text
stringlengths
1
411
label
int64
0
1
idx
int64
0
1.77k
my only complaint ( really more of an observation ) is that the outside finish of the ipod is rather delicate , so i am going to get a case for mine so it doesn 't get all scratched up .
0
200
if there were any complaints i have , they are marginal , but one is apples ' proprietary set-up for music files , their incompatibility with other music services ( i . e . napster ) is down right wrong .
0
201
also , some other mp3 players such as the nitrus allow you to play wma ( windows media audio ) files , whereas the ipod does not .
0
202
as with most headphones that come with any type of music player , i recommend throwing these into the nearest river , unless you like having hard , round pieces of plastic in your ears .
0
203
because steve jobs is a twisted individual and he made sure that he ruined this device by giving it an unrepeatable 18 month battery .
0
204
this was obviously a conspiracy as it is freak in ' easy to manufacture a device with replaceable batteries ! . ! .
0
205
however , in my mind , $299 is a lot to pay for a device that will only last 18 months .
0
206
looks and durability : i realize many people are fond of the minimalist white interface .
0
207
the biggest red flag for me was the fact that although my cousin 's player was relatively new , it was riddled with scratches .
0
208
battery : compared to the other players on the market , the ipod has one of the worst batteries around .
0
209
maybe this new design is more durable than the last , but i kind of doubt it .
0
210
we can start by losing the shiny miracle-material cover that you can literally scratch just by looking at it wrong , and thus eliminate the need for third-party " asking " protective covers for an extra thirty bucks .
0
211
first of all , i 've never been big on earbuds - they 're just not that comfortable .
0
212
and if you 're a mac user like me , they 've naturally made sure you have no viable alternative .
0
213
however , the battery life isn 't as good as i would like .
0
214
cons breaks easily .
0
215
hard drive screws up occasionally
0
216
this is only a problem at night , during the day the screen is very easy to see .
0
217
the only problem is the battery life .
0
218
apple 's ipod battery replacement service costs $100 ! .
0
219
i have read the installation instructions for both nis 2004 and navy 2004 prior to installation , but still ended up with the same result . . . junk software .
0
220
but if i installed either one of these norton products , neither works after installation ? .
0
221
i have used norton for the past 5 years and for the last 2 years , the software has gotten more and more disgraceful .
0
222
i am glad that i do not work for norton .
0
223
after 4 attempted installs , i have finally given up .
0
224
during install , nis would either freeze or not reboot properly when asked to do so .
0
225
the ms scandisk would appear due to manual shutdown and would only scan to the 2nd bar , over and over ( up to 1 hr , i then shut it down and used go back ) .
0
226
i have never had this problem with any other software on my computer .
0
227
being a past norton customer , i consider this to be a slap to my face .
0
228
buying software that can not be installed normally and being put into the position of having a non-working computer .
0
229
norton has been on a downhill slid recently with their products , but with this one , they have fallen off the cliff .
0
230
as a loyal customer of norton/symantec products , i purchased internet security 2004 as a software firewall and could not be any more dissatisfied with the product ( and hence the one star rating ) .
0
231
yeah - this program protects your computer all right - by locking you off the internet .
0
232
other than that it is all the same except the new updates .
0
233
so far i haven 't had so much complaints except that i still haven 't mastered how to scandisk when using internet security .
0
234
too bad the product is cumbersome and intertwined trying to do so much at one time .
0
235
sometimes a suite is not a good deal and all you get is a bundle of headaches .
0
236
norton internet security 2004 is one of the more buggy implementations .
0
237
this product has virtually all the same installation problems .
0
238
for purposes of clarity , here is my review from that product , edited to be appropriate for this product , since , for the most part , they share many of the same problems .
0
239
this version of internet security 2004 , is beyond hope .
0
240
they are a royal pain to install , and don 't function properly once finally installed -- if you can install them at all .
0
241
the biggest problem is the installation .
0
242
also if you do manage to get it installed , any problems with liveupdate or with system works will also affect the functionality and/or the process of updating internet security .
0
243
i 've had to install and uninstall them four or five times so far , and i 've not to get either product working properly .
0
244
first , it serious , serious installation problems .
0
245
back in may 2004 , when i first reviewed this , it had taken me over 16 hours to install and run .
0
246
almost from the beginning , liveupdate would not function .
0
247
first , it failed whenever connecting to get updates .
0
248
when i finally got it working , it only worked properly for many a month .
0
249
the next problem was that it didn 't recognize all the installed components , so it would not update them , most notably and importantly , virus definitions .
0
250
but this doesn 't make up for it 's innumerable other short-comings , the biggest of which is the inability to download any updates due to problems with liveupdate .
0
251
the other annoyance with this that you have to remove every single remnant of previous version of norton systemworks before you installs this .
0
252
warning ! . the windows " remove program " feature does not do a good job of this , and neither does norton 's own removal program .
0
253
a lot of " fragments " were left in the registry , and it the norton system folders .
0
254
if you have an older version of " internet security " installed , you may also need to remove it as well before proceeding with systemworks install .
0
255
you also need to go in and manually remove many symantec files from the registry .
0
256
as of october , 2004 , these products are not working and i 'm ready to demand a refund from symantec .
0
257
i just uninstalled systemworks and internet security for at least the fifth time due to functionality issues .
0
258
once again it won 't reinstall , even with online and email assistance from symantect technicians .
0
259
the best thing to do with this version , is to leave it on the store shelf . it doesn 't work , and will cost you an enormous amount of your time , not to mention your hard earned dollars .
0
260
personally , i may never buy symantect products again .
0
261
avoid this product at all costs .
0
262
there are some highs to the 2004 edition , but mostly lows .
0
263
the program brings more problems than a virus , albeit not as major problems , just not what you expect for 70 bucks .
0
264
i had a question about the pros and cons of turning off the norton firewall vs . the windows firewall , and waited 45 minutes to speak with a tech support representative because i did not have a " customer priority id number . "
0
265
then when i went to norton 's website to obtain a priority id number per the instructions i had been given , i couldn 't find a way to get one .
0
266
so i e-mailed the online tech support with that simple question , and got a reply which was totally unresponsive ( it looked as though they didn 't actually read the e-mail and just sent back a few boilerplate paragraphs ) .
0
267
and , when you think about it , it 's insulting that norton requires its customers to jump through these hoops -- anyone who can provide proof of purchase , whether on the phone or online ( what if your computer is down ? . ) , should have equal priority .
0
268
stay away from this product ! .
0
269
i don 't know what 's happened to norton , but 2004 is absolute garbage .
0
270
the customer support is pathetic .
0
271
i have found too many bugs in norton internet security professional to recommend it to any one without extreme patience and experience .
0
272
this product is absolutely not ready for release .
0
273
it is buggy , slow and basically frustrates the heck out of the user .
0
274
i am an it professional and have used norton for years , but this product is a complete and utter dud .
0
275
it 's a rip off if one buys norton internet security and antivirus .
0
276
nothing spectacular is done by internet security or by antivirus software .
0
277
even though i have the parental controls off it constantly starts updating them then freezes my computer .
0
278
now in october , 2004 , the firewall said i couldn 't ok anymore software to use the internet because its full .
0
279
im at full capacity ! . ! . ! . ! . i called syman tic and they said they don 't know why but i should get tech 's support at $35/hr to help ! . ! . i did call them and was on hold for 55 minutes until i hung up ! .
0
280
so , don 't buy this or upgrade .
0
281
if you currently own the 2003 version , and are looking to upgrade to the 2004 version , don 't .
0
282
there is little meaningful difference between the two versions aside from the tedious activation process , and the product is currently rather buggy and has problems running unless cleanly installed on a formatted drive .
0
283
if you are new to the market and looking to buy a symantec software product , save yourself some money and buy the 2003 version .
0
284
from day one , we 've had hangups , crashes , glitches , continual reboots , long shutdowns due to " cc app . exe " program running which is a norton program .
0
285
long reboots due to norton taking forever to boot .
0
286
we constantly got " windows virtual memory low " error messages popping up foll wed by ridiculous slowdowns and/or crashes .
0
287
norton online support does not even acknowledge this problem nor does the computer company that preloaded it on our new computer .
0
288
norton support is completely pathetic .
0
289
do not buy any home version of norton anything .
0
290
our norton internet/av 2004 was terrible right from the get go , so i 'd think that if steelworks is ok now , it should remain ok .
0
291
just the home version of norton internet/av has too many glitches and problems to even remotely bother with .
0
292
i am an advanced computer user , so i can not even imagine how a new or novice user would ever get this terrible program to work ! .
0
293
seems the " program scan " feature did not find the exe file for outlook ! .
0
294
like most of their solutions ( which first blame other applications for errors ) , the tech persons line was that this was probably a microsoft error - it was not .
0
295
it was a symantec error .
0
296
after a recent update , i can no longer open more then 1 browser window .
0
297
i 've searched the program and their online tech support ( worthless ) and have found no solutions .
0
298
this is definitely one of those products , especially as the company is leaning more towards making a profit .
0
299