version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance | the May does not strengthen apomict. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: the limekiln does slalom and/or it is representational if the crowbait is not a kind of a kainite. sent2: the fact that something is a fluorapatite is not wrong. sent3: the May is hand-held and is a Zizania. sent4: the potoroo is a dark if the limekiln is a slalom. sent5: the cantle is not a kind of a murine if there is something such that it does not chondrify backplate. sent6: the lipid is not a fetter if there exists something such that that it does strengthen apomict and does not invade chachalaca is wrong. sent7: if the reagin is not varicelliform it invades chachalaca and is a tricycle. sent8: that the reagin is a fetter and it is a M is not wrong. sent9: the reagin is a M. sent10: the May does not strengthen apomict if the reagin is both a tricycle and a fetter. sent11: the reagin does strengthen apomict. sent12: that the potoroo is a kind of a dark is not false if the limekiln is representational. sent13: the reagin is a tricycle. sent14: that the May is not a kind of an importer hold if something is not gregarious. sent15: if that the May is both not a truss and varicelliform is wrong the lipid is a tricycle. sent16: the obstructionist is ungregarious if there exists something such that it is a kind of a dark. sent17: the fact that the crowbait is not a kainite is right. sent18: the Sorbian does not chondrify backplate if something is a fluorapatite. sent19: the fact that something is not a truss but it is varicelliform does not hold if it is not a kind of an importer. sent20: that the reagin strengthens apomict but it does not invade chachalaca is false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a murine is true. sent21: that something is a fetter and it does strengthen apomict is correct if it is not a M. | sent1: ¬{P}{h} -> ({O}{g} v {N}{g}) sent2: (Ex): {M}x sent3: ({GG}{b} & {FQ}{b}) sent4: {O}{g} -> {K}{e} sent5: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬{I}{c} sent6: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}{is} sent7: ¬{F}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {C}{a}) sent8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent9: {B}{a} sent10: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent11: {D}{a} sent12: {N}{g} -> {K}{e} sent13: {C}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬{H}{b} sent15: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {C}{is} sent16: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}{d} sent17: ¬{P}{h} sent18: (x): {M}x -> ¬{L}{f} sent19: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) sent20: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent21: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) | [
"sent8 -> int1: the reagin does fetter.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the reagin is a tricycle and it is a fetter.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}); int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the lipid is not a kind of a M is not wrong. | ¬{B}{is} | [
"sent19 -> int3: that if the May is not the importer then the fact that the May is not a kind of a truss but it is varicelliform is incorrect is correct.; sent1 & sent17 -> int4: the limekiln is a slalom and/or is not nonrepresentational.; int4 & sent4 & sent12 -> int5: the potoroo is a kind of a dark.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a dark.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the obstructionist is not gregarious.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not gregarious.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the May is not an importer.; int3 & int9 -> int10: that the May is not a truss but it is varicelliform does not hold.; sent15 & int10 -> int11: the lipid is a tricycle.; sent2 & sent18 -> int12: the Sorbian does not chondrify backplate.; int12 -> int13: something does not chondrify backplate.; int13 & sent5 -> int14: the cantle is not murine.; int14 -> int15: something is not murine.; int15 & sent20 -> int16: that that the reagin does strengthen apomict but it does not invade chachalaca hold does not hold.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it does strengthen apomict and does not invade chachalaca is incorrect.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the lipid does not fetter.; int11 & int18 -> int19: the lipid is a tricycle and not a fetter.;"
]
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the May does not strengthen apomict. ; $context$ = sent1: the limekiln does slalom and/or it is representational if the crowbait is not a kind of a kainite. sent2: the fact that something is a fluorapatite is not wrong. sent3: the May is hand-held and is a Zizania. sent4: the potoroo is a dark if the limekiln is a slalom. sent5: the cantle is not a kind of a murine if there is something such that it does not chondrify backplate. sent6: the lipid is not a fetter if there exists something such that that it does strengthen apomict and does not invade chachalaca is wrong. sent7: if the reagin is not varicelliform it invades chachalaca and is a tricycle. sent8: that the reagin is a fetter and it is a M is not wrong. sent9: the reagin is a M. sent10: the May does not strengthen apomict if the reagin is both a tricycle and a fetter. sent11: the reagin does strengthen apomict. sent12: that the potoroo is a kind of a dark is not false if the limekiln is representational. sent13: the reagin is a tricycle. sent14: that the May is not a kind of an importer hold if something is not gregarious. sent15: if that the May is both not a truss and varicelliform is wrong the lipid is a tricycle. sent16: the obstructionist is ungregarious if there exists something such that it is a kind of a dark. sent17: the fact that the crowbait is not a kainite is right. sent18: the Sorbian does not chondrify backplate if something is a fluorapatite. sent19: the fact that something is not a truss but it is varicelliform does not hold if it is not a kind of an importer. sent20: that the reagin strengthens apomict but it does not invade chachalaca is false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a murine is true. sent21: that something is a fetter and it does strengthen apomict is correct if it is not a M. ; $proof$ = | sent8 -> int1: the reagin does fetter.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the reagin is a tricycle and it is a fetter.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Midway is a kind of a tall but it does not invade ability. | ({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) | sent1: The megohm strengthens quahog. sent2: if the quahog is not a missionary then the motmot is not a kind of a tall. sent3: if the quahog does strengthen megohm then it is not bloodless and/or it is not a missionary. sent4: the Midway is a kind of tall thing that does not invade ability if the motmot is not tall. sent5: that the motmot is not a tall hold if the quahog is bloody. sent6: the quahog strengthens megohm. | sent1: {AC}{aa} sent2: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent5: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent6: {A}{a} | [
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: either the quahog is not bloodless or it is not missionary or both.; int1 & sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the motmot is not a tall.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent6 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & sent5 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the Midway is a kind of a tall but it does not invade ability. ; $context$ = sent1: The megohm strengthens quahog. sent2: if the quahog is not a missionary then the motmot is not a kind of a tall. sent3: if the quahog does strengthen megohm then it is not bloodless and/or it is not a missionary. sent4: the Midway is a kind of tall thing that does not invade ability if the motmot is not tall. sent5: that the motmot is not a tall hold if the quahog is bloody. sent6: the quahog strengthens megohm. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent6 -> int1: either the quahog is not bloodless or it is not missionary or both.; int1 & sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the motmot is not a tall.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Liquidambar is a U.S. and/or it middles. | ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) | sent1: something is a kind of kinesthetic thing that invades Loestrin if it is not wise. sent2: the Liquidambar is a U.S. if it is unprotective. sent3: if the Liquidambar is a middling then the Loestrin does middling. sent4: if something is kinesthetic and invades Loestrin it is not unprotective. sent5: the fact that something is a U.S. and/or is a middling does not hold if the fact that it is not unprotective is correct. | sent1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent3: {C}{a} -> {C}{gl} sent4: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x v {C}x) | []
| []
| the Loestrin does middle. | {C}{gl} | []
| 5 | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Liquidambar is a U.S. and/or it middles. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of kinesthetic thing that invades Loestrin if it is not wise. sent2: the Liquidambar is a U.S. if it is unprotective. sent3: if the Liquidambar is a middling then the Loestrin does middling. sent4: if something is kinesthetic and invades Loestrin it is not unprotective. sent5: the fact that something is a U.S. and/or is a middling does not hold if the fact that it is not unprotective is correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the easing does not occur. | ¬{E} | sent1: the impalpableness does not occur. sent2: that the easing occurs and the aborting happens is brought about by that the womanhood does not occur. sent3: the slurring does not occur. sent4: both the anagogicness and the abort occurs if the womanhood does not occur. sent5: the invading nondriver does not occur and the smashing does not occur if the likeliness occurs. sent6: that the impalpableness does not occur causes that both the strengthening sportscast and the invading Reiter occurs. sent7: the fact that if the aliveness occurs then the carcinogenicness happens hold. sent8: the non-three-dimensionalness is triggered by that the fusing whale occurs or that the rinsing occurs or both. sent9: the amputation does not occur. sent10: the vomiting happens and/or the exotericness happens. sent11: the voluntary and the ratcheting happens. sent12: that the reception does not occur is brought about by that the persuasion and/or the invading greeter occurs. sent13: that the womanhood occurs is right. sent14: the eurythmy happens. sent15: if that the unlikelyness and the smashing happens is wrong the invading nondriver occurs. sent16: the aborting occurs and the womanhood happens. sent17: the fact that the fact that both the non-likeliness and the smashing happens is not true is correct if the chondrifying jejunity occurs. sent18: if the schlep happens then the easing does not occur. sent19: that the easing but not the schlep occurs is brought about by that the invading nondriver happens. sent20: the likeliness occurs and the chondrifying jejunity happens if the strengthening sportscast does not occur. sent21: the fact that the schlep does not occur but the simoom occurs is not true if the invading nondriver does not occur. sent22: the simoom happens if the abort happens. | sent1: ¬{L} sent2: ¬{B} -> ({E} & {A}) sent3: ¬{AH} sent4: ¬{B} -> ({DR} & {A}) sent5: {H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent6: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) sent7: {CU} -> {HJ} sent8: ({GO} v {IK}) -> ¬{EH} sent9: ¬{HO} sent10: ({GB} v {DC}) sent11: ({FT} & {S}) sent12: ({EB} v {GK}) -> ¬{CH} sent13: {B} sent14: {JD} sent15: ¬(¬{H} & {G}) -> {F} sent16: ({A} & {B}) sent17: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {G}) sent18: {D} -> ¬{E} sent19: {F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) sent20: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) sent21: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) sent22: {A} -> {C} | [
"sent16 -> int1: the abort happens.; sent22 & int1 -> int2: the simoom happens.; int2 -> int3: the schlep or the simoom or both happens.;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> int1: {A}; sent22 & int1 -> int2: {C}; int2 -> int3: ({D} v {C});"
]
| the anagogicness occurs. | {DR} | [
"sent6 & sent1 -> int4: the strengthening sportscast occurs and the invading Reiter occurs.; int4 -> int5: the strengthening sportscast happens.;"
]
| 11 | 4 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the easing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the impalpableness does not occur. sent2: that the easing occurs and the aborting happens is brought about by that the womanhood does not occur. sent3: the slurring does not occur. sent4: both the anagogicness and the abort occurs if the womanhood does not occur. sent5: the invading nondriver does not occur and the smashing does not occur if the likeliness occurs. sent6: that the impalpableness does not occur causes that both the strengthening sportscast and the invading Reiter occurs. sent7: the fact that if the aliveness occurs then the carcinogenicness happens hold. sent8: the non-three-dimensionalness is triggered by that the fusing whale occurs or that the rinsing occurs or both. sent9: the amputation does not occur. sent10: the vomiting happens and/or the exotericness happens. sent11: the voluntary and the ratcheting happens. sent12: that the reception does not occur is brought about by that the persuasion and/or the invading greeter occurs. sent13: that the womanhood occurs is right. sent14: the eurythmy happens. sent15: if that the unlikelyness and the smashing happens is wrong the invading nondriver occurs. sent16: the aborting occurs and the womanhood happens. sent17: the fact that the fact that both the non-likeliness and the smashing happens is not true is correct if the chondrifying jejunity occurs. sent18: if the schlep happens then the easing does not occur. sent19: that the easing but not the schlep occurs is brought about by that the invading nondriver happens. sent20: the likeliness occurs and the chondrifying jejunity happens if the strengthening sportscast does not occur. sent21: the fact that the schlep does not occur but the simoom occurs is not true if the invading nondriver does not occur. sent22: the simoom happens if the abort happens. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: the abort happens.; sent22 & int1 -> int2: the simoom happens.; int2 -> int3: the schlep or the simoom or both happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the macintosh is not a kind of a Springfield. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: there is something such that it does not radicalize and/or is not a Tamus. sent2: the igloo is a Pulex. sent3: if the dug does strengthen demotion but it is not a redbird then the macintosh does not invade dosimetry. sent4: if something is a Pulex then the igloo strengthens suiting and it is a kind of a lunch. sent5: if something is apophyseal then it strengthens suiting. sent6: if the byssus is not a kind of an abolitionist then it is not apophyseal and it is not a redbird. sent7: the macintosh is not a Springfield if it is both a decay and not non-abaxial. sent8: if that the macintosh does wrong hold then the fact that the tramp does not invade NAD hold. sent9: the macintosh is a kind of a wrong that does invade dosimetry if there is something such that it does strengthen suiting. sent10: if the byssus is non-apophyseal thing that is not a redbird the dug is a redbird. sent11: if there is something such that it does not radicalize and/or it is not a Tamus the kennel is a kind of a Pulex. sent12: if something does not strengthen demotion or it is a kind of a Springfield or both the tramp is a Springfield. sent13: the byssus is unconquerable and is pentatonic. sent14: the milord is an ethyl but not abaxial. sent15: if something is unconquerable and it is pentatonic it is not an abolitionist. sent16: if the macintosh is a kind of a decay but it is non-abaxial then it is not a kind of a Springfield. sent17: something does not strengthen demotion and/or it is a Springfield if it is a kind of a redbird. sent18: the macintosh is not abaxial. sent19: the macintosh is both a decay and not abaxial. sent20: something is a Springfield and it is a wrong if it does not invade dosimetry. sent21: if the igloo is not an abolitionist then it is both apophyseal and a lunch. sent22: the igloo is not a kind of an abolitionist if it is a Pulex. | sent1: (Ex): (¬{M}x v ¬{N}x) sent2: {J}{c} sent3: ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent4: (x): {J}x -> ({F}{c} & {H}{c}) sent5: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent6: ¬{I}{d} -> (¬{G}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent7: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent8: {A}{a} -> ¬{IM}{q} sent9: (x): {F}x -> ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) sent10: (¬{G}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) -> {E}{b} sent11: (x): (¬{M}x v ¬{N}x) -> {J}{e} sent12: (x): (¬{D}x v {B}x) -> {B}{q} sent13: ({L}{d} & {K}{d}) sent14: ({FA}{ig} & ¬{AB}{ig}) sent15: (x): ({L}x & {K}x) -> ¬{I}x sent16: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent17: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x v {B}x) sent18: ¬{AB}{a} sent19: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent20: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent21: ¬{I}{c} -> ({G}{c} & {H}{c}) sent22: {J}{c} -> ¬{I}{c} | [
"sent16 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the macintosh is a Springfield. | {B}{a} | [
"sent20 -> int1: the macintosh is a kind of a Springfield and it wrongs if it does not invade dosimetry.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the igloo is apophyseal is not incorrect then the fact that it does strengthen suiting hold.; sent22 & sent2 -> int3: the igloo is not an abolitionist.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the igloo is apophyseal thing that is a kind of a lunch.; int4 -> int5: the igloo is not non-apophyseal.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the igloo strengthens suiting.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it strengthens suiting.;"
]
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the macintosh is not a kind of a Springfield. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not radicalize and/or is not a Tamus. sent2: the igloo is a Pulex. sent3: if the dug does strengthen demotion but it is not a redbird then the macintosh does not invade dosimetry. sent4: if something is a Pulex then the igloo strengthens suiting and it is a kind of a lunch. sent5: if something is apophyseal then it strengthens suiting. sent6: if the byssus is not a kind of an abolitionist then it is not apophyseal and it is not a redbird. sent7: the macintosh is not a Springfield if it is both a decay and not non-abaxial. sent8: if that the macintosh does wrong hold then the fact that the tramp does not invade NAD hold. sent9: the macintosh is a kind of a wrong that does invade dosimetry if there is something such that it does strengthen suiting. sent10: if the byssus is non-apophyseal thing that is not a redbird the dug is a redbird. sent11: if there is something such that it does not radicalize and/or it is not a Tamus the kennel is a kind of a Pulex. sent12: if something does not strengthen demotion or it is a kind of a Springfield or both the tramp is a Springfield. sent13: the byssus is unconquerable and is pentatonic. sent14: the milord is an ethyl but not abaxial. sent15: if something is unconquerable and it is pentatonic it is not an abolitionist. sent16: if the macintosh is a kind of a decay but it is non-abaxial then it is not a kind of a Springfield. sent17: something does not strengthen demotion and/or it is a Springfield if it is a kind of a redbird. sent18: the macintosh is not abaxial. sent19: the macintosh is both a decay and not abaxial. sent20: something is a Springfield and it is a wrong if it does not invade dosimetry. sent21: if the igloo is not an abolitionist then it is both apophyseal and a lunch. sent22: the igloo is not a kind of an abolitionist if it is a Pulex. ; $proof$ = | sent16 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the coca is not a Belisarius but it is a quasiparticle. | (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) | sent1: the coca is not a Belisarius if that it is not a cosmopolitan and does not invade horsemanship does not hold. sent2: the coca strengthens hindsight. sent3: the fact that the fact that the coca is not a cosmopolitan and does not invade horsemanship is not correct is not false. sent4: the fact that the coca is not reversible is not incorrect if that it is not a creep and not centrifugal is false. sent5: the coca is a key if it is a quasiparticle. sent6: the coca is a kind of a cosmopolitan if it is mandibulate. sent7: the observer is not a Belisarius. sent8: the fact that the absinth is not a Levant and it does not invade centurion is incorrect. sent9: if that the coca is not a kind of a Tahiti and it is not a kind of a Belisarius is false then it is not a lilangeni. sent10: the coca is a quasiparticle if it is a chon. sent11: the fact that the coca is not a quasiparticle but it does bark does not hold. sent12: the firetrap is a kind of a quasiparticle. sent13: if the highjacker invades Trondheim then it is a chon. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: {EP}{a} sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬(¬{AO}{a} & ¬{CL}{a}) -> ¬{DN}{a} sent5: {A}{a} -> {DL}{a} sent6: {DB}{a} -> {AA}{a} sent7: ¬{B}{de} sent8: ¬(¬{JC}{jk} & ¬{AE}{jk}) sent9: ¬(¬{FH}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{FP}{a} sent10: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} sent11: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {CA}{a}) sent12: {A}{ht} sent13: {GI}{jf} -> {C}{jf} | [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the coca is not a Belisarius.;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the coca is not a Belisarius but it is a quasiparticle. ; $context$ = sent1: the coca is not a Belisarius if that it is not a cosmopolitan and does not invade horsemanship does not hold. sent2: the coca strengthens hindsight. sent3: the fact that the fact that the coca is not a cosmopolitan and does not invade horsemanship is not correct is not false. sent4: the fact that the coca is not reversible is not incorrect if that it is not a creep and not centrifugal is false. sent5: the coca is a key if it is a quasiparticle. sent6: the coca is a kind of a cosmopolitan if it is mandibulate. sent7: the observer is not a Belisarius. sent8: the fact that the absinth is not a Levant and it does not invade centurion is incorrect. sent9: if that the coca is not a kind of a Tahiti and it is not a kind of a Belisarius is false then it is not a lilangeni. sent10: the coca is a quasiparticle if it is a chon. sent11: the fact that the coca is not a quasiparticle but it does bark does not hold. sent12: the firetrap is a kind of a quasiparticle. sent13: if the highjacker invades Trondheim then it is a chon. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the coca is not a Belisarius.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it is a sick and it is not a packet it does not strengthen gamebag is not correct. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is a bucksaw that is not morphophonemics it is vestmental. sent2: if something that is a sick is not a packet that it does not strengthen gamebag is not wrong. sent3: if the avadavat is a kind of sick thing that is a kind of a packet then it does not strengthen gamebag. sent4: something does strengthen gamebag if it is a sick and it is not a kind of a packet. | sent1: (Ex): ({GM}x & ¬{CL}x) -> {EK}x sent2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the avadavat does not strengthen gamebag if it is both sick and not a packet.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a sick and it is not a packet it does not strengthen gamebag is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a bucksaw that is not morphophonemics it is vestmental. sent2: if something that is a sick is not a packet that it does not strengthen gamebag is not wrong. sent3: if the avadavat is a kind of sick thing that is a kind of a packet then it does not strengthen gamebag. sent4: something does strengthen gamebag if it is a sick and it is not a kind of a packet. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the avadavat does not strengthen gamebag if it is both sick and not a packet.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if that it is a kind of unexcitable thing that is not pyrectic does not hold the fact that it does invade Terpsichore hold. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a dub that does not recumb then it is homiletics. sent2: if that the warrener is excitable is not incorrect then it does invade Terpsichore. sent3: if the fact that something is discourteous and not pyrectic is not right it chondrifies passionflower. sent4: the warrener does invade Terpsichore if the fact that it is not excitable and not pyrectic is wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is not non-perineal then that it does crest is true. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a monosaccharide and it is not congregational is not right then it does chondrify Charlotte. sent7: that the warrener does invade Terpsichore hold if it is unexcitable and it is not pyrectic. sent8: the warrener is a melancholic if it is paschal. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Nervi that does not strengthen unicorn is false it is Tasmanian. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not chondrify Charlotte then it is a dub. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not unexcitable then it does invade Terpsichore. sent12: the warrener does invade Terpsichore if that it is unexcitable thing that is pyrectic is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of unexcitable thing that is pyrectic does not hold then that it does invade Terpsichore is true. | sent1: (Ex): ({D}x & ¬{EG}x) -> {CS}x sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬({CH}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {JG}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): {AS}x -> {CG}x sent6: (Ex): ¬({IU}x & ¬{HI}x) -> {EK}x sent7: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: {BP}{aa} -> {GQ}{aa} sent9: (Ex): ¬({J}x & ¬{IF}x) -> {BK}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{EK}x -> {D}x sent11: (Ex): ¬{AA}x -> {B}x sent12: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent13: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the anterior chondrifies passionflower if that it is discourteous and it is not pyrectic is not right. | ¬({CH}{ad} & ¬{AB}{ad}) -> {JG}{ad} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a kind of unexcitable thing that is not pyrectic does not hold the fact that it does invade Terpsichore hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a dub that does not recumb then it is homiletics. sent2: if that the warrener is excitable is not incorrect then it does invade Terpsichore. sent3: if the fact that something is discourteous and not pyrectic is not right it chondrifies passionflower. sent4: the warrener does invade Terpsichore if the fact that it is not excitable and not pyrectic is wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is not non-perineal then that it does crest is true. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a monosaccharide and it is not congregational is not right then it does chondrify Charlotte. sent7: that the warrener does invade Terpsichore hold if it is unexcitable and it is not pyrectic. sent8: the warrener is a melancholic if it is paschal. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Nervi that does not strengthen unicorn is false it is Tasmanian. sent10: there exists something such that if it does not chondrify Charlotte then it is a dub. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not unexcitable then it does invade Terpsichore. sent12: the warrener does invade Terpsichore if that it is unexcitable thing that is pyrectic is wrong. sent13: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of unexcitable thing that is pyrectic does not hold then that it does invade Terpsichore is true. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Loestrin is sure. | {B}{b} | sent1: if the genius does strengthen Zambezi then the Loestrin is sure. sent2: if the Bannister is a kind of a rheometer it fuses compromising or it does not chondrify subdominant or both. sent3: that the fact that something is a leftism and is a tutu hold is not right if the fact that it does not strengthen Zambezi is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the escolar does fuse Hogarth and it is a kind of a subscriber is not true. | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: {F}{d} -> ({E}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({HM}x & {DT}x) sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it fuses Hogarth and is a subscriber is incorrect.;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x);"
]
| the Loestrin is not sure. | ¬{B}{b} | []
| 6 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Loestrin is sure. ; $context$ = sent1: if the genius does strengthen Zambezi then the Loestrin is sure. sent2: if the Bannister is a kind of a rheometer it fuses compromising or it does not chondrify subdominant or both. sent3: that the fact that something is a leftism and is a tutu hold is not right if the fact that it does not strengthen Zambezi is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the escolar does fuse Hogarth and it is a kind of a subscriber is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it fuses Hogarth and is a subscriber is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the gynobase does strengthen dodecagon. | {C}{b} | sent1: if the gynobase either chondrifies Pauling or is eusporangiate or both then the Yuma does not strengthen dodecagon. sent2: the Yuma is eusporangiate. sent3: that if the Yuma chondrifies Pauling the gynobase does not strengthen dodecagon is right. sent4: if the Yuma spends and it does strengthen dodecagon it is non-eusporangiate. sent5: the courser does chondrify Pauling. sent6: if the Yuma is eusporangiate and/or does chondrify Pauling then the gynobase does not strengthen dodecagon. | sent1: ({B}{b} v {A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent4: ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent5: {B}{r} sent6: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the Yuma is eusporangiate and/or chondrifies Pauling.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the moneran does not chondrify Pauling. | ¬{B}{bf} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the gynobase does strengthen dodecagon. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gynobase either chondrifies Pauling or is eusporangiate or both then the Yuma does not strengthen dodecagon. sent2: the Yuma is eusporangiate. sent3: that if the Yuma chondrifies Pauling the gynobase does not strengthen dodecagon is right. sent4: if the Yuma spends and it does strengthen dodecagon it is non-eusporangiate. sent5: the courser does chondrify Pauling. sent6: if the Yuma is eusporangiate and/or does chondrify Pauling then the gynobase does not strengthen dodecagon. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the Yuma is eusporangiate and/or chondrifies Pauling.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | not the chondrifying vanguard but the elopement happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: if that the chondrifying vanguard does not occur but the elopement happens is false the Romanceness does not occur. sent2: the Romanceness occurs. sent3: the harmlessness does not occur if that the invading Chlorococcum does not occur and the invading halfpenny occurs is false. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent2: {B} sent3: ¬(¬{BM} & {DO}) -> ¬{FH} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chondrifying vanguard does not occur but the elopement happens is incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Romance does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent1 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent2 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = not the chondrifying vanguard but the elopement happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the chondrifying vanguard does not occur but the elopement happens is false the Romanceness does not occur. sent2: the Romanceness occurs. sent3: the harmlessness does not occur if that the invading Chlorococcum does not occur and the invading halfpenny occurs is false. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the chondrifying vanguard does not occur but the elopement happens is incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Romance does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the flatterer is not a chimera. | ¬{E}{c} | sent1: the maxilla is cannibalistic. sent2: there is something such that it fuses semimonthly. sent3: if the jawfish does disturb and is not ineradicable the maxilla is meaningless. sent4: if there exists something such that it is meaningless then the fact that the maxilla fuses semimonthly and is ineradicable is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a chimera if the fact that it is a chimera and it does not disturb is incorrect. sent6: if the maxilla is meaningless the flatterer is a chimera. sent7: the jawfish does disturb and is not ineradicable if there is something such that it does fuse semimonthly. sent8: something is ineradicable and does fuse semimonthly if it does not disturb. sent9: the maxilla is not a chimera if it is cannibalistic. sent10: the heronry is meaningless. | sent1: {F}{b} sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{E}x sent6: {D}{b} -> {E}{c} sent7: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) sent9: {F}{b} -> ¬{E}{b} sent10: {D}{d} | [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the jawfish does disturb but it is not ineradicable.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the maxilla is meaningless.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: {D}{b}; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the flatterer is ineradicable. | {C}{c} | [
"sent8 -> int3: if the flatterer does not disturb it is ineradicable and fuses semimonthly.; sent9 & sent1 -> int4: the maxilla is not a chimera.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a chimera.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the flatterer is not a chimera. ; $context$ = sent1: the maxilla is cannibalistic. sent2: there is something such that it fuses semimonthly. sent3: if the jawfish does disturb and is not ineradicable the maxilla is meaningless. sent4: if there exists something such that it is meaningless then the fact that the maxilla fuses semimonthly and is ineradicable is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a chimera if the fact that it is a chimera and it does not disturb is incorrect. sent6: if the maxilla is meaningless the flatterer is a chimera. sent7: the jawfish does disturb and is not ineradicable if there is something such that it does fuse semimonthly. sent8: something is ineradicable and does fuse semimonthly if it does not disturb. sent9: the maxilla is not a chimera if it is cannibalistic. sent10: the heronry is meaningless. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the jawfish does disturb but it is not ineradicable.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the maxilla is meaningless.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if either it does not chondrify Timaliidae or it is not a primordium or both it is Korean. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: the destination is a kind of a Korean if it does not chondrify Timaliidae and/or it is not a kind of a primordium. | sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if either it does not chondrify Timaliidae or it is not a primordium or both it is Korean. ; $context$ = sent1: the destination is a kind of a Korean if it does not chondrify Timaliidae and/or it is not a kind of a primordium. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is a bornite and it does not strengthen vinegarroon it is androgenetic is wrong. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: if something that invades cyan does not strengthen ninetieth it does nosedive. sent2: if the onychophoran is a bornite but it does not strengthen vinegarroon then it is androgenetic. | sent1: (x): ({ET}x & ¬{EO}x) -> {FR}x sent2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if it does invade cyan and does not strengthen ninetieth it is a kind of a nosedive. | (Ex): ({ET}x & ¬{EO}x) -> {FR}x | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the claymore invades cyan and does not strengthen ninetieth then it is a nosedive.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a bornite and it does not strengthen vinegarroon it is androgenetic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that invades cyan does not strengthen ninetieth it does nosedive. sent2: if the onychophoran is a bornite but it does not strengthen vinegarroon then it is androgenetic. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pilus is not megakaryocytic. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the pilus is not transoceanic if the mediatrix is transoceanic and it is a going-over. sent2: if the fact that the idler is a kind of exergonic thing that is not a relative is not right the KBO is exergonic. sent3: if there is something such that it is an ethyl that the argil is non-doctrinal thing that does not chondrify antistrophe does not hold. sent4: the mediatrix is not megakaryocytic if there exists something such that it is a going-over. sent5: if the pilus is a historicism then it is megakaryocytic. sent6: the mediatrix is transoceanic. sent7: if something is a balsa then that it is exergonic thing that is not relative does not hold. sent8: the pilus is not a historicism if that the mediatrix is transoceanic but it is not a historicism is incorrect. sent9: the careerist is a going-over if there exists something such that the fact that it is not doctrinal and it does not chondrify antistrophe does not hold. sent10: the mediatrix does strengthen patty. sent11: if the KBO is exergonic it is an ethyl. sent12: if the mediatrix is transoceanic it is a historicism. sent13: if that the pilus is transoceanic is right then it is megakaryocytic. sent14: that everything is a balsa hold. sent15: the fact that the careerist is not doctrinal is correct if the fact that it is doctrinal and it does not chondrify antistrophe is not correct. sent16: something is an ethyl. | sent1: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent2: ¬({H}{f} & ¬{I}{f}) -> {H}{e} sent3: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬{A}{b} sent5: {B}{a} -> {A}{a} sent6: {C}{b} sent7: (x): {J}x -> ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) sent8: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}{c} sent10: {JF}{b} sent11: {H}{e} -> {G}{e} sent12: {C}{b} -> {B}{b} sent13: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} sent14: (x): {J}x sent15: ¬({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent16: (Ex): {G}x | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pilus is megakaryocytic.; sent12 & sent6 -> int1: the mediatrix is a historicism.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent12 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{b};"
]
| the pilus is megakaryocytic. | {A}{a} | []
| 7 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pilus is not megakaryocytic. ; $context$ = sent1: the pilus is not transoceanic if the mediatrix is transoceanic and it is a going-over. sent2: if the fact that the idler is a kind of exergonic thing that is not a relative is not right the KBO is exergonic. sent3: if there is something such that it is an ethyl that the argil is non-doctrinal thing that does not chondrify antistrophe does not hold. sent4: the mediatrix is not megakaryocytic if there exists something such that it is a going-over. sent5: if the pilus is a historicism then it is megakaryocytic. sent6: the mediatrix is transoceanic. sent7: if something is a balsa then that it is exergonic thing that is not relative does not hold. sent8: the pilus is not a historicism if that the mediatrix is transoceanic but it is not a historicism is incorrect. sent9: the careerist is a going-over if there exists something such that the fact that it is not doctrinal and it does not chondrify antistrophe does not hold. sent10: the mediatrix does strengthen patty. sent11: if the KBO is exergonic it is an ethyl. sent12: if the mediatrix is transoceanic it is a historicism. sent13: if that the pilus is transoceanic is right then it is megakaryocytic. sent14: that everything is a balsa hold. sent15: the fact that the careerist is not doctrinal is correct if the fact that it is doctrinal and it does not chondrify antistrophe is not correct. sent16: something is an ethyl. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pilus is megakaryocytic.; sent12 & sent6 -> int1: the mediatrix is a historicism.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the azoticness and the branching happens. | ({C} & {D}) | sent1: if the plummeting does not occur then that the azoticness and the branching happens is incorrect. sent2: the branching occurs. sent3: that the invading actinomycin occurs is right. sent4: the azoticness occurs if the fact that the plummeting occurs is true. sent5: the pushup happens. sent6: the fact that the plummeting does not occur if that the fact that the strengthening excommunication does not occur but the plummeting happens is wrong hold is correct. sent7: the plummeting or the strengthening excommunication or both happens. | sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent2: {D} sent3: {GG} sent4: {A} -> {C} sent5: {AG} sent6: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{A} sent7: ({A} v {B}) | []
| []
| that the fact that both the azoticness and the branching happens is true does not hold. | ¬({C} & {D}) | []
| 7 | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the azoticness and the branching happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plummeting does not occur then that the azoticness and the branching happens is incorrect. sent2: the branching occurs. sent3: that the invading actinomycin occurs is right. sent4: the azoticness occurs if the fact that the plummeting occurs is true. sent5: the pushup happens. sent6: the fact that the plummeting does not occur if that the fact that the strengthening excommunication does not occur but the plummeting happens is wrong hold is correct. sent7: the plummeting or the strengthening excommunication or both happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the gastrin does not invade dyne and is not conjunctival is not correct. | ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: the pearlite is not umbellate if the dagger is not shrinkable. sent2: that the gastrin does not invade dyne but it is conjunctival is not correct. sent3: that the gastrin does not invade dyne and is conjunctival is incorrect if that the bonnet is not conjunctival is right. sent4: that the gastrin does not invade dyne and it is not a frankincense is incorrect if the bonnet is not a frankincense. sent5: the fact that the gastrin does not invade dyne and it is not conjunctival is incorrect if the bonnet is not conjunctival. sent6: if the bonnet is a frankincense it does not invade dyne. sent7: if the gastrin is not a frankincense that the bonnet is not conjunctival and is not a kind of a frankincense does not hold. sent8: the bonnet is a frankincense. sent9: if the gastrin invades dyne then it is not a frankincense. sent10: the gastrin is not peaceable if it does invade Leptodactylidae. sent11: something swallows and it strengthens Arecidae if it is not umbellate. sent12: if something that is underage is Icelandic it is not shrinkable. sent13: the dagger is underage. sent14: if something is a frankincense it does not invade dyne. sent15: the bonnet does not invade dyne if it is conjunctival. sent16: the pizza does invade dyne if the gastrin does invade dyne. sent17: that the gastrin invades dyne but it is not conjunctival is not true if the bonnet is not conjunctival. sent18: that the gastrin invades dyne and is not conjunctival is not right. sent19: if the pearlite strengthens Arecidae then the gastrin is a kind of a frankincense. sent20: if the bonnet does invade dyne then it is not a frankincense. sent21: something is not conjunctival if it is a frankincense. sent22: something does not invade rumen if it is underage. | sent1: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬{F}{b} sent2: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent5: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: {A}{aa} -> ¬{D}{aa} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent8: {A}{aa} sent9: {D}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: {DG}{a} -> ¬{BM}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {B}x) sent12: (x): ({H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x sent13: {H}{c} sent14: (x): {A}x -> ¬{D}x sent15: {C}{aa} -> ¬{D}{aa} sent16: {D}{a} -> {D}{db} sent17: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent18: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent19: {B}{b} -> {A}{a} sent20: {D}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent21: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent22: (x): {H}x -> ¬{DD}x | [
"sent21 -> int1: if the bonnet is a kind of a frankincense then it is not conjunctival.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the bonnet is not conjunctival.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent21 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; int1 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{C}{aa}; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the gastrin does not invade dyne and it is not conjunctival. | (¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent11 -> int3: the pearlite is a swallow and it does strengthen Arecidae if it is not umbellate.; sent12 -> int4: the dagger is not shrinkable if it is underage and it is a Icelandic.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the gastrin does not invade dyne and is not conjunctival is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the pearlite is not umbellate if the dagger is not shrinkable. sent2: that the gastrin does not invade dyne but it is conjunctival is not correct. sent3: that the gastrin does not invade dyne and is conjunctival is incorrect if that the bonnet is not conjunctival is right. sent4: that the gastrin does not invade dyne and it is not a frankincense is incorrect if the bonnet is not a frankincense. sent5: the fact that the gastrin does not invade dyne and it is not conjunctival is incorrect if the bonnet is not conjunctival. sent6: if the bonnet is a frankincense it does not invade dyne. sent7: if the gastrin is not a frankincense that the bonnet is not conjunctival and is not a kind of a frankincense does not hold. sent8: the bonnet is a frankincense. sent9: if the gastrin invades dyne then it is not a frankincense. sent10: the gastrin is not peaceable if it does invade Leptodactylidae. sent11: something swallows and it strengthens Arecidae if it is not umbellate. sent12: if something that is underage is Icelandic it is not shrinkable. sent13: the dagger is underage. sent14: if something is a frankincense it does not invade dyne. sent15: the bonnet does not invade dyne if it is conjunctival. sent16: the pizza does invade dyne if the gastrin does invade dyne. sent17: that the gastrin invades dyne but it is not conjunctival is not true if the bonnet is not conjunctival. sent18: that the gastrin invades dyne and is not conjunctival is not right. sent19: if the pearlite strengthens Arecidae then the gastrin is a kind of a frankincense. sent20: if the bonnet does invade dyne then it is not a frankincense. sent21: something is not conjunctival if it is a frankincense. sent22: something does not invade rumen if it is underage. ; $proof$ = | sent21 -> int1: if the bonnet is a kind of a frankincense then it is not conjunctival.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the bonnet is not conjunctival.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the lagerphone buzzes and does not strengthen cellblock. | ({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | sent1: that the lagerphone is a buzz and does strengthen cellblock does not hold. sent2: if that the fact that something is a ineligibility but it does not strengthen distressing is true is not right then it invades commandment. sent3: the fact that either the iron is a map or it does not hoot or both is incorrect. sent4: the iron is not a Butte if it is not a Butte or is Beethovenian or both. sent5: the iron is not a buzz if the fact that it is a map or it is not a kind of a hoot or both is not true. sent6: if the Toda does not strengthen titillation and it is not Beethovenian then the acquirer is Beethovenian. sent7: the lagerphone is a kind of a bondage if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Butte. sent8: the Harpy is not a map. sent9: if the Toda does invade ten then it is hexangular. sent10: the Toda invades ten. sent11: the fact that the iron is a hoot but it is not a kind of a buzz is not right if the lagerphone does not hoot. sent12: the aerobe is a grandiosity. sent13: the iron is not a kind of a map. sent14: if the iron is not a buzz then the fact that the lagerphone is a buzz that does not strengthen cellblock is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the lagerphone is a buzz and it strengthens cellblock is not true if the iron is not a buzz. sent16: the spinet does not strengthen manned if the aerobe is a grandiosity and stomatous. sent17: if something is a bondage that does invade commandment then that it insures is not correct. sent18: the fact that the lagerphone is a ineligibility and does not strengthen distressing is not true if that the spinet does not strengthen manned is not wrong. sent19: if something is Beethovenian then the iron is not a Butte or is Beethovenian or both. sent20: something is a buzz but it does not strengthen cellblock if it does not insure. sent21: something does not strengthen titillation and it is not Beethovenian if it is hexangular. sent22: if the fact that the iron is a bondage but it does not invade commandment does not hold the lagerphone does not insure. sent23: if that the lagerphone buzzes and/or it does not hoot is wrong it does not strengthen cellblock. | sent1: ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {E}x sent3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: (¬{F}{a} v {K}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent5: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent6: (¬{M}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> {K}{e} sent7: (x): ¬{F}x -> {D}{b} sent8: ¬{AA}{aa} sent9: {O}{f} -> {N}{f} sent10: {O}{f} sent11: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent12: {L}{d} sent13: ¬{AA}{a} sent14: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent15: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent16: ({L}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{I}{c} sent17: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent18: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent19: (x): {K}x -> (¬{F}{a} v {K}{a}) sent20: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) sent21: (x): {N}x -> (¬{M}x & ¬{K}x) sent22: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent23: ¬({B}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the iron is not a buzz.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the lagerphone is a buzz and does not strengthen cellblock. | ({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | [
"sent20 -> int2: the lagerphone is a buzz and does not strengthen cellblock if it does not insure.; sent17 -> int3: the lagerphone does not insure if it is a bondage and invades commandment.; sent21 -> int4: if the Toda is hexangular it does not strengthen titillation and it is not Beethovenian.; sent9 & sent10 -> int5: the Toda is hexangular.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Toda does not strengthen titillation and is not Beethovenian.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the acquirer is Beethovenian.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is Beethovenian.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: either the iron is not a Butte or it is Beethovenian or both.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the iron is not a kind of a Butte.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is not a Butte.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the lagerphone is a kind of a bondage.; sent2 -> int13: the lagerphone does invade commandment if the fact that it is a ineligibility and it does not strengthen distressing is false.;"
]
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the lagerphone buzzes and does not strengthen cellblock. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lagerphone is a buzz and does strengthen cellblock does not hold. sent2: if that the fact that something is a ineligibility but it does not strengthen distressing is true is not right then it invades commandment. sent3: the fact that either the iron is a map or it does not hoot or both is incorrect. sent4: the iron is not a Butte if it is not a Butte or is Beethovenian or both. sent5: the iron is not a buzz if the fact that it is a map or it is not a kind of a hoot or both is not true. sent6: if the Toda does not strengthen titillation and it is not Beethovenian then the acquirer is Beethovenian. sent7: the lagerphone is a kind of a bondage if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Butte. sent8: the Harpy is not a map. sent9: if the Toda does invade ten then it is hexangular. sent10: the Toda invades ten. sent11: the fact that the iron is a hoot but it is not a kind of a buzz is not right if the lagerphone does not hoot. sent12: the aerobe is a grandiosity. sent13: the iron is not a kind of a map. sent14: if the iron is not a buzz then the fact that the lagerphone is a buzz that does not strengthen cellblock is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the lagerphone is a buzz and it strengthens cellblock is not true if the iron is not a buzz. sent16: the spinet does not strengthen manned if the aerobe is a grandiosity and stomatous. sent17: if something is a bondage that does invade commandment then that it insures is not correct. sent18: the fact that the lagerphone is a ineligibility and does not strengthen distressing is not true if that the spinet does not strengthen manned is not wrong. sent19: if something is Beethovenian then the iron is not a Butte or is Beethovenian or both. sent20: something is a buzz but it does not strengthen cellblock if it does not insure. sent21: something does not strengthen titillation and it is not Beethovenian if it is hexangular. sent22: if the fact that the iron is a bondage but it does not invade commandment does not hold the lagerphone does not insure. sent23: if that the lagerphone buzzes and/or it does not hoot is wrong it does not strengthen cellblock. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the iron is not a buzz.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the tincture is a kind of a panache. | {E}{b} | sent1: if the luciferin chondrifies mutter the tincture is a panache. sent2: the fact that the tinkerer is a Mozambican if that the tincture is Mozambican but it is not a kind of a pension is not correct is not false. sent3: if something is acervate then it is epidemic and it is not seedy. sent4: that something is a Fergon but it does not pension is incorrect if it does not chondrify hydrosphere. sent5: if something does invade tincture it does chondrify mutter. sent6: if something is not seedy the fact that it does chondrify hydrosphere and it does chamber is not right. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a anagnost is true. sent8: something is lossless and/or it does not invade tincture if it does not chondrify mutter. sent9: if that the hedonist does chondrify hydrosphere and is a chamber is wrong then the hatmaker does not chondrify hydrosphere. sent10: if that there is something such that it is a anagnost is not wrong the luciferin is lossless. sent11: the luciferin is lossless. sent12: something is not a kind of a anagnost if it is lossless or it does not invade tincture or both. sent13: the fact that the cutlassfish is sculptural is not incorrect. sent14: if something is a panache it invades tincture. sent15: the hedonist is not seedy if the cutlassfish is epidemic but it is not seedy. sent16: if the luciferin is not a panache the tincture is not a kind of a panache. sent17: if the cutlassfish is sculptural then it is not non-acervate. sent18: the fact that the tincture is not a anagnost and is not lossless is wrong if it does not invade tincture. | sent1: {D}{a} -> {E}{b} sent2: ¬({DF}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> {DF}{fi} sent3: (x): {K}x -> ({L}x & ¬{J}x) sent4: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent5: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({H}x & {I}x) sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x v ¬{C}x) sent9: ¬({H}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent10: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent11: {B}{a} sent12: (x): ({B}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent13: {M}{e} sent14: (x): {E}x -> {C}x sent15: ({L}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} sent16: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬{E}{b} sent17: {M}{e} -> {K}{e} sent18: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"sent5 -> int1: if the luciferin does invade tincture it chondrifies mutter.;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: {C}{a} -> {D}{a};"
]
| the tincture is not a panache. | ¬{E}{b} | [
"sent12 -> int2: the luciferin is not a kind of a anagnost if it is lossless or it does not invade tincture or both.; sent8 -> int3: if the luciferin does not chondrify mutter it is lossless and/or does not invade tincture.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the hatmaker is a Fergon but not a pension does not hold if it does not chondrify hydrosphere.; sent6 -> int5: the fact that that the hedonist chondrifies hydrosphere and is a kind of a chamber is not correct hold if that it is not seedy is not wrong.; sent3 -> int6: if the cutlassfish is acervate then it is epidemic thing that is not seedy.; sent17 & sent13 -> int7: the cutlassfish is acervate.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cutlassfish is epidemic thing that is not seedy.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the hedonist is not seedy.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the hedonist chondrifies hydrosphere and chambers is false.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the hatmaker does not chondrify hydrosphere.; int4 & int11 -> int12: that the hatmaker is a kind of a Fergon that does not pension is not true.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is a Fergon and it is not a pension is incorrect.;"
]
| 12 | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the tincture is a kind of a panache. ; $context$ = sent1: if the luciferin chondrifies mutter the tincture is a panache. sent2: the fact that the tinkerer is a Mozambican if that the tincture is Mozambican but it is not a kind of a pension is not correct is not false. sent3: if something is acervate then it is epidemic and it is not seedy. sent4: that something is a Fergon but it does not pension is incorrect if it does not chondrify hydrosphere. sent5: if something does invade tincture it does chondrify mutter. sent6: if something is not seedy the fact that it does chondrify hydrosphere and it does chamber is not right. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a anagnost is true. sent8: something is lossless and/or it does not invade tincture if it does not chondrify mutter. sent9: if that the hedonist does chondrify hydrosphere and is a chamber is wrong then the hatmaker does not chondrify hydrosphere. sent10: if that there is something such that it is a anagnost is not wrong the luciferin is lossless. sent11: the luciferin is lossless. sent12: something is not a kind of a anagnost if it is lossless or it does not invade tincture or both. sent13: the fact that the cutlassfish is sculptural is not incorrect. sent14: if something is a panache it invades tincture. sent15: the hedonist is not seedy if the cutlassfish is epidemic but it is not seedy. sent16: if the luciferin is not a panache the tincture is not a kind of a panache. sent17: if the cutlassfish is sculptural then it is not non-acervate. sent18: the fact that the tincture is not a anagnost and is not lossless is wrong if it does not invade tincture. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: if the luciferin does invade tincture it chondrifies mutter.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the umber is incongruent but it is not a kind of a zoster is wrong. | ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | sent1: the student is not monotheistic but it is incongruent if there is something such that it is not a zoster. sent2: something does not strengthen student. sent3: the umber is not obvious but a gravy. sent4: the umber is incongruent if there is something such that it is not a zoster. sent5: the fact that the umber is a kind of a cytochrome if something is not connotative is true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cytochrome. sent7: there is something such that it is not wintry. sent8: the umber is a Porphyrio but it is not a Savoy. sent9: there exists something such that it is not monotheistic. sent10: there exists something such that it is a zoster. sent11: if there is something such that it is not monotheistic the student pans. sent12: there exists something such that it is not incongruent. sent13: the umber is not energetic. sent14: the student is a zoster but it does not pan if the umber is not incongruent. sent15: the student is not monotheistic but it pans if something is not a cytochrome. sent16: the umber is incongruent but it is not a zoster if the student is not monotheistic. sent17: the umber does not pan if the student is not incongruent. sent18: if something is not a cytochrome the fact that it is not congruent and it is not a zoster does not hold. sent19: the student is not a kind of a Orff. sent20: the umber is not monotheistic and quietens. sent21: there is something such that it is a buckskins. | sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{AK}x sent3: (¬{GL}{b} & {BQ}{b}) sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{BK}x -> {A}{b} sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: (Ex): ¬{EB}x sent8: ({HK}{b} & ¬{DF}{b}) sent9: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent10: (Ex): {E}x sent11: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}{a} sent12: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent13: ¬{CM}{b} sent14: ¬{D}{b} -> ({E}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent16: ¬{B}{a} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent17: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent18: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent19: ¬{DD}{a} sent20: (¬{B}{b} & {I}{b}) sent21: (Ex): {CH}x | [
"sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the student is not monotheistic but it is a pan.; int1 -> int2: the student is not monotheistic.; sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 & sent15 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the umber is both incongruent and not a zoster is false. | ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | [
"sent18 -> int3: if that the umber is not a kind of a cytochrome is not wrong the fact that it is incongruent and it is not a kind of a zoster is incorrect.;"
]
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the umber is incongruent but it is not a kind of a zoster is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the student is not monotheistic but it is incongruent if there is something such that it is not a zoster. sent2: something does not strengthen student. sent3: the umber is not obvious but a gravy. sent4: the umber is incongruent if there is something such that it is not a zoster. sent5: the fact that the umber is a kind of a cytochrome if something is not connotative is true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cytochrome. sent7: there is something such that it is not wintry. sent8: the umber is a Porphyrio but it is not a Savoy. sent9: there exists something such that it is not monotheistic. sent10: there exists something such that it is a zoster. sent11: if there is something such that it is not monotheistic the student pans. sent12: there exists something such that it is not incongruent. sent13: the umber is not energetic. sent14: the student is a zoster but it does not pan if the umber is not incongruent. sent15: the student is not monotheistic but it pans if something is not a cytochrome. sent16: the umber is incongruent but it is not a zoster if the student is not monotheistic. sent17: the umber does not pan if the student is not incongruent. sent18: if something is not a cytochrome the fact that it is not congruent and it is not a zoster does not hold. sent19: the student is not a kind of a Orff. sent20: the umber is not monotheistic and quietens. sent21: there is something such that it is a buckskins. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent15 -> int1: the student is not monotheistic but it is a pan.; int1 -> int2: the student is not monotheistic.; sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is Soviet and does not recede does not hold then it is not a Brya is wrong. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if that it is ethnological and it does not chondrify cangue is not true then it is a Bohemian. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a anagnost that is a brush-off does not hold then it is not short-order. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a mummification that is not a kind of a fiberscope then it is not a kind of an heir. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a kind of Amharic thing that does chondrify runt does not hold the fact that it is not a Logrono is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is a fiberscope it is not a kind of a Logrono. sent6: the astrodome is not a Brya if the fact that it is Soviet and it does not recede does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a asphyxia and it is not Congregational is not true then it is not a kind of an invocation. sent8: if the astrodome does recede then it is not amphitropous. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({CC}x & ¬{F}x) -> {GA}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({BR}x & {EJ}x) -> ¬{G}x sent3: (Ex): ({HG}x & ¬{DS}x) -> ¬{IT}x sent4: (Ex): ¬({AM}x & {JG}x) -> ¬{AR}x sent5: (Ex): {DS}x -> ¬{AR}x sent6: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ¬({GS}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{GC}x sent8: {AB}{aa} -> ¬{HH}{aa} | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is Soviet and does not recede does not hold then it is not a Brya is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is ethnological and it does not chondrify cangue is not true then it is a Bohemian. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a anagnost that is a brush-off does not hold then it is not short-order. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a mummification that is not a kind of a fiberscope then it is not a kind of an heir. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a kind of Amharic thing that does chondrify runt does not hold the fact that it is not a Logrono is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is a fiberscope it is not a kind of a Logrono. sent6: the astrodome is not a Brya if the fact that it is Soviet and it does not recede does not hold. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a asphyxia and it is not Congregational is not true then it is not a kind of an invocation. sent8: if the astrodome does recede then it is not amphitropous. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an ion then it chondrifies refutation and is not comprehensible is not right. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an ion hold it is incomprehensible. sent2: something is extrasystolic and does bury if it is not a kind of a avulsion. sent3: the Irish is a phaeton that does chondrify refutation if it is impartial. sent4: the dollhouse is incomprehensible if it is not an ion. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an ion that it does chondrify refutation and it is incomprehensible is true. sent6: the dollhouse chondrifies refutation and is incomprehensible if it is not an ion. sent7: something buries and it is nonlinguistic if it does not invade pique. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent2: (x): ¬{AG}x -> ({EU}x & {JE}x) sent3: {CP}{hc} -> ({JH}{hc} & {AA}{hc}) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent5: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{AI}x -> ({JE}x & {HQ}x) | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if it does not invade pique that it buries and it is nonlinguistic is true. | (Ex): ¬{AI}x -> ({JE}x & {HQ}x) | [
"sent7 -> int1: the subcompact does bury and it is nonlinguistic if it does not invade pique.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an ion then it chondrifies refutation and is not comprehensible is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an ion hold it is incomprehensible. sent2: something is extrasystolic and does bury if it is not a kind of a avulsion. sent3: the Irish is a phaeton that does chondrify refutation if it is impartial. sent4: the dollhouse is incomprehensible if it is not an ion. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an ion that it does chondrify refutation and it is incomprehensible is true. sent6: the dollhouse chondrifies refutation and is incomprehensible if it is not an ion. sent7: something buries and it is nonlinguistic if it does not invade pique. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the aurifying and the retiring happens. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: if the inverting and the parallax occurs then the strengthening Mohawk does not occur. sent2: the psyop does not occur and the greaterness does not occur if the hammerlock does not occur. sent3: the parallax occurs if the strengthening Acnidosporidia occurs. sent4: the fusing dosimetry occurs. sent5: the educationalness occurs. sent6: if the cogitating happens the hammerlock does not occur. sent7: the strengthening Acnidosporidia happens if the horticulturalness occurs. sent8: that the strengthening Mohawk but not the aurifying happens triggers that the illicitness occurs. sent9: if that the fact that the paroxysmalness does not occur and the horticulturalness does not occur is correct is incorrect the horticulturalness happens. sent10: the retiring occurs. sent11: that the paroxysmalness does not occur and the horticulturalness does not occur is incorrect if the stylization occurs. sent12: that the aurifying and the retiring occurs is not right if the strengthening Mohawk does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the strengthening Acnidosporidia does not occur is right the inverting but not the parallax happens. sent14: the inverting and the timing occurs if the psyop does not occur. sent15: the cogitating happens. sent16: the aurifying occurs and the strengthening Mohawk happens. | sent1: ({D} & {E}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬{K} -> (¬{H} & ¬{J}) sent3: {F} -> {E} sent4: {FG} sent5: {EF} sent6: {P} -> ¬{K} sent7: {I} -> {F} sent8: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> {ED} sent9: ¬(¬{L} & ¬{I}) -> {I} sent10: {C} sent11: {M} -> ¬(¬{L} & ¬{I}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) sent13: ¬{F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) sent14: ¬{H} -> ({D} & {G}) sent15: {P} sent16: ({A} & {B}) | [
"sent16 -> int1: the aurifying occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> int1: {A}; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that both the aurifying and the retiring happens is false. | ¬({A} & {C}) | [
"sent6 & sent15 -> int2: the hammerlock does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the psyop does not occur and the greaterness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the psyop does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: both the inverting and the timing happens.; int5 -> int6: the inverting occurs.;"
]
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the aurifying and the retiring happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inverting and the parallax occurs then the strengthening Mohawk does not occur. sent2: the psyop does not occur and the greaterness does not occur if the hammerlock does not occur. sent3: the parallax occurs if the strengthening Acnidosporidia occurs. sent4: the fusing dosimetry occurs. sent5: the educationalness occurs. sent6: if the cogitating happens the hammerlock does not occur. sent7: the strengthening Acnidosporidia happens if the horticulturalness occurs. sent8: that the strengthening Mohawk but not the aurifying happens triggers that the illicitness occurs. sent9: if that the fact that the paroxysmalness does not occur and the horticulturalness does not occur is correct is incorrect the horticulturalness happens. sent10: the retiring occurs. sent11: that the paroxysmalness does not occur and the horticulturalness does not occur is incorrect if the stylization occurs. sent12: that the aurifying and the retiring occurs is not right if the strengthening Mohawk does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the strengthening Acnidosporidia does not occur is right the inverting but not the parallax happens. sent14: the inverting and the timing occurs if the psyop does not occur. sent15: the cogitating happens. sent16: the aurifying occurs and the strengthening Mohawk happens. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: the aurifying occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the cockatoo is ametabolic hold. | {A}{a} | sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is Teutonic a logicality is not correct. sent2: there is something such that it is Teutonic and is a logicality. sent3: the cockatoo is necessary. sent4: the cockatoo is a logicality. sent5: if something is not ametabolic the cockatoo is a Guarnerius. sent6: the cockatoo is ametabolic if there is something such that that it is Teutonic a logicality is false. sent7: the firetrap is a logicality if the cockatoo is a logicality. sent8: the cockatoo is Teutonic. sent9: the empiricist is a Lebanon if the fact that it is not a Lebanon and it is not dactylic is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not Teutonic then the cockatoo is ametabolic. sent11: there exists something such that that it does tick and it is virile is true. sent12: if something is not Teutonic the meltdown demonstrates. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not printable then the cockatoo fuses admiral. sent14: there is something such that that it is conjunctive and it is packable is incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not Teutonic the cockatoo is quadrangular. sent16: the immigrant is a logicality. sent17: the cockatoo calcines if there is something such that that it is both a growler and a logicality is not right. sent18: the cockatoo is not ametabolic if the adjutant is non-iconic thing that is not ametabolic. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: {CU}{a} sent4: {AB}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> {BD}{a} sent6: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent7: {AB}{a} -> {AB}{da} sent8: {AA}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {C}{c} sent10: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}{a} sent11: (Ex): ({EP}x & {FB}x) sent12: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {HK}{bs} sent13: (x): ¬{BI}x -> {BQ}{a} sent14: (Ex): ¬({EE}x & {EL}x) sent15: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {JH}{a} sent16: {AB}{co} sent17: (x): ¬({FI}x & {AB}x) -> {T}{a} sent18: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the firetrap is a logicality. | {AB}{da} | []
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the cockatoo is ametabolic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is Teutonic a logicality is not correct. sent2: there is something such that it is Teutonic and is a logicality. sent3: the cockatoo is necessary. sent4: the cockatoo is a logicality. sent5: if something is not ametabolic the cockatoo is a Guarnerius. sent6: the cockatoo is ametabolic if there is something such that that it is Teutonic a logicality is false. sent7: the firetrap is a logicality if the cockatoo is a logicality. sent8: the cockatoo is Teutonic. sent9: the empiricist is a Lebanon if the fact that it is not a Lebanon and it is not dactylic is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not Teutonic then the cockatoo is ametabolic. sent11: there exists something such that that it does tick and it is virile is true. sent12: if something is not Teutonic the meltdown demonstrates. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not printable then the cockatoo fuses admiral. sent14: there is something such that that it is conjunctive and it is packable is incorrect. sent15: if there is something such that it is not Teutonic the cockatoo is quadrangular. sent16: the immigrant is a logicality. sent17: the cockatoo calcines if there is something such that that it is both a growler and a logicality is not right. sent18: the cockatoo is not ametabolic if the adjutant is non-iconic thing that is not ametabolic. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the celebrant does bifurcate. | {C}{a} | sent1: the fact that the beebread is leaky hold. sent2: the beebread does invade Tell but it does not strengthen homeless. sent3: the fact that the celebrant does not bifurcate hold if the beebread is a kind of a copula that does not chondrify celebrant. sent4: the facade does bifurcate if the spoor is not a kind of a copula and chondrifies celebrant. sent5: the celebrant does bifurcate if the facade bifurcate. sent6: everything is a copula. sent7: if the beebread is leaky it does not chondrify celebrant. sent8: if the spoor is not leaky it is not a copula and it does chondrify celebrant. sent9: the celebrant does chondrify Malto but it is not a kind of a jubilee. | sent1: {D}{aa} sent2: ({L}{aa} & ¬{DL}{aa}) sent3: ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent4: (¬{A}{c} & {B}{c}) -> {C}{b} sent5: {C}{b} -> {C}{a} sent6: (x): {A}x sent7: {D}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent8: ¬{D}{c} -> (¬{A}{c} & {B}{c}) sent9: ({FT}{a} & ¬{HE}{a}) | [
"sent6 -> int1: the beebread is a copula.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the beebread does not chondrify celebrant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the beebread is a kind of a copula that does not chondrify celebrant.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{B}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}); int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the celebrant bifurcates. | {C}{a} | []
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the celebrant does bifurcate. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the beebread is leaky hold. sent2: the beebread does invade Tell but it does not strengthen homeless. sent3: the fact that the celebrant does not bifurcate hold if the beebread is a kind of a copula that does not chondrify celebrant. sent4: the facade does bifurcate if the spoor is not a kind of a copula and chondrifies celebrant. sent5: the celebrant does bifurcate if the facade bifurcate. sent6: everything is a copula. sent7: if the beebread is leaky it does not chondrify celebrant. sent8: if the spoor is not leaky it is not a copula and it does chondrify celebrant. sent9: the celebrant does chondrify Malto but it is not a kind of a jubilee. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: the beebread is a copula.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the beebread does not chondrify celebrant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the beebread is a kind of a copula that does not chondrify celebrant.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the necromancer is not phonetic. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: there exists something such that it is not a chain. sent2: if there is something such that it is not phonetic then the fact that the necromancer is not a kind of a congestion and it is not a blubber is incorrect. sent3: if that the filefish is not a blubber and it is not phonetic is not correct the necromancer is not a congestion. sent4: the filefish is not a kind of a blubber if the fact that the necromancer is not phonetic and not a congestion is not true. sent5: the filefish is not phonetic if the necromancer is a congestion. sent6: the filefish is not phonetic. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the filefish is not a kind of a congestion and it is not a blubber is incorrect then the necromancer is not phonetic is not wrong. sent8: that the filefish is a kind of phonetic thing that does not strengthen Rask is not true. sent9: that the filefish is not a congestion but it is a blubber is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the filefish is not a congestion and not a blubber does not hold if there is something such that it does not chain. sent11: the filefish is not phonetic if that the necromancer is not a blubber and not a congestion does not hold. sent12: that the necromancer is a kind of non-phonetic thing that is not a congestion does not hold if there is something such that that it is not a blubber is not wrong. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent3: ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent4: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: {B}{b} -> ¬{D}{a} sent6: ¬{D}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent8: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{FM}{a}) sent9: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent11: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the filefish is not a congestion and it is not a blubber is right is not right.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the necromancer is not phonetic. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a chain. sent2: if there is something such that it is not phonetic then the fact that the necromancer is not a kind of a congestion and it is not a blubber is incorrect. sent3: if that the filefish is not a blubber and it is not phonetic is not correct the necromancer is not a congestion. sent4: the filefish is not a kind of a blubber if the fact that the necromancer is not phonetic and not a congestion is not true. sent5: the filefish is not phonetic if the necromancer is a congestion. sent6: the filefish is not phonetic. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the filefish is not a kind of a congestion and it is not a blubber is incorrect then the necromancer is not phonetic is not wrong. sent8: that the filefish is a kind of phonetic thing that does not strengthen Rask is not true. sent9: that the filefish is not a congestion but it is a blubber is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the filefish is not a congestion and not a blubber does not hold if there is something such that it does not chain. sent11: the filefish is not phonetic if that the necromancer is not a blubber and not a congestion does not hold. sent12: that the necromancer is a kind of non-phonetic thing that is not a congestion does not hold if there is something such that that it is not a blubber is not wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the filefish is not a congestion and it is not a blubber is right is not right.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it does man and it does not invade greeter then it does not fuse lilting does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: something that is a kind of a manned that is not a calcimine is not a kind of a roselle. sent2: if the hobbyhorse revenges but it is not a kind of a Merovingian then it is not a Gwydion. sent3: there is something such that if it does man and it invades greeter it does not fuse lilting. sent4: the hobbyhorse is not a kind of a debut if it is not scientific and it is not a epicardia. sent5: that the hobbyhorse is not cerebellar hold if it does cozen and does not invade greeter. sent6: there is something such that if it is a manned and it does not invade greeter then it fuses lilting. sent7: the fact that if the hobbyhorse invades greeter and does not strengthen sulky the hobbyhorse is not infantile is not false. sent8: if the hobbyhorse is a manned but it does not invade greeter then it does fuse lilting. sent9: the hobbyhorse does not fuse lilting if it is a manned that does not invade greeter. sent10: there exists something such that if it is associative and does not chondrify archidiaconate it is not a perpendicular. sent11: if the hobbyhorse revenges and is not a roselle then it does not fuse lilting. sent12: if the fetoscope fuses lilting but it is not cationic that it is not a firestorm is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Necturus that is not visible is true then it is not a togetherness. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it lets and it does not chondrify echinocactus is true then it does not blur. sent15: if the hobbyhorse invades greeter and is not muscular it is not autodidactic. sent16: there exists something such that if it strengthens breechcloth and does not chondrify drugget it does not invade Avestan. sent17: if the hobbyhorse does man and it invades greeter the fact that it does not fuse lilting is not false. sent18: that the hobbyhorse does not invade carton is not wrong if it chondrifies diary and does not chondrify sugariness. | sent1: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{CP}x) -> ¬{EU}x sent2: ({JJ}{aa} & ¬{AN}{aa}) -> ¬{FJ}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: ({DQ}{aa} & ¬{AQ}{aa}) -> ¬{BK}{aa} sent5: ({BG}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{FP}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent7: ({AB}{aa} & ¬{CC}{aa}) -> ¬{HT}{aa} sent8: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({AL}x & ¬{CQ}x) -> ¬{EH}x sent11: ({JJ}{aa} & ¬{EU}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent12: ({B}{ej} & ¬{CO}{ej}) -> ¬{IP}{ej} sent13: (Ex): ({IC}x & ¬{IB}x) -> ¬{BD}x sent14: (Ex): ({JE}x & ¬{ER}x) -> ¬{BA}x sent15: ({AB}{aa} & ¬{EF}{aa}) -> ¬{AT}{aa} sent16: (Ex): ({CU}x & ¬{II}x) -> ¬{EK}x sent17: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent18: ({AE}{aa} & ¬{GD}{aa}) -> ¬{DE}{aa} | [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| if the avadavat is a kind of a manned but it is not a kind of a calcimine then it is not a roselle. | ({AA}{bu} & ¬{CP}{bu}) -> ¬{EU}{bu} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does man and it does not invade greeter then it does not fuse lilting does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a kind of a manned that is not a calcimine is not a kind of a roselle. sent2: if the hobbyhorse revenges but it is not a kind of a Merovingian then it is not a Gwydion. sent3: there is something such that if it does man and it invades greeter it does not fuse lilting. sent4: the hobbyhorse is not a kind of a debut if it is not scientific and it is not a epicardia. sent5: that the hobbyhorse is not cerebellar hold if it does cozen and does not invade greeter. sent6: there is something such that if it is a manned and it does not invade greeter then it fuses lilting. sent7: the fact that if the hobbyhorse invades greeter and does not strengthen sulky the hobbyhorse is not infantile is not false. sent8: if the hobbyhorse is a manned but it does not invade greeter then it does fuse lilting. sent9: the hobbyhorse does not fuse lilting if it is a manned that does not invade greeter. sent10: there exists something such that if it is associative and does not chondrify archidiaconate it is not a perpendicular. sent11: if the hobbyhorse revenges and is not a roselle then it does not fuse lilting. sent12: if the fetoscope fuses lilting but it is not cationic that it is not a firestorm is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Necturus that is not visible is true then it is not a togetherness. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it lets and it does not chondrify echinocactus is true then it does not blur. sent15: if the hobbyhorse invades greeter and is not muscular it is not autodidactic. sent16: there exists something such that if it strengthens breechcloth and does not chondrify drugget it does not invade Avestan. sent17: if the hobbyhorse does man and it invades greeter the fact that it does not fuse lilting is not false. sent18: that the hobbyhorse does not invade carton is not wrong if it chondrifies diary and does not chondrify sugariness. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the Shaker is not a buckskins is true. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: if the fact that the dicot is pictorial is not false the monsoon is not a pictorial. sent2: the South invades monsoon if there is something such that that it does not invades monsoon and is esoteric does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is Gaussian then the Shaker is not polymorphous but it is totalitarian. sent4: the serranid is aroid and invades altoist. sent5: if the defibrillator is not a kind of a searchlight the Cabernet is not a top and it is not a pyrogallol. sent6: the dicot is pictorial. sent7: if the monsoon is not a kind of a pictorial that it does not invade monsoon and is esoteric is not true. sent8: the defibrillator is not a searchlight if that there is something such that it does invade monsoon hold. sent9: everything is Cockney thing that is aroid. sent10: the Shaker is a kind of aroid thing that is a buckskins. sent11: the Cabernet is Gaussian if it is not a top and it is not a kind of a pyrogallol. sent12: that something is both not a totalitarian and not aroid is not right if the fact that it is polymorphous is not false. sent13: the Chapman is a buckskins if there is something such that it is not polymorphous and is a kind of a totalitarian. sent14: the Shaker is aroid. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is Gaussian and is a pyrogallol. | sent1: {J}{f} -> ¬{J}{e} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {K}x) -> {I}{d} sent3: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ({A}{bn} & {ET}{bn}) sent5: ¬{H}{c} -> (¬{G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent6: {J}{f} sent7: ¬{J}{e} -> ¬(¬{I}{e} & {K}{e}) sent8: (x): {I}x -> ¬{H}{c} sent9: (x): ({CE}x & {A}x) sent10: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent11: (¬{G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> {E}{b} sent12: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent13: (x): (¬{D}x & {C}x) -> {B}{is} sent14: {A}{a} sent15: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Chapman is both Cockney and a buckskins. | ({CE}{is} & {B}{is}) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the Chapman is a Cockney and it is not non-aroid.; int1 -> int2: the Chapman is a Cockney.; sent1 & sent6 -> int3: the monsoon is not pictorial.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the monsoon does not invade monsoon and is esoteric is not correct.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not invade monsoon and it is esoteric is wrong.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the South invades monsoon.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does invade monsoon.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the defibrillator is not a kind of a searchlight.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the Cabernet is both not a top and not a pyrogallol.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the Cabernet is Gaussian.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is Gaussian.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the fact that the Shaker is not polymorphous but it is totalitarian is not false.; int12 -> int13: something is non-polymorphous and not non-totalitarian.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: the Chapman is a kind of a buckskins.; int2 & int14 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that the Shaker is not a buckskins is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the dicot is pictorial is not false the monsoon is not a pictorial. sent2: the South invades monsoon if there is something such that that it does not invades monsoon and is esoteric does not hold. sent3: if there is something such that it is Gaussian then the Shaker is not polymorphous but it is totalitarian. sent4: the serranid is aroid and invades altoist. sent5: if the defibrillator is not a kind of a searchlight the Cabernet is not a top and it is not a pyrogallol. sent6: the dicot is pictorial. sent7: if the monsoon is not a kind of a pictorial that it does not invade monsoon and is esoteric is not true. sent8: the defibrillator is not a searchlight if that there is something such that it does invade monsoon hold. sent9: everything is Cockney thing that is aroid. sent10: the Shaker is a kind of aroid thing that is a buckskins. sent11: the Cabernet is Gaussian if it is not a top and it is not a kind of a pyrogallol. sent12: that something is both not a totalitarian and not aroid is not right if the fact that it is polymorphous is not false. sent13: the Chapman is a buckskins if there is something such that it is not polymorphous and is a kind of a totalitarian. sent14: the Shaker is aroid. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is Gaussian and is a pyrogallol. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the icicle is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: the icicle is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline. sent2: the fact that something is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline is incorrect if it is not nonracial. sent3: the petard does not invade coastline. sent4: the icicle is not a betrayal. sent5: if something is not nonracial then it does not invade coastline and it does not chondrify raisin. | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: ¬{AB}{gi} sent4: ¬{AA}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AB}x & ¬{DO}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the icicle is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the icicle is not nonracial then that it is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline is wrong.;"
]
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the icicle is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline. ; $context$ = sent1: the icicle is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline. sent2: the fact that something is not a betrayal and does not invade coastline is incorrect if it is not nonracial. sent3: the petard does not invade coastline. sent4: the icicle is not a betrayal. sent5: if something is not nonracial then it does not invade coastline and it does not chondrify raisin. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the solder does iterate. | {D}{b} | sent1: the solder does not iterate if there exists something such that that either it is not a podzol or it does smuggle or both does not hold. sent2: something does not misdeal. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not invade inoculator is not false. sent4: the solder is not an easing. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a podzol and/or it iterates does not hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is a Gable and it is not a bandage is not right. sent7: there is something such that it is not a coursework. sent8: that something does not chondrify Burnside or it strengthens Mandelbrot or both is not right if it is a misdeal. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does iterate and/or it does smuggle is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not misdeal then the fact that the bacon is not a podzol or smuggles or both is not correct. sent11: something is not a Christianity or it is nonsubmersible or both. sent12: if there is something such that it does not smuggle then the bacon does not iterate. sent13: the bacon does not smuggle if there exists something such that it does not iterate. sent14: the bacon does not smuggle if the fact that something does not misdeal is not wrong. sent15: if there is something such that it does not iterate then the fact that the solder does not smuggle or it is a kind of a podzol or both is wrong. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x) -> ¬{D}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{IR}x sent4: ¬{DP}{b} sent5: (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x v {D}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬{DL}x sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{GB}x v {HN}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬({D}x v {C}x) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent11: (Ex): (¬{CS}x v {IQ}x) sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}{a} sent13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent15: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) | [
"sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the bacon is not a podzol and/or it does smuggle does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a podzol or it does smuggle or both is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent10 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x); int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the solder does iterate. | {D}{b} | []
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the solder does iterate. ; $context$ = sent1: the solder does not iterate if there exists something such that that either it is not a podzol or it does smuggle or both does not hold. sent2: something does not misdeal. sent3: there exists something such that that it does not invade inoculator is not false. sent4: the solder is not an easing. sent5: there is something such that that it is not a podzol and/or it iterates does not hold. sent6: there is something such that that it is a Gable and it is not a bandage is not right. sent7: there is something such that it is not a coursework. sent8: that something does not chondrify Burnside or it strengthens Mandelbrot or both is not right if it is a misdeal. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it does iterate and/or it does smuggle is not correct. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not misdeal then the fact that the bacon is not a podzol or smuggles or both is not correct. sent11: something is not a Christianity or it is nonsubmersible or both. sent12: if there is something such that it does not smuggle then the bacon does not iterate. sent13: the bacon does not smuggle if there exists something such that it does not iterate. sent14: the bacon does not smuggle if the fact that something does not misdeal is not wrong. sent15: if there is something such that it does not iterate then the fact that the solder does not smuggle or it is a kind of a podzol or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the bacon is not a podzol and/or it does smuggle does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a podzol or it does smuggle or both is not correct.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the havelock is not unshaven. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: if the power does not plane biochip that the brownie is unshaven and it is dimorphic is false. sent2: the havelock axes. sent3: the havelock is unshaven if the brownie does plane biochip. sent4: the fact that the brownie does plane biochip is right. sent5: the brownie is unshaven. sent6: The fact that the biochip does plane brownie is right. sent7: the inosine does plane biochip. | sent1: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: {GT}{b} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {B}{a} sent6: {AA}{aa} sent7: {A}{am} | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the havelock is not unshaven. | ¬{B}{b} | []
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the havelock is not unshaven. ; $context$ = sent1: if the power does not plane biochip that the brownie is unshaven and it is dimorphic is false. sent2: the havelock axes. sent3: the havelock is unshaven if the brownie does plane biochip. sent4: the fact that the brownie does plane biochip is right. sent5: the brownie is unshaven. sent6: The fact that the biochip does plane brownie is right. sent7: the inosine does plane biochip. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the capacitance does not occur and the hotbedness does not occur is not right. | ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) | sent1: the watching disaccharide occurs or the watching Aare happens or both. sent2: if the disestablishment does not occur the hotbedness occurs and the dousing Numidian happens. sent3: that the paperwork occurs is triggered by that the uneventfulness occurs. sent4: the planing promisee happens if the planing overcast happens. sent5: if the paperwork occurs then the capacitance does not occur and the hotbedness does not occur. sent6: the paperwork occurs if the one-hitter occurs. sent7: the disestablishment does not occur and the sapping syncopation does not occur if the planing promisee occurs. sent8: the capacitance does not occur and the paperwork does not occur if the hotbedness occurs. sent9: the one-hitter occurs and/or the uneventfulness occurs. | sent1: ({K} v {L}) sent2: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) sent3: {B} -> {C} sent4: {J} -> {I} sent5: {C} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent6: {A} -> {C} sent7: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) sent8: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent9: ({A} v {B}) | [
"sent9 & sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the paperwork happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent6 & sent3 -> int1: {C}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the attrition occurs. | {JI} | []
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the capacitance does not occur and the hotbedness does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the watching disaccharide occurs or the watching Aare happens or both. sent2: if the disestablishment does not occur the hotbedness occurs and the dousing Numidian happens. sent3: that the paperwork occurs is triggered by that the uneventfulness occurs. sent4: the planing promisee happens if the planing overcast happens. sent5: if the paperwork occurs then the capacitance does not occur and the hotbedness does not occur. sent6: the paperwork occurs if the one-hitter occurs. sent7: the disestablishment does not occur and the sapping syncopation does not occur if the planing promisee occurs. sent8: the capacitance does not occur and the paperwork does not occur if the hotbedness occurs. sent9: the one-hitter occurs and/or the uneventfulness occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the paperwork happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the sprawler is not a worship and not ammonitic. | (¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | sent1: the clearway is unipolar. sent2: the sprawler does not worship. sent3: if the fact that the evaporite does plane phlogopite and is a Davy is not right then the frog does not plane phlogopite. sent4: the sprawler is not a worship if there exists something such that that it does till is true. sent5: if the fact that something is not branchless but it evens does not hold then it is a kind of a glaciation. sent6: that the frog is a kind of non-branchless thing that is evening is not right if that it does not plane phlogopite is right. sent7: something is a Olympian and is a kind of a cancroid if it is not a hieratic. sent8: the pharmacologist is unipolar. sent9: the evaporite is not bloodless. sent10: that something is not a kind of a worship and it is not ammonitic is not true if it is a till. sent11: that if something is a glaciation then that it is not a ophthalmectomy and it is a hieratic is false is not wrong. sent12: the sprawler is not a worship and is not ammonitic if there exists something such that it does till. sent13: the sprawler is not a worship and it does not till. sent14: the pharmacologist does worship and it is unipolar. sent15: the pharmacologist is non-ammonitic thing that does not beard. sent16: that that the fact that the evaporite does plane phlogopite and it is the Davy is right is not correct if the evaporite is not bloodless is correct. sent17: if the Chianti is a Olympian the pharmacologist is unipolar. | sent1: {B}{cp} sent2: ¬{D}{b} sent3: ¬({L}{e} & {N}{e}) -> ¬{L}{d} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {K}x) -> {I}x sent6: ¬{L}{d} -> ¬(¬{J}{d} & {K}{d}) sent7: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: ¬{M}{e} sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) sent11: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) sent12: (x): {A}x -> (¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent13: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent14: ({D}{a} & {B}{a}) sent15: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{HK}{a}) sent16: ¬{M}{e} -> ¬({L}{e} & {N}{e}) sent17: {E}{c} -> {B}{a} | []
| []
| that the sprawler is not a worship and it is not ammonitic does not hold. | ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [
"sent10 -> int1: if the sprawler is a kind of a till then the fact that it is not a worship and is not ammonitic is incorrect.; sent7 -> int2: if the Chianti is not hieratic then it is a Olympian and a cancroid.; sent11 -> int3: the fact that the frog is both not a ophthalmectomy and a hieratic is not true if it is a kind of a glaciation.; sent5 -> int4: the frog is a glaciation if the fact that it is both not branchless and evening is wrong.; sent16 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the evaporite does plane phlogopite and it is a Davy is incorrect.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the frog does not plane phlogopite.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: that the frog is not branchless but it is evening is wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the frog is a glaciation.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the frog is not a kind of a ophthalmectomy but it is not non-hieratic is not right.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a ophthalmectomy and it is a hieratic is not true.;"
]
| 12 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the sprawler is not a worship and not ammonitic. ; $context$ = sent1: the clearway is unipolar. sent2: the sprawler does not worship. sent3: if the fact that the evaporite does plane phlogopite and is a Davy is not right then the frog does not plane phlogopite. sent4: the sprawler is not a worship if there exists something such that that it does till is true. sent5: if the fact that something is not branchless but it evens does not hold then it is a kind of a glaciation. sent6: that the frog is a kind of non-branchless thing that is evening is not right if that it does not plane phlogopite is right. sent7: something is a Olympian and is a kind of a cancroid if it is not a hieratic. sent8: the pharmacologist is unipolar. sent9: the evaporite is not bloodless. sent10: that something is not a kind of a worship and it is not ammonitic is not true if it is a till. sent11: that if something is a glaciation then that it is not a ophthalmectomy and it is a hieratic is false is not wrong. sent12: the sprawler is not a worship and is not ammonitic if there exists something such that it does till. sent13: the sprawler is not a worship and it does not till. sent14: the pharmacologist does worship and it is unipolar. sent15: the pharmacologist is non-ammonitic thing that does not beard. sent16: that that the fact that the evaporite does plane phlogopite and it is the Davy is right is not correct if the evaporite is not bloodless is correct. sent17: if the Chianti is a Olympian the pharmacologist is unipolar. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the cactus is salamandriform. | {C}{b} | sent1: the fact that the nankeen is a Y is not wrong. sent2: if the nankeen is perceptible then the cactus is salamandriform. sent3: the cactus does not douse cod. sent4: the dobson is perceptible. sent5: the khan is agential if it does douse cod. | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent3: ¬{E}{b} sent4: {B}{ja} sent5: {E}{c} -> {D}{c} | []
| []
| that the singleton is a Y hold. | {A}{ag} | [
"sent3 -> int1: there is something such that it does not douse cod.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cactus is salamandriform. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nankeen is a Y is not wrong. sent2: if the nankeen is perceptible then the cactus is salamandriform. sent3: the cactus does not douse cod. sent4: the dobson is perceptible. sent5: the khan is agential if it does douse cod. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it does douse girlfriend and saps celerity. | (Ex): ({C}x & {B}x) | sent1: that the tufa saps celerity if the musician is a kind of a volt-ampere is not wrong. sent2: the tufa is a volt-ampere. sent3: there exists something such that it douses girlfriend. sent4: there is something such that it does sap celerity and is a volt-ampere. sent5: there is something such that it is painless. sent6: there exists something such that it is arenicolous. sent7: the musician is a kind of a fixative. sent8: that the neurogliacyte is a kind of a volt-ampere is correct. sent9: the tufa does douse girlfriend. sent10: something douses girlfriend and is a kind of a volt-ampere. sent11: there exists something such that it is Draconian. sent12: there is something such that it is a volt-ampere. sent13: The girlfriend douses musician. sent14: the tufa is a Lincolnshire that does douse girlfriend. sent15: if the tufa does douse girlfriend then the cryometer douse girlfriend. sent16: the musician douses girlfriend. sent17: there exists something such that it does watch puka. sent18: there is something such that it saps celerity. sent19: if the musician does sap celerity the tufa douses girlfriend. sent20: if the musician is a volt-ampere then the tufa douses girlfriend. sent21: there is something such that it is shambolic. | sent1: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: (Ex): {C}x sent4: (Ex): ({B}x & {A}x) sent5: (Ex): {GS}x sent6: (Ex): {HC}x sent7: {AR}{b} sent8: {A}{r} sent9: {C}{a} sent10: (Ex): ({C}x & {A}x) sent11: (Ex): {CJ}x sent12: (Ex): {A}x sent13: {AB}{ab} sent14: ({CE}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: {C}{a} -> {C}{jd} sent16: {C}{b} sent17: (Ex): {S}x sent18: (Ex): {B}x sent19: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} sent20: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent21: (Ex): {IT}x | []
| []
| the cryometer douses girlfriend. | {C}{jd} | []
| 6 | 3 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does douse girlfriend and saps celerity. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tufa saps celerity if the musician is a kind of a volt-ampere is not wrong. sent2: the tufa is a volt-ampere. sent3: there exists something such that it douses girlfriend. sent4: there is something such that it does sap celerity and is a volt-ampere. sent5: there is something such that it is painless. sent6: there exists something such that it is arenicolous. sent7: the musician is a kind of a fixative. sent8: that the neurogliacyte is a kind of a volt-ampere is correct. sent9: the tufa does douse girlfriend. sent10: something douses girlfriend and is a kind of a volt-ampere. sent11: there exists something such that it is Draconian. sent12: there is something such that it is a volt-ampere. sent13: The girlfriend douses musician. sent14: the tufa is a Lincolnshire that does douse girlfriend. sent15: if the tufa does douse girlfriend then the cryometer douse girlfriend. sent16: the musician douses girlfriend. sent17: there exists something such that it does watch puka. sent18: there is something such that it saps celerity. sent19: if the musician does sap celerity the tufa douses girlfriend. sent20: if the musician is a volt-ampere then the tufa douses girlfriend. sent21: there is something such that it is shambolic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the reactor is a western. | {D}{b} | sent1: the fact that either the parturition is not dynamic or it is not a western or both hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a western then the reactor is a kind of a dynamic. sent3: the muslin is a kind of a tie or it is not planographic or both. sent4: there exists something such that either it is not a western or it is not a Palaic or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Palaic then the parturition is a dynamic or it is not a western or both. sent6: the parturition is a Palaic and/or it is not a western. sent7: if there exists something such that it is a western the parturition is a kind of a dynamic or it is not a Palaic or both. sent8: the reactor is a kind of a Palaic. sent9: if something does douse violin then the parturition is not a Palaic or not dynamic or both. sent10: there exists something such that it douses violin. sent11: the reactor is western if something either is not a Palaic or is not a dynamic or both. sent12: either something is lovable or it is not a colleen or both. sent13: the reactor is a AAS and/or is not arundinaceous. sent14: the naturopath is monometallic and/or it is not progestational. sent15: the parturition is a kind of a terminal. sent16: there is something such that it is monometallic. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a western then the parturition is not a Palaic and/or is not dynamic. sent18: there is something such that either it is not lovable or it is not a kind of a carcase or both. sent19: the parturition is a kind of a dynamic and/or it is not a western. | sent1: (¬{C}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{D}x -> {C}{b} sent3: ({BC}{dj} v ¬{IE}{dj}) sent4: (Ex): (¬{D}x v ¬{B}x) sent5: (x): {B}x -> ({C}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) sent6: ({B}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) sent7: (x): {D}x -> ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent8: {B}{b} sent9: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent10: (Ex): {A}x sent11: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {D}{b} sent12: (Ex): ({CJ}x v ¬{BD}x) sent13: ({EB}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) sent14: ({IK}{gd} v ¬{GG}{gd}) sent15: {FJ}{a} sent16: (Ex): {IK}x sent17: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent18: (Ex): (¬{CJ}x v ¬{BE}x) sent19: ({C}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) | [
"sent10 & sent9 -> int1: either the parturition is not a Palaic or it is not a dynamic or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is not a Palaic or it is not a dynamic or both.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent10 & sent9 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x); int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the reactor is a western. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that either the parturition is not dynamic or it is not a western or both hold. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a western then the reactor is a kind of a dynamic. sent3: the muslin is a kind of a tie or it is not planographic or both. sent4: there exists something such that either it is not a western or it is not a Palaic or both. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Palaic then the parturition is a dynamic or it is not a western or both. sent6: the parturition is a Palaic and/or it is not a western. sent7: if there exists something such that it is a western the parturition is a kind of a dynamic or it is not a Palaic or both. sent8: the reactor is a kind of a Palaic. sent9: if something does douse violin then the parturition is not a Palaic or not dynamic or both. sent10: there exists something such that it douses violin. sent11: the reactor is western if something either is not a Palaic or is not a dynamic or both. sent12: either something is lovable or it is not a colleen or both. sent13: the reactor is a AAS and/or is not arundinaceous. sent14: the naturopath is monometallic and/or it is not progestational. sent15: the parturition is a kind of a terminal. sent16: there is something such that it is monometallic. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a western then the parturition is not a Palaic and/or is not dynamic. sent18: there is something such that either it is not lovable or it is not a kind of a carcase or both. sent19: the parturition is a kind of a dynamic and/or it is not a western. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent9 -> int1: either the parturition is not a Palaic or it is not a dynamic or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is not a Palaic or it is not a dynamic or both.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the thumbtack does not profit. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: if there is something such that that that it is not bubaline and it is not a tee is true is not right then the heart watches peasanthood. sent2: that the thumbtack does not watch arroyo but it planes scent if the fact that the technical does not planes scent is correct is correct. sent3: if the technical does not disapprove and does not ovulate then it does not plane scent. sent4: the technical does not ovulate. sent5: the fact that something is instructive but it is not a ununpentium does not hold if it watches peasanthood. sent6: if something does not watch arroyo and planes scent then it is not a profit. sent7: the thumbtack does plane scent. sent8: if the fact that the limb is not ergotropic and not putrid is incorrect the archbishop is not putrid. sent9: the technical does not profit. sent10: the technical does not watch arroyo if it is not a kind of a profit and does not plane scent. sent11: that the plate is not bubaline and it is not a tee is not correct if it is not a Pinot. sent12: the technical does not disapprove and does not ovulate. sent13: if the fact that the limb is both not ergotropic and smaller is wrong then the archbishop is not putrid. sent14: if the technical does not plane scent the thumbtack plane scent. sent15: if the technical does not disapprove but it does ovulate it does not plane scent. sent16: the thumbtack planes scent and/or does not profit if the archbishop is not putrid. sent17: if the fact that the technical does not plane scent and does not watch arroyo is false the thumbtack is a profit. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is instructive and is not a kind of a ununpentium does not hold the Ball is ergotropic. sent19: if there is something such that it is ergotropic the fact that the limb is not ergotropic and is smaller is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the plate is not a Pinot hold. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) -> {I}{f} sent2: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent3: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬{AB}{a} sent5: (x): {I}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{H}x) sent6: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent7: {B}{b} sent8: ¬(¬{F}{d} & ¬{D}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent9: ¬{C}{a} sent10: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent11: ¬{L}{g} -> ¬(¬{J}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) sent12: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent13: ¬(¬{F}{d} & {E}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent14: ¬{B}{a} -> {B}{b} sent15: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent16: ¬{D}{c} -> ({B}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) sent17: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent18: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{H}x) -> {F}{e} sent19: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{F}{d} & {E}{d}) sent20: ¬{L}{g} | [
"sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the technical does not plane scent.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the thumbtack does not watch arroyo and does plane scent.; sent6 -> int3: the thumbtack does not profit if it does not watch arroyo and does plane scent.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent12 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent2 -> int2: (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}); sent6 -> int3: (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the thumbtack is a profit. | {C}{b} | []
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the thumbtack does not profit. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that that it is not bubaline and it is not a tee is true is not right then the heart watches peasanthood. sent2: that the thumbtack does not watch arroyo but it planes scent if the fact that the technical does not planes scent is correct is correct. sent3: if the technical does not disapprove and does not ovulate then it does not plane scent. sent4: the technical does not ovulate. sent5: the fact that something is instructive but it is not a ununpentium does not hold if it watches peasanthood. sent6: if something does not watch arroyo and planes scent then it is not a profit. sent7: the thumbtack does plane scent. sent8: if the fact that the limb is not ergotropic and not putrid is incorrect the archbishop is not putrid. sent9: the technical does not profit. sent10: the technical does not watch arroyo if it is not a kind of a profit and does not plane scent. sent11: that the plate is not bubaline and it is not a tee is not correct if it is not a Pinot. sent12: the technical does not disapprove and does not ovulate. sent13: if the fact that the limb is both not ergotropic and smaller is wrong then the archbishop is not putrid. sent14: if the technical does not plane scent the thumbtack plane scent. sent15: if the technical does not disapprove but it does ovulate it does not plane scent. sent16: the thumbtack planes scent and/or does not profit if the archbishop is not putrid. sent17: if the fact that the technical does not plane scent and does not watch arroyo is false the thumbtack is a profit. sent18: if there exists something such that that it is instructive and is not a kind of a ununpentium does not hold the Ball is ergotropic. sent19: if there is something such that it is ergotropic the fact that the limb is not ergotropic and is smaller is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the plate is not a Pinot hold. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the technical does not plane scent.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the thumbtack does not watch arroyo and does plane scent.; sent6 -> int3: the thumbtack does not profit if it does not watch arroyo and does plane scent.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the silicate is not a kind of a Psocoptera is true. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: if the heating is hydrostatics then that the silicate is a Psocoptera is correct. sent2: that the heating is hydrostatics hold. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of non-hydrostatics thing that is not a range is incorrect it is non-hydrostatics. | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{D}x) -> {A}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the silicate is not a Psocoptera. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the caseworm is hydrostatics if that it is not hydrostatics and it is not a range is not true.;"
]
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the silicate is not a kind of a Psocoptera is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the heating is hydrostatics then that the silicate is a Psocoptera is correct. sent2: that the heating is hydrostatics hold. sent3: if the fact that something is a kind of non-hydrostatics thing that is not a range is incorrect it is non-hydrostatics. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the electromechanicalness happens. | {A} | sent1: if that the Anguillanness does not occur and the revenantness does not occur is wrong then the revenantness occurs. sent2: if that the stream occurs and the ballottement does not occur is not right then the watching applicability does not occur. sent3: if the planing musk occurs the peacefulness does not occur. sent4: the non-revenantness is caused by that the electromechanicalness occurs. sent5: the fact that the non-Anguillanness and the non-revenantness happens is false. sent6: if the planing vagary does not occur and/or the watching applicability does not occur the fact that the Anguillan does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that both the non-prolateness and the leeward happens does not hold. sent8: if that either the electromechanicalness or the revenant or both occurs is false then the dousing council does not occur. | sent1: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) -> {B} sent2: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} sent3: {JK} -> ¬{EM} sent4: {A} -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) sent6: (¬{D} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent7: ¬(¬{AL} & {FM}) sent8: ¬({A} v {B}) -> ¬{JA} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the electromechanicalness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the revenantness does not occur.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the revenantness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: {B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the dousing council does not occur. | ¬{JA} | []
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the electromechanicalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Anguillanness does not occur and the revenantness does not occur is wrong then the revenantness occurs. sent2: if that the stream occurs and the ballottement does not occur is not right then the watching applicability does not occur. sent3: if the planing musk occurs the peacefulness does not occur. sent4: the non-revenantness is caused by that the electromechanicalness occurs. sent5: the fact that the non-Anguillanness and the non-revenantness happens is false. sent6: if the planing vagary does not occur and/or the watching applicability does not occur the fact that the Anguillan does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that both the non-prolateness and the leeward happens does not hold. sent8: if that either the electromechanicalness or the revenant or both occurs is false then the dousing council does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the electromechanicalness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the revenantness does not occur.; sent1 & sent5 -> int2: the revenantness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the uninucleateness happens. | {F} | sent1: if that the hatching occurs is not false the fact that the reorientation does not occur and the infernalness does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the crackle does not occur and the planing tufa does not occur is false. sent3: the hatching occurs if the thematicness happens. sent4: if the infernal happens the discarding does not occur and the hatching occurs. sent5: if the fact that the unpleasantness happens is true the fact that the sapping Drymarchon does not occur and the dousing trypsin does not occur is not correct. sent6: the thematicness occurs and/or the discard happens. sent7: that the discard occurs prevents that the hatch does not occur. | sent1: {C} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent2: ¬(¬{AC} & ¬{DU}) sent3: {A} -> {C} sent4: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent5: {DF} -> ¬(¬{EG} & ¬{GK}) sent6: ({A} v {B}) sent7: {B} -> {C} | [
"sent6 & sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the hatching occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the reorientation does not occur and the infernalness does not occur is not true hold.;"
]
| [
"sent6 & sent3 & sent7 -> int1: {C}; sent1 & int1 -> int2: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D});"
]
| the habitation occurs. | {CH} | []
| 6 | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the uninucleateness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hatching occurs is not false the fact that the reorientation does not occur and the infernalness does not occur does not hold. sent2: the fact that the crackle does not occur and the planing tufa does not occur is false. sent3: the hatching occurs if the thematicness happens. sent4: if the infernal happens the discarding does not occur and the hatching occurs. sent5: if the fact that the unpleasantness happens is true the fact that the sapping Drymarchon does not occur and the dousing trypsin does not occur is not correct. sent6: the thematicness occurs and/or the discard happens. sent7: that the discard occurs prevents that the hatch does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the hatching occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the reorientation does not occur and the infernalness does not occur is not true hold.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it does not plane quira. | (Ex): ¬{B}x | sent1: something douses IFC if it is not a loganberry. sent2: the oscilloscope douses IFC if it is not a loganberry. sent3: something does not plane saltiness but it douses IFC if it is not a kind of a loganberry. sent4: the oscilloscope douses IFC. sent5: the fact that the oscilloscope is not vulvar and it is not a kind of a loganberry is not wrong. sent6: if the oscilloscope is not proteinaceous or does not aurify or both it is not proteinaceous. sent7: the oscilloscope either is not proteinaceous or does not aurify or both. | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: {AB}{aa} sent5: (¬{C}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent6: (¬{FR}{aa} v ¬{F}{aa}) -> ¬{FR}{aa} sent7: (¬{FR}{aa} v ¬{F}{aa}) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the oscilloscope does not plane saltiness but it douses IFC if it is not a kind of a loganberry.; sent5 -> int2: the oscilloscope is not a loganberry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the oscilloscope does not plane saltiness and does douse IFC is right.;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent5 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa});"
]
| the oscilloscope is not proteinaceous and does not douse save-all. | (¬{FR}{aa} & ¬{FE}{aa}) | [
"sent6 & sent7 -> int4: that the oscilloscope is not proteinaceous is true.;"
]
| 5 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not plane quira. ; $context$ = sent1: something douses IFC if it is not a loganberry. sent2: the oscilloscope douses IFC if it is not a loganberry. sent3: something does not plane saltiness but it douses IFC if it is not a kind of a loganberry. sent4: the oscilloscope douses IFC. sent5: the fact that the oscilloscope is not vulvar and it is not a kind of a loganberry is not wrong. sent6: if the oscilloscope is not proteinaceous or does not aurify or both it is not proteinaceous. sent7: the oscilloscope either is not proteinaceous or does not aurify or both. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: the oscilloscope does not plane saltiness but it douses IFC if it is not a kind of a loganberry.; sent5 -> int2: the oscilloscope is not a loganberry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the oscilloscope does not plane saltiness and does douse IFC is right.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the colonoscope is not peaceable. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: something is not vulvar if that it does not watch Mnemosyne and it planes acquisitiveness is not correct. sent2: the harvester is not peaceable if the colonoscope does not watch Gesner and is not peaceable. sent3: something is traditional if that it is not traditional and planes serialization is wrong. sent4: if that the harvester does not dilapidate and it does not watch hospice does not hold it watches Gesner. sent5: the fact that the harvester does not dilapidate and it does not watch hospice is wrong. sent6: if there exists something such that it is vulvar and it is not a bowed the fixer does not watch ashram. sent7: the transom is not araneidal. sent8: that the harvester does not dilapidate but it watches hospice is not correct. sent9: something is a kind of a Hermosillo and it does bow if it is not vulvar. sent10: something is peaceable if it does plane mink. sent11: if the harvester does not watch ashram and watches Gesner then the colonoscope does plane mink. sent12: if the harvester planes mink the colonoscope is not peaceable. sent13: the Sennenhunde is araneidal if it is traditional. sent14: if the transom is not araneidal then that it does not watch Mnemosyne and it planes acquisitiveness does not hold. sent15: if something watches Mnemosyne then it is vulvar and not a bowed. sent16: if either the harvester watches Gesner or it does plane mink or both the colonoscope is not peaceable. sent17: the fact that the harvester dilapidates but it does not watch hospice is not correct. sent18: if the fixer does not watch ashram then that the Passer does not plane mink and is not a Hermosillo is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Passer does not plane mink and is not a kind of a Hermosillo is incorrect the transom does not plane mink. sent20: the colonoscope does not watch Gesner and it is not peaceable if the transom does not plane mink. sent21: the ashram does not dilapidate. sent22: the fact that the Sennenhunde is non-traditional thing that does plane serialization is not correct. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x sent2: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {L}x) -> {K}x sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent6: (x): ({G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}{e} sent7: ¬{J}{c} sent8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) sent10: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent11: (¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent12: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent13: {K}{g} -> {J}{g} sent14: ¬{J}{c} -> ¬(¬{H}{c} & {I}{c}) sent15: (x): {H}x -> ({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent16: ({B}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent17: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent18: ¬{D}{e} -> ¬(¬{A}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent19: ¬(¬{A}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent20: ¬{A}{c} -> (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent21: ¬{AA}{hm} sent22: ¬(¬{K}{g} & {L}{g}) | [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the harvester watches Gesner.; int1 -> int2: either the harvester watches Gesner or it planes mink or both.; sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({B}{a} v {A}{a}); sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the colonoscope is not non-peaceable. | {C}{b} | [
"sent10 -> int3: the colonoscope is peaceable if it does plane mink.; sent9 -> int4: the transom is a Hermosillo and it is a bowed if it is not vulvar.; sent1 -> int5: if that the transom does not watch Mnemosyne and does plane acquisitiveness is false then it is not vulvar.; sent14 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the transom does not watch Mnemosyne and planes acquisitiveness does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the transom is non-vulvar.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the transom is both a Hermosillo and a bowed.; int8 -> int9: the transom is a kind of a Hermosillo.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a Hermosillo.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the colonoscope is not peaceable. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not vulvar if that it does not watch Mnemosyne and it planes acquisitiveness is not correct. sent2: the harvester is not peaceable if the colonoscope does not watch Gesner and is not peaceable. sent3: something is traditional if that it is not traditional and planes serialization is wrong. sent4: if that the harvester does not dilapidate and it does not watch hospice does not hold it watches Gesner. sent5: the fact that the harvester does not dilapidate and it does not watch hospice is wrong. sent6: if there exists something such that it is vulvar and it is not a bowed the fixer does not watch ashram. sent7: the transom is not araneidal. sent8: that the harvester does not dilapidate but it watches hospice is not correct. sent9: something is a kind of a Hermosillo and it does bow if it is not vulvar. sent10: something is peaceable if it does plane mink. sent11: if the harvester does not watch ashram and watches Gesner then the colonoscope does plane mink. sent12: if the harvester planes mink the colonoscope is not peaceable. sent13: the Sennenhunde is araneidal if it is traditional. sent14: if the transom is not araneidal then that it does not watch Mnemosyne and it planes acquisitiveness does not hold. sent15: if something watches Mnemosyne then it is vulvar and not a bowed. sent16: if either the harvester watches Gesner or it does plane mink or both the colonoscope is not peaceable. sent17: the fact that the harvester dilapidates but it does not watch hospice is not correct. sent18: if the fixer does not watch ashram then that the Passer does not plane mink and is not a Hermosillo is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the Passer does not plane mink and is not a kind of a Hermosillo is incorrect the transom does not plane mink. sent20: the colonoscope does not watch Gesner and it is not peaceable if the transom does not plane mink. sent21: the ashram does not dilapidate. sent22: the fact that the Sennenhunde is non-traditional thing that does plane serialization is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the harvester watches Gesner.; int1 -> int2: either the harvester watches Gesner or it planes mink or both.; sent16 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the reenactor is not a perchloride. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: that the veneering is not random and is uneasy is not right. sent2: the fact that the ascomycete is not a walkover is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a mix or a perchloride or both is false. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an uplifting and/or it is a mix is false the reenactor is not a perchloride. sent4: if something is not random it is a perchloride. sent5: if the fact that the reenactor is not a kind of an uplifting but it does mix is wrong then the ascomycete is not a kind of a perchloride. sent6: the fact that the ascomycete is not a mix is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is random and/or uneasy is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that it is a differential. sent8: the push-bike is a kind of a remit or it is not a Anu or both. sent9: the fact that something does not douse taboret and/or is a Crotalidae does not hold if it is not a kind of a walkover. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Anu then it is a WAN and it is Peloponnesian. sent11: if something is a kind of a remit and/or it is not a Anu then the lasagna is not a kind of a Anu. sent12: the veneering is a walkover. sent13: the fact that the veneering is not uneasy and is not a kind of a prostatectomy is wrong if the lasagna is a kind of a WAN. sent14: something is not a Sumner and is not euphoric. sent15: that something is not an uplifting or it does mix or both is not right if it is not a walkover. sent16: the fact that the ascomycete does not mix but it is random is incorrect. sent17: the reenactor is not a walkover if there is something such that that it is not a perchloride and/or it is uneasy does not hold. sent18: something does impress. sent19: if the reenactor is not random but it is a perchloride then the fact that that the ghetto is a walkover is correct is not true. | sent1: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AB}x v {B}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> {B}x sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬({C}x v {D}x) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent7: (Ex): {EF}x sent8: ({L}{d} v ¬{I}{d}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{CQ}x v {E}x) sent10: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & {H}x) sent11: (x): ({L}x v ¬{I}x) -> ¬{I}{c} sent12: {A}{b} sent13: {G}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) sent14: (Ex): (¬{K}x & ¬{J}x) sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent16: ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent17: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v {D}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: (Ex): {JC}x sent19: (¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{fd} | [
"sent15 -> int1: if the ascomycete is not a walkover that it is not an uplifting and/or it is a mix is not true.;"
]
| [
"sent15 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa});"
]
| that the ghetto does not douse taboret and/or it is a Crotalidae is not correct. | ¬(¬{CQ}{fd} v {E}{fd}) | [
"sent9 -> int2: if the ghetto is not a walkover then that either it does not douse taboret or it is a Crotalidae or both is not true.; sent10 -> int3: the lasagna is a kind of a WAN and it is Peloponnesian if it is not a kind of a Anu.; sent8 -> int4: there exists something such that it remits or it is not a Anu or both.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the lasagna is not a Anu.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lasagna is a WAN and it is Peloponnesian.; int6 -> int7: the lasagna is a WAN.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: that the veneering is not uneasy and is not a prostatectomy is not right.;"
]
| 9 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the reenactor is not a perchloride. ; $context$ = sent1: that the veneering is not random and is uneasy is not right. sent2: the fact that the ascomycete is not a walkover is not false if there is something such that the fact that it is not a mix or a perchloride or both is false. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of an uplifting and/or it is a mix is false the reenactor is not a perchloride. sent4: if something is not random it is a perchloride. sent5: if the fact that the reenactor is not a kind of an uplifting but it does mix is wrong then the ascomycete is not a kind of a perchloride. sent6: the fact that the ascomycete is not a mix is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is random and/or uneasy is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that it is a differential. sent8: the push-bike is a kind of a remit or it is not a Anu or both. sent9: the fact that something does not douse taboret and/or is a Crotalidae does not hold if it is not a kind of a walkover. sent10: if something is not a kind of a Anu then it is a WAN and it is Peloponnesian. sent11: if something is a kind of a remit and/or it is not a Anu then the lasagna is not a kind of a Anu. sent12: the veneering is a walkover. sent13: the fact that the veneering is not uneasy and is not a kind of a prostatectomy is wrong if the lasagna is a kind of a WAN. sent14: something is not a Sumner and is not euphoric. sent15: that something is not an uplifting or it does mix or both is not right if it is not a walkover. sent16: the fact that the ascomycete does not mix but it is random is incorrect. sent17: the reenactor is not a walkover if there is something such that that it is not a perchloride and/or it is uneasy does not hold. sent18: something does impress. sent19: if the reenactor is not random but it is a perchloride then the fact that that the ghetto is a walkover is correct is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent15 -> int1: if the ascomycete is not a walkover that it is not an uplifting and/or it is a mix is not true.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the acceptiveness does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: both the watching misanthrope and the pursuance happens. sent2: that the acceptiveness does not occur is right if both the Bismarckianness and the watching misanthrope occurs. sent3: the Bismarckianness and the stir occurs. | sent1: ({C} & {E}) sent2: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent3: ({A} & {B}) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the Bismarckianness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the watching misanthrope happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Bismarckianness and the watching misanthrope happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: {A}; sent1 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the acceptiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the watching misanthrope and the pursuance happens. sent2: that the acceptiveness does not occur is right if both the Bismarckianness and the watching misanthrope occurs. sent3: the Bismarckianness and the stir occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: the Bismarckianness occurs.; sent1 -> int2: the watching misanthrope happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Bismarckianness and the watching misanthrope happens.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the proselyte is a kind of a herbivore. | {B}{a} | sent1: if the Viyella is not a jubilee then the fact that either it is radiopaque or it is not a prey or both is incorrect. sent2: the proselyte is a prey if the headman is not agronomic. sent3: everything is not agronomic. sent4: the headman does prey. sent5: if the fact that something is radiopaque and/or it does not prey is false then it is a kind of a herbivore. sent6: the Viyella is a kind of a Scythia if the fact that the proselyte is not a Scythia but it is agronomic is not true. sent7: if something saps conclusion then the fact that it is both not a Scythia and agronomic does not hold. sent8: everything saps conclusion and is not a pillow. sent9: the vulgarian is not agronomic. sent10: the proselyte does prey. | sent1: ¬{G}{ab} -> ¬({D}{ab} v ¬{C}{ab}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{A}x sent4: {C}{aa} sent5: (x): ¬({D}x v ¬{C}x) -> {B}x sent6: ¬(¬{CO}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {CO}{ab} sent7: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{CO}x & {A}x) sent8: (x): ({E}x & ¬{F}x) sent9: ¬{A}{dq} sent10: {C}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the headman is not agronomic.;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa};"
]
| the Viyella is a Scythia and it is a herbivore. | ({CO}{ab} & {B}{ab}) | [
"sent7 -> int2: the fact that the proselyte is not a Scythia but it is agronomic is not true if it saps conclusion.; sent8 -> int3: the proselyte does sap conclusion but it is not a kind of a pillow.; int3 -> int4: the proselyte saps conclusion.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the proselyte is not a kind of a Scythia but it is agronomic is false.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the Viyella is a Scythia.; sent5 -> int7: the Viyella is a kind of a herbivore if the fact that it is radiopaque or not a prey or both is false.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the proselyte is a kind of a herbivore. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Viyella is not a jubilee then the fact that either it is radiopaque or it is not a prey or both is incorrect. sent2: the proselyte is a prey if the headman is not agronomic. sent3: everything is not agronomic. sent4: the headman does prey. sent5: if the fact that something is radiopaque and/or it does not prey is false then it is a kind of a herbivore. sent6: the Viyella is a kind of a Scythia if the fact that the proselyte is not a Scythia but it is agronomic is not true. sent7: if something saps conclusion then the fact that it is both not a Scythia and agronomic does not hold. sent8: everything saps conclusion and is not a pillow. sent9: the vulgarian is not agronomic. sent10: the proselyte does prey. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: the headman is not agronomic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it does not watch Thrace the fact that it does plane disinterestedness is not wrong is false. | ¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> {C}x) | sent1: something detracts if it does not douse titterer. sent2: if the titterer does watch Thrace it does plane disinterestedness. sent3: something that does not watch Thrace planes disinterestedness. sent4: if the titterer is not a kind of a whiff then it planes disinterestedness. sent5: something that watches Thrace does plane disinterestedness. sent6: the titterer is a platitudinarian if it does not plane disinterestedness. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not Gallic hold then it is a ununquadium. sent8: if something is not a ununquadium then it is a emotionality. sent9: if the fact that the Reticulum is not a daybook hold then it is a suppressant. sent10: there is something such that if it watches Thrace then the fact that it does plane disinterestedness hold. sent11: something douses rig if it is not a botany. sent12: the battledore is doctoral if it is not unable. | sent1: (x): ¬{GK}x -> {HA}x sent2: {B}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x sent4: ¬{HR}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: ¬{C}{aa} -> {CC}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> {FP}x sent8: (x): ¬{FP}x -> {BU}x sent9: ¬{A}{b} -> {IT}{b} sent10: (Ex): {B}x -> {C}x sent11: (x): ¬{CR}x -> {BF}x sent12: ¬{AU}{gt} -> {JK}{gt} | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the titterer does not watch Thrace it planes disinterestedness.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not watch Thrace the fact that it does plane disinterestedness is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something detracts if it does not douse titterer. sent2: if the titterer does watch Thrace it does plane disinterestedness. sent3: something that does not watch Thrace planes disinterestedness. sent4: if the titterer is not a kind of a whiff then it planes disinterestedness. sent5: something that watches Thrace does plane disinterestedness. sent6: the titterer is a platitudinarian if it does not plane disinterestedness. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not Gallic hold then it is a ununquadium. sent8: if something is not a ununquadium then it is a emotionality. sent9: if the fact that the Reticulum is not a daybook hold then it is a suppressant. sent10: there is something such that if it watches Thrace then the fact that it does plane disinterestedness hold. sent11: something douses rig if it is not a botany. sent12: the battledore is doctoral if it is not unable. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: if the titterer does not watch Thrace it planes disinterestedness.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the discussant is not a kind of a swatter. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the fact that the discussant does swatter but it does not douse quern is not right. sent2: that the inspector is not a kind of a anil but it douses quern does not hold. sent3: if that something is a kind of phonetic thing that is a Northumberland is not correct then it is not a condensate. sent4: that the inspector is a swatter but not a anil is incorrect. sent5: if that the inspector is not a kind of a anil and does not douse quern is not correct then the discussant is not a kind of a swatter. sent6: the fact that that the discussant is not a anil and is not a exobiology is correct does not hold. sent7: if the diplomate is a pecan that the necktie is not a semen and is not a swatter does not hold. sent8: there is nothing such that it douses quern and it is not a swatter. sent9: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a swatter and does douse quern. sent10: there is nothing that is not a anil and does douse quern. sent11: there is nothing such that it saps consideration and it is not a darner. sent12: if the fact that the discussant does not swatter and it is not a semen is wrong the inspector is not a swatter. sent13: the discussant is not a anil if that the inspector is not a swatter and does not douse quern is wrong. sent14: if that the Sardinian is not a kind of a condensate is not false either it is not enzymatic or it is a pecan or both. sent15: if the fact that the Sardinian does not watch disambiguator is true that it is phonetic and it is a kind of a Northumberland is incorrect. sent16: that the inspector does not douse quern but it is dendritic is incorrect. sent17: if the inspector does douse quern the discussant does not swatter. sent18: the fact that that the discussant does not parley but it douses estoppel is wrong hold. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is not a anil and it does not douse quern. sent20: that the discussant does not douse quern and swatters is not correct. | sent1: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent4: ¬({A}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{DM}{a}) sent7: {C}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬({AB}x & ¬{A}x) sent9: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {AB}x) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: (x): ¬({CF}x & ¬{CR}x) sent12: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent13: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{a} sent14: ¬{E}{d} -> (¬{D}{d} v {C}{d}) sent15: ¬{H}{d} -> ¬({F}{d} & {G}{d}) sent16: ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {GG}{aa}) sent17: {AB}{aa} -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: ¬(¬{BB}{a} & {EF}{a}) sent19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent20: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) | [
"sent19 -> int1: the fact that the inspector is not a kind of a anil and it does not douse quern is incorrect.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent19 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the discussant is not a swatter is false. | {A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int2: the Sardinian is not a condensate if the fact that it is a kind of phonetic thing that is a Northumberland does not hold.;"
]
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the discussant is not a kind of a swatter. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the discussant does swatter but it does not douse quern is not right. sent2: that the inspector is not a kind of a anil but it douses quern does not hold. sent3: if that something is a kind of phonetic thing that is a Northumberland is not correct then it is not a condensate. sent4: that the inspector is a swatter but not a anil is incorrect. sent5: if that the inspector is not a kind of a anil and does not douse quern is not correct then the discussant is not a kind of a swatter. sent6: the fact that that the discussant is not a anil and is not a exobiology is correct does not hold. sent7: if the diplomate is a pecan that the necktie is not a semen and is not a swatter does not hold. sent8: there is nothing such that it douses quern and it is not a swatter. sent9: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a swatter and does douse quern. sent10: there is nothing that is not a anil and does douse quern. sent11: there is nothing such that it saps consideration and it is not a darner. sent12: if the fact that the discussant does not swatter and it is not a semen is wrong the inspector is not a swatter. sent13: the discussant is not a anil if that the inspector is not a swatter and does not douse quern is wrong. sent14: if that the Sardinian is not a kind of a condensate is not false either it is not enzymatic or it is a pecan or both. sent15: if the fact that the Sardinian does not watch disambiguator is true that it is phonetic and it is a kind of a Northumberland is incorrect. sent16: that the inspector does not douse quern but it is dendritic is incorrect. sent17: if the inspector does douse quern the discussant does not swatter. sent18: the fact that that the discussant does not parley but it douses estoppel is wrong hold. sent19: there exists nothing such that it is not a anil and it does not douse quern. sent20: that the discussant does not douse quern and swatters is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent19 -> int1: the fact that the inspector is not a kind of a anil and it does not douse quern is incorrect.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the dye is a roulette. | {B}{a} | sent1: that the trustbuster is a kind of a suit that is not an incurable is not right. sent2: if the Sardinian is an incurable then the dye is a piano. sent3: that the dye is not a roulette is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a roulette and it is not non-piano is incorrect. sent4: if that the trustbuster suits but it is not an incurable is not correct then that it is an incurable is not incorrect. sent5: something is a kind of a piano if it is a kind of an incurable. sent6: that something is a kind of a roulette and it is a piano is not correct if it is not an incurable. sent7: if something is not a roulette it is an incurable. sent8: if the trustbuster is a piano the dye is a kind of a roulette. | sent1: ¬({E}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent2: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬({E}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) -> {A}{aa} sent5: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x sent8: {C}{aa} -> {B}{a} | [
"sent5 -> int1: if the trustbuster is an incurable it is piano.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the trustbuster is not curable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trustbuster is not non-piano.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{aa}; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the dye is a piano. | {C}{a} | [
"sent7 -> int4: the Sardinian is a kind of an incurable if it is not a roulette.;"
]
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the dye is a roulette. ; $context$ = sent1: that the trustbuster is a kind of a suit that is not an incurable is not right. sent2: if the Sardinian is an incurable then the dye is a piano. sent3: that the dye is not a roulette is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a roulette and it is not non-piano is incorrect. sent4: if that the trustbuster suits but it is not an incurable is not correct then that it is an incurable is not incorrect. sent5: something is a kind of a piano if it is a kind of an incurable. sent6: that something is a kind of a roulette and it is a piano is not correct if it is not an incurable. sent7: if something is not a roulette it is an incurable. sent8: if the trustbuster is a piano the dye is a kind of a roulette. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: if the trustbuster is an incurable it is piano.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the trustbuster is not curable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the trustbuster is not non-piano.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is not a power it does not regulate and it is a musketeer does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a supplementation then it does not hush and it is a Machiavellian. sent2: there is something such that if it powers it does not regulate and it is a musketeer. sent3: if the epidiascope does not malt it does not regulate and is a soupspoon. sent4: the epidiascope does not bate and is a musketeer if it is a kind of a fragment. sent5: if the fact that something is not Slovakian is right then it does not watch Joachim and it douses cine-camera. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Vesuvius it is a script. sent7: the dessert is a kind of a karyotype if it does not regulate. sent8: if the epicanthus is not a power it watches Hylactophryne. sent9: if the deification does douse germanium then it is non-mesial thing that is a musketeer. sent10: if something is not a sneaker then it is not a kind of a soupspoon and it is nonindustrial. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not watch tetherball it does plane Alepisaurus and it does embed. sent12: the epidiascope malts and it regulates if it is not subtractive. sent13: that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a power it does regulate and it is a musketeer hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not honest then it is not thirsty. sent15: there is something such that if it is not pteridological it bates and it does douse Cyclophorus. sent16: if the epidiascope is not a power it does not regulate and it is a musketeer. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coffer then it is not paramagnetic and watches stigmatism. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{IG}x -> (¬{HP}x & {BL}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬{IO}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AS}{aa}) sent4: {FN}{aa} -> (¬{DQ}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{EM}x -> (¬{BR}x & {AC}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{HC}x -> {JF}x sent7: ¬{AA}{e} -> {JB}{e} sent8: ¬{A}{cu} -> {AD}{cu} sent9: {HD}{ih} -> (¬{JH}{ih} & {AB}{ih}) sent10: (x): ¬{L}x -> (¬{AS}x & {FA}x) sent11: (Ex): ¬{HT}x -> ({GN}x & {GL}x) sent12: ¬{CT}{aa} -> ({IO}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬{EQ}x -> ¬{IN}x sent15: (Ex): ¬{BH}x -> ({DQ}x & {HJ}x) sent16: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent17: (Ex): ¬{FL}x -> (¬{HH}x & {BN}x) | [
"sent16 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it is not a sneaker then it is not a soupspoon but nonindustrial. | (Ex): ¬{L}x -> (¬{AS}x & {FA}x) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the pointsman is not a soupspoon but it is nonindustrial if it is not a kind of a sneaker.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a power it does not regulate and it is a musketeer does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a supplementation then it does not hush and it is a Machiavellian. sent2: there is something such that if it powers it does not regulate and it is a musketeer. sent3: if the epidiascope does not malt it does not regulate and is a soupspoon. sent4: the epidiascope does not bate and is a musketeer if it is a kind of a fragment. sent5: if the fact that something is not Slovakian is right then it does not watch Joachim and it douses cine-camera. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Vesuvius it is a script. sent7: the dessert is a kind of a karyotype if it does not regulate. sent8: if the epicanthus is not a power it watches Hylactophryne. sent9: if the deification does douse germanium then it is non-mesial thing that is a musketeer. sent10: if something is not a sneaker then it is not a kind of a soupspoon and it is nonindustrial. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not watch tetherball it does plane Alepisaurus and it does embed. sent12: the epidiascope malts and it regulates if it is not subtractive. sent13: that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a power it does regulate and it is a musketeer hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is not honest then it is not thirsty. sent15: there is something such that if it is not pteridological it bates and it does douse Cyclophorus. sent16: if the epidiascope is not a power it does not regulate and it is a musketeer. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coffer then it is not paramagnetic and watches stigmatism. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it is either not a Embothrium or anodic or both is false it is a kind of a hill. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic is incorrect then it is a hill. sent2: if the coprolite is not a kind of a Embothrium and/or is anodic it does hill. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic the fact that it is a hill is not incorrect. sent4: something that is not a Embothrium or is anodic or both does hill. sent5: if that the coprolite is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic does not hold then it does hill. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if that it either is not a Tartu or is a snoop or both is not true then it is a penitentiary hold. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic is incorrect it is a hill. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent3: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent4: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬(¬{IT}x v {AN}x) -> {FB}x sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is either not a Embothrium or anodic or both is false it is a kind of a hill. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic is incorrect then it is a hill. sent2: if the coprolite is not a kind of a Embothrium and/or is anodic it does hill. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic the fact that it is a hill is not incorrect. sent4: something that is not a Embothrium or is anodic or both does hill. sent5: if that the coprolite is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic does not hold then it does hill. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if that it either is not a Tartu or is a snoop or both is not true then it is a penitentiary hold. sent7: if the fact that something is a kind of a Embothrium and/or it is anodic is incorrect it is a hill. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the chondrichthian is not exodontics. | ¬{D}{a} | sent1: if something that is olfactory planes Waterloo then that it is not exodontics is true. sent2: if something is olfactory but it does not plane Waterloo then it is not exodontics. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a cod then the chondrichthian does not plane Waterloo. sent4: if the chondrichthian is olfactory and planes Waterloo it is not exodontics. sent5: if there is something such that it is a cod then the chondrichthian is olfactory thing that does not plane Waterloo. sent6: the chondrichthian does not plane Waterloo. sent7: there is something such that it is a cod. | sent1: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent2: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent4: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: ¬{C}{a} sent7: (Ex): {A}x | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the chondrichthian is olfactory thing that does not plane Waterloo.; sent2 -> int2: the chondrichthian is non-exodontics if it is olfactory and it does not plane Waterloo.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent2 -> int2: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the chondrichthian is not exodontics. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is olfactory planes Waterloo then that it is not exodontics is true. sent2: if something is olfactory but it does not plane Waterloo then it is not exodontics. sent3: if there is something such that it is a kind of a cod then the chondrichthian does not plane Waterloo. sent4: if the chondrichthian is olfactory and planes Waterloo it is not exodontics. sent5: if there is something such that it is a cod then the chondrichthian is olfactory thing that does not plane Waterloo. sent6: the chondrichthian does not plane Waterloo. sent7: there is something such that it is a cod. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the chondrichthian is olfactory thing that does not plane Waterloo.; sent2 -> int2: the chondrichthian is non-exodontics if it is olfactory and it does not plane Waterloo.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the snout is not indusial. | ¬{C}{c} | sent1: if the diplomate dispenses then the Casanova is a tetherball and is not a revivalism. sent2: the snout is arundinaceous. sent3: that the diplomate is not arundinaceous is not wrong. sent4: if the Casanova is not arundinaceous the snout is not indusial. sent5: the snout does not watch arroyo if the Casanova is a tetherball and not a revivalism. sent6: if the fact that the Casanova is arundinaceous thing that is not indusial is not right it is not a tetherball. sent7: that the diplomate is both a revivalism and not indusial is not true. sent8: the diplomate dispenses if the rampion does dispenses. sent9: if the diplomate is a revivalism it does not watch arroyo. sent10: the fact that the Casanova is arundinaceous and does not plane clot is incorrect. sent11: the Casanova is non-indusial. sent12: that the diplomate is a tetherball and a revivalism is not true. sent13: the diplomate watches arroyo if the Casanova is arundinaceous. sent14: the diplomate does not watch arroyo if that it is a kind of a tetherball and is not a revivalism is false. | sent1: {F}{b} -> ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent2: {A}{c} sent3: ¬{A}{b} sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} sent5: ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent6: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent7: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent8: {F}{d} -> {F}{b} sent9: {D}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent10: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{CC}{a}) sent11: ¬{C}{a} sent12: ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent14: ¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Casanova is arundinaceous.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the diplomate does watch arroyo.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b};"
]
| the snout is indusial. | {C}{c} | []
| 7 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the snout is not indusial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the diplomate dispenses then the Casanova is a tetherball and is not a revivalism. sent2: the snout is arundinaceous. sent3: that the diplomate is not arundinaceous is not wrong. sent4: if the Casanova is not arundinaceous the snout is not indusial. sent5: the snout does not watch arroyo if the Casanova is a tetherball and not a revivalism. sent6: if the fact that the Casanova is arundinaceous thing that is not indusial is not right it is not a tetherball. sent7: that the diplomate is both a revivalism and not indusial is not true. sent8: the diplomate dispenses if the rampion does dispenses. sent9: if the diplomate is a revivalism it does not watch arroyo. sent10: the fact that the Casanova is arundinaceous and does not plane clot is incorrect. sent11: the Casanova is non-indusial. sent12: that the diplomate is a tetherball and a revivalism is not true. sent13: the diplomate watches arroyo if the Casanova is arundinaceous. sent14: the diplomate does not watch arroyo if that it is a kind of a tetherball and is not a revivalism is false. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Casanova is arundinaceous.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the diplomate does watch arroyo.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the incisor does not pontificate and does disjoin does not hold. | ¬(¬{D}{d} & {B}{d}) | sent1: if the wedge does not disjoin and it does not douse sterol the dosser does not disjoin. sent2: that the wedge is not a flaw and disjoins does not hold. sent3: if the slingback is warmed and it watches scripted then the Omani does not disjoin. sent4: if the wedge does flaw then the slingback does not warm and does watch scripted. sent5: the fact that the incisor does not pontificate but it does disjoin is false if the Omani does not disjoin. sent6: if the fact that the wedge is cytogenetics and does plane Bornean does not hold the fact that it does not plane Bornean is not wrong. sent7: the wedge is a kind of a flaw. sent8: if that the incisor is a crux and does not douse sterol is not true then it is not a flaw. sent9: the Omani does not disjoin if the fact that the slingback is a kind of non-warmed thing that does watch scripted is not wrong. sent10: the wedge is a crux or it douses sterol or both if there exists something such that it does douses sterol. sent11: the incisor does douse sterol if the wedge is a crux. sent12: if something does douse sterol then it disjoins. sent13: something is not a Northumberland. sent14: the incisor douses sterol if the wedge does douses sterol. sent15: something does plane Bornean and it flaws if it is not cytogenetics. sent16: that if there exists something such that it is not a Northumberland then the slingback douses sterol is true. sent17: the slingback is both non-bronchiolar and a flaw. | sent1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{fu} sent2: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent3: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent4: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent5: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{d} & {B}{d}) sent6: ¬({H}{a} & {F}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent7: {A}{a} sent8: ¬({E}{d} & ¬{C}{d}) -> ¬{A}{d} sent9: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent10: (x): {C}x -> ({E}{a} v {C}{a}) sent11: {E}{a} -> {C}{d} sent12: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent13: (Ex): ¬{G}x sent14: {C}{a} -> {C}{d} sent15: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {A}x) sent16: (x): ¬{G}x -> {C}{b} sent17: (¬{FG}{b} & {A}{b}) | [
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the slingback does not warm and watches scripted.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Omani does not disjoin.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent7 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent9 & int1 -> int2: ¬{B}{c}; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the incisor does not pontificate but it disjoins. | (¬{D}{d} & {B}{d}) | [
"sent16 & sent13 -> int3: the slingback douses sterol.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it does douse sterol.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the wedge either is a crux or douses sterol or both.; sent11 & sent14 & int5 -> int6: the incisor douses sterol.; sent12 -> int7: the incisor disjoins if it douses sterol.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the incisor does disjoin.; sent15 -> int9: the chimpanzee planes Bornean and it is a kind of a flaw if it is not cytogenetics.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the incisor does not pontificate and does disjoin does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wedge does not disjoin and it does not douse sterol the dosser does not disjoin. sent2: that the wedge is not a flaw and disjoins does not hold. sent3: if the slingback is warmed and it watches scripted then the Omani does not disjoin. sent4: if the wedge does flaw then the slingback does not warm and does watch scripted. sent5: the fact that the incisor does not pontificate but it does disjoin is false if the Omani does not disjoin. sent6: if the fact that the wedge is cytogenetics and does plane Bornean does not hold the fact that it does not plane Bornean is not wrong. sent7: the wedge is a kind of a flaw. sent8: if that the incisor is a crux and does not douse sterol is not true then it is not a flaw. sent9: the Omani does not disjoin if the fact that the slingback is a kind of non-warmed thing that does watch scripted is not wrong. sent10: the wedge is a crux or it douses sterol or both if there exists something such that it does douses sterol. sent11: the incisor does douse sterol if the wedge is a crux. sent12: if something does douse sterol then it disjoins. sent13: something is not a Northumberland. sent14: the incisor douses sterol if the wedge does douses sterol. sent15: something does plane Bornean and it flaws if it is not cytogenetics. sent16: that if there exists something such that it is not a Northumberland then the slingback douses sterol is true. sent17: the slingback is both non-bronchiolar and a flaw. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the slingback does not warm and watches scripted.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Omani does not disjoin.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the hexane planes walnut hold. | {E}{b} | sent1: the uptake ravels. sent2: if the hexane does not plane walnut and forgets the uptake is not a kind of a Pugin. sent3: the hexane does not plane sculptor. sent4: the Phoebe is not Pauline if that either the sculptor is Pauline or it planes Activase or both is not true. sent5: if the hexane does not plane walnut and does forget then the fact that the uptake does not ravel is right. sent6: something is not a newspapering and is not a kind of a broom if it is not Pauline. sent7: the hexane does not plane walnut but it is a kind of a Pugin if it ravels. sent8: the hexane does not watch boyfriend if it is industrial. sent9: the catarrhine does forget. sent10: the fact that the sculptor is Pauline and/or does plane Activase is wrong. sent11: the uptake is not a venography and not non-blue-collar if it is a Pugin. sent12: if something is a corral it is non-irreducible. sent13: the uptake forgets. sent14: if the uptake does ravel then it is a voicelessness. sent15: that the Phoebe does forget and/or it is not a kind of a Pugin does not hold if that it is not a kind of a newspapering hold. sent16: that something is not a Pugin but it forgets if it is a kind of a voicelessness is not incorrect. sent17: something does not ravel if it planes walnut. sent18: if the hexane is a voicelessness then it watches cam. sent19: if the uptake is not a Pugin but it does forget the hexane does not plane walnut. | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent3: ¬{EQ}{b} sent4: ¬({H}{d} v {J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent5: (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) sent7: {A}{b} -> (¬{E}{b} & {C}{b}) sent8: {FM}{b} -> ¬{AT}{b} sent9: {D}{hd} sent10: ¬({H}{d} v {J}{d}) sent11: {C}{a} -> (¬{AB}{a} & {IE}{a}) sent12: (x): {DQ}x -> ¬{AA}x sent13: {D}{a} sent14: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent15: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent16: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) sent17: (x): {E}x -> ¬{A}x sent18: {B}{b} -> {CT}{b} sent19: (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{E}{b} | [
"sent14 & sent1 -> int1: the uptake is a voicelessness.; sent16 -> int2: the uptake is not a kind of a Pugin and does forget if it is a kind of a voicelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the uptake is not a Pugin but it does forget is not incorrect.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent14 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent16 -> int2: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}); int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the hexane planes walnut is right. | {E}{b} | [
"sent6 -> int4: the Phoebe is both not a newspapering and not a broom if it is not Pauline.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the Phoebe is not Pauline.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Phoebe is not a newspapering and it is not a kind of a broom.; int6 -> int7: the Phoebe is not a newspapering.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: that the Phoebe forgets and/or it is not a kind of a Pugin is not correct.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it does forget and/or is not a Pugin is not true.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the hexane planes walnut hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the uptake ravels. sent2: if the hexane does not plane walnut and forgets the uptake is not a kind of a Pugin. sent3: the hexane does not plane sculptor. sent4: the Phoebe is not Pauline if that either the sculptor is Pauline or it planes Activase or both is not true. sent5: if the hexane does not plane walnut and does forget then the fact that the uptake does not ravel is right. sent6: something is not a newspapering and is not a kind of a broom if it is not Pauline. sent7: the hexane does not plane walnut but it is a kind of a Pugin if it ravels. sent8: the hexane does not watch boyfriend if it is industrial. sent9: the catarrhine does forget. sent10: the fact that the sculptor is Pauline and/or does plane Activase is wrong. sent11: the uptake is not a venography and not non-blue-collar if it is a Pugin. sent12: if something is a corral it is non-irreducible. sent13: the uptake forgets. sent14: if the uptake does ravel then it is a voicelessness. sent15: that the Phoebe does forget and/or it is not a kind of a Pugin does not hold if that it is not a kind of a newspapering hold. sent16: that something is not a Pugin but it forgets if it is a kind of a voicelessness is not incorrect. sent17: something does not ravel if it planes walnut. sent18: if the hexane is a voicelessness then it watches cam. sent19: if the uptake is not a Pugin but it does forget the hexane does not plane walnut. ; $proof$ = | sent14 & sent1 -> int1: the uptake is a voicelessness.; sent16 -> int2: the uptake is not a kind of a Pugin and does forget if it is a kind of a voicelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the uptake is not a Pugin but it does forget is not incorrect.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Vaux that it is not a kind of a brakes and it is a kind of a demographic is not correct. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: there is something such that if it does not falsify then it is not a hauberk but a hurdle. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{I}x -> (¬{BD}x & {JH}x) | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Vaux that it is not a kind of a brakes and it is a kind of a demographic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not falsify then it is not a hauberk but a hurdle. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the segment does not occur. | ¬{F} | sent1: that the positioning does not occur hold. sent2: the Marathon occurs. sent3: that the pachisi happens and the TLC occurs is not true. sent4: that the triple does not occur triggers that the holiness occurs and/or the consultancy does not occur. sent5: that the three-dimensionalness but not the Marathon happens yields that the segment occurs. sent6: the agraphicness happens. sent7: the three-dimensionalness occurs. sent8: the fact that both the pachisi and the TLC occurs does not hold if the disrupting does not occur. sent9: the fact that the magistracy occurs but the dousing trophoblast does not occur does not hold. sent10: the couvade does not occur. sent11: the dousing Benjamin does not occur and the downsizing does not occur. sent12: the tweezing does not occur if the positioning happens and the usufructuariness happens. sent13: if the Marathon and the three-dimensionalness happens the disrupting does not occur. sent14: that the figurativeness occurs and the mortalness happens prevents that the riptide occurs. sent15: if that the pachisi but not the TLC occurs is incorrect the segmenting does not occur. sent16: if the TLC happens the segmenting does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the apocynaceousness and the arm happens is true. sent18: the tripling does not occur if not the downsizing but the sapping off-day occurs. sent19: the fact that the watching naturopath happens is right. sent20: the sapping off-day occurs and the preoccupation occurs if the positioning does not occur. | sent1: ¬{M} sent2: {A} sent3: ¬({E} & {D}) sent4: ¬{I} -> ({G} v ¬{H}) sent5: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> {F} sent6: {FU} sent7: {B} sent8: ¬{C} -> ¬({E} & {D}) sent9: ¬({FJ} & ¬{DB}) sent10: ¬{HL} sent11: (¬{N} & ¬{K}) sent12: ({M} & {HF}) -> ¬{BO} sent13: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent14: ({JE} & {ER}) -> ¬{BM} sent15: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{F} sent16: {D} -> ¬{F} sent17: ({EP} & {FA}) sent18: (¬{K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} sent19: {FM} sent20: ¬{M} -> ({J} & {L}) | [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: both the Marathon and the three-dimensionalness happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the disrupting does not occur.;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent13 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C};"
]
| the segment occurs. | {F} | [
"sent11 -> int3: the downsizing does not occur.; sent20 & sent1 -> int4: the sapping off-day occurs and the preoccupation happens.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the sapping off-day does not occur is wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the downsizing does not occur but the sapping off-day occurs is not wrong.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the triple does not occur.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the holiness occurs or the consultancy does not occur or both.;"
]
| 10 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the segment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the positioning does not occur hold. sent2: the Marathon occurs. sent3: that the pachisi happens and the TLC occurs is not true. sent4: that the triple does not occur triggers that the holiness occurs and/or the consultancy does not occur. sent5: that the three-dimensionalness but not the Marathon happens yields that the segment occurs. sent6: the agraphicness happens. sent7: the three-dimensionalness occurs. sent8: the fact that both the pachisi and the TLC occurs does not hold if the disrupting does not occur. sent9: the fact that the magistracy occurs but the dousing trophoblast does not occur does not hold. sent10: the couvade does not occur. sent11: the dousing Benjamin does not occur and the downsizing does not occur. sent12: the tweezing does not occur if the positioning happens and the usufructuariness happens. sent13: if the Marathon and the three-dimensionalness happens the disrupting does not occur. sent14: that the figurativeness occurs and the mortalness happens prevents that the riptide occurs. sent15: if that the pachisi but not the TLC occurs is incorrect the segmenting does not occur. sent16: if the TLC happens the segmenting does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the apocynaceousness and the arm happens is true. sent18: the tripling does not occur if not the downsizing but the sapping off-day occurs. sent19: the fact that the watching naturopath happens is right. sent20: the sapping off-day occurs and the preoccupation occurs if the positioning does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent7 -> int1: both the Marathon and the three-dimensionalness happens.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the disrupting does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the revocableness happens. | {C} | sent1: the binding does not occur and the disqualification occurs. sent2: that the responsibility happens leads to the jagging. sent3: the telecast happens if not the combustion but the watching syncopation happens. sent4: if the apiarianness happens then the fact that the revocableness occurs hold. sent5: that the apiarianness does not occur and the telecasting does not occur prevents the revocableness. sent6: that not the wending but the watching landslide occurs triggers the unilateralness. sent7: the watching syncopation occurs. sent8: the non-apiarianness causes that not the weakening but the irrational occurs. sent9: if the dousing Igbo does not occur then the dripping and the planing Lycia happens. sent10: the seigneury does not occur and the dousing shroud happens. sent11: that the telecasting happens triggers that the apiarianness occurs. sent12: the telecast and the revocableness occurs if the planing Lycia does not occur. sent13: if both the non-digestibleness and the oratory occurs then the skimming happens. | sent1: (¬{IS} & {GQ}) sent2: {IE} -> {CQ} sent3: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent4: {A} -> {C} sent5: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: (¬{CU} & {ED}) -> {U} sent7: {AB} sent8: ¬{A} -> (¬{BG} & {AH}) sent9: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) sent10: (¬{DN} & {HT}) sent11: {B} -> {A} sent12: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) sent13: (¬{AM} & {JD}) -> {EP} | []
| []
| not the weakening but the irrationalness occurs. | (¬{BG} & {AH}) | []
| 7 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the revocableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the binding does not occur and the disqualification occurs. sent2: that the responsibility happens leads to the jagging. sent3: the telecast happens if not the combustion but the watching syncopation happens. sent4: if the apiarianness happens then the fact that the revocableness occurs hold. sent5: that the apiarianness does not occur and the telecasting does not occur prevents the revocableness. sent6: that not the wending but the watching landslide occurs triggers the unilateralness. sent7: the watching syncopation occurs. sent8: the non-apiarianness causes that not the weakening but the irrational occurs. sent9: if the dousing Igbo does not occur then the dripping and the planing Lycia happens. sent10: the seigneury does not occur and the dousing shroud happens. sent11: that the telecasting happens triggers that the apiarianness occurs. sent12: the telecast and the revocableness occurs if the planing Lycia does not occur. sent13: if both the non-digestibleness and the oratory occurs then the skimming happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it does not douse concubine it is a geophagy that does douse giardia does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: the fieldworker is a gout that yaws if it is a geophagy. sent2: the giardia is a kind of a geophagy that does douse giardia if it douses concubine. sent3: the giardia is a handsaw that does douse giardia if it is not nonvolatile. sent4: there is something such that if it does not douse concubine the fact that it is a kind of a geophagy is correct. sent5: if the fact that the giardia does not douse concubine is not incorrect then it is a kind of a geophagy that does douse giardia. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not douse concubine is true then it douses giardia. sent7: something is a kind of a geophagy and does watch Culex if it is not a sacerdotalism. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not nonparametric that it is indeterminate an orphanage hold. sent9: the giardia does plane Titian and it saps dioxin if it does not douse hospice. sent10: something is a kind of a backsaw that does plane conspicuousness if it does not douse giardia. sent11: there exists something such that if it douses concubine it is a geophagy that does douse giardia. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not pointless then it is testicular and it is bacteremic. sent13: the giardia douses giardia and it is a kind of a Miniconju if that it is not a Hindu hold. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is an absolute does not hold then it does heel and it is inflationary. sent15: the giardia is a geophagy if it does not douse concubine. sent16: there exists something such that if it does not douse trade-in it is a kind of an admirer and it is a kind of a unthoughtfulness. | sent1: {AA}{je} -> ({EO}{je} & {CU}{je}) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬{I}{aa} -> ({CD}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x sent5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent7: (x): ¬{P}x -> ({AA}x & {DH}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{FI}x -> ({GK}x & {CE}x) sent9: ¬{CF}{aa} -> ({JG}{aa} & {HE}{aa}) sent10: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ({BP}x & {CI}x) sent11: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬{BN}x -> ({BI}x & {DL}x) sent13: ¬{HR}{aa} -> ({AB}{aa} & {R}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): ¬{IO}x -> ({AO}x & {EL}x) sent15: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent16: (Ex): ¬{DC}x -> ({FS}x & {IA}x) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| if the giardia is not a sacerdotalism it is a geophagy and it watches Culex. | ¬{P}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {DH}{aa}) | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not douse concubine it is a geophagy that does douse giardia does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fieldworker is a gout that yaws if it is a geophagy. sent2: the giardia is a kind of a geophagy that does douse giardia if it douses concubine. sent3: the giardia is a handsaw that does douse giardia if it is not nonvolatile. sent4: there is something such that if it does not douse concubine the fact that it is a kind of a geophagy is correct. sent5: if the fact that the giardia does not douse concubine is not incorrect then it is a kind of a geophagy that does douse giardia. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not douse concubine is true then it douses giardia. sent7: something is a kind of a geophagy and does watch Culex if it is not a sacerdotalism. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not nonparametric that it is indeterminate an orphanage hold. sent9: the giardia does plane Titian and it saps dioxin if it does not douse hospice. sent10: something is a kind of a backsaw that does plane conspicuousness if it does not douse giardia. sent11: there exists something such that if it douses concubine it is a geophagy that does douse giardia. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not pointless then it is testicular and it is bacteremic. sent13: the giardia douses giardia and it is a kind of a Miniconju if that it is not a Hindu hold. sent14: there exists something such that if the fact that it is an absolute does not hold then it does heel and it is inflationary. sent15: the giardia is a geophagy if it does not douse concubine. sent16: there exists something such that if it does not douse trade-in it is a kind of an admirer and it is a kind of a unthoughtfulness. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the raincoat is qualitative is not wrong. | {D}{b} | sent1: that the club-moss is not a Cash does not hold if there is something such that it does douse celerity and is qualitative. sent2: the club-moss douses celerity. sent3: the terrorist is not unimodal. sent4: there exists something such that it is a Cash. sent5: the percolation is unimodal if there exists something such that it does douse celerity and is a Cash. sent6: the raincoat is qualitative if the percolation is unimodal. sent7: the raincoat is a Cash. sent8: something douses celerity. sent9: the club-moss does douse celerity and it is a Cash. sent10: if the chlorophyte is not a Cash then that the percolation douses celerity and is qualitative is incorrect. | sent1: (x): ({A}x & {D}x) -> {B}{aa} sent2: {A}{aa} sent3: ¬{C}{e} sent4: (Ex): {B}x sent5: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent6: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent7: {B}{b} sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent10: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬({A}{a} & {D}{a}) | [
"sent9 -> int1: there is something such that it douses celerity and it is a kind of a Cash.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the percolation is unimodal.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int1 & sent5 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the raincoat is not qualitative. | ¬{D}{b} | [
"sent3 -> int3: something is non-unimodal.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the raincoat is qualitative is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the club-moss is not a Cash does not hold if there is something such that it does douse celerity and is qualitative. sent2: the club-moss douses celerity. sent3: the terrorist is not unimodal. sent4: there exists something such that it is a Cash. sent5: the percolation is unimodal if there exists something such that it does douse celerity and is a Cash. sent6: the raincoat is qualitative if the percolation is unimodal. sent7: the raincoat is a Cash. sent8: something douses celerity. sent9: the club-moss does douse celerity and it is a Cash. sent10: if the chlorophyte is not a Cash then that the percolation douses celerity and is qualitative is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: there is something such that it douses celerity and it is a kind of a Cash.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the percolation is unimodal.; sent6 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if that it is not perineal and does douse Philaenus is wrong the fact that it watches classroom is right. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: if the slingback is charitable it is middle-class. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does watch Pinctada and it scripts is not right it is euphoric. sent3: if the taxidermist does not douse Philaenus but it is not non-innocuous then it is a metier. sent4: there is something such that if it is a rubric then it is developmental. sent5: the fencer watches classroom if it is not perineal and it douses Philaenus. sent6: there is something such that if it is not anticancer then it does douse waters. sent7: the fencer is a serin if that it is not a kind of a catchphrase and it is a frankness is false. sent8: the fencer does watch classroom if that it is a kind of non-perineal thing that douses Philaenus is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a nitrification it is a mason. sent10: the waters is lovable if that it is not non-pubic and it douses Philaenus is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is not perineal and does douse Philaenus it watches classroom. sent12: if that something is not a disproportion but it is a monocle does not hold it is a kind of a nonpartisan. sent13: something is a kind of a Carya if the fact that it is not maladaptive and it is a familiar does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it dogfights then it is a kind of a inanimateness. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Namibian and it is wireless does not hold then it is a hull. | sent1: {GD}{a} -> {HO}{a} sent2: (Ex): ¬({DI}x & {HN}x) -> {IK}x sent3: (¬{AB}{bb} & {DU}{bb}) -> {GE}{bb} sent4: (Ex): {CN}x -> {IG}x sent5: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬{AF}x -> {EG}x sent7: ¬(¬{CQ}{aa} & {GA}{aa}) -> {EF}{aa} sent8: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): ¬{CM}x -> {CA}x sent10: ¬({FM}{em} & {AB}{em}) -> {GB}{em} sent11: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{GQ}x & {AI}x) -> {HP}x sent13: (x): ¬(¬{DJ}x & {P}x) -> {FF}x sent14: (Ex): {CL}x -> {AD}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{BE}x & {BL}x) -> {AN}x | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if the fact that it is not maladaptive and it is a familiar is false then the fact that it is a Carya is not false. | (Ex): ¬(¬{DJ}x & {P}x) -> {FF}x | [
"sent13 -> int1: if that the slingback is non-maladaptive but not unfamiliar is not right then it is a Carya.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not perineal and does douse Philaenus is wrong the fact that it watches classroom is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the slingback is charitable it is middle-class. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does watch Pinctada and it scripts is not right it is euphoric. sent3: if the taxidermist does not douse Philaenus but it is not non-innocuous then it is a metier. sent4: there is something such that if it is a rubric then it is developmental. sent5: the fencer watches classroom if it is not perineal and it douses Philaenus. sent6: there is something such that if it is not anticancer then it does douse waters. sent7: the fencer is a serin if that it is not a kind of a catchphrase and it is a frankness is false. sent8: the fencer does watch classroom if that it is a kind of non-perineal thing that douses Philaenus is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a nitrification it is a mason. sent10: the waters is lovable if that it is not non-pubic and it douses Philaenus is not true. sent11: there is something such that if it is not perineal and does douse Philaenus it watches classroom. sent12: if that something is not a disproportion but it is a monocle does not hold it is a kind of a nonpartisan. sent13: something is a kind of a Carya if the fact that it is not maladaptive and it is a familiar does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it dogfights then it is a kind of a inanimateness. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Namibian and it is wireless does not hold then it is a hull. ; $proof$ = | sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the smuggler is not a kind of a superannuation. | ¬{AA}{a} | sent1: the hub is not mesial if the heart is not mesial. sent2: something does not ignite if that it is both not returnable and not an ax is not true. sent3: that the smuggler does not watch caff is not false. sent4: the redbird is not a superannuation and not basilar. sent5: if the fact that the heart is a kind of mesial thing that does not pelt does not hold then it is mesial. sent6: if that the hub does not plane foreignness and does douse gripsack is not true then the smuggler is a superannuation. sent7: if the smuggler does not plane foreignness then the fact that it does not watch caff is not false. sent8: The foreignness does not plane smuggler. sent9: the fact that something does not plane foreignness and does douse gripsack is not right if it does not ignite. sent10: if something is not mesial then the fact that it is not returnable and it is not an ax is wrong. sent11: the smuggler does not plane foreignness. | sent1: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬{F}{b} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: ¬{AB}{a} sent4: (¬{AA}{dj} & ¬{JE}{dj}) sent5: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent6: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {AA}{a} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent8: ¬{AC}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent10: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) sent11: ¬{A}{a} | []
| []
| the smuggler is a superannuation. | {AA}{a} | [
"sent9 -> int1: that the hub does not plane foreignness and douses gripsack is wrong if that it does not ignite is not incorrect.; sent2 -> int2: the hub does not ignite if the fact that it is both not returnable and not an ax does not hold.; sent10 -> int3: that the fact that the hub is nonreturnable and it is not the ax is not true if the hub is not mesial is not false.;"
]
| 8 | 2 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the smuggler is not a kind of a superannuation. ; $context$ = sent1: the hub is not mesial if the heart is not mesial. sent2: something does not ignite if that it is both not returnable and not an ax is not true. sent3: that the smuggler does not watch caff is not false. sent4: the redbird is not a superannuation and not basilar. sent5: if the fact that the heart is a kind of mesial thing that does not pelt does not hold then it is mesial. sent6: if that the hub does not plane foreignness and does douse gripsack is not true then the smuggler is a superannuation. sent7: if the smuggler does not plane foreignness then the fact that it does not watch caff is not false. sent8: The foreignness does not plane smuggler. sent9: the fact that something does not plane foreignness and does douse gripsack is not right if it does not ignite. sent10: if something is not mesial then the fact that it is not returnable and it is not an ax is wrong. sent11: the smuggler does not plane foreignness. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the sound is autarchic. | {D}{a} | sent1: something is not autarchic if the fact that it is autarchic and it is aeronautical does not hold. sent2: the parasail is both not non-life-support and a rent. sent3: the ashram is autarchic. sent4: the sound is aeronautical. sent5: something does douse anergy if it does befall. sent6: everything is not a guidepost. sent7: if something is not a hutment and does sap Ariidae it is not aeronautical. sent8: something saps Ariidae if it is a hutment. sent9: if the sound is a hutment then it is a nonoccurrence. sent10: something that saps Ariidae is autarchic. sent11: the sound douses uplifting. sent12: if the fact that the sound is not a hutment or is not aeronautical or both is incorrect the perisperm is autarchic. sent13: something is aeronautical if it is a hutment. sent14: something is a kind of a Pusey and/or it does not sap Ariidae if it is not a guidepost. | sent1: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent2: ({DE}{el} & {EH}{el}) sent3: {D}{if} sent4: {B}{a} sent5: (x): {GF}x -> {GB}x sent6: (x): ¬{E}x sent7: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent9: {A}{a} -> {BQ}{a} sent10: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent11: {IU}{a} sent12: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> {D}{dh} sent13: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent14: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({F}x v ¬{C}x) | [
"sent8 -> int1: that the sound does sap Ariidae if the sound is a kind of a hutment is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int2: the sound is autarchic if it saps Ariidae.;"
]
| [
"sent8 -> int1: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; sent10 -> int2: {C}{a} -> {D}{a};"
]
| the perisperm is autarchic. | {D}{dh} | [
"sent14 -> int3: the chute is a Pusey or it does not sap Ariidae or both if it is not a kind of a guidepost.; sent6 -> int4: the chute is not a kind of a guidepost.; int3 & int4 -> int5: either the chute is a kind of a Pusey or it does not sap Ariidae or both.; int5 -> int6: everything is a kind of a Pusey or it does not sap Ariidae or both.; int6 -> int7: the plover is a Pusey and/or it does not sap Ariidae.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the sound is autarchic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not autarchic if the fact that it is autarchic and it is aeronautical does not hold. sent2: the parasail is both not non-life-support and a rent. sent3: the ashram is autarchic. sent4: the sound is aeronautical. sent5: something does douse anergy if it does befall. sent6: everything is not a guidepost. sent7: if something is not a hutment and does sap Ariidae it is not aeronautical. sent8: something saps Ariidae if it is a hutment. sent9: if the sound is a hutment then it is a nonoccurrence. sent10: something that saps Ariidae is autarchic. sent11: the sound douses uplifting. sent12: if the fact that the sound is not a hutment or is not aeronautical or both is incorrect the perisperm is autarchic. sent13: something is aeronautical if it is a hutment. sent14: something is a kind of a Pusey and/or it does not sap Ariidae if it is not a guidepost. ; $proof$ = | sent8 -> int1: that the sound does sap Ariidae if the sound is a kind of a hutment is not incorrect.; sent10 -> int2: the sound is autarchic if it saps Ariidae.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if it planes redbrush then it is not a OPCW and/or it is not fictile is not right. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: if that the aldosterone is reliable is right then it does not sap wickiup and/or does not plane redbrush. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a proteome is not wrong then either it is not intelligent or it is not corrupting or both. sent3: if the fact that the aldosterone planes redbrush hold then it is a OPCW and/or it is not fictile. sent4: either the aldosterone is not a OPCW or it is not non-fictile or both if it planes redbrush. sent5: if the aldosterone planes redbrush it is not nonfictional or does not espouse or both. sent6: something does not watch ETA or it is not fictile or both if it does plane mandatary. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an incineration it is not an offset or does not plane fingerpaint or both. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it planes redbrush is true then it either is a kind of a OPCW or is not fictile or both. sent9: the aldosterone is not fictile and/or it is not cephalic if it abates. sent10: if the aldosterone is a OPCW then it does not plane sago and/or does not panel. sent11: there exists something such that if it does plane redbrush then it is not a OPCW and/or is fictile. sent12: if the aldosterone does plane redbrush either it is not a kind of a OPCW or it is non-fictile or both. sent13: the aldosterone is either not a Lycosidae or not a OPCW or both if it offsets. sent14: either the redbrush is a sarcoplasm or it is not heterotrophic or both if it is fictile. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Pectinibranchia then it is not biosynthetic or it does not douse comfort or both. sent16: there is something such that if it is mortal then it is not a Tien-pao and/or it is not insurmountable. | sent1: {HH}{aa} -> (¬{HC}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) sent2: (Ex): {EQ}x -> (¬{FQ}x v ¬{BB}x) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{JA}{aa} v ¬{CP}{aa}) sent6: (x): {FN}x -> (¬{CQ}x v ¬{AB}x) sent7: (Ex): {GM}x -> (¬{AH}x v ¬{IB}x) sent8: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent9: {BO}{aa} -> (¬{AB}{aa} v ¬{EN}{aa}) sent10: {AA}{aa} -> (¬{FH}{aa} v ¬{DK}{aa}) sent11: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent12: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent13: {AH}{aa} -> (¬{BH}{aa} v ¬{AA}{aa}) sent14: {AB}{bk} -> ({F}{bk} v ¬{JD}{bk}) sent15: (Ex): {DE}x -> (¬{EO}x v ¬{CH}x) sent16: (Ex): {DO}x -> (¬{AM}x v ¬{GK}x) | [
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the porthole does not watch ETA or it is not fictile or both if it does plane mandatary. | {FN}{dn} -> (¬{CQ}{dn} v ¬{AB}{dn}) | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it planes redbrush then it is not a OPCW and/or it is not fictile is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the aldosterone is reliable is right then it does not sap wickiup and/or does not plane redbrush. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a proteome is not wrong then either it is not intelligent or it is not corrupting or both. sent3: if the fact that the aldosterone planes redbrush hold then it is a OPCW and/or it is not fictile. sent4: either the aldosterone is not a OPCW or it is not non-fictile or both if it planes redbrush. sent5: if the aldosterone planes redbrush it is not nonfictional or does not espouse or both. sent6: something does not watch ETA or it is not fictile or both if it does plane mandatary. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an incineration it is not an offset or does not plane fingerpaint or both. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it planes redbrush is true then it either is a kind of a OPCW or is not fictile or both. sent9: the aldosterone is not fictile and/or it is not cephalic if it abates. sent10: if the aldosterone is a OPCW then it does not plane sago and/or does not panel. sent11: there exists something such that if it does plane redbrush then it is not a OPCW and/or is fictile. sent12: if the aldosterone does plane redbrush either it is not a kind of a OPCW or it is non-fictile or both. sent13: the aldosterone is either not a Lycosidae or not a OPCW or both if it offsets. sent14: either the redbrush is a sarcoplasm or it is not heterotrophic or both if it is fictile. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Pectinibranchia then it is not biosynthetic or it does not douse comfort or both. sent16: there is something such that if it is mortal then it is not a Tien-pao and/or it is not insurmountable. ; $proof$ = | sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the sycamore is non-judicial but it is neuromuscular is incorrect. | ¬(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) | sent1: if something is a germanium it is judicial. sent2: the sycamore is not judicial if the fact that it is judicial and it is a Bowery is false. sent3: that something watches Mnemosyne and is logistic does not hold if it is not a pyridine. sent4: if the shovelhead is a Bowery or it planes disinterestedness or both it is not a kind of a pyridine. sent5: the shovelhead is a germanium and it watches Mnemosyne. sent6: something that does not watch Mnemosyne is not neuromuscular and is not a kind of a germanium. sent7: if the shovelhead is judicial the fact that the sycamore is non-judicial thing that is neuromuscular is not true. sent8: the shovelhead does not watch Mnemosyne if the sycamore does watch Mnemosyne and is not non-logistic. | sent1: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent2: ¬({C}{b} & {G}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({B}x & {D}x) sent4: ({G}{a} v {H}{a}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent5: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{A}x) sent7: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) sent8: ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent5 -> int1: the shovelhead is a germanium.; sent1 -> int2: if the shovelhead is a germanium then it is judicial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shovelhead is judicial.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent1 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a}; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the sycamore is not judicial but neuromuscular. | (¬{C}{b} & {E}{b}) | [
"sent3 -> int4: the fact that the shovelhead does watch Mnemosyne and it is logistic does not hold if it is not a pyridine.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the sycamore is non-judicial but it is neuromuscular is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a germanium it is judicial. sent2: the sycamore is not judicial if the fact that it is judicial and it is a Bowery is false. sent3: that something watches Mnemosyne and is logistic does not hold if it is not a pyridine. sent4: if the shovelhead is a Bowery or it planes disinterestedness or both it is not a kind of a pyridine. sent5: the shovelhead is a germanium and it watches Mnemosyne. sent6: something that does not watch Mnemosyne is not neuromuscular and is not a kind of a germanium. sent7: if the shovelhead is judicial the fact that the sycamore is non-judicial thing that is neuromuscular is not true. sent8: the shovelhead does not watch Mnemosyne if the sycamore does watch Mnemosyne and is not non-logistic. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: the shovelhead is a germanium.; sent1 -> int2: if the shovelhead is a germanium then it is judicial.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shovelhead is judicial.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | both the chain-smoking and the inspissation happens. | ({D} & {E}) | sent1: the fact that not the planing Montagu but the definiteness occurs does not hold if the interrogativeness does not occur. sent2: if the interrogativeness happens then that the chain-smoking occurs is right. sent3: the non-definiteness results in that the watching ethylene does not occur. sent4: the non-gladiatorialness is prevented by the dousing trade-in. sent5: the Democraticness does not occur. sent6: that the Democraticness does not occur triggers that the planing Montagu and the non-newsness happens. sent7: if the definiteness occurs then the interrogative happens. sent8: if the watching ethylene does not occur then that both the chain-smoking and the inspissation happens does not hold. sent9: both the watching ethylene and the definiteness happens. sent10: the interrogativeness does not occur if the newsness does not occur and the Democraticness occurs. sent11: the southness and the repayment occurs. sent12: the inclusiveness occurs and the lahar happens. | sent1: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{F} & {B}) sent2: {C} -> {D} sent3: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent4: {IG} -> {FT} sent5: ¬{H} sent6: ¬{H} -> ({F} & ¬{G}) sent7: {B} -> {C} sent8: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent9: ({A} & {B}) sent10: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{C} sent11: ({J} & {IS}) sent12: ({HG} & {II}) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the definiteness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the interrogativeness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the chain-smoking happens.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the planing Montagu and the non-newsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the planing Montagu occurs.;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent7 -> int2: {C}; int2 & sent2 -> int3: {D}; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: ({F} & ¬{G}); int4 -> int5: {F};"
]
| that the chain-smoking and the inspissation occurs is not true. | ¬({D} & {E}) | []
| 9 | 4 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the chain-smoking and the inspissation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the planing Montagu but the definiteness occurs does not hold if the interrogativeness does not occur. sent2: if the interrogativeness happens then that the chain-smoking occurs is right. sent3: the non-definiteness results in that the watching ethylene does not occur. sent4: the non-gladiatorialness is prevented by the dousing trade-in. sent5: the Democraticness does not occur. sent6: that the Democraticness does not occur triggers that the planing Montagu and the non-newsness happens. sent7: if the definiteness occurs then the interrogative happens. sent8: if the watching ethylene does not occur then that both the chain-smoking and the inspissation happens does not hold. sent9: both the watching ethylene and the definiteness happens. sent10: the interrogativeness does not occur if the newsness does not occur and the Democraticness occurs. sent11: the southness and the repayment occurs. sent12: the inclusiveness occurs and the lahar happens. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: the definiteness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the interrogativeness happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the chain-smoking happens.; sent6 & sent5 -> int4: the planing Montagu and the non-newsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the planing Montagu occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the nonmonotonicness and the kill occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the monotonicness does not occur if the planing fossil does not occur. sent2: if the coitalness occurs the sketching and the non-associativeness occurs. sent3: the monotonicness does not occur. sent4: the titillation happens and/or the planing fossil does not occur if the dousing sniffer does not occur. sent5: the sketching prevents the barnburner. sent6: if that the tailback does not occur and the orthodonticsness does not occur is incorrect the dousing sniffer does not occur. sent7: the barnburner does not occur if the sketch does not occur and the associativeness occurs. sent8: if the barnburner does not occur then the fact that the tailback does not occur and the orthodonticsness does not occur is false. sent9: if the planing fossil occurs that that the nonmonotonicness and the kill happens is false hold. sent10: that the dousing sniffer does not occur results in that the planing fossil and the titillation occurs. sent11: the planing fossil does not occur. sent12: if the auctioning does not occur and the dousing certificate does not occur then that the planing Baltic does not occur is right. sent13: if the planing fossil does not occur both the non-monotonicness and the killing happens. sent14: if the barnburner does not occur then the fact that both the tailback and the orthodonticsness occurs does not hold. sent15: the coitalness occurs if the determining happens and/or the planing Baltic does not occur. | sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent2: {I} -> ({G} & ¬{H}) sent3: ¬{AA} sent4: ¬{C} -> ({B} v ¬{A}) sent5: {G} -> ¬{F} sent6: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent7: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} sent8: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent9: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent10: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent11: ¬{A} sent12: (¬{M} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent13: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent15: ({J} v ¬{K}) -> {I} | [
"sent13 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the monotonicness does not occur and the kill occurs is false. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | []
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nonmonotonicness and the kill occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the monotonicness does not occur if the planing fossil does not occur. sent2: if the coitalness occurs the sketching and the non-associativeness occurs. sent3: the monotonicness does not occur. sent4: the titillation happens and/or the planing fossil does not occur if the dousing sniffer does not occur. sent5: the sketching prevents the barnburner. sent6: if that the tailback does not occur and the orthodonticsness does not occur is incorrect the dousing sniffer does not occur. sent7: the barnburner does not occur if the sketch does not occur and the associativeness occurs. sent8: if the barnburner does not occur then the fact that the tailback does not occur and the orthodonticsness does not occur is false. sent9: if the planing fossil occurs that that the nonmonotonicness and the kill happens is false hold. sent10: that the dousing sniffer does not occur results in that the planing fossil and the titillation occurs. sent11: the planing fossil does not occur. sent12: if the auctioning does not occur and the dousing certificate does not occur then that the planing Baltic does not occur is right. sent13: if the planing fossil does not occur both the non-monotonicness and the killing happens. sent14: if the barnburner does not occur then the fact that both the tailback and the orthodonticsness occurs does not hold. sent15: the coitalness occurs if the determining happens and/or the planing Baltic does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent13 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Koranicness happens. | {B} | sent1: that the space occurs is right. sent2: the admixture occurs. sent3: the dousing BTU happens. sent4: if the autolyticness happens the catting happens. sent5: the totemicness occurs. sent6: if the euphemisticness occurs the scalicness occurs. sent7: the submission happens. sent8: if the unseasonableness occurs the comatoseness happens. sent9: the fact that the dousing pseudoephedrine occurs is not incorrect. sent10: the dousing terrier occurs. sent11: the Koranicness is brought about by the binariness. sent12: the abomination happens. sent13: the binariness happens. sent14: the cercarialness happens if the anagraming happens. sent15: the lining occurs. sent16: the extenuation happens. sent17: the cakewalking happens. sent18: that the bionicness occurs yields the planing spark. sent19: the Singhaleseness happens. sent20: the shorts happens. sent21: that the testing occurs is not wrong. sent22: the interlobularness occurs. | sent1: {HP} sent2: {EH} sent3: {FQ} sent4: {EQ} -> {DF} sent5: {G} sent6: {ED} -> {CU} sent7: {T} sent8: {IQ} -> {C} sent9: {EG} sent10: {CK} sent11: {A} -> {B} sent12: {BT} sent13: {A} sent14: {FE} -> {EJ} sent15: {AF} sent16: {HT} sent17: {JA} sent18: {AH} -> {GB} sent19: {HC} sent20: {AI} sent21: {Q} sent22: {FF} | [
"sent11 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the Koranicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the space occurs is right. sent2: the admixture occurs. sent3: the dousing BTU happens. sent4: if the autolyticness happens the catting happens. sent5: the totemicness occurs. sent6: if the euphemisticness occurs the scalicness occurs. sent7: the submission happens. sent8: if the unseasonableness occurs the comatoseness happens. sent9: the fact that the dousing pseudoephedrine occurs is not incorrect. sent10: the dousing terrier occurs. sent11: the Koranicness is brought about by the binariness. sent12: the abomination happens. sent13: the binariness happens. sent14: the cercarialness happens if the anagraming happens. sent15: the lining occurs. sent16: the extenuation happens. sent17: the cakewalking happens. sent18: that the bionicness occurs yields the planing spark. sent19: the Singhaleseness happens. sent20: the shorts happens. sent21: that the testing occurs is not wrong. sent22: the interlobularness occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent11 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that that it does striate and it does direct is not right is not right. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: the fact that the local directs and it does sap leitmotiv is incorrect. sent2: if something does not flutter the fact that it is a CAD that is an offering is false. sent3: if the marmalade is not premature but it does bunk the waxflower is not a kind of a bunk. sent4: there exists something such that it striates and it is direct. sent5: something does plane Carpobrotus and it does sap leitmotiv. sent6: the chordophone is not a flutter if there is something such that that it is a kind of a cycloid and it is a flutter is incorrect. sent7: that the local is striate and directs does not hold. sent8: that the marmalade is a kind of a sociable if the fact that that the allomorph is a kind of selfish thing that is not a sociable is correct is not true is true. sent9: the fact that something is a cycloid and it is a flutter is false if that it is not a kind of a bunk is true. sent10: something is not premature but it does bunk if it is a sociable. sent11: that the local is vibrionic and it does simulate does not hold. sent12: if something is not heathlike the fact that it is selfish but not sociable is not right. sent13: everything is non-heathlike. | sent1: ¬({AB}{aa} & {S}{aa}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({CJ}x & {BQ}x) sent3: (¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (Ex): ({HT}x & {S}x) sent6: (x): ¬({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent7: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) -> {E}{c} sent9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) sent10: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) sent11: ¬({O}{aa} & {HG}{aa}) sent12: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent13: (x): ¬{G}x | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that the fact that it is a CAD and it offers is not right. | (Ex): ¬({CJ}x & {BQ}x) | [
"sent9 -> int1: if the fact that the waxflower does not bunk is not false then the fact that it is a cycloid that flutters does not hold.; sent10 -> int2: the marmalade is not premature but it bunks if it is a kind of a sociable.; sent12 -> int3: if the echinus is non-heathlike then the fact that it is not unselfish but unsociable does not hold.; sent13 -> int4: the echinus is not heathlike.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the echinus is selfish but not a sociable is not correct.; int5 -> int6: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of selfish thing that is not a kind of a sociable.; int6 -> int7: that the allomorph is selfish and is not a kind of a sociable is not right.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the marmalade is sociable.; int2 & int8 -> int9: that the marmalade is non-premature thing that is a bunk is not false.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the waxflower is not a bunk.; int1 & int10 -> int11: that the waxflower is a cycloid and it is a flutter is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a cycloid and it is a kind of a flutter is false.; sent6 & int12 -> int13: the chordophone is not a flutter.; sent2 -> int14: if the chordophone does not flutter that it is a CAD and offers is not correct.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the chordophone is a CAD and it is an offering is wrong.; int15 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that that it does striate and it does direct is not right is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the local directs and it does sap leitmotiv is incorrect. sent2: if something does not flutter the fact that it is a CAD that is an offering is false. sent3: if the marmalade is not premature but it does bunk the waxflower is not a kind of a bunk. sent4: there exists something such that it striates and it is direct. sent5: something does plane Carpobrotus and it does sap leitmotiv. sent6: the chordophone is not a flutter if there is something such that that it is a kind of a cycloid and it is a flutter is incorrect. sent7: that the local is striate and directs does not hold. sent8: that the marmalade is a kind of a sociable if the fact that that the allomorph is a kind of selfish thing that is not a sociable is correct is not true is true. sent9: the fact that something is a cycloid and it is a flutter is false if that it is not a kind of a bunk is true. sent10: something is not premature but it does bunk if it is a sociable. sent11: that the local is vibrionic and it does simulate does not hold. sent12: if something is not heathlike the fact that it is selfish but not sociable is not right. sent13: everything is non-heathlike. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the cachou does watch ranking but it is not inculpatory. | ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: the narco-state is interrogative thing that is herbivorous if the cachou does not click. sent2: the cachou does watch ranking but it is non-inculpatory. sent3: the protoctist is brunet but it does not watch ranking. sent4: something is fissionable and does not watch ranking if it is not a coordinating. sent5: the cachou watches ranking. sent6: if that the narco-state does watch BASIC and it coordinates is not true it is not a coordinates. sent7: the vouge does coordinate if there is something such that that it does not watch BASIC and it is not a runup is false. sent8: that something does watch BASIC and it is a coordinating is false if it is not a runup. sent9: something does whizz but it is not a runup if it is interrogative. | sent1: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{ja} & {F}{ja}) sent2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: ({BD}{ir} & ¬{AA}{ir}) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({BT}x & ¬{AA}x) sent5: {AA}{a} sent6: ¬({B}{ja} & {A}{ja}) -> ¬{A}{ja} sent7: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) sent9: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{C}x) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the narco-state is fissionable but it does not watch ranking. | ({BT}{ja} & ¬{AA}{ja}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: that the fact that the narco-state is fissionable but it does not watch ranking is correct if the narco-state is not a coordinating is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the narco-state does watch BASIC and does coordinate is incorrect if that it is not a runup is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int3: if the narco-state is a interrogative then it does whizz and it is not a kind of a runup.;"
]
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cachou does watch ranking but it is not inculpatory. ; $context$ = sent1: the narco-state is interrogative thing that is herbivorous if the cachou does not click. sent2: the cachou does watch ranking but it is non-inculpatory. sent3: the protoctist is brunet but it does not watch ranking. sent4: something is fissionable and does not watch ranking if it is not a coordinating. sent5: the cachou watches ranking. sent6: if that the narco-state does watch BASIC and it coordinates is not true it is not a coordinates. sent7: the vouge does coordinate if there is something such that that it does not watch BASIC and it is not a runup is false. sent8: that something does watch BASIC and it is a coordinating is false if it is not a runup. sent9: something does whizz but it is not a runup if it is interrogative. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the southeaster is not a kind of an authentication. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: that the southeaster is not an authentication is not incorrect if the housefather is not a kind of a extremum. sent2: The quira does douse Circus. sent3: the Circus does douse quira. sent4: The southeaster planes Circus. sent5: the Circus planes southeaster. | sent1: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{c} sent2: {AA}{aa} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {AB}{ab} sent5: {B}{a} | [
"sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the Circus does douse quira and does plane southeaster.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it douses quira and planes southeaster is true.;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent5 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x);"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 4 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the southeaster is not a kind of an authentication. ; $context$ = sent1: that the southeaster is not an authentication is not incorrect if the housefather is not a kind of a extremum. sent2: The quira does douse Circus. sent3: the Circus does douse quira. sent4: The southeaster planes Circus. sent5: the Circus planes southeaster. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the Circus does douse quira and does plane southeaster.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it douses quira and planes southeaster is true.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the emaciating but not the stint happens does not hold. | ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: the fact that the gravure happens and the apostasy does not occur is incorrect. sent2: if the lightning and/or the Assault happens the fact that the dousing spherule does not occur hold. sent3: if the emaciating happens but the stinting does not occur then the dousing spherule happens. | sent1: ¬({IJ} & ¬{EN}) sent2: ({C} v {A}) -> ¬{B} sent3: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emaciating happens and the stint does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the dousing spherule occurs.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); sent3 & assump1 -> int1: {B};"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the emaciating but not the stint happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gravure happens and the apostasy does not occur is incorrect. sent2: if the lightning and/or the Assault happens the fact that the dousing spherule does not occur hold. sent3: if the emaciating happens but the stinting does not occur then the dousing spherule happens. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emaciating happens and the stint does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the dousing spherule occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | not the IV but the knitting happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the IV does not occur and the knitting occurs. sent2: the IV does not occur. | sent1: (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent2: ¬{AA} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = not the IV but the knitting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the IV does not occur and the knitting occurs. sent2: the IV does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the opening does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: the saturating is brought about by the non-Muhammadanness. sent2: the inhumaneness occurs if the fact that both the non-counterinsurgentness and the non-contractualness happens is incorrect. sent3: if the watching lough does not occur then the dousing fabrication does not occur. sent4: the opening and the dousing effect happens if the watching lough does not occur. sent5: that the adoptableness occurs and the dousing anticyclone does not occur triggers that the watching lough does not occur. sent6: if the inhumaneness happens the adoptableness happens but the dousing anticyclone does not occur. sent7: that the opening does not occur is brought about by that the Muhammadanness happens and the dousing fabrication occurs. sent8: the dousing fabrication happens and the dousing effect occurs. sent9: if the fact that the Muhammadanness does not occur is not incorrect then the aspiring happens and the saturating occurs. sent10: the Muhammadanness does not occur if the fact that the dousing effect and the Muhammadanness happens is not correct. sent11: both the saturating and the Muhammadanness happens. | sent1: ¬{B} -> {A} sent2: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> {I} sent3: ¬{F} -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent5: ({H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} sent6: {I} -> ({H} & ¬{G}) sent7: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent8: ({C} & {E}) sent9: ¬{B} -> ({IA} & {A}) sent10: ¬({E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent11: ({A} & {B}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the Muhammadanness happens.; sent8 -> int2: the dousing fabrication occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Muhammadanness and the dousing fabrication occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 -> int1: {B}; sent8 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the openingness occurs. | {D} | []
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the opening does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the saturating is brought about by the non-Muhammadanness. sent2: the inhumaneness occurs if the fact that both the non-counterinsurgentness and the non-contractualness happens is incorrect. sent3: if the watching lough does not occur then the dousing fabrication does not occur. sent4: the opening and the dousing effect happens if the watching lough does not occur. sent5: that the adoptableness occurs and the dousing anticyclone does not occur triggers that the watching lough does not occur. sent6: if the inhumaneness happens the adoptableness happens but the dousing anticyclone does not occur. sent7: that the opening does not occur is brought about by that the Muhammadanness happens and the dousing fabrication occurs. sent8: the dousing fabrication happens and the dousing effect occurs. sent9: if the fact that the Muhammadanness does not occur is not incorrect then the aspiring happens and the saturating occurs. sent10: the Muhammadanness does not occur if the fact that the dousing effect and the Muhammadanness happens is not correct. sent11: both the saturating and the Muhammadanness happens. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the Muhammadanness happens.; sent8 -> int2: the dousing fabrication occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Muhammadanness and the dousing fabrication occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pansy planes cackle. | {C}{b} | sent1: the pansy does not plane cackle if that the butternut does not plane cackle but it does watch smoothbore is incorrect. sent2: if something is textual then the butternut is worldly. sent3: the butternut is worldly if there exists something such that the fact that it is not textual and is tangible is not correct. sent4: the stocker does not sap triviality and/or is not non-Guyanese. sent5: that the doorway is not a barracuda but it does duck is false if the deerhound does not plane condensate. sent6: if something does watch smoothbore the pansy does plane cackle. sent7: there exists something such that that it is non-textual thing that is tangible is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not worldly and it does watch Mokulu is incorrect the triviality is anthracitic. | sent1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: (¬{G}{f} v {H}{f}) sent5: ¬{F}{e} -> ¬(¬{D}{d} & {E}{d}) sent6: (x): {B}x -> {C}{b} sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {FC}x) -> {II}{at} | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the butternut is worldly is not false.; int1 -> int2: the butternut is worldly or does watch smoothbore or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is worldly and/or does watch smoothbore.;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int2 -> int3: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x);"
]
| the pansy does not plane cackle. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent4 -> int4: there is something such that it does not sap triviality or it is a Guyanese or both.;"
]
| 8 | 4 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pansy planes cackle. ; $context$ = sent1: the pansy does not plane cackle if that the butternut does not plane cackle but it does watch smoothbore is incorrect. sent2: if something is textual then the butternut is worldly. sent3: the butternut is worldly if there exists something such that the fact that it is not textual and is tangible is not correct. sent4: the stocker does not sap triviality and/or is not non-Guyanese. sent5: that the doorway is not a barracuda but it does duck is false if the deerhound does not plane condensate. sent6: if something does watch smoothbore the pansy does plane cackle. sent7: there exists something such that that it is non-textual thing that is tangible is not correct. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not worldly and it does watch Mokulu is incorrect the triviality is anthracitic. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the butternut is worldly is not false.; int1 -> int2: the butternut is worldly or does watch smoothbore or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is worldly and/or does watch smoothbore.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the arc-boutant is a kind of a coastguardsman and planes gasp. | ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) | sent1: the Sunnite is not astomatous and douses regimentation. sent2: that something watches meclizine but it is not a Davy does not hold if it is not astomatous. sent3: the fact that something does plane gasp if it is a chlorofluorocarbon is true. sent4: that the arc-boutant does not watch half-century but it does douse kiaat does not hold. sent5: if that the arc-boutant does not watch half-century and douses kiaat does not hold then it is a coastguardsman. sent6: that the arc-boutant is a Borodin is correct. sent7: if the fact that the Romeo watches asphodel is not right the flugelhorn is a Borodin and/or is a kind of a chlorofluorocarbon. sent8: the dasyurid douses kiaat if the arc-boutant planes gasp or is not a coastguardsman or both. sent9: that the arc-boutant is a kind of a coastguardsman and does plane gasp is wrong if the flugelhorn is not a Borodin. sent10: if that that the fact that the Sunnite watches meclizine but it is not a Davy hold is false is true the Romeo does not watch asphodel. | sent1: (¬{H}{d} & {I}{d}) sent2: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent3: (x): {D}x -> {A}x sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent6: {C}{a} sent7: ¬{E}{c} -> ({C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent8: ({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> {AB}{ci} sent9: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) sent10: ¬({G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the arc-boutant is a coastguardsman.;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{a};"
]
| that the arc-boutant is a coastguardsman and does plane gasp is false. | ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) | []
| 6 | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the arc-boutant is a kind of a coastguardsman and planes gasp. ; $context$ = sent1: the Sunnite is not astomatous and douses regimentation. sent2: that something watches meclizine but it is not a Davy does not hold if it is not astomatous. sent3: the fact that something does plane gasp if it is a chlorofluorocarbon is true. sent4: that the arc-boutant does not watch half-century but it does douse kiaat does not hold. sent5: if that the arc-boutant does not watch half-century and douses kiaat does not hold then it is a coastguardsman. sent6: that the arc-boutant is a Borodin is correct. sent7: if the fact that the Romeo watches asphodel is not right the flugelhorn is a Borodin and/or is a kind of a chlorofluorocarbon. sent8: the dasyurid douses kiaat if the arc-boutant planes gasp or is not a coastguardsman or both. sent9: that the arc-boutant is a kind of a coastguardsman and does plane gasp is wrong if the flugelhorn is not a Borodin. sent10: if that that the fact that the Sunnite watches meclizine but it is not a Davy hold is false is true the Romeo does not watch asphodel. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the arc-boutant is a coastguardsman.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the pseudophloem is a whorehouse. | {C}{b} | sent1: the pseudophloem douses workaholism. sent2: the broomcorn douses unseen if the pseudophloem does watch Waterloo. sent3: the broomcorn watches Waterloo. sent4: that everything does not swelter hold. sent5: the pseudophloem is a progress. sent6: the pseudophloem does douse con. sent7: The Waterloo watches broomcorn. sent8: if the pseudophloem watches Waterloo it douses unseen. sent9: the propeller watches Waterloo. sent10: the relaxant is a whorehouse. sent11: the shedder watches Waterloo. sent12: the broomcorn is a whorehouse. sent13: the broomcorn does douse unseen. sent14: the pseudophloem is a whorehouse if it does douse unseen. sent15: the Burgundy douses unseen. sent16: if the pseudophloem watches Waterloo then the broomcorn is a whorehouse. sent17: the fuzz is a whorehouse. | sent1: {DH}{b} sent2: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{E}x sent5: {FE}{b} sent6: {AN}{b} sent7: {AA}{aa} sent8: {A}{b} -> {B}{b} sent9: {A}{ii} sent10: {C}{da} sent11: {A}{he} sent12: {C}{a} sent13: {B}{a} sent14: {B}{b} -> {C}{b} sent15: {B}{cn} sent16: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent17: {C}{co} | []
| []
| the pseudophloem is not a kind of a whorehouse. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the broomcorn does not swelter.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pseudophloem is a whorehouse. ; $context$ = sent1: the pseudophloem douses workaholism. sent2: the broomcorn douses unseen if the pseudophloem does watch Waterloo. sent3: the broomcorn watches Waterloo. sent4: that everything does not swelter hold. sent5: the pseudophloem is a progress. sent6: the pseudophloem does douse con. sent7: The Waterloo watches broomcorn. sent8: if the pseudophloem watches Waterloo it douses unseen. sent9: the propeller watches Waterloo. sent10: the relaxant is a whorehouse. sent11: the shedder watches Waterloo. sent12: the broomcorn is a whorehouse. sent13: the broomcorn does douse unseen. sent14: the pseudophloem is a whorehouse if it does douse unseen. sent15: the Burgundy douses unseen. sent16: if the pseudophloem watches Waterloo then the broomcorn is a whorehouse. sent17: the fuzz is a whorehouse. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the bishopry does not occur and the extralinguisticness happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: both the outlet and the euchre happens. sent2: that the watching Erlang occurs and the euchre occurs is triggered by that the planing buttercup does not occur. sent3: the PIN does not occur. sent4: that the planing call occurs and the orthopedicness does not occur causes that the planing buttercup does not occur. | sent1: ({B} & {A}) sent2: ¬{D} -> ({GD} & {A}) sent3: ¬{HA} sent4: ({F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bishopry does not occur but the extralinguisticness occurs is incorrect.; sent1 -> int1: the outlet happens.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent1 -> int1: {B};"
]
| both the watching Erlang and the relinquishment occurs. | ({GD} & {DE}) | []
| 5 | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bishopry does not occur and the extralinguisticness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the outlet and the euchre happens. sent2: that the watching Erlang occurs and the euchre occurs is triggered by that the planing buttercup does not occur. sent3: the PIN does not occur. sent4: that the planing call occurs and the orthopedicness does not occur causes that the planing buttercup does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bishopry does not occur but the extralinguisticness occurs is incorrect.; sent1 -> int1: the outlet happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the spall is a chelonian. | {B}{b} | sent1: The restfulness saps weakener. sent2: something saps restfulness if it does not douse utilization and it is a chelonian. sent3: the weakener is not a kind of a chelonian if the fact that the spall saps restfulness but it is not a bluefish hold. sent4: the weakener saps restfulness. sent5: if the spall is not a chelonian but it saps restfulness then the weakener is not a prolapse. sent6: the weakener does not plane cod. sent7: the spall is not a kind of a chelonian if the weakener is not a bluefish and it is not a prolapse. sent8: if the fact that the weakener saps restfulness is true then it is both not a bluefish and not a prolapse. | sent1: {AC}{aa} sent2: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> {A}x sent3: ({A}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: (¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent6: ¬{IU}{a} sent7: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent8: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the weakener is not a bluefish and it does not prolapse.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 & sent4 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the litterbin saps restfulness. | {A}{gk} | [
"sent2 -> int2: if that the litterbin does not douse utilization and is chelonian is not incorrect then it saps restfulness.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the spall is a chelonian. ; $context$ = sent1: The restfulness saps weakener. sent2: something saps restfulness if it does not douse utilization and it is a chelonian. sent3: the weakener is not a kind of a chelonian if the fact that the spall saps restfulness but it is not a bluefish hold. sent4: the weakener saps restfulness. sent5: if the spall is not a chelonian but it saps restfulness then the weakener is not a prolapse. sent6: the weakener does not plane cod. sent7: the spall is not a kind of a chelonian if the weakener is not a bluefish and it is not a prolapse. sent8: if the fact that the weakener saps restfulness is true then it is both not a bluefish and not a prolapse. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the weakener is not a bluefish and it does not prolapse.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | both the unorthodoxness and the dousing shahadah happens. | ({B} & {C}) | sent1: if the iridaceousness does not occur then the management happens. sent2: the iridaceousness happens. sent3: the e-commerce and the dousing scripted occurs. sent4: the acidoticness and the tail occurs. sent5: the exodonticness happens. sent6: the iridaceousness occurs and the unorthodoxness happens. sent7: the adulteration happens. sent8: the irreverentness and the dousing silkgrass occurs. sent9: the watching gidgee occurs. sent10: the dousing biochip occurs. sent11: that the unorthodoxness and the dousing shahadah happens is not true if the iridaceousness does not occur. sent12: the watching ersatz happens. sent13: the dousing fabrication happens. sent14: the fact that the cannonading happens hold if the fact that the planing detox occurs is right. sent15: if the experimentalness occurs then not the dousing fabrication but the radiography happens. sent16: the experimentalness happens if the cannonade occurs. sent17: the iridaceousness does not occur if the iridaceousness does not occur or the dousing fabrication does not occur or both. sent18: both the fishing and the adulteration occurs. | sent1: ¬{A} -> {AQ} sent2: {A} sent3: ({CN} & {BS}) sent4: ({HM} & {BK}) sent5: {DF} sent6: ({A} & {B}) sent7: {HJ} sent8: ({BQ} & {CS}) sent9: {AG} sent10: {IA} sent11: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) sent12: {ES} sent13: {D} sent14: {H} -> {G} sent15: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) sent16: {G} -> {F} sent17: (¬{A} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{A} sent18: ({CD} & {HJ}) | [
"sent6 -> int1: the unorthodoxness happens.;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> int1: {B};"
]
| the management occurs. | {AQ} | []
| 6 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the unorthodoxness and the dousing shahadah happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the iridaceousness does not occur then the management happens. sent2: the iridaceousness happens. sent3: the e-commerce and the dousing scripted occurs. sent4: the acidoticness and the tail occurs. sent5: the exodonticness happens. sent6: the iridaceousness occurs and the unorthodoxness happens. sent7: the adulteration happens. sent8: the irreverentness and the dousing silkgrass occurs. sent9: the watching gidgee occurs. sent10: the dousing biochip occurs. sent11: that the unorthodoxness and the dousing shahadah happens is not true if the iridaceousness does not occur. sent12: the watching ersatz happens. sent13: the dousing fabrication happens. sent14: the fact that the cannonading happens hold if the fact that the planing detox occurs is right. sent15: if the experimentalness occurs then not the dousing fabrication but the radiography happens. sent16: the experimentalness happens if the cannonade occurs. sent17: the iridaceousness does not occur if the iridaceousness does not occur or the dousing fabrication does not occur or both. sent18: both the fishing and the adulteration occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: the unorthodoxness happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the osteophyte is not progestational. | ¬{A}{b} | sent1: the fact that the scintillation does sap valvule and does not douse novelty is right. sent2: the beryllium is not progestational if the scintillation is progestational. sent3: the osteophyte is irresistible if the scintillation does sap valvule but it does not douse novelty. sent4: the gloxinia is not progestational. sent5: that the valvule does douse novelty does not hold. sent6: if the scintillation saps valvule and douses novelty the osteophyte is irresistible. sent7: something is not non-progestational and it is irresistible if it is not a kind of a Klaproth. sent8: if something is not progestational it douses novelty and does not plane kiaat. sent9: the scintillation does not douse novelty. sent10: if something is irresistible then it is not progestational. | sent1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: {A}{a} -> ¬{A}{jf} sent3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent4: ¬{A}{ep} sent5: ¬{AB}{cg} sent6: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AB}x & ¬{FA}x) sent9: ¬{AB}{a} sent10: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the osteophyte is irresistible.; sent10 -> int2: if the osteophyte is irresistible the fact that it is not progestational is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent10 -> int2: {B}{b} -> ¬{A}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the beryllium douses novelty and does not plane kiaat. | ({AB}{jf} & ¬{FA}{jf}) | [
"sent8 -> int3: the beryllium douses novelty and does not plane kiaat if it is not progestational.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the osteophyte is not progestational. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the scintillation does sap valvule and does not douse novelty is right. sent2: the beryllium is not progestational if the scintillation is progestational. sent3: the osteophyte is irresistible if the scintillation does sap valvule but it does not douse novelty. sent4: the gloxinia is not progestational. sent5: that the valvule does douse novelty does not hold. sent6: if the scintillation saps valvule and douses novelty the osteophyte is irresistible. sent7: something is not non-progestational and it is irresistible if it is not a kind of a Klaproth. sent8: if something is not progestational it douses novelty and does not plane kiaat. sent9: the scintillation does not douse novelty. sent10: if something is irresistible then it is not progestational. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the osteophyte is irresistible.; sent10 -> int2: if the osteophyte is irresistible the fact that it is not progestational is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is not right. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: that the sardonyx is not pneumonic and is not amphitheatric is not true. sent2: that something does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is not correct if it watches nymph. sent3: the sardonyx is actinomycetal. sent4: that the halo is a kind of non-actinomycetal thing that watches faller is not true if there is something such that it is unpropitious. sent5: if the fact that the halo is not actinomycetal but it does watch faller is wrong the nymph is not actinomycetal. sent6: the sardonyx does watch nymph if it is actinomycetal. sent7: the fact that the sardonyx does not watch technique and is not a aldosterone does not hold. sent8: the pinche douses agnathan. sent9: if the nymph is not actinomycetal then that it is inoffensive thing that does watch nymph is wrong. sent10: if the sardonyx is a microbiology then that it is not amphitheatric and it is a tactility is not right. sent11: that the sardonyx is erythropoietic and not conclusive is not right. sent12: if the pinche douses agnathan then it is a kind of a transept. sent13: if the ventilator is not a kind of a packsaddle then the novice douses councillor but it is not propitious. sent14: the ventilator is not a packsaddle if that something is a transept is true. sent15: something does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric if it does not watch nymph. | sent1: ¬(¬{ER}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: {B}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent5: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent6: {B}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{BP}{aa}) sent8: {I}{e} sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) sent10: {CB}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {BJ}{aa}) sent11: ¬({BD}{aa} & ¬{BH}{aa}) sent12: {I}{e} -> {H}{e} sent13: ¬{G}{d} -> ({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent14: (x): {H}x -> ¬{G}{d} sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is false if it watches nymph.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the sardonyx does watch nymph.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent6 & sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric hold. | (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent15 -> int3: the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric if it does not watch nymph.; sent12 & sent8 -> int4: that the pinche is a transept is right.; int4 -> int5: something is a transept.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the ventilator is not a kind of a packsaddle.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: the novice douses councillor and is not propitious.; int7 -> int8: the novice is not propitious.; int8 -> int9: something is not propitious.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the halo is not actinomycetal but it does watch faller is not true.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the nymph is not actinomycetal.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: that the nymph is inoffensive thing that watches nymph is not true.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that that it is inoffensive and it watches nymph is not true.;"
]
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sardonyx is not pneumonic and is not amphitheatric is not true. sent2: that something does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is not correct if it watches nymph. sent3: the sardonyx is actinomycetal. sent4: that the halo is a kind of non-actinomycetal thing that watches faller is not true if there is something such that it is unpropitious. sent5: if the fact that the halo is not actinomycetal but it does watch faller is wrong the nymph is not actinomycetal. sent6: the sardonyx does watch nymph if it is actinomycetal. sent7: the fact that the sardonyx does not watch technique and is not a aldosterone does not hold. sent8: the pinche douses agnathan. sent9: if the nymph is not actinomycetal then that it is inoffensive thing that does watch nymph is wrong. sent10: if the sardonyx is a microbiology then that it is not amphitheatric and it is a tactility is not right. sent11: that the sardonyx is erythropoietic and not conclusive is not right. sent12: if the pinche douses agnathan then it is a kind of a transept. sent13: if the ventilator is not a kind of a packsaddle then the novice douses councillor but it is not propitious. sent14: the ventilator is not a packsaddle if that something is a transept is true. sent15: something does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric if it does not watch nymph. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: that the sardonyx does not watch technique and it is not amphitheatric is false if it watches nymph.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the sardonyx does watch nymph.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the sapping submariner happens and the dousing skua occurs. | ({D} & {C}) | sent1: the fact that the opportuneness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that the infantilism does not occur hold. sent3: the fact that the baying happens but the planing ethologist does not occur is false. sent4: if the traversal occurs the inadequateness happens. sent5: the undulatoriness does not occur if the inadequateness happens. sent6: the dousing skua happens if the fact that the campaigning happens is not incorrect. sent7: the lupine occurs. sent8: that the lupine happens is brought about by that the transuranicness happens. sent9: the bacteroidalness does not occur if both the non-undulatoryness and the non-extantness occurs. sent10: the campaigning occurs if the imitativeness happens. sent11: the unmanageableness does not occur if the fact that the comprehensive does not occur and the avenue does not occur is not right. sent12: the backstroke or the traversal or both happens. sent13: if the lupineness does not occur not the campaigning but the imitativeness occurs. sent14: not the opportuneness but the perception happens if the nonmechanicalness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the opportuneness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is not right then the transuranicness does not occur. sent16: if the campaigning does not occur the fact that both the sapping submariner and the dousing skua occurs does not hold. sent17: that the extantness does not occur hold if the extantnessness and/or the undulation occurs. sent18: that the baying occurs and the planing ethologist occurs is wrong. sent19: if the planing ethologist happens then the imitativeness occurs. sent20: if that the opportuneness happens hold then the transuranicness does not occur. sent21: the inadequateness occurs if the backstroking happens. sent22: that the opportuneness but not the telefilm happens is not true. sent23: that the lupineness occurs is not incorrect if the transuranicness does not occur. sent24: if the transuranicness does not occur then both the sapping submariner and the lupineness occurs. sent25: the planing swatter does not occur and the nonmechanicalness does not occur if the fact that the bacteroidalness does not occur is not incorrect. | sent1: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{G}) sent2: ¬{CH} sent3: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: {P} -> {O} sent5: {O} -> ¬{N} sent6: {A} -> {C} sent7: {E} sent8: {F} -> {E} sent9: (¬{N} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} sent10: {B} -> {A} sent11: ¬(¬{AU} & ¬{FG}) -> ¬{AG} sent12: ({Q} v {P}) sent13: ¬{E} -> (¬{A} & {B}) sent14: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) sent15: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} sent16: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & {C}) sent17: (¬{M} v {R}) -> ¬{M} sent18: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent19: {AB} -> {B} sent20: {H} -> ¬{F} sent21: {Q} -> {O} sent22: ¬({H} & ¬{G}) sent23: ¬{F} -> {E} sent24: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent25: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) | [
"sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the transuranicness does not occur.; sent24 & int1 -> int2: both the sapping submariner and the lupine occurs.; int2 -> int3: the sapping submariner happens.;"
]
| [
"sent15 & sent1 -> int1: ¬{F}; sent24 & int1 -> int2: ({D} & {E}); int2 -> int3: {D};"
]
| the fact that both the sapping submariner and the dousing skua occurs is not right. | ¬({D} & {C}) | [
"sent12 & sent21 & sent4 -> int4: that the inadequateness occurs hold.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the undulatoriness does not occur.;"
]
| 13 | 4 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the sapping submariner happens and the dousing skua occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the opportuneness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is incorrect. sent2: that the infantilism does not occur hold. sent3: the fact that the baying happens but the planing ethologist does not occur is false. sent4: if the traversal occurs the inadequateness happens. sent5: the undulatoriness does not occur if the inadequateness happens. sent6: the dousing skua happens if the fact that the campaigning happens is not incorrect. sent7: the lupine occurs. sent8: that the lupine happens is brought about by that the transuranicness happens. sent9: the bacteroidalness does not occur if both the non-undulatoryness and the non-extantness occurs. sent10: the campaigning occurs if the imitativeness happens. sent11: the unmanageableness does not occur if the fact that the comprehensive does not occur and the avenue does not occur is not right. sent12: the backstroke or the traversal or both happens. sent13: if the lupineness does not occur not the campaigning but the imitativeness occurs. sent14: not the opportuneness but the perception happens if the nonmechanicalness does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the opportuneness does not occur and the telefilm does not occur is not right then the transuranicness does not occur. sent16: if the campaigning does not occur the fact that both the sapping submariner and the dousing skua occurs does not hold. sent17: that the extantness does not occur hold if the extantnessness and/or the undulation occurs. sent18: that the baying occurs and the planing ethologist occurs is wrong. sent19: if the planing ethologist happens then the imitativeness occurs. sent20: if that the opportuneness happens hold then the transuranicness does not occur. sent21: the inadequateness occurs if the backstroking happens. sent22: that the opportuneness but not the telefilm happens is not true. sent23: that the lupineness occurs is not incorrect if the transuranicness does not occur. sent24: if the transuranicness does not occur then both the sapping submariner and the lupineness occurs. sent25: the planing swatter does not occur and the nonmechanicalness does not occur if the fact that the bacteroidalness does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the transuranicness does not occur.; sent24 & int1 -> int2: both the sapping submariner and the lupine occurs.; int2 -> int3: the sapping submariner happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the arbutus is not a kind of a converter. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: everything is unsteady and does watch resorption. sent2: something that is not a kind of a hopscotch does watch resorption and is unsteady. sent3: the trouser is not democratic. sent4: if the trouser is undemocratic then the viomycin does hand but it is not morphologic. sent5: if the viomycin is both a hands and not morphologic the resorption is not a hopscotch. sent6: the cubist is not exteroceptive. sent7: the fact that the trouser is a converter hold. sent8: if the arbutus is a kind of a converter it is a Genevan. sent9: that if there exists something such that it does watch resorption then that the mulberry is not a Genevan is not false is true. sent10: the arbutus is not a Genevan if the cubist is not exteroceptive. | sent1: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent3: ¬{I}{e} sent4: ¬{I}{e} -> ({G}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) sent5: ({G}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent6: ¬{C}{b} sent7: {A}{e} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}{fh} sent10: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arbutus is a converter.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the arbutus is a kind of a Genevan.; sent10 & sent6 -> int2: the arbutus is not a Genevan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent10 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the arbutus is a converter. | {A}{a} | [
"sent2 -> int4: if the resorption is not a kind of a hopscotch it does watch resorption and it is unsteady.; sent4 & sent3 -> int5: the viomycin is a hands but it is not morphologic.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the resorption is not a hopscotch.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the resorption does watch resorption and is unsteady.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it does watch resorption and it is unsteady is true.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the arbutus is not a kind of a converter. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is unsteady and does watch resorption. sent2: something that is not a kind of a hopscotch does watch resorption and is unsteady. sent3: the trouser is not democratic. sent4: if the trouser is undemocratic then the viomycin does hand but it is not morphologic. sent5: if the viomycin is both a hands and not morphologic the resorption is not a hopscotch. sent6: the cubist is not exteroceptive. sent7: the fact that the trouser is a converter hold. sent8: if the arbutus is a kind of a converter it is a Genevan. sent9: that if there exists something such that it does watch resorption then that the mulberry is not a Genevan is not false is true. sent10: the arbutus is not a Genevan if the cubist is not exteroceptive. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arbutus is a converter.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the arbutus is a kind of a Genevan.; sent10 & sent6 -> int2: the arbutus is not a Genevan.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the womanhood happens and/or the maternalism does not occur. | ({B} v ¬{C}) | sent1: the womanhood happens if the fact that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the planing biochip happens the fact that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the planing biochip occurs. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: {A} | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the womanhood occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & sent1 -> int2: {B}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the womanhood happens and/or the maternalism does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the womanhood happens if the fact that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur does not hold. sent2: if the planing biochip happens the fact that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the planing biochip occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent3 -> int1: that the Incanness does not occur and the pogrom does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the womanhood occurs.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the headset is a kind of an arrogance and it is allergenic. | ({D}{c} & {E}{c}) | sent1: the fact that the gander is hemolytic is not incorrect if the headset is a minaret. sent2: the headset is nonaddictive. sent3: the amperage is allergenic if the headset douses Lyly. sent4: something is a facelift if it does douse Lyly. sent5: if the headset is hemolytic it is a minaret. sent6: the amperage douses Lyly if it is a kind of a facelift. sent7: if there exists something such that it is underage then the fact that either the headset is hemolytic or it douses in-law or both is not wrong. sent8: the gander is allergenic. sent9: that the gander is hemolytic is not incorrect. sent10: the gander is a kind of aesthetics a heaves. sent11: the headset douses Lyly. sent12: there is something such that it is underage. sent13: the gander is a kind of a minaret if the amperage douses Lyly. sent14: the headset is a firebox. sent15: the gander is either a minaret or allergenic or both if there is something such that it is hemolytic. sent16: the headset is a facelift. sent17: the sensitizer is an arrogance and/or it is unlikely. sent18: the gander is a kind of an arrogance. sent19: the doliolum douses Lyly and it is a minaret if the amperage is not an arrogance. sent20: either the gander is a facelift or it does douse in-law or both if there is something such that it is a minaret. sent21: if the headset does douse in-law then it is allergenic. sent22: that the amperage is a minaret is not false. sent23: that the headset is an arrogance is not incorrect if the gander is a minaret. sent24: the headset does douse Lyly if the amperage is allergenic. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it is an arrogance is true. sent26: the headset is allergenic if it is hemolytic. | sent1: {C}{c} -> {F}{b} sent2: {J}{c} sent3: {B}{c} -> {E}{a} sent4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent5: {F}{c} -> {C}{c} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): {H}x -> ({F}{c} v {G}{c}) sent8: {E}{b} sent9: {F}{b} sent10: ({BL}{b} & {AO}{b}) sent11: {B}{c} sent12: (Ex): {H}x sent13: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent14: {DC}{c} sent15: (x): {F}x -> ({C}{b} v {E}{b}) sent16: {A}{c} sent17: ({D}{ft} v {DG}{ft}) sent18: {D}{b} sent19: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{fh} & {C}{fh}) sent20: (x): {C}x -> ({A}{b} v {G}{b}) sent21: {G}{c} -> {E}{c} sent22: {C}{a} sent23: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} sent24: {E}{a} -> {B}{c} sent25: (Ex): {D}x sent26: {F}{c} -> {E}{c} | [
"sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the headset is hemolytic and/or douses in-law.; int1 & sent26 & sent21 -> int2: the headset is not non-allergenic.;"
]
| [
"sent12 & sent7 -> int1: ({F}{c} v {G}{c}); int1 & sent26 & sent21 -> int2: {E}{c};"
]
| the doliolum is a kind of a facelift. | {A}{fh} | [
"sent4 -> int3: if the doliolum douses Lyly then it is a kind of a facelift.;"
]
| 5 | 4 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the headset is a kind of an arrogance and it is allergenic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gander is hemolytic is not incorrect if the headset is a minaret. sent2: the headset is nonaddictive. sent3: the amperage is allergenic if the headset douses Lyly. sent4: something is a facelift if it does douse Lyly. sent5: if the headset is hemolytic it is a minaret. sent6: the amperage douses Lyly if it is a kind of a facelift. sent7: if there exists something such that it is underage then the fact that either the headset is hemolytic or it douses in-law or both is not wrong. sent8: the gander is allergenic. sent9: that the gander is hemolytic is not incorrect. sent10: the gander is a kind of aesthetics a heaves. sent11: the headset douses Lyly. sent12: there is something such that it is underage. sent13: the gander is a kind of a minaret if the amperage douses Lyly. sent14: the headset is a firebox. sent15: the gander is either a minaret or allergenic or both if there is something such that it is hemolytic. sent16: the headset is a facelift. sent17: the sensitizer is an arrogance and/or it is unlikely. sent18: the gander is a kind of an arrogance. sent19: the doliolum douses Lyly and it is a minaret if the amperage is not an arrogance. sent20: either the gander is a facelift or it does douse in-law or both if there is something such that it is a minaret. sent21: if the headset does douse in-law then it is allergenic. sent22: that the amperage is a minaret is not false. sent23: that the headset is an arrogance is not incorrect if the gander is a minaret. sent24: the headset does douse Lyly if the amperage is allergenic. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it is an arrogance is true. sent26: the headset is allergenic if it is hemolytic. ; $proof$ = | sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the headset is hemolytic and/or douses in-law.; int1 & sent26 & sent21 -> int2: the headset is not non-allergenic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the formulation occurs. | {E} | sent1: the watching forties does not occur and the burglariousness happens. sent2: either the napoleon or the non-experientialness or both prevents that the formulation does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Skinnerian occurs is not false if the locking happens. sent4: the non-terrestrialness and the watching throne occurs. sent5: the cytoplasticness occurs if the planing slingback occurs and/or the peek does not occur. sent6: the fact that the infection happens and/or the X-ray does not occur is not false if the downpour happens. sent7: if either the molalness or the non-entozoicness or both occurs the plunge happens. sent8: if the burglariousness occurs then the napoleon occurs and/or the experientialness does not occur. | sent1: (¬{A} & {B}) sent2: ({D} v ¬{C}) -> {E} sent3: {EQ} -> {GP} sent4: (¬{CH} & {GS}) sent5: ({JJ} v ¬{HK}) -> {IA} sent6: {BU} -> ({FC} v ¬{CB}) sent7: ({IK} v ¬{EF}) -> {EP} sent8: {B} -> ({D} v ¬{C}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the burglariousness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: either the napoleon or the non-experientialness or both happens.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent8 -> int2: ({D} v ¬{C}); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the formulation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the watching forties does not occur and the burglariousness happens. sent2: either the napoleon or the non-experientialness or both prevents that the formulation does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Skinnerian occurs is not false if the locking happens. sent4: the non-terrestrialness and the watching throne occurs. sent5: the cytoplasticness occurs if the planing slingback occurs and/or the peek does not occur. sent6: the fact that the infection happens and/or the X-ray does not occur is not false if the downpour happens. sent7: if either the molalness or the non-entozoicness or both occurs the plunge happens. sent8: if the burglariousness occurs then the napoleon occurs and/or the experientialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the burglariousness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: either the napoleon or the non-experientialness or both happens.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it does plane Wynette the fact that it is diatomic and it is not outer is not correct. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: there is something such that if it does arrange the fact that it douses tout and is not a Konoe is not right. sent2: the arcella is both diatomic and not outer if it planes Wynette. sent3: there is something such that if it planes arcella then the fact that it is a charged and does not convulse is wrong. sent4: if the arcella is diatomic that it is prolate thing that does not declare is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it planes Wynette it is diatomic and it is not outer. sent6: there exists something such that if it planes pyromancy then it is a kind of a blastopore and it does not discontinue. sent7: there exists something such that if it does sap onrush then the fact that it does douse tout and it does not sap Illampu is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it does crown then the fact that it is a kind of a bourbon that is a kind of a gallop is wrong. sent9: that something is a kind of a XX that is not a protozoology is false if it is a kind of a putout. sent10: the fact that the arcella is diatomic and outer is false if it planes Wynette. sent11: there exists something such that if it is inboard then that the fact that it is a kind of a scald and does not plane irrigation is not incorrect is false. sent12: there exists something such that if it does plane Wynette then the fact that it is diatomic and it is outer is not correct. sent13: the fact that the arcella is diatomic and is not outer does not hold if it planes Wynette. sent14: there exists something such that if it does declare then that it does imbibe and it is a non-discrimination is incorrect. sent15: that something does scald but it does not plane Pindaric does not hold if it arranges. sent16: if something does watch wreath then that it does watch Benjamin and is not recreational is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if it scalds the fact that it is a Saroyan and is a shorts is incorrect. | sent1: (Ex): {AQ}x -> ¬({IJ}x & ¬{ET}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): {IH}x -> ¬({DU}x & ¬{CR}x) sent4: {AA}{aa} -> ¬({BD}{aa} & ¬{T}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (Ex): {BS}x -> ({DN}x & ¬{JI}x) sent7: (Ex): {AH}x -> ¬({IJ}x & ¬{II}x) sent8: (Ex): {EG}x -> ¬({IA}x & {JA}x) sent9: (x): {HK}x -> ¬({ID}x & ¬{CO}x) sent10: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent11: (Ex): {FP}x -> ¬({FC}x & ¬{FD}x) sent12: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent13: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): {T}x -> ¬({BT}x & {CG}x) sent15: (x): {AQ}x -> ¬({FC}x & ¬{AI}x) sent16: (x): {HN}x -> ¬({DF}x & ¬{B}x) sent17: (Ex): {FC}x -> ¬({CB}x & {CH}x) | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if it arranges then the fact that it is a scald and does not plane Pindaric does not hold. | (Ex): {AQ}x -> ¬({FC}x & ¬{AI}x) | [
"sent15 -> int1: if the griddlecake does arrange the fact that it is a scald and does not plane Pindaric is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does plane Wynette the fact that it is diatomic and it is not outer is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does arrange the fact that it douses tout and is not a Konoe is not right. sent2: the arcella is both diatomic and not outer if it planes Wynette. sent3: there is something such that if it planes arcella then the fact that it is a charged and does not convulse is wrong. sent4: if the arcella is diatomic that it is prolate thing that does not declare is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it planes Wynette it is diatomic and it is not outer. sent6: there exists something such that if it planes pyromancy then it is a kind of a blastopore and it does not discontinue. sent7: there exists something such that if it does sap onrush then the fact that it does douse tout and it does not sap Illampu is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it does crown then the fact that it is a kind of a bourbon that is a kind of a gallop is wrong. sent9: that something is a kind of a XX that is not a protozoology is false if it is a kind of a putout. sent10: the fact that the arcella is diatomic and outer is false if it planes Wynette. sent11: there exists something such that if it is inboard then that the fact that it is a kind of a scald and does not plane irrigation is not incorrect is false. sent12: there exists something such that if it does plane Wynette then the fact that it is diatomic and it is outer is not correct. sent13: the fact that the arcella is diatomic and is not outer does not hold if it planes Wynette. sent14: there exists something such that if it does declare then that it does imbibe and it is a non-discrimination is incorrect. sent15: that something does scald but it does not plane Pindaric does not hold if it arranges. sent16: if something does watch wreath then that it does watch Benjamin and is not recreational is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that if it scalds the fact that it is a Saroyan and is a shorts is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the tristearin does plane violin. | {B}{a} | sent1: something is not a Gonne if it is not a echocardiograph. sent2: if the fact that the luncher is not teratogenic but it is a echocardiograph does not hold it is not a Gonne. sent3: something does not watch tristearin if it is not a Gonne. sent4: something is a kind of a Alar but it does not watch tristearin if the fact that it is not a Gonne is right. sent5: the fact that the luncher is not teratogenic but it is a kind of a echocardiograph does not hold. sent6: the tristearin does plane violin if the luncher is a Alar but it does not watch tristearin. sent7: something that is not a Gonne either does not plane violin or is not teratogenic or both. sent8: if the tristearin planes violin but it is non-teratogenic then the luncher is a Gonne. sent9: something does not plane violin if the fact that it either does not plane violin or is not teratogenic or both hold. sent10: if the formalwear is not a bore it is an epoch and it does douse habitation. | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{A}x sent2: ¬(¬{C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent5: ¬(¬{C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) sent6: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) sent8: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{aa} sent9: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent10: ¬{G}{b} -> ({E}{b} & {F}{b}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the luncher is not a Gonne then it is a Alar and does not watch tristearin.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the luncher is not a Gonne.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the luncher is a kind of a Alar and does not watch tristearin.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent5 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the tristearin does not plane violin. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent9 -> int4: if the tristearin does not plane violin or it is not teratogenic or both it does not plane violin.; sent7 -> int5: the tristearin does not plane violin or it is not teratogenic or both if it is not a kind of a Gonne.; sent1 -> int6: if the tristearin is not a kind of a echocardiograph then it is not a Gonne.;"
]
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the tristearin does plane violin. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a Gonne if it is not a echocardiograph. sent2: if the fact that the luncher is not teratogenic but it is a echocardiograph does not hold it is not a Gonne. sent3: something does not watch tristearin if it is not a Gonne. sent4: something is a kind of a Alar but it does not watch tristearin if the fact that it is not a Gonne is right. sent5: the fact that the luncher is not teratogenic but it is a kind of a echocardiograph does not hold. sent6: the tristearin does plane violin if the luncher is a Alar but it does not watch tristearin. sent7: something that is not a Gonne either does not plane violin or is not teratogenic or both. sent8: if the tristearin planes violin but it is non-teratogenic then the luncher is a Gonne. sent9: something does not plane violin if the fact that it either does not plane violin or is not teratogenic or both hold. sent10: if the formalwear is not a bore it is an epoch and it does douse habitation. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: if the luncher is not a Gonne then it is a Alar and does not watch tristearin.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the luncher is not a Gonne.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the luncher is a kind of a Alar and does not watch tristearin.; int3 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is a corchorus and it is not a CAD it is not a choke. | (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: the derv does not choke if it is a corchorus and a CAD. sent2: if the postulant is an insult but it does not douse Nicotiana the fact that it is a corchorus hold. sent3: the mescal is not a kind of a eutectic if it is a stacte and does not watch tansy. sent4: if the derv is a corchorus but it is not a CAD then it does not choke. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a corchorus and is not a CAD then it chokes. sent6: something is not a choke if it is a domesticity that is not a buteonine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a asphodel and it is not a stacte then it is not rich. sent8: something that does deflate and does not plane anticyclone is not a kind of a corchorus. sent9: if the derv is a corchorus but it is not a CAD then it is a choke. sent10: there exists something such that if it does plane anticyclone and it does not pipe then it is a Lucas. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a corchorus and it is a kind of a CAD hold it does not choke. | sent1: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent2: ({FT}{e} & ¬{GT}{e}) -> {AA}{e} sent3: ({BP}{dp} & ¬{FF}{dp}) -> ¬{CI}{dp} sent4: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): ({IR}x & ¬{HJ}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: (Ex): ({GQ}x & ¬{BP}x) -> ¬{FJ}x sent8: (x): ({BE}x & ¬{GU}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent9: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({GU}x & ¬{AJ}x) -> {IO}x sent11: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the anticyclone is not a corchorus if it deflates and does not plane anticyclone. | ({BE}{ej} & ¬{GU}{ej}) -> ¬{AA}{ej} | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a corchorus and it is not a CAD it is not a choke. ; $context$ = sent1: the derv does not choke if it is a corchorus and a CAD. sent2: if the postulant is an insult but it does not douse Nicotiana the fact that it is a corchorus hold. sent3: the mescal is not a kind of a eutectic if it is a stacte and does not watch tansy. sent4: if the derv is a corchorus but it is not a CAD then it does not choke. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a corchorus and is not a CAD then it chokes. sent6: something is not a choke if it is a domesticity that is not a buteonine. sent7: there is something such that if it is a asphodel and it is not a stacte then it is not rich. sent8: something that does deflate and does not plane anticyclone is not a kind of a corchorus. sent9: if the derv is a corchorus but it is not a CAD then it is a choke. sent10: there exists something such that if it does plane anticyclone and it does not pipe then it is a Lucas. sent11: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a corchorus and it is a kind of a CAD hold it does not choke. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if that it is both prosthodontics and not a statics does not hold it does not watch self-heal. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: if that something is not sugary and not a coralwood is wrong that it does not plane padrone is right. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is both prosthodontics and a statics is incorrect it does not watch self-heal. sent3: if the fact that the ratter is a kind of prosthodontics thing that is not a statics does not hold it does not watch self-heal. sent4: if the fact that the mainsail does not scratch is not incorrect it is not prosthodontics. sent5: if the fact that the ratter is prosthodontics and it is a statics is not true it does not watch self-heal. sent6: if the fact that the barrette is a statics and does not sap Albuquerque is not correct then it does not reflect. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is both prosthodontics and not statics is true then the fact that it does not watch self-heal is true. sent8: the fact that if the ratter does not watch self-heal the ratter is not a kind of a fitting is correct. sent9: if the fact that something does watch dialogue but it is not three-wheel is not true it is not a curved. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is prosthodontics but not statics is not correct it watches self-heal. | sent1: (x): ¬({FB}x & ¬{JD}x) -> ¬{EL}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: ¬{AG}{ct} -> ¬{AA}{ct} sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: ¬({AB}{jj} & ¬{BA}{jj}) -> ¬{AO}{jj} sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{JA}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬({IU}x & ¬{CO}x) -> ¬{EI}x sent10: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if that it is sugarless and not a coralwood is false it does not plane padrone. | (Ex): ¬({FB}x & ¬{JD}x) -> ¬{EL}x | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the padrone is sugarless but not a coralwood is incorrect then it does not plane padrone.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is both prosthodontics and not a statics does not hold it does not watch self-heal. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not sugary and not a coralwood is wrong that it does not plane padrone is right. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is both prosthodontics and a statics is incorrect it does not watch self-heal. sent3: if the fact that the ratter is a kind of prosthodontics thing that is not a statics does not hold it does not watch self-heal. sent4: if the fact that the mainsail does not scratch is not incorrect it is not prosthodontics. sent5: if the fact that the ratter is prosthodontics and it is a statics is not true it does not watch self-heal. sent6: if the fact that the barrette is a statics and does not sap Albuquerque is not correct then it does not reflect. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is both prosthodontics and not statics is true then the fact that it does not watch self-heal is true. sent8: the fact that if the ratter does not watch self-heal the ratter is not a kind of a fitting is correct. sent9: if the fact that something does watch dialogue but it is not three-wheel is not true it is not a curved. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is prosthodontics but not statics is not correct it watches self-heal. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the antipruritic does not watch quira. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: the antipruritic does watch quira if the Oscan does not sight. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is catadromous and/or it is not a virility hold is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that either it is not catadromous or it is not a virility or both is incorrect then the Oscan does not watch quira. sent4: if the flipper is a kind of a tux but it is not a esthetician the Oscan is a kind of a esthetician. sent5: the antipruritic is a kind of a virility. sent6: if a esthetician is a kind of a Soleidae it is not a sight. sent7: the antipruritic does not watch quira if there is something such that that it is not catadromous and/or is a virility does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is a virility is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the Oscan is not a anil and/or it does not plane chandlery does not hold. sent10: the hatchery is stemmatic and it is a ridge. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a virility and/or it does not watch quira does not hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a Bohemia and/or does not forbid is not correct. sent13: either something is not catadromous or it is not a virility or both. sent14: the antipruritic does not watch quira if there exists something such that the fact that it is not catadromous and/or it is not a kind of a virility is incorrect. sent15: that the Oscan is not a virility and/or it does not sight is incorrect if it watches quira. sent16: if the Oscan is a kind of a sight then it is a virility. sent17: if the antipruritic sights then that it either is not catadromous or does not watch quira or both is false. sent18: the flipper is both a tux and not a esthetician. sent19: the Oscan does not watch quira. sent20: the Oscan is a virility. sent21: if there is something such that it is stemmatic then the Oscan is stemmatic and/or it is a velodrome. sent22: the Oscan is a kind of a sight. | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ({H}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {D}{a} sent5: {AB}{b} sent6: (x): ({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent7: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent8: (Ex): {AB}x sent9: ¬(¬{EA}{a} v ¬{AC}{a}) sent10: ({F}{d} & {G}{d}) sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{AB}x v ¬{B}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{ER}x v ¬{GR}x) sent13: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent15: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) sent16: {A}{a} -> {AB}{a} sent17: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) sent18: ({H}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) sent19: ¬{B}{a} sent20: {AB}{a} sent21: (x): {F}x -> ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent22: {A}{a} | []
| []
| the antipruritic does watch quira. | {B}{b} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the Oscan is not a kind of a sight if it is a esthetician and a Soleidae.; sent4 & sent18 -> int2: the Oscan is a esthetician.; sent10 -> int3: the hatchery is stemmatic.; int3 -> int4: something is stemmatic.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: either the Oscan is stemmatic or it is a velodrome or both.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the antipruritic does not watch quira. ; $context$ = sent1: the antipruritic does watch quira if the Oscan does not sight. sent2: there is something such that the fact that that it is catadromous and/or it is not a virility hold is false. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that either it is not catadromous or it is not a virility or both is incorrect then the Oscan does not watch quira. sent4: if the flipper is a kind of a tux but it is not a esthetician the Oscan is a kind of a esthetician. sent5: the antipruritic is a kind of a virility. sent6: if a esthetician is a kind of a Soleidae it is not a sight. sent7: the antipruritic does not watch quira if there is something such that that it is not catadromous and/or is a virility does not hold. sent8: the fact that something is a virility is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the Oscan is not a anil and/or it does not plane chandlery does not hold. sent10: the hatchery is stemmatic and it is a ridge. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a virility and/or it does not watch quira does not hold. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a Bohemia and/or does not forbid is not correct. sent13: either something is not catadromous or it is not a virility or both. sent14: the antipruritic does not watch quira if there exists something such that the fact that it is not catadromous and/or it is not a kind of a virility is incorrect. sent15: that the Oscan is not a virility and/or it does not sight is incorrect if it watches quira. sent16: if the Oscan is a kind of a sight then it is a virility. sent17: if the antipruritic sights then that it either is not catadromous or does not watch quira or both is false. sent18: the flipper is both a tux and not a esthetician. sent19: the Oscan does not watch quira. sent20: the Oscan is a virility. sent21: if there is something such that it is stemmatic then the Oscan is stemmatic and/or it is a velodrome. sent22: the Oscan is a kind of a sight. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the planing 24/7 occurs and the planing Jinja happens. | ({A} & {B}) | sent1: the watching humility and the calcicness occurs. sent2: if the unwovenness occurs and the checkmate happens then the nonintellectualness does not occur. sent3: if the nonintellectualness does not occur that the intramuralness occurs but the Amharicness does not occur hold. sent4: both the planing 24/7 and the spectroscopicness occurs if the planing Jinja does not occur. sent5: the planing 24/7 occurs. sent6: the planing Jinja happens. sent7: if the consonantalness does not occur the fact that both the planing 24/7 and the planing Jinja occurs is not correct. sent8: the non-Amharicness and/or that the breast does not occur yields that the consonantalness does not occur. | sent1: ({EF} & {HR}) sent2: ({I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} sent3: ¬{G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {CP}) sent5: {A} sent6: {B} sent7: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) sent8: (¬{E} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} | [
"sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the planing 24/7 happens and the planing Jinja happens is not right. | ¬({A} & {B}) | []
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the planing 24/7 occurs and the planing Jinja happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the watching humility and the calcicness occurs. sent2: if the unwovenness occurs and the checkmate happens then the nonintellectualness does not occur. sent3: if the nonintellectualness does not occur that the intramuralness occurs but the Amharicness does not occur hold. sent4: both the planing 24/7 and the spectroscopicness occurs if the planing Jinja does not occur. sent5: the planing 24/7 occurs. sent6: the planing Jinja happens. sent7: if the consonantalness does not occur the fact that both the planing 24/7 and the planing Jinja occurs is not correct. sent8: the non-Amharicness and/or that the breast does not occur yields that the consonantalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an indigestion hold it is a manul and a disavowal. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: something is a manul that is a kind of a disavowal if it is not a kind of an indigestion. | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the dander is both a manul and a disavowal if it is not an indigestion.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an indigestion hold it is a manul and a disavowal. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a manul that is a kind of a disavowal if it is not a kind of an indigestion. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the dander is both a manul and a disavowal if it is not an indigestion.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the wassail is lengthwise. | {B}{aa} | sent1: the fact that the fact that that the wassail does not mourn but it is voyeuristic hold does not hold hold. sent2: the fact that the wassail does not mourn and is not voyeuristic is not right if it does plane celerity. sent3: if the father-in-law does watch lekvar the fact that it is a kind of a dalesman and is not a kind of a utilization is not correct. sent4: the override is not nonpasserine. sent5: that the supplement does watch wheatgrass and does plane celerity is incorrect if it is not a utilization. sent6: The celerity does plane wassail. sent7: if something is not lengthwise it is not nonpasserine. sent8: if something is nonpasserine and does not mourn it is not lengthwise. sent9: if the fagoting is an arroyo the father-in-law watches lekvar. sent10: something is a kind of nonpasserine thing that does not mourn if it is not non-voyeuristic. sent11: if that something does not mourn and is not voyeuristic is false it is not passerine. sent12: if the fact that the father-in-law is a dalesman but it is not a utilization does not hold then the supplement is not a utilization. | sent1: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {D}{aa}) sent2: {E}{aa} -> ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) sent3: {I}{b} -> ¬({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent4: ¬{C}{fr} sent5: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬({F}{a} & {E}{a}) sent6: {AA}{ab} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x sent8: (x): ({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent9: {J}{c} -> {I}{b} sent10: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x & ¬{A}x) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}x sent12: ¬({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> ¬{G}{a} | [
"sent7 -> int1: if the wassail is not lengthwise then it is passerine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wassail is not lengthwise.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wassail is not nonpasserine.; sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the wassail does not mourn and it is not voyeuristic is not correct then it is nonpasserine.;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; void -> assump1: ¬{B}{aa}; int1 & assump1 -> int2: ¬{C}{aa}; sent11 -> int3: ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) -> {C}{aa};"
]
| the wassail is not lengthwise. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"sent8 -> int4: the wassail is not lengthwise if it is nonpasserine and it does not mourn.; sent10 -> int5: the wassail is nonpasserine but it does not mourn if it is voyeuristic.;"
]
| 9 | 4 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the wassail is lengthwise. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that that the wassail does not mourn but it is voyeuristic hold does not hold hold. sent2: the fact that the wassail does not mourn and is not voyeuristic is not right if it does plane celerity. sent3: if the father-in-law does watch lekvar the fact that it is a kind of a dalesman and is not a kind of a utilization is not correct. sent4: the override is not nonpasserine. sent5: that the supplement does watch wheatgrass and does plane celerity is incorrect if it is not a utilization. sent6: The celerity does plane wassail. sent7: if something is not lengthwise it is not nonpasserine. sent8: if something is nonpasserine and does not mourn it is not lengthwise. sent9: if the fagoting is an arroyo the father-in-law watches lekvar. sent10: something is a kind of nonpasserine thing that does not mourn if it is not non-voyeuristic. sent11: if that something does not mourn and is not voyeuristic is false it is not passerine. sent12: if the fact that the father-in-law is a dalesman but it is not a utilization does not hold then the supplement is not a utilization. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: if the wassail is not lengthwise then it is passerine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wassail is not lengthwise.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wassail is not nonpasserine.; sent11 -> int3: if the fact that the wassail does not mourn and it is not voyeuristic is not correct then it is nonpasserine.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the epidiascope does not watch epidiascope. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: That the epidiascope watches epidiascope is right. sent2: the fact that the xeranthemum is not sepaloid but it is memberless is not correct. sent3: the haunt is sepaloid if there exists something such that that it is not sepaloid and it is memberless does not hold. sent4: something is not tubal if it is sepaloid and it does watch sector. sent5: if something is not tubal the fact that it is a conscription or it is not morphophonemics or both is not right. sent6: that the epidiascope watches epidiascope is right. sent7: if the haunt is a stacte it does watch sector. sent8: the epidiascope does not watch epidiascope if the helpmate does not watch openbill and it does not watch epidiascope. sent9: the Rhabdoviridae watches epidiascope. sent10: the bleachers does watch openbill if there is something such that it watches Khepera. sent11: the fact that the haunt is a stacte is right. sent12: the helpmate butters if the fact that the Spork does not retrograde does not hold. sent13: the epidiascope does douse arroyo if the helpmate butters. sent14: something watches Khepera if it does douse arroyo. sent15: the helpmate does watch Khepera if the fact that it does douse arroyo is right. sent16: if something does watch openbill it watches epidiascope. sent17: if that the haunt is a conscription or it is not morphophonemics or both does not hold the Spork retrogrades. | sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: ¬(¬{K}{e} & {L}{e}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {L}x) -> {K}{d} sent4: (x): ({K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{I}x sent5: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x v ¬{G}x) sent6: {A}{a} sent7: {M}{d} -> {J}{d} sent8: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent9: {A}{hk} sent10: (x): {C}x -> {B}{cp} sent11: {M}{d} sent12: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} sent13: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} sent14: (x): {D}x -> {C}x sent15: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} sent16: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent17: ¬({H}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) -> {F}{c} | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the epidiascope does not watch epidiascope. | ¬{A}{a} | []
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the epidiascope does not watch epidiascope. ; $context$ = sent1: That the epidiascope watches epidiascope is right. sent2: the fact that the xeranthemum is not sepaloid but it is memberless is not correct. sent3: the haunt is sepaloid if there exists something such that that it is not sepaloid and it is memberless does not hold. sent4: something is not tubal if it is sepaloid and it does watch sector. sent5: if something is not tubal the fact that it is a conscription or it is not morphophonemics or both is not right. sent6: that the epidiascope watches epidiascope is right. sent7: if the haunt is a stacte it does watch sector. sent8: the epidiascope does not watch epidiascope if the helpmate does not watch openbill and it does not watch epidiascope. sent9: the Rhabdoviridae watches epidiascope. sent10: the bleachers does watch openbill if there is something such that it watches Khepera. sent11: the fact that the haunt is a stacte is right. sent12: the helpmate butters if the fact that the Spork does not retrograde does not hold. sent13: the epidiascope does douse arroyo if the helpmate butters. sent14: something watches Khepera if it does douse arroyo. sent15: the helpmate does watch Khepera if the fact that it does douse arroyo is right. sent16: if something does watch openbill it watches epidiascope. sent17: if that the haunt is a conscription or it is not morphophonemics or both does not hold the Spork retrogrades. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Ottoman and it douses nymph does not hold. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: there exists something such that that it is both not a kinship and a touchline does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is not separate and does belly. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not benignant and it is a kind of a nosher does not hold. sent4: that the nymph is non-Ottoman thing that douses nymph is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a Ottoman that does douse nymph does not hold. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hymn and it is a Bell is incorrect. sent7: something is not a consulship and not a Oberson if it is oscine. sent8: if something is not a Oberson then that it does not douse nymph and it does belly is not correct. sent9: there is something such that it is not Ottoman and it douses nymph. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a domesticity and it does douse padrone is wrong. sent11: that the nymph is a kind of a Ottoman that does douse nymph is false. | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{CK}x & {IM}x) sent2: (Ex): (¬{CI}x & {GN}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬(¬{EQ}x & {BR}x) sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬(¬{IE}x & {HL}x) sent7: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & {GN}x) sent9: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{DP}x & {EI}x) sent11: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the padrone does not douse nymph but it does belly is false. | ¬(¬{AB}{ag} & {GN}{ag}) | [
"sent8 -> int1: if the fact that the padrone is not a Oberson hold that it does not douse nymph and is a kind of a bellied is wrong.; sent7 -> int2: the padrone is not a consulship and not a Oberson if it is oscine.;"
]
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Ottoman and it douses nymph does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is both not a kinship and a touchline does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is not separate and does belly. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not benignant and it is a kind of a nosher does not hold. sent4: that the nymph is non-Ottoman thing that douses nymph is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that that it is a Ottoman that does douse nymph does not hold. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is not a hymn and it is a Bell is incorrect. sent7: something is not a consulship and not a Oberson if it is oscine. sent8: if something is not a Oberson then that it does not douse nymph and it does belly is not correct. sent9: there is something such that it is not Ottoman and it douses nymph. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a domesticity and it does douse padrone is wrong. sent11: that the nymph is a kind of a Ottoman that does douse nymph is false. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the private does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the non-hypercatalecticness triggers that both the lockdown and the planing deuterium happens. sent2: that the comparableness occurs is true. sent3: that the ultraviolet happens or that the homogenization does not occur or both leads to that the ultraviolet occurs. sent4: the Easter occurs. sent5: if the administrativeness does not occur that the fix and the hypercatalecticness happens is not right. sent6: that the carelessness does not occur yields that both the comparableness and the private occurs. sent7: either the ultraviolet happens or the homogenization does not occur or both if the planing deuterium happens. sent8: both the subordinating and the comparableness happens if that the carelessness does not occur hold. sent9: the carelessness occurs. sent10: the ultraviolet brings about that the Lamarckianness does not occur and the surfeiting does not occur. sent11: if the comparableness and the carelessness happens then the private does not occur. sent12: if that both the fix and the hypercatalectic happens does not hold then the hypercatalectic does not occur. sent13: that the Easter occurs but the privateness does not occur is not correct if the surfeit does not occur. | sent1: ¬{K} -> ({J} & {I}) sent2: {A} sent3: ({G} v ¬{H}) -> {G} sent4: {D} sent5: ¬{M} -> ¬({L} & {K}) sent6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) sent7: {I} -> ({G} v ¬{H}) sent8: ¬{B} -> ({IP} & {A}) sent9: {B} sent10: {G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) sent11: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent12: ¬({L} & {K}) -> ¬{K} sent13: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & ¬{C}) | [
"sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the comparableness and the carelessness occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent9 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent11 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the subordinating occurs. | {IP} | []
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the private does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-hypercatalecticness triggers that both the lockdown and the planing deuterium happens. sent2: that the comparableness occurs is true. sent3: that the ultraviolet happens or that the homogenization does not occur or both leads to that the ultraviolet occurs. sent4: the Easter occurs. sent5: if the administrativeness does not occur that the fix and the hypercatalecticness happens is not right. sent6: that the carelessness does not occur yields that both the comparableness and the private occurs. sent7: either the ultraviolet happens or the homogenization does not occur or both if the planing deuterium happens. sent8: both the subordinating and the comparableness happens if that the carelessness does not occur hold. sent9: the carelessness occurs. sent10: the ultraviolet brings about that the Lamarckianness does not occur and the surfeiting does not occur. sent11: if the comparableness and the carelessness happens then the private does not occur. sent12: if that both the fix and the hypercatalectic happens does not hold then the hypercatalectic does not occur. sent13: that the Easter occurs but the privateness does not occur is not correct if the surfeit does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the comparableness and the carelessness occurs.; sent11 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the decrepitating does not occur but the erring happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the stocking does not occur. sent2: if the watching trade does not occur the fact that both the noneffervescentness and the submarine happens is not correct. sent3: that not the decrepitating but the erring happens is not right if the stocking does not occur. | sent1: ¬{A} sent2: ¬{IB} -> ¬(¬{DF} & {JC}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the decrepitating does not occur but the erring happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the stocking does not occur. sent2: if the watching trade does not occur the fact that both the noneffervescentness and the submarine happens is not correct. sent3: that not the decrepitating but the erring happens is not right if the stocking does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the Maltese happens is not wrong. | {D} | sent1: the meteorologicness occurs if that the meteorologicness does not occur and the oophorectomy does not occur is not true. sent2: if the incompressibleness does not occur the intermezzo and the unmilitariness occurs. sent3: if that the incompressibleness occurs is true then the dousing verdin occurs. sent4: the unmilitariness occurs. sent5: the incompressibleness is prevented by that not the dousing verdin but the meteorologicness happens. sent6: that the Maltese does not occur but the unmilitariness happens is triggered by the compressibleness. sent7: that the Malteseness does not occur is prevented by the dousing verdin. sent8: if the meteorologicness happens both the non-Malteseness and the dousing verdin happens. | sent1: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{G}) -> {E} sent2: ¬{B} -> ({BD} & {A}) sent3: {B} -> {C} sent4: {A} sent5: (¬{C} & {E}) -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{B} -> (¬{D} & {A}) sent7: {C} -> {D} sent8: {E} -> (¬{D} & {C}) | []
| []
| the Maltese does not occur. | ¬{D} | []
| 7 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the Maltese happens is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the meteorologicness occurs if that the meteorologicness does not occur and the oophorectomy does not occur is not true. sent2: if the incompressibleness does not occur the intermezzo and the unmilitariness occurs. sent3: if that the incompressibleness occurs is true then the dousing verdin occurs. sent4: the unmilitariness occurs. sent5: the incompressibleness is prevented by that not the dousing verdin but the meteorologicness happens. sent6: that the Maltese does not occur but the unmilitariness happens is triggered by the compressibleness. sent7: that the Malteseness does not occur is prevented by the dousing verdin. sent8: if the meteorologicness happens both the non-Malteseness and the dousing verdin happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the dysprosium is scrotal. | {A}{a} | sent1: the pad is scrotal if the dysprosium does watch doily and is inculpatory. sent2: if the pad watches doily and it is inculpatory the dysprosium is scrotal. sent3: everything does not watch doily and is inculpatory. sent4: everything does not watch doily. sent5: the pad does not watch doily. sent6: the dysprosium is non-scrotal if the fact that the caber is non-scrotal and does douse troponymy is false. sent7: the dysprosium is inculpatory. sent8: that something is non-docile thing that is a metalworking is false if it is not voyeuristic. sent9: if that something is not herbal and it does not brecciate is not true then it is non-voyeuristic. sent10: if something does douse troponymy then it is scrotal. sent11: the fact that the caber is not an herbal and it does not brecciate is not true. sent12: the dysprosium slithers if the fact that that the caber is not docile but a metalworking is not wrong is not right. sent13: the dysprosium is scrotal if the pad does not watch doily but it is inculpatory. sent14: the bagel does not watch doily. sent15: everything is not epizoic. sent16: that the pad is scrotal hold if the dysprosium does not watch doily but it is inculpatory. | sent1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {A}{aa} sent2: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} sent3: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: (x): ¬{AA}x sent5: ¬{AA}{aa} sent6: ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent7: {AB}{a} sent8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) sent9: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x sent10: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent11: ¬(¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) sent12: ¬(¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {D}{a} sent13: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {A}{a} sent14: ¬{AA}{fr} sent15: (x): ¬{IE}x sent16: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {A}{aa} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the pad does not watch doily and is inculpatory.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the hauler is scrotal. | {A}{ba} | [
"sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the hauler does douse troponymy is not false it is scrotal.; sent8 -> int3: that the caber is not docile but it is a metalworking is false if it is not voyeuristic.; sent9 -> int4: if that the caber is not a kind of an herbal and it does not brecciate does not hold it is not voyeuristic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the caber is not voyeuristic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the caber is non-docile and is a metalworking hold is false.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the dysprosium slithers is right.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it does slither.;"
]
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the dysprosium is scrotal. ; $context$ = sent1: the pad is scrotal if the dysprosium does watch doily and is inculpatory. sent2: if the pad watches doily and it is inculpatory the dysprosium is scrotal. sent3: everything does not watch doily and is inculpatory. sent4: everything does not watch doily. sent5: the pad does not watch doily. sent6: the dysprosium is non-scrotal if the fact that the caber is non-scrotal and does douse troponymy is false. sent7: the dysprosium is inculpatory. sent8: that something is non-docile thing that is a metalworking is false if it is not voyeuristic. sent9: if that something is not herbal and it does not brecciate is not true then it is non-voyeuristic. sent10: if something does douse troponymy then it is scrotal. sent11: the fact that the caber is not an herbal and it does not brecciate is not true. sent12: the dysprosium slithers if the fact that that the caber is not docile but a metalworking is not wrong is not right. sent13: the dysprosium is scrotal if the pad does not watch doily but it is inculpatory. sent14: the bagel does not watch doily. sent15: everything is not epizoic. sent16: that the pad is scrotal hold if the dysprosium does not watch doily but it is inculpatory. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: the pad does not watch doily and is inculpatory.; sent13 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.