text
stringlengths 2
1.7M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Vince,
The previous time I sent this it appeared not to be delivered by your
system. I am resending. I apologize if you get more than one of these
emails.
We are looking forward to you presenting at the conference. In regards
to your topic for the conference, the theme of the 2001 Electric Market
Forecasting Conference market volatility and risks regional markets.
Several of the presenters will explore the underlying drivers in the
respective markets that will effect market price and value of positions.
Others will be exploring Electric and Gas Forward Markets and Gas and
Oil Hedging Strategies.
Please consider one of the following topics:
* Western U.S. Markets: Issues and Understanding Western Markets
* Key Principles (and Strategies) for Managing Positions in
Volatile Energy Markets
The intent of the presentations is to get to the heart of emerging
electric market issues and increase awareness of the big issues and
principles that will give the attendees insights. However, as Warren
indicated, please feel free to select your own topic related to the
conference theme.
Listed below are the topics by the other presenters.
Just let me know the topic you would like to address. I am very willing
to discuss this with you over the phone if that would be helpful.
Regards,
Lee
Lee A. Barney
EPIS, Inc.
1800 Blankenship Road, Suite 350
West Linn, OR 97068
(503) 722-2023 x203
(503) 722-7130 FAX
www.epis.com
Other Presenters on the Market Forum Session of the Conference:
U.S. Electric and Gas Forward Markets
Brad Leach, Senior Director of Research
New York Mercantile Exchange
Western Canadian Markets
Paul Blaha, Manager, Power Marketing
ATCO
Eastern U.S. Markets
Brian Skinner, Director, Market Analysis
Williams Energy Market & Trade
ERCOT Market
Beth Garza, Director, Market Intelligence
FPL Energy
Midwestern U.S. Markets
Chester Bolling, Director, Regulatory Strategies
DTE Energy
Gas and Oil Hedging and Electric Markets
William Foley, Director, Global Commodities
Deutsche Bank (New York)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren H. Winter
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 7:56 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: Lee A. Barney
> Subject: RE: Market Forecasting Conference
>
> Vince,
>
> That's great! We really appreciate your attendance. I will have Lee
> Barney (our Vice President handling the conference agenda) contact you
> on the topic. If you have something you are particularly interested
> in addressing, please don't hesitate to let Lee know. We want you to
> have a topic that fits with your interests.
>
> Thanks again and I look forward to seeing you in September.
>
> Warren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaminski, Vince J. [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:44 AM
> To: Warren H. Winter
> Cc: Kaminski, Vince J.
> Subject: RE: Market Forecasting Conference
>
> Warren,
>
> I shall be very glad to attend the conference.
> Please, let me know what is the topic you would like me to
> address.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Assuming that this relates to a request from one of the online trading sites
(Buy Side Direct, Trading Edge or LIMITrader), Sara is correct that we intend
to use Morgan Stanley as our prime broker to clear our trades through the
site's clearing broker.
Mike
x39990
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000
10:15 AM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 10/05/2000 10:13 AM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re:
I'd stick with Anthony. I didn't think that Prudential was one of our
clearing brokers (remember, the letter must come from our clearing broker).
Please keep Mike Fowler and Paul Radous informed. Thanks. Sara
Samantha Boyd@ENRON
10/05/2000 09:32 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
Sara,
I have Kevin Enright at Prudential Securities, Incorporated and Anthony
Capolongo at Morgan Stanley researching the "Prime Broker Letter".
Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: (713) 853-9188
Fax: (713) 646-3490
email: [email protected]
Sara Shackleton@ECT
10/03/2000 06:53 PM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:
Paul Radous has requested that we seek a "Prime Broker letter" to send to the
CP.
Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements
database--> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John,
We finished the Version 2 of the simulation model which deals with the
open-close trading versus the continuous trading in the previous version.
I added the cummulative P/L as an output. There are a few apparent trading
strategies from this model:
1) Higher bid/offer spread, more profit
2) More Daily # of trades, more profit
3) Smaller net open positions allowed, more profit
1) and 2) are obvious, but 3) is more interesting. It means that we are
better off
if we do not allowed net open positions at end of the day. In a trending
market,
this makes an intuitive sense, for example, in the case of bull market we are
short as a market maker and we can avoid the loss at the higher openning price
by keeping zero or small net short positions.
I have attached the model with this mail, and I'll be happy to discuss the
model
in more details with you.
Zimin | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------
From: Dan Fancler 01/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Lisa Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Moseley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: Risk Management Caminus
David Port, ETS is purchasing a trading system from Caminus to track their
transactions. Included in this system are position reports which the
Accounting Department will be using to report and determine compliance with
the attached policy and procedures, including open positions, VAR, MTM,
approval limits, Greeks, credit risk, stress testing, basis positions,
confirmations and invoicing. The ETS Risk Management policy requires that
our reporting conform to the corporate standards, accordingly your name was
given to me as the person who could help direct some of the more technical
reporting standards.
Caminus is doing an introduction to their system today from 12:00 am to 3 pm
in 49c2, however I know you will not be back in town until next week. Vernon
Mercaldo is coordinating the installation of the system and will be needing
your input relating to Corporate reporting standards. As the project
progresses he will be contacting you.
Attached are drafts of the ETS Policy and Procedures. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good Morning,
Any GCP Adjustments will be highlighted in blue. Please feel free to give me a call, if you have any questions.
Amber N Ebow x5-8331
Global Counterparty_Enron Net Works
-----Original Message-----
From: Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:02 PM
To: Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-15-01
Please see attached.
<< File: EOL 10-15-01.xls >>
Regards,
Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2001 08:50
AM ---------------------------
From: Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 07:28 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/ENRON@enronXgate, David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate, Cris
Sherman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Catherine
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:
Draft of LV Cogen Turbine Swap DASH. Final will be circulated on Friday for
signature. Please send comments ASAP.
Regards,
Chip Schneider
713-853-1789
EB 2852 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The SRRS indicates there are no requests awaiting my approval.
Information Risk Management
01/14/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your approval is requested
Please be informed that you have one or more SRRS requests that are
outstanding due to a pending action to approve or reject decision on your
part. Please go to the SRRS (Lotus Notes desktop icon) and select the
"Requests Awaiting my Approval" option and complete the necessary action.
More SRRS request information can be seen within the request by clicking on
"Resource Display".
Your response will enable the SRRS process to continue for eventual closure.
Thank you,
Information Risk Management | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/01/2000 01:34
PM ---------------------------
"Karen Edson" <[email protected]> on 09/01/2000 12:16:17 PM
To: "Baker Carolyn (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Bill Carlson
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Curt Hatton (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Curtis Kebler (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "David Keane
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "David Parquet (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Duane Nelsen (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Ed
Tomeo (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Edward Maddox (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Eileen Kock (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Ellery Bob (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Escalante Bob (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Frank DeRosa (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Jan Smunty-Jones (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jim
Willey (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Joe Greco (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "John Stout
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Kent Fickett
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Marty McFadden (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Paula Soos
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Robert Lamkin (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Trond
Aschehoug (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "William Hall (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Richard Hyde (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Sandi McCubbin (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>
cc: "Ann Kelly (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Bev Hansen (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Bob Judd (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Govenar Scott
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Hedy Govenar (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Levake Barbara (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Monagan
Mike (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Rob Ross (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Ron Tom (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Rudman Cary (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Susan McCabe (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Legislative Update
I will send out a real legislative report next week. In the meantime, I
thought you might appreciate a quick run-down of what actually happened in
the final hours of this year's wild legislative session.
The good news is that the public benefit charge bill passed easily with a
10-year term and no statutory harm was done. The bad news is that utilities
captured the deregulation debate and successfully painted generators as
villains and the wholesale market as "broken."
Major legislative actions on energy matters follow. If you have any
questions or would like a copy of final legislation, please call.
AB 995 (Wright) and SB 1194 (Sher), which extend public benefit charges for
energy conservation, renewable energy development, and RD&D, passed the
State Legislature by large margins. Recent indications are that the
Governor will sign the bills, although interested companies should join IEP
in sending letters urging him to do so.
Power plant siting was front and center the last week of the session. As
recently as Wednesday of this week, the bill was so bad for new power plant
development that IEP opposed the expedited siting provisions. They were
rewritten by Republican staff and CEC attorneys to provide a 6-month process
for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impacts that might
help those few entities that can start the process in full compliance with
local rules. This provision is available for both combined cycle facilities
and peaking facilities. The bill also includes a provision for four-month
approval of amendments to pending applications providing for the
installation of temporary peaking generation on sites that will be
developed into combined cycle facilities within three years. The CEC
expects this to apply so a single pending application. Finally, the bill
includes language directing the CPUC and the EOB to be helpful on ISO issues
that affect the willingness self-generators to remain interconnected with
the grid.
Utility efforts to craft legislation assuring them of collection of large
negative balances in their Transition Revenue Accounts failed when they
could not reach agreement with representatives of large customer groups. In
its place, the Legislature passed a non-binding resolution directing the
CPUC to investigate the issue and including highly offensive language on
$100 price caps and retroactive recalculation of market clearing prices.
Legislation establishing a retroactive cap on SDG&E rates and providing no
assurance of cost recovery to Sempra passed the Legislature. Companion
legislation that most observers expect the Governor to veto provides $150
million of General Fund money to SDG&E.
A draft of so-called "sunshine" legislation surfaced late in the process.
The draft empowered the Electricity Oversight Board to collect anything it
might be interested in from the ISO, PX, utilities, generators, and
marketers and to treat the information confidentially. The draft faced
unified opposition and did not make its way into any legislation.
AB 1002 (Wright) establishing public benefit charges on the natural gas
system passed the Legislature. It continues to include language exempting
electricity generation from the charges.
Karen Edson
[email protected]
916/552-7070 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I heard you got information on Monica. Could you forward it to me?
Thanks,
Stacey | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Done!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 04:21 PM -----
Bob Shults
01/24/2001 04:17 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
your the best. make sure mark knows that
From: Tana Jones on 01/24/2001 03:58 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
For you, anything!
Bob Shults
01/24/2001 04:00 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Tana, can you send a loi to GFI with terms identical to the Prebon LOI. The
email should go to Tom Padrone at GFI. His email is [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jeff-please add me back to your distribution list for CA updates. Thanks--and keep up the tireless work. MDS | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
> DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION
>
> Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order! Please read and retain this
> e-mail for your records. It contains important information relating to
> your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell.
>
> Your Dell customer number is: 12831599
>
> Your order number is: 504703075
>
> Your total "Out of Pocket" amount: $1422.21
> The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and
> taxes.
>
>
> Your Online Sales Point of Contact:
> We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are
> Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time. You can reach our office
> by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at:
> [email protected] .
>
> Estimated Ship Date:
> We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 01/26/01.
> Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee
> the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in
> manufacturing. Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and
> conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com.
>
> Total Satisfaction Policy:
> If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll
> refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked. You
> are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us.
> EPP Customer Care contact options: 1-866-220-3355, option 4 or use the
> e-mail box US Relationship [email protected] .
>
> How to Check Order Status:
> If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's
> automated order status inquiry system at: 1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's
> Order Status Page at: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp.
>
> You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped,
> by going to: http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum.
>
> How to reach a Technical Support Representative:
> Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell
> technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3.
> You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number". The "Service Tag
> Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code
> label on the back of the system. Please have this number ready before you
> contact the technical support representative.
>
>
> Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program. It is
> my pleasure to work with you.
>
> Sincerely,
> Michelle Dorsett
> EPP On-Line
> Dell Computer Corporation
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> 1.877.692.2638 X 49794
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I cannot get into the system---please send me a paper approval sheet
[email protected]
11/03/2000 07:01 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for [email protected]
This request has been pending your approval for 9 days. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000005452&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000005452
Request Create Date : 10/23/00 11:15:18 AM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : MS Project
Resource Type : Applications | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
done at 9:30. can you pick me up. i'd love it. check your voicemail, too.
i left a message there.
Prentice Sellers <[email protected]> on 09/05/2000 05:42:28 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Tonight
Are you there? I'll be online for the next half hour or so. Did you get
my message? Dinner is at 8. What time are you done with class? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes, once I complete, I will send over. BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Gas Pitch
Barry,
You mentioned a gas outsourcing presentation. Could I get a copy of that? I am looking for examples of good ideas that can be applied to power - we have a current lapse in creativity!
Chris Calger
503-464-3735 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Tell him we are sending his note on to the appropriate person.
MARY
CLARK
04/03/2001 03:23 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Computers
Steve, I need your help in responding to this question.
Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 03:22
PM ---------------------------
From: Sherri Sera 04/03/2001 02:45 PM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Computers
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
02:46 PM ---------------------------
Anonymous
From: Anonymous on 04/03/2001 02:32 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: Computers
Since Enron and EBS are trying to cut costs and be more cost effective, why
would a vice president need an executive computer setup at home? Especially
if they already have a laptop (provided by Enron) they take home every night
and have taken advantage of the Click at Home program as well. Since Enron
has gone through the expense of giving each and every employee the
opportunity of the Click at Home program, it seems to be a somewhat redundant
expense of which I might add is unnecessary in my opinion.
I feel it would behoove ALL EMPLOYEES, including executives, to be more
conscientious of costs and expenses to improve Enron's and EBS' bottom-line.
How can we ("Enron") be a world leading company if we don't have leading
world leaders that spend Enron's money as if it were there own.
I think it would be in Enron's best interest to set some guidelines regarding
expenses such as these. Just because a person is an executive of the company
why should be allowed to have anything they want just because they can?
Thank you for your time and the opportunity to express myself. Especially
since I am a shareholder also and care where the money goes. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Homco/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 11:03 AM
---------------------------
From: Corry Bentley 11/28/2000 11:02 AM
To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW:
> (See attached file: democrat.bmp) <<democrat.bmp>>
- democrat.bmp | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a listing of trades that Enron Credit did in the name of Enron North America and ECT Investments Inc.
I had requested so that we have a listing when Bryan and Simon are no longer in London.
Sheila
-----Original Message-----
From: Hemsley, Simon
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:40 AM
To: Glover, Sheila
Cc: Seyfried, Bryan
Subject: As requested
Sheila - this is sorted by company/counterparty | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dave,
Thanks. I shall join you there.
Vince
David Ikenberry <[email protected]> on 03/12/2001 10:17:48 AM
To: George Kanatas <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Karolyi dinner tonight
I'm writing to confirm our dinner plans with Andrew Karolyi for this evening.
We have reservations for 7 pm at Damian's, 3011 Smith St., 713.522.0439
Dave
***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
to view the complete version, please go to:
http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=223
------------------------------------------------------------ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
That's it! Thanks and I'll talk with you soon.
Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email: [email protected]
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 1:04 PM
> To: Way, Karen S. - CHI
> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Gershon, Mark A. - CHI
> Subject: Re: Yorkville Annexation Agreement
>
>
> Hi Karen,
>
> I'm looking at a version which was faxed on Sept 13. If this the final
> version? Expecting the answer to be "yes", I am reviewing it now.
>
> Kay
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999. Please update your records.
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.
For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 09:13 AM -----
Barton Clark
09/11/2000 07:06 PM
To: Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.
I think I am one of the people who raised the issue about the Asset
Description in my mark-up of the Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheet that I
received this am from Stuart and returned to him midday. As I read the memo
below, I am instructed to advise you about the nature of the underlying
asset.
The asset is Series B Preferred Stock of Catalytica Combustion Systems, Inc.,
and an option to acquire same. Currently, pursuant to a Series B Stock
Purchase Agreement among Catalytica Combustion Systems, Inc. ( CCSI),
Catalytica, Inc. ( CCSI's parent and currently holder of Series A and common
stock of CCSI representing approximately 83% of the ownership of CCSI ) and
Enron Ventures Corp. ( predecessor in interest to Sundance Assets, L.P.),
Sundance owns 1,339,286 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and an option to
purchase 535,715 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
There are provisions calling for the adjustment of the number of option
shares subject to the option but I am not aware that any transactions that
would cause such adjustment provisions, other that the stock split referred
to below, to apply. The Series B stock is convertible to CCSI common stock,
is restricted stock, and the Stock Purchase Agreement provides for
registration rights. Currently, Tom White and Jack Urquhart both serve on the
CCSI Boards of Directors, and Jack serves on the Catalytica Inc. Board.
Under an Omnibus Agreement entered into in September 2000, in connection with
the restructuring of Enron's transactions with CCSI and in connection with
the proposed acquisition of Catalytica, Inc, by a third party ( DSM, a Dutch
pharmaceutical company) and the distribution of Catalytica's CCSI shares to
Catalytica's stockholders immediately prior to that acquisition, we agreed to
convert the Series B to CCSI common, agreed to vote for a 2 for 1 stock
split, and negotiated a cashless exercise of the option after the effective
date of the spin off. The effectiveness of these provisions is dependent upon
the effectiveness of distribution and acquisition The option itself ( as
amended by the Omnibus Agreement and otherwise ) expires January 14, 2001.
The distribution is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2000, but is
subject to a variety of conditions. After the distribution and concurrent
closing of the Catalyica acquisition transaction, CCSI ( which formerly
looked to its parent for financing and much of its administrative and other
support) will be a stand- alone public company listed on NASDAQ, with the
uncertainties attendant thereto.
The Omnibus Agreement also contains provisions amending Sundance's
registration rights, the board representation provisions in the original
Stock Purchase Agreement, and certain transfer restrictions ( to liberalize
them and allow the Raptor transaction to take place). There are also
agreements related to Enron North America's Xonon Technology Implementation
Agreement with GE and West LB, which do not directly affect the Series B
Preferred. These provisions instead go to the development program for CCSI's
technology, to which ENA contributes funding, and conform that agreement to a
change in CCSI's and GE's strategy for commercializing the technology. The
funding obligation itself is interconnected with the turbine purchases for
ENA's Pastoria project in California, but I don't believe that transaction
needs analysis for these purposes,
To comply with SEC rules in connection with the distribution, CCSI has filed
an S-1 registration statement registering the CCSI common stock to be
distributed to Catalytica's shareholders with the SEC, and Catalytica, Inc.
has filed a merger proxy statement with the SEC in connection with its
solicitation of Catalytica stockholder approval to the acquisition
transaction. Comments are expected from the SEC in 4 to 6 weeks.
Please give me a call if you wish to discuss this matter further, and I am
instructed to request that you return the revised copy of the Raptor I
Proposal Sheet to me and copy Mary Cook and Lisa Mellancamp thereon. The
foregoing description may be more than you need for the summary, but it
really is a very abbreviated snapshot of the transaction. All the documents
related to the Preferred Stock and Option, including the executed Omnibus
Agreement and the Stock Purchase Agreement, have been previously delivered to
Sara Shackleton and Hope Vargas.
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 06:18 PM -----
Stuart Zisman
09/11/2000 05:15 PM
To: James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Raptor - Private Hedge Candidates
It has come to my attention that questions have been raised in reviewing the
Raptor I Derivative Proposal Sheets regarding the type of information that
should be set forth in the category entitled "ASSET DESCRIPTION". The Master
Derivatives Agreement ("MDA") requires that the Proposal Sheets describe the
"Assets" with respect to which the derivative transaction is to be executed.
For purposes of the MDA, "Assets" is defined as "assets, including without
limitation common stock, partnership interests, member interests. other
ownership interests, and other financial and physical assets." Therefore,
the description should include both the nature of the "Asset" (i.e. whether
it is an equity interest, a loan, working interest, etc.) and a little bit
about the company (the entity in which ENA holds the interest or has the loan
or working interest).
Any comments to the Proposal Sheets should be delivered ASAP to the "Enron
person completing this form" (This is the 3rd line under the heading
"GENERAL" on each of the Proposal Sheets) along with a request that a revised
Proposal Sheet be returned to the lawyer providing comments with copies to
both Mary Cook and Lisa Mellencamp.
The pressure to complete these Raptor hedges remains high and therefore your
immediate attention is greatly appreciated. Many thanks.
Stuart | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Could you send me copies of the Excel reports you want us to modify. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Griffith, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Wong, Jeremy
Cc: Maggi, Mike; McLaughlin, Errol
Subject: Predictive Greeks
Jeremy,
Each day, we receive a report that shows the movement of the position's gamma
with a change in the underlying (a gamma slide). We would like to see how
difficult it would be to see the same with vega (a vega slide). Also, there
is a report that shows totals for all the greeks by month. Could you put a
total line at the bottom of this report? Please let me know of the
difficulty of these changes. Thanks.
John
x. 36247 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
looks fine
Eric Gillaspie
04/05/2001 07:24 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karl E Atkins/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Easement encroachment demand letter
Richard,
We plan on sending this demand letter (and an identical one to the other
co-owner) out today.
Ann Elizabeth wanted me to run it by you before we send it out. Please let
me know if you have any questions or comments.
Thanks,
Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I just wanted to say it was good to see you the other day, though brief =) Let's get together soon for lunch or something. I'm missing my Bob time! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Have you heard of this request yet? Seth said that he mentioned it to the
EOL team but was not sure if they had mentioned it to you yet.
----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 08/11/2000 07:33 AM -----
Seth Hurwitz
08/10/2000 04:54 PM
To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:
Brent, we understand that Tempest, another Bermuda reinsurer, is also
interested in getting EOL access. What's the timetable on Bermuda due
diligence (I know we discussed this briefly earlier this week)? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
See below. Can we get some help on the IBM issues?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/12/2000 02:36 PM -----
Erin Rice
11/10/2000 11:08 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: BackWeb
Steve:
At this point, our IT contacts are backpedalling a bit and suggesting they
can overcome the TIBCO and Terminal Server problems. There are still four
important issues, however:
IT still cannot commit to transferring messages across domains. This means
that messages initiated at Corp and intended for the entire Enron
organization will not reach any business units outside the Corp domain.
No messages will reach the EES organization unless IBM agrees not to use
their proprietary message delivery tool, WebSphere, and will use WebLogic
instead. WebLogic is required by BackWeb, although it is designed by a
separate company.
HR, intended to be a key user of this tool, will not use BackWeb because
survey responses cannot be made anonymous. HR has already purchased a tool
called CONFIRMIT that can execute anonymous surveys.
Messages will not be delivered simultaneously to all users in the same
domain, nor will they be delivered for two to five hours after they are sent
by the message administrator.
Another thing to consider is that these messages will be set to expire and
disappear within a set period of time, meaning users cannot retrieve them and
read them later (as they can with e-mail). This means that I could be away
from the office for several days and miss a message entirely, because it
would have expired and disappeared by the time I returned.
The plain fact is that a few members of IT are pushing this initiative, but
they lack commercial sponsorship. They are hoping Corp will foot the bill
for a pilot which will allow them to fully test this tool before implementing
it company-wide.
Please let us know if you have additional questions.
- er
----- Forwarded by Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:08 PM -----
Steven J Kean
11/09/2000 11:35 AM
To: Courtney Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: BackWeb
Do we have a sense for how many we can reach, how many we can't and where
they are? Are whole offices (eg Tokyo) unreachable or is it only those who
have home offices?
Courtney Votaw
11/08/2000 11:02 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Erin Rice/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: BackWeb
Mark and Steve-
Erin Rice and I would like to meet with you to discuss the issues concerning
BackWeb before we proceed. As you can see from the Design Document, they are
pretty significant.
Thanks,
Courtney | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is to confirm the monthly Industrials meeting for Thursday June 22, 2000
at 1:00 pm.
Date: June 22, 2000
Thursday
Time: 1:00 pm
Location: EB 3316
Topic: Industrials
If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel to call me at 853-0643.
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daren,
Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know
what CPI stands for???
Sandi
Daren J Farmer
10/16/2000 11:39 AM
To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal
Sandi,
Sorry for just now getting back with you. I was out last week.
The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated
on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant. The fee will
be adjusted yearly based on CPI.
Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the
delivered volumes (actuals or nominations). I think we should use actuals
due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a
daily basis. We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to
purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at
the 45,000 base. I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they
are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less. Do
you agree with this?
D
From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rate for Tenaska Deal
Daren,
When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you
guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me
how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater
of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual
deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year?
based on what index?
Thanks,
Sandi | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Greg,
Looks good. The updated ICA for your further handling.
Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
Greg Brazaitis
01/29/2001 12:38 PM
To: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rio Nogales Schematic
Eric,
Recommended Exhibit "A" for Rio Nogales. Comments?
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
12:37 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: James R Haden 01/29/2001 11:14 AM
To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rio Nogales Schematic
If this looks OK, please send it to Eric. If you need any changes or
corrections, just let me know and I will make them. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 10:20 AM -----
Jeff Worman <[email protected]>
10/04/2000 02:54 PM
Please respond to "[email protected]"
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
I do appriciate that not all is final and until it becomes completely final
i will stay put. I have been looking at barn designs, I have ali the next
couple of weekends, maybe one day when things are complete I will have you
out for a tour.
jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 1:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
Congratulations on the farm!!!!! I will be in the Woodlands Thursday and
part of Friday at a Legal Conference. I would invite you to golf, but I
know you are way busy. Let me know if I can help with the move.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
__________________
HAVE A GOOD DAY !!!!!!!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Frank - What's the word from Enserco?? Have you had a chance to call Darrell
yet about that penalty they took in the October netout? Let me know.
Thanks,
...Chuck
x.36275 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
it will update tomorrow
From: O'Neal D Winfree 10/24/2000 07:42 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thrill Kill vs Snake Pit
Hey Commish,
It appears as though I did not receive points for the Miami Defense (18) or
Lamar Smith (36) due possibly to the late ending of the Monday night game...
With the points, I should have 132 and a victory over the Snake Pit... As it
stands now, I have only 78 points, and a loss in the system... Is there
anything we can do???
thrill kill | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks Chica!
Kate Symes @ ECT 11/16/2000 04:12 PM
To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: El Paso Electric Company Deal # 460852
Thanks for checking. I entered this deal today and am still getting used to
all the different variations of company names. You're right - it's El Paso
Merchant.
Thanks,
Kate
Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
11/16/2000 01:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: El Paso Electric Company Deal # 460852
Hi Kate!
I just want to make sure that this is the correct counterparty name. Usually
we trade with El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. Is this name entered correctly?
Kim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Shirley,
Transmission is my 1st choice.
Vince
Shirley Crenshaw
05/01/2001 03:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: The Next Transmission Roundtable
Vince:
This will make 3 appointments for 11:30 on the 9th. #1 - V@R Lunch meeting,
#2 - This is the day that David Hernandez has requested that you have
lunch with him and the Roundtable makes #3. What do you want to do?
Vince J Kaminski
05/01/2001 02:19 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable
Please, put on my schedule.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:19 PM ---------------------------
Anita DuPont@ENRON
05/01/2001 12:51 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: The Next Transmission Roundtable
The next Transmission Roundtable will be on Wednesday, May 9, 2001, from 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM in EB 49C1. Please notify me if you CANNOT attend. I will send another email soon with the menu we will be serving. Thanks. Anita
<Embedded StdOleLink> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here you go Lawrence. Thanks again for the invitation. We would like to
participate in hearings such as this. I may be at the hearing on Monday,
but I'm not the FERC expert.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Mona
(See attached file: skean FERC comments.doc)
- skean FERC comments.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What about the questions I asked about whether the new entity would comply
with Order No. 2000 (especially if the state has the vertically integrated
utilities operate the system)? See attached word version of my orginal
E-mail.
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
Bernadette Hawkins@ENRON
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
02/21/2001 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility
Attached is a memo that addreses the FERC's jurisdiction over the
transfer/sales of utility assets to the state of California. At a minimum,
FERC must approve the transfer. Call if you have questions. Joe
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 02/21/2001 01:55 PM -----
"Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
02/21/2001 01:10 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, "Andrea Settanni" <[email protected]>,
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
Subject: Scope of FERC Jurisdiction Over State-Owned Utility
Please see attached memorandum. We have also attached FERC's orders
addressing LIPA's acquisition of LILCO's transmission assets and LIPA's open
access tariff. Please call if you have any questions.
- 0138443.01
- EC97-45.TXT
- NJ98-4.TXT | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
we need a guess now. Stan wants a first pass by tomorrow afternoon - we should be able to ballpark this number.
-----Original Message-----
From: Centilli, James
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy
Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template
Facilty Planning personnel are out of office today, but will return in the morning. I have ask for their estimate no later than Monday morning. They may be able to give me something tommorrow. I will complete the project model when I get a description of facilities and cost estimates.
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James
Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template
James:
Can you roll each of the expansions that we discussed into Rod's project model? Michael Ratner will then link those into the TW financial model.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Howard, Kevin A.; Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James
Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template
Project model
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:28 AM
To: Thames, Davis; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James
Cc: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: tw subscription rolloff template
Attached is the actual contract roll off info by segment prepared by Shelley Corman for our bank due diligence. We need to use this and assume we re-subscribe the roll off capacity at an "average rate" - Lindy, we will need your assistance in developing this avg. rate by segment. For the expansions we discussed, Rod will circulate an expansion model that we can layer into the financial model.
Tracy: call me when you get in and we can discuss.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Thames, Davis
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:49 PM
To: Howard, Kevin A.; Geaccone, Tracy; Ratner, Michael; Donoho, Lindy; Centilli, James
Subject: tw subscription rolloff template
I have attached a template to use to summarize the capacity rolloff issue discussed today. I just filled in a bunch of numbers as an example - if they don't make any sense, you can guess why!
Lindy, if you could use this to fill in the required data, then either Michael or I will incorporate it into the TW model.
Thanks-
Davis | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a draft of the Declaration of Jeffery Fawcett. If you have
comments, please let me know.
Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
[email protected]
(713) 853-0596 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Congratulations. And count me in. We're off to the races.
Best,
Jeff
And a very Happy Thanksgiving.
Sue Nord
11/21/2000 10:01 AM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy
Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected],
Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: The Answer Is: To CLEC!
Hello Everyone,
We've gotten word back from Jim Fallon to go forward with obtaining CLEC
licenses. This brings us to the next set of questions:
Which entity do we license? EBS or ETI?
If we license ETI as a CLEC, can we transfer EBS' IXC licenses to ETI?
Do we get CLEC licenses in all states, or some strategic subset of states?
I'd like to put together a group to address these questions, working with
legal, tax, and commercial people. Please let me know if you are interested
in participating in this group. It most likely will involve a fairly
intensive schedule of meetings in Houston during December.
We should hold off on filing new IXC license applications until we have
resolved the EBS vs. ETI issue. For states where an EBS IXC license
application currently is pending, let's not be too aggressive in pushing
those applications forward over the next month. Give me a call if this
creates a problem in any of your states. Also, Scott, please let everyone
know if there are any fiber-build states where you think the delay would be a
problem.
Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions.
Sue | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Computer Support: 713-348-8319 (help with computer connection)
Suzanna Vazquez: 713-348-3736 (copies, etc.)
Please let me know if you have any more questions or if I can help in any way.
Pamela Castro
MBA Program Associate
Rice University
713-348-6223 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022809.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
> --
> On April 15th, I sent the following e-mail about a series of SCE advice
> filings. The one which I highlighted for potential concern was 1534-E
> which starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor and
> DWR. On April 20th, SCE filed a supplement to 1534-E which it states
> replaces 1534-E in its entirety. Accordingly the clock for protests was
> reset and protests on the advice filing are now due on May 11th. The
> changes made by SCE are not of a nature to drastically impact the summary
> of the advice letter sent to you on April 15th. I will forward the
> amended advice letter under separate cover. Please let me know as soon as
> possible if we want to protest.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBennett
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 12:32 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Harry Kingerski
> (E-mail)'
> Subject: SCE Advice Filings
>
> On Thursday, April 12th, I forwarded to you a series of Advice filings
> which SCE made on April 11. The attached document summarizes those
> filings. While two the three appear to be fairly innocuous, one (1534-E)
> apparently starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor.
> Please pay careful attention to your review of that advice. If we are to
> protest, such protest would be due on May 1.
>
> <<X23609.DOC>>
>
> Jeanne Bennett
- X23609.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Cesar is at Tractebel ........ Him and Jason Armenta together ,,,,,,, what
a combo! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 02:33 PM -----
"Dellacona, Dana (Commodities - NY)" <[email protected]>
03/28/2001 11:20 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Lovvorn, Kelly" <[email protected]>, "Crespo, John" <[email protected]>,
"Cerria, Chuck (Commodities - NY)" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Enron On-line-AHC Trading
Tana,
Per my voice mail to you this week, I have obtained the information which
you requested regarding Amerada Hess Corporation's ability to trade on Enron
On-Line.
Amerada Hess Corporation would like to trade gas and power, financial and
physical, in the United States and Canada.
We would also like to trade options for gas and power.
Could you run the necessary reports and contact me with our current ability
to trade On-Line? Also, if we do not presently have the ability to trade
the above, could you inform me as to the steps which need to be taken in
order to trade?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Dana M. Dellacona
1185 Avenue of the Americas
NY, NY 10036
Ph:212.536.8133
Fx:917.342.8810
[email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dellacona, Dana (Commodities - NY)
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:21 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: Cerria, Chuck (Commodities - NY); Lovvorn, Kelly
> Subject: Enron On-line-AHC Trading
>
> Tana,
>
> This confirms our conversation today regarding Amerada Hess Corporation's
> ability to trade on Enron On-line. As discussed, I will check to see what
> specific products we intend to trade with regard to Energy, Physicals,
> and/or Derivatives. I will also check to see whether we intend to trade
> in the US, Canada, and/or Europe. I do understand that you cannot give me
> an accurate answer as to our ability to trade On-line until I provide this
> to you. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I will try to do the
> same.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dana M. Dellacona
> 1185 Avenue of the Americas
> NY, NY 10036
> Ph:212.536.8133
> Fx:917.342.8810
> [email protected]
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT
Description:
EB8c1 - Finalization of next phase deliverables
Date: 5/8/2001
Time: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Stacey W White
Detailed Description: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Done
DG
Tricia Truong
12/20/2000 06:29 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enervest S# 27239
Hi Daron,
Could you please change rate on the above Sitara to $4.15544 for Nov. 00
Production ?
Thanks for your help,
T 3-9852 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Done!
Stephanie Panus@ENRON
01/19/2001 09:17 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit contact
Tana -
Can you add Aparna Rajaram as a credit contact in our financial trading
database?
Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Alaska Airlines announces a Winter Web Sale. Sale fares must be purchased
on Alaska,s web site at www.Alaskaair.com and are valid for travel between
November 28, 2000 and March 30, 2001.
These fares require a 7-day advance purchase, a 1 night minimum and 30 day
maximum stay. Fares start at $59 for travel on Tuesday, Wednesday and
Saturday and at $74 for travel on Monday, Thursday, Friday and Sunday.
Tickets must be purchased by December 1, 2000.
Sample Markets:
Portland - San Francisco $59
Portland - Los Angeles $99
Seattle - Oakland $69
Seattle - Orange County $99
Spokane - San Jose $69
Spokane - San Diego $99
See our web site www.Alaskaair.com for more destinations.
Sale details:
Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
Offer is for a limited time and is subject to change without notice.
Valid on new bookings only.
Tickets must be purchased by December 1, 2000.
Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $12 or
segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
Other restrictions apply.
For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton Web site at:
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service.
While we,d be pleased to continue to tell you about our great products and
prices, you can unsubscribe to our Email Notification Service by visiting
our Web site at: http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp
Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot
be answered. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark, thanks for looking at the language. Deleting the concept is fine. If
you need another copy
of the draft, please let me know.
Thanks, Steve
[email protected] wrote:
> Steve -
>
> I looked at the below language. I guess I still have some concerns about
> the concept.
>
> Why don't we go back to your original suggestion and delete the concept
> entirely. I am sure if either party believes strongly enough that a breach
> has occurred, it will pursue its available remedies.
>
> If this is acceptable, I will work off of the draft forwarded by Brenda and
> see if we can finalize a document for signature by Enron.
>
> Please let me know if this will work.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mark
> Senior Counsel, ENA
> Phone: 713-345-8897
> Facsimile: 713-646-3940
> E-Mail: [email protected]
>
>
> Steve.Barry@s
> abre.com To: [email protected],
Brenda Crabtree
> <[email protected]>
> 04/05/2001 cc:
> 10:34 AM Subject: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE
PROVISION
> Please
> respond to
> Steve.Barry
>
>
>
> Mark, attached please find the proposed Residual Knowledge
> provision that we discussed. If acceptable, please advise
> and I'll incorporate into the last version of the NDA.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This communication is intended solely for use by the
> addressee and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under
> applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this
> communication violates the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use,
> dissemination or
> copying of this communication other than by the addressee is
> prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please
> immediately notify the sender
> and destroy the original and all copies of this
> communication.
>
> (See attached file: 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: 1_Residual knowledge
clause.doc
> 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
> Encoding: base64
> Download Status: Not downloaded with
message
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This communication is intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this communication violates the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use, dissemination or
copying of this communication other than by the addressee is prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the
sender
and destroy the original and all copies of this communication.
- Steve.Barry.vcf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please include [email protected] and [email protected] on the email with dial
in instructions. thanks, Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 04:59
PM ---------------------------
From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 12/22/2000 04:22 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: [email protected] @ ENRON, [email protected], Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wednesday, Dec 27 11AM CST Conference Call
All:
Please plan to participate in a conference call on Wednesday, Dec. 27 at 11AM
CST to discuss the breakout contract for the transformers.
Mike / Dave:
It would be extremely helpful to have comments back on the proposed form of
agreement provided to you earlier by Kay before this conference call. Please
forward your comments to the e-mail group listed above.
Shelby / Lorie:
Please set up a call in number and distribute the call in info to the e-mail
group listed above.
Thanks much everybody. Have a happy and safe holiday. Aloha!
Ben | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 03:14 PM
---------------------------
Enron Technology
From: Inja Chun 09/25/2000 12:52 PM
To: Dan Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes
Dan and Tom,
As we discussed, I am aggressively seeking well qualified top talent
permanent and contract personnel for both Commodity Logic and Deal Bench. We
have specified our requirement for specialized technical experience
(WebLogic, Java, JSP, HTML) and we are receiving many promising resumes in
response. We talked with Andersen Consulting, PriceWarterhouse, Enform,
Valtech, Common Vision, Delinea, etc. and we made it clear that we want them
to augment our permanent staff rather than doing a turn-key operation to
which they have all agreed.
Attached are some of the preliminary resumes and fee schedules from EnFORM,
we expect many others to be in approximately same range of rates. If you
have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Inja
PROPOSAL- summary
Technical BUSINESS MODEL DEVELOPMENTJava Support
Offer Expires on October 30, 2000
Page 2 of 2
Category Resource Level Availability
Date Billable Rate
Technical Mgr Bryan, Curt Senior Manager October 3 $180 (65% Std)
Sr. Architect Zhou, Xiaodong Senior Manager October 3 $180 (65% Std)
Andrews, Jim Senior Manager Now $180 (65% Std)
Architect Kounthapanya, Sam Lead Senior Now $125 (70% Std)
Tran, Tommy Lead Senior October 16 $125 (70% Std)
Moore, Paula Senior Consultant Now $110 (70% Std)
Kefi, Omar Senior Consultant October 16 $110 (70% Std)
Data Architect Smith, Maria Manager Now $145 (60% Std)
Sr. Developer Chung, Brandon Senior Consultant October 3 $110 (70% Std)
Hamilton, Matthew Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std)
Moore, Eric Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std)
Yeager, Nathan Senior Consultant October 30 $110 (70% Std)
Jr. Developer Cherry, Travis Staff Consultant Now $55 (60% Std)
Dauphin, Doug Staff Consultant Now $55 (60% Std)
Olson, Sara Experienced Consultant October 9 $80 (60% Std)
Sample, Matt Experienced Consultant October 30 $80 (60% Std)
---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 11:00 AM
---------------------------
"Martin, Dan" <[email protected]> on 09/22/2000 05:38:30 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: "Wendler, Doug" <[email protected]>, "Rodriguez, Melody"
<[email protected]>
Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes
Inja and John,
Again, it was a pleasure meeting with you yesterday. As promised, I am
sending the resumes of candidate architects and developers along with a
short proposal for your review. I also included the resumes of a few very
capable Junior Developers in case you see a need for additional horsepower
at a very low rate. If possible, I would like to stop by for a short 10-15
minute meeting with you on Monday so I can deliver a hard copy and then walk
you through our proposal.
As you can imagine, we are very interested in working with Enron so we have
given you the selection of our best folks and we have priced these
individuals very aggressively. I look forward to working with you in the
near future.
Regards,
Dan Martin
Director, Java Technology
(713)350-1829
<<Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt>> <<Enron_Proposal_1.doc>> <<Enron
Java Resumes.zip>>
- Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt
- Enron_Proposal_1.doc
- Enron Java Resumes.zip | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI; please take any action you deem appropriate. Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000
11:59 AM ---------------------------
Pat Brandt <[email protected]> on 11/30/2000 04:55:52 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: online compliance training
Hi James:
My name is Pat Brandt and I work for the Legal Research Center ("LRC") in
Minneapolis. As you may know, we are the nation's leading provider of
outsourced legal research and writing services. Recently, we have entered
into a strategic business alliance with Integrity Interactive Corporation
("IIC"), to offer industry-leading, online compliance training - training
that could help Enron save millions in the event of a DOJ prosecution.
LRC's role in this alliance is to provide the legal research content for the
compliance courses and assist in the marketing and selling of the IIC
product.
You can view our compliance modules at work or home, as long as you have
access to the internet and a personal access code. To receive an access
code or more information, please call (800-776-9377) or send me a reply
email. Thank you for your time and have a great day!
Sincerely,
Patrick C. Brandt, Esq.
e-Compliance Sales Director
Legal Research Center
700 Midland Square
331 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55401
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Not necessary yet, Karen, but thanks. Fitz is out of the office until
Monday, so there won't be any action taken until then. Thanks again, SRS
Karen Marshall@ECT
03/29/2000 03:44 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Franz Edward Alphonse
Thanks Sherri.
Franz Alphonse did not interview with Enron. He may be interested in a
business venture related to his company?? I can pull his resume for you if
you like. Just let me know.
Thanks,
Karen Marshall
Enron North America Corp.
From: Jeff Skilling @ ENRON 03/29/2000 11:47 AM
Sent by: Sherri Sera@ENRON
To: Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Franz Edward Alphonse
Jay, Jeff received a call yesterday from a 2nd year HBS student and
co-founder of a B2B commerce company - Franz Edward Alphonse - who wanted to
speak to Jeff (for the ever-popular "5 minutes") about his company. Jeff has
asked that you follow up with this gentleman. His phone number is
617.493.5597.
(Karen, I'm copying you in the event you have any information on Mr. Alphonse
- i.e., did he interview w/Enron and if so, how did he do).
Thanks, Jay. Please send Jeff a note with any update once you have spoken to
Franz.
SRS
PS - I'm back from Italy and ready to have that drink whenever it works for
you and Greg. I understand he's out for a few weeks now while he moves his
family to Houston... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Trang,
Thanks.
Vince
From: Trang Dinh 01/10/2000 06:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations!
You did again! I just read about your most recent accomplishment.
Congratulations on your promotion! Go Vince....go Vince... go Vince..!
Sending warmest regards,
Trang | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You 'da best.
Kay Mann
12/11/2000 09:04 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re
Gleas on, et.al.
I know how to get LJM's signature.
Enron North America Corp.
From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:58 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re
Gleas on, et.al.
Thanks again Kay.
Now we need to wrap up the fun process of signatures. I hate to suggest
this, but perhaps John Normand is a good starting point for EE&CC/NEPCO sigs.
MItch
Kay Mann
12/11/2000 08:44 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re
Gleas on, et.al.
Mitch,
The language in the draft I sent out yesterday reflects our agreement during
the conference call. They requested something along the lines of what is in
the email you forwarded, but I believe they accepted the following language:
SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated
warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole or
in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that Enron will not be required to
maintain an equity position in either of these companies. SWPC further
acknowledges that the assignment of the contracts and the transfer of equity
will not impact any warranties or other provisions of the assigned contracts.
How does this sound?
Kay
Enron North America Corp.
From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:09 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas
on, et.al.
Kay -
No way. My reading of the contract indicates that they can't withhold
approval anyway. Did they bring this up in Friday's conference call?
Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
08:07 AM ---------------------------
DeKrey Lynn <[email protected]> on 12/08/2000 12:07:47 PM
To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: Monahan Bill <[email protected]>, Saugstad Kathryn
<[email protected]>
Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas
on, et.al.
Mitch
SWPC requests that revision below be incorporated
Lynn DeKrey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saugstad Kathryn
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:47 AM
> To: DeKrey Lynn
> Cc: Monahan Bill
> Subject: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re
> Gleason, et.al.
>
>
> Lynn:
>
> I have compared the latest version of the settlement agreement provided by
> Enron . . . . . . . . . We do want to have approval on the assignments.
> Granted, SWPC will not unreasonably withhold the approval but, we need to
> keep this ability.
>
> Thus, Paragraph 5 should read:
>
> SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated
> warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole
> or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
> Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that SWPC's consent to such
> assignments will not be unreasonably withheld. SWPC will honor warranty
> claims currently outstanding or asserted in the future by the contract
> assignee, assuming such assignment is in accordance with the terms and
> conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts.
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<hallmark.gif>>
- hallmark.gif | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
T. Would you please send runner to get this? Thanks mhc
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
-----Original Message-----
From: Patel, Tania <[email protected]>
To: Berry, Lara <[email protected]>; Booth, Khymberly <[email protected]>; Broadfoot, Mark <[email protected]>; Buckley, Karen <[email protected]>; Butcher, Sharon <[email protected]>; Cash, Michelle <[email protected]>; Clyatt, Julie <[email protected]>; Cronin, Jennifer <[email protected]>; Davis, Sarah A. <[email protected]>; Divelbiss, Sasha <[email protected]>; Duncan, Josh <[email protected]>; Engler, Adrianne <[email protected]>; Fincher, Wendy <[email protected]>; Foster, David <[email protected]>; Gonzalez, Cynthia <[email protected]>; Hargrave, Michelle <[email protected]>; Joyner, Tamera <[email protected]>; Kerr, Vanessa <[email protected]>; Klicker, Karl <[email protected]>; Labbe, Anne <[email protected]>; Lane, Jonathan <[email protected]>; Lewis, Simone <[email protected]>; Lorenz, Michael <[email protected]>; McGarr, Rebecca <[email protected]>; McLoughlin, Hector <[email protected]>; Melodick, Kim <[email protected]>; O'rourke, Tim <Tim.O'[email protected]>; Oxley, David <[email protected]>; Palmer, Lizzette <[email protected]>; Peng, Terry <[email protected]>; Quintana, Becky <[email protected]>; Russi, Estalee <[email protected]>; Slone, Jeanie <[email protected]>; Solis, Felicia <[email protected]>; Sprock, Angela <[email protected]>; Sullivan, Kriste <[email protected]>; Tessandori, Bobbi <[email protected]>; Wilbeck, Tom <[email protected]>; Worrell, Perrin <[email protected]>; Yeverino, Norma <[email protected]>; Zarkowsky, Sarah <[email protected]>; Brown, Cole <[email protected]>; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec <[email protected]>; Curless, Amanda <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Nov 13 08:34:14 2001
Subject: Book Club - come and get'em
OK - The books have arrived and I have ordered a limited amount.
Please come by my desk - 1669A to pick these up.
I would drop them off, but it is a long story!!
See you all soon and happy reading!!
(You may send someone else to pick up your book)
Tania Patel
HR Analyst
Enron Executive Compensation
713-345-4990 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000
02:30 PM ---------------------------
Hunter S Shively
08/30/2000 11:38 AM
To: Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the information I received back from IT in Houston regarding the
Forward Obligation Report. It looks like, for our purposes, the most accurate
way to run the report is showing only term deals. The "Schedule" and
"Liquidate" versions of the report do not capture desk-to-desk deals, and
therefore will not show our traders' positions in relation to each other,
which I believe is what we're looking for. Am I right? Or totally crazy? Let
me know what you think.
Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/04/2001 11:33 AM
---------------------------
From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT
To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report
Hi Diana & Kate,
You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be
able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage,
if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes
insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which
Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things
like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month.
Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation)
data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with
Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule
data should be very much the same with all the changes
in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and
liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and
it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain
data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation
the same data from 4/2/1996.
Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule
between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule
(liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid
confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format
of the header for Region, nothing else.
Kroum
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: Forward Obligation Report
Kroum,
I was running the new version of the Obligation Report. I was not included
in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still
not doing what the "fix" was initiated for. Originally, my discussions with
Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any
changes made in Deal Scheduling and 2. All Desk to Desk deals. Number
(2), I believe was the difficult one. When selecting the option on "Show
Deals" in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate".
This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to
Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes. Please
contact me for further discussion. I apologize for not participating and
wasting your time.
Sincerely,
Diana Scholtes
(503) 464-3807
-----Original Message-----
From: Symes, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question
Good afternoon, IT Wizards -
I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now
possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In
the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my
desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed
to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the
difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a
chance.
Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE]
June 12, 2001
Can't read this email? Click here
Issue#: e10806
PROVANTAGE Customer: [email protected]
To unsubscribe from the?
Original Advantage Click here
(Do Not Reply to this email)
Products that give you the Professional Advantage!
[IMAGE]
Crystal Reports v8.5 Developer Edition
By Crystal Decisions
$25 Instant Rebate through June 29, 2001! ORDER NOW!
??$364.53
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
PhotoSmart 618xi Digital Camera 2.11MP
By Hewlett Packard
2.11 Megapixel resolution with HP Imaging Technology; Pentax 3x optical zoom
lens, 2x digital zoom; Manual controls: aperture and shutter priority,
picture ...More
??$366.94
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
128MB Smart Media Card 3.3v
By Viking
Receive a $25 rebate direct from Viking Components when you purchase Viking
Part# SSFDC3/128 128MB Smart Media Card between June 1, 2001 and June 30,
2001. ...More
??$125.62
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
GoPrint/XL Printer Adapter
By AeroComm Inc.
Wireless printer-sharing system that allows up to 64 PCs to share up to 6
printers.
Print from up to 125 feet; eliminates the need for networking ...More
??$143.56
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
PYRO CardBus 1394DV for Notebooks
By ADS Technologies
Add 2 IEEE1394 ports to your Notebook
Capture and Edit Digital Video
Transfer data at 400 Mb/Sec.
Connect to Hard Drives, Printers, Scanners, ...More
??$78.95
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
New!
PhotoPC 3100Z Digital Camera 4.8Megapixel 6x Zoom
By Epson
Whatever you create, from snapshots to enlargements to web-ready video clips,
this digital camera has the tools you need to succeed. This high-value camera
...More
??$684.65
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
HipZip MP3 Player Kit USB w/2 40MB Disk, Head Phones
By Iomega
Get a $50 Rebate direct from Iomega from February 17, 2001 through June 30,
2001. ...More
??$172.94
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
IntelliFlash USB Flash Memory Reader
By Viking
Compact Flash is currently the world's smallest removable data storage system
based on flash technology. Compact Flash cards are about one third the size
...More
??$72.98
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Pocket CD98 24X Max USB (with USB Cable)
By Addonics
PocketCD98 is the "go anywhere" CD-ROM Drive that connects to any PC through
the PC Card (PCMCIA) slot or USB port. It's compact enough for any briefcase
...More
??$135.27
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Stylus Color 777 Ink Jet 2880x720 12ppm USB
By Epson
The EPSON Stylus Color 777 ink jet printer delivers remarkable print speed,
superb output and outstanding value. Ideal for home and home office, this
feature-rich ...More
??$74.94
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
PDC 640 Plus Digital Camera 640X480 VGA 8MB
By Polaroid
A mid-level digital camera with an LCD color display, multiple flash modes,
self-timer and a removable 8MB memory card.
??$149.30
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
New!
ZyWALL 10 Internet Security Gateway
By ZyXEL
The broadband network boom has changed how people use the Internet. Many
computers are wired to Internet 24 hours a day, and most of them are exposed
to ...More
??$264.94
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Que! Fire DVD-RAM 9.4 GB External FireWire 1394 Dr
By QPS Inc.
The Que! DVD-RAM Fire Drive is ideal for desktop publishing, archiving and
presentations. With the Que! DVD-RAM Fire Drive, DVD movies and MPEG-2 can be
...More
??$505.64
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
ML591 24-Pin 120V 360CPS Wide Parallel
By Okidata
Microline 590 and 591
OKISMART Paper Handling for hassle-free, reliable switching between different
media. This 24-pin dot matrix printer adjusts to ...More
??$596.99
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
OmniCube 4-Port KVM Switch
By Belkin
The Belkin OmniCube 4 Port KVM Switch is the most economical solution for
controlling four PS/2 computers from one keyboard, mouse and monitor. It
support ...More
??$99.55
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Caviar 40.0GB 7200RPM EIDE Ultra-ATA/100
By Western Digital
Western Digital's WD Caviar 7200 RPM EIDE hard drives are the performance
champions for advanced desktop personal computers. The latest drives achieve
...More
??$144.55
[IMAGE]
?
?
Web Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com?
?Toll Free: 800-336-1166???? Fax: 330-494-5260???? email:
[email protected]
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FREE Catalog
,2001 PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720
Products, prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time.
Company and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be
copyrighted by the product's manufacturer.?
The Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in the
past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout process. Or,
customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email List" box on the
PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any
time by going to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm. The email address
is permanently removed from additional promotional electronic mailings, and
will not be reactivated unless requested by the customer.??
[IMAGE]
BizRate Customer Certified (GOLD) Site | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I don't think I have this information. Do you? Lets talk. Thanks. DF
Eric Benson
02/08/2000 03:42 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron
Subject: RC Reports - Salary Allocations to Work Orders
To: Distribution
From: Eric Benson
In doing some research for Dorothy regarding salaries charged to work orders,
I was advised by Judy Lin and James Weitekamp with accounting, that we need
to provide Judy Lin with a payroll fixed percentage distribution by
employee. For example:
RC - 0237 Eric Benson .10 Navajo Work Order (work order number)
.90 salary charged to RC
The report to Judy should be for each employee within your respective RC's.
I have the allocation or percentages for Lou's RC but do not have the
percentages for Drew and Dorothy. If you like, please provide this
information to me and I will be happy to send the request on to Judy Lin in
accounting who will make all necessary corrections for January and February
payroll.
Eric | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 23; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041023.txt
---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: EPMI
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
TRADING_SC: PGAE
PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
PURCH_SALE: 2
DEAL_NO: 1 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
My group calendar is Power Group
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2001 04:01 PM -----
Elizabeth Sager 06/08/2001 03:54 PM To: Outlook Migration Team/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL
Outlook Migration Team@ENRON 06/07/2001 11:04 AM To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 2/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 4/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Meraz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alice Wright/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa Zucha/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL
Current Notes User:
To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration. Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send' Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.
Thank you.
Outlook 2000 Migration Team
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full Name: Elizabeth Sager
Login ID: esager
Extension: 36349
Office Location: 3805
What type of computer do you have? (Desktop, Laptop, Both) Desktop
Do you have a PDA? If yes, what type do you have: (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot, Jornada) No
Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?
If yes, who? No
Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?
If yes, who? Yes, my secretary, Alice Wright
Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
If yes, who? No
Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
If yes, who? Yes, my secretary, Alice Wright
Do you have access to a shared calendar?
If yes, which shared calendar? Yes
Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for mass mailings)?
If yes, please list here:
Address Books: Enron, Personal, ECT, EES, EI Lotus Notes, EC, Eott's, Azurix NAB, Transredes, MGUSA, New Power, Local Address Books.
Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use: ECT Sec Resource, ECT Bulletin Boards, Catalog 5.0, Personal Web Navigator, Development Center, ECT Legal Foreign and Domestic, New Power Contracts, On Local, Journal on Local, Favorites on Local, Finanical Trading Agreement, ECT Technical Support for SRRS.
Media - Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Carthage Today
In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will need to know:
What are your normal work hours? From: 9:00 a.m. To: 4:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday.
Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
If so, when? From (MM/DD/YY): To (MM/DD/YY):
<Embedded StdOleLink> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please include the following terms within an annex b. This modification
should allow us to proceed with confirmation.
thanks
Brant
-----Original Message-----
From: Aguayo, Janie
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Panus, Stephanie
Cc: Bailey, Derek
Subject: QX7453 and QX7554
Please see below for deal detail. - Janie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Make a Reservation On Time AWA is #1 America West ranks number one in on-time performance among all major carriers as recorded in the latest Air Travel Consumer Report published by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Learn more . Spring Training Spring Training in Arizona Arizona is the home to Cactus league spring training. This year's training schedule begins Wednesday, 2/27/02 and ends on Sunday, 3/31/02. Get away from the daily grind and let America West "take you out to the ball game." View Details America West Vacations Vacation Packages for Baseball Fans Catch the excitement of Spring Training with America West Vacations. Cheer on your favorite teams right here in Phoenix with reduced rates on packages that include both air and hotel for as low as $390 for three nights. Plan your spring training vacation now! Fare Sales [IMAGE] Nationwide Fare Sales Take advantage of great roundtrip fares from $78 to $398 to many America West destinations all across the USA. View Details LA, Las Vegas, San Francisco Sales Save on off-peak travel from Las Vegas, Los Angeles or San Francisco to select America West destinations nationwide. View Details Lone Star State Sale Everything is bigger in Texas, including the savings. Check out these great fares between America West destinations in Texas and other cities across the country. View Details Ticketmaster ticketmaster Weekend Surf'n Go Sports Fares February 23-26, 2002 Support your favorite team on the road or attend a great cultural event out of town next weekend with Surf'n Go Sports. These specials are for events between 2/23 - 2/26/02. Professional Basketball [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Golden State at Chicago Bay Area, CA* Chicago, IL (ORD) $198 Indiana at Golden State Indianapolis, IN Bay Area, CA* $218 Los Angeles at Indiana Los Angeles Area, CA* Indianapolis, IN $178 Portland at Philadelphia Portland, OR Philadelphia, PA $258 Sacramento at Dallas Sacramento, CA Dallas/Ft Worth, TX $178 San Antonio at Phoenix San Antonio, TX Phoenix, AZ $158 College Basketball - Men [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Colorado St. at Colorado Springs, CO Albuquerque, NM $118 New Mexico Denver, CO Albuquerque, NM $118 Fresno St. at SMU Fresno, CA Dallas/Ft Worth, TX $178 San Diego St. at UNLV San Diego, CA Las Vegas, NV $78 USC at California Los Angeles Area, CA* Bay Area, CA* $98 College Basketball - Women [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Boise St. at Texas El Paso Boise, ID El Paso, TX $168 California at USC Bay Area, CA* Los Angeles Area, CA* $98 Stanford at UCLA Bay Area, CA* Los Angeles Area, CA* $98 Boxing [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Paulie Ayala vs. San Antonio, TX Las Vegas, NV $148 Clarence Adams St. Louis, MO Las Vegas, NV $178 Kansas City, MO Las Vegas, NV $178 Omaha, NE Las Vegas, NV $178 Wichita, KS Las Vegas, NV $178 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Las Vegas, NV $148 Rafael Marquez vs. Miami, FL Las Vegas, NV $198 Mark Johnson Tampa, FL Las Vegas, NV $198 Baltimore, MD Las Vegas, NV $198 Washington, DC (DCA) Las Vegas, NV $198 Chicago, IL (ORD) Las Vegas, NV $198 Professional Golf [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares PGA Tour: Tucson Open San Francisco, CA Tucson, AZ $178 Seattle, WA Tucson, AZ $178 Portland, OR Tucson, AZ $178 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Tucson, AZ $178 Houston, TX (IAH) Tucson, AZ $178 Chicago, IL (ORD) Tucson, AZ $208 St. Louis, MO Tucson, AZ $208 Minn/St. Paul, MN Tucson, AZ $208 PGA Tour: Accenture Albuquerque, NM San Diego Area, CA* $98 Match Play El Paso, TX San Diego Area, CA* $98 Chicago, IL (ORD) San Diego Area, CA* $208 St. Louis, MO San Diego, CA $208 Minn/St. Paul, MN San Diego, CA $208 Phoenix, AZ San Diego Area, CA* $78 Tucson, AZ San Diego Area, CA* $78 Las Vegas, NV San Diego Area, CA* $78 Atlanta, GA San Diego Area, CA* $208 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX San Diego Area, CA* $178 Houston, TX (IAH) San Diego Area, CA* $178 Denver, CO San Diego Area, CA* $178 Colorado Springs, CO San Diego Area, CA* $178 Miami, FL San Diego, CA $208 Professional Tennis [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Sybase Open Phoenix, AZ Bay Area, CA* $138 Tucson, AZ Bay Area, CA* $138 Albuquerque, NM Bay Area, CA* $138 Las Vegas, NV Bay Area, CA* $108 Denver, CO Bay Area, CA* $178 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Bay Area, CA* $178 Houston, TX (IAH) Bay Area, CA* $178 Cultural Events [IMAGE] Event Departure City Destination City Fares Concert: Billy Joel and Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Philadelphia, PA $158 Elton John Columbus, OH Philadelphia, PA $138 Chicago, IL (ORD) Philadelphia, PA $138 Concert: Crosby, Stills, Columbus, OH New York, NY (LGA) $158 Nash and Young Columbus, OH Newark, NJ $158 Chicago, IL (ORD) New York, NY (LGA) $158 Chicago, IL (ORD) Newark, NJ $158 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX New York, NY (LGA) $178 Dallas/Ft Worth, TX Newark, NJ $178 *Bay Area, CA typically includes the San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland airports, but availability may vary by destination. *Los Angeles Area, CA typically includes the Los Angeles, Burbank, Ontario, Orange/Santa Ana and Long Beach airports, but availability may vary by destination. *San Diego Area, CA includes the San Diego and Carlsbad airports. Surf'n Go Sports Terms and Conditions: Purchase Ticket By: Friday, 2/22/02, 9:00pm PST Travel Outbound: Saturday, 2/23/02 Travel Return: Monday, 2/25/02 or Tuesday, 2/26/02 Travel On: Flights operated by America West and America West Express Purchased Through: americawest.com Ticket Refundability: Non- refundable Itinerary Changes: Subject to fare availability, $100 change fee, and difference in fare if applicable Minimum Stay: 2 nights Black Out Dates: None Routing: Roundtrip only, Routing restrictions may apply Other Discounts: Not combinable with any other discount Seat Inventory: Limited - subject to availability Federal Excise Tax: A $3 per flight segment Federal Excise Tax and a $2.50 per flight segment US Security Fee, up to a maximum of $10 per roundtrip, (begining 2/1/02) will be applied. A segment is defined as a take-off and landing Passenger Facility Charges: Up to $20 per person, depending on itinerary You have received this message because you subscribed to the Surf'n Go messaging service at americawest.com. To unsubscribe to this weekly mailing, please visit http://www.americawest.com/specials/sp_subscribe.asp . This email was sent to: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'm still on it. We are still working on the term sheet.
From: Robert Sevitz 03/14/2001 12:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Coop City
Kay
Were you involved in the Coop City meeting/conference call this morning, and
if so, was any progress made in defining the business deal so that we can get
started with documentation?
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The deal was done between Mark and Janice at SRP. I heard him make the call. Also, do you have any more avenues with PAC tranny like a supervisor or something. I am not really in a position to negotiate with anyone. They all claim that they can't change the Oasis system.
-----Original Message-----
From: Purcell, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Salisbury, Holden
Subject: SRP deal 805316
Holden,
SRP is comming back saying that they do not see deal 805316 on 9/12. Can you look into this
Thanks
Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
David,
How about 400 this afternoon? I have another call at 230, but it should be
over by then.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman 08/14/2000 09:05 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Hub Agency Commercial issues
Kay - attached is Roy's writeup on our Hub Agency discussion last week. Let
me know what your schedule looks like today. If you have time, I would like
to go through this with you and David to get your thoughts and kick-off the
drafting.
Thanks,
Gregg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi..... Stan, if you need us to move the Houston meeting around, let me know. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walia, Amit
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:22 PM
To: David" "Munoz (E-mail); Matthew" "Harris (E-mail); Umanoff, Adam
Cc: Metts, Mark
Subject: FW: Agenda
FYI. We have not yet sent this to Candover as we are waiting for confirmation on Stan's availability.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walia, Amit
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Metts, Mark
Subject: Agenda | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
[IMAGE]Unsubscribe at bottom
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Click here to download FREE Collapse demo! [IMAGE]
remove me privacy policy You received this e-mail because you downloaded a RealPlayer
, RealJukebox
, or another product from Real.com? and indicated a preference to receive special offers from RealNetworks
, or you subscribed to the Special Offers e-mail category in your account area. If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the "remove me" link above. RealNetworks, RealPlayer, RealJukebox, Real.com, and RealArcade are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Martin, Nicole and Marcus,
This will confirm our telephone conference of today's date. Again, you
authorized me to go forward immediately with the recommendation set forth in
the attached Word document. I will accordingly contact Scottsboro today and
get the ball rolling.
Britt
P.S. to Richard--I just left you a voice-mail on this. Marcus is fully up to
speed if you can't catch me (my day today is pretty crazy). I plan to
contact Scottsboro after lunch to go forward with this.
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 10:47 AM -----
Lee Carrier
12/11/2000 03:55 PM
To: Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: In re: ICTS-Alabama Carriers vs. Scottsboro Aluminum, L.L.C. and
International Commodity Transportation Services, L.L.C.
Attached please find a memo regarding the above-referenced matter from Britt
K. Davis. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Davis at (713)
853-6307. Thank you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We have not made public the SCE amount (as far as I'm aware). We need to make sure that IR is in the loop - I think that Mark Koenig is following this issue.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Mahoney, Peggy
Subject: SCE Stip
Have we disclosed the $125 million SCE number in any other filing that you can recall that is public. At the FERC maybe? We are considering including it in our stip to be filed at the CPUC. Peggy, would this be a problem? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009842&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000009842
Request Create Date : 12/11/00 11:44:19 AM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : EOL US Backoffice Stack Manager
Resource Type : Applications | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks. Suzanne just gave me the documents. I like having the electronic
versions as well.
I can't believe it feels so good to be back. I must be crazy.
Kay
"Campbell, Carolyn" <[email protected]> on 01/02/2001 09:07:05 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Keffer, John" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CA Energy Development LLC documents
<<2R6L18!.DOC>> <<2RM309!.DOC>> <<2RLS10!.DOC>> <<2R6K13!.DOC>>
<<2RSW04!.DOC>>
Kay:
Electronic copies of execution drafts of the following documents are
attached:
1. Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development I LLC;
2. Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II LLC for the
turbine;
3. Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II LLC for the
transformer;
4. First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
for CA Energy Development I LLC; and
5. First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
for CA Energy Development II LLC.
The originals of these documents were forwarded by courier to your office on
Friday. I will deliver the original Guaranty Agreements to you today. Let
me know if you need anything else. Thank you.
Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Campbell, Carolyn
Subject: CA documents
Hi Carolyn,
Please email me the execution version of the documents
signed last week, as
well as the current version of the other documents. Were
the originals put
in the mail? My assistant isn't here, so I can't tell what
I have yet.
Thanks,
Kay
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
- 2R6L18!.DOC
- 2RM309!.DOC
- 2RLS10!.DOC
- 2R6K13!.DOC
- 2RSW04!.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:33 PM
To: McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Doner, Max; Concannon, Ruth; Germany, Chris
Subject: FW: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
Ed,
There was an outage on MOPS in Feb 2002 that impacted how much gas ENA received from Dominion (Louis Dreyfus deal #30468). We paid Dominion for 100,000 dth and we invoiced Tallahassee for 100,000 dth. After the month was over, we discovered that we actually received 104,793 dth. We billed Tallahassee for the incremental volume and they paid for it. Is it ok to generate a payment to Dominion for the additional volumes [$10,334.67 = 4,793 dth x $2.1562]. Tallahassee paid us $14,570.72 for the gas [4,793 x $3.04].
If yes, I would like to have Phil show the payment of $10,334.67 to be made next Friday while I work on the cash request.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Hamic, Priscilla; Dhont, Margaret
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Sanchez, Christina; McMichael Jr., Ed; Parks, Joe; Dinari, Sabra L.; Germany, Chris
Subject: FW: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
Per David Walker at Dominion - for February, his supplier said we received 104,793 dth. Using my calculation down below, we paid Dominion (and billed Tallahassee) for 100,000 dth. I would like to verify that Tallahassee received 104,793 dth, then bill Tallahassee for the additional 4,793 dth and pay Dominion for the same amount.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
thx
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Hamic, Priscilla
Subject: FW: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
<< File: Dominion Prepay (1.29.02 for $603,736)_update.doc >>
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Sewell, Doug; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Barbe, Robin
Subject: RE: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
I just went over the March prepayment with David Walker (405-749-5240) at Dominion. On Thursday, ENA will wire $280,306.00 to Dominion. The Force Majeure event has ended and Dominion will resume deliveries effective 2/26/02. We are assuming Dominion did not deliver any gas for Feb 8th through Feb 25th, 18 days. Following are my calculations
Prepay for March 2002 10,000 dth per day x 31 days x $2.1562 = $668,422.00
Non deliveries for Feb 2002 10,000 dth per day x 18 days x $2.1562 = ($388,116.00)
Amount to wire on 2/28/02 ==> $280,306.00
There may have been some gas flow on Feb 8th, but David will let us know about that later.
Doug, do I need to prepare a new Cash Use Approval Request form?
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Sewell, Doug; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Barbe, Robin
Subject: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
I'm requesting the prepay for Dominion for March 2002. I printed out the request, signed it, and gave it to Doug. I just want everyone to be aware of what is happening with Dominion. Dominion is still not delivering the gas to Tallahassee due to a Force Majeure event. We are expecting gas to flow any day, hopefully by the weekend.
Eric, I left a message for David Walker (405-749-5240) at Dominion to call me about the prepayment amount. Following are my calculations
Prepay for March 2002 10,000 dth per day x 31 days x $2.1562 = $668,422
Non deliveries for Feb 2002 10,000 dth per day x 14 days x $2.1562 = ($301,868)
Estimated payment due 2/28/02 $366,554
As of today Mops has been down from Feb 8th - 21st, 14 days. Mops may not come up until the weekend or early next week. I will adjust the prepayment as needed next week.
<< File: Dominion Prepay (1.29.02 for $603,736)_update.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 01:12 PM -----
Karen Denne
03/13/2001 11:54 AM
To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Revised Merger Release & Q&A
fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001
11:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Diane Bazelides@AZURIX on 03/13/2001 11:45 AM
To: Elizabeth Ivers/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Revised Merger Release & Q&A
Here are the latest documents. We plan to issue the release immediately
after the meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 10 on Friday and probably
lasting less than 30 minutes. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Regards,
Bill x53492
-----Original Message-----
From: Schott, Samuel
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:07 PM
To: Crooks, William
Cc: Smith, Will
Subject: RE: New Trader - George Phillips
Hello Bill,
Your request is complete, effective upon refresh of the EnPower System. (refreshed nightly)
Will,
Would you check EnPower to assure that George Phillips is 'visible' in deal blotter
this morning, Tuesday, 10/23/01??
As usual, thanks Will.
Best Rgds.
Samuel (713) 853-9890
Enron Net Works _ Global Counterparty
(Houston Operations)
-----Original Message-----
From: Crooks, William
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Schott, Samuel
Subject: New Trader - George Phillips
Samuel:
We have a trader named George Phillips who needs to be mapped to the desks EPMI Hourly Ercot and EPMI Ercot Asset in deal blotter. My blotter expert (Kroum Kroumov) tells me that Phillips should be mapped to those desks in CRD_PEOPLE_CD. Are you the person who could take a look at this for me? I would really appreciate it.
Regards,
Bill x53492 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a FERC order accepting our rate schedule, allowing us to sell
power to PDE without prior FERC approval. Note well, this tariff will not
become effective until the Sierra Pacific/PGE merger is consummated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 02/12/2001 08:02 AM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Wenner, Adam" <[email protected]>
02/12/2001 07:00 AM
To: "'Hain, Mary'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Enron Power Marketing
Mary --
Attached is a link to the Commission's letter order accepting the EPMI et
al. rate schedule filings (to exclude PGE Codes of Conduct.)
http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/WP/ELECTRIC/ER/ER01-753.00A.WPD
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this
email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and
delete this email from your system. Thank You
>
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Van,
Thanks for your message. We are taking a number of interns this summer, but
the A&A
program has closed the books for this year. We were able to reopen the list
to add one candidate a few weeks ago, but cannot do it again. We promised it
would be the last addition.
Vince
Van Ngo <[email protected]> on 04/23/2000 11:42:54 AM
To: Vince Kaminski <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: summer
Dear Vince,
I'm writing to let you know that I have been in touch with Christy Young from
the A&A Program and will be finding out my assignment for this summer soon.?
I am very excited to be back at Enron, and I hope to see the Research team
again.
I'd also like to inquire about summer positions within Research.? Will the
Research group be taking on another intern this summer?? Since I know there
is no busier place at Enron than the Research Group, if there is a position
available for this summer that you are looking to fill or that may be open
for consideration, I would love to connect you to another Rice student.
Please let me know if the Group is considering receiving a new intern this
summer.? If so, I would be thrilled to put you in touch with Brad Aimone, a
senior chemical engineering student here at Rice who will be graduating with
both his B.S. and his Masters in Chemical Engineering next May.? Brad has
gained extensive laboratory research experience over the past two years.? His
academic focus gives him a strong mathematical, quantitative background and
excellent computer skills.? I believe his skills are transferable and
relevant to the Group, and he is a deeply dedicated individual.? If the
Research Group is looking for a summer intern, I hope it will continue
Enron's strong support and recruit of Rice University students.
Please feel free to contact Brad directly to pursue this discussion. (As I
realize the summer months are not far off, if it is easier, an arrangement
through ProStaff may be made similar to my work extension at the end of last
summer).? I have attached a copy of his resume for your review.? Brad will be
in Houston this summer.? His contact information is given below.
James Bradley (Brad) Aimone
6320 Main, Houston, TX? 77005
713-630-8035
[email protected]
?
Also, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.? I sincerely
hope that you will have the opportunity to discover the contributions Brad
can make to the Research Group.? I certainly know that he would gain
tremendously from the experience as I did last summer.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Van
Ph: 713-630-8038
- Brad_Resume.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
look at first document
Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349
-----Original Message-----
From: Portz, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:43 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: AEP
Importance: High
As discussed, (1) current draft of master setoff agreement: Recall that distinction needs to be made between parent in defined terms "AEP" and "AEPSC"
throughout the doucment
(2) Mary Cook redline of Master Netting Agreement, circa 11-6-01, showing what was sheared out when CSA is removed:
(3) Current Mary Cook from Master Netting Agr with CSA:
For roadmap as to what has changed since AEP draft roughed out from standard format vintage 11-6-01, see Mary Cook e-mail of late this afternoon, which tracks updateing changes. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.
(See attached file: heatspread33.pdf)(See attached file:
unleadspread33.pdf)
- heatspread33.pdf
- unleadspread33.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Gibner, Stinson
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Borgman, Laine; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: D-G Energy Software Procurement
Laine,
Enclosed is a revised copy of the Software Licence Agreement with D-G Energy. The earlier version had prices and conditions of use which differed from what had been discussed over the telephone. This version brings into line the terms with what has been agreed upon, and has been given tentative approval by the president of D-G, who I met with last week.
I have highlighed the sections which have changed from the version that you sent out for signature last November.
I assume that the revised document will have to be reviewed by legal again. Let me know if I can be of any assistance in this process.
Regards,
Stinson Gibner | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:46 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: B Scott Palmer 10/30/2000 12:22 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jackson
Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!
This is sweet.
---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:19 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: B Scott Palmer 06/13/2000 10:39 AM
To: B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!
---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Rebecca S Mize 07/21/99 04:22 PM
To: Jessica V Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott
Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca S Mize/HOU/ECT on 07/21/99 04:21
PM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Mize, Jeffrey N." <[email protected]> 07/21/99
12:19 PM
To: "'Carla Homer'" <[email protected]>, "Bell, Carole"
<[email protected]>, "Johnson, Jana B." <[email protected]>, "'Jimbo
Chambers'" <[email protected]>, "Boysen, Karl"
<[email protected]>, "Swift, Lauren" <[email protected]>, "Kowis,
Lisa R." <[email protected]>, "Rhame, Liz" <[email protected]>,
"'Michelle Birsinger'" <[email protected]>, "Peikert, Quintin W."
<[email protected]>, Rebecca S Mize/HOU/ECT, "'David Grissom'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: For you professional drinkers!!
Here's something useful.
> <<100pr.exe>>
- 100pr.exe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the Additional list of GCP sign-offs on Clickpaper approval for
10-17-00
P.S. Counterparty is set up in GCP as "Bloch Lumber Company". Per
counterparty Credit dept., D&B, and CP website, that is the correct name.
From: Karen Lambert@ECT on 10/17/2000 02:31 PM
To: Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bloch Lumber amendmeny
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 02:30
PM ---------------------------
Walter Guidroz@ENRON
10/17/2000 12:17 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bloch Lumber amendmeny
Attached is an amendment to open Block Lumber Company, Inc. to trade both
financial and physical. The original had them trading only within physical.
Please call if you have any questions. Thanks.
Walter | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 08:14 PM -----
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
02/02/2001 01:46 PM
To: Mike Day <[email protected]>, Sandra McCubbin <[email protected]>,
Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Rate Freeze
Edison has agreed to support Enron's legislative language regarding the
rate freeze. I forwarded this information to Joe Lyons in Rod Wright's
office. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As many of you know, I am going to be leaving Enron to pursue new
opportunities.
I am leaving with regret, as I have enjoyed working with all of you, and I
believe EBS
is poised for great success in Asia. To assist in a smooth transition, I
have prepared
this report on the status of all EBS East Asia regulatory affairs actions
I am working on,
and my thoughts about next steps. A list of key contacts is also
provided. Mark
Schroeder will reassign pending actions.
Again, many, many thanks for your support and encouragement and for what I
have
learned about broadband and EBS from each of you.
1. Singapore
(a) SBO License Application:
The application was completed in draft in December. Dan Arzola of
EBS Asia
has a copy in Houston. We cannot proceed further on the application
until we
decide what legal entity to use. We have a legal entity (Enron
Broadband
Services Pte Ltd) set up that encompasses all EBS activities
including bandwidth t
trading.
The legal entity that we use in the application will have to pay a 1%
annual gross
turnover fee unless we get it waived by the regulator on the grounds
that the
turnover fee was never intended to capture bandwidth trading
revenue. This
is a possible option in my opinion as the regulator (IDA) does not
want to be working at cross
purposes with other parts of the government that wish to provide EBS
with incentives.
See below.
(b) Legal Due Diligence:
However, before pursuing a waiver from IDA, we were planning to
complete legal due
diligence to examine any options for avoiding the fee without a
waiver.
Donald is of the view (see his Jan 9 e-mail ) that bandwidth trading
has to be
licensed by the regulator. ( In Europe, bandwidth trading usually
does not
require telecom licensing.) If Donald is correct as he probably is,
there may be
less need of further legal research on that point unless perhaps to
confirm absolutely
that there is no way to shield EBS bandwidth trading from the
turnover fee apart from
a waiver or reduction of the fee. For example it is possible that
Jan Haizmann
or others may figure out a way to have actual trades escape the fee
(done offshore
for example). Jan I believe has some ideas on this that he adanced
in the context
of Korea.
I believe it would still be prudent to proceed as we had planned to
engage
a law firm here in Singapore (as we have in Hong Kong and Japan) for
the purpose
of guiding us through these sorts of questions (or at least
confirming our reading)
and answering the many other questions posed in a matrix developed by
a working
group headed by Wayne Gardner. We will likely be needing the firm
anyway at
some point.
I have prepared a list of seven law firms engaged in telecoms
practice in Singapore.
EBS General Counsel is planning to examine its Asia strategy and whom
to send and
when to engage a firm to complete Wayne's questionnaire and for other
purposes.
My advice is, after the due diligence is completed or we have at
least confirmed
that bandwidth trading is required to be in the licensed entity,
probably to go to the IDA and
discuss the implications of the fee for us. The contacts I would
suggest discussing this
with are Andy Haire and Fiona Yeo (see contact list).] IDA does
not wish to prevent
EBS's coming to Singapore, and the fee was of course set up without
bandwidth trading
specifically in mind as a revenue source. Bandwidth trading was
referenced in the
Code only later as a result of Enron's comment letters.
(c) Arthur D Little consultant proposal to support EBS Pioneer Status
Application
This 75k proposal is now with us in final form, after undergoing
changes by me
and two by our Houston tax lawyers. I was to have gone to ADL
Singapore next
for a meeting to question them on how much of this they are able to
do independently without reliance on us. This was a suggestion
made by
Jim Ginty of EBS tax to make sure they would not be reprocessing our
info,
I also intended to get them to pinpoint which of the products would
be quantified,
rather than a "where appropriate." Assuming we proceed with this
proposal,
someone else will need to do this conversation with ADL Singapore.
I have forwarded the final proposal to Wayne Garder and Mark and
most other
interested parties earlier this week.
NB: Someone needs to be appointed to contact Simon MacCormac at ADL
and explain
at least our timing and process for getting back to him, as a
courtesy. I have not
replied to his final submission as of now. See contact info at end
of e-mail.
For background, the reason I believe EBS needs this work and sought
a consultant
proposal is that Pioneer Status is typically awarded to companies
that make major
dollar, infrastructure, and job-creation expenditures in
Singapore. Our business
model does just the opposite. So, to be awarded Pioneer Status,
which the EDB is
very willing to consider us for after many months of persuasion, I
believe we need to
help EDB demonstrate what the quantitative spin-off benefits are for
Singapore from our
developing bandwidth trading here (e.g. increased efficiencies of
capacity utilization,
effect of lower bandwidth prices on attracting investment). This
is a job for a development
economist teamed with someone who knows about bandwidth trading.
To my mind,
if ADL cannot produce the bandwidth trading specialist we want, it
might be worth it
to have one of our experts assigned to liaise with them, and adjust
the contract
accordingly to reflect what part we are providing.
One thing the ADL scope of work does not provide for is the actual
completion of
the Pioneer Status Application - only the supporting economic
analysis. That is because it is
proper for us to be the ones outlining our business plan for
Singapore, rather than
running that information through ADL and charging its overhead. The
idea is to get
ADL to perform the quantitative economic development analysis we
cannot do in-house.
(d) Direct contact with EDB on EBS's plans
EDB (Chelsia Lim ) has this week asked EBS to update her on its
business
plans for Singapore. I have made sure Craig Clark will take the
responsibility
for seeing this is handled. While a courtesy call is fine, I would
advise
not to brief her formally until EBS has really decided what our
plans are,
with staffing, etc. They have been asking for our plans for a
while, and
are waiting for some specifics when we have them.
2. Hong Kong
We have 2 licenses: IVANS (value added services) and ETS (external
telecoms services (includes bandwidth trading).
There are several documents in draft and clearance which need to be
filed
under these licenses before we are able to operate in Hong Kong.
The principal ones are (a) the system configuration plan, (b) the
tariff for
sale and trading of circuits under the ETS license (c) the tariff for
Mediacast
services under the IVANS license, and (later) (d) a tariff for
VOD/EOD to
be filed under the IVANS license.
(a) status of system configuration plan:
The plan is done in draft and is being held pending a decision to be
communicated by Roger Estrada within the next week or two as to
whether
the Lucent 10G equipment described in the plan will be changed to
other
equipment. The HK lawyers (Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance)
have said
that if we plan to provide other equipment at the outset, we ought
to just
wait and send in the correct description rather than revise. If we
do stick with
the Lucent equipment , we will also need to revise our orginal
license
application as well (says Michelle Chan) to include description of
related
Cisco equipment that was not mentioned in our orginal license
application.
When the system configuration plan is done in final, we also need to
change the listed destination in the diagram from "San Jose" to
"West Coast
USA, Japan, Singapore, and Australia".
There are two copies of the present draft submission typed on the
OFTA forms.
I have given one to Craig Clark of EBS to carry back to Houston.
The other
copy is with Annie Ng in our Singapore office.
When we know what equipment we are going to be using, Tom Wei needs
to
revise the diagram and also make the changes in destination referred
to above.
Other small edits need to be made in Appendix A (see Dec 28 e-mail
referenced
below). My successor should review the whole package once more
with Michelle
Chan in final. Then the final package needs to be cleared by
Anthony Duenner
and our EBS lawyers before going to Ken Rice or another qualified
Director of
our Hong Kong company for signature. After that it goes back to
Michelle Chan
for filing with OFTA.
NB: See Michelle Chan's e-mail of Dec 28, being repeated
separately, for
further information.
(b) Tariffs for BWTrading under ETS License
In December in Houston I worked with Bill White and his staff on a
tariff plan for
bandwidth trading in HK. Based on a meeting I had with the
regulator in Hong
Kong, we agreed to file pro forma ceiling prices rather than an
entirely new
and variable system which the regulator insisted we not do.
Ceiling prices
were developed and submitted to Michelle Chan for review.
Along with the prices we are required to submit our Terms and
Conditions. For
that I used EBS General Terms and Conditions (GTC's) for trading
obtained from
Robbi Rossi and Michelle Heard. Mike Grimes has a set as well.
Present status: Right now a dialogue is under way between Michelle
Chan and
Robbi Rossi as to whether it is sufficient to file the GTC's alone or
whether
certain exhibits, service level agreements, and confirmations
referred to in
the GTC's must also be filed. There are other questions being
discussed in
that channel such as how to handle variations in the terms based on
commercial dynamics. All these e-mails will be forwarded. Once
these
issues related to the GTCs are resolved, the tariff for bandwidth
trading should
be filed, going through Michelle Chan.
NB: See Michelle Chan e-mail of 1/09/01 which being forwarded
separately.
(c) Tariff for Media Cast under IVANS license:
I worked with Leroy Ho and Ken Wang in December and we submitted the
main
part of the Media Cast tariff to Michelle Chan. However, we still
need to get the
Terms and Conditions for Media Cast from Robbi Rossi or Michelle Heard
and
attach them to the tariff diagrams and submit them to Michelle Chan.
NB: See my e-mail to Michelle Chan of Dec 21 which being repeated.
Someone needs to work with EBS legal to get the T and C's for Media
Cast to Michelle
or to set up direct channel between EBS legal and Michelle Chan as in
the case of the exchanges on the T and C's for Bandwidth trading
referred
to above.
(d) Overall change of responsibility for EBS Regulatory HK
Michael, or whomever will be taking over these responsibilities,
should
get from Michelle Chan of Clifford Chance Hong Kong a fresh copy of
Alison Lindsay's letter to Xi Xi of October 2000 stating that we
received
our licenses and setting forth in detail all of the requirements.
This is the
master document ("bible") on compliance under our licenses and will
catch any
detail not included above. For example:
- my successor should also file a new form with OFTA, the Hong
Kong
regulator (form is included in the attachments to the letter)
naming
himself the point of contact, replacing me. Michelle Chan
can forward
the letter to the regulator.
- we will need to be selecting an independent auditor to certify
certain routine
reports we may need to file in future. I have not started on
that.
3. Korea
Robbi Rossi needs to call Kim and Chang (law firm we use in Korea)
to authorize them to research and provide advice to us on how to
handle
the apparent regulatory impediment to Bandwidth Trading in Korea that
we identified during my November trip.
Once Kim and Chang starts work on this, someone from regulatory should
be made available to help guide Kim and Chang on our regulatory
questions, in coordination with Robbi Rossi.
The key e-mails are (a) one from me outlining the overall problem and
some suggestions for dealing with it ; (b) one from Jan Haizmann
with
some additional and in some cases alternative suggestions on how
to deal with it, (c) two from Jae Moo Lee in Korea with additional
points of view. These will be forwarded.
4. Japan
Our regulatory consultant is Art Yanagawa. Contact info below. Mike
Grimes
and I have been in meetings with him and Mike is fully briefed to
carry on the
on-the-ground part of contacts with Art. Art also responds to
Donald and
Roger Estrada and relies on them for guidance and input.
At some point it should be thought through who should be the point
person
to manage this contract and approve payments, or decide to leave things
as they are with approvals done in Houston. The present system works
but
it is not clear to me who is responsible for what.
Art has prepared the amendment to our Special Type 2 license to add
service to other destinations. The latest status was that he was
holding
the amendment over the holidays while clarifying some points raised by
Mike Grimes. Someone needs to be assigned responsibility for
getting the amendment through.
General Concern:
A more general regulatory concern for us in Japan is that our
consultant
advises us that we cannot use the term bandwidth trading in
communications with the government because it is not something
contemplated in the Telecom Business Law, so is prohibited if
stated as we would state it elsewhere.
We therefore are having to go through elaborate contortions to make
what we are planning to do actually look like we are doing something
else. I admit that I agree with the approach we are taking for now
and
can offer nothing better for the immediate term.
However, I would say that long term we are running some risks. If we
are going to make Japan one of the centerpieces of our Asia EBS
strategy, I think we need to consider devoting more full time EBS
regulatory resources to Japan exclusively.
The allocation problem is that whatever regulatory resources we apply
have to focus on immediate license amendment and operational
questions that drive out time to work effectively on long term
issues such as how to go about amending the Telecommunications
Business Law to allow bandwidth trading explicitly. This would seem
important to reduce long term risks to our business strategy.
5. "Digital Divide"
I had been giving intermittent support to helping Scott Yeager and
Justin
Cornett of EBS, and Will Reed of Technology for All, figure out how
to expand the concept of Technology for All to Asia. The strategy
was to utilize some of Japan's $15 billion pledge of funds to support
digital divide activities in Asia - to support the expansion into Asia
of
the EBS-supported TFA model. This work will cease unless it can
be picked up by Laura Lannarone of corporate social responsbility
or Steve Burns of the DC office.
6. KEY CONTACTS for operational items in this memo:
(a) SBO License: InfoCom Development Authority of Singapore
(1) Ms. Fiona Yeo, Asst Dir Competiton - 211-1824
(2) Mr. Andrew Haire - Senior Director Policy and Regulation -
211-1731
(3) Ms Hema Ramnani - Manager- Policy 211-1860
(4) Ms Aileen Chia, Deputy Director, Economic Regulation - 211-1883
(5) Ms Ng Cher Keng, Director, Policy - 211-1828
(b) Pioneer Tax Status: Economic Development Board
(1) Chelsia LIM - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6676
<[email protected]>
(2) Bernard NEE - Head, Infocomms and Media - 832-6964
(3) Sean LOW - Senior Officer Infocomms and Media - 832-6260
<[email protected]>
(4) LEE Eng Keat - same as above - 832-6006
(c) Arthur D Little proposal
(1) Simon MacCormac - Associate Director
297-2300
<[email protected]>
(2) Peter J Connell - Vice President
207-2300
<[email protected]>
(d) Hong Kong License filings:
(1) Michelle Chan 852-2825-8888
<[email protected]>
(2) Alison Lindsay
<[email protected]>
(3) OFTA: M.H. Au
Senior Asst Director (Regulation)
852-2961-6688
<[email protected]>
(e) Japan Telecom regulatory consultant to EBS:
Art Yanagawa
81-3-5418-7056
<[email protected]>
David
for example, the option of whether we can break bandwidth trading
functions
out of the entity | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I believe CPE stands for "Continuing Professional Education." Basically, some certifications (CPA, CFA, Legal) require a person to complete a minimum number of training hours to keep the certification current. A CPE hour goes toward filling that requirement.
-Grace
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams III, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Rodriguez, Grace
Subject: RE: CPE Certificates for Derivatives courses
Grace,
What is a CPE certificate?
B
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriguez, Grace
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:57 AM
To: Harasin, Leaf; Guzman, Mark; Solberg, Geir; Linder, Eric; Salisbury, Holden; Woodland, Andrea; Frost, David; Guillaume, David; Law, Samantha; Eriksson, Fredrik; Cadena, Angela; Bryson, Jesse; Oh, Jeffrey; Wente, Laura; Clark, Ed; Buerkle, Jim; Shaw, Garet; '[email protected]'; Williams III, Bill; Slinger, Ryan; Meyers, Albert; Bruce, James; Dunton, Heather; Stathis, Kristin; Lobdell, Jim; Purcell, Mike; Calvert, Gray; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject: CPE Certificates for Derivatives courses
Howdy all!
Just an FYI: If you are interested in applying your Derivatives Course(s) to a particular certification as CPE hours AND have completed Derivatives I and/or II, please let me know. I will arrange to have a CPE certificate sent to the office in your name.
Thanks,
Grace
x8321
====
P.S. Samantha: I've already added you to the list! :o) --G | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You're not old silly!
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:10 PM
To: Rybarski, Amanda
Subject: RE:
thats what happens when you get old
-----Original Message-----
From: Rybarski, Amanda
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
Hell yeah! I was going for the Patriots too! So I was really pissed when I kept falling asleep!
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Rybarski, Amanda
Subject: RE:
i thouht i was going to be miserable because if the rams won i would have lost alot of money and most of the guys going to the game needed the rams to win, and the seats werent that great
-----Original Message-----
From: Rybarski, Amanda
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
Wow! I can't believe you bailed and came home!! What possessed you to do that?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Rybarski, Amanda
Subject: RE:
i was in new orleans all weekend but i decided to come home and watch the game because i had a bunch of money on it and there were about 20 of us going to the game so i bailed and came home. it was a fun weekend though, we went to a good party on friday that maxim threw
-----Original Message-----
From: Rybarski, Amanda
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
some of it, I'm catching a cold I think, so I slept alot during it. It made me mad too, I was all decked out in my superbowl shirt and the football stripes on my face and everything. And to top it off, there were around 50 people at Brian's parent's house. What about you?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:
so did you watch the game | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Well, his name is David Mitchel. His email is [email protected] (is that the
right company).
Anything else going on?
Kay Mann@ENRON
06/07/2001 02:33 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: David Marshall
Could you PLEASE PLEASE call David Marshall and get his email? I'm on
endless conference calls and need to contact him about a matter.
Thanks,
Kay
PS, not a vacation day | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
both - since they are right next to each other
"K. Bass" <[email protected]> on 02/01/2001 12:03:55 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Mandell
do you want to see one or two? LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "K. Bass" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Mandell
>
> there are probably 8-10 on the street. I would like to see all of them,
> but i can't afford the $380k one.
>
> can you see about tomorrow?
>
> thanks
>
> e
>
>
>
>
> "K. Bass" <[email protected]> on 02/01/2001 09:26:13 AM
>
> Please respond to "K. Bass" <[email protected]>
>
> To: [email protected]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Mandell
>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> 2405 Mandell looks really good. HCAD app. $267500.
> 2401 Mandell sold on 8/29/00 for $279900 in 6 days. These are Silvestri
> townhomes which I think are a cut above Perry. HCAD for 2402 (Perry) is
> $271800, not much less than asking price. This is a patio home. How many
> townhomes/patio homes would you estimate are on the street? Do you want
to
> try to see 2405 also? LU-M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 7:51 AM
> Subject: Mandell
>
>
> > these two are right across the street
> >
> > http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=526225
> >
> > http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=527102
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark has informed me that one of you would handle anything prior to 5/00 on
Oasis. Please see below. Let me know if I need to provide further
information.
Thanks!
Karen
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron on 08/11/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Karen Lindley 08/10/2000 03:38 PM
To: Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Deal Number 109660
Hi Mark!
Another interconnect issue - 7/99:
Can you please take a look at deal 109660? It is set up with a transport
usage ticket, however is a brokered deal. I am not sure if it is pathed
incorrectly or if possibly the deal is set up incorrectly.
Let me know your thoughts.
Karen | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steph, I have tried unsuccessfully to send an e-mail to Mark Dodson telling him that I have talked to Marcus Wood. Would you attempt to forward this message to him? Thank you.
Jim Derrick
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dodson, Mark" <[email protected]>@ENRON [NOTES:"Dodson, Mark" <[email protected]>@ENRON]
To: Derrick Jr., James <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu Oct 11 12:04:27 2001
Subject: pray for me
I am about to apply for the acquisition of PGE to the OPUC here in
Oregon--Stoel Rives is our usual law firm and Marcus Wood has done some work
for Enron so we would need to clear waivers with you--503 294-9434 is his
phone number but he will be trying to reach you regarding this important
matter--thank you for trying to reach me so promptly MARK | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Entergy has joined the SE Trans RTO (Southern, etal). I will review the FERC filing; however, an Entergy rep called me today to ask for Enron's support stating that the new RTO proposal includes:
-- Independent Market Operator (he said such as PJM)
-- No Day Ahead Balanced Schedules
-- LMP
-- One OASIS and one Tariff (no separate tariff for Entergy's ITC)
-- One Security Coordinator
-- Initial license plate rate within Entergy area
-- local planning in Entergy footprint
He also said that they are trying to have the GridSouth group agree to use the same Independent Market Operator so there would be one market structure for the Southeast.
Hopefully, the filing reflects this -- more later. Christi
-----Original Message-----
From: Connor, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc: Staines, Dan; Nord, Sue; Robinson, Marchris
Subject: SeTrans Update
Attached is an announcement on SeTrans adding Entergy as a member and setting dates for meeting in Atlanta in Jan. 2002 to form stakeholder group. I haven't seen the update they provided to FERC. I'll find it and get you a copy. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I don't know. Can we get someone in IT to respond?
Mary Clark
09/26/2000 05:42 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Question For All-Employee Meeting
Steve, I believe the answer is that we don't mandate a specific format for
dates for all locations but rather use what is done locally -- just like this
employee's recollection. Do you agree?
Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 05:37
PM ---------------------------
Richard Causey
07/14/2000 07:14 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Question For All-Employee Meeting
Mary, Rick is on vacation and I am monitoring his email. This question has
come up before and we sent it to Philippe Bibi. It is a computer question.
Mary Clark
07/13/2000 11:27 AM
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Question For All-Employee Meeting
Rick, can you prepare a response to this question for Ken, Jeff and Joe? If
you're not the right contact for this, do you know who is? I need a response
by Aug. 3. Thanks.
Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2000 11:21
AM ---------------------------
David M Fabian@ECT
07/13/2000 11:14 AM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Question For All-Employee Meeting
Dear Ms. Clark,
Here is my question:
Would you allow our staff and customers to vote on Enron adopting the
International Standards Organization Specification for formatting dates (i.e.
"YYYY-MM-DD")?
Please let me know if you would like me to send you a list of the many
advantages in using the ISO standards.
I asked Ken Lay this question a few years ago, but he thought we should use
local customs; however, as we are becoming more international and more
internet-based, the ISO standard is becoming more advantageous.
Thank you,
Dave Fabian | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FirstEnergy System (FIRSTENESY) has assigned its transmission assets and
service agreements to American Transmission Systems, Inc. (ATSI) They are a
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. Their mnemonic reference changed from "FE"
to "ATSI." | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks Kevin. It has been very rewarding working here. You are truly a
valuable asset to this company and I appreciate all your help and efficiency.
Charlie
Kevin G Moore
01/24/2001 08:01 AM
To: V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Last Day with Weather Group
Hey ! Charlie
Just a note to say Goodbye and wish you well.
See you around.
Kevin Moore
And the Weather Team.......... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:43:36 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
>The original message was received at Mon, 22 May 2000 15:43:33 -0500 (CDT)
>from pres-204.rice.edu [128.42.102.204]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><[email protected]>
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
> >>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
><<< 550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
>550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
>
> ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>Received: from [128.42.102.204] (pres-204.rice.edu [128.42.102.204])
> by hydrant.ruf.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA14623;
> Mon, 22 May 2000 15:43:33 -0500 (CDT)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Sender: [email protected] (Unverified)
>Message-Id: <v0421010db54f537f5bba@[128.42.102.204]>
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:44:53 -0600
>To: [email protected]
>From: Malcolm Gillis <[email protected]>
>Cc: cdelpag, grwhit, zodrow, [email protected], deng
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>
>Dear Ken:
>
> I have talked to Gil Whitaker, Steve Kean, and George Zodrow
>in the Department of Economics, about an alternate name for what we
>have been tentatively calling the "Center for the Study of Markets in
>Transition."
>
> Here are four possibilities:
>
> 1. Center for Study of Markets in Transformation
>
> 2. Center for Study of Global Market Transformation
>
> 3. Center for Study of Market Innovations
>
> 4. Center for Study of Market Privitization.
>
> Please let us know if any of these will do. I hope that you
>will allow us, whatever description is selected, to place the name
>"Ken and Linda Lay" before the word Center. Or, if you prefer, the
>"Lay Family Center for the Study of ________."
>
>Best regards,
>
>Malcolm
>___________________________
>Malcolm Gillis
>President
>RICE UNIVERSITY
>Post Office Box 1892
>Houston, Texas 77251-1892
>
>6100 Main Street
>Houston, Texas 77005
>
>Internet: [email protected]
>Telephone: (713) 348-4041
>Facsimile: (713) 348-5271
___________________________
Malcolm Gillis
President
RICE UNIVERSITY
Post Office Box 1892
Houston, Texas 77251-1892
6100 Main Street
Houston, Texas 77005
Internet: [email protected]
Telephone: (713) 348-4041
Facsimile: (713) 348-5271 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Zimin!
Please find attached for your review the UK RPI model, derived by
bootstrapping RPI swaps.
It's a very simple model and here are its specifics:
SWAP STRUCTURE
Payment: semi/semi Act/365F
>
> YOYUKRPI = (UKRPI(p-2)/UKRPI(p-14) - 1)/2
> p = payment month
>
The first payment is the latest known historical RPI, February 2000, 2.32%.
ASSUMPTIONS
* Constant cashflows between the quoted years (as opposed to interpolating
swaps which distorts the curve a lot). This explains the atrocious look of
the "raw" curve. It is then smoothed with a macro, which Anjam wrote.
* Mid point of the swaps is used for deriving the curve;
* Discount rate is LIBOR and I solve for the coupon rate, which is the RPI
YOY rate;
* The above is solved separately for each quoted period (e.g. 2 yrs, 5 yrs)
and RPI rates are determined for the incremental portion.
By forecasting RPI in the above method we are able to lock in and deliver the
forecasted levels.
Looking forward to your comments and seeing you in London!
Best regards,
Martina
x34327 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
07:18 AM ---------------------------
From: Doug Leach 11/29/2000 06:46 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Brown/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: The Oil Daily Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2000 (pdf)
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 06:45 AM
---------------------------
"Energy Intelligence Group, Inc." <[email protected]> on 11/28/2000
07:18:40 PM
To: Doug Leach <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: The Oil Daily Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2000 (pdf)
CUSTOMER SERVICE:
For any delivery problems, or changes in address,
simply e-mail [email protected]
Please be sure to include full subscriber/company name and
address in your e-mail.
For more information on EIG, visit www.energyintel.com
VIEWING .PDF DOCUMENTS:
Use the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view an attached
.PDF document in its full graphic format, that
is, exactly as it is printed. If you don''t have
Adobe Acrobat Reader installed, you can download
it from the internet: http://www.adobe.com
Follow the links at Adobe''s web site to Acrobat Reader.
Once Acrobat Reader is installed, save the .PDF
document to your disk, open Adobe Acrobat Reader
and then open the .PDF document.
*******************************
Copyright (c) 2000 EIG, Inc.
Reproduction in any form (photostatically, electronically,
or via facsimile), including via local- and wide-area
networks, is strictly forbidden without direct
licensed permission from EIG -- contact
[email protected].
Indirect authorization to photocopy individual
articles or other items for internal and personal
use is granted by EIG provided that the
appropriate fee is paid directly to Copyright
Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
MA 01923. Tel: 1-978-750-8400.
- de001129.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.