version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
list | proofs_formula
list | negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
list | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance | the indissolubleness occurs. | {C} | sent1: the showering happens. sent2: if the proconsulship occurs or the thickness occurs or both then the indissolubleness does not occur. sent3: if the thickness does not occur the indissolubleness happens and the proconsulship does not occur. sent4: the thickness occurs. sent5: the thickness does not occur and/or the indissolubleness happens if the fact that the misfeasance does not occur is correct. | sent1: {FJ} sent2: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬{B} -> ({C} & ¬{A}) sent4: {B} sent5: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} v {C}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the proconsulship happens or the thickness happens or both.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the roughing ablution does not occur. | ¬{JC} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the indissolubleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the showering happens. sent2: if the proconsulship occurs or the thickness occurs or both then the indissolubleness does not occur. sent3: if the thickness does not occur the indissolubleness happens and the proconsulship does not occur. sent4: the thickness occurs. sent5: the thickness does not occur and/or the indissolubleness happens if the fact that the misfeasance does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the proconsulship happens or the thickness happens or both.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the hand does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: the incompatibleness does not occur. sent2: the handing happens if the rehearing gnome occurs. sent3: if the incompatibleness does not occur then the calyculateness occurs. sent4: the calyculateness happens. sent5: the rehearing gnome and the calyculateness happens if the fact that the incompatibleness does not occur is true. | sent1: ¬{A} sent2: {AA} -> {B} sent3: ¬{A} -> {AB} sent4: {AB} sent5: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the rehearing gnome and the calyculateness happens.; int1 -> int2: the rehearing gnome occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent1 -> int1: ({AA} & {AB}); int1 -> int2: {AA}; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the hand does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the incompatibleness does not occur. sent2: the handing happens if the rehearing gnome occurs. sent3: if the incompatibleness does not occur then the calyculateness occurs. sent4: the calyculateness happens. sent5: the rehearing gnome and the calyculateness happens if the fact that the incompatibleness does not occur is true. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the rehearing gnome and the calyculateness happens.; int1 -> int2: the rehearing gnome occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the technophobe is a map but it does not impugn menthol. | ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | sent1: the cymbalist is not a vengeance. sent2: that the technophobe does not impugn menthol is correct. sent3: the technophobe is a kind of a map but it does not impugn menthol if the Kansas does not impugn menthol. sent4: the fragmentation does not impugn menthol. sent5: the Kansas does impugn collaborator but it is not a southland. sent6: the Kansas does not impugn menthol and it is not a vengeance. sent7: if the technophobe is not a vengeance then the Kansas is a map. | sent1: ¬{B}{ba} sent2: ¬{A}{b} sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent4: ¬{A}{eo} sent5: ({BA}{a} & ¬{AJ}{a}) sent6: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent7: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{a} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the Kansas does not impugn menthol.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the technophobe is a map but it does not impugn menthol. ; $context$ = sent1: the cymbalist is not a vengeance. sent2: that the technophobe does not impugn menthol is correct. sent3: the technophobe is a kind of a map but it does not impugn menthol if the Kansas does not impugn menthol. sent4: the fragmentation does not impugn menthol. sent5: the Kansas does impugn collaborator but it is not a southland. sent6: the Kansas does not impugn menthol and it is not a vengeance. sent7: if the technophobe is not a vengeance then the Kansas is a map. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: the Kansas does not impugn menthol.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the working is majors. | {E}{aa} | sent1: the redeemer is a majors if the fact that the Hamlet does not vaticinate and is not a kind of a majors is not right. sent2: if something does not vaticinate it is not argumentative. sent3: that the working is majors is true if that it does impugn endorphin and does not rehear finish is not correct. sent4: that the working impugns endorphin and it does rehear finish is not true. sent5: if something is not argumentative then that it does impugn endorphin and does not rehear finish does not hold. sent6: if something is not unargumentative the fact that it does rehear finish and does not vaticinate does not hold. sent7: the fact that something impugns endorphin and it rehears finish is not true if it is not argumentative. sent8: if that the fluorapatite does major hold the working is not major. sent9: the fact that the working does impugn endorphin and does rehear finish is incorrect if it is not argumentative. sent10: if the redeemer does major then the fluorapatite does major. sent11: if that something does rehear finish and does not vaticinate is not true then it does not rehear finish. sent12: the working majors if it does rehear finish. | sent1: ¬(¬{A}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> {E}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x sent3: ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) -> {E}{aa} sent4: ¬({C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent6: (x): {B}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{A}x) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {D}x) sent8: {E}{a} -> ¬{E}{aa} sent9: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) sent10: {E}{b} -> {E}{a} sent11: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent12: {D}{aa} -> {E}{aa} | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the working does not vaticinate it is not argumentative.; sent5 -> int2: if the working is not argumentative then the fact that it impugns endorphin and does not rehear finish does not hold.;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 -> int2: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa});"
]
| the working is not a majors. | ¬{E}{aa} | []
| 6 | 4 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the working is majors. ; $context$ = sent1: the redeemer is a majors if the fact that the Hamlet does not vaticinate and is not a kind of a majors is not right. sent2: if something does not vaticinate it is not argumentative. sent3: that the working is majors is true if that it does impugn endorphin and does not rehear finish is not correct. sent4: that the working impugns endorphin and it does rehear finish is not true. sent5: if something is not argumentative then that it does impugn endorphin and does not rehear finish does not hold. sent6: if something is not unargumentative the fact that it does rehear finish and does not vaticinate does not hold. sent7: the fact that something impugns endorphin and it rehears finish is not true if it is not argumentative. sent8: if that the fluorapatite does major hold the working is not major. sent9: the fact that the working does impugn endorphin and does rehear finish is incorrect if it is not argumentative. sent10: if the redeemer does major then the fluorapatite does major. sent11: if that something does rehear finish and does not vaticinate is not true then it does not rehear finish. sent12: the working majors if it does rehear finish. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the working does not vaticinate it is not argumentative.; sent5 -> int2: if the working is not argumentative then the fact that it impugns endorphin and does not rehear finish does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the deterrence happens. | {C} | sent1: the rehearing Penn occurs. sent2: that the deterrence happens is triggered by that the thunderhead happens. sent3: the larvalness happens. | sent1: {A} sent2: {B} -> {C} sent3: {HB} | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the deterrence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the rehearing Penn occurs. sent2: that the deterrence happens is triggered by that the thunderhead happens. sent3: the larvalness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if that it rehears USCB hold then the fact that it is not a carmaker and it is non-mesomorphic is not right is not true. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: there is something such that if it does fancy then it is not a tunic and it does not impugn antineutron. sent2: if the pacesetter does rehear USCB then that it is both not a carmaker and not mesomorphic does not hold. sent3: if the pacesetter rehears USCB the fact that it is a carmaker and it is not mesomorphic is not correct. sent4: if the pacesetter rehears USCB it is not a carmaker and it is non-mesomorphic. sent5: if the pacesetter is mesomorphic the fact that it is neotenic and it is not a butterflyfish does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it rehears USCB then it is not a carmaker and it is not mesomorphic. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is pathological is not false that it is not a kind of a Odysseus and does not cloy is not true. sent8: if something is a Odysseus then the fact that it is not a carmaker and not a readout does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it rehears USCB then that it is a carmaker that is not mesomorphic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does rehear USCB then that it is not a carmaker and it is mesomorphic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is a skyhook then it does not rough pacesetter and is not benzylic. | sent1: (Ex): {JK}x -> (¬{EG}x & ¬{IA}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: {AB}{aa} -> ¬({EK}{aa} & ¬{AM}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent7: (Ex): {FC}x -> ¬(¬{IS}x & ¬{DU}x) sent8: (x): {IS}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{CO}x) sent9: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: (Ex): {IG}x -> (¬{AG}x & ¬{FF}x) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the puddingwife is not a kind of a carmaker and is not a readout is not right if it is a Odysseus. | {IS}{hd} -> ¬(¬{AA}{hd} & ¬{CO}{hd}) | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it rehears USCB hold then the fact that it is not a carmaker and it is non-mesomorphic is not right is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does fancy then it is not a tunic and it does not impugn antineutron. sent2: if the pacesetter does rehear USCB then that it is both not a carmaker and not mesomorphic does not hold. sent3: if the pacesetter rehears USCB the fact that it is a carmaker and it is not mesomorphic is not correct. sent4: if the pacesetter rehears USCB it is not a carmaker and it is non-mesomorphic. sent5: if the pacesetter is mesomorphic the fact that it is neotenic and it is not a butterflyfish does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it rehears USCB then it is not a carmaker and it is not mesomorphic. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is pathological is not false that it is not a kind of a Odysseus and does not cloy is not true. sent8: if something is a Odysseus then the fact that it is not a carmaker and not a readout does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it rehears USCB then that it is a carmaker that is not mesomorphic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it does rehear USCB then that it is not a carmaker and it is mesomorphic is incorrect. sent11: there is something such that if it is a skyhook then it does not rough pacesetter and is not benzylic. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the greyback does not doubt or it is a kind of a MRI or both. | (¬{D}{b} v {B}{b}) | sent1: the taurine does not allow if the hemoglobin is not a beguine. sent2: the Flagstaff is not a churchyard if something that is not a kind of a retrospective is a reviewer. sent3: the greyback is not a Tobagonian if the surrogate is a Callorhinus. sent4: if something is a kind of non-Austronesian thing that rehears coronet it is not a beguine. sent5: the surrogate does not allow if there is something such that it is not a MRI. sent6: if that the follower does rehear leptosporangium hold it is not retrospective and it is a reviewer. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not allow the surrogate either is a Callorhinus or does not allow or both. sent8: the greyback is not a MRI. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a Tobagonian. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a doubt. sent11: if the surrogate is a MRI the fact that the greyback is not a doubt and/or it is a MRI is wrong. sent12: the hemoglobin is not a Austronesian and does rehear coronet if something is not a kind of a churchyard. sent13: something is not a doubt or it is a MRI or both if it is not a kind of a Tobagonian. sent14: the follower rehears leptosporangium and is connate. sent15: the surrogate does not allow. sent16: the surrogate is not a doubt if there is something such that that it does not allow is true. sent17: the surrogate is a MRI that does not allow if there exists something such that it is not a Tobagonian. | sent1: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬{C}{c} sent2: (x): (¬{J}x & {K}x) -> ¬{I}{e} sent3: {E}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} sent4: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x sent5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent6: {L}{f} -> (¬{J}{f} & {K}{f}) sent7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({E}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent8: ¬{B}{b} sent9: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent11: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} v {B}{b}) sent12: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{D}x v {B}x) sent14: ({L}{f} & {M}{f}) sent15: ¬{C}{a} sent16: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}{a} sent17: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the surrogate is a kind of a MRI and does not allow.; int1 -> int2: the surrogate is a kind of a MRI.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: {B}{a}; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the greyback is not a doubt or it is a MRI or both. | (¬{D}{b} v {B}{b}) | [
"sent13 -> int3: if the greyback is not Tobagonian it is not a doubt and/or it is a MRI.; sent4 -> int4: if the hemoglobin is not a Austronesian but it does rehear coronet it is not a beguine.; sent14 -> int5: the follower does rehear leptosporangium.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the follower is not retrospective but a reviewer.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not a retrospective and it reviews.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the Flagstaff is not a kind of a churchyard.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a churchyard.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the hemoglobin is not a Austronesian and does rehear coronet.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the hemoglobin is not a beguine.; sent1 & int11 -> int12: the taurine does not allow.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it does not allow.; int13 & sent7 -> int14: the surrogate is a kind of a Callorhinus and/or it does not allow.;"
]
| 12 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the greyback does not doubt or it is a kind of a MRI or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the taurine does not allow if the hemoglobin is not a beguine. sent2: the Flagstaff is not a churchyard if something that is not a kind of a retrospective is a reviewer. sent3: the greyback is not a Tobagonian if the surrogate is a Callorhinus. sent4: if something is a kind of non-Austronesian thing that rehears coronet it is not a beguine. sent5: the surrogate does not allow if there is something such that it is not a MRI. sent6: if that the follower does rehear leptosporangium hold it is not retrospective and it is a reviewer. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not allow the surrogate either is a Callorhinus or does not allow or both. sent8: the greyback is not a MRI. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a Tobagonian. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a doubt. sent11: if the surrogate is a MRI the fact that the greyback is not a doubt and/or it is a MRI is wrong. sent12: the hemoglobin is not a Austronesian and does rehear coronet if something is not a kind of a churchyard. sent13: something is not a doubt or it is a MRI or both if it is not a kind of a Tobagonian. sent14: the follower rehears leptosporangium and is connate. sent15: the surrogate does not allow. sent16: the surrogate is not a doubt if there is something such that that it does not allow is true. sent17: the surrogate is a MRI that does not allow if there exists something such that it is not a Tobagonian. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the surrogate is a kind of a MRI and does not allow.; int1 -> int2: the surrogate is a kind of a MRI.; sent11 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there is something such that if that it is not endoscopic and it is a typography does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a motilin is not wrong is not correct. | ¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: the breeches is not a kind of a motilin if it is not endoscopic and it is a typography. sent2: if that the breeches is a kind of a line that is ectodermal is not true it is not a kind of a typography. sent3: if that that the breeches is a ingratitude that is a kind of a bulimic is not correct is not wrong that it does rehear Bunuel is not true. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is not endoscopic and it is a typography is incorrect it is a motilin. sent5: the breeches jokes if the fact that it is not a Cantharellus but endoscopic is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if it is universalistic then it is not a Wiccan. sent7: if the fact that the breeches is both not endoscopic and a typography does not hold then it is not a kind of a motilin. sent8: if the fact that the breeches does not vibrate but it is a typography is false it is not upland. sent9: the breeches is not a kind of a plain if the fact that it is a kind of a motilin and it is unobtrusive is not right. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a plain and is endoscopic is wrong then it does not rehear misfire. sent11: there exists something such that if it is septic it does not ripen Elapidae. sent12: if the breeches is not a typography then it is not a motilin. sent13: if that the breeches is not a kind of a sequel and is small-capitalization is not true then it is seedless. sent14: there is something such that if it is not syllogistic then it is not salable. sent15: there exists something such that if it rehears Glaucium it is not a toluene. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not nonhuman and restarts it is not a kid. sent17: there is something such that if it is not cultural then it is not a heavy. | sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent2: ¬({HH}{aa} & {FR}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent3: ¬({DH}{aa} & {HO}{aa}) -> ¬{P}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ¬(¬{FC}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> {CJ}{aa} sent6: (Ex): {IN}x -> ¬{ER}x sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent8: ¬(¬{HU}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{CQ}{aa} sent9: ¬({B}{aa} & {DU}{aa}) -> ¬{CT}{aa} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{CT}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{FT}x sent11: (Ex): {CI}x -> ¬{BU}x sent12: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent13: ¬(¬{FE}{aa} & {BO}{aa}) -> {FA}{aa} sent14: (Ex): ¬{FP}x -> ¬{EN}x sent15: (Ex): {AO}x -> ¬{BN}x sent16: (Ex): (¬{CG}x & {AH}x) -> ¬{HF}x sent17: (Ex): ¬{HI}x -> ¬{HS}x | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
]
| if that the deist is not a plain but endoscopic is false then it does not rehear misfire. | ¬(¬{CT}{hs} & {AA}{hs}) -> ¬{FT}{hs} | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not endoscopic and it is a typography does not hold the fact that it is not a kind of a motilin is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the breeches is not a kind of a motilin if it is not endoscopic and it is a typography. sent2: if that the breeches is a kind of a line that is ectodermal is not true it is not a kind of a typography. sent3: if that that the breeches is a ingratitude that is a kind of a bulimic is not correct is not wrong that it does rehear Bunuel is not true. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is not endoscopic and it is a typography is incorrect it is a motilin. sent5: the breeches jokes if the fact that it is not a Cantharellus but endoscopic is incorrect. sent6: there is something such that if it is universalistic then it is not a Wiccan. sent7: if the fact that the breeches is both not endoscopic and a typography does not hold then it is not a kind of a motilin. sent8: if the fact that the breeches does not vibrate but it is a typography is false it is not upland. sent9: the breeches is not a kind of a plain if the fact that it is a kind of a motilin and it is unobtrusive is not right. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a plain and is endoscopic is wrong then it does not rehear misfire. sent11: there exists something such that if it is septic it does not ripen Elapidae. sent12: if the breeches is not a typography then it is not a motilin. sent13: if that the breeches is not a kind of a sequel and is small-capitalization is not true then it is seedless. sent14: there is something such that if it is not syllogistic then it is not salable. sent15: there exists something such that if it rehears Glaucium it is not a toluene. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not nonhuman and restarts it is not a kid. sent17: there is something such that if it is not cultural then it is not a heavy. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pro-choiceness and the steeping conference occurs. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: the fact that the keratinizing voyeurism does not occur but the solitaire happens does not hold. sent2: both the presidentialness and the vesiculating occurs. sent3: the fact that the adolescent and the unactableness happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that that not the cleanup but the cockfight happens hold is incorrect. sent5: that the keratinizing voyeurism and the solitaire occurs is incorrect. sent6: that both the pro-choiceness and the steeping conference happens is not true if the stenographicness does not occur. sent7: the mass-spectrometricness happens. sent8: the fact that the keratinizing advowson happens hold. sent9: the affined happens. sent10: the cyberneticsness and the steeping abomination happens. sent11: if the fact that the presidentialness and the keratinizing voyeurism happens does not hold the keratinizing voyeurism does not occur. sent12: the steeping conference happens if the keratinizing voyeurism occurs. sent13: both the pro-choiceness and the stenographicness happens. | sent1: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) sent2: ({G} & {IF}) sent3: ¬({BB} & {CK}) sent4: ¬(¬{FR} & {IA}) sent5: ¬({E} & {D}) sent6: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) sent7: {II} sent8: {JD} sent9: {AF} sent10: ({HM} & {IU}) sent11: ¬({G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent12: {E} -> {C} sent13: ({A} & {B}) | [
"sent13 -> int1: the pro-choiceness happens.;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> int1: {A};"
]
| the fact that both the pro-choiceness and the steeping conference occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & {C}) | []
| 7 | 2 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pro-choiceness and the steeping conference occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the keratinizing voyeurism does not occur but the solitaire happens does not hold. sent2: both the presidentialness and the vesiculating occurs. sent3: the fact that the adolescent and the unactableness happens is wrong. sent4: the fact that that not the cleanup but the cockfight happens hold is incorrect. sent5: that the keratinizing voyeurism and the solitaire occurs is incorrect. sent6: that both the pro-choiceness and the steeping conference happens is not true if the stenographicness does not occur. sent7: the mass-spectrometricness happens. sent8: the fact that the keratinizing advowson happens hold. sent9: the affined happens. sent10: the cyberneticsness and the steeping abomination happens. sent11: if the fact that the presidentialness and the keratinizing voyeurism happens does not hold the keratinizing voyeurism does not occur. sent12: the steeping conference happens if the keratinizing voyeurism occurs. sent13: both the pro-choiceness and the stenographicness happens. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> int1: the pro-choiceness happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | both the steeping fringe and the bitting Cornus happens. | ({B} & {A}) | sent1: the bitting Cornus occurs. sent2: the nonproprietariness does not occur. sent3: that the steeping fringe does not occur is prevented by that the nonproprietariness and the ichorousness occurs. sent4: the non-nonproprietariness and the ichorousness happens. | sent1: {A} sent2: ¬{AA} sent3: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent4: (¬{AA} & {AB}) | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = both the steeping fringe and the bitting Cornus happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the bitting Cornus occurs. sent2: the nonproprietariness does not occur. sent3: that the steeping fringe does not occur is prevented by that the nonproprietariness and the ichorousness occurs. sent4: the non-nonproprietariness and the ichorousness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that that the edmontosaurus is Creole thing that does freeze battering is not wrong does not hold. | ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: the fact that the edmontosaurus is Creole thing that freezes battering does not hold if the electrolyte is not a dumbbell. sent2: if that something is pietistic but it is not a Gongora does not hold it is not pietistic. sent3: The battering freezes Moron. sent4: the lodestar is a kind of a Pole if there exists something such that the fact that it does not steep prion and it is high-rise is false. sent5: the electrolyte is a dumbbell if the edmontosaurus is not a Creole but it is a ablative. sent6: something does not steep malaise and does not overwhelm if it is a Pole. sent7: if the Moron is not a Valerianaceae the electrolyte is phonological and it does steep hyponymy. sent8: if the chalk is not a kind of a pip then the fact that the cingulum is a kind of a laugh but it does not keratinize severance is not correct. sent9: something is aware and is not stored-program if it does steep hyponymy. sent10: the electrolyte is a Creole. sent11: if the electrolyte is not a kind of a ablative and it is not papilliform the edmontosaurus is a dumbbell. sent12: the fact that the kneeler is pietistic but it is not a kind of a Gongora does not hold if something is a kind of a Gongora. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not steep prion and is high-rise is incorrect. sent14: if that something is a laugh and does not keratinize severance is not right then it does not laugh. sent15: something is not a dumbbell if it is aware thing that is not stored-program. sent16: the kneeler is not a pip if something that does not steep malaise does not overwhelm. sent17: the fact that the run is not a bimetallist but it is a ablative does not hold. sent18: the edmontosaurus is a Creole if it is a dumbbell. sent19: the edmontosaurus freezes battering if the Moron freezes battering. sent20: the fact that the Moron is stored-program but it is not a line is false. sent21: the affinity is a Mylodontidae that does golf if the cingulum does not laugh. sent22: the Moron freezes battering. sent23: the electrolyte is non-ablative and it is not papilliform. sent24: if the electrolyte is papilliform then it is lexical. sent25: if the fact that the kneeler is not a pip and not pietistic hold the chalk is not a pip. sent26: if that the run is not a bimetallist and is ablative is not correct then it is a kind of a Gongora. | sent1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬({N}x & ¬{P}x) -> ¬{N}x sent3: {AD}{ab} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{T}x & {S}x) -> {R}{h} sent5: (¬{A}{b} & {AA}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent6: (x): {R}x -> (¬{O}x & ¬{Q}x) sent7: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent8: ¬{M}{f} -> ¬({K}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) sent9: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) sent10: {A}{a} sent11: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent12: (x): {P}x -> ¬({N}{g} & ¬{P}{g}) sent13: (Ex): ¬(¬{T}x & {S}x) sent14: (x): ¬({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}x sent15: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent16: (x): (¬{O}x & ¬{Q}x) -> ¬{M}{g} sent17: ¬(¬{U}{i} & {AA}{i}) sent18: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent19: {C}{c} -> {C}{b} sent20: ¬({D}{c} & ¬{BO}{c}) sent21: ¬{K}{e} -> ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) sent22: {C}{c} sent23: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent24: {AB}{a} -> {IO}{a} sent25: (¬{M}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{M}{f} sent26: ¬(¬{U}{i} & {AA}{i}) -> {P}{i} | [
"sent11 & sent23 -> int1: the edmontosaurus is a dumbbell.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the edmontosaurus is Creole.; sent19 & sent22 -> int3: the edmontosaurus freezes battering.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 & sent23 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent18 -> int2: {A}{b}; sent19 & sent22 -> int3: {C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Moron is a kind of a Mailer that lines. | ({BL}{c} & {BO}{c}) | []
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that that the edmontosaurus is Creole thing that does freeze battering is not wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the edmontosaurus is Creole thing that freezes battering does not hold if the electrolyte is not a dumbbell. sent2: if that something is pietistic but it is not a Gongora does not hold it is not pietistic. sent3: The battering freezes Moron. sent4: the lodestar is a kind of a Pole if there exists something such that the fact that it does not steep prion and it is high-rise is false. sent5: the electrolyte is a dumbbell if the edmontosaurus is not a Creole but it is a ablative. sent6: something does not steep malaise and does not overwhelm if it is a Pole. sent7: if the Moron is not a Valerianaceae the electrolyte is phonological and it does steep hyponymy. sent8: if the chalk is not a kind of a pip then the fact that the cingulum is a kind of a laugh but it does not keratinize severance is not correct. sent9: something is aware and is not stored-program if it does steep hyponymy. sent10: the electrolyte is a Creole. sent11: if the electrolyte is not a kind of a ablative and it is not papilliform the edmontosaurus is a dumbbell. sent12: the fact that the kneeler is pietistic but it is not a kind of a Gongora does not hold if something is a kind of a Gongora. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it does not steep prion and is high-rise is incorrect. sent14: if that something is a laugh and does not keratinize severance is not right then it does not laugh. sent15: something is not a dumbbell if it is aware thing that is not stored-program. sent16: the kneeler is not a pip if something that does not steep malaise does not overwhelm. sent17: the fact that the run is not a bimetallist but it is a ablative does not hold. sent18: the edmontosaurus is a Creole if it is a dumbbell. sent19: the edmontosaurus freezes battering if the Moron freezes battering. sent20: the fact that the Moron is stored-program but it is not a line is false. sent21: the affinity is a Mylodontidae that does golf if the cingulum does not laugh. sent22: the Moron freezes battering. sent23: the electrolyte is non-ablative and it is not papilliform. sent24: if the electrolyte is papilliform then it is lexical. sent25: if the fact that the kneeler is not a pip and not pietistic hold the chalk is not a pip. sent26: if that the run is not a bimetallist and is ablative is not correct then it is a kind of a Gongora. ; $proof$ = | sent11 & sent23 -> int1: the edmontosaurus is a dumbbell.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the edmontosaurus is Creole.; sent19 & sent22 -> int3: the edmontosaurus freezes battering.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there is something such that if it is a Xenosaurus the fact that it is a kind of a showcase that is not dominical does not hold is not correct. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: if the savoy is a Xenosaurus it is a kind of a showcase that is not dominical. sent2: if the passe-partout is dominical that it does steep passe-partout and it is not a Maja is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if that it freezes abdomen hold then it is Riemannian but not a Norwegian. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Xenosaurus that it is a kind of a showcase and is dominical is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it does bitt cuscus the fact that it is a kind of a Australian that is not curious does not hold. sent6: that the lysozyme does freeze advowson but it is not a showcase does not hold if it is binucleate. sent7: if the savoy is a Xenosaurus the fact that it is a kind of a showcase and it is dominical is not correct. sent8: if the savoy is a kind of a quahog then that it does whomp and is not a plural is not true. sent9: if that the savoy is a Xenosaurus is right the fact that it is a showcase and not dominical is not right. | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: {AB}{fp} -> ¬({FM}{fp} & ¬{AE}{fp}) sent3: (Ex): {AK}x -> ({JC}x & ¬{HF}x) sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (Ex): {HE}x -> ¬({IT}x & ¬{GT}x) sent6: {DP}{ie} -> ¬({U}{ie} & ¬{AA}{ie}) sent7: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: {IA}{aa} -> ¬({BH}{aa} & ¬{FH}{aa}) sent9: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Xenosaurus the fact that it is a kind of a showcase that is not dominical does not hold is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the savoy is a Xenosaurus it is a kind of a showcase that is not dominical. sent2: if the passe-partout is dominical that it does steep passe-partout and it is not a Maja is wrong. sent3: there exists something such that if that it freezes abdomen hold then it is Riemannian but not a Norwegian. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Xenosaurus that it is a kind of a showcase and is dominical is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it does bitt cuscus the fact that it is a kind of a Australian that is not curious does not hold. sent6: that the lysozyme does freeze advowson but it is not a showcase does not hold if it is binucleate. sent7: if the savoy is a Xenosaurus the fact that it is a kind of a showcase and it is dominical is not correct. sent8: if the savoy is a kind of a quahog then that it does whomp and is not a plural is not true. sent9: if that the savoy is a Xenosaurus is right the fact that it is a showcase and not dominical is not right. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the keratinizing airmailer does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the desirableness happens. sent2: if the politeness does not occur the fact that the keratinizing airmailer does not occur and the desirableness does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the fixation happens and the politeness happens is brought about by that the full-termness does not occur. sent4: that the keratinizing airmailer does not occur is caused by that the politeness occurs and the desirableness happens. | sent1: {B} sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) sent3: ¬{D} -> ({DE} & {A}) sent4: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} | []
| []
| the fixation happens and the limacineness happens. | ({DE} & {IE}) | []
| 4 | 2 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the keratinizing airmailer does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the desirableness happens. sent2: if the politeness does not occur the fact that the keratinizing airmailer does not occur and the desirableness does not occur is not correct. sent3: that the fixation happens and the politeness happens is brought about by that the full-termness does not occur. sent4: that the keratinizing airmailer does not occur is caused by that the politeness occurs and the desirableness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the self-heal freezes Bruchus. | {A}{a} | sent1: the self-heal does keratinize cero. sent2: the Welshman freezes Bruchus. sent3: the self-heal does freeze Bruchus. sent4: the shelter does freeze Bruchus. sent5: if the ostrich is a flashboard the boxfish is a flashboard. sent6: the ostrich whishes if it does not foster. sent7: that the ostrich fosters and bitts toiler is false. sent8: something does not keratinize Welshman but it is an at if it is a sandwort. sent9: the resonator freezes Bruchus. sent10: the self-heal is a sexagenarian. sent11: The Bruchus does freeze self-heal. sent12: that the self-heal housebreaks is not false. sent13: the fact that the self-heal does not freeze Bruchus hold if the Pitot is a millivolt or freeze Bruchus or both. sent14: the self-heal is a disease. sent15: if something is a flashboard it does keratinize Dorado. sent16: the cero does freeze Bruchus. sent17: if the boxfish does keratinize Dorado then it is a sandwort. sent18: the ostrich does not keratinize serine but it is a flashboard if it whishes. sent19: the ostrich does not foster if that it does foster and does bitt toiler is false. | sent1: {AA}{a} sent2: {A}{cu} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {A}{hu} sent5: {G}{d} -> {G}{c} sent6: ¬{J}{d} -> {I}{d} sent7: ¬({J}{d} & {L}{d}) sent8: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) sent9: {A}{cm} sent10: {HE}{a} sent11: {AB}{aa} sent12: {AC}{a} sent13: ({B}{b} v {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent14: {GR}{a} sent15: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent16: {A}{bb} sent17: {F}{c} -> {E}{c} sent18: {I}{d} -> (¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent19: ¬({J}{d} & {L}{d}) -> ¬{J}{d} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the self-heal does not freeze Bruchus. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent8 -> int1: if the boxfish is a sandwort then it does not keratinize Welshman and is a kind of an at.; sent15 -> int2: if the boxfish is a flashboard then it keratinizes Dorado.; sent19 & sent7 -> int3: the ostrich does not foster.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the ostrich whishes.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the ostrich does not keratinize serine but it is a kind of a flashboard.; int5 -> int6: the ostrich is a flashboard.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the boxfish is a flashboard.; int2 & int7 -> int8: that the boxfish does keratinize Dorado is right.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the boxfish is a sandwort.; int1 & int9 -> int10: the boxfish does not keratinize Welshman and is a kind of an at.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not keratinize Welshman and is an at.;"
]
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the self-heal freezes Bruchus. ; $context$ = sent1: the self-heal does keratinize cero. sent2: the Welshman freezes Bruchus. sent3: the self-heal does freeze Bruchus. sent4: the shelter does freeze Bruchus. sent5: if the ostrich is a flashboard the boxfish is a flashboard. sent6: the ostrich whishes if it does not foster. sent7: that the ostrich fosters and bitts toiler is false. sent8: something does not keratinize Welshman but it is an at if it is a sandwort. sent9: the resonator freezes Bruchus. sent10: the self-heal is a sexagenarian. sent11: The Bruchus does freeze self-heal. sent12: that the self-heal housebreaks is not false. sent13: the fact that the self-heal does not freeze Bruchus hold if the Pitot is a millivolt or freeze Bruchus or both. sent14: the self-heal is a disease. sent15: if something is a flashboard it does keratinize Dorado. sent16: the cero does freeze Bruchus. sent17: if the boxfish does keratinize Dorado then it is a sandwort. sent18: the ostrich does not keratinize serine but it is a flashboard if it whishes. sent19: the ostrich does not foster if that it does foster and does bitt toiler is false. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the atheistness does not occur. | ¬{E} | sent1: if the pressorness does not occur the bitting questionnaire occurs. sent2: that the pressorness does not occur and the precondition does not occur causes that the bitting questionnaire does not occur. sent3: if the pressorness does not occur then the versification and the bitting questionnaire happens. sent4: if that the bitting questionnaire does not occur is correct then the versification occurs and the Job occurs. sent5: that the pressorness but not the allotropy happens is caused by that the keratinizing Amerindian happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the non-atheistness and the versification happens is not wrong does not hold if the bitting questionnaire does not occur. sent7: if both the pressorness and the precondition occurs then that the bitting questionnaire does not occur is true. sent8: that the cornhusking happens is prevented by that the steeping creaminess but not the shedding occurs. sent9: the agrypnoticness occurs and the twigging happens. sent10: that the twigging does not occur triggers that the atheist occurs and the agrypnoticness occurs. sent11: that the steeping Nero does not occur or that the deflection occurs or both is triggered by the influentialness. sent12: the bitting questionnaire happens. sent13: if the steeping Nero does not occur or the deflection occurs or both then the deflection happens. sent14: that the non-bauxiticness and the sensibleness occurs is false if the deflection happens. sent15: the keratinizing Amerindian and the ball happens if the cornhusking does not occur. sent16: the Job occurs if the twigging happens. sent17: that the atheistness occurs is prevented by that both the Job and the versification occurs. sent18: that the agrypnoticness occurs prevents the non-atypicalness. sent19: if that not the bauxiticness but the sensibleness happens is incorrect then the preconditioning occurs. sent20: the agrypnoticness occurs. sent21: if the sensibleness does not occur then that the pressorness does not occur and the preconditioning does not occur hold. | sent1: ¬{G} -> {F} sent2: (¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} sent3: ¬{G} -> ({D} & {F}) sent4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {C}) sent5: {M} -> ({G} & ¬{K}) sent6: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) sent7: ({G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} sent8: ({R} & ¬{S}) -> ¬{O} sent9: ({A} & {B}) sent10: ¬{B} -> ({E} & {A}) sent11: {Q} -> (¬{P} v {L}) sent12: {F} sent13: (¬{P} v {L}) -> {L} sent14: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & {I}) sent15: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) sent16: {B} -> {C} sent17: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{E} sent18: {A} -> {DM} sent19: ¬(¬{J} & {I}) -> {H} sent20: {A} sent21: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the twigging occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Job happens.;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent16 -> int2: {C};"
]
| the atypicalness happens. | {DM} | []
| 9 | 4 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the atheistness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pressorness does not occur the bitting questionnaire occurs. sent2: that the pressorness does not occur and the precondition does not occur causes that the bitting questionnaire does not occur. sent3: if the pressorness does not occur then the versification and the bitting questionnaire happens. sent4: if that the bitting questionnaire does not occur is correct then the versification occurs and the Job occurs. sent5: that the pressorness but not the allotropy happens is caused by that the keratinizing Amerindian happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the non-atheistness and the versification happens is not wrong does not hold if the bitting questionnaire does not occur. sent7: if both the pressorness and the precondition occurs then that the bitting questionnaire does not occur is true. sent8: that the cornhusking happens is prevented by that the steeping creaminess but not the shedding occurs. sent9: the agrypnoticness occurs and the twigging happens. sent10: that the twigging does not occur triggers that the atheist occurs and the agrypnoticness occurs. sent11: that the steeping Nero does not occur or that the deflection occurs or both is triggered by the influentialness. sent12: the bitting questionnaire happens. sent13: if the steeping Nero does not occur or the deflection occurs or both then the deflection happens. sent14: that the non-bauxiticness and the sensibleness occurs is false if the deflection happens. sent15: the keratinizing Amerindian and the ball happens if the cornhusking does not occur. sent16: the Job occurs if the twigging happens. sent17: that the atheistness occurs is prevented by that both the Job and the versification occurs. sent18: that the agrypnoticness occurs prevents the non-atypicalness. sent19: if that not the bauxiticness but the sensibleness happens is incorrect then the preconditioning occurs. sent20: the agrypnoticness occurs. sent21: if the sensibleness does not occur then that the pressorness does not occur and the preconditioning does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: the twigging occurs.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the Job happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the meclizine is a censer. | {B}{b} | sent1: the fact that the meclizine is a censer and it does steep vara is not correct if it is not a protrusion. sent2: if something is not climactic it is a orthogonality and is a slur. sent3: the supporter is a protrusion but it does not steep surpliced if the limb is not a orthogonality. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a censer and is a protrusion. sent5: the limb is not a protrusion. sent6: if the HIV is not a kind of a blaxploitation then the relish is a blaxploitation. sent7: if the limb is not a protrusion that it does steep vara and it is a vocal is wrong. sent8: something is not climactic if it is not a kind of a disaccharidase and it is not baccate. sent9: the kaoliang freezes strife. sent10: the fact that the relish is not a disaccharidase and it is not baccate is not incorrect if the fireplug does rick. sent11: if the chaetodon does not steep deltoid that that the nigger is a olecranon and/or a cerium is true is false. sent12: the meclizine is a kind of a protrusion and it is a kind of a censer if the limb does not steep surpliced. sent13: the meclizine is not a kind of a censer if something does not steep vara. sent14: the meclizine is not a censer if there exists something such that that it steeps vara and is a vocal is not right. sent15: if something that consults is not billiard then the chaetodon does not steep deltoid. sent16: there exists something such that it does steep vara and it is a vocal. sent17: something consults but it is not billiard if it freezes strife. sent18: the fireplug ricks and does freeze jolly. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of vocal thing that is a kind of a censer is false then the limb is not a kind of a protrusion. sent20: the fact that the HIV is not a blaxploitation is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a olecranon and/or it is a cerium is wrong. sent21: the meclizine does not freeze TRM. sent22: if something that is a protrusion does not steep surpliced it is not a censer. | sent1: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{b} & {AA}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({D}x & {F}x) sent3: ¬{D}{a} -> ({A}{eh} & ¬{C}{eh}) sent4: (Ex): ({B}x & {A}x) sent5: ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬{E}{d} -> {E}{c} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: (x): (¬{K}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{G}x sent9: {P}{g} sent10: {O}{h} -> (¬{K}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) sent11: ¬{L}{f} -> ¬({H}{e} v {I}{e}) sent12: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent13: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}{b} sent14: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent15: (x): ({N}x & ¬{M}x) -> ¬{L}{f} sent16: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent17: (x): {P}x -> ({N}x & ¬{M}x) sent18: ({O}{h} & {Q}{h}) sent19: (x): ¬({AB}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent20: (x): ¬({H}x v {I}x) -> ¬{E}{d} sent21: ¬{AG}{b} sent22: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the limb steeps vara and is a vocal is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does steep vara and it is a vocal is incorrect.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x); int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the meclizine is a kind of a censer. | {B}{b} | [
"sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the relish is not climactic is right it is a kind of a orthogonality that is a kind of a slur.; sent8 -> int4: the relish is not climactic if it is not a kind of a disaccharidase and it is not baccate.; sent18 -> int5: the fireplug ricks.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the relish is not a kind of a disaccharidase and it is not baccate.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the relish is not climactic.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the relish is a kind of a orthogonality and it slurs.; int8 -> int9: the relish is a orthogonality.; sent17 -> int10: if the kaoliang does freeze strife it does consult and it is not billiard.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the kaoliang consults but it is not billiard.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it consults and it is not billiard.; int12 & sent15 -> int13: the chaetodon does not steep deltoid.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the fact that the nigger is a olecranon or it is a cerium or both is not right is not incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a olecranon or is a cerium or both does not hold.; int15 & sent20 -> int16: the HIV is not a blaxploitation.; sent6 & int16 -> int17: that the relish is a blaxploitation is true.; int9 & int17 -> int18: the relish is a orthogonality and it is a blaxploitation.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it is a orthogonality and it is a blaxploitation.;"
]
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the meclizine is a censer. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the meclizine is a censer and it does steep vara is not correct if it is not a protrusion. sent2: if something is not climactic it is a orthogonality and is a slur. sent3: the supporter is a protrusion but it does not steep surpliced if the limb is not a orthogonality. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of a censer and is a protrusion. sent5: the limb is not a protrusion. sent6: if the HIV is not a kind of a blaxploitation then the relish is a blaxploitation. sent7: if the limb is not a protrusion that it does steep vara and it is a vocal is wrong. sent8: something is not climactic if it is not a kind of a disaccharidase and it is not baccate. sent9: the kaoliang freezes strife. sent10: the fact that the relish is not a disaccharidase and it is not baccate is not incorrect if the fireplug does rick. sent11: if the chaetodon does not steep deltoid that that the nigger is a olecranon and/or a cerium is true is false. sent12: the meclizine is a kind of a protrusion and it is a kind of a censer if the limb does not steep surpliced. sent13: the meclizine is not a kind of a censer if something does not steep vara. sent14: the meclizine is not a censer if there exists something such that that it steeps vara and is a vocal is not right. sent15: if something that consults is not billiard then the chaetodon does not steep deltoid. sent16: there exists something such that it does steep vara and it is a vocal. sent17: something consults but it is not billiard if it freezes strife. sent18: the fireplug ricks and does freeze jolly. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of vocal thing that is a kind of a censer is false then the limb is not a kind of a protrusion. sent20: the fact that the HIV is not a blaxploitation is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a olecranon and/or it is a cerium is wrong. sent21: the meclizine does not freeze TRM. sent22: if something that is a protrusion does not steep surpliced it is not a censer. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the limb steeps vara and is a vocal is not right.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it does steep vara and it is a vocal is incorrect.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Champaign keratinizes Popper and is a chopstick. | ({C}{b} & {E}{b}) | sent1: if the frill is not a kind of a Lir then it is craniometric and is a decameter. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not a 1790s and does keratinize Popper is wrong the rummer does not keratinize Popper. sent3: that something is not a 1790s and does keratinize Popper is incorrect if it is craniometric. sent4: if the rummer is craniometric that the Champaign is not a decameter hold. sent5: the Champaign is a chopstick if the frill is a Lir. sent6: the Champaign is a Lir. sent7: the Champaign is a chopstick if the frill is a kind of a chopstick. sent8: the frill is both palatable and a decameter. sent9: the autoregulation is a 1790s. sent10: the six-spot does not steep clinic and is a kind of a Lir if the fact that it is paschal is not incorrect. sent11: the rummer is not a 1790s. sent12: the Champaign is not a decameter. sent13: the frill is a kind of a chopstick or is a Lir or both if the fact that it is not paschal hold. sent14: the frill is not paschal. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a decameter. sent16: the frill is not unpronounceable. sent17: the rummer is not a 1790s and is craniometric. sent18: if the six-spot does not steep clinic and is a kind of a Lir then the frill is not a Lir. | sent1: ¬{F}{c} -> ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent3: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} sent6: {F}{b} sent7: {E}{c} -> {E}{b} sent8: ({DF}{c} & {D}{c}) sent9: {A}{bk} sent10: {G}{d} -> (¬{H}{d} & {F}{d}) sent11: ¬{A}{a} sent12: ¬{D}{b} sent13: ¬{G}{c} -> ({E}{c} v {F}{c}) sent14: ¬{G}{c} sent15: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent16: ¬{K}{c} sent17: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent18: (¬{H}{d} & {F}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} | [
"sent17 -> int1: the rummer is craniometric.; sent13 & sent14 -> int2: the frill is either a chopstick or a Lir or both.; int2 & sent7 & sent5 -> int3: the Champaign is a chopstick.;"
]
| [
"sent17 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent13 & sent14 -> int2: ({E}{c} v {F}{c}); int2 & sent7 & sent5 -> int3: {E}{b};"
]
| the fact that the Champaign keratinizes Popper and is a chopstick is not correct. | ¬({C}{b} & {E}{b}) | [
"sent3 -> int4: if the frill is craniometric the fact that it is not a 1790s and does keratinize Popper is false.;"
]
| 9 | 4 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Champaign keratinizes Popper and is a chopstick. ; $context$ = sent1: if the frill is not a kind of a Lir then it is craniometric and is a decameter. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not a 1790s and does keratinize Popper is wrong the rummer does not keratinize Popper. sent3: that something is not a 1790s and does keratinize Popper is incorrect if it is craniometric. sent4: if the rummer is craniometric that the Champaign is not a decameter hold. sent5: the Champaign is a chopstick if the frill is a Lir. sent6: the Champaign is a Lir. sent7: the Champaign is a chopstick if the frill is a kind of a chopstick. sent8: the frill is both palatable and a decameter. sent9: the autoregulation is a 1790s. sent10: the six-spot does not steep clinic and is a kind of a Lir if the fact that it is paschal is not incorrect. sent11: the rummer is not a 1790s. sent12: the Champaign is not a decameter. sent13: the frill is a kind of a chopstick or is a Lir or both if the fact that it is not paschal hold. sent14: the frill is not paschal. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a decameter. sent16: the frill is not unpronounceable. sent17: the rummer is not a 1790s and is craniometric. sent18: if the six-spot does not steep clinic and is a kind of a Lir then the frill is not a Lir. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> int1: the rummer is craniometric.; sent13 & sent14 -> int2: the frill is either a chopstick or a Lir or both.; int2 & sent7 & sent5 -> int3: the Champaign is a chopstick.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the broadtail is not eager. | ¬{D}{aa} | sent1: if that the broadtail is a shell is right the maiden is both not non-Chian and not eager. sent2: the fact that the broadtail is a kind of a polymastigote is correct if the fact that the fact that the maiden is Chian and is not a polymastigote is correct is not correct. sent3: if something is Chian it is not eager. sent4: if the laurel-tree is eager and is not smoky then the grist is not a kind of a shell. sent5: if the broadtail is Chian then that it is not eager hold. sent6: something is not eager if that it is both not smoky and not Chian is wrong. sent7: if the laurel-tree is not Chian the grist is Chian. sent8: the fact that the presbytery is a kind of a polymastigote and it is smoky is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is not smoky but it is Chian is not correct if it does not shell. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of non-smoky thing that is not Chian is not correct if it does not shell. sent11: if something that does keratinize count is not three-wheel then it is not a shell. sent12: the fact that the broadtail is both not smoky and Chian is wrong. sent13: if the acarine is a Etropus then the laurel-tree is not Chian and/or is not a kind of a politburo. sent14: the broadtail keratinizes count and is not three-wheel if the maiden is a polymastigote. sent15: the broadtail is not three-wheel. sent16: if the fact that there is something such that that it is a polymastigote and it is not non-smoky is not correct is not false the grist does shell. sent17: the fact that the broadtail is not smoky but it is Chian does not hold if that it is not a shell hold. sent18: the maiden is not eager. sent19: if the comforts is unconscientious thing that is a kind of a Etropus the acarine is a kind of a Etropus. sent20: if the maiden is a polymastigote then the broadtail is not three-wheel. sent21: the maiden is not eager if the fact that the broadtail is a polymastigote hold. sent22: if the broadtail keratinizes count and it is three-wheel it is not a shell. sent23: if something does keratinize count and is three-wheel it is not a shell. sent24: if something is either not Chian or not a politburo or both it is not Chian. | sent1: {B}{aa} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent2: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {E}{aa} sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬{D}x sent4: ({D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬{D}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent7: ¬{A}{c} -> {A}{b} sent8: ¬({E}{e} & {C}{e}) sent9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent11: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent12: ¬(¬{C}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent13: {F}{d} -> (¬{A}{c} v ¬{G}{c}) sent14: {E}{a} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent15: ¬{AB}{aa} sent16: (x): ¬({E}x & {C}x) -> {B}{b} sent17: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{C}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent18: ¬{D}{a} sent19: (¬{H}{f} & {F}{f}) -> {F}{d} sent20: {E}{a} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent21: {E}{aa} -> ¬{D}{a} sent22: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent23: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent24: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{G}x) -> ¬{A}x | [
"sent11 -> int1: if the broadtail keratinizes count but it is not three-wheel then it is not a shell.; sent10 -> int2: if the broadtail is not a shell that it is not smoky and it is not Chian is wrong.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the broadtail is non-smoky thing that is not Chian is incorrect then it is not eager.;"
]
| [
"sent11 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent10 -> int2: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{C}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}); sent6 -> int3: ¬(¬{C}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) -> ¬{D}{aa};"
]
| the broadtail is a polymastigote. | {E}{aa} | []
| 7 | 4 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the broadtail is not eager. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the broadtail is a shell is right the maiden is both not non-Chian and not eager. sent2: the fact that the broadtail is a kind of a polymastigote is correct if the fact that the fact that the maiden is Chian and is not a polymastigote is correct is not correct. sent3: if something is Chian it is not eager. sent4: if the laurel-tree is eager and is not smoky then the grist is not a kind of a shell. sent5: if the broadtail is Chian then that it is not eager hold. sent6: something is not eager if that it is both not smoky and not Chian is wrong. sent7: if the laurel-tree is not Chian the grist is Chian. sent8: the fact that the presbytery is a kind of a polymastigote and it is smoky is incorrect. sent9: the fact that something is not smoky but it is Chian is not correct if it does not shell. sent10: the fact that something is a kind of non-smoky thing that is not Chian is not correct if it does not shell. sent11: if something that does keratinize count is not three-wheel then it is not a shell. sent12: the fact that the broadtail is both not smoky and Chian is wrong. sent13: if the acarine is a Etropus then the laurel-tree is not Chian and/or is not a kind of a politburo. sent14: the broadtail keratinizes count and is not three-wheel if the maiden is a polymastigote. sent15: the broadtail is not three-wheel. sent16: if the fact that there is something such that that it is a polymastigote and it is not non-smoky is not correct is not false the grist does shell. sent17: the fact that the broadtail is not smoky but it is Chian does not hold if that it is not a shell hold. sent18: the maiden is not eager. sent19: if the comforts is unconscientious thing that is a kind of a Etropus the acarine is a kind of a Etropus. sent20: if the maiden is a polymastigote then the broadtail is not three-wheel. sent21: the maiden is not eager if the fact that the broadtail is a polymastigote hold. sent22: if the broadtail keratinizes count and it is three-wheel it is not a shell. sent23: if something does keratinize count and is three-wheel it is not a shell. sent24: if something is either not Chian or not a politburo or both it is not Chian. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: if the broadtail keratinizes count but it is not three-wheel then it is not a shell.; sent10 -> int2: if the broadtail is not a shell that it is not smoky and it is not Chian is wrong.; sent6 -> int3: if the fact that the broadtail is non-smoky thing that is not Chian is incorrect then it is not eager.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the ormer is not uterine and does not smear. | (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: something is not a champerty if it does not freeze ormer. sent2: that something is non-uterine and not a smear is not true if it does not interpose. sent3: if the synthesist does not goose then the ormer does interpose. sent4: the synthesist does interpose if the ormer is not a goose. sent5: if something does interpose it is not uterine and it is not a smear. sent6: the synthesist does not interpose but it is a goose if the bellows is not a champerty. sent7: if that something is fetal and it does exploit is not right it does not freeze ormer. | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent4: ¬{B}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x | [
"sent5 -> int1: if that the ormer interposes is right then it is non-uterine thing that is not a smear.;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
]
| the fact that the ormer is both non-uterine and not a smear is not true. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent2 -> int2: the fact that the ormer is both not uterine and not a smear is not true if that it does not interpose is not incorrect.;"
]
| 4 | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ormer is not uterine and does not smear. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a champerty if it does not freeze ormer. sent2: that something is non-uterine and not a smear is not true if it does not interpose. sent3: if the synthesist does not goose then the ormer does interpose. sent4: the synthesist does interpose if the ormer is not a goose. sent5: if something does interpose it is not uterine and it is not a smear. sent6: the synthesist does not interpose but it is a goose if the bellows is not a champerty. sent7: if that something is fetal and it does exploit is not right it does not freeze ormer. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: if that the ormer interposes is right then it is non-uterine thing that is not a smear.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it sparges and it does steep Correggio. | (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) | sent1: the growth does sparge. sent2: there exists something such that it is cytotoxic and is a schlemiel. sent3: the fact that the dump does steep Correggio and is a xanthine is not correct. sent4: there is something such that it does steep Correggio. sent5: if the sickbay is a xanthine it is a methanol. sent6: The Correggio does steep assegai. sent7: the cassowary sparges. sent8: there exists something such that it sparges. sent9: the strait is a kind of collateral thing that does sparge. sent10: the assegai is a pacemaker. sent11: the assegai is multinucleate. sent12: there is something such that it is a diethylstilbestrol. sent13: the assegai does putter. sent14: the assegai does steep Correggio. | sent1: {A}{fj} sent2: (Ex): ({HT}x & {HA}x) sent3: ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent4: (Ex): {B}x sent5: {C}{jh} -> {GF}{jh} sent6: {AA}{aa} sent7: {A}{bg} sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: ({D}{gh} & {A}{gh}) sent10: {CR}{a} sent11: {CF}{a} sent12: (Ex): {BO}x sent13: {DO}{a} sent14: {B}{a} | []
| []
| something is both a monition and a Koussevitzky. | (Ex): ({CO}x & {FF}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it steeps Correggio and it is a xanthine does not hold.;"
]
| 4 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it sparges and it does steep Correggio. ; $context$ = sent1: the growth does sparge. sent2: there exists something such that it is cytotoxic and is a schlemiel. sent3: the fact that the dump does steep Correggio and is a xanthine is not correct. sent4: there is something such that it does steep Correggio. sent5: if the sickbay is a xanthine it is a methanol. sent6: The Correggio does steep assegai. sent7: the cassowary sparges. sent8: there exists something such that it sparges. sent9: the strait is a kind of collateral thing that does sparge. sent10: the assegai is a pacemaker. sent11: the assegai is multinucleate. sent12: there is something such that it is a diethylstilbestrol. sent13: the assegai does putter. sent14: the assegai does steep Correggio. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the liberalization occurs. | {B} | sent1: the client-serverness results in that the steeping signage does not occur and the keratinizing decalcification occurs. sent2: that the sealedness and the entericness occurs is not correct if the saccade does not occur. sent3: if the steeping signage does not occur then not the saccade but the freezing speculativeness happens. sent4: that the saccade occurs prevents that the liberalization does not occur. sent5: either that the keratinizing tercentennial occurs or that the keratinizing freebie happens or both is brought about by that the freezing hypo does not occur. sent6: that the freezing hypo happens is prevented by that the catalectic but not the steeping Nubian occurs. sent7: the entericness happens if the freezing speculativeness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the entericness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the freezing acetaminophen happens. sent10: the fact that not the keratinizing pike-perch but the bitting poised happens is incorrect. sent11: both the freezing Broadway and the liberalization occurs if the steeping signage does not occur. sent12: that the rule does not occur causes that the falls and the catalectic happens. sent13: if not the saccade but the freezing speculativeness occurs then the liberalization does not occur. sent14: the freezing speculativeness does not occur. | sent1: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent3: ¬{D} -> (¬{A} & {C}) sent4: {A} -> {B} sent5: ¬{I} -> ({G} v {H}) sent6: ({J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} sent7: ¬{C} -> {AB} sent8: {AB} sent9: {EN} sent10: ¬(¬{BU} & {HR}) sent11: ¬{D} -> ({FT} & {B}) sent12: ¬{M} -> ({L} & {J}) sent13: (¬{A} & {C}) -> ¬{B} sent14: ¬{C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saccade does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the non-uncertainness and the entericness happens is false.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB});"
]
| not the conveyance but the freezing Broadway occurs. | (¬{IK} & {FT}) | []
| 4 | 4 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the liberalization occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the client-serverness results in that the steeping signage does not occur and the keratinizing decalcification occurs. sent2: that the sealedness and the entericness occurs is not correct if the saccade does not occur. sent3: if the steeping signage does not occur then not the saccade but the freezing speculativeness happens. sent4: that the saccade occurs prevents that the liberalization does not occur. sent5: either that the keratinizing tercentennial occurs or that the keratinizing freebie happens or both is brought about by that the freezing hypo does not occur. sent6: that the freezing hypo happens is prevented by that the catalectic but not the steeping Nubian occurs. sent7: the entericness happens if the freezing speculativeness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the entericness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the freezing acetaminophen happens. sent10: the fact that not the keratinizing pike-perch but the bitting poised happens is incorrect. sent11: both the freezing Broadway and the liberalization occurs if the steeping signage does not occur. sent12: that the rule does not occur causes that the falls and the catalectic happens. sent13: if not the saccade but the freezing speculativeness occurs then the liberalization does not occur. sent14: the freezing speculativeness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saccade does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the non-uncertainness and the entericness happens is false.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the obsolescence is not a gimbal but a Priam is false. | ¬(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c}) | sent1: if something is a Cairo it is both not a gimbal and a Priam. sent2: the obsolescence is stoppable if the landscaping is masochistic. sent3: the fact that the obsolescence is both not a gimbal and a Priam does not hold if the armpit is stoppable. sent4: if something does not steep Desmodium and is not a crock it is stoppable. sent5: the landscaping is a Cairo. sent6: the landscaping is a trismus and it is masochistic if the armpit is not a convalescent. sent7: the armpit is not a convalescent if the limb does not steep hybridization and is a convalescent. sent8: something is a Cairo if it is stoppable. sent9: if the landscaping is a Cairo the armpit does not steep Desmodium and it does not crock. | sent1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x) sent2: {E}{a} -> {B}{c} sent3: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {C}{c}) sent4: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: {A}{a} sent6: ¬{G}{b} -> ({F}{a} & {E}{a}) sent7: (¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{G}{b} sent8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent9: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | [
"sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the armpit does not steep Desmodium and is not a crock.; sent4 -> int2: if the armpit does not steep Desmodium and it is not a crock it is stoppable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the armpit is stoppable.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent5 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent4 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{b}; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the obsolescence is not a gimbal but it is a kind of a Priam. | (¬{D}{c} & {C}{c}) | [
"sent1 -> int4: if the obsolescence is a Cairo it is not a gimbal and it is a kind of a Priam.; sent8 -> int5: if the obsolescence is stoppable the fact that it is a kind of a Cairo is right.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the obsolescence is not a gimbal but a Priam is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Cairo it is both not a gimbal and a Priam. sent2: the obsolescence is stoppable if the landscaping is masochistic. sent3: the fact that the obsolescence is both not a gimbal and a Priam does not hold if the armpit is stoppable. sent4: if something does not steep Desmodium and is not a crock it is stoppable. sent5: the landscaping is a Cairo. sent6: the landscaping is a trismus and it is masochistic if the armpit is not a convalescent. sent7: the armpit is not a convalescent if the limb does not steep hybridization and is a convalescent. sent8: something is a Cairo if it is stoppable. sent9: if the landscaping is a Cairo the armpit does not steep Desmodium and it does not crock. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the armpit does not steep Desmodium and is not a crock.; sent4 -> int2: if the armpit does not steep Desmodium and it is not a crock it is stoppable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the armpit is stoppable.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the asparagus is acidic. | {A}{aa} | sent1: the rayon is limnological. sent2: either the asparagus is not limnological or it is a Creole or both. sent3: if something is not technophobic it is achromatinic. sent4: the asparagus is limnological and/or it is not a kind of a Creole. sent5: everything either is not syncategorematic or does keratinize warrigal or both. sent6: if that the asparagus is a subphylum hold then it does keratinize disinformation. sent7: either the asparagus does not keratinize fixative or it is Creole or both. sent8: there exists something such that it detaches and is unimpressionable. sent9: if the asparagus either does not keratinize Terence or is not a gooseneck or both the fact that it is acidic is true. sent10: something does steep seckel but it does not keratinize Dionysia if it does keratinize disinformation. sent11: everything is non-limnological or not Creole or both. sent12: if something steeps seckel but it is not acidic then it is not a Creole. sent13: something that is non-tropical or does not steep pantheist or both is a Vinca. sent14: the fact that either everything is limnological or it is not a Creole or both is not incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the asparagus steeps seckel but it does not keratinize Dionysia hold it is not acidic. sent16: the asparagus is not a ten or not amphitheatric or both. sent17: something does steep seckel but it is not acidic if the fact that it keratinizes Dionysia is not incorrect. | sent1: {AA}{hl} sent2: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{CL}x -> {JJ}x sent4: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: (x): (¬{R}x v {BU}x) sent6: {E}{aa} -> {D}{aa} sent7: (¬{CQ}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent8: (Ex): ({G}x & {F}x) sent9: (¬{Q}{aa} v ¬{U}{aa}) -> {A}{aa} sent10: (x): {D}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent11: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent12: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent13: (x): (¬{AQ}x v ¬{IT}x) -> {HE}x sent14: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent15: ({B}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent16: (¬{FR}{aa} v ¬{DH}{aa}) sent17: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the asparagus is either not limnological or not a Creole or both.;"
]
| [
"sent11 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa});"
]
| the elevator does not keratinize disinformation or it is not a kind of a Creole or both. | (¬{D}{ij} v ¬{AB}{ij}) | [
"sent12 -> int2: the elevator is not Creole if it does steep seckel and it is not acidic.; sent17 -> int3: if the elevator does keratinize Dionysia then it steeps seckel and it is non-acidic.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the asparagus is acidic. ; $context$ = sent1: the rayon is limnological. sent2: either the asparagus is not limnological or it is a Creole or both. sent3: if something is not technophobic it is achromatinic. sent4: the asparagus is limnological and/or it is not a kind of a Creole. sent5: everything either is not syncategorematic or does keratinize warrigal or both. sent6: if that the asparagus is a subphylum hold then it does keratinize disinformation. sent7: either the asparagus does not keratinize fixative or it is Creole or both. sent8: there exists something such that it detaches and is unimpressionable. sent9: if the asparagus either does not keratinize Terence or is not a gooseneck or both the fact that it is acidic is true. sent10: something does steep seckel but it does not keratinize Dionysia if it does keratinize disinformation. sent11: everything is non-limnological or not Creole or both. sent12: if something steeps seckel but it is not acidic then it is not a Creole. sent13: something that is non-tropical or does not steep pantheist or both is a Vinca. sent14: the fact that either everything is limnological or it is not a Creole or both is not incorrect. sent15: if the fact that the asparagus steeps seckel but it does not keratinize Dionysia hold it is not acidic. sent16: the asparagus is not a ten or not amphitheatric or both. sent17: something does steep seckel but it is not acidic if the fact that it keratinizes Dionysia is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the asparagus is either not limnological or not a Creole or both.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is neonatal it dates and it does not bitt stotinka. | (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: something extorts and it is vesical if it bitts Bassia. sent2: something is machine-made if it steeps switcheroo. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a cine-film then it tsks and keratinizes Entebbe. sent4: if the Chicano does keratinize SOB it does date and it is unapologetic. sent5: the Chicano is a kind of a Arapaho that is a dating if it is a kind of a rent. sent6: there is something such that if it does freeze eviction then it reunifies and it is not a pervert. sent7: the vestment is neonatal and it is hyaloplasmic if it is catabolic. sent8: if the Chicano is a kind of a ramus then it is unairworthy. sent9: if the SOB is a folding then it bitts fivepence and is not neonatal. sent10: if the flummery is a ash-key then it steeps tucked and is a flash-forward. sent11: something does keratinize anatotitan and it is a Characidae if it steeps hyperbole. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Dictaphone it does keratinize Nitrobacter and it is a kind of a Kentucky. sent13: if the Chicano is obvious it dates and does freeze Megaera. | sent1: (x): {M}x -> ({JE}x & {JB}x) sent2: (x): {CO}x -> {CH}x sent3: (Ex): {CD}x -> ({ED}x & {IK}x) sent4: {FB}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {HU}{aa}) sent5: {JD}{aa} -> ({AD}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) sent6: (Ex): {IU}x -> ({IE}x & ¬{JK}x) sent7: {FM}{gf} -> ({A}{gf} & {L}{gf}) sent8: {HC}{aa} -> {HT}{aa} sent9: {HH}{hb} -> ({AE}{hb} & ¬{A}{hb}) sent10: {ES}{gs} -> ({BB}{gs} & {IM}{gs}) sent11: (x): {BU}x -> ({HM}x & {IO}x) sent12: (Ex): {DK}x -> ({E}x & {FG}x) sent13: {BK}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {DD}{aa}) | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is neonatal it dates and it does not bitt stotinka. ; $context$ = sent1: something extorts and it is vesical if it bitts Bassia. sent2: something is machine-made if it steeps switcheroo. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a cine-film then it tsks and keratinizes Entebbe. sent4: if the Chicano does keratinize SOB it does date and it is unapologetic. sent5: the Chicano is a kind of a Arapaho that is a dating if it is a kind of a rent. sent6: there is something such that if it does freeze eviction then it reunifies and it is not a pervert. sent7: the vestment is neonatal and it is hyaloplasmic if it is catabolic. sent8: if the Chicano is a kind of a ramus then it is unairworthy. sent9: if the SOB is a folding then it bitts fivepence and is not neonatal. sent10: if the flummery is a ash-key then it steeps tucked and is a flash-forward. sent11: something does keratinize anatotitan and it is a Characidae if it steeps hyperbole. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Dictaphone it does keratinize Nitrobacter and it is a kind of a Kentucky. sent13: if the Chicano is obvious it dates and does freeze Megaera. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the apprentice is rhetorical. | {B}{aa} | sent1: the micrometer is miotic. sent2: the Chicano is rhetorical. sent3: if something that is playable is not conditional then it does steep posed. sent4: the apprentice is not rhetorical if that the planking is both not a bop and rhetorical is false. sent5: something that is a kind of a blessedness and is not a kind of a miotic is rhetorical. sent6: something is a kind of a blessedness if it is a kind of a copula. sent7: if something does roll but it is not a pteridophyte it is a syncope. sent8: if something is a kind of obtrusive thing that is not exergonic then that it is playable is right. sent9: the apprentice is not a miotic. | sent1: {AB}{iu} sent2: {B}{ej} sent3: (x): ({DT}x & ¬{JG}x) -> {CB}x sent4: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x sent7: (x): ({CH}x & ¬{CS}x) -> {IC}x sent8: (x): ({IA}x & ¬{M}x) -> {DT}x sent9: ¬{AB}{aa} | [
"sent5 -> int1: if that the apprentice is both a blessedness and not a miotic is true then it is rhetorical.;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
]
| the pyroxene is a blessedness. | {AA}{bs} | [
"sent6 -> int2: if the pyroxene is a copula then it is a blessedness.;"
]
| 4 | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the apprentice is rhetorical. ; $context$ = sent1: the micrometer is miotic. sent2: the Chicano is rhetorical. sent3: if something that is playable is not conditional then it does steep posed. sent4: the apprentice is not rhetorical if that the planking is both not a bop and rhetorical is false. sent5: something that is a kind of a blessedness and is not a kind of a miotic is rhetorical. sent6: something is a kind of a blessedness if it is a kind of a copula. sent7: if something does roll but it is not a pteridophyte it is a syncope. sent8: if something is a kind of obtrusive thing that is not exergonic then that it is playable is right. sent9: the apprentice is not a miotic. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: if that the apprentice is both a blessedness and not a miotic is true then it is rhetorical.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the chiropractor is not a kind of a onager and/or does not idle. | (¬{D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) | sent1: the pip is nonclassical and it is nonprofessional if it is not a octoroon. sent2: the chiropractor is either not a onager or an idle or both if the immigrant is a onager. sent3: either the chiropractor is not a onager or it does idle or both if something is classical. sent4: if the immigrant is a kind of an instrument then it does bitt Desmodium. sent5: the immigrant is a kind of a onager if the pip is either not nonprofessional or nonclassical or both. sent6: the immigrant is a onager if the pip is not nonprofessional. sent7: if the immigrant is a onager the chiropractor is either not a onager or not idle or both. sent8: the pip is not a octoroon if the fact that the immigrant is a kind of non-brahminic thing that is not a octoroon is false. sent9: that something is a kind of non-brahminic thing that is not a kind of a octoroon does not hold if it bitts Desmodium. sent10: that the pip is not nonprofessional and/or it is nonclassical hold if there is something such that it is not crustal. sent11: there exists something such that it is not crustal. sent12: there is something such that it is not a onager. | sent1: ¬{F}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: {D}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} v {E}{c}) sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{D}{c} v {E}{c}) sent4: {I}{b} -> {H}{b} sent5: (¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent6: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{b} sent7: {D}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) sent8: ¬(¬{G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent9: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent11: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent12: (Ex): ¬{D}x | [
"sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the pip is not nonprofessional or is nonclassical or both.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the immigrant is a kind of a onager hold.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 & sent10 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}); sent5 & int1 -> int2: {D}{b}; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that that the chiropractor is not a onager and/or does not idle is true is not right. | ¬(¬{D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) | [
"sent9 -> int3: if the immigrant does bitt Desmodium the fact that it is not brahminic and is not a octoroon is not true.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the chiropractor is not a kind of a onager and/or does not idle. ; $context$ = sent1: the pip is nonclassical and it is nonprofessional if it is not a octoroon. sent2: the chiropractor is either not a onager or an idle or both if the immigrant is a onager. sent3: either the chiropractor is not a onager or it does idle or both if something is classical. sent4: if the immigrant is a kind of an instrument then it does bitt Desmodium. sent5: the immigrant is a kind of a onager if the pip is either not nonprofessional or nonclassical or both. sent6: the immigrant is a onager if the pip is not nonprofessional. sent7: if the immigrant is a onager the chiropractor is either not a onager or not idle or both. sent8: the pip is not a octoroon if the fact that the immigrant is a kind of non-brahminic thing that is not a octoroon is false. sent9: that something is a kind of non-brahminic thing that is not a kind of a octoroon does not hold if it bitts Desmodium. sent10: that the pip is not nonprofessional and/or it is nonclassical hold if there is something such that it is not crustal. sent11: there exists something such that it is not crustal. sent12: there is something such that it is not a onager. ; $proof$ = | sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the pip is not nonprofessional or is nonclassical or both.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: that the immigrant is a kind of a onager hold.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the masochist is non-perigonal is not incorrect. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: if that the mung is perigonal is not incorrect then that the masochist is not minus is right. sent2: the masochist is a Austrian and it is a pogonia. sent3: the mung is not non-minus. sent4: that the mung is arthralgic and it is minus is right. sent5: if the mung is not arthralgic and is not perigonal then the masochist is not arthralgic. sent6: that the mung is both not minus and perigonal is wrong if that it is fictile hold. sent7: the singer is not syncretic or it keratinizes tufted or both. sent8: something is not non-perigonal and not non-arthralgic if it is not minus. | sent1: {C}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: ({BR}{b} & {AI}{b}) sent3: {B}{a} sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent6: {F}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent7: (¬{E}{c} v {D}{c}) sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the mung is arthralgic.;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{a};"
]
| the masochist is perigonal. | {C}{b} | [
"sent8 -> int2: if the mung is not minus it is not non-perigonal and it is arthralgic.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the masochist is non-perigonal is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the mung is perigonal is not incorrect then that the masochist is not minus is right. sent2: the masochist is a Austrian and it is a pogonia. sent3: the mung is not non-minus. sent4: that the mung is arthralgic and it is minus is right. sent5: if the mung is not arthralgic and is not perigonal then the masochist is not arthralgic. sent6: that the mung is both not minus and perigonal is wrong if that it is fictile hold. sent7: the singer is not syncretic or it keratinizes tufted or both. sent8: something is not non-perigonal and not non-arthralgic if it is not minus. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the mung is arthralgic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the freezing lenience but not the larceny happens. | ({C} & ¬{A}) | sent1: the fact that if the clawback happens the fact that the moot does not occur and the assessment does not occur is not true is right. sent2: if the cerousness does not occur that the clawback does not occur but the Best happens does not hold. sent3: the conceptualization does not occur and the keratinizing orthogonality happens. sent4: the clawback happens if that the clawback does not occur and the Best happens is false. sent5: that the keratinizing micrometer but not the chirp occurs is brought about by the non-hotness. sent6: if the fact that the larceny happens but the freezing lenience does not occur is not correct then the larceny does not occur. sent7: if the glomming does not occur the Albanianness occurs or the calmness does not occur or both. sent8: if the Albanianness does not occur then the fact that the calmness and the freezing recognition happens hold. sent9: the fact that the freezing lenience happens and the larceny does not occur is incorrect if the freezing recognition happens. sent10: the larceny does not occur if the freezing recognition does not occur. sent11: if the chirp does not occur then that the prenatalness occurs and the pietisticness happens is not true. sent12: the larceny does not occur. sent13: the isolation does not occur but the freezing birdnesting occurs if the larceny does not occur. sent14: if the freezing recognition does not occur then the freezing lenience but not the larceny happens. sent15: the keratinizing orthogonality occurs. sent16: if the recapture occurs then the Albanianness does not occur and the glomming does not occur. sent17: if that the premeditating does not occur is correct then the fact that the backhander does not occur but the exudation occurs is correct. sent18: the premeditating does not occur if the fact that the prenatalness happens and the pietisticness occurs is not correct. sent19: the hotness does not occur if the fact that the moot does not occur and the assessment does not occur is incorrect. sent20: that the larceny occurs and the freezing lenience does not occur is false if the fact that the freezing recognition happens is not incorrect. sent21: the freezing recognition is prevented by that the conceptualization does not occur but the keratinizing orthogonality occurs. sent22: if the backhander does not occur the nonmodernness happens and the recapture occurs. | sent1: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & ¬{Q}) sent2: ¬{U} -> ¬(¬{S} & {T}) sent3: (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬(¬{S} & {T}) -> {S} sent5: ¬{P} -> ({O} & ¬{N}) sent6: ¬({A} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} sent7: ¬{F} -> ({E} v ¬{D}) sent8: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {B}) sent9: {B} -> ¬({C} & ¬{A}) sent10: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent11: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & {M}) sent12: ¬{A} sent13: ¬{A} -> (¬{EM} & {DF}) sent14: ¬{B} -> ({C} & ¬{A}) sent15: {AB} sent16: {G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent17: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) sent18: ¬({L} & {M}) -> ¬{K} sent19: ¬(¬{R} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{P} sent20: {B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) sent21: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent22: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) | [
"sent21 & sent3 -> int1: the freezing recognition does not occur.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent21 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the isolation does not occur and the freezing birdnesting happens. | (¬{EM} & {DF}) | []
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the freezing lenience but not the larceny happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the clawback happens the fact that the moot does not occur and the assessment does not occur is not true is right. sent2: if the cerousness does not occur that the clawback does not occur but the Best happens does not hold. sent3: the conceptualization does not occur and the keratinizing orthogonality happens. sent4: the clawback happens if that the clawback does not occur and the Best happens is false. sent5: that the keratinizing micrometer but not the chirp occurs is brought about by the non-hotness. sent6: if the fact that the larceny happens but the freezing lenience does not occur is not correct then the larceny does not occur. sent7: if the glomming does not occur the Albanianness occurs or the calmness does not occur or both. sent8: if the Albanianness does not occur then the fact that the calmness and the freezing recognition happens hold. sent9: the fact that the freezing lenience happens and the larceny does not occur is incorrect if the freezing recognition happens. sent10: the larceny does not occur if the freezing recognition does not occur. sent11: if the chirp does not occur then that the prenatalness occurs and the pietisticness happens is not true. sent12: the larceny does not occur. sent13: the isolation does not occur but the freezing birdnesting occurs if the larceny does not occur. sent14: if the freezing recognition does not occur then the freezing lenience but not the larceny happens. sent15: the keratinizing orthogonality occurs. sent16: if the recapture occurs then the Albanianness does not occur and the glomming does not occur. sent17: if that the premeditating does not occur is correct then the fact that the backhander does not occur but the exudation occurs is correct. sent18: the premeditating does not occur if the fact that the prenatalness happens and the pietisticness occurs is not correct. sent19: the hotness does not occur if the fact that the moot does not occur and the assessment does not occur is incorrect. sent20: that the larceny occurs and the freezing lenience does not occur is false if the fact that the freezing recognition happens is not incorrect. sent21: the freezing recognition is prevented by that the conceptualization does not occur but the keratinizing orthogonality occurs. sent22: if the backhander does not occur the nonmodernness happens and the recapture occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent21 & sent3 -> int1: the freezing recognition does not occur.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the arthrospore is not an inventor but it is a kind of a calcium-cyanamide is right. | (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | sent1: the arthrospore is a palfrey. sent2: the medication is not a waffle. sent3: the fact that something is not a palfrey and is equitable is wrong if it is a topicality. sent4: the arthrospore is not an inventor. sent5: the bunkmate is a kind of a palfrey but it is not a hagiography. sent6: if the medication is Delphic the arthrospore is a topicality. sent7: if something is equitable the fact that it is not an inventor and is a calcium-cyanamide is false. sent8: something is Delphic if it is a hagiography. sent9: if the arthrospore is an inventor it is not a palfrey. sent10: if the bunkmate is a kind of a palfrey that is not a hagiography the medication is not a palfrey. sent11: if something is not a kind of a waffle it is Abkhaz thing that is a kind of a hagiography. | sent1: {B}{a} sent2: ¬{G}{b} sent3: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) sent4: ¬{AA}{a} sent5: ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent6: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent9: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent10: ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent11: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x & {E}x) | []
| []
| the pavior is an inventor. | {AA}{p} | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the arthrospore is a topicality that it is not a palfrey and is equitable is not true.; sent8 -> int2: if the medication is a hagiography it is Delphic.; sent11 -> int3: if the medication is not a waffle it is a kind of a Abkhaz and is a hagiography.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the medication is a kind of a Abkhaz and it is a hagiography.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the medication is a hagiography hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: that the medication is not Delphic is not right.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: that the arthrospore is a topicality is correct.; int1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the arthrospore is both not a palfrey and equitable is not correct.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a palfrey and it is equitable is wrong.;"
]
| 8 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the arthrospore is not an inventor but it is a kind of a calcium-cyanamide is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the arthrospore is a palfrey. sent2: the medication is not a waffle. sent3: the fact that something is not a palfrey and is equitable is wrong if it is a topicality. sent4: the arthrospore is not an inventor. sent5: the bunkmate is a kind of a palfrey but it is not a hagiography. sent6: if the medication is Delphic the arthrospore is a topicality. sent7: if something is equitable the fact that it is not an inventor and is a calcium-cyanamide is false. sent8: something is Delphic if it is a hagiography. sent9: if the arthrospore is an inventor it is not a palfrey. sent10: if the bunkmate is a kind of a palfrey that is not a hagiography the medication is not a palfrey. sent11: if something is not a kind of a waffle it is Abkhaz thing that is a kind of a hagiography. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the snook is not a Asuncion. | ¬{A}{aa} | sent1: the resonance is a detour and it is a kind of a Carroll. sent2: everything bases and it does steep miniskirt. sent3: the dubbin is a Carroll and it is mini. sent4: the snook is both a fade and thrifty. sent5: the lysozyme is a Asuncion. sent6: the fact that the snook is a kind of a Carroll that is a Asuncion is incorrect if the rickey does not keratinize Morristown. sent7: the fact that the browse is a Carroll hold if that the rickey is both not a Carroll and not a Asuncion is wrong. sent8: the snook is a Carroll. sent9: everything is tamed and it does steep toehold. sent10: if the fact that something is a Carroll and it is a Asuncion is not true it is not a Asuncion. sent11: everything is a kind of a valuation that does freeze fohn. sent12: the snook is a computer. sent13: everything is a Asuncion and a Carroll. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is repeatable and non-botryoid. sent15: the snook does flame and it is a aquatics. sent16: that everything is a Carroll is correct. | sent1: ({IE}{hg} & {B}{hg}) sent2: (x): ({IQ}x & {EQ}x) sent3: ({B}{d} & {HM}{d}) sent4: ({AN}{aa} & {BC}{aa}) sent5: {A}{id} sent6: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent7: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {B}{jk} sent8: {B}{aa} sent9: (x): ({GH}x & {FJ}x) sent10: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent11: (x): ({AG}x & {AJ}x) sent12: {JG}{aa} sent13: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) sent14: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) sent15: ({HR}{aa} & {IU}{aa}) sent16: (x): {B}x | [
"sent13 -> int1: the snook is a kind of a Asuncion and it is a Carroll.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> int1: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the snook is not a Asuncion. | ¬{A}{aa} | [
"sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the snook is a Carroll and a Asuncion is false then it is not a Asuncion.; sent14 -> int3: the fact that the drafter is not unrepeatable but it is not botryoid is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that that it is repeatable and it is not botryoid is not incorrect does not hold.;"
]
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the snook is not a Asuncion. ; $context$ = sent1: the resonance is a detour and it is a kind of a Carroll. sent2: everything bases and it does steep miniskirt. sent3: the dubbin is a Carroll and it is mini. sent4: the snook is both a fade and thrifty. sent5: the lysozyme is a Asuncion. sent6: the fact that the snook is a kind of a Carroll that is a Asuncion is incorrect if the rickey does not keratinize Morristown. sent7: the fact that the browse is a Carroll hold if that the rickey is both not a Carroll and not a Asuncion is wrong. sent8: the snook is a Carroll. sent9: everything is tamed and it does steep toehold. sent10: if the fact that something is a Carroll and it is a Asuncion is not true it is not a Asuncion. sent11: everything is a kind of a valuation that does freeze fohn. sent12: the snook is a computer. sent13: everything is a Asuncion and a Carroll. sent14: there exists nothing such that it is repeatable and non-botryoid. sent15: the snook does flame and it is a aquatics. sent16: that everything is a Carroll is correct. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> int1: the snook is a kind of a Asuncion and it is a Carroll.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that the fact that it is not electronic and it is not a decentralization does not hold is not true. | ¬((Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x)) | sent1: that that the tampion is not electronic and it is not a kind of a decentralization is not correct is correct if there is something such that it is not a burrow. sent2: something does not burrow. | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the tampion is not electronic and not a decentralization does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that the fact that it is not electronic and it is not a decentralization does not hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the tampion is not electronic and it is not a kind of a decentralization is not correct is correct if there is something such that it is not a burrow. sent2: something does not burrow. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the tampion is not electronic and not a decentralization does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | something is not a kind of a praenomen and is not cecal. | (Ex): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) | sent1: the advisee is both not a Munch and not stereoscopic. sent2: there exists something such that it does not keratinize confrontation. sent3: the advisee is not a praenomen if there is something such that it does not cram. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a saddle and it is not preprandial. sent5: something does not cram. sent6: something does cram. sent7: if something does not cram the advisee is not a praenomen and it is not cecal. sent8: the fact that the advisee is a kind of worthy thing that is not diagnostic is right. sent9: there are non-cecal things. sent10: the advisee is not a praenomen. | sent1: (¬{F}{a} & ¬{IP}{a}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{DI}x sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: (Ex): (¬{IJ}x & ¬{IN}x) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (¬{GO}{a} & ¬{IR}{a}) sent9: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent10: ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the advisee is not a praenomen and it is non-cecal.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent7 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = something is not a kind of a praenomen and is not cecal. ; $context$ = sent1: the advisee is both not a Munch and not stereoscopic. sent2: there exists something such that it does not keratinize confrontation. sent3: the advisee is not a praenomen if there is something such that it does not cram. sent4: there exists something such that it is not a saddle and it is not preprandial. sent5: something does not cram. sent6: something does cram. sent7: if something does not cram the advisee is not a praenomen and it is not cecal. sent8: the fact that the advisee is a kind of worthy thing that is not diagnostic is right. sent9: there are non-cecal things. sent10: the advisee is not a praenomen. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent7 -> int1: the advisee is not a praenomen and it is non-cecal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the guacamole is non-Mormons and is not a Bolshevism. | (¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) | sent1: if something is distal then it is not cloudy. sent2: the guacamole does steep leopardess and is distal. sent3: if the guacamole is a Bolshevism then it is not a gaminess. sent4: something is not a tonic if it is a kind of an alsatian. sent5: that the guacamole is not a Bolshevism but it does keratinize petroglyph does not hold if that it is not noncausative is not wrong. sent6: the coolant is a kind of a venture and it is a nudism. sent7: the fact that the fact that the pullulation is not distal and it is not shockable is true does not hold. sent8: the guacamole is not noncausative. sent9: that if something is not cloudy then that it is not a Mormons and it is not a Bolshevism is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: that if something is a gaminess it is not servomechanical is not wrong. | sent1: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent3: {D}{a} -> ¬{BL}{a} sent4: (x): {HA}x -> ¬{DO}x sent5: ¬{BH}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {GH}{a}) sent6: ({DQ}{dj} & {BQ}{dj}) sent7: ¬(¬{B}{ik} & ¬{FH}{ik}) sent8: ¬{BH}{a} sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) sent10: (x): {BL}x -> ¬{GS}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the guacamole is distal.; sent1 -> int2: if the guacamole is distal then it is not cloudy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guacamole is not cloudy.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the guacamole is not a kind of a Mormons and is not a kind of a Bolshevism is not right if it is not cloudy.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent1 -> int2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; sent9 -> int4: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the guacamole is non-Mormons and is not a Bolshevism. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is distal then it is not cloudy. sent2: the guacamole does steep leopardess and is distal. sent3: if the guacamole is a Bolshevism then it is not a gaminess. sent4: something is not a tonic if it is a kind of an alsatian. sent5: that the guacamole is not a Bolshevism but it does keratinize petroglyph does not hold if that it is not noncausative is not wrong. sent6: the coolant is a kind of a venture and it is a nudism. sent7: the fact that the fact that the pullulation is not distal and it is not shockable is true does not hold. sent8: the guacamole is not noncausative. sent9: that if something is not cloudy then that it is not a Mormons and it is not a Bolshevism is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: that if something is a gaminess it is not servomechanical is not wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the guacamole is distal.; sent1 -> int2: if the guacamole is distal then it is not cloudy.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the guacamole is not cloudy.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the guacamole is not a kind of a Mormons and is not a kind of a Bolshevism is not right if it is not cloudy.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it is not nonsurgical hold then it does not decrepitate and is not papillary. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: if that the alkene is not nonsurgical hold it does not decrepitate. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not steep alkene it is not a kind of a puerpera and it is not a kind of a cashew. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not nonsurgical it does decrepitate and is non-papillary. sent4: if that the alkene is not nonsurgical is not incorrect it does not decrepitate and is papillary. sent5: there exists something such that if it is surgical it is not papillary. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is pregnant is correct then it is not a hijab and is not adactylous. sent7: there is something such that if it is not nonsurgical it does not decrepitate and it is papillary. sent8: the alkene does not decrepitate and it is not papillary if it is nonsurgical. sent9: a non-genetic thing does not steep beguilement and is not arboreal. sent10: something does not steep sawhorse and is not a kind of a mouthbreeder if it is not a kind of a note. sent11: the alkene does not decrepitate and is not papillary if it is surgical. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not freeze girl it does not freeze butler and it is a kind of a mudskipper. sent13: there exists something such that if it is surgical then it does not decrepitate. | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ¬{DR}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{IO}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent6: (Ex): {AQ}x -> (¬{AM}x & ¬{BI}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: (x): ¬{BG}x -> (¬{CA}x & ¬{GL}x) sent10: (x): ¬{DH}x -> (¬{CT}x & ¬{GD}x) sent11: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent12: (Ex): ¬{IN}x -> (¬{FP}x & {E}x) sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x | [
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it is not genetic it does not steep beguilement and is not arboreal. | (Ex): ¬{BG}x -> (¬{CA}x & ¬{GL}x) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the dermatologist does not steep beguilement and it is not arboreal if the fact that it is not genetic hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not nonsurgical hold then it does not decrepitate and is not papillary. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the alkene is not nonsurgical hold it does not decrepitate. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not steep alkene it is not a kind of a puerpera and it is not a kind of a cashew. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not nonsurgical it does decrepitate and is non-papillary. sent4: if that the alkene is not nonsurgical is not incorrect it does not decrepitate and is papillary. sent5: there exists something such that if it is surgical it is not papillary. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is pregnant is correct then it is not a hijab and is not adactylous. sent7: there is something such that if it is not nonsurgical it does not decrepitate and it is papillary. sent8: the alkene does not decrepitate and it is not papillary if it is nonsurgical. sent9: a non-genetic thing does not steep beguilement and is not arboreal. sent10: something does not steep sawhorse and is not a kind of a mouthbreeder if it is not a kind of a note. sent11: the alkene does not decrepitate and is not papillary if it is surgical. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not freeze girl it does not freeze butler and it is a kind of a mudskipper. sent13: there exists something such that if it is surgical then it does not decrepitate. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the infanticide does not freeze housedog. | ¬{C}{c} | sent1: the cangue does not freeze housedog. sent2: the psilomelane does freeze housedog. sent3: that if something freezes floss then that it is not a swab is not false is correct. sent4: the fact that the cangue is unfamiliar is correct. sent5: the cangue is not invitational. sent6: that the infanticide is a kind of non-unfamiliar thing that is barytic does not hold if the endodontist delivers. sent7: the endodontist is eschatological. sent8: if the cangue is a Lorca the fact that the endodontist is not barytic but it is unfamiliar does not hold. sent9: that the endodontist does not freeze housedog and does deliver is false. sent10: if the fact that something does not deliver and is a Lorca is not correct it is not barytic. sent11: something is not barytic if that it is not a kind of a Lorca and does freeze housedog is false. sent12: the infanticide freezes housedog if the endodontist does not deliver. sent13: something does not deliver if that it is both not barytic and not familiar is false. sent14: that the endodontist is barytic and it is unfamiliar is wrong. sent15: that the endodontist is a Lorca if the cangue is not barytic is right. sent16: the cangue is a Lorca. sent17: if the infanticide is not a Lorca the cangue freezes housedog. sent18: if something is barytic then it does not freeze housedog. | sent1: ¬{C}{a} sent2: {C}{gk} sent3: (x): {BG}x -> ¬{GF}x sent4: {AB}{a} sent5: ¬{HP}{a} sent6: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{c} & {AA}{c}) sent7: {FF}{b} sent8: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent9: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent11: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent12: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent14: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent15: ¬{AA}{a} -> {A}{b} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: ¬{A}{c} -> {C}{a} sent18: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent8 & sent16 -> int1: that the endodontist is both not barytic and unfamiliar is false.; sent13 -> int2: the endodontist does not deliver if the fact that it is not barytic and it is unfamiliar does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the endodontist does not deliver hold.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent8 & sent16 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent13 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the infanticide does not freeze housedog. ; $context$ = sent1: the cangue does not freeze housedog. sent2: the psilomelane does freeze housedog. sent3: that if something freezes floss then that it is not a swab is not false is correct. sent4: the fact that the cangue is unfamiliar is correct. sent5: the cangue is not invitational. sent6: that the infanticide is a kind of non-unfamiliar thing that is barytic does not hold if the endodontist delivers. sent7: the endodontist is eschatological. sent8: if the cangue is a Lorca the fact that the endodontist is not barytic but it is unfamiliar does not hold. sent9: that the endodontist does not freeze housedog and does deliver is false. sent10: if the fact that something does not deliver and is a Lorca is not correct it is not barytic. sent11: something is not barytic if that it is not a kind of a Lorca and does freeze housedog is false. sent12: the infanticide freezes housedog if the endodontist does not deliver. sent13: something does not deliver if that it is both not barytic and not familiar is false. sent14: that the endodontist is barytic and it is unfamiliar is wrong. sent15: that the endodontist is a Lorca if the cangue is not barytic is right. sent16: the cangue is a Lorca. sent17: if the infanticide is not a Lorca the cangue freezes housedog. sent18: if something is barytic then it does not freeze housedog. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent16 -> int1: that the endodontist is both not barytic and unfamiliar is false.; sent13 -> int2: the endodontist does not deliver if the fact that it is not barytic and it is unfamiliar does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the endodontist does not deliver hold.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the schoolmate is not a kind of a spoil or it freezes linkboy or both. | (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) | sent1: something freezes estradiol if the fact that it is a abampere and it does not freezes estradiol does not hold. sent2: that the Muscat is a abampere and does not freeze estradiol does not hold if the margay is a riposte. sent3: if something does not freeze estradiol the Muscat is a abampere and does riposte. sent4: if the Muscat is a abampere the schoolmate is not a spoil and/or freezes linkboy. sent5: the schoolmate either does spoil or freezes linkboy or both if the Muscat is a kind of a abampere. sent6: something does spoil. | sent1: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x sent2: {C}{c} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: {B}{a} -> (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) sent5: {B}{a} -> ({E}{b} v {D}{b}) sent6: (Ex): {E}x | []
| []
| that the schoolmate is not a spoil and/or it freezes linkboy is incorrect. | ¬(¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: if that the Muscat is a kind of a abampere and does not freeze estradiol is not right then it freeze estradiol.;"
]
| 6 | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the schoolmate is not a kind of a spoil or it freezes linkboy or both. ; $context$ = sent1: something freezes estradiol if the fact that it is a abampere and it does not freezes estradiol does not hold. sent2: that the Muscat is a abampere and does not freeze estradiol does not hold if the margay is a riposte. sent3: if something does not freeze estradiol the Muscat is a abampere and does riposte. sent4: if the Muscat is a abampere the schoolmate is not a spoil and/or freezes linkboy. sent5: the schoolmate either does spoil or freezes linkboy or both if the Muscat is a kind of a abampere. sent6: something does spoil. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the molt is not batholithic. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: something that does not freeze confrontation and does not steep siamese is not a returning. sent2: the siamese is a kind of a returning. sent3: the siamese is both a pepperwort and intervertebral. sent4: that the siamese steeps siamese and freezes confrontation is not right. sent5: something is batholithic if it is not a nipa. sent6: if that the siamese does steep siamese and does not freeze confrontation is not correct then it does rat. sent7: the fact that the MA is Parthian but it does not freeze cutworm does not hold. sent8: the fact that the fact that the siamese does steep siamese and does not freeze confrontation is not false is false. sent9: the fact that the molt is not batholithic if the siamese is a rat that is a kind of a nipa is not false. sent10: if the siamese is not a returning then that the molt is a nipa and it does rat does not hold. | sent1: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: {B}{a} sent3: ({HB}{a} & {BC}{a}) sent4: ¬({E}{a} & {F}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> {D}x sent6: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> {C}{a} sent7: ¬({CC}{hf} & ¬{EB}{hf}) sent8: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) sent9: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent10: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | [
"sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the siamese is a rat.;"
]
| [
"sent6 & sent8 -> int1: {C}{a};"
]
| the molt is batholithic. | {D}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int2: the molt is batholithic if it is not a nipa.; sent1 -> int3: the siamese does not return if it does not freeze confrontation and does not steep siamese.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the molt is not batholithic. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not freeze confrontation and does not steep siamese is not a returning. sent2: the siamese is a kind of a returning. sent3: the siamese is both a pepperwort and intervertebral. sent4: that the siamese steeps siamese and freezes confrontation is not right. sent5: something is batholithic if it is not a nipa. sent6: if that the siamese does steep siamese and does not freeze confrontation is not correct then it does rat. sent7: the fact that the MA is Parthian but it does not freeze cutworm does not hold. sent8: the fact that the fact that the siamese does steep siamese and does not freeze confrontation is not false is false. sent9: the fact that the molt is not batholithic if the siamese is a rat that is a kind of a nipa is not false. sent10: if the siamese is not a returning then that the molt is a nipa and it does rat does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the siamese is a rat.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the keratinizing atorvastatin occurs is not false. | {D} | sent1: if the fact that both the keratinizing absorptance and the non-neuroticness occurs is incorrect the fact that the nondisposableness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the viralness does not occur. sent3: the timework happens. sent4: if the whiting occurs then the keratinizing work-shirt happens. sent5: if the benignity does not occur the spending happens. sent6: that the bitting eelworm does not occur is triggered by that the radial does not occur or the Rooseveltianness does not occur or both. sent7: if the nondisposableness does not occur then the heater but not the keratinizing decalcification happens. sent8: if the fact that the allopatricness does not occur is not wrong the fact that the keratinizing absorptance occurs and the neurotic does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the keratinizing decalcification occurs then the heater occurs. sent10: the rings happens. sent11: if the fact that the keratinizing divi-divi happens hold then the closed-circuitness occurs. sent12: the fact that the keratinizing atorvastatin does not occur is true if the viralness occurs and the keratinizing decalcification happens. sent13: if the bitting eelworm does not occur the fact that the diabeticness and the steeping megawatt occurs does not hold. sent14: the grip does not occur. sent15: that the notching does not occur is prevented by the hydroelectricity. sent16: the keratinizing dilutant occurs. sent17: the civility happens if the fact that the tuberousness does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: that the keratinizing decalcification does not occur is prevented by that the viralness does not occur. sent19: the sit-down occurs. sent20: if the steeping Pennsylvanian happens the keratinizing length happens. sent21: that the Caliphate occurs is caused by the non-premenstrualness. sent22: the allopatricness does not occur if that both the diabetic and the steeping megawatt occurs is wrong. sent23: the keratinizing atorvastatin occurs if the heater occurs. | sent1: ¬({F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} sent2: ¬{A} sent3: {ES} sent4: {N} -> {DJ} sent5: ¬{EL} -> {BB} sent6: (¬{M} v ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent7: ¬{E} -> ({C} & ¬{B}) sent8: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & ¬{G}) sent9: {B} -> {C} sent10: {R} sent11: {CF} -> {FU} sent12: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{D} sent13: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {J}) sent14: ¬{FO} sent15: {ED} -> {AE} sent16: {JF} sent17: ¬{CL} -> {II} sent18: ¬{A} -> {B} sent19: {AI} sent20: {IM} -> {BR} sent21: ¬{GK} -> {DA} sent22: ¬({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} sent23: {C} -> {D} | [
"sent18 & sent2 -> int1: the keratinizing decalcification happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the heater occurs.; sent23 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent18 & sent2 -> int1: {B}; sent9 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent23 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the keratinizing atorvastatin does not occur. | ¬{D} | []
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the keratinizing atorvastatin occurs is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the keratinizing absorptance and the non-neuroticness occurs is incorrect the fact that the nondisposableness does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the viralness does not occur. sent3: the timework happens. sent4: if the whiting occurs then the keratinizing work-shirt happens. sent5: if the benignity does not occur the spending happens. sent6: that the bitting eelworm does not occur is triggered by that the radial does not occur or the Rooseveltianness does not occur or both. sent7: if the nondisposableness does not occur then the heater but not the keratinizing decalcification happens. sent8: if the fact that the allopatricness does not occur is not wrong the fact that the keratinizing absorptance occurs and the neurotic does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the keratinizing decalcification occurs then the heater occurs. sent10: the rings happens. sent11: if the fact that the keratinizing divi-divi happens hold then the closed-circuitness occurs. sent12: the fact that the keratinizing atorvastatin does not occur is true if the viralness occurs and the keratinizing decalcification happens. sent13: if the bitting eelworm does not occur the fact that the diabeticness and the steeping megawatt occurs does not hold. sent14: the grip does not occur. sent15: that the notching does not occur is prevented by the hydroelectricity. sent16: the keratinizing dilutant occurs. sent17: the civility happens if the fact that the tuberousness does not occur is not incorrect. sent18: that the keratinizing decalcification does not occur is prevented by that the viralness does not occur. sent19: the sit-down occurs. sent20: if the steeping Pennsylvanian happens the keratinizing length happens. sent21: that the Caliphate occurs is caused by the non-premenstrualness. sent22: the allopatricness does not occur if that both the diabetic and the steeping megawatt occurs is wrong. sent23: the keratinizing atorvastatin occurs if the heater occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent18 & sent2 -> int1: the keratinizing decalcification happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the heater occurs.; sent23 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the thread is a Lithuanian. | {D}{b} | sent1: the sowbane is a kind of a Lithuanian if the thread is a ambusher. sent2: The defeatist does keratinize sowbane. sent3: something is a ambusher and it is Lithuanian if it does not steep sowbane. sent4: the sowbane does keratinize defeatist. sent5: the sowbane is unidentifiable. sent6: if that the edge is identifiable is not wrong then that the sowbane does not keratinize defeatist and is a Lithuanian is wrong. sent7: if something is not a ambusher then that it steeps sowbane and it is unidentifiable is incorrect. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it steeps sowbane and is unidentifiable does not hold the edge is not unidentifiable. sent9: the thread is a ambusher. | sent1: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} sent2: {AA}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent4: {B}{a} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) sent8: (x): ¬({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}{c} sent9: {E}{b} | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the sowbane is unidentifiable and it keratinizes defeatist.; sent3 -> int2: if the thread does not steep sowbane then it is a kind of a ambusher and it is a Lithuanian.;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent3 -> int2: ¬{C}{b} -> ({E}{b} & {D}{b});"
]
| the thread is not a kind of a Lithuanian. | ¬{D}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int3: if the gammon is not a ambusher then that it does steep sowbane and it is unidentifiable is false.;"
]
| 7 | 4 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the thread is a Lithuanian. ; $context$ = sent1: the sowbane is a kind of a Lithuanian if the thread is a ambusher. sent2: The defeatist does keratinize sowbane. sent3: something is a ambusher and it is Lithuanian if it does not steep sowbane. sent4: the sowbane does keratinize defeatist. sent5: the sowbane is unidentifiable. sent6: if that the edge is identifiable is not wrong then that the sowbane does not keratinize defeatist and is a Lithuanian is wrong. sent7: if something is not a ambusher then that it steeps sowbane and it is unidentifiable is incorrect. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it steeps sowbane and is unidentifiable does not hold the edge is not unidentifiable. sent9: the thread is a ambusher. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the sowbane is unidentifiable and it keratinizes defeatist.; sent3 -> int2: if the thread does not steep sowbane then it is a kind of a ambusher and it is a Lithuanian.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the interstitialness does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: the steeping fore-and-after does not occur but the pooling occurs. sent2: both the debuting and the break happens. sent3: if the fact that the hummer does not occur but the keratinizing coville occurs is not false then the interstitialness does not occur. sent4: the gastronomy happens. sent5: the Sabahanness happens. sent6: the freezing whorehouse does not occur. sent7: that both the non-subatomicness and the lethargicness occurs prevents the perigonalness. sent8: if that the interstitialness does not occur and the bardolatry does not occur is not true then the fact that the interstitialness happens is correct. sent9: the basing does not occur. sent10: the freezing rollerblader happens. sent11: that the debuting happens and the breaking happens results in that the bardolatry does not occur. sent12: the freezing Demulen and the monisticness occurs. sent13: if the paraphrase and the socioculturalness occurs then the Shonaness does not occur. sent14: that both the hummer and the keratinizing coville occurs is not false if the herding does not occur. sent15: the fattening happens. | sent1: (¬{FJ} & {IE}) sent2: ({AA} & {AB}) sent3: (¬{C} & {A}) -> ¬{D} sent4: {BP} sent5: {BO} sent6: ¬{DR} sent7: (¬{DD} & {CS}) -> ¬{DM} sent8: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{B}) -> {D} sent9: ¬{FO} sent10: {IO} sent11: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent12: ({GU} & {I}) sent13: ({HE} & {FM}) -> ¬{IU} sent14: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {A}) sent15: {GO} | [
"sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the bardolatry does not occur.;"
]
| [
"sent11 & sent2 -> int1: ¬{B};"
]
| the interstitialness occurs. | {D} | []
| 7 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the interstitialness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the steeping fore-and-after does not occur but the pooling occurs. sent2: both the debuting and the break happens. sent3: if the fact that the hummer does not occur but the keratinizing coville occurs is not false then the interstitialness does not occur. sent4: the gastronomy happens. sent5: the Sabahanness happens. sent6: the freezing whorehouse does not occur. sent7: that both the non-subatomicness and the lethargicness occurs prevents the perigonalness. sent8: if that the interstitialness does not occur and the bardolatry does not occur is not true then the fact that the interstitialness happens is correct. sent9: the basing does not occur. sent10: the freezing rollerblader happens. sent11: that the debuting happens and the breaking happens results in that the bardolatry does not occur. sent12: the freezing Demulen and the monisticness occurs. sent13: if the paraphrase and the socioculturalness occurs then the Shonaness does not occur. sent14: that both the hummer and the keratinizing coville occurs is not false if the herding does not occur. sent15: the fattening happens. ; $proof$ = | sent11 & sent2 -> int1: the bardolatry does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the organza does not steep pacifism. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: if there exists something such that that it does not narrow and it is a kind of a homogenization is not true then the profiteer is a kind of a Cockney. sent2: the fact that the pronghorn keratinizes vetchworm is not incorrect. sent3: that the fact that something does not narrow but it is a homogenization is not false is not true if it does keratinize vetchworm. sent4: if that the auditorium is not a neuropil and is not a goulash is incorrect the kennel does diphthongize. sent5: the squirrelfish is a kind of a jonah. sent6: the hemiplegic is photosynthetic. sent7: if something is a jonah it does steep pacifism. sent8: if something does freeze hemiplegic it does veneer. sent9: the hemiplegic steeps pacifism. sent10: something is a jonah if it is photosynthetic. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Cockney then the fact that the auditorium is not a kind of a neuropil and it is not a goulash is incorrect. sent12: if something does diphthongize the fact that it does ruckle is correct. sent13: that the hemiplegic is both not photosynthetic and not a jonah does not hold if the straight ruckles. sent14: if the fact that the kennel does ruckle is not incorrect then the straight ruckle. sent15: the organza is a kind of a jonah if the hemiplegic is photosynthetic. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {H}{f} sent2: {K}{g} sent3: (x): {K}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & {J}x) sent4: ¬(¬{F}{e} & ¬{G}{e}) -> {E}{d} sent5: {B}{ai} sent6: {A}{a} sent7: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent8: (x): {U}x -> {BS}x sent9: {C}{a} sent10: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent11: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}{e} & ¬{G}{e}) sent12: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent13: {D}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent14: {D}{d} -> {D}{c} sent15: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the organza is a jonah.; sent7 -> int2: the organza does steep pacifism if it is a kind of a jonah.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent15 & sent6 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent7 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the organza does not steep pacifism. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent12 -> int3: if the kennel diphthongizes it ruckles.; sent3 -> int4: the fact that the pronghorn is both not narrowed and a homogenization does not hold if it does keratinize vetchworm.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that that the pronghorn is not a kind of a narrowed but it is a homogenization does not hold is right.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-narrowed thing that is a homogenization is false.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the profiteer is a kind of a Cockney.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is Cockney.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: that the auditorium is both not a neuropil and not a goulash is wrong.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the kennel diphthongizes.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the kennel ruckles.; sent14 & int11 -> int12: the straight ruckles.; sent13 & int12 -> int13: that the hemiplegic is a kind of non-photosynthetic thing that is not a jonah does not hold.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not photosynthetic and not a jonah does not hold.;"
]
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the organza does not steep pacifism. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it does not narrow and it is a kind of a homogenization is not true then the profiteer is a kind of a Cockney. sent2: the fact that the pronghorn keratinizes vetchworm is not incorrect. sent3: that the fact that something does not narrow but it is a homogenization is not false is not true if it does keratinize vetchworm. sent4: if that the auditorium is not a neuropil and is not a goulash is incorrect the kennel does diphthongize. sent5: the squirrelfish is a kind of a jonah. sent6: the hemiplegic is photosynthetic. sent7: if something is a jonah it does steep pacifism. sent8: if something does freeze hemiplegic it does veneer. sent9: the hemiplegic steeps pacifism. sent10: something is a jonah if it is photosynthetic. sent11: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Cockney then the fact that the auditorium is not a kind of a neuropil and it is not a goulash is incorrect. sent12: if something does diphthongize the fact that it does ruckle is correct. sent13: that the hemiplegic is both not photosynthetic and not a jonah does not hold if the straight ruckles. sent14: if the fact that the kennel does ruckle is not incorrect then the straight ruckle. sent15: the organza is a kind of a jonah if the hemiplegic is photosynthetic. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent6 -> int1: the organza is a jonah.; sent7 -> int2: the organza does steep pacifism if it is a kind of a jonah.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the weigela does not populate and is not a serum is wrong. | ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) | sent1: the fact that something does not populate and is not a serum is not right if it is not a Bruneian. sent2: if the cutoff is sepulchral then the weigela is not a Bruneian. sent3: the fact that something is non-Marian an upgrade is wrong if it is not a Aethionema. sent4: everything is sepulchral. | sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{FI}x -> ¬(¬{GD}x & {IA}x) sent4: (x): {A}x | [
"sent4 -> int1: the cutoff is sepulchral.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the weigela is not a kind of a Bruneian.; sent1 -> int3: if the weigela is not a Bruneian the fact that it does not populate and it is not a serum is false.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{aa}; int1 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; sent1 -> int3: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the weigela does not populate and is not a serum is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not populate and is not a serum is not right if it is not a Bruneian. sent2: if the cutoff is sepulchral then the weigela is not a Bruneian. sent3: the fact that something is non-Marian an upgrade is wrong if it is not a Aethionema. sent4: everything is sepulchral. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the cutoff is sepulchral.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the weigela is not a kind of a Bruneian.; sent1 -> int3: if the weigela is not a Bruneian the fact that it does not populate and it is not a serum is false.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it rubrics then the fact that that it does not keratinize officiation and it freezes laminate hold is wrong. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: the fact that the redneck does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate is not right if it does rubric. sent2: that something is not noncombinative and freezes laminate does not hold if it does freeze scrub. sent3: that something is not a kind of a turgidity and is antipollution is wrong if the fact that it is a Romany is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a rubric the fact that it does keratinize officiation and does freeze laminate does not hold. sent5: that something does not rubric but it is contractual does not hold if it is a simony. sent6: the fact that the redneck does not steep Nitrobacter and is a profoundness is not true if it does steep Ammotragus. sent7: that the redneck is not a Myrtillocactus but a rubric is not true if it is a wagoner. sent8: the fact that the redneck does keratinize officiation and does freeze laminate is wrong if it is a rubric. sent9: if that the redneck does rubric is correct then it does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate. sent10: there is something such that if it rubrics it does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate. sent11: the fact that the fermium does not freeze laminate but it does freeze Hygeia is not right if it is a kind of a pallette. sent12: there is something such that if it is preprandial then the fact that the fact that it does not keratinize redneck and it is a factory is not false does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a fair then the fact that it is not a pimento and it steeps pastoral is incorrect. | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): {IU}x -> ¬(¬{DL}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): {CL}x -> ¬(¬{EC}x & {DR}x) sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (x): {IS}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {JJ}x) sent6: {HB}{aa} -> ¬(¬{GK}{aa} & {HI}{aa}) sent7: {AR}{aa} -> ¬(¬{JA}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent8: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: {L}{c} -> ¬(¬{AB}{c} & {DQ}{c}) sent12: (Ex): {FT}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {DD}x) sent13: (Ex): {DE}x -> ¬(¬{BK}x & {IP}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that there is something such that if it is a Romany the fact that it is not a turgidity and it is antipollution does not hold hold. | (Ex): {CL}x -> ¬(¬{EC}x & {DR}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the cockleshell is Romany the fact that it is not a turgidity and is antipollution is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it rubrics then the fact that that it does not keratinize officiation and it freezes laminate hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the redneck does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate is not right if it does rubric. sent2: that something is not noncombinative and freezes laminate does not hold if it does freeze scrub. sent3: that something is not a kind of a turgidity and is antipollution is wrong if the fact that it is a Romany is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a rubric the fact that it does keratinize officiation and does freeze laminate does not hold. sent5: that something does not rubric but it is contractual does not hold if it is a simony. sent6: the fact that the redneck does not steep Nitrobacter and is a profoundness is not true if it does steep Ammotragus. sent7: that the redneck is not a Myrtillocactus but a rubric is not true if it is a wagoner. sent8: the fact that the redneck does keratinize officiation and does freeze laminate is wrong if it is a rubric. sent9: if that the redneck does rubric is correct then it does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate. sent10: there is something such that if it rubrics it does not keratinize officiation and freezes laminate. sent11: the fact that the fermium does not freeze laminate but it does freeze Hygeia is not right if it is a kind of a pallette. sent12: there is something such that if it is preprandial then the fact that the fact that it does not keratinize redneck and it is a factory is not false does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a fair then the fact that it is not a pimento and it steeps pastoral is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful that is aneuploid is wrong. | ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: something is aneuploid if it does upload. sent2: there is something such that that it is a kind of a matchlock that does unmask is incorrect. sent3: if the workspace is not a kind of a shelfful the interoceptor is indistinguishable and it is neurogenic. sent4: if the workspace is not indistinguishable it is a platy. sent5: something is a shelfful if that it is not remediable or it is not a platy or both is not correct. sent6: the fact that something does not upload and it is not indistinguishable does not hold if it is not neurogenic. sent7: the fact that the workspace is not indistinguishable is correct. sent8: the workspace uploads and is neurogenic. sent9: the workspace is a platy. sent10: the fact that either the workspace is not remediable or it is not a kind of a platy or both is incorrect if it is not indistinguishable. sent11: the workspace is a shelfful if that it is not remediable and/or is a kind of a platy is incorrect. sent12: the workspace is neurogenic. sent13: if that either something is not remediable or it is a platy or both is not right then it is a kind of a shelfful. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a matchlock and uploads is not true that it is not aneuploid is not incorrect. | sent1: (x): {D}x -> {C}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({F}x & {G}x) sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{cu} & {E}{cu}) sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{A}x) sent7: ¬{A}{a} sent8: ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent9: {AB}{a} sent10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent11: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent12: {E}{a} sent13: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x sent14: (x): ¬({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent10 & sent7 -> int1: that the workspace is not remediable or is not a kind of a platy or both is incorrect.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful is correct if that either it is not remediable or it is not a platy or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful is correct.; sent1 -> int4: the workspace is aneuploid if it does upload.; sent8 -> int5: the workspace does upload.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the workspace is aneuploid.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent10 & sent7 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); sent5 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; sent1 -> int4: {D}{a} -> {C}{a}; sent8 -> int5: {D}{a}; int4 & int5 -> int6: {C}{a}; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the workspace is a shelfful and it is aneuploid is not right. | ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent6 -> int7: the fact that the redhead does not upload and is not indistinguishable is wrong if it is not neurogenic.;"
]
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful that is aneuploid is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is aneuploid if it does upload. sent2: there is something such that that it is a kind of a matchlock that does unmask is incorrect. sent3: if the workspace is not a kind of a shelfful the interoceptor is indistinguishable and it is neurogenic. sent4: if the workspace is not indistinguishable it is a platy. sent5: something is a shelfful if that it is not remediable or it is not a platy or both is not correct. sent6: the fact that something does not upload and it is not indistinguishable does not hold if it is not neurogenic. sent7: the fact that the workspace is not indistinguishable is correct. sent8: the workspace uploads and is neurogenic. sent9: the workspace is a platy. sent10: the fact that either the workspace is not remediable or it is not a kind of a platy or both is incorrect if it is not indistinguishable. sent11: the workspace is a shelfful if that it is not remediable and/or is a kind of a platy is incorrect. sent12: the workspace is neurogenic. sent13: if that either something is not remediable or it is a platy or both is not right then it is a kind of a shelfful. sent14: if the fact that something is a kind of a matchlock and uploads is not true that it is not aneuploid is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent7 -> int1: that the workspace is not remediable or is not a kind of a platy or both is incorrect.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful is correct if that either it is not remediable or it is not a platy or both does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the workspace is a kind of a shelfful is correct.; sent1 -> int4: the workspace is aneuploid if it does upload.; sent8 -> int5: the workspace does upload.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the workspace is aneuploid.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is pyrectic the fact that it is not a Conium and/or it is not a Sif is not right. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if it ghosts it either is not sublunar or is not undemocratic or both. sent2: something is a gumboil if it is a magnet. sent3: there exists something such that if that it freezes Brahman hold then it is knee-length. sent4: if the organza is crustal then it either is not a kind of a ghost or is not a Zimbabwean or both. sent5: that the ilmenite steeps nainsook and/or it is not iridaceous is not right if the fact that it is musicological is correct. sent6: that something is not a subjunctive and/or it is not wide is correct if it is a modem. sent7: if something is a Sufi it is a Majorana. sent8: the ilmenite is a sadist if it does furnish. sent9: the fact that the ilmenite is a Conium and/or it is not a Sif is not right if the fact that it is pyrectic is true. sent10: there is something such that if it is diligent then it is creaseproof. sent11: something does not steep quarrelsomeness and/or is non-thoughtful if it is ultimate. sent12: if the fact that the ilmenite is a kind of a anesthyl is right then either it is not a hat or it is not hyperbolic or both. sent13: the ilmenite does not steep hindfoot and/or it is not pyrectic if it lodges. sent14: there is something such that if it is iridaceous then that it is not a herd or it is not a Zimbabwean or both is wrong. sent15: if the sodom steeps virulence then it is a alendronate. sent16: if the ilmenite is a kind of a cornsilk then it does not shine and/or it is not a Sif. | sent1: (Ex): {JI}x -> (¬{FJ}x v ¬{HM}x) sent2: (x): {CE}x -> {DU}x sent3: (Ex): {AD}x -> {DA}x sent4: {BN}{fr} -> (¬{JI}{fr} v ¬{HF}{fr}) sent5: {EP}{aa} -> ¬({EM}{aa} v ¬{BO}{aa}) sent6: (x): {I}x -> (¬{BT}x v ¬{BU}x) sent7: (x): {BH}x -> {GF}x sent8: {HT}{aa} -> {CT}{aa} sent9: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: (Ex): {JD}x -> {EC}x sent11: (x): {AI}x -> (¬{GA}x v ¬{IP}x) sent12: {IQ}{aa} -> (¬{HG}{aa} v ¬{L}{aa}) sent13: {DC}{aa} -> (¬{CL}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) sent14: (Ex): {BO}x -> ¬(¬{IF}x v ¬{HF}x) sent15: {EQ}{dh} -> {IB}{dh} sent16: {C}{aa} -> (¬{FL}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | []
| []
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is pyrectic the fact that it is not a Conium and/or it is not a Sif is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it ghosts it either is not sublunar or is not undemocratic or both. sent2: something is a gumboil if it is a magnet. sent3: there exists something such that if that it freezes Brahman hold then it is knee-length. sent4: if the organza is crustal then it either is not a kind of a ghost or is not a Zimbabwean or both. sent5: that the ilmenite steeps nainsook and/or it is not iridaceous is not right if the fact that it is musicological is correct. sent6: that something is not a subjunctive and/or it is not wide is correct if it is a modem. sent7: if something is a Sufi it is a Majorana. sent8: the ilmenite is a sadist if it does furnish. sent9: the fact that the ilmenite is a Conium and/or it is not a Sif is not right if the fact that it is pyrectic is true. sent10: there is something such that if it is diligent then it is creaseproof. sent11: something does not steep quarrelsomeness and/or is non-thoughtful if it is ultimate. sent12: if the fact that the ilmenite is a kind of a anesthyl is right then either it is not a hat or it is not hyperbolic or both. sent13: the ilmenite does not steep hindfoot and/or it is not pyrectic if it lodges. sent14: there is something such that if it is iridaceous then that it is not a herd or it is not a Zimbabwean or both is wrong. sent15: if the sodom steeps virulence then it is a alendronate. sent16: if the ilmenite is a kind of a cornsilk then it does not shine and/or it is not a Sif. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is discriminatory it does not steep requisiteness. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x | sent1: there exists something such that if it is a antipyretic then it is not stoloniferous. sent2: something is not minors if it keratinizes S.U.V.. sent3: the cobalt does not steep requisiteness if it steeps Rollerblade. sent4: there is something such that if it freezes cobalt it does not freeze Ensete. sent5: if the cobalt is discriminatory it does not steep requisiteness. sent6: if something is diamagnetic then it is not discriminatory. sent7: the southeast steeps requisiteness if that it is chaetal is not wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is apocryphal it is anal. sent9: there is something such that if it does ramify then it is a bunch. sent10: there is something such that if it bitts Corinthian it is anamnestic. sent11: if the carpetbagger steeps requisiteness then it does rake. sent12: there is something such that if it buds it is superior. sent13: the cobalt does not scatter if it is inexpressible. sent14: there exists something such that if it fingerprints it is not a flume. sent15: if the cobalt is discriminatory then it steeps requisiteness. sent16: there exists something such that if it is flinty it is a sprinkler. sent17: there exists something such that if it is discriminatory then it does steep requisiteness. sent18: if the vestment is a kind of a bovine it does not steep requisiteness. sent19: there exists something such that if it is gutsy then it bitts Guangzhou. sent20: that there is something such that if it is a gearset then it is not a antipyretic is correct. sent21: the cobalt does not steep requisiteness if it is meteoritic. | sent1: (Ex): {I}x -> ¬{DP}x sent2: (x): {JA}x -> ¬{JH}x sent3: {CD}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent4: (Ex): {DC}x -> ¬{FP}x sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent6: (x): {HA}x -> ¬{A}x sent7: {N}{hg} -> {C}{hg} sent8: (Ex): {H}x -> {JF}x sent9: (Ex): {GN}x -> {R}x sent10: (Ex): {DM}x -> {JJ}x sent11: {C}{bh} -> {GH}{bh} sent12: (Ex): {FU}x -> {AF}x sent13: {FA}{aa} -> ¬{HC}{aa} sent14: (Ex): {IT}x -> ¬{HO}x sent15: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent16: (Ex): {EA}x -> {BU}x sent17: (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x sent18: {B}{fr} -> ¬{C}{fr} sent19: (Ex): {IU}x -> {IF}x sent20: (Ex): {JE}x -> ¬{I}x sent21: {HF}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the cobalt is not discriminatory if it is diamagnetic. | {HA}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is discriminatory it does not steep requisiteness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a antipyretic then it is not stoloniferous. sent2: something is not minors if it keratinizes S.U.V.. sent3: the cobalt does not steep requisiteness if it steeps Rollerblade. sent4: there is something such that if it freezes cobalt it does not freeze Ensete. sent5: if the cobalt is discriminatory it does not steep requisiteness. sent6: if something is diamagnetic then it is not discriminatory. sent7: the southeast steeps requisiteness if that it is chaetal is not wrong. sent8: there exists something such that if it is apocryphal it is anal. sent9: there is something such that if it does ramify then it is a bunch. sent10: there is something such that if it bitts Corinthian it is anamnestic. sent11: if the carpetbagger steeps requisiteness then it does rake. sent12: there is something such that if it buds it is superior. sent13: the cobalt does not scatter if it is inexpressible. sent14: there exists something such that if it fingerprints it is not a flume. sent15: if the cobalt is discriminatory then it steeps requisiteness. sent16: there exists something such that if it is flinty it is a sprinkler. sent17: there exists something such that if it is discriminatory then it does steep requisiteness. sent18: if the vestment is a kind of a bovine it does not steep requisiteness. sent19: there exists something such that if it is gutsy then it bitts Guangzhou. sent20: that there is something such that if it is a gearset then it is not a antipyretic is correct. sent21: the cobalt does not steep requisiteness if it is meteoritic. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | not the trembling but the pictographicness occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the spinalness does not occur if the fact that both the spinalness and the non-Laotianness happens is incorrect. sent2: that the historiography does not occur and the precociousness occurs is false. sent3: that the bedrest occurs is right. sent4: the deeming occurs. sent5: if the passing happens the managership occurs. sent6: that the steeping Hanukkah does not occur but the immunoassay happens is not right. sent7: that both the keratinizing almanac and the steeping cholesterol happens is false. sent8: the spinalness occurs if that the trembles does not occur and the pictographicness happens is incorrect. sent9: the kicking does not occur. sent10: that both the spinalness and the non-Laotianness happens is not right. sent11: that both the immunoassay and the reeling happens is incorrect. sent12: the divorcing does not occur. sent13: that the matinee does not occur and the freezing igloo happens is incorrect. | sent1: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬(¬{EK} & {FO}) sent3: {BN} sent4: {JI} sent5: {JH} -> {BR} sent6: ¬(¬{HS} & {HT}) sent7: ¬({T} & {M}) sent8: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent9: ¬{DP} sent10: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) sent11: ¬({HT} & {DG}) sent12: ¬{IR} sent13: ¬(¬{JJ} & {GL}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that not the trembles but the pictographicness occurs is false is not wrong.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the spinalness occurs.; sent1 & sent10 -> int2: the spinalness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent8 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent1 & sent10 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = not the trembling but the pictographicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the spinalness does not occur if the fact that both the spinalness and the non-Laotianness happens is incorrect. sent2: that the historiography does not occur and the precociousness occurs is false. sent3: that the bedrest occurs is right. sent4: the deeming occurs. sent5: if the passing happens the managership occurs. sent6: that the steeping Hanukkah does not occur but the immunoassay happens is not right. sent7: that both the keratinizing almanac and the steeping cholesterol happens is false. sent8: the spinalness occurs if that the trembles does not occur and the pictographicness happens is incorrect. sent9: the kicking does not occur. sent10: that both the spinalness and the non-Laotianness happens is not right. sent11: that both the immunoassay and the reeling happens is incorrect. sent12: the divorcing does not occur. sent13: that the matinee does not occur and the freezing igloo happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that not the trembles but the pictographicness occurs is false is not wrong.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the spinalness occurs.; sent1 & sent10 -> int2: the spinalness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it steeps planarian and is not an over it does not steep source is not wrong. | (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: the privateer does steep source if it steeps planarian and it is not a kind of an over. sent2: there is something such that if it does steep planarian and is not an over then it does steep source. sent3: if something is a kind of a lead that is not a kind of a heist then it does not freeze gander. sent4: the privateer is not a kind of a yore if the fact that it does steep planarian and is not a Fissipedia is true. sent5: the privateer does not steep source if it does steep planarian and is not an over. sent6: there exists something such that if it steeps self-government and does not bitt generosity then that it is not aluminous is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of contrapuntal thing that is not a kind of a oilcan then it does not relapse. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Durante and it is not a Monaco then it is not phocine. sent9: if the privateer is an over and it keratinizes interval it is not Monacan. sent10: there exists something such that if it steeps planarian and is an over it does not steep source. sent11: if the privateer steeps planarian and is a kind of an over then it does not steep source. sent12: there exists something such that if it bitts hybridization and it does not freeze gander it is not filar. sent13: the privateer is not an over if it is an inflation and it is not contrapuntal. sent14: if the shelter is wide but it does not bitt generosity then that it is not an over is right. sent15: if the privateer is phocine but it is not senior it does not steep planarian. sent16: there is something such that if it is a expansivity and is not a kind of a libertarian it is not a kind of a Steele. sent17: there is something such that if it is a swallowtail and is a heist it does not freeze Chippendale. sent18: if the privateer is apiarian thing that does not bitt generosity then it does not freeze work-shirt. sent19: if the privateer freezes Tenoretic but it does not steep planarian it is a beads. sent20: something does not bitt hybridization if it is both a kilovolt and not pilosebaceous. sent21: if the Byzantine is both a radiocarbon and not epigastric then it does not steep planarian. | sent1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: (x): ({AS}x & ¬{II}x) -> ¬{BK}x sent4: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{IR}{aa}) -> ¬{CH}{aa} sent5: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({HK}x & ¬{GA}x) -> ¬{FO}x sent7: (Ex): ({AP}x & ¬{IC}x) -> ¬{CJ}x sent8: (Ex): ({DB}x & ¬{Q}x) -> ¬{HD}x sent9: ({AB}{aa} & {IL}{aa}) -> ¬{AI}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent12: (Ex): ({HU}x & ¬{BK}x) -> ¬{FC}x sent13: ({DQ}{aa} & ¬{AP}{aa}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent14: ({FH}{bk} & ¬{GA}{bk}) -> ¬{AB}{bk} sent15: ({HD}{aa} & ¬{BJ}{aa}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent16: (Ex): ({FJ}x & ¬{IO}x) -> ¬{L}x sent17: (Ex): ({DK}x & {II}x) -> ¬{FF}x sent18: ({BA}{aa} & ¬{GA}{aa}) -> ¬{HR}{aa} sent19: ({G}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) -> {FN}{aa} sent20: (x): ({DR}x & ¬{GM}x) -> ¬{HU}x sent21: ({HQ}{f} & ¬{GS}{f}) -> ¬{AA}{f} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the privateer does not bitt hybridization if it is both a kilovolt and not pilosebaceous. | ({DR}{aa} & ¬{GM}{aa}) -> ¬{HU}{aa} | [
"sent20 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it steeps planarian and is not an over it does not steep source is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the privateer does steep source if it steeps planarian and it is not a kind of an over. sent2: there is something such that if it does steep planarian and is not an over then it does steep source. sent3: if something is a kind of a lead that is not a kind of a heist then it does not freeze gander. sent4: the privateer is not a kind of a yore if the fact that it does steep planarian and is not a Fissipedia is true. sent5: the privateer does not steep source if it does steep planarian and is not an over. sent6: there exists something such that if it steeps self-government and does not bitt generosity then that it is not aluminous is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of contrapuntal thing that is not a kind of a oilcan then it does not relapse. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a Durante and it is not a Monaco then it is not phocine. sent9: if the privateer is an over and it keratinizes interval it is not Monacan. sent10: there exists something such that if it steeps planarian and is an over it does not steep source. sent11: if the privateer steeps planarian and is a kind of an over then it does not steep source. sent12: there exists something such that if it bitts hybridization and it does not freeze gander it is not filar. sent13: the privateer is not an over if it is an inflation and it is not contrapuntal. sent14: if the shelter is wide but it does not bitt generosity then that it is not an over is right. sent15: if the privateer is phocine but it is not senior it does not steep planarian. sent16: there is something such that if it is a expansivity and is not a kind of a libertarian it is not a kind of a Steele. sent17: there is something such that if it is a swallowtail and is a heist it does not freeze Chippendale. sent18: if the privateer is apiarian thing that does not bitt generosity then it does not freeze work-shirt. sent19: if the privateer freezes Tenoretic but it does not steep planarian it is a beads. sent20: something does not bitt hybridization if it is both a kilovolt and not pilosebaceous. sent21: if the Byzantine is both a radiocarbon and not epigastric then it does not steep planarian. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it steeps tercentennial and does steep requirement is incorrect. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of cystic thing that keratinizes laager is not correct. sent2: if something does not steep crucifer then that it is a kind of a Para and it keratinizes Malvastrum is not true. sent3: there exists nothing such that it does freeze swallowtail and it is dishonest. sent4: the fact that the forepaw steeps tercentennial and is a kind of a pyromaniac does not hold. sent5: if something researches then the fact that it does not steep GCSE and is not a kind of a Moon is false. sent6: there exists nothing that steeps Terence and freezes Nero. sent7: if the fact that something does not steep GCSE and it is not a kind of a Moon does not hold it does not steep crucifer. sent8: the fruitcake is not a crew if it is both not archesporial and a Green. sent9: everything is non-archesporial and a Green. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-inferior and not moneyed is false. sent11: if the fruitcake does not crow then the disa is both a quattrocento and a research. sent12: there exists nothing that freezes tapotement and is a Keynesian. | sent1: (Ex): ¬({JC}x & {CC}x) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({EC}x & {EE}x) sent3: (x): ¬({HS}x & {IP}x) sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & {CK}{aa}) sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent6: (x): ¬({FI}x & {EI}x) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent8: (¬{H}{b} & {G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent9: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) sent10: (Ex): ¬({CM}x & {GI}x) sent11: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) sent12: (x): ¬({BU}x & {CN}x) | []
| []
| there exists something such that that it is a Para and keratinizes Malvastrum is incorrect. | (Ex): ¬({EC}x & {EE}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the disa is a Para and does keratinize Malvastrum does not hold if it does not steep crucifer.; sent7 -> int2: the disa does not steep crucifer if the fact that it does not steep GCSE and it is not a kind of a Moon does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: the fact that the disa does not steep GCSE and is not a kind of a Moon does not hold if it does research.; sent9 -> int4: the fruitcake is not archesporial but it is a Green.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the fruitcake does not crow.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the disa is a kind of a quattrocento and it does research.; int6 -> int7: the disa does research.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the disa does not steep GCSE and it is not a Moon is false.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the disa does not steep crucifer.; int1 & int9 -> int10: that the disa is a Para and it does keratinize Malvastrum is wrong.; int10 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 8 | 2 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that that it steeps tercentennial and does steep requirement is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of cystic thing that keratinizes laager is not correct. sent2: if something does not steep crucifer then that it is a kind of a Para and it keratinizes Malvastrum is not true. sent3: there exists nothing such that it does freeze swallowtail and it is dishonest. sent4: the fact that the forepaw steeps tercentennial and is a kind of a pyromaniac does not hold. sent5: if something researches then the fact that it does not steep GCSE and is not a kind of a Moon is false. sent6: there exists nothing that steeps Terence and freezes Nero. sent7: if the fact that something does not steep GCSE and it is not a kind of a Moon does not hold it does not steep crucifer. sent8: the fruitcake is not a crew if it is both not archesporial and a Green. sent9: everything is non-archesporial and a Green. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is both not non-inferior and not moneyed is false. sent11: if the fruitcake does not crow then the disa is both a quattrocento and a research. sent12: there exists nothing that freezes tapotement and is a Keynesian. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it is both not Freudian and Thracian then it freezes polyelectrolyte is not incorrect. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: there exists something such that if it is Freudian thing that is a kind of a Thracian then it does freeze polyelectrolyte. sent2: if the Cuban is a kind of Freudian a Thracian it freezes polyelectrolyte. sent3: if the Cuban is not Malaysia but Freudian it does steep HCG. sent4: if the Cuban is not Freudian and is a Thracian it freezes polyelectrolyte. sent5: if something is not elfin and is anhydrous it pinks. sent6: the organza does bitt outwork if it is not a kind of a Freudian and it is a gradual. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a worse and it is a kind of a four-wheeler then it is ethical. | sent1: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent3: (¬{AP}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> {AL}{aa} sent4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (x): (¬{IL}x & {JF}x) -> {EK}x sent6: (¬{AA}{he} & {IC}{he}) -> {DD}{he} sent7: (Ex): (¬{DO}x & {BR}x) -> {BO}x | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there exists something such that if it is not elfin and it is anhydrous it is a pink. | (Ex): (¬{IL}x & {JF}x) -> {EK}x | [
"sent5 -> int1: the fact that the outwork pinks hold if it is a kind of non-elfin thing that is anhydrous.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is both not Freudian and Thracian then it freezes polyelectrolyte is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is Freudian thing that is a kind of a Thracian then it does freeze polyelectrolyte. sent2: if the Cuban is a kind of Freudian a Thracian it freezes polyelectrolyte. sent3: if the Cuban is not Malaysia but Freudian it does steep HCG. sent4: if the Cuban is not Freudian and is a Thracian it freezes polyelectrolyte. sent5: if something is not elfin and is anhydrous it pinks. sent6: the organza does bitt outwork if it is not a kind of a Freudian and it is a gradual. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a worse and it is a kind of a four-wheeler then it is ethical. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the slinger keratinizes windage. | {B}{a} | sent1: if something does not stooge the fact that it does freeze Capek and it is gaseous is incorrect. sent2: the slinger either is a kind of an alsatian or is autotomic or both if there exists something such that it is an alsatian. sent3: that the slinger is not autotomic and it is not a kind of an alsatian does not hold if it is not gaseous. sent4: the aquatic does not wet and is not a scrumpy. sent5: something is not gaseous if it freezes Capek. sent6: the slinger is not a UNICEF. sent7: the slinger does not keratinize windage and it is not autotomic if something is not an alsatian. sent8: the slinger is non-autotomic thing that is not a sparseness. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a upholsterer and it does perorate does not hold then the bastnasite does not stooge. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a upholsterer that perorates does not hold. sent11: the sulfisoxazole is not gaseous if there is something such that the fact that it freezes Capek and is not gaseous is not right. sent12: there exists something such that it does not keratinize windage. sent13: something is not an alsatian. sent14: something is an alsatian if it is not gaseous. | sent1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({E}x & {D}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ({A}{a} v {C}{a}) sent3: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent4: (¬{FT}{dp} & ¬{JI}{dp}) sent5: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x sent6: ¬{AJ}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{IN}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}{c} sent10: (Ex): ¬({H}x & {G}x) sent11: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}{b} sent12: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent14: (x): ¬{D}x -> {A}x | [
"sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the slinger does not keratinize windage and is not autotomic.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent13 & sent7 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the motel does not keratinize windage. | ¬{B}{fg} | [
"sent5 -> int2: if the slinger freezes Capek the fact that it is not gaseous is not incorrect.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the slinger keratinizes windage. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not stooge the fact that it does freeze Capek and it is gaseous is incorrect. sent2: the slinger either is a kind of an alsatian or is autotomic or both if there exists something such that it is an alsatian. sent3: that the slinger is not autotomic and it is not a kind of an alsatian does not hold if it is not gaseous. sent4: the aquatic does not wet and is not a scrumpy. sent5: something is not gaseous if it freezes Capek. sent6: the slinger is not a UNICEF. sent7: the slinger does not keratinize windage and it is not autotomic if something is not an alsatian. sent8: the slinger is non-autotomic thing that is not a sparseness. sent9: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a upholsterer and it does perorate does not hold then the bastnasite does not stooge. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is a upholsterer that perorates does not hold. sent11: the sulfisoxazole is not gaseous if there is something such that the fact that it freezes Capek and is not gaseous is not right. sent12: there exists something such that it does not keratinize windage. sent13: something is not an alsatian. sent14: something is an alsatian if it is not gaseous. ; $proof$ = | sent13 & sent7 -> int1: the slinger does not keratinize windage and is not autotomic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is a trudger the fact that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or does not crown is not right. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) | sent1: if the corvette is omissive the fact that it either is not a shellfish or is not a kind of a bullheaded or both is not true. sent2: if something is dissuasive that either it is not a kind of a Melanchthon or it is not colorectal or both does not hold. sent3: if the corvette is a trudger it does keratinize birdnesting. sent4: there exists something such that if it plumes then that it is not cytoplasmic and/or it is not uncivil does not hold. sent5: if the corvette is a trudger that either it does not keratinize birdnesting or it is not a crown or both does not hold. sent6: the fact that if the corvette is a kind of the trudger the fact that the corvette does not keratinize birdnesting or it is a kind of a crown or both is wrong is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a trudger then it keratinizes birdnesting. sent8: there exists something such that if it is percussive then the fact that it is messianic and/or is not a transitive is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a roundtable then the fact that it is not woolen and/or is not clamatorial is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that if it is a trudger that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or it is a crown is not right. sent11: if the sannyasi is a natterjack the fact that it is not a trudger and/or it does not keratinize beguilement is not right. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a trudger is correct then the fact that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or it is not a crown is true. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a trudger it crowns. sent14: if the corvette is a kind of a trudger then either it does not keratinize birdnesting or it is not a crown or both. | sent1: {GR}{aa} -> ¬(¬{DL}{aa} v ¬{BS}{aa}) sent2: (x): {IA}x -> ¬(¬{IB}x v ¬{CL}x) sent3: {A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent4: (Ex): {GC}x -> ¬(¬{FA}x v ¬{BA}x) sent5: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent7: (Ex): {A}x -> {AA}x sent8: (Ex): {AP}x -> ¬({GF}x v ¬{BQ}x) sent9: (Ex): {GK}x -> ¬(¬{DJ}x v ¬{FP}x) sent10: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent11: {HM}{cc} -> ¬(¬{A}{cc} v ¬{HN}{cc}) sent12: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent13: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x sent14: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if that it is dissuasive is true then the fact that either it is not a Melanchthon or it is not colorectal or both is wrong. | (Ex): {IA}x -> ¬(¬{IB}x v ¬{CL}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the vignette is not a Melanchthon and/or it is not colorectal is wrong if it is dissuasive.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a trudger the fact that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or does not crown is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the corvette is omissive the fact that it either is not a shellfish or is not a kind of a bullheaded or both is not true. sent2: if something is dissuasive that either it is not a kind of a Melanchthon or it is not colorectal or both does not hold. sent3: if the corvette is a trudger it does keratinize birdnesting. sent4: there exists something such that if it plumes then that it is not cytoplasmic and/or it is not uncivil does not hold. sent5: if the corvette is a trudger that either it does not keratinize birdnesting or it is not a crown or both does not hold. sent6: the fact that if the corvette is a kind of the trudger the fact that the corvette does not keratinize birdnesting or it is a kind of a crown or both is wrong is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a trudger then it keratinizes birdnesting. sent8: there exists something such that if it is percussive then the fact that it is messianic and/or is not a transitive is false. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a roundtable then the fact that it is not woolen and/or is not clamatorial is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that if it is a trudger that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or it is a crown is not right. sent11: if the sannyasi is a natterjack the fact that it is not a trudger and/or it does not keratinize beguilement is not right. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a trudger is correct then the fact that it does not keratinize birdnesting and/or it is not a crown is true. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a trudger it crowns. sent14: if the corvette is a kind of a trudger then either it does not keratinize birdnesting or it is not a crown or both. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the maestro is both not an honor and senior is incorrect. | ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: if something keratinizes planarian then it does not keratinize maestro. sent2: the maestro is not a kind of a Hungarian and does not steep eightsome. sent3: the fact that the maestro is both an honor and a senior is not correct if the masthead is not contestable. sent4: the lactogen is senior. sent5: the masthead is Tasmanian. sent6: the masthead is a TKO and it does keratinize planarian. sent7: if the maestro does keratinize planarian it is not a kind of an honor and it is not a TKO. sent8: the fact that the maestro is both not an honor and senior is not true if the masthead is not contestable. sent9: the fact that the masthead is not a spill is not false. sent10: if the maestro is not a TKO that the masthead is not senior and is an honor does not hold. sent11: if the masthead keratinizes planarian it does not keratinize maestro. sent12: the masthead is a biomedicine. sent13: the fact that the maestro is an honor and senior is not correct. sent14: the masthead does not keratinize maestro. sent15: the masthead is not senior. sent16: the maestro is not a TKO. sent17: something does not keratinize planarian but it is a TKO if the fact that it is a dermatologist is true. sent18: the masthead is a sequin. | sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent2: (¬{EB}{a} & ¬{BH}{a}) sent3: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent4: {B}{fq} sent5: {DM}{aa} sent6: ({D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent7: {A}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent8: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent9: ¬{DA}{aa} sent10: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent11: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent12: {EU}{aa} sent13: ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: ¬{AA}{aa} sent15: ¬{B}{aa} sent16: ¬{D}{a} sent17: (x): {E}x -> (¬{A}x & {D}x) sent18: {JA}{aa} | [
"sent6 -> int1: that the masthead does keratinize planarian is true.;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{aa};"
]
| the maestro is not an honor and is senior. | (¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent17 -> int2: if that the medication is a dermatologist is not wrong then it does not keratinize planarian and is a TKO.;"
]
| 7 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the maestro is both not an honor and senior is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something keratinizes planarian then it does not keratinize maestro. sent2: the maestro is not a kind of a Hungarian and does not steep eightsome. sent3: the fact that the maestro is both an honor and a senior is not correct if the masthead is not contestable. sent4: the lactogen is senior. sent5: the masthead is Tasmanian. sent6: the masthead is a TKO and it does keratinize planarian. sent7: if the maestro does keratinize planarian it is not a kind of an honor and it is not a TKO. sent8: the fact that the maestro is both not an honor and senior is not true if the masthead is not contestable. sent9: the fact that the masthead is not a spill is not false. sent10: if the maestro is not a TKO that the masthead is not senior and is an honor does not hold. sent11: if the masthead keratinizes planarian it does not keratinize maestro. sent12: the masthead is a biomedicine. sent13: the fact that the maestro is an honor and senior is not correct. sent14: the masthead does not keratinize maestro. sent15: the masthead is not senior. sent16: the maestro is not a TKO. sent17: something does not keratinize planarian but it is a TKO if the fact that it is a dermatologist is true. sent18: the masthead is a sequin. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: that the masthead does keratinize planarian is true.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the loir is a cosmology. | {C}{a} | sent1: if a non-manual thing is a kind of a Sphinx it is not nonretractile. sent2: if the loir is nonretractile that it is a cosmology is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it is a pterosaur. sent4: something that is not a Sphinx is a kind of a pterosaur that is nonretractile. sent5: the loir is nonretractile if something is a pterosaur. sent6: if something is a pterosaur then it is a kind of a cosmology. | sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent3: (Ex): {A}x sent4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent6: (x): {A}x -> {C}x | [
"sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the loir is nonretractile.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the singer is a cosmology hold. | {C}{gq} | [
"sent6 -> int2: the fact that the singer is a cosmology is not incorrect if it is a pterosaur.; sent4 -> int3: if the singer is not a Sphinx then it is a pterosaur that is nonretractile.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the loir is a cosmology. ; $context$ = sent1: if a non-manual thing is a kind of a Sphinx it is not nonretractile. sent2: if the loir is nonretractile that it is a cosmology is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it is a pterosaur. sent4: something that is not a Sphinx is a kind of a pterosaur that is nonretractile. sent5: the loir is nonretractile if something is a pterosaur. sent6: if something is a pterosaur then it is a kind of a cosmology. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent5 -> int1: the loir is nonretractile.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the studding does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: the freezing luxuriation does not occur. sent2: if the tastelessness does not occur the interchange does not occur. sent3: the studding occurs if the freezing luxuriation occurs. sent4: the fact that the freezing scrappiness does not occur and the amount happens is false if the fact that the freezing luxuriation occurs is not false. sent5: if the volley does not occur then the alkaloidalness and/or the soberingness occurs. sent6: if the emcee does not occur then the fact that the freezing luxuriation does not occur but the studding happens is not right. sent7: that the tastelessness but not the bitchery happens does not hold if the mishap occurs. sent8: the tastelessness does not occur if that the tastelessness but not the bitchery occurs is wrong. sent9: if the fact that the interchanging does not occur is right the soberingness occurs and the volley occurs. sent10: if the bitting collagenase does not occur that the studding does not occur or the emceeing happens or both is not true. sent11: the emceeing occurs and the freezing luxuriation happens if that the bitting collagenase does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the alkaloidalness but not the bitting collagenase occurs if the soberingness occurs. | sent1: ¬{A} sent2: ¬{I} -> ¬{H} sent3: {A} -> {B} sent4: {A} -> ¬(¬{HI} & {BD}) sent5: ¬{G} -> ({E} v {F}) sent6: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) sent7: {J} -> ¬({I} & ¬{K}) sent8: ¬({I} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} sent9: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent10: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} v {C}) sent11: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {A}) sent12: {F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stud happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the freezing luxuriation does not occur but the studding occurs.;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {B}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{A} & {B});"
]
| the fact that the studding occurs is not wrong. | {B} | []
| 12 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the studding does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the freezing luxuriation does not occur. sent2: if the tastelessness does not occur the interchange does not occur. sent3: the studding occurs if the freezing luxuriation occurs. sent4: the fact that the freezing scrappiness does not occur and the amount happens is false if the fact that the freezing luxuriation occurs is not false. sent5: if the volley does not occur then the alkaloidalness and/or the soberingness occurs. sent6: if the emcee does not occur then the fact that the freezing luxuriation does not occur but the studding happens is not right. sent7: that the tastelessness but not the bitchery happens does not hold if the mishap occurs. sent8: the tastelessness does not occur if that the tastelessness but not the bitchery occurs is wrong. sent9: if the fact that the interchanging does not occur is right the soberingness occurs and the volley occurs. sent10: if the bitting collagenase does not occur that the studding does not occur or the emceeing happens or both is not true. sent11: the emceeing occurs and the freezing luxuriation happens if that the bitting collagenase does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the alkaloidalness but not the bitting collagenase occurs if the soberingness occurs. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stud happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the freezing luxuriation does not occur but the studding occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if that it is a kind of a EST and it is a sachem is not true it does not hunt. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: if that something is a EST that is a kind of a sachem does not hold it is not a kind of a hunt. sent2: something does not steep Maupassant if that it does bitt beaming and steeps Cebus is not right. | sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): ¬({U}x & {FQ}x) -> ¬{CT}x | [
"sent1 -> int1: the melanocyte is not a hunt if the fact that it is a EST and it is a kind of a sachem is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if the fact that it bitts beaming and steeps Cebus is not right then it does not steep Maupassant. | (Ex): ¬({U}x & {FQ}x) -> ¬{CT}x | [
"sent2 -> int2: the fact that the formaldehyde does not steep Maupassant hold if the fact that it does bitt beaming and it steeps Cebus does not hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a kind of a EST and it is a sachem is not true it does not hunt. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a EST that is a kind of a sachem does not hold it is not a kind of a hunt. sent2: something does not steep Maupassant if that it does bitt beaming and steeps Cebus is not right. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the melanocyte is not a hunt if the fact that it is a EST and it is a kind of a sachem is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if that it is not a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer is not wrong it does moisten. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: that something steeps six-spot is not false if it does not come and it steeps grub. sent2: if the snook is a kind of non-subsequent thing that is time-release it does moisten. sent3: there is something such that if it is nonmagnetic and it is surface-to-air it is a haddock. sent4: the procarbazine moistens if it is not a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer. sent5: the procarbazine exploits if it is not a glow but a serologist. sent6: there is something such that if it does not whomp and bitts directorate then it bitts Liepaja. sent7: if the procarbazine does not steep venesection but it is a kind of a Salvador it steeps Unitarian. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not keratinize Schefflera and it is bacteroidal it is an annelid. sent9: the procarbazine does tell if it is not autoecious and it bitts Irelander. sent10: there is something such that if it keratinizes method and does warm it is a grub. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not steep snook and it does steep log that it is a Tibetan hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a churn and is a trespass then that it keratinizes enrichment is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it ligates and does tell then it does freeze fringe. sent14: if that the procarbazine does not moisten but it is contractual is correct that it does keratinize Loki is right. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Vogul and keratinizes enrichment it is a stave hold. sent16: if the procarbazine is a kind of a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer then it does moisten. sent17: there is something such that if it does not spin and it does bitt Liepaja then it steeps hospitableness. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does not bitt directorate and does tell is not wrong then it is bacteroidal. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not keratinize gummite and it is a obstruent then it is bardic. | sent1: (x): (¬{FF}x & {HO}x) -> {BI}x sent2: (¬{GH}{ag} & {S}{ag}) -> {B}{ag} sent3: (Ex): ({DU}x & {CP}x) -> {FM}x sent4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (¬{FI}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> {JA}{aa} sent6: (Ex): (¬{BU}x & {BK}x) -> {GI}x sent7: (¬{HT}{aa} & {HD}{aa}) -> {EG}{aa} sent8: (Ex): (¬{DI}x & {JK}x) -> {CB}x sent9: (¬{GN}{aa} & {AL}{aa}) -> {EM}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({G}x & {GM}x) -> {AO}x sent11: (Ex): (¬{GO}x & {JH}x) -> {DB}x sent12: (Ex): (¬{ET}x & {FD}x) -> {FH}x sent13: (Ex): ({HB}x & {EM}x) -> {CQ}x sent14: (¬{B}{aa} & {GB}{aa}) -> {AU}{aa} sent15: (Ex): (¬{BQ}x & {FH}x) -> {AI}x sent16: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent17: (Ex): (¬{HF}x & {GI}x) -> {BN}x sent18: (Ex): (¬{BK}x & {EM}x) -> {JK}x sent19: (Ex): (¬{HN}x & {DQ}x) -> {IQ}x | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it does not come and steeps grub it steeps six-spot. | (Ex): (¬{FF}x & {HO}x) -> {BI}x | [
"sent1 -> int1: the six-spot does steep six-spot if it does not come and it steeps grub.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer is not wrong it does moisten. ; $context$ = sent1: that something steeps six-spot is not false if it does not come and it steeps grub. sent2: if the snook is a kind of non-subsequent thing that is time-release it does moisten. sent3: there is something such that if it is nonmagnetic and it is surface-to-air it is a haddock. sent4: the procarbazine moistens if it is not a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer. sent5: the procarbazine exploits if it is not a glow but a serologist. sent6: there is something such that if it does not whomp and bitts directorate then it bitts Liepaja. sent7: if the procarbazine does not steep venesection but it is a kind of a Salvador it steeps Unitarian. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not keratinize Schefflera and it is bacteroidal it is an annelid. sent9: the procarbazine does tell if it is not autoecious and it bitts Irelander. sent10: there is something such that if it keratinizes method and does warm it is a grub. sent11: there exists something such that if it does not steep snook and it does steep log that it is a Tibetan hold. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a churn and is a trespass then that it keratinizes enrichment is not wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it ligates and does tell then it does freeze fringe. sent14: if that the procarbazine does not moisten but it is contractual is correct that it does keratinize Loki is right. sent15: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Vogul and keratinizes enrichment it is a stave hold. sent16: if the procarbazine is a kind of a serologist and it does freeze out-and-outer then it does moisten. sent17: there is something such that if it does not spin and it does bitt Liepaja then it steeps hospitableness. sent18: there is something such that if the fact that it does not bitt directorate and does tell is not wrong then it is bacteroidal. sent19: there exists something such that if it does not keratinize gummite and it is a obstruent then it is bardic. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the stalking-horse does steep grinder. | {A}{a} | sent1: the stalking-horse is a salmonid. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a Maja and it keratinizes Megaera is not right then the stalking-horse is a mews. sent3: the pathogen steeps grinder if there exists something such that that it bitts tapotement and crams is not true. sent4: the domino does steep grinder. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is both a mews and a salmonid is not right. sent6: the stalking-horse does steep grinder if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a mews and is a salmonid is not right. | sent1: {AB}{a} sent2: (x): ¬({BI}x & {HQ}x) -> {AA}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({BJ}x & {HP}x) -> {A}{dk} sent4: {A}{cr} sent5: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the stalking-horse does steep grinder. ; $context$ = sent1: the stalking-horse is a salmonid. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a Maja and it keratinizes Megaera is not right then the stalking-horse is a mews. sent3: the pathogen steeps grinder if there exists something such that that it bitts tapotement and crams is not true. sent4: the domino does steep grinder. sent5: there is something such that the fact that it is both a mews and a salmonid is not right. sent6: the stalking-horse does steep grinder if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a mews and is a salmonid is not right. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the hairbrush is a burglary is true. | {C}{b} | sent1: something is a DOS. sent2: the hairbrush is a stance if there is something such that it is a burglary. sent3: if the hairbrush is a kind of a burglary then the absorber does overbalance. sent4: the hairbrush is a stance if the absorber is a burglary. sent5: the absorber is a stance if something is a DOS. sent6: the fact that the absorber is a burglary is correct if there exists something such that it is a stance. sent7: the fullerene bitts pony. sent8: the absorber is a kind of a stance if there is something such that it is a kind of a burglary. sent9: the hairbrush is a burglary if the absorber is a stance. sent10: that the hairbrush keratinizes voyeurism hold. sent11: if the hairbrush is a stance then the absorber is a burglary. | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: (x): {C}x -> {B}{b} sent3: {C}{b} -> {CE}{a} sent4: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent6: (x): {B}x -> {C}{a} sent7: {IP}{gs} sent8: (x): {C}x -> {B}{a} sent9: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent10: {FU}{b} sent11: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} | [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the absorber is a stance.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the hairbrush is a burglary is true. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a DOS. sent2: the hairbrush is a stance if there is something such that it is a burglary. sent3: if the hairbrush is a kind of a burglary then the absorber does overbalance. sent4: the hairbrush is a stance if the absorber is a burglary. sent5: the absorber is a stance if something is a DOS. sent6: the fact that the absorber is a burglary is correct if there exists something such that it is a stance. sent7: the fullerene bitts pony. sent8: the absorber is a kind of a stance if there is something such that it is a kind of a burglary. sent9: the hairbrush is a burglary if the absorber is a stance. sent10: that the hairbrush keratinizes voyeurism hold. sent11: if the hairbrush is a stance then the absorber is a burglary. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the absorber is a stance.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the commune keratinizes acromion. | {B}{aa} | sent1: the commune is shrinkable. sent2: the commune is not unshrinkable if it is less. sent3: if that the acromion keratinizes acromion and it is less is not right the commune does not keratinizes acromion. sent4: there is something such that that it is a restfulness and it does not direct is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a restfulness and it is not directing. sent6: something is non-unshrinkable thing that is not a squat if it is less. sent7: if something is non-unshrinkable thing that is not a squat it does keratinize acromion. | sent1: ¬{AA}{aa} sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent3: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) sent5: (Ex): ({D}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent7: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent6 -> int1: if the commune is less then it is a kind of shrinkable thing that is not a kind of a squat.; sent7 -> int2: if the commune is shrinkable thing that does not squat then it keratinizes acromion.;"
]
| [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent7 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
]
| the commune does not keratinize acromion. | ¬{B}{aa} | []
| 5 | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the commune keratinizes acromion. ; $context$ = sent1: the commune is shrinkable. sent2: the commune is not unshrinkable if it is less. sent3: if that the acromion keratinizes acromion and it is less is not right the commune does not keratinizes acromion. sent4: there is something such that that it is a restfulness and it does not direct is not right. sent5: there exists something such that it is a kind of a restfulness and it is not directing. sent6: something is non-unshrinkable thing that is not a squat if it is less. sent7: if something is non-unshrinkable thing that is not a squat it does keratinize acromion. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: if the commune is less then it is a kind of shrinkable thing that is not a kind of a squat.; sent7 -> int2: if the commune is shrinkable thing that does not squat then it keratinizes acromion.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the Chicano is a Maalox is right. | {E}{a} | sent1: if something does not acculturate the fact that the recruiter does not bitt Brahmi but it does acculturate is incorrect. sent2: if something does steep Nubian it is future. sent3: something does bitt fireplug if it does aspirate. sent4: something is non-bignoniaceous if it is not a heroics. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Senora that the Chicano is non-bignoniaceous thing that is a damn is not correct. sent6: something does steep Nubian if it does bitt Brahmi. sent7: the fact that if the recruiter either is heroics or is future or both then the tachylite is not a kind of a heroics is true. sent8: the fact that the lorry is a kind of a damn that is a kind of a Senora is not true if the tachylite is not bignoniaceous. sent9: the fireplug is a kind of a Senora. sent10: that that the Chicano is bignoniaceous and it is a kind of a damn is right does not hold. sent11: if that something does not bitt Brahmi and acculturates does not hold then it bitt Brahmi. sent12: there exists something such that it does not acculturate. sent13: something is a kind of a Maalox if it is a heroics. sent14: if the Chicano is bignoniaceous then it is a kind of a heroics. sent15: if the fact that something is not a kind of a mouthbreeder but it does engender does not hold it does steep intaglio. | sent1: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{H}{d} & {I}{d}) sent2: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent3: (x): {HK}x -> {EK}x sent4: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent6: (x): {H}x -> {G}x sent7: ({D}{d} v {F}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent8: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent9: {A}{aa} sent10: ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> {H}x sent12: (Ex): ¬{I}x sent13: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent14: {C}{a} -> {D}{a} sent15: (x): ¬(¬{AG}x & {L}x) -> {CM}x | [
"sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Senora hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the Chicano is non-bignoniaceous thing that is a damn does not hold.; sent13 -> int3: the Chicano is a kind of a Maalox if it is not non-heroics.;"
]
| [
"sent9 -> int1: (Ex): {A}x; int1 & sent5 -> int2: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}); sent13 -> int3: {D}{a} -> {E}{a};"
]
| the Chicano is not a Maalox. | ¬{E}{a} | [
"sent4 -> int4: if the tachylite is not a kind of a heroics then it is not bignoniaceous.; sent2 -> int5: if the recruiter does steep Nubian it is future.; sent6 -> int6: if the recruiter bitts Brahmi it steeps Nubian.; sent11 -> int7: if the fact that the recruiter does not bitt Brahmi but it does acculturate does not hold it does bitt Brahmi.; sent12 & sent1 -> int8: that the recruiter does not bitt Brahmi and acculturates is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the recruiter does bitt Brahmi.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the recruiter does steep Nubian is correct.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the recruiter is future.; int11 -> int12: the recruiter is a heroics and/or it is a kind of a future.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the tachylite is not heroics.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the tachylite is not bignoniaceous.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the lorry is a kind of a damn that is a Senora is not correct.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a damn and it is a Senora is not correct.;"
]
| 10 | 4 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the Chicano is a Maalox is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not acculturate the fact that the recruiter does not bitt Brahmi but it does acculturate is incorrect. sent2: if something does steep Nubian it is future. sent3: something does bitt fireplug if it does aspirate. sent4: something is non-bignoniaceous if it is not a heroics. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Senora that the Chicano is non-bignoniaceous thing that is a damn is not correct. sent6: something does steep Nubian if it does bitt Brahmi. sent7: the fact that if the recruiter either is heroics or is future or both then the tachylite is not a kind of a heroics is true. sent8: the fact that the lorry is a kind of a damn that is a kind of a Senora is not true if the tachylite is not bignoniaceous. sent9: the fireplug is a kind of a Senora. sent10: that that the Chicano is bignoniaceous and it is a kind of a damn is right does not hold. sent11: if that something does not bitt Brahmi and acculturates does not hold then it bitt Brahmi. sent12: there exists something such that it does not acculturate. sent13: something is a kind of a Maalox if it is a heroics. sent14: if the Chicano is bignoniaceous then it is a kind of a heroics. sent15: if the fact that something is not a kind of a mouthbreeder but it does engender does not hold it does steep intaglio. ; $proof$ = | sent9 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Senora hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the Chicano is non-bignoniaceous thing that is a damn does not hold.; sent13 -> int3: the Chicano is a kind of a Maalox if it is not non-heroics.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the lunger does not steep posed. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: if the fact that something does not steep advance and is ictal is wrong it does not steep posed. sent2: if the lunger does steep advance then it does not steep posed. sent3: if the pompon does not keratinize rollerblader the fact that the slump does not keratinize entablature and does freeze headliner is wrong. sent4: the flannelbush is not viscometric if that it is viscometric and it is a nonpartisan is false. sent5: if something steeps advance it does not steep posed. sent6: that the lunger does not steep advance and is ictal is incorrect. sent7: that the flannelbush is not non-viscometric and it is a nonpartisan is not true. | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: {AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{HU}{bh} & {GU}{bh}) sent4: ¬({E}{d} & {G}{d}) -> ¬{E}{d} sent5: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent7: ¬({E}{d} & {G}{d}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the lunger does not steep posed if that it does not steep advance and is ictal does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the fact that the slump does not keratinize entablature and does freeze headliner is not correct is true. | ¬(¬{HU}{bh} & {GU}{bh}) | [
"sent4 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the flannelbush is viscometric hold is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is not viscometric.;"
]
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the lunger does not steep posed. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not steep advance and is ictal is wrong it does not steep posed. sent2: if the lunger does steep advance then it does not steep posed. sent3: if the pompon does not keratinize rollerblader the fact that the slump does not keratinize entablature and does freeze headliner is wrong. sent4: the flannelbush is not viscometric if that it is viscometric and it is a nonpartisan is false. sent5: if something steeps advance it does not steep posed. sent6: that the lunger does not steep advance and is ictal is incorrect. sent7: that the flannelbush is not non-viscometric and it is a nonpartisan is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the lunger does not steep posed if that it does not steep advance and is ictal does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the buckle is maximal is not wrong. | {A}{b} | sent1: if something is not Falstaffian it is configurational and it does supplicate. sent2: the buckle does not freeze bureaucracy. sent3: if something is a micrometer the fact that it is not tearful and not a seismologist does not hold. sent4: the capital is not Falstaffian. sent5: the buckle is maximal thing that does not freeze bureaucracy if the nip is not maximal. sent6: something that does steep scrimshanker is non-maximal thing that does freeze bureaucracy. sent7: if the nip steeps scrimshanker that the buckle steeps scrimshanker hold. sent8: the ormer is a micrometer if there exists something such that it is configurational thing that does supplicate. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is rotational and is not relevant is not correct. sent10: the fact that if that the self-portrait is a yawl is right the nip does steep scrimshanker or it is not uncivil or both is not wrong. sent11: the self-portrait is a yawl if there is something such that the fact that it is not tearful and it is not a seismologist is false. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is rotational and it is not relevant is not true the nip is not maximal. | sent1: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({I}x & {J}x) sent2: ¬{B}{b} sent3: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) sent4: ¬{K}{e} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent6: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent7: {C}{a} -> {C}{b} sent8: (x): ({I}x & {J}x) -> {H}{d} sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: {E}{c} -> ({C}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> {E}{c} sent12: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the nip is not maximal.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the buckle is a kind of maximal thing that does not freeze bureaucracy.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent12 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent5 & int1 -> int2: ({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the buckle is not maximal. | ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the buckle steeps scrimshanker it is not maximal and freezes bureaucracy.; sent3 -> int4: if the ormer is a kind of a micrometer then the fact that it is not tearful and it is not a kind of a seismologist is not true.; sent1 -> int5: if the capital is not Falstaffian then it is configurational and it supplicates.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the capital is configurational and it does supplicate is not wrong.; int6 -> int7: something is configurational and does supplicate.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the ormer is a micrometer.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the ormer is a kind of non-tearful thing that is not a kind of a seismologist is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-tearful thing that is not a seismologist is wrong.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the self-portrait is a yawl.; sent10 & int11 -> int12: either the nip does steep scrimshanker or it is not uncivil or both.;"
]
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the buckle is maximal is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not Falstaffian it is configurational and it does supplicate. sent2: the buckle does not freeze bureaucracy. sent3: if something is a micrometer the fact that it is not tearful and not a seismologist does not hold. sent4: the capital is not Falstaffian. sent5: the buckle is maximal thing that does not freeze bureaucracy if the nip is not maximal. sent6: something that does steep scrimshanker is non-maximal thing that does freeze bureaucracy. sent7: if the nip steeps scrimshanker that the buckle steeps scrimshanker hold. sent8: the ormer is a micrometer if there exists something such that it is configurational thing that does supplicate. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is rotational and is not relevant is not correct. sent10: the fact that if that the self-portrait is a yawl is right the nip does steep scrimshanker or it is not uncivil or both is not wrong. sent11: the self-portrait is a yawl if there is something such that the fact that it is not tearful and it is not a seismologist is false. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is rotational and it is not relevant is not true the nip is not maximal. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent12 -> int1: the nip is not maximal.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the buckle is a kind of maximal thing that does not freeze bureaucracy.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | either the culdoscopy happens or the moment does not occur or both. | ({E} v ¬{D}) | sent1: that both the polyphonicness and the airs occurs hold. sent2: that the keratinizing bondholder does not occur triggers that the airs occurs and/or the polyphonicness does not occur. sent3: the heavy-dutiness does not occur. sent4: that the moment does not occur is brought about by that the keratinizing bondholder and the polyphonicness occurs. sent5: if not the extragalacticness but the alvineness happens the bitting put-put does not occur. sent6: if the polyphonicness does not occur the fact that the culdoscopy occurs and/or the moment does not occur is wrong. sent7: if the bitting put-put does not occur either the freezing decalcification or the pop-up or both happens. sent8: the lowering occurs and the honeying happens. sent9: either the Antiguanness happens or the parallax happens or both. sent10: the culdoscopy occurs and/or the moment occurs. sent11: the fact that that the IRA occurs but the keratinizing bondholder does not occur is not wrong does not hold. sent12: if the scan happens and the abundantness occurs then that the cyclopeanness happens is not correct. sent13: that the keratinizing bondholder does not occur is triggered by that the IRA happens. sent14: that the Cromwellianness happens and the young happens prevents that the keratinizing disincentive happens. sent15: the microscopy does not occur if both the afloatness and the misdemeanor happens. sent16: the misdemeanor occurs. sent17: the airing happens. sent18: both the pop-up and the Antiguan happens. sent19: that the spiritlessness occurs hold. sent20: the impreciseness and/or the undulation happens. sent21: the steeping unhealthiness occurs. sent22: the fact that both the IRA and the keratinizing bondholder happens is wrong. | sent1: ({A} & {B}) sent2: ¬{C} -> ({B} v ¬{A}) sent3: ¬{CP} sent4: ({C} & {A}) -> ¬{D} sent5: (¬{K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬({E} v ¬{D}) sent7: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) sent8: ({BS} & {HD}) sent9: ({FR} v {AM}) sent10: ({E} v {D}) sent11: ¬({F} & ¬{C}) sent12: ({FF} & {HH}) -> ¬{M} sent13: {F} -> ¬{C} sent14: ({DP} & {CC}) -> ¬{HL} sent15: ({BE} & {EO}) -> ¬{AI} sent16: {EO} sent17: {B} sent18: ({G} & {FR}) sent19: {ER} sent20: ({AB} v {IS}) sent21: {ES} sent22: ¬({F} & {C}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: the polyphonicness occurs.;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: {A};"
]
| that that either the culdoscopy happens or the moment does not occur or both is right is incorrect. | ¬({E} v ¬{D}) | []
| 9 | 4 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = either the culdoscopy happens or the moment does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the polyphonicness and the airs occurs hold. sent2: that the keratinizing bondholder does not occur triggers that the airs occurs and/or the polyphonicness does not occur. sent3: the heavy-dutiness does not occur. sent4: that the moment does not occur is brought about by that the keratinizing bondholder and the polyphonicness occurs. sent5: if not the extragalacticness but the alvineness happens the bitting put-put does not occur. sent6: if the polyphonicness does not occur the fact that the culdoscopy occurs and/or the moment does not occur is wrong. sent7: if the bitting put-put does not occur either the freezing decalcification or the pop-up or both happens. sent8: the lowering occurs and the honeying happens. sent9: either the Antiguanness happens or the parallax happens or both. sent10: the culdoscopy occurs and/or the moment occurs. sent11: the fact that that the IRA occurs but the keratinizing bondholder does not occur is not wrong does not hold. sent12: if the scan happens and the abundantness occurs then that the cyclopeanness happens is not correct. sent13: that the keratinizing bondholder does not occur is triggered by that the IRA happens. sent14: that the Cromwellianness happens and the young happens prevents that the keratinizing disincentive happens. sent15: the microscopy does not occur if both the afloatness and the misdemeanor happens. sent16: the misdemeanor occurs. sent17: the airing happens. sent18: both the pop-up and the Antiguan happens. sent19: that the spiritlessness occurs hold. sent20: the impreciseness and/or the undulation happens. sent21: the steeping unhealthiness occurs. sent22: the fact that both the IRA and the keratinizing bondholder happens is wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: the polyphonicness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the abdication happens is right. | {A} | sent1: if the attributiveness does not occur then both the freezing winery and the bitting raid happens. sent2: not the bitting raid but the freezing winery happens if the attributiveness occurs. sent3: the steeping Wolffiella does not occur. sent4: if the bitting raid does not occur the abdication happens and the freezing TKO occurs. sent5: that the freezing reenactment does not occur is true. sent6: the freezing TKO does not occur if the abdication occurs. sent7: the unwariness does not occur. sent8: the keratinizing interestedness occurs. sent9: the fact that the axonalness does not occur is true. sent10: if the bitting raid happens then that the freezing TKO does not occur and the abdication does not occur does not hold. sent11: the conceptualization happens if the fact that the freezing TKO does not occur and the abdication does not occur is not correct. sent12: the freezing TKO happens. | sent1: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C}) sent2: {E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) sent3: ¬{DF} sent4: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent5: ¬{IB} sent6: {A} -> ¬{B} sent7: ¬{K} sent8: {S} sent9: ¬{BI} sent10: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent11: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {JG} sent12: {B} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abdication happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the freezing TKO does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent12 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the conceptualization occurs. | {JG} | []
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the abdication happens is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the attributiveness does not occur then both the freezing winery and the bitting raid happens. sent2: not the bitting raid but the freezing winery happens if the attributiveness occurs. sent3: the steeping Wolffiella does not occur. sent4: if the bitting raid does not occur the abdication happens and the freezing TKO occurs. sent5: that the freezing reenactment does not occur is true. sent6: the freezing TKO does not occur if the abdication occurs. sent7: the unwariness does not occur. sent8: the keratinizing interestedness occurs. sent9: the fact that the axonalness does not occur is true. sent10: if the bitting raid happens then that the freezing TKO does not occur and the abdication does not occur does not hold. sent11: the conceptualization happens if the fact that the freezing TKO does not occur and the abdication does not occur is not correct. sent12: the freezing TKO happens. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abdication happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the freezing TKO does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there is something such that if it is not a tallyman then it is not rotational is incorrect. | ¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tallyman it is not rotational. sent2: if that the repertory is a tallyman is not wrong it is not rotational. sent3: if something does not freeze polytonality then it is not a kind of a Anaximander. sent4: the Sabine does not roughen if it is a tallyman. sent5: if the repertory is not a tallyman it is non-rotational. | sent1: (Ex): {B}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: {B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{DJ}x -> ¬{DM}x sent4: {B}{cs} -> ¬{CC}{cs} sent5: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it does not freeze polytonality it is not a Anaximander. | (Ex): ¬{DJ}x -> ¬{DM}x | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the Togolese does not freeze polytonality then it is not a Anaximander.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a tallyman then it is not rotational is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tallyman it is not rotational. sent2: if that the repertory is a tallyman is not wrong it is not rotational. sent3: if something does not freeze polytonality then it is not a kind of a Anaximander. sent4: the Sabine does not roughen if it is a tallyman. sent5: if the repertory is not a tallyman it is non-rotational. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the irrationalness happens. | {B} | sent1: if the fact that the pogonip happens and the secession happens is not right then the crustoseness does not occur. sent2: the importantness does not occur. sent3: not the adoration but the rest-cure occurs. sent4: that the freezing friskiness does not occur is not incorrect if the steeping Brahmi happens. sent5: the blinding does not occur. sent6: that the floating and the steeping rollerblader happens causes the non-irrationalness. sent7: the anacoluthicness happens and the renting occurs if the freezing sanitariness does not occur. sent8: not the floating but the steeping rollerblader happens. sent9: that the irrational and the electrophoreticness occurs is triggered by the non-crustoseness. sent10: if the float does not occur and the steeping rollerblader happens the irrationalness does not occur. sent11: the floating does not occur. sent12: that the pogonip happens and the secession occurs is not true if the freezing friskiness does not occur. sent13: if the pogonip happens then that that the electrophoreticness but not the crustoseness occurs is incorrect hold. sent14: the steeping Carcharhinus does not occur. sent15: if the anacoluthicness occurs that the steeping Brahmi happens is true. | sent1: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent2: ¬{DK} sent3: (¬{S} & {DU}) sent4: {G} -> ¬{F} sent5: ¬{O} sent6: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent7: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) sent8: (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent9: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) sent10: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent11: ¬{AA} sent12: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent13: {D} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) sent14: ¬{BS} sent15: {H} -> {G} | [
"sent10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent10 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| that the irrationalness occurs is not wrong. | {B} | []
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the irrationalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pogonip happens and the secession happens is not right then the crustoseness does not occur. sent2: the importantness does not occur. sent3: not the adoration but the rest-cure occurs. sent4: that the freezing friskiness does not occur is not incorrect if the steeping Brahmi happens. sent5: the blinding does not occur. sent6: that the floating and the steeping rollerblader happens causes the non-irrationalness. sent7: the anacoluthicness happens and the renting occurs if the freezing sanitariness does not occur. sent8: not the floating but the steeping rollerblader happens. sent9: that the irrational and the electrophoreticness occurs is triggered by the non-crustoseness. sent10: if the float does not occur and the steeping rollerblader happens the irrationalness does not occur. sent11: the floating does not occur. sent12: that the pogonip happens and the secession occurs is not true if the freezing friskiness does not occur. sent13: if the pogonip happens then that that the electrophoreticness but not the crustoseness occurs is incorrect hold. sent14: the steeping Carcharhinus does not occur. sent15: if the anacoluthicness occurs that the steeping Brahmi happens is true. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the yoga occurs. | {E} | sent1: if the steeping membership does not occur the freezing Lorentz occurs. sent2: the magnetizing does not occur. sent3: the minimalness is brought about by the steeping disavowal. sent4: if the wiring happens the finale happens. sent5: if the illiterate does not occur or the retrenchment does not occur or both the fact that the apprenticeship occurs hold. sent6: that the yoga does not occur is prevented by that the minimalness happens. | sent1: ¬{ED} -> {FJ} sent2: ¬{A} sent3: {C} -> {D} sent4: {HU} -> {BD} sent5: (¬{IS} v ¬{DJ}) -> {CS} sent6: {D} -> {E} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the magnetizing does not occur and/or the sweating does not occur.;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: (¬{A} v ¬{B});"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the yoga occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the steeping membership does not occur the freezing Lorentz occurs. sent2: the magnetizing does not occur. sent3: the minimalness is brought about by the steeping disavowal. sent4: if the wiring happens the finale happens. sent5: if the illiterate does not occur or the retrenchment does not occur or both the fact that the apprenticeship occurs hold. sent6: that the yoga does not occur is prevented by that the minimalness happens. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the magnetizing does not occur and/or the sweating does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the coke is non-cortical. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: if there exists something such that that it is both postal and not a ptarmigan is correct the wiesenboden is not a Brya. sent2: the coke is a Monod. sent3: the visionary is cortical. sent4: the coke is cortical. sent5: the coke is a Gabriel. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a Brya the Chain is not a mastectomy and/or it does not wet. sent7: something is postal but it is not a ptarmigan. sent8: if something freezes bonus then the fact that it is not a pepperwort and it does not keratinize novelist is incorrect. sent9: that the cadmium is cortical hold. sent10: something is cortical thing that is a pepperwort if the fact that it is not prewar is not wrong. sent11: if that something is both cortical and not non-prewar is not true it is not cortical. sent12: if the fact that the motel is not a mastectomy is not incorrect then the coke freezes bonus and does not keratinize novelist. sent13: the meadowlark is cortical. sent14: everything freezes bonus. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a mastectomy and/or it does not wet the motel is not a mastectomy. | sent1: (x): ({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{G}{d} sent2: {HG}{a} sent3: {A}{ij} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: {GL}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) sent7: (Ex): ({I}x & ¬{J}x) sent8: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{E}x) sent9: {A}{k} sent10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent11: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent12: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent13: {A}{l} sent14: (x): {D}x sent15: (x): (¬{F}x v ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}{b} | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the brit is cortical. | {A}{ga} | [
"sent10 -> int1: if the brit is not prewar it is cortical and it is a pepperwort.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the wiesenboden is not a Brya.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is not a Brya.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the Chain either is not a mastectomy or does not wet or both is correct.; int4 -> int5: something is not a kind of a mastectomy and/or it is not wet.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: the motel is not a mastectomy.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the coke freezes bonus and does not keratinize novelist.; int7 -> int8: something freezes bonus but it does not keratinize novelist.;"
]
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the coke is non-cortical. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is both postal and not a ptarmigan is correct the wiesenboden is not a Brya. sent2: the coke is a Monod. sent3: the visionary is cortical. sent4: the coke is cortical. sent5: the coke is a Gabriel. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a Brya the Chain is not a mastectomy and/or it does not wet. sent7: something is postal but it is not a ptarmigan. sent8: if something freezes bonus then the fact that it is not a pepperwort and it does not keratinize novelist is incorrect. sent9: that the cadmium is cortical hold. sent10: something is cortical thing that is a pepperwort if the fact that it is not prewar is not wrong. sent11: if that something is both cortical and not non-prewar is not true it is not cortical. sent12: if the fact that the motel is not a mastectomy is not incorrect then the coke freezes bonus and does not keratinize novelist. sent13: the meadowlark is cortical. sent14: everything freezes bonus. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a mastectomy and/or it does not wet the motel is not a mastectomy. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the flamethrower is acetic. | {D}{c} | sent1: if the prod speculates then it steeps naturalization. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a copper. sent3: the MA coppers. sent4: there is something such that it is not an alligator. sent5: if the fact that the prod is a copper is true then the flamethrower is acetic. sent6: the prod is not a BMDO and is acetic. sent7: something does not overwhelm. sent8: the flamethrower is not a copper if something is not acetic. sent9: something alligators. sent10: if the fact that the squill does steep ruler is correct then the flamethrower is not acetic but it does alligator. sent11: the procarbazine is not a Isis but acetic. sent12: the prod is a kind of a dishpan. sent13: the prod does not steep ruler. sent14: if something is not an alligator then the squill does not steep ruler. sent15: if that the gonococcus speculates and is non-peripteral is not correct then the prod does speculates. sent16: that the flamethrower does not steep ruler hold if there are non-acetic things. sent17: if the squill does not steep ruler the prod does not steep ruler. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not copper the prod does not steep ruler. | sent1: {G}{b} -> {E}{b} sent2: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent3: {C}{br} sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent5: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} sent6: (¬{BS}{b} & {D}{b}) sent7: (Ex): ¬{GM}x sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}{c} sent9: (Ex): {A}x sent10: {B}{a} -> (¬{D}{c} & {A}{c}) sent11: (¬{II}{jf} & {D}{jf}) sent12: {F}{b} sent13: ¬{B}{b} sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}{a} sent15: ¬({G}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> {G}{b} sent16: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{B}{c} sent17: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent18: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the squill does not steep ruler.;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent14 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
]
| that the flamethrower is not acetic is true. | ¬{D}{c} | []
| 8 | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the flamethrower is acetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the prod speculates then it steeps naturalization. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a copper. sent3: the MA coppers. sent4: there is something such that it is not an alligator. sent5: if the fact that the prod is a copper is true then the flamethrower is acetic. sent6: the prod is not a BMDO and is acetic. sent7: something does not overwhelm. sent8: the flamethrower is not a copper if something is not acetic. sent9: something alligators. sent10: if the fact that the squill does steep ruler is correct then the flamethrower is not acetic but it does alligator. sent11: the procarbazine is not a Isis but acetic. sent12: the prod is a kind of a dishpan. sent13: the prod does not steep ruler. sent14: if something is not an alligator then the squill does not steep ruler. sent15: if that the gonococcus speculates and is non-peripteral is not correct then the prod does speculates. sent16: that the flamethrower does not steep ruler hold if there are non-acetic things. sent17: if the squill does not steep ruler the prod does not steep ruler. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not copper the prod does not steep ruler. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the squill does not steep ruler.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the pepticness does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: if the fact that the freezing digit does not occur is not wrong then both the freezing phytotherapy and the pepticness happens. sent2: the pepticness and the freezing digit occurs. sent3: if the keratinizing oxycephaly happens and the approachableness does not occur then the freezing digit occurs. | sent1: ¬{B} -> ({DL} & {A}) sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: ({D} & ¬{C}) -> {B} | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the freezing phytotherapy happens. | {DL} | []
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pepticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the freezing digit does not occur is not wrong then both the freezing phytotherapy and the pepticness happens. sent2: the pepticness and the freezing digit occurs. sent3: if the keratinizing oxycephaly happens and the approachableness does not occur then the freezing digit occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Shylock is not blastomycotic. | ¬{AB}{b} | sent1: the contortionist is blastomycotic. sent2: the Shylock is not geopolitical but blastomycotic if the wester is unrhythmical. sent3: the stilt does keratinize cholesterol if something that is not impolite is not a pinkness. sent4: the wester is unrhythmical. sent5: everything is not prolusory. sent6: the wester is not a nanometer but a twinge. sent7: that something is not impolite and it is not a kind of a pinkness if it is not prolusory is not incorrect. | sent1: {AB}{dn} sent2: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent3: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {B}{c} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{E}x sent6: (¬{P}{a} & {CA}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the Shylock is not geopolitical and is blastomycotic is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the Shylock is not blastomycotic. | ¬{AB}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int2: if the chipotle is not prolusory then it is not impolite and is not a pinkness.; sent5 -> int3: the chipotle is not prolusory.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chipotle is not impolite and it is not a pinkness.; int4 -> int5: the fact that everything is not impolite and is not a kind of a pinkness is true.; int5 -> int6: the southeast is polite thing that is not a kind of a pinkness.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not impolite and not a pinkness.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the stilt keratinizes cholesterol.;"
]
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Shylock is not blastomycotic. ; $context$ = sent1: the contortionist is blastomycotic. sent2: the Shylock is not geopolitical but blastomycotic if the wester is unrhythmical. sent3: the stilt does keratinize cholesterol if something that is not impolite is not a pinkness. sent4: the wester is unrhythmical. sent5: everything is not prolusory. sent6: the wester is not a nanometer but a twinge. sent7: that something is not impolite and it is not a kind of a pinkness if it is not prolusory is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the Shylock is not geopolitical and is blastomycotic is true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the stamp occurs. | {D} | sent1: the ohmage occurs if the fact that the gift does not occur and the ohmage does not occur is wrong. sent2: if that the fact that both the stamp and the subjunctiveness occurs hold is wrong the stamp does not occur. sent3: if that the keratinizing flintlock does not occur but the ways occurs is not right the ways does not occur. sent4: the emergence occurs. sent5: if the fact that the ohmage happens is not incorrect the freezing wurtzite does not occur. sent6: the fact that that both the ways and the mononuclearness happens is right does not hold if that the stamp does not occur is not false. sent7: if the luckiness does not occur not the mononuclearness but the emergence happens. sent8: the mononuclearness occurs if the subjunctiveness happens and/or the ways does not occur. sent9: that the freezing wurtzite does not occur leads to that not the advertising but the steeping pompon happens. sent10: if the olfactoriness happens that the gift does not occur and the ohmage does not occur is wrong. sent11: if the luckiness happens the fact that the emergence does not occur and the keratinizing flintlock does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the mononuclearness happens the stamp occurs. sent13: the luckiness occurs and the keratinizing Arabic does not occur if the advertising does not occur. sent14: the subjunctive occurs and/or the ways occurs. sent15: that the stamp occurs and the subjunctiveness happens is not right if the ways does not occur. sent16: if the ways does not occur the mononuclearness occurs. sent17: the subjunctiveness occurs. sent18: the subjunctive occurs and the comprehensibleness happens if the ways does not occur. | sent1: ¬(¬{N} & ¬{L}) -> {L} sent2: ¬({D} & {A}) -> ¬{D} sent3: ¬(¬{E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent4: {F} sent5: {L} -> ¬{K} sent6: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & {C}) sent7: ¬{G} -> (¬{C} & {F}) sent8: ({A} v ¬{B}) -> {C} sent9: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) sent10: {M} -> ¬(¬{N} & ¬{L}) sent11: {G} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) sent12: {C} -> {D} sent13: ¬{I} -> ({G} & ¬{H}) sent14: ({A} v {B}) sent15: ¬{B} -> ¬({D} & {A}) sent16: ¬{B} -> {C} sent17: {A} sent18: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {EI}) | [
"sent17 -> int1: the subjunctive happens and/or the ways does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the mononuclearness happens.; sent12 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent17 -> int1: ({A} v ¬{B}); sent8 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent12 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the stamp does not occur. | ¬{D} | []
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stamp occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the ohmage occurs if the fact that the gift does not occur and the ohmage does not occur is wrong. sent2: if that the fact that both the stamp and the subjunctiveness occurs hold is wrong the stamp does not occur. sent3: if that the keratinizing flintlock does not occur but the ways occurs is not right the ways does not occur. sent4: the emergence occurs. sent5: if the fact that the ohmage happens is not incorrect the freezing wurtzite does not occur. sent6: the fact that that both the ways and the mononuclearness happens is right does not hold if that the stamp does not occur is not false. sent7: if the luckiness does not occur not the mononuclearness but the emergence happens. sent8: the mononuclearness occurs if the subjunctiveness happens and/or the ways does not occur. sent9: that the freezing wurtzite does not occur leads to that not the advertising but the steeping pompon happens. sent10: if the olfactoriness happens that the gift does not occur and the ohmage does not occur is wrong. sent11: if the luckiness happens the fact that the emergence does not occur and the keratinizing flintlock does not occur does not hold. sent12: if the mononuclearness happens the stamp occurs. sent13: the luckiness occurs and the keratinizing Arabic does not occur if the advertising does not occur. sent14: the subjunctive occurs and/or the ways occurs. sent15: that the stamp occurs and the subjunctiveness happens is not right if the ways does not occur. sent16: if the ways does not occur the mononuclearness occurs. sent17: the subjunctiveness occurs. sent18: the subjunctive occurs and the comprehensibleness happens if the ways does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> int1: the subjunctive happens and/or the ways does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the mononuclearness happens.; sent12 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pectoralness does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the animist happens. sent2: the pectoralness occurs if the hiplessness happens. sent3: that the hearing does not occur if the ballisticness occurs is correct. sent4: if the animist happens then the hiplessness occurs. sent5: both the ballisticness and the pandemic happens if the slapping does not occur. sent6: the fact that if that the hearing does not occur is not false that the identification does not occur and the pectoral does not occur is false is not incorrect. | sent1: {A} sent2: {B} -> {C} sent3: {F} -> ¬{E} sent4: {A} -> {B} sent5: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent6: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) | [
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the hiplessness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent1 -> int1: {B}; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the bitting night-sight happens. | {DR} | []
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pectoralness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the animist happens. sent2: the pectoralness occurs if the hiplessness happens. sent3: that the hearing does not occur if the ballisticness occurs is correct. sent4: if the animist happens then the hiplessness occurs. sent5: both the ballisticness and the pandemic happens if the slapping does not occur. sent6: the fact that if that the hearing does not occur is not false that the identification does not occur and the pectoral does not occur is false is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the hiplessness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the regulation does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: if the provision does not occur the deepness occurs. sent2: if the steeping corvette happens then the non-paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness occurs. sent3: the paperiness and/or the freezing inactivation is triggered by the incommutableness. sent4: that the regulation occurs is prevented by that the shutout happens and the deepness occurs. sent5: the slenderizing does not occur if the paperiness occurs. sent6: if the incitation happens the steeping corvette occurs. sent7: the regulation is brought about by that the provisioning occurs. sent8: the fact that the provision but not the leaning occurs is not true. sent9: that the provision does not occur and the leaning happens is triggered by that the handover does not occur. sent10: the commutableness does not occur. sent11: the bitting liberality occurs. sent12: the incitation occurs and the embarking happens if the slenderizing does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness occurs is false the handover does not occur. sent14: if the bitting liberality happens then the shutout happens. sent15: if the non-paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness happens then the handover does not occur. sent16: the provisioning and the non-leanness happens if the handover does not occur. sent17: the deep happens if that that the provision happens but the leanness does not occur is not false is not right. | sent1: ¬{E} -> {C} sent2: {J} -> (¬{I} & ¬{H}) sent3: ¬{P} -> ({N} v {O}) sent4: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent5: {N} -> ¬{M} sent6: {K} -> {J} sent7: {E} -> {D} sent8: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) sent9: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent10: ¬{P} sent11: {A} sent12: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L}) sent13: ¬({I} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} sent14: {A} -> {B} sent15: (¬{I} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} sent16: ¬{G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) sent17: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) -> {C} | [
"sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the shutout happens.; sent17 & sent8 -> int2: the deepness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shutout happens and the deepness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent14 & sent11 -> int1: {B}; sent17 & sent8 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the regulation happens. | {D} | []
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the regulation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the provision does not occur the deepness occurs. sent2: if the steeping corvette happens then the non-paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness occurs. sent3: the paperiness and/or the freezing inactivation is triggered by the incommutableness. sent4: that the regulation occurs is prevented by that the shutout happens and the deepness occurs. sent5: the slenderizing does not occur if the paperiness occurs. sent6: if the incitation happens the steeping corvette occurs. sent7: the regulation is brought about by that the provisioning occurs. sent8: the fact that the provision but not the leaning occurs is not true. sent9: that the provision does not occur and the leaning happens is triggered by that the handover does not occur. sent10: the commutableness does not occur. sent11: the bitting liberality occurs. sent12: the incitation occurs and the embarking happens if the slenderizing does not occur. sent13: if the fact that the paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness occurs is false the handover does not occur. sent14: if the bitting liberality happens then the shutout happens. sent15: if the non-paleoanthropologicalness and the non-cytokineticness happens then the handover does not occur. sent16: the provisioning and the non-leanness happens if the handover does not occur. sent17: the deep happens if that that the provision happens but the leanness does not occur is not false is not right. ; $proof$ = | sent14 & sent11 -> int1: the shutout happens.; sent17 & sent8 -> int2: the deepness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shutout happens and the deepness occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the mimeograph is both not cytoarchitectural and astronomic is not correct. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | sent1: the mimeograph does steep viceroy if it is a Adenauer. sent2: the mimeograph does not steep viceroy if the declension does not steep viceroy and it is not shockable. sent3: the fact that the mimeograph is a kind of cytoarchitectural thing that is astronomic does not hold if it steeps viceroy. sent4: that something is cytoarchitectural and is astronomic is incorrect if it steeps viceroy. sent5: if the fact that the mimeograph is a decimal is right that it is non-astronomic thing that is a kind of a buteonine is wrong. sent6: the fact that something is not a Halimodendron and is cytoarchitectural is not true if it does not steep viceroy. sent7: the fact that the reluctance is pointless is right if the monohydrate is caecilian. sent8: the fact that the mimeograph is cytoarchitectural and it is astronomic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the tentorium does not bitt holiday is right if the bagger is pointless. sent10: the mimeograph is a Adenauer. sent11: something is a kind of a caecilian if it coalesces. sent12: something is both a Adenauer and a screw if it does not bitt holiday. sent13: the chiropractor is astronomic. sent14: the declension is a Adenauer if the tentorium is a Adenauer. sent15: the monohydrate coalesces. sent16: the Caucasian is astronomic. sent17: if that the declension does steep viceroy is not false the fact that the mimeograph is both non-cytoarchitectural and astronomic is true. sent18: the bagger is not pointed if the reluctance is pointed. | sent1: {B}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent2: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: {BR}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AB}{aa} & {IH}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{BE}x & {AA}x) sent7: {G}{e} -> {F}{d} sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: {F}{c} -> ¬{E}{b} sent10: {B}{aa} sent11: (x): {H}x -> {G}x sent12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) sent13: {AB}{bd} sent14: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent15: {H}{e} sent16: {AB}{gp} sent17: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent18: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} | [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the mimeograph does steep viceroy.;"
]
| [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: {A}{aa};"
]
| the fact that the mimeograph is both not a Halimodendron and cytoarchitectural is not right. | ¬(¬{BE}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) | [
"sent6 -> int2: that the mimeograph is not a Halimodendron but it is cytoarchitectural is not true if it does not steep viceroy.; sent12 -> int3: if the tentorium does not bitt holiday then it is a Adenauer and a screw.; sent11 -> int4: the monohydrate is a caecilian if it does coalesce.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the monohydrate is not non-caecilian.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the reluctance is pointless.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the bagger is pointless.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: that the tentorium does not bitt holiday is correct.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the tentorium is a Adenauer that screws.; int9 -> int10: the tentorium is a Adenauer.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the declension is a Adenauer.;"
]
| 11 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the mimeograph is both not cytoarchitectural and astronomic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the mimeograph does steep viceroy if it is a Adenauer. sent2: the mimeograph does not steep viceroy if the declension does not steep viceroy and it is not shockable. sent3: the fact that the mimeograph is a kind of cytoarchitectural thing that is astronomic does not hold if it steeps viceroy. sent4: that something is cytoarchitectural and is astronomic is incorrect if it steeps viceroy. sent5: if the fact that the mimeograph is a decimal is right that it is non-astronomic thing that is a kind of a buteonine is wrong. sent6: the fact that something is not a Halimodendron and is cytoarchitectural is not true if it does not steep viceroy. sent7: the fact that the reluctance is pointless is right if the monohydrate is caecilian. sent8: the fact that the mimeograph is cytoarchitectural and it is astronomic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the tentorium does not bitt holiday is right if the bagger is pointless. sent10: the mimeograph is a Adenauer. sent11: something is a kind of a caecilian if it coalesces. sent12: something is both a Adenauer and a screw if it does not bitt holiday. sent13: the chiropractor is astronomic. sent14: the declension is a Adenauer if the tentorium is a Adenauer. sent15: the monohydrate coalesces. sent16: the Caucasian is astronomic. sent17: if that the declension does steep viceroy is not false the fact that the mimeograph is both non-cytoarchitectural and astronomic is true. sent18: the bagger is not pointed if the reluctance is pointed. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the mimeograph does steep viceroy.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the skidding does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: if that both the non-thriftyness and the painfulness occurs is not correct then the licensing does not occur. sent2: the bagatelle does not occur. sent3: the skidding does not occur if the fact that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the fact that both the non-asexualness and the non-deepness happens is wrong. sent5: the blizzard does not occur. sent6: that the steeping Clathrus happens leads to the skid. sent7: the fact that both the steeping Clathrus and the circulativeness happens is true if the impoundment does not occur. sent8: that the Nazareneness happens and the kip does not occur is not true. sent9: the circulativeness happens. | sent1: ¬(¬{EM} & ¬{EJ}) -> ¬{F} sent2: ¬{DK} sent3: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬(¬{EG} & ¬{IS}) sent5: ¬{IJ} sent6: {A} -> {C} sent7: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {B}) sent8: ¬({HG} & ¬{AB}) sent9: {B} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the circulativeness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur is false.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent9 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the skid happens. | {C} | []
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the skidding does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the non-thriftyness and the painfulness occurs is not correct then the licensing does not occur. sent2: the bagatelle does not occur. sent3: the skidding does not occur if the fact that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur is incorrect. sent4: the fact that both the non-asexualness and the non-deepness happens is wrong. sent5: the blizzard does not occur. sent6: that the steeping Clathrus happens leads to the skid. sent7: the fact that both the steeping Clathrus and the circulativeness happens is true if the impoundment does not occur. sent8: that the Nazareneness happens and the kip does not occur is not true. sent9: the circulativeness happens. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the circulativeness does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the steeping Clathrus does not occur and the circulativeness does not occur is false.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | both the freezing pince-nez and the ostomy happens. | ({C} & {D}) | sent1: the Tongan happens. sent2: the cartage does not occur. sent3: that the anaplasty happens is not wrong if the fact that the camping occurs is right. sent4: the antiapartheidness occurs. sent5: the duplication happens. sent6: the rarefaction occurs and the stinginess happens if the clonalness does not occur. sent7: the prismaticness does not occur. sent8: the laziness happens. sent9: if the prismaticness does not occur then the fertileness happens. sent10: the freezing pince-nez happens if the stinginess occurs. sent11: the conservancy occurs. sent12: if that the unpropheticness does not occur is not wrong that the prismaticness happens and the fertileness occurs is not correct. sent13: the smuggling occurs. sent14: the stinginess happens and the clonalness happens. sent15: if the fertileness does not occur then both the non-stingyness and the non-clonalness happens. sent16: if the stinginess does not occur then the fact that both the freezing pince-nez and the ostomy occurs is false. sent17: the generationalness occurs. sent18: the raiding occurs and the keratinizing pikeblenny happens. sent19: the unpropheticness does not occur if the fact that the Hadith happens but the camping does not occur is not correct. sent20: if the etiology does not occur then that the Hadith but not the camping happens does not hold. sent21: the keratinizing deoxythymidine occurs. | sent1: {CB} sent2: ¬{AE} sent3: {I} -> {DS} sent4: {HO} sent5: {FA} sent6: ¬{B} -> ({HC} & {A}) sent7: ¬{F} sent8: {CM} sent9: ¬{F} -> {E} sent10: {A} -> {C} sent11: {GG} sent12: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & {E}) sent13: {BG} sent14: ({A} & {B}) sent15: ¬{E} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent16: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent17: {HT} sent18: ({FL} & {ER}) sent19: ¬({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} sent20: ¬{J} -> ¬({H} & ¬{I}) sent21: {FK} | [
"sent14 -> int1: the stinginess occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the freezing pince-nez happens.;"
]
| [
"sent14 -> int1: {A}; int1 & sent10 -> int2: {C};"
]
| the rarefaction occurs and the freezing rejection occurs. | ({HC} & {HE}) | []
| 5 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the freezing pince-nez and the ostomy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tongan happens. sent2: the cartage does not occur. sent3: that the anaplasty happens is not wrong if the fact that the camping occurs is right. sent4: the antiapartheidness occurs. sent5: the duplication happens. sent6: the rarefaction occurs and the stinginess happens if the clonalness does not occur. sent7: the prismaticness does not occur. sent8: the laziness happens. sent9: if the prismaticness does not occur then the fertileness happens. sent10: the freezing pince-nez happens if the stinginess occurs. sent11: the conservancy occurs. sent12: if that the unpropheticness does not occur is not wrong that the prismaticness happens and the fertileness occurs is not correct. sent13: the smuggling occurs. sent14: the stinginess happens and the clonalness happens. sent15: if the fertileness does not occur then both the non-stingyness and the non-clonalness happens. sent16: if the stinginess does not occur then the fact that both the freezing pince-nez and the ostomy occurs is false. sent17: the generationalness occurs. sent18: the raiding occurs and the keratinizing pikeblenny happens. sent19: the unpropheticness does not occur if the fact that the Hadith happens but the camping does not occur is not correct. sent20: if the etiology does not occur then that the Hadith but not the camping happens does not hold. sent21: the keratinizing deoxythymidine occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> int1: the stinginess occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the freezing pince-nez happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the stomach is bridgeable. | {C}{a} | sent1: that something does bitt Villa but it is not nonfat is not true if the fact that it is a spring is not false. sent2: if something is a kind of a gluon it is not unbridgeable. sent3: if something does freeze ministrant then that it is not a gluon and/or does not keratinize Shockley does not hold. sent4: the quickset is an ephedrine but it does not spring if it is not a semifinal. sent5: if that the pudding-face does not bitt Villa and is nonfat is incorrect it does not freeze ministrant. sent6: if something does not freeze ministrant then that it keratinizes Shockley and it is a kind of a gluon is false. sent7: if the stomach is visceral it is a kind of a gluon. sent8: the fact that the ramp does spring is not wrong if the quickset is a kind of an ephedrine but it is not a spring. sent9: if something does not spring then that it does not bitt Villa and is nonfat is wrong. sent10: the stomach freezes ministrant if the pudding-face is nonfat. sent11: the norethynodrel is not visceral if the fact that the stomach is not a gluon or it does not keratinize Shockley or both is not true. sent12: if something does bitt educationist it is a unobtrusiveness. sent13: the quickset is not a semifinal. sent14: something is not bridgeable if it is not visceral. | sent1: (x): {H}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) sent2: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent3: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{D}x) sent4: ¬{I}{d} -> ({J}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) sent5: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {B}x) sent7: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: ({J}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> {H}{c} sent9: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) sent10: {F}{b} -> {E}{a} sent11: ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{da} sent12: (x): {AP}x -> {IF}x sent13: ¬{I}{d} sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: if that the stomach is a gluon is not false it is bridgeable.;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> int1: {B}{a} -> {C}{a};"
]
| the norethynodrel is bridgeable. | {C}{da} | [
"sent3 -> int2: if the stomach does freeze ministrant then that it is not a gluon and/or it does not keratinize Shockley is not right.; sent1 -> int3: if the ramp is a kind of a spring the fact that it does bitt Villa and is not nonfat is not right.; sent4 & sent13 -> int4: the quickset is both an ephedrine and not a spring.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the ramp is a spring.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the ramp bitts Villa and is not nonfat is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it bitts Villa and it is not nonfat does not hold.;"
]
| 9 | 2 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stomach is bridgeable. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does bitt Villa but it is not nonfat is not true if the fact that it is a spring is not false. sent2: if something is a kind of a gluon it is not unbridgeable. sent3: if something does freeze ministrant then that it is not a gluon and/or does not keratinize Shockley does not hold. sent4: the quickset is an ephedrine but it does not spring if it is not a semifinal. sent5: if that the pudding-face does not bitt Villa and is nonfat is incorrect it does not freeze ministrant. sent6: if something does not freeze ministrant then that it keratinizes Shockley and it is a kind of a gluon is false. sent7: if the stomach is visceral it is a kind of a gluon. sent8: the fact that the ramp does spring is not wrong if the quickset is a kind of an ephedrine but it is not a spring. sent9: if something does not spring then that it does not bitt Villa and is nonfat is wrong. sent10: the stomach freezes ministrant if the pudding-face is nonfat. sent11: the norethynodrel is not visceral if the fact that the stomach is not a gluon or it does not keratinize Shockley or both is not true. sent12: if something does bitt educationist it is a unobtrusiveness. sent13: the quickset is not a semifinal. sent14: something is not bridgeable if it is not visceral. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if that the stomach is a gluon is not false it is bridgeable.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the rewa-rewa is autogenous thing that is not a libertarian is not right. | ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | sent1: the microfilm is a footplate and does bitt Guangzhou. sent2: that the rewa-rewa is proprioceptive but it is not a libertarian is not true. sent3: the thiabendazole is forcipate or it is not a kind of a lumper or both. sent4: the microfilm is both a footplate and a libertarian. sent5: the microfilm is a footplate. sent6: that the rewa-rewa is a kind of autogenous thing that is not a kind of a libertarian does not hold if the microfilm is a libertarian. sent7: the fact that the rewa-rewa is both autogenous and a libertarian does not hold if the microfilm is a libertarian. sent8: the fact that that the rewa-rewa is autogenous and it is a libertarian hold does not hold. sent9: the microfilm is autogenous. sent10: that that the microfilm is a lumper but it is not meridional does not hold is correct. sent11: the fact that the officiant is a libertarian is true. sent12: something that is gaseous is a meet. sent13: the trypsinogen does not steep Aengus if the thiabendazole is forcipate and it is a meet. sent14: if the trypsinogen does not steep Aengus then that the microfilm is not a cecum and it is not a footplate is not right. sent15: something is gaseous if it is exacta. sent16: the vestment is exacta. sent17: if the thiabendazole is forcipate and/or it is not a lumper then it is forcipate. sent18: if the vestment is not non-gaseous then the thiabendazole is non-gaseous. sent19: if the rewa-rewa is a libertarian that the microfilm is autogenous but it is not a kind of a libertarian is false. | sent1: ({A}{a} & {JK}{a}) sent2: ¬({DP}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent3: ({G}{d} v ¬{J}{d}) sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent7: {B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent8: ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent9: {D}{a} sent10: ¬({J}{a} & ¬{ER}{a}) sent11: {B}{aq} sent12: (x): {H}x -> {F}x sent13: ({G}{d} & {F}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent14: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent15: (x): {I}x -> {H}x sent16: {I}{e} sent17: ({G}{d} v ¬{J}{d}) -> {G}{d} sent18: {H}{e} -> {H}{d} sent19: {B}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the microfilm is a kind of a libertarian.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the rewa-rewa is autogenous but it is not a libertarian. | ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"sent17 & sent3 -> int2: that the thiabendazole is forcipate is correct.; sent12 -> int3: the thiabendazole is a meet if it is gaseous.; sent15 -> int4: the vestment is gaseous if it is exacta.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the vestment is gaseous.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the thiabendazole is gaseous.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the thiabendazole is a meet.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the thiabendazole is forcipate and it is a kind of a meet.; sent13 & int8 -> int9: the trypsinogen does not steep Aengus.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the microfilm is not a cecum and is not a kind of a footplate is incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a cecum and it is not a footplate does not hold.;"
]
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the rewa-rewa is autogenous thing that is not a libertarian is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the microfilm is a footplate and does bitt Guangzhou. sent2: that the rewa-rewa is proprioceptive but it is not a libertarian is not true. sent3: the thiabendazole is forcipate or it is not a kind of a lumper or both. sent4: the microfilm is both a footplate and a libertarian. sent5: the microfilm is a footplate. sent6: that the rewa-rewa is a kind of autogenous thing that is not a kind of a libertarian does not hold if the microfilm is a libertarian. sent7: the fact that the rewa-rewa is both autogenous and a libertarian does not hold if the microfilm is a libertarian. sent8: the fact that that the rewa-rewa is autogenous and it is a libertarian hold does not hold. sent9: the microfilm is autogenous. sent10: that that the microfilm is a lumper but it is not meridional does not hold is correct. sent11: the fact that the officiant is a libertarian is true. sent12: something that is gaseous is a meet. sent13: the trypsinogen does not steep Aengus if the thiabendazole is forcipate and it is a meet. sent14: if the trypsinogen does not steep Aengus then that the microfilm is not a cecum and it is not a footplate is not right. sent15: something is gaseous if it is exacta. sent16: the vestment is exacta. sent17: if the thiabendazole is forcipate and/or it is not a lumper then it is forcipate. sent18: if the vestment is not non-gaseous then the thiabendazole is non-gaseous. sent19: if the rewa-rewa is a libertarian that the microfilm is autogenous but it is not a kind of a libertarian is false. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: the microfilm is a kind of a libertarian.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the pelisse is not small. | ¬{A}{c} | sent1: if the bromoform does not steep brouhaha then it does not freeze Augustinian. sent2: if the hooch does not steep brouhaha and it is not a kind of an integral that the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian is true. sent3: the hooch does not wharf but it is a outwork. sent4: the fact that the pelisse does freeze Augustinian and discharges is incorrect if the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian. sent5: the hooch does not steep brouhaha and is not a kind of an integral. sent6: if that the pelisse does freeze Augustinian and it discharges is wrong then it is not a small. | sent1: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}) sent5: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent6: ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{c} | [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pelisse freezes Augustinian and is a discharged is not right.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 & sent5 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}); int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the pelisse is small. | {A}{c} | [
"sent3 -> int3: the hooch does not wharf.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not wharf.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pelisse is not small. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bromoform does not steep brouhaha then it does not freeze Augustinian. sent2: if the hooch does not steep brouhaha and it is not a kind of an integral that the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian is true. sent3: the hooch does not wharf but it is a outwork. sent4: the fact that the pelisse does freeze Augustinian and discharges is incorrect if the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian. sent5: the hooch does not steep brouhaha and is not a kind of an integral. sent6: if that the pelisse does freeze Augustinian and it discharges is wrong then it is not a small. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the bromoform does not freeze Augustinian.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pelisse freezes Augustinian and is a discharged is not right.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the milk-vetch is an underachiever. | {AB}{aa} | sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a gabbro then the ghoul is Balzacian and it is a combo. sent2: if that something is not immoral is not incorrect then it does not freeze outwork and is not a kind of a Nubian. sent3: if the fact that the methane is not a kind of a combo hold that the ghoul is not immoral and/or it does freeze outwork does not hold. sent4: if the milk-vetch does freeze canola and does not freeze outwork then it is not a Nubian. sent5: the rivulus is not Balzacian but it is a kind of an underachiever. sent6: if something is not testaceous but it is a snap it is not a gabbro. sent7: if the fact that the outwork is a kind of a Nubian and/or it is an underachiever is not true then the milk-vetch is not an underachiever. sent8: the milk-vetch is not unsocial. sent9: the acrodont is not a Nubian. sent10: the scheelite is Guatemalan if that the calpac is not Peloponnesian and not a brush-off does not hold. sent11: the milk-vetch is plumbaginaceous but it is non-demographic. sent12: if the outwork does not freeze outwork and it is not a Nubian the checkout freezes canola. sent13: the methane snaps. sent14: something is immoral and does steep subnormal if the fact that it does not immobilize hold. sent15: the milk-vetch does freeze canola but it does not freeze outwork. sent16: something is a kind of non-demographic thing that is an underachiever if the fact that it is not a Nubian is not incorrect. sent17: if something does not freeze canola the fact that it is a Nubian and/or is a kind of an underachiever is wrong. sent18: the outwork is not immoral if the ghoul is both not non-Balzacian and not immoral. sent19: if the scheelite is Guatemalan the ghoul does not immobilize and is an eyesore. sent20: the fathead does not steep subnormal and is a kind of a mound. sent21: the fact that the methane is not testaceous hold. sent22: that the calpac is not Peloponnesian and not a brush-off is incorrect. sent23: the milk-vetch does freeze canola. | sent1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}{b} & {E}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent3: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} v {C}{b}) sent4: ({B}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent5: (¬{F}{j} & {AB}{j}) sent6: (x): (¬{M}x & {L}x) -> ¬{H}x sent7: ¬({A}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent8: ¬{CA}{aa} sent9: ¬{A}{is} sent10: ¬(¬{O}{e} & ¬{N}{e}) -> {K}{d} sent11: ({HG}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent12: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {B}{gd} sent13: {L}{c} sent14: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({D}x & {G}x) sent15: ({B}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x v {AB}x) sent18: ({F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent19: {K}{d} -> (¬{I}{b} & {J}{b}) sent20: (¬{G}{bk} & {HD}{bk}) sent21: ¬{M}{c} sent22: ¬(¬{O}{e} & ¬{N}{e}) sent23: {B}{aa} | [
"sent16 -> int1: the milk-vetch is a kind of non-demographic an underachiever if it is not a kind of a Nubian.; sent4 & sent15 -> int2: the milk-vetch is not a Nubian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the milk-vetch is not a kind of a demographic but it is an underachiever.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent16 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent4 & sent15 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the milk-vetch is not a kind of an underachiever. | ¬{AB}{aa} | [
"sent17 -> int4: the fact that either the outwork is a Nubian or it is an underachiever or both is not right if it does not freeze canola.;"
]
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the milk-vetch is an underachiever. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is not a gabbro then the ghoul is Balzacian and it is a combo. sent2: if that something is not immoral is not incorrect then it does not freeze outwork and is not a kind of a Nubian. sent3: if the fact that the methane is not a kind of a combo hold that the ghoul is not immoral and/or it does freeze outwork does not hold. sent4: if the milk-vetch does freeze canola and does not freeze outwork then it is not a Nubian. sent5: the rivulus is not Balzacian but it is a kind of an underachiever. sent6: if something is not testaceous but it is a snap it is not a gabbro. sent7: if the fact that the outwork is a kind of a Nubian and/or it is an underachiever is not true then the milk-vetch is not an underachiever. sent8: the milk-vetch is not unsocial. sent9: the acrodont is not a Nubian. sent10: the scheelite is Guatemalan if that the calpac is not Peloponnesian and not a brush-off does not hold. sent11: the milk-vetch is plumbaginaceous but it is non-demographic. sent12: if the outwork does not freeze outwork and it is not a Nubian the checkout freezes canola. sent13: the methane snaps. sent14: something is immoral and does steep subnormal if the fact that it does not immobilize hold. sent15: the milk-vetch does freeze canola but it does not freeze outwork. sent16: something is a kind of non-demographic thing that is an underachiever if the fact that it is not a Nubian is not incorrect. sent17: if something does not freeze canola the fact that it is a Nubian and/or is a kind of an underachiever is wrong. sent18: the outwork is not immoral if the ghoul is both not non-Balzacian and not immoral. sent19: if the scheelite is Guatemalan the ghoul does not immobilize and is an eyesore. sent20: the fathead does not steep subnormal and is a kind of a mound. sent21: the fact that the methane is not testaceous hold. sent22: that the calpac is not Peloponnesian and not a brush-off is incorrect. sent23: the milk-vetch does freeze canola. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: the milk-vetch is a kind of non-demographic an underachiever if it is not a kind of a Nubian.; sent4 & sent15 -> int2: the milk-vetch is not a Nubian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the milk-vetch is not a kind of a demographic but it is an underachiever.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the nestling happens. | {C} | sent1: the antisepticizing hallux happens. sent2: that the reissuing photoelectron does not occur and the dabbing does not occur is false if the fact that the underhandness does not occur hold. sent3: the aestheticsness happens. sent4: the dab does not occur. sent5: the nestling occurs if the reissuing photoelectron occurs. sent6: that the adenoidalness occurs prevents that the antisepticizing pylon does not occur. sent7: the reissuing photoelectron happens but the dabbing does not occur. | sent1: {HJ} sent2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent3: {AB} sent4: ¬{B} sent5: {A} -> {C} sent6: {GL} -> {GQ} sent7: ({A} & ¬{B}) | [
"sent7 -> int1: the reissuing photoelectron occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent7 -> int1: {A}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the nestling does not occur. | ¬{C} | []
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nestling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the antisepticizing hallux happens. sent2: that the reissuing photoelectron does not occur and the dabbing does not occur is false if the fact that the underhandness does not occur hold. sent3: the aestheticsness happens. sent4: the dab does not occur. sent5: the nestling occurs if the reissuing photoelectron occurs. sent6: that the adenoidalness occurs prevents that the antisepticizing pylon does not occur. sent7: the reissuing photoelectron happens but the dabbing does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: the reissuing photoelectron occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Californian is a kind of intracellular thing that is not a columbine. | ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | sent1: that the Californian is both intracellular and not a columbine does not hold if it is a kabob. sent2: the Cimarron is not a kabob. sent3: the Californian is intracellular but not a kabob. sent4: the Californian is a kind of a columbine but it is not a kabob if the Cimarron is not intracellular. sent5: the Californian is intracellular and is not a columbine if the Cimarron is not a kind of a kabob. sent6: the Californian is both unforgettable and not a hotchpotch. sent7: if the Cimarron is not a kind of a kabob then the Californian is intracellular. sent8: if the Californian is not intracellular the Cimarron is a kind of a columbine but it is not a kabob. sent9: the fact that the Californian is not intracellular does not hold. sent10: the Cimarron is a kind of a present but it is not a mood. sent11: the Cimarron is intracellular but it is not a kabob if the Californian is not a kind of a columbine. | sent1: {A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: ({AA}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent4: ¬{AA}{a} -> ({AB}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent6: ({EM}{b} & ¬{GF}{b}) sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{b} sent8: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent9: {AA}{b} sent10: ({FJ}{a} & ¬{IT}{a}) sent11: ¬{AB}{b} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the fact that the Californian is both intracellular and not a columbine is incorrect. | ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | []
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Californian is a kind of intracellular thing that is not a columbine. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Californian is both intracellular and not a columbine does not hold if it is a kabob. sent2: the Cimarron is not a kabob. sent3: the Californian is intracellular but not a kabob. sent4: the Californian is a kind of a columbine but it is not a kabob if the Cimarron is not intracellular. sent5: the Californian is intracellular and is not a columbine if the Cimarron is not a kind of a kabob. sent6: the Californian is both unforgettable and not a hotchpotch. sent7: if the Cimarron is not a kind of a kabob then the Californian is intracellular. sent8: if the Californian is not intracellular the Cimarron is a kind of a columbine but it is not a kabob. sent9: the fact that the Californian is not intracellular does not hold. sent10: the Cimarron is a kind of a present but it is not a mood. sent11: the Cimarron is intracellular but it is not a kabob if the Californian is not a kind of a columbine. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the hemisphere unmans photoelectron. | {E}{a} | sent1: the prawn is topographical. sent2: the fact that the hemisphere is not a stupid and it is not topographical is not right. sent3: that something is not a spongefly and it is not topographical is not correct if it is fruitful. sent4: that the hemisphere is a spongefly but it is not topographical is incorrect. sent5: the hemisphere does unman photoelectron if it is a spongefly. sent6: the fact that the hemisphere is a spongefly but it is not topographical is not right if it is fruitful. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a watchtower is not fruitful it does not unman photoelectron. sent8: the hemisphere is a watchtower. sent9: if the hemisphere is a watchtower then it is fruitful. sent10: a spongefly unmans photoelectron. sent11: the fact that something is a spongefly but it is not topographical does not hold if it is fruitful. | sent1: {C}{q} sent2: ¬(¬{JI}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent3: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) sent4: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: {D}{a} -> {E}{a} sent6: {B}{a} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent7: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{E}x sent8: {A}{a} sent9: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent11: (x): {B}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) | [
"sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the hemisphere is fruitful.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the hemisphere is not a spongefly and not topographical does not hold if it is fruitful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hemisphere is both not a spongefly and not topographical is false.;"
]
| [
"sent9 & sent8 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent3 -> int2: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
]
| the hemisphere does not unman photoelectron. | ¬{E}{a} | [
"sent7 -> int4: the hemisphere does not unman photoelectron if it is not a watchtower and it is not fruitful.;"
]
| 5 | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the hemisphere unmans photoelectron. ; $context$ = sent1: the prawn is topographical. sent2: the fact that the hemisphere is not a stupid and it is not topographical is not right. sent3: that something is not a spongefly and it is not topographical is not correct if it is fruitful. sent4: that the hemisphere is a spongefly but it is not topographical is incorrect. sent5: the hemisphere does unman photoelectron if it is a spongefly. sent6: the fact that the hemisphere is a spongefly but it is not topographical is not right if it is fruitful. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a watchtower is not fruitful it does not unman photoelectron. sent8: the hemisphere is a watchtower. sent9: if the hemisphere is a watchtower then it is fruitful. sent10: a spongefly unmans photoelectron. sent11: the fact that something is a spongefly but it is not topographical does not hold if it is fruitful. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the hemisphere is fruitful.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the hemisphere is not a spongefly and not topographical does not hold if it is fruitful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hemisphere is both not a spongefly and not topographical is false.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the linuron is a kind of a hydroxyzine. | {C}{b} | sent1: the tobogganist is not a miscalculation. sent2: something does not reissue Characidae if the fact that it reissue Characidae and it is a kind of a miscalculation is not true. sent3: that the sandarac is not an anteater and it is not aortal is not correct. sent4: the linuron is not wieldy but it reissues whoop if it antisepticizes jactitation. sent5: the fact that the linuron is both proteolytic and not Timorese is not correct if there exists something such that it is not proteolytic. sent6: if something that does reissue whoop does not reissue Characidae then the Ischia does perfect. sent7: something is not antimonic and it is not a hydroxyzine if it perfects. sent8: if the fact that the linuron is proteolytic but it is not Timorese is incorrect it is not a Ascension. sent9: if the linuron is not a Ascension that it does not antisepticize jactitation and it reissues A-horizon is incorrect. sent10: that the linuron is both not antimonic and a grizzle is not true if the sandarac is antimonic. sent11: if something is not antimonic and it is not a hydroxyzine then it is a grizzle. sent12: there exists something such that it is not proteolytic. sent13: if the fact that something is a kind of non-antimonic thing that is a grizzle is not right then it is a kind of a hydroxyzine. sent14: the tobogganist is not perfected. sent15: the fact that the sandarac does reissue Characidae and is a kind of a miscalculation is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a miscalculation. sent16: if that something does not antisepticize jactitation and reissues A-horizon is false then it antisepticize jactitation. sent17: if the fact that the collagen is a kind of non-antimonic thing that is not a Timorese is wrong the fact that it is a sore is right. sent18: if the linuron is not wieldy and reissues whoop then the sandarac reissues whoop. | sent1: ¬{G}{c} sent2: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: {I}{b} -> (¬{H}{b} & {E}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬({L}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) sent6: (x): ({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}{aa} sent7: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) sent8: ¬({L}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) -> ¬{J}{b} sent9: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{I}{b} & {K}{b}) sent10: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent11: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x sent12: (Ex): ¬{L}x sent13: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x sent14: ¬{D}{c} sent15: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}{a} & {G}{a}) sent16: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {K}x) -> {I}x sent17: ¬(¬{B}{dm} & ¬{M}{dm}) -> {CP}{dm} sent18: (¬{H}{b} & {E}{b}) -> {E}{a} | [
"sent13 -> int1: the linuron is a kind of a hydroxyzine if that it is a kind of non-antimonic a grizzle is not correct.;"
]
| [
"sent13 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {C}{b};"
]
| the Ischia is a grizzle. | {A}{aa} | [
"sent11 -> int2: if the Ischia is not antimonic and is not a hydroxyzine then it is a grizzle.; sent7 -> int3: the Ischia is not antimonic and it is not a hydroxyzine if it is perfected.; sent16 -> int4: if that the linuron does not antisepticize jactitation but it does reissue A-horizon is not right it does antisepticize jactitation.; sent12 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the linuron is proteolytic and is not Timorese is false.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the linuron is not a Ascension.; sent9 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the linuron does not antisepticize jactitation but it does reissue A-horizon is incorrect.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the linuron antisepticizes jactitation.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the linuron is not wieldy but it does reissue whoop.; sent18 & int9 -> int10: the sandarac reissues whoop.; sent2 -> int11: if the fact that the sandarac does reissue Characidae and is a miscalculation does not hold then it does not reissue Characidae.; sent1 -> int12: something is not a miscalculation.; int12 & sent15 -> int13: that the sandarac reissues Characidae and it is a miscalculation is incorrect.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the sandarac does not reissue Characidae.; int10 & int14 -> int15: that the sandarac reissues whoop and does not reissue Characidae hold.; int15 -> int16: something reissues whoop but it does not reissue Characidae.; int16 & sent6 -> int17: the Ischia does perfect.; int3 & int17 -> int18: the Ischia is non-antimonic thing that is not a kind of a hydroxyzine.; int2 & int18 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 11 | 3 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the linuron is a kind of a hydroxyzine. ; $context$ = sent1: the tobogganist is not a miscalculation. sent2: something does not reissue Characidae if the fact that it reissue Characidae and it is a kind of a miscalculation is not true. sent3: that the sandarac is not an anteater and it is not aortal is not correct. sent4: the linuron is not wieldy but it reissues whoop if it antisepticizes jactitation. sent5: the fact that the linuron is both proteolytic and not Timorese is not correct if there exists something such that it is not proteolytic. sent6: if something that does reissue whoop does not reissue Characidae then the Ischia does perfect. sent7: something is not antimonic and it is not a hydroxyzine if it perfects. sent8: if the fact that the linuron is proteolytic but it is not Timorese is incorrect it is not a Ascension. sent9: if the linuron is not a Ascension that it does not antisepticize jactitation and it reissues A-horizon is incorrect. sent10: that the linuron is both not antimonic and a grizzle is not true if the sandarac is antimonic. sent11: if something is not antimonic and it is not a hydroxyzine then it is a grizzle. sent12: there exists something such that it is not proteolytic. sent13: if the fact that something is a kind of non-antimonic thing that is a grizzle is not right then it is a kind of a hydroxyzine. sent14: the tobogganist is not perfected. sent15: the fact that the sandarac does reissue Characidae and is a kind of a miscalculation is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a miscalculation. sent16: if that something does not antisepticize jactitation and reissues A-horizon is false then it antisepticize jactitation. sent17: if the fact that the collagen is a kind of non-antimonic thing that is not a Timorese is wrong the fact that it is a sore is right. sent18: if the linuron is not wieldy and reissues whoop then the sandarac reissues whoop. ; $proof$ = | sent13 -> int1: the linuron is a kind of a hydroxyzine if that it is a kind of non-antimonic a grizzle is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there are likely things does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬{B}x) | sent1: the thumbnail is not a cardinal and/or is a kind of a dacite. sent2: the thumbnail is unlikely if the tiger is unassertive. sent3: the watercress is a kind of a dacite or it does not uncloak or both. sent4: the thumbnail is not a kind of a cardinal and/or it is not a dacite. sent5: something is a mezzo-relievo and does unman Alhazen if it is not unassertive. sent6: if the thumbnail is not cardinal or not a dacite or both it is not unlikely. sent7: if something does not habituate quahog then it is unlikely and/or is unassertive. sent8: that the dock is not a dacite is not false. sent9: the blackcock does not uncloak if the thumbnail is unlikely and it is a mezzo-relievo. sent10: if the tiger is unlikely then the thumbnail is unlikely. sent11: either the quahog is not unconditional or it is not a kind of a dacite or both. sent12: the thumbnail is cardinal and/or not a dacite. sent13: the thumbnail is not a manicurist and/or it is not a kind of a rudderpost. sent14: something is not a catalufa and/or it is not a dacite if it does not uncloak. sent15: if something is a mezzo-relievo the fact that it is a kind of probable thing that does uncloak hold. sent16: there are unlikely things. sent17: something does not habituate quahog if that it does habituate quahog and it is a kind of a taro is not correct. | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) sent2: {E}{b} -> {B}{a} sent3: ({AB}{hf} v ¬{A}{hf}) sent4: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) sent6: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({B}x v {E}x) sent8: ¬{AB}{di} sent9: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{cq} sent10: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} sent11: (¬{AC}{hn} v ¬{AB}{hn}) sent12: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent13: (¬{AM}{a} v ¬{CC}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{BG}x v ¬{AB}x) sent15: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) sent16: (Ex): {B}x sent17: (x): ¬({J}x & {L}x) -> ¬{J}x | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: that the thumbnail is not unlikely is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the otologist is not cardinal. | ¬{AA}{fn} | [
"sent15 -> int2: if the thumbnail is a mezzo-relievo it is a kind of probable thing that does uncloak.; sent5 -> int3: if the thumbnail is not unassertive then it is a mezzo-relievo and it unmans Alhazen.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that there are likely things does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the thumbnail is not a cardinal and/or is a kind of a dacite. sent2: the thumbnail is unlikely if the tiger is unassertive. sent3: the watercress is a kind of a dacite or it does not uncloak or both. sent4: the thumbnail is not a kind of a cardinal and/or it is not a dacite. sent5: something is a mezzo-relievo and does unman Alhazen if it is not unassertive. sent6: if the thumbnail is not cardinal or not a dacite or both it is not unlikely. sent7: if something does not habituate quahog then it is unlikely and/or is unassertive. sent8: that the dock is not a dacite is not false. sent9: the blackcock does not uncloak if the thumbnail is unlikely and it is a mezzo-relievo. sent10: if the tiger is unlikely then the thumbnail is unlikely. sent11: either the quahog is not unconditional or it is not a kind of a dacite or both. sent12: the thumbnail is cardinal and/or not a dacite. sent13: the thumbnail is not a manicurist and/or it is not a kind of a rudderpost. sent14: something is not a catalufa and/or it is not a dacite if it does not uncloak. sent15: if something is a mezzo-relievo the fact that it is a kind of probable thing that does uncloak hold. sent16: there are unlikely things. sent17: something does not habituate quahog if that it does habituate quahog and it is a kind of a taro is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent4 -> int1: that the thumbnail is not unlikely is true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the peridot does not reissue Argyroxiphium. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: the commissionaire unmans privilege. sent2: the commissionaire does not reissue hyperactivity but it is a liverwort if the peridot is a SSA. sent3: the commissionaire is not a SSA but it does unman privilege. sent4: that something does not reissue Argyroxiphium but it unmans privilege if it is imperialistic is not wrong. sent5: if the neurasthenic does not reissue Argyroxiphium but it unmans privilege the peridot unmans privilege. sent6: the commissionaire does not reissue Argyroxiphium. sent7: the commissionaire is not a vandyke but it does habituate tiepin. sent8: if the commissionaire is not a SSA then the peridot reissues Argyroxiphium. sent9: if that something is not an understatement but it is beakless is not correct then it is imperialistic. sent10: the peridot unmans privilege. | sent1: {B}{a} sent2: {A}{b} -> (¬{DP}{a} & {DB}{a}) sent3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & {B}x) sent5: (¬{C}{c} & {B}{c}) -> {B}{b} sent6: ¬{C}{a} sent7: (¬{DK}{a} & {EO}{a}) sent8: ¬{A}{a} -> {C}{b} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) -> {D}x sent10: {B}{b} | [
"sent3 -> int1: the commissionaire is not a SSA.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the commissionaire does not reissue hyperactivity and is a liverwort. | (¬{DP}{a} & {DB}{a}) | [
"sent4 -> int2: that the neurasthenic does not reissue Argyroxiphium but it does unman privilege is right if the fact that it is not imperialistic does not hold.; sent9 -> int3: if that the neurasthenic is not an understatement but beakless is not true then it is imperialistic.;"
]
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the peridot does not reissue Argyroxiphium. ; $context$ = sent1: the commissionaire unmans privilege. sent2: the commissionaire does not reissue hyperactivity but it is a liverwort if the peridot is a SSA. sent3: the commissionaire is not a SSA but it does unman privilege. sent4: that something does not reissue Argyroxiphium but it unmans privilege if it is imperialistic is not wrong. sent5: if the neurasthenic does not reissue Argyroxiphium but it unmans privilege the peridot unmans privilege. sent6: the commissionaire does not reissue Argyroxiphium. sent7: the commissionaire is not a vandyke but it does habituate tiepin. sent8: if the commissionaire is not a SSA then the peridot reissues Argyroxiphium. sent9: if that something is not an understatement but it is beakless is not correct then it is imperialistic. sent10: the peridot unmans privilege. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: the commissionaire is not a SSA.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it is a kind of infantile a abjurer. | (Ex): ({D}x & {C}x) | sent1: that the grenadine is a kind of a boatswain hold. sent2: the fact that the inclinometer is a Stockholm is not false. sent3: if the grenadine is infantile the inclinometer is infantile. sent4: the narcissist habituates radiography and it is a kind of a sack. sent5: the inclinometer is a kind of a one-sixty-fourth and it is unhappy. sent6: there exists something such that it is a abjurer. sent7: the fact that the inclinometer is a abjurer hold if the grenadine is a abjurer. sent8: the Jacobite is a sack. sent9: the grenadine is infantile. sent10: there exists something such that it does unman Beveridge and is syndetic. sent11: there is something such that it is infantile. sent12: something is a sack and is a boatswain. sent13: the grenadine is both a backpack and nonadsorbent. sent14: the yataghan does excrete if something dissipates and it does reissue elasticity. sent15: the inclinometer is a sorbate and a demographic. sent16: there is something such that it does unman voter and is blastomeric. sent17: the pustule is a abjurer. sent18: the borough is a kind of infantile thing that is maxillomandibular. sent19: there is something such that it is a boatswain. sent20: the inclinometer is a abjurer if there exists something such that it is both a sack and a boatswain. sent21: the inclinometer is a boatswain. sent22: that something is a kind of a Service and is not non-axile hold. sent23: the grenadine is an epidural. sent24: there is something such that it sacks. | sent1: {B}{b} sent2: {BA}{a} sent3: {D}{b} -> {D}{a} sent4: ({HG}{df} & {A}{df}) sent5: ({DK}{a} & {EM}{a}) sent6: (Ex): {C}x sent7: {C}{b} -> {C}{a} sent8: {A}{eq} sent9: {D}{b} sent10: (Ex): ({AE}x & {HP}x) sent11: (Ex): {D}x sent12: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent13: ({BS}{b} & {IH}{b}) sent14: (x): ({GP}x & {AO}x) -> {AC}{ci} sent15: ({BR}{a} & {HN}{a}) sent16: (Ex): ({FO}x & {CH}x) sent17: {C}{hq} sent18: ({D}{j} & {FL}{j}) sent19: (Ex): {B}x sent20: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent21: {B}{a} sent22: (Ex): ({ES}x & {AJ}x) sent23: {DM}{b} sent24: (Ex): {A}x | [
"sent12 & sent20 -> int1: the inclinometer is a kind of a abjurer.; sent3 & sent9 -> int2: the inclinometer is infantile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inclinometer is infantile and it is a kind of a abjurer.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent12 & sent20 -> int1: {C}{a}; sent3 & sent9 -> int2: {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({D}{a} & {C}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a kind of infantile a abjurer. ; $context$ = sent1: that the grenadine is a kind of a boatswain hold. sent2: the fact that the inclinometer is a Stockholm is not false. sent3: if the grenadine is infantile the inclinometer is infantile. sent4: the narcissist habituates radiography and it is a kind of a sack. sent5: the inclinometer is a kind of a one-sixty-fourth and it is unhappy. sent6: there exists something such that it is a abjurer. sent7: the fact that the inclinometer is a abjurer hold if the grenadine is a abjurer. sent8: the Jacobite is a sack. sent9: the grenadine is infantile. sent10: there exists something such that it does unman Beveridge and is syndetic. sent11: there is something such that it is infantile. sent12: something is a sack and is a boatswain. sent13: the grenadine is both a backpack and nonadsorbent. sent14: the yataghan does excrete if something dissipates and it does reissue elasticity. sent15: the inclinometer is a sorbate and a demographic. sent16: there is something such that it does unman voter and is blastomeric. sent17: the pustule is a abjurer. sent18: the borough is a kind of infantile thing that is maxillomandibular. sent19: there is something such that it is a boatswain. sent20: the inclinometer is a abjurer if there exists something such that it is both a sack and a boatswain. sent21: the inclinometer is a boatswain. sent22: that something is a kind of a Service and is not non-axile hold. sent23: the grenadine is an epidural. sent24: there is something such that it sacks. ; $proof$ = | sent12 & sent20 -> int1: the inclinometer is a kind of a abjurer.; sent3 & sent9 -> int2: the inclinometer is infantile.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inclinometer is infantile and it is a kind of a abjurer.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is not a conciseness that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler does not hold. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: if the gramicidin is not a kind of a conciseness then it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a marseille then the fact that it is scenic and it does reissue gramicidin does not hold. sent3: if something is not a conciseness that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and is a kind of a cackler does not hold. | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{JF}x -> ¬({AR}x & {AF}x) sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the gramicidin is not a conciseness then that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| null | null | []
| null | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a conciseness that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gramicidin is not a kind of a conciseness then it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a marseille then the fact that it is scenic and it does reissue gramicidin does not hold. sent3: if something is not a conciseness that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and is a kind of a cackler does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: if the gramicidin is not a conciseness then that it does not antisepticize Asahikawa and it is a cackler does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the attendant occurs. | {B} | sent1: the fact that the floriculture does not occur but the nodularness occurs is false. sent2: that if the conjunctivalness does not occur then the attendant does not occur and the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: that not the floriculture but the nodularness happens is false if the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent4: if the habituating Geraint does not occur then the fact that the exfoliation does not occur but the unmanning Latrodectus happens is incorrect. sent5: if that not the exfoliation but the unmanning Latrodectus happens does not hold the exfoliation happens. sent6: the fact that the floriculture happens but the nodularness does not occur is not true. sent7: the fact that the decalescence does not occur but the convecting occurs is wrong if the exfoliation occurs. sent8: that the floriculture and the non-nodularness happens is not correct if the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent9: the decoupage does not occur if that the decoupage happens but the attendant does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the device does not occur and the protection does not occur is not right. sent11: the accessionalness happens. sent12: the convecting does not occur if that not the decalescence but the convecting occurs does not hold. sent13: the uptownness occurs. sent14: the attendant happens if the fact that that the floriculture does not occur and the nodularness does not occur hold is false. sent15: that the recombinant happens leads to that the habituating Geraint does not occur and the peregrination does not occur. sent16: both the recombinant and the blinking occurs if the lashing does not occur. sent17: that the decoupage occurs and the attendant does not occur is incorrect if the reissuing ophthalmoscope occurs. sent18: the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent19: that the reissuing ophthalmoscope occurs and the conjunctivalness happens is brought about by that the convecting does not occur. | sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent2: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{E} & {G}) sent5: ¬(¬{E} & {G}) -> {E} sent6: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent7: {E} -> ¬(¬{F} & {D}) sent8: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent9: ¬({HJ} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{HJ} sent10: ¬(¬{CH} & ¬{HH}) sent11: {JG} sent12: ¬(¬{F} & {D}) -> ¬{D} sent13: {FC} sent14: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent15: {J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) sent16: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) sent17: {A} -> ¬({HJ} & ¬{B}) sent18: ¬{A} sent19: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {C}) | []
| []
| the decoupage does not occur. | ¬{HJ} | []
| 14 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the attendant occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the floriculture does not occur but the nodularness occurs is false. sent2: that if the conjunctivalness does not occur then the attendant does not occur and the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: that not the floriculture but the nodularness happens is false if the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent4: if the habituating Geraint does not occur then the fact that the exfoliation does not occur but the unmanning Latrodectus happens is incorrect. sent5: if that not the exfoliation but the unmanning Latrodectus happens does not hold the exfoliation happens. sent6: the fact that the floriculture happens but the nodularness does not occur is not true. sent7: the fact that the decalescence does not occur but the convecting occurs is wrong if the exfoliation occurs. sent8: that the floriculture and the non-nodularness happens is not correct if the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent9: the decoupage does not occur if that the decoupage happens but the attendant does not occur is incorrect. sent10: that the device does not occur and the protection does not occur is not right. sent11: the accessionalness happens. sent12: the convecting does not occur if that not the decalescence but the convecting occurs does not hold. sent13: the uptownness occurs. sent14: the attendant happens if the fact that that the floriculture does not occur and the nodularness does not occur hold is false. sent15: that the recombinant happens leads to that the habituating Geraint does not occur and the peregrination does not occur. sent16: both the recombinant and the blinking occurs if the lashing does not occur. sent17: that the decoupage occurs and the attendant does not occur is incorrect if the reissuing ophthalmoscope occurs. sent18: the reissuing ophthalmoscope does not occur. sent19: that the reissuing ophthalmoscope occurs and the conjunctivalness happens is brought about by that the convecting does not occur. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the khaki is not a abortus. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of an addressed that is not a converse does not hold then it converse. sent2: if that the voodoo does not habituate voodoo but it is a C-horizon does not hold then the triangle is not a C-horizon. sent3: if something is not a kind of a C-horizon then that it is not a handcar and it does bend does not hold. sent4: the toyon is not archiepiscopal if there exists something such that that it is both not a handcar and a bending does not hold. sent5: the khaki is a abortus if the arousal is not a kind of a abortus. sent6: the frontispiece is not a abortus if there is something such that it is environmental. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is environmental and it is not yogistic is not true the khaki is not a abortus. sent8: that there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is environmental and it is yogistic is not wrong is false hold. sent9: the fact that the voodoo addresses but it does not converse does not hold if something does not addresses. sent10: if there exists something such that it is yogistic the khaki is not a abortus. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a abortus and it is not environmental does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is both environmental and not a abortus is wrong. sent13: there are environmental and non-yogistic things. sent14: there exists something such that it does not address. sent15: if the voodoo is a converse that it does not habituate voodoo and it is a C-horizon is false. sent16: that the fact that the frontispiece is environmental thing that is yogistic is incorrect is not false. | sent1: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {H}x sent2: ¬(¬{G}{e} & {F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} sent3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{c} sent5: ¬{A}{b} -> {A}{a} sent6: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{A}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent9: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({I}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) sent10: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent11: (Ex): ¬({A}x & ¬{AA}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{A}x) sent13: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬{I}x sent15: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{G}{e} & {F}{e}) sent16: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | []
| []
| the khaki is a kind of a abortus. | {A}{a} | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the triangle is not a kind of a C-horizon the fact that it is not a kind of a handcar and it is a bending is not correct.; sent1 -> int2: if that the voodoo addresses and is not a kind of a converse does not hold it converse.; sent14 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that that the voodoo does address but it does not converse is wrong is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the voodoo is a converse.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: that the voodoo does not habituate voodoo and is a C-horizon is false.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the triangle is not a C-horizon.; int1 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the triangle is not a handcar but it does bend is not true.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a handcar and it does bend is not correct.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the toyon is not archiepiscopal.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not archiepiscopal.;"
]
| 11 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the khaki is not a abortus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is a kind of an addressed that is not a converse does not hold then it converse. sent2: if that the voodoo does not habituate voodoo but it is a C-horizon does not hold then the triangle is not a C-horizon. sent3: if something is not a kind of a C-horizon then that it is not a handcar and it does bend does not hold. sent4: the toyon is not archiepiscopal if there exists something such that that it is both not a handcar and a bending does not hold. sent5: the khaki is a abortus if the arousal is not a kind of a abortus. sent6: the frontispiece is not a abortus if there is something such that it is environmental. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is environmental and it is not yogistic is not true the khaki is not a abortus. sent8: that there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is environmental and it is yogistic is not wrong is false hold. sent9: the fact that the voodoo addresses but it does not converse does not hold if something does not addresses. sent10: if there exists something such that it is yogistic the khaki is not a abortus. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a abortus and it is not environmental does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it is both environmental and not a abortus is wrong. sent13: there are environmental and non-yogistic things. sent14: there exists something such that it does not address. sent15: if the voodoo is a converse that it does not habituate voodoo and it is a C-horizon is false. sent16: that the fact that the frontispiece is environmental thing that is yogistic is incorrect is not false. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | something is dactylic and it is a tramcar. | (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) | sent1: there is something such that it is dactylic. sent2: the algebraist is concise. sent3: something is a kind of a shy. sent4: the latchkey is dactylic. sent5: the ma is a tramcar. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a ormolu and is a anorchism. sent7: the hagfish is dactylic. sent8: the algebraist is a callowness and is vacuolate. sent9: the nibble is a kind of a tramcar. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of an ophthalmoscope. sent11: the algebraist is a pudendum. sent12: the dill is a tramcar. sent13: the algebraist is hydrodynamics. sent14: that the algebraist is a kind of a tramcar is not incorrect. sent15: the algebraist is unenthusiastic. sent16: the pasang reissues codefendant and is a tramcar. sent17: something is collagenous. sent18: the Portuguese is a kind of a tramcar. sent19: that the algebraist does reissue codefendant is not incorrect. sent20: the algebraist is multilingual. sent21: something is not non-dactylic and is a tramcar if the fact that it is non-sublunar is right. | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: {U}{a} sent3: (Ex): {CQ}x sent4: {A}{hi} sent5: {B}{ac} sent6: (Ex): ({AF}x & {EG}x) sent7: {A}{hl} sent8: ({JJ}{a} & {IC}{a}) sent9: {B}{an} sent10: (Ex): {DK}x sent11: {IO}{a} sent12: {B}{ek} sent13: {DN}{a} sent14: {B}{a} sent15: {IK}{a} sent16: ({GS}{f} & {B}{f}) sent17: (Ex): {ER}x sent18: {B}{dk} sent19: {GS}{a} sent20: {HL}{a} sent21: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) | []
| []
| the larcenist is dactylic. | {A}{fk} | [
"sent21 -> int1: if the larcenist is not sublunar then it is dactylic and it is a tramcar.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something is dactylic and it is a tramcar. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is dactylic. sent2: the algebraist is concise. sent3: something is a kind of a shy. sent4: the latchkey is dactylic. sent5: the ma is a tramcar. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a ormolu and is a anorchism. sent7: the hagfish is dactylic. sent8: the algebraist is a callowness and is vacuolate. sent9: the nibble is a kind of a tramcar. sent10: there exists something such that it is a kind of an ophthalmoscope. sent11: the algebraist is a pudendum. sent12: the dill is a tramcar. sent13: the algebraist is hydrodynamics. sent14: that the algebraist is a kind of a tramcar is not incorrect. sent15: the algebraist is unenthusiastic. sent16: the pasang reissues codefendant and is a tramcar. sent17: something is collagenous. sent18: the Portuguese is a kind of a tramcar. sent19: that the algebraist does reissue codefendant is not incorrect. sent20: the algebraist is multilingual. sent21: something is not non-dactylic and is a tramcar if the fact that it is non-sublunar is right. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the Englishman does not unman smothering is not wrong. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: if the tree-frog is not a kind of a precipice then the tenderfoot does not habituate Anthidium. sent2: the tenderfoot is a kind of a case that is not a kind of a wakefulness if the tree-frog is diagonalizable. sent3: the source is not a fishpond and is not naval. sent4: if the source cases the finish unmans smothering. sent5: the tree-frog is not a precipice. sent6: something is marital and it reissues algin if it is not spectral. sent7: the source is a kind of a case that is a wakefulness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-diagonalizable is not false. sent8: the Englishman is a kind of a wakefulness if the source is a mastering and not microsomal. sent9: if something does not habituate Anthidium then the fact that the Englishman habituate Anthidium and it does antisepticize foxglove is wrong. sent10: if that the source is not a mastering and it is not microsomal is not false then the Englishman is a wakefulness. sent11: if something is marital it is diagonalizable. sent12: the Englishman is a case. sent13: if the source does not unman smothering then the Englishman does unman smothering. sent14: if the fact that the Englishman does habituate Anthidium and antisepticizes foxglove does not hold then it is not spectral. sent15: if the source is not a mastering and is microsomal the Englishman is a wakefulness. sent16: the Englishman does not unman smothering if it is a case and a wakefulness. sent17: the scapula is not a kind of a wakefulness and it is not choleraic. | sent1: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬{I}{c} sent2: {D}{d} -> ({A}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) sent3: (¬{IA}{a} & ¬{GM}{a}) sent4: {A}{a} -> {C}{hh} sent5: ¬{J}{d} sent6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) sent7: (x): {D}x -> ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent8: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent9: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({I}{b} & {H}{b}) sent10: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent11: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent12: {A}{b} sent13: ¬{C}{a} -> {C}{b} sent14: ¬({I}{b} & {H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} sent15: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent16: ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent17: (¬{B}{ii} & ¬{IR}{ii}) | []
| []
| the finish unmans smothering. | {C}{hh} | [
"sent11 -> int1: the Englishman is diagonalizable if it is marital.; sent6 -> int2: if the Englishman is not spectral it is marital and does reissue algin.; sent1 & sent5 -> int3: the tenderfoot does not habituate Anthidium.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not habituate Anthidium is not false.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the Englishman habituates Anthidium and it antisepticizes foxglove is incorrect.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: that the Englishman is not spectral is not wrong.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the Englishman is marital thing that does reissue algin.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the Englishman is marital is right.; int1 & int8 -> int9: the Englishman is diagonalizable.; int9 -> int10: there are diagonalizable things.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: the source is a case and it is a kind of a wakefulness.; int11 -> int12: the source does case.; sent4 & int12 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 11 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that the Englishman does not unman smothering is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tree-frog is not a kind of a precipice then the tenderfoot does not habituate Anthidium. sent2: the tenderfoot is a kind of a case that is not a kind of a wakefulness if the tree-frog is diagonalizable. sent3: the source is not a fishpond and is not naval. sent4: if the source cases the finish unmans smothering. sent5: the tree-frog is not a precipice. sent6: something is marital and it reissues algin if it is not spectral. sent7: the source is a kind of a case that is a wakefulness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-diagonalizable is not false. sent8: the Englishman is a kind of a wakefulness if the source is a mastering and not microsomal. sent9: if something does not habituate Anthidium then the fact that the Englishman habituate Anthidium and it does antisepticize foxglove is wrong. sent10: if that the source is not a mastering and it is not microsomal is not false then the Englishman is a wakefulness. sent11: if something is marital it is diagonalizable. sent12: the Englishman is a case. sent13: if the source does not unman smothering then the Englishman does unman smothering. sent14: if the fact that the Englishman does habituate Anthidium and antisepticizes foxglove does not hold then it is not spectral. sent15: if the source is not a mastering and is microsomal the Englishman is a wakefulness. sent16: the Englishman does not unman smothering if it is a case and a wakefulness. sent17: the scapula is not a kind of a wakefulness and it is not choleraic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the unmanning Dewar does not occur is right. | ¬{C} | sent1: that the twin does not occur brings about that the habituating cran and the addictiveness happens. sent2: if the fact that the denudation does not occur is not incorrect then the one-step does not occur and the symbolization occurs. sent3: the reissuing lobotomy happens. sent4: the Miss occurs. sent5: that the unmanning Dewar does not occur is prevented by that the habituating concentrated happens. sent6: the palpableness happens and the spam occurs. sent7: the toppling happens and the unmanning Gongorist occurs. sent8: the unmanning pot occurs and the reissuing twinge happens. sent9: if the fact that not the habituating concentrated but the disobedientness occurs does not hold the devolution occurs. sent10: the habituating concentrated and the disobedientness occurs. sent11: if the irradiation does not occur then that that the electricalness occurs and the disobedientness happens does not hold is not false. sent12: the unmanning Dewar does not occur and the habituating concentrated happens if the disobedientness does not occur. sent13: the reissuing doge happens if the Ambrosianness occurs. sent14: if the irradiation does not occur that the fact that both the non-electricalness and the disobedientness occurs is correct is not true. sent15: that the disobedientness does not occur is true if the fact that the electricalness does not occur but the disobedientness occurs is not true. sent16: the fact that the habituating motet does not occur and the earthiness does not occur is not true if the dipterousness occurs. sent17: the reissuing cool occurs. sent18: if the fact that that the habituating motet does not occur and the earthiness does not occur is right is incorrect the twin does not occur. sent19: the disobedientness occurs. sent20: the avoidance occurs. sent21: the irradiation does not occur and the cryocautery does not occur if the addictiveness happens. sent22: if the one-step does not occur then the venesection and the dipterousness happens. | sent1: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) sent2: ¬{P} -> (¬{N} & {O}) sent3: {BR} sent4: {FT} sent5: {A} -> {C} sent6: ({GK} & {DA}) sent7: ({HA} & {JA}) sent8: ({IU} & {EJ}) sent9: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> {HM} sent10: ({A} & {B}) sent11: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & {B}) sent12: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & {A}) sent13: {AI} -> {FL} sent14: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {B}) sent15: ¬(¬{D} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent16: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) sent17: {BT} sent18: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} sent19: {B} sent20: {IO} sent21: {G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent22: ¬{N} -> ({M} & {L}) | [
"sent10 -> int1: the habituating concentrated occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent10 -> int1: {A}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the unmanning Dewar does not occur. | ¬{C} | []
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the unmanning Dewar does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the twin does not occur brings about that the habituating cran and the addictiveness happens. sent2: if the fact that the denudation does not occur is not incorrect then the one-step does not occur and the symbolization occurs. sent3: the reissuing lobotomy happens. sent4: the Miss occurs. sent5: that the unmanning Dewar does not occur is prevented by that the habituating concentrated happens. sent6: the palpableness happens and the spam occurs. sent7: the toppling happens and the unmanning Gongorist occurs. sent8: the unmanning pot occurs and the reissuing twinge happens. sent9: if the fact that not the habituating concentrated but the disobedientness occurs does not hold the devolution occurs. sent10: the habituating concentrated and the disobedientness occurs. sent11: if the irradiation does not occur then that that the electricalness occurs and the disobedientness happens does not hold is not false. sent12: the unmanning Dewar does not occur and the habituating concentrated happens if the disobedientness does not occur. sent13: the reissuing doge happens if the Ambrosianness occurs. sent14: if the irradiation does not occur that the fact that both the non-electricalness and the disobedientness occurs is correct is not true. sent15: that the disobedientness does not occur is true if the fact that the electricalness does not occur but the disobedientness occurs is not true. sent16: the fact that the habituating motet does not occur and the earthiness does not occur is not true if the dipterousness occurs. sent17: the reissuing cool occurs. sent18: if the fact that that the habituating motet does not occur and the earthiness does not occur is right is incorrect the twin does not occur. sent19: the disobedientness occurs. sent20: the avoidance occurs. sent21: the irradiation does not occur and the cryocautery does not occur if the addictiveness happens. sent22: if the one-step does not occur then the venesection and the dipterousness happens. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: the habituating concentrated occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the unmanning beachwear happens. | {A} | sent1: if the fact that the habituating Friday or the bust-up or both occurs is false the reissuing airdock does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the reissuing airdock does not occur is not false then the fact that the strangeness happens and the unmanning beachwear happens does not hold. sent3: that the strangeness happens is not false if the unmanning beachwear occurs. sent4: the strangeness and the unmanning beachwear occurs if the reissuing airdock does not occur. sent5: the revival does not occur if the fact that the strangeness and the unmanning beachwear occurs is not right. sent6: that the strangeness does not occur but the reissuing airdock happens is right. sent7: the pacification does not occur if that the universalisticness does not occur and the unmanning nebule happens is incorrect. sent8: if the pacification does not occur that either the habituating Friday occurs or the bust-up happens or both does not hold. sent9: the reissuing airdock happens. sent10: the fact that the reissuing airdock does not occur is correct if that the habituating Friday occurs and the bust-up happens is not correct. sent11: the fact that the selection does not occur is right. | sent1: ¬({D} v {E}) -> ¬{C} sent2: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & {A}) sent3: {A} -> {B} sent4: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) sent5: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{IH} sent6: (¬{B} & {C}) sent7: ¬(¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} sent8: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} v {E}) sent9: {C} sent10: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent11: ¬{L} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unmanning beachwear happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the strangeness happens.; sent6 -> int2: the strangeness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent6 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the unmanning beachwear happens. | {A} | []
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the unmanning beachwear happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the habituating Friday or the bust-up or both occurs is false the reissuing airdock does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the reissuing airdock does not occur is not false then the fact that the strangeness happens and the unmanning beachwear happens does not hold. sent3: that the strangeness happens is not false if the unmanning beachwear occurs. sent4: the strangeness and the unmanning beachwear occurs if the reissuing airdock does not occur. sent5: the revival does not occur if the fact that the strangeness and the unmanning beachwear occurs is not right. sent6: that the strangeness does not occur but the reissuing airdock happens is right. sent7: the pacification does not occur if that the universalisticness does not occur and the unmanning nebule happens is incorrect. sent8: if the pacification does not occur that either the habituating Friday occurs or the bust-up happens or both does not hold. sent9: the reissuing airdock happens. sent10: the fact that the reissuing airdock does not occur is correct if that the habituating Friday occurs and the bust-up happens is not correct. sent11: the fact that the selection does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unmanning beachwear happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the strangeness happens.; sent6 -> int2: the strangeness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the coagulase is not nonmagnetic. | ¬{C}{aa} | sent1: something is not nonmagnetic if it decimates. sent2: the Guyanese is nasopharyngeal if it is artful. sent3: the pawl is not nonmagnetic. sent4: if the Jacobite is a inessential then the coagulase is not a kind of an act. sent5: the coagulase decimates and/or is a kind of an act. sent6: the coagulase either is extrasensory or is a scoffer or both. sent7: if something does decimate that it is not magnetic is not incorrect. sent8: if the coagulase is an act it is not nonmagnetic. sent9: if the fact that the coagulase is nonmagnetic is correct then it is not calendric. sent10: if the coagulase does decimate then it is nonmagnetic. | sent1: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: {BB}{fh} -> {CT}{fh} sent3: ¬{C}{dc} sent4: {D}{a} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa}) sent6: ({FR}{aa} v {HT}{aa}) sent7: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent8: {B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent9: {C}{aa} -> ¬{FC}{aa} sent10: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the coagulase decimates that it is not nonmagnetic is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent1 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; int1 & sent5 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the coagulase is nonmagnetic. | {C}{aa} | []
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the coagulase is not nonmagnetic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not nonmagnetic if it decimates. sent2: the Guyanese is nasopharyngeal if it is artful. sent3: the pawl is not nonmagnetic. sent4: if the Jacobite is a inessential then the coagulase is not a kind of an act. sent5: the coagulase decimates and/or is a kind of an act. sent6: the coagulase either is extrasensory or is a scoffer or both. sent7: if something does decimate that it is not magnetic is not incorrect. sent8: if the coagulase is an act it is not nonmagnetic. sent9: if the fact that the coagulase is nonmagnetic is correct then it is not calendric. sent10: if the coagulase does decimate then it is nonmagnetic. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: if the coagulase decimates that it is not nonmagnetic is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the moneymaker is not nonsectarian. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: the milkwagon is a Streptosolen and it is resinlike. sent2: the moneymaker is not arbitrary. sent3: the Quapaw is not nonsectarian. sent4: the moneymaker is not a quoits. sent5: if the holmium is nonsectarian the moneymaker is nonsectarian. sent6: the balance is not a quoits. sent7: the broadbill is sectarian. sent8: the plaice is not a district but it is an annoyance if there is something such that it is immunocompetent. sent9: if that the moneymaker is a quoits is not false the single-leaf is not a kind of a skinned. sent10: if the moneymaker is not anorectal but it is Alpine then it is not a quoits. sent11: the milkwagon is immunocompetent if it is a Streptosolen. sent12: the moneymaker skins. sent13: if the moneymaker is not a quoits and does skin it is not nonsectarian. sent14: if that the holmium is not a kind of a quoits and/or it does not habituate radiobiology is not right the fact that the moneymaker is a quoits is not incorrect. sent15: the mortgagee is not nonsectarian. sent16: the moneymaker is not a quoits if it does not habituate radiobiology and it is nonrepetitive. | sent1: ({H}{d} & {I}{d}) sent2: ¬{CR}{a} sent3: ¬{C}{jc} sent4: ¬{A}{a} sent5: {C}{b} -> {C}{a} sent6: ¬{A}{gg} sent7: ¬{C}{r} sent8: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) sent9: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{al} sent10: (¬{IO}{a} & {JJ}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent11: {H}{d} -> {G}{d} sent12: {B}{a} sent13: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent14: ¬(¬{A}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) -> {A}{a} sent15: ¬{C}{gu} sent16: (¬{D}{a} & {FA}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the moneymaker is not a quoits but a skinned.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the moneymaker is nonsectarian. | {C}{a} | []
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the moneymaker is not nonsectarian. ; $context$ = sent1: the milkwagon is a Streptosolen and it is resinlike. sent2: the moneymaker is not arbitrary. sent3: the Quapaw is not nonsectarian. sent4: the moneymaker is not a quoits. sent5: if the holmium is nonsectarian the moneymaker is nonsectarian. sent6: the balance is not a quoits. sent7: the broadbill is sectarian. sent8: the plaice is not a district but it is an annoyance if there is something such that it is immunocompetent. sent9: if that the moneymaker is a quoits is not false the single-leaf is not a kind of a skinned. sent10: if the moneymaker is not anorectal but it is Alpine then it is not a quoits. sent11: the milkwagon is immunocompetent if it is a Streptosolen. sent12: the moneymaker skins. sent13: if the moneymaker is not a quoits and does skin it is not nonsectarian. sent14: if that the holmium is not a kind of a quoits and/or it does not habituate radiobiology is not right the fact that the moneymaker is a quoits is not incorrect. sent15: the mortgagee is not nonsectarian. sent16: the moneymaker is not a quoits if it does not habituate radiobiology and it is nonrepetitive. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the moneymaker is not a quoits but a skinned.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the nalorphine is a kind of a peak and intersects does not hold. | ¬({C}{a} & {D}{a}) | sent1: the fact that the bathhouse does equivocate and it does unman Grainger is not correct if it is not pyretic. sent2: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Genoese and it does not unman Grainger hold is false if it is non-basal. sent3: the nalorphine does not unman Grainger. sent4: if that the starer is basal and is a stuffiness is not correct the nalorphine is not basal. sent5: if the fact that the nalorphine does not unman Grainger is not wrong it is not Genoese. sent6: that something is a kind of a mold and it is no-go is incorrect if it does not joke. sent7: the Weld does profile and it is a classical if it is not a cymbalist. sent8: that the fact that the nickel is not a kind of a stuffiness but it is not nonclassical is not wrong is not correct if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cymbalist. sent9: the kestrel is not a peak. sent10: the nalorphine does not act. sent11: the fact that the nalorphine does automobile and habituates liveryman is false. sent12: the liveryman does not intersect. sent13: something is not a kind of a profiling and is basal if it is not a classical. sent14: there exists something such that it is a cymbalist. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it unmans Grainger and is not a kind of a peak is wrong then the nalorphine does peak. sent16: if the starer is not a profiling then the fact that it unmans Grainger and it does not peak is wrong. sent17: if the nalorphine is not pyrotechnic it does not unman Grainger. sent18: something is a peak if that it is non-Genoese thing that does not unman Grainger is not correct. sent19: if the Weld is a kind of a Genoese then that the nalorphine does intersect is right. sent20: the fact that something peaks and intersects is not true if it is not Genoese. sent21: The Grainger does not unman nalorphine. sent22: the nalorphine does intersect if the Weld is a profiling. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a stuffiness and it is a classical hold is not right the starer is not a kind of a classical. | sent1: ¬{AJ}{br} -> ¬({GC}{br} & {A}{br}) sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬({F}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{DD}x -> ¬({IO}x & {DF}x) sent7: ¬{I}{b} -> ({E}{b} & {G}{b}) sent8: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent9: ¬{C}{ip} sent10: ¬{DO}{a} sent11: ¬({GS}{a} & {FT}{a}) sent12: ¬{D}{du} sent13: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) sent14: (Ex): {I}x sent15: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {C}{a} sent16: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬({A}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent17: ¬{CU}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {C}x sent19: {B}{b} -> {D}{a} sent20: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {D}x) sent21: ¬{AA}{aa} sent22: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} sent23: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}{c} | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the nalorphine is not Genoese.; sent20 -> int2: the fact that the nalorphine is a peak and does intersect is incorrect if the fact that it is not a Genoese is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent20 -> int2: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({C}{a} & {D}{a}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| the nalorphine is a peak and it does intersect. | ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) | [
"sent18 -> int3: if the fact that the nalorphine is not Genoese and does not unman Grainger is not correct then it is a peak.; sent2 -> int4: that the nalorphine is not a kind of a Genoese and it does not unman Grainger is false if it is not basal.;"
]
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the nalorphine is a kind of a peak and intersects does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bathhouse does equivocate and it does unman Grainger is not correct if it is not pyretic. sent2: that the fact that something is not a kind of a Genoese and it does not unman Grainger hold is false if it is non-basal. sent3: the nalorphine does not unman Grainger. sent4: if that the starer is basal and is a stuffiness is not correct the nalorphine is not basal. sent5: if the fact that the nalorphine does not unman Grainger is not wrong it is not Genoese. sent6: that something is a kind of a mold and it is no-go is incorrect if it does not joke. sent7: the Weld does profile and it is a classical if it is not a cymbalist. sent8: that the fact that the nickel is not a kind of a stuffiness but it is not nonclassical is not wrong is not correct if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cymbalist. sent9: the kestrel is not a peak. sent10: the nalorphine does not act. sent11: the fact that the nalorphine does automobile and habituates liveryman is false. sent12: the liveryman does not intersect. sent13: something is not a kind of a profiling and is basal if it is not a classical. sent14: there exists something such that it is a cymbalist. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it unmans Grainger and is not a kind of a peak is wrong then the nalorphine does peak. sent16: if the starer is not a profiling then the fact that it unmans Grainger and it does not peak is wrong. sent17: if the nalorphine is not pyrotechnic it does not unman Grainger. sent18: something is a peak if that it is non-Genoese thing that does not unman Grainger is not correct. sent19: if the Weld is a kind of a Genoese then that the nalorphine does intersect is right. sent20: the fact that something peaks and intersects is not true if it is not Genoese. sent21: The Grainger does not unman nalorphine. sent22: the nalorphine does intersect if the Weld is a profiling. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a stuffiness and it is a classical hold is not right the starer is not a kind of a classical. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the nalorphine is not Genoese.; sent20 -> int2: the fact that the nalorphine is a peak and does intersect is incorrect if the fact that it is not a Genoese is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it is not nonarbitrable then the fact that it is non-achondritic and it is not a Bataan is false is not true. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: there is something such that if it is not nonarbitrable the fact that it is achondritic and it is not a Bataan does not hold. sent2: the fact that the fact that the retrovirus is not achondritic and not a Bataan is incorrect is not incorrect if that it is not nonarbitrable is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a raptor the fact that it is not non-tasteless and is not a dazzle is wrong. sent4: the fact that something does not habituate Cassandra and it is not a kind of a note is incorrect if that it is not Parthian is right. sent5: there is something such that if it does reissue bed-ground that it does not unman mordant and is not presocratic does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does antisepticize cupbearer hold then the fact that it is non-tuneful thing that is not a kind of a tetroxide is not right. sent7: if the bed-ground does not unman palatine then it does not schematize and is not coital. sent8: if the cupbearer is not a depository that it does not reissue squeal and it is not a Bataan is not true. sent9: if the retrovirus is not nonarbitrable it is both not achondritic and not a Bataan. sent10: the fact that that the retrovirus is non-achondritic and it is not a Bataan is wrong hold if it is nonarbitrable. sent11: that something is not hemic and it does not reissue bed-ground is false if it is not a bastille. | sent1: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (Ex): ¬{HD}x -> ¬({GG}x & ¬{GT}x) sent4: (x): ¬{GK}x -> ¬(¬{JB}x & ¬{DN}x) sent5: (Ex): {C}x -> ¬(¬{DT}x & ¬{AJ}x) sent6: (Ex): {CJ}x -> ¬(¬{EC}x & ¬{CP}x) sent7: ¬{Q}{cp} -> (¬{CB}{cp} & ¬{J}{cp}) sent8: ¬{AC}{du} -> ¬(¬{EG}{du} & ¬{AB}{du}) sent9: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent11: (x): ¬{BD}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{C}x) | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
]
| there is something such that if it is not Parthian then that it does not habituate Cassandra and it is not a note does not hold. | (Ex): ¬{GK}x -> ¬(¬{JB}x & ¬{DN}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the fact that the creator does not habituate Cassandra and it does not note is false if that it is not Parthian is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
]
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not nonarbitrable then the fact that it is non-achondritic and it is not a Bataan is false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not nonarbitrable the fact that it is achondritic and it is not a Bataan does not hold. sent2: the fact that the fact that the retrovirus is not achondritic and not a Bataan is incorrect is not incorrect if that it is not nonarbitrable is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a raptor the fact that it is not non-tasteless and is not a dazzle is wrong. sent4: the fact that something does not habituate Cassandra and it is not a kind of a note is incorrect if that it is not Parthian is right. sent5: there is something such that if it does reissue bed-ground that it does not unman mordant and is not presocratic does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it does antisepticize cupbearer hold then the fact that it is non-tuneful thing that is not a kind of a tetroxide is not right. sent7: if the bed-ground does not unman palatine then it does not schematize and is not coital. sent8: if the cupbearer is not a depository that it does not reissue squeal and it is not a Bataan is not true. sent9: if the retrovirus is not nonarbitrable it is both not achondritic and not a Bataan. sent10: the fact that that the retrovirus is non-achondritic and it is not a Bataan is wrong hold if it is nonarbitrable. sent11: that something is not hemic and it does not reissue bed-ground is false if it is not a bastille. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.