Spaces:
Running
Running
davanstrien
HF Staff
Add support for reasoning trace display from NuMarkdown-8B-Thinking model
34cedd8
Multi-OCR Engine Comparison UI Patterns
Executive Summary
This document outlines UI design patterns for comparing the results of 5+ OCR engines in the OCR Time Capsule application. Based on research of existing comparison tools and UI best practices, we recommend a hybrid approach combining selective comparison, matrix views, and progressive disclosure.
Key Design Constraints
- Human Cognitive Limits: Users can effectively compare 3-7 items simultaneously
- Screen Real Estate: Limited horizontal space for side-by-side comparisons
- Information Density: Need to show both text content and metadata
- Performance: Rendering 5+ full texts simultaneously can impact performance
Recommended UI Patterns
1. Selective Comparison Mode (Primary Recommendation)
Allow users to select 2-4 engines for detailed comparison from a larger set.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Select OCR Engines to Compare: │
│ ┌─┐ Tesseract 5.0 ┌─┐ Google Vision ┌─┐ AWS Textract │
│ ├─┤ Azure AI ├─┤ PaddleOCR ├─┤ Surya OCR │
│ └─┘ EasyOCR └─┘ TrOCR └─┘ RolmOCR │
│ │
│ [Compare Selected (3)] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
After selection:
┌─────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┐
│ Image │ Tesseract │ Google │ AWS │
│ Preview │ 5.0 │ Vision │ Textract │
├─────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┤
│ │ Text output │ Text output │ Text output │
│ [IMG] │ Lorem ipsum │ Lorem ipsum │ Lorem ipsum │
│ │ dolor sit │ dolor sit │ dolar sit │
│ │ amet... │ amet... │ amet... │
└─────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┘
Advantages:
- Maintains readable comparison
- User controls complexity
- Scalable to any number of engines
2. Matrix/Grid Overview
Show all results in a compact grid with expand/collapse functionality.
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OCR Engine Comparison Matrix │
├────────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────────┬────────┤
│ Engine │ Accuracy │ Time(ms) │ Preview │ Action │
├────────────┼───────────┼──────────┼─────────┼────────┤
│ Tesseract │ 94.2% │ 1250 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
│ Google │ 98.1% │ 320 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
│ AWS │ 97.5% │ 410 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
│ Azure │ 96.8% │ 380 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
│ PaddleOCR │ 95.3% │ 890 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
│ Surya │ 93.7% │ 1100 │ Lorem...│ [View] │
└────────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────────┴────────┘
Click [View] to see full text in modal/sidebar
Advantages:
- Shows all engines at once
- Easy to scan metrics
- Detailed view on demand
3. Reference + Diff View
Select one OCR result as reference and show diffs from others.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Reference: Google Vision OCR │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing ││
│ │ elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore ││
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│
│ │
│ Differences from Reference: │
│ ┌─────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┐│
│ │ Tesseract │ -dolor +dolar (char 12) ││
│ │ │ -adipiscing +adipiscing (char 38) ││
│ ├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤│
│ │ AWS │ -consectetur +consektetur (char 27) ││
│ ├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────┤│
│ │ Azure │ No differences ││
│ └─────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────┘│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Advantages:
- Reduces visual complexity
- Easy to see variations
- Good for finding consensus
4. Accordion/Tab Hybrid
Combine tabs for primary views with accordions for details.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [Overview] [Side-by-Side] [Consensus] [Analytics] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Overview Tab: │
│ │
│ ▼ Tesseract 5.0 (94.2% accuracy) │
│ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet... │
│ [Show full text] [Compare with others] │
│ │
│ ▶ Google Vision (98.1% accuracy) │
│ ▶ AWS Textract (97.5% accuracy) │
│ ▶ Azure AI (96.8% accuracy) │
│ ▶ PaddleOCR (95.3% accuracy) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Advantages:
- Progressive disclosure
- Maintains context
- Flexible navigation
5. Consensus/Voting View
Show agreement levels between engines.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Consensus View - 6 OCR Engines │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Lorem ipsum █████ sit amet, ████████████ adipiscing │
│ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ │
│ 5/6 agree 6/6 agree (consensus) │
│ │
│ Disagreements: │
│ Position 12-16: "dolor" │
│ - Tesseract: "dolar" (1 vote) │
│ - Others: "dolor" (5 votes) ✓ │
│ │
│ Position 27-38: "consectetur" │
│ - AWS: "consektetur" (1 vote) │
│ - Others: "consectetur" (5 votes) ✓ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Advantages:
- Shows confidence levels
- Identifies problem areas
- Good for quality assessment
6. Layered Comparison
Stack results with transparency/overlay controls.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer Controls: │ Opacity Visible │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────┐├───────────┬────────┤│
│ │ ││ ●━━━━━━━━ │ ☑ ││
│ │ [Overlaid Text View] ││ Tesseract │ ││
│ │ │├───────────┼────────┤│
│ │ Multiple colored layers ││ ━●━━━━━━━ │ ☑ ││
│ │ showing differences ││ Google │ ││
│ │ │├───────────┼────────┤│
│ │ ││ ━━━●━━━━━ │ ☐ ││
│ │ ││ AWS │ ││
│ └──────────────────────────────┘└───────────┴────────┘│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Advantages:
- Visual diff representation
- Adjustable comparison
- Good for alignment issues
Metadata Display Patterns
Inline Badges
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Tesseract 5.0 [94.2%] [1.2s] [MIT] │
│ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet... │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Hover Cards
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Google Vision ⓘ │
│ ┌─────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Accuracy: 98.1% │ (on hover) │
│ │ Time: 320ms │ │
│ │ Cost: $0.0015 │ │
│ │ Language: Multi │ │
│ └─────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Navigation Patterns
1. Engine Selector Bar
[All] [High Accuracy] [Fast] [Open Source] [Custom Group]
2. Quick Switch
Previous Engine [Tesseract ▼] Next Engine
Google Vision
AWS Textract
Azure AI
3. Comparison History
Recent Comparisons:
• Tesseract vs Google vs AWS (2 min ago)
• All engines - Page 15 (5 min ago)
• Azure vs PaddleOCR (10 min ago)
Mobile Considerations
For mobile devices, use a stacked card approach:
┌─────────────────┐
│ Original Image │
├─────────────────┤
│ Tesseract 94.2% │
│ ▼ Show text │
├─────────────────┤
│ Google 98.1% │
│ ▶ Show text │
├─────────────────┤
│ AWS 97.5% │
│ ▶ Show text │
└─────────────────┘
Performance Optimizations
- Lazy Loading: Only load full text when expanded/selected
- Virtual Scrolling: For long documents
- Caching: Store OCR results client-side
- Progressive Enhancement: Start with 2-3 engines, load more on demand
Recommended Implementation Priority
- Phase 1: Selective Comparison (2-4 engines)
- Phase 2: Matrix Overview with metrics
- Phase 3: Consensus/Voting view
- Phase 4: Advanced features (layers, history, etc.)
Accessibility Considerations
- Keyboard navigation between engines
- Screen reader announcements for differences
- High contrast mode for diff highlighting
- Alternative text descriptions for visual comparisons
Conclusion
The selective comparison pattern combined with a matrix overview provides the best balance of usability and functionality for comparing 5+ OCR engines. This approach:
- Respects cognitive limits (3-7 items)
- Provides overview and detail views
- Scales to any number of engines
- Maintains performance
- Works on mobile devices
The key is progressive disclosure: show summary information for all engines, but limit detailed comparison to user-selected subsets.