text
stringlengths 2
1.7M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Please see message from Kerry Stroup below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 04/18/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------
Kerry Stroup
04/18/2000 11:44 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Becky L
Merola/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Ohio regulations regarding certification, market monitoring, ADR,
and electric service standards
The Ohio Commission has recently adopted several sets of administrative rules
required by the state's electric restructuring law. Rules have been issued
specifiying certification requirements and procedures, reporting requirements
for the Commission's monitoring of the retail marketplace, alternative
dispute resolution, non-competitive electric service standards, and
competitive retail electric service standards. A document follows,
summarizing some of the major highlights of the adopted rules. As
promulgated, the rules regarding certification and market monitoring are not
overly burdensome. The competitive electric service standards are a mixed
bag, e.g. imposing significant duties regarding contract disclosure and term,
while providing for telephonic and Internet enrollment.
Please direct any questions regarding the rules to me. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
So if we buy the property before the LLC is owned by ENext the entire project
goes on the balance sheet since we will be committed to building a road and
stormwater system. There we all must be aware that we can not close on the
property until the LLC is owned by ENext. Do you agree?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Put the land on the balance sheet is a forgiveable sin. Incurring any other
type of hard costs puts the entire project (whatever that may be) on the
balance sheet.
Kay
From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 03:53 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
If we buy the property before the LLC is owned by ENext, wouldn't the big
concern be that we've put $1.8 million of land plus an additional $900,000 or
so of obligations to build road and stormwater system on the balance rather
than the rather small ongoing costs related to maintainance of the road and
system?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:46 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
As I understand it, if the option is exercised (and the property bought)
prior to the time the LLC is owned by ENext, there is a balance sheet
impact.
From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 03:01 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Probable time for them to bless the agreements; however, since these
documents will not be executed until after closing, the obligations created
under the Property Owners Association should not have a balance sheet impact.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Krause, Greg; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Greg and Ben,
So is it about time to get Lisa, Herman and Rose involved in the PAD stuff?
Kay
From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 12:07 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Kay,
A&K did the title committment work and is now working on the Property
Association Documents (as is Greenberg Traurig in West Palm Beach). Ann
Elizabeth's
last email message to me before she went on vacation was that A&K was the
designated hitter for the Midway Project. You have been copied on those
docs which we desparately need to get to Cooney Midway Groves, the property
owner. As far as I know, they have not been involved in anything else
related to Midway this year.
Christi left me a message saying that Lloyd Will or one of his guys needs to
review the Interconnction Agreement. I do not know Lloyd.
Greg
PS we had a good meeting with DERM on the landfill closure issues in the
Certosa Holdings deal. I'll try to reach you this afternoon to discuss.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
How much involvement has A & K had on Midway? I have other counsel engaged
for the sale, but this falls into a different category.
Kay
From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 11:35 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Please see attachment below with Christi's comments.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Krause, Greg; Nicolay, Christi
Subject: Midway Interconnect Agreement
Kay:
Greg has Christi's comments on the FPL Construction & Connection Agreement,
and he will be sending us those comments today in a marked document. Have we
engaged outside counsel to review this agreement? I'd like to have a
commercial / legal review fully completed, and then get accounting / finance
to comment. I this something you were planning to have Carlos to work on
given his recent work on ComEd and Ameren?
Please let me know. Thanks.
Attached is the original generic form of FPL Connection and Construction
Agreement for your reference.
Ben
<< File: FPL Construction Connection Agreement Generic.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The attached has Louise's comments to Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
-----Original Message-----
From: Koehler, Anne C.
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:16 AM
To: '[email protected]@ENRON'
Cc: Schuler, Lance (Legal); Detmering, Tim; Piper, Greg; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Kitchen, Louise; Webb, Jay
Subject: RE: Revised Draft of the Assignment and License Agreement
A couple of comments on the revised form of Assignment and License
1. This appears to allow the Estate to use the Software (including the EnronOnline Software) and the processes and services covered by the patents for trading gas and power within North America. Is this the new deal? For the template and the Wind deal? Also, does 3.1 (b) allow Enron to sell the processes covered by the patents without any restriction on field of use?
2. Are we now going to give Enron the right to sublicense and distribute Source Code? I thought we were going to limit it to Object Code.
3. In Section 3.1 do we need to define affiliates?
4. Are the restrictions on Asssignment and Licensing in Section 4.4 supposed cover all the Software, including the mid and back office functions, or only the EOL Software?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:18 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Schuler, Lance (Legal); Daniels, Eddy; Koehler, Anne C.; Hansen, Leslie; Piper, Greg; Detmering, Tim
Subject: Revised Draft of the Assignment and License Agreement
Here is the revised draft reflecting comments from Enron management team
and Enron legal team (Houston).
For some reason, I am unable to run Comparite remotely. If someone located
in NYO could run a comparison between Version 3 and Version 6 and
distribute to this same list it will aid people in the review. Thanks.
Roger
(Enron Assignment and License Agreement) (See attached file: n1bx06!.DOC)
**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (650-802-3000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.
- n1bx06!.DOC << File: n1bx06!.DOC >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Diane,
My request was for the financial deals. But if you have access to the physical RMT/Intercompany -- I would like those too.
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Diane
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:26 PM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: RMT
Susan,
Confirm for me that you want financial deals only......or not.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, Susan
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Anderson, Diane
Subject: RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek
Diane,
As for the RMT matter the request is as follows:
1. Lives Deal as of November 30, 2001
2. Expired Deals since November 30, 2001
3. New Deals since November 30, 2001
Thanks for the help.
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Diane
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek
Ok.
And regarding the Risk Management deals......I forget what we decided....what "begin" date do you want on the query......deals from 12/1/01 forward or was in sometime in November?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, Susan
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Anderson, Diane
Subject: RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek
Diane,
Thanks for confirming that the trades were with ECTRIC and not ENA -- thats what I had thought.
Yes-- please furnish copies of the confirms for the 2 deals to me.
Thanks,
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Diane
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Bailey, Susan; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject: RE: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek
Susan,
I only see two and there were both done with ECTINTL. Do you want to see those?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, Susan
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Anderson, Diane; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject: Sodra Skogsagarna Ek
Diane or Patrick,
Please email or provide hard copies of the Confirmation(s) ENA has with the captioned counterparty.
Thanks
Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
yes
Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
05/17/2001 12:06 PM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Riley/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange
cc:
Subject: Brief on Appeal
Please let me know if you would like a copy of the brief we filed with the
Ninth Circuit. Thanks.
Bob | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 12:56 PM
---------------------------
"Larry W. Bass" <[email protected]> on 12/08/2000 12:48:35 PM
To: KATHY BASS <[email protected]>, kb <[email protected]>, jason
<[email protected]>, eric preston bass <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fw: (no subject)
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:45 PM
Subject: (no subject)
> In a message dated 12/7/00 9:58:03 AM Eastern Standard Time, Charnet222
> writes:
>
> <<
> << This is a simple way to a nice calm happy life!
> > > > > > This is nice reading, but short. Enjoy! This is
> > > > > what
> > > > > > The Dalai Lama has to say on the millennium. All
> > > > > it takes is a few
> > > > > > seconds to read and think it over. Do not keep
> > > > > this message. The mantra
> > > > > > must leave our hands within 96hours. You will
> > > > get
> > > > > a very pleasant
> > > > > > surprise. This is true even if you are not
> > > > > superstitious.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I N S T R U C T I O N S F O R L I F E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Take into account that great love and great
> > > > > > achievements involve great risk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. When you lose, don't lose the lesson.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3. Follow the three R's:
> > > > > > Respect for self
> > > > > > Respect for others and
> > > > > > Responsibility for all your actions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4.Remember that not getting what you want is
> > > > > > sometimes a wonderful stroke of luck.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5. Learn the rules so you know how to break them
> > > > > > properly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6. Don't let a little dispute injure a great
> > > > > > friendship.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 7. When you realize you've made a mistake, take
> > > > > > immediate steps to correct it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 8. Spend some time alone every day.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 9. Open your arms to change, but don't let go of
> > > > > > your values.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 10. Remember that silence is sometimes the best
> > > > > > answer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 11. Live a good, honourable life. Then when you
> > > > > get
> > > > > > older and think back, you'll be able to enjoy it
> > > > a
> > > > > second time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 12. A loving atmosphere in your home is the
> > > > > > foundation for your life.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 13. In disagreements with loved ones, deal only
> > > > > with
> > > > > > the current situation. Don't bring up the past.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 14. Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve
> > > > > > immortality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 15. Be gentle with the earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 16. Once a year, go someplace you've never been
> > > > > > before.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 17. Remember that the best relationship is one
> > > > in
> > > > > > which your love for each other exceeds your need
> > > > > for each other.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 18. Judge your success by what you had to give
> > > > up
> > > > > in
> > > > > > order to get it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 19. Approach love and cooking with reckless
> > > > > abandon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FORWARD THIS MANTRA E-MAIL TO AT LEAST 5 PEOPLE
> > > > > AND
> > > > > > YOUR LIFE WILL IMPROVE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 0-4 people: Your life will improve slightly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5-9 people: Your life will improve to your
> > > > liking.
> > > > > > >>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 04:48 PM -----
Julie Meyers
06/01/2000 04:01 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: J. Aron & Company
Please take me off you distribution. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
On July 16th, SDG&E filed a Motion requesting certain actions from the
Commission necessary to implement its Memorandum of Understanding with DWR.
There are ten CPUC Implementing Decisions provided for in the MOU. The
motion either requests that the action occur or references another CPUC
proceeding where the matter is pending.
Please let me know if Enron is interested in pursuing any matters related to
the SDG&E MOU.
Jeanne Bennett
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruiz, Annie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:33 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Brill, Thomas;
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected].; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Melville, Keith;
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Parrott,
Jeff; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; Young, Judy; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric for Implementation of Memorand
um of Understanding with the State of California
The attached motion and companion pleadings addressing various aspects of
the MOU between CDWR and SDG&E were filed today at the Commission. Several
Advice Letters were filed today that will be distributed by e-mail tomorrow.
The motion to implement the MOU attached hereto does not contain the
numerous attachments that were sent out with the hard copy distribution that
was served today.
Annie Ruiz
Assistant to Jeffrey M. Parrott
Sempra Energy Law Department HQ-13
Tel: 619-696-4903 Fax: 619-699-5027
E-mail: [email protected]
<<A.00-11-038 Implement MOU(v1).DOC>> <<93-12-025 PET TO MODIFY(v1).DOC>>
<<R.94-04-031 MOU Cost Recovery(v1).DOC>> <<A.98-01-014 Motion(v1).DOC>>
<<Notice of Settlement Conf.(v1).DOC>>
- A.00-11-038 Implement MOU(v1).DOC
- 93-12-025 PET TO MODIFY(v1).DOC
- R.94-04-031 MOU Cost Recovery(v1).DOC
- A.98-01-014 Motion(v1).DOC
- Notice of Settlement Conf.(v1).DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 14; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042214.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 12.00 / Final: 11.98)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: EPMI
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
TRADING_SC: CRLP
PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
PURCH_SALE: 1
DEAL_NO: 1
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 64.70 / Final: 64.67)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE3
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
SC_ID: EPMI | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jeff,
It depends on Mark's schedule and whether Susan and I will be out of staff
meeting by 2:30 p.m. We'll try it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Cc: [email protected]; Scott, Susan
Subject: Re: FERC ruling on Kern expansion
My apologies. Just been "ordered" to be on a 1 PM (PDT) call. Possible to
do our call at 2:30 Houston time. Sorry about that.
Best,
Jeff
Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate 04/09/2001 10:34 AM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate,
[email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate Subject: FERC ruling on Kern expansion
I think we said we'd call you at 3:00 p.m. CDT. See 'ya then.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Subject: Re: FERC ruling on Kern expansion
Hmm. Interesting. Thanks for the info. Do we know who got to Breathitt?
Forgive me, but what time did we pick to talk today? And will you call me?
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i had to cover some. too much risk. rode most of it back down. i think this whole event is bearish energy....
-----Original Message-----
From: Fraser, Jennifer
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE:
i'm going to assume you did nothuing about yr book and you are back exactly where you were before all this happened..correct?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject:
seems to me trade guys are getting royally fucked in crude | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 08:26
AM ---------------------------
From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 11/16/2000 06:01 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations
E voila!
Kay Mann@ENRON
11/16/2000 02:47 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations
Ben,
Has the payment allocation chart been updated, and if so, could I get a copy?
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Joe: Per my voice mail. SS
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 10:39 AM -----
Mog Heu@ENRON
03/15/2001 10:29 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
cc: Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Catequil Confirm
Please let me know if there is anything else needed in order to get the
confirms for these deals to go out... They need to go out today.
Here are all the tickets for the trades we have done with Catequil:
QV0879.1
QV0879.5
3/2/01 Catequil sell 1 a day AECO for Nov-March 02 @ -.19
QV0879.2
QV0879.6
3/2/01 Catequil buy 1 a day NGI-Chicago Citygate for Nov-March 02 @ 0.255
+ .005
QV4865.1
QV4865.5
3/6/01 Catequil sell 1 a day AECO for Nov-March 02 @ -.195
QV4865.2
QV4865.6
3/6/01 Catequil buy 1 a day NGI-Chicago Citygate for Nov-March 02 @ 0.245
+ .005
QW3079.1
QW3079.2
3/9/01 Catequil sell 1 a day AECO for May-Oct 01 @ -.195
QW8413.1
QW8413.2
3/13/01 Catequil sell 1 a day AECO for May-Oct 01 @-.25
Mog :) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Just in case worse comes to worse.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 11:29
AM ---------------------------
From: Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/21/2001 10:39 AM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Imbalance gas
Mary we just have two. Thanks - Julie
contract 012-87794-02-001 (delivery)
meter 981506
we owe them 21,771
981244 (delivery) Koch Refinery
we owe them 16,810 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Activity on desks is dramatically scaled back. Most of the time traders are focused on setting curves. Mid office has the most work, booking cancellations out of commercial book into bankruptcy book. Currently it still appears as if the commercial book has more deals in it that the bankruptcy book. Creditors with deals showing significant market-to-market gains in their favor a reluctant to book out of trades and question valuations, suggesting that going to settlement might be preferred. Legal is deciding difference between "executable" contracts (able to negate deal) and "forward" contracts (collapse deal), with one interpretation being beneficial for EES and the other being beneficial for wholesale. South America appears to have similar issues with Duke requesting collateral before willing to book out of transaction, suggesting high likelihood of physical settlement.
In summary, the positions being captured in value-at-risk are questionable, given slow and tedious process of cancellation/booking. However, below is the VAR COB 12/18/01.
Entity VAR Historical VAR
? Corp $68.9MM $60.7MM
? Americas $46.5MM $39.6MM
? Gas $17.6MM $23.8MM
? Power $48.9MM $49.5MM
? So. Cone Pwr $239K $239K
? So. Cone Gas $63K $63K | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000
01:38 PM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe
From: Nick Mooney 04/18/2000 12:47 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Video Conference with Ross McIntyre
no problem just let me know what phone number to link to if youget the VC
Nick | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/04/2000
08:03 AM ---------------------------
Maggie Schroeder
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: lights.exe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/03/2000 09:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials
Kay: Attached is the email I received from Steve Curlee. Who is performing
legal/credit for Enovate? Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 09:06 AM -----
Sara Shackleton
09/28/2000 10:14 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials
Kay: What is this all about? I don't know anything about "ENOVATE" . Is it
an Enron company? Sara.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 10:11 AM -----
Steven Curlee@ENRON
09/28/2000 09:29 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials
Sara, I am forwarding this to you because as you will notice your last name
has been misspelled. I have been speaking with Peoples recently about the
potential sale of some financial options via Enovate. This has brought up to
issue of the ISDA agreement. I don't know if you are the one working on this
specific ISDA, but I got your name off a document showing you as the person
working in general on ISDA agreements between Enovate and third parties.
I will call shortly to insure you receive this, and one more to follow, and
that you are the appropriate person. If you need to reach me, my extension
is 36900.
Thanks,
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron on 09/28/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 09/27/2000 05:37:59 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials
Sara,
We were trying to finalize the ISDA between PEC and Enovate.
Fred is going to be out of the office until Thursday, but I wanted to
forward the ISDA information he has been working on.
Based on the ISDA materials attached, do you know how close (best quess:
number of days, weeks or months) we are to finalizing the contract?
Thanks,
Brian
<<MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>> <<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to
Credit Support.doc>>
<<MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>> <<MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc>>
<<MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>
----------
From: Jacobsen, Fred
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:43 AM
To: Marozas, Brian; Huprikar, Aparna
Cc: Nassos, John G.; Pokorny, Judy
Subject: Enovate/PEC ISDA Materials
Attached please find drafts of the following ISDA documents
to be entered into between Enovate, L.L.C. and Peoples Energy Corporation:
1. Schedule to Master Agreement
2. Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
3. Exhibit A to Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex
4. ISDA Master Agreement
5. ISDA Credit Support Annex.
Brian, please forward to me the contact information for the
person handling the negotiation of these documents on behalf of Enron.
Thank you, Fred.
<<File: MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc>><<File:
MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc>>
<<File: MEH-PEC ISDA.doc>><<File: MEH-PEC Credit Support
Annexy-bi.doc>>
<<File: MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc>>
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
- MEH Schedule to Master Agreement v.1.doc
- MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 to Credit Support.doc
- MEH-PEC ISDA.doc
- MEH-PEC Credit Support Annexy-bi.doc
- MEH-PEC Paragraph 13 Exhibit A.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/12/99 03:25 PM
---------------------------
From: Gail Tholen on 05/12/99 12:15 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Casey Evans/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 1st Qtr 10-Q Outstanding PBC Request Items
Any word on the Nymex Letter?
---------------------- Forwarded by Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT on 05/12/99 12:13 PM
---------------------------
Casey Evans@ENRON
05/03/99 11:49 AM
To: Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe
Travis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lindsay Long/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Walther/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1st Qtr 10-Q Outstanding PBC Request Items
I am attaching a list of the 10-Q items that are still outstanding. We would
like to get this information as soon as possible as our deadline for final
comments on the 10-Q is "scheduled" for May 10. If you have any questions or
foresee any problems in providing the information applicable to you or your
group, please call me at 3-7230 or Jennifer Stevenson at 3-7230.
Thank you for your time.
Casey | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Virginia
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Dunton, Heather
Subject: FW: DPR - WAPA CRSP DMS #8526
heather, can you shed any light on this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Clemons, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Thompson, Virginia
Subject: RE: DPR - WAPA CRSP DMS #8526
Honestly, I don't know - maybe a risk person could better answer. All I know is we only give DPR in the amount of the variance between what they flashed and what we actualized ( finaled ) - Sorry I can't be of more help - maybe ask Casey Evans - A
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Virginia
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:41 PM
To: Clemons, Amy
Cc: Dunton, Heather
Subject: RE: DPR - WAPA CRSP DMS #8526
Amy,
For my own information, how does risk flash only ($ 67,580) worth of tranny purchases in April if EnPower was accounting for ($196,200.00) until the end of May?
Virginia
-----Original Message-----
From: Clemons, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Thompson, Virginia
Subject: DPR - WAPA CRSP DMS #8526
Virginia -
In April Risk flashed ($67,580) for WAPA CRSP trans. You were also given in April , DPR of $3,495.50. This would bring your books to reflect the true/finaled amonut of $64,084.50. The DMS variance was strictly an accounting variance - we used that to adjust to what we accrued - which was the multiplying incorrectly piece. So no more DPR - your books should be good for April WAPA CRSP trans.
Let me know if you have any more questions - A | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 08:30 PM -----
andy brown <[email protected]>
03/19/2001 07:36 PM
Please respond to abb; Please respond to andybrwn
To: Katie Kaplan <[email protected]>
cc: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Bob
Escalante (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'David Parquet'"
<[email protected]>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Frank DeRosa
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Hawks Jack
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Joe
Greco (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Kate Castillo
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<[email protected]>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Paula Soos'"
<[email protected]>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Steve
Iliff'" <[email protected]>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Tony
Wetzel (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "Bob
Szymanski (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "'D. Frank (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'David Dickey (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Doug Levitt (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Eric Edstrom'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Julie Simon (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Mark J. Smith'"
<[email protected]>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Nam
Nguyen'" <[email protected]>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Rich Dyer (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Robert Frees
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Scott Harlan'" <[email protected]>, "'Ted
Cortopassi (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Thomas Heller
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Tom Hartman'" <[email protected]>, "'Ward
Scobee (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Andy Brown
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: IEP FERC/ISO: Draft IEP FERC Cmts on Staff Report
Attached in Word format are the draft IEP comments, due to be filed on the
22nd, regarding the FERC Staff Report on market monitoring and market power
mitigation. This is my suggested approach, which is obviously subject to
change per our discussion during the call tomorrow.
I would like to highlight that the draft characterizes the approach as a
"circuit breaker" during periods of highest demand and suggests that this is
distinct from notions of market power abuse. Other entities are arguing that
during the highest demand, when it exceeds available supplies, all suppliers
have and are "exercising" (as distinct from abusing?) market power. The
draft attempts to highlight the current regional supply context characterized
by the drought as a rationale for the "emergency circuit breaker."
As mentioned in Katie Kaplan's email this morning, if your company has a
draft of comments, we would appreciate an opportunity to look at them to
avoid substantive conflicts.
I trust this is the right distribution list but I was not able to use the
list from this morning's email because of computer problems at my end. ABB
--
Andrew Brown
Sacramento, CA
[email protected]
- DRAFT_010318_el00-95-012_IEP_Cmts_Staff_Rpt.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Eric and Gerald,
I have received the following comments on the Avista Interconnect draft. I
would like to review my responses (in preparation) with you shortly.
Thanks,
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------
HanshawS <[email protected]> on 01/02/2001 02:56:26 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Avista - Brazos Valley Interconnect Agreement
Hope the new year is treating you well.
The Brazos Valley Project is moving forward and we would like to continue
our discussions to finalize the interconnect agreement with HPL.
Attached are comments for your review.
- Comments 1.2.00.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Amy,
I am comfortable with the number for Vasant,
I recommend $95,000 for Paulo.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL
Vince -
Here is the information that I spoke with you about over the phone.
Vasan Shanbhogue $250,000 For 2001, set by Corp, would use about the same number
Paul Issler $37,500 Up to $95,000 based on this year's market data
Thanks for your help!
Amy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Reagan thought you may like to see the Bracewell draft of an Asset Management
Agreement for AIG.
Read it, file it, or throw it away. Completely your call.
Heather
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jay Sonnenberg" <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jay+20Sonnenberg+22+20+3Cjsonnenberg+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3
[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:57 PM
To: Kroll, Heather; Pagan, Ozzie; [email protected]
Cc: Aaron Roffwarg; W. Cleland Dade; Clark Thompson; Scott Miller
Subject: AIG Asset Management Agreement/Brokerage Agreement
Attached please find the initial drafts of the proposed Asset Management
Agreement and Brokerage Agreement for your review. We'll be prepared to turn
around these documents to AIG tomorrow.
Jay
Jay Sonnenberg
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana St., Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77002-2781
(713) 221-1417 (Ph)
(713) 221-2158 (Fax)
- #1142119 v3 - ASSET MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT.doc
- #1276593 v2 - BROKERAGE AGREEMENT.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Terry, please call Jack Meyers (304-623-8811) at CNG Transmission and have
these meters moved from CES/CEM pools to Enron's pools. I think all you need
to do is send CNG a letter requesting;
"Please move all meters flowing into contract 8G0A61 to contract 8G0011".
If CNG needs meter information, maybe you could send them the statement they
send to Gloria, I believe CES/CEM has 11 contracts.
Let me know if you have any questions.
thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000 03:07
PM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
04/05/2000 06:10 PM
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, James T Javins/DUB/EES@EES, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CNG Appalachian production
The CES/CEM CNG Appalachian production is still flowing into the CES/CEM
gathering and transmission contracts. Unless someone objects I would like to
get this moved over to Enron's pool. We don't need to have the gathering and
transmission contracts moved over.
Comments/questions? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (rly-zd04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.228])
by air-zd05.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:43:47 -0500
Received: from housmtp100.halnet.com ([32.97.215.250]) by
rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:43:26 -0500
Received: from gloconn001.halnet.com (GLOCONN001 [34.226.128.21]) by
housmtp100.halnet.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2652.39) id DD0D19QZ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:37:38 -0600
Received: by GLOCONN001 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<DD9FW2H0>; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:36:53 -0600
Message-ID:
<88692DB16951D211A2EE00805F9F305605EF2FD4@houexch010.halexchange.halnet.com>
From: Julianna Grisham <[email protected]>
To: Erica Clark <[email protected]>, George
Sellers-WestPark <[email protected]>, Bob Heckel
<[email protected]>, Gretchen Maddux
<[email protected]>, Steve Palazzo
<[email protected]>, "'Amy Bernie'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ashlea Stuart'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ashley Baxter'"
<[email protected]>, "'Autumn Hugo'" <[email protected]>,
"'Brandee Kirkham'" <[email protected]>, "'Candace Allen'"
<[email protected]>, "'David Thomas - Work'"
<[email protected]>, "'Emily Dreiling - work'"
<[email protected]>, "'Eric Vawter'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ivy Culberson'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jamie Martin'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jenny Scheifley'"
<[email protected]>, "'Kim Fugler'"
<[email protected]>, "'Lauren Dietz'" <[email protected]>,
"'Libbie Woolsey - work'" <[email protected]>, "'Matt Dietz'"
<[email protected]>, "'Mavis Webb'" <[email protected]>,
"'Michelle Buquoi - Work'" <[email protected]>,
"'Niki Stockton'" <[email protected]>, "'Rou Chandler'"
<[email protected]>, "'Sherry Thomas'"
<[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 21 things to remember
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:33:24 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Rodney Grisham [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17,2001 5:55 AM
> To: Grisham, Jocelyn; Grisham, Julianna; Thomas, David
> Subject: 21 things to remember
>
> As we start the NEW YEAR... here are 21 things to remember...
>
> 1. No one can ruin your day without YOUR permission.
> 2. Most people will be about as happy as they decide to be.
> 3. Others can stop you temporarily, but only you can do it permanently.
> 4. Whatever you are willing to put up with is exactly what you will have.
> 5. Success stops when you do.
> 6. When your ship comes in.... make sure you are willing to unload it.
> 7. You will never "have it all together."
> 8. Life is a journey...not a destination. Enjoy the trip!
> 9. The biggest lie on the planet: "When I get what I want, I will be
> happy."
> 10. The best way to escape your problem is to solve it.
> 11. I've learned that ultimately, 'takers' lose and 'givers' win.
> 12. Life's precious moments don't have value, unless they are shared.
> 13. If you don't start, it's certain you won't arrive.
> 14. We often fear the thing we want the most.
> 15. He or she who laughs... lasts.
> 16. Yesterday was the deadline for all complaints.
> 17. Look for opportunities... not guarantees.
> 18. Life is what's coming... not what was.
> 19. Success is getting up one more time.
> 20. Now is the most interesting time of all.
> 21. When things go wrong... don't go with them. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i quit
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
that is absolutely disgusting. i see that you are getting in a better mood. so how was your smoke?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
then you shouldnt sit on his lap, there are extra chairs up here
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
what? mark smith makes me ill. i hate coming up there to talk to him.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
to check out the weather
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
where did you go? i saw you leave
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
i am so ready to get out of here
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject:
it smells like something is on fire down here. and don't say that it's my brain. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have been working with the IT group with the development of a new physical system and reports. I have given them my wish list for reporting but would like you all to see what I've proposed and get any additional requests you may have. Are you all available to attend a 10:00 meeting today to discuss this with them?
Kam
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay, Monica
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Keiser, Kam
Subject: Consolidated Gas System
I thought I sent this but it has been in draft mode...sorry.
I have started the Business Requirements document and stumbled across more questions from meetings with the project team.
I am going to need to know the purpose of each report (why are they used).
For each report how are the fields/columns utilized.
I know the second question could take some time. The types of questions I would need to document are what type of information is being given to generate the reports; what fields/columns are mandatory?; are their any calculations that are used to generate columns or are all of them pulled in from other systems.
Monica Clay
Enron Net Works, LLC
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713-345-7227
1-800-97-ENRON | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daily Blessing
Help someone in need
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless15.htm
New Year Greetings can be found at
http://www.debsfunpages.com/newyearpages.htm
want more coupons the next time you go shopping? check out this link
http://www.daily-blessings.com/orcoolsavings.htm
want to know who's calling when you're online?
http://www.daily-blessings.com/callwave.htm
have you checked out this links for working from home?
http://www.daily-blessings.com/orhome.htm
http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".
OR...
* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address [email protected]
X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected]
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The latest e-Perspectives from the Dallas Fed is now online.
e-Perspectives, Vol. 1, Issue 4
http://www.e-perspectives.org
In this issue...
==================================================================
Remarks by speakers at the Dallas Fed Conference
"New Roads & e-Roads: Market Innovations in Community Development"
==================================================================
* "Seeking Common Ground Through E-Mail (and Finding Our Hardheaded
Hearts)" by Bob McTeer, Dallas Fed President and CEO
* "The Basis of Economic Development in the Inner City: Why Civic
Order Must Come First" by Robert L. Woodson, Sr., Founder and
President, National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise
* "21st Century Demographics: Community Development and Financial
Services" by Lautaro Diaz, Deputy Vice President for Community
Development, National Council of La Raza
================
Did You Know??
================
* 2000 HMDA data are now available on the FFIEC web site.
* Look for links to resources such as the Texas Low Income Housing
Counselor.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have received this message because you subscribe to the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas Community Affairs announcement list.
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to [email protected]
To change your e-mail address, send a message to
[email protected]
with your old address in the subject line
For questions or comments, please contact us at
[email protected].
This message was launched into cyberspace to [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Why is Buxton upset? This is good for consumers? What does he want to change his mind and push this forward? Wouldn't this just lower the prices to his customers?
Also, this is why we need to be constantly pushing the political message in the states.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Barnes, Lynnette
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Ferris, Frank; Fromer, Howard; Lawner, Leslie; Memari, Tooran; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Rishe, Frank; Ross, Derrick; Schoen, Mary; Snyder, Brad; Sullivan, Kathleen; Suttabustya, Buranit; Thome, Jennifer; Truxillo, Wayne; Wininger, James; Ader, Jeff; Anderson, Jonathan; Anderson, Meriwether; Bachmeier, Rick; Bernstein, Eitan; Bernstein, Mark; Bertin, Suzanne; Bolton, Stacey; Chan, Stella; Duda, Geoff; Galow, Gary; Hammond, Pearce; Jackson, Robert; Kazibwe, Julia; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kosnaski, Andrew; Lopez, Yolanda; Meigs, Mark; Ogenyi, Gloria; Steffes, James D.; Boston, Roy; Bray, Peter; Collins, Joan; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Migden, Janine; Stroup, Kerry; Covino, Susan; Magruder, Kathleen; Merola, Becky; Reichelderfer, Thomas; Sandherr, Cynthia
Subject: FERC exceeded jurisdiction w/RTO say consumer groups
FERC Exceeded Jurisdiction With RTO Order - Consumer Grps
Aug. 14, 2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
(This article was originally published Monday) NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- New England consumer advocates Monday said federal energy regulators overstepped their jurisdiction in ordering the consolidation of the wholesale electricity markets and transmission systems in the northeast U.S.
The Federal Energy Commission in mid-July directed operators of the power grids in New York, New England and the Mid-Atlantic to merge, as part of a sweeping series of orders designed to put control of the country's transmission system in independent hands.
Federal law allows the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to require transmission systems to connect, but only at the request of a state regulators, according to a filing made by Maine law firm on behalf of consumer groups, nonprofit energy groups and the attorney general of Massachusetts.
"The Commission makes no claim in the New England Order that it is acting at the behest of a state commission or public utility, and is, therefore, without authority to mandate the involuntary combination of the Northeastern RTOs," the groups said in their filing, which asked FERC to reconsider its consolidation decision.
FERC should give the three Northeast grid operators a transition period to evolve into three regional transmission organization, or RTOs, with similar market designs, transmission tariffs and governance structures before requiring them to merge, the filing said.
The commission directed the operators of the wholesale power grid in New England, New York and the Mid-Atlantic to meet with utilities, generators, trade groups, state regulators and a FERC judge in Washington for 45 days beginning July 19 to outline plans for creating one transmission organization from Washington, D.C., to Maine. The regulators also directed Judge Peter Young to submit recommendation to them 10 days after the conclusion of the talks.
The commission ordered the consolidation of the Northeast power grid "at breakneck speed" without studying the technical feasibility of creating one RTO and without analyzing the costs and benefits of merging, the consumer groups said in their filing.
Young has directed meeting participants not to discuss the substance of the negotiations, but sources familiar with the talks said the group is outlining a business model describing how to structure a Northeast RTO without filling in the details. Participants have said, for example, that this regional market should have one transmission tariff and one interconnection standard, but haven't defined what that tariff and standard should be.
"Many people are very discouraged by the ongoing talks," said Anthony Buxton, an attorney with the Maine law firm that submitted Monday's filing.
All 300 meeting participants have been gathering in Washington twice a week and have been working on the issues every day outside of those meetings, Young said. Next week, they will break off into smaller groups and begin meeting every day, according to Young and market participants.
The commission was in turmoil when it issued its RTO decision, as evidenced by Chairman Curt Hebert's resignation last week, and should therefore reconsider its order, Buxton said.
The consumer groups also asked the commission to allow residential electricity users to have a say in how the unified electricity market in the northeast U.S. will run. Market participants, including consumers, will have an advisory capacity only in this new market and won't be allowed to vote on the rules that govern the market, as they do now, Buxton said.
This decision contradicted another one FERC issued in 1996 requiring utilities to open their transmission lines to competitors. In that order, the commission encouraged New England to create an independent system operator to oversee the power grid and to give market participants equal say in determining how this regional transmission system and electricity market would operate
The consumer groups that filed Monday are working to galvanize other organizations representing residential customers in New England, Buxton said.
"Consumers are going to be at the forefront of a massive attack on FERC for what it's done," Buxton said.
-By Kristen McNamara, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-2061; kristen.mcna <mailto:[email protected]>
713-853-9287
888-703-0309 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron on 11/27/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Deb Cappiello 11/21/2000 09:44 AM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Bischoff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Armstrong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, /ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Branney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Fowler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Connie Hook/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Mason/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny
McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Nielsen/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frank Oldenhuis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Semin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Neal Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G
Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, LD Stephens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, India
Torres/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Revised Phone List Attached
---------------------- Forwarded by Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Deb Cappiello 11/21/2000 09:41 AM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Bischoff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Armstrong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, /ET&S/Enron@Enron, Marlene McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Badura/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Branney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Reyna Cabrera/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Fowler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Connie Hook/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Mason/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Miriam Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny
McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Nielsen/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Frank Oldenhuis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don
Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Pilar
Ramirez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Semin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Neal Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G
Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, LD Stephens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, India
Torres/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Revised Phone List
Additions: Jan Moore, India Torres -
Changes: Passcode No. for morning/weekend conference no. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes I have but I just cancelled Der. II.
thanks,
Monika
-----Original Message-----
From: Cruz, Magdelena
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: Have you taken Deriv. I? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
For those of you interested in a more detailed document regarding the
FERC
Order for SDG&E vs. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services.
Please use the link provided below.
Thank you.
http://www.ferc.fed.us/news1/pressreleases/calpress.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The following deals have been created and entered in Sitara effective 11/1/00
at meter # 98-0435:
Counterparty Deal # Nom Price (IFHSC less)
Amerada Hess 465994 2,822 0.065
Anadarko Petroleum 465995 1,148 0.065
Apache Corp 465998 1,379 0.065
Barrett Resources 466000 1,597 0.06
Crosstex Energy Svcs 466003 682 0.065
Mariner Energy 466008 350 0.055
Ocean Energy 466014 3,750 0.065
Seneca Resources 466016 3,195 0.06
St. Mary Land & Expl 466017 3,299 0.065
Walter Oil & Gas 466021 6,778 0.055
Dummy 456228 25,000 Killed
Bob | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the final 2001 Plan for Deal Bench, please call if you have any
questions. Thanks Amy 3-7805
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Spoede/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 04:37 PM
---------------------------
Elise Clark@ENRON
12/04/2000 04:06 PM
To: Amy Spoede/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Budget for 2001
---------------------- Forwarded by Elise Clark/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------
Michael K Patrick
12/04/2000 03:20 PM
To: Elise Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Budget for 2001
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000
02:33 PM ---------------------------
From: Harry Arora@ECT on 12/04/2000 02:41 PM
To: Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Budget for 2001
Mike
Can you provide me the final budget for DealBench for 2001. Thanks
Harry | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
F.Y.I.
Business; Financial Desk
Sempra Still Feeling the Heat Energy: The parent firm of 2 Southern
California
utilities is weathering criticism from all sides, with more flare-ups on
the horizon.
NANCY RIVERA BROOKS
09/17/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page C-1
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
Sempra Energy just can't seem to get out of the hot seat.
First there was the controversial 1998 merger between the parents of San
Diego Gas &
Electric and Southern California Gas, which created the Sempra Energy
holding company
and gave it more customers--21 million--than any other utility company in
the nation.
Now, although the calendar says autumn is less than a week away, warm
weather still has
Sempra sweating through a summer of electricity discontent. And winter
doesn't look like
much fun either for Sempra or its natural-gas customers, with residential
gas bills projected
to increase 30% to 35% without fueling anything above a strictly regulated
rate of return for
Sempra's gas utilities.
Hanging over the San Diego-based energy company is a new uncertainty
generated by the
turmoil in California's restructuring electricity industry. Of particular
concern to the
investment community is a rapidly swelling debt caused by the difference
between the high
wholesale cost of electricity and the freshly capped retail power rates for
the 1.2 million
customers of San Diego Gas & Electric.
Who will pay that debt--Sempra Energy's shareholders or SDG&E's electricity
customers--and how big it will grow may not be known for years. The answer
will hinge in
part on an investigation of SDG&E's conduct by the California Public
Utilities Commission.
In the meantime, Sempra Energy, whose two utilities serve nearly 7 million
gas and
electricity meters representing about 21 million customers from Central
California to the
Mexican border, continues to post sparkling earnings largely because of its
non-utility
businesses. Sempra wants to be much more than its utilities, pushing into
energy trading
and electricity and natural-gas contracting outside of California.
Indeed, Sempra has stressed that recent profit surges came not at the
expense of its
California utility customers. Consumer advocates are not persuaded,
painting Sempra as a
profit-hungry company that has not done enough to protect ratepayers.
Despite all the tumult, Sempra's previously languid stock price has risen a
bit this summer,
a fact that appears to amaze even Stephen L. Baum, Sempra's new chairman
and chief
executive.
"Maybe it's all the publicity we've been getting," he recently quipped,
ruefully.
It's a careful-what-you-wish-for proposition for Sempra Energy, which spent
hundreds of
thousands of dollars in the last two years to boost its corporate profile
by, among other
things, becoming a sponsor of Staples Center and rolling out a new logo
that looks like a
small flaming man. Now the corporation and its San Diego utility are
puzzling over how to
repair an image so scorched that angry residents in SDG&E's
4,200-square-mile territory
covering the San Diego area and southern Orange County have taken to
verbally and
physically abusing company employees.
"This has been an agonizing time for all of us," Baum told the Federal
Energy Regulatory
Commission at a hearing Tuesday that is part of an investigation into this
summer's
gyrations in the California wholesale electricity market. "SDG&E takes
enormous pride in
serving this community with safe and reliable electric service at, what
were until recently,
just and reasonable prices."
Although regulators themselves, not to mention consumer advocates, warned
of looming
shortages in power supplies, no one predicted this summer of sky-high
prices during which
wholesale electricity prices jumped fivefold and bills doubled for SDG&E
customers, the
first in the country to pay free-market power prices.
That produced a "Ratepayer Rebillion"--so dubbed by Michael Shames,
executive director
of the San Diego-based Utility Consumers Action Network, a longtime SDG&E
sparring
partner. The shock waves quickly reached utility regulators and state
lawmakers, the
architects of electricity deregulation , who are still scrambling for
solutions.
"SDG&E has become the corporate equivalent of the gang that couldn't shoot
straight,"
Shames said. "They have the distinction of having the market blow up on
them in a very
visible way . . . and I'm quite convinced they didn't have a clue how
customers were going
to respond."
This high-voltage atmosphere visited the San Diego area because SDG&E did
such a good
job selling its power plants, as required under deregulation . The 1996 law
that launched
the overhaul of California's electricity world broke the industry into
three separate
businesses: companies that make electricity, companies that distribute
electricity and
companies that sell electricity directly to consumers and businesses.
SDG&E and the state's other big investor-owned utilities--Edison
International unit Southern
California Edison and PG&E Corp.'s Pacific Gas & Electric--lost their
secure monopoly
status. They were deemed to be electricity distribution companies
only--though still
monopolies in that segment of the business.
The utilities handed over their long-distance transmission systems to a new
nonprofit, the
California Independent System Operator, and were required to buy their
electricity from
another new nonprofit, the California Power Exchange. The utilities
remained the default
provider for customers who didn't pick a new electricity retailer, but they
were required to
pass along the cost of electricity with no markup.
Electricity rates for consumers and small businesses were frozen until the
utilities paid off
their "stranded assets"--investments in nuclear power and renewable energy
contracts that
became unprofitable under deregulation --or until March 2002. Rates are
still frozen for
SCE and PG&E customers, but SDG&E customers lost that protection in July
1999, after
the San Diego utility sold its power plants to eager buyers who were
willing to pay much
more than book value.
The rapid payoff surprised even regulators, who had developed no
post-freeze rules. The
California Public Utilities Commission allowed SDG&E to maintain a 12%
ceiling on prices
for the summer of 1999 and recoup any excess electricity costs later.
Thanks to a cool
summer and a smoothly functioning wholesale market, the ceiling was little
employed.
This summer, however, no ceiling was allowed by the PUC as part of its
original post-freeze
order, SDG&E executives said. And prices on the California Power Exchange
began
behaving strangely, spiking higher and higher even in the middle of the
night when demand
was low.
San Diego-area electricity users began seeing "true market prices from a
market that's
dysfunctional," Baum said. "Of course I wish we had foreseen this market
spike. We
didn't."
Consumer fury has been calmed somewhat by a new law that caps electricity
prices for
SDG&E residential and small-business customers at 6.5 cents a
kilowatt-hour, compared
with the 21.5-cent peak this summer. Who will eventually pay the
electricity costs above
the cap, currently collecting in a balancing account, is left unclear by
the legislation.
It could mean a big balloon payment for customers, or some of the costs
could be shared
by SDG&E if a PUC investigation finds that the utility didn't act in the
best interests of its
customers in buying electricity. A companion bill that would use $150
million in taxpayer
funds to defray some of the costs passed the Legislature but has not been
signed by Gov.
Gray Davis.
"I don't think that we did anything wrong," Baum said. "This is a bum rap
that has been
hung on us, on SDG&E, that we somehow mismanaged the power supply for our
customers."
PUC officials and consumer advocates have criticized SDG&E for not
"hedging" more by
buying ahead of time when prices are relatively low, for example. SDG&E
said that it asked
the commission for such authority but didn't get it. What's more, Baum
said, SDG&E found
better prices for its customers than did SCE or PG&E, even though they have
broader
hedging ability.
SDG&E will have to borrow money to pay for the electricity, since
ratepayers aren't paying
the full cost. SDG&E says the under-collection of electricity costs could
eventually top
$800 million, whereas sponsors of the rate-cap bill put the total closer to
$150 million.
The future debt and the unsettled state of the deregulation process in
California were the
reasons given when Moody's Investors Service recently changed the credit
outlook for
Sempra and SDG&E to "negative."
Shareholders can't be happy with Sempra's stock price, which fell from a
high of about $28
a share right after the 1998 merger between Enova and Pacific Enterprises,
which was
loudly opposed by consumer advocates because of the market clout a merged
company
would wield, to a low of $16.63 in April. Sempra bought back 36.1 million
shares at $20
each in February and lowered the stock dividend to $1 a share from $1.56 a
share. The
stock closed Friday up 14 cents at $20.14 on the New York Stock Exchange.
Baum acknowledged that the company has lagged in return to shareholders,
blaming that
partly on a turning away by investors from utilities and other old-economy
companies to
Internet and other new-economy stocks.
Sempra wants to be much more than its utilities and has made some promising
inroads
into unregulated areas, such as energy commodity trading,
telecommunications,
power-plant building and the sale of electricity and natural-gas to
consumers and
businesses in other states, Mexico, South America and Canada, analysts said.
In fact, Sempra Energy Trading, which buys and sells electricity, natural
gas, oil and coal,
earned more money in the first quarter--$3 million--than in all of 1999.
That subsidiary's $40
million in second-quarter earnings was primarily responsible for Sempra's
better-than-expected income for the period of $110 million, or 55 cents a
diluted share, up
34% from the second quarter of last year.
Analyst Paul Fremont of Jefferies & Co., who has a "buy" rating on Sempra,
notes that the
trading company income will be volatile and that the other subsidiaries
remain unknown
quantities.
"They've really got to have sustained growth in that [unregulated] part of
the business
because there's not a lot of growth in the utility part" in California,
Fremont said.
Sempra's earnings growth during this electricity furor has consumer
advocates fuming even
though company executives emphasized that electricity trading gains came
from the East,
not California.
"Consumers don't need to feel sorry for this company," said Mindy Spatt,
spokeswoman for
the Utility Reform Network, also known as TURN, a San Francisco-based
consumer group.
Spatt noted that Sempra's new El Dorado power plant near Las Vegas "did
very well"
selling electricity in Nevada and California during most of the second
quarter.
"We don't think consumers should be responsible for the failures of
deregulation , and we
think that Sempra is in a much better position to pay for some of these
costs than the
average San Diegan," Spatt said.
Sempra has had some problems in reaching beyond its California utility
origins. One
subsidiary, Energy America, which sells electricity and natural gas door to
door in six
Eastern states, has run afoul of regulators in two states because of
aggressive sales
tactics that prompted complaints from consumers. The company has been
variously fined
and ordered to retrain salespeople.
Sempra is on track to reach its goal of reaping one-third of its earnings
from its
non-California businesses by the end of 2003 and to increase overall
earnings by 8% to
10% compounded annually in the next four years, Baum said.
That success is whipping up customer ire.
"People tend to look at Sempra-SDG&E as a monolith. . . . People are
saying, 'They're
making a ton of money here. That company is doing very well. We're getting
screwed, and
we don't like it, and why should we have to pay for it?' " Baum said. "It's
a very natural
reaction. People don't understand, and they don't care to understand."
One of SDG&E's immediate concerns is fixing relations with its customers.
Baum said the
utility recently polled customers and found that 9% considered it credible,
down from 35%
("which is not much to brag about, but it's not bad in the utility
business") before the
electricity crisis.
"I don't know that a corporation can do very well with a credibility rating
of 9% on a
sustained basis. That is something I worry about," Baum said.
SDG&E President Debra L. Reed said most customers don't understand that the
investor-owned utilities are now only distribution companies, despite a
$90-million education
campaign by the Public Utilities Commission.
"They see our name on the bill and they think we're making money on the
commodity,"
Reed said. "We have a lot of education to do with our customers. But we
realize that it is
probably not the best time to educate them in the middle of what they see
as a crisis. . . .
What we're trying to do is help them through this."
(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)
Metering Sempra Energy
Earnings are up at Sempra Energy, but the San Diego company is spiking on
the
controversy meter because of soaring bills for customers of its utilities,
San Diego Gas &
Electric and Southern California Gas. Sempra's name is not well-known, but
its utilities
serve 21 million people from the Central Valley to the Mexican border.
(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)
Branching Out
Sempra Energy also is pushing into other businesses, primarily outside of
California:
Sempra Energy Trading: Trades energy commodities
Sempra Energy International: Develops and operates energy projects such as
power plants
and natural gas lines in international markets
Sempra Energy Solutions: Markets electricity, natural gas and energy
services to large
electricity users
Sempra Energy Resources: Develops or buys power plants and natural gas
facilities in the
United States
Sempra Communications: Invests in telecommunications
Sempra Energy Financial: Invests in affordable housing partnerships
Source: Company reports
PHOTO: Sempra's San Diego headquarters; ; GRAPHIC: Metering Sempra Energy,
Los
Angeles Times;
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Financial
Is Another Energy Crisis Ahead?; Winter Fuel Costs Will Rise; After That,
Nothing Is
Certain
Kenneth Bredemeier
09/17/2000
The Washington Post
FINAL
Page H01
Copyright 2000, The Washington Post Co. All Rights Reserved
This winter the mailman will be delivering markedly higher heating bills
throughout much of
the country, including the Washington area.
Those who use natural gas--the dominant heating fuel in the Washington area
and
throughout the United States--face a 27 percent increase. Heating oil
customers,
particularly in the Northeast where 35 percent of homeowners use the fuel
to warm their
houses, may have to pay more than $2 a gallon--twice the current price--as
the days grow
shorter and temperatures plunge.
Motorists get hit in the wallet every time they pull into a service
station: They now typically
pay more than $1.60 a gallon for gas, and the days of 90-cent-a-gallon
gas--yes, it was just
last year--are but a distant memory. At least that's better than in
England, France and
Belgium where motorists are waiting in long lines to buy $4-a-gallon gas,
only to find that
some stations have run out.
Is this the start of an energy crisis?
Many energy analysts and government economists say not, that supplies of
various forms
of energy will prove sufficient over the next few months, but that the
costs will continue to
follow the law of supply and demand. When there's not an excess of a fuel
available--and
numerous types of fuel reserves are quite low--consumers will likely think
the product costs
too much, at least compared with the prices they've been accustomed to
paying.
But as winter approaches, several loosely connected events that spanned the
globe over
the past couple of years have heightened awareness of energy in our lives
and reminded us
of a lesson learned in the 1970s: Energy prices can be volatile,
unpredictable and can
reverberate throughout the economy.
As Philip Verleger Jr., a partner with the Brattle Group, a Cambridge,
Mass., economic
consulting firm, concluded, "Consumers will have to spend more on energy.
They will have
less to spend on other things."
On top of the triple-whammy of higher natural gas, heating oil and gasoline
prices,
consumers are also vulnerable to the vagaries of the electricity market
because the industry
has been in the midst of deregulation .
While California and other states have struggled with power prices during
the adjustment to
the new competitive environment, electric utilities locally have maintained
stability.
Potomac Electric Power Co. says its 621,000 residential customers in the
District and
suburban Maryland--about 15 percent to 20 percent of whom heat their homes
with
electricity--will find their bills about 5.5 percent lower this winter,
assuming they use the
same amount of electricity as last year. Across the Potomac River,Dominion
Virginia
Power's customers in Northern Virginia are likely to see their bills stay
about the same.
Much of the current energy pricing is out of consumers' hands, analysts
say, because the
United States has chosen, to a large degree, to remain dependent on oil
pumped out of
distant lands controlled by OPEC nations.
The 11-member Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed last
weekend to
increase its oil production by 800,000 barrels a day in hopes of pushing
the price down to
$28 or so. Even so, oil prices hit a new 10-year high on Friday, closing at
$35.92 a barrel
amid worries about tensions between Iraq and Kuwait. These are prices not
seen since the
days of the military buildup before the Persian Gulf War in November 1990.
Analysts say that 21 months ago, when oil was below $10 a barrel and
natural gas was at
$2 per 1,000 cubic feet, drilling companies, many of which produce both
fuels, began to
curtail their exploration as a result of dwindling revenue.
The OPEC nations cut their production at the time to force prices
upward--and now they
have more than tripled. Private exploration for more natural gas in the
United States, chiefly
in the Gulf of Mexico and several southern and southwestern states, only
grew after drillers
concluded that the demand was significant enough and they had sufficient
capital to look
for more.
Peggy Laramie, spokeswoman for the American Gas Association, the
natural-gas utilities'
trade group, said the low price of gas at the time contributed to a feeling
by producers that
there was plenty of supply, so they cut back on drilling for about nine
months, from August
1998 to April 1999. Fewer than 400 rigs were drilling at the time, although
now that figure
has topped 800.
With little new natural gas exploration, the flow through the supply chain
slowed, of course,
even as demand increased in the United States, Europe and Asia.
The result was predictable: Higher natural-gas prices at the wellhead and,
over time, bigger
bills for consumers. The $2 wellhead price has now risen to $5. Laramie
said the last time
wellhead prices were this high was in 1985.
As Verleger said, "Demand was growing. We didn't pick up the supply
and--whoops, there's
a problem."
In the Washington area, where perhaps 70 percent of all homeowners heat
with natural gas,
Washington Gas Light Co. estimates that its residential customers will see
the typical
monthly bill jump $26, to $112.50, in the November-to-April period, a 27
percent increase
over last winter.
Laramie said the gas utilities' trade group believes that with the renewed
exploration, natural
gas prices "will be moderating by spring, but we don't want to
over-promise."
The price of oil and its derivative products is expected to remain
volatile, depending on a
host of factors, including demand by consuming nations, the severity of the
upcoming
winter months after a string of three relatively mild winters, and how much
more oil OPEC
nations might decide to produce if prices stay high.
This mix of factors leaves the analysts, OPEC and government economists
using a lot of
"ifs" and "buts" and "possibilities," but mentioning few certainties.
OPEC President Ali Rodriguez predicted this past week that oil prices could
reach $40 a
barrel this winter, even if only for a relatively short time.
"Crude oil prices are very high and will remain very high throughout the
rest of the year,"
said John Lichtblau, chairman of the Petroleum Industry Research
Foundation, which is
funded by oil companies. In terms of gasoline, a shortage is unlikely, "but
prices will be
high," he said. "It can go back to $1.40 a gallon because of more
production and lower
crude prices. It won't start right now, maybe later this year or early next
year."
But with heating oil, he said, an unusually cold winter in the Northeast
could bring about
problems, given low inventories. "I don't see a shortage, but prices will
be very high."
Verleger was less certain.
"We do have a problem," he said. "I think we're going to see high prices
this winter for
heating oil and natural gas. But I'm not certain about it. I'm not willing
to go out and say it's
going to be awful."
With oil prices at record levels, President Clinton last week came under
increasing
pressure to tap the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, nearly 570
million barrels of crude
oil stashed at four sites in Louisiana and Texas.
The reserve is intended for use in cases where the president determines
there is a national
supply emergency. High prices alone do not qualify. The White House says
all options to
combat the current low reserves of various fuels and high prices are under
consideration. In
the past, however, the oil reserve has been tapped to combat mechanical
breakdowns in
the oil industry's pipeline system or to trade lower-quality oil for a
better grade.
"If the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is released, that would knock $15 a
barrel off the price,"
Verleger said. "One piece of news like that and this [crude oil price] will
drop like a rock."
At least for the winter months, electric utilities generally have found a
way around the high
price of oil and natural gas that some of them must use during peak-demand
periods in the
summer to generate electricity. They're able to focus their winter
generation on cheaper
fuels--coal, nuclear and hydroelectric power.
"That's cheaper fuel and fuel that's less subject to the volatility of the
world oil and world
natural-gas markets," said Chuck Linderman, director of energy generation
and supply
policy for the Edison trade group. "Generally we're in good shape on
supply."
Contact: http://www.washingtonpost.com
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steve:
I have now heard back from both Louise and Andy and neither one will be
available. Unfortunately, Mark has now left again and I am on my way out on
vacation for a couple of weeks. It might make sense for you to contact Mark
directly since you will be able to get to him before I can.
Sorry about that.
Mark
[email protected]
09/20/2000 11:25 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: FW: Energy Bar Program
Mark,
Just wanted to mention to you that if either Louise Kitchens, Andy Zipper or
Mark Haedicke are interested in participating in the Energy Bar program but
is not yet in a position to make a firm commitment, we can list the speaker
as "invited" for the first mailing and then make any corrections that are
necessary on a subsequent mailing that will be distributed.? Of course, the
Bar Association would not list a speaker as "invited" without prior
authorization.? Would it be possible to get back to me today on an
EnronOnline speaker?? Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule
to provide assistance.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kramer, Steven
Sent:?? Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:23 PM
To:???? '[email protected]'
Subject:??????? FW: Energy Bar Program
Mark,
Just wanted to mention to you that if either Louise Kitchens, Andy Zipper or
Mark Haedicke are interested in participating in the Energy Bar program but
is not yet in a position to make a firm commitment, we can list the speaker
as "invited" for the first mailing and then make any corrections that are
necessary on a subsequent mailing that will be distributed.? Of course, the
Bar Association would not list a speaker as "invited" without prior
authorization.? Would it be possible to get back to me today on an
EnronOnline speaker?? Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule
to provide assistance.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kramer, Steven
Sent:?? Friday, September 15, 2000 11:30 AM
To:???? '[email protected]'
Subject:??????? Energy Bar Program
Mark,
I am not sure if you had a chance to contact Louise Kitchens or Andy Zipper
regarding the Energy Bar Association program, but I just wanted to check.? If
neither of them are available, has Mark Haedicke returned from travel?? If
so, would you recommend that I give him a call.
I know that you are very busy and greatly appreciate your assistance.
Steve
Steven M. Kramer
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
International Square Building
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
TEL:? 202-835-7508
FAX:? 202-835-7586
[email protected]
This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000
09:26 AM ---------------------------
juan hernandez <[email protected]> on 09/22/2000 11:23:31 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Alex Hernandez at 2-day
The Hernandez Clan keeps getting larger.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
- Alexdrew.jpg
- Myhomey.jpg
- Family.jpg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dan Hyvl - we sent them a draft two/three weeks ago.
From: Sara Shackleton on 04/20/2001 04:36 PM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement
Kim: Mark Russell asked what lawyer will handle the gas master physical.
Have you spoken with a physical lawyer yet?
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 04:35 PM -----
Kim Ward
04/20/2001 04:01 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement
Sara,
Attached is Salt River Projects ISDA attachments. I know that we have
previously sent them our attachments (in 1999). Mark Russell of SRP will be
contacting you to negotiate this agreement. I hope it is ok that I have him
your name. Please let me know if there is anything that I can do to help and
keep me posted on developments.
Thanks!
Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 03:59 PM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/05/2001 05:28:19 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement
I have attached our standard CSA and Schedule. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 9:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement
Mark,
The best person to talk to about the ISDA is me. I discussed an ISDA with
Tim Roberts when I was in the Salt River offices on March 23rd. A draft
ISDA was sent to Bill Abraham on November 17, 1999. I requested for a new
legal review on 3/28/01. Let me know if you need a new draft and I can
send you or Tim a copy. My number is 713-853-0685.
Thanks for your inquiry -
Kim Ward
[email protected] on 04/05/2001 08:20:15 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement
I have been trying to get an ISDA going with Enron for several months. Who
is the best contact to call?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Master purchase/sale agreement
Kent,
Attached is a draft copy of our Master Purchase/Sale Agreement for physical
natural gas transactions. As I mentioned before, we can enter into
transactions for less that one year out. However, for those outside of a
year and for longer terms, we need to have a master in place. Hopefully,
we can get this one in place so that we will be prepared when/if we get
ready to transact.
Let me know if you have any questions. I will have our legal guys standing
by to help, too.
Thanks,
Kim Ward
(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)
(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)
- 01101.sample credit annex isda.doc
- 011101.sample isda schedule.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Team:
Our objective is to define an action plan for each account and dedicate resources to implement the collection process.
Regards,
Brian
Janet H Wallis
04/10/2001 01:12 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren Farmer
cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Bad Debt
Please plan to attend a meeting with Brian Redmond and Bob Hall on Thursday at 4:00 in conference room 3567.
Each person should be prepared to discuss the current status of each "Bad Debt" account that was assigned to them in February.
If you are unable to attend you will need to schedule a private meeting with Brian Redmond at a later date.
Janet | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am fine with your explanation as well. Is anyone complaining about only one person being able to
view the info? Thanks. Lynn
-----Original Message-----
From: Dietz, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: NNG Flowing Gas Documents
Thanks for the clarification, Larry. I don't think we need to meet to discuss this issue. I guess that I just misunderstood your initial message to imply that certain documents were still unaccessible to customers. I'm satisfied.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Berger, Larry
Sent: Tue 10/16/2001 10:01 AM
To: Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick
Cc:
Subject: RE: NNG Flowing Gas Documents
Rick and Lynn,
A customer can access all of NNG accounting documents( all invoices and their supporting documents). However, due to tighter security coding in Business Objects compare to Actuate, reports are now only viewable by one party, instead of two parties. For example, at a poi where there is an agent and an operator, the agent is only able to view the Measurement Info, Daily Volume Allocation and Allocation statements. IT is researching a fix to a situation like this.
If you still would like to meet with me to explain further, give a demo (or have lunch meeting with just the three of us!), let me know.
Thanks
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:30 AM
To: Dietz, Rick; Berger, Larry; Garcia, Ava
Subject: RE: NNG Flowing Gas Documents
Ava, please coordinate with Alma a time Rick, Larry and I can talk about the
flowing gas documents no accessible to customers. Thanks. Lynn
-----Original Message-----
From: Dietz, Rick
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: NNG Flowing Gas Documents
I am very glad to hear that the key documents are up, running and accessible. I would like to discuss the documents that the customers cannot access. I would like to totally focus on the new contract system on Monday so Tuesday would fit my schedule better.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Berger, Larry
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn
Cc: Berger, Larry
Subject: NNG Flowing Gas Documents
Rick and Lynn,
I just wanted to give you an official memo that the NNG Flowing Gas Documents are now online with both the Reservation, Commodity, Variance and Imbalance invoices and their supporting documents. NNG Customers are able to view both the Aug and Sep 2001 accounting month reports. The customer can also view the 5 original Flowing Gas documents (Contract Imbalance, Shipper Imbalance, Invoices (Reservation and Commodity only), Allocation, and Measurement Information) from May 2000 to Aug 2001 accounting months via a hyperlink to Actuate.
During the next couple of months, I will still be working with the NNG reps and customers on various issues regarding the Flowing Gas reports: for instance, researching why the customer cannot access certain documents. I will also be meeting with Legale and IT weekly on enhancements to Flowing Gas that are needed.
See me if you have questions.
Larry | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/12/2000 12:45:38 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Apology
Dear Sir,
I would like to apologize for the mistake in my previous email. Please find
the copy of the letter mentioned earlier in this email. Again, I'm sorry
for the inconvenience.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Khairuddin Jaafar
(See attached file: Enron.lwp)
DISCLAIMER : This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("Message")
is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may
contain confidential information. You are hereby notified that the
taking of any action in reliance upon, or any review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or any
part thereof by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this Message in error, you should
delete this Message immediately and advise the sender by return e-mail.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this Message that do not
relate to the official business of PETRONAS or its Group of Companies
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by PETRONAS or any of
the companies within the Group.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic25324.pcx)
- Enron.lwp
- pic25324.pcx | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 08:44 AM -----
Chris Long@ENRON
04/24/2001 08:33 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Larry Decker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Bankrutpcy Update
No. 79
Tuesday April 24, 2001 Page A-33
ISSN 1523-567X
Regulation, Law & Economics
BankruptcyDaschle Says Bankruptcy Reform Stuck
As Party Roles in Conference Still in Limbo
Bankruptcy legislation (S. 420/H.R. 333) that separately passed the Senate
and House earlier this spring remains in limbo, as the Senate still cannot
agree on how to proceed to conference with the House, Senate Minority Leader
Thomas Daschle (D-S.D.) told reporters April 23.
The question of party representation in conference continues to stall efforts
to bring the issue of bankruptcy reform to a close. Democrats, who occupy
half of the Senate's seats, are insisting upon equal representation in
conference, while Republicans oppose it.
Efforts to forego a conference with the House are unlikely to succeed given
House leadership concerns about a number of controversial amendments the
Senate made to S. 420 before passing it. In particular, many Republicans
object to provisions opposed by President Bush that are intended to make it
harder for debtors to shield assets by purchasing expensive homes in states
that bar creditors from seizing the homes in bankruptcy auctions.
"There has been no resolution yet," Daschle said. "I would say that I think
both [Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.)] and I and our staffs are
working to try to resolve his concern, which is what do you do in a tie ...
You know, I think what happens in a tie is [that] you just keep talking until
you break the tie."
Daschle said he is looking for an "opportunity to break through," but has yet
to find one. Regardless, Daschle said he does not think "tie votes are all
that big a problem, either in conference or in committee."
With Daschle voting in the affirmative, the Senate March 14 approved 80-19 a
cloture motion Lott filed late March 12. Sen. Paul Wellstone (D-Minn.), the
bill's most outspoken opponent, argued passionately against cloture and Sen.
Harry Reid (D-Nev.) foiled an attempt by Lott to secure unanimous consent to
prepare the bill for a conference with House members after the bill passed
the Senate March 15.
In general, the bills aim to force more bankruptcy filers to file under
Chapter 13, which requires some repayment of debts, instead of Chapter 7. The
bills are a copy of last year's conference report worked out between the
House and the Senate, which former President Clinton pocket-vetoed in
December.
Copyright , 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington D.C. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the names and numbers. I have just called and talked with
Jonathan Beck and Jenia Nikolova; have left voice mail messages of
congratulations for Jeremy Fitzpatrick, Matthew Olney, David Scott, Corrinn
Sutton, and Thomas Underwood; and left a message with a roommate for Ryan
White. I did not get an answer of any kind when I tried Thomas Lowell's
number. He is the only one that I have not contacted at this point. I will
try his number again before I leave tonight. --Sally
Enron North America Corp.
From: Lexi Elliott @ ENRON 10/18/2000 04:45 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McConnell/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: OU Super Saturday Candidates
Dear OU Team Members and Interviewers:
Thank you for your time and help this recruiting season. While there is
still much to do, we are now to the point where we will soon begin to reap
rewards!
After last week's interview process, we have selected 9 candidates to invite
to the November 4th Super Saturday.
Those candidates are:
1. Jonathan Beck (405/579-8594)
2. Jeremy Fitzpatrick (405/447-6144)
3. Thomas Lowell (405/573-1103)
4. Jenia Nikolova (405/325-9435)
5. Matthew Olney (405/360-0311)
6. David Scott (405/812-5538)
7. Corrinn Sutton (405/292-7881)
8. Thomas Underwood (405/292-1108)
9. Ryan White (405/292-1470)
I personally called each candidate today to invite them to Super Saturday.
Their formal letters will be sent later in the week.
Our next step will be to cultivate these candidates. I will be assigning a
candidate to selected team members next week for cultivation calls. In the
mean time, please feel free to call and congratulate them (just please let me
know who you call so no one is left out!)
Thanks again for your dedication!
lexi
3-4585 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
TASK ASSIGNMENT
Status: completed
Task Priority:
Task Due On:
Task Start Date:
Meet with Richard to create format
Call Louise to get process started | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Holden, let me know if you want to sign up for this fantastic opportunity.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heizenrader, Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Swain, Steve; Gilbert, Scotty; Steiner, David; Williams III, Bill; Semperger, Cara; Amador, Susan; Thomas, Jake; Mainzer, Elliot; Alonso, Tom; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Crandall, Sean; Driscoll, Michael M.; Fischer, Mark; Mallory, Chris; Motley, Matt; Platter, Phillip; Richter, Jeff; Salisbury, Holden; Scholtes, Diana; Swerzbin, Mike
Subject: FW: Visual Basic Class
Anybody have candidates for this?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: SCHILMOELLER, Michael
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Boo Seng-Aroun; Dieterle, Chris; NIMAN, MIKE; Oshea, Mike; Ichikawa, Shinya
Cc: Heizenrader, Tim
Subject: Visual Basic Class
A Developmentor manager has an introductory VB class locally that he is trying to fill. I took a COM+/2000 class from them in December, and they are first class. How many of us would be interested (no commitment at this point)?
I believe this is Developmentor's 12/3 one-week course (see <http://www.develop.com/dm/course.asp?id=10>) It ordinarily goes for $1800 per person.
Mike N, can you give me some guidance regarding how much cost per person or how much cost total you would be prepared to pay. Again, he is trying to fill up a class that is about to be cancelled, and I think he would be willing to negotiate.
Tim, would you or anyone on your floor have any interest in this?
Michael | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
No I don't get this newsletter.
-----Original Message-----
From: Carter, Karen E.
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:52 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Pulpex Weekly no. 191
Monika,
Do you receive this newsletter from the Pulpex?
KC
-----Original Message-----
From: Marilene Listrom [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Marilene Listrom
Subject: Pulpex Weekly no. 191
(See attached file: PulpexWeekly_191.pdf)(See attached file: Pulpex_Broker_
List2.doc)
This file can be read using Adobe Acrobat Reader
It is also available in a *.rtf format. If you prefer to receive the bulletin in
this format, please advise me by return email. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
ask her to let us know the outcome of the conversation tomorrow asap.
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Botello, Mary
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: FW: Allocations in the 2002 Plan
Importance: High
-----Original Message-----
From: Linnell, Elizabeth
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:33 PM
To: Botello, Mary
Subject: RE: Allocations in the 2002 Plan
Mary - Regarding the 100883 and 1000222, Mike Terraso will be meeting with Mr. Horton tomorrow. Regarding 140196, I've attached below the description of the group. Additionally, John Brindle, the cost center owner, mentioned that both Mr. Horton and Phil Lowry are aware of the group's activities and costs.
Please let me know if you need anything further.
Regards,
Elizabeth
Business Controls is responsible for corporate security, including personnel, physical and technical security matters. This involves conducting investigations, setting policies and procedures and working with appropriate security elements within the business units. The group also coordinates and facilitates Enron's crisis response efforts. Finally, it provides business intelligence on selected issues to senior management.
-----Original Message-----
From: Botello, Mary
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Linnell, Elizabeth
Subject: Allocations in the 2002 Plan
Elizabeth,
In the Corp. allocations there are 410,000 dollars budgeted to ETS for cc 100883. Mr. Horton has an agreement that none of the costs from this cc shall be assessed to any of the pipes in ETS. Please have these costs removed from your allocation to ETS. Thank you.
Also, can you provide me some information regarding the costs for cc 100222, Gov't Affairs Environment and cc 140196, Business Controls. We are meeting with Mr. Horton next week and would like to provide him some explanation of the work that makes up these costs. If you could respond by Tuesday, Oct. 9, that would be very helpful. Thank you.
Mary | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
" To dream anything that you want to dream -
that is the beauty of the human mind.
To do anything you want to do -
that is the strength of the human will.
To trust yourself to test your limits -
that is the courage to succeed."
" Embrace hard things and your mind will blossom."
"This is America ENRON. We can do anything here." -- Ted Turner Sunil Dalal
"Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could; some
blunders and absurdities have crept in; forget them
as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day; you shall begin it serenely and
with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your
old nonsense." -Ralph Waldo Emerson
"To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the
affection of children; to earn the appreciation of
honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate
beauty, to find the best in others; to leave the world a little
better; whether by a healthy child, a garden patch or a redeemed social
condition; to know even one life has breathed easier
because you have lived. This is the meaning of success." -Ralph Waldo
Emerson | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Let's talk.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barbarawi, Moe
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:40 PM
To: Edison, Andrew
Cc: Sarkissian, Arshak
Subject: Akamai accelerated.xls
Andrew, per Arshak's request I am sending you the attached spreadsheet for your review.
please give me a call when you have a minute so we can go over what Arshak wants to accomplish.
Arshak is looking to have an addendum to the original Akamai contract to reflect the accelerated payment schedule according to the spreadsheet. please keep in mind that the start/end dates might change
Thanks
Moe
713-853-9395 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Christian,
I received your email when I got back this morning. Yes I had a great
holiday. Hopefully yours was the same. Our Credit group has agreed to
changing the collateral threshold from 10MM to 15MM for both parties. Please
make that change in the contract in section 4.5 in each of the places where
10MM is located, print 2 originals of each, have them signed, and forward to
me for further handling with Enron North America Corp.
"Pfister, Christian W." <[email protected]>
01/02/2001 11:31 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
Mr. Hyvl,
Happy New Year! Hope you enjoyed the holidays. Did you have a chance to
see if we could raise the threshold of $10 million for a Letter of Credit?
(see message below)
-----Original Message-----
From: Pfister, Christian W.
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 1:58 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
I agree. The Accounting Dept. informed me that there are two days that
sometimes land on the 25th that CPS considers a holiday. One is the day
after Thanksgiving and the other is during Fiesta for the Battle of Flowers
Parade. I requested that they just pay a day early if the 25th lands on one
of these CPS holidays.
I have one more request, however. In 4.5. Collateral
Requirement/Termination Payment Threshold, could you raise the threshold of
$10 million for a Letter of Credit to $15 or $20 million (whatever you feel
comforable with)?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
Christian,
I believe this is covered because the language states that if the 25th
is not a
Business Day, the payment will be due the next Business Day. Business Day
is a defined term as a day when the Federal Reserve Banks is New York are
open for business. I cannot agree to a Customer's Business Day because it
is not a defined term and may differ from the standard definition of
Business Day. Therefore that change should not be incorporated. Do you
agree?
"Pfister,
Christian W." To: "'[email protected]'"
<CWPfister@cps <[email protected]>
-satx.com> cc:
Subject: FW: FW: Enfolio
Contract with CPS
12/15/2000
05:48 PM
Mr. Hyvl,
There was one change that you did not make that I requested. It was
difficult to tell since only a single word was bolded.
APPENDIX "1" FINANCIAL MATTERS BILLING, INVOICE DATE, CHARGES AND PAYMENT
"Buyer shall remit any amounts due on the 25th day of the Month in which
Seller's statement was received. If the due date for any payment to be
made
under this Agreement is not a Customer's Business Day, the due date for
such
payment shall be the following Customer's Business Day."
There are very few instances where our Business Day would be different from
your business day. However, as an example, the day after Thanksgiving is a
CPS holiday. This year, we had a gas payment due on that date which we
sent
on the following Monday. This is probably the only holiday CPS has that
your company may not have.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
Christian,
Attached is the modified contract with the changes you requested.
Please print off 2 originals and have them signed. Please fill in the
purchase order number information on the invoices section of Exhibit A. If
the number is not available, them please delete the information requiring
the number from the billing and payment provision. Forward the signed
copies to me or Janet Wallis and we will proceed with execution by ENA.
(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc)
"Pfister,
Christian W." To: "'[email protected]'"
<CWPfister@cps <[email protected]>
-satx.com> cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio
Contract with CPS
12/15/2000
04:16 PM
Unfortunately, we don't have a purchase order issued yet so I can't give
you
a number. I know that would make it easier for you guys, but I don't think
we can issue one until right before the first gas purchase. First, a
purchase requisition needs to be issued. Then, a purchase order will be
released following approvals by the various individuals authorized to sign
off on them.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 4:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: Enfolio Contract with CPS
Christian,
If the purchase order number will be the same for all deals under the
contract, can you give me the number so that I can include it as a part of
your address for Invoices.
(See attached file: CITYPublicServiceSanAntonio.doc) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/20/99 06:39
AM ---------------------------
From: John Ballentine 12/19/99 02:06 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Sherrier/FGT/Enron@ENRON
Subject: First Glance Comparison of CitrusNet Offers
Rod, please find the enclosed first glance comparison of the El Paso offer.
Please fwd this to Rock and Mike Moran after you have read it. As it turned
out, I got diverted to my PNet meeting in Las Vegas, and I plan to be out of
here by mid Monday afternoon. I will call you early Monday morning to
discuss this memo and the offer. Lets plan on an early Tuesday meeting with
Stan/Rock/Mike/you and I? Your call. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI, all new deals that are at NGPL/Nipsco, need to be in sitara at
Nipsco/NGPL. Please shout with any questions.
PL
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
08:56 AM ---------------------------
From: George F Smith 01/23/2001 08:08 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cora Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NGPL Nipsco
Phillip, Please move the following two deals from their current location,
NGPL/Nipsco, to a new location Nipsco/NGPL. We are setting up Nipsco as it's
own pipeline so as to better track positions. Please make the change
effective Feb. 1.
Thanks, George | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI. Good article that Vance Meyer worked on for Net Works.
Kal
-----Original Message-----
From: Meyer, Vance
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 6:39 PM
To: Denne, Karen; Gagliardi, Larry; Haux, Katrin; Ambler, John; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Philipp, Meredith; Piper, Greg; Richter, Brad; Shah, Kal; Beck, Sally; Noland, John; Pickering, Mark
Subject: Darwin 50 article
http://www.darwinmag.com/read/100101/power.html
Pls see article in Darwin.
EOL still has the juice!
Vance | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000
02:25 PM ---------------------------
Daniel Diamond
06/01/2000 07:25 PM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Racicot/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed Quinn
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline Phase 2 requirements
This is just a reminder of some of the items that we discussed. Feel free to
give me a call if you have further questions.
Thanks Again,
-Dan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here are the final Lay slides for Montreal.
- ROB
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2000
08:43 AM ---------------------------
Shant Donabedian 05/22/2000 06:35 PM
To: Andrew Miles/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Ken Lay Presentation - Final
Shant Donabedian | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes, you can flow 100%. I confirmed that this was a part ot the rate case
settlement.
[email protected] on 01/05/2001 09:50:36 AM
To: Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES
cc:
Subject: Re: Contract 571492
In the old days, you could only flow 7/12 of the MDQ from secondary points.
That was when these contracts were good for the whole year. So you are
telling me the "rules have changed"? I can now flow 100% from secondary
points?
[email protected] on 01/05/2001 08:38:35 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Contract 571492
You can use the full contract MDQ to move from and to secondary points. Of
course, this would be subject to any secondary restrictions.
[email protected] on 01/04/2001 04:48:44 PM
To: Ora L. Ash/Clarksburg/CT/CNG@CNGNOTES
cc:
Subject: Contract 571492
We have a FTGSS contract with a MDQ of 40,148 dts. The primary receipt
point on this contract is storage. BUT, we can flow some of this gas from
secondary points like Oakford or the Pools. How much gas can be sourced
from Secondary receipt points? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
congratulations!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 01/18/2000 03:03
PM ---------------------------
Rick Causey@ENRON
01/17/2000 06:04 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Global Risk Management Operations
Recognizing Enron,s increasing worldwide presence in the wholesale energy
business and the need to insure outstanding internal controls for all of our
risk management activities, regardless of location, a global risk management
operations function has been created under the direction of Sally W. Beck,
Vice President. In this role, Sally will report to Rick Causey, Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.
Sally,s responsibilities with regard to Global Risk Management Operations
will mirror those of other recently created Enron global functions. In this
role, Sally will work closely with all Enron geographic regions and wholesale
companies to insure that each entity receives individualized regional support
while also focusing on the following global responsibilities:
1. Enhance communication among risk management operations professionals.
2. Assure the proliferation of best operational practices around the globe.
3. Facilitate the allocation of human resources.
4. Provide training for risk management operations personnel.
5. Coordinate user requirements for shared operational systems.
6. Oversee the creation of a global internal control audit plan for risk
management activities.
7. Establish procedures for opening new risk management operations offices
and create key benchmarks for measuring on-going risk controls.
Each regional operations team will continue its direct reporting relationship
within its business unit, and will collaborate with Sally in the delivery of
these critical items. The Houston-based risk management operations team under
Sue Frusco,s leadership, which currently supports risk management activities
for South America and Australia, will also report directly to Sally.
Sally retains her role as Vice President of Energy Operations for Enron
North America, reporting to the ENA Office of the Chairman. She has been in
her current role over Energy Operations since 1997, where she manages risk
consolidation and reporting, risk management administration, physical product
delivery, confirmations and cash management for ENA,s physical commodity
trading, energy derivatives trading and financial products trading.
Sally has been with Enron since 1992, when she joined the company as a
manager in Global Credit. Prior to joining Enron, Sally had four years
experience as a commercial banker and spent seven years as a registered
securities principal with a regional investment banking firm. She also owned
and managed a retail business for several years.
Please join me in supporting Sally in this additional coordination role for
global risk management operations. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Search Amazon.com for:
We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication Preferences and click the Customer Communication Preferences link. Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: [email protected]
[IMAGE] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Several discussions have been circulating regarding current Enron phone numbers and the need for new toll-free numbers the UBS East Power Group.
For the UBS Power Trading group (EAST):
We can request new toll-free numbers (24 Hour, Fax and Scheduling) as per Kathy Link (UBS Houston 5-5418).
a. Don Baughman and I have discussed a few options for these numbers, but would welcome any input or related requirements you may be aware of prior to us initiating this.
b. We will establish these for East Power ASAP. David Steiner (503-464-3701) will be the contact to facilitate this effort for the West Desk
Our current "853" numbers will probably be replaced by new "584" numbers(Kathy Link is working on this). If this occurs, new numbers will be assigned to us.
Our Current "800" numbers for 24-Hour, "Fax, and Scheduling can be forwarded / transferred by the IT group to the Estate from our current phone turrets.
Let's discuss these numbers tomorrow, Tuesday morning (February 4th).
Thanks,
Corry Bentley
3-0421 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
info on the inspection for draw # 19 i/a/o $289,056.53.
By the way congratulations on your new position as CEO with Enron.
-----Original Message-----
From:?? Temica Lacy
Sent:?? Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:46 AM
To:???? Fernando Parra
Cc:???? Shelly Lambert
Subject:??????? Jeffrey Skilling/#10386513
Have received the inspection back and the following has been noted:
1. Carpet (scheduled value $35,000.00) drawing $15,750.00.? Not completed.?
No credit given.
CO #21
1. Hardware (scheduled value $42,164.11) Just started to install.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Temica Lacy
ext.1695
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
************************************************************************
The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission
is confidential. It may also be privileged work product or proprietary
information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other
than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because
of this information is strictly prohibited.
************************************************************************ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
When: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: eb3270
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Attendees: Sally Beck
Kim Theriot
Joe Hunter
Bryce Baxter
Bob Hall
Mechelle Stevens
Leslie Reeves
James Scribner
Mary Solmonson | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please add to the list as number three. Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 05:25 PM -----
Peter Keohane
Sent by: Sharon Crawford
10/26/2000 04:33 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Top Legal Risks
Mark, on reflection, I think that there is currently only one legal risk
within Enron Canada that would warrant being added to the top legal risks for
ENA, which is the Alberta Sundance "B" PPA acquired in the Alberta PPA
auction in August, 2000.
I would suggest the description attached.
Regards,
Peter
Janette Elbertson
10/24/2000 08:47 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Top Legal Risks
Mark Haedicke requested I forward the attached document to you.
Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone: (713) 853-7906
Fax: (713) 646-2600
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark:
Please review the attached Credit Schedule from Dow. Given that our trade
flow with them has increased to date and is expected to further accelerate, I
agree with you totally that we need to finalise the ISDA.
Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
04:14 AM ---------------------------
"Corbett, Cheryl (CE)" <[email protected]> on 02/22/2001 07:11:13 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Antuna, Luis (L)" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: ISDA TDCC/Enron
Doug, attached for your review and comment is the draft ISDA Schedule we
recently forwarded to Adam Gross. Please forward any comments directly to
Luis Antuna at [email protected] or by telephone at 517-638-6789.
Regards,
Cheryl Corbett
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antuna, Luis (L)
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:59 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: Billings, Mike (ME); Corbett, Cheryl (CE)
> Subject: ISDA TDCC/Enron
>
> Mike Billings has given us your name as the first contact person in Enron
> to negotiate an ISDA agreement with The Dow Chemical Company (TDCC). Our
> files show an ISDA between Enron Capital & Trade Resources and two Dow
> entities (Dow Hydrocarbons & Resources, and Dow Chemical Canada). In
> addition to this, my understanding is that TDCC (my predecessor in this
> position) and Enron ( presumably a lawyer) had some discussions about an
> ISDA, but for some reason they were not successful. Despite this, the
> level of trading between the two companies have increased and TDCC has
> never accepted and cannot accept the Terms and Conditions included in the
> confirmations sent by Enron. For these reasons, we think we should agree
> on an ISDA where conditions acceptable to both parties can apply to the
> intense trading between the two companies.
>
> In order to speed up the process, I have enclosed to this message Dow's
> template for the ISDA Schedule. We would appreciate if Enron could review
> the attached draft and come back with any comments or issues for
> discussion. Please forward this message to the responsible person asking
> him to contact me for any discussion. Thanks.
>
> Regards
>
> <<Enron North America Corp.(draft) 2-9-01.doc>>
>
>
> Luis Antuna
> Attorney - Financial Law
> The Dow Chemical Company
> 2030 Dow Center
> Midland, MI 48674
> Tel: (517) 638-6789
> Fax: (517) 636-0861
> [email protected]
>
- Enron North America Corp.(draft) 2-9-01.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hope you can make it
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Jessica Rossman
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:20 PM
To: info
Subject: RaceCarClub 2001 Party - Friday October 5 - www.racecarclub.net
Rev up your engines and prepare for an evening built for speed...
The RaceCarClub and QUIERO PISCO invite you to the third annual RaceCarClub
party co-hosted for the first time with the Texaco/Havoline Grand Prix,
Friday, October 5, 2001, from 8:00 p.m. until 1:00 a.m. at the historic Rice
Lofts.
Celebrate Houston's 2001 Texaco/Havoline Grand Prix with the velocity for
which the RaceCarClub is known, as QUIERO PISCO and a revved up roster of
Houston's own social racing hosts steer the RaceCarClub fun at the Rice that
evening.
The Empire Room will feature Houston's own and 2001 Houston Press Best New
Artist nominee Arthur Yoria (www.arthuryoria.com), along with the El Orbits
on the balcony and a plethora of some of downtown's hottest DJ's in the
Crystal Ballroom and five open bars with free flowing bottomless cocktails
featuring Houston hottest new Latin import, QUIERO PISCO.
Fashionable attire is a requisite, along with your all-inclusive entrance
fee ($35 pre-sale on-line or Market Price as available at the door). To
help those effected by the bearish economy, this year we are offering a
reduced price of $25 for the first 500 tickets sold - so act fast and save a
few bucks.
A portion of the evening's proceeds will be donated to the Muscular
Dystrophy Association.
To make your evening and pocket stretch a little further, this year your
RaceCarClub pass waives the cover charge at the following downtown bars the
evening of the event:
* Club 511 * Grasshopper * Prague
* 410 Shot Bar * Mercury Room * Spy
To buy your tickets or for more information, please visit our web site at
www.racecarclub.net. If you have any questions and/or comments please feel
free to contact Martin Productions, Inc. at [email protected] or
713-223-9500. Please forward this email along to others that might enjoy the
evening.
RaceCarClub is brought to you by QUIERO PISCO, Houston's newest spirit
imported from Latin America for your partying pleasure.
-----------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[email protected]
with
UNSUBSCRIBE QPINFO
in the BODY of the message.
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. If you
believe this communication is inappropriate or offensive, please contact
Ocean Energy`s Human Resources Department. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 07:43 AM
---------------------------
Robert B Cass
02/21/2001 05:33 PM
To: EOL North America Traders
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NOTICE TO ALL ENRONONLINE TRADERS
Before you begin trading your EnronOnline products on March 1st ...
Review the dates on your products.
We are in the process of converting "regular" products to "Tokenized
Reference Period" Products.
A Tokenized Reference period product is one which the system sees as "Day
Ahead", "Month Ahead", "Month Ahead +1", etc - but this is not what you or
your customers see. At midnight every night, the system checks the current
date and then CHANGES the dates shown on the Product Description. For
example, if Product #20451 is "Month+1", then on Feb. 28, the Short
Description on the Website and in Stack Manager would show "April1-30".
However, on March 1, the system will automatically change the date of Product
#20451 to show "May1-31". Note that the Product number stays the same, but
the date has automatically updated.
When all of your Products use Tokenized Reference Periods, this works fine -
your links all stay on the same relative date (links are between Product
Numbers, not between Product Short Descriptions, so as the date changes, it
might look like your links are changing, but in fact they have stayed on the
same Product all the time - only the date changed).
Believe it or not, changing to Tokenized Reference Periods will make your
life easier in the long run - you will not have to continually create new
Products and links. Links between Products which share the same dates should
continue in effect as the dates of both the Parent and Child change together.
The important thing to remember here is that for monthly Products which have
Rolling Tokenized Reference Periods, the dates will continue to change
automatically on the 1st day of each new month.
For example:
On Feb. 28, the "Prompt Month" product will be March; but on March 1, it will
become April, etc.
On Feb. 28, the "Prompt +1 Month" product will be April; but on March 1, it
will become May. etc.
To verify if your product has a Tokenized Reference Period or if it has a
specific date, please review your product in Product Manager under the 1st
tab marked "Product Details." Your product will be "Tokenized" if it has
the following applications:
There will be a check mark in the box after "Lifespan Tokenized?"
The term "Prompt Month" or "Prompt Month +1" will be displayed in the next
scroll-down box.
If you have any questions about the set-up of your products, please contact
the following members of the EnronOnline Product Control Group:
Rob Cass x 35491
Kevin Meredith x 39555
Melba Lozano x 58986
Chris Walker x 37533 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jason:
Per my voice mail message here are some of the Swiss Re documents in the
event that you can join me at 2 tomorrow.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 05:31 PM -----
Brando Hayden
05/30/2000 02:10 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Swiss Re agreement
Carol,
here are copies of the ELRIX Website Terms and Conditions and the ELRIX
Weather Derivatives Privacy Policy. I will go ahead and set up a meeting.
Thanks and take care,
Brando | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi - am speaking with an inhouse PUHCA lawyer
-----Original Message-----
From: "Sternberg, Michelle" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Yaish, Yair
Subject: FW: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA
Sara -
I spoke with Yair about your suggestion to have a "unilateral" approach to
include Affiliates for yourselves but not for us since we are restricted by
PUHCA (as explained by Anthony Wilson, our in house regulatory attorney) and
he is inclined to not agree to your request (our approach is either if
applied to both of us or neither of us).
Let me know if you need to discuss this further - in which case we will get
on a call (Yair, you and myself) to discuss.
Regards,
Michelle
-----Original Message-----
From: Sternberg, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:18 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Yaish, Yair
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA
Sara -
I have spoken with our in-house regulatory specialist and she has informed
me that we cannot agree to include our regulated or non-regulated Affiliates
in Set Off under the Public Utility Holding Company Act without getting
approval from the SEC.
Please advise if we can proceed on the ISDA with carving out Affiliates in
Set Off, as per our original request.
Regards,
Michelle
Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711
-----Original Message-----
From: Sternberg, Michelle
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Yaish, Yair
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA
Sara -
I am checking internally if we can agree to the below. I will get back to
you in the beginning of next week.
Regards,
Michelle
Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA
Michelle:
With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff
for your non-regulated affiliates. Perhaps you could provide us with the
regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out. I look forward to hearing from
you. Regards.
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490
-----Original Message-----
From: "Sternberg, Michelle" <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm
[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Heard, Marie
Subject: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA
Sara -
As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline
incorporating
the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of ISDA
(modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions). The attached is
the
last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would
suggest
that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of agreement
since it is the final version.
<<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>>
Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at
which
point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature
page)
via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the
Schedule with your revised Schedule.
Thank you for your patience.
Regards,
Michelle
- ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED
9.26.01.doc >>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Change of mailing address:
49 bancroft mills unit 2J
wilmington DE 19806
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Gioffre
[email protected]
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
That's so weird. Prentice left her car door ajar (when she went to go to
school yesterday morning, it was dead and she had to get a jump).
I was surprised that the phone was only 300 pesos. I thought they'd charge
by the minute, but apparently, it's a flat 10 pesos for local (i.e., 800
calls), no matter how long one's one.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
04/03/2001 04:00 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Domaine
I left the car light on - battery totally dead! Freezing cold in SF - no
coats - landed at 9 pm - home at 12:30 am. ugh!!! 300 pesos is just the El
Cid part of the bill - I think the rest will be on your card. Eldon
actually got them to adjust some of that off as well cuz he said your
connection kept going off. I say "If only life always gave us credits when
our connections went off!"
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine
we got back ok. (i didn't know tulsa had such a neat airport.)
Nancy Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To:
"'[email protected]'"
ndavi.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
04/03/2001 03:50 PM Subject: RE: Domaine
you don't want to know
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine
The entire phone bill is 300 pesos??? Yes, please fax to me. And please
email me rest of expenses when you get a chance so I can write you a check
for everything (plane,phone, golf, etc., etc.)
You guys get back OK? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 12:57 PM -----
"Dautenhahn, Kimberly" <[email protected]>
04/16/2001 11:49 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement
Sara,
I apologize for the delay in getting the signed Agreement back to you. We
are waiting to receive it back from our Zurich office (unfortunately the
person required to sign has been out). We should have faxed signature pages
(which we can, in turn, fax to you) at some point tomorrow. In addition, we
should be able to get you your original copy later this week.
Regards,
Kimberly
Kimberly A. Dautenhahn
Transaction Management
Corporate Advisory Division
Lehman Brothers
(646) 836-2011/0609 (fax)
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers Inc. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to
be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this
information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
such. All information is subject to change without notice. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steven has been asked to fly to Washington today.? Because of the conflict
in meetings there, he has requested this conference call be cancelled until
next week.? Once we have rescheduled, we will contact you with the
information for dialing in.? Thank you for your patience and the changes we
have had to make this week.? .?
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Kelly [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Steven Kelly; William Hall; Ward Scobee; Tony Wetzel; Tom Heller; Ted
Cortopassi; Sue Mara; Steve Ponder; Steve Iliff; Ross Ain; Roger Pelote;
Robert Frees; Rob Lamkin; Rich Dyer; Pete Levitt; Paula Soos; Paul Wood; Nam
Nguyen; Milton Schultz; Marty McFadden; Lucian Fox; Kent Palmerton; Ken
Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall; Joe Ronan; Joe Greco; Jeff Dasovich; Jack
Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg Blue; Frank Misseldine; Eric Eisenman; Ed Tomeo; Ed
Maddox; Duane Nelsen; Doug Levitt; Doug Fernley; Dean Gosselin; Curt Hatton;
Cody Carter; Carolyn Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill Woods; Bill Carlson; Mark
Smith
Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones; Katie Kaplan; Carol Hudson; Andy Brown
Subject: Re: Conference Call Scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Friday, Jan 12 To
Discuss FERC Market Power Mitigation Technical Conference
Oops.? Forgot attachment.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Kelly
To: William Hall ; Ward Scobee ; Tony Wetzel ; Tom Heller ; Ted Cortopassi
; Sue Mara ; Steve Ponder ; Steve Iliff ; Ross Ain ; Roger Pelote ; Robert
Frees ; Rob Lamkin ; Rich Dyer ; Pete Levitt ; Paula Soos ; Paul Wood ; Nam
Nguyen ; Milton Schultz ; Marty McFadden ; Lucian Fox ; Kent Palmerton ; Ken
Hoffman ; Jonathan Weisgall ; Joe Ronan ; Joe Greco ; Jeff Dasovich ; Jack
Pigott ; Hap Boyd ; Greg Blue ; Frank Misseldine ; Eric Eisenman ; Ed
Tomeo ; Ed Maddox ; Duane Nelsen ; Doug Levitt ; Doug Fernley ; Dean
Gosselin ; Curt Hatton ; Cody Carter ; Carolyn Baker ; Bob Escalante ; Bill
Woods ; Bill Carlson ; Mark Smith
Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones ; Katie Kaplan ; Carol Hudson ; Steven Kelly ; Andy
Brown
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:43 PM
Subject: Conference Call Scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Friday, Jan 12 To
Discuss FERC Market Power Mitigation Technical Conference
IEP has scheduled a conference call for 9:00 a.m. (PST) on Friday, Jan 12 .?
The purpose of the conference call will be to brief/discuss this weeks
events, including the Governor's State of the State speech delineating his
new energy policy, and the discussions in Washington D.C./FERC on forward
contracting, etc.
?
In addition, we will discuss the?upcoming FERC Market Power Mitigation
Technical Conference.? Attached is a "strawman" developed by EPSA for
consideration.
?
?
The Call-In Number is??? ??? ??? 888/271-0949
The Participant Code is??? ????? 111756 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John,
Thanks. Stinson will be able to join us for dinner. He is opting out of
the paper due to his big workload but we can get his perspective on
the last 8 years he spent at Enron.
Vince
"John D. Martin" <[email protected]> on 11/28/2000 09:44:17 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: 2001 FMA European Conference
Here's the info on the European conference. Just for your files.
John
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:40:39 -0500
>From: Karen Wright <[email protected]>
>Subject: 2001 FMA European Conference
>To: [email protected]
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
>X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
>
>2001 FMA European Conference
>
>The Fifth Annual European Meeting of the Financial Management
>Association International (FMA) will be held May 31 and June 1, 2001 at
>the Hotel Sofitel (Rive Gauche) in Paris, France. FMA,s European
>Meeting brings together academicians and practitioners with interests in
>financial decision-making. The meeting provides a forum for presenting
>new research and discussing current issues in financial management,
>investments, financial markets and institutions, and related topics.
>Keynote addresses and other special presentations will be held in
>addition to research paper presentations.
>
>Paper Submissions
>Research Papers. The program includes traditional research paper
>presentations. Criteria used to determine the suitability of these
>papers for the program include the nature of the research problem,
>implications of the proposed research, the quality of the research
>design, and the expected contribution of the research to the
>literature. Please note that the purpose of these sessions is to
>present new and unpublished research.
>
>Submission Fee. There is no submission fee for the FMA European
>Conference.
>
>Submissions. Please follow these steps:
>Complete the Presentation Form that can be downloaded at
>www.fma.org/paris.htm. Carefully select the subject code on the
>Presentation Form that most closely describes your research. The code
>number you select will be used to select reviewers for your proposal.
>
>Send six (6) copies of your completed paper, along with the completed
>Presentation Form, to the FMA office (Financial Management Association,
>University of South Florida, College of Business Administration, Tampa
>FL 33620-5500, USA).
>Please note that only completed papers will be accepted for the FMA
>European Conference review process.
>
>The paper submission deadline is Friday, December 1, 2000.
>
>You will receive an electronic confirmation of your submission within
>six weeks of its receipt by the FMA office, and you will be notified of
>the results of the reviewing process by the middle of February, 2001.
>
>Competitive Paper Awards
>The Financial Management Association International is pleased to
>announce that four (4) $1,500 awards will be presented in conjunction
>with the 2001 FMA European Conference. The "Young Scholars" award will
>be presented to the best paper authored by a Ph.D. student (or
>equivalent) or recent Ph.D. (or equivalent) graduate. Three additional
>$1,500 awards will be presented to the papers deemed "Best of the Best"
>by the members of the 2001 FMA European Conference Competitive Paper
>Awards committee. Please note that these awards will be made only if, in
>the opinion of the FMA Awards Committee, a paper warrants such a
>decision. The decisions of the FMA Awards Committee are final.
>
>Accepted Papers. If your proposal is accepted, the version of the paper
>you submit will be sent to its discussant as soon as he/she is
>identified. You are obligated to send the final version of your paper to
>the discussant and session chair by April 27, 2001. You also are
>obligated to present your paper in a professional manner at the assigned
>FMA program session.
>
>The collegiality of the meeting provides a very special opportunity for
>participants to share their work and to hear about the work others are
>doing. Thus, individuals whose papers are accepted for presentation at
>the 2001 FMA European Conference will be expected to either chair a
>session or discuss a paper.
>
>Program Co-Chairs
>
>Francois Degeorge
>HEC Paris
>1 rue de la Lib,ration
>78351 Jouy en Josas Cedex
>France
>33-1-39-67-72-34 (ph)
>33-1-39-67-94-34 (fax)
>[email protected]
>
>Kent Womack
>Dartmouth College
>Amos Tuck School
>Hanover, NH 03755
>1 603 646 2806 (ph)
>1 603 646 1308 (fax)
>[email protected]
>
>Additional Opportunities For Participation
>
>Session Chairperson or Discussant. If you wish to serve as the
>chairperson of a session or paper discussant, but are not submitting a
>paper, please complete the Participation Form which can be downloaded
>from www.fma.org/paris.htm. Submit the completed form to the FMA office
>by December 1, 2000. Session organization will take place in March,
>2001.
>
>Deadline Summary
>
>Completed Papers: December 1, 2000
>Chairperson/Discussant Requests: December 1, 2000
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
[email protected]
web: http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 02:48 PM
---------------------------
Brian Hoskins
09/15/2000 12:51 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Flag Football Schedule (Again)
The City League has once again revised our schedule. Hopefully, this will be
the last time. In case you're wondering why we play the Jay Ballers, the
team we beat last week, three times during the season and the Raiders only
once, don't ask me. The Raiders, however, are a much better team, so that
should work to our advantage.
Have a good weekend,
Brian
All games are on Wednesday nights at Jaycee Park ballfield
9/6 Bye
9/13 8pm vs. Jay Ballers (W 13-7)
9/20 7pm vs. Organized Confusion
9/27 7pm vs. Raiders
10/4 7pm vs. Dawgs (Enron)
10/11 9pm vs. Jay Ballers
10/18 7pm vs. Jay Ballers
10/25 9pm vs. Organized Confusion
11/1 9pm vs. Dawgs (Enron)
Directions to Jaycee Park ballfield (NW)
1300 Seamist @ Grovewood
Go out the West Loop N (610) to W. 18th Street.
Exit W. 18th Steet, go right
Take right on Seamis, follow to the park | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mary: Please let me know what happens. All calculations should be made as
of a specific date. Sara
Mary Cook
08/02/2000 01:12 PM
To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ParPak
See the attached proposed letter for ParPak. I need the rest of the
calculations, the Value of the Posted Credit Support as of the Valuation Date
and the difference. Do you normally have the trader review this type of
letter prior to sending? I think we should in this instance. I expect
ParPak to reply with a request for a Return Amount. As this occurs, please
let me draft that letter as well. Thank you.
I will finalize the letter for you when I get the calculations. Any
questions, please call. Mary | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Rick and David,
Also give me your analysis wherein the Counterparty receivable financing is more generic, without specific references to contracts but a global reference to receivables in connection with a product type, and assume representations by Counterparty to Bank that do not include setoff rights as any type of "permitted encumbrance or charge." Would the Bank still be put on reasonable inquiry vis a vis the Enron position?
-----Original Message-----
From: Cook, Mary
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal); '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: Setoff and ISDA Section 7(b) Transfer Provision; Comments on New Draft of Master Netting
Item 1. Please refer to Section 7, particularly 7(b), of the ISDA form regarding transfer of receivables and the following setoff language from our schedule.
(g) Setoff. (A) Upon the designation or deemed designation of an Early Termination Date the Non-defaulting Party or the non-Affected Party (in either case, "X") may, at its option and in its discretion, setoff, against any amounts Owed to the Defaulting Party or Affected Party (in either case, "Y") in Dollars or any other currency by X or any Affiliate of X under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s), any amounts Owed in Dollars or any other currency by Y to X or any of X's Affiliates (irrespective of place of payment or booking office of the obligation) under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s). The obligations of Y and X under this Agreement in respect of such amounts shall be deemed satisfied and discharged to the extent of any such setoff exercised by X and/or X's Affiliates. X will give Y notice of any setoff effected under this Section as soon as practicable after the setoff is effected provided that failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of the setoff. For purposes of this Section, "Owed" shall mean any amounts owed or otherwise accrued and payable (regardless of whether such amounts have been or could be invoiced) as of the Early Termination Date.
Amounts subject to the setoff permitted in this Section may be converted by X into any currency in which any obligation Owed is denominated at the rate of exchange at which X, acting in a reasonable manner and in good faith, would be able to purchase the relevant amount of the currency being converted. If an obligation is unascertained, X may in good faith estimate that obligation and setoff in respect of the estimate, subject to the relevant party accounting to the other when the obligation is ascertained. Nothing in this Section shall be effective to create a charge or other security interest except as may be provided under applicable law. This setoff provision shall be without limitation and in addition to any right of setoff, netting, offset, combination of accounts, counterclaim, lien or other right to which X or any of X's Affiliates is at any time otherwise entitled (whether by operation of law, contract or otherwise). Each of the parties represents and acknowledges that the rights set forth in this Section are an integral part of this Agreement between the parties and that without such rights the parties would not be willing to enter into Transactions. Each of the parties further acknowledges that it is executing this Agreement on behalf of itself as principal and, with respect to this Section, as agent on behalf of its Affiliates, which Affiliates shall receive the benefits of this Section and otherwise be bound as if such Affiliates had directly signed this Agreement as it relates to this Section.
(B) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party, as the case may be, shall not be required to pay to the Defaulting Party or Affected Party any amount under Section 6(e) until the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party receives confirmation satisfactory to it in its reasonable discretion (which may include an opinion of its counsel) that all other obligations of any kind whatsoever (whether pursuant to Specified Indebtedness as defined herein or otherwise) of the Defaulting Party or Affected Party to make any payments to the Non-defaulting Party or non-Affected Party or any of its Affiliates under this Agreement or under any other agreement(s), instrument(s) or undertaking(s), which are Owed as of the Early Termination Date hereof have been fully and finally satisfied.
The following are three areas of questions.
A. Should a Counterparty effect an assignment of receivables under Section 7(b) for a financing to Bank, what is Enron's "priority" position (assuming Bank has filed a financing statement)? Is the analysis below correct?
1. Bank takes receivable assignment under contract subject to Enron setoff rights because Bank would be held to actual knowledge of the express setoff right in the contract under which it is taking the receivables.
2. Is there any method by which the Bank can prime Enron (assuming Enron has made no public filings) without Enron's written consent?
B. Assume a master netting agreement is in place. I believe our assignment provisions protect us and are more prohibitive than the ISDA; however, we may want to expressly cite assignment of receivables rather than the master agreement and transactions "as security". Please review and advise of any particular language you think should be added.
C. Do you have any suggested language that we might add to the form 7(b) provision via our schedule, or is it necessary? For example, adding at the end of 7(b), ";provided, any such assignment shall be made expressly subject [and subordinate] to this Agreement, including, without limitation, all rights of [ENA] under Section 6 and [reference setoff section]."
Item 2. Can I get any other comments on the revised draft of master netting agreement?
Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Another bit of background re Frankfurt (see below). I would be a little bit
more insistent on German Consulate support than Herr Sturm suggests
(otherwise this could become a black hole for your time).
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/30/99 09:40
AM ---------------------------
"Sturm, Michael" <[email protected]> on 08/10/99 11:35:23 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder <[email protected]>
cc: "Thomas Geisel (E-Mail)" <[email protected]>, "John Thompson (E-Mail)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: AW: Houston-Frankfurt
Dear Mr. Kean:
I would like to thank you and Mark Schroeder very much for your time and
outstanding hospitality in Houston. I very much enjoyed meeting with you
and your message, that your Chairman Kenneth Lay confirmed for dinner with
our Mayor Petra Roth was very well received and we are all very excited and
looking forward to November 30.
However it raises great interest in the question of organization of the
dinner and the additional participating chairpeople of other companies. Will
Enron now invite for that dinner, which I understand will be the gathering
of 10-12 major decision makers in the energy field? If you could be so kind
as to share with us the thoughts of Ken Lay%s office with regards to that
point, or give me a contact there, I would very much appreciate.
An alternative we discussed or as an addition the next day (Lunch), would be
that a business-group would host an event, which could include a wider
audience of business people of Houston. After having spoken with the German
Consulate in Houston and with the German American Chamber here, it
unfortunately appears as if they will not be capable for s.th. we achieve.
Everybody recommended to work with the reputative Greater Houston
Partnership, whose President was on vacation last week. I would welcome any
assistance in getting us in contact with them. Probably it would not take
too many efforts for Enron, to have them consider supporting out idea of
promoting our ideas. To help you pass them, I again include our plan for
Houston (see attached doc).
I will be in contact with your colleague Mark Palmer with regards to the
press-coverage. Thank you for your response to your earliest possible
convenience.
Yours Sincerely
Michael Sturm
Wirtschaftsf"rderung Frankfurt-
Frankfurt Economic Development GmbH
Hanauer Landstr. 182d
60314 Frankfurt am Main
Tel: +011 49 69 212-38764
Fax: +011 49 69 212-36230
E-Mail: [email protected]
http://www.frankfurt-business.de
-----Urspr_ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Steven J Kean [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet am: Samstag, 7. August 1999 00:30
An: [email protected]
Cc: Mark Schroeder
Betreff:
Ken Lay is confirmed for dinner with the mayor on the evening of November
30.
- Houstonplan.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:14 PM ---------------------------
Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
04/27/2001 01:00 PM
To: Allison Horton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amir Baig/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandon Bangerter/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Ellis/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Philpott/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris P Wood/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Tull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave June/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Sutton/NA/Enron@Enron, Felicia Buenrostro/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Johnna Morrison/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Dorn/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn Schultea/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leon McDowell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leticia Barrios/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Milton Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Raj Perubhatla/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shekar Komatireddy/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie O'Brian/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bonne Castellano/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gwynn Gorsuch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jo Ann Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, LaQuitta Washington/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Lighthill/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Valeria A Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlotte Brown/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Fain/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Fitch/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Anna Harris/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristi Monson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie McNiel/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Stabler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Prince/NA/Enron@Enron, James Gramke/NA/Enron@ENRON, Blair Hicks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Johnson/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Little/Enron@EnronXGate, Dale Lukert/NA/Enron@ENRON, Donald Martin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew Mattei/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darvin Mitchell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Oldham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wesley Pearson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ramon Pizarro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Natalie Rau/NA/Enron@ENRON, William Redick/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark A Richardson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Schnieders/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gary Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron, Delaney Trimble/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Upton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Boegler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lyndel Click/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Franco/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Gross/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Arthur Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny Jones/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Ogden/Houston/Eott@Eott, Edgar Ponce/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Pursifull/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lance Stanley/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monique Sanchez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Potter/NA/Enron@Enron, Natalie Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Calcagno/NA/Enron@Enron, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Collins/HOU/EES@EES, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Loocke/ENRON@enronXgate, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shanna Boudreaux/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gabriel Fuzat/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jack Netek/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lam Nguyen/NA/Enron@Enron, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica Hangach/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Kathy Gagel/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Lisa Goulart/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Ruth Balladares/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Sid Strutt/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL
Current Notes User:
To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration. Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey. When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply' button then hit 'Send' Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.
Thank you.
Outlook 2000 Migration Team
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full Name:
Login ID:
Extension:
Office Location:
What type of computer do you have? (Desktop, Laptop, Both)
Do you have a PDA? If yes, what type do you have: (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada)
Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?
If yes, who?
Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?
If yes, who?
Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
If yes, who?
Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
If yes, who?
Do you have access to a shared calendar?
If yes, which shared calendar?
Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)?
If yes, please list here:
Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:
In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know:
What are your normal work hours? From: To:
Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
If so, when? From (MM/DD/YY): To (MM/DD/YY): | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Louise,
Imbedded in these allocations are several functions for which EIM receives 100% dedicated resources (legal, HR, PR, etc.). Every 100% dedicated resource should be presented in its own RC -- in that way it becomes "controllable" and measurable. Today it is buried in an indirect allocation. This approach will isolate the truly indirect allocations and allow us to better manage the amount and appropriateness of these expenses. We plan to push this topic with respect to all allocations which hit EIM from Enron Americas, Enron Networks, or Enron Corp. Kent Castleman (EIM CAO) is going to discuss this approach with Wes.
Regards,
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Fallon, Jim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Beck, Sally; Leff, Dan; Garland, Kevin; Dodson, Keith; Schiesser, Heath
Cc: Colwell, Wes
Subject: Budget allocations for COOa
As you know the budget planning cycle is upon us. Several of the support functions role up under Enron Americas and then are billed out to the other Business Units. I would encourage all of you to look at the initial allocations below you receive from each of these Support Functions in order to verify that you are satisfied with the planned charges to your accounts.
Wes's group can provide you with this information.
I will be meeting with the Support Groups over the next week and should you wish me to raise any issues on your behalf please let me know or please contact the group leaders directly.
As you can see from the Enron Americas allocation, I am hoping to make substantial changes to our numbers which reflect a substantially large increase from last year.
Regards
Louise
<< File: plan estimates.xls >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
01:04 PM ---------------------------
"Edward Krapels" <[email protected]> on 10/18/2000 04:28:20 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ESAI Gas/Power Alert on Impact of Gas Prices on Generation Investment
Attached is an essay of the impact of gas prices on generation investment.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me.
Ed
____________________
Edward N. Krapels, PhD
Managing Director
ESAI Power and Gas Services
tel 781 245 2036
cell 617 899 4948
[email protected]
www.esai.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hesco is showing a price of $2.85 for tne 29 & 30
Daren J Farmer
11/15/2000 10:33 AM
To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue
Charlene,
We should not have scheduled any volume for the 29-30th. No price was
negotiated that I can find. However, since gas did flow, I rolled the last
price on the deal to cover those days. What price is Hesco showing?
D
Charlene Richmond
11/09/2000 01:37 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue
Daren would you look at the price for 29 and 30th of March 2000 . There are
no prices for these days but volume was scheduled for these days.
Thanks
Charlene
Daren J Farmer
11/02/2000 02:59 PM
To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue
Charlene,
Deal #214948 already had volume and price for the 12th and 13th. You may
need to have the volumes updated by Volume Management.
I added the 15th and 16th to the deal ticket.
D
Charlene Richmond
11/01/2000 04:02 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue
Help . Steve Mauch at Hesco is wanting an answer ASAP
---------------------- Forwarded by Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------
Vance L Taylor
11/01/2000 02:45 PM
To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Another HESCO Issue
Charlene,
This gas purchase is not a part of the wellhead portfolio but is being traded
on the Texas desk. I would suggest you get with Darren Farmer or someone on
the desk.
Sorry I could not be of more assistance!
vlt
x3-6353
Charlene Richmond
11/01/2000 08:22 AM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Another HESCO Issue
Meter 986725 for March 2000. Per Hesco both traders are gone at (Hesco and
Enron) and they (Hesco) were not paid the correct price in March on the
days mentioned below. Hesco cannot find where the price for these days were
recorded. Per Hesco they were underpaid by $32,101.57. Hesco is wanting to
come to our office to have a meeting about clearing this up. It will be nice
if we don't have to meet with them.
Production dates are Volume price they are
looking for
03/12
2,029 2.65
03/13
2,009 2.65
03/15
2,022 2.71
03/16
1,976 2.72 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vince, Stinson, looks like just me and Jim Irvine attending this one may
suffice since this is a working group meeting. As the note describes below,
there will be a separate trip for you guys and me to determine long-term
involvement, etc... Let me now when to schedule.
Vince and Stinson may want to
wait until KC Claffy or I can visit Portland, or have several Enron
reps visit San Diego for demos and related discussions.
Ravi.
----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/29/00 01:28
PM -----
[email protected]
02/29/00 09:18 AM
To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: [[email protected]: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)]
Ravi,
Hi, Amy forwarded me your note. Since Thursday is the kick off
discussions for the new working group, it might not be the ideal venue
for Enron to get acquainted with CAIDA. Vince and Stinson may want to
wait until KC Claffy or I can visit Portland, or have several Enron
reps visit San Diego for demos and related discussions.
We have been talking to Stan Hanks for some time about Enron's
interests in passive measurement and are in the process of implementing
some of the performance features in CoralReef that he has described as
relevant to Enron. Examples of existing CoralReef analyses on OC3/12
links can be found at:
https://anala.caida.org/CoralReef/Demos/cerfnet/link/
(real-time)
https://anala.caida.org/AIX/
(post-processed traces)
We are also working to better tune the skitter tool for reachability
analysis and for use by providers, an example of some existing
analyses can be found at
http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/Summary/sjc.skitter.caida.org/20000227/
For end-to-end measurements, including those relating to service level
guarantees, we are working to make skping and sktrace more useful to
providers and their NOC personnel, see
http://www.caida.org/Tools/Skitter/skping/
Another tool of relevance to providers is our cflowd which analyzes
flow export data from Cisco routers, see
http://www.caida.org/Tools/cflowd/.
We would appreciate the opportunity to talk with Enron personnel about
how to make these tools more relevant and useful to your needs,
however, it is doubtful that we will have time to discuss specific
tools on Thursday.
We look forward to meeting you soon!
Take care,
Tracie Monk
Director, CAIDA
858/822-0943
---------- Forwarded message ----------
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:52:00 -0600
Subject: Re: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)
Hi Amy, Jim Irvine (EBS head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, EBS
Research) will attend the meeting. We will have our assistances (Christine
Blair
& Kristy Carnes, respectively) arrange the trip. We will plan to come in the
night before and return on March 2,00.
Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gibner
(VP, Enron Research) may also attend. They will let me know shortly if they
plan to attend.
Regards,
Ravi.
P.S. Our company name has been changed to Enron Broadband Services
Kristy, Christine please make the appropriate travel arrangements. The place,
time, etc. are listed.
|--------+----------------------->
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | 02/24/00 |
| | 07:07 PM |
| | |
|--------+----------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications |
| cc:
|
| Subject: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00
(fwd) |
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hi Ravi,
I wanted to follow up directly with you and see if you or anyone at Enron
had any interest in participating in the proposed CAIDA "Metrics" working
group meeting?
Please let me know.
Amy E. Blanchard
CAIDA
%%%%%%%%%%%%%
e-mail: [email protected]
phone: (858) 534-8338
fax: (858) 534-5117
B. WG Charters, Meeting on 2 Mar 00
I believe that we should instead run a single CAIDA Working Group
on 'Network Metrics,' rather than the two proposed earlier. My draft
of its charter is appended below. It focuses on producing educational
material about network measurement, and on developing new metrics - these
were the two areas of greatest interest amongst the CAIDA members.
The WG co-chairs are
Sue Moon (SprintLabs) and Brett Watson (MFN/Abovenet)
You are invited to attend the first WG meeting.
The agenda is as follows ..
Agenda for CAIDA WG meeting on: Thursday 2 Mar 00
-----------------
10 am - 4 pm, AboveNet, Downtown SJC (see below for details)
------------ ------------
1. Review WG Charter
- Is it reasonable as set out in the draft?
- What should be removed or added?
2. Work through revised charter in detail
- Identify the work required for each part
- Determine who's willing to work on it
- Attempt to determine delivery times
3. Discussion of new metrics
- First attempt at making a list of metrics to be considered
4. Anything else ?
Location: AboveNet is located in the Knight-Ridder Building,
attached to the Fairmont Hotel complex. The address is
50 W. San Fernando St.
San Jose, CA 95113
RSVP: To help us with organising the meeting, please send email to
[email protected] telling us how many will attend from
your organisation.
Cheers, Nevil
-------------------------------------------------------------
Nevil Brownlee Visiting Researcher
Phone: (619) 822 0893 CAIDA, San Diego
CAIDA Network Metrics Working Group: Draft Charter, Tue 23 Feb 00
Goals:
1 Education
+ FAQ on What does 'measuring the Internet actually mean?'
- Why measure anyway?
- What can be measured? How? Where? By whom?
- Active vs passive, end-to-end vs provider network only,
application vs transport layer
- Rating schemes: provider 'net performance' pages, Internet
'Weather Map's, Keynote, etc.
Publish as CAIDA web pages, or maybe as an Info RFC
+ Survey paper on metrics and Internet Measurement
- Current measurement efforts (Surveyor, RIPE Test Traffic,
AMP, IPERF, AT&T, Keynote,skitter, ...)
- Current tools
Publish as CAIDA web pages
2 Service Metrics
+ Define new metrics
- Taxonomy of current metrics (IPPM, RTFM, ITU, ..)
- Summary of metrics used for current services
- Gather information/ideas about new/emerging services,
especially DiffServ-based ones
- Make list of new metrics, either to improve measurement of
existing services or to support new ones
[list of 'metrics' questions (Appendix A) goes here]
+ Organise experimental implementation/testing of tools
for new metrics
+ Make recommendations on implementation
- Define core set of 'really useful' metrics
- recommend that CAIDA implement these as a
'Service Measurement Toolkit'
+ Publish new metric definitions through IPPM or RTFM
+ Produce document "measurement requirements for hardware/software
vendors." Publish on CAIDA web pages
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix A: Questions from the earlier draft CAIDA WG charters
a. What types of network- and transport-layer metrics are being
used by ISPs in engineering and operating their networks?
By Customers for verifying service guarantees?
b. What new services are being (or are likely to be) offered, e.g.
DIFFSERV? Is there a need for higher-layer metrics to better
monitor and manage these services?
c. Will these new differentiated transport- and
application-layer services need new metrics?
d. How can the service metrics be measured in a multi-ISP
environment?
e. How can customers verify these measurements?
f. What requirements would service measurement introduce for
equipment vendors?
g. How relevant are specific techniques (e.g. which flow) and
points of measurement to specific users (ISP, customer, etc.)
requirements?
h. How do these metrics relate to network behavior as perceived
by users? How do they correlate with performance?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix B: Background on the IETF Working Groups
* RTFM WG: Realtime traffic Flow Measurement
RTFM is concerned with passive measurements of two-way traffic flows,
specified in terms of their end-point attributes. Its primary goal was
To produce an improved Traffic Flow Measurement Model considering at least the
following needs:
a. Wider range of measurable quantities, e.g. those
relating to IPv6, and to class of service
b. Simpler ways to specify flows of interest
c. Better ways to control access to measured flow data
d. Strong focus on data reduction capabilities
e. Efficient hardware implementation
* IPPM WG: IP Performance Measurement
The IPPM WG charter is to develop a set of standard metrics that can
be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet
data delivery services. These metrics will be designed such that they
can be performed by network operators, end users, or independent
testing groups. It is important that the metrics not represent a value
judgement (i.e. define "good" and "bad"), but rather provide unbiased
quantitative measures of performance.
RFCs
Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330)
Metrics:
Connectivity (RFC 2678),
One-way Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Loss (RFC 2680)
Round-trip Delay (RFC 2681)
I-Ds
Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x)
Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation
One-way Loss Patterns
* Other WGs
The RMONMIB WG is thinking about 'Application Performance
Measurement.' This is clearly a hard problem (e.g. does this just
mean response-time measurement, can it be done by passive means, how
should the measurements be presented, etc.).
In short
- RTFM provides a good distributed measuring system for traffic
volumes
- IPPM has concentrated on transport-layer behaviour of the
current, best-effort Internet.
- RMONMIB is beginning to consider application-layer measurement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----End of forwarded message----- | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
pls print TW and NN docs only--not Border. Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/30/2000
05:38 PM ---------------------------
Julia White
03/30/2000 10:22 AM
To: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kristen
Hand/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Mastio Survey
Attached below are the Mastio Survey presentations for TW, NNG and NBPL which
are to be reviewed with Stan and his direct reports on March 30. I want to
thank everyone for their time and effort in reviewing the findings and
recommendations for the Action Plans for each pipeline. The next steps will
be to make sure we focus on addressing the areas stated in the Actions Plans.
I also want to take the time to thank Tammy Lee-Jaquet for all her efforts in
pulling this information together for TW & NNG. In addition, Kirsten Hand was
instrumental in analyzing our information. We could not have done this
project without them. GREAT JOB!!
This is only the first phase of this project which means we now have the task
to ensure we address the areas of the Action Plans. More to come!!
Thanks again everyone. Julia
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron on 03/30/2000
08:32 AM ---------------------------
03/30/2000 08:59 AM
Scott Coburn
To: [email protected], [email protected], Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Mastio Survey
Attached is Northern Border's Mastio presentation.
sc
From: Ricki Winters 03/29/2000 07:02 PM
To: [email protected], Scott Coburn/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White, Tammy
Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Mastio Survey
This is the latest version of the Mastio Presentation covering TW and NNG for
the meeting tomorrow (3/30) for Stan and his Direct Reports.
Thank you,
Ricki | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The anwser is no, we didn't respond to 637 nor did we respond to this- just
see what FERc does with it- MK
From: Drew Fossum 12/05/2000 05:18 PM
To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: TW
Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading? Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing? DF | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
go ahead with your plans. The adoption table will be available on the 2nd floor of ECN on Tues - Fri this week 11:00 - 1
-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Chris A.
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: FW: Enron Kids Adopt A Child Program
The ETS Solution Center was going to go pick out a child today at lunch. Please let us know if it's better to go through you, or go ahead with our plans.
Thanks,
Chris
33270
-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of Kevin Hyatt.@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Employees@ENRON
Subject: Enron Kids Adopt A Child Program
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
For each of the last 15 years the Enron Kids Committee has chosen an under-privileged HISD elementary school and offered to "sponsor" every child in that school. What we mean by "sponsor" is that we outfit the child from head to toe plus give each of them a toy and book. The presents are then handed out to the children at their school Holiday Party in December. For most of these kids, it is their only Christmas present.
I am once again coordinating the volunteer / adoption efforts for ETS. Some ETS departments and employees have already sponsored a child-- thanks for your support. But thus far, we have only adopted 216 of 468 children. We need more help!!!!
If you would like to participate, I will coordinate collections and adoptions. Simply reply back to this email with the amount you would like to contribute. It costs about $100 to "sponsor" each child. Last year we were able to adopt 18 children.
All the funds collected will be matched by the Enron Foundation. The matching funds will be used to buy books and computers for the school. I will also need volunteers for shopping. If you would like to shop for the kids we sponsor, please let me know.
Thanks for your support!!
Kevin Hyatt x35559 & The Enron Kids Committee | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------
Carol St Clair
04/26/2000 02:05 PM
To: "Cynthia Cuomo" <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Finally, the ECT Repo Agreement
Cynthia:
Thanks for sending this. Just 2 questions:
1. In Section 7 of Annex 1 could we please add the recording language?
2. I understand from our folks that most notices are provided over the phone
and not necessarily followed up in writing and that this is the practice.
Can we provide for that in Section 13 of the Agreement?
Carol | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John, no we do not have an ISDA in place with Wah Chang. Do you want me to
pass your request on to Credit?
John Malowney
08/28/2000 06:21 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Wah Chang
Tana, can you answer this for me..... thanks, John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Malowney/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:27
PM ---------------------------
Jan M King
08/28/2000 03:45 PM
To: John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Wah Chang
I don't believe we do, John. But you should check with Tana Jones in
Houston. She handles ISDAs.
John Malowney
08/28/2000 01:50 PM
To: Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wah Chang
Jan, do we have an ISDA with Wah Chang ?? They are owned by Allegheny
Technologies.
Tracy, can you start looking at their credit/financials for me ??
Thanks, John | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I would suggest that we start reporting Capital Deployed and Funds Flow
numbers in these reports as well
as the Wholesale Group will need to take the lead in managing both.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Moore, Mary Kay
Sent: 11 June 2001 22:48
To: Aiken, Buddy; Allen, Melissa; Brown, Michael - COO London; Evans,
Stephen; Hiersche, Rich; Neocleous, Katerina; O'regan, Niamh; Sherriff, John;
Wood, Stephen
Cc: Killen, Faith
Subject: Frevert Report Published - June 11th
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The charts from these locations are not received in time to process for the 5th work day close, so these daily volumes are determined systematically based on the beginning and ending index readings. Even if they were, it is impossible to determine daily volume consumption from a 31day chart. Even decreasing the chart rotation is not a solution unless charts are received by the third work day to allow sufficient time for processing. The answer is to install EFM or possibly a Bullhorn unit to determine the actual daily index readings so that the daily quantities are accurately determined.. On these types of installations, how can we assess penalties on anything other than monthly quantities ? NNG has several locations where the existing equipment does not meet today's business needs, so we probably need to determine where these deficiencies exists, and identify the costs to resolve the problem.
Thanks-
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Zadow, Raetta
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:04 AM
To: Anderson, Gary E.; Lachapelle, Donna; Stewart, Angeline; Farmington-Pipeline, Team; Rice, Tom
Cc: Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick; Floyd, Jodie; Zadow, Raetta
Subject: FW: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas
Gary, was wondering if you could help us out. Scott has told me that they have 31 day charts for the stations listed below and he was wondering why we couldn't read those so as to get daily volumes rather than taking the total for the month and dividing it by the number of days in the month to get the daily volume. The reason for this is because, especially in the winter time, this can become very crucial when we calculate the penalty invoices which are done daily and are based on the differences between the daily physical volumes and the volumes that the shippers have scheduled on our pipe. If these charts cannot be read daily, what can we do to make it so that they can. Could you please check to find out what we need to do in order to have accurate daily volumes for these stations.
Thanks,
Raetta
-----Original Message-----
From: Farmington-Pipeline, Team
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Zadow, Raetta
Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas
Raetta, here are the stations numbers. Thanks for your help. Scott 612-270-8501
Arcadia 747-051-01,02
Eleva 747-161
Independance 747-221
Mondovi 747-341-01,02
Strum 747-411
Whitehall #1 747-921
Whitehall #3 747-923
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Team Farmington-Pipeline
06/22/2001 07:58 AM
To: Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>
Thanks for looking into this for me Raetta. I talked to Jim Banker this week and asked for him to check and see if they were charged for any penalty gas or not. He said that he would let me know if they had. He also stressed that we still need to see the actual daily volumes instead of average daily volumes on the volume statements. I'm not quit sure if this part of the problem has been addressed yet or not. Please let me know. Thanks Scott
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Raetta Zadow
06/15/2001 04:43 PM
To: Team Farmington-Pipeline/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jodie Floyd/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>
I have looked at the DDVC invoices for Midwest for March, 2001 which total $304.70. The SMS charges amount to $76.30 but the biggest part of the invoice is the negative DDVC charge which is for $228.40 - this occurred on March 26. I was wondering if the Midwest Natural Gas people could let us know what they think the volumes should be on those specific wells that they are concerned about for the 26th and then if necessary, we could make those corrections. Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do to help.
Thanks,
Raetta
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Team Farmington-Pipeline
06/14/2001 03:04 PM
To: Tom Rice/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Stevens/ET&S/Enron, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Angeline Stewart/GPGFIN/Enron, Diana Porter/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Daily Volumes For Midwest Natural Gas
I recently met with Jim Banker with Midwest Natural Gas from Whitehall, Wi. He informed me that he had some concerns about whether or not he was being charged for penalty gas for daily volumes. He showed me some gas volume statements that he recieved from GMS. I believe it was the month of March Statement. What the statement showed is average daily volumes instead of the actual volumes per day. (Ex. At Eleva TBS Days 1 and 2 showed 122 MCF and Days 3-31 showed 118 MCF.) These are charted stations with 31 day charts. The stations that he is concerned about are Arcadia, Eleva, Independance, Mondovi, Strum, Whitehall #1,and Whitehall #3. Any assistance or knowledge that you can provide me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Scott 612-270-8501 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This resource request has been rejected. You can view the details of the request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000070768&Page=MyReq.
Request ID : 000000000070768
Approver Type : Data
Signature : [email protected]
Comments : reject per Anne Bike
Request Create Date : 10/24/01 2:27:37 PM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\ERMS\1intra - [Read/Write]
Resource Type : Directory | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
000
WTNT32 KNHC 252030
TCPAT2
BULLETIN
SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO ADVISORY NUMBER 5
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 PM AST SUN NOV 25 2001
AT 5 PM AST...2100Z...THE CENTER OF SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO WAS
LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 30.7 NORTH...LONGITUDE 55.7 WEST OR ABOUT
550 MILES...885 KM...EAST OF BERMUDA.
THE STORM IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST SOUTHWEST NEAR 16 MPH...26 KM/HR
...AND A MOSTLY WESTWARD MOTION WITH A DECREASE IN FORWARD SPEED IS
EXPECTED DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE ESTIMATED NEAR 70 MPH...110 KM/HR
...WITH HIGHER GUSTS. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF SOME ADDITIONAL
STRENGTHENING DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS.
WINDS OF 40 MPH EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 690 MILES...1080 KM MAINLY TO
THE NORTH OF THE CENTER. THIS IS A HUGE STORM AND IT IS EXPECTED TO
GENERATE SWELLS THAT WILL AFFECT PORTIONS OF THE EAST COAST OF NORTH
AMERICA AND OF THE NORTH-FACING BEACHES OF THE BAHAMAS AND GREATER
ANTILLES DURING THE NEXT FEW DAYS.
THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 987 MB...29.15 INCHES.
REPEATING THE 5 PM AST POSITION...30.7 N... 55.7 W. MOVEMENT
TOWARD...WEST SOUTHWEST NEAR 16 MPH. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 70 MPH. MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE... 987 MB.
THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT
11 PM AST.
FORECASTER LAWRENCE
Make GoPBI.com's Storm Warning Center your No. 1 resource for hurricane
and tropical storm updates: http://GoPBI.com/storm
To subscribe or unsubcribe from this list, visit our Web site:
http://GoPBI.com/storm/email
DO NOT REPLY to this email. If you have questions or comments, send
them to [email protected]
Brought to you by GoPBI.com: http://GoPBI.com
You can contact us by mail or telephone at:
GoPBI.com
2751 South Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach FL 33405
(561) 820-3700
Copyright 2001 Cox Interactive Media | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
_________________________________________________________________
WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY
FOR
1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:
ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London
Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate.
Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU.
Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672
McNair, Darren 7138537955
AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.
EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
EDI: No Scheduled Outages
EES: No Scheduled Outages
ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages
ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: No Scheduled Outages
FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.
INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.
MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.
MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.
NT: No Scheduled Outages.
OS/2: No Scheduled Outages.
OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.
SITARA: No Scheduled Outages.
SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.
TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages
TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
UNIFY: No Scheduled Outages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE
(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center
Specific Help:
Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]
Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]
CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]
EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]
EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call (713) 327-6032 [Pager] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Nat Gas Summer Strip
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/summerstrip44.pdf
Nat Gas Winter Strip
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/winterstrip44.pdf
Nat Gas Calendar Strip
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/calendarstrip44.pdf
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We have received an executed First Amendment to the ISDA Master Agreement
dated effective May 9, 2001 between ARM and ENA, which provides for an
amendment to ARM's collateral threshold.
Copies will be distributed
Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-- | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached please find two new Notices of Filing in Docket Nos. EL01-33 and
EL01-34. One is a request for a cease and desist order, the other a request
for suspension of the underscheduling penalty. The filings are also attached
in a zip file. Please let me know if you are unable to open the zip file and
I will fax (or overnight if you prefer) the documents to you.
- EL01-34.1
- EL01-33.1
- california.zip | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
PLEASE VISIT OUR SPONSORS:
3'x5' Outdoor Flag $9.95. SAVE $25.00! When you buy a flag,we will donate 10% of total Flag Sales to the American Red Cross designated to the relief efforts in New York. CLICK HERE.
Dear Jane Tholt, NFL ODDS Saturday FAVORITE OPEN TODAY O/U UNDERDOG at New England 3 3 (37) Miami at San Francisco 3 3 (40 1/2 ) Philadelphia at Oakland 6 1/2 5 (46) Tennessee Sunday at Tampa Bay 3 3 (38) New Orleans St. Louis 12 1/2 12 (47) at Carolina at Kansas City 3 3 (40 1/2 ) San Diego at N.Y. Giants 4 3 1/2 (35) Seattle at Atlanta 4 4 (40 1/2 ) Buffalo Chicago 2 1/2 2 (33) at Washington at Baltimore 10 11 (33 1/2 ) Cincinnati at Green Bay 8 1/2 8 (38) Cleveland at Pittsburgh 9 10 (36 1/2 ) Detroit at Arizona 3 1/2 3 1/2 (37 1/2 ) Dallas at Minnesota 3 1/2 OFF (OFF) Jacksonville at Indianapolis 2 1 (47) N.Y. Jets
---COOL NEW REMINDERS---Great Quotes of the DayTravel DigestPet Tips ---FAVORITE REMINDERS---Entertainment NewsChildren's Product RecallsU.S. Market Indicies Get helpful ideas and insights from other small business owners and entrepreneurs. Sign up for Advice for Small Business. CLICK HERE.
To unsubscribe from this Reminder topic, click here.
To unsubscribe from SmartReminders altogether, click here.
[IMAGE] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin
For Power Delivered on Monday, October 29, 2001
(Trade Date of Friday, October 26, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
* volume represents sell-side only *
Hub High Low Wtd Avg Index Change ($) Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy $32.65 $31.05 $32.03 + .93 132,800
Comed $29.00 $27.50 $27.88 + .61 6,400
Entergy $28.00 $25.85 $26.50 + .31 16,000
Nepool $40.25 $39.75 $39.98 + .92 6,400
Palo Verde $35.50 $33.00 $34.07 + .93 10,000
PJM-West $32.50 $32.00 $32.25 + 1.86 32,800
SP-15 $36.50 $32.50 $33.78 + 1.32 6,000
TVA $34.50 $30.00 $33.11 + 2.08 8,800
Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals. Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals. Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange. Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge. IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact [email protected] .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
My assistant Taffy Milligan is tracking these down for you. Her direct no is
57373.
Brad Lawson
10/18/2000 07:57 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Prepaid contracts
Tana,
Sorry to bug you again regarding these contracts. Any idea when we can
expect them? Tom Myers is asking me for a spreadsheet, but I can't complete
it until I have some information from those documents.
If you've already sent them, thank you very much. If not, any idea when it
will be?
Brad
X5-3919 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.