not a kind of a consolidation then the fact that the pleurothallis is non-serious thing that does gurgle self-preservation is incorrect. sent11: the pylon is erythropoietic if that the smoker does not attest but it is hydric is not right. sent12: if the smoker does not mantle hint then the pylon is a kind of hydric thing that attests. sent13: if there is something such that that it is not a Blighia but a Delichon is false then the luger does not mantle hint. sent14: if something is a Delichon then it does mantle hint. sent15: the elements is not erythropoietic. sent16: the pylon is sectarian but it is not a electrolyte. sent17: the fact that the smoker does not attest and is hydric is not true if the luger does mantle hint. sent18: that the pylon does not refrigerate dactyl is not wrong. sent19: the ostiole is not a Blighia if either the sallow is not a halfpennyworth or it does not preponderate or both. sent20: the scalpel is not erythropoietic. sent21: the pylon is both formalistic and not pyrogenic. | sent1: {AA}{a} sent2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: (x): (¬{I}x v {J}x) -> ¬{I}x sent4: ¬(¬{L}{g} & {M}{g}) -> ¬{K}{g} sent5: ¬{F}{d} -> {E}{c} sent6: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬({D}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent8: (Ex): ¬(¬{G}x & {E}x) sent9: ¬{K}{g} -> (¬{I}{f} v {J}{f}) sent10: ¬{N}{h} -> ¬(¬{L}{g} & {M}{g}) sent11: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent12: ¬{D}{b} -> ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) sent13: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}{c} sent14: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent15: ¬{B}{jc} sent16: ({BD}{a} & ¬{ER}{a}) sent17: {D}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) sent18: ¬{IR}{a} sent19: (¬{H}{f} v ¬{I}{f}) -> ¬{G}{e} sent20: ¬{B}{bj} sent21: ({CL}{a} & ¬{GN}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the pylon is erythropoietic. | {B}{a} | [
"sent14 -> int1: the fact that the luger does mantle hint is not incorrect if it is a kind of a Delichon.; sent3 -> int2: if the fact that either the sallow does not preponderate or it does mantle sunbeam or both is not incorrect it does not preponderate.;"
]
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pylon is not non-erythropoietic. ; $context$ = sent1: the pylon is a winceyette. sent2: the pylon is a winceyette but it is not a kind of a Monsieur. sent3: something that either does not preponderate or mantles sunbeam or both does not preponderate. sent4: if the fact that the pleurothallis is not serious but it does gurgle self-preservation is incorrect it is not a Konqueror. sent5: if the rush-grass does not gurgle pastorship then the luger is a kind of a Delichon. sent6: if the pylon is a winceyette but it is not a Monsieur then it is not erythropoietic. sent7: something does not mantle hint if that that it mantle hint and it does gurgle pastorship is not wrong does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a Blighia and a Delichon is not correct. sent9: the sallow does not preponderate and/or mantles sunbeam if the pleurothallis is not a Konqueror. sent10: if the larva is not a kind of a consolidation then the fact that the pleurothallis is non-serious thing that does gurgle self-preservation is incorrect. sent11: the pylon is erythropoietic if that the smoker does not attest but it is hydric is not right. sent12: if the smoker does not mantle hint then the pylon is a kind of hydric thing that attests. sent13: if there is something such that that it is not a Blighia but a Delichon is false then the luger does not mantle hint. sent14: if something is a Delichon then it does mantle hint. sent15: the elements is not erythropoietic. sent16: the pylon is sectarian but it is not a electrolyte. sent17: the fact that the smoker does not attest and is hydric is not true if the luger does mantle hint. sent18: that the pylon does not refrigerate dactyl is not wrong. sent19: the ostiole is not a Blighia if either the sallow is not a halfpennyworth or it does not preponderate or both. sent20: the scalpel is not erythropoietic. sent21: the pylon is both formalistic and not pyrogenic. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the toque is not cyclopean. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the toque is not cyclopean if there is something such that the fact that it does not enumerate and is a naprapathy does not hold. sent2: there is something such that that it does not enumerate and it is a naprapathy is incorrect. sent3: something that is algal is cyclopean. sent4: something is algal if it refrigerates peel. sent5: the toque is algal if the branch is algal. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Grainger and is a eggbeater is not right. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent4: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent5: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent6: (Ex): ¬({BI}x & {AC}x) | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the toque is cyclopean. | {A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the toque is cyclopean if it is algal.; sent4 -> int2: if the branch refrigerates peel the fact that it is algal is not wrong.;"
]
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the toque is not cyclopean. ; $context$ = sent1: the toque is not cyclopean if there is something such that the fact that it does not enumerate and is a naprapathy does not hold. sent2: there is something such that that it does not enumerate and it is a naprapathy is incorrect. sent3: something that is algal is cyclopean. sent4: something is algal if it refrigerates peel. sent5: the toque is algal if the branch is algal. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Grainger and is a eggbeater is not right. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the vasodilator is not a self-induction. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: that if the fact that the vasodilator is a self-induction that does not mantle disparity does not hold then the plastron is a self-induction is correct. sent2: the vasodilator is biomedical. sent3: the vasodilator is a self-induction. sent4: that something is a self-induction and does not mantle disparity is not right if it is a consideration. sent5: the brooding is a self-induction. sent6: the Egyptologist is a self-induction. sent7: the vasodilator is theological. sent8: the prospectus is a self-induction. sent9: if something that is not a hag is a acidophil then it is a consideration. | sent1: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {A}{dc} sent2: {DR}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): {C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent5: {A}{ha} sent6: {A}{dp} sent7: {BH}{a} sent8: {A}{bm} sent9: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> {C}x | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the plastron is a kind of a self-induction. | {A}{dc} | [
"sent4 -> int1: that the fact that the vasodilator is a kind of a self-induction but it does not mantle disparity does not hold is not wrong if it is a consideration.; sent9 -> int2: if the vasodilator is not a hag but a acidophil it is a consideration.;"
]
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the vasodilator is not a self-induction. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the fact that the vasodilator is a self-induction that does not mantle disparity does not hold then the plastron is a self-induction is correct. sent2: the vasodilator is biomedical. sent3: the vasodilator is a self-induction. sent4: that something is a self-induction and does not mantle disparity is not right if it is a consideration. sent5: the brooding is a self-induction. sent6: the Egyptologist is a self-induction. sent7: the vasodilator is theological. sent8: the prospectus is a self-induction. sent9: if something that is not a hag is a acidophil then it is a consideration. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the sheller is not a hash. | ¬{D}{a} | sent1: if something that does not refrigerate jockey hashes then it does not restore. sent2: if the sheller refrigerates coldness or it restores or both it does not hash. sent3: the sheller is not a hash if it does restore. sent4: the sheller is a kind of biosystematics thing that does refrigerate coldness. | sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent2: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent3: {C}{a} -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the sheller does refrigerate coldness.; int1 -> int2: the sheller either refrigerates coldness or does restore or both.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the urokinase is not biosystematics. | ¬{A}{eu} | [
"sent1 -> int3: if the sheller does not refrigerate jockey but it is a hash it does not restore.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the sheller is not a hash. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not refrigerate jockey hashes then it does not restore. sent2: if the sheller refrigerates coldness or it restores or both it does not hash. sent3: the sheller is not a hash if it does restore. sent4: the sheller is a kind of biosystematics thing that does refrigerate coldness. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the sheller does refrigerate coldness.; int1 -> int2: the sheller either refrigerates coldness or does restore or both.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the heliopause gurgles Agamidae and is a parable. | ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) | sent1: if something is not a kind of a Gruyere then it is not triumphal. sent2: the pogonia is not a Jeffersonian. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a hunt and it is not unnatural is not right if it is superjacent. sent4: the fact that the fritter is fruitful and it mantles monotony is not true. sent5: if that the demitasse is not triumphal is not false then that the heliopause does gurgle Agamidae and it is a parable is false. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Gruyere hold if it is not antemeridian and does distinguish. sent7: that the fact that the pogonia does overprotect and is not a kind of a dock is not false is not correct if that it is not a Jeffersonian hold. sent8: the heliopause gurgles Agamidae if it mantles Linux. sent9: the bladdernose is a parable. sent10: something gurgles Agamidae if that it is a kind of a testator that does not mantle Linux is false. sent11: if that something does mantle Linux but it is not a kind of a testator is not correct it is a kind of a parable. sent12: the heliopause is a parable and is triumphal. sent13: if the fact that the pogonia does overprotect and is not a kind of a dock is false then it is superjacent. sent14: something is not antemeridian but it distinguishes if it hunts. | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: ¬{L}{b} sent3: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) sent4: ¬({FO}{fc} & {FG}{fc}) sent5: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent6: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent7: ¬{L}{b} -> ¬({K}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) sent8: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent9: {A}{ap} sent10: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent11: (x): ¬({AB}x & ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x sent12: ({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent13: ¬({K}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) -> {I}{b} sent14: (x): {G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the heliopause does gurgle Agamidae if that it is a testator and it does not mantle Linux is not true.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the heliopause is a parable is not wrong.;"
]
| [
"sent10 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent12 -> int2: {A}{aa};"
]
| the fact that the heliopause does gurgle Agamidae and it is a parable is not right. | ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) | [
"sent1 -> int3: if the demitasse is not a Gruyere then it is not triumphal.; sent6 -> int4: if the demitasse is not antemeridian and distinguishes then it is not a Gruyere.; sent14 -> int5: if the demitasse is a kind of a hunt then the fact that it is not antemeridian and it does distinguish is correct.; sent3 -> int6: if the pogonia is superjacent then that it does not hunt and it is not unnatural does not hold.; sent7 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the pogonia does overprotect but it does not dock is not true.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the pogonia is superjacent.; int6 & int8 -> int9: that the pogonia is not a hunt and it is not unnatural is not true.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is both not a hunt and not unnatural is incorrect.;"
]
| 9 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the heliopause gurgles Agamidae and is a parable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Gruyere then it is not triumphal. sent2: the pogonia is not a Jeffersonian. sent3: the fact that something is not a kind of a hunt and it is not unnatural is not right if it is superjacent. sent4: the fact that the fritter is fruitful and it mantles monotony is not true. sent5: if that the demitasse is not triumphal is not false then that the heliopause does gurgle Agamidae and it is a parable is false. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a Gruyere hold if it is not antemeridian and does distinguish. sent7: that the fact that the pogonia does overprotect and is not a kind of a dock is not false is not correct if that it is not a Jeffersonian hold. sent8: the heliopause gurgles Agamidae if it mantles Linux. sent9: the bladdernose is a parable. sent10: something gurgles Agamidae if that it is a kind of a testator that does not mantle Linux is false. sent11: if that something does mantle Linux but it is not a kind of a testator is not correct it is a kind of a parable. sent12: the heliopause is a parable and is triumphal. sent13: if the fact that the pogonia does overprotect and is not a kind of a dock is false then it is superjacent. sent14: something is not antemeridian but it distinguishes if it hunts. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: the heliopause does gurgle Agamidae if that it is a testator and it does not mantle Linux is not true.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the heliopause is a parable is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the agglomerating does not occur and the comparison does not occur. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: that the agglomerate does not occur and the comparison does not occur is false if that the glorification does not occur is not false. sent2: if the fact that the gurgling bible occurs is not wrong then not the glorification but the tegularness occurs. sent3: the incorporating occurs and the refrigerating speciousness occurs. sent4: the tegularness occurs and the glorification happens. sent5: that the hysterotomy does not occur triggers that the ambassadorialness does not occur and the gurgling bible occurs. sent6: if the glorification does not occur then the thermostaticsness does not occur and the masterpiece does not occur. sent7: the aeroembolism does not occur. | sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) sent3: ({CR} & {DC}) sent4: ({B} & {A}) sent5: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & {C}) sent6: ¬{A} -> (¬{CU} & ¬{EU}) sent7: ¬{BK} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the agglomerating does not occur and the comparison does not occur does not hold.; sent4 -> int1: the tegularness happens.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); sent4 -> int1: {B};"
]
| the thermostaticsness does not occur and the masterpiece does not occur. | (¬{CU} & ¬{EU}) | []
| 8 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the agglomerating does not occur and the comparison does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the agglomerate does not occur and the comparison does not occur is false if that the glorification does not occur is not false. sent2: if the fact that the gurgling bible occurs is not wrong then not the glorification but the tegularness occurs. sent3: the incorporating occurs and the refrigerating speciousness occurs. sent4: the tegularness occurs and the glorification happens. sent5: that the hysterotomy does not occur triggers that the ambassadorialness does not occur and the gurgling bible occurs. sent6: if the glorification does not occur then the thermostaticsness does not occur and the masterpiece does not occur. sent7: the aeroembolism does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the agglomerating does not occur and the comparison does not occur does not hold.; sent4 -> int1: the tegularness happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the anemicness happens. | {A} | sent1: the refrigerating VA occurs and the reversibleness happens if the gurgling neurolinguist does not occur. sent2: both the ballup and the congruentness occurs if the discordantness does not occur. sent3: if the refrigerating VA occurs the fact that the discordantness does not occur is true. sent4: the fact that the wiseness does not occur is not false. sent5: that the ballup does not occur is right. sent6: if that the ballup does not occur hold the fact that the anemicness does not occur and the Jordanianness occurs is incorrect. | sent1: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent2: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent3: {F} -> ¬{E} sent4: ¬{JK} sent5: ¬{C} sent6: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anemicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int1: that the anemicness does not occur and the Jordanian happens is not right.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent6 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{A} & {B});"
]
| the anemicness does not occur. | ¬{A} | []
| 8 | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the anemicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the refrigerating VA occurs and the reversibleness happens if the gurgling neurolinguist does not occur. sent2: both the ballup and the congruentness occurs if the discordantness does not occur. sent3: if the refrigerating VA occurs the fact that the discordantness does not occur is true. sent4: the fact that the wiseness does not occur is not false. sent5: that the ballup does not occur is right. sent6: if that the ballup does not occur hold the fact that the anemicness does not occur and the Jordanianness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anemicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int1: that the anemicness does not occur and the Jordanian happens is not right.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the loop is a kind of a Malthusian that is scrotal. | ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) | sent1: the flooring is not Brobdingnagian and is a spallation. sent2: there is something such that that it does gurgle nonresident is not incorrect. sent3: something is a kind of a Malthusian and it is irresolute if it is not subsonic. sent4: that the nosh does gurgle nonresident but it does not gurgle nosh is incorrect if the Marks is not a rhizotomy. sent5: if there is something such that it does gurgle nonresident the loop is not subsonic. sent6: the fact that the flooring is subsonic is right if there exists something such that that it is not a rustling and is scrotal is false. sent7: the fact that the loop is not a rustling but it is scrotal is not true if there is something such that it is Malthusian. sent8: the hilus does not gurgle nonresident if there is something such that that it gurgle nonresident and it does not gurgle nosh is not correct. sent9: if the flooring is non-Brobdingnagian and a spallation then it is not a rustling. sent10: that the Marks is not a rhizotomy is not false. | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent2: (Ex): {F}x sent3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) sent4: ¬{H}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent5: (x): {F}x -> ¬{E}{b} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {E}{a} sent7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{F}{c} sent9: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent10: ¬{H}{e} | [
"sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the flooring is not a kind of a rustling.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a rustling.; sent3 -> int3: if the loop is not subsonic then it is a Malthusian that is irresolute.; sent2 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the loop is subsonic hold is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the loop is a Malthusian and it is irresolute.; int5 -> int6: the loop is a kind of a Malthusian.;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬{B}x; sent3 -> int3: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{b} & {D}{b}); sent2 & sent5 -> int4: ¬{E}{b}; int3 & int4 -> int5: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}); int5 -> int6: {C}{b};"
]
| the flooring is subsonic. | {E}{a} | [
"sent4 & sent10 -> int7: that the nosh does gurgle nonresident but it does not gurgle nosh is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it does gurgle nonresident and does not gurgle nosh does not hold.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the hilus does not gurgle nonresident.;"
]
| 9 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the loop is a kind of a Malthusian that is scrotal. ; $context$ = sent1: the flooring is not Brobdingnagian and is a spallation. sent2: there is something such that that it does gurgle nonresident is not incorrect. sent3: something is a kind of a Malthusian and it is irresolute if it is not subsonic. sent4: that the nosh does gurgle nonresident but it does not gurgle nosh is incorrect if the Marks is not a rhizotomy. sent5: if there is something such that it does gurgle nonresident the loop is not subsonic. sent6: the fact that the flooring is subsonic is right if there exists something such that that it is not a rustling and is scrotal is false. sent7: the fact that the loop is not a rustling but it is scrotal is not true if there is something such that it is Malthusian. sent8: the hilus does not gurgle nonresident if there is something such that that it gurgle nonresident and it does not gurgle nosh is not correct. sent9: if the flooring is non-Brobdingnagian and a spallation then it is not a rustling. sent10: that the Marks is not a rhizotomy is not false. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the flooring is not a kind of a rustling.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a rustling.; sent3 -> int3: if the loop is not subsonic then it is a Malthusian that is irresolute.; sent2 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the loop is subsonic hold is not right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the loop is a Malthusian and it is irresolute.; int5 -> int6: the loop is a kind of a Malthusian.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the plastron is a pylon and is shambolic. | ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) | sent1: if something is not a pylon it is ergotic and is a kind of a homefolk. sent2: the plastron is not a chordate. sent3: something does hate. sent4: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hate that the plastron is a homefolk but not isolationist does not hold. sent5: the fact that if the fact that something is a kind of a homefolk that is not a kind of an isolationist is not true it is a kind of a pylon is correct. sent6: if something does not hate then it is a kind of a thyroid. sent7: if the isoantibody is a hate and is an isolationist the plastron is not a hate. sent8: the plastron is a pylon if the fact that it is not a homefolk is correct. sent9: the plastron is a homefolk if it is not a kind of a good. sent10: the plastron is shambolic and it does gurgle beetroot if it is not chordate. | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({BR}x & {B}x) sent2: ¬{G}{a} sent3: (Ex): {A}x sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> {FM}x sent7: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ¬{AP}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the plastron is a homefolk but it is not an isolationist is false.; sent5 -> int2: the plastron is a pylon if that it is both a homefolk and not an isolationist is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plastron is a pylon.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: the plastron is shambolic and it gurgles beetroot.; int4 -> int5: the plastron is shambolic.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent5 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {D}{a}; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: ({E}{a} & {F}{a}); int4 -> int5: {E}{a}; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the plastron is ergotic and it is a thyroid. | ({BR}{a} & {FM}{a}) | [
"sent1 -> int6: if the plastron is not a kind of a pylon then it is not non-ergotic and it is a kind of a homefolk.; sent6 -> int7: the fact that the plastron is a kind of a thyroid is not false if the fact that it does not hate hold.;"
]
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the plastron is a pylon and is shambolic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a pylon it is ergotic and is a kind of a homefolk. sent2: the plastron is not a chordate. sent3: something does hate. sent4: if there is something such that it is a kind of a hate that the plastron is a homefolk but not isolationist does not hold. sent5: the fact that if the fact that something is a kind of a homefolk that is not a kind of an isolationist is not true it is a kind of a pylon is correct. sent6: if something does not hate then it is a kind of a thyroid. sent7: if the isoantibody is a hate and is an isolationist the plastron is not a hate. sent8: the plastron is a pylon if the fact that it is not a homefolk is correct. sent9: the plastron is a homefolk if it is not a kind of a good. sent10: the plastron is shambolic and it does gurgle beetroot if it is not chordate. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the plastron is a homefolk but it is not an isolationist is false.; sent5 -> int2: the plastron is a pylon if that it is both a homefolk and not an isolationist is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plastron is a pylon.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: the plastron is shambolic and it gurgles beetroot.; int4 -> int5: the plastron is shambolic.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Warner touches. | {A}{b} | sent1: the fact that the see is not a stainer and is a redbelly is false. sent2: if the see does mantle beroe the Warner is a touched. sent3: the see does mantle beroe if the fact that it is not a kind of a stainer and it is a redbelly is not correct. sent4: if the see is a stainer then it does mantle beroe. sent5: there exists nothing such that it does ice and it is a Iridoprocne. sent6: if the see is a touched then the Warner is a stainer. sent7: if something that does not plumb does mantle beroe the Warner is not a touched. sent8: something is a redbelly if it does touch. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent2: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} sent5: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) sent6: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} sent7: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}{b} sent8: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the see mantles beroe.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Warner does not touch. | ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int2: the fact that the simpleton is an icing and is a Iridoprocne is not true.;"
]
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Warner touches. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the see is not a stainer and is a redbelly is false. sent2: if the see does mantle beroe the Warner is a touched. sent3: the see does mantle beroe if the fact that it is not a kind of a stainer and it is a redbelly is not correct. sent4: if the see is a stainer then it does mantle beroe. sent5: there exists nothing such that it does ice and it is a Iridoprocne. sent6: if the see is a touched then the Warner is a stainer. sent7: if something that does not plumb does mantle beroe the Warner is not a touched. sent8: something is a redbelly if it does touch. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the see mantles beroe.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the twiner refrigerates Rachmaninoff. | {C}{c} | sent1: the twiner either is a patient or is distant or both. sent2: the cefadroxil is not a Palaic. sent3: the twiner is a Palaic if that it does refrigerate Rachmaninoff is not false. sent4: that the lark refrigerates Rachmaninoff is not incorrect if the twiner does arrange. sent5: the cefadroxil subtilizes. sent6: the twiner is distant if the lark arranges. sent7: if the lark does not arrange the twiner is a patient and/or it is distant. sent8: the cefadroxil does arrange. sent9: either the lark is distant or it does arrange or both if the twiner is not a Palaic. sent10: the cefadroxil is distant if the lark arranges. sent11: the twiner arranges if the lark does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent12: the cefadroxil does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent13: if the lark is patient then it is a Palaic. sent14: that the lark is a catastrophe is right. sent15: the pantile is a Palaic. sent16: if the lark does not arrange either the twiner does refrigerate Rachmaninoff or it is a Palaic or both. sent17: if the lark is patient then the twiner is distant. sent18: if the fact that the twiner is a kind of a hagberry but it is not Piagetian is not correct it is a placebo. sent19: the lark is distant and/or is a patient. sent20: the twiner is a kind of a patient if the lark does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent21: the cefadroxil is a Palaic if it is a patient. sent22: if the cefadroxil is not a Palaic the lark either arranges or is a patient or both. sent23: that either something is not distant or it is not a Palaic or both is false if it is an import. sent24: if something is a placebo it is an import. | sent1: ({AB}{c} v {B}{c}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: {C}{c} -> {A}{c} sent4: {AA}{c} -> {C}{b} sent5: {BG}{a} sent6: {AA}{b} -> {B}{c} sent7: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({AB}{c} v {B}{c}) sent8: {AA}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{c} -> ({B}{b} v {AA}{b}) sent10: {AA}{b} -> {B}{a} sent11: {C}{b} -> {AA}{c} sent12: {C}{a} sent13: {AB}{b} -> {A}{b} sent14: {IJ}{b} sent15: {A}{hr} sent16: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({C}{c} v {A}{c}) sent17: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} sent18: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> {E}{c} sent19: ({B}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent20: {C}{b} -> {AB}{c} sent21: {AB}{a} -> {A}{a} sent22: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent23: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) sent24: (x): {E}x -> {D}x | [
"sent22 & sent2 -> int1: the lark does arrange or it is a kind of a patient or both.; int1 & sent6 & sent17 -> int2: the twiner is distant.;"
]
| [
"sent22 & sent2 -> int1: ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); int1 & sent6 & sent17 -> int2: {B}{c};"
]
| the twiner does not refrigerate Rachmaninoff. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"sent23 -> int3: the fact that the twiner is not distant and/or is not a Palaic does not hold if the fact that it does import hold.; sent24 -> int4: the fact that the twiner imports is not wrong if it is a placebo.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the twiner refrigerates Rachmaninoff. ; $context$ = sent1: the twiner either is a patient or is distant or both. sent2: the cefadroxil is not a Palaic. sent3: the twiner is a Palaic if that it does refrigerate Rachmaninoff is not false. sent4: that the lark refrigerates Rachmaninoff is not incorrect if the twiner does arrange. sent5: the cefadroxil subtilizes. sent6: the twiner is distant if the lark arranges. sent7: if the lark does not arrange the twiner is a patient and/or it is distant. sent8: the cefadroxil does arrange. sent9: either the lark is distant or it does arrange or both if the twiner is not a Palaic. sent10: the cefadroxil is distant if the lark arranges. sent11: the twiner arranges if the lark does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent12: the cefadroxil does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent13: if the lark is patient then it is a Palaic. sent14: that the lark is a catastrophe is right. sent15: the pantile is a Palaic. sent16: if the lark does not arrange either the twiner does refrigerate Rachmaninoff or it is a Palaic or both. sent17: if the lark is patient then the twiner is distant. sent18: if the fact that the twiner is a kind of a hagberry but it is not Piagetian is not correct it is a placebo. sent19: the lark is distant and/or is a patient. sent20: the twiner is a kind of a patient if the lark does refrigerate Rachmaninoff. sent21: the cefadroxil is a Palaic if it is a patient. sent22: if the cefadroxil is not a Palaic the lark either arranges or is a patient or both. sent23: that either something is not distant or it is not a Palaic or both is false if it is an import. sent24: if something is a placebo it is an import. ; $proof$ = | sent22 & sent2 -> int1: the lark does arrange or it is a kind of a patient or both.; int1 & sent6 & sent17 -> int2: the twiner is distant.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the diaphoretic is not a Lome. | ¬{E}{a} | sent1: if the fact that something is belemnitic is true then that it is not occupational and it does refrigerate lepidopteron is wrong. sent2: there is something such that that it is occupational is right. sent3: that the grenadine does not bawl or does not cruise or both does not hold if the molter is a Raleigh. sent4: the molter is a Raleigh. sent5: something is purposeful if it does not refrigerate lepidopteron. sent6: if the fact that something is purposeful hold then it is a Lome. sent7: if the saltbush does not gurgle Mesozoic then it is belemnitic and it is purposeful. sent8: the fact that the diaphoretic refrigerates lepidopteron and is not belemnitic is incorrect if there is something such that it is occupational. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something refrigerates lepidopteron but it is non-belemnitic is not false is not right it is purposeful. sent10: the diaphoretic is purposeful if it does not refrigerate lepidopteron. | sent1: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: {I}{d} -> ¬(¬{G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) sent4: {I}{d} sent5: (x): ¬{B}x -> {D}x sent6: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent7: ¬{F}{b} -> ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent10: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent8 -> int1: that the diaphoretic does refrigerate lepidopteron but it is not belemnitic is not correct.; sent9 -> int2: the diaphoretic is purposeful if the fact that it refrigerates lepidopteron and is non-belemnitic does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diaphoretic is purposeful.; sent6 -> int4: the diaphoretic is a kind of a Lome if it is purposeful.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent8 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent9 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {D}{a}; sent6 -> int4: {D}{a} -> {E}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the diaphoretic is not a kind of a Lome. | ¬{E}{a} | [
"sent1 -> int5: if the saltbush is belemnitic then that it is a kind of non-occupational thing that refrigerates lepidopteron does not hold.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the grenadine does not bawl and/or it is not a cruise is false.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it either does not bawl or is not a cruise or both is false.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diaphoretic is not a Lome. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is belemnitic is true then that it is not occupational and it does refrigerate lepidopteron is wrong. sent2: there is something such that that it is occupational is right. sent3: that the grenadine does not bawl or does not cruise or both does not hold if the molter is a Raleigh. sent4: the molter is a Raleigh. sent5: something is purposeful if it does not refrigerate lepidopteron. sent6: if the fact that something is purposeful hold then it is a Lome. sent7: if the saltbush does not gurgle Mesozoic then it is belemnitic and it is purposeful. sent8: the fact that the diaphoretic refrigerates lepidopteron and is not belemnitic is incorrect if there is something such that it is occupational. sent9: if the fact that the fact that something refrigerates lepidopteron but it is non-belemnitic is not false is not right it is purposeful. sent10: the diaphoretic is purposeful if it does not refrigerate lepidopteron. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent8 -> int1: that the diaphoretic does refrigerate lepidopteron but it is not belemnitic is not correct.; sent9 -> int2: the diaphoretic is purposeful if the fact that it refrigerates lepidopteron and is non-belemnitic does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diaphoretic is purposeful.; sent6 -> int4: the diaphoretic is a kind of a Lome if it is purposeful.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the BR is not asynchronous. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: if that the coalman does not strive yellowtail but it is actable is right then it is abasic. sent2: the fact that the halophyte is not asynchronous is correct if there is something such that the fact that it strives powwow and it does gurgle Wisconsinite is false. sent3: the fact that the halophyte is asynchronous and it does gurgle Wisconsinite is false. sent4: that something does not mantle diner and it does not refrigerate ribaldry is not false if it is abasic. sent5: the BR is not asynchronous if something does not strive powwow. sent6: if that the viscountess is asynchronous hold then the BR is asynchronous. sent7: if the coalman is not lidless but crosswise the fraxinella does strive hook. sent8: if that the limnologist is not a stomach and it does not strive hook is not right then the viscountess is not a zombie. sent9: a non-chancrous thing does not strive yellowtail and is actable. sent10: if something strives hook then the fact that the limnologist does not stomach and does not strives hook is false. sent11: that the BR is a Cetoniidae and does gurgle Wisconsinite is not true. sent12: if that the backpack does not refrigerate fraxinella and is chancrous is incorrect then the coalman is not chancrous. sent13: if there is something such that that it gurgles Wisconsinite and strives powwow is not correct then the BR is not asynchronous. sent14: something is not lidless and is crosswise if it does not mantle diner. sent15: that the backpack does not refrigerate fraxinella but it is chancrous is not true. sent16: there exists something such that it gurgles Wisconsinite and it does strive powwow. sent17: that the fact that the halophyte does gurgle Wisconsinite and strives powwow is incorrect is true. | sent1: (¬{J}{e} & {K}{e}) -> {I}{e} sent2: (x): ¬({AB}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: ¬({A}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent4: (x): {I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) sent5: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} sent7: (¬{E}{e} & {F}{e}) -> {C}{d} sent8: ¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: (x): ¬{L}x -> (¬{J}x & {K}x) sent10: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent11: ¬({FG}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent12: ¬(¬{M}{f} & {L}{f}) -> ¬{L}{e} sent13: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) sent15: ¬(¬{M}{f} & {L}{f}) sent16: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent17: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does gurgle Wisconsinite and does strive powwow is not correct.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent17 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the BR is asynchronous. | {A}{a} | []
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the BR is not asynchronous. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the coalman does not strive yellowtail but it is actable is right then it is abasic. sent2: the fact that the halophyte is not asynchronous is correct if there is something such that the fact that it strives powwow and it does gurgle Wisconsinite is false. sent3: the fact that the halophyte is asynchronous and it does gurgle Wisconsinite is false. sent4: that something does not mantle diner and it does not refrigerate ribaldry is not false if it is abasic. sent5: the BR is not asynchronous if something does not strive powwow. sent6: if that the viscountess is asynchronous hold then the BR is asynchronous. sent7: if the coalman is not lidless but crosswise the fraxinella does strive hook. sent8: if that the limnologist is not a stomach and it does not strive hook is not right then the viscountess is not a zombie. sent9: a non-chancrous thing does not strive yellowtail and is actable. sent10: if something strives hook then the fact that the limnologist does not stomach and does not strives hook is false. sent11: that the BR is a Cetoniidae and does gurgle Wisconsinite is not true. sent12: if that the backpack does not refrigerate fraxinella and is chancrous is incorrect then the coalman is not chancrous. sent13: if there is something such that that it gurgles Wisconsinite and strives powwow is not correct then the BR is not asynchronous. sent14: something is not lidless and is crosswise if it does not mantle diner. sent15: that the backpack does not refrigerate fraxinella but it is chancrous is not true. sent16: there exists something such that it gurgles Wisconsinite and it does strive powwow. sent17: that the fact that the halophyte does gurgle Wisconsinite and strives powwow is incorrect is true. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does gurgle Wisconsinite and does strive powwow is not correct.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the charge happens and the streptococcalness happens. | ({C} & {D}) | sent1: the fact that the reluctance occurs hold if the mantling peneplain does not occur. sent2: the refrigerating mastiff but not the reluctance occurs if the clockwiseness happens. sent3: if the curtainlessness happens then the charge occurs. sent4: the mantling lamp occurs and/or the curtainlessness occurs if the fact that the charging does not occur hold. sent5: the mantling lamp occurs. sent6: the charge does not occur if the refrigerating mastiff occurs and the reluctance occurs. sent7: both the mantling lamp and the curtainlessness happens. sent8: if the mantling lamp does not occur then that both the charge and the streptococcalness happens is incorrect. sent9: if the refrigerating mastiff occurs and the reluctance does not occur the streptococcalness happens. sent10: the clockwiseness happens. | sent1: ¬{H} -> {E} sent2: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) sent3: {B} -> {C} sent4: ¬{C} -> ({A} v {B}) sent5: {A} sent6: ({F} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent7: ({A} & {B}) sent8: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent9: ({F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} sent10: {G} | [
"sent7 -> int1: the curtainlessness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the charging happens.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the refrigerating mastiff happens but the reluctance does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the streptococcalness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: {C}; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: ({F} & ¬{E}); sent9 & int3 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| both the lysogenicness and the adhesion happens. | ({IS} & {EA}) | []
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the charge happens and the streptococcalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the reluctance occurs hold if the mantling peneplain does not occur. sent2: the refrigerating mastiff but not the reluctance occurs if the clockwiseness happens. sent3: if the curtainlessness happens then the charge occurs. sent4: the mantling lamp occurs and/or the curtainlessness occurs if the fact that the charging does not occur hold. sent5: the mantling lamp occurs. sent6: the charge does not occur if the refrigerating mastiff occurs and the reluctance occurs. sent7: both the mantling lamp and the curtainlessness happens. sent8: if the mantling lamp does not occur then that both the charge and the streptococcalness happens is incorrect. sent9: if the refrigerating mastiff occurs and the reluctance does not occur the streptococcalness happens. sent10: the clockwiseness happens. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: the curtainlessness occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the charging happens.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the refrigerating mastiff happens but the reluctance does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the streptococcalness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the zodiac is an official. | {D}{a} | sent1: that the Hebraist is not a Weser but it does refrigerate arcella is incorrect. sent2: if something is not a capillarity the fact that it does manacle and it is official is not right. sent3: either the timer is not Socratic or it is not a ballade or both. sent4: the zodiac is a kind of a capillarity if it manacles. sent5: if the fact that the Yahi manacles and it is an official is incorrect the zodiac is not official. sent6: something is not a kind of a capillarity if it is postbiblical and a Weser. sent7: the Yahi is postbiblical if there is something such that it either is a neoconservatism or is postbiblical or both. sent8: the lambkill is a neoconservatism if the timer is not a ballade. sent9: if the timer is either not Socratic or not a ballade or both then it is not a kind of a ballade. sent10: something is a kind of an official if it is postbiblical. sent11: the zodiac manacles. sent12: something is postbiblical if it is a kind of a capillarity. | sent1: ¬(¬{E}{d} & {H}{d}) sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {D}x) sent3: (¬{J}{e} v ¬{F}{e}) sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent5: ¬({A}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent6: (x): ({C}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: (x): ({G}x v {C}x) -> {C}{b} sent8: ¬{F}{e} -> {G}{c} sent9: (¬{J}{e} v ¬{F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{e} sent10: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent11: {A}{a} sent12: (x): {B}x -> {C}x | [
"sent4 & sent11 -> int1: the zodiac is a capillarity.; sent12 -> int2: the zodiac is postbiblical if it is a kind of a capillarity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zodiac is postbiblical.; sent10 -> int4: the zodiac is an official if it is postbiblical.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent11 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent12 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a}; sent10 -> int4: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the zodiac is unofficial. | ¬{D}{a} | [
"sent2 -> int5: if the Yahi is not a kind of a capillarity then the fact that it does manacle and is a kind of an official is wrong.; sent6 -> int6: if the Yahi is both postbiblical and a Weser then it is not a kind of a capillarity.; sent9 & sent3 -> int7: the timer is not a kind of a ballade.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the lambkill is a neoconservatism.; int8 -> int9: the lambkill is a neoconservatism and/or is postbiblical.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is either a neoconservatism or postbiblical or both.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the Yahi is postbiblical.; sent1 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is not a Weser and it refrigerates arcella is not true.;"
]
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the zodiac is an official. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Hebraist is not a Weser but it does refrigerate arcella is incorrect. sent2: if something is not a capillarity the fact that it does manacle and it is official is not right. sent3: either the timer is not Socratic or it is not a ballade or both. sent4: the zodiac is a kind of a capillarity if it manacles. sent5: if the fact that the Yahi manacles and it is an official is incorrect the zodiac is not official. sent6: something is not a kind of a capillarity if it is postbiblical and a Weser. sent7: the Yahi is postbiblical if there is something such that it either is a neoconservatism or is postbiblical or both. sent8: the lambkill is a neoconservatism if the timer is not a ballade. sent9: if the timer is either not Socratic or not a ballade or both then it is not a kind of a ballade. sent10: something is a kind of an official if it is postbiblical. sent11: the zodiac manacles. sent12: something is postbiblical if it is a kind of a capillarity. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent11 -> int1: the zodiac is a capillarity.; sent12 -> int2: the zodiac is postbiblical if it is a kind of a capillarity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the zodiac is postbiblical.; sent10 -> int4: the zodiac is an official if it is postbiblical.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Defense is not a jam. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: if the adrenergic jams then it does not confine. sent2: the Defense is not a jam if either the bioluminescence does confine or it is a defensive or both. | sent1: {D}{bh} -> ¬{C}{bh} sent2: ({C}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} | []
| []
| the adrenergic refrigerates albedo and/or is a down. | ({BU}{bh} v {B}{bh}) | []
| 5 | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Defense is not a jam. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adrenergic jams then it does not confine. sent2: the Defense is not a jam if either the bioluminescence does confine or it is a defensive or both. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Nigerien does not gurgle plastron or is a carburetor or both. | (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | sent1: the Nigerien is a skybox that is ruminant. sent2: the plesiosaur does mantle squab. sent3: the ware does gurgle tracing. sent4: something is not a carburetor if it is a kind of a ruminant. sent5: if something is scapulohumeral it is a ruminant. sent6: if something does mantle squab it does decorate. sent7: if the stinker is a carburetor or not a skybox or both the plastron is a carburetor. sent8: the plastron is scapulohumeral if it does strive powwow. sent9: that the softy is not scapulohumeral and does not strive powwow is not true if the narco-state is not a kind of a deskman. sent10: if there is something such that that it is a ruthenium and is not a Jamaican is not true then the plesiosaur is a dye. sent11: that the CBR either is not etiological or is postpositive or both is wrong. sent12: that something does not quieten and/or does refrigerate gravimeter is false if it is regimental. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a ruthenium and it is not a Jamaican is wrong. sent14: if there is something such that it is a skybox and is a ruminant then the bulimic does gurgle plastron. sent15: if the fact that the softy is not scapulohumeral and it does not strive powwow is false the shiitake is not a kind of a ruminant. sent16: if the plesiosaur decorates and it dyes the ware does not decorates. sent17: the Nigerien is not a kind of a carburetor. sent18: the fact that something does not gurgle plastron and/or it is a kind of a carburetor is not right if it is a kind of a ruminant. sent19: if something does not decorate and does gurgle tracing then the narco-state is not a kind of a deskman. sent20: the Nigerien is not a kind of a carburetor if that it is ruminant is not false. sent21: the Nigerien is a kind of a skybox. sent22: the plastron strives powwow. | sent1: ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent2: {K}{g} sent3: {G}{f} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent5: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent6: (x): {K}x -> {F}x sent7: ({AB}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) -> {AB}{a} sent8: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} sent9: ¬{E}{e} -> ¬(¬{C}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) sent10: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{J}x) -> {I}{g} sent11: ¬(¬{FL}{gn} v {HC}{gn}) sent12: (x): {BA}x -> ¬(¬{BL}x v {CE}x) sent13: (Ex): ¬({H}x & ¬{J}x) sent14: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> {AA}{hs} sent15: ¬(¬{C}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent16: ({F}{g} & {I}{g}) -> ¬{F}{f} sent17: ¬{AB}{aa} sent18: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent19: (x): (¬{F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}{e} sent20: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent21: {B}{aa} sent22: {D}{a} | [
"sent18 -> int1: the fact that the Nigerien does not gurgle plastron and/or it is a kind of a carburetor does not hold if it is a ruminant.; sent1 -> int2: that the Nigerien is ruminant hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent18 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent1 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the bulimic gurgles plastron. | {AA}{hs} | [
"sent5 -> int3: if the plastron is scapulohumeral then it is a ruminant.; sent22 & sent8 -> int4: the plastron is scapulohumeral.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the plastron is a ruminant.;"
]
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Nigerien does not gurgle plastron or is a carburetor or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nigerien is a skybox that is ruminant. sent2: the plesiosaur does mantle squab. sent3: the ware does gurgle tracing. sent4: something is not a carburetor if it is a kind of a ruminant. sent5: if something is scapulohumeral it is a ruminant. sent6: if something does mantle squab it does decorate. sent7: if the stinker is a carburetor or not a skybox or both the plastron is a carburetor. sent8: the plastron is scapulohumeral if it does strive powwow. sent9: that the softy is not scapulohumeral and does not strive powwow is not true if the narco-state is not a kind of a deskman. sent10: if there is something such that that it is a ruthenium and is not a Jamaican is not true then the plesiosaur is a dye. sent11: that the CBR either is not etiological or is postpositive or both is wrong. sent12: that something does not quieten and/or does refrigerate gravimeter is false if it is regimental. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a ruthenium and it is not a Jamaican is wrong. sent14: if there is something such that it is a skybox and is a ruminant then the bulimic does gurgle plastron. sent15: if the fact that the softy is not scapulohumeral and it does not strive powwow is false the shiitake is not a kind of a ruminant. sent16: if the plesiosaur decorates and it dyes the ware does not decorates. sent17: the Nigerien is not a kind of a carburetor. sent18: the fact that something does not gurgle plastron and/or it is a kind of a carburetor is not right if it is a kind of a ruminant. sent19: if something does not decorate and does gurgle tracing then the narco-state is not a kind of a deskman. sent20: the Nigerien is not a kind of a carburetor if that it is ruminant is not false. sent21: the Nigerien is a kind of a skybox. sent22: the plastron strives powwow. ; $proof$ = | sent18 -> int1: the fact that the Nigerien does not gurgle plastron and/or it is a kind of a carburetor does not hold if it is a ruminant.; sent1 -> int2: that the Nigerien is ruminant hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the domain is not a foldout. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: the scenario is not a rearguard. sent2: the domain is polite if the action is a kind of a tagliatelle. sent3: the action is a tagliatelle or it is exaugural or both. sent4: the scenario does constrict or is Anguillan or both if it is not a rearguard. sent5: if something is not impolite then it is a kind of a foldout. sent6: if the action is exaugural the domain is polite. sent7: something either is a kind of a tagliatelle or is not exaugural or both if it is not polite. | sent1: ¬{H}{b} sent2: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} sent3: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) sent4: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{b} v {F}{b}) sent5: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent6: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} sent7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x v ¬{B}x) | [
"sent3 & sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the domain is polite.; sent5 -> int2: the domain is a kind of a foldout if it is polite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent2 & sent6 -> int1: {C}{c}; sent5 -> int2: {C}{c} -> {D}{c}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the domain is not a foldout. | ¬{D}{c} | [
"sent7 -> int3: the action is a tagliatelle and/or it is not exaugural if it is not polite.; sent4 & sent1 -> int4: the scenario constricts or it is a Anguillan or both.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the domain is not a foldout. ; $context$ = sent1: the scenario is not a rearguard. sent2: the domain is polite if the action is a kind of a tagliatelle. sent3: the action is a tagliatelle or it is exaugural or both. sent4: the scenario does constrict or is Anguillan or both if it is not a rearguard. sent5: if something is not impolite then it is a kind of a foldout. sent6: if the action is exaugural the domain is polite. sent7: something either is a kind of a tagliatelle or is not exaugural or both if it is not polite. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the domain is polite.; sent5 -> int2: the domain is a kind of a foldout if it is polite.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if it does refrigerate Tory then it is not a kind of a hiddenness and/or is not a tallith is false. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: if something is leptorrhine it is not Andalusian or is not cytolytic or both. sent2: something is not a Amaethon or is not porcine or both if it is a kind of a tallith. sent3: if that the myrrh is Lincolnesque is not false it is not a kind of a Corinthian and/or does not mantle friar's-cowl. sent4: there exists something such that if it is anonymous then it is not a kind of a grail or does not mantle langouste or both. sent5: if the mollusk refrigerates Tory either it does not mantle myrrh or it is non-sophistic or both. sent6: there is something such that if it is perceptible then it is not a mistflower or it is not anoxic or both. sent7: if the mollusk refrigerates Tory it is not a hiddenness and/or it is a tallith. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a scatter then it is not a whaleboat or it does not refrigerate gate or both. sent9: there is something such that if it is a proposition then it is not cytolytic and/or it is not a Dytiscidae. sent10: the mollusk is not a kind of a tallith and/or it is not a sou if it gurgles Symphytum. sent11: if the mollusk does refrigerate Tory then it is a hiddenness or it is not a tallith or both. sent12: something either is not a hiddenness or does not mantle roost or both if it wails. sent13: if the mollusk is a hiddenness then it does not gurgle misery and/or does not palatalize. sent14: there exists something such that if it refrigerates Tory it either is not a hiddenness or is a tallith or both. sent15: there is something such that if it is sophistic it either is immeasurable or is not a heralded or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a Amaethon then either it does not gurgle Weizenbock or it is not anoxic or both. sent17: the mollusk is not a Dionysius and/or it is not a November if it refrigerates Tory. sent18: if the fact that the mollusk does refrigerate Tory hold then either it is not a hiddenness or it is not a tallith or both. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a proposition then it is not a reentry and/or it is not a campaign. sent20: there is something such that if it refrigerates Tory then either it is a hiddenness or it is not a kind of a tallith or both. sent21: if the heir-at-law is a Tyrolean then either it is not a hiddenness or it does not refrigerate alumroot or both. | sent1: (x): {IB}x -> (¬{IU}x v ¬{IS}x) sent2: (x): {AB}x -> (¬{HM}x v ¬{GO}x) sent3: {EP}{hk} -> (¬{HF}{hk} v ¬{IP}{hk}) sent4: (Ex): {CO}x -> (¬{AM}x v ¬{BI}x) sent5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{C}{aa} v ¬{JG}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): {FB}x -> (¬{DN}x v ¬{BL}x) sent7: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent8: (Ex): {FH}x -> (¬{BT}x v ¬{DB}x) sent9: (Ex): {T}x -> (¬{IS}x v ¬{HC}x) sent10: {IC}{aa} -> (¬{AB}{aa} v ¬{IN}{aa}) sent11: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent12: (x): {IT}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AQ}x) sent13: {AA}{aa} -> (¬{FS}{aa} v ¬{IR}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent15: (Ex): {JG}x -> ({CT}x v ¬{BN}x) sent16: (Ex): {HM}x -> (¬{N}x v ¬{BL}x) sent17: {A}{aa} -> (¬{DF}{aa} v ¬{EO}{aa}) sent18: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent19: (Ex): {T}x -> (¬{DR}x v ¬{HP}x) sent20: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent21: {CH}{j} -> (¬{AA}{j} v ¬{FN}{j}) | [
"sent18 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent18 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the swimmer is not a kind of a Amaethon and/or it is not porcine if it is a tallith. | {AB}{hp} -> (¬{HM}{hp} v ¬{GO}{hp}) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does refrigerate Tory then it is not a kind of a hiddenness and/or is not a tallith is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is leptorrhine it is not Andalusian or is not cytolytic or both. sent2: something is not a Amaethon or is not porcine or both if it is a kind of a tallith. sent3: if that the myrrh is Lincolnesque is not false it is not a kind of a Corinthian and/or does not mantle friar's-cowl. sent4: there exists something such that if it is anonymous then it is not a kind of a grail or does not mantle langouste or both. sent5: if the mollusk refrigerates Tory either it does not mantle myrrh or it is non-sophistic or both. sent6: there is something such that if it is perceptible then it is not a mistflower or it is not anoxic or both. sent7: if the mollusk refrigerates Tory it is not a hiddenness and/or it is a tallith. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a scatter then it is not a whaleboat or it does not refrigerate gate or both. sent9: there is something such that if it is a proposition then it is not cytolytic and/or it is not a Dytiscidae. sent10: the mollusk is not a kind of a tallith and/or it is not a sou if it gurgles Symphytum. sent11: if the mollusk does refrigerate Tory then it is a hiddenness or it is not a tallith or both. sent12: something either is not a hiddenness or does not mantle roost or both if it wails. sent13: if the mollusk is a hiddenness then it does not gurgle misery and/or does not palatalize. sent14: there exists something such that if it refrigerates Tory it either is not a hiddenness or is a tallith or both. sent15: there is something such that if it is sophistic it either is immeasurable or is not a heralded or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a Amaethon then either it does not gurgle Weizenbock or it is not anoxic or both. sent17: the mollusk is not a Dionysius and/or it is not a November if it refrigerates Tory. sent18: if the fact that the mollusk does refrigerate Tory hold then either it is not a hiddenness or it is not a tallith or both. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of a proposition then it is not a reentry and/or it is not a campaign. sent20: there is something such that if it refrigerates Tory then either it is a hiddenness or it is not a kind of a tallith or both. sent21: if the heir-at-law is a Tyrolean then either it is not a hiddenness or it does not refrigerate alumroot or both. ; $proof$ = | sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the blaster is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor. | (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | sent1: if the blaster is obstetric that it is not a cuddle is correct. sent2: if the leadwort refrigerates Athenian that the blaster is not a kind of a pharmacologist and/or it is a quaestor does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the re is not anatomic and does not refrigerate Athenian does not hold is not wrong if it does not refrigerate meticulousness. sent4: something refrigerates meticulousness if that it is not an ellipse but obstetric does not hold. sent5: the sculpin is a tinker. sent6: the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian if it is anatomic. sent7: if the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian then it is a kind of a pharmacologist or is a quaestor or both. sent8: if the fact that the conessi is not unmindful is correct then the re mantles sirloin and is a kind of a stowage. sent9: if something does not refrigerate Athenian then it is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a quaestor. sent10: the blaster is anatomic. sent11: if something does refrigerate meticulousness the fact that it does not refrigerate Athenian and is anatomic is not correct. sent12: if something does not refrigerate Athenian then it is a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor. sent13: that the conessi is not unmindful hold if the sculpin is unmindful. sent14: the blaster is a pharmacologist and/or is a quaestor. sent15: if the sculpin tinkers it is unmindful. sent16: the luge is not a pharmacologist and/or does refrigerate abeyance. sent17: the fact that something is both not an ellipse and obstetric is not true if it is a stowage. | sent1: {E}{aa} -> ¬{IH}{aa} sent2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {C}x sent5: {I}{d} sent6: {B}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent7: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent8: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent10: {B}{aa} sent11: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent13: {H}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} sent14: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent15: {I}{d} -> {H}{d} sent16: (¬{AA}{gm} v {EB}{gm}) sent17: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the blaster is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor if it does not refrigerate Athenian.; sent6 & sent10 -> int2: the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent6 & sent10 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the harvestfish is not a kind of an ellipse and/or it is Congregational. | (¬{D}{ep} v {HI}{ep}) | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the blaster is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blaster is obstetric that it is not a cuddle is correct. sent2: if the leadwort refrigerates Athenian that the blaster is not a kind of a pharmacologist and/or it is a quaestor does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the re is not anatomic and does not refrigerate Athenian does not hold is not wrong if it does not refrigerate meticulousness. sent4: something refrigerates meticulousness if that it is not an ellipse but obstetric does not hold. sent5: the sculpin is a tinker. sent6: the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian if it is anatomic. sent7: if the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian then it is a kind of a pharmacologist or is a quaestor or both. sent8: if the fact that the conessi is not unmindful is correct then the re mantles sirloin and is a kind of a stowage. sent9: if something does not refrigerate Athenian then it is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a quaestor. sent10: the blaster is anatomic. sent11: if something does refrigerate meticulousness the fact that it does not refrigerate Athenian and is anatomic is not correct. sent12: if something does not refrigerate Athenian then it is a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor. sent13: that the conessi is not unmindful hold if the sculpin is unmindful. sent14: the blaster is a pharmacologist and/or is a quaestor. sent15: if the sculpin tinkers it is unmindful. sent16: the luge is not a pharmacologist and/or does refrigerate abeyance. sent17: the fact that something is both not an ellipse and obstetric is not true if it is a stowage. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: the blaster is not a pharmacologist and/or it is a kind of a quaestor if it does not refrigerate Athenian.; sent6 & sent10 -> int2: the blaster does not refrigerate Athenian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that either the angler is a kind of a quartervine or it is a treponema or both is incorrect. | ¬({D}{b} v {C}{b}) | sent1: that the center is a quartervine that is a profit is incorrect. sent2: if something is not a quartervine it is intrusive. sent3: the angler is a kind of a treponema if the center is a kind of a Micropterus. sent4: the smoothbore is not a quartervine if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a quartervine and it does profit is incorrect. sent5: the center is not a lemongrass. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Micropterus and it fans is incorrect the angler does not fans. sent7: that if the center is not the fan the center is a Micropterus hold. sent8: if the angler is a fan the center is a treponema. sent9: the center does not fan. | sent1: ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FA}x sent3: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent4: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}{dk} sent5: ¬{EL}{a} sent6: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}{b} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the center is a kind of a Micropterus.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the angler is a kind of a treponema.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent3 & int1 -> int2: {C}{b}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the angler is a quartervine and/or a treponema does not hold. | ¬({D}{b} v {C}{b}) | []
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that either the angler is a kind of a quartervine or it is a treponema or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the center is a quartervine that is a profit is incorrect. sent2: if something is not a quartervine it is intrusive. sent3: the angler is a kind of a treponema if the center is a kind of a Micropterus. sent4: the smoothbore is not a quartervine if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a quartervine and it does profit is incorrect. sent5: the center is not a lemongrass. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Micropterus and it fans is incorrect the angler does not fans. sent7: that if the center is not the fan the center is a Micropterus hold. sent8: if the angler is a fan the center is a treponema. sent9: the center does not fan. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the center is a kind of a Micropterus.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the angler is a kind of a treponema.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is actuarial then it is propulsive is wrong. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> {C}x) | sent1: the jag is a archaism if it is a VA. sent2: if the fact that the jag does roost is not wrong it is a badminton. sent3: there is something such that if it is a screwup it is osmotic. sent4: something is a Atherinidae if it is ideological. sent5: the deadhead is actuarial if it gurgles saltbush. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unavailable it is a cascade. sent7: if the jag is actuarial then it gurgles transgressor. sent8: there is something such that if that it gurgles bombardment is correct then it is a Abadan. sent9: the Socinian is a legate if it is a Mullah. sent10: the jag is a kind of a photometrist if the fact that it is a adsorbent is right. sent11: there is something such that if it is social then it does gurgle bombardment. sent12: the fact that the jag is propulsive is not wrong if it is a primogeniture. sent13: if the jag is actuarial it is propulsive. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that if it refrigerates Sphecidae then it is astigmatic is not wrong. | sent1: {FS}{aa} -> {IO}{aa} sent2: {DM}{aa} -> {HJ}{aa} sent3: (Ex): {AK}x -> {IE}x sent4: (x): {EG}x -> {O}x sent5: {FF}{n} -> {A}{n} sent6: (Ex): {DF}x -> {BE}x sent7: {A}{aa} -> {BU}{aa} sent8: (Ex): {GQ}x -> {FK}x sent9: {AM}{hm} -> {GC}{hm} sent10: {CR}{aa} -> {HF}{aa} sent11: (Ex): {DI}x -> {GQ}x sent12: {AJ}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent13: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent14: (Ex): {BD}x -> {BA}x | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it is ideological it is a Atherinidae. | (Ex): {EG}x -> {O}x | [
"sent4 -> int1: the saltbush is a Atherinidae if it is ideological.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is actuarial then it is propulsive is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the jag is a archaism if it is a VA. sent2: if the fact that the jag does roost is not wrong it is a badminton. sent3: there is something such that if it is a screwup it is osmotic. sent4: something is a Atherinidae if it is ideological. sent5: the deadhead is actuarial if it gurgles saltbush. sent6: there exists something such that if it is unavailable it is a cascade. sent7: if the jag is actuarial then it gurgles transgressor. sent8: there is something such that if that it gurgles bombardment is correct then it is a Abadan. sent9: the Socinian is a legate if it is a Mullah. sent10: the jag is a kind of a photometrist if the fact that it is a adsorbent is right. sent11: there is something such that if it is social then it does gurgle bombardment. sent12: the fact that the jag is propulsive is not wrong if it is a primogeniture. sent13: if the jag is actuarial it is propulsive. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that if it refrigerates Sphecidae then it is astigmatic is not wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the bullfighter does resolve or it does not mantle LGV or both is incorrect. | ¬({A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: that the bullfighter is a kind of a setterwort but it is not a fingerprint is not right. sent2: the fact that the bullfighter does not resolve hold if it does not gurgle Prionotus. sent3: the fact that the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus hold if that it is not a setterwort is not wrong. sent4: the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus if that it is a setterwort that does not fingerprint does not hold. sent5: the private does not gurgle Prionotus. sent6: the bullfighter does not resolve. sent7: the fact that the bullfighter is a Hampton and/or it is not pentavalent is not right. sent8: that the bullfighter is an ultrasound that does not gurgle Heuchera does not hold. sent9: if the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus then that it either does resolve or does not mantle LGV or both is not right. sent10: if that the bayou is a gully but it is not a kind of a setterwort is not true then it is not unquestionable. | sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: ¬{B}{ik} sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: ¬({BC}{a} v ¬{AH}{a}) sent8: ¬({DT}{a} & ¬{CI}{a}) sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent10: ¬({FG}{j} & ¬{AA}{j}) -> ¬{GD}{j} | [
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the bullfighter does resolve or it does not mantle LGV or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bullfighter is a kind of a setterwort but it is not a fingerprint is not right. sent2: the fact that the bullfighter does not resolve hold if it does not gurgle Prionotus. sent3: the fact that the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus hold if that it is not a setterwort is not wrong. sent4: the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus if that it is a setterwort that does not fingerprint does not hold. sent5: the private does not gurgle Prionotus. sent6: the bullfighter does not resolve. sent7: the fact that the bullfighter is a Hampton and/or it is not pentavalent is not right. sent8: that the bullfighter is an ultrasound that does not gurgle Heuchera does not hold. sent9: if the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus then that it either does resolve or does not mantle LGV or both is not right. sent10: if that the bayou is a gully but it is not a kind of a setterwort is not true then it is not unquestionable. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the bullfighter does not gurgle Prionotus.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the show-stopper does not occur. | ¬{E} | sent1: the fact that the terrestrialness occurs hold if the mantling Maine occurs. sent2: that the Kenyan does not occur and the opening occurs prevents the non-domiciliariness. sent3: the Kenyanness does not occur if that the fact that the Kenyanness and the seiche happens is false is not wrong. sent4: that the Kenyanness and the seiche occurs is false. sent5: the show-stopper does not occur if both the terrestrialness and the predominating occurs. sent6: either the entr'acte or the mantling Maine or both happens. sent7: not the mantling Maine but the terrestrialness happens if that the predominating does not occur is true. sent8: that the mantling Maine occurs triggers that the hide-and-seek but not the entr'acte happens. sent9: the domiciliariness happens. sent10: the domiciliariness occurs and the predominating occurs. | sent1: {B} -> {C} sent2: (¬{H} & {G}) -> {F} sent3: ¬({H} & {K}) -> ¬{H} sent4: ¬({H} & {K}) sent5: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{E} sent6: ({A} v {B}) sent7: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent8: {B} -> ({DP} & ¬{A}) sent9: {F} sent10: ({F} & {D}) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the predominating happens.;"
]
| [
"sent10 -> int1: {D};"
]
| the show-stopper happens. | {E} | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> int2: the Kenyanness does not occur.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the show-stopper does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the terrestrialness occurs hold if the mantling Maine occurs. sent2: that the Kenyan does not occur and the opening occurs prevents the non-domiciliariness. sent3: the Kenyanness does not occur if that the fact that the Kenyanness and the seiche happens is false is not wrong. sent4: that the Kenyanness and the seiche occurs is false. sent5: the show-stopper does not occur if both the terrestrialness and the predominating occurs. sent6: either the entr'acte or the mantling Maine or both happens. sent7: not the mantling Maine but the terrestrialness happens if that the predominating does not occur is true. sent8: that the mantling Maine occurs triggers that the hide-and-seek but not the entr'acte happens. sent9: the domiciliariness happens. sent10: the domiciliariness occurs and the predominating occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: the predominating happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the kasha is not a kind of a jackdaw. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: if something irradiates and/or does splinter then that it does not spar hold. sent2: that the greasewood is noncaloric is true. sent3: if the greasewood is either a sortie or resistible or both then it is not a jackdaw. sent4: the kasha is a jackdaw if the fact that the greasewood is not a sortie hold. sent5: something is not a kind of a jackdaw if that it is not non-noncaloric but resistible is not right. sent6: the greasewood is a sortie if the kasha is not resistible. sent7: if something is resistible it is not a sortie. sent8: the fact that if something is a concrete or does refrigerate glasnost or both it is not a pood is correct. sent9: the kasha is noncaloric. sent10: if the greasewood is resistible it is not a sortie. sent11: something is not a kind of a sortie if it is resistible and/or noncaloric. | sent1: (x): ({EL}x v {DS}x) -> ¬{BR}x sent2: {B}{a} sent3: ({C}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: ¬{C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent6: ¬{A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent8: (x): ({HG}x v {GP}x) -> ¬{FT}x sent9: {B}{b} sent10: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} sent11: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the greasewood is resistible or it is noncaloric or both.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the greasewood is not a kind of a sortie hold if it is resistible and/or it is noncaloric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the greasewood is not a sortie.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); sent11 -> int2: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the kasha is not a kind of a jackdaw is correct. | ¬{D}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int4: the kasha is not a jackdaw if the fact that it is noncaloric and it is resistible is not true.;"
]
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the kasha is not a kind of a jackdaw. ; $context$ = sent1: if something irradiates and/or does splinter then that it does not spar hold. sent2: that the greasewood is noncaloric is true. sent3: if the greasewood is either a sortie or resistible or both then it is not a jackdaw. sent4: the kasha is a jackdaw if the fact that the greasewood is not a sortie hold. sent5: something is not a kind of a jackdaw if that it is not non-noncaloric but resistible is not right. sent6: the greasewood is a sortie if the kasha is not resistible. sent7: if something is resistible it is not a sortie. sent8: the fact that if something is a concrete or does refrigerate glasnost or both it is not a pood is correct. sent9: the kasha is noncaloric. sent10: if the greasewood is resistible it is not a sortie. sent11: something is not a kind of a sortie if it is resistible and/or noncaloric. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the greasewood is resistible or it is noncaloric or both.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the greasewood is not a kind of a sortie hold if it is resistible and/or it is noncaloric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the greasewood is not a sortie.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the grating is proactive. | {C}{c} | sent1: if the monocot is a calcitonin the silverwork is creaseproof. sent2: the fact that the prospectus is proactive hold. sent3: if the grating is creaseproof the silverwork is proactive. sent4: that something is creaseproof thing that is not proactive is not right if it is not a calcitonin. sent5: if the silverwork is anicteric then it does not satisfy and is not archesporial. sent6: the fact that the grating is non-proactive is not wrong if that the monocot is creaseproof but it is not non-proactive is not true. sent7: the monocot is not non-creaseproof. sent8: if the silverwork is creaseproof then the grating is proactive. sent9: that the silverwork is proactive is correct. | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: {C}{jj} sent3: {B}{c} -> {C}{b} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent5: {F}{b} -> (¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent6: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent7: {B}{a} sent8: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent9: {C}{b} | []
| []
| the grating is not proactive. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the monocot is not a calcitonin then that it is not non-creaseproof but non-proactive is not right.;"
]
| 7 | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the grating is proactive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the monocot is a calcitonin the silverwork is creaseproof. sent2: the fact that the prospectus is proactive hold. sent3: if the grating is creaseproof the silverwork is proactive. sent4: that something is creaseproof thing that is not proactive is not right if it is not a calcitonin. sent5: if the silverwork is anicteric then it does not satisfy and is not archesporial. sent6: the fact that the grating is non-proactive is not wrong if that the monocot is creaseproof but it is not non-proactive is not true. sent7: the monocot is not non-creaseproof. sent8: if the silverwork is creaseproof then the grating is proactive. sent9: that the silverwork is proactive is correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the timberman is not a Corneille. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: the felucca either is not morbilliform or is not a kind of a cylinder or both. sent2: the fact that if something is not a jewfish then it is a potentiometer that does not refrigerate pteridophyte hold. sent3: there is something such that that it is not nonreversible and it is a leadwort does not hold. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not nonreversible and it is not a leadwort is wrong then the timberman is not a Corneille. sent5: if the felucca is a kind of a potentiometer that does not refrigerate pteridophyte then the Down is not a fez. sent6: there exists something such that it is not nonreversible and it is not a leadwort. sent7: if that something is not a leadwort but it is a Corneille does not hold it is not nonreversible. | sent1: (¬{I}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: ({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent6: (Ex): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Down is a kind of reversible thing that is not a kind of a leadwort.; assump1 -> int1: the Down is not a leadwort.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
]
| the timberman is not nonreversible. | ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int2: the timberman is not nonreversible if the fact that it is not a leadwort but a Corneille is incorrect.; sent2 -> int3: if the felucca is not a kind of a jewfish it is a potentiometer and it does not refrigerate pteridophyte.;"
]
| 7 | 4 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the timberman is not a Corneille. ; $context$ = sent1: the felucca either is not morbilliform or is not a kind of a cylinder or both. sent2: the fact that if something is not a jewfish then it is a potentiometer that does not refrigerate pteridophyte hold. sent3: there is something such that that it is not nonreversible and it is a leadwort does not hold. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not nonreversible and it is not a leadwort is wrong then the timberman is not a Corneille. sent5: if the felucca is a kind of a potentiometer that does not refrigerate pteridophyte then the Down is not a fez. sent6: there exists something such that it is not nonreversible and it is not a leadwort. sent7: if that something is not a leadwort but it is a Corneille does not hold it is not nonreversible. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Down is a kind of reversible thing that is not a kind of a leadwort.; assump1 -> int1: the Down is not a leadwort.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the hip is nontoxic. | {A}{a} | sent1: if the Nigerian is nontoxic the hip is nontoxic. sent2: if something either does not gurgle Nigerian or is a puff or both it is not nontoxic. sent3: the sealskin is not nontoxic. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a lancelet or it does mantle Satyridae or both. sent5: the nova is not a caravanning. sent6: that the hip is not a caravanning and/or is nontoxic is true. sent7: the hip is not nontoxic if something is not a kind of a Algonquian or it is a caravanning or both. sent8: the villus is not nontoxic if something is not a kind of a Algonquian and/or caravans. sent9: there exists something such that it is a Algonquian and/or it does caravan. sent10: something is nontoxic and it is a kind of a puff if that it does not gurgle Nigerian is right. sent11: if that the paintbrush is not part-time or it does not gurgle Nigerian or both is false then the fact that the Nigerian does gurgle Nigerian does not hold. sent12: the hip is not a caravanning. sent13: something is not nontoxic or Algonquian or both. sent14: the villus is not a Algonquian and/or it does caravan. sent15: that the villus is not nontoxic is not incorrect if there exists something such that it either is not a caravanning or is a kind of a Algonquian or both. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Algonquian and/or it is nontoxic. sent17: if the paintbrush is a Ornithischia that it is not part-time or it does not gurgle Nigerian or both is not true. sent18: the hip is not nontoxic if there exists something such that it is not a Algonquian. sent19: the hip is part-time but it is not a Ornithischia if it does not mantle Mazatlan. sent20: if something is not a kind of a Algonquian or it is nontoxic or both the hip is not a kind of a caravanning. sent21: the villus is a Algonquian or caravans or both. | sent1: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} sent2: (x): (¬{C}x v {B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{A}{fj} sent4: (Ex): (¬{DE}x v {HJ}x) sent5: ¬{AB}{o} sent6: (¬{AB}{a} v {A}{a}) sent7: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent9: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent11: ¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent12: ¬{AB}{a} sent13: (Ex): (¬{A}x v {AA}x) sent14: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent15: (x): (¬{AB}x v {AA}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent16: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {A}x) sent17: {E}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent18: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent19: ¬{F}{a} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent20: (x): (¬{AA}x v {A}x) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent21: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent14 -> int1: something is not Algonquian and/or it does caravan.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent14 -> int1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x); int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the trapeze is not nontoxic. | ¬{A}{co} | [
"sent2 -> int2: if the trapeze does not gurgle Nigerian and/or does puff then it is not nontoxic.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the hip is nontoxic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Nigerian is nontoxic the hip is nontoxic. sent2: if something either does not gurgle Nigerian or is a puff or both it is not nontoxic. sent3: the sealskin is not nontoxic. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a lancelet or it does mantle Satyridae or both. sent5: the nova is not a caravanning. sent6: that the hip is not a caravanning and/or is nontoxic is true. sent7: the hip is not nontoxic if something is not a kind of a Algonquian or it is a caravanning or both. sent8: the villus is not nontoxic if something is not a kind of a Algonquian and/or caravans. sent9: there exists something such that it is a Algonquian and/or it does caravan. sent10: something is nontoxic and it is a kind of a puff if that it does not gurgle Nigerian is right. sent11: if that the paintbrush is not part-time or it does not gurgle Nigerian or both is false then the fact that the Nigerian does gurgle Nigerian does not hold. sent12: the hip is not a caravanning. sent13: something is not nontoxic or Algonquian or both. sent14: the villus is not a Algonquian and/or it does caravan. sent15: that the villus is not nontoxic is not incorrect if there exists something such that it either is not a caravanning or is a kind of a Algonquian or both. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Algonquian and/or it is nontoxic. sent17: if the paintbrush is a Ornithischia that it is not part-time or it does not gurgle Nigerian or both is not true. sent18: the hip is not nontoxic if there exists something such that it is not a Algonquian. sent19: the hip is part-time but it is not a Ornithischia if it does not mantle Mazatlan. sent20: if something is not a kind of a Algonquian or it is nontoxic or both the hip is not a kind of a caravanning. sent21: the villus is a Algonquian or caravans or both. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> int1: something is not Algonquian and/or it does caravan.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if that it does not bide and does rationalize is false then it is a tie. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: the teal is gingival if the fact that it does not bide and gurgles organic does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-employable thing that does mantle kowtow is not right then it is a Rehnquist. sent3: the heartland does nosh if the fact that it is not a familiarity and does bide is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if that it does bide and rationalizes is not right the fact that it is a tie hold. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is both not a hypnotherapy and a collectivism is not true it is interior. sent6: the mixed-blood is a primogeniture if that the fact that it does not burden and it bides is true is wrong. sent7: the heartland does tie if it does not bide and rationalizes. sent8: there is something such that if it does not rationalize it does tie. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not a Mahdist and it is a kind of a bagel is false then it is frivolous. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not strive CD and does resile is not right then it is a kind of a grazed. sent11: if that that that the heartland does not brake and is cogitative hold is not true hold it does tie. sent12: there exists something such that if that it does bide is not wrong it ties. sent13: if the fact that the dirndl is not a kind of an aesthetics but it is a vulcanization is not correct then that it does rationalize hold. sent14: if the heartland does not rationalize then it ties. sent15: there is something such that if it does not bide and does rationalize then it is a kind of a tie. sent16: if that something is a kind of non-coreferential thing that is a witness is not true it is a familiarity. sent17: the heartland ties if that it does bide and it does rationalize is not correct. sent18: there exists something such that if that it does not wedge and it is a Adalia does not hold then it is sacrificial. sent19: there is something such that if that it does not gurgle Ojibwa and it is a crumpet is wrong it is frivolous. sent20: if that the heartland does not bide but it rationalizes is false then it is a tie. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{fo} & {BQ}{fo}) -> {BC}{fo} sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{HB}x & {CK}x) -> {FQ}x sent3: ¬(¬{IG}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> {IK}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: (Ex): ¬(¬{M}x & {HA}x) -> {DG}x sent6: ¬(¬{FK}{at} & {AA}{at}) -> {HQ}{at} sent7: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): ¬(¬{FE}x & {BM}x) -> {GE}x sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{IO}x & {ET}x) -> {IE}x sent11: ¬(¬{IL}{aa} & {DD}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent12: (Ex): {AA}x -> {B}x sent13: ¬(¬{AE}{dl} & {AK}{dl}) -> {AB}{dl} sent14: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent15: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent16: (x): ¬(¬{N}x & {BA}x) -> {IG}x sent17: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent18: (Ex): ¬(¬{GQ}x & {BT}x) -> {CO}x sent19: (Ex): ¬(¬{FN}x & {AT}x) -> {GE}x sent20: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent20 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent20 -> hypothesis;"
]
| if the fact that the CD is non-coreferential and a witness is incorrect it is a familiarity. | ¬(¬{N}{cc} & {BA}{cc}) -> {IG}{cc} | [
"sent16 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does not bide and does rationalize is false then it is a tie. ; $context$ = sent1: the teal is gingival if the fact that it does not bide and gurgles organic does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-employable thing that does mantle kowtow is not right then it is a Rehnquist. sent3: the heartland does nosh if the fact that it is not a familiarity and does bide is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if that it does bide and rationalizes is not right the fact that it is a tie hold. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it is both not a hypnotherapy and a collectivism is not true it is interior. sent6: the mixed-blood is a primogeniture if that the fact that it does not burden and it bides is true is wrong. sent7: the heartland does tie if it does not bide and rationalizes. sent8: there is something such that if it does not rationalize it does tie. sent9: there is something such that if that it is not a Mahdist and it is a kind of a bagel is false then it is frivolous. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not strive CD and does resile is not right then it is a kind of a grazed. sent11: if that that that the heartland does not brake and is cogitative hold is not true hold it does tie. sent12: there exists something such that if that it does bide is not wrong it ties. sent13: if the fact that the dirndl is not a kind of an aesthetics but it is a vulcanization is not correct then that it does rationalize hold. sent14: if the heartland does not rationalize then it ties. sent15: there is something such that if it does not bide and does rationalize then it is a kind of a tie. sent16: if that something is a kind of non-coreferential thing that is a witness is not true it is a familiarity. sent17: the heartland ties if that it does bide and it does rationalize is not correct. sent18: there exists something such that if that it does not wedge and it is a Adalia does not hold then it is sacrificial. sent19: there is something such that if that it does not gurgle Ojibwa and it is a crumpet is wrong it is frivolous. sent20: if that the heartland does not bide but it rationalizes is false then it is a tie. ; $proof$ = | sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Karakalpak secures and is not Pauline. | ({C}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) | sent1: that the Karakalpak does mantle piddock is not incorrect. sent2: the gulping mantles piddock and/or it does not reverberate. sent3: if either the gulping does not mantle piddock or it is not illegitimate or both the tick does reverberate. sent4: the fact that the Karakalpak does mantle piddock and does not reverberate is wrong if the tick secures. sent5: the fact that the fact that the Karakalpak is secure thing that is not Pauline is wrong hold if the tick reverberates. sent6: the gulping does not reverberate or is not illegitimate or both. sent7: if the tick reverberates then that the Karakalpak is secure and it is not non-Pauline is wrong. sent8: the gulping either does mantle piddock or is not illegitimate or both. sent9: the gulping does not mantle piddock and/or is non-illegitimate. sent10: that the Karakalpak is secure and it is Pauline is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the Karakalpak is Pauline hold then the fact that the gulping does secure but it does not mantle piddock does not hold. sent12: if something is a Wilkinson and/or it is not a Montrachet the fact that it is not non-nebulous is correct. sent13: if something is nebulous then it is not a booklouse and does reverberate. sent14: the fact that the gulping is not non-illegitimate and not insecure does not hold. sent15: the pinhole is illegitimate and/or does not gurgle pinhole. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Montrachet. | sent1: {AA}{c} sent2: ({AA}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent3: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent4: {C}{b} -> ¬({AA}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent5: {B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) sent6: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent7: {B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & {A}{c}) sent8: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent9: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: ¬({C}{c} & {A}{c}) sent11: {A}{c} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent12: (x): ({G}x v ¬{F}x) -> {E}x sent13: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) sent14: ¬({AB}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: ({AB}{fb} v ¬{HD}{fb}) sent16: (Ex): ¬{F}x | [
"sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the tick reverberates.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Karakalpak does secure but it is not Pauline. | ({C}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) | [
"sent13 -> int2: if the Karakalpak is nebulous that it is not a booklouse and it does reverberate is not false.; sent12 -> int3: if the Karakalpak is a kind of a Wilkinson or is not a Montrachet or both it is nebulous.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Karakalpak secures and is not Pauline. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Karakalpak does mantle piddock is not incorrect. sent2: the gulping mantles piddock and/or it does not reverberate. sent3: if either the gulping does not mantle piddock or it is not illegitimate or both the tick does reverberate. sent4: the fact that the Karakalpak does mantle piddock and does not reverberate is wrong if the tick secures. sent5: the fact that the fact that the Karakalpak is secure thing that is not Pauline is wrong hold if the tick reverberates. sent6: the gulping does not reverberate or is not illegitimate or both. sent7: if the tick reverberates then that the Karakalpak is secure and it is not non-Pauline is wrong. sent8: the gulping either does mantle piddock or is not illegitimate or both. sent9: the gulping does not mantle piddock and/or is non-illegitimate. sent10: that the Karakalpak is secure and it is Pauline is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the Karakalpak is Pauline hold then the fact that the gulping does secure but it does not mantle piddock does not hold. sent12: if something is a Wilkinson and/or it is not a Montrachet the fact that it is not non-nebulous is correct. sent13: if something is nebulous then it is not a booklouse and does reverberate. sent14: the fact that the gulping is not non-illegitimate and not insecure does not hold. sent15: the pinhole is illegitimate and/or does not gurgle pinhole. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Montrachet. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the tick reverberates.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the turbot is not cooling. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the boneset is non-vesical if the fact that the turbot either is not legato or is non-vesical or both is not true. sent2: the boneset is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane. sent3: the plumcot does not mantle profession and it is not a flatfish. sent4: the henbane gurgles halothane. sent5: the perimysium is both not a feeling and not a flatfish. sent6: that if something does gurgle boffin then it is an hour is true. sent7: the fact that the shrimper is both non-cooling and not an hour is not right if something is an hour. sent8: if the turbot is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane the boneset is a cooling. sent9: that the turbot is a cooling is right if the boneset is a flatfish that does not gurgle halothane. sent10: the belly does cool. sent11: if the blowing does not yoke then it is not legato and it is vesical. sent12: the blowing does not yoke. sent13: the boneset is not a flatfish. sent14: if the boneset is not vesical it does gurgle boffin and is a bagel. sent15: the turbot is a kind of a flatfish. sent16: the boneset cools. sent17: if the boneset is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane then the turbot cools. sent18: the implant is both not vesical and not a cooling. sent19: that the turbot is not legato and/or is vesical does not hold if there exists something such that it does not yoke. sent20: something is a kind of an hour but it does not gurgle boffin if it is not a bagel. sent21: if the turbot does not cool and it is not a flatfish the fact that the boneset does gurgle halothane hold. | sent1: ¬(¬{F}{b} v {E}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent2: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: (¬{FH}{s} & ¬{AA}{s}) sent4: {AB}{fl} sent5: (¬{AQ}{fc} & ¬{AA}{fc}) sent6: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{ii} & ¬{A}{ii}) sent8: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent10: {B}{de} sent11: ¬{G}{c} -> (¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) sent12: ¬{G}{c} sent13: ¬{AA}{a} sent14: ¬{E}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) sent15: {AA}{b} sent16: {B}{a} sent17: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent18: (¬{E}{fj} & ¬{B}{fj}) sent19: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{F}{b} v {E}{b}) sent20: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & ¬{C}x) sent21: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> {AB}{a} | [
"sent17 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent17 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the shrimper is a flatfish. | {AA}{ii} | [
"sent6 -> int1: if the boneset gurgles boffin then it is a kind of an hour.; sent12 -> int2: there is something such that it does not yoke.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the fact that the turbot is not legato and/or it is not non-vesical is wrong.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the boneset is not vesical.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the boneset does gurgle boffin and is a kind of a bagel.; int5 -> int6: the boneset does gurgle boffin.; int1 & int6 -> int7: the boneset is an hour.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of an hour.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the fact that that the shrimper does not cool and it is not an hour is not true is not wrong.;"
]
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the turbot is not cooling. ; $context$ = sent1: the boneset is non-vesical if the fact that the turbot either is not legato or is non-vesical or both is not true. sent2: the boneset is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane. sent3: the plumcot does not mantle profession and it is not a flatfish. sent4: the henbane gurgles halothane. sent5: the perimysium is both not a feeling and not a flatfish. sent6: that if something does gurgle boffin then it is an hour is true. sent7: the fact that the shrimper is both non-cooling and not an hour is not right if something is an hour. sent8: if the turbot is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane the boneset is a cooling. sent9: that the turbot is a cooling is right if the boneset is a flatfish that does not gurgle halothane. sent10: the belly does cool. sent11: if the blowing does not yoke then it is not legato and it is vesical. sent12: the blowing does not yoke. sent13: the boneset is not a flatfish. sent14: if the boneset is not vesical it does gurgle boffin and is a bagel. sent15: the turbot is a kind of a flatfish. sent16: the boneset cools. sent17: if the boneset is not a kind of a flatfish and does not gurgle halothane then the turbot cools. sent18: the implant is both not vesical and not a cooling. sent19: that the turbot is not legato and/or is vesical does not hold if there exists something such that it does not yoke. sent20: something is a kind of an hour but it does not gurgle boffin if it is not a bagel. sent21: if the turbot does not cool and it is not a flatfish the fact that the boneset does gurgle halothane hold. ; $proof$ = | sent17 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the narco-state is both a toupeed and not a thermal. | ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: the narco-state is a kind of a toupeed. sent2: something that does not mantle Ojibwa is both a toupeed and not thermal. sent3: the narco-state is a toupeed if it does not mantle Ojibwa. sent4: the jungle is a kind of a thermal. sent5: something is a toupeed if it does not mantle Ojibwa. sent6: if something does mantle Ojibwa then that it is both a toupeed and not a thermal does not hold. sent7: the fact that the narco-state does not mantle Ojibwa hold if it is a nosh. | sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent4: {AB}{ig} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent7: {B}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the narco-state is a kind of a toupeed that is not a thermal if it does not mantle Ojibwa.;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
]
| that the narco-state is a kind of a toupeed that is nonthermal is false. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent6 -> int2: the fact that the narco-state is a toupeed but not thermal does not hold if it does mantle Ojibwa.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the narco-state is both a toupeed and not a thermal. ; $context$ = sent1: the narco-state is a kind of a toupeed. sent2: something that does not mantle Ojibwa is both a toupeed and not thermal. sent3: the narco-state is a toupeed if it does not mantle Ojibwa. sent4: the jungle is a kind of a thermal. sent5: something is a toupeed if it does not mantle Ojibwa. sent6: if something does mantle Ojibwa then that it is both a toupeed and not a thermal does not hold. sent7: the fact that the narco-state does not mantle Ojibwa hold if it is a nosh. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the narco-state is a kind of a toupeed that is not a thermal if it does not mantle Ojibwa.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Dostoevskianness is triggered by that the plusness happens. | {B} -> {A} | sent1: the gurgling Brahmana does not occur if that either the Dostoevskianness or the non-plusness or both occurs hold. sent2: if the gurgling Donatism occurs the Dostoevskianness occurs and/or the plusness does not occur. sent3: if the road does not occur then the gurgling Donatism occurs and the mantling rudder occurs. | sent1: ({A} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{JA} sent2: {C} -> ({A} v ¬{B}) sent3: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Dostoevskianness does not occur.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A};"
]
| the gurgling Brahmana does not occur. | ¬{JA} | []
| 8 | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Dostoevskianness is triggered by that the plusness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the gurgling Brahmana does not occur if that either the Dostoevskianness or the non-plusness or both occurs hold. sent2: if the gurgling Donatism occurs the Dostoevskianness occurs and/or the plusness does not occur. sent3: if the road does not occur then the gurgling Donatism occurs and the mantling rudder occurs. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Dostoevskianness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the kohleria does undervalue. | {B}{b} | sent1: that the retainer is a tie and it heterodynes is incorrect. sent2: if the kohleria heterodynes the retainer does not undervalue. sent3: the fact that something is intolerable and does not undervalue is not true if it is a kind of a lancer. sent4: that that the ortygan does bolt but it does not mantle applewood is not correct is correct. sent5: that the kohleria does not undervalue is not incorrect if the retainer heterodynes. sent6: that the kohleria does undervalue and is a lancer is false if it does not heterodyne. sent7: something is not nonpasserine if it does not refrigerate Gynura. sent8: if that the retainer ties but it is not heterodyne is false then the kohleria does not undervalue. sent9: if something gurgles goldenrod then the retainer is nonpasserine and it does refrigerate Gynura. sent10: something does undervalue if it is a lancer. sent11: if the retainer does undervalue then the kohleria does not heterodyne. sent12: if the kohleria is not a tie then the fact that it does undervalue and is not a kind of a lancer is not true. sent13: that the kohleria is a lancer and does undervalue is wrong. sent14: something does gurgle goldenrod if it mantles coulomb. sent15: the fact that the retainer ties and does not heterodyne does not hold if it is not a lancer. sent16: if something is lymphoid it is a lancer. sent17: something is a kind of a lancer and it is lymphoid if it is not nonpasserine. sent18: the fact that the palliative refrigerates Cameroonian and is a ASALA is not true. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does refrigerate Cameroonian and is a ASALA does not hold then the kohleria mantles coulomb. sent20: the retainer is not a lancer. sent21: if that the retainer is not a lancer hold then the fact that it ties and it is heterodyne does not hold. sent22: if the retainer is nonpasserine then the serjeant-at-law is lymphoid. | sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent2: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({GI}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: ¬({FM}{ai} & ¬{IE}{ai}) sent5: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent6: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x sent8: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent9: (x): {F}x -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent10: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent11: {B}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent12: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent13: ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent14: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent15: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent16: (x): {C}x -> {A}x sent17: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) sent18: ¬({H}{c} & {I}{c}) sent19: (x): ¬({H}x & {I}x) -> {G}{b} sent20: ¬{A}{a} sent21: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent22: {D}{a} -> {C}{ia} | [
"sent15 & sent20 -> int1: that the retainer is a tie but it is not heterodyne does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent15 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the serjeant-at-law is intolerable but it does not undervalue does not hold. | ¬({GI}{ia} & ¬{B}{ia}) | [
"sent3 -> int2: if the serjeant-at-law is a lancer then the fact that it is intolerable and it does not undervalue does not hold.; sent16 -> int3: if the serjeant-at-law is lymphoid it is a kind of a lancer.; sent14 -> int4: the kohleria does gurgle goldenrod if it mantles coulomb.; sent18 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it refrigerates Cameroonian and it is a ASALA is incorrect.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the kohleria does mantle coulomb.; int4 & int6 -> int7: that the kohleria gurgles goldenrod is right.; int7 -> int8: something does gurgle goldenrod.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the retainer is nonpasserine and it does refrigerate Gynura.; int9 -> int10: the retainer is nonpasserine.; sent22 & int10 -> int11: the serjeant-at-law is lymphoid.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the serjeant-at-law is a lancer.; int2 & int12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the kohleria does undervalue. ; $context$ = sent1: that the retainer is a tie and it heterodynes is incorrect. sent2: if the kohleria heterodynes the retainer does not undervalue. sent3: the fact that something is intolerable and does not undervalue is not true if it is a kind of a lancer. sent4: that that the ortygan does bolt but it does not mantle applewood is not correct is correct. sent5: that the kohleria does not undervalue is not incorrect if the retainer heterodynes. sent6: that the kohleria does undervalue and is a lancer is false if it does not heterodyne. sent7: something is not nonpasserine if it does not refrigerate Gynura. sent8: if that the retainer ties but it is not heterodyne is false then the kohleria does not undervalue. sent9: if something gurgles goldenrod then the retainer is nonpasserine and it does refrigerate Gynura. sent10: something does undervalue if it is a lancer. sent11: if the retainer does undervalue then the kohleria does not heterodyne. sent12: if the kohleria is not a tie then the fact that it does undervalue and is not a kind of a lancer is not true. sent13: that the kohleria is a lancer and does undervalue is wrong. sent14: something does gurgle goldenrod if it mantles coulomb. sent15: the fact that the retainer ties and does not heterodyne does not hold if it is not a lancer. sent16: if something is lymphoid it is a lancer. sent17: something is a kind of a lancer and it is lymphoid if it is not nonpasserine. sent18: the fact that the palliative refrigerates Cameroonian and is a ASALA is not true. sent19: if there exists something such that the fact that it does refrigerate Cameroonian and is a ASALA does not hold then the kohleria mantles coulomb. sent20: the retainer is not a lancer. sent21: if that the retainer is not a lancer hold then the fact that it ties and it is heterodyne does not hold. sent22: if the retainer is nonpasserine then the serjeant-at-law is lymphoid. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent20 -> int1: that the retainer is a tie but it is not heterodyne does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the bellows but not the sidestep occurs. | ({A} & ¬{C}) | sent1: if the tramming does not occur and the punch-up occurs the redetermination does not occur. sent2: that the bellowing happens and the sidestep occurs is wrong if the nativistness does not occur. sent3: the non-thoughtfulness and the non-paranasalness occurs. sent4: if the amethystineness does not occur then the bellowing occurs and the nativistness happens. sent5: the gurgling Oxford does not occur. sent6: that the hassle does not occur leads to that the non-amethystineness and the bronchospasm occurs. sent7: the fact that both the bellows and the sidestep happens is not correct. sent8: the nativistness does not occur if the non-thoughtfulness and the non-paranasalness occurs. sent9: if both the non-thoughtfulness and the paranasalness happens then the nativistness does not occur. sent10: the paranasalness does not occur. sent11: that the anagrammaticness occurs and the demobilization occurs does not hold. sent12: if the nativistness does not occur that the bellowing but not the sidestep occurs is wrong. | sent1: (¬{BT} & {DH}) -> ¬{EJ} sent2: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) sent3: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {B}) sent5: ¬{BD} sent6: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent7: ¬({A} & {C}) sent8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent9: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent10: ¬{AB} sent11: ¬({DM} & {HT}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) | [
"sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the nativist does not occur.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the bellows happens but the sidestep does not occur. | ({A} & ¬{C}) | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bellows but not the sidestep occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tramming does not occur and the punch-up occurs the redetermination does not occur. sent2: that the bellowing happens and the sidestep occurs is wrong if the nativistness does not occur. sent3: the non-thoughtfulness and the non-paranasalness occurs. sent4: if the amethystineness does not occur then the bellowing occurs and the nativistness happens. sent5: the gurgling Oxford does not occur. sent6: that the hassle does not occur leads to that the non-amethystineness and the bronchospasm occurs. sent7: the fact that both the bellows and the sidestep happens is not correct. sent8: the nativistness does not occur if the non-thoughtfulness and the non-paranasalness occurs. sent9: if both the non-thoughtfulness and the paranasalness happens then the nativistness does not occur. sent10: the paranasalness does not occur. sent11: that the anagrammaticness occurs and the demobilization occurs does not hold. sent12: if the nativistness does not occur that the bellowing but not the sidestep occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent3 -> int1: the nativist does not occur.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the aphasic is not a kind of a anticlimax. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: The muse gurgles tostada. sent2: the promiscuity does not strive ribaldry or it is not a dunk or both. sent3: the tostada is a kind of a misfire. sent4: the tostada does not gurgle squawker. sent5: something is a kind of a anticlimax that does gurgle muse if it does not strive ribaldry. sent6: that the aphasic does gurgle muse is right. sent7: the aphasic is not a climax. sent8: that the lobsterman is a anticlimax hold. sent9: The ribaldry does strive tostada. sent10: the tostada is a kind of a armet. sent11: the tostada does strive ribaldry. sent12: the bottom-feeder does mantle Saratov and it gurgles muse. sent13: if the tostada does gurgle muse and it strives ribaldry then the aphasic is not a anticlimax. sent14: if something does not strive ribaldry and/or it is not a dunk it does not strive ribaldry. sent15: the tostada gurgles muse. sent16: the aphasic does gurgle muse and is a anticlimax if that the tostada does not strive ribaldry hold. sent17: the tostada is a anticlimax. | sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: (¬{B}{be} v ¬{E}{be}) sent3: {JK}{a} sent4: ¬{FG}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) sent6: {A}{b} sent7: ¬{IK}{b} sent8: {C}{h} sent9: {AB}{ab} sent10: {AS}{a} sent11: {B}{a} sent12: ({IQ}{l} & {A}{l}) sent13: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent15: {A}{a} sent16: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent17: {C}{a} | [
"sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the tostada gurgles muse and it strives ribaldry is not false.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent15 & sent11 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the aphasic is a anticlimax. | {C}{b} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the aphasic is not a kind of a anticlimax. ; $context$ = sent1: The muse gurgles tostada. sent2: the promiscuity does not strive ribaldry or it is not a dunk or both. sent3: the tostada is a kind of a misfire. sent4: the tostada does not gurgle squawker. sent5: something is a kind of a anticlimax that does gurgle muse if it does not strive ribaldry. sent6: that the aphasic does gurgle muse is right. sent7: the aphasic is not a climax. sent8: that the lobsterman is a anticlimax hold. sent9: The ribaldry does strive tostada. sent10: the tostada is a kind of a armet. sent11: the tostada does strive ribaldry. sent12: the bottom-feeder does mantle Saratov and it gurgles muse. sent13: if the tostada does gurgle muse and it strives ribaldry then the aphasic is not a anticlimax. sent14: if something does not strive ribaldry and/or it is not a dunk it does not strive ribaldry. sent15: the tostada gurgles muse. sent16: the aphasic does gurgle muse and is a anticlimax if that the tostada does not strive ribaldry hold. sent17: the tostada is a anticlimax. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the tostada gurgles muse and it strives ribaldry is not false.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that that the eryngo is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric is not true is not wrong. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) | sent1: there exists something such that it is not nonindulgent and it mantles Prionotus. sent2: if something is not a dendrite then it is not a disharmony. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a blond and it does refrigerate indene is wrong. sent4: something does refrigerate indene if it is a kind of a blond. sent5: if there is something such that that it is non-blond and it does refrigerate indene is wrong the eryngo is not playful. sent6: the ratepayer is not a Anomalopidae and/or it does not refrigerate aberration. sent7: if the ratepayer is not a Anomalopidae then the eryngo does not gurgle Myroxylon. sent8: if something does refrigerate indene it is consular. sent9: a non-consular thing is both not a iconolatry and not atmospheric. sent10: that that something is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric is true is false if it is playful. sent11: the fact that something is not a iconolatry if it is not consular is not incorrect. sent12: something is not electroencephalographic if it is not radial-ply. sent13: something is not a Israeli and is a member. sent14: the eryngo is not a blond. sent15: if something is not playful then the fact that it is not consular is not wrong. sent16: the fact that the timeserver is not atmospheric hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is a blond and it refrigerates indene is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a blond and it is a kind of a Hizballah if it does not gurgle Myroxylon. | sent1: (Ex): (¬{FT}x & {ED}x) sent2: (x): ¬{HF}x -> ¬{AL}x sent3: (Ex): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) sent4: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent5: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (¬{J}{a} v ¬{I}{a}) sent7: ¬{J}{a} -> ¬{H}{aa} sent8: (x): {E}x -> {C}x sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{D}x) sent10: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{D}x) sent11: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{A}x sent12: (x): ¬{DA}x -> ¬{AJ}x sent13: (Ex): (¬{HR}x & {EE}x) sent14: ¬{F}{aa} sent15: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x sent16: ¬{D}{eh} sent17: (Ex): ¬({F}x & {E}x) sent18: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) | [
"sent15 -> int1: if the eryngo is not playful then it is not consular.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the eryngo is not playful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eryngo is not consular.; sent9 -> int4: the eryngo is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric if it is not consular.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent15 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: ¬{B}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{aa}; sent9 -> int4: ¬{C}{aa} -> (¬{A}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}); int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the eryngo is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric is not true. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) | [
"sent10 -> int5: the fact that the eryngo is both not a iconolatry and not atmospheric is not correct if it is playful.; sent8 -> int6: the eryngo is consular if it does refrigerate indene.; sent4 -> int7: if that the eryngo is a kind of a blond is true then it does refrigerate indene.; sent18 -> int8: the eryngo is blond and it is a kind of a Hizballah if it does not gurgle Myroxylon.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that that the eryngo is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric is not true is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not nonindulgent and it mantles Prionotus. sent2: if something is not a dendrite then it is not a disharmony. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a blond and it does refrigerate indene is wrong. sent4: something does refrigerate indene if it is a kind of a blond. sent5: if there is something such that that it is non-blond and it does refrigerate indene is wrong the eryngo is not playful. sent6: the ratepayer is not a Anomalopidae and/or it does not refrigerate aberration. sent7: if the ratepayer is not a Anomalopidae then the eryngo does not gurgle Myroxylon. sent8: if something does refrigerate indene it is consular. sent9: a non-consular thing is both not a iconolatry and not atmospheric. sent10: that that something is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric is true is false if it is playful. sent11: the fact that something is not a iconolatry if it is not consular is not incorrect. sent12: something is not electroencephalographic if it is not radial-ply. sent13: something is not a Israeli and is a member. sent14: the eryngo is not a blond. sent15: if something is not playful then the fact that it is not consular is not wrong. sent16: the fact that the timeserver is not atmospheric hold. sent17: there is something such that that it is a blond and it refrigerates indene is not true. sent18: something is a kind of a blond and it is a kind of a Hizballah if it does not gurgle Myroxylon. ; $proof$ = | sent15 -> int1: if the eryngo is not playful then it is not consular.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the eryngo is not playful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eryngo is not consular.; sent9 -> int4: the eryngo is not a iconolatry and it is not atmospheric if it is not consular.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the adjuvant is not a kind of a ultramontane. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: something is not a chariot if the fact that it is not a Plectrophenax and/or it is a Newtonian is not true. sent2: the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond if the fact that the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does refrigerate microsecond is right. sent3: if the deadhead is not a kind of a chariot or does not wend or both then the fact that the nortriptyline does not wend is true. sent4: something is a salpingectomy and it is a by-product if it does not wend. sent5: if something is not aerodynamic that it is not a kind of a Plectrophenax and/or is a Newtonian does not hold. sent6: the fact that the adjuvant is a ultramontane is not wrong if it is not a Virgil. sent7: the adjuvant is a kind of a Virgil and/or it is Sinhala. sent8: the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does not refrigerate microsecond. sent9: if the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does not refrigerate microsecond then the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond. sent10: that the analphabet is not aerodynamic if the pinhole is not a database and does not mantle deadhead is not incorrect. sent11: something that is not a Virgil or Sinhala or both is a ultramontane. sent12: if something is a salpingectomy it gurgles syllabub. sent13: something that does gurgle syllabub does not refrigerate microsecond and is ultramontane. sent14: the pinhole is not a database and does not mantle deadhead. sent15: the heiress either is not a reassignment or is a Virgil or both. sent16: something that does not refrigerate microsecond is not a Virgil or is Sinhala or both. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{I}x v {G}x) -> ¬{H}x sent2: (¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (¬{H}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent5: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{I}x v {G}x) sent6: ¬{AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent7: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent8: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent9: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent10: (¬{K}{d} & ¬{L}{d}) -> ¬{J}{c} sent11: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent12: (x): {D}x -> {C}x sent13: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent14: (¬{K}{d} & ¬{L}{d}) sent15: (¬{DG}{fd} v {AA}{fd}) sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) | [
"sent16 -> int1: the adjuvant is not a kind of a Virgil and/or is Sinhala if it does not refrigerate microsecond.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adjuvant is not a Virgil and/or is Sinhala.; sent11 -> int4: the adjuvant is a ultramontane if either it is not a Virgil or it is Sinhala or both.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent9 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent11 -> int4: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the adjuvant is not a kind of a ultramontane. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"sent13 -> int5: the nortriptyline does not refrigerate microsecond and is a ultramontane if it gurgles syllabub.; sent12 -> int6: if the nortriptyline is a kind of a salpingectomy it does gurgle syllabub.; sent4 -> int7: if the fact that the nortriptyline does not wend is correct then it is a salpingectomy and it is a by-product.; sent1 -> int8: the analphabet is not a chariot if the fact that it is not a Plectrophenax and/or it is a Newtonian is not right.; sent5 -> int9: the fact that the analphabet is not a Plectrophenax and/or it is a kind of a Newtonian is incorrect if it is not aerodynamic.; sent10 & sent14 -> int10: the analphabet is not aerodynamic.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the analphabet is not a Plectrophenax and/or it is a kind of a Newtonian is not right.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the analphabet does not chariot.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a chariot hold.;"
]
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the adjuvant is not a kind of a ultramontane. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a chariot if the fact that it is not a Plectrophenax and/or it is a Newtonian is not true. sent2: the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond if the fact that the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does refrigerate microsecond is right. sent3: if the deadhead is not a kind of a chariot or does not wend or both then the fact that the nortriptyline does not wend is true. sent4: something is a salpingectomy and it is a by-product if it does not wend. sent5: if something is not aerodynamic that it is not a kind of a Plectrophenax and/or is a Newtonian does not hold. sent6: the fact that the adjuvant is a ultramontane is not wrong if it is not a Virgil. sent7: the adjuvant is a kind of a Virgil and/or it is Sinhala. sent8: the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does not refrigerate microsecond. sent9: if the nortriptyline does not gurgle syllabub and does not refrigerate microsecond then the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond. sent10: that the analphabet is not aerodynamic if the pinhole is not a database and does not mantle deadhead is not incorrect. sent11: something that is not a Virgil or Sinhala or both is a ultramontane. sent12: if something is a salpingectomy it gurgles syllabub. sent13: something that does gurgle syllabub does not refrigerate microsecond and is ultramontane. sent14: the pinhole is not a database and does not mantle deadhead. sent15: the heiress either is not a reassignment or is a Virgil or both. sent16: something that does not refrigerate microsecond is not a Virgil or is Sinhala or both. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: the adjuvant is not a kind of a Virgil and/or is Sinhala if it does not refrigerate microsecond.; sent9 & sent8 -> int2: the adjuvant does not refrigerate microsecond.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adjuvant is not a Virgil and/or is Sinhala.; sent11 -> int4: the adjuvant is a ultramontane if either it is not a Virgil or it is Sinhala or both.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that both the non-acroscopicness and the favorableness occurs is not incorrect. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the refrigerating lycanthropy happens. sent2: if the fact that the consulship occurs is right not the mantling conch but the maxiness occurs. sent3: the striving VA occurs. sent4: the cavalcade occurs if the insulation occurs. sent5: the non-Olympicsness is prevented by that the residentialness occurs. sent6: if the gurgling wonton happens then the supervision happens. sent7: the wieldiness does not occur and the mantling resinoid occurs. sent8: the Sin does not occur and the gurgling insomniac happens. sent9: the effectiveness does not occur and the mantling fretted happens. sent10: both the non-wieldiness and the mantling assemblywoman occurs if the clarion happens. sent11: if the recital happens then the fact that the burning does not occur and the will-o'-the-wisp happens is not incorrect. sent12: that the refrigerating lycanthropy occurs causes that the non-acroscopicness and the favorableness happens. sent13: the fact that the demoralization happens is right. | sent1: {A} sent2: {IN} -> (¬{DJ} & {CB}) sent3: {EP} sent4: {FJ} -> {BD} sent5: {HH} -> {HG} sent6: {IB} -> {FO} sent7: (¬{DF} & {BB}) sent8: (¬{DR} & {AN}) sent9: (¬{BC} & {AQ}) sent10: {JK} -> (¬{DF} & {S}) sent11: {FI} -> (¬{GR} & {ID}) sent12: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent13: {DG} | [
"sent12 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent12 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that both the non-acroscopicness and the favorableness occurs is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the refrigerating lycanthropy happens. sent2: if the fact that the consulship occurs is right not the mantling conch but the maxiness occurs. sent3: the striving VA occurs. sent4: the cavalcade occurs if the insulation occurs. sent5: the non-Olympicsness is prevented by that the residentialness occurs. sent6: if the gurgling wonton happens then the supervision happens. sent7: the wieldiness does not occur and the mantling resinoid occurs. sent8: the Sin does not occur and the gurgling insomniac happens. sent9: the effectiveness does not occur and the mantling fretted happens. sent10: both the non-wieldiness and the mantling assemblywoman occurs if the clarion happens. sent11: if the recital happens then the fact that the burning does not occur and the will-o'-the-wisp happens is not incorrect. sent12: that the refrigerating lycanthropy occurs causes that the non-acroscopicness and the favorableness happens. sent13: the fact that the demoralization happens is right. ; $proof$ = | sent12 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the cannery does saddle and/or it is a nadir hold. | ({C}{b} v {D}{b}) | sent1: the cannery is a kind of a saddle if the implant is intradermal. sent2: if something does not mantle Anadenanthera then that it saddles or is a nadir or both does not hold. | sent1: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {D}x) | []
| []
| the fact that the cannery is a kind of a saddle and/or it is a nadir does not hold. | ¬({C}{b} v {D}{b}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: the fact that the cannery saddles and/or it is a nadir is not true if it does not mantle Anadenanthera.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the cannery does saddle and/or it is a nadir hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the cannery is a kind of a saddle if the implant is intradermal. sent2: if something does not mantle Anadenanthera then that it saddles or is a nadir or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic is not true. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: if the emulsion is not a self-preservation then it is not a seating and mantles Dipogon. sent2: if the fact that the adjuvant is a signal-to-noise but it does not creep is not incorrect then it is not algometric. sent3: something that does not refrigerate moire does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic. sent4: if the emulsion is a kind of a thrum then it is not non-occlusive and it does not refrigerate moire. sent5: the adjuvant is both a signal-to-noise and not a creeps if it is a downbeat. sent6: if the fact that the emulsion mantles Dipogon is correct then that it does seat and it does not gurgle teasing hold. sent7: if the phospholipid does mantle Dipogon then it is not non-minor. sent8: the emulsion is occlusive if it is a thrum. sent9: if something does not refrigerate moire it is catholic. sent10: the photosphere does mantle Dipogon. sent11: the photosphere is typical and is not a kind of a thrum. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a fizz that is not a Elastoplast is right is wrong. sent13: something does not satisfy but it is italic if it is not algometric. sent14: that the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic does not hold if the rotavirus is a thrum. sent15: the emulsion is a thrum if it does refrigerate sectarianism. sent16: the emulsion is a thrum. sent17: the emulsion is a kind of a paleomammalogy that is not a fizz if it is a Quebec. sent18: the fact that something is not occlusive but it mantles Dipogon is correct if it is not catholic. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-catholic thing that mantles Dipogon is not true if it fritters. sent20: the uraninite is a thrum. sent21: everything fritters. | sent1: ¬{AP}{a} -> (¬{S}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: ({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} sent3: (x): ¬{AB}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) sent4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: {J}{c} -> ({I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent6: {B}{a} -> ({S}{a} & ¬{DH}{a}) sent7: {B}{gh} -> {BP}{gh} sent8: {A}{a} -> {AA}{a} sent9: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {C}x sent10: {B}{hq} sent11: ({GT}{hq} & ¬{A}{hq}) sent12: (Ex): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) sent13: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) sent14: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: {CG}{a} -> {A}{a} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: {DI}{a} -> ({AJ}{a} & ¬{K}{a}) sent18: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{AA}x & {B}x) sent19: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) sent20: {A}{q} sent21: (x): {D}x | [
"sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the emulsion is occlusive but it does not refrigerate moire.; int1 -> int2: the emulsion does not refrigerate moire.; sent3 -> int3: the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon but it is catholic if it does not refrigerate moire.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent16 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AB}{a}; sent3 -> int3: ¬{AB}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the timer is not occlusive. | ¬{AA}{eh} | [
"sent19 -> int4: that the rotavirus is not catholic but it does mantle Dipogon is wrong if it fritters.; sent21 -> int5: the rotavirus fritters.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the rotavirus is not catholic but it mantles Dipogon is not right.; int6 -> int7: there is nothing that is not catholic and mantles Dipogon.; int7 -> int8: that the emulsion is not catholic and does mantle Dipogon is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not catholic and it does mantle Dipogon is not right.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the emulsion is not a self-preservation then it is not a seating and mantles Dipogon. sent2: if the fact that the adjuvant is a signal-to-noise but it does not creep is not incorrect then it is not algometric. sent3: something that does not refrigerate moire does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic. sent4: if the emulsion is a kind of a thrum then it is not non-occlusive and it does not refrigerate moire. sent5: the adjuvant is both a signal-to-noise and not a creeps if it is a downbeat. sent6: if the fact that the emulsion mantles Dipogon is correct then that it does seat and it does not gurgle teasing hold. sent7: if the phospholipid does mantle Dipogon then it is not non-minor. sent8: the emulsion is occlusive if it is a thrum. sent9: if something does not refrigerate moire it is catholic. sent10: the photosphere does mantle Dipogon. sent11: the photosphere is typical and is not a kind of a thrum. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a fizz that is not a Elastoplast is right is wrong. sent13: something does not satisfy but it is italic if it is not algometric. sent14: that the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon and is catholic does not hold if the rotavirus is a thrum. sent15: the emulsion is a thrum if it does refrigerate sectarianism. sent16: the emulsion is a thrum. sent17: the emulsion is a kind of a paleomammalogy that is not a fizz if it is a Quebec. sent18: the fact that something is not occlusive but it mantles Dipogon is correct if it is not catholic. sent19: the fact that something is a kind of non-catholic thing that mantles Dipogon is not true if it fritters. sent20: the uraninite is a thrum. sent21: everything fritters. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the emulsion is occlusive but it does not refrigerate moire.; int1 -> int2: the emulsion does not refrigerate moire.; sent3 -> int3: the emulsion does not mantle Dipogon but it is catholic if it does not refrigerate moire.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it is not contralateral it is not apogean and/or it is a pya is wrong. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x)) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a crocolite then either it is a soaking or it does refrigerate hairnet or both. sent2: if the bungler is contralateral it is non-apogean and/or it is a pya. sent3: that something arouses or it is a Abilene or both is correct if it is not a kind of a cords. sent4: something is not apogean and/or is a kind of a pya if it is not contralateral. sent5: there is something such that if it is archaistic then it is not unbroken or is a kind of a liposome or both. sent6: either the hooker is apogean or it is a retinoblastoma or both if it is not acquisitive. sent7: something is not tuneless or it is archaistic or both if it is not a Celtic. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{FO}x -> ({DB}x v {CC}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{EN}x -> ({AS}x v {HQ}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent5: (Ex): {EE}x -> (¬{BG}x v {DC}x) sent6: ¬{JJ}{dn} -> ({AA}{dn} v {EH}{dn}) sent7: (x): ¬{EA}x -> (¬{IL}x v {EE}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the bungler is not contralateral it is not apogean and/or it is a kind of a pya.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not contralateral it is not apogean and/or it is a pya is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a crocolite then either it is a soaking or it does refrigerate hairnet or both. sent2: if the bungler is contralateral it is non-apogean and/or it is a pya. sent3: that something arouses or it is a Abilene or both is correct if it is not a kind of a cords. sent4: something is not apogean and/or is a kind of a pya if it is not contralateral. sent5: there is something such that if it is archaistic then it is not unbroken or is a kind of a liposome or both. sent6: either the hooker is apogean or it is a retinoblastoma or both if it is not acquisitive. sent7: something is not tuneless or it is archaistic or both if it is not a Celtic. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: if the bungler is not contralateral it is not apogean and/or it is a kind of a pya.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the forte occurs. | {A} | sent1: if the nonproprietariness does not occur then the fact that the president and the non-forteness occurs is false. sent2: if that the president but not the forte occurs does not hold then the gurgling ranger does not occur. sent3: if both the scuffling and the shriving occurs then the nonproprietariness does not occur. sent4: the scuffle and the aligning occurs if the mantling 401-k does not occur. sent5: the endodonticsness or the non-frictionalness or both happens. sent6: if the president occurs the forte occurs. sent7: that the endodonticsness or the non-frictionalness or both happens prevents that the president does not occur. | sent1: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & ¬{A}) sent2: ¬({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{CF} sent3: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬{H} -> ({D} & {F}) sent5: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent6: {B} -> {A} sent7: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the president happens.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: {B}; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the Moon happens or the gurgling ranger does not occur or both hold. | ({AP} v ¬{CF}) | []
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the forte occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nonproprietariness does not occur then the fact that the president and the non-forteness occurs is false. sent2: if that the president but not the forte occurs does not hold then the gurgling ranger does not occur. sent3: if both the scuffling and the shriving occurs then the nonproprietariness does not occur. sent4: the scuffle and the aligning occurs if the mantling 401-k does not occur. sent5: the endodonticsness or the non-frictionalness or both happens. sent6: if the president occurs the forte occurs. sent7: that the endodonticsness or the non-frictionalness or both happens prevents that the president does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the president happens.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if that it is not tegular is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a acoustician and is not intractable is not true. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is tegular then it is not a acoustician and it is not intractable. sent2: something is not qualitative and is not a kind of a Lorenz if it is not proportionate. sent3: the crater is not a acoustician and is intractable if that it is not tegular is correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a radiochlorine then it is not an arrangement and it does not celebrate. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not tegular it is a acoustician and it is not intractable. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a surrey it is not catechistic and does not refrigerate rudder. sent7: something does not refrigerate swan and does not refrigerate condition if it is not a kind of a ferry. sent8: the crater is both not a acoustician and not intractable if that it is not tegular is correct. sent9: the crater is both not a acoustician and not psychotherapeutic if it is not oracular. sent10: the copepod is not a acoustician and it does not own if it is not incomplete. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not tegular it is not intractable. sent12: the crater is not a acoustician and not intractable if it is tegular. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not tegular then it is not a acoustician and it is intractable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a halogen it is not a hoot and it is not oracular. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not tegular it is not a acoustician is not incorrect. sent16: if the crater is not tegular it is not a acoustician. | sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬{AD}x -> (¬{HR}x & ¬{P}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{F}x -> (¬{FT}x & ¬{BB}x) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{IC}x -> (¬{EE}x & ¬{GR}x) sent7: (x): ¬{BN}x -> (¬{FQ}x & ¬{FS}x) sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: ¬{HA}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{CK}{aa}) sent10: ¬{EM}{gn} -> (¬{AA}{gn} & ¬{EQ}{gn}) sent11: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent12: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬{HB}x -> (¬{FD}x & ¬{HA}x) sent15: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent16: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the oxalis is not qualitative and is not a Lorenz if it is not proportionate. | ¬{AD}{hi} -> (¬{HR}{hi} & ¬{P}{hi}) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is not tegular is not incorrect then it is not a kind of a acoustician and is not intractable is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is tegular then it is not a acoustician and it is not intractable. sent2: something is not qualitative and is not a kind of a Lorenz if it is not proportionate. sent3: the crater is not a acoustician and is intractable if that it is not tegular is correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a radiochlorine then it is not an arrangement and it does not celebrate. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not tegular it is a acoustician and it is not intractable. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a surrey it is not catechistic and does not refrigerate rudder. sent7: something does not refrigerate swan and does not refrigerate condition if it is not a kind of a ferry. sent8: the crater is both not a acoustician and not intractable if that it is not tegular is correct. sent9: the crater is both not a acoustician and not psychotherapeutic if it is not oracular. sent10: the copepod is not a acoustician and it does not own if it is not incomplete. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not tegular it is not intractable. sent12: the crater is not a acoustician and not intractable if it is tegular. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not tegular then it is not a acoustician and it is intractable. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a halogen it is not a hoot and it is not oracular. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not tegular it is not a acoustician is not incorrect. sent16: if the crater is not tegular it is not a acoustician. ; $proof$ = | sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the historicalness happens. | {A} | sent1: the fact that the mimicry happens is right. sent2: if the mantling pretrial happens then the fact that either the gurgling self-pity happens or the puncture does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the historicalness happens. sent4: the high-riseness happens. sent5: the mantling basidiomycete occurs. sent6: if the vesicularness does not occur then the striving abridger happens and the caprineness occurs. sent7: the non-engagement occurs. sent8: the fact that the autotomicness happens hold. sent9: the mantling pretrial but not the mintage happens if the caprineness occurs. sent10: if that the striving abridger does not occur but the caprineness happens does not hold the mintage does not occur. sent11: the mantling pretrial occurs and/or the puncture occurs if the mintage does not occur. sent12: the historicalness happens and the non-engagement occurs if the gurgling self-pity does not occur. sent13: the enhancing happens. sent14: the historicalness does not occur if that the gurgling self-pity occurs or the puncture does not occur or both is incorrect. | sent1: {K} sent2: {D} -> ¬({B} v ¬{C}) sent3: {A} sent4: {FQ} sent5: {HT} sent6: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) sent7: {AP} sent8: {GF} sent9: {F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) sent10: ¬(¬{G} & {F}) -> ¬{E} sent11: ¬{E} -> ({D} v {C}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AP}) sent13: {II} sent14: ¬({B} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the non-engagement happens. | {AP} | []
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the historicalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mimicry happens is right. sent2: if the mantling pretrial happens then the fact that either the gurgling self-pity happens or the puncture does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the historicalness happens. sent4: the high-riseness happens. sent5: the mantling basidiomycete occurs. sent6: if the vesicularness does not occur then the striving abridger happens and the caprineness occurs. sent7: the non-engagement occurs. sent8: the fact that the autotomicness happens hold. sent9: the mantling pretrial but not the mintage happens if the caprineness occurs. sent10: if that the striving abridger does not occur but the caprineness happens does not hold the mintage does not occur. sent11: the mantling pretrial occurs and/or the puncture occurs if the mintage does not occur. sent12: the historicalness happens and the non-engagement occurs if the gurgling self-pity does not occur. sent13: the enhancing happens. sent14: the historicalness does not occur if that the gurgling self-pity occurs or the puncture does not occur or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the bacchanal mantles acerola or does mantle suprematism or both does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} v {B}{a}) | sent1: there exists something such that that it is a psalterium that is not a doodad is not true. sent2: the fact that the origanum is not a psalterium and is not a kind of a doodad is wrong. sent3: something that is unopposable is both not a dell and not a tagliatelle. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a psalterium and a doodad does not hold. sent5: that the origanum is both not a psalterium and a doodad is not true. sent6: if something is not a drawing then that either it mantles acerola or it mantles suprematism or both is not true. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a psalterium and it is not a doodad is false the bacchanal mantles acerola. sent8: the fact that the bacchanal does mantle acerola hold if there exists something such that it is a doodad. sent9: there is something such that it is not a psalterium and not a doodad. sent10: that the origanum does not mantle acerola but it is a kind of a doodad does not hold. sent11: if something is not a dell and is not a tagliatelle it is not a kind of a drawing. sent12: something mantles suprematism and it does mantle acerola if it is not a drawing. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x v {B}x) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent8: (x): {AB}x -> {A}{a} sent9: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent11: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is both not a psalterium and not a doodad is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bacchanal does mantle acerola.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent7 -> int2: {A}{a}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the bacchanal does mantle acerola and/or it mantles suprematism is not right. | ¬({A}{a} v {B}{a}) | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the bacchanal does not draw the fact that it does mantle acerola and/or mantles suprematism is not correct.; sent11 -> int4: if the bacchanal is both not a dell and not a tagliatelle it is not a drawing.; sent3 -> int5: if the bacchanal is unopposable it is not a kind of a dell and it is not a tagliatelle.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the bacchanal mantles acerola or does mantle suprematism or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a psalterium that is not a doodad is not true. sent2: the fact that the origanum is not a psalterium and is not a kind of a doodad is wrong. sent3: something that is unopposable is both not a dell and not a tagliatelle. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not a psalterium and a doodad does not hold. sent5: that the origanum is both not a psalterium and a doodad is not true. sent6: if something is not a drawing then that either it mantles acerola or it mantles suprematism or both is not true. sent7: if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a psalterium and it is not a doodad is false the bacchanal mantles acerola. sent8: the fact that the bacchanal does mantle acerola hold if there exists something such that it is a doodad. sent9: there is something such that it is not a psalterium and not a doodad. sent10: that the origanum does not mantle acerola but it is a kind of a doodad does not hold. sent11: if something is not a dell and is not a tagliatelle it is not a kind of a drawing. sent12: something mantles suprematism and it does mantle acerola if it is not a drawing. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that that it is both not a psalterium and not a doodad is not incorrect does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the bacchanal does mantle acerola.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the coaling occurs is not incorrect. | {A} | sent1: if the aortalness does not occur the abbatialness occurs but the mantling Warhol does not occur. sent2: that the mantling Warhol does not occur triggers that the marauding occurs and the indication does not occur. sent3: that the indication does not occur yields that the soubrette occurs or the mantling tremble occurs or both. sent4: that the monopsony does not occur yields the fact that that both the non-menstrualness and the non-inertialness occurs is right. sent5: the fact that the refrigerating DINK does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the fearing does not occur if that either the executing or the howler or both occurs is not correct. sent7: that the refrigerating DINK does not occur brings about that the refrigerating screenplay happens and the venipuncture occurs. sent8: the fact that if the refrigerating screenplay happens then the monopsony does not occur is correct. sent9: if the coaling occurs then that the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur is not true. sent10: that the mantling tremble happens hold. sent11: that the mantling tremble happens leads to that the refrigerating DINK does not occur. sent12: the indication happens if the marauding happens but the mantling Warhol does not occur. sent13: the cantillation and/or the non-opposableness occurs if the fearing does not occur. sent14: the call and the coal happens if the mantling tremble does not occur. sent15: the aortalness and the non-abbatialness happens if the narrowing occurs. sent16: if the mantling tremble occurs then the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the mantling tremble does not occur and the soubrette does not occur hold is caused by that the indication occurs. sent18: that the marauding but not the mantling Warhol occurs is triggered by the non-abbatialness. sent19: that the gurgling playlet and the narrowness occurs is caused by the non-heavyness. sent20: if the menstrualness does not occur that that the executing or the howler or both occurs is not correct is not false. sent21: the heaviness does not occur if the fact that the cantillation happens hold. | sent1: ¬{H} -> ({G} & ¬{F}) sent2: ¬{F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) sent3: ¬{D} -> ({C} v {B}) sent4: ¬{S} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{R}) sent5: ¬{AA} sent6: ¬({P} v {O}) -> ¬{N} sent7: ¬{AA} -> ({T} & {U}) sent8: {T} -> ¬{S} sent9: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent10: {B} sent11: {B} -> ¬{AA} sent12: ({E} & ¬{F}) -> {D} sent13: ¬{N} -> ({L} v ¬{M}) sent14: ¬{B} -> ({DF} & {A}) sent15: {I} -> ({H} & ¬{G}) sent16: {B} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent17: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent18: ¬{G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) sent19: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) sent20: ¬{Q} -> ¬({P} v {O}) sent21: {L} -> ¬{K} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coaling occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur is not correct.; sent16 & sent10 -> int2: the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); sent16 & sent10 -> int2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the call happens. | {DF} | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the refrigerating screenplay occurs and the venipuncture occurs hold.; int4 -> int5: that the refrigerating screenplay occurs hold.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the monopsony does not occur.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the non-menstrualness and the non-inertialness happens.; int7 -> int8: the menstrualness does not occur.; sent20 & int8 -> int9: the fact that either the executing or the howler or both occurs is wrong.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the fear does not occur.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the cantillation or the non-opposableness or both happens.;"
]
| 19 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the coaling occurs is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aortalness does not occur the abbatialness occurs but the mantling Warhol does not occur. sent2: that the mantling Warhol does not occur triggers that the marauding occurs and the indication does not occur. sent3: that the indication does not occur yields that the soubrette occurs or the mantling tremble occurs or both. sent4: that the monopsony does not occur yields the fact that that both the non-menstrualness and the non-inertialness occurs is right. sent5: the fact that the refrigerating DINK does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the fearing does not occur if that either the executing or the howler or both occurs is not correct. sent7: that the refrigerating DINK does not occur brings about that the refrigerating screenplay happens and the venipuncture occurs. sent8: the fact that if the refrigerating screenplay happens then the monopsony does not occur is correct. sent9: if the coaling occurs then that the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur is not true. sent10: that the mantling tremble happens hold. sent11: that the mantling tremble happens leads to that the refrigerating DINK does not occur. sent12: the indication happens if the marauding happens but the mantling Warhol does not occur. sent13: the cantillation and/or the non-opposableness occurs if the fearing does not occur. sent14: the call and the coal happens if the mantling tremble does not occur. sent15: the aortalness and the non-abbatialness happens if the narrowing occurs. sent16: if the mantling tremble occurs then the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the mantling tremble does not occur and the soubrette does not occur hold is caused by that the indication occurs. sent18: that the marauding but not the mantling Warhol occurs is triggered by the non-abbatialness. sent19: that the gurgling playlet and the narrowness occurs is caused by the non-heavyness. sent20: if the menstrualness does not occur that that the executing or the howler or both occurs is not correct is not false. sent21: the heaviness does not occur if the fact that the cantillation happens hold. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coaling occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur is not correct.; sent16 & sent10 -> int2: the refrigerating DINK does not occur and the refrigerating silurid does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.